This is a modern-English version of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Kelly, Edward" to "Kite": Volume 15, Slice 7, originally written by Various.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
Transcriber’s note: |
A few typographical errors have been corrected. They
appear in the text like this, and the
explanation will appear when the mouse pointer is moved over the marked
passage. Sections in Greek will yield a transliteration
when the pointer is moved over them, and words using diacritic characters in the
Latin Extended Additional block, which may not display in some fonts or browsers, will
display an unaccented version. Links to other EB articles: Links to articles residing in other EB volumes will be made available when the respective volumes are introduced online. |
THE ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA
A DICTIONARY OF ARTS, SCIENCES, LITERATURE AND GENERAL INFORMATION
ELEVENTH EDITION
VOLUME XV SLICE VII
Kelly, Edward to Kite
Articles in This Slice
Articles in This Section

KELLY, EDWARD (1854-1880), Australian bushranger, was born at Wallan Wallan, Victoria. His father was a transported Belfast convict, and his mother’s family included several thieves. As boys he and his brothers were constantly in trouble for horse-stealing, and “Ned” served three years’ imprisonment for this offence. In April 1878, an attempt was made to arrest his brother Daniel on a similar charge. The whole Kelly family resisted this and Ned wounded one of the constables. Mrs Kelly and some of the others were captured, but Ned and Daniel escaped to the hills, where they were joined by two other desperadoes, Byrne and Hart. For two years, despite a reward of £8000 offered jointly by the governments of Victoria and New South Wales for their arrest, the gang under the leadership of Kelly terrorized the country on the borderland of Victoria and New South Wales, “holding up” towns and plundering banks. Their intimate knowledge of the district, full of convenient hiding-places, and their elaborate system of well-paid spies, ensured the direct pecuniary interest of many persons and contributed to their long immunity from capture. They never ill-treated a woman, nor preyed upon the poor, thus surrounding themselves with an attractive atmosphere of romance. In June 1880, however, they were at last tracked to a wooden shanty at Glenrowan, near Benalla, which the police surrounded, riddled with bullets, and finally set on fire. Kelly himself, who was outside, could, he claimed, easily have escaped had he not refused to desert his companions, all of whom were killed. He was severely wounded, captured and taken to Beechworth, where he was tried, convicted and hanged in October 1880. The total cost of the capture of the Kelly gang was reckoned at £115,000.
KELLY, EDWARD (1854-1880), Australian bushranger, was born in Wallan Wallan, Victoria. His father was a convict transported from Belfast, and his mother’s family included several thieves. As boys, he and his brothers were constantly getting into trouble for stealing horses, and “Ned” served three years in prison for this. In April 1878, an attempt was made to arrest his brother Daniel on a similar charge. The entire Kelly family resisted this, and Ned injured one of the police officers. Mrs. Kelly and some others were captured, but Ned and Daniel escaped to the hills, where they were joined by two other outlaws, Byrne and Hart. For two years, despite a reward of £8000 offered by the governments of Victoria and New South Wales for their capture, the gang, led by Kelly, terrorized the border area of Victoria and New South Wales, robbing towns and banks. Their deep knowledge of the area, with plenty of hiding spots, and their detailed network of well-paid informants ensured that many people had a financial interest in their escape, which contributed to their long evasion of capture. They never harmed a woman or targeted the poor, creating an appealing aura of romance around themselves. However, in June 1880, they were finally tracked down to a wooden shack in Glenrowan, near Benalla, which the police surrounded, shot at, and eventually set on fire. Kelly, who was outside, claimed he could have easily escaped but refused to abandon his companions, all of whom were killed. He was seriously wounded, captured, and taken to Beechworth, where he was tried, found guilty, and executed in October 1880. The total cost of capturing the Kelly gang was estimated at £115,000.
See F. A. Hare, The Last of the Bushrangers (London, 1892).
See F. A. Hare, The Last of the Bushrangers (London, 1892).

KELLY, SIR FITZROY (1796-1880), English judge, was born in London in October 1796, the son of a captain in the Royal Navy. In 1824 he was called to the bar, where he gained a reputation as a skilled pleader. In 1834 he was made a king’s counsel. A strong Tory, he was returned as member of parliament for Ipswich in 1835, but was unseated on petition. In 1837 however he again became member for that town. In 1843 he sat for Cambridge, and in 1852 was elected member for Harwich, but, a vacancy suddenly occurring in East Suffolk, he preferred to contest that seat and was elected. He was solicitor-general in 1845 (when he was knighted), and again in 1852. In 1858-1859 he was attorney-general in Lord Derby’s second administration. In 1866 he was raised to the bench as chief baron of the exchequer and made a member of the Privy Council. He died at Brighton on the 18th of September 1880.
KELLY, SIR FITZROY (1796-1880), an English judge, was born in London in October 1796, the son of a captain in the Royal Navy. He was called to the bar in 1824, where he earned a reputation as a talented lawyer. In 1834, he became a king’s counsel. A strong Tory, he was elected as a member of parliament for Ipswich in 1835, but lost his seat after a petition. However, in 1837, he was re-elected for that town. In 1843, he represented Cambridge, and in 1852, he was elected as a member for Harwich; but when a sudden vacancy arose in East Suffolk, he chose to run for that seat and won. He served as solicitor-general in 1845 (the year he was knighted) and again in 1852. From 1858 to 1859, he was attorney-general during Lord Derby’s second government. In 1866, he was appointed as chief baron of the exchequer and became a member of the Privy Council. He passed away in Brighton on September 18, 1880.
See E. Foss, Lives of the Judges (1870).
See E. Foss, Lives of the Judges (1870).

KELLY, HUGH (1739-1777), Irish dramatist and poet, son of a Dublin publican, was born in 1739 at Killarney. He was apprenticed to a staymaker, and in 1760 went to London. Here he worked at his trade for some time, and then became an attorney’s clerk. He contributed to various newspapers, and wrote pamphlets for the booksellers. In 1767 he published Memoirs of a Magdalen, or the History of Louisa Mildmay (2 vols.), a novel which obtained considerable success. In 1766 he published anonymously Thespis; or, A Critical Examination into the Merits of All the Principal Performers belonging to Drury Lane Theatre, a poem in the heroic couplet containing violent attacks on the principal contemporary actors and actresses. The poem opens with a panegyric on David Garrick, however, and bestows foolish praise on friends of the writer. This satire was partly inspired by Churchill’s Rosciad, but its criticism is obviously dictated chiefly by personal prejudice. In 1767 he produced a second part, less scurrilous in tone, dealing with the Covent Garden actors. His first comedy, False Delicacy, written in prose, was produced by Garrick at Drury Lane on the 23rd of January 1768, with the intention of rivalling Oliver Goldsmith’s Good-Natured Man. It is a moral and sentimental comedy, described by Garrick in the prologue as a sermon preached in acts. Although Samuel Johnson described it as “totally void of character,” it was very popular and had a great sale. In French and Portuguese versions it drew crowded houses in Paris and Lisbon. Kelly was a journalist in the pay of Lord North, and therefore hated by the party of John Wilkes, especially as being the editor of the Public Ledger. His Thespis had also made him many enemies; and Mrs Clive refused to act in his pieces. The production of his second comedy, A Word to the Wise (Drury Lane, 3rd of March 1770), occasioned a riot in the theatre, repeated at the second performance, and the piece had to be abandoned. His other plays are: Clementina (Covent Garden, 23rd of February 1771), a blank verse tragedy, given out to be the work of a “young American Clergyman” in order to escape the opposition of the Wilkites; The School for Wives (Drury Lane, 11th of December 1773), a prose comedy given out as the work of Major (afterwards Sir William) Addington; a two-act piece, The Romance of an Hour (Covent Garden, 2nd of December 1774), borrowed from Marmontel’s tale L’Amitié à l’épreuve; and an unsuccessful comedy, The Man of Reason (Covent Garden, 9th of February 1776). He was called to the bar at the Middle Temple in 1774, and determined to give up literature. He failed in his new profession and died in poverty on the 3rd of February 1777.
KELLY, HUGH (1739-1777), Irish playwright and poet, was born in 1739 in Killarney to a Dublin pub owner. He did an apprenticeship as a staymaker and moved to London in 1760. There, he worked at his trade for a while before becoming an attorney's clerk. He wrote for various newspapers and produced pamphlets for booksellers. In 1767, he released Memoirs of a Magdalen, or the History of Louisa Mildmay (2 vols.), a novel that gained significant success. In 1766, he anonymously published Thespis; or, A Critical Examination into the Merits of All the Principal Performers belonging to Drury Lane Theatre, a poem in heroic couplets that harshly criticized leading actors and actresses of the time. The poem begins with a tribute to David Garrick but also contains silly praise for the writer's friends. This satire was partly inspired by Churchill’s Rosciad, but the criticism was mainly influenced by personal bias. In 1767, he released a second part, which was less aggressive in tone and focused on the Covent Garden actors. His first comedy, False Delicacy, written in prose, premiered at Drury Lane on January 23, 1768, aiming to rival Oliver Goldsmith’s Good-Natured Man. It is a moral and sentimental comedy, described by Garrick in the prologue as a sermon performed in acts. Although Samuel Johnson called it “totally void of character,” it was very popular and sold well. The play was successful in French and Portuguese versions, drawing large crowds in Paris and Lisbon. Kelly was a journalist on Lord North's payroll, which made him unpopular with John Wilkes' supporters, especially since he was the editor of the Public Ledger. His Thespis also earned him many enemies; Mrs. Clive refused to act in any of his works. The premiere of his second comedy, A Word to the Wise (Drury Lane, March 3, 1770), led to a riot in the theater, which occurred again at the second performance, forcing the piece to be dropped. His other plays include: Clementina (Covent Garden, February 23, 1771), a blank verse tragedy presented as the work of a “young American Clergyman” to avoid opposition from the Wilkites; The School for Wives (Drury Lane, December 11, 1773), a prose comedy passed off as Major (later Sir William) Addington's work; a two-act piece, The Romance of an Hour (Covent Garden, December 2, 1774), adapted from Marmontel’s tale L’Amitié à l’épreuve; and the unsuccessful comedy The Man of Reason (Covent Garden, February 9, 1776). He was called to the bar at the Middle Temple in 1774 and decided to abandon literature. He struggled in his new career and died in poverty on February 3, 1777.
See The Works of Hugh Kelly, to which is prefixed the Life of the Author (1778); Genest, History of the Stage (v. 163, 263-269, 308, 399, 457, 517). Pamphlets in reply to Thespis are: “Anti-Thespis ...” (1767); “The Kellyad ...” (1767), by Louis Stamma; and “The Rescue or Thespian Scourge ...” (1767), by John Brown-Smith.
See The Works of Hugh Kelly, to which is prefixed the Life of the Author (1778); Genest, History of the Stage (v. 163, 263-269, 308, 399, 457, 517). Pamphlets responding to Thespis include: “Anti-Thespis ...” (1767); “The Kellyad ...” (1767), by Louis Stamma; and “The Rescue or Thespian Scourge ...” (1767), by John Brown-Smith.

KELLY, MICHAEL (1762-1826), British actor, singer and composer, was the son of a Dublin wine-merchant and dancing-master. He had a musical education at home and in Italy, and for four years from 1783 was engaged to sing at the Court Theatre at Vienna, where he became a friend of Mozart. In 1786 he sang in the first performance of the Nozze di Figaro. Appearing in London, at Drury Lane in 1787, he had a great success, and thenceforth was the principal English tenor at that theatre. In 1793 he became acting-manager of the King’s Theatre, and he was in great request at concerts. He wrote a number of songs (including “The Woodpecker”), and the music for many dramatic pieces, now fallen into oblivion. In 1826 he published his entertaining Reminiscences, in writing which he was helped by Theodore Hook. He combined his professional work with conducting a music-shop and a wine-shop, but with disastrous financial results. He died at Margate on the 9th of October 1826.
KELLY, MICHAEL (1762-1826), British actor, singer, and composer, was the son of a wine merchant and dance teacher from Dublin. He received a musical education both at home and in Italy, and was engaged to sing at the Court Theatre in Vienna for four years starting in 1783, where he became friends with Mozart. In 1786, he performed in the first ever showing of Nozze di Figaro. After appearing in London at Drury Lane in 1787, he achieved great success and became the leading English tenor at that theater. In 1793, he took on the role of acting manager at the King’s Theatre and was in high demand for concerts. He wrote several songs (including “The Woodpecker”) and composed music for many dramatic works that have since been forgotten. In 1826, he published his entertaining Reminiscences, which he co-wrote with Theodore Hook. He combined his professional career with running a music shop and a wine shop, but this led to significant financial struggles. He passed away in Margate on October 9, 1826.

KELP (in M.E. culp or culpe, of unknown origin; the Fr. equivalent is varech), the ash produced by the incineration of various kinds of sea-weed (Algae) obtainable in great abundance on the west coasts of Ireland and Scotland, and the coast of Brittany. It is prepared from the deep-sea tangle (Laminaria digitata), sugar wrack (L. saccharina), knobbed wrack (Fucus nodosus), black wrack (F. serratus), and bladder wrack (F. vesiculosus). The Laminarias yield what is termed “drift-weed kelp,” obtainable only when cast up on the coasts by storms or other causes. The species of Fucus growing within the tidal range are cut from the rocks at low water, and are therefore known as “cut-weeds.” The weeds are first dried in the sun and are then collected into shallow pits and burned till they form a fused mass, which while still hot is sprinkled with water to break it up into convenient pieces. A ton of kelp is obtained from 20 to 22 tons of wet sea-weed. The average composition may vary as follows: potassium sulphate, 10 to 12%; potassium chloride, 20 to 25%; sodium carbonate, 5%; other sodium and magnesium salts, 15 to 20%; and insoluble ash from 40 to 50%. The relative richness in iodine of different samples varies largely, good drift kelp yielding as much as 10 to 15 ℔ per ton of 22½ cwts., whilst cut-weed kelp will not give more than 3 to 721 4 ℔. The use of kelp in soap and glass manufacture has been rendered obsolete by the modern process of obtaining carbonate of soda cheaply from common salt (see Iodine).
Kelp (in M.E. culp or culpe, of unknown origin; the Fr. equivalent is varech), is the ash produced by burning various types of seaweed (Algae) found in large quantities along the west coasts of Ireland, Scotland, and Brittany. It's made from deep-sea tangle (Laminaria digitata), sugar wrack (L. saccharina), knobbed wrack (Fucus nodosus), black wrack (F. serratus), and bladder wrack (F. vesiculosus). The Laminarias produce what’s known as “drift-weed kelp,” which can only be collected when washed up on the shores by storms or other events. The species of Fucus that grow within the tidal range are harvested from the rocks at low tide, and are called “cut-weeds.” First, the weeds are dried in the sun, then gathered into shallow pits and burned until they form a fused mass. While still hot, water is sprinkled on it to break it up into manageable pieces. One ton of kelp is produced from 20 to 22 tons of wet seaweed. The average composition can vary and typically includes: potassium sulfate, 10 to 12%; potassium chloride, 20 to 25%; sodium carbonate, 5%; other sodium and magnesium salts, 15 to 20%; and insoluble ash from 40 to 50%. The iodine content in different samples can vary significantly; good drift kelp can yield as much as 10 to 15 ℔ per ton of 22½ cwts., while cut-weed kelp usually produces no more than 3 to 4 ℔. The use of kelp in soap and glass manufacturing has become outdated due to the modern method of obtaining carbonate of soda cheaply from common salt (see Iodine).

KELSO, a police burgh and market town of Roxburghshire, Scotland, on the left bank of the Tweed, 52 m. (43 m. by road) S.E. of Edinburgh and 10¼ m. N.E. of Jedburgh by the North British railway. Pop. (1901), 4008. The name has been derived from the Old Welsh calch, or Anglo-Saxon cealc, “chalk”, and the Scots how, “hollow,” a derivation more evident in the earlier forms Calkon and Calchon, and illustrated in Chalkheugh, the name of a locality in the town. The ruined abbey, dedicated to the Virgin and St John the Evangelist, was founded in 1128 by David I. for monks from Tiron in Picardy, whom he transferred hither from Selkirk, where they had been installed fifteen years before. The abbey, the building of which was completed towards the middle of the 13th century, became one of the richest and most powerful establishments in Scotland, claiming precedence over the other monasteries and disputing for a time the supremacy with St Andrews. It suffered damage in numerous English forays, was pillaged by the 4th earl of Shrewsbury in 1522, and was reduced to ruins in 1545 by the earl of Hertford (afterwards the Protector Somerset). In 1602 the abbey lands passed into the hands of Sir Robert Ker of Cessford, 1st earl of Roxburghe. The ruins were disfigured by an attempt to render part of them available for public worship, and one vault was long utilized as the town gaol. All excrescences, however, were cleared away at the beginning of the 19th century, by the efforts of the Duke of Roxburghe. The late Norman and Early Pointed cruciform church has an unusual ground-plan, the west end of the cross forming the nave and being shorter than the chancel. The nave and transepts extend only 23 ft. from the central tower. The remains include most of the tower, nearly the whole of the walls of the south transept, less than half of the west front with a fragment of the richly moulded and deeply-set doorway, the north and west sides of the north transept, and a remnant of the chancel. The chancel alone had aisles, while its main circular arches were surmounted by two tiers of triforium galleries. The predominant feature is the great central tower, which, as seen from a distance, suggests the keep of a Norman castle. It rested on four Early Pointed arches, each 45 ft. high (of which the south and west yet exist) supported by piers of clustered columns. Over the Norman porch in the north transept is a small chamber with an interlaced arcade surmounted by a network gable.
KELSO, is a police burgh and market town in Roxburghshire, Scotland, located on the left bank of the Tweed, 52 miles (43 miles by road) southeast of Edinburgh and 10¼ miles northeast of Jedburgh by the North British railway. The population in 1901 was 4,008. The name comes from the Old Welsh calch, or Anglo-Saxon cealc, meaning "chalk," combined with the Scots how, meaning "hollow," a connection that's clearer in the earlier names Calkon and Calchon, and illustrated by Chalkheugh, a local area in the town. The ruined abbey, dedicated to the Virgin and St. John the Evangelist, was founded in 1128 by David I for monks from Tiron in Picardy, whom he had brought here from Selkirk, where they had been for fifteen years. The abbey's construction was finished around the middle of the 13th century, making it one of the wealthiest and most powerful establishments in Scotland, which claimed superiority over other monasteries and briefly challenged St. Andrews for dominance. It suffered damage from multiple English raids, was looted by the 4th Earl of Shrewsbury in 1522, and was reduced to ruins in 1545 by the Earl of Hertford (later known as the Protector Somerset). In 1602, the abbey lands were transferred to Sir Robert Ker of Cessford, the 1st Earl of Roxburghe. The ruins were marred by attempts to adapt parts for public worship, and one vault was used as the town jail for a long time. However, all unnecessary additions were removed at the start of the 19th century through the efforts of the Duke of Roxburghe. The late Norman and Early Pointed cruciform church has a unique layout, with the west end of the cross serving as the nave and being shorter than the chancel. The nave and transepts extend only 23 feet from the central tower. The remains include most of the tower, nearly all of the walls of the south transept, less than half of the west front with part of the intricately moulded and deeply-set doorway, the north and west sides of the north transept, and a section of the chancel. Only the chancel had aisles, while its main circular arches were topped by two tiers of triforium galleries. The main feature is the large central tower, which, seen from afar, looks like the keep of a Norman castle. It stood on four Early Pointed arches, each 45 feet high (of which the south and west ones still exist), supported by clustered columns. Above the Norman porch in the north transept is a small room with an interlaced arcade topped by a network gable.
The Tweed is crossed at Kelso by a bridge of five arches constructed in 1803 by John Rennie. The public buildings include a court house, the town hall, corn exchange, high school and grammar school (occupying the site of the school which Sir Walter Scott attended in 1783). The public park lies in the east of the town, and the race-course to the north of it. The leading industries are the making of fishing tackle, agricultural machinery and implements, and chemical manures, besides coach-building, cabinet-making and upholstery, corn and saw mills, iron founding, &c. James and John Ballantyne, friends of Scott, set up a press about the end of the 18th century, from which there issued, in 1802, the first two volumes of the Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border; but when the brothers transferred their business to Edinburgh printing languished. The Kelso Mail, founded by James Ballantyne in 1797, is now the oldest of the Border newspapers. The town is an important agricultural centre, there being weekly corn and fortnightly cattle markets, and, every September, a great sale of Border rams.
The Tweed is crossed at Kelso by a five-arch bridge built in 1803 by John Rennie. The public buildings include a courthouse, town hall, corn exchange, high school, and grammar school (located on the site of the school that Sir Walter Scott attended in 1783). The public park is in the east of the town, and the racecourse is to the north of it. The main industries are making fishing tackle, agricultural machinery and tools, and chemical fertilizers, as well as coach-building, cabinet-making, upholstery, corn and sawmills, iron founding, etc. James and John Ballantyne, friends of Scott, started a press around the end of the 18th century, which produced the first two volumes of the Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border in 1802; however, when the brothers moved their business to Edinburgh, printing declined. The Kelso Mail, founded by James Ballantyne in 1797, is now the oldest newspaper in the Borders. The town is an important agricultural center, hosting weekly corn and biweekly cattle markets, and every September, a major sale of Border rams.
Kelso became a burgh of barony in 1634 and five years later received the Covenanters, under Sir Alexander Leslie, on their way to the encampment on Duns Law. On the 24th of October 1715 the Old Pretender was proclaimed James VIII. in the market square, but in 1745 Prince Charles Edward found no active adherents in the town.
Kelso was designated a burgh of barony in 1634 and five years later welcomed the Covenanters, led by Sir Alexander Leslie, as they made their way to the camp at Duns Law. On October 24, 1715, the Old Pretender was declared James VIII in the market square, but in 1745 Prince Charles Edward found no active supporters in the town.
About 1 m. W. of Kelso is Floors or Fleurs Castle, the principal seat of the duke of Roxburghe. The mansion as originally designed by Sir John Vanbrugh in 1718 was severely plain, but in 1849 William Henry Playfair converted it into a magnificent structure in the Tudor style.
About 1 mile west of Kelso is Floors or Fleurs Castle, the main residence of the Duke of Roxburghe. The mansion, originally designed by Sir John Vanbrugh in 1718, was quite plain, but in 1849, William Henry Playfair transformed it into a stunning structure in the Tudor style.
On the peninsula formed by the junction of the Teviot and the Tweed stood the formidable castle and flourishing town of Roxburgh, from which the shire took its name. No trace exists of the town, and of the castle all that is left are a few ruins shaded by ancient ash trees. The castle was built by the Northumbrians, who called it Marchidum, or Marchmound, its present name apparently meaning Rawic’s burgh, after some forgotten chief. After the consolidation of the kingdom of Scotland it became a favoured royal residence, and a town gradually sprang up beneath its protection, which reached its palmiest days under David I., and formed a member of the Court of Four Burghs with Edinburgh, Stirling and Berwick. It possessed a church, court of justice, mint, mills, and, what was remarkable for the 12th century, grammar school. Alexander II. was married and Alexander III. was born in the castle. During the long period of Border warfare, the town was repeatedly burned and the castle captured. After the defeat of Wallace at Falkirk the castle fell into the hands of the English, from whom it was delivered in 1314 by Sir James Douglas. Ceded to Edward III. in 1333, it was regained in 1342 by Sir Alexander Ramsay of Dalhousie, only to be lost again four years later. The castle was finally retaken and razed to the ground in 1460. It was at the siege that the king, James II., was killed by the explosion of a huge gun called “the Lion.” On the fall of the castle the town languished and was finally abandoned in favour of the rising burgh of Kelso. The town, whose patron-saint was St James, is still commemorated by St James’s Fair, which is held on the 5th of every August on the vacant site, and is the most popular of Border festivals.
On the peninsula created by the meeting of the Teviot and the Tweed stood the impressive castle and thriving town of Roxburgh, from which the shire got its name. There are no traces left of the town, and all that remains of the castle are a few ruins shaded by ancient ash trees. The castle was built by the Northumbrians, who called it Marchidum, or Marchmound; its current name apparently means Rawic’s burgh, after some forgotten chief. After the kingdom of Scotland was unified, it became a favorite royal residence, and a town gradually developed under its protection, reaching its peak during the reign of David I. It was part of the Court of Four Burghs with Edinburgh, Stirling, and Berwick. The town had a church, a court of justice, a mint, mills, and, notably for the 12th century, a grammar school. Alexander II was married there, and Alexander III was born in the castle. During the prolonged period of Border warfare, the town was repeatedly burned, and the castle was captured multiple times. After Wallace's defeat at Falkirk, the castle came under English control, only to be reclaimed in 1314 by Sir James Douglas. It was ceded to Edward III in 1333 but recaptured in 1342 by Sir Alexander Ramsay of Dalhousie, only to be lost again four years later. The castle was finally retaken and destroyed in 1460 during a siege where King James II was killed by the explosion of a massive cannon known as “the Lion.” After the castle's fall, the town declined and was eventually abandoned in favor of the growing burgh of Kelso. The town, whose patron saint was St. James, is still remembered by St. James’s Fair, held every August 5th at the vacant site, making it the most popular festival in the Borders.
Sandyknowe or Smailholm Tower, 6 m. W. of Kelso, dating from the 15th century, is considered the best example of a Border Peel and the most perfect relic of a feudal structure in the South of Scotland. Two m. N. by E. of Kelso is the pretty village of Ednam (Edenham, “The Village on the Eden”), the birthplace of the poet James Thomson, to whose memory an obelisk, 52 ft. high, was erected on Ferney Hill in 1820.
Sandyknowe or Smailholm Tower, 6 miles west of Kelso, built in the 15th century, is regarded as the finest example of a Border Peel and the most complete remnant of a feudal building in southern Scotland. Two miles north by east of Kelso is the charming village of Ednam (Edenham, “The Village on the Eden”), the birthplace of the poet James Thomson, for whom an obelisk, 52 feet tall, was erected on Ferney Hill in 1820.

KELVIN, WILLIAM THOMSON, Baron (1824-1907), British physicist, the second son of James Thomson, LL.D., professor of mathematics in the university of Glasgow, was born at Belfast, Ireland, on the 26th of June 1824, his father being then teacher of mathematics in the Royal Academical Institution. In 1832 James Thomson accepted the chair of mathematics at Glasgow, and migrated thither with his two sons, James and William, who in 1834 matriculated in that university, William being then little more than ten years of age, and having acquired all his early education through his father’s instruction. In 1841 William Thomson entered Peterhouse, Cambridge, and in 1845 took his degree as second wrangler, to which honour he added that of the first Smith’s Prize. The senior wrangler in his year was Stephen Parkinson, a man of a very different type of mind, yet one who was a prominent figure in Cambridge for many years. In the same year Thomson was elected fellow of Peterhouse. At that time there were few facilities for the study of experimental science in Great Britain. At the Royal Institution Faraday held a unique position, and was feeling his way almost alone. In Cambridge science had progressed little since the days of Newton. Thomson therefore had recourse to Paris, and for a year worked in the laboratory of Regnault, who was then engaged in his classical researches on the thermal properties of steam. In 1846, when only twenty-two years of age, he accepted the chair of natural philosophy in the university of Glasgow, which he filled for fifty-three years, attaining universal recognition as one of the greatest physicists of his time. The Glasgow chair was a source of inspiration to scientific men for more than half a century, and many of the most advanced researches of other physicists grew out of the suggestions which Thomson scattered as sparks from his anvil. One of his earliest papers dealt with the age of the earth, and brought him into collision with the geologists of the Uniformitarian school, who were claiming thousands of millions of years for the formation of the stratified portions of the earth’s crust. Thomson’s calculations on the conduction of heat showed that at some time between twenty millions and four hundred millions, probably about one hundred millions, of years ago, the physical conditions of the earth must have been entirely different from those which now obtain. This led to a long controversy, in which the physical principles held their ground. In 1847 Thomson first met James Prescott Joule at the Oxford meeting of the British Association. A fortnight later they again met in Switzerland, and together measured the rise of the temperature of the water in a mountain torrent due to its fall. Joule’s views of the nature of heat strongly influenced Thomson’s mind, with the result that in 1848 722 Thomson proposed his absolute scale of temperature, which is independent of the properties of any particular thermometric substance, and in 1851 he presented to the Royal Society of Edinburgh a paper on the dynamical theory of heat, which reconciled the work of N. L. Sadi Carnot with the conclusions of Count Rumford, Sir H. Davy, J. R. Mayer and Joule, and placed the dynamical theory of heat and the fundamental principle of the conservation of energy in a position to command universal acceptance. It was in this paper that the principle of the dissipation of energy, briefly summarized in the second law of thermodynamics, was first stated.
KELVIN, WILLIAM THOMSON, Baron (1824-1907), British physicist, the second son of James Thomson, LL.D., professor of mathematics at the University of Glasgow, was born in Belfast, Ireland, on June 26, 1824, when his father was teaching mathematics at the Royal Academical Institution. In 1832, James Thomson accepted the chair of mathematics at Glasgow and moved there with his two sons, James and William, who enrolled at the university in 1834. William was just over ten years old and had received all his early education from his father. In 1841, William Thomson entered Peterhouse, Cambridge, and in 1845, he graduated as the second wrangler, also winning the first Smith’s Prize. The senior wrangler that year was Stephen Parkinson, a very different type of thinker, but a notable figure in Cambridge for many years. That same year, Thomson was elected a fellow of Peterhouse. At that time, there were few options for studying experimental science in Great Britain. Faraday held a unique role at the Royal Institution and was navigating through the field almost alone. In Cambridge, scientific progress had barely advanced since Newton's days. Thomson thus went to Paris and spent a year working in Regnault’s laboratory, where Regnault was conducting his classic research on steam's thermal properties. In 1846, at just twenty-two, he accepted the chair of natural philosophy at the University of Glasgow, a position he held for fifty-three years, gaining widespread recognition as one of the greatest physicists of his era. The Glasgow chair inspired scientists for over half a century, and many advanced research ideas from other physicists stemmed from the suggestions Thomson shared. One of his earliest papers addressed the age of the earth and put him at odds with Uniformitarian geologists, who were advocating for the earth's crust to have formed over billions of years. Thomson's calculations on heat conduction suggested that, between twenty million and four hundred million years ago—likely around one hundred million years—the earth's physical conditions were entirely different from those today. This sparked a lengthy debate, during which the physical principles held strong. In 1847, Thomson first met James Prescott Joule at the Oxford meeting of the British Association. Two weeks later, they met again in Switzerland, where they measured the rise in temperature of water from a mountain stream caused by its descent. Joule's perspectives on heat greatly influenced Thomson, which led him to propose his absolute scale of temperature in 1848, a scale that isn’t reliant on any specific thermometric substance. In 1851, he presented a paper to the Royal Society of Edinburgh on the dynamical theory of heat, which reconciled the work of N. L. Sadi Carnot with the findings of Count Rumford, Sir H. Davy, J. R. Mayer, and Joule, establishing the dynamical theory of heat and the conservation of energy as universally accepted principles. It was in this paper that the concept of energy dissipation, summarized by the second law of thermodynamics, was first articulated.
Although his contributions to thermodynamics may properly be regarded as his most important scientific work, it is in the field of electricity, especially in its application to submarine telegraphy, that Lord Kelvin is best known to the world at large. From 1854 he is most prominent among telegraphists. The stranded form of conductor was due to his suggestion; but it was in the letters which he addressed in November and December of that year to Sir G. G. Stokes, and which were published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society for 1855, that he discussed the mathematical theory of signalling through submarine cables, and enunciated the conclusion that in long cables the retardation due to capacity must render the speed of signalling inversely proportional to the square of the cable’s length. Some held that if this were true ocean telegraphy would be impossible, and sought in consequence to disprove Thomson’s conclusion. Thomson, on the other hand, set to work to overcome the difficulty by improvement in the manufacture of cables, and first of all in the production of copper of high conductivity and the construction of apparatus which would readily respond to the slightest variation of the current in the cable. The mirror galvanometer and the siphon recorder, which was patented in 1867, were the outcome of these researches; but the scientific value of the mirror galvanometer is independent of its use in telegraphy, and the siphon recorder is the direct precursor of one form of galvanometer (d’Arsonval’s) now commonly used in electrical laboratories. A mind like that of Thomson could not be content to deal with any physical quantity, however successfully from a practical point of view, without subjecting it to measurement. Thomson’s work in connexion with telegraphy led to the production in rapid succession of instruments adapted to the requirements of the time for the measurement of every electrical quantity, and when electric lighting came to the front a new set of instruments was produced to meet the needs of the electrical engineer. Some account of Thomson’s electrometer is given in the article on that subject, while every modern work of importance on electric lighting describes the instruments which he has specially designed for central station work; and it may be said that there is no quantity which the electrical engineer is ordinarily called upon to measure for which Lord Kelvin did not construct the suitable instrument. Currents from the ten-thousandth of an ampere to ten thousand amperes, electrical pressures from a minute fraction of a volt to 100,000 volts, come within the range of his instruments, while the private consumer of electric energy is provided with a meter recording Board of Trade units.
Although his contributions to thermodynamics are considered his most significant scientific work, it's in the area of electricity, particularly its use in submarine telegraphy, that Lord Kelvin is most recognized by the general public. From 1854, he became a leading figure among telegraphers. The idea of using stranded conductors came from him; however, it was in letters he wrote in November and December of that year to Sir G. G. Stokes, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society in 1855, where he explored the mathematical theory behind signaling through submarine cables. He expressed the conclusion that in long cables, the delay caused by capacitance would make the signaling speed inversely proportional to the square of the cable's length. Some believed that if this were true, ocean telegraphy would be unfeasible, and they attempted to disprove Thomson’s conclusion. On the flip side, Thomson focused on overcoming this challenge by improving cable manufacture, starting with the production of highly conductive copper and developing equipment that could respond quickly to even the slightest current changes in the cable. The mirror galvanometer and the siphon recorder, patented in 1867, resulted from this research; however, the scientific value of the mirror galvanometer goes beyond its use in telegraphy, and the siphon recorder is a direct predecessor of one version of the galvanometer (d’Arsonval’s) now commonly found in electrical labs. A mind like Thomson’s wouldn't settle for addressing any physical quantity, no matter how practically successful, without measuring it. His work related to telegraphy led to the rapid development of instruments tailored to the demands of the time for measuring every electrical quantity, and as electric lighting gained prominence, a new set of instruments was produced to cater to the needs of electrical engineers. An overview of Thomson’s electrometer is available in the corresponding article, while every significant modern work on electric lighting outlines the instruments he specifically designed for central station operations; it can be said that there’s no quantity an electrical engineer is typically required to measure for which Lord Kelvin didn’t create an appropriate instrument. His instruments cover currents ranging from ten-thousandths of an ampere to ten thousand amperes, electrical voltages from a tiny fraction of a volt to 100,000 volts, while private consumers of electric energy have access to a meter that records Board of Trade units.
When W. Weber in 1851 proposed the extension of C. F. Gauss’s system of absolute units to electromagnetism, Thomson took up the question, and, applying the principles of energy, calculated the absolute electromotive force of a Daniell cell, and determined the absolute measure of the resistance of a wire from the heat produced in it by a known current. In 1861 it was Thomson who induced the British Association to appoint its first famous committee for the determination of electrical standards, and it was he who suggested much of the work carried out by J. Clerk Maxwell, Balfour Stewart and Fleeming Jenkin as members of that committee. The oscillatory character of the discharge of the Leyden jar, the foundation of the work of H. R. Hertz and of wireless telegraphy were investigated by him in 1853.
When W. Weber proposed in 1851 to extend C. F. Gauss’s system of absolute units to electromagnetism, Thomson took on the challenge. Using the principles of energy, he calculated the absolute electromotive force of a Daniell cell and determined the absolute measure of a wire's resistance based on the heat produced in it by a known current. In 1861, Thomson encouraged the British Association to create its first notable committee to establish electrical standards, and he proposed much of the work done by J. Clerk Maxwell, Balfour Stewart, and Fleeming Jenkin as members of that committee. He also studied the oscillatory behavior of the Leyden jar discharge, which laid the groundwork for the work of H. R. Hertz and for wireless telegraphy, in 1853.
It was in 1873 that he undertook to write a series of articles for Good Words on the mariner’s compass. He wrote the first, but so many questions arose in his mind that it was five years before the second appeared. In the meanwhile the compass went through a process of complete reconstruction in his hands a process which enabled both the permanent and the temporary magnetism of the ship to be readily compensated, while the weight of the 10-in. card was reduced to one-seventeenth of that of the standard card previously in use, although the time of swing was increased. Second only to the compass in its value to the sailor is Thomson’s sounding apparatus, whereby soundings can be taken in 100 fathoms by a ship steaming at 16 knots; and by the employment of piano-wire of a breaking strength of 140 tons per square inch and an iron sinker weighing only 34 ℔, with a self-registering pressure gauge, soundings can be rapidly taken in deep ocean. Thomson’s tide gauge, tidal harmonic analyser and tide predicter are famous, and among his work in the interest of navigation must be mentioned his tables for the simplification of Sumner’s method for determining the position of a ship at sea.
In 1873, he started writing a series of articles for Good Words about the mariner’s compass. He completed the first article, but he had so many questions that it took him five years to publish the second one. During that time, he completely overhauled the compass, allowing for easy compensation of both the permanent and temporary magnetism of the ship. He also reduced the weight of the 10-inch card to one-seventeenth of the standard card that was used before, even though the swing time increased. Right after the compass, Thomson’s sounding device is incredibly valuable to sailors, as it can take soundings in 100 fathoms while the ship moves at 16 knots. By using piano wire with a breaking strength of 140 tons per square inch and an iron sinker weighing only 34 pounds, along with a self-registering pressure gauge, soundings can be quickly taken in deep ocean. Thomson’s tide gauge, tidal harmonic analyzer, and tide predictor are well-known, and his tables that simplify Sumner’s method for determining a ship’s position at sea are also significant to navigation.
It is impossible within brief limits to convey more than a general idea of the work of a philosopher who published more than three hundred original papers bearing upon nearly every branch of physical science; who one day was working out the mathematics of a vortex theory of matter on hydrodynamical principles or discovering the limitations of the capabilities of the vortex atom, on another was applying the theory of elasticity to tides in the solid earth, or was calculating the size of water molecules, and later was designing an electricity meter, a dynamo or a domestic water-tap. It is only by reference to his published papers that any approximate conception can be formed of his life’s work; but the student who had read all these knew comparatively little of Lord Kelvin if he had not talked with him face to face. Extreme modesty, almost amounting to diffidence, was combined with the utmost kindliness in Lord Kelvin’s bearing to the most elementary student, and nothing seemed to give him so much pleasure as an opportunity to acknowledge the efforts of the humblest scientific worker. The progress of physical discovery during the last half of the 19th century was perhaps as much due to the kindly encouragement which he gave to his students and to others who came in contact with him as to his own researches and inventions; and it would be difficult to speak of his influence as a teacher in stronger terms than this.
It’s impossible to fully capture the work of a philosopher who published over three hundred original papers on almost every area of physical science in just a few words. One day, he might be developing the mathematics behind a vortex theory of matter using hydrodynamic principles, and the next, he could be exploring the limits of the vortex atom or applying the theory of elasticity to tides in the solid earth. He calculated the size of water molecules and later designed devices like an electricity meter, a dynamo, or a household water tap. To really understand his life’s work, you’d need to refer to his published papers; however, students who read all of these would still know relatively little about Lord Kelvin unless they had spoken with him directly. He had a remarkable blend of extreme modesty, almost to the point of shyness, and immense kindness, especially towards the most basic student. Nothing seemed to please him more than recognizing the efforts of even the most humble scientific worker. The advancement of physical discovery in the latter half of the 19th century was possibly as much a result of the support he offered his students and those who interacted with him as it was from his own research and inventions. It’s hard to describe his influence as a teacher in stronger terms than that.
One of his former pupils, Professor J. D. Cormack, wrote of him: “It is perhaps at the lecture table that Lord Kelvin displays most of his characteristics.... His master mind, soaring high, sees one vast connected whole, and, alive with enthusiasm, with smiling face and sparkling eye, he shows the panorama to his pupils, pointing out the similarities and differences of its parts, the boundaries of our knowledge, and the regions of doubt and speculation. To follow him in his flights is real mental exhilaration.”
One of his former students, Professor J. D. Cormack, wrote about him: “It’s probably at the lecture table where Lord Kelvin shows the most of his traits.... His brilliant mind, soaring high, sees one huge connected whole, and, full of enthusiasm, with a smiling face and sparkling eyes, he shares the big picture with his students, highlighting the similarities and differences of its parts, the limits of our knowledge, and the areas of uncertainty and speculation. Following him in his ideas is a true mental thrill.”
In 1852 Thomson married Margaret, daughter of Walter Crum of Thornliebank, who died in 1870; and in 1874 he married Frances Anna, daughter of Charles R. Blandy of Madeira. In 1866, perhaps chiefly in acknowledgment of his services to trans-Atlantic telegraphy, Thomson received the honour of knighthood, and in 1892 he was raised to the peerage with the title of Baron Kelvin of Largs. The Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order was conferred on him in 1896, the year of the jubilee of his professoriate. In 1890 he became president of the Royal Society, and he received the Order of Merit on its institution in 1902. A list of the degrees and other honours which he received during the fifty-three years he held his Glasgow chair would occupy as much space as this article; but any biographical sketch would be conspicuously incomplete if it failed to notice the celebration in 1896 of the jubilee of his professorship. Never before had such a gathering of rank and science assembled as that which filled the halls in the university of Glasgow on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June in that year. The city authorities joined with the university in honouring their most distinguished citizen. About 2500 guests were received in the university buildings, the library of which was devoted to an exhibition of the instruments invented by Lord Kelvin, together with his certificates, diplomas and medals. The Eastern, the Anglo-American and the Commercial 723 Cable companies united to celebrate the event, and from the university library a message was sent through Newfoundland, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Florida and Washington, and was received by Lord Kelvin seven and a half minutes after it had been despatched, having travelled about 20,000 miles and twice crossed the Atlantic during the interval. It was at the banquet in connexion with the jubilee celebration that the Lord Provost of Glasgow thus summarized Lord Kelvin’s character: “His industry is unwearied; and he seems to take rest by turning from one difficulty to another—difficulties that would appal most men and be taken as enjoyment by no one else.... This life of unwearied industry, of universal honour, has left Lord Kelvin with a lovable nature that charms all with whom he comes in contact.”
In 1852, Thomson married Margaret, the daughter of Walter Crum from Thornliebank, who passed away in 1870; and in 1874, he married Frances Anna, the daughter of Charles R. Blandy from Madeira. In 1866, likely in recognition of his contributions to transatlantic telegraphy, Thomson was honored with a knighthood, and in 1892, he was elevated to the peerage with the title of Baron Kelvin of Largs. He received the Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order in 1896, the same year as the jubilee of his professorship. In 1890, he became the president of the Royal Society, and he was awarded the Order of Merit when it was established in 1902. A list of the degrees and honors he received during the fifty-three years he held his chair at Glasgow would take up as much space as this article; however, any biographical account would be noticeably incomplete if it did not mention the celebration in 1896 of his professorship jubilee. Never before had such a gathering of dignitaries and scientists assembled as that which filled the halls of the University of Glasgow on June 15th, 16th, and 17th of that year. The city officials collaborated with the university to honor their most distinguished citizen. Around 2,500 guests were welcomed in the university buildings, where the library was dedicated to an exhibition of the instruments devised by Lord Kelvin, along with his certificates, diplomas, and medals. The Eastern, Anglo-American, and Commercial Cable companies came together to celebrate the event, and from the university library, a message was sent through Newfoundland, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Florida, and Washington, reaching Lord Kelvin seven and a half minutes after it was sent, having traveled about 20,000 miles and crossed the Atlantic twice in the process. At the banquet related to the jubilee celebration, the Lord Provost of Glasgow summarized Lord Kelvin's character like this: “His industry is tireless; he seems to rest by moving from one challenge to another—challenges that would terrify most people and bring no joy to anyone else... This life of tireless effort and universal respect has left Lord Kelvin with a lovable nature that endears him to all who meet him.”
Three years after this celebration Lord Kelvin resigned his chair at Glasgow, though by formally matriculating as a student he maintained his connexion with the university, of which in 1904 he was elected chancellor. But his retirement did not mean cessation of active work or any slackening of interest in the scientific thought of the day. Much of his time was given to writing and revising the lectures on the wave theory of light which he had delivered at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, in 1884, but which were not finally published till 1904. He continued to take part in the proceedings of various learned societies; and only a few months before his death, at the Leicester meeting of the British Association, he attested the keenness with which he followed the current developments of scientific speculation by delivering a long and searching address on the electronic theory of matter. He died on the 17th of December 1907 at his residence, Netherhall, near Largs, Scotland; there was no heir to his title, which became extinct.
Three years after this celebration, Lord Kelvin stepped down from his position at Glasgow, but by officially enrolling as a student, he remained connected to the university, of which he was elected chancellor in 1904. However, his retirement didn’t mean he stopped working or lost interest in contemporary scientific ideas. He spent a lot of time writing and editing the lectures on the wave theory of light that he had given at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore in 1884, but they weren’t published until 1904. He continued to be involved in various learned societies; just a few months before his death, at the Leicester meeting of the British Association, he demonstrated his keen interest in current scientific developments by delivering a thorough and insightful address on the electronic theory of matter. He died on December 17, 1907, at his home, Netherhall, near Largs, Scotland; he had no heir to his title, which became extinct.
In addition to the Baltimore lectures, he published with Professor P. G. Tait a standard but unfinished Treatise on Natural Philosophy (1867). A number of his scientific papers were collected in his Reprint of Papers on Electricity and Magnetism (1872), and in his Mathematical and Physical Papers (1882, 1883 and 1890), and three volumes of his Popular Lectures and Addresses appeared in 1889-1894. He was also the author of the articles on “Heat” and “Elasticity” in the 9th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica.
In addition to the Baltimore lectures, he published a standard yet unfinished Treatise on Natural Philosophy (1867) with Professor P. G. Tait. Several of his scientific papers were compiled in his Reprint of Papers on Electricity and Magnetism (1872), and in his Mathematical and Physical Papers (1882, 1883, and 1890). Three volumes of his Popular Lectures and Addresses were released between 1889 and 1894. He also wrote the articles on “Heat” and “Elasticity” for the 9th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica.
See Andrew Gray, Lord Kelvin (1908); S. P. Thompson, Life of Lord Kelvin (1910), which contains a full bibliography of his writings.
See Andrew Gray, Lord Kelvin (1908); S. P. Thompson, Life of Lord Kelvin (1910), which includes a complete bibliography of his works.

John Philip Kemble (1757-1823), the second child, was born at Prescot, Lancashire, on the 1st of February 1757. His mother was a Roman Catholic, and he was educated at Sedgeley Park Catholic seminary, near Wolverhampton, and the English college at Douai, with the view of becoming a priest. But at the conclusion of the four years’ course he discovered that he had no vocation for the priesthood, and returning to England he joined the theatrical company of Crump & Chamberlain, his first appearance being as Theodosius in Lee’s tragedy of that name at Wolverhampton on the 8th of January 1776. In 1778 he joined the York company of Tate Wilkinson, appearing at Wakefield as Captain Plume in Farquhar’s The Recruiting Officer; in Hull for the first time as Macbeth on the 30th of October, and in York as Orestes in Ambrose Philips’s Distressed Mother. In 1781 he obtained a “star” engagement at Dublin, making his first appearance there on the 2nd of November as Hamlet. He also achieved great success as Raymond in The Count of Narbonne, a play taken from Horace Walpole’s Castle of Otranto. Gradually he won for himself a high reputation as a careful and finished actor, and this, combined with the greater fame of his sister, led to an engagement at Drury Lane, where he made his first appearance on the 30th of September 1783 as Hamlet. In this rôle he awakened interest and discussion among the critics rather than the enthusiastic approval of the public. But as Macbeth on the 31st of March 1785 he shared in the enthusiasm aroused by Mrs Siddons, and established a reputation among living actors second only to hers. Brother and sister had first appeared together at Drury Lane on the 22nd of November 1783, as Beverley and Mrs Beverley in Moore’s The Gamester, and as King John and Constance in Shakespeare’s tragedy. In the following year they played Montgomerie and Matilda in Cumberland’s The Carmelite, and in 1785 Adorni and Camiola in Kemble’s adaptation of Massinger’s A Maid of Honour, and Othello and Desdemona. Between 1785 and 1787 Kemble appeared in a variety of rôles, his Mentevole in Jephson’s Julia producing an overwhelming impression. On the 8th of December 1787 he married Priscilla Hopkins Brereton (1756-1845), the widow of an actor and herself an actress. Kemble’s appointment as manager of Drury Lane in 1788 gave him full opportunity to dress the characters less according to tradition than in harmony with his own conception of what was suitable. He was also able to experiment with whatever parts might strike his fancy, and of this privilege he took advantage with greater courage than discretion. His activity was prodigious, the list of his parts including a large number of Shakespearian characters and also a great many in plays now forgotten. In his own version of Coriolanus, which was revived during his first season, the character of the “noble Roman” was so exactly suited to his powers that he not only played it with a perfection that has never been approached, but, it is said, unconsciously allowed its influence to colour his private manner and modes of speech. His tall and imposing person, noble countenance, and solemn and grave demeanour were uniquely adapted for the Roman characters in Shakespeare’s plays; and, when in addition he had to depict the gradual growth and development of one absorbing passion, his representation gathered a momentum and majestic force that were irresistible. His defect was in flexibility, variety, rapidity; the characteristic of his style was method, regularity, precision, elaboration even of the minutest details, founded on a thorough psychological study of the special personality he had to represent. His elocutionary art, his fine sense of rhythm and emphasis, enabled him to excel in declamation, but physically he was incapable of giving expression to impetuous vehemence and searching pathos. In Coriolanus and Cato he was beyond praise, and possibly he may have been superior to both Garrick and Kean in Macbeth, although it must be remembered that in it part of his inspiration must have been caught from Mrs Siddons. In all the other great Shakespearian characters he was, according to the best critics, inferior to them, least so in Lear, Hamlet and Wolsey, and most so in Shylock and Richard III. On account of the eccentricities of Sheridan, the proprietor of Drury Lane, Kemble withdrew from the management, and, although he resumed his duties at the beginning of the season 1800-1801, he at the close of 1802 finally resigned connexion with it. In 1803 he became manager of Covent Garden, in which he had acquired a sixth share for £23,000. The theatre was burned down on the 20th of September 1808, and the raising of the prices after the opening of the new theatre, in 1809, led to riots, which practically suspended the performances for three months. Kemble had been nearly ruined by the fire, and was only saved by a generous loan, afterwards converted into a gift, of £10,000 from the duke of Northumberland. Kemble took his final leave of the stage in the part of Coriolanus on the 23rd of June 1817. His retirement was probably hastened by the rising popularity of Edmund Kean. The remaining years of his life were spent chiefly abroad, and he died at Lausanne on the 26th of February 1823.
John Philip Kemble (1757-1823), the second child, was born in Prescot, Lancashire, on February 1, 1757. His mother was Roman Catholic, and he was educated at Sedgeley Park Catholic seminary, near Wolverhampton, and at the English college in Douai, with the intention of becoming a priest. However, after completing a four-year course, he realized he had no calling for the priesthood. He returned to England and joined the theatrical company of Crump & Chamberlain, making his first appearance as Theodosius in Lee’s tragedy of the same name at Wolverhampton on January 8, 1776. In 1778, he joined the York company of Tate Wilkinson, appearing in Wakefield as Captain Plume in Farquhar’s The Recruiting Officer; in Hull for the first time as Macbeth on October 30, and in York as Orestes in Ambrose Philips’s Distressed Mother. In 1781, he secured a “star” engagement in Dublin, making his first appearance there on November 2 as Hamlet. He also found great success as Raymond in The Count of Narbonne, a play based on Horace Walpole’s Castle of Otranto. Gradually, he built a strong reputation as a meticulous and polished actor, and this, along with his sister's growing fame, led to an engagement at Drury Lane, where he debuted on September 30, 1783, as Hamlet. In this role, he sparked interest and discussion among critics rather than rousing enthusiastic applause from the public. However, as Macbeth on March 31, 1785, he shared in the excitement stirred by Mrs. Siddons and established a reputation among contemporary actors second only to hers. The brother and sister first appeared together at Drury Lane on November 22, 1783, as Beverley and Mrs. Beverley in Moore’s The Gamester, and as King John and Constance in Shakespeare’s tragedy. The following year, they played Montgomerie and Matilda in Cumberland’s The Carmelite, and in 1785, Adorni and Camiola in Kemble’s adaptation of Massinger’s A Maid of Honour, and Othello and Desdemona. Between 1785 and 1787, Kemble took on various roles, with his portrayal of Mentevole in Jephson’s Julia making an overwhelming impression. On December 8, 1787, he married Priscilla Hopkins Brereton (1756-1845), a widow of an actor who was also an actress. Kemble’s appointment as manager of Drury Lane in 1788 allowed him to style characters more according to his own vision than longstanding traditions. He could also experiment with parts that appealed to him, and he embraced this privilege with more boldness than caution. His activity was immense, with a vast list of roles that included many Shakespearean characters as well as numerous parts in now forgotten plays. In his own version of Coriolanus, revived during his first season, the character of the “noble Roman” suited his talents so perfectly that he not only portrayed it with an unmatched perfection but reportedly allowed its influence to shape his private demeanor and speech. His tall and commanding presence, noble features, and serious and grave demeanor made him well-suited for the Roman characters in Shakespeare’s works; when depicting the gradual rise and development of a single overpowering passion, his performance gained an irresistible momentum and majestic force. His shortcoming was in flexibility, variety, and speed; his style was defined by method, regularity, precision, and meticulous attention to detail, grounded in a thorough psychological study of the specific character he portrayed. His skillful delivery, along with his keen sense of rhythm and emphasis, enabled him to excel in declamation, but physically he was unable to express impulsive fervor and deep pathos. In Coriolanus and Cato, he was outstanding, and he may have even surpassed both Garrick and Kean in Macbeth, though it must be acknowledged that part of his inspiration likely came from Mrs. Siddons. According to leading critics, he was generally seen as inferior to them in other great Shakespearean roles, least so in Lear, Hamlet, and Wolsey, and most so in Shylock and Richard III. Due to the whims of Sheridan, the owner of Drury Lane, Kemble withdrew from management. Although he resumed his duties at the start of the 1800-1801 season, he ultimately resigned from it at the end of 1802. In 1803, he became the manager of Covent Garden, buying a sixth share for £23,000. The theater burned down on September 20, 1808, and the increase in ticket prices after the new theater opened in 1809 led to riots that effectively halted performances for three months. Kemble was nearly ruined by the fire and was only saved by a generous loan of £10,000 from the Duke of Northumberland, later turned into a gift. Kemble made his final appearance on stage in the role of Coriolanus on June 23, 1817. His retirement was likely expedited by the rising popularity of Edmund Kean. He spent the remaining years of his life mainly abroad, passing away in Lausanne on February 26, 1823.
See Boaden, Life of John Philip Kemble (1825); Fitzgerald, The Kembles (1871).
See Boaden, Life of John Philip Kemble (1825); Fitzgerald, The Kembles (1871).
Stephen Kemble (1758-1822), the second son of Roger, was rather an indifferent actor, ever eclipsed by his wife and fellow player, Elizabeth Satchell Kemble (c. 1763-1841), and a man of such portly proportions that he played Falstaff without padding. He managed theatres in Edinburgh and elsewhere.
Stephen Kemble (1758-1822), the second son of Roger, was not a very impressive actor, always overshadowed by his wife and fellow performer, Elizabeth Satchell Kemble (c. 1763-1841). He was quite hefty, playing Falstaff without needing any extra padding. He managed theaters in Edinburgh and other places.
Charles Kemble (1775-1854), a younger brother of John Philip and Stephen, was born at Brecon, South Wales, on the 25th of November 1775. He, too, was educated at Douai. 724 After returning to England in 1792, he obtained a situation in the post-office, but this he soon resigned for the stage, making his first recorded appearance at Sheffield as Orlando in As You Like It in that year. During the early period of his career as an actor he made his way slowly to public favour. For a considerable time he played with his brother and sister, chiefly in secondary parts, and this with a grace and finish which received scant justice from the critics. His first London appearance was on the 21st of April 1794, as Malcolm to his brother’s Macbeth. Ultimately he won independent fame, especially in such characters as Archer in George Farquhar’s Beaux’ Stratagem, Dorincourt in Mrs Cowley’s Belle’s Stratagem, Charles Surface and Ranger in Dr Benjamin Hoadley’s Suspicious Husband. His Laertes and Macduff were hardly less interesting than his brother’s Hamlet and Macbeth. In comedy he was ably supported by his wife, Marie Therèse De Camp (1774-1838), whom he married on the 2nd of July 1806. His visit, with his daughter Fanny, to America during 1832 and 1834, aroused much enthusiasm. The later period of his career was clouded by money embarrassments in connexion with his joint proprietorship in Covent Garden theatre. He formally retired from the stage in December 1836, but his final appearance was on the 10th of April 1840. For some time he held the office of examiner of plays. In 1844-1845 he gave readings from Shakespeare at Willis’s Rooms. He died on the 12th of November 1854. Macready regarded his Cassio as incomparable, and summed him up as “a first-rate actor of second-rate parts.”
Charles Kemble (1775-1854), a younger brother of John Philip and Stephen, was born in Brecon, South Wales, on November 25, 1775. He was also educated at Douai. 724 After returning to England in 1792, he got a job at the post office, but he quickly left that for a career on stage, making his first recorded appearance in Sheffield as Orlando in As You Like It that same year. In the early part of his acting career, he gradually gained public favor. For a long time, he performed alongside his brother and sister, primarily in supporting roles, and though he brought grace and skill to these performances, critics didn’t always give him the recognition he deserved. His first appearance in London was on April 21, 1794, playing Malcolm to his brother’s Macbeth. Eventually, he achieved independent fame, particularly in roles like Archer in George Farquhar’s Beaux’ Stratagem, Dorincourt in Mrs. Cowley’s Belle’s Stratagem, and Charles Surface and Ranger in Dr. Benjamin Hoadley’s Suspicious Husband. His portrayals of Laertes and Macduff were just as compelling as his brother’s Hamlet and Macbeth. In comedy, he was well-supported by his wife, Marie Therèse De Camp (1774-1838), whom he married on July 2, 1806. His trip to America with his daughter Fanny in 1832 and 1834 generated a lot of excitement. The later part of his career was marked by financial troubles related to his co-ownership of Covent Garden Theatre. He officially retired from acting in December 1836, although he made his final appearance on April 10, 1840. For a time, he served as an examiner of plays. In 1844-1845, he held readings of Shakespeare at Willis’s Rooms. He passed away on November 12, 1854. Macready described his Cassio as unmatched and summed him up as “a first-rate actor of second-rate parts.”
See Gentleman’s Magazine, January 1855; Records of a Girlhood, by Frances Anne Kemble.
See Gentleman’s Magazine, January 1855; Records of a Girlhood, by Frances Anne Kemble.
Elizabeth Whitlock (1761-1836), who was a daughter of Roger Kemble, made her first appearance on the stage in 1783 at Drury Lane as Portia. In 1785 she married Charles E. Whitlock, went with him to America and played with much success there. She had the honour of appearing before President Washington. She seems to have retired about 1807, and she died on the 27th of February 1836. Her reputation as a tragic actress might have been greater had she not been Mrs Siddons’s sister.
Elizabeth Whitlock (1761-1836), the daughter of Roger Kemble, made her stage debut in 1783 at Drury Lane as Portia. In 1785, she married Charles E. Whitlock, moved to America with him, and enjoyed considerable success there. She had the honor of performing for President Washington. It seems she retired around 1807, and she passed away on February 27, 1836. Her reputation as a tragic actress might have been even stronger if she hadn't been the sister of Mrs. Siddons.
Frances Anne Kemble (Fanny Kemble) (1800-1893), the actress and author, was Charles Kemble’s elder daughter; she was born in London on the 27th of November 1809, and educated chiefly in France. She first appeared on the stage on the 25th of October 1829 as Juliet at Covent Garden. Her attractive personality at once made her a great favourite, her popularity enabling her father to recoup his losses as a manager. She played all the principal women’s parts, notably Portia, Beatrice and Lady Teazle, but Julia in Sheridan Knowles’s The Hunchback, especially written for her, was perhaps her greatest success. In 1832 she went with her father to America, and in 1834 she married there a Southern planter, Pierce Butler. They were divorced in 1849. In 1847 she returned to the stage, from which she had retired on her marriage, and later, following her father’s example, appeared with much success as a Shakespearian reader. In 1877 she returned to England, where she lived—using her maiden name—till her death in London on the 15th of January 1893. During this period Fanny Kemble was a prominent and popular figure in the social life of London. Besides her plays, Francis the First, unsuccessfully produced in 1832, The Star of Seville (1837), a volume of Poems (1844), and a book of Italian travel, A Year of Consolation (1847), she published a volume of her Journal in 1835, and in 1863 another (dealing with life on the Georgia plantation), and also a volume of Plays, including translations from Dumas and Schiller. These were followed by Records of a Girlhood (1878), Records of Later Life (1882), Notes on some of Shakespeare’s Plays (1882), Far Away and Long Ago (1889), and Further Records (1891). Her various volumes of reminiscences contain much valuable material for the social and dramatic history of the period.
Frances Anne Kemble (Fanny Kemble) (1800-1893), the actress and author, was Charles Kemble’s older daughter. She was born in London on November 27, 1809, and was mostly educated in France. She made her stage debut on October 25, 1829, as Juliet at Covent Garden. Her charming personality quickly made her a favorite, and her popularity helped her father recover his losses as a manager. She played all the major female roles, notably Portia, Beatrice, and Lady Teazle, but her greatest success was likely Julia in Sheridan Knowles’s The Hunchback, which was written specifically for her. In 1832, she traveled to America with her father, and in 1834, she married a Southern planter named Pierce Butler. They divorced in 1849. In 1847, she returned to the stage, from which she had stepped back after her marriage, and later, following her father’s footsteps, she found success as a Shakespearean reader. In 1877, she moved back to England, where she lived—using her maiden name—until her death in London on January 15, 1893. During this time, Fanny Kemble was a significant and popular figure in London’s social scene. Besides her plays, like Francis the First, which premiered unsuccessfully in 1832, The Star of Seville (1837), a collection of Poems (1844), and a travel book about Italy, A Year of Consolation (1847), she published a volume of her Journal in 1835, and another in 1863 (about her life on a Georgia plantation). She also published a collection of Plays, including translations from Dumas and Schiller. This was followed by Records of a Girlhood (1878), Records of Later Life (1882), Notes on some of Shakespeare’s Plays (1882), Far Away and Long Ago (1889), and Further Records (1891). Her various collections of memories contain valuable insights into the social and dramatic history of the time.
Adelaide Kemble (1814-1879), Charles Kemble’s second daughter, was an opera singer of great promise, whose first London appearance was made in Norma on the 2nd of November 1841. In 1843 she married Edward John Sartoris, a rich Italian, and retired after a brief but brilliant career. She wrote A Week in a French Country House (1867), a bright and humorous story, and of a literary quality not shared by other tales that followed. Her son, Algernon Charles Sartoris, married General U. S. Grant’s daughter.
Adelaide Kemble (1814-1879), the second daughter of Charles Kemble, was a highly talented opera singer. She made her debut in London in Norma on November 2, 1841. In 1843, she married Edward John Sartoris, a wealthy Italian, and retired after a short but impressive career. She wrote A Week in a French Country House (1867), a witty and entertaining story distinguished by its literary quality, unlike many other stories that followed. Her son, Algernon Charles Sartoris, married the daughter of General U. S. Grant.
Among more recent members of the Kemble family, mention may also be made of Charles Kemble’s grandson, Henry Kemble (1848-1907), a sterling and popular London actor.
Among more recent members of the Kemble family, we can also mention Charles Kemble’s grandson, Henry Kemble (1848-1907), a remarkable and well-liked actor in London.

KEMBLE, JOHN MITCHELL (1807-1857), English scholar and historian, eldest son of Charles Kemble the actor, was born in 1807. He received his education partly from Dr Richardson, author of the Dictionary of the English Language, and partly at the grammar school of Bury St Edmunds, where he obtained in 1826 an exhibition to Trinity College, Cambridge. At the university his historical essays gained him high reputation. The bent of his studies was turned more especially towards the Anglo-Saxon period through the influence of the brothers Grimm, under whom he studied at Göttingen (1831). His thorough knowledge of the Teutonic languages and his critical faculty were shown in his Beowulf (1833-1837), Über die Stammtafel der Westsachsen (1836), Codex Diplomaticus Aevi Saxonici (1839-1848), and in many contributions to reviews; while his History of the Saxons in England (1849; new ed. 1876), though it must now be read with caution, was the first attempt at a thorough examination of the original sources of the early period of English history. He was editor of the British and Foreign Review from 1835 to 1844; and from 1840 to his death was examiner of plays. In 1857 he published State Papers and Correspondence illustrative of the Social and Political State of Europe from the Revolution to the Accession of the House of Hanover. He died at Dublin on the 26th of March 1857. His Horae Ferales, or Studies in the Archaeology of Northern Nations, was completed by Dr R. G. Latham, and published in 1864. He married the daughter of Professor Amadeus Wendt of Göttingen in 1836; and had two daughters and a son; the elder daughter was the wife of Sir Charles Santley, the singer.
KEMBLE, JOHN MITCHELL (1807-1857), English scholar and historian, the eldest son of actor Charles Kemble, was born in 1807. He received part of his education from Dr. Richardson, the author of the Dictionary of the English Language, and partly at the grammar school in Bury St Edmunds, where he gained an exhibition to Trinity College, Cambridge in 1826. At university, his historical essays earned him a great reputation. His studies particularly focused on the Anglo-Saxon period, largely influenced by the brothers Grimm, under whom he studied at Göttingen in 1831. His deep understanding of the Teutonic languages and his critical abilities were evident in his works, such as Beowulf (1833-1837), Über die Stammtafel der Westsachsen (1836), Codex Diplomaticus Aevi Saxonici (1839-1848), and many contributions to reviews. His History of the Saxons in England (1849; new ed. 1876), although it should now be read cautiously, was the first thorough examination of the original sources of early English history. He served as the editor of the British and Foreign Review from 1835 to 1844, and from 1840 until his death, he was an examiner of plays. In 1857, he published State Papers and Correspondence illustrative of the Social and Political State of Europe from the Revolution to the Accession of the House of Hanover. He passed away in Dublin on March 26, 1857. His Horae Ferales, or Studies in the Archaeology of Northern Nations was completed by Dr. R. G. Latham and published in 1864. He married the daughter of Professor Amadeus Wendt of Göttingen in 1836, and they had two daughters and a son; the elder daughter became the wife of Sir Charles Santley, the singer.

KEMÉNY, ZSIGMOND, Baron (1816-1875), Hungarian author, came of a noble but reduced family. In 1837 he studied jurisprudence at Marosvásárhely, but soon devoted himself entirely to journalism and literature. His first unfinished work, On the Causes of the Disaster of Mohacs (1840), attracted much attention. In the same year he studied natural history and anatomy at Vienna University. In 1841, along with Lajos Kovács, he edited the Transylvanian newspaper Erdélyi Hiradó. He also took an active part in provincial politics and warmly supported the principles of Count Stephen Széchenyi. In 1846 he moved to Pest, where his pamphlet, Korteskedés és ellenszerei (Partisanship and its Antidote), had already made him famous. Here he consorted with the most eminent of the moderate reformers, and for a time was on the staff of the Pesti Hirlap. The same year he brought out his first great novel, Pál Gyulay. He was elected a member of the revolutionary diet of 1848 and accompanied it through all its vicissitudes. After a brief exile he accepted the amnesty and returned to Hungary. Careless of his unpopularity, he took up his pen to defend the cause of justice and moderation, and in his two pamphlets, Forradalom után (After the Revolution) and Még egysz ó a forradalom után (One word more after the Revolution), he defended the point of view which was realized by Deák in 1867. He subsequently edited the Pesti Napló, which became virtually Deák’s political organ. Kemény also published several political essays (e.g. The Two Wesselényis, and Stephen Szechenyi) which are among the best of their kind in any literature. His novels published during these years, such as Férj és nö (Husband and Wife), Szivörvényei (The Heart’s Secrets), &c., also won for him a foremost rank among contemporary novelists. During the ’sixties Kemény took an active part in the political labours of Deák, whose right hand he continued to be, and popularized the Composition of 1867 which he had done so much to bring about. He was elected to the diet of 1867 for one of the divisions of Pest, but took no part in the debates. The last years of his life were passed in complete seclusion in Transylvania. To the works of Kemény already 725 mentioned should be added the fine historical novel Rajongok (The Fanatics) (Pest, 1858-1859), and Collected Speeches (Hung.) (Pest, 1889).
KEMÉNY, ZSIGMOND, Baron (1816-1875), Hungarian author, came from a noble but diminished family. In 1837, he studied law at Marosvásárhely but soon dedicated himself completely to journalism and literature. His first unfinished piece, On the Causes of the Disaster of Mohacs (1840), drew a lot of attention. That same year, he studied natural history and anatomy at the University of Vienna. In 1841, along with Lajos Kovács, he edited the Transylvanian newspaper Erdélyi Hiradó. He was also actively involved in local politics and strongly supported the principles of Count Stephen Széchenyi. In 1846, he moved to Pest, where his pamphlet, Korteskedés és ellenszerei (Partisanship and its Antidote), had already made him famous. There, he mingled with leading moderate reformers and briefly worked for the Pesti Hirlap. That same year, he published his first major novel, Pál Gyulay. He was elected a member of the revolutionary diet of 1848 and went through all its ups and downs. After a short exile, he accepted amnesty and returned to Hungary. Unconcerned about his unpopularity, he took up his pen to defend justice and moderation, and in his two pamphlets, Forradalom után (After the Revolution) and Még egysz ó a forradalom után (One More Word after the Revolution), he supported the viewpoint that Deák realized in 1867. He later edited the Pesti Napló, which effectively became Deák’s political mouthpiece. Kemény also published several political essays (e.g., The Two Wesselényis, and Stephen Szechenyi) that are among the best of their kind in any literature. His novels published during these years, like Férj és nö (Husband and Wife), Szivörvényei (The Heart’s Secrets), etc., also earned him a top spot among contemporary novelists. During the 1860s, Kemény actively participated in the political work of Deák, remaining his right-hand man, and made the Composition of 1867 more popular, which he had significantly contributed to. He was elected to the diet of 1867 for one of the divisions of Pest but did not take part in the debates. The last years of his life were spent in total seclusion in Transylvania. To the works of Kemény already mentioned should be added the excellent historical novel Rajongok (The Fanatics) (Pest, 1858-1859), and Collected Speeches (Hung.) (Pest, 1889).
See L. Nogrady, Baron Sigismund Kemény’s Life and Writings (Hung.) (Budapest, 1902); G. Beksics, Sigismund Kemény, the Revolution and the Composition (Hung.) (Budapest, 1888).
See L. Nogrady, Baron Sigismund Kemény’s Life and Writings (Hung.) (Budapest, 1902); G. Beksics, Sigismund Kemény, the Revolution and the Composition (Hung.) (Budapest, 1888).

KEMP, WILLIAM (fl. 1600), English actor and dancer. He probably began his career as a member of the earl of Leicester’s company, but his name first appears after the death of Leicester in a list of players authorized by an order of the privy council in 1593 to play 7 m. out of London. Ferdinand Stanley, Lord Strange, was the patron of the company of which Kemp was the leading member until 1598, and in 1594 was summoned with Burbage and Shakespeare to act before the queen at Greenwich. He was the successor, both in parts and reputation, of Richard Tarlton. But it was as a dancer of jigs that he won his greatest popularity, one or two actors dancing and singing with him, and the words doubtless often being improvised. Examples of the music may be seen in the MS. collection of John Dowland now in the Cambridge University library. At the same time Kemp was given parts like Dogberry, and Peter in Romeo and Juliet; indeed his name appears by accident in place of those of the characters in early copies. Kemp seems to have exhibited his dancing on the Continent, but in 1602 he was a member of the earl of Worcester’s players, and Philip Henslowe’s diary shows several payments made to him in that year.
KEMP, WILLIAM (fl. 1600), English actor and dancer. He probably started his career as a member of the earl of Leicester’s company, but his name first appears after Leicester's death in a list of actors authorized by a privy council order in 1593 to perform 7 miles outside of London. Ferdinand Stanley, Lord Strange, was the patron of the company where Kemp was the leading member until 1598, and in 1594, he was called along with Burbage and Shakespeare to perform before the queen at Greenwich. He succeeded Richard Tarlton in both roles and reputation. However, he became most popular for his jig dancing, often performing with one or two other actors who would sing along, likely improvising the lyrics. Examples of the music can be found in the manuscript collection of John Dowland currently housed in the Cambridge University library. At the same time, Kemp was given roles such as Dogberry and Peter in Romeo and Juliet; in fact, his name appears by mistake instead of the character names in early copies. It seems Kemp showcased his dancing on the Continent, but in 1602 he was part of the earl of Worcester’s players, and Philip Henslowe’s diary indicates several payments made to him that year.

KEMPE, JOHN (c. 1380-1454), English cardinal, archbishop of Canterbury, and chancellor, was son of Thomas Kempe, a gentleman of Ollantigh, in the parish of Wye near Ashford, Kent. He was born about 1380 and educated at Merton College, Oxford. He practised as an ecclesiastical lawyer, was an assessor at the trial of Oldcastle, and in 1415 was made dean of the Court of Arches. Then he passed into the royal service, and being employed in the administration of Normandy was eventually made chancellor of the duchy. Early in 1419 he was elected bishop of Rochester, and was consecrated at Rouen on the 3rd of December. In February 1421 he was translated to Chichester, and in November following to London. During the minority of Henry VI. Kempe had a prominent position in the English council as a supporter of Henry Beaufort, whom he succeeded as chancellor in March 1426. In this same year he was promoted to the archbishopric of York. Kempe held office as chancellor for six years; his main task in government was to keep Humphrey of Gloucester in check. His resignation on the 28th of February 1432 was a concession to Gloucester. He still enjoyed Beaufort’s favour, and retaining his place in the council was employed on important missions, especially at the congress of Arras in 1435, and the conference at Calais in 1438. In December 1439 he was created cardinal, and during the next few years took less share in politics. He supported Suffolk over the king’s marriage with Margaret of Anjou; but afterwards there arose some difference between them, due in part to a dispute about the nomination of the cardinal’s nephew, Thomas Kempe, to the bishopric of London. At the time of Suffolk’s fall in January 1450 Kempe once more became chancellor. His appointment may have been due to the fact that he was not committed entirely to either party. In spite of his age and infirmity he showed some vigour in dealing with Cade’s rebellion, and by his official experience and skill did what he could for four years to sustain the king’s authority. He was rewarded by his translation to Canterbury in July 1452, when Pope Nicholas added as a special honour the title of cardinal-bishop of Santa Rufina. As Richard of York gained influence, Kempe became unpopular; men called him “the cursed cardinal,” and his fall seemed imminent when he died suddenly on the 22nd of March 1454. He was buried at Canterbury, in the choir. Kempe was a politician first, and hardly at all a bishop; and he was accused with some justice of neglecting his dioceses, especially at York. Still he was a capable official, and a faithful servant to Henry VI., who called him “one of the wisest lords of the land” (Paston Letters, i. 315). He founded a college at his native place at Wye, which was suppressed at the Reformation.
KEMPE, JOHN (c. 1380-1454), English cardinal, archbishop of Canterbury, and chancellor, was the son of Thomas Kempe, a gentleman from Ollantigh, in the parish of Wye near Ashford, Kent. He was born around 1380 and educated at Merton College, Oxford. He worked as an ecclesiastical lawyer, served as an assessor in the trial of Oldcastle, and in 1415 became dean of the Court of Arches. He then moved into royal service and, while working in the administration of Normandy, was eventually made chancellor of the duchy. Early in 1419, he was elected bishop of Rochester and was consecrated in Rouen on December 3rd. In February 1421, he was promoted to Chichester and in November of the same year to London. During Henry VI's minority, Kempe held a significant position in the English council as a supporter of Henry Beaufort, eventually succeeding him as chancellor in March 1426. That same year, he was promoted to the archbishopric of York. Kempe served as chancellor for six years, mainly focusing on keeping Humphrey of Gloucester in check. His resignation on February 28, 1432, was a concession to Gloucester. He maintained Beaufort’s favor and continued to be involved in the council, undertaking important missions, especially at the congress of Arras in 1435 and the conference at Calais in 1438. In December 1439, he was made a cardinal, and in the following years, he played a lesser role in politics. He supported Suffolk regarding the king’s marriage to Margaret of Anjou; however, they later had disagreements, partly over the nomination of Kempe’s nephew, Thomas Kempe, to the bishopric of London. When Suffolk fell from power in January 1450, Kempe became chancellor again. His appointment might have been influenced by his neutrality between the factions. Despite his age and health issues, he showed some determination in addressing Cade’s rebellion and used his official experience and skills to uphold the king’s authority for four years. He was rewarded with the archbishopric of Canterbury in July 1452, when Pope Nicholas also granted him the special title of cardinal-bishop of Santa Rufina. As Richard of York grew more influential, Kempe became less popular; people began calling him “the cursed cardinal,” and his downfall seemed imminent when he died suddenly on March 22, 1454. He was buried at Canterbury, in the choir. Kempe was primarily a politician and not much of a bishop; he was justly accused of neglecting his dioceses, especially at York. Nonetheless, he was a competent official and a loyal servant to Henry VI., who referred to him as “one of the wisest lords of the land” (Paston Letters, i. 315). He founded a college in his hometown of Wye, which was dissolved during the Reformation.
For contemporary authorities see under Henry VI. See also J. Raine’s Historians of the Church of York, vol. ii.; W. Dugdale’s Monasticon, iii. 254, vi. 1430-1432; and W. F. Hook’s Lives of Archbishops of Canterbury, v. 188-267.
For current references, see under Henry VI. Also check out J. Raine’s Historians of the Church of York, vol. ii.; W. Dugdale’s Monasticon, iii. 254, vi. 1430-1432; and W. F. Hook’s Lives of Archbishops of Canterbury, v. 188-267.

KEMPEN, a town in the Prussian Rhine Province, 40 m. N. of Cologne by the railway to Zevenaar. Pop. (1900), 6319. It has a monument to Thomas à Kempis, who was born there. The industries are considerable, and include silk-weaving, glass-making and the manufacture of electrical plant. Kempen belonged in the middle ages to the archbishopric of Cologne and received civic rights in 1294. It is memorable as the scene of a victory gained, on the 17th of January 1642, by the French and Hessians over the Imperialists.
KEMPEN, is a town in the Prussian Rhine Province, 40 miles north of Cologne by the train to Zevenaar. Population (1900): 6,319. It features a monument to Thomas à Kempis, who was born here. The town has significant industries, including silk weaving, glass making, and the production of electrical equipment. In the Middle Ages, Kempen was part of the archbishopric of Cologne and was granted city rights in 1294. It’s notable for being the site of a victory on January 17, 1642, when the French and Hessians defeated the Imperialists.
See Terwelp, Die Stadt Kempen (Kempen, 1894), and Niessen, Heimatkunde des Kreises Kempen (Crefeld, 1895).
See Terwelp, Die Stadt Kempen (Kempen, 1894), and Niessen, Heimatkunde des Kreises Kempen (Crefeld, 1895).

KEMPENFELT, RICHARD (1718-1782), British rear-admiral, was born at Westminster in 1718. His father, a Swede, is said to have been in the service of James II., and subsequently to have entered the British army. Richard Kempenfelt went into the navy, and saw his first service in the West Indies, taking part in the capture of Portobello. In 1746 he returned to England, and from that date to 1780, when he was made rear-admiral, saw active service in the East Indies with Sir George Pocock and in various quarters of the world. In 1781 he gained, with a vastly inferior force, a brilliant victory, fifty leagues south-west of Ushant, over the French fleet under De Guichen, capturing twenty prizes. In 1782 he hoisted his flag on the “Royal George,” which formed part of the fleet under Lord Howe. In August this fleet was ordered to refit at top speed at Portsmouth, and proceed to the relief of Gibraltar. A leak having been located below the waterline of the “Royal George,” the vessel was careened to allow of the defect being repaired. According to the version of the disaster favoured by the Admiralty, she was overturned by a breeze. But the general opinion of the navy was that the shifting of her weights was more than the old and rotten timbers of the “Royal George” could stand. A large piece of her bottom fell out, and she went down at once. It is estimated that not fewer than 800 persons went down with her, for besides the crew there were a large number of tradesmen, women and children on board. Kempenfelt, who was in his cabin, perished with the rest. Cowper’s poem, the “Loss of the Royal George,” commemorates this disaster. Kempenfelt effected radical alterations and improvements in the signalling system then existing in the British navy. A painting of the loss of the “Royal George” is in the Royal United Service Institution, London.
Kempentfelt, Richard (1718-1782), was a British rear-admiral born in Westminster in 1718. His father, who was Swedish, is said to have served under James II before joining the British army. Richard Kempenfelt joined the navy and had his first deployment in the West Indies, participating in the capture of Portobello. In 1746, he returned to England and served actively in the East Indies under Sir George Pocock and in various locations around the world until 1780, when he was promoted to rear-admiral. In 1781, he achieved a remarkable victory with a much smaller fleet against the French under De Guichen, capturing twenty vessels fifty leagues southwest of Ushant. In 1782, he raised his flag on the “Royal George,” part of the fleet commanded by Lord Howe. In August, the fleet was ordered to quickly refit in Portsmouth and then to help relieve Gibraltar. A leak was found below the waterline of the “Royal George,” and the ship was tilted to make repairs. According to the account preferred by the Admiralty, she capsized due to a gust of wind. However, the general consensus in the navy was that the shifting of her weights was too much for the old and rotting structure of the “Royal George.” A significant section of her bottom fell out, and she sank immediately. It’s estimated that at least 800 people went down with her, including not just the crew but also many tradesmen, women, and children on board. Kempenfelt, who was in his cabin, perished along with them. Cowper's poem, “The Loss of the Royal George,” commemorates this tragedy. Kempenfelt made significant changes and improvements to the signaling system used by the British navy at the time. A painting depicting the loss of the “Royal George” is located at the Royal United Service Institution in London.
See Charnock’s Biog. Nav., vi. 246, and Ralfe’s Naval Biographies, i. 215.
See Charnock’s Biog. Nav., vi. 246, and Ralfe’s Naval Biographies, i. 215.

KEMPT, SIR JAMES (1764-1854), British soldier, was gazetted to the 101st Foot in India in 1783, but on its disbandment two years later was placed on half-pay. It is said that he took a clerkship in Greenwood’s, the army agents (afterwards Cox & Co.). He attracted the notice of the Duke of York, through whom he obtained a captaincy (very soon followed by a majority) in the newly raised 113th Foot. But it was not long before his regiment experienced the fate of the old 101st; this time however Kempt was retained on full pay in the recruiting service. In 1799 he accompanied Sir Ralph Abercromby to Holland, and later to Egypt as an aide-de-camp. After Abercromby’s death Kempt remained on his successor’s staff until the end of the campaign in Egypt. In April 1803 he joined the staff of Sir David Dundas, but next month returned to regimental duty, and a little later received a lieutenant-colonelcy in the 81st Foot. With his new regiment he went, under Craig, to the Mediterranean theatre of operations, and at Maida the light brigade led by him bore the heaviest share of the battle. Employed from 1807 to 1811 on the staff in North America, Brevet-Colonel Kempt at the end of 1811 joined Wellington’s army in Spain with the local rank of major-general, which was, on the 1st of January 1812, made substantive. As one of Picton’s brigadiers, Kempt took part in the great assault on Badajoz and was severely wounded. On rejoining for duty, he was posted to the command of a brigade of the Light Division (43rd, 52nd and 95th Rifles), 726 which he led at Vera, the Nivelle (where he was again wounded), Bayonne, Orthez and Toulouse. Early in 1815 he was made K.C.B., and in July for his services at Waterloo, G.C.B. At that battle he commanded the 28th, 32nd and 79th as a brigadier under his old chief, Picton, and on Picton’s death succeeded to the command of his division. From 1828 to 1830 he was Governor-General of Canada, and at a critical time displayed firmness and moderation. He was afterwards Master-General of the Ordnance. At the time of his death in 1854 he had been for some years a full General.
KEMPT, SIR JAMES (1764-1854), a British soldier, was appointed to the 101st Foot in India in 1783, but when it was disbanded two years later, he was put on half-pay. It's said that he took a clerk job at Greenwood’s, the army agents (later known as Cox & Co.). He caught the attention of the Duke of York, through whom he got a captaincy (quickly followed by a majority) in the newly formed 113th Foot. However, it wasn’t long before his regiment faced the same fate as the old 101st; this time, though, Kempt stayed on full pay while in the recruiting service. In 1799, he accompanied Sir Ralph Abercromby to Holland and later to Egypt as an aide-de-camp. After Abercromby died, Kempt remained on his successor’s staff until the end of the Egyptian campaign. In April 1803, he joined Sir David Dundas’s staff, but returned to regimental duty the following month and soon after received a lieutenant-colonelcy in the 81st Foot. With his new regiment, he went to the Mediterranean under Craig, and at Maida, his light brigade took on the heaviest part of the battle. From 1807 to 1811, Brevet-Colonel Kempt was on staff duty in North America, and by the end of 1811, he joined Wellington’s army in Spain with the local rank of major-general, which became permanent on January 1, 1812. As one of Picton’s brigadiers, Kempt participated in the significant assault on Badajoz and was seriously wounded. When he returned to duty, he was assigned to command a brigade of the Light Division (43rd, 52nd, and 95th Rifles), 726 which he led at Vera, the Nivelle (where he was wounded again), Bayonne, Orthez, and Toulouse. Early in 1815, he was made K.C.B., and in July, for his services at Waterloo, G.C.B. At that battle, he commanded the 28th, 32nd, and 79th as a brigadier under his old chief, Picton, and after Picton’s death, he took over command of his division. From 1828 to 1830, he served as Governor-General of Canada, where he showed firmness and moderation during a critical period. He later became Master-General of the Ordnance. When he died in 1854, he had been a full General for several years.

KEMPTEN, a town in the kingdom of Bavaria on the Iller, 81 m. S.W. of Munich by rail. Pop. (1905), 20,663. The town is well built, has many spacious squares and attractive public grounds, and contains a castle, a handsome town-hall, a gymnasium, &c. The old palace of the abbots of Kempten, dating from the end of the 17th century, is now partly used as barracks, and near to it is the fine abbey church. The industries include wool-spinning and weaving and the manufacture of paper, beer, machines, hosiery and matches. As the commercial centre of the Algäu, Kempten carries on active trade in timber and dairy produce. Numerous remains have been discovered on the Lindenberg, a hill in the vicinity.
Kempten, is a town in the kingdom of Bavaria located on the Iller River, 81 km southwest of Munich by train. The population (1905) was 20,663. The town is well-designed, featuring spacious squares and attractive public parks, and includes a castle, a beautiful town hall, a gymnasium, and more. The old palace of the abbots of Kempten, built at the end of the 17th century, is now partly used as barracks, and nearby is the impressive abbey church. Local industries include wool spinning and weaving, as well as the production of paper, beer, machinery, hosiery, and matches. As the commercial hub of the Algäu region, Kempten has a busy trade in timber and dairy products. Many archaeological remains have been found on Lindenberg, a nearby hill.
Kempten, identified with the Roman Cambodunum, consisted in early times of two towns, the old and the new. The continual hostility that existed between these was intensified by the welcome given by the old town, a free imperial city since 1289, to the Reformed doctrines, the new town keeping to the older faith. The Benedictine abbey of Kempten, said to have been founded in 773 by Hildegarde, the wife of Charlemagne, was an important house. In 1360 its abbot was promoted to the dignity of a prince of the Empire by the emperor Charles IV.; the town and abbey passed to Bavaria in 1803. Here the Austrians defeated the French on the 17th of September 1796.
Kempten, known in Roman times as Cambodunum, was made up of two towns in its early days: the old town and the new town. The ongoing conflict between them was heightened by the old town's acceptance of the Reformed doctrines, while the new town stuck to the traditional faith. The Benedictine abbey of Kempten, believed to have been established in 773 by Hildegarde, the wife of Charlemagne, was a significant institution. In 1360, its abbot was elevated to the rank of a prince of the Empire by Emperor Charles IV.; the town and abbey were transferred to Bavaria in 1803. On September 17, 1796, the Austrians defeated the French here.
See Förderreuther, Die Stadt Kempten und ihre Umgebung (Kempten, 1901); Haggenmüller, Geschichte der Stadt und der gefürsteten Grafschaft Kempten, vol. i. (Kempten, 1840); and Meirhofer, Geschichtliche Darstellung der denkwürdigsten Schicksale der Stadt Kempten (Kempten, 1856).
See Förderreuther, The City of Kempten and Its Surroundings (Kempten, 1901); Haggenmüller, History of the City and the Principality of Kempten, vol. i. (Kempten, 1840); and Meirhofer, Historical Account of the Most Significant Events of the City of Kempten (Kempten, 1856).

KEN, THOMAS (1637-1711), the most eminent of the English non-juring bishops, and one of the fathers of modern English hymnology, was born at Little Berkhampstead, Herts, in 1637. He was the son of Thomas Ken of Furnival’s Inn, who belonged to an ancient stock,—that of the Kens of Ken Place, in Somersetshire; his mother was a daughter of the now forgotten poet, John Chalkhill, who is called by Walton an “acquaintant and friend of Edmund Spenser.” Ken’s step-sister, Anne, was married to Izaak Walton in 1646, a connexion which brought Ken from his boyhood under the refining influence of this gentle and devout man. In 1652 Ken entered Winchester College, and in 1656 became a student of Hart Hall, Oxford. He gained a fellowship at New College in 1657, and proceeded B.A. in 1661 and M.A. in 1664. He was for some time tutor of his college; but the most characteristic reminiscence of his university life is the mention made by Anthony Wood that in the musical gatherings of the time “Thomas Ken of New College, a junior, would be sometimes among them, and sing his part.” Ordained in 1662, he successively held the livings of Little Easton in Essex, Brighstone (sometimes called Brixton) in the Isle of Wight, and East Woodhay in Hampshire; in 1672 he resigned the last of these, and returned to Winchester, being by this time a prebendary of the cathedral, and chaplain to the bishop, as well as a fellow of Winchester College. He remained there for several years, acting as curate in one of the lowest districts, preparing his Manual of Prayers for the use of the Scholars of Winchester College (first published in 1674), and composing hymns. It was at this time that he wrote, primarily for the same body as his prayers, his morning, evening and midnight hymns, the first two of which, beginning “Awake, my soul, and with the sun” and “Glory to Thee, my God, this night,” are now household words wherever the English tongue is spoken. The latter is often made to begin with the line “All praise to Thee, my God, this night,” but in the earlier editions over which Ken had control, the line is as first given.1 In 1674 Ken paid a visit to Rome in company with young Izaak Walton, and this journey seems mainly to have resulted in confirming his regard for the Anglican communion. In 1679 he was appointed by Charles II. chaplain to the Princess Mary, wife of William of Orange. While with the court at the Hague, he incurred the displeasure of William by insisting that a promise of marriage, made to an English lady of high birth by a relative of the prince, should be kept; and he therefore gladly returned to England in 1680, when he was immediately appointed one of the king’s chaplains. He was once more residing at Winchester in 1683 when Charles came to the city with his doubtfully composed court, and his residence was chosen as the home of Nell Gwynne; but Ken stoutly objected to this arrangement, and succeeded in making the favourite find quarters elsewhere. In August of this same year he accompanied Lord Dartmouth to Tangier as chaplain to the fleet, and Pepys, who was one of the company, has left on record some quaint and kindly reminiscences of him and of his services on board. The fleet returned in April 1684, and a few months after, upon a vacancy occurring in the see of Bath and Wells, Ken, now Dr Ken, was appointed bishop. It is said that, upon the occurrence of the vacancy, Charles, mindful of the spirit he had shown at Winchester, exclaimed, “Where is the good little man that refused his lodging to poor Nell?” and determined that no other should be bishop. The consecration took place at Lambeth on the 25th of January 1685; and one of Ken’s first duties was to attend the deathbed of Charles, where his wise and faithful ministrations won the admiration of everybody except Bishop Burnet. In this year he published his Exposition on the Church Catechism, perhaps better known by its sub-title, The Practice of Divine Love. In 1688, when James reissued his “Declaration of Indulgence,” Ken was one of the “seven bishops” who refused to publish it. He was probably influenced by two considerations: first, by his profound aversion from Roman Catholicism, to which he felt he would be giving some episcopal recognition by compliance; but, second and more especially, by the feeling that James was compromising the spiritual freedom of the church. Along with his six brethren, Ken was committed to the Tower on the 8th of June 1688, on a charge of high misdemeanour; the trial, which took place on the 29th and 30th of the month, and which resulted in a verdict of acquittal, is matter of history. With the revolution which speedily followed this impolitic trial, new troubles encountered Ken; for, having sworn allegiance to James, he thought himself thereby precluded from taking the oath to William of Orange. Accordingly, he took his place among the non-jurors, and, as he stood firm to his refusal, he was, in August 1691, superseded in his bishopric by Dr Kidder, dean of Peterborough. From this time he lived mostly in retirement, finding a congenial home with Lord Weymouth, his friend from college days, at Longleat in Wiltshire; and though pressed to resume his diocese in 1703, upon the death of Bishop Kidder, he declined, partly on the ground of growing weakness, but partly no doubt from his love for the quiet life of devotion which he was able to lead at Longleat. His death took place there on the 19th of March 1711.
KEN, THOMAS (1637-1711), the most prominent of the English non-juring bishops, and one of the founders of modern English hymn writing, was born in Little Berkhampstead, Herts, in 1637. He was the son of Thomas Ken from Furnival's Inn, who came from a long-standing family—the Kens of Ken Place in Somersetshire; his mother was a daughter of the now forgotten poet John Chalkhill, described by Walton as an “acquaintant and friend of Edmund Spenser.” Ken’s step-sister, Anne, married Izaak Walton in 1646, which brought Ken under the nurturing influence of this gentle and devout man from a young age. In 1652, Ken entered Winchester College, and in 1656, he became a student at Hart Hall, Oxford. He earned a fellowship at New College in 1657 and completed his B.A. in 1661 and M.A. in 1664. He served as a tutor at his college for some time; however, the most notable memory of his university life is Anthony Wood’s mention that at musical gatherings of the time, “Thomas Ken of New College, a junior, would sometimes be among them and sing his part.” Ordained in 1662, he held various positions, including Little Easton in Essex, Brighstone (sometimes called Brixton) in the Isle of Wight, and East Woodhay in Hampshire. In 1672, he gave up the last of these and returned to Winchester, where he had by then become a prebendary of the cathedral, chaplain to the bishop, and a fellow of Winchester College. He stayed there for several years, serving as a curate in one of the lower districts, preparing his Manual of Prayers for the use of the Scholars of Winchester College (first published in 1674), and writing hymns. During this time, he wrote morning, evening, and midnight hymns primarily intended for the same audience as his prayers, the first two of which, starting with “Awake, my soul, and with the sun” and “Glory to Thee, my God, this night,” are now well-known phrases wherever English is spoken. The latter often begins with “All praise to Thee, my God, this night,” but in the earlier editions overseen by Ken, the line is as it was first given.
Although Ken wrote much poetry, besides his hymns, he cannot be called a great poet; but he had that fine combination of spiritual insight and feeling with poetic taste which marks all great hymn-writers. As a hymn-writer he has had few equals in England; it can scarcely be said that even Keble, though possessed of much rarer poetic gifts, surpassed him in his own sphere (see Hymns). In his own day he took high rank as a pulpit orator, and even royalty had to beg for a seat amongst his audiences; but his sermons are now forgotten. He lives in history, apart from his three hymns, mainly as a man of unstained purity and invincible fidelity to conscience, weak only in a certain narrowness of view which is a frequent attribute of the intense character which he possessed. As an ecclesiastic he was a High Churchman of the old school.
Although Ken wrote a lot of poetry, in addition to his hymns, he can't really be considered a great poet; however, he had that wonderful mix of spiritual insight and emotion with poetic taste that defines all great hymn writers. As a hymn writer, he had few equals in England; it could hardly be said that even Keble, who had much rarer poetic talents, surpassed him in his own field (see Hymns). In his time, he was highly regarded as a preacher, and even royalty had to ask for a seat among his audiences; but his sermons are now forgotten. He is remembered in history, aside from his three hymns, mainly as a man of unblemished purity and unwavering commitment to his conscience, though he was somewhat limited by a narrow perspective, which is often a trait of intense personalities like his. As a churchman, he was a High Churchman of the traditional kind.
Ken’s poetical works were published in collected form in four volumes by W. Hawkins, his relative and executor, in 1721; his prose 727 works were issued in 1838 in one volume, under the editorship of J. T. Round. A brief memoir was prefixed by Hawkins to a selection from Ken’s works which he published in 1713; and a life, in two volumes, by the Rev. W. L. Bowles, appeared in 1830. But the standard biographies of Ken are those of J. Lavicount Anderdon (The Life of Thomas Ken, Bishop of Bath and Wells, by a Layman, 1851; 2nd ed., 1854) and of Dean Plumptre (2 vols., 1888; revised, 1890). See also the Rev. W. Hunt’s article in the Dict. Nat. Biog.
Ken’s poetry was published in a four-volume collection by W. Hawkins, who was his relative and executor, in 1721. His prose was released in 1838 in a single volume, edited by J. T. Round. Hawkins included a brief memoir with a selection of Ken’s works that he published in 1713, and a biography in two volumes was written by Rev. W. L. Bowles in 1830. However, the main biographies of Ken are those by J. Lavicount Anderdon (The Life of Thomas Ken, Bishop of Bath and Wells, by a Layman, 1851; 2nd ed., 1854) and Dean Plumptre (2 vols., 1888; revised, 1890). Also, refer to Rev. W. Hunt’s article in the Dict. Nat. Biog.
1 The fact, however, that in 1712—only a year after Ken’s death—his publisher, Brome, published the hymn with the opening words “All praise,” has been deemed by such a high authority as the 1st earl of Selborne sufficient evidence that the alteration had Ken’s authority.
1 The fact that in 1712—just a year after Ken’s death—his publisher, Brome, released the hymn starting with the words “All praise,” has been considered by a notable figure like the 1st earl of Selborne as enough proof that the change had Ken’s approval.


KENA, or Keneh (sometimes written Qina), a town of Upper Egypt on a canal about a mile E. of the Nile and 380 m. S.S.E. of Cairo by rail. Pop. (1907), 20,069. Kena, the capital of a province of the same name, was called by the Greeks Caene or Caenepolis (probably the Νέη πόλις of Herodotus; see Akhmim) in distinction from Coptos (q.v.), 15 m. S., to whose trade it eventually succeeded. It is a remarkable fact that its modern name should be derived from a purely Greek word, like Iskenderia from Alexandria, and Nekrāsh from Naucratis; in the absence of any known Egyptian name it seems to point to Kena having originated in a foreign settlement in connexion with the Red Sea trade. It is a flourishing town, specially noted for the manufacture of the porous water jars and bottles used throughout Egypt. The clay for making them is obtained from a valley north of Kena. The pottery is sent down the Nile in specially constructed boats. Kena is also known for the excellence of the dates sold in its bazaars and for the large colony of dancing girls who live there. It carries on a trade in grain and dates with Arabia, via Kosseir on the Red Sea, 100 m. E. in a direct line. This inconsiderable traffic is all that is left of the extensive commerce formerly maintained—chiefly via Berenice and Coptos—between Upper Egypt and India and Arabia. The road to Kosseir is one of great antiquity. It leads through the valley of Hammāmāt, celebrated for its ancient breccia quarries and deserted gold mines. During the British operations in Egypt in 1801 Sir David Baird and his force marched along this road to Kena, taking sixteen days on the journey from Kosseir.
KENA, or Keneh (sometimes written Qina), is a town in Upper Egypt located on a canal about a mile east of the Nile and 380 miles south-southeast of Cairo by rail. The population was 20,069 in 1907. Kena, the capital of a province with the same name, was referred to by the Greeks as Caene or Caenepolis (likely the Νέα πόλη mentioned by Herodotus; see Akhmim) to distinguish it from Coptos (q.v.), located 15 miles south, which it eventually replaced in terms of trade. It's interesting that the modern name comes from a purely Greek word, similar to how Iskenderia derives from Alexandria and Nekrāsh from Naucratis; this suggests that Kena may have originated from a foreign settlement connected to Red Sea trade, as there’s no known Egyptian name. It’s a thriving town, particularly famous for making the porous water jars and bottles used across Egypt. The clay for these is sourced from a valley north of Kena. The pottery is shipped down the Nile in specially designed boats. Kena is also recognized for the high-quality dates sold in its bazaars and for its large community of dancing girls. The town engages in trade of grain and dates with Arabia, through Kosseir on the Red Sea, which is 100 miles east in a straight line. This limited traffic is all that remains of the extensive trade that used to occur—mainly through Berenice and Coptos—between Upper Egypt and India and Arabia. The road to Kosseir is very old, passing through the Hammāmāt valley, known for its ancient breccia quarries and abandoned gold mines. During the British operations in Egypt in 1801, Sir David Baird and his troops traveled this route to Kena, taking sixteen days to journey from Kosseir.

KENDAL, DUKEDOM OF. The English title of duke of Kendal was first bestowed in May 1667 upon Charles (d. 1667), the infant son of the duke of York, afterwards James II. Several persons have been created earl of Kendal, among them being John, duke of Bedford, son of Henry IV.; John Beaufort, duke of Somerset (d. 1444); and Queen Anne’s husband, George, prince of Denmark.
Kendal, Dukedom of. The English title of Duke of Kendal was first given in May 1667 to Charles (d. 1667), the infant son of the Duke of York, who later became James II. Several people have been made Earl of Kendal, including John, Duke of Bedford, son of Henry IV; John Beaufort, Duke of Somerset (d. 1444); and Queen Anne’s husband, George, Prince of Denmark.
In 1719 Ehrengarde Melusina (1667-1743), mistress of the English king George I., was created duchess of Kendal. This lady was the daughter of Gustavus Adolphus, count of Schulenburg (d. 1691), and was born at Emden on the 25th of December 1667. Her father held important positions under the elector of Brandenburg; her brother Matthias John (1661-1747) won great fame as a soldier in Germany and was afterwards commander-in-chief of the army of the republic of Venice. Having entered the household of Sophia, electress of Hanover, Melusina attracted the notice of her son, the future king, whose mistress she became about 1690. When George crossed over to England in 1714, the “Schulenburgin,” as Sophia called her, followed him and soon supplanted her principal rival, Charlotte Sophia, Baroness von Kilmannsegge (c. 1673-1725), afterwards countess of Darlington, as his first favourite. In 1716 she was created duchess of Munster; then duchess of Kendal; and in 1723 the emperor Charles VI. made her a princess of the Empire. The duchess was very avaricious and obtained large sums of money by selling public offices and titles; she also sold patent rights, one of these being the privilege of supplying Ireland with a new copper coinage. This she sold to a Wolverhampton iron merchant named William Wood (1671-1730), who flooded the country with coins known as “Wood’s halfpence,” thus giving occasion for the publication of Swift’s famous Drapier’s Letters. In political matters she had much influence with the king, and she received £10,000 for procuring the recall of Bolingbroke from exile. After George’s death in 1727 she lived at Kendal House, Isleworth, Middlesex, until her death on the 10th of May 1743. The duchess was by no means a beautiful woman, and her thin figure caused the populace to refer to her as the “maypole.” By the king she had two daughters: Petronilla Melusina (c. 1693-1778), who was created countess of Walsingham in 1722, and who married the great earl of Chesterfield; and Margaret Gertrude, countess of Lippe (1703-1773).
In 1719, Ehrengarde Melusina (1667-1743), the mistress of King George I of England, was made the Duchess of Kendal. She was the daughter of Gustavus Adolphus, Count of Schulenburg (d. 1691), and was born in Emden on December 25, 1667. Her father held important positions under the Elector of Brandenburg; her brother, Matthias John (1661-1747), gained fame as a soldier in Germany and later became the commander-in-chief of the army of the Republic of Venice. After joining the household of Sophia, Electress of Hanover, Melusina caught the attention of her son, the future king, and became his mistress around 1690. When George came to England in 1714, the "Schulenburgin," as Sophia called her, followed him, quickly becoming his favorite, surpassing her main rival, Charlotte Sophia, Baroness von Kilmannsegge (c. 1673-1725), who later became Countess of Darlington. In 1716, she was made Duchess of Munster, then Duchess of Kendal, and in 1723, Emperor Charles VI made her a Princess of the Empire. The duchess was quite greedy and amassed large sums of money by selling public offices and titles; she also sold patent rights, including the privilege to provide Ireland with a new copper coinage. She sold this to a Wolverhampton iron merchant named William Wood (1671-1730), who flooded the country with coins known as "Wood's halfpence," leading to the publication of Swift’s famous Drapier’s Letters. In political matters, she had significant influence with the king and received £10,000 for securing the recall of Bolingbroke from exile. After George’s death in 1727, she lived at Kendal House, Isleworth, Middlesex, until her death on May 10, 1743. The duchess was not considered beautiful, and her slim figure led people to nickname her the "maypole." She had two daughters with the king: Petronilla Melusina (c. 1693-1778), who became Countess of Walsingham in 1722 and married the famous Earl of Chesterfield; and Margaret Gertrude, Countess of Lippe (1703-1773).

KENDAL, WILLIAM HUNTER (1843- ), English actor, whose family name was Grimston, was born in London on the 16th of December 1843, the son of a painter. He made his first stage appearance at Glasgow in 1862 as Louis XIV., in A Life’s Revenge, billed as “Mr Kendall.” After some experience at Birmingham and elsewhere, he joined the Haymarket company in London in 1866, acting everything from burlesque to Romeo. In 1869 he married Margaret (Madge) Shafto Robertson (b. 1849), sister of the dramatist, T. W. Robertson. As “Mr and Mrs Kendal” their professional careers then became inseparable. Mrs Kendal’s first stage appearance was as Marie, “a child,” in The Orphan of the Frozen Sea in 1854 in London. She soon showed such talent both as actress and singer that she secured numerous engagements, and by 1865 was playing Ophelia and Desdemona. She was Mary Meredith in Our American Cousin with Sothern, and Pauline to his Claud Melnotte. But her real triumphs were at the Haymarket in Shakespearian revivals and the old English comedies. While Mr Kendal played Orlando, Charles Surface, Jack Absolute and Young Marlowe, his wife made the combination perfect with her Rosalind, Lady Teazle, Lydia Languish and Kate Hardcastle; and she created Galatea in Gilbert’s Pygmalion and Galatea (1871). Short seasons followed at the Court theatre and at the Prince of Wales’s, at the latter of which they joined the Bancrofts in Diplomacy and other plays. Then in 1879 began a long association with Mr (afterwards Sir John) Hare as joint-managers of the St James’s theatre, some of their notable successes being in The Squire, Impulse, The Ironmaster and A Scrap of Paper. In 1888, however, the Hare and Kendal régime came to an end. From that time Mr and Mrs Kendal chiefly toured in the provinces and in America, with an occasional season at rare intervals in London.
KENDAL, WILLIAM HUNTER (1843- ), English actor, whose family name was Grimston, was born in London on December 16, 1843, to a painter. He made his first stage appearance in Glasgow in 1862 as Louis XIV. in A Life’s Revenge, billed as “Mr Kendall.” After gaining experience in Birmingham and other places, he joined the Haymarket company in London in 1866, performing everything from burlesque to Romeo. In 1869, he married Margaret (Madge) Shafto Robertson (b. 1849), sister of the playwright T. W. Robertson. As “Mr and Mrs Kendal,” their professional careers became inseparable. Mrs. Kendal's first stage appearance was as Marie, “a child,” in The Orphan of the Frozen Sea in London in 1854. She quickly displayed such talent as both an actress and a singer that she secured numerous engagements, and by 1865, she was performing Ophelia and Desdemona. She played Mary Meredith in Our American Cousin with Sothern and was Pauline to his Claud Melnotte. However, her real triumphs were at the Haymarket in Shakespearean revivals and classic English comedies. While Mr. Kendal took on roles like Orlando, Charles Surface, Jack Absolute, and Young Marlowe, his wife complemented him perfectly with her performances as Rosalind, Lady Teazle, Lydia Languish, and Kate Hardcastle; she also originated the role of Galatea in Gilbert’s Pygmalion and Galatea (1871). Short seasons followed at the Court Theatre and at the Prince of Wales’s, where they joined the Bancrofts in Diplomacy and other plays. Then in 1879, they began a long partnership with Mr. (later Sir John) Hare as joint-managers of the St James’s Theatre, achieving notable successes in The Squire, Impulse, The Ironmaster, and A Scrap of Paper. However, in 1888, the Hare and Kendal partnership came to an end. From that point on, Mr. and Mrs. Kendal primarily toured in the provinces and America, with occasional short seasons in London.

KENDAL, a market town and municipal borough in the Kendal parliamentary division of Westmorland, England, 251 m. N.N.W. from London on the Windermere branch of the London & North-Western railway. Pop. (1901), 14,183. The town, the full name of which is Kirkby-Kendal or Kirkby-in-Kendal, is the largest in the county. It is picturesquely placed on the river Kent, and is irregularly built. The white-walled houses with their blue-slated roofs, and the numerous trees, give it an attractive appearance. To the S.W. rises an abrupt limestone eminence, Scout Scar, which commands an extensive view towards Windermere and the southern mountains of the Lake District. The church of the Holy Trinity, the oldest part of which dates from about 1200, is a Gothic building with five aisles and a square tower. In it is the helmet of Major Robert Philipson, who rode into the church during service in search of one of Cromwell’s officers, Colonel Briggs, to do vengeance on him. This major was notorious as “Robin the Devil,” and his story is told in Scott’s Rokeby. Among the public buildings are the town hall, classic in style; the market house, and literary and scientific institution, with a museum containing a fossil collection from the limestone of the locality. Educational establishments include a free grammar school, in modern buildings, founded in 1525 and well endowed; a blue-coat school, science and art school, and green-coat Sunday school (1813). On an eminence east of the town are the ruins of Kendal castle, attributed to the first barons of Kendal. It was the birthplace of Catherine Parr, Henry VIII.’s last queen. On the Castlebrow Hill, an artificial mound probably of pre-Norman origin, an obelisk was raised in 1788 in memory of the revolution of 1688. The woollen manufactures of Kendal have been noted since 1331, when Edward III. is said to have granted letters of protection to John Kemp, a Flemish weaver who settled in the town; and, although the coarse cloth 728 known to Shakespeare as “Kendal green” is no longer made, its place is more than supplied by active manufactures of tweeds, railway rugs, horse clothing, knitted woollen caps and jackets, worsted and woollen yarns, and similar goods. Other manufactures of Kendal are machine-made boots and shoes, cards for wool and cotton, agricultural and other machinery, paper, and, in the neighbourhood, gunpowder. There is a large weekly market for grain, and annual horse and cattle fairs. The town is governed by a mayor, 6 aldermen and 18 councillors. Area, 2622 acres.
KENDAL, is a market town and municipal borough in the Kendal parliamentary division of Westmorland, England, located 251 m. N.N.W. from London on the Windermere branch of the London & North-Western railway. The population in 1901 was 14,183. The town, officially called Kirkby-Kendal or Kirkby-in-Kendal, is the largest in the county. It is beautifully situated on the river Kent, with an irregular layout. The white-walled houses topped with blue slate roofs and the many trees create a charming vibe. To the southwest rises a steep limestone hill, Scout Scar, which offers a wide view towards Windermere and the southern mountains of the Lake District. The church of the Holy Trinity, with its oldest parts dating back to around 1200, is a Gothic structure featuring five aisles and a square tower. Inside, there is the helmet of Major Robert Philipson, who famously rode into the church during a service looking for one of Cromwell’s officers, Colonel Briggs, to take revenge on him. This major was infamously known as “Robin the Devil,” and his tale is recounted in Scott’s Rokeby. Among the notable public buildings are the classic-style town hall, the market house, and a literary and scientific institution that includes a museum with a fossil collection from the local limestone. Educational institutions consist of a free grammar school in modern buildings, established in 1525 and well-funded; a blue-coat school, a science and art school, and a green-coat Sunday school (1813). East of the town are the ruins of Kendal castle, linked to the first barons of Kendal. It is the birthplace of Catherine Parr, the last queen of Henry VIII. On Castlebrow Hill, an artificial mound likely dating back to pre-Norman times, an obelisk was erected in 1788 to commemorate the revolution of 1688. Kendal has been noted for its woolen manufacturing since 1331 when Edward III reportedly granted protection to John Kemp, a Flemish weaver who settled in the town. Although the coarse cloth known to Shakespeare as “Kendal green” is no longer produced, it has been replaced by active manufacturing of tweeds, railway rugs, horse clothing, knitted wool caps and jackets, worsted and wool yarns, and other similar products. Other products manufactured in Kendal include machine-made boots and shoes, cards for wool and cotton, agricultural machinery, paper, and gunpowder in the surrounding area. There is a large weekly market for grain and annual horse and cattle fairs. The town is governed by a mayor, 6 aldermen, and 18 councillors. Area: 2,622 acres.
The outline of a Roman fort is traceable at Watercrook near Kendal. The barony and castle of Kendal or Kirkby-in-Kendal, held by Turold before the Conquest, were granted by William I. to Ivo de Taillebois, but the barony was divided into three parts in the reign of Richard II., one part with the castle passing to Sir William Parr, knight, ancestor of Catherine Parr. After the death of her brother William Parr, marquess of Northampton, his share of the barony called Marquis Fee reverted to Queen Elizabeth. The castle, being evidently deserted, was in ruins in 1586. Kendal was plundered by the Scots in 1210, and was visited by the rebels in 1715 and again in 1745 when the Pretender was proclaimed king there. Burgesses in Kendal are mentioned in 1345, and the borough with “court housez” and the fee-farm of free tenants is included in a confirmation charter to Sir William Parr in 1472. Richard III. in 1484 granted the inhabitants of the barony freedom from toll, passage and pontage, and the town was incorporated in 1576 by Queen Elizabeth under the title of an alderman and 12 burgesses, but Charles I. in 1635 appointed a mayor, 12 aldermen and 20 capital burgesses. Under the Municipal Reform Act of 1835 the corporation was again altered. From 1832 to 1885 Kendal sent one member to parliament, but since the last date its representation has been merged in that of the southern division of the county. A weekly market on Saturday granted by Richard I. to Roger Fitz Reinfred was purchased by the corporation from the earl of Lonsdale and Captain Bagot, lords of the manor, in 1885 and 1886. Of the five fairs which are now held three are ancient, that now held on the 29th of April being granted to Marmaduke de Tweng and William de Ros in 1307, and those on the 8th and 9th of November to Christiana, widow of Ingelram de Gynes, in 1333.
The outline of a Roman fort can be seen at Watercrook near Kendal. The barony and castle of Kendal or Kirkby-in-Kendal, which Turold held before the Conquest, were granted by William I to Ivo de Taillebois. However, during the reign of Richard II, the barony was split into three parts, with one part along with the castle going to Sir William Parr, knight, an ancestor of Catherine Parr. After her brother William Parr, marquess of Northampton, died, his portion of the barony known as Marquis Fee returned to Queen Elizabeth. By 1586, the castle was clearly abandoned and in ruins. Kendal was raided by the Scots in 1210 and was visited by rebels in 1715 and again in 1745 when the Pretender was proclaimed king there. Burgesses in Kendal were mentioned in 1345, and the borough, including “court houses” and the fee-farm of free tenants, was part of a confirmation charter to Sir William Parr in 1472. Richard III in 1484 granted the residents of the barony exemption from toll, passage, and bridge fees, and Queen Elizabeth incorporated the town in 1576 under the title of an alderman and 12 burgesses. However, Charles I appointed a mayor, 12 aldermen, and 20 capital burgesses in 1635. The corporation was restructured again under the Municipal Reform Act of 1835. From 1832 to 1885, Kendal sent one representative to Parliament, but since then its representation has been combined with that of the southern division of the county. A weekly Saturday market, which Richard I granted to Roger Fitz Reinfred, was purchased by the corporation from the Earl of Lonsdale and Captain Bagot, the lords of the manor, in 1885 and 1886. Of the five fairs currently held, three are historical—one on April 29, granted to Marmaduke de Tweng and William de Ros in 1307, and the others on November 8 and 9, granted to Christiana, widow of Ingelram de Gynes, in 1333.
See Victoria County History, Westmorland; Cornelius Nicholson, The Annals of Kendal (1861).
See Victoria County History, Westmorland; Cornelius Nicholson, The Annals of Kendal (1861).

KENDALL, HENRY CLARENCE (1841-1882), Australian poet, son of a missionary, was born in New South Wales on the 18th of April 1841. He received only a slight education, and in 1860 he entered a lawyer’s office in Sydney. He had always had literary tastes, and sent some of his verses in 1862 to London to be published in the Athenaeum. Next year he obtained a clerkship in the Lands Department at Sydney, being afterwards transferred to the Colonial Secretary’s office; and he combined this work with the writing of poetry and with journalism. His principal volumes of verse were Leaves from an Australian Forest (1869) and Songs from the Mountains (1880), his feeling for nature, as embodied in Australian landscape and bush-life, being very true and full of charm. In 1869 he resigned his post in the public service, and for some little while was in business with his brothers. Sir Henry Parkes took an interest in him, and eventually appointed him to an inspectorship of forests. He died on the 1st of August 1882. In 1886 a memorial edition of his poems was published at Melbourne.
KENDALL, HENRY CLARENCE (1841-1882), Australian poet, son of a missionary, was born in New South Wales on April 18, 1841. He had a limited education and entered a lawyer’s office in Sydney in 1860. He always had a passion for literature and sent some of his poems to London in 1862 to be published in the Athenaeum. The following year, he got a job as a clerk in the Lands Department in Sydney, later moving to the Colonial Secretary’s office; he balanced this job with writing poetry and journalism. His main poetry collections were Leaves from an Australian Forest (1869) and Songs from the Mountains (1880), showcasing his genuine and charming appreciation for nature, particularly in the context of Australian landscapes and bush life. In 1869, he left his government job and briefly went into business with his brothers. Sir Henry Parkes recognized his talent and eventually appointed him as an inspector of forests. He passed away on August 1, 1882. A memorial edition of his poems was published in Melbourne in 1886.

KENEALY, EDWARD VAUGHAN HYDE (1819-1880), Irish barrister and author, was born at Cork on the 2nd of July 1819, the son of a local merchant. He was educated at Trinity College, Dublin; was called to the Irish bar in 1840 and to the English bar in 1847; and obtained a fair practice in criminal cases. In 1868 he became a Q.C. and a bencher of Gray’s Inn. It was not, however, till 1873, when he became leading counsel for the Tichborne claimant, that he came into any great prominence. His violent conduct of the case became a public scandal, and after the verdict against his client he started a paper to plead his cause and to attack the judges. His behaviour was so extreme that in 1874 he was disbenched and disbarred by his Inn. He then started an agitation throughout the country to ventilate his grievances, and in 1875 was elected to parliament for Stoke; but no member would introduce him when he took his seat. Dr Kenealy, as he was always called, gradually ceased to attract attention, and on the 16th of April 1880 he died in London. He published a great quantity of verse, and also of somewhat mystical theology. His second daughter, Dr Arabella Kenealy, besides practising as a physician, wrote some clever novels.
Kenealy, Edward Vaughan Hyde (1819-1880), Irish barrister and author, was born in Cork on July 2, 1819, the son of a local merchant. He was educated at Trinity College, Dublin; called to the Irish bar in 1840 and the English bar in 1847; and built a decent practice in criminal cases. In 1868, he became a Queen's Counsel and a bencher of Gray’s Inn. However, it wasn't until 1873, when he became the leading counsel for the Tichborne claimant, that he gained significant attention. His aggressive handling of the case created a public scandal, and after the verdict against his client, he started a newspaper to support his case and criticize the judges. His actions were so extreme that in 1874 he was disbenched and disbarred by his Inn. He then initiated a campaign across the country to voice his complaints, and in 1875 was elected to parliament for Stoke; but no member would introduce him when he took his seat. Dr. Kenealy, as he was always known, gradually faded from the spotlight, and on April 16, 1880, he died in London. He published a large amount of poetry and some somewhat mystical theology. His second daughter, Dr. Arabella Kenealy, besides working as a physician, wrote some clever novels.

KĒNG TŪNG, the most extensive of the Shan States in the province of Burma. It is in the southern Shan States’ charge and lies almost entirely east of the Salween river. The area of the state is rather over 12,000 sq. m. It is bounded N. by the states of Mang Lön, Möng Lem and Kēng Hūng (Hsip Hsawng Pannā), the two latter under Chinese control; E. by the Mekong river, on the farther side of which is French Lao territory; S. by the Siamese Shan States, and W. in a general way by the Salween river, though it overlaps it in some places. The state is known to the Chinese as Mêng Kêng, and was frequently called by the Burmese “the 32 cities of the Gôn” (Hkön). Kēng Tūng has expanded very considerably since the establishment of British control, by the inclusion of the districts of Hsen Yawt, Hsen Mawng, Möng Hsat, Möng Pu, and the cis-Mekong portions of Kēng Cheng, which in Burmese times were separate charges. The “classical” name of the state is Khemarata or Khemarata Tungkapuri. About 63% of the area lies in the basin of the Mekong river and 37% in the Salween drainage area. The watershed is a high and generally continuous range. Some of its peaks rise to over 7000 ft., and the elevation is nowhere much below 5000 ft. Parallel to this successive hill ranges run north and south. Mountainous country so greatly predominates that the scattered valleys are but as islands in a sea of rugged hills. The chief rivers, tributaries of the Salween, are the Nam Hka, the Hwe Lông, Nam Pu, and the Nam Hsīm. The first and last are very considerable rivers. The Nam Hka rises in the Wa or Vü states, the Nam Hsīm on the watershed range in the centre of the state. Rocks and rapids make both unnavigable, but much timber goes down the Nam Hsīm. The lower part of both rivers forms the boundary of Kēng Tūng state. The chief tributaries of the Mekong are the Nam Nga, the Nam Lwe, the Nam Yawng, Nam Līn, Nam Hôk and Nam Kôk. Of these the chief is the Nam Lwe, which is navigable in the interior of the state, but enters the Mekong by a gorge broken up by rocks. The Nam Līn and the Nam Kôk are also considerable streams. The lower course of the latter passes by Chieng Rai in Siamese territory. The lower Nam Hôk or Mē Huak forms the boundary with Siam.
KĒNG TŪNG, is the largest of the Shan States in Burma. It's managed by the southern Shan States and lies mostly to the east of the Salween River. The state's area is just over 12,000 square miles. It's bordered to the north by the states of Mang Lön, Möng Lem, and Kēng Hūng (Hsip Hsawng Pannā), with the latter two under Chinese control; to the east by the Mekong River, beyond which is French Lao territory; to the south by the Siamese Shan States; and to the west generally by the Salween River, although it overlaps in some areas. The Chinese know this state as Mêng Kêng, and the Burmese often referred to it as “the 32 cities of the Gôn” (Hkön). Kēng Tūng has significantly grown since British control was established, incorporating the districts of Hsen Yawt, Hsen Mawng, Möng Hsat, Möng Pu, and the cis-Mekong portions of Kēng Cheng, which were separate during Burmese times. The "classical" name of the state is Khemarata or Khemarata Tungkapuri. About 63% of the area is in the Mekong River basin, and 37% is in the Salween drainage area. The watershed is a high and generally continuous mountain range, with some peaks rising over 7,000 feet, and the elevation rarely drops below 5,000 feet. Successive hill ranges run parallel to this, going north and south. The mountainous terrain is so dominant that the scattered valleys are like islands in a sea of rugged hills. The main rivers, tributaries of the Salween, are the Nam Hka, the Hwe Lông, Nam Pu, and the Nam Hsīm. The first and last are significant rivers. The Nam Hka begins in the Wa or Vü states, and the Nam Hsīm starts on the watershed range in the state’s center. Rocks and rapids make both rivers unnavigable, though a lot of timber flows down the Nam Hsīm. The lower parts of both rivers mark the boundary of Kēng Tūng state. The main tributaries of the Mekong are the Nam Nga, the Nam Lwe, the Nam Yawng, Nam Līn, Nam Hôk, and Nam Kôk. Among these, the Nam Lwe is the most important, navigable in the state's interior, but it enters the Mekong through a rocky gorge. The Nam Līn and the Nam Kôk are also significant streams. The lower part of the latter flows past Chieng Rai in Thai territory. The lower Nam Hôk, or Mē Huak, forms the boundary with Siam.
The existence of minerals was reported by the sawbwa, or chief, to Francis Garnier in 1867, but none is worked or located. Gold is washed in most of the streams. Teak forests exist in Möng Pu and Möng Hsat, and the sawbwa works them as government contracts. One-third of the price realized from the sale of the logs at Moulmein is retained as the government royalty. There are teak forests also in the Mekong drainage area in the south of the state, but there is only a local market for the timber. Rice, as elsewhere in the Shan States, is the chief crop. Next to it is sugar-cane, grown both as a field crop and in gardens. Earth-nuts and tobacco are the only other field crops in the valleys. On the hills, besides rice, cotton, poppy and tea are the chief crops. The tea is carelessly grown, badly prepared, and only consumed locally. A great deal of garden produce is raised in the valleys, especially near the capital. The state is rich in cattle, and exports them to the country west of the Salween. Cotton and opium are exported in large quantities, the former entirely to China, a good deal of the latter to northern Siam, which also takes shoes and sandals. Tea is carried through westwards from Kēng Hūng, and silk from the Siamese Shan States. Cotton and silk weaving are dying out as industries. Large quantities of shoes and sandals are made of buffalo and bullock hide, with Chinese felt uppers and soft iron hobnails. There is a good deal of pottery work. The chief work in iron is the manufacture of guns, which has been carried on for many years in certain villages of the Sam Tao district. The gun barrels and springs are rude but effective, though not very durable. The revenue of the state is collected as the Burmese thathameda, a rude system of income-tax. From 1890, when the state made its submission, the annual tributary offerings made in Burmese times were continued to the British government, but in 1894 these offerings were converted into tribute. For the quinquennial period 1903-1908 the state paid Rs. 30,000 (£2000) annually.
The sawbwa, or chief, informed Francis Garnier in 1867 about the presence of minerals, but none are being mined or found. Gold is panned from most of the streams. There are teak forests in Möng Pu and Möng Hsat, which the sawbwa manages through government contracts. One-third of the revenue generated from selling the logs in Moulmein is kept as government royalty. There are also teak forests in the Mekong drainage area in the southern part of the state, but there's only a local market for the timber. Rice is the main crop, just like in other parts of the Shan States. Sugarcane follows, grown both in fields and gardens. The only other field crops in the valleys are peanuts and tobacco. In the hills, alongside rice, the main crops are cotton, poppy, and tea. The tea is grown carelessly, poorly processed, and only consumed locally. A significant amount of garden produce is cultivated in the valleys, particularly near the capital. The state is rich in cattle and exports them to the region west of the Salween. Large quantities of cotton and opium are exported, with cotton entirely shipped to China and a considerable portion of opium sent to northern Siam, which also imports shoes and sandals. Tea is transported westward from Kēng Hūng, along with silk from the Siamese Shan States. Cotton and silk weaving are declining as industries. A lot of shoes and sandals are made from buffalo and bullock hide, paired with Chinese felt uppers and soft iron hobnails. There’s a fair amount of pottery work being done. The main ironwork focuses on manufacturing guns, which has taken place for many years in certain villages of the Sam Tao district. The gun barrels and springs are primitive but functional, though not very durable. The state’s revenue is collected as the Burmese thathameda, a basic income tax system. Starting in 1890, when the state submitted, the annual tributary offerings from Burmese times continued to the British government, but in 1894 these offerings were changed into tribute. For the five-year period 1903-1908, the state paid Rs. 30,000 (£2000) each year.
The population of the state was enumerated for the first time in 1901, giving a total of 190,698. According to an estimate made by Mr G. C. Stirling, the political officer in charge of the state, in 1897-1898, of the various tribes of Shans, the Hkün and Lü contribute about 36,000 each, the western Shans 32,000, the Lem and Lao Shans about 7000, and the Chinese Shans about 5000. Of the hill tribes, the Kaw or Aka are the most homogeneous with 22,000, but probably the Wa (or Vü), disguised under various tribal names, are at least equally numerous. Nominal Buddhists make up a total of 133,400, and the remainder are classed as animists. Spirit-worship is, however, very conspicuously prevalent amongst all classes even of the Shans. The present sawbwa or chief received his patent from the British government on the 9th of February 1897. The early history of Kēng Tūng is very obscure, but Burmese influence seems to have been maintained since the latter half, at any rate, of the 16th century. The Chinese made several attempts to subdue the state, and appear to have taken the capital in 1765-66, but were driven out by the united Shan and Burmese troops. The same fate seems to have attended the first Siamese invasion of 1804. The second and third Siamese invasions, in 1852 and 1854, resulted in great disaster to the invaders, though the capital was invested for a time.
The state’s population was counted for the first time in 1901, totaling 190,698. An estimate by Mr. G. C. Stirling, the political officer overseeing the state in 1897-1898, indicated that among the various Shan tribes, the Hkün and Lü each contributed about 36,000, the western Shans around 32,000, the Lem and Lao Shans approximately 7,000, and the Chinese Shans about 5,000. Among the hill tribes, the Kaw or Aka are the most cohesive with 22,000, but likely the Wa (or Vü), disguised under various tribal names, are at least equally numerous. Nominal Buddhists total 133,400, while the rest are classified as animists. However, spirit-worship is very visibly practiced among all classes of the Shans. The current sawbwa or chief received his authority from the British government on February 9, 1897. The early history of Kēng Tūng is quite unclear, but Burmese influence seems to have been maintained since at least the latter half of the 16th century. The Chinese attempted several times to conquer the state and reportedly captured the capital in 1765-66, but were expelled by the united Shan and Burmese forces. The same outcome seems to have affected the first Siamese invasion in 1804. The second and third Siamese invasions, in 1852 and 1854, ended in great disaster for the invaders, although the capital was besieged for a time.
Kēng Tūng, the capital, is situated towards the southern end of a valley about 12 m. long and with an average breadth of 7 m. The town is surrounded by a brick wall and moat about 5 m. round. Only the central and northern portions are much built over. Pop. (1901), 5695. It is the most considerable town in the British Shan States. In the dry season crowds attend the market held according to Shan custom every five days, and numerous caravans come from China. The military post formerly was 7 m. west of the town, at the foot of the watershed range. At first the headquarters of a regiment was stationed there; this was reduced to a wing, and recently to military police. The site was badly chosen and proved very unhealthy, and the headquarters both military and civil have been transferred to Loi Ngwe Lông, a ridge 6500 ft. above sea-level 12 m. south of the capital. The rainfall probably averages between 50 and 60 in. for the year. The temperature seems to rise to nearly 100° F. during the hot weather, falling 30° or more during the night. In the cold weather a temperature of 40° or a few degrees more or less appears to be the lowest experienced. The plain in which the capital stands has an altitude of 3000 ft.
Kēng Tūng, the capital, is located at the southern end of a valley about 12 km long and 7 km wide on average. The town is encircled by a brick wall and a moat approximately 5 km around. Only the central and northern parts have significant development. Population (1901): 5,695. It is the most important town in the British Shan States. During the dry season, crowds gather for the market, which takes place every five days according to Shan tradition, and many caravans arrive from China. The military post used to be 7 km west of the town, at the base of the watershed range. Initially, the headquarters of a regiment was stationed there, but this was reduced to just a wing, and recently it has been downgraded to military police. The location was poorly chosen and turned out to be very unhealthy, leading to the transfer of both military and civil headquarters to Loi Ngwe Lông, a ridge 6,500 ft. above sea level, 12 km south of the capital. The annual rainfall likely averages between 50 and 60 inches. The temperature can reach nearly 100°F during hot weather, dropping by 30° or more at night. In the cold weather, the lowest temperature recorded is around 40° or a few degrees more or less. The plain where the capital is located sits at an altitude of 3,000 ft.

KENILWORTH, a market town in the Rugby parliamentary division of Warwickshire, England; pleasantly situated on a tributary of the Avon, on a branch of the London & North-Western railway, 99 m. N.W. from London. Pop. of urban district (1901), 4544. The town is only of importance from its antiquarian interest and the magnificent ruins of its old castle. The walls originally enclosed an area of 7 acres. The principal portions of the building remaining are the gatehouse, now used as a dwelling-house; Caesar’s tower, the only portion built by Geoffrey de Clinton now extant, with massive walls 16 ft. thick; the Merwyn’s tower of Scott’s Kenilworth; the great hall built by John of Gaunt with windows of very beautiful design; and the Leicester buildings, which are in a very ruinous condition. Not far from the castle are the remains of an Augustinian monastery founded in 1122, and afterwards made an abbey. Adjoining the abbey is the parish church of St Nicholas, restored in 1865, a structure of mixed architecture, containing a fine Norman doorway, which is supposed to have been the entrance of the former abbey church.
KENILWORTH, is a market town in the Rugby parliamentary division of Warwickshire, England; it’s nicely located on a tributary of the Avon, on a branch of the London & North-Western railway, 99 miles northwest of London. The population of the urban district (1901) was 4,544. The town is mainly significant for its historical interest and the impressive ruins of its old castle. The walls once surrounded an area of 7 acres. The main structures still standing include the gatehouse, which is now a home; Caesar’s tower, the only part built by Geoffrey de Clinton that still exists, with thick walls of 16 feet; the Merwyn’s tower from Scott’s Kenilworth; the great hall constructed by John of Gaunt featuring beautifully designed windows; and the Leicester buildings, which are in very poor condition. Close to the castle are the remnants of an Augustinian monastery established in 1122, which was later turned into an abbey. Next to the abbey is the parish church of St Nicholas, restored in 1865, a mixed-architecture structure that includes a fine Norman doorway, believed to have been the entrance to the former abbey church.
Kenilworth (Chinewrde, Kenillewurda, Kinelingworthe, Kenilord, Killingworth) is said to have been a member of Stoneleigh before the Norman Conquest and a possession of the Saxon kings, whose royal residence there was destroyed in the wars between Edward and Canute. The town was granted by Henry I. to Geoffrey de Clinton, a Norman who built the castle round which the whole history of Kenilworth centres. He also founded a monastery here about 1122. Geoffrey’s grandson released his right to King John, and the castle remained with the crown until Henry III. granted it to Simon de Montfort, earl of Leicester. The famous “Dictum de Kenilworth” was proclaimed here in 1266. After the battle of Evesham the rebel forces rallied at the castle, which, after a siege of six months, was surrendered by Henry de Hastings, the governor, on account of the scarceness of food and of the “pestilent disease” which raged there. The king then granted it to his son Edmund. Through John of Gaunt it came to Henry IV. and was granted by Elizabeth in 1562 to Robert Dudley, afterwards earl of Leicester, but on his death in 1588 again merged in the possessions of the Crown. The earl spent large sums on restoring the castle and grounds, and here in July 1575 he entertained Queen Elizabeth at “excessive cost,” as described in Scott’s Kenilworth. On the queen’s first entry “a small floating island illuminated by a great variety of torches ... made its appearance upon the lake,” upon which, clad in silks, were the Lady of the Lake and two nymphs waiting on her, and for the several days of her stay “rare shews and sports were there exercised.” During the civil wars the castle was dismantled by the soldiers of Cromwell and was from that time abandoned to decay. The only mention of Kenilworth as a borough occurs in a charter of Henry I. to Geoffrey de Clinton and in the charters of Henry I. and Henry II. to the church of St Mary of Kenilworth confirming the grant of lands made by Geoffrey to this church, and mentioning that he kept the land in which his castle was situated and also land for making his borough, park and fishpond. The town possesses large tanneries.
Kenilworth (Chinewrde, Kenillewurda, Kinelingworthe, Kenilord, Killingworth) is said to have been part of Stoneleigh before the Norman Conquest and a possession of the Saxon kings, whose royal residence there was destroyed in the conflicts between Edward and Canute. The town was given by Henry I to Geoffrey de Clinton, a Norman who built the castle that is the focal point of Kenilworth's history. He also established a monastery here around 1122. Geoffrey’s grandson handed over his rights to King John, and the castle stayed with the crown until Henry III granted it to Simon de Montfort, the earl of Leicester. The famous “Dictum de Kenilworth” was announced here in 1266. After the battle of Evesham, the rebel forces regrouped at the castle, which, after a six-month siege, was surrendered by Henry de Hastings, the governor, due to the lack of food and the “pestilent disease” that was spreading there. The king then granted it to his son Edmund. Through John of Gaunt, it passed to Henry IV and was granted by Elizabeth in 1562 to Robert Dudley, who later became the earl of Leicester, but following his death in 1588, it again became a part of the Crown's possessions. The earl invested a lot of money in restoring the castle and its grounds, and in July 1575, he hosted Queen Elizabeth at “excessive cost,” as depicted in Scott’s Kenilworth. When the queen first arrived, “a small floating island illuminated by a great variety of torches ... appeared upon the lake,” where the Lady of the Lake and two nymphs, dressed in silks, awaited her. For her several days of stay, “rare shows and sports were held” there. During the civil wars, Cromwell’s soldiers dismantled the castle, and from then on, it was left to deteriorate. The only reference to Kenilworth as a borough appears in a charter of Henry I to Geoffrey de Clinton and in the charters of Henry I and Henry II to the church of St Mary of Kenilworth, confirming the land grants made by Geoffrey to this church, and noting that he retained the land where his castle was located, as well as land for creating his borough, park, and fishpond. The town has large tanneries.

KENITES, in the Bible a tribe or clan of the south of Palestine, closely associated with the Amalekites, whose hostility towards Israel, however, it did not share. On this account Saul spared them when bidden by Yahweh to destroy Amalek; David, too, whilst living in Judah, appears to have been on friendly terms with them (1 Sam. xv. 6; xxx. 29). Moses himself married into a Kenite family (Judges i. 16), and the variant tradition would seem to show that the Kenites were only a branch of the Midianites (see Jethro, Midian). Jael, the slayer of Sisera (see Deborah), was the wife of Heber the Kenite, who lived near Kadesh in Naphtali; and the appearance of the clan in this locality may be explained from the nomadic habits of the tribe, or else as a result of the northward movement in which at least one other clan or tribe took part (see Dan). There is an obscure allusion to their destruction in an appendage to the oracles of Balaam (Num. xxiv. 21 seq., see G. B. Gray, Intern. Crit. Comm. p. 376); and with this, the only unfavourable reference to them, may perhaps be associated the curse of Cain. Although some connexion with the name of Cain is probable, it is difficult, however, to explain the curse (for one view, see Levites). More important is the prominent part played by the Kenite (or Midianite) father-in-law of Moses, whose help and counsel are related in Exod. xviii.; and if, as seems probable, the Rechabites (q.v.) were likewise of Kenite origin (1 Chron. ii. 55), this obscure tribe had evidently an important part in shaping the religion of Israel.
KENITES, in the Bible, a tribe or clan from the southern region of Palestine, had a close relationship with the Amalekites, but unlike them, they did not show hostility towards Israel. Because of this, Saul spared them when commanded by Yahweh to wipe out Amalek; David also seemed to get along well with them while living in Judah (1 Sam. xv. 6; xxx. 29). Moses himself married into a Kenite family (Judges i. 16), and a different tradition suggests that the Kenites were just a branch of the Midianites (see Jethro, Midian). Jael, who killed Sisera (see Deborah), was married to Heber the Kenite, who lived near Kadesh in Naphtali. Their presence in this area could be explained by their nomadic lifestyle or possibly due to a migration involving at least one other clan or tribe (see Dan). There is a vague reference to their destruction in an addition to Balaam’s oracles (Num. xxiv. 21 seq., see G. B. Gray, Intern. Crit. Comm. p. 376); this, along with the only negative mention of them, could be connected to the curse of Cain. Although there’s likely a link between their name and Cain, the curse is challenging to interpret (for one perspective, see Levites). More significantly, the Kenite (or Midianite) father-in-law of Moses played an important role, as detailed in Exod. xviii.; if, as seems likely, the Rechabites (q.v.) also came from Kenite roots (1 Chron. ii. 55), this lesser-known tribe clearly had a significant influence on the religion of Israel.
See on this question, Hebrew Religion, and Budde, Religion of Israel to the Exile, vol. i.; G. A. Barton, Semitic Origins, pp. 272 sqq.; L. B. Paton, Biblical World (1906, July and August). On the migration of the Kenites into Palestine (cf. Num. x. 29 with Judges i. 16), see Caleb, Genesis, Jerahmeel, Judah.
See on this question, Hebrew Religion, and Budde, Religion of Israel to the Exile, vol. i.; G. A. Barton, Semitic Origins, pp. 272 sqq.; L. B. Paton, Biblical World (1906, July and August). For the migration of the Kenites into Palestine (compare Num. x. 29 with Judges i. 16), see Caleb, Genesis, Jerahmeel, Judah.

KENMORE, a village and parish of Perthshire, Scotland, 6 m. W. of Aberfeldy. Pop. of parish (1901), 1271. It is situated at the foot of Loch Tay, near the point where the river Tay leaves the lake. Taymouth Castle, the seat of the Marquess of Breadalbane, stands near the base of Drummond Hill in a princely park through which flows the Tay. It is a stately four-storeyed edifice with corner towers and a central pavilion, and was built in 1801 (the west wing being added in 1842) on the site of the mansion erected in 1580 for Sir Colin Campbell of Glenorchy. The old house was called Balloch (Gaelic, bealach, “the outlet of a lake”). Two miles S.W. of Kenmore are the Falls of the Acharn, 80 ft. high. When Wordsworth and his sister visited them in 1803 the grotto at the cascade was fitted up to represent a “hermit’s mossy cell.” At the village of Fortingall, on the north side of Loch Tay, are the shell of a yew conjectured to be 3000 years old and the remains of a Roman camp. Glenlyon House was the home of Campbell of Glenlyon, chief agent in the massacre of Glencoe. At Garth, 2½ m. N.E., are the ruins of an ancient castle, said to have been a stronghold of Alexander Stewart, the Wolf of Badenoch (1343-1405), in close proximity to the modern mansion built for Sir Donald Currie.
KENMORE, is a village and parish in Perthshire, Scotland, located 6 miles west of Aberfeldy. The parish population in 1901 was 1,271. It sits at the foot of Loch Tay, near where the River Tay flows out of the lake. Taymouth Castle, the residence of the Marquess of Breadalbane, is situated near the base of Drummond Hill in an impressive park through which the Tay River flows. The castle is a grand four-story building with corner towers and a central pavilion, constructed in 1801 (with the west wing added in 1842) on the site of a mansion built in 1580 for Sir Colin Campbell of Glenorchy. The old house was known as Balloch (Gaelic, bealach, meaning “the outlet of a lake”). Two miles southwest of Kenmore are the Falls of Acharn, which are 80 feet high. When Wordsworth and his sister visited in 1803, the grotto by the waterfall was arranged to look like a “hermit’s mossy cell.” In the village of Fortingall, on the north side of Loch Tay, there is a yew tree believed to be around 3,000 years old and the remnants of a Roman camp. Glenlyon House was the home of Campbell of Glenlyon, who played a key role in the massacre of Glencoe. Near Garth, 2½ miles northeast, are the ruins of an ancient castle, thought to have been a stronghold of Alexander Stewart, the Wolf of Badenoch (1343-1405), located close to the modern house built for Sir Donald Currie.

KENMURE, WILLIAM GORDON, 6th viscount (d. 1716), Jacobite leader, son of Alexander, 5th viscount (d. 1698), was descended from the same family as Sir John Gordon of Lochinvar (d. 1604), whose grandson, Sir John Gordon (d. 1634), was 730 created Viscount Kenmure in 1633. The family had generally adhered to the Presbyterian cause, but Robert, the 4th viscount, had been excepted from the amnesty granted to the Scottish royalists in 1654, and the 5th viscount, who had succeeded his kinsman Robert in 1663, after some vacillation, had joined the court of the exiled Stuarts. The 6th viscount’s adherence to the Pretender in 1715 is said to have been due to his wife Mary Dalzell (d. 1776), sister of Robert, 6th earl of Carnwath. He raised the royal standard of Scotland at Lochmaben on the 12th of October 1715, and was joined by about two hundred gentlemen, with Carnwath, William Maxwell, 5th earl of Nithsdale, and George Seton, 5th earl of Wintoun. This small force received some additions before Kenmure reached Hawick, where he learnt the news of the English rising. He effected a junction with Thomas Forster and James Radclyffe, 3rd earl of Derwentwater, at Rothbury. Their united forces of some fourteen hundred men, after a series of rather aimless marches, halted at Kelso, where they were reinforced by a brigade under William Mackintosh. Threatened by an English army under General George Carpenter, they eventually crossed the English border to join the Lancashire Jacobites, and the command was taken over by Forster. Kenmure was taken prisoner at Preston on the 13th of November, and was sent to the Tower. In the following January he was tried with other Jacobite noblemen before the House of Lords, when he pleaded guilty, and appealed to the king’s mercy. Immediately before his execution on Tower Hill on the 24th of February he reiterated his belief in the claims of the Pretender. His estates and titles were forfeited, but in 1824 an act of parliament repealed the forfeiture, and his direct descendant, John Gordon (1750-1840), became Viscount Kenmure. On the death of the succeeding peer, Adam, 8th viscount, without issue in 1847, the title became dormant.
KENMURE, WILLIAM GORDON, 6th viscount (d. 1716), Jacobite leader, was the son of Alexander, 5th viscount (d. 1698), and came from the same lineage as Sir John Gordon of Lochinvar (d. 1604), whose grandson, Sir John Gordon (d. 1634), was made Viscount Kenmure in 1633. The family typically supported the Presbyterian cause, but Robert, the 4th viscount, had been excluded from the amnesty offered to Scottish royalists in 1654. The 5th viscount, who took over from his relative Robert in 1663, had initially hesitated but eventually aligned with the court of the exiled Stuarts. The 6th viscount's support for the Pretender in 1715 is said to stem from his wife Mary Dalzell (d. 1776), sister of Robert, 6th earl of Carnwath. He raised the royal standard of Scotland at Lochmaben on October 12, 1715, and was joined by about two hundred gentlemen, including Carnwath, William Maxwell, 5th earl of Nithsdale, and George Seton, 5th earl of Wintoun. This small force gained some reinforcements before Kenmure reached Hawick, where he received news of the English rising. He joined forces with Thomas Forster and James Radclyffe, 3rd earl of Derwentwater, at Rothbury. Their combined forces of about fourteen hundred men, after several somewhat aimless marches, paused at Kelso, where they were bolstered by a brigade led by William Mackintosh. Facing an English army under General George Carpenter, they eventually crossed the English border to unite with the Lancashire Jacobites, with Forster taking command. Kenmure was captured at Preston on November 13 and was taken to the Tower. The following January, he was tried alongside other Jacobite noblemen before the House of Lords, where he pleaded guilty and appealed for the king's mercy. Just before his execution on Tower Hill on February 24, he reaffirmed his belief in the claims of the Pretender. His estates and titles were forfeited, but in 1824, an act of parliament reversed the forfeiture, allowing his direct descendant, John Gordon (1750-1840), to become Viscount Kenmure. When the next peer, Adam, 8th viscount, died without heirs in 1847, the title became dormant.

A certain Duncan who became earl of Carrick early in the 13th century is possibly an ancestor of the Kennedys, but a more certain ancestor is John Kennedy of Dunure, who obtained Cassillis and other lands in Ayrshire about 1350. John’s descendant, Sir James Kennedy, married Mary, a daughter of King Robert III. and their son, Sir Gilbert Kennedy, was created Lord Kennedy before 1458. Another son was James Kennedy (c. 1406-1465), bishop of St Andrews from 1441 until his death in July 1465. The bishop founded and endowed St Salvator’s college at St Andrews and built a large and famous ship called the “St Salvator.” Andrew Lang (History of Scotland, vol. i.) says of him, “The chapel which he built for his college is still thronged by the scarlet gowns of his students; his arms endure on the oaken doors; the beautiful silver mace of his gift, wrought in Paris, and representing all orders of spirits in the universe, is one of the few remaining relics of ancient Scottish plate.” Before the bishop had begun to assist in ruling Scotland, a kinsman, Sir Hugh Kennedy, had helped Joan of Arc to drive the English from France.
A certain Duncan, who became the Earl of Carrick in the early 13th century, is possibly an ancestor of the Kennedys. However, a more definite ancestor is John Kennedy of Dunure, who acquired Cassillis and other lands in Ayrshire around 1350. John’s descendant, Sir James Kennedy, married Mary, a daughter of King Robert III, and their son, Sir Gilbert Kennedy, was made Lord Kennedy before 1458. Another son, James Kennedy (circa 1406-1465), served as the bishop of St Andrews from 1441 until his death in July 1465. The bishop established and funded St Salvator’s College at St Andrews and built a large, renowned ship named the “St Salvator.” Andrew Lang (History of Scotland, vol. i.) notes about him, “The chapel he built for his college is still filled with the scarlet gowns of his students; his arms are still on the oaken doors; the beautiful silver mace he gifted, crafted in Paris and representing all orders of spirits in the universe, is one of the few remaining relics of ancient Scottish silver.” Before the bishop began to help govern Scotland, a relative, Sir Hugh Kennedy, assisted Joan of Arc in driving the English from France.
One of Gilbert Kennedy’s sons was the poet, Walter Kennedy (q.v.), and his grandson David, third Lord Kennedy (killed at Flodden, 1513), was created earl of Cassillis before 1510; David’s sister Janet Kennedy was one of the mistresses of James IV. The earl was succeeded by his son Gilbert, a prominent figure in the history of Scotland from 1513 until he was killed at Prestwick on the 22nd of December 1527. His son Gilbert, the 3rd earl (c. 1517-1558), was educated by George Buchanan, and was a prisoner in England after the rout of Solway Moss in 1542. He was soon released and was lord high treasurer of Scotland from 1554 to 1558, although he had been intriguing with the English and had offered to kill Cardinal Beaton in the interests of Henry VIII. He died somewhat mysteriously at Dieppe late in 1558 when returning from Paris, where he had attended the marriage of Mary Queen of Scots, and the dauphin of France. He was the father of the “king of Carrick” and the brother of Quintin Kennedy (1520-1564), abbot of Crossraguel. The abbot wrote several works defending the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church, and in 1562 had a public discussion on these questions with John Knox, which took place at Maybole and lasted for three days. He died on the 22nd of August 1564.
One of Gilbert Kennedy’s sons was the poet Walter Kennedy (q.v.), and his grandson David, the third Lord Kennedy (killed at Flodden, 1513), was made the Earl of Cassillis before 1510; David’s sister, Janet Kennedy, was one of James IV's mistresses. The earl was succeeded by his son Gilbert, who was a significant figure in Scottish history from 1513 until he was killed at Prestwick on December 22, 1527. His son Gilbert, the 3rd earl (c. 1517-1558), was educated by George Buchanan and was a prisoner in England after the defeat at Solway Moss in 1542. He was soon released and served as the Lord High Treasurer of Scotland from 1554 to 1558, although he had been plotting with the English and had offered to assassinate Cardinal Beaton for Henry VIII's sake. He died somewhat mysteriously in Dieppe in late 1558 while returning from Paris, where he had attended the wedding of Mary Queen of Scots and the dauphin of France. He was the father of the "king of Carrick" and the brother of Quintin Kennedy (1520-1564), abbot of Crossraguel. The abbot wrote several works defending the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church, and in 1562, he had a public debate on these issues with John Knox, which took place in Maybole and lasted for three days. He died on August 22, 1564.
Gilbert Kennedy, 4th earl of Cassillis (c. 1541-1576), called the “king of Carrick,” became a protestant, but fought for Queen Mary at Langside in 1568. He is better known through his cruel treatment of Allan Stewart, the commendator abbot of Crossraguel, Stewart being badly burned by the earl’s orders at Dunure in 1570 in order to compel him to renounce his title to the abbey lands which had been seized by Cassillis. This “ane werry greedy man” died at Edinburgh in December 1576. His son John (c. 1567-1615), who became the 5th earl, was lord high treasurer of Scotland in 1599 and his lifetime witnessed the culmination of a great feud between the senior and a younger branch of the Kennedy family. He was succeeded as 6th earl by his nephew John (c. 1595-1668), called “the grave and solemn earl.” A strong presbyterian, John was one of the leaders of the Scots in their resistance to Charles I. In 1643 he went to the Westminster Assembly of Divines and several times he was sent on missions to Charles I. and to Charles II.; for a time he was lord justice general and he was a member of Cromwell’s House of Lords. His son, John, became the 7th earl, and one of his daughters, Margaret, married Gilbert Burnet, afterwards bishop of Salisbury. His first wife, Jean (1607-1642), daughter of Thomas Hamilton, 1st earl of Haddington, has been regarded as the heroine of the ballad “The Gypsie Laddie,” but this identity is now completely disproved. John, the 7th earl, “the heir,” says Burnet, “to his father’s stiffness, but not to his other virtues,” supported the revolution of 1688 and died on the 23rd of July 1701; his grandson John, the 8th earl, died without sons in August 1759.
Gilbert Kennedy, 4th Earl of Cassillis (c. 1541-1576), known as the “king of Carrick,” became a Protestant but fought for Queen Mary at Langside in 1568. He is better remembered for his brutal treatment of Allan Stewart, the commendator abbot of Crossraguel, who was severely burned by the earl’s orders at Dunure in 1570 in an attempt to force him to give up his claim to the abbey lands that Cassillis had taken. This “very greedy man” died in Edinburgh in December 1576. His son John (c. 1567-1615), who became the 5th earl, served as Lord High Treasurer of Scotland in 1599, during which time a significant feud erupted between the senior and a younger branch of the Kennedy family. He was succeeded as 6th earl by his nephew John (c. 1595-1668), known as “the grave and solemn earl.” A staunch Presbyterian, John was a leader among the Scots resisting Charles I. In 1643, he attended the Westminster Assembly of Divines and frequently went on missions to Charles I and Charles II; he briefly served as Lord Justice General and was a member of Cromwell’s House of Lords. His son, John, became the 7th earl, and one of his daughters, Margaret, married Gilbert Burnet, who later became the bishop of Salisbury. His first wife, Jean (1607-1642), the daughter of Thomas Hamilton, 1st Earl of Haddington, was once thought to be the heroine of the ballad “The Gypsie Laddie,” but this has now been definitively disproven. John, the 7th earl, “the heir,” Burnet noted, “to his father’s stubbornness, but not to his other virtues,” supported the revolution of 1688 and died on July 23, 1701; his grandson John, the 8th earl, died without sons in August 1759.
The titles and estates of the Kennedys were now claimed by William Douglas, afterwards duke of Queensberry, a great-grandson in the female line of the 7th earl and also by Sir Thomas Kennedy, Bart., of Culzean, a descendant of the 3rd earl, i.e. by the heir general and the heir male. In January 1762 the House of Lords decided in favour of the heir male, and Sir Thomas became the 9th earl of Cassillis. He died unmarried on the 30th of November 1775, and his brother David, the 10th earl, also died unmarried on the 18th of December 1792, when the baronetcy became extinct. The earldom of Cassillis now passed to a cousin, Archibald Kennedy, a captain in the royal navy, whose father, Archibald Kennedy (d. 1763), had migrated to America in 1722 and had become collector of customs in New York. His son, the 11th earl, had estates in New Jersey and married an American heiress; in 1765 he was said to own more houses in New York than any one else. He died in London on the 30th of December 1794, and was succeeded by his son Archibald (1770-1846), who was created Baron Ailsa in 1806 and marquess of Ailsa in 1831. His great-grandson Archibald (b. 1847) became 3rd marquess.
The titles and estates of the Kennedys were now claimed by William Douglas, later the duke of Queensberry, a great-grandson through the female line of the 7th earl, and also by Sir Thomas Kennedy, Bart., of Culzean, a descendant of the 3rd earl, i.e., by both the heir general and the heir male. In January 1762, the House of Lords ruled in favor of the heir male, and Sir Thomas became the 9th earl of Cassillis. He died unmarried on November 30, 1775, and his brother David, the 10th earl, also died unmarried on December 18, 1792, when the baronetcy became extinct. The earldom of Cassillis then passed to a cousin, Archibald Kennedy, a captain in the royal navy, whose father, Archibald Kennedy (d. 1763), had moved to America in 1722 and had become the customs collector in New York. His son, the 11th earl, owned land in New Jersey and married an American heiress; by 1765, he was said to own more houses in New York than anyone else. He died in London on December 30, 1794, and was succeeded by his son Archibald (1770-1846), who was made Baron Ailsa in 1806 and marquess of Ailsa in 1831. His great-grandson Archibald (b. 1847) became the 3rd marquess.
See the article in vol. ii. of Sir R. Douglas’s Peerage of Scotland, edited by Sir J. B. Paul (1905). This is written by Lord Ailsa’s son and heir, Archibald Kennedy, earl of Cassillis (b. 1872).
See the article in vol. ii. of Sir R. Douglas’s Peerage of Scotland, edited by Sir J. B. Paul (1905). This is written by Lord Ailsa’s son and heir, Archibald Kennedy, earl of Cassillis (b. 1872).

KENNEDY, BENJAMIN HALL (1804-1889), English scholar, was born at Summer Hill, near Birmingham, on the 6th of November 1804, the eldest son of Rann Kennedy (1772-1851), who came of a branch of the Ayrshire family which had settled in Staffordshire. Rann Kennedy was a scholar and man of letters, several of whose sons rose to distinction. B. H. Kennedy was educated at Birmingham and Shrewsbury schools, and St John’s College, Cambridge. After a brilliant university career he was elected fellow and classical lecturer of St John’s College in 1828. Two years later he became an assistant master at Harrow, whence he went to Shrewsbury as headmaster in 1836. He retained this post until 1866, the thirty years of his rule being marked by a long series of successes won by his pupils, chiefly in classics. When he retired from Shrewsbury a large sum was collected as a testimonial to him, and was devoted partly to the new school buildings and partly to the founding of a Latin professorship at Cambridge. The first two occupants of the chair were both Kennedy’s old pupils, H. A. J. 731 Munro and J. E. B. Mayor. In 1867 he was elected regius professor of Greek at Cambridge and canon of Ely. From 1870 to 1880 he was a member of the committee for the revision of the New Testament. He was an enthusiastic advocate for the admission of women to a university education, and took a prominent part in the establishment of Newnham and Girton colleges. He was also a keen politician of liberal sympathies. He died near Torquay on the 6th of April 1889. Among a number of classical school-books published by him are two, a Public School Latin Primer and Public School Latin Grammar, which were for long in use in nearly all English schools.
KENNEDY, BENJAMIN HALL (1804-1889), an English scholar, was born at Summer Hill, near Birmingham, on November 6, 1804. He was the eldest son of Rann Kennedy (1772-1851), who came from a branch of the Ayrshire family that settled in Staffordshire. Rann Kennedy was a scholar and man of letters, and several of his sons achieved distinction. B. H. Kennedy was educated at Birmingham and Shrewsbury schools, and St John’s College, Cambridge. After an impressive university career, he was elected fellow and classical lecturer of St John’s College in 1828. Two years later, he became an assistant master at Harrow, and in 1836 he moved to Shrewsbury as headmaster. He held this position until 1866, during which his thirty years of leadership saw many of his students achieve remarkable success, particularly in classics. Upon retiring from Shrewsbury, a significant amount of money was raised as a tribute to him, which helped fund new school buildings and establish a Latin professorship at Cambridge. The first two people to hold that position were both Kennedy’s former students, H. A. J. Munro and J. E. B. Mayor. In 1867, he was appointed regius professor of Greek at Cambridge and became canon of Ely. From 1870 to 1880, he served on the committee for the revision of the New Testament. He was a passionate supporter of women's admission to university education and played a key role in founding Newnham and Girton colleges. He was also an active politician with liberal views. He passed away near Torquay on April 6, 1889. Among several classical school books he published are two, a Public School Latin Primer and Public School Latin Grammar, which were used for many years in nearly all English schools.
His other chief works are: Sophocles, Oedipus Tyrannus (2nd ed., 1885), Aristophanes, Birds (1874); Aeschylus, Agamemnon (2nd ed., 1882), with introduction, metrical translation and notes; a commentary on Virgil (3rd ed., 1881); and a translation of Plato, Theaetetus (1881). He contributed largely to the collection known as Sabrinae Corolla, and published a collection of verse in Greek, Latin and English under the title of Between Whiles (2nd ed., 1882), with many autobiographical details.
His other main works include: Sophocles, Oedipus Tyrannus (2nd ed., 1885), Aristophanes, Birds (1874); Aeschylus, Agamemnon (2nd ed., 1882), which comes with an introduction, metrical translation, and notes; a commentary on Virgil (3rd ed., 1881); and a translation of Plato, Theaetetus (1881). He made significant contributions to the collection known as Sabrinae Corolla, and published a collection of poems in Greek, Latin, and English titled Between Whiles (2nd ed., 1882), which includes many autobiographical details.
His brother, Charles Rann Kennedy (1808-1867), was educated at Shrewsbury school and Trinity College, Cambridge, where he graduated as senior classic (1831). He then became a barrister. From 1849-1856 he was professor of law at Queen’s College, Birmingham. As adviser to Mrs Swinfen, the plaintiff in the celebrated will case Swinfen v. Swinfen (1856), he brought an action for remuneration for professional services, but the verdict given in his favour at Warwick assizes was set aside by the court of Common Pleas, on the ground that a barrister could not sue for the recovery of his fees. The excellence of Kennedy’s scholarship is abundantly proved by his translation of the orations of Demosthenes (1852-1863, in Bohn’s Classical Library), and his blank verse translation of the works of Virgil (1861). He was also the author of New Rules for Pleading (2nd ed., 1841) and A Treatise on Annuities (1846). He died in Birmingham on the 17th of December 1867.
His brother, Charles Rann Kennedy (1808-1867), was educated at Shrewsbury School and Trinity College, Cambridge, where he graduated as the top student in classics (1831). He then became a barrister. From 1849 to 1856, he was a law professor at Queen’s College, Birmingham. As an adviser to Mrs. Swinfen, the plaintiff in the famous will case Swinfen v. Swinfen (1856), he filed a lawsuit for payment for his professional services, but the favorable verdict he received at Warwick Assizes was overturned by the Court of Common Pleas, on the basis that a barrister couldn't sue to collect his fees. The quality of Kennedy’s scholarship is clearly demonstrated by his translation of the orations of Demosthenes (1852-1863, in Bohn’s Classical Library) and his blank verse translation of Virgil’s works (1861). He also wrote New Rules for Pleading (2nd ed., 1841) and A Treatise on Annuities (1846). He passed away in Birmingham on December 17, 1867.
Another brother, Rev. William James Kennedy (1814-1891), was a prominent educationalist, and the father of Lord Justice Sir William Rann Kennedy (b. 1846), himself a distinguished Cambridge scholar.
Another brother, Rev. William James Kennedy (1814-1891), was a well-known educator and the father of Lord Justice Sir William Rann Kennedy (b. 1846), who was also a notable scholar at Cambridge.

KENNEDY, THOMAS FRANCIS (1788-1879), Scottish politician, was born near Ayr in 1788. He studied for the bar and became advocate in 1811. Having been elected M.P. for the Ayr burghs in 1818, he devoted the greater part of his life to the promotion of Liberal reforms. In 1820 he married the only daughter of Sir Samuel Romilly. He was greatly assisted by Lord Cockburn, then Mr Henry Cockburn, and a volume of correspondence published by Kennedy in 1874 forms a curious and interesting record of the consultations of the two friends on measures which they regarded as requisite for the political regeneration of their native country. One of the first measures to which he directed his attention was the withdrawal of the power of nominating juries from the judges, and the imparting of a right of peremptory challenge to prisoners. Among other subjects were the improvement of the parish schools, of pauper administration, and of several of the corrupt forms of legal procedure which then prevailed. In the construction of the Scottish Reform Act Kennedy took a prominent part; indeed he and Lord Cockburn may almost be regarded as its authors. After the accession of the Whigs to office in 1832 he held various important offices in the ministry, and most of the measures of reform for Scotland, such as burgh reform, the improvements in the law of entail, and the reform of the sheriff courts, owed much to his sagacity and energy. In 1837 he went to Ireland as paymaster of civil services, and set himself to the promotion of various measures of reform. Kennedy retired from office in 1854, but continued to take keen interest in political affairs, and up to his death in 1879 took a great part in both county and parish business. He had a stern love of justice, and a determined hatred of everything savouring of jobbery or dishonesty.
KENNEDY, THOMAS FRANCIS (1788-1879), Scottish politician, was born near Ayr in 1788. He studied law and became an advocate in 1811. After being elected M.P. for the Ayr burghs in 1818, he dedicated most of his life to promoting Liberal reforms. In 1820, he married the only daughter of Sir Samuel Romilly. He was greatly supported by Lord Cockburn, then known as Mr. Henry Cockburn, and a collection of correspondence published by Kennedy in 1874 serves as a fascinating record of their discussions on measures they believed were essential for the political revitalization of their home country. One of the first issues he focused on was taking away judges' power to nominate juries and giving prisoners the right to challenge jurors. Other topics included improving parish schools, managing poor relief, and addressing various corrupt legal procedures that were common at the time. Kennedy played a key role in the development of the Scottish Reform Act; in fact, he and Lord Cockburn can be seen as its main authors. After the Whigs came to power in 1832, he held several important roles in the government, and many reform initiatives for Scotland, such as burgh reform, improvements to the law of entail, and reform of the sheriff courts, benefitted greatly from his insight and energy. In 1837, he went to Ireland as paymaster of civil services, working to promote various reform measures. Kennedy stepped down from office in 1854 but remained actively engaged in political matters, playing a significant role in both county and parish affairs until his death in 1879. He had a strong commitment to justice and a deep disdain for any hint of corruption or dishonesty.

KENNEDY, WALTER (c. 1460-c. 1508), Scottish poet, was the third son of Gilbert, 1st Lord Kennedy. He matriculated at Glasgow University in 1475 and took his M.A. degree in 1478. In 1481 he was one of four examiners in his university, and in 1492 he acted as depute for his nephew, the hereditary bailie of Carrick. He is best known for his share in the Flyting with Dunbar (q.v.). In this coarse combat of wits Dunbar taunts his rival with his Highland speech (the poem is an expression of Gaelic and “Inglis,” i.e. English, antagonism); and implies that he had been involved in treason, and had disguised himself as a beggar in Galloway. With the exception of this share in the Flyting Kennedy’s poems are chiefly religious in character. They include The Praise of Aige, Ane Agit Manis Invective against Mouth Thankless, Ane Ballat in Praise of Our Lady, The Passion of Christ and Pious Counsale. They are printed in the rare supplement to David Laing’s edition of William Dunbar (1834), and they have been re-edited by Dr J. Schipper in the proceedings of the Kais. Akad. der Wissenschaften (Vienna).
KENNEDY, WALTER (c. 1460-c. 1508), Scottish poet, was the third son of Gilbert, 1st Lord Kennedy. He enrolled at Glasgow University in 1475 and earned his M.A. degree in 1478. In 1481, he was one of four examiners at the university, and in 1492 he served as deputy for his nephew, the hereditary bailie of Carrick. He is most well-known for his role in the Flyting with Dunbar (q.v.). In this harsh exchange of insults, Dunbar mocks his opponent's Highland speech (the poem reflects the conflict between Gaelic and “Inglis,” i.e. English); and insinuates that he had been implicated in treason and had disguised himself as a beggar in Galloway. Aside from his involvement in the Flyting, Kennedy’s poems are primarily religious in nature. They include The Praise of Aige, Ane Agit Manis Invective against Mouth Thankless, Ane Ballat in Praise of Our Lady, The Passion of Christ, and Pious Counsale. These works are printed in the rare supplement to David Laing’s edition of William Dunbar (1834), and they have been re-edited by Dr. J. Schipper in the proceedings of the Kais. Akad. der Wissenschaften (Vienna).
See also the prolegomena in the Scottish Text Society’s edition of Dunbar; and (for the life) Pitcairn’s edition of the Historie of the Kennedies (1830).
See also the introduction in the Scottish Text Society’s edition of Dunbar; and (for the life) Pitcairn’s edition of the Historie of the Kennedies (1830).

KENNEL, a small hut or shelter for a dog, also extended to a group of buildings for a pack of hounds (see Dog). The word is apparently from a Norman-French kenil (this form does not occur, but is seen in the Norman kinet, a little dog), modern French chenil, from popular Latin canile, place for a dog, canis, cf. ovile, sheep-cote. The word “kennel,” a gutter, a drain in a street or road, is a corruption of the Middle English canel, cannel, in modern English “channel,” from Latin canalis, canal.
KENNEL, a small hut or shelter for a dog, also refers to a group of buildings for a pack of hounds (see Dog). The word likely comes from Norman-French kenil (this exact form isn't found, but it appears in the Norman kinet, a small dog), modern French chenil, from popular Latin canile, meaning a place for a dog, derived from canis, similar to ovile, a sheep pen. The word “kennel,” meaning a gutter or drain in a street or road, is a variation of Middle English canel, cannel, which in modern English is “channel,” from Latin canalis, canal.

Kenneth I., MacAlpin (d. c. 860), often described as the first king of Scotland (kingdom of Scone), was the son of the Alpin, called king of the Scots, who had been slain by the Picts in 832 or 834, whilst endeavouring to assert his claim to the Pictish throne. On the death of his father, Kenneth is said to have succeeded him in the kingdom of the Scots. The region of his rule is matter of conjecture, though Galloway seems the most probable suggestion, in which case he probably led a piratic host against the Picts. On the father’s side he was descended from the Conall Gabhrain of the old Dalriadic Scottish kingdom, and the claims of father and son to the Pictish throne were probably through female descent. Their chief support seems to have been found in Fife. In the seventh year of his reign (839 or 841) he took advantage of the effects of a Danish invasion of the Pictish kingdom to attack the remaining Picts, whom he finally subdued in 844 or 846. In 846 or 848 he transported the relics of St Columba to a church which he had constructed at Scone. He is said also to have carried out six invasions of Northumbria, in the course of which he burnt Dunbar and took Melrose. According to the Scalacronica of Sir Thomas Gray he drove the Angles and Britons over the Tweed, reduced the land as far as that river, and first called his kingdom Scotland. In his reign there appears to have been a serious invasion by Danish pirates, in which Cluny and Dunkeld were burnt. He died in 860 or 862, after a reign of twenty-eight years, at Forteviot and was buried at Iona. The double dates are due to a contest of authorities. Twenty-eight years is the accepted length of his reign, and according to the chronicle of Henry of Huntingdon it began in 832. The Pictish Chronicle, however, gives Tuesday, the 13th of February as the day, and this suits 862 only, in which case his reign would begin in 834.
Kenneth I., MacAlpin (d. c. 860), often referred to as the first king of Scotland (kingdom of Scone), was the son of Alpin, known as king of the Scots, who was killed by the Picts in 832 or 834 while trying to claim the Pictish throne. After his father's death, Kenneth is believed to have taken over the kingdom of the Scots. The exact area he ruled is uncertain, but Galloway is the most likely candidate, where he probably led a raiding party against the Picts. He was descended from Conall Gabhrain of the ancient Dalriadic Scottish kingdom on his father's side, and both he and his father probably claimed the Pictish throne through female ancestry. Their main support seems to have come from Fife. In the seventh year of his reign (839 or 841), he exploited the consequences of a Danish invasion of the Pictish kingdom to attack the surviving Picts, whom he ultimately conquered in 844 or 846. In 846 or 848, he moved the relics of St Columba to a church he built at Scone. He is also said to have launched six invasions of Northumbria, during which he burned Dunbar and captured Melrose. According to the Scalacronica by Sir Thomas Gray, he pushed the Angles and Britons back over the Tweed, brought the territory as far as that river under control, and was the first to name his kingdom Scotland. During his reign, there seems to have been a significant invasion by Danish pirates, which resulted in the burning of Cluny and Dunkeld. He died in 860 or 862, after ruling for twenty-eight years, at Forteviot and was buried at Iona. The double dates arise from differing historical sources. Twenty-eight years is the recognized length of his rule, which, according to Henry of Huntingdon's chronicle, began in 832. However, the Pictish Chronicle states that it began on Tuesday, February 13, which only aligns with 862, suggesting his reign might have started in 834.
Kenneth II. (d. 995), son of Malcolm I., king of Alban, succeeded Cuilean, son of Indulph, who had been slain by the Britons of Strathclyde in 971 in Lothian. Kenneth began his reign by ravaging the British kingdom, but he lost a large part of his force on the river Cornag. Soon afterwards he attacked Eadulf, earl of the northern half of Northumbria, and ravaged the whole of his territory. He fortified the fords of the Forth as a defence against the Britons and again invaded Northumbria, carrying off the earl’s son. About this time he gave the city of Brechin to the church. In 977 he is said to have slain Amlaiph or Olaf, son of Indulph, king of Alban, perhaps a rival claimant 732 to the throne. According to the English chroniclers, Kenneth paid homage to King Edgar for the cession of Lothian, but these statements are probably due to the controversy as to the position of Scotland. The mormaers, or chiefs, of Kenneth were engaged throughout his reign in a contest with Sigurd the Norwegian, earl of Orkney, for the possession of Caithness and the northern district of Scotland as far south as the Spey. In this struggle the Scots attained no permanent success. In 995 Kenneth, whose strength like that of the other kings of his branch of the house of Kenneth MacAlpin lay chiefly north of the Tay, was slain treacherously by his own subjects, according to the later chroniclers at Fettercairn in the Mearns through an intrigue of Einvela, daughter of the earl of Angus. He was buried at Iona.
Kenneth II. (d. 995), son of Malcolm I, king of Alban, took over from Cuilean, son of Indulph, who was killed by the Britons of Strathclyde in 971 in Lothian. Kenneth started his reign by attacking the British kingdom, but he lost a significant part of his army at the river Cornag. Soon after, he went after Eadulf, earl of the northern part of Northumbria, and devastated his entire territory. He strengthened the fords of the Forth to protect against the Britons and invaded Northumbria again, capturing the earl’s son. Around this time, he gave the city of Brechin to the church. In 977, he is said to have killed Amlaiph or Olaf, son of Indulph, king of Alban, who may have been a rival for the throne. According to English chroniclers, Kenneth swore loyalty to King Edgar for the transfer of Lothian, but these claims likely stem from debates over Scotland's status. The mormaers, or chiefs, under Kenneth were constantly in conflict with Sigurd the Norwegian, earl of Orkney, over control of Caithness and the northern part of Scotland down to the Spey. In this struggle, the Scots achieved no lasting victories. In 995, Kenneth, whose power, like that of other kings from his line of the house of Kenneth MacAlpin, was mainly based north of the Tay, was treacherously killed by his own people, according to later chroniclers, at Fettercairn in the Mearns due to a plot by Einvela, daughter of the earl of Angus. He was buried at Iona.
See Chronicles of the Picts and Scots, ed. W. F. Skene (Edinburgh, 1867), and W. F. Skene, Celtic Scotland (Edinburgh, 1876).
See Chronicles of the Picts and Scots, ed. W. F. Skene (Edinburgh, 1867), and W. F. Skene, Celtic Scotland (Edinburgh, 1876).

KENNETT, WHITE (1660-1728), English bishop and antiquary, was born at Dover in August 1660. He was educated at Westminster school and at St Edmund’s Hall, Oxford, where, while an undergraduate, he published several translations of Latin works, including Erasmus In Praise of Folly. In 1685 he became vicar of Ambrosden, Oxfordshire. A few years afterwards he returned to Oxford as tutor and vice-principal of St Edmund’s Hall, where he gave considerable impetus to the study of antiquities. George Hickes gave him lessons in Old English. In 1695 he published Parochial Antiquities. In 1700 he became rector of St Botolph’s, Aldgate, London, and in 1701 archdeacon of Huntingdon. For a eulogistic sermon on the first duke of Devonshire he was in 1707 recommended to the deanery of Peterborough. He afterwards joined the Low Church party, strenuously opposed the Sacheverel movement, and in the Bangorian controversy supported with great zeal and considerable bitterness the side of Bishop Hoadly. His intimacy with Charles Trimnell, bishop of Norwich, who was high in favour with the king, secured for him in 1718 the bishopric of Peterborough. He died at Westminster in December 1728.
KENNETT, WHITE (1660-1728), an English bishop and antiquarian, was born in Dover in August 1660. He attended Westminster School and St Edmund’s Hall, Oxford, where he published several translations of Latin works, including Erasmus's In Praise of Folly, while still an undergraduate. In 1685, he became the vicar of Ambrosden in Oxfordshire. A few years later, he returned to Oxford as a tutor and vice-principal of St Edmund’s Hall, significantly promoting the study of antiquities. George Hickes taught him Old English. In 1695, he published Parochial Antiquities. In 1700, he became the rector of St Botolph’s, Aldgate, London, and in 1701, he was appointed archdeacon of Huntingdon. For a commendatory sermon on the first duke of Devonshire, he was recommended for the deanery of Peterborough in 1707. He later joined the Low Church party, strongly opposed the Sacheverel movement, and passionately supported Bishop Hoadly in the Bangorian controversy, often with considerable bitterness. His close relationship with Charles Trimnell, the bishop of Norwich, who was favored by the king, led to him being appointed bishop of Peterborough in 1718. He passed away in Westminster in December 1728.
Kennett published in 1698 an edition of Sir Henry Spelman’s History of Sacrilege, and he was the author of fifty-seven printed works, chiefly tracts and sermons. He wrote the third volume (Charles I.-Anne) of the composite Compleat History of England (1706), and a more detailed and valuable Register and Chronicle of the Restoration. He was much interested in the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel.
Kennett published an edition of Sir Henry Spelman's History of Sacrilege in 1698, and he authored fifty-seven printed works, mainly tracts and sermons. He wrote the third volume (Charles I.-Anne) of the combined Compleat History of England (1706), along with a more detailed and valuable Register and Chronicle of the Restoration. He was very interested in the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel.
The Life of Bishop White Kennett, by the Rev. William Newton (anonymous), appeared in 1730. See also Nichols’s Literary Anecdotes, and I. Disraeli’s Calamities of Authors.
The Life of Bishop White Kennett, by Rev. William Newton (anonymous), was published in 1730. Also, check out Nichols’s Literary Anecdotes and I. Disraeli’s Calamities of Authors.

KENNEY, JAMES (1780-1849), English dramatist, was the son of James Kenney, one of the founders of Boodles’ Club in London. His first play, a farce called Raising the Wind (1803), was a success owing to the popularity of the character of “Jeremy Diddler.” Kenney produced more than forty dramas and operas between 1803 and 1845, and many of his pieces, in which Mrs Siddons, Madame Vestris, Foote, Lewis, Liston and other leading players appeared from time to time, enjoyed a considerable vogue. His most popular play was Sweethearts and Wives, produced at the Haymarket theatre in 1823, and several times afterwards revived; and among the most successful of his other works were: False Alarms (1807), a comic opera with music by Braham; Love, Law and Physic (1812); Spring and Autumn (1827); The Illustrious Stranger, or Married and Buried (1827); Masaniello (1829); The Sicilian Vespers, a tragedy (1840). Kenney, who numbered Charles Lamb and Samuel Rogers among his friends, died in London on the 25th of July 1849. He married the widow of the dramatist Thomas Holcroft, by whom he had two sons and two daughters.
KENNEY, JAMES (1780-1849), was an English playwright and the son of James Kenney, one of the founders of Boodles’ Club in London. His first play, a farce titled Raising the Wind (1803), became a hit thanks to the popularity of the character “Jeremy Diddler.” Kenney wrote over forty dramas and operas between 1803 and 1845, and many of his works featured leading actors like Mrs. Siddons, Madame Vestris, Foote, Lewis, Liston, and others, gaining significant popularity. His most famous play was Sweethearts and Wives, staged at the Haymarket theatre in 1823 and revived several times afterwards; among his other successful works were: False Alarms (1807), a comic opera with music by Braham; Love, Law and Physic (1812); Spring and Autumn (1827); The Illustrious Stranger, or Married and Buried (1827); Masaniello (1829); and The Sicilian Vespers, a tragedy (1840). Kenney, who counted Charles Lamb and Samuel Rogers among his friends, passed away in London on July 25, 1849. He married the widow of playwright Thomas Holcroft, with whom he had two sons and two daughters.
His second son, Charles Lamb Kenney (1823-1881), made a name as a journalist, dramatist and miscellaneous writer. Commencing life as a clerk in the General Post Office in London, he joined the staff of The Times, to which paper he contributed dramatic criticism. In 1856, having been called to the bar, he became secretary to Ferdinand de Lesseps, and in 1857 he published The Gates of the East in support of the projected construction of the Suez Canal. Kenney wrote the words for a number of light operas, and was the author of several popular songs, the best known of which were “Soft and Low” (1865) and “The Vagabond” (1871). He also published a Memoir of M. W. Balfe (1875), and translated the Correspondence of Balzac. He included Thackeray and Dickens among his friends in a literary coterie in which he enjoyed the reputation of a wit and an accomplished writer of vers de société. He died in London on the 25th of August 1881.
His second son, Charles Lamb Kenney (1823-1881), became known as a journalist, playwright, and versatile writer. He started out as a clerk at the General Post Office in London and then joined the staff of The Times, where he contributed to dramatic criticism. In 1856, after being called to the bar, he became secretary to Ferdinand de Lesseps, and in 1857 he published The Gates of the East in support of the planned construction of the Suez Canal. Kenney wrote lyrics for several light operas and authored a number of popular songs, with “Soft and Low” (1865) and “The Vagabond” (1871) being the most famous. He also published a Memoir of M. W. Balfe (1875) and translated Balzac’s Correspondence. He counted Thackeray and Dickens among his friends in a literary group where he was known for his wit and skill in writing vers de société. He died in London on August 25, 1881.
See John Genest, Some Account of the English Stage, 1660-1830, vols. vii. and viii. (10 vols., London, 1832); P. W. Clayden, Rogers and his Contemporaries (2 vols., London, 1889); Dict. National Biog.
See John Genest, Some Account of the English Stage, 1660-1830, vols. vii. and viii. (10 vols., London, 1832); P. W. Clayden, Rogers and his Contemporaries (2 vols., London, 1889); Dict. National Biog.

KENNGOTT, GUSTAV ADOLPH (1818-1897), German mineralogist, was born at Breslau on the 6th of January 1818. After being employed in the Hofmineralien Cabinet at Vienna, he became professor of mineralogy in the university of Zürich. He was distinguished for his researches on mineralogy, crystallography and petrology. He died at Lugano, on the 7th of March 1897.
KENNGOTT, GUSTAV ADOLPH (1818-1897), a German mineralogist, was born in Breslau on January 6, 1818. After working at the Hofmineralien Cabinet in Vienna, he became a professor of mineralogy at the University of Zürich. He was renowned for his research in mineralogy, crystallography, and petrology. He passed away in Lugano on March 7, 1897.
Publications.—Lehrbuch der reinen Krystallographie (1846); Lehrbuch der Mineralogie (1852 and 1857; 5th ed., 1880); Übersicht der Resultate mineralogischer Forschungen in den Jahren 1844-1865 (7 vols., 1852-1868); Die Minerale der Schweiz (1866); Elemente der Petrographie (1868).
Publications.—Textbook of Pure Crystallography (1846); Textbook of Mineralogy (1852 and 1857; 5th ed., 1880); Overview of Results from Mineralogical Research from 1844-1865 (7 vols., 1852-1868); The Minerals of Switzerland (1866); Elements of Petrography (1868).

KENNICOTT, BENJAMIN (1718-1783), English divine and Hebrew scholar, was born at Totnes, Devonshire, on the 4th of April 1718. He succeeded his father as master of a charity school, but by the liberality of friends he was enabled to go to Wadham College, Oxford, in 1744, where he distinguished himself in Hebrew and divinity. While an undergraduate he published two dissertations, On the Tree of Life in Paradise, with some Observations on the Fall of Man, and On the Oblations of Cain and Abel (2nd ed., 1747), which procured him the honour of a bachelor’s degree before the statutory time. In 1747 he was elected fellow of Exeter College, and in 1750 he took his degree of M.A. In 1764 he was made a fellow of the Royal Society, and in 1767 keeper of the Radcliffe Library. He was also canon of Christ Church (1770) and rector of Culham (1753), in Oxfordshire, and was subsequently presented to the living of Menheniot, Cornwall, which he was unable to visit and resigned two years before his death. He died at Oxford, on the 18th of September 1783.
KENNICOTT, BENJAMIN (1718-1783), an English clergyman and Hebrew scholar, was born in Totnes, Devonshire, on April 4, 1718. He took over as master of a charity school after his father, but thanks to the generosity of friends, he was able to attend Wadham College, Oxford, in 1744, where he excelled in Hebrew and theology. While still an undergraduate, he published two dissertations, On the Tree of Life in Paradise, with some Observations on the Fall of Man and On the Oblations of Cain and Abel (2nd ed., 1747), which earned him a bachelor’s degree before the usual time. In 1747, he was elected a fellow of Exeter College, and in 1750, he received his M.A. degree. In 1764, he became a fellow of the Royal Society, and in 1767, he was appointed keeper of the Radcliffe Library. He also served as a canon of Christ Church (1770) and rector of Culham (1753) in Oxfordshire, and was later given the living of Menheniot, Cornwall, which he could not visit, and he resigned two years before his death. He passed away in Oxford on September 18, 1783.
His chief work is the Vetus Testamentum hebraicum cum variis lectionibus (2 vols. fol., Oxford, 1776-1780). Before this appeared he had written two dissertations entitled The State of the Printed Hebrew Text of the Old Testament considered, published respectively in 1753 and 1759, which were designed to combat the then current ideas as to the “absolute integrity” of the received Hebrew text. The first contains “a comparison of 1 Chron. xi. with 2 Sam. v. and xxiii. and observations on seventy MSS., with an extract of mistakes and various readings”; the second defends the claims of the Samaritan Pentateuch, assails the correctness of the printed copies of the Chaldee paraphrase, gives an account of Hebrew MSS. of the Bible known to be extant, and catalogues one hundred MSS. preserved in the British Museum and in the libraries of Oxford and Cambridge. In 1760 he issued his proposals for collating all Hebrew MSS. of date prior to the invention of printing. Subscriptions to the amount of nearly £10,000 were obtained, and many learned men addressed themselves to the work of collation, Bruns of Helmstadt making himself specially useful as regarded MSS. in Germany, Switzerland and Italy. Between 1760 and 1769 ten “annual accounts” of the progress of the work were given; in its course 615 Hebrew MSS. and 52 printed editions of the Bible were either wholly or partially collated, and use was also made (but often very perfunctorily) of the quotations in the Talmud. The materials thus collected, when properly arranged and made ready for the press, extended to 30 vols. fol. The text finally followed in printing was that of Van der Hooght—unpointed however, the points having been disregarded in collation—and the various readings were printed at the foot of the page. The Samaritan Pentateuch stands alongside the Hebrew in parallel columns. The Dissertatio generalis, appended to the second volume, contains an account of the MSS. and other authorities collated, and also a review of the Hebrew text, divided into periods, and beginning with the formation of the Hebrew canon after the return of the Jews from the exile. Kennicott’s great work was in one sense a failure. It yielded no materials of value for the emendation of the received text, and by disregarding the vowel points overlooked the one thing in which some result (grammatical if not critical) might have been derived from collation of Massoretic MSS. But the negative result of the publication and of the Variæ 733 lectiones of De Rossi, published some years later, was important. It showed that the Hebrew text can be emended only by the use of the versions aided by conjecture.
His main work is the Vetus Testamentum hebraicum cum variis lectionibus (2 vols. fol., Oxford, 1776-1780). Before it was published, he wrote two essays titled The State of the Printed Hebrew Text of the Old Testament considered, which came out in 1753 and 1759, aimed at challenging the prevailing belief in the "absolute integrity" of the accepted Hebrew text. The first essay includes “a comparison of 1 Chron. xi. with 2 Sam. v. and xxiii. and observations on seventy manuscripts, along with an extract of errors and various readings”; the second defends the claims of the Samaritan Pentateuch, criticizes the accuracy of the printed versions of the Chaldee paraphrase, discusses known Hebrew manuscripts of the Bible, and lists one hundred manuscripts kept in the British Museum and the libraries of Oxford and Cambridge. In 1760, he announced plans to collate all Hebrew manuscripts dating before the invention of printing. Nearly £10,000 in subscriptions were raised, and many scholars participated in the collation work, with Bruns from Helmstadt being particularly helpful regarding manuscripts in Germany, Switzerland, and Italy. From 1760 to 1769, ten “annual accounts” of the progress were published; during this time, 615 Hebrew manuscripts and 52 printed Bible editions were either fully or partially collated, and quotations from the Talmud were also referenced, though often somewhat carelessly. The collected materials, once organized and prepared for publication, amounted to 30 folio volumes. The printed text ultimately followed was that of Van der Hooght, although it was unpointed—the vowel points were not considered in the collation—and the various readings appeared at the bottom of the page. The Samaritan Pentateuch is presented alongside the Hebrew in parallel columns. The Dissertatio generalis at the end of the second volume includes a description of the manuscripts and other sources collated, as well as a review of the Hebrew text categorized into periods, starting with the formation of the Hebrew canon after the Jews returned from exile. In some respects, Kennicott’s major work was a disappointment. It provided no valuable materials for correcting the accepted text and neglecting the vowel points missed the one aspect from which some results (grammatical if not critical) could have been gained from collating Massoretic manuscripts. However, the negative outcomes of the publication and the Variæ 733 lectiones by De Rossi, released a few years later, were significant. They demonstrated that the Hebrew text can only be improved by using the versions alongside conjecture.
Kennicott’s work was perpetuated by his widow, who founded two university scholarships at Oxford for the study of Hebrew. The fund yields an income of £200 per annum.
Kennicott’s work was continued by his widow, who created two university scholarships at Oxford for studying Hebrew. The fund provides an annual income of £200.

KENNINGTON, a district in the south of London, England, within the municipal borough of Lambeth. There was a royal palace here until the reign of Henry VII. Kennington Common, now represented by Kennington Park, was the site of a gallows until the end of the 18th century, and was the meeting-place appointed for the great Chartist demonstration of the 10th of April 1848. Kennington Oval is the ground of the Surrey County Cricket Club. (See Lambeth.)
KENNINGTON, a neighborhood in the south of London, England, within the borough of Lambeth. There was a royal palace here until the time of Henry VII. Kennington Common, now known as Kennington Park, was the site of a gallows until the late 18th century and was the chosen location for the major Chartist demonstration on April 10, 1848. Kennington Oval is the home ground of the Surrey County Cricket Club. (See Lambeth.)

KENORA (formerly Rat Portage), a town and port of entry in Ontario, Canada, and the chief town of Rainy River district, situated at an altitude of 1087 ft. above the sea. Pop. (1891), 1806; (1901) 5222. It is 133 m. by rail east of Winnipeg, on the Canadian Pacific railway, and at the outlet of the Lake of the Woods. The Winnipeg river has at this point a fall of 16 ft., which, with the lake as a reservoir, furnishes an abundant and unfailing water-power. The industrial establishments comprise reduction works, saw-mills and flour-mills, one of the latter being the largest in Canada. It is the distributing point for the gold mines of the district, and during the summer months steamboat communication is maintained on the lake. There is important sturgeon fishing.
KENORA (formerly Rat Portage), a town and port of entry in Ontario, Canada, is the main town of the Rainy River district, located at an elevation of 1,087 feet above sea level. Population: (1891) 1,806; (1901) 5,222. It is 133 miles by rail east of Winnipeg, along the Canadian Pacific Railway, and situated at the outlet of the Lake of the Woods. The Winnipeg River drops 16 feet at this point, and with the lake serving as a reservoir, it provides a reliable and abundant water supply for power. The local industries include processing facilities, sawmills, and flour mills, one of which is the largest in Canada. Kenora serves as the distribution hub for the district's gold mines, and during the summer, steamboat services operate on the lake. There is also significant sturgeon fishing.

KENOSHA, a city and the county-seat of Kenosha county, Wisconsin, U.S.A., on the S.W. shore of Lake Michigan, 35 m. S. of Milwaukee and 50 m. N. of Chicago. Pop. (1900), 11,606, of whom 3333 were foreign-born; (1910), 21,371. It is served by the Chicago & North-Western railway, by interurban electric lines connecting with Chicago and Milwaukee, and by freight and passenger steamship lines on Lake Michigan. It has a good harbour and a considerable lake commerce. The city is finely situated on high bluffs above the lake, and is widely known for its healthiness. At Kenosha is the Gilbert M. Simmons library, with 19,300 volumes in 1908. Just south of the city is Kemper Hall, a Protestant Episcopal school for girls, under the charge of the Sisters of St Mary, opened in 1870 as a memorial to Jackson Kemper (1789-1870), the first missionary bishop (1835-1859), and the first bishop of Wisconsin (1854-1870) of the Protestant Episcopal Church. Among Kenosha’s manufactures are brass and iron beds (the Simmons Manufacturing Co.), mattresses, typewriters, leather and brass goods, wagons, and automobiles—the “Rambler” automobile being made at Kenosha by Thomas B. Jeffery and Co. There is an extensive sole-leather tannery. The total value of the factory product in 1905 was $12,362,600, the city ranking third in product value among the cities of the state. Kenosha, originally known as Southport, was settled about 1832, organized as the village of Southport in 1842, and chartered in 1850 as a city under its present name.
KENOSHA, is a city and the county seat of Kenosha County, Wisconsin, U.S.A., located on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan, 35 miles south of Milwaukee and 50 miles north of Chicago. Its population was 11,606 in 1900, with 3,333 of them being foreign-born; in 1910, it grew to 21,371. The city is served by the Chicago & North-Western Railway, interurban electric lines connecting with Chicago and Milwaukee, and by freight and passenger steamship lines on Lake Michigan. It boasts a good harbor and significant lake commerce. The city is beautifully situated on high bluffs above the lake and is well-known for its healthiness. Kenosha is home to the Gilbert M. Simmons Library, which had 19,300 volumes in 1908. Just south of the city is Kemper Hall, a Protestant Episcopal school for girls, run by the Sisters of St. Mary, which opened in 1870 as a memorial to Jackson Kemper (1789-1870), the first missionary bishop (1835-1859) and the first bishop of Wisconsin (1854-1870) of the Protestant Episcopal Church. Among Kenosha’s manufacturers are brass and iron beds (the Simmons Manufacturing Co.), mattresses, typewriters, leather and brass goods, wagons, and automobiles—the “Rambler” automobile is produced in Kenosha by Thomas B. Jeffery and Co. There is a large sole-leather tannery. The total value of factory production in 1905 was $12,362,600, making the city third in product value among the cities in the state. Kenosha, originally called Southport, was settled around 1832, organized as the village of Southport in 1842, and incorporated as a city under its current name in 1850.

KENSETT, JOHN FREDERICK (1818-1872), American artist, was born in Cheshire, Connecticut, on the 22nd of March 1818. After studying engraving he went abroad, took up painting, and exhibited at the Royal Academy, London, in 1845. In 1849 he was elected to the National Academy of Design, New York, and in 1859 he was appointed a member of the committee to superintend the decoration of the United States Capitol at Washington, D.C. After his death the contents of his studio realized at public auction over $150,000. He painted landscapes more or less in the manner of the Hudson River School.
KENSETT, JOHN FREDERICK (1818-1872), American artist, was born in Cheshire, Connecticut, on March 22, 1818. After studying engraving, he went abroad, took up painting, and exhibited at the Royal Academy in London in 1845. In 1849, he was elected to the National Academy of Design in New York, and in 1859, he was appointed a member of the committee responsible for overseeing the decoration of the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C. After his death, the contents of his studio were sold at public auction for over $150,000. He painted landscapes in a style similar to that of the Hudson River School.

KENSINGTON, a western metropolitan borough of London, England, bounded N.E. by Paddington, and the city of Westminster, S.E. by Chelsea, S.W. by Fulham, N.W. by Hammersmith, and extending N. to the boundary of the county of London. Pop. (1901), 176,628. It includes the districts of Kensal Green (partly) in the north, Notting Hill in the north-central portion, Earl’s Court in the south-west, and Brompton in the south-east. A considerable but indefinite area adjoining Brompton is commonly called South Kensington; but the area known as West Kensington is within the borough of Fulham.
KENSINGTON, is a western district of London, England, bordered to the northeast by Paddington and the City of Westminster, to the southeast by Chelsea, to the southwest by Fulham, and to the northwest by Hammersmith, extending north to the boundary of the County of London. Population (1901): 176,628. It includes the areas of Kensal Green (partly) in the north, Notting Hill in the north-central part, Earl's Court in the southwest, and Brompton in the southeast. A sizable but undefined area next to Brompton is generally referred to as South Kensington; however, the region known as West Kensington is part of Fulham.
The name appears in early forms as Chenesitun and Kenesitune. Its origin is obscure, and has been variously connected with a Saxon royal residence (King’s town), a family of the name of Chenesi, and the word caen, meaning wood, from the forest which originally covered the district and was still traceable in Tudor times. The most probable derivation, however, finds in the name a connection with the Saxon tribe or family of Kensings. The history of the manor is traceable from the time of Edward the Confessor, and after the Conquest it was held of the Bishop of Coutances by Aubrey de Vere. Soon after this it became the absolute property of the de Veres, who were subsequently created Earls of Oxford. The place of the manorial courts is preserved in the name of the modern district of Earl’s Court. With a few short intervals the manor continued in the direct line until Tudor times. There were also three sub-manors, one given by the first Aubrey de Vere early in the 12th century to the Abbot of Abingdon, whence the present parish church is called St Mary Abbots; while in another, Knotting Barnes, the origin of the name Notting Hill is found.
The name originally appears as Chenesitun and Kenesitune. Its origin is unclear and has been linked to a Saxon royal residence (King’s town), a family named Chenesi, and the word caen, which means wood, from the forest that originally covered the area and was still noticeable in Tudor times. However, the most likely origin connects the name to the Saxon tribe or family of Kensings. The history of the manor can be traced back to the time of Edward the Confessor, and after the Conquest, it was held by Aubrey de Vere under the Bishop of Coutances. Shortly after, it became the full property of the de Veres, who were later made Earls of Oxford. The location of the manorial courts is reflected in the modern district name of Earl’s Court. With a few brief exceptions, the manor remained in the direct line until Tudor times. There were also three sub-manors, one of which was given by the first Aubrey de Vere to the Abbot of Abingdon in the early 12th century, leading to the current parish church being called St Mary Abbots; while in another sub-manor, Knotting Barnes, we find the origin of the name Notting Hill.
The brilliant period of history for which Kensington is famous may be dated from the settlement of the Court here by William III. The village, as it was then, had a reputation for healthiness through its gravel soil and pure atmosphere. A mansion standing on the western flank of the present Kensington Gardens had been the seat of Heneage Finch, Lord Chancellor and afterwards Earl of Nottingham. It was known as Nottingham House, but when bought from the second earl by William, who was desirous of avoiding residence in London as he suffered from asthma, it became known as Kensington Palace. The extensive additions and alterations made by Wren according to the taste of the King resulted in a severely plain edifice of brick; the orangery, added in Queen Anne’s time, is a better example of the same architect’s work. In the palace died Mary, William’s consort, William himself, Anne and George II., whose wife Caroline did much to beautify Kensington Gardens, and formed the beautiful lake called the Serpentine (1733). But a higher interest attaches to the palace as the birthplace of Queen Victoria in 1819; and here her accession was announced to her. By her order, towards the close of her life, the palace became open to the public.
The famous period of history associated with Kensington began when William III settled the Court here. Back then, the village was known for its healthy environment due to its gravel soil and clean air. A mansion on the western side of what is now Kensington Gardens was the home of Heneage Finch, Lord Chancellor and later Earl of Nottingham. It was called Nottingham House, but when William bought it from the second earl, wanting to avoid living in London because of his asthma, it became Kensington Palace. The extensive changes made by Wren to suit the King’s taste resulted in a rather plain brick building; the orangery, added during Queen Anne’s reign, is a better example of Wren's work. Notable figures who died in the palace include Mary, William's wife, William himself, Anne, and George II., whose wife, Caroline, contributed greatly to the beauty of Kensington Gardens and created the lovely lake known as the Serpentine (1733). However, the palace holds a more significant interest as the birthplace of Queen Victoria in 1819, and it was here that her accession was announced. By her order, towards the end of her life, the palace was opened to the public.
Modern influences, one of the most marked of which is the widespread erection of vast blocks of residential flats, have swept away much that was reminiscent of the historical connexions of the “old court suburb.” Kensington Square, however, lying south of High Street in the vicinity of St Mary Abbots church, still preserves some of its picturesque houses, nearly all of which were formerly inhabited by those attached to the court; it numbered among its residents Addison, Talleyrand, John Stuart Mill, and Green the historian. In Young Street, opening from the Square, Thackeray lived for many years. His house here, still standing, is most commonly associated with his work, though he subsequently moved to Onslow Square and to Palace Green. Another link with the past is found in Holland House, hidden in its beautiful park north of Kensington Road. It was built by Sir Walter Cope, lord of the manor, in 1607, and obtained its present name on coming into the possession of Henry Rich, earl of Holland, through his marriage with Cope’s daughter. He extended and beautified the mansion. General Fairfax and General Lambert are mentioned as occupants after his death, and later the property was let, William Penn of Pennsylvania being among those who leased it. Addison, marrying the widow of the 6th earl, lived here until his death in 1719. During the tenancy of Henry Fox, third Lord Holland (1773-1840), the house gained a European reputation as a meeting-place of statesmen and men of letters. The formal gardens of Holland House are finely laid out, and the rooms of the house are both beautiful in themselves and enriched with collections of pictures, china and tapestries. Famous houses no longer standing were Campden House, in the district north-west of the parish church, formerly known as the Gravel Pits; and Gore House, on the site 734 of the present Albert Hall, the residence of William Wilberforce, and later of the countess of Blessington.
Modern influences, one of the most noticeable being the widespread construction of large apartment buildings, have erased much of what reminded us of the historical connections of the “old court suburb.” Kensington Square, however, located south of High Street near St Mary Abbots church, still retains some of its charming houses, nearly all of which were once home to those connected to the court; among its residents were Addison, Talleyrand, John Stuart Mill, and historian Green. In Young Street, which branches off from the Square, Thackeray lived for many years. His house here, still standing, is most often associated with his work, although he later moved to Onslow Square and Palace Green. Another connection to the past can be found in Holland House, nestled in its lovely park north of Kensington Road. It was built by Sir Walter Cope, lord of the manor, in 1607, and got its present name when it came into the possession of Henry Rich, earl of Holland, through his marriage to Cope’s daughter. He extended and beautified the mansion. General Fairfax and General Lambert are noted as occupants after his death, and later the property was rented out, with William Penn of Pennsylvania being among the tenants. Addison, who married the widow of the 6th earl, lived here until his death in 1719. During the tenure of Henry Fox, the third Lord Holland (1773-1840), the house became well-known throughout Europe as a gathering place for statesmen and intellectuals. The formal gardens of Holland House are beautifully designed, and the rooms of the house are both lovely and filled with collections of paintings, china, and tapestries. Renowned houses that no longer exist included Campden House, located in the area northwest of the parish church, formerly known as the Gravel Pits; and Gore House, which stood on the site of the current Albert Hall, the residence of William Wilberforce, and later of the countess of Blessington.
The parish church of St Mary Abbots, High Street, occupies an ancient site, but was built from the designs of Sir Gilbert Scott in 1869. It is in Decorated style, and has one of the loftiest spires in England. In the north the borough includes the cemetery of Kensal Green (with the exception of the Roman Catholic portion, which is in the borough of Hammersmith); it was opened in 1838, and great numbers of eminent persons are buried here. The Roman Catholic church of Our Lady of Victories lies close to Kensington Road, and in Brompton Road is the Oratory of St Philip Neri, a fine building with richly decorated interior, noted for the beauty of its musical services, as is the Carmelite Church in Church Street. St Charles’s Roman Catholic College (for boys), near the north end of Ladbroke Grove, was founded by Cardinal Manning in 1863; the buildings are now used as a training centre for Catholic school mistresses. Of secular institutions the principal are the museums in South Kensington. The Victoria and Albert, commonly called the South Kensington, Museum contains various exhibits divided into sections, and includes the buildings of the Royal College of Science. Close by is the Natural History Museum, in a great building by Alfred Waterhouse, opened as a branch of the British Museum in 1880. Near this stood Cromwell House, erroneously considered to have been the residence of Oliver Cromwell, the name of which survives in the adjacent Cromwell Road. In Kensington Gardens, near the upper end of Exhibition Road, which separates the two museums, was held the Great Exhibition of 1851, the hall of which is preserved as the Crystal Palace at Sydenham. The greater part of the gardens, however, with the Albert Memorial, erected by Queen Victoria in memory of Albert, prince consort, the Albert Hall, opposite to it, one of the principal concert-halls in London, and the Imperial Institute to the south, are actually within the city of Westminster, though commonly connected with Kensington. The gardens (275 acres) were laid out in the time of Queen Anne, and have always been a popular and fashionable place of recreation. Extensive grounds at Earl’s Court are open from time to time for various exhibitions. Further notable buildings in Kensington are the town-hall and free library in High Street, which is also much frequented for its excellent shops, and the Brompton Consumption Hospital, Fulham Road. In Holland Park Road is the house of Lord Leighton (d. 1896), given to the nation, and open, with its art collection, to the public.
The parish church of St Mary Abbots on High Street sits on an ancient site, but was designed by Sir Gilbert Scott and built in 1869. It features Decorated style architecture and boasts one of the tallest spires in England. To the north, the borough includes Kensal Green Cemetery (except for the Roman Catholic section, which is in the borough of Hammersmith); it opened in 1838 and is the burial place of many notable individuals. The Roman Catholic church of Our Lady of Victories is located near Kensington Road, and on Brompton Road is the Oratory of St Philip Neri, an impressive building with a richly adorned interior, famous for its beautiful musical services, similar to the Carmelite Church on Church Street. St Charles’s Roman Catholic College for boys, near the north end of Ladbroke Grove, was founded by Cardinal Manning in 1863; the buildings are now a training center for Catholic school teachers. The main secular institutions are the museums in South Kensington. The Victoria and Albert Museum, commonly called the South Kensington Museum, features various exhibits organized into sections and includes the Royal College of Science buildings. Nearby is the Natural History Museum, a grand structure designed by Alfred Waterhouse, which became a branch of the British Museum in 1880. Close to this is Cromwell House, mistakenly believed to have been the home of Oliver Cromwell, which lends its name to the nearby Cromwell Road. In Kensington Gardens, near the upper end of Exhibition Road, which separates the two museums, the Great Exhibition of 1851 took place, and its hall is preserved as the Crystal Palace at Sydenham. However, most of the gardens, including the Albert Memorial built by Queen Victoria in memory of Prince Albert, the Albert Hall—one of London’s main concert halls—and the Imperial Institute to the south, are actually located within the city of Westminster, although they are commonly associated with Kensington. The gardens, spanning 275 acres, were landscaped during the time of Queen Anne and have always been a popular and fashionable spot for recreation. Large grounds at Earl’s Court are occasionally opened for various exhibitions. Other notable buildings in Kensington include the town hall and free library on High Street, which is also frequented for its excellent shops, and the Brompton Consumption Hospital on Fulham Road. In Holland Park Road is the house of Lord Leighton (d. 1896), which has been donated to the nation and is open to the public along with its art collection.
Kensington is a suffragan bishopric in the diocese of London. The parliamentary borough of Kensington has north and south divisions, each returning one member. The borough council consists of a mayor, 10 aldermen and 60 councillors. Area, 2291.1 acres.
Kensington is a suffragan bishopric in the diocese of London. The parliamentary borough of Kensington is divided into north and south sections, each electing one member. The borough council includes a mayor, 10 aldermen, and 60 councillors. Area: 2,291.1 acres.

KENT, EARLS AND DUKES OF. The first holder of the English earldom of Kent was probably Odo, bishop of Bayeux, and the second a certain William de Ypres (d. 1162), both of whom were deprived of the dignity. The regent Hubert de Burgh obtained this honour in 1227, and in 1321 it was granted to Edmund Plantagenet, the youngest brother of Edward II. Edmund (1301-1330), who was born at Woodstock on the 5th of August 1301, received many marks of favour from his brother the king, whom he steadily supported until the last act in Edward’s life opened in 1326. He fought in Scotland and then in France, and was a member of the council when Edward III. became king in 1327. Soon at variance with Queen Isabella and her lover, Roger Mortimer, Edmund was involved in a conspiracy to restore Edward II., who he was led to believe was still alive; he was arrested, and beheaded on the 19th of March 1330. Although he had been condemned as a traitor his elder son Edmund (c. 1327-1333) was recognized as earl of Kent, the title passing on his death to his brother John (c. 1330-1352).
KENT, EARLS, AND DUKES. The first person to hold the English earldom of Kent was likely Odo, the Bishop of Bayeux, followed by a man named William de Ypres (d. 1162), both of whom lost their titles. The regent Hubert de Burgh received this honor in 1227, and in 1321 it was awarded to Edmund Plantagenet, the youngest brother of Edward II. Edmund (1301-1330), born at Woodstock on August 5, 1301, received much favor from his brother the king, whom he consistently supported until the final events of Edward’s life unfolded in 1326. He fought in Scotland and then in France, and he was part of the council when Edward III. became king in 1327. Soon at odds with Queen Isabella and her lover, Roger Mortimer, Edmund got involved in a plot to restore Edward II., whom he believed was still alive; he was arrested and executed by beheading on March 19, 1330. Even though he was condemned as a traitor, his elder son Edmund (c. 1327-1333) was recognized as the earl of Kent, and upon his death, the title passed to his brother John (c. 1330-1352).
After John’s childless death the earldom appears to have been held by his sister Joan, “the fair maid of Kent,” and in 1360 Joan’s husband, Sir Thomas de Holand, or Holland, was summoned to parliament as earl of Kent. Holand, who was a soldier of some repute, died in Normandy on the 28th of December 1360, and his widow married Edward the Black Prince, by whom she was the mother of Richard II. The next earl was Holand’s eldest son Thomas (1350-1397), who was marshal of England from 1380 to 1385, and was in high favour with his half-brother, Richard II. The 3rd earl of Kent of the Holand family was his son Thomas (1374-1400). In September 1397, a few months after becoming earl of Kent, Thomas was made duke of Surrey as a reward for assisting Richard II. against the lords appellant; but he was degraded from his dukedom in 1399, and was beheaded in January of the following year for conspiring against Henry IV. However, his brother Edmund (1384-1408) was allowed to succeed to the earldom, which became extinct on his death in Brittany in September 1408.
After John’s death without children, his sister Joan, “the fair maid of Kent,” seemed to have taken over the earldom. In 1360, Joan’s husband, Sir Thomas de Holand, was called to parliament as the earl of Kent. Holand, a well-known soldier, died in Normandy on December 28, 1360, and his widow married Edward the Black Prince, with whom she had Richard II. The next earl was Holand’s eldest son, Thomas (1350-1397), who served as marshal of England from 1380 to 1385 and was favored by his half-brother, Richard II. The third earl of Kent from the Holand family was his son Thomas (1374-1400). In September 1397, shortly after becoming earl of Kent, Thomas was made duke of Surrey for helping Richard II against the lords appellant; however, he lost his dukedom in 1399 and was executed in January of the following year for plotting against Henry IV. His brother Edmund (1384-1408) was allowed to inherit the earldom, which became extinct when he died in Brittany in September 1408.
In the same century the title was revived in favour of William, a younger son of Ralph Neville, 1st earl of Westmorland, and through his mother Joan Beaufort a grandson of John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster. William (c. 1405-1463), who held the barony of Fauconberg in right of his wife, Joan, gained fame during the wars in France and fought for the Yorkists during the Wars of the Roses. His prowess is said to have been chiefly responsible for the victory of Edward IV. at Towton in March 1461, and soon after this event he was created earl of Kent and admiral of England. He died in January 1463, and, as his only legitimate issue were three daughters, the title of earl of Kent again became extinct. Neville’s natural son Thomas, “the bastard of Fauconberg” (d. 1471), was a follower of Warwick, the “Kingmaker.”
In the same century, the title was revived for William, a younger son of Ralph Neville, 1st Earl of Westmorland, and through his mother, Joan Beaufort, he was a grandson of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster. William (c. 1405-1463), who inherited the barony of Fauconberg through his wife, Joan, became renowned during the wars in France and fought for the Yorkists during the Wars of the Roses. His skill in battle is said to have played a major role in Edward IV's victory at Towton in March 1461, and shortly after this event, he was made Earl of Kent and Admiral of England. He died in January 1463, and since his only legitimate heirs were three daughters, the title of Earl of Kent became extinct once again. Neville’s illegitimate son Thomas, known as “the bastard of Fauconberg” (d. 1471), was a supporter of Warwick, the “Kingmaker.”
The long connexion of the family of Grey with this title began in 1465, when Edmund, Lord Grey of Ruthin, was created earl of Kent. Edmund (c. 1420-1489) was the eldest son of Sir John Grey, while his mother, Constance, was a daughter of John Holand, duke of Exeter. During the earlier part of the Wars of the Roses Grey fought for Henry VI.; but by deserting the Lancastrians during the battle of Northampton in 1460 he gave the victory to the Yorkists. He was treasurer of England and held other high offices under Edward IV. and Richard III. His son and successor, George, 2nd earl of Kent (c. 1455-1503), also a soldier, married Anne Woodville, a sister of Edward IV.’s queen, Elizabeth, and was succeeded by his son Richard (1481-1524). After Richard’s death without issue, his half-brother and heir, Henry (c. 1495-1562), did not assume the title of earl of Kent on account of his poverty; but in 1572 Henry’s grandson Reginald (d. 1573), who had been member of parliament for Weymouth, was recognized as earl; he was followed by his brother Henry (1541-1615), and then by another brother, Charles (c. 1545-1623). Charles’s son, Henry, the 8th earl (c. 1583-1639), married Elizabeth (1581-1651), daughter of Gilbert Talbot, 7th earl of Shrewsbury. This lady, who was an authoress, took for her second husband the jurist John Selden. Henry died without children in November 1639, when the earldom of Kent, separated from the barony of Ruthin, passed to his cousin Anthony (1557-1643), a clergyman, who was succeeded by his son Henry (1594-1651), Lord Grey of Ruthin. Henry had been a member of parliament from 1640 to 1643, and as a supporter of the popular party was speaker of the House of Lords until its abolition. The 11th earl was his son Anthony (1645-1702), whose son Henry became 12th earl in August 1702, lord chamberlain of the royal household from 1704 to 1710, and in 1706 was created earl of Harold and marquess of Kent, becoming duke of Kent four years later. All his sons predeceased their father, and when the duke died in June 1740, his titles of earl, marquess and duke of Kent became extinct.
The long connection of the Grey family with this title started in 1465 when Edmund, Lord Grey of Ruthin, was made Earl of Kent. Edmund (c. 1420-1489) was the oldest son of Sir John Grey, and his mother, Constance, was the daughter of John Holand, Duke of Exeter. During the earlier part of the Wars of the Roses, Grey fought for Henry VI; however, by switching sides during the Battle of Northampton in 1460, he helped the Yorkists claim victory. He served as treasurer of England and held other high roles under Edward IV and Richard III. His son and successor, George, 2nd Earl of Kent (c. 1455-1503), who was also a soldier, married Anne Woodville, a sister of Elizabeth, the queen married to Edward IV. George was succeeded by his son Richard (1481-1524). After Richard passed away without children, his half-brother and heir, Henry (c. 1495-1562), didn't take on the title of Earl of Kent due to his financial struggles; however, in 1572, Henry’s grandson Reginald (d. 1573), who had been a member of parliament for Weymouth, was acknowledged as earl. He was succeeded by his brother Henry (1541-1615) and then by another brother, Charles (c. 1545-1623). Charles’s son, Henry, the 8th earl (c. 1583-1639), married Elizabeth (1581-1651), the daughter of Gilbert Talbot, 7th Earl of Shrewsbury. This woman, who was also an author, married the jurist John Selden as her second husband. Henry died childless in November 1639, when the Earldom of Kent, separate from the Barony of Ruthin, went to his cousin Anthony (1557-1643), a clergyman, who was followed by his son Henry (1594-1651), Lord Grey of Ruthin. Henry was a member of parliament from 1640 to 1643, and as a supporter of the popular party, he was the Speaker of the House of Lords until it was abolished. The 11th Earl was his son Anthony (1645-1702), whose son Henry became the 12th Earl in August 1702, serving as Lord Chamberlain of the Royal Household from 1704 to 1710, and in 1706, he was made Earl of Harold and Marquess of Kent, becoming Duke of Kent four years later. All his sons died before him, and when the Duke passed away in June 1740, his titles of Earl, Marquess, and Duke of Kent became extinct.
In 1799 Edward Augustus, fourth son of George III., was created duke of Kent and Strathearn by his father. Born on the 2nd of November 1767, Edward served in the British army in North America and elsewhere, becoming a field marshal in 1805. To quote Sir Spencer Walpole, Kent, a stern disciplinarian, “was unpopular among his troops; and the storm which was created by his well-intentioned effort at Gibraltar to check the licentiousness and drunkenness of the garrison compelled him finally to retire from the governorship of this colony.” Owing to pecuniary difficulties his later years were mainly passed on the continent of Europe. He died at Sidmouth on the 23rd 735 of January 1820. In 1818 the duke married Maria Louisa Victoria (1786-1861), widow of Emich Charles, prince of Leiningen (d. 1814), and sister of Leopold I., king of the Belgians; and his only child was Queen Victoria (q.v.).
In 1799, Edward Augustus, the fourth son of George III, was made Duke of Kent and Strathearn by his father. Born on November 2, 1767, Edward served in the British army in North America and other locations, becoming a field marshal in 1805. As Sir Spencer Walpole noted, Kent, a strict disciplinarian, “was unpopular among his troops; and the uproar caused by his well-meaning attempt at Gibraltar to curb the misconduct and drinking of the garrison ultimately forced him to step down from the governorship of this colony.” Due to financial difficulties, he spent his later years mainly in continental Europe. He died in Sidmouth on January 23, 1820. In 1818, the duke married Maria Louisa Victoria (1786-1861), the widow of Emich Charles, Prince of Leiningen (d. 1814), and sister of Leopold I, King of the Belgians; their only child was Queen Victoria (q.v.).

KENT, JAMES (1763-1847), American jurist, was born at Philippi in New York State on the 31st of July 1763. He graduated at Yale College in 1781, and began to practise law at Poughkeepsie, in 1785 as an attorney, and in 1787 at the bar. In 1791 and 1702-93 Kent was a representative of Dutchess county in the state Assembly. In 1793 he removed to New York, where Governor Jay, to whom the young lawyer’s Federalist sympathies were a strong recommendation, appointed him a master in chancery for the city. He was professor of law in Columbia College in 1793-98 and again served in the Assembly in 1796-97. In 1797 he became recorder of New York, in 1798 judge of the supreme court of the state, in 1804 chief justice, and in 1814 chancellor of New York. In 1822 he became a member of the convention to revise the state constitution. Next year, Chancellor Kent resigned his office and was re-elected to his former chair. Out of the lectures he now delivered grew the Commentaries on American Law (4 vols., 1826-1830), which by their learning, range and lucidity of style won for him a high and permanent place in the estimation of both English and American jurists. Kent rendered most essential service to American jurisprudence while serving as chancellor. Chancery law had been very unpopular during the colonial period, and had received little development, and no decisions had been published. His judgments of this class (see Johnson’s Chancery Reports, 7 vols., 1816-1824) cover a wide range of topics, and are so thoroughly considered and developed as unquestionably to form the basis of American equity jurisprudence. Kent was a man of great purity of character and of singular simplicity and guilelessness. He died in New York on the 12th of December 1847.
KENT, JAMES (1763-1847), American jurist, was born in Philippi, New York, on July 31, 1763. He graduated from Yale College in 1781 and started practicing law in Poughkeepsie as an attorney in 1785 and at the bar in 1787. In 1791 and 1792-93, Kent represented Dutchess County in the state Assembly. In 1793, he moved to New York, where Governor Jay appointed him a master in chancery for the city, appreciating the young lawyer’s Federalist views. He taught law at Columbia College from 1793-98 and served in the Assembly again in 1796-97. In 1797, he became the recorder of New York, in 1798 he was appointed judge of the state supreme court, in 1804 he became chief justice, and in 1814 he was named chancellor of New York. In 1822, he was elected to a convention to revise the state constitution. The following year, Chancellor Kent resigned but was re-elected to his previous position. The lectures he delivered during this time led to the publication of the Commentaries on American Law (4 vols., 1826-1830), which gained him respect for their depth, breadth, and clarity among both English and American jurists. Kent made significant contributions to American legal principles while serving as chancellor. Chancery law had been quite unpopular during the colonial era and had seen little development, with no published decisions. His rulings in this area (see Johnson’s Chancery Reports, 7 vols., 1816-1824) cover a wide variety of topics and are so thoroughly considered that they undoubtedly laid the groundwork for American equity law. Kent was known for his integrity and remarkable simplicity. He passed away in New York on December 12, 1847.
To Kent we owe several other works (including a Commentary on International Law) of less importance than the Commentaries. See J. Duer’s Discourse on the Life, Character and Public Services of James Kent (1848); The National Portrait Gallery of Distinguished Americans, vol. ii. (1852); W. Kent, Memoirs and Letters of Chancellor Kent (Boston, 1898).
To Kent, we owe several other works (including a Commentary on International Law) that are less significant than the Commentaries. See J. Duer’s Discourse on the Life, Character and Public Services of James Kent (1848); The National Portrait Gallery of Distinguished Americans, vol. ii. (1852); W. Kent, Memoirs and Letters of Chancellor Kent (Boston, 1898).

KENT, WILLIAM (1685-1748), English “painter, architect, and the father of modern gardening,” as Horace Walpole in his Anecdotes of Painting describes him, was born in Yorkshire in 1685. Apprenticed to a coach-painter, his ambition soon led him to London, where he began life as a portrait and historical painter. He found patrons, who sent him in 1710 to study in Italy; and at Rome he made other friends, among them Lord Burlington, with whom he returned to England in 1719. Under that nobleman’s roof Kent chiefly resided till his death on the 12th of April 1748—obtaining abundant commissions in all departments of his art, as well as various court appointments which brought him an income of £600 a year. Walpole says that Kent was below mediocrity in painting. He had some little taste and skill in architecture, of which Holkham palace is perhaps the most favourable example. The mediocre statue of Shakespeare in Westminster Abbey sufficiently stamps his powers as a sculptor. His merit in landscape gardening is greater. In Walpole’s language, Kent “was painter enough to taste the charms of landscape, bold and opinionative enough to dare and to dictate, and born with a genius to strike out a great system from the twilight of imperfect essays.” In short, he was the first in English gardening to vindicate the natural against the artificial. Banishing all the clipped monstrosities of the topiary art in yew, box or holly, releasing the streams from the conventional canal and marble basin, and rejecting the mathematical symmetry of ground plan then in vogue for gardens, Kent endeavoured to imitate the variety of nature, with due regard to the principles of light and shade and perspective. Sometimes he carried his imitation too far, as when he planted dead trees in Kensington gardens to give a greater air of truth to the scene, though he himself was one of the first to detect the folly of such an extreme. Kent’s plans were designed rather with a view to immediate effect over a comparatively small area than with regard to any broader or subsequent results.
KENT, WILLIAM (1685-1748), English “painter, architect, and the father of modern gardening,” as Horace Walpole describes him in his Anecdotes of Painting, was born in Yorkshire in 1685. He started as an apprentice to a coach painter, but his ambition quickly took him to London, where he began his career as a portrait and historical painter. He found supporters who sent him to study in Italy in 1710; in Rome, he made more friends, including Lord Burlington, with whom he returned to England in 1719. Kent mainly lived under that nobleman's roof until his death on April 12, 1748, receiving plenty of commissions in all areas of his art, along with various court positions that provided him an income of £600 a year. Walpole mentions that Kent was below average in painting. He had some taste and skill in architecture, with Holkham Palace being perhaps the best example. The mediocre statue of Shakespeare in Westminster Abbey highlights his limitations as a sculptor. However, his talent in landscape gardening is more notable. In Walpole’s words, Kent “was painter enough to appreciate the charms of landscape, bold and opinionated enough to take risks and make demands, and born with a genius to create a significant system from the early stages of imperfect attempts.” In essence, he was the first in English gardening to defend the natural over the artificial. He eliminated all the clipped monstrosities of topiary made from yew, box, or holly, released streams from conventional canals and marble basins, and rejected the mathematical symmetry of garden layouts that were common at the time. Kent aimed to mimic the variety of nature while considering the principles of light, shade, and perspective. Sometimes he took his imitation too far, such as when he planted dead trees in Kensington Gardens to enhance the realism of the scene, although he was one of the first to realize the absurdity of such extremes. Kent's designs were focused more on immediate visual impact over a relatively small area rather than on any broader or longer-term outcomes.

KENT, one of the kingdoms of Anglo-Saxon Britain, the dimensions of which seem to have corresponded with those of the present county (see below). According to tradition it was the first part of the country occupied by the invaders, its founders, Hengest and Horsa, having been employed by the British king Vortigern against the Picts and Scots. Their landing, according to English tradition, took place between 450-455, though in the Welsh accounts the Saxons are said to have arrived in 428 (cf. Hist. Britt. 66). According to The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, which probably used some lost list of Kentish kings, Hengest reigned 455-488, and was succeeded by his son Aesc (Oisc), who reigned till 512; but little value can be attached to these dates. Documentary history begins with Aethelberht, the great-grandson of Aesc, who reigned probably 560-616. He married Berhta, daughter of the Frankish king Haribert, or Charibert, an event which no doubt was partly responsible for the success of the mission of Augustine, who landed in 597. Aethelberht was at this time supreme over all the English kings south of the Humber. On his death in 616 he was succeeded by his son Eadbald, who renounced Christianity and married his stepmother, but was shortly afterwards converted by Laurentius, the successor of Augustine. Eadbald was succeeded in 640 by his son Erconberht, who enforced the acceptance of Christianity throughout his kingdom, and was succeeded in 664 by his son Ecgbert, the latter again by his brother Hlothhere in 673. The early part of Hlothhere’s reign was disturbed by an invasion of Aethelred of Mercia. He issued a code of laws, which is still extant, together with his nephew Eadric, the son of Ecgbert, but in 685 a quarrel broke out between them in which Eadric called in the South Saxons. Hlothhere died of his wounds, and was succeeded by Eadric, who, however, reigned under two years.
KENT, one of the kingdoms of Anglo-Saxon Britain, the size of which seems to match that of the current county (see below). According to tradition, it was the first area of the country settled by the invaders, with its founders, Hengest and Horsa, having been hired by the British king Vortigern to fight against the Picts and Scots. Their arrival, according to English tradition, occurred between 450-455, although Welsh accounts suggest the Saxons arrived in 428 (cf. Hist. Britt. 66). According to The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, which likely relied on some lost record of Kentish kings, Hengest ruled from 455-488 and was succeeded by his son Aesc (Oisc), who ruled until 512; however, these dates are not considered very reliable. Recorded history begins with Aethelberht, the great-grandson of Aesc, who probably reigned from 560-616. He married Berhta, the daughter of the Frankish king Haribert, or Charibert, which likely contributed to the success of Augustine's mission when he arrived in 597. At this time, Aethelberht was the chief ruler over all the English kings south of the Humber. After his death in 616, he was succeeded by his son Eadbald, who rejected Christianity and married his stepmother, but was soon converted by Laurentius, Augustine's successor. Eadbald was succeeded in 640 by his son Erconberht, who promoted Christianity across his kingdom, and then in 664 by his son Ecgbert, followed by his brother Hlothhere in 673. The early part of Hlothhere’s reign was troubled by an invasion from Aethelred of Mercia. He established a set of laws, which still exist today, along with his nephew Eadric, the son of Ecgbert, but in 685 a conflict arose between them, during which Eadric brought in the South Saxons. Hlothhere died from his injuries and was succeeded by Eadric, who, however, ruled for less than two years.
The death of Eadric was followed by a disturbed period, in which Kent was under kings whom Bede calls “dubii vel externi.” An unsuccessful attempt at conquest seems to have been made by the West Saxons, one of whose princes, Mul, brother of Ceadwalla, is said to have been killed in 687. There is some evidence for a successful invasion by the East Saxon king Sigehere during the same year. A king named Oswine, who apparently belonged to the native dynasty, seems to have obtained part of the kingdom in 688. The other part came in 689 into the hands of Swefheard, probably a son of the East Saxon king Sebbe. Wihtred, a son of Ecgbert, succeeded Oswine about 690, and obtained possession of the whole kingdom before 694. From him also we have a code of laws. At Wihtred’s death in 725 the kingdom was divided between his sons Aethelberht, Eadberht and Alric, the last of whom appears to have died soon afterwards. Aethelberht reigned till 762; Eadberht, according to the Chronicle, died in 748, but some doubtful charters speak of him as alive in 761-762. Eadberht was succeeded by his son Eardwulf, and he again by Eanmund, while Aethelberht was succeeded by a king named Sigered. From 764-779 we find a king named Ecgbert, who in the early part of his reign had a colleague named Heaberht. At this period Kentish history is very obscure. Another king named Aethelberht appears in 781, and a king Ealhmund in 784, but there is some reason for suspecting that Offa annexed Kent about this time. On his death (796) Eadberht Praen made himself king, but in 798 he was defeated and captured by Coenwulf, who made his own brother Cuthred king in his place. On Cuthred’s death in 807 Coenwulf seems to have kept Kent in his own possession. His successors Ceolwulf and Beornwulf likewise appear to have held Kent, but in 825 we hear of a king Baldred who was expelled by Ecgbert king of Wessex. Under the West Saxon dynasty Kent, together with Essex, Sussex and Surrey, was sometimes given as a dependent kingdom to one of the royal family. During Ecgbert’s reign it was entrusted to his son Aethelwulf, on whose accession to the throne of Wessex, in 839, it was given to Aethelstan, probably his son, who lived at least till 851. From 855 to 860 it was governed by Aethelberht son of Aethelwulf. During the last years of Alfred’s reign it seems to have been entrusted by him to his son Edward. Throughout the 9th century we hear also of two earls, whose spheres of authority may have corresponded to those of the two 736 kings whom we find in the 8th century. The last earls of whom we have any record were the two brothers Sigehelm and Sigewulf, who fell at the Holm in 905 when the Kentish army was cut off by the Danes, on Edward the Elder’s return from his expedition into East Anglia. At a later period Kent appears to have been held, together with Sussex, by a single earl.
The death of Eadric was followed by a troubled time when Kent was ruled by kings that Bede refers to as “dubii vel externi.” The West Saxons made an unsuccessful conquest attempt, and it’s said that one of their princes, Mul, who was the brother of Ceadwalla, was killed in 687. There’s some evidence that Sigehere, the East Saxon king, successfully invaded that same year. A king named Oswine, likely from the local dynasty, seems to have taken part of the kingdom in 688. The other part came under Swefheard, probably a son of the East Saxon king Sebbe, in 689. Wihtred, the son of Ecgbert, succeeded Oswine around 690 and gained control of the entire kingdom before 694. He also gave us a code of laws. When Wihtred died in 725, the kingdom was split between his sons Aethelberht, Eadberht, and Alric, the last of whom appears to have died shortly after. Aethelberht ruled until 762; Eadberht, according to the Chronicle, died in 748, but some questionable charters suggest he was still alive in 761-762. Eadberht was succeeded by his son Eardwulf, who was then followed by Eanmund, while Aethelberht was succeeded by a king named Sigered. From 764-779, there was a king named Ecgbert, who had a colleague named Heaberht early in his reign. At this point, Kent's history becomes quite unclear. Another king named Aethelberht appears in 781, and a king Ealhmund in 784, but there are reasons to think that Offa annexed Kent around this time. After Offa's death in 796, Eadberht Praen claimed the kingship, but he was defeated and captured by Coenwulf in 798, who then made his brother Cuthred king instead. Upon Cuthred's death in 807, Coenwulf seems to have taken control of Kent himself. His successors, Ceolwulf and Beornwulf, also held Kent, but in 825 we hear about a king named Baldred, who was expelled by Ecgbert, king of Wessex. Under the West Saxon dynasty, Kent, along with Essex, Sussex, and Surrey, was sometimes given as a dependent kingdom to a member of the royal family. During Ecgbert’s reign, it was entrusted to his son Aethelwulf, and when Aethelwulf became king of Wessex in 839, it was given to Aethelstan, likely his son, who lived at least until 851. From 855 to 860, it was governed by Aethelberht, son of Aethelwulf. In the later years of Alfred’s reign, it appears he entrusted it to his son Edward. Throughout the 9th century, we also hear of two earls, whose areas of control may have matched those of the two kings from the 8th century. The last earls we have records of were brothers named Sigehelm and Sigewulf, who died at the Holm in 905 when the Kentish army was defeated by the Danes upon Edward the Elder’s return from his campaign in East Anglia. Later, it seems Kent was held together with Sussex by a single earl.
The internal organization of the kingdom of Kent seems to have been somewhat peculiar. Besides the division into West Kent and East Kent, which probably corresponds with the kingdoms of the 8th century, we find a number of lathes, apparently administrative districts under reeves, attached to royal villages. In East Kent there were four of these, namely, Canterbury, Eastry, Wye and Lymne, which can be traced back to the 9th century or earlier. In the 11th century we hear of two lathes in West Kent, those of Sutton and Aylesford.
The internal structure of the kingdom of Kent seems to have been pretty unique. Besides being divided into West Kent and East Kent, which likely aligns with the kingdoms of the 8th century, there were several lathes, which appear to have been administrative areas managed by reeves, linked to royal villages. In East Kent, there were four of these: Canterbury, Eastry, Wye, and Lymne, which can be traced back to the 9th century or even earlier. By the 11th century, we hear about two lathes in West Kent, those of Sutton and Aylesford.
The social organization of the Kentish nation was wholly different from that of Mercia and Wessex. Instead of two “noble” classes we find only one, called at first eorlcund, later as in Wessex, gesithcund. Again below the ordinary freeman we find three varieties of persons called laetas, probably freedmen, to whom we have nothing analogous in the other kingdoms. Moreover the wergeld of the ceorl, or ordinary freeman, was two or three times as great as that of the same class in Wessex and Mercia, and the same difference of treatment is found in all the compensations and fines relating to them. It is not unlikely that the peculiarities of Kentish custom observable in later times, especially with reference to the tenure of land, are connected with these characteristics. An explanation is probably to be obtained from a statement of Bede—that the settlers in Kent belonged to a different nationality from those who founded the other kingdoms, namely the Jutes (q.v.).
The social structure of the Kentish nation was completely different from that of Mercia and Wessex. Instead of having two "noble" classes, there was only one, initially called eorlcund, and later, like in Wessex, gesithcund. Below the regular freeman, there were three types of individuals called laetas, likely freedmen, which we don’t find in the other kingdoms. Additionally, the wergeld for the ceorl, or ordinary freeman, was two to three times higher than that of the same class in Wessex and Mercia, and this difference in treatment is reflected in all the compensations and fines associated with them. It's quite possible that the unique features of Kentish customs seen later, particularly regarding land tenure, are linked to these traits. An explanation might come from a statement by Bede—that the settlers in Kent were from a different nationality than those who established the other kingdoms, specifically the Jutes (q.v.).
See Bede, Historiae ecclesiasticae, edited by C. Plummer (Oxford, 1896); Two of the Saxon Chronicles, edited by J. Earle and C. Plummer (Oxford, 1892-1899); W. de G. Birch, Cartularium Saxonicum (London, 1885-1889); B. Seebohm, Tribal Custom in Anglo-Saxon Law (London, 1902); H. M. Chadwick, Studies on Anglo-Saxon Institutions (Cambridge, 1905); and T. W. Shore, Origin of the Anglo-Saxon Race (London, 1906).
See Bede, Historiae ecclesiasticae, edited by C. Plummer (Oxford, 1896); Two of the Saxon Chronicles, edited by J. Earle and C. Plummer (Oxford, 1892-1899); W. de G. Birch, Cartularium Saxonicum (London, 1885-1889); B. Seebohm, Tribal Custom in Anglo-Saxon Law (London, 1902); H. M. Chadwick, Studies on Anglo-Saxon Institutions (Cambridge, 1905); and T. W. Shore, Origin of the Anglo-Saxon Race (London, 1906).

KENT, a south-eastern county of England, bounded N. by the Thames estuary, E. and S.E. by the English Channel, S.W. by Sussex, and W. by Surrey. In the north-west the administrative county of London encroaches upon the ancient county of Kent, the area of which is 1554.7 sq. m. The county is roughly triangular in form, London lying at the apex of the western angle, the North Foreland at that of the eastern and Dungeness at that of the southern. The county is divided centrally, from west to east, by the well-marked range of hills known as the North Downs, entering Kent from Surrey. In the west above Westerham these hills exceed 800 ft.; to the east the height is much less, but even in Kent (for in Surrey they are higher) the North Downs form a more striking physical feature than their height would indicate. They are intersected, especially on the north, by many deep valleys, well wooded. At three points such valleys cut completely through the main line of the hills. In the west the Darent, flowing north to the Thames below Dartford, pierces the hills north of Sevenoaks, but its waters are collected chiefly from a subsidiary ridge of the Downs running parallel to the main line and south of it, and known as the Ragstone Ridge, from 600 to 800 ft. in height. The Medway, however, cuts through the entire hill system, rising in the Forest Ridges of Sussex, flowing N.E. and E. past Tonbridge, collecting feeders from south and east (the Teise, Beult and others) near Yalding, and then flowing N.E. and N. through the hills, past Maidstone, joining the Thames at its mouth through a broad estuary. The rich lowlands, between the Downs and the Forest Ridges to the south (which themselves extend into Kent), watered by the upper Medway and its feeders, are called the Vale of Kent, and fall within the district well known under the name of the Weald. The easternmost penetration of the Downs is that effected by the Stour (Great Stour) which rises on their southern face, flows S.E. to Ashford, where it receives the East Stour, then turns N.E. past Wye and Canterbury, to meander through the lowlands representing the former channel which isolated the Isle of Thanet from the mainland. The channel was called the Wantsume, and its extent may be gathered from the position of the village of Fordwich near Canterbury, which had formerly a tidal harbour, and is a member of the Cinque Port of Sandwich. The Little Stour joins the Great Stour in these lowlands from a deep vale among the Downs.
KENT, is a southeastern county in England, bordered to the north by the Thames estuary, to the east and southeast by the English Channel, to the southwest by Sussex, and to the west by Surrey. To the northwest, the administrative county of London encroaches upon the historic county of Kent, which covers an area of 1554.7 square miles. The county has a roughly triangular shape, with London at the apex of the western angle, North Foreland at the eastern apex, and Dungeness at the southern apex. Kent is divided centrally, from west to east, by the prominent range of hills known as the North Downs, which enter Kent from Surrey. In the west, near Westerham, these hills rise above 800 feet; to the east, their height is significantly lower, but even in Kent (they are taller in Surrey), the North Downs present a more striking physical feature than their height might suggest. They are intersected, particularly on the northern side, by many deep, well-wooded valleys. At three points, these valleys cut completely through the main line of the hills. In the west, the Darent River, which flows north to the Thames below Dartford, cuts through the hills north of Sevenoaks, but its waters mainly come from a subsidiary ridge of the Downs, running parallel to the main line and known as the Ragstone Ridge, with elevations between 600 and 800 feet. However, the Medway River cuts across the entire hill system, rising in the Forest Ridges of Sussex, flowing northeast and east past Tonbridge, gathering tributaries from the south and east (the Teise, Beult, and others) near Yalding, and then continuing northeast and north through the hills, past Maidstone, to join the Thames at its mouth through a wide estuary. The fertile lowlands between the Downs and the Forest Ridges to the south (which extend into Kent) are watered by the upper Medway and its tributaries, and are known as the Vale of Kent, part of the district commonly referred to as the Weald. The furthest penetration of the Downs to the east is made by the Stour River (Great Stour), which rises on their southern slope, flows southeast to Ashford, where it meets the East Stour, then turns northeast past Wye and Canterbury, meandering through the lowlands that once formed the channel isolating the Isle of Thanet from the mainland. This channel was called the Wantsume, and its extent can be inferred from the location of the village of Fordwich near Canterbury, which once had a tidal harbor and is part of the Cinque Port of Sandwich. The Little Stour joins the Great Stour in these lowlands from a deep valley among the Downs.
About two-thirds of the boundary line of Kent is formed by tidal water. The estuary of the Thames may be said to stretch from London Bridge to Sheerness in the Isle of Sheppey, which is divided from the mainland by the narrow channel (bridged at Queensbridge) of the Swale. Sheerness lies at the mouth of the Medway, a narrow branch of which cuts off a tongue of land termed the Isle of Grain lying opposite Sheerness. Along the banks of the Thames the coast is generally low and marshy, embankments being in several places necessary to prevent inundation. At a few points, however, as at Gravesend, spurs of the North Downs descend directly upon the shore. In the estuary of the Medway there are a number of low marshy islands, but Sheppey presents to the sea a range of slight cliffs from 80 to 90 ft. in height. The marshes extend along the Swale to Whitstable, whence stretches a low line of clay and sandstone cliffs towards the Isle of Thanet, when they become lofty and grand, extending round the Foreland southward to Pegwell Bay. The coast from Sheppey round to the South Foreland is skirted by numerous flats and sands, the most extensive of which are the Goodwin Sands off Deal. From Pegwell Bay south to a point near Deal the coast is flat, and the drained marshes or levels of the lower Stour extend to the west; but thence the coast rises again into chalk cliffs, the eastward termination of the North Downs, the famous white cliffs which form the nearest point of England to continental Europe, overlooking the Strait of Dover. These cliffs continue round the South Foreland to Folkestone, where they fall away, and are succeeded west of Sandgate by a flat shingly shore. To the south of Hythe this shore borders the wide expanse of Romney Marsh, which, immediately west of Hythe, is overlooked by a line of abrupt hills, but for the rest is divided on the north from the drainage system of the Stour only by a slight uplift. The marsh, drained by many channels, seldom rises over a dozen feet above sea-level. At its south-eastern extremity, and at the extreme south of the county, is the shingly promontory of Dungeness. Within historic times much of this marsh was covered by the sea, and the valley of the river Rother, which forms part of the boundary of Kent with Sussex, entering the sea at Rye harbour, was represented by a tidal estuary for a considerable distance inland.
About two-thirds of the boundary line of Kent is made up of tidal water. The Thames estuary stretches from London Bridge to Sheerness on the Isle of Sheppey, which is separated from the mainland by the narrow channel (bridged at Queensbridge) of the Swale. Sheerness is located at the mouth of the Medway, where a narrow branch cuts off a piece of land called the Isle of Grain, situated opposite Sheerness. Along the Thames banks, the coast is generally low and marshy, with embankments necessary in several areas to prevent flooding. However, at a few places such as Gravesend, spurs of the North Downs drop directly to the shore. The Medway estuary has several low, marshy islands, but Sheppey has a slight cliff range that rises 80 to 90 ft. high facing the sea. The marshes extend along the Swale to Whitstable, where a low line of clay and sandstone cliffs stretches toward the Isle of Thanet, becoming high and impressive as they continue round the Foreland south to Pegwell Bay. The coast from Sheppey to South Foreland is lined with many flats and sands, the most extensive being the Goodwin Sands off Deal. From Pegwell Bay south to a point near Deal, the coast is flat, with drained marshes or levels of the lower Stour extending west; but after that, the coast rises again into chalk cliffs, marking the eastern end of the North Downs, the famous white cliffs that are the nearest point of England to mainland Europe, overlooking the Strait of Dover. These cliffs continue around South Foreland to Folkestone, where they taper off, giving way to a flat, shingle shore west of Sandgate. South of Hythe, this shore borders the vast expanse of Romney Marsh, which is overlooked by a line of steep hills just west of Hythe, but for the rest, it's separated from the drainage system of the Stour by only a slight elevation. The marsh, drained by many channels, rarely rises more than a dozen feet above sea level. At its southeastern tip, at the very south of the county, is the shingle promontory of Dungeness. In historical times, much of this marsh was underwater, and the valley of the river Rother, which forms part of the boundary between Kent and Sussex, entering the sea at Rye harbour, was represented by a tidal estuary extending quite far inland.
Geology.—The northern part of the county lies on the southern rim of the London basin; here the beds are dipping northwards. The southern part of the county is occupied by a portion of the Wealden anticline. The London Clay occupies the tongue of land between the estuaries of the Thames and Medway, as well as Sheppey and a district about 8 m. wide stretching southwards from Whitstable to Canterbury, and extending eastwards to the Isle of Thanet. It reappears at Pegwell Bay, and in the neighbourhood of London it rises above the plastic clay into the elevation of Shooter’s Hill, with a height of about 450 ft. and a number of smaller eminences. The thickness of the formation near London is about 400 ft., and at Sheppey it reaches 480 ft. At Sheppey it is rich in various kinds of fossil fish and shells. The plastic clay, which rests chiefly on chalk, occupies the remainder of the estuary of the Thames, but at several places it is broken through by outcrops of chalk, which in some instances run northwards to the banks of the river. The Lower Tertiaries are represented by three different formations known as the Thanet beds, the Woolwich and Reading beds, and the Oldhaven and Blackheath beds. The Thanet beds resting on chalk form a narrow outcrop rising into cliffs at Pegwell Bay and Reculver, and consist (1) of a constant base bed of clayey greenish sand, seldom more than 5 ft. in thickness; (2) of a thin and local bed composed of alternations of brown clay and loam; (3) of a bed of fine light buff sand, which in west Kent attains a thickness of more than 60 ft.; (4) of bluish grey sandy marl containing fossils, and almost entirely confined to east Kent, the thickness of the formation being more than 60 ft.; and (5) of fine light grey sand of an equal thickness, also fossiliferous. The middle series of the Lower Tertiaries, known as the Woolwich and Reading beds, rests either on the Thanet beds or on chalk, and consists chiefly of irregular alternations of clay and sand of very various colours, the former often containing estuarine and oyster shells and the latter flint pebbles. The thickness of the formation varies from 15 to 80 ft., but most commonly it is from 25 to 40 ft. The highest and most local series of the Lower Tertiaries is the Oldhaven and Blackheath beds lying between the London Clay and the Woolwich beds. They consist chiefly of flint pebbles or of light-coloured quartzose sand, the thickness being from 20 to 30 ft, and, are best seen at Oldhaven and Blackheath. To the south the London 737 basin is succeeded by the North Downs, an elevated ridge of country consisting of an outcrop of chalk which extends from Westerham to Folkestone with an irregular breadth generally of 3 to 6 miles, but expanding to nearly 12 miles at Dartford and Gravesend and also to the north of Folkestone. After dipping below the London Clay at Canterbury, it sends out an outcrop which forms the greater part of Thanet. Below the chalk is a thin crop of Upper Greensand between Otford and Westerham. To the south of the Downs there is a narrow valley formed by the Gault, a fossiliferous blue clay. This is succeeded by an outcrop of the Lower Greensand—including the Folkestone, Sandgate and Hythe beds with the thin Atherfield Clay at the base—which extends across the country from west to east with a breadth of from 2 to 7 m., and rises into the picturesque elevations of the Ragstone hills. The remains of Iguanodon occur in the Hythe beds. The valley, which extends from the borders of Sussex to Hythe, is occupied chiefly by the Weald clays, which contain a considerable number of marine and freshwater fossils. Along the borders of Sussex there is a narrow strip of country consisting of picturesque sandy hills, formed by the Hastings beds, whose highest elevation is nearly 400 ft. and the south-west corner of the county is occupied by Romney Marsh, which within a comparatively recent period has been recovered from the sea. Valley gravels border the Thames, and Pleistocene mammalia have been found in fissures in the Hythe beds at Ightham, where ancient stone implements are common. Remains of crag deposits lie in pipes in the chalk near Lenham. Coal-measures, as will be seen, have been found near Dover.
Geology.—The northern part of the county sits on the southern edge of the London basin, where the layers are tilting northward. The southern section of the county includes part of the Wealden anticline. The London Clay covers the area between the Thames and Medway estuaries, Sheppey, and a region about 8 miles wide that stretches south from Whitstable to Canterbury and east to the Isle of Thanet. It reappears at Pegwell Bay, and near London, it rises above the plastic clay into Shooter’s Hill, which is about 450 ft high, along with several smaller hills. The formation's thickness near London is about 400 ft, while at Sheppey it reaches 480 ft. At Sheppey, it's abundant in various fossil fish and shells. The plastic clay, which mainly rests on chalk, covers the rest of the Thames estuary; however, in several locations, it is interrupted by chalk outcrops that sometimes extend northward to the riverbanks. The Lower Tertiaries consist of three formations known as the Thanet beds, the Woolwich and Reading beds, and the Oldhaven and Blackheath beds. The Thanet beds sit on chalk and form a narrow outcrop that leads to cliffs at Pegwell Bay and Reculver, and include (1) a consistent base layer of clayey greenish sand, usually no more than 5 ft thick; (2) a thin and local layer of alternating brown clay and loam; (3) a layer of fine light buff sand, which in west Kent can reach over 60 ft; (4) bluish grey sandy marl containing fossils, mostly found in east Kent, with a thickness of over 60 ft; and (5) fine light grey sand of similar thickness, also containing fossils. The middle series of the Lower Tertiaries, known as the Woolwich and Reading beds, rests on either the Thanet beds or chalk, consisting mainly of irregular layers of clay and sand in various colors, with the clay often containing estuarine and oyster shells and the sand containing flint pebbles. The thickness of this formation ranges from 15 to 80 ft, but it’s most commonly between 25 and 40 ft. The highest and most local series of the Lower Tertiaries is the Oldhaven and Blackheath beds, located between the London Clay and the Woolwich beds. They mainly consist of flint pebbles or light-colored quartz sand, with a thickness of 20 to 30 ft, best viewed at Oldhaven and Blackheath. To the south, the London 737 basin is followed by the North Downs, a raised ridge that consists of chalk outcrops extending from Westerham to Folkestone with an irregular width generally ranging from 3 to 6 miles, widening to nearly 12 miles at Dartford and Gravesend, and also north of Folkestone. After dipping below the London Clay at Canterbury, it sends out a ridge that forms most of Thanet. Below the chalk, there’s a thin layer of Upper Greensand between Otford and Westerham. South of the Downs, there is a narrow valley formed by Gault, a fossil-rich blue clay. This is followed by an outcrop of Lower Greensand, which includes the Folkestone, Sandgate, and Hythe beds, along with the thin Atherfield Clay at the bottom—stretching across the country from west to east with a width of 2 to 7 miles, rising into the scenic Ragstone hills. Remains of Iguanodon are found in the Hythe beds. The valley, which extends from the Sussex border to Hythe, is predominantly filled with Weald clays that contain a significant number of marine and freshwater fossils. Along the Sussex border, there's a narrow area of picturesque sandy hills made up of Hastings beds, with the highest point reaching nearly 400 ft, while the south-west corner of the county is covered by Romney Marsh, which has been reclaimed from the sea in relatively recent times. Valley gravels line the Thames, and Pleistocene mammals have been discovered in fissures of the Hythe beds at Ightham, where ancient stone tools are common. Crag deposits are found in pipes within the chalk near Lenham. Coal measures, as will be noted, have been located near Dover.
The London Clay is much used for bricks, coarse pottery and Roman cement. Lime is obtained from the Chalk and Greensand formations. Ironstone is found in the Wadhurst Clay, a subdivision of the Hastings beds, clays and calcareous ironstone in the Ashdown sand, but the industry has long been discontinued. The last Wealden furnace was put out in 1828.
The London Clay is widely used for bricks, coarse pottery, and Roman cement. Lime is sourced from the Chalk and Greensand formations. Ironstone is located in the Wadhurst Clay, a part of the Hastings beds, along with clays and calcareous ironstone in the Ashdown sand, but this industry has been out of operation for a long time. The last Wealden furnace was shut down in 1828.
Climate and Agriculture.—The unhealthiness of certain portions of the county caused by the marshes is practically removed by draining. In the north-eastern districts the climate is somewhat uncertain, and damage is often done to early fruit-blossoms and vegetation by cold easterly winds and late frosts. In the large portion of the county sheltered by the Downs the climate is milder and more equable, and vegetation is somewhat earlier. The average temperature for January is 37.9° F. at Canterbury, and 39.8° at Dover; for July 63.3° and 61.6° respectively, and the mean annual 50° and 50.2° respectively. Rainfall is light, the mean annual being 27.72 in. at Dover, and 23.31 at Margate, compared with 23.16 at Greenwich. The soil is varied in character, but on the whole rich and under high cultivation. The methods of culture and the kinds of crop produced are perhaps more widely diversified than those of any other county in England. Upon the London Clay the land is generally heavy and stiff, but very fruitful when properly manured and cultivated. The marsh lands along the banks of the Thames, Medway, Stour and Swale consist chiefly of rich chalk alluvium. In the Isle of Thanet a light mould predominates, which has been much enriched by fish manure. The valley of the Medway, especially the district round Maidstone, is the most fertile part of the county, the soil being a deep loam with a subsoil of brick-earth. On the ragstone the soil is occasionally thin and much mixed with small portions of sand and stone; but in some situations the ragstone has a thick covering of clay loam, which is most suitable for the production of hops and fruits. In the district of the Weald marl prevails, with a substratum of clay. The soil of Romney Marsh is a clay alluvium.
Climate and Agriculture.—The health issues in certain areas of the county caused by the marshes are largely resolved by drainage. In the northeastern parts, the climate can be unpredictable, and cold easterly winds along with late frosts can harm early fruit blooms and plants. In the larger section of the county sheltered by the Downs, the climate is milder and more stable, with vegetation appearing slightly earlier. The average temperature in January is 37.9° F. in Canterbury and 39.8° in Dover; for July, it’s 63.3° and 61.6° respectively, with a mean annual temperature of 50° and 50.2° respectively. Rainfall is light, with the average annual amount being 27.72 inches at Dover and 23.31 inches at Margate, compared to 23.16 inches at Greenwich. The soil varies in character but is generally rich and highly cultivated. The farming methods and types of crops grown are probably more diverse than in any other county in England. On the London Clay, the land tends to be heavy and tough, but it's very productive when properly fertilized and farmed. The marshy areas along the banks of the Thames, Medway, Stour, and Swale mainly consist of rich chalk alluvium. In the Isle of Thanet, a light soil type dominates, which has been significantly enriched by fish fertilizer. The valley of the Medway, especially the area around Maidstone, is the most fertile in the county, with deep loamy soil and a subsoil of brick-earth. On ragstone, the soil can sometimes be thin and mixed with sand and small stones, but in some places, the ragstone is covered by a thick layer of clay loam, which is ideal for growing hops and fruits. In the Weald district, marl is common, with a clay base. Romney Marsh has a clay alluvium soil.
No part of England surpasses the more fertile portions of this county in the peculiar richness of its rural scenery. About three-quarters of the total area is under cultivation. Oats and wheat are grown in almost equal quantities, barley being of rather less importance. A considerable acreage is under beans, and in Thanet mustard, spinach, canary seed and a variety of other seeds are raised. But the county is specially noted for the cultivation of fruit and hops. Market gardens are very numerous in the neighbourhood of London. The principal orchard districts are the valleys of the Darent and Medway, and the tertiary soils overlying the chalk, between Rochester and Canterbury. The county is specially famed for cherries and filberts, but apples, pears, plums, gooseberries, strawberries, raspberries and currants are also largely cultivated. In some cases apples, cherries, filberts and hops are grown in alternate rows. The principal hop districts are the country between Canterbury and Faversham, the valley of the Medway in mid Kent, and the district of the Weald. Much of the Weald, which originally was occupied by a forest, is still densely wooded, and woods are specially extensive in the valley of the Medway. Fine oaks and beeches are numerous, and yew trees of great size and age are seen in some Kentish churchyards, as at Stansted, while the fine oak at Headcorn is also famous. A large extent of woodland consists of ash and chestnut plantations, maintained for the growth of hop poles. Cattle are grazed in considerable numbers on the marsh lands, and dairy farms are numerous in the neighbourhood of London. For the rearing of sheep Kent is one of the chief counties in England. A breed peculiar to the district, known as Kents, is grazed on Romney Marsh, but Southdowns are the principal breed raised on the uplands. Bee-keeping is extensively practised. Dairy schools are maintained by the technical education committee of the county council. The South-eastern Agricultural College at Wye is under the control of the county councils of Kent and Surrey.
No part of England exceeds the more fertile areas of this county in the unique richness of its rural landscape. About three-quarters of the total area is used for farming. Oats and wheat are grown in almost equal amounts, while barley is somewhat less significant. A substantial area is dedicated to beans, and in Thanet, mustard, spinach, canary seed, and various other seeds are cultivated. However, the county is particularly known for its fruit and hop production. There are many market gardens near London. The main orchard areas are the valleys of the Darent and Medway, and the tertiary soils over chalk between Rochester and Canterbury. The county is especially famous for cherries and hazelnuts, but apples, pears, plums, gooseberries, strawberries, raspberries, and currants are also widely grown. In some cases, apples, cherries, hazelnuts, and hops are planted in alternating rows. The main hop-growing regions are the area between Canterbury and Faversham, the Medway valley in mid Kent, and the Weald region. Much of the Weald, originally a forest, still has dense woods, especially in the Medway valley. There are many fine oaks and beeches, and large, ancient yew trees are found in some Kentish churchyards, like in Stansted, while the notable oak in Headcorn is also well-known. A large portion of woodland consists of ash and chestnut plantations, which are grown for hop poles. Cattle graze in significant numbers on the marshlands, and there are many dairy farms near London. Kent is one of the leading counties in England for sheep farming. A local breed called Kents is raised on Romney Marsh, but Southdowns are the main breed found in the uplands. Beekeeping is widely practiced. Dairy schools are run by the technical education committee of the county council. The South-eastern Agricultural College at Wye is managed by the county councils of Kent and Surrey.
Other Industries.—There were formerly extensive iron-works in the Weald. Another industry now practically extinct was the manufacture of woollen cloth. The neighbourhood of Lamberhurst and Cranbrook was the special seat of these trades. Among the principal modern industries are paper-making, carried on on the banks of the Darent, Medway, Cray and neighbouring streams; engineering, chemical and other works along the Thames; manufactures of bricks, tiles, pottery and cement, especially by the lower Medway and the Swale. A variety of industries is connected with the Government establishments at Chatham and Sheerness. Ship-building is prosecuted here and at Gravesend, Dover and other ports. Gunpowder is manufactured near Erith and Faversham and elsewhere.
Other Industries.—There used to be large ironworks in the Weald. Another industry that has nearly vanished is the production of woollen cloth. The areas around Lamberhurst and Cranbrook were the main centers for these trades. Some of the main modern industries include paper-making along the banks of the Darent, Medway, Cray, and nearby streams; engineering, chemical, and other operations along the Thames; and the production of bricks, tiles, pottery, and cement, especially near the lower Medway and the Swale. A variety of industries are linked to the government facilities at Chatham and Sheerness. Shipbuilding occurs here as well as in Gravesend, Dover, and other ports. Gunpowder is manufactured near Erith, Faversham, and other locations.
Deep-sea fishing is largely prosecuted all round the coast. Shrimps, soles and flounders are taken in great numbers in the estuaries of the Thames and Medway, along the north coast and off Ramsgate. The history of the Kentish oyster fisheries goes back to the time of the Roman occupation, when the fame of the oyster beds off Rutupiae (Richborough) extended even to Rome. The principal beds are near Whitstable, Faversham, Milton, Queenborough and Rochester, some being worked by ancient companies or gilds of fishermen.
Deep-sea fishing is mainly done all along the coast. Shrimp, sole, and flounder are caught in large quantities in the estuaries of the Thames and Medway, along the northern coast, and off Ramsgate. The history of the Kent oyster fisheries dates back to the Roman occupation, when the reputation of the oyster beds near Rutupiae (Richborough) even reached Rome. The main beds are located near Whitstable, Faversham, Milton, Queenborough, and Rochester, with some still operated by ancient companies or guilds of fishermen.
After the cessation in 1882 of works in connexion with the Channel tunnel, to connect England and France, coal-boring was attempted in the disused shaft, west of the Shakespeare Cliff railway tunnel near Dover. In 1890 coal was struck at a depth of 1190 ft., and further seams were discovered later. The company which took up the mining was unsuccessful, and boring ceased in 1901, but the work was resumed by the Consolidated Kent Collieries Corporation, and an extension of borings revealed in 1905 the probability of a successful development of the mining industry in Kent.
After work on the Channel tunnel to connect England and France stopped in 1882, coal-boring was tried in the unused shaft west of the Shakespeare Cliff railway tunnel near Dover. In 1890, coal was found at a depth of 1,190 feet, and more seams were discovered later. The company that took on the mining was unsuccessful, and boring stopped in 1901. However, the work continued under the Consolidated Kent Collieries Corporation, and an extension of the borings in 1905 showed a promising chance for a successful development of the mining industry in Kent.
Communications.—Railway communications are practically monopolized by the South Eastern & Chatham Company, a monopoly which has not infrequently been the cause of complaint on the part of farmers, traders and others. This system includes some of the principal channels of communication with the continent, through the ports of Dover, Folkestone and Queenborough. The county contains four of the Cinque Ports, namely, Dover, Hythe, New Romney and Sandwich. Seaside resorts are numerous and populous—on the north coast are Minster (Sheppey), Whitstable and Herne Bay; there is a ring of watering-places round the Isle of Thanet—Birchington, Westgate, Margate, Broadstairs, Ramsgate; while to the south are Sandwich, Deal, Walmer, St Margaret’s-at-Cliffe, Dover, Folkestone, Sandgate and Hythe. Tunbridge Wells is a favourite inland watering-place. The influence of London in converting villages into outer residential suburbs is to be observed at many points, whether seaside, along the Thames or inland. The county is practically without inland water communications, excluding the Thames. The Royal military canal which runs along the inland border of Romney Marsh, and connects the Rother with Hythe, was constructed in 1807 as part of a scheme of defence in connexion with the martello towers or small forts along the coast.
Communications.—Railway communications are pretty much dominated by the South Eastern & Chatham Company, which has often led to complaints from farmers, traders, and others. This system includes some of the main routes to the continent, through the ports of Dover, Folkestone, and Queenborough. The county has four of the Cinque Ports: Dover, Hythe, New Romney, and Sandwich. There are many busy seaside resorts—on the north coast, you’ll find Minster (Sheppey), Whitstable, and Herne Bay; around the Isle of Thanet, there’s a ring of beach towns—Birchington, Westgate, Margate, Broadstairs, Ramsgate; while to the south, there are Sandwich, Deal, Walmer, St Margaret’s-at-Cliffe, Dover, Folkestone, Sandgate, and Hythe. Tunbridge Wells is a popular inland resort. The impact of London is evident in how it turns villages into suburban neighborhoods, whether along the coast, the Thames, or inland. The county has almost no inland water communications, except for the Thames. The Royal military canal, which runs along the inland border of Romney Marsh and connects the Rother with Hythe, was built in 1807 as part of a defense plan related to the martello towers or small forts along the coast.
Population and Administration.—The area of the ancient county is 995,014 acres, with a population in 1901 of 1,348,841. In 1801 the population was 308,667. Excluding the portion which falls within the administrative county of London the area is 974,950 acres, with a population in 1891 of 807,269 and in 1901 of 935,855. The area of the administrative county is 976,881 acres. The county contains 5 lathes, a partition peculiar to the county. The municipal boroughs are Bromley (pop. 27,354), Canterbury, a city and county borough (24,889), Chatham (37,057), Deal (10,581), Dover (41,794), Faversham (11,290), Folkestone (30,650), Gillingham (42,530), Gravesend (27,196), Hythe (5557), Lydd (2675), Maidstone (33,516), Margate (23,118), New Romney (1328), Queenborough (1544), Ramsgate (27,733), Rochester, a city (30,590), Sandwich (3170), Tenterden (3243), Tunbridge Wells (33,373). The urban districts are Ashford (12,808), Beckenham (26,331), Bexley (12,918), Broadstairs and St Peter’s (6466), Cheriton (7091), Chislehurst (7429), Dartford (18,644), Erith (25,296), Foots Cray (5817), Herne Bay (6726), Milton (7086), Northfleet (12,906), Penge (22,465), Sandgate (2294), Sevenoaks (8106), Sheerness (18,179), Sittingbourne (8943), Southborough (6977), Tonbridge (12,736), Walmer (5614), Whitstable (7086), Wrotham (3571). Other small towns are Rainham (3693) near Chatham, Aylesford (2678), East Mailing (2391) and West Mailing (2312) in the Maidstone district; Edenbridge (2546) and Westerham (2905) on the western border of the county; Cranbrook (3949), Goudhurst (2725) and Hawkhurst (3136) in the south-west. Among villages which have grown into residential towns through their 738 proximity to London, beyond those included among the boroughs and urban districts, there should be mentioned Orpington (4259). The county is in the south-eastern circuit, and assizes are held at Maidstone. It has two courts of quarter sessions, and is divided into 17 petty sessional divisions. The boroughs having separate commissions of the peace and courts of quarter sessions are Canterbury, Deal, Dover, Faversham, Folkestone, Gravesend, Hythe, Maidstone, Margate, Rochester, Sandwich and Tenterden; while those of Lydd, New Romney, Ramsgate and Tunbridge Wells have separate commissions of the peace. The liberty of Romney Marsh has petty and general sessions. The justices of the Cinque Ports exercise certain jurisdiction, the non-corporate members of the Cinque Ports of Dover and Sandwich having separate commissions of the peace and courts of quarter sessions. The central criminal court has jurisdiction over certain parishes adjacent to London. All those civil parishes within the county of Kent of which any part is within twelve miles of, or of which no part is more than fifteen miles from, Charing Cross are within the metropolitan police district. The total number of civil parishes is 427. Kent is mainly in the diocese of Canterbury, but has parts in those of Rochester, Southwark and Chichester. It contains 476 ecclesiastical parishes or districts, wholly or in part. The county (extra-metropolitan) is divided into 8 parliamentary divisions, namely, North-western or Dartford, Western or Sevenoaks, South-western or Tunbridge, Mid or Medway, North-eastern or Faversham, Southern or Ashford, Eastern or St Augustine’s and the Isle of Thanet, each returning one member; while the boroughs of Canterbury, Chatham, Dover, Gravesend, Hythe, Maidstone and Rochester each return one member.
Population and Administration.—The area of the ancient county is 995,014 acres, with a population in 1901 of 1,348,841. In 1801, the population was 308,667. Excluding the portion within the administrative county of London, the area is 974,950 acres, with a population of 807,269 in 1891 and 935,855 in 1901. The area of the administrative county is 976,881 acres. The county contains 5 lathes, a division unique to the county. The municipal boroughs are Bromley (pop. 27,354), Canterbury, a city and county borough (24,889), Chatham (37,057), Deal (10,581), Dover (41,794), Faversham (11,290), Folkestone (30,650), Gillingham (42,530), Gravesend (27,196), Hythe (5,557), Lydd (2,675), Maidstone (33,516), Margate (23,118), New Romney (1,328), Queenborough (1,544), Ramsgate (27,733), Rochester, a city (30,590), Sandwich (3,170), Tenterden (3,243), Tunbridge Wells (33,373). The urban districts are Ashford (12,808), Beckenham (26,331), Bexley (12,918), Broadstairs and St Peter’s (6,466), Cheriton (7,091), Chislehurst (7,429), Dartford (18,644), Erith (25,296), Foots Cray (5,817), Herne Bay (6,726), Milton (7,086), Northfleet (12,906), Penge (22,465), Sandgate (2,294), Sevenoaks (8,106), Sheerness (18,179), Sittingbourne (8,943), Southborough (6,977), Tonbridge (12,736), Walmer (5,614), Whitstable (7,086), Wrotham (3,571). Other small towns are Rainham (3,693) near Chatham, Aylesford (2,678), East Mailing (2,391), and West Mailing (2,312) in the Maidstone district; Edenbridge (2,546) and Westerham (2,905) on the western border of the county; Cranbrook (3,949), Goudhurst (2,725), and Hawkhurst (3,136) in the southwest. Among villages that have turned into residential towns due to their proximity to London, beyond those included among the boroughs and urban districts, Orpington (4,259) should be noted. The county is in the south-eastern circuit, and court sessions are held at Maidstone. It has two courts of quarter sessions and is divided into 17 petty sessional divisions. The boroughs with separate commissions of the peace and courts of quarter sessions are Canterbury, Deal, Dover, Faversham, Folkestone, Gravesend, Hythe, Maidstone, Margate, Rochester, Sandwich, and Tenterden; while Lydd, New Romney, Ramsgate, and Tunbridge Wells have separate commissions of the peace. The liberty of Romney Marsh holds petty and general sessions. The justices of the Cinque Ports have certain jurisdiction, with the non-corporate members of the Cinque Ports of Dover and Sandwich having separate commissions of the peace and courts of quarter sessions. The central criminal court has jurisdiction over certain parishes near London. All civil parishes within Kent that are within twelve miles of, or no more than fifteen miles from, Charing Cross are within the metropolitan police district. The total number of civil parishes is 427. Kent mainly falls under the diocese of Canterbury but also includes parts of the dioceses of Rochester, Southwark, and Chichester. It contains 476 ecclesiastical parishes or districts, either wholly or partially. The county (extra-metropolitan) is divided into 8 parliamentary divisions: North-western or Dartford, Western or Sevenoaks, South-western or Tunbridge, Mid or Medway, North-eastern or Faversham, Southern or Ashford, Eastern or St Augustine's, and the Isle of Thanet, each returning one member; while the boroughs of Canterbury, Chatham, Dover, Gravesend, Hythe, Maidstone, and Rochester each return one member.
History.—For the ancient kingdom of Kent see the preceding article. The shire organization of Kent dates from the time of Aethelstan, the name as well as the boundary being that of the ancient kingdom, though at first probably with the addition of the suffix “shire,” the form “Kentshire” occurring in a record of the folkmoot at this date. The inland shire-boundary has varied with the altered course of the Rother. In 1888 the county was diminished by the formation of the county of London.
History.—For information on the ancient kingdom of Kent, see the previous article. The shire organization of Kent dates back to the time of Aethelstan, with its name and boundaries reflecting those of the ancient kingdom, although it likely first included the suffix “shire,” as the form “Kentshire” appears in a record from the folkmoot during that period. The inland shire boundary has changed along with the changing course of the Rother River. In 1888, the county was reduced when the county of London was created.
At the time of the Domesday Survey Kent comprised sixty hundreds, and there was a further division into six lests, probably representing the shires of the ancient kingdom, of which two, Sutton and Aylesford, correspond with the present-day lathes. The remaining four, Borowast Lest, Estre Lest, Limowast Lest and Wiwart Lest, existed at least as early as the 9th century, and were apparently named from their administrative centres, Burgwara (the burg being Canterbury), Eastre, Lymne and Wye, all of which were meeting places of the Kentish Council. The five modern lathes (Aylesford, St Augustine, Scray, Sheppey and Sutton-at-Hone) all existed in the time of Edward I., with the additional lathe of Hedeling, which was absorbed before the next reign in that of St Augustine. The Nomina Villarum of the reign of Edward II. mentions all the sixty-six modern hundreds, more than two-thirds of which were at that date in the hands of the church.
At the time of the Domesday Survey, Kent was made up of sixty hundreds, which were further divided into six lests, likely representing the shires of the ancient kingdom. Two of these, Sutton and Aylesford, match today's lathes. The other four, Borowast Lest, Estre Lest, Limowast Lest, and Wiwart Lest, have been around at least since the 9th century and were likely named after their administrative centers: Burgwara (with the burg being Canterbury), Eastre, Lymne, and Wye, all of which served as meeting places for the Kentish Council. The five modern lathes (Aylesford, St Augustine, Scray, Sheppey, and Sutton-at-Hone) were all present during the time of Edward I, along with an additional lathe of Hedeling, which was merged before the next reign into that of St Augustine. The Nomina Villarum from the reign of Edward II states all sixty-six modern hundreds, more than two-thirds of which were at that time owned by the church.
Sheriffs of Kent are mentioned in the time of Æthelred II., and in Saxon times the shiremoot met three times a year on Penenden Heath near Maidstone. After the Conquest the great ecclesiastical landholders claimed exemption from the jurisdiction of the shire, and in 1279 the abbot of Battle claimed to have his own coroner in the hundred of Wye. In the 13th century twelve liberties in Kent claimed to have separate bailiffs. The assizes for the county were held in the reign of Henry III. at Canterbury and Rochester, and also at the Lowey of Tonbridge under a mandate from the Crown as a distinct liberty; afterwards at different intervals at East Greenwich, Dartford, Maidstone, Milton-next-Gravesend and Sevenoaks; from the Restoration to the present day they have been held at Maidstone. The liberty of Romney Marsh has petty and quarter sessions under its charters.
Sheriffs of Kent were mentioned during the time of Æthelred II, and in Saxon times, the shiremoot gathered three times a year on Penenden Heath near Maidstone. After the Conquest, the major ecclesiastical landowners claimed to be exempt from the shire's jurisdiction, and in 1279, the abbot of Battle claimed the right to have his own coroner in the hundred of Wye. In the 13th century, twelve liberties in Kent claimed to have their own bailiffs. The county's assizes were held during the reign of Henry III at Canterbury and Rochester, as well as at the Lowey of Tonbridge under a mandate from the Crown, as a distinct liberty. Later, they were held at various intervals in East Greenwich, Dartford, Maidstone, Milton-next-Gravesend, and Sevenoaks; from the Restoration to today, they have been held at Maidstone. The liberty of Romney Marsh has petty and quarter sessions according to its charters.
Kent is remarkable as the only English county which comprises two entire bishoprics, Canterbury, the see for East Kent, having been founded in 597, and Rochester, the see for West Kent, in 600. In 1291 the archdeaconry of Canterbury was co-extensive with that diocese and included the deaneries of Westbere, Bridge, Sandwich, Dover, Elham, Lympne, Charing, Sutton, Sittingbourne, Ospringe and Canterbury; the archdeaconry of Rochester, also co-extensive with its diocese, included the deaneries of Rochester, Dartford, Malling and Shoreham. In 1845 the deaneries of Charing, Sittingbourne and Sutton were comprised in the new archdeaconry of Maidstone, which in 1846 received in addition the deaneries of Dartford, Malling and Shoreham from the archdeaconry of Rochester. In 1853 the deaneries of Malling and Charing were subdivided into North and South Malling and East and West Charing. Lympne was subdivided into North and South Lympne in 1857 and Dartford into East and West Dartford in 1864. Gravesend and Cobham deaneries were created in 1862 and Greenwich and Woolwich in 1868, all in the archdeaconry of Rochester. In 1873 East and West Bridge deaneries were created in the archdeaconry of Canterbury, and Croydon in the archdeaconry of Maidstone. In 1889 Tunbridge deanery was created in the archdeaconry of Maidstone. In 1906 the deaneries of East and West Dartford, North and South Malling, Greenwich and Woolwich were abolished, and Shoreham and Tunbridge were transferred from Maidstone to Rochester archdeaconry.
Kent is unique as the only English county that has two complete bishoprics: Canterbury, which serves East Kent and was established in 597, and Rochester, which serves West Kent and was founded in 600. In 1291, the archdeaconry of Canterbury covered the same area as the diocese and included the deaneries of Westbere, Bridge, Sandwich, Dover, Elham, Lympne, Charing, Sutton, Sittingbourne, Ospringe, and Canterbury. The archdeaconry of Rochester, also covering its diocese, included the deaneries of Rochester, Dartford, Malling, and Shoreham. In 1845, the deaneries of Charing, Sittingbourne, and Sutton became part of the new archdeaconry of Maidstone, which in 1846 also added the deaneries of Dartford, Malling, and Shoreham from the archdeaconry of Rochester. In 1853, the deaneries of Malling and Charing were divided into North and South Malling and East and West Charing. Lympne was split into North and South Lympne in 1857, and Dartford was divided into East and West Dartford in 1864. The deaneries of Gravesend and Cobham were established in 1862, followed by Greenwich and Woolwich in 1868, all within the archdeaconry of Rochester. In 1873, the East and West Bridge deaneries were created in the archdeaconry of Canterbury, along with Croydon in the archdeaconry of Maidstone. Tunbridge deanery was formed in 1889 within the archdeaconry of Maidstone. In 1906, the deaneries of East and West Dartford, North and South Malling, Greenwich, and Woolwich were eliminated, and Shoreham and Tunbridge were transferred from Maidstone to the Rochester archdeaconry.
Between the Conquest and the 14th century the earldom of Kent was held successively by Odo, bishop of Bayeux, William of Ypres and Hubert de Burgh (sheriff of the county in the reign of Henry III.), none of whom, however, transmitted the honour, which was bestowed by Edward I. on his youngest son Edmund of Woodstock, and subsequently passed to the families of Holland and Neville (see Kent, Earls and Dukes of). In the Domesday Survey only five lay tenants-in-chief are mentioned, all the chief estates being held by the church, and the fact that the Kentish gentry are less ancient than in some remoter shires is further explained by the constant implantation of new stocks from London. Greenwich is illustrious as the birthplace of Henry VIII., Mary and Elizabeth. Sir Philip Sidney was born at Penshurst, being descended from William de Sidney, chamberlain to Henry II. Bocton Malherbe was the seat of the Wottons, from whom descended Nicholas Wotton, privy councillor to Henry VIII., Edward VI., Mary and Elizabeth. The family of Leiborne of Leiborne Castle, of whom Sir Roger Leiborne took an active part in the barons’ wars, became extinct in the 14th century. Sir Francis Walsingham was born at Chislehurst, where his family had long flourished; Hever Castle was the seat of the Boleyns and the scene of the courtship of Anne Boleyn by Henry VIII. Allington Castle was the birthplace of Sir Thomas Wyat.
Between the Conquest and the 14th century, the earldom of Kent was held successively by Odo, the bishop of Bayeux, William of Ypres, and Hubert de Burgh (sheriff of the county during Henry III’s reign), none of whom passed on the title. It was granted by Edward I to his youngest son, Edmund of Woodstock, and later went to the families of Holland and Neville (see Kent, Earls and Dukes of). The Domesday Survey mentions only five lay tenants-in-chief, with the main estates being owned by the church. The fact that the Kentish gentry is less ancient than in some more distant counties is further explained by the constant influx of new families from London. Greenwich is famous as the birthplace of Henry VIII, Mary, and Elizabeth. Sir Philip Sidney was born in Penshurst, descending from William de Sidney, chamberlain to Henry II. Bocton Malherbe was the residence of the Wottons, from whom Nicholas Wotton, privy councillor to Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary, and Elizabeth, descended. The family of Leiborne from Leiborne Castle, of whom Sir Roger Leiborne actively participated in the barons’ wars, became extinct in the 14th century. Sir Francis Walsingham was born in Chislehurst, where his family had long thrived; Hever Castle was the home of the Boleyns and the site of Anne Boleyn’s courtship by Henry VIII. Allington Castle was the birthplace of Sir Thomas Wyatt.
Kent, from its proximity to London, has been intimately concerned in every great historical movement which has agitated the country, while its busy industrial population has steadily resisted any infringement of its rights and liberties. The chief events connected with the county under the Norman kings were the capture of Rochester by William Rufus during the rebellion of Odo of Bayeux; the capture of Dover and Leeds castles by Stephen; the murder of Thomas à Becket at Canterbury in 1170; the submission of John to the pope’s legate at Dover in 1213, and the capture of Rochester Castle by the king in the same year. Rochester Castle was in 1216 captured by the dauphin of France, to whom nearly all Kent submitted, and during the wars of Henry III. with his barons was captured by Gilbert de Clare. In the peasants’ rising of 1381 the rebels plundered the archbishop’s palace at Canterbury, and 100,000 Kentishmen gathered round Wat Tyler of Essex. In 1450 Kent took a leading part in Jack Cade’s rebellion; and in 1554 the insurrection of Sir Thomas Wyat began at Maidstone. On the outbreak of the Great Rebellion feeling was much divided, but after capturing Dover Castle the parliament soon subdued the whole county. In 1648, however, a widespread insurrection was organized on behalf of Charles, and was suppressed by Fairfax. The county was among the first to welcome back Charles II. In 1667 the Dutch fleet under De Ruyter advanced up the Medway, levelling the fort at Sheerness and burning the ships at Chatham. In 739 the Kentish petition of 1701 drawn up at Maidstone the county protested against the peace policy of the Tory party.
Kent, due to its closeness to London, has been closely involved in every major historical event that has affected the country, while its active industrial population has consistently fought against any violations of its rights and freedoms. The main events related to the county under the Norman kings include William Rufus capturing Rochester during Odo of Bayeux's rebellion; Stephen taking Dover and Leeds castles; the assassination of Thomas à Becket in Canterbury in 1170; King John's submission to the pope’s legate at Dover in 1213, and the king capturing Rochester Castle that same year. In 1216, Rochester Castle was taken by the dauphin of France, to whom nearly all of Kent submitted, and during the wars of Henry III with his barons, it was seized by Gilbert de Clare. During the peasants’ revolt of 1381, the rebels raided the archbishop’s palace in Canterbury, and 100,000 Kentishmen rallied around Wat Tyler from Essex. In 1450, Kent played a major role in Jack Cade’s rebellion, and in 1554, the uprising of Sir Thomas Wyat began in Maidstone. When the Great Rebellion broke out, sentiments were deeply divided, but after the capture of Dover Castle, Parliament quickly brought the entire county under control. In 1648, however, a widespread uprising in support of Charles was organized and ultimately suppressed by Fairfax. The county was one of the first to welcome Charles II back. In 1667, the Dutch fleet under De Ruyter advanced up the Medway, destroying the fort at Sheerness and burning the ships at Chatham. In the Kentish petition of 1701 drafted in Maidstone, the county protested against the peace policy of the Tory party.
Among the earliest industries of Kent were the iron-mining in the Weald, traceable at least to Roman times, and the salt industry, which nourished along the coast in the 10th century. The Domesday Survey, besides testifying to the agricultural activity of the country, mentions over one hundred salt-works and numerous valuable fisheries, vines at Chart Sutton and Leeds, and cheese at Milton. The Hundred Rolls of the reign of Edward I. frequently refer to wool, and Flemish weavers settled in the Weald in the time of Edward III. Tiles were manufactured at Wye in the 14th century. Valuable timber was afforded by the vast forest of the Weald, but the restrictions imposed on the felling of wood for fuel did serious detriment to the iron-trade, and after the statute of 1558 forbidding the felling of timber for iron-smelting within fourteen miles of the coast the industry steadily declined. The discovery of coal in the northern counties dealt the final blow to its prosperity. Cherries are said to have been imported from Flanders and first planted in Kent by Henry VIII., and from this period the culture of fruits (especially apples and cherries) and of hops spread rapidly over the county. Thread-making at Maidstone and silk-weaving at Canterbury existed in the 16th century, and before 1590 one of the first paper-mills in England was set up at Dartford. The statute of 1630 forbidding the exportation of wool, followed by the Plague of 1665, led to a serious trade depression, while the former enactment resulted in the vast smuggling trade which spread along the coast, 40,000 packs of wool being smuggled to Calais from Kent and Sussex in two years.
Among the earliest industries in Kent were iron mining in the Weald, which can be traced back to Roman times, and the salt industry, which thrived along the coast in the 10th century. The Domesday Survey, besides showing the agricultural activities of the region, mentions over one hundred salt works and many valuable fisheries, as well as vineyards at Chart Sutton and Leeds, and cheese production at Milton. The Hundred Rolls from the reign of Edward I frequently talk about wool, and Flemish weavers settled in the Weald during the time of Edward III. Tiles were made at Wye in the 14th century. The extensive forest of the Weald provided valuable timber, but restrictions on cutting wood for fuel severely harmed the iron industry. After the statute of 1558 forbidding the felling of timber for iron smelting within fourteen miles of the coast, the industry gradually declined. The discovery of coal in the northern counties dealt a final blow to its prosperity. Cherries are said to have been brought in from Flanders and first planted in Kent by Henry VIII., and from that time, the cultivation of fruits (especially apples and cherries) and hops spread quickly throughout the county. Thread-making in Maidstone and silk-weaving in Canterbury existed in the 16th century, and before 1590, one of the first paper mills in England was established at Dartford. The statute of 1630 banning the export of wool, combined with the Plague of 1665, led to a significant trade depression, while the earlier law resulted in a massive smuggling trade along the coast, with 40,000 packs of wool smuggled to Calais from Kent and Sussex in just two years.
In 1290 Kent returned two members to parliament for the county, and in 1295 Canterbury, Rochester and Tunbridge were also represented; Tunbridge however made no returns after this date. In 1552 Maidstone acquired representation, and in 1572 Queenborough. Under the act of 1832 the county returned four members in two divisions, Chatham was represented by one member and Greenwich by two, while Queenborough was disfranchised. Under the act of 1868 the county returned six members in three divisions and Gravesend returned one member. By the act of 1885 the county returned eight members in eight divisions, and the representation of Canterbury, Maidstone and Rochester was reduced to one member each. By the London Government Act of 1892 the borough of Greenwich was taken out of Kent and made one of the twenty-eight metropolitan boroughs of the county of London.
In 1290, Kent sent two representatives to parliament for the county, and in 1295, Canterbury, Rochester, and Tunbridge were also represented; however, Tunbridge stopped sending representatives after this date. In 1552, Maidstone gained representation, and in 1572, so did Queenborough. Under the 1832 act, the county sent four members in two divisions, Chatham was represented by one member, and Greenwich had two members, while Queenborough lost its representation. The 1868 act increased the county's representation to six members in three divisions, with Gravesend returning one member. The 1885 act upped the county's representation to eight members in eight divisions, reducing Canterbury, Maidstone, and Rochester to one member each. The London Government Act of 1892 removed the borough of Greenwich from Kent, making it one of the twenty-eight metropolitan boroughs of the county of London.
Antiquities.—As was to be expected from its connexion with the early history of England, and from its beauty and fertility, Kent possessed a larger than average number of monastic foundations. The earliest were the priory of Christ’s Church and the abbey of St Peter and St Paul, now called St Augustine’s, both at Canterbury, founded by Augustine and the monks who accompanied him to England. Other Saxon foundations were the nunneries at Folkestone (630), Lyminge (633; nunnery and monastery), Reculver (669), Minster-in-Thanet (670), Minster-in-Sheppey (675), and the priory of St Martin at Dover (696), all belonging to the Benedictine order. Some of these were refounded, and the principal monastic remains now existing are those of the Benedictine priories at Rochester (1089), Folkestone (1095), Dover (1140); the Benedictine nunneries at Malling (time of William Rufus), Minster-in-Sheppey (1130), Higham (founded by King Stephen), and Davington (1153); the Cistercian Abbey at Boxley (1146); the Cluniac abbey at Faversham (1147) and priory at Monks Horton (time of Henry II.), the preceptory of Knights Templars at Swingfield (time of Henry II.); the Premonstratensian abbey of St Radigund’s, near Dover (1191); the first house of Dominicans in England at Canterbury (1221); the first Carmelite house in England, at Aylesford (1240); and the priory of Augustinian nuns at Dartford (1355). Other houses of which there are slight remains are Lesnes abbey, near Erith, and Bilsington priory near Ashford, established in 1178 and 1253 respectively, and both belonging to the Augustinian canons; and the house of Franciscans at Canterbury (1225). But no remains exist of the priories of Augustinian canons at Canterbury (St Gregory’s; 1084), Leeds, near Maidstone (1119), Tunbridge (middle of 12th century), Combwell, near Cranbrook (time of Henry II.); the nunnery of St Sepulchre at Canterbury (about 1100) and Langdon abbey, near Walmer (1192), both belonging to the Benedictines; the Trinitarian priory of Mottenden near Headcorn, the first house of Crutched Friars in England (1224), where miracle plays were presented in the church by the friars on Trinity Sunday; the Carmelite priories at Sandwich (1272) and Losenham near Tenterden (1241); and the preceptory of Knights of St John of Jerusalem at West Peckham, near Tunbridge (1408).
Antiquities.—As expected due to its connection with the early history of England, along with its beauty and fertile land, Kent had more than its fair share of monastic foundations. The earliest were the priory of Christ’s Church and the abbey of St. Peter and St. Paul, now known as St Augustine’s, both located in Canterbury, founded by Augustine and the monks who came with him to England. Other Saxon establishments included the nunneries at Folkestone (630), Lyminge (633; both nunnery and monastery), Reculver (669), Minster-in-Thanet (670), Minster-in-Sheppey (675), and the priory of St. Martin at Dover (696), all part of the Benedictine order. Some of these were refounded, and the main monastic remains still existing today are those of the Benedictine priories at Rochester (1089), Folkestone (1095), Dover (1140); the Benedictine nunneries at Malling (during the time of William Rufus), Minster-in-Sheppey (1130), Higham (founded by King Stephen), and Davington (1153); the Cistercian Abbey at Boxley (1146); the Cluniac abbey at Faversham (1147) and priory at Monks Horton (during the time of Henry II.); the preceptory of the Knights Templar at Swingfield (during the time of Henry II.); the Premonstratensian abbey of St Radigund’s, near Dover (1191); the first house of Dominicans in England at Canterbury (1221); the first Carmelite house in England at Aylesford (1240); and the priory of Augustinian nuns at Dartford (1355). Other houses with limited remains are Lesnes Abbey, near Erith, and Bilsington Priory near Ashford, established in 1178 and 1253 respectively, both belonging to the Augustinian canons; and the house of Franciscans at Canterbury (1225). However, no remains exist of the priories of Augustinian canons at Canterbury (St. Gregory’s; 1084), Leeds, near Maidstone (1119), Tunbridge (mid-12th century), Combwell, near Cranbrook (during the time of Henry II.); the nunnery of St. Sepulchre at Canterbury (around 1100) and Langdon Abbey, near Walmer (1192), both belonging to the Benedictines; the Trinitarian priory of Mottenden near Headcorn, the first house of Crutched Friars in England (1224), where miracle plays were performed in the church by the friars on Trinity Sunday; the Carmelite priories at Sandwich (1272) and Losenham near Tenterden (1241); and the preceptory of the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem at West Peckham, near Tunbridge (1408).
Even apart from the cathedral churches of Canterbury and Rochester, the county is unsurpassed in the number of churches it possesses of the highest interest. For remains of a date before the Conquest the church of Lyminge is of first importance. Here, apart from the monastic remains, there may be seen portions of the church founded by Æthelburga, wife of Edwin, king of Northumberland, and rebuilt, with considerable use of Roman material, in 965 by St Dunstan. There is similar early work in the church of Paddlesworth, not far distant. Among numerous Norman examples the first in interest is the small church at Barfreston, one of the most perfect specimens of its kind in England, with a profusion of ornament, especially round the south doorway and east window. The churches of St Margaret-at-Cliff, Patrixbourne and Darenth are hardly less noteworthy, while the tower of New Romney church should also be mentioned. Among several remarkable Early English examples none is finer than Hythe church, but the churches of SS. Mary and Eanswith, Folkestone, Minster-in-Thanet, Chalk, with its curious porch, Faversham and Westwell, with fine contemporary glass, are also worthy of notice. Stone church, near Dartford, a late example of this style, transitional to Decorated, is very fine; and among Decorated buildings Chartham church exhibits in some of its windows the peculiar tracery known as Kentish Decorated. Perpendicular churches, though numerous, are less remarkable, but the fine glass of this period in Nettlestead church may be noticed. The church of Cobham contains one of the richest collections of ancient brasses in England.
Even without the cathedral churches of Canterbury and Rochester, the county has an incredible number of churches that are highly interesting. The church of Lyminge is especially significant, with remains dating before the Conquest. Besides the monastic remains, you can see parts of the church founded by Æthelburga, who was the wife of Edwin, the king of Northumberland, and rebuilt in 965 by St. Dunstan using a lot of Roman material. There is also early work in the church of Paddlesworth, located not too far away. Among the many Norman examples, the small church at Barfreston stands out as one of the most perfect of its kind in England, featuring a wealth of decoration, especially around the south doorway and east window. The churches of St. Margaret-at-Cliff, Patrixbourne, and Darenth are also quite notable, while the tower of New Romney church deserves a mention too. Among the several impressive Early English examples, Hythe church is particularly fine, but the churches of Sts. Mary and Eanswith in Folkestone, Minster-in-Thanet, Chalk with its unique porch, Faversham, and Westwell with their stunning contemporary glass are also worth acknowledging. Stone church near Dartford, a later example of this style transitioning to Decorated, is very nice; and among the Decorated buildings, Chartham church showcases some peculiar tracery known as Kentish Decorated in some of its windows. Though there are many Perpendicular churches, they are less remarkable, but the exquisite glass from this period in Nettlestead church is worth noting. The church of Cobham has one of the richest collections of ancient brasses in England.
Kent is also rich in examples of ancient architecture other than ecclesiastical. The castles of Rochester and Dover are famous; those of Canterbury and Chilham are notable among others. Ancient mansions are very numerous; among these are the castellated Leeds Castle in the Maidstone district, Penshurst Place, Hever Castle near Edenbridge, Saltwood and Westenhanger near Hythe, the Mote House at Ightham near Wrotham, Knole House near Sevenoaks, and Cobham Hall. Minor examples of early domestic architecture abound throughout the county.
Kent is also full of examples of ancient architecture beyond just churches. The castles of Rochester and Dover are well-known, while those of Canterbury and Chilham stand out among others. There are many ancient mansions, including the castle-like Leeds Castle in the Maidstone area, Penshurst Place, Hever Castle near Edenbridge, Saltwood and Westenhanger close to Hythe, the Mote House at Ightham near Wrotham, Knole House near Sevenoaks, and Cobham Hall. There are plenty of smaller examples of early domestic architecture spread throughout the county.
Authorities.—A full bibliography of the many earlier works on the county and its towns is given in J. R. Smith’s Bibliotheca Cantiana (London, 1837). There may be mentioned here W. Lambarde, Perambulation of Kent (London, 1576, 1826); R. Kilburne, Topographie or Survey of the County of Kent (London, 1659); J. and T. Philipot, Villare Cantianum (London, 1659, 1776); J. Harris, History of Kent (London, 1719); E. Hasted, History and Topographical Survey of Kent (4 vols. folio, Canterbury, 1778-1799; 2nd ed., 12 vols. 8vo, Canterbury, 1797-1801); W. H. Ireland, History of the County of Kent (London, 1828-1830); C. Sandys, Consuetudines Kantiae (London, 1851); A. Hussey, Notes on the Churches of Kent (London, 1852); L. B. Larking, The Domesday Book of Kent (1869); R. Furley, History of the Weald of Kent (Ashford, 1871-1874); W. A. Scott Robertson, Kentish Archaeology (London, 1876-1884); Sir S. R. Glynne, Notes on Churches of Kent, ed. W. H. Gladstone (London, 1877); J. Hutchinson, Men of Kent and Kentish Men (London, 1892); Victoria County History, “Kent.” See also Archaeologia Cantiana (translations of the Kent Archaeological Society, London, from 1858).
Authorities.—A complete bibliography of the numerous earlier works on the county and its towns can be found in J. R. Smith’s Bibliotheca Cantiana (London, 1837). Notable mentions include W. Lambarde, Perambulation of Kent (London, 1576, 1826); R. Kilburne, Topographie or Survey of the County of Kent (London, 1659); J. and T. Philipot, Villare Cantianum (London, 1659, 1776); J. Harris, History of Kent (London, 1719); E. Hasted, History and Topographical Survey of Kent (4 vols. folio, Canterbury, 1778-1799; 2nd ed., 12 vols. 8vo, Canterbury, 1797-1801); W. H. Ireland, History of the County of Kent (London, 1828-1830); C. Sandys, Consuetudines Kantiae (London, 1851); A. Hussey, Notes on the Churches of Kent (London, 1852); L. B. Larking, The Domesday Book of Kent (1869); R. Furley, History of the Weald of Kent (Ashford, 1871-1874); W. A. Scott Robertson, Kentish Archaeology (London, 1876-1884); Sir S. R. Glynne, Notes on Churches of Kent, ed. W. H. Gladstone (London, 1877); J. Hutchinson, Men of Kent and Kentish Men (London, 1892); Victoria County History, “Kent.” See also Archaeologia Cantiana (translations of the Kent Archaeological Society, London, from 1858).

KENTIGERN, ST, or Mungo (“dear friend,” a name given to him, according to Jocelyn, by St Servanus), a Briton of Strathclyde, called by the Goidels In Glaschu, “the Grey Hound,” was, according to the legends preserved in the lives which remain, of royal descent. His mother when with child was thrown down from a hill called Dunpelder (Traprain Law, Haddingtonshire), but survived the fall and escaped by sea to Culross on the farther side of the Firth of Forth, where Kentigern was born. It is possible that she may have been a nun, as a convent had been founded in earlier times on Traprain Law. The life then describes the training of the boy by Servanus, but the date of the latter renders this impossible. Returning to Strathclyde Kentigern lived for some time at Glasgow, near a cemetery ascribed to St Ninian, and was eventually made bishop of that region by the king and clergy. This story is partially attested by Welsh documents, in which Kentigern appears as the bishop of Garthmwl, apparently the ruler of the region about Glasgow. Subsequently he was opposed by a pagan king called Morken, whose relatives after his death succeeded in forcing the saint to retire from Strathclyde. He thereupon took refuge with St David at Menevia (St David’s), and eventually founded a monastery at Llanelwy (St Asaph’s), for which purpose he received grants from Maelgwn, prince of Gwynedd. After the battle of Ardderyd in 573 in which King Rhydderch, leader of the Christian party in Strathclyde, was victorious, Kentigern was recalled. He fixed his see first at Hoddam in Dumfriesshire, but afterwards 740 returned to Glasgow. He is credited with missionary work in Galloway and north of the Firth of Forth, but most of the dedications to him which survive are north of the Mounth in the upper valley of the Dee. The meeting of Kentigern and Columba probably took place soon after 584, when the latter began to preach in the neighbourhood of the Tay.
KENTIGERN, ST, or Mungo (“dear friend,” a name given to him, according to Jocelyn, by St Servanus), a Briton from Strathclyde, known by the Goidels as In Glaschu, “the Grey Hound,” was, according to the legends preserved in the remaining stories, of royal lineage. His mother, while pregnant, was thrown from a hill called Dunpelder (Traprain Law, Haddingtonshire), but survived the fall and escaped by sea to Culross on the other side of the Firth of Forth, where Kentigern was born. It's possible she might have been a nun, as a convent had been established earlier on Traprain Law. The narrative then describes how the boy was trained by Servanus, but the timeline makes this unlikely. Returning to Strathclyde, Kentigern lived for a while in Glasgow, near a cemetery attributed to St Ninian, and was eventually appointed bishop of the area by the king and clergy. This story is partially supported by Welsh documents, in which Kentigern is mentioned as the bishop of Garthmwl, presumably the leader of the region around Glasgow. Later, he faced opposition from a pagan king named Morken, whose family, after Morken's death, forced the saint to leave Strathclyde. He then sought refuge with St David at Menevia (St David’s) and eventually established a monastery at Llanelwy (St Asaph’s), for which he received land grants from Maelgwn, prince of Gwynedd. After the battle of Ardderyd in 573, where King Rhydderch, leader of the Christian faction in Strathclyde, emerged victorious, Kentigern was recalled. He initially set his see at Hoddam in Dumfriesshire, but later 740 returned to Glasgow. He is recognized for his missionary work in Galloway and north of the Firth of Forth, but most of the surviving dedications to him are located north of the Mounth in the upper valley of the Dee. The meeting between Kentigern and Columba likely occurred shortly after 584, when Columba began preaching in the Tay area.
Authorities.—Lives of St Kentigern; Fragment used by John of Fordun, and complete “Life” by Jocelyn of Furness in Forbes’s Historians of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1874), vol. v.; Four Ancient Books of Wales (Edinburgh, ed. W. F. Skene, 1868), ii. 457; Myvyrian Archaeology (London, 1801), ii. 34; D. R. Thomas, History of Diocese of St Asaph (London, 1874), p. 5; Index of Llyfr Coch Asaph, Archaeologia Cambrensis, 3rd series, 1868, vol. xiv. p. 151; W. F. Skene, Celtic Scotland (Edinburgh, 1877), ii. 179 ff.; John Rhys, Celtic Britain (London, 1904), pp. 145, 146, 174, 199, 250.
Authorities.—Lives of St Kentigern; Fragment used by John of Fordun, and complete "Life" by Jocelyn of Furness in Forbes’s Historians of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1874), vol. v.; Four Ancient Books of Wales (Edinburgh, ed. W. F. Skene, 1868), ii. 457; Myvyrian Archaeology (London, 1801), ii. 34; D. R. Thomas, History of Diocese of St Asaph (London, 1874), p. 5; Index of Llyfr Coch Asaph, Archaeologia Cambrensis, 3rd series, 1868, vol. xiv. p. 151; W. F. Skene, Celtic Scotland (Edinburgh, 1877), ii. 179 ff.; John Rhys, Celtic Britain (London, 1904), pp. 145, 146, 174, 199, 250.

KENTON, a city and the county seat of Hardin county, Ohio, U.S.A., on the Scioto river, 60 m. N.W. of Columbus. Pop. (1900), 6852, including 493 foreign-born and 271 negroes; (1910), 7185. It is served by the Erie, the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St Louis, and the Ohio Central railways. It is built on the water-parting between Lake Erie and the Gulf of Mexico, here about 1,000 ft. above sea-level. There are shops of the Ohio Central railway here, and manufactories of hardware. The municipality owns and operates its waterworks. Kenton was named in honour of Simon Kenton (1755-1836), a famous scout and Indian fighter, who took part in the border warfare, particularly in Kentucky and Ohio, during the War of American Independence and afterwards. It was platted and became the county seat in 1833, and was chartered as a city in 1885.
KENTON, is a city and the county seat of Hardin County, Ohio, U.S.A., located on the Scioto River, 60 miles northwest of Columbus. Population (1900) was 6,852, including 493 foreign-born residents and 271 Black individuals; (1910) it grew to 7,185. The city is served by the Erie, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis, and Ohio Central railways. It's situated on the water-parting between Lake Erie and the Gulf of Mexico, at about 1,000 feet above sea level. There are shops for the Ohio Central Railway and factories that produce hardware. The city owns and operates its waterworks. Kenton was named after Simon Kenton (1755-1836), a well-known scout and Indian fighter who was involved in border warfare, especially in Kentucky and Ohio, during and after the American Revolutionary War. It was laid out and became the county seat in 1833, and was incorporated as a city in 1885.

KENT’S CAVERN, or Kent’s Hole, the largest of English bone caves, famous as affording evidence of the existence of Man in Devon (England) contemporaneously with animals now extinct or no longer indigenous. It is about a mile east of Torquay harbour and is of a sinuous nature, running deeply into a hill of Devonian limestone. Although long known locally, it was not until 1825 that it was scientifically examined by Rev. J. McEnery, who found worked flints in intimate association with the bones of extinct mammals. He recognized the fact that they proved the existence of man in Devonshire while those animals were alive, but the idea was too novel to be accepted by his contemporaries. His discoveries were afterwards verified by Godwin Austen, and ultimately by the Committee of the British Association, whose explorations were carried on under the guidance of Wm. Pengelly from 1865 to 1880. There are four distinct strata in the cave. (1) The surface is composed of dark earth and contains medieval remains, Roman pottery and articles which prove that it was in use during the Iron, Bronze and Neolithic Ages. (2) Below this is a stalagmite floor, varying in thickness from 1 to 3 ft., and covering (3) the red earth which contained bones of the hyaena, lion, mammoth, rhinoceros and other animals, in association with flint implements and an engraved antler, which proved man to have been an inhabitant of the cavern during its deposition. Above this and below the stalagmite there is in one part of the cave a black band from 2 to 6 in. thick, formed of soil like No. 2, containing charcoal, numerous flint implements, and the bones and teeth of animals, the latter occasionally perforated as if used for ornament. (4) Filling the bottom of the cave was a hard breccia, with the remains of bears and flint implements, the latter in the main ruder than those found above; in some places it was no less than 12 ft. thick. The most remarkable animal remains found in Kent’s Cavern are those of the Sabre-toothed tiger, Machairodus latidens of Sir Richard Owen. While the value of McEnery’s discoveries was in dispute the exploration of the cave of Brixham near Torquay in 1858 proved that man was coeval with the extinct mammalia, and in the following year additional proof was offered by the implements that were found in Wookey Hole, Somerset. Similar remains have been met with in the caves of Wales, and in England as far north as Derbyshire (Cresswell), proving that over the whole of southern and middle England men, in precisely the same stage of rude civilization, hunted the rhinoceros, the mammoth and other extinct animals.
KENT’S CAVERN, or Kent's Cave, is the largest bone cave in England, known for providing evidence that humans existed in Devon (England) at the same time as now-extinct or no longer native animals. Located about a mile east of Torquay harbor, it is a winding cave that runs deep into a hill made of Devonian limestone. Although it was locally known for a long time, it wasn’t until 1825 that Rev. J. McEnery conducted a scientific examination and discovered worked flints along with the bones of extinct mammals. He recognized that these findings indicated that humans lived in Devonshire while those animals were still alive, but his ideas were too revolutionary for his peers to accept. His discoveries were later confirmed by Godwin Austen and ultimately validated by the Committee of the British Association, whose investigations took place under the direction of Wm. Pengelly from 1865 to 1880. The cave contains four distinct layers. (1) The upper layer consists of dark soil containing medieval remains, Roman pottery, and artifacts that show it was used during the Iron, Bronze, and Neolithic Ages. (2) Beneath this is a stalagmite floor, ranging from 1 to 3 feet thick, which sits above (3) a red earth layer that held bones from hyaenas, lions, mammoths, rhinoceroses, and other animals, along with flint tools and an engraved antler, indicating that humans inhabited the cave during that time. Above this, and below the stalagmite layer, there is a section of the cave with a black band 2 to 6 inches thick, consisting of soil like that in layer No. 2, containing charcoal, many flint tools, and animal bones and teeth, some of which have holes drilled in them, suggesting they were used as ornaments. (4) The cave bottom is filled with hard breccia, containing bear remains and flint tools, the latter being generally more primitive than those higher up; in some areas, this layer is as thick as 12 feet. The most notable animal remains found in Kent’s Cavern belong to the Sabre-toothed tiger, Machairodus latidens of Sir Richard Owen. While the significance of McEnery’s discoveries was debated, the exploration of Brixham cave near Torquay in 1858 confirmed that humans coexisted with extinct mammals, and the following year, more evidence came from tools found in Wookey Hole, Somerset. Similar remains have also been found in caves across Wales and as far north as Derbyshire (Cresswell), demonstrating that people throughout southern and central England, at the same level of early civilization, hunted rhinoceroses, mammoths, and other extinct animals.
See Sir John Evans, Ancient Stone Implements of Great Britain (London, 1897); Lord Avebury’s Prehistoric Times (1900); W. Pengelly, Address to the British Association (1883) and Life of him by his daughter (1897); Godwin Austen, Proc. Geo. Soc. London, 111. 286; Pengelly, “Literature of Kent’s Cavern” in Trans. Devonshire Association (1868); William Boyd Dawkins, Cave-hunting and Early Man in Britain.
See Sir John Evans, Ancient Stone Implements of Great Britain (London, 1897); Lord Avebury’s Prehistoric Times (1900); W. Pengelly, Address to the British Association (1883) and his biography by his daughter (1897); Godwin Austen, Proc. Geo. Soc. London, 111. 286; Pengelly, “Literature of Kent’s Cavern” in Trans. Devonshire Association (1868); William Boyd Dawkins, Cave-hunting and Early Man in Britain.

KENTUCKY, a South Central State of the United States of America, situated between 36° 30′ and 39° 6′ N., and 82° and 89° 38′ W. It is bounded N., N.W., and N.E. by Illinois, Indiana and Ohio; E. by the Big Sandy river and its E. fork, the Tug, which separates it from West Virginia, and by Virginia; S.E. and S. by Virginia and Tennessee; and W. by the Mississippi river, which separates it from Missouri. It has an area of 40,598 sq. m.; of this, 417 sq. m., including the entire breadth of the Ohio river, over which it has jurisdiction, are water surface.
KENTUCKY, is a state in South Central America, located between 36° 30′ and 39° 6′ N., and 82° and 89° 38′ W. It is bordered to the north, northwest, and northeast by Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio; to the east by the Big Sandy River and its eastern fork, the Tug, which separates it from West Virginia, and Virginia; to the southeast and south by Virginia and Tennessee; and to the west by the Mississippi River, which separates it from Missouri. The state has an area of 40,598 square miles; of this, 417 square miles, including the entire width of the Ohio River, over which it has jurisdiction, are water.
Physiography.—From mountain heights along its eastern border the surface of Kentucky is a north-western slope across two much dissected plateaus to a gracefully undulating lowland in the north central part and a longer western slope across the same plateaus to a lower and more level lowland at the western extremity. The narrow mountain belt is part of the western edge of the Appalachian Mountain Province in which parallel ridges of folded mountains, the Cumberland and the Pine, have crests 2000-3000 ft. high, and the Big Black Mountain rises to 4000 ft. The highest point in the state is The Double on the Virginia state line, in the eastern part of Harlan county with an altitude of over 4100 ft. The entire eastern quarter of the state, coterminous with the Eastern Kentucky coal-field, is commonly known as the region of the “mountains,” but with the exception of the narrow area just described it properly belongs to the Alleghany Plateau Province. This plateau belt is exceedingly rugged with sharp ridges alternating with narrow valleys which have steep sides but are seldom more than 1500 ft. above the sea. The remainder of the state which lies east of the Tennessee river is divided into the Highland Rim Plateau and a lowland basin, eroded in the Highland Rim Plateau and known as the Blue Grass Region; this region is separated from the Highland Rim Plateau by a semicircular escarpment extending from Portsmouth, Ohio, at the mouth of the Scioto river, to the mouth of the Salt river below Louisville; it is bounded north by the Ohio river. The Highland Rim Plateau, lying to the south, east and west of the escarpment, embraces fully one-half of the state, slopes from elevations of 1000-1200 ft. or more in the east to about 500 ft. in the north-west, and is generally much less rugged than the Alleghany Plateau; a peculiar feature of the southern portion of it is the numerous circular depressions (sink holes) in the surface and the cavernous region beneath. Kentucky is noted for its caves, the best-known of which are Mammoth Cave and Colossal Cavern (qq.v.). The caves are cut in the beds of limestone (lying immediately below the coal-bearing series) by streams that pass beneath the surface in the “sink holes,” and according to Professor N. S. Shaler there are altogether “doubtless a hundred thousand miles of ways large enough to permit the easy passage of man.” Down the steep slopes of the escarpment the Highland Rim Plateau drops 200 ft. or more to the famous Blue Grass Region, in which erosion has developed on limestone a gracefully undulating surface. This Blue Grass Region is like a beautiful park, without ragged cliffs, precipitous slopes, or flat marshy bottoms, but marked by rounded hills and dales. Especially within a radius of 20 m. around Lexington, the country is clothed with an unusually luxuriant vegetation. During spring, autumn, and winter in particular, the blue-grass (Poa compressa and Poa pratensis) spreads a mat, green, thick, fine and soft, over much of the country, and it is a good winter pasture; about the middle of June it blooms, and, owing to the hue of its seed vessels, gives the landscape a bluish hue. Another lowland area embraces that small part of the state in the extreme south-east which lies west of the Tennessee river; this belongs to that part of the Coastal Plain Region which extends north along the Mississippi river; it has in Kentucky an average elevation of less than 500 ft. Most of the larger rivers of the state have their sources among the mountains or on the Alleghany Plateau and flow more or less circuitously in a general north-western direction into the Ohio. Although deep river channels are common, falls or impassable rapids are rare west of the Alleghany Plateau, and the state has an extensive mileage of navigable waters. The Licking, Kentucky, Green and Tradewater are the principal rivers wholly within the state. The Cumberland, after flowing for a considerable distance in the south-east and south central part of the state, passes into Tennessee at a point nearly south of Louisville, and in the extreme south-west the Cumberland and the Tennessee, with only a short distance between them, cross Kentucky and enter the Mississippi at Smithland and Paducah respectively. The drainage of the region under which the caverns lie is mostly underground.
Physiography.—From the mountain heights along its eastern border, Kentucky's surface slopes north-west across two highly dissected plateaus to a gently rolling lowland in the north-central part, and a longer western slope across the same plateaus to a lower and flatter lowland in the west. The narrow mountain belt is part of the western edge of the Appalachian Mountain Province, where there are parallel ridges of folded mountains, the Cumberland and the Pine, that reach heights of 2000-3000 ft., while Big Black Mountain rises to 4000 ft. The tallest point in the state is The Double, located on the Virginia state line in eastern Harlan County, with an elevation of over 4100 ft. The entire eastern quarter of the state, coinciding with the Eastern Kentucky coalfield, is commonly referred to as the “mountains” region, but aside from the narrow area just described, it actually belongs to the Alleghany Plateau Province. This plateau region is very rugged, featuring sharp ridges alternating with narrow valleys that have steep sides but are usually not more than 1500 ft. above sea level. The rest of the state, lying east of the Tennessee River, is divided into the Highland Rim Plateau and a lowland basin, which has been eroded in the Highland Rim Plateau and is known as the Blue Grass Region; this area is separated from the Highland Rim Plateau by a semicircular escarpment extending from Portsmouth, Ohio, at the mouth of the Scioto River, to the mouth of the Salt River below Louisville, and is bounded to the north by the Ohio River. The Highland Rim Plateau, which lies south, east, and west of the escarpment, covers about half of the state, sloping from elevations of 1000-1200 ft. or more in the east down to about 500 ft. in the northwest, and is generally much less rugged than the Alleghany Plateau. A unique feature of the southern part of it is the numerous circular depressions (sinkholes) on the surface and the cavernous area beneath. Kentucky is known for its caves, the most famous of which are Mammoth Cave and Colossal Cavern (qq.v.). The caves are formed in limestone (located just below the coal-bearing layers) by streams that flow underground through the “sinkholes,” and according to Professor N. S. Shaler, there are “doubtless a hundred thousand miles of pathways large enough for easy human passage.” Down the steep slopes of the escarpment, the Highland Rim Plateau descends 200 ft. or more to the renowned Blue Grass Region, where erosion has created a gently undulating surface on limestone. This Blue Grass Region resembles a beautiful park, free of jagged cliffs, steep slopes, or flat marshy areas, instead featuring rounded hills and valleys. Particularly within a 20-mile radius around Lexington, the area boasts unusually lush vegetation. During spring, autumn, and especially winter, the bluegrass (Poa compressa and Poa pratensis) forms a thick, soft, green mat across much of the region, serving as good winter pasture; it blooms around mid-June, and its seed heads give the landscape a bluish tint. Another lowland area includes a small section of the state in the far southeast that lies west of the Tennessee River; this area is part of the Coastal Plain Region extending north along the Mississippi River, with an average elevation in Kentucky of less than 500 ft. Most of the major rivers in the state originate in the mountains or on the Alleghany Plateau and flow in a generally northwestern direction into the Ohio, often taking a winding route. While deep river channels are common, waterfalls or impassable rapids are rare west of the Alleghany Plateau, giving the state a significant amount of navigable waterways. The Licking, Kentucky, Green, and Tradewater rivers are the main rivers entirely contained within the state. The Cumberland River flows for a considerable distance through the southeast and south-central parts of the state before entering Tennessee nearly south of Louisville, and in the far southwest, the Cumberland and Tennessee rivers come very close to each other as they cross Kentucky, entering the Mississippi at Smithland and Paducah, respectively. Most of the drainage for the area containing the caverns is underground.

Fauna and Flora.—The first white settlers found great numbers of buffaloes, deer, elks, geese, ducks, turkeys and partridges, also many bears, panthers, lynx, wolves, foxes, beavers, otters, minks, musk-rats, rabbits, squirrels, raccoons, woodchucks, opossums and 741 skunks, and the streams were inhabited by trout, perch, buffalo-fish, sun-fish, mullet, eels, and suckers. Of the larger game there remain only a few deer, bears and lynx in the mountain districts, and the numbers of small game and fish have been greatly reduced. In its primeval state Kentucky was generally well timbered, but most of the middle section has been cleared and here the blue grass is now the dominant feature of the flora. Extensive forest areas still remain both in the east and the west. In the east oak, maple, beech, chestnut, elm, tulip-tree (locally “yellow poplar”), walnut, pine and cedar trees are the most numerous; in the west the forests are composed largely of cypress, ash, oak, hickory, chestnut, walnut, beech, tulip-tree, gum and sycamore trees. Locust, pawpaw, cucumber, buck-eye, black mulberry and wild cherry trees also abound, and the grape, raspberry and strawberry are native fruits.
Fauna and Flora.—The first white settlers found a huge number of buffalo, deer, elk, geese, ducks, turkeys, and partridges, as well as many bears, panthers, lynxes, wolves, foxes, beavers, otters, minks, muskrats, rabbits, squirrels, raccoons, woodchucks, opossums, and skunks. The streams were home to trout, perch, buffalo fish, sunfish, mullet, eels, and suckers. Of the larger game, only a few deer, bears, and lynxes remain in the mountainous areas, and the populations of small game and fish have been greatly reduced. In its natural state, Kentucky was generally well-forested, but most of the central area has been cleared, and now bluegrass is the dominant feature of the flora. Large forest areas still exist in both the east and the west. In the east, the most common trees are oak, maple, beech, chestnut, elm, tulip tree (locally known as “yellow poplar”), walnut, pine, and cedar; in the west, the forests mainly consist of cypress, ash, oak, hickory, chestnut, walnut, beech, tulip tree, gum, and sycamore trees. Locust, pawpaw, cucumber, buckeye, black mulberry, and wild cherry trees are also plentiful, and grape, raspberry, and strawberry are native fruits.
Climate.—The climate is somewhat more mild and even than that of the neighbouring states. The mean annual temperature, about 50° F. on the mountains in the S.E., and 60° W. of the Tennessee, is about 55° F. for the entire state; the thermometer seldom registers as high as 100° or as low as -10°. The mean annual precipitation ranges from about 38 in. in the north-east to 50 in. in the south, and is about 46 in. for the entire state; it is usually distributed evenly throughout the year and very little is in the form of snow. The prevailing winds blow from the west or south-west; rain-bearing winds blow mostly from the south; and the cold waves come from the north or north-west.
Climate.—The climate is somewhat milder and more consistent than that of the neighboring states. The average annual temperature is about 50° F. in the southeastern mountains and 60° W. of the Tennessee, with an overall average of about 55° F. for the entire state; the temperature rarely gets as high as 100° or as low as -10°. The average annual precipitation ranges from about 38 inches in the northeast to 50 inches in the south, with an overall average of around 46 inches for the state; it is typically spread evenly throughout the year, and there is very little snowfall. The prevailing winds come from the west or southwest; rain-bearing winds mostly come from the south; and cold fronts arrive from the north or northwest.
Soil.—The best soils are the alluvium in the bottom-lands along some of the larger rivers and that of the Blue Grass Region, which is derived from a limestone rich in organic matter (containing phosphorus) and rapidly decomposing. The soil within a radius of some 20 m. around Lexington is especially rich; outside of this area the Blue Grass soil is less rich in phosphorus and contains a larger mixture of sand. The soils of the Highland Rim Plateau as well as of the lowland west of the Tennessee river vary greatly, but the most common are a clay, containing more or less carbonate of lime, and a sandy loam. On the escarpment around the Blue Grass Region the soils are for the most part either cherty or stiff with clay and of inferior quality. On the mountains and on the Alleghany Plateau, also, much of the soil is very light and thin.
Soil.—The best soils are the alluvial ones found in the lowlands along some of the larger rivers and those from the Blue Grass Region, which come from limestone rich in organic matter (containing phosphorus) that breaks down quickly. The soil within about 20 meters around Lexington is especially fertile; outside this area, the Blue Grass soil has less phosphorus and contains more sandy material. The soils of the Highland Rim Plateau and the lowlands west of the Tennessee River vary widely, but the most common types include clay with varying amounts of calcium carbonate and sandy loam. On the escarpment surrounding the Blue Grass Region, the soils are mostly either rocky or dense with clay and of lower quality. In the mountains and on the Allegheny Plateau, much of the soil is quite light and thin.
Agriculture.—Kentucky is chiefly an agricultural state. Of the 752,531 of its inhabitants who, in 1900, were engaged in some gainful occupation, 408,185 or 54.2%, were agriculturists, and of its total land surface 21,979,422 acres, or 85.9%, were included in farms. The percentage of improved farm land increased from 35.2 in 1850 to 49.9 in 1880 and to 62.5 in 1900. The number of farms increased from 74,777 in 1850 to 166,453 in 1880 and to 234,667 in 1900; and their average size decreased from 226.7 acres in 1850 to 129.1 acres in 1880 and to 93.7 acres in 1900, these changes being largely due to the breaking up of slave estates, the introduction of a considerable number of negro farmers, and the increased cultivation of tobacco and market-garden produce. In the best stock-raising country, e.g. in Fayette county, the opposite tendency prevailed during the latter part of this period and old farms of a few hundred acres were combined to form some vast estates of from 2000 to 4000 acres. Of the 234,667 farms in 1900, 155,189 contained less than 100 acres, 76,450 contained between 100 and 500 acres, and 558 contained more than 1000 acres; 152,216 or 64.86%, were operated by owners or part owners, of whom 5320 were negroes; 16,776 by cash tenants, of whom 789 were negroes; and 60,289 by share tenants, of whom 4984 were negroes. In 1900 the value of farm land and improvements was $291,117,430; of buildings on farms, $90,887,460; of livestock, $73,739,106. In the year 1899 the value of all farm products was $123,266,785 (of which $21,128,530 was the value of products fed to livestock), including the following items: crops, $74,783,365; animal products, $44,303,940; and forest products, $4,179,840. The total acreage of all crops in 1899 was 6,582,696. Indian corn is the largest and most valuable crop. As late as 1849, when it produced 58,672,591 bu., Kentucky was the second largest Indian-corn producing state in the Union. In 1899 the crop had increased to 73,974,220 bu. and the acreage was 3,319,257 (more than half the acreage of all crops in the state), but the rank had fallen to ninth in product and eleventh in acreage; in 1909 (according to the Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture) the crop was 103,472,000 bu. (ninth among the states of the United States), and the acreage was 3,568,000 (twelfth among the states). Among the cereals wheat is the next largest crop; it increased from 2,142,822 bu. in 1849 to 11,356,113 bu. in 1879, and to 14,264,500 bu. in 1899; in 1909 it was only 7,906,000 bu. The crop of each of the other cereals is small and in each case was less in 1899 than in 1849. The culture of tobacco, which is the second most valuable crop in the state, was begun in the north part about 1780 and in the west and south early in the 19th century, but it was late in that century before it was introduced to any considerable extent in the Blue Grass Region, where it was then in a measure substituted for the culture of hemp. By 1849 Kentucky ranked second only to Virginia in the production of tobacco, and in 1899 it was far ahead of any other state in both acreage and yield, there being in that year 384,805 acres, which was 34.9% of the total acreage in the continental United States, yielding 314,288,050 ℔. As compared with the state’s Indian corn crop of that year, the acreage was only a little more than one-ninth, but the value ($18,541,982) was about 63%. In 1909 the tobacco acreage in Kentucky was 420,000, the crop was 350,700,000 ℔, valued at $37,174,200; the average price per pound had increased from 5.9 cents in 1899 to 10.6 cents in 1909. The two most important tobacco-growing districts are: the Black Patch, in the extreme south-west corner of the state, which with the adjacent counties in Tennessee grows a black heavy leaf bought almost entirely by the agents of foreign governments (especially Austria, Spain and Italy) and called “regie” tobacco; and the Blue Grass Region, as far east as Maysville, and the hill country south and east, whose product, the red and white Burley, is a fine-fibred light leaf, peculiarly absorbent of licorice and other adulterants used in the manufacture of sweet chewing tobacco, and hence a peculiarly valuable crop, which formerly averaged 22 cents a pound for all grades.1 The high price received by the hill growers of the Burley induced farmers in the Blue Grass to plant Burley tobacco there, where the crop proved a great success, more than twice as much (sometimes 2000 ℔) being grown to the acre in the Blue Grass as in the hills and twice as large patches being easily managed. In the hill country the share tenant could usually plant and cultivate only four acres of tobacco, had to spend 120 days working the crop, and could use the same land for tobacco only once in six years. So, although a price of 6.5 cents a pound covered expenses of the planter of Burley in the Blue Grass, who could use the same land for tobacco once in four years, this price did not repay the hill planter. The additional production of the Blue Grass Region sent the price of Burley tobacco down to this figure and below it. The planters in the Black Patch had met a combination of the buyers by forming a pool, the Planters’ Protective Association, into which 40,000 growers were forced by “night-riding” and other forms of coercion and persuasion, and had thus secured an advance to 11 cents a pound from the “regie” buyers and had shown the efficacy of pooling methods in securing better prices for the tobacco crop. Following their example, the planters of the Burley formed the Burley Tobacco Society, a Burley pool, with headquarters at Winchester and associated with the American Society of Equity, which promoted in general the pooling of different crops throughout the country. The tobacco planters secured legislation favourable to the formation of crop pools. The Burley Tobacco Society attempted to pool the entire crop and thus force the buyers of the American Tobacco Company of New Jersey (which usually bought more than three-fourths of the crop of Burley) to pay a much higher price for it. In 1906 and in 1907 the crop was very large; the pool sold its lower grades of the 1906 crop at 16 cents a pound to the American Tobacco Company and forced the independent buyers out of business; and the Burley Society decided in 1907 to grow no more tobacco until the 1906 and 1907 crops were sold, making the price high enough to pay for this period of idleness. Members of the pool had used force to bring planters into the pool; and now some tobacco growers, especially in the hills, planted new crops in the hope of immediate return, and a new “night-riding” war was begun on them. Bands of masked men rode about the country both in the Black Patch and in the Burley, burning tobacco houses of the independent planters, scraping their newly-planted tobacco patches, demanding that planters join their organization or leave the country, and whipping or shooting the recalcitrants. Governor Willson, immediately after his inauguration, took measures to suppress disorder. In general the Planters’ Protective Association in the Black Patch was more successful in its pool than the Burley Tobacco Society in its, and there was more violence in the “regie” than in the “Burley” district. In November 1908 the lawlessness subsided in the Burley after the agreement of the American Tobacco Company to purchase the remainder of the 1906 crop at a “round” price of 20½ cents and a part of the 1907 crop at an average price of 17 cents, thus making it profitable to raise a full crop in 1909.
Agriculture.—Kentucky is mainly an agricultural state. Of the 752,531 people engaged in work in 1900, 408,185, or 54.2%, were farmers. Out of its total land area of 21,979,422 acres, 85.9% was considered farmland. The percentage of improved farmland rose from 35.2% in 1850 to 49.9% in 1880 and to 62.5% in 1900. The number of farms grew from 74,777 in 1850 to 166,453 in 1880 and to 234,667 in 1900, while the average size of farms decreased from 226.7 acres in 1850 to 129.1 acres in 1880 and to 93.7 acres in 1900. These changes were mostly due to the division of slave estates, the introduction of a significant number of Black farmers, and an increased focus on growing tobacco and produce for markets. In the best cattle-raising regions, like Fayette County, larger farms were combined into vast estates ranging from 2,000 to 4,000 acres during the later part of this period. Of the 234,667 farms in 1900, 155,189 were under 100 acres, 76,450 were between 100 and 500 acres, and 558 were over 1,000 acres; 152,216, or 64.86%, were run by owners or partial owners, including 5,320 Black owners; 16,776 were cash tenants, of whom 789 were Black; and 60,289 were share tenants, with 4,984 being Black. In 1900, the total value of farmland and improvements was $291,117,430; buildings on farms were valued at $90,887,460; and livestock was worth $73,739,106. In 1899, the total value of all farm products was $123,266,785 (including $21,128,530 for products fed to livestock), with crops valued at $74,783,365; animal products worth $44,303,940; and forest products totaling $4,179,840. The total acreage for crops in 1899 was 6,582,696. Corn was the largest and most valuable crop. As recently as 1849, when it produced 58,672,591 bushels, Kentucky was the second-largest corn-producing state in the country. By 1899, production had increased to 73,974,220 bushels, and the acreage was 3,319,257 (more than half the total acreage of all crops in the state), but its ranking dropped to ninth in production and eleventh in acreage; in 1909 (according to the Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture), it reached 103,472,000 bushels (ninth among U.S. states), with an acreage of 3,568,000 (twelfth among states). Among cereals, wheat was next in size, increasing from 2,142,822 bushels in 1849 to 11,356,113 bushels in 1879, and to 14,264,500 bushels in 1899; in 1909, it had decreased to 7,906,000 bushels. The production of other cereals was small, with each producing less in 1899 than in 1849. Tobacco, the second most valuable crop in the state, began to be cultivated in the northern part around 1780 and in the west and south early in the 19th century, but it wasn’t until late in that century that it became significant in the Blue Grass Region, where it partly replaced hemp cultivation. By 1849, Kentucky ranked just behind Virginia in tobacco production, and by 1899, it was far ahead of other states in both acreage and yield, with 384,805 acres, constituting 34.9% of the total tobacco acreage in the continental U.S. The yield that year was 314,288,050 pounds. In comparison to the corn crop, the tobacco acreage was only about one-ninth, but its value ($18,541,982) was around 63%. By 1909, Kentucky's tobacco acreage rose to 420,000 with a crop yield of 350,700,000 pounds, valued at $37,174,200; the average price per pound had gone up from 5.9 cents in 1899 to 10.6 cents in 1909. The two main tobacco-growing areas are the Black Patch in the far southwestern corner, which, along with nearby Tennessee counties, produces a heavy black leaf tobacco bought mostly by foreign agents (especially from Austria, Spain, and Italy) known as “regie” tobacco; and the Blue Grass Region, extending as far east as Maysville, producing the red and white Burley tobacco, a finely textured light leaf highly absorbent of licorice and other additives used in sweet chewing tobacco, making it a particularly valuable crop, initially averaging 22 cents per pound for all grades. The high price for Burley encouraged Blue Grass farmers to grow it, where yields were over twice as high (sometimes 2,000 pounds) per acre compared to the hills, and larger patches could be easily managed. In the hill country, share tenants typically managed only four acres of tobacco; they spent 120 days working the crop and could use the same land for tobacco only once every six years. Thus, although 6.5 cents per pound covered the costs for Blue Grass Burley growers, it didn’t compensate hill farmers. The increased production from the Blue Grass sent Burley prices down to this level and below. Black Patch growers formed a cooperative called the Planters’ Protective Association, pressuring about 40,000 growers into the pool through intimidation, securing higher prices of 11 cents per pound from “regie” buyers and demonstrating the effectiveness of pooling for better prices. Inspired by this, Burley planters established the Burley Tobacco Society, a cooperative based in Winchester, in line with the American Society of Equity, which generally promoted crop pooling nationwide. Tobacco farmers secured supportive legislation for the formation of crop pools. The Burley Tobacco Society tried to pool the entire crop to compel American Tobacco Company of New Jersey (which typically purchased over three-fourths of the Burley crop) to increase prices. In 1906 and 1907, the crop was exceptionally large; the pool sold the lower grades of the 1906 crop at 16 cents per pound to the American Tobacco Company, driving independent buyers out of business. The Burley Society then decided in 1907 to stop growing more tobacco until the 1906 and 1907 crops were sold at prices high enough to offset this downtime. Some pool members used coercion to recruit farmers, leading some growers, especially in the hills, to plant new crops for quick returns, igniting a new “night-riding” conflict against them. Groups of masked men rode through both the Black Patch and Burley areas, burning independent farmers' tobacco houses, destroying their new tobacco patches, pressuring farmers to join their group or leave the area, and meting out punishments to dissenters. After his inauguration, Governor Willson made efforts to restore order. Generally, the Planters’ Protective Association in the Black Patch had more success with their cooperative than the Burley Tobacco Society did, with more violence in the “regie” area compared to the “Burley” region. By November 1908, lawlessness in Burley subsided after the American Tobacco Company agreed to buy the remainder of the 1906 crop at a flat price of 20½ cents and part of the 1907 crop at an average of 17 cents, thus making it possible to grow a full crop in 1909.
Kentucky is the principal hemp-growing state of the Union; the crop of 1899, which was grown on 14,107 acres and amounted to 10,303,560 ℔, valued at $468,454, was 87.7% of the hemp crop of the whole country. But the competition of cheaper labour in other countries reduced the profits on this plant and the product of 1899 was a decrease from 78,818,000 ℔ in 1859. Hay and forage, the fourth in value of the state’s crops in 1899, were grown on 683,139 acres and amounted to 776,534 tons, valued at $6,100,647; in 1909 the acreage of hay was 480,000 and the crop of 653,000 tons was valued at $7,771,000. In 1899 the total value of fruit grown in Kentucky was $2,491,457 (making the state rank thirteenth among the states of the Union in the value of this product), of which $1,943,645 was the value of orchard fruits and $435,462 that of small fruits. Among fruits, apples are produced in greatest abundance, 6,053,717 bu. in 1899, an amount exceeded in only nine states; in 1889 the crop had been 10,679,389 bu. and was exceeded only by the crop of Ohio and by that of Michigan. Kentucky also grows considerable quantities of cherries, pears, plums and peaches, and, for its size, ranks high in its crops of strawberries, blackberries and raspberries. Indian corn is grown in all parts of the state but most largely in the western portion. Wheat is grown both in the Blue Grass Region and farther west; and the best country for fruit is along the Ohio river between Cincinnati and Louisville and in the hilly land surrounding the Blue Grass Region. In the eastern part of the state 742 where crops are generally light, Indian corn, oats and potatoes are the principal products, but tobacco, flax and cotton are grown. The thoroughbred Kentucky horse has long had a world-wide reputation for speed; and the Blue Grass Region, especially Fayette, Bourbon and Woodford counties, is probably the finest horse-breeding region in America and has large breeding farms. In Fayette county, in 1900, the average value of colts between the ages of one and two years was $377.78. In the Blue Grass Region many thoroughbred shorthorn cattle and fine mules are raised. The numbers of horses, mules, cattle and sheep increased quite steadily from 1850 to 1900, but the number of swine in 1880 and in 1900 was nearly one-third less than in 1850. In 1900 the state had 497,245 horses, 198,110 mules, 364,025 dairy cows, 755,714 other neat cattle, 1,300,832 sheep and 2,008,989 swine; in 1910 there were in Kentucky 407,000 horses, 207,000 mules, 394,000 milch cows, 665,000 other neat cattle, 1,060,000 sheep and 989,000 swine. The principal sheep-raising counties in 1905 were Bourbon, Scott and Harrison, and the principal hog-raising counties were Graves, Hardin, Ohio, Union and Hickman.
Kentucky is the leading hemp-growing state in the U.S.; in 1899, the crop was grown on 14,107 acres and produced 10,303,560 pounds, valued at $468,454, which accounted for 87.7% of the country's total hemp crop. However, competition from cheaper labor in other countries cut the profits for this plant, as the 1899 harvest was down from 78,818,000 pounds in 1859. Hay and forage, which ranked fourth in value among the state’s crops in 1899, were cultivated on 683,139 acres and totaled 776,534 tons, worth $6,100,647; by 1909, hay acreage was reduced to 480,000 and the yield of 653,000 tons was valued at $7,771,000. In 1899, the total value of fruit produced in Kentucky was $2,491,457, placing the state thirteenth nationally in this category. Of this, $1,943,645 came from orchard fruits, while small fruits contributed $435,462. Apples were the most abundant fruit, with 6,053,717 bushels produced in 1899, a quantity surpassed in only nine other states; back in 1889, the crop had reached 10,679,389 bushels, only trailing those of Ohio and Michigan. Kentucky also produces significant amounts of cherries, pears, plums, and peaches, and, relative to its size, has a high output of strawberries, blackberries, and raspberries. Indian corn is grown throughout the state, especially in the western regions. Wheat is cultivated in both the Blue Grass Region and further west, with the best fruit-growing areas found along the Ohio River between Cincinnati and Louisville, as well as in the hilly land surrounding the Blue Grass Region. In the eastern part of the state, where crop yields are generally low, Indian corn, oats, and potatoes are the main products, alongside tobacco, flax, and cotton. The thoroughbred Kentucky horse has a long-standing reputation for speed; the Blue Grass Region, particularly Fayette, Bourbon, and Woodford counties, is likely the top horse-breeding area in America, featuring large breeding farms. In Fayette County, in 1900, the average value of colts aged one to two years was $377.78. The Blue Grass Region is also known for raising a significant number of thoroughbred shorthorn cattle and quality mules. The populations of horses, mules, cattle, and sheep steadily increased from 1850 to 1900, while the number of pigs in 1880 and 1900 was nearly one-third less than in 1850. By 1900, the state had 497,245 horses, 198,110 mules, 364,025 dairy cows, 755,714 other cattle, 1,300,832 sheep, and 2,008,989 swine; by 1910, Kentucky had 407,000 horses, 207,000 mules, 394,000 milk cows, 665,000 other cattle, 1,060,000 sheep, and 989,000 swine. The main sheep-raising counties in 1905 included Bourbon, Scott, and Harrison, while the top hog-raising counties were Graves, Hardin, Ohio, Union, and Hickman.
Forests and Timber.—More than one-half of the state (about 22,200 sq. m.) was in 1900 still wooded. In 1900 of the total cut of 777,218 M. ft., B.M., 392,804 were white oak and 279,740 M. ft. were tulip-tree. Logging is the principal industry of several localities, especially in the east, and the lumber product of the state increased in value from $1,502,434 in 1850 to $4,064,361 in 1880, and to $13,774,911 in 1900. The factory product in 1900 was valued at $13,338,533 and in 1905 at $14,539,000. In 1905 of a total of 586,371 M. ft., B.M., of sawed lumber, 295,776 M. ft. were oak and 153,057 M. ft. were “poplar.”
Forests and Timber.—More than half of the state (about 22,200 sq. m.) was still forested in 1900. Of the total cut of 777,218 M. ft., B.M., 392,804 were white oak and 279,740 M. ft. were tulip-tree. Logging is the main industry in several areas, especially in the east, and the value of the state's lumber output increased from $1,502,434 in 1850 to $4,064,361 in 1880, and to $13,774,911 in 1900. The factory output in 1900 was valued at $13,338,533, and in 1905 at $14,539,000. In 1905, of a total of 586,371 M. ft., B.M., of sawed lumber, 295,776 M. ft. were oak and 153,057 M. ft. were “poplar.”
The planing mill industry is increasing rapidly, as it is found cheaper to erect mills near the forests; between 1900 and 1905 the capital of planing mills in the state increased 117.2% and the value of products increased 142.8%.
The planing mill industry is growing quickly, as it’s more cost-effective to set up mills close to the forests; between 1900 and 1905, the investment in planing mills in the state rose by 117.2%, and the value of products grew by 142.8%.
Manufactures.—Kentucky’s manufactures are principally those for which the products of her farms and forests furnish the raw material. The most distinctive of these is probably distilled liquors, the state’s whisky being famous. A colony of Roman Catholic immigrants from Maryland settled in 1787 along the Salt river about 50 m. S.S.E. of Louisville and with the surplus of their Indian corn crop made whisky, a part of which they sold at settlements on the Ohio and the Mississippi. The industry was rapidly developed by distillers, who immediately after the suppression of the Whisky Insurrection, in 1794, removed from Pennsylvania and settled in what is now Mason county and was then a part of Bourbon county—the product is still known as “Bourbon” whisky. During the first half of the 19th century the industry became of considerable local importance in all parts of the state, but since the Civil War the heavy tax imposed has caused its concentration in large establishments. In 1900 nearly 40% and in 1905 more than one-third of the state’s product was distilled in Louisville. Good whisky is made in Maryland and in parts of Pennsylvania from rye, but all efforts in other states to produce from Indian corn a whisky equal to the Bourbon have failed, and it is probable that the quality of the Bourbon is largely due to the character of the Kentucky lime water and the Kentucky yeast germs. The average annual product of the state from 1880 to 1900 was about 20,000,000 gallons; in 1900 the product was valued at $9,786,527; in 1905 at $11,204,649. In 1900 and in 1905 Kentucky ranked fourth among the states in the value of distilled liquors.
Manufactures.—Kentucky's manufacturing mainly focuses on products that use raw materials from its farms and forests. The most notable of these is probably distilled liquor, with the state's whiskey being famous. A group of Roman Catholic immigrants from Maryland settled in 1787 along the Salt River, about 50 miles south-southeast of Louisville. With their surplus Indian corn crop, they made whiskey, part of which was sold at settlements along the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. The industry grew quickly, especially after the Whisky Rebellion of 1794, when distillers moved from Pennsylvania to what is now Mason County, which was then part of Bourbon County—the product is still known as "Bourbon" whiskey. During the first half of the 19th century, the industry gained local significance throughout the state, but after the Civil War, heavy taxes led to consolidation in larger operations. In 1900, nearly 40% of the state's whiskey was distilled in Louisville, and by 1905, more than one-third was produced there. Good whiskey is also made in Maryland and parts of Pennsylvania from rye, but other states have struggled to produce whiskey from Indian corn that matches Bourbon’s quality. This is likely due to the unique characteristics of Kentucky's lime water and yeast. The average annual production of the state from 1880 to 1900 was around 20 million gallons; in 1900, the value of the product was $9,786,527; in 1905, it reached $11,204,649. In both 1900 and 1905, Kentucky ranked fourth among the states in the value of distilled liquors.
The total value of all manufactured products of the state increased from $126,719,857 in 1890 to $154,166,365 in 1900, or 21.7%, and from 1900 to 1905 the value of factory-made products alone increased from $126,508,660 to $159,753,968, or 26.3%.2 Measured by the value of the product, flour and grist mill products rose from third in rank in 1900 to first in rank in 1905, from $13,017,043 to $18,007,786, or 38.3%; and chewing and smoking tobacco and snuff fell during the same period from first to third in rank, from $14,948,192 to $13,117,000, or 12.3%; in 1900 Kentucky was second, in 1905 third, among the states in the value of this product. Lumber and timber products held second rank both in 1900 ($13,338,533) and in 1905 ($14,539,000). Distilled liquors were fourth in rank in 1900 and in 1905. Men’s clothing rose from tenth in rank in 1900 to fifth in rank in 1905, from $3,420,365 to $6,279,078, or 83.6%. Other important manufactures, with their product values in 1900 and in 1905, are iron and steel ($5,004,572 in 1900; $6,167,542 in 1905); railway cars ($4,248,029 in 1900; $5,739,071 in 1905); packed meats ($5,177,167 in 1900; $5,693,731 in 1905); foundry and machine shop products ($4,434,610 in 1900; $4,699,559 in 1905); planing mill products, including sash, doors and blinds ($1,891,517 in 1900; $4,593,251 in 1905—an increase already remarked); carriages and wagons ($2,849,713 in 1900; $4,059,438 in 1905); tanned and curried leather ($3,757,016 in 1900; $3,952,277 in 1905); and malt liquors ($3,186,627 in 1900; $3,673,678 in 1905). Other important manufactures (each with a product value in 1905 of more than one million dollars) were cotton-seed oil and cake (in 1900 Kentucky was fifth and in 1905 sixth among the states in the value of cotton-seed oil and cake), cooperage, agricultural implements, boots and shoes, cigars and cigarettes, saddlery and harness, patent medicines and compounds, cotton goods, furniture, confectionery, carriage and wagon materials, wooden packing boxes, woollen goods, pottery and terra cotta ware, structural iron-work, and turned and carved wood. Louisville is the great manufacturing centre, the value of its products amounting in 1905 to $83,204,125, 52.1% of the product of the entire state, and showing an increase of 25.9% over the value of the city’s factory products in 1900. Ashland is the principal centre of the iron industry.
The total value of all manufactured products in the state increased from $126,719,857 in 1890 to $154,166,365 in 1900, which is a rise of 21.7%. From 1900 to 1905, the value of factory-made products went up from $126,508,660 to $159,753,968, or 26.3%. 2 Looking at the product value, flour and grist mill products went from third place in 1900 to first place in 1905, increasing from $13,017,043 to $18,007,786, or 38.3%. Meanwhile, chewing and smoking tobacco and snuff dropped from first to third place, going from $14,948,192 to $13,117,000, or 12.3%. In 1900, Kentucky was second in this category, but in 1905, it fell to third. Lumber and timber products held the second position in both 1900 ($13,338,533) and 1905 ($14,539,000). Distilled liquors remained fourth in both years as well. Men’s clothing climbed from tenth place in 1900 to fifth place in 1905, increasing from $3,420,365 to $6,279,078, or 83.6%. Other significant manufactures, along with their product values in 1900 and 1905, include iron and steel ($5,004,572 in 1900; $6,167,542 in 1905), railway cars ($4,248,029 in 1900; $5,739,071 in 1905), packed meats ($5,177,167 in 1900; $5,693,731 in 1905), foundry and machine shop products ($4,434,610 in 1900; $4,699,559 in 1905), planing mill products, including sash, doors, and blinds ($1,891,517 in 1900; $4,593,251 in 1905—an increase noted earlier), carriages and wagons ($2,849,713 in 1900; $4,059,438 in 1905), tanned and curried leather ($3,757,016 in 1900; $3,952,277 in 1905), and malt liquors ($3,186,627 in 1900; $3,673,678 in 1905). Other significant manufactures, each exceeding a product value of over one million dollars in 1905, were cotton-seed oil and cake (where Kentucky ranked fifth in 1900 and sixth in 1905), cooperage, agricultural implements, boots and shoes, cigars and cigarettes, saddlery and harness, patent medicines and compounds, cotton goods, furniture, confectionery, carriage and wagon materials, wooden packing boxes, woolen goods, pottery and terra cotta ware, structural ironwork, and turned and carved wood. Louisville is the major manufacturing center, with the value of its products reaching $83,204,125 in 1905, making up 52.1% of the state's total products and showing a 25.9% increase over the city’s factory product value in 1900. Ashland is the primary hub for the iron industry.
Minerals.—The mineral resources of Kentucky are important and valuable, though very little developed. The value of all manufactures in 1900 was $154,166,365, and the value of manufactures based upon products of mines or quarries in the same year was $25,204,788; the total value of mineral products was $19,294,341 in 1907. Bituminous coal is the principal mineral, and in 1907 Kentucky ranked eighth among the coal-producing states of the Union; the output in 1907 amounted to 10,753,124 short tons, and in 1902 to 6,766,984 short tons as compared with 2,399,755 tons produced in 1889. In 1902 the amount was about equally divided between the eastern coalfield, which is for the most part in Greenup, Boyd, Carter, Lawrence, Johnson, Lee, Breathitt, Rockcastle, Pulaski, Laurel, Knox, Bell and Whitley counties, and has an area of about 11,180 sq. m., and the western coalfield, which is in Henderson, Union, Webster, Daviess, Hancock, McLean, Ohio, Hopkins, Butler, Muhlenberg and Christian counties, and has an area of 5800 sq. m. In 1907 the output of the western district was 6,295,397 tons; that of the eastern, 4,457,727. The largest coal-producing counties in 1907 were Hopkins (2,064,154 short tons) and Muhlenberg (1,882,913 short tons) in the western coalfield, and Bell (1,437,886 short tons) and Whitley (762,923 short tons) in the south-western part of the eastern coalfield. All Kentucky coal is either bituminous or semi-bituminous, but of several varieties. Of cannel coal Kentucky is the largest producer in the Union, its output for 1902 being 65,317 short tons, and, according to state reports, for 1903, 72,856 tons (of which 46,314 tons were from Morgan county), and for 1904, 68,400 tons (of which 52,492 tons were from Morgan county); according to the Mineral Resources of the United States for 1907 (published by the United States Geological Survey) the production of Kentucky in 1907 of cannel coal (including 4650 tons of semi-cannel coal) was 77,733 tons, and exclusive of semi-cannel coal the output of Kentucky was much larger than that of any other state. Some of the coal mined in eastern Kentucky is an excellent steam producer, especially the Jellico coal of Whitley county, Kentucky, and of Campbell county, Tennessee. But with the exception of that mined in Hopkins and Bell counties, very little is fit for making coke; in 1880 the product was 4250 tons of coke (value $12,250), in 1890, 12,343 tons ($22,191); in 1900, 95,532 tons ($235,505); in 1902, 126,879 tons ($317,875), the maximum product up to 1906; and in 1907, 67,068 tons ($157,288). Coal was first mined in Kentucky in Laurel or Pulaski county in 1827; between 1829 and 1835 the annual output was from 2000 to 6000 tons; in 1840 it was 23,527 tons and in 1860 it was 285,760 tons.
Minerals.—Kentucky's mineral resources are significant and valuable but remain largely undeveloped. In 1900, the total value of all manufacturing was $154,166,365, and the value from products derived from mines or quarries in the same year was $25,204,788; the total value of mineral products reached $19,294,341 in 1907. Bituminous coal is the main mineral, and in 1907, Kentucky ranked eighth among the coal-producing states in the U.S.; the output that year was 10,753,124 short tons, compared to 6,766,984 short tons in 1902 and 2,399,755 tons produced in 1889. In 1902, the coal production was fairly evenly split between the eastern coalfield—mostly in Greenup, Boyd, Carter, Lawrence, Johnson, Lee, Breathitt, Rockcastle, Pulaski, Laurel, Knox, Bell, and Whitley counties, covering about 11,180 square miles—and the western coalfield, found in Henderson, Union, Webster, Daviess, Hancock, McLean, Ohio, Hopkins, Butler, Muhlenberg, and Christian counties, which spans 5,800 square miles. In 1907, the western district produced 6,295,397 tons, whereas the eastern district produced 4,457,727 tons. The leading coal-producing counties in 1907 were Hopkins (2,064,154 short tons) and Muhlenberg (1,882,913 short tons) in the western coalfield, and Bell (1,437,886 short tons) and Whitley (762,923 short tons) in the southwestern part of the eastern coalfield. All coal extracted in Kentucky is either bituminous or semi-bituminous, but it comes in several varieties. Kentucky ranks as the largest producer of cannel coal in the U.S., with an output of 65,317 short tons in 1902, and according to state reports, 72,856 tons in 1903 (including 46,314 tons from Morgan County), and 68,400 tons in 1904 (with 52,492 tons from Morgan County). According to the Mineral Resources of the United States for 1907 (published by the U.S. Geological Survey), Kentucky's cannel coal production in 1907 (which includes 4,650 tons of semi-cannel coal) was 77,733 tons, and when excluding semi-cannel coal, Kentucky's output was much greater than any other state. Some coal mined in eastern Kentucky is excellent for steam production, particularly the Jellico coal from Whitley County, Kentucky, and Campbell County, Tennessee. However, except for the coal mined in Hopkins and Bell counties, very little is suitable for coke production; in 1880, the output was 4,250 tons of coke (valued at $12,250), in 1890, 12,343 tons ($22,191); in 1900, 95,532 tons ($235,505); in 1902, 126,879 tons ($317,875), which was the peak output until 1906; and in 1907, 67,068 tons ($157,288). Coal was first mined in Kentucky in Laurel or Pulaski County in 1827; between 1829 and 1835, the annual output ranged from 2,000 to 6,000 tons; in 1840, it was 23,527 tons, and in 1860, it reached 285,760 tons.
Petroleum was discovered on Little Rennick’s Creek, near Burkesville, in Cumberland county, in 1829, when a flowing oil well (the “American well,” whose product was sold as “American oil” to heal rheumatism, burns, &c.) was struck by men boring for a “salt well,” and after a second discovery in the ’sixties at the mouth of Crocus Creek a small but steady amount of oil was got each year. Great pipe lines from Parkersburg, West Virginia, to Somerset, Pulaski county, and with branches to the Ragland, Barbourville and Prestonburg fields, had in 1902 a mileage of 275 m. The principal fields are in the “southern tier,” from Wayne to Allen county, including Barren county; farther east, Knox county, and Floyd and Knott counties; to the north-east the Ragland field in Bath and Rowan counties on the Licking river. In 1902 the petroleum produced in the state amounted to 248,950 barrels, valued at $172,837, a gain in quantity of 81.4% over 1901. Kentucky is the S.W. extreme of the natural gas region of the west flank of the Appalachian system; the greatest amount is found in Martin county in the east, and Breckinridge county in the north-west. The value of the state’s natural gas output increased from $38,993 in 1891 to $99,000 in 1896, $286,243 in 1900, $365,611 in 1902, and $380,176 in 1907.
Petroleum was discovered on Little Rennick’s Creek, near Burkesville, in Cumberland County, in 1829, when a flowing oil well (the “American well,” whose product was sold as “American oil” to treat rheumatism, burns, etc.) was found by workers drilling for a “salt well.” After a second discovery in the ’60s at the mouth of Crocus Creek, a small but steady amount of oil was produced each year. By 1902, there were major pipelines running from Parkersburg, West Virginia, to Somerset in Pulaski County, with branches to the Ragland, Barbourville, and Prestonburg fields, totaling 275 miles. The main fields are in the “southern tier,” from Wayne County to Allen County, including Barren County, and further east in Knox County and Floyd and Knott counties; to the northeast, there's the Ragland field in Bath and Rowan counties along the Licking River. In 1902, the state produced 248,950 barrels of petroleum, valued at $172,837, which was an increase of 81.4% compared to 1901. Kentucky is the southwestern edge of the natural gas region on the west side of the Appalachian system; the most gas is found in Martin County in the east and in Breckinridge County in the northwest. The value of the state’s natural gas production increased from $38,993 in 1891 to $99,000 in 1896, $286,243 in 1900, $365,611 in 1902, and $380,176 in 1907.
Iron ore has been found in several counties, and an iron furnace was built in Bath county, in the N. E. part of the state, as early as 1791, but since 1860 this mineral has received little attention. In 1902 it was mined only in Bath, Lyon and Trigg counties, of which the total product was 71,006 long tons, valued at only $86,169; in 1904 only 35,000 tons were mined, valued at the mines at $35,000.
Iron ore has been discovered in several counties, and an iron furnace was established in Bath County, in the northeastern part of the state, as early as 1791. However, since 1860, this mineral has not been given much attention. In 1902, it was only mined in Bath, Lyon, and Trigg counties, with a total production of 71,006 long tons, valued at just $86,169; in 1904, only 35,000 tons were mined, worth $35,000 at the mines.
In 1898 there began an increased activity in the mining of fluorspar, and Crittenden, Fayette and Livingston counties produced in 1902, 29,030 tons (valued at $143,410) of this mineral, in 1903 30,835 tons (valued at $153,960) and in 1904 19,096 tons (valued at $111,499), amounts (and values) exceeding those produced in any other state for these years; but in 1907 the quantity (21,058 tons) was less than the output of Illinois. Lead and zinc are mined in small quantities near Marion in Crittenden county and elsewhere in connexion with mining for fluorspar; in 1907 the output was 75 tons of lead valued at $7950 and 358 tons of zinc valued at $42,244. Jefferson, Jessamine, Warren, Grayson and Caldwell counties have valuable quarries of an excellent light-coloured 743 öolitic limestone, resembling the Bedford limestone of Indiana, and best known under the name of the finest variety, the “Bowling Green stone” of Warren county; and sandstones good for structural purposes are found in both coal regions, and especially in Rowan county. In 1907 the total value of limestone quarried in the state was $891,500, and of all stone, $1,002,450. Fire and pottery clay and cement rock also abound within the state. The value of clay products was $2,406,350 in 1905 (when Kentucky was tenth among the states) and was $2,611,364 in 1907 (when Kentucky was eleventh among the states). The manufacture of cement was begun in 1829 at Shippingport, a suburb of Louisville, whence the natural cement of Kentucky and Indiana, produced within a radius of 15 m. from Louisville, is called “Louisville cement.” In 1905 the value of natural cement manufactured in the state (according to the United States Geological Survey) was only $83,000. The manufacture of Portland cement is of greater importance.
In 1898, there was a surge in fluorspar mining, and in 1902, Crittenden, Fayette, and Livingston counties produced 29,030 tons (valued at $143,410) of this mineral. In 1903, they produced 30,835 tons (valued at $153,960), and in 1904, 19,096 tons (valued at $111,499), amounts and values surpassing those from any other state during those years. However, in 1907, the quantity dropped to 21,058 tons, which was less than Illinois's output. Small amounts of lead and zinc are mined near Marion in Crittenden County and in other areas alongside fluorspar mining; in 1907, the output was 75 tons of lead valued at $7,950 and 358 tons of zinc valued at $42,244. Jefferson, Jessamine, Warren, Grayson, and Caldwell counties have valuable quarries of high-quality light-colored oolitic limestone, similar to the Bedford limestone of Indiana, commonly known as the “Bowling Green stone” from Warren County. Good quality sandstones suitable for structural use are also found in both coal regions, particularly in Rowan County. In 1907, the total value of quarried limestone in the state was $891,500, and the total value of all stone was $1,002,450. Fire clay, pottery clay, and cement rock are also abundant in the state. The value of clay products was $2,406,350 in 1905 (placing Kentucky tenth among the states) and rose to $2,611,364 in 1907 (making Kentucky eleventh among the states). The production of cement began in 1829 in Shippingport, a suburb of Louisville, where the natural cement from Kentucky and Indiana, produced within a 15-mile radius of Louisville, is referred to as “Louisville cement.” In 1905, the value of natural cement produced in the state (according to the United States Geological Survey) was only $83,000. The manufacture of Portland cement is more significant.
There are mineral springs, especially salt springs, in various parts of the state, particularly in the Blue Grass Region; these are now of comparatively little economic importance; no salt was reported among the state’s manufactures for 1905, and in 1907 only 736,920 gallons of mineral waters were bottled for sale. Historically and geologically, however, these springs are of considerable interest. According to Professor N. S. Shaler, state geologist in 1873-1880, “When the rocks whence they flow were formed on the Silurian sea-floors, a good deal of the sea-water was imprisoned in the strata, between the grains of sand or mud and in the cavities of the shells that make up a large part of these rocks. This confined sea-water is gradually being displaced by the downward sinking of the rain-water through the rifts of the strata, and thus finds its way to the surface: so that these springs offer to us a share of the ancient seas, in which perhaps a hundred million of years ago the rocks of Kentucky were laid down.” To these springs in prehistoric and historic times came annually great numbers of animals for salt, and in the marshes and swamps around some of them, especially Big Bone Lick (in Boone county, about 20 m. S.W. of Cincinnati) have been found many bones of extinct mammals, such as the mastodon and the long-legged bison.3 The early settlers and the Indians came to the springs to shoot large game for food, and by boiling the waters the settlers obtained valuable supplies of salt. Several of the Kentucky springs have been somewhat frequented as summer resorts; among these are the Blue Lick in Nicholas county (about 48 m. N.E. of Lexington), Harrodsburg, Crab Orchard in Lincoln county (about 115 m. S.E. of Louisville), Rock Castle springs in Pulaski county (about 23 m. E. of Somerset) and Paroquet Springs (near Shepherdsville, Bullitt county), which was a well-known resort before the Civil War, and near which, at Bullitt Lick, the first salt works in Kentucky are said to have been erected.
There are mineral springs, particularly salt springs, found in different parts of the state, especially in the Blue Grass Region; these are now of relatively low economic significance. No salt was reported among the state’s products for 1905, and in 1907, only 736,920 gallons of mineral water were bottled for sale. However, these springs are historically and geologically interesting. According to Professor N. S. Shaler, state geologist from 1873 to 1880, “When the rocks from which they flow were formed on the Silurian sea floors, a good amount of sea water was trapped in the layers, between the grains of sand or mud and in the cavities of the shells that make up a large part of these rocks. This trapped sea water is gradually being replaced by rainwater seeping down through the gaps in the layers, making its way to the surface; thus, these springs give us a glimpse of the ancient seas where the rocks of Kentucky were formed perhaps a hundred million years ago.” Throughout prehistoric and historic times, many animals came to these springs for salt, and in the marshes and swamps around some of them, particularly Big Bone Lick (in Boone County, about 20 miles southwest of Cincinnati), many bones of extinct mammals, such as the mastodon and the long-legged bison, have been discovered. The early settlers and Native Americans visited the springs to hunt large game for food, and by boiling the water, the settlers produced valuable supplies of salt. Several springs in Kentucky have been popular as summer resorts; among these are Blue Lick in Nicholas County (about 48 miles northeast of Lexington), Harrodsburg, Crab Orchard in Lincoln County (about 115 miles southeast of Louisville), Rock Castle Springs in Pulaski County (about 23 miles east of Somerset), and Paroquet Springs (near Shepherdsville, Bullitt County), which was a famous resort before the Civil War, and near which, at Bullitt Lick, the first salt works in Kentucky are said to have been established.
Pearls are found in the state, especially in the Cumberland River, and it is supposed that there are diamonds in the kimberlite deposits in Elliott county.
Pearls are found in the state, especially in the Cumberland River, and it's believed that there are diamonds in the kimberlite deposits in Elliott County.
Transportation.—Kentucky in 1909 had 3,503.98 m. of railway. Railway building was begun in the state in 1830, and in 1835 the first train drawn by a steam locomotive ran from Lexington to Franklin, a distance of 27 m. Not until 1851 was the line completed to Louisville. Kentucky’s trade during the greater part of the 19th century was very largely with the South, and with the facilities which river navigation afforded for this the development of a railway system was retarded. Up to 1880 the railway mileage had increased to only 1,530; but during the next ten years it increased to 2,942, and railways were in considerable measure substituted for water craft. The principal lines are the Louisville & Nashville, the Chesapeake & Ohio, the Illinois Central, and the Cincinnati Southern (Queen & Crescent route). Most of the lines run south or south-west from Cincinnati and Louisville, and the east border of the state still has a small railway mileage and practically no wagon roads, most of the travel being on horseback. The wagon roads of the Blue Grass Region are excellent, because of the plentiful and cheap supply of stone for road building. The assessment of railway property, and in some measure the regulation of railway rates, are entrusted to a state railway commission.
Transportation.—In 1909, Kentucky had 3,503.98 miles of railway. The state began building railways in 1830, and in 1835, the first train pulled by a steam locomotive traveled from Lexington to Franklin, covering a distance of 27 miles. It wasn't until 1851 that the line was completed to Louisville. For much of the 19th century, Kentucky's trade was primarily with the South, and the development of a railway system was slowed down by the advantages of river navigation. By 1880, the railway mileage had only increased to 1,530 miles; however, in the following decade, it jumped to 2,942 miles, with railways largely replacing watercraft. The main railway lines include the Louisville & Nashville, Chesapeake & Ohio, Illinois Central, and Cincinnati Southern (Queen & Crescent route). Most lines run south or southwest from Cincinnati and Louisville, while the eastern border of the state still has limited railway mileage and almost no wagon roads, with most travel being done on horseback. The wagon roads in the Blue Grass Region are excellent due to the abundant and affordable supply of stone for road construction. The assessment of railway property and some regulation of railway rates are handled by a state railway commission.
Population.—The population of Kentucky in 18804 was 1,648,690; in 1890, 1,858,635, an increase within the decade of 12.7 %; in 1900 it was 2,147,174; and in 1910 it had reached 2,289,905. Of the total population of 1900, 284,865 were coloured and 50,249 were foreign-born; of the coloured, 284,706 were negroes, 102 were Indians, and 57 were Chinese; of the foreign-born, 27,555 were natives of Germany, 9874 were natives of Ireland, and 3256 were natives of England. Of the foreign-born, 21,427, or 42.6 %, were inhabitants of the city of Louisville, leaving a population outside of this city of which 98.4 % were native born. The rugged east section of the state, a part of Appalachian America, is inhabited by a people of marked characteristics, portrayed in the fiction of Miss Murfree (“Charles Egbert Craddock”) and John Fox, Jr. They are nearly all of British—English and Scotch-Irish—descent, with a trace of Huguenot. They have good native ability, but through lack of communication with the outside world their progress has been retarded. Before the Civil War they were owners of land, but for the most part not owners of slaves, so that a social and political barrier, as well as the barriers of nature, separated them from the other inhabitants of the state. In their speech several hundred words persist which elsewhere have been obsolete for three centuries or occur only in dialects in England. Their life is still in many respects very primitive; their houses are generally built of logs, their clothes are often of homespun, Indian corn and ham form a large part of their diet, and their means of transportation are the saddle-horse and sleds and wheeled carts drawn by oxen or mules. In instincts and in character, also, the typical “mountaineers” are to a marked degree primitive; they are, for the most part, very ignorant; they are primitively hospitable and are warm-hearted to friends and strangers, but are implacable in their enmities and are prone to vendettas and family feuds, which often result in the killing in open fight or from ambush of members of one faction by members of another; and their relative seclusion and isolation has brought them, especially in some districts, to a disregard for law, or to a belief that they must execute justice with their own hands. This appears particularly in their attitude toward revenue officers sent to discover and close illicit stills for the distilling from Indian corn of so-called “moon-shine” whisky (consisting largely of pure alcohol). The taking of life and “moon-shining,” however, have become less and less frequent among them, and Berea College, at Berea, the Lincoln Memorial University, and other schools in Kentucky and adjoining states have done much to educate them and bring them more in harmony with the outside community.
Population.—The population of Kentucky in 1880 was 1,648,690; in 1890, it was 1,858,635, an increase of 12.7% over the decade; in 1900 it was 2,147,174; and by 1910 it had reached 2,289,905. Of the total population in 1900, 284,865 were people of color and 50,249 were foreign-born; among the people of color, 284,706 were Black, 102 were Native Americans, and 57 were Chinese; among the foreign-born, 27,555 were from Germany, 9,874 were from Ireland, and 3,256 were from England. Of the foreign-born population, 21,427, or 42.6%, lived in the city of Louisville, leaving a population outside of this city that was 98.4% native-born. The rugged eastern section of the state, part of Appalachian America, is home to a people with distinct characteristics, depicted in the fiction of Miss Murfree (“Charles Egbert Craddock”) and John Fox, Jr. They are mostly of British—English and Scotch-Irish—descent, with some Huguenot ancestry. They possess natural ability, but due to limited communication with the outside world, their progress has been slowed. Before the Civil War, they owned land but mostly did not own slaves, which created both social and political barriers, as well as barriers imposed by nature, separating them from other residents of the state. In their speech, several hundred words have survived that are obsolete elsewhere for three centuries or exist only in local dialects in England. Their way of life is still very primitive in many respects; their homes are typically made of logs, their clothing is often handmade, and their diet consists largely of corn and ham, while their transportation is by saddle-horses, sleds, and carts drawn by oxen or mules. In instincts and character, the typical “mountaineers” are quite primitive; they are largely uneducated, hospitable, and warm-hearted towards friends and strangers, but they can be relentless in their grudges and have a tendency toward vendettas and family feuds, which often lead to violent confrontations. Their relative separation and isolation have led, especially in some areas, to a disregard for the law or a belief that they need to enforce justice themselves. This is especially evident in their attitudes toward revenue officers sent to find and shut down illegal distilleries producing “moonshine” whisky (which is mainly pure alcohol). However, incidents of violence and moonshining have become less common among them, and Berea College, Lincoln Memorial University, and other schools in Kentucky and neighboring states have significantly helped educate them and connect them more with the broader community.
The population of Kentucky is largely rural. However, in the decade between 1890 and 1900 the percentage of urban population (i.e. population of places of 4000 inhabitants or more) to the total population increased from 17.5 to 19.7 and the percentage of semi-urban (i.e. population of incorporated places with a population of less than 4000) to the total increased from 8.86 to 9.86 %; but 48.3 % of the urban population of 1900 was in the city of Louisville. In 1910 the following cities each had a population of more than 5000. Louisville (223,928), Covington (53,270), Lexington (35,099), Newport (30,309), Paducah (22,760), Owensboro (16,011), Henderson (11,452), Frankfort, the capital (10,465), Hopkinsville (9419), Bowling Green (9173), Ashland (8688), Middlesboro (7305), Winchester (7156), Dayton (6979), Bellevue (6683), Maysville (6141), Mayfield (5916), Paris (5859), Danville (5420), Richmond (5340). Of historical interest are Harrodsburg (q.v.), the first permanent settlement in the state, and Bardstown (pop. in 1900, 1711), the county-seat of Nelson county. Bardstown was settled about 1775, largely by Roman Catholics from Maryland. It was the see of a Roman Catholic bishop from 1810 to 1841, and the seat of St Joseph’s College (Roman Catholic) from 1824 to 1890; and was for some time the home of John Fitch (1743-1798), the inventor, who built his first boat here. The Nazareth Literary and Benevolent Institution, at Nazareth (2 m. N. of Bardstown), was founded in 1829 and is a well-known Roman Catholic school for girls. Boonesborough, founded by Daniel Boone in 1775, in what is now Madison county, long ago ceased to exist, though a railway station named Boone, on the Louisville & Nashville railroad, is near the site of the old settlement.
The population of Kentucky is mostly rural. However, in the decade between 1890 and 1900, the percentage of urban population (that is, people living in places with 4,000 or more residents) increased from 17.5% to 19.7%, and the percentage of semi-urban population (defined as people living in incorporated places with a population of less than 4,000) rose from 8.86% to 9.86%. Notably, 48.3% of the state's urban population in 1900 lived in the city of Louisville. By 1910, the following cities each had populations of over 5,000: Louisville (223,928), Covington (53,270), Lexington (35,099), Newport (30,309), Paducah (22,760), Owensboro (16,011), Henderson (11,452), Frankfort, the capital (10,465), Hopkinsville (9,419), Bowling Green (9,173), Ashland (8,688), Middlesboro (7,305), Winchester (7,156), Dayton (6,979), Bellevue (6,683), Maysville (6,141), Mayfield (5,916), Paris (5,859), Danville (5,420), and Richmond (5,340). Of historical significance are Harrodsburg (see entry), the first permanent settlement in the state, and Bardstown (population in 1900, 1,711), the county seat of Nelson County. Bardstown was settled around 1775, mainly by Roman Catholics from Maryland. It served as the seat of a Roman Catholic bishop from 1810 to 1841 and was home to St. Joseph’s College (a Roman Catholic institution) from 1824 to 1890. It was also the residence of John Fitch (1743-1798), the inventor who built his first boat there. The Nazareth Literary and Benevolent Institution, located in Nazareth (2 miles north of Bardstown), was established in 1829 and is a well-known Roman Catholic school for girls. Boonesborough, founded by Daniel Boone in 1775 in what is now Madison County, has long since disappeared, although a railway station named Boone, located on the Louisville & Nashville railroad, is near the site of the former settlement.
In 1906 there were 858,324 communicants of different religious denominations in the state, including 311,583 Baptists, 165,908 Roman Catholics, 156,007 Methodists, 136,110 Disciples of Christ, 47,822 Presbyterians and 8091 Protestant Episcopalians.
In 1906, there were 858,324 members of various religious denominations in the state, including 311,583 Baptists, 165,908 Roman Catholics, 156,007 Methodists, 136,110 Disciples of Christ, 47,822 Presbyterians, and 8,091 Protestant Episcopalians.
Administration.—Kentucky is governed under a constitution adopted in 1891.5 A convention to revise the constitution or to draft a new one meets on the call of two successive legislatures, ratified by a majority of the popular vote, provided that majority be at least one-fourth of the total number of votes cast at the preceding general election. Ordinary amendments are proposed by a three-fifths majority in each house, and are also subject to popular approval. With the usual exceptions of criminals, 744 idiots and insane persons, all male citizens of the United States, who are at least 21 years of age, and have lived in the state one year, in the county six months, and in the voting precinct sixty days next preceding the election, are entitled to vote. The legislature provides by law for registration in cities of the first, second, third and fourth classes—the minimum population for a city of the fourth class being 3000. Corporations are forbidden to contribute money for campaign purposes on penalty of forfeiting their charters, or, if not chartered in the state, their right to carry on business in the state. The executive is composed of a governor, a lieutenant-governor, a treasurer, an auditor of public accounts, a register of the land office, a commissioner of agriculture, labour, and statistics, a secretary of state, an attorney-general and a superintendent of public instruction. All are chosen by popular vote for four years and are ineligible for immediate re-election, and each must be at least 30 years of age and must have been a resident citizen of the state for two years next preceding his election. If a vacancy occurs in the office of governor during the first two years a new election is held; if it occurs during the last two years the lieutenant-governor serves out the term. Lieutenant-governor Beckham, elected in 1900 to fill out the unexpired term of Governor Goebel (assassinated in 1900), was re-elected in 1903, the leading lawyers of the state holding that the constitutional inhibition on successive terms did not apply in such a case.
Administration.—Kentucky is governed by a constitution adopted in 1891.5 A convention to revise the constitution or create a new one meets upon the call of two consecutive legislatures, ratified by a majority of the popular vote, as long as that majority is at least one-fourth of the total votes cast in the previous general election. Ordinary amendments are proposed by a three-fifths majority in each house and are also subject to popular approval. With the usual exceptions of criminals, individuals with intellectual disabilities, and those deemed insane, all male citizens of the United States who are at least 21 years old and have lived in the state for one year, in the county for six months, and in the voting precinct for sixty days before the election are eligible to vote. The legislature establishes laws for registration in cities of the first, second, third, and fourth classes—the minimum population for a fourth-class city being 3,000. Corporations are prohibited from contributing money for campaign purposes, with the penalty of losing their charters or, if not chartered in the state, their right to operate in the state. The executive branch consists of a governor, a lieutenant governor, a treasurer, an auditor of public accounts, a register of the land office, a commissioner of agriculture, labor, and statistics, a secretary of state, an attorney general, and a superintendent of public instruction. All are elected by popular vote for four years and cannot be re-elected immediately; each must be at least 30 years old and must have been a resident citizen of the state for two years prior to their election. If a vacancy arises in the governor's office during the first two years, a new election is held; if it occurs during the last two years, the lieutenant governor completes the term. Lieutenant Governor Beckham, elected in 1900 to finish the term of Governor Goebel (who was assassinated in 1900), was re-elected in 1903, as leading attorneys in the state argued that the constitutional restriction on successive terms did not apply in this instance.
The governor is commander-in-chief of the militia when it is not called into the service of the United States; he may remit fines and forfeitures, commute sentences, and grant reprieves and pardons, except in cases of impeachment; and he calls extraordinary sessions of the legislature. His control of patronage, however, is not extensive and his veto power is very weak. He may veto any measure, including items in appropriation bills, but the legislature can repass such a measure by a simple majority of the total membership in each house. Among the various state administrative boards are the board of equalization of five members, the board of health of nine members, a board of control of state institutions with four members (bipartisan), and the railroad commission, the prison commission, the state election commission and the sinking fund commission of three members each. Legislative power is vested in a General Assembly, which consists of a Senate and a House of Representatives. Senators are elected for four years, one-half retiring every two years; representatives are elected for two years. The minimum age for a representative is 24 years, for a senator 30 years. There are thirty-eight senators and one hundred representatives. The Senate sits as a court for the trial of impeachment cases. A majority of either house constitutes a quorum, but as regards ordinary bills, on the third reading, not only must they receive a majority of the quorum, but that majority must be at least two-fifths of the total membership of the house. For the enactment of appropriation bills and bills creating a debt a majority of the total membership in each house is required. All revenue measures must originate in the House of Representatives, but the Senate may introduce amendments. There are many detailed restrictions on local and special legislation. The constitution provides for local option elections on the liquor question in counties, cities, towns and precincts; in 1907, out of 119 counties 87 had voted for prohibition.
The governor is the commander-in-chief of the militia when it’s not called into service by the United States. He can cancel fines and forfeitures, reduce sentences, and grant temporary relief and pardons, except in cases of impeachment. He also calls special sessions of the legislature. However, his control over appointments is limited, and his veto power is quite weak. He can veto any legislation, including parts of budget bills, but the legislature can override that veto with a simple majority from all members in each house. Among the various state administrative boards are the five-member Board of Equalization, the nine-member Board of Health, a four-member bipartisan Board of Control for state institutions, and the three-member Railroad Commission, Prison Commission, State Election Commission, and Sinking Fund Commission. Legislative power lies with a General Assembly, which includes a Senate and a House of Representatives. Senators serve four-year terms, with half of them rotating out every two years; representatives serve two-year terms. The minimum age to be a representative is 24 years, and for a senator, it’s 30 years. There are thirty-eight senators and one hundred representatives. The Senate serves as a court for impeachment trials. A majority from either house makes up a quorum, but for regular bills on their third reading, they need a majority of the quorum, and that majority has to be at least two-fifths of the total membership. For passing budget bills and those creating debt, a majority of all members in each house is required. All revenue legislation must start in the House of Representatives, though the Senate can introduce amendments. There are strict rules regarding local and special legislation. The constitution allows local option elections on liquor issues in counties, cities, towns, and precincts; in 1907, out of 119 counties, 87 voted for prohibition.
The judiciary consists of a court of appeals, circuit courts, quarterly courts, county courts, justice of the peace courts, police courts and fiscal courts. The court of appeals is composed of from five to seven judges (seven in 1909), elected, one from each appellate district, for a term of eight years. The senior judge presides as chief justice and in case two or more have served the same length of time one of them is chosen by lot. The governor may for any reasonable cause remove judges on the address of two-thirds of each house of the legislature. The counties are grouped into judicial circuits, those containing a population of more than 150,000 constituting separate districts; each district has a judge and a commonwealth’s attorney. The county officials are the judge, clerk, attorney, sheriff, jailor, coroner, surveyor and assessor, elected for four years. Each county contains from three to eight justice of the peace districts. The financial board of the county is composed of the county judge and the justices of the peace, or of the county judge and three commissioners elected on a general ticket.
The judiciary is made up of a court of appeals, circuit courts, quarterly courts, county courts, justice of the peace courts, police courts, and fiscal courts. The court of appeals has between five to seven judges (seven in 1909), elected from each appellate district, serving an eight-year term. The senior judge acts as the chief justice, and if two or more judges have served for the same amount of time, one is chosen by lot. The governor can remove judges for valid reasons with the approval of two-thirds of each house of the legislature. Counties are organized into judicial circuits, with those having populations over 150,000 forming separate districts; each district has a judge and a commonwealth’s attorney. County officials include the judge, clerk, attorney, sheriff, jailer, coroner, surveyor, and assessor, all elected for four years. Each county has between three to eight justice of the peace districts. The county's financial board consists of the county judge and the justices of the peace, or the county judge and three commissioners elected on a general ticket.
The municipalities are divided into six classes according to population, a classification which permits considerable special local legislation in spite of the constitutional inhibition. Marriages between whites and persons of negro descent are prohibited by law, and a marriage of insane persons is legally void. Among causes for absolute divorce are adultery, desertion for one year, habitual drunkenness for one year, cruelty, ungovernable temper, physical incapacity at time of marriage, and the joining by either party of any religious sect which regards marriage as unlawful. A homestead law declares exempt from execution an unmortgaged dwelling-house (with appurtenances) not to exceed $1000 in value, and certain property, such as tools of one’s trade, libraries (to the value of $500) of ministers and lawyers, and provisions for one year for each member of a family. Child labour is regulated by an act passed by the General Assembly in 1908; this act prohibits the employment of children less than 14 years of age in any gainful occupation during the session of school or in stores, factories, mines, offices, hotels or messenger service during vacations, and prohibits the employment of children between 14 and 16 unless they have employment certificates issued by a superintendent of schools or some other properly authorized person, showing the child’s ability to read and write English, giving information as to the child’s age (based upon a birth certificate if possible), and identifying the child by giving height and weight and colour of eyes and hair. These certificates must be kept on file and lists of children employed must be posted by employers; labour inspectors receive monthly lists from local school boards of children receiving certificates; and children under 16 are not to work more than 10 hours a day or 60 hours a week, or between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m.
The municipalities are divided into six classes based on population, a classification that allows for significant local legislation despite constitutional restrictions. Laws prohibit marriages between white individuals and those of Black descent, and marriages between individuals who are mentally ill are legally invalid. Grounds for absolute divorce include adultery, desertion for one year, habitual drunkenness for one year, cruelty, uncontrollable temper, physical incapacity at the time of marriage, and either party joining a religious sect that views marriage as invalid. A homestead law states that an unmortgaged home (and its associated property) valued at no more than $1,000 is exempt from execution, along with certain items such as tools for one’s trade, libraries (valued at up to $500) of ministers and lawyers, and a year’s worth of provisions for every family member. Child labor is regulated by a law passed by the General Assembly in 1908, which bans the employment of children under 14 years old in any work that earns money during school sessions or in stores, factories, mines, offices, hotels, or messenger services during vacations. It also prohibits employing children aged 14 to 16 unless they have employment certificates issued by a school superintendent or other authorized person, which must show the child’s ability to read and write English, give details about the child’s age (preferably based on a birth certificate), and identify the child by height, weight, and eye and hair color. These certificates must be kept on file, and employers must post lists of employed children. Labor inspectors receive monthly lists from local school boards of children who have received certificates, and children under 16 cannot work more than 10 hours a day or 60 hours a week, nor between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m.
Charitable and Penal Institutions.—The charitable and penal institutions are managed by separate boards of trustees appointed by the governor. There are a deaf and dumb institution at Danville (1823), an institution for the blind at Louisville (1842), and an institution for the education of feeble-minded children at Frankfort (1860). The Eastern Lunatic Asylum at Lexington, established in 1815 as a private institution, came under the control of the state in 1824. The Central Lunatic Asylum at Anchorage, founded in 1869 as a house of refuge for young criminals, became an asylum in 1873. The Western Lunatic Asylum at Hopkinsville was founded in 1848. The main penitentiary at Frankfort was completed in 1799 and a branch was established at Eddyville in 1891. Under an act of 1898 two houses of reform for juvenile offenders, one for boys, the other for girls, were established near Lexington.
Charitable and Penal Institutions.—The charitable and penal institutions are run by separate boards of trustees appointed by the governor. There’s a school for the deaf and hard of hearing in Danville (1823), a school for the blind in Louisville (1842), and an institution for the education of children with intellectual disabilities in Frankfort (1860). The Eastern Lunatic Asylum in Lexington, established in 1815 as a private facility, came under state management in 1824. The Central Lunatic Asylum in Anchorage, founded in 1869 as a refuge for young criminals, became an asylum in 1873. The Western Lunatic Asylum in Hopkinsville was established in 1848. The main prison in Frankfort was completed in 1799, and a branch was opened in Eddyville in 1891. Under a law passed in 1898, two reform houses for juvenile offenders were established near Lexington, one for boys and the other for girls.
Education.—The early history of the schools of Kentucky shows that the rural school conditions have been very unsatisfactory. A system of five trustees, with a sixty-day term of school, was replaced by a three trustee system, first with a one-hundred-day term of school, and subsequently with a one-hundred-and-twenty-day term of school annually. The state fund has not been supplemented locally for the payment of teachers, who have consequently been underpaid. The rural teachers, however, have been paid from the state fund, so that the poorer districts receive aid from the richer districts of the commonwealth. The rural schools are supervised by a superintendent in each county. Throughout the state white and negro children are taught in separate schools. The state makes provision for revenue for school purposes as follows: (1) the interest on the Bond of the Commonwealth for $1,327,000.00; (2) dividends on 798 shares of the capital stock of the Bank of Kentucky—representing a par value of $79,800.00; (3) the interest at 6 % on the Bond of the Commonwealth for $381,986.08, which is a perpetual obligation in favour of the several counties; (4) the interest at 6 % on $606,641.03, which was received from the United States; (5) the annual tax of 26½ cents on each $100 of value of all real and personal estate and corporate franchises directed to be assessed for taxation; (6) a certain portion of fines, forfeitures and licences realized by the state; and (7) a portion of the dog taxes of each county. The present school system of Kentucky may be summarized under three heads: the rural schools, the graded schools, and the high schools (which are further classified as city and county high schools). The 1908 session of the General Assembly passed an act providing: that each county of the state be the unit for taxation; that the county tax be mandatory; that there be a local subdistrict tax; and that each county be divided into four, six or eight educational divisions, that one trustee be elected for each subdistrict, that the trustees of the subdistricts form division Boards of Education, and that the chairmen of these various division boards form a County Board of Education together with the county superintendent, who is ex officio chairman. This system of taxation and supervision is a great advance in the administration of public schools. Any subdistrict, town or city of the fifth or sixth class may provide for a graded school by voting for an ad valorem and poll tax which is limited as to amount. There were in 1909 135 districts which had complied with this act, and were known as Graded Common School districts. By special charters the General Assembly has also established 25 special graded schools. Statutes provide that all children between the ages of 7 and 14 years living in such districts must attend school annually for at least eight consecutive weeks. In each city of the first, second and third class there must be, and of the fourth class there may be, maintained under control of a city Board of Education a system of public schools, in which all children between the ages of 6 and 20 residing in the city may be taught at public expense. There were in 1909 62 city public high schools whose graduates are admitted to the State University without examination. A truancy act (1908) provides that every child between the ages of 7 and 14 years living in a city of the first, second, third or fourth class must attend school regularly for the full term of said school. It was provided by statute that before June 1910, 745 there should have been established in each county of the state at least one County High School to which all common school graduates of the county should be admitted without charge. Separate institutes for white and coloured teachers are conducted annually in each county. These institutes are held for a five or ten day session and attendance is required of every teacher. The state provides for the issuance of three kinds of certificates. A state diploma issued by the State Board of Examiners is good for life. A state certificate issued by the State Board of Examiners is good for eight years with one renewal. County certificates issued by the County Board of Examiners are of three classes, valid for one, two and four years respectively.
Education.—The early history of the schools in Kentucky shows that rural school conditions have been very poor. A system of five trustees, with a sixty-day school term, was replaced by a three-trustee system, first with a one-hundred-day school term, and later with a one-hundred-and-twenty-day term each year. The state fund hasn't been supplemented locally for paying teachers, who have therefore been underpaid. However, rural teachers have been paid from the state fund, which means poorer districts receive support from wealthier districts in the commonwealth. Each county has a superintendent overseeing the rural schools. Throughout the state, white and Black children are taught in separate schools. The state provides revenue for school purposes as follows: (1) interest on the Bond of the Commonwealth for $1,327,000.00; (2) dividends on 798 shares of the capital stock of the Bank of Kentucky—representing a par value of $79,800.00; (3) interest at 6% on the Bond of the Commonwealth for $381,986.08, which is a perpetual obligation benefiting several counties; (4) interest at 6% on $606,641.03 received from the United States; (5) an annual tax of 26½ cents on every $100 of value of all real and personal property and corporate franchises designated for taxation; (6) a portion of fines, forfeitures and licenses collected by the state; and (7) a share of the dog taxes from each county. The current school system of Kentucky can be summarized under three categories: rural schools, graded schools, and high schools (further classified as city and county high schools). The 1908 session of the General Assembly passed a law stating that each county in the state be a unit for taxation; that county taxes be mandatory; that a local subdistrict tax be established; and that each county be divided into four, six, or eight educational divisions, with one trustee elected for each subdistrict. The trustees of the subdistricts form division Boards of Education, and the chairpersons of these division boards form a County Board of Education along with the county superintendent, who serves as the ex officio chairperson. This system of taxation and supervision is a significant improvement in public school administration. Any subdistrict, town, or city of the fifth or sixth class can establish a graded school by voting for an ad valorem and poll tax with a limit on the amount. In 1909, there were 135 districts that complied with this law and were known as Graded Common School districts. Through special charters, the General Assembly also established 25 special graded schools. Statutes require that all children between the ages of 7 and 14 living in such districts must attend school annually for at least eight consecutive weeks. In each city of the first, second, and third class there must be, and in the fourth class there may be, a system of public schools maintained under the control of a city Board of Education, where all children between the ages of 6 and 20 residing in the city can be educated at public expense. In 1909, there were 62 city public high schools whose graduates are admitted to the State University without examination. A truancy law (1908) states that every child between 7 and 14 years old living in a city of the first, second, third, or fourth class must attend school regularly for the entire school term. The statute provided that by June 1910, 745 there should be at least one County High School established in each county where all common school graduates from the county can attend for free. Separate institutes for white and Black teachers are held annually in each county. These institutes last for five to ten days and attendance is mandatory for every teacher. The state issues three types of certificates. A state diploma issued by the State Board of Examiners is valid for life. A state certificate from the State Board of Examiners is valid for eight years with one renewal. County certificates issued by the County Board of Examiners come in three classes, valid for one, two, and four years, respectively.
According to a school census there was in 1908-1909 a school population of 739,352, of which 587,051 were reported from the rural districts. In the school year 1907-1908 the school population was 734,617, the actual enrolment in public schools was 441,377, the average attendance was 260,843; there were approximately 3392 male and 5257 female white teachers and 1274 negro teachers; and the total revenue for school purposes was $3,805,997, of which sum $2,437,942.56 came from the state treasury.
According to a school census, in the 1908-1909 school year, there was a total school population of 739,352, with 587,051 reported from rural areas. In the 1907-1908 school year, the school population was 734,617, the actual enrollment in public schools was 441,377, and the average attendance was 260,843. There were about 3,392 male and 5,257 female white teachers, along with 1,274 Black teachers. The total revenue for school purposes was $3,805,997, of which $2,437,942.56 came from the state treasury.
What was formerly the State Agricultural and Mechanical College at Lexington became the State University by legislative enactment (1908); there is no tuition fee except in the School of Law. The State University has a Department of Education. The state maintains for the whites two State Normal Schools, which were established in 1906—one, for the eastern district, at Richmond, and the other, for the western district, at Bowling Green. Under the law establishing State Normal Schools, each county is entitled to one or more appointments of scholarships, one annually for every 500 white school children listed in the last school census. A Kentucky Normal and Industrial School (1886) for negroes is maintained at Frankfort. Among the private and denominational colleges in Kentucky are Central University (Presbyterian), at Danville; Transylvania University, at Lexington; Georgetown College (Baptist) at Georgetown; Kentucky Wesleyan College (M.E. South), at Winchester; and Berea College (non-sectarian) at Berea.
What used to be the State Agricultural and Mechanical College in Lexington became the State University by a law passed in 1908; there’s no tuition fee except for the School of Law. The State University has a Department of Education. The state supports two State Normal Schools for white students, established in 1906—one for the eastern district in Richmond and the other for the western district in Bowling Green. According to the law that set up the State Normal Schools, each county can get one or more scholarship appointments, one for every 500 white school children counted in the last school census. There is also a Kentucky Normal and Industrial School for Black students established in 1886 in Frankfort. Among the private and religious colleges in Kentucky are Central University (Presbyterian) in Danville, Transylvania University in Lexington, Georgetown College (Baptist) in Georgetown, Kentucky Wesleyan College (M.E. South) in Winchester, and Berea College (non-sectarian) in Berea.
Finance.—Kentucky, in common with other states in this part of the country, suffered from over-speculation in land and railways during 1830-1850. The funded debt of the state amounted to four and one-half millions of dollars in 1850, when the hew constitution limited the power of the legislature to contract further obligations or to decrease or misapply the sinking funds. From 1850 to 1880 there was a gradual reduction except during the years of the war. The system of classifying the revenue into separate funds has frequently produced annual deficits, which are, as a rule only nominal, since the total receipts exceed the total expenditures. In 1902 the net bonded debt, exclusive of about two millions of dollars held for educational purposes, was $1,171,394, but this debt was paid in full in the years immediately following. The sinking fund commission is composed of the governor, attorney-general, secretary of state, auditor and treasurer. The first banking currency in Kentucky was issued in 1802 by a co-operative insurance company established by Mississippi Valley traders. The Bank of Kentucky, established at Frankfort in 1806, had a monopoly for several years. In 1818-1819 the legislature chartered 46 banks, nearly all of which went into liquidation during the panic of 1819. The Bank of the Commonwealth was chartered in 1820 as a state institution and the charter of the Bank of Kentucky was revoked in 1822. A court decision denying the legal tender quality of the notes issued by the Bank of the Commonwealth gave rise to a bitter controversy which had considerable influence upon the political history of the state. This bank failed in 1829. In 1834 the legislature chartered the Bank of Kentucky, the Bank of Louisville and the Northern Bank of Kentucky. These institutions survived the panic of 1837 and soon came to be recognized as among the most prosperous and the most conservative banks west of the Alleghanies. The state banking laws are stringent and most of the business is still controlled by banks operating under state charters.
Finance.—Kentucky, like other states in this region, faced issues from excessive speculation in land and railways between 1830 and 1850. By 1850, the state's funded debt reached four and a half million dollars, prompting the new constitution to restrict the legislature's ability to take on new obligations or to reduce or mismanage the sinking funds. From 1850 to 1880, there was a steady reduction in debt, except during the war years. The system of categorizing revenue into separate funds has often led to annual deficits, which are generally just nominal since total receipts exceed total expenditures. In 1902, the net bonded debt, not counting about two million dollars set aside for education, was $1,171,394, but this debt was fully repaid in the years that followed. The sinking fund commission is made up of the governor, attorney-general, secretary of state, auditor, and treasurer. The first banking currency in Kentucky was issued in 1802 by a cooperative insurance company set up by traders from the Mississippi Valley. The Bank of Kentucky, established in Frankfort in 1806, held a monopoly for several years. In 1818-1819, the legislature chartered 46 banks, almost all of which went into liquidation during the panic of 1819. The Bank of the Commonwealth was chartered in 1820 as a state institution, and the charter of the Bank of Kentucky was revoked in 1822. A court ruling that denied the legal tender status of the notes issued by the Bank of the Commonwealth sparked a heated debate that significantly impacted the state's political history. This bank failed in 1829. In 1834, the legislature chartered the Bank of Kentucky, the Bank of Louisville, and the Northern Bank of Kentucky. These institutions survived the panic of 1837 and soon became known as some of the most prosperous and conservative banks west of the Alleghanies. The state banking laws are strict, and most of the banking business is still conducted by banks operating under state charters.
History.—The settlement and the development of that part of the United States west of the Alleghany Mountains has probably been the most notable feature of American history since the close of the Seven Years’ War (1763). Kentucky was the first settlement in this movement, the first state west of the Alleghany Mountains admitted into the Union. In 1763 the Kentucky country was claimed by the Cherokees as a part of their hunting grounds, by the Six Nations (Iroquois) as a part of their western conquests, and by Virginia as a part of the territory granted to her by her charter of 1609, although it was actually inhabited only by a few Chickasaws near the Mississippi river and by a small tribe of Shawnees in the north, opposite what is now Portsmouth, Ohio. The early settlers were often attacked by Indian raiders from what is now Tennessee or from the country north of the Ohio, but the work of colonization would have been far more difficult if those Indians had lived in the Kentucky region itself. Dr Thomas Walker (1715-1794), as an agent and surveyor of the Loyal Land Company, made an exploration in 1750 into the present state from the Cumberland Gap, in search of a suitable place for settlement but did not get beyond the mountain region. In the next year Christopher Gist, while on a similar mission for the Ohio Company, explored the country westward from the mouth of the Scioto river. In 1752 John Finley, an Indian trader, descended the Ohio river in a canoe to the site of Louisville. It was Finley’s descriptions that attracted Daniel Boone, and soon after Boone’s first visit, in 1767, travellers through the Kentucky region became numerous. The first permanent English settlement was established at Harrodsburg in 1774 by James Harrod, and in October of the same year the Ohio Indians, having been defeated by Virginia troops in the battle of Point Pleasant (in what is now West Virginia), signed a treaty by which they surrendered their claims south of the Ohio river. In March 1775 Richard Henderson and some North Carolina land speculators met about 1200 Cherokee Indians in council on the Watauga river and concluded a treaty with them for the purchase of all the territory south of the Ohio river and between the Kentucky and Cumberland rivers. The purchase was named Transylvania, and within less than a month after the treaty was signed, Boone, under its auspices, founded a settlement at Boonesborough which became the headquarters of the colony. The title was declared void by the Virginia government in 1778, but Henderson and his associates received 200,000 acres in compensation, and all sales made to actual settlers were confirmed. During the War of Independence the colonists were almost entirely neglected by Virginia and were compelled to defend themselves against the Indians who were often under British leadership. Boonesborough was attacked in April and in July 1777 and in August 1778. Bryant’s (or Bryan’s) Station, near Lexington, was besieged in August 1782 by about 600 Indians under the notorious Simon Girty, who after raising the siege drew the defenders, numbering fewer than 200, into an ambush and in the battle of Blue Licks which ensued the Kentuckians lost about 67 killed and 7 prisoners. Kentucky county, practically coterminous with the present state of Kentucky and embracing all the territory claimed by Virginia south of the Ohio river and west of Big Sandy Creek and the ridge of the Cumberland Mountains, was one of three counties which was formed out of Fincastle county in 1776. Four years later, this in turn was divided into three counties, Jefferson, Lincoln and Fayette, but the name Kentucky was revived in 1782 and was given to the judicial district which was then organized for these three counties. The War of Independence was followed by an extensive immigration from Virginia, Maryland and North Carolina6 of a population of which fully 95%, excluding negro slaves, were of pure English, Scotch or Scotch-Irish descent. The manners, customs and institutions of Virginia were transplanted beyond the mountains. There was the same political rivalry between the slave-holding farmers of the Blue Grass Region and the “poor whites” of the mountain districts that there was in Virginia between the tide-water planters and the mountaineers. Between these extremes were the small farmers of the “Barrens”7 in Kentucky and of the Piedmont Region in Virginia. The aristocratic influences in both states have always been on the Southern and Democratic side, but while they were strong enough in Virginia to lead the state into secession they were unable to do so in Kentucky.
History.—The settlement and growth of the part of the United States west of the Alleghany Mountains has likely been the most significant aspect of American history since the end of the Seven Years’ War (1763). Kentucky was the first settlement in this movement, becoming the first state west of the Alleghany Mountains to be admitted into the Union. In 1763, the Kentucky region was claimed by the Cherokees as part of their hunting grounds, by the Six Nations (Iroquois) as part of their western conquests, and by Virginia as part of the land granted to her by her 1609 charter, although it was mainly inhabited by a few Chickasaws near the Mississippi River and a small Shawnee tribe in the north, opposite what is now Portsmouth, Ohio. Early settlers often faced attacks from Indian raiders from what is now Tennessee or from areas north of the Ohio, but colonization would have been much harder if those Indians had lived in Kentucky itself. Dr. Thomas Walker (1715-1794), an agent and surveyor for the Loyal Land Company, explored the area in 1750 from the Cumberland Gap, looking for a suitable place to settle, but did not go beyond the mountains. The following year, Christopher Gist, on a similar mission for the Ohio Company, explored westward from the mouth of the Scioto River. In 1752, Indian trader John Finley traveled down the Ohio River in a canoe to the site of Louisville. It was Finley’s accounts that inspired Daniel Boone, and soon after Boone’s initial visit in 1767, travelers through the Kentucky area became numerous. The first permanent English settlement was established at Harrodsburg in 1774 by James Harrod, and in October of that year, the Ohio Indians, defeated by Virginia troops in the battle of Point Pleasant (in present-day West Virginia), signed a treaty surrendering their claims south of the Ohio River. In March 1775, Richard Henderson and some land speculators from North Carolina met about 1200 Cherokee Indians in council on the Watauga River and finalized a treaty to purchase all the land south of the Ohio River between the Kentucky and Cumberland rivers. This purchase was called Transylvania, and less than a month after the treaty was signed, Boone, under its authority, established a settlement at Boonesborough, which later became the colony's headquarters. The title was declared null by the Virginia government in 1778, but Henderson and his partners were compensated with 200,000 acres, and all sales made to actual settlers were validated. During the War of Independence, the colonists were largely ignored by Virginia and had to fend for themselves against Indians often allied with the British. Boonesborough was attacked in April and July 1777, and again in August 1778. Bryant’s (or Bryan’s) Station, near Lexington, was besieged in August 1782 by about 600 Indians led by the infamous Simon Girty, who, after lifting the siege, lured the defenders, numbering fewer than 200, into an ambush; in the subsequent battle of Blue Licks, the Kentuckians lost about 67 killed and 7 captured. Kentucky county, which closely matches the present state of Kentucky and included all the land claimed by Virginia south of the Ohio River and west of Big Sandy Creek and the ridge of the Cumberland Mountains, was one of three counties formed from Fincastle county in 1776. Four years later, it was divided into three counties: Jefferson, Lincoln, and Fayette, but the name Kentucky was revived in 1782 for the judicial district that was then organized for these three counties. The War of Independence was followed by a significant influx of immigrants from Virginia, Maryland, and North Carolina—of a population that was at least 95% of pure English, Scottish, or Scotch-Irish descent, excluding black slaves. The customs, traditions, and institutions of Virginia were transferred beyond the mountains. There was a similar political rivalry between the slaveholding farmers of the Blue Grass Region and the "poor whites" of the mountain areas, just like in Virginia between the tidewater plantation owners and the mountaineers. Between these extremes were the small farmers of the "Barrens" in Kentucky and the Piedmont Region in Virginia. The aristocratic influences in both states have generally aligned with the Southern and Democratic side, but while strong enough in Virginia to push the state into secession, they did not succeed in Kentucky.
At the close of the War of Independence the Kentuckians complained because the mother state did not protect them against their enemies and did not give them an adequate system of local government. Nine conventions were held at Danville from 1784 to 1790 to demand separation from Virginia. The Virginia authorities expressed a willingness to grant the demand provided Congress would admit the new district into the Union as a state. The delay, together with the proposal of John Jay, the Secretary for Foreign Affairs and commissioner to negotiate a commercial treaty with the Spanish envoy, to surrender navigation rights on the lower Mississippi for twenty-five years in order to remove the one obstacle to the negotiations, aroused so much feeling that General James Wilkinson and a few other leaders began to intrigue not only for a separation from Virginia, but also from the United States, and for the formation of a close alliance with the Spanish at New Orleans. Although most of the settlers were too loyal to be led into any such plot they generally agreed that it might have a good effect by bringing pressure to bear upon the Federal government. Congress passed a preliminary act in February 1791, and the state was formally admitted into the Union on the 1st of June 1792. In the Act of 1776 for dividing Fincastle county, Virginia, the ridge of the Cumberland Mountains was named as a part of the east boundary of Kentucky; and now that this ridge had become a part of the boundary between the states of Virginia and Kentucky they, in 1799, appointed a joint commission to run the boundary line on this ridge. A dispute with Tennessee over the southern boundary was settled in a similar manner in 1820.8 The constitution of 1792 provided for manhood suffrage and for the election of the governor and of senators by an electoral college. General Isaac Shelby was the first governor. The people still continued to have troubles with the Indians and with the Spanish at New Orleans. The Federal government was slow to act, but its action when taken was effective. The power of the Indians was overthrown by General Anthony Wayne’s victory in the battle of Fallen Timbers, fought the 20th of August 1794 near the rapids of the Maumee river a few miles above the site of Toledo, Ohio; and the Mississippi question was settled temporarily by the treaty of 1795 and permanently by the purchase of Louisiana in 1803. In 1798-1799 the legislature passed the famous Kentucky Resolutions in protest against the alien and sedition acts.
At the end of the War of Independence, the people in Kentucky were unhappy because Virginia didn’t protect them from their enemies or provide them with a proper local government. From 1784 to 1790, nine conventions were held in Danville to push for independence from Virginia. The authorities in Virginia were open to the idea if Congress would accept the new area as a state. The delay, along with a proposal from John Jay, who was the Secretary for Foreign Affairs and negotiating a commercial treaty with the Spanish envoy, to give up navigation rights on the lower Mississippi for twenty-five years to smooth the negotiations, stirred up so much tension that General James Wilkinson and a few other leaders started to plot not only for separation from Virginia but also from the United States, aiming to form a close alliance with the Spanish in New Orleans. Though most settlers were too loyal to get involved in such a scheme, they generally agreed it could help apply pressure on the Federal government. Congress passed a preliminary act in February 1791, and the state was officially added to the Union on June 1, 1792. The Act of 1776 that divided Fincastle County, Virginia, defined the Cumberland Mountains ridge as part of Kentucky's eastern boundary. Now that this ridge was part of the border between Virginia and Kentucky, in 1799, they appointed a joint commission to survey the boundary line along that ridge. A dispute with Tennessee over the southern boundary was similarly resolved in 1820. 8 The 1792 constitution allowed all men to vote and called for the election of the governor and senators by an electoral college. General Isaac Shelby became the first governor. The settlers continued to face issues with the Indians and the Spanish in New Orleans. The Federal government was slow to respond, but when it did act, it was effective. The power of the Indians was defeated by General Anthony Wayne in the Battle of Fallen Timbers on August 20, 1794, near the rapids of the Maumee River, just a few miles from Toledo, Ohio; and the Mississippi issue was temporarily resolved by the treaty of 1795 and permanently by the purchase of Louisiana in 1803. In 1798-1799, the legislature passed the famous Kentucky Resolutions to protest against the Alien and Sedition Acts.
For several years the Anti-Federalists or Republicans had contended that the administration at Washington had been exercising powers not warranted by the constitution, and when Congress had passed the alien and sedition laws the leaders of that party seized upon the event as a proper occasion for a spirited public protest which took shape principally in resolutions passed by the legislatures of Kentucky and Virginia. The original draft of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 was prepared by Vice-President Thomas Jefferson, although the fact that he was the author of them was kept from the public until he acknowledged it in 1821. They were introduced in the House of Representatives by John Breckinridge on the 8th of November, were passed by that body with some amendments but with only one dissenting vote on the 10th, were unanimously concurred in by the Senate on the 13th, and were approved by Governor James Garrard on the 16th. The first resolution was a statement of the ultra states’-rights view of the relation of the states to the Federal government9 and subsequent resolutions declare the alien and sedition laws unconstitutional and therefore “void and of no force,” principally on the ground that they provided for an exercise of powers which were reserved to the state. The resolutions further declare that “this Commonwealth is determined, as it doubts not its co-states are, tamely to submit to undelegated and therefore unlimited powers in no man or body of men on earth,” and that “these and successive acts of the same character, unless arrested on the threshold, may tend to drive these states into revolution and blood.” Copies of the resolutions were sent to the governors of the various states, to be laid before the different state legislatures, and replies were received from Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Virginia, but all except that from Virginia were unfavourable. Nevertheless the Kentucky legislature on the 22nd of November 1799 reaffirmed in a new resolution the principles it had laid down in the first series, asserting in this new resolution that the state “does now unequivocally declare its attachment to the Union, and to that compact [the Constitution], agreeably to its obvious and real intention, and will be among the last to seek its dissolution,” but that “the principle and construction contended for by sundry of the state legislatures, that the General Government is the exclusive judge of the extent of the powers delegated to it, stop nothing [short] of despotism—since the discretion of those who administer the government, and not the Constitution, would be the measure of their powers,” “that the several states who formed that instrument, being sovereign and independent, have the unquestionable right to judge of the infraction,” and “that a nullification by those sovereignties of all unauthorized acts done under color of that instrument is the rightful remedy.” These measures show that the state was Democratic-Republican in its politics and pro-French in its sympathies, and that it was inclined to follow the leadership of that state from which most of its people had come.
For several years, the Anti-Federalists, or Republicans, argued that the administration in Washington was exercising powers not authorized by the Constitution. When Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts, the leaders of that party took this as an opportunity to launch a strong public protest, primarily through resolutions passed by the legislatures of Kentucky and Virginia. The original draft of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 was written by Vice President Thomas Jefferson, although his authorship remained public knowledge until he admitted it in 1821. They were introduced in the House of Representatives by John Breckinridge on November 8, passed with some amendments but only one dissenting vote on the 10th, unanimously approved by the Senate on the 13th, and signed by Governor James Garrard on the 16th. The first resolution expressed the extreme states’ rights perspective on the relationship between the states and the Federal government, and subsequent resolutions declared the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional and therefore “void and of no force,” mainly because they exercised powers that were reserved for the states. The resolutions also stated that “this Commonwealth is determined, as it doubts not its co-states are, not to submit to undelegated and therefore unlimited powers in any person or group on earth,” and that “these and successive acts of the same kind, unless stopped early, may lead these states into revolution and bloodshed.” Copies of the resolutions were sent to the governors of various states to present to their legislatures, and replies were received from Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia, but all except Virginia's response were unfavorable. However, the Kentucky legislature reaffirmed the principles from the first series in a new resolution on November 22, 1799, stating that the state “does now unequivocally declare its attachment to the Union, and to that compact [the Constitution], according to its clear and true intention, and will be one of the last to seek its dissolution,” but that “the principle and interpretation argued for by several state legislatures, that the General Government is the sole judge of the extent of the powers delegated to it, leads to despotism—since the discretion of those who run the government, and not the Constitution, would determine their powers,” “that the several states who created that document, being sovereign and independent, have the undeniable right to judge violations,” and “that a nullification by those sovereignties of all unauthorized acts done under the guise of that document is the rightful remedy.” These actions show that the state was Democratic-Republican in its politics and pro-French in its sympathies, and that it leaned towards the leadership of the state from which most of its residents had originated.
The constitution of 1799 adopted the system of choosing the governor and senators by popular vote and deprived the supreme court of its original jurisdiction in land cases. The Burr conspiracy (1804-1806) aroused some excitement in the state. Many would have followed Burr in a filibustering attack upon the Spanish in the South-West, but scarcely any would have approved of a separation of Kentucky from the Federal Union. No battles were fought in Kentucky during the War of 1812, but her troops constituted the greater part of the forces under General William Henry Harrison. They took part in the operations at Fort Wayne, Fort Meigs, the river Raisin and the Thames.
The 1799 constitution established a system for electing the governor and senators by popular vote and removed the supreme court's original authority in land cases. The Burr conspiracy (1804-1806) stirred up some excitement in the state. Many people would have supported Burr in a plan to attack the Spanish in the South-West, but almost nobody would have backed Kentucky's separation from the Federal Union. No battles occurred in Kentucky during the War of 1812, but its troops made up a significant portion of the forces led by General William Henry Harrison. They participated in the operations at Fort Wayne, Fort Meigs, the River Raisin, and the Thames.
The Democratic-Republicans controlled the politics of the state without any serious opposition until the conflict in 1820-1826, arising from the demands for a more adequate system of currency and other measures for the relief of delinquent debtors divided the state into what were known as the relief and anti-relief parties. After nearly all the forty-six banks chartered by the legislature in 1818 had been wrecked in the financial panic of 1819, the legislature in 1820 passed a series of laws designed for the benefit of the debtor class, among them one making state bank notes a legal tender for all debts. A decision of the Clark county district court declaring this measure unconstitutional was affirmed by the court of appeals. The legislature in 1824 repealed all of the laws creating the existing court of appeals and then established a new one. This precipitated a bitter campaign 747 between the anti-relief or “old court” party and the relief or “new court” party, in which the former was successful. The old court party followed the lead of Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams in national politics, and became National Republicans and later Whigs. The new court party followed Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren and became Democrats. The electoral vote of the state was cast for Jackson in 1828 and for Clay in 1832. During the next thirty years Clay’s conservative influence dominated the politics of the state.10 Kentucky voted the Whig ticket in every presidential election from 1832 until the party made its last campaign in 1852. When the Whigs were destroyed by the slavery issue some of them immediately became Democrats, but the majority became Americans, or Know-Nothings. They elected the governor in 1855 and almost succeeded in carrying the state for their presidential ticket in 1856. In 1860 the people of Kentucky were drawn toward the South by their interest in slavery and by their social relations, and toward the North by business ties and by a national sentiment which was fostered by the Clay traditions. They naturally assumed the leadership in the Constitutional Union movement of 1860, casting the vote of the state for Bell and Everett. After the election of President Lincoln they also led in the movement to secure the adoption of the Crittenden Compromise or some other peaceful solution of the difficulties between the North and the South.
The Democratic-Republicans ran the state's politics without any serious competition until the conflict from 1820 to 1826. This conflict arose from calls for a better currency system and other measures to help struggling debtors, splitting the state into what were known as the relief and anti-relief parties. After nearly all forty-six banks that were chartered by the legislature in 1818 failed during the financial panic of 1819, the legislature passed several laws in 1820 aimed at helping debtors, including one that made state bank notes legal tender for all debts. A ruling from the Clark County District Court declaring this measure unconstitutional was upheld by the Court of Appeals. In 1824, the legislature repealed all existing laws creating the current Court of Appeals and established a new one. This led to a fierce campaign between the anti-relief, or “old court,” party and the relief, or “new court,” party, with the former coming out on top. The old court party aligned itself with Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams in national politics, becoming National Republicans and later Whigs. The new court party sided with Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren and evolved into Democrats. In the 1828 election, the state voted for Jackson and for Clay in 1832. For the next thirty years, Clay’s conservative influence dominated the state's politics. Kentucky voted for the Whig party in every presidential election from 1832 until they made their last campaign in 1852. When the Whig party was weakened by the slavery issue, some switched to the Democrats, but most became Americans, or Know-Nothings. They elected the governor in 1855 and nearly carried the state for their presidential ticket in 1856. In 1860, the people of Kentucky felt torn between the South due to their interest in slavery and social ties, and the North because of business connections and national sentiment encouraged by Clay's legacy. They naturally took the lead in the Constitutional Union movement of 1860, casting the state's vote for Bell and Everett. After President Lincoln was elected, they also led the push for the Crittenden Compromise or some other peaceful resolution to the tensions between the North and South.
A large majority of the state legislature, however, were Democrats, and in his message to this body, in January 1861, Governor Magoffin, also a Democrat, proposed that a convention be called to determine “the future of Federal and inter-state relations of Kentucky;” later too, in reply to the president’s call for volunteers, he declared, “Kentucky will furnish no troops for the wicked purpose of subduing her sister Southern States.” Under these conditions the Unionists asked only for the maintenance of neutrality, and a resolution to this effect was carried by a bare majority—48 to 47. Some of the secessionists took this as a defeat and left the state immediately to join the Confederate ranks. In the next month there was an election of congressmen, and an anti-secession candidate was chosen in nine out of ten districts. An election in August of one-half the Senate and all of the House of Representatives resulted in a Unionist majority in the new legislature of 103 to 35, and in September, after Confederate troops had begun to invade the state, Kentucky formally declared its allegiance to the Union. From September 1861 to the fall of Fort Donelson in February 1862 that part of Kentucky which is south and west of the Green River was occupied by the Confederate army under General A. S. Johnston, and at Russellville in that district a so-called “sovereignty convention” assembled on the 18th of November. This body, composed mostly of Kentucky men who had joined the Confederate army, passed an ordinance of secession, elected state officers, and sent commissioners to the Confederate Congress, which body voted on the 9th of December to admit Kentucky into the Confederacy. Throughout the war Kentucky was represented in the Confederate Congress—representatives and senators being elected by Confederate soldiers from the state. The officers of this “provisional government,” headed by G. W. Johnson, who had been elected “governor,” left the state when General A. S. Johnston withdrew; Johnson himself was killed at Shiloh, but an attempt was subsequently made by General Bragg to install this government at Frankfort. General Felix K. Zollicoffer (1812-1862) had entered the south-east part of the state through Cumberland Gap in September, and later with a Confederate force of about 7000 men attempted the invasion of central Kentucky, but in October 1861 he met with a slight repulse at Wild Cat Mountain, near London, Laurel county, and on the 19th of January 1862, in an engagement near Mill Springs, Wayne county, with about an equal force under General George H. Thomas, he was killed and his force was utterly routed. In 1862 General Braxton Bragg in command of the Confederates in eastern Tennessee, eluded General Don Carlos Buell, in command of the Federal Army of the Ohio stationed there, and entering Kentucky in August 1862 proceeded slowly toward Louisville, hoping to win the state to the Confederate cause and gain recruits for the Confederacy in the state. His main army was preceded by a division of about 15,000 men under General Edmund Kirby Smith, who on the 30th of August defeated a Federal force under General Wm. Nelson near Richmond and threatened Cincinnati. Bragg met with little opposition on his march, but Buell, also marching from eastern Tennessee, reached Louisville first (Sept. 24), turned on Bragg, and forced him to withdraw. On his retreat, Bragg attempted to set up a Confederate government at Frankfort, and Richard J. Hawes, who had been chosen as G. W. Johnson’s successor, was actually “inaugurated,” but naturally this state “government” immediately collapsed. On the 8th of October Buell and Bragg fought an engagement at Perryville which, though tactically indecisive, was a strategic victory for Buell; and thereafter Bragg withdrew entirely from the state into Tennessee. This was the last serious attempt on a large scale by the Confederates to win Kentucky; but in February 1863 one of General John H. Morgan’s brigades made a raid on Mount Sterling and captured it; in March General Pegram made a raid into Pulaski county; in March 1864 General N. B. Forrest assaulted Fort Anderson at Paducah but failed to capture it; and in June General Morgan made an unsuccessful attempt to take Lexington.
A large majority of the state legislature were Democrats, and in his message to this group in January 1861, Governor Magoffin, also a Democrat, suggested that a convention be called to decide “the future of Federal and interstate relations of Kentucky.” Later, in response to the president's call for volunteers, he declared, “Kentucky will provide no troops for the wicked purpose of defeating her sister Southern States.” Under these circumstances, the Unionists just wanted to maintain neutrality, and a resolution to this effect passed by a narrow margin—48 to 47. Some of the secessionists saw this as a defeat and immediately left the state to join the Confederate ranks. The following month, there was an election for congressmen, and an anti-secession candidate was elected in nine out of ten districts. An election in August for half the Senate and all of the House of Representatives resulted in a Unionist majority in the new legislature of 103 to 35, and in September, after Confederate troops began to invade the state, Kentucky officially declared its loyalty to the Union. From September 1861 until the fall of Fort Donelson in February 1862, the area of Kentucky south and west of the Green River was occupied by the Confederate army under General A. S. Johnston, and at Russellville in that district, a so-called “sovereignty convention” met on November 18. This group, mainly made up of Kentucky men who had joined the Confederate army, passed a secession ordinance, elected state officials, and sent commissioners to the Confederate Congress, which voted on December 9 to admit Kentucky into the Confederacy. Throughout the war, Kentucky was represented in the Confederate Congress—representatives and senators elected by Confederate soldiers from the state. The officers of this “provisional government,” led by G. W. Johnson, who had been elected “governor,” left the state when General A. S. Johnston withdrew; Johnson himself was killed at Shiloh, but General Bragg later attempted to establish this government in Frankfort. General Felix K. Zollicoffer (1812-1862) entered the southeastern part of the state through Cumberland Gap in September and later, with a Confederate force of about 7,000 men, attempted to invade central Kentucky, but in October 1861, he faced a slight setback at Wild Cat Mountain, near London, Laurel County, and on January 19, 1862, during a confrontation near Mill Springs, Wayne County, with about an equal force under General George H. Thomas, he was killed, and his force was completely routed. In 1862, General Braxton Bragg, commanding the Confederates in eastern Tennessee, slipped past General Don Carlos Buell, who led the Federal Army of the Ohio stationed there, and entered Kentucky in August 1862, slowly making his way toward Louisville, hoping to win the state over to the Confederate cause and gain recruits. His main army was preceded by a division of about 15,000 men under General Edmund Kirby Smith, who on August 30 defeated a Federal force under General Wm. Nelson near Richmond and threatened Cincinnati. Bragg encountered little resistance on his march, but Buell, also coming from eastern Tennessee, reached Louisville first (Sept. 24), turned on Bragg, and forced him to withdraw. During his retreat, Bragg tried to establish a Confederate government in Frankfort, and Richard J. Hawes, who had been chosen as G. W. Johnson’s successor, was technically “inaugurated,” but this so-called government quickly fell apart. On October 8, Buell and Bragg fought at Perryville, which, although tactically indecisive, was a strategic victory for Buell; after this, Bragg withdrew completely from the state into Tennessee. This was the last significant large-scale attempt by the Confederates to secure Kentucky; however, in February 1863, one of General John H. Morgan’s brigades raided Mount Sterling and captured it; in March, General Pegram raided Pulaski County; in March 1864, General N. B. Forrest attacked Fort Anderson at Paducah but failed to take it; and in June, General Morgan made an unsuccessful attempt to capture Lexington.
Although the majority of the people sympathized with the Union, the emancipation of the slaves without compensation even to loyal owners, the arming of negro troops, the arbitrary imprisonment of citizens and the interference of Federal military officials in purely civil affairs aroused so much feeling that the state became strongly Democratic, and has remained so almost uniformly since the war. Owing to the panic of 1893, distrust of the free silver movement and the expenditure of large campaign funds, the Republicans were successful in the gubernational election of 1895 and the presidential election of 1896. The election of 1899 was disputed. William S. Taylor, Republican, was inaugurated governor on the 12th of December, but the legislative committee on contests decided in favour of the Democrats. Governor-elect Goebel was shot by an assassin on the 30th of January 1900, was sworn into office on his deathbed, and died on the 3rd of February. Taylor fled the state to escape trial on the charge of murder. Lieutenant-Governor Beckham filled out the unexpired term and was re-elected in 1903. In 1907 the Republicans again elected their candidate for governor.
Although most people supported the Union, the emancipation of the slaves without compensation to even loyal owners, the enlistment of Black troops, the arbitrary imprisonment of citizens, and the interference of federal military officials in civilian matters created such strong feelings that the state became predominantly Democratic, and it has mostly remained that way since the war. Due to the panic of 1893, skepticism about the free silver movement, and the spending of large campaign funds, the Republicans managed to win the gubernatorial election in 1895 and the presidential election in 1896. The election of 1899 was contested. William S. Taylor, a Republican, was sworn in as governor on December 12, but the legislative committee on contests ruled in favor of the Democrats. Governor-elect Goebel was shot by an assassin on January 30, 1900, was sworn into office on his deathbed, and died on February 3. Taylor fled the state to avoid being tried for murder. Lieutenant-Governor Beckham completed the remaining term and was re-elected in 1903. In 1907, the Republicans elected their candidate for governor once again.
Governors of Kentucky
Kentucky Governors
Isaac Shelby | Democratic- | Republican | 1792-1796 |
James Garrard | ” | ” | 1796-1804 |
Christopher Greenup | ” | ” | 1804-1808 |
Charles Scott | ” | ” | 1808-1812 |
Isaac Shelby | ” | ” | 1812-1816 |
George Madison* | ” | ” | 1816 |
Gabriel Slaughter (acting) | ” | ” | 1816-1820 |
John Adair | ” | ” | 1820-1824 |
Joseph Desha | ” | ” | 1824-1828 |
Thomas Metcalfe | National | ” | 1828-1832 |
John Breathitt* | Democrat | 1832-1834 | |
James T. Morehead (acting) | ” | 1834-1836 | |
James Clark* | Whig | 1836 | |
Charles A. Wickliffe (acting) | ” | 1836-1840 | |
Robert P. Letcher | ” | 1840-1844 | |
William Owsley | ” | 1844-1848 | |
John J. Crittenden† | ” | 1848-1850 | |
John L. Helm† | Democrat | 1850-1851 | |
Lazarus W. Powell | ” | 1851-1855 | |
Charles S. Morehead | American | 1855-1859 | |
Beriah Magoffin | Democrat | 1859-1862 | |
James F. Robinson | ” | 1862-1863 | |
Thomas E. Bramlette | ” | 1863-1867 | |
John L. Helm* | ” | 1867 | |
John W. Stevenson‡ | ” | 1867-1871 | |
Preston H. Leslie‡ | ” | 1871-1875 | |
James B. McCreary | ” | 1875-1879 | |
Luke P. Blackburn | ” | 1879-1883 | |
J. Proctor Knott | ” | 1883-1887 | |
Simon B. Buckner | ” | 1887-1891 | |
John Y. Brown | ” | 1891-1895748 | |
William O. Bradley | Republican | 1895-1899 | |
William S. Taylor§ | ” | 1899-1900 | |
William Goebel† | Democrat | 1900 | |
J. C. W. Beckham | ” | 1900-1907 | |
Augustus E. Willson | Republican | 1907- |
* Died in office.
Passed away while in office.
† Governor Crittenden resigned on the 31st of July to become Attorney-General of the United States and John L. Helm served out the unexpired term.
† Governor Crittenden resigned on July 31st to become the Attorney General of the United States, and John L. Helm completed the remaining term.
‡ Governor Stevenson resigned on the 13th of February 1871 to become U.S. Senator from Kentucky. P. H. Leslie filled out the remainder of the term and was elected in 1871 for a full term.
‡ Governor Stevenson resigned on February 13, 1871, to become the U.S. Senator from Kentucky. P. H. Leslie completed the rest of the term and was elected in 1871 for a full term.
§ Taylor’s election was contested by Goebel, who received the certificate of election.
§ Taylor’s election was challenged by Goebel, who was awarded the certificate of election.
Bibliography.—For descriptions of physical features and accounts of natural resources see Reports of the Kentucky Geological Survey, the Biennial Reports of the Bureau of Agriculture, Labor and Statistics, the Reports of the United States Census and various publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, and other publications listed in Bulletin 301 (Bibliography and Index of North American Geology for 1901-1905) and other bibliographies of the Survey. For an early description, see Gilbert Imlay, A Topographical Description of the Western Territory of North America (London, 3rd ed., 1797), in which John Filson’s “Discovery, Settlement and Present State of Kentucke” (1784) is reprinted. For a brief description of the Blue Grass Region, see James Lane Allen’s The Blue Grass Region of Kentucky and other Kentucky Articles (New York, 1900). An account of the social and industrial life of the people in the “mountain” districts is given in William H. Haney’s The Mountain People of Kentucky (Cincinnati, 1906). For administration, see the Official Manual for the Use of the Courts, State and County Officials and General Assembly of the State of Kentucky (Lexington), which contains the Constitution of 1891; The Report of the Debates and Proceedings of the Convention ... of 1849 (Frankfort, 1849); The Official Report of the Proceedings and Debates of the Constitutional Convention of 1890 (4 vols., Frankfort, 1890); B. H. Young, History and Texts of Three Constitutions of Kentucky (Louisville, 1890); J. F. Bullitt and John Feland, The General Statutes of Kentucky (Frankfort and Louisville, 1877, revised editions, 1881, 1887); and the Annual Reports of state officers and boards. For history see R. M. McElroy’s Kentucky in the Nation’s History (New York, 1909, with bibliography); or (more briefly) N. S. Shaler’s Kentucky (Boston, 1885), in the American Commonwealths Series. John M. Brown’s The Political Beginnings of Kentucky (Louisville, 1889) is a good monograph dealing with the period before 1792; it should be compared with Thomas M. Green’s The Spanish Conspiracy: A Review of Early Spanish Movements in the Southwest (Cincinnati, 1891), written in reply to it. Among older histories are Humphrey Marshall, The History of Kentucky ... and the Present State of the Country (2 vols., Frankfort, 1812, 1824), extremely Federalistic in tone; Mann Butler, History of Kentucky from its Exploration and Settlement by the Whites to the close of the Southwestern Campaign of 1813 (Louisville, 1834; 2nd ed., Cincinnati, 1836), and Lewis Collins, The History of Kentucky (2 vols., revised edition, Covington, Ky., 1874), a valuable store-house of facts, the basis of Shaler’s work. E. D. Warfield’s The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 (New York, 2nd ed., 1887) is an excellent monograph. For the Civil War history see “Campaigns in Kentucky and Tennessee,” in the 7th volume of Papers of the Military Historical Society of Massachusetts (Boston, 1908); Thomas Speed, The Union Cause in Kentucky (New York, 1907); Basil W. Duke, History of Morgan’s Cavalry (Cincinnati, 1867), and general works on the history of the war. See also Alvin F. Lewis, History of Higher Education in Kentucky, in Circulars of Information of the U.S. Bureau of Education (Washington, 1899), and R. G. Thwaites, Daniel Boone (New York, 1902). There is much valuable material in the Register (Frankfort, 1903 seq.) of the Kentucky State Historical Society, and especially in the publications of the Filson Club of Louisville. Among the latter are R. T. Durrett’s John Filson, the first Historian of Kentucky (1884); Thomas Speed, The Wilderness Road (1886); W. H. Perrin, The Pioneer Press of Kentucky (1888); G. W. Ranck, Boonesborough: Its Founding, Pioneer Struggles, Indian Experiences, Transylvania Days and Revolutionary Annals (1901), and The Centenary of Kentucky (1892), containing an address, “The State of Kentucky: its Discovery, Settlement, Autonomy and Progress in a Hundred Years,” by Reuben T. Durrett.
References.—For descriptions of physical features and accounts of natural resources, check out Reports of the Kentucky Geological Survey, the Biennial Reports of the Bureau of Agriculture, Labor and Statistics, the Reports from the United States Census, and various publications from the U.S. Geological Survey, along with other works listed in Bulletin 301 (Bibliography and Index of North American Geology for 1901-1905) and other bibliographies of the Survey. For an early description, see Gilbert Imlay’s A Topographical Description of the Western Territory of North America (London, 3rd ed., 1797), which reprints John Filson’s “Discovery, Settlement and Present State of Kentucke” (1784). For a brief look at the Blue Grass Region, see James Lane Allen’s The Blue Grass Region of Kentucky and Other Kentucky Articles (New York, 1900). An account of the social and industrial life of the people in the mountain regions can be found in William H. Haney’s The Mountain People of Kentucky (Cincinnati, 1906). For administrative information, refer to the Official Manual for the Use of the Courts, State and County Officials, and General Assembly of the State of Kentucky (Lexington), which includes the Constitution of 1891; The Report of the Debates and Proceedings of the Convention ... of 1849 (Frankfort, 1849); The Official Report of the Proceedings and Debates of the Constitutional Convention of 1890 (4 vols., Frankfort, 1890); B. H. Young’s History and Texts of Three Constitutions of Kentucky (Louisville, 1890); J. F. Bullitt and John Feland’s The General Statutes of Kentucky (Frankfort and Louisville, 1877, revised editions, 1881, 1887); and the Annual Reports of state officers and boards. For history, see R. M. McElroy’s Kentucky in the Nation’s History (New York, 1909, with bibliography); or (more briefly) N. S. Shaler’s Kentucky (Boston, 1885), part of the American Commonwealths Series. John M. Brown’s The Political Beginnings of Kentucky (Louisville, 1889) is a good monograph covering the period before 1792; it should be compared with Thomas M. Green’s The Spanish Conspiracy: A Review of Early Spanish Movements in the Southwest (Cincinnati, 1891), which was written in response to it. Among older histories are Humphrey Marshall’s The History of Kentucky ... and the Present State of the Country (2 vols., Frankfort, 1812, 1824), which is extremely Federalistic in tone; Mann Butler’s History of Kentucky from its Exploration and Settlement by the Whites to the close of the Southwestern Campaign of 1813 (Louisville, 1834; 2nd ed., Cincinnati, 1836), and Lewis Collins’ The History of Kentucky (2 vols., revised edition, Covington, Ky., 1874), a valuable collection of facts that served as the basis for Shaler’s work. E. D. Warfield’s The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 (New York, 2nd ed., 1887) is an excellent monograph. For Civil War history, see “Campaigns in Kentucky and Tennessee,” in the 7th volume of Papers of the Military Historical Society of Massachusetts (Boston, 1908); Thomas Speed’s The Union Cause in Kentucky (New York, 1907); Basil W. Duke’s History of Morgan’s Cavalry (Cincinnati, 1867), and general works on the history of the war. Also, look at Alvin F. Lewis’ History of Higher Education in Kentucky, in the Circulars of Information of the U.S. Bureau of Education (Washington, 1899), and R. G. Thwaites’ Daniel Boone (New York, 1902). There is a lot of valuable material in the Register (Frankfort, 1903 seq.) of the Kentucky State Historical Society and particularly in the publications of the Filson Club of Louisville. Among these are R. T. Durrett’s John Filson, the First Historian of Kentucky (1884); Thomas Speed’s The Wilderness Road (1886); W. H. Perrin’s The Pioneer Press of Kentucky (1888); G. W. Ranck’s Boonesborough: Its Founding, Pioneer Struggles, Indian Experiences, Transylvania Days and Revolutionary Annals (1901), and The Centenary of Kentucky (1892), which contains an address titled “The State of Kentucky: Its Discovery, Settlement, Autonomy and Progress in a Hundred Years,” by Reuben T. Durrett.
1 North of the Black Patch is a district in which is grown a heavy-leaf tobacco, a large part of which is shipped to Great Britain; and farther north and east a dark tobacco is grown for the American market.
1 North of the Black Patch is an area where a robust variety of tobacco is cultivated, a significant portion of which is exported to Great Britain; and further north and east, a dark tobacco is produced for the American market.
2 In the census of 1905 statistics for other than factory-made products, such as those of the hand trades, were not included.
2 In the 1905 census, statistics for products made by hand, as opposed to factory-made items, were not included.
3 For a full account of the “licks,” see vol. i. pt. ii. of the Memoirs of the Kentucky Geological Survey (1876).
3 For a complete explanation of the “licks,” refer to vol. i. pt. ii. of the Memoirs of the Kentucky Geological Survey (1876).
4 The population of the state at the previous censuses was: 73,677 in 1790; 220,955 in 1800; 406,511 in 1810; 564,317 in 1820; 687,917 in 1830; 779,828 in 1840; 982,405 in 1850; 1,155,684 in 1860 and 1,321,011 in 1870.
4 The population of the state in the previous censuses was: 73,677 in 1790; 220,955 in 1800; 406,511 in 1810; 564,317 in 1820; 687,917 in 1830; 779,828 in 1840; 982,405 in 1850; 1,155,684 in 1860; and 1,321,011 in 1870.
5 There were three previous constitutions—those of 1792, 1799 and 1850.
5 There were three earlier constitutions—those from 1792, 1799, and 1850.
6 Most of the early settlers of Kentucky made their way thither either by the Ohio river (from Fort Pitt) or—the far larger number—by way of the Cumberland Gap and the “Wilderness Road.” This latter route began at Inglis’s Ferry, on the New river, in what is now West Virginia, and proceeded west by south to the Cumberland Gap. The “Wilderness Road,” as marked by Daniel Boone in 1775, was a mere trail, running from the Watauga settlement in east Tennessee to the Cumberland Gap, and thence by way of what are now Crab Orchard, Danville and Bardstown, to the Falls of the Ohio, and was passable only for men and horses until 1795, when the state made it a wagon road. Consult Thomas Speed, The Wilderness Road (Louisville, Ky., 1886), and Archer B. Hulbert, Boone’s Wilderness Road (Cleveland, O., 1903).
6 Most of the early settlers of Kentucky traveled there either by the Ohio River (from Fort Pitt) or—many more—through the Cumberland Gap and the “Wilderness Road.” This latter route started at Inglis’s Ferry, on the New River, in what is now West Virginia, and went southwest to the Cumberland Gap. The “Wilderness Road,” marked by Daniel Boone in 1775, was just a trail that ran from the Watauga settlement in East Tennessee to the Cumberland Gap, and then through what are now Crab Orchard, Danville, and Bardstown, to the Falls of the Ohio. It was only passable for people and horses until 1795 when the state upgraded it to a wagon road. Consult Thomas Speed, The Wilderness Road (Louisville, Ky., 1886), and Archer B. Hulbert, Boone’s Wilderness Road (Cleveland, O., 1903).
7 The “Barrens” were in the north part of the state west of the Blue Grass Region, and were so called merely because the Indians had burned most of the forests here in order to provide better pasturage for buffaloes and other game.
7 The “Barrens” were in the northern part of the state, west of the Blue Grass Region, and got their name because the Native Americans had burned most of the forests in the area to create better grazing land for buffalo and other game.
8 The southern boundary to the Tennessee river was surveyed in 1779-1780 by commissioners representing Virginia and North Carolina, and was supposed to be run along the parallel of latitude 36° 30′, but by mistake was actually run north of that parallel. By a treaty of 1819 the Indian title to the territory west of the Tennessee was extinguished, and commissioners then ran a line along the parallel of 36° 30′ from the Mississippi to the Tennessee. In 1820 commissioners representing Kentucky and Tennessee formally adopted the line of 1779-1780 and the line of 1819 as the boundary between the two states.
8 The southern boundary of the Tennessee River was surveyed in 1779-1780 by commissioners from Virginia and North Carolina. It was meant to run along the latitude line of 36° 30′, but due to a mistake, it ended up being drawn north of that line. In a treaty in 1819, the Indian claim to the land west of the Tennessee River was canceled, and commissioners then drew a boundary along the latitude of 36° 30′ from the Mississippi River to the Tennessee River. In 1820, commissioners from Kentucky and Tennessee officially adopted the boundaries established in 1779-1780 and 1819 as the dividing line between the two states.
9 This resolution read as follows: Resolved, that the several states composing the United States of America are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that by compact under the style of a Constitution for the United States and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes, delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving each state to itself the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force: That to this compact each state acceded as a state, and is an integral party, its co-states forming, as to itself, the other party: That the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself, since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among parties having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.
9 This resolution stated: Resolved, that the various states making up the United States of America are not united under the idea of unlimited submission to their federal government; rather, they established a federal government for specific purposes through a Constitution and its amendments, granting that government certain defined powers while retaining the remaining rights of self-governance for each state. Whenever the federal government takes on powers not delegated to it, its actions are unauthorized, invalid, and have no effect. Each state joined this agreement as an individual state, and together with its co-states, forms the other party. The government created by this agreement was not intended to be the sole or final authority on the scope of its own powers since that would mean its discretion, rather than the Constitution, would define its powers. Instead, in any situation where parties have no common judge, each party has the equal right to determine for itself both the infractions and the method and extent of correction.

KENYA, a great volcanic mountain in British East Africa, situated just south of the equator in 37° 20′ E. It is one of the highest mountains of Africa, its highest peak reaching an altitude of 17,007 ft. (with a possible error of 30 ft. either way). The central core, which consists of several steep pyramids, is that of a very denuded old volcano, which when its crater was complete may have reached 2000 ft. above the present summit. Lavas dip in all directions from the central crystalline core, pointing to the conclusion that the main portion of the mountain represents a single volcanic mass. From the central peaks, of which the axis runs from W.N.W. to S.S.E., ridges radiate outwards, separated by broad valleys, ending upwards in vast cirques. The most important ridges centre in the peak Lenana (16,300 ft.) at the eastern end of the central group, and through it runs the chief water-parting of the mountain, in a generally north to south direction. Three main valleys, known respectively as Hinde, Gorges and Hobley valleys, run down from this to the east, and four—Mackinder, Hausberg, Teleki and Höhnel—to the west. From the central peaks fifteen glaciers, all lying west of the main divide, descend to the north and south, the two largest being the Lewis and Gregory glaciers, each about 1 m. long, which, with the smaller Kolb glacier, lie immediately west of the main divide. Most of the glaciers terminate at an altitude of 14,800-14,900 ft., but the small César glacier, drained to the Hausberg valley, reaches to 14,450. Glaciation was formerly much more extensive, old moraines being observed down to 12,000 ft. In the upper parts of the valleys a number of lakes occur, occupying hollows and rock basins in the agglomerates and ashes, fed by springs, and feeding many of the streams that drain the mountain slopes. The largest of these are Lake Höhnel, lying at an altitude of 14,000 ft., at the head of the valley of the same name, and measuring 600 by 400 yds.; and Lake Michaelson (12,700 ft.?) in the Gorges Valley. At a distance from the central core the radiating ridges become less abrupt and descend with a gentle gradient, finally passing somewhat abruptly, at a height of some 7000 ft., into the level plateau. These outer slopes are clothed with dense forest and jungle, composed chiefly of junipers and Podocarpus, and between 8000 and 9800 ft. of huge bamboos. The forest zone extends to about 10,500 ft., above which is the steeper alpine zone, in which pasturages alternate with rocks and crags. This extends to a general height of about 15,000 ft., but in damp, sheltered valleys the pasturages extend some distance higher. The only trees or shrubs in this zone are the giant Senecio (groundsel) and Lobelia, and tree-heaths, the Senecio forming groves in the upper valleys. Of the fauna of the lower slopes, tracks of elephant, leopard and buffalo have been seen, between 11,500 and 14,500 ft. That of the alpine zone includes two species of dassy (Procavia), a coney (Hyrax), and a rat (Otomys). The bird fauna is of considerable interest, the finest species of the upper zone being an eagle-owl, met with at 14,000 ft. At 11,000 ft. was found a brown chat, with a good deal of white in the tail. Both the fauna and flora of the higher levels present close affinities with those of Mount Elgon, of other mountains of East Africa and of Cameroon Mountain. The true native names of the mountain are said to be Kilinyaga, Doenyo Ebor (white mountain) and Doenyo Egeri (spotted mountain). It was first seen, from a distance, by the missionary Ludwig Krapf in 1849; approached from the west by Joseph Thomson in 1883; partially ascended by Count S. Teleki (1889), J. W. Gregory (1893) and Georg Kolb (1896); and its summit reached by H. J. Mackinder in 1899.
KENYA, is a massive volcanic mountain in British East Africa, located just south of the equator at 37° 20′ E. It is one of Africa's highest mountains, with its peak soaring to an altitude of 17,007 ft. (with a possible error of 30 ft. either way). The central core features several steep pyramids, remnants of an ancient volcano that may have towered 2000 ft. above the current summit when its crater was intact. Lava flows spread out in all directions from the central crystalline core, suggesting that the mountain is a single volcanic structure. From the central peaks, which stretch from W.N.W. to S.S.E., ridges extend outward, separated by wide valleys that culminate in large cirques. The main ridges converge at Peak Lenana (16,300 ft.) at the eastern end of the central group, and the main water divide of the mountain runs through it, generally from north to south. Three significant valleys, known as Hinde, Gorges, and Hobley valleys, extend eastward from this peak, while four others—Mackinder, Hausberg, Teleki, and Höhnel—flow to the west. Fifteen glaciers, all situated west of the main divide, flow north and south from the central peaks, the largest being the Lewis and Gregory glaciers, each about 1 mile long, alongside the smaller Kolb glacier, which lies just west of the main divide. Most glaciers end at altitudes between 14,800 and 14,900 ft., but the smaller César glacier drains into the Hausberg valley and reaches up to 14,450 ft. Glaciation used to be much more widespread, with old moraines observable down to 12,000 ft. In the upper regions of the valleys, several lakes exist, occupying hollows and rock basins in volcanic debris and ash, fed by springs, and supplying many streams that flow down the mountain slopes. The largest of these lakes is Lake Höhnel, located at an altitude of 14,000 ft. at the head of its valley, measuring 600 by 400 yards; and Lake Michaelson (12,700 ft.?) found in the Gorges Valley. As one moves away from the central core, the radiating ridges become less steep and gradually slope down, ultimately transitioning abruptly at around 7,000 ft. into a flat plateau. These outer slopes are covered in dense forests and jungles, primarily consisting of junipers and Podocarpus, along with large bamboos between 8,000 and 9,800 ft. The forest zone extends to about 10,500 ft., above which lies a steeper alpine zone, where pastures alternate with rocky outcrops. This alpine zone generally reaches around 15,000 ft., although in wetter, sheltered valleys, pastures can extend even higher. The only trees or shrubs found in this zone are giant Senecio (groundsel), Lobelia, and tree-heaths, with Senecio often forming groves in the upper valleys. On the lower slopes, tracks of elephants, leopards, and buffalo have been spotted between 11,500 and 14,500 ft. The alpine zone includes two species of dassy (Procavia), a coney (Hyrax), and a rat (Otomys). The birdlife is quite interesting, with the most notable species in the upper zone being an eagle-owl, found at 14,000 ft. At 11,000 ft., a brown chat with a significant amount of white in its tail was discovered. Both the fauna and flora at higher altitudes show close similarities to those of Mount Elgon, other East African mountains, and Cameroon Mountain. The mountain's indigenous names are said to be Kilinyaga, Doenyo Ebor (white mountain), and Doenyo Egeri (spotted mountain). It was first seen from a distance by missionary Ludwig Krapf in 1849, approached from the west by Joseph Thomson in 1883, partially ascended by Count S. Teleki (1889), J. W. Gregory (1893), and Georg Kolb (1896), and its summit reached by H. J. Mackinder in 1899.
See J. W. Gregory, The Great Rift-Valley (London, 1896); H. J. Mackinder, “Journey to the Summit of Mount Kenya,” Geog. Jnl., May 1900.
See J. W. Gregory, The Great Rift-Valley (London, 1896); H. J. Mackinder, “Journey to the Summit of Mount Kenya,” Geog. Jnl., May 1900.

KENYON, LLOYD KENYON, 1st Baron (1732-1802), lord chief-justice of England, was descended by his father’s side from an old Lancashire family; his mother was the daughter of a small proprietor in Wales. He was born at Gredington, Flintshire, on the 5th of October 1732. Educated at Ruthin grammar school, he was in his fifteenth year articled to an attorney at Nantwich, Cheshire. In 1750 he entered at Lincoln’s Inn, London, and in 1756 was called to the bar. As for several years he was almost unemployed, he utilized his leisure in taking notes of the cases argued in the court of King’s Bench, which he afterwards published. Through answering the cases of his friend John Dunning, afterwards Lord Ashburton, he gradually became known to the attorneys, after which his success was so rapid that in 1780 he was made king’s counsel. He showed conspicuous ability in the cross-examination of the witnesses at the trial of Lord George Gordon, but his speech was so tactless that the verdict of acquittal was really due to the brilliant effort of Erskine, the junior counsel. This want of tact, indeed, often betrayed Kenyon into striking blunders; as an advocate he was, 749 moreover, deficient in ability of statement; and his position was achieved chiefly by hard work, a good knowledge of law and several lucky friendships. Through the influence of Lord Thurlow, Kenyon in 1780 entered the House of Commons as member for Hindon, and in 1782 he was, through the same friendship, appointed attorney-general in Lord Buckingham’s administration, an office which he continued to hold under Pitt. In 1784 he received the mastership of the rolls, and was created a baronet. In 1788 he was appointed lord chief justice as successor to Lord Mansfield, and the same year was raised to the peerage as Baron Kenyon of Gredington. As he had made many enemies, his elevation was by no means popular with the bar; but on the bench, in spite of his capricious and choleric temper, he proved himself not only an able lawyer, but a judge of rare and inflexible impartiality. He died at Bath, on the 4th of April 1802. Kenyon was succeeded as 2nd baron by his son George (1776-1855), whose great-grandson, Lloyd (b. 1864), became the 4th baron in 1869.
KENYON, LLOYD KENYON, 1st Baron (1732-1802), chief justice of England, was descended from an old Lancashire family on his father's side; his mother was the daughter of a small landowner in Wales. He was born at Gredington, Flintshire, on October 5, 1732. Educated at Ruthin grammar school, he began an apprenticeship with an attorney in Nantwich, Cheshire, at the age of fifteen. In 1750, he enrolled at Lincoln’s Inn, London, and was called to the bar in 1756. As he struggled to find work for several years, he spent his free time taking notes on cases argued in the court of King’s Bench, which he later published. By answering cases for his friend John Dunning, who later became Lord Ashburton, he gradually became known among attorneys, and by 1780, his career took off, leading him to be appointed king’s counsel. He demonstrated notable skill in cross-examining witnesses during the trial of Lord George Gordon, but his speech was so awkward that the acquittal was largely credited to the impressive work of Erskine, the junior counsel. This lack of tact often led Kenyon to make significant mistakes; as a lawyer, he also struggled with how he expressed his ideas, and his success was primarily due to hard work, solid legal knowledge, and several fortunate connections. Thanks to the influence of Lord Thurlow, Kenyon entered the House of Commons as member for Hindon in 1780, and in 1782, through the same friendship, he was appointed attorney-general in Lord Buckingham’s government, a role he continued under Pitt. In 1784, he became master of the rolls and was made a baronet. In 1788, he was appointed lord chief justice, succeeding Lord Mansfield, and the same year, he was elevated to the peerage as Baron Kenyon of Gredington. Although he had made many enemies, his promotion was not well-received by the bar; however, on the bench, despite his unpredictable and fiery temperament, he proved to be not only a capable lawyer but also a judge of exceptional impartiality. He died in Bath on April 4, 1802. Kenyon was succeeded as 2nd baron by his son George (1776-1855), whose great-grandson, Lloyd (b. 1864), became the 4th baron in 1869.
See Life by Hon. G. T. Kenyon, 1873.
See Life by Hon. G. T. Kenyon, 1873.

KEOKUK, a city of Lee county, Iowa, U.S.A., on the Mississippi river, at the mouth of the Des Moines, in the S.E. corner of the state, about 200 m. above St Louis. Pop. (1900), 14,641; (1905), 14,604, including 1534 foreign-born; (1910), 14,008. It is served by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy, the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific, the Wabash, and the Toledo, Peoria & Western railways. There is a bridge (about 2200 ft. long) across the Mississippi, and another (about 1200 ft. long) across the Des Moines. The city has a public library and St Joseph and Graham hospitals, and is the seat of the Keokuk Medical College (1849). There is a national cemetery here. Much of the city is built on bluffs along the Mississippi. Keokuk is at the foot of the Des Moines Rapids, round which the Federal Government has constructed a navigable canal (opened 1877) about 9 m. long, with a draft at extreme low water of 5 ft.; at the foot a great dam, 1½ m. long and 38 ft. high, has been constructed. Keokuk has various manufactures; its factory product in 1905 was valued at $4,225,915, 38.6% more than in 1900. The city was named after Keokuk, a chief of the Sauk and Foxes (1780-1848), whose name meant “the watchful” or “he who moves alertly.” In spite of Black Hawk’s war policy in 1832 Keokuk was passive and neutral, and with a portion of his nation remained peaceful while Black Hawk and his warriors fought. His grave, surmounted by a monument, is in Rand Park. The first house on the site of the city was built about 1820, but further settlement did not begin until 1836. Keokuk was laid out as a town in 1837, was chartered as a city in 1848, and in 1907 was one of five cities of the state governed by a special charter.
KEOKUK, is a city in Lee County, Iowa, U.S.A., located on the Mississippi River at the mouth of the Des Moines River, in the southeast corner of the state, about 200 miles north of St. Louis. Its population was 14,641 in 1900; 14,604 in 1905, which included 1,534 foreign-born individuals; and 14,008 in 1910. The city is served by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy, the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific, the Wabash, and the Toledo, Peoria & Western railways. There is a bridge (approximately 2,200 feet long) across the Mississippi and another (about 1,200 feet long) across the Des Moines. The city features a public library and two hospitals, St. Joseph and Graham, and is home to the Keokuk Medical College (founded in 1849). There is also a national cemetery here. Much of the city is built on bluffs along the Mississippi. Keokuk is situated at the foot of the Des Moines Rapids, around which the Federal Government constructed a navigable canal (opened in 1877) approximately 9 miles long, with a draft of 5 feet at extreme low water; at the foot, a large dam, 1½ miles long and 38 feet high, has been built. Keokuk has a variety of manufacturing industries, with factory production valued at $4,225,915 in 1905, which was 38.6% more than in 1900. The city was named after Keokuk, a chief of the Sauk and Foxes (1780-1848), whose name means “the watchful” or “he who moves alertly.” Despite Black Hawk’s war policy in 1832, Keokuk remained passive and neutral, and a portion of his nation stayed peaceful while Black Hawk and his warriors fought. His grave, marked by a monument, is located in Rand Park. The first house on the site of the city was built around 1820, but significant settlement did not start until 1836. Keokuk was established as a town in 1837, was chartered as a city in 1848, and in 1907 was one of five cities in the state governed by a special charter.

KEONJHAR, a tributary state of India, within the Orissa division of Bengal; area, 3096 sq. m.; pop. (1901), 285,758; estimated revenue, £20,000. The state is an offshoot from Mayurbhanj. Part of it consists of rugged hills, rising to more than 3000 ft. above sea-level. The residence of the raja is at Keonjhar (pop. 4532).
KEONJHAR,, a tributary state of India located in the Orissa division of Bengal, covers an area of 3,096 square miles and had a population of 285,758 in 1901, with an estimated revenue of £20,000. The state is a branch of Mayurbhanj. Much of the area is made up of rugged hills that rise more than 3,000 feet above sea level. The raja lives in Keonjhar, which has a population of 4,532.

KEONTHAL, a petty hill state in the Punjab, India, with an area of 116 sq. m.; pop. (1901), 22,499; estimated revenue, £4400. The chief, a Rajput, received the title of raja in 1857. After the Gurkha War in 1815, a portion of Keonthal, which had been occupied by the Gurkhas, was sold to the maharaja of Patiala, the remainder being restored to its hereditary chief. In 1823 the district of Punar was added to the Keonthal state. The raja exercises rights of lordship over the petty states of Kothi, Theog, Madhan and Ratesh.
KEONTHAL, is a small hill state in Punjab, India, covering an area of 116 square miles and with a population of 22,499 as of 1901. Its estimated revenue is £4,400. The chief, a Rajput, was given the title of raja in 1857. After the Gurkha War in 1815, part of Keonthal that had been taken by the Gurkhas was sold to the maharaja of Patiala, while the rest was returned to its hereditary chief. In 1823, the district of Punar was added to the Keonthal state. The raja has lordship rights over the small states of Kothi, Theog, Madhan, and Ratesh.

KEPLER, JOHANN (1571-1630), German astronomer, was born on the 27th of December 1571, at Weil, in the duchy of Württemberg, of which town his grandfather was burgomaster. He was the eldest child of an ill-assorted union. His father, Henry Kepler, was a reckless soldier of fortune; his mother, Catherine Guldenmann, the daughter of the burgomaster of Eltingen, was undisciplined and ill-educated. Her husband found campaigning in Flanders under Alva a welcome relief from domestic life; and, after having lost all he possessed by a forfeited security and tried without success the trade of tavern-keeping in the village of Elmendingen, he finally, in 1589, deserted his family. The misfortune and misconduct of his parents were not the only troubles of Kepler’s childhood. He recovered from small-pox in his fourth year with crippled hands and eyesight permanently impaired; and a constitution enfeebled by premature birth had to withstand successive shocks of severe illness. His schooling began at Leonberg in 1577—the year, as he himself tells us, of a great comet; but domestic bankruptcy occasioned his transference to field-work, in which he was exclusively employed for several years. Bodily infirmity, combined with mental aptitude, were eventually considered to indicate à theological vocation; he was, in 1584, placed at the seminary of Adelberg, and thence removed, two years later, to that of Maulbronn. A brilliant examination for the degree of bachelor procured him, in 1588, admittance on the foundation to the university of Tübingen, where he laid up a copious store of classical erudition, and imbibed Copernican principles from the private instructions of his teacher and life-long friend, Michael Maestlin. As yet, however, he had little knowledge of, and less inclination for, astronomy; and it was with extreme reluctance that he turned aside from the more promising career of the ministry to accept, early in 1594, the vacant chair of that science at Gratz, placed at the disposal of the Tübingen professors by the Lutheran states of Styria.
KEPLER, JOHANN (1571-1630), a German astronomer, was born on December 27, 1571, in Weil, in the duchy of Württemberg, where his grandfather was the mayor. He was the oldest child from a mismatched marriage. His father, Henry Kepler, was a reckless soldier looking for fortune, while his mother, Catherine Guldenmann, the daughter of the mayor of Eltingen, was unruly and poorly educated. Her husband found relief from family life by campaigning in Flanders under Alva, and after losing everything he owned due to a failed investment and unsuccessfully trying to run a tavern in the village of Elmendingen, he eventually abandoned his family in 1589. The troubles in Kepler's childhood weren’t just due to his parents’ misfortunes. He survived smallpox at four, which left him with damaged hands and impaired eyesight, and his frail constitution from being born prematurely had to endure several bouts of serious illness. His education started in Leonberg in 1577—the same year, as he noted, that a great comet appeared; however, his family’s bankruptcy forced him into fieldwork for several years. His physical challenges, combined with his intellectual abilities, led others to think he had a calling for the ministry; in 1584, he was enrolled in the seminary at Adelberg, and two years later, he was moved to Maulbronn. A stellar performance in the bachelor's exam earned him admission to the university of Tübingen in 1588, where he built a strong foundation of classical knowledge and learned Copernican ideas from his teacher and lifelong friend, Michael Maestlin. At that time, though, he had little interest in astronomy and was very reluctant to switch from the more promising path of ministry to take up the empty chair of that subject in Gratz, which had been offered to the Tübingen professors by the Lutheran states of Styria in early 1594.
The best recognized function of German astronomers in that day was the construction of prophesying almanacs, greedily bought by a credulous public. Kepler thus found that the first duties required of him were of an astrological nature, and set himself with characteristic alacrity to master the rules of the art as laid down by Ptolemy and Cardan. He, moreover, sought in the events of his own life a verification of the theory of planetary influences; and it is to this practice that we owe the summary record of each year’s occurrences which, continued almost to his death, affords for his biography a slight but sure foundation. But his thoughts were already working in a higher sphere. He early attained to the settled conviction that for the actual disposition of the solar system some abstract intelligible reason must exist, and this, after much meditation, he believed himself to have found in an imaginary relation between the “five regular solids” and the number and distances of the planets. He notes with exultation the 9th of July 1595, as the date of the pseudo-discovery, the publication of which in Prodromus Dissertationum Cosmographicarum seu Mysterium Cosmographicum (Tübingen, 1596) procured him much fame, and a friendly correspondence with the two most eminent astronomers of the time, Tycho Brahe and Galileo.
The most well-known role of German astronomers back then was creating predictive almanacs, which were eagerly purchased by a gullible public. Kepler realized that the first tasks he faced were related to astrology, and he quickly set out to learn the rules of the practice as established by Ptolemy and Cardan. He also looked for evidence of planetary influences in his own life events, which is why we have a brief but reliable record of yearly occurrences that continued until close to his death, providing a slight foundation for his biography. However, his thoughts were already moving towards more advanced ideas. He soon became convinced that there must be some abstract, understandable reason for the arrangement of the solar system, and after much contemplation, he believed he had found it in an imaginary connection between the “five regular solids” and the number and distances of the planets. He excitedly noted July 9, 1595, as the date of this pseudo-discovery, the publication of which in Prodromus Dissertationum Cosmographicarum seu Mysterium Cosmographicum (Tübingen, 1596) earned him considerable fame and established a friendly correspondence with the two leading astronomers of the time, Tycho Brahe and Galileo.
Soon after his arrival at Gratz, Kepler contracted an engagement with Barbara von Mühleck, a wealthy Styrian heiress, who, at the age of twenty-three, had already survived one husband and been divorced from another. Before her relatives could be brought to countenance his pretensions, Kepler was obliged to undertake a journey to Württemberg to obtain documentary evidence of the somewhat obscure nobility of his family, and it was thus not until the 27th of April 1597 that the marriage was celebrated. In the following year the archduke Ferdinand, on assuming the government of his hereditary dominions, issued an edict of banishment against Protestant preachers and professors. Kepler immediately fled to the Hungarian frontier, but, by the favour of the Jesuits, was recalled and reinstated in his post. The gymnasium, however, was deserted; the nobles of Styria began to murmur at subsidizing a teacher without pupils; and he found it prudent to look elsewhere for employment. His refusal to subscribe unconditionally to the rigid formula of belief adopted by the theologians of Tübingen permanently closed against him the gates of his alma mater. His embarrassment was relieved however by an offer from Tycho Brahe of the position of assistant in his observatory near Prague, which, after a preliminary visit of four months, he accepted. The arrangement was made just in time; for in August 1600 he received definitive notice to leave Gratz, and, having leased his wife’s property, he departed with his family for Prague.
Soon after he arrived in Gratz, Kepler got engaged to Barbara von Mühleck, a wealthy heiress from Styria, who at twenty-three had already lost one husband and divorced another. Before her family would accept him, Kepler had to travel to Württemberg to get proof of his family’s somewhat unclear noble status, so they didn’t actually get married until April 27, 1597. The following year, Archduke Ferdinand, when he took over the government of his territories, issued a ban against Protestant preachers and professors. Kepler quickly fled to the Hungarian border, but thanks to the Jesuits, he was brought back and reinstated in his position. However, the gymnasium was empty; the noble families in Styria began to complain about paying a teacher with no students; so he wisely decided to look for work elsewhere. His refusal to unconditionally agree to the strict belief system set by the theologians in Tübingen permanently shut the door on him at his alma mater. Fortunately, he got an offer from Tycho Brahe to be an assistant at his observatory near Prague, which he accepted after a four-month visit. The arrangement came just in time, as in August 1600, he received official notice to leave Gratz, and after renting out his wife's property, he left with his family for Prague.
By Tycho’s unexpected death (Oct. 24, 1601) a brilliant career seemed to be thrown open to Kepler. The emperor Rudolph II. 750 immediately appointed him to succeed his patron as imperial mathematician, although at a reduced salary of 500 florins; the invaluable treasure of Tycho’s observations was placed at his disposal; and the laborious but congenial task was entrusted to him of completing the tables to which the grateful Dane had already affixed the title of Rudolphine. The first works executed by him at Prague were, nevertheless, a homage to the astrological proclivities of the emperor. In De fundamentis astrologiae certioribus (Prague, 1602) he declared his purpose of preserving and purifying the grain of truth which he believed the science to contain. Indeed, the doctrine of “aspects” and “influences” fitted excellently with his mystical conception of the universe, and enabled him to discharge with a semblance of sincerity the most lucrative part of his professional duties. Although he strictly limited his prophetic pretensions to the estimate of tendencies and probabilities, his forecasts were none the less in demand. Shrewd sense and considerable knowledge of the world came to the aid of stellar lore in the preparation of “prognostics” which, not unfrequently hitting off the event, earned him as much credit with the vulgar as his cosmical speculations with the learned. He drew the horoscopes of the emperor and Wallenstein, as well as of a host of lesser magnates; but, though keenly alive to the unworthy character of such a trade, he made necessity his excuse for a compromise with superstition. “Nature,” he wrote, “which has conferred upon every animal the means of subsistence, has given astrology as an adjunct and ally to astronomy.” He dedicated to the emperor in 1603 a treatise on the “great conjunction” of that year (Judicium de trigono igneo); and he published his observations on a brilliant star which appeared suddenly (Sept. 30, 1604), and remained visible for seventeen months, in De stella nova in pede Serpentarii (Prague, 1606). While sharing the opinion of Tycho as to the origin of such bodies by condensation of nebulous matter from the Milky Way, he attached a mystical signification to the coincidence in time and place of the sidereal apparition with a triple conjunction of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn.
By Tycho’s unexpected death on October 24, 1601, a brilliant opportunity opened up for Kepler. Emperor Rudolph II immediately appointed him to take over as imperial mathematician, although his salary was reduced to 500 florins. He was given access to the invaluable treasure of Tycho’s observations and assigned the challenging yet fitting task of completing the tables that the grateful Dane had already named Rudolphine. However, Kepler's first works in Prague paid homage to the emperor's astrological interests. In De fundamentis astrologiae certioribus (Prague, 1602), he declared his goal of preserving and refining the truth he believed existed within the science. The concepts of “aspects” and “influences” aligned well with his mystical view of the universe and allowed him to carry out the most profitable aspects of his job with some degree of sincerity. Although he limited his prophetic claims to assessing tendencies and probabilities, his predictions were still in high demand. His sharp insight and substantial worldly knowledge complemented his astrological skills in creating “prognostics,” which often proved accurate and earned him respect from the general public, just as his cosmological theories did among scholars. He cast horoscopes for the emperor and Wallenstein, as well as many other lesser figures; yet, fully aware of the questionable nature of such a profession, he justified his compromise with superstition by citing necessity. “Nature,” he wrote, “has given every animal the means to survive and has provided astrology as an aid and ally to astronomy.” In 1603, he presented a treatise to the emperor on the “great conjunction” of that year (Judicium de trigono igneo); he also published his observations of a bright star that appeared suddenly on September 30, 1604, which remained visible for seventeen months, in De stella nova in pede Serpentarii (Prague, 1606). While he agreed with Tycho on the origin of such celestial bodies stemming from the condensation of nebulous matter from the Milky Way, he attached a mystical significance to the timing and location of the star's appearance coinciding with a triple conjunction of Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.
The main task of his life was not meanwhile neglected. This was nothing less than the foundation of a new astronomy, in which physical cause should replace arbitrary hypothesis. A preliminary study of optics led to the publication, in 1604, of his Astronomiae pars optica, containing important discoveries in the theory of vision, and a notable approximation towards the true law of refraction. But it was not until 1609 that, the “great Martian labour” being at length completed, he was able, in his own figurative language, to lead the captive planet to the foot of the imperial throne. From the time of his first introduction to Tycho he had devoted himself to the investigation of the orbit of Mars, which, on account of its relatively large eccentricity, had always been especially recalcitrant to theory, and the results appeared in Astronomia nova αἱτιολογητός, seu Physica coelestis tradita commentariis de motibus stellae Martis (Prague, 1609). In this, the most memorable of Kepler’s multifarious writings, two of the cardinal principles of modern astronomy—the laws of elliptical orbits and of equal areas—were established (see Astronomy: History); important truths relating to gravity were enunciated, and the tides ascribed to the influence of lunar attraction; while an attempt to explain the planetary revolutions in the then backward condition of mechanical knowledge produced a theory of vortices closely resembling that afterwards adopted by Descartes. Having been provided, in August 1610, by Ernest, archbishop of Cologne, with one of the new Galilean instruments, Kepler began, with unspeakable delight, to observe the wonders revealed by it. He had welcomed with a little essay called Dissertatio cum Nuncio Sidereo Galileo’s first announcement of celestial novelties; he now, in his Dioptrice (Augsburg, 1611), expounded the theory of refraction by lenses, and suggested the principle of the “astronomical” or inverting telescope. Indeed the work may be said to have founded the branch of science to which it gave its name.
The main focus of his life wasn't neglected during this time. He was working on establishing a new astronomy, where physical causes would replace random theories. A preliminary study of optics resulted in the publication, in 1604, of his Astronomiae pars optica, which included significant discoveries in the theory of vision and a notable advancement towards the true law of refraction. However, it wasn't until 1609, after finishing the “great Martian labor,” that he could, in his own metaphorical words, bring the captive planet to the foot of the imperial throne. Since his first meeting with Tycho, he had dedicated himself to studying Mars' orbit, which had always been particularly challenging to theorize due to its relatively large eccentricity. The results were published in Astronomia nova αἱτιολογητός, seu Physica coelestis tradita commentariis de motibus stellae Martis (Prague, 1609). In this, one of the most important of Kepler’s many writings, two of the fundamental principles of modern astronomy—the laws of elliptical orbits and equal areas—were established (see Astronomy: History); crucial insights related to gravity were articulated, and tides were attributed to lunar attraction; while an attempt to explain planetary movements, given the limited mechanical knowledge of the time, resulted in a vortex theory similar to that later adopted by Descartes. In August 1610, gifted by Ernest, archbishop of Cologne, with one of the new Galilean instruments, Kepler began to observe the wonders it revealed with immense joy. He had previously welcomed Galileo’s first announcement of celestial discoveries with a brief essay titled Dissertatio cum Nuncio Sidereo; now, in his Dioptrice (Augsburg, 1611), he explained the theory of refraction through lenses and proposed the concept of the “astronomical” or inverting telescope. Indeed, this work can be considered the foundation of the scientific field it named.
The year 1611 was marked by Kepler as the most disastrous of his life. The death by small-pox of his favourite child was followed by that of his wife, who, long a prey to melancholy, was on the 3rd of July carried off by typhus. Public calamity was added to private bereavement. On the 23rd of May 1611 Matthias, brother of the emperor, assumed the Bohemian crown in Prague, compelling Rudolph to take refuge in the citadel, where he died on the 20th of January following. Kepler’s fidelity in remaining with him to the last did not deprive him of the favour of his successor. Payments of arrears, now amounting to upwards of 4000 florins, was not, however, in the desperate condition of the imperial finances, to be hoped for; and he was glad, while retaining his position as court astronomer, to accept (in 1612) the office of mathematician to the states of Upper Austria. His residence at Linz was troubled by the harsh conduct of the pastor Hitzler, in excluding him from the rites of his church on the ground of supposed Calvinistic leanings—a decision confirmed, with the addition of an insulting reprimand, on his appeal to Württemberg. In 1613 he appeared with the emperor Matthias before the diet of Ratisbon as the advocate of the introduction into Germany of the Gregorian calendar; but the attempt was for the time frustrated by anti-papal prejudice. The attention devoted by him to chronological subjects is evidenced by the publication about this period of several essays in which he sought to prove that the birth of Christ took place five years earlier than the commonly accepted date.
The year 1611 was marked by Kepler as the most disastrous of his life. The death of his favorite child from smallpox was followed by the loss of his wife, who, having long suffered from depression, succumbed to typhus on July 3rd. His private grief was compounded by public disaster. On May 23, 1611, Matthias, the emperor's brother, took the Bohemian crown in Prague, forcing Rudolph to seek refuge in the citadel, where he died on January 20 of the following year. Kepler's loyalty in staying with him until the end didn’t cost him the favor of his successor. However, with the imperial finances in such dire straits, he wasn’t hopeful about receiving payments he was owed that totaled over 4000 florins. He was relieved, while keeping his position as court astronomer, to accept the role of mathematician for the states of Upper Austria in 1612. His stay in Linz was disrupted by the harsh treatment from Pastor Hitzler, who excluded him from church rites based on alleged Calvinist sympathies—a ruling that was upheld, along with an insulting reprimand, when he appealed to Württemberg. In 1613, he appeared with Emperor Matthias before the Diet of Ratisbon as an advocate for introducing the Gregorian calendar to Germany, but the effort was thwarted at the time by anti-papal sentiment. His focus on chronological issues is reflected in several essays he published around this time, in which he tried to argue that Christ was born five years earlier than the widely accepted date.
Kepler’s second courtship forms the subject of a highly characteristic letter addressed by him to Baron Stralendorf, in which he reviews the qualifications of eleven candidates for his hand, and explains the reasons which decided his choice in favour of a portionless orphan girl named Susanna Reutlinger. The marriage was celebrated at Linz, on the 30th of October 1613, and seems to have proved a happy and suitable one. The abundant vintage of that year drew his attention to the defective methods in use for estimating the cubical contents of vessels, and his essay on the subject (Nova Stereometria Doliorum, Linz, 1615) entitles him to rank among those who prepared the discovery of the infinitesimal calculus. His observations on the three comets of 1618 were published in De Cometis, contemporaneously with De Harmonice Mundi (Augsburg, 1619), of which the first lineaments had been traced twenty years previously at Gratz. This extraordinary production is memorable as having announced the discovery of the “third law”—that of the sesquiplicate ratio between the planetary periods and distances. But the main purport of the treatise was the exposition of an elaborate system of celestial harmonies depending on the various and varying velocities of the several planets, of which the sentient soul animating the sun was the solitary auditor. The work exhibiting this fantastic emulation of extravagance with genius was dedicated to James I. of England, and the compliment was acknowledged with an invitation to that island, conveyed through Sir Henry Wotton. Notwithstanding the distracted state of his own country, he refused to abandon it, as he had previously, in 1617, declined the post of successor to G. A. Magini in the mathematical chair of Bologna.
Kepler’s second courtship is the subject of a very notable letter he wrote to Baron Stralendorf, in which he discusses the qualifications of eleven candidates for his hand and explains why he chose a poor orphan girl named Susanna Reutlinger. The marriage took place in Linz on October 30, 1613, and it seems to have been a happy and fitting union. The plentiful harvest that year drew his attention to the flawed methods used to measure the volume of vessels, and his essay on the topic (Nova Stereometria Doliorum, Linz, 1615) qualifies him to be considered among those who contributed to the development of calculus. His observations of the three comets in 1618 were published in De Cometis, alongside De Harmonice Mundi (Augsburg, 1619), which he had begun drafting twenty years earlier in Gratz. This remarkable work is significant for announcing the discovery of the “third law”—the relationship between the ratios of planetary periods and distances. However, the main focus of the treatise was to explain a complex system of celestial harmonies based on the various speeds of the different planets, with the sun as the sole listener. The work, blending extravagant ideas with genius, was dedicated to James I of England, and he responded with an invitation to visit the island, relayed through Sir Henry Wotton. Despite the turmoil in his own country, he refused to leave, just as he had previously turned down the position to succeed G. A. Magini in the mathematics chair at Bologna in 1617.
The insurmountable difficulties presented by the lunar theory forced Kepler, after an enormous amount of fruitless labour, to abandon his design of comprehending the whole scheme of the heavens in one great work to be called Hipparchus, and he then threw a portion of his materials into the form of a dialogue intended for the instruction of general readers. The Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae (Linz and Frankfort, 1618-1621), a lucid and attractive textbook of Copernican science, was remarkable for the prominence given to “physical astronomy,” as well as for the extension to the Jovian system of the laws recently discovered to regulate the motions of the planets. The first of a series of ephemerides, calculated on these principles, was published by him at Linz in 1617; and in that for 1620, dedicated to Baron Napier, he for the first time employed logarithms. This important invention was eagerly welcomed by him, and its theory formed the subject of a treatise entitled Chilias Logarithmorum, printed in 1624, but circulated in manuscript three years earlier, which largely contributed to bring the new method into general use in Germany.
The overwhelming challenges posed by the lunar theory led Kepler, after a lot of unproductive effort, to give up on his plan to understand the entire structure of the universe in one major work titled Hipparchus. Instead, he turned some of his materials into a dialogue meant for general readers. The Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae (Linz and Frankfurt, 1618-1621), a clear and engaging textbook on Copernican science, was notable for its focus on “physical astronomy” and for extending the recently discovered laws that govern planetary motion to the Jovian system. He published the first in a series of ephemerides based on these principles in Linz in 1617; in the one for 1620, dedicated to Baron Napier, he used logarithms for the first time. This significant invention was enthusiastically embraced by him, and its theory was the subject of a treatise called Chilias Logarithmorum, printed in 1624 but circulated in manuscript three years earlier, which greatly helped to popularize the new method in Germany.
His studies were interrupted by family trouble. The restless 751 disposition and unbridled tongue of Catherine Kepler, his mother, created for her numerous enemies in the little town of Leonberg; while her unguarded conduct exposed her to a species of calumny at that time readily circulated and believed. As early as 1615 suspicions of sorcery began to be spread against her, which she, with more spirit than prudence, met with an action for libel. The suit was purposely protracted, and at length, in 1620, the unhappy woman, then in her seventy-fourth year, was arrested on a formal charge of witchcraft. Kepler immediately hastened to Württemberg, and owing to his indefatigable exertions she was acquitted after having suffered thirteen month’s imprisonment, and endured with undaunted courage the formidable ordeal of “territion,” or examination under the imminent threat of torture. She survived her release only a few months, dying on the 13th of April 1622.
His studies were interrupted by family issues. The restless 751 nature and sharp tongue of Catherine Kepler, his mother, made her many enemies in the small town of Leonberg; her careless behavior made her a target for gossip that was easily spread and believed at the time. As early as 1615, rumors of witchcraft began to circulate against her, which she confronted with a libel lawsuit, showing more spirit than caution. The case was deliberately prolonged, and eventually, in 1620, the unfortunate woman, then seventy-four years old, was arrested on formal charges of witchcraft. Kepler quickly went to Württemberg, and thanks to his tireless efforts, she was acquitted after spending thirteen months in prison and bravely facing the terrifying ordeal of "territion," or examination under the threat of torture. She lived only a few months after her release, passing away on April 13, 1622.
Kepler’s whole attention was now devoted to the production of the new tables. “Germany,” he wrote, “does not long for peace more anxiously than I do for their publication.” But financial difficulties, combined with civil and religious convulsions, long delayed the accomplishment of his desires. From the 24th of June to the 29th of August 1626, Linz was besieged, and its inhabitants reduced to the utmost straits by bands of insurgent peasants. The pursuit of science needed a more tranquil shelter; and on the raising of the blockade, Kepler obtained permission to transfer his types to Ulm, where, in September 1627, the Rudolphine Tables were at length given to the world. Although by no means free from errors, their value appears from the fact that they ranked for a century as the best aid to astronomy. Appended were tables of logarithms and of refraction, together with Tycho’s catalogue of 777 stars, enlarged by Kepler to 1005.
Kepler’s entire focus was now on producing the new tables. “Germany,” he wrote, “does not long for peace more anxiously than I do for their publication.” However, financial issues, along with civil and religious turmoil, significantly delayed his goals. From June 24 to August 29, 1626, Linz was under siege, and its residents were pushed to their limits by groups of rebellious peasants. The pursuit of science needed a more peaceful environment; after the siege was lifted, Kepler got permission to move his types to Ulm, where, in September 1627, the Rudolphine Tables were finally released to the public. Although they were not free of errors, their importance is highlighted by the fact that they were considered the best resource for astronomy for a century. Included were tables of logarithms and refraction, along with Tycho’s catalogue of 777 stars, which Kepler expanded to 1005.
Kepler’s claims upon the insolvent imperial exchequer amounted by this time to 12,000 florins. The emperor Ferdinand II., too happy to transfer the burden, countenanced an arrangement by which Kepler entered the service of the duke of Friedland (Wallenstein), who assumed the full responsibility of the debt. In July 1628 Kepler accordingly arrived with his family at Sagan in Silesia, where he applied himself to the printing of his ephemerides up to the year 1636, and whence he issued, in 1629, a Notice to the Curious in Things Celestial, warning astronomers of approaching transits. That of Mercury was actually seen by Gassendi in Paris on the 7th of November 1631 (being the first passage of a planet across the sun ever observed); that of Venus, predicted for the 6th of December following, was invisible in western Europe. Wallenstein’s promises to Kepler were but imperfectly fulfilled. In lieu of the sums due, he offered him a professorship at Rostock, which Kepler declined. An expedition to Ratisbon, undertaken for the purpose of representing his case to the diet, terminated his life. Shaken by the journey, which he had performed entirely on horseback, he was attacked with fever, and died at Ratisbon, on the 15th of November (N.S.), 1630, in the fifty-ninth year of his age. An inventory of his effects showed him to have been possessed of no inconsiderable property at the time of his death. By his first wife he had five, and by his second seven children, of whom only two, a son and a daughter, reached maturity.
Kepler's claims on the bankrupt imperial treasury had reached 12,000 florins by this time. The emperor Ferdinand II, eager to offload the burden, supported an arrangement where Kepler would work for Duke Friedland (Wallenstein), who took on full responsibility for the debt. In July 1628, Kepler and his family arrived in Sagan, Silesia, where he focused on printing his ephemerides up to the year 1636. From there, in 1629, he published a Notice to the Curious in Things Celestial, warning astronomers about upcoming transits. Gassendi actually observed the transit of Mercury in Paris on November 7, 1631 (the first time a planet passing across the sun was observed); however, the predicted transit of Venus on December 6 was not visible in western Europe. Wallenstein's promises to Kepler were only partly fulfilled. Instead of the money owed, he offered Kepler a professorship at Rostock, which Kepler declined. A trip to Ratisbon, aimed at presenting his case to the diet, would end his life. The journey, which he made entirely on horseback, left him shaken, and he developed a fever, dying in Ratisbon on November 15, 1630 (N.S.), at the age of fifty-nine. An inventory of his belongings revealed that he had a considerable amount of property at the time of his death. He had five children with his first wife and seven with his second, but only two—one son and one daughter—survived to adulthood.
The character of Kepler’s genius is especially difficult to estimate. His tendency towards mystical speculation formed a not less fundamental quality of his mind than its strong grasp of positive scientific truth. Without assigning to each element its due value, no sound comprehension of his modes of thought can be attained. His idea of the universe was essentially Pythagorean and Platonic. He started with the conviction that the arrangement of its parts must correspond with certain abstract conceptions of the beautiful and harmonious. His imagination, thus kindled, animated him to those severe labours of which his great discoveries were the fruit. His demonstration that the planes of all the planetary orbits pass through the centre of the sun, coupled with his clear recognition of the sun as the moving power of the system, entitles him to rank as the founder of physical astronomy. But the fantastic relations imagined by him of planetary movements and distances to musical intervals and geometrical constructions seemed to himself discoveries no less admirable than the achievements which have secured his lasting fame. Outside the boundaries of the solar system, the metaphysical side of his genius, no longer held in check by experience, fully asserted itself. The Keplerian like the Pythagorean cosmos was threefold, consisting of the centre, or sun, the surface, represented by the sphere of the fixed stars, and the intermediate space, filled with ethereal matter. It is a mistake to suppose that he regarded the stars as so many suns. He quotes indeed the opinion of Giordano Bruno to that effect, but with dissent. Among his happy conjectures may be mentioned that of the sun’s axial rotation, postulated by him as the physical cause of the revolutions of the planets, and soon after confirmed by the discovery of sun-spots; the suggestion of a periodical variation in the obliquity of the ecliptic; and the explanation as a solar atmospheric effect of the radiance observed to surround the totally eclipsed sun.
The nature of Kepler’s genius is especially hard to assess. His inclination toward mystical speculation was as fundamental to his mind as his solid understanding of scientific truth. Without giving proper weight to each element, it's impossible to fully grasp his way of thinking. His view of the universe was fundamentally Pythagorean and Platonic. He began with the belief that the arrangement of its parts had to align with certain abstract ideas of beauty and harmony. This sparked his imagination, motivating him to undertake the rigorous work that led to his significant discoveries. His demonstration that the planes of all planetary orbits intersect at the sun’s center, along with his clear recognition of the sun as the driving force of the system, earns him the title of the founder of physical astronomy. However, the imaginative connections he made between planetary movements and distances with musical intervals and geometric shapes were discoveries he considered just as remarkable as the accomplishments that ensured his enduring fame. Beyond the solar system, the metaphysical aspect of his genius, no longer restrained by experience, flourished. Like the Pythagorean cosmos, Kepler's was tripartite, consisting of a center, or sun, a surface represented by the sphere of fixed stars, and the space in between, filled with ethereal matter. It's a misconception to think he viewed the stars as countless suns. He does reference Giordano Bruno's opinion on this, but he disagrees with it. Among his insightful speculations are the idea of the sun's axial rotation, which he proposed as the physical cause of the planets' revolutions and was later confirmed by the discovery of sunspots; the suggestion of a periodic change in the obliquity of the ecliptic; and the explanation of the glow surrounding the totally eclipsed sun as a solar atmospheric effect.
It is impossible to consider without surprise the colossal amount of work accomplished by Kepler under numerous disadvantages. But his iron industry counted no obstacles, and secured for him the highest triumph of genius, that of having given to mankind the best that was in him. In private character he was amiable and affectionate; his generosity in recognizing the merits of others secured him against the worst shafts of envy; and a life marked by numerous disquietudes was cheered and ennobled by sentiments of sincere piety.
It’s truly remarkable to think about the immense amount of work Kepler did despite facing many challenges. His strong determination faced no barriers, leading him to achieve the greatest legacy of genius—sharing his best contributions with humanity. Personally, he was kind and loving; his willingness to acknowledge the talents of others protected him from the harshest attacks of jealousy. Though his life was filled with various struggles, it was uplifted and made noble by his genuine faith.
Kepler’s extensive literary remains, purchased by the empress Catherine II. in 1724 from some Frankfort merchants, and long inaccessibly deposited in the observatory of Pulkowa, were fully brought to light, under the able editorship of Dr Ch. Frisch, in the first complete edition of his works. This important publication (Joannis Kepleri opera omnia, Frankfort, 1858-1871, 8 vols. 8vo) contains, besides the works already enumerated and several minor treatises, a posthumous scientific satire entitled Joh. Keppleri Somnium (first printed in 1634) and a vast mass of his correspondence. A careful biography is appended, founded mainly on his private notes and other authentic documents. His correspondence with Herwart von Hohenburg, unearthed by C. Anschütz at Munich, was printed at Prague in 1886.
Kepler’s extensive literary works, bought by Empress Catherine II in 1724 from some merchants in Frankfurt, and long stored away in the Pulkowa Observatory, were finally published under the skilled editorship of Dr. Ch. Frisch in the first complete edition of his works. This significant publication (Joannis Kepleri opera omnia, Frankfurt, 1858-1871, 8 vols. 8vo) includes not only the previously listed works and several minor essays but also a posthumous scientific satire called Joh. Keppleri Somnium (first printed in 1634) and a large collection of his correspondence. A thorough biography is included, based mainly on his personal notes and other authentic documents. His correspondence with Herwart von Hohenburg, discovered by C. Anschütz in Munich, was published in Prague in 1886.
Authorities—C. G. Reuschle, Kepler und die Astronomie (Frankfort, 1871); Karl Goebel, Über Keplers astronomische Anschauungen (Halle, 1871); E. F. Apelt, Johann Keplers astronomische Weltansicht (Leipzig, 1849); J. L. C. Breitschwert, Johann Keplers Leben und Wirken (Stuttgart, 1831); W. Förster, Johann Kepler und die Harmonie der Sphären (Berlin, 1862); R. Wolf, Geschichte der Astronomie (Munich, 1877); J. von Hasner, Tycho Brahe und J. Kepler in Prag (1872); H. Brocard, Essai sur la Météorologie de Kepler (Grenoble, 1879, 1881); Siegmund Günther, Johannes Kepler und der tellurisch-kosmische Magnetismus (Wien, 1888); N. Herz, Keplers Astrologie (1895); Ludwig Günther, Keplers Traum vom Mond (1898; an annotated translation of the Somnium); A. Müller, Johann Keppler, der Gesetzgeber der neueren Astronomie (1903); Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, Bd. XV. (1882).
Authorities—C. G. Reuschle, Kepler and Astronomy (Frankfurt, 1871); Karl Goebel, On Kepler's Astronomical Views (Halle, 1871); E. F. Apelt, Johann Kepler's Astronomical Worldview (Leipzig, 1849); J. L. C. Breitschwert, The Life and Work of Johann Kepler (Stuttgart, 1831); W. Förster, Johann Kepler and the Harmony of the Spheres (Berlin, 1862); R. Wolf, A History of Astronomy (Munich, 1877); J. von Hasner, Tycho Brahe and J. Kepler in Prague (1872); H. Brocard, Essay on Kepler's Meteorology (Grenoble, 1879, 1881); Siegmund Günther, Johannes Kepler and Telluric-Cosmic Magnetism (Vienna, 1888); N. Herz, Kepler's Astrology (1895); Ludwig Günther, Kepler's Dream of the Moon (1898; an annotated translation of Somnium); A. Müller, Johann Kepler, the Lawgiver of Modern Astronomy (1903); General German Biography, Vol. XV. (1882).

KEPPEL, AUGUSTUS KEPPEL, Viscount (1725-1786), British admiral, second son of the second earl of Albemarle, was born on the 25th of April 1725. He went to sea at the age of ten, and had already five years of service to his credit when he was appointed to the “Centurion,” and was sent with Anson round the world in 1740. He had a narrow escape of being killed in the capture of Paita (Nov. 13, 1741), and was named acting lieutenant in 1742. In 1744 he was promoted to be commander and post captain. Until the peace of 1748 he was actively employed. In 1747 he ran his ship the “Maidstone” (50) ashore near Belleisle while chasing a French vessel, but was honourably acquitted by a court martial, and reappointed to another command. After peace had been signed he was sent into the Mediterranean to persuade the dey of Algiers to restrain the piratical operations of his subjects. The dey is said to have complained that the king of England should have sent a beardless boy to treat with him, and to have been told that if the beard was the necessary qualification for an ambassador it would have been easy to send a “Billy goat.” After trying the effect of bullying without success, the dey made a treaty, and Keppel returned in 1751. During the Seven Years’ War he saw constant service. He was in North America in 1755, on the coast of France in 1756, was detached on a cruise to reduce the French settlements on the west coast of Africa in 1758, and his ship the “Torbay” (74) was the first to get into action in the battle of Quiberon in 1759. In 1757 he had formed part of the court martial which had condemned Admiral Byng, and had been active among those who had endeavoured to secure a pardon for him; but neither he nor those who had acted with him could produce any serious reason why the sentence should not be carried out. When Spain joined France in 1762 he was sent as second in command with Sir George Pocock in the expedition which took Havannah. His health suffered from the fever which carried off an immense proportion of the soldiers and sailors, but the 752 £25,000 of prize money which he received freed him from the unpleasant position of younger son of a family ruined by the extravagance of his father. He became rear-admiral in October 1762, was one of the Admiralty Board from July 1765 to November 1766, and was promoted vice-admiral on the 24th of October 1770. When the Falkland Island dispute occurred in 1770 he was to have commanded the fleet to be sent against Spain, but a settlement was reached, and he had no occasion to hoist his flag. The most important and the most debated period of his life belongs to the opening years of the war of American Independence. Keppel was by family connexion and personal preference a strong supporter of the Whig connexion, led by the Marquess of Rockingham and the Duke of Richmond. He shared in all the passions of his party, then excluded from power by the resolute will of George III. As a member of Parliament, in which he had a seat for Windsor from 1761 till 1780, and then for Surrey, he was a steady partisan, and was in constant hostility with the “King’s Friends.” In common with them he was prepared to believe that the king’s ministers, and in particular Lord Sandwich, then First Lord of the Admiralty, were capable of any villany. When therefore he was appointed to command the Western Squadron, the main fleet prepared against France in 1778, he went to sea predisposed to think that the First Lord would be glad to cause him to be defeated. It was a further misfortune that when Keppel hoisted his flag one of his subordinate admirals should have been Sir Hugh Palliser (1723-1796), who was a member of the Admiralty Board, a member of parliament, and in Keppel’s opinion, which was generally shared, jointly responsible with his colleagues for the bad state of the navy. When, therefore, the battle which Keppel fought with the French on the 27th of July 1778 ended in a highly unsatisfactory manner, owing mainly to his own unintelligent management, but partly through the failure of Sir Hugh Palliser to obey orders, he became convinced that he had been deliberately betrayed. Though he praised Sir Hugh in his public despatch he attacked him in private, and the Whig press, with the unquestionable aid of Keppel’s friends, began a campaign of calumny to which the ministerial papers answered in the same style, each side accusing the other of deliberate treason. The result was a scandalous series of scenes in parliament and of courts martial. Keppel was first tried and acquitted in 1779, and then Palliser was also tried and acquitted. Keppel was ordered to strike his flag in March 1779. Until the fall of Lord North’s ministry he acted as an opposition member of parliament. When it fell in 1782 be became First Lord, and was created Viscount Keppel and Baron Elden. His career in office was not distinguished, and he broke with his old political associates by resigning as a protest against the Peace of Paris. He finally discredited himself by joining the Coalition ministry formed by North and Fox, and with its fall disappeared from public life. He died unmarried on the 2nd of October 1786. Burke, who regarded him with great affection, said that he had “something high” in his nature, and that it was “a wild stock of pride on which the tenderest of all hearts had grafted the milder virtues.” His popularity disappeared entirely in his later years. His portrait was six times painted by Sir Joshua Reynolds. The copy which belonged originally to Burke is now in the National Gallery.
KEPPEL, AUGUSTUS KEPPEL, Viscount (1725-1786), British admiral, the second son of the second Earl of Albemarle, was born on April 25, 1725. He went to sea at age ten and already had five years of service when he was appointed to the “Centurion” and sent with Anson to sail around the world in 1740. He narrowly escaped death during the capture of Paita on November 13, 1741, and was made acting lieutenant in 1742. In 1744, he was promoted to commander and post captain. He was actively employed until the peace of 1748. In 1747, he ran his ship, the “Maidstone” (50), ashore near Belleisle while chasing a French vessel but was honorably acquitted by a court martial and reassigned to another command. After the peace was signed, he was sent to the Mediterranean to convince the dey of Algiers to control the piracy of his subjects. The dey reportedly complained that the King of England sent a beardless boy to negotiate with him, and he was told that if having a beard was a requirement for an ambassador, it would have been easy to send a “Billy goat.” After unsuccessfully trying to bully the dey, a treaty was made, and Keppel returned in 1751. During the Seven Years’ War, he served continuously. He was in North America in 1755, off the coast of France in 1756, and sent on a cruise in 1758 to reduce the French settlements on the west coast of Africa. His ship, the “Torbay” (74), was the first to engage in the battle of Quiberon in 1759. In 1757, he was part of the court martial that condemned Admiral Byng and was involved in attempts to secure a pardon for him; however, neither he nor his supporters could provide a solid reason to prevent the sentence from being carried out. When Spain allied with France in 1762, he was appointed second in command under Sir George Pocock in the expedition that captured Havannah. He fell ill with a fever that affected many soldiers and sailors, but the £25,000 in prize money he received relieved him from the burdens of being a younger son of a family financially ruined by his father's extravagance. He became rear-admiral in October 1762, was part of the Admiralty Board from July 1765 to November 1766, and was promoted to vice-admiral on October 24, 1770. When the Falkland Islands dispute arose in 1770, he was set to command the fleet against Spain, but a settlement was reached, and he did not need to raise his flag. The most significant and debated period of his life occurred during the early years of the American War of Independence. Keppel was a strong supporter of the Whig faction, led by the Marquess of Rockingham and the Duke of Richmond, due to both family connections and personal preference. He shared the intense feelings of his party, which was excluded from power by George III's decisive will. As a Member of Parliament for Windsor from 1761 to 1780 and then for Surrey, he was a consistent partisan and remained in constant opposition to the “King’s Friends.” Like many, he was inclined to believe that the king's ministers, particularly Lord Sandwich, the First Lord of the Admiralty, were capable of any wrongdoing. So when he was appointed to command the Western Squadron, the main fleet prepared against France in 1778, he set out predisposed to think the First Lord would want to see him defeated. It was an additional misfortune that when Keppel raised his flag, one of his subordinate admirals was Sir Hugh Palliser (1723-1796), a member of the Admiralty Board and Parliament, whom Keppel and most others believed shared blame with his colleagues for the navy's poor state. When the battle Keppel fought with the French on July 27, 1778, ended unsatisfactorily—mainly due to his poor management but also due to Palliser's failure to follow orders—he became convinced he had been betrayed on purpose. Although he praised Palliser in his public dispatch, he criticized him privately, and the Whig press, backed by Keppel’s allies, launched a smear campaign that resulted in both sides accusing each other of treason. This led to a scandalous series of scenes in Parliament and courts martial. Keppel was tried and acquitted in 1779, followed by Palliser, who was also acquitted. Keppel was ordered to strike his flag in March 1779. Until Lord North's ministry fell, he acted as an opposition member in Parliament. When it collapsed in 1782, he became First Lord and was made Viscount Keppel and Baron Elden. His time in office was not remarkable, and he broke away from his former political allies by resigning in protest against the Peace of Paris. He ultimately damaged his reputation by joining the Coalition ministry formed by North and Fox, and after its downfall, he disappeared from public life. He died unmarried on October 2, 1786. Burke, who held him in high regard, said he had “something high” in his nature and that it was “a wild stock of pride on which the tenderest of all hearts had grafted the milder virtues.” His popularity vanished entirely in his later years. His portrait was painted six times by Sir Joshua Reynolds. The version originally belonging to Burke is now in the National Gallery.
There is a full Life of Keppel (1842), by his grand-nephew, the Rev. Thomas Keppel.
There is a complete Life of Keppel (1842), written by his grand-nephew, the Rev. Thomas Keppel.

KEPPEL, SIR HENRY (1809-1904), British admiral, son of the 4th earl of Albemarle and of his wife Elizabeth, daughter of Lord de Clifford, was born on the 14th of June 1809, and entered the navy from the old naval academy of Portsmouth in 1822. His family connexions secured him rapid promotion, at a time when the rise of less fortunate officers was very slow. He became lieutenant in 1829 and commander in 1833. His first command in the “Childers” brig (16) was largely passed on the coast of Spain, which was then in the midst of the convulsions of the Carlist war. Captain Keppel had already made himself known as a good seaman. He was engaged with the squadron stationed on the west coast of Africa to suppress the slave trade. In 1837 he was promoted post captain, and appointed in 1841 to the “Dido” for service in China and against the Malay pirates, a service which he repeated in 1847, when in command of H.M.S. “Maeander.” The story of his two commands was told by himself in two publications, The Expedition to Borneo of H.M.S. “Dido” for the Suppression of Piracy (1846), and in A Visit to the Indian Archipelago in H. M. S. “Maeander” (1853). The substance of these books was afterwards incorporated into his autobiography, which was published in 1809 under the title A Sailor’s Life under four Sovereigns. In 1853 he was appointed to the command of the “St Jean d’Acre” of 101 guns for service in the Crimean War. But he had no opportunity to distinguish himself at sea in that struggle. As commander of the naval brigade landed to co-operate in the siege of Sevastopol, he was more fortunate, and he had an honourable share in the latter days of the siege and reduction of the fortress. After the Crimean War he was again sent out to China, this time in command of the “Raleigh,” as commodore to serve under Sir M. Seymour. The “Raleigh” was lost on an uncharted rock near Hong-Kong, but three small vessels were named to act as her tenders, and Commodore Keppel commanded in them, and with the crew of the “Raleigh,” in the action with the Chinese at Fatshan Creek (June 1, 1857). He was honourably acquitted for the loss of the “Raleigh,” and was named to the command of the “Alligator,” which he held till his promotion to rear-admiral. For his share in the action at Fatshan Creek he was made K.C.B. The prevalence of peace gave Sir Henry Keppel no further chance of active service, but he held successive commands till his retirement from the active list in 1879, two years after he attained the rank of Admiral of the Fleet. He died at the age of 95 on the 17th of January 1904.
KEPPEL, SIR HENRY (1809-1904), British admiral, was the son of the 4th earl of Albemarle and his wife Elizabeth, who was the daughter of Lord de Clifford. He was born on June 14, 1809, and joined the navy through the old naval academy in Portsmouth in 1822. His family connections helped him get promoted quickly at a time when others had to wait much longer for advancement. He became a lieutenant in 1829 and a commander in 1833. His first command was in the “Childers” brig (16), which operated along the coast of Spain during the turbulent times of the Carlist war. Captain Keppel had already established himself as a capable sailor. He was involved with the squadron stationed on the west coast of Africa to help suppress the slave trade. In 1837, he was promoted to post captain and, in 1841, was assigned to the “Dido” for service in China and against Malay pirates, a role he repeated in 1847 with the command of H.M.S. “Maeander.” He recounted his two assignments in two publications, The Expedition to Borneo of H.M.S. “Dido” for the Suppression of Piracy (1846) and A Visit to the Indian Archipelago in H. M. S. “Maeander” (1853). The main content of these books was later included in his autobiography, published in 1809 as A Sailor’s Life under four Sovereigns. In 1853, he was appointed to command the “St Jean d’Acre,” a ship with 101 guns, for service in the Crimean War. However, he didn't have the chance to make a notable contribution at sea during that conflict. As the leader of the naval brigade sent to assist in the siege of Sevastopol, he had better luck and played a significant role in the latter days of the siege and the fall of the fortress. After the Crimean War, he was sent back to China, this time in command of the “Raleigh,” serving as commodore under Sir M. Seymour. The “Raleigh” was lost on an uncharted rock near Hong Kong, but three small ships were designated to serve as her tenders. Commodore Keppel led them, along with the crew of the “Raleigh,” during the engagement with Chinese forces at Fatshan Creek on June 1, 1857. He was honorably cleared of blame for the loss of the “Raleigh” and was given command of the “Alligator,” which he led until he was promoted to rear-admiral. For his role in the battle at Fatshan Creek, he was appointed K.C.B. The peace that followed the conflict offered Sir Henry Keppel no more opportunities for active service, though he held various commands until he retired from active duty in 1879, two years after achieving the rank of Admiral of the Fleet. He passed away at the age of 95 on January 17, 1904.

KER, JOHN (1673-1726), Scottish spy, was born in Ayrshire on the 8th of August 1673. His true name was Crawfurd, his father being Alexander Crawfurd of Crawfurdland; but having married Anna, younger daughter of Robert Ker, of Kersland, Ayrshire, whose only son Daniel Ker was killed at the battle of Steinkirk in 1692, he assumed the name and arms of Ker in 1697, after buying the family estates from his wife’s elder sister. Having become a leader among the extreme Covenanters, he made use of his influence to relieve his pecuniary embarrassments, selling his support at one time to the Jacobites, at another to the government, and whenever possible to both parties at the same time. He held a licence from the government in 1707 permitting him to associate with those whose disloyalty was known or suspected, proving that he was at that date the government’s paid spy; and in his Memoirs Ker asserts that he had a number of other spies and agents working under his orders in different parts of the country. He entered into correspondence with Catholic priests and Jacobite conspirators, whose schemes, so far as he could make himself cognisant of them, he betrayed to the government. But he was known to be a man of the worst character, and it is improbable that he succeeded in gaining the confidence of people of any importance. The duchess of Gordon was for a time, it is true, one of his correspondents, but in 1707 she had discovered him to be “a knave.” He went to London in 1709, where he seems to have extracted considerable sums of money from politicians of both parties by promising or threatening, as the case might be, to expose Godolphin’s relations with the Jacobites. In 1713, if his own story is to be believed, business of a semi-diplomatic nature took Ker to Vienna, where, although he failed in the principal object of his errand, the emperor made him a present of his portrait set in jewels. Ker also occupied his time in Vienna, he says, by gathering information which he forwarded to the electress Sophia; and in the following year on his way home he stopped at Hanover to give some advice to the future king of England as to the best way to govern the English. Although in his own opinion Ker materially assisted in placing George I. on the English throne, his services were unrewarded, owing, he would have us believe, to the incorruptibility of his character. Similar ingratitude was the recompense for his revelations of the Jacobite intentions in 1715; 753 and as he was no more successful in making money out of the East India Company, nor in certain commercial schemes which engaged his ingenuity during the next few years, he died in a debtors’ prison, on the 8th of July 1726. While in the King’s Bench he sold to Edmund Curll the bookseller, a fellow-prisoner, who was serving a sentence of five months for publishing obscene books, the manuscript of (or possibly only the materials on which were based) the Memoirs of John Ker of Kersland, which Curll published in 1726 in three parts, the last of which appeared after Ker’s death. For issuing the first part of the Memoirs, which purported to make disclosures damaging to the government, but which Curll in self-justification described as “vindicating the memory of Queen Anne,” the publisher was sentenced to the pillory at Charing Cross; and he added to the third part of the Memoirs the indictment on which he had been convicted.
KER, JOHN (1673-1726), Scottish spy, was born in Ayrshire on August 8, 1673. His real name was Crawfurd; his father was Alexander Crawfurd of Crawfurdland. After marrying Anna, the younger daughter of Robert Ker of Kersland in Ayrshire, whose only son Daniel Ker died at the battle of Steinkirk in 1692, he adopted the name and arms of Ker in 1697 after purchasing the family estates from his wife’s older sister. As a leader among the extreme Covenanters, he used his influence to resolve his financial issues, switching his loyalty from the Jacobites to the government and often trying to play both sides at once. He received a license from the government in 1707 allowing him to associate with known or suspected disloyal individuals, indicating that he was, at that time, a government-paid spy. In his Memoirs, Ker claims that he had several spies and agents working under him in various parts of the country. He corresponded with Catholic priests and Jacobite conspirators, betraying their plans to the government to the best of his knowledge. However, he was known to have a terrible reputation, and it’s unlikely he gained the trust of anyone important. The Duchess of Gordon was once one of his correspondents, but by 1707 she had discovered him to be “a knave.” He moved to London in 1709, where it seems he managed to extract significant sums of money from politicians on both sides by either promising or threatening to expose Godolphin’s ties with the Jacobites. In 1713, if his own account can be trusted, he went to Vienna on semi-diplomatic business, where, though he failed in his main objective, the emperor gifted him a jeweled portrait. He also claimed to spend his time in Vienna gathering intelligence, which he sent to the electress Sophia. On his way home the following year, he stopped in Hanover to offer advice to the future king of England on how best to govern the English. Despite believing he was instrumental in getting George I on the English throne, he felt his efforts went unrewarded, supposedly due to his own integrity. He faced a similar betrayal for revealing Jacobite plans in 1715; 753 and since he was also unsuccessful in profiting from the East India Company and various business ventures in the following years, he ended up dying in a debtors' prison on July 8, 1726. While in the King’s Bench, he sold his manuscript (or possibly just the materials for) the Memoirs of John Ker of Kersland to fellow prisoner and bookseller Edmund Curll, who was serving a five-month sentence for publishing obscene material. Curll published this in three parts in 1726, with the last part coming out after Ker's death. For releasing the first part of the Memoirs, which allegedly revealed damaging information about the government but which Curll justified as “vindicating the memory of Queen Anne,” the publisher was sentenced to the pillory at Charing Cross; he also added to the third part of the Memoirs the indictment for which he had been convicted.
See the above-mentioned Memoirs (London, 1726-1727), and in particular the “preface” to part i.; George Lockhart, The Lockhart Papers (2 vols., London, 1817); Nathaniel Hooke, Correspondence, edited by W. D. Macray (Roxburghe Club, 2 vols., London, 1870), in which Ker is referred to under several pseudonyms, such as “Wicks,” “Trustie,” “The Cameronian Mealmonger,” &c.
See the aforementioned Memoirs (London, 1726-1727), especially the “preface” to part i.; George Lockhart, The Lockhart Papers (2 vols., London, 1817); Nathaniel Hooke, Correspondence, edited by W. D. Macray (Roxburghe Club, 2 vols., London, 1870), where Ker is mentioned under various pseudonyms like “Wicks,” “Trustie,” “The Cameronian Mealmonger,” etc.

KERAK, a town in eastern Palestine, 10 m. E. of the southern angle of the Lisan promontory of the Dead Sea, on the top of a rocky hill about 3000 ft. above sea-level. It stands on a platform forming an irregular triangle with sides about 3000 ft. in length, and separated by deep ravines from the ranges around on all sides but one. The population is estimated at 6000 Moslems and 1800 Orthodox Greek Christians. Kerak is identified with the Moabite town of Kir-Hareseth (destroyed by the Hebrew-Edomite coalition, 2 Kings iii. 25), and denounced by Isaiah under the name Kir of Moab (xv. 1), Kir-Hareseth (xvi. 7) or Kir-Heres (xvi. 11): Jeremiah also refers to it by the last name (xxxix. 31, 36). The modern name, in the form Χάραξ, appears in 2 Macc. xii. 17. Later, Kerak was the seat of the archbishop of Petra. The Latin kings of Jerusalem, recognizing its importance as the key of the E. Jordan region, fortified it in 1142; from 1183 it was attacked desperately by Saladin, to whom at last it yielded in 1188. The Arabian Ayyubite princes fortified the town, as did the Egyptian Mameluke sultans. The fortifications were repaired by Bibars in the 13th century. For a long time after the Turkish occupation of Palestine and Egypt it enjoyed a semi-independence, but in 1893 a Turkish governor with a strong garrison was established there, which has greatly contributed to secure the safety of travellers and the general quiet of the district. The town is an irregular congeries of flat mud-roofed houses. In the Christian quarter is the church of St George; the mosque also is a building of Christian origin. The town is surrounded by a wall with five towers; entrance now is obtained through breaches in the wall, but formerly it was accessible only by means of tunnels cut in the rocky substratum. The castle, now used as the headquarters of the garrison and closed to visitors, is a remarkably fine example of a crusaders’ fortress.
KERAK, is a town in eastern Palestine, located 10 miles east of the southern tip of the Lisan promontory of the Dead Sea, sitting on top of a rocky hill about 3000 feet above sea level. It features a platform that forms an irregular triangle with sides approximately 3000 feet long, separated by deep ravines from the surrounding mountain ranges except for one side. The population is estimated to be 6000 Muslims and 1800 Orthodox Greek Christians. Kerak is identified with the Moabite town of Kir-Hareseth (which was destroyed by the Hebrew-Edomite coalition, as mentioned in 2 Kings 3:25) and is referenced by Isaiah under the names Kir of Moab (15:1), Kir-Hareseth (16:7), or Kir-Heres (16:11). Jeremiah also mentions it by the last name (39:31, 36). The modern name, in the form Χάραξ, appears in 2 Maccabees 12:17. Later on, Kerak became the seat of the archbishop of Petra. The Latin kings of Jerusalem recognized its significance as the key to the eastern Jordan region and fortified it in 1142; starting in 1183, it was fiercely attacked by Saladin, who finally captured it in 1188. The Arabian Ayyubite princes fortified the town, as did the Egyptian Mameluke sultans. The fortifications were repaired by Bibars in the 13th century. For a long period after the Turkish occupation of Palestine and Egypt, it enjoyed a semi-independence, but in 1893, a Turkish governor along with a strong garrison was established there, greatly enhancing the safety of travelers and the general peace of the area. The town consists of an irregular collection of flat, mud-roofed houses. In the Christian quarter, there's the church of St. George, and the mosque is also built on Christian foundations. The town is surrounded by a wall with five towers; currently, access is obtained through breaches in the wall, but in the past, the town could only be reached via tunnels cut into the rocky ground. The castle, now serving as the garrison headquarters and closed to visitors, is a remarkably fine example of a crusader fortress.

KERALA, or Chera, the name of one of the three ancient Dravidian kingdoms of the Tamil country of southern India, the other two being the Chola and the Pandya. Its original territory comprised the country now contained in the Malabar district, with Travancore and Cochin, and later the country included in the Coimbatore district and a part of Salem. The boundaries, however, naturally varied much from time to time. The earliest references to this kingdom appear in the edicts of Asoka, where it is called Keralaputra (i.e. son of Kerala), a name which in a slightly corrupt form is known to Pliny and the author of the Periplus. There is evidence of a lively trade carried on by sea with the Roman empire in the early centuries of the Christian era, but of the political history of the Kerala kingdom nothing is known beyond a list of rajas compiled from inscriptions, until in the 10th century the struggle began with the Cholas, by whom it was conquered and held till their overthrow by the Mahommedans in 1310. These in their turn were driven out by a Hindu confederation headed by the chiefs of Vijayanagar, and Kerala was absorbed in the Vijayanagar empire until its destruction by the Mahommedans in 1565. For about 80 years it seems to have preserved a precarious independence under the naiks of Madura, but in 1640 was conquered by the Adil Shah dynasty of Bijapur and in 1652 seized by the king of Mysore.
KERALA, or Chera, is the name of one of the three ancient Dravidian kingdoms in the Tamil region of southern India, the other two being the Chola and the Pandya. Its original territory included what is now the Malabar district, along with Travancore and Cochin, and later parts of the Coimbatore district and a portion of Salem. However, the boundaries changed frequently over time. The earliest references to this kingdom can be found in the edicts of Asoka, where it is referred to as Keralaputra (i.e. son of Kerala), a name that appears in a slightly altered form in the writings of Pliny and the author of the Periplus. There is evidence of active maritime trade with the Roman Empire during the early centuries of the Christian era, but little is known about the political history of the Kerala kingdom aside from a list of kings compiled from inscriptions until the 10th century, when conflicts began with the Cholas, who conquered it and held it until they were overthrown by the Mahommedans in 1310. The Mahommedans were subsequently expelled by a Hindu alliance led by the rulers of Vijayanagar, and Kerala became part of the Vijayanagar empire until its collapse in 1565 due to the renewed Muslim invasions. For about 80 years, it appears to have maintained a fragile independence under the naiks of Madura, but in 1640 it was conquered by the Adil Shah dynasty of Bijapur and seized by the king of Mysore in 1652.
See V. A. Smith, Early Hist. of India, chap. xvi. (2nd ed., Oxford, 1908).
See V. A. Smith, Early Hist. of India, chap. xvi. (2nd ed., Oxford, 1908).

KERASUND (anc. Choerades, Pharnacia, Cerasus), a town on the N. coast of Asia Minor, in the Trebizond vilayet, and the port—an exposed roadstead—of Kara-Hissar Sharki, with which it is connected by a carriage road. Pop. just under 10,000, Moslems being in a slight minority. The town is situated on a rocky promontory, crowned by a Byzantine fortress, and has a growing trade. It exports filberts (for which product it is the centre), walnuts, hides and timber. Cerasus was the place from which the wild cherry was introduced into Italy by Lucullus and so to Europe (hence Fr. cerise, “cherry”).
KERASUND (formerly Choerades, Pharnacia, Cerasus), is a town on the northern coast of Asia Minor, in the Trebizond province, and serves as the port—an exposed roadstead—of Kara-Hissar Sharki, which is linked by a carriage road. The population is just under 10,000, with Muslims making up a slight minority. The town is located on a rocky promontory topped by a Byzantine fortress and has a growing economy. It exports hazelnuts (for which it is the main center), walnuts, hides, and timber. Cerasus is known as the place where Lucullus introduced the wild cherry into Italy and subsequently into Europe (hence the French word cerise, meaning “cherry”).

KÉRATRY, AUGUSTE HILARION, Comte de (1769-1859), French writer and politician, was born at Rennes on the 28th of December 1769. Coming to Paris in 1790, he associated himself with Bernardin de St Pierre. After being twice imprisoned during the Terror he retired to Brittany, where he devoted himself to literature till 1814. In 1818 he returned to Paris as deputy for Finistère, and sat in the Chamber till 1824, becoming one of the recognized liberal leaders. He was re-elected in 1827, took an active part in the establishment of the July monarchy, was appointed a councillor of state (1830), and in 1837 was made a peer of France. After the coup d’état of 1851 he retired from public life. Among his publications were Contes et Idylles (1791); Lysus et Cydippe, a poem (1801); Inductions morales et physiologiques (1817); Documents pour servir à l’histoire de France (1820); Du Beau dans les arts d’imitation (1822); Le Dernier des Beaumanoir (1824). His last work, Clarisse (1854), a novel, was written when he was eighty-five. He died at Port-Marly on the 7th of November 1859.
KÉRATRY, AUGUSTE HILARION, Count of (1769-1859), French writer and politician, was born in Rennes on December 28, 1769. He moved to Paris in 1790 and became associated with Bernardin de St Pierre. After being imprisoned twice during the Terror, he retired to Brittany, where he focused on literature until 1814. In 1818, he returned to Paris as a deputy for Finistère and served in the Chamber until 1824, becoming one of the recognized liberal leaders. He was re-elected in 1827, actively participated in the establishment of the July monarchy, was appointed a councillor of state in 1830, and became a peer of France in 1837. After the coup d’état of 1851, he withdrew from public life. His publications included Contes et Idylles (1791); Lysus et Cydippe, a poem (1801); Inductions morales et physiologiques (1817); Documents pour servir à l’histoire de France (1820); Du Beau dans les arts d’imitation (1822); Le Dernier des Beaumanoir (1824). His last work, Clarisse (1854), a novel, was written when he was eighty-five. He died in Port-Marly on November 7, 1859.
His son, comte Emile de Kératry (1832- ), became deputy for Finistère in 1869, and strongly supported the war with Germany in 1870. He was in Paris during part of the siege, but escaped in a balloon, and joined Gambetta. In 1871 Thiers appointed him to the prefecture, first of the Haute-Garonne, and subsequently of the Bouches-du-Rhône, but he resigned in the following year. He is the author of La Contre-guérilla française au Mexique (1868); L’Élévation et la chute de l’empereur Maximilien (1867); Le Quatre-septembre et le gouvernement de la défense nationale (1872); Mourad V. (1878), and some volumes of memories.
His son, Comte Emile de Kératry (1832- ), became a deputy for Finistère in 1869 and strongly supported the war against Germany in 1870. He was in Paris during part of the siege but escaped in a balloon and joined Gambetta. In 1871, Thiers appointed him to the prefecture, first of Haute-Garonne and then of Bouches-du-Rhône, but he resigned the following year. He authored La Contre-guérilla française au Mexique (1868); L’Élévation et la chute de l’empereur Maximilien (1867); Le Quatre-septembre et le gouvernement de la défense nationale (1872); Mourad V. (1878), and several volumes of memoirs.

KERBELA, or Meshed-Ḥosain, a town of Asiatic Turkey, the capital of a sanjak of the Bagdad vilayet, situated on the extreme western edge of the alluvial river plain, about 60 m. S.S.W. of Bagdad and 20 m. W. of the Euphrates, from which a canal extends almost to the town. The surrounding territory is fertile and well cultivated, especially in fruit gardens and palm-groves. The newer parts of the city are built with broad streets and sidewalks, presenting an almost European appearance. The inner town, surrounded by a dilapidated brick wall, at the gates of which octroi duties are still levied, is a dirty Oriental city, with the usual narrow streets. Kerbela owes its existence to the fact that Ḥosain, a son of ‘Ali, the fourth caliph, was slain here by the soldiers of Yazid, the rival aspirant to the caliphate, on the 10th of October A.D. 680 (see Caliphate, sec. B, § 2). The most important feature of the town is the great shrine of Ḥosain, containing the tomb of the martyr, with its golden dome and triple minarets, two of which are glided. Kerbela is a place of pilgrimage of the Shi’ite Moslems, and is only less sacred to them than Meshed ‘Ali and Mecca. Some 200,000 pilgrims from the Shi’ite portions of Islam are said to journey annually to Kerbela, many of them carrying the bones of their relatives to be buried in its sacred soil, or bringing their sick and aged to die there in the odour of sanctity. The mullahs, who fix the burial fees, derive an enormous revenue from the faithful. Formerly Kerbela was a self-governing hierarchy and constituted an inviolable sanctuary for criminals; but in 1843 the Turkish 754 government undertook to deprive the city of some of these liberties and to enforce conscription. The Kerbelese resisted, and Kerbela was bombarded (hence the ruined condition of the old walls) and reduced with great slaughter. Since then it has formed an integral part of the Turkish administration of Irak. The enormous influx of pilgrims naturally creates a brisk trade in Kerbela and the towns along the route from Persia to that place and beyond to Nejef. The population of Kerbela, necessarily fluctuating, is estimated at something over 60,000, of whom the principal part are Shi’ites, chiefly Persians, with a goodly mixture of British Indians. No Jews or Christians are allowed to reside there.
KERBALA, or Meshed-Hossein, is a town in Turkey, the capital of a district of the Bagdad region, located at the far western edge of the river plain, about 60 miles S.S.W. of Bagdad and 20 miles W. of the Euphrates, from which a canal runs almost to the town. The surrounding area is fertile and well-farmed, especially with fruit gardens and palm groves. The newer parts of the city feature wide streets and sidewalks, giving it an almost European look. The old town, surrounded by a crumbling brick wall, where octroi duties are still collected at the gates, is a typical dirty Eastern city filled with narrow streets. Kerbela exists because Ḥosain, a son of ‘Ali, the fourth caliph, was killed here by Yazid’s soldiers, a rival to the caliphate, on October 10, CE 680 (see Caliphate, sec. B, § 2). The most notable site in the town is the grand shrine of Ḥosain, which houses the martyr’s tomb, featuring a golden dome and three minarets, two of which are gilded. Kerbela serves as a pilgrimage site for Shi’ite Muslims, and is regarded as nearly as sacred to them as Meshed ‘Ali and Mecca. About 200,000 pilgrims from Shi’ite regions of Islam are said to visit Kerbela each year, many bringing the remains of relatives to be buried in its holy ground, or bringing their sick and elderly to pass away in a place of sanctity. The mullahs, who set the burial costs, earn a significant income from the faithful. In the past, Kerbela was an autonomous hierarchy and served as a safe haven for criminals; however, in 1843, the Turkish 754 government sought to limit some of these freedoms and enforce conscription. The people of Kerbela resisted, resulting in a bombardment of the city (which led to the current state of the old walls) with substantial loss of life. Since then, it has been an integral part of the Turkish administration of Irak. The large number of pilgrims naturally boosts trade in Kerbela and the towns along the route from Persia to there and further to Nejef. The population of Kerbela, which fluctuates, is estimated at over 60,000, with the majority being Shi’ites, primarily Persians, along with a significant number of British Indians. No Jews or Christians are permitted to live there.
See Chodzko, Théâtre persan (Paris, 1878); J. P. Peters, Nippur (1897).
See Chodzko, Théâtre persan (Paris, 1878); J. P. Peters, Nippur (1897).

KERCH, or Kertch, a seaport of S. Russia, in the government of Taurida, on the Strait of Kerch or Yenikale, 60 m. E.N.E. of Theodosia, in 45° 21′ N. and 36° 30′ E. Pop. (1897), 31,702. It stands on the site of the ancient Panticapaeum, and, like most towns built by the ancient Greek colonists in this part of the world, occupies a beautiful situation, clustering round the foot and climbing up the sides of the hill (called after Mithradates) on which stood the ancient citadel or acropolis. The church of St John the Baptist, founded in 717, is a good example of the early Byzantine style. That of Alexander Nevsky was formerly the Kerch museum of antiquities, founded in 1825. The more valuable objects were subsequently removed to the Hermitage at St Petersburg, while those that remained at Kerch were scattered during the English occupation in the Crimean War. The existing museum is a small collection in a private house. Among the products of local industry are leather, tobacco, cement, beer, aerated waters, lime, candles and soap. Fishing is carried on, and there are steam saw-mills and flour-mills. A rich deposit of iron ore was discovered close to Kerch in 1895, and since then mining and blasting have been actively prosecuted. The mineral mud-baths, one of which is in the town itself and the other beside Lake Chokrak (9 m. distant), are much frequented. Notwithstanding the deepening of the strait, so that ships are now able to enter the Sea of Azov, Kerch retains its importance for the export trade in wheat, brought thither by coasting vessels. Grain, fish, linseed, rapeseed, wool and hides are also exported. About 6 m. N.E. are the town and old Turkish fortress of Yenikale, administratively united with Kerch. Two and a half miles to the south are strong fortified works defending the entrance to the Sea of Azov.
KERCH, or Kertch, is a seaport in southern Russia, located in the Taurida region, on the Strait of Kerch or Yenikale, 60 miles E.N.E. of Theodosia, at coordinates 45° 21′ N. and 36° 30′ E. As of 1897, the population was 31,702. It sits on the site of the ancient Panticapaeum and, like most towns established by ancient Greek colonists in this area, boasts a stunning location, nestled at the base and climbing up the slopes of the hill named after Mithradates, where the old citadel or acropolis once stood. The church of St John the Baptist, founded in 717, is a fine example of early Byzantine architecture. The church of Alexander Nevsky used to be the Kerch museum of antiquities, established in 1825. Most valuable items were later transferred to the Hermitage in St. Petersburg, while the remaining artifacts in Kerch were scattered during the English occupation in the Crimean War. The current museum is a small collection housed in a private residence. Local industries produce leather, tobacco, cement, beer, carbonated beverages, lime, candles, and soap. Fishing activities are conducted, and there are steam sawmills and flour mills. A rich deposit of iron ore was found near Kerch in 1895, leading to active mining and blasting operations. The mineral mud baths, one located in the town and the other next to Lake Chokrak (9 miles away), are frequently visited. Despite the deepening of the strait, allowing ships to enter the Sea of Azov, Kerch remains significant for exporting wheat brought in by coastal vessels. Additionally, grain, fish, linseed, rapeseed, wool, and hides are also exported. Approximately 6 miles N.E. lie the town and old Turkish fortress of Yenikale, which is administratively part of Kerch. Two and a half miles to the south are strong fortifications protecting the entrance to the Sea of Azov.
The Greek colony of Panticapaeum was founded about the middle of the 6th century B.C., by the town of Miletus. From about 438 B.C. till the conquest of this region by Mithradates the Great, king of Pontus, about 100 B.C., the town and territory formed the kingdom of the Bosporus, ruled over by an independent dynasty. Phanaces, the son of Mithradates, became the founder of a new line under the protection of the Romans, which continued to exist till the middle of the 4th century A.D., and extended its power over the maritime parts of Tauris. After that the town—which had already begun to be known as Bospora—passed successively into the hands of the Eastern empire, of the Khazars, and of various barbarian tribes. In 1318, the Tatars, who had come into possession in the previous century, ceded the town to the Genoese, who soon raised it into new importance as a commercial centre. They usually called the place Cerchio, a corruption of the Russian name K’rtchev (whence Kerch), which appears in the 11th century inscription of Tmutarakan (a Russian principality at the north foot of the Caucasus). Under the Turks, whose rule dates from the end of the 15th century, Kerch was a military port; and as such it plays a part in the Russo-Turkish wars. Captured by the Russians under Dolgorukov in 1771, it was ceded to them along with Yenikale by the peace of Kuchuk-Kainarji, and it became a centre of Russian naval activity. Its importance was greatly impaired by the rise of Odessa and Taganrog; and in 1820 the fortress was dismantled. Kerch suffered severely during the Crimean War.
The Greek colony of Panticapaeum was established around the middle of the 6th century B.C. by the town of Miletus. From about 438 B.C. until the region was conquered by Mithradates the Great, king of Pontus, around 100 B.C., the town and its territory were part of the kingdom of the Bosporus, governed by an independent dynasty. Phanaces, Mithradates's son, founded a new line under Roman protection, which lasted until the middle of the 4th century A.D. and expanded its influence over the coastal areas of Tauris. After that, the town—now starting to be referred to as Bospora—changed hands multiple times, coming under the control of the Eastern Empire, the Khazars, and various barbarian tribes. In 1318, the Tatars, who had taken control in the previous century, handed the town over to the Genoese, who quickly revitalized it as a commercial hub. They typically called the place Cerchio, a corrupted form of the Russian name K’rtchev (which led to the modern Kerch), found in an 11th-century inscription from Tmutarakan (a Russian principality at the northern foothills of the Caucasus). Under Turkish rule, which began in the late 15th century, Kerch became a military port and played a role in the Russo-Turkish wars. Captured by the Russians under Dolgorukov in 1771, it was ceded to them along with Yenikale through the peace treaty of Kuchuk-Kainarji, becoming a hub for Russian naval operations. Its significance declined with the rise of Odessa and Taganrog, and by 1820 the fortress was dismantled. Kerch endured significant hardships during the Crimean War.
Archaeologically Kerch is of particular interest, the kurgans or sepulchral mounds of the town and vicinity having yielded a rich variety of the most beautiful works of art. Since 1825 a large number of tombs have been opened. In the Altun or Zolotai-oba (Golden Mound) was found a great stone vault similar in style to an Egyptian pyramid; and within, among many objects of minor note, were golden dishes adorned with griffins and beautiful arabesques. In the Kul-oba, or Mound of Cinders (opened in 1830-1831), was a similar tomb, in which were found what would appear to be the remains of one of the kings of Bosporus, of his queen, his horse and his groom. The ornaments and furniture were of the most costly kind; the king’s bow and buckler were of gold; his very whip intertwined with gold; the queen had golden diadems, necklace and breast-jewels, and at her feet lay a golden vase. In the Pavlovskoi kurgan (opened in 1858) was the tomb of a Greek lady, containing among other articles of dress and decoration a pair of fine leather boots (a unique discovery) and a beautiful vase on which is painted the return of Persephone from Hades and the setting out of Triptolemus for Attica. In a neighbouring tomb was what is believed to be “the oldest Greek mural painting which has come down to us,” dating probably from the 4th century B.C. Among the minor objects discovered in the kurgans perhaps the most noteworthy are the fragments of engraved boxwood, the only examples known of the art taught by the Sicyonian painter Pamphilus.
Archaeologically, Kerch is particularly intriguing, as the kurgans or burial mounds in the town and surrounding areas have uncovered a stunning variety of beautiful artworks. Since 1825, many tombs have been excavated. In the Altun or Zolotai-oba (Golden Mound), a large stone vault was discovered that resembles an Egyptian pyramid; inside, alongside numerous minor items, were golden dishes decorated with griffins and exquisite arabesques. The Kul-oba, or Mound of Cinders (excavated in 1830-1831), contained a similar tomb, where what appears to be the remains of a king of Bosporus, his queen, their horse, and the groom were found. The ornaments and furnishings were incredibly lavish; the king’s bow and shield were made of gold, and even his whip was entwined with gold. The queen possessed golden diadems, a necklace, and breast jewels, with a golden vase resting at her feet. In the Pavlovskoi kurgan (excavated in 1858), the tomb of a Greek lady was found, which included, among other clothing and decorative items, a unique pair of fine leather boots and a striking vase depicting Persephone's return from Hades and Triptolemus setting out for Attica. In a nearby tomb was what is thought to be "the oldest Greek mural painting that has survived," likely dating from the 4th century B.C. Among the smaller items uncovered in the kurgans, the most notable are perhaps the fragments of engraved boxwood, the only known examples of the art taught by the Sicyonian painter Pamphilus.
Very important finds of old Greek art continue to be made in the neighbourhood, as well as at Tamañ, on the east side of the Strait of Kerch. The catacombs on the northern slope of Mithradates Hill, of which nearly 200 have been explored since 1859, possess considerable interest, not only for the relics of old Greek art which some of them contain (although most were plundered in earlier times), but especially as material for the history and ethnography of the Cimmerian Bosporus. In 1890 the first Christian catacomb bearing a distinct date (491) was discovered. Its walls were covered with Greek inscriptions and crosses.
Very significant discoveries of ancient Greek art keep being made in the area, as well as at Tamañ, on the east side of the Strait of Kerch. The catacombs on the northern slope of Mithradates Hill, nearly 200 of which have been explored since 1859, are quite interesting, not only for the remnants of ancient Greek art that some of them include (even though most were looted in earlier times), but especially as resources for the history and ethnography of the Cimmerian Bosporus. In 1890, the first Christian catacomb with a specific date (491) was found. Its walls were covered in Greek inscriptions and crosses.
See H. D. Seymour’s Russia on the Black Sea and Sea of Azoff (London, 1855); J. B. Telfer, The Crimea (London, 1876); P. Bruhn, Tchernomore, 1852-1877 (Odessa, 1878); Gilles, Antiquités du Bosphore Cimmérien (1854); D. Macpherson, Antiquities of Kertch (London, 1857); Compte rendu de la Commission Imp. Archéologique (St Petersburg); L. Stephani, Die Alterthümer vom Kertsch (St Petersburg, 1880); C. T. Newton, Essays on Art and Archaeology (London, 1880); Reports of the [Russian] Imp. Archaeological Commission; Izvestia (Bulletin) of the Archives Commission for Taurida; Antiquités du Bosphore Cimmérien, conservées au Musée Impérial de l’Ermitage (St Petersburg, 1854); Inscriptiones antiquae orae septentrionalis Ponti Euxini graecae et latinae, with a preface by V. V. Latyshev (St Petersburg, 1890); Materials for the Archaeology of Russia, published by the Imp. Arch. Commission (No. 6, St Petersburg, 1891).
See H. D. Seymour’s Russia on the Black Sea and Sea of Azoff (London, 1855); J. B. Telfer, The Crimea (London, 1876); P. Bruhn, Tchernomore, 1852-1877 (Odessa, 1878); Gilles, Antiquités du Bosphore Cimmérien (1854); D. Macpherson, Antiquities of Kertch (London, 1857); Compte rendu de la Commission Imp. Archéologique (St Petersburg); L. Stephani, Die Alterthümer vom Kertsch (St Petersburg, 1880); C. T. Newton, Essays on Art and Archaeology (London, 1880); Reports of the [Russian] Imp. Archaeological Commission; Izvestia (Bulletin) of the Archives Commission for Taurida; Antiquités du Bosphore Cimmérien, conservées au Musée Impérial de l’Ermitage (St Petersburg, 1854); Inscriptiones antiquae orae septentrionalis Ponti Euxini graecae et latinae, with a foreword by V. V. Latyshev (St Petersburg, 1890); Materials for the Archaeology of Russia, published by the Imp. Arch. Commission (No. 6, St Petersburg, 1891).

KERCKHOVEN, JAN POLYANDER VAN DEN (1568-1646), Dutch Protestant divine, was born at Metz, in 1568. He became French preacher at Dort in 1591, and afterwards succeeded Franz Gomarus as professor of theology at Leiden. He was invited by the States General of Holland to revise the Dutch translation of the Bible, and it was he who edited the canons of the synod of Dort (1618-1619).
KERCKHOVEN, JAN POLYANDER VAN DEN (1568-1646), Dutch Protestant minister, was born in Metz in 1568. He became a French preacher in Dort in 1591 and later took over from Franz Gomarus as a theology professor at Leiden. He was invited by the States General of Holland to revise the Dutch Bible translation, and he edited the canons of the Synod of Dort (1618-1619).
His many published works include Responsio ad sophismata A. Cocheletii doctoris surbonnistae (1610), Dispute contre l’adoration des reliques des Saincts trespassés (1611), Explicatio somae prophetae (1625).
His many published works include Responsio ad sophismata A. Cocheletii doctoris surbonnistae (1610), Dispute contre l’adoration des reliques des Saincts trespassés (1611), Explicatio somae prophetae (1625).

KERGUELEN ISLAND, Kerguelen’s Land, or Desolation Island, an island in the Southern Ocean, to the S.E. of the Cape of Good Hope, and S.W. of Australia, and nearly half-way between them. Kerguelen lies between 48° 39′ and 49° 44′ S. and 68° 42′ and 70° 35′ E. Its extreme length is about 85 m., but the area is only about 1400 sq. m. The island is throughout mountainous, presenting from the sea in some directions the appearance of a series of jagged peaks. The various ridges and mountain masses are separated by steep-sided valleys, which run down to the sea, forming deep fjords, so that no part of the interior is more than 12 m. from the sea. The chief summits are Mounts Ross (6120 ft.), Richards (4000), Crozier (3251), Wyville Thomson (3160), Hooker (2600), Moseley (2400). The coast-line is extremely irregular, and the fjords, at least on the north, east and south, form a series of well-sheltered harbours. As the prevailing winds are westerly, the safest anchorage is on the north-east. Christmas Harbour on the north and Royal Sound on the south are noble harbours, the latter with a labyrinth of islets interspersed over upwards of 20 m. of land-locked waters. The scenery is generally magnificent. A district of considerable extent in the centre of the island is occupied 755 by snowfields, whence glaciers descend east and west to the sea. The whole island, exclusive of the snowfields, abounds in freshwater lakes and pools in the hills and lower ground. Hidden deep mudholes are frequent.
KERGUELEN ISLAND, Kerguelen Island, or Desolate Island, is an island in the Southern Ocean, southeast of the Cape of Good Hope and southwest of Australia, roughly halfway between the two. Kerguelen lies between 48° 39′ and 49° 44′ S, and 68° 42′ and 70° 35′ E. Its maximum length is about 85 miles, but the area is only about 1,400 square miles. The island is entirely mountainous, showing from the sea in some directions as a series of jagged peaks. The various ridges and mountain ranges are separated by steep-sided valleys that descend to the sea, creating deep fjords, so no part of the interior is more than 12 miles from the ocean. The main peaks are Mounts Ross (6,120 ft.), Richards (4,000 ft.), Crozier (3,251 ft.), Wyville Thomson (3,160 ft.), Hooker (2,600 ft.), and Moseley (2,400 ft.). The coastline is very irregular, and the fjords, particularly on the north, east, and south sides, create a series of well-sheltered harbors. With prevailing winds coming from the west, the safest anchorage is in the northeast. Christmas Harbour on the north and Royal Sound on the south are impressive harbors, the latter featuring a maze of islets spread across over 20 miles of protected waters. The scenery is generally breathtaking. A large area in the center of the island is covered by snowfields, where glaciers flow down east and west toward the sea. The entire island, excluding the snowfields, is filled with freshwater lakes and pools in the hills and lower areas. Hidden muddy pits are also common.
Kerguelen Island is of undoubted volcanic origin, the prevailing rock being basaltic lavas, intersected occasionally by dikes, and an active volcano and hot springs are said to exist in the south-west of the island. Judging from the abundant fossil remains of trees, the island must have been thickly clothed with woods and other vegetation of which it has no doubt been denuded by volcanic action and submergence, and possibly by changes of climate. It presents evidences of having been subjected to powerful glaciation, and to subsequent immersion and immense denudation. The soundings made by the “Challenger” and “Gazelle” and the affinities which in certain respects exist between the islands, seem to point to the existence at one time of an extensive land area in this quarter, of which Kerguelen, Prince Edward’s Islands, the Crozets, St Paul and Amsterdam are the remains. The Kerguelen plateau rises in many parts to within 1500 fathoms of the surface of the sea. Beds of coal and of red earth are found in some places. The summits of the flat-topped hills about Betsy Cove, in the south-east of the island, are formed of caps of basalt.
Kerguelen Island is definitely of volcanic origin, with the main rock being basaltic lava, occasionally intersected by dikes. There's said to be an active volcano and hot springs in the southwest part of the island. Based on the abundant fossil remnants of trees, the island must have once been densely covered with woods and other vegetation, which have likely been stripped away by volcanic activity, submergence, and possibly climate changes. It shows signs of having experienced intense glaciation, followed by significant immersion and erosion. The soundings taken by the “Challenger” and “Gazelle,” along with the similarities that certain islands share, suggest that there was once a large landmass in this area, of which Kerguelen, Prince Edward Islands, the Crozets, St Paul, and Amsterdam are now remnants. The Kerguelen plateau rises to about 1500 fathoms below sea level in several areas. Coal beds and red earth can be found in some spots. The flat-topped hills around Betsy Cove in the southeast of the island are capped with basalt.
According to Sir J. D. Hooker the vegetation of Kerguelen Island is of great antiquity; and may have originally reached it from the American continent; it has no affinities with Africa. The present climate is not favourable to permanent vegetation; the island lies within the belt of rain at all seasons of the year, and is reached by no drying winds; its temperature is kept down by the surrounding vast expanse of sea, and it lies within the line of the cold Antarctic drift. The temperature, however, is equable. The mean annual temperature is about 39° F., while the summer temperature has been observed to approach 70°. Tempests and squalls are frequent, and the weather is rarely calm. On the lower slopes of the mountains a rank vegetation exists, which, from the conditions mentioned, is constantly saturated with moisture. A rank grass, Festuca Cookii, grows thickly in places up to 300 ft., with Azorella, Cotula plumosa, &c. Sir J. D. Hooker enumerated twenty-one species of flowering plants, and seven of ferns, lycopods, and Characeae; at least seventy-four species of mosses, twenty-five of Hepaticae, and sixty-one of lichens are known, and there are probably many more. Several of the marine and many species of freshwater algae are peculiar to the island. The characteristic feature of the vegetation, the Kerguelen’s Land cabbage, was formerly abundant, but has been greatly reduced by rabbits introduced on to the island. Fur-seals are still found in Kerguelen, though their numbers have been reduced by reckless slaughter. The sea-elephant and sea-leopard are characteristic. Penguins of various kinds are abundant; a teal (Querquedula Eatoni) peculiar to Kerguelen and the Crozets is also found in considerable numbers, and petrels, especially the giant petrel (Ossifraga gigantea), skuas, gulls, sheath-bills (Chionis minor), albatross, terns, cormorants and Cape pigeons frequent the island. There is a considerable variety of insects, many of them with remarkable peculiarities of structure, and with a predominance of forms incapable of flying.
According to Sir J. D. Hooker, the vegetation of Kerguelen Island is very old and may have originally come from the American continent; it has no connections to Africa. The current climate isn't great for permanent vegetation; the island is constantly in the rain belt throughout the year and isn't influenced by drying winds. Its temperature is kept low by the vast sea surrounding it, and it falls within the path of the cold Antarctic drift. However, the temperature is stable. The average annual temperature is about 39° F, while summer temperatures have been noted to rise close to 70°. Storms and gales are common, and calm weather is rare. On the lower slopes of the mountains, there's lush vegetation, which, due to the conditions mentioned, is always wet. A thick grass, Festuca Cookii, grows abundantly in places up to 300 ft, along with Azorella, Cotula plumosa, and others. Sir J. D. Hooker listed twenty-one species of flowering plants and seven types of ferns, lycopods, and Characeae; at least seventy-four species of mosses, twenty-five of Hepaticae, and sixty-one of lichens have been documented, and there are likely many more. Several marine species and many freshwater algae are unique to the island. The most notable plant, Kerguelen's Land cabbage, used to be plentiful but has significantly decreased due to the rabbits brought to the island. Fur seals can still be found in Kerguelen, but their numbers have been greatly diminished due to excessive hunting. The sea elephant and sea leopard are distinct features. Various kinds of penguins are abundant; a teal (Querquedula Eatoni) unique to Kerguelen and the Crozets is also present in large numbers, along with petrels, especially the giant petrel (Ossifraga gigantea), skuas, gulls, sheath-bills (Chionis minor), albatrosses, terns, cormorants, and Cape pigeons visiting the island. There's a significant variety of insects, many with unusual structural features, with a majority of them being flightless.
The island was discovered by the French navigator, Yves Joseph de Kerguelen-Trémarec, a Breton noble (1745-1797), on the 13th of February 1772, and partly surveyed by him in the following year. He was one of those explorers who had been attracted by the belief in a rich southern land, and this island, the South France of his first discovery, was afterwards called by him Desolation Land in his disappointment. Captain Cook visited the island in 1776, and, among other expeditions, the “Challenger” spent some time here, and its staff visited and surveyed various parts of it in January 1874. It was occupied from October 1874 to February 1875 by the expeditions sent from England, Germany and the United States to observe the transit of Venus. The German South Polar expedition in 1901-1902 established a meteorological and magnetic station at Royal Sound, under Dr Enzensperger, who died there. In January 1893 Kerguelen was annexed by France, and its commercial exploitation was assigned to a private company.
The island was discovered by the French navigator, Yves Joseph de Kerguelen-Trémarec, a Breton noble (1745-1797), on February 13, 1772, and he partially surveyed it the following year. He was one of those explorers drawn in by the belief in a rich southern land, and this island, the South France of his initial discovery, was later named Desolation Land by him due to his disappointment. Captain Cook visited the island in 1776, and among other expeditions, the “Challenger” spent some time here, with its crew visiting and surveying various parts of it in January 1874. It was occupied from October 1874 to February 1875 by expeditions sent from England, Germany, and the United States to observe the transit of Venus. The German South Polar expedition in 1901-1902 set up a meteorological and magnetic station at Royal Sound, led by Dr. Enzensperger, who died there. In January 1893, Kerguelen was annexed by France, and its commercial exploitation was handed over to a private company.
See Y. J. de Kerguelen-Trémarec, Relation de deux voyages dans les mers australes (Paris, 1782); Narratives of the Voyages of Captain Cook and the “Challenger” Expedition; Phil. Trans., vol. 168, containing account of the collections made in Kerguelen by the British transit of Venus expedition in 1874-1875; Lieutard, “Mission aux îles Kerguelen,” &c., Annales hydrographiques (Paris, 1893).
See Y. J. de Kerguelen-Trémarec, Relation de deux voyages dans les mers australes (Paris, 1782); Narratives of the Voyages of Captain Cook and the “Challenger” Expedition; Phil. Trans., vol. 168, containing account of the collections made in Kerguelen by the British transit of Venus expedition in 1874-1875; Lieutard, “Mission aux îles Kerguelen,” &c., Annales hydrographiques (Paris, 1893).

KERGUELEN’S LAND CABBAGE, in botany, Pringlea antiscorbutica (natural order Cruciferae), a plant resembling in habit, and belonging to the same family as, the common cabbage (Brassica oleracea). The cabbage-like heads of leaves abound in a pale yellow highly pungent essential oil, which gives the plant a peculiar flavour but renders it extremely wholesome. It was discovered by Captain Cook during his first voyage, but the first account of it was published by (Sir) Joseph Hooker in The Botany of the Antarctic Voyage of the “Erebus” and “Terror” in 1839-1843. During the stay of the latter expedition on the island, daily use was made of this vegetable either cooked by itself or boiled with the ship’s beef, pork or pea-soup. Hooker observes of it, “This is perhaps the most interesting plant procured during the whole of the voyage performed in the Antarctic Sea, growing as it does upon an island the remotest of any from a continent, and yielding, besides this esculent, only seventeen other flowering plants.”
KERGUELEN’S LAND CABBAGE, in botany, Pringlea antiscorbutica (natural order Cruciferae), is a plant that looks similar to and is part of the same family as the common cabbage (Brassica oleracea). The cabbage-like heads of leaves are rich in a pale yellow, highly pungent essential oil, which gives the plant a unique flavor and makes it very nutritious. It was discovered by Captain Cook during his first voyage, but the first account of it was published by (Sir) Joseph Hooker in The Botany of the Antarctic Voyage of the “Erebus” and “Terror” in 1839-1843. During the stay of the latter expedition on the island, this vegetable was used daily, either cooked on its own or boiled with the ship’s beef, pork, or pea soup. Hooker remarks, “This is perhaps the most interesting plant procured during the whole of the voyage performed in the Antarctic Sea, growing as it does upon an island the remotest of any from a continent, and yielding, besides this edible, only seventeen other flowering plants.”

KERKUK, or Qerqūq, the chief town of a sanjak in the Mosul vilayet of Asiatic Turkey, situated among the foot hills of the Kurdistan Mountains at an elevation of about 1100 ft. on both banks of the Khassa Chai, a tributary of the Tigris, known in its lower course as Adhem. Pop. estimated at 12,000 to 15,000, chiefly Mahommedan Kurds. Owing to its position at the junction of several routes, Kerkuk has a brisk transit trade in hides, Persian silks and cottons, colouring materials, fruit and timber; but it owes its principal importance to its petroleum and naphtha springs. There are also natural warm springs at Kerkuk, used to supply baths and reputed to have valuable medical properties. In the neighbourhood of the city is a burning mountain, locally famous for many centuries. Kerkuk is evidently an ancient site, the citadel standing upon an artificial mound 130 ft. high. It was a metropolitan see of the Chaldean Christians. There is a Jewish quarter beneath the citadel, and the reputed sarcophagi of Daniel and the Hebrew children are shown in one of the mosques.
KERKUK, or Qerqūq, is the main town of a district in the Mosul region of Turkey, located among the foothills of the Kurdistan Mountains at about 1100 ft. elevation on both sides of the Khassa Chai, a tributary of the Tigris, known further down as Adhem. The population is estimated to be between 12,000 and 15,000, primarily Muslim Kurds. Due to its location at the crossroads of several routes, Kerkuk has a lively transit trade in hides, Persian silks and cottons, dyes, fruits, and timber; however, its main significance comes from its petroleum and naphtha springs. There are also natural hot springs in Kerkuk, which are used for baths and are believed to have valuable healing properties. Near the city, there's a burning mountain that has been locally famous for centuries. Kerkuk is clearly an ancient site, with the citadel located on an artificial mound 130 ft. high. It was once the main see for the Chaldean Christians. There is a Jewish quarter beneath the citadel, and the purported tombs of Daniel and the Hebrew children are found in one of the mosques.

KERMADEC, a small group of hilly islands in the Pacific, about 30° S., 178° W., named from D’Entrecasteaux’s captain, Huon Kermadec, in 1791. They are British possessions. The largest of the group is Raoul or Sunday Island, 20 m. in circumference, 1600 ft. high, and thickly wooded. The flora and fauna belong for the most part to those of New Zealand, on which colony the islands are also politically dependent, having been annexed in 1887.
KERMADEC, is a small group of hilly islands in the Pacific, located around 30° S., 178° W., named after D’Entrecasteaux’s captain, Huon Kermadec, in 1791. They are British territories. The largest island in the group is Raoul or Sunday Island, which has a circumference of 20 miles, stands 1,600 feet high, and is densely forested. The plants and animals mostly resemble those of New Zealand, as the islands are also politically linked to that colony, having been annexed in 1887.

KERMAN (the ancient Karmania), a province of Persia, bounded E. by Seistan and Baluchistan, S. by Baluchistan and Fars, W. by Fars, and N. by Yezd and Khorasan. It is of very irregular shape, expanding in the north to Khorasan and gradually contracting in the south to a narrow wedge between Fars and Baluchistan; the extreme length between Seistan and Fars (E. and W.) is about 400 m., the greatest breadth (N. and S.) from south of Yezd to the neighbourhood of Bander Abbasi about 300 m., and the area is estimated at about 60,000 sq. m. Kerman is generally described as consisting of two parts, an uninhabitable desert region in the north and a habitable mountainous region in the south, but recent explorations require this view to be considerably modified. There are mountains and desert tracts in all parts, while much of what appears on maps as forming the western portion of the great Kerman desert consists of the fertile uplands of Kuhbanan, Raver and others stretching along the eastern base of the lofty range which runs from Yezd south-east to Khabis. West of and parallel to this range are two others, one culminating north-west of Bam in the Kuh Hazar (14,700 ft.), the other continued at about the same elevation under the name of the Jamal Bariz (also Jebel Bariz) south-eastward to Makran. These chains traverse fertile districts dividing them into several longitudinal valleys of considerable length, but not averaging more than 12 m. in width. Snow lies on them for a considerable part of the year, feeding the springs and canals by means of which large tracts in this almost rainless region in summer are kept under cultivation. Still farther west the Kuh Dina range is continued from Fars, also in a south-easterly direction to Bashakird beyond Bander Abbasi. Between the south-western highlands and the Jamal Bariz there is some arid and unproductive land, but the true desert of Kerman lies mainly in the north and north-east, where it merges northwards in the great desert “Lut,” which stretches into 756 Khorasan.1 These southern deserts differ from the kavir of central Persia mainly in three respects: they are far less saline, are more sandy and drier, and present in some places tracts of 80 to 100 miles almost absolutely destitute of vegetation. Yet they are crossed by well-known tracks running from Kerman eastwards and north-eastwards to Seistan and Khorasan and frequently traversed by caravans. It appears that these sandy wastes are continually encroaching on the fertile districts, and this is the case even in Narmashir, which is being invaded by the sands of the desolate plains extending thence north-westwards to Bam. There are also some kefeh or salt swamps answering to the kavir in the north, but occurring only in isolated depressions and nowhere of any great extent. The desert of Kerman lies about 1000 ft., or less, above the sea, apparently on nearly the same level as the Lut, from which it cannot be geographically separated. The climate, which varies much with the relief of the land, has the reputation of being unhealthy, because the cool air from the hills is usually attended by chills and agues. Still many of the upland valleys enjoy a genial and healthy climate. The chief products are cotton, gums, dates of unrivalled flavour from the southern parts, and wool, noted for its extreme softness, and the soft underhair of goats (kurk), which latter are used in the manufacture of the Kerman shawls, which in delicacy of texture yield only to those of Kashmir, while often surpassing them in design, colour and finish. Besides woollen goods (shawls, carpets, &c.) Kerman exports mainly cotton, grain and dates, receiving in return from India cotton goods, tea, indigo, china, glass, sugar, &c. Wheat and barley are scarce. Bander Abbasi is the natural outport; but, since shipping has shown a preference for Bushire farther west, the trade of Kerman has greatly fallen off.
KERMAN (the ancient Karmania), a province of Persia, is bordered on the east by Seistan and Baluchistan, on the south by Baluchistan and Fars, on the west by Fars, and on the north by Yezd and Khorasan. Its shape is very irregular, expanding in the north toward Khorasan and gradually tapering in the south into a narrow wedge between Fars and Baluchistan; the maximum length from Seistan to Fars (east to west) is about 400 miles, the widest point (north to south) from just south of Yezd to the area around Bander Abbasi is about 300 miles, and the total area is estimated at around 60,000 square miles. Kerman is generally thought of as having two parts: a barren desert area in the north and a mountainous region in the south that is suitable for habitation, but recent studies have significantly changed this perspective. Mountains and desert regions exist throughout, and much of what is shown on maps as the western section of the vast Kerman desert actually includes the fertile highlands of Kuhbanan, Raver, and others, stretching along the eastern base of the tall mountain range that runs from Yezd southeast to Khabis. West of this range, and parallel to it, there are two others: one peaks north-west of Bam at Kuh Hazar (14,700 ft.), while the other continues at a similar height under the name of Jamal Bariz (or Jebel Bariz) heading southeast towards Makran. These mountain ranges cut through fertile areas, dividing them into several long valleys that are noticeable, but typically no more than 12 miles wide. Snow sits on the mountains for a considerable part of the year, feeding springs and irrigation canals that allow large areas in this almost rainless region to be cultivated in the summer. Further west, the Kuh Dina range extends from Fars, also moving southeast toward Bashakird beyond Bander Abbasi. Between the southwestern highlands and the Jamal Bariz, there are some dry and unproductive lands, but the real desert of Kerman is mostly in the north and northeast, where it blends into the vast "Lut" desert that stretches into 756 Khorasan.1 These southern deserts differ from the kavir of central Persia mainly in three ways: they are much less saline, more sandy and drier, and in some areas, there are stretches of 80 to 100 miles that are nearly completely lacking in vegetation. However, they are crossed by well-known routes leading from Kerman eastward and northeastward to Seistan and Khorasan, and are frequently used by caravans. These sandy deserts seem to be slowly encroaching on fertile areas, even in Narmashir, which is facing the advance of sands from the barren plains stretching northwest to Bam. There are also some kefeh or salt swamps similar to the kavir in the north, but they occur only in isolated depressions and are not extensive. The Kerman desert sits about 1000 feet, or lower, above sea level, seemingly on the same level as the Lut, from which it cannot be geographically distinguished. The climate varies greatly depending on the terrain and has a reputation for being unhealthy, as the cool air from the hills often brings chills and fevers. Still, many of the upland valleys enjoy a mild and healthy climate. The main products include cotton, resins, dates of exceptional quality from the southern areas, and wool known for its extreme softness, as well as the soft underhair of goats (kurk), which are used in making Kerman shawls, known for their delicacy, second only to those from Kashmir, while often exceeding them in design, color, and finish. In addition to woolen goods like shawls and carpets, Kerman mainly exports cotton, grain, and dates, receiving cotton goods, tea, indigo, china, glass, sugar, etc., in return from India. Wheat and barley are scarce. Bander Abbasi serves as the natural seaport; however, since shipping has favored Bushire further west, Kerman's trade has significantly declined.
For administrative purposes the province is divided into nineteen districts, one being the capital of the same name with its immediate neighbourhood (humeh); the others are Akta and Urzu; Anar; Bam and Narmashir; Bardsir; Jiruft; Khabis; Khinaman; Kubenan (Kuhbanan); Kuhpayeh; Pariz; Rafsinjan; Rahbur; Raver; Rayin; Rudbar and Bashakird; Sardu; Sirjan; Zerend. The inhabitants number about 700,000, nearly one-third being nomads.
For administrative purposes, the province is divided into nineteen districts, with one being the capital of the same name and its immediate surroundings (humeh); the others are Akta and Urzu; Anar; Bam and Narmashir; Bardsir; Jiruft; Khabis; Khinaman; Kubenan (Kuhbanan); Kuhpayeh; Pariz; Rafsinjan; Rahbur; Raver; Rayin; Rudbar and Bashakird; Sardu; Sirjan; Zerend. The population is about 700,000, with nearly one-third being nomads.

KERMAN, capital of the above province, situated in 30° 17′ N., 56° 59′ E., at an elevation of 6100 ft. Its population is estimated at 60,000, including about 2000 Zoroastrians, 100 Jews, and a few Shikarpuri Indians. Kerman has post and telegraph offices (Indo-European Telegraph Department), British and Russian consulates, and an agency of the Imperial bank of Persia. The neighbouring districts produce little grain and have to get their supplies for four or five months of the year from districts far away. A traveller has stated that it was easier to get a mann (6½ ℔) of saffron at Kerman than a mann of barley for his horse, and in 1879 Sir A. Houtum-Schindler was ordered by the authorities to curtail his excursions in the province “because his horses and mules ate up all the stock.” Kerman manufactures great quantities of carpets and felts, and its carpets are almost unsurpassed for richness of texture and durability. The old name of the city was Guvashir. Adjoining the city on hills rising 400 to 500 ft. above the plain in the east are the ruins of two ancient forts with walls built of sun-dried bricks on stone foundations. Some of the walls are in perfect condition. Among the mosques in the city two deserve special notice, one the Masjid i Jama, a foundation of the Muzaffarid ruler Mubariz ed din Mahommed dating from A.H. 1349, the other the Masjid i Malik built by Malik Kaverd Seljuk (1041-1072).
KERMAN, is the capital of the province mentioned above, located at 30° 17′ N., 56° 59′ E., with an elevation of 6100 ft. Its population is estimated to be around 60,000, which includes about 2000 Zoroastrians, 100 Jews, and a few Shikarpuri Indians. Kerman has post and telegraph offices (Indo-European Telegraph Department), British and Russian consulates, and a branch of the Imperial Bank of Persia. The nearby districts produce very little grain and have to source their supplies from far away for four or five months of the year. A traveler noted that it was easier to get a mann (6½ ℔) of saffron in Kerman than a mann of barley for his horse, and in 1879, Sir A. Houtum-Schindler was instructed by the authorities to limit his explorations in the province “because his horses and mules consumed all the stock.” Kerman produces a large quantity of carpets and felts, and its carpets are nearly unrivaled in texture and durability. The city's old name was Guvashir. To the east, on hills rising 400 to 500 ft. above the plain, are the ruins of two ancient forts with walls made of sun-dried bricks on stone foundations. Some sections of the walls are still in excellent condition. Among the city’s mosques, two are particularly noteworthy: the Masjid i Jama, established by the Muzaffarid ruler Mubariz ed din Mahommed in A.H. 1349, and the Masjid i Malik built by Malik Kaverd Seljuk (1041-1072).

KERMANSHAH, or Kermanshahan, an important province of Persia, situated W. of Hamadan, N. of Luristan, and S. of Kurdistan, and extending in the west to the Turkish frontier. Its population is about 400,000, and it pays a yearly revenue of over £20,000. Many of its inhabitants are nomadic Kurds and Lurs who pay little taxes. The plains are well watered and very fertile, while the hills are covered with rich pastures which support large flocks of sheep and goats. The sheep provide a great part of the meat supply of Teheran. The province also produces much wheat and barley, and could supply great quantities for export if the means of transport were better.
Kermanshah, or Kermanshah, is an important province of Persia, located west of Hamadan, north of Luristan, and south of Kurdistan, extending west to the Turkish border. Its population is around 400,000, and it generates an annual revenue of over £20,000. Many of its residents are nomadic Kurds and Lurs who pay minimal taxes. The plains are well-watered and very fertile, while the hills are covered in lush pastures that sustain large flocks of sheep and goats. The sheep provide a significant portion of the meat supply for Teheran. The province also produces a lot of wheat and barley and could export large quantities if transportation options improved.
Kermanshah (Kermisin of Arab geographers), the capital of the province, is situated at an elevation of 5100 ft., in 34° 19′ N., and 46° 59′ E., about 220 m. from Bagdad, and 250 m. from Teheran. Although surrounded by fortifications with five gates and three miles in circuit, it is now practically an open town, for the walls are in ruins and the moat is choked with rubbish. It has a population of about 40,000. The town is situated on the high road between Teheran and Bagdad, and carries on a transit trade estimated in value at £750,000 per annum.
Kermanshah (Kermisin as called by Arab geographers), the capital of the province, is located at an elevation of 5,100 feet, at 34° 19′ N, and 46° 59′ E, about 220 miles from Baghdad and 250 miles from Tehran. Although it's surrounded by walls with five gates and a perimeter of three miles, it’s basically an open town now, as the walls are in ruins and the moat is filled with debris. The population is around 40,000. The town is positioned on the main road between Tehran and Baghdad, with a transit trade valued at about £750,000 a year.

KERMES (Arab. qirmiz; see Crimson), a crimson dye-stuff, now superseded by cochineal, obtained from Kermes ilicis (= Coccus ilicis, Lat. = C. vermilio, G. Planchon). The genus Kermes belongs to the Coccidae or Scale-insects, and its species are common on oaks wherever they grow. The species from which kermes is obtained is common in Spain, Italy and the South of France and the Mediterranean basin generally, where it feeds on Quercus coccifera, a small shrub. As in the case of other scale-insects, the males are relatively small and are capable of flight, while the females are wingless. The females of the genus Kermes are remarkable for their gall-like form, and it was not until 1714 that their animal nature was discovered.
KERMES (Arabic qirmiz; see Crimson), a crimson dye, now replaced by cochineal, comes from Kermes ilicis (= Coccus ilicis, Latin = C. vermilio, G. Planchon). The genus Kermes is part of the Coccidae or scale insects, and its species are found on oak trees wherever they grow. The species used for kermes is common in Spain, Italy, and the southern parts of France and the Mediterranean, where it feeds on Quercus coccifera, a small shrub. Like other scale insects, males are relatively small and can fly, while females lack wings. Female Kermes are notable for their gall-like shape, and it wasn’t until 1714 that their animal nature was identified.
In the month of May, when full grown, the females are globose, 6 to 7 millim. in diameter, of a reddish-brown colour, and covered with an ash-coloured powder. They are found attached to the twigs or buds by a circular lower surface 2 millim. in diameter, and surrounded by a narrow zone of white cottony down. At this time there are concealed under a cavity, formed by the approach of the abdominal wall of the insect to the dorsal one, thousands of eggs of a red colour, and smaller than poppy seed, which are protruded and ranged regularly beneath the insect. At the end of May or the beginning of June the young escape by a small orifice, near the point of attachment of the parent. They are then of a fine red colour, elliptic and convex in shape, but rounded at the two extremities, and bear two threads half as long as their body at their posterior extremity. At this period they are extremely active, and swarm with extraordinary rapidity all over the food plant, and in two or three days attach themselves to fissures in the bark or buds, but rarely to the leaves. In warm and dry summers the insects breed again in the months of August and September, according to Eméric, and then they are more frequently found attached to the leaves. Usually they remain immovable and apparently unaltered until the end of the succeeding March, when their bodies become gradually distended and lose all trace of abdominal rings. They then appear full of a reddish juice resembling discoloured blood. In this state, or when the eggs are ready to be extruded, the insects are collected. In some cases the insects from which the young are ready to escape are dried in the sun on linen cloths—care being taken to prevent the escape of the young from the cloths until they are dead. The young insects are then sifted from the shells, made into a paste with vinegar, and dried on skins exposed to the sun, and the paste packed in skins is then ready for exportation to the East under the name of “pâte d’écarlate.”
In May, when fully grown, the females are round, measuring 6 to 7 millimeters in diameter, reddish-brown in color, and covered with a grayish powder. They're attached to twigs or buds by a round base that’s 2 millimeters wide, surrounded by a narrow ring of white cottony fluff. At this time, thousands of small red eggs, smaller than poppy seeds, are hidden in a cavity created by the insect's abdomen pressing against its back. The eggs are pushed out and neatly arranged under the insect. At the end of May or the beginning of June, the young emerge through a small opening near where the parent is attached. They are bright red, oval, and rounded at both ends, with two threads at their back that are half the length of their body. During this period, they are very active and quickly swarm over the food plant, attaching themselves to cracks in the bark or buds within two or three days, but rarely to the leaves. In warm and dry summers, the insects breed again in August and September, according to Eméric, and are often found attached to the leaves. They usually stay still and seemingly unchanged until the end of the following March, when their bodies begin to swell, losing all evidence of abdominal segments. They then look full of a reddish liquid that resembles discolored blood. In this state, or when the eggs are ready to be laid, the insects are collected. Sometimes, the insects about to release their young are laid out to dry in the sun on linen cloths, ensuring the young don't escape until they are dead. The young insects are then sifted from the shells, mixed into a paste with vinegar, and dried on skins in the sun. The finished paste is packed in skins and prepared for export to the East under the name "pâte d’écarlate."
In the pharmacopoeia of the ancients kermes triturated with vinegar was used as an outward application, especially in wounds of the nerves. From the 9th to the 16th century this insect formed an ingredient in the “confectio alkermes,” a well known medicine, at one time official in the London pharmacopoeia as an astringent in doses of 20 to 60 grains or more. Syrup of kermes was also prepared. Both these preparations have fallen into disuse.
In ancient medicine, kermes mixed with vinegar was used as a topical treatment, especially for nerve wounds. From the 9th to the 16th century, this insect was a key ingredient in “confectio alkermes,” a well-known medicine that was once officially recognized in the London pharmacopoeia as an astringent in doses of 20 to 60 grains or more. Syrup of kermes was also made. Both of these preparations are no longer commonly used.
Mineral kermes is trisulphide of antimony, containing a variable portion of trioxide of antimony both free and combined with alkali. It was known as poudre des Chartreux because in 1714 it is said to have saved the life of a Carthusian monk who had been given up by the Paris faculty; but the monk Simon who administered it on that occasion called it Alkermes mineral. Its reputation became so great that in 1720 the French government bought the recipe for its preparation. It still appears in the pharmacopoeias of many European countries and in that of the United States. The product varies somewhat according to the mode of preparation adopted. According to the French directions the official substance is obtained by adding 60 grammes of powdered antimony trisulphide to a boiling solution of 1280 grammes of crystallized sodium carbonate in 12,800 grammes of distilled water and boiling for one hour. The liquid is then filtered hot, and on being allowed to cool slowly deposits the 757 kermes, which is washed and dried at 100° C.; prepared in this way it is a brown-red velvety powder, insoluble in water.
Mineral kermes is antimony trisulphide, containing a varying amount of antimony trioxide that is both free and combined with alkali. It was known as poudre des Chartreux because in 1714 it reportedly saved the life of a Carthusian monk who had been given up by the Paris faculty; however, the monk Simon who used it that time called it Alkermes mineral. Its reputation became so significant that in 1720, the French government purchased the recipe for its preparation. It still appears in the pharmacopoeias of many European countries and in that of the United States. The product varies somewhat depending on the preparation method. According to the French instructions, the official substance is made by adding 60 grams of powdered antimony trisulphide to a boiling solution of 1280 grams of crystallized sodium carbonate in 12,800 grams of distilled water and boiling for one hour. The liquid is then filtered while hot, and upon cooling slowly, it deposits the 757 kermes, which is then washed and dried at 100° C.; when prepared this way, it is a brown-red velvety powder that is insoluble in water.
See G. Planchon, Le Kermes du chêne (Montpellier, 1864); Lewis, Materia Medica (1784), pp. 71, 365; Memorias sobre la grana Kermes de España (Madrid, 1788); Adams, Paulus Aegineta, iii. 180; Beckmann, History of Inventions.
See G. Planchon, Le Kermes du chêne (Montpellier, 1864); Lewis, Materia Medica (1784), pp. 71, 365; Memorias sobre la grana Kermes de España (Madrid, 1788); Adams, Paulus Aegineta, iii. 180; Beckmann, History of Inventions.

KERMESSE (also Kermis and Kirmess), originally the mass said on the anniversary of the foundation of a church and in honour of the patron, the word being equivalent to “Kirkmass.” Such celebrations were regularly held in the Low Countries and also in northern France, and were accompanied by feasting, dancing and sports of all kinds. They still survive, but are now practically nothing more than country fairs and the old allegorical representations are uncommon. The Brussels Kermesse is, however, still marked by a procession in which the effigies of the Mannikin and medieval heroes are carried. At Mons the Kermesse occurs annually on Trinity Sunday and is called the procession of Lumeçon (Walloon for limaçon, a snail): the hero is Gilles de Chin, who slays a terrible monster, captor of a princess, in the Grand Place. This is the story of George and the Dragon. At Hasselt the Kermesse (now only septennial) not only commemorates the Christian story of the foundation of the town, but even preserves traces of a pagan festival. The word Kermesse (generally in the form “Kirmess” ) is applied in the United States to any entertainment, especially one organized in the interest of charity.
KERMESSE (also Fair and Kirmess), originally referred to the mass celebrated on the anniversary of a church's foundation and in honor of its patron, with the term being equivalent to “Kirkmass.” These celebrations were commonly held in the Low Countries and northern France and included feasting, dancing, and various sports. They still exist today, but now they are mostly just country fairs, and the old allegorical performances are rare. However, the Brussels Kermesse still features a procession with effigies of the Mannikin and medieval heroes. In Mons, the Kermesse takes place annually on Trinity Sunday and is known as the procession of Lumeçon (Walloon for limaçon, meaning snail): the hero is Gilles de Chin, who defeats a terrifying monster that captured a princess in the Grand Place. This story parallels that of George and the Dragon. In Hasselt, the Kermesse (now only every seven years) not only commemorates the Christian narrative of the town's founding but also retains elements of a pagan festival. The term Kermesse (usually in the form “Kirmess”) is used in the United States to describe any entertainment, especially events organized for charitable purposes.
See Demetrius C. Boulger, Belgian Life in Town and Country (1904).
See Demetrius C. Boulger, Belgian Life in Town and Country (1904).

KERN, JAN HENDRIK (1833- ), Dutch Orientalist, was born in Java of Dutch parents on the 6th of April 1833. He studied at Utrecht, Leiden and Berlin, where he was a pupil of the Sanskrit scholar, Albrecht Weber. After some years spent as professor of Greek at Maestricht, he became professor of Sanskrit at Benares in 1863, and in 1865 at Leiden. His studies included the Malay languages as well as Sanskrit. His chief work is Geschiedenis van het Buddhisme in Indië (Haarlem, 2 vols., 1881-1883); in English he wrote a translation (Oxford, 1884) of the Saddharma Pundarîka and a Manual of Indian Buddhism (Strassburg, 1896) for Bühler Kielhorn’s Grundriss der indoarischen Philologie.
KERN, JAN HENDRIK (1833- ), Dutch Orientalist, was born in Java to Dutch parents on April 6, 1833. He studied at Utrecht, Leiden, and Berlin, where he was a student of the Sanskrit scholar Albrecht Weber. After spending several years as a professor of Greek at Maestricht, he became a professor of Sanskrit in Benares in 1863, and then at Leiden in 1865. His studies included Malay languages as well as Sanskrit. His main work is Geschiedenis van het Buddhisme in Indië (Haarlem, 2 vols., 1881-1883); in English, he translated the Saddharma Pundarîka (Oxford, 1884) and wrote a Manual of Indian Buddhism (Strassburg, 1896) for Bühler Kielhorn’s Grundriss der indoarischen Philologie.

KERNEL (O.E. cyrnel, a diminutive of “corn,” seed, grain), the soft and frequently edible part contained within the hard outer husk of a nut or the stone of a fruit; also used in botany of the nucleus of a seed, the body within its several integuments or coats, and generally of the nucleus or core of any structure; hence, figuratively, the pith or gist of any matter.
KERNEL (O.E. cyrnel, a small form of “corn,” seed, grain), the soft and often edible part inside the hard outer shell of a nut or the pit of a fruit; it's also used in botany to refer to the nucleus of a seed, the body within its various layers or shells, and generally the core or center of any structure; thus, it can figuratively mean the essence or main point of any topic.

KERNER, JUSTINUS ANDREAS CHRISTIAN (1786-1862), German poet and medical writer, was born on the 18th of September 1786 at Ludwigsburg in Württemberg. After attending the classical schools of Ludwigsburg and Maulbronn, he was apprenticed in a cloth factory, but, in 1804, owing to the good services of Professor Karl Philipp Conz (1762-1827) of Tübingen, was enabled to enter the university there; he studied medicine but had also time for literary pursuits in the company of Uhland, Gustav Schwab and others. He took his doctor’s degree in 1808, spent some time in travel, and then settled as a practising physician in Wildbad. Here he completed his Reiseschatten von dem Schattenspieler Luchs (1811), in which his own experiences are described with caustic humour. He next co-operated with Uhland and Schwab in producing the Poetischer Almanack für 1812, which was followed by the Deutscher Dichterwald (1813), and in these some of Kerner’s best poems were published. In 1815 he obtained the official appointment of district medical officer (Oberamtsarzt) in Gaildorf, and in 1818 was transferred in a like capacity to Weinsberg, where he spent the rest of his life. His house, the site of which at the foot of the historical Schloss Weibertreu was presented by the municipality to their revered physician, became the Mecca of literary pilgrims. Hospitable welcome was extended to all, from the journeyman artisan to crowned heads. Gustavus IV. of Sweden came thither with a knapsack on his back. The poets Count Christian Friedrich Alexander von Württemberg (1801-1844) and Lenau (q.v.) were constant guests, and thither came also in 1826 Friederike Hauffe (1801-1829), the daughter of a forester in Prevorst, a somnambulist and clairvoyante, who forms the subject of Kerner’s famous work Die Seherin von Prevorst, Eröffnungen über das innere Leben des Menschen und über das Hineinragen einer Geisterwelt in die unsere (1829; 6th ed., 1892). In 1826 he published a collection of Gedichte which were later supplemented by Der letzte Blütenstrauss (1852) and Winterblüten (1859). Among others of his well-known poems are the charming ballad Der reichste Fürst; a drinking song, Wohlauf, noch getrunken, and the pensive Wanderer in der Sägemühle.
KERNER, JUSTINUS ANDREAS CHRISTIAN (1786-1862), German poet and medical writer, was born on September 18, 1786, in Ludwigsburg, Württemberg. After attending classical schools in Ludwigsburg and Maulbronn, he started an apprenticeship in a cloth factory. However, in 1804, thanks to the support of Professor Karl Philipp Conz (1762-1827) from Tübingen, he was able to enter the university there. He studied medicine but also had time for literary activities alongside Uhland, Gustav Schwab, and others. He earned his doctorate in 1808, traveled for a while, and then settled down as a practicing physician in Wildbad. Here, he finished his Reiseschatten von dem Schattenspieler Luchs (1811), where he humorously recounts his own experiences. He then collaborated with Uhland and Schwab on the Poetischer Almanack für 1812, which was followed by the Deutscher Dichterwald (1813), where some of Kerner’s best poems were published. In 1815, he was officially appointed as the district medical officer (Oberamtsarzt) in Gaildorf, and in 1818 he was moved to Weinsberg in the same role, where he spent the rest of his life. His home, located at the foot of the historical Schloss Weibertreu, was gifted by the municipality to their esteemed physician and became a gathering place for literary visitors. He warmly welcomed everyone, from skilled artisans to royalty. Gustavus IV of Sweden even visited with a backpack on his back. Poets Count Christian Friedrich Alexander von Württemberg (1801-1844) and Lenau (q.v.) were regular guests, and in 1826, Friederike Hauffe (1801-1829), the daughter of a forester in Prevorst, who was a somnambulist and clairvoyant, visited. She is featured in Kerner’s famous work Die Seherin von Prevorst, Eröffnungen über das innere Leben des Menschen und über das Hineinragen einer Geisterwelt in die unsere (1829; 6th ed., 1892). In 1826, he published a collection of Gedichte that was later expanded by Der letzte Blütenstrauss (1852) and Winterblüten (1859). Among his other well-known poems are the lovely ballad Der reichste Fürst; a drinking song, Wohlauf, noch getrunken, and the reflective Wanderer in der Sägemühle.
In addition to his literary productions, Kerner wrote some popular medical books of great merit, dealing with animal magnetism, a treatise on the influence of sebacic acid on animal organisms, Das Fettgift oder die Fettsäure und ihre Wirkungen auf den tierischen Organismus (1822); a description of Wildbad and its healing waters, Das Wildbad im Königreich Württemberg (1813); while he gave a pretty and vivid account of his youthful years in Bilderbuch aus meiner Knabenzeit (1859); and in Die Bestürmung der württembergischen Stadt Weinsberg im Jahre 1525 (1820), showed considerable skill in historical narrative. In 1851 he was compelled, owing to increasing blindness, to retire from his medical practice, but he lived, carefully tended by his daughters, at Weinsberg until his death on the 21st of February 1862. He was buried beside his wife, who had predeceased him in 1854, in the churchyard of Weinsberg, and the grave is marked by a stone slab with an inscription he himself had chosen: Friederike Kerner und ihr Justinus. Kerner was one of the most inspired poets of the Swabian school. His poems, which largely deal with natural phenomena, are characterized by a deep melancholy and a leaning towards the supernatural, which, however, is balanced by a quaint humour, reminiscent of the Volkslied.
In addition to his literary works, Kerner wrote several popular medical books of significant value, focusing on animal magnetism, a treatise on the effect of sebacic acid on animal organisms, Das Fettgift oder die Fettsäure und ihre Wirkungen auf den tierischen Organismus (1822); a description of Wildbad and its healing waters, Das Wildbad im Königreich Württemberg (1813); while he offered a delightful and vivid account of his childhood in Bilderbuch aus meiner Knabenzeit (1859); and in Die Bestürmung der württembergischen Stadt Weinsberg im Jahre 1525 (1820), he demonstrated considerable skill in historical storytelling. In 1851, he was forced to retire from his medical practice due to worsening blindness, but he lived, carefully cared for by his daughters, in Weinsberg until his death on February 21, 1862. He was buried beside his wife, who passed away in 1854, in the churchyard of Weinsberg, and their grave is marked by a stone slab with an inscription he chose himself: Friederike Kerner und ihr Justinus. Kerner was one of the most inspired poets of the Swabian school. His poems, which primarily focus on natural phenomena, are known for their deep melancholy and a tendency towards the supernatural, which, however, is balanced by a charming humor reminiscent of the folk song.
Kerner’s Ausgewählte poetische Werke appeared in 2 vols. (1878); Sämtliche poetische Werke, ed. by J. Gaismaier, 4 vols. (1905); a selection of his poems will also be found in Reclam’s Universalbibliothek (1898). His correspondence was edited by his son in 1897. See also D. F. Strauss, Kleine Schriften (1866); A. Reinhard, J. Kerner und das Kernerhaus zu Weinsberg (1862; 2nd ed., 1886); G. Rümelin, Reden und Aufsätze, vol. iii. (1894); M. Niethammer (Kerner’s daughter), J. Kerners Jugendliebe und mein Vaterhaus (1877); A. Watts, Life and Works of Kerner (London, 1884); T. Kerner, Das Kernerhaus und seine Gäste (1894).
Kerner’s Selected Poetic Works was published in 2 volumes in 1878; All Poetic Works, edited by J. Gaismaier, came out in 4 volumes in 1905; a selection of his poems can also be found in Reclam’s Universal Library from 1898. His correspondence was edited by his son in 1897. See also D. F. Strauss, Small Writings (1866); A. Reinhard, J. Kerner and the Kerner House in Weinsberg (1862; 2nd ed., 1886); G. Rümelin, Speeches and Essays, vol. iii (1894); M. Niethammer (Kerner’s daughter), J. Kerner’s First Love and My Family Home (1877); A. Watts, Life and Works of Kerner (London, 1884); T. Kerner, The Kerner House and Its Guests (1894).

KERRY, a county of Ireland in the province of Munster, bounded W. by the Atlantic Ocean, N. by the estuary of the Shannon, which separates it from Clare, E. by Limerick and Cork, and S.E. by Cork. The area is 1,159,356 acres, or 1811 sq. m., the county being the fifth of the Irish counties in extent. Kerry, with its combination of mountain, sea and plain, possesses some of the finest scenery of the British Islands. The portion of the county south of Dingle Bay consists of mountain masses intersected by narrow valleys. Formerly the mountains were covered by a great forest of fir, birch and yew, which was nearly all cut down to be used in smelting iron, and the constant pasturage of cattle prevents the growth of young trees. In the north-east towards Killarney the hills rise abruptly into the ragged range of Macgillicuddy’s Reeks, the highest summit of which, Carntual (Carrantuohill), has a height of 3414 ft. The next highest summit is Caper (3200 ft.), and several others are over 2500 ft. Lying between the precipitous sides of the Tomies, the Purple Mountains and the Reeks is the famous Gap of Dunloe. In the Dingle promontory Brandon Mountain attains a height of 3127 ft. The sea-coast, for the most part wild and mountainous, is much indented by inlets, the largest of which, Tralee Bay, Dingle Bay and Kenmare River, lie in synclinal troughs, the anticlinal folds of the rocks forming extensive promontories. Between Kenmare River and Dingle Bay the land is separated by mountain ridges into three valleys. The extremity of the peninsula between Dingle Bay and Tralee Bay is very precipitous, and Mount Brandon, rising abruptly from the ocean, is skirted at its base (in part) by a road from which magnificent views are obtained. From near the village of Ballybunion to Kilconey Point near the Shannon there is a remarkable succession 758 of caves, excavated by the sea. One of these caves inspired Tennyson with some lines in “Merlin and Vivien,” which he wrote on the spot. The principal islands are the picturesque Skelligs, Valencia Island and the Blasquet Islands.
KERRY, is a county in Ireland located in the province of Munster, bordered to the west by the Atlantic Ocean, to the north by the estuary of the Shannon, which sets it apart from Clare, to the east by Limerick and Cork, and to the southeast by Cork. The total area is 1,159,356 acres, or 1,811 square miles, making it the fifth largest county in Ireland. Kerry, with its mix of mountains, sea, and plains, features some of the most stunning scenery in the British Isles. The part of the county south of Dingle Bay is made up of mountain masses divided by narrow valleys. In the past, these mountains were covered by a vast forest of fir, birch, and yew, which was mostly cleared for iron smelting, and the ongoing grazing of cattle prevents young trees from growing. In the northeast near Killarney, the hills rise steeply into the jagged range of Macgillicuddy’s Reeks, with its highest peak, Carntual (Carrantuohill), reaching 3,414 feet. The next highest peak is Caper (3,200 feet), and several others are over 2,500 feet. Nestled between the steep slopes of the Tomies, the Purple Mountains, and the Reeks is the famous Gap of Dunloe. On the Dingle peninsula, Brandon Mountain rises to a height of 3,127 feet. The coastline, mostly wild and mountainous, has many inlets, the largest being Tralee Bay, Dingle Bay, and Kenmare River, which lie in synclinal troughs, with the anticlinal folds of the rocks creating extensive promontories. Between Kenmare River and Dingle Bay, mountain ridges divide the land into three valleys. The tip of the peninsula between Dingle Bay and Tralee Bay is very steep, and Mount Brandon rises sharply from the ocean, partially bordered at its base by a road that offers breathtaking views. From near the village of Ballybunion to Kilconey Point by the Shannon, there is an impressive series of caves carved by the sea. One of these caves inspired Tennyson to write some lines in “Merlin and Vivien,” which he composed on-site. The main islands include the picturesque Skelligs, Valencia Island, and the Blasquet Islands.
The principal rivers are the Blackwater, which, rising in the Dunkerran Mountains, forms for a few miles the boundary line between Kerry and Cork, and then passes into the latter county; the Ruaughty, which with a course resembling the arc of a circle falls into the head of the Kenmare River; the Inny and Ferta, which flow westward, the one into Ballinskellig Bay and the other into Valencia harbour; the Flesk, which flows northward through the lower Lake of Killarney, after which it takes the name of Laune, and flows north-westward to Dingle Bay; the Caragh, which rises in the mountains of Dunkerran, after forming several lakes falls into Castlemaine harbour; the Maine, which flows from Castle Island and south-westward to the sea at Castlemaine harbour, receiving the northern Flesk, which rises in the mountains that divide Cork from Kerry; and the Feale, Gale and Brick, the junction of which forms the Cashin, a short tidal river which flows into the estuary of the Shannon. The lakes of Kerry are not numerous, and none is of great size, but those of Killarney (q.v.) form one of the most important features in the striking and picturesque mountain scenery amidst which they are situated. The other principal lakes are Lough Currane (Waterville Lake) near Ballinskellig, and Lough Caragh near Castlemaine harbour. Salmon and trout fishing with the rod is extensively prosecuted in all these waters. Near the summit of Mangerton Mountain an accumulation of water in a deep hollow forms what is known as the Devil’s Punchbowl, the surplus water, after making a succession of cataracts, flowing into Muckross Lake at the foot of the mountain. There are chalybeate mineral springs near Killarney, near Valencia Island, and near the mouth of the Inny; sulphurous chalybeate springs near Dingle, Castlemaine and Tralee; and a saline spring at Magherybeg in Corkaguiney, which bursts out of clear white sand a little below high-water mark. Killarney is an inland centre widely celebrated and much visited on account of its scenic attractions; there are also several well-known coast resorts, among them Derrynane, at the mouth of Kenmare Bay, the residence of Daniel O’Connell the “liberator”; Glenbeigh on Dingle Bay, Parknasilla on Kenmare Bay, Waterville (an Atlantic telegraph station) between Ballinskellig Bay and Lough Currane, and Tarbert, a small coast town on the Shannon estuary. Others of the smaller villages have grown into watering-places, such as Ballybunion, Castlegregory and Portmagee.
The main rivers include the Blackwater, which starts in the Dunkerran Mountains, briefly forms the boundary between Kerry and Cork, and then flows into Cork; the Ruaughty, which follows a curved path and empties into the Kenmare River; the Inny and Ferta, which head west, with one flowing into Ballinskellig Bay and the other into Valencia Harbour; the Flesk, which travels north through the lower Lake of Killarney before becoming Laune and continuing northwest to Dingle Bay; the Caragh, originating in the Dunkerran mountains, which creates several lakes before entering Castlemaine Harbour; the Maine, flowing from Castle Island to the sea at Castlemaine Harbour, taking in the northern Flesk from the mountains that separate Cork and Kerry; and the Feale, Gale, and Brick rivers, which converge to form the Cashin, a short tidal river flowing into the Shannon estuary. The lakes in Kerry are few and none is very large, but the Killarney lakes (q.v.) are a key feature in the dramatic and beautiful mountain landscape they inhabit. Other major lakes include Lough Currane (Waterville Lake) near Ballinskellig and Lough Caragh close to Castlemaine Harbour. Salmon and trout fishing is popular in all these waters. Near the top of Mangerton Mountain, water collects in a deep hollow, creating the Devil’s Punchbowl, with the excess water cascading into Muckross Lake at the mountain's base. There are chalybeate mineral springs close to Killarney, near Valencia Island, and at the mouth of the Inny; sulphurous chalybeate springs near Dingle, Castlemaine, and Tralee; and a saline spring at Magherybeg in Corkaguiney, which bubbles up from clear white sand just below the high-water mark. Killarney is a popular inland destination known for its scenic beauty; there are also several famous coastal resorts, including Derrynane at the mouth of Kenmare Bay, the home of Daniel O’Connell the “Liberator”; Glenbeigh on Dingle Bay; Parknasilla on Kenmare Bay; Waterville (an Atlantic telegraph station) between Ballinskellig Bay and Lough Currane; and Tarbert, a small coastal town on the Shannon estuary. Other smaller villages have developed into popular vacation spots, such as Ballybunion, Castlegregory, and Portmagee.
Geology.—Kerry includes on the north and east a considerable area of Carboniferous shales and sandstones, reaching the coal-measures, with unproductive coals, east of Listowel and on the Glanruddery Mountains. The Carboniferous Limestone forms a fringe to these beds, and is cut off by the sea at Knockaneen Bay, Tralee and Castlemaine. In all the great promontories, Old Red Sandstone, including Jukes’s “Glengariff Grits,” forms the mountains, while synclinal hollows of Carboniferous Limestone have become submerged to form marine inlets between them. The Upper Lake of Killarney lies in a hollow of the Old Red Sandstone, which here rises to its greatest height in Macgillicuddy’s Reeks; Lough Leane however, with its low shores, rests on Carboniferous Limestone. In the Dingle promontory the Old Red Sandstone is strikingly unconformable on the Dingle beds and the Upper Silurian series; the latter include volcanic rocks of Wenlock age. The evidences of local glaciation in this county, especially on the wild slopes of the mountains, are as striking as in North Wales. A copper-mine was formerly worked at Muckross, near Killarney, in which cobalt ores also occurred. Slate is quarried in Valencia Island.
Geology.—Kerry has a large area of Carboniferous shales and sandstones in the north and east, reaching the coal measures, which contain nonproductive coal, east of Listowel and on the Glanruddery Mountains. The Carboniferous Limestone forms a border around these layers and is cut off by the sea at Knockaneen Bay, Tralee, and Castlemaine. In all the major promontories, Old Red Sandstone, including Jukes’s “Glengariff Grits,” makes up the mountains, while synclinal hollows of Carboniferous Limestone have been submerged to create marine inlets between them. The Upper Lake of Killarney sits in a hollow of the Old Red Sandstone, which reaches its peak height in Macgillicuddy’s Reeks; however, Lough Leane, with its low shores, rests on Carboniferous Limestone. On the Dingle promontory, the Old Red Sandstone is notably unconformable over the Dingle beds and the Upper Silurian series; the latter includes volcanic rocks of Wenlock age. Evidence of local glaciation in this county, particularly on the rugged slopes of the mountains, is as remarkable as in North Wales. A copper mine was once operated at Muckross, near Killarney, where cobalt ores were also found. Slate is quarried on Valencia Island.
Fauna.—Foxes are numerous, and otters and badgers are not uncommon. The alpine hare is very abundant. The red deer inhabits the mountains round Killarney. The golden eagle, once frequently seen in the higher mountain regions, is now rarely met. The sea eagle haunts the lofty marine cliffs, the mountains and the rocky islets. The osprey is occasionally seen, and also the peregrine falcon. The merlin is common. The common owl is indigenous, the long-eared owl resident, and the short-eared owl a regular winter visitor. Rock pigeons breed on the sea-cliffs, and the turtle-dove is an occasional visitant. The great grey seal is found in Brandon and Dingle bays.
Fauna.—Foxes are plentiful, and otters and badgers are not rare. The alpine hare is very common. The red deer lives in the mountains around Killarney. The golden eagle, which was once frequently seen in the higher mountain areas, is now rarely spotted. The sea eagle frequents the high marine cliffs, mountains, and rocky islets. The osprey is sometimes seen, as well as the peregrine falcon. The merlin is common. The common owl is native, the long-eared owl is a resident, and the short-eared owl visits regularly in winter. Rock pigeons breed on the sea cliffs, and the turtle dove is an occasional visitor. The great grey seal can be found in Brandon and Dingle bays.
Climate and Agriculture.—Owing to the vicinity of the sea and the height of the mountains, the climate is very moist and unsuitable for the growth of cereals, but it is so mild even in winter that arbutus and other trees indigenous to warm climates grow in the open air, and several flowering plants are found which are unknown in England. In the northern parts the land is generally coarse and poor, except in the valleys, where a rich soil has been formed by rocky deposits. In the Old Red Sandstone valleys there are many very fertile regions, and several extensive districts now covered by bog admit of easy reclamation so as to form very fruitful soil, but other tracts of boggy land scarcely promise a profitable return for labour expended on their reclamation. Over one-third of the total area is quite barren. The numbers of live stock of every kind are generally increased or sustained. Dairy-farming is very largely followed. The Kerry breed of cattle—small finely-shaped animals, black or red in colour, with small upturned horns—are famed for the quality both of their flesh and milk, and are in considerable demand for the parks surrounding mansion-houses. The “Dexter,” a cross between the Kerry and an unknown breed, is larger but without its fine qualities. Little regard is paid to the breed of sheep, but those in most common use have been crossed with a merino breed from Spain. Goats share with sheep the sweet pasturage of the higher mountain ridges, while cattle occupy the lower slopes.
Climate and Agriculture.—Because of its proximity to the sea and the height of the mountains, the climate is very moist and not ideal for growing grains. However, it's mild enough in winter that arbutus and other trees native to warmer climates can thrive outdoors, along with several flowering plants that aren’t found in England. In the northern areas, the land is generally rough and poor, except in the valleys where a rich soil has formed from rocky deposits. The Old Red Sandstone valleys have many very fertile regions, and several large areas now covered by bog can easily be reclaimed to create very productive soil. However, other boggy areas offer little promise for a profitable return on the effort put into reclaiming them. Over a third of the total area is completely barren. The number of livestock of all types is generally increasing or being sustained. Dairy farming is a major activity. The Kerry breed of cattle—small, well-shaped animals, either black or red with small upturned horns—are well-known for their quality meat and milk, and are in high demand for the parks around large estates. The “Dexter,” a cross between the Kerry and an unknown breed, is larger but doesn’t have the same fine qualities. There isn’t much attention given to sheep breeds, but the most common ones have been crossed with a merino breed from Spain. Goats share the sweet pastures of the higher mountain ridges with sheep, while cattle are found on the lower slopes.
Other Industries.—In former times there was a considerable linen trade in Kerry, but this is now nearly extinct, the chief manufacture being that of coarse woollens and linens for home use. At Killarney a variety of articles are made from the wood of the arbutus. A considerable trade in agricultural produce is carried on at Tralee, Dingle and Kenmare, and in slate and stone at Valencia. The deep-sea and coast fisheries are prosperous, and there are many small fishing settlements along the coast, but the centres of the two fishery districts are Valencia and Dingle. Salmon fishing is also an industry, for which the district centres are Kenmare and Killarney.
Other Industries.—In the past, there was a significant linen trade in Kerry, but this is now almost gone, with the main production focusing on coarse wool and linens for local use. In Killarney, various products are made from the wood of the arbutus tree. There is a notable trade in agricultural products in Tralee, Dingle, and Kenmare, as well as in slate and stone at Valencia. The deep-sea and coastal fishing industries are thriving, with many small fishing communities along the coast, but the main hubs for the two fishing regions are Valencia and Dingle. Salmon fishing is also a prominent industry, particularly centered in Kenmare and Killarney.
Communications.—The Great Southern & Western railway almost monopolizes the lines in the county. The principal line traverses the centre of the county, touching Killarney, Tralee and Listowel, and passing ultimately to Limerick. Branches are from Headford to Kenmare; Farranfore to Killorglin, Cahersiveen and Valencia harbour, Tralee to Fenit and to Castlegregory; and the Listowel and Ballybunion railway. All these are lines to the coast. The Tralee and Dingle railway connects these two towns. The only inland branch is from Tralee to Castleisland.
Communications.—The Great Southern & Western Railway nearly dominates the rail lines in the county. The main line runs through the center of the county, connecting Killarney, Tralee, and Listowel, and ultimately leading to Limerick. There are branches from Headford to Kenmare; Farranfore to Killorglin, Cahersiveen, and Valencia Harbour; Tralee to Fenit and Castlegregory; and the Listowel and Ballybunion railway. All of these lines go to the coast. The Tralee and Dingle railway links these two towns. The only inland branch is from Tralee to Castleisland.
Population and Administration.—The population (179,136 in 1891; 165,726 in 1901) decreases to an extent about equal to the average of the Irish counties, but the emigration returns are among the heaviest. The chief towns are Tralee (the county town, pop. 9867); Killarney (5656), Listowel (3605) and Cahersiveen or Cahirciveen (2013), while Dingle, Kenmare, Killorglin and Castleisland are smaller towns. The county comprises 9 baronies, and contains 85 civil parishes. Assizes are held at Tralee, and quarter sessions at Cahersiveen, Dingle, Kenmare, Killarney, Listowel and Tralee. The headquarters of the constabulary force is at Tralee. Previous to the Union the county returned eight members to the Irish parliament, two for the county, and two for each of the boroughs of Tralee, Dingle and Ardfert. At the Union the number was reduced to three, two for the county and one for the borough of Tralee; but the divisions now number four: north, south, east and west, each returning one member. The county is in the Protestant diocese of Limerick and the Roman Catholic dioceses of Kerry and Limerick.
Population and Administration.—The population (179,136 in 1891; 165,726 in 1901) is decreasing at a rate similar to the average of the Irish counties, but emigration rates are among the highest. The main towns are Tralee (the county town, pop. 9,867); Killarney (5,656), Listowel (3,605), and Cahersiveen or Cahirciveen (2,013), while Dingle, Kenmare, Killorglin, and Castleisland are smaller towns. The county consists of 9 baronies and includes 85 civil parishes. Assizes are held in Tralee, and quarter sessions take place in Cahersiveen, Dingle, Kenmare, Killarney, Listowel, and Tralee. The constabulary force is based in Tralee. Before the Union, the county sent eight members to the Irish parliament: two for the county and two for each of the boroughs of Tralee, Dingle, and Ardfert. After the Union, the number was reduced to three: two for the county and one for the borough of Tralee; however, the divisions now consist of four: north, south, east, and west, each returning one member. The county is part of the Protestant diocese of Limerick and the Roman Catholic dioceses of Kerry and Limerick.
History.—The county is said to have derived its name from Ciar, who with his tribe, the Ciarraidhe, is stated to have inhabited about the beginning of the Christian era the territory lying between Tralee and the Shannon. That portion lying south of the Maine was at a later period included in the kingdom of Desmond (q.v.). Kerry suffered frequently from invasions of the Danes in the 9th and 10th centuries, until they were finally overthrown at the battle of Clontarf in 1014. In 1172 Dermot MacCarthy, king of Cork and Desmond, made submission to Henry II. on certain conditions, but was nevertheless gradually compelled to retire within the limits of Kerry, which is one of the areas generally considered to have been made shire ground by King John. An English adventurer, Raymond le Gros, received from this MacCarthy a large portion of the county round Lixnaw. In 1579-1580 attempts were made by the Spaniards to invade Ireland, landing at Limerick harbour, near Dingle, and a fortress was erected here, but was destroyed by the English in 1580. The Irish took advantage of the disturbed state of England at the time of the Puritan revolution to attempt the overthrow of the English rule in Kerry, and ultimately obtained possession of Tralee, but in 1652 the rebellion was completely subdued, and a large number of estates were afterwards confiscated.
History.—The county is thought to have gotten its name from Ciar, who and his tribe, the Ciarraidhe, are said to have lived around the start of the Christian era in the area between Tralee and the Shannon. The part south of the Maine was later included in the kingdom of Desmond (q.v.). Kerry faced frequent invasions from the Danes in the 9th and 10th centuries until they were finally defeated at the battle of Clontarf in 1014. In 1172, Dermot MacCarthy, the king of Cork and Desmond, submitted to Henry II. under certain conditions, but was gradually forced to retreat within the borders of Kerry, which is generally regarded as one of the areas turned into shire ground by King John. An English adventurer, Raymond le Gros, was granted a large part of the county around Lixnaw by MacCarthy. Between 1579 and 1580, the Spaniards attempted to invade Ireland, landing at Limerick harbour, near Dingle, and a fortress was built there, but was destroyed by the English in 1580. The Irish took advantage of the turmoil in England during the Puritan revolution to try to challenge English rule in Kerry, and ultimately captured Tralee, but by 1652 the rebellion was fully crushed, leading to the confiscation of many estates.
There are remains of a round tower at Aghadoe, near Killarney, and another, one of the finest and most perfect specimens in Ireland, 92 ft. high, at Rattoe, not far from Ballybunion. On 759 the summit of a hill to the north of Kenmare River is the remarkable stone fortress known as Staigue Fort. There are several stone cells in the principal Skellig island, where penance, involving the scaling of dangerous rocks, was done by pilgrims, and where there were formerly monastic remains which have been swept away by the sea. The principal groups of sepulchral stones are those on the summits of the Tomie Mountains, a remarkable stone fort at Cahersiveen, a circle of stones with cromlech in the parish of Tuosist, and others with inscriptions near Dingle. The remote peninsula west of a line from Dingle to Smerwick harbour is full of remains of various dates. The most notable monastic ruins are those of Innisfallen, founded by St Finian, a disciple of St Columba, and the fine remains of Muckross Abbey, founded by the Franciscans, but there are also monastic remains at Ardfert, Castlemaine, Derrynane, Kilcoleman and O’Dorney. Among ruined churches of interest are those of Aghadoe, Kilcrohane, Lough Currane, Derrynane and Muckross. The cathedral of Ardfert, founded probably in 1253, was partly destroyed during the Cromwellian wars, but was restored in 1831. Some interesting portions remain (see Tralee). There is a large number of feudal castles.
There are remains of a round tower at Aghadoe, near Killarney, and another one of the finest and most well-preserved examples in Ireland, standing 92 ft. high, at Rattoe, not far from Ballybunion. On the summit of a hill to the north of the Kenmare River is the impressive stone fortress known as Staigue Fort. There are several stone cells on the main Skellig island, where pilgrims performed penance that involved climbing dangerous rocks, and where remnants of a monastery were previously located but have been washed away by the sea. The main groups of burial stones are found on the summits of the Tomie Mountains, a notable stone fort at Cahersiveen, a circle of stones with a cromlech in the parish of Tuosist, and others with inscriptions near Dingle. The remote peninsula west of a line from Dingle to Smerwick Harbour is filled with remains from various periods. The most significant monastic ruins include those of Innisfallen, founded by St. Finian, a disciple of St. Columba, and the well-preserved remains of Muckross Abbey, founded by the Franciscans. Additionally, there are monastic remains at Ardfert, Castlemaine, Derrynane, Kilcoleman, and O’Dorney. Among the interesting ruined churches are those at Aghadoe, Kilcrohane, Lough Currane, Derrynane, and Muckross. The cathedral of Ardfert, likely founded in 1253, was partially destroyed during the Cromwellian wars but was restored in 1831. Some interesting portions of it still remain (see Tralee). There are a large number of feudal castles.

KERSAINT, ARMAND GUY SIMON DE COETNEMPREN, Comte de (1742-1793), French sailor and politician, was born at Paris on the 29th of July 1742. He came of an old family, his father, Guy François de Coetnempren, comte de Kersaint, being a distinguished naval officer. He entered the navy in 1755, and in 1757, while serving on his father’s ship, was promoted to the rank of ensign for his bravery in action. By 1782 he was a captain, and in this year took part in an expedition to Guiana. At that time the officers of the French navy were divided into two parties—the reds or nobles, and the blues or roturiers. At the outbreak of the Revolution, Kersaint, in spite of his high birth, took the side of the latter. He adopted the new ideas, and in a pamphlet entitled Le Bon Sens attacked feudal privileges; he also submitted to the Constituent Assembly a scheme for the reorganization of the navy, but it was not accepted. On the 4th of January 1791 Kersaint was appointed administrator of the department of the Seine by the electoral assembly of Paris. He was also elected as a député suppléant to the Legislative Assembly, and was called upon to sit in it in place of a deputy who had resigned. From this time onward his chief aim was the realization of the navy scheme which he had vainly submitted to the Constituent Assembly. He soon saw that this would be impossible unless there were a general reform of all institutions, and therefore gave his support to the policy of the advanced party in the Assembly, denouncing the conduct of Louis XVI., and on the 10th of August 1792 voting in favour of his deposition. Shortly after, he was sent on a mission to the armée du Centre, visiting in this way Soissons, Reims, Sedan and the Ardennes. While thus occupied he was arrested by the municipality of Sedan; he was set free after a few days’ detention. He took an active part in one of the last debates of the Legislative Assembly, in which it was decided to publish a Bulletin officiel, a report continued by the next Assembly, and known by the name of the Bulletin de la Convention Nationale. Kersaint was sent as a deputy to the Convention by the department of Seine-et-Oise in September 1792, and on the 1st of January 1793 was appointed vice-admiral. He continued to devote himself to questions concerning the navy and national defence, prepared a report on the English political system and the navy, and caused a decree to be passed for the formation of a committee of general defence, which after many modifications was to become the famous Committee of Public Safety. He had also had a decree passed concerning the navy on the 11th of January 1793. He had, however, entered the ranks of the Girondins, and had voted in the trial of the king against the death penalty and in favour of the appeal to the people. He resigned his seat in the Convention on the 20th of January. After the death of the king his opposition became more marked; he denounced the September massacres, but when called upon to justify his attitude confined himself to attacking Marat, who was at the time all-powerful. His friends tried in vain to obtain his appointment as minister of the marine; and he failed to obtain even a post as officer. He was arrested on the 23rd of September at Ville d’Avray, near Paris, and taken before the Revolutionary Tribunal, where he was accused of having conspired for the restoration of the monarchy, and of having insulted national representation by resigning his position in the legislature. He was executed on the 4th of December 1793.
KERSAINT, ARMAND GUY SIMON DE COETNEMPREN, Count of (1742-1793), French sailor and politician, was born in Paris on July 29, 1742. He came from an old family, with his father, Guy François de Coetnempren, comte de Kersaint, being a notable naval officer. He joined the navy in 1755, and in 1757, while serving on his father’s ship, he was promoted to ensign for his bravery in action. By 1782, he was a captain and participated in an expedition to Guiana that year. At that time, French navy officers were split into two groups—the reds or nobles, and the blues or roturiers. When the Revolution broke out, Kersaint, despite his noble background, sided with the latter. He embraced the new ideas and, in a pamphlet called Le Bon Sens, criticized feudal privileges; he also presented a plan for reorganizing the navy to the Constituent Assembly, but it was rejected. On January 4, 1791, Kersaint was appointed administrator of the Seine department by the Paris electoral assembly. He was also elected as a député suppléant to the Legislative Assembly and was called to serve in place of a deputy who had resigned. From this point on, his main goal was to achieve the navy plan he had unsuccessfully proposed to the Constituent Assembly. He quickly realized this wouldn’t happen without a complete reform of all institutions and thus supported the advanced party's policy in the Assembly, condemning King Louis XVI’s actions, and on August 10, 1792, he voted for his deposition. Shortly after, he was sent on a mission to the armée du Centre, visiting Soissons, Reims, Sedan, and the Ardennes along the way. While he was occupied, he was arrested by the municipality of Sedan but was freed after a few days. He actively participated in one of the last debates of the Legislative Assembly, where it was decided to publish a Bulletin officiel, a report continued by the next Assembly, known as the Bulletin de la Convention Nationale. Kersaint was sent as a deputy to the Convention by the Seine-et-Oise department in September 1792, and on January 1, 1793, he was appointed vice-admiral. He continued to focus on issues regarding the navy and national defense, drafting a report on the British political system and navy, and enabled a decree to be passed for creating a committee for general defense, which, after several changes, became the famous Committee of Public Safety. He also passed a decree regarding the navy on January 11, 1793. However, he had joined the Girondins and voted against the death penalty for the king and in support of an appeal to the people. He resigned from the Convention on January 20. After the king's execution, his opposition became more pronounced; he condemned the September massacres, but when asked to explain his stance, he only criticized Marat, who was then very powerful. His friends tried unsuccessfully to get him appointed as minister of the marine, and he couldn’t even secure a position as an officer. He was arrested on September 23 in Ville d’Avray, near Paris, and taken before the Revolutionary Tribunal, where he was accused of conspiring to restore the monarchy and insulting national representation by resigning his position in the legislature. He was executed on December 4, 1793.
His brother, Guy Pierre (1747-1822), also served in the navy, and took part in the American war of independence. He did not accept the principles of the Revolution, but emigrated. He was restored to his rank in the navy in 1803, and died in 1822, after having been préfet maritime of Antwerp, and prefect of the department of Meurthe.
His brother, Guy Pierre (1747-1822), also served in the navy and participated in the American War of Independence. He didn't agree with the principles of the Revolution, so he emigrated. He was reinstated to his naval rank in 1803 and passed away in 1822, having been the préfet maritime of Antwerp and prefect of the department of Meurthe.
See Kersaint’s own works, Le Bon Sens (1789); the Rubicon (1789); Considérations sur la force publique et l’institution des gardes nationales (1789); Lettre à Mirabeau (1791); Moyens présentés à l’Assemblée nationale pour rétablir la paix et l’ordre dans les colonies; also E. Chevalier, Histoire de la Marine française sous la première République; E. Charavay, L’Assemblée électorale de Paris en 1790 et 1791 (Paris, 1890); and Agénor Bardoux, La Duchesse de Duras (Paris, 1898), the beginning of which deals with Kersaint, whose daughter married Amédée de Duras.
See Kersaint’s own works, Le Bon Sens (1789); the Rubicon (1789); Considérations sur la force publique et l’institution des gardes nationales (1789); Lettre à Mirabeau (1791); Moyens présentés à l’Assemblée nationale pour rétablir la paix et l’ordre dans les colonies; also E. Chevalier, Histoire de la Marine française sous la première République; E. Charavay, L’Assemblée électorale de Paris en 1790 et 1791 (Paris, 1890); and Agénor Bardoux, La Duchesse de Duras (Paris, 1898), the beginning of which discusses Kersaint, whose daughter married Amédée de Duras.

KERVYN DE LETTENHOVE, CONSTANTINE BRUNO, Baron, (1817-1891), Belgian historian, was born at Saint-Michel-les-Bruges in 1817. He was a member of the Catholic Constitutional party and sat in the Chamber as member for Eecloo. In 1870 he was appointed a member of the cabinet of Anethan as minister of the interior. But his official career was short. The cabinet appointed as governor of Lille one Decker, who had been entangled in the financial speculations of Langand-Dumonceau by which the whole clerical party had been discredited, and which provoked riots. The cabinet was forced to resign, and Kervyn de Lettenhove devoted himself entirely to literature and history. He had already become known as the author of a book on Froissart (Brussels, 1855), which was crowned by the French Academy. He edited a series of chronicles—Chroniques relatives à l’histoire de la Belgique sous la domination des ducs de Bourgogne (Brussels, 1870-1873), and Rélations politiques des Pays Bas et de l’Angleterre sous le regne de Philippe II. (Brussels, 1882-1892). He wrote a history of Les Hugenots et les Gueux (Bruges, 1883-1885) in the spirit of a violent Roman Catholic partisan, but with much industry and learning. He died at Saint-Michel-les-Bruges in 1891.
KERVYN DE LETTENHOVE, CONSTANTINE BRUNO, Baron, (1817-1891), Belgian historian, was born in Saint-Michel-les-Bruges in 1817. He was a member of the Catholic Constitutional party and represented Eecloo in the Chamber. In 1870, he was appointed to the cabinet of Anethan as the minister of the interior. However, his official career was short-lived. The cabinet appointed a governor of Lille, Decker, who had been involved in the financial scandals of Langand-Dumonceau that discredited the entire clerical party and led to riots. The cabinet was forced to resign, and Kervyn de Lettenhove focused entirely on literature and history. He had already gained recognition for a book on Froissart (Brussels, 1855), which received an award from the French Academy. He edited a series of chronicles—Chroniques relatives à l’histoire de la Belgique sous la domination des ducs de Bourgogne (Brussels, 1870-1873), and Rélations politiques des Pays Bas et de l’Angleterre sous le règne de Philippe II. (Brussels, 1882-1892). He wrote a history of Les Huguenots et les Gueux (Bruges, 1883-1885) with a strong Roman Catholic bias, but with significant effort and scholarship. He passed away in Saint-Michel-les-Bruges in 1891.
See Notices biographiques et bibliographiques de l’académie de Belgique for 1887.
See Notices biographiques et bibliographiques de l’académie de Belgique for 1887.

KESHUB CHUNDER SEN (Keshava Chandra Sena) (1838-1884), Indian religious reformer, was born of a high-caste family at Calcutta in 1838. He was educated at one of the Calcutta colleges, where he became proficient in English literature and history. For a short time he was a clerk in the Bank of Bengal, but resigned his post to devote himself exclusively to literature and philosophy. At that time Sir William Hamilton, Hugh Blair, Victor Cousin, J. H. Newman and R. W. Emerson were among his favourite authors. Their works made the deepest impression on him, for, as he expressed it, “Philosophy first taught me insight and reflection, and turned my eyes inward from the things of the external world, so that I began to reflect on my position, character and destiny.” Like many other educated Hindus, Keshub Chunder Sen had gradually dissociated himself from the popular forms of the native religion, without abandoning what he believed to be its spirit. As early as 1857 he joined the Brahma Samaj, a religious association aiming at the reformation of Hinduism. Keshub Chunder Sen threw himself with enthusiasm into the work of this society and in 1862 himself undertook the ministry of one of its branches. In the same year he helped to found the Albert College and started the Indian Mirror, a weekly journal in which social and moral subjects were discussed. In 1863 he wrote The Brahma Samaj Vindicated. He also travelled about the country lecturing and preaching. The steady development of his reforming zeal led to a split in the society, which broke into two sections, Chunder Sen putting himself at the head of the reform movement, which took the name “Brahma Samaj of India,” and tried to propagate 760 its doctrines by missionary enterprise. Its tenets at this time were the following: (1) The wide universe is the temple of God. (2) Wisdom is the pure land of pilgrimage. (3) Truth is the everlasting scripture. (4) Faith is the root of all religions. (5) Love is the true spiritual culture. (6) The destruction of selfishness is the true asceticism. In 1866 he delivered an address on “Jesus Christ, Europe and Asia,” which led to the false impression that he was about to embrace Christianity. This helped to call attention to him in Europe, and in 1870 he paid a visit to England. The Hindu preacher was warmly welcomed by almost all denominations, particularly by the Unitarians, with whose creed the new Brahma Samaj had most in common, and it was the committee of the British and Foreign Unitarian Association that organized the welcome soirée at Hanover Square Rooms on the 12th of April. Ministers of ten different denominations were on the platform, and among those who officially bade him welcome were Lord Lawrence and Dean Stanley. He remained for six months in England, visiting most of the chief towns. His eloquence, delivery and command of the language won universal admiration. His own impression of England was somewhat disappointing. Christianity in England appeared to him too sectarian and narrow, too “muscular and hard,” and Christian life in England more materialistic and outward than spiritual and inward. “I came here an Indian, I go back a confirmed Indian; I came here a Theist, I go back a confirmed Theist. I have learnt to love my own country more and more.” These words spoken at the farewell soirée may furnish the key to the change in him which so greatly puzzled many of his English friends. He developed a tendency towards mysticism and a greater leaning to the spiritual teaching of the Indian philosophies, as well as a somewhat despotic attitude towards the Samaj. He gave his child daughter in marriage to the raja of Kuch Behar; he revived the performance of mystical plays, and himself took part in one. These changes alienated many followers, who deserted his standard and founded the Sadhārana (General) Brahma Samaj (1878). Chunder Sen did what he could to reinvigorate his own section by a new infusion of Christian ideas and phrases, e.g. “the New Dispensation,” “the Holy Spirit.” He also instituted a sacramental meal of rice and water. Two lectures delivered between 1881 and 1883 throw a good deal of light on his latest doctrines. They were “The Marvellous Mystery, the Trinity,” and “Asia’s Message to Europe.” This latter is an eloquent plea against the Europeanizing of Asia, as well as a protest against Western sectarianism. During the intervals of his last illness he wrote The New Samhita, or the Sacred Laws of the Aryans of the New Dispensation. He died in January 1884, leaving many bitter enemies and many warm friends.
Keshub Chunder Sen (Keshava Chandra Sena) (1838-1884), Indian religious reformer, was born into a high-caste family in Calcutta in 1838. He studied at a college in Calcutta, where he became skilled in English literature and history. For a short period, he worked as a clerk at the Bank of Bengal but left his position to dedicate himself entirely to literature and philosophy. During that time, Sir William Hamilton, Hugh Blair, Victor Cousin, J. H. Newman, and R. W. Emerson were among his favorite authors. Their works significantly influenced him; as he stated, “Philosophy first taught me insight and reflection and turned my focus inward from the external world, prompting me to contemplate my position, character, and destiny.” Like many other educated Hindus, Keshub Chunder Sen gradually distanced himself from the popular forms of native religion while retaining what he believed to be its essence. As early as 1857, he joined the Brahma Samaj, a religious organization aimed at reforming Hinduism. Keshub Chunder Sen enthusiastically threw himself into the society's work, and in 1862 he took on the ministry of one of its branches. In the same year, he helped establish Albert College and launched the Indian Mirror, a weekly journal that discussed social and moral issues. In 1863, he wrote The Brahma Samaj Vindicated. He also traveled across the country giving lectures and preaching. The steady growth of his reforming passion led to a split in the society, breaking it into two sections, with Chunder Sen leading the reform movement, which became known as the “Brahma Samaj of India,” and he sought to spread its doctrines through missionary efforts. At this time, its principles included: (1) The vast universe is God's temple. (2) Wisdom is the pure land of pilgrimage. (3) Truth is the eternal scripture. (4) Faith is the foundation of all religions. (5) Love is true spiritual growth. (6) The eradication of selfishness is the true asceticism. In 1866, he delivered a speech titled “Jesus Christ, Europe and Asia,” which led to a misunderstanding that he was about to convert to Christianity. This brought him to the attention of European audiences, and in 1870 he visited England. The Hindu preacher received a warm welcome from nearly all religious groups, especially the Unitarians, whose beliefs aligned closely with the new Brahma Samaj. The British and Foreign Unitarian Association's committee organized a welcome soirée at Hanover Square Rooms on April 12th, attended by ministers from ten different denominations, and notable figures such as Lord Lawrence and Dean Stanley officially welcomed him. He spent six months in England, visiting many major cities. His eloquence, delivery, and command of the language earned him widespread admiration. However, his impression of England was somewhat disappointing. He felt Christianity in England was too sectarian and narrow, too “muscular and hard,” and that Christian life there was more materialistic and external than spiritual and internal. “I came here an Indian; I go back a confirmed Indian. I came here a Theist; I go back a confirmed Theist. I have learned to love my own country more and more.” These words spoken at the farewell soirée may provide insight into the changes that puzzled many of his English friends. He developed a tendency towards mysticism and leaned more toward the spiritual teachings of Indian philosophies, as well as adopting a somewhat authoritarian attitude toward the Samaj. He arranged for his young daughter to marry the raja of Kuch Behar; he revived the performance of mystical plays and even participated in one himself. These changes alienated many followers, who abandoned him to establish the Sadhārana (General) Brahma Samaj (1878). Chunder Sen did what he could to revitalize his wing with new Christian ideas and phrases, such as “the New Dispensation” and “the Holy Spirit.” He also introduced a sacramental meal of rice and water. Two lectures he gave between 1881 and 1883 shed light on his latest doctrines: “The Marvellous Mystery, the Trinity,” and “Asia’s Message to Europe.” The latter is a passionate appeal against the Europeanizing of Asia and a protest against Western sectarianism. During his last illness, he wrote The New Samhita, or the Sacred Laws of the Aryans of the New Dispensation. He died in January 1884, leaving behind many bitter enemies and many warm friends.
See the article Brahma Samaj; also P. Mozoomdar, Life and Teachings of Keshub Chunder Sen (1888).
See the article Brahma Samaj; also P. Mozoomdar, Life and Teachings of Keshub Chunder Sen (1888).

KÉSMÁRK (Ger. Käsmark), a town of Hungary, in the county of Szepes, 240 m. N.E. of Budapest by rail. Pop. (1900), 5560. It is situated on the Poprad, at an altitude of 1950 ft., and is surrounded on all sides by mountains. Among its buildings are the Roman Catholic parish church, a Gothic edifice of the 15th century with fine carved altars; a wooden Protestant church of the 17th century; and an old town-hall. About 12 m. W. of Késmárk lies the famous watering-place Tatrafüred (Ger. Schmecks), at the foot of the Schlagendorfer peak in the Tatra Mountains. Késmárk is one of the oldest and most important Saxon settlements in the north of Hungary, and became a royal free town at the end of the 13th century, In 1440 it became the seat of the counts of Szepes (Ger., Zips), and in 1464 it was granted new privileges by King Matthias Corvinus. During the 16th century, together with the other Saxon towns in the Szepes county, it began to lose both its political and commercial importance. It remained a royal free town until 1876.
KÉSMÁRK (Ger. Käsmark) is a town in Hungary, located in Szepes County, 240 km northeast of Budapest by rail. Its population in 1900 was 5,560. The town is situated on the Poprad River at an elevation of 1,950 ft and is surrounded by mountains. Notable buildings include the Roman Catholic parish church, a Gothic structure from the 15th century featuring beautifully carved altars; a wooden Protestant church from the 17th century; and an old town hall. About 12 km west of Késmárk is the famous spa town of Tatrafüred (Ger. Schmecks), located at the base of the Schlagendorfer peak in the Tatra Mountains. Késmárk is one of the oldest and most significant Saxon settlements in northern Hungary and became a royal free town at the end of the 13th century. In 1440, it became the administrative center for the counts of Szepes (Ger., Zips), and in 1464, it was granted new privileges by King Matthias Corvinus. Throughout the 16th century, along with other Saxon towns in Szepes County, it began to lose its political and commercial significance. It remained a royal free town until 1876.

KESTREL (Fr. Cresserelle or Créçerelle, O. Fr. Quercerelle and Quercelle, in Burgundy Cristel), the English name1 for one of the smaller falcons. This bird, though in the form of its bill and length of its wings one of the true falcons, and by many ornithologists placed among them under its Linnaean name of Falco tinnunculus, is by others referred to a distinct genus Tinnunculus as T. alaudarius—the last being an epithet wholly inappropriate. We have here a case in which the propriety of the custom which requires the establishment of a genus on structural characters may seem open to question. The differences of structure which separate Tinnunculus from Falco are of the slightest, and, if insisted upon, must lead to including in the former birds which obviously differ from kestrels in all but a few characters arbitrarily chosen; and yet, if structural characters be set aside, the kestrels form an assemblage readily distinguishable by several peculiarities from all other Falconidae, and an assemblage separable from the true Falcons of the genus Falco, with its subsidiary groups Aesalon, Hypotriorchis, and the rest (see Falcon). Scarcely any one outside the walls of an ornithological museum or library would doubt for a moment whether any bird shown to him was a kestrel or not; and Gurney has stated his belief (Ibis, 1881, p. 277) that the aggregation of species placed by Bowdler Sharpe (Cat. Birds Brit. Mus. i. 423-448) under the generic designation of Cerchneis (which should properly be Tinnunculus) includes “three natural groups sufficiently distinct to be treated as at least separate subgenera, bearing the name of Dissodectes, Tinnunculus and Erythropus.” Of these the first and last are not kestrels, but are perhaps rather related to the hobbies (Hypotriorchis).
KESTREL (Fr. Cresserelle or Créçerelle, O. Fr. Quercerelle and Quercelle, in Burgundy Cristel), the English name for one of the smaller falcons. This bird, although it has the shape of its beak and the length of its wings typical of true falcons, is classified by many ornithologists under its Linnaean name of Falco tinnunculus, while others categorize it under a distinct genus Tinnunculus as T. alaudarius—the latter name is completely misleading. Here we have a situation where the validity of requiring a genus to be defined based on structural features may be questionable. The structural differences that separate Tinnunculus from Falco are very minimal and, if emphasized, would necessitate including in the former birds that clearly vary from kestrels in everything except a few arbitrarily chosen traits; yet, if we ignore these structural traits, kestrels can be easily identified by several unique characteristics that set them apart from all other Falconidae, and they can be separated from the true Falcons of the genus Falco, along with its related groups Aesalon, Hypotriorchis, and others (see Falcon). Almost no one outside an ornithological museum or library would doubt for a second whether a shown bird is a kestrel or not; Gurney has expressed his belief (Ibis, 1881, p. 277) that the grouping of species categorized by Bowdler Sharpe (Cat. Birds Brit. Mus. i. 423-448) under the generic name Cerchneis (which should correctly be Tinnunculus) includes “three natural groups that are distinct enough to be considered at least separate subgenera, which are named Dissodectes, Tinnunculus, and Erythropus.” Of these, the first and last are not kestrels, but are perhaps more closely related to hobbies (Hypotriorchis).
The ordinary kestrel of Europe, Falco tinnunculus or Tinnunculus alaudarius, is by far the commonest bird of prey in the British Islands. It is almost entirely a summer migrant, coming from the south in early spring and departing in autumn, though examples (which are nearly always found to be birds of the year) occasionally occur in winter, some arriving on the eastern coast in autumn. It is most often observed while hanging in the air for a minute or two in the same spot, by means of short and rapid beats of its wings, as, with head pointing to windward and expanded tail, it is looking out for prey—which consists chiefly of mice, but it will at times take a small bird, and the remains of frogs, insects and even earthworms have been found in its crop. It generally breeds in the deserted nest of a crow or pie, but frequently in rocks, ruins, or even in hollow trees—laying four or five eggs, mottled all over with dark brownish-red, sometimes tinged with orange and at other times with purple. Though it may occasionally snatch up a young partridge or pheasant, the kestrel is the most harmless bird of prey, if it be not, from its destruction of mice and cockchafers, a beneficial species. Its range extends over nearly the whole of Europe from 68° N. lat., and the greater part of Asia—though the form which inhabits Japan and is abundant in north-eastern China has been by some writers deemed distinct and called T. japonicus—it is also found over a great part of Africa, being, however, unknown beyond Guinea on the west and Mombasa on the east coast (Ibis, 1881, p. 457). The southern countries of Europe have also another and smaller species of kestrel, T. tinnunculoides (the T. cenchris and T. naumanni of some writers), which is widely spread in Africa and Asia, though specimens from India and China are distinguished as T. pekinensis.
The common kestrel of Europe, Falco tinnunculus or Tinnunculus alaudarius, is by far the most common bird of prey in the British Isles. It's mostly a summer migrant, arriving from the south in early spring and leaving in autumn, although individuals (which are usually young) sometimes appear in winter, with some arriving on the eastern coast in autumn. You often see it hovering in the air for a minute or two in the same spot, using quick, short wingbeats as it faces into the wind with its tail spread, searching for prey. Its main diet consists of mice, but it will occasionally catch a small bird, and remains of frogs, insects, and even earthworms have been found in its stomach. It typically nests in abandoned crow or magpie nests but often uses rocks, ruins, or even hollow trees, laying four or five eggs that are speckled all over with dark brownish-red, sometimes with orange or purple tints. While it might occasionally catch a young partridge or pheasant, the kestrel is usually quite harmless to other birds of prey and is beneficial due to its hunting of mice and cockchafers. Its range stretches across almost all of Europe from 68° N latitude and the majority of Asia—though the kestrels found in Japan and abundant in northeastern China have been classified by some as a distinct species, T. japonicus. It’s also present in large parts of Africa, but is not found beyond Guinea on the west and Mombasa on the east coast (Ibis, 1881, p. 457). Southern European countries have another, smaller species of kestrel, T. tinnunculoides (also referred to as T. cenchris and T. naumanni by some), which is widespread in Africa and Asia, while those from India and China are identified as T. pekinensis.
Three other species are found in Africa—T. rupicola, T. rupicoloides and T. alopex—the first a common bird in the Cape, while the others occur in the interior. Some of the islands of the Ethiopian region have peculiar species of kestrel, as the T. newtoni of Madagascar, T. punctatus of Mauritius and T. gracilis of the Seychelles; while, on the opposite side, the kestrel of the Cape Verde Islands has been separated as T. neglectus.
Three other species are found in Africa—T. rupicola, T. rupicoloides, and T. alopex—with the first being a common bird in the Cape, and the others found in the interior. Some of the islands in the Ethiopian region have unique species of kestrel, like T. newtoni from Madagascar, T. punctatus from Mauritius, and T. gracilis from the Seychelles; while, on the other side, the kestrel from the Cape Verde Islands has been classified as T. neglectus.
The T. sparverius, commonly known in Canada and the United States as the “sparrow-hawk,” is a beautiful little bird. Various attempts have been made to recognize several species, more or less in accordance with locality, but the majority of ornithologists seem unable to accept the distinctions which have been elaborated chiefly by Bowdler Sharpe in his Catalogue and R. Ridgway (North American Birds, iii. 150-175), the former of whom recognizes six species, while the latter admits but 761 three—T. sparverius, T. leucophrys and T. sparverioides—with five geographical races of the first, viz. the typical T. sparverius from the continent of North America except the coast of the Gulf of Mexico; T. australis from the continent of South America except the North Atlantic and Caribbean coasts; T. isabellinus, inhabiting continental America from Florida to Fr. Guiana; T. dominicensis from the Lesser Antilles as far northwards as St Thomas; and lastly T. cinnamominus from Chile and western Brazil. T. leucophrys is said to be from Haiti and Cuba; and T. sparverioides peculiar to Cuba only. This last has been generally allowed to be a good species, though Dr Gundlach, the best authority on the birds of that island, in his Contribucion á la Ornitologia Cubana (1876), will not allow its validity. More recently it was found (Ibis, 1881, pp. 547-564) that T. australis and T. cinnamominus cannot be separated, that Ridgway’s T. leucophrys should properly be called T. dominicensis, and his T. dominicensis T. antillarum; while Ridgway has recorded the supposed occurrence of T. sparverioides in Florida. Of other kestrels T. moluccensis is widely spread throughout the islands of the Malay Archipelago, while T. cenchroides seems to inhabit the whole of Australia, and has occurred in Tasmania (Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania, 1875, pp. 7, 8). No kestrel is found in New Zealand, but an approach to the form is made by the very peculiar Hieracidea (or Harpe) novae-zelandiae (of which a second race or species has been described, H. brunnea or H. ferox), the “sparrow-hawk,” “quail-hawk” and “bush-hawk” of the colonists—a bird of much higher courage than any kestrel, and perhaps exhibiting the more generalized and ancestral type from which both kestrels and falcons may have descended.
The T. sparverius, commonly known as the “sparrow-hawk” in Canada and the United States, is a lovely little bird. There have been various efforts to identify several species based on location, but most ornithologists seem to struggle with the classifications, which were mainly developed by Bowdler Sharpe in his Catalogue and R. Ridgway in North American Birds (iii. 150-175). Sharpe recognized six species, while Ridgway only acknowledges three—T. sparverius, T. leucophrys, and T. sparverioides—with five geographical variations of the first: the typical T. sparverius from North America excluding the Gulf of Mexico coast; T. australis from South America except for the North Atlantic and Caribbean coasts; T. isabellinus, which lives in continental America from Florida to French Guiana; T. dominicensis from the Lesser Antilles up to St. Thomas; and finally, T. cinnamominus from Chile and western Brazil. T. leucophrys is said to be from Haiti and Cuba, while T. sparverioides is unique to Cuba. The latter has generally been accepted as a valid species, though Dr. Gundlach, the foremost authority on the birds of that island, disputes its validity in his Contribucion á la Ornitologia Cubana (1876). More recently, it was found (Ibis, 1881, pp. 547-564) that T. australis and T. cinnamominus cannot be distinguished, Ridgway's T. leucophrys should actually be called T. dominicensis, and his T. dominicensis should be T. antillarum; Ridgway has also reported the supposed presence of T. sparverioides in Florida. Among other kestrels, T. moluccensis is widely found throughout the islands of the Malay Archipelago, while T. cenchroides appears to inhabit all of Australia and has been spotted in Tasmania (Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania, 1875, pp. 7, 8). No kestrel is found in New Zealand, but there is a similar form in the very unique Hieracidea (or Harpe) novae-zelandiae (of which a second race or species has been described, H. brunnea or H. ferox), known as the “sparrow-hawk,” “quail-hawk,” and “bush-hawk” by colonists—a bird that shows much more bravery than any kestrel and might represent a more generalized and ancestral type from which both kestrels and falcons could have evolved.

KESWICK, a market town in the Penrith parliamentary division of Cumberland, England, served by the joint line of the Cockermouth Keswick & Penrith, and London & North-Western railways. Pop. of urban district (1901), 4451. It lies in the northern part of the Lake District, in an open valley on the banks of the river Greta, with the mountain of Skiddaw to the north and the lovely lake of Derwentwater to the south. It is much frequented by visitors as a centre for this famous district—for boating on Derwentwater and for the easy ascent of Skiddaw. Many residences are seen in the neighbourhood, and the town as a whole is modern. Fitz Park, opened in 1887, is a pleasant recreation ground. The town-hall contains a museum of local geology, natural history, &c. In the parish church of Crosthwaite, ¾ m. distant, there is a monument to the poet Southey. His residence, Greta Hall, stands at the end of the main street, close by the river. Keswick is noted for its manufacture of lead pencils; and the plumbago (locally wad) used to be supplied from mines in Borrowdale. Char, caught in the neighbouring lakes, are potted at Keswick in large quantities and exported.
KESWICK, is a market town in the Penrith parliamentary division of Cumberland, England, served by the combined rail lines of the Cockermouth Keswick & Penrith, and London & North-Western railways. The population of the urban district in 1901 was 4,451. It is located in the northern part of the Lake District, in an open valley along the banks of the river Greta, with the mountain of Skiddaw to the north and the beautiful lake of Derwentwater to the south. The town is a popular destination for visitors exploring this famous area—for boating on Derwentwater and for the easy climb up Skiddaw. Numerous homes can be found in the area, and the town itself has a modern feel. Fitz Park, which opened in 1887, is a nice place for recreation. The town hall houses a museum showcasing local geology, natural history, etc. In the nearby parish church of Crosthwaite, ¾ mile away, there is a monument to the poet Southey. His home, Greta Hall, is located at the end of the main street, right by the river. Keswick is known for manufacturing lead pencils, with plumbago (locally known as wad) sourced from mines in Borrowdale. Char fish caught in the nearby lakes are processed and shipped in large quantities from Keswick.

KESWICK CONVENTION, an annual summer reunion held at the above town for the main purpose of “promoting practical holiness” by meetings for prayer, discussion and personal intercourse. It has no denominational limits, and is largely supported by the “Evangelical” section of the Church of England. The convention, started in a private manner by Canon Harford-Battersby, then vicar of Keswick, and Mr Robert Wilson in 1874, met first in 1875, and rapidly grew after the first few years, both in numbers and influence, in spite of attacks on the alleged “perfectionism” of some of its leaders and on the novelty of its methods. Its members take a deep interest in foreign missions.
KESWICK CONVENTION, is an annual summer gathering that takes place in the town of Keswick, aimed at “promoting practical holiness” through meetings for prayer, discussion, and personal connection. It is open to everyone, regardless of denomination, and is primarily supported by the “Evangelical” branch of the Church of England. The convention was originally established in a private setting by Canon Harford-Battersby, who was the vicar of Keswick, and Mr. Robert Wilson in 1874. It first convened in 1875 and quickly expanded in both size and influence over the following years, despite criticism regarding the supposed “perfectionism” of some of its leaders and the unconventionality of its practices. The members are deeply committed to foreign missions.
In the History of the C.M.S., vol. iii. (by Eugene Stock), the missionary influence of the “Keswick men” in Cambridge and elsewhere may be readily traced. See also The Keswick Convention: its Message, its Method and its Men, edited by C. F. Harford (1906).
In the History of the C.M.S., vol. iii. (by Eugene Stock), the missionary impact of the “Keswick men” in Cambridge and other places can be easily followed. See also The Keswick Convention: its Message, its Method and its Men, edited by C. F. Harford (1906).

KET (or Kett), ROBERT (d. 1549), English rebel, is usually called a tanner, but he certainly held the manor of Wymondham in Norfolk. With his brother William he led the men of Wymondham in their quarrel with a certain Flowerden, and having thus come into prominence, he headed the men of Norfolk when they rose in rebellion in 1549 owing to the hardships inflicted by the extensive enclosures of common lands and by the general policy of the protector Somerset. A feast held at Wymondham in July 1549 developed into a riot and gave the signal for the outbreak. Leading his followers to Norwich, Ket formed a camp on Mousehold Heath, where he is said to have commanded 16,000 men, introduced a regular system of discipline, administered justice and blockaded the city. He refused the royal offer of an amnesty on the ground that innocent and just men had no need of pardon, and on the 1st of August 1549 attacked and took possession of Norwich. John Dudley, earl of Warwick, marched against the rebels, and after his offer of pardon had been rejected he forced his way into the city, driving its defenders before him. Then, strengthened by the arrival of some foreign mercenaries, he attacked the main body of the rebels at Dussindale on the 27th of August. Ket’s men were easily routed by the trained soldiery, and Robert and William Ket were seized and taken to London, where they were condemned to death for treason. On the 7th of December 1549 Robert was executed at Norwich, and his body was hanged on the top of the castle, while that of William was hanged on the church tower at Wymondham.
KET (or Kett), ROBERT (d. 1549), an English rebel, is often labeled a tanner, but he definitely owned the manor of Wymondham in Norfolk. Along with his brother William, he led the men of Wymondham in a conflict with a man named Flowerden. After gaining attention from this dispute, he became the leader of the Norfolk rebels when they rose up in 1549 due to the struggles caused by the widespread enclosure of common lands and the overall policies of the protector Somerset. A feast held in Wymondham in July 1549 turned into a riot and sparked the rebellion. Taking his followers to Norwich, Kett set up a camp on Mousehold Heath, where he reportedly commanded 16,000 men, implemented a regular system of discipline, administered justice, and blockaded the city. He turned down a royal offer of amnesty, stating that innocent and just men didn’t need pardons, and on August 1, 1549, he attacked and took over Norwich. John Dudley, the Earl of Warwick, marched against the rebels and, after his offer of pardon was rejected, forced his way into the city, pushing the defenders back. Strengthened by the arrival of some foreign mercenaries, he confronted the main group of rebels at Dussindale on August 27. Kett’s forces were easily defeated by the trained soldiers, and Robert and William Kett were captured and taken to London, where they were sentenced to death for treason. On December 7, 1549, Robert was executed in Norwich, and his body was hanged at the top of the castle, while William's body was hanged on the church tower at Wymondham.
See F. W. Russell, Kett’s Rebellion (1859), and J. A. Froude, History of England, vol. iv. (London, 1898).
See F. W. Russell, Kett’s Rebellion (1859), and J. A. Froude, History of England, vol. iv. (London, 1898).

KETCH, JOHN (d. 1686), English executioner, who as “Jack Ketch” gave the nickname for nearly two centuries to his successors, is believed to have been appointed public hangman in the year 1663. The first recorded mention of him is in The Plotters Ballad, being Jack Ketch’s incomparable Receipt for the Cure of Traytorous Recusants and Wholesome Physick for a Popish Contagion, a broadside published in December 1672. The execution of William, Lord Russell, on the 21st of July 1683 was carried out by him in a clumsy way, and a pamphlet is extant which contains his “Apologie,” in which he alleges that the prisoner did not “dispose himself as was most suitable” and that he was interrupted while taking aim. On the scaffold, on the 15th of July 1685, the duke of Monmouth, addressing Ketch, referred to his treatment of Lord Russell, the result being that Ketch was quite unmanned and had to deal at least five strokes with his axe, and finally use a knife, to sever Monmouth’s head from his shoulders. In 1686 Ketch was deposed and imprisoned at Bridewell, but when his successor, Pascha Rose, a butcher, was, after four months in the office, hanged at Tyburn, Ketch was reappointed. He died towards the close of 1686.
KETCH, JOHN (d. 1686), English executioner, who became known as “Jack Ketch,” a name that would be used for nearly two centuries for those who followed in his role, is believed to have been appointed public hangman in 1663. The first recorded mention of him appears in The Plotters Ballad, being Jack Ketch’s incomparable Receipt for the Cure of Traytorous Recusants and Wholesome Physick for a Popish Contagion, a broadside published in December 1672. He executed William, Lord Russell, on July 21, 1683, but it was done in a clumsy manner, leading to the publication of a pamphlet containing his “Apologie,” where he claimed the prisoner did not “dispose himself as was most suitable” and that he was interrupted while trying to aim. On the scaffold, on July 15, 1685, the Duke of Monmouth addressed Ketch, mentioning his treatment of Lord Russell, causing Ketch to lose his composure and he had to swing his axe at least five times and ultimately use a knife to sever Monmouth’s head. In 1686, Ketch was removed from his position and imprisoned at Bridewell, but after his successor, Pascha Rose, a butcher, was hanged at Tyburn four months into the job, Ketch was reinstated. He died toward the end of 1686.

KETCHUP, also written catsup and katchup (said to be from the Chinese kôe-chiap or kê-tsiap, brine of pickled fish), a sauce or relish prepared principally from the juice of mushrooms and of many other species of edible fungi, salted for preservation and variously spiced. The juices of various fruits, such as cucumbers, tomatoes, and especially green walnuts, are used as a basis of ketchup, and shell-fish ketchup, from oysters, mussels and cockles, is also made; but in general the term is restricted to sauces having the juice of edible fungi as their basis.
Ketchup, also spelled catsup and katchup (thought to come from the Chinese kôe-chiap or kê-tsiap, which means brine of pickled fish), is a sauce or condiment mainly made from the juice of mushrooms and various other types of edible fungi, salted for preservation and flavored with different spices. Juices from various fruits, like cucumbers, tomatoes, and especially green walnuts, can also serve as the base for ketchup. Shellfish ketchup made from oysters, mussels, and cockles is also created; however, the term generally refers to sauces that primarily use the juice of edible fungi.

KETENES, in chemistry, a group of organic compounds which may be considered as internal anhydrides of acetic acid and its substitution derivatives. Two classes may be distinguished: the aldo-ketenes, including ketene itself, together with its mono-alkyl derivatives and carbon suboxide, and the keto-ketenes which comprise the dialkyl ketenes. The aldo-ketenes are colourless compounds which are not capable of autoxidation, are polymerized by pyridine or quinoline, and are inert towards compounds containing the groupings C:N and C:O. The keto-ketenes are coloured compounds, which undergo autoxidation readily, form ketene bases on the addition of pyridine and quinoline, and yield addition compounds with substances containing the C:N and C:O groupings. The ketenes are usually obtained by the action of zinc on ethereal or ethyl acetate solutions of halogen substituted acid chlorides or bromides. They are characterized by their additive reactions: combining with water to form acids, with alcohols to form esters, and with primary amines to form amides.
KETENES, in chemistry, are a group of organic compounds that can be seen as internal anhydrides of acetic acid and its substituted derivatives. There are two main types: aldo-ketenes, which include ketene itself, along with its mono-alkyl derivatives and carbon suboxide, and keto-ketenes, which consist of dialkyl ketenes. Aldo-ketenes are colorless compounds that do not undergo autoxidation, are polymerized by pyridine or quinoline, and are inert to compounds containing C:N and C:O groupings. Keto-ketenes are colored compounds that easily undergo autoxidation, form ketene bases when mixed with pyridine and quinoline, and create addition compounds with substances that have C:N and C:O groupings. Ketenes are typically produced by reacting zinc with ethereal or ethyl acetate solutions of halogen-substituted acid chlorides or bromides. They are characterized by their ability to react additively: combining with water to form acids, with alcohols to form esters, and with primary amines to form amides.
Ketene, CH2:CO, was discovered by N. T. M. Wilsmore (Jour. Chem. Soc., 1907, vol. 91, p. 1938) among the gaseous products formed 762 when a platinum wire is electrically heated under the surface of acetic anhydride. It is also obtained by the action of zinc on bromacetyl bromide (H. Staudinger, Ber. 1908, 41, p. 594). At ordinary temperatures it is a gas, but it may be condensed to a liquid and finally solidified, the solid melting at −151° C. It is characterized by its penetrating smell. On standing for some time a brown-coloured liquid is obtained, from which a colourless liquid boiling at 126-127° C., has been isolated (Wilsmore, ibid., 1908, 93, p. 946). Although originally described as acetylketen, it has proved to be a cyclic compound (Ber., 1909, 42, p. 4908). It is soluble in water, the solution showing an acid reaction, owing to the formation of aceto-acetic acid, and with alkalis it yields acetates. It differs from the simple ketenes in that it is apparently unacted upon by phenols and alcohols. Dimethyl ketene, (CH3)2C:CO1 obtained by the action of zinc on α-brom-isobutyryl bromide, is a yellowish coloured liquid. At ordinary temperatures it rapidly polymerizes (probably to a tetramethylcylobutanedione). It boils at 34° C (750 mm.) (Staudinger, Ber. 1905, 38, p. 1735; 1908, 41, p. 2208). Oxygen rapidly converts it into a white explosive solid. Diethyl ketene, (C2H5)2C:CO, is formed on heating diethylmalonic anhydride (Staudinger, ibid.). Diphenyl ketene, (C6H5)2C:CO, obtained by the action of zinc on diphenyl-chloracetyl chloride, is an orange-red liquid which boils at 146° C. (12 mm.). It does not polymerize. Magnesium phenyl bromide gives triphenyl vinyl alcohol.
Ketene, CH2:CO, was discovered by N. T. M. Wilsmore (Jour. Chem. Soc., 1907, vol. 91, p. 1938) among the gases produced 762 when a platinum wire is heated electrically under acetic anhydride. It can also be made by reacting zinc with bromacetyl bromide (H. Staudinger, Ber. 1908, 41, p. 594). At room temperature, it's a gas, but it can be turned into a liquid and eventually solidified, with the solid melting at −151° C. It has a strong, penetrating smell. After sitting for a while, it forms a brown liquid, from which a colorless liquid that boils at 126-127° C has been separated (Wilsmore, ibid., 1908, 93, p. 946). Initially known as acetylketene, it has been found to be a cyclic compound (Ber., 1909, 42, p. 4908). It dissolves in water, creating an acidic solution due to the formation of aceto-acetic acid, and reacts with alkalis to produce acetates. Unlike simple ketenes, it seems unaffected by phenols and alcohols. Dimethyl ketene, (CH3)2C:CO1, is created by the reaction of zinc with α-brom-isobutyryl bromide and is a yellowish liquid. It quickly polymerizes at room temperature (likely forming tetramethylcylobutanedione). It boils at 34° C (750 mm.) (Staudinger, Ber. 1905, 38, p. 1735; 1908, 41, p. 2208). Oxygen swiftly transforms it into a white explosive solid. Diethyl ketene, (C2H5)2C:CO, is produced by heating diethylmalonic anhydride (Staudinger, ibid.). Diphenyl ketene, (C6H5)2C:CO, which forms from the reaction of zinc with diphenyl-chloracetyl chloride, is an orange-red liquid with a boiling point of 146° C (12 mm.). It does not undergo polymerization. Magnesium phenyl bromide yields triphenyl vinyl alcohol.

KETI, a seaport of British India, in Karachi district, Sind, situated on the Hajamro branch of the Indus. Pop. (1901), 2127. It is an important seat of trade, where seaborne goods are transferred to and from river boats.
KETI, is a port in British India, located in the Karachi district of Sind, on the Hajamro branch of the Indus River. Population (1901): 2127. It's a key trading hub where goods transported by sea are loaded onto and unloaded from riverboats.

KETONES, in chemistry, organic compounds of the type R·CO·R′, where R, R′ = alkyl or aryl groups. If the groups R and R′ are identical, the ketone is called a simple ketone, if unlike, a mixed ketone. They may be prepared by the oxidation of secondary alcohols; by the addition of the elements of water to hydrocarbons of the acetylene type RC CH; by oxidation of primary alcohols of the type RR′CH·CH2OH:RR′·CH·CH2OH → R·CO·R′ + H2O + H2CO2; by distillation of the calcium salts of the fatty acids, CnH2nO2; by heating the sodium salts of these acids CnH2nO2 with the corresponding acid anhydride to 190° C. (W. H. Perkin, Jour. Chem. Soc., 1886, 49, p. 322); by the action of anhydrous ferric chloride on acid chlorides (J. Hamonet, Bull. de la soc. chim., 1888, 50, p. 357),
KETONES, are organic compounds in chemistry with the structure R·CO·R′, where R and R′ represent alkyl or aryl groups. If R and R′ are the same, it's called a simple ketone; if they are different, it's a mixed ketone. They can be made by oxidizing secondary alcohols, adding water elements to hydrocarbons like acetylene RC≡CH, oxidizing primary alcohols such as RR′CH·CH2OH:RR′·CH·CH2OH → R·CO·R′ + H2O + H2CO2, distilling calcium salts of fatty acids, CnH2nO2, or heating the sodium salts of these acids, CnH2nO2, with the corresponding acid anhydride to 190° C. (W. H. Perkin, Jour. Chem. Soc., 1886, 49, p. 322); or by the reaction of anhydrous ferric chloride with acid chlorides (J. Hamonet, Bull. de la soc. chim., 1888, 50, p. 357),
2C2H5COCl | → C2H5·CO·CH(CH3)·COCl |
→ C2H5·CO·CH(CH3)·CO2H | |
→ C2H5·CO·CH2·CH3; |
and by the action of zinc alkyls on acid chlorides (M. Freund, Ann., 1861, 118, p. 1), 2CH3COCl + ZnC(H3)2 = ZnCl2 + 2CH3·CO·CH3. In the last reaction complex addition products are formed, and must be quickly decomposed by water, otherwise tertiary alcohols are produced (A. M. Butlerow, Jahresb., 1864, p. 496; Ann. 1867, 144, p. 1). They may also be prepared by the decomposition of ketone chlorides with water; by the oxidation of the tertiary hydroxyacids; by the hydrolysis of the ketonic acids or their esters with dilute alkalis or baryta water (see Aceto-acetic Ester); by the hydrolysis of alkyl derivatives of acetone dicarboxylic acid, HO2C·CH2·CO·CHR·CO2H; and by the action of the Grignard reagent on nitriles (E. Blaise, Comptes rendus, 1901, 132, p. 38),
and through the reaction of zinc alkyls with acid chlorides (M. Freund, Ann., 1861, 118, p. 1), 2CH3COCl + ZnC(H3)2 = ZnCl2 + 2CH3·CO·CH3. In this last reaction, complex addition products are formed and must be rapidly broken down by water; otherwise, tertiary alcohols are generated (A. M. Butlerow, Jahresb., 1864, p. 496; Ann. 1867, 144, p. 1). They can also be produced by breaking down ketone chlorides with water; by oxidizing the tertiary hydroxyacids; by hydrolyzing the ketonic acids or their esters with dilute alkalis or baryta water (see Aceto-acetic Ester); by hydrolyzing alkyl derivatives of acetone dicarboxylic acid, HO2C·CH2·CO·CHR·CO2H; and by reacting the Grignard reagent with nitriles (E. Blaise, Comptes rendus, 1901, 132, p. 38),
R·CN + R′MgI → RR′C:N·MgI → R·CO·R′ + NH3 + MgI·OH.
R·CN + R′MgI → RR′C:N·MgI → R·CO·R′ + NH3 + MgI·OH.
The ketones are of neutral reaction, the lower members of the series being colourless, volatile, pleasant-smelling liquids. They do not reduce silver solutions, and are not so readily oxidized as the aldehydes. On oxidation, the molecule is split at the carbonyl group and a mixture of acids is obtained. Sodium amalgam reduces them to secondary alcohols; phosphorus pentachloride replaces the carbonyl oxygen by chlorine, forming the ketone chlorides. Only those ketones which contain a methyl group are capable of forming crystalline addition compounds with the alkaline bisulphites (F. Grimm, Ann., 1871, 157, p. 262). They combine with hydrocyanic acid to form nitriles, which on hydrolysis furnish hydroxyacids,
The ketones are neutral, with the smaller members of the series being colorless, volatile, and pleasant-smelling liquids. They don’t reduce silver solutions and aren’t as easily oxidized as aldehydes. When oxidized, the molecule splits at the carbonyl group, resulting in a mix of acids. Sodium amalgam can reduce them to secondary alcohols; phosphorus pentachloride replaces the carbonyl oxygen with chlorine, creating ketone chlorides. Only the ketones that have a methyl group can form crystalline addition compounds with alkaline bisulfites (F. Grimm, Ann., 1871, 157, p. 262). They react with hydrocyanic acid to form nitriles, which upon hydrolysis yield hydroxy acids.
(CH2)2CO → (CH3)2C·OH·CN → (CH3)2·C·OH·CO2H;
(CH2)2CO → (CH3)2C·OH·CN → (CH3)2·C·OH·CO2H;
with phenylhydrazine they yield hydrazones; with hydrazine they yield in addition ketazines RR′·C:N·N:C·RR′ (T. Curtius), and with hydroxylamine ketoximes. The latter readily undergo the “Beckmann” transformation on treatment with acid chlorides, yielding substituted acid amides.
with phenylhydrazine they produce hydrazones; with hydrazine they additionally produce ketazines RR′·C:N·N:C·RR′ (T. Curtius), and with hydroxylamine they produce ketoximes. The latter easily undergo the “Beckmann” transformation when treated with acid chlorides, resulting in substituted acid amides.
RR′·C:NOH → RC(NR′)·OH → R·CO·NHR′
RR′·C:NOH → RC(NR′)·OH → R·CO·NHR′
(see Oximes, also A. Hantzsch, Ber., 1891, 24, p. 13). The ketones react with mercaptan to form mercaptols (E. Baumann, Ber., 1885, 18, p. 883), and with concentrated nitric acid they yield dinitroparaffins (G. Chancel, Bull. de la soc. chim., 1879, 31, p. 503). With nitrous acid (obtained from amyl nitrite and gaseous hydrochloric acid, the ketone being dissolved in acetic acid) they form isonitrosoketones, R·CO·CH:NOH (L. Claisen, Ber., 1887, 20, pp. 656, 2194). With ammonia they yield complex condensation products; acetone forming di- and tri-acetonamines (W. Heintz, Ann. 1875, 178, p. 305; 1877, 189, p. 214). They also condense with aldehydes, under the influence of alkalis or sodium ethylate (L. Claisen, Ann., 1883, 218, pp. 121, 129, 145; 1884, 223, p. 137; S. Kostanecki and G. Rossbach, Ber., 1896, 29, pp. 1488, 1495, 1893, &c.). On treatment with the Grignard reagent, in absolute ether solution, they yield addition products which are decomposed by water with production of tertiary alcohols (V. Grignard, Comptes rendus, 1900, 130, P. 1322 et seq.),
(see Oximes, also A. Hantzsch, Ber., 1891, 24, p. 13). The ketones react with mercaptan to create mercaptols (E. Baumann, Ber., 1885, 18, p. 883), and when treated with concentrated nitric acid, they produce dinitroparaffins (G. Chancel, Bull. de la soc. chim., 1879, 31, p. 503). When mixed with nitrous acid (obtained from amyl nitrite and gaseous hydrochloric acid, with the ketone dissolved in acetic acid), they form isonitrosoketones, R·CO·CH:NOH (L. Claisen, Ber., 1887, 20, pp. 656, 2194). Reacting with ammonia results in complex condensation products; acetone creates di- and tri-acetonamines (W. Heintz, Ann. 1875, 178, p. 305; 1877, 189, p. 214). They also condense with aldehydes in the presence of alkalis or sodium ethylate (L. Claisen, Ann., 1883, 218, pp. 121, 129, 145; 1884, 223, p. 137; S. Kostanecki and G. Rossbach, Ber., 1896, 29, pp. 1488, 1495, 1893, &c.). When treated with the Grignard reagent in an absolute ether solution, they yield addition products that are broken down by water, resulting in tertiary alcohols (V. Grignard, Comptes rendus, 1900, 130, p. 1322 et seq.),
RR′CO → RR′·C(OMgI)·R″ → RR′R″·C(OH) + MgI·OH.
RR′CO → RR′·C(OMgI)·R″ → RR′R″·C(OH) + MgI·OH.
Ketones do not polymerize in the same way as aldehydes, but under the influence of acids and bases yield condensation products; thus acetone gives mesityl oxide, phorone and mesitylene (see below).
Ketones don’t polymerize like aldehydes, but they do produce condensation products when influenced by acids and bases. For instance, acetone produces mesityl oxide, phorone, and mesitylene (see below).
For dimethyl ketone or acetone, see Acetone. Diethyl ketone, (C2H5)2·CO, is a pleasant-smelling liquid boiling at 102.7° C. With concentrated nitric acid it forms dinitroethane, and it is oxidized by chromic acid to acetic and propionic acids. Methylnonylketone, CH3·CO·C9H19, is the chief constituent of oil of rue, which also contains methylheptylketone, CH3·CO·C7H15, a liquid of boiling-point 85-90° C. (7 mm.), which yields normal caprylic acid on oxidation with hypobromites.
For dimethyl ketone or acetone, see Acetone. Diethyl ketone, (C2H5)2·CO, is a sweet-smelling liquid that boils at 102.7° C. It reacts with concentrated nitric acid to form dinitroethane, and it can be oxidized by chromic acid to produce acetic and propionic acids. Methylnonylketone, CH3·CO·C9H19, is the main component of oil of rue, which also has methylheptylketone, CH3·CO·C7H15, a liquid with a boiling point of 85-90° C. (7 mm.) that yields normal caprylic acid when oxidized with hypobromites.
Mesityl oxide, (CH3)2C:CH·CO·CH3, is an aromatic smelling liquid of boiling point 129.5-130° C. It is insoluble in water, but readily dissolves in alcohol. On heating with dilute sulphuric acid it yields acetone, but with the concentrated acid it gives mesitylene, C9H12. Potassium permanganate oxidizes it to acetic acid and hydroxyisobutyric acid (A. Pinner, Ber., 1882, 15, p. 591). It forms hydroxyhydrocollidine when heated with acetamide and anhydrous zinc chloride (F. Canzoneri and G. Spica, Gazz. chim. Ital., 1884, 14, p. 349). Phorone, (CH3)2C:CH·CO·CH:C(CH3)2, forms yellow crystals which melt at 28° C. and boil at 197.2° C. When heated with phosphorus pentoxide it yields acetone, water and some pseudo-cumene. Dilute nitric acid oxidizes it to acetic and oxalic acids, while potassium permanganate oxidizes it to acetone, carbon dioxide and oxalic acid.
Mesityl oxide, (CH3)2C:CH·CO·CH3, is a liquid with a sweet, aromatic smell and a boiling point of 129.5-130° C. It doesn’t dissolve in water but easily mixes with alcohol. When heated with dilute sulfuric acid, it produces acetone, while with concentrated acid, it creates mesitylene, C9H12. Potassium permanganate can oxidize it into acetic acid and hydroxyisobutyric acid (A. Pinner, Ber., 1882, 15, p. 591). It also forms hydroxyhydrocollidine when heated with acetamide and anhydrous zinc chloride (F. Canzoneri and G. Spica, Gazz. chim. Ital., 1884, 14, p. 349). Phorone, (CH3)2C:CH·CO·CH:C(CH3)2, forms yellow crystals that melt at 28° C. and boil at 197.2° C. When heated with phosphorus pentoxide, it produces acetone, water, and some pseudo-cumene. Dilute nitric acid oxidizes it into acetic and oxalic acids, while potassium permanganate oxidizes it into acetone, carbon dioxide, and oxalic acid.
Diketones.—The diketones contain two carbonyl groups, and are distinguished as α or 1.2 diketones, β or 1.3 diketones, γ or 1.4 diketones, &c., according as they contain the groupings -CO·CO-, -CO·CH2·CO-, -CO·CH2·CH2·CO-, &c.
Diketones.—Diketones have two carbonyl groups and are classified as α or 1,2 diketones, β or 1,3 diketones, γ or 1,4 diketones, etc., depending on whether they have the groupings -CO·CO-, -CO·CH2·CO-, -CO·CH2·CH2·CO-, etc.
The α-diketones may be prepared by boiling the product of the action of alkaline bisulphites on isonitrosoketones with 15% sulphuric acid (H. v. Pechmann, Ber., 1887, 20, p. 3112; 1889, 22, p. 2115), CH3·CO·C:(N·OH)·CH3 → CH3·CO·C:(NHSO3)·CH3 → CH3·CO·CO·CH3; or by the action of isoamyl nitrite on the isonitrosoketones (O. Manasse, Ber., 1888, 21, p. 2177), C2H5·CO·C = (NOH)·CH3 + 11C5HONO = C2H5·CO·CO·CH3 + C5H11OH + N2O. They condense with orthodiamines to form quinoxalines (O. Hinsberg, Ann., 1887, 237, p. 327), and with ammonia and aldehydes to form imidazoles. Diacetyl, CH3·CO·CO·CH3, is a yellowish green liquid, which boils at 87-88°C., and possesses a pungent smell. It combines with sodium bisulphite and with hydrocyanic acid. Dilute alkalis convert it into paraxyloquinone.
The α-diketones can be created by boiling the product of alkaline bisulphites reacting with isonitrosoketones in 15% sulfuric acid (H. v. Pechmann, Ber., 1887, 20, p. 3112; 1889, 22, p. 2115), CH3·CO·C:(N·OH)·CH3 → CH3·CO·C:(NHSO3)·CH3 → CH3·CO·CO·CH3; or by the reaction of isoamyl nitrite with the isonitrosoketones (O. Manasse, Ber., 1888, 21, p. 2177), C2H5·CO·C = (NOH)·CH3 + 11C5HONO = C2H5·CO·CO·CH3 + C5H11OH + N2O. They react with orthodiamines to produce quinoxalines (O. Hinsberg, Ann., 1887, 237, p. 327), and with ammonia and aldehydes to form imidazoles. Diacetyl, CH3·CO·CO·CH3, is a yellowish-green liquid that boils at 87-88°C and has a sharp odor. It reacts with sodium bisulphite and hydrocyanic acid. Dilute alkalis transform it into paraxyloquinone.
The β-diketones form characteristic copper salts, and in alcoholic solution they combine with semicarbazide to form products which on boiling with ammoniacal silver nitrate solution give pyrazoles (T. Posner, Ber., 1901, 34, p. 3975); with hydroxylamine they form isoxazoles, and with phenylhydrazine pyrazoles. Acetyl acetone, CH3·CO·CH2·CO·CH3, may be prepared by the action of aluminium chloride on acetyl chloride, or by condensing ethyl acetate with acetone in the presence of sodium (L. Claisen). It is a liquid of boiling point 136° C. It condenses readily with aniline to give αγ-dimethyl quinoline.
The β-diketones create distinctive copper salts, and in alcoholic solution, they react with semicarbazide to produce compounds that, when boiled with ammoniacal silver nitrate solution, yield pyrazoles (T. Posner, Ber., 1901, 34, p. 3975); they form isoxazoles with hydroxylamine and pyrazoles with phenylhydrazine. Acetyl acetone, CH3·CO·CH2·CO·CH3, can be made by reacting aluminum chloride with acetyl chloride or by condensing ethyl acetate with acetone in the presence of sodium (L. Claisen). It is a liquid that boils at 136° C. It easily condenses with aniline to produce αγ-dimethyl quinoline.
The γ-diketones are characterized by the readiness with which they yield furfurane, pyrrol and thiophene derivatives, the furfurane derivatives being formed by heating the ketones with a dehydrating agent, the thiophenes by heating with phosphorus pentasulphide, and the pyrrols by the action of alcoholic ammonia or amines. Acetonyl acetone, CH3·CO·CH2·CH2·CO·CH3, a liquid boiling at 194° C., may be obtained by condensing sodium aceto-acetate with mono-chloracetone (C. Paal, Ber., 1885, 18, p. 59),
The γ-diketones are known for how easily they produce furfurane, pyrrole, and thiophene derivatives. Furfurane derivatives are created by heating the ketones with a dehydrating agent, thiophenes are formed by heating with phosphorus pentasulfide, and pyrroles are generated through the action of alcoholic ammonia or amines. Acetonyl acetone, CH3·CO·CH2·CH2·CO·CH3, is a liquid that boils at 194° C. and can be obtained by condensing sodium aceto-acetate with mono-chloroacetone (C. Paal, Ber., 1885, 18, p. 59),
CH3COCH2Cl + Na·CH·COCH3(COOR) |
→ CH3CO·CH2·CH·COCH3(COOR) |
→ CH3CO·CH2·CH2·COCH3; |
or by the hydrolysis of diaceto-succinic ester, prepared by the action of iodine on sodium aceto-acetate (L. Knorr, Ber., 1889, 22, pp. 169, 2100).
or by the hydrolysis of diaceto-succinic ester, made by the action of iodine on sodium aceto-acetate (L. Knorr, Ber., 1889, 22, pp. 169, 2100).
1.5 diketones have been prepared by L. Claisen by condensing ethoxymethylene aceto-acetic esters and similar compounds with β-ketonic esters and with 1.3 diketones. The ethoxymethylene aceto-acetic esters are prepared by condensing aceto-acetic ester with ortho-formic ester in the presence of acetic anhydride (German patents 77354, 79087, 79863). The 1.5 diketones of this type, when heated with aqueous ammonia, form pyridine derivatives. Those in which the keto groups are in combination with phenyl residues give pyridine derivatives on treatment with hydroxylamine, thus benzamarone, C6H5CH[CH(C6H5)·CO·C6H5], gives pentaphenylpyridine, NC5(C6H5)5. On the general reactions of the 1.5 diketones, see E. Knoevenagel (Ann., 1894, 281, p. 25 et seq.) and H. Stobbe (Ber., 1902, 35, p. 1445).
1.5 diketones have been made by L. Claisen by combining ethoxymethylene acetoacetic esters and similar compounds with β-ketonic esters and 1.3 diketones. The ethoxymethylene acetoacetic esters are produced by mixing acetoacetic ester with ortho-formic ester in the presence of acetic anhydride (German patents 77354, 79087, 79863). When heated with aqueous ammonia, these 1.5 diketones form pyridine derivatives. Those where the keto groups are combined with phenyl groups yield pyridine derivatives when treated with hydroxylamine; for example, benzamarone, C6H5CH[CH(C6H5)·CO·C6H5], yields pentaphenylpyridine, NC5(C6H5)5. For more on the general reactions of the 1.5 diketones, see E. Knoevenagel (Ann., 1894, 281, p. 25 et seq.) and H. Stobbe (Ber., 1902, 35, p. 1445).
Many cyclic ketones are known, and in most respects they resemble the ordinary aliphatic ketones (see Polymethylenes; Terpenes).
Many cyclic ketones are known, and in most ways, they are similar to regular aliphatic ketones (see Polymethylenes; Terpenes).

KETTELER, WILHELM EMMANUEL, Baron von (1811-1877), German theologian and politician, was born at Harkotten, in Bavaria, on the 25th of December 1811. He studied theology at Göttingen, Berlin, Heidelberg and Munich, and was ordained priest in 1844. He resolved to consecrate his life to maintaining the cause of the freedom of the Church from the control of the State. This brought him into collision with the civil power, an attitude which he maintained throughout a stormy and eventful life. Ketteler was rather a man of action than a scholar, and he first distinguished himself as one of the deputies of the Frankfort National Assembly, a position to which he was elected in 1848, and in which he soon became noted for his decision, foresight, energy and eloquence. In 1850 he was made bishop of Mainz, by order of the Vatican, in preference to the celebrated Professor Leopold Schmidt, of Giessen, whose Liberal sentiments were not agreeable to the Papal party. When elected, Ketteler refused to allow the students of theology in his diocese to attend lectures at Giessen, and ultimately founded an opposition seminary in the diocese of Mainz itself. He also founded orders of School Brothers and School Sisters, to work in the various educational agencies he had called into existence, and he laboured to institute orphanages and rescue homes. In 1858 he threw down the gauntlet against the State in his pamphlet on the rights of the Catholic Church in Germany. In 1863 he adopted Lassalle’s Socialistic views, and published his Die Arbeitfrage und das Christenthum. When the question of papal infallibility arose, he opposed the promulgation of the dogma on the ground that such promulgation was inopportune. But he was not resolute in his opposition. The opponents of the dogma complained at the very outset that he was wavering, half converted by his hosts, the members of the German College at Rome, and further influenced by his own misgivings. He soon deserted his anti-Infallibilist colleagues, and submitted to the decrees in August 1870. He was the warmest opponent of the State in the Kulturkampf provoked by Prince Bismarck after the publication of the Vatican decrees, and was largely instrumental in compelling that statesman to retract the pledge he had rashly given, never to “go to Canossa.” To such an extent did Bishop von Ketteler carry his opposition, that in 1874 he forbade his clergy to take part in celebrating the anniversary of the battle of Sedan, and declared the Rhine to be a “Catholic river.” He died at Burghausen, Upper Bavaria, on the 13th of July 1877.
KETTELER, WILHELM EMMANUEL, Baron von (1811-1877), German theologian and politician, was born in Harkotten, Bavaria, on December 25, 1811. He studied theology at Göttingen, Berlin, Heidelberg, and Munich, and was ordained as a priest in 1844. He decided to dedicate his life to preserving the freedom of the Church from State control. This stance put him at odds with the civil authorities, a position he maintained throughout a tumultuous and eventful life. Ketteler was more of a man of action than a scholar, and he first gained recognition as a deputy of the Frankfort National Assembly, a role he was elected to in 1848, where he quickly became known for his decisiveness, foresight, energy, and eloquence. In 1850, he was appointed bishop of Mainz by the Vatican, chosen over the well-known Professor Leopold Schmidt from Giessen, whose Liberal views were not favored by the Papal party. Upon his election, Ketteler refused to let theology students in his diocese attend lectures at Giessen and ultimately established a rival seminary in Mainz. He also founded orders of School Brothers and School Sisters to support various educational initiatives he established, and he worked to create orphanages and rescue homes. In 1858, he challenged the State with his pamphlet on the rights of the Catholic Church in Germany. In 1863, he adopted Lassalle’s Socialistic ideas and published his Die Arbeitfrage und das Christenthum. When the issue of papal infallibility came up, he opposed the declaration of the dogma on the grounds that it was untimely. However, he was not steadfast in his resistance. The critics of the dogma noted right away that he was wavering, somewhat swayed by his colleagues at the German College in Rome, as well as his own doubts. He soon abandoned his anti-infallibility colleagues and submitted to the decrees in August 1870. He was the most vocal opponent of the State during the Kulturkampf initiated by Prince Bismarck after the release of the Vatican decrees, and he played a significant role in forcing that statesman to retract his hasty promise never to “go to Canossa.” Bishop von Ketteler opposed the State to such an extent that in 1874, he prohibited his clergy from participating in the celebration of the anniversary of the battle of Sedan and declared the Rhine a “Catholic river.” He died in Burghausen, Upper Bavaria, on July 13, 1877.

KETTERING, a market town in the eastern parliamentary division of Northamptonshire, England, 72 m. N.N.W. from London by the Midland railway. Pop. of urban district (1891), 19,454; (1901), 28,653. The church of SS Peter and Paul, mainly Perpendicular, has a lofty and ornate tower and spire. The chief manufactures are boots, shoes, brushes, stays, clothing and agricultural implements. There are iron-works in the immediate neighbourhood. The privilege of market was granted in 1227 by a charter of Henry III.
Kettering, is a market town in the eastern parliamentary division of Northamptonshire, England, located 72 miles north-northwest of London by the Midland railway. The population of the urban district was 19,454 in 1891 and 28,653 in 1901. The church of SS Peter and Paul, primarily in the Perpendicular style, features a tall and decorative tower and spire. The main industries include the manufacturing of boots, shoes, brushes, stays, clothing, and agricultural tools. There are ironworks in the nearby area. The right to hold a market was granted in 1227 by a charter from Henry III.

KETTLE, SIR RUPERT ALFRED (1817-1894), English county court judge, was born at Birmingham on the 9th of January 1817. His family had for some time been connected with the glass-staining business. In 1845 he was called to the bar, and in 1859 he was made judge of the Worcestershire county courts, becoming also a bencher of the Middle Temple (1882). He acted as arbitrator in several important strikes, and besides being the first president of the Midland iron trade wages board, he was largely responsible for the formation of similar boards in other staple trades. His name thus became identified with the organization of a system of arbitration between employers and employed, and in 1880 he was knighted for his services in this capacity. In 1851 he married; one of his sons subsequently became a London police magistrate. Kettle died on the 6th of October 1894 at Wolverhampton.
KETTLE, SIR RUPERT ALFRED (1817-1894), an English county court judge, was born in Birmingham on January 9, 1817. His family had been involved in the glass-staining business for some time. In 1845, he was called to the bar, and in 1859, he became the judge of the Worcestershire county courts, also becoming a bencher of the Middle Temple in 1882. He served as an arbitrator in several significant strikes, and in addition to being the first president of the Midland iron trade wages board, he played a key role in establishing similar boards in other major trades. His name became associated with creating a system of arbitration between employers and employees, and in 1880, he was knighted for his contributions in this area. He married in 1851; one of his sons later became a London police magistrate. Kettle passed away on October 6, 1894, in Wolverhampton.

KETTLEDRUM1 (Fr. timbales; Ger. Pauken; Ital. timpani; Sp. timbal), the only kind of drum (q.v.) having a definite musical pitch. The kettledrum consists of a hemispherical pan of copper, brass or silver, over which a piece of vellum is stretched tightly by means of screws working on an iron ring, which fits closely round the head of the drum. In the bottom of the pan is a small vent-hole, which prevents the head being rent by the concussion of air. The vellum head may thus be slackened or tightened at will to produce any one of the notes within its compass of half an octave. Each kettledrum gives but one note at a time, and as it takes some little time to alter all the screws, two or three kettledrums, sometimes more, each tuned to a different note, are used in an orchestra or band. For centuries kettledrums have been made and used in Europe in pairs, one large and one small; the relative proportions of the two instruments being well defined and invariable. Even when eight pairs of drums, all tuned to different notes, are used, as by Berlioz in his “Grand Requiem,” there are still but the two sizes of drums to produce all the notes. Various mechanisms have been tried with the object of facilitating the change of pitch, but the simple old-fashioned model is still the most frequently used in England. Two sticks, of which there are several kinds, are employed to play the kettledrum; the best of these are made of whalebone for elasticity, and have a small wooden knob at one end, covered with a thin piece of fine sponge. Others have the button covered with felt or india-rubber. The kettledrum is struck at about a quarter of the diameter from the ring.
Kettledrum1 (Fr. timbales; Ger. Pauken; Ital. timpani; Sp. timbal), the only type of drum (q.v.) that has a definite musical pitch. The kettledrum consists of a hemispherical pan made of copper, brass, or silver, with a piece of vellum tightly stretched over it using screws on an iron ring that fits snugly around the drumhead. There’s a small vent-hole at the bottom of the pan that prevents the head from being damaged by air pressure. The vellum head can be loosened or tightened as needed to produce any note within its range of half an octave. Each kettledrum only plays one note at a time, and since it takes a little time to adjust all the screws, two or three kettledrums, sometimes more, each tuned to a different note, are used in an orchestra or band. For centuries, kettledrums have been made and used in Europe in pairs, one large and one small, with well-defined and consistent proportions between the two instruments. Even when eight pairs of drums, all tuned to different notes, are utilized, like in Berlioz's “Grand Requiem,” there are still only two sizes of drums to cover all the notes. Various mechanisms have been explored to make changing the pitch easier, but the classic traditional model is still the most commonly used in England. Two types of sticks, of which there are several kinds, are used to play the kettledrum; the best ones are made of whalebone for flexibility and have a small wooden knob at one end, covered with a thin layer of fine sponge. Others have the knob covered with felt or rubber. The kettledrum is struck about a quarter of the way from the ring toward the center.
The compass of kettledrums collectively is not much more than
an octave, between ; the larger instruments,
which it is inadvisable to tune below F, take any one of the following
notes:—
The range of kettledrums together is just over an octave, between ; the bigger instruments, which shouldn't be tuned lower than F, can play any of the following notes:—

and the smaller are tuned to one of the notes completing the
chromatic and enharmonic scale from . These
limits comprise all the notes of artistic value that can be obtained
from kettledrums. When there are but two drums—the term
“drum” used by musicians always denotes the kettledrum—they
are generally tuned to the tonic and dominant or to the tonic and
subdominant, these notes entering into the composition of most of
the harmonies of the key. Formerly the kettledrums used to be
treated as transposing instruments, the notation, as for the horn,
being in C, the key to which the kettledrums were to be tuned being
indicated in the score. Now composers write the real notes.
and the smaller ones are tuned to one of the notes that complete the chromatic and enharmonic scale from . These limits include all the notes of artistic value that can be produced from kettledrums. When there are only two drums—the term “drum” used by musicians typically refers to the kettledrum—they are usually tuned to the tonic and dominant or to the tonic and subdominant, as these notes are essential in most harmonies of the key. In the past, kettledrums were treated as transposing instruments, with notation similar to that of the horn in C, with the tuning key for the kettledrums indicated in the score. Now, composers write the actual notes.
The tone of a good kettledrum is sonorous, rich, and of great power. When noise rather than music is required uncovered sticks are used. The drums may be muffled or covered by placing a piece of cloth or silk over the vellum to damp the sound, a device which produces a lugubrious, mysterious effect and is indicated in the score by the words timpani coperti, timpani con sordini, timbales couvertes, gedämpfte Pauken. Besides the beautiful effects obtained by means of delicate gradations of tone, numerous rhythmical figures may be executed on one, two or more notes. German drummers who were 764 renowned during the 17th and 18th centuries, borrowing the terms from the trumpets with which the kettledrums were long associated, recognized the following beats:—
The sound of a good kettledrum is deep, rich, and powerful. When noise is needed instead of music, uncovered sticks are used. The drums can be muffled or covered by placing a piece of cloth or silk over the drumhead to soften the sound, creating a somber, mysterious effect, which is indicated in the score by the terms timpani coperti, timpani con sordini, timbales couvertes, and gedämpfte Pauken. In addition to the beautiful effects created by subtle changes in tone, various rhythmic patterns can be played on one, two, or more notes. German drummers, who were famous during the 17th and 18th centuries, borrowed terms from the trumpets that were often associated with kettledrums and recognized the following beats:—
Single tonguing
(Einfache Zungen)
Single tonguing

Double tonguing
(Doppel oder gerissene Zungen)
Double tonguing
(Doppel or split tongues)

Legato tonguing
(Tragende Zungen)
Legato tonguing
(Tragende Zungen)

Whole double-tonguing
(Ganze Doppel-Zungen)
Whole double-tonguing

Double cross-beat2
(Doppel Kreuzschläge)
Double cross-beat __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
(Doppel Kreuzschläge)

The roll
(Wirbel)
The roll

The double roll
(Doppel Wirbel)
The double roll
(Doppel Wirbel)

It is generally stated that Beethoven was the first to treat the kettledrum as a solo instrument, but in Dido, an opera by C. Graupner performed at the Hamburg Opera House in 1707, there is a short solo for the kettledrum.3
It is commonly said that Beethoven was the first to use the kettledrum as a solo instrument, but in Dido, an opera by C. Graupner performed at the Hamburg Opera House in 1707, there is a brief solo for the kettledrum.3
The tuning of the kettledrum is an operation requiring time, even when the screw-heads, as is now usual, are T-shaped; to expedite the change, therefore, efforts have been made in all countries to invent some mechanism which would enable the performer to tune the drum to a fixed note by a single movement. The first mechanical kettledrums date from the beginning of the 19th century. In Holland a system was invented by J. C. N. Stumpff4; in France by Labbaye in 1827; in Germany Einbigler patented a system in Frankfort-on-Main in 18365; in England Cornelius Ward in 1837; in Italy C. A. Boracchi of Monza in 1839.6
Tuning the kettledrum takes time, even with the now-common T-shaped screw heads. To speed up the process, efforts have been made worldwide to create mechanisms that allow the player to tune the drum to a specific note with a single motion. The first mechanical kettledrums appeared in the early 19th century. In Holland, J. C. N. Stumpff invented a system; in France, Labbaye developed one in 1827; in Germany, Einbigler patented a system in Frankfort-on-Main in 1836; in England, Cornelius Ward created a system in 1837; and in Italy, C. A. Boracchi of Monza designed one in 1839.
The drawback in most of these systems is the complicated nature of the mechanism, which soon gets out of order, and, being very cumbersome and heavy, it renders the instrument more or less of a fixture. Potter’s kettledrum with instantaneous system of tuning, the best known at the present day in England, and used in some military bands with entire success, is a complete contrast to the above. There is practically no mechanism; the system is simple, ingenious, and neither adds to the weight nor to the bulk of the instrument. There are no screws round the head of Potter’s kettledrum; an invisible system of cords in the interior, regulated by screws and rods in the form of a Maltese cross, is worked from the outside by a small handle connected to a dial, on the face of which are twenty-eight numbered notches. By means of these the performer is able to tune the drum instantly to any note within the compass by remembering the numbers which correspond to each note and pointing the indicator to it on the face of the dial. Should the cords become slightly stretched, flattening the pitch, causing the representative numbers to change, the performer need only give his indicator an extra turn to bring his instrument back to pitch, each note having several notches at its service. The internal mechanism, being of an elastic nature, has no detrimental effect on the tone but tends to increase its volume and improve its quality.
The main issue with most of these systems is their complex design, which often breaks down, and since they are quite bulky and heavy, they tend to feel like permanent fixtures. Potter's kettledrum, known for its instant tuning system and widely used in some military bands in England with great success, stands in stark contrast to the above. It has virtually no mechanism; the design is straightforward, clever, and doesn’t add weight or bulk to the instrument. There are no screws around the head of Potter’s kettledrum; instead, it features an invisible system of cords inside, adjusted by screws and rods shaped like a Maltese cross, which are operated externally with a small handle connected to a dial that has twenty-eight numbered notches. With these notches, the performer can instantly tune the drum to any note within range by memorizing the numbers that match each note and pointing the indicator to the corresponding spot on the dial. If the cords stretch a little and lower the pitch, shifting the corresponding numbers, the performer just needs to turn the indicator slightly to bring the instrument back in tune, as each note has several notches available. The internal mechanism, being flexible, does not negatively impact the tone; it actually enhances the volume and quality.
The origin of the kettledrum is remote and must be sought in the East. Its distinctive characteristic is a hemispherical or convex vessel, closed by means of a single parchment or skin drawn tightly over the aperture, whereas other drums consist of a cylinder, having one end or both covered by the parchment, as in the side-drum and tambourine respectively. The Romans were acquainted with the kettledrum, including it among the tympana; the tympanum leve, like a sieve, was the tambourine used in the rites of Bacchus and Cybele.7 The comparatively heavy tympanum of bronze mentioned by Catullus was probably the small kettledrum which appears in pairs on monuments of the middle ages.8 Pliny9 states that half pearls having one side round and the other flat were called tympania. If the name tympania (Gr. τύμπανον, from τύπτειν, to strike) was given to pearls of a certain shape because they resembled the kettledrum, this argues that the instrument was well known among the Romans. It is doubtful, however, if it was adopted by them as a military instrument, since it is not mentioned by Vegetius,10 who defines very clearly the duties of the service instruments buccina, tuba, cornu and lituus.
The kettledrum has a distant origin that traces back to the East. Its main feature is a hemispherical or convex cup sealed with a single tightly stretched piece of parchment or skin, while other drums are shaped like a cylinder, with one or both ends covered by the skin, like the side-drum and tambourine. The Romans were familiar with the kettledrum, referring to it as one of the tympana; the tympanum leve, resembling a sieve, was the tambourine used in the rituals of Bacchus and Cybele.7 The heavier bronze tympanum mentioned by Catullus was likely the small kettledrum that appears in pairs on medieval monuments.8 Pliny9 notes that half pearls with one round side and one flat side were called tympania. If the name tympania (Gr. drum, from τύπτειν, to strike) was given to pearls of a specific shape because they resembled the kettledrum, it suggests the instrument was well known to the Romans. However, it’s unclear whether it was used as a military instrument, as it is not mentioned by Vegetius,10 who clearly outlines the roles of service instruments like the buccina, tuba, cornu, and lituus.
The Greeks also knew the kettledrum, but as a warlike instrument of barbarians. Plutarch11 mentions that the Parthians, in order to frighten their enemies, in offering battle used not the horn or tuba, but hollow vessels covered with a skin, on which they beat, making a terrifying noise with these tympana. Whether the kettledrum penetrated into western Europe before the fall of the Roman Empire and continued to be included during the middle ages among the tympana has not been definitely ascertained. Isidore of Seville gives a somewhat vague description of tympanum, conveying the impression that his information has been obtained second-hand: “Tympanum est pellis vel corium ligno ex una parte extentum. Est enim pars media symphoniae in similitudinem cribri. Tympanum autem dictum quod medium est. Unde, et margaritum medium tympanum dicitur, et ipsum ut symphonia ad virgulam percutitur.”12 It is clear that in this passage Isidore is referring to Pliny.
The Greeks knew about the kettledrum, but they viewed it as a war instrument of barbarians. Plutarch mentions that the Parthians, to scare their enemies during battle, used not horns or trumpets, but hollow vessels covered with skin that they struck to create a terrifying noise with these drums. Whether the kettledrum made its way into Western Europe before the fall of the Roman Empire and continued to be part of the drums during the Middle Ages isn't definitively known. Isidore of Seville provides a somewhat vague description of the tympanum, suggesting that his information was passed down to him: “The tympanum is a skin or hide stretched over wood on one side. It is the central part of the symphony, resembling a sieve. It is called a tympanum because it is in the middle. Hence, the pearl is called the middle tympanum, and it is struck like a symphony with a stick.” It’s clear that in this passage, Isidore is referring to Pliny.
The names given during the middle ages to the kettledrum are derived from the East. We have attambal or attabal in Spain, 765 from the Persian tambal, whence is derived the modern French timbales; nacaire, naquaire or nakeres (English spelling), from the Arabic nakkarah or noqqārich (Bengali, nāgarā), and the German Pauke, M.H.G. Bûke or Pûke, which is probably derived from byk, the Assyrian name of the instrument.
The names for the kettledrum from the Middle Ages come from the East. In Spain, we have attambal or attabal, which comes from the Persian tambal, leading to the modern French timbales; nacaire, naquaire, or nakeres (English spelling), derived from the Arabic nakkarah or noqqārich (Bengali, nāgarā), and the German Pauke, M.H.G. Bûke or Pûke, likely originating from byk, the Assyrian name for the instrument.
![]() |
(Geo. Potter & Co. of Aldershot.) |
Fig. 1.—Mechanical Kettledrum, showing the system
of cords inside the head. This regiment is now the 21st (Empress of India) Lancers. |
A line in the chronicles of Joinville definitely establishes the identity of the nakeres as a kind of drum: “Lor il fist sonner les tabours que l’on appelle nacaires.” The nacaire is among the instruments mentioned by Froissart as having been used on the occasion of Edward III.’s triumphal entry into Calais in 1347: “trompes, tambours, nacaires, chalemies, muses.”13 Chaucer mentions them in the description of the tournament in the Knight’s Tale (line 2514):—
A line in the chronicles of Joinville clearly identifies the nakeres as a type of drum: “So he had the drums, which are called nacaires, sounded.” The nacaire is one of the instruments listed by Froissart that were used during Edward III’s triumphant entry into Calais in 1347: “trumpets, drums, nacaires, chalemies, muses.”13 Chaucer mentions them in the description of the tournament in the Knight’s Tale (line 2514):—
“Pipes, trompes, nakeres and clarionnes, "Pipes, trumpets, nakeres, and clarionettes," That in the bataille blowen blody sonnes.” That in the battle blown bloody suns. |
The earliest European illustration showing kettledrums is the scene depicting Pharaoh’s banquet in the fine illuminated MS. book of Genesis of the 5th or 6th century, preserved in Vienna. There are two pairs of shallow metal bowls on a table, on which a woman is performing with two sticks, as an accompaniment to the double pipes.14 As a companion illumination may be cited the picture of an Eastern banquet given in a 14th century MS. at the British Museum (Add. MS. 27,695), illuminated by a skilled Genoese. The potentate is enjoying the music of various instruments, among which are two kettledrums strapped to the back of a Nubian slave. This was the earlier manner of using the instrument before it became inseparably associated with the trumpet, sharing its position as the service instrument of the cavalry. Jost Amman15 gives a picture of a pair of kettledrums with banners being played by an armed knight on horseback.
The earliest European illustration of kettledrums is a scene showing Pharaoh’s banquet in the beautifully illuminated manuscript of the book of Genesis from the 5th or 6th century, which is preserved in Vienna. There are two pairs of shallow metal bowls on a table, and a woman is playing them with two sticks, accompanying the double pipes.14 Another related illustration is a depiction of an Eastern banquet found in a 14th-century manuscript at the British Museum (Add. MS. 27,695), created by a talented Genoese artist. The ruler is enjoying music from various instruments, including two kettledrums strapped to the back of a Nubian slave. This was the earlier way of using the instrument before it became closely linked with the trumpet, sharing its role as the main instrument in the cavalry. Jost Amman15 provides an illustration of a pair of kettledrums with banners being played by an armed knight on horseback.
![]() |
(From Härtel u. Wickhoff’s “Die Wiener Genesis,” Jahrbuch der kunslhistorischen Sammlungen des allerhöchsten Kaiserhauses.) |
Fig. 2.—Kettledrums in an early Christian MS. |
![]() |
Fig. 3.—Medieval Kettledrums, 14th century. (Brit. Museum.) |
As in the case of the trumpet, the use of the kettledrum was placed under great restrictions in Germany and France and to some extent in England, but it was used in churches with the trumpet.16 No French or German regiment was allowed kettledrums unless they had been captured from the enemy, and the timbalier or the Heerpauker on parade, in reviews and marches generally, rode at the head of the squadron; in battle his position was in the wings. In England, before the Restoration, only the Guards were allowed kettledrums, but after the accession of James II. every regiment of horse was provided with them.17 Before the Royal Regiment of Artillery was established, the master-general of ordnance was responsible for the raising of trains of artillery. Among his retinue in time of war were a trumpeter and kettledrummer. The kettledrums were mounted on a chariot drawn by six white horses. They appeared in the field for the first time in a train of artillery during the Irish rebellion of 1689, and the charges for ordnance 766 include the item, “large kettledrums mounted on a carriage with cloaths marked I.R. and cost £158, 9s.”18 A model of the kettledrums with their carriage which accompanied the duke of Marlborough to Holland in 1702 is preserved in the Rotunda Museum at Woolwich. The kettledrums accompanied the Royal Artillery train in the Vigo expedition and during the campaign in Flanders in 1748. Macbean19 states that they were mounted on a triumphal car ornamented and gilt, bearing the ordnance flag and drawn by six white horses. The position of the car on march was in front of the flag gun, and in camp in front of the quarters of the duke of Cumberland with the artillery guns packed round them. The kettledrummer had by order “to mount the kettledrum carriage every night half an hour before the sun sett and beat till gun fireing.” In 1759 the kettledrums ceased to form part of the establishment of the Royal Artillery, and they were deposited, together with their carriage, in the Tower, at the same time as a pair captured at Malplaquet in 1709. These Tower drums were frequently borrowed by Handel for performances of his oratorios.
Just like the trumpet, kettledrums were heavily regulated in Germany and France, and somewhat in England, but they were used in churches alongside the trumpet. No French or German regiment could have kettledrums unless they had been taken from the enemy, and the timbalier or the Heerpauker typically rode at the front of the squadron during parades, reviews, and marches; in battle, they were positioned on the flanks. In England, before the Restoration, only the Guards were permitted to use kettledrums, but after James II took the throne, every horse regiment was equipped with them. Before the Royal Regiment of Artillery was formed, the master-general of ordnance was in charge of organizing artillery trains. During wartime, his entourage included a trumpeter and a kettledrummer. The kettledrums were mounted on a chariot pulled by six white horses. They first appeared in the field as part of an artillery train during the Irish rebellion of 1689, with charges for ordnance including “large kettledrums mounted on a carriage with cloaths marked I.R. and cost £158, 9s.” A model of the kettledrums with their carriage that accompanied the Duke of Marlborough to Holland in 1702 is kept in the Rotunda Museum at Woolwich. The kettledrums were part of the Royal Artillery train during the Vigo expedition and the campaign in Flanders in 1748. Macbean states that they were on a triumphal car that was decorated and gilded, carrying the ordnance flag and drawn by six white horses. The car's position during a march was in front of the flag gun, and in camp, it was placed in front of the Duke of Cumberland's quarters with artillery guns packed around them. The kettledrummer was ordered to “mount the kettledrum carriage every night half an hour before sunset and beat until gun firing.” In 1759, kettledrums stopped being part of the Royal Artillery's establishment and were kept, along with their carriage, in the Tower, along with a pair captured at Malplaquet in 1709. These Tower drums were often borrowed by Handel for his oratorio performances.
The kettledrums still form part of the bands of the Life Guards and other cavalry regiments.
The kettledrums are still part of the bands of the Life Guards and other cavalry regiments.
1 From “drum” and “kettle,” a covered metal vessel for boiling water or other liquid; the O.E. word is cetel, cf. Du. ketel, Ger. Kessel, borrowed from Lat. catillus, dim. of catinus, bowl.
1 From “drum” and “kettle,” a covered metal container for boiling water or other liquids; the Old English word is cetel, comparable to Dutch ketel, German Kessel, borrowed from Latin catillus, a diminutive of catinus, bowl.
2 This rhythmical use of kettledrums was characteristic of the military instrument of percussion, rather than the musical member of the orchestra. During the middle ages and until the end of the 18th century, the two different notes obtainable from the pair of kettledrums were probably used more as a means of marking and varying the rhythm than as musical notes entering into the composition of the harmonies. The kettledrums, in fact, approximated to the side drums in technique. The contrast between the purely rhythmical use of kettledrums, given above, and the more modern musical use is well exemplified by the well-known solo for four kettledrums in Meyerbeer’s Robert le Diable, beginning thus—
2 The rhythmic use of kettledrums was typical of military percussion instruments, rather than the musical instruments found in an orchestra. During the Middle Ages and up until the end of the 18th century, the two different notes produced by the pair of kettledrums were likely used more for marking and varying the rhythm than for contributing musical notes to harmonies. In fact, kettledrums were similar to side drums in technique. The difference between the purely rhythmic use of kettledrums, as described above, and their more modern musical application is clearly shown in the famous solo for four kettledrums in Meyerbeer’s Robert le Diable, which starts like this—

3 See Wilhelm Kleefeld, Das Orchester der Hamburger Oper (1678-1738); Internationale Musikgesellschaft, Sammelband i. 2, p. 278 (Leipzig, 1899).
3 See Wilhelm Kleefeld, The Orchestra of the Hamburg Opera (1678-1738); International Music Society, Volume i. 2, p. 278 (Leipzig, 1899).
4 See J. Georges Kastner, Méthode complète et raisonnée de timbales (Paris), p. 19, where several of the early mechanical kettledrums are described and illustrated.
4 See J. Georges Kastner, Méthode complète et raisonnée de timbales (Paris), p. 19, which describes and illustrates several of the early mechanical kettledrums.
5 See Gustav Schilling’s Encyklopädie der gesammten musikal. Wissenschaften (Stuttgart, 1840), vol. v., art. “Pauke.”
5 See Gustav Schilling’s Encyclopedia of All Musical Sciences (Stuttgart, 1840), vol. v., art. “Timpani.”
6 See Manuale pel Timpanista (Milan, 1842), where Boracchi describes and illustrates his invention.
6 See Manuale pel Timpanista (Milan, 1842), where Boracchi describes and illustrates his invention.
7 Catullus, lxiii. 8-10; Claud. De cons. Stilich. iii. 365; Lucret. ii. 618; Virg. Aen. ix. 619, &c.
7 Catullus, lxiii. 8-10; Claud. De cons. Stilich. iii. 365; Lucret. ii. 618; Virg. Aen. ix. 619, &c.
8 John Carter, Specimens of Ancient Sculpture, bas-relief from seats of choir of Worcester cathedral and of collegiate church of St Katherine near the Tower of London (plates, vol. i. following p. 53 and vol. ii. following p. 22).
8 John Carter, Specimens of Ancient Sculpture, bas-relief from the choir seats of Worcester Cathedral and the collegiate church of St. Katherine near the Tower of London (plates, vol. i. following p. 53 and vol. ii. following p. 22).
9 Nat. Hist. ix. 35, 23.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Nat. Hist. 9.35, 23.
11 Crassus, xxiii. 10. See also Justin xli. 2, and Polydorus, lib. 1, cap. xv.
11 Crassus, xxiii. 10. See also Justin xli. 2, and Polydorus, lib. 1, cap. xv.
12 See Isidore of Seville, Etymologiarum, lib. iii. cap. 21, 141; Migne, Patr. curs. completus, lxxxii. 167.
12 See Isidore of Seville, Etymologiarum, book iii, chapter 21, 141; Migne, Patr. curs. completus, lxxxii. 167.
13 Panthéon littéraire (Paris, 1837), J. A. Buchon, vol. i. cap. 322, p. 273.
13 Literary Pantheon (Paris, 1837), J. A. Buchon, vol. i. ch. 322, p. 273.
14 Reproduced by Franz Wickhoff, “Die Wiener Genesis,” supplement to the 15th and 16th volumes of the Jahrb. d. kunsthistorischen Sammlungen d. allerhöchsten Kaiserhauses (Vienna, 1895); see frontispiece in colours and plate illustration XXXIV.
14 Reproduced by Franz Wickhoff, “Die Wiener Genesis,” supplement to the 15th and 16th volumes of the Jahrb. d. kunsthistorischen Sammlungen d. allerhöchsten Kaiserhauses (Vienna, 1895); see frontispiece in colors and plate illustration XXXIV.
15 Artliche u. kunstreiche Figuren zu der Reutterey (Frankfort-on-Main, 1584).
15 Artistic and Crafty Figures for the Cavalry (Frankfurt-on-Main, 1584).
16 See Michael Praetorius, Syntagma Musicum and Monatshefte f. Musikgeschichte, Jahrgang x. 51.
16 See Michael Praetorius, Syntagma Musicum and Monatshefte f. Musikgeschichte, Jahrgang x. 51.
17 See Georges Kastner, op. cit., pp. 10 and 11; Johann Ernst Altenburg, Versuch einer Anleitung z. heroisch-musikalischen Trompeter u. Paukerkunst (Halle, 1795), p. 128; and H. G. Farmer, Memoirs of the Royal Artillery Band p. 23, note 1 (London, 1904).
17 See Georges Kastner, op. cit., pp. 10 and 11; Johann Ernst Altenburg, Versuch einer Anleitung z. heroisch-musikalischen Trompeter u. Paukerkunst (Halle, 1795), p. 128; and H. G. Farmer, Memoirs of the Royal Artillery Band p. 23, note 1 (London, 1904).
18 Miller’s Artillery Regimental History; see also H. G. Farmer, op. cit., p. 22; illustration 1702, p. 26.
18 Miller’s Artillery Regimental History; see also H. G. Farmer, op. cit., p. 22; illustration 1702, p. 26.
19 Memoirs of the Royal Artillery.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Memoirs of the Royal Artillery.

KEUPER, in geology the third or uppermost subdivision of the Triassic system. The name is a local miners’ term of German origin; it corresponds to the French marnes irisées. The formation is well exposed in Swabia, Franconia, Alsace and Lorraine and Luxemburg; it extends from Basel on the east side of the Rhine into Hanover, and northwards it spreads into Sweden and through England into Scotland and north-east Ireland; it appears flanking the central plateau of France and in the Pyrenees and Sardinia. In the German region it is usual to divide the Keuper into three groups, the Rhaetic or upper Keuper, the middle, Hauptkeuper or gypskeuper, and the lower, Kohlenkeuper or Lettenkohle. In Germany the lower division consists mainly of grey clays and schieferletten with white, grey and brightly coloured sandstone and dolomitic limestone. The upper part of this division is often a grey dolomite known as the Grenz dolomite; the impure coal beds—Lettenkohle—are aggregated towards the base. The middle division is thicker than either of the others (at Göttingen, 450 metres); it consists of a marly series below, grey, red and green marls with gypsum and dolomite—this is the gypskeuper in its restricted sense. The higher part of the series is sandy, hence called the Steinmergel; it is comparatively free from gypsum. To this division belong the Myophoria beds (M. Raibliana) with galena in places; the Estheria beds (E. laxitesta); the Schelfsandstein, used as a building-stone; the Lehrberg and Berg-gyps beds; Semionotus beds (S. Bergeri) with building-stone of Coburg; and the Burgand Stubensandstein. The salt, which is associated with gypsum, is exploited in south Germany at Dreuze, Pettoncourt, Vie in Lorraine and Wimpfen on the Neckar. A ½-metre coal is found on this horizon in the Erzgebirge, and another, 2 metres thick, has been mined in Upper Silesia. The upper Keuper, Rhaetic or Avicula contorta zone in Germany is mainly sandy with dark grey shales and marls; it is seldom more than 25 metres thick. The sandstones are used for building purposes at Bayreuth, Culmbach and Bamberg. In Swabia and the Wesergebirge are several “bone-beds,” thicker than those in the middle Keuper, which contain a rich assemblage of fossil remains of fish, reptiles and the mammalian teeth of Microlestes antiquus and Triglyptus Fraasi. The name Rhaetic is derived from the Rhaetic Alps where the beds are well developed; they occur also in central France, the Pyrenees and England. In S. Tirol and the Judicarian Mountains the Rhaetic is represented by the Kössener beds. In the Alpine region the presence of coral beds gives rise to the so-called “Lithodendron Kalk.”
KEUPER, in geology is the third or topmost division of the Triassic system. The name is a local miners’ term of German origin; it corresponds to the French marnes irisées. The formation is well exposed in Swabia, Franconia, Alsace, Lorraine, and Luxembourg; it stretches from Basel on the east side of the Rhine into Hanover, and northwards it spreads into Sweden and through England into Scotland and northeast Ireland; it appears alongside the central plateau of France and in the Pyrenees and Sardinia. In Germany, it’s common to divide the Keuper into three groups: the Rhaetic or upper Keuper, the middle Hauptkeuper or gypskeuper, and the lower Kohlenkeuper or Lettenkohle. In Germany, the lower division mainly consists of grey clays and schieferletten with white, grey, and brightly colored sandstone and dolomitic limestone. The upper part of this division is often a grey dolomite known as the Grenz dolomite; the impure coal beds—Lettenkohle—are found towards the base. The middle division is thicker than either of the others (at Göttingen, 450 meters); it consists of a marly series below, grey, red, and green marls with gypsum and dolomite—this is the gypskeuper in its restricted sense. The higher part of the series is sandy, hence called the Steinmergel; it is relatively free from gypsum. This division includes the Myophoria beds (M. Raibliana) which contain galena in some areas; the Estheria beds (E. laxitesta); the Schelfsandstein, used as building stone; the Lehrberg and Berg-gyps beds; Semionotus beds (S. Bergeri) with building stone from Coburg; and the Burgand Stubensandstein. The salt that is associated with gypsum is mined in southern Germany at Dreuze, Pettoncourt, Vie in Lorraine, and Wimpfen on the Neckar. A ½-meter thick coal is found at this level in the Erzgebirge, and another, 2 meters thick, has been mined in Upper Silesia. The upper Keuper, Rhaetic or Avicula contorta zone in Germany is mainly sandy with dark grey shales and marls; it is usually no more than 25 meters thick. The sandstones are used for construction at Bayreuth, Culmbach, and Bamberg. In Swabia and the Wesergebirge, there are several “bone-beds,” thicker than those in the middle Keuper, which contain a rich mix of fossil remains of fish, reptiles, and the mammalian teeth of Microlestes antiquus and Triglyptus Fraasi. The name Rhaetic comes from the Rhaetic Alps where the beds are well developed; they are also found in central France, the Pyrenees, and England. In South Tyrol and the Judicarian Mountains, the Rhaetic is represented by the Kössener beds. In the Alpine region, the presence of coral beds leads to the so-called “Lithodendron Kalk.”
In Great Britain the Keuper contains the following sub-divisions: Rhaetic or Penarth beds, grey, red and green marls, black shales and so-called “white lias” (10-150 ft.). Upper Keuper marl, red and grey marls and shales with gypsum and rock salt (800-3000 ft.). Lower Keuper sandstone, marls and thin sandstones at the top, red and white sandstones (including the so-called “waterstones”) below, with breccias and conglomerates at the base (150-250 ft.). The basal or “dolomitic conglomerate” is a shore or scree breccia derived from local materials; it is well developed in the Mendip district. The rock-salt beds vary from 1 in. to 100 ft. in thickness; they are extensively worked (mined and pumped) in Cheshire, Middlesbrough and Antrim. The Keuper covers a large area in the midlands and around the flanks of the Pennine range; it reaches southward to the Devonshire coast, eastward into Yorkshire and north-westward into north Ireland and south Scotland. As in Germany, there are one or more “bone beds” in the English Rhaetic with a similar assemblage of fossils. In the “white lias” the upper hard limestone is known as the “sun bed” or “Jew stone”; at the base is the Cotham or landscape marble.
In Great Britain, the Keuper includes the following sections: Rhaetic or Penarth beds, consisting of grey, red, and green marls, black shales, and what's called “white lias” (10-150 ft.). Upper Keuper marl, which features red and grey marls and shales containing gypsum and rock salt (800-3000 ft.). Lower Keuper sandstone, with marls and thin sandstones on top, red and white sandstones (including the so-called “waterstones”) below, and breccias and conglomerates at the bottom (150-250 ft.). The basal or “dolomitic conglomerate” is a shore or scree breccia made from local materials; it is well-developed in the Mendip district. The rock-salt layers range from 1 inch to 100 ft. in thickness; they are extensively mined and pumped in Cheshire, Middlesbrough, and Antrim. The Keuper spans a large area in the midlands and around the edges of the Pennine range; it stretches southward to the Devonshire coast, eastward into Yorkshire, and north-westward into Northern Ireland and southern Scotland. Like in Germany, there’s one or more “bone beds” in the English Rhaetic with a similar collection of fossils. In the “white lias,” the upper hard limestone is referred to as the “sun bed” or “Jew stone”; at the bottom is the Cotham or landscape marble.
Representatives of the Rhaetic are found in south Sweden, where the lower portion contains workable coals, in the Himalayas, Japan, Tibet, Burma, eastern Siberia and in Spitzbergen. The upper portion of the Karroo beds of South Africa and part of the Otapiri series of New Zealand are probably of Rhaetic age.
Representatives of the Rhaetic can be found in southern Sweden, where the lower section has usable coal, in the Himalayas, Japan, Tibet, Burma, eastern Siberia, and Spitzbergen. The upper section of the Karroo beds in South Africa and parts of the Otapiri series in New Zealand are likely from the Rhaetic period.
The Keuper is not rich in fossils; the principal plants are cypress-like conifers (Walchia, Voltzia) and a few calamites with such forms as Equisetum arenaceum and Pterophyllum Jaegeri, Avicula contorta, Protocardium rhaeticum, Terebratula gregaria, Myophoria costata, M. Goldfassi and Lingula tenuessima, Anoplophoria lettica may be mentioned among the invertebrates. Fishes include Ceratodus, Hybodus and Lepidotus. Labyrinthodonts represented by the footprints of Cheirotherium and the bones of Labyrinthodon, Mastodonsaurus and Capitosaurus. Among the reptiles are Hyperodapedon, Palaeosaurus, Zanclodon, Nothosaurus and Belodon. Microlestes, the earliest known mammalian genus, has already been mentioned.
The Keuper isn't abundant in fossils; the main plants are cypress-like conifers (Walchia, Voltzia) and a few calamites, including forms like Equisetum arenaceum and Pterophyllum Jaegeri. Among the invertebrates, we can mention Avicula contorta, Protocardium rhaeticum, Terebratula gregaria, Myophoria costata, M. Goldfassi, and Lingula tenuessima, as well as Anoplophoria lettica. The fish include Ceratodus, Hybodus, and Lepidotus. Labyrinthodonts are represented by the footprints of Cheirotherium and the bones of Labyrinthodon, Mastodonsaurus, and Capitosaurus. Among the reptiles are Hyperodapedon, Palaeosaurus, Zanclodon, Nothosaurus, and Belodon. Microlestes, the earliest known mammalian genus, has already been mentioned.
See also the article Triassic System.
See the article Triassic System.

KEW, a township in the Kingston parliamentary division of Surrey, England, situated on the south bank of the Thames, 6 m. W.S.W. of Hyde Park Corner, London. Pop. (1901), 2699. A stone bridge of seven arches, erected in 1789, connecting Kew with Brentford on the other side of the river, was replaced by a bridge of three arches opened by Edward VII. in 1903 and named after him. Kew has increased greatly as a residential suburb of London; the old village consisted chiefly of a row of houses with gardens attached, situated on the north side of a green, to the south of which is the church and churchyard and at the west the principal entrance to Kew Gardens. From remains found in the bed of the river near Kew bridge it has been conjectured that the village marks the site of an old British settlement. The name first occurs in a document of the reign of Henry VII., where it is spelt Kayhough. The church of St Anne (1714) has a mausoleum containing the tomb of the duke of Cambridge (d. 1850) son of George III., and is also the burial-place of Thomas Gainsborough the artist, Jeremiah Meyer the painter of miniatures (d. 1789), John Zoffany the artist (d. 1810), Joshua Kirby the architect (d. 1774), and William Aiton the botanist and director of Kew Gardens (d. 1793).
KEW, is a neighborhood in the Kingston area of Surrey, England, located on the south bank of the Thames, 6 miles west-southwest of Hyde Park Corner, London. Population (1901): 2,699. A stone bridge with seven arches, built in 1789, connected Kew to Brentford on the opposite side of the river. This was replaced by a three-arched bridge opened by Edward VII in 1903, named in his honor. Kew has significantly expanded as a residential suburb of London; the old village mainly consisted of a line of houses with gardens on the north side of a green, with the church and churchyard to the south and the main entrance to Kew Gardens to the west. Archaeological findings in the riverbed near Kew Bridge suggest that the village could be the site of an ancient British settlement. The name first appears in a document from the reign of Henry VII, where it is spelled as Kayhough. The church of St Anne (1714) has a mausoleum that contains the tomb of the Duke of Cambridge (d. 1850), son of George III, and is also the burial site of the artist Thomas Gainsborough, miniaturist Jeremiah Meyer (d. 1789), artist John Zoffany (d. 1810), architect Joshua Kirby (d. 1774), and botanist William Aiton, who was the director of Kew Gardens (d. 1793).
The free school originally endowed by Lady Capel in 1721 received special benefactions from George IV., and the title of “the king’s free school.”
The free school originally established by Lady Capel in 1721 received special funding from George IV and was given the title of "the king's free school."
The estate of Kew House about the end of the 17th century came into the possession of Lord Capel of Tewkesbury, and in 1721 of Samuel Molyneux, secretary to the prince of Wales, afterwards George II. After his death it was leased by Frederick prince of Wales, son of George II., and was purchased about 1789 by George III., who devoted his leisure to its improvement. The old house was pulled down in 1802, and a new mansion was begun from the designs of James Wyatt, but the king’s death prevented its completion, and in 1827 the portion built was removed. Dutch House, close to Kew House, was sold by Robert Dudley, earl of Leicester, to Sir Hugh Portman, a Dutch merchant, late in the 16th century, and in 1781 was purchased by George III. as a nursery for the royal children. It is a plain brick structure, now known as Kew Palace.
The estate of Kew House at the end of the 17th century came into the hands of Lord Capel of Tewkesbury, and in 1721 it was owned by Samuel Molyneux, secretary to the Prince of Wales, who later became George II. After his death, it was leased by Frederick, Prince of Wales, the son of George II., and was bought around 1789 by George III., who spent his free time improving it. The old house was demolished in 1802, and a new mansion was started based on designs by James Wyatt, but the king's death stopped its completion, and in 1827 the part that was built was taken down. Dutch House, near Kew House, was sold by Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, to Sir Hugh Portman, a Dutch merchant, in the late 16th century, and in 1781 was bought by George III. as a nursery for the royal children. It is a simple brick building, now known as Kew Palace.
The Royal Botanic Gardens of Kew originated in the exotic garden formed by Lord Capel and greatly extended by the princess dowager, widow of Frederick, prince of Wales, and by George III., aided by the skill of William Aiton and of Sir Joseph Banks. In 1840 the gardens were adopted as a national establishment, and transferred to the department of woods and forests. The gardens proper, which originally contained only about 11 acres, were subsequently increased to 75 acres, and the pleasure grounds or arboretum adjoining extend to 270 acres. There are extensive conservatories, botanical museums, including the magnificent herbarium and a library. A lofty Chinese pagoda was erected in 1761. A flagstaff 159 ft. high is made out of the fine single trunk of a Douglas pine. In the neighbouring Richmond Old Park is the important Kew Observatory.
The Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew started as an exotic garden created by Lord Capel and greatly expanded by the princess dowager, the widow of Frederick, prince of Wales, and by George III., with the expertise of William Aiton and Sir Joseph Banks. In 1840, the gardens became a national establishment and were handed over to the department of woods and forests. The gardens, which initially covered just about 11 acres, were later expanded to 75 acres, and the adjacent pleasure grounds or arboretum cover 270 acres. There are large conservatories, botanical museums, including a stunning herbarium and a library. A tall Chinese pagoda was built in 1761. A 159 ft. tall flagpole is crafted from a single, fine trunk of a Douglas pine. Nearby, in Richmond Old Park, is the significant Kew Observatory.

KEWANEE, a city of Henry county, Illinois, U.S.A., in the N. W. part of the state, about 55 m. N. by W. of Peoria. Pop. (1900), 8382, of whom 2006 were foreign-born; (1910 census), 9307. It is served by the Chicago Burlington & Quincy railroad and by the Galesburg & Kewanee Electric railway. Among its manufactures are foundry and machine-shop products, boilers, carriages and wagons, agricultural implements, pipe and fittings, working-men’s gloves, &c. In 1905 the total factory product was valued at $6,729,381, or 61.5% more than in 1900. Kewanee was settled in 1836 by people from Wethersfield, Connecticut, and was first chartered as a city in 1897.
KEWANEE, is a city in Henry County, Illinois, U.S.A., located in the northwest part of the state, about 55 miles north by west of Peoria. The population was 8,382 in 1900, with 2,006 foreign-born residents; according to the 1910 census, it grew to 9,307. The city is served by the Chicago Burlington & Quincy Railroad and the Galesburg & Kewanee Electric Railway. Kewanee's manufacturing includes foundry and machine-shop products, boilers, carriages and wagons, agricultural tools, pipe and fittings, and working men's gloves, among others. In 1905, the total value of factory products was $6,729,381, an increase of 61.5% compared to 1900. Kewanee was settled in 1836 by people from Wethersfield, Connecticut, and received its city charter in 1897.

KEY, SIR ASTLEY COOPER (1821-1888), English admiral, was born in London in 1821, and entered the navy in 1833. His father was Charles Aston Key (1793-1849), a well-known surgeon, the pupil of Sir Astley Cooper, and his mother was the latter’s niece. After distinguishing himself in active service abroad, on the South American station (1844-1846), in the Baltic during the Crimean War (C.B. 1855) and China (1857), Key was appointed in 1858 a member of the royal commission on national defence, in 1860 captain of the steam reserve at Devonport, and in 1863 captain of H.M.S. “Excellent” and superintendent of the Royal Naval College. He had a considerable share in advising as to the reorganization of administration, and in 1866, having become rear-admiral, was made director of naval ordnance. Between 1869 and 1872 he held the offices of superintendent of Portsmouth dockyard, superintendent of Malta dockyard, and second in command in the Mediterranean. In 1872 he was made president of the projected Royal Naval College at Greenwich, which was organized by him, and after its opening in 1873 he was made a K.C.B, and a vice-admiral. In 1876 he was appointed commander-in-chief on the North American and West Indian station. Having become full admiral in 1878, he was appointed in 1879 principal A.D.C., and soon afterwards first naval lord of the admiralty, retaining this post till 1885. In 1882 he was made G.C.B. He died at Maidenhead on the 3rd of March, 1888.
KEY, SIR ASTLEY COOPER (1821-1888), English admiral, was born in London in 1821 and joined the navy in 1833. His father was Charles Aston Key (1793-1849), a well-known surgeon and student of Sir Astley Cooper, and his mother was the latter’s niece. After making a name for himself in active service abroad on the South American station (1844-1846), in the Baltic during the Crimean War (C.B. 1855), and in China (1857), Key was appointed a member of the royal commission on national defense in 1858, captain of the steam reserve at Devonport in 1860, and captain of H.M.S. “Excellent” as well as superintendent of the Royal Naval College in 1863. He played a significant role in advising on the reorganization of the administration, and in 1866, having become rear-admiral, was appointed director of naval ordnance. Between 1869 and 1872, he held the positions of superintendent of Portsmouth dockyard, superintendent of Malta dockyard, and second in command in the Mediterranean. In 1872, he became president of the planned Royal Naval College at Greenwich, which he organized, and after it opened in 1873, he was made a K.C.B. and a vice-admiral. In 1876, he was appointed commander-in-chief on the North American and West Indian station. After becoming a full admiral in 1878, he was appointed principal A.D.C. in 1879, and soon after became the first naval lord of the admiralty, a position he held until 1885. In 1882, he was made G.C.B. He died in Maidenhead on March 3, 1888.
See Memoirs of Sir Astley Cooper Key, by Vice-Admiral Colomb (1898).
See Memoirs of Sir Astley Cooper Key, by Vice-Admiral Colomb (1898).

KEY, THOMAS HEWITT (1799-1875), English classical scholar, was born in London on the 20th of March, 1799. He was educated at St John’s and Trinity Colleges, Cambridge, and graduated 19th wrangler in 1821. From 1825 to 1827 he was professor of mathematics in the university of Virginia, and after his return to England was appointed (1828) professor of Latin in the newly founded university of London. In 1832 he became joint headmaster of the school founded in connexion with that institution; in 1842 he resigned the professorship of Latin, and took up that of comparative grammar together with the undivided headmastership of the school. These two posts he held till his death on the 29th of November 1875. Key is best known for his introduction of the crude-form (the uninflected form or stem of words) system, in general use among Sanskrit grammarians, into the teaching of the classical languages. This system was embodied in his Latin Grammar (1846). In Language, its Origin and Development (1874), he upholds the onomatopoeic theory. Key was prejudiced against the German “Sanskritists,” and the etymological portion of his Latin Dictionary, published in 1888, was severely criticized on this account. He was a member of the Royal Society and president of the Philological Society, to the Transactions of which he contributed largely.
KEY, THOMAS HEWITT (1799-1875), English classical scholar, was born in London on March 20, 1799. He studied at St John’s and Trinity Colleges, Cambridge, and graduated 19th wrangler in 1821. From 1825 to 1827, he was a professor of mathematics at the University of Virginia, and after returning to England, he was appointed (1828) as a professor of Latin at the newly established University of London. In 1832, he became co-headmaster of the school associated with that institution; in 1842, he resigned from the Latin professorship and took on the role of head of comparative grammar along with being the sole headmaster of the school. He held these two positions until his death on November 29, 1875. Key is best known for introducing the crude-form (the uninflected form or stem of words) system, which is widely used among Sanskrit grammarians, into the teaching of classical languages. This system was included in his Latin Grammar (1846). In Language, its Origin and Development (1874), he supports the onomatopoeic theory. Key had a bias against German “Sanskritists,” and the etymological section of his Latin Dictionary, published in 1888, faced heavy criticism for this reason. He was a member of the Royal Society and served as president of the Philological Society, to which he contributed extensively in its Transactions.
See Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. xxiv. (1876); R. Ellis in the Academy (Dec. 4, 1875); J. P. Hicks, T. Hewitt Key (1893), where a full list of his works and contributions is given.
See Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. xxiv. (1876); R. Ellis in the Academy (Dec. 4, 1875); J. P. Hicks, T. Hewitt Key (1893), where a full list of his works and contributions is given.

KEY (in O. Eng. caég; the ultimate origin of the word is unknown; it appears only in Old Frisian kei of other Teutonic languages; until the end of the 17th century the pronunciation was kay, as in other words in O. Eng. ending in aég; cf. daég, day; claég, clay; the New English Dictionary takes the change to kee to be due to northern influence), an instrument of metal used for the opening and closing of a lock (see Lock). Until the 14th century bronze and not iron was most commonly used. The terminals of the stem of the keys were frequently decorated, the “bow” or loop taking the form sometimes of a trefoil, with figures inscribed within it; this decoration increased in the 16th century, the terminals being made in the shape of animals and other figures. Still more elaborate ceremonial keys were used by court officials; a series of chamberlains’ keys used during the 18th and 19th centuries in several courts in Europe is in the British Museum. The terminals are decorated with crowns, royal monograms and ciphers. The word “key” is by analogy applied to things regarded as means for the opening or closing of anything, for the making clear that which is hidden. Thus it is used of an interpretation as to the arrangement of the letters or words of a cipher, of a solution of mathematical or other problems, or of a translation of exercises or books, &c., from a foreign language. The term is also used figuratively of a place of commanding strategic position. Thus Gibraltar, the “Key of the Mediterranean,” was granted in 1462 by Henry IV. of Castile, the arms, gules, a castle proper, with key pendant to the gate, or; these arms form the badge of the 50th regiment of foot (now 2nd Batt. Essex Regiment) in the British army, in memory of the part which it took in the siege of 1782. The word is also frequently applied to many mechanical contrivances for unfastening or loosening a valve, nut, bolt, &c., such as a spanner or wrench, and to the instruments used in tuning a pianoforte or harp or in winding clocks or watches. A farther extension of the word is to appliances or devices which serve to lock or fasten together distinct parts of a structure, as the “key-stone” of an arch, the wedge or piece of wood, metal, &c., which fixes a joint, or a small metal instrument, shaped like a U, used to secure the bands in the process of sewing in bookbinding.
KEY (in Old English caég; the exact origin of the word is unknown; it appears only in Old Frisian kei and other Germanic languages; until the end of the 17th century, it was pronounced kay, like other Old English words ending in aég; cf. daég, day; claég, clay; the New English Dictionary suggests the shift to kee is due to northern influence), is a metal tool used to open and close a lock (see Lock). Until the 14th century, bronze was the most common material used, rather than iron. The ends of the key shafts were often decorated, with the “bow” or loop sometimes shaped like a trefoil, featuring figures etched inside; this decoration became more elaborate in the 16th century, with the ends shaped like animals and other designs. Even more ornate ceremonial keys were used by court officials; a collection of chamberlains’ keys from the 18th and 19th centuries in various European courts is preserved in the British Museum. These ends are adorned with crowns, royal monograms, and ciphers. The word “key” is also used by analogy to refer to things that help to open or close anything, or to clarify what is hidden. It can describe a solution to the arrangement of letters or words in a cipher, a solution to mathematical or other problems, or a translation of exercises or books, etc., from a foreign language. The term is also figuratively used for areas of strategic importance. For example, Gibraltar, known as the “Key of the Mediterranean,” was granted in 1462 by Henry IV of Castile, with the arms, gules, depicting a castle and a key hanging from the gate, or; these arms represent the badge of the 50th regiment of foot (now the 2nd Batt. Essex Regiment) in the British Army, commemorating its role in the siege of 1782. The word is also commonly used for various mechanical tools designed to loosen or unfasten a valve, nut, bolt, etc., such as a spanner or wrench, and for the instruments used to tune a piano or harp or to wind clocks or watches. Additionally, the term can refer to devices that lock or secure different parts of a structure, such as the “keystone” of an arch, the wedge or piece of wood, metal, etc., that fixes a joint, or a small U-shaped metal tool used to secure bindings during bookbinding.
In musical instruments the term “key” is applied in certain wind instruments, particularly of the wood-wind type, to the levers which open and close valves in order to produce various notes, and in keyboard instruments, such as the organ or the pianoforte, to the exterior white or black parts of the levers which either open or shut the valves to admit the wind from the bellows to the pipes or to release the hammers against the strings (see Keyboard). It is from this application of the word to these levers in musical instruments that the term is also used of the parts pressed by the finger in typewriters and in telegraphic instruments.
In musical instruments, the term "key" refers to the levers in certain wind instruments, especially woodwinds, that open and close valves to create different notes. In keyboard instruments, such as the organ or piano, it describes the outer white or black parts of the levers that either open or close the valves to let air from the bellows into the pipes or to hit the strings with hammers (see Keyboard). This usage of the word for levers in musical instruments extends to the parts pressed by fingers in typewriters and telegraphic devices.
A key is the insignia of the office of chamberlain in a royal household (see Chamberlain and Lord Chamberlain). The “power of the keys” (clavium potestas) in ecclesiastical usage represents the authority given by Christ to Peter by the words, “I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. xvi. 19). This is claimed by the Roman Church to have been transmitted to the popes as the successors of St Peter.
A key symbolizes the role of chamberlain in a royal household (see Chamberlain and Lord Chamberlain). The "power of the keys" (clavium potestas) in church terms represents the authority Christ gave to Peter when He said, "I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. xvi. 19). The Roman Church claims that this authority has been passed down to the popes as the successors of St. Peter.
“Key” was formerly the common spelling of “quay,” a wharf, and is still found in America for “cay,” an island reef or sandbank off the coast of Florida (see Quay).
“Key” was previously the standard spelling of “quay,” a wharf, and is still used in America for “cay,” an island reef or sandbank off the coast of Florida (see Quay).
The origin of the name Keys or House of Keys, the lower branch of the legislature, the court of Tynwald, of the Isle of Man, has been much discussed, but it is generally accepted that it is a particular application of the word “key” by English- and not Manx-speaking 768 people. According to A. W. Moore, History of the Isle of Man, i. 160 sqq. (1900), in the Manx statutes and records the name of the house was in 1417 Claves Manniae et Claves legis, Keys of Man and Keys of the Law; but the popular and also the documentary name till 1585 seems to have been “the 24,” in Manx Kiare as feed. From 1585 to 1734 the name was in the statutes, &c., “the 24 Keys,” or simply “the Keys.” Moore suggests that the name was possibly originally due to an English “clerk of the rolls,” the members of the house being called in to “unlock or solve the difficulties of the law.” There is no evidence for the suggestion that Keys is an English corruption of Kiare-as, the first part of Kiare as feed. Another suggestion is that it is from a Scandinavian word keise, chosen.
The origin of the name Keys or House of Keys, the lower branch of the legislature, the court of Tynwald, of the Isle of Man, has been widely debated, but it's generally agreed that it's a specific use of the word “key” by English speakers rather than Manx speakers. According to A. W. Moore, History of the Isle of Man, i. 160 sqq. (1900), in the Manx statutes and records, the name of the house was in 1417 Claves Manniae et Claves legis, Keys of Man and Keys of the Law; however, the popular and documentary name until 1585 seems to have been “the 24,” in Manx Kiare as feed. From 1585 to 1734, the name was officially “the 24 Keys,” or simply “the Keys.” Moore suggests that the name might have originally come from an English “clerk of the rolls,” with the house members called in to “unlock or resolve the issues of the law.” There is no evidence supporting the idea that Keys is an English corruption of Kiare-as, the first part of Kiare as feed. Another suggestion is that it comes from a Scandinavian word keise, meaning chosen.

KEYBOARD, or Manual (Fr. clavier; Ger. Klaviatur; Ital. tastatura), a succession of keys for unlocking sound in stringed, wind or percussion musical instruments, together with the case or board on which they are arranged. The two principal types of keyboard instruments are the organ and the piano; their keyboards, although similarly constructed, differ widely in scope and capabilities. The keyboard of the organ, a purely mechanical contrivance, is the external means of communicating with the valves or pallets that open and close the entrances to the pipes. As its action is incapable of variation at the will of the performer, the keyboard of the organ remains without influence on the quality and intensity of the sound. The keyboard of the piano, on the contrary, besides its purely mechanical function, also forms a sympathetic vehicle of transmission for the performer’s rhythmical and emotional feeling, in consequence of the faithfulness with which it passes on the impulses communicated by the fingers. The keyboard proper does not, in instruments of the organ and piano types, contain the complete mechanical apparatus for directly unlocking the sound, but only that external part of it which is accessible to the performer.
KEYBOARD, or Guide (Fr. clavier; Ger. Klaviatur; Ital. tastatura), is a series of keys used to produce sound in string, wind, or percussion instruments, along with the case or board they’re arranged on. The two main types of keyboard instruments are the organ and the piano; while both keyboards are similarly built, they differ significantly in function and capabilities. The keyboard of the organ, which operates mechanically, serves as the means to open and close the valves or pallets leading to the pipes. Since its action can't be changed at the performer’s discretion, the organ’s keyboard doesn’t affect the quality or strength of the sound. In contrast, the piano’s keyboard, in addition to its mechanical role, also helps convey the performer’s rhythm and emotions because it accurately transmits the impulses from the fingers. The keyboard itself, in instruments like the organ and piano, does not contain the entire mechanical system for creating sound but only that accessible part for the performer.
The first instrument provided with a keyboard was the organ; we must therefore seek for the prototype of the modern keyboard in connexion with the primitive instrument which marks the transition between the mere syrinx provided with bellows, in which all the pipes sounded at once unless stopped by the fingers, and the first organ in which sound was elicited from a pipe only when unlocked by means of some mechanical contrivance. The earliest contrivance was the simple slider, unprovided with a key or touch-piece and working in a groove like the lid of a box, which was merely pushed in or drawn out to open or close the hole that formed the communication between the wind chest and the hole in the foot of the pipe. These sliders fulfilled in a simple manner the function of the modern keys, and preceded the groove and pallet system of the modern organ. We have no clear or trustworthy information concerning the primitive organ with sliders. Athanasius Kircher1 gives a drawing of a small mouth-blown instrument under the name of Magraketha (Mashroqitha’, Dan. iii. 5), and Ugolini2 describes a similar one, but with a pair of bellows, as the magrēphah of the treatise ‘Arākhīn.3 By analogy with the evolution of the organ in central and western Europe from the 8th to the 15th century, of which we are able to study the various stages, we may conclude that in principle both drawings were probably fairly representative, even if nothing better than efforts of the imagination to illustrate a text.
The first instrument with a keyboard was the organ; so we should look for the origins of the modern keyboard in relation to the early instrument that bridges the gap between the simple syrinx with bellows, where all the pipes sounded together unless silenced by fingers, and the first organ, where sound was produced from a pipe only when activated by some mechanical device. The earliest device was the simple slider, which didn’t have a key or touch piece and operated in a groove like a box lid, pushed in or pulled out to open or close the connection between the wind chest and the opening at the bottom of the pipe. These sliders effectively carried out the role of modern keys, preceding the groove and pallet system found in today’s organs. We don’t have clear or reliable information about the early organ with sliders. Athanasius Kircher1 provides a drawing of a small mouth-blown instrument called Magraketha (Mashroqitha’, Dan. iii. 5), and Ugolini2 describes a similar one, but with a pair of bellows, as the magrēphah in the treatise ‘Arākhīn.3 By looking at the evolution of the organ in central and western Europe from the 8th to the 15th century, stages of which we can examine, we can conclude that both drawings were likely quite representative in principle, even if they are perhaps merely imaginative attempts to illustrate a text.
The invention of the keyboard with balanced keys has been placed by some writers as late as the 13th or 14th century, in spite of its having been described by both Hero of Alexandria and Vitruvius and mentioned by poets and writers. The misconception probably arose from the easy assumption that the organ was the product of Western skill and that the primitive instruments with sliders found in 11th century documents4 represent the sum of the progress made in the evolution; in reality they were the result of a laborious effort to reconquer a lost art. The earliest trace of a balanced keyboard we possess is contained in Hero’s description of the hydraulic organ said to have been invented by Ctesibius of Alexandria in the 2nd century B.C. After describing the other parts (see Organ), Hero passes on to the sliders with perforations corresponding with the open feet of the speaking pipes which, when drawn forward, traverse and block the pipes. He describes the following contrivances: attached to the slider is a three-limbed, pivoted elbow-key, which, when depressed, pushes the slider inwards; in order to provide for its automatic return when the finger is lifted from the key, a slip of horn is attached by a gut string to each elbow-key. When the key is depressed and the slider pushed home, the gut string pulls the slip of horn and straightens it. As soon as the key is released, the piece of horn, regaining its natural bent by its own elasticity, pulls the slider out so that the perforation of the slider overlaps and the pipe is silenced.5 The description of the keyboard by Vitruvius Pollio, a variant of that of Hero, is less accurate and less complete.6 From evidence discussed in the article Organ, it is clear that the principle of a balanced keyboard was well understood both in the 2nd and in the 5th century A.D. After this all trace of this important development disappears, sliders of all kinds with and without handles doing duty for keys until the 12th or 13th century, when we find the small portative organs furnished with narrow keys which appear to be balanced; the single bellows were manipulated by one hand while the other fingered the keys. As this little instrument was mainly used to accompany the voice in simple chaunts, it needed few keys, at most nine or twelve. The pipes were flue-pipes. A similar little instrument, having tiny invisible pipes furnished with beating reeds and a pair of bellows (therefore requiring two performers) was known as the regal. There are representations of these medieval balanced keyboards with keys of various shapes, the most common being the rectangular with or without rounded corners and the T-shaped. Until the 14th century all the keys were in one row and of the same level, and although the B flat was used for modulation, it was merely placed between A and B natural in the sequence of notes. During the 14th century small square additional keys made their appearance, one or two to the octave, inserted between the others in the position of our black keys but not raised. An example of this keyboard is reproduced by J. F. Riaño7 from a fresco in the Cistercian monastery of Nuestra Señora de Piedra in Aragon, dated 1390.
The invention of the keyboard with balanced keys has been dated by some writers to as late as the 13th or 14th century, despite being described by both Hero of Alexandria and Vitruvius and mentioned by poets and writers. This misunderstanding likely came from the assumption that the organ was a Western creation and that the primitive instruments with sliders found in 11th-century documents4 represented the total progress made in the evolution; in reality, they were the result of a painstaking effort to regain a lost art. The earliest record of a balanced keyboard we have is found in Hero’s description of the hydraulic organ said to have been invented by Ctesibius of Alexandria in the 2nd century BCE After detailing the other parts (see Organ), Hero moves on to the sliders with holes that match the open feet of the speaking pipes, which, when pulled forward, close off the pipes. He describes the following mechanisms: attached to the slider is a three-limbed, pivoted elbow-key that, when pressed down, pushes the slider inward; to ensure it automatically returns when the finger is lifted from the key, a piece of horn is attached by a gut string to each elbow-key. When the key is pressed and the slider is pushed in, the gut string pulls the piece of horn and straightens it. As soon as the key is released, the piece of horn, regaining its natural curve due to its own elasticity, pulls the slider out so that the hole in the slider overlaps and silences the pipe.5 Vitruvius Pollio’s description of the keyboard, a variant of Hero’s, is less accurate and less complete.6 From the evidence discussed in the article Organ, it’s clear that the concept of a balanced keyboard was well understood in both the 2nd and the 5th century CE After this, all evidence of this significant development disappears, with sliders of all kinds, with and without handles, serving as keys until the 12th or 13th century, when we find small portative organs with narrow keys that seem to be balanced; a single bellows was operated by one hand while the other played the keys. As this small instrument was mainly used to accompany the voice in simple chants, it required few keys, at most nine or twelve. The pipes were flue pipes. A similar small instrument, featuring tiny invisible pipes with beating reeds and a pair of bellows (thus needing two players) was known as the regal. There are depictions of these medieval balanced keyboards with keys of various shapes, the most common being rectangular with or without rounded corners, and T-shaped. Until the 14th century, all the keys were in a single row and at the same level, and although B flat was used for modulation, it was simply placed between A and B natural in the sequence of notes. During the 14th century, small square additional keys appeared, one or two to an octave, inserted among the others in the position of our black keys but not raised. An example of this keyboard is reproduced by J. F. Riaño7 from a fresco in the Cistercian monastery of Nuestra Señora de Piedra in Aragon, dated 1390.
So far the history of the keyboard is that of the organ. The only stringed instruments with keys before this date were the organistrum and the hurdy-gurdy, in which little tongues of wood manipulated by handles or keys performed the function of the fingers in stopping the strings on the neck of the instruments, but they did not influence the development of the keyboard. The advent of the immediate precursors of the pianoforte was at hand. In the Wunderbuch8 (1440), preserved in the Grand Ducal Library at Weimar, are represented a number of musical instruments, all named. Among them are a clavichordium and a clavicymbalum with narrow additional keys let in between the wider ones, one to every group of two large keys. The same arrangement prevailed in a clavicymbalum figured in an anonymous MS. attributed to the 14th century, preserved in the public library at Ghent9; from the lettering over the jacks and strings, of which there are but eight, it would seem as though the draughtsman had left the accidentals out of the scheme of notation. These are the earliest known representations of instruments with keyboards. The exact date at which our chromatic keyboard came into use has not been discovered, but it existed in the 15th century and may be studied in the picture of St Cecilia playing the organ on the Ghent altarpiece painted by the brothers Hubert and Jan van Eyck. Praetorius distinctly states that the large Halberstadt organ had the keyboard which he figures (plates xxiv. and xxv.) from the outset, and reproduces the inscription asserting that the organ was built in 1361 by the priest Nicolas Fabri and was renovated in 1495 by Gregorius Kleng. The keyboard of this organ has the arrangement of the present day with raised black notes; it is not improbable that Praetorius’s statement was correct, for Germany and the Netherlands led the van in organ-building during the middle ages.
So far, the history of the keyboard has been tied to the organ. The only string instruments with keys before this time were the organistrum and the hurdy-gurdy, where small wooden tongues moved by handles or keys acted like fingers to stop the strings on the instruments' necks, but they did not influence the keyboard's development. The immediate precursors of the pianoforte were on the horizon. In the Wunderbuch8 (1440), preserved in the Grand Ducal Library at Weimar, several named musical instruments are depicted. Among them are a clavichordium and a clavicymbalum featuring narrow additional keys placed between the wider ones, with one narrow key for every two large keys. The same layout appears in a clavicymbalum illustrated in an anonymous manuscript attributed to the 14th century, housed in the public library at Ghent9; based on the letters above the jacks and the strings, which number only eight, it seems the artist left the accidentals out of the notation scheme. These are the earliest known depictions of instruments with keyboards. The exact date when our chromatic keyboard came into use hasn’t been pinpointed, but it did exist in the 15th century, as shown in the painting of St. Cecilia playing the organ on the Ghent altarpiece created by brothers Hubert and Jan van Eyck. Praetorius explicitly mentions that the large Halberstadt organ had the keyboard depicted (plates xxiv. and xxv.) from the beginning and includes the inscription stating that the organ was built in 1361 by priest Nicolas Fabri and renovated in 1495 by Gregorius Kleng. The keyboard of this organ has the modern arrangement with raised black notes; it’s quite possible that Praetorius’s claim was accurate, as Germany and the Netherlands were leaders in organ-building during the Middle Ages.
At the beginning of the 16th century, to facilitate the playing of contrapuntal music having a drone bass or point d’orgue, the arrangement of the pipes of organs and of the strings of spinets and harpsichords was altered, with the result that the lowest octave of the keyboard was made in what is known as short measure, or mi, ré, ut, i.e. a diatonic with B flat included, but grouped in the space of a sixth instead of appearing as a full octave. In order to carry out this device, the note below F was C, instead of E, the missing D and E and the B flat being substituted for the three sharps of F, G and A, and appearing as black notes, thus:—
At the start of the 16th century, to make it easier to play contrapuntal music with a drone bass or point d’orgue, the setup of organ pipes and the strings of spinets and harpsichords was changed. This led to the lowest octave of the keyboard being configured in what is called short measure, or mi, ré, ut, i.e. a diatonic scale with B flat included, but arranged within the space of a sixth instead of showing as a full octave. To implement this change, the note below F was C instead of E, with the missing D and E and the B flat replacing the three sharps of F, G, and A, appearing as black notes, thus:—
D E B♭
C F G A B C,
D E B♭
C F G A B C,
or if the lowest note appeared to be B, it sounded as G and the arrangement was as follows:—
or if the lowest note seemed to be B, it sounded like G and the arrangement was as follows:—
A B
G C D E F G.
A B
G C D E F G.
This was the most common scheme for the short octave during the 16th and 17th centuries, although others are occasionally found. Praetorius also gives examples in which the black notes of the short octave were divided into two halves, or separate keys, the forward 769 half for the drone note, the back half for the chromatic semitone, thus:—
This was the most common setup for the short octave during the 16th and 17th centuries, although other variations are sometimes seen. Praetorius also provides examples where the black notes of the short octave were split into two parts, or separate keys, with the front part for the drone note and the back part for the chromatic semitone, like this:—

This arrangement, which accomplishes its object without sacrifice, was to be found early in the 17th century in the organs of the monasteries of Riddageshausen and of Bayreuth in Vogtland.
This setup, which achieves its goal without compromise, was present early in the 17th century in the organs of the monasteries of Riddageshausen and Bayreuth in Vogtland.
See A. J. Hipkins, History of the Pianoforte (London, 1896), and the older works of Girolamo Diruta (1597), Praetorius (1618), and Mersenne (1636).
See A. J. Hipkins, History of the Pianoforte (London, 1896), and the earlier works of Girolamo Diruta (1597), Praetorius (1618), and Mersenne (1636).
2 Thes. Antiq. Sacra. (Venice, 1744-1769), xxxii. 477.
2 Thes. Antiq. Sacra. (Venice, 1744-1769), xxxii. 477.
3 II. 3 and fol. 10, 2. ‘Arākhīn (“Valuations”) is a treatise in the Babylonian Talmud. The word Magrephah occurs in the Mishna, the description of the instrument in the gemārā.
3 II. 3 and fol. 10, 2. ‘Arākhīn (“Valuations”) is a discussion in the Babylonian Talmud. The term Magrephah appears in the Mishna, with the details of the instrument found in the gemārā.
5 See the original Greek with translation by Charles Maclean in “The Principle of the Hydraulic Organ,” Intern. Musikges. vi. 2, 219-220 (Leipzig 1905).
5 See the original Greek with translation by Charles Maclean in “The Principle of the Hydraulic Organ,” Intern. Musikges. vi. 2, 219-220 (Leipzig 1905).
6 See Clément Loret’s account in Revue archéologique, pp. 76-102 (Paris, 1890).
6 See Clément Loret’s account in Revue archéologique, pp. 76-102 (Paris, 1890).
8 Reproduced by Dr Alwin Schulz in Deutsches Leben im XIV. u. XV. Jhdt., figs. 522 seq. (Vienna, 1892).
8 Reproduced by Dr. Alwin Schulz in German Life in the 14th and 15th Centuries, figs. 522 and following. (Vienna, 1892).
9 “De diversis monocordis, pentacordis, etc., ex quibus diversa formantur instrumenta musica,” reproduced by Edm. van der Straeten in Hist. de la musique aux Pays-Bas, i. 278.
9 “On various single-string, five-string, etc. instruments, from which different musical instruments are made,” reproduced by Edm. van der Straeten in History of Music in the Netherlands, i. 278.

KEYSTONE, the central voussoir of an arch (q.v.). The Etruscans and the Romans emphasized its importance by decorating it with figures and busts, and, in their triumphal arches, projected it forward and utilized it as an additional support to the architrave above. Throughout the Italian period it forms an important element in the design, and serves to connect the arch with the horizontal mouldings running above it. In Gothic architecture there is no keystone, but the junction of pointed ribs at their summit is sometimes decorated with a boss to mask the intersection.
KEYSTONE, the central stone at the top of an arch (q.v.). The Etruscans and the Romans highlighted its significance by decorating it with figures and busts. In their triumphal arches, they pushed it forward and used it as extra support for the architrave above. Throughout the Italian period, it was a key element in the design, connecting the arch with the horizontal moldings above it. In Gothic architecture, there isn't a keystone, but the meeting point of the pointed ribs at the top is sometimes adorned with a decorative boss to cover the intersection.

KEY WEST (from the Spanish Cayo Hueso, “Bone Reef”), a city, port of entry, and the county-seat of Monroe county, Florida, U.S.A., situated on a small coral island (4½ m. long and about 1 m. wide) of the same name, 60 m. S. W. of Cape Sable, the most southerly point of the mainland. It is connected by lines of steamers with Miami and Port Tampa, with Galveston, Texas, with Mobile, Alabama, with Philadelphia and New York City, and with West Indian ports, and by regular schooner lines with New York City, the Bahamas, British Honduras, &c. There is now an extension of the Florida East Coast railway from Miami to Key West (155 m.). Pop. (1880), 9890; (1890), 18,080; (1900), 17,114, of whom 7266 were foreign-born and 5562 were negroes; (1910 census), 19,945. The island is notable for its tropical vegetation and climate. The jasmine, almond, banana, cork and coco-nut palm are among the trees. The oleander grows here to be a tree, and there is a banyan tree, said to be the only one growing out of doors in the United States. There are many species of plants in Key West not found elsewhere in North America. The mean annual temperature is 76° F., and the mean of the hottest months is 82.2° F.; that of the coldest months is 69° F.; thus the mean range of temperature is only 13°. The precipitation is 35 in.; most of the rain falls in the “rainy season” from May to November, and is preserved in cisterns by the inhabitants as the only supply of drinking water. The number of cloudy days per annum averages 60. The city occupies the highest portion of the island. The harbour accommodates vessels drawing 27 ft.; vessels of 27-30 ft. draft can enter by either the “Main Ship” channel or the south-west channel; the south-east channel admits vessels of 25 ft. draft or less; and four other channels may be used by vessels of 15-19 ft. draft. The harbour is defended by Fort Taylor, built on the island of Key West in 1846, and greatly improved and modernized after the Spanish-American War of 1898. Among the buildings are the United States custom house, the city hall, a convent, and a public library.
KEY WEST (from the Spanish Cayo Hueso, “Bone Reef”), is a city, port of entry, and the county seat of Monroe County, Florida, U.S.A. It’s located on a small coral island (4.5 miles long and about 1 mile wide) of the same name, 60 miles southwest of Cape Sable, the southernmost point of the mainland. It’s connected by steamship lines to Miami and Port Tampa, Galveston, Texas, Mobile, Alabama, Philadelphia, New York City, and various West Indian ports, as well as by regular schooner lines to New York City, the Bahamas, British Honduras, and more. There’s now an extension of the Florida East Coast Railway from Miami to Key West (155 miles). The population was 9,890 in 1880; 18,080 in 1890; and 17,114 in 1900, of which 7,266 were foreign-born and 5,562 were Black. According to the 1910 census, the population was 19,945. The island is known for its tropical vegetation and climate, featuring trees such as jasmine, almond, banana, cork, and coconut palms. The oleander grows here as a tree, and there's a banyan tree that is said to be the only one growing outdoors in the United States. Many plant species in Key West are unique to North America. The average annual temperature is 76°F, with an average of 82.2°F during the hottest months and 69°F during the coldest months, creating a mean temperature range of only 13°. Annual precipitation is 35 inches, mostly occurring during the “rainy season” from May to November, which residents collect in cisterns as their only source of drinking water. The average number of cloudy days per year is 60. The city is located on the highest part of the island. The harbor can accommodate vessels drawing up to 27 feet; vessels with a draft of 27-30 feet can enter through either the “Main Ship” channel or the southwest channel, while the southeast channel admits vessels with a 25-foot draft or less, and four other channels are available for vessels with a draft of 15-19 feet. The harbor is protected by Fort Taylor, constructed on Key West in 1846 and significantly improved and modernized after the Spanish-American War of 1898. Notable buildings include the United States Customs House, the City Hall, a convent, and a public library.
In 1869 the insignificant population of Key West was greatly increased by Cubans who left their native island after an attempt at revolution; they engaged in the manufacture of tobacco, and Key West cigars were soon widely known. Towards the close of the 19th century this industry suffered from labour troubles, from the competition of Tampa, Florida, and from the commercial improvement of Havana, Cuba; but soon after 1900 the tobacco business of Key West began to recover. Immigrants from the Bahama Islands form another important element in the population. They are known as “Conchs,” and engage in sponge fishing. In 1905 the value of factory products was $4,254,024 (an increase of 37.7% over the value in 1900); the exports in 1907 were valued at $852,457; the imports were valued at $994,472, the excess over the exports being due to the fact that the food supply of the city is derived from other Florida ports and from the West Indies.
In 1869, the small population of Key West grew significantly with the arrival of Cubans who fled their home island after a failed revolution. They started making tobacco, and Key West cigars quickly became well-known. By the end of the 19th century, this industry faced challenges from labor disputes, competition from Tampa, Florida, and the commercial development of Havana, Cuba. However, shortly after 1900, Key West's tobacco business began to bounce back. Immigrants from the Bahama Islands also make up a significant part of the population. They are referred to as “Conchs” and are involved in sponge fishing. In 1905, the value of factory products reached $4,254,024, which was a 37.7% increase from 1900. By 1907, exports were valued at $852,457, while imports were valued at $994,472, with the surplus of imports mainly due to the city’s food supply coming from other Florida ports and the West Indies.
According to tradition the native Indian tribes of Key West, after being almost annihilated by the Caloosas, fled to Cuba. There are relics of early European occupation of the island which suggest that it was once the resort of pirates. The city was settled about 1822. The Seminole War and the war of the United States with Mexico gave it some military importance. In 1861 Confederate forces attempted to seize Fort Taylor, but they were successfully resisted by General William H. French.
According to tradition, the native Indian tribes of Key West, after being nearly wiped out by the Caloosas, escaped to Cuba. There are remnants of early European settlement on the island that suggest it was once a hideout for pirates. The city was established around 1822. The Seminole War and the U.S. war with Mexico gave it some military significance. In 1861, Confederate forces tried to capture Fort Taylor, but they were successfully resisted by General William H. French.

KHABAROVSK (known as Khabarovka until 1895), a town of Asiatic Russia, capital of the Amur region and of the Maritime Province. Pop. (1897), 14,932. It was founded in 1858 and is situated on a high cliff on the right bank of the Amur, at its confluence with the Usuri, in 48° 28′ N. and 135° 6′ E. It is connected by rail with Vladivostok (480 m.), and is an important entrepôt for goods coming down the Usuri and its tributary the Sungacha, as well as a centre of trade, especially in sables. The town is built of wood, and has a large cathedral, a monument (1891) to Count Muraviev-Amurskiy, a cadet corps (new building 1904), a branch of the Russian Geographical Society, with museum, and a technical railway school.
KHABAROVSK (formerly called Khabarovsk until 1895), is a town in Eastern Russia, serving as the capital of the Amur region and the Maritime Province. Its population in 1897 was 14,932. Founded in 1858, it’s located on a high cliff on the right bank of the Amur River, where it meets the Usuri River, at coordinates 48° 28′ N. and 135° 6′ E. The town is connected by rail to Vladivostok (480 miles away) and acts as a key hub for goods flowing down the Usuri and its tributary, the Sungacha, and is especially significant for trade in sables. The town features wooden buildings, a large cathedral, a monument (erected in 1891) honoring Count Muraviev-Amurskiy, a cadet corps (new building from 1904), a branch of the Russian Geographical Society that includes a museum, and a technical railway school.

KHAIRAGARH, a feudatory state in the Central Provinces, India. Area, 931 sq. m.; pop. (1901), 137,554, showing a decrease of 24% in the decade due to the effects of famine; estimated revenue, £20,000; tribute £4600. The chief, who is descended from the old Gond royal family, received the title of raja as an hereditary distinction in 1898. The state includes a fertile plain, yielding rice and cotton. Its prosperity has been promoted by the Bengal-Nagpur railway, which has a station at Dongargarh, the largest town (pop. 5856), connected by road with Khairagarh town, the residence of the raja.
KHAIRAGARH, is a feudatory state in the Central Provinces of India. It has an area of 931 square miles and a population of 137,554 as of 1901, reflecting a 24% decline over the decade due to famine. The estimated revenue is £20,000, with a tribute of £4,600. The chief, who comes from the old Gond royal family, was granted the title of raja as an hereditary honor in 1898. The state features a fertile plain that produces rice and cotton. Its prosperity has been boosted by the Bengal-Nagpur railway, which has a station at Dongargarh, the largest town (population 5,856), connected by road to Khairagarh town, the residence of the raja.

KHAIREDDIN (Khair-ed-Din = “Joy of Religion”) (d. 1890), Turkish statesman, was of Circassian race, but nothing is known about his birth and parentage. In early boyhood he was in the hands of a Tunisian slave-dealer, by whom he was sold to Hamuda Pasha, then bey of Tunis, who gave him his freedom and a French education. When Khaireddin left school the bey made him steward of his estates, and from this position he rose to be minister of finance. When the prime minister, Mahmud ben Ayad, absconded to France with the treasure-chest of the beylic, Hamuda despatched Khaireddin to obtain the extradition of the fugitive. The mission failed; but the six years it occupied enabled Khaireddin to make himself widely known in France, to become acquainted with French political ideas and administrative methods, and, on his return to Tunisia, to render himself more than ever useful to his government. Hamuda died while Khaireddin was in France, but he was highly appreciated by the three beys—Ahmet (1837), Mohammed (1855), and Sadok (1859)—who in turn followed Hamuda, and to his influence was due the sequence of liberal measures which distinguished their successive reigns. Khaireddin also secured for the reigning family the confirmation from the sultan of Turkey of their right of succession to the beylic. But although Khaireddin’s protracted residence in France had imbued him with liberal ideas, it had not made him a French partisan, and he strenuously opposed the French scheme of establishing a protectorate over Tunisia upon which France embarked in the early ’seventies. This rendered him obnoxious to Sadok’s prime minister—an apostate Jew named Mustapha ben Ismael—who succeeded in completely undermining the bey’s confidence in him. His position thus became untenable in Tunisia, and shortly after the accession of Abdul Hamid he acquainted the sultan with his desire to enter the Turkish service. In 1877 the sultan bade him come to Constantinople, and on his arrival gave him a seat on the Reform Commission then sitting at Tophane. Early in 1879 the sultan appointed him grand vizier, and shortly afterwards he prepared a scheme of constitutional government, but Abdul Hamid refused to have anything to do with it. Thereupon Khaireddin resigned office, on the 28th of July 1879. More than once the sultan offered him anew the grand vizierate, but Khaireddin persistently refused it, and thus incurred disfavour. He died on the 30th of January 1890, practically a prisoner in his own house.
KHAIREDDIN (Khair-ed-Din = “Joy of Religion”) (d. 1890), a Turkish statesman of Circassian descent, has little known about his birth or family background. As a young boy, he was sold by a Tunisian slave dealer to Hamuda Pasha, who was then the bey of Tunis. Hamuda gave him his freedom and a French education. After finishing school, Khaireddin became the steward of Hamuda’s estates and eventually advanced to the position of finance minister. When the prime minister, Mahmud ben Ayad, fled to France with the bey’s treasure, Hamuda sent Khaireddin to attempt to extradite him. This mission was unsuccessful; however, the six years spent there helped Khaireddin gain recognition in France, learn about French political ideas and administrative practices, and made him even more valuable to his government upon his return to Tunisia. Hamuda passed away while Khaireddin was in France, but he was highly regarded by the three subsequent beys—Ahmet (1837), Mohammed (1855), and Sadok (1859)—who followed Hamuda, and thanks to his influence, they implemented a series of liberal reforms during their reigns. Khaireddin also secured confirmation from the Sultan of Turkey of their right to succeed to the beylic. However, despite Khaireddin’s extended stay in France, which exposed him to liberal ideas, he did not become a supporter of France. He strongly opposed the French plan to establish a protectorate over Tunisia, which France pursued in the early 1870s. This stance made him unpopular with Sadok’s prime minister, an apostate Jew named Mustapha ben Ismael, who successfully undermined the bey’s trust in him. Consequently, his position in Tunisia became untenable, and shortly after Abdul Hamid ascended to the throne, Khaireddin expressed his wish to join the Turkish service. In 1877, the sultan invited him to Constantinople and granted him a seat on the Reform Commission that was taking place at Tophane. Early in 1879, the sultan appointed him grand vizier, but shortly after, Khaireddin proposed a plan for constitutional government, which Abdul Hamid rejected. Khaireddin then resigned from his position on July 28, 1879. The sultan offered him the grand vizierate several times afterward, but Khaireddin continually declined, which led to his unpopularity. He died on January 30, 1890, effectively a prisoner in his own home.

KHAIRPUR, or Khyrpoor, a native state of India, in the Sind province of Bombay. Area, 6050 sq. m.; pop. (1901), 770 199,313, showing an apparent increase of 55% in the decade; estimated revenue, £90,000. Like other parts of Sind, Khairpur consists of a great alluvial plain, very rich and fertile in the neighbourhood of the Indus and the irrigation canals, the remaining area being a continuous series of sand-hill ridges covered with a stunted brushwood, where cultivation is altogether impossible. A small ridge of limestone hills passes through the northern part of the state, being a continuation of a ridge known as the Ghar, running southwards from Rohri. The state is watered by five canals drawn off from the Indus, besides the Eastern Nara, a canal which follows an old bed of the Indus. In the desert tracts are pits of natron.
KHAIRPUR, or Khairpur, a native state of India, located in the Sind province of Bombay. Area: 6050 sq. miles; population (1901), 770 199,313, showing an apparent increase of 55% over the decade; estimated revenue, £90,000. Like other areas in Sind, Khairpur features a vast alluvial plain that is very rich and fertile near the Indus and irrigation canals, while the rest consists of a continuous series of sand-hill ridges covered with sparse brushwood, where cultivation is not possible at all. A small ridge of limestone hills runs through the northern part of the state, continuing from a ridge known as the Ghar, which extends southwards from Rohri. The state is supplied with water from five canals taken from the Indus, in addition to the Eastern Nara, a canal that follows an old bed of the Indus. In the desert regions, there are pits of natron.
Khairpur town is situated on a canal 15 m. E. of the Indus, with a railway station, 20 m. S. of Sukkur, on the Kotri-Rohri branch of the North-Western railway, which here crosses a corner of the state. Pop. (1901), 14,014. There are manufactures of cloth, carpets, goldsmiths’ work and arms, and an export trade in indigo, grain and oilseeds.
Khairpur is a town located along a canal, 15 miles east of the Indus River, and has a railway station 20 miles south of Sukkur on the Kotri-Rohri branch of the North-Western railway, which crosses a corner of the state. The population in 1901 was 14,014. The town produces textiles, carpets, jewelry, and weapons, and it exports indigo, grain, and oilseeds.
The chief, or mir, of Khairpur belongs to a Baluch family, known as the Talpur, which rose on the fall of the Kalhora dynasty of Sind. About 1813, during the troubles in Kabul incidental to the establishment of the Barakzai dynasty, the mirs were able to withhold the tribute which up to that date had been somewhat irregularly paid to the rulers of Afghanistan. In 1832 the individuality of the Khairpur state was recognized by the British government in a treaty under which the use of the river Indus and the roads of Sind were secured. When the first Kabul expedition was decided on, the mir of Khairpur, Ali Murad, cordially supported the British policy; and the result was that, after the battles of Meeanee and Daba had put the whole of Sind at the disposal of the British, Khairpur was the only state allowed to retain its political existence under the protection of the paramount power. The chief mir, Faiz Mahommed Khan, G.C.I.E., who was an enlightened ruler, died in 1909, shortly after returning from a pilgrimage to the Shiite shrine of Kerbela.
The leader, or mir, of Khairpur is from the Baluch family known as the Talpur, which came to prominence after the decline of the Kalhora dynasty in Sind. Around 1813, amid the turmoil in Kabul during the rise of the Barakzai dynasty, the mirs were able to stop the tribute that had been somewhat inconsistently paid to the rulers of Afghanistan up to that point. In 1832, the British government recognized the unique status of the Khairpur state in a treaty that secured the use of the Indus River and the roads of Sind. When the first Kabul expedition was planned, Ali Murad, the mir of Khairpur, fully supported the British policy; as a result, after the battles of Meeanee and Daba gave the British control over all of Sind, Khairpur was the only state permitted to maintain its political status under the protection of the dominant power. The chief mir, Faiz Mahommed Khan, G.C.I.E., who was a progressive ruler, passed away in 1909, shortly after returning from a pilgrimage to the Shiite shrine of Kerbela.

KHAJRAHO, a village of Central India, in the state of Chhatarpur, famous for its old temples; pop. (1901), 1242. It is believed to have been the capital of the ancient kingdom of Jijhoti, corresponding with modern Bundelkhand. The temples consist of three groups: Saiva, Vaishnav and Jain, almost all built in the 10th and 11th centuries. They are covered outside and inside with elaborate sculptures, and also bear valuable inscriptions.
KHAJRAHO, is a village in Central India, located in the state of Chhatarpur, known for its ancient temples; population (1901), 1242. It is believed to have been the capital of the ancient kingdom of Jijhoti, which corresponds to modern Bundelkhand. The temples are divided into three groups: Saiva, Vaishnav, and Jain, almost all constructed in the 10th and 11th centuries. They are adorned with intricate sculptures both inside and out, and also feature valuable inscriptions.

KHAKI (from Urdu khak, dust), originally a dust-coloured fabric, of the character of canvas, drill or holland, used by the British and native armies in India. It seems to have been first worn by the Guides, a mixed regiment of frontier troops, in 1848, and to have spread to other regiments during the following years. Some at any rate of the British troops had uniforms of khaki during the Indian Mutiny (1857-58), and thereafter drill or holland (generally called “khaki” whatever its colour) became the almost universal dress of British and native troops in Asia and Africa. During the South African War of 1899-1902, drill of a sandy shade of brown was worn by all troops sent out from Great Britain and the Colonies. Khaki drill, however, proved unsuitable material for the cold weather in the uplands of South Africa, and after a time the troops were supplied with dust-coloured serge uniforms. Since 1900 all drab and green-grey uniforms have been, unofficially at any rate, designated khaki.
KHAKI (from Urdu khak, dust), originally a dust-colored fabric similar to canvas, drill, or holland, used by both British and local armies in India. It appears to have first been worn by the Guides, a mixed regiment of frontier troops, in 1848, and then spread to other regiments in the following years. Some British troops had khaki uniforms during the Indian Mutiny (1857-58), and later, drill or holland (commonly referred to as “khaki” regardless of its color) became the almost universal uniform for British and local troops in Asia and Africa. During the South African War of 1899-1902, all troops sent from Great Britain and the Colonies wore drill in a sandy shade of brown. However, khaki drill turned out to be unsuitable for the cold weather in the highlands of South Africa, and after some time, troops were provided with dust-colored serge uniforms. Since 1900, all drab and green-grey uniforms have been unofficially referred to as khaki.

KHALIFA, THE. Abdullah et Taaisha (Seyyid Abdullah ibn Seyyid Mahommed) (1846-1899), successor of the mahdi Mahommed Ahmed, born in 1846 in the south-western portion of Darfur, was a member of the Taaisha section of the Baggara or cattle-owning Arabs. His father, Mahommed et Taki, had determined to emigrate to Mecca with his family; but the unsettled state of the country long prevented him, and he died in Africa after advising his eldest son, Abdullah, to take refuge with some religious sheikh on the Nile, and to proceed to Mecca on a favourable opportunity. Abdullah, who had already had much connexion with slave-hunters, and had fought against the Egyptian conquest of Darfur, departed for the Nile valley with this purpose; hearing on the way of the disputes of Mahommed Ahmed, who had not yet claimed a sacred character, with the Egyptian officials, he went to him in spite of great difficulties, and, according to his own statement, at once recognized in him the mahdi (“guide”) divinely appointed to regenerate Islam in the latter days. His advice to Mahommed to stir up revolt in Darfur and Kordofan being justified by the result, he became his most trusted counsellor, and was soon declared principal khalifa or vicegerent of the mahdi, all of whose acts were to be regarded as the mahdi’s own. The mahdi on his deathbed (1885) solemnly named him his successor; and for thirteen years Abdullah ruled over what had been the Egyptian Sudan. Khartum was deserted by his orders, and Omdurman, at first intended as a temporary camp, was made his capital. At length the progress of Sir Herbert (afterwards Lord) Kitchener’s expedition compelled him to give battle to the Anglo-Egyptian forces near Omdurman, where on the 2nd of September 1898 his army, fighting with desperate courage, was almost annihilated. The khalifa, who had not left Omdurman since the death of the mahdi, fled to Kordofan with the remnant of his host. On the 25th of November 1899 he gave battle to a force under Colonel (afterwards General Sir) F. R. Wingate, and was slain at Om Debreikat. He met death with great fortitude, refusing to fly, and his principal amirs voluntarily perished with him.
Khalifa, The. Abdullah and Taaisha (Seyyid Abdullah ibn Seyyid Mahommed) (1846-1899), the successor of the Mahdi Mahommed Ahmed, was born in 1846 in the southwestern part of Darfur. He was part of the Taaisha group of the Baggara, or cattle-owning Arabs. His father, Mahommed et Taki, planned to move to Mecca with his family, but the unstable situation in the country delayed this, and he died in Africa after advising his oldest son, Abdullah, to seek refuge with a religious sheikh along the Nile and travel to Mecca when the opportunity arose. Abdullah, who had already dealt with slave-hunters and had fought against the Egyptian conquest of Darfur, set out for the Nile valley with this goal. Along the way, he learned about Mahommed Ahmed's disputes with Egyptian officials, who had not yet recognized him as a holy figure, and despite facing many challenges, he approached him, declaring that he immediately saw him as the Mahdi, the divinely appointed leader meant to restore Islam in the end times. Abdullah's counsel to Mahommed to incite rebellion in Darfur and Kordofan was proven right by events, making him Mahommed's most trusted advisor. He was soon named the principal Khalifa, or vicegerent of the Mahdi, with all of the Mahdi's actions considered his own. On his deathbed in 1885, the Mahdi formally named Abdullah as his successor, and for thirteen years, Abdullah governed what was formerly the Egyptian Sudan. Under his orders, Khartum was abandoned, and Omdurman, initially a temporary camp, became his capital. Eventually, Sir Herbert (later Lord) Kitchener’s expedition forced him to confront the Anglo-Egyptian forces near Omdurman, where on September 2, 1898, his army, fighting fiercely, was nearly destroyed. The Khalifa, who had not left Omdurman since the Mahdi's death, retreated to Kordofan with the remnants of his army. On November 25, 1899, he fought against a force led by Colonel (later General Sir) F. R. Wingate and was killed at Om Debreikat. He faced his death bravely, refusing to flee, and his main amirs chose to die alongside him.
The khalifa was a man of iron will and great energy, and possessed some military skill. By nature tyrannical, he was impatient of all opposition and appeared to delight in cruelty. It must be remembered, however, that he had to meet the secret or open hostility of all the tribes of the Nile valley and that his authority was dependent on his ability to overawe his opponents. He maintained in public the divine character of the power he inherited from the mahdi and inspired his followers to perform prodigies of valour. Although he treated many of his European captives with terrible severity he never had any of them executed. It is said that their presence in Omdurman ministered to his vanity—one of the most marked features of his character. In private life he showed much affection for his family.
The khalifa was a man of strong determination and high energy, and he had some military skills. By nature tyrannical, he couldn’t stand any opposition and seemed to take pleasure in cruelty. However, it's important to remember that he faced the hidden or open hostility of all the tribes in the Nile valley, and his authority relied on his ability to intimidate his opponents. Publicly, he upheld the divine nature of the power he inherited from the mahdi and motivated his followers to achieve remarkable feats of bravery. Although he treated many of his European captives with harsh severity, he never executed any of them. It is said that their presence in Omdurman fed his vanity—one of the most obvious traits of his character. In his private life, he showed a lot of affection for his family.
Personal sketches of the khalifa are given in Slatin Pasha’s Fire and Sword in the Sudan (London, 1896), and in Father Ohrwalder’s Ten Years in the Mahdi’s Camp (London, 1892). See also Sir F. R. Wingate’s Mahdiism and the Egyptian Sudan (London, 1891).
Personal sketches of the khalifa can be found in Slatin Pasha’s Fire and Sword in the Sudan (London, 1896), and in Father Ohrwalder’s Ten Years in the Mahdi’s Camp (London, 1892). Also, check out Sir F. R. Wingate’s Mahdiism and the Egyptian Sudan (London, 1891).

KHALĪL IBN AḤMAD [ABŪ ‘Abdurraḥmān ul-Khalīl Ibn Aḥmad ibn ‘Amr ibn Tamīm] (718-791), Arabian philologist, was a native of Oman. He was distinguished for having written the first Arabic dictionary and for having first classified the Arabic metres and laid down their rules. He was also a poet, and lived the ascetic life of a poor student. His grammatical work was carried on by his pupil Sībawaihī. The dictionary known as the Kitāb-ul-‘Ain is ascribed, at least in its inception, to Khalīl. It was probably finished by one of his pupils and was not known in Bagdad until 862. The words were not arranged in alphabetical order but according to physiological principles, beginning with ‘Ain and ending with Ya. The work seems to have been in existence as late as the 14th century, but is now only known from extracts in manuscript.
Khalil Ibn Ahmad [Abū 'Abdurrahmān al-Khalīl Ibn Aḥmad ibn 'Amr ibn Tamīm] (718-791), an Arabian philologist, was from Oman. He was known for writing the first Arabic dictionary and for being the first to classify Arabic meters and establish their rules. He was also a poet and lived a simple life as a poor student. His work in grammar was continued by his student Sībawaihī. The dictionary known as the Kitāb-ul-‘Ain is attributed, at least in its beginnings, to Khalīl. It was likely completed by one of his students and wasn’t known in Baghdad until 862. The words were not arranged in alphabetical order but instead followed physiological principles, starting with ‘Ain and ending with Ya. The work seems to have persisted until the 14th century, but is now only known through excerpts in manuscripts.
Various grammatical works are ascribed to Khalīl, but their authenticity seems doubtful; cf. C. Brockelmann, Gesch. der arabischen Literatur, i. 100 (Weimar, 1898).
Various grammatical works are attributed to Khalīl, but their authenticity seems questionable; see C. Brockelmann, Gesch. der arabischen Literatur, i. 100 (Weimar, 1898).

KHAMGAON, a town of India, in the Buldana district of Berar, 340 m. N.E. of Bombay. Pop. (1901), 18,341. It is an important centre of the cotton trade. The cotton market, the second in the province, was established about 1820. Khamgaon was connected in 1870 with the Great Indian Peninsula railway by a short branch line.
KHAMGAON, is a town in India, located in the Buldana district of Berar, 340 miles northeast of Bombay. The population in 1901 was 18,341. It is a key hub for the cotton trade. The cotton market, which is the second largest in the province, was established around 1820. Khamgaon was connected to the Great Indian Peninsula Railway by a short branch line in 1870.

KHAMSEH, a small but important province of Persia, between Kazvin and Tabriz. It consisted formerly of five districts, whence its name Khamseh, “the five,” but is now subdivided into seventeen districts. The language of the inhabitants is Turkish. The province pays a revenue of about £20,000 per annum, and its capital is Zenjān.
KHAMSEH, a small but significant province of Persia, located between Kazvin and Tabriz. It used to have five districts, which is why it’s called Khamseh, meaning “the five,” but is now divided into seventeen districts. The people speak Turkish. The province generates an annual revenue of around £20,000, and its capital is Zenjān.

KHAMSIN (Arabic for “fifty”), a hot oppressive wind arising in the Sahara. It blows in Egypt at intervals for about fifty days during March, April and May, and fills the air with sand. In Guinea the wind from the Sahara is known as harmattan (q.v.).
KHAMSIN (Arabic for “fifty”), a hot, oppressive wind that comes from the Sahara. It blows in Egypt intermittently for about fifty days during March, April, and May, filling the air with sand. In Guinea, the wind from the Sahara is referred to as harmattan (q.v.).

KHAMTIS, a tribe of the north-east frontier of India, dwelling in the hills bordering the Lakhimpur district of Assam. They are of Shan origin, and appear to have settled in their present abode in the middle of the 18th century. In 1839 they raided the British outpost of Sadiya, but they have since given no trouble. Their headquarters are in a valley 200 m. from Sadiya, which can be reached only over high passes and through dense jungle. In 1901 the number of speakers of Khamti was returned as only 1490, mostly in Burma.
KHAMTIS, is a tribe from the northeast border of India, living in the hills next to the Lakhimpur district of Assam. They are of Shan descent and seem to have settled in their current location in the mid-18th century. In 1839, they attacked the British outpost of Sadiya, but they haven't caused any issues since. Their main base is in a valley 200 m from Sadiya, which can only be reached by crossing high passes and through thick jungle. In 1901, the number of Khamti speakers was recorded as just 1,490, mostly in Burma.

KHAN (from the Turkī, hence Persian and Arabic Khān), a title of respect in Mahommedan countries. It is a contracted form of khāqān (khakan), a word equivalent to sovereign or emperor, used among the Mongol and Turkī-nomad hordes. The title khan was assumed by Jenghis when he became supreme ruler of the Mongols; his successors became known in Europe as the Great Khans (sometimes as the Chams, &c.) of Tatary or Cathay. Khan is still applied to semi-independent rulers, such as the khans of Russian Turkestan, or the khan of Kalat in Baluchistan, and is also used immediately after the name of rulers such as the sultan of Turkey; the meaning of the term has also extended downwards, until in Persia and Afghanistan it has become an affix to the name of any Mahommedan gentleman, like Esquire, and in India it has become a part of many Mahommedan names, especially when Pathan descent is claimed. The title of Khan Bahadur is conferred by the British government on Mahommedans and also on Parsis.
KHAN (from Turkī, thus Persian and Arabic Khān), a title of respect in Muslim countries. It’s a shortened version of khāqān (khakan), a term that means sovereign or emperor, used among the Mongol and Turkī nomadic tribes. Jenghis adopted the title khan when he became the supreme leader of the Mongols; his successors were known in Europe as the Great Khans (sometimes referred to as the Chams, etc.) of Tatary or Cathay. The title khan is still used for semi-independent rulers, like the khans of Russian Turkestan, or the khan of Kalat in Baluchistan, and is also placed right after the names of rulers such as the sultan of Turkey. The meaning of the term has also broadened so that in Persia and Afghanistan, it has become an add-on to the name of any Muslim gentleman, similar to Esquire, and in India, it has been incorporated into many Muslim names, particularly those claiming Pathan ancestry. The title Khan Bahadur is awarded by the British government to Muslims and also to Parsis.

KHANDESH, EAST and WEST, two districts of British India, in the central division of Bombay. They were formed in 1906 by the division of the old single district of Khandesh. Their areas are respectively 4544 sq. m. and 5497 sq. m., and the population on these areas in 1901 was 957,728 and 469,654. The headquarters of East Khandesh are at Jalgaon, and those of West Khandesh at Dhulia.
KHANDESH, EAST and WEST, two regions of British India, located in the central part of Bombay. They were established in 1906 when the former single district of Khandesh was divided. Their sizes are 4544 sq. miles and 5497 sq. miles, with populations in 1901 of 957,728 and 469,654, respectively. The main office for East Khandesh is in Jalgaon, while West Khandesh's is in Dhulia.
The principal natural feature is the Tapti river, which flows through both districts from east to west and divides each into two unequal parts. Of these the larger lie towards the south, and are drained by the rivers Girna, Bori and Panjhra. Northwards beyond the alluvial plain, which contains some of the richest tracts in Khandesh, the land rises towards the Satpura hills. In the centre and east the country is level, save for some low ranges of barren hills, and has in general an arid, unfertile appearance. Towards the north and west, the plain rises into a difficult and rugged country, thickly wooded, and inhabited by wild tribes of Bhils, who chiefly support themselves on the fruits of the forests and by wood-cutting. The drainage of the district centres in the Tapti, which receives thirteen principal tributaries in its course through Khandesh. None of the rivers is navigable, and the Tapti flows in too deep a bed to be useful for irrigation. The district on the whole, however, is fairly well supplied with surface water. Khandesh is not rich in minerals. A large area is under forest; but the jungles have been denuded of most of their valuable timber. Wild beasts are numerous. In 1901 the population of the old single district was 1,427,382, showing an increase of less than 1% in the decade. Of the aboriginal tribes the Bhils are the most important. They number 167,000, and formerly were a wild and lawless robber tribe. Since the introduction of British rule, the efforts made by kindly treatment, and by the offer of suitable employment, to win the Bhils from their disorderly life have been most successful. Many of them are now employed in police duties and as village watchmen. The principal crops are millets, cotton, pulse, wheat and oilseeds. There are many factories for ginning and pressing cotton, and a cotton-mill at Jalgaon. The eastern district is traversed by the Great Indian Peninsula railway, which branches at Bhusawal (an important centre of trade) towards Jubbulpore and Nagpur. Both districts are crossed by the Tapti Valley line from Surat. Khandesh suffered somewhat from famine in 1896-1897, and more severely in 1899-1900.
The main natural feature is the Tapti River, which flows through both districts from east to west and separates them into two uneven parts. The larger parts are to the south, drained by the rivers Girna, Bori, and Panjhra. North of the alluvial plain, which contains some of the richest areas in Khandesh, the land rises toward the Satpura hills. In the center and east, the country is mostly flat, except for some low ranges of barren hills, and generally appears dry and unproductive. To the north and west, the plain rises into a challenging and rugged area that is densely wooded and inhabited by wild tribes of Bhils, who primarily survive off the fruits of the forests and wood-cutting. The drainage of the district is centered around the Tapti, which gathers thirteen main tributaries along its route through Khandesh. None of the rivers are navigable, and the Tapti flows in a deep bed that isn't suitable for irrigation. Overall, however, the district has a decent supply of surface water. Khandesh lacks rich mineral resources. A large portion of the land is forested, but the jungles have lost much of their valuable timber. Wild animals are abundant. In 1901, the population of the old single district was 1,427,382, marking an increase of less than 1% over the past decade. Among the indigenous tribes, the Bhils are the most significant. They number around 167,000 and were once known as a wild and lawless robber tribe. Since British rule was established, efforts to improve their lives through kindness and job opportunities have been very effective. Many now work in police roles and as village watchmen. The main crops include millets, cotton, pulses, wheat, and oilseeds. There are several factories for ginning and pressing cotton, along with a cotton mill in Jalgaon. The eastern district is served by the Great Indian Peninsula railway, which branches at Bhusawal (a key trade center) toward Jubbulpore and Nagpur. Both districts are joined by the Tapti Valley line from Surat. Khandesh experienced some famine in 1896-1897 and more severely in 1899-1900.

KHANDWA, a town of British India, in the Nimar district of the Central Provinces, of which it is the headquarters, 353 m. N.E. of Bombay by rail. Pop. (1901), 19,401. Khandwa is an ancient town, with Jain and other temples. As a centre of trade, it has superseded the old capital of Burhanpur. It is an important railway junction, where the Malwa line from Indore meets the main line of the Great Indian Peninsula. There are factories for ginning and pressing cotton, and raw cotton is exported.
KHANDWA, is a town in British India, located in the Nimar district of the Central Provinces, where it serves as the headquarters, 353 miles northeast of Bombay by train. Population (1901) was 19,401. Khandwa is an ancient town, featuring Jain and other temples. It has become a center for trade, replacing the old capital of Burhanpur. Khandwa is an important railway junction, where the Malwa line from Indore intersects with the main line of the Great Indian Peninsula. There are factories for ginning and pressing cotton, and raw cotton is exported.

KHANSĀ (Tumāḍir bint ‘Amr, known as al-Khansā) (d. c. 645), Arabian poetess of the tribe Sulaim, a branch of Qais, was born in the later years of the 6th century and brought up in such wealth and luxury as the desert could give. Refusing the offer of Duraid ibn uṣ-Ṣimma, a poet and prince, she married Mirdās and had by him three sons. Afterwards she married again. Before the time of Islam she lost her brothers Ṣakhr and Moawiya in battle. Her elegies written on these brothers and on her father made her the most famous poetess of her time. At the fair of ‘Ukāz Nābigha Dhubyāni is said to have placed A‘sha first among the poets then present and Khansā second above Hassān ibn Thābit. Khansā with her tribe accepted Islam somewhat late, but persisted in wearing the heathen sign of mourning, against the precepts of Islam. Her four sons fought in the armies of Islam and were slain in the battle of Kadisīya. Omar wrote her a letter congratulating her on their heroic end and assigned her a pension. She died in her tent c. 645. Her daughter ‘Amra also wrote poetry. Opinion was divided among later critics as to whether Khansā or Laila (see Arabic Literature: § Poetry) was the greater.
KHANSĀ (Tumāḍir bint ‘Amr, known as al-Khansā) (d. c. 645), Arabian poet from the Sulaim tribe, a branch of Qais, was born in the late 6th century and raised in the wealth and luxury that the desert could provide. She turned down a proposal from Duraid ibn uṣ-Ṣimma, a poet and prince, and married Mirdās, with whom she had three sons. Later, she remarried. Before the rise of Islam, she lost her brothers Ṣakhr and Moawiya in battle. Her elegies for these brothers and for her father made her the most renowned poet of her time. At the fair of ‘Ukāz, it's said that Nābigha Dhubyāni placed A‘sha first among the poets present and Khansā second, ahead of Hassān ibn Thābit. Khansā and her tribe accepted Islam somewhat later, but she continued to wear the pagan mourning sign, despite the teachings of Islam. Her four sons fought for the Islamic armies and were killed in the battle of Kadisīya. Omar wrote her a letter congratulating her on their brave sacrifice and granted her a pension. She died in her tent c. 645. Her daughter ‘Amra also wrote poetry. Later critics were divided on whether Khansā or Laila (see Arabic Literature: § Poetry) was the greater poet.
Her diwan has been edited by L. Cheikho (Beirut, 1895) and translated into French by De Coppier (Beirut, 1889). Cf. T. Nöldeke’s Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Poesie der alten Araber (Hanover, 1864). Stories of her life are contained in the Kitāb ul-Aghāni, xiii. 136-147.
Her diwan was edited by L. Cheikho (Beirut, 1895) and translated into French by De Coppier (Beirut, 1889). See T. Nöldeke’s Contributions to the Knowledge of the Poetry of the Ancient Arabs (Hanover, 1864). Stories about her life can be found in the Book of Songs, xiii. 136-147.

KHAR, a small but very fertile province of Persia, known by the ancients as Choara and Choarene; pop. about 10,000. The governor of the province resides at Kishlak Khar, a large village situated 62 m. S.E. of Teheran, or at Aradān, a village 10 m. farther E. The province has an abundant water-supply from the Hableh-rūd, and produces great quantities of wheat, barley and rice. Of the £6000 which it pays to the state, more than £4000 is paid in kind—wheat, barley, straw and rice.
KHAR, is a small but very fertile province of Persia, known to ancient people as Choara and Choarene; it has a population of about 10,000. The governor of the province lives in Kishlak Khar, a large village located 62 miles southeast of Tehran, or in Aradān, a village 10 miles further east. The province has a plentiful water supply from the Hableh-rūd and produces large amounts of wheat, barley, and rice. Out of the £6000 it pays to the state, more than £4000 is paid in goods—wheat, barley, straw, and rice.

KHARAGHODA, a village of British India, in the Ahmedabad district of Bombay, situated on the Little Runn of Cutch, and the terminus of a branch railway; pop. (1901), 2108. Here is the government factory of salt, known as Baragra salt, producing nearly 2,000,000 cwt. a year, most of which is exported to other provinces in Central and Northern India.
KHARAGHODA a village in British India, located in the Ahmedabad district of Bombay, sits on the edge of the Little Runn of Kutch and is the endpoint of a branch railway; population (1901), 2,108. This is where the government salt factory, known as Baragra salt, operates, producing almost 2,000,000 hundredweight each year, most of which is exported to other regions in Central and Northern India.

KHARGA (Wah el-Kharga, the outer oasis), the largest of the Egyptian oases, and hence frequently called the Great Oasis. It lies in the Libyan desert between 24° and 26° N. and 30° and 31° E., the chief town, also called Kharga, being 435 m. by rail S. by W. of Cairo. It is reached by a narrow-gauge line (opened in 1908) from Kharga junction, a station on the Nile valley line near Farshut. The oasis consists of a depression in the desert some 1200 sq. m. in extent, and is about 100 m. long N. to S. and from 12 to 50 broad E. to W. Formerly, and into historic times, a lake occupied a considerable part of the depression, and the thick deposits of clay and sand then laid down now form the bulk of the cultivated lands of the oasis. It includes, however, a good deal of desert land. The inhabitants numbered (1907 census) 8348. They are of Berber stock. Administratively the oasis forms part of the mudiria of Assiut. It is practically rainless, and there is not now a single natural flowing spring. There are, however, numerous wells, water being obtained freely from the porous sandstone which underlies a great part of the Libyan desert. Some very ancient wells are 400 ft. deep. In water-bearing sandstones near the surface there are underground aqueducts dating from Roman times. The oasis contains many groves of date palms, there being over 60,000 adult trees in 1907. The dom palm, tamarisk, acacia and wild senna are also found. Rice, barley and wheat are the chief cereals cultivated, and lucerne for fodder. Besides agriculture the only industry is basket and mat making—from palm leaves and fibre. Since 1906 extensive boring and land reclamation works have been undertaken in the oasis.
KHARGA (Wah el-Kharga, the outer oasis) is the largest of the Egyptian oases and is often referred to as the Great Oasis. It is located in the Libyan desert between 24° and 26° N and 30° and 31° E, with the main town, also called Kharga, situated 435 km by rail south-west of Cairo. You can reach it via a narrow-gauge railway (opened in 1908) from Kharga junction, which is a stop on the Nile valley line near Farshut. The oasis is a depression in the desert covering about 1200 square kilometers, stretching around 100 km from north to south and between 12 to 50 km from east to west. Historically, a lake once filled a significant part of this depression, and the thick deposits of clay and sand formed during that time now make up most of the oasis's cultivated land. However, there is also a considerable amount of desert land. According to the 1907 census, the population was 8,348, primarily of Berber descent. The oasis is administratively part of the mudiria of Assiut. It receives virtually no rain, and there are currently no natural flowing springs. Nevertheless, there are numerous wells, with water sourced from the porous sandstone that underlies much of the Libyan desert. Some very old wells reach depths of 400 feet. In water-bearing sandstones closer to the surface, there are underground aqueducts that date back to Roman times. The oasis has many date palm groves, with over 60,000 mature trees recorded in 1907. Other vegetation includes dom palms, tamarisk, acacia, and wild senna. The main crops are rice, barley, and wheat, along with lucerne for fodder. Besides agriculture, the only other industry is the making of baskets and mats from palm leaves and fibers. Since 1906, extensive drilling and land reclamation projects have been undertaken in the oasis.
The name of the oasis appears in hieroglyphics as Kenem, and that of its capital as Hebi (the plough). In Pharaonic times it supported a large population, but the numerous ruins are mostly of later date. The principal ruin, a temple of Ammon, built under Darius, is of sandstone, 142 ft. long by 63 ft. broad and 30 ft. in height. South-east is another temple, a square stone building with the name of Antoninus Pius over one off the entrances. On the eastern escarpment of the oasis on the way to Girga are the remains of a large Roman fort with twelve bastions. On the road to Assiut is a fine Roman columbarium or dove-cote. Next to the great temple the most interesting ruin in the oasis is, however, the necropolis, a burial-place of the early Christians, placed on a hill 3 m. N. of the town of Kharga. There are some two hundred rectangular tomb buildings in unburnt brick with ornamented fronts. In most of the tombs is a chamber in which the mummy was placed, the Egyptian Christians at first continuing this method of preserving the bodies of their dead. In several of the tombs and in the chapel of the cemetery is painted the Egyptian sign of life, which was confounded with the Christian cross. The chapel is basilican; in it and in another building in the necropolis are crude frescoes of biblical subjects.
The name of the oasis appears in hieroglyphics as Kenem, and its capital is called Hebi (the plough). In ancient Egypt, it supported a large population, but most of the ruins are from later periods. The main ruin, a temple of Ammon built under Darius, is made of sandstone, measuring 142 ft. long, 63 ft. wide, and 30 ft. high. To the southeast, there's another temple, a square stone building with the name of Antoninus Pius over one of the entrances. On the eastern edge of the oasis, on the way to Girga, are the remnants of a large Roman fort with twelve bastions. Along the road to Assiut, there's a well-preserved Roman columbarium or dove-cote. Next to the great temple, the most interesting ruin in the oasis is the necropolis, a burial site for early Christians located on a hill 3 miles north of the town of Kharga. There are about two hundred rectangular tomb structures made of unburnt brick with decorative fronts. Most of the tombs contain a chamber where the mummy was placed, as the Egyptian Christians initially continued this method of preserving their dead. In several of the tombs and in the chapel of the cemetery, the Egyptian sign of life is painted, which was confused with the Christian cross. The chapel is basilica-style; it and another building in the necropolis feature simple frescoes depicting biblical themes.
Kharga town (pop. 1907 census, 5362) is picturesquely situated amid palm groves. The houses are of sun-dried bricks, the streets narrow and winding and for the most part roofed over, the roofs carrying upper storeys. Some of the streets are cut through the solid rock. South of the town are the villages of Genna, Guehda (with a temple dedicated to Ammon, Mut and Khonsu), Bulak (pop. 1012), Dakakin, Beris (pop. 1564), Dush (with remains of a fine temple bearing the names of Domitian and Hadrian), &c.
Kharga town (pop. 1907 census, 5,362) is beautifully located among palm groves. The houses are made of sun-dried bricks, and the streets are narrow and winding, mostly covered overhead, with roofs supporting upper floors. Some of the streets are carved from solid rock. To the south of the town are the villages of Genna, Guehda (which has a temple dedicated to Ammon, Mut, and Khonsu), Bulak (pop. 1,012), Dakakin, Beris (pop. 1,564), and Dush (which has remnants of an impressive temple with the names of Domitian and Hadrian), etc.
Kharga is usually identified with the city of Oasis mentioned by Herodotus as being seven days’ journey from Thebes and called in Greek the Island of the Blessed. The oasis was traversed by the army of Cambyses when on its way to the oasis of Ammon (Siwa), the army perishing in the desert before reaching its destination. During the Roman period, as it had also been in Pharaonic times, Kharga was used as a place of banishment, the most notable exile being Nestorius, sent thither after his condemnation by the council of Ephesus. Later it became a halting-place for the caravans of slaves brought from Darfur to Egypt.
Kharga is usually linked to the city of the Oasis mentioned by Herodotus, which is seven days' journey from Thebes and known in Greek as the Island of the Blessed. The army of Cambyses passed through the oasis on its way to the oasis of Ammon (Siwa), but the army perished in the desert before reaching its destination. During the Roman period, just as it had been in Pharaonic times, Kharga was used as a place of exile, with the most notable exile being Nestorius, who was sent there after being condemned by the council of Ephesus. Later, it became a stopover for caravans transporting slaves from Darfur to Egypt.
About 100 m. W. of Kharga is the oasis of Dakhla, the inner or receding oasis, so named in contrast to Kharga as being farther from the Nile. Dakhla has a population (1907) of 18,368. Its chief town, El Kasr, has 3602 inhabitants. The principal ruin, of Roman origin and now called Deir el Hagar (the stone convent), is of considerable size. The Theban triad were the chief deities worshipped here. Some 120 m. N.W. of Dakhla is the oasis of Farafra, population about 1000, said to be the first of the oases conquered by the Moslems from the Christians. It is noted for the fine quality of its olives. The Baharia, or Little Oasis (pop. about 6000), lies 80 m. N.N.E. of Farafra. Many of its inhabitants, who are of Berber race, are Senussites. Baharia is about 250 m. E.S.E. of the oasis of Siwa (see Egypt: The Oases; and Siwa).
About 100 miles west of Kharga is the Dakhla Oasis, known as the inner or retreating oasis, named so because it is further from the Nile compared to Kharga. As of 1907, Dakhla had a population of 18,368. Its main town, El Kasr, had 3,602 residents. The largest ruin, of Roman origin and now called Deir el Hagar (the stone convent), is quite sizable. The main deities worshipped here were part of the Theban triad. Approximately 120 miles northwest of Dakhla is the Farafra Oasis, with a population of around 1,000, said to be the first oasis overtaken by Muslims from Christians. It is known for the high quality of its olives. The Baharia, or Little Oasis (population about 6,000), is located 80 miles north-northeast of Farafra. Many of its residents, who are of Berber descent, are Senussi. Baharia is about 250 miles east-southeast of the Siwa Oasis (see Egypt: The Oases; and Siwa).
See H. Brugsch, Reise nach dem grossen Oase el-Khargeh in der Libyschen Wüste (Leipzig, 1878); H. J. L. Beadnell, An Egyptian Oasis (London, 1909); Murray’s Handbook for Egypt, 11th ed. (London, 1907); Geological and Topographical Report on Kharga Oasis (1899), on Farafra Oasis (1899), on Dakhla Oasis (1900), on Baharia Oasis (1903), all issued by the Public Works Department, Cairo.
See H. Brugsch, Journey to the Great Oasis of el-Khargeh in the Libyan Desert (Leipzig, 1878); H. J. L. Beadnell, An Egyptian Oasis (London, 1909); Murray’s Handbook for Egypt, 11th ed. (London, 1907); Geological and Topographical Report on Kharga Oasis (1899), on Farafra Oasis (1899), on Dakhla Oasis (1900), on Baharia Oasis (1903), all published by the Public Works Department, Cairo.

KHARKOV, a government of Little Russia, surrounded by those of Kursk, Poltava, Ekaterinoslav, territory of the Don Cossacks, and Voronezh, and belonging partly to the basin of the Don and partly to that of the Dnieper. The area is 21,035 sq. m. In general the government is a table-land, with an elevation of 300 to 450 ft., traversed by deep-cut river valleys. The soil is for the most part of high fertility, about 57% of the surface being arable land and 24% natural pasture; and though the winter is rather severe, the summer heat is sufficient for the ripening of grapes and melons in the open air. The bulk of the population is engaged in agricultural pursuits and the breeding of sheep, cattle and horses, though various manufacturing industries have developed rapidly, more especially since the middle of the 19th century. Horses are bred for the army, and the yield of wool is of special importance. The ordinary cereals, maize, buckwheat, millet, hemp, flax, tobacco, poppies, potatoes and beetroot are all grown, and bee-keeping and silkworm-rearing are of considerable importance. Sixty-three per cent. of the land is owned by the peasants, 25% by the nobility, 6% by owners of other classes, and 6% by the crown and public institutions. Beetroot sugar factories, cotton-mills, distilleries, flour-mills, tobacco factories, brickworks, breweries, woollen factories, iron-works, pottery-kilns and tanneries are the leading industrial establishments. Gardening is actively prosecuted. Salt is extracted at Slavyansk. The mass of the people are Little Russians, but there are also Great Russians, Kalmucks, Germans, Jews and Gypsies. In 1867 the total population was 1,681,486, and in 1897 2,507,277, of whom 1,242,892 were women and 367,602 lived in towns. The estimated population in 1906 was 2,983,900. The government is divided into eleven districts. The chief town is Kharkov (q.v.). The other district towns, with their populations in 1897, are Akhtyrka (25,965 in 1900), Bogodukhov (11,928), Izyum (12,959), Kupyansk (7256), Lebedin (16,684), Starobyelsk (13,128), Sumy (28,519 in 1900), Valki (8842), Volchansk (11,322), and Zmiyev (4652).
KHARKIV, is a region of Little Russia, bordered by Kursk, Poltava, Ekaterinoslav, the territory of the Don Cossacks, and Voronezh, partially in the Don basin and partially in the Dnieper basin. This area covers 21,035 square miles. Generally, the land is a plateau, ranging from 300 to 450 feet in elevation, with deep river valleys cutting through. The soil is mostly very fertile, with about 57% of the land being arable and 24% being natural pasture. While winters can be quite harsh, the summer heat is adequate for growing grapes and melons outdoors. Most of the population is involved in farming and raising sheep, cattle, and horses, although various manufacturing industries have also grown quickly, especially since the mid-19th century. Horses are bred for military purposes, and wool production is particularly important. Common crops include cereals, maize, buckwheat, millet, hemp, flax, tobacco, poppies, potatoes, and beets. Beekeeping and sericulture are also significant activities. Sixty-three percent of the land is owned by peasants, 25% by the nobility, 6% by other classes, and 6% by the state and public institutions. The main industries include beet sugar factories, cotton mills, distilleries, flour mills, tobacco factories, brickworks, breweries, woolen factories, ironworks, pottery production, and tanneries. Gardening is actively pursued, and salt is extracted in Slavyansk. The majority of the population consists of Little Russians, but there are also Great Russians, Kalmucks, Germans, Jews, and Gypsies. In 1867, the total population was 1,681,486, and by 1897 it had risen to 2,507,277, of which 1,242,892 were women and 367,602 lived in urban areas. The estimated population in 1906 was 2,983,900. The region is split into eleven districts. The main city is Kharkov (q.v.). Other district towns, along with their populations in 1897, include Akhtyrka (25,965 in 1900), Bogodukhov (11,928), Izyum (12,959), Kupyansk (7,256), Lebedin (16,684), Starobyelsk (13,128), Sumy (28,519 in 1900), Valki (8,842), Volchansk (11,322), and Zmiyev (4,652).

KHARKOV, a town of southern Russia, capital of the above government, in 56° 37′ N. and 25° 5′ E., in the valley of the Donets, 152 m. by rail S.S.E. of Kursk. Oak forests bound it on two sides. Pop. (1867), 59,968; (1900), 197,405. Kharkov is an archiepiscopal see of the Orthodox Greek Church, and the headquarters of the X. army corps. The four annual fairs are among the busiest in Russia, more especially the Kreshchenskaya or Epiphany fair, which is opened on the 6th (19th) of January, and the Pokrovsky fair in the autumn. The turnover at the former is estimated at £3,000,000 to £4,000,000. Thousands of horses are bought and sold. At the Trinity (Troitsa) fair in June an extensive business (£800,000) is done in wool. A great variety of manufactured goods are produced in the town—linen, felt, beetroot sugar, tobacco, brandy, soap, candles, cast-iron. Kharkov is an educational centre for the higher and middle classes. Besides a flourishing university, instituted in 1805, and attended by from 1600 to 1700 students, it possesses a technological institute (400 students), a railway engineering school, an observatory, a veterinary college, a botanical garden, a theological seminary, and a commercial school. The university building was formerly a royal palace. The library contains 170,000 volumes; and the zoological collections are especially rich in the birds and fishes of southern Russia. Public gardens occupy the site of the ancient military works; and the government has a model farm in the neighbourhood. Of the Orthodox churches one has the rank of cathedral (1781). Among the public institutions are a people’s palace (1903) and an industrial museum.
KHARKIV, is a town in southern Russia, serving as the capital of the mentioned government, located at 56° 37′ N. and 25° 5′ E., in the Donets valley, 152 km by rail S.S.E. of Kursk. It is surrounded by oak forests on two sides. The population was 59,968 in 1867 and 197,405 in 1900. Kharkov is the archiepiscopal see of the Orthodox Greek Church and the headquarters of the X. army corps. It hosts four annual fairs, which are among the busiest in Russia, especially the Kreshchenskaya or Epiphany fair that starts on January 6 (19), and the Pokrovsky fair in the fall. The turnover at the Epiphany fair is estimated between £3,000,000 and £4,000,000, with thousands of horses traded. The Trinity (Troitsa) fair in June deals extensively in wool, with a business volume of £800,000. The town produces a wide range of manufactured goods, including linen, felt, beetroot sugar, tobacco, brandy, soap, candles, and cast iron. Kharkov is a hub for higher and middle education. Along with a thriving university established in 1805, which has between 1,600 and 1,700 students, it also has a technological institute (400 students), a railway engineering school, an observatory, a veterinary college, a botanical garden, a theological seminary, and a commercial school. The university building was once a royal palace. The library has 170,000 volumes, and the zoological collections are particularly rich in the birds and fishes of southern Russia. Public gardens now occupy the site of the old military fortifications, while the government maintains a model farm nearby. One of the Orthodox churches holds cathedral status (1781). Among the public institutions are a people’s palace (1903) and an industrial museum.
The foundation of Kharkov is assigned to 1650, but there is archaeological evidence of a much earlier occupation of the district, if not of the site. The Cossacks of Kharkov remained faithful to the tsar during the rebellions of the latter part of the 17th century; in return they received numerous privileges, and continued to be a strong advance-guard of the Russian power, till the final subjugation of all the southern region. With other military settlements Kharkov was placed on a new footing in 1765; and at the same time it became the administrative centre of the Ukraine.
The founding of Kharkov is dated to 1650, but there’s archaeological evidence that the area was occupied much earlier, if not the exact site itself. The Cossacks of Kharkov remained loyal to the tsar during the rebellions of the late 17th century; in return, they received various privileges and continued to serve as a strong front line for Russian power until the complete domination of the entire southern region. Along with other military settlements, Kharkov was restructured in 1765, and it also became the administrative center of Ukraine at that time.

KHARPUT, the most important town in the Kharput (or Mamuret el-Aziz) vilayet of Asia Minor, situated at an altitude of 4350 ft., a few miles south of the Murad Su or Eastern Euphrates, and almost as near the source of the Tigris, on the Samsun-Sivas-Diarbekr road. Pop. about 20,000. The town is built on a hill terrace about 1000 ft. above a well-watered plain of exceptional fertility which lies to the south and supports a large population. Kharput probably stands on or near the site of Carcathiocerta in Sophene, reached by Corbulo in A.D. 65. The early Moslem geographers knew it as Hisn Ziyad, but the Armenian name was Khartabirt or Kharbirt, whence Kharput. Cedrenus (11th century) writes Χάρποτε. There is a story that in 1122 773 Joscelin (Jocelyn) of Courtenay, and Baldwin II., king of Jerusalem, both prisoners of the Amir Balak in its castle, were murdered by being cast from its cliffs after an attempted rescue. The story is told by William of Tyre, who calls the place Quart Piert or Pierre, but it is a mere romance. Kharput is an important station of the American missionaries, who have built a college, a theological seminary, and boys’ and girls’ schools. In November 1895 Kurds looted and burned the Armenian villages on the plain; and in the same month Kharput was attacked and the American schools were burned down. A large number of the Gregorian and Protestant Armenian clergy and people were massacred, and churches, monasteries and houses were looted. The vilayet Kharput was founded in 1888, being the result of a provincial rearrangement, designed to ensure better control over the disturbed districts of Kurdistan. It has much mineral wealth, a healthy climate and a fertile soil. The seat of government is Mezere, on the plain 3 m. S. of Kharput.
KHARPUT, is the most significant town in the Kharput (or Mamuret el-Aziz) province of Asia Minor, located at an elevation of 4,350 ft., just a few miles south of the Murad Su or Eastern Euphrates River, and almost as close to the source of the Tigris, along the Samsun-Sivas-Diarbekr road. The population is around 20,000. The town is built on a hillside about 1,000 ft. above a well-watered plain with exceptional fertility to the south, which supports a large population. Kharput likely sits on or near the location of Carcathiocerta in Sophene, reached by Corbulo in CE 65. Early Muslim geographers referred to it as Hisn Ziyad, but the Armenian name was Khartabirt or Kharbirt, which became Kharput. Cedrenus (11th century) wrote Χάρποτ. There’s a tale that in 1122 773, Joscelin (Jocelyn) of Courtenay and Baldwin II, king of Jerusalem, who were both prisoners of Amir Balak in its castle, were murdered by being thrown off its cliffs after an attempted rescue. This story is recounted by William of Tyre, who calls the place Quart Piert or Pierre, although it is merely a romance. Kharput is a key location for American missionaries, who have established a college, a theological seminary, and schools for both boys and girls. In November 1895, Kurds looted and burned Armenian villages in the plain; Kharput itself was attacked, leading to the destruction of the American schools. Many Gregorian and Protestant Armenian clergy and civilians were massacred, and churches, monasteries, and homes were looted. The Kharput province was created in 1888 as part of a provincial reorganization aimed at ensuring better control over the troubled districts of Kurdistan. It possesses significant mineral resources, a healthy climate, and fertile soil. The seat of government is Mezere, located 3 miles south of Kharput.

KHARSAWAN, a feudatory state of India, within the Chota Nagpur division of Bengal; area 153 sq. m.; pop. (1901), 36,540; estimated revenue £2600. Since the opening of the main line of the Bengal-Nagpur railway through the state trade has been stimulated, and it is believed that both iron and copper can be worked profitably.
KHARSAWAN, is a princely state in India, located in the Chota Nagpur division of Bengal; it covers an area of 153 square miles and had a population of 36,540 in 1901, with an estimated revenue of £2600. Since the main line of the Bengal-Nagpur railway opened through the state, trade has increased, and it’s thought that both iron and copper can be extracted profitably.

KHARTUM, the capital of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, on the left bank of the Blue Nile immediately above its junction with the White Nile in 15° 36′ N., 32° 32′ E., and 1252 ft. above the sea. It is 432 m. by rail S.W. of Port Sudan, on the Red Sea, and 1345 m. S. of Cairo by rail and steamer. Pop. (1907) with suburbs, but excluding Omdurman, 69,349.
KHARTOUM, is the capital of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, located on the left bank of the Blue Nile just above where it meets the White Nile at 15° 36′ N., 32° 32′ E., and 1252 ft. above sea level. It is 432 km by rail southwest of Port Sudan on the Red Sea and 1345 km south of Cairo by rail and steamer. The population in 1907, including suburbs but excluding Omdurman, was 69,349.
The city, laid out on a plan drawn up by Lord Kitchener in 1898, has a picturesque aspect with its numerous handsome stone and brick buildings surrounded by gardens and its groves of palms and other trees. The river esplanade, 2 m. long, contains the chief buildings. Parallel with it is Khedive Avenue, of equal length. The rest of the city is in squares, the streets forming the design of the union jack. In the centre of the esplanade is the governor-general’s palace, occupying the site of the palace destroyed by the Mahdists in 1885. It is a three-storeyed building with arcaded verandas and a fine staircase leading to a loggia on the first floor. Here a tablet indicates the spot in the old palace where General Gordon fell. In the gardens, which cover six acres, is a colossal stone “lamb” brought from the ruins of Soba, an ancient Christian city on the Blue Nile. The “lamb” is in reality a ram of Ammon, and has an inscription in Ethiopian hieroglyphs. In front of the southern façade, which looks on to Khedive Avenue, is a bronze statue of General Gordon seated on a camel, a copy of the statue by Onslow Ford at Chatham, England. Government offices and private villas are on either side of the palace, and beyond, on the east, are the Sudan Club, the military hospital, and the Gordon Memorial College. The college, the chief educational centre in the Sudan, is a large, many-windowed building with accommodation for several hundred scholars and research laboratories and an economic museum. At the western end of the esplanade are the zoological gardens, the chief hotel, the Coptic church and the Mudiria House (residence of the governor of Khartum). Running south from Khedive Avenue at the spot where the Gordon statue stands, is Victoria Avenue, leading to Abbas Square, in the centre of which is the great mosque with two minarets. On the north-east side of the square are the public markets. The Anglican church, dedicated to All Saints, the principal banks and business houses, are in Khedive Avenue. There are Maronite and Greek churches, an Austrian Roman Catholic mission, a large and well-equipped civil hospital and a museum for Sudan archaeology. Outside the city are a number of model villages (each of the principal tribes of the Sudan having its own settlement) in which the dwellings are built after the tribal fashion. Adjacent are the parade ground and racecourse and the golf-links. A line of fortifications extends south of the city from the Blue to the White Nile. The buildings are used as barracks. Barracks for British troops occupy the end of the line facing the Blue Nile.
The city, designed based on a plan by Lord Kitchener in 1898, has a charming appearance with its many attractive stone and brick buildings surrounded by gardens and groves of palm and other trees. The riverfront promenade, 2 miles long, features the main buildings. Next to it is Khedive Avenue, which is the same length. The rest of the city is organized in squares, with the streets forming the design of the Union Jack. In the center of the promenade is the governor-general’s palace, built on the site of the palace destroyed by the Mahdists in 1885. It’s a three-story building with arcaded verandas and a beautiful staircase leading to a loggia on the first floor. Here, a plaque marks the spot in the old palace where General Gordon fell. In the gardens, which cover six acres, is a massive stone “lamb” brought from the ruins of Soba, an ancient Christian city on the Blue Nile. The “lamb” is actually a ram of Ammon, and it has an inscription in Ethiopian hieroglyphs. In front of the southern side, which faces Khedive Avenue, is a bronze statue of General Gordon sitting on a camel, a replica of the statue by Onslow Ford in Chatham, England. Government offices and private villas are located on either side of the palace, and further east are the Sudan Club, the military hospital, and the Gordon Memorial College. The college, the main educational center in the Sudan, is a large building with many windows, housing several hundred scholars, research laboratories, and an economic museum. At the western end of the promenade are the zoological gardens, the main hotel, the Coptic church, and the Mudiria House (the residence of the governor of Khartum). Running south from Khedive Avenue at the point where the Gordon statue stands is Victoria Avenue, leading to Abbas Square, which features a great mosque with two minarets in its center. On the northeast side of the square are the public markets. The Anglican church, dedicated to All Saints, the main banks, and business establishments are all located on Khedive Avenue. There are also Maronite and Greek churches, an Austrian Roman Catholic mission, a large and well-equipped civil hospital, and a museum dedicated to Sudanese archaeology. Outside the city are several model villages, each representing the main tribes of the Sudan, where the homes are built in the traditional tribal style. Nearby are the parade ground, racecourse, and golf course. A line of fortifications stretches south of the city from the Blue Nile to the White Nile. The buildings serve as barracks, with specific barracks for British troops at the end of the line facing the Blue Nile.
On the right (northern) bank of the Blue Nile is the suburb of Khartum North, formerly called Halfaya,1 where is the principal railway station. It is joined to the city by a bridge (completed 1910) containing a roadway and the railway, Khartum itself being served by steam trams and rickshaws. The steamers for the White and the Blue Nile start from the quay along the esplanade. West of the zoological gardens is the point of junction of the Blue and White Niles and here is a ferry across to Omdurman (q.v.) on the west bank of the White Nile a mile or two below Khartum. In the river immediately below Khartum is Tuti Island, on which is an old fort and an Arab village.
On the northern bank of the Blue Nile is the suburb of Khartum North, formerly known as Halfaya, where the main railway station is located. It connects to the city via a bridge (finished in 1910) that has both a road and a railway. Khartum itself is served by steam trams and rickshaws. Steamers for the White and Blue Niles depart from the dock along the esplanade. West of the zoo is the junction of the Blue and White Niles, where there is a ferry crossing to Omdurman (see entry) on the west bank of the White Nile, a mile or two downstream from Khartum. Just below Khartum in the river is Tuti Island, which has an old fort and an Arab village.
From its geographical position Khartum is admirably adapted as a commercial and political centre. It is the great entrepôt for the trade of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. By the Nile waterways there is easy transport from the southern and western equatorial provinces and from Sennar and other eastern districts. Through Omdurman come the exports of Kordofan and Darfur, while by the Red Sea railway there is ready access to the markets of the world. The only important manufacture is the making of bricks.
From its geographical location, Khartoum is perfectly suited as a commercial and political hub. It serves as the main distribution center for trade in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. The Nile waterways allow for easy transportation from the southern and western equatorial provinces, as well as from Sennar and other eastern areas. Exports from Kordofan and Darfur pass through Omdurman, while the Red Sea railway provides direct access to global markets. The only significant industry here is brick making.
The population is heterogeneous. The official class is composed chiefly of British and Egyptians; the traders are mostly Greeks, Syrians and Copts, while nearly all the tribes of the Sudan are represented in the negro and Arab inhabitants.
The population is diverse. The official class is mainly made up of British and Egyptians; the traders are mostly Greeks, Syrians, and Copts, while nearly all the tribes from Sudan are represented among the Black and Arab residents.
At the time of the occupation of the Sudan by the Egyptians a small fishing village existed on the site of the present city. In 1822 the Egyptians established a permanent camp here and out of this grew the city, which in 1830 was chosen as the capital of the Sudanese possessions of Egypt. It got its name from the resemblance of the promontory at the confluence of the two Niles to an elephant’s trunk, the meaning of khartum in the dialect of Arabic spoken in the locality. The city rapidly acquired importance as the Sudan was opened up by travellers and traders, becoming, besides the seat of much legitimate commerce, a great slave mart. It was chosen as the headquarters of Protestant and Roman Catholic missions, and had a population of 50,000 or more. Despite its size it contained few buildings of any architectural merit; the most important were the palace of the governor-general and the church of the Austrian mission. The history of the city is intimately bound up with that of the Sudan generally, but it may be recalled here that in 1884, at the time of the Mahdist rising, General Gordon was sent to Khartum to arrange for the evacuation by the Egyptians of the Sudan. At Khartum he was besieged by the Mahdists, whose headquarters were at Omdurman. Khartum was captured and Gordon killed on the 26th of January 1885, two days before the arrival off the town of a small British relief force, which withdrew on seeing the city in the hands of the enemy. Nearly every building in Khartum was destroyed by the Mahdists and the city abandoned in favour of Omdurman, which place remained the headquarters of the mahdi’s successor, the khalifa Abdullah, till September 1898, when it was taken by the Anglo-Egyptian forces under General (afterwards Lord) Kitchener, and the seat of government again transferred to Khartum. It speedily arose from its ruins, being rebuilt on a much finer scale than the original city. In 1899 the railway from Wadi Haifa was completed to Khartum, and in 1906 through communication by rail was established with the Red Sea.
At the time the Egyptians occupied Sudan, there was a small fishing village where the current city stands. In 1822, the Egyptians set up a permanent camp here, which eventually developed into a city. By 1830, it was designated as the capital of Egypt's Sudanese territories. The city got its name because the promontory at the confluence of the two Niles looked like an elephant's trunk, which is what khartum means in the local Arabic dialect. The city quickly became important as Sudan was explored by travelers and traders, evolving into a hub for legitimate trade as well as a major slave market. It became the base for Protestant and Roman Catholic missions and had a population of over 50,000. Despite its size, there were few architecturally notable buildings; the most significant were the governor-general's palace and the church of the Austrian mission. The history of the city is closely tied to that of Sudan as a whole, but it's worth mentioning that in 1884, during the Mahdist uprising, General Gordon was sent to Khartum to organize the evacuation of Sudan by the Egyptians. While in Khartum, he was besieged by the Mahdists, whose base was in Omdurman. Khartum fell and Gordon was killed on January 26, 1885, just two days before a small British relief force arrived at the city and retreated upon seeing it occupied by the enemy. Nearly every building in Khartum was destroyed by the Mahdists, and the city was abandoned in favor of Omdurman, which became the headquarters for the Mahdi's successor, Khalifa Abdullah, until September 1898, when it was captured by Anglo-Egyptian forces under General Kitchener, who later became Lord Kitchener, and the government was moved back to Khartum. The city quickly rose from its ruins, rebuilt on a much larger scale than before. In 1899, the railway from Wadi Haifa was completed to Khartum, and in 1906, rail communication with the Red Sea was established.
1 The village of Halfaya, a place of some importance before the foundation of Khartum, is 4 m. to the N., on the eastern bank of the Nile. From the 15th century up to 1821 it was the capital of a small state, tributary to Sennar, regarded as a continuation of the Christian kingdom of Aloa (see Dongola).
1 The village of Halfaya, which was quite important before Khartum was established, is located 4 miles to the north, on the eastern bank of the Nile. From the 15th century until 1821, it served as the capital of a small state that paid tribute to Sennar and was seen as a continuation of the Christian kingdom of Aloa (see Dongola).

KHASI AND JAINTIA HILLS, a district of British India, in the Hills division of Eastern Bengal and Assam. It occupies the central plateau between the valleys of the Brahmaputra and the Surma. Area, 6027 sq. m.; pop. (1901), 202,250, showing an increase of 2% in the decade.
KHASI AND JAINTIA HILLS, is a district from the time of British India, located in the Hills division of Eastern Bengal and Assam. It sits on the central plateau between the valleys of the Brahmaputra and the Surma. The area is 6027 square miles, with a population of 202,250 in 1901, reflecting a 2% increase over the decade.
The district consists of a succession of steep ridges running east and west, with elevated table-lands between. On the southern side, towards Sylhet, the mountains rise precipitously from the valley of the Bārāk or Surma. The first plateau is about 4000 ft. above sea-level. Farther north is another plateau, on which is situated the station of Shillong, 4900 ft. above the sea; behind lies the Shillong range, of which the highest peak rises to 6450 ft. On the north side, towards Kamrūp, are two similar plateaus of lower elevation. The 774 general appearance of all these table-lands is that of undulating downs, covered with grass, but destitute of large timber. At 3000 ft. elevation the indigenous pine predominates over all other vegetation, and forms almost pure pine forests. The highest ridges are clothed with magnificent clumps of timber trees, which superstition has preserved from the axe of the wood-cutter. The characteristic trees in these sacred groves chiefly consist of oaks, chestnuts, magnolias, &c. Beneath the shade grow rare orchids, rhododendrons and wild cinnamon. The streams are merely mountain torrents; many of them pass through narrow gorges of wild beauty. From time immemorial, Lower Bengal has drawn its supply of lime from the Khasi Hills, and the quarries along their southern slope are inexhaustible. Coal of fair quality crops out at several places, and there are a few small coal-mines.
The district is made up of a series of steep ridges running east and west, with high plateaus in between. On the southern side, towards Sylhet, the mountains rise sharply from the valley of the Bārāk or Surma. The first plateau is about 4,000 feet above sea level. Further north is another plateau where the station of Shillong sits at 4,900 feet above sea level; behind it lies the Shillong range, with its highest peak reaching 6,450 feet. On the northern side, towards Kamrūp, there are two similar plateaus at lower elevations. The 774 overall look of these plateaus is that of rolling hills covered in grass, but lacking large trees. At 3,000 feet elevation, native pine trees dominate over all other plants, creating almost pure pine forests. The highest ridges are adorned with impressive clusters of timber trees, which superstition has kept safe from loggers. The typical trees in these sacred groves mainly include oaks, chestnuts, magnolias, etc. Under the shade grow rare orchids, rhododendrons, and wild cinnamon. The streams are simply mountain torrents; many of them flow through narrow, stunning gorges. For ages, Lower Bengal has relied on the Khasi Hills for its lime supply, and the quarries along their southern slope are endless. Coal of decent quality appears in several spots, and there are a few small coal mines.
The Khasi Hills were conquered by the British in 1833. They are inhabited by a tribe of the same name, who still live in primitive communities under elective chiefs in political subordination to the British government. There are 25 of these chiefs called Siems, who exercise independent jurisdiction and pay no tribute. According to the census of 1901 the Khasis numbered 107,500. They are a peculiar race, speaking a language that belongs to the Mon-Anam family, following the rule of matriarchal succession, and erecting monolithic monuments over their dead. The Jaintia Hills used to form a petty Hindu principality which was annexed in 1835. The inhabitants, called Syntengs, a cognate tribe to the Khasis, were subjected to a moderate income tax, an innovation against which they rebelled in 1860 and 1862. The revolt was stamped out by the Khasi and Jaintia Expedition of 1862-63. The headquarters of the district were transferred in 1864 from Cherrapunji to Shillong, which was afterwards made the capital of the province of Assam. A good cart-road runs north from Cherrapunji through Shillong to Gauhati on the Brahmaputra; total length, 97 m. The district was the focus of the great earthquake of the 12th of June 1897, which not only destroyed every permanent building, but broke up the roads and caused many landslips. The loss of life was put at only 916, but hundreds died subsequently of a malignant fever. In 1901 the district had 17,321 Christians, chiefly converts of the Welsh Calvinistic Mission.
The Khasi Hills were taken over by the British in 1833. They are home to a tribe with the same name, who still live in traditional communities led by elected chiefs, all under British rule. There are 25 of these chiefs known as Siems, who have their own authority and don’t pay taxes. According to the 1901 census, the Khasis numbered 107,500. They are a unique group, speaking a language from the Mon-Anam family, practicing matriarchal succession, and building monolithic monuments for their deceased. The Jaintia Hills used to be a minor Hindu principality, annexed in 1835. The people, known as Syntengs, who are related to the Khasis, were subjected to a modest income tax, which led them to revolt in 1860 and 1862. The uprising was suppressed by the Khasi and Jaintia Expedition of 1862-63. In 1864, the district headquarters moved from Cherrapunji to Shillong, which later became the capital of Assam province. A well-maintained cart road runs north from Cherrapunji through Shillong to Gauhati on the Brahmaputra, with a total length of 97 miles. The district was the epicenter of the significant earthquake on June 12, 1897, which not only destroyed all permanent buildings but also damaged roads and caused numerous landslides. The death toll was reported at 916, but many more died later from a severe fever. By 1901, the district had 17,321 Christians, mostly converts from the Welsh Calvinistic Mission.
See District Gazetteer (1906); Major P. R. T. Gurdon, The Khasis (1907).
See District Gazetteer (1906); Major P. R. T. Gurdon, The Khasis (1907).

KHASKOY (also Chaskoi, Haskoi, Khaskioi, Chaskovo, Haskovo, and in Bulgarian Khaskovo), the capital of the department of Khaskoy in the eastern Rumelia, Bulgaria; 45 m. E.S.E. of Philippopolis. Pop. (1900), 14,928. The town has a station 7 m. N. on the Philippopolis-Adrianople section of the Belgrade-Constantinople railway. Carpets and woollen goods are manufactured, and in the surrounding country tobacco and silk are produced.
KHASKOY (also Chaskoi, Haskoi, Khaskioi, Chaskovo, Haskovo, and in Bulgarian Khaskovo), is the capital of the Khaskoy department in eastern Rumelia, Bulgaria; located 45 miles E.S.E. of Philippopolis. Population (1900) was 14,928. The town has a station 7 miles north on the Philippopolis-Adrianople section of the Belgrade-Constantinople railway. It produces carpets and woolen goods, and the surrounding area grows tobacco and silk.

KHATTAK, an important Pathan tribe in the North-West Frontier Province of India, inhabiting the south-eastern portion of the Peshawar district and the south-eastern and eastern portions of Kohat. They number 24,000, and have always been quiet and loyal subjects of the British government. They furnish many recruits to the Indian army, and make most excellent soldiers.
KHATTAK, is a significant Pathan tribe located in the North-West Frontier Province of India, residing in the southeastern part of the Peshawar district as well as the southeastern and eastern areas of Kohat. Their population is around 24,000, and they have consistently been loyal and peaceful subjects of the British government. They provide numerous recruits for the Indian army and are known to be outstanding soldiers.

KHAZARS (known also as Chozars, as Ἀκάζιροι or Χάζαροι in Byzantine writers, as Khazirs in Armenian and Khwalisses in Russian chronicles, and Ugri Bielii in Nestor), an ancient people who occupied a prominent place amongst the secondary powers of the Byzantine state-system. In the epic of Firdousi Khazar is the representative name for all the northern foes of Persia, and legendary invasions long before the Christian era are vaguely attributed to them. But the Khazars are an historic figure upon the borderland of Europe and Asia for at least 900 years (A.D. 190-1100). The epoch of their greatness is from A.D. 600 to 950. Their home was in the spurs of the Caucasus and along the shores of the Caspian—called by medieval Moslem geographers Bahr-al-Khazar (“sea of the Khazars”); their cities, all populous and civilized commercial centres, were Itil, the capital, upon the delta of the Volga, the “river of the Khazars,” Semender (Tarkhu), the older capital, Khamlidje or Khalendsch, Belendscher, the outpost towards Armenia, and Sarkel on the Don. They were the Venetians of the Caspian and the Euxine, the organizers of the transit between the two basins, the universal carriers between East and West; and Itil was the meeting-place of the commerce of Persia, Byzantium, Armenia, Russia and the Bulgarians of the middle Volga. The tide of their dominion ebbed and flowed repeatedly, but the normal Khazari may be taken as the territory between the Caucasus, the Volga and the Don, with the outlying province of the Crimea, or Little Khazaria. The southern boundary never greatly altered; it did at times reach the Kur and the Aras, but on that side the Khazars were confronted by Byzantium and Persia, and were for the most part restrained within the passes of the Caucasus by the fortifications of Dariel. Amongst the nomadic Ugrians and agricultural Slavs of the north their frontier fluctuated widely, and in its zenith Khazaria extended from the Dnieper to Bolgari upon the middle Volga, and along the eastern shore of the Caspian to Astarabad.
KHAZARS (also known as Chozars, as Akasirōi or Khazars by Byzantine writers, as Khazirs in Armenian and Khwalisses in Russian chronicles, and Ugri Bielii in Nestor), were an ancient people who held a significant position among the secondary powers of the Byzantine state-system. In Firdousi's epic, Khazar represents all the northern enemies of Persia, with legendary invasions attributed to them long before the Christian era. The Khazars are a historical figure located on the border between Europe and Asia for at least 900 years (A.D. 190-1100). Their peak era lasted from A.D. 600 to 950. Their homeland was in the foothills of the Caucasus and along the shores of the Caspian—referred to by medieval Muslim geographers as Bahr-al-Khazar (“sea of the Khazars”); their cities, all thriving and cultured commercial centers, included Itil, the capital at the delta of the Volga, the “river of the Khazars”; Semender (Tarkhu), the older capital; Khamlidje or Khalendsch; Belendscher, the outpost towards Armenia; and Sarkel on the Don. They were like the Venetians of the Caspian and the Euxine, facilitating trade between the two regions, serving as the carriers between East and West; and Itil was the hub of commerce for Persia, Byzantium, Armenia, Russia, and the Bulgarians of the middle Volga. Their influence waxed and waned repeatedly, but the typical territory of Khazaria can be considered the area between the Caucasus, the Volga, and the Don, including the outlying region of Crimea, or Little Khazaria. The southern border remained relatively stable; it sometimes reached the Kur and Aras rivers, but on that side, the Khazars faced Byzantium and Persia, often being held back within the Caucasus passes by the fortifications of Dariel. Among the nomadic Ugrians and agricultural Slavs to the north, their borders varied widely, and at its height, Khazaria extended from the Dnieper to Bolgari on the middle Volga, and along the eastern coast of the Caspian to Astarabad.
Ethnology.—The origin of the Khazars has been much disputed, and they have been variously regarded as akin to the Georgians, Finno-Ugrians and Turks. This last view is perhaps the most probable. Their king Joseph, in answer to the inquiry of Ḥasdai Ibn Shaprūt of Cordova (c. 958), stated that his people sprang from Thogarmah, grandson of Japhet, and the supposed ancestor of the other peoples of the Caucasus. The Arab geographers who knew the Khazars best connect them either with the Georgians (Ibn Athīr) or with the Armenians (Dimishqi, ed. Mehren, p. 263); whilst Aḥmad ibn Faḍlān, who passed through Khazaria on a mission from the caliph Moqtaḍir (A.D. 921), positively asserts that the Khazar tongue differed not only from the Turkish, but from that of the bordering nations, which were Ugrian.
Ethnology.—The origin of the Khazars has been widely debated, and they have been variously seen as related to the Georgians, Finno-Ugrians, and Turks. The last perspective is probably the most accurate. Their king Joseph, when asked by Ḥasdai Ibn Shaprūt of Cordova (c. 958), stated that his people descended from Thogarmah, the grandson of Japhet, who is believed to be the ancestor of the other peoples in the Caucasus. The Arab geographers who were most familiar with the Khazars link them either to the Georgians (Ibn Athīr) or to the Armenians (Dimishqi, ed. Mehren, p. 263); meanwhile, Aḥmad ibn Faḍlān, who traveled through Khazaria on a mission from the caliph Moqtaḍir (CE 921), clearly states that the Khazar language was different not only from Turkish but also from that of the neighboring Ugrian nations.
Nevertheless there are many points connected with the Khazars which indicate a close connexion with Ugrian or Turkish peoples. The official titles recorded by Ibn Faḍlān are those in use amongst the Tatar nations of that age, whether Huns, Bulgarians, Turks or Mongols. The names of their cities can be explained only by reference to Turkish or Ugrian dialects (Klaproth, Mém. sur les Khazars; Howorth, Khazars). Some too amongst the medieval authorities (Ibn Ḥauqal and Iṣṭakhri) note a resemblance between the speech in use amongst the Khazars and the Bulgarians; and the modern Magyar—a Ugrian language—can be traced back to a tribe which in the 9th century formed part of the Khazar kingdom. These characteristics, however, are accounted for by the fact that the Khazars were at one time subject to the Huns (A.D. 448 et seq.), at another to the Turks (c. 580), which would sufficiently explain the signs of Tatar influence in their polity, and also by the testimony of all observers, Greeks, Arabs and Russians, that there was a double strain within the Khazar nation. There were Khazars and Kara (black) Khazars. The Khazars were fair-skinned, black-haired and of a remarkable beauty and stature; their women indeed were sought as wives equally at Byzantium and Bagdad; while the Kara Khazars were ugly, short, and were reported by the Arabs almost as dark as Indians. The latter were indubitably the Ugrian nomads of the steppe, akin to the Tatar invaders of Europe, who filled the armies and convoyed the caravans of the ruling caste. But the Khazars proper were a civic commercial people, the founders of cities, remarkable for somewhat elaborate political institutions, for persistence and for good faith—all qualities foreign to the Hunnic character.
Nevertheless, there are many aspects related to the Khazars that show a close connection with Ugrian or Turkish peoples. The official titles recorded by Ibn Faḍlān were in use among the Tatar nations of that time, whether Huns, Bulgarians, Turks, or Mongols. The names of their cities can only be understood through Turkish or Ugrian dialects (Klaproth, Mém. sur les Khazars; Howorth, Khazars). Some medieval authors (Ibn Ḥauqal and Iṣṭakhri) also noted a similarity between the language spoken by the Khazars and that of the Bulgarians; the modern Magyar—a Ugrian language—can be traced back to a tribe that was part of the Khazar kingdom in the 9th century. However, these characteristics can be explained by the fact that the Khazars were once under the rule of the Huns (CE 448 et seq.) and later under the Turks (c. 580), which sufficiently accounts for the signs of Tatar influence in their governance. Furthermore, observers from Greece, Arabia, and Russia noted that the Khazar nation had a dual composition. There were Khazars and Kara (black) Khazars. The Khazars had fair skin, black hair, and striking beauty and stature; their women were sought after as wives in both Byzantium and Baghdad. In contrast, the Kara Khazars were described as unattractive, short, and were reported by Arabs to be nearly as dark as Indians. The latter were undoubtedly the Ugrian nomads of the steppe, similar to the Tatar invaders of Europe, who made up the armies and escorted the ruling class's caravans. But the true Khazars were a civic, commercial people, the founders of cities, known for their relatively sophisticated political institutions, perseverance, and integrity—all traits that are foreign to the Hunnic nature.
They have been identified with the Ἀκάτζιροι (perhaps Ak-Khazari, or White Khazars) who appear upon the lower Volga in the Byzantine annals, and thence they have been deduced, though with less convincing proof, either from the Ἀγάθυρσοι (Agathyrsi) or the Κατίαροι of Herodotus, iv. 104. There was throughout historic times a close connexion which eventually amounted to political identity between the Khazars and the Barsileens (the Passils of Moses of Chorene) who occupied the delta of the Volga; and the Barsileens can be traced through the pages of Ptolemy (Geog. v. 9), of Pliny (iv. 26), of Strabo (vii. 306), and of Pomponius Mela (ii. c. 1, p. 119) to the so-called Royal Scyths, Σκύθαι βασιλῆες, who were known to the Greek colonies upon the Euxine, and whose political superiority and commercial enterprise led to this rendering of their name. Such points, however, need not here be further pursued than to establish the presence of this white race around the Caspian and the Euxine throughout historic times. They appear in European history as White Huns (Ephthalites), White Ugrians (Sar-ogours), White Bulgarians. Owing to climatic causes the tract they occupied was slowly drying up. They were the outposts of civilization towards the encroaching desert, and the Tatar nomadism that advanced with it. They held in precarious subjection the hordes whom the conditions of the climate and the soil made it impossible to supplant. They bore the brunt of each of the great waves of Tatar conquests, and were eventually overwhelmed.
They have been identified with the Akanjiro (possibly Ak-Khazari or White Khazars) who show up in the Byzantine records along the lower Volga. Although there’s less convincing evidence, they have also been linked to either the Agathyrsii (Agathyrsi) or the Κατίαροι mentioned by Herodotus, iv. 104. Throughout history, there was a close connection that eventually became a political identity between the Khazars and the Barsileens (the Passils of Moses of Chorene) who lived in the Volga delta. The Barsileens can be traced through the works of Ptolemy (Geog. v. 9), Pliny (iv. 26), Strabo (vii. 306), and Pomponius Mela (ii. c. 1, p. 119) back to the so-called Royal Scyths, Scythian kings, who were known to the Greek colonies along the Euxine. Their political influence and commercial ventures led to their name being recorded in this way. However, we don't need to delve deeper into these points aside from establishing the presence of this white race around the Caspian and the Euxine throughout history. They show up in European history as the White Huns (Ephthalites), White Ugrians (Sar-ogours), and White Bulgarians. Due to climate changes, the area they occupied was gradually drying up. They served as the front line of civilization against the encroaching desert and the advancing Tatar nomadism. They maintained a fragile control over the groups that the climate and soil made it impossible to replace. They faced the full impact of each major wave of Tatar conquests and were ultimately overwhelmed.
History.—Amidst this white race of the steppe the Khazars can be first historically distinguished at the end of the 2nd century A.D. They burst into Armenia with the Barsileens, A.D. 198. They were repulsed and attacked in turn. The pressure of the nomads of the steppe, the quest of plunder or revenge, these seem the only motives of these early expeditions; but in the long struggle between the Roman and Persian empires, of which Armenia was often the battlefield, and eventually the prize, the attitude of the Khazars assumed political importance. Armenia inclined to the civilization and ere long to the Christianity of Rome, whilst her Arsacid princes maintained an inveterate feud with the Sassanids of Persia. It became therefore the policy of the Persian kings to call in the Khazars in every collision with the empire (200-350). During the 4th century however, the growing power of Persia culminated in the annexation of eastern Armenia. The Khazars, endangered by so powerful a neighbour, passed from under Persian influence into that remote alliance with Byzantium which thenceforth characterized their policy, and they aided Julian in his invasion of Persia (363). Simultaneously with the approach of Persia to the Caucasus the terrible empire of the Huns sprang up among the Ugrians of the northern steppes. The Khazars, straitened on every side, remained passive till the danger culminated in the accession of Attila (434). The emperor Theodosius sent envoys to bribe the Khazars (Ἀκάτζιροι) to divert the Huns from the empire by an attack upon their flank. But there was a Hunnic party amongst the Khazar chiefs. The design was betrayed to Attila; and he extinguished the independence of the nation in a moment. Khazaria became the apanage of his eldest son, and the centre of government amongst the eastern subjects of the Hun (448). Even the iron rule of Attila was preferable to the time of anarchy that succeeded it. Upon his death (454) the wild immigration which he had arrested revived. The Khazars and the Sarogours (i.e. White Ogors, possibly the Barsileens of the Volga delta) were swept along in a flood of mixed Tatar peoples which the conquests of the Avars had set in motion. The Khazars and their companions broke through the Persian defences of the Caucasus. They appropriated the territory up to the Kur and the Aras, and roamed at large through Iberia, Georgia and Armenia. The Persian king implored the emperor Leo I. to help him defend Asia Minor at the Caucasus (457), but Rome was herself too hard pressed, nor was it for fifty years that the Khazars were driven back and the pass of Derbent fortified against them (c. 507).
History.—Among this white race of the steppe, the Khazars can be first identified historically at the end of the 2nd century CE They invaded Armenia alongside the Barsileens in CE 198. They were pushed back and retaliated. The motivations for these early expeditions seemed to be the pressure from the nomads of the steppe and the pursuit of plunder or revenge; however, during the prolonged conflict between the Roman and Persian empires—often fought in Armenia, which eventually became a prize—the Khazars' role took on political significance. Armenia leaned towards the civilization and soon the Christianity of Rome, while its Arsacid princes maintained a long-standing feud with the Sassanids of Persia. Thus, it became a strategy for the Persian kings to enlist the Khazars in every confrontation with the empire (200-350). However, in the 4th century, Persia's increasing power led to the annexation of eastern Armenia. With such a strong neighbor, the Khazars shifted from Persian influence to a distant alliance with Byzantium, which characterized their politics from then on, and they supported Julian in his invasion of Persia (363). Concurrently, as Persia moved closer to the Caucasus, the formidable Hunnic empire emerged among the Ugrians of the northern steppes. The Khazars, surrounded by threats, remained inactive until the rise of Attila (434). Emperor Theodosius sent envoys to bribe the Khazars (Ακάτζιροι) to distract the Huns from the empire by attacking their flank. However, there was a Hunnic faction among the Khazar leaders. The plan was leaked to Attila, and he extinguished the nation's independence in an instant. Khazaria became a territory under his eldest son, serving as the center of governance among the eastern subjects of the Huns (448). Even Attila's harsh rule was better than the ensuing chaos that followed. After his death (454), the uncontrolled migration he had halted resumed. The Khazars and the Sarogours (i.e., White Ogors, possibly the Barsileens of the Volga delta) were swept along by a mix of Tatar peoples spurred by the Avars’ conquests. The Khazars and their allies broke through the Persian defenses of the Caucasus, claiming territory up to the Kur and the Aras, and roamed freely through Iberia, Georgia, and Armenia. The Persian king begged Emperor Leo I for assistance in defending Asia Minor at the Caucasus (457), but Rome was under too much pressure herself, and it wasn’t until fifty years later that the Khazars were pushed back, and the pass of Derbent was fortified against them (c. 507).
Throughout the 6th century Khazaria was the mere highway for the wild hordes to whom the Huns had opened the passage into Europe, and the Khazars took refuge (like the Venetians from Attila) amongst the seventy mouths of the Volga. The pressure of the Turks in Asia precipitated the Avars upon the West. The conquering Turks followed in their footsteps (560-580). They beat down all opposition, wrested even Bosporus in the Crimea from the empire, and by the annihilation of the Ephthalites completed the ruin of the White Race of the plains from the Oxus to the Don. The empires of Turks and Avars, however, ran swiftly their barbaric course, and the Khazars arose out of the chaos to more than their ancient renown. They issued from the land of Barsilia, and extended their rule over the Bulgarian hordes left masterless by the Turks, compelling the more stubborn to migrate to the Danube (641). The agricultural Slavs of the Dnieper and the Oka were reduced to tribute, and before the end of the 7th century the Khazars had annexed the Crimea, had won complete command of the Sea of Azov, and, seizing upon the narrow neck which separates the Volga from the Don, had organized the portage which has continued since an important link in the traffic between Asia and Europe. The alliance with Byzantium was revived. Simultaneously, and no doubt in concert, with the Byzantine campaign against Persia (589), the Khazars had reappeared in Armenia, though it was not till 625 that they appear as Khazars in the Byzantine annals. They are then described as “Turks from the East,” a powerful nation which held the coasts of the Caspian and the Euxine, and took tribute of the Viatitsh, the Severians and the Polyane. The khakan, enticed by the promise of an imperial princess, furnished Heraclius with 40,000 men for his Persian war, who shared in the victory over Chosroes at Nineveh.
Throughout the 6th century, Khazaria was just a highway for the wild hordes that the Huns had opened up to Europe, and the Khazars sought refuge (like the Venetians from Attila) among the seventy mouths of the Volga. The pressure from the Turks in Asia pushed the Avars westward. The conquering Turks followed closely behind (560-580). They crushed all opposition, took even the Bosporus in Crimea from the empire, and by defeating the Ephthalites completed the downfall of the White Race across the plains from the Oxus to the Don. However, the empires of the Turks and Avars quickly ran their barbaric course, and the Khazars emerged from the chaos, exceeding their previous reputation. They came from the land of Barsilia and expanded their rule over the Bulgarian hordes that were left without leaders by the Turks, forcing the more stubborn among them to migrate to the Danube (641). The agricultural Slavs of the Dnieper and the Oka were made to pay tribute, and by the end of the 7th century, the Khazars had annexed Crimea, gained complete control of the Sea of Azov, and seized the narrow land that separates the Volga from the Don, organizing the portage that has remained an important link in the trade between Asia and Europe. The alliance with Byzantium was renewed. At the same time, and likely in conjunction with the Byzantine campaign against Persia (589), the Khazars reappeared in Armenia, though it wasn't until 625 that they were officially noted as Khazars in the Byzantine records. They were then described as “Turks from the East,” a powerful nation that controlled the coasts of the Caspian and Euxine seas and took tribute from the Viatitsh, the Severians, and the Polyane. The khakan, drawn in by the promise of an imperial princess, provided Heraclius with 40,000 men for his Persian war, who participated in the victory over Chosroes at Nineveh.
Meanwhile the Moslem empire had arisen. The Persian empire was struck down (637), and the Moslems poured into Armenia. The khakan, who had defied the summons sent him by the invaders, now aided the Byzantine patrician in the defence of Armenia. The allies were defeated, and the Moslems undertook the subjugation of Khazaria (651). Eighty years of warfare followed, but in the end the Moslems prevailed. The khakan and his chieftains were captured and compelled to embrace Islam (737), and till the decay of the Mahommedan empire Khazaria with all the other countries of the Caucasus paid an annual tribute of children and of corn (737-861). Nevertheless, though overpowered in the end, the Khazars had protected the plains of Europe from the Mahommedans, and made the Caucasus the limit of their conquests.
Meanwhile, the Muslim empire had emerged. The Persian empire fell (637), and the Muslims advanced into Armenia. The khakan, who had ignored the call from the invaders, now assisted the Byzantine patrician in defending Armenia. The allies were defeated, and the Muslims began the conquest of Khazaria (651). Eighty years of warfare followed, but ultimately the Muslims were successful. The khakan and his leaders were captured and forced to convert to Islam (737), and until the decline of the Muslim empire, Khazaria along with all the other countries in the Caucasus paid an annual tribute of children and grain (737-861). Nevertheless, even though they were ultimately overpowered, the Khazars had shielded the plains of Europe from the Muslims and established the Caucasus as the boundary of their conquests.
In the interval between the decline of the Mahommedan empire and the rise of Russia the Khazars reached the zenith of their power. The merchants of Byzantium, Armenia and Bagdad met in the markets of Itil (whither since the raids of the Mahommedans the capital had been transferred from Semender), and traded for the wax, furs, leather and honey that came down the Volga. So important was this traffic held at Constantinople that, when the portage to the Don was endangered by the irruption of a fresh horde of Turks (the Petchenegs), the emperor Theophilus himself despatched the materials and the workmen to build for the Khazars a fortress impregnable to their forays (834). Famous as the one stone structure is in that stoneless region, the post became known far and wide amongst the hordes of the steppe as Sarkel or the White Abode. Merchants from every nation found protection and good faith in the Khazar cities. The Jews, expelled from Constantinople, sought a home amongst them, developed the Khazar trade, and contended with Mahommedans and Christians for the theological allegiance of the Pagan people. The dynasty accepted Judaism (c. 740), but there was equal tolerance for all, and each man was held amenable to the authorized code and to the official judges of his own faith. At the Byzantine court the khakan was held in high honour. The emperor Justinian Rhinotmetus took refuge with him during his exile and married his daughter (702). Justinian’s rival Vardanes in turn sought an asylum in Khazaria, and in Leo IV. (775) the grandson of a Khazar sovereign ascended the Byzantine throne. Khazar troops were amongst the bodyguard of the imperial court; they fought for Leo VI. against Simeon of Bulgaria; and the khakan was honoured in diplomatic intercourse with the seal of three solidi, which marked him as a potentate of the first rank, above even the pope and the Carolingian monarchs. Indeed his dominion became an object of uneasiness to the jealous statecraft of Byzantium, and Constantine Porphyrogenitus, writing for his son’s instruction in the government, carefully enumerates the Alans, the Petchenegs, the Uzes and the Bulgarians as the forces he must rely on to restrain it.
In the time between the fall of the Islamic empire and the rise of Russia, the Khazars reached the peak of their power. Merchants from Byzantium, Armenia, and Baghdad gathered in the markets of Itil (where the capital had been moved from Semender due to the Muslim raids) to trade for the wax, furs, leather, and honey that came down the Volga. The importance of this trade was so recognized in Constantinople that when the transport route to the Don was threatened by a new wave of Turkic invaders (the Pechenegs), Emperor Theophilus himself sent materials and workers to build a fortress for the Khazars that would be invulnerable to their attacks (834). This unique stone structure stood out in that stoneless area and became known far and wide among the steppe tribes as Sarkel or the White Abode. Merchants from every nation found safety and honesty in the Khazar cities. Jews, expelled from Constantinople, sought refuge there, boosted the Khazar trade, and competed with Muslims and Christians for the religious loyalty of the Pagan people. The ruling dynasty adopted Judaism (around 740), but there was equal tolerance for all, and everyone was subject to the legal code and official judges of their own faith. At the Byzantine court, the khakan was highly respected. Emperor Justinian Rhinotmetus took refuge with him during his exile and married his daughter (702). Justinian’s rival Vardanes also sought asylum in Khazaria, and Leo IV. (775), the grandson of a Khazar ruler, eventually became emperor of Byzantium. Khazar troops served as part of the imperial bodyguard; they fought for Leo VI. against Simeon of Bulgaria, and the khakan was honored in diplomatic matters with the seal of three solidi, indicating his status as a top-ranking leader, even above the pope and the Carolingian kings. Indeed, his power became a concern for the envious statesmen of Byzantium, and Constantine Porphyrogenitus, writing to instruct his son on governance, carefully listed the Alans, Pechenegs, Uzes, and Bulgarians as the forces he must rely on to keep it in check.
It was, however, from a power that Constantine did not consider that the overthrow of the Khazars came. The arrival of the Varangians amidst the scattered Slavs (862) had united them into a nation. The advance of the Petchenegs from the East gave the Russians their opportunity. Before the onset of those fierce invaders the precarious suzerainty of the khakan broke up. By calling in the Uzes, the Khazars did indeed dislodge the Petchenegs from the position they had seized in the heart of the kingdom between the Volga and the Don, but only to drive them inwards to the Dnieper. The Hungarians, severed from their kindred and their rulers, migrated to the Carpathians, whilst Oleg, the Russ prince of Kiev, passed through the Slav tribes of the Dnieper basin with the cry “Pay nothing to the Khazars” (884). The kingdom dwindled rapidly to its ancient limits between the Caucasus, the Volga and the Don, whilst the Russian traders of Novgorod and Kiev supplanted the Khazars as the carriers between Constantinople and the North. When Ibn Faḍlān visited Khazaria forty years later, Itil was even yet a great city, with baths and market-places and thirty mosques. But there was no domestic product nor manufacture; the kingdom depended solely upon the now precarious transit dues, and administration was in the hands of a major domus also called khakan. At the assault of Swiatoslav of Kiev the rotten fabric crumbled into dust. His troops were equally at home on land and water. Sarkel, Itil and Semender surrendered to him (965-969). He pushed his conquests to the Caucasus, and established Russian colonies upon the Sea of Azov. The principality of Tmutarakan, founded by his grandson Mstislav (988), replaced the kingdom of Khazaria, the last trace of which was extinguished by a joint expedition of Russians and Byzantines (1016). The last of the khakans, George, Tzula, was taken prisoner. A remnant of the nation took refuge in an island of the Caspian (Siahcouyé); others retired to the Caucasus; part emigrated to the district of Kasakhi in Georgia, and appear for the last time joining with Georgia in her successful effort to throw off the yoke of the Seljuk Turks (1089). But the name is thought to survive in Kadzaria, the Georgian title for Mingrelia, and in Kadzaro, the Turkish word for the Lazis. Till the 13th century the Crimea was known to European travellers as Gazaria; the “ramparts of the Khazars” are still distinguished in the Ukraine; and the record of their dominion survives in the names of Kazarek, Kazaritshi, Kazarinovod, Kozar-owka, Kozari, and perhaps in Kazan.
It was, however, from a source that Constantine didn't recognize that the downfall of the Khazars occurred. The arrival of the Varangians among the scattered Slavs in 862 united them into a nation. The advance of the Petchenegs from the East provided the Russians with their chance. Before the attack of those fierce invaders, the fragile control of the khakan fell apart. By inviting the Uzes, the Khazars did manage to push the Petchenegs out of the position they had taken in the heart of the kingdom between the Volga and the Don, but only to force them back towards the Dnieper. The Hungarians, separated from their relatives and rulers, migrated to the Carpathians, while Oleg, the Russ prince of Kiev, moved through the Slav tribes of the Dnieper basin shouting, “Pay nothing to the Khazars” in 884. The kingdom quickly shrank back to its old boundaries between the Caucasus, the Volga, and the Don, while the Russian traders from Novgorod and Kiev replaced the Khazars as the carriers between Constantinople and the North. When Ibn Faḍlān visited Khazaria forty years later, Itil was still a large city, with baths, marketplaces, and thirty mosques. But it had no domestic products or manufacturing; the kingdom depended entirely on the now unstable transit fees, and administration was managed by a major domus also known as khakan. Under the attack from Swiatoslav of Kiev, the crumbling structure fell apart. His troops were equally skilled on land and water. Sarkel, Itil, and Semender surrendered to him between 965 and 969. He extended his conquests to the Caucasus and established Russian colonies along the Sea of Azov. The principality of Tmutarakan, founded by his grandson Mstislav in 988, took the place of the kingdom of Khazaria, the last remnants of which were eradicated by a joint expedition of Russians and Byzantines in 1016. The last of the khakans, George Tzula, was captured. A portion of the nation found refuge on an island in the Caspian (Siahcouyé); others retreated to the Caucasus; some migrated to the Kasakhi region in Georgia and appeared for the last time joining forces with Georgia in its successful effort to shake off the rule of the Seljuk Turks in 1089. However, the name is believed to survive in Kadzaria, the Georgian name for Mingrelia, and in Kadzaro, the Turkish word for the Lazis. Until the 13th century, the Crimea was known to European travelers as Gazaria; the “ramparts of the Khazars” are still recognized in Ukraine; and the legacy of their rule lives on in the names Kazarek, Kazaritshi, Kazarinovod, Kozar-owka, Kozari, and possibly in Kazan.
Authorities.—Khazar: The letter of King Joseph to R. Hasdai Ibn Shaprūt, first published by J. Akrish, Kol Mebasser (Constantinople, 1577), and often reprinted in editions of Jehuda hal-Levy’s Kuzari. German translations by Zedner (Berlin, 1840) and Cassel, Magyar. Alterth. (Berlin, 1848); French by Carmoly, Rev. Or. (1841). Cf. Harkavy, Russische Revue, iv. 69; Graetz, Geschichte, v. 364, and Carmoly, Itinéraires de la Terre Sainte (Brussels, 1847). Armenian: Moses of Chorene; cf. Saint-Martin, Mémoires historiques et géographiques sur l’Armènie (Paris, 1818). Arabic: The account of Ibn Faḍlān (921) is preserved by Yākūt, ii. 436 seq. See also Iṣṭakhry (ed. de Geoje, pp. 220 seq.), Mas‘ūdy, ch. xvii. pp. 406 seq. of Sprenger’s translation; Ibn Ḥauḳal (ed. de Goeje, pp. 279 seq.) and the histories of Ibn el Athīr and Ṭabary. Much of the Arabic material has been collected and translated by Fraehn, “Veteres Memoriae Chasarorum” in Mém. de St Pét. (1822); Dorn (from the Persian Ṭabary), Mém. de St Pét. (1844); Dufrémery, Journ. As. (1849). See also D’Ohsson’s imaginary Voyage d’Abul Cassim, based on these sources. Byzantine Historians: The relative passages are collected in Stritter’s Memoriae populorum (St Petersburg, 1778). Russian: The Chronicle ascribed to Nestor.
Authorities.—Khazar: The letter from King Joseph to R. Hasdai Ibn Shaprūt was first published by J. Akrish in Kol Mebasser (Constantinople, 1577) and has been frequently reprinted in editions of Jehuda hal-Levy’s Kuzari. There are German translations by Zedner (Berlin, 1840) and Cassel, Magyar. Alterth. (Berlin, 1848); French by Carmoly, Rev. Or. (1841). See also Harkavy, Russische Revue, iv. 69; Graetz, Geschichte, v. 364, and Carmoly, Itinéraires de la Terre Sainte (Brussels, 1847). Armenian: Moses of Chorene; refer to Saint-Martin, Mémoires historiques et géographiques sur l’Armènie (Paris, 1818). Arabic: The account from Ibn Faḍlān (921) is preserved by Yākūt, ii. 436 seq. Also check Iṣṭakhry (ed. de Geoje, pp. 220 seq.), Mas‘ūdy, ch. xvii. pp. 406 seq. of Sprenger’s translation; Ibn Ḥauḳal (ed. de Goeje, pp. 279 seq.) and the histories of Ibn el Athīr and Ṭabary. A lot of the Arabic material has been gathered and translated by Fraehn, “Veteres Memoriae Chasarorum” in Mém. de St Pét. (1822); Dorn (from the Persian Ṭabary), Mém. de St Pét. (1844); Dufrémery, Journ. As. (1849). Also see D’Ohsson’s fictional Voyage d’Abul Cassim, which is based on these sources. Byzantine Historians: The relevant passages are collected in Stritter’s Memoriae populorum (St Petersburg, 1778). Russian: The Chronicle attributed to Nestor.
Modern: Klaproth, “Mém. sur les Khazars,” in Journ. As. 1st series, vol. iii.; id., Tableaux hist. de l’Asie (Paris, 1823); id., Tabl. hist. de Caucases (1827); memoirs on the Khazars by Harkavy and by Howorth (Congrès intern. des Orientalistes, vol. ii.); Latham, Russian and Turk, pp. 209-217; Vivien St Martin, Études de géog. ancienne (Paris, 1850); id., Recherches sur les populations du Caucase (1847); id., “Sur les Khazars,” in Nouvelles ann. des voyages (1857); D’Ohsson, Peuples du Caucase (Paris, 1828); S. Krauss, “Zur Geschichte der Chazaren,” in Revue orientale pour les études Ourals-altaïques (1900).
Modern: Klaproth, “Memoir on the Khazars,” in Journal Asiatique 1st series, vol. iii.; id., Historical Tables of Asia (Paris, 1823); id., Historical Tables of the Caucasus (1827); memoirs on the Khazars by Harkavy and Howorth (International Congress of Orientalists, vol. ii.); Latham, Russian and Turk, pp. 209-217; Vivien St Martin, Studies on Ancient Geography (Paris, 1850); id., Research on the Populations of the Caucasus (1847); id., “On the Khazars,” in New Annals of Travel (1857); D’Ohsson, People of the Caucasus (Paris, 1828); S. Krauss, “On the History of the Khazars,” in Oriental Review for Ural-Altaic Studies (1900).


KHERI, a district of British India, in the Lucknow division of the United Provinces, which takes its name from a small town with a railway station 81 m. N.W. of Lucknow. The area of the district is 2963 sq. m., and its population in 1901 was 905,138. It consists of a series of fairly elevated plateaus, separated by rivers flowing from the north-west, each bordered by alluvial land. North of the river Ul, the country is considered very unhealthy. Through this tract, probably the bed of a lake, flow two rivers, the Kauriala and Chauka, changing their courses constantly, so that the surface is seamed with deserted river beds much below the level of the surrounding country. The vegetation is very dense, and the stagnant waters are the cause of endemic fevers. The people reside in the neighbourhood of the low ground, as the soil is more fertile and less expensive to cultivate than the forest-covered uplands. South of the Ul, the scene changes. Between every two rivers or tributaries stretches a plain, considerably less elevated than the tract to the north. There is very little slope in any of these plains for many miles, and marshes are formed, from which emerge the headwaters of many secondary streams, which in the rains become dangerous torrents, and frequently cause devastating floods. The general drainage of the country is from north-west to south-east. Several large lakes exist, some formed by the ancient channels of the northern rivers, being fine sheets of water, from 10 to 20 ft. deep and from 3 to 4 m. long; in places they are fringed with magnificent groves. The whole north of the district is covered with vast forests, of which a considerable portion are government reserves. Sāl occupies about two-thirds of the forest area. The district is traversed by a branch of the Oudh & Rohilkhand railway from Lucknow to Bareilly.
KHERI, is a district in British India, part of the Lucknow division of the United Provinces, named after a small town with a railway station located 81 miles northwest of Lucknow. The district covers an area of 2,963 square miles, and its population was 905,138 in 1901. It consists of a series of relatively elevated plateaus, separated by rivers that flow from the northwest, each surrounded by fertile alluvial land. North of the Ul River, the area is considered very unhealthy. Two rivers, the Kauriala and Chauka, flow through this region, which is likely the bed of a former lake, constantly shifting their courses and leaving behind abandoned riverbeds significantly lower than the surrounding land. The vegetation is lush, and the stagnant water contributes to endemic fevers. People tend to live near the low-lying areas because the soil there is more fertile and easier to cultivate than the forest-covered highlands. South of the Ul, the landscape changes. Between every two rivers or tributaries lies a plain that is much lower than the region to the north. These plains have very little slope for many miles and form marshes, giving rise to the headwaters of many smaller streams that can turn into dangerous torrents during the rainy season, often leading to severe flooding. The general drainage of the area flows from northwest to southeast. Several large lakes exist here, some created by the former paths of northern rivers, featuring clear waters that range from 10 to 20 feet deep and 3 to 4 miles long; some areas are bordered by beautiful groves. The entire northern part of the district is blanketed in extensive forests, a significant portion of which are government reserves. Sāl trees cover about two-thirds of the forested area. The district is crossed by a branch of the Oudh & Rohilkhand railway from Lucknow to Bareilly.

KHERSON, a government of south Russia, on the N. coast of the Black Sea, bounded W. by the governments of Bessarabia and Podolia, N. by Kiev and Poltava, S. by Ekaterinoslav and Taurida. The area is 27,497 sq. m. The aspect of the country, especially in the south, is that of an open steppe, and almost the whole government is destitute of forest. The Dniester marks the western and the Dnieper the south-eastern boundary; the Bug, the Ingul and several minor streams drain the intermediate territory. Along the shore stretch extensive lagoons. Iron, kaolin and salt are the principal minerals. Nearly 45% of the land is owned by the peasants, 31% by the nobility, 12% by other classes, and 12% by the crown, municipalities and public institutions. The peasants rent 1,730,000 acres more from the landlords. Agriculture is well developed and 9,000,000 acres (51.1%) are under crops. Agricultural machinery is extensively used. The vine is widely grown, and yields 1,220,000 gallons of wine annually. Some tobacco is grown and manufactured. Besides the ordinary cereals, maize, hemp, flax, tobacco and mustard are commonly grown; the fruit trees in general cultivation include the cherry, plum, peach, apricot and mulberry; and gardening receives considerable attention. Agriculture has been greatly improved by some seventy German colonies. Cattle-breeding, horse-breeding and sheep-farming are pursued on a large scale. Some sheep farmers own 30,000 or 40,000 merinos each. Fishing is an important occupation. There are manufactures of wool, hemp and leather; also iron-works, machinery and especially agricultural machinery works, sugar factories, steam flour-mills and chemical works. The ports of Kherson, Ochakov, Nikolayev, and especially Odessa, are among the principal outlets of Russian commerce; Berislav, Alexandriya Elisavetgrad, Voznesenask, Olviopol and Tiraspol play an important part in the inland traffic. In 1871 the total population was 1,661,892, and in 1897 2,744,040, of whom 1,332,175 were women and 785,094 lived in towns. The estimated pop. in 1906 was 3,257,600. Besides Great and Little Russians, it comprises Rumanians, Greeks, Germans (123,453), Bulgarians, Bohemians, Swedes, and Jews (30% of the total), and some Gypsies. About 84% belong to the Orthodox Greek Church; there are also numerous Stundists. The government is divided into six districts, the chief towns of which are: Kherson (q.v.), Alexandriya (14,002 in 1897), Ananiev (16,713), Elisavetgrad (66,182 in 1900), Odessa (449,673 in 1900), and Tiraspol (29,323 in 1900). This region was long subject to the sway of the Tatar khans of the Crimea, and owes its rapid growth to the colonizing activity of Catherine II., who between 1778 and 1792 founded the cities of Kherson, Odessa and Nikolayev. Down to 1803 this government was called Nikolayev.
KHERSОN, is a government in southern Russia, located on the northern coast of the Black Sea, bordered on the west by the governments of Bessarabia and Podolia, on the north by Kiev and Poltava, and on the south by Ekaterinoslav and Taurida. The area covers 27,497 square miles. The landscape, especially in the south, resembles an open steppe, and almost the entire region lacks forests. The Dniester river marks the western boundary and the Dnieper river marks the southeastern boundary; the Bug, Ingul, and several smaller streams drain the land in between. Extensive lagoons stretch along the coastline. The main minerals are iron, kaolin, and salt. Nearly 45% of the land is owned by peasants, 31% by the nobility, 12% by other social classes, and 12% by the crown, municipalities, and public institutions. Peasants also rent an additional 1,730,000 acres from landowners. Agriculture is highly developed, with 9,000,000 acres (51.1%) cultivated. Agricultural machinery is widely used. Grapes are grown extensively, producing 1,220,000 gallons of wine every year. Some tobacco is cultivated and processed. In addition to common cereal crops, maize, hemp, flax, tobacco, and mustard are typically grown; popular fruit trees include cherry, plum, peach, apricot, and mulberry; and gardening is given much attention. Agriculture has greatly benefited from around seventy German colonies. Cattle, horse, and sheep farming are conducted on a large scale, with some sheep farmers owning 30,000 to 40,000 merinos each. Fishing is a significant occupation. There are industries for producing wool, hemp, and leather, as well as ironworks, machinery production—especially for agricultural machinery—sugar factories, steam flour mills, and chemical plants. The ports of Kherson, Ochakov, Nikolayev, and especially Odessa are key outlets for Russian trade; Berislav, Alexandriya, Elisavetgrad, Voznesenask, Olviopol, and Tiraspol also play important roles in inland trade. In 1871, the total population was 1,661,892, which grew to 2,744,040 by 1897, with 1,332,175 women and 785,094 residents living in towns. The estimated population in 1906 was 3,257,600. In addition to Great and Little Russians, the population includes Rumanians, Greeks, Germans (123,453), Bulgarians, Bohemians, Swedes, and Jews (30% of the total), as well as some Gypsies. About 84% of the population belongs to the Orthodox Greek Church, with numerous Stundists as well. The government is divided into six districts, with chief towns including Kherson (q.v.), Alexandriya (14,002 in 1897), Ananiev (16,713), Elisavetgrad (66,182 in 1900), Odessa (449,673 in 1900), and Tiraspol (29,323 in 1900). This region was long under the control of the Tatar khans of the Crimea and its rapid growth can be attributed to the colonization efforts of Catherine II, who founded the cities of Kherson, Odessa, and Nikolayev between 1778 and 1792. Until 1803, this government was known as Nikolayev.

KHERSON, a town of south Russia, capital of the above government, on a hill above the right bank of the Dnieper, about 19 m. from its mouth. Founded by the courtier Potemkin in 1778 as a naval station and seaport, it had become by 1786 a place of 10,000 inhabitants, and, although its progress was checked by the rise of Odessa and the removal (in 1794) of the naval establishments to Nikolayev, it had in 1900 a population of 73,185. The Dnieper at this point breaks into several arms, forming islands overgrown with reeds and bushes; and vessels of burden must anchor at Stanislavskoe-selo, a good way down the stream. Of the traffic on the river the largest share is due to the timber, wool, cereals, cattle and hides trade; wool-dressing, soap-boiling, tallow-melting, brewing, flour-milling and the manufacture of tobacco are the chief industries. Kherson is a substantially built and regular town. The cathedral is the burial-place of Potemkin, and near Kherson lie the remains of John Howard, the English philanthropist, who died here in 1790. The fortifications have fallen into decay. The name Kherson was given to the town from the supposition that the site was formerly that of Chersonesus Heracleotica, the Greek city founded by the Dorians of Heraclea.
KHERSON, a town in southern Russia, is the capital of the government mentioned above, located on a hill above the right bank of the Dnieper River, about 19 miles from its mouth. Founded by the courtier Potemkin in 1778 as a naval station and seaport, it became a community of 10,000 people by 1786. Although its growth was hindered by the rise of Odessa and the relocation (in 1794) of naval operations to Nikolayev, it had a population of 73,185 by 1900. The Dnieper at this point splits into several branches, creating islands covered with reeds and bushes; as a result, cargo vessels must anchor at Stanislavskoe-selo, quite a distance downstream. The majority of the river's traffic comes from the timber, wool, grains, cattle, and hides trade. The main industries include wool processing, soap making, tallow rendering, brewing, flour milling, and tobacco manufacturing. Kherson is a well-constructed and orderly town. The cathedral serves as the burial site for Potemkin, and near Kherson are the remains of John Howard, the English philanthropist who died here in 1790. The fortifications have fallen into disrepair. The name Kherson was given to the town based on the belief that the site was once the location of Chersonesus Heracleotica, the Greek city established by the Dorians of Heraclea.

KHEVENHÜLLER, LUDWIG ANDREAS (1683-1744), Austrian field-marshal, Count of Aschelberg-Frankenburg, came of a noble family, which, originally Franconian, settled in Carinthia in the 11th century. He first saw active service under Prince Eugène in the War of the Spanish Succession, and by 1716 had risen to the command of Prince Eugène’s own regiment of dragoons. He distinguished himself greatly at the battles of Peterwardein and Belgrade, and became in 1723 major-general of cavalry (General-Wachtmeister), in 1726 proprietary colonel of a regiment and in 1733 lieutenant field marshal. In 1734 the War of the Polish Succession brought him into the field again. He was present at the battle of Parma (June 29), where Count Mercy, the Austrian commander, was killed, and after Mercy’s death he held the chief command of the army in Italy till Field Marshal Königsegg’s arrival. Under Königsegg he again distinguished himself at the battle of Guastalla (September 19). He was once more in command during the operations which followed the battle, and his skilful generalship won for him the grade of general of cavalry. He continued in military and diplomatic employment in Italy to the close of the war. In 1737 he was made field marshal, Prince Eugène recommending him to his sovereign as the best general in the service. His chief exploit in the Turkish War, which soon followed his promotion, was at Radojevatz (September 28, 1737), where he cut his way through a greatly superior Turkish army. It was in the Austrian Succession War that his most brilliant work was done. As commander-in-chief of the army on the Danube he not only drove out the French and Bavarian invaders of Austria in a few days of rapid marching and sharp engagements (January, 1742), but overran southern Bavaria, captured Munich, and forced a large French corps in Linz to surrender. Later in the summer of 1742, owing to the inadequate forces at his disposal, he had to evacuate his conquests, but in the following campaign, though now subordinated to Prince Charles of Lorraine, Khevenhüller 777 reconquered southern Bavaria, and forced the emperor in June to conclude the unfavourable convention of Nieder-Schönfeld. He disapproved the advance beyond the Rhine which followed these successes, and the event justified his fears, for the Austrians had to fall back from the Rhine through Franconia and the Breisgau, Khevenhüller himself conducting the retreat with admirable skill. On his return to Vienna, Maria Theresa decorated the field marshal with the order of the Golden Fleece. He died suddenly at Vienna on the 26th of January 1744.
KHEVENHÜLLER, LUDWIG ANDREAS (1683-1744), Austrian field marshal, Count of Aschelberg-Frankenburg, came from a noble family that originally hailed from Franconia and settled in Carinthia in the 11th century. He first saw active service under Prince Eugène during the War of the Spanish Succession and, by 1716, had risen to command Prince Eugène’s dragoon regiment. He made a significant impact at the battles of Peterwardein and Belgrade and was appointed major-general of cavalry (General-Wachtmeister) in 1723, proprietary colonel of a regiment in 1726, and lieutenant field marshal in 1733. The War of the Polish Succession brought him back to the battlefield in 1734. He was present at the battle of Parma (June 29), where Count Mercy, the Austrian commander, was killed. After Mercy's death, he took command of the army in Italy until Field Marshal Königsegg arrived. Under Königsegg, he distinguished himself again at the battle of Guastalla (September 19). He was in command during the operations that followed this battle, and his skillful leadership earned him the rank of general of cavalry. He remained active in military and diplomatic roles in Italy until the war's end. In 1737, he was promoted to field marshal, with Prince Eugène recommending him as the best general in the service. His most notable action during the Turkish War, shortly after his promotion, was at Radojevatz (September 28, 1737), where he broke through a much larger Turkish army. His most impressive achievements came during the War of the Austrian Succession. As the commander-in-chief of the army on the Danube, he quickly expelled the French and Bavarian forces invading Austria in just a few days of rapid movements and fierce battles (January 1742), overran southern Bavaria, captured Munich, and forced a large French contingent in Linz to surrender. Later in the summer of 1742, due to insufficient forces, he had to retreat from his conquests, but in the following campaign, now under Prince Charles of Lorraine, Khevenhüller reconquered southern Bavaria and compelled the emperor to sign the unfavorable convention of Nieder-Schönfeld in June. He opposed advancing beyond the Rhine after these successes, and his concerns were validated as the Austrians had to retreat from the Rhine through Franconia and the Breisgau, with Khevenhüller skillfully leading the retreat. Upon his return to Vienna, Maria Theresa honored the field marshal with the order of the Golden Fleece. He passed away suddenly in Vienna on January 26, 1744.
He was the author of various instructional works for officers and soldiers (Des G. F. M. Grafen v. Khevenhüller Observationspunkte für sein Dragoner-regiment (1734 and 1748) and a règlement for the infantry (1737), and of an important work on war in general, Kurzer Begriff aller militärischen Operationen (Vienna, 1756; French version, Maximes de guerre, Paris, 1771).
He wrote several instructional works for officers and soldiers, including Des G. F. M. Grafen v. Khevenhüller Observationspunkte für sein Dragoner-regiment (1734 and 1748) and a règlement for the infantry (1737), as well as a significant book on warfare in general, Kurzer Begriff aller militärischen Operationen (Vienna, 1756; French version, Maximes de guerre, Paris, 1771).

KHEVSURS, a people of the Caucasus, kinsfolk of the Georgians. They live in scattered groups in East Georgia to the north and north-west of Mount Borbalo. Their name is Georgian and means “People of the Valleys.” For the most part nomadic, they are still in a semi-barbarous state. They have not the beauty of the Georgian race. They are gaunt and thin to almost a ghastly extent, their generally repulsive aspect being accentuated by their large hands and feet and their ferocious expression. In complexion and colour of hair and eyes they vary greatly. They are very muscular and capable of bearing extraordinary fatigue. They are fond of fighting, and still wear armour of the true medieval type. This panoply is worn when the law of vendetta, which is sacred among them as among most Caucasian peoples, compels them to seek or avoid their enemy. They carry a spiked gauntlet, the terrible marks of which are borne by a large proportion of the Khevsur faces.
Khevsurs, are a group from the Caucasus, related to the Georgians. They live in scattered communities in East Georgia, to the north and northwest of Mount Borbalo. Their name comes from Georgian and means “People of the Valleys.” Mostly nomadic, they still exist in a semi-wild state. They don't have the beauty typical of the Georgian people. They are lean and thin to an almost eerie degree, with their generally unattractive appearance emphasized by their large hands and feet and fierce expressions. Their skin tone, hair, and eye color can vary widely. They are very strong and able to endure great fatigue. They enjoy fighting and still wear armor typical of the medieval era. This gear is worn when the sacred law of vendetta, which is important to them like it is for many Caucasian groups, forces them to confront or evade their enemies. They carry a spiked gauntlet, which has left visible scars on many Khevsur faces.
Many curious customs still prevail among the Khevsurs, as for instance the imprisonment of the woman during childbirth in a lonely hut, round which the husband parades, firing off his musket at intervals. After delivery, food is surreptitiously brought the mother, who is kept in her prison a month, after which the hut is burnt. The boys are usually named after some wild animal, e.g. bear or wolf, while the girls’ names are romantic, such as Daughter of the Sun, Sun of my Heart. Marriages are arranged by parents when the bride and bridegroom are still in long clothes. The chief ceremony is a forcible abduction of the girl. Divorce is very common, and some Khevsurs are polygamous. Formerly no Khevsur might die in a house, but was always carried out under the sun or stars. The Khevsurs like to call themselves Christians, but their religion is a mixture of Christianity, Mahommedanism and heathen rites. They keep the Sabbath of the Christian church, the Friday of the Moslems and the Saturday of the Jews. They worship sacred trees and offer sacrifices to the spirits of the earth and air. Their priests are a combination of medicine-men and divines.
Many curious customs still exist among the Khevsurs. For instance, a woman giving birth is isolated in a remote hut, while her husband walks around it, occasionally firing his musket. After the baby is born, food is secretly delivered to the mother, who remains in her confinement for a month, after which the hut is burned down. Boys are usually named after wild animals, like bear or wolf, while girls receive more romantic names, such as Daughter of the Sun or Sun of my Heart. Marriages are arranged by parents when the bride and groom are still young children. The main event of the ceremony involves the forcible abduction of the girl. Divorce is quite common, and some Khevsurs practice polygamy. In the past, no Khevsur was allowed to die inside a house, and they were always carried out into the sunlight or under the stars. The Khevsurs like to call themselves Christians, but their beliefs blend elements of Christianity, Islam, and pagan rituals. They observe the Sabbath of the Christian church, Friday for Muslims, and Saturday for Jews. They worship sacred trees and make offerings to the spirits of the earth and air. Their priests function as a mix of healers and religious leaders.
See G. F. R. Radde, Die Chevs’uren und ihr Land (Cassel, 1878); Ernest Chantre, Recherches anthropologiques dans le Caucase (Lyons, 1885-1887).
See G. F. R. Radde, Die Chevs’uren und ihr Land (Cassel, 1878); Ernest Chantre, Recherches anthropologiques dans le Caucase (Lyons, 1885-1887).

KHILCHIPUR, a mediatized chiefship in Central India, under the Bhopal agency; area, 273 sq. m.; pop. (1901), 31,143; estimated revenue, £7000; tribute payable to Sindhia, £700. The residence of the chief, who is a Khichi Rajput of the Chauhan clan, is at Khilchipur (pop. 5121).
KHILCHIPUR, is a media-driven chiefdom in Central India, part of the Bhopal agency; covering an area of 273 square miles; population (1901) was 31,143; estimated revenue is £7,000; tribute to be paid to Sindhia is £700. The chief, who belongs to the Khichi Rajput of the Chauhan clan, lives in Khilchipur (population 5,121).

(1) Great Khingan is the eastern border ridge of the immense plateau which may be traced from the Himalaya to Bering Strait and from the Tian-shan Mountains to the Khingan Mountains. It is well known from 50° N. to Kalgan (41° N., 115° E.), where it is crossed by the highway from Urga to Peking. As a border ridge of the Mongolian plateau, it possesses very great orographical importance, in that it is an important climatic boundary, and constitutes the western limits of the Manchurian flora. The base of its western slope, which is very gentle, lies at altitudes of 3000 to 3500 ft. Its crest rises to 4800 to 6500 ft., but its eastern slope sinks very precipitately to the plains of Manchuria, which have only 1500 to 2000 ft. of altitude. On this stretch one or two subordinate ridges, parallel to the main range and separated from it by longitudinal valleys, fringe its eastern slope, thus marking two different terraces and giving to the whole system a width of from 80 to 100 m. Basalts, trachytes and other volcanic formations are found in the main range and on its south-eastern slopes. The range was in volcanic activity in 1720-1721.
(1) Greater Khingan is the eastern border ridge of the vast plateau that stretches from the Himalayas to the Bering Strait and from the Tian-shan Mountains to the Khingan Mountains. It is well known from 50° N. to Kalgan (41° N., 115° E.), where it intersects with the highway from Urga to Peking. As a border ridge of the Mongolian plateau, it is extremely significant orographically, serving as an important climate boundary and defining the western limits of Manchurian plant life. The base of its gentle western slope sits at elevations of 3,000 to 3,500 feet. Its peak rises to 4,800 to 6,500 feet, while its eastern slope drops sharply to the plains of Manchuria, which range from 1,500 to 2,000 feet in altitude. Along this stretch, one or two smaller ridges, parallel to the main range and separated by longitudinal valleys, line its eastern slope, creating two distinct terraces and giving the entire system a width of 80 to 100 meters. Basalts, trachytes, and other volcanic formations can be found in the main range and on its southeastern slopes. The range was volcanically active in 1720-1721.
South-west of Peking the Great Khingan is continued by the In-shan mountains, which exhibit similar features to those of the Great Khingan, and represent the same terraced escarpment of the Mongolian plateau. Moreover, it appears from the map of the Russian General Staff (surveys of Skassi, V. A. Obruchev, G. N. Potanin, &c.) that similar terrace-shaped escarpments—but considerably wider apart than in Manchuria—occur in the Shan-si province of China, along the southern border of the South Mongolian plateau. These escarpments are pierced by the Yellow River or Hwang-ho south of the Great Wall, between 38° and 39° N., and in all probability a border range homologous to the Great Khingan separates the upper tributaries of the Hwang-ho (namely the Tan-ho) from those of the Yang-tsze-kiang. But according to Obruchev the escarpments of the Wei-tsi-shan and Lu-huang-lin, by which southern Ordos drops towards the Wei-ho (tributary of the Hwang-ho), can hardly be taken as corresponding to the Kalgan escarpment. They fall with gentle slopes only towards the high plains on the south of them, while a steep descent towards the low plain seems to exist further south only, between 32° and 34°. Thus the southern continuations of the Great Khingan, south of 38° N., possibly consist of two separate escarpments. At its northern end the place where the Great Khingan is pierced by the Amur has not been ascertained by direct observation. Prince P. Kropotkin considers that the upper Amur emerges from the high plateau and its border-ridge, the Khingan, below Albazin and above Kumara.1 If this view prevail—Petermann has adopted it for his map of Asia, and it has been upheld in all the Gotha publications—it would appear that the Great Khingan joins the Stanovoi ridge or Jukjur, in that portion of it which faces the west coast of the Sea of Okhotsk. At any rate the Khingan, separating the Mongolian plateau from the much lower plains of the Sungari and the Nonni, is one of the most important orographical dividing-lines in Asia.
Southwest of Beijing, the Great Khingan continues into the In-shan mountains, which have similar characteristics to those of the Great Khingan and are part of the same terraced escarpment of the Mongolian plateau. Furthermore, the map from the Russian General Staff (surveys by Skassi, V. A. Obruchev, G. N. Potanin, etc.) shows that similar terrace-like escarpments—though spaced farther apart than in Manchuria—exist in the Shanxi province of China, along the southern edge of the South Mongolian plateau. These escarpments are crossed by the Yellow River, or Hwang-ho, south of the Great Wall, between 38° and 39° N. It’s likely that a border range similar to the Great Khingan separates the upper tributaries of the Hwang-ho (specifically the Tan-ho) from those of the Yangtze River. However, according to Obruchev, the escarpments of the Wei-tsi-shan and Lu-huang-lin, where southern Ordos descends towards the Wei-ho (a tributary of the Hwang-ho), cannot be directly compared to the Kalgan escarpment. They slope gently towards the high plains to the south, while a steep drop to the low plain seems to only exist further south, between 32° and 34°. Therefore, the southern extensions of the Great Khingan, south of 38° N., might consist of two separate escarpments. At the northern end, the exact location where the Great Khingan is pierced by the Amur hasn't been determined through direct observation. Prince P. Kropotkin suggests that the upper Amur comes out from the high plateau and its border ridge, the Khingan, below Albazin and above Kumara. If this theory is accepted—Petermann has included it on his map of Asia, and it's been supported in all the Gotha publications—then it seems the Great Khingan connects with the Stanovoi ridge or Jukjur, in the part facing the west coast of the Sea of Okhotsk. Regardless, the Khingan, which separates the Mongolian plateau from the much lower plains of the Sungari and the Nonni, is one of the most significant geographical dividing lines in Asia.
See Semenov’s Geographical Dictionary (in Russian); D. V. Putiata, Expedition to the Khingan in 1891 (St Petersburg, 1893); Potanin, “Journey to the Khingan,” in Izvestia Russ. Geog. Soc. (1901).
See Semenov’s Geographical Dictionary (in Russian); D. V. Putiata, Expedition to the Khingan in 1891 (St Petersburg, 1893); Potanin, “Journey to the Khingan,” in Izvestia Russ. Geog. Soc. (1901).
(2) The name Little Khingan is applied indiscriminately to two distinct mountain ranges. The proper application of the term would be to reserve it for the typical range which the Amur pierces 40 m. below Ekaterino-Nikolsk (on the Amur), and which is also known as the Bureya mountains, and as Dusse-alin. This range, which may be traced from the Amur to the Sea of Okhotsk, seems to be cleft twice by the Sungari and to be continued under different local names in the same south-westerly direction to the peninsula of Liao-tung in Manchuria. The other range to which the name of Little Khingan is applied is that of the Ilkhuri-alin mountains (51° N., 122°-126° E.), which run in a north-westerly direction between the upper Nonni and the Amur, west of Blagovyeshchensk.
(2) The name Little Khingan is used loosely for two different mountain ranges. The correct usage should be to refer it to the main range that the Amur River goes through, located 40 meters below Ekaterino-Nikolsk (on the Amur), which is also known as the Bureya mountains or Dusse-alin. This range can be traced from the Amur to the Sea of Okhotsk and appears to be split in two by the Sungari, continuing under various local names in the same south-west direction to the Liao-tung peninsula in Manchuria. The other range referred to as Little Khingan is the Ilkhuri-alin mountains (51° N., 122°-126° E.), which run north-west between the upper Nonni and the Amur, to the west of Blagovyeshchensk.

KHIVA, formerly an important kingdom of Asia, but now a much reduced khanate, dependent upon Russia, and confined to the delta of the Amu-darya (Oxus). Its frontier runs down the left bank of the Amu, from 40° 15′ N., and down its left branch to Lake Aral; then, for about 40 m. along the south coast of Lake Aral, and finally southwards, following the escarpment of the Ust-Urt plateau. From the Transcaspian territory of Russia Khiva is separated by a line running almost W.N.W.-E.S.E. under 40° 30′ N., from the Uzboi depression to the Amu-darya. The length of the khanate from north to south is 200 m., and its greatest width 300 m. The area of the Khiva oasis is 5210 sq. m. while the area of the steppes is estimated at 17,000 sq. m. The population of the former is estimated at 400,000, and that of the latter also at 400,000 (nomadic). The water of the Amu is brought by a number of irrigation canals to the oasis, the general declivity of the surface westwards facilitating the irrigation. Several old beds of the Amu intersect the territory. The water of the Amu and the very thin layer of ooze which it deposits render the oasis very fertile. Millet, rice, wheat, barley, oats, peas, flax, hemp, madder, and all sorts of vegetables and fruit (especially melons) are grown, as also the vine and cotton. The white-washed houses scattered amidst the elms and poplars, and surrounded by flourishing fields, produce the most agreeable contrast with the arid steppes. Livestock, especially sheep, camels, horses and cattle, is extensively bred by the nomads.
KHIVA, once an important kingdom in Asia, is now a much smaller khanate that relies on Russia, located in the delta of the Amu-darya (Oxus). Its border follows the left bank of the Amu from 40° 15′ N. down its left branch to Lake Aral; then, for about 40 miles along the southern coast of Lake Aral, and finally southward along the edge of the Ust-Urt plateau. The Transcaspian region of Russia is separated from Khiva by a line running nearly W.N.W.-E.S.E. at just below 40° 30′ N., extending from the Uzboi depression to the Amu-darya. The khanate spans 200 miles from north to south and has a maximum width of 300 miles. The area of the Khiva oasis is 5,210 square miles, while the steppe area is estimated to be around 17,000 square miles. The oasis population is estimated at 400,000, with another 400,000 (nomadic) in the steppes. Water from the Amu is channeled through various irrigation canals to the oasis, aided by the general slope of the land towards the west, which makes irrigation easier. Several old riverbeds of the Amu cut through the territory. The Amu's water, along with the thin layer of silt it leaves behind, makes the oasis very fertile. Crops like millet, rice, wheat, barley, oats, peas, flax, hemp, madder, and all kinds of vegetables and fruits (especially melons) are cultivated, along with vineyards and cotton. The whitewashed houses scattered among the elms and poplars, surrounded by lush fields, create a striking contrast to the dry steppes. Nomads extensively raise livestock, particularly sheep, camels, horses, and cattle.
The population is composed of four divisions: Uzbegs (150,000 to 200,000), the dominating race among the settled inhabitants of the oasis, from whom the officials are recruited; Sarts and Tajiks, agriculturists and tradespeople of mixed race; Turkomans (c. 170,000), who live in the steppes, south and west of the oasis, and formerly plundered the settled inhabitants by their raids; and the Kara-kalpaks, or Black Bonnets, a Turki tribe some 50,000 in number. They live south of Lake Aral, and in the towns of Kungrad, Khodsheili and Kipchak form the prevailing element. They cultivate the soil, breed cattle, and their women make carpets. There are also about 10,000 Kirghiz, and when the Russians took Khiva in 1873 there were 29,300 Persian slaves, stolen by Turkoman raiders, and over 6500 liberated slaves, mostly Kizil-bashes. The former were set free and the slave trade abolished. Of domestic industries, the embroidering of cloth, silks and leather is worthy of notice. The trade of Khiva is considerable: cotton, wool, rough woollen cloth and silk cocoons are exported to Russia, and various animal products to Bokhara. Cottons, velveteen, hardware and pepper are imported from Russia, and silks, cotton, china and tea from Bokhara. Khivan merchants habitually attend the Orenburg and Nizhniy-Novgorod fairs.
The population consists of four groups: Uzbegs (150,000 to 200,000), the dominant race among the settled residents of the oasis, from whom officials are chosen; Sarts and Tajiks, farmers and merchants of mixed descent; Turkomans (around 170,000), who live in the steppes to the south and west of the oasis and previously raided the settled people; and the Kara-kalpaks, or Black Bonnets, a Turkic tribe with about 50,000 members. They reside south of Lake Aral, and in the towns of Kungrad, Khodsheili, and Kipchak, they are the main population. They farm the land, raise livestock, and their women make carpets. There are also about 10,000 Kirghiz, and when the Russians captured Khiva in 1873, there were 29,300 Persian slaves, taken by Turkoman raiders, and over 6,500 freed slaves, mostly Kizil-bashes. The former were released, and the slave trade was ended. Among local industries, the embroidery of cloth, silks, and leather is notable. Khiva has significant trade: cotton, wool, coarse woolen fabric, and silk cocoons are exported to Russia, while various animal products are sent to Bokhara. Goods such as cotton, velveteen, hardware, and pepper are imported from Russia, and silks, cotton, china, and tea come from Bokhara. Khivan merchants regularly participate in the Orenburg and Nizhniy-Novgorod fairs.
History.—The present khanate is only a meagre relic of the great kingdom which under the name of Chorasmia, Kharezm (Khwārizm) and Urgenj (Jurjānīya, Gurganj) held the keys of the mightiest river in Central Asia. Its possession has consequently been much disputed from early times, but the country has undergone great changes, geographical as well as political, which have lessened its importance. The Oxus (Amu-darya) has changed its outlet, and no longer forms a water-way to the Caspian and thence to Europe, while Khiva is entirely surrounded by territory either directly administered or protected by Russia.
History.—The current khanate is just a small remnant of the great kingdom known as Chorasmia, Kharezm (Khwārizm), and Urgenj (Jurjānīya, Gurganj), which controlled the keys to the most powerful river in Central Asia. Throughout history, its control has been fiercely contested, but the region has experienced significant geographical and political changes that have reduced its significance. The Oxus (Amu-darya) has shifted its course and no longer serves as a route to the Caspian and then to Europe, while Khiva is now completely surrounded by areas either directly governed or protected by Russia.
Chorasmia is mentioned by Herodotus, it being then one of the Persian provinces, over which Darius placed satraps, but nothing material of it is known till it was seized by the Arabs in A.D. 680. When the power of the caliphs declined the governor of the province probably became independent; but the first king known to history is Mamun-ibn-Mahommed in 995. Khwārizm fell under the power of Mahmud of Ghazni in 1017, and subsequently under that of the Seljuk Turks. In 1097 the governor Kutb-ud-din assumed the title of king, and one of his descendants, ‘Ala-ud-din-Mahommed, conquered Persia, and was the greatest prince in Central Asia when Jenghiz Khan appeared in 1219. Khiva was conquered again by Timur in 1379; and finally fell under the rule of the Uzbegs in 1512, who are still the dominant race under the protection of the Russians.
Chorasmia is mentioned by Herodotus as one of the Persian provinces, where Darius appointed governors, but not much is known about it until it was taken over by the Arabs in CE 680. When the caliphs' power weakened, the governor of the province likely became independent; however, the first king recognized in history is Mamun-ibn-Mahommed in 995. Khwārizm came under the control of Mahmud of Ghazni in 1017, and later the Seljuk Turks. In 1097, the governor Kutb-ud-din declared himself king, and one of his descendants, ‘Ala-ud-din-Mahommed, conquered Persia and was the most powerful ruler in Central Asia when Jenghiz Khan arrived in 1219. Khiva was conquered again by Timur in 1379 and eventually came under the rule of the Uzbegs in 1512, who still remain the dominant ethnic group with Russian support.
Russia established relations with Khiva in the 17th century. The Cossacks of the Yaik during their raids across the Caspian learnt of the existence of this rich territory and made more than one plundering expedition to the chief town Urgenj. In 1717 Peter the Great, having heard of the presence of auriferous sand in the bed of the Oxus, desiring also to “open mercantile relations with India through Turan” and to release from slavery some Russian subjects, sent a military force to Khiva. When within 100 miles of the capital they encountered the troops of the khan. The battle lasted three days, and ended in victory for the Russian arms. The Khivans, however, induced the victors to break up their army into small detachments and treacherously annihilated them in detail. It was not until the third decade of the 19th century that the attention of the Muscovite government was again directed to the khanate. In 1839 a force under General Perovsky moved from Orenburg across the Ust-Urt plateau to the Khivan frontiers, to occupy the khanate, liberate the captives and open the way for trade. This expedition likewise terminated in disaster. In 1847 the Russians founded a fort at the mouth of the Jaxartes or Syr-darya. This advance deprived the Khivans not only of territory, but of a large number of tax-paying Kirghiz, and also gave the Russians a base for further operations. For the next few years, however, the attention of the Russians was taken up with Khokand, their operations on that side culminating in the capture of Tashkent in 1865. Free in this quarter, they directed their thoughts once more to Khiva. In 1869 Krasnovodsk on the east shore of the Caspian was founded, and in 1871-1872 the country leading to Khiva from different parts of Russian Turkestan was thoroughly explored and surveyed. In 1873 an expedition to Khiva was carefully organized on a large scale. The army of 10,000 men placed at the disposal of General Kaufmann started from three different bases of operation—Krasnovodsk, Orenburg and Tashkent. Khiva was occupied almost without opposition. All the territory (35,700 sq. m. and 110,000 souls) on the right bank of the Oxus was annexed to Russia, while a heavy war indemnity was imposed upon the khanate. The Russians thereby so crippled the finances of the state that the khan is in complete subjection to his more powerful neighbour.
Russia established relations with Khiva in the 17th century. The Cossacks from the Yaik, during their raids across the Caspian, learned about this rich territory and launched multiple plundering expeditions to the main city, Urgenj. In 1717, Peter the Great, having heard about gold-bearing sand in the Oxus River, aimed to “establish trade relations with India through Turan” and free some Russian subjects from slavery. He sent a military force to Khiva. When they were about 100 miles from the capital, they encountered the khan's troops. The battle lasted three days, and ended with a Russian victory. However, the Khivans persuaded the victors to break up their army into smaller groups and then ambushed and destroyed them one by one. It wasn’t until the 1830s that the Muscovite government focused on the khanate again. In 1839, a force led by General Perovsky moved from Orenburg across the Ust-Urt plateau towards the Khivan borders to take control of the khanate, free the captives, and create trade routes. This expedition also ended in disaster. In 1847, the Russians set up a fort at the mouth of the Jaxartes or Syr-darya River. This move not only stripped the Khivans of territory but also of many tax-paying Kirghiz and provided the Russians with a base for future operations. For the next few years, however, the Russians focused on Khokand, culminating in the capture of Tashkent in 1865. Free in that region, they turned their attention back to Khiva. In 1869, Krasnovodsk was established on the eastern shore of the Caspian Sea, and in 1871-1872, the area leading to Khiva from various parts of Russian Turkestan was thoroughly explored and mapped. In 1873, a major expedition to Khiva was carefully organized. An army of 10,000 men, under General Kaufmann, began from three different bases: Krasnovodsk, Orenburg, and Tashkent. Khiva was taken with little opposition. All the territory (35,700 square miles and 110,000 people) on the right bank of the Oxus was annexed to Russia, and a heavy war indemnity was imposed on the khanate. The Russians severely weakened the khanate's finances, leaving the khan completely subordinate to his stronger neighbor.

KHIVA, capital of the khanate of Khiva, in Western Asia, 25 m. W. of the Amu-darya and 240 m. W.N.W. of Bokhara. Pop. about 10,000. It is surrounded by a low earthen wall, and has a citadel, the residence of the khan and the higher officials. There are a score of mosques, of which the one containing the tomb of Polvan, the patron saint of Khiva, is the best, and four large madrasas (Mahommedan colleges). Large gardens exist in the western part of the town. A small Russian quarter has grown up. The inhabitants make carpets, silks and cottons.
KHIVA,, the capital of the khanate of Khiva in Western Asia, is located 25 miles west of the Amu-darya and 240 miles west-northwest of Bokhara. The population is around 10,000. It is surrounded by a low earthen wall and features a citadel, which serves as the residence of the khan and senior officials. There are about twenty mosques, with the one housing the tomb of Polvan, the patron saint of Khiva, being the most notable, along with four large madrasas (Islamic colleges). The western part of the town has large gardens. A small Russian neighborhood has developed. The locals produce carpets, silks, and cottons.

KHNOPFF, FERNAND EDMOND JEAN MARIE (1858- ), Belgian painter and etcher, was born at the château de Grembergen (Termonde), on the 12th of September 1858, and studied under X. Mellery. He developed a very original talent, his work being characterized by great delicacy of colour, tone and harmony, as subtle in spiritual and intellectual as in its material qualities. “A Crisis” (1881) was followed by “Listening to Schumann,” “St Anthony” and “The Queen of Sheba” (1883), and then came one of his best known works, “The Small Sphinx” (1884). His “Memories” (1889) and “White, Black and Gold” (1901) are in the Brussels Museum; “Portrait of Mlle R.” (1889) in the Venice Museum; “A Stream at Fosset” (1897) at Budapest Museum; “The Empress” (1899) in the collection of the emperor of Austria, and “A Musician” in that of the king of the Belgians. “I lock my Door upon Myself” (1891), which was exhibited at the New Gallery, London, in 1902 and there attracted much attention, was acquired by the Pinakothek at Munich. Other works are “Silence” (1890), “The Idea of Justice” (1905) and “Isolde” (1906), together with a polychrome bust “Sibyl” (1894) and an ivory mask (1897). In quiet intensity of feeling Khnopff was influenced by Rossetti, and in simplicity of line by Burne-Jones, but the poetry and the delicately mystic and enigmatic note of his work are entirely individual. He did good work also as an etcher and dry-pointist.
KHNOPFF, FERNAND EDMOND JEAN MARIE (1858- ), Belgian painter and etcher, was born at the château de Grembergen (Termonde) on September 12, 1858, and studied under X. Mellery. He developed a unique talent, with his work known for its delicate use of color, tone, and harmony, which were as subtle in their spiritual and intellectual qualities as they were in their material aspects. “A Crisis” (1881) was followed by “Listening to Schumann,” “St. Anthony,” and “The Queen of Sheba” (1883), and then came one of his most famous works, “The Small Sphinx” (1884). His pieces “Memories” (1889) and “White, Black and Gold” (1901) are in the Brussels Museum; “Portrait of Mlle R.” (1889) is in the Venice Museum; “A Stream at Fosset” (1897) is at the Budapest Museum; “The Empress” (1899) is in the collection of the Emperor of Austria, and “A Musician” is in that of the King of the Belgians. “I Lock My Door Upon Myself” (1891), which was displayed at the New Gallery in London in 1902 and received considerable attention, was acquired by the Pinakothek in Munich. Other works include “Silence” (1890), “The Idea of Justice” (1905), and “Isolde” (1906), along with a polychrome bust titled “Sibyl” (1894) and an ivory mask (1897). In the quiet intensity of his emotions, Khnopff was influenced by Rossetti, and in line simplicity by Burne-Jones, but the poetry and delicately mystic and enigmatic quality of his work are entirely his own. He also produced strong work as an etcher and dry-point artist.
See L. Dumont-Wilden, Fernand Khnopff (Brussels, 1907).
See L. Dumont-Wilden, Fernand Khnopff (Brussels, 1907).

KHOI, a district and town in the province of Azerbaijan, Persia, towards the extreme north-west frontier, between the Urmia Lake and the river Aras. The district contains many flourishing villages, and consists of an elevated plateau 60 m. by 10 to 15, highly cultivated by a skilful system of drainage and irrigation, producing fertile meadows, gardens and fields yielding rich crops of wheat and barley, cotton, rice and many kinds of fruit. In the northern part and bounding on Maku lies the plain of Chaldaran (Kalderan), where in August 1514 the Turks under Sultan Selim I. fought the Persians under Shah Ismail and gained a great victory.
KHOI, is a district and town in Azerbaijan, Persia, located on the far north-west frontier, between Lake Urmia and the Aras River. The district includes many thriving villages and is made up of an elevated plateau that stretches 60 miles by 10 to 15 miles, which is highly cultivated thanks to an effective system of drainage and irrigation. This area produces fertile meadows, gardens, and fields that yield abundant crops of wheat, barley, cotton, rice, and various types of fruit. In the northern part, adjacent to Maku, lies the plain of Chaldaran (Kalderan), where in August 1514, the Turks led by Sultan Selim I fought the Persians under Shah Ismail and achieved a significant victory.
The town of Khoi lies in 38° 37′ N., 45° 15′ E., 77 m. (90 by road) N.W. of Tabriz, at an elevation of 3300 ft., on the great trade route between Trebizond and Tabriz, and about 2 m. from the left bank of the Kotur Chai (river from Kotur) which is crossed there by a seven-arched bridge and is known lower down as the Kizil Chai, which flows into the Aras. The walled part of the town is a quadrilateral with faces of about 1200 yds. in length and fortifications consisting of two lines of bastions, ditches, &c., much out of repair. The population numbers about 35,000, a third living inside the walls. The Armenian quarter, with about 500 families and an old church, is outside the walls. The city within the walls forms one of the best laid out towns in 779 Persia, cool streams and lines of willows running along the broad and regular streets. There are some good buildings, including the governor’s residence, several mosques, a large brick bazaar and a fine caravanserai. There is a large transit trade, and considerable local traffic across the Turkish border. The city surrendered to the Russians in 1827 without fighting and after the treaty of peace (Turkman Chai, Feb. 1828) was held for some time by a garrison of 3000 Russian troops as a guarantee for the payment of the war indemnity. In September 1881 Khoi suffered much from a violent earthquake. It has post and telegraph offices.
The town of Khoi is located at 38° 37′ N., 45° 15′ E., 77 km (90 km by road) northwest of Tabriz, at an elevation of 3300 ft. It sits along the major trade route between Trebizond and Tabriz, about 2 km from the left bank of the Kotur Chai (river from Kotur), which is crossed by a seven-arched bridge and is referred to further downstream as the Kizil Chai, flowing into the Aras. The walled part of the town is shaped like a quadrilateral, with sides of about 1200 yards in length and fortifications that include two lines of bastions and ditches, though they are quite worn down. The population is around 35,000, with about a third living within the walls. The Armenian neighborhood, which has around 500 families and an old church, is located outside the walls. The city inside the walls is one of the best planned towns in 779 Persia, with cool streams and lines of willows along the wide, straight streets. There are several notable buildings, including the governor’s residence, multiple mosques, a large brick bazaar, and a beautiful caravanserai. The city handles a significant transit trade and has considerable local traffic crossing the Turkish border. It surrendered to the Russians in 1827 without a fight and was occupied by a garrison of 3000 Russian troops for a time after the peace treaty (Turkman Chai, Feb. 1828) as security for the payment of war reparations. In September 1881, Khoi experienced significant damage from a powerful earthquake. The town also has post and telegraph offices.

KHOJENT, or Khojend, a town of the province of Syr-darya, in Russian Turkestan, on the left bank of the Syr-darya or Jaxartes, 144 m. by rail S.S.E. from Tashkent, in 40° 17′ N. and 69° 30′ E., and on the direct road from Bokhara to Khokand. Pop. (1900), 31,881. The Russian quarter lies between the river and the native town. Near the river is the old citadel, on the top of an artificial square mound, about 100 ft. high. The banks of the river are so high as to make its water useless to the town in the absence of pumping gear. Formerly the entire commerce between the khanates of Bokhara and Khokand passed through this town, but since the Russian occupation (1866) much of it has been diverted. Silkworms are reared, and silk and cotton goods are manufactured. A coarse ware is made in imitation of Chinese porcelain. The district immediately around the town is taken up with cotton plantations, fruit gardens and vineyards. The majority of the inhabitants are Tajiks.
KHOJENT, or Khojend, a town in the Syr-darya province of Russian Turkestan, is located on the left bank of the Syr-darya or Jaxartes, 144 km by rail S.S.E. from Tashkent, at 40° 17′ N. and 69° 30′ E. It lies on the direct route from Bokhara to Khokand. Population (1900): 31,881. The Russian quarter is situated between the river and the native town. Near the river, there's an old citadel on top of an artificial square mound, about 100 ft. high. The banks of the river are so steep that without pumping equipment, its water is unusable for the town. Previously, all trade between the khanates of Bokhara and Khokand went through this town, but since the Russian occupation (1866), much of it has been rerouted. The area is home to silkworm farming, and silk and cotton goods are produced. There is also a coarse pottery made to mimic Chinese porcelain. The land surrounding the town is filled with cotton fields, fruit gardens, and vineyards. Most of the inhabitants are Tajiks.
Khojent has always been a bone of contention between Khokand and Bokhara. When the amir of Bokhara assisted Khudayar Khan to regain his throne in 1864, he kept possession of Khojent. In 1866 the town was stormed by the Russians; and during their war with Khokand in 1875 it played an important part.
Khojent has always been a point of conflict between Khokand and Bokhara. When the amir of Bokhara helped Khudayar Khan get his throne back in 1864, he took control of Khojent. In 1866, the Russians attacked the town, and during their war with Khokand in 1875, it was a significant location.

KHOKAND, or Kokan, a town of Asiatic Russia, in the province of Ferghana, on the railway from Samarkand to Andijan, 85 m. by rail S.W. of the latter, and 20 m. S. of the Syr-darya. Pop. (1900), 86,704. Situated at an altitude of 1375 ft., it has a severe climate, the average temperatures being—year, 56°; January, 22°; July, 65°. Yearly rainfall, 3.6 in. It is the centre of a fertile irrigated oasis, and consists of a citadel, enclosed by a wall nearly 12 m. in circuit, and of suburbs containing luxuriant gardens. The town is modernized, has broad streets and large squares, and a particularly handsome bazaar. The former palace of the khans, which recalls by its architecture the mosques of Samarkand, is the best building in the town. Khokand is one of the most important centres of trade in Turkestan. Raw cotton and silk are the principal exports, while manufactured goods are imported from Russia. Coins bearing the inscription “Khokand the Charming,” and known as khokands, have or had a wide currency.
KHOKAND, or Kokan, is a town in Central Asia, located in the Ferghana province of Russia, along the railway connecting Samarkand to Andijan, about 85 miles southwest of Andijan and 20 miles south of the Syr-darya River. Its population was 86,704 in 1900. Situated at an elevation of 1,375 feet, the town experiences a harsh climate, with average yearly temperatures around 56°F; January at 22°F; and July at 65°F. It receives about 3.6 inches of rainfall each year. Khokand is the hub of a fertile irrigated oasis and includes a citadel surrounded by a wall nearly 12 miles long, along with suburbs featuring lush gardens. The town has been modernized with wide streets and large squares, including a particularly impressive bazaar. The former palace of the khans, which resembles the mosques of Samarkand in its design, is the most notable building in the area. Khokand is one of the key trade centers in Turkestan, primarily exporting raw cotton and silk, while importing manufactured goods from Russia. Coins that say “Khokand the Charming,” known as khokands, used to be widely circulated.
The khanate of Khokand was a powerful state which grew up in the 18th century. Its early history is not well known, but the town was founded in 1732 by Abd-ur-Rahim under the name of Iski-kurgan, or Kali-i-Rahimbai. This must relate, however, to the fort only, because Arab travellers of the 10th century mention Hovakend or Hokand, the position of which has been identified with that of Khokand. Many other populous and wealthy towns existed in this region at the time of the Arab conquest of Ferghana. In 1758-1759 the Chinese conquered Dzungaria and East Turkestan, and the begs or rulers of Ferghana recognized Chinese suzerainty. In 1807 or 1808 Alim, son of Narbuta, brought all the begs of Ferghana under his authority, and conquered Tashkent and Chimkent. His attacks on the Bokharan fortress of Ura-tyube were however unsuccessful, and the country rose against him. He was killed in 1817 by the adherents of his brother Omar. Omar was a poet and patron of learning, but continued to enlarge his kingdom, taking the sacred town of Azret (Turkestan), and to protect Ferghana from the raids of the nomad Kirghiz built fortresses on the Syr-darya, which became a basis for raids of the Khokand people into Kirghiz land. This was the origin of a conflict with Russia. Several petty wars were undertaken by the Russians after 1847 to destroy the Khokand forts, and to secure possession, first, of the Ili (and so of Dzungaria), and next of the Syr-darya region, the result being that in 1866, after the occupation of Ura-tyube and Jizakh, the khanate of Khokand was separated from Bokhara. During the forty-five years after the death of Omar (he died in 1822) the khanate of Khokand was the seat of continuous wars between the settled Sarts and the nomad Kipchaks, the two parties securing the upper hand in turns, Khokand falling under the dominion or the suzerainty of Bokhara, which supported Khudayar-khan, the representative of the Kipchak party, in 1858-1866; while Alim-kul, the representative of the Sarts, put himself at the head of the gazawat (Holy War) proclaimed in 1860, and fought bravely against the Russians until killed at Tashkent in 1865. In 1868 Khudayar-khan, having secured independence from Bokhara, concluded a commercial treaty with the Russians, but was compelled to flee in 1875, when a new Holy War against Russia was proclaimed. It ended in the capture of the strong fort of Makhram, the occupation of Khokand and Marghelan (1875), and the recognition of Russian superiority by the amir of Bokhara, who conceded to Russia all the territory north of the Naryn river. War, however, was renewed in the following year. It ended, in February 1876, by the capture of Andijan and Khokand and the annexation of the Khokand khanate to Russia. Out of it was made the Russian province of Ferghana.
The khanate of Khokand was a strong state that emerged in the 18th century. Its early history isn't well documented, but the town was established in 1732 by Abd-ur-Rahim, who named it Iski-kurgan or Kali-i-Rahimbai. This likely refers only to the fort, as Arab travelers in the 10th century mentioned Hovakend or Hokand, which has been linked to Khokand's location. Many other vibrant and prosperous towns existed in this area at the time of the Arab conquest of Ferghana. Between 1758 and 1759, the Chinese conquered Dzungaria and East Turkestan, and the begs or rulers of Ferghana acknowledged Chinese authority. In 1807 or 1808, Alim, the son of Narbuta, unified all the begs of Ferghana under his control and conquered Tashkent and Chimkent. However, his attempts to attack the Bokharan fortress of Ura-tyube were unsuccessful, leading to a rebellion against him. He was killed in 1817 by supporters of his brother Omar. Omar was a poet and a patron of education, yet he continued to expand his kingdom, capturing the sacred town of Azret (Turkestan) and building fortresses on the Syr-darya to protect Ferghana from the raids of nomadic Kirghiz, which later facilitated Khokand's incursions into Kirghiz territories. This initiated a conflict with Russia. Several minor wars arose after 1847, aiming to eliminate the Khokand forts and secure possession of the Ili (and thus Dzungaria) and later the Syr-darya area. By 1866, following the occupation of Ura-tyube and Jizakh, the khanate of Khokand was separated from Bokhara. In the 45 years following Omar's death (he died in 1822), Khokand became a battleground between the settled Sarts and the nomadic Kipchaks, with each group gaining the upper hand at different times. Khokand fell under the control or influence of Bokhara, which supported Khudayar-khan, representing the Kipchak faction, between 1858 and 1866. Meanwhile, Alim-kul, representing the Sarts, led the gazawat (Holy War) declared in 1860 and fought valiantly against the Russians until he was killed in Tashkent in 1865. In 1868, Khudayar-khan secured independence from Bokhara and established a commercial treaty with the Russians, but had to flee in 1875 after a new Holy War against Russia was declared. This conflict resulted in the capture of the fortified region of Makhram, the occupation of Khokand and Marghelan (1875), and the acknowledgment of Russian dominance by the amir of Bokhara, who ceded all territory north of the Naryn River to Russia. However, war resumed in the following year, culminating in February 1876 with the capture of Andijan and Khokand, leading to the annexation of the Khokand khanate into Russia, which then became the Russian province of Ferghana.
Authorities.—The following publications are all in Russian: Kuhn, Sketch of the Khanate of Khokand (1876); V. Nalivkin, Short History of Khokand (French trans., Paris, 1889); Niazi Mohammed, Tarihi Shahrohi, or History of the Rulers of Ferghana, edited by Pantusov (Kazañ, 1885); Makshéev, Historical Sketch of Turkestan and the Advance of the Russians (St Petersburg, 1890); N. Petrovskiy, Old Arabian Journals of Travel (Tashkent, 1894); Russian Encyclopaedic Dictionary, vol. xv. (1895).
Officials.—The following publications are all in Russian: Kuhn, Sketch of the Khanate of Khokand (1876); V. Nalivkin, Short History of Khokand (French trans., Paris, 1889); Niazi Mohammed, Tarihi Shahrohi, or History of the Rulers of Ferghana, edited by Pantusov (Kazan, 1885); Makshéev, Historical Sketch of Turkestan and the Advance of the Russians (St. Petersburg, 1890); N. Petrovskiy, Old Arabian Journals of Travel (Tashkent, 1894); Russian Encyclopaedic Dictionary, vol. xv. (1895).


KHONDS, or Kandhs, an aboriginal tribe of India, inhabiting the tributary states of Orissa and the Ganjam district of Madras. At the census of 1901 they numbered 701,198. Their main divisions are into Kutia or hill Khonds and plain-dwelling Khonds; the landowners are known as Raj Khonds. Their religion is animistic, and their pantheon includes eighty-four gods. They have given their name to the Khondmals, a subdivision of Angul district in Orissa: area, 800 sq. m.; pop. (1901), 64,214. The Khond language, Kui, spoken in 1901 by more than half a million persons, is much more closely related to Telugu than is Gondi. The Khonds are a finer type than the Gonds. They are as tall as the average Hindu and not much darker, while in features they are very Aryan. They are undoubtedly a mixed Dravidian race, with much Aryan blood.
KHONDS, or Candies, are an indigenous tribe of India, living in the tributary states of Orissa and the Ganjam district of Madras. In the 1901 census, their population was 701,198. They are mainly divided into two groups: Kutia or hill Khonds and plain-dwelling Khonds; the landowners are referred to as Raj Khonds. Their religious beliefs are animistic, and their pantheon comprises eighty-four gods. They have given their name to the Khondmals, a subdivision of the Angul district in Orissa, which has an area of 800 sq. m. and a population of 64,214 as of 1901. The Khond language, Kui, was spoken in 1901 by over half a million people and is more closely related to Telugu than to Gondi. The Khonds are generally considered to be a finer type than the Gonds. They are about the same height as the average Hindu and have similar skin tones, while their features are very Aryan. They are undoubtedly a mixed Dravidian race, with a significant amount of Aryan ancestry.
The Khonds became notorious, on the British occupation of their district about 1835, from the prevalence and cruelty of the human sacrifices they practised. These “Meriah” sacrifices, as they were called, were intended to further the fertilization of the earth. It was incumbent on the Khonds to purchase their victims. Unless bought with a price they were not deemed acceptable. They seldom sacrificed Khonds, though in hard times Khonds were obliged to sell their children and they could then be purchased as Meriahs. Persons of any race, age or sex, were acceptable if purchased. Numbers were bought and kept and well treated; and Meriah women were encouraged to become mothers. Ten or twelve days before the sacrifice the victim’s hair was cut off, and the villagers having bathed, went with the priest to the sacred grove to forewarn the goddess. The festival lasted three days, and the wildest orgies were indulged in.
The Khonds became infamous after the British took over their area around 1835 because of the extreme and brutal human sacrifices they performed. These sacrifices, known as “Meriah,” were meant to enhance the fertility of the land. It was essential for the Khonds to buy their victims; unless they were purchased, they weren't considered valid sacrifices. They rarely sacrificed other Khonds, although in tough times, families sometimes had to sell their children, who could then be bought as Meriahs. People of any race, age, or gender were eligible if they were purchased. Many were bought and treated well, and Meriah women were encouraged to have children. Ten to twelve days before the sacrifice, the victim’s hair was cut off, and the villagers, after bathing, would go with the priest to the sacred grove to inform the goddess. The festival lasted three days, filled with wild celebrations.
See Major Macpherson, Religious Doctrines of the Khonds; his account of their religion in Jour. R. Asiatic Soc. xiii. 220-221 and his Report upon the Khonds of Ganjam and Cuttack (Calcutta, 1842); also District Gazetteer of Angul (Calcutta, 1908).
See Major Macpherson, Religious Doctrines of the Khonds; his account of their religion in Jour. R. Asiatic Soc. xiii. 220-221 and his Report on the Khonds of Ganjam and Cuttack (Calcutta, 1842); also District Gazetteer of Angul (Calcutta, 1908).

KHORASAN, or Khorassan (i.e. “land of the sun”), a geographical term originally applied to the eastern of the four 780 quarters (named from the cardinal points) into which the ancient monarchy of the Sassanians was divided. After the Arab conquest the name was retained both as the designation of a definite province and in a looser sense. Under the new Persian empire the expression has gradually become restricted to the north-eastern portion of Persia which forms one of the five great provinces of that country. The province is conterminous E. with Afghanistan, N. with Russian Transcaspian territory, W. with Astarabad and Shahrud-Bostam, and S. with Kerman and Yezd. It lies mainly within 29° 45′-38° 15′ N. and 56°-61° E., extending about 320 m. east and west and 570 m. north and south, with a total area of about 150,000 sq. m. The surface is mountainous. The ranges generally run in parallel ridges, inclosing extensive valleys, with a normal direction from N.W. to S.E. The whole of the north is occupied by an extensive highland system composed of a part of the Elburz and its continuation extending to the Paropamisus. This system, sometimes spoken of collectively as the Kuren Dagh, or Kopet Dagh from its chief sections, forms in the east three ranges, the Hazar Masjed, Binalud Kuh and Jagatai, enclosing the Meshed-Kuchan valley and the Jovain plain. The former is watered by the Kashaf-rud (Tortoise River), or river of Meshed, flowing east to the Hari-rud, their junction forming the Tejen, which sweeps round the Daman-i-Kuh, or northern skirt of the outer range, towards the Caspian but loses itself in the desert long before reaching it. The Jovain plain is watered by the Kali-i-mura, an unimportant river which flows south to the Great Kavir or central depression. In the west the northern highlands develop two branches: (1) the Kuren Dagh, stretching through the Great and Little Balkans to the Caspian at Krasnovodsk Bay, (2) the Ala Dagh, forming a continuation of the Binalud Kuh and joining the mountains between Bujnurd and Astarabad, which form part of the Elburz system. The Kuren Dagh and Ala Dagh enclose the valley of the Atrek River, which flows west and south-west into the Caspian at Hassan Kuli Bay. The western offshoots of the Ala Dagh in the north and the mountains of Astarabad in the south enclose the valley of the Gurgan River, which also flows westwards and parallel to the Atrek to the south-eastern corner of the Caspian. The outer range has probably a mean altitude of 8000 ft., the highest known summits being the Hazar Masjed (10,500) and the Kara Dagh (9800). The central range seems to be higher, culminating with the Shah-Jehan Kuh (11,000) and the Ala Dagh (11,500). The southern ridges, although generally much lower, have the highest point of the whole system in the Shah Kuh (13,000) between Shahrud and Astarabad. South of this northern highland several parallel ridges run diagonally across the province in a N.W.-S.E. direction as far as Seistan.
KHORASAN, or Khorasan (i.e. “land of the sun”), is a geographical term that was originally used to describe the eastern part of the four780 quarters into which the ancient Sassanian monarchy was divided. After the Arab conquest, the name continued to be used both for a specific province and in a broader sense. Under the new Persian empire, the term has gradually come to refer specifically to the north-eastern part of Persia, which is one of the five major provinces of that country. The province borders Afghanistan to the east, Russian Transcaspian territory to the north, Astarabad and Shahrud-Bostam to the west, and Kerman and Yezd to the south. It is located mainly between 29° 45′-38° 15′ N. and 56°-61° E., spanning about 320 miles east to west and 570 miles north to south, with a total area of around 150,000 square miles. The landscape is mountainous, with ranges generally running in parallel ridges that create extensive valleys, typically oriented from northwest to southeast. The entire northern area is dominated by a large highland system that includes a part of the Elburz mountains and extends to the Paropamisus. This system, sometimes referred to collectively as the Kuren Dagh or Kopet Dagh based on its main sections, features three ranges in the east: the Hazar Masjed, Binalud Kuh, and Jagatai, which enclose the Meshed-Kuchan valley and the Jovain plain. The Hazar Masjed is fed by the Kashaf-rud (Tortoise River), which flows east towards the Hari-rud. Their confluence forms the Tejen, which curves around the Daman-i-Kuh, or northern foothill of the outer range, heading toward the Caspian but disappearing into the desert long before reaching it. The Jovain plain receives water from the Kali-i-mura, a minor river that flows south into the Great Kavir or central depression. In the west, the northern highlands split into two branches: (1) the Kuren Dagh, stretching through the Great and Little Balkans to the Caspian at Krasnovodsk Bay, and (2) the Ala Dagh, which continues from the Binalud Kuh and connects with the mountains between Bujnurd and Astarabad, part of the Elburz system. The Kuren Dagh and Ala Dagh enclose the valley of the Atrek River, which flows west and southwest into the Caspian at Hassan Kuli Bay. The outer range probably has an average altitude of 8000 ft., with the highest known peaks being the Hazar Masjed (10,500 ft.) and the Kara Dagh (9800 ft.). The central range seems to be taller, with its highest points being the Shah-Jehan Kuh (11,000 ft.) and the Ala Dagh (11,500 ft.). The southern ridges, while generally much lower, contain the highest point of the entire system, the Shah Kuh (13,000 ft.), located between Shahrud and Astarabad. To the south of this northern highland, several parallel ridges run diagonally across the province in a north-west to south-east direction all the way to Seistan.
Beyond the Atrek and other rivers watering the northern valleys a few brackish and intermittent rivers lose themselves in the Great Kavir, which occupies the central and western parts of the province. The true character of the kavir, which forms the distinctive feature of east Persia, has scarcely been determined, some regarding it as the bed of a dried-up sea, others as developed by the saline streams draining to it from the surrounding highlands. Collecting in the central depressions, which have a mean elevation of scarcely more than 500 ft. above the Caspian, the water of these streams is supposed to form saline deposits with a thin hard crust, beneath which the moisture is retained for a considerable time, thus producing those dangerous and slimy quagmires which in winter are covered with brine, in summer with a treacherous incrustation of salt. Dr Sven Hedin explored the central depressions in 1906.
Beyond the Atrek and other rivers that water the northern valleys, a few brackish and intermittent rivers fade into the Great Kavir, which covers the central and western parts of the province. The true nature of the kavir, a defining feature of eastern Persia, hasn't been fully understood; some see it as the bed of a long-gone sea, while others view it as formed by the salty streams flowing into it from the surrounding highlands. Water from these streams collects in the central low areas, which are only about 500 feet above sea level at the Caspian, and is thought to create saline deposits with a thin, hard crust. Below this crust, moisture is held for a long time, creating dangerous and slimy marshes that are covered with brine in winter and a deceptive layer of salt in summer. Dr. Sven Hedin explored these central depressions in 1906.
The surface of Khorasan thus consists mainly of highlands, saline, swampy deserts and upland valleys, some fertile and well-watered. Of the last, occurring mainly in the north, the chief are the longitudinal valley stretching from near the Herat frontier through Meshed, Kuchan and Shirvan to Bujnurd, the Derrehgez district, which lies on the northern skirt of the outer range projecting into the Akhal Tekkeh domain, now Russian territory, and the districts of Nishapur and Sabzevar which lie south of the Binalud and Jagatai ranges. These fertile tracts produce rice and other cereals, cotton, tobacco, opium and fruits in profusion. Other products are manna, suffron, asafoetida and other gums. The chief manufactures are swords, stoneware, carpets and rugs, woollens, cottons, silks and sheepskin pelisses (pustin, Afghan poshtin).
The landscape of Khorasan primarily features highlands, salty and marshy deserts, and upland valleys, some of which are fertile and well-irrigated. The most notable of these fertile areas, found mainly in the north, include the long valley that runs from near the Herat border through Meshed, Kuchan, and Shirvan to Bujnurd; the Derrehgez district, located on the northern edge of the outer range extending into the Akhal Tekkeh region, which is now Russian territory; and the districts of Nishapur and Sabzevar, situated south of the Binalud and Jagatai ranges. These fertile regions produce an abundance of rice and other grains, cotton, tobacco, opium, and various fruits. Additional products include manna, saffron, asafoetida, and other gums. The main manufactured goods are swords, stoneware, carpets and rugs, woolens, cottons, silks, and sheepskin coats (pustin, Afghan poshtin).
The administrative divisions of the province are: 1, Nishapur; 2, Sabzevar; 3, Jovain; 4, Asfarain; 5, Bujnurd; 6, Kuchan; 7, Derrehgez; 8, Kelat; 9, Chinaran; 10, Meshed; 11, Jam; 12, Bakharz; 13, Radkan; 14, Serrakhs; 15, Sar-i-jam; 16, Bam and Safiabad; 17, Turbet i Haidari; 18, Turshiz; 19, Khaf; 20, Tun and Tabbas; 21, Kain; 22, Seistan.
The administrative divisions of the province are: 1. Nishapur; 2. Sabzevar; 3. Jovain; 4. Asfarain; 5. Bujnurd; 6. Kuchan; 7. Derrehgez; 8. Kelat; 9. Chinaran; 10. Meshed; 11. Jam; 12. Bakharz; 13. Radkan; 14. Serrakhs; 15. Sar-i-jam; 16. Bam and Safiabad; 17. Turbet i Haidari; 18. Turshiz; 19. Khaf; 20. Tun and Tabbas; 21. Kain; 22. Seistan.
The population consists of Iranians (Tajiks, Kurds, Baluchis), Mongols, Tatars and Arabs, and is estimated at about a million. The Persians proper have always represented the settled, industrial and trading elements, and to them the Kurds and the Arabs have become largely assimilated. Even many of the original Tatar, Mongol and other nomad tribes (ilat), instead of leading their former roving and unsettled life of the sahara-nishin (dwellers in the desert), are settled and peaceful shahr-nishin (dwellers in towns). In religion all except some Tatars and Mongols and the Baluchis have conformed to the national Shiah faith. The revenues (cash and kind) of the province amount to about £180,000 a year, but very little of this amount reaches the Teheran treasury. The value of the exports and imports from and into the whole province is a little under a million sterling a year. The province produces about 10,000 tons of wool and a third of this quantity, or rather more, valued at £70,000 to £80,000, is exported via Russia to the markets of western Europe, notably to Marseilles, Russia keeping only a small part. Other important articles of export, all to Russia, are cotton, carpets, shawls and turquoises, the last from the mines near Nishapur.
The population includes Iranians (Tajiks, Kurds, Baluchis), Mongols, Tatars, and Arabs, and is estimated at around a million. The Persians have always represented the settled, industrial, and trading groups, and many Kurds and Arabs have largely blended in with them. Even a number of the original Tatar, Mongol, and other nomadic tribes (ilat) have shifted from their former wandering lifestyle as sahara-nishin (desert dwellers) to become settled and peaceful shahr-nishin (town dwellers). In terms of religion, everyone except for some Tatars, Mongols, and Baluchis has adopted the national Shiah faith. The province's revenues (cash and in-kind) add up to about £180,000 a year, but very little of this actually makes it to the Tehran treasury. The total value of exports and imports for the entire province is just under a million sterling a year. The province produces around 10,000 tons of wool, with about a third of this amount, or slightly more, valued at £70,000 to £80,000, being exported via Russia to markets in western Europe, especially Marseilles, with Russia keeping only a small portion. Other key exports, all heading to Russia, include cotton, carpets, shawls, and turquoises, the latter sourced from mines near Nishapur.

KHORREMABAD, a town of Persia, capital of the province of Luristan, in 33° 32′ N., 48° 15′ E., and at an elevation of 4250 ft. Pop. about 6000. It is situated 138 m. W.N.W. of Isfahan and 117 m. S.E. of Kermanshah, on the right bank of the broad but shallow Khorremabad river, also called Ab-i-istaneh, and, lower down, Kashgan Rud. On an isolated rock between the town and the river stands a ruined castle, the Diz-i-siyah (black castle), the residence of the governor of the district (then called Samha) in the middle ages, and, with some modern additions, one of them consisting of rooms on the summit, called Felek ul aflak (heaven of heavens), the residence of the governors of Luristan in the beginning of the 19th century. At the foot of the castle stands the modern residence of the governor, built c. 1830, with several spacious courts and gardens. On the left bank of the river opposite the town are the ruins of the old city of Samha. There are a minaret 60 ft. high, parts of a mosque, an aqueduct, a number of walls of other buildings and a four-sided monolith, measuring 9½ ft. in height, by 3 ft. long and 21⁄3 broad, with an inscription partly illegible, commemorating Mahmud, a grandson of the Seljuk king Malik Shah, and dated A.H. 517, or 519 (A.D. 1148-1150). There also remain ten arches of a bridge which led over the river from Samha on to the road to Shapurkhast, a city situated some distance west.
KHORREMABAD, is a town in Persia, the capital of the Luristan province, located at 33° 32′ N., 48° 15′ E., and sits at an elevation of 4250 ft. It has a population of about 6000. The town is 138 miles W.N.W. of Isfahan and 117 miles S.E. of Kermanshah, on the right bank of the broad but shallow Khorremabad river, also known as Ab-i-istaneh, and further downstream, Kashgan Rud. Between the town and the river, there's a ruined castle on an isolated rock, called the Diz-i-siyah (black castle), which was the residence of the district governor (then known as Samha) during the middle ages. The castle features some modern additions, including rooms at the top known as Felek ul aflak (heaven of heavens), which served as the residence for the governors of Luristan in the early 19th century. At the base of the castle is the modern governor's residence, built around 1830, which includes several spacious courtyards and gardens. Across the river from the town on the left bank are the ruins of the old city of Samha. There is a minaret that is 60 ft. tall, remnants of a mosque, an aqueduct, various wall sections from other buildings, and a four-sided monolith measuring 9½ ft. high, 3 ft. long, and 2¼ ft. wide, with a partly illegible inscription honoring Mahmud, a grandson of the Seljuk king Malik Shah, dated A.H. 517 or 519 (A.D. 1148-1150). Additionally, there are ten arches remaining from a bridge that once connected Samha to the road leading to Shapurkhast, a city located some distance to the west.

KHORSABAD, a Turkish village in the vilayet of Mosul, 12½ m. N.E. of that town, and almost 20 m. N. of ancient Nineveh, on the left bank of the little river Kosar. Here, in 1843, P. E. Botta, then French consul at Mosul, discovered the remains of an Assyrian palace and town, at which excavations were conducted by him and Flandin in 1843-1844, and again by Victor Place in 1851-1855. The ruins proved to be those of the town of Dur-Sharrukin, “Sargon’s Castle,” built by Sargon, king of Assyria, as a royal residence. The town, in the shape of a rectangular parallelogram, with the corners pointing approximately toward the cardinal points of the compass, covered 741 acres of ground. On the north-west side, half within and half without the circuit of the walls, protruding into the plain like a great bastion, stood the royal palace, on a terrace, 45 ft. in height, covering about 25 acres. The palace proper was divided into three sections, built around three sides of a large court on the south-east or city side, into which opened the great outer gates, guarded by winged stone bulls, each section containing suites of rooms built around several smaller inner courts. In the centre was the serai, occupied by the king and his retinue, with an extension towards the north, opening on a large inner court, containing the public reception rooms, elaborately decorated with 781 sculptures and historical inscriptions, representing scenes of hunting, worship, feasts, battles, and the like. The harem, with separate provisions for four wives, occupied the south corner, the domestic quarters, including stables, kitchen, bakery, wine cellar, &c., being at the east corner, to the north-east of the great entrance court. In the west corner stood a temple, with a stage-tower (ziggurat) adjoining. The walls of the rooms, which stood only to the height of one storey, were from 9 to 25 ft. in thickness, of clay, faced with brick, in the reception rooms wainscoted with stone slabs or tiles, elsewhere plastered, or, in the harem, adorned with fresco paintings and arabesques. Here and there the floors were formed of tiles or alabaster blocks, but in general they were of stamped clay, on which were spread at the time of occupancy mats and rugs. The exterior of the palace wall exhibited a system of groups of half columns and stepped recesses, an ornament familiar in Babylonian architecture. The palace and city were completed in 707 B.C., and in 706 Sargon took up his residence there. He died the following year, and palace and city seem to have been abandoned shortly thereafter. Up to 1909 this was the only Assyrian palace which had ever been explored systematically, in its entirety, and fortunately it was found on the whole in an admirable state of preservation. An immense number of statues and bas-reliefs, excavated by Botta, were transported to Paris, and formed the first Assyrian museum opened to the world. The objects excavated by Place, together with the objects found by Fresnel’s expedition in Babylonia and a part of the results of Rawlinson’s excavations at Nineveh, were unfortunately lost in the Tigris, on transport from Bagdad to Basra. Flandin had, however, made careful drawings and copies of all objects of importance from Khorsabad. The whole material was published by the French government in two monumental publications.
KHORSABAD, is a Turkish village in the Mosul province, located 12½ miles northeast of that town and nearly 20 miles north of the ancient city of Nineveh, situated on the left bank of the small river Kosar. In 1843, P. E. Botta, who was the French consul at Mosul, uncovered the remains of an Assyrian palace and town, which were excavated by him and Flandin in 1843-1844, and later by Victor Place from 1851 to 1855. The ruins turned out to be from the town of Dur-Sharrukin, “Sargon’s Castle,” constructed by Sargon, the king of Assyria, as a royal residence. The town was shaped like a rectangular parallelogram, with corners generally pointing towards the cardinal directions, covering 741 acres. On the northwest side, partially inside and outside the walls, jutted out the royal palace, built on a 45-foot high terrace, covering about 25 acres. The palace itself was organized into three sections around three sides of a large courtyard on the southeast or city side, where the grand outer gates opened, guarded by winged stone bulls. Each section contained suites of rooms organized around several smaller inner courts. In the center was the serai, where the king and his entourage resided, with an extension towards the north leading to a large inner court that had public reception rooms, richly decorated with 781 sculptures and historical inscriptions depicting scenes of hunting, worship, feasting, battles, and more. The harem, which had separate accommodations for four wives, was located in the southern corner, while the domestic quarters including stables, kitchen, bakery, wine cellar, etc., were situated in the eastern corner, northeast of the grand entrance court. The western corner housed a temple, attached to a stage tower (ziggurat). The walls of the rooms, which were only one story high, measured between 9 to 25 feet thick, made of clay, faced with brick, and the reception rooms were wainscoted with stone slabs or tiles; elsewhere they were plastered, or in the harem, decorated with frescoes and arabesques. The floors were sometimes made of tiles or alabaster blocks, but generally were stamped clay, covered during occupation with mats and rugs. The outer wall of the palace displayed a series of groups of half-columns and stepped recesses, an ornament typical in Babylonian architecture. The palace and city were finished in 707 BCE, and Sargon moved in the following year. He died the year after, and it appears the palace and city were abandoned shortly after that. Up until 1909, this was the only Assyrian palace that had been systematically explored in its entirety, and it was fortunately found to be in remarkable condition. A vast quantity of statues and bas-reliefs excavated by Botta were transported to Paris, forming the first Assyrian museum opened to the public. The items excavated by Place, along with those discovered by Fresnel’s expedition in Babylonia and some results from Rawlinson’s excavations at Nineveh, were regrettably lost in the Tigris while being transported from Baghdad to Basra. However, Flandin had made meticulous drawings and copies of all significant objects from Khorsabad. The entire collection was published by the French government in two monumental publications.
See P. E. Botta and E. Flandin, Monument de Ninive (Paris, 1849-1850; 5 vols. 400 plates); Victor Place, Ninïve et l’Assyrie, avec des essais de restauration par F. Thomas (Paris, 1866-1869; 3 vols.).
See P. E. Botta and E. Flandin, Monument de Ninive (Paris, 1849-1850; 5 vols. 400 plates); Victor Place, Ninïve et l’Assyrie, avec des essais de restauration par F. Thomas (Paris, 1866-1869; 3 vols.).

KHOTAN (locally Ilchi), a town and oasis of East Turkestan, on the Khotan-darya, between the N. foot of the Kuen-lun and the edge of the Takla-makan desert, nearly 200 m. by caravan road S.E. from Yarkand. Pop., about 5000. The town consists of a labyrinth of narrow, winding, dirty streets, with poor, square, flat-roofed houses, half a dozen madrasas (Mahommedan colleges), a score of mosques, and some masars (tombs of Mahommedan saints). Dotted about the town are open squares, with tanks or ponds overhung by trees. For centuries Khotan was famous for jade or nephrite, a semi-precious stone greatly esteemed by the Chinese for making small fancy boxes, bottles and cups, mouthpieces for pipes, bracelets, &c. The stone is still exported to China. Other local products are carpets (silk and felt), silk goods, hides, grapes, rice and other cereals, fruits, tobacco, opium and cotton. There is an active trade in these goods and in wool with India, West Turkestan and China. The oasis contains two small towns, Kara-kash and Yurun-kash, and over 300 villages, its total population being about 150,000.
KHOTAN (locally Ilchi) is a town and oasis in East Turkestan, located on the Khotan River, positioned between the northern foothills of the Kuen Lun mountains and the edge of the Takla Makan desert, nearly 200 miles southeast of Yarkand. The population is around 5,000. The town features a maze of narrow, winding, dirty streets filled with simple, square, flat-roofed houses, several madrasas (Islamic colleges), numerous mosques, and a few masars (tombs of Islamic saints). Scattered throughout the town are open squares with tanks or ponds shaded by trees. For centuries, Khotan was known for jade or nephrite, a semi-precious stone highly valued by the Chinese for crafting small decorative boxes, bottles, cups, mouthpieces for pipes, bracelets, and more. The stone continues to be exported to China. Other local products include carpets (both silk and felt), silk goods, hides, grapes, rice and other grains, fruits, tobacco, opium, and cotton. There is a vibrant trade in these goods and wool with India, West Turkestan, and China. The oasis is home to two small towns, Kara-kash and Yurun-kash, and over 300 villages, with a total population of about 150,000.
Khotan, known in Sanskrit as Kustana and in Chinese as Yu-than, Yu-tien, Kiu-sa-tan-na, and Khio-tan, is mentioned in Chinese chronicles in the 2nd century B.C. In A.D. 73 it was conquered by the Chinese, and ever since has been generally dependent upon the Chinese empire. During the early centuries of the Christian era, and long before that, it was an important and flourishing place, the capital of a kingdom to which the Chinese sent embassies, and famous for its glass-wares, copper tankards and textiles. About the year A.D. 400 it was a city of some magnificence, and the seat of a flourishing cult of Buddha, with temples rich in paintings and ornaments of the precious metals; but from the 5th century it seems to have declined. In the 8th century it was conquered, after a struggle of 25 years, by the Arab chieftain Kotaiba ibn Moslim, from West Turkestan, who imposed Islam upon the people. In 1220 Khotan was destroyed by the Mongols under Jenghiz Khan. Marco Polo, who passed through the town in 1274, says that “Everything is to be had there [at Cotan, i.e. Khotan] in plenty, including abundance of cotton, with flax, hemp, wheat, wine, and the like. The people have vineyards and gardens and estates. They live by commerce and manufactures, and are no soldiers.”1 The place suffered severely during the Dungan revolt against China in 1864-1875, and again a few years later when Yakub Beg of Kashgar made himself master of East Turkestan.
Khotan, called Kustana in Sanskrit and Yu-than, Yu-tien, Kiu-sa-tan-na, and Khio-tan in Chinese, is referenced in Chinese records from the 2nd century B.C. It was taken over by the Chinese in A.D. 73 and has generally been dependent on the Chinese empire since then. During the early centuries of the Christian era, and long before that, it was a significant and thriving city, serving as the capital of a kingdom to which the Chinese sent envoys, and was well-known for its glassware, copper tankards, and textiles. Around A.D. 400, it was a city of considerable splendor, home to a vibrant Buddhist community with temples adorned with paintings and precious metal decorations; however, it appears to have declined from the 5th century onward. In the 8th century, it was conquered after a 25-year battle by the Arab leader Kotaiba ibn Moslim from West Turkestan, who introduced Islam to the region. In 1220, Khotan was destroyed by the Mongols led by Genghis Khan. Marco Polo, who visited the city in 1274, noted that “Everything is available there [at Cotan, i.e. Khotan] in abundance, including plenty of cotton, flax, hemp, wheat, wine, and similar products. The people have vineyards, gardens, and estates. They rely on trade and manufacturing, and they are not soldiers.” The area suffered greatly during the Dungan revolt against China from 1864 to 1875, and again a few years later when Yakub Beg of Kashgar took control of East Turkestan.
The Khotan-darya rises in the Kuen-lun Mountains in two headstreams, the Kara-kash and the Yurun-kash, which unite towards the middle of the desert, some 90 m. N. of the town of Khotan. The conjoint stream then flows 180 m. northwards across the desert of Takla-makan, though it carries water only in the early summer, and empties itself into the Tarim a few miles below the confluence of the Ak-su with the Yarkand-darya (Tarim). In crossing the desert it falls 1250 ft. in a distance of 270 m. Its total length is about 300 m. and the area it drains probably nearly 40,000 sq. m.
The Khotan River starts in the Kuen-lun Mountains from two main streams, the Kara-kash and the Yurun-kash, which merge in the middle of the desert, around 90 miles north of the town of Khotan. The combined river then flows 180 miles north across the Takla-makan desert, but it only has water in early summer and eventually flows into the Tarim a few miles downstream from where the Ak-su meets the Yarkand-darya (Tarim). As it crosses the desert, it drops 1250 feet over a distance of 270 miles. Its total length is about 300 miles, and the area it drains is likely around 40,000 square miles.
See J. P. A. Rémusat, Histoire de la ville de Khotan (Paris, 1820); and Sven Hedin, Through Asia (Eng. trans., London, 1898), chs. lx. and lxii., and Scientific Results of a Journey in Central Asia, 1899-1902, vol. ii. (Stockholm, 1906).
See J. P. A. Rémusat, Histoire de la ville de Khotan (Paris, 1820); and Sven Hedin, Through Asia (Eng. trans., London, 1898), chs. lx. and lxii., and Scientific Results of a Journey in Central Asia, 1899-1902, vol. ii. (Stockholm, 1906).

KHOTIN, or Khoteen (variously written Khochim, Choczim, and Chocim), a fortified town of South Russia, in the government of Bessarabia, in 48° 30′ N. and 26° 30′ E., on the right bank of the Dniester, near the Austrian (Galician) frontier, and opposite Podolian Kamenets. Pop. (1897), 18,126. It possesses a few manufactures (leather, candles, beer, shoes, bricks), and carries on a considerable trade, but has always been of importance mainly as a military post, defending one of the most frequented passages of the Dniester. In the middle ages it was the seat of a Genoese colony; and it has been in Polish, Turkish and Austrian possession. The chief events in its annals are the defeat of the Turks in 1621 by Ladislaus IV., of Poland, in 1673 by John Sobieski, of Poland, and in 1739 by the Russians under Münnich; the defeat of the Russians by the Turks in 1768; the capture by the Russians in 1769, and by the Austrians in 1788; and the occupation by the Russians in 1806. It finally passed to Russia with Bessarabia in 1812 by the peace of Bucharest.
KHOTIN, or Khoteen (also spelled Khochim, Choczim, and Chocim) is a fortified town in South Russia, located in the Bessarabia region at 48° 30′ N. and 26° 30′ E., on the right bank of the Dniester River, near the Austrian (Galician) border, and across from Podolian Kamenets. Population (1897) was 18,126. The town has some manufacturing (leather, candles, beer, shoes, bricks) and engages in significant trade, but it has always been primarily important as a military post, protecting one of the busiest crossings of the Dniester. In the medieval period, it was home to a Genoese colony and has been under Polish, Turkish, and Austrian control. Key events in its history include the defeat of the Turks in 1621 by Ladislaus IV of Poland, in 1673 by John Sobieski of Poland, and in 1739 by the Russians led by Münnich; the defeat of the Russians by the Turks in 1768; its capture by the Russians in 1769, and by the Austrians in 1788; and the Russian occupation in 1806. It finally became part of Russia along with Bessarabia in 1812 through the peace of Bucharest.

KHULNA, a town and district of British India, in the Presidency division of Bengal. The town stands on the river Bhairab, and is the terminus of the Bengal Central railway, 109 m. E. of Calcutta. Pop. (1901), 10,426. It is the most important centre of river-borne trade in the delta.
KHULNA, is a town and district in British India, located in the Presidency division of Bengal. The town is situated on the Bhairab River and serves as the terminus for the Bengal Central railway, which is 109 miles east of Calcutta. The population in 1901 was 10,426. It is the most significant hub for river trade in the delta.
The District of Khulna lies in the middle of the delta of the Ganges, including a portion of the Sundarbans or seaward fringe of swamps. It was formed out of Jessore in 1882. Area (excluding the Sundarbans), 2077 sq. m. Besides the Sundarbans, the north-east part of the district is swampy; the north-west is more elevated and drier, while the central part, though low-lying, is cultivated. The whole is alluvial. In 1901 the population was 1,253,043, showing an increase of 6% in the decade. Rice is the principal crop; mustard, jute and tobacco are also grown, and the fisheries are important. Sugar is manufactured from the date palm. The district is entered by the Bengal Central railway, but by far the greater part of the traffic is carried by water.
The Khulna District is located in the center of the Ganges delta, which includes part of the Sundarbans, a coastal area filled with swamps. It was established from Jessore in 1882. The area (excluding the Sundarbans) is 2,077 sq. m. Besides the Sundarbans, the northeastern part of the district is swampy; the northwestern area is higher and drier, while the central region, despite being low-lying, is farmed. The entire area is alluvial. In 1901, the population was 1,253,043, marking a 6% increase over the previous decade. Rice is the main crop, along with mustard, jute, and tobacco, and fishing is significant. Sugar is made from the date palm. The district is accessed by the Bengal Central railway, but most of the transportation is done by water.
See District Gazetteer (Calcutta, 1908).
See District Gazetteer (Calcutta, 1908).

KHUNSAR, a town of Persia, sometimes belonging to the province of Isfahan, at others to Irak, 96 m. N.W. of Isfahan, in 33° 9′ N., 50° 23′ E., at an elevation of 7600 ft. Pop., about 10,000. It is picturesquely situated on both sides of a narrow valley through which the Khunsar River, a stream about 12 ft. wide, flows in a north-east direction to Kuom. The town and its fine gardens and orchards straggle some 6 m. along the valley with a mean breadth of scarcely half a mile. There is a great profusion of fruit, the apples yielding a kind of cider which, however, does not keep longer than a month. The climate is cool in summer and cold in winter. There are five caravanserais, three mosques and a post office.
KHUNSAR, is a town in Persia, sometimes part of the province of Isfahan and other times of Irak, located 96 miles northwest of Isfahan, at 33° 9′ N., 50° 23′ E., with an elevation of 7600 ft. Its population is around 10,000. The town is beautifully situated on both sides of a narrow valley that the Khunsar River, a stream about 12 ft. wide, flows through in a northeast direction toward Kuom. The town and its lovely gardens and orchards stretch about 6 miles along the valley, with an average width of barely half a mile. There is an abundance of fruit, and the apples produce a type of cider that only lasts for about a month. The climate is cool in summer and chilly in winter. There are five caravanserais, three mosques, and a post office.

KHURJA, a town of British India, in the Bulandshahr district of the United Provinces, 27 m. N.W. of Aligarh, near the main 782 line of the East Indian railway. Pop. (1901), 29,277. It is an important centre of trade in grain, indigo, sugar and ghi, and has cotton gins and presses and a manufacture of pottery. Jain traders form a large and wealthy class; and the principal building in the town is a modern Jain temple, a fine domed structure richly carved and ornamented in gold and colours.
KHURJA, is a town in British India, located in the Bulandshahr district of the United Provinces, 27 miles northwest of Aligarh, near the main 782 line of the East Indian railway. The population was 29,277 in 1901. It is a significant trade hub for grain, indigo, sugar, and ghi, and it has cotton gins and presses as well as a pottery industry. Jain traders make up a large and affluent community, and the main building in the town is a modern Jain temple, a stunning domed structure that is intricately carved and adorned with gold and vibrant colors.

KHYBER PASS, the most important of the passes which lead from Afghanistan into India. It is a narrow defile winding between cliffs of shale and limestone 600 to 1000 ft. high, stretching up to more lofty mountains behind. No other pass in the world has possessed such strategic importance or retains so many historic associations as this gateway to the plains of India. It has probably seen Persian and Greek, Seljuk, Tatar, Mongol and Durani conquerors, with the hosts of Alexander the Great, Mahmud of Ghazni, Jenghiz Khan, Timur, Baber, Nadir Shah, Ahmed Shah, and numerous other warrior chiefs pass and repass through its rocky defiles during a period of 2000 years. The mountain barrier which separates the Peshawar plains from the Afghan highlands differs in many respects from the mountain barrier which intervenes between the Indus plains and the plateau farther south. To the south this barrier consists of a series of flexures folded parallel to the river, through which the plateau drainage breaks down in transverse lines forming gorges and clefts as it cuts through successive ridges. West of Peshawar the strike of the mountain systems is roughly from west to east, and this formation is maintained with more or less regularity as far south as the Tochi River and Waziristan. Almost immediately west of Peshawar, and stretching along the same parallel of latitude from the meridian of Kabul to within ten miles of the Peshawar cantonment, is the great central range of the Safed Koh, which forms throughout its long, straight line of rugged peaks the southern wall, or water-divide, of the Kabul River basin. About the meridian of 71 E. it forks, sending off to the north-east what is locally known as a spur to the Kabul River, but which is geographically only part of that stupendous water-divide which hedges in the Kunar and Chitral valleys, and, under the name of the Shandur Range, unites with the Hindu Kush near the head of the Taghdumbash Pamir. The Kabul River breaks through this northern spur of the Safed Koh; and in breaking through it is forced to the northward in a curved channel or trough, deeply sunk in the mountains between terrific cliffs and precipices, where its narrow waterway affords no foothold to man or beast for many miles. To reach the Kabul River within Afghan territory it is necessary to pass over this water-divide; and the Khyber stream, flowing down from the pass at Landi Kotal to a point in the plains opposite Jamrud, 9 m. W. of Peshawar, affords the opportunity.
KHYBER PASS, is the most significant of the routes connecting Afghanistan to India. It’s a narrow path winding between cliffs of shale and limestone that rise from 600 to 1000 feet high, leading up to even taller mountains behind it. No other pass in the world has had such strategic significance or carries as many historical connections as this gateway to the plains of India. Over the last 2000 years, it has witnessed Persian, Greek, Seljuk, Tatar, Mongol, and Durani conquerors, along with the armies of Alexander the Great, Mahmud of Ghazni, Genghis Khan, Timur, Babur, Nadir Shah, Ahmed Shah, and countless other warrior leaders moving through its rocky passages. The mountain barrier separating the Peshawar plains from the Afghan highlands is quite different from the mountains lying between the Indus plains and the plateau to the south. To the south, this barrier is made up of a series of folds running parallel to the river, through which the plateau’s drainage creates gorges and clefts as it carves through successive ridges. West of Peshawar, the mountain systems trend roughly from west to east, maintaining this formation with some consistency down to the Tochi River and Waziristan. Just west of Peshawar, and extending along the same latitude from Kabul to within ten miles of the Peshawar cantonment, lies the prominent central range of the Safed Koh, which acts as the southern wall, or water-divide, of the Kabul River basin along its long, straight line of rugged peaks. Around the meridian of 71 E, it forks, sending off a spur to the north-east known locally as a spur to the Kabul River, but in geographical terms, it’s part of the massive water-divide that encloses the Kunar and Chitral valleys and connects with the Hindu Kush under the name of the Shandur Range near the head of the Taghdumbash Pamir. The Kabul River carves through this northern spur of the Safed Koh; and as it does, it’s forced to flow northward in a curved channel or trough, deeply set between steep cliffs and precipices, where its narrow path offers no foothold for humans or animals for many miles. To reach the Kabul River within Afghan territory, one must cross over this water-divide; and the Khyber stream, flowing down from the pass at Landi Kotal to a spot in the plains opposite Jamrud, 9 miles west of Peshawar, provides that opportunity.
Pursuing the main road from Peshawar to Kabul, the fort of Jamrud, which commands the British end of the Khyber Pass, lies some 11 m. W. of Peshawar. The road leads through a barren stony plain, cut up by water-courses and infested by all the worst cut-throats in the Peshawar district. Some three miles beyond Jamrud the road enters the mountains at an opening called Shadi Bagiar, and here the Khyber proper begins. The highway runs for a short distance through the bed of a ravine, and then joins the road made by Colonel Mackeson in 1839-1842, until it ascends on the left-hand side to a plateau called Shagai. From here can be seen the fort of Ali Masjid, which commands the centre of the pass, and which has been the scene of more than one famous siege. Still going westward the road turns to the right, and by an easy zigzag descends to the river of Ali Masjid, and runs along its bank. The new road along this cliff was made by the British during the Second Afghan War (1879-80), and here is the narrowest part of the Khyber, not more than 15 ft. broad, with the Rhotas hill on the right fully 2000 ft. overhead. Some three miles farther on the valley widens, and on either side lie the hamlets and some sixty towers of the Zakka Khel Afridis. Then comes the Loargi Shinwari plateau, some seven miles in length and three in its widest part, ending at Landi Kotal, where is another British fort, which closes this end of the Khyber and overlooks the plains of Afghanistan. After leaving Landi Kotal the great Kabul highway passes between low hills, until it debouches on the Kabul River and leads to Dakka. The whole of the Khyber Pass from end to end lies within the country of the Afridis, and is now recognized as under British control. From Shadi Bagiar on the east to Landi Kotal on the west is about 20 m. in a straight line.
Traveling along the main road from Peshawar to Kabul, the fort of Jamrud, which overlooks the British side of the Khyber Pass, is located about 11 miles west of Peshawar. The road goes through a bare, rocky plain, marked by water flow and swarming with the most notorious criminals from the Peshawar area. About three miles past Jamrud, the road enters the mountains at a spot known as Shadi Bagiar, marking the true beginning of the Khyber. For a brief stretch, the highway runs through a ravine and then connects with the road built by Colonel Mackeson between 1839 and 1842, ascending on the left side to a plateau known as Shagai. From this point, you can see the fort of Ali Masjid, which controls the center of the pass and has been the site of several famous sieges. Continuing westward, the road curves to the right and gently winds down to the Ali Masjid river, following its banks. The new road along this cliff was constructed by the British during the Second Afghan War (1879-80), and here is the narrowest section of the Khyber, just 15 feet wide, with Rhotas hill rising over 2000 feet to the right. Three miles further, the valley widens, with hamlets and around sixty towers belonging to the Zakka Khel Afridis on either side. Next is the Loargi Shinwari plateau, approximately seven miles long and three miles wide, ending at Landi Kotal, which has another British fort that secures this end of the Khyber and overlooks the plains of Afghanistan. After leaving Landi Kotal, the main highway to Kabul runs between low hills until it reaches the Kabul River and leads to Dakka. The entire Khyber Pass, from one end to the other, lies within Afridi territory and is now recognized as under British control. The distance from Shadi Bagiar in the east to Landi Kotal in the west is about 20 miles in a straight line.
The Khyber has been adopted by the British as the main road to Kabul, but its difficulties (before they were overcome by British engineers) were such that it was never so regarded by former rulers of India. The old road to India left the Kabul River near its junction with the Kunar, and crossed the great divide between the Kunar valley and Bajour; then it turned southwards to the plains. During the first Afghan War the Khyber was the scene of many skirmishes with the Afridis and some disasters to the British troops. In July 1839 Colonel Wade captured the fortress of Ali Masjid. In 1842, when Jalalabad was blockaded, Colonel Moseley was sent to occupy the same fort, but was compelled to evacuate it after a few days owing to scarcity of provisions. In April of the same year it was reoccupied by General Pollock in his advance to Kabul. It was at Ali Masjid that Sir Neville Chamberlain’s friendly mission to the amir Shere Ali was stopped in 1878, thus causing the second Afghan War; and on the outbreak of that war Ali Masjid was captured by Sir Samuel Browne. The treaty which closed the war in May 1879 left the Khyber tribes under British control. From that time the pass was protected by jezailchis drawn from the Afridi tribe, who were paid a subsidy by the British government. For 18 years, from 1879 onward, Colonel R. Warburton controlled the Khyber, and for the greater part of that time secured its safety; but his term of office came to an end synchronously with the wave of fanaticism which swept along the north-west border of India during 1897. The Afridis were persuaded by their mullahs to attack the pass, which they themselves had guaranteed. The British government were warned of the intended movement, but only withdrew the British officers belonging to the Khyber Rifles, and left the pass to its fate. The Khyber Rifles, deserted by their officers, made a half-hearted resistance to their fellow-tribesmen, and the pass fell into the hands of the Afridis, and remained in their possession for some months. This was the chief cause of the Tirah Expedition of 1897. The Khyber Rifles were afterwards strengthened, and divided into two battalions commanded by four British officers.
The British made the Khyber the main route to Kabul, but it was so challenging (before British engineers fixed the issues) that previous rulers of India never saw it that way. The old road to India left the Kabul River where it meets the Kunar and crossed the high ground between the Kunar Valley and Bajour, then headed south to the plains. During the first Afghan War, the Khyber saw many skirmishes with the Afridis and some setbacks for the British troops. In July 1839, Colonel Wade captured the fortress of Ali Masjid. In 1842, when Jalalabad was under siege, Colonel Moseley was sent to take the same fort but had to leave after a few days due to a lack of supplies. Later that April, General Pollock reoccupied it while advancing to Kabul. It was at Ali Masjid that Sir Neville Chamberlain's friendly mission to Amir Shere Ali was halted in 1878, triggering the second Afghan War; when that war began, Ali Masjid was taken by Sir Samuel Browne. The treaty that ended the war in May 1879 put the Khyber tribes under British control. After that, the pass was secured by jezailchis from the Afridi tribe, who received a subsidy from the British government. For 18 years, starting in 1879, Colonel R. Warburton managed the Khyber and mostly ensured its safety. However, his time in charge ended during the surge of fanaticism that spread across India's north-west border in 1897. The Afridis, influenced by their mullahs, were convinced to attack the pass, which they had previously guaranteed. The British government was warned about the planned attack but only pulled back the British officers from the Khyber Rifles, leaving the pass to its fate. The Khyber Rifles, abandoned by their officers, put up a half-hearted fight against their fellow tribesmen, and the pass fell into the Afridis' hands, where it remained for several months. This was a major factor leading to the Tirah Expedition of 1897. The Khyber Rifles were later reinforced and split into two battalions, led by four British officers.
See Eighteen Years in the Khyber, by Sir Robert Warburton (1900); Indian Borderland, by Sir T. Holdich (1901).
See Eighteen Years in the Khyber, by Sir Robert Warburton (1900); Indian Borderland, by Sir T. Holdich (1901).

KIAKHTA, a town of Siberia, one of the chief centres of trade between Russia and China, on the Kiakhta, an affluent of the Selenga, and on an elevated plain surrounded by mountains, in the Russian government of Transbaikalia, 320 m. S.W. of Chita, the capital, and close to the Chinese frontier, in 50° 20′ N., 106° 40′ E. Besides the lower town or Kiakhta proper, the municipal jurisdiction comprises the fortified upper town of Troitskosavsk, about 2 m. N., and the settlement of Ust-Kiakhta, 10 m. farther distant. The lower town stands directly opposite to the Chinese emporium of Maimachin, is surrounded by walls, and consists principally of one broad street and a large exchange courtyard. From 1689 to 1727 the trade of Kiakhta was a government monopoly, but in the latter year it was thrown open to private merchants, and continued to improve until 1860, when the right of commercial intercourse was extended along the whole Russian-Chinese frontier. The annual December fairs for which Kiakhta was formerly famous, and also the regular traffic passing through the town, have considerably fallen off since that date. The Russians exchange here leather, sheepskins, furs, horns, woollen cloths, coarse linens and cattle for teas (in value 95% of the entire imports), porcelain, rhubarb, manufactured silks, nankeens and other Chinese produce. The population, including Ust-Kiakhta (5000) and Troitskosavsk (9213 in 1897), is nearly 20,000.
KIAKHTA, is a town in Siberia, one of the main trade centers between Russia and China, located on the Kiakhta River, a tributary of the Selenga, on a high plain surrounded by mountains. It's in the Russian region of Transbaikalia, 320 miles southwest of Chita, the capital, and close to the Chinese border, at 50° 20′ N., 106° 40′ E. In addition to the lower town, known as Kiakhta proper, the area also includes the fortified upper town of Troitskosavsk, about 2 miles to the north, and the settlement of Ust-Kiakhta, which is another 10 miles away. The lower town is located directly across from the Chinese market of Maimachin, is enclosed by walls, and mainly features one wide street and a large exchange courtyard. From 1689 to 1727, the trade in Kiakhta was controlled by the government, but in 1727 it was opened up to private merchants and continued to grow until 1860, when the right to trade was extended along the entire Russian-Chinese border. The annual December fairs for which Kiakhta was once famous, along with regular trade through the town, have significantly declined since then. Here, the Russians trade leather, sheepskins, furs, horns, woolen cloth, coarse linens, and cattle for tea (which makes up 95% of all imports), porcelain, rhubarb, manufactured silks, nankeens, and other Chinese goods. The population, including Ust-Kiakhta (5,000) and Troitskosavsk (9,213 in 1897), is nearly 20,000.

KIANG-SI, an eastern province of China, bounded N. by Hu-peh and Ngan-hui, S. by Kwang-tung, E. by Fu-kien, and 783 W. by Hu-nan. It has an area of 72,176 sq. m., and a population returned at 22,000,000. It is divided into fourteen prefectures. The provincial capital is Nan-ch’ang Fu, on the Kan Kiang, about 35 m. from the Po-yang Lake. The whole province is traversed in a south-westerly and north-easterly direction by the Nan-shan ranges. The largest river is the Kan Kiang, which rises in the mountains in the south of the province and flows north-east to the Po-yang Lake. It was over the Meiling Pass and down this river that, in old days, embassies landing at Canton proceeded to Peking. During the summer time it has water of sufficient depth for steamers of light draft as far as Nan-ch’ang, and it is navigable by native craft for a considerable distance beyond that city. Another river of note is the Chang Kiang, which has its source in the province of Ngan-hui and flows into the Po-yang Lake, connecting in its course the Wu-yuen district, whence come the celebrated “Moyune” green teas, and the city of King-te-chên, celebrated for its pottery, with Jao-chow Fu on the lake. The black “Kaisow” teas are brought from the Ho-kow district, where they are grown, down the river Kin to Juy-hung on the lake, and the Siu-ho connects by a navigable stream I-ning Chow, in the neighbourhood of which city the best black teas of this part of China are produced, with Wu-ching, the principal mart of trade on the lake. The principal products of the province are tea, China ware, grass-cloth, hemp, paper, tobacco and tallow. Kiu-kiang, the treaty port of the province, opened to foreign trade in 1861, is on the Yangtsze-kiang, a short distance above the junction of the Po-yang Lake with that river.
JIANGXI, an eastern province of China, is bordered to the north by Hubei and Anhui, to the south by Guangdong, to the east by Fujian, and to the west by Hunan. It covers an area of 72,176 square miles and has a population estimated at 22,000,000. The province is divided into fourteen prefectures. The capital city is Nanchang, located on the Kan River, about 35 miles from Poyang Lake. The entire province is crossed by the Nan Mountains running southwest to northeast. The largest river is the Kan River, which originates in the southern mountains and flows northeast into Poyang Lake. In ancient times, embassies arriving in Canton would travel via the Meiling Pass and down this river to Peking. During summer, the river has enough depth for light-draft steamers as far as Nanchang, and native boats can navigate well beyond that city. Another significant river is the Yangtze, which starts in Anhui and flows into Poyang Lake, connecting the Wu-yuan district, known for its famous "Moyune" green teas, and the city of Jingdezhen, famous for its porcelain, with Jiujiang on the lake. The black "Kaisow" teas come from the Hekou district, where they are grown, traveling down the Kin River to Jiujiang on the lake, while the Siu River connects to a navigable stream at Yining County, where some of the best black teas in this part of China are produced, linking to Wucheng, the main trade hub on the lake. The major products of the province include tea, china ware, grass cloth, hemp, paper, tobacco, and tallow. Kiujiang, the province's treaty port, was opened to foreign trade in 1861 and is located on the Yangtze River just above the confluence with Poyang Lake.

KIANG-SU, a maritime province of China, bounded N. by Shantung, S. by Cheh-kiang, W. by Ngan-hui, and E. by the sea. It has an area of 45,000 sq. m., and a population estimated at 21,000,000. Kiang-su forms part of the great plain of northern China. There are no mountains within its limits, and few hills. It is watered as no other province in China is watered. The Grand Canal runs through it from south to north; the Yangtsze-kiang crosses its southern portion from west to east; it possesses several lakes, of which the T’ai-hu is the most noteworthy, and numberless streams connect the canal with the sea. Its coast is studded with low islands and sandbanks, the results of the deposits brought down by the Hwang-ho. Kiang-su is rich in places of interest. Nanking, “the Southern Capital,” was the seat of the Chinese court until the beginning of the 15th century, and it was the headquarters of the T’ai-p’ing rebels from 1853, when they took the city by assault, to 1864, when its garrison yielded to Colonel Gordon’s army. Hang-chow Fu and Su-chow Fu, situated on the T’ai-hu, are reckoned the most beautiful cities in China. “Above there is Paradise, below are Su and Hang,” says a Chinese proverb. Shang-hai is the chief port in the province. In 1909 it was connected by railway (270 m. long) via Su-Chow and Chin-kiang with Nanking. Tea and silk are the principal articles of commerce produced in Kiang-su, and next in importance are cotton, sugar and medicines. The silk manufactured in the looms of Su-chow is famous all over the empire. In the mountains near Nanking, coal, plumbago, iron ore and marble are found. Shang-hai, Chin-kiang, Nanking and Su-chow are the treaty ports of the province.
JIANGSU, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ is a coastal province in China, bordered to the north by Shandong, to the south by Zhejiang, to the west by Anhui, and to the east by the sea. It covers an area of 45,000 square miles and has an estimated population of 21,000,000. Jiangsu is part of the vast northern China plain. There are no mountains within its boundaries, and few hills. It is irrigated more than any other province in China. The Grand Canal runs through it from south to north; the Yangtze River crosses its southern section from west to east; it has several lakes, the largest being Taihu, and countless streams connect the canal to the sea. Its coastline features low islands and sandbanks formed from deposits carried by the Yellow River. Jiangsu is rich in attractions. Nanjing, “the Southern Capital,” was the center of the Chinese court until the early 15th century, and it was the base for the Taiping rebels from 1853, when they captured the city, until 1864, when its defenses surrendered to Colonel Gordon’s army. Hangzhou and Suzhou, located by Taihu, are considered the most beautiful cities in China. “Above there is Paradise, below are Su and Hang,” goes a Chinese proverb. Shanghai is the main port in the province. In 1909, it was connected by a 270-mile railway to Nanjing via Suzhou and Zhenjiang. Tea and silk are the main exports from Jiangsu, followed by cotton, sugar, and medicines. The silk produced in Suzhou's looms is famous throughout the empire. Near Nanjing, coal, graphite, iron ore, and marble can be found. Shanghai, Zhenjiang, Nanjing, and Suzhou are the treaty ports in the province.

KIAOCHOW BAY, a large inlet on the south side of the promontory of Shantung, in China. It was seized in November 1897 by the German fleet, nominally to secure reparation for the murder of two German missionaries in the province of Shantung. In the negotiations which followed, it was arranged that the bay and the land on both sides of the entrance within certain defined lines should be leased to Germany for 99 years. During the continuance of the lease Germany exercises all the rights of territorial sovereignty, including the right to erect fortifications. The area leased is about 117 sq. m., and over a further area, comprising a zone of some 32 m., measured from any point on the shore of the bay, the Chinese government may not issue any ordinances without the consent of Germany. The native population in the ceded area is about 60,000. The German government in 1899 declared Kiaochow a free port. By arrangement with the Chinese government a branch of the Imperial maritime customs has been established there for the collection of duties upon goods coming from or going to the interior, in accordance with the general treaty tariff. Trade centres at Ts’ingtao, a town within the bay. The country in the neighbourhood is mountainous and bare, but the lowlands are well cultivated. Ts’ingtao is connected by railway with Chinan Fu, the capital of the province; a continuation of the same line provides for a junction with the main Lu-Han (Peking-Hankow) railway. The value of the trade of the port during 1904 was £2,712,145 (£1,808,113 imports and £904,032 exports).
Kiaochow Bay, is a large inlet on the south side of the Shantung peninsula in China. It was taken over by the German fleet in November 1897, officially to secure compensation for the murder of two German missionaries in Shantung province. In the subsequent negotiations, it was agreed that the bay and the land on both sides of the entrance within specified boundaries would be leased to Germany for 99 years. Throughout the lease period, Germany holds all the rights of territorial sovereignty, including the right to build fortifications. The leased area is about 117 sq. miles, and within a further zone of approximately 32 miles from any point on the shore of the bay, the Chinese government cannot issue any regulations without Germany's consent. The native population in the leased area is about 60,000. In 1899, the German government declared Kiaochow a free port. By agreement with the Chinese government, a branch of the Imperial maritime customs was established there to collect duties on goods coming from or going to the interior, following the general treaty tariff. Trade centers around Ts’ingtao, a town within the bay. The surrounding country is mountainous and barren, but the lowlands are well cultivated. Ts’ingtao is connected by railway to Chinan Fu, the provincial capital; a continuation of the same line connects to the main Lu-Han (Peking-Hankow) railway. The value of the port's trade in 1904 was £2,712,145 (£1,808,113 in imports and £904,032 in exports).

KICKAPOO (“he moves about”), the name of a tribe of North American Indians of Algonquian stock. When first met by the French they were in central Wisconsin. They subsequently removed to the Ohio valley. They fought on the English side in the War of Independence and that of 1812. In 1852 a large band went to Texas and Mexico and gave much trouble to the settlers; but in 1873 the bulk of the tribe was settled on its present reservation in Oklahoma. They number some 800, of whom about a third are still in Mexico.
KICKAPOO ("he moves about"), the name of a tribe of North American Indians of Algonquian descent. When the French first encountered them, they were in central Wisconsin. They later moved to the Ohio Valley. They fought on the English side during the War of Independence and the War of 1812. In 1852, a large group went to Texas and Mexico and caused a lot of problems for the settlers; however, in 1873, most of the tribe was settled on their current reservation in Oklahoma. They number around 800, with about a third still living in Mexico.

KIDD, JOHN (1775-1851), English physician, chemist and geologist, born at Westminster on the 10th of September 1775, was the son of a naval officer, Captain John Kidd. He was educated at Bury St Edmunds and Westminster, and afterwards at Christ Church, Oxford, where he graduated B.A. in 1797 (M.D. in 1804). He also studied at Guy’s Hospital, London (1797-1801), where he was a pupil of Sir Astley Cooper. He became reader in chemistry at Oxford in 1801, and in 1803 was elected the first Aldrichian professor of chemistry. He then voluntarily gave courses of lectures on mineralogy and geology: these were delivered in the dark chambers under the Ashmolean Museum, and there J. J. and W. D. Conybeare, W. Buckland, C. G. B. Daubeny and others gained their first lessons in geology. Kidd was a popular and instructive lecturer, and through his efforts the geological chair, first held by Buckland, was established. In 1818 he became a F.R.C.P.; in 1822 regius professor of medicine in succession to Sir Christopher Pegge; and in 1834 he was appointed keeper of the Radcliffe Library. He delivered the Harveian oration before the Royal College of Physicians in 1834. He died at Oxford on the 7th of September 1851.
KIDD, JOHN (1775-1851), English doctor, chemist, and geologist, was born in Westminster on September 10, 1775, to a naval officer, Captain John Kidd. He attended school in Bury St Edmunds and Westminster before going on to Christ Church, Oxford, where he graduated with a BA in 1797 and an MD in 1804. He also studied at Guy’s Hospital, London (1797-1801), where he was a student of Sir Astley Cooper. He became a lecturer in chemistry at Oxford in 1801 and was elected as the first Aldrichian professor of chemistry in 1803. He then voluntarily gave lectures on mineralogy and geology, which were held in the dark chambers beneath the Ashmolean Museum. It was there that J. J. and W. D. Conybeare, W. Buckland, C. G. B. Daubeny, and others received their initial training in geology. Kidd was a well-liked and informative lecturer, and due to his efforts, the geological chair, initially held by Buckland, was established. In 1818, he became a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians; in 1822, he was appointed regius professor of medicine, succeeding Sir Christopher Pegge; and in 1834, he was named keeper of the Radcliffe Library. He delivered the Harveian oration before the Royal College of Physicians in 1834. He passed away in Oxford on September 7, 1851.
Publications.—Outlines of Mineralogy (2 vols., 1809); A Geological Essay on the Imperfect Evidence in Support of a Theory of the Earth (1815); On the Adaptation of External Nature to the Physical Condition of Man, 1833 (Bridgewater Treatise).
Publications.—Outlines of Mineralogy (2 vols., 1809); A Geological Essay on the Imperfect Evidence in Support of a Theory of the Earth (1815); On the Adaptation of External Nature to the Physical Condition of Man, 1833 (Bridgewater Treatise).

KIDD, THOMAS (1770-1850), English classical scholar and schoolmaster, was born in Yorkshire. He was educated at Giggleswick School and Trinity College, Cambridge. He held numerous scholastic and clerical appointments, the last being the rectory of Croxton, near Cambridge, where he died on the 27th of August 1850. Kidd was an intimate friend of Porson and Charles Burney the younger. He contributed largely to periodicals, chiefly on classical subjects, but his reputation mainly rests upon his editions of the works of other scholars: Opuscula Ruhnkeniana (1807), the minor works of the great Dutch scholar David Ruhnken; Miscellanea Critica of Richard Dawes (2nd ed., 1827); Tracts and Miscellaneous Criticisms of Richard Porson (1815). He also published an edition of the works of Horace (1817) based upon Bentley’s recension.
KIDD, THOMAS (1770-1850), an English classical scholar and schoolteacher, was born in Yorkshire. He was educated at Giggleswick School and Trinity College, Cambridge. He held various academic and clerical positions, with his last role being the rector of Croxton, near Cambridge, where he passed away on August 27, 1850. Kidd was a close friend of Porson and Charles Burney the younger. He made significant contributions to periodicals, primarily on classical topics, but his reputation is largely based on his editions of other scholars' works: Opuscula Ruhnkeniana (1807), the minor works of the renowned Dutch scholar David Ruhnken; Miscellanea Critica by Richard Dawes (2nd ed., 1827); Tracts and Miscellaneous Criticisms by Richard Porson (1815). He also published an edition of Horace's works (1817) based on Bentley’s revision.

KIDD, WILLIAM [Captain Kidd] (c. 1645-1701), privateer and pirate, was born, perhaps, in Greenock, Scotland, but his origin is quite obscure. He told Paul Lorraine, the ordinary of Newgate, that he was “about 56” at the time of his condemnation for piracy in 1701. In 1691 an award from the council of New York of £150 was given him for his services during the disturbances in the colony after the revolution of 1688. He was commissioned later to chase a hostile privateer off the coast, is described as an owner of ships, and is known to have served with credit against the French in the West Indies. In 1695 he came to London with a sloop of his own to trade. Colonel R. Livingston (1654-1724), a well-known New York landowner, recommended him to the newly appointed colonial governor Lord Bellomont, as a fit man to command a vessel to cruise against the pirates in the Eastern seas (see Pirate). 784 Accordingly the “Adventure Galley,” a vessel of 30 guns and 275 tons, was privately fitted out, and the command given to Captain Kidd, who received the king’s commission to arrest and bring to trial all pirates, and a commission of reprisals against the French. Kidd sailed from Plymouth in May 1696 for New York, where he filled up his crew, and in 1697 reached Madagascar, the pirates’ principal rendezvous. He made no effort whatever to hunt them down. On the contrary he associated himself with a notorious pirate named Culliford. The fact would seem to be that Kidd meant only to capture French ships. When he found none he captured native trading vessels, under pretence that they were provided with French passes and were fair prize, and he plundered on the coast of Malabar. During 1698-1699 complaints reached the British government as to the character of his proceedings. Lord Bellomont was instructed to apprehend him if he should return to America. Kidd deserted the “Adventure” in Madagascar, and sailed for America in one of his prizes, the “Quedah Merchant,” which he also left in the West Indies. He reached New England in a small sloop with several of his crew and wrote to Bellomont, professing his ability to justify himself and sending the governor booty. He was arrested in July 1699, was sent to England and tried, first for the murder of one of his crew, and then with others for piracy. He was found guilty on both charges, and hanged at Execution Dock, London, on the 23rd of May 1701. The evidence against him was that of two members of his crew, the surgeon and a sailor who turned king’s evidence, but no other witnesses could be got in such circumstances, as the judge told him when he protested. “Captain Kidd’s Treasure” has been sought by various expeditions and about £14,000 was recovered from Kidd’s ship and from Gardiner’s Island (off the E. end of Long Island); but its magnitude was palpably exaggerated. He left a wife and child at New York. The so-called ballad about him is a poor imitation of the authentic chant of Admiral Benbow.
KIDD, WILLIAM [Captain Kidd] (c. 1645-1701), privateer and pirate, was possibly born in Greenock, Scotland, but his origins are quite unclear. He told Paul Lorraine, the keeper of Newgate prison, that he was “about 56” when he was sentenced for piracy in 1701. In 1691, the council of New York awarded him £150 for his services during the unrest in the colony after the revolution of 1688. He was later commissioned to pursue a hostile privateer off the coast, is described as a shipowner, and is known to have successfully served against the French in the West Indies. In 1695, he arrived in London with his own sloop to trade. Colonel R. Livingston (1654-1724), a prominent New York landowner, recommended him to the newly appointed colonial governor, Lord Bellomont, as a suitable person to command a ship to hunt pirates in the Eastern seas (see Pirate). 784 Consequently, the “Adventure Galley,” a ship with 30 guns and 275 tons, was privately fitted out, and command was given to Captain Kidd, who received the king’s commission to arrest and prosecute all pirates, along with a commission for reprisals against the French. Kidd set sail from Plymouth in May 1696 for New York, where he completed his crew, and in 1697 reached Madagascar, the main base for pirates. He made no effort to capture them. Instead, he allied himself with a notorious pirate named Culliford. It seems that Kidd intended only to seize French ships. When he found none, he captured native trading vessels, claiming they had French permits and were legitimate prizes, and he plundered along the Malabar coast. Between 1698 and 1699, complaints about his actions reached the British government. Lord Bellomont was instructed to arrest him if he returned to America. Kidd abandoned the “Adventure” in Madagascar and sailed to America on one of his prizes, the “Quedah Merchant,” which he also left in the West Indies. He arrived in New England in a small sloop with several of his crew and wrote to Bellomont, claiming he could justify his actions and sending the governor some of his loot. He was arrested in July 1699, sent to England, and tried, first for the murder of one of his crew members, and then alongside others for piracy. He was found guilty on both counts and hanged at Execution Dock in London on May 23, 1701. The evidence against him came from two crew members, the ship’s surgeon and a sailor who testified against him, but no other witnesses could be found, as the judge informed him when he protested. “Captain Kidd’s Treasure” has been sought by various expeditions, and about £14,000 was recovered from Kidd’s ship and from Gardiner’s Island (off the east end of Long Island); however, the amount was clearly exaggerated. He left behind a wife and child in New York. The so-called ballad about him is a poor imitation of the authentic song of Admiral Benbow.
Much has been written about Kidd, less because of the intrinsic interest of his career than because the agreement made with him by Bellomont was the subject of violent political controversy. The best popular account is in An Historical Sketch of Robin Hood and Captain Kidd by W. W. Campbell (New York, 1853), in which the essential documents are quoted. But see Pirate.
Much has been written about Kidd, not so much because of the inherent interest of his career, but because the deal Bellomont made with him sparked intense political debate. The best popular account can be found in An Historical Sketch of Robin Hood and Captain Kidd by W. W. Campbell (New York, 1853), which includes the key documents. But see Pirate.

KIDDERMINSTER, a market town and municipal and parliamentary borough of Worcestershire, England, 135½ m. N.W. by W. from London and 15 m. N. of Worcester by the Great Western railway, on the river Stour and the Staffordshire and Worcestershire canal. Pop. (1901), 24,692. The parish church of All Saints, well placed above the river, is a fine Early English and Decorated building, with Perpendicular additions. Of other buildings the principal are the town hall (1876), the corporation buildings, and the school of science and art and free library. There is a free grammar school founded in 1637. A public recreation ground, Brinton Park, was opened in 1887. Richard Baxter, who was elected by the townsfolk as their minister in 1641, was instrumental in saving the town from a reputation of ignorance and depravity caused by the laxity of their clergy. He is commemorated by a statue, as is Sir Rowland Hill, the introducer of penny postage, who was born here in 1795. Kidderminster is chiefly celebrated for its carpets. The permanency of colour by which they are distinguished is attributed to the properties of the water of the Stour, which is impregnated with iron and fuller’s earth. Worsted spinning and dyeing are also carried on, and there are iron foundries, tinplate works, breweries, malthouses, &c. The parliamentary borough returns one member. The town is governed by a mayor, 6 aldermen and 18 councillors. Area, 1214 acres.
KIDDERMINSTER, is a market town and municipal and parliamentary borough in Worcestershire, England, located 135½ miles northwest of London and 15 miles north of Worcester by the Great Western railway, situated on the river Stour and the Staffordshire and Worcestershire canal. Population (1901), 24,692. The parish church of All Saints, nicely positioned above the river, is an impressive Early English and Decorated structure, with Perpendicular additions. Among other buildings, the town hall (1876), the corporation buildings, and the school of science and art with a free library are notable. There is a free grammar school that was established in 1637. A public recreation area, Brinton Park, opened in 1887. Richard Baxter, elected by the townsfolk as their minister in 1641, played a key role in improving the town's reputation, which had suffered from ignorance and depravity due to the leniency of their clergy. He is honored with a statue, as is Sir Rowland Hill, the pioneer of penny postage, who was born here in 1795. Kidderminster is especially known for its carpets. The lasting color of these carpets is attributed to the properties of the Stour's water, which is rich in iron and fuller’s earth. Other industries include worsted spinning and dyeing, as well as iron foundries, tinplate works, breweries, malthouses, etc. The parliamentary borough elects one member. The town is governed by a mayor, six aldermen, and eighteen councillors. Area, 1,214 acres.
In 736 lands upon the river Stour, called Stour in Usmere, which have been identified with the site of Kidderminster (Chideminstre), were given to Earl Cyneberght by King Æthelbald to found a monastery. If this monastery was ever built, it was afterwards annexed to the church of Worcester, and the lands on the Stour formed part of the gift of Coenwulf, king of the Mercians, to Deneberht, bishop of Worcester, but were exchanged with the same king in 816 for other property. At the Domesday Survey, Kidderminster was still in the hands of the king and remained a royal manor until Henry II. granted it to Manser Biset. The poet Edmund Waller was one of the 17th century lords of the manor. The town was possibly a borough in 1187 when the men paid £4 to an aid. As a royal possession it appears to have enjoyed various privileges in the 12th century, among them the right of choosing a bailiff to collect the toll and render it to the king, and to elect six burgesses and send them to the view of frankpledge twice a year. The first charter of incorporation, granted in 1636, appointed a bailiff and 12 capital burgesses forming a common council. The town was governed under this charter until the Municipal Reform Act of 1835. Kidderminster sent two members to the parliament of 1295, but was not again represented until the privilege of sending one member was conferred by the Reform Act of 1832. The first mention of the cloth trade for which Kidderminster was formerly noted occurs in 1334, when it was enacted that no one should make woollen cloth in the borough without the bailiff’s seal. At the end of the 18th century the trade was still important, but it began to decline after the invention of machinery, probably owing to the poverty of the manufacturers. The manufacture of woollen goods was however replaced by that of carpets, introduced in 1735. At first only the “Kidderminster” carpets were made, but in 1749 a Brussels loom was set up in the town and Brussels carpets were soon produced in large quantities.
In 736, lands along the River Stour, known as Stour in Usmere, were given to Earl Cyneberght by King Æthelbald to establish a monastery at the site identified as Kidderminster (Chideminstre). If that monastery was ever constructed, it was later attached to the church of Worcester. The lands on the Stour became part of a gift from Coenwulf, king of the Mercians, to Deneberht, bishop of Worcester, but were exchanged with the same king in 816 for other property. At the time of the Domesday Survey, Kidderminster was still under the king's control and remained a royal manor until Henry II granted it to Manser Biset. The poet Edmund Waller was one of the lord's of the manor in the 17th century. The town may have been a borough in 1187 when the men paid £4 for an aid. As a royal possession, it seems to have enjoyed various privileges in the 12th century, including the right to choose a bailiff to collect tolls for the king and elect six burgesses to attend the view of frankpledge twice a year. The first charter of incorporation, granted in 1636, appointed a bailiff and 12 capital burgesses to form a common council. The town was governed under this charter until the Municipal Reform Act of 1835. Kidderminster sent two representatives to the parliament of 1295, but it wasn't represented again until the Reform Act of 1832 allowed it to send one member. The first mention of the cloth trade for which Kidderminster was previously known occurred in 1334, when it was established that no one could make woollen cloth in the borough without the bailiff’s seal. By the end of the 18th century, the trade was still significant but began to decline after machinery was invented, likely due to the poverty of the manufacturers. However, the production of woollen goods was replaced by carpet manufacturing, which started in 1735. Initially, only “Kidderminster” carpets were made, but in 1749 a Brussels loom was introduced in the town, leading to the large-scale production of Brussels carpets.
See Victoria County History: Worcestershire; J. R. Burton, A History of Kidderminster, with Short Accounts of some Neighbouring Parishes (1890).
See Victoria County History: Worcestershire; J. R. Burton, A History of Kidderminster, with Short Accounts of some Neighbouring Parishes (1890).

KIDNAPPING (from kid, a slang term for a child, and nap or nab, to steal), originally the stealing and carrying away of children and others to serve as servants or labourers in the American plantations; it was defined by Blackstone as the forcible abduction or stealing away of a man, woman or child from their own country and sending them into another. The difference between kidnapping, abduction (q.v.) and false imprisonment is not very great; indeed, kidnapping may be said to be a form of assault and false imprisonment, aggravated by the carrying of the person to some other place. The term is, however, more commonly applied in England to the offence of taking away children from the possession of their parents. By the Offences against the Person Act 1861, “whosoever shall unlawfully, by force or fraud, lead or take away or decoy or entice away or detain any child under the age of fourteen years with intent to deprive any parent, guardian or other person having the lawful care or charge of such child of the possession of such child, or with intent to steal any article upon or about the person of such child, to whomsoever such article may belong, and whosoever shall with any such intent receive or harbour any such child, &c.,” shall be guilty of felony, and is liable to penal servitude for not more than seven years, or to imprisonment for any term not more than two years with or without hard labour. The abduction or unlawfully taking away an unmarried girl under sixteen out of the possession and against the will of her father or mother, or any other person having the lawful care or charge of her, is a misdemeanour under the same act. The term is used in much the same sense in the United States.
KIDNAPPING (from kid, a slang term for a child, and nap or nab, to steal), originally referred to the act of stealing and taking away children and others to serve as servants or laborers on American plantations. Blackstone defined it as the forcible abduction or stealing away of a man, woman, or child from their own country and sending them to another. The difference between kidnapping, abduction (q.v.), and false imprisonment is not significant; in fact, kidnapping can be seen as a type of assault and false imprisonment, made worse by the transfer of the person to a different location. However, in England, the term is more commonly used to refer to the offense of taking children away from their parents. According to the Offences against the Person Act 1861, “whoever unlawfully, by force or fraud, leads, takes away, decoys, entices away, or detains any child under the age of fourteen years with the intent to deprive any parent, guardian, or other person lawfully responsible for that child of their possession, or with the intent to steal any item on or around that child, regardless of ownership, and whoever, with any such intent, receives or harbors such a child, etc.,” shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by up to seven years of penal servitude, or imprisonment for up to two years, with or without hard labor. The unlawful abduction of an unmarried girl under sixteen from the custody and against the wishes of her father, mother, or any lawful guardian is considered a misdemeanor under the same act. The term is used in much the same way in the United States.
The kidnapping or forcible taking away of persons to serve at sea is treated under Impressment.
The kidnapping or forced abduction of people to serve at sea is covered under Impressment.

KIDNEY DISEASES.1 (For the anatomy of the kidneys, see Urinary System.) The results of morbid processes in the kidney may be grouped under three heads: the actual lesions produced, the effects of these on the composition of the urine, 785 and the effects of the kidney-lesion on the body at large. Affections of the kidney are congenital or acquired. When acquired they may be the result of a pathological process limited to the kidney, in which case they are spoken of as primary, or an accompaniment of disease in other parts of the body, when they may be spoken of as secondary.
KIDNEY DISEASES.1 (For the anatomy of the kidneys, see Urinary System.) The outcomes of diseases affecting the kidneys can be categorized into three areas: the actual damage caused, the impact of this damage on urine composition, 785 and the overall effects of kidney damage on the body. Kidney issues can be either congenital or acquired. When acquired, they can stem from a specific disease process that is localized to the kidneys, known as primary, or they can occur as a result of diseases affecting other parts of the body, referred to as secondary.
Congenital Affections.—The principal congenital affections are anomalies in the number or position of the kidneys or of their ducts; atrophy; cystic disease and growths. The most common abnormality is the existence of a single kidney; rarely a supernumerary kidney may be present. The presence of a single kidney may be due to failure of development, or to atrophy in foetal life; it may also be dependent on the fusion of originally separate kidneys in such a way as to lead to the formation of a horse-shoe kidney, the two organs being connected at their lower ends. In some cases of horse-shoe kidney the organs are united merely by fibrous tissue. Occasionally the two kidneys are fused end to end, with two ureters. A third variety is that where the fusion is more complete, producing a disk-like mass with two ureters. The kidneys may be situated in abnormal positions; thus they may be in front of the sacro-iliac articulation, in the pelvis, or in the iliac fossa. The importance of such displacements lies in the fact that the organs may be mistaken for tumours. In some cases atrophy is associated with mal-development, so that only the medullary portion of the kidney is developed; in others it is associated with arterial obstruction, and sometimes it may be dependent upon obstruction of the ureter. In congenital cystic disease the organ is transformed into a mass of cysts, and the enlargement of the kidneys may be so great as to produce difficulties in birth. The cystic degeneration is caused by obstruction of the uriniferous tubules or by anomalies in development, with persistence of portions of the Wolffian body. In some cases cystic degeneration is accompanied by anomalies in the ureters and in the arterial supply. Growths of the kidney are sometimes found in infants; they are usually malignant, and may consist of a peculiar form of sarcoma, which has been spoken of as rhabdo-sarcoma, owing to the presence in the mass of involuntary muscular fibres. The existence of these tumours is dependent on anomalies of development; the tissue which forms the primitive kidney belongs to the same layer as that which gives rise to the muscular system (mesoblast). Anomalies of the excretory ducts: in some cases the ureter is double, in others it is greatly dilated; in others the pelvis of the kidney may be greatly dilated, with or without dilatation of the ureter.
Congenital Affections.—The main congenital issues include anomalies in the number or position of the kidneys or their ducts; atrophy; cystic disease and growths. The most common abnormality is having a single kidney; occasionally, an extra kidney might be present. A single kidney can occur due to failure of development, atrophy during fetal growth, or the fusion of originally separate kidneys, resulting in a horse-shoe kidney, where the two organs are connected at their lower ends. In some horse-shoe kidney cases, the organs are just joined by fibrous tissue. Sometimes, the two kidneys are fused end to end, each having its own ureter. A third type involves more complete fusion, creating a disk-like mass with two ureters. The kidneys can also be located in abnormal positions; for instance, they may be in front of the sacro-iliac joint, in the pelvis, or in the iliac fossa. The significance of these displacements is that the organs might be mistaken for tumors. In some instances, atrophy is linked to developmental issues, leading to only the medullary part of the kidney forming; in other cases, it is linked to arterial blockages, and sometimes it can stem from ureter obstruction. In congenital cystic disease, the kidney is transformed into a mass of cysts, and the swelling of the kidneys can become so severe that it complicates childbirth. The cystic degeneration is caused by blocked uriniferous tubules or developmental anomalies, with portions of the Wolffian body remaining. In some situations, cystic degeneration is accompanied by abnormalities in the ureters and in the blood supply. Growths of the kidney can sometimes be found in infants; these are usually malignant and may consist of a unique type of sarcoma known as rhabdo-sarcoma, due to the presence of involuntary muscle fibers in the mass. The existence of these tumors is linked to developmental anomalies; the tissue that forms the primitive kidney originates from the same layer as that which forms the muscular system (mesoblast). Anomalies of the excretory ducts: in some cases, the ureter is duplicated, in others, it is significantly enlarged; sometimes, the kidney's pelvis may be greatly expanded, with or without the ureter also being enlarged.
Acquired Affections. Movable Kidney.—One or both of the kidneys in the adult may be preternaturally mobile. This condition is more common in women, and is usually the result of a severe shaking or other form of injury, or of the abdominal walls becoming lax as a sequel to abdominal distension, to emaciation or pregnancy, or to the effects of tight-lacing. The more extreme forms of movable kidney are dependent, generally, on anomalies in the arrangement of the peritoneum, so that the organ has a partial mesentery; and to this condition, where the kidney can be moved freely from one part of the abdomen to another, the term floating kidney is applied. But more usually the organ is loose under the peritoneum, and not efficiently supported in its fatty bed. Movable kidney produces a variety of symptoms, such as pain in the loin and back, faintness, nausea and vomiting—and the function of the organ may be seriously interfered with, owing to the ureter becoming kinked. In this way hydronephrosis, or distension of the kidney with urine, may be produced. The return of blood through the renal vein may also be hindered, and temporary vascular engorgement of the kidney, with haematuria, may be produced.
Acquired Affections. Movable Kidney.—One or both of the kidneys in adults can be unusually mobile. This condition is more common in women and usually results from severe shaking or other types of injury, or from the abdominal walls becoming loose due to abdominal swelling, weight loss, pregnancy, or tight-lacing. More extreme cases of movable kidney usually depend on abnormalities in the arrangement of the peritoneum, resulting in the kidney having a partial mesentery; this condition, where the kidney can be moved freely from one area of the abdomen to another, is called a floating kidney. Typically, however, the organ is loose under the peritoneum and not well-supported in its fatty tissue. Movable kidney can cause various symptoms, such as pain in the side and back, faintness, nausea, and vomiting—and the kidney’s function may be significantly affected due to kinking of the ureter. This can lead to hydronephrosis, or swelling of the kidney due to urine buildup. The return of blood through the renal vein may also be obstructed, leading to temporary swelling of the kidney and potential blood in the urine.
In some cases the movable kidney may be satisfactorily kept in its place by a pad and belt, but in other cases an operation has to be undertaken. This consists in exposing the kidney (generally the right) through an incision below the last rib, and fixing it in its proper position by several permanent sutures of silk or silkworm gut. The operation is neither difficult nor dangerous, and its results are excellent.
In some cases, a movable kidney can be effectively held in place with a pad and belt, but in other situations, surgery is necessary. This involves making an incision below the last rib to expose the kidney (usually the right one) and securing it in the correct position with several permanent stitches made of silk or silkworm gut. The surgery is neither complicated nor risky, and the outcomes are very good.
Embolism.—The arrangement of the blood-vessels of the kidney is peculiarly favourable to the production of wedge-shaped areas of necrosis, the result of a blocking by clots. Sometimes the clot is detached from the interior of the heart, the effect being an arrest of the circulation in the part of the kidney supplied by the blocked artery. In other cases, the plug is infective owing to the presence of septic micro-organisms, and this is likely to lead to the formation of small pyaemic abscesses. It is exceptional for the large branches of the renal artery to be blocked, so that the symptoms produced in the ordinary cases are only the temporary appearance of blood or albumen in the urine. Blocking of the main renal vessels as a result of disease of the walls of the vessels may lead to disorganization of the kidneys. Blocking of the veins, leading to extreme congestion of the kidney, also occurs. It is seen in cases of extreme weakness and wasting, sometimes in septic conditions, as in puerperal pyaemia, where a clot, formed first in one of the pelvic veins, may spread up the vena cava and secondarily block the renal veins. Thrombosis of the renal vein also occurs in malignant disease of the kidney and in certain forms of chronic Bright’s disease.
Embolism.—The structure of the blood vessels in the kidney makes it particularly prone to develop wedge-shaped areas of tissue death due to clots blocking the flow. Sometimes, the clot comes from inside the heart, which stops blood flow to the part of the kidney served by the blocked artery. In other cases, the clot can be infected because of septic microorganisms, potentially leading to small pyaemic abscesses. It's rare for the larger branches of the renal artery to get blocked, so the usual symptoms in these cases are just temporary blood or protein in the urine. Blockage of the main renal vessels due to vessel wall disease can cause severe damage to the kidneys. Vein blockages that lead to severe kidney congestion can also happen. This is often seen in cases of extreme weakness and weight loss, sometimes in septic conditions, like puerperal pyaemia, where a clot formed in the pelvic veins can travel up the vena cava and cause a blockage in the renal veins. Thrombosis of the renal vein also happens in malignant kidney disease and certain types of chronic Bright’s disease.
Passive congestion of the kidneys occurs in heart-diseases and lung-diseases, where the return of venous blood is interfered with. It may also be produced by tumours pressing on the vena cava. The engorged kidneys become brownish red, enlarged and fibroid, and they secrete a scanty, high-coloured urine.
Passive congestion of the kidneys happens in heart and lung diseases where the return of venous blood is obstructed. It can also be caused by tumors pressing on the vena cava. The swollen kidneys become brownish-red, enlarged, and fibrous, and they produce a small amount of dark-colored urine.
Active congestion is produced by the excretion in the urine of such materials as turpentine and cantharides and the toxins of various diseases. These irritants produce engorgement and inflammation of the kidney, much as they would that of any other structures with which they come in contact. Renal disturbance is often the result of the excretion of microbic poisons. Extreme congestion of the kidneys may be produced by exposure to cold, owing to some intimate relationship existing between the cutaneous and the renal vessels, the constriction of the one being accompanied by the dilatation of the other. Infective diseases, such as typhoid fever, pneumonia, scarlet fever, in fact, most acute specific diseases, produce during their height a temporary nephritis, not usually followed by permanent alteration in the kidney; but some acute diseases cause a nephritis which may lay the foundation of permanent renal disease. This is most common as a result of scarlet fever.
Active congestion happens when substances like turpentine and cantharides, along with toxins from various diseases, are expelled in the urine. These irritants cause swelling and inflammation of the kidneys, similar to how they would affect other structures they come into contact with. Renal issues often arise from the elimination of microbial toxins. Severe kidney congestion can result from cold exposure, due to the close relationship between the skin and kidney blood vessels, where the tightening of one is accompanied by the widening of the other. Infectious diseases, like typhoid fever, pneumonia, and scarlet fever—essentially most acute specific diseases—cause a temporary kidney inflammation during their peak, which typically doesn't lead to lasting damage; however, some acute illnesses can lead to kidney inflammation that may result in chronic renal disease. This is most frequently seen following scarlet fever.
Bright’s disease is the term applied to certain varieties of acute and chronic inflammation of the kidney. Three forms are usually recognized—acute, chronic and the granular or cirrhotic kidney. In the more common form of granular kidney the renal lesion is only part of a widespread affection involving the whole arterial system, and is not actually related to Bright’s disease. Chronic Bright’s disease is sometimes the sequel to acute Bright’s disease, but in a great number of cases the malady is chronic from the beginning. The lesions of the kidney are probably produced by irritation of the kidney-structures owing to the excretion of toxic substances either ingested or formed in the body; it is thought by some that the malady may arise as a result of exposure to cold. The principal causes of Bright’s disease are alcoholism, gout, pregnancy and the action of such poisons as lead; it may also occur as a sequel to acute diseases, such as scarlet fever. Persons following certain occupations are peculiarly liable to Bright’s disease, e.g. engineers who work in hot shops and pass out into the cold air scantily clothed; and painters, in whom the malady is dependent on the action of lead on the kidney. In the case of alcohol and lead the poison is ingested; in the case of scarlet fever, pneumonia, and perhaps pregnancy, the toxic agent causing the renal affection is formed in the body. In Bright’s disease all the elements of the kidney, the glomeruli, the tubular epithelium, and the interstitial tissue, are affected. When the disease follows scarlet fever, the glomerular structures are mostly affected, the capsules being thickened by fibrous tissue, and the glomerular tuft compressed and atrophied. The epithelium of the convoluted tubules undergoes degeneration; considerable quantities of it are shed, and form the well-known casts in the urine. The tubules become blocked by the epithelium, and distended with the pent-up urine; this is one cause of the increase in size that the kidneys undergo in certain forms of Bright’s disease. The lesions in the tubules and in the glomeruli are not generally uniform. The interstitial tissue is always affected, and exudation, proliferation and formation of fibrous tissue occur. In the granular and contracted kidney the lesion in the interstitial tissue reaches a high degree of development, little renal secreting tissue being left. Such tubules as remain are dilated, and the epithelium lining them is altered, the cells becoming hyaline and losing their structure. The vessels are narrowed owing to thickening of the subendothelial layer, and the muscular coat undergoes hypertrophic and fibroid changes, so that the vessels are abnormally rigid. When the overgrowth of fibrous tissue is considerable, the surface of the organ becomes uneven, and it is for this reason that the term granular kidney has been applied to the condition. In acute Bright’s disease the kidney is increased in size and engorged with blood, the changes described above being in active progress. In the chronic form the kidney may be large or small, and is usually white or mottled. If large, the cortex is thickened, pale and waxy, and the pyramids are congested; if small, the fibrous change has advanced and the cortex is diminished. Bright’s disease, both acute and chronic, is essentially a disease of the cortical secreting portion of the kidney. The true granular kidney, classified by some as a third variety, is usually part of a general arterial degeneration, the overgrowth of fibrous tissue in the kidney and the lesions in the arteries being well marked.
Bright’s disease refers to certain types of acute and chronic kidney inflammation. Three forms are typically recognized—acute, chronic, and granular or cirrhotic kidney. In the more common granular kidney form, the kidney damage is just part of a broader issue affecting the entire arterial system and isn’t actually related to Bright’s disease. Chronic Bright’s disease sometimes follows acute Bright’s disease, but in many cases, the condition is chronic from the start. The kidney damage is likely caused by irritation of kidney structures due to the excretion of toxic substances either taken in or produced in the body; some believe this condition may also result from exposure to cold. The main causes of Bright’s disease include alcoholism, gout, pregnancy, and exposure to poisons like lead; it can also occur as a follow-up to acute illnesses like scarlet fever. Certain professions are particularly vulnerable to Bright’s disease, such as engineers who work in hot environments and then go out into the cold with inadequate clothing, and painters, where the disease is linked to lead exposure affecting the kidneys. In cases of alcohol and lead, the poison is consumed; with illnesses like scarlet fever, pneumonia, and perhaps during pregnancy, the toxic agent causing kidney damage is produced in the body. In Bright’s disease, all kidney components—the glomeruli, tubular epithelium, and interstitial tissue—are impacted. When the disease follows scarlet fever, the glomerular structures are mainly affected; the capsules become thickened with fibrous tissue, and the glomerular tuft is compressed and atrophied. The lining of the convoluted tubules degenerates, shedding large amounts that form the well-known casts in the urine. The tubules can get blocked by this epithelium, swelling with trapped urine, which is one reason kidneys may enlarge in certain forms of Bright’s disease. The damage in the tubules and glomeruli is often not uniform. The interstitial tissue is always affected, leading to exudation, proliferation, and fibrous tissue formation. In granular and contracted kidneys, the lesions in the interstitial tissue are quite advanced, leaving little functional kidney tissue. The remaining tubules are dilated, and their lining epithelium is altered, with the cells becoming hyaline and losing their structure. The blood vessels are narrowed due to thickening of the subendothelial layer, and the muscular coat undergoes hypertrophy and fibroid changes, resulting in the vessels becoming abnormally stiff. When the fibrous tissue overgrowth is significant, the organ's surface becomes uneven, which is why the term granular kidney is used for this condition. In acute Bright’s disease, the kidney is enlarged and engorged with blood, with the changes described above actively occurring. In the chronic form, the kidney may be large or small and is usually white or mottled. If it's large, the cortex is thickened, pale, and waxy, with congested pyramids; if it's small, fibrous changes have progressed, and the cortex is reduced. Bright’s disease, both acute and chronic, primarily affects the cortical secreting part of the kidney. The true granular kidney, sometimes considered a third type, is typically associated with a general arterial degeneration, with significant fibrous tissue overgrowth in the kidney and notable arterial lesions.
The principal degenerations affecting the kidney are the fatty and the albuminoid. Fatty degeneration often reaches a high degree in alcoholics, where fatty degeneration of the heart and liver are also present. Albuminoid disease is frequently associated with some varieties of Bright’s disease, and is also seen as a result of chronic bone disease, or of long-continued suppuration involving other parts of the body, or of syphilis. It is due to irritation of the kidneys by toxic products.
The main types of kidney degeneration are fatty and albuminoid. Fatty degeneration often becomes quite severe in alcoholics, where fatty degeneration of the heart and liver is also common. Albuminoid disease is often linked to certain types of Bright’s disease and can also occur due to chronic bone disease, prolonged infections in other parts of the body, or syphilis. It occurs because the kidneys are irritated by toxic substances.
Growths of the Kidney.—The principal growths are tubercle, adenoma, sarcoma and carcinoma. In addition, fatty and fibrous growths, the nodules of glanders and the gummata of syphilis, may be mentioned. Tuberculous disease is sometimes primary; more frequently it is secondary to tubercle in other portions of the genito-urinary apparatus. The genito-urinary tract may be infected by 786 tubercle in two ways; ascending, in which the primary lesion is in the testicle, epididymis, or urinary bladder, the lesion travelling up by the ureter or the lymphatics to the kidney; descending, where the tubercle bacillus reaches the kidney through the blood-vessels. In the latter case, miliary tubercles, as scattered granules, are seen, especially in the cortex of the kidney; the lesion is likely to be bilateral. In primary tuberculosis, and in ascending tuberculosis, the lesion is at first unilateral. Malignant disease of the kidney takes the form of sarcoma or carcinoma. Sometimes it is dependent on the malignant growths starting in what are spoken of as “adrenal rests” in the cortex of the kidney. Sarcoma is most often seen in the young; carcinoma in the middle-aged and elderly. Carcinoma may be primary or secondary, but the kidney is not so prone to malignant disease as other organs, such as the stomach, bowel or liver.
Kidney Growths.—The main types of growths are tubercle, adenoma, sarcoma, and carcinoma. Additionally, fatty and fibrous growths, nodules from glanders, and gummata from syphilis can also occur. Tuberculosis can sometimes start in the kidney, but more often it's a result of tuberculosis spreading from other areas of the genito-urinary system. The genito-urinary tract can be infected by 786 tuberculosis in two ways: ascending, where the primary infection is in the testicle, epididymis, or urinary bladder, and it travels up through the ureter or lymphatics to the kidney; descending, where the tubercle bacillus reaches the kidney via the blood vessels. In the latter case, small tubercles appear as scattered spots, particularly in the outer layer of the kidney, and it is likely to be bilateral. In primary tuberculosis and ascending tuberculosis, the infection is initially unilateral. Malignant kidney disease manifests as either sarcoma or carcinoma. Sometimes it's linked to malignant growths that originate in what are referred to as "adrenal rests" in the kidney's cortex. Sarcoma tends to occur more often in younger individuals, while carcinoma is seen more in middle-aged and older adults. Carcinoma can be primary or secondary, but the kidney is less susceptible to malignant diseases compared to other organs like the stomach, bowel, or liver.
Cystic Kidneys.—Cysts may be single—sometimes of large size. Scattered small cysts are met with in chronic Bright’s disease and in granular contracted kidney, where the dilatation of tubules reaches a high degree. Certain growths, such as adenomata, are liable to cystic degeneration, and cysts are also found in malignant disease. Finally, there is a rare condition of general cystic disease somewhat similar to the congenital affection. In this form the kidneys, greatly enlarged, consist of a congeries of cysts separated by the remains of renal tissue.
Cystic Kidneys.—Cysts can be single—sometimes quite large. You can also find scattered small cysts in chronic Bright’s disease and in granular contracted kidney, where the dilation of tubules is significantly high. Certain types of growths, like adenomas, are prone to cystic degeneration, and cysts can also occur in malignant conditions. Lastly, there is a rare condition of general cystic disease, somewhat similar to the congenital form. In this case, the kidneys are greatly enlarged and consist of a cluster of cysts separated by remnants of renal tissue.
Parasitic Affections.—The more common parasites affecting the kidney, or some other portion of the urinary tract, and causing disease, are filaria, bilharzia and the cysticercus form of the taenia echinococcus (hydatids). The presence of filaria in the thoracic duct and other lymph-channels may determine the presence of chyle in the urine, together with the ova and young forms of the filaria, owing to the distension and rupture of a lymphatic vessel into some portion of the urinary tract. This is the common cause of chyluria in hot climates, but chyluria is occasionally seen in the United Kingdom without filaria. Bilharzia, especially in Egypt and South Africa, causes haematuria. The cysticercus form of the taenia echinococcus leads to the production of hydatid cysts in the kidney; this organ, however, is not so often affected as the liver.
Parasitic Infections.—The more common parasites that impact the kidney or other parts of the urinary tract and cause disease include filaria, bilharzia, and the cysticercus form of the taenia echinococcus (hydatids). The presence of filaria in the thoracic duct and other lymph channels can lead to chyle appearing in the urine, along with the eggs and young forms of the filaria, due to the swelling and rupture of a lymphatic vessel into a part of the urinary tract. This is the usual cause of chyluria in hot climates, but chyluria can sometimes be seen in the United Kingdom without the presence of filaria. Bilharzia, especially in Egypt and South Africa, causes blood in the urine (haematuria). The cysticercus form of the taenia echinococcus can produce hydatid cysts in the kidney; however, this organ is not affected as frequently as the liver.
Stone in the Kidney.—Calculi are frequently found in the kidney, consisting usually of uric acid, sometimes of oxalates, more rarely of phosphates. Calculous disease of the bladder (q.v.) is generally the sequel to the formation of a stone in the kidney, which, passing down, becomes coated by the salts in the urine. Calculi are usually formed in the pelvis of the kidney, and their formation is dependent either on the excessive amounts of uric acid, oxalic acid, &c., in the urine, or on an alteration in the composition of the urine, such as increased acidity, or on uric acid or oxalate of lime being present in an abnormal amount. The formation of abnormal crystals is often due to the presence of some colloid, such as blood, mucus or albumen, in the secretion, modifying the crystalline form. Once a minute calculus has been formed, its subsequent growth is highly probable, owing to the deposition on it of the urinary constituent forming it. Calculi formed in the pelvis of the kidney may be single and may reach a very large size, forming, indeed, an actual cast of the interior of the expanded kidney. At other times they are multiple and of varying size. They may give rise to no symptoms, or on the other hand may cause distressing renal colic, especially when they are small and loose and are passed or are trying to be passed. Serious complications may result from the presence of a stone in the kidney, such as hydronephrosis, from the urinary secretion being pent up behind the obstruction, or complete suppression, which is apparently produced reflexly through the nervous system. In such cases the surgical removal of the stone is often followed by the restoration of the renal secretion.
Kidney Stones.—Stones are often found in the kidney, usually made of uric acid, sometimes of oxalates, and rarely of phosphates. Bladder stone disease (q.v.) usually follows the formation of a kidney stone, which, when it moves down, gets coated by salts in the urine. Stones typically form in the kidney's pelvis, and their formation is influenced by high levels of uric acid, oxalic acid, etc., in the urine, changes in urine composition, like increased acidity, or abnormal amounts of uric acid or calcium oxalate. Abnormal crystal formation is often due to the presence of some colloid, like blood, mucus, or albumin, in the secretion, altering the crystal structure. Once a small stone has formed, it's likely to grow due to the deposition of urinary components that make it up. Stones in the kidney's pelvis can be single and quite large, potentially casting the shape of the expanded kidney. At other times, they can be multiple and vary in size. They may cause no symptoms, or they can lead to painful renal colic, especially when they're small and loose as they try to pass. Serious complications may arise from a stone in the kidney, such as hydronephrosis, due to urine being trapped behind an obstruction, or complete suppression, which seems to be triggered reflexively through the nervous system. In such cases, surgically removing the stone often restores kidney function.
The symptoms of renal calculus may be very slight, or they may be entirely absent if the stone is moulding itself into the interior of the kidney; but if the stone is movable, heavy and rough, it may cause great distress, especially during exercise. There will probably be blood in the urine; and there will be pain in the loin and thigh and down into the testicle. The testicle also may be drawn up by its suspensory muscle, and there may be irritability of the bladder. With stone in one kidney the pains may be actually referred to the kidney of the other side. Generally, but not always, there is tenderness in the loin. If the stone is composed of lime it may throw a shadow on the Röntgen plate, but other stones may give no shadow.
The symptoms of renal calculus can be very mild, or they might not show at all if the stone is fitting comfortably inside the kidney. However, if the stone is movable, heavy, and rough, it can cause significant discomfort, especially during physical activity. You might notice blood in the urine, along with pain in the lower back and thigh, extending into the testicle. The testicle may also be pulled up by its suspensory muscle, and there may be bladder irritation. If there’s a stone in one kidney, the pain can also be felt in the other kidney. Generally, but not always, there is tenderness in the lower back. If the stone is made of lime, it may cast a shadow on an X-ray, but other types of stones may not show any shadow.
Renal colic is the acute pain felt when a small stone is travelling down the ureter to the bladder. The pain is at times so acute that fomentations, morphia and hot baths fail to ease it, and nothing short of chloroform gives relief.
Renal colic is the sharp pain experienced when a small stone moves down the ureter to the bladder. The pain can be so intense that heat, morphine, and hot baths do not relieve it, and only chloroform provides relief.
For the operative treatment of renal calculus an incision is made a little below the last rib, and, the muscles having been traversed, the kidney is reached on the surface which is not covered by peritoneum. Most likely the stone is then felt, so it is cut down upon and removed. If it is not discoverable on gently pinching the kidney between the finger and thumb, the kidney had better be opened in its convex border and explored by the finger. Often it has happened that when a man has presented most of the symptoms of renal calculus and has been operated on with a negative result as regards finding a stone, all the symptoms have nevertheless disappeared as the direct result of the blank operation.
For the operative treatment of kidney stones, an incision is made just below the last rib, and after cutting through the muscles, the kidney is accessed on the area that's not covered by the peritoneum. Usually, the stone can be felt, so it is then cut into and removed. If it's not found by gently squeezing the kidney between the fingers and thumb, it's better to open the kidney at its rounded edge and explore it with a finger. It often happens that when someone shows most of the symptoms of kidney stones and has surgery without finding a stone, all the symptoms disappear nonetheless as a direct result of the surgery.
Pyelitis.—Inflammation of the pelvis of the kidney is generally produced by the extension of gonorrhoeal or other septic inflammation upwards from the bladder and lower urinary tract, or by the presence of stone or of tubercle in the pelvis of the kidney. Pyonephrosis, or distension of the kidney with pus, may result as a sequel to pyelitis or as a complication of hydronephrosis; in many cases the inflammation spreads to the capsule of the kidney, and leads to the formation of an abscess outside the kidney—a perinephritic abscess. In some cases a perinephritic abscess results from a septic plug in a blood-vessel of the kidney, or it may occur as the result of an injury to the loose cellular tissue surrounding the kidney, without lesion of the kidney.
Pyelitis.—Inflammation of the kidney pelvis usually happens when infections, such as gonorrhea or other septic conditions, spread upward from the bladder and lower urinary tract, or due to the presence of a stone or tuberculosis in the kidney pelvis. Pyonephrosis, which is the swelling of the kidney with pus, can occur as a consequence of pyelitis or as a complication of hydronephrosis. In many instances, the inflammation extends to the kidney capsule, leading to the formation of an abscess outside the kidney—known as a perinephritic abscess. In some cases, a perinephritic abscess can result from a septic blockage in a kidney blood vessel, or it may occur due to an injury to the loose connective tissue around the kidney, without damaging the kidney itself.
Hydronephrosis, or distension of the kidney with pent-up urine, results from obstruction of the ureter, although all obstructions of the ureter are not followed by it, calculous obstruction, as already noted, often causing complete suppression of urine. Obstruction of the ureter, causing hydronephrosis, is likely to be due to the impaction of a stone, or to pressure on the ureter from a tumour in the pelvis—as, for instance, a cancer of the uterus—or to some abnormality of the ureter. Sometimes a kink of the ureter of a movable kidney causes hydronephrosis. The hydronephrosis produced by obstruction of the ureter may be intermittent; and when a certain degree of distension is produced, either as a result of the shifting of the calculus or of some other cause, the obstruction is temporarily relieved in a great outflow of urine, and the urinary discharge is re-established. When the hydronephrosis has long existed the kidney is converted into a sac, the remains of the renal tissues being spread out as a thin layer.
Hydronephrosis, or swelling of the kidney due to trapped urine, happens when the ureter is blocked. However, not all ureter blockages lead to this condition. A blockage caused by a stone often leads to a complete halt in urine production. The obstruction that leads to hydronephrosis is usually caused by a stone getting stuck or by pressure on the ureter from a tumor in the pelvis, such as uterine cancer, or due to some irregularity in the ureter itself. Occasionally, a bend in the ureter from a movable kidney can cause hydronephrosis. The hydronephrosis caused by ureter obstruction can be intermittent; when a certain level of swelling occurs, either from the movement of the stone or another reason, the blockage can be temporarily relieved, resulting in a large outflow of urine, and normal urination resumes. If hydronephrosis persists for a long time, the kidney may turn into a pouch, with the remaining renal tissue spread out as a thin layer.
Effects on the Urine.—Diseases of the kidney produce alterations in the composition of the urine; either the proportion of the normal constituents being altered, or substances not normally present being excreted. In most diseases the quantity of urinary water is diminished, especially in those in which the activity of the circulation is impaired. There are diseases, however, more especially the granular kidney and certain forms of chronic Bright’s disease, in which the quantity of urinary water is considerably increased, notwithstanding the profound anatomical changes that have occurred in the kidney. There are two forms of suppression of the urine: one is obstructive suppression, seen where the ureter is blocked by stone or other morbid process; the other is non-obstructive suppression, which is apt to occur in advanced diseases of the kidney. In other cases complete suppression may occur as the result of injuries to distant parts of the body, as after severe surgical operations. In some diseases in which the quantity of urinary water excreted is normal, or even greater than normal, the efficiency of the renal activity is really diminished, inasmuch as the urine contains few solids. In estimating the efficiency of the kidneys, it is necessary to take into consideration the so-called “solid urine,” that is to say, the quantity of solid matter daily excreted, as shown by the specific gravity of the urine. The nitrogenous constituents—urea, uric acid, creatinin, &c.—vary greatly in amount in different diseases. In most renal diseases the quantities of these substances are diminished because of the physiological impairment of the kidney. The chief abnormal constituents of the urine are serum-albumen, serum-globulin, albumoses (albuminuria), blood (haematuria), blood pigment (haemoglobinuria), pus (pyuria), chyle (chyluria) and pigments such as melanuria and urobilinuria.
Effects on the Urine.—Kidney diseases change the makeup of urine, either by altering the amounts of normal components or leading to the excretion of substances that shouldn’t normally be present. In most conditions, the amount of urine produced decreases, especially when circulation is compromised. However, there are conditions, particularly granular kidney and certain types of chronic Bright’s disease, where urine production significantly increases, despite severe structural changes in the kidneys. There are two types of urine suppression: one is obstructive suppression, which occurs when the ureter is blocked by a stone or another pathological process; the other is non-obstructive suppression, often seen in advanced kidney diseases. Complete suppression can also happen due to injuries to other body parts, such as after major surgeries. In some illnesses where the volume of urine is normal or even higher than normal, the kidneys' effectiveness is actually reduced because the urine has less solid material. To assess kidney function, it’s important to consider the so-called "solid urine," which refers to the daily amount of solid wastes, indicated by the specific gravity of the urine. The nitrogenous compounds—urea, uric acid, creatinine, etc.—can vary widely depending on the disease. In most kidney diseases, these substances are reduced because of the kidney's impaired function. The main abnormal components found in urine include serum-albumin, serum-globulin, albumoses (albuminuria), blood (haematuria), blood pigment (haemoglobinuria), pus (pyuria), chyle (chyluria), and pigments like melanuria and urobilinuria.
Effects on the Body at large.—These may be divided into the persistent and the intermittent or transitory. The most important persistent effects produced by disease of the kidney are, first, nutritional changes leading to general ill health, wasting and cachexia; and, secondly, certain cardio-vascular phenomena, such as enlargement (hypertrophy) of the heart, and thickening of the inner, and degeneration of the middle, coat of the smaller arteries. Amongst the intermittent or transitory effects are dropsy, secondary inflammations of certain organs and serous cavities, and uraemia. Some of these effects are seen in every form of severe kidney disease, and uraemia may occur in any advanced kidney disease. Renal dropsy is chiefly seen in certain forms of Bright’s disease, and the cardiac and arterial changes are commonest in cases of granular or contracted kidney, but may be absent in other diseases which destroy the kidney tissue, such as hydronephrosis. Uraemia is a toxic condition, and three varieties of it are recognized—the acute, the chronic and the latent. Many of these effects are dependent upon the action of poisons retained in the body owing to the deficient action of the kidneys. It is also probable that abnormal substances having a toxic action are produced as a result of a perverted metabolism. Uraemia is of toxic origin, and it is probable that the dropsy of renal disease is due to effects produced in the capillaries by the presence of abnormal substances in the blood. High arterial tension, cardiac hypertrophy and arterial degeneration may also be of toxic origin, or they may be produced by an attempt of the body to maintain an active circulation through the greatly diminished amount of kidney tissue available.
Effects on the Body at Large.—These can be divided into persistent and intermittent or temporary effects. The main persistent effects caused by kidney disease are, first, nutritional changes that lead to overall poor health, weight loss, and cachexia; and, second, certain cardiovascular issues, such as an enlarged heart (hypertrophy) and thickening of the inner layer, along with degeneration of the middle layer, of the smaller arteries. Among the intermittent or temporary effects are swelling (dropsy), secondary inflammation in certain organs and fluid-filled spaces, and uremia. Some of these effects occur in every type of severe kidney disease, and uremia can happen in any advanced kidney disease. Renal dropsy is primarily seen in specific forms of Bright’s disease, while cardiac and arterial changes are most common in cases of granular or contracted kidneys, but may be absent in other conditions that damage kidney tissue, like hydronephrosis. Uremia is a toxic condition, and there are three recognized types of it—the acute, chronic, and latent forms. Many of these effects result from the action of toxins retained in the body due to the kidneys not functioning properly. It’s also likely that abnormal substances with toxic effects are produced as a result of disrupted metabolism. Uremia has a toxic origin, and it’s likely that the swelling in kidney disease is caused by effects in the capillaries due to the presence of abnormal substances in the blood. High blood pressure, heart enlargement, and artery degeneration may also be of toxic origin, or they might arise from the body’s effort to maintain active circulation despite the significantly reduced amount of functioning kidney tissue.
Rupture of the kidney may result from a kick or other direct injury. Vomiting and collapse are likely to ensue, and most likely blood will appear in the urine, or a tumour composed of blood and urine may form in the renal region. An incision made into the swelling from the loin may enable the surgeon to see the torn kidney. An attempt should be made to save the kidney by suturing and draining; unless 787 the damage is obviously past repair, the kidney should not be removed without giving nature a chance.
A kidney rupture can happen from a kick or another direct injury. Vomiting and collapse are likely to occur, and blood will probably show up in the urine, or a mass made of blood and urine could form in the kidney area. Making an incision into the swelling from the side might allow the surgeon to see the damaged kidney. Efforts should be made to save the kidney by stitching and draining it; unless 787 the damage is clearly beyond repair, the kidney shouldn't be removed without giving nature a chance.
1 The word “kidney” first appears in the early part of the 14th century in the form kidenei, with plural kideneiren, kideneris, kidneers, &c. It has been assumed that the second part of the word is “neer” or “near” (cf. Ger. Niere), the common dialect word for “kidney” in northern, north midland and eastern counties of England (see J. Wright, English Dialect Dictionary, 1903, s.v. Near), and that the first part represents the O.E. cwið, belly, womb; this the New English Dictionary considers improbable; there is only one doubtful instance of singular kidnere and the ordinary form ended in -ei or ey. Possibly this represents M.E. ey, plur. eyren, egg, the name being given from the resemblance in shape. The first part is uncertain.
1 The word “kidney” first showed up in the early 14th century as kidenei, with the plural forms kideneiren, kideneris, kidneers, etc. It's believed that the second part of the word is “neer” or “near” (see Ger. Niere), which is the common dialect word for “kidney” in the northern, north midland, and eastern counties of England (refer to J. Wright, English Dialect Dictionary, 1903, s.v. Near). The first part likely comes from the O.E. cwið, meaning belly or womb; however, the New English Dictionary finds this idea unlikely. There’s only one questionable example of singular kidnere, and the standard form typically ended in -ei or ey. It’s possible that this reflects M.E. ey, plural eyren, meaning egg, with the name coming from the similar shape. The origin of the first part is uncertain.

KIDWELLY (Cydweli), a decayed market-town and municipal borough of Carmarthenshire, Wales, situated (as its name implies) near the junction of two streams, the Gwendraeth Fawr and the Gwendraeth Fach, a short distance from the shores of Carmarthen Bay. Pop. (1901), 2285. It has a station on the Great Western railway. The chief attraction of Kidwelly is its magnificent and well-preserved castle, one of the finest in South Wales, dating chiefly from the 13th century and admirably situated on a knoll above the Gwendraeth Fach. The parish church of St Mary, of the 14th century, possesses a lofty tower with a spire. The quiet little town has had a stirring history. It was a place of some importance when William de Londres, a companion of Fitz Hamon and his conquering knights, first erected a castle here. In 1135 Kidwelly was furiously attacked by Gwenllian, wife of Griffith ap Rhys, prince of South Wales, and a battle, fought close to the town at a place still known as Maes Gwenllian, ended in the total defeat and subsequent execution of the Welsh princess. Later, the extensive lordship of Kidwelly became the property through marriage of Henry, earl of Lancaster, and to this circumstance is due the exclusive jurisdiction of the town. Kidwelly received its first charter of incorporation from Henry VI.; its present charter dating from 1618. The decline of Kidwelly is due to the accumulation of sand at the mouth of the river, and to the consequent prosperity of the neighbouring Llanelly.
KIDWELLY (Cydweli), a faded market town and municipal borough in Carmarthenshire, Wales, located (as the name suggests) near the junction of two streams, the Gwendraeth Fawr and the Gwendraeth Fach, just a short distance from the shores of Carmarthen Bay. Population (1901), 2,285. It has a station on the Great Western Railway. The main attraction of Kidwelly is its stunning and well-preserved castle, one of the best in South Wales, primarily dating from the 13th century and beautifully positioned on a hill above the Gwendraeth Fach. The parish church of St Mary, from the 14th century, features a tall tower with a spire. This quiet little town has a vibrant history. It was significant when William de Londres, a companion of Fitz Hamon and his conquering knights, first built a castle here. In 1135, Kidwelly was fiercely attacked by Gwenllian, the wife of Griffith ap Rhys, prince of South Wales, and a battle fought near the town at a site still known as Maes Gwenllian ended in the total defeat and later execution of the Welsh princess. Later, the large lordship of Kidwelly became the property of Henry, earl of Lancaster, through marriage, which is why the town has exclusive jurisdiction. Kidwelly received its first charter of incorporation from Henry VI, with its current charter dating from 1618. The decline of Kidwelly is attributed to the buildup of sand at the river's mouth, leading to the prosperity of the nearby Llanelly.

KIEF, Kef or Keif (a colloquial form of the Arabic kaif, pleasure or enjoyment), the state of drowsy contentment produced by the use of narcotics. To “do kef,” or to “make kef,” is to pass the time in such a state. The word is used in northern Africa, especially in Morocco, for the drug used for the purpose.
KIEF, Kef or Keef (a slang form of the Arabic kaif, meaning pleasure or enjoyment), describes the drowsy contentment that comes from using drugs. To "do kef" or "make kef" means to spend time in that relaxed state. The term is commonly used in northern Africa, especially in Morocco, to refer to the drug used for that purpose.

KIEL, the chief naval port of Germany on the Baltic, a town of the Prussian province of Schleswig-Holstein. Pop. (1900), 107,938; (1905), 163,710, including the incorporated suburbs. It is beautifully situated at the southern end on the Kieler Busen (bay or harbour of Kiel), 70 m. by rail N. from Hamburg. It consists of a somewhat cramped old town, lying between the harbour and a sheet of water called Kleiner Kiel, and a better built and more spacious new town, which has been increased by the incorporation of the garden suburbs of Brunswick and Düsternbrook. In the old town stands the palace, built in the 13th century, enlarged in the 18th and restored after a fire in 1838. It was once the seat of the dukes of Holstein-Gottorp, who resided here from 1721 to 1773, and became the residence of Prince Henry of Prussia. Other buildings are the church of St Nicholas (restored in 1877-1884), dating from 1240, with a lofty steeple; the old town-hall on the market square; the church of the Holy Ghost; three fine modern churches, those of St James, and St Jürgen and of St Ansgar; and the theatre. Further to the north and facing the bay is the university, founded in 1665 by Christian Albert, duke of Schleswig, and named after him “Christian Albertina.” The new buildings were erected in 1876, and connected with them are a library of 240,000 volumes, a zoological museum, a hospital, a botanical garden and a school of forestry. The university, which is celebrated as a medical school, is attended by nearly 1000 students, and has a teaching staff of over 100 professors and docents. Among other scientific and educational institutions are the Schleswig-Holstein museum of national antiquities in the old university buildings, the Thaulow museum (rich in Schleswig-Holstein wood-carving of the 16th and 17th centuries), the naval academy, the naval school and the school for engineers.
KIEL, is the main naval port of Germany on the Baltic Sea, located in the Prussian province of Schleswig-Holstein. Population: (1900) 107,938; (1905) 163,710, including the neighboring suburbs. It's beautifully located at the southern end of the Kieler Busen (bay or harbor of Kiel), 70 miles by rail north of Hamburg. The city features an older, somewhat cramped town positioned between the harbor and a body of water known as Kleiner Kiel, along with a newer, better designed, and more spacious town, which has expanded through the inclusion of the garden suburbs of Brunswick and Düsternbrook. In the old town, you'll find a palace built in the 13th century, expanded in the 18th century, and restored after a fire in 1838. This palace was once the home of the dukes of Holstein-Gottorp, who lived here from 1721 to 1773, and it became the residence of Prince Henry of Prussia. Other notable buildings include the church of St. Nicholas (restored between 1877 and 1884), which dates back to 1240 and has a tall steeple; the old town hall on the market square; the church of the Holy Ghost; three impressive modern churches—St. James, St. Jürgen, and St. Ansgar; and the theater. Further to the north, facing the bay, is the university, founded in 1665 by Christian Albert, duke of Schleswig, and named in his honor “Christian Albertina.” The new buildings were constructed in 1876 and include a library with 240,000 volumes, a zoological museum, a hospital, a botanical garden, and a forestry school. The university is well-known for its medical school, attended by nearly 1,000 students with a teaching staff of over 100 professors and lecturers. Additional scientific and educational institutions include the Schleswig-Holstein museum of national antiquities in the old university buildings, the Thaulow museum (home to an impressive collection of Schleswig-Holstein wood carvings from the 16th and 17th centuries), the naval academy, the naval school, and the engineering school.
The pride of Kiel is its magnificent harbour, which has a comparatively uniform depth of water, averaging 40 ft., and close to the shores 20 ft. Its length is 11 m. and its breadth varies from ¼ m. at the southern end to 4½ m. at the mouth. Its defences, which include two forts on the west and four on the east side, all situated about 5 m. from the head of the harbour at the place (Friedrichsort) where its shores approach one another, make it a place of great strategic strength. The imperial docks (five in all) and ship-building yards are on the east side facing the town, between Gaarden and Ellerbeck, and comprise basins capable of containing the largest war-ships afloat. The imperial yard employs 7000 hands, and another 7000 are employed in two large private ship-building works, the Germania (Krupp’s) and Howalds’. The Kaiser Wilhelm Canal, commonly called the Kiel Canal, connecting the Baltic with the North Sea at Brunsbüttel, has its eastern entrance at Wik, 1½ m. N. of Kiel (see Germany: Waterways). The town and adjacent villages, e.g. Wik, Heikendorf and Laboe, are resorted to for sea-bathing, and in June of each year a regatta, attended by yachts from all countries, is held. The Kieler Woche is one of the principal social events in Germany, and corresponds to the “Cowes week” in England. Kiel is connected by day and night services with Korsör in Denmark by express passenger boats. The harbour yields sprats which are in great repute. The principal industries are those connected with the imperial navy and ship-building, but embrace also flour-mills, oil-works, iron-foundries, printing-works, saw-mills, breweries, brick-works, soap-making and fish-curing. There is an important trade in coal, timber, cereals, fish, butter and cheese.
The pride of Kiel is its impressive harbor, which has a relatively consistent water depth, averaging 40 ft., and close to the shores, 20 ft. It stretches 11 miles long and varies in width from ¼ mile at the southern end to 4½ miles at the mouth. Its defenses, which include two forts on the west and four on the east side, all located about 5 miles from the head of the harbor at Friedrichsort where the shores come close together, give it significant strategic strength. The imperial docks, totaling five, and shipyards are located on the east side facing the town, between Gaarden and Ellerbeck, and feature basins large enough to accommodate the biggest warships. The imperial yard employs 7,000 workers, with another 7,000 working in two large private shipyards, Germania (Krupp’s) and Howalds’. The Kaiser Wilhelm Canal, commonly known as the Kiel Canal, connects the Baltic Sea with the North Sea at Brunsbüttel, with its eastern entrance at Wik, 1½ miles north of Kiel (see Germany: Waterways). The town and nearby villages, such as Wik, Heikendorf, and Laboe, are popular for sea-bathing, and every June, a regatta featuring yachts from all over the world is held. The Kieler Woche is one of the major social events in Germany, similar to the “Cowes week” in England. Kiel is connected by day and night services to Korsør in Denmark through express passenger boats. The harbor produces sprats that are highly regarded. The main industries are those related to the imperial navy and shipbuilding but also include flour mills, oil works, iron foundries, printing presses, sawmills, breweries, brickworks, soap-making, and fish-curing. There is also a significant trade in coal, timber, cereals, fish, butter, and cheese.
The name of Kiel appears as early as the 10th century in the form Kyl (probably from the Anglo-Saxon Kille = a safe place for ships). Kiel is mentioned as a city in the next century; in 1242 it received the Lübeck rights; in the 14th century it acquired various trading privileges, having in 1284 entered the Hanseatic League. In recent times Kiel has been associated with the peace concluded in January 1814 between Great Britain, Denmark and Sweden, by which Norway was ceded to Sweden. In 1773 Kiel became part of Denmark, and in 1866 it passed with the rest of Schleswig-Holstein to Prussia. Since being made a great naval arsenal, Kiel has rapidly developed in prosperity and population.
The name Kiel dates back to the 10th century when it appeared as Kyl (likely from the Anglo-Saxon Kille meaning a safe harbor for ships). Kiel was recognized as a city in the following century; in 1242, it was granted the Lübeck rights, and in the 14th century, it gained various trading privileges after joining the Hanseatic League in 1284. More recently, Kiel has been linked to the peace agreement made in January 1814 between Great Britain, Denmark, and Sweden, which resulted in Norway being ceded to Sweden. In 1773, Kiel became part of Denmark, and in 1866, it transferred to Prussia along with the rest of Schleswig-Holstein. Since becoming a major naval base, Kiel has experienced significant growth in both prosperity and population.
See Prahl, Chronika der Stadt Kiel (Kiel, 1856); Erichsen, Topographie des Landkreises Kiel (Kiel, 1898); H. Eckardt, Alt-Kiel in Wort und Bild (Kiel, 1899); P. Hasse, Das Kieler Stadtbuch, 1264-1289 (Kiel, 1875); Das älteste Kieler Rentebuch 1300, 1487, edited by C. Reuter (Kiel, 1893); Das zweite Kieler Rentebuch 1487, 1586, edited by W. Stern (Kiel, 1904); and the Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Kieler Stadtgeschichte (Kiel, 1877, 1904).
See Prahl, Chronika der Stadt Kiel (Kiel, 1856); Erichsen, Topographie des Landkreises Kiel (Kiel, 1898); H. Eckardt, Alt-Kiel in Wort und Bild (Kiel, 1899); P. Hasse, Das Kieler Stadtbuch, 1264-1289 (Kiel, 1875); Das älteste Kieler Rentebuch 1300, 1487, edited by C. Reuter (Kiel, 1893); Das zweite Kieler Rentebuch 1487, 1586, edited by W. Stern (Kiel, 1904); and the Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Kieler Stadtgeschichte (Kiel, 1877, 1904).

KIELCE, a government in the south-west of Russian Poland, surrounded by the governments of Piotrkow and Radom and by Austrian Galicia. Area, 3896 sq. m. Its surface is an elevated plateau 800 to 1000 ft. in altitude, intersected in the north-east by a range of hills reaching 1350 ft. and deeply trenched in the south. It is drained by the Vistula on its south-east border, and by its tributaries, the Nida and the Pilica, which have a very rapid fall and give rise to inundations. Silurian and Devonian quartzites, dolomite, limestones and sandstones prevail in the north, and contain rich iron ores, lead and copper ores. Carboniferous deposits containing rich coal seams occur chiefly in the south, and extend into the government of Piotrkow. Permian limestones and sandstones exist in the south. The Triassic deposits contain very rich zinc ores of considerable thickness and lead. The Jurassic deposits consist of iron-clays and limestones, containing large caves. The Cretaceous deposits yield gypsum, chalk and sulphur. White and black marble are also extracted. The soil is of great variety and fertile in parts, but owing to the proximity of the Carpathians, the climate is more severe than might be expected. Rye, wheat, oats, barley and buckwheat are grown; modern intensive culture is spreading, and land fetches high prices, the more so as the peasants’ allotments were small at the outset and are steadily decreasing. Out of a total of 2,193,300 acres suitable for cultivation 53.4% are actually cultivated. Grain is exported. Gardening is a thriving industry in the south; beet is grown for sugar in the south-east. Industries are considerably developed: zinc ores are extracted, as well as some iron and a little sulphur. Tiles, metallic goods, leather, timber goods and flour are the chief products of the manufactures. Pop. (1897), 765,212, for the most part Poles, with 11% Jews; (1906, estimated), 910,900. By religion 88% of the people are Roman Catholics. Kielce is divided into seven districts, the chief towns of which, with 788 populations in 1897, are Kielce (q.v.), Jedrzejow (Russ. Andreyev, 5010), Miechow (4156), Olkusz (3491), Pinczów (8095), Stopnica (4659) and Wloszczowa (23,065).
KIELCE, is a province in the southwest of Russian Poland, bordered by the provinces of Piotrkow and Radom and by Austrian Galicia. Its area is 3,896 square miles. The land is an elevated plateau, ranging from 800 to 1,000 feet in altitude, with hills in the northeast rising to 1,350 feet and deep valleys in the south. It is drained by the Vistula River along its southeast edge and by its tributaries, the Nida and the Pilica, which have a steep gradient and can cause flooding. The northern region is dominated by Silurian and Devonian quartzites, dolomite, limestones, and sandstones that contain rich deposits of iron, lead, and copper ores. Carboniferous layers in the south have substantial coal seams that extend into the province of Piotrkow. Permian limestones and sandstones are also found in the southern part. The Triassic deposits hold significant zinc ores and lead. Jurassic layers include iron clays and limestones, featuring large caves. Cretaceous deposits produce gypsum, chalk, and sulfur. Both white and black marble are extracted as well. The soil varies greatly and is fertile in some areas, but due to the nearby Carpathians, the climate is harsher than expected. Rye, wheat, oats, barley, and buckwheat are cultivated; modern intensive farming practices are on the rise, and land prices are high, especially since peasants’ parcels were initially small and are continually shrinking. Out of a total of 2,193,300 acres that can be farmed, 53.4% is actually under cultivation. Grain is exported. Gardening thrives in the south, with sugar beets grown in the southeast. The industrial sector is quite developed: zinc ores are mined, along with some iron and a bit of sulfur. The main manufactured products include tiles, metal goods, leather, timber products, and flour. The population in 1897 was 765,212, mostly Poles, with 11% Jews; an estimated 910,900 in 1906. By religion, 88% of the population are Roman Catholics. Kielce is divided into seven districts, with the main towns and their populations in 1897 including Kielce (q.v.), Jedrzejow (Russian Andreyev, 5,010), Miechow (4,156), Olkusz (3,491), Pinczów (8,095), Stopnica (4,659), and Wloszczowa (23,065).

KIELCE, a town of Russian Poland, capital of the above government, 152 m. by rail S. of Warsaw, situated in a picturesque hilly country. Pop. (1890), 12,775; (1897), 23,189. It has a castle, built in 1638 and for some time inhabited by Charles XII.; it was renowned for its portrait gallery and the library of Zaluski, which was taken to St Petersburg. The squares and boulevards are lined with handsome modern buildings. The principal factories are hemp-spinning, cotton-printing and cement works. The town was founded in 1173 by a bishop of Cracow. In the 16th century it was famous for its copper mines, but they are no longer worked.
KIELCE, a town in Russian Poland, the capital of the above government, 152 miles by rail south of Warsaw, located in a beautiful hilly area. Population (1890), 12,775; (1897), 23,189. It has a castle built in 1638, which was once home to Charles XII.; it was known for its portrait gallery and the Zaluski library, which was taken to St. Petersburg. The squares and boulevards are lined with attractive modern buildings. The main industries include hemp-spinning, cotton-printing, and cement production. The town was founded in 1173 by a bishop of Cracow. In the 16th century, it was famous for its copper mines, but they are no longer in operation.

KIEPERT, HEINRICH (1818-1899), German geographer, was born at Berlin on the 31st of July 1818. He was educated at the university there, studying especially history, philology and geography. In 1840-1846, in collaboration with Karl Ritter, he issued his first work, Atlas von Hellas und den hellenischen Kolonien, which brought him at once into eminence in the sphere of ancient historical cartography. In 1848 his Historisch-geographischer Atlas der alten Welt appeared, and in 1854 the first edition of the Atlas antiquus, which has obtained very wide recognition, being issued in English, French, Russian, Dutch and Italian. In 1894 Kiepert produced the first part of a larger atlas of the ancient world under the title Formae orbis antiqui; his valuable maps in Corpus inscriptionum latinarum must also be mentioned. In 1877-1878 his Lehrbuch der alten Geographie was published, and in 1879 Leitfaden der alten Geographie, which was translated into English (A Manual of Ancient Geography, 1881) and into French. Among Kiepert’s general works one of the most important was the excellent Neuer Handatlas über alle Teile der Erde (1855 et seq.), and he also compiled a large number of special and educational maps. Asia Minor was an area in which he took particular interest. He visited it four times in 1841-1888; and his first map (1843-1846), together with his Karte des osmanischen Reiches in Asien (1844 and 1869), formed the highest authority for the geography of the region. Kiepert was professor of geography in the university of Berlin from 1854. He died at Berlin on the 21st of April 1899. He left unpublished considerable material in various departments of his work, and with the assistance of this his son Richard (b. 1846), who followed his father’s career, was enabled to issue a map of Asia Minor in 24 sheets, on a scale of 1 : 400,000 (1902 et seq.), and to carry on the issue of Formae orbis antiqui.
KIEPERT, HEINRICH (1818-1899), a German geographer, was born in Berlin on July 31, 1818. He studied at the university there, focusing on history, philology, and geography. From 1840 to 1846, he collaborated with Karl Ritter to publish his first work, Atlas von Hellas und den hellenischen Kolonien, which quickly established his reputation in the field of ancient historical cartography. In 1848, he published Historisch-geographischer Atlas der alten Welt, and in 1854, he released the first edition of Atlas antiquus, which gained widespread recognition and was published in English, French, Russian, Dutch, and Italian. In 1894, Kiepert produced the first part of a larger atlas of the ancient world titled Formae orbis antiqui; his valuable maps in Corpus inscriptionum latinarum are also noteworthy. From 1877 to 1878, he published Lehrbuch der alten Geographie, and in 1879, he released Leitfaden der alten Geographie, which was translated into English (A Manual of Ancient Geography, 1881) and French. Among Kiepert’s general works, one of the most significant was the excellent Neuer Handatlas über alle Teile der Erde (1855 et seq.), and he also created numerous special and educational maps. Asia Minor was a particular area of interest for him. He visited it four times between 1841 and 1888, and his first map (1843-1846), along with his Karte des osmanischen Reiches in Asien (1844 and 1869), became the leading authority on the geography of the region. Kiepert was a professor of geography at the University of Berlin starting in 1854. He died in Berlin on April 21, 1899. He left behind a significant amount of unpublished material across various fields, and with this, his son Richard (b. 1846), who followed in his father’s footsteps, was able to publish a map of Asia Minor in 24 sheets at a scale of 1:400,000 (1902 et seq.) and continue the publication of Formae orbis antiqui.

KIERKEGAARD, SÖREN AABY (1813-1855), Danish philosopher, the seventh child of a Jutland hosier, was born in Copenhagen on the 5th of May 1813. As a boy he was delicate, precocious and morbid in temperament. He studied theology at the university of Copenhagen, where he graduated in 1840 with a treatise On Irony. For two years he travelled in Germany, and in 1842 settled finally in Copenhagen, where he died on the 11th of November 1855. He had lived in studious retirement, subject to physical suffering and mental depression. His first volume, Papers of a Still Living Man (1838), a characterization of Hans Andersen, was a failure, and he was for some time unnoticed. In 1843 he published Euten—Eller (Either—or) (4th ed., 1878), the work on which his reputation mainly rests; it is a discussion of the ethical and aesthetic ideas of life. In his last years he carried on a feverish agitation against the theology and practice of the state church, on the ground that religion is for the individual soul, and is to be separated absolutely from the state and the world. In general his philosophy was a reaction against the speculative thinkers—Steffens (q.v.), Niels Treschow (1751-1833) and Frederik Christian Sibbern (1785-1872); it was based on the absolute dualism of Faith and Knowledge. His chief follower was Rasmus Nielsen (1809-1884) and he was opposed by Georg Brandes, who wrote a brilliant account of his life and works. As a dialectician he has been described as little inferior to Plato, and his influence on the literature of Denmark is considerable both in style and in matter. To him Ibsen owed his character Brand in the drama of that name.
Kierkegaard, Søren Aaby (1813-1855), Danish philosopher, the seventh child of a Jutland hosier, was born in Copenhagen on May 5, 1813. As a boy, he was delicate, precocious, and had a morbid temperament. He studied theology at the University of Copenhagen, graduating in 1840 with a thesis titled On Irony. He traveled in Germany for two years, and in 1842, he finally settled in Copenhagen, where he died on November 11, 1855. He lived a life of study in isolation, enduring physical pain and mental depression. His first book, Papers of a Still Living Man (1838), a portrayal of Hans Andersen, failed to gain attention, leaving him largely unnoticed for some time. In 1843, he published Euten—Eller (Either—or) (4th ed., 1878), the work that established his reputation; it's a discussion of ethical and aesthetic ideas about life. In his later years, he engaged in intense opposition against the theology and practices of the state church, arguing that religion should be a matter of the individual soul, completely separate from the state and the world. Overall, his philosophy reacted against speculative thinkers like Steffens (q.v.), Niels Treschow (1751-1833), and Frederik Christian Sibbern (1785-1872); it was founded on the absolute dualism of Faith and Knowledge. His main follower was Rasmus Nielsen (1809-1884), while he faced opposition from Georg Brandes, who wrote a compelling account of his life and works. As a dialectician, he has been described as nearly on par with Plato, and his influence on Danish literature is significant in both style and content. Ibsen was inspired by him for the character Brand in his play of the same name.
See his posthumous autobiographical sketch, Syns punktetfor min Forfattervirksomhed (“Standpoint of my Literary Work”); Georg Brandes, Sören Kierkegaard (Copenhagen, 1877); A. Bärthold, Noten zu K.’s Lebensgeschichte (Halle, 1876), Die Bedeutung der ästhetischen Schriften S. Kierkegaarde (Halle, 1879) and S. K.’s Persönlichkeit in ihrer Verwirklichung der Ideale (Gütersloh, 1886); F. Petersen, S. K.’s Christendomsforkyndelae (Christiania, 1877). For Kierkegaard’s relation to recent Danish thought, see Höffding’s Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie (1888), vol. ii.
See his posthumous autobiographical sketch, Syns punktetfor min Forfattervirksomhed (“Standpoint of my Literary Work”); Georg Brandes, Sören Kierkegaard (Copenhagen, 1877); A. Bärthold, Noten zu K.’s Lebensgeschichte (Halle, 1876), Die Bedeutung der ästhetischen Schriften S. Kierkegaarde (Halle, 1879) and S. K.’s Persönlichkeit in ihrer Verwirklichung der Ideale (Gütersloh, 1886); F. Petersen, S. K.’s Christendomsforkyndelae (Christiania, 1877). For Kierkegaard’s relation to recent Danish thought, see Höffding’s Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie (1888), vol. ii.

KIEV, Kieff, or Kiyeff, a government of south-western Russia, conterminous with those of Minsk, Poltava, Chernigov, Podolia, Kherson and Volhynia; area 19,686 sq. m. It represents a deeply trenched plateau, 600 to 800 ft. in altitude, reaching 950 to 1050 ft. in the west, assuming a steep character in the middle, and sloping gently northwards to the marshy regions of the Pripet, while on the east it falls abruptly to the valley of the Dnieper, which lies only 250 to 300 ft. above the sea. General A. Tillo has shown that neither geologically nor tectonically can “spurs of the Carpathians” penetrate into Kiev. Many useful minerals are extracted, such as granites, gabbro, labradorites of a rare beauty, syenites and gneiss, marble, grinding stones, pottery clay, phosphorites, iron ore and mineral colours. Towards the southern and central parts the surface is covered by deep rich “black earth.” Nearly the whole of the government belongs to the basin of the Dnieper, that river forming part of its eastern boundary. In the south-west are a few small tributaries of the Bug. Besides the Dnieper the only navigable stream is its confluent the Pripet. The climate is more moderate than in middle Russia, the average temperatures at the city of Kiev being—year, 44.5°; January, 21°; July, 68°; yearly rainfall, 22 inches. The lowlands of the north are covered with woods; they have the flora of the Polyesie, or marshy woodlands of Minsk, and are peopled with animals belonging to higher latitudes.1 The population, which was 2,017,262 in 1863, reached 3,575,457 in 1897, of whom 1,791,503 were women, and 147,878 lived in towns; and in 1904 it reached 4,042,526, of whom 2,030,744 were women. The estimated population in 1906 was 4,206,100. In 1897 there were 2,738,977 Orthodox Greeks, 14,888 Nonconformists, 91,821 Roman Catholics, 423,875 Jews, and 6820 Protestants.
Kiev, Kiev, or Kyiv, is a region in the southwestern part of Russia, bordering Minsk, Poltava, Chernigov, Podolia, Kherson, and Volhynia; it covers an area of 19,686 square miles. The area features a deeply eroded plateau that ranges from 600 to 800 feet in elevation, reaching heights of 950 to 1,050 feet in the west. The terrain is steep in the middle and slopes gently north toward the marshy regions of the Pripet, while to the east, it drops sharply to the Dnieper Valley, which is about 250 to 300 feet above sea level. General A. Tillo has demonstrated that the “spurs of the Carpathians” do not extend into Kiev either geologically or tectonically. Various useful minerals are mined here, including granites, gabbro, stunning labradorites, syenites, gneiss, marble, grinding stones, pottery clay, phosphorites, iron ore, and mineral dyes. The southern and central areas are covered with fertile “black earth.” Almost the entire region is part of the Dnieper basin, with the river forming a portion of its eastern border. In the southwest, there are a few small tributaries of the Bug. Apart from the Dnieper, the only navigable river is its tributary, the Pripet. The climate is milder than in central Russia, with average temperatures in Kiev of 44.5°F for the year, 21°F in January, and 68°F in July, with an annual rainfall of 22 inches. The northern lowlands are forested, featuring flora typical of the Polyesie, or marshy woodlands of Minsk, and are home to wildlife found in higher latitudes.1 The population, which was 2,017,262 in 1863, grew to 3,575,457 in 1897, including 1,791,503 women, with 147,878 living in urban areas; by 1904, it increased to 4,042,526, of whom 2,030,744 were women. The estimated population in 1906 was 4,206,100. In 1897, there were 2,738,977 Orthodox Christians, 14,888 Nonconformists, 91,821 Roman Catholics, 423,875 Jews, and 6,820 Protestants.
No less than 41 % of the land is in large holdings, and 45 % belongs to the peasants. Out of an area of 12,600,000 acres, 11,100,000 acres are available for cultivation, 4,758,000 acres are under crops, 650,000 acres under meadows, and 1,880,000 acres under woods. About 290,000 acres are under beetroot, for sugar. The crops principally grown are wheat, rye, oats, millet, barley and buckwheat, with, in smaller quantities, hemp, flax, vegetables, fruit and tobacco. Camels have been used for agricultural work. Bee-keeping and gardening are general. The chief factories are sugar works and distilleries. The former produce 850,000 to 1,150,000 tons of sugar and over 50,000 tons of molasses annually. The factories include machinery works and iron foundries, tanneries, steam flour-mills, petroleum refineries and tobacco factories. Two main railways, starting from Kiev and Cherkasy respectively, cross the government from N.E. to S.W., and two lines traverse its southern part from N.W. to S.E., parallel to the Dnieper. Steamers ply on the Dnieper and some of its tributaries. Wheat, rye, oats, barley and flour are exported. There are two great fairs, at Kiev and Berdichev respectively, and many of minor importance. Trade is very brisk, the river traffic alone being valued at over one million sterling annually. The government is divided into twelve districts. The chief town is Kiev (q.v.)and the district towns, with their populations in 1897, Berdichev (53,728), Cherkasy (29,619), Chigirin (9870), Kanev (8892), Lipovets (6068), Radomysl (11,154), Skvira (16,265), Tarashcha (11,452), Umañ (28,628), Vasilkov (17,824) and Zvenigorodka (16,972).
No less than 41% of the land is in large holdings, and 45% belongs to the peasants. Out of an area of 12,600,000 acres, 11,100,000 acres are available for cultivation, 4,758,000 acres are under crops, 650,000 acres are under meadows, and 1,880,000 acres are covered by woods. About 290,000 acres are used for beetroot, for sugar. The main crops grown are wheat, rye, oats, millet, barley, and buckwheat, with smaller quantities of hemp, flax, vegetables, fruit, and tobacco. Camels have been used for farm work. Beekeeping and gardening are common. The main factories are sugar plants and distilleries. The sugar plants produce between 850,000 and 1,150,000 tons of sugar and over 50,000 tons of molasses each year. The factories also include machinery works, iron foundries, tanneries, steam flour mills, petroleum refineries, and tobacco factories. Two main railways starting from Kiev and Cherkasy run across the region from northeast to southwest, and two lines traverse the southern part from northwest to southeast, parallel to the Dnieper River. Steamers operate on the Dnieper and some of its tributaries. Wheat, rye, oats, barley, and flour are exported. There are two major fairs, in Kiev and Berdichev, along with many smaller ones. Trade is very active, with river traffic alone valued at over one million pounds annually. The government is divided into twelve districts. The main town is Kiev (q.v.), and the district towns, with their populations in 1897, are Berdichev (53,728), Cherkasy (29,619), Chigirin (9,870), Kanev (8,892), Lipovets (6,068), Radomysl (11,154), Skvira (16,265), Tarashcha (11,452), Umañ (28,628), Vasilkov (17,824), and Zvenigorodka (16,972).
The plains on the Dnieper have been inhabited since probably the Palaeolithic period, and the burial-grounds used since the 789 Stone Age. The burial mounds (kurgans) of both the Scythians and the Slavs, traces of old forts (gorodishche), stone statues, and more recent caves offer abundant material for anthropological and ethnographical study.
The plains along the Dnieper River have been settled since likely the Paleolithic period, and the burial sites have been in use since the 789 Stone Age. The burial mounds (kurgans) of both the Scythians and the Slavs, remnants of old forts (gorodishche), stone statues, and more recent caves provide plenty of material for anthropological and ethnographic study.

KIEV, a city of Russia, capital of the above government, on the right or west bank of the Dnieper, in 50° 27′ 12″ N. and 30° 30′ 18″ E., 628 m. by rail S.W. of Moscow and 406 m. by rail N.N.E. of Odessa. The site of the greater part of the town consists of hills or bluffs separated by ravines and hollows, the elevation of the central portions being about 300 ft. above the ordinary level of the Dnieper. On the opposite side of the river the country spreads out low and level like a sea. Having received all its important tributaries, the Dnieper is here a broad (400 to 580 yds.) and navigable stream; but as it approaches the town it divides into two arms and forms a low grassy island of considerable extent called Tukhanov. During the spring floods there is a rise of 16 or even 20 ft., and not only the island but the country along the left bank and the lower grounds on the right bank are laid under water. The bed of the river is sandy and shifting, and it is only by costly engineering works that the main stream has been kept from returning to the more eastern channel, along which it formerly flowed. Opposite the southern part of the town, where the currents have again united, the river is crossed by a suspension bridge, which at the time of its erection (1848-1853) was the largest enterprise of the kind in Europe. It is about half a mile in length and 52½ ft. in breadth, and the four principal spans are each 440 ft. The bridge was designed by Vignoles, and cost about £400,000. Steamers ply in summer to Kremenchug, Ekaterinoslav, Mogilev, Pinsk and Chernigov. Altogether Kiev is one of the most beautiful cities in Russia, and the vicinity too is picturesque.
Kiev, is a city in Russia and the capital of the surrounding region, located on the right or west bank of the Dnieper River, at 50° 27′ 12″ N and 30° 30′ 18″ E. It is 628 miles by rail southwest of Moscow and 406 miles by rail north-northeast of Odessa. The majority of the city is situated on hills or bluffs separated by ravines and hollows, with the central parts rising about 300 feet above the normal level of the Dnieper. On the opposite side of the river, the land is flat and expansive like a sea. The Dnieper, having received all its significant tributaries, becomes a wide (400 to 580 yards) and navigable river here; however, as it nears the city, it splits into two branches, forming a large grassy island called Tukhanov. During the spring floods, the water can rise by 16 to even 20 feet, inundating both the island and the low-lying areas along the left bank and the lower grounds on the right bank. The riverbed is sandy and constantly shifting, and it’s only through expensive engineering efforts that the main stream has been prevented from shifting back to its old eastern channel. Near the southern part of the city, where the currents have rejoined, there’s a suspension bridge that, when it was built (1848-1853), was the largest of its kind in Europe. The bridge is about half a mile long and 52½ feet wide, with four main spans of each 440 feet. It was designed by Vignoles and cost around £400,000. During the summer, steamers travel to Kremenchug, Ekaterinoslav, Mogilev, Pinsk, and Chernigov. Overall, Kiev is one of the most beautiful cities in Russia, and its surroundings are also picturesque.
Until 1837 the town proper consisted of the Old Town, Pechersk and Podoli; but in that year three districts were added, and in 1879 the limits were extended to include Kurenevka, Lukyanovka, Shulyavka and Solomenka. The administrative area of the town is 13,500 acres.
Until 1837, the main part of the town included the Old Town, Pechersk, and Podoli. However, in that year, three districts were added, and in 1879, the boundaries were expanded to include Kurenevka, Lukyanovka, Shulyavka, and Solomenka. The town's administrative area covers 13,500 acres.
The Old Town, or Old Kiev quarter (Starokievskaya Chast), occupies the highest of the range of hills. Here the houses are most closely built, and stone structures most abundant. In some of the principal streets are buildings of three to five storeys, a comparatively rare thing in Russia, indeed in the main street (Kreshchatik) fine structures have been erected since 1896. In the 11th century the area was enclosed by earthen ramparts, with bastions and gateways; but of these the only surviving remnant is the Golden Gate. In the centre of the Old Town stands the cathedral of St Sophia, the oldest cathedral in the Russian empire. Its external walls are of a pale green and white colour, and it has ten cupolas, four spangled with stars and six surmounted each with a cross. The golden cupola of the four-storeyed campanile is visible for many miles across the steppes. The statement frequently made that the church was a copy of St Sophia’s in Constantinople has been shown to be a mistake. The building measures in length 177 ft., while its breadth is 118 ft. But though the plan shows no imitation of the great Byzantine church, the decorations of the interior (mosaics, frescoes, &c.) do indicate direct Byzantine influence. During the occupation of the church by the Uniats or United Greek Church in the 17th century these were covered with whitewash, and were only discovered in 1842, after which the cathedral was internally restored; but the chapel of the Three Pontiffs has been left untouched to show how carefully the old style has been preserved or copied. Among the mosaics is a colossal representation of the Virgin, 15 ft. in height, which, like the so-called “indestructible wall” in which it is inlaid, dates from the time (1019-1054) of Prince Yaroslav. This prince founded the church in 1037 in gratitude for his victory over the Petchenegs, a Turkish race then settled in the Dnieper valley. His sarcophagus, curiously sculptured with palms, fishes, &c., is preserved. The church of St Andrew the Apostle occupies the spot where, according to Russian tradition, that apostle stood when as yet Kiev was not, and declared that the hill would become the site of a great city. The present building, in florid rococo style, dates from 1744-1767. The church of the Tithes, rebuilt in 1828-1842, was founded in the close of the 10th century by Prince Vladimir in honour of two martyrs whom he had put to death; and the monastery of St Michael (or of the Golden Heads—so called from the fifteen gilded cupolas of the original church) claims to have been built in 1108 by Svyatopolk II., and was restored in 1655 by the Cossack chieftain Bogdan Chmielnicki. On a plateau above the river, the favourite promenade of the citizens, stands the Vladimir monument (1853) in bronze. In this quarter, some distance back from the river, is the new and richly decorated Vladimir cathedral (1862-1896), in the Byzantine style, distinguished for the beauty and richness of its paintings.
The Old Town, or Old Kiev quarter (Starokievskaya Chast), sits on the highest of the hills. Here, the houses are closely packed together, and stone buildings are everywhere. Some of the main streets have buildings that are three to five stories tall, which is relatively uncommon in Russia. On the main street (Kreshchatik), impressive structures have been built since 1896. In the 11th century, the area was surrounded by earthen walls with bastions and gates, but the only remaining piece is the Golden Gate. In the center of the Old Town stands the St. Sophia Cathedral, the oldest cathedral in the Russian Empire. Its exterior is a pale green and white, and it features ten domes, four decorated with stars and six topped with crosses. The golden dome of the four-story bell tower can be seen from many miles away across the steppes. It’s often claimed that the church is a replica of St. Sophia's in Constantinople, but this has been proven incorrect. The building is 177 ft. long and 118 ft. wide. While its layout doesn't imitate the great Byzantine church, the interior decorations (mosaics, frescoes, etc.) reflect a clear Byzantine influence. When the church was occupied by the Uniats or United Greek Church in the 17th century, these were covered with whitewash and were only uncovered in 1842, after which the cathedral was restored internally. However, the chapel of the Three Pontiffs has been left as is to show how carefully the old style has been preserved or copied. Among the mosaics is a massive representation of the Virgin, which stands 15 ft. tall and, like the so-called “indestructible wall” it’s set in, dates back to the time of Prince Yaroslav (1019-1054). This prince founded the church in 1037 to give thanks for his victory over the Petchenegs, a Turkish tribe that had settled in the Dnieper valley. His intricately carved sarcophagus, featuring palms, fish, and more, is still preserved. The Church of St. Andrew the Apostle is located where, according to Russian tradition, that apostle stood before Kiev existed and declared that the hill would be the site of a great city. The current building, in ornate rococo style, was built between 1744 and 1767. The Church of the Tithes, rebuilt from 1828 to 1842, was originally founded by Prince Vladimir at the end of the 10th century in honor of two martyrs he had executed. The Monastery of St. Michael (or of the Golden Heads, named for the fifteen gilded domes of the original church) is said to have been built in 1108 by Svyatopolk II and was restored in 1655 by the Cossack leader Bogdan Chmielnicki. On a plateau above the river, which is a popular promenade for the citizens, stands the Vladimir monument (1853) in bronze. In this quarter, a bit back from the river, is the new and richly decorated Vladimir Cathedral (1862-1896), in the Byzantine style, known for the beauty and richness of its paintings.
Until 1820 the south-eastern district of Pechersk was the industrial and commercial quarter; but it has been greatly altered in carrying out fortifications commenced in that year by Tsar Nicholas I. Most of the houses are small and old-fashioned. The monastery—the Kievo-Pecherskaya—is the chief establishment of its kind in Russia; it is visited every year by about 250,000 pilgrims. Of its ten or twelve conventual churches the chief is that of the Assumption. There are four distinct quarters in the monastery, each under a superior, subject to the archimandrite: the Laura proper or New Monastery, that of the Infirmary, and those of the Nearer and the Further Caves. These caves or catacombs are the most striking characteristic of the place; the name Pechersk, indeed, is connected with the Russian peshchera, “a cave.” The first series of caves, dedicated to St Anthony, contains eighty saints’ tombs; the second, dedicated to St Theodosius, a saint greatly venerated in Russia, about forty-five. The bodies were formerly exposed to view; but the pilgrims who now pass through the galleries see nothing but the draperies and the inscriptions. Among the more notable names are those of Nestor the chronicler, and Iliya of Murom, the Old Cossack of the Russian epics. The foundation of the monastery is ascribed to two saints of the 11th century—Anthony and Hilarion, the latter metropolitan of Kiev. By the middle of the 12th century it had become wealthy and beautiful. Completely ruined by the Mongol prince Batu in 1240, it remained deserted for more than two centuries. Prince Simeon Oblkovich was the first to begin the restoration. A conflagration laid the buildings waste in 1716, and their present aspect is largely due to Peter the Great. The cathedral of the Assumption, with seven gilded cupolas, was dedicated in 1089, destroyed by the Mongols in 1240, and restored in 1729; the wall-paintings of the interior are by V. Vereshchagin. The monastery contains a school of picture-makers of ancient origin, whose productions are widely diffused throughout the empire, and a printing press, from which have issued liturgical and religious works, the oldest known examples bearing the date 1616. It possesses a wonder-working ikon or image of the “Death of the Virgin,” said to have been brought from Constantinople in 1073, and the second highest bell-tower in Russia.
Until 1820, the southeastern area of Pechersk was the industrial and commercial district; however, it underwent significant changes starting in that year when Tsar Nicholas I initiated fortifications. Most of the houses are small and outdated. The main establishment in the area is the Kievo-Pecherskaya Monastery, which attracts around 250,000 pilgrims every year. Of its ten or twelve conventual churches, the most important is the Church of the Assumption. The monastery has four distinct sections, each overseen by a superior and under the authority of the archimandrite: the main part or New Monastery, the Infirmary, and the Nearer and Further Caves. These caves or catacombs are the most remarkable feature of the site; the name Pechersk is indeed linked to the Russian peshchera, meaning “cave.” The first set of caves, dedicated to St. Anthony, holds eighty saints’ tombs; the second, dedicated to St. Theodosius—a highly revered saint in Russia—contains about forty-five. Previously, the bodies were visible to pilgrims, but now those who walk through the galleries only see draperies and inscriptions. Notable names associated with the site include Nestor the chronicler and Iliya of Murom, the legendary Old Cossack from Russian epics. The monastery's founding is attributed to two 11th-century saints, Anthony and Hilarion, the latter being the metropolitan of Kiev. By the middle of the 12th century, it had become wealthy and beautiful. Completely destroyed by the Mongol prince Batu in 1240, it was abandoned for over two hundred years. Prince Simeon Oblkovich was the first to begin its restoration. A fire ravaged the buildings in 1716, and their current appearance is mostly due to Peter the Great. The Assumption Cathedral, topped with seven gilded domes, was dedicated in 1089, destroyed by the Mongols in 1240, and restored in 1729; the interior wall paintings were done by V. Vereshchagin. The monastery houses an ancient school for icon painters, whose works are widely distributed throughout the empire, and a printing press that has published liturgical and religious texts, the earliest known examples dating back to 1616. It also features a miraculous icon of the “Death of the Virgin,” believed to have been brought from Constantinople in 1073, along with the second tallest bell tower in Russia.
The Podol quarter lies on the low ground at the foot of the bluffs. It is the industrial and trading quarter of the city, and the seat of the great fair of the “Contracts,” the transference of which from Dubno in 1797 largely stimulated the commercial prosperity of Kiev. The present regular arrangement of its streets arose after the great fire of 1811. Lipki district (from the lipki or lime trees, destroyed in 1833) is of recent origin, and is mainly inhabited by the well-to-do classes. It is sometimes called the palace quarter, from the royal palace erected between 1868 and 1870, on the site of the older structure dating from the time of Tsaritsa Elizabeth. Gardens and parks abound; the palace garden is exceptionally fine, and in the same neighbourhood are the public gardens with the place of amusement known as the Château des Fleurs.
The Podol neighborhood is located in the low area at the base of the cliffs. It serves as the industrial and commercial hub of the city and hosts the major "Contracts" fair, which moved from Dubno in 1797 and significantly boosted Kiev's commercial success. The current grid layout of its streets was established after the massive fire in 1811. The Lipki district (named after the lipki or lime trees, which were lost in 1833) is a newer area primarily occupied by affluent residents. It's sometimes referred to as the palace quarter because of the royal palace built between 1868 and 1870 on the site of an older building from the time of Tsaritsa Elizabeth. There are plenty of gardens and parks; the palace garden is particularly beautiful, and nearby are public gardens complete with an entertainment area known as the Château des Fleurs.
In the New Buildings, or the Lybed quarter, are the university and the botanical gardens. The Ploskaya Chast (Flat quarter) or Obolon contains the lunatic asylum; the Lukyanovka Chast, the penitentiary and the camp and barracks; and the Bulvarnaya Chast, the military gymnasium of St Vladimir and the 790 railway station. The educational and scientific institutions of Kiev rank next to those of the two capitals. Its university, removed from Vilna to Kiev in 1834, has about 2500 students, and is well provided with observatories, laboratories, libraries and museums; five scientific societies and two societies for aid to poor students are attached to it. There are, besides, a theological academy, founded in 1615; a society of church archaeology, which possesses a museum built in 1900, very rich in old ikons, crosses, &c., both Russian and Oriental; an imperial academy of music; university courses for ladies; a polytechnic, with 1300 students—the building was completed in 1900 and stands on the other side of Old Kiev, away from the river. Of the learned societies the more important are the medical (1840), the naturalists’ (1869), the juridical (1876), the historical of Nestor the Chronicler (1872), the horticultural (1875), and the dramatic (1879), the archaeological commission (1843), and the society of church archaeology.
In the New Buildings, or Lybed quarter, you'll find the university and the botanical gardens. The Ploskaya Chast (Flat quarter) or Obolon has the mental asylum; Lukyanovka Chast includes the penitentiary, camp, and barracks; and the Bulvarnaya Chast houses the military gymnasium of St. Vladimir and the 790 railway station. The educational and scientific institutions in Kiev are among the best after those in the two capitals. The university, moved from Vilna to Kiev in 1834, has about 2,500 students and is well-equipped with observatories, laboratories, libraries, and museums. It also has five scientific societies and two organizations to support poor students. Additionally, there’s a theological academy established in 1615, a society of church archaeology with a museum founded in 1900 that is rich in ancient icons, crosses, etc., both Russian and Oriental; an imperial academy of music; university courses for women; and a polytechnic with 1,300 students—the building was completed in 1900 and is located across from Old Kiev, away from the river. Among the learned societies, the most notable are the medical (established in 1840), the naturalists’ (1869), the juridical (1876), the historical society of Nestor the Chronicler (1872), the horticultural (1875), the dramatic (1879), the archaeological commission (1843), and the society of church archaeology.
Kiev is the principal centre for the sugar industry of Russia, as well as for the general trade of the region. Its Stryetenskaya fair is important. More than twenty caves were discovered on the slope of a hill (Kirilov Street), and one of them, excavated in 1876, proved to have belonged to neolithic troglodytes. Numerous graves, both from the pagan and the Christian periods, the latter containing more than 2000 skeletons, with a great number of small articles, were discovered in the same year in the same neighbourhood. Many colonial Roman coins of the 3rd and 4th centuries, and silver dirhems, stamped at Samarkand, Balkh, Merv, &c., were also found in 1869.
Kiev is the main hub for the sugar industry in Russia and serves as a key trade center for the region. Its Stryetenskaya fair is significant. More than twenty caves were found on the slope of a hill (Kirilov Street), and one of them, excavated in 1876, turned out to have belonged to Neolithic cave dwellers. In the same year and area, numerous graves from both pagan and Christian times were discovered, the latter containing over 2000 skeletons along with many small items. A large number of colonial Roman coins from the 3rd and 4th centuries, as well as silver dirhems minted in Samarkand, Balkh, Merv, etc., were also uncovered in 1869.
In 1862 the population of Kiev was returned as 70,341; in 1874 the total was given as 127,251; and in 1902 as 319,000. This includes 20,000 Poles and 12,000 Jews. Kiev is the headquarters of the IX. Army Corps, and of a metropolitan of the Orthodox Greek Church.
In 1862, the population of Kiev was recorded as 70,341; in 1874, the total was reported as 127,251; and in 1902, it was 319,000. This includes 20,000 Poles and 12,000 Jews. Kiev is the headquarters of the IX Army Corps and the metropolitan of the Orthodox Greek Church.
The history of Kiev cannot be satisfactorily separated from that of Russia. According to Nestor’s legend it was founded in 864 by three brothers, Kiy, Shchek and Khoriv, and after their deaths the principality was seized by two Varangians (Scandinavians), Askold and Dir, followers of Rurik, also in 864. Rurik’s successor Oleg conquered Kiev in 882 and made it the chief town of his principality. It was in the waters of the Dnieper opposite the town that Prince Vladimir, the first saint of the Russian church, caused his people to be baptized (988), and Kiev became the seat of the first Christian church, of the first Christian school, and of the first library in Russia. For three hundred and seventy-six years it was an independent Russian city; for eighty years (1240-1320) it was subject to the Mongols; for two hundred and forty-nine years (1320-1569) it belonged to the Lithuanian principality; and for eighty-five years to Poland (1569-1654). It was finally united to the Russian empire in 1686. The city was devastated by the khan of the Crimea in 1483. The Magdeburg rights, which the city enjoyed from 1516, were abolished in 1835, and the ordinary form of town government introduced; and in 1840 it was made subject to the common civil law of the empire.
The history of Kiev is closely tied to that of Russia. According to Nestor’s legend, it was founded in 864 by three brothers, Kiy, Shchek, and Khoriv. After their deaths, the principality was taken over by two Varangians (Scandinavians), Askold and Dir, who were followers of Rurik, also in 864. Rurik’s successor Oleg conquered Kiev in 882 and made it the main town of his principality. It was in the Dnieper River, across from the town, that Prince Vladimir, the first saint of the Russian church, had his people baptized (988), and Kiev became the center for the first Christian church, the first Christian school, and the first library in Russia. For three hundred and seventy-six years, it was an independent Russian city; for eighty years (1240-1320), it was under Mongol control; for two hundred and forty-nine years (1320-1569), it was part of the Lithuanian principality; and for eighty-five years, it was ruled by Poland (1569-1654). It finally became part of the Russian empire in 1686. The city was devastated by the Crimean khan in 1483. The Magdeburg rights that the city enjoyed from 1516 were abolished in 1835, and ordinary town government was established; in 1840, it was brought under the common civil law of the empire.
The Russian literature concerning Kiev is voluminous. Its bibliography will be found in the Russian Geographical Dictionary of P. Semenov, and in the Russian Encyclopaedic Dictionary, published by Brockhaus and Efron (vol. xv., 1895). Among recent publications are: Rambaud’s La Russie épique (Pans, 1876); Avenarius, Kniga o Kievskikh Bogatuiryakh (St Petersburg, 1876), dealing with the early Kiev heroes; Zakrevski, Opisanie Kieva (1868); the materials issued by the commission for the investigation of the ancient records of the city; Taranovskiy, Gorod Kiev (Kiev, 1881); De Baye, Kiev, la mère des villes russes (Paris, 1896); Goetz, Das Kiewer Höhlenkloster als Kulturzentrum des Vormongolischen Russlands (Passau, 1904). See also Count Bobrinsky, Kurgans of Smiela (1897); and N. Byelyashevsky, The Mints of Kiev.
The Russian literature about Kiev is extensive. You can find its bibliography in the Russian Geographical Dictionary by P. Semenov, and in the Russian Encyclopaedic Dictionary, published by Brockhaus and Efron (vol. xv., 1895). Some recent publications include: Rambaud’s La Russie épique (Paris, 1876); Avenarius, Kniga o Kievskikh Bogatuiryakh (St. Petersburg, 1876), which focuses on the early heroes of Kiev; Zakrevski, Opisanie Kieva (1868); materials released by the commission investigating the ancient records of the city; Taranovskiy, Gorod Kiev (Kiev, 1881); De Baye, Kiev, la mère des villes russes (Paris, 1896); Goetz, Das Kiewer Höhlenkloster als Kulturzentrum des Vormongolischen Russlands (Passau, 1904). Also see Count Bobrinsky, Kurgans of Smiela (1897); and N. Byelyashevsky, The Mints of Kiev.

KILBARCHAN, a burgh of barony of Renfrewshire, Scotland, 1 m. from Milliken Park station on the Glasgow & South-Western railway, 13 m. W. by S. of Glasgow. Pop. (1901), 2886. The public buildings include a hall, library and masonic lodge (dating from 1784). There is also a park. In a niche in the town steeple (erected in 1755) is the statue of the famous piper, who died about the beginning of the 17th century and is commemorated in the elegy on “The Life and Death of Habbie Simson, Piper of Kilbarchan” by Robert Sempill of Beltrees (1595-1665). The chief industries are manufactures of linen (introduced in 1739 and dating the rise of the prosperity of the town), cotton, silks and “Paisley” shawls, and calico-printing, besides quarries, coal and iron mines in the neighbourhood. Two miles south-west is a great rock of greenstone called Clochoderick, 12 ft. in height, 22 ft. in length, and 17 ft. in breadth. About 2 m. north-west on Gryfe Water, lies Bridge of Weir (pop. 2242), the industries of which comprise tanning, currying, calico-printing, thread-making and wood-turning. It has a station on the Glasgow & South-Western railway. Immediately to the south-west of Bridge of Weir are the ruins of Ranfurly Castle, the ancient seat of the Knoxes. Sir John de Knocks (fl. 1422) is supposed to have been the great-grandfather of John Knox; and Andrew Knox (1550-1633), one of the most distinguished members of the family, was successively bishop of the Isles, abbot of Icolmkill (Iona), and bishop of Raphoe. About 4 m. N.W. of Bridge of Weir lies the holiday resort of Kilmalcolm (pronounced Kilmacome; pop. 2220), with a station on the Glasgow & South-Western railway. It has a golf-course, public park and hydropathic establishment. Several charitable institutions have been built in and near the town, amongst them the well-known Quarrier’s Orphan Homes of Scotland.
KILBARCHAN, a small town in Renfrewshire, Scotland, is located 1 mile from Milliken Park station on the Glasgow & South-Western railway, 13 miles west-southwest of Glasgow. Population (1901): 2,886. The public buildings include a hall, a library, and a Masonic lodge dating back to 1784. There's also a park. In a niche in the town steeple, built in 1755, is the statue of the famous piper who died around the early 17th century, commemorated in the elegy "The Life and Death of Habbie Simson, Piper of Kilbarchan" by Robert Sempill of Beltrees (1595-1665). The main industries include linen manufacturing (introduced in 1739, marking the town's rise in prosperity), along with cotton, silk, “Paisley” shawls, and calico printing, as well as nearby quarries, coal, and iron mines. Two miles southwest is a large greenstone rock called Clochoderick, which stands 12 feet high, 22 feet long, and 17 feet wide. About 2 miles northwest on the Gryfe Water is Bridge of Weir (population 2,242), which has industries including tanning, currying, calico printing, thread making, and wood turning. There is a station on the Glasgow & South-Western railway. Just southwest of Bridge of Weir are the ruins of Ranfurly Castle, the historic home of the Knox family. Sir John de Knocks (fl. 1422) is believed to be the great-grandfather of John Knox; Andrew Knox (1550-1633), a prominent family member, was the bishop of the Isles, abbot of Icolmkill (Iona), and bishop of Raphoe. About 4 miles northwest of Bridge of Weir is Kilmalcolm (pronounced Kilmacome; population 2,220), a vacation spot with a station on the Glasgow & South-Western railway. It features a golf course, public park, and a hydropathic establishment. Several charitable institutions have been established in and around the town, including the well-known Quarrier’s Orphan Homes of Scotland.

KILBIRNIE, a town in north Ayrshire, Scotland, on the Garnock, 20½ m. S.W. of Glasgow, with stations on the Glasgow & South-Western and the Caledonian railways. Pop. (1901), 4571. The industries include flax-spinning, rope works, engineering works, and manufactures of linen thread, wincey, flannels and fishing-nets, and there are iron and steel works and coal mines in the vicinity. The parish church is of historical interest, most of the building dating from the Reformation. In the churchyard are the recumbent effigies of Captain Thomas Crawford of Jordanhill (d. 1603), who in 1575 effected the surprise of Dumbarton Castle, and his lady. Near Kilbirnie Place, a modern mansion, are the ruins of Kilbirnie Castle, an ancient seat of the earls of Crawford, destroyed by fire in 1757. About 1 m. E. is Kilbirnie Loch, 11⁄3 m. long.
KILBIRNIE, is a town in North Ayrshire, Scotland, located on the Garnock River, 20½ miles southwest of Glasgow, with stations on the Glasgow & South-Western and Caledonian railways. The population was 4,571 in 1901. The local industries include flax-spinning, rope manufacturing, engineering, and the production of linen thread, wincey, flannels, and fishing nets. There are also iron and steel works and coal mines nearby. The parish church is historically significant, with most of its structure dating back to the Reformation. In the churchyard, you'll find the recumbent effigies of Captain Thomas Crawford of Jordanhill (who died in 1603) and his wife, who famously surprised Dumbarton Castle in 1575. Close to Kilbirnie Place, a modern mansion, lie the ruins of Kilbirnie Castle, an ancient residence of the earls of Crawford, which was destroyed by fire in 1757. About 1 mile to the east is Kilbirnie Loch, which is 1⅓ miles long.

KILBRIDE, WEST, a town on the coast of Ayrshire, Scotland, near the mouth of Kilbride Burn, 4 m. N.N.W. of Ardrossan and 35¾ m. S.W. of Glasgow by the Glasgow & South-Western railway. Pop. (1901), 2315. It has been growing in repute as a health resort; the only considerable industry is weaving. In the neighbourhood are the ruins of Law Castle, Crosbie Castle and Portincross Castle, the last, dating from the 13th century, said to be a seat of the Stuart kings. Farland Head, with cliffs 300 ft. high, lies 2 m. W. by N.; and the inland country is hilly, one point, Kaim Hill, being 1270 ft. above sea-level.
KILBRIDE, WEST, is a town on the coast of Ayrshire, Scotland, near the mouth of Kilbride Burn, 4 miles N.N.W. of Ardrossan and 35¾ miles S.W. of Glasgow by the Glasgow & South-Western railway. Population (1901), 2,315. It has been gaining popularity as a health resort; the main industry is weaving. Nearby are the ruins of Law Castle, Crosbie Castle, and Portincross Castle, the latter dating back to the 13th century and said to have been a residence of the Stuart kings. Farland Head, with cliffs reaching 300 feet high, is located 2 miles W. by N.; and the inland area is hilly, with Kaim Hill rising to 1,270 feet above sea level.

KILDARE, a county of Ireland in the province of Leinster, bounded W. by Queen’s County and King’s County, N. by Meath, E. by Dublin and Wicklow, and S. by Carlow. The area is 418,496 acres or about 654 sq. m. The greater part of Kildare belongs to the great central plain of Ireland. In the east of the county this plain is bounded by the foot-hills of the mountains of Dublin and Wicklow; in the centre it is interrupted by an elevated plateau terminated on the south by the hills of Dunmurry, and on the north by the Hill of Allen (300 ft.) which rises abruptly from the Bog of Allen. The principal rivers are the Boyne, which with its tributary the Blackwater rises in the north part of the county, but soon passes into Meath; the Barrow, which forms the boundary of Kildare with Queen’s County, and receives the Greese and the Lane shortly after entering Kildare; the Lesser Barrow, which flows southward from the Bog of Allen to near Rathangan; and the Liffey, which enters the county near Ballymore Eustace, and flowing north-west and then north-east quits it at Leixlip, having received the Morrel between Celbridge and Clane, and the Ryewater at Leixlip. Trout are taken in the upper waters, and there are salmon reaches near Leixlip.
Kildare is a county in Ireland, located in the province of Leinster. It is bordered on the west by Queen’s County and King’s County, on the north by Meath, on the east by Dublin and Wicklow, and on the south by Carlow. The area covers 418,496 acres, which is about 654 square miles. Most of Kildare is part of the great central plain of Ireland. In the east of the county, this plain is bordered by the foothills of the Dublin and Wicklow mountains. In the center, it's interrupted by an elevated plateau, which is bounded to the south by the Dunmurry hills and to the north by the Hill of Allen (300 ft.), which rises steeply from the Bog of Allen. The main rivers include the Boyne, which rises in the northern part of the county with its tributary the Blackwater but soon flows into Meath; the Barrow, which forms the boundary between Kildare and Queen’s County and collects the Greese and the Lane shortly after entering Kildare; the Lesser Barrow, which flows southward from the Bog of Allen to near Rathangan; and the Liffey, which enters the county near Ballymore Eustace and flows northwest then northeast, leaving it at Leixlip after receiving the Morrel between Celbridge and Clane, and the Ryewater at Leixlip. Trout are found in the upper waters, and there are salmon runs near Leixlip.
Geology.—The greater part of the county is formed of typical grey Carboniferous limestone, well seen in the flat land about Clane. The natural steps at the Salmon Falls at Leixlip are formed from similar strata. Along the south-east the broken ground of Silurian shales forms the higher country, rising towards the Leinster chain. The granite core of the latter, with its margin of mica-schist produced by the metamorphism of the Silurian beds, appears in the south round Castledermot. A parallel ridge of Silurian rocks, 791 including an interesting series of basic lavas, rises from the plain north of Kildare town (Hill of Allen and Chair of Kildare), with some Old Red Sandstone on its flanks. The limestone in this ridge is rich in fossils of Bala age, and has been compared with that at Portrane in county Dublin. The low ground is diversified by eskers and masses of glacial gravel, notably at the dry sandy plateau of the Curragh; but in part it retains sufficient moisture to give rise to extensive bogs. The Liffey, which comes down as a mountain-stream in the Silurian area, forming a picturesque fall in the gorge of Pollaphuca, wanders through the limestone region between low banks as a true river of the plain.
Geology.—Most of the county is made up of typical gray Carboniferous limestone, prominently visible in the flat land around Clane. The natural steps at the Salmon Falls in Leixlip are formed from similar layers. In the southeast, the rugged terrain of Silurian shales creates the higher ground that rises toward the Leinster chain. The granite core of this chain, along with its edge of mica-schist formed by the transformation of Silurian rocks, can be found in the south near Castledermot. A parallel ridge of Silurian rocks, 791 containing an interesting sequence of basic lavas, rises from the plains north of Kildare town (Hill of Allen and Chair of Kildare), with some Old Red Sandstone on its slopes. The limestone in this ridge is rich in fossils from the Bala period and has been compared to that in Portrane, county Dublin. The lowlands feature a variety of eskers and piles of glacial gravel, especially at the dry sandy plateau of the Curragh; however, some areas still retain enough moisture to support extensive bogs. The Liffey, which flows down as a mountain stream in the Silurian region, creates a stunning waterfall in the gorge of Pollaphuca and meanders through the limestone area between low banks as a true river of the plain.
Climate and Industries.—Owing to a considerable degree to the large extent of bog, the climate of the northern districts is very moist, and fogs are frequent, but the eastern portion is drier, and the climate of the Liffey valley is very mild and healthy. The soil, whether resting on the limestone or on the clay slate, is principally a rich deep loam inclining occasionally to clay, easily cultivated and very fertile if properly drained. About 40,000 acres in the northern part of the county are included in the Bog of Allen, which is, however, intersected in many places by elevated tracts of firm ground. To the east of the town of Kildare is the Curragh, an undulating down upwards of 4800 acres in extent. The most fertile and highly cultivated districts of Kildare are the valleys of the Liffey and a tract in the south watered by the Greese. The demesne lands along the valley of the Liffey are finely wooded. More attention is paid to drainage and the use of manures on the larger farms than is done in many other parts of Ireland. The pastures which are not subjected to the plough are generally very rich and fattening. The proportion of tillage to pasture is roughly as 1 to 2½. Wheat is a scanty crop, but oats, barley, turnips and potatoes are all considerably cultivated. Cattle and sheep are grazed extensively, and the numbers are well sustained. Of the former, crosses with the shorthorn or the Durham are the commonest breed. Leicesters are the principal breed of sheep. Poultry farming is a growing industry.
Climate and Industries.—Due in large part to the extensive bogs, the climate in the northern districts is very wet, with frequent fogs, but the eastern area is drier, and the climate of the Liffey valley is mild and healthy. The soil, whether on limestone or clay slate, is mainly a rich deep loam, sometimes tending toward clay, making it easy to cultivate and very fertile if properly drained. About 40,000 acres in the northern part of the county are part of the Bog of Allen, which, however, is split in many places by raised areas of solid ground. To the east of Kildare town is the Curragh, a rolling area covering over 4,800 acres. The most fertile and highly farmed regions of Kildare lie in the valleys of the Liffey and a southern area watered by the Greese. The estate lands along the Liffey valley are well-forested. Greater attention is given to drainage and the use of fertilizers on larger farms than in many other parts of Ireland. The pastures that aren't tilled are usually very rich and good for fattening livestock. The ratio of tillage to pasture is roughly 1 to 2½. Wheat is grown in small amounts, but oats, barley, turnips, and potatoes are all widely cultivated. Cattle and sheep are raised extensively, and their numbers are well-maintained. Among cattle, crosses with the shorthorn or Durham are the most common breeds. Leicesters are the main breed of sheep. Poultry farming is an expanding industry.
Though possessing a good supply of water-power the county is almost destitute of manufactures; there are a few small cotton, woollen and paper mills, as well as breweries and distilleries, and several corn mills. Large quantities of turf are exported to Dublin by canal. The main line of the Midland Great Western follows the northern boundary of the county, with a branch to Carbury and Edenderry; and that of the Great Southern & Western crosses the county by way of Newbridge and Kildare, with southward branches to Naas (and Tullow, county Carlow) and to Athy and the south. The northern border is traversed by the Royal Canal, which connects Dublin with the Shannon at Cloondara. Farther south the Grand Canal, which connects Dublin with the Shannon at Shannon Harbour, occupies the valley of the Liffey until at Sallins it enters the Bog of Allen, passing into King’s County near the source of the Boyne. Several branch canals afford communication with the southern districts.
Even though the county has plenty of water power, it has very few manufacturing businesses. There are a handful of small cotton, wool, and paper mills, along with some breweries and distilleries, and several corn mills. A lot of turf is shipped to Dublin via canal. The main line of the Midland Great Western runs along the northern boundary of the county, with a branch that goes to Carbury and Edenderry; the Great Southern & Western line crosses the county through Newbridge and Kildare, with southern branches to Naas (and Tullow, County Carlow) and to Athy and the south. The northern border is crossed by the Royal Canal, which links Dublin to the Shannon at Cloondara. Further south, the Grand Canal connects Dublin to the Shannon at Shannon Harbour and follows the valley of the Liffey until it reaches Sallins, where it flows into the Bog of Allen, heading into King's County near the source of the Boyne. Several branch canals provide connections to the southern areas.
Population and Administration.—The decreasing population (70,206 in 1891; 63,566 in 1901) shows an unusual excess of males over females, in spite of an excess of male emigrants. About 86% of the population are Roman Catholics. The county comprises 14 baronies and contains 110 civil parishes. Assizes are held at Naas, and quarter sessions at Athy, Kildare, Maynooth and Naas. The military stations at Newbridge and the Curragh constitute the Curragh military district, and the barracks at Athy and Naas are included in the Dublin military district. The principal towns are Athy (pop. 3599), Naas (3836) and Newbridge (2903); with Maynooth (which is the seat of a Roman Catholic college), Celbridge, Kildare (the county town), Monasterevan, Kilcullen and Leixlip. Ballitore, one of the larger villages, is a Quaker settlement, and at a school here Edmund Burke was educated. Kildare returned ten members to the Irish parliament, of whom eight represented boroughs; it sends only two (for the north and south divisions of the county) to the parliament of the United Kingdom. The county is in the Protestant diocese of Dublin and the Roman Catholic dioceses of Dublin and of Kildare and Leighlin.
Population and Administration.—The declining population (70,206 in 1891; 63,566 in 1901) shows a noticeable surplus of males over females, even with a higher number of male emigrants. About 86% of the population identifies as Roman Catholic. The county is made up of 14 baronies and includes 110 civil parishes. Assizes take place in Naas, while quarter sessions are held in Athy, Kildare, Maynooth, and Naas. The military bases at Newbridge and the Curragh form the Curragh military district, and the barracks in Athy and Naas are part of the Dublin military district. The main towns are Athy (pop. 3599), Naas (3836), and Newbridge (2903), along with Maynooth (home to a Roman Catholic college), Celbridge, Kildare (the county town), Monasterevan, Kilcullen, and Leixlip. Ballitore, one of the larger villages, is a Quaker settlement, where Edmund Burke was educated. Kildare had ten representatives in the Irish parliament, with eight coming from boroughs; it now sends only two (representing the north and south divisions of the county) to the parliament of the United Kingdom. The county falls under the Protestant diocese of Dublin and the Roman Catholic dioceses of Dublin and of Kildare and Leighlin.
History and Antiquities.—According to a tale in the Book of Leinster the original name of Kildare was Druim Criaidh (Drumcree), which it retained until the time of St Brigit, after which it was changed to Cilldara, the church of the oak, from an old oak under whose shadow the saint had constructed her cell. For some centuries it was under the government of the Macmurroughs, kings of Leinster, but with the remainder of Leinster it was granted by Henry II. to Strongbow. On the division of the palatinate of Leinster among the five grand-daughters of Strongbow, Kildare fell to Sibilla, the fourth daughter, who married William de Ferrars, earl of Derby. Through the marriage of the only daughter of William de Ferrars it passed to William de Vescy—who, when challenged to single combat by John Fitz Thomas, baron of Offaly, for accusing him of treason, fled to France. His lands were thereupon in 1297 bestowed on Fitz Thomas, who in 1316 was created earl of Kildare, and in 1317 was appointed sheriff of Kildare, the office remaining in the family until the attainder of Gerald, the ninth earl, in the reign of Henry VIII. Kildare was a liberty of Dublin until 1296, when an act was passed constituting it a separate county.
History and Antiquities.—According to a story in the Book of Leinster, the original name of Kildare was Druim Criaidh (Drumcree), which it kept until the time of St. Brigit, after which it was changed to Cilldara, meaning the church of the oak, named after an old oak tree under which the saint built her cell. For several centuries, it was governed by the Macmurroughs, kings of Leinster, but along with the rest of Leinster, it was granted by Henry II to Strongbow. When the palatinate of Leinster was divided among the five granddaughters of Strongbow, Kildare went to Sibilla, the fourth daughter, who married William de Ferrars, the Earl of Derby. Through the marriage of William de Ferrars' only daughter, it passed to William de Vescy—who, when challenged to single combat by John Fitz Thomas, Baron of Offaly, for accusing him of treason, fled to France. His lands were then granted to Fitz Thomas in 1297, who was made Earl of Kildare in 1316 and appointed sheriff of Kildare in 1317, with the office staying in the family until the attainder of Gerald, the ninth earl, during the reign of Henry VIII. Kildare was part of Dublin until 1296, when an act was passed making it a separate county.
In the county are several old gigantic pillar-stones, the principal being those at Punchestown, Harristown, Jigginstown and Mullamast. Among remarkable earthworks are the raths at Mullamast, Knockcaellagh near Kilcullen, Ardscull near Naas, and the numerous sepulchral mounds in the Curragh. Of the round towers the finest is that of Kildare; there are remains of others at Taghadoe, Old Kilcullen, Oughterard and Castledermot. Formerly there were an immense number of religious houses in the county. There are remains of a Franciscan abbey at Castledermot. At Graney are ruins of an Augustinian nunnery and portions of a building said to have belonged to the Knights Templars. The town of Kildare has ruins of four monastic buildings, including the nunnery founded by St Brigit. The site of a monastery at Old Kilcullen, said to date from the time of St Patrick, is marked by two stone crosses, one of which is curiously sculptured. The fine abbey of Monasterevan is now the seat of the marquess of Drogheda. On the Liffey are the remains of Great Connel Abbey near Celbridge, of St Wolstan’s near Celbridge, and of New Abbey. At Moone, where there was a Franciscan monastery, are the remains of an ancient cross with curious sculpturings. Among castles may be mentioned those of Athy and Castledermot, built about the time of the Anglo-Norman invasion; Maynooth Castle, built by the Fitzgeralds; Kilkea, originally built by the seventh earl of Kildare, and restored within the 19th century; and Timolin, erected in the reign of King John.
In the county, there are several old giant pillar stones, the main ones being at Punchestown, Harristown, Jigginstown, and Mullamast. Notable earthworks include the raths at Mullamast, Knockcaellagh near Kilcullen, Ardscull near Naas, and the many burial mounds in the Curragh. Of the round towers, the best-preserved is in Kildare; there are remains of others at Taghadoe, Old Kilcullen, Oughterard, and Castledermot. In the past, there were a huge number of religious houses in the county. There are remnants of a Franciscan abbey at Castledermot. At Graney, there are ruins of an Augustinian nunnery and parts of a building believed to have belonged to the Knights Templars. The town of Kildare has ruins of four monastic buildings, including the nunnery founded by St. Brigit. The site of a monastery at Old Kilcullen, said to date back to the time of St. Patrick, is marked by two stone crosses, one of which is intricately carved. The beautiful abbey of Monasterevan is now the residence of the Marquess of Drogheda. Along the Liffey are the remains of Great Connel Abbey near Celbridge, St. Wolstan's near Celbridge, and New Abbey. At Moone, where there used to be a Franciscan monastery, are the remains of an ancient cross with interesting carvings. Among the castles are those of Athy and Castledermot, built around the time of the Anglo-Norman invasion; Maynooth Castle, built by the Fitzgeralds; Kilkea, originally constructed by the seventh Earl of Kildare and restored in the 19th century; and Timolin, erected during King John's reign.

KILDARE, a market town and the county town of county Kildare, Ireland, in the south parliamentary division, a junction on the main line of the Great Southern & Western railway, 30. m. S.W. from Dublin, the branch line to Athy, Carlow and Kilkenny diverging southward. Pop. (1901), 1576. The town is of high antiquarian interest. There is a Protestant cathedral church, the diocese of which was united with Dublin in 1846. St Brigit or Bridget founded the religious community in the 5th century, and a fire sacred to the memory of the saint is said to have been kept incessantly burning for several centuries (until the Reformation) in a small ancient chapel called the Fire House, part of which remains. The cathedral suffered with the town from frequent burnings and destructions at the hands of the Danes and the Irish, and during the Elizabethan wars. The existing church was partially in ruins when an extensive restoration was begun in 1875 under the direction of G.E. Street; while the choir, which dated from the latter part of the 17th century, was rebuilt in 1896. Close to the church are an ancient cross and a very fine round tower (its summit unhappily restored with a modern battlement) 105½ ft. high, with a doorway with unusual ornament of Romanesque character. There are remains of a castle of the 13th century, and of a Carmelite monastery. From the elevated situation of the town, a striking view of the great central plain of Ireland is afforded. Kildare was incorporated by James II., and returned two members to the Irish parliament.
Kildare is a market town and the county town of County Kildare, Ireland, located in the southern parliamentary division. It serves as a junction on the main line of the Great Southern & Western railway, 30 miles southwest of Dublin, with a branch line to Athy, Carlow, and Kilkenny branching off to the south. The population in 1901 was 1,576. The town has significant historical interest. There's a Protestant cathedral church, whose diocese was merged with Dublin in 1846. St. Brigit or Bridget established the religious community in the 5th century, and a fire dedicated to the saint is said to have burned continuously for several centuries (up until the Reformation) in a small ancient chapel known as the Fire House, part of which still exists. The cathedral experienced damage along with the town from frequent fires and destruction by the Danes and the Irish, as well as during the Elizabethan wars. The current church was partially in ruins when an extensive restoration began in 1875 under the guidance of G.E. Street, and the choir, which dates from the late 17th century, was rebuilt in 1896. Adjacent to the church are an ancient cross and a very impressive round tower (unfortunately, its top was restored with a modern battlement) standing 105½ feet high, featuring a doorway with unique Romanesque ornamentation. Remnants of a 13th-century castle and a Carmelite monastery can also be found. From the town's high elevation, there is a stunning view of Ireland's vast central plain. Kildare was incorporated by James II and sent two members to the Irish parliament.

KILHAM, ALEXANDER (1762-1798), English Methodist, was born at Epworth, Lincolnshire, on the 10th of July 1762. He was admitted by John Wesley in 1785 into the regular itinerant ministry. He became the leader and spokesman of the democratic party in the Connexion which claimed for the laity the free election of class-leaders and stewards, and equal representation with ministers at Conference. They also contended that the ministry should possess no official authority or pastoral prerogative, but should merely carry into effect the decisions of majorities in the different meetings. Kilham further advocated the complete separation of the Methodists from the Anglican Church. In the violent controversy that ensued he 792 wrote many pamphlets, often anonymous, and frequently not in the best of taste. For this he was arraigned before the Conference of 1796 and expelled, and he then founded the Methodist New Connexion (1798, merged since 1906 in the United Methodist Church). He died in 1798, and the success of the church he founded is a tribute to his personality and to the principles for which he strove. Kilham’s wife (Hannah Spurr, 1774-1832), whom he married only a few months before his death, became a Quaker, and worked as a missionary in the Gambia and at Sierra Leone; she reduced to writing several West African vernaculars.
KILHAM, ALEXANDER (1762-1798), English Methodist, was born in Epworth, Lincolnshire, on July 10, 1762. He was accepted by John Wesley into the regular itinerant ministry in 1785. He became the leader and spokesperson for the democratic faction in the Connexion, which pushed for laity to have the right to freely elect class leaders and stewards, along with equal representation with ministers at Conference. They argued that the ministry should hold no official authority or pastoral privilege, simply implementing the decisions made by the majority in various meetings. Kilham also promoted the complete separation of the Methodists from the Anglican Church. In the heated dispute that followed, he 792 wrote numerous pamphlets, often anonymously, and sometimes with questionable taste. For this, he was brought before the Conference in 1796 and expelled, after which he founded the Methodist New Connexion (1798, merged since 1906 into the United Methodist Church). He passed away in 1798, and the success of the church he established stands as a testament to his character and the principles he championed. Kilham’s wife, Hannah Spurr (1774-1832), whom he married just months before his death, became a Quaker and served as a missionary in Gambia and Sierra Leone; she documented several West African dialects.

KILIA, a town of S. Russia, in the government of Bessarabia, 100 m. S.W. of Odessa, on the Kilia branch of the Danube, 20 m. from its mouth. Pop. (1897), 11,703. It has steam flour-mills and a rapidly increasing trade. The town, anciently known as Chilia, Chele, and Lycostomium, was a place of banishment for political dignitaries of Byzantium in the 12th-13th centuries. After belonging to the Genoese from 1381-1403 it was occupied successively by Walachia and Moldavia, until in 1484 it fell into the hands of the Ottoman Turks. It was taken from them by the Russians in 1790. After being bombarded by the Anglo-French fleet in July 1854, it was given to Rumania on the conclusion of the war; but in 1878 was transferred to Russia with Bessarabia.
KILIA, is a town in Southern Russia, in the Bessarabia region, located 100 miles southwest of Odessa, along the Kilia branch of the Danube, 20 miles from where it meets the sea. Its population in 1897 was 11,703. The town has steam-powered flour mills and a rapidly growing trade. Historically known as Chilia, Chele, and Lycostomium, it served as a place of exile for political figures from Byzantium during the 12th and 13th centuries. After being under Genoese control from 1381 to 1403, it was occupied in turn by Walachia and Moldavia until it was taken by the Ottoman Turks in 1484. The Russians captured it from the Turks in 1790. Following a bombardment by the Anglo-French fleet in July 1854, it was handed over to Romania after the war, but in 1878 it was transferred back to Russia along with Bessarabia.

KILIAN (Chilian, Killian), ST, British missionary bishop and the apostle of eastern Franconia, where he began his labours towards the end of the 7th century. There are several biographies of him, the first of which dates back to the 9th century (Bibliotheca hagiographica latina, Nos. 4660-4663). The oldest texts which refer to him are an 8th century necrology at Würzburg and the notice by Hrabanus Maurus in his martyrology. According to Maurus, Kilian was a native of Ireland, whence with his companions he went to eastern Franconia. After having preached the gospel in Würzburg, the whole party were put to death by the orders of an unjust judge named Gozbert. It is difficult to fix the period with precision, as the judge (or duke) Gozbert is not known through other sources. Kilian’s comrades, Coloman and Totman, were, according to the Würzburg necrology, respectively priest and deacon. The elevation of the relics of the three martyrs was performed by Burchard, the first bishop of Würzburg, and they are venerated in the cathedral of that town. His festival is celebrated on the 8th of July.
KILIAN (Chilean, Killian), ST, British missionary bishop and the apostle of eastern Franconia, where he started his work towards the end of the 7th century. There are several biographies about him, the first one dating back to the 9th century (Bibliotheca hagiographica latina, Nos. 4660-4663). The oldest texts that mention him are an 8th-century necrology at Würzburg and a note by Hrabanus Maurus in his martyrology. According to Maurus, Kilian was from Ireland, and he traveled with his companions to eastern Franconia. After preaching the gospel in Würzburg, the entire group was executed under the orders of an unjust judge named Gozbert. It's hard to determine the exact time since Gozbert (the judge or duke) isn’t mentioned in other sources. Kilian’s companions, Coloman and Totman, were, according to the Würzburg necrology, a priest and a deacon, respectively. The elevating of the relics of the three martyrs was carried out by Burchard, the first bishop of Würzburg, and they are honored in the cathedral of that city. His feast day is celebrated on July 8th.
See Acta Sanctorum, Julii, ii. 599-619; F. Emmerich, Der heilige Kilian (Würzburg, 1896); J. O’Hanlon, Lives of the Irish Saints, vii. 122-143 (Dublin, 1875-1904); A. Hauck, Kirchengeschichte Deutschlands, 3rd ed., i. 382 seq.
See Acta Sanctorum, July, ii. 599-619; F. Emmerich, Saint Kilian (Würzburg, 1896); J. O’Hanlon, Lives of the Irish Saints, vii. 122-143 (Dublin, 1875-1904); A. Hauck, Church History of Germany, 3rd ed., i. 382 seq.

KILIMANJARO, a great mountain in East Africa, its centre lying in 3° 5′ S. and 37° 23′ E. It is the highest known summit of the continent, rising as a volcanic cone from a plateau of about 3000 ft. to 19,321 ft. Though completely isolated it is but one of several summits which crown the eastern edge of the great plateau of equatorial Africa. About 200 m. almost due north, across the wide expanse of the Kapte and Kikuyu uplands, lies Mount Kenya, somewhat inferior in height and mass to Kilimanjaro; and some 25 m. due west rises the noble mass of Mount Meru.
Kilimanjaro, is a massive mountain in East Africa, located at 3° 5′ S. and 37° 23′ E. It is the highest peak on the continent, rising as a volcanic cone from a plateau of about 3,000 ft. to 19,321 ft. Although it stands completely alone, it is just one of several peaks that line the eastern edge of the vast plateau of equatorial Africa. About 200 miles almost directly north, across the wide expanse of the Kapte and Kikuyu uplands, is Mount Kenya, which is slightly shorter and less massive than Kilimanjaro; and roughly 25 miles due west stands the impressive Mount Meru.
The major axis of Kilimanjaro runs almost east and west, and on it rise the two principal summits, Kibo in the west, Mawenzi (Ki-mawenzi) in the east. Kibo, the higher, is a truncated cone with a nearly perfect extinct crater, and marks a comparatively recent period of volcanic activity; while Mawenzi (16,892 ft.) is the very ancient core of a former summit, of which the crater walls have been removed by denudation. The two peaks, about 7 m. apart, are connected by a saddle or plateau, about 14,000 ft. in altitude, below which the vast mass slopes with great regularity in a typical volcanic curve, especially in the south, to the plains below. The sides are furrowed on the south and east by a large number of narrow ravines, down which flow streams which feed the Pangani and Lake Jipe in the south and the Tsavo tributary of the Sabaki in the east. South-west of Kibo, the Shira ridge seems to be of independent origin, while in the north-west a rugged group of cones, of comparatively recent origin, has poured forth vast lava-flows. In the south-east the regularity of the outline is likewise broken by a ridge running down from Mawenzi.
The main axis of Kilimanjaro runs almost east and west, featuring the two major peaks: Kibo to the west and Mawenzi (Ki-mawenzi) to the east. Kibo, which is taller, has a truncated cone shape with a nearly perfect extinct crater, indicating a relatively recent period of volcanic activity. In contrast, Mawenzi (16,892 ft.) is the ancient core of a former summit, with its crater walls worn away by erosion. The two peaks are about 7 miles apart and are connected by a saddle or plateau that sits around 14,000 ft. high, sloping downwards in a typical volcanic curve towards the plains below, especially on the south side. The slopes are cut by many narrow ravines on the south and east, where streams flow to feed the Pangani and Lake Jipe in the south as well as the Tsavo tributary of the Sabaki in the east. To the southwest of Kibo, the Shira ridge appears to have an independent origin, while to the northwest, a rugged group of cones, which are relatively recent, has released significant lava flows. In the southeast, the smooth outline is also disrupted by a ridge descending from Mawenzi.
The lava slopes of the Kibo peak are covered to a depth of some 200 ft. with an ice-cap, which, where ravines occur, takes the form of genuine glaciers. The crater walls are highest on the south, three small peaks, uncovered by ice, rising from the rim on this side. To the central and highest of these, the culminating point of the mountain, the name Kaiser Wilhelm Spitze has been given. The rim here sinks precipitously some 600 ft. to the interior of the crater, which measures rather over 2000 yds. in diameter, and is in part covered by ice, in part by a bare cone of ashes. On the west the rim is breached, allowing the passage of an important glacier formed from the snow which falls within the crater. Lower down this cleft, which owed its origin to dislocation, is occupied by two glaciers, one of which reaches a lower level (13,800 ft.) than any other on Kilimanjaro. On the north-west three large glaciers reach down to 16,000 ft.
The lava slopes of Kibo peak are covered with an ice cap about 200 ft. deep, which forms real glaciers in areas where there are ravines. The crater walls are tallest on the south side, where three small peaks not covered by ice rise from the rim. The central and highest of these peaks is called Kaiser Wilhelm Spitze. Here, the rim drops steeply about 600 ft. into the crater, which is just over 2000 yds. in diameter and is partly covered by ice and partly by a bare cone of ash. On the west side, the rim is broken, allowing an important glacier made from the snow that falls inside the crater to pass through. Lower down this gap, which was created by dislocation, there are two glaciers, one of which descends to a lower elevation (13,800 ft.) than any other on Kilimanjaro. On the northwest side, three large glaciers reach down to 16,000 ft.
Mawenzi peak has no permanent ice-cap, though at times snow lies in patches. The rock of which it is composed has become very jagged by denudation, forming stupendous walls and precipices. On the east the peak falls with great abruptness some 6500 ft. to a vast ravine, due apparently to dislocation and sinking of the ground. Below this the slope is more gradual and more symmetrical. Like the other high mountains of eastern Africa, Kilimanjaro presents well-defined zones of vegetation. The lowest slopes are arid and scantily covered with scrub, but between 4000 and 6000 ft. on the south side the slopes are well watered and cultivated. The forest zone begins, on the south, at about 6500 ft., and extends to 9500, but in the north it is narrower, and in the north-west, the driest quarter of the mountain, almost disappears. In the alpine zone, marked especially by tree lobelias and Senecio, flowering plants extend up to 15,700 ft. on the sheltered south-west flank of Mawenzi, but elsewhere vegetation grows only in dwarfed patches beyond 13,000 ft. The special fauna and flora of the upper zone are akin to those of other high African mountains, including Cameroon. The southern slopes, between 4000 and 6000 ft., form the well-peopled country of Chaga, divided into small districts.
Mawenzi Peak doesn't have a permanent ice cap, but sometimes there are patches of snow. The rock it's made of has become very jagged due to erosion, creating massive walls and cliffs. On the east side, the peak drops steeply about 6,500 feet into a huge ravine, likely caused by shifts and sinking of the ground. Below this, the slope is more gradual and symmetrical. Like other high mountains in eastern Africa, Kilimanjaro shows distinct zones of vegetation. The lowest slopes are dry and sparsely covered with scrub, but between 4,000 and 6,000 feet on the south side, the slopes are well-watered and cultivated. The forest zone starts at around 6,500 feet on the south and extends up to 9,500 feet, but in the north, it's narrower and nearly disappears in the north-west, the driest part of the mountain. In the alpine zone, highlighted by tree lobelias and Senecio, flowering plants grow up to 15,700 feet on the sheltered south-west side of Mawenzi, but elsewhere, vegetation only survives in small patches above 13,000 feet. The unique fauna and flora of the upper zone are similar to those found on other high African mountains, including Cameroon. The southern slopes, between 4,000 and 6,000 feet, make up the densely populated area of Chaga, which is divided into small districts.
As the natives believe that the summit of Kilimanjaro is composed of silver, it is conjectured that Aristotle’s reference to “the so-called Silver Mountain” from which the Nile flows was based on reports about this mountain. It is possible, however, that the “Silver Mountain” was Ruwenzori (q.v.), from whose snow-clad heights several headstreams of the Nile do descend. It is also possible, though improbable, that Ruwenzori and not Kilimanjaro nor Kenya may be the range known to Ptolemy and to the Arab geographers of the middle ages as the Mountains of the Moon. Reports of the existence of mountains covered with snow were brought to Zanzibar about 1845 by Arab traders. Attracted by these reports Johannes Rebmann of the Church Missionary Society journeyed inland from Mombasa in 1848 and discovered Kilimanjaro, which is some 200 m. inland. Rebmann’s account, though fully borne out by his colleague Dr Ludwig Krapf, was at first received with great incredulity by professional geographers. The matter was finally set at rest by the visits paid to the mountain by Baron Karl von der Decken (1861 and 1862) and Charles New (1867), the latter of whom reached the lower edge of the snow. Kilimanjaro has since been explored by Joseph Thomson (1883), Sir H. H. Johnston (1884), and others. It has been the special study of Dr Hans Meyer, who made four expeditions to it, accomplishing the first ascent to the summit in 1889. In the partition of Africa between the powers of western Europe, Kilimanjaro was secured by Germany (1886) though the first treaties concluded with native chiefs in that region had been made in 1884 by Sir H. H. Johnston on behalf of a British company. On the southern side of the mountain at Moshi is a German government station.
As the locals believe that the top of Kilimanjaro is made of silver, it’s thought that Aristotle’s reference to “the so-called Silver Mountain,” from which the Nile flows, was based on stories about this mountain. However, it’s also possible that the “Silver Mountain” referred to Ruwenzori (q.v.), which has several streams that lead down to the Nile from its snow-covered peaks. There’s a chance, although it’s unlikely, that Ruwenzori, rather than Kilimanjaro or Kenya, could be the range known to Ptolemy and the Arab geographers of the Middle Ages as the Mountains of the Moon. Reports of snowy mountains reached Zanzibar around 1845 through Arab traders. Intrigued by these reports, Johannes Rebmann from the Church Missionary Society traveled inland from Mombasa in 1848 and discovered Kilimanjaro, which is about 200 meters inland. Rebmann’s account, although fully supported by his colleague Dr. Ludwig Krapf, was initially met with significant skepticism by professional geographers. The situation was finally clarified by visits to the mountain by Baron Karl von der Decken (1861 and 1862) and Charles New (1867), the latter of whom got to the lower edge of the snow. Since then, Kilimanjaro has been explored by Joseph Thomson (1883), Sir H. H. Johnston (1884), and others. It has been particularly studied by Dr. Hans Meyer, who made four expeditions to it and achieved the first ascent to the summit in 1889. During the division of Africa among Western European powers, Kilimanjaro was claimed by Germany (1886), even though the first treaties with local chiefs in that area were signed in 1884 by Sir H. H. Johnston on behalf of a British company. On the southern side of the mountain in Moshi is a German government station.
See R. Thornton (the geologist of von der Decken’s party) in Proc. of Roy. Geog. Soc. (1861-1862); Ludwig Krapf, Travels in East Africa (1860); Charles New, Life ... in East Africa (1873); Sir J. D. Hooker in Journal of Linnean Society (1875); Sir H. H. Johnston, The Kilimanjaro Expedition (1886); Hans Meyer, Across East African Glaciers (1891); Der Kilimanjaro (Berlin, 1900). Except the last-named all these works were published in London.
See R. Thornton (the geologist from von der Decken’s team) in Proc. of Roy. Geog. Soc. (1861-1862); Ludwig Krapf, Travels in East Africa (1860); Charles New, Life ... in East Africa (1873); Sir J. D. Hooker in Journal of Linnean Society (1875); Sir H. H. Johnston, The Kilimanjaro Expedition (1886); Hans Meyer, Across East African Glaciers (1891); Der Kilimanjaro (Berlin, 1900). Except for the last one, all these works were published in London.

KILIN, or Ch’-i-lin, one of the four symbolical creatures which in Chinese mythology are believed to keep watch and ward over the Celestial Empire. It is a unicorn, portrayed in Chinese art as having the body and legs of a deer and an ox’s 793 tail. Its advent on earth heralds an age of enlightened government and civic prosperity. It is regarded as the noblest of the animal creation and as the incarnation of fire, water, wood, metal and earth. It lives for a thousand years, and is believed to step so softly as to leave no footprints and to crush no living thing.
KILIN, or Chilin, is one of the four mythical creatures in Chinese mythology that are said to watch over the Celestial Empire. It resembles a unicorn and is depicted in Chinese art with the body and legs of a deer and the tail of an ox. Its arrival on earth signals a time of wise governance and community well-being. It is considered the most noble among animals and represents the elements of fire, water, wood, metal, and earth. It is said to live for a thousand years and is believed to move so lightly that it leaves no footprints and harms no living thing. 793

KILKEE, a seaside resort of county Clare, Ireland, the terminus of a branch of the West Clare railway. Pop. (1901), 1661. It lies on a small and picturesque inlet of the Atlantic named Moore Bay, with a beautiful sweep of sandy beach. The coast, fully exposed to the open ocean, abounds in fine cliff scenery, including numerous caves and natural arches, but is notoriously dangerous to shipping. Moore Bay is safe and attractive for bathers. Bishop’s Island, a bold isolated rock in the vicinity, has remains of an oratory and house ascribed to the recluse St Senan.
KILKEE, is a seaside resort in County Clare, Ireland, and the end point of a branch of the West Clare railway. Population (1901) was 1,661. It is located on a small and scenic inlet of the Atlantic called Moore Bay, featuring a beautiful stretch of sandy beach. The coastline, fully exposed to the open ocean, is filled with stunning cliffs, including many caves and natural arches, but is notoriously hazardous for ships. Moore Bay is safe and appealing for swimmers. Bishop’s Island, a striking isolated rock nearby, has remains of an oratory and a house linked to the recluse St. Senan.

KILKENNY, a county of Ireland, in the province of Leinster, bounded N. by Queen’s County, E. by Carlow and Wexford, S. by Waterford, and W. by Waterford and Tipperary. The area is 511,775 acres, or about 800 sq. m. The greater part of Kilkenny forms the south-eastern extremity of the great central plain of Ireland, but in the south-east occurs an extension of the mountains of Wicklow and Carlow, and the plain is interrupted in the north by a hilly region forming part of the Castlecomer coal-field, which extends also into Queen’s County and Tipperary. The principal rivers, the Suir, the Barrow and the Nore, have their origin in the Slieve Bloom Mountains (county Tipperary and Queen’s County), and after widely divergent courses southward discharge their waters into Waterford Harbour. The Suir forms the boundary of the county with Waterford, and is navigable for small vessels to Carrick. The Nore, which is navigable to Innistioge, enters the county at its north-western boundary, and flows by Kilkenny to the Barrow, 9 m. above Ross, having received the King’s River at Jerpoint and the Argula near Innistioge. The Barrow, which is navigable beyond the limits of Kilkenny into Kildare, forms the eastern boundary of the county from near New Bridge. There are no lakes of any extent, but turloughs or temporary lakes are occasionally formed by the bursting up of underground streams.
KILKENNY, is a county in Ireland, located in the province of Leinster, bordered to the north by Queen’s County, to the east by Carlow and Wexford, to the south by Waterford, and to the west by Waterford and Tipperary. The area covers 511,775 acres, which is about 800 square miles. Most of Kilkenny makes up the south-eastern tip of Ireland's large central plain, but in the southeast, there's an extension of the Wicklow and Carlow mountains. The northern part of the county has a hilly area that's part of the Castlecomer coal field, which also extends into Queen’s County and Tipperary. The main rivers, the Suir, the Barrow, and the Nore, originate in the Slieve Bloom Mountains (in Tipperary and Queen’s County) and flow southward, eventually emptying into Waterford Harbour. The Suir serves as the boundary between the county and Waterford, and it's navigable for small boats up to Carrick. The Nore, which can be navigated up to Innistioge, starts at the county's northwestern border and flows past Kilkenny to the Barrow, 9 miles upstream from Ross, where it receives the King’s River at Jerpoint and the Argula near Innistioge. The Barrow is navigable beyond Kilkenny into Kildare and creates the county's eastern border starting near New Bridge. There are no significant lakes, but turloughs or temporary lakes can form when underground streams overflow.
The coal of the Castlecomer basin is anthracite, and the most productive portions of the bed are in the centre of the basin at Castlecomer. Hematitic iron of a rich quality is found in the Cambro-Silurian rocks at several places; and tradition asserts that silver shields were made about 850 B.C. at Argetros or Silverwood on the Nore. Manganese is obtained in some of the limestone quarries, and also near the Barrow. Marl is abundant in various districts. Pipeclay and potter’s clay are found, and also yellow ochre. Copper occurs near Knocktopher.
The coal from the Castlecomer basin is anthracite, with the most productive areas located in the center of the basin at Castlecomer. High-quality hematitic iron is found in the Cambro-Silurian rocks at several locations; it's said that silver shields were crafted around 850 BCE at Argetros or Silverwood on the Nore. Manganese is sourced from some limestone quarries and also near the Barrow. Marl is plentiful in various areas. Pipeclay and potter's clay are available, along with yellow ochre. Copper is found near Knocktopher.
The high synclinal coal-field forms the most important feature of the north of the county. A prolongation of the field runs out south-west by Tullaroan. The lower ground is occupied by Carboniferous limestone. The Old Red Sandstone, with a Silurian core, forms the high ridge of Slievenaman in the south; and its upper laminated beds contain Archanodon, the earliest known freshwater mollusc, and plant-remains, at Kiltorcan near Ballyhale. The Leinster granite appears mainly as inliers in the Silurian of the south-east. The Carboniferous sandstones furnish the hard pavement-slabs sold as “Carlow flags.” The black limestone with white shells in it at Kilkenny is quarried as an ornamental marble. Good slates are quarried at Kilmoganny, in the Silurian inlier on the Slievenaman range.
The high synclinal coal field is the main feature of the northern part of the county. A stretch of the field extends southwest towards Tullaroan. The lower areas are made up of Carboniferous limestone. The Old Red Sandstone, with a Silurian core, creates the high ridge of Slievenaman in the south, and its upper layered beds contain Archanodon, the earliest known freshwater mollusk, along with plant remains, at Kiltorcan near Ballyhale. The Leinster granite mainly appears as inliers within the Silurian in the southeast. The Carboniferous sandstones provide the tough pavement slabs known as “Carlow flags.” The black limestone featuring white shells at Kilkenny is quarried as decorative marble. High-quality slates are extracted at Kilmoganny, in the Silurian inlier on the Slievenaman range.
On account of the slope of the country, and the nature of the soil, the surface occupied by bog or wet land is very small, and the air is dry and healthy. So temperate is it in winter that the myrtle and arbutus grow in the open air. There is less rain than at Dublin, and vegetation is earlier than in the adjacent counties. Along the banks of the Suir, Nore and Barrow a very rich soil has been formed by alluvial deposits. Above the Coal-measures in the northern part of the county there is a moorland tract devoted chiefly to pasturage. The soil above the limestone is for the most part a deep and rich loam admirably adapted for the growth of wheat. The heath-covered hills afford honey with a flavour of peculiar excellence. Proportionately to its area, Kilkenny has an exceptionally large cultivable area. The proportion of tillage to pasturage is roughly as 1 to 2¼. Oats, barley, turnips and potatoes are all grown; the cultivation of wheat has very largely lapsed. Cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry are extensively reared, the Kerry cattle being in considerable request.
Due to the slope of the land and the type of soil, the area covered by bog or wetland is very small, and the air is dry and healthy. Winter temperatures are mild enough for myrtle and arbutus to grow outdoors. There’s less rain than in Dublin, and plants bloom earlier than in nearby counties. Along the banks of the Suir, Nore, and Barrow, a rich soil has formed from alluvial deposits. Above the coal measures in the northern part of the county, there’s a moorland area mainly used for grazing. The soil above the limestone is mostly a deep, rich loam that’s perfect for wheat cultivation. The heath-covered hills produce honey with a uniquely excellent flavor. For its size, Kilkenny has an unusually large amount of arable land. The ratio of tillage to pasture is roughly 1 to 2.25. Oats, barley, turnips, and potatoes are all grown here, although wheat cultivation has significantly decreased. Cattle, sheep, pigs, and poultry are raised extensively, with Kerry cattle being quite popular.
The linen manufacture introduced into the county in the 17th century by the duke of Ormonde to supersede the woollen manufacture gradually became extinct, and the woollen manufacture now carried on is also very small. There are, however, breweries, distilleries, tanneries and flour-mills, as well as marble polishing works. The county is traversed from N. to S. by the Maryborough, Kilkenny and Waterford branch of the Great Southern & Western railway, with a connexion from Kilkenny to Bagenalstown on the Kildare and Carlow line; and the Waterford and Limerick line of the same company runs for a short distance through the southern part of the county.
The linen production introduced to the county in the 17th century by the Duke of Ormonde to replace the wool industry gradually faded away, and the wool industry currently in operation is also quite small. However, there are breweries, distilleries, tanneries, and flour mills, as well as marble polishing works. The county is crossed from north to south by the Maryborough, Kilkenny, and Waterford branch of the Great Southern & Western railway, with a connection from Kilkenny to Bagenalstown on the Kildare and Carlow line; and the Waterford and Limerick line of the same company runs for a short distance through the southern part of the county.
The population (87,496 in 1891; 79,159 in 1901) includes about 94% of Roman Catholics. The decrease of population is a little above the average, though emigration is distinctly below it. The chief towns and villages are Kilkenny (q.v.), Callan (1840), Castlecomer, Thomastown and Graigue. The county comprises 10 baronies and contains 134 civil parishes. The county includes the parliamentary borough of Kilkenny, and is divided into north and south parliamentary divisions, each returning one member. Kilkenny returned 16 members to the Irish parliament, two representing the county. Assizes are held at Kilkenny, and quarter sessions at Kilkenny, Pilltown, Urlingford, Castlecomer, Callan, Grace’s Old Castle and Thomastown. The county is in the Protestant diocese of Ossory and the Roman Catholic dioceses of Ossory and Kildare and Leighlin.
The population (87,496 in 1891; 79,159 in 1901) consists of about 94% Roman Catholics. The population decline is slightly above average, although emigration is notably below it. The main towns and villages are Kilkenny (q.v.), Callan (1840), Castlecomer, Thomastown, and Graigue. The county has 10 baronies and includes 134 civil parishes. It contains the parliamentary borough of Kilkenny and is split into northern and southern parliamentary divisions, with each electing one member. Kilkenny sent 16 members to the Irish parliament, with two representing the county. Assizes are held in Kilkenny, and quarter sessions take place in Kilkenny, Pilltown, Urlingford, Castlecomer, Callan, Grace’s Old Castle, and Thomastown. The county is part of the Protestant diocese of Ossory and the Roman Catholic dioceses of Ossory and Kildare and Leighlin.
Kilkenny is one of the counties generally considered to have been created by King John. It had previously formed part of the kingdom of Ossory, and was one of the liberties granted to the heiresses of Strongbow with palatinate rights. Circular groups of stones of very ancient origin are on the summits of Slieve Grian and the hill of Cloghmanta. There are a large number of cromlechs as well as raths (or encampments) in various parts of the county. Besides numerous forts and mounds there are five round towers, one adjoining the Protestant cathedral of Kilkenny, and others at Tulloherin, Kilree, Fertagh and Aghaviller. All, except that at Aghaviller, are nearly perfect. There are remains of a Cistercian monastery at Jerpoint, said to have been founded by Dunnough, King of Ossory, and of another belonging to the same order at Graigue, founded by the earl of Pembroke in 1212. The Dominicans had an abbey at Rosbercon founded in 1267, and another at Thomastown, of which there are some remains. The Carmelites had a monastery at Knocktopher. There were an Augustinian monastery at Inistioge, and priories at Callan and Kells, of all of which there are remains. There are also ruins of several old castles, such as those of Callan, Legan, Grenan and Clonamery, besides the ancient portions of Kilkenny Castle.
Kilkenny is one of the counties typically thought to have been established by King John. It used to be part of the kingdom of Ossory and was one of the liberties given to the heiresses of Strongbow with palatinate rights. There are ancient stone circles on the summits of Slieve Grian and the hill of Cloghmanta. The county is home to many cromlechs and raths (or encampments) in various locations. In addition to several forts and mounds, there are five round towers, one next to the Protestant cathedral in Kilkenny, and others at Tulloherin, Kilree, Fertagh, and Aghaviller. All except the one at Aghaviller are nearly intact. There are remains of a Cistercian monastery at Jerpoint, which is said to have been founded by Dunnough, King of Ossory, and another belonging to the same order at Graigue, founded by the Earl of Pembroke in 1212. The Dominicans had an abbey at Rosbercon established in 1267, and another at Thomastown, where some remnants still exist. The Carmelites established a monastery at Knocktopher. There was an Augustinian monastery at Inistioge, and priories at Callan and Kells, all of which have remains. Ruins of several old castles can also be found, such as those at Callan, Legan, Grenan, and Clonamery, in addition to the ancient sections of Kilkenny Castle.

KILKENNY, a city and municipal and parliamentary borough (returning one member), the capital of county Kilkenny, Ireland, finely situated on the Nore, and on the Great Southern and Western railway, 81 m. S.W. of Dublin. Pop. (1901), 10,609. It consists of Englishtown (or Kilkenny proper) and Irishtown, which are separated by a small rivulet, but although Irishtown retains its name, it is now included in the borough of Kilkenny. The city is irregularly built, possesses several spacious streets with many good houses, while its beautiful environs and imposing ancient buildings give it an unusual interest and picturesque appearance. The Nore is crossed by two handsome bridges. The cathedral of St Canice, from whom the town takes its name, dates in its present form from about 1255. The see of Ossory, which originated in the monastery of Aghaboe founded by St Canice in the 6th century, and took its name from the early kingdom of Ossory, was moved to Kilkenny (according to conjecture) about the year 1200. In 1835 the diocese of Ferns and Leighlin was united to it. With the exception of St Patrick’s, Dublin, the cathedral is the largest 794 ecclesiastical building in Ireland, having a length from east to west of 226 ft., and a breadth along the transepts from north to south of 123 ft. It occupies an eminence at the western extremity of Irishtown. It is a cruciform structure mainly in Early English style, with a low massive tower supported on clustered columns of the black marble peculiar to the district. The building was extensively restored in 1865. It contains many old sepulchral monuments and other ancient memorials. The north transept incorporates the parish church. The adjacent library of St Canice contains numerous ancient books of great value. A short distance from the south transept is a round tower 100 ft. high; the original cap is wanting. The episcopal palace near the east end of the cathedral was erected in the time of Edward III. and enlarged in 1735. Besides the cathedral the principal churches are the Protestant church of St Mary, a plain cruciform structure of earlier foundation than the present cathedral; that of St John, including a portion of the hospital of St John founded about 1220; and the Roman Catholic cathedral, of the diocese of Ossory, dedicated to St Mary (1843-1857), a cruciform structure in the Early Pointed style, with a massive central tower. There are important remains of two monasteries—the Dominican abbey founded in 1225, and now used as a Roman Catholic church; and the Franciscan abbey on the banks of the Nore, founded about 1230. But next in importance to the cathedral is the castle, the seat of the marquess of Ormonde, on the summit of a precipice above the Nore. It was originally built by Strongbow, but rebuilt by William Marshall after the destruction of the first castle in 1175; and many additions and restorations by members of the Ormonde family have maintained it as a princely residence. The Protestant college of St John, originally founded by Pierce Butler, 8th earl of Ormonde, in the 16th century, and re-endowed in 1684 by James, 1st duke of Ormonde, stands on the banks of the river opposite the castle. In it Swift, Farquhar, Congreve and Bishop Berkeley received part of their education. On the outskirts of the city is the Roman Catholic college of St Kyran (Kieran), a Gothic building completed about 1840. The other principal buildings are the modern court-house, the tholsel or city court (1764), the city and county prison, the barracks and the county infirmary. In the neighbourhood are collieries as well as long-established quarries for marble, the manufactures connected with which are an important industry of the town. The city also possesses corn-mills, breweries and tanneries. Not far from the city are the remarkable limestone caverns of Dunmore, which have yielded numerous human remains. The corporation of Kilkenny consists of a mayor, 6 aldermen and 18 councillors.
KILKENNY, is a city and a municipal and parliamentary borough (returning one member), the capital of County Kilkenny, Ireland. It’s beautifully located on the River Nore and on the Great Southern and Western railway, 81 miles southwest of Dublin. The population in 1901 was 10,609. It includes Englishtown (or Kilkenny proper) and Irishtown, which are separated by a small stream. Although Irishtown keeps its name, it's now part of the borough of Kilkenny. The city is built in an irregular fashion, featuring several wide streets with many nice houses, while its lovely surroundings and impressive ancient buildings make it particularly interesting and picturesque. The Nore is crossed by two attractive bridges. The Cathedral of St. Canice, after whom the town is named, is primarily from around 1255. The see of Ossory, which originated from the monastery of Aghaboe founded by St. Canice in the 6th century and took its name from the early kingdom of Ossory, was likely moved to Kilkenny around 1200. In 1835, the diocese of Ferns and Leighlin was merged with it. Aside from St. Patrick’s in Dublin, the cathedral is the largest ecclesiastical building in Ireland, measuring 226 feet in length from east to west, and 123 feet in width across the transepts from north to south. It is positioned on a rise at the western end of Irishtown. The structure is cross-shaped, mainly designed in Early English style, featuring a low, massive tower supported by clustered columns made from the local black marble. The building underwent extensive restoration in 1865. It houses many old tomb monuments and other ancient memorials. The north transept includes the parish church. The nearby Library of St. Canice contains numerous valuable ancient books. A short distance from the south transept is a round tower standing 100 feet high, although the original cap is missing. The episcopal palace located near the east end of the cathedral was built during the time of Edward III and was expanded in 1735. Alongside the cathedral, the main churches are the Protestant Church of St. Mary, a simple cross-shaped building older than the current cathedral; St. John’s Church, which includes part of the hospital of St. John founded around 1220; and the Roman Catholic cathedral, part of the Diocese of Ossory, dedicated to St. Mary (built between 1843-1857), also a cross-shaped structure in the Early Pointed style with a solid central tower. There are significant remains of two monasteries: the Dominican Abbey founded in 1225, now used as a Roman Catholic church, and the Franciscan Abbey along the banks of the Nore, founded around 1230. However, the castle, the residence of the Marquess of Ormonde, is next in importance to the cathedral. It stands atop a cliff overlooking the Nore. Originally built by Strongbow, it was rebuilt by William Marshall after the first castle was destroyed in 1175, and various expansions and restorations by the Ormonde family have kept it as an impressive residence. The Protestant College of St. John, originally founded by Pierce Butler, the 8th Earl of Ormonde, in the 16th century, and re-endowed in 1684 by James, the 1st Duke of Ormonde, is located on the riverbanks opposite the castle. Swift, Farquhar, Congreve, and Bishop Berkeley all did part of their education there. On the outskirts of the city is the Roman Catholic College of St. Kyran (Kieran), a Gothic building completed around 1840. Other significant buildings include the modern courthouse, the tholsel or city court (established in 1764), the city and county prison, the barracks, and the county infirmary. Nearby, there are coal mines as well as long-established marble quarries, which serve as an important industry for the town. The city also has corn mills, breweries, and tanneries. Not far from the city are the remarkable limestone caves of Dunmore, which have revealed numerous human remains. The Kilkenny corporation consists of a mayor, six aldermen, and eighteen councillors.
Kilkenny proper owes its origin to an English settlement in the time of Strongbow, and it received a charter from William Marshall, who married Strongbow’s daughter. This charter was confirmed by Edward III., and from Edward IV. Irishtown received the privilege of choosing a portreeve independent of Kilkenny. By Elizabeth the boroughs, while retaining their distinct rights, were constituted one corporation, which in 1609 was made a free borough by James I., and in the following year a free city. From James II. the citizens received a new charter, constituting the city and liberties a distinct county, to be styled the county of the city of Kilkenny, the burgesses of Irishtown continuing, however, to elect a portreeve until the passing of the Muncipal Reform Act. Frequent parliaments were held at Kilkenny from the 14th to the 16th century, and so late as the reign of Henry VIII. it was the occasional residence of the lord-lieutenant. In 1642 it was the meeting-place of the assembly of confederate Catholics. In 1648 Cromwell, in the hope of obtaining possession of the town by means of a plot, advanced towards it, but before his arrival the plot was discovered. In 1650 it was, however, compelled to surrender after a long and resolute defence. At a very early period Kilkenny and Irishtown returned each two members to the Irish parliament, but since the Union one member only has been returned to Westminster for the city of Kilkenny.
Kilkenny itself started as an English settlement during Strongbow's time and received a charter from William Marshall, who married Strongbow’s daughter. This charter was confirmed by Edward III, and Edward IV granted Irishtown the right to choose a portreeve independently from Kilkenny. By Elizabeth's time, the boroughs maintained their unique rights but were formed into one corporation, which James I made a free borough in 1609, and then a free city the following year. James II provided the citizens with a new charter, making the city and its liberties a distinct county known as the county of the city of Kilkenny, with the burgesses of Irishtown still electing a portreeve until the Municipal Reform Act was passed. Frequent parliaments were held in Kilkenny from the 14th to the 16th century, and as late as Henry VIII's reign, it served as the occasional residence of the lord-lieutenant. In 1642, it was where the assembly of confederate Catholics met. In 1648, Cromwell tried to take the town through a plot, but the plan was discovered before he arrived. However, in 1650, Kilkenny had to surrender after a long and strong defense. Early on, Kilkenny and Irishtown each sent two members to the Irish parliament, but since the Union, only one member has been sent to Westminster for the city of Kilkenny.
The origin of the expression “to fight like Kilkenny cats,” which, according to the legend, fought till only their tails were left, has been the subject of many conjectures. It is said to be an allegory on the disastrous municipal quarrels of Kilkenny and Irishtown which lasted from the end of the 14th to the end of the 17th centuries (Notes and Queries, 1st series, vol. ii. p. 71). It is referred also to the brutal sport of some Hessian soldiers, quartered in Kilkenny during the rebellions of 1798 or 1803, who tied two cats together by their tails, hung them over a line and left them to fight. A soldier is said to have freed them by cutting off their tails to escape censure from the officers (ibid. 3rd series, vol. v. p. 433). Lastly, it is attributed to the invention of J. P. Curran. As a sarcastic protest against cock-fighting in England, he declared that he had witnessed in Sligo (?) fights between trained cats, and that once they had fought so fiercely that only their tails were left (ibid. 7th series, vol. ii. p. 394).
The phrase “to fight like Kilkenny cats,” which legend says fought until only their tails remained, has sparked various theories about its origin. It’s believed to be a metaphor for the destructive municipal disputes between Kilkenny and Irishtown that occurred from the late 14th to the late 17th centuries (Notes and Queries, 1st series, vol. ii. p. 71). It’s also linked to a brutal game played by some Hessian soldiers stationed in Kilkenny during the rebellions of 1798 or 1803, who would tie two cats together by their tails, hang them from a line, and let them fight. One soldier reportedly freed the cats by cutting off their tails to avoid getting in trouble with the officers (ibid. 3rd series, vol. v. p. 433). Lastly, it’s credited to J. P. Curran, who, as a sarcastic protest against cock-fighting in England, claimed to have seen fights between trained cats in Sligo (?), stating that they fought so fiercely that only their tails were left (ibid. 7th series, vol. ii. p. 394).

KILKENNY, STATUTE OF, the name given to a body of laws promulgated in 1366 with the object of strengthening the English authority in Ireland. In 1361, when Edward III. was on the English throne, he sent one of his younger sons, Lionel, duke of Clarence, who was already married to an Irish heiress, to represent him in Ireland. From the English point of view the country was in a most unsatisfactory condition. Lawless and predatory, the English settlers were hardly distinguishable from the native Irish, and the authority of the English king over both had been reduced to vanishing point. In their efforts to cope with the prevailing disorder Lionel and his advisers summoned a parliament to meet at Kilkenny early in 1366 and here the statute of Kilkenny was passed into law. This statute was written in Norman-French, and nineteen of its clauses are merely repetitions of some ordinances which had been drawn up at Kilkenny fifteen years earlier. It began by relating how the existing state of lawlessness was due to the malign influence exercised by the Irish over the English, and, like Magna Carta, its first positive provision declared that the church should be free. As a prime remedy for the prevailing evils all marriages between the two races were forbidden. Englishmen must not speak the Irish tongue, nor receive Irish minstrels into their dwellings, nor even ride in the Irish fashion; while to give or sell horses or armour to the Irish was made a treasonable offence. Moreover English and not Breton law was to be employed, and no Irishman could legally be received into a religious house, nor presented to a benefice. The statute also contained clauses for compelling the English settlers to keep the laws. For each county four wardens of the peace were to be appointed, while the sheriffs were to hold their tourns twice a year and were not to oppress the people by their exactions. An attempt was made to prevent the emigration of labourers, and finally the spiritual arm was invoked to secure obedience to these laws by threats of excommunication. The statute, although marking an interesting stage in the history of Ireland, had very little practical effect.
KILKENNY, STATUTE OF, is the name given to a set of laws established in 1366 aimed at reinforcing English authority in Ireland. In 1361, while Edward III was king of England, he sent one of his younger sons, Lionel, duke of Clarence, who was already married to an Irish heiress, to represent him in Ireland. From the English perspective, the country was in a very problematic state. Lawless and aggressive, the English settlers were almost indistinguishable from the native Irish, and the authority of the English king over both groups had almost disappeared. To address the ongoing chaos, Lionel and his advisers called a parliament to meet in Kilkenny in early 1366, where the statute of Kilkenny was enacted. This statute was written in Norman-French, and nineteen of its clauses were simply repetitions of some regulations established in Kilkenny fifteen years earlier. It began by explaining how the current lawlessness was caused by the harmful influence of the Irish on the English, and like the Magna Carta, its first clear rule stated that the church should be independent. To tackle the existing issues, all marriages between the two groups were banned. Englishmen were prohibited from speaking the Irish language, allowing Irish musicians into their homes, or even riding in the Irish manner; selling or giving horses or armor to the Irish was made a treasonous act. Additionally, English law, not Breton law, was to be enforced, and no Irish person could officially be received into a religious institution or appointed to a church position. The statute also included provisions to ensure the English settlers adhered to these laws. Four wardens of the peace were to be appointed for each county, and sheriffs were required to hold their courts twice a year without exploiting the people through excessive demands. Efforts were made to prevent laborers from migrating, and finally, the church was called upon to enforce compliance with these laws by threatening excommunication. Although the statute represents an interesting chapter in Ireland's history, it had very little practical impact.
The full text is published in the Statutes and Ordinances of Ireland. John to Henry V., by H. F. Berry (1907).
The full text is published in the Statutes and Ordinances of Ireland. John to Henry V., by H. F. Berry (1907).

KILLALA (pron. Killálla), a small town on the north coast of county Mayo, Ireland, in the northern parliamentary division, on the western shore of a fine bay to which it gives name. Pop. (1901), 510. It is a terminus of a branch of the Midland Great Western railway. Its trade is almost wholly diverted to Ballina on the river Moy, which enters the bay, but Killala is of high antiquarian and historical interest. It was for many centuries a bishop’s see, the foundation being attributed to St Patrick in the 5th century, but the diocese was joined with Achonry early in the 17th century and with Tuam in 1833. The cathedral church of St Patrick is a plain structure of the 17th century. There is a fine souterrain, evidently connected with a rath, or encampment, in the graveyard. A round tower, 84 ft. in height, stands boldly on an isolated eminence. Close to Killala the French under Humbert landed in 1798, being diverted by contrary winds from the Donegal coast. Near the Moy river, south of Killala, are the abbeys of Moyne and Roserk or Rosserick, both Decorated in style, and both possessing fine cloisters. At Rathfran, 2 m. N., is a Dominican abbey (1274), and in the neighbourhood are camps, cromlechs, and an inscribed ogham stone, 12 ft. in height. Killala gives name to a Roman Catholic diocese, the seat of which, however, is at Ballina.
KILLALA (pron. Killálla) is a small town on the north coast of County Mayo, Ireland, in the northern parliamentary division, situated on the western shore of a beautiful bay that bears its name. Population (1901): 510. It is the endpoint of a branch of the Midland Great Western railway. Most of its trade goes to Ballina on the River Moy, which flows into the bay, but Killala has significant historical and archaeological importance. For many centuries, it was a bishop's see, with its founding credited to St. Patrick in the 5th century, though the diocese was merged with Achonry in the early 17th century and Tuam in 1833. The cathedral church of St. Patrick is a simple structure from the 17th century. There is an impressive souterrain linked to a rath, or encampment, found in the graveyard. An 84-foot tall round tower stands prominently on a solitary hill. Near Killala, the French forces under Humbert landed in 1798 after being blown off course from the Donegal coast. Close to the Moy River, south of Killala, are the abbeys of Moyne and Roserk or Rosserick, both in the Decorated style and featuring impressive cloisters. To the north at Rathfran, 2 miles away, there is a Dominican abbey (1274), and the area has various camps, cromlechs, and an inscribed ogham stone that stands 12 feet tall. Killala also lends its name to a Roman Catholic diocese, although its seat is located in Ballina.

KILLALOE, a town of county Clare, Ireland, in the east parliamentary division, at the lower extremity of Lough Derg on the river Shannon, at the foot of the Slieve Bernagh mountains. Pop. (1901), 885. It is connected, so as to form one town, with Ballina (county Tipperary) by a bridge of 13 arches. Ballina is the terminus of a branch of the Great Southern and Western railway, 15 m. N.E. of Limerick. Slate is quarried in the vicinity, and there were formerly woollen manufactures. The cathedral of St Flannan occupies the site of a church founded by St Dalua in the 6th century. The present building is mainly of the 12th century, a good cruciform example of the period, preserving, however, a magnificent Romanesque doorway. It was probably completed by Donall O’Brien, king of Munster, but part of the fabric dates from a century before his time. In the churchyard is an ancient oratory said to date from the period of St Dalua. Near Killaloe stood Brian Boru’s palace of Kincora, celebrated in verse by Moore; for this was the capital of the kings of Munster. Killaloe is frequented by anglers for the Shannon salmon-fishing and for trout-fishing in Lough Derg. Killaloe gives name to Protestant and Roman Catholic dioceses.
KILLALOE, is a town in County Clare, Ireland, in the eastern parliamentary division, located at the southern end of Lough Derg on the River Shannon, at the base of the Slieve Bernagh mountains. Population (1901): 885. It's connected to Ballina (County Tipperary) by a bridge with 13 arches, forming one town. Ballina is the end point of a branch of the Great Southern and Western railway, 15 miles northeast of Limerick. Slate is quarried nearby, and there used to be woolen manufacturing. The Cathedral of St. Flannan is built on the site of a church founded by St. Dalua in the 6th century. The current structure mainly dates from the 12th century and is a notable cruciform example of that time, although it still features a stunning Romanesque doorway. It was likely finished by Donall O’Brien, king of Munster, but some parts of the building are from a century earlier. In the churchyard, there's an old oratory said to have been built during St. Dalua's time. Near Killaloe was Brian Boru’s palace of Kincora, well-known in poems by Moore; this was the capital of the kings of Munster. Killaloe is a popular spot for anglers due to the salmon fishing in the Shannon and trout fishing in Lough Derg. Killaloe is also the name for both Protestant and Roman Catholic dioceses.

KILLARNEY, a market town of county Kerry, Ireland, in the east parliamentary division, on a branch line of the Great Southern & Western railway, 185¼ m. S.W. from Dublin. Pop. of urban district (1901), 5656. On account of the beautiful scenery in the neighbourhood the town is much frequented by tourists. The principal buildings are the Roman Catholic cathedral and bishop’s palace of the diocese of Kerry, designed by A. W. Pugin, a large Protestant church and several hotels. Adjoining the town is the mansion of the earl of Kenmare. There is a school of arts and crafts, where carving and inlaying are prosecuted. The only manufacture of importance now carried on at Killarney is that of fancy articles from arbutus wood; but it owed its origin to iron-smelting works, for which abundant fuel was obtained from the neighbouring forests.
KILLARNEY, is a market town in County Kerry, Ireland, located in the eastern parliamentary division, on a branch line of the Great Southern & Western Railway, 185¼ miles southwest of Dublin. The population of the urban district was 5,656 in 1901. Due to the stunning scenery in the area, the town attracts many tourists. The main buildings include the Roman Catholic cathedral and bishop’s palace of the Diocese of Kerry, designed by A. W. Pugin, a large Protestant church, and several hotels. Next to the town is the mansion of the Earl of Kenmare. There is also a school of arts and crafts, where carving and inlaying are practiced. The only significant manufacturing currently taking place in Killarney is the production of fancy items made from arbutus wood, though it originally stemmed from iron-smelting works that used abundant fuel from the nearby forests.
The lakes of Killarney, about 1½ m. from the town, lie in a basin between several lofty mountain groups, some of which rise abruptly from the water’s edge, and all clothed with trees and shrubbery almost to their summits. The lower lake, or Lough Leane (area 5001 acres), is studded with finely wooded islands, on the largest of which, Ross Island, are the ruins of Ross Castle, an old fortress of the O’Donoghues; and on another island, the “sweet Innisfallen” of Moore, are the picturesque ruins of an abbey founded by St Finian the leper at the close of the 6th century. Between the lower lake and the middle or Torc lake (680 acres in extent) stands Muckross Abbey, built by Franciscans about 1440. With the upper lake (430 acres), thickly studded with islands, and close shut in by mountains, the lower and middle lakes are connected by the Long Range, a winding and finely wooded channel, 2½ m. in length, and commanding magnificent views of the mountains. Midway in its course is a famous echo caused by the Eagle’s Nest, a lofty pyramidal rock.
The lakes of Killarney, located about 1½ miles from the town, are situated in a basin surrounded by several tall mountain ranges, some of which rise steeply from the water’s edge, all covered in trees and shrubs almost to their peaks. The lower lake, or Lough Leane (with an area of 5,001 acres), features beautifully wooded islands, the largest of which is Ross Island, home to the ruins of Ross Castle, an ancient fortress of the O’Donoghues. On another island, known as the "sweet Innisfallen" from Moore's poem, are the picturesque ruins of an abbey founded by St. Finian the leper in the late 6th century. Between the lower lake and the middle lake, or Torc Lake (which covers 680 acres), stands Muckross Abbey, built by Franciscans around 1440. The upper lake (430 acres), densely dotted with islands and surrounded by mountains, connects the lower and middle lakes through the Long Range, a winding and beautifully wooded channel that stretches 2½ miles and offers stunning views of the mountains. Halfway along its path is a famous echo produced by Eagle’s Nest, a tall pyramidal rock.
Besides the lakes of Killarney themselves, the immediate neighbourhood includes many features of natural beauty and of historic interest. Among the first are Macgillicuddy’s Reeks and the Torc and Purple Mountains, the famous pass known as the Gap of Dunloe, Mount Mangerton, with a curious depression (the Devil’s Punchbowl) near its summit, the waterfalls of Torc and Derrycunihy, and Lough Guitane, above Lough Leane. Notable ruins and remains, besides Muckross and Innisfallen, include Aghadoe, with its ruined church of the 12th century (formerly a cathedral) and remains of a round tower; and the Ogham Cave of Dunloe, a souterrain containing inscribed stones. The waters of the neighbourhood provide trout and salmon, and the flora is of high interest to the botanist. Innumerable legends centre round the traditional hero O’Donoghue.
Besides the lakes of Killarney, the surrounding area has many beautiful natural features and historic sites. Among these are the Macgillicuddy’s Reeks, the Torc and Purple Mountains, the famous pass known as the Gap of Dunloe, and Mount Mangerton, which has a unique depression called the Devil’s Punchbowl near its peak. There are also the waterfalls of Torc and Derrycunihy, and Lough Guitane, located above Lough Leane. Significant ruins and remains, in addition to Muckross and Innisfallen, include Aghadoe with its 12th-century ruined church (once a cathedral) and the remains of a round tower, as well as the Ogham Cave of Dunloe, a souterrain with inscribed stones. The waters in the area are home to trout and salmon, and the local plant life is of great interest to botanists. Numerous legends are centered around the traditional hero O’Donoghue.

KILLDEER, a common American plover, so called in imitation of its whistling cry, the Charadrius vociferus of Linnaeus, and the Aegialitis vocifera of modern ornithologists. About the size of a snipe, it is mostly sooty-brown above, but showing a bright buff on the tail coverts, and in flight a white bar on the wings; beneath it is pure white except two pectoral bands of deep black. It is one of the finest as well as the largest of the group commonly known as ringed plovers or ring dotterels,1 forming the genus Aegialitis of Boie. Mostly wintering in the south or only on the sea-shore of the more northern states, in spring it spreads widely over the interior, breeding on the newly ploughed lands or on open grass-fields. The nest is made in a slight hollow, and is often surrounded with small pebbles and fragments of shells. Here the hen lays her pear-shaped, stone-coloured eggs, four in number, and always arranged with their pointed ends touching each other, as is the custom of most Limicoline birds. The parents exhibit the greatest anxiety for their offspring on the approach of an intruder. It is the best-known bird of its family in the United States, where it is less abundant in the north-east than farther south or west. In Canada it does not range farther northward than 56° N.; it is not known in Greenland, and hardly in Labrador, though it is a passenger in Newfoundland every spring and autumn.2 In winter it finds its way to Bermuda and to some of the Antilles, but it is not recorded from any of the islands to the windward of Porto Rico. In the other direction, however, it travels down the Isthmus of Panama and the west coast of South America to Peru. The killdeer has several other congeners in America, among which may be noticed Ae. semipalmata, curiously resembling the ordinary ringed plover of the Old World, Ae. hiaticula, except that it has its toes connected by a web at the base; and Ae. nivosa, a bird inhabiting the western parts of both the American continents, which in the opinion of some authors is only a local form of the widely spread Ae. alexandrina or cantiana, best known as Kentish plover, from its discovery near Sandwich towards the end of the 18th century, though it is far more abundant in many other parts of the Old World. The common ringed plover, Ae. hiaticula, has many of the habits of the killdeer, but is much less often found away from the sea-shore, though a few colonies may be found in dry warrens in certain parts of England many miles from the coast, and in Lapland at a still greater distance. In such localities it paves its nest with small stones (whence it is locally known as “Stone hatch”), a habit almost unaccountable unless regarded as an inherited instinct from shingle-haunting ancestors.
KILLDEER, a common American plover, named after its whistling call, the Charadrius vociferus by Linnaeus, and the Aegialitis vocifera by modern birdwatchers. It's about the size of a snipe, mostly sooty-brown on top, but has a bright buff color on its tail feathers, and a white bar on its wings when flying; underneath, it is pure white except for two black bands across its chest. It is one of the largest and most beautiful members of the group often called ringed plovers or ring dotterels, forming the genus Aegialitis of Boie. Mostly wintering in the southern regions or along the coast in northern states, in spring, it spreads across the interior, breeding in freshly plowed fields or open grasslands. The nest is a shallow depression, often surrounded by small pebbles and shell fragments. Here, the female lays four pear-shaped, stone-colored eggs, always positioned with their pointed ends touching each other, as is common for most Limicoline birds. The parents show extreme concern for their young when an intruder approaches. It is the most well-known bird of its family in the United States, where it is less common in the northeast than in the south or west. In Canada, it doesn't go further north than 56° N.; it's not found in Greenland, and rarely in Labrador, but does appear in Newfoundland every spring and fall. In winter, it travels to Bermuda and some of the Antilles, but there's no record of it on any islands east of Puerto Rico. However, it does migrate down the Isthmus of Panama and the west coast of South America to Peru. The killdeer has several other relatives in America, including Ae. semipalmata, which closely resembles the typical ringed plover from the Old World, Ae. hiaticula, except that its toes are webbed at the base; and Ae. nivosa, a bird found in the western parts of both American continents, which some authors consider merely a local variation of the widely distributed Ae. alexandrina or cantiana, best known as the Kentish plover, discovered near Sandwich in the late 18th century, although it is more abundant in many other parts of the Old World. The common ringed plover, Ae. hiaticula, shares many habits with the killdeer but is less frequently found away from the coast, though a few colonies may inhabit dry areas many miles inland in certain parts of England, and in Lapland even further away. In such places, it lines its nest with small stones (hence it is locally known as “Stone hatch”), a behavior that seems inexplicable unless viewed as an inherited instinct from ancestors that nested in shingle habitats.
1 The word dotterel seems properly applicable to a single species only, the Charadrius morinellus of Linnaeus, which, from some of its osteological characters, may be fitly regarded as the type of a distinct genus, Eudromias. Whether any other species agree with it in the peculiarity alluded to is at present uncertain.
1 The term dotterel seems to correctly refer to just one species, the Charadrius morinellus described by Linnaeus. Based on some of its skeletal features, it might be appropriately classified as the type of a separate genus, Eudromias. It is currently unclear if any other species share the unique characteristics mentioned.

KILLIECRANKIE, a pass of Perthshire, Scotland, 3¾ m. N.N.W. of Pitlochry by the Highland railway. Beginning close to Killiecrankie station it extends southwards to the bridge of Garry for nearly 1½ m. through the narrow, extremely beautiful, densely wooded glen in the channel of which flows the Garry. A road constructed by General Wade in 1732 runs up the pass, and between this and the river is the railway, built in 1863. The battle of the 27th of July 1689, between some 3000 Jacobites under Viscount Dundee and the royal force, about 4000 strong, led by General Hugh Mackay, though named from the ravine, was not actually fought in the pass. When Mackay emerged from the gorge he found the Highlanders already in battle array on the high ground on the right bank of the Girnaig, a tributary of the Garry, within half a mile of where the railway station now is. Before he had time to form on the more open table-land, the clansmen charged impetuously with their claymores and swept his troops back into the pass and the Garry. Mackay lost nearly half his force, the Jacobites about 900, including their leader. Urrard House adjoins the spot where Viscount Dundee received his death-wound.
KILLIECRANKIE, a pass in Perthshire, Scotland, 3¾ miles N.N.W. of Pitlochry by the Highland railway. It starts near Killiecrankie station and stretches south to the bridge of Garry for almost 1½ miles through a narrow, stunningly beautiful, densely forested glen where the Garry river flows. A road built by General Wade in 1732 runs through the pass, and between this road and the river is the railway, constructed in 1863. The battle on July 27, 1689, involved about 3,000 Jacobites led by Viscount Dundee and a royal force of around 4,000 commanded by General Hugh Mackay. Though the battle is named after the ravine, it didn't actually take place in the pass. When Mackay came out of the gorge, he found the Highlanders already positioned on the high ground on the right bank of the Girnaig, a tributary of the Garry, less than half a mile from where the railway station is today. Before he could organize his troops on the more open terrain, the clansmen charged fiercely with their claymores and pushed his forces back into the pass and the Garry. Mackay lost nearly half his troops, while the Jacobites lost about 900, including their leader. Urrard House is next to the spot where Viscount Dundee received his fatal wound.

KILLIGREW, SIR HENRY (d. 1603), English diplomatist, belonged to an old Cornish family and became member of parliament for Launceston in 1553. Having lived abroad 796 during the whole or part of Mary’s reign, he returned to England when Elizabeth came to the throne and at once began to serve the new queen as a diplomatist. He was employed on a mission to Germany, and in conducting negotiations in Scotland, where he had several interviews with Mary Queen of Scots. He was knighted in 1591, and after other diplomatic missions in various parts of Europe he died early in 1603. Many of Sir Henry’s letters on public matters are in the Record Office, London, and in the British Museum. His first wife, Catherine (c. 1530-1583), daughter of Sir Anthony Cooke (1504-1576), tutor to Edward VI., was a lady of talent.
KILLIGREW, SIR HENRY (d. 1603), English diplomat, came from an old Cornish family and became a member of parliament for Launceston in 1553. He lived abroad during all or part of Mary’s reign, and returned to England when Elizabeth took the throne, immediately offering his services to the new queen as a diplomat. He was sent on a mission to Germany and worked on negotiations in Scotland, where he met with Mary Queen of Scots several times. He was knighted in 1591, and after completing other diplomatic missions across Europe, he died early in 1603. Many of Sir Henry’s letters on public issues can be found in the Record Office, London, and the British Museum. His first wife, Catherine (c. 1530-1583), the daughter of Sir Anthony Cooke (1504-1576), who was the tutor to Edward VI, was an accomplished woman.
Another celebrated member of this family was Sir Robert Killigrew (c. 1579-1633), who was knighted by James I. in the same year (1603) as his father, Sir William Killigrew. Sir William was an officer in Queen Elizabeth’s household and a member of parliament; he died in November 1622. Sir Robert was a member of all the parliaments between 1603 and his death, but he came more into prominence owing to his alleged connexion with the death of Sir Thomas Overbury. A man of some scientific knowledge, he had been in the habit of supplying powders to Robert Carr, earl of Somerset, but it is not certain that the fatal powder came from the hands of Killigrew. He died early in 1633, leaving five sons, three of whom attained some reputation (see below).
Another well-known member of this family was Sir Robert Killigrew (c. 1579-1633), who was knighted by James I in the same year (1603) as his father, Sir William Killigrew. Sir William served as an officer in Queen Elizabeth’s household and was a member of parliament; he passed away in November 1622. Sir Robert was part of every parliament between 1603 and his death, but he gained more attention due to his alleged connection to the death of Sir Thomas Overbury. A man with some scientific knowledge, he had been supplying powders to Robert Carr, earl of Somerset, but it’s unclear if the deadly powder came from Killigrew. He died early in 1633, leaving behind five sons, three of whom became somewhat well-known (see below).

KILLIGREW, THOMAS (1612-1683), English dramatist and wit, son of Sir Robert Killigrew, was born in Lothbury, London, on the 7th of February 1612. Pepys says that as a boy he satisfied his love of the stage by volunteering at the Red Bull to take the part of a devil, thus seeing the play for nothing. In 1633 he became page to Charles I., and was faithfully attached to the royal house throughout his life. In 1635 he was in France, and has left an account (printed in the European Magazine, 1803) of the exorcizing of an evil spirit from some nuns at Loudun. In 1641 he published two tragi-comedies, The Prisoners and Claracilla, both of which had probably been produced before 1636. In 1647 he followed Prince Charles into exile. His wit, easy morals and accommodating temper recommended him to Charles, who sent him to Venice in 1651 as his representative. Early in the following year he was recalled at the request of the Venetian ambassador in Paris. At the Restoration he became groom of the bedchamber to Charles II., and later chamberlain to the queen. He received in 1660, with Sir William Davenant, a patent to erect a new playhouse, the performances in which were to be independent of the censorship of the master of the revels. This infringement of his prerogative caused a dispute with Sir Henry Herbert, then holder of the office, but Killigrew settled the matter by generous concessions. He acted independently of Davenant, his company being known as the King’s Servants. They played at the Red Bull, until in 1663 he built for them the original Theatre Royal in Drury Lane. Pepys writes in 1664 that Killigrew intended to have four opera seasons of six weeks each during the year, and with this end in view paid several visits to Rome to secure singers and scene decorators. In 1664 his plays were published as Comedies and Tragedies. Written by Thomas Killigrew. They are Claracilla; The Princess, or Love at First Sight; The Parson’s Wedding; The Pilgrim; Cicilia and Clorinda, or Love in Arms; Thomaso, or the Wanderer; and Bellamira, her Dream, or Love of Shadows. The Parson’s Wedding (acted c. 1640, reprinted in the various editions of Dodsley’s Old Plays and in the Ancient British Drama) is an unsavoury play, which displays nevertheless considerable wit, and some of its jokes were appropriated by Congreve. It was revived after the Restoration in 1664 and 1672 or 1673, all the parts being in both cases taken by women. Killigrew succeeded Sir Henry Herbert as master of the revels in 1673. He died at Whitehall on the 19th of March 1683. He was twice married, first to Cecilia Crofts, maid of honour to Queen Henrietta Maria, and secondly to Charlotte de Hesse, by whom he had a son Thomas (1657-1719), who was the author of a successful little piece, Chit-Chat, played at Drury Lane on the 14th of February 1719, with Mrs Oldfield in the part of Florinda.
KILLIGREW, THOMAS (1612-1683), English playwright and witty person, son of Sir Robert Killigrew, was born in Lothbury, London, on February 7, 1612. Pepys notes that as a child he fulfilled his passion for the theater by volunteering at the Red Bull to play the role of a devil, allowing him to watch the play for free. In 1633, he became a page to Charles I and remained loyal to the royal family throughout his life. In 1635, he was in France and left behind an account (published in the European Magazine, 1803) detailing the exorcism of an evil spirit from some nuns at Loudun. In 1641, he published two tragi-comedies, The Prisoners and Claracilla, both of which were likely produced before 1636. In 1647, he followed Prince Charles into exile. His wit, open morals, and easy-going nature made him favorable to Charles, who sent him to Venice in 1651 as his representative. Early the next year, he was recalled at the request of the Venetian ambassador in Paris. When the monarchy was restored, he became groom of the bedchamber to Charles II and later chamberlain to the queen. In 1660, he and Sir William Davenant were granted a patent to establish a new theater that would not be subject to the censorship of the master of the revels. This challenge to his authority led to a dispute with Sir Henry Herbert, who held the office at the time, but Killigrew resolved the issue through generous compromises. He operated independently of Davenant, with his company being known as the King’s Servants. They performed at the Red Bull until 1663 when he built the original Theatre Royal in Drury Lane for them. Pepys wrote in 1664 that Killigrew planned to have four opera seasons lasting six weeks each throughout the year and, to this end, made several trips to Rome to secure singers and set designers. In 1664, his plays were published as Comedies and Tragedies. Written by Thomas Killigrew. They include Claracilla; The Princess, or Love at First Sight; The Parson’s Wedding; The Pilgrim; Cicilia and Clorinda, or Love in Arms; Thomaso, or the Wanderer; and Bellamira, her Dream, or Love of Shadows. The Parson’s Wedding (performed c. 1640, reprinted in various editions of Dodsley’s Old Plays and in the Ancient British Drama) is a controversial play that still shows a lot of wit, and some of its jokes were used by Congreve. It was revived after the Restoration in 1664 and 1672 or 1673, with all the parts played by women in both cases. Killigrew took over from Sir Henry Herbert as master of the revels in 1673. He died at Whitehall on March 19, 1683. He was married twice, first to Cecilia Crofts, maid of honor to Queen Henrietta Maria, and then to Charlotte de Hesse, with whom he had a son, Thomas (1657-1719), who wrote a successful little play, Chit-Chat, performed at Drury Lane on February 14, 1719, with Mrs. Oldfield playing the role of Florinda.
Killigrew enjoyed a greater reputation as a wit than as a dramatist. Sir John Denham said of him:—
Killigrew was known more for his cleverness than for his playwriting. Sir John Denham commented on him:—
Had Cowley ne’er spoke, Killigrew ne’er writ, Had Cowley never spoken, Killigrew never wrote, Combined in one, they’d made a matchless wit. Combined in one, they’d created an unmatched sense of humor. |
Many stories are related of his bold speeches to Charles I. Pepys (Feb. 12, 1668) records that he was said to hold the title of King’s Fool or Jester, with a cap and bells at the expense of the king’s wardrobe, and that he might therefore revile or jeer anybody, even the greatest, without offence.
Many stories are told about his daring speeches to Charles I. Pepys (Feb. 12, 1668) notes that it was said he held the title of King’s Fool or Jester, complete with a cap and bells funded by the king’s wardrobe, which allowed him to mock or insult anyone, even those of the highest status, without causing offense.
His elder brother, Sir William Killigrew (1606-1695), was a court official under Charles I. and Charles II. He attempted to drain the Lincolnshire fens, and was the author of four plays (printed 1665 and 1666) of some merit.
His older brother, Sir William Killigrew (1606-1695), was a court official for Charles I and Charles II. He tried to drain the Lincolnshire fens and wrote four plays (published in 1665 and 1666) that were somewhat notable.
A younger brother, Dr Henry Killigrew (1613-1700), was chaplain and almoner to the duke of York, and master of the Savoy after the Restoration. A juvenile play of his, The Conspiracy, was printed surreptitiously in 1638, and in an authenticated version in 1653 as Pallantus and Eudora. He had two sons, Henry Killigrew (d. 1712), an admiral, and James Killigrew, also a naval officer, who was killed in an encounter with the French in January 1695; and a daughter, Anne (1660-1685), poet and painter, who was maid of honour to the duchess of York, and was the subject of an ode by Dryden, which Samuel Johnson thought the noblest in the language.
A younger brother, Dr Henry Killigrew (1613-1700), was the chaplain and treasurer for the Duke of York, and became the master of the Savoy after the Restoration. A play he wrote when he was young, The Conspiracy, was published secretly in 1638, and later officially released in 1653 as Pallantus and Eudora. He had two sons, Henry Killigrew (d. 1712), an admiral, and James Killigrew, also a naval officer, who was killed during a confrontation with the French in January 1695; and a daughter, Anne (1660-1685), a poet and painter, who served as a maid of honor to the Duchess of York, and was the subject of an ode by Dryden, which Samuel Johnson considered the noblest in the language.
A sister, Elizabeth Killigrew, married Francis Boyle, 1st Viscount Shannon, and became a mistress of Charles II.
A sister, Elizabeth Killigrew, married Francis Boyle, 1st Viscount Shannon, and became a mistress of Charles II.

KILLIN, a village and parish of Perthshire, Scotland, at the south-western extremity of Loch Tay, 4 m. N.E. of Killin Junction on a branch line of the Callander & Oban railway. Pop. of parish (1901), 1423. It is situated near the confluence of the rivers and glens of the Dochart and Lochay, and is a popular tourist centre, having communication by steamer with Kenmore at the other end of the lake, and thence by coach to Aberfeldy, the terminus of a branch of the Highland railway. It has manufactures of tweeds. In a field near the village a stone marks the site of what is known as Fingal’s Grove. An island in the Dochart (which is crossed at Killin by a bridge of five arches) is the ancient burial-place of the clan Macnab. Finlarig Castle, a picturesque mass of ivy-clad ruins, was a stronghold of the Campbells of Glenorchy, and several earls of Breadalbane were buried in ground adjoining it, where the modern mausoleum of the family stands. Three miles up the Lochay, which rises in the hills beyond the forest of Mamlorn and has a course of 15 m., the river forms a graceful cascade. The Dochart, issuing from Loch Dochart, flows for 13 m. in a north-easterly direction and falls into Loch Tay. The ruined castle on an islet in the loch once belonged to the Campbells of Lochawe.
KILLIN, is a village and parish in Perthshire, Scotland, located at the southwestern end of Loch Tay, 4 miles northeast of Killin Junction on a branch line of the Callander & Oban railway. The parish population in 1901 was 1,423. It’s near where the rivers and glens of the Dochart and Lochay meet, making it a popular tourist spot. There’s a steamer connection to Kenmore at the other end of the lake, and from there, you can take a coach to Aberfeldy, which is the terminus of a branch of the Highland railway. The village produces tweeds. In a field near the village, a stone marks where Fingal’s Grove is located. An island in the Dochart, which is crossed at Killin by a five-arch bridge, is the ancient burial site of the clan Macnab. Finlarig Castle, with its picturesque ivy-covered ruins, was a stronghold of the Campbells of Glenorchy, and several earls of Breadalbane were buried in the area next to it, where the family’s modern mausoleum stands. Three miles up the Lochay, which starts in the hills beyond the Mamlorn forest and has a 15-mile course, the river creates a beautiful cascade. The Dochart, which comes from Loch Dochart, flows northeast for 13 miles before it enters Loch Tay. The ruined castle on an islet in the loch once belonged to the Campbells of Lochawe.

KILLIS, a town of N. Syria, in the vilayet of Aleppo, 60 m. N. of Aleppo city. It is situated in an extremely fertile plain, and is completely surrounded with olive groves, the produce of which is reckoned the finest oil of all Syria; and its position on the carriage-road from Aleppo to Aintab and Birejik gives it importance. The population (20,000) consists largely of Circassians, Turkomans and Arabs, the town lying just on the northern rim of the Arab territory. As Killis lies also very near the proposed junction of the Bagdad and the Beirut-Aleppo railways (at Tell Habesh), it is likely to increase in importance.
KILLIS, is a town in northern Syria, in the Aleppo province, located 60 miles north of Aleppo city. It sits in a highly fertile plain and is completely surrounded by olive groves, known for producing the finest oil in all of Syria. Its location on the main road from Aleppo to Aintab and Birejik adds to its significance. The population of around 20,000 is mainly made up of Circassians, Turkomans, and Arabs, with the town lying just at the northern edge of Arab territory. Additionally, since Killis is very close to the proposed junction of the Baghdad and Beirut-Aleppo railways (at Tell Habesh), its importance is likely to grow.

KILLYBEGS, a seaport and market town of county Donegal, Ireland, in the south parliamentary division, on the north coast on Donegal Bay, the terminus of the Donegal railway. Pop. (1901), 607. It derives some importance from its fine land-locked harbour, which, affording accommodation to large vessels, is used as a naval station, and is the centre of an important fishery. There is a large pier for the fishing vessels. The manufacture of carpets occupies a part of the population, employing both male and female labour—the productions being known as Donegal carpets. There are slight remains of a castle and ancient church; and a mineral spring is still used. The town received a charter from James I., and was a parliamentary borough, returning two members, until the Union.
Killybegs, is a seaport and market town in County Donegal, Ireland, located in the southern parliamentary division on the north coast of Donegal Bay, and is the endpoint of the Donegal railway. Population (1901): 607. It holds significance due to its excellent land-locked harbor, which accommodates large vessels, serves as a naval station, and is the hub of an important fishery. There is a large pier for fishing boats. The production of carpets employs part of the population, involving both men and women—the products are known as Donegal carpets. There are some remnants of a castle and an ancient church, and a mineral spring is still in use. The town was granted a charter by James I and was a parliamentary borough, sending two representatives, until the Union.

KILLYLEAGH, a small seaport and market town of county Down, Ireland, in the east parliamentary division, on the western shore of Strangford Lough. Pop. (1901), 1410. Linen manufacture is the principal industry, and agricultural produce is exported. Killyleagh was an important stronghold in early times, and the modern castle preserves the towers of the old building. Sir John de Courcy erected this among many other fortresses in the neighbourhood; it was besieged by Shane O’Neill (1567), destroyed by Monk (1648), and subsequently rebuilt. The town was incorporated by James I., and returned two members to the Irish parliament.
KILLYLEAGH, is a small seaport and market town in County Down, Ireland, located in the eastern parliamentary division on the western shore of Strangford Lough. Population (1901), 1410. The main industry is linen manufacturing, and agricultural goods are exported. Killyleagh was a significant stronghold in ancient times, and the modern castle still features the towers of the original structure. Sir John de Courcy built this castle along with several other forts in the area; it was besieged by Shane O’Neill in 1567, destroyed by Monk in 1648, and later rebuilt. The town was incorporated by James I and sent two representatives to the Irish parliament.

KILMAINE, CHARLES EDWARD (1751-1799), French general, was born at Dublin on the 19th of October 1751. At the age of eleven he went with his father, whose surname was Jennings, to France, where he changed his name to Kilmaine, after a village in Mayo. He entered the French army as an officer in a dragoon regiment in 1774, and afterwards served as a volunteer in the Navy (1778), during which period he was engaged in the fighting in Senegal. From 1780 to 1783 he took part in the War of American Independence under Rochambeau, rejoining the army on his return to France. In 1791, as a retired captain, he took the civic oath and was recalled to active service, becoming lieutenant-colonel in 1792, and colonel, brigadier-general, and lieutenant-general in 1793. In this last capacity he distinguished himself in the wars on the northern and eastern frontiers. But he became an object of suspicion on account of his foreign birth and his relations with England. He was suspended on the 4th of August 1793, and was not recalled to active service till 1795. He then took part in the Italian campaigns of 1796 and 1797, and was made commandant of Lombardy. He afterwards received the command of the cavalry in Bonaparte’s “army of England,” of which, during the absence of Desaix, he was temporarily commander-in-chief (1798). He died on the 15th of December 1799.
KILMAINE, CHARLES EDWARD (1751-1799), was a French general born in Dublin on October 19, 1751. At eleven, he moved to France with his father, whose last name was Jennings, and changed his name to Kilmaine, named after a village in Mayo. He joined the French army as an officer in a dragoon regiment in 1774, and later served as a volunteer in the Navy in 1778, during which he fought in Senegal. From 1780 to 1783, he participated in the War of American Independence under Rochambeau before rejoining the army upon his return to France. In 1791, as a retired captain, he took the civic oath and was called back to active duty, becoming lieutenant-colonel in 1792, and rising to colonel, brigadier-general, and lieutenant-general in 1793. In this role, he distinguished himself in the wars on the northern and eastern frontiers. However, he became a target of suspicion due to his foreign birth and connections to England. He was suspended on August 4, 1793, and wasn’t recalled to active service until 1795. He then participated in the Italian campaigns of 1796 and 1797, later becoming the commander of Lombardy. He subsequently took command of the cavalry in Bonaparte’s “army of England,” where he temporarily served as commander-in-chief during Desaix's absence in 1798. He died on December 15, 1799.
See J. G. Alger, Englishmen in the French Revolution (1889); Eugène Fieffé, Histoire des troupes étrangères au service de France (1854); Etienne Charavay, Correspondance de Carnot, tome iii.
See J. G. Alger, Englishmen in the French Revolution (1889); Eugène Fieffé, Histoire des troupes étrangères au service de France (1854); Etienne Charavay, Correspondance de Carnot, vol. iii.

KILMALLOCK, a market town of county Limerick, Ireland, in the east parliamentary division, 124¼ m. S.W. of Dublin by the Great Southern & Western main line. Pop. (1901), 1206. It commands a natural route (now followed by the railway) through the hills to the south and south-west, and is a site of great historical interest. It received a charter in the reign of Edward III., at which time it was walled and fortified, and entered by four gates, two of which remain. It was a military post of importance in Elizabeth’s reign, but its fortifications were for the most part demolished by order of Cromwell. Two castellated mansions are still to be seen. The church of St Peter and St Paul belonged to a former abbey, and has a tower at the north-west corner which is a converted round tower. The Dominican Abbey, of the 13th century, has Early English remains of great beauty and a tomb to Edmund, the last of the White Knights, a branch of the family of Desmond intimately connected with Kilmallock, who received their title from Edward III. at the battle of Halidon Hill. The foundation of Kilmallock, however, is attributed to the Geraldines, who had several towns in this vicinity. Eight miles from the town is Lough Gur, near which are numerous stone circles and other remains. Kilmallock returned two members to the Irish parliament.
KILMALLOCK, is a market town in County Limerick, Ireland, located in the eastern parliamentary division, 124¼ miles southwest of Dublin by the Great Southern & Western main line. Population (1901): 1206. It has a natural route (now used by the railway) through the hills to the south and southwest, and is a site of significant historical interest. It received a charter during the reign of Edward III, at which point it was walled and fortified, and entered through four gates, two of which still exist. It was an important military post during Elizabeth's reign, but most of its fortifications were destroyed by Cromwell's orders. Two fortified mansions can still be seen today. The Church of St. Peter and St. Paul was part of a former abbey and features a tower at the northwest corner that is a converted round tower. The Dominican Abbey, dating back to the 13th century, has beautiful Early English remains and a tomb of Edmund, the last of the White Knights, a branch of the Desmond family closely linked to Kilmallock, who received their title from Edward III at the battle of Halidon Hill. However, the foundation of Kilmallock is credited to the Geraldines, who had several towns in the area. Eight miles from the town is Lough Gur, where many stone circles and other remains can be found. Kilmallock sent two representatives to the Irish parliament.

KILMARNOCK, a municipal and police burgh of Ayrshire, Scotland, on Kilmarnock Water, a tributary of the Irvine, 24 m. S.W. of Glasgow by the Glasgow & South-Western railway. Pop. (1901), 35,091. Among the chief buildings are the town hall, court-house, corn-exchange (with the Albert Tower, 110 ft. high), observatory, academy, corporation art gallery, institute (containing a free library and a museum), Kay schools, School of Science and Art, Athenaeum, theatre, infirmary, Agricultural Hall, and Philosophical Institution. The grounds of Kilmarnock House, presented to the town in 1893, were laid out as a public park. In Kay Park (48¾ acres), purchased from the duke of Portland for £9000, stands the Burns Memorial, consisting of two storeys and a tower, and containing a museum in which have been placed many important MSS. of the poet and the McKie library of Burns’s books. The marble statue of the poet, by W. G. Stevenson, stands on a terrace on the southern face. A Reformers’ monument was unveiled in Kay Park in 1885. Kilmarnock rose into importance in the 17th century by its production of striped woollen “Kilmarnock cowls” and broad blue bonnets, and afterwards acquired a great name for its Brussels, Turkey and Scottish carpets. Tweeds, blankets, shawls, tartans, lace curtains, cottons and winceys are also produced. The boot and shoe trade is prosperous, and there are extensive engineering and hydraulic machinery works. But the iron industry is prominent, the town being situated in the midst of a rich mineral region. Here, too, are the workshops of the Glasgow & South-Western railway company. Kilmarnock is famous for its dairy produce, and every October holds the largest cheese-show in Scotland. The neighbourhood abounds in freestone and coal. The burgh, which is governed by a provost and council, unites with Dumbarton, Port Glasgow, Renfrew and Rutherglen in returning one member to parliament. Alexander Smith, the poet (1830-1867), whose father was a lace-pattern designer, and Sir James Shaw (1764-1843), lord mayor of London in 1806, to whom a statue was erected in the town in 1848, were natives of Kilmarnock. It dates from the 15th century, and in 1591 was made a burgh of barony under the Boyds, the ruling house of the district. The last Boyd who bore the title of Lord Kilmarnock was beheaded on Tower Hill, London, in 1746, for his share in the Jacobite rising. The first edition of Robert Burns’s poems was published here in 1786.
Kilmarnock, is a municipal and police burgh in Ayrshire, Scotland, located on Kilmarnock Water, a tributary of the River Irvine, 24 miles southwest of Glasgow by the Glasgow & South-Western railway. The population in 1901 was 35,091. Some of the main buildings include the town hall, court house, corn exchange (which features the 110 ft. tall Albert Tower), observatory, academy, art gallery, institute (that includes a free library and museum), Kay schools, School of Science and Art, Athenaeum, theatre, infirmary, Agricultural Hall, and Philosophical Institution. The grounds of Kilmarnock House, given to the town in 1893, were developed into a public park. In Kay Park (48¾ acres), purchased from the Duke of Portland for £9000, stands the Burns Memorial, which has two stories and a tower, hosting a museum that contains many significant manuscripts of the poet and the McKie library of Burns’s books. A marble statue of the poet, created by W. G. Stevenson, is positioned on a terrace facing south. A Reformers’ monument was unveiled in Kay Park in 1885. Kilmarnock gained significance in the 17th century with its production of striped woollen “Kilmarnock cowls” and broad blue bonnets, later becoming well-known for its Brussels, Turkey, and Scottish carpets. The town also produces tweeds, blankets, shawls, tartans, lace curtains, cottons, and winceys. The boot and shoe industry thrives, and there are extensive engineering and hydraulic machinery works. The iron industry is especially prominent, with the town located in a rich mineral area. The workshops of the Glasgow & South-Western railway company are also found here. Kilmarnock is renowned for its dairy products, hosting the largest cheese show in Scotland every October. The area is rich in freestone and coal. The burgh is governed by a provost and council, and it joins with Dumbarton, Port Glasgow, Renfrew, and Rutherglen to elect one member to parliament. Alexander Smith, the poet (1830-1867), whose father was a lace-pattern designer, and Sir James Shaw (1764-1843), who was the lord mayor of London in 1806 and has a statue erected in town in 1848, were both born in Kilmarnock. The town's history dates back to the 15th century, and it was granted burgh of barony status in 1591 under the Boyds, the ruling family of the area. The last Boyd to hold the title of Lord Kilmarnock was executed on Tower Hill, London, in 1746 due to his participation in the Jacobite rising. The first edition of Robert Burns’s poems was published here in 1786.

KILMAURS, a town in the Cunningham division of Ayrshire, Scotland, on the Carmel, 21½ m. S. by W. of Glasgow by the Glasgow & South-Western railway. Pop. (1901), 1803. Once noted for its cutlery, the chief industries now are shoe and bonnet factories, and there are iron and coal mines in the neighbourhood. The parish church dates from 1170, and was dedicated either to the Virgin or to a Scottish saint of the 9th century called Maure. It was enlarged in 1403 and in great part rebuilt in 1888. Adjoining it is the burial-place of the earls of Glencairn, the leading personages in the district during several centuries, some of whom bore the style of Lord Kilmaurs. Their family name was Cunningham, adopted probably from the manor which they acquired in the 12th century. The town was made a burgh of barony in 1527 by the earl of that date. Burns’s patron, the thirteenth earl, on whose death the poet wrote his touching “Lament,” sold the Kllmaurs estate in 1786 to the marchioness of Titchfield.
KILMAURS, is a town in the Cunningham area of Ayrshire, Scotland, located on the Carmel River, 21½ miles south-west of Glasgow by the Glasgow & South-Western railway. Population (1901): 1,803. Once famous for its cutlery, the main industries today are shoe and bonnet manufacturing, and there are iron and coal mines nearby. The parish church, which was built in 1170, was dedicated either to the Virgin Mary or a Scottish saint from the 9th century named Maure. It was expanded in 1403 and mostly rebuilt in 1888. Next to it is the burial site of the earls of Glencairn, prominent figures in the area for many centuries, some of whom held the title Lord Kilmaurs. Their family name was Cunningham, likely taken from the manor they acquired in the 12th century. The town was granted status as a burgh of barony in 1527 by the earl at the time. Burns’s patron, the thirteenth earl, who inspired the poet's heartfelt “Lament” upon his death, sold the Kilmaurs estate in 1786 to the marchioness of Titchfield.

KILN (O.E. cylene, from the Lat. culina, a kitchen, cooking-stove), a place for burning, baking or drying. Kilns may be divided into two classes—those in which the materials come into actual contact with the flames, and those in which the furnace is beneath or surrounding the oven. Lime-kilns are of the first class, and brick-kilns, pottery-kilns, &c., of the second, which also includes places for merely drying materials, such as hop-kilns, usually called “oasts” or “oast-houses.”
KILN (O.E. cylene, from the Latin culina, meaning kitchen or cooking stove), is a place for burning, baking, or drying. Kilns can be divided into two categories—those where the materials come into direct contact with the flames, and those where the furnace is underneath or around the oven. Lime kilns fall into the first category, while brick kilns, pottery kilns, etc., belong to the second category, which also includes locations for simply drying materials, like hop kilns, usually referred to as “oasts” or “oast houses.”

KILPATRICK, NEW, or EAST, also called Bearsden, a town of Dumbartonshire, Scotland, 5½ m. N.W. of Glasgow by road, with a station on the North British railway company’s branch line from Glasgow to Milngavie. Pop. (1901), 2705. The town is largely inhabited by business men from Glasgow. The public buildings include the Shaw convalescent home, Buchanan, Retreat, house of refuge for girls, library, and St Peter’s College, a fine structure, presented to the Roman Catholic Church in 1892 by the archbishop of Glasgow. There is some coal-mining, and lime is manufactured. Remains of the Wall of Antoninus are close to the town. At Garscube and Garscadden, both within 1½ m. of New Kilpatrick, are extensive iron-works, and at the former place coal is mined and stone quarried.
KILPATRICK, NEW, or EAST, also known as Bearsden, is a town in Dumbartonshire, Scotland, located 5½ miles northwest of Glasgow by road, with a station on the North British Railway Company's branch line from Glasgow to Milngavie. Population (1901) was 2,705. The town is mainly populated by business people from Glasgow. The public buildings include the Shaw Convalescent Home, Buchanan Retreat, a house of refuge for girls, a library, and St Peter’s College, a beautiful building gifted to the Roman Catholic Church in 1892 by the Archbishop of Glasgow. There is some coal mining and lime production. Remnants of the Wall of Antoninus are near the town. In Garscube and Garscadden, both within 1½ miles of New Kilpatrick, there are large iron works, and at the former location, coal is mined and stone is quarried.

KILPATRICK, OLD, a town of Dumbartonshire, Scotland, on the right bank of the Clyde, 10½ m. N.W. of Glasgow by rail, with stations on the North British and Caledonian railways. Pop. (1901), 1533. It is traditionally the birthplace of St Patrick, 798 whose father is said to have acted there as a Roman magistrate. Roman remains occur in the district, and the Wall of Antoninus ran through the parish. To the north, occupying an area of about 6 m. from east to west and 5 m. from north to south run the Kilpatrick Hills, of which the highest points are Duncomb and Fynloch Hill (each 1313 ft.).
KILPATRICK, OLD, a town in Dumbartonshire, Scotland, located on the right bank of the Clyde, 10½ miles northwest of Glasgow by train, with stations on the North British and Caledonian railways. Population (1901), 1,533. It is traditionally known as the birthplace of St. Patrick, 798 whose father is believed to have served as a Roman magistrate there. Roman remains can be found in the area, and the Antonine Wall ran through the parish. To the north, there's the Kilpatrick Hills, which cover an area of about 6 miles from east to west and 5 miles from north to south, with the highest points being Duncomb and Fynloch Hill (each at 1,313 ft.).

KILRUSH, a seaport and watering-place of county Clare, Ireland, in the west parliamentary division, on the north shore of the Shannon estuary 45 m. below Limerick. Pop. of urban district (1901), 4179. It is the terminus of a branch of the West Clare railway. The only seaport of importance in the county, it has a considerable export trade in peat fuel, extensive fisheries, and flagstone quarries; while general fairs, horse fairs and annual agricultural shows are held. The inner harbour admits only small vessels, but there is a good pier a mile south of the town. Off the harbour lies Scattery Island (Inis Cathaigh), where St Senan (d. 544) founded a monastery. There are the remains of his oratory and house and of seven rude churches or chapels, together with a round tower and a holy well still in repute. The island also received the epithet of Holy, and was a favourite burial-ground until modern times.
KILRUSH, is a seaport and resort in County Clare, Ireland, located in the west parliamentary division on the north shore of the Shannon estuary, 45 miles below Limerick. The population of the urban district in 1901 was 4,179. It serves as the terminus for a branch of the West Clare railway. Being the only significant seaport in the county, it has a substantial export trade in peat fuel, extensive fisheries, and flagstone quarries. General fairs, horse fairs, and annual agricultural shows are also held here. The inner harbor only accommodates small vessels, but there is a good pier located a mile south of the town. Off the harbor lies Scattery Island (Inis Cathaigh), where St. Senan (d. 544) established a monastery. You can find the remains of his oratory and house, along with seven simple churches or chapels, a round tower, and a holy well that is still venerated. The island was also known as Holy and was a popular burial ground until modern times.

KILSYTH, a police burgh of Stirlingshire, Scotland, on the Kelvin, 13 m. N.N.E. of Glasgow by the North British railway, and close to the Forth and Clyde canal. Pop. (1901), 7292. The principal buildings are the town and public halls, and the academy. The chief industries are coal-mining and iron-works; there are also manufactures of paper and cotton, besides quarrying of whinstone and sandstone. There are considerable remains of the Wall of Antoninus south of the town, and to the north the ruins of the old castle. Kilsyth dates from the middle of the 17th century and became a burgh of barony in 1826. It was the scene of Montrose’s defeat of the Covenanters on the 15th of August 1645. The town was the centre of remarkable religious revivals in 1742-3 and 1839, the latter conducted by William Chalmers Burns (1815-1868), the missionary to China.
KILSYTH, is a police burgh in Stirlingshire, Scotland, located on the Kelvin River, 13 miles N.N.E. of Glasgow by the North British railway, and near the Forth and Clyde canal. Population (1901): 7,292. The main buildings are the town hall, public halls, and the academy. The primary industries are coal mining and ironworks; there are also manufacturing of paper and cotton, in addition to quarrying of whinstone and sandstone. Significant remains of the Wall of Antoninus can be found south of the town, and to the north lie the ruins of the old castle. Kilsyth originated in the mid-17th century and became a burgh of barony in 1826. It was where Montrose defeated the Covenanters on August 15, 1645. The town was the center of notable religious revivals in 1742-3 and 1839, the latter led by William Chalmers Burns (1815-1868), the missionary to China.

KILT, properly the short loose skirt or petticoat, reaching to the knees and usually made of tartan, forming part of the dress of a Scottish Highlander (see Costume). The word means that which is “girded or tucked up,” and is apparently of Scandinavian origin, cf. Danish kilte, to tuck up. The early kilt was not a separate garment but was merely the lower part of the plaid, in which the Highlander wrapped himself, hanging down in folds below the belt.
Kilt, essentially a short, loose skirt or petticoat that goes down to the knees and is usually made of tartan, is part of the traditional outfit of a Scottish Highlander (see Costume). The term refers to something that is “girded or tucked up,” and it appears to come from Scandinavian origins, such as the Danish word kilte, meaning to tuck up. The early kilt wasn’t a separate item of clothing but rather just the lower section of the plaid that the Highlander wrapped around himself, hanging down in folds below the belt.

KILWA (Quiloa), a seaport of German East Africa, about 200 m. S. of Zanzibar. There are two Kilwas, one on the mainland—Kilwa Kivinje; the other, the ancient city, on an island—Kilwa Kisiwani. Kilwa Kivinje, on the northern side of Kilwa Bay, is regularly laid out, the houses in the European quarter being large and substantial. The government house and barracks are fortified and are surrounded by fine public gardens. The adjacent country is fertile and thickly populated, and the trade of the port is considerable. Much of it is in the hands of Banyans. Kilwa is a starting-point for caravans to Lake Nyasa. Pop. about 5000. Most of the inhabitants are Swahili.
KILWA (Quiloa) is a seaport in German East Africa, located about 200 miles south of Zanzibar. There are two Kilwas: one on the mainland, known as Kilwa Kivinje, and the other, the ancient city, on an island called Kilwa Kisiwani. Kilwa Kivinje, located on the northern side of Kilwa Bay, is well-organized, with large and sturdy houses in the European quarter. The government house and barracks are fortified and surrounded by beautiful public gardens. The surrounding area is fertile and densely populated, and the port has significant trade activity, mainly managed by Banyans. Kilwa serves as a starting point for caravans heading to Lake Nyasa. The population is around 5,000, and most of the residents are Swahili.
Kilwa Kisiwani, 18 m. to the south of the modern town, possesses a deep harbour sheltered from all winds by projecting coral reefs. The island on which it is built is separated from the mainland by a shallow and narrow channel. The ruins of the city include massive walls and bastions, remains of a palace and of two large mosques, of which the domed roofs are in fair preservation, besides several Arab forts. The new quarter contains a customs house and a few Arab buildings. Pop. about 600. On the island of Songa Manara, at the southern end of Kilwa Bay, hidden in dense vegetation, are the ruins of another city, unknown to history. Fragments of palaces and mosques in carved limestone exist, and on the beach are the remains of a lighthouse. Chinese coins and pieces of porcelain have been found on the sea-shore, washed up from the reefs.
Kilwa Kisiwani, 18 miles south of the modern town, has a deep harbor that is protected from all winds by protruding coral reefs. The island it's built on is separated from the mainland by a shallow, narrow channel. The ruins of the city feature massive walls and bastions, the remains of a palace, and two large mosques, which have domed roofs that are in fairly good condition, as well as several Arab forts. The new area includes a customs house and a few Arab buildings. Its population is about 600. On the island of Songa Manara, at the southern end of Kilwa Bay, hidden in thick vegetation, are the ruins of another city that is unknown to history. There are remnants of palaces and mosques made of carved limestone, and on the beach, you can find the remains of a lighthouse. Chinese coins and pieces of porcelain have been discovered on the shoreline, washed up from the reefs.
The sultanate of Kilwa is reputed to have been founded about A.D. 975 by Ali ibn Ḥasan, a Persian prince from Shiraz, upon the site of the ancient Greek colony of Rhapta. The new state, at first confined to the town of Kilwa, extended its influence along the coast from Zanzibar to Sofala, and the city came to be regarded as the capital of the Zenj “empire” (see Zanzibar: “Sultanate”). An Arab chronicle gives a list of over forty sovereigns who reigned at Kilwa in a period of five hundred years (cf. A. M. H. J. Stokvis, Manuel d’histoire, Leiden, 1888, i. 558). Pedro Alvares Cabral, the Portuguese navigator, was the first European to visit it. His fleet, on its way to India, anchored in Kilwa Bay in 1500. Kilwa was then a large and wealthy city, possessing, it is stated, three hundred mosques. In 1502 Kilwa submitted to Vasco da Gama, but the sultan neglecting to pay the tribute imposed upon him, the city in 1505 was occupied by the Portuguese. They built a fort there; the first erected by them on the east coast of Africa. Fighting ensued between the Arabs and the Portuguese, the city was destroyed; and in 1512 the Portuguese, whose ranks had been decimated by fever, temporarily abandoned the place. Subsequently Kilwa became one of the chief centres of the slave trade. Towards the end of the 17th century it fell under the dominion of the imams of Muscat, and on the separation in 1856 of their Arabian and African possessions became subject to the sultan of Zanzibar. With the rest of the southern part of the sultan’s continental dominions Kilwa was acquired by Germany in 1890 (see Africa, § 5; and German East Africa).
The sultanate of Kilwa is believed to have been founded around AD 975 by Ali ibn Ḥasan, a Persian prince from Shiraz, at the site of the ancient Greek colony of Rhapta. Initially, the new state was limited to the town of Kilwa but eventually extended its influence along the coast from Zanzibar to Sofala, and the city became known as the capital of the Zenj “empire” (see Zanzibar: “Sultanate”). An Arab chronicle lists over forty rulers who reigned in Kilwa over five hundred years (cf. A. M. H. J. Stokvis, Manuel d’histoire, Leiden, 1888, i. 558). Pedro Alvares Cabral, the Portuguese navigator, was the first European to visit Kilwa. His fleet stopped in Kilwa Bay in 1500 while on its way to India. At that time, Kilwa was a large and wealthy city with reportedly three hundred mosques. In 1502, Kilwa surrendered to Vasco da Gama, but when the sultan failed to pay the required tribute, the Portuguese occupied the city in 1505. They built a fort there, which was the first one they erected on the east coast of Africa. Conflict broke out between the Arabs and the Portuguese, leading to the city's destruction; by 1512, the Portuguese, weakened by fever, temporarily left the area. Later, Kilwa became a major center for the slave trade. By the late 17th century, it came under the control of the imams of Muscat, and after they separated their Arabian and African territories in 1856, it became subject to the sultan of Zanzibar. In 1890, along with the rest of the southern part of the sultan’s territorial possessions, Kilwa was acquired by Germany (see Africa, § 5; and German East Africa).

KILWARDBY, ROBERT (d. 1279), archbishop of Canterbury and cardinal, studied at the university of Paris, where he soon became famous as a teacher of grammar and logic. Afterwards joining the order of St Dominic and turning his attention to theology, he was chosen provincial prior of his order in England in 1261, and in October 1272 Pope Gregory X. terminated a dispute over the vacant archbishopric of Canterbury by appointing Kilwardby. Although the new archbishop crowned Edward I. and his queen Eleanor in August 1274, he took little part in business of state, but was energetic in discharging the spiritual duties of his office. He was charitable to the poor, and showed liberality to the Dominicans. In 1278 Pope Nicholas III. made him cardinal-bishop of Porto and Santa Rufina; he resigned his archbishopric and left England, carrying with him the registers and other valuable property belonging to the see of Canterbury. He died in Italy on the 11th of September 1279. Kilwardby was the first member of a mendicant order to attain a high position in the English Church. Among his numerous writings, which became very popular among students, are De ortu scientiarum, De tempore, De Universali, and some commentaries on Aristotle.
KILWARDBY, ROBERT (d. 1279), archbishop of Canterbury and cardinal, studied at the University of Paris, where he quickly gained recognition as a teacher of grammar and logic. He later joined the Order of St. Dominic and shifted his focus to theology, being appointed provincial prior of his order in England in 1261. In October 1272, Pope Gregory X resolved a dispute over the vacant archbishopric of Canterbury by appointing Kilwardby. Although the new archbishop crowned Edward I and his queen Eleanor in August 1274, he took a limited role in state affairs but actively fulfilled the spiritual responsibilities of his position. He was generous to the poor and showed support for the Dominicans. In 1278, Pope Nicholas III made him cardinal-bishop of Porto and Santa Rufina; he resigned from his archbishopric and left England, taking with him the registers and other valuable items belonging to the see of Canterbury. He died in Italy on September 11, 1279. Kilwardby was the first member of a mendicant order to reach a high position in the English Church. Among his many writings, which became quite popular among students, are De ortu scientiarum, De tempore, De Universali, and several commentaries on Aristotle.
See N. Trevet, Annales sex regum Angliae, edited by T. Hog (London, 1845); W. F. Hook, Lives of the Archbishops of Canterbury, vol. iii. (London, 1860-1876); J. Quétif and J. Échard, Scriptores ordinis Predicatorum (Paris, 1719-1721).
See N. Trevet, Annales sex regum Angliae, edited by T. Hog (London, 1845); W. F. Hook, Lives of the Archbishops of Canterbury, vol. iii. (London, 1860-1876); J. Quétif and J. Échard, Scriptores ordinis Predicatorum (Paris, 1719-1721).

KILWINNING, a municipal and police burgh of Ayrshire, Scotland, on the right bank of the Garnock, 24 m. S.W. of Glasgow by the Caledonian railway, and 26¾ m. by the Glasgow & South-Western railway. Pop. (1901), 4440. The chief buildings include the public library, the Masonic hall and the district hospital. The centre of interest, however, is the ruined abbey, originally one of the richest in Scotland. Founded about 1140 by Hugh de Morville, lord of Cunninghame, for Tyronensian monks of the Benedictine order, it was dedicated to St Winnin, who lived on the spot in the 8th century and has given his name to the town. This beautiful specimen of Early English architecture was partly destroyed in 1561, and its lands were granted to the earl of Eglinton and others. Kilwinning is the traditional birthplace of Scottish freemasonry, the lodge, believed to have been founded by the foreign architects and masons who came to build the abbey, being regarded as the mother lodge in Scotland. The royal company of archers of Kilwinning—dating, it is said, as far back as 1488—meet every July to shoot at the popinjay. The industry in weaving shawls and lighter fabrics has died out; and the large iron, coal and fire-clay works at Eglinton, and worsted spinning, employ most of the inhabitants. About a mile from Kilwinning is Eglinton Castle, the seat of the earls of Eglinton, built in 1798 in the English castellated style.
KILWINNING, a town and police burgh in Ayrshire, Scotland, on the right bank of the Garnock, 24 miles southwest of Glasgow by the Caledonian railway, and 26¾ miles by the Glasgow & South-Western railway. Population (1901), 4,440. The main buildings include the public library, the Masonic hall, and the district hospital. However, the main point of interest is the ruined abbey, once one of the wealthiest in Scotland. Founded around 1140 by Hugh de Morville, lord of Cunninghame, for Tyronensian monks of the Benedictine order, it was dedicated to St. Winnin, who lived in the area in the 8th century and has given his name to the town. This beautiful example of Early English architecture was partially destroyed in 1561, and its lands were given to the earl of Eglinton and others. Kilwinning is known as the traditional birthplace of Scottish freemasonry, with the lodge, believed to have been started by the foreign architects and masons who came to build the abbey, regarded as the mother lodge in Scotland. The royal company of archers of Kilwinning—dating, it is said, back to 1488—meet every July to shoot at the popinjay. The industry of weaving shawls and lighter fabrics has faded; and the large iron, coal, and fire-clay works at Eglinton, along with worsted spinning, employ most of the local residents. About a mile from Kilwinning is Eglinton Castle, the residence of the earls of Eglinton, built in 1798 in the English castellated style.

KIMBERLEY, JOHN WODEHOUSE, 1st Earl of (1826-1902), English statesman, was born on the 7th of January 1826, being the eldest son of the Hon. Henry Wodehouse and grandson of the 2nd Baron Wodehouse (the barony dating from 1797), whom he succeeded in 1846. He was educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, where he took a first-class degree in 799 classics in 1847; in the same year married Lady Florence Fitzgibbon (d. 1895), daughter of the last earl of Clare. He was by inheritance a Liberal in politics, and in 1852-1856 and 1859-1861 he was under secretary of state for foreign affairs in Lord Aberdeen’s and Lord Palmerston’s ministries. In the interval (1856-1858) he had been envoy-extraordinary to Russia; and in 1863 he was sent on a special mission to Copenhagen on the forlorn hope of finding a peaceful solution of the Schleswig-Holstein question. The mission was a failure, but probably nothing else was possible. In 1864 he became under secretary for India, but towards the end of the year was made Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland. In that capacity he had to grapple with the first manifestations of Fenianism, and in recognition of his vigour and success he was created (1866) earl of Kimberley. In July 1866 he vacated his office with the fall of Lord Russell’s ministry, but in 1868 he became Lord Privy Seal in Mr Gladstone’s cabinet, and in July 1870 was transferred from that post to be secretary of state for the colonies. It was the moment of the great diamond discoveries in South Africa, and the new town of Kimberley was named after the colonial secretary of the day. After an interval of opposition from 1874 to 1880, Lord Kimberley returned to the Colonial Office in Mr Gladstone’s next ministry; but at the end of 1882 he exchanged this office first for that of chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster and then for the secretaryship of state for India, a post he retained during the remainder of Mr Gladstone’s tenure of power (1882-1886, 1892-1894), though in 1892-1894 he combined with it that of the lord presidency of the council. In Lord Rosebery’s cabinet (1894-1895) he was foreign secretary. Lord Kimberley was an admirable departmental chief, but it is difficult to associate his own personality with any ministerial act during his occupation of all these posts. He was at the colonial office when responsible government was granted to Cape Colony, when British Columbia was added to the Dominion of Canada, and during the Boer War of 1880-81, with its conclusion at Majuba; and he was foreign secretary when the misunderstanding arose with Germany over the proposed lease of territory from the Congo Free State for the Cape to Cairo route. He was essentially a loyal Gladstonian party man. His moderation, common sense, and patriotism had their influence, nevertheless, on his colleagues. As leader of the Liberal party in the House of Lords he acted with undeviating dignity; and in opposition he was a courteous antagonist and a critic of weight and experience. He took considerable interest in education, and after being for many years a member of the senate of London University, he became its chancellor in 1899. He died in London on the 8th of April 1902, being succeeded in the earldom by his eldest and only surviving son, Lord Wodehouse (b. 1848).
KIMBERLEY, JOHN WODEHOUSE, 1st Earl of (1826-1902), English statesman, was born on January 7, 1826, as the eldest son of the Hon. Henry Wodehouse and the grandson of the 2nd Baron Wodehouse (the barony dating from 1797), whom he succeeded in 1846. He was educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, where he earned a first-class degree in 799 classics in 1847; that same year, he married Lady Florence Fitzgibbon (d. 1895), daughter of the last earl of Clare. He was a Liberal by inheritance, and he served as under secretary of state for foreign affairs from 1852 to 1856 and again from 1859 to 1861 in Lord Aberdeen’s and Lord Palmerston’s ministries. In the time between (1856-1858), he was envoy-extraordinary to Russia; in 1863, he was sent on a special mission to Copenhagen in a futile attempt to find a peaceful solution to the Schleswig-Holstein question. The mission failed, but likely there was no other outcome possible. In 1864, he became under secretary for India, but towards the end of the year, he was appointed Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland. In this role, he faced the initial signs of Fenianism, and in recognition of his energy and success, he was made earl of Kimberley in 1866. In July 1866, he left his office with the fall of Lord Russell’s ministry, but in 1868, he became Lord Privy Seal in Mr. Gladstone’s cabinet, and in July 1870, he transitioned from that position to be secretary of state for the colonies. This was during the time of significant diamond discoveries in South Africa, and the new town of Kimberley was named after the colonial secretary of the day. After a period in opposition from 1874 to 1880, Lord Kimberley returned to the Colonial Office in Mr. Gladstone’s next ministry; however, at the end of 1882, he traded this role first for chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster and then for secretary of state for India, a position he held for the rest of Mr. Gladstone’s time in power (1882-1886, 1892-1894), although from 1892 to 1894, he combined it with the duty of lord president of the council. In Lord Rosebery’s cabinet (1894-1895), he served as foreign secretary. Lord Kimberley was an excellent departmental head, but it's hard to connect his personality with any specific ministerial action during his time in these various positions. He was at the colonial office when responsible government was granted to Cape Colony, when British Columbia joined the Dominion of Canada, and during the Boer War of 1880-81, which ended at Majuba; he was foreign secretary when tensions arose with Germany over the proposed lease of territory from the Congo Free State for the Cape to Cairo route. He was fundamentally a loyal Gladstonian party member. His moderation, common sense, and patriotism did have an impact on his colleagues. As the leader of the Liberal party in the House of Lords, he conducted himself with unwavering dignity; in opposition, he was a polite opponent and a critic of significance and experience. He was deeply interested in education, and after many years on the senate of London University, he became its chancellor in 1899. He died in London on April 8, 1902, and was succeeded in the earldom by his eldest and only surviving son, Lord Wodehouse (b. 1848).

KIMBERLEY, a town of the Cape province, South Africa, the centre of the Griqualand West diamond industry, 647 m. N.E. of Cape Town and 310 m. S.W. of Johannesburg by rail. Pop. (1904), 34,331, of whom 13,556 were whites. The town is built on the bare veld midway between the Modder and Vaal Rivers and is 4012 ft. above the sea. Having grown out of camps formed round the diamond mines, its plan is very irregular and in striking contrast with the rectangular outline common to South African towns. Grouped round market square are the law courts, with a fine clock tower, the post and telegraph offices and the town-hall. The public library and the hospital are in Du Toits Pan Road. In the district of Newton, laid out during the siege of 1899-1900, a monument to those who fell during the operations has been erected where four roads meet. Siege Avenue, in the suburb of Kenilworth, 250 ft. wide, a mile and a quarter long, and planted with 16 rows of trees, was also laid out during the siege. In the public gardens are statues of Queen Victoria and Cecil Rhodes. The diamond mines form, however, the chief attraction of the town (see Diamond). Of these the Kimberley is within a few minutes’ walk of market square. The De Beers mine is one mile east of the Kimberley mine. The other principal mines, Bultfontein, Du Toits Pan and Wesselton, are still farther distant from the town. Barbed wire fencing surrounds the mines, which cover about 180 acres.
KIMBERLEY, a town in the Cape province of South Africa, is the center of the Griqualand West diamond industry, located 647 km northeast of Cape Town and 310 km southwest of Johannesburg by rail. The population in 1904 was 34,331, including 13,556 whites. The town is situated on the open veld between the Modder and Vaal Rivers, at an elevation of 4,012 feet above sea level. It developed from camps around the diamond mines, giving it a very irregular layout, which contrasts sharply with the typical rectangular shape of South African towns. Around the market square, you can find the law courts featuring an impressive clock tower, along with the post and telegraph offices, and the town hall. The public library and hospital are located on Du Toits Pan Road. In the Newton district, established during the siege from 1899 to 1900, there is a monument at the intersection of four roads honoring those who died during the conflict. Siege Avenue in the Kenilworth suburb is 250 feet wide and a mile and a quarter long, lined with 16 rows of trees, and was also created during the siege. The public gardens feature statues of Queen Victoria and Cecil Rhodes. However, the diamond mines are the town's main attraction (see Diamond). The Kimberley mine is just a few minutes' walk from the market square, while the De Beers mine is one mile east of the Kimberley mine. The other main mines, Bultfontein, Du Toits Pan, and Wesselton, are located even farther from the town. The mines are enclosed by barbed wire fencing and cover an area of about 180 acres.
The Kaffirs who work in the mines are housed in large compounds. Wire netting is spread over these enclosures, and every precaution taken to prevent the illicit disposal of diamonds. Ample provision is made for the comfort of the inmates, who in addition to food and lodging earn from 17s. to 24s. a week. Most of the white workmen employed live at Kenilworth, laid out by the De Beers company as a “model village.” Beaconsfield, near Du Toits Pan Mine, is also dependent on the diamond industry.
The workers from the indigenous communities who are employed in the mines live in large housing areas. Wire mesh is placed over these enclosures, and every measure is taken to stop the illegal selling of diamonds. They are provided with plenty of comforts, as they receive food and shelter and earn between 17s. and 24s. a week. Most of the white workers live in Kenilworth, designed by the De Beers company as a "model village." Beaconsfield, located near the Du Toits Pan Mine, also relies on the diamond industry.
Kimberley was founded in 1870 by diggers who discovered diamonds on the farms of Du Toits Pan and Bultfontein. In 1871 richer diamonds were found on the neighbouring farm of Vooruitzight at places named De Beers and Colesberg Kopje. There were at first three distinct mining camps, one at Du Toits Pan, another at De Beers (called De Beers Rush or Old De Beers) and the third at the Colesberg Kopje (called De Beers New Rush, or New Rush simply). The Colesberg Kopje mine was in July 1873 renamed Kimberley in honour of the then secretary of state for the colonies, the 1st earl of Kimberley, by whose direction the mines were—in 1871—taken under the protection of Great Britain. Kimberley was also chosen as the name of the town into which the mining camps developed. Doubt having arisen as to the rights of the crown to the minerals on Vooruitzight farm, litigation ensued, ending in the purchase of the farm by the state for £100,000 in 1875. In 1880 the town was incorporated in Cape Colony (see Griqualand). In 1874 a great part of the population left for the newly discovered gold diggings in the Lydenburg district of the Transvaal, but others took their place. Among those early attracted to Kimberley were Cecil Rhodes and “Barney” Barnato, who in time came to represent two groups of financiers controlling the mines. The amalgamation of their interests in 1889—when the De Beers group purchased the Kimberley mine for £5,338,650—put the whole diamond production of the Kimberley fields in the hands of one company, the De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd., so named after the former owners of the farms on which are situated the chief mines. Kimberley in consequence became largely dependent on the good-will of the De Beers corporation, the town having practically no industries other than diamond mining. Horse-breeding is carried on to a limited extent. The value of the annual output of diamonds averages about £4,500,000. The importance of the industry led to the building of a railway from Cape Town, opened in 1885. On the outbreak of war between the British and the Boers in 1899 Kimberley was invested by a Boer force. The siege began on the 12th of October and lasted until the 15th of February 1900, when the town was relieved by General Sir John French. Among the besieged was Cecil Rhodes, who placed the resources of the De Beers company at the disposal of the defenders. In 1906 the town was put in direct railway communication with Johannesburg, and in 1908 the completion of the line from Bloemfontein gave Natal direct access to Kimberley, which thus became an important railway centre.
Kimberley was established in 1870 by miners who discovered diamonds on the farms of Du Toits Pan and Bultfontein. In 1871, richer diamonds were found on the nearby farm of Vooruitzight in areas called De Beers and Colesberg Kopje. Initially, there were three distinct mining camps: one at Du Toits Pan, another at De Beers (referred to as De Beers Rush or Old De Beers), and the third at Colesberg Kopje (known as De Beers New Rush or simply New Rush). The Colesberg Kopje mine was renamed Kimberley in July 1873 in honor of the then Secretary of State for the Colonies, the 1st Earl of Kimberley, who directed that the mines be brought under the protection of Great Britain in 1871. Kimberley also became the name of the town that grew from the mining camps. There was some doubt about the crown's rights to the minerals on Vooruitzight farm, which led to litigation, culminating in the state's purchase of the farm for £100,000 in 1875. In 1880, the town was incorporated into Cape Colony (see Griqualand). In 1874, many residents left for the newly discovered gold diggings in the Lydenburg district of the Transvaal, but others moved in to take their place. Among those who were drawn to Kimberley early on were Cecil Rhodes and “Barney” Barnato, who eventually became representatives of two groups of financiers controlling the mines. Their interests merged in 1889 when the De Beers group bought the Kimberley mine for £5,338,650, consolidating all diamond production in the Kimberley fields under one company, the De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd., named after the former owners of the farms where the main mines are located. Consequently, Kimberley became largely dependent on the goodwill of the De Beers corporation, as the town had virtually no industries beyond diamond mining. Limited horse-breeding also took place. The annual diamond output is valued at around £4,500,000. The significance of the industry led to the construction of a railway from Cape Town, which opened in 1885. When war broke out between the British and the Boers in 1899, Kimberley was besieged by a Boer force. The siege started on October 12 and lasted until February 15, 1900, when the town was relieved by General Sir John French. Among the besieged was Cecil Rhodes, who offered the resources of the De Beers company to the defenders. In 1906, the town was directly connected by railway to Johannesburg, and in 1908, the completion of the line from Bloemfontein provided Natal with direct access to Kimberley, establishing it as an important railway hub.

KIMERIDGIAN, in geology, the basal division of the Upper Oolites in the Jurassic system. The name is derived from the hamlet of Kimeridge or Kimmeridge near the coast of Dorsetshire, England. It appears to have been first suggested by T. Webster in 1812; in 1818, in the form Kimeridge Clay, it was used by Buckland. From the Dorsetshire coast, where it is splendidly exposed in the fine cliffs from St Alban’s Head to Gad Cliff, it follows the line of Jurassic outcrop through Wiltshire, where there is a broad expanse between Westbury and Devizes, as far as Yorkshire, there it appears in the vale of Pickering and on the coast in Filey Bay. It generally occupied broad valleys, of which the vale of Aylesbury may be taken as typical. Good exposures occur at Seend, Calne, Swindon, Wootton Bassett, Faringdon, Abingdon, Culham, Shotover Hill, Brill, Ely and Market Rasen. Traces of the formation are found as far north as the east coast of Cromarty and Sutherland at Eathie and Helmsdale.
KIMERIDGIAN, in geology, the lowest part of the Upper Oolites in the Jurassic system. The name comes from the village of Kimeridge or Kimmeridge near the Dorsetshire coast in England. It appears to have been first proposed by T. Webster in 1812; in 1818, Buckland referred to it as Kimeridge Clay. From the Dorsetshire coast, where it is beautifully visible in the cliffs from St Alban’s Head to Gad Cliff, it extends along the Jurassic outcrop through Wiltshire, where there is a wide area between Westbury and Devizes, reaching as far as Yorkshire, where it appears in the Pickering valley and along the coast at Filey Bay. It usually formed broad valleys, with the vale of Aylesbury being a representative example. Good exposures can be seen at Seend, Calne, Swindon, Wootton Bassett, Faringdon, Abingdon, Culham, Shotover Hill, Brill, Ely, and Market Rasen. Signs of the formation can be found as far north as the east coast of Cromarty and Sutherland at Eathie and Helmsdale.
In England the Kimeridgian is usually divisible into an Upper Series, 600-650 ft. in the south, dark bituminous shales, paper 800 shales and clays with layers and nodules of cement-stones and septaria. These beds merge gradually into the overlying Portlandian formation. The Lower Series, with a maximum thickness of 400 ft., consists of clays and dark shales with septaria, cement-stones and calcareous “doggers.” These lithological characters are very persistent. The Upper Kimeridgian is distinguished as the zone of Perisphincles biplex, with the sub-zone of Discina latissima in the higher portions. Cardioceras alternans is the zonal ammonite characteristic of the lower division, with the sub-zone of Ostrea deltoidea in the lower portion. Exogyra virgula is common in the upper part of the lower division, and the lower part of the Upper Kimeridgian. A large number of ammonites are peculiar to this formation, including Reineckia eudoxus, R. Thurmanni, Aspidoceras longispinus, &c. Large dinosaurian reptiles are abundant, Cetiosaurus, Gigantosaurus, Megalosaurus, also plesiosaurs and ichthyosaurs; crocodilian and chelonian remains are also found. Protocardia striatula, Thracia depressa, Belemnites abreviatus, B. Blainvillei, Lingula ovalis, Rhynchonella inconstans and Exogyra nana are characteristic fossils. Alum has been obtained from the Kimeridge Clay, and the cement-stones have been employed in Purbeck; coprolites are found in small quantities. Bricks, tiles, flower-pots, &c., are made from the clay at Swindon, Gillingham, Brill, Ely, Horncastle, and other places. The so-called “Kimeridge coal” is a highly bituminous shale capable of being used as fuel, which has been worked on the cliff at Little Kimeridge.
In England, the Kimeridgian is generally divided into an Upper Series, which ranges from 600 to 650 ft. in the south, characterized by dark bituminous shales, paper shales, and clays, all containing layers and nodules of cement stones and septaria. These layers gradually blend into the overlying Portlandian formation. The Lower Series, with a maximum thickness of 400 ft., consists of clays and dark shales that also contain septaria, cement stones, and calcareous “doggers.” These rock types are quite consistent. The Upper Kimeridgian is recognized as the zone of Perisphincles biplex, with a sub-zone of Discina latissima in the upper sections. The characteristic zonal ammonite for the lower division is Cardioceras alternans, with the sub-zone of Ostrea deltoidea in the lower part. In the upper part of the lower division and the lower part of the Upper Kimeridgian, Exogyra virgula is commonly found. A variety of ammonites unique to this formation includes Reineckia eudoxus, R. Thurmanni, Aspidoceras longispinus, and others. Large dinosaur reptiles, such as Cetiosaurus, Gigantosaurus, and Megalosaurus, along with plesiosaurs and ichthyosaurs, are plentiful, and remains of crocodilians and turtles have also been discovered. Characteristic fossils include Protocardia striatula, Thracia depressa, Belemnites abreviatus, B. Blainvillei, Lingula ovalis, Rhynchonella inconstans, and Exogyra nana. Alum has been extracted from the Kimeridge Clay, and cement stones have been used in Purbeck; coprolites are found in small amounts. Bricks, tiles, and flower pots are produced from clay in Swindon, Gillingham, Brill, Ely, Horncastle, and other locations. The so-called “Kimeridge coal” is a highly bituminous shale that can be used as fuel, and it has been mined on the cliff at Little Kimeridge.
The “Kimeridgien” of continental geologists is usually made to contain the three sub-divisions of A. Oppel and W. Waagen, viz.:—
The "Kimeridgian" of continental geologists typically includes the three subdivisions identified by A. Oppel and W. Waagen, namely:—
Kimeridgien | Upper | (Virgulian) | with Exogyra virgula |
Middle | (Pteroceran) | with Pteroceras oceani | |
Lower | (Astartian) | with Astarte supracorallina; |
but the upper portion of this continental Kimeridgian is equivalent to some of the British Portlandian; while most of the Astartian corresponds to the Corallian. A. de Lapparent now recognizes only the Virgulian and Pteroceran in the Kimeridgien. Clays and marls with occasional limestones and sandstones represent the Kimeridgien of most of northern Europe, including Russia. In Swabia and some other parts of Germany the curious ruiniform marble Felsenkalk occurs on this horizon, and most of the Kimeridgien of southern Europe, including the Alps, is calcareous. Representatives of the formation occur in Caucasia, Algeria, Abyssinia, Madagascar; in South America with volcanic rocks, and possibly in California (Maripan beds), Alaska and King Charles’s Land.
but the upper part of this continental Kimeridgian is similar to some of the British Portlandian; while most of the Astartian corresponds to the Corallian. A. de Lapparent now only recognizes the Virgulian and Pteroceran in the Kimeridgien. Clays and marls with occasional limestones and sandstones make up the Kimeridgien of most of northern Europe, including Russia. In Swabia and some other areas of Germany, the interesting ruiniform marble Felsenkalk appears at this level, and most of the Kimeridgien in southern Europe, including the Alps, is calcareous. Representatives of the formation can be found in Caucasia, Algeria, Abyssinia, Madagascar; in South America alongside volcanic rocks, and possibly in California (Maripan beds), Alaska, and King Charles’s Land.
See “Jurassic Rocks of Britain,” vols. v. and i., Memoirs of the Geological Survey (vol. v. contains references to literature up to 1895).
See “Jurassic Rocks of Britain,” vols. v. and i., Memoirs of the Geological Survey (vol. v. contains references to literature up to 1895).

ḲIMḤI, or Qimḥi, the family name of three Jewish grammarians and biblical scholars who worked at Narbonne in the 12th century and the beginning of the 13th, and exercised great influence on the study of the Hebrew language. The name, as is shown by manuscript testimony, was also pronounced Ḳamḥi and further mention is made of the French surname Petit.
ḲIMḤI, or Qimḥi is the last name of three Jewish grammarians and biblical scholars who were active in Narbonne during the 12th century and the early 13th century, and they had a significant impact on Hebrew language studies. Manuscripts indicate that the name was also pronounced Ḳamḥi, and there is additional mention of the French surname Petit.
Joseph Ḳimḥi was a native of southern Spain, and settled in Provence, where he was one of the first to set forth in the Hebrew language the results of Hebraic philology as expounded by the Spanish Jews in their Arabic treatises. He was acquainted moreover with Latin grammar, under the influence of which he resorted to the innovation of dividing the Hebrew vowels into five long vowels and five short, previous grammarians having simply spoken of seven vowels without distinction of quantity. His grammatical textbook, Sefer Ha-Zikkaron, “Book of Remembrance” (ed. W. Bacher, Berlin, 1888), was marked by methodical comprehensiveness, and introduced into the theory of the verbs a new classification of the stems which has been retained by later scholars. In the far more ample Sefer Ha-Galuy, “Book of Demonstration” (ed. Matthews, Berlin, 1887), Joseph Ḳimḥi attacks the philological work of the greatest French Talmud scholar of that day, R. Jacob Tam, who espoused the antiquated system of Menaḥem b. Saruq, and this he supplements by an independent critique of Menaḥem. This work is a mine of varied exegetical and philological details. He also wrote commentaries—the majority of which are lost—on a great number of the scriptural books. Those on Proverbs and Job have been published. He composed an apologetic work under the title Sefer Ha-Berith (“Book of the Bond”), a fragment of which is extant, and translated into Hebrew the ethico-philosophical work of Baḥya ibn Paquda (“Duties of the Heart”). In his commentaries he also made contributions to the comparative philology of Hebrew and Arabic.
Joseph Kimhi was from southern Spain and later settled in Provence, where he was among the first to present the findings of Hebraic philology in Hebrew, based on the works of Spanish Jews in their Arabic texts. He was also familiar with Latin grammar, which led him to innovate by splitting Hebrew vowels into five long and five short categories, whereas earlier grammarians had simply referred to seven vowels without distinguishing their length. His grammatical textbook, Sefer Ha-Zikkaron, “Book of Remembrance” (ed. W. Bacher, Berlin, 1888), was known for its organized thoroughness and introduced a new classification of verb stems that later scholars continued to use. In the more extensive Sefer Ha-Galuy, “Book of Demonstration” (ed. Matthews, Berlin, 1887), Joseph Ḳimḥi critiques the philological work of R. Jacob Tam, the leading French Talmud scholar of his time, who followed the outdated system of Menaḥem b. Saruq, and he adds his own independent critique of Menaḥem as well. This work is rich in various exegetical and philological details. He also wrote commentaries on many scriptural books, most of which are now lost, although those on Proverbs and Job have been published. He created an apologetic text called Sefer Ha-Berith (“Book of the Bond”), of which a fragment still exists, and he translated into Hebrew the ethical and philosophical work of Baḥya ibn Paquda (“Duties of the Heart”). In his commentaries, he also contributed to the comparative philology of Hebrew and Arabic.
Moses Ḳimḥi was the author of a Hebrew grammar, known—after the first three words—as Mahalak Shebile Ha-daat, or briefly as Mahalak. It is an elementary introduction to the study of Hebrew, the first of its kind, in which only the most indispensable definitions and rules have a place, the remainder being almost wholly occupied by paradigms. Moses Ḳimḥi was the first who made the verb paqadh a model for conjugation, and the first also who introduced the now usual sequence in the enumeration of stem-forms. His handbook was of great historical importance as in the first half of the 16th century it became the favourite manual for the study of Hebrew among non-Judaic scholars (1st ed., Pesaro, 1508). Elias Levita (q.v.) wrote Hebrew explanations, and Sebastian Münster translated it into Latin. Moses Ḳimḥi also composed commentaries to the biblical books; those on Proverbs, Ezra and Nehemiah are in the great rabbinical bibles falsely ascribed to Abraham ibn Ezra.
Moses Kimhi was the author of a Hebrew grammar, known—after the first three words—as Mahalak Shebile Ha-daat, or simply Mahalak. It serves as an elementary introduction to learning Hebrew, being the first of its kind, where only the most essential definitions and rules are included, with the rest mainly consisting of paradigms. Moses Ḳimḥi was the first to use the verb paqadh as a model for conjugation and also the first to introduce the typical order in listing stem-forms. His handbook was historically significant as, during the first half of the 16th century, it became the preferred guide for studying Hebrew among non-Jewish scholars (1st ed., Pesaro, 1508). Elias Levita (q.v.) provided Hebrew explanations, and Sebastian Münster translated it into Latin. Moses Ḳimḥi also wrote commentaries on biblical books; those on Proverbs, Ezra, and Nehemiah are mistakenly attributed to Abraham ibn Ezra in the major rabbinical bibles.
David Ḳimḥi (c. 1160-1235), also known as Redaq (= R. David Ḳimḥi), eclipsed the fame both of his father and his brother. From the writings of the former he quotes a great number of explanations, some of which are known only from this source. His magnum opus is the Sefer Miklol, “Book of Completeness.” This falls into two divisions: the grammar, to which the title of the whole, Miklol, is usually applied (first printed in Constantinople, 1532-1534, then, with the notes of Elias Levita, at Venice, 1545), and the lexicon, Sefer Hashorashim, “Book of Roots,” which was first printed in Italy before 1480, then at Naples in 1490, and at Venice in 1546 with the annotations of Elias. The model and the principal source for this work of David Ḳimḥi’s was the book of R. Jonah (Abulwalid), which was cast in a similar bipartite form; and it was chiefly due to Ḳimḥi’s grammar and lexicon that, while the contents of Abulwalid’s works were common knowledge, they themselves remained in oblivion for centuries. In spite of this dependence on his predecessors his work shows originality, especially in the arrangement of his material. In the grammar he combined the paradigmatic method of his brother Moses with the procedure of the older scholars who devoted a close attention to details. In his dictionary, again, he recast the lexicological materials independently, and enriched lexicography itself, especially by his numerous etymological explanations. Under the title Eṭ Sofer, “Pen of the Writer” (Lyk, 1864), David Ḳimḥi composed a sort of grammatical compendium as a guide to the correct punctuation of the biblical manuscripts; it consists, for the most part, of extracts from the Miklol. After the completion of his great work he began to write commentaries on portions of the Scriptures. The first was on Chronicles, then followed one on the Psalms, and finally his exegetical masterpiece—the commentary on the prophets. His annotations on the Psalms are especially interesting for the polemical excursuses directed against the Christian interpretation. He was also responsible for a commentary on Genesis (ed. A. Günsburg, Pressburg, 1842), in which he followed Moses Maimonides in explaining biblical narratives as visions. He was an enthusiastic adherent of Maimonides, and, though far advanced in years, took an active part in the battle which raged in southern France and Spain round his philosophico-religious writings. The popularity of his biblical exegesis is demonstrated by the fact that the first printed texts of the Hebrew Bible were accompanied by his commentary: the Psalms 1477, perhaps at Bologna; the early Prophets, 1485, Soncino; the later Prophets, ibid. 1486.
David Kimhi (c. 1160-1235), also known as Redaq (= R. David Ḳimḥi), surpassed the recognition of both his father and brother. He quotes a significant number of explanations from his father's writings, some of which are only known through this source. His magnum opus is the Sefer Miklol, “Book of Completeness.” This work is divided into two parts: the grammar, which the whole title Miklol usually refers to (first printed in Constantinople, 1532-1534, then with the notes of Elias Levita in Venice, 1545), and the lexicon, Sefer Hashorashim, “Book of Roots,” which was first printed in Italy before 1480, then in Naples in 1490, and in Venice in 1546 with annotations by Elias. David Ḳimḥi's work was modeled primarily on the book of R. Jonah (Abulwalid), which had a similar two-part structure; it was mainly due to Ḳimḥi’s grammar and lexicon that, while Abulwalid’s works became common knowledge, they were largely forgotten for centuries. Despite relying on his predecessors, his work displays originality, especially in how he organized his material. In grammar, he merged the paradigmatic method of his brother Moses with the detailed approach of earlier scholars. In his dictionary, he presented lexicological materials in a new way and advanced lexicography, particularly through his many etymological explanations. Under the title Eṭ Sofer, “Pen of the Writer” (Lyk, 1864), David Ḳimḥi created a kind of grammatical handbook to guide the correct punctuation of biblical texts; this mainly consists of extracts from the Miklol. After completing his major work, he began writing commentaries on various parts of the Scriptures. The first was on Chronicles, followed by one on the Psalms, and ultimately his exegetical masterpiece—the commentary on the prophets. His notes on the Psalms are particularly noteworthy for the polemical discussions against Christian interpretations. He also wrote a commentary on Genesis (ed. A. Günsburg, Pressburg, 1842), where he followed Moses Maimonides in interpreting biblical stories as visions. He was a devoted follower of Maimonides and, though he was quite old, actively participated in the debates that took place in southern France and Spain surrounding Maimonides' philosophical and religious writings. The popularity of his biblical exegesis is highlighted by the fact that the first printed editions of the Hebrew Bible were accompanied by his commentary: the Psalms in 1477, possibly in Bologna; the early Prophets in 1485, Soncino; and the later Prophets, also in 1486.
His commentaries have been frequently reprinted, many of them in Latin translations. A new edition of that on the Psalms was begun by Schiller-Szinessy (First Book of Psalms, Cambridge, 1883). Abr. Geiger wrote of the three excursuses Ḳimḥis in the Hebrew periodical Oẓar Neḥmad (vol. ii., 1857 = A. Geiger, Gesammelte Schriften, v. 1-47). See further the Jewish Encyclopedia.
His commentaries have often been reprinted, many of them in Latin translations. A new edition of the one on the Psalms was started by Schiller-Szinessy (First Book of Psalms, Cambridge, 1883). Abr. Geiger wrote about the three excursuses Ḳimḥis in the Hebrew periodical Oẓar Neḥmad (vol. ii., 1857 = A. Geiger, Gesammelte Schriften, v. 1-47). See further the Jewish Encyclopedia.

KIN (O.E. cyn, a word represented in nearly all Teutonic languages, cf. Du. kunne, Dan. and Swed. kön, Goth kuni, tribe; the Teutonic base is kunya; the equivalent Aryan root gan-to beget, produce, is seen in Gr. γένος, Lat. genus, cf. “kind”), a collective word for persons related by blood, as descended from a common ancestor. In law, the term “next of kin” is applied to the person or persons who, as being in the nearest degree of blood relationship to a person dying intestate, share according to 801 degree in his personal estate (see Intestacy, and Inheritance). “Kin” is frequently associated with “kith” in the phrase “kith and kin,” now used as an emphasized form of “kin” for family relatives. It properly means one’s “country and kin,” or one’s “friends and kin.” Kith (O.E. cyððe and cyð, native land, acquaintances) comes from the stem of cunnan, to know, and thus means the land or people one knows familiarly.
KIN (O.E. cyn, a term found in nearly all Teutonic languages, e.g., Du. kunne, Dan. and Swed. kön, Goth kuni, tribe; the Teutonic root is kunya; the equivalent Aryan root gan-to beget, produce, appears in Gr. genus, Lat. genus, cf. “kind”), refers to a group of people related by blood, as descendants of a common ancestor. In legal terms, “next of kin” is applied to the individual or individuals who share the closest blood relationship to someone who dies without a will, and are entitled to inherit from the deceased's estate according to 801 degree (see Intestacy, and Inheritance). “Kin” is often paired with “kith” in the phrase “kith and kin,” which is now used as an emphasized term for “kin” to refer to family members. It properly means one’s “country and kin,” or one’s “friends and kin.” Kith (O.E. cyððe and cyð, native land, acquaintances) derives from the root of cunnan, to know, and thus represents the land or people one knows well.
The suffix -kin, chiefly surviving in English surnames, seems to have been early used as a diminutive ending to certain Christian names in Flanders and Holland. The termination is represented by the diminutive -chen in German, as in Kindchen, Häuschen, &c. Many English words, such as “pumpkin,” “firkin,” seem to have no diminutive significance, and may have been assimilated from earlier forms, e.g. “pumpkin” from “pumpion.”
The suffix -kin, mainly found in English last names, appears to have originally been used as a diminutive ending for certain Christian names in Flanders and Holland. This ending is represented by the diminutive -chen in German, as in Kindchen, Häuschen, etc. Many English words, like “pumpkin” and “firkin,” don’t seem to carry any diminutive meaning and may have come from earlier forms, for example, “pumpkin” from “pumpion.”

KINCARDINESHIRE, or The Mearns, an eastern county of Scotland, bounded E. by the North Sea, S. and S.W. by Forfarshire, and N.W. and N. by Aberdeenshire. Area, 243,974 acres, or 381 sq. m. In the west and north-west the Grampians are the predominant feature. The highest of their peaks is Mount Battock (2555 ft.), where the counties of Aberdeen, Forfar and Kincardine meet, but there are a score of hills exceeding 1500 ft. in height. In the extreme north, on the confines of Aberdeenshire, the Hill of Fare, famous for its sheep walks, attains an altitude of 1545 ft. In the north the county slopes from the Grampians to the picturesque and finely-wooded valley of the Dee, and in the south it falls to the Howe (Hollow) of the Mearns, which is a continuation north-eastwards of Strathmore. The principal rivers are Bervie Water (20 m. long), flowing south-eastwards to the North Sea; the Water of Feugh (20 m.) taking a north-easterly direction and falling into the Dee at Banchory, and forming near its mouth a beautiful cascade; the Dye (15 m.) rising in Mount Battock and ending its course in the Feugh; Luther Water (14 m.) springing not far from the castle of Drumtochty and meandering pleasantly to its junction with the North Esk; the Cowie (13 m.) and the Carron (8½ m.) entering the sea at Stonehaven. The Dee and North Esk serve as boundary streams during part of their course, the one of Aberdeenshire, the other of Forfarshire. Loch Loirston, in the parish of Nigg, and Loch Lumgair, in Dunnottar parish, both small, are the only lakes in the shire. Of the glens Glen Dye in the north centre of the county is remarkable for its beauty, and the small Den Fenella, to the south-east of Laurencekirk, contains a picturesque waterfall. Its name perpetuates the memory of Fenella, daughter of a thane of Angus, who was slain here after betraying Kenneth II. to his enemies, who (according to local tradition) made away with him in Kincardine Castle. Excepting in the vicinity of St Cyrus, the coast from below Johnshaven to Girdle Ness presents a bold front of rugged cliffs, with an average height of from 100 to 250 ft., interrupted only by occasional creeks and bays, as at Johnshaven, Gourdon, Bervie, Stonehaven, Portlethen, Findon, Cove and Nigg.
Kincardineshire, or The Mearns, is an eastern county of Scotland, bordered to the east by the North Sea, to the south and southwest by Forfarshire, and to the northwest and north by Aberdeenshire. It covers an area of 243,974 acres, or 381 square miles. The Grampians dominate the landscape in the west and northwest, with Mount Battock being the highest peak at 2,555 feet, where Aberdeen, Forfar, and Kincardine meet; there are about twenty other hills that are over 1,500 feet high. In the far north, along the Aberdeenshire border, the Hill of Fare, known for its sheep walks, reaches an elevation of 1,545 feet. To the north, the land rises from the Grampians to the beautiful and well-wooded valley of the Dee, while to the south it descends to the Howe (Hollow) of the Mearns, which continues northeastward from Strathmore. The main rivers are Bervie Water (20 miles long), flowing southeast to the North Sea; the Water of Feugh (20 miles), heading northeast and entering the Dee at Banchory, where it forms a lovely cascade near its mouth; the Dye (15 miles), which starts at Mount Battock and flows into the Feugh; Luther Water (14 miles), which begins near Drumtochty Castle and winds its way to join the North Esk; and the Cowie (13 miles) and the Carron (8½ miles), both flowing into the sea at Stonehaven. The Dee and North Esk act as boundary rivers along part of their routes, with one marking Aberdeenshire and the other Forfarshire. Loch Loirston in the parish of Nigg and Loch Lumgair in the parish of Dunnottar are both small and the only lakes in the shire. Among the glens, Glen Dye in the northern center of the county is notable for its beauty, and the small Den Fenella, southeast of Laurencekirk, features a scenic waterfall. Its name honors Fenella, the daughter of a thane of Angus, who was killed here after betraying Kenneth II. to his enemies, who (according to local legend) took him out at Kincardine Castle. Except for the area around St. Cyrus, the coastline from just south of Johnshaven to Girdle Ness showcases a dramatic line of rugged cliffs, averaging between 100 to 250 feet high, occasionally interrupted by creeks and bays at Johnshaven, Gourdon, Bervie, Stonehaven, Portlethen, Findon, Cove, and Nigg.
Geology.—The great fault which traverses Scotland from shore to shore passes through this county from Craigeven Bay, about a mile north of Stonehaven, by Fenella Hill to Edzell. On the northern side of this line are the old crystalline schists of the Dalradian group; on the southern side Old Red Sandstone occupies all the remaining space. Good exposures of the schists are seen, repeatedly folded, in the cliffs between Aberdeen and Stonehaven. They consist of a lower series of greenish slates and a higher, more micaceous and schistose series with grits; bands of limestone occur in these rocks near Bunchory. Besides the numerous minor flexures the schists are bent into a broad synclinal fold which crosses the county, its axis lying in a south-westerly-north-easterly direction. Rising through the schists are several granite masses, the largest being that forming the high ground around Mt Battock; south of the Dee are several smaller masses, some of which have been extensively quarried. The lower part of the Old Red Sandstone consists of flags, red sandstones and purple clays in great thickness; these are followed by coarse conglomerates, well seen in the cliff at Dunnottar Castle, with ashy grits and some thin sheets of diabase. The diabase forms the Bruxie and Leys Hills and some minor elevations. Above the volcanic series more red sandstones, conglomerates and marls appear. The Old Red Sandstone is folded synclinally in a direction continuing the vale of Strathmore; south of this is an anticline, as may be seen on the coast between St Cyrus and Kinneff. Glacial striae on the higher ground and débris on the lower ground show that the direction taken by the ice flow was south-eastward on the hills but as the shore was approached it gradually took on an easterly and finally a northerly direction.
Geology.—The major fault that runs across Scotland from coast to coast passes through this county, starting from Craigeven Bay, about a mile north of Stonehaven, and going through Fenella Hill to Edzell. On the northern side of this line, you'll find the ancient crystalline schists of the Dalradian group; on the southern side, the Old Red Sandstone takes up all the remaining area. There are excellent exposures of the schists, which are repeatedly folded, in the cliffs between Aberdeen and Stonehaven. They consist of a lower series of greenish slates and a higher series that is more micaceous and schistose, containing grits; bands of limestone can be found in these rocks near Banchory. In addition to the many minor flexures, the schists are shaped into a wide synclinal fold that crosses the county, with its axis running in a south-westerly to north-easterly direction. Several granite masses rise through the schists, with the largest forming the high ground around Mt Battock; to the south of the Dee, there are several smaller masses, some of which have been extensively quarried. The lower part of the Old Red Sandstone consists of flags, red sandstones, and thick layers of purple clays; these are followed by coarse conglomerates, clearly visible in the cliff at Dunnottar Castle, along with ashy grits and some thin sheets of diabase. The diabase makes up the Bruxie and Leys Hills and some smaller elevations. Above the volcanic series, more red sandstones, conglomerates, and marls can be found. The Old Red Sandstone is folded in a synclinal shape in a direction that continues along the vale of Strathmore; to the south of this is an anticline, which can be observed along the coast between St Cyrus and Kinneff. Glacial striae on the higher ground and debris on the lower ground indicate that the ice flow initially moved southeastward on the hills, but as it got closer to the shore, it gradually shifted to an easterly and finally a northerly direction.
Climate and Agriculture.—The climate is healthy, but often cold, owing to the exposure to east winds. The average temperature for the year is 45° F., for July 58°, and for January 37°. The average annual rainfall is 34 in. Much of the Grampian territory is occupied by grouse moors, but the land by the Dee, in the Howe and along the coast, is scientifically farmed and yields well. The soil of the Howe is richer and stronger than that in the Dee valley, but the most fertile region is along the coast, where the soil is generally deep loam resting on clay, although in some places it is poor and thin, or stiff and cold. Oats are the principal crop, wheat is not largely grown, but the demands of the distillers maintain a very considerable acreage under barley. Rather more than one-tenth of the total area is under wood. Turnips form the main green crop, but potatoes are extensively raised. A little more than half the holdings consist of 50 acres and under. Great attention is paid to livestock. Shorthorns are the most common breed, but the principal home-bred stock is a cross between shorthorned and polled, though there are many valuable herds of pure polled. Cattle-feeding is carried on according to the most advanced methods. Blackfaced sheep are chiefly kept on the hill runs, Cheviots or a cross with Leicesters being usually found on the lowland farms. Most of the horses are employed in connexion with the cultivation of the soil, but several good strains, including Clydesdales, are retained for stock purposes. Pigs are also reared in considerable numbers.
Climate and Agriculture.—The climate is generally healthy, but often cold due to exposure to east winds. The average annual temperature is 45°F, with July averaging 58°F and January 37°F. The average yearly rainfall is 34 inches. Much of the Grampian area is made up of grouse moors, but the land along the Dee and the coast is scientifically farmed and produces well. The soil in the Howe is richer and stronger than that in the Dee valley, but the most fertile area is along the coast, where the soil is typically deep loam sitting on clay, although in some spots it can be poor, thin, stiff, or cold. Oats are the main crop, wheat is not grown widely, but distillers' demands keep a significant amount of land dedicated to barley. Just over one-tenth of the total area is covered in woodlands. Turnips are the primary green crop, but potatoes are also widely grown. A little more than half of the farms are 50 acres or smaller. Great care is given to livestock. Shorthorns are the most common breed, but the main locally bred stock is a mix of shorthorn and polled types, although many valuable herds of pure polled exist. Cattle-feeding practices are carried out using the latest methods. Blackfaced sheep are mainly kept on the hill pastures, while Cheviots or crossbreeds with Leicesters are usually found on the lowland farms. Most of the horses are used for soil cultivation, but several good breeds, including Clydesdales, are kept for breeding purposes. Pigs are also raised in substantial numbers.
Other Industries.—Apart from agriculture, the principal industry is the fishing, of which Stonehaven is the centre. The coast being dangerous and the harbours difficult in rough weather, the fishermen often run great risks. The village of Findon (pron. Finnan) has given its name to the well-known smoked haddocks, which were first cured in this way at that hamlet. The salmon fisheries of the sea and the rivers yield a substantial annual return. Manufactures are of little more than local importance. Woollens are made at Stonehaven, and at Bervie, Laurencekirk and a few other places flax-spinning and weaving are carried on. There are also some distilleries, breweries and tanneries. Stonehaven, Gourdon and Johnshaven are the chief ports for seaborne trade.
Other Industries.—Besides agriculture, the main industry is fishing, with Stonehaven as the hub. The coastline is treacherous and the harbors challenging during rough weather, so fishermen often take significant risks. The village of Findon (pron. Finnan) is famous for its smoked haddocks, which were first prepared that way in this village. The salmon fisheries in both the sea and rivers provide a substantial annual income. Manufacturing is mainly of local significance. Wool products are made in Stonehaven, and in Bervie, Laurencekirk, and a few other spots, flax spinning and weaving take place. There are also several distilleries, breweries, and tanneries. Stonehaven, Gourdon, and Johnshaven are the main ports for maritime trade.
The Deeside railway runs through the portion of the county on the northern bank of the Dee. The Caledonian and North British railways run to Aberdeen via Laurencekirk to Stonehaven, using the same metals, and there is a branch line of the N.B.R. from Montrose to Bervie. There are also coaches between Blairs and Aberdeen, Bervie and Stonehaven, Fettercairn and Edzell, Banchory and Birse, and other points.
The Deeside railway goes through the part of the county on the northern bank of the Dee. The Caledonian and North British railways travel to Aberdeen via Laurencekirk to Stonehaven, using the same tracks, and there’s a branch line of the N.B.R. from Montrose to Bervie. There are also buses connecting Blairs and Aberdeen, Bervie and Stonehaven, Fettercairn and Edzell, Banchory and Birse, and other locations.
Population and Government.—The population was 35,492 in 1891, and 40,923 in 1901, when 103 persons spoke Gaelic and English. The chief town is Stonehaven (pop. in 1901, 4577) with Laurencekirk (1512) and Banchory (1475), but part of the city of Aberdeen, with a population of 9386, is within the county. The county returns one member to parliament, and Bervie, the only royal burgh, belongs to the Montrose group of parliamentary burghs. Kincardine is united in one sheriffdom with the shires of Aberdeen and Banff, and one of the Aberdeen sheriffs-substitute sits at Stonehaven. The county is under school-board jurisdiction. The academy at Stonehaven and a few of the public schools earn grants for higher education. The county council hands over the “residue” grant to the county secondary education committee, which expends it in technical education grants. At Blairs, in the north-east of the shire near the Dee, is a Roman Catholic college for the training of young men for the priesthood.
Population and Government.—The population was 35,492 in 1891 and 40,923 in 1901, at which time 103 people spoke Gaelic and English. The main town is Stonehaven (population in 1901, 4,577), along with Laurencekirk (1,512) and Banchory (1,475), but part of the city of Aberdeen, with a population of 9,386, is located within the county. The county elects one member to parliament, and Bervie, the only royal burgh, is part of the Montrose group of parliamentary burghs. Kincardine is combined into one sheriffdom with the counties of Aberdeen and Banff, and one of the Aberdeen sheriffs-substitutes works in Stonehaven. The county is governed by a school board. The academy in Stonehaven and a few public schools receive funding for higher education. The county council transfers the “residue” grant to the county secondary education committee, which uses it for technical education grants. In Blairs, in the northeast of the county near the Dee, there is a Roman Catholic college for training young men for the priesthood.
History.—The annals of Kincardineshire as a whole are almost blank. The county belonged of old to the district of Pictavia and apparently was overrun for a brief period by the Romans. In the parish of Fetteresso are the remains of the camp of Raedykes, in which, according to tradition, the Caledonians under Galgacus were lodged before their battle with Agricola. It is also alleged that in the same district Malcolm I. was killed (954) whilst endeavouring to reduce the unruly tribes of this region. Mearns, the alternative name for the county, is believed to have been derived from Mernia, a Scottish king, to whom the land was granted, and whose brother, Angus, had obtained the adjoining shire of Forfar. The antiquities consist mostly of stone circles, cairns, tumuli, standing stones and a structure in the parish of Dunnottar vaguely known as a “Picts’ kiln.” By an extraordinary reversion of fortune the town which gave the shire its name has practically vanished. It stood about 2 m. N.E. of Fettercairn, and by the end of the 16th century had declined to a mere hamlet, being represented now only by 802 the ruins of the royal castle and an ancient burial-ground. The Bruces, earls of Elgin, also bear the title of earl of Kincardine.
History.—The history of Kincardineshire is mostly empty. The county used to be part of the area known as Pictavia and was briefly occupied by the Romans. In the parish of Fetteresso, there are remnants of the camp at Raedykes, where, according to legend, the Caledonians led by Galgacus stayed before their battle with Agricola. It's also said that Malcolm I was killed here in 954 while trying to bring order to the rebellious tribes of the area. Mearns, another name for the county, is thought to have originated from Mernia, a Scottish king to whom the land was granted, and whose brother, Angus, received the neighboring shire of Forfar. The ancient sites mainly include stone circles, cairns, burial mounds, standing stones, and a structure in the parish of Dunnottar that is vaguely referred to as a “Picts’ kiln.” In an ironic twist of fate, the town that gave the shire its name has nearly disappeared. It was located about 2 miles northeast of Fettercairn and had become a small village by the end of the 16th century, now represented only by 802 the ruins of the royal castle and an old burial ground. The Bruces, earls of Elgin, also hold the title of earl of Kincardine.
See A. Jervise, History and Traditions of the Lands of the Lindsays (1853), History and Antiquities of the Mearns (1858), Memorials of Angus and the Mearns (1861); J. Anderson, The Black Book of Kincardineshire (Stonehaven, 1879); C. A. Mollyson, The Parish of Fordoun (Aberdeen, 1893); A. C. Cameron, The History of Fettercairn (Paisley, 1899).
See A. Jervise, History and Traditions of the Lands of the Lindsays (1853), History and Antiquities of the Mearns (1858), Memorials of Angus and the Mearns (1861); J. Anderson, The Black Book of Kincardineshire (Stonehaven, 1879); C. A. Mollyson, The Parish of Fordoun (Aberdeen, 1893); A. C. Cameron, The History of Fettercairn (Paisley, 1899).

KINCHINJUNGA, or Kanchanjanga, the third (or second; see K2) highest mountain in the world. It is a peak of the eastern Himalayas, situated on the boundary between Sikkim and Nepal, with an elevation of 28,146 ft. Kinchinjunga is best seen from the Indian hill-station of Darjeeling, where the view of this stupendous mountain, dominating all intervening ranges and rising from regions of tropical undergrowth to the altitude of eternal snows, is one of the grandest in the world.
KINCHINJUNGA, or Kangchenjunga, is the third (or second; see K2) highest mountain in the world. It’s a peak in the eastern Himalayas, located on the border between Sikkim and Nepal, with an elevation of 28,146 ft. Kinchinjunga is best viewed from the Indian hill station of Darjeeling, where the sight of this magnificent mountain, towering over all the surrounding ranges and rising from areas of tropical vegetation to the heights of eternal snow, is one of the most breathtaking in the world.

KIND (O.E. ge-cynde, from the same root as is seen in “kin,” supra), a word in origin meaning birth, nature, or as an adjective, natural. From the application of the term to the natural disposition or characteristic which marks the class to which an object belongs, the general and most common meaning of “class,” genus or species easily develops; that of race, natural order or group, is particularly seen in such expressions as “mankind.” The phrase “payment in kind,” i.e. in goods or produce as distinguished from money, is used as equivalent to the Latin in specie; in ecclesiastical usage “communion in both kinds” or “in one kind” refers to the elements of bread and wine (Lat. species) in the Eucharist. The present main sense of the adjective “kind,” i.e. gentle, friendly, benevolent, has developed from the meaning “born,” “natural,” through “of good birth, disposition or nature,” “naturally well-disposed.”
KIND (O.E. ge-cynde, from the same root as “kin,” supra), originally meant birth or nature, and as an adjective, it means natural. The term's application to the natural traits or characteristics that define a class leads to the most common meaning of “class,” genus, or species; this also includes race, natural order, or group, evident in phrases like “mankind.” The term “payment in kind,” i.e. in goods or produce instead of money, is similar to the Latin in specie; in religious terms, “communion in both kinds” or “in one kind” refers to the elements of bread and wine (Lat. species) in the Eucharist. The current main meaning of the adjective “kind,” i.e. gentle, friendly, or benevolent, has evolved from the meanings of “born,” “natural,” to “of good birth, disposition, or nature,” and “naturally well-disposed.”

KINDERGARTEN, a German word meaning “garden of children,” the name given by Friedrich Froebel to a kind of “play-school” invented by him for furthering the physical, moral and intellectual growth of children between the ages of three and seven. For the theories on which this type of school was based see Froebel. Towards the end of the 18th century Pestalozzi planned, and Oberlin formed, day-asylums for young children. Schools of this kind took in the Netherlands the name of “play school,” and in England, where they have especially thriven, of “infant schools” (q.v.). But Froebel’s idea of the “Kindergarten” differed essentially from that of the infant schools. The child required to be prepared for society by being early associated with its equals; and young children thus brought together might have their employments, especially their chief employment, play, so organized as to draw out their capacities of feeling and thinking, and even of inventing and creating.
KINDERGARTEN, a German term meaning “garden of children,” was named by Friedrich Froebel for a type of “play-school” he created to promote the physical, moral, and intellectual development of children aged three to seven. For the theories behind this type of school, see Froebel. Towards the end of the 18th century, Pestalozzi planned, and Oberlin established, day-care facilities for young children. In the Netherlands, these schools were called “play schools,” while in England, where they flourished particularly, they were known as “infant schools” (q.v.). However, Froebel's concept of “Kindergarten” was fundamentally different from that of infant schools. He believed that children needed to be prepared for society by interacting with their peers; thus, young children brought together in this setting could have their activities, especially their primary activity—play—structured in a way that encouraged their emotional and intellectual growth, as well as their ability to invent and create.
Froebel therefore invented a course of occupations, most of which are social games. Many of the games are connected with the “gifts,” as he called the simple playthings provided for the children. These “gifts” are, in order, six coloured balls, a wooden ball, a cylinder and a cube, a cube cut to form eight smaller cubes, another cube cut to form eight parallelograms, square and triangular tablets of coloured wood, and strips of lath, rings and circles for pattern-making. In modern kindergartens much stress has been laid on such occupations as sand-drawing, modelling in clay and paper, pattern-making, plaiting, &c. The artistic faculty was much thought of by Froebel, and, as in the education of the ancients, the sense of rhythm in sound and motion was cultivated by music and poetry introduced in the games. Much care was to be given to the training of the senses, especially those of sight, sound and touch. Intuition or first-hand experience (Anschauung) was to be recognized as the true basis of knowledge, and though stories were to be told, instruction of the imparting and “learning-up” kind was to be excluded. Froebel sought to teach the children not what to think but how to think, in this following in the steps of Pestalozzi, who had done for the child what Bacon nearly two hundred years before had done for the philosopher. Where possible the children were to be much in the open air, and were each to cultivate a little garden.
Froebel therefore created a curriculum of activities, most of which are social games. Many of these games are linked to the “gifts,” as he called the simple toys provided for the children. These “gifts” include six colored balls, a wooden ball, a cylinder and a cube, a cube divided into eight smaller cubes, another cube divided into eight parallelograms, square and triangular wooden tablets in different colors, and strips of wood, rings, and circles for pattern-making. In modern kindergartens, there's a strong emphasis on activities like sand drawing, modeling with clay and paper, pattern-making, braiding, etc. Froebel placed great importance on artistic skills, and, like in the education of the ancients, the sense of rhythm in sound and movement was developed through music and poetry introduced in the games. Significant attention was given to training the senses, especially sight, sound, and touch. Intuition or first-hand experience (Anschauung) was to be recognized as the true foundation of knowledge, and although stories were to be told, direct instruction and rote learning were to be avoided. Froebel aimed to teach children not what to think but how to think, following in the footsteps of Pestalozzi, who had done for children what Bacon had done for philosophers nearly two hundred years earlier. Whenever possible, children were to spend significant time outdoors and each was to cultivate a small garden.
The first kindergarten was opened at Blankenburg, near Rudolstadt, in 1837, but after a needy existence of eight years was closed for want of funds. In 1851 the Prussian government declared that “schools founded on Froebel’s principles or principles like them could not be allowed.” As early as 1854 it was introduced into England, and Henry Barnard reported on it that it was “by far the most original, attractive and philosophical form of infant development the world has yet seen” (Report to Governor of Connecticut, 1854). The great propagandist of Froebelism, the Baroness Berta von Marenholtz-Bülow (1811-1893), drew the attention of the French to the kindergarten from the year 1855, and Michelet declared that Froebel had “solved the problem of human education.” In Italy the kindergarten was introduced by Madame Salis-Schwabe. In Austria it is recognized and regulated by the government, though the Volks-Kindergärten are not numerous. But by far the greatest developments of the kindergarten system are in the United States and in Belgium. The movement was begun in the United States by Miss Elizabeth Peabody in 1867, aided by Mrs Horace Mann and Dr Henry Barnard. The first permanent kindergarten was established in St Louis in 1873 by Miss Susan Blow and Dr W. T. Harris. In Belgium the mistresses of the “Écoles gardiennes” are instructed in the “idea of the kindergarten” and “Froebel’s method,” and in 1880 the minister of public instruction issued a programme for the “Écoles Gardiennes Communales,” which is both in fact and in profession a kindergarten manual.
The first kindergarten opened in Blankenburg, near Rudolstadt, in 1837, but after struggling for eight years, it closed due to lack of funds. In 1851, the Prussian government stated that “schools based on Froebel’s principles or similar ones could not be allowed.” By 1854, it was introduced in England, and Henry Barnard noted that it was “by far the most original, attractive, and philosophical form of infant development the world has yet seen” (Report to Governor of Connecticut, 1854). The main advocate for Froebelism, Baroness Berta von Marenholtz-Bülow (1811-1893), drew attention to the kindergarten in France starting in 1855, and Michelet claimed that Froebel had “solved the problem of human education.” In Italy, the kindergarten was brought in by Madame Salis-Schwabe. In Austria, it is recognized and regulated by the government, although the Volks-Kindergärten are not very common. However, the most significant developments of the kindergarten system are found in the United States and Belgium. The movement in the U.S. began with Miss Elizabeth Peabody in 1867, supported by Mrs. Horace Mann and Dr. Henry Barnard. The first permanent kindergarten was established in St. Louis in 1873 by Miss Susan Blow and Dr. W. T. Harris. In Belgium, the teachers of the “Écoles gardiennes” are trained in the “idea of the kindergarten” and “Froebel’s method,” and in 1880, the Minister of Public Instruction issued a program for the “Écoles Gardiennes Communales,” which functions both as a kindergarten manual and in practice.
For the position of the kindergarten system in the principal countries of the world see Report of a Consultative Committee upon the School Attendance of Children below the Age of Five, English Board of Education Reports (Cd. 4259, 1908); and “The Kindergarten,” by Laura Fisher, Report of the United States Commissioner for Education for 1903, vol. i. ch. xvi. (Washington, 1905).
For information on the kindergarten system in major countries worldwide, refer to Report of a Consultative Committee upon the School Attendance of Children below the Age of Five, English Board of Education Reports (Cd. 4259, 1908); and “The Kindergarten,” by Laura Fisher, Report of the United States Commissioner for Education for 1903, vol. i. ch. xvi. (Washington, 1905).

KINDĪ [Abū Yūsuf Ya’qūb ibn Ishāq ul-Kindī, sometimes called pre-eminently “The Philosopher of the Arabs”] flourished in the 9th century, the exact dates of his birth and death being unknown. He was born in Kufa, where his father was governor under the Caliphs Mahdi and Harun al-Rashīd. His studies were made in Baṣra and Bagdad, and in the latter place he remained, occupying according to some a government position. In the orthodox reaction under Motawakkil, when all philosophy was suspect, his library was confiscated, but he himself seems to have escaped. His writings—like those of other Arabian philosophers—are encyclopaedic and are concerned with most of the sciences; they are said to have numbered over two hundred, but fewer than twenty are extant. Some of these were known in the middle ages, for Kindī is placed by Roger Bacon in the first rank after Ptolemy as a writer on optics. His work De Somniorum Visione was translated by Gerard of Cremona (q.v.) and another was published as De medicinarum compositarum gradibus investigandis Libellus (Strassburg, 1531). He was one of the earliest translators and commentators of Aristotle, but like Fārābī (q.v.) appears to have been superseded by Avicenna.
KINDĪ [Abū Yūsuf Ya’qūb ibn Ishāq al-Kindī, often regarded as “The Philosopher of the Arabs”] thrived in the 9th century, with the exact dates of his birth and death being unknown. He was born in Kufa, where his father served as governor under the Caliphs Mahdi and Harun al-Rashīd. He studied in Baṣra and Baghdad, and he stayed in Baghdad, where he held a government position, according to some sources. During the orthodox backlash under Motawakkil, when all philosophy faced suspicion, his library was seized, but he himself seemed to have avoided trouble. His writings—like those of other Arab philosophers—are extensive and cover most areas of science; they are said to total over two hundred, but fewer than twenty still exist today. Some of these works were known in the medieval period, as Roger Bacon ranked Kindī just after Ptolemy in the field of optics. His work De Somniorum Visione was translated by Gerard of Cremona (q.v.), and another was published as De medicinarum compositarum gradibus investigandis Libellus (Strassburg, 1531). He was one of the earliest translators and commentators on Aristotle, but like Fārābī (q.v.), he seems to have been overshadowed by Avicenna.
See G. Flügel, Al Kindi genannt der Philosoph der Araber (Leipzig, 1857), and T. J. de Boer, Geschichte der Philosophie im Islam (Stuttgart, 1901), pp. 90 sqq.; also Arabian Philosophy.
See G. Flügel, Al Kindi called the Philosopher of the Arabs (Leipzig, 1857), and T. J. de Boer, History of Philosophy in Islam (Stuttgart, 1901), pp. 90 and following; also Arabian Philosophy.

KINEMATICS (from Gr. κίνημα, a motion), the branch of mechanics which discusses the phenomena of motion without reference to force or mass (see Mechanics).
KINEMATICS (from Gr. movement, meaning motion), is the area of mechanics that studies the characteristics of motion without considering the forces or mass involved (see Mechanics).

KINETICS (from Gr. κινεῖν, to move), the branch of mechanics which discusses the phenomena of motion as affected by force; it is the modern equivalent of dynamics in the restricted sense (see Mechanics).
KINETICS (from Gr. κινεῖν, to move) is the part of mechanics that looks at how motion is influenced by force; it’s the modern version of dynamics in a more specific sense (see Mechanics).

KING, CHARLES WILLIAM (1818-1888), English writer on ancient gems, was born at Newport (Mon.) on the 5th of September 1818. He entered Trinity College, Cambridge, in 1836; graduated in 1840, and obtained a fellowship in 1842; he was senior fellow at the time of his death in London on the 25th of March 1888. He took holy orders, but never held any cure. He spent much time in Italy, where he laid the foundation of his collection of gems, which, increased by subsequent purchases in London, was sold by him in consequence of his failing eyesight and was presented in 1881 to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. King was recognized universally as one of the greatest authorities in this department of art. His chief works on the subject are: Antique Gems, their Origin, Uses and Value (1860), a complete and exhaustive treatise; The Gnostics and their Remains (2nd ed. by J. Jacobs, 1887, which 803 led to an animated correspondence in the Athenaeum); The Natural History of Precious Stones and Gems and of the Precious Metals (1865); The Handbook of Engraved Gems (2nd ed., 1885); Early Christian Numismatics (1873). King was thoroughly familiar with the works of Greek and Latin authors, especially Pausanias and the elder Pliny, which bore upon the subject in which he was most interested; but he had little taste for the minutiae of verbal criticism. In 1869 he brought out an edition of Horace, illustrated from antique gems; he also translated Plutarch’s Moralia (1882) and the theosophical works of the Emperor Julian (1888) for Bonn’s Classical Library.
KING, CHARLES WILLIAM (1818-1888), English writer on ancient gems, was born in Newport (Mon.) on September 5, 1818. He started at Trinity College, Cambridge, in 1836, graduated in 1840, and earned a fellowship in 1842; he was a senior fellow at the time of his death in London on March 25, 1888. He was ordained but never held any church position. He spent a lot of time in Italy, where he began his collection of gems, which he expanded with later purchases in London but sold due to his failing eyesight. This collection was presented to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York in 1881. King was widely recognized as one of the leading experts in this art field. His major works include: Antique Gems, their Origin, Uses and Value (1860), a thorough and comprehensive treatise; The Gnostics and their Remains (2nd ed. by J. Jacobs, 1887), which sparked lively correspondence in the Athenaeum; The Natural History of Precious Stones and Gems and of the Precious Metals (1865); The Handbook of Engraved Gems (2nd ed., 1885); Early Christian Numismatics (1873). King was well-versed in the works of Greek and Latin authors, especially Pausanias and the elder Pliny, which were related to his main interests; however, he had little interest in the finer points of verbal criticism. In 1869, he published an edition of Horace, illustrated with antique gems; he also translated Plutarch’s Moralia (1882) and the theosophical works of Emperor Julian (1888) for Bonn’s Classical Library.

KING, CLARENCE (1842-1901), American geologist, was born at Newport, Rhode Island, U.S.A., on the 6th of January 1842. He graduated at Yale in 1862. His most important work was the geological exploration of the fortieth parallel, of which the main reports (1876 and 1877) comprised the geological and topographical atlas of the Rocky Mountains, the Green River and Utah basins, and the Nevada plateau and basin. When the United States Geological Survey was consolidated in 1879 King was chosen director, and he vigorously conducted investigations in Colorado, and in the Eureka district and on the Comstock lode in Nevada. He held office for a year only; in later years his only noteworthy contribution to geology was an essay on the age of the earth, which appeared in the annual report of the Smithsonian Institution for 1893. He died at Phoenix, Arizona, on the 24th of December 1901.
KING, CLARENCE (1842-1901), American geologist, was born in Newport, Rhode Island, U.S.A., on January 6, 1842. He graduated from Yale in 1862. His most significant work was the geological exploration of the fortieth parallel, with the main reports (1876 and 1877) including the geological and topographical atlas of the Rocky Mountains, the Green River and Utah basins, and the Nevada plateau and basin. When the United States Geological Survey was consolidated in 1879, King was appointed director, and he actively conducted research in Colorado, the Eureka district, and the Comstock lode in Nevada. He served for only a year; in his later years, his only major contribution to geology was an essay on the age of the earth, which was published in the annual report of the Smithsonian Institution for 1893. He passed away in Phoenix, Arizona, on December 24, 1901.

KING, EDWARD (1612-1637), the subject of Milton’s Lycidas, was born in Ireland in 1612, the son of Sir John King, a member of a Yorkshire family which had migrated to Ireland. Edward King was admitted a pensioner of Christ’s College, Cambridge, on the 9th of June 1626, and four years later was elected a fellow. Milton, though two years his senior and himself anxious to secure a fellowship, remained throughout on terms of the closest friendship with his rival, whose amiable character seems to have endeared him to the whole college. King served from 1633 to 1634 as praelector and tutor of his college, and was to have entered the church. His career, however, was cut short by the tragedy which inspired Milton’s verse. In 1637 he set out for Ireland to visit his family, but on the 10th of August the ship in which he was sailing struck on a rock near the Welsh coast, and King was drowned. Of his own writings many Latin poems contributed to different collections of Cambridge verse survive, but they are not of sufficient merit to explain the esteem in which he was held.
KING, EDWARD (1612-1637), the subject of Milton’s Lycidas, was born in Ireland in 1612 to Sir John King, a member of a Yorkshire family that had moved to Ireland. Edward King became a pensioner at Christ’s College, Cambridge, on June 9, 1626, and four years later he was elected a fellow. Milton, who was two years older and himself eager to secure a fellowship, maintained a close friendship with his rival, whose pleasant nature endeared him to the entire college. King served as praelector and tutor at his college from 1633 to 1634 and was planning to enter the church. However, his life was tragically cut short, which inspired Milton’s poetry. In 1637, he set out for Ireland to visit his family, but on August 10, the ship he was on struck a rock near the Welsh coast, and he drowned. He left behind several Latin poems included in various collections of Cambridge verse, but they don't have enough merit to explain the high regard in which he was held.
A collection of Latin, Greek and English verse written in his memory by his Cambridge friends was printed at Cambridge in 1638, with the title Justa Edouardo King naufrago ab amicis moerentibus amoris et μνείας χάριν. The second part of this collection has a separate title-page, Obsequies to the Memorie of Mr Edward King, Anno Dom. 1638, and contains thirteen English poems, of which Lycidas1 (signed J. M.) is the last.
A collection of Latin, Greek, and English poems written in his memory by his Cambridge friends was published in Cambridge in 1638, titled Justa Edouardo King naufrago ab amicis moerentibus amoris et For the sake of remembrance. The second part of this collection has a separate title page, Obsequies to the Memorie of Mr Edward King, Anno Dom. 1638, and includes thirteen English poems, with Lycidas1 (signed J. M.) being the last.
1 J. W. Hales, in the Athenaeum for the 1st of August 1891, suggests that in writing King’s elegy Milton had in his mind, besides the idylls of Theocritus, a Latin eclogue of Giovanni Baptista Amalteo entitled Lycidas, in which Lycidas bids farewell to the land he loves and prays for gentle breezes on his voyage. He was familiar with the Italian Latin poets of the Renaissance, and he may also have been influenced in his choice of the name by the shepherd Lycidas in Sannazaro’s eclogue Phillis.
1 J. W. Hales, in the Athenaeum on August 1, 1891, suggests that when Milton was writing King’s elegy, he was inspired not only by the idyllic works of Theocritus but also by a Latin eclogue by Giovanni Baptista Amalteo called Lycidas, where Lycidas says goodbye to his beloved land and hopes for gentle winds on his journey. He was familiar with the Italian Latin poets from the Renaissance, and he might have also been influenced in choosing the name by the shepherd Lycidas in Sannazaro’s eclogue Phillis.

KING, EDWARD (1829-1910), English bishop, was the second son of the Rev. Walter King, archdeacon of Rochester and rector of Stone, Kent. Graduating from Oriel College, Oxford, he was ordained in 1854, and four years later became chaplain and lecturer at Cuddesdon Theological College. He was principal at Cuddesdon from 1863 to 1873, when he became regius professor of pastoral theology at Oxford and canon of Christ Church. To the world outside he was only known at this time as one of Dr Pusey’s most intimate friends and as a leading member of the English Church Union. But in Oxford, and especially among the younger men, he exercised an exceptional influence, due, not to special profundity of intellect, but to his remarkable charm in personal intercourse, and his abounding sincerity and goodness. In 1885 Dr King was made bishop of Lincoln. The most eventful episode of his episcopate was his prosecution (1888-1890) for ritualistic practices before the archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Benson, and, on appeal, before the judicial committee of the Privy Council (see Lincoln Judgment). Dr King, who loyally conformed his practices to the archbishop’s judgment, devoted himself unsparingly to the work of his diocese; and, irrespective of his High Church views, he won the affection and reverence of all classes by his real saintliness of character. The bishop, who never married, died at Lincoln on the 8th of March 1910.
KING, EDWARD (1829-1910), an English bishop, was the second son of Rev. Walter King, the archdeacon of Rochester and rector of Stone, Kent. After graduating from Oriel College, Oxford, he was ordained in 1854, and four years later became a chaplain and lecturer at Cuddesdon Theological College. He served as principal at Cuddesdon from 1863 to 1873, when he took on the role of regius professor of pastoral theology at Oxford and canon of Christ Church. At that time, he was mainly known outside as a close friend of Dr. Pusey and a key member of the English Church Union. However, in Oxford, especially among the younger generation, he had a significant impact, not due to any deep intellectual prowess, but rather because of his extraordinary charm in personal interactions, along with his genuine sincerity and kindness. In 1885, Dr. King was appointed bishop of Lincoln. The most notable event during his time as bishop was his prosecution (1888-1890) for ritualistic practices by the archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Benson, and later, on appeal, before the judicial committee of the Privy Council (see Lincoln Judgment). Dr. King, who faithfully followed the archbishop’s ruling, dedicated himself fully to the work of his diocese; despite his High Church beliefs, he gained the love and respect of people from all walks of life because of his genuine goodness. The bishop, who never married, passed away in Lincoln on March 8, 1910.
See the obituary notice in The Times, March 9, 1910.
See the obituary notice in The Times, March 9, 1910.

KING, HENRY (1591-1669), English bishop and poet, eldest son of John King, afterwards bishop of London, was baptized on the 16th of January 1591. With his younger brother John he proceeded from Westminster School to Christ Church, Oxford, where both matriculated on the 20th of January 1609. Henry King entered the church, and after receiving various ecclesiastical preferments he was made bishop of Chichester in 1642, receiving at the same time the rich living of Petworth, Sussex. On the 29th of December of that year Chichester surrendered to the Parliamentary army, and King was among the prisoners. After his release he found an asylum with his brother-in-law, Sir Richard Hobart of Langley, Buckinghamshire, and afterwards at Richkings near by, with Lady Salter, said to have been a sister of Dr Brian Duppa (1588-1662). King was a close friend of Duppa and personally acquainted with Charles I. In one of his poems dated 1649 he speaks of the Eikon Basilike as the king’s own work. Restored to his benefice at the Restoration, King died at Chichester on the 30th of September 1669. His works include Poems, Elegies, Paradoxes and Sonets (1657), The Psalmes of David from the New Translation of the Bible, turned into Meter (1651), and several sermons. He was one of the executors of John Donne, and prefixed an elegy to the 1663 edition of his friend’s poems.
KING, HENRY (1591-1669), an English bishop and poet, was the eldest son of John King, who later became the bishop of London. He was baptized on January 16, 1591. Along with his younger brother John, he moved from Westminster School to Christ Church, Oxford, where they both enrolled on January 20, 1609. Henry King joined the church and, after receiving various ecclesiastical positions, became the bishop of Chichester in 1642, acquiring the wealthy living of Petworth, Sussex, at the same time. On December 29 that year, Chichester fell to the Parliamentary army, and King was taken prisoner. After his release, he found refuge with his brother-in-law, Sir Richard Hobart of Langley, Buckinghamshire, and later at Richkings nearby, with Lady Salter, who was said to be a sister of Dr. Brian Duppa (1588-1662). King was a close friend of Duppa and had personal connections with Charles I. In one of his poems from 1649, he refers to the Eikon Basilike as the king’s own creation. After the Restoration, he regained his position and passed away in Chichester on September 30, 1669. His works include Poems, Elegies, Paradoxes and Sonets (1657), The Psalmes of David from the New Translation of the Bible, turned into Meter (1651), and several sermons. He was one of the executors of John Donne and wrote an elegy for the 1663 edition of his friend’s poems.
King’s Poems and Psalms were edited, with a biographical sketch, by the Rev. J. Hannah (1843).
King’s Poems and Psalms were edited, along with a biography, by Rev. J. Hannah (1843).

KING, RUFUS (1755-1827), American political leader, was born on the 24th of March 1755 at Scarborough, Maine, then a part of Massachusetts. He graduated at Harvard in 1777, read law at Newburyport, Mass., with Theophilus Parsons, and was admitted to the bar in 1780. He served in the Massachusetts General Court in 1783-1784 and in the Confederation Congress in 1784-1787. During these critical years he adopted the “states’ rights” attitude. It was largely through his efforts that the General Court in 1784 rejected the amendment to the Articles of Confederation authorizing Congress to levy a 5% impost. He was one of the three Massachusetts delegates in Congress in 1785 who refused to present the resolution of the General Court proposing a convention to amend the articles. He was also out of sympathy with the meeting at Annapolis in 1786. He did good service, however, in opposing the extension of slavery. Early in 1787 King was moved by the Shays Rebellion and by the influence of Alexander Hamilton to take a broader view of the general situation, and it was he who introduced the resolution in Congress, on the 21st of February 1787, sanctioning the call for the Philadelphia constitutional convention. In the convention he supported the large-state party, favoured a strong executive, advocated the suppression of the slave trade, and opposed the counting of slaves in determining the apportionment of representatives. In 1788 he was one of the most influential members of the Massachusetts convention which ratified the Federal Constitution. He married Mary Alsop (1769-1819) of New York in 1786 and removed to that city in 1788. He was elected a member of the New York Assembly in the spring of 1789, and at a special session of the legislature held in July of that year was chosen one of the first representatives of New York in the United States Senate. In this body he served in 1789-1796, supported Hamilton’s financial measures, Washington’s neutrality proclamation and the Jay Treaty, and became one of the recognized leaders of the Federalist party. He was minister to Great Britain in 1796-1803 and again in 1825-1826, and was the Federalist candidate for vice-president in 1804 and 1808, and for president in 1816, when he 804 received 34 electoral votes to 183 cast for Monroe. He was again returned to the Senate in 1813, and was re-elected in 1819 as the result of a struggle between the Van Buren and Clinton factions of the Democratic-Republican party. In the Missouri Compromise debates he supported the anti-slavery programme in the main, but for constitutional reasons voted against the second clause of the Tallmadge Amendment providing that all slaves born in the state after its admission into the Union should be free at the age of twenty-five years. He died at Jamaica, Long Island, on the 29th of April 1827.
KING, RUFUS (1755-1827), American political leader, was born on March 24, 1755, in Scarborough, Maine, which was then part of Massachusetts. He graduated from Harvard in 1777, studied law in Newburyport, Massachusetts, with Theophilus Parsons, and was admitted to the bar in 1780. He served in the Massachusetts General Court from 1783 to 1784 and in the Confederation Congress from 1784 to 1787. During these crucial years, he adopted a "states’ rights" stance. It was largely due to his efforts that the General Court in 1784 rejected the amendment to the Articles of Confederation that would have allowed Congress to impose a 5% tax. He was one of the three Massachusetts delegates in Congress in 1785 who refused to present the General Court's resolution proposing a convention to amend the articles. He also disagreed with the meeting at Annapolis in 1786. However, he played an important role in opposing the expansion of slavery. In early 1787, influenced by Shays' Rebellion and Alexander Hamilton, King began to view the broader situation and introduced the resolution in Congress on February 21, 1787, calling for the Philadelphia constitutional convention. At the convention, he supported the large-state faction, favored a strong executive, advocated for the abolition of the slave trade, and opposed counting slaves for determining the representation. In 1788, he was one of the most influential members of the Massachusetts convention that ratified the Federal Constitution. He married Mary Alsop (1769-1819) of New York in 1786 and moved to that city in 1788. He was elected to the New York Assembly in the spring of 1789, and during a special session of the legislature in July of that year, he was chosen as one of the first representatives of New York in the United States Senate. He served in the Senate from 1789 to 1796, supported Hamilton’s financial policies, Washington’s neutrality proclamation, and the Jay Treaty, and became a recognized leader of the Federalist party. He was the minister to Great Britain from 1796 to 1803 and again from 1825 to 1826, and was the Federalist candidate for vice president in 1804 and 1808, and for president in 1816, when he received 34 electoral votes compared to 183 for Monroe. He returned to the Senate in 1813 and was re-elected in 1819 following a struggle between the Van Buren and Clinton factions of the Democratic-Republican party. In the Missouri Compromise debates, he primarily supported the anti-slavery agenda, but for constitutional reasons, he voted against the second clause of the Tallmadge Amendment, which stated that all slaves born in the state after its admission to the Union would be free at age twenty-five. He died on April 29, 1827, in Jamaica, Long Island.
The Life and Correspondence of Rufus King, begun about 1850 by his son, Charles King, was completed by his grandson, Charles R. King, and published in six volumes (New York, 1894-1900).
The Life and Correspondence of Rufus King, started around 1850 by his son, Charles King, was finished by his grandson, Charles R. King, and published in six volumes (New York, 1894-1900).
Rufus King’s son, John Alsop King (1788-1867), was educated at Harrow and in Paris, served in the war of 1812 as a lieutenant of a cavalry company, and was a member of the New York Assembly in 1819-1821 and of the New York Senate in 1823. When his father was sent as minister to Great Britain in 1825 he accompanied him as secretary of the American legation, and when his father returned home on account of ill health he remained as chargé d’affaires until August 1826. He was a member of the New York Assembly again in 1832 and in 1840, was a Whig representative in Congress in 1849-1851, and in 1857-1859 was governor of New York State. He was a prominent member of the Republican party, and in 1861 was a delegate to the Peace Conference in Washington.
Rufus King’s son, John Alsop King (1788-1867), was educated at Harrow and in Paris. He served in the War of 1812 as a lieutenant in a cavalry unit and was a member of the New York Assembly from 1819 to 1821, and of the New York Senate in 1823. When his father was appointed minister to Great Britain in 1825, he went with him as secretary of the American legation. After his father returned home due to health issues, he stayed on as chargé d’affaires until August 1826. He rejoined the New York Assembly in 1832 and 1840, served as a Whig representative in Congress from 1849 to 1851, and was the governor of New York State from 1857 to 1859. He was a key member of the Republican Party and in 1861, he was a delegate to the Peace Conference in Washington.
Another son, Charles King (1789-1867), was also educated abroad, was captain of a volunteer regiment in the early part of the war of 1812, and served in 1814 in the New York Assembly, and after working for some years as a journalist was president of Columbia College in 1849-1864.
Another son, Charles King (1789-1867), was educated overseas, served as captain of a volunteer regiment early in the War of 1812, and was a member of the New York Assembly in 1814. After working as a journalist for several years, he became president of Columbia College from 1849 to 1864.
A third son, James Gore King (1791-1853), was an assistant adjutant-general in the war of 1812, was a banker in Liverpool and afterwards in New York, and was president of the New York & Erie railroad until 1837, when by his visit to London he secured the loan to American bankers of £1,000,000 from the governors of the Bank of England. In 1849-1851 he was a representative in Congress from New Jersey.
A third son, James Gore King (1791-1853), served as an assistant adjutant-general in the War of 1812, worked as a banker in Liverpool and later in New York, and was the president of the New York & Erie Railroad until 1837, when he traveled to London and secured a loan of £1,000,000 from the governors of the Bank of England for American bankers. From 1849 to 1851, he was a representative in Congress for New Jersey.
Charles King’s son, Rufus King (1814-1876), graduated at the U.S. Military Academy in 1833, served for three years in the engineer corps, and, after resigning from the army, became assistant engineer of the New York & Erie railroad. He was adjutant-general of New York state in 1839-1843, and became a brigadier-general of volunteers in the Union army in 1861, commanded a division in Virginia in 1862-1863, and, being compelled by ill health to resign from the army, was U.S. minister to the Papal States in 1863-1867.
Charles King's son, Rufus King (1814-1876), graduated from the U.S. Military Academy in 1833, served three years in the engineer corps, and after leaving the army, became the assistant engineer for the New York & Erie railroad. He was the adjutant-general of New York state from 1839 to 1843, and in 1861 he became a brigadier-general of volunteers in the Union army. He commanded a division in Virginia from 1862 to 1863, and due to health issues, he had to resign from the army. He then served as the U.S. minister to the Papal States from 1863 to 1867.
His son, Charles King (b. 1844), served in the artillery until 1870 and in the cavalry until 1879; he was appointed brigadier-general U.S. Volunteers in the Spanish War in 1898, and served in the Philippines. He wrote Famous and Decisive Battles (1884), Campaigning with Crook (1890), and many popular romances of military life.
His son, Charles King (b. 1844), served in the artillery until 1870 and in the cavalry until 1879. He was appointed brigadier-general in the U.S. Volunteers during the Spanish War in 1898 and served in the Philippines. He wrote Famous and Decisive Battles (1884), Campaigning with Crook (1890), and many popular stories about military life.

KING, THOMAS (1730-1805), English actor and dramatist, was born in London on the 20th of August 1730. Garrick saw him when appearing as a strolling player in a booth at Windsor, and engaged him for Drury Lane. He made his first appearance there in 1748 as the Herald in King Lear. He played the part of Allworth in the first presentation of Massinger’s New Way to Pay Old Debts (1748), and during the summer he played Romeo and other leading parts in Bristol. For eight years he was the leading comedy actor at the Smock Alley theatre in Dublin, but in 1759 he returned to Drury Lane and took leading parts until 1802. One of his earliest successes was as Lord Ogleby in The Clandestine Marriage (1766), which was compared to Garrick’s Hamlet and Kemble’s Coriolanus, but he reached the climax of his reputation when he created the part of Sir Peter Teazle at the first representation of The School for Scandal (1777). He was the author of a number of farces, and part-owner and manager of several theatres, but his fondness for gambling brought him to poverty. He died on the 11th of December 1805.
KING, THOMAS (1730-1805), English actor and playwright, was born in London on August 20, 1730. Garrick noticed him while he was performing as a traveling actor in a booth at Windsor and hired him for Drury Lane. He made his debut there in 1748 as the Herald in King Lear. He played Allworth in the first performance of Massinger’s New Way to Pay Old Debts (1748), and during the summer, he starred as Romeo and took on other prominent roles in Bristol. For eight years, he was the lead comedy actor at the Smock Alley theatre in Dublin, but in 1759 he returned to Drury Lane and took on leading roles until 1802. One of his earliest successes was as Lord Ogleby in The Clandestine Marriage (1766), which was compared to Garrick’s Hamlet and Kemble’s Coriolanus, but he reached the peak of his fame when he originated the role of Sir Peter Teazle in the first performance of The School for Scandal (1777). He wrote several farces and was a part-owner and manager of various theaters, but his love for gambling led him to financial ruin. He died on December 11, 1805.

KING, WILLIAM (1650-1729), Anglican divine, the son of James King, an Aberdeen man who migrated to Antrim, was born in May 1650. He was educated at Trinity College, Dublin, and after being presented to the parish of St Werburgh, Dublin, in 1679, became dean of St Patrick’s in 1689, bishop of Derry in 1691, and archbishop of Dublin in 1702. In 1718 he founded the divinity lectureship in Trinity College, Dublin, which bears his name. He died in May 1729. King was the author of The State of the Protestants in Ireland under King James’s Government (1691), but is best known by his De Origine Mali (1702; Eng. trans., 1731), an essay deemed worthy of a reply by Bayle and Leibnitz. King was a strong supporter of the Revolution, and his voluminous correspondence is a valuable help to our knowledge of the Ireland of his day.
KING, WILLIAM (1650-1729), Anglican divine, the son of James King, who was from Aberdeen and moved to Antrim, was born in May 1650. He studied at Trinity College, Dublin, and after being appointed to the parish of St Werburgh, Dublin, in 1679, he became dean of St Patrick’s in 1689, bishop of Derry in 1691, and archbishop of Dublin in 1702. In 1718, he established the divinity lectureship at Trinity College, Dublin, which is named after him. He died in May 1729. King wrote The State of the Protestants in Ireland under King James’s Government (1691), but he is best known for his De Origine Mali (1702; Eng. trans., 1731), an essay that received responses from Bayle and Leibnitz. King strongly supported the Revolution, and his extensive correspondence is a valuable resource for understanding Ireland during his time.
See A Great Archbishop of Dublin, William King, D.D., edited by Sir C. S. King, Bart. (1908).
See A Great Archbishop of Dublin, William King, D.D., edited by Sir C. S. King, Bart. (1908).

KING, WILLIAM (1663-1712), English poet and miscellaneous writer, son of Ezekiel King, was born in 1663. From his father he inherited a small estate and he was connected with the Hyde family. He was educated at Westminster School under Dr Busby, and at Christ Church, Oxford (B.A. 1685; D.C.L. 1692). His first literary enterprise was a defence of Wycliffe, written in conjunction with Sir Edward Hannes (d. 1710) and entitled Reflections upon Mons. Varillas’s History of Heresy ... (1688). He became known as a humorous writer on the Tory and High Church side. He took part in the controversy aroused by the conversion of the once stubborn non-juror William Sherlock, one of his contributions being an entertaining ballad, “The Battle Royal,” in which the disputants are Sherlock and South. In 1694 he gained the favour of Princess Anne by a defence of her husband’s country entitled Animadversions on the Pretended Account of Denmark, in answer to a depreciatory pamphlet by Robert (afterwards Viscount) Molesworth. For this service he was made secretary to the princess. He supported Charles Boyle in his controversy with Richard Bentley over the genuineness of the Epistles of Phalaris, by a letter (printed in Dr Bentley’s Dissertations ... (1698), more commonly known as Boyle against Bentley), in which he gave an account of the circumstances of Bentley’s interview with the bookseller Bennet. Bentley attacked Dr King in his Dissertation in answer (1699) to this book, and King replied with a second letter to his friend Boyle. He further satirized Bentley in ten Dialogues of the Dead relating to ... the Epistles of Phalaris (1699). In 1700 he published The Transactioneer, with some of his Philosophical Fancies, in two Dialogues, ridiculing the credulity of Hans Sloane, who was then the secretary of the Royal Society. This was followed up later with some burlesque Useful Transactions in Philosophy (1709). By an able defence of his friend, James Annesley, 5th earl of Anglesey, in a suit brought against him by his wife before the House of Lords in 1701, he gained a legal reputation which he did nothing further to advance. He was sent to Ireland in 1701 to be judge of the high court of admiralty, and later became sole commissioner of the prizes, keeper of the records in the Bermingham Tower of Dublin Castle, and vicar-general to the primate. About 1708 he returned to London. He served the Tory cause by writing for The Examiner before it was taken up by Swift. He wrote four pamphlets in support of Sacheverell, in the most considerable of which, “A Vindication of the Rev. Dr Henry Sacheverell ... in a Dialogue between a Tory and a Whig” (1711), he had the assistance of Charles Lambe of Christ Church and of Sacheverell himself. In December 1711 Swift obtained for King the office of gazetteer, worth from £200 to £250. King was now very poor, but he had no taste for work, and he resigned his office on the 1st of July 1712. He died on the 25th of December in the same year.
KING, WILLIAM (1663-1712), English poet and writer, was born in 1663 to Ezekiel King. He inherited a small estate from his father and had ties to the Hyde family. He attended Westminster School under Dr. Busby and graduated from Christ Church, Oxford (B.A. 1685; D.C.L. 1692). His first literary work was a defense of Wycliffe, co-written with Sir Edward Hannes (d. 1710), called Reflections upon Mons. Varillas’s History of Heresy ... (1688). He gained recognition as a humorous writer supporting the Tory and High Church perspectives. He participated in the debate sparked by the conversion of the previously steadfast non-juror William Sherlock, contributing an entertaining ballad titled “The Battle Royal,” featuring Sherlock and South as the main characters. In 1694, he won the favor of Princess Anne with a defense of her husband's country, Animadversions on the Pretended Account of Denmark, responding to a critical pamphlet by Robert (later Viscount) Molesworth. For this, he was appointed secretary to the princess. He backed Charles Boyle in his dispute with Richard Bentley regarding the authenticity of the Epistles of Phalaris, writing a letter (published in Dr Bentley’s Dissertations ... (1698), better known as Boyle against Bentley), where he detailed Bentley's meeting with bookseller Bennet. Bentley retaliated against Dr. King in his Dissertation response (1699) to this book, prompting King to write a second letter to Boyle. He further mocked Bentley in ten Dialogues of the Dead relating to ... the Epistles of Phalaris (1699). In 1700, he released The Transactioneer, with some of his Philosophical Fancies, in two Dialogues, which mocked the naivety of Hans Sloane, the secretary of the Royal Society at the time. This was followed by burlesque Useful Transactions in Philosophy (1709). By successfully defending his friend, James Annesley, 5th Earl of Anglesey, in a lawsuit brought against him by his wife before the House of Lords in 1701, he gained a legal reputation that he did not pursue further. In 1701, he was sent to Ireland to serve as judge of the high court of admiralty, later becoming sole commissioner of the prizes, keeper of the records in the Bermingham Tower of Dublin Castle, and vicar-general to the primate. Around 1708, he returned to London. He supported the Tory cause by writing for The Examiner before Swift took it over. He wrote four pamphlets in defense of Sacheverell, the most significant being “A Vindication of the Rev. Dr Henry Sacheverell ... in a Dialogue between a Tory and a Whig” (1711), assisted by Charles Lambe of Christ Church and Sacheverell himself. In December 1711, Swift secured the position of gazetteer for King, which paid between £200 and £250. King was very poor at this time but had no inclination for work, resigning from his post on July 1, 1712. He passed away on December 25 of the same year.
The other works of William King include: A Journey to London, in the year 1698. After the Ingenious Method of that made by Dr Martin Lister to Paris, in the same Year ... (1699), which was considered by the author to be his best work; Adversaria, or Occasional Remarks on Men and Manners, a selection from his critical note-book, which shows wide and varied reading; Rufinus, or An Historical Essay on the Favourite Ministry (1712), a satire on the duke of Marlborough. His chief poems are: The Art of Cookery: in imitation of Horace’s 805 Art of Poetry. With some Letters to Dr Lister and Others (1708), one of his most amusing works; The Art of Love; in imitation of Ovid ... (1709); “Mully of Mountoun,” and a burlesque “Orpheus and Eurydice.” A volume of Miscellanies in Prose and Verse appeared in 1705; his Remains ... were edited by J. Brown in 1732; and in 1776 John Nichols produced an excellent edition of his Original Works ... with Historical Notes and Memoirs of the Author. Dr Johnson included him in his Lives of the Poets, and his works appear in subsequent collections.
The other works of William King include: A Journey to London, in the year 1698. After the Clever Method that was used by Dr. Martin Lister to Paris, in the same Year ... (1699), which the author considered to be his best work; Adversaria, or Occasional Remarks on Men and Manners, a selection from his critical notebook, showcasing extensive and varied reading; Rufinus, or An Historical Essay on the Favourite Ministry (1712), a satire on the duke of Marlborough. His major poems are: The Art of Cookery: in imitation of Horace’s 805 Art of Poetry. With some Letters to Dr. Lister and Others (1708), one of his most entertaining works; The Art of Love; in imitation of Ovid ... (1709); “Mully of Mountoun,” and a humorous take on “Orpheus and Eurydice.” A collection of Miscellanies in Prose and Verse was published in 1705; his Remains ... were edited by J. Brown in 1732; and in 1776, John Nichols produced an excellent edition of his Original Works ... with Historical Notes and Memoirs of the Author. Dr. Johnson included him in his Lives of the Poets, and his works are included in later collections.
King is not to be confused with another William King (1685-1763), author of a mock-heroic poem called The Toast (1736) satirizing the countess of Newburgh, and principal of St Mary Hall, Oxford.
King is not to be mistaken for another William King (1685-1763), who wrote a mock-heroic poem called The Toast (1736) that satirizes the Countess of Newburgh and was the principal of St Mary Hall, Oxford.

KING [OF OCKHAM], PETER KING, 1st Baron (1669-1734), lord chancellor of England, was born at Exeter in 1669. In his youth he was interested in early church history, and published anonymously in 1691 An Enquiry into the Constitution, Discipline, Unity and Worship of the Primitive Church that flourished within the first Three Hundred Years after Christ. This treatise engaged the interest of his cousin, John Locke, the philosopher, by whose advice his father sent him to the university of Leiden, where he stayed for nearly three years. He entered the Middle Temple in 1694 and was called to the bar in 1698. In 1700 he was returned to parliament for Beer Alston in Devonshire; he was appointed recorder of Glastonbury in 1705 and recorder of London in 1708. He was chief justice of the common pleas from 1714 to 1725, when he was appointed speaker of the House of Lords and was raised to the peerage. In June of the same year he was made lord chancellor, holding office until compelled by a paralytic stroke to resign in 1733. He died at Ockham, Surrey, on the 22nd of July 1734. Lord King as chancellor failed to sustain the reputation which he had acquired at the common law bar. Nevertheless he left his mark on English law by establishing the principles that a will of immovable property is governed by the lex loci rei sitae, and that where a husband had a legal right to the personal estate of his wife, which must be asserted by a suit in equity, the court would not help him unless he made a provision out of the property for the wife, if she required it. He was also the author of the Act (4 Geo. II. c. 26) by virtue of which English superseded Latin as the language of the courts. Lord King published in 1702 a History of the Apostles’ Creed (Leipzig, 1706; Basel, 1750) which went through several editions and was also translated into Latin.
KING [OF OCKHAM], PETER KING, 1st Lord (1669-1734), lord chancellor of England, was born in Exeter in 1669. In his youth, he was interested in early church history and published anonymously in 1691 An Enquiry into the Constitution, Discipline, Unity and Worship of the Primitive Church that flourished within the first Three Hundred Years after Christ. This work captured the attention of his cousin, John Locke, the philosopher, who advised his father to send him to the University of Leiden, where he studied for nearly three years. He joined the Middle Temple in 1694 and became a barrister in 1698. In 1700, he was elected to Parliament for Beer Alston in Devonshire; he was appointed recorder of Glastonbury in 1705 and recorder of London in 1708. He served as chief justice of the common pleas from 1714 to 1725, when he became speaker of the House of Lords and was elevated to the peerage. In June of the same year, he was appointed lord chancellor, holding the position until he had to resign due to a stroke in 1733. He died at Ockham, Surrey, on July 22, 1734. As chancellor, Lord King did not maintain the reputation he had built at the common law bar. Nevertheless, he influenced English law by establishing the principles that the will of immovable property is governed by the lex loci rei sitae, and that when a husband had a legal right to his wife's personal estate, the court would not assist him unless he made provisions for his wife from that property if she needed it. He was also the author of the Act (4 Geo. II. c. 26), which replaced Latin with English as the language of the courts. Lord King published a History of the Apostles’ Creed in 1702 (Leipzig, 1706; Basel, 1750), which went through several editions and was also translated into Latin.
His great-great-grandson, William (1805-1893), married in 1835 the only daughter of Lord Byron the poet, and was created earl of Lovelace in 1838. Another descendant, Peter John Locke King (1811-1885), who was member of parliament for East Surrey from 1847 to 1874, won some fame as an advocate of reform, being responsible for the passing of the Real Estate Charges Act of 1854, and for the repeal of a large number of obsolete laws.
His great-great-grandson, William (1805-1893), married in 1835 the only daughter of poet Lord Byron and became the Earl of Lovelace in 1838. Another descendant, Peter John Locke King (1811-1885), served as a member of parliament for East Surrey from 1847 to 1874 and gained some recognition as a reform advocate, helping to pass the Real Estate Charges Act of 1854 and overseeing the repeal of many outdated laws.

KING (O. Eng. cyning, abbreviated into cyng, cing; cf. O. H. G. chun- kuning, chun- kunig, M.H.G. künic, künec, künc, Mod. Ger. König, O. Norse konungr, kongr, Swed. konung, kung), a title, in its actual use generally implying sovereignty of the most exalted rank. Any inclusive definition of the word “king” is, however, impossible. It always implies sovereignty, but in no special degree or sense; e.g. the sovereigns of the British Empire and of Servia are both kings, and so too, at least in popular parlance, are the chiefs of many barbarous peoples, e.g. the Zulus. The use of the title is, in fact, involved in considerable confusion, largely the result of historic causes. Freeman, indeed, in his Comparative Politics (p. 138) says: “There is a common idea of kingship which is at once recognized however hard it may be to define it. This is shown among other things by the fact that no difficulty is ever felt as to translating the word king and the words which answer to it in other languages.” This, however, is subject to considerable modification. “King,” for instance, is used to translate the Homeric ἄναξ equally with the Athenian βασιλεύς or the Roman rex. Yet the Homeric “kings” were but tribal chiefs; while the Athenian and Roman kings were kings in something more than the modern sense, as supreme priests as well as supreme rulers and lawgivers (see Archon; and Rome: History). In the English Bible, too, the title of king is given indiscriminately to the great king of Persia and to potentates who were little more than Oriental sheiks. A more practical difficulty, moreover, presented itself in international intercourse, before diplomatic conventions became, in the 19th century, more or less stereotyped. Originally the title of king was superior to that of emperor, and it was to avoid the assumption of the superior title of rex that the chief magistrates of Rome adopted the names of Caesar, imperator and princeps to signalize their authority. But with the development of the Roman imperial idea the title emperor came to mean more than had been involved in that of rex; very early in the history of the Empire there were subject kings; while with the Hellenizing of the East Roman Empire its rulers assumed the style of βασιλεύς, no longer to be translated “king” but “emperor.” From this Roman conception of the supremacy of the emperor the medieval Empire of the West inherited its traditions. With the barbarian invasions the Teutonic idea of kingship had come into touch with the Roman idea of empire and with the theocratic conceptions which this had absorbed from the old Roman and Oriental views of kingship. With these the Teutonic kingship had in its origin but little in common.
KING (Old English cyning, shortened to cyng, cing; compare Old High German chun- kuning, chun- kunig, Middle High German künic, künec, künc, Modern German König, Old Norse konungr, kongr, Swedish konung, kung), is a title that generally suggests the highest level of sovereignty. However, it’s impossible to create a single all-encompassing definition for the word “king.” It always indicates sovereignty, but not in any specific way; for example, the rulers of the British Empire and Serbia are both termed kings, and among many tribal societies, like the Zulus, the same title applies in everyday language. The use of this title is actually quite confusing, largely due to historical reasons. Freeman, in his Comparative Politics (p. 138), notes: “There is a common idea of kingship that is immediately recognized, even though it’s hard to define. This is evident, among other things, because translating the term king and its equivalents in other languages is never difficult.” However, this idea requires some clarification. The term “king” is used to translate the Homeric king just as it is for the Athenian king or the Roman rex. Yet, the Homeric “kings” were merely tribal leaders, while Athenian and Roman kings had greater roles, serving as both high priests and ultimate rulers and lawmakers (see Archon; and Rome: History). Additionally, in the English Bible, the title king is applied indiscriminately to the great king of Persia and to local leaders who were essentially Eastern sheikhs. A more practical challenge emerged in international relations before the 19th century, when diplomatic protocols became fairly standardized. Initially, the title of king was considered superior to that of emperor, and to avoid taking on the superior title of rex, the leading officials of Rome chose the names Caesar, imperator, and princeps to signify their authority. However, as the Roman imperial concept evolved, the title emperor came to encompass more than what was associated with rex; very early in the Empire's history there were subordinate kings, while as the Eastern Roman Empire became influenced by Hellenistic culture, its rulers adopted the title of king, which ceased to be translated as “king” and instead meant “emperor.” The Western medieval Empire inherited its traditions from this Roman view of the emperor's supremacy. During the barbarian invasions, the Teutonic concept of kingship interacted with the Roman notion of empire and the theocratic ideas it had absorbed from ancient Roman and Eastern interpretations of kingship, having little in common with the original concept of Teutonic kingship.
Etymologically the Romance and Teutonic words for king have quite distinct origins. The Latin rex corresponds to the Sanskrit rajah, and meant originally steersman. The Teutonic king on the contrary corresponds to the Sanskrit ganaka, and “simply meant father, the father of a family, the king of his own kin, the father of a clan, the father of a people.”1 The Teutonic kingship, in short, was national; the king was the supreme representative of the people, “hedged with divinity” in so far as he was the reputed descendant of the national gods, but with none of that absolute theocratic authority associated with the titles of rex or βασιλεύς. This, however, was modified by contact with Rome and Christianity. The early Teutonic conquerors had never lost their reverence for the Roman emperor, and were from time to time proud to acknowledge their inferiority by accepting titles, such as “patrician,” by which this was implied. But by the coronation of Charles, king of the Franks, as emperor of the West, the German kingship was absorbed into the Roman imperial idea, a process which exercised a profound effect on the evolution of the Teutonic kingship generally. In the symmetrical political theory of medieval Europe pope and emperor were sun and moon, kings but lesser satellites; though the theory only partially and occasionally corresponded with the facts. But the elevation of Charlemagne had had a profound effect in modifying the status of kingship in nations that never came under his sceptre nor under that of his successors. The shadowy claim of the emperors to universal dominion was in theory everywhere acknowledged; but independent kings hastened to assert their own dignity by surrounding themselves with the ceremonial forms of the Empire and occasionally, as in the case of the Saxon bretwaldas in England, by assuming the imperial style. The mere fact of this usurpation showed that the title of king was regarded as inferior to that of emperor; and so it continued, as a matter of sentiment at least, down to the end of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806 and the cheapening of the imperial title by its multiplication in the 19th century. To the 806 last, moreover, the emperor retained the prerogative of creating kings, as in the case of the king of Prussia in 1701, a right borrowed and freely used by the emperor Napoleon. Since 1814 the title of king has been assumed or bestowed by a consensus of the Powers; e.g. the elector of Hanover was made king by the congress of Vienna (1814), and per contra the title of king was refused to the elector of Hesse by the congress of Aix-la-Chapelle (1818). In general the title of king is now taken to imply a sovereign and independent international position. This was implied in the recognition of the title of king in the rulers of Greece, Rumania, Servia and Bulgaria when these countries were declared absolutely independent of Turkey. The fiction of this independent sovereignty is preserved even in the case of the kings of Bavaria, Saxony and Württemberg, who are technically members of a free confederation of sovereign states, but are not independent, since their relations with foreign Powers are practically controlled by the king of Prussia as German emperor.
Etymologically, the Romance and Teutonic words for "king" come from completely different origins. The Latin rex relates to the Sanskrit rajah, which originally meant "steersman." On the other hand, the Teutonic king corresponds to the Sanskrit ganaka, which "simply meant father—the father of a family, the king of his own kin, the father of a clan, the father of a people." 1 In short, Teutonic kingship was national; the king was the top representative of the people, "surrounded by divinity" as he was believed to be a descendant of the national gods, but without the absolute theocratic authority that the titles of rex or king held. However, this changed with contact with Rome and Christianity. The early Teutonic conquerors had never lost their respect for the Roman emperor and occasionally took pride in acknowledging their inferiority by accepting titles like "patrician," which indicated this. But with the coronation of Charles, king of the Franks, as emperor of the West, the German kingship was absorbed into the Roman imperial concept, deeply influencing the development of Teutonic kingship overall. In the balanced political theory of medieval Europe, the pope and emperor were the sun and moon, while kings were lesser satellites, although this theory only partially and occasionally reflected reality. Nonetheless, the elevation of Charlemagne significantly altered the status of kingship in nations that never came under his rule or that of his successors. The vague claim of the emperors to universal authority was theoretically accepted everywhere, but independent kings quickly asserted their own dignity by surrounding themselves with the ceremonial aspects of the Empire and occasionally, as evidenced by the Saxon bretwaldas in England, by adopting imperial styles. This usurpation demonstrated that the title of king was seen as lesser compared to emperor; this sentiment persisted until the end of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806 and the dilution of the imperial title in the 19th century due to its frequent use. Moreover, the emperor retained the right to create kings, as shown with the king of Prussia in 1701, a power that emperor Napoleon borrowed and utilized. Since 1814, the title of king has been assumed or granted by a consensus of the Powers; for example, the elector of Hanover became king through the congress of Vienna (1814), while the congress of Aix-la-Chapelle (1818) denied the title of king to the elector of Hesse. Generally, the title of king is now understood to imply a sovereign and independent international position. This was evident in the recognition of the title of king for the rulers of Greece, Rumania, Servia, and Bulgaria when these countries were declared fully independent of Turkey. The notion of this independent sovereignty is maintained even for the kings of Bavaria, Saxony, and Württemberg, who are technically members of a free confederation of sovereign states but are not truly independent, as their relations with foreign Powers are largely controlled by the king of Prussia as German emperor.
The theory of the “divine right” of kings, as at present understood, is of comparatively modern growth. The principle that the kingship is “descendible in one sacred family,” as George Canning put it, is not only still Divine Right of Kings. that of the British constitution, as that of all monarchical states, but is practically that of kingship from the beginning. This is, however, quite a different thing from asserting with the modern upholders of the doctrine of “divine right” not only that “legitimate” monarchs derive their authority from, and are responsible to, God alone, but that this authority is by divine ordinance hereditary in a certain order of succession. The power of popular election remained, even though popular choice was by custom or by religious sentiment confined within the limits of a single family. The custom of primogeniture grew up owing to the obvious convenience of a simple rule that should avoid ruinous contests; the so-called “Salic Law” went further, and by excluding females, removed another possible source of weakness. Neither did the Teutonic kingship imply absolute power. The idea of kingship as a theocratic function which played so great a part in the political controversies of the 17th century, is due ultimately to Oriental influences brought to bear through Christianity. The crowning and anointing of the emperors, borrowed from Byzantium and traceable to the influence of the Old Testament, was imitated by lesser potentates; and this “sacring” by ecclesiastical authority gave to the king a character of special sanctity. The Christian king thus became, in a sense, like the Roman rex, both king and priest. Shakespeare makes Richard II. say, “Not all the water in the rough rude sea can wash the balm off from an anointed king” (act iii. sc. 2); and this conception of the kingship tended to gather strength with the weakening of the prestige of the papacy and of the clergy generally. Before the Reformation the anointed king was, within his realm, the accredited vicar of God for secular purposes; after the Reformation he became this in Protestant states for religious purposes also. In England it is not without significance that the sacerdotal vestments, generally discarded by the clergy—dalmatic, alb and stole—continued to be among the insignia of the sovereign (see Coronation). Moreover, this sacrosanct character he acquired not by virtue of his “sacring,” but by hereditary right; the coronation, anointing and vesting were but the outward and visible symbol of a divine grace adherent in the sovereign by virtue of his title. Even Roman Catholic monarchs, like Louis XIV., would never have admitted that their coronation by the archbishop constituted any part of their title to reign; it was no more than the consecration of their title. In England the doctrine of the divine right of kings was developed to its extremest logical conclusions during the political controversies of the 17th century. Of its exponents the most distinguished was Hobbes, the most exaggerated Sir Robert Filmer. It was the main issue to be decided by the Civil War, the royalists holding that “all Christian kings, princes and governors” derive their authority direct from God, the parliamentarians that this authority is the outcome of a contract, actual or implied, between sovereign and people. In one case the king’s power would be unlimited, according to Louis XIV.’s famous saying: “L’état, c’est moi!” or limitable only by his own free act; in the other his actions would be governed by the advice and consent of the people, to whom he would be ultimately responsible. The victory of this latter principle was proclaimed to all the world by the execution of Charles I. The doctrine of divine right, indeed, for a while drew nourishment from the blood of the royal “martyr”; it was the guiding principle of the Anglican Church of the Restoration; but it suffered a rude blow when James II. made it impossible for the clergy to obey both their conscience and their king; and the revolution of 1688 made an end of it as a great political force. These events had effects far beyond England. They served as precedents for the crusade of republican France against kings, and later for the substitution of the democratic kingship of Louis Philippe, “king of the French by the grace of God and the will of the people,” for the “legitimate” kingship of Charles X., “king of France by the grace of God.”
The idea of the "divine right" of kings, as we understand it today, is relatively modern. The belief that kingship is "passed down in one sacred family," as George Canning put it, is still part of the British constitution, just as it is in all monarchies, and has been since kingship began. However, this is different from the modern supporters of the "divine right" who claim that "legitimate" monarchs get their authority from God alone and are accountable to Him alone, and that this authority is divinely mandated to be hereditary in a specific order. The power of popular election still existed, even if the people's choice was traditionally limited by custom or religious belief to a single family. The practice of primogeniture arose because it was a straightforward rule that avoided damaging disputes; the so-called "Salic Law" went further and excluded women to eliminate another potential weakness. Additionally, the concept of Teutonic kingship did not imply absolute power. The idea of kingship as a theocratic role, which was crucial in the political debates of the 17th century, ultimately stemmed from Eastern influences brought into Christianity. The crowning and anointing of emperors, inspired by Byzantium and traceable to the Old Testament, were mimicked by lesser rulers; this "sacring" by religious authority gave the king a special sense of sanctity. Thus, the Christian king became, like the Roman rex, both a king and a priest. Shakespeare has Richard II say, “Not all the water in the rough rude sea can wash the balm off from an anointed king” (act iii. sc. 2); and this conception of kingship gained strength as the prestige of the papacy and the clergy weakened. Before the Reformation, the anointed king was considered the legitimate representative of God for secular issues within his realm; after the Reformation, he became this for religious matters in Protestant states as well. In England, it's noteworthy that the liturgical vestments—dalmatic, alb, and stole—typically abandoned by the clergy remained part of the king's insignia (see Coronation). Furthermore, the king's sacred status was not due to his "sacring," but rather his hereditary right; the coronation, anointing, and vesting were merely symbolic representations of a divine grace inherent in the sovereign because of his title. Even Catholic monarchs like Louis XIV would never have claimed that their coronation by the archbishop was part of their right to reign; it was only the sanctification of their title. In England, the doctrine of the divine right of kings was pushed to its extreme logical limits during the political debates of the 17th century. The key proponents were Hobbes, who was the most notable, and Sir Robert Filmer, who took it to extremes. It became the main issue in the Civil War, with royalists arguing that "all Christian kings, princes and governors" derive their authority directly from God, while parliamentarians contended that this authority emerges from a contract, whether explicit or implicit, between the sovereign and the people. In the first case, the king's power would be unlimited, as Louis XIV famously stated: “L’état, c’est moi!”, or limited only by his own choices; in the other case, his actions would be dictated by the advice and consent of the people, to whom he would ultimately answer. The triumph of this latter principle was dramatically illustrated by the execution of Charles I. The idea of divine right briefly thrived after the royal "martyr's" death and became the core of the Anglican Church during the Restoration, but it received a significant setback when James II made it impossible for clergy to follow both their consciences and their king; the revolution of 1688 effectively ended its influence as a significant political force. These events had repercussions that extended far beyond England, setting precedents for revolutionary France's fight against kings, and later influencing the establishment of Louis Philippe's democratic kingship, "king of the French by the grace of God and the will of the people," in contrast to the "legitimate" kingship of Charles X., "king of France by the grace of God."
The theory of the crown in Britain, as held by descent modified and modifiable by parliamentary action, and yet also “by the grace of God,” is in strict accordance with the earliest traditions of the English kingship; but the rival theory of inalienable divine right is not dead. It is strong in Germany and especially in Prussia; it survives as a militant force among the Carlists in Spain and the Royalists in France (see Legitimists); and even in England a remnant of enthusiasts still maintain the claims of a remote descendant of Charles I. to the throne (see Jacobites).
The theory of the crown in Britain, which is based on hereditary lineage but can be changed by parliamentary decisions, and is also considered to be “by the grace of God,” aligns with the earliest traditions of English kingship. However, the competing idea of an unchangeable divine right is still alive. It is particularly strong in Germany, especially in Prussia, and continues to exist as an active force among the Carlists in Spain and the Royalists in France (see Legitimists); even in England, a small group of supporters still upholds the claims of a distant descendant of Charles I to the throne (see Jacobites).
See J. Neville Figgis, Theory of the Divine Right of Kings (Cambridge, 1896).
See J. Neville Figgis, Theory of the Divine Right of Kings (Cambridge, 1896).
1 Max Müller, Lect. Sci. Lang., 2nd series, p. 255, “All people, save those who fancy that the name king has something to do with a Tartar khan or with a ‘canning’ ... man, are agreed that the English cyning and the Sanskrit ganaka both come from the same root, from that widely spread root whence comes our own cyn or kin and the Greek γένος. The only question is whether there is any connexion between cyning and ganaka closer than that which is implied in their both coming from the same original root. That is to say, are we to suppose that cyning and ganaka are strictly the same word common to Sanskrit and Teutonic, or is it enough to think that cyning is an independent formation made after the Teutons had separated themselves from the common stock? ... The difference between the two derivations is not very remote, as the cyn is the ruling idea in any case; but if we make the word immediately cognate with ganaka we bring in a notion about ‘the father of his people’ which has no place if we simply derive cyning from cyn.” See also O. Schrader, Reallexikon der Indogermanischen Altertumskunde (Strassburg, 1901) s.v. “König”: the chuning (King) is but the chunni (Kin) personified; cf. A.S. léod masc. = “prince”; léod fem. = “race,” i.e. Lat. gens.
1 Max Müller, Lect. Sci. Lang., 2nd series, p. 255, “Everyone, except those who think that the term king relates to a Tartar khan or a ‘canning’ ... man, agrees that the English cyning and the Sanskrit ganaka both originate from the same root, which is widely shared and is the source of our own word cyn or kin, as well as the Greek species. The only question is whether there is any connection between cyning and ganaka beyond the fact that they both derive from the same original root. In other words, should we assume that cyning and ganaka are exactly the same word used in both Sanskrit and Teutonic languages, or is it sufficient to believe that cyning is a distinct formation that emerged after the Teutons separated from the common ancestry? ... The difference between the two origins isn’t far apart, as cyn is the central idea in either case; however, if we consider the word to be directly linked to ganaka, it introduces the concept of ‘the father of his people,’ which is irrelevant if we merely derive cyning from cyn.” See also O. Schrader, Reallexikon der Indogermanischen Altertumskunde (Strassburg, 1901) s.v. “König”: the chuning (King) is just the chunni (Kin) personified; cf. A.S. léod masc. = “prince”; léod fem. = “race,” i.e. Lat. gens.

KING-BIRD, the Lanius tyrannus of Linnaeus, and the Tyrannus carolinensis or T. pipiri of most later writers, a common and characteristic inhabitant of North America, ranging as high as 57° N. lat. or farther, and westward to the Rocky Mountains, beyond which it is found in Oregon, in Washington (State), and in British Columbia, though apparently not occurring in California. In Canada and the northern states of the Union it is a summer visitor, wintering in the south, but also reaching Cuba; and, passing through Central America, it has been found in Bolivia and eastern Peru. Both the scientific and common names of this species are taken from the way in which the cock will at times assume despotic authority over other birds, attacking them furiously as they fly, and forcing them to divert or altogether desist from their course. Yet it is love of his mate or his young that prompts this bellicose behaviour, for it is only in the breeding season that he indulges in it; but then almost every large bird that approaches his nest, from an eagle downwards, is assaulted, and those alone that possess greater command of flight can escape from his repeated charges, which are accompanied by loud and shrill cries. On these occasions it may be that the king-bird displays the emblem of his dignity, which is commonly concealed; for, being otherwise rather plainly coloured—dark-ashy grey above and white beneath—the erectile feathers of the crown of the head, on being parted, form as it were a deep furrow, and reveal their base, which is of a bright golden-orange in front, deepening into scarlet, and then passing into silvery white. This species seems to live entirely on insects, which it captures on the wing; it is in bad repute with bee-keepers,1 though, according to Dr E. Coues, it “destroys a thousand noxious insects for every bee it eats.” It builds, often in an exposed situation, a rather large nest, coarsely constructed outside, but neatly lined with fine roots or grasses, and lays five or six eggs of a pale salmon colour, beautifully marked with blotches and spots of purple, brown and orange, generally disposed in a zone near the larger end.
KING-BIRD, the Lanius tyrannus as classified by Linnaeus, and the Tyrannus carolinensis or T. pipiri according to most later authors, is a common and distinctive bird found in North America. It can be found as far north as 57° N latitude or even farther, and extends westward to the Rocky Mountains. Beyond that, it appears in Oregon, Washington State, and British Columbia, though it doesn’t seem to occur in California. In Canada and the northern U.S. states, it is a summer visitor, migrating south for the winter and even reaching Cuba; it also travels through Central America, having been spotted in Bolivia and eastern Peru. Both its scientific and common names come from the way the male aggressively dominates other birds, attacking them fiercely as they fly and forcing them to change direction or stop. However, this aggressive behavior is driven by its protective instinct for its mate or young; it only displays this during the breeding season. During this time, nearly any large bird that comes near its nest, even an eagle, is attacked, and only those with greater flying ability can escape its repeated charges, which are accompanied by loud and shrill calls. At these times, the king-bird may show off its distinctive feature, which is usually hidden; although it has a generally plain appearance—dark ash-gray above and white below—when the feathers on its head are ruffled, they create a noticeable furrow that reveals a bright golden-orange base at the front, transitioning to scarlet and then silver-white. This bird primarily feeds on insects, catching them in mid-air; it is viewed unfavorably by beekeepers, though according to Dr. E. Coues, it “destroys a thousand noxious insects for every bee it eats.” It constructs a relatively large nest, often in an open location, built coarsely on the outside but neatly lined with fine roots or grasses, and lays five or six eggs that are a pale salmon color, beautifully patterned with purple, brown, and orange blotches and spots, typically arranged in a band near the larger end.
Nearly akin to the king-bird is the petchary or chicheree, so called from its loud and petulant cry, T. dominicensis, or T. griseus, one of the most characteristic and conspicuous birds of the West Indies, and the earliest to give notice of the break of day. In habits, except that it eats a good many berries, it is the very counterpart of its congener, and is possibly even more jealous of any intruder. At all events its pugnacity extends to 807 animals from which it could not possibly receive any harm, and is hardly limited to any season of the year.
Nearly similar to the kingbird is the petchary or chicheree, named for its loud and irritable call, T. dominicensis, or T. griseus, one of the most distinctive and noticeable birds in the West Indies and the first to signal the dawn. Aside from its habit of eating a lot of berries, it mirrors its relative in behavior and may even be more territorial towards any intruder. In any case, its aggressiveness extends to807 animals that pose no threat to it, and this behavior isn't really tied to any particular season.
![]() |
King-Bird. |
In several respects both of these birds, with several of their allies, resemble some of the shrikes; but it must be clearly understood that the likeness is but of analogy, and that there is no near affinity between the two families Laniidae and Tyrannidae, which belong to wholly distinct sections of the great Passerine order; and, while the former is a comparatively homogeneous group, much diversity of form and habits is found among the latter. Similarly many of the smaller Tyrannidae bear some analogy to certain Muscicapidae, with which they were at one time confounded (see Flycatcher), but the difference between them is deep seated.2 Nor is this all, for out of the seventy genera, or thereabouts, into which the Tyrannidae have been divided, comprehending perhaps three hundred and fifty species, all of which are peculiar to the New World, a series of forms can be selected which find a kind of parallel to a series of forms to be found in the other group of Passeres; and the genus Tyrannus, though that from which the family is named, is by no means a fair representative of it; but it would be hard to say which genus should be so accounted. The birds of the genus Muscisaxicola have the habits and almost the appearance of wheat-ears; the genus Alectorurus calls to mind a water-wagtail; Euscarthmus may suggest a titmouse, Elaenia perhaps a willow-wren; but the greatest number of forms have no analogous bird of the Old World with which they can be compared; and, while the combination of delicate beauty and peculiar external form possibly attains its utmost in the long-tailed Milvulus, the glory of the family may be said to culminate in the king of king-birds, Muscivora regia.
In several ways, these birds, along with some of their relatives, are similar to certain shrikes; however, it's important to understand that this resemblance is merely analogical, and there is no close relationship between the two families, Laniidae and Tyrannidae, which belong to completely different sections of the large Passerine order. While the former group is relatively uniform, there is significant variety in form and behavior among the latter. Similarly, many of the smaller Tyrannidae show some similarity to certain Muscicapidae, with which they were once confused (see Flycatcher), but the differences between them are profound.2 On top of this, among the roughly seventy genera into which the Tyrannidae are divided—encompassing about three hundred and fifty species, all native to the New World—there are forms that can be compared to a series of forms found in the other group of Passeres. The genus Tyrannus, after which the family is named, is not necessarily a good representative of it; in fact, it's difficult to determine which genus should be considered as such. The birds in the genus Muscisaxicola have habits and nearly the appearance of wheat-ears; the genus Alectorurus resembles a water-wagtail; Euscarthmus may remind one of a titmouse, and Elaenia might bring to mind a willow-wren. However, most of the forms have no analogous birds in the Old World to compare with; and while the combination of delicate beauty and unique external form is perhaps best exemplified by the long-tailed Milvulus, the peak of the family’s glory can be said to be represented by the king of king-birds, Muscivora regia.
2 Two easy modes of discriminating them externally may be mentioned. All the Laniidae and Muscicapidae have but nine primary quills in their wings, and their tarsi are covered with scales in front only; while in the Tyrannidae there are ten primaries, and the tarsal scales extend the whole way round. The more recondite distinction in the structure of the trachea seems to have been first detected by Macgillivray, who wrote the anatomical descriptions published in 1839 by Audubon (Orn. Biography, v. 421, 422); but its value was not appreciated till the publication of Johannes Müller’s classical treatise on the vocal organs of Passerine birds (Abhandl. k. Akad. Wissensch. Berlin, 1845, pp. 321, 405).
2 Two simple ways to tell them apart externally are worth mentioning. All the Laniidae and Muscicapidae have only nine primary feathers in their wings, and their tarsi are covered with scales only in front; whereas in the Tyrannidae, there are ten primary feathers, and the scales on the tarsi go all the way around. The more complex distinction in the structure of the trachea seems to have been first noticed by Macgillivray, who wrote the anatomical descriptions published in 1839 by Audubon (Orn. Biography, v. 421, 422); however, its significance wasn't recognized until Johannes Müller published his classic work on the vocal organs of Passerine birds (Abhandl. k. Akad. Wissensch. Berlin, 1845, pp. 321, 405).

KING-CRAB, the name given to an Arachnid, belonging to the order Xiphosurae, of the grade Delobranchia or Hydropneustea. King-crabs, of which four, possibly five, existing species are known, were formerly referred to the genus Limulus, a name still applied to them in all zoological textbooks. It has recently been shown, however, that the structural differences between some of the species are sufficiently numerous and important to warrant the recognition of three genera—Xiphosura, of which Limulus is a synonym, Tachypleus and Carcinoscorpius. In Xiphosura the genital operculum structurally resembles the gill-bearing appendages in that the inner branches consist of three distinct segments, the distal of which is lobate and projects freely beyond the margin of the adjacent distal segment of the outer branch; the entosternite (see Arachnida) has two pairs of antero-lateral processes, and in the male only the ambulatory appendages of the second pair are modified as claspers. In Tachypleus and Carcinoscorpius, on the other hand, the genital operculum differs from the gill-bearing appendages in that the inner branches consist of two segments, the distal of which are apically pointed, partially or completely fused in the middle line, and do not project beyond the distal segments of the outer branches; the entosternite has only one pair of antero-lateral processes, and in the male the second and third pairs of ambulatory limbs are modified as claspers. Tachypleus differs from Carcinoscorpius in possessing a long movable spur upon the fourth segment of the sixth ambulatory limb, in having the postanal spine triangular in section instead of round, and the claspers in the male hemichelate, owing to the suppression of the immovable finger, which is well developed in Carcinoscorpius. At the present time king-crabs have a wide but discontinuous distribution. Xiphosura, of which there is but one species, X. polyphemus, ranges along the eastern side of North America from the coast of Maine to Yucatan. Carcinoscorpius, which is also represented by a single species, C. rotundicauda, extends from the Bay of Bengal to the coast of the Moluccas and the Philippines, while of the two better-known species of Tachypleus, T. gigas (= moluccanus) ranges from Singapore to Torres Straits, and T. tridentatus from Borneo to southern Japan. A third species, T. hoeveni, has been recorded from the Moluccas. But although Xiphosura is now so widely sundered geographically from Tachypleus and Carcinoscorpius, the occurrence of the remains of extinct species of king-crabs in Europe, both in Tertiary deposits and in Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous strata, suggests that there was formerly a continuous coast-line, with tropical or temperate conditions, extending from Europe westward to America, and eastward to southern Asia. There are, however, no grounds for the assumption that the supposed coast-line between America and Europe synchronized with that between Europe and south Asia. King-crabs do not appear to differ from each other in habits. Except in the breeding season they live in water ranging in depth from about two to six fathoms, and creep about the bottom or bury themselves in the sand. Their food consists for the most part of soft marine worms, which are picked up in the nippers, thrust into the mouth, and masticated by the basal segments of the appendages between which the mouth lies. At the approach of the breeding season, which in the case of Xiphosura polyphemus is in May, June and July, king-crabs advance in pairs into very shallow water at the time of the high tides, the male holding securely to the back of the female by means of his clasping nippers. No actual union between the sexes takes place, the spawn of the female being fertilized by the male at the time of being laid in the sand or soon afterwards. This act accomplished, the two retreat again into deeper water. Deposited in the mud or sand near high-water mark, the eggs are eventually hatched by the heat of the sun, to which they are exposed every day for a considerable time. The newly hatched young is minute and subcircular in shape, but bears a close resemblance to its parents except in the absence of the caudal spine and in the presence of a fringe of stiff bristles round the margin of the body. During growth it undergoes a succession of moults, making its exit from the old integument through a wide split running round the edge of the carapace. Moulting is effected in exactly the same way in scorpions, Pedipalpi, and normally in spiders. The caudal spine appears at the second moult and gradually increases in length with successive changes of the skin. This organ is of considerable importance, since it enables the king-crab to right itself when overturned by rough water or other causes. Without it the 808 animal would remain helpless like an upturned turtle, because it is unable to reach the ground with its legs when lying on its back. Before the tail is sufficiently developed to be used for that purpose, the young king-crab succeeds in regaining the normal position by flapping its flattened abdominal appendages and rising in the water by that means. The king-crab fishery is an industry of some importance in the United States, and in the East Indies the natives eat the animal and tip their lances and arrows with the caudal spine. They also use the hollow empty shell as a water-ladle or pan—hence the name “pan-fish” or “saucepan-crab” by which the animal is sometimes known. Fossil king-crabs have been recorded from strata of the Tertiary and Secondary epochs, and related but less specialized types of the same order are found in rocks of Palaeozoic age. Of these the most important are Belinurus of the Carboniferous, Protolimulus of the Devonian, and Hemiaspis of the Silurian periods. These ancient forms differ principally from true king-crabs in having the segments of the opisthosoma or hinder half of the body distinctly defined instead of welded into a hexagonal shield.
KING CRAB, the name given to an arachnid, belongs to the order Xiphosurae, within the grade Delobranchia or Hydropneustea. There are known to be four, possibly five, existing species of king-crabs, which were previously classified under the genus Limulus, a name still commonly used in zoological textbooks. However, recent findings indicate that the structural differences between some species are significant enough to recognize three genera: Xiphosura (of which Limulus is a synonym), Tachypleus, and Carcinoscorpius. In Xiphosura, the genital operculum resembles the gill-bearing appendages, as the inner branches are made up of three distinct segments, with the distal segment being lobate and extending beyond the adjacent distal segment of the outer branch; the entosternite (see Arachnida) has two pairs of antero-lateral processes, and in males, only the second pair of ambulatory appendages is adapted as claspers. In contrast, in Tachypleus and Carcinoscorpius, the genital operculum differs from the gill-bearing appendages with inner branches that consist of two segments, the distal of which are pointed at the tip, partially or completely fused in the middle, and do not extend beyond the distal segments of the outer branches; the entosternite has just one pair of antero-lateral processes, and in males, the second and third pairs of ambulatory limbs are modified to be claspers. Tachypleus can be distinguished from Carcinoscorpius by having a long movable spur on the fourth segment of the sixth ambulatory limb, a triangular postanal spine instead of a round one, and hemichelate claspers in males, due to the absence of the immovable finger, which is well-defined in Carcinoscorpius. Currently, king-crabs have a wide but scattered distribution. Xiphosura, represented by only one species, X. polyphemus, ranges along the eastern coast of North America from Maine to Yucatan. Carcinoscorpius, also having one species, C. rotundicauda, extends from the Bay of Bengal to the Moluccas and the Philippines, while two better-known species of Tachypleus, T. gigas (= moluccanus), range from Singapore to Torres Straits, and T. tridentatus from Borneo to southern Japan. A third species, T. hoeveni, has been reported from the Moluccas. Even though Xiphosura is now geographically separated from Tachypleus and Carcinoscorpius, the discovery of extinct king-crab species in Europe in Tertiary deposits as well as Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous layers suggests there once was a continuous coast-line with tropical or temperate conditions stretching from Europe west to America and east to southern Asia. However, there is no evidence to support that the supposed coast-line between America and Europe coincided with that between Europe and South Asia. King-crabs don't seem to differ in their habits. Except during breeding season, they inhabit waters ranging from about two to six fathoms deep, typically crawling along the bottom or burying themselves in the sand. Their diet mainly consists of soft marine worms, which they grab with their pincers, push into their mouths, and chew between the base segments of their appendages surrounding the mouth. As the breeding season approaches, specifically for Xiphosura polyphemus, which occurs in May, June, and July, king-crabs enter very shallow waters in pairs during high tides, with the male securely holding onto the female's back using his clasping pincers. No actual mating occurs, as the female's eggs are fertilized by the male at the moment they are laid in the sand or soon after. Once this process is completed, both retreat back to deeper waters. The eggs, deposited in muddy or sandy areas near the high-water mark, eventually hatch due to exposure to sunlight, which they receive daily for a significant amount of time. The newly hatched young is tiny and circular in shape, closely resembling its parents except for the absence of the caudal spine and the presence of a fringe of stiff bristles around the body's edge. As it grows, it goes through several molts, breaking free from the old exoskeleton through a wide split around the edge of the carapace. The molting process is similar to that of scorpions, Pedipalpi, and normally in spiders. The caudal spine develops during the second molt and gradually lengthens with successive skin changes. This organ is crucial, as it allows the king-crab to right itself if it gets flipped over by rough waters or other factors. Without it, the 808 creature would remain helpless like an upside-down turtle, unable to reach the ground with its legs when on its back. Before the tail is developed enough to help in such situations, the young king-crab can regain its normal position by flapping its flattened abdominal appendages and rising in the water. The king-crab fishery is an important industry in the United States, and in the East Indies, locals consume the animal and use its caudal spine to tip their lances and arrows. They also utilize the empty shell as a ladle or pan—hence the name “pan-fish” or “saucepan-crab” by which the animal is sometimes referred. Fossil king-crabs have been found in Tertiary and Secondary-era strata, with related but less specialized types of the same order present in Palaeozoic rocks. The most notable examples are Belinurus from the Carboniferous period, Protolimulus from the Devonian, and Hemiaspis from the Silurian periods. These ancient forms mainly differ from true king-crabs in that the segments of the opisthosoma or rear part of the body are clearly defined rather than fused into a hexagonal shield.
![]() |
Fig. 1. |
1, Limulus polyphemus, adult (dorsal aspect). 2, Limulus polyphemus, young (dorsal aspect). 3, Prestwichia rotundata, Coal M., Shropshire. 4, Prestwichia Birtwelli, Coal M., Lancashire. 5, Neolimulus falcatus, U. Silurian, Lanark. 6, Hemiaspis limuloides, L. Ludlow, Leintwardine, Shropshire. 7, Pseudoniscus aculeatus, U. Silurian, Russia. |

KINGFISHER (Ger.1 Königsfischer; Walloon Roi-péheux = pêcheur), the Alceḍo ispida of ornithologists, one of the most beautiful and well-known of European birds, being found, though nowhere very abundantly, in every European country, as well as in North Africa and South-Western Asia as far as Sindh. Its blue-green back and rich chestnut breast render it conspicuous as it frequents the streams and ponds whence it procures its food, by plunging almost perpendicularly into the water, and emerging a moment after with the prey—whether a small fish, crustacean, or an aquatic insect—it has captured. In hard frosts it resorts to the sea-shore, but a severe winter is sure to occasion a great mortality in the species, for many of its individuals seem unable to reach the tidal waters where only in such a season they could obtain sustenance; and to this cause rather than any other is perhaps to be ascribed its general scarcity. Very early in the year it prepares its nest, which is at the end of a tunnel bored by itself in a bank, and therein the six or eight white, glossy, translucent eggs are laid, sometimes on the bare soil, but often on the fishbones which, being indigestible, are thrown up in pellets by the birds; and, in any case, before incubation is completed these rejectamenta accumulate so as to form a pretty cup-shaped structure that increases in bulk after the young are hatched, but, mixed with their fluid excretions and with decaying fishes brought for their support, soon becomes a dripping fetid mass.
KINGFISHER (Ger.1 Königsfischer; Walloon Roi-péheux = pêcheur), the Alceḍo ispida of ornithologists, is one of the most beautiful and well-known birds in Europe. It can be found, although not in large numbers, in every European country as well as in North Africa and Southwestern Asia, reaching as far as Sindh. With its blue-green back and rich chestnut breast, it stands out as it frequents streams and ponds where it catches its food. It dives almost straight down into the water and comes up a moment later with a small fish, crustacean, or aquatic insect it has caught. During hard frosts, it moves to the seashore, but severe winters can lead to a significant drop in their population. Many individuals struggle to reach tidal waters where they can find food, which likely contributes to their overall scarcity. Early in the year, it prepares its nest at the end of a tunnel it digs into a bank, where it lays six to eight glossy white eggs, sometimes directly on bare soil but often on fish bones it regurgitates. Before incubation is finished, these rejectamenta pile up to form a cup-shaped structure that grows larger after the young are hatched. However, mixed with their waste and decaying fish brought for their food, it quickly turns into a dripping, foul-smelling mass.
The kingfisher is the subject of a variety of legends and superstitions, both classical and medieval. Of the latter one of the most curious is that having been originally a plain grey bird it acquired its present bright colours by flying towards the sun on its liberation from Noah’s ark, when its upper surface assumed the hue of the sky above it and its lower plumage was scorched by the heat of the setting orb to the tint it now bears.2 More than this, the kingfisher was supposed to possess many virtues. Its dried body would avert thunderbolts, and if kept in a wardrobe would preserve from moths the woollen stuffs therein laid, or hung by a thread to the ceiling of a chamber would point with its bill to the quarter whence the wind blew. All readers of Ovid (Metam., bk. xi.) know how the faithful but unfortunate Ceyx and Alcyone were changed into kingfishers—birds which bred at the winter solstice, when through the influence of Aeolus, the wind-god and father of the fond wife, all gales were hushed and the sea calmed so that their floating nest might ride uninjured over the waves during the seven proverbial “Halcyon days”; while a variant or further development of the fable assigned to the halcyon itself the power of quelling storms.3
The kingfisher is the focus of various legends and superstitions, both from ancient and medieval times. One of the more interesting medieval tales suggests that it was originally a plain gray bird that gained its vibrant colors when it flew towards the sun after being released from Noah’s ark; its upper feathers took on the color of the sky, while its underbelly was burned by the sun's heat, giving it the tint it has today. More than that, people believed the kingfisher had many beneficial qualities. Its dried body could protect against lightning, and if it was kept in a closet, it would guard woolen fabrics from moths. If hung from a thread on the ceiling of a room, it would point its beak in the direction of the wind. All readers of Ovid (Metam., bk. xi.) know how the devoted but unfortunate Ceyx and Alcyone were transformed into kingfishers—birds that nest during the winter solstice when, due to the influence of Aeolus, the wind god and father of the devoted wife, all gales were calmed and the sea smoothed so that their floating nest could safely ride the waves during the seven mythical “Halcyon days.” Additionally, a variation of the story gave the halcyon itself the power to calm storms.
The common kingfisher of Europe is the representative of a well-marked family of birds, the Alcedinidae or Halcyonidae of ornithologists, which is considered by most authorities4 to be closely related to the Bucerotidae (see Hornbill); but the affinity can scarcely be said as yet to be proved. Be that as it may, the present family forms the subject of an important work by Bowdler Sharpe.5 Herein are described one hundred and twenty-five species, nearly all of them being beautifully figured by Keulemans, and that number may be taken even now as approximately correct; for, while the validity of a few has been denied by some eminent men, nearly as many have since been made known, and it seems likely that two or three more described by older writers may yet be rediscovered. These one hundred and twenty-five species Sharpe groups in nineteen genera, and divides into two sub-families, Alcedininae and Daceloninae,6 the one containing five and the other fourteen genera. With existing anatomical materials perhaps no better arrangement could have been made, but the method afterwards published by Sundevall (Tentamen, pp. 95, 96) differs from it not inconsiderably. Here, however, it will be convenient to follow Sharpe. Externally, which is almost all we can at present say, kingfishers present a great uniformity of structure. One of their most remarkable features is the feebleness of their feet, and the union (syndactylism) of the third and fourth digits for the greater part of their length; while, as if still 809 further to show the comparatively functionless character of these members, in two of the genera, Alcyone and Ceyx, the second digit is aborted, and the birds have but three toes. In most forms the bill does not differ much from that of the common Alcedo ispida, but in Syma its edges are serrated, while in Carcineutes, Dacelo and Melidora the maxilla is prolonged, becoming in the last a very pronounced hook. Generally the wings are short and rounded, and the tail is in many forms inconspicuous; but in Tanysiptera, one of the most beautiful groups, the middle pair of feathers is greatly elongated and spatulate, while this genus possesses only ten rectrices, all the rest having twelve. Sundevall relies on a character not noticed by Sharpe, and makes his principal divisions depend on the size of the scapulars, which in one form a mantle, and in the other are so small as not to cover the back. The Alcedinidae are a cosmopolitan family, but only one genus, Ceryle, is found in America, and that extends as well over a great part of the Old World, though not into the Australian region, which affords by far the greater number both of genera and species, having no fewer than ten of the former and fifty-nine of the latter peculiar to it.7
The common kingfisher in Europe represents a distinct family of birds, the Alcedinidae or Halcyonidae according to ornithologists, which most experts consider to be closely related to the Bucerotidae (see Hornbill); however, this connection hasn't been definitively proven yet. Nevertheless, this family is the focus of an important work by Bowdler Sharpe.5 In this work, one hundred and twenty-five species are described, almost all beautifully illustrated by Keulemans, and this number can still be considered roughly accurate today; while a few have been disputed by some prominent figures, just as many new species have been identified since then, and it seems likely that two or three more identified by older authors could be rediscovered. These one hundred and twenty-five species are grouped into nineteen genera by Sharpe, separated into two sub-families, Alcedininae and Daceloninae,6 with the first containing five genera and the second fourteen. Given the available anatomical data, this arrangement may be the best possible, but Sundevall's later method published in Tentamen (pp. 95, 96) differs quite a bit from it. Here, however, it makes sense to follow Sharpe. Externally, which is mostly what we can say for now, kingfishers show a notable uniformity in structure. One of their most striking features is their weak feet and the fusion (syndactylism) of the third and fourth toes for most of their length; furthermore, in two of the genera, Alcyone and Ceyx, the second toe is absent, so these birds have only three toes. In most species, the bill is quite similar to that of the common Alcedo ispida, but in Syma, the edges are serrated, while in Carcineutes, Dacelo, and Melidora, the upper mandible extends, becoming a prominent hook in the latter. Generally, the wings are short and rounded, and in many species, the tail is not very noticeable; however, in Tanysiptera, one of the most stunning groups, the middle pair of feathers is significantly elongated and spatulate, and this genus only has ten tail feathers, while most others have twelve. Sundevall relies on a characteristic that Sharpe overlooked and bases his main divisions on the size of the scapulars, which form a mantle in one type and are so small in the other that they do not cover the back. The Alcedinidae are a worldwide family, but only one genus, Ceryle, can be found in America, which also extends across much of the Old World, though it doesn't reach the Australian region, which has by far the highest number of both genera and species, boasting at least ten genera and fifty-nine unique species.7
In habits kingfishers display considerable diversity, though all, it would seem, have it in common to sit at times motionless on the watch for their prey, and on its appearance to dart upon it, seize it as they fly or dive, and return to a perch where it may be conveniently swallowed. But some species, and especially that which is the type of the family, are not always content to await at rest their victim’s showing itself. They will hover like a hawk over the waters that conceal it, and, in the manner already described, precipitate themselves upon it. This is particularly the way with those that are fishers in fact as well as in name; but no inconsiderable number live almost entirely in forests, feeding on insects, while reptiles furnish the chief sustenance of others. The last is characteristic of at least one Australian form, which manages to thrive in the driest districts of that country, where not a drop of water is to be found for miles, and the air is at times heated to a degree that is insupportable by most animals. The belted kingfisher of North America, Ceryle alcyon, is a characteristic bird of that country, though its habits greatly resemble those of the European species; and the so-called “laughing jackass” of New South Wales and South Australia, Dacelo gigas—with its kindred forms, D. leachi, D. cervina and D. occidentalis, from other parts of the country—deserve special mention. Attention must also be called to the speculations of Dr Bowdler Sharpe (op. cit., pp. xliv.-xlvii.) on the genetic affinity of the various forms of Alcedinidae, and it is to be regretted that hitherto no light has been shed by palaeontologists on this interesting subject, for the only fossil referred to the neighbourhood of the family is the Halcyornis toliapicus of Sir R. Owen (Br. Foss. Mamm. and Birds, p. 554) from the Eocene of Sheppey—the very specimen said to have been previously placed by König (Icon. foss. secliles, fig. 153) in the genus Larus.
Kingfishers show a lot of diversity in their habits, but they all seem to share the common trait of sitting still at times to watch for prey. When they see it, they dart in to catch it, either while flying or diving, and then return to a perch where they can easily swallow it. However, some species, especially the ones that represent the family, aren’t always satisfied just waiting for their victim to show up. They can hover like a hawk over the water that hides their prey and, as previously described, dive down to catch it. This is especially true for those that are actual fishers by nature; but quite a few live mainly in forests, feeding on insects, while others mainly eat reptiles. One notable example is a particular Australian type that thrives in some of the driest areas of the country, where there’s not a drop of water for miles and the heat can reach unbearable levels for most animals. The belted kingfisher of North America, Ceryle alcyon, is a typical bird of that region, although its habits closely resemble those of European species. The so-called “laughing jackass” from New South Wales and South Australia, Dacelo gigas—along with related species like D. leachi, D. cervina, and D. occidentalis—deserve special mention. Additionally, we should note Dr. Bowdler Sharpe’s speculations (op. cit., pp. xliv.-xlvii.) regarding the genetic links among the various types of Alcedinidae, and it’s unfortunate that paleontologists have yet to provide insight on this intriguing topic. The only fossil linked to this family is Halcyornis toliapicus mentioned by Sir R. Owen (Br. Foss. Mamm. and Birds, p. 554) from the Eocene period in Sheppey—this specimen was previously placed by König (Icon. foss. secliles, fig. 153) in the genus Larus.
1 But more commonly called Eisvogel, which finds its counterpart in the Anglo-Saxon Isern or Isen.
1 But more commonly called Kingfisher, which has its equivalent in the Anglo-Saxon Isern or Isen.
3 In many of the islands of the Pacific Ocean the prevalent kingfisher is the object of much veneration.
3 On many islands in the Pacific Ocean, the common kingfisher is highly regarded.
4 Cf. Eyton, Contrib. Ornithology (1850), p. 80; Wallace, Ann. Nat. History, series 2, vol. xviii. pp. 201, 205; and Huxley, Proc. Zool. Society (1867), p. 467.
4 Cf. Eyton, Contrib. Ornithology (1850), p. 80; Wallace, Ann. Nat. History, series 2, vol. xviii. pp. 201, 205; and Huxley, Proc. Zool. Society (1867), p. 467.
5 A Monograph of the Alcedinidae or Family of the Kingfishers, by R. B. Sharpe, 4to (London, 1868-1871). Some important anatomical points were briefly noticed by Professor Cunningham (Proc. Zool. Soc., 1870, p. 280).
5 A Monograph of the Alcedinidae or Family of the Kingfishers, by R. B. Sharpe, 4to (London, 1868-1871). Some key anatomical details were briefly mentioned by Professor Cunningham (Proc. Zool. Soc., 1870, p. 280).
6 The name of this latter sub-family as constituted by Sharpe would seem to be more correctly Ceycinae—the genus Ceyx, founded in 1801 by Lacépède, being the oldest included in it. The word Dacelo, invented by Leach in 1815, is simply an anagram of Alcedo, and, though of course without any etymological meaning, has been very generally adopted.
6 The name of this latter sub-family as defined by Sharpe is more accurately Ceycinae—the genus Ceyx, established in 1801 by Lacépède, being the oldest included in it. The word Dacelo, created by Leach in 1815, is just an anagram of Alcedo, and while it doesn't have any true etymological meaning, it has been widely accepted.

KINGHORN, a royal and police burgh of Fifeshire, Scotland. Pop. (1901), 1550. It is situated on the Firth of Forth, 2¼ m. E. by N. of Burntisland, on the North British railway. The public buildings include a library and town-hall. It enjoys some repute as a summer resort. The leading industries are ship-building, bleaching and the making of flax and glue. At the time of his visit Daniel Defoe found thread-making in vogue, which employed the women while the men were at sea. Alexander III. created Kinghorn a burgh, but his connexion with the town proved fatal to him. As he was riding from Inverkeithing on the 12th of March 1286 he was thrown by his horse and fell over the cliffs, since called King’s Wud End, a little to the west of the burgh, and killed. A monument was erected in 1887 to mark the supposed scene of the accident. The Witch Hill used to be the place of execution of those poor wretches. Kinghorn belongs to the Kirkcaldy district group of parliamentary burghs. At Pettycur, 1 m. to the south, is a good harbour for its size, and at Kinghorn Ness a battery has been established in connexion with the fortifications on Inchkeith. The hill above the battery was purchased by government in 1903 and is used as a point of observation. About 1 m. to the north of Kinghorn is the estate of Grange, which belonged to Sir William Kirkcaldy. Inchkeith, an island in the fairway of the Firth of Forth, 2½ m. S. by E. of Kinghorn and 3½ m. N. by E. of Leith, belongs to the parish of Kinghorn. It has a north-westerly and south-easterly trend, and is nearly 1 m. long and ¼ m. wide. It is a barren rock, on the summit of which stands a lighthouse visible at night for 21 m. In 1881 forts connected by a military road were erected on the northern, western and southern headlands.
KINGHORN, is a royal and police burgh in Fife, Scotland. Population (1901), 1550. It’s located on the Firth of Forth, 2¼ miles east-northeast of Burntisland, along the North British railway. The town features public buildings like a library and a town hall. It has gained some recognition as a summer destination. The main industries include shipbuilding, bleaching, and producing flax and glue. During his visit, Daniel Defoe noted that thread-making was popular, providing work for women while men were at sea. Alexander III designated Kinghorn as a burgh, but his connection to the town turned tragic. On March 12, 1286, while riding from Inverkeithing, he was thrown from his horse and fell over the cliffs—now known as King’s Wud End—just west of the burgh, resulting in his death. A monument was erected in 1887 to commemorate the supposed accident site. Witch Hill was once the execution site for unfortunate souls. Kinghorn is part of the Kirkcaldy district group of parliamentary burghs. At Pettycur Beach, 1 mile south, there is a decent harbor for its size, and at Kinghorn Ness, a battery has been established in connection with the fortifications on Inchkeith. The government purchased the hill above the battery in 1903, and it serves as an observation point. About 1 mile north of Kinghorn is the Grange estate, which once belonged to Sir William Kirkcaldy. Inchkeith, an island in the Firth of Forth, is located 2½ miles southeast of Kinghorn and 3½ miles northeast of Leith, and it’s part of the Kinghorn parish. The island trends northwest and southeast, measuring nearly 1 mile long and ¼ mile wide. It is a barren rock, topped by a lighthouse that is visible at night from 21 miles away. In 1881, forts connected by a military road were built on the northern, western, and southern headlands.

KINGLAKE, ALEXANDER WILLIAM (1800-1891), English historian and traveller, was born at Taunton on the 5th of August 1809. His father, a successful solicitor, intended his son for a legal career. Kinglake went to Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge, where he matriculated in 1828, being a contemporary and friend of Tennyson and Thackeray. After leaving Cambridge he joined Lincoln’s Inn, and was called to the bar in 1837. While still a student he travelled, in 1835, throughout the East, and the impression made upon him by his experiences was so powerful that he was seized with a desire to record them in literature. Eothen, a sensitive and witty record of impressions keenly felt and remembered, was published in 1844, and enjoyed considerable reputation. In 1854 he went to the Crimea, and was present at the battle of the Alma. During the campaign he made the acquaintance of Lord Raglan, who was so much attracted by his talents that he suggested to Kinglake the plan for an elaborate History of the Crimean War, and placed his private papers at the writer’s disposal. For the rest of his life Kinglake was engaged upon the task of completing this monumental history. Thirty-two years elapsed between its commencement and the publication of the last volume, and eight volumes in all appeared at intervals between 1863 and 1887. Kinglake lived principally in London, and sat in parliament for Bridgwater from 1857 until the disfranchisement of the borough in 1868. He died on the 2nd of January 1891. Kinglake’s life-work, The History of the Crimean War, is in scheme and execution too minute and conscientious to be altogether in proportion, but it is a wonderful example of painstaking and talented industry. It is not without errors of partisanship, but it shows remarkable skill in the moulding of vast masses of despatches and technical details into an absorbingly interesting narrative; it is illumined by natural descriptions and character-sketches of great fidelity and acumen; and, despite its length, it remains one of the most picturesque, most vivid and most actual pieces of historical narrative in the English language.
KINGLAKE, ALEXANDER WILLIAM (1800-1891), English historian and traveler, was born in Taunton on August 5, 1809. His father, a successful lawyer, planned for his son to pursue a legal career. Kinglake attended Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge, where he enrolled in 1828, being a contemporary and friend of Tennyson and Thackeray. After leaving Cambridge, he joined Lincoln’s Inn and was called to the bar in 1837. While still a student, he traveled throughout the East in 1835, and the impact of his experiences was so profound that he felt compelled to document them in writing. Eothen, a sensitive and witty account of his impressions, was published in 1844 and gained significant acclaim. In 1854, he went to the Crimea and was present at the Battle of the Alma. During the campaign, he met Lord Raglan, who was so impressed by his abilities that he proposed the idea of a detailed History of the Crimean War and made his private papers available to Kinglake. Kinglake dedicated the rest of his life to completing this monumental history. It took thirty-two years from its start to the publication of the final volume, with eight volumes released at intervals from 1863 to 1887. He primarily lived in London and served as a Member of Parliament for Bridgwater from 1857 until the borough was disenfranchised in 1868. He passed away on January 2, 1891. Kinglake’s life work, The History of the Crimean War, is detailed and meticulously crafted, though it may not always maintain perfect proportion. Nevertheless, it is an impressive example of diligent and talented effort. While it contains some partisan errors, it demonstrates remarkable skill in transforming extensive amounts of reports and technical details into an engaging narrative. It is enhanced by vivid descriptions of nature and character sketches of great accuracy and insight; and despite its length, it remains one of the most picturesque, vivid, and immediate works of historical narrative in the English language.

KINGLET, a name applied in many books to the bird called by Linnaeus Motacilla regulus, and by most modern ornithologists Regulus cristatus, the golden-crested or golden-crowned wren of ordinary persons. This species is the type of a small group which has been generally placed among the Sylviidae or true warblers, but by certain systematists it is referred to the titmouse family, Paridae. That the kinglets possess many of the habits and actions of the latter is undeniable, but on the other hand they are not known to differ in any important points of organization or appearance from the former—the chief distinction being that the nostril is covered by a single bristly feather directed forwards. The golden-crested wren is the smallest of British birds, its whole length being about 3½ in., and its wing measuring only 2 in. from the carpal joint. Generally of an olive-green colour, the top of its head is bright yellow, deepening into orange, and bounded on either side by a black line, while the wing coverts are dull black, and some of them tipped with white, forming a somewhat conspicuous bar. The cock has a pleasant but weak song. The nest is a beautiful object, thickly felted of the softest moss, wool, and spiders’ webs, lined with feathers, and usually built under and near the end of the branch of a yew, fir or cedar, supported by the interweaving of two or three laterally diverging and pendent twigs, and sheltered by the rest. The eggs are from six to ten in number, of a dull white sometimes finely freckled with reddish-brown. The species is particularly social, living for the most part of the 810 year in family parties, and often joining bands of any species of titmouse in a common search for food. Though to be met with in Britain at all seasons, the bird in autumn visits the east coast in enormous flocks, apparently emigrants from Scandinavia, while hundreds perish in crossing the North Sea, where they are well known to the fishermen as “woodcock’s pilots.” A second and more local European species is the fire-crested wren, R. ignicapillus, easily recognizable by the black streak on each side of the head, before and behind the eye, as well as by the deeper colour of its crown. A third species, R. maderensis, inhabits the Madeiras, to which it is peculiar; and examples from the Himalayas and Japan have been differentiated as R. himalayensis and R. japonicus. North America has two well-known species, R. satrapa, very like the European R. ignicapillus, and the ruby-crowned wren, R. calendula, which is remarkable for a loud song that has been compared to that of a canary-bird or a skylark, and for having the characteristic nasal feather in a rudimentary or aborted condition.
KINGLET, is a term used in many books for the bird known scientifically as Motacilla regulus by Linnaeus, and as Regulus cristatus by most modern ornithologists, commonly referred to as the golden-crested or golden-crowned wren. This species represents a small group that is generally classified among the Sylviidae or true warblers, though some taxonomists categorize it within the titmouse family, Paridae. It's undeniable that kinglets share many behaviors and traits with titmice, but they do not differ in any significant organizational or appearance aspects from the warblers—the main difference being that their nostrils are covered by a single bristly feather that points forward. The golden-crested wren is the smallest bird in Britain, measuring about 3½ inches in length, with a wing span of just 2 inches from the carpal joint. Typically olive-green in color, its head is bright yellow, fading to orange, and framed by a black line on either side, while the wing coverts are dull black with some tipped in white, creating a noticeable bar. The male has a pleasant but faint song. The nest is an attractive structure, densely packed with the softest moss, wool, and spider webs, lined with feathers, and usually located under or near the end of a branch of a yew, fir, or cedar, supported by two or three twigs that branch off and droop down, providing shelter from above. The eggs number between six and ten, are dull white, and may have fine reddish-brown freckles. This species is particularly social, typically living in family groups throughout the year and often joining mixed flocks with various titmice while foraging for food. While they can be found in Britain all year round, in the autumn, they migrate in large flocks to the east coast, seemingly from Scandinavia, with many perishing while crossing the North Sea, where fishermen refer to them as “woodcock’s pilots.” A second, more localized European species is the fire-crested wren, R. ignicapillus, distinguishable by the black streaks on either side of its head, both in front of and behind the eye, as well as its darker crown. A third species, R. maderensis, is native to the Madeiras, and there are also varieties identified from the Himalayas and Japan as R. himalayensis and R. japonicus. In North America, there are two well-known species, R. satrapa, which is quite similar to the European R. ignicapillus, and the ruby-crowned wren, R. calendula, known for its loud song that has been likened to that of a canary or skylark, and for having a characteristic nasal feather in a rudimentary or undeveloped state.

KINGS, FIRST AND SECOND BOOKS OF, two books of the Bible, the last of the series of Old Testament histories known as the Earlier or Former Prophets. They were originally reckoned as a single book (Josephus; Origen ap. Eus., H.E. vi. 25; Peshitta; Talmud), though modern Bibles follow the bipartition which is derived from the Septuagint. In that version they are called the third and fourth books of “kingdoms” (βασιλειῶν), the first and second being our books of Samuel. The division into two books is not felicitous, and even the old Hebrew separation between Kings and Samuel must not be taken to mean that the history from the birth of Samuel to the exile was treated by two distinct authors in independent volumes. We cannot speak of the author of Kings or Samuel, but only of an editor or of successive editors whose main work was to arrange in a continuous form extracts or abstracts from earlier sources. The introduction of a chronological scheme and of a series of editorial comments and additions, chiefly designed to enforce the religious meaning of the history, gives a kind of unity to the book of Kings as we now read it; but beneath this we can still distinguish a variety of documents, which, though sometimes mutilated in the process of piecing together, retain sufficient individuality of style and colour to prove their original independence.
BOOKS ONE AND TWO OF KINGS, are two books in the Bible, the last in the series of Old Testament histories known as the Earlier or Former Prophets. They were originally considered a single book (Josephus; Origen ap. Eus., H.E. vi. 25; Peshitta; Talmud), but modern Bibles reflect the split that comes from the Septuagint. In that version, they are referred to as the third and fourth books of “kingdoms” (βασιλειών), with the first and second being our books of Samuel. The division into two books isn’t ideal, and even the old Hebrew distinction between Kings and Samuel shouldn’t be interpreted to mean that the history from Samuel’s birth to the exile was created by two separate authors in independent volumes. We can’t specifically mention the author of Kings or Samuel; instead, we should refer to an editor or a series of editors whose main task was to arrange excerpts or summaries from earlier sources into a continuous narrative. The inclusion of a chronological framework and a series of editorial comments and additions, mainly aimed at highlighting the religious significance of the history, provides a sense of unity to the book of Kings as we read it today. However, beneath this unifying layer, we can still identify a range of documents that, despite being somewhat fragmented during the compilation process, retain enough distinct style and character to indicate their original independence.
Of these documents one of the best defined is the vivid picture of David’s court at Jerusalem (2 Sam. ix.-xx.) from which the first two chapters of 1 Kings manifestly cannot be separated. As it would be unreasonable to suppose that the editor of the history of David closed his work abruptly before the death of the king, breaking off in the middle of a valuable memoir which lay before him, this observation leads us to conclude that the books of Samuel and Kings are not independent histories. They have at least one source in common, and a single editorial hand was at work on both. From an historical point of view, however, the division which makes the beginning of Solomon’s reign the beginning of a new book is very convenient. The conquest of Palestine by the Israelite tribes, recounted in the book of Joshua, leads up to the era of the “judges” (Judg. ii. 6-23; iii. sqq.), and the books of Samuel follow with the institution of the monarchy and the first kings. The books of Kings bring to a close the life of David (c. 975 B.C.), which forms the introduction to the reign of Solomon (1 Kings ii. 12-xi.), the troubles in whose time prepared the way for the separation into the two distinct kingdoms, viz. Judah and the northern tribes of Israel (xii. sqq.). After the fall of Samaria, the history of these Israelites is rounded off with a review (2 Kings xvii.-xviii. 12). The history of the surviving kingdom of Judah is then carried down to the destruction of Jerusalem and the exile (5 and 6), and, after an account of the Chaldean governorship, concludes with the release of the captive king Jehoiachin (561 B.C.) and with an allusion to his kind treatment during the rest of his lifetime.
Of these documents, one of the most clearly defined is the vivid portrayal of David’s court in Jerusalem (2 Sam. ix.-xx.), which the first two chapters of 1 Kings cannot be separated from. It would be unreasonable to assume that the editor of the history of David ended his work abruptly before the king's death, leaving a valuable memoir incomplete. This leads us to conclude that the books of Samuel and Kings are not independent histories. They share at least one common source, and a single editorial team worked on both. From a historical perspective, though, starting the new book with the beginning of Solomon’s reign is quite convenient. The conquest of Palestine by the Israelite tribes, recounted in the book of Joshua, leads up to the time of the “judges” (Judg. ii. 6-23; iii. sqq.), and the books of Samuel then follow with the establishment of the monarchy and the first kings. The books of Kings conclude the life of David (c. 975 B.C.), which serves as the introduction to Solomon's reign (1 Kings ii. 12-xi.), during which troubles arose that led to the division into the two separate kingdoms, Judah and the northern tribes of Israel (xii. sqq.). After the fall of Samaria, the history of these Israelites is summarized (2 Kings xvii.-xviii. 12). The history of the remaining kingdom of Judah is then carried down to the destruction of Jerusalem and the exile (5 and 6), and after detailing the Chaldean governorship, it concludes with the release of captive king Jehoiachin (561 B.C.) and mentions his kind treatment for the rest of his life.
The most noticeable feature in the book is the recurring interest in the centralization of worship in the Temple at Jerusalem as prescribed in Deuteronomy and enforced by Josiah. Amidst the great variety in style and manner which marks the several parts of the history, features which are imbued with the teaching of Deuteronomy recur regularly in similar stereotyped forms. They point in fact to a specific redaction, and thus it would seem that the editor who treated the foundation of the Temple, the central event of Solomon’s life, as a religious epoch of the first importance, regarded this as the beginning of a new era—the history of Israel under the one sanctuary.
The most noticeable feature in the book is the ongoing focus on centralizing worship in the Temple in Jerusalem, as outlined in Deuteronomy and enforced by Josiah. Despite the great variety in style and tone throughout different parts of the history, elements influenced by Deuteronomy appear regularly in similar, fixed forms. They actually indicate a specific editing process, suggesting that the editor who presented the foundation of the Temple, the key event in Solomon’s life, as a major religious milestone viewed it as the start of a new era—the history of Israel centered around one sanctuary.
When we assume that the book of Kings was thrown into its present form by a Deuteronomistic redactor we do not affirm that he was the first who digested the sources of the history into a continuous work, nor must we ascribe Successive Redactions. absolute finality to his work. He gave the book a definite shape and character, but the recognized methods of Hebrew literature left it open to additions and modifications by later hands. Even the redaction in the spirit of Deuteronomy seems itself to have had more than one stage, as Ewald long ago recognized.
When we say that the book of Kings was compiled into its current form by a Deuteronomistic editor, we’re not claiming he was the first to organize the historical sources into a cohesive piece, nor should we attribute absolute finality to his work. He shaped the book and gave it a specific character, but the established practices of Hebrew literature allowed for further additions and changes by later editors. Even the editing process, reflecting the spirit of Deuteronomy, appears to have gone through multiple stages, as Ewald pointed out long ago.
The evidence to be detailed presently shows that there was a certain want of definiteness about the redaction. The mass of disjointed materials, not always free from inconsistencies, which lay before the editor in separate documents or in excerpts already partially arranged by an earlier hand, could not have been reduced to real unity without critical sifting, and an entire recasting of the narrative in a way foreign to the ideas and literary habits of the Hebrews. The unity which the editor aimed at was limited to (a) chronological continuity in the events recorded and (b) a certain uniformity in the treatment of the religious meaning of the narrative. Even this could not be perfectly attained in the circumstances, and the links of the history were not firmly enough riveted to prevent disarrangement or rearrangement of details by later scribes.
The evidence that will be detailed shortly shows that there was a lack of clarity regarding the editing process. The collection of unrelated materials, which sometimes contained inconsistencies, that the editor had to work with in separate documents or excerpts that were already partially organized by someone else, could not have been made into a coherent whole without thorough examination and a complete reworking of the narrative in a way that was different from the ideas and writing styles of the Hebrews. The unity that the editor aimed for was limited to (a) keeping the events in chronological order and (b) maintaining some consistency in how the religious significance of the narrative was presented. Even this goal could not be fully achieved under the circumstances, and the connections in the history were not strong enough to stop later scribes from altering or rearranging details.
(a) The continued efforts of successive redactors can be traced in the chronology of the book. The chronological method of the narrative appears most clearly in the history after Solomon, where the events of each king’s reign are thrown into a kind of stereotyped framework on this type: “In the twentieth year of Jeroboam, king of Israel, Asa began to reign over Judah, and reigned in Jerusalem forty-one years.” ... “In the third year of Asa, king of Judah, Baasha began to reign over Israel in Tirzah twenty-four years.” The history moves between Judah and Israel according to the date of each accession; as soon as a new king has been introduced, everything that happened in his reign is discussed, and wound up by another stereotyped formula as to the death and burial of the sovereign; and to this mechanical arrangement the natural connexion of events is often sacrificed. In this scheme the elaborate synchronisms between contemporary monarchs of the north and south give an aspect of great precision to the chronology. But in reality the data for Judah and Israel do not agree, and remarkable deviations are sometimes found. The key to the chronology is 1 Kings vi. 1, which, as Wellhausen has shown, was not found in the original Septuagint, and contains internal evidence of post-Chaldean date. In fact the system as a whole is necessarily later than 535 B.C., the fixed point from which it counts back, and although the numbers for the duration of the reigns may be based upon early sources, the synchronisms appear to have been inserted at a much later stage in the history of the text.
(a) The ongoing work of various editors can be seen throughout the timeline of the book. The chronological style of the narrative is most evident in the history following Solomon, where the events of each king’s rule are presented in a repetitive format: “In the twentieth year of Jeroboam, king of Israel, Asa began to reign over Judah and ruled in Jerusalem for forty-one years.” ... “In the third year of Asa, king of Judah, Baasha began to reign over Israel in Tirzah for twenty-four years.” The story shifts between Judah and Israel according to the timing of each accession; once a new king is introduced, everything that happened during his reign is covered, wrapping up with a standard formula about the king's death and burial. This method often sacrifices the natural flow of events for a mechanical structure. Within this framework, the detailed synchronizations between the contemporary rulers of the north and south create an impression of high precision in the chronology. However, the information for Judah and Israel often doesn’t match up, leading to some significant discrepancies. The key to the chronology is found in 1 Kings vi. 1, which, as Wellhausen pointed out, was not present in the original Septuagint and shows signs of being written after the Chaldean period. In fact, the entire system must be dated after 535 BCE, the fixed point from which it counts backwards. While the numbers for the lengths of reigns may be based on early sources, the synchronizations appear to have been added much later in the text's history.
(b) Another aspect in the redaction may be called theological. Its characteristic is the retrospective application to the history of a standard belonging to the later developments of Old Testament religion. Thus the redactor regards the sins of Jeroboam as the real cause of the downfall of Israel (2 Kings xvii. 21 seq.), and passes an unfavourable judgment upon all its rulers, not merely to the effect that they did evil in the sight of Yahweh but that they followed in the way of Jeroboam. But his opinion was manifestly not shared by Elijah or Elisha, nor by the original narrator of the lives of these prophets. Moreover, the redactor in 1 Kings iii. 2 seq. regards worship at the high places as sinful after the building of the Temple, although even the best kings before Hezekiah made no attempt to suppress these shrines. This feature in the redaction displays itself not only in occasional comments or homiletical excursuses, but in that part of the narrative in which all ancient historians allowed themselves free scope for the development of their reflections—the speeches placed in the mouths of actors in the history. Here also there is often textual evidence that the theological element is somewhat loosely attached to the earlier narrative and underwent successive additions.
(b) Another aspect of the editing can be called theological. Its main feature is the backward-looking application of a standard from the later developments of Old Testament religion to historical events. For example, the editor sees the sins of Jeroboam as the main reason for the downfall of Israel (2 Kings xvii. 21 seq.) and has a negative view of all its leaders, not just claiming they did evil in the eyes of Yahweh, but that they followed the ways of Jeroboam. However, this view was clearly not shared by Elijah or Elisha, nor by the original storyteller of their lives. Additionally, the editor in 1 Kings iii. 2 seq. considers worship at the high places to be sinful after the Temple was built, even though even the best kings before Hezekiah didn’t try to shut down these shrines. This aspect of the editing shows up not only in occasional comments or homiletical digressions but also in that part of the narrative where all ancient historians allowed themselves the freedom to develop their thoughts—the speeches given to the characters in the story. There is also often textual evidence that the theological element is somewhat loosely connected to the earlier narrative and went through multiple additions.
Consequently it is necessary to distinguish between the older sources and the peculiar setting in which the history has been placed; between earlier records and that specific colouring which, from its affinity to Deuteronomy General Structure. and to other portions of the Old Testament which appear to have been similarly treated under the influence of its teaching, may be conveniently termed “Deuteronomistic.” For 811 his sources the compiler refers chiefly to two distinct works, the “words” or “chronicles” of the kings of Israel and those of the kings of Judah. Precisely how much is copied from these works and how much has been expressed in the compiler’s own language is of course uncertain. It is found on inspection that the present history consists usually of an epitome of each reign. It states the king’s age at succession (so Judah only), length of reign, death and burial, with allusions to his buildings, wars, and other political events.1 In the case of Judah, also, the name of the royal or queen-mother is specifically mentioned. The references to the respective “chronicles,” made as though they were still accessible, are wanting in the case of Jehoram and Hoshea of Israel, and of Solomon, Ahaziah, Athaliah, Jehoahaz, Jehoiachin and Zedekiah of Judah. But for Solomon the authority cited, “book of the acts of Solomon” (1 Kings xi. 41), presumably presupposes Judaean chronicles, and the remaining cases preserve details of an annalistic character. Moreover, distinctive annalistic material is found for the Israelite kings Saul and Ishbosheth in 1 Sam. xiii. 1; xiv. 47-51; 2 Sam. ii. 8-10a (including even their age at accession), and for David in 2 Sam. ii. 11 and parts of v. and viii.
Consequently, it is important to differentiate between the older sources and the specific context in which the history has been placed; between earlier records and that particular style which, due to its connection with Deuteronomy General Structure. and other sections of the Old Testament that seem to have been similarly influenced by its teachings, can be conveniently labeled “Deuteronomistic.” For 811 his sources, the compiler primarily refers to two distinct works: the “words” or “chronicles” of the kings of Israel and those of the kings of Judah. Exactly how much is copied from these works and how much is expressed in the compiler’s own words is, of course, uncertain. Upon examination, it is clear that the current history usually consists of a summary of each reign. It notes the king’s age at succession (only for Judah), the length of reign, death and burial, along with mentions of his buildings, wars, and other political events.1 In the case of Judah, the name of the royal or queen-mother is specifically mentioned. References to the respective “chronicles,” made as if they were still accessible, are missing for Jehoram and Hoshea of Israel, and for Solomon, Ahaziah, Athaliah, Jehoahaz, Jehoiachin, and Zedekiah of Judah. However, for Solomon, the authority cited, “book of the acts of Solomon” (1 Kings xi. 41), presumably refers to Judean chronicles, and the other cases retain details of an annalistic nature. Additionally, distinctive annalistic material is found for the Israelite kings Saul and Ishbosheth in 1 Sam. xiii. 1; xiv. 47-51; 2 Sam. ii. 8-10a (including even their age at accession), and for David in 2 Sam. ii. 11 and parts of v. and viii.
The use which the compiler makes of his sources shows that his aim was not the history of the past but its religious significance. It is rare that even qualified praise is bestowed upon the kings of Israel (Jehoram, 2 Kings iii. 2; Jehu x. 30; Hoshea xvii. 2). Kings of great historical importance are treated with extreme brevity (Omri, Jeroboam (2), Uzziah), and similar meagreness of historical information is apparent when the editorial details and the religious judgments are eliminated from the accounts of Nadab, Baasha, and the successors of Jeroboam (2) in Israel or of Abijam and Manasseh in Judah.
The way the compiler uses his sources shows that his goal was not to create a history of the past but to highlight its religious significance. It's uncommon for even well-deserved praise to be given to the kings of Israel (Jehoram, 2 Kings iii. 2; Jehu x. 30; Hoshea xvii. 2). Kings who were historically significant are mentioned very briefly (Omri, Jeroboam (2), Uzziah), and this lack of historical detail is evident when you remove the editorial content and religious evaluations from the stories of Nadab, Baasha, and the successors of Jeroboam (2) in Israel or from Abijam and Manasseh in Judah.
To gain a more exact idea of the character of the book we may divide the history into three sections: (1) the life of Solomon, (2) the kingdoms of Ephraim (or Samaria)2 and Judah, and (3) the separate history of Judah after Solomon. the fall of Samaria. I. Solomon.—The events which lead up to the death of David and the accession of Solomon (1 Kings i., ii.) are closely connected with 2 Sam. ix.-xx. The unity is broken by the appendix 2 Sam. xxi. xxi.-xxiv. which is closely connected, as regards general subject-matter, with ibid. v.-viii.; the literary questions depend largely upon the structure of the books of Samuel (q.v.). It is evident, at least, that either the compiler drew upon other sources for the occasion and has been remarkably brief elsewhere, or that his epitomes have been supplemented by the later insertion of material not necessarily itself of late origin. At present 1 Kings i., ii. are both the close of David’s life (no source is cited) and the necessary introduction to Solomon. But Lucian’s recension of the Septuagint (ed. Lagarde), as also Josephus, begin the book at ii. 12, thus separating the annalistic accounts of the two. Since the contents of 1 Kings iii.-xi. do not form a continuous narrative, the compiler’s authority (“Acts of S.” xi. 41) can hardly have been an ordinary chronicle. The chapters comprise (a) sundry notices of the king’s prosperous and peaceful career, severed by (b) a description of the Temple and other buildings; and they conclude with (c) some account of the external troubles which prove to have unsettled the whole of his reign. After an introduction (iii.), a contains generalizing statements of Solomon’s might, wealth and wisdom (iv. 20 seq., 25, 29-34; x. 23-25, 27) and stories of a distinctly late and popular character (iii. 16-28, x. i-10, 13). The present lack of unity can in some cases be remedied by the Septuagint, which offers many deviations from the Hebrew text; this feature together with the present form of the parallel texts in Chronicles will exemplify the persistence of fluctuation to a late period (4th-2nd cent. B.C.).
To get a clearer understanding of the book's character, we can break its history into three sections: (1) the life of Solomon, (2) the kingdoms of Ephraim (or Samaria) and Judah, and (3) the separate history of Judah after the fall of Samaria. I. Solomon.—The events that lead up to David's death and Solomon's rise to power (1 Kings i., ii.) are closely tied to 2 Sam. ix.-xx. The unity is interrupted by the appendix 2 Sam. xxi.-xxiv., which is related in general subject matter to ibid. v.-viii.; the literary questions largely depend on the structure of the books of Samuel (q.v.). It’s clear that either the compiler used other sources for this occasion and has been notably brief elsewhere, or that his summaries were later supplemented with material that isn’t necessarily of late origin. Currently, 1 Kings i., ii. serve as both the conclusion of David’s life (no source is cited) and the essential introduction to Solomon. However, Lucian’s version of the Septuagint (ed. Lagarde), as well as Josephus, start the book at ii. 12, separating the historical accounts of the two. Since the content of 1 Kings iii.-xi. doesn’t create a continuous story, the compiler’s authority (“Acts of S.” xi. 41) likely wasn’t based on a standard chronicle. The chapters include (a) various accounts of the king's prosperous and peaceful reign, interrupted by (b) a description of the Temple and other buildings; they conclude with (c) an overview of the external troubles that ended up destabilizing his entire reign. After an introduction (iii.), there are general statements about Solomon’s power, wealth, and wisdom (iv. 20 seq., 25, 29-34; x. 23-25, 27) along with stories of a notably late and popular nature (iii. 16-28, x. i-10, 13). The current lack of unity can sometimes be fixed by referring to the Septuagint, which offers many differences from the Hebrew text; this feature, along with the current forms of parallel texts in Chronicles, illustrates the ongoing variations that persisted into a late period (4th-2nd cent. BCE).
Thus iii. 2 seq. cannot be by the same hand as v. 4, and v. 2 is probably a later Deut. gloss upon v. 3 (earlier Deut.), which represents the compiler’s view and (on the analogy of the framework) comes closely after ii. 12.3 Ch. iii. 1 can scarcely be severed from ix. 16, and in the Septuagint they appear in iv. in the order: iv. 1-19 (the officers), 27 seq. (their duties), 22-24 (the daily provision), 29-34 (Solomon’s reputation), iii. 1; ix. 16-17a (alliance with Egypt); iv. 20 seq. 25 are of a generalizing character and recur in the Septuagint with much supplementary matter in ii. Ch. iv. 26 is naturally related to x. 26 (cf. 2 Chron. i. 14) and takes its place in Lucian’s recension (cf. 2 Chron. ix. 25). There is considerable variation again in ix. 10-x. 29, and the order ix. 10-14, 26-28, x. 1-22 (so partly Septuagint) has the advantage of recording continuously Solomon’s dealings with Hiram. The intervening verses belong to a class of floating notices (in a very unnatural order) which seem to have got stranded almost by chance at different points in the two recensions; contrast also 2 Chron. viii. Solomon’s preliminary arrangements with Hiram in ch. v. have been elaborated to emphasize the importance of the Temple (vv. 3-5, cf. 2 Sam. vii.); further difficulty is caused by the relation between 13 seq. and 15 seq. (see 2 Chron. ii. 17 seq.) and between both of these and ix. 20 seq. xi. 28. The account of the royal buildings now sandwiched in between the related fragments of a is descriptive rather than narrative, and the accurate details might have been obtained by actual observation of the Temple at a date long subsequent to Solomon. It is not all due to a single hand. Ch. vi. 11-14 (with several late phrases) break the connexion and are omitted by the Septuagint; vv. 15-22, now untranslatable, appear in a simple and intelligible form in the Septuagint. The account of the dedication contains many signs of a late date; viii. 14-53, 54-61 are due to a Deuteronomic writer, and that they are an expansion of the older narrative (vv. 1-13) is suggested by the fact that the ancient fragment, vv. 12, 13 (imperfect in the Hebrew) appears in the Septuagint after v. 53 in completer form and with a reference to the book of Jashar as source (βιβλίον τῆς ᾠδῆς ספר (השיר) הישר). The redactional insertion displaced it in one recension and led to its mutilation in the other. With viii. 27-30, cf. generally Isa. xl.-lvi.; vv. 44-51 presuppose the exile, vv. 54-61 are wanting in Chron., and even the older parts of this chapter have also been retouched in conformity with later (even post-exilic) ritual and law. The Levites who appear at v. 4 in contrast to the priests, in a way unknown to the pre-exilic history, are not named in the Septuagint, which also omits the post-exilic term “congregation” (‘ēdah) in v. 5. There is a general similarity of subject with Deut. xxviii.
Thus iii. 2 and the following verses can't be by the same author as v. 4, and v. 2 is likely a later Deuteronomic addition to v. 3 (which is earlier Deuteronomic), reflecting the compiler’s perspective and, based on the structure, closely follows ii. 12.3 Ch. iii. 1 can hardly be separated from ix. 16, and in the Septuagint, they appear in iv. in this order: iv. 1-19 (the officers), 27 seq. (their duties), 22-24 (the daily provision), 29-34 (Solomon’s reputation), iii. 1; ix. 16-17a (alliance with Egypt); iv. 20 seq. 25 have a generalizing tone and reappear in the Septuagint with additional material in ii. Ch. iv. 26 is naturally linked to x. 26 (see also 2 Chron. i. 14) and fits into Lucian’s version (cf. 2 Chron. ix. 25). There’s significant variation in ix. 10-x. 29, and the arrangement ix. 10-14, 26-28, x. 1-22 (partly so in the Septuagint) effectively documents Solomon’s interactions with Hiram. The verses in between belong to a collection of loosely connected notes (in a very awkward order) that seem to have been randomly placed at various points in the two versions; contrast with 2 Chron. viii. Solomon’s initial arrangements with Hiram in ch. v. have been expanded to highlight the significance of the Temple (vv. 3-5, cf. 2 Sam. vii.); further complications arise from the connection between 13 seq. and 15 seq. (see 2 Chron. ii. 17 seq.) and their relationship with ix. 20 seq. and xi. 28. The description of the royal buildings, now inserted between the related pieces of a, is more descriptive than narrative, and the precise details might have been gathered from an actual observation of the Temple long after Solomon’s time. It's not the work of a single author. Ch. vi. 11-14 (with several later phrases) disrupt the flow and are left out of the Septuagint; vv. 15-22, which are now untranslatable, appear in a clear form in the Septuagint. The account of the dedication shows many signs of a later period; viii. 14-53, 54-61 are attributed to a Deuteronomic writer, and that they expand on the older story (vv. 1-13) is indicated by the fact that the ancient fragment, vv. 12, 13 (imperfect in Hebrew), appears in the Septuagint after v. 53 in a more complete form, referencing the book of Jashar as a source (book of the ode The Straight Book (the song)). The editorial addition displaced it in one version and led to its alteration in the other. With viii. 27-30, see generally Isa. xl.-lvi.; vv. 44-51 assume the exile, vv. 54-61 are missing in Chron., and even the older sections of this chapter have been modified to fit later (even post-exilic) rituals and laws. The Levites mentioned in v. 4, in contrast to the priests, in a way that is not recognized in pre-exilic history, are not named in the Septuagint, which also excludes the post-exilic term “congregation” (‘ēdah) in v. 5. There is an overall thematic similarity with Deut. xxviii.
The account of the end of Solomon’s reign deals with (a) his religious laxity (xi. 1-13, now in a Deuteronomic form), as the punishment for which the separation of the two kingdoms is announced; and (b) the rise of the adversaries who, according to xi. 25, had troubled the whole of his reign, and therefore cannot have been related originally as the penalty for the sins of his old age. Both, however, form an introduction to subsequent events, and the life of Solomon concludes with a brief annalistic notice of his death, length of reign, successor, and place of burial. (See further Solomon.)
The story of the end of Solomon’s reign addresses (a) his decline in religious commitment (xi. 1-13, now in a Deuteronomic style), for which the division of the two kingdoms is announced as punishment; and (b) the emergence of his enemies who, according to xi. 25, troubled him throughout his reign, and thus cannot have been originally presented as the consequence of his later sins. Both points, however, serve as an introduction to the events that follow, and Solomon’s life ends with a brief summary of his death, length of reign, successor, and burial site. (See further Solomon.)
II. Ephraim and Judah.—In the history of the two kingdoms the redactor follows a fixed scheme determined, as has been seen, by the order of succession. The fluctuation of tradition concerning the circumstances of the The Divided Kingdom. schism is evident from a comparison with the Septuagint, and all that is related of Ahijah falls under suspicion of being foreign to the oldest history.4 The story of the man of God from Judah (xiii.) is shown to be late by its general tone (conceptions of prophetism and revelation),5 and by the term “cities of Samaria” (v. 32, for Samaria as a province, cf. 2 Kings xvii. 24, 26; for the building of the city by Omri see 1 Kings xvi. 24). It is a late Judaean narrative inserted after the Deuteronomic redaction, and 812 breaks the connexion between xii. 31 and xiii. 33 seq. The latter describe the idolatrous worship instituted by the first king of the schismatic north, and the religious attitude occurs regularly throughout the compiler’s epitome, however brief the reigns of the kings. In the account of Nadab, xv. 25 seq., 29b, 30 seq. are certainly the compiler’s, and the synchronism in v. 28 must also be editorial; xv. 32 (Septuagint omit) and 16 are duplicates leading up to the Israelite and Judaean accounts of Baasha respectively. But xv. 33-xvi. 7 contains little annalistic information, and the prophecy in xvi. 1-4 is very similar to xiv. 7-11, which in turn breaks the connexion between vv. 6 and 12. Ch. xvi. 7 is a duplicate to vv. 1-4 and out of place; the Septuagint inserts it in the middle of v. 8. The brief reign of Elah preserves an important entract in xvi. 9, but the date in v. 10a (LXX. omits) presupposes the late finished chronological scheme. Zimri’s seven days receive the inevitable condemnation, but the older material embedded in the framework (xvi. 15b-18) is closely connected with v. 9 and is continued in the non-editorial portions of Omri’s reign (xvi. 21 seq., length of reign in v. 23, and v. 24). The achievements of Omri to which the editor refers can fortunately be gathered from external sources (see Omri). Under Omri’s son Ahab the separate kingdoms converge.
II. Ephraim and Judah.—In the history of the two kingdoms, the editor follows a consistent pattern based on the order of succession. The varying accounts of the circumstances surrounding the break, as seen in the comparison with the Septuagint, show that much associated with Ahijah may not be part of the oldest history. The story of the man of God from Judah (xiii.) appears to be later due to its general tone (ideas of prophecy and revelation), and the phrase “cities of Samaria” (v. 32, referring to Samaria as a province, see 2 Kings xvii. 24, 26; for the city's construction by Omri see 1 Kings xvi. 24). This is a later Judaean account added after the Deuteronomic editing, which disrupts the connection between xii. 31 and xiii. 33 onward. The latter details the idol worship established by the first king of the breakaway northern kingdom, and this religious attitude regularly appears throughout the compiler’s summary, regardless of the short reigns of the kings. In the account of Nadab, xv. 25 onward, verses 29b, 30 onward are certainly from the compiler, and the synchronization in v. 28 must also be editorial; xv. 32 (omitted in the Septuagint) and 16 are duplicates leading to the accounts of Baasha in Israel and Judah respectively. However, xv. 33-xvi. 7 contains little annalistic information, and the prophecy in xvi. 1-4 closely resembles xiv. 7-11, which in turn disconnects vv. 6 and 12. Chapter xvi. 7 duplicates vv. 1-4 and is out of order; the Septuagint places it in the middle of v. 8. The brief reign of Elah includes an important section in xvi. 9, but the date in v. 10a (omitted in LXX) assumes a finished timeline that is late. Zimri’s seven days face certain condemnation, yet the older material within that structure (xvi. 15b-18) is closely tied to v. 9 and continues in the parts of Omri’s reign that are not editorial (xvi. 21 onward, length of reign in v. 23, and v. 24). The accomplishments of Omri, referenced by the editor, can fortunately be verified through external sources (see Omri). Under Omri’s son Ahab, the separate kingdoms begin to converge.
Next, as to Judah: the vivid account of the accession of Rehoboam in xii. 1-16 is reminiscent of the full narratives in 2 Sam. ix.-xx.; 1 Kings i., ii. (cf. especially v. 16 with 2 Sam. xx. 1); xii. 15b refers to the prophecy of Ahijah (see above), and “unto this day,” v. 19, cannot be by a contemporary author; v. 17 (LXX. omits) finds a parallel in 2 Chron. xi. 16 seq., and could represent an Ephraimite standpoint. The Judaean standpoint is prominent in vv. 21-24, where (a) the inclusion of Benjamin and (b) the cessation of war (at the command of Shemaiah) conflict with (a) xi. 32, 36, xii. 20 and (b) xiv. 30 respectively. Rehoboam’s history, resumed by the redactor in xiv. 21-24, continues with a brief account of the spoiling of the Temple and palace by Sheshonk (Shishak). (The incident appears in 2 Chron. xii. in a rather different context, before the details which now precede v. 21 seq.) The reign of Abijam is entirely due to the editor, whose brief statement of the war in xv. 7b is supplemented by a lengthy story in 2 Chron. xiii. (where the name is Abijah). Ch. xv. 5b (last clause) and v. 6 are omitted by the Septuagint, the former is a unique gloss (see 2 Sam. xi. seq.), the latter is a mere repetition of xiv. 30; with xv. 2 cf. v. 10. The account of Asa’s long reign contains a valuable summary of his war with Baasha, xv. 16-22; the isolated v. 15 is quite obscure and is possibly related to v. 18 (but cf. vii. 51). His successor Jehoshaphat is now dealt with completely in xxii. 41-50 after the death of Ahab; but the Septuagint, which follows a different chronological scheme (placing his accession in the reign of Omri), gives the summary (with some variations) after xvi. 28. Another light is thrown upon the incomplete annalistic fragments (xxii. 44, 47-49) by 2 Chron. xx. 35-37: the friendship between Judah and Israel appears to have been displeasing to the redactor of Kings.
Next, regarding Judah: the detailed account of Rehoboam's rise to power in xii. 1-16 reminds us of the comprehensive narratives in 2 Sam. ix.-xx.; 1 Kings i., ii. (especially compare v. 16 with 2 Sam. xx. 1); xii. 15b refers to the prophecy of Ahijah (see above), and “to this day,” v. 19, cannot be by a contemporary author; v. 17 (which the LXX. omits) has a parallel in 2 Chron. xi. 16 seq., and might reflect an Ephraimite viewpoint. The perspective from Judah is clear in vv. 21-24, where (a) the inclusion of Benjamin and (b) the end of hostilities (at Shemaiah's command) conflict with (a) xi. 32, 36, xii. 20 and (b) xiv. 30, respectively. The compiler resumes Rehoboam’s story in xiv. 21-24, continuing with a brief account of the looting of the Temple and palace by Sheshonk (Shishak). (This event appears in 2 Chron. xii in a fairly different context, before the details that now precede v. 21 seq.) The reign of Abijam is entirely attributed to the editor, whose brief mention of the war in xv. 7b is expanded by a lengthy narrative in 2 Chron. xiii. (where he is called Abijah). Ch. xv. 5b (the last part) and v. 6 are omitted by the Septuagint; the former is a unique gloss (see 2 Sam. xi. seq.), while the latter merely repeats xiv. 30; for xv. 2, see v. 10. The account of Asa’s lengthy reign includes a valuable summary of his conflict with Baasha, xv. 16-22; the isolated v. 15 is quite unclear and may relate to v. 18 (but see vii. 51). His successor Jehoshaphat is now fully addressed in xxii. 41-50 after Ahab's death; however, the Septuagint, which follows a different timeline (placing his rise during Omri's reign), provides the summary (with some variations) after xvi. 28. Another perspective on the incomplete chronological fragments (xxii. 44, 47-49) is offered by 2 Chron. xx. 35-37: the friendship between Judah and Israel seems to have displeased the compiler of Kings.
The history of the few years between the close of Ahab’s life and the accession of Jehu covers about one-third of the entire book of Kings. This is due to the inclusion of a number of narratives which are partly of Ephraim from Ahab to Jehu. a political character, and partly are interested in the work of contemporary prophets. The climax is reached in the overthrow of Omri’s dynasty by the usurper Jehu, when, after a period of close intercourse between Israel and Judah, its two kings perished. The annals of each kingdom would naturally deal independently with these events, but the present literary structure of 1 Kings xvii.-2 Kings xi. is extremely complicated by the presence of the narratives referred to. First as regards the framework, the epitome of Ahab is preserved in xvi. 29-34 and xxii. 39; it contains some unknown references (his ivory house and cities), and a stern religious judgment upon his Phoenician alliance, on which the intervening chapters throw more light. The colourless summary of his son Ahaziah (xxii. 51-53)6 finds its conclusion in 2 Kings i. 17 seq. where v. 18 should precede the accession of his brother Jehoram (v. 17b). Jehoram is again introduced in iii. 1-3 (note the variant synchronism), but the usual conclusion is wanting. In Judah, Jehoshaphat was succeeded by his son Jehoram, who had married Athaliah the daughter of Ahab and Jezebel (viii. 16-24); to the annalistic details (vv. 20-22) 2 Chron. xxi. 11 sqq. adds a novel narrative. His son Ahaziah (viii. 25 sqq.) is similarly denounced for his relations with Israel. He is again introduced in the isolated ix. 29, while Lucian’s recension adds after x. 36 a variant summary of his reign but without the regular introduction. Further confusion appears in the Septuagint, which inserts after i. 18 (Jehoram of Israel) a notice corresponding to iii. 1-3, and concludes “and the anger of the Lord was kindled against the house of Ahab.” This would be appropriate in a position nearer ix. seq. where the deaths of Jehoram and Ahaziah are described. These and other examples of serious disorder in the framework may be associated with the literary features of the narratives of Elijah and Elisha.
The history of the few years between the end of Ahab’s life and the rise of Jehu spans about one-third of the whole book of Kings. This is because it includes several narratives that are partly political in nature and partly focus on the work of contemporary prophets. The peak of the story comes with the overthrow of Omri’s dynasty by the usurper Jehu, when, after a time of close relations between Israel and Judah, their two kings died. Each kingdom's records would typically address these events separately, but the current structure of 1 Kings xvii.-2 Kings xi. is really complicated by the narratives mentioned. First, regarding the framework, Ahab's summary is found in xvi. 29-34 and xxii. 39; it includes some unknown references (his ivory house and cities) and a harsh religious judgment on his alliance with Phoenicia, which the chapters in between clarify further. The bland summary of his son Ahaziah (xxii. 51-53) concludes in 2 Kings i. 17 seq., where v. 18 should come before the accession of his brother Jehoram (v. 17b). Jehoram is mentioned again in iii. 1-3 (note the different timeline), but the usual conclusion is missing. In Judah, Jehoshaphat was succeeded by his son Jehoram, who married Athaliah, the daughter of Ahab and Jezebel (viii. 16-24); in addition to the annalistic details (vv. 20-22), 2 Chron. xxi. 11 sqq. adds a new narrative. His son Ahaziah (viii. 25 sqq.) is similarly criticized for his ties with Israel. He is mentioned again in the isolated ix. 29, while Lucian’s version adds a different summary of his reign after x. 36 but without the usual introduction. More confusion arises in the Septuagint, which inserts a note corresponding to iii. 1-3 after i. 18 (Jehoram of Israel) and ends with “and the anger of the Lord was kindled against the house of Ahab.” This would fit better closer to ix. seq. where the deaths of Jehoram and Ahaziah are described. These and other examples of significant disorder in the framework may be linked to the literary features of the narratives of Elijah and Elisha.
Of the more detailed narratives those that deal with the northern kingdom are scarcely Judaean (see 1 Kings xix. 3), and they do not criticize Elijah’s work, as the Judaean compiler denounces the whole history of the north. But they are plainly not of one origin. To supplement the articles Elijah and Elisha, it is to be noticed that the account of Naboth’s death in the history of Elijah (1 Kings xxi.) differs in details from that in the history of Elisha and Jehu (2 Kings ix.), and the latter more precise narrative presupposes events recorded in the extant accounts of Elijah but not these events themselves. In 1 Kings xx., xxii. 1-28 (xxi. follows xix. in the LXX.) Ahab is viewed rather more favourably than in the Elijah-narratives (xix., xxi.) or in the compiler’s summary. Ch. xxii. 6, moreover, proves that there is some exaggeration in xviii. 4, 13; the great contest between Elijah and the king, between Yahweh and Baal, has been idealized. The denunciation of Ahab in xx. 35-43 has some notable points of contact with xiii. and seems to be a supplement to the preceding incidents. Ch. xxii. is important for its ideas of prophetism (especially vv. 19-23; cf. Ezek. xiv. 9; 2 Sam. xxiv. 1 [in contrast to 1 Chron. xxi. 1]); a gloss at the end of v. 28, omitted by the Septuagint, wrongly identifies Micaiah with the well-known Micah (i. 2). Although the punishment passed upon Ahab in xxi. 20 sqq. (20b-26 betray the compiler’s hand; cf. xiv. 10 seq.) is modified in v. 29, this is ignored in the account of his death, xxii. 38, which takes place at Samaria (see below).
Of the more detailed narratives, those that focus on the northern kingdom are hardly from Judah (see 1 Kings xix. 3), and they don’t criticize Elijah’s work, unlike the Judean compiler, who condemns the entire history of the north. However, it's clear that they don’t all come from the same source. To expand on the articles Elijah and Elisha, it’s worth noting that the account of Naboth’s death in the history of Elijah (1 Kings xxi.) has different details compared to the accounts in the history of Elisha and Jehu (2 Kings ix.), and the latter, which is more precise, assumes events recorded in the existing accounts of Elijah that are not themselves included in those events. In 1 Kings xx., xxii. 1-28 (xxi. follows xix. in the LXX), Ahab appears somewhat better than in the Elijah narratives (xix., xxi.) or in the compiler’s summary. Additionally, ch. xxii. 6 shows that there’s some exaggeration in xviii. 4, 13; the major conflict between Elijah and the king, between Yahweh and Baal, has been idealized. The condemnation of Ahab in xx. 35-43 shares some notable similarities with xiii. and seems to be an addition to the previous incidents. Ch. xxii. is significant for its concepts of prophetism (especially vv. 19-23; cf. Ezek. xiv. 9; 2 Sam. xxiv. 1 [in contrast to 1 Chron. xxi. 1]); a note at the end of v. 28, which the Septuagint left out, mistakenly identifies Micaiah with the famous Micah (i. 2). Although the punishment delivered to Ahab in xxi. 20 sqq. (20b-26 shows the compiler's influence; cf. xiv. 10 seq.) is altered in v. 29, this is ignored in the account of his death in xxii. 38, which occurs in Samaria (see below).
The episode of Elijah and Ahaziah (2 Kings i.) is marked by the revelation through an angel. The prophet’s name appears in an unusual form (viz. ēliyyah, not -yahu), especially in vv. 2-8. The prediction of Ahaziah’s fate finds a parallel in 2 Chron. xxi. 12-15; the more supernatural additions have been compared with the late story in 1 Sam. xix. 18-24. The ascension of Elijah (2 Kings ii.) is related as the introduction to the work of Elisha, which apparently begins before the death of Jehoshaphat (see iii. 1, 11 sqq.; contrast 2 Chron. loc. cit.). Among the stories of Elisha are some which find him at the head of the prophetic gilds (iv. 1, 38-44, vi. 1-7), whilst in others he has friendly relations with the “king of Israel” and the court. As a personage of almost superhuman dignity he moves in certain narratives where political records appear to have been utilized to describe the activity of the prophets. The Moabite campaign (iii.) concerns a revolt already referred to in the isolated i. 1; there are parallels with the story of Jehoshaphat and Ahab (iii. 7, 11 seq.; cf. 1 Kings xxii. 4 seq., 7 sqq.), contrast, however, xxii. 7 (where Elijah is not even named) and iii. 11 seq. But Jehoshaphat’s death has been already recorded (1 Kings xxii. 50), and, while Lucian’s recension in 2 Kings iii. reads Ahaziah, i. 17 presupposes the accession of the Judaean Jehoram. Other political narratives may underlie the stories of the Aramaean wars; with vi. 24-vii. 20 (after the complete cessation of hostilities in vi. 23) compare the general style of 1 Kings xx., xxii.; with the famine in Samaria, vi. 25; cf. ibid. xvii.; with the victory, cf. ibid. xx. The account of Elisha and Hazael (viii. 7-15) implies friendly relations with Damascus (in v. 12 the terrors of war are in the future), but the description of Jehu’s accession (ix.) is in the midst of hostilities. Ch. ix. 7-10a are a Deuteronomic insertion amplifying the message in vv. 3-6 (cf. 1 Kings xxi. 20 seq.). The origin of the repetition in ix. 14-15a (cf. viii. 28 seq.) is not clear. The oracle in ix. 25 seq. is not that in 1 Kings xxi. 19 seq., and mentions the additional detail that Naboth’s sons were slain. Here his field or portion is located near Jezreel, but in 1 Kings xxi. 18 his vineyard is by the royal palace in Samaria (cf. xxii. 38 and contrast xxi. 1, where the LXX. omits reference to Jezreel). This fluctuation reappears in 2 Kings x. 1, 11 seq., and 17; in ix. 27 compared with 2 Chron. xxii. 9; and in the singular duplication of an historical incident, viz. the war against the Aramaeans at Ramoth-Gilead (a) by Jehoshaphat and Ahab, and (b) by Ahaziah and Jehoram, in each 813 case with the death of the Israelite king, at Samaria and Jezreel respectively (see above and observe the contradiction in 1 Kings xxi. 29 and xxii. 38). These and other critical questions in this section are involved with (a) the probability that Elisha’s work belongs rather to the accession of Jehu, with whose dynasty he was on most intimate terms until his death some forty-five years later (2 Kings xiii. 14-21), and (b) the problem of the wars between Israel and Syria which appear to have begun only in the time of Jehu (x. 32). See Jew. Quart. Rev. (1908), pp. 597-630, and Jews: History, § 11 seq.
The story of Elijah and Ahaziah (2 Kings i.) is highlighted by a revelation from an angel. The prophet's name is presented in an uncommon form (i.e., ēliyyah, not -yahu), particularly in vv. 2-8. The prediction regarding Ahaziah’s fate parallels what is found in 2 Chron. xxi. 12-15; the more supernatural elements have been compared to the later narrative in 1 Sam. xix. 18-24. Elijah’s ascension (2 Kings ii.) is depicted as the lead-in to Elisha's work, which seems to start before Jehoshaphat's death (see iii. 1, 11 sqq.; compare 2 Chron. loc. cit.). Among the stories about Elisha, some show him leading the prophetic groups (iv. 1, 38-44, vi. 1-7), while in others he maintains friendly ties with the "king of Israel" and the royal court. As a figure of near-superhuman stature, he appears in certain accounts where political records seem to be used to illustrate the prophets' activities. The Moabite campaign (iii.) pertains to a revolt already mentioned in isolated i. 1; there are parallels with the accounts of Jehoshaphat and Ahab (iii. 7, 11 seqq.; cf. 1 Kings xxii. 4 seqq., 7 sqq.), but compare that to xxii. 7 (where Elijah isn't even mentioned) and iii. 11 seqq. Jehoshaphat’s death has already been noted (1 Kings xxii. 50), and while Lucian’s version in 2 Kings iii. states Ahaziah, i. 17 anticipates the rise of the Judaean Jehoram. Other political narratives might underpin the stories of the Aramaean wars; compare vi. 24-vii. 20 (after the total end of hostilities in vi. 23) with the general style of 1 Kings xx., xxii.; the famine in Samaria in vi. 25; cf. ibid. xvii.; and the victory, cf. ibid. xx. The account of Elisha and Hazael (viii. 7-15) hints at amicable relations with Damascus (in v. 12, the fears of war lie ahead), but the description of Jehu’s rise to power (ix.) occurs amid conflict. Ch. ix. 7-10a is a Deuteronomic addition expanding on the message in vv. 3-6 (cf. 1 Kings xxi. 20 seqq.). The reasoning for the repetition in ix. 14-15a (cf. viii. 28 seqq.) is unclear. The prophecy in ix. 25 seqq. is different from that in 1 Kings xxi. 19 seqq. and includes the extra detail that Naboth's sons were killed. His field or area is stated to be near Jezreel, but in 1 Kings xxi. 18 his vineyard is by the royal palace in Samaria (cf. xxii. 38, and compare xxi. 1, where the LXX. drops the mention of Jezreel). This inconsistency arises again in 2 Kings x. 1, 11 seqq., and 17; in ix. 27 compared with 2 Chron. xxii. 9; and in the unique repetition of a historical event, namely, the war against the Aramaeans at Ramoth-Gilead (a) by Jehoshaphat and Ahab, and (b) by Ahaziah and Jehoram, both resulting in the death of the Israelite king, at Samaria and Jezreel respectively (see above and note the conflicting accounts in 1 Kings xxi. 29 and xxii. 38). These and other critical issues in this section relate to (a) the likelihood that Elisha’s work aligns more with Jehu's rise, with whom he had a close relationship until his death some forty-five years later (2 Kings xiii. 14-21), and (b) the context of the wars between Israel and Syria that seem to have started only during Jehu’s reign (x. 32). See Jew. Quart. Rev. (1908), pp. 597-630, and Jews: History, § 11 seqq.
In the annals of Jehu’s dynasty the editorial introduction to Jehu himself is wanting (x. 32 sqq.), although Lucian’s recension in x. 36 concludes in annalistic manner the lives of Jehoram of Israel and Ahaziah of Dynasty of Jehu. Judah. The summary mentions the beginning of the Aramaean wars, the continuation of which is found in the redactor’s account of his successor Jehoahaz (xiii. 1-9). But xiii. 4-6 modify the disasters, and by pointing to the “saviour” or deliverer (cf. Judg. iii. 9, 15) anticipate xiv. 27. The self-contained account of his son Jehoash (xiii. 10-13) is supplemented (a) by the story of the death of Elisha (vv. 14-21) and (b) by some account of the Aramaean wars (vv. 22-25), where v. 23, like vv. 4-6 (Lucian’s recension actually reads it after v. 7), is noteworthy for the sympathy towards the northern kingdom. Further (c) the defeat of Amaziah of Judah appears in xiv. 8-14 after the annals of Judah, although from an Israelite source (v. 11b Bethshemesh defined as belonging to Judah, see also v. 15, and with the repetition of the concluding statements in v. 15 seq., see xiii. 12 seq.). These features and the transference of xiii. 12 seq. after xiii. 25 in Lucian’s recension point to late adjustment. In Judaean history, Jehu’s reform and the overthrow of Jezebel in the north (ix., x. 15-28) find their counterpart in the murder of Athaliah and the destruction of the temple of Baal in Judah (xi. 18). But the framework is incomplete. The editorial conclusion of the reign of Ahaziah, the introduction to that of Athaliah, and the sources for both are wanting. A lengthy Judaean document is incorporated detailing the accession of Joash and the prominence of the abruptly introduced priest Jehoiada. The interest in the Temple and temple-procedure is obvious; and both xi. and xii. have points of resemblance with xxii. seq. (see below and cf. also xi. 4, 7, 11, 19, with 1 Kings xiv. 27 seq.). The usual epitome is found in xi. 21-xii. 3 (the age at accession should follow the synchronism, so Lucian), with fragments of annalistic matter in xii. 17-21 (another version in 2 Chron. xxiv. 23 sqq.). For Joash’s son Amaziah see above; xiv. 6 refers to Deut. xxiv. 16, and 2 Chron. xxv. 5-16 replaces v. 7 by a lengthy narrative with some interesting details. Azariah or Uzziah is briefly summarized in xv. 1-7, hence the notice in xiv. 22 seems out of place; perhaps the usual statements of Amaziah’s death and burial (cf. xiv. 20b, 22b), which were to be expected after v. 18, have been supplemented by the account of the rebellion (vv. 19, 20a, 21).7 The chronological notes for the accession of Azariah imply different views of the history of Judah after the defeat of Amaziah; with xiv. 17, cf. xiii. 10, xiv. 2, 23, but contrast xv. 1, and again v. 8.8
In the records of Jehu’s dynasty, the editorial introduction to Jehu himself is missing (x. 32 sqq.), although Lucian's version in x. 36 ends in a historical style discussing the reigns of Jehoram of Israel and Ahaziah of Jehu Dynasty. Judah. The summary talks about the start of the Aramaean wars, which continues in the redactor’s account of his successor Jehoahaz (xiii. 1-9). However, xiii. 4-6 softens the disasters and anticipates the “saviour” or deliverer (cf. Judg. iii. 9, 15), looking forward to xiv. 27. The self-contained account of his son Jehoash (xiii. 10-13) is added to with (a) the story of Elisha’s death (vv. 14-21) and (b) a brief overview of the Aramaean wars (vv. 22-25), where v. 23, like vv. 4-6 (Lucian’s version actually places this after v. 7), stands out for its sympathy towards the northern kingdom. Additionally, (c) the defeat of Amaziah of Judah is mentioned in xiv. 8-14 after the annals of Judah, although it comes from an Israelite source (v. 11b defines Bethshemesh as belonging to Judah; see also v. 15, and with the repetition of the concluding statements in v. 15 seq., see xiii. 12 seq.). These elements and the placement of xiii. 12 seq. after xiii. 25 in Lucian’s version indicate a late revision. In Judah’s history, Jehu’s reform and the overthrow of Jezebel in the north (ix., x. 15-28) are mirrored by the murder of Athaliah and the destruction of the temple of Baal in Judah (xi. 18). However, the framework feels incomplete. The editorial conclusion of Ahaziah’s reign, the introduction to Athaliah's reign, and the sources for both are missing. A lengthy Judah document is included that details Joash’s accession and the sudden prominence of the priest Jehoiada. The focus on the Temple and temple procedures is clear; and both xi. and xii. have similarities with xxii. seq. (see below and also cf. xi. 4, 7, 11, 19, with 1 Kings xiv. 27 seq.). The usual summary is found in xi. 21-xii. 3 (the age at accession should follow the synchronism, according to Lucian), with fragments of historical material in xii. 17-21 (another version in 2 Chron. xxiv. 23 sqq.). For Joash’s son Amaziah, see above; xiv. 6 refers to Deut. xxiv. 16, and 2 Chron. xxv. 5-16 replaces v. 7 with a lengthy narrative containing some interesting details. Azariah or Uzziah is briefly covered in xv. 1-7, so the mention in xiv. 22 feels out of place; possibly the standard statements about Amaziah’s death and burial (cf. xiv. 20b, 22b), which would be expected after v. 18, have been added to with the account of the rebellion (vv. 19, 20a, 21). The chronological notes for Azariah's accession suggest differing views on Judah's history after Amaziah's defeat; with xiv. 17, cf. xiii. 10, xiv. 2, 23, but contrast xv. 1, and again v. 8.
The important reign of Jeroboam (2) is dismissed as briefly as that of Azariah (xiv. 23-29). The end of the Aramaean war presupposed by v. 25 is supplemented by the sympathetic addition in v. 26 seq. (cf. xiii. 4 seq. 23). Of his successors Zechariah, Shallum and Menahem only the briefest records remain, now imbedded in the editorial framework (xv. 8-25). The summary of Pekah (perhaps the same as Pekahiah, the confusion being due to the compiler) contains excerpts which form the continuation of the older material in v. 25 (cf. also vv. 10, 14, 16, 19, 20). For an apparently similar adjustment of an earlier record to the framework see above on 1 Kings xv. 25-31, xvi. 8-25. The account of Hoshea’s conspiracy (xv. 29 seq.) gives the Israelite version with which Tiglath-Pileser’s own statement can now be compared. Two accounts of the fall of Samaria are given, one of which is under the reign of the contemporary Judaean Hezekiah (xvii. i-6, xviii. 9-12); the chronology is again intricate. Reflections on the disappearance of the northern kingdom appear in xvii. 7-23 and xviii. 12; the latter belongs to the Judaean history. The former is composite; xvii. 21-23 (cf. v. 18) look back to the introduction of calf-worship by Jeroboam (1), and agree with the compiler’s usual standpoint; but vv. 19-20 include Judah and presuppose the exile. The remaining verses survey types of idolatry partly of a general kind (vv. 9-12, 16a), and partly characteristic of Judah in the last years of the monarchy (vv. 16b, 17). The brief account of the subsequent history of Israel in xvii. 24-41 is not from one source, since the piety of the new settlers (v. 32-34a, 41) conflicts with the later point of view in 34b-40. The last-mentioned supplements the epilogue in xvii. 7-23, forms a solemn conclusion to the history of the northern kingdom, and is apparently aimed at the Samaritans.
The significant reign of Jeroboam (2) is brushed over just like that of Azariah (xiv. 23-29). The conclusion of the Aramaean war mentioned in v. 25 is expanded on with the sympathetic details in v. 26 and following (see also xiii. 4 and seq. 23). Of his successors, Zechariah, Shallum, and Menahem, only the briefest accounts remain, now included in the editorial framework (xv. 8-25). The summary of Pekah (possibly the same as Pekahiah, the confusion arises from the compiler) includes excerpts that continue the older material in v. 25 (see also vv. 10, 14, 16, 19, 20). For a seemingly similar adaptation of an earlier record to the framework, refer to 1 Kings xv. 25-31, xvi. 8-25. The narrative of Hoshea’s conspiracy (xv. 29 seq.) presents the Israelite perspective, which can now be compared with Tiglath-Pileser’s own account. Two versions of the fall of Samaria are provided, one occurring during the reign of the contemporary Judaean king Hezekiah (xvii. i-6, xviii. 9-12); the chronology is once again complex. Reflections on the fall of the northern kingdom can be found in xvii. 7-23 and xviii. 12; the latter is part of Judaean history. The former is mixed; xvii. 21-23 (see v. 18) refers back to the introduction of calf-worship by Jeroboam (1) and aligns with the compiler’s typical viewpoint; however, vv. 19-20 mentions Judah and assumes the exile. The remaining verses explore types of idolatry, some general (vv. 9-12, 16a), and some specific to Judah in the final years of the monarchy (vv. 16b, 17). The brief account of Israel's subsequent history in xvii. 24-41 is not from a single source, as the piety of the new settlers (v. 32-34a, 41) conflicts with the later perspective in 34b-40. The latter adds to the epilogue in xvii. 7-23, providing a solemn conclusion to the history of the northern kingdom, seemingly directed at the Samaritans.
III. Later History of Judah.—The summary of Jotham (xv. 32-38) shows interest in the Temple (v. 35) and alludes to the hostility of Pekah (v. 37) upon which the Israelite annals are silent. 2. Chron. xxvii. expands Judah. the former but replaces the latter by other not unrelated details (see Uzziah). But xv. 37 is resumed afresh in the account of the reign of Ahaz (xvi. 5 sqq.; the text in v. 6 is confused)—another version in 2 Chron. xxviii. 5 sqq.—and is supplemented by a description, evidently from the Temple records, in which the ritual innovations by “king Ahaz” (in contrast to “Ahaz” alone in vv. 5-9) are described (vv. 10-18). There is further variation of detail in 2 Chron. xxviii. 20-27. The summary of Hezekiah (xviii. 1-8) emphasizes his important religious reforms (greatly expanded in 2 Chron. xxix. seq. from a later standpoint), and includes two references to his military achievements. Of these v. 8 is ignored in Chron., and v. 7 is supplemented by (a) the annalistic extract in vv. 13-16, and (b) narratives in which the great contemporary prophet Isaiah is the central figure. The latter are later than Isaiah himself (xix. 37 refers to 681 B.C.) and reappear, with some abbreviation and rearrangement, in Isa. xxxvi.-xxxix. (see Isaiah). They are partly duplicate (cf. xix. 7 with vv. 28, 33; vv. 10-13 with xviii. 28-35), and consist of two portions, xviii. 17-xix. 8 (Isa. xxxvi. 2-xxxvii. 8) and xix. 9b-35 (Isa. xxxvii. 9b-36); to which of these xix. 9a and v. 36 seq. belong is disputed. 2 Chron. xxxii. (where these accounts are condensed) is in general agreement with 2 Kings xviii. 7, as against vv. 14-16. The poetical fragment, xix. 21-28, is connected with the sign in vv. 29-31; both seem to break the connexion between xix. 20 and 32 sqq. Chap. xx. 1-19 appears to belong to an earlier period in Hezekiah’s reign (see v. 6 and cf. 2 Chron. xxxii. 25 seq.); with vv. 1-11 note carefully the forms in Isa. xxxviii. 1-8, 21 seq., and 2 Chron. xxxii. 24-26; with xx. 12-19 (Isa. xxxix) contrast the brief allusion in 2 Chron. xxxii. 31. In v. 17 seq. the exile is foreshadowed. Use has probably been made of a late cycle of Isaiah-stories; such a work is actually mentioned in 2 Chron. xxxii. 32. The accounts of the reactionary kings Manasseh and Amon, although now by the compiler, give some reference to political events (see xxi. 17, 23 seq.); xxi. 7-15 refer to the exile and find a parallel in xxiii. 26 seq., and xxi. 10 sqq. are replaced in 2 Chron. xxxiii. 10-20 by a novel record of Manasseh’s penitence (see also ibid. v. 23 and note omission of 2 Kings xxiii. 26 from Chron).
III. Later History of Judah.—The summary of Jotham (xv. 32-38) shows an interest in the Temple (v. 35) and mentions the conflict with Pekah (v. 37), which is absent from the Israelite records. 2 Chronicles xxvii expands on the former but replaces the latter with other related details (see Uzziah). However, xv. 37 is revisited in the account of Ahaz's reign (xvi. 5 sqq.; the text in v. 6 is unclear)—there’s another version in 2 Chronicles xxviii. 5 sqq.—and is supplemented by a description, clearly from the Temple records, that details the ritual changes made by “king Ahaz” (noted differently as just “Ahaz” in vv. 5-9) (vv. 10-18). There are additional variations in 2 Chronicles xxviii. 20-27. The summary of Hezekiah (xviii. 1-8) highlights his significant religious reforms (which are greatly elaborated in 2 Chronicles xxix. et seq. from a later perspective) and includes two mentions of his military victories. Of these, v. 8 is overlooked in Chronicles, while v. 7 is elaborated on by (a) the annalistic excerpt in vv. 13-16, and (b) narratives centered around the prominent contemporary prophet Isaiah. These narratives were composed after Isaiah himself (xix. 37 refers to 681 BCE) and reappear, somewhat shortened and rearranged, in Isaiah xxxvi.-xxxix. (see Isaiah). Some parts are duplicates (compare xix. 7 with vv. 28, 33; vv. 10-13 with xviii. 28-35), and they consist of two sections, xviii. 17-xix. 8 (Isa. xxxvi. 2-xxxvii. 8) and xix. 9b-35 (Isa. xxxvii. 9b-36); there is debate about where xix. 9a and v. 36 seq. fit in. 2 Chronicles xxxii. (where these accounts are summarized) generally aligns with 2 Kings xviii. 7, in contrast to vv. 14-16. The poetic fragment, xix. 21-28, is associated with the sign in vv. 29-31; both seem to disrupt the connection between xix. 20 and 32 sqq. Chapter xx. 1-19 appears to belong to an earlier time in Hezekiah’s reign (see v. 6 and compare 2 Chronicles xxxii. 25 seq.); for vv. 1-11, carefully observe the forms in Isaiah xxxviii. 1-8, 21 seq., and 2 Chronicles xxxii. 24-26; for xx. 12-19 (Isa. xxxix) contrast the brief mention in 2 Chronicles xxxii. 31. In v. 17 seq., the exile is hinted at. It’s likely that a later collection of Isaiah stories was used; such a work is specifically referenced in 2 Chronicles xxxii. 32. The accounts of the regressive kings Manasseh and Amon, while compiled later, reference some political events (see xxi. 17, 23 seq.); xxi. 7-15 pertains to the exile and parallels xxiii. 26 seq., and xxi. 10 sqq. are replaced in 2 Chronicles xxxiii. 10-20 by a unique account of Manasseh’s repentance (see also ibid. v. 23 and note the omission of 2 Kings xxiii. 26 from Chronicles).
Josiah’s reign forms the climax of the history. The usual framework (xxii. 1; 2, xxiii. 28, 30b) is supplemented by narratives dealing with the Temple repairs and the reforms of Josiah. These are closely related to xi. seq. (cf. xxii. 3-7 with xii. 4 sqq.), but show many signs of revision; xxii. 16 seq., xxiii. 26 seq., point distinctly to the exile, and xxiii. 16-20 is an insertion (the altar in v. 16 is already destroyed in v. 15) after 1 Kings xiii. But it is difficult elsewhere to distinguish safely between the original records and the later additions. In their present shape the reforms of Josiah are described in terms that point to an acquaintance with the teaching of Deuteronomy which promulgates the reforms themselves.9
Josiah’s reign is the peak of the history. The usual structure (xxii. 1; 2, xxiii. 28, 30b) is enhanced by stories about the Temple repairs and Josiah's reforms. These are closely tied to xi. seq. (compare xxii. 3-7 with xii. 4 sqq.), but show many signs of edits; xxii. 16 seq., xxiii. 26 seq., clearly point to the exile, and xxiii. 16-20 is an addition (the altar in v. 16 is already destroyed in v. 15) after 1 Kings xiii. However, it’s difficult to reliably tell apart the original records from the later additions in other parts. In their current form, Josiah's reforms are described in a way that suggests familiarity with the teachings of Deuteronomy, which advocates the reforms themselves.9
The annalistic notice in xxiii. 29 seq. (contrast xxii. 20) should precede v. 28; 2 Chron. xxxv. 20-27 gives another version in the correct position and ignores 2 Kings xxiii. 24-27 (see however the Septuagint). For the last four kings of Judah, the references to the worship at the high places (presumably abolished by Josiah) are wanting, and the literary source is only cited for Jehoiakim; xxiv. 3 seq. (and probably v. 2), which treat the fall of Judah as the punishment for Manasseh’s sins, are a Deuteronomistic insertion (2 Chron. xxxvi. 6 sqq. differs widely; see, however, the Septuagint); v. 13 seq. and v. 15 seq. are duplicates. With xxiv. 18-xxv. 21 cf. Jer. lii. 1-27 (the text of the latter, especially vv. 19 sqq. is superior); and the fragments ibid. xxxix. 1-10. Ch. xxv. 22-26 appears in much fuller form in Jer. xl. seq. (see xl. 7-9, xli. 1-3, 17 seq.). It is noteworthy that Jeremiah does not enter into the history in Kings (contrast Isaiah above). The book of Chronicles in general has a briefer account of the last years, and ignores both the narratives which also appear in Jeremiah and the concluding hopeful note struck by the restoration of Jehoiachin (xxv. 27-30). This last, with the addition of statistical data, forms the present conclusion also of the book of Jeremiah.
The chronological note in xxiii. 29 and following (see also xxii. 20) should come before v. 28; 2 Chron. xxxv. 20-27 provides a different version in the right order and leaves out 2 Kings xxiii. 24-27 (but see the Septuagint). For the last four kings of Judah, references to worship at the high places (which were likely abolished by Josiah) are missing, and the literary source is only mentioned for Jehoiakim; xxiv. 3 and following (and probably v. 2), which view Judah's downfall as punishment for Manasseh's sins, are a Deuteronomistic addition (2 Chron. xxxvi. 6 and following varies significantly; refer to the Septuagint); v. 13 and v. 15 are duplicates. Compare xxiv. 18-xxv. 21 with Jer. lii. 1-27 (the text of the latter, especially vv. 19 and following is better); and the fragments ibid. xxxix. 1-10. Ch. xxv. 22-26 appears in much greater detail in Jer. xl. and following (see xl. 7-9, xli. 1-3, 17 and following). It's interesting to note that Jeremiah doesn't enter into the history in Kings (in contrast to Isaiah mentioned earlier). The book of Chronicles generally gives a shorter account of the final years and overlooks both the stories also found in Jeremiah and the hopeful conclusion regarding the restoration of Jehoiachin (xxv. 27-30). This last part, along with some statistical information, also forms the current conclusion of the book of Jeremiah.
Conclusions.—A survey of these narratives as a whole strengthens our impression of the merely mechanical character of the redaction by which they are united. Though editors have written something of their own in almost every chapter, generally from the standpoint of religious pragmatism, there is not the least attempt to work the materials into a history in our sense of the word; and in particular the northern and southern histories are practically independent, being merely pieced together in a sort of mosaic in consonance with the chronological system, which we have seen to be really later than the main redaction. It is very probable that the order of the pieces was considerably readjusted by the author of the chronology; of this indeed the Septuagint still shows traces. But with all its imperfections as judged from a modern standpoint, the redaction has the great merit of preserving material nearer to the actual history than would have been the case had narratives been rewritten from much later standpoints—as often in the book of Chronicles.
Conclusions.—Looking at these narratives overall reinforces our impression of the basic mechanical nature of the editing that brings them together. Although editors have added their own insights in almost every chapter, usually from a viewpoint focused on religious practicality, there is no real effort to turn the material into a coherent history as we understand it. Specifically, the northern and southern histories operate independently, merely stitched together like a mosaic according to a chronological framework, which we have noted is actually later than the main editing. It's quite possible that the order of the sections was significantly rearranged by the creator of the chronology; in fact, the Septuagint still shows signs of this. However, despite its flaws when viewed from a modern lens, the editing has the significant advantage of keeping material closer to the actual history than if the narratives had been rewritten from much later perspectives, as often seen in the book of Chronicles.
Questions of date and of the growth of the literary process are still unsettled, but it is clear that there was an independent history of (north) Israel with its own chronological scheme. It was based upon annals and fuller political records, and at some period apparently passed through circles where the purely domestic stories of the prophets (Elisha) were current.10 This was ultimately taken over by a Judaean editor who was under the influence of the far-reaching reforms ascribed to the 18th year of Josiah (621 B.C.). Certain passages seem to imply that in his time the Temple was still standing and the Davidic dynasty uninterrupted. Also the phrase “unto this day” sometimes apparently presupposes a pre-exilic date. On the other hand, the history is carried down to the end of Jehoiachin’s life (xxv. 27 refers to his fifty-fifth year, vv. 29 seq. look back on his death), and a number of allusions point decisively to the post-exilic period. Consequently, most scholars are agreed that an original pre-exilic Deuteronomic compilation made shortly after Josiah’s reforms received subsequent additions from a later Deuteronomic writer.
Questions about the timeline and growth of the literary process are still unresolved, but it's clear that (north) Israel had its own independent history with a unique chronological framework. This was based on records and more comprehensive political documents, and at some point, it seems like it went through groups where the purely local stories of the prophets (like Elisha) were popular. This was eventually taken over by a Judaean editor who was influenced by the extensive reforms attributed to the 18th year of Josiah (621 B.C.). Certain passages suggest that during his time, the Temple was still standing and the Davidic dynasty was intact. Additionally, the phrase “unto this day” seems to imply a date before the exile. However, the history continues up to the end of Jehoiachin’s life (xxv. 27 references his fifty-fifth year, and vv. 29 seq. reflect on his death), and several references clearly point to the post-exilic period. As a result, most scholars agree that an original pre-exilic Deuteronomic compilation created shortly after Josiah’s reforms received later additions from another Deuteronomic writer.
These questions depend upon several intricate literary and historical problems. At the outset (a) the compiler deals with history from the Deuteronomic standpoint, selecting certain notices and referring further to separate chronicles of Israel and Judah. The canonical book of Chronicles refers to such a combined work, but is confined to Judah; it follows the religious judgment passed upon the kings, but it introduces new details apparently derived from extant annals, replaces the annalistic excerpts found in Kings by other passages, or uses new narratives which at times are clearly based upon older sources. Next (b) the Septuagint proves that Kings did not reach its present form until a very late date; “each represents a stage and not always the same stage in the long protracted labours of the redactors” (Kuenen).11 In agreement with this are the unambiguous indications of the post-exilic age (especially in the Judaean history) consisting of complete passages, obvious interpolations, and also sporadic phrases in narratives whose pre-exilic origin is sometimes clear and sometimes only to be presumed. Further (c), the Septuagint supports the independent conclusion that the elaborate synchronisms belong to a late stage in the redaction. Consequently it is necessary to allow that the previous arrangement of the material may have been different; the actual wording of the introductory notices was necessarily also affected. In general, it becomes ever more difficult to distinguish between passages incorporated by an early redactor and those which may have been inserted later, though possibly from old sources. Where the regular framework is disturbed such considerations become more cogent. The relation of annalistic materials in 1 Sam. (xiii. i; xiv. 47-51, &c.) to the longer detailed narratives will bear upon the question, as also the relation of 2 Sam. ix-xx. to 1 Kings i. seq. (see Samuel, Books of). Again (d) the lengths of the reigns of the Judaean kings form an integral part of the framework, and their total, with fifty years of exile, allows four hundred and eighty years from the beginning of the Temple to the return from Babylon.12 This round number (cf. again 1 Kings vi. 1) points to a date subsequent to 537, and Robertson Smith has observed that almost all events dated by the years of the kings of Jerusalem have reference to the affairs of the Temple. This suggests a connexion between the chronology and the incorporation of those narratives in which the Temple is clearly the centre of interest. (e) But, apart from the question of the origin of the more detailed Judaean records, the arguments for a pre-exilic Judaean Deuteronomic compilation are not quite decisive. The phrase “unto this day” is not necessarily valid (cf. 2 Chron. v. 9, viii. 8, xxi. 10 with 1 Kings viii. 8, ix. 21, 2 Kings viii. 22), and depends largely upon the compiler’s sagacity. Also, the existence of the Temple and of the Davidic dynasty (1 Kings viii. 14-53; ix. 3; xi. 36-38; xv. 4; 2 Kings viii. 19; cf. 2 Chron. xiii. 5) is equally applicable to the time of the second temple when Zerubbabel, the Davidic representative, kindled new hopes and aspirations. Indeed, if the object of the Deuteronomic compiler is to show from past history that “the sovereign is responsible for the purity of the national religion” (Moore, Ency. Bib. col. 2079), a date somewhere after the death of Jehoiachin (released in 561) in the age of Zerubbabel and the new Temple equally satisfies the conditions. With this is concerned (f) the question whether, on historical grounds, the account of the introduction of Deuteronomic reforms by Josiah is trustworthy.13 Moreover, although a twofold Deuteronomic redaction of Kings is generally recognized, the criteria for the presumably pre-exilic form are not so decisive as those which certainly distinguish the post-exilic portions, and it is frequently very difficult to assign Deuteronomic passages to the earlier rather than to the later. Again, apart from the contrast between the Israelite detailed narratives (relatively early) and those of Judaean origin (often secondary), it is noteworthy that the sympathetic treatment of northern history in 2 Kings xiii. 4 seq. 23, xiv. 26 has literary parallels in the Deuteronomic redaction of Judges (where Israelite tradition is again predominant), but is quite distinct from the hostile feeling to the north which is also Deuteronomic. Even the northern prophet Hosea (q.v.) approximates the Deuteronomic standpoint, and the possibility that the first Deuteronomic compilation of Kings could originate outside Judah is 815 strengthened by the fact that an Israelite source could be drawn upon for an impartial account of Judaean history (2 Kings xiv. 8-15). Finally, (g) literary and historical problems here converge. Although Judaean writers ultimately rejected as heathen a people who could claim to be followers of Yahweh (Ezra iv. 2; 2 Kings xvii. 28, 33; contrast ibid. 34-40, a secondary insertion), the anti-Samaritan feeling had previously been at most only in an incipient stage, and there is reason to infer that relations between the peoples of north and south had been closer.14 The book of Kings reveals changing historical conditions in its literary features, and it is significant that the very age where the background is to be sought is that which has been (intentionally?) left most obscure: the chronicler’s history of the Judaean monarchy (Chron.—Ezra—Nehemiah), as any comparison will show, has its own representation of the course of events, and has virtually superseded both Kings and Jeremiah, which have now an abrupt conclusion. (See further S. A. Cook, Jew. Quart. Rev. (1907), pp. 158 sqq.; and the articles Jews: History, §§ 20, 22; Palestine: History).
These questions rely on several complex literary and historical issues. To start (a), the compiler looks at history from a Deuteronomic perspective, choosing specific accounts and referencing additional chronicles of Israel and Judah. The canonical book of Chronicles mentions such a combined work but is limited to Judah; it presents religious evaluations of the kings while adding new details seemingly taken from existing records, replacing the historical extracts in Kings with different passages or employing new stories that sometimes clearly draw from earlier sources. Next (b), the Septuagint indicates that Kings did not reach its current form until much later; “each reflects a phase and not necessarily the same phase in the extended efforts of the editors” (Kuenen).11 This aligns with the clear signs of the post-exilic period (especially in Judaean history) which include complete passages, obvious additions, and also sporadic phrases in narratives whose pre-exilic origins are sometimes clear and sometimes merely suggested. Furthermore (c), the Septuagint supports the separate conclusion that the detailed synchronisms belong to a later stage in the editing process. Therefore, it must be acknowledged that the earlier arrangement of the material may have been different; the actual wording of the introductory notes was inevitably affected. Overall, it becomes increasingly challenging to distinguish between passages added by an early editor and those that might have been inserted later, albeit possibly from old sources. Where the usual structure is disrupted, these considerations become more compelling. The relationship of historical materials in 1 Sam. (xiii. 1; xiv. 47-51, &c.) to the more detailed narratives will impact the discussion, as will the connection of 2 Sam. ix-xx. to 1 Kings i. seq. (see Samuel, Books of). Again (d), the lengths of the reigns of the Judaean kings are a crucial part of the framework, and their total, including fifty years of exile, accounts for four hundred and eighty years from the start of the Temple to the return from Babylon.12 This round number (cf. again 1 Kings vi. 1) points to a date after 537, and Robertson Smith has noted that almost all events recorded by the reigns of the kings of Jerusalem refer to the events of the Temple. This suggests a connection between the timeline and the narratives in which the Temple is evidently the main focus. (e) However, aside from the question of the origin of the more detailed Judaean records, the arguments for a pre-exilic Judaean Deuteronomic compilation are not completely conclusive. The phrase “until this day” is not necessarily valid (cf. 2 Chron. v. 9, viii. 8, xxi. 10 with 1 Kings viii. 8, ix. 21, 2 Kings viii. 22), and relies heavily on the compiler’s insight. Additionally, the presence of the Temple and the Davidic dynasty (1 Kings viii. 14-53; ix. 3; xi. 36-38; xv. 4; 2 Kings viii. 19; cf. 2 Chron. xiii. 5) is equally applicable to the time of the second temple when Zerubbabel, the representative of David, ignited new hopes and aspirations. Indeed, if the aim of the Deuteronomic compiler is to demonstrate from past history that “the ruler is accountable for the purity of the national religion” (Moore, Ency. Bib. col. 2079), a date sometime after the death of Jehoiachin (released in 561) during the time of Zerubbabel and the new Temple also fulfills the requirements. This links to (f) the question of whether, on historical grounds, the account of Josiah introducing Deuteronomic reforms is reliable.13 Moreover, while a two-part Deuteronomic editing of Kings is widely acknowledged, the criteria for the presumably pre-exilic version are not as definitive as those that clearly differentiate the post-exilic sections, and it is often quite challenging to assign Deuteronomic passages to the earlier rather than the later. Furthermore, aside from the difference between the detailed narratives from Israel (relatively early) and those of Judaean origin (often secondary), it’s notable that the favorable portrayal of northern history in 2 Kings xiii. 4 seq. 23, xiv. 26 has literary parallels in the Deuteronomic editing of Judges (where Israelite tradition again dominates), but is strikingly different from the hostile attitude towards the north that is also Deuteronomic. Even the northern prophet Hosea (q.v.) approaches the Deuteronomic viewpoint, and the possibility that the first Deuteronomic compilation of Kings could originate outside Judah is 815 bolstered by the fact that an Israelite source could be utilized for an unbiased account of Judaean history (2 Kings xiv. 8-15). Finally, (g) literary and historical problems converge here. Although Judaean writers eventually dismissed as heathen a group that could claim to be followers of Yahweh (Ezra iv. 2; 2 Kings xvii. 28, 33; contrast ibid. 34-40, a secondary insertion), the anti-Samaritan sentiment had previously been at most only in an early stage, and there is reason to infer that relations between the northern and southern peoples had been closer.14 The book of Kings exposes evolving historical conditions through its literary characteristics, and it is noteworthy that the very period where the background is to be found is that which has been (deliberately?) left most unclear: the chronicler’s account of the Judaean monarchy (Chron.—Ezra—Nehemiah), as any comparison will reveal, has its own depiction of events and has effectively overshadowed both Kings and Jeremiah, which now have an abrupt ending. (See further S. A. Cook, Jew. Quart. Rev. (1907), pp. 158 sqq.; and the articles Jews: History, §§ 20, 22; Palestine: History).
Literature.—A. Kuenen, Einleitung; J. Wellhausen, Compos. d. Hexateuch, pp. 266-302; H. Winckler, Alttest. Untersuchungen (1892); and B. Stade, Akademische Reden (1899; on 1 Kings v.-vii.; 2 Kings x.-xiv.; xv.-xxi.); S. R. Driver, Lit. of O. T. (1909); see also C. Holzhey, Das Buch. d. Könige (1899); the commentaries of Benzinger (1899) and Kittel (1900), and especially F. C. Kent, Israel’s Hist. and Biog. Narr. (1905). The article by W. R. Smith, Ency. Brit., 9th ed. (partly retained here), is revised and supplemented by E. Kautzsch in the Ency. Bib. For the Hebrew text see Klostermann’s Sam. u. Könige (1887); C. F. Burney, Notes on the Hebrew Text (1903); and Stade and Schwally’s edition in Haupt’s Sacred Books of the Old Testament (1904). For English readers, J. Skinner’s commentary in the Century Bible, and W. E. Barnes in the Cambridge Bible, are useful introductions.
Literature.—A. Kuenen, Introduction; J. Wellhausen, Composition of the Hexateuch, pp. 266-302; H. Winckler, Old Testament Studies (1892); and B. Stade, Academic Speeches (1899; on 1 Kings v.-vii.; 2 Kings x.-xiv.; xv.-xxi.); S. R. Driver, Literature of the Old Testament (1909); see also C. Holzhey, The Book of Kings (1899); the commentaries of Benzinger (1899) and Kittel (1900), and especially F. C. Kent, Israel’s Historical and Biographical Narratives (1905). The article by W. R. Smith, Encyclopedia Britannica, 9th ed. (partly retained here), is revised and supplemented by E. Kautzsch in the Encyclopedia Biblica. For the Hebrew text, see Klostermann’s Samuel and Kings (1887); C. F. Burney, Notes on the Hebrew Text (1903); and Stade and Schwally’s edition in Haupt’s Sacred Books of the Old Testament (1904). For English readers, J. Skinner’s commentary in the Century Bible, and W. E. Barnes in the Cambridge Bible, are useful introductions.
1 Cp. the brief annalistic form of the Babylonian chronicles (for a specimen, see C. F. Kent, Israel’s Hist. and Biog. Narratives, p. 502 seq.). For a synchronistic history of Assyria and Babylonia, prepared for diplomatic purposes, see Schrader’s Keilinschr. Bibl. i. 194 sqq.; also L. W. King, Studies in Eastern Hist. i. (Tukulti-Ninib), pp. i, 75 seq. (with interesting variant traditions).
1 For a concise historical account, refer to the Babylonian chronicles (for an example, see C. F. Kent, Israel’s Hist. and Biog. Narratives, p. 502 and following). For a chronological history of Assyria and Babylonia made for diplomatic purposes, check out Schrader’s Keilinschr. Bibl. i. 194 and onwards; also see L. W. King, Studies in Eastern Hist. i. (Tukulti-Ninib), pp. i, 75 and following (which includes some interesting variations in tradition).
2 The term “Israel” as applied to the northern kingdom is apt to be ambiguous, since as a general national name, with a religious significance, it can include or suggest the inclusion of Judah.
2 The term “Israel” used for the northern kingdom can be confusing, because as a national name with religious meaning, it might include or imply including Judah.
3 Here and elsewhere a careful study (e.g. of the marginal references in the Revised Version) will prove the close relation between the “Deuteronomic” passages and the book of Deuteronomy itself. The bearing of this upon the traditional date of that book should not be overlooked.
3 A detailed examination (e.g. of the marginal references in the Revised Version) will show the strong connection between the "Deuteronomic" sections and the book of Deuteronomy itself. This relationship should not be overlooked when considering the traditional date of that book.
4 See art. Jeroboam; also W. R. Smith, Old Test. in Jew. Church, pp. 117 sqq.; H. Winckler, Alttest. Untersuchungen, pp. 1 sqq., and the subsequent criticisms by C. F. Burney (Kings, pp. 163 sqq.); J. Skinner (Kings, pp. 443 sqq.); and Ed. Meyer (Israeliten u. Nachbarstämme, pp. 357 sqq.).
4 See art. Jeroboam; also W. R. Smith, Old Test. in Jew. Church, pp. 117 and following; H. Winckler, Alttest. Untersuchungen, pp. 1 and following, and the later critiques by C. F. Burney (Kings, pp. 163 and following); J. Skinner (Kings, pp. 443 and following); and Ed. Meyer (Israeliten u. Nachbarstämme, pp. 357 and following).
5 Notice should everywhere be taken of those prophetical stories which have the linguistic features of the Deuteronomic writers, or which differ in style and expression from the prophecies of Amos, Hosea and others, previous to Jeremiah.
5 Attention should be paid everywhere to those prophetic stories that share the linguistic traits of the Deuteronomic writers or differ in style and expression from the prophecies of Amos, Hosea, and others prior to Jeremiah.
6 The division of the two books at this point is an innovation first made in the LXX. and Vulgate.
6 The separation of the two books at this point is a change first introduced in the LXX and Vulgate.
7 Both xiv. 22 and xv. 5 presuppose fuller records of which 2 Chron. xxvi. 6-7, 16-20 may represent merely later and less trustworthy versions.
7 Both xiv. 22 and xv. 5 assume more complete records, of which 2 Chron. xxvi. 6-7, 16-20 may only reflect later and less reliable versions.
9 See further the special study by E. Day, Journ. Bib. Lit. (1902), pp. 197 sqq.
9 For more, see the special study by E. Day, Journ. Bib. Lit. (1902), pp. 197 and following.
10 Cf. similarly the prophetic narratives in the books of Samuel (q.v.).
10 See also the prophetic stories in the books of Samuel (q.v.).
11 “The LXX. of Kings is not a corrupt reproduction of the Hebrew receptus, but represents another recension of the text. Neither recension can claim absolute superiority. The defects of the LXX. lie on the surface, and are greatly aggravated by the condition of the Greek text, which has suffered much in transmission, and particularly has in many places been corrected after the later Greek versions that express the Hebrew receptus of the 2nd century of our era. Yet the LXX. not only preserves many good readings in detail, but throws much light on the long-continued process of redaction at the hand of successive editors or copyists of which the extant Hebrew of Kings is the outcome. Even the false readings of the Greek are instructive, for both recensions were exposed to corrupting influences of precisely the same kind” (W. R. Smith).
11 “The LXX of Kings is not an incorrect version of the Hebrew receptus, but rather represents a different version of the text. Neither version can claim to be absolutely superior. The flaws in the LXX are obvious and are made worse by the state of the Greek text, which has been heavily affected by transmission, and in many instances has been corrected based on later Greek versions that reflect the Hebrew receptus from the 2nd century of our era. However, the LXX not only keeps many good readings in detail, but also sheds light on the extended process of editing done by successive editors or copyists that resulted in the existing Hebrew of Kings. Even the incorrect readings in Greek provide valuable insight, as both versions were subjected to the same types of corrupting influences” (W. R. Smith).
12 See W. R. Smith, Journ. of Philology, x. 209 sqq.; Prophets of Israel, p. 147. seq.; and K. Marti, Ency. Bib. art. “Chronology.”
12 See W. R. Smith, Journ. of Philology, x. 209 sqq.; Prophets of Israel, p. 147. seq.; and K. Marti, Ency. Bib. art. “Chronology.”
13 Against earlier doubts by Havet (1878), Vernes (1887) and Horst (1888), see W. E. Addis, Documents of Hexateuch, ii. 2 sqq.; but the whole question has been reopened by E. Day (loc. cit. above) and R. H. Kennett (Journ. Theol. Stud., July 1906, 481 sqq.).
13 Contrary to previous doubts raised by Havet (1878), Vernes (1887), and Horst (1888), see W. E. Addis, Documents of Hexateuch, ii. 2 sqq.; however, the entire issue has been reexamined by E. Day (loc. cit. above) and R. H. Kennett (Journ. Theol. Stud., July 1906, 481 sqq.).
14 See Kennett. Journ. Theol. Stud. 1905, pp. 169 sqq.; 1906, pp. 488 sqq.; and cf. J. A. Montgomery, The Samaritans (1907), pp. 47, 53 seq., 57, 59, 61 sqq.
14 See Kennett. Journ. Theol. Stud. 1905, pp. 169 and following; 1906, pp. 488 and following; and see also J. A. Montgomery, The Samaritans (1907), pp. 47, 53 and following, 57, 59, 61 and following.

KING’S BENCH, COURT OF, in England, one of the superior courts of common law. This court, the most ancient of English courts—in its correct legal title, “the court of the king before the king himself,” coram ipso rege—is far older than parliament itself, for it can be traced back clearly, both in character and the essence of its jurisdiction, to the reign of King Alfred. The king’s bench, and the two offshoots of the aula regia, the common pleas and the exchequer, for many years possessed co-ordinate jurisdiction, although there were a few cases in which each had exclusive authority, and in point of dignity precedence was given to the court of king’s bench, the lord chief justice of which was also styled lord chief justice of England, being the highest permanent judge of the Crown. The court of exchequer attended to the business of the revenue, the common pleas to private actions between citizens, and the king’s bench retained criminal cases and such other jurisdiction as had not been divided between the other two courts. By an act of 1830 the court of exchequer chamber was constituted as a court of appeal for errors in law in all three courts. Like the court of exchequer, the king’s bench assumed by means of an ingenious fiction the jurisdiction in civil matters which properly belonged to the common pleas.
KING'S BENCH, COURT OF, in England, is one of the top courts of common law. This court, the oldest of English courts—in its official legal title, “the court of the king before the king himself,” coram ipso rege—is much older than parliament, dating back clearly, both in character and the essence of its jurisdiction, to the reign of King Alfred. The king’s bench, along with its two branches from the aula regia, the common pleas and the exchequer, had co-equal jurisdiction for many years, though there were some cases where each had exclusive authority. In terms of dignity, the court of king's bench took precedence, with its lord chief justice also referred to as the lord chief justice of England, being the highest permanent judge of the Crown. The court of exchequer handled revenue matters, the common pleas dealt with private disputes between citizens, and the king’s bench retained criminal cases along with other jurisdiction not assigned to the other two courts. An act in 1830 established the court of exchequer chamber as a court of appeal for legal errors from all three courts. Similar to the court of exchequer, the king’s bench cleverly assumed jurisdiction in civil matters that rightfully belonged to the common pleas.
Under the Judicature Act 1873 the court of king’s bench became the king’s bench division of the High Court of Justice. It consists of the lord chief justice and fourteen puisne judges. It exercises original jurisdiction and also appellate jurisdiction from the county courts and other inferior courts. By the act of 1873 (sec. 45) this appellate jurisdiction is conferred upon the High Court generally, but in practice it is exercised by a divisional court of the king’s bench division only. The determination of such appeals by the High Court is final, unless leave to appeal is given by the court which heard the appeal or by the court of appeal. There was an exception to this rule as regards certain orders of quarter sessions, the history of which involves some complication. But by sec. 1 (5) of the Court of Session Act 1894 the rule applies to all cases where there is a right of appeal to the High Court from any court or person. It may be here mentioned that if leave is given to appeal to the court of appeal there is a further appeal to the House of Lords, except in bankruptcy (Bankruptcy Appeals (County Courts) Act 1884), when the decision of the court of appeal on appeal from a divisional court sitting in appeal is made final and conclusive.
Under the Judicature Act 1873, the court of king’s bench became the king’s bench division of the High Court of Justice. It includes the lord chief justice and fourteen puisne judges. It has original jurisdiction and also hears appeals from the county courts and other lower courts. According to the act of 1873 (sec. 45), this appellate jurisdiction is generally given to the High Court, but in practice, it's handled by a divisional court of the king’s bench division only. The High Court's decisions on these appeals are final unless the court that heard the appeal or the court of appeal grants permission to appeal. There was an exception to this rule regarding certain quarter sessions orders, which have a complicated history. However, by sec. 1 (5) of the Court of Session Act 1894, the rule applies to all cases where there is a right to appeal to the High Court from any court or individual. It's worth noting that if permission is granted to appeal to the court of appeal, there is a further opportunity to appeal to the House of Lords, except in bankruptcy cases (Bankruptcy Appeals (County Courts) Act 1884), where the court of appeal's decision on an appeal from a divisional court is final and conclusive.
There are masters in the king’s bench division. Unlike the masters in the chancery division, they have original jurisdiction, and are not attached to any particular judge. They hear applications in chambers, act as taxing masters and occasionally as referees to conduct inquiries, take accounts, and assess damages. There is an appeal from the master to the judge in chambers. Formerly there was an appeal from the judge in chambers to a divisional court in every case and thence to the court of appeal, until the multiplication of appeals in small interlocutory matters became a scandal. Under the Supreme Court of Judicature (Procedure) Act 1894 there is no right of appeal to the court of appeal in any interlocutory matters (except those mentioned in subs. (b)) without the leave of the judge or of the court of appeal, and in matters of “practice and procedure” the appeal lies (with leave) directly to the court of appeal from the judge in chambers.
There are masters in the king’s bench division. Unlike the masters in the chancery division, they have original jurisdiction and are not assigned to any specific judge. They hear applications in chambers, serve as taxing masters, and occasionally act as referees to conduct inquiries, take accounts, and assess damages. There is an appeal from the master to the judge in chambers. Previously, there was an appeal from the judge in chambers to a divisional court in every case and then to the court of appeal until the excessive number of appeals in minor interlocutory matters became a problem. Under the Supreme Court of Judicature (Procedure) Act 1894, there is no right of appeal to the court of appeal in any interlocutory matters (except those mentioned in subs. (b)) without the permission of the judge or the court of appeal, and in matters of “practice and procedure,” the appeal goes (with permission) directly to the court of appeal from the judge in chambers.

KINGSBRIDGE, a market town in the Totnes parliamentary division of Devonshire, England, 48 m. S.S.W. of Exeter, on a branch of the Great Western railway. Pop. of urban district (1901), 3025. It lies 6 m. from the English Channel, at the head of an inlet or estuary which receives only small streams, on a sharply sloping site. The church of St Edmund is mainly Perpendicular, but there are Transitional Norman and Early English portions. The town-hall contains a natural history museum. A house called Pindar Lodge stands on the site of the birthplace of John Wolcot (“Peter Pindar,” 1738-1819). William Cookworthy (1705-1780), a porcelain manufacturer, the first to exploit the deposits of kaolin in the south-west of England, was also born at Kingsbridge. The township of Dodbrooke, included within the civil parish, adjoins Kingsbridge on the north-east. Some iron-founding and ship-building, with a coasting trade, are carried on.
KINGSBRIDGE, is a market town in the Totnes parliamentary division of Devon, England, located 48 miles south-southwest of Exeter, on a branch of the Great Western railway. The population of the urban district was 3,025 in 1901. It is 6 miles from the English Channel, at the head of an inlet or estuary that only takes in small streams, situated on a steep slope. The church of St Edmund is mainly in the Perpendicular style, but it also has parts from the Transitional Norman and Early English periods. The town hall houses a natural history museum. A place called Pindar Lodge is on the site where John Wolcot (“Peter Pindar,” 1738-1819) was born. William Cookworthy (1705-1780), a porcelain maker who was the first to utilize the kaolin deposits in southwest England, was also born in Kingsbridge. The neighboring township of Dodbrooke, which is part of the civil parish, lies to the northeast of Kingsbridge. There are some iron founding and shipbuilding activities, along with a coastal trade.
Kingsbridge (Kyngysbrygge) was formerly included in the manor of Churchstow, the first trace of its separate existence being found in the Hundred Roll of 1276, which records that in the manor of Churchstow there is a new borough, which has a Friday market and a separate assize of bread and ale. The name Kingsbridge however does not appear till half a century later. When Kingsbridge became a separate parish is not certainly known, but it was before 1414 when the church was rebuilt and consecrated to St Edmund. In 1461 the abbot of Buckfastleigh obtained a Saturday market at Kingsbridge and a three-days’ fair at the feast of St Margaret, both of which are still held. The manor remained in possession of the abbot until the Dissolution, when it was granted to Sir William Petre. Kingsbridge was never represented in parliament or incorporated by charter, the government being by a portreeve, and down to the present day the steward of the manor holds a court leet and court baron and appoints a portreeve and constables. In 1798 the town mills were converted into a woollen manufactory, which up to recent times produced large quantities of cloth, and the serge manufacture was introduced early in the 19th century. The town has been famous from remote times for a beverage called “white ale.” Included in Kingsbridge is the little town of Dodbrooke, which at the time of the Domesday Survey had a population of 42, and a flock of 108 sheep and 27 goats; and in 1257 was granted a Wednesday market and a fair at the Feast of St Mary Magdalene.
Kingsbridge (Kyngysbrygge) used to be part of the Churchstow manor, with the first record of it as a separate place appearing in the Hundred Roll of 1276. This document notes that there is a new borough in the Churchstow manor that has a Friday market and its own regulations for bread and ale. However, the name Kingsbridge doesn't show up until about fifty years later. It's unclear exactly when Kingsbridge became its own parish, but it was before 1414, when the church was rebuilt and dedicated to St Edmund. In 1461, the abbot of Buckfastleigh secured a Saturday market at Kingsbridge and a three-day fair during the feast of St Margaret, both of which still happen today. The manor stayed with the abbot until the Dissolution, when it was given to Sir William Petre. Kingsbridge was never represented in parliament or officially established by charter; instead, it was governed by a portreeve. Even today, the steward of the manor holds a court leet and court baron and appoints a portreeve and constables. In 1798, the town mills were turned into a woolen factory, which, until recently, produced large amounts of cloth, and serge manufacturing began in the early 19th century. The town has been well-known for a drink called “white ale” since ancient times. Kingsbridge also includes the small town of Dodbrooke, which had a population of 42 at the time of the Domesday Survey, along with a flock of 108 sheep and 27 goats; and in 1257, it was granted a Wednesday market and a fair during the Feast of St Mary Magdalene.
See “Victoria County History”: Devonshire; Kingsbridge and Sulcombe, with the intermediate Estuary, historically and topographically depicted (Kingsbridge, 1819); S. F. Fox, Kingsbridge Estuary (Kingsbridge, 1864).
See “Victoria County History”: Devonshire; Kingsbridge and Sulcombe, with the intermediate Estuary, historically and topographically depicted (Kingsbridge, 1819); S. F. Fox, Kingsbridge Estuary (Kingsbridge, 1864).

KING’S COUNTY, a county of Ireland in the province of Leinster, bounded N. by Meath and Westmeath, W. by Roscommon, Galway and Tipperary (the boundary with the first two counties being the river Shannon); S. by Tipperary and Queen’s County, and E. by Kildare. The area is 493,999 acres or about 772 sq. m. The greater part of the county is included in the central plain of Ireland. In the south-east the Slieve Bloom Mountains form the 816 boundary between King’s County and Queen’s County, and run into the former county from south-west to north-east for a distance of about 20 m. consisting of a mass of lofty and precipitous crags through which there are two narrow passes, the Black Gap and the Gap of Glandine. In the north-east Croghan Hill, a beautiful green eminence, rises to a height over 700 ft. The remainder of the county is flat, but a range of low hills crosses its north-eastern division to the north of the Barrow. In the centre of the county from east to west a large portion is occupied by the Bog of Allen. The county shares in the advantage of the navigation of the Shannon, which skirts its western side. The Brosna, which issues from Loch Ennell in Westmeath, enters the county near the town of Clara, and flowing south-westwards across its north-west corner, discharges itself into the Shannon after receiving the Clodagh and the Broughill. A small portion of the north-eastern extremity is skirted by the upper Boyne. The Barrow forms the south-eastern boundary with Queen’s County. The Little Brosna, which rises in the Slieve Bloom Mountains, forms the boundary of King’s County with Tipperary, and falls into the Shannon.
KING’S COUNTY, is a county in Ireland's Leinster province, bordered to the north by Meath and Westmeath, to the west by Roscommon, Galway, and Tipperary (with the river Shannon marking the boundary with the first two counties); to the south by Tipperary and Queen’s County, and to the east by Kildare. The area covers 493,999 acres, which is about 772 square miles. Most of the county is part of Ireland's central plain. In the southeast, the Slieve Bloom Mountains create the boundary between King’s County and Queen’s County, extending into King’s County from the southwest to the northeast over approximately 20 miles, featuring a series of high and steep cliffs that include two narrow passes, the Black Gap and the Gap of Glandine. In the northeast, Croghan Hill, a lovely green hill, rises to over 700 feet. The rest of the county is mostly flat, but a range of low hills crosses the northeastern section to the north of the Barrow. In the center of the county, running from east to west, a significant area is taken up by the Bog of Allen. The county benefits from the navigation of the Shannon, which runs along its western edge. The Brosna River, which flows from Loch Ennell in Westmeath, enters the county near Clara and travels southwest across its northwest corner, eventually flowing into the Shannon after collecting the Clodagh and the Broughill rivers. A small section of the northeastern tip is bordered by the upper Boyne. The Barrow creates the southeastern boundary with Queen’s County. The Little Brosna, which rises in the Slieve Bloom Mountains, marks the boundary between King’s County and Tipperary before merging into the Shannon.
This county lies in the great Carboniferous Limestone plain, with clay-soils and bogs upon its surface, and many drier deposits of esker-gravels rising as green hills above the general level. The Slieve Bloom Mountains, consisting of Old Red Sandstone with Silurian inliers, form a bold feature in the south. North of Philipstown, the prominent mass of Croghan Hill is formed of basic volcanic rocks contemporaneous with the Carboniferous Limestone, and comparable with those in Co. Limerick.
This county is located in the vast Carboniferous Limestone plain, featuring clay soils and bogs on its surface, along with several drier deposits of esker gravels that rise like green hills above the surrounding area. The Slieve Bloom Mountains, made up of Old Red Sandstone with Silurian inliers, create a striking landscape to the south. Just north of Philipstown, the notable Croghan Hill consists of basic volcanic rocks that were formed around the same time as the Carboniferous Limestone and are similar to those found in County Limerick.
Notwithstanding the large area occupied by bogs, the climate is generally healthy, and less moist than that of several neighbouring districts. The whole of the county would appear to have been covered formerly by a vast forest, and the district bordering on Tipperary is still richly wooded. The soil naturally is not of great fertility except in special cases, but is capable of being rendered so by the judicious application of bog and lime manures according to its special defects. It is generally either a deep bog or a shallow gravelly loam. On the borders of the Slieve Bloom Mountains there are some very rich and fertile pastures, and there are also extensive grazing districts on the borders of Westmeath, which are chiefly occupied by sheep. Along the banks of the Shannon there are some fine tracts of meadow land. With the exception of the tract occupied by the Bog of Allen, the remainder of the county is nearly all under tillage, the most productive portion being that to the north-west of the Hill of Croghan. The percentage of tillage to pasture is roughly as 1 to 2¼. Oats, barley and rye, potatoes and turnips, are all considerably grown; wheat is almost neglected, and the acreage of all crops has a decreasing tendency. Cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry are bred increasingly; dairies are numerous in the north of the county, and the sheep are pastured chiefly in the hilly districts.
Despite the large area taken up by bogs, the climate is generally healthy and less humid than that of several neighboring regions. It seems the entire county was once covered by a vast forest, and the area near Tipperary is still richly wooded. The soil isn't very fertile overall, except in some cases, but it can be improved with the proper use of bog and lime fertilizers tailored to its specific needs. The terrain is usually either deep bog or shallow gravelly loam. Near the Slieve Bloom Mountains, there are some very rich and fertile pastures, and there are also large grazing areas near Westmeath, mainly used for sheep. Along the banks of the Shannon, there are beautiful stretches of meadow land. Except for the area taken up by the Bog of Allen, almost the entire county is under tillage, with the most productive part located to the northwest of the Hill of Croghan. The ratio of tillage to pasture is roughly 1 to 2¼. Oats, barley, rye, potatoes, and turnips are grown in significant amounts; wheat is almost ignored, and the acreage for all crops is gradually decreasing. Cattle, sheep, pigs, and poultry are increasingly raised; dairies are plentiful in the northern part of the county, and the sheep mainly graze in the hilly areas.
The county is traversed from S.E. to N.W. by the Portarlington, Tullamore, Clara and Athlone line of the Great Southern and Western railway, with a branch from Clara to Banagher; from Roscrea (Co. Tipperary) a branch of this company runs to Parsonstown (Birr); while the Midland Great Western has branches from its main line from Enfield (Co. Kildare) to Edenderry, and from Streamstown (Co. Westmeath) to Clara. The Grand Canal runs through the length of the county from east to west, entering the Shannon at Shannon harbour.
The county is crossed from southeast to northwest by the Portarlington, Tullamore, Clara, and Athlone line of the Great Southern and Western railway, with a branch from Clara to Banagher. There's also a branch from Roscrea (Co. Tipperary) that goes to Parsonstown (Birr). Meanwhile, the Midland Great Western has branches from its main line running from Enfield (Co. Kildare) to Edenderry, and from Streamstown (Co. Westmeath) to Clara. The Grand Canal runs the entire length of the county from east to west, entering the Shannon at Shannon Harbour.
The population (65,563 in 1891; 60,187 in 1901), decreasing through emigration, includes about 89% of Roman Catholics. The decrease is rather below the average. The chief towns are Tullamore (the county town, pop. 4639) and Birr or Parsonstown (4438), with Edenderry and Clara. Philipstown near Tullamore was formerly the capital of the county and was the centre of the kingdom of Offaly. The county comprises 12 baronies and 46 civil parishes. It returns two members to parliament, for the Birr and Tullamore divisions respectively. Previous to the Union, King’s County returned six members to parliament, two for the county, and two for each of the boroughs of Philipstown and Banagher. Assizes are held at Tullamore and quarter sessions at Parsonstown, Philipstown and Tullamore. The county is divided into the Protestant dioceses of Killaloe, Meath and Ossory; and the Roman Catholic dioceses of Ardagh, Kildare and Leighlin, Ossory and Clonfert.
The population (65,563 in 1891; 60,187 in 1901), declining due to emigration, is about 89% Roman Catholic. The decrease is slightly below average. The main towns are Tullamore (the county town, pop. 4,639) and Birr or Parsonstown (4,438), along with Edenderry and Clara. Philipstown near Tullamore was once the county's capital and the center of the kingdom of Offaly. The county consists of 12 baronies and 46 civil parishes. It has two representatives in parliament, one for the Birr division and another for the Tullamore division. Before the Union, King’s County had six parliament members, two for the county and two for each of the boroughs of Philipstown and Banagher. Assizes take place in Tullamore, while quarter sessions are held in Parsonstown, Philipstown, and Tullamore. The county is divided between the Protestant dioceses of Killaloe, Meath, and Ossory; and the Roman Catholic dioceses of Ardagh, Kildare and Leighlin, Ossory, and Clonfert.
King’s County, with portions of Tipperary, Queen’s County and Kildare, at an early period formed one kingdom under the name of Offaly, a title which it retained after the landing of the English. Subsequently it was known as Glenmallery, Western Glenmallery pretty nearly corresponding to the present King’s County, and Eastern Glenmallery to Queen’s County. By a statute of 1556 the western district was constituted a shire under the name of King’s County in honour of Philip, consort of Queen Mary—the principal town, formerly the seat of the O’Connors, being called Philipstown; and the eastern district at the same time received the name of Queen’s County in honour of Mary. Perhaps the oldest antiquarian relic is the large pyramid of white stones in the Slieve Bloom Mountains called the Temple of the Sun or the White Obelisk. There are a considerable number of Danish raths, and a chain of moats commanding the passes of the bogs extended throughout the county. On the borders of Tipperary is an ancient causeway leading presumably to a crannog or lake-dwelling. The most important ecclesiastical ruins are those of the seven churches of Clonmacnoise (q.v.) on the Shannon in the north-west of the county, where an abbey was founded by St Kieran in 648, and where the remains include those of churches, two round towers, crosses, inscribed stones and a castle. Among the more famous religious houses in addition to Clonmacnoise were Durrow Abbey, founded by St Columba in 550; Monasteroris founded in the 14th century by John Bermingham, earl of Louth; and Seirkyran Abbey, founded in the beginning of the 5th century. The principal old castles are Rathmore, probably the most ancient in the county; Banagher, commanding an important pass on the Shannon; Leap Castle, in the Slieve Bloom Mountains; and Birr or Parsonstown, now the seat of the earl of Rosse.
King’s County, along with parts of Tipperary, Queen’s County, and Kildare, originally formed one kingdom called Offaly, a name it kept after the English arrived. Later, it was referred to as Glenmallery, with Western Glenmallery closely matching what is now King’s County and Eastern Glenmallery corresponding to Queen’s County. In 1556, a law established the western area as a shire named King’s County in honor of Philip, the husband of Queen Mary—the main town, once the home of the O’Connors, was named Philipstown; at the same time, the eastern area received the name Queen’s County to honor Mary. One of the oldest historical artifacts is the large pyramid of white stones in the Slieve Bloom Mountains known as the Temple of the Sun or the White Obelisk. There are many Danish raths, and a series of moats that oversee the bog passes can be found throughout the county. At the border with Tipperary, there’s an ancient causeway that likely leads to a crannog or lake-dwelling. The most significant ecclesiastical ruins are the seven churches of Clonmacnoise (q.v.) located on the Shannon in the northwest part of the county, where St. Kieran founded an abbey in 648; the ruins include churches, two round towers, crosses, inscribed stones, and a castle. Besides Clonmacnoise, other notable religious houses include Durrow Abbey, established by St. Columba in 550; Monasteroris, founded in the 14th century by John Bermingham, Earl of Louth; and Seirkyran Abbey, which began in the early 5th century. The main old castles are Rathmore, likely the oldest in the county; Banagher, which oversees an important pass on the Shannon; Leap Castle, situated in the Slieve Bloom Mountains; and Birr, also known as Parsonstown, which is now the residence of the Earl of Rosse.

KINGSDOWN, THOMAS PEMBERTON LEIGH, Baron (1793-1867), the eldest son of Thomas Pemberton, a chancery barrister, was born in London on the 11th of February 1793. He was called to the bar at Lincoln’s Inn in 1816, and at once acquired a lucrative equity practice. He sat in parliament for Rye (1831-1832) and for Ripon (1835-1843). He was made a king’s counsel in 1829. Of a retiring disposition, he seldom took part in parliamentary debates, although in 1838 in the case of Stockdale v. Hansard he took a considerable part in upholding the privileges of parliament. In 1841 he accepted the post of attorney-general for the duchy of Cornwall. In 1842 a relative, Sir Robert H. Leigh, left him a life interest in his Wigan estates, amounting to some £15,000 a year; he then assumed the additional surname of Leigh. Having accepted the chancellorship of the duchy of Cornwall and a privy councillorship, he became a member of the judicial committee of the privy council, and for nearly twenty years devoted his energies and talents to the work of that body; his judgments, more particularly in prize cases, of which he took especial charge, are remarkable not only for legal precision and accuracy, but for their form and expression. In 1858, on the formation of Lord Derby’s administration, he was offered the Great Seal, but declined; in the same year, however, he was raised to the peerage as Baron Kingsdown. He died at his seat, Lorry Hill, near Sittingbourne, Kent, on the 7th of October 1867. Lord Kingsdown never married, and his title became extinct.
KINGSDOWN, THOMAS PEMBERTON LEIGH, Baron (1793-1867), the oldest son of Thomas Pemberton, a chancery barrister, was born in London on February 11, 1793. He was called to the bar at Lincoln’s Inn in 1816 and immediately established a successful equity practice. He served in parliament for Rye (1831-1832) and for Ripon (1835-1843). He became a king’s counsel in 1829. Of a reserved nature, he rarely participated in parliamentary debates, although in 1838, in the case of Stockdale v. Hansard, he played a significant role in defending the privileges of parliament. In 1841, he accepted the position of attorney-general for the duchy of Cornwall. In 1842, a relative, Sir Robert H. Leigh, left him a life interest in his Wigan estates, worth about £15,000 a year; he then took on the additional surname of Leigh. After accepting the chancellorship of the duchy of Cornwall and a privy councillorship, he became a member of the judicial committee of the privy council, dedicating nearly twenty years to the work of that body; his judgments, especially in prize cases which he oversaw closely, are noted for their legal precision and accuracy, as well as their form and expression. In 1858, when Lord Derby’s administration was formed, he was offered the Great Seal but declined; however, that same year, he was elevated to the peerage as Baron Kingsdown. He passed away at his estate, Lorry Hill, near Sittingbourne, Kent, on October 7, 1867. Lord Kingsdown never married, and his title became extinct.
See Recollections of Life at the Bar and in Parliament, by Lord Kingsdown (privately printed for friends, 1868); The Times (8th of October 1867).
See Recollections of Life at the Bar and in Parliament, by Lord Kingsdown (privately printed for friends, 1868); The Times (October 8, 1867).

KING’S EVIL, an old, but not yet obsolete, name given to the scrofula, which in the popular estimation was deemed capable of cure by the royal touch. The practice of “touching” for the scrofula, or “King’s Evil,” was confined amongst the nations of Europe to the two Royal Houses of England and France. As the monarchs of both these countries owned the exclusive right of being anointed with the pure chrism, and not with the ordinary sacred oil, it has been surmised that the common belief in the sanctity of the chrism was in some manner inseparably connected 817 with faith in the healing powers of the royal touch. The kings both of France and England claimed a sole and special right to this supernatural gift: the house of France deducing its origin from Clovis (5th century) and that of England declaring Edward th e Confessor the first owner of this virtue. That the Saxon origin of the royal power of healing was the popular theory in England is evident from the striking and accurate description of the ceremony in Macbeth (act vi. scene iii.). Nevertheless the practice of this rite cannot be traced back to an earlier date than the reign of Edward III. in England, and of St Louis (Louis IX.) in France; consequently, it is believed that the performance of healing by the touch emanated in the first instance from the French Crusader-King, whose miraculous powers were subsequently transmitted to his descendant and representative, Isabella of Valois, wife of Edward II. of England. In any case, Queen Isabella’s son and heir, Edward III., claimant to the French throne through his mother, was the first English king to order a public display of an attribute that had hitherto been associated with the Valois kings alone. From his reign dates the use of the “touch-piece,” a gold medal given to the sufferer as a kind of talisman, which was originally the angel coin, stamped with designs of St Michael and of a three-masted ship.
KING’S EVIL, is an old term still in use, referring to scrofula, which was popularly believed to be curable by the royal touch. The practice of “touching” for scrofula, or “King’s Evil,” was limited to the Royal Houses of England and France. Since the monarchs of both countries had the exclusive right to be anointed with pure chrism, rather than the usual sacred oil, it’s thought that the common belief in the sanctity of the chrism was closely linked to faith in the healing powers of the royal touch. The kings of both France and England claimed a unique right to this supernatural gift: the French monarchy traced its origin back to Clovis (5th century), while England pointed to Edward the Confessor as the first holder of this virtue. The belief that the royal power of healing had Saxon origins is clear from the vivid and accurate depiction of the ceremony in Macbeth (act vi. scene iii.). However, the practice of this rite can only be traced back to the reign of Edward III in England and St. Louis (Louis IX) in France; thus, it is thought that the healing through touch initially came from the French Crusader-King, whose miraculous abilities were later passed down to his descendant, Isabella of Valois, who was married to Edward II of England. Regardless, Queen Isabella’s son and heir, Edward III, who laid claim to the French throne through his mother, was the first English king to publicly display this attribute, which had been associated only with the Valois kings until then. This marks the beginning of the use of the “touch-piece,” a gold medal given to the afflicted as a sort of talisman, which originally featured the angel coin, stamped with images of St. Michael and a three-masted ship.
The actual ceremony seems first to have consisted of the sovereign’s personal act of washing the diseased flesh with water, but under Henry VII. the use of an ablution was omitted, and a regular office was drawn up for insertion in the Service Book. At the “Ceremonies for the Healing” the king now merely touched his afflicted subject in the presence of the court chaplain who offered up certain prayers and afterwards presented the touch-piece, pierced so that it might be suspended by a ribbon round the patient’s neck. Henry VII.’s office was henceforth issued with variations from time to time under successive kings, nor did it disappear from certain editions of the Book of Common Prayer until the middle of the 18th century. The practice of the Royal Healing seems to have reached the height of its popularity during the reign of Charles II., who is stated on good authority to have touched over 100,000 strumous persons. So great a number of applicants becoming a nuisance to the Court, it was afterwards enacted that special certificates should in future be granted to individuals demanding the touch, and such certificates are occasionally to be found amongst old parish registers of the close of the 17th century. After the Revolution, William of Orange refused to touch, and referred all applicants to the exiled James II. at St Germain; but Queen Anne touched frequently, one of her patients being Dr Samuel Johnson in his infancy. The Hanoverian kings declined to touch, and there exists no further record of any ceremony of healing henceforward at the English court. The practice, however, was continued by the exiled Stuarts, and was constantly performed in Italy by James Stuart, “the Old Pretender,” and by his two sons, Charles and Henry (Cardinal York).
The actual ceremony initially involved the sovereign personally washing the infected area with water, but during Henry VII's reign, the washing was dropped, and a standard procedure was created for inclusion in the Service Book. In the “Ceremonies for the Healing,” the king now simply touched his afflicted subject in front of the court chaplain, who would say specific prayers and then give the touch-piece, which had a hole for a ribbon so it could be worn around the patient’s neck. Henry VII's procedure was modified and reissued under successive kings, and it didn't fully disappear from certain editions of the Book of Common Prayer until the mid-18th century. The practice of Royal Healing peaked during Charles II’s reign, when he reportedly touched over 100,000 people with scrofula. The large number of applicants became a nuisance at the Court, leading to a new rule that special certificates would be issued to those requesting the touch, and such certificates are occasionally found in old parish registers from the late 17th century. After the Revolution, William of Orange refused to perform the touch, directing all applicants to the exiled James II in St. Germain; however, Queen Anne frequently touched patients, including Dr. Samuel Johnson when he was a child. The Hanoverian kings chose not to perform the touch, and there are no further records of healing ceremonies at the English court after that. Nevertheless, this practice continued with the exiled Stuarts, particularly in Italy by James Stuart, “the Old Pretender,” and his two sons, Charles and Henry (Cardinal York).

KINGSFORD, WILLIAM (1819-1898), British engineer and Canadian historian, was born in London on the 23rd of December 1819. He first studied architecture, but disliking the confinement of an office enlisted in the 1st Dragoon Guards, obtaining his discharge in Canada in 1841. After serving for a time in the office of the city surveyor of Montreal he made a survey for the Lachine canal (1846-1848), and was employed in the United States in the building of the Hudson River railroad in 1849, and in Panama on the railroad being constructed there in 1851. In 1853 he was surveyor and, afterwards district superintendent for the Grand Trunk railroad, remaining in the employment of that company until 1864. The following year he went to England but returned to Canada in 1867 in the hope of taking part in the construction of the Intercolonial Railway. In this he was unsuccessful, but from 1872 to 1879 he held a government post in charge of the harbours of the Great Lakes and the St Lawrence. He had previously written books on engineering and topographical subjects, and in 1880 he began to study the records of Canadian history at Ottawa. Among other books he published Canadian Archaeology (1886) and Early Bibliography of Ontario (1892). But the great work of his life was a History of Canada in 10 volumes (1887-1897), ending with the union of Upper and Lower Canada in 1841. Kingsford died on the 28th of September 1898.
KINGSFORD, WILLIAM (1819-1898), British engineer and Canadian historian, was born in London on December 23, 1819. He initially studied architecture but found the office environment confining, so he enlisted in the 1st Dragoon Guards, where he was discharged in Canada in 1841. After working briefly in the office of the city surveyor of Montreal, he conducted a survey for the Lachine Canal (1846-1848) and was employed in the United States on the Hudson River railroad in 1849, as well as in Panama on the railroad being built there in 1851. In 1853, he served as a surveyor and later as district superintendent for the Grand Trunk railroad, staying with that company until 1864. The following year, he went to England but returned to Canada in 1867, hoping to participate in the construction of the Intercolonial Railway. His efforts in this regard were unsuccessful, but from 1872 to 1879, he held a government position overseeing the harbors of the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence. He had previously authored books on engineering and topographical topics, and in 1880, he started researching Canadian history records in Ottawa. Among other publications, he released Canadian Archaeology (1886) and Early Bibliography of Ontario (1892). However, the most significant work of his life was a History of Canada in 10 volumes (1887-1897), which concluded with the union of Upper and Lower Canada in 1841. Kingsford passed away on September 28, 1898.

KINGSLEY, CHARLES (1819-1875), English clergyman, poet and novelist, was born on the 12th of June 1819, at Holne vicarage, Dartmoor, Devon. His early years were spent at Barnack in the Fen country and at Clovelly in North Devon. The scenery of both made a great impression on his mind, and was afterwards described with singular vividness in his writings. He was educated at private schools and at King’s College, London, after his father’s promotion to the rectory of St Luke’s, Chelsea. In 1838 he entered Magdalene College, Cambridge, and in 1842 he was ordained to the curacy of Eversley in Hampshire, to the rectory of which he was not long afterwards presented, and this, with short intervals, was his home for the remaining thirty-three years of his life. In 1844 he married Fanny, daughter of Pascoe Grenfell, and in 1848 he published his first volume, The Saint’s Tragedy. In 1859 he became chaplain to Queen Victoria; in 1860 he was appointed to the professorship of modern history at Cambridge, which he resigned in 1869; and soon after he was appointed to a canonry at Chester. In 1873 this was exchanged for a canonry at Westminster. He died at Eversley on the 23rd of January 1875.
KINGSLEY, CHARLES (1819-1875), English clergyman, poet, and novelist, was born on June 12, 1819, at Holne vicarage, Dartmoor, Devon. He spent his early years in Barnack in the Fens and in Clovelly in North Devon. The landscapes of both places had a significant impact on him and were later portrayed with remarkable clarity in his works. He was educated at private schools and at King’s College, London, after his father became the rector of St Luke’s, Chelsea. In 1838 he enrolled at Magdalene College, Cambridge, and in 1842, he was ordained as the curate of Eversley in Hampshire, where he was soon appointed to the rectory, which became his home for the next thirty-three years, with only short intervals. In 1844, he married Fanny, daughter of Pascoe Grenfell, and in 1848, he published his first book, The Saint’s Tragedy. In 1859, he became chaplain to Queen Victoria; in 1860, he was made professor of modern history at Cambridge, a position he resigned in 1869; shortly after, he was appointed to a canonry at Chester. In 1873, he exchanged that for a canonry at Westminster. He passed away at Eversley on January 23, 1875.
With the exception of occasional changes of residence in England, generally for the sake of his wife’s health, one or two short holiday trips abroad, a tour in the West Indies, and another in America to visit his eldest son settled there as an engineer, his life was spent in the peaceful, if active, occupations of a clergyman who did his duty earnestly, and of a vigorous and prolific writer. But in spite of this apparently uneventful life, he was for many years one of the most prominent men of his time, and by his personality and his books he exercised considerable influence on the thought of his generation. Though not profoundly learned, he was a man of wide and various information, whose interests and sympathies embraced many branches of human knowledge. He was an enthusiastic student in particular of natural history and geology. Sprung on the father’s side from an old English race of country squires, and on his mother’s side from a good West Indian family who had been slaveholders for generations, he had a keen love of sport and a genuine sympathy with country-folk, but he had at the same time something of the scorn for lower races to be found in the members of a dominant race.
Aside from some occasional moves within England, mainly for his wife's health, a couple of short trips abroad, a tour in the West Indies, and another trip to America to visit his eldest son who had settled there as an engineer, he lived a life dedicated to the peaceful but active responsibilities of a clergyman who took his duties seriously, as well as being a vigorous and prolific writer. Despite this seemingly uneventful existence, he was one of the most notable figures of his time, and his personality and writings had a significant impact on the thoughts of his generation. While he wasn't deeply scholarly, he possessed a broad range of knowledge, with interests that spanned many areas of human understanding. He was particularly passionate about studying natural history and geology. On his father's side, he descended from an old English line of country squires, and on his mother's side, he hailed from a respectable West Indian family that had been slaveholders for generations. He had a strong love for sports and a genuine empathy for rural people, but he also carried a certain disdain for lower races typical of those from a dominant society.
With the sympathetic organization which made him keenly sensible of the wants of the poor, he threw himself heartily into the movement known as Christian Socialism, of which Frederick Denison Maurice was the recognized leader, and for many years he was considered as an extreme radical in a profession the traditions of which were conservative. While in this phase he wrote his novels Yeast and Alton Locke, in which, though he pointed out unsparingly the folly of extremes, he certainly sympathized not only with the poor, but with much that was done and said by the leaders in the Chartist movement. Yet even then he considered that the true leaders of the people were a peer and a dean, and there was no real inconsistency in the fact that at a later period he was among the most strenuous defenders of Governor Eyre in the measures adopted by him to put down the Jamaican disturbances. He looked rather to the extension of the co-operative principle and to sanitary reform for the amelioration of the condition of the people than to any radical political change. His politics might therefore have been described as Toryism tempered by sympathy, or as Radicalism tempered by hereditary scorn of subject races. He was bitterly opposed to what he considered to be the medievalism and narrowness of the Oxford Tractarian Movement. In Macmillan’s Magazine for January 1864 he asserted that truth for its own sake was not obligatory with the Roman Catholic clergy, quoting as his authority John Henry Newman (q.v.). In the ensuing controversy Kingsley was completely discomfited. He was a broad churchman, who held what would be called a liberal theology, but the Church, its organization, its creed, its dogma, had ever an increasing hold upon him. Although at one 818 period he certainly shrank from reciting the Athanasian Creed in church, he was towards the close of his life found ready to join an association for the defence of this formulary. The more orthodox and conservative elements in his character gained the upper hand as time went on, but careful students of him and his writings will find a deep conservatism underlying the most radical utterances of his earlier years, while a passionate sympathy for the poor, the afflicted and the weak held possession of him till the last hour of his life.
With the compassionate organization that made him acutely aware of the needs of the poor, he fully engaged in the movement known as Christian Socialism, led by Frederick Denison Maurice. For many years, he was seen as an extreme radical in a profession that was typically conservative. During this time, he wrote his novels Yeast and Alton Locke, in which he pointed out the foolishness of extremes but also showed sympathy not only for the poor but also for much of what was said and done by the leaders of the Chartist movement. Even then, he believed that the true leaders of the people were a peer and a dean, and there was no real contradiction in the fact that later on, he became one of the strongest defenders of Governor Eyre regarding the actions taken to quell the disturbances in Jamaica. He leaned more toward the expansion of the cooperative principle and sanitary reform to improve the people's conditions rather than radical political changes. His politics could thus be described as Toryism softened by compassion, or Radicalism softened by an inherited disdain for subject races. He was strongly opposed to what he saw as the medievalism and narrowness of the Oxford Tractarian Movement. In the January 1864 issue of Macmillan’s Magazine, he claimed that truth for its own sake was not a requirement for the Roman Catholic clergy, citing John Henry Newman (q.v.) as his source. In the resulting controversy, Kingsley was thoroughly outmatched. He was a broad churchman with what could be considered a liberal theology, but the Church, its organization, its creed, and its dogma increasingly influenced him. While there was a time when he hesitated to recite the Athanasian Creed in church, by the end of his life, he was willing to join a group defending this statement of faith. The more orthodox and conservative parts of his character became more prominent over time, but careful observers of him and his writings will notice a deep conservatism underlying his most radical statements from his earlier years, while a strong compassion for the poor, the afflicted, and the weak remained with him until his last moments.
Both as a writer and in his personal intercourse with men, Kingsley was a thoroughly stimulating teacher. As with his own teacher, Maurice, his influence on other men rather consisted in inducing them to think for themselves than in leading them to adopt his own views, never, perhaps, very definite. But his healthy and stimulating influence was largely due to the fact that he interpreted the thoughts which were stirring in the minds of many of his contemporaries.
Both as a writer and in his personal interactions with people, Kingsley was an incredibly inspiring teacher. Like his own mentor, Maurice, his impact on others mainly came from encouraging them to think for themselves rather than pushing them to accept his own opinions, which were never very fixed. However, his positive and energizing influence largely stemmed from his ability to articulate the ideas that were resonating in the minds of many of his peers.
As a preacher he was vivid, eager and earnest, equally plain-spoken and uncompromising when preaching to a fashionable congregation or to his own village poor. One of the very best of his writings is a sermon called The Message of the Church to Working Men; and the best of his published discourses are the Twenty-five Village Sermons which he preached in the early years of his Eversley life.
As a preacher, he was vibrant, enthusiastic, and sincere, blunt and straightforward whether speaking to an upscale audience or to the less fortunate in his village. One of his greatest works is a sermon titled The Message of the Church to Working Men; and the finest of his published sermons are the Twenty-five Village Sermons that he delivered in the early years of his time in Eversley.
As a novelist his chief power lay in his descriptive faculties. The descriptions of South American scenery in Westward Ho!, of the Egyptian desert in Hypatia, of the North Devon scenery in Two Years Ago, are among the most brilliant pieces of word-painting in English prose-writing; and the American scenery is even more vividly and more truthfully described when he had seen it only by the eye of his imagination than in his work At Last, which was written after he had visited the tropics. His sympathy for children taught him how to secure their interests. His version of the old Greek stories entitled The Heroes, and Water-babies and Madam How and Lady Why, in which he deals with popular natural history, take high rank among books for children.
As a novelist, his main strength was his ability to describe. The portrayals of South American landscapes in Westward Ho!, the Egyptian desert in Hypatia, and the North Devon scenery in Two Years Ago are some of the most exceptional examples of descriptive writing in English prose. Even the American scenery is depicted more vividly and accurately when he only imagined it than in his later work At Last, which he wrote after actually visiting the tropics. His understanding of children allowed him to advocate for their interests. His retelling of ancient Greek tales called The Heroes, along with Water-babies and Madam How and Lady Why, which cover popular natural history, are highly regarded among children's literature.
As a poet he wrote but little, but there are passages in The Saint’s Tragedy and many isolated lyrics, which are worthy of a place in all standard collections of English literature. Andromeda is a very successful attempt at naturalizing the hexameter as a form of English verse, and reproduces with great skill the sonorous roll of the Greek original.
As a poet, he wrote only a little, but there are sections in The Saint’s Tragedy and several standalone lyrics that deserve a spot in all standard collections of English literature. Andromeda is a highly successful effort to adapt the hexameter as a form of English verse, and it skillfully captures the melodic flow of the Greek original.
In person Charles Kingsley was tall and spare, sinewy rather than powerful, and of a restless excitable temperament. His complexion was swarthy, his hair dark, and his eye bright and piercing. His temper was hot, kept under rigid control; his disposition tender, gentle and loving, with flashing scorn and indignation against all that was ignoble and impure; he was a good husband, father and friend. One of his daughters, Mary St Leger Kingsley (Mrs Harrison), has become well known as a novelist under the pseudonym of “Lucas Malet.”
In person, Charles Kingsley was tall and lean, more sinewy than muscular, with a restless and excitable temperament. He had a swarthy complexion, dark hair, and bright, piercing eyes. He had a fiery temper that he kept under strict control; his nature was tender, gentle, and loving, with sudden flashes of scorn and indignation toward everything that was low and impure. He was a good husband, father, and friend. One of his daughters, Mary St Leger Kingsley (Mrs. Harrison), is well-known as a novelist under the pen name "Lucas Malet."
Kingsley’s life was written by his widow in 1877, entitled Charles Kingsley, his Letters and Memories of his Life, and presents a very touching and beautiful picture of her husband, but perhaps hardly does justice to his humour, his wit, his overflowing vitality and boyish fun.
Kingsley's life was written by his widow in 1877, titled Charles Kingsley, his Letters and Memories of his Life, and offers a touching and beautiful portrayal of her husband, but it may not fully capture his humor, wit, lively spirit, and youthful fun.
The following is a list of Kingsley’s writings:—Saint’s Tragedy, a drama (1848); Alton Locke, a novel (1849); Yeast, a novel (1849); Twenty-five Village Sermons (1849); Phaeton, or Loose Thoughts for Loose Thinkers (1852); Sermons on National Subjects (1st series, 1852); Hypatia, a novel (1853); Glaucus, or the Wonders of the Shore (1855); Sermons on National Subjects (2nd series, 1854); Alexandria and her Schools (1854); Westward Ho! a novel (1855); Sermons for the Times (1855); The Heroes, Greek fairy tales (1856); Two Years Ago, a novel (1857); Andromeda and other Poems (1858); The Good News of God, sermons (1859); Miscellanies (1859); Limits of Exact Science applied to History (Inaugural Lectures, 1860); Town and Country Sermons (1861); Sermons on the Pentateuch (1863); Water-babies (1863); The Roman and the Teuton (1864); David and other Sermons (1866); Hereward the Wake, a novel (1866); The Ancient Regime (Lectures at the Royal Institution, 1867); Water of Life and other Sermons (1867); The Hermits (1869); Madam How and Lady Why (1869); At last (1871); Town Geology (1872); Discipline and other Sermons (1872); Prose Idylls (1873); Plays and Puritans (1873); Health and Education (1874); Westminster Sermons (1874); Lectures delivered in America (1875). He was a large contributor to periodical literature; many of his essays are included in Prose Idylls and other works in the above list. But no collection has been made of some of his more characteristic writings in the Christian Socialist and Politics for the People, many of them signed by the pseudonym he then assumed, “Parson Lot.”
The following is a list of Kingsley’s writings:—Saint’s Tragedy, a play (1848); Alton Locke, a novel (1849); Yeast, a novel (1849); Twenty-five Village Sermons (1849); Phaeton, or Loose Thoughts for Loose Thinkers (1852); Sermons on National Subjects (1st series, 1852); Hypatia, a novel (1853); Glaucus, or the Wonders of the Shore (1855); Sermons on National Subjects (2nd series, 1854); Alexandria and her Schools (1854); Westward Ho!, a novel (1855); Sermons for the Times (1855); The Heroes, Greek fairy tales (1856); Two Years Ago, a novel (1857); Andromeda and other Poems (1858); The Good News of God, sermons (1859); Miscellanies (1859); Limits of Exact Science applied to History (Inaugural Lectures, 1860); Town and Country Sermons (1861); Sermons on the Pentateuch (1863); Water-babies (1863); The Roman and the Teuton (1864); David and other Sermons (1866); Hereward the Wake, a novel (1866); The Ancient Regime (Lectures at the Royal Institution, 1867); Water of Life and other Sermons (1867); The Hermits (1869); Madam How and Lady Why (1869); At Last (1871); Town Geology (1872); Discipline and other Sermons (1872); Prose Idylls (1873); Plays and Puritans (1873); Health and Education (1874); Westminster Sermons (1874); Lectures delivered in America (1875). He contributed extensively to periodical literature; many of his essays are included in Prose Idylls and other works in the list above. However, no collection has been made of some of his more distinctive writings in the Christian Socialist and Politics for the People, many of which were signed with the pseudonym he used at the time, “Parson Lot.”

KINGSLEY, HENRY (1830-1876), English novelist, younger brother of Charles Kingsley, was born at Barnack, Northamptonshire, on the 2nd of January 1830. In 1853 he left Oxford, where he was an undergraduate at Worcester College, for the Australian goldfields. This venture, however, was not a success, and after five years he returned to England. He achieved considerable popularity with his Recollections of Geoffrey Hamlyn (1859), a novel of Australian life. This was the first of a series of novels of which Ravenshoe (1861) and The Hillyars and The Burtons (1865) are the best known. These stories are characterized by much vigour, abundance of incident, and healthy sentiment. He edited for eighteen months the Edinburgh Daily Review, for which he had acted as war correspondent during the Franco-German War. He died at Cuckfield, Sussex, on the 24th of May 1876.
KINGSLEY, HENRY (1830-1876), English novelist and younger brother of Charles Kingsley, was born in Barnack, Northamptonshire, on January 2, 1830. In 1853, he left Oxford, where he was studying at Worcester College, to head to the Australian goldfields. However, this venture didn't pan out, and after five years, he returned to England. He gained significant popularity with his novel Recollections of Geoffrey Hamlyn (1859), which explores Australian life. This was the first in a series of novels, with Ravenshoe (1861) and The Hillyars and The Burtons (1865) being the most well-known. These stories are marked by a lot of energy, plenty of action, and a healthy sentiment. He edited the Edinburgh Daily Review for eighteen months, where he also served as a war correspondent during the Franco-German War. He passed away in Cuckfield, Sussex, on May 24, 1876.

KINGSLEY, MARY HENRIETTA (1862-1900), English traveller, ethnologist and author, daughter of George Henry Kingsley (1827-1892), was born in Islington, London, on the 13th of October 1862. Her father, though less widely known than his brothers, Charles and Henry (see above), was a man of versatile abilities, with a passion for travelling which he managed to indulge in combination with his practice as a doctor. He wrote one popular book of travel, South Sea Bubbles, by the Earl and the Doctor (1872), in collaboration with the 13th earl of Pembroke. Mary Kingsley’s reading in history, poetry and philosophy was wide if desultory, but she was most attracted to natural history. Her family moved to Cambridge in 1886, where she studied the science of sociology. The loss of both parents in 1892 left her free to pursue her own course, and she resolved to study native religion and law in West Africa with a view to completing a book which her father had left unfinished. With her study of “raw fetish” she combined that of a scientific collector of fresh-water fishes. She started for the West Coast in August 1893; and at Kabinda, at Old Calabar, Fernando Po and on the Lower Congo she pursued her investigations, returning to England in June 1894. She gained sufficient knowledge of the native customs to contribute an introduction to Mr R. E. Dennett’s Notes on the Folk Lore of the Fjort (1898). Miss Kingsley made careful preparations for a second visit to the same coast; and in December 1894, provided by the British Museum authorities with a collector’s equipment, she proceeded via Old Calabar to French Congo, and ascended the Ogowé River. From this point her journey, in part across country hitherto untrodden by Europeans, was a long series of adventures and hairbreadth escapes, at one time from the dangers of land and water, at another from the cannibal Fang. Returning to the coast Miss Kingsley went to Corisco and to the German colony of Cameroon, where she made the ascent of the Great Cameroon (13,760 ft.) from a direction until then unattempted. She returned to England in October 1895. The story of her adventures and her investigations in fetish is vividly told in her Travels in West Africa (1897). The book aroused wide interest, and she lectured to scientific gatherings on the fauna, flora and folk-lore of West Africa, and to commercial audiences on the trade of that region and its possible developments, always with a protest against the lack of detailed knowledge characteristic of modern dealings with new fields of trade. In both cases she spoke with authority, for she had brought back a considerable number of new specimens of fishes and plants, and had herself traded in rubber and oil in the districts through which she passed. But her chief concern was for the development of the negro on African, not European, lines and for the government of the British possessions on the West Coast by methods which left the native “a free unsmashed man—not a whitewashed slave or an enemy.” With undaunted energy Miss Kingsley made preparations for a third journey to the West Coast, but the Anglo-Boer War changed her plans, and she 819 decided to go first to South Africa to nurse fever cases. She died of enteric fever at Simon’s Town, where she was engaged in tending Boer prisoners, on the 3rd of June 1900. Miss Kingsley’s works, besides her Travels, include West African Studies, The Story of West Africa, a memoir of her father prefixed to his Notes on Sport and Travel (1899), and many contributions to the study of West African law and folk-lore. To continue the investigation of the subjects Miss Kingsley had made her own “The African Society” was founded in 1901.
KINGSLEY, MARY HENRIETTA (1862-1900), English traveler, ethnologist, and author, was born in Islington, London, on October 13, 1862. She was the daughter of George Henry Kingsley (1827-1892). Although her father wasn't as famous as his brothers, Charles and Henry (see above), he was a talented man with a love for travel that he managed to balance with his work as a doctor. He co-authored a well-known travel book, South Sea Bubbles, by the Earl and the Doctor (1872), with the 13th Earl of Pembroke. Mary Kingsley had a broad but somewhat scattered interest in history, poetry, and philosophy, though her greatest passion was natural history. Her family relocated to Cambridge in 1886, where she studied sociology. After losing both of her parents in 1892, she was free to follow her own path, and she decided to study native religion and law in West Africa to finish a book her father had left incomplete. Along with studying “raw fetish,” she also gathered specimens as a scientific collector of fresh-water fish. She departed for the West Coast in August 1893; in Kabinda, Old Calabar, Fernando Po, and along the Lower Congo, she conducted her research, returning to England in June 1894. She acquired enough knowledge of local customs to write an introduction for Mr. R. E. Dennett’s Notes on the Folk Lore of the Fjort (1898). Miss Kingsley made thorough preparations for a second trip to the same region, and in December 1894, equipped by the British Museum with collector's gear, she traveled via Old Calabar to French Congo and ascended the Ogowé River. This part of her journey, traversing areas previously unexplored by Europeans, was filled with adventures and narrow escapes, sometimes from natural dangers and other times from the cannibal Fang. After returning to the coast, Miss Kingsley went to Corisco and then to the German colony of Cameroon, where she climbed the Great Cameroon (13,760 ft.) from a previously unattempted route. She returned to England in October 1895. The tale of her adventures and her research into fetish is vividly recounted in her book Travels in West Africa (1897). The book generated significant interest, and she lectured to scientific audiences on the fauna, flora, and folklore of West Africa, as well as to commercial groups about trade in the region and its potential growth, often criticizing the lack of detailed understanding prevalent in modern approaches to new trade opportunities. She spoke with authority, having brought back numerous new fish and plant specimens and traded in rubber and oil in the regions she explored. However, her main focus was on advancing the rights of Africans according to African, not European, standards and advocating for the governance of British territories on the West Coast in a manner that allowed the native population “to be free and unsmashed—not a whitewashed slave or an enemy.” With relentless determination, Miss Kingsley prepared for a third journey to the West Coast, but the Anglo-Boer War altered her plans, prompting her to go to South Africa first to care for fever patients. She died of enteric fever in Simon’s Town on June 3, 1900, while tending to Boer prisoners. Besides her Travels, Miss Kingsley’s works include West African Studies, The Story of West Africa, a memoir of her father prefixed to his Notes on Sport and Travel (1899), and numerous contributions to the study of West African law and folklore. To continue the research on topics that Miss Kingsley had dedicated herself to, “The African Society” was founded in 1901.
Valuable biographical information from the pen of Mr George A. Macmillan is prefixed to a second edition (1901) of the Studies.
Valuable biographical information from Mr. George A. Macmillan is included in the second edition (1901) of the Studies.

KING’S LYNN (Lynn or Lynn Regis), a market town, seaport and municipal and parliamentary borough of Norfolk, England, on the estuary of the Great Ouse near its outflow into the Wash. Pop. (1901), 20,288. It is 97 m. N. by E. from London by the Great Eastern railway, and is also served by the Midland and Great Northern joint line. On the land side the town was formerly defended by a fosse, and there are still considerable remains of the old wall, including the handsome South Gate of the 15th century. Several by-channels of the river, passing through the town, are known as fleets, recalling the similar flethe of Hamburg. The Public Walks forms a pleasant promenade parallel to the wall, and in the centre of it stands a picturesque octagonal Chapel of the Red Mount, exhibiting ornate Perpendicular work, and once frequented by pilgrims. The church of St Margaret, formerly the priory church, is a fine building with two towers at the west end, one of which was formerly surmounted by a spire, blown down in 1741. Norman or transitional work appears in the base of both towers, of which the southern also shows Early English and Decorated work, while the northern is chiefly Perpendicular. There is a fine Perpendicular east window of circular form. The church possesses two of the finest monumental brasses in existence, dated respectively 1349 and 1364. St Nicholas chapel, at the north end of the town, is also of rich Perpendicular workmanship, with a tower of earlier date. All Saints’ church in South Lynn is a beautiful Decorated cruciform structure. Of a Franciscan friary there remains the Perpendicular Grey Friars’ Steeple, and the doorway remains of a priests’ college founded in 1502. At the grammar school, founded in the reign of Henry VIII., but occupying modern buildings, Eugene Aram was usher. Among the other public buildings are the guildhall, with Renaissance front, the corn exchange, the picturesque custom-house of the 17th century, the athenaeum (including a museum, hall and other departments), the Stanley Library and the municipal buildings. The fisheries of the town are important, including extensive mussel-fisheries under the jurisdiction of the corporation, and there are also breweries, corn-mills, iron and brass foundries, agricultural implement manufactories, ship-building yards, rope and sail works. Lynn Harbour has an area of 30 acres and an average depth at low tide of 10 ft. There is also good anchorage in the roads leading from the Wash to the docks. There are two docks of 6¾ and 10 acres area respectively. A considerable traffic is carried on by barges on the Ouse. The municipal and parliamentary boroughs of Lynn are co-extensive; the parliamentary borough returns one member. The town is governed by a mayor, 6 aldermen and 18 councillors. Area, 3061 acres.
KING'S LYNN (Lynn or Lynn Regis), is a market town, seaport, and municipal and parliamentary borough in Norfolk, England, located on the estuary of the Great Ouse near where it flows into the Wash. Population (1901): 20,288. It is 97 miles northeast of London by the Great Eastern railway and is also accessible via the Midland and Great Northern joint line. The town was once protected by a moat on the land side, and there are still significant remnants of the old wall, including the beautiful South Gate from the 15th century. Several channels of the river that flow through the town are known as fleets, reminiscent of Hamburg's flethe. The Public Walks provide a pleasant promenade alongside the wall, and in the center stands a picturesque octagonal Chapel of the Red Mount, featuring ornate Perpendicular architecture and once visited by pilgrims. St. Margaret's church, which used to be the priory church, is an impressive building with two towers at the west end, one of which had a spire that was blown down in 1741. The bases of both towers show Norman or transitional work; the southern tower also displays Early English and Decorated styles, while the northern is mostly Perpendicular. There’s a striking Perpendicular east window in a circular shape. The church has two of the finest monumental brasses still in existence, dated 1349 and 1364. St. Nicholas chapel, at the north end of the town, also showcases rich Perpendicular craftsmanship, with a tower of an earlier date. All Saints' church in South Lynn is a lovely Decorated cruciform structure. The Perpendicular Grey Friars’ Steeple remains from a Franciscan friary, and remnants of a priests’ college established in 1502 can still be found. At the grammar school, established during the reign of Henry VIII but now in modern buildings, Eugene Aram served as usher. Other public buildings include the guildhall with its Renaissance front, the corn exchange, the charming 17th-century custom-house, the athenaeum (which comprises a museum, hall, and other facilities), the Stanley Library, and the municipal buildings. The town's fisheries are significant, including large mussel fisheries managed by the corporation. Additionally, there are breweries, corn mills, iron and brass foundries, agricultural implement manufacturers, shipyards, and rope and sail works. Lynn Harbour covers 30 acres and has an average depth of 10 feet at low tide. There is also good anchorage in the routes from the Wash to the docks. The town has two docks, measuring 6¾ and 10 acres, respectively. Considerable traffic is conducted by barges on the Ouse. The municipal and parliamentary boroughs of Lynn are the same; the parliamentary borough elects one representative. The town is governed by a mayor, 6 aldermen, and 18 councillors. Area: 3,061 acres.
As Lynn (Lun, Lenne, Bishop’s Lynn) owes its origin to the trade which its early settlers carried by the Ouse and its tributaries its history dates from the period of settled occupation by the Saxons. It belonged to the bishops of Thetford before the Conquest and remained with the see when it was translated to Norwich. Herbert de Losinga (c. 1054-1119) granted its jurisdiction to the cathedral of Norwich but this right was resumed by a later bishop, John de Gray, who in 1204 had obtained from John a charter establishing Lynn as a free borough. A fuller grant in 1206 gave the burgesses a gild merchant, the husting court to be held once a week only, and general liberties according to the customs of Oxford, saving the rights of the bishop and the earl of Arundel, whose ancestor William D’Albini had received from William II. the moiety of the tolbooth. Among numerous later charters one of 1268 confirmed the privilege granted to the burgesses by the bishop of choosing a mayor; another of 1416 re-established his election by the aldermen alone. Henry VIII. granted Lynn two charters, the first (1524) incorporating it under mayor and aldermen; the second (1537) changing its name to King’s Lynn and transferring to the corporation all the rights hitherto enjoyed by the bishop. Edward VI. added the possessions of the gild of the Trinity, or gild merchant, and St George’s gild, while Queen Mary annexed South Lynn. Admiralty rights were granted by James I. Lynn, which had declared for the Crown in 1643, surrendered its privileges to Charles II. in 1684, but recovered its charter on the eve of the Revolution. A fair held on the festival of St Margaret (July 20) was included in the grant to the monks of Norwich about 1100. Three charters of John granting the bishop fairs on the feasts of St Nicholas, St Ursula and St Margaret are extant, and another of Edward I., changing the last to the feast of St Peter ad Vincula (Aug. 1). A local act was passed in 1558-1559 for keeping a mart or fair once a year. In the eighteenth century besides the pleasure fair, still held in February, there was another in October, now abolished. A royal charter of 1524 established the cattle, corn and general provisions market, still held every Tuesday and Saturday. Lynn has ranked high among English seaports from early times.
As Lynn (Lun, Lenne, Bishop’s Lynn) started from the trade that its early settlers conducted along the Ouse and its tributaries, its history began during the period when the Saxons settled in the area. It was under the bishops of Thetford before the Conquest and stayed with the see when it moved to Norwich. Herbert de Losinga (c. 1054-1119) granted its jurisdiction to the cathedral of Norwich, but this right was taken back by a later bishop, John de Gray, who in 1204 obtained a charter from John establishing Lynn as a free borough. A more detailed grant in 1206 provided the burgesses with a merchant gild, set the husting court to meet just once a week, and granted general liberties according to the customs of Oxford, while preserving the rights of the bishop and the earl of Arundel, whose ancestor, William D’Albini, received half of the tolbooth from William II. Among many subsequent charters, one from 1268 confirmed the privilege granted to the burgesses by the bishop to elect a mayor; another from 1416 reinstated the election process to be carried out solely by the aldermen. Henry VIII granted Lynn two charters, the first (1524) incorporating it under a mayor and aldermen; the second (1537) renaming it King’s Lynn and transferring all rights previously held by the bishop to the corporation. Edward VI added the possessions of the gild of Trinity, or merchant gild, and St George’s gild, while Queen Mary included South Lynn. Admiralty rights were given by James I. Lynn, which had supported the Crown in 1643, gave up its privileges to Charles II in 1684 but regained its charter just before the Revolution. A fair held during the festival of St Margaret (July 20) was part of the grant to the monks of Norwich around 1100. Three charters from John granted the bishop fairs for the feasts of St Nicholas, St Ursula, and St Margaret, and another from Edward I changed the last to the feast of St Peter ad Vincula (Aug. 1). A local act was passed in 1558-1559 for hosting a market or fair once a year. In the eighteenth century, in addition to the pleasure fair still celebrated in February, there was another in October, which has since been discontinued. A royal charter of 1524 established the market for cattle, corn, and general provisions, still held every Tuesday and Saturday. Lynn has been recognized as a significant English seaport since early times.
See E. M. Beloe, Our Borough (1899); H. Harrod, Report on Deeds, &c.;, of King’s Lynn (1874); Victoria County History: Norfolk.
See E. M. Beloe, Our Borough (1899); H. Harrod, Report on Deeds, &c. of King’s Lynn (1874); Victoria County History: Norfolk.

KING’S MOUNTAIN, a mountainous ridge in Gaston county, North Carolina and York county, South Carolina, U.S.A. It is an outlier of the Blue Ridge running parallel with it, i.e. N.E. and S.W., but in contrast with the other mountains of the Blue Ridge, King’s Mountain has a crest marked with sharp and irregular notches. Its highest point and great escarpment are in North Carolina. About 1½ m. S. of the line between the two states, where the ridge is about 60 ft. above the surrounding country and very narrow at the top, the battle of King’s Mountain was fought on the 7th of October 1780 between a force of about 100 Provincial Rangers and about 1000 Loyalist militia under Major Patrick Ferguson (1744-1780), and an American force of about 900 backwoodsmen under Colonels William Campbell (1745-1781), Benjamin Cleveland (1738-1806), Isaac Shelby, John Sevier and James Williams (1740-1780), in which the Americans were victorious. The British loss is stated as 119 killed (including the commander), 123 wounded, and 664 prisoners; the American loss was 28 killed (including Colonel Williams) and 62 wounded. The victory largely contributed to the success of General Nathanael Greene’s campaign against Lord Cornwallis. There has been some dispute as to the exact site of the engagement, but the weight of evidence is in favour of the position mentioned above, on the South Carolina side of the line. A monument erected in 1815 was replaced in 1880 by a much larger one, and a monument for which Congress appropriated $30,000 in 1906, was completed in 1909.
KING'S MOUNTAIN, is a mountain ridge located in Gaston County, North Carolina, and York County, South Carolina, U.S.A. It is a smaller range associated with the Blue Ridge, running parallel to it, i.e., N.E. and S.W. However, unlike the other mountains in the Blue Ridge, King’s Mountain has a crest with sharp and irregular notches. Its highest point and steep cliffs are in North Carolina. About 1½ miles south of the state line, where the ridge rises about 60 feet above the surrounding area and is very narrow at the top, the battle of King’s Mountain took place on October 7, 1780. The battle was fought between a force of about 100 Provincial Rangers and roughly 1,000 Loyalist militia led by Major Patrick Ferguson (1744-1780), and an American force of about 900 frontiersmen led by Colonels William Campbell (1745-1781), Benjamin Cleveland (1738-1806), Isaac Shelby, John Sevier, and James Williams (1740-1780), resulting in an American victory. The British suffered 119 killed (including their commander), 123 wounded, and 664 captured; the Americans lost 28 killed (including Colonel Williams) and 62 wounded. This victory greatly contributed to General Nathanael Greene’s campaign against Lord Cornwallis. There has been some debate over the exact location of the battle, but most evidence supports the location mentioned above, on the South Carolina side of the line. A monument was erected in 1815 and replaced in 1880 with a much larger structure, and another monument funded by Congress at a cost of $30,000 in 1906 was completed in 1909.
See L. C. Draper, King’s Mountain and its Heroes (Cincinnati, 1881); and Edward McCrady, South Carolina in the Revolution 1775-1780 (New York, 1901).
See L. C. Draper, King’s Mountain and its Heroes (Cincinnati, 1881); and Edward McCrady, South Carolina in the Revolution 1775-1780 (New York, 1901).

KINGSTON, ELIZABETH, Duchess of (1720-1788), sometimes called countess of Bristol, was the daughter of Colonel Thomas Chudleigh (d. 1726), and was appointed maid of honour to Augusta, princess of Wales, in 1743, probably through the good offices of her friend, William Pulteney, earl of Bath. Being a very beautiful woman Miss Chudleigh did not lack admirers, among whom were James, 6th duke of Hamilton, and Augustus John Hervey, afterwards 3rd earl of Bristol. Hamilton, however, left England, and on the 4th of August 1744 she was privately married to Hervey at Lainston, near Winchester. Both husband and wife being poor, their union was kept secret to enable Elizabeth to retain her post at court, while Hervey, who was a naval officer, rejoined his ship, returning to England towards the close of 1746. The marriage was a very unhappy one, and the pair soon ceased to live together; but when it appeared probable that Hervey would succeed his brother as earl 820 of Bristol, his wife took steps to obtain proof of her marriage. This did not, however, prevent her from becoming the mistress of Evelyn Pierrepont, 2nd duke of Kingston, and she was not only a very prominent figure in London society, but in 1765 in Berlin she was honoured by the attentions of Frederick the Great. By this time Hervey wished for a divorce from his wife; but Elizabeth, although equally anxious to be free, was unwilling to face the publicity attendant upon this step. However she began a suit of jactitation against Hervey. This case was doubtless collusive, and after Elizabeth had sworn she was unmarried, the court in February 1769 pronounced her a spinster. Within a month she married Kingston, who died four years later, leaving her all his property on condition that she remained a widow. Visiting Rome the duchess was received with honour by Clement XIV.; after which she hurried back to England to defend herself from a charge of bigamy, which had been preferred against her by Kingston’s nephew, Evelyn Meadows (d. 1826). The house of Lords in 1776 found her guilty, and retaining her fortune she hurriedly left England to avoid further proceedings on the part of the Meadows family, who had a reversionary interest in the Kingston estates. She lived for a time in Calais, and then repaired to St Petersburg, near which city she bought an estate which she named “Chudleigh.” Afterwards she resided in Paris, Rome, and elsewhere, and died in Paris on the 26th of August 1788. The duchess was a coarse and licentious woman, and was ridiculed as Kitty Crocodile by the comedian Samuel Foote in a play A Trip to Calais, which, however, he was not allowed to produce. She is said to have been the original of Thackeray’s characters, Beatrice and Baroness Bernstein.
KINGSTON, ELIZABETH, Duchess of (1720-1788), sometimes called the Countess of Bristol, was the daughter of Colonel Thomas Chudleigh (d. 1726) and was appointed maid of honor to Augusta, Princess of Wales, in 1743, likely through the help of her friend, William Pulteney, Earl of Bath. Being an exceptionally beautiful woman, Miss Chudleigh had no shortage of admirers, including James, 6th Duke of Hamilton, and Augustus John Hervey, who later became the 3rd Earl of Bristol. However, Hamilton left England, and on August 4, 1744, she was privately married to Hervey at Lainston, near Winchester. Both were poor, so they kept their marriage a secret to allow Elizabeth to keep her court position, while Hervey, a naval officer, rejoined his ship, returning to England towards the end of 1746. The marriage was very unhappy, and the couple soon stopped living together; but when it looked likely that Hervey would succeed his brother as earl of Bristol, his wife sought proof of their marriage. This did not stop her from becoming the mistress of Evelyn Pierrepont, 2nd Duke of Kingston, and she became a prominent figure in London society, even attracting the attention of Frederick the Great in Berlin in 1765. By this point, Hervey wanted a divorce from Elizabeth; she was also eager to be free but reluctant to face the public scrutiny that would come with it. Nevertheless, she initiated a case of jactitation against Hervey. This case was likely collusive, and after Elizabeth swore she was unmarried, the court declared her a spinster in February 1769. Within a month, she married Kingston, who died four years later, leaving her all his property on the condition that she remained a widow. While visiting Rome, the duchess was honored by Clement XIV.; afterwards, she rushed back to England to defend herself against a bigamy charge brought by Kingston's nephew, Evelyn Meadows (d. 1826). The House of Lords found her guilty in 1776, and despite keeping her fortune, she quickly left England to avoid further actions from the Meadows family, who had a future interest in the Kingston estates. She lived in Calais for a time, then moved to St Petersburg, where she purchased an estate she named "Chudleigh." She later resided in Paris, Rome, and elsewhere, dying in Paris on August 26, 1788. The duchess was known to be a coarse and scandalous woman and was mocked as Kitty Crocodile by comedian Samuel Foote in a play A Trip to Calais, which he was ultimately not allowed to produce. She is said to have inspired Thackeray’s characters, Beatrice and Baroness Bernstein.
There is an account of the duchess in J. H. Jesse’s Memoirs of the Court of England 1688-1760, vol. iv. (1901).
There is a description of the duchess in J. H. Jesse’s Memoirs of the Court of England 1688-1760, vol. iv. (1901).

KINGSTON, WILLIAM HENRY GILES (1814-1880), English novelist, son of Lucy Henry Kingston, was born in London on the 28th of February 1814. Much of his youth was spent at Oporto, where his father was a merchant, but when he entered the business, he made his headquarters in London. He early wrote newspaper articles on Portuguese subjects. These were translated into Portuguese, and the author received a Portuguese order of knighthood and a pension for his services in the conclusion of the commercial treaty of 1842. In 1844 his first book, The Circassian Chief, appeared, and in 1845 The Prime Minister, a Story of the Days of the Great Marquis of Pombal. The Lusitanian Sketches describe Kingston’s travels in Portugal. In 1851 Peter the Whaler, his first book for boys, came out. These books proved so popular that Kingston retired from business, and devoted himself to the production of tales of adventure for boys. Within thirty years he wrote upwards of one hundred and thirty such books. He had a practical knowledge of seamanship, and his stories of the sea, full of thrilling adventures and hairbreadth escapes, exactly hit the taste of his boy readers. Characteristic specimens of his work are The Three Midshipmen; The Three Lieutenants; The Three Commanders; and The Three Admirals. He also wrote popular accounts of famous travellers by land and sea, and translated some of the stories of Jules Verne.
KINGSTON, WILLIAM HENRY GILES (1814-1880), English novelist, son of Lucy Henry Kingston, was born in London on February 28, 1814. He spent much of his youth in Oporto, where his father was a merchant, but when he entered the business, he based himself in London. Early on, he wrote newspaper articles about Portuguese topics. These were translated into Portuguese, earning him a Portuguese knighthood and a pension for his role in finalizing the commercial treaty of 1842. In 1844, his first book, The Circassian Chief, was published, followed by The Prime Minister, a Story of the Days of the Great Marquis of Pombal in 1845. The Lusitanian Sketches describe Kingston’s travels in Portugal. In 1851, he released Peter the Whaler, his first book for boys. These works became so popular that Kingston left his business to focus on writing adventure stories for boys. Over the next thirty years, he wrote more than one hundred thirty such books. He had hands-on experience with sailing, and his sea stories, filled with exciting adventures and narrow escapes, resonated with young readers. Notable examples of his work include The Three Midshipmen, The Three Lieutenants, The Three Commanders, and The Three Admirals. He also authored popular accounts of famous travelers by land and sea and translated some of Jules Verne's tales.
In all philanthropic schemes Kingston took deep interest; he was the promoter of the mission to seamen; and he acted as secretary of a society for promoting an improved system of emigration. He was editor of the Colonist for a short time in 1844 and of the Colonial Magazine and East Indian Review from 1849 to 1851. He was a supporter of the volunteer movement in England from the first. He died at Willesden on the 5th of August 1880.
In all charitable initiatives, Kingston was deeply engaged; he promoted the mission for seamen and served as the secretary for a society aimed at improving the emigration system. He was the editor of the Colonist for a brief period in 1844 and of the Colonial Magazine and East Indian Review from 1849 to 1851. He supported the volunteer movement in England from the beginning. He passed away in Willesden on August 5, 1880.

KINGSTON, the chief city of Frontenac county, Ontario, Canada, at the north-eastern extremity of Lake Ontario, and the mouth of the Cataraqui River. Pop. (1901), 17,961. It is an important station on the Grand Trunk railway, the terminus of the Kingston & Pembroke railway, and has steamboat communication with other ports on Lake Ontario and the Bay of Quinte, on the St Lawrence and the Rideau canal. It contains a fine stone graving dock, 280 ft. long, 100 ft. wide, and with a depth of 16 ft. at low water on the sill. The fortifications, which at one time made it one of the strongest fortresses in Canada, are now out of date. The sterility of the surrounding country, and the growth of railways have lessened its commercial importance, but it still contains a number of small factories, and important locomotive works and ship-building yards. As an educational and residential centre it retains high rank, and is a popular summer resort. It is the seat of an Anglican and of a Roman Catholic bishopric, of the Royal Military College (founded by the Dominion government in 1875), of an artillery school, and of Queen’s University, an institution founded in 1839 under the nominal control of the Presbyterian church, now including about 1200 students. In the suburbs are a Dominion penitentiary, and a provincial lunatic asylum. Founded by the French in 1673, under the name of Kateracoui, soon changed to Fort Frontenac, it played an important part in the wars between English and French. Taken and destroyed by the English in 1758, it was refounded in 1782 under its present name, and was from 1841 to 1844 the capital of Canada.
KINGSTON, is the main city of Frontenac County, Ontario, Canada, located at the northeastern tip of Lake Ontario, where the Cataraqui River flows into the lake. As of 1901, the population was 17,961. It serves as a key station on the Grand Trunk Railway and the endpoint of the Kingston & Pembroke Railway, with steamboat connections to other ports on Lake Ontario and the Bay of Quinte, as well as access to the St. Lawrence and Rideau Canal. The city has a large stone dry dock, measuring 280 feet long, 100 feet wide, and with a depth of 16 feet at low water on the sill. Its fortifications, which once made it one of Canada’s strongest fortresses, are now considered outdated. The barren landscape surrounding the city and the expansion of railways have reduced its commercial significance, but it still has several small factories along with important locomotive and shipbuilding facilities. As an educational and residential hub, it remains highly regarded and is a favored summer vacation spot. Kingston is home to an Anglican and a Roman Catholic bishopric, the Royal Military College (established by the Dominion government in 1875), an artillery school, and Queen’s University, which was founded in 1839 under the nominal control of the Presbyterian Church and now hosts around 1,200 students. In the suburbs, you can find a federal penitentiary and a provincial mental health facility. Established by the French in 1673 and originally named Kateracoui, later changed to Fort Frontenac, it played a significant role in the conflicts between the English and French. It was captured and destroyed by the English in 1758 and was reestablished in 1782 under its current name, serving as the capital of Canada from 1841 to 1844.

KINGSTON, a city and the county-seat of Ulster county, New York, U.S.A., on the Hudson River, at the mouth of Rondout Creek, about 90 m. N. of New York and about 53 m. S. of Albany. Pop. (1900), 24,535—3551 being foreign-born; (1910 census) 25,908. It is served by the West Shore (which here crosses Rondout Creek on a high bridge), the New York Ontario & Western, the Ulster & Delaware, and the Wallkill Valley railways, by a ferry across the river to Rhinecliff, where connexion is made with the New York Central & Hudson River railroad, and by steamboat lines to New York, Albany and other river points. The principal part of the city is built on a level plateau about 150 ft. above the river; other parts of the site vary from flatlands to rough highlands. To the N.W. is the mountain scenery of the Catskills, to the S.W. the Shawangunk Mountains and Lake Mohonk, and in the distance across the river are the Berkshire Hills. The most prominent public buildings are the post office and the city hall; in front of the latter is a Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Monument. The city has a Carnegie library. The “Senate House”—now the property of the state, with a colonial museum—was erected about 1676; it was the meeting place of the first State Senate in 1777, and was burned (except the walls) in October of that year. The court house (1818) stands on the site of the old court house, in which Governor George Clinton was inaugurated in July 1777, and in which Chief Justice John Jay held the first term of the New York Supreme Court in September 1777. The Elmendorf Tavern (1723) was the meeting-place of the New York Council of Safety in October 1777. Kingston Academy was organized in 1773, and in 1864 was transferred to the Kingston Board of Education and became part of the city’s public school system; its present building dates from 1806. Kingston’s principal manufactures are tobacco, cigars and cigarettes, street railway cars and boats; other manufactures are Rosendale cement, bricks, shirts, lace curtains, brushes, motor wheels, sash and blinds. The city ships large quantities of building and flag stones quarried in the vicinity. The total value of the factory product in 1905 was $5,000,922, an increase of 26.5% since 1900.
KINGSTON, is a city and the county seat of Ulster County, New York, U.S.A., located on the Hudson River, at the mouth of Rondout Creek, about 90 miles north of New York City and about 53 miles south of Albany. The population in 1900 was 24,535, with 3,551 being foreign-born; the 1910 census reported 25,908 residents. The city is served by the West Shore railroad (which crosses Rondout Creek on a high bridge), the New York Ontario & Western, the Ulster & Delaware, and the Wallkill Valley railways, as well as a ferry to Rhinecliff, where connections can be made with the New York Central & Hudson River railroad, and by steamboat lines to New York, Albany, and other river locations. The main part of the city is situated on a level plateau about 150 feet above the river; other areas vary from flatlands to rugged hills. To the northwest are the mountains of the Catskills, to the southwest are the Shawangunk Mountains and Lake Mohonk, and in the distance across the river are the Berkshire Hills. The most notable public buildings are the post office and the city hall, in front of which stands a Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Monument. The city has a Carnegie library. The “Senate House”—now owned by the state and home to a colonial museum—was built around 1676; it was where the first State Senate met in 1777 and was mostly destroyed by fire in October of that year. The courthouse (built in 1818) stands on the site of the old courthouse, where Governor George Clinton was inaugurated in July 1777, and where Chief Justice John Jay held the first session of the New York Supreme Court in September 1777. The Elmendorf Tavern (established in 1723) served as the meeting place for the New York Council of Safety in October 1777. Kingston Academy was founded in 1773 and was transferred to the Kingston Board of Education in 1864, becoming part of the city's public school system; its current building dates back to 1806. Kingston’s main industries include tobacco, cigars and cigarettes, streetcars, and boats; other products include Rosendale cement, bricks, shirts, lace curtains, brushes, motor wheels, and window frames and blinds. The city exports large quantities of building and flag stones quarried nearby. The total value of factory products in 1905 was $5,000,922, which marks a 26.5% increase since 1900.
In 1614 a small fort was built by the Dutch at the mouth of Rondout Creek, and in 1652 a settlement was established in the vicinity and named Esopus after the Esopus Indians, who were a subdivision of the Munsee branch of the Delawares, and whose name meant “small river,” referring possibly to Rondout Creek. The settlement was deserted in 1655-56 on account of threatened Indian attacks. In 1658 a stockade was built by the order of Governor Peter Stuyvesant, and from this event the actual founding of the city is generally dated. In 1659 the massacre of several drunken Indians by the soldiers caused a general rising of the Indians, who unsuccessfully attacked the stockade, killing some of the soldiers and inhabitants, and capturing and torturing others. Hostilities continued into the following year. In 1661 the governor named the place Wiltwyck and gave it a municipal charter. In 1663 it suffered from another Indian attack, a number of the inhabitants being slain or taken prisoners. The English took possession 821 in 1664, and in 1660 Wiltwyck was named Kingston, after Kingston Lisle, near Wantage, England, the family seat of Governor Francis Lovelace. In the same year the English garrison was removed. In 1673-1674 Kingston was again temporarily under the control of the Dutch, who called it Swanenburg. In 1777 the convention which drafted the new state constitution met in Kingston, and during part of the year Kingston was the seat of the new state government. On the 16th of October 1777 the British under General Sir John Vaughan (1748-95) sacked it and burned nearly all its buildings. In 1908 the body of George Clinton was removed from Washington, D.C., and reinterred in Kingston on the 250th anniversary of the building of the stockade. In 1787 Kingston was one of the places contemplated as a site for the national capital. In 1805 it was incorporated as a village, and in 1872 it absorbed the villages of Rondout and Wilbur and was made a city.
In 1614, the Dutch built a small fort at the mouth of Rondout Creek, and in 1652, they established a nearby settlement named Esopus, after the Esopus Indians, who were part of the Munsee group of the Delawares. Their name meant “small river,” likely referring to Rondout Creek. The settlement was abandoned in 1655-56 due to threats of Indian attacks. In 1658, Governor Peter Stuyvesant ordered the construction of a stockade, which is generally considered the founding event of the city. In 1659, soldiers massacred several drunken Indians, leading to a general uprising. The Indians unsuccessfully attacked the stockade, killing some soldiers and residents while capturing and torturing others. Conflicts continued into the next year. In 1661, the governor renamed the place Wiltwyck and granted it a municipal charter. In 1663, it faced another Indian assault, resulting in several residents being killed or taken captive. The English took control in 1664, and in 1660, Wiltwyck was renamed Kingston after Kingston Lisle, near Wantage, England, the governor's family seat, Francis Lovelace. That same year, the English garrison was withdrawn. Between 1673-1674, Kingston was briefly under Dutch control again and was called Swanenburg. In 1777, the convention that drafted the new state constitution met in Kingston, which served as the temporary seat of the new state government for part of the year. On October 16, 1777, British forces led by General Sir John Vaughan looted and nearly destroyed all the buildings. In 1908, George Clinton's remains were moved from Washington, D.C., and reburied in Kingston to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the stockade's construction. In 1787, Kingston was considered as a potential site for the national capital. It was incorporated as a village in 1805, and in 1872, it absorbed the villages of Rondout and Wilbur, becoming a city.
See M. Schoonmaker, History of Kingston (New York, 1888).
See M. Schoonmaker, History of Kingston (New York, 1888).

KINGSTON, a borough of Luzerne county, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., on the North Branch of the Susquehanna river, opposite Wilkes-Barré. Pop. (1900), 3846 (1039 foreign-born); (1910) 6449. Kingston is served by the Delaware, Lackawanna &. Western and the Lehigh Valley railways. It is the seat of Wyoming Seminary (1844; co-educational), a well-known secondary school. Anthracite coal is mined here; there are railway repair and machine-shops; and among the borough’s manufactures are hosiery, silk goods, underwear and adding machines. Kingston (at first called “Kingstown,” from Kings Towne, Rhode Island) was commonly known in its early days as the “Forty Township,” because the first permanent settlement was made by forty pioneers from Connecticut, who were sent out by the Susquehanna Company and took possession of the district in its name in 1769. In 1772 the famous “Forty Fort,” a stockade fortification, was built here, and in 1777 it was rebuilt, strengthened and enlarged. Here on the 3rd of July 1778 about 400 men and boys met, and under the command of Colonel Zebulon Butler (1731-95) went out to meet a force of about 1100 British troops and Indians, commanded by Major John Butler and Old King (Sayenqueraghte). The Americans were defeated in the engagement that followed, and many of the prisoners taken were massacred or tortured by the Indians. A monument near the site of the fort commemorates the battle and massacre. Kingston was incorporated as a borough in 1857. (See Wyoming Valley.)
KINGSTON, a borough in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., on the North Branch of the Susquehanna River, across from Wilkes-Barre. Population (1900): 3,846 (1,039 foreign-born); (1910): 6,449. Kingston is served by the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western and the Lehigh Valley railways. It is home to Wyoming Seminary (1844; co-educational), a well-known secondary school. Anthracite coal is mined here; there are railway repair and machine shops, and the borough manufactures hosiery, silk goods, underwear, and adding machines. Kingston (originally called “Kingstown,” named after Kings Towne, Rhode Island) was commonly referred to in its early days as the “Forty Township,” because the first permanent settlement was established by forty pioneers from Connecticut, who were sent by the Susquehanna Company to claim the area in 1769. In 1772, the famous “Forty Fort,” a stockade fortification, was built here, and it was rebuilt, strengthened, and enlarged in 1777. On July 3, 1778, around 400 men and boys gathered and, under the command of Colonel Zebulon Butler (1731-95), went out to confront a force of about 1,100 British troops and Indians led by Major John Butler and Old King (Sayenqueraghte). The Americans were defeated in the subsequent battle, and many of the captured individuals were massacred or tortured by the Indians. A monument near the site of the fort honors the battle and massacre. Kingston was incorporated as a borough in 1857. (See Wyoming Valley.)
KINGSTON, the capital and chief port of Jamaica, West Indies. Pop. (1901), 46,542, mostly negroes. It is situated in the county of Surrey, in the south-east of the island, standing on the north shore of a land-locked harbour—for its size one of the finest in the world—and with its suburbs occupying an area of 1080 acres. The town contains the principal government offices. It has a good water supply, a telephone service and a supply of both gas and electric light, while electric trams ply between the town and its suburbs. The Institute of Jamaica maintains a public library, museum and art gallery especially devoted to local interests. The old parish church in King Street, dating probably from 1692 was the burial-place of William Hall (1699) and Admiral Benbow (1702). The suburbs are remarkable for their beauty. The climate is dry and healthy, and the temperature ranges from 93° to 66° F. Kingston was founded in 1693, after the neighbouring town of Port Royal had been ruined by an earthquake in 1692. In 1703, Port Royal having been again laid waste by fire, Kingston became the commercial, and in 1872 the political, capital of the island. On several occasions Kingston was almost entirely consumed by fire, the conflagrations of 1780, 1843, 1862 and 1882 being particularly severe. On the 14th of January 1907 it was devastated by a terrible earthquake. A long immunity had led to the erection of many buildings not specially designed to withstand such shocks, and these and the fire which followed were so destructive that practically the whole town had to be rebuilt. (See Jamaica.)
KINGSTON, the capital and main port of Jamaica, West Indies. Pop. (1901), 46,542, mostly Black residents. It’s located in Surrey County, in the southeast part of the island, on the north shore of a sheltered harbor—considered one of the best in the world for its size—with its suburbs covering an area of 1,080 acres. The town has the main government offices. It features a good water supply, telephone service, and both gas and electric lighting, while electric trams run between the town and its suburbs. The Institute of Jamaica offers a public library, museum, and art gallery focused on local interests. The old parish church on King Street, likely dating back to 1692, is the burial site of William Hall (1699) and Admiral Benbow (1702). The suburbs are noted for their beauty. The climate is dry and healthy, with temperatures ranging from 93° to 66° F. Kingston was established in 1693 after the nearby town of Port Royal was devastated by an earthquake in 1692. By 1703, after another fire had destroyed Port Royal, Kingston became the commercial center, and in 1872, it became the political capital of the island. Kingston has suffered several significant fires, particularly in 1780, 1843, 1862, and 1882. On January 14, 1907, it was hit by a massive earthquake. A long period without significant earthquakes led to the construction of many buildings that weren’t designed to handle such events, and the subsequent fire was so destructive that almost the entire town had to be rebuilt. (See Jamaica.)

KINGSTON-ON-THAMES, a market town and municipal borough in the Kingston parliamentary division of Surrey, England, 11 m. S.W. of Charing Cross, London; on the London and South-Western railway. Pop. (1901), 34,375. It has a frontage with public walks and gardens upon the right bank of the Thames, and is in close proximity to Richmond and Bushey Parks, its pleasant situation rendering it a favourite residential district. The ancient wooden bridge over the river, which was in existence as early as 1223, was superseded by a structure of stone in 1827. The parish church of All Saints, chiefly Perpendicular in style, contains several brasses of the 15th century, and monuments by Chantrey and others; the grammar school, rebuilt in 1878, was originally founded as a chantry by Edward Lovekyn in 1305, and converted into a school by Queen Elizabeth. Near the parish church stood the chapel of St Mary, where it is alleged the Saxon kings were crowned. The ancient stone said to have been used as a throne at these coronations was removed to the market-place in 1850. At Norbiton, within the borough, is the Royal Cambridge Asylum for soldiers’ widows (1854). At Kingston Hill is an industrial and training school for girls, opened in 1892. There are large market gardens in the neighbourhood, and the town possesses oil-mills, flour-mills, breweries and brick and tile works. The borough is under a mayor, 8 aldermen and 24 councillors. Area, 1133 acres.
KINGSTON UPON THAMES, is a market town and municipal borough in the Kingston parliamentary division of Surrey, England, located 11 miles southwest of Charing Cross in London; it’s accessible via the London and South-Western railway. The population in 1901 was 34,375. The town has a beautiful waterfront with public walks and gardens along the right bank of the Thames and is close to Richmond and Bushey Parks, making it a popular residential area. An ancient wooden bridge over the river, which dates back to at least 1223, was replaced by a stone structure in 1827. The parish church of All Saints, primarily built in the Perpendicular style, features several 15th-century brasses and monuments by Chantrey and others. The grammar school, rebuilt in 1878, was originally founded as a chantry by Edward Lovekyn in 1305 and later turned into a school by Queen Elizabeth. Near the parish church was the chapel of St. Mary, where it is claimed the Saxon kings were crowned. The ancient stone believed to have served as a throne for these coronations was moved to the market place in 1850. In Norbiton, within the borough, there is the Royal Cambridge Asylum for soldiers' widows, established in 1854. Kingston Hill is home to an industrial and training school for girls, which opened in 1892. The surrounding area is known for its large market gardens, and the town has oil mills, flour mills, breweries, and brick and tile works. The borough operates under a mayor, 8 aldermen, and 24 councillors. The area covers 1,133 acres.
The position of Kingston (Cyningestun, Chingestune) on the Thames where there was probably a ford accounts for its origin; its later prosperity was due to the bridge which existed in 1223 and possibly long before. In 836 or 838 it was the meeting-place of the council under Ecgbert, and in the 10th century some if not all of the West Saxon kings were crowned at Kingston. In the time of Edward the Confessor it was a royal manor, and in 1086 included a church, five mills and three fisheries. Domesday also mentions bedels in Kingston. The original charters were granted by John in 1200 and 1209, by which the free men of Kingston were empowered to hold the town in fee-farm for ever, with all the liberties that it had while in the king’s hands. Henry III. sanctioned the gild-merchant which had existed previously, and granted other privileges. These charters were confirmed and extended by many succeeding monarchs down to Charles I. Henry VI. incorporated the town under two bailiffs. Except for temporary surrenders of their corporate privileges under Charles II. and James II. the government of the borough continued in its original form until 1835, when it was reincorporated under the title of mayor, aldermen and burgesses. Kingston returned two members to parliament in 1311, 1313, 1353 and 1373, but never afterwards. The market, still held on Saturdays, was granted by James I., and the Wednesday market by Charles II. To these a cattle-market on Thursdays has been added by the corporation. The only remaining fair, now held on the 13th of November, was granted by Henry III., and was then held on the morrow of All Souls and seven days following.
The location of Kingston (Cyningestun, Chingestune) on the Thames, where there was likely a ford, explains its origin; its later growth was due to the bridge that existed in 1223 and possibly even earlier. In 836 or 838, it served as the meeting place for a council led by Ecgbert, and in the 10th century, some or all of the West Saxon kings were crowned at Kingston. During Edward the Confessor's reign, it was a royal manor and, in 1086, included a church, five mills, and three fisheries. Domesday also notes bedels in Kingston. The original charters were granted by John in 1200 and 1209, which allowed the free men of Kingston to hold the town in fee-farm forever, with all the rights it had while under the king's control. Henry III approved the existing gild-merchant and granted additional privileges. These charters were confirmed and expanded by many succeeding monarchs up to Charles I. Henry VI incorporated the town under two bailiffs. Aside from temporary losses of their corporate privileges under Charles II and James II, the borough's government continued in its original form until 1835, when it was re-established under the title of mayor, aldermen, and burgesses. Kingston sent two members to parliament in 1311, 1313, 1353, and 1373, but not afterward. The market, which is still held on Saturdays, was granted by James I, and the Wednesday market by Charles II. In addition, the corporation has added a cattle market on Thursdays. The only remaining fair, now held on November 13, was granted by Henry III and was originally held the day after All Souls and for the following seven days.

Robert Pierrepont (1584-1643), second son of Sir Henry Pierrepont of Holme Pierrepont, Nottinghamshire, was member of parliament for Nottingham in 1601, and was created Baron Pierrepont and Viscount Newark in 1627, being made earl of Kingston-upon-Hull in the following year. He remained neutral on the outbreak of the Civil War; but afterwards he joined the king, and was appointed lieutenant-general of the counties of Lincoln, Rutland, Huntingdon, Cambridge and Norfolk. Whilst defending Gainsborough he was taken prisoner, and was accidentally killed on the 25th of July 1643 while being conveyed to Hull. The earl had five sons, one of whom was Francis Pierrepont (d. 1659), a colonel in the parliamentary army and afterwards a member of the Long Parliament; and another was William Pierrepont (q.v.), a leading member of the parliamentary party.
Robert Pierrepont (1584-1643), the second son of Sir Henry Pierrepont of Holme Pierrepont, Nottinghamshire, was a member of parliament for Nottingham in 1601. He was made Baron Pierrepont and Viscount Newark in 1627, and became the Earl of Kingston-upon-Hull the following year. He initially stayed neutral when the Civil War broke out but later joined the king, being appointed lieutenant-general for the counties of Lincoln, Rutland, Huntingdon, Cambridge, and Norfolk. While defending Gainsborough, he was taken prisoner and was accidentally killed on July 25, 1643, during his transport to Hull. The earl had five sons, one of whom was Francis Pierrepont (d. 1659), a colonel in the parliamentary army and later a member of the Long Parliament; another was William Pierrepont (q.v.), a prominent figure in the parliamentary party.
His son Henry Pierrepont (1606-1680), 2nd earl of Kingston and 1st marquess of Dorchester, was member of parliament for Nottinghamshire, and was called to the House of Lords as Baron Pierrepont in 1641. During the earlier part of the Civil War he was at Oxford in attendance upon the king, whom he represented at the negotiations at Uxbridge. In 1645 he was made a privy 822 councillor and created marquess of Dorchester; but in 1647 he compounded for his estates by paying a large fine to the parliamentarians. Afterwards the marquess, who was always fond of books, spent his time mainly in London engaged in the study of medicine and law, his devotion to the former science bringing upon him a certain amount of ridicule and abuse. After the Restoration he was restored to the privy council, and was made recorder of Nottingham and a fellow of the Royal Society. Dorchester had two daughters, but no sons, and when he died in London on the 8th of December 1680 the title of marquess of Dorchester became extinct. He was succeeded as 3rd earl of Kingston by Robert (d. 1682), a son of Robert Pierrepont of Thoresby, Nottinghamshire, and as 4th earl by Robert’s brother William (d. 1690).
His son Henry Pierrepont (1606-1680), the 2nd earl of Kingston and 1st marquess of Dorchester, was a member of parliament for Nottinghamshire and was named Baron Pierrepont in the House of Lords in 1641. During the early part of the Civil War, he was in Oxford with the king, whom he represented in the negotiations at Uxbridge. In 1645, he became a privy councillor and was created marquess of Dorchester; however, in 1647, he paid a large fine to the parliamentarians to settle the issues with his estates. After that, the marquess, who always had a passion for books, primarily spent his time in London studying medicine and law, which brought him some mockery and criticism. After the Restoration, he was reinstated to the privy council, became the recorder of Nottingham, and was made a fellow of the Royal Society. Dorchester had two daughters but no sons, and when he died in London on December 8, 1680, the title of marquess of Dorchester became extinct. He was succeeded as the 3rd earl of Kingston by Robert (d. 1682), the son of Robert Pierrepont of Thoresby, Nottinghamshire, and as the 4th earl by Robert’s brother William (d. 1690).
Evelyn Pierrepont (c. 1655-1726), 5th earl and 1st duke of Kingston, another brother had been member of parliament for East Retford before his accession to the peerage. While serving as one of the commissioners for the union with Scotland he was created marquess of Dorchester in 1706, and took a leading part in the business of the House of Lords. He was made a privy councillor and in 1715 was created duke of Kingston; afterwards serving as lord privy seal and lord president of the council. The duke, who died on the 5th of March 1726, was a prominent figure in the fashionable society of his day. He was twice married, and had five daughters, among whom was Lady Mary Wortley Montagu (q.v.), and one son, William, earl of Kingston (d. 1713).
Evelyn Pierrepont (c. 1655-1726), the 5th earl and 1st duke of Kingston, had another brother who was a member of parliament for East Retford before he became a peer. While serving as one of the commissioners for the union with Scotland, he was made marquess of Dorchester in 1706 and played a significant role in the operations of the House of Lords. He became a privy councillor and was created duke of Kingston in 1715, later serving as lord privy seal and lord president of the council. The duke, who passed away on March 5, 1726, was a well-known figure in the fashionable society of his time. He was married twice and had five daughters, one of whom was Lady Mary Wortley Montagu (q.v.), and one son, William, earl of Kingston (d. 1713).
The latter’s son, Evelyn Pierrepont (1711-1773), succeeded his grandfather as second duke of Kingston. When the rebellion of 1745 broke out he raised a regiment called “Kingston’s light horse,” which distinguished itself at Culloden. The duke, who attained the rank of general in the army, is described by Horace Walpole as “a very weak man, of the greatest beauty and finest person in England.” He is chiefly famous for his connexion with Elizabeth Chudleigh, who claimed to be duchess of Kingston (q.v.). The Kingston titles became extinct on the duke’s death without children on the 23rd of September 1773, but on the death of the duchess in 1788 the estates came to his nephew Charles Meadows (1737-1816), who took the name of Pierrepont and was created Baron Pierrepont and Viscount Newark in 1796, and Earl Manvers in 1806. His descendant, the present Earl Manvers, is thus the representative of the dukes of Kingston.
The son of the latter, Evelyn Pierrepont (1711-1773), became the second duke of Kingston after his grandfather. When the rebellion of 1745 started, he raised a regiment called “Kingston’s light horse,” which made a name for itself at Culloden. The duke, who reached the rank of general in the army, is described by Horace Walpole as “a very weak man, of the greatest beauty and finest person in England.” He is mainly known for his connection with Elizabeth Chudleigh, who claimed to be the duchess of Kingston (q.v.). The Kingston titles died out when the duke passed away without children on September 23, 1773, but when the duchess died in 1788, the estates went to his nephew Charles Meadows (1737-1816), who adopted the name Pierrepont and was made Baron Pierrepont and Viscount Newark in 1796, and Earl Manvers in 1806. His descendant, the current Earl Manvers, is therefore the representative of the dukes of Kingston.

KINGSTOWN, a seaport of Co. Dublin, Ireland, in the south parliamentary division, at the south-eastern extremity of Dublin Bay, 6 m. S.E. from Dublin by the Dublin & South-Eastern railway. Pop. of urban district (1901), 17,377. It is a large seaport and favourite watering-place, and possesses several fine streets, with electric trams, and terraces commanding picturesque sea views. The original name of Kingstown was Dunleary, which was exchanged for the present designation after the embarkation of George IV. at the port on his return from Ireland in 1821, an event which is also commemorated by a granite obelisk erected near the harbour. The town was a mere fishing village until the construction of an extensive harbour, begun in 1817 and finally completed in 1859. The eastern pier has a length of 3500 ft. and the western of 4950 ft., the total area enclosed being about 250 acres, with a varying depth of from 15 to 27 ft. Kingstown is the station of the City of Dublin Steam Packet Company’s mail steamers to Holyhead in connexion with the London & North-Western railway. It has large export and import trade both with Great Britain and foreign countries. The principal export is cattle, and the principal imports corn and provisions. Kingstown is the centre of an extensive sea-fishery; and there are three yacht clubs: the Royal Irish, Royal St George and Royal Alfred.
KINGSTOWN, is a seaport in County Dublin, Ireland, located in the southeastern part of Dublin Bay, about 6 miles southeast of Dublin via the Dublin & South-Eastern railway. The urban district had a population of 17,377 in 1901. It is a significant seaport and a popular seaside resort, featuring several nice streets, electric trams, and terraces with beautiful views of the sea. The original name of Kingstown was Dunleary, which was changed after George IV embarked from the port on his return from Ireland in 1821. This event is also marked by a granite obelisk near the harbor. The town started as a fishing village until the construction of a large harbor, which began in 1817 and was completed in 1859. The eastern pier measures 3,500 feet in length, while the western pier is 4,950 feet long, creating a total enclosed area of about 250 acres, with varying depths from 15 to 27 feet. Kingstown serves as the departure point for the City of Dublin Steam Packet Company’s mail steamers to Holyhead, connecting to the London & North-Western railway. It has a significant export and import trade with Great Britain and other countries, with cattle as the main export and corn and provisions as the main imports. Kingstown is also the center for a large fishing industry and is home to three yacht clubs: the Royal Irish, Royal St George, and Royal Alfred.

KING-TÊ CHÊN, a town near Fu-liang Hien, in the province of Kiang-si, China, and the principal seat of the porcelain manufacture in that empire. Being situated on the south bank of the river Chang, it was in ancient times known as Chang-nan Chên, or “town on the south of the river Chang.” It is unwalled, and straggles along the bank of the river. The streets are narrow, and crowded with a population which is reckoned at a million, the vast majority of whom find employment at the porcelain factories. Since the Ch’in dynasty (557-589) this has been the great trade of the place, which was then called by its earlier name. In the reign of King-tê (Chên-tsung) of the Sung dynasty, early in the 11th century A.D., a manufactory was founded there for making vases and objects of art for the use of the emperor. Hence its adoption of its present title. Since the time of the Ming dynasty a magistrate has been specially appointed to superintend the factories and to despatch at regulated intervals the imperial porcelain to Peking. The town is situated on a vast plain surrounded by mountains, and boasts of three thousand porcelain furnaces. These constantly burning fires are the causes of frequent conflagrations, and at night give the city the appearance of a place on fire. The people are as a rule orderly, though they have on several occasions shown a hostile bearing towards foreign visitors. This is probably to be accounted for by a desire to keep their art as far as possible a mystery, which appears less unreasonable when it is remembered that the two kinds of earth of which the porcelain is made are not found at King-tê Chên, but are brought from K’i-mun in the neighbouring province of Ngan-hui, and that there is therefore no reason why the trade should be necessarily maintained at that place. The two kinds of earth are known as pai-tun-tsze, which is a fine fusible quartz powder, and kaolin, which is not fusible, and is said to give strength to the ware. Both materials are prepared in the shape of bricks at K’i-mun, and are brought down the Chang to the seat of the manufacture.
KING-TÊ CHÊN, is a town near Fu-liang Hien in the Kiang-si province of China and is the main center for porcelain manufacturing in the country. Located on the south bank of the Chang River, it was historically known as Chang-nan Chên, meaning “town south of the Chang River.” The town has no walls and stretches along the riverbank. The streets are narrow and filled with a population estimated at a million, most of whom work at the porcelain factories. Since the Ch’in dynasty (557-589), porcelain has been the major industry here, using its earlier name. During the reign of King-tê (Chên-tsung) of the Sung dynasty in the early 11th century CE, a factory was established to create vases and art pieces for the emperor, leading to its current name. Since the Ming dynasty, a magistrate has been specifically appointed to oversee the factories and regularly send imperial porcelain to Peking. The town lies on a vast plain surrounded by mountains and has three thousand porcelain kilns. These constantly burning fires often cause fires to break out and at night make the city look like it’s on fire. Generally, the people are orderly, though they have shown hostility towards foreign visitors on several occasions, likely due to a wish to keep their craft somewhat mysterious. This wish seems less unreasonable when considering that the two types of clay used for porcelain are not found in King-tê Chên but are instead sourced from K’i-mun in the nearby Ngan-hui province, which means the trade doesn’t have to be restricted to this location. The two types of clay are known as pai-tun-tsze, a fine fusible quartz powder, and kaolin, which is non-fusible and is said to give strength to the ware. Both materials are formed into bricks at K’i-mun and transported down the Chang River to the manufacturing site.

KINGUSSIE, a town of Inverness-shire, Scotland. Pop. (1901), 987. It lies at a height of 750 ft. above sea-level, on the left bank of the Spey, here crossed by a bridge, 46½ m. S. by S.E. of Inverness by the Highland railway. It was founded towards the end of the 18th century by the duke of Gordon, in the hope of its becoming a centre of woollen manufactures. This expectation, however, was not realized, but in time the place grew popular as a health resort, the scenery in every direction being remarkably picturesque. On the right bank of the river is Ruthven, where James Macpherson was born in 1736, and on the left bank, some 2½ m. from Kingussie, is the house of Belleville (previously known as Raitts) which he acquired from Mackintosh of Borlum and where he died in 1796. The mansion, renamed Balavil by Macpherson’s great-grandson, was burned down in 1903, when the fine library (including some MSS. of Sir David Brewster, who had married the poet’s second daughter) was destroyed. Of Ruthven Castle, one of the residences of the Comyns of Badenoch, only the ruins of the walls remain. Here the Jacobites made an ineffectual rally under Lord George Murray after the battle of Culloden.
KINGUSSIE, is a town in Inverness-shire, Scotland. Population (1901): 987. It’s located at an elevation of 750 ft. above sea level, on the left bank of the Spey, which is crossed by a bridge, 46.5 miles south-southeast of Inverness by the Highland railway. It was established in the late 18th century by the Duke of Gordon, who hoped it would become a hub for wool manufacturing. This didn't happen, but over time, the town became popular as a health resort, with stunning scenery in every direction. On the right bank of the river is Ruthven, where James Macpherson was born in 1736, and on the left bank, about 2.5 miles from Kingussie, is Belleville (formerly known as Raitts), which he acquired from Mackintosh of Borlum and where he passed away in 1796. The mansion, renamed Balavil by Macpherson’s great-grandson, was destroyed by fire in 1903, taking with it a valuable library that included some manuscripts from Sir David Brewster, who had married the poet’s second daughter. Only the ruins of Ruthven Castle, one of the residences of the Comyns of Badenoch, remain. The Jacobites attempted a failed rally here under Lord George Murray after the battle of Culloden.

KING WILLIAM’S TOWN, a town of South Africa, in the Cape province and on the Buffalo River, 42 m. by rail W.N.W. of the port of East London. Pop. (1904), 9506, of whom 5987 were whites. It is the headquarters of the Cape Mounted Police. “King,” as the town is locally called, stands 1275 ft. above the sea at the foot of the Amatola Mountains, and in the midst of a thickly populated agricultural district. The town is well laid out and most of the public buildings and merchants’ stores are built of stone. There are manufactories of sweets and jams, candles, soap, matches and leather, and a large trade in wool, hides and grains is done with East London. “King” is also an important entrepôt for trade with the natives throughout Kaffraria, with which there is direct railway communication. Founded by Sir Benjamin D’Urban in May 1835 during the Kaffir War of that year, the town is named after William IV. It was abandoned in December 1836, but was reoccupied in 1846 and was the capital of British Kaffraria from its creation in 1847 to its incorporation in 1865 with Cape Colony. Many of the colonists in the neighbouring districts are descendants of members of the German legion disbanded after the Crimean War and provided with homes in Cape Colony; hence such names as Berlin, Potsdam, Braunschweig, Frankfurt, given to settlements in this part of the country.
KING WILLIAM'S TOWN,, a town in South Africa, located in the Cape province along the Buffalo River, is 42 miles by rail northwest of the port of East London. The population was 9,506 in 1904, with 5,987 being white residents. This town is the headquarters of the Cape Mounted Police. Locally referred to as “King,” it sits 1,275 feet above sea level at the base of the Amatola Mountains, surrounded by a densely populated agricultural area. The town is well-planned, and most public buildings and shops are made of stone. There are factories producing sweets and jams, candles, soap, matches, and leather, and a significant trade in wool, hides, and grains takes place with East London. “King” is also a key hub for trade with native communities across Kaffraria, with which it has direct railway links. Founded by Sir Benjamin D’Urban in May 1835 during that year's Kaffir War, the town is named after William IV. It was abandoned in December 1836 but was reoccupied in 1846 and served as the capital of British Kaffraria from its establishment in 1847 until it merged with Cape Colony in 1865. Many of the settlers in the nearby areas are descendants of members of the German legion disbanded after the Crimean War, who were given resettlement in Cape Colony; this explains the names like Berlin, Potsdam, Braunschweig, and Frankfurt assigned to communities in this region.

KINKAJOU (Cercoleptes caudivolvulus or Potos flavus), the single species of an aberrant genus of the raccoon family (Procyonidae). It has been split up into a number of local races. A 823 native of the forests of the warmer parts of South and Central America, the kinkajou is about the size of a cat, of a uniform pale, yellowish-brown colour, nocturnal and arboreal in its habits, feeding on fruit, honey, eggs and small birds and mammals, and is of a tolerably gentle disposition and easily tamed. (See Carnivora.)
Kinkajou (Cercoleptes caudivolvulus or Potos flavus), the only species of a unique genus in the raccoon family (Procyonidae). It has been divided into several local varieties. A 823 native to the forests in the warmer regions of South and Central America, the kinkajou is about the size of a cat, with a uniform light yellowish-brown color, nocturnal and tree-dwelling in its habits, feeding on fruit, honey, eggs, and small birds and mammals, and is quite gentle in nature and easily tamed. (See Carnivora.)

KINKEL, JOHANN GOTTFRIED (1815-1882), German poet, was born on the 11th of August 1815 at Obercassel near Bonn. Having studied theology at Bonn and afterwards in Berlin, he established himself at Bonn in 1836 as privat docent of theology, later became master at the gymnasium there, and was for a short time assistant preacher in Cologne. Changing his religious opinions, he abandoned theology and delivered lectures on the history of art, in which he had become interested on a journey to Italy in 1837. In 1846 he was appointed extraordinary professor of the history of art at Bonn University. For his share in the revolution in the Palatinate in 1849 Kinkel was arrested and, sentenced to penal servitude for life, was interned in the fortress of Spandau. His friend Carl Schurz contrived in November 1850 to effect his escape to England, whence he went to the United States. Returning to London in 1853, he for several years taught German and lectured on German literature, and in 1858 founded the German paper Hermann. In 1866 he accepted the professorship of archaeology and the history of art at the Polytechnikum in Zürich, in which city he died on the 13th of November 1882.
KINKEL, JOHANN GOTTFRIED (1815-1882), German poet, was born on August 11, 1815, in Obercassel near Bonn. He studied theology at Bonn and later in Berlin, and in 1836, he became a privat docent of theology in Bonn. He then became a master at the gymnasium there and served briefly as an assistant preacher in Cologne. After changing his religious views, he left theology and started giving lectures on art history, a subject he became interested in during a trip to Italy in 1837. In 1846, he was appointed extraordinary professor of art history at Bonn University. For his involvement in the revolution in the Palatinate in 1849, Kinkel was arrested, sentenced to life imprisonment, and placed in the fortress of Spandau. His friend Carl Schurz managed to help him escape to England in November 1850, from where he moved to the United States. He returned to London in 1853, where he taught German and lectured on German literature, and in 1858, he founded the German newspaper Hermann. In 1866, he took the position of professor of archaeology and art history at the Polytechnikum in Zürich, where he died on November 13, 1882.
The popularity which Kinkel enjoyed in his day was hardly justified by his talent; his poetry is of the sweetly sentimental type which was much in vogue in Germany about the middle of the 19th century. His Gedichte first appeared in 1843, and have gone through several editions. He is to be seen to most advantage in the verse romances, Otto der Schütz, eine rheinische Geschichte in zwölf Abenteuern (1846) which in 1896 had attained its 75th edition, and Der Grobschmied von Antwerpen (1868). Among Kinkel’s other works may be mentioned the tragedy Nimrod (1857), and his history of art, Geschichte der bildenden Künste bei den christlichen Völkern (1845). Kinkel’s first wife, Johanna, née Mockel (1810-1858), assisted her husband in his literary work, and was herself an author of considerable merit. Her admirable autobiographical novel Hans Ibeles in London was not published until 1860, after her death. She also wrote on musical subjects.
The popularity that Kinkel had in his time was hardly deserved based on his talent; his poetry is of the sweetly sentimental kind that was very popular in Germany around the middle of the 19th century. His Gedichte first came out in 1843 and have gone through several editions. He shines the most in his verse romances, Otto der Schütz, eine rheinische Geschichte in zwölf Abenteuern (1846), which had reached its 75th edition by 1896, and Der Grobschmied von Antwerpen (1868). Other notable works by Kinkel include the tragedy Nimrod (1857) and his art history, Geschichte der bildenden Künste bei den christlichen Völkern (1845). Kinkel's first wife, Johanna, née Mockel (1810-1858), helped her husband with his literary work and was herself a talented author. Her remarkable autobiographical novel Hans Ibeles in London was published posthumously in 1860. She also wrote about music.
See A. Strodtmann, Gottfried Kinkel (2 vols., Hamburg, 1851); and O. Henne am Rhyn, G. Kinkel, ein Lebensbild (Zürich, 1883).
See A. Strodtmann, Gottfried Kinkel (2 vols., Hamburg, 1851); and O. Henne am Rhyn, G. Kinkel, ein Lebensbild (Zürich, 1883).

KINNING PARK, a southern suburb of Glasgow, Scotland. Pop. (1901), 13,852. It is situated on the left bank of the Clyde between Glasgow, with which it is connected by tramway and subway, and Govan. Since 1850 it has grown from a rural village to a busy centre mainly inhabited by artisans and labourers. Its principal industries are engineering, bread and biscuit baking, soap-making and paint-making.
KINNING PARK, is a southern suburb of Glasgow, Scotland. Population (1901): 13,852. It’s located on the left bank of the Clyde, between Glasgow, which is connected by tram and subway, and Govan. Since 1850, it has transformed from a rural village into a busy center mainly inhabited by workers and tradespeople. Its main industries include engineering, baking bread and biscuits, making soap, and producing paint.

KINNOR (Gr. κινύρα), the Hebrew name for an ancient stringed instrument, the first mentioned in the Bible (Gen. iv. 21), where it is now always translated “harp.” The identification of the instrument has been much discussed, but, from the standpoint of the history of musical instruments, the weight of evidence is in favour of the view that the Semitic kinnor is the Greek cithara (q.v.). This instrument was already in use before 2000 B.C. among the Semitic races and in a higher state of development than it ever attained in Greece during the best classic period. It is unlikely that an instrument (which also appears on Hebrew coins) so widely known and used in various parts of Asia Minor in remote times, and occurring among the Hittite sculptures, should pass unmentioned in the Bible, with the exception of the verses in Dan. iii.
KINNOR (Gr. κινύρα), the Hebrew name for an ancient string instrument, which is first mentioned in the Bible (Gen. iv. 21) and is consistently translated as “harp.” The identification of this instrument has been widely debated, but, from the perspective of the history of musical instruments, the evidence strongly supports the idea that the Semitic kinnor corresponds to the Greek cithara (q.v.). This instrument was already in use among Semitic peoples before 2000 BCE, and it reached a level of development that surpassed what it achieved in Greece during its peak classical period. It's unlikely that an instrument (which also appears on Hebrew coins) well-known and used in various parts of Asia Minor in ancient times, and found among Hittite sculptures, would go unmentioned in the Bible, aside from the references in Dan. iii.

KINO, the West African name of an astringent drug introduced into European medicine in 1757 by John Fothergill. When described by him it was believed to have been brought from the river Gambia in West Africa, and when first imported it was sold in England as Gummi rubrum astringens gambiense. It was obtained from Pterocarpus erinaceus. The drug now recognized as the legitimate kind is East Indian, Malabar or Amboyna kino, which is the evaporated juice obtained from incisions in the trunk of Pterocarpus Marsupium (Leguminosae), though Botany Bay or eucalyptus kino is used in Australia. When exuding from the tree it resembles red-currant jelly, but hardens in a few hours after exposure to the air and sun. When sufficiently dried it is packed into wooden boxes for exportation. When these are opened it breaks up into angular brittle fragments of a blackish-red colour and shining surface. In cold water it is only partially dissolved, leaving a pale flocculent residue which is soluble in boiling water but deposited again on cooling. It is soluble in alcohol and caustic alkalis, but not in ether.
KINO, is the West African name for astringent medicine introduced into European medicine in 1757 by John Fothergill. He described it as having been brought from the Gambia River in West Africa, and when it was first imported, it was sold in England as Gummi rubrum astringens gambiense. It was sourced from Pterocarpus erinaceus. The drug now recognized as the true type is East Indian, specifically Malabar or Amboyna kino, which is the evaporated juice collected from cuts in the trunk of Pterocarpus Marsupium (Leguminosae), although in Australia, Botany Bay or eucalyptus kino is also used. When it seeps from the tree, it looks like red-currant jelly, but it hardens within hours after being exposed to air and sunlight. Once it's dried enough, it is packed into wooden boxes for export. When these boxes are opened, the content crumbles into angular brittle pieces that are blackish-red with a shiny surface. In cold water, it only partially dissolves, leaving behind a pale fluffy residue that dissolves in boiling water but reforms when cooled. It dissolves in alcohol and strong alkalis, but not in ether.
The chief constituent of the drug is kino-tannic acid, which is present to the extent of about 75 %; it is only very slightly soluble in cold water. It is not absorbed at all from the stomach and only very slowly from the intestine. Other constituents are gum, pyrocatechin, and kinoin, a crystalline neutral principle. Kino-red is also present in small quantity, being an oxidation product of kino-tannic acid. The useful preparations of this drug are the tincture (dose ½-1 drachm), and the pulvis kino compositus (dose 5-20 gr.) which contains one part of opium in twenty. The drug is frequently used in diarrhoea, its value being due to the relative insolubility of kino-tannic acid, which enables it to affect the lower part of the intestine. In this respect it is parallel with catechu. It is not now used as a gargle, antiseptics being recognized as the rational treatment for sore-throat.
The main ingredient of the drug is kino-tannic acid, making up about 75%; it is only slightly soluble in cold water. It isn’t absorbed at all in the stomach and is absorbed only very slowly in the intestine. Other ingredients include gum, pyrocatechin, and kinoin, a neutral crystalline substance. Kino-red is also present in small amounts, as it is an oxidation product of kino-tannic acid. The useful preparations of this drug are the tincture (dose ½-1 drachm) and the pulvis kino compositus (dose 5-20 gr.), which contains one part of opium for every twenty parts. This drug is commonly used for diarrhea, its effectiveness coming from the relative insolubility of kino-tannic acid, which allows it to act on the lower part of the intestine. In this way, it is similar to catechu. It is no longer used as a gargle, as antiseptics are now recognized as the appropriate treatment for sore throats.

![]() |
(After Hartog, from Cambridge Natural History, vol. ii., “Worms, &c.,” by permission of Messrs. Macmillan & Co., Ltd.) |
b, bristle; cs, caudal spine; ph, pharynx; s & s′, the spines on the two segments of the proboscis; sg, salivary glands; st, stomach. |
The body is enclosed in a stout cuticle, prolonged in places into spines and bristles. These are especially conspicuous in two rings round the proboscis and in the two posterior caudal spines. The body is divided into eleven segments and the protrusible proboscis apparently into two, and the cuticle of the central segment is thickened to form three plates, one dorsal and two ventrolateral. The cuticle is secreted by an epidermis in which no cell boundaries are to be seen; it sends out processes into the bristles. The mouth opens at the tip of the retractile proboscis; it leads into a short thin-walled tube which opens into an oval muscular gizzard lined with a thick cuticle; at the posterior end of this are some minute glands and then follows a large stomach slightly sacculated in each segment, this tapers through the rectum to the terminal anus. A pair of pear-shaped, ciliated glands inside lie in the eighth segment and open on the ninth. They are regarded as kidneys. The nervous system consists of a ganglion or brain, which lies dorsally about the level of the junction of the pharynx and the stomach, a nerve ring and a segmented neutral cord. The only sense organs described are eyes, which occur in some species, and may number one to four pairs.
The body is covered by a thick outer layer, which extends in some areas into spines and bristles. These are especially noticeable in two rings around the proboscis and in the two back caudal spines. The body is divided into eleven segments, and the extendable proboscis is thought to be made up of two parts. The outer layer of the central segment is thickened to form three plates: one on the back and two on the sides. This outer layer is produced by a skin layer where no clear cell boundaries are visible; it sends out extensions into the bristles. The mouth is located at the tip of the retractable proboscis and leads into a short, thin-walled tube that opens into an oval muscular gizzard lined with a thick outer layer. At the back end of this gizzard are some tiny glands, followed by a large stomach that is slightly segmented in each part. This stomach narrows through the rectum to the rear anus. Inside the eighth segment, there are a pair of pear-shaped, ciliated glands that open into the ninth segment, and these are considered kidneys. The nervous system includes a ganglion or brain located on the back at the level where the pharynx meets the stomach, along with a nerve ring and a segmented nerve cord. The only sense organs identified are eyes, which can be found in some species and may range from one to four pairs.
The Kinorhyncha are dioecious. The testes reach forward to the fifth and even to the second segment, and open one each side of the anus. The ovaries open in a similar position but never reach farther forward than the fourth segment. The external openings in the male are armed with a pair of hollowed spines. The animals are probably oviparous.
The Kinorhyncha are separate sexes. The testes extend to the fifth segment and sometimes to the second segment, opening on either side of the anus. The ovaries open in a similar location but don't extend beyond the fourth segment. The male has external openings equipped with a pair of hollow spines. These animals are likely oviparous.
Literature.—F. Dujardin, Ann. Sci. Nat., 3rd series, Zool. xv. 1851, p. 158; W. Reinhard, Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. xlv. 1887, pp. 401-467, t. xx.-xxii.; C. Zelinka, Verh. d. Deutsch. Zool. Ges., 1894.
Literature.—F. Dujardin, Ann. Sci. Nat., 3rd series, Zool. xv. 1851, p. 158; W. Reinhard, Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. xlv. 1887, pp. 401-467, t. xx.-xxii.; C. Zelinka, Verh. d. Deutsch. Zool. Ges., 1894.

KINROSS-SHIRE, a county of Scotland, bounded N. and W. by Perthshire, on the extreme S.W. by Clackmannanshire and S. and E. by Fifeshire. Its area is 52,410 acres or 81.9 sq. m. Excepting Clackmannan it is the smallest county in Scotland both in point of area and of population. On its confines the shire is hilly. To the N. and W. are several peaks of the Ochils, the highest being Innerdouny (1621 ft.) and Mellock (1573); to the E. are the heights of the Lomond group, such as White Craigs (1492 ft.) and Bishop Hill; to the S. are Benarty (1131 ft.) on the Fife border and farther west the Cleish Hills, reaching in Dumglow an altitude of 1241 ft. With the exception of the Leven, which drains Loch Leven and of which only the first mile of its course belongs to the county, all the streams are short. Green’s Burn, the North and South Queich, and the Gairney are the principal. Loch Leven, the only lake, is remarkable rather for its associations than its natural features. The scenery on the Devon, west of the Crook, the river here forming the boundary with Perthshire, is of a lovely and romantic character. At one place the stream rushes through the rocky gorge with a loud clacking sound which has given to the spot the name of the Devil’s Mill, and later it flows under the Rumbling Bridge. In reality there are two bridges, one built over the other, in the same vertical line. The lower one dates from 1713 and is unused; but the loftier and larger one, erected in 1816, commands a beautiful view. A little farther west is the graceful cascade of the Caldron Linn, the fall of which was lessened, however, by a collapse of the rocks in 1886.
KINROSS-SHIRE, is a county in Scotland, bordered to the north and west by Perthshire, to the extreme southwest by Clackmannanshire, and to the south and east by Fifeshire. Its total area is 52,410 acres or 81.9 square miles. Except for Clackmannan, it is the smallest county in Scotland in terms of both area and population. The county has hilly terrain along its borders. To the north and west are several peaks of the Ochils, with the highest being Innerdouny (1621 ft.) and Mellock (1573 ft.); to the east are the heights of the Lomond group, including White Craigs (1492 ft.) and Bishop Hill; to the south, on the Fife border, is Benarty (1131 ft.), and further west are the Cleish Hills, which reach an altitude of 1241 ft. Besides the Leven, which drains Loch Leven (with only the first mile of its course in the county), all the streams are short. The main ones are Green’s Burn, North Queich, South Queich, and the Gairney. Loch Leven, the only lake in the area, is known more for its historical significance than its natural features. The scenery along the Devon, west of the Crook—where the river forms the boundary with Perthshire—is lovely and romantic. At one spot, the stream rushes through a rocky gorge with a loud clacking noise, giving rise to the name Devil’s Mill, and later it flows beneath the Rumbling Bridge. There are actually two bridges, one built over the other, aligned vertically. The lower bridge, built in 1713, is no longer in use; however, the taller and larger one, completed in 1816, offers a stunning view. A little further west is the graceful Caldron Linn waterfall, although its flow was diminished due to a rock collapse in 1886.
Geology.—The northern higher portion of the county is occupied by the Lower Old Red Sandstone volcanic lavas and agglomerates of the Ochils. The coarse character of some of the lower agglomerate beds is well seen in the gorge at Rumbling Bridge. The beds dip gently towards the S.S.E.; in a north-easterly direction they contain more sandy sediments, and the agglomerates and breccias frequently become conglomerates. The plain of Kinross is occupied by the soft sandstones, marls and conglomerates of the upper Old Red Sandstone, which rest unconformably upon the lower division with a strong dip. Southward and eastward these rocks dip conformably beneath the Lower Carboniferous cement stone series of the Calciferous Sandstone group. The overlying Carboniferous limestone occupies only a small area in the south and east of the county. Intrusive basalt sheets have been intercalated between some of the Carboniferous strata, and the superior resisting power of this rock has been the cause of the existence of West Lomond, Benarty, Cleish Hills and Bishop Hill, which are formed of soft marls and sandstones capped by basalt. The Hurlet limestone is worked on the Lomond and Bishop Hills. East- and west-running dikes of basalt are found in the north-east of the county, traversing the Old Red volcanic rocks. Kames of gravel and sand and similar glacial detritus are widely spread over the older rocks.
Geology.—The northern higher part of the county is made up of the Lower Old Red Sandstone volcanic lavas and agglomerates of the Ochils. The rough nature of some of the lower agglomerate layers is clearly visible in the gorge at Rumbling Bridge. The layers gently slope towards the S.S.E.; in a north-easterly direction, they have more sandy sediments, and the agglomerates and breccias often turn into conglomerates. The Kinross plain is made up of the soft sandstones, marls, and conglomerates of the upper Old Red Sandstone, which rest unconformably on the lower division at a steep angle. To the south and east, these rocks dip smoothly beneath the Lower Carboniferous cement stone series of the Calciferous Sandstone group. The overlying Carboniferous limestone covers only a small area in the south and east of the county. Intrusive basalt sheets are layered between some of the Carboniferous strata, and the superior durability of this rock has created West Lomond, Benarty, Cleish Hills, and Bishop Hill, which are made of soft marls and sandstones topped with basalt. The Hurlet limestone is extracted in the Lomond and Bishop Hills. North- and south-running dikes of basalt are found in the northeastern part of the county, cutting through the Old Red volcanic rocks. Kames of gravel and sand, along with similar glacial debris, are widely spread over the older rocks.
Climate and Industries.—The lower part of the county is generally well sheltered and adapted to all kinds of crops; and the climate, though wet and cold, offers no hindrance to high farming. The average annual rainfall is 35.5 inches, and the temperature for the year is 48° F., for January 38° F. and for July 59°.5 F. More than half of the holdings exceed 50 acres each. Much of the land has been reclaimed, the mossy tracts when drained and cultivated being very fertile. Barley is the principal crop, and oats also is grown largely, but the acreage under wheat is small. Turnips and potatoes are the chief green crops, the former the more important. The raising of livestock is pursued with great enterprise, the hilly land being well suited for this industry, although many cattle are pastured on the lowland farms. The cattle are mainly a native breed, which has been much improved by crossing. The number of sheep is high for the area. Although most of the horses are used for agricultural work, a considerable proportion are kept solely for breeding. Tartans, plaids and other woollens, and linen are manufactured at Kinross and Milnathort, which is besides an important centre for livestock sales. Brewing and milling are also carried on in the county town, but stock-raising and agriculture are the staple interests. The North British railway company’s lines, from the south and west run through the county via Kinross, and the Mid-Fife line branches off at Mawcarse Junction.
Climate and Industries.—The lower part of the county is generally well sheltered and suitable for various crops; the climate, although wet and cold, doesn't prevent successful farming. The average annual rainfall is 35.5 inches, with an average temperature of 48°F for the year, 38°F in January, and 59.5°F in July. More than half of the farms are over 50 acres each. Much of the land has been reclaimed, turning the once mossy areas into very fertile ground when drained and cultivated. Barley is the main crop, and oats are also grown extensively, although the wheat acreage is small. Turnips and potatoes are the primary green crops, with turnips being the more important. Livestock raising is actively pursued, with the hilly terrain being well-suited for it, though many cattle graze in the lowland farms. The cattle are mostly a native breed that has been significantly improved through crossbreeding. The sheep population is high for the area. While most horses are used for farming, a notable number are kept solely for breeding. Tartans, plaids, and other wool products, along with linen, are produced in Kinross and Milnathort, which is also an important center for livestock sales. Brewing and milling also take place in the county town, but livestock farming and agriculture are the primary industries. The North British railway company’s lines run through the county from the south and west via Kinross, with the Mid-Fife line branching off at Mawcarse Junction.
Population and Government.—The population was 6673 in 1891 and 6981 in 1901, when 55 persons spoke Gaelic and English. The only towns are Kinross (pop. in 1901, 2136) and Milnathort (1052). Kinross is the county town, and of considerable antiquity. The county unites with Clackmannanshire to return one member to parliament. It forms a sheriffdom with Fifeshire and a sheriff-substitute sits at Kinross. The shire is under school-board jurisdiction.
Population and Government.—The population was 6,673 in 1891 and 6,981 in 1901, with 55 people speaking both Gaelic and English. The only towns are Kinross (population in 1901, 2,136) and Milnathort (1,052). Kinross is the county town and has a long history. The county combines with Clackmannanshire to elect one member to parliament. It shares a sheriffdom with Fifeshire, and a sheriff-substitute works in Kinross. The shire is under the jurisdiction of a school board.
History.—For several centuries the shire formed part of Fife, and during that period shared its history. Towards the middle of the 13th century, however, the parishes of Kinross and Orwell seem to have been constituted into a shire, which, at the date (1305) of Edward I.’s ordinance for the government of Scotland, had become an hereditary sheriffdom, John of Kinross then being named for the office. James I. dispensed with the attendance of small barons in 1427 and introduced the principle of representation, when the shire returned one member to the Scots parliament. The inclusion of the Fife parishes of Portmoak, Cleish and Tullibole in 1685, due to the influence of Sir William Bruce, the royal architect and heritable sheriff, converted the older shire into the modern county. Excepting, however, the dramatic and romantic episodes connected with the castle of Loch Leven, the annals of the shire, so far as the national story is concerned, are vacant. As to its antiquities, there are traces of an ancient fort or camp on the top of Dumglow, and on a hill on the northern boundary of the parish of Orwell a remarkable cairn, called Cairn-a-vain, in the centre of which a stone cist was discovered in 1810 containing an urn full of bones and charcoal. Close to the town of Kinross, on the margin of Loch Leven, stands Kinross House, which was built in 1685 by Sir William Bruce as a residence for the Duke of York (James II.) in case the Exclusion Bill should debar him from the throne of England. The mansion, however, was never occupied by royalty.
History.—For several centuries, the shire was part of Fife and shared its history. However, in the mid-13th century, the parishes of Kinross and Orwell were established as a shire, which by the time of Edward I’s ordinance for governing Scotland in 1305 had become an hereditary sheriffdom, with John of Kinross appointed to the position. In 1427, James I eliminated the need for small barons to attend and introduced a representation system, allowing the shire to elect one member to the Scots parliament. The addition of the Fife parishes of Portmoak, Cleish, and Tullibole in 1685, influenced by Sir William Bruce, the royal architect and hereditary sheriff, transformed the older shire into the modern county. Aside from the dramatic and romantic history of Loch Leven Castle, the shire’s records, in terms of national history, are sparse. Regarding its antiquities, there are remnants of an ancient fort or camp on the summit of Dumglow, and on a hill at the northern boundary of Orwell parish is a notable cairn called Cairn-a-vain, where a stone cist containing an urn with bones and charcoal was found in 1810. Near Kinross town, by the edge of Loch Leven, stands Kinross House, built in 1685 by Sir William Bruce as a residence for the Duke of York (James II.) in case the Exclusion Bill barred him from the English throne. However, the mansion was never used by royalty.
See Æ. J. G. Mackay, History of Fife and Kinross (Edinburgh, 1896); W. J. N. Liddall, The Place Names of Fife and Kinross (Edinburgh, 1895); C. Ross, Antiquities of Kinross-shire (Perth, 1886); R. B. Begg, History of Lochleven Castle (Kinross, 1887).
See Æ. J. G. Mackay, History of Fife and Kinross (Edinburgh, 1896); W. J. N. Liddall, The Place Names of Fife and Kinross (Edinburgh, 1895); C. Ross, Antiquities of Kinross-shire (Perth, 1886); R. B. Begg, History of Lochleven Castle (Kinross, 1887).

KINSALE, a market town and seaport of Co. Cork, Ireland, in the south-east parliamentary division, on the east shore of Kinsale Harbour (the estuary of the Bandon river) 24 m. south of Cork by the Cork Bandon & South Coast railway, the terminus of a branch line. Pop. of urban district (1901), 4250. The town occupies chiefly the acclivity of Compass Hill, and while of picturesque appearance is built in a very irregular manner, the streets being narrow and precipitous. The Charles Fort was completed by the duke of Ormonde in 1677 and captured by the earl of Marlborough in 1690. The parish church of St Multose is an ancient but inelegant structure, said to have been founded as a conventual church in the 12th century by the saint to whom it is dedicated. Kinsale, with the neighbouring villages of Scilly and Cove, is much frequented by summer visitors, and is the headquarters of the South of Ireland Fishing Company, with a fishery pier and a commodious harbour with 6 to 8 fathoms of water; but the general trade is of little importance owing to the proximity of Queenstown and Cork. The Old Head of Kinsale, at the west of the harbour entrance, affords fine views of the coast, and is commonly the first British land sighted by ships bound from New York, &c., to Queenstown.
KINSALE, is a market town and seaport in County Cork, Ireland, located in the southeast parliamentary division on the eastern shore of Kinsale Harbour (the estuary of the Bandon River). It's 24 miles south of Cork by the Cork Bandon & South Coast railway, which is the terminus of a branch line. The population of the urban district as of 1901 was 4,250. The town mainly sits on the slope of Compass Hill and, while it has a picturesque appearance, is built in a very irregular layout, with narrow and steep streets. Charles Fort was completed by the Duke of Ormonde in 1677 and taken by the Earl of Marlborough in 1690. The parish church of St. Multose is an old but unattractive building, believed to have been established as a convent church in the 12th century by the saint it honors. Kinsale, along with the nearby villages of Scilly and Cove, is a popular spot for summer visitors and is the headquarters of the South of Ireland Fishing Company, featuring a fishing pier and a spacious harbor with 6 to 8 fathoms of water; however, the overall trade is limited due to the proximity of Queenstown and Cork. The Old Head of Kinsale, located at the west entrance of the harbor, offers stunning views of the coast and is often the first British land sighted by ships coming from New York, etc., to Queenstown.
Kinsale is said to derive its name from cean taile, the headland in the sea. At an early period the town belonged to the De Courcys, a representative of whom was created baron of Kinsale or Kingsale in 1181. It received a charter of incorporation from Edward III., having previously been a borough by prescription, and its privileges were confirmed and extended by 825 various subsequent sovereigns. For several centuries previous to the Union it returned two members to the Irish parliament. It was the scene of an engagement between the French and English fleets in 1380, was forcibly entered by the English in 1488, captured by the Spaniards and retaken by the English in 1601, and entered by the English in 1641, who expelled the Irish inhabitants. Finally, it was the scene of the landing of James II. and of the French army sent to his assistance in 1689, and was taken by the English in the following year.
Kinsale is believed to get its name from cean taile, meaning the headland in the sea. Early on, the town was owned by the De Courcys, one of whom was made the baron of Kinsale or Kingsale in 1181. It got a charter of incorporation from Edward III and had previously been recognized as a borough by custom, with its rights confirmed and expanded by 825 various later monarchs. For several centuries before the Union, it sent two representatives to the Irish parliament. It was the site of a battle between the French and English fleets in 1380, was forcefully taken by the English in 1488, captured by the Spanish and then recaptured by the English in 1601, and occupied by the English in 1641, who drove out the Irish residents. Ultimately, it was where James II landed along with the French army sent to support him in 1689, and it was taken by the English the following year.

KINTORE, a royal and police burgh of Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Pop. (1901), 789. It is situated on the Don, 13¼ m. N.W. of Aberdeen by the Great North of Scotland railway. It is a place of some antiquity, having been made a royal burgh in the reign of William the Lion (d. 1214). Kintore forms one of the Elgin group of parliamentary burghs, the others being Banff, Cullen, Elgin, Inverurie and Peterhead. One mile to the south-west are the ruins of Hallforest Castle, of which two storeys still exist, once a hunting-seat of Robert Bruce and afterwards a residence of the Keiths, earls marischal. There are several examples of sculptured stones and circles in the parish, and 2 m. to the north-west is the site of Bruce’s camp, which is also ascribed to the period of the Romans. Near it is Thainston House, the residence of Sir Andrew Mitchell (1708-1771), the British envoy to Frederick the Great. Kintore gives the title of earl in the Scottish, and of baron in the British peerage to the head of the Keith-Falconer family.
KINTORE, a royal and police burgh in Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Pop. (1901), 789. It's located on the Don, 13¼ miles northwest of Aberdeen by the Great North of Scotland railway. It has a long history, having been established as a royal burgh during the reign of William the Lion (d. 1214). Kintore is part of the Elgin group of parliamentary burghs, which includes Banff, Cullen, Elgin, Inverurie, and Peterhead. One mile to the southwest are the ruins of Hallforest Castle, which still has two storeys and was once a hunting lodge for Robert Bruce and later a residence for the Keith family, earls marischal. There are several carved stones and circles in the parish, and 2 miles to the northwest is the site of Bruce’s camp, also believed to date back to the Roman period. Nearby is Thainston House, the home of Sir Andrew Mitchell (1708-1771), the British envoy to Frederick the Great. Kintore provides the title of earl in the Scottish peerage and baron in the British peerage to the head of the Keith-Falconer family.

KIOTO (Kyoto), the former capital of Japan, in the province of Yamashiro, in 35° 01′ N., 135° 46′ E. Pop. (1903), 379,404. The Kamo-gawa, upon which it stands, is a mere rivulet in ordinary times, trickling through a wide bed of pebbles; but the city is traversed by several aqueducts, and was connected with Lake Biwa in 1890 by a canal 67⁄8 m. long, which carries an abundance of water for manufacturing purposes, brings the great lake and the city into navigable communication, and forms with the Kamo-gawa canal and the Kamo-gawa itself a through route to Osaka, from which Kioto is 25 m. distant by rail. Founded in the year 793, Kioto remained the capital of the empire during nearly eleven centuries. The emperor Kwammu, when he selected this remarkably picturesque spot for the residence of his court, caused the city to be laid out with mathematical accuracy, after the model of the Tang dynasty’s capital in China. Its area, 3 m. by 3½, was intersected by 18 principal thoroughfares, 9 running due north and south, and 9 due east and west, the two systems being connected at intervals by minor streets. At the middle of the northern face stood the palace, its enclosure covering three-quarters of a square mile, and from it to the centre of the south face ran an avenue 283 ft. wide and 3½ m. long. Conflagrations and subsequent reconstructions modified the regularity of this plan, but much of it still remains, and its story is perpetuated in the nomenclature of the streets. In its days of greatest prosperity Kioto contained only half a million inhabitants, thus never even approximating to the size of the Tokugawa metropolis, Yedo, or the Hojo capital Kamakura. The emperor Kwammu called it Heian-jo, or the “city of peace,” when he made it the seat of government; but the people knew it as Miyako, or Kyoto, terms both of which signify “capital,” and in modern times it is often spoken of as Saikyo, or western capital, in opposition to Tokyo, or eastern capital. Having been so long the imperial, intellectual, political and artistic metropolis of the realm, the city abounds with evidences of its unique career. Magnificent temples and shrines, grand monuments of architectural and artistic skill, beautiful gardens, gorgeous festivals, and numerous ateliers where the traditions of Japanese art are obeyed with attractive results, offer to the foreign visitor a fund of interest. Clear water ripples everywhere through the city, and to this water Kioto owes something of its importance, for nowhere else in Japan can fabrics be bleached so white or dyed in such brilliant colours. The people, like their neighbours of Osaka, are full of manufacturing energy. Not only do they preserve, amid all the progress of the age, their old-time eminence as producers of the finest porcelain, faience, embroidery, brocades, bronze, cloisonné enamel, fans, toys and metal-work of all kinds, but they have also adapted themselves to the foreign market, and weave and dye quantities of silk fabrics, for which a large and constantly growing demand is found in Europe and America. Nowhere else can be traced with equal clearness the part played in Japanese civilization by Buddhism, with its magnificent paraphernalia and imposing ceremonial spectacles; nowhere else, side by side with this luxurious factor, can be witnessed in more striking juxtaposition the austere purity and severe simplicity of the Shinto cult; and nowhere else can be more intelligently observed the fine faculty of the Japanese for utilizing, emphasizing and enhancing the beauties of nature. The citizens’ dwellings and the shops, on the other hand, are insignificant and even sombre in appearance, their exterior conveying no idea of the pretty chambers within or of the tastefully laid-out grounds upon which they open behind. Kioto is celebrated equally for its cherry and azalea blossoms in the spring, and for the colours of its autumn foliage.
KIOTO (Kyoto), the former capital of Japan, located in Yamashiro province at 35° 01′ N., 135° 46′ E. Population (1903): 379,404. The Kamo-gawa, on which the city is built, is usually just a small stream that trickles through a wide bed of pebbles. However, the city is served by several aqueducts and was linked to Lake Biwa in 1890 by a 67/8 km canal, which supplies ample water for industry, connects the lake and the city for navigation, and creates a passage to Osaka, situated 25 km away by rail. Founded in 793, Kyoto was the capital of the empire for almost eleven centuries. Emperor Kwammu chose this stunning location for his court and had the city carefully designed based on the model of the Tang dynasty’s capital in China. Covering an area of 3 km by 3.5 km, Kyoto was laid out with 18 main roads, with 9 running north-south and 9 east-west, intersected by smaller streets. At the middle of the northern side stood the palace, which covered three-quarters of a square mile, leading to a wide avenue that was 283 ft. across and 3.5 km long extending to the center of the southern side. While fires and later reconstructions altered the original layout, much of it remains intact, and its history is reflected in the names of the streets. At its peak, Kyoto had only half a million residents, so it never reached the size of the Tokugawa capital, Yedo, or the Hojo capital, Kamakura. When Emperor Kwammu made it the seat of government, he called it Heian-jo, or "city of peace," though locals referred to it as Miyako or Kyoto, both terms for "capital." In modern times, it's known as Saikyo, or western capital, in contrast to Tokyo, the eastern capital. Having served as the imperial, intellectual, political, and artistic center of the realm for so long, the city showcases evidence of its rich history. It features magnificent temples and shrines, grand monuments of architecture and art, beautiful gardens, vibrant festivals, and many ateliers where traditional Japanese art is practiced with stunning results, providing foreign visitors with much to explore. Clear water flows throughout the city, contributing to its importance, as nowhere else in Japan can textiles be bleached so white or dyed in such vivid colors. Like their neighbors in Osaka, the people here are industrious. They maintain their historic reputation for producing fine porcelain, faience, embroidery, brocades, bronze, cloisonné enamel, fans, toys, and a variety of metalwork, while also successfully adapting to foreign markets by weaving and dyeing large quantities of silk fabrics, which are increasingly in demand in Europe and America. Nowhere else can one see so clearly the role of Buddhism in Japanese culture, complete with its magnificent ceremonies and elaborate rituals, alongside the austere simplicity of the Shinto religion, showcasing the Japanese talent for enhancing the beauty of nature. In contrast, the citizens’ homes and shops appear unremarkable and even gloomy, offering no hint of the lovely interiors or the tastefully designed gardens behind them. Kyoto is famous for its cherry and azalea blossoms in spring and the vibrant colors of its autumn leaves.

KIOWAS, a tribe and stock of North American Indians. Their former range was around the Arkansas and Canadian rivers, in Indian Territory (Oklahoma), Colorado and New Mexico. A fierce people, they made raids upon the settlers in western Texas until 1868, when they were placed on a reservation in Indian Territory. In 1874 they broke out again, but in the following year were finally subdued. In number about 1200, and settled in Oklahoma, they are the sole representatives of the Kiowan linguistic stock.
KIOWAS, a tribe and group of North American Indians. Their previous territory was around the Arkansas and Canadian rivers, in what is now Oklahoma, Colorado, and New Mexico. A fierce people, they raided settlers in western Texas until 1868, when they were put on a reservation in Oklahoma. In 1874 they rebelled again, but were ultimately subdued the following year. Now numbering about 1,200 and settled in Oklahoma, they are the only representatives of the Kiowan language family.
See J. Mooney, “Calendar History of the Kiowa Indians,” 17th Report of Bureau of American Ethnology (Washington, 1898).
See J. Mooney, “Calendar History of the Kiowa Indians,” 17th Report of Bureau of American Ethnology (Washington, 1898).

KIPLING, RUDYARD (1865- ), British author, was born in Bombay on the 30th of December 1865. His father, John Lockwood Kipling (1837-1911), an artist of considerable ability, was from 1875 to 1893 curator of the Lahore museum in India. His mother was Miss Alice Macdonald of Birmingham, two of whose sisters were married respectively to Sir E. Burne-Jones and Sir Edward Poynter. He was educated at the United Services College, Westward Ho, North Devon, of which a somewhat lurid account is given in his story Stalky and Co. On his return to India he became at the age of seventeen the sub-editor of the Lahore Civil and Military Gazette. In 1886, in his twenty-first year, he published Departmental Ditties, a volume of light verse chiefly satirical, only in two or three poems giving promise of his authentic poetical note. In 1887 he published Plain Tales from the Hills, a collection mainly of the stories contributed to his own journal. During the next two years he brought out, in six slim paper-covered volumes of Wheeler’s Railway Library (Allahabad), Soldiers Three, The Story of the Gadsbys, In Black and White, Under the Deodars, The Phantom ’Rickshaw and Wee Willie Winkee, at a rupee apiece. These were in form and substance a continuation of the Plain Tales. This series of tales, all written before the author was twenty-four, revealed a new master of fiction. A few, but those the best, he afterwards said that his father gave him. The rest were the harvest of his own powers of observation vitalized by imagination. In method they owed something to Bret Harte; in matter and spirit they were absolutely original. They were unequal, as his books continued to be throughout; the sketches of Anglo-Indian social life being generally inferior to the rest. The style was to some extent disfigured by jerkiness and mannered tricks. But Mr Kipling possessed the supreme spell of the story-teller to entrance and transport. The freshness of the invention, the variety of character, the vigour of narrative, the raciness of dialogue, the magic of atmosphere, were alike remarkable. The soldier-stories, especially the exuberant vitality of the cycle which contains the immortal Mulvaney, established the author’s fame throughout the world. The child-stories and tales of the British official were not less masterly, while the tales of native life and of adventure “beyond the pale” disclosed an even finer and deeper vein of romance. India, which had been an old story for generations of Englishmen, was revealed in these brilliant pictures as if seen for the first time in its variety, colour and passion, vivid as mirage, enchanting as the Arabian Nights. The new author’s talent was quickly 826 recognized in India, but it was not till the books reached England that his true rank was appreciated and proclaimed. Between 1887 and 1889 he travelled through India, China, Japan and America, finally arriving in England to find himself already famous. His travel sketches, contributed to The Civil and Military Gazette and The Pioneer, were afterwards collected (the author’s hand having been forced by unauthorized publication) in the two volumes From Sea to Sea (1899). A further set of Indian tales, equal to the best, appeared in Macmillan’s Magazine and were republished with others in Life’s Handicap (1891). In The Light that Failed (1891, after appearing with a different ending in Lippincott’s Magazine) Mr Kipling essayed his first long story (dramatized 1905), but with comparative unsuccess. In his subsequent work his delight in the display of descriptive and verbal technicalities grew on him. His polemic against “the sheltered life” and “little Englandism” became more didactic. His terseness sometimes degenerated into abruptness and obscurity. But in the meanwhile his genius became prominent in verse. Readers of the Plain Tales had been impressed by the snatches of poetry prefixed to them for motto, certain of them being subscribed “Barrack Room Ballad.” Mr Kipling now contributed to the National Observer, then edited by W. E. Henley, a series of Barrack Room Ballads. These vigorous verses in soldier slang, when published in a book in 1892, together with the fine ballad of “East and West” and other poems, won for their author a second fame, wider than he had attained as a story-teller. In this volume the Ballads of the “Bolivar” and of the “Clampherdown,” introducing Mr Kipling’s poetry of the ocean and the engine-room, and “The Flag of England,” finding a voice for the Imperial sentiment, which—largely under the influence of Mr Kipling’s own writings—had been rapidly gaining force in England, gave the key-note of much of his later verse. In 1898 Mr Kipling paid the first of several visits to South Africa and became imbued with a type of imperialism that reacted on his literature, not altogether to its advantage. Before finally settling in England Mr Kipling lived some years in America and married in 1892 Miss Caroline Starr Balestier, sister of the Wolcott Balestier to whom he dedicated Barrack Room Ballads, and with whom in collaboration he wrote the Naulahka (1891), one of his less successful books. The next collection of stories, Many Inventions (1893), contained the splendid Mulvaney extravaganza, “My Lord the Elephant”; a vividly realized tale of metempsychosis, “The Finest Story in the World”; and in that fascinating tale “In the Rukh,” the prelude to the next new exhibition of the author’s genius. This came in 1894 with The Jungle Book, followed in 1895 by The Second Jungle Book. With these inspired beast-stories Kipling conquered a new world and a new audience, and produced what many critics regard as his most flawless work. His chief subsequent publications were The Seven Seas (poems), 1896; Captains Courageous (a yarn of deep-sea fishery), 1897; The Day’s Work (collected stories), 1898; A Fleet in Being (an account of a cruise in a man-of-war), 1898; Stalky and Co. (mentioned above), 1899; From Sea to Sea (mentioned above), 1899; Kim, 1901; Just So Stories (for children), 1902; The Five Nations (poems, concluding with what proved Mr Kipling’s most universally known and popular poem, “Recessional,” originally published in The Times on the 17th of July 1897 on the occasion of Queen Victoria’s second jubilee), 1903; Traffics and Discoveries (collected stories), 1904; Puck of Pook’s Hill (stories), 1906; Actions and Reactions (stories), 1909. Of these Kim was notable as far the most successful of Mr Kipling’s longer narratives, though it is itself rather in the nature of a string of episodes. But everything he wrote, even to a farcical extravaganza inspired by his enthusiasm for the motor-car, breathed the meteoric energy that was the nature of the man. A vigorous and unconventional poet, a pioneer in the modern phase of literary Imperialism, and one of the rare masters in English prose of the art of the short story, Mr Kipling had already by the opening of the 20th century won the most conspicuous place among the creative literary forces of his day. His position in English literature was recognized in 1907 by the award to him of the Nobel prize.
KIPLING, RUDYARD (1865- ), British author, was born in Bombay on December 30, 1865. His father, John Lockwood Kipling (1837-1911), a talented artist, served as the curator of the Lahore museum in India from 1875 to 1893. His mother was Miss Alice Macdonald from Birmingham, with two of her sisters marrying Sir E. Burne-Jones and Sir Edward Poynter, respectively. He studied at the United Services College in Westward Ho, North Devon, which he depicted in a somewhat dramatic way in his story Stalky and Co. After returning to India, he became the sub-editor of the Lahore Civil and Military Gazette at the age of seventeen. In 1886, at twenty-one, he published Departmental Ditties, a collection of light, mainly satirical verses that hinted at his true poetic talent in a few of the poems. In 1887, he released Plain Tales from the Hills, primarily a collection of stories he contributed to his own journal. Over the next two years, he published six small paper-covered volumes in Wheeler’s Railway Library (Allahabad): Soldiers Three, The Story of the Gadsbys, In Black and White, Under the Deodars, The Phantom ’Rickshaw, and Wee Willie Winkee, each priced at a rupee. These works continued the themes of the Plain Tales. This series of stories, all written before he turned twenty-four, showcased a new master of fiction. He later noted that a few of the better ones were given to him by his father; the rest were drawn from his keen observations brought to life by his imagination. While the style showed some influence from Bret Harte, the content and spirit were entirely original. The tales varied in quality, with depictions of Anglo-Indian social life generally being weaker. His style occasionally suffered from abruptness and mannered quirks. Nonetheless, Kipling had a remarkable ability to engage and transport his audience. The originality of his storytelling, the diversity of characters, the dynamism of his narratives, the lively dialogue, and the captivating atmosphere were all notable. His soldier stories, especially the vibrant ones featuring the legendary Mulvaney, cemented his global reputation. His stories about children and British officials were equally impressive, while tales of native life and adventures “beyond the pale” revealed a profound and rich vein of romance. India, which had been a familiar tale for generations of Englishmen, was painted in his vibrant narratives as if seen for the first time—with its variety, colors, and passions as vivid as a mirage, enchanting like the Arabian Nights. Kipling's talent was quickly recognized in India, but it wasn’t until his work reached England that his true stature was acknowledged. Between 1887 and 1889, he traveled through India, China, Japan, and America, eventually arriving in England to find himself already famous. His travel writings, which he contributed to The Civil and Military Gazette and The Pioneer, were later compiled (the author's hand was forced by unauthorized publication) into two volumes titled From Sea to Sea (1899). Another set of Indian stories just as good was featured in Macmillan’s Magazine and republished with others in Life’s Handicap (1891). In The Light that Failed (1891, published with a different ending in Lippincott’s Magazine), Kipling attempted his first long story (adapted for the stage in 1905), but it was a relative failure. In his following works, his joy in showcasing descriptive and verbal techniques grew. His critique of “the sheltered life” and “little Englandism” became more instructional. His brief style occasionally shifted toward abruptness and obscurity. Meanwhile, his poetic genius began to shine. Readers of the Plain Tales had been captivated by the bits of poetry used as mottos, some signed as “Barrack Room Ballads.” Kipling later wrote a series of Barrack Room Ballads for the National Observer, then edited by W. E. Henley. These energetic verses in soldier slang, when published as a book in 1892 along with the powerful ballad “East and West” and other poems, earned him a second, even broader recognition than he achieved as a storyteller. This collection included the Ballads of the “Bolivar” and the “Clampherdown,” showcasing Kipling’s seafaring and engineering poetry, and “The Flag of England,” which gave voice to the rising Imperial sentiment in England—largely influenced by Kipling’s own writings. In 1898, he made his first of several trips to South Africa and absorbed a type of imperialism that affected his literature, not always positively. Before finally settling in England, Kipling lived in America for several years and married Miss Caroline Starr Balestier in 1892, the sister of Wolcott Balestier, to whom he dedicated Barrack Room Ballads, and with whom he co-wrote Naulahka (1891), one of his less successful works. His next collection of stories, Many Inventions (1893), included the magnificent Mulvaney adventure “My Lord the Elephant,” a vividly told tale of metempsychosis called “The Finest Story in the World,” and in the captivating story “In the Rukh,” the precursor to his next display of genius. This arrived in 1894 with The Jungle Book, followed by The Second Jungle Book in 1895. With these inspired animal stories, Kipling conquered a new realm and audience, creating what many critics consider his most perfect work. His major later publications included The Seven Seas (poems), 1896; Captains Courageous (a tale of deep-sea fishing), 1897; The Day’s Work (a collection of stories), 1898; A Fleet in Being (an account of a naval cruise), 1898; Stalky and Co. (mentioned above), 1899; From Sea to Sea (mentioned above), 1899; Kim, 1901; Just So Stories (for children), 1902; The Five Nations (poems, concluding with what became Kipling’s most universally recognized and popular poem, “Recessional,” first published in The Times on July 17, 1897, for Queen Victoria’s second jubilee), 1903; Traffics and Discoveries (collected stories), 1904; Puck of Pook’s Hill (stories), 1906; and Actions and Reactions (stories), 1909. Among these, Kim stood out as far the most successful of Kipling’s longer narratives, though it is more like a series of episodes. Nevertheless, everything he wrote, including a farcical extravaganza inspired by his enthusiasm for the motor-car, radiated the dynamic energy that characterized him. A vigorous and unconventional poet, a pioneer of the modern phase of literary imperialism, and one of the few masters in English prose of the short story, Kipling had already established a prominent place among the creative literary forces of his time by the dawn of the 20th century. His status in English literature was recognized in 1907 when he was awarded the Nobel Prize.
See Rudyard Kipling’s chapter in My First Book (Chatto, 1894); “A Bibliography of Rudyard Kipling,” by John Lane, in Rudyard Kipling: a Criticism, by Richard de Gallienne; “Mr Kipling’s Short Stories” in Questions at Issue, by Edmund Gosse (1893); “Mr Kipling’s Stories” in Essays in Little, by Andrew Lang; “Mr Kipling’s Stories,” by J. M. Barrie in the Contemporary Review (March 1891); articles in the Quarterly Review (July 1892) and Edinburgh Review (Jan. 1898); and section on Kipling in Poets of the Younger Generation, by William Archer (1902). See also for bibliography to 1903 English Illustrated Magazine, new series, vol. xxx. pp. 298 and 429-432.
See Rudyard Kipling’s chapter in My First Book (Chatto, 1894); “A Bibliography of Rudyard Kipling,” by John Lane, in Rudyard Kipling: a Criticism, by Richard de Gallienne; “Mr Kipling’s Short Stories” in Questions at Issue, by Edmund Gosse (1893); “Mr Kipling’s Stories” in Essays in Little, by Andrew Lang; “Mr Kipling’s Stories,” by J. M. Barrie in the Contemporary Review (March 1891); articles in the Quarterly Review (July 1892) and Edinburgh Review (Jan. 1898); and the section on Kipling in Poets of the Younger Generation, by William Archer (1902). Also see for bibliography up to 1903 English Illustrated Magazine, new series, vol. xxx. pp. 298 and 429-432.

KIPPER, properly the name by which the male salmon is known at some period of the breeding season. At the approach of this season the male fish develops a sharp cartilaginous beak, known as the “kip,” from which the name “kipper” is said to be derived. The earliest uses of the word (in Old English cypera and Middle English kypre) seem to include salmon of both sexes, and there is no certainty as to the etymology. Skeat derives it from the Old English kippian, “to spawn.” The term has been applied by various writers to salmon both during and after milting; early quotations leave the precise meaning of the word obscure, but generally refer to the unwholesomeness of the fish as food during the whole breeding season. It has been usually accepted, without much direct evidence, that from the practice of rendering the breeding (i.e. “kipper”) salmon fit for food by splitting, salting and smoke-drying them, the term “kipper” is also used of other fish, particularly herrings cured in the same way. The “bloater” as distinct from the “kipper” is a herring cured whole without being split open.
KIPPER, is the name used for male salmon during part of the breeding season. As this season approaches, the male fish develops a sharp cartilaginous beak called the “kip,” which is thought to be the origin of the term “kipper.” The earliest instances of the word (in Old English cypera and Middle English kypre) seem to refer to salmon of both sexes, and the origin of the term isn't entirely clear. Skeat suggests it comes from the Old English kippian, meaning “to spawn.” Various authors have used the term to describe salmon both during and after milting; early quotes make the exact meaning of the word unclear, but they generally indicate that the fish is not suitable to eat throughout the breeding season. It's widely accepted, with little direct evidence, that the practice of preparing breeding salmon (“kipper”) for consumption by splitting, salting, and smoking them led to the term being applied to other fish, particularly herrings treated in the same way. The “bloater,” on the other hand, is a whole herring that is cured without being split open.

KIPPIS, ANDREW (1725-1795), English nonconformist divine and biographer, son of Robert Kippis, a silk-hosier, was born at Nottingham on the 28th of March 1725. From school at Sleaford in Lincolnshire he passed at the age of sixteen to the nonconformist academy at Northampton, of which Dr Doddridge was then president. In 1746 Kippis became minister of a church at Boston; in 1750 he removed to Dorking in Surrey; and in 1753 he became pastor of a Presbyterian congregation at Westminster, where he remained till his death on the 8th of October 1795. Kippis took a prominent part in the affairs of his church. From 1763 till 1784 he was classical and philological tutor in Coward’s training college at Hoxton; and subsequently for some years at another institution of the same kind at Hackney. In 1778 he was elected a fellow of the Antiquarian Society, and a fellow of the Royal Society in 1779.
Kippis, Andrew (1725-1795) was an English nonconformist minister and biographer. He was born to Robert Kippis, a silk merchant, in Nottingham on March 28, 1725. After attending school in Sleaford, Lincolnshire, he moved to the nonconformist academy in Northampton at the age of sixteen, where Dr. Doddridge was the president. In 1746, Kippis became the minister of a church in Boston; in 1750, he moved to Dorking, Surrey; and in 1753, he became the pastor of a Presbyterian congregation in Westminster, where he served until his death on October 8, 1795. Kippis played an active role in church matters. From 1763 to 1784, he was a classical and philological tutor at Coward’s training college in Hoxton and then spent several years at another similar institution in Hackney. In 1778, he was elected a fellow of the Antiquarian Society and became a fellow of the Royal Society in 1779.
Kippis was a very voluminous writer. He contributed largely to The Gentleman’s Magazine, The Monthly Review and The Library; and he had a good deal to do with the establishment and conduct of The New Annual Register. He published also a number of sermons and occasional pamphlets; and he prefixed a life of the author to a collected edition of Dr Nathaniel Lardner’s Works (1788). He wrote a life of Dr Doddridge, which is prefixed to Doddridge’s Exposition of the New Testament (1792). His chief work is his edition of the Biographia Britannica, of which, however, he only lived to publish 5 vols. (folio, 1778-1793). In this work he had the assistance of Dr Towers. See notice by A. Rees, D.D., in The New Annual Register for 1795.
Kippis was a very prolific writer. He contributed significantly to The Gentleman’s Magazine, The Monthly Review, and The Library; and he played a major role in starting and managing The New Annual Register. He also published several sermons and occasional pamphlets; and he wrote a biography of the author that prefaced a collected edition of Dr. Nathaniel Lardner’s Works (1788). He penned a biography of Dr. Doddridge, which is included at the beginning of Doddridge’s Exposition of the New Testament (1792). His major work is his edition of the Biographia Britannica, of which he was only able to publish 5 volumes (folio, 1778-1793). He received help from Dr. Towers for this work. See the notice by A. Rees, D.D., in The New Annual Register for 1795.

KIRBY, WILLIAM (1759-1850), English entomologist, was born at Witnesham in Suffolk on the 19th of September 1759. From the village school of Witnesham he passed to Ipswich grammar school, and thence to Caius College, Cambridge, where he graduated in 1781. Taking holy orders in 1782, he spent his entire life in the peaceful seclusion of an English country parsonage at Barham in Suffolk. His favourite study was natural history; and eventually entomology engrossed all his leisure. His first work of importance was his Monographia Apum Angliae (2 vols. 8vo, 1802), which as the first scientific treatise on its subject brought him into notice with the leading entomologists of his own and foreign countries. The practical result of a friendship formed in 1805 with William Spence, of Hull, was the jointly written Introduction to Entomology (4 vols., 1815-1826; 7th ed., 1856), one of the most popular books of science that have ever appeared. In 1830 he was chosen to write one of the Bridgewater Treatises, his subject being The History, Habits, and Instincts of Animals (2 vols., 1835). This undeniably fell short of his earlier works in point of scientific value. He died on the 4th of July 1850.
KIRBY, WILLIAM (1759-1850), an English entomologist, was born in Witnesham, Suffolk, on September 19, 1759. He attended the local village school in Witnesham, then moved on to Ipswich Grammar School, and later to Caius College, Cambridge, where he graduated in 1781. After taking holy orders in 1782, he spent his life in the quiet solitude of an English country parsonage in Barham, Suffolk. His main interest was natural history, and over time, entomology became his passion. His first significant work was the Monographia Apum Angliae (2 vols. 8vo, 1802), which, as the first scientific treatise on the topic, brought him recognition among leading entomologists in both his country and abroad. A friendship formed in 1805 with William Spence from Hull led to their joint work, Introduction to Entomology (4 vols., 1815-1826; 7th ed., 1856), which became one of the most popular science books ever published. In 1830, he was selected to write one of the Bridgewater Treatises, focusing on The History, Habits, and Instincts of Animals (2 vols., 1835). This work, however, did not match his earlier publications in scientific merit. He passed away on July 4, 1850.
Besides the books already mentioned he was the author of many papers in the Transactions of the Linnean Society, the Zoological Journal and other periodicals; Strictures on Sir James Smith’s Hypothesis respecting the Lilies of the Field of our Saviour and the Acanthus of Virgil (1819); Seven Sermons on our Lord’s Temptations (1829); and he wrote the sections on insects in the Account of the Animals seen by the late Northern Expedition while within the Arctic Circle (1821), and in Fauna Boreali-Americana (1837). His Life by the Rev. John Freeman, published in 1852, contains a list of his works.
Besides the books already mentioned, he wrote many papers in the Transactions of the Linnean Society, the Zoological Journal, and other periodicals; Strictures on Sir James Smith’s Hypothesis Regarding the Lilies of the Field of Our Savior and the Acanthus of Virgil (1819); Seven Sermons on Our Lord’s Temptations (1829); and he contributed the sections on insects in the Account of the Animals Seen by the Late Northern Expedition While Within the Arctic Circle (1821) and in Fauna Boreali-Americana (1837). His Life by the Rev. John Freeman, published in 1852, has a list of his works.

KIRCHER, ATHANASIUS (1601-1680), German scholar and mathematician, was born on the 2nd of May 1601, at Geisa near Fulda. He was educated at the Jesuit college of Fulda, and entered upon his noviciate in that order at Mainz in 1618. He became professor of philosophy, mathematics, and Oriental languages at Würzburg, whence he was driven (1631) by the troubles of the Thirty Years’ War to Avignon. Through the influence of Cardinal Barberini he next (1635) settled in Rome, where for eight years he taught mathematics in the Collegio Romano, but ultimately resigned this appointment to study hieroglyphics and other archaeological subjects. He died on the 28th of November 1680.
KIRCHER, ATHANASIUS (1601-1680), a German scholar and mathematician, was born on May 2, 1601, in Geisa near Fulda. He was educated at the Jesuit college in Fulda and joined the Jesuit order in Mainz in 1618. He became a professor of philosophy, mathematics, and Oriental languages at Würzburg, but was forced to leave in 1631 due to the conflicts of the Thirty Years’ War and moved to Avignon. With the support of Cardinal Barberini, he settled in Rome in 1635, where he taught mathematics at the Collegio Romano for eight years before resigning to pursue studies in hieroglyphics and other archaeological subjects. He passed away on November 28, 1680.
Kircher was a man of wide and varied learning, but singularly devoid of judgment and critical discernment. His voluminous writings in philology, natural history, physics and mathematics often accordingly have a good deal of the historical interest which attaches to pioneering work, however imperfectly performed; otherwise they now take rank as curiosities of literature merely. They include Ars Magnesia (1631); Magnes, sive de arte magnetica opus tripartitum (1641); and Magneticum naturae regnum (1667); Prodromus Coptus (1636); Lingua Aegyptiaca restituta (1643); Obeliscus Pamphilius (1650); and Oedipus Aegyptiacus, hoc est universalis doctrinae hieroglyphicae instauratio (1652-1655)—works which may claim the merit of having first called attention to Egyptian hieroglyphics; Ars magna lucis et umbrae in mundo (1645-1646); Musurgia universalis, sive ars magna consoni et dissoni (1650); Polygraphia, seu artificium linguarum quo cum omnibus mundi populis poterit quis respondere (1663); Mundus subterraneus, quo subterrestris mundi opificium, universae denique naturae divitiae, abditorum effectuum causae demonstrantur (1665-1678); China illustrata (1667); Ars magna sciendi (1669); and Latium (1669), a work which may still be consulted with advantage. The Specula Melitensis Encyclica (1638) gives an account of a kind of calculating machine of his invention. The valuable collection of antiquities which he bequeathed to the Collegio Romano has been described by Buonanni (Musaeum Kircherianum, 1709; republished by Battara in 1773).
Kircher was a man of broad and diverse knowledge, but he lacked sound judgment and critical thinking. His extensive writings in fields like philology, natural history, physics, and mathematics often carry the historical interest that comes with pioneering efforts, even if they were not executed flawlessly; otherwise, they are now primarily regarded as literary curiosities. His works include Ars Magnesia (1631); Magnes, sive de arte magnetica opus tripartitum (1641); and Magneticum naturae regnum (1667); Prodromus Coptus (1636); Lingua Aegyptiaca restituta (1643); Obeliscus Pamphilius (1650); and Oedipus Aegyptiacus, hoc est universalis doctrinae hieroglyphicae instauratio (1652-1655)—works that are notable for being the first to draw attention to Egyptian hieroglyphics; Ars magna lucis et umbrae in mundo (1645-1646); Musurgia universalis, sive ars magna consoni et dissoni (1650); Polygraphia, seu artificium linguarum quo cum omnibus mundi populis poterit quis respondere (1663); Mundus subterraneus, quo subterrestris mundi opificium, universae denique naturae divitiae, abditorum effectuum causae demonstrantur (1665-1678); China illustrata (1667); Ars magna sciendi (1669); and Latium (1669), a work that can still be useful for reference today. The Specula Melitensis Encyclica (1638) provides a description of a calculating machine he invented. The valuable collection of antiquities he left to the Collegio Romano was described by Buonanni (Musaeum Kircherianum, 1709; republished by Battara in 1773).

KIRCHHEIM-UNTER-TECK, a town of Germany, in the kingdom of Württemberg, is prettily situated on the Lauter, at the north-west foot of the Rauhe Alb, 15 m. S.E. of Stuttgart by rail. Pop. (1905), 8830. The town has a royal castle built in 1538, two schools and several benevolent institutions. The manufactures include cotton goods, damask, pianofortes, machinery, furniture, chemicals and cement. The town also has wool-spinning establishments and breweries, and a corn exchange. It is the most important wool market in South Germany, and has also a trade in fruit, timber and pigs. In the vicinity are the ruins of the castle of Teck, the hereditary stronghold of the dukes of that name. Kirchheim has belonged to Württemberg since 1381.
KIRCHHEIM-UNTER-TECK, is a town in Germany, located in the kingdom of Württemberg. It's beautifully positioned on the Lauter River, at the northwest foot of the Rauhe Alb, about 15 miles southeast of Stuttgart by train. Population (1905) was 8,830. The town features a royal castle built in 1538, two schools, and several charitable institutions. Its industries produce cotton goods, damask, pianos, machinery, furniture, chemicals, and cement. Kirchheim also has wool-spinning factories, breweries, and a grain exchange. It’s the most significant wool market in southern Germany and trades in fruit, timber, and pigs. Nearby are the ruins of the castle of Teck, the ancestral stronghold of the dukes of that name. Kirchheim has been part of Württemberg since 1381.

KIRCHHOFF, GUSTAV ROBERT (1824-1887), German physicist, was born at Königsberg (Prussia) on the 12th of March 1824, and was educated at the university of his native town, where he graduated Ph.D. in 1847. After acting as privat-docent at Berlin for some time, he became extraordinary professor of physics at Breslau in 1850. Four years later he was appointed professor of physics at Heidelberg, and in 1875 he was transferred to Berlin, where he died on the 17th of October 1887. Kirchhoff’s contributions to mathematical physics were numerous and important, his strength lying in his powers of stating a new physical problem in terms of mathematics, not merely in working out the solution after it had been so formulated. A number of his papers were concerned with electrical questions. One of the earliest was devoted to electrical conduction in a thin plate, and especially in a circular one, and it also contained a theorem which enables the distribution of currents in a network of conductors to be ascertained. Another discussed conduction in curved sheets; a third the distribution of electricity in two influencing spheres; a fourth the determination of the constant on which depends the intensity of induced currents; while others were devoted to Ohm’s law, the motion of electricity in submarine cables, induced magnetism, &c. In other papers, again, various miscellaneous topics were treated—the thermal conductivity of iron, crystalline reflection and refraction, certain propositions in the thermodynamics of solution and vaporization, &c. An important part of his work was contained in his Vorlesungen über mathematische Physik (1876), in which the principles of dynamics, as well as various special problems, were treated in a somewhat novel and original manner. But his name is best known for the researches, experimental and mathematical, in radiation which led him, in company with R. W. von Bunsen, to the development of spectrum analysis as a complete system in 1859-1860. He can scarcely be called its inventor, for not only had many investigators already used the prism as an instrument of chemical inquiry, but considerable progress had been made towards the explanation of the principles upon which spectrum analysis rests. But to him belongs the merit of having, most probably without knowing what had already been done, enunciated a complete account of its theory, and of thus having firmly established it as a means by which the chemical constituents of celestial bodies can be discovered through the comparison of their spectra with those of the various elements that exist on this earth.
KIRCHHOFF, GUSTAV ROBERT (1824-1887), a German physicist, was born in Königsberg (Prussia) on March 12, 1824, and studied at the university in his hometown, where he earned his Ph.D. in 1847. After serving as a privat-docent in Berlin for a while, he became an extraordinary professor of physics at Breslau in 1850. Four years later, he was appointed professor of physics at Heidelberg, and in 1875 he moved to Berlin, where he passed away on October 17, 1887. Kirchhoff made numerous significant contributions to mathematical physics, excelling in the ability to present a new physical problem in mathematical terms rather than just working out the solution once it was defined. Many of his papers focused on electrical issues. One of his earliest works dealt with electrical conduction in thin plates, especially circular ones, and included a theorem that allows for determining the distribution of currents in a network of conductors. Another paper examined conduction in curved sheets; a third addressed the distribution of electricity in two influencing spheres; a fourth outlined the constant that determines the intensity of induced currents; while others focused on Ohm’s law, the flow of electricity in submarine cables, induced magnetism, and more. He also wrote on various other topics, including the thermal conductivity of iron, crystalline reflection and refraction, and specific propositions in the thermodynamics of solution and vaporization. An important part of his work was in his Vorlesungen über mathematische Physik (1876), where he discussed the principles of dynamics and various specific problems in a somewhat original way. However, he is best known for his experimental and mathematical research in radiation, which he conducted alongside R. W. von Bunsen, leading to the development of spectrum analysis as a complete system in 1859-1860. While he cannot be considered its inventor—since many researchers had already used prisms as tools for chemical investigation and significant progress was made in understanding the principles behind spectrum analysis—Kirchhoff deserves credit for articulating a comprehensive theory that likely built upon previous work, thereby firmly establishing it as a method for discovering the chemical components of celestial bodies by comparing their spectra to those of various elements found on Earth.

KIRCHHOFF, JOHANN WILHELM ADOLF (1826-1908), German classical scholar and epigraphist, was born in Berlin on the 6th of January 1826. In 1865 he was appointed professor of classical philology in the university of his native city. He died on the 26th of February 1908. He is the author of Die Homerische Odyssee (1859), putting forward an entirely new theory as to the composition of the Odyssey; editions of Plotinus (1856), Euripides (1855 and 1877-1878). Aeschylus (1880), Hesiod (Works and Days, 1889), Xenophon, On the Athenian Constitution (3rd ed., 1889); Über die Entstehungszeit des Herodotischen Geschichtswerkes (2nd ed., 1878); Thukydides und sein Urkundenmaterial (1895).
KIRCHHOFF, JOHANN WILHELM ADOLF (1826-1908), a German classical scholar and epigraphist, was born in Berlin on January 6, 1826. In 1865, he became a professor of classical philology at the university in his hometown. He passed away on February 26, 1908. He authored Die Homerische Odyssee (1859), presenting a completely new theory about the composition of the Odyssey; edited works of Plotinus (1856), Euripides (1855 and 1877-1878), Aeschylus (1880), and Hesiod (Works and Days, 1889), along with Xenophon’s On the Athenian Constitution (3rd ed., 1889); Über die Entstehungszeit des Herodotischen Geschichtswerkes (2nd ed., 1878); and Thukydides und sein Urkundenmaterial (1895).
The following works are the result of his epigraphical and palaeographical studies: Die Umbrischen Sprachdenkmäler (1851); Das Stadlrecht von Bantia (1853), on the tablet discovered in 1790 at Oppido near Banzi, containing a plebiscite relating to the municipal affairs of the ancient Bantia; Das Gotische Runenalphabet (1852); Die Fränkischen Runen (1855); Studien zur Geschichte des Griechischen Alphabets (4th ed., 1887). The second part of vol. iv. of the Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum (1859, containing the Christian inscriptions) and vol. i. of the C. I. Atticarum (1873, containing the inscriptions before 403) with supplements thereto (vol. iv. pts. 1-3, 1877-1891) are edited by him.
The following works are the result of his studies in epigraphy and paleography: Die Umbrischen Sprachdenkmäler (1851); Das Stadlrecht von Bantia (1853), about the tablet found in 1790 at Oppido near Banzi, which contains a plebiscite regarding the municipal affairs of the ancient Bantia; Das Gotische Runenalphabet (1852); Die Fränkischen Runen (1855); Studien zur Geschichte des Griechischen Alphabets (4th ed., 1887). He also edited the second part of vol. iv. of the Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum (1859, which includes the Christian inscriptions) and vol. i. of the C. I. Atticarum (1873, containing the inscriptions before 403) along with supplements (vol. iv. pts. 1-3, 1877-1891).

KIRGHIZ, a large and widespread division of the Turkish family, of which there are two main branches, the Kara-Kirghiz of the uplands and the Kirghiz-Kazaks of the steppe. They jointly number about 3,000,000, and occupy an area of perhaps the same number of square miles, stretching from Kulja westwards to the lower Volga, and from the headstreams of the Ob southwards to the Pamir and the Turkoman country. They seem closely allied ethnically to the Mongolians and in speech to the Tatars. But both Mongols and Tatars belonged themselves originally to one racial stock and formed part of the same hordes or nomadic armies: also the Western Turks have to a large extent lost their original physique and become largely assimilated to the regular “Caucasian” type. But the Kirghiz have either remained nearly altogether unmixed, as in the uplands, or else have intermingled in the steppe mainly with the Volga Kalmucks in the west, and with the Dzungarian nomads in the east, all alike of Mongol stock. Hence they have everywhere to a large extent preserved the common Mongolian features, while retaining their primitive Tatar speech. Physically they are a middle-sized, square-built race, inclined to stoutness, especially in the steppe, mostly with long black hair, scant beard or none, small, black and oblique eyes, though blue or grey also occur in the south, broad Mongoloid features, high cheekbones, broad, flat nose, small mouth, brachycephalous head, very small hands and feet, dirty brown or swarthy complexion, 828 often yellowish, but also occasionally fair. These characteristics, while affiliating them directly to the Mongol stock, also betray an admixture of foreign elements, probably due to Finnish influences in the north, and Tajik or Iranian blood in the south. Their speech also, while purely Turkic in structure, possesses, not only many Mongolian and a few Persian and even Arabic words, but also some terms unknown to the other branches of the Mongolo-Tatar linguistic family, and which should perhaps be traced to the Kiang-Kuan, Wu-sun, Ting-ling, and other peoples of South Siberia partly absorbed by them.
Kyrgyz, is a large and widespread group within the Turkish family, with two main branches: the Kara-Kirghiz from the uplands and the Kirghiz-Kazaks from the steppe. Together, they number around 3,000,000 and cover an area of roughly the same number of square miles, extending from Kulja to the lower Volga and from the headwaters of the Ob to the Pamir and Turkoman regions. They appear to be closely related to the Mongolians and linguistically to the Tatars. Mongols and Tatars originally shared a common ethnic background and were part of the same nomadic groups or armies. Likewise, many Western Turks have lost their original physical traits and largely blended into the typical “Caucasian” type. However, the Kirghiz have mostly remained pure, especially in the uplands, or have intermingled primarily with the Volga Kalmucks in the west and the Dzungarian nomads in the east, all of which are of Mongol descent. Because of this, they have largely retained typical Mongolian features while keeping their original Tatar language. Physically, they are medium-sized, robust individuals, often stout—particularly in the steppe—with long black hair, sparse or no beard, small, black, slanted eyes, although blue or grey ones are found in the south, broad Mongoloid features, high cheekbones, a wide, flat nose, a small mouth, a round head, very small hands and feet, and a complexion that is usually a dirty brown or swarthy, sometimes yellowish but occasionally fair. These traits not only connect them to the Mongol lineage but also suggest an intermingling with other ethnic groups, likely influenced by Finnish backgrounds in the north and Tajik or Iranian ancestry in the south. Their language, while purely Turkic in structure, contains numerous Mongolian words, a few Persian and Arabic terms, and some words not found in other branches of the Mongolo-Tatar language family, likely derived from the Kiang-Kuan, Wu-sun, Ting-ling, and other populations of South Siberia that they partially absorbed. 828
The Kara-Kirghiz.—The Kara or “Black” Kirghiz, so called from the colour of their tents, are known to the Russians either as Chernyie (Black) or Dikokammenyie (Wild Stone or Rocky) Kirghiz, and are the Block Kirghiz of some English writers. They are on the whole the purest and best representatives of the race, and properly speaking to them alone belongs the distinctive national name Kirghiz or Krghiz. This term is commonly traced to a legendary chief, Kirghiz, sprung of Oghuz-Khan, ninth in descent from Japheth. It occurs in its present form for the first time in the account of the embassy sent in 569 by the East Roman emperor Justin II. to the Uighur Khan, Dugla-Ditubulu, where it is stated that this prince presented a slave of the Kirghiz tribe to Zemark, head of the mission. In the Chinese chronicles the word assumes the form Ki-li-ki-tz’, and the writers of the Yuan dynasty (1280-1367) place the territory of these people 10,000 li north-west of Pekin, about the headstreams of the Yenisei. In the records of the T’ang dynasty (618-907) they are spoken of under the name of Kha-kia-tz’ (pronounced Khaka, and sometimes transliterated Haka), and it is mentioned that these Khakas were of the same speech as the Khoei-khu. From this it follows that they were of Mongolo-Tatar stock, and are wrongly identified by some ethnologists with the Kiang-Kuan, Wu-sun, or Ting-ling, all of whom are described as tall, with red hair, “green” or grey eyes, and fair complexion, and must therefore have been of Finnish stock, akin to the present Soyotes of the upper Yenisei.
The Kara-Kirghiz.—The Kara or “Black” Kirghiz, named for the color of their tents, are referred to by Russians as Chernyie (Black) or Dikokammenyie (Wild Stone or Rocky) Kirghiz, and are also known as the Block Kirghiz by some English writers. Overall, they are the purest and best representatives of the race, and the distinctive national name Kirghiz or Krghiz properly belongs to them alone. This term is often traced back to a legendary chief, Kirghiz, who is descended from Oghuz-Khan, ninth in line from Japheth. The term appears in its current form for the first time in the account of an embassy sent in 569 by the East Roman emperor Justin II to the Uighur Khan, Dugla-Ditubulu, where it states that this prince presented a slave from the Kirghiz tribe to Zemark, the head of the mission. In Chinese chronicles, the word appears as Ki-li-ki-tz’, and writers from the Yuan dynasty (1280-1367) place the territory of these people 10,000 li northwest of Beijing, near the headwaters of the Yenisei. In records from the T’ang dynasty (618-907), they are referred to as Kha-kia-tz’ (pronounced Khaka, and sometimes transliterated as Haka), and it is noted that these Khakas spoke the same language as the Khoei-khu. This indicates they were of Mongolo-Tatar origin, and some ethnologists incorrectly identify them with the Kiang-Kuan, Wu-sun, or Ting-ling, all of whom are described as tall, with red hair, “green” or gray eyes, and fair complexion, suggesting they were of Finnish descent, related to the current Soyotes of the upper Yenisei.
The Kara-Kirghiz are by the Chinese and Mongolians called Burut, where ut is the Mongolian plural ending, as in Tangut, Yakut, modified to yat in Buryat, the collective name of the Siberian Mongolians of the Baikal district. Thus the term Bur is the common Mongolian designation both of the Baikal Mongols and of the Kara-Kirghiz, who occupied this very region and the upper Yenisei valley generally till comparatively recent times. For the original home of their ancestors, the Khakas, lay in the south of the present governments of Yeniseisk and Tomsk, stretching thence southwards beyond the Sayan range to the Tannuola hills in Chinese territory. Here the Russians first met them in the 17th century, and by the aid of the Kazaks exterminated all those east of the Irtish, driving the rest farther west and south-westwards. Most of them took refuge with their kinsmen, the Kara-Kirghiz nomad highlanders, whose homes, at least since the 13th century, have been the Ala-tau range, the Issyk-kul basin, the Tekes, Chu and Talass river valleys, the Tian-shan range, the uplands draining both to the Tarim and to the Jaxartes and Oxus, including Khokand, Karateghin and Shignan southwards to the Pamir table-land, visited by them in summer. They thus occupy most of the uplands along the Russo-Chinese frontier, between 35° and 50° N. lat. and between 70° and 85° E. long.
The Kara-Kirghiz are referred to as Burut by the Chinese and Mongolians, with ut being the Mongolian plural ending, similar to Tangut and Yakut, and modified to yat in Buryat, which is a collective name for the Siberian Mongolians in the Baikal area. The term Bur is therefore the common Mongolian term for both the Baikal Mongols and the Kara-Kirghiz, who lived in this region and the upper Yenisei valley until relatively recently. The original homeland of their ancestors, the Khakas, was in the southern part of what is now the Yeniseisk and Tomsk regions, extending southward beyond the Sayan mountains to the Tannuola hills in Chinese territory. The Russians first encountered them in the 17th century and, with the help of the Kazaks, exterminated all those east of the Irtysh River, pushing the remaining population further west and southwest. Most of them sought refuge with their relatives, the Kara-Kirghiz nomadic highlanders, who have lived in the Ala-tau range, the Issyk-kul basin, the Tekes, Chu and Talass river valleys, the Tian-shan range, and the uplands draining toward both the Tarim and the Jaxartes and Oxus rivers, including Khokand, Karateghin, and Shignan down to the Pamir plateau, which they visit in the summer. They therefore inhabit most of the highlands along the Russo-Chinese border, between 35° and 50° N latitude and between 70° and 85° E longitude.
The Kara-Kirghiz are all grouped in two main sections—the On or “Right” in the east, with seven branches (Bogu, Sary-Bagishch, Son-Bagishch, Sultu or Solye, Cherik, Sayak, Bassinz), and the Sol or “Left” in the west, with four branches (Kokche or Kûchy, Soru, Mundus, Kitai or Kintai). The Sol section occupies the region between the Talass and Oxus headstreams in Ferghana (Khokand) and Bokhara, where they come in contact with the Galchas or Highland Tajiks. The On section lies on both sides of the Tian-shan, about Lake Issyk-kul, and in the Chu, Tekes and Narin (upper Jaxartes) valleys.
The Kara-Kirghiz are divided into two main groups—the On or “Right” in the east, which has seven branches (Bogu, Sary-Bagishch, Son-Bagishch, Sultu or Solye, Cherik, Sayak, Bassinz), and the Sol or “Left” in the west, which has four branches (Kokche or Kûchy, Soru, Mundus, Kitai or Kintai). The Sol group is located in the area between the Talass and Oxus headstreams in Ferghana (Khokand) and Bokhara, where they interact with the Galchas or Highland Tajiks. The On group is found on both sides of the Tian-shan, around Lake Issyk-kul, and in the Chu, Tekes, and Narin (upper Jaxartes) valleys.
The total number of Kara-Kirghiz exceeds 800,000.
The total number of Kara-Kirghiz is over 800,000.
All are essentially nomads, occupied mainly with stock breeding, chiefly horses of a small but hardy breed, sheep of the fat-tailed species, oxen used both for riding and as pack animals, some goats, and camels of both species. Agriculture is limited chiefly to the cultivation of wheat, barley and millet, from the last of which a coarse vodka or brandy is distilled. Trade is carried on chiefly by barter, cattle being taken by the dealers from China, Turkestan and Russia in exchange for manufactured goods.
All of them are basically nomads, primarily focused on raising livestock, especially a small but tough breed of horses, fat-tailed sheep, oxen used for riding and carrying loads, some goats, and both types of camels. Farming is mainly limited to growing wheat, barley, and millet, from which a rough vodka or brandy is made. Trade is mostly done through bartering, with dealers bringing cattle from China, Turkestan, and Russia in exchange for manufactured goods.
The Kara-Kirghiz are governed by the “manaps,” or tribal rulers, who enjoy almost unlimited authority, and may even sell or kill their subjects. In religious matters they differ little from the Kazaks, whose practices are described below. Although generally recognizing Russian sovereignty since 1864, they pay no taxes.
The Kara-Kirghiz are ruled by the “manaps,” or tribal leaders, who have nearly unlimited power and can even sell or kill their subjects. In terms of religion, they are quite similar to the Kazaks, whose practices are discussed below. Although they have generally acknowledged Russian sovereignty since 1864, they do not pay any taxes.
The Kazaks.—Though not unknown to them, the term Kirghiz is never used by the steppe nomads, who always call themselves simply Kazaks, commonly interpreted as riders. The first authentic reference to this name is by the Persian poet and historian Firdousi (1020), who speaks of the Kazak tribes as much dreaded steppe marauders, all mounted and armed with lances. From this circumstance the term Kazak came to be gradually applied to all freebooters similarly equipped, and it thus spread from the Aralo-Caspian basin to South Russia, where it still survives under the form of Cossack, spelt Kazak or Kozak in Russian. Hence though Kazak and Cossack are originally the same word, the former now designates a Mongolo-Tatar nomad race, the latter various members of the Slav family. Since the 18th century the Russians have used the compound expression Kirghiz-Kazak, chiefly in order to distinguish them from their own Cossacks, at that time overrunning Siberia. Siegmund Herberstein (1486-1566) is the first European who mentions them by name, and it is noteworthy that he speaks of them as “Tartars,” that is, a people rather of Turki than Mongolian stock.
The Kazaks.—Although they are somewhat familiar with the term Kirghiz, the steppe nomads never use it and simply call themselves Kazaks, which is often interpreted as riders. The first genuine mention of this name comes from the Persian poet and historian Firdousi (1020), who describes the Kazak tribes as feared steppe raiders, all mounted and armed with lances. Because of this, the term Kazak gradually began to refer to all similarly equipped freebooters, spreading from the Aralo-Caspian basin to South Russia, where it still exists in the form of Cossack, spelled Kazak or Kozak in Russian. Thus, while Kazak and Cossack originally refer to the same term, the former now indicates a Mongolo-Tatar nomadic group, while the latter denotes various members of the Slavic family. Since the 18th century, Russians have used the term Kirghiz-Kazak, mainly to differentiate them from their own Cossacks, who were expanding into Siberia at that time. Siegmund Herberstein (1486-1566) is the first European to mention them by name, and it is interesting to note that he describes them as “Tartars,” referring to a people more of Turki than Mongolian origin.
In their present homes, the so-called “Kirghiz steppes,” they are far more numerous and widespread than their Kara-Kirghiz kinsmen, stretching almost uninterruptedly from Lake Balkash round the Aral and Caspian Seas westwards to the lower Volga, and from the river Irtish southwards to the lower Oxus and Ust-Urt plateau. Their domain, which is nearly 2,000,000 sq. m. in extent, thus lies mainly between 45° and 55° N. lat. and from 45° to 80° E. long. Here they came under the sway of Jenghiz Khan, after whose death they fell to the share of his son Juji, head of the Golden Horde, but continued to retain their own khans. When the Uzbegs acquired the ascendancy, many of the former subjects of the Juji and Jagatai hordes fell off and joined the Kazaks. Thus about the year 1500 were formed two powerful states in the Kipchak and Kheta steppes, the Mogul-Ulus and the Kazak, the latter of whom, under their khan Arslane, are said by Sultan Baber to have had as many as 400,000 fighting men. Their numbers continued to be swollen by voluntary or enforced accessions from the fragments of the Golden Horde, such as the Kipchaks, Naimans, Konrats, Jalairs, Kankali, whose names are still preserved in the tribal divisions of the Kazaks. And as some of these peoples were undoubtedly of true Mongolian stock, their names have given a colour to the statement that all the Kazaks were rather of Mongol than of Turki origin. But the universal prevalence of a nearly pure variety of the Turki speech throughout the Kazak steppes is almost alone sufficient to show that the Tatar element must at all times have been in the ascendant. Very various accounts have been given of the relationship of the Kipchak to the Kirghiz, but at present they seem to form a subdivision of the Kirghiz-Kazaks. The Kara-Kalpaks are an allied but apparently separate tribe.
In their current homes, known as the “Kirghiz steppes,” they are much more numerous and widespread than their Kara-Kirghiz relatives, stretching almost uninterrupted from Lake Balkash around the Aral and Caspian Seas west to the lower Volga, and from the Irtish River south to the lower Oxus and Ust-Urt plateau. Their territory, which covers nearly 2,000,000 square miles, mainly lies between 45° and 55° N latitude and from 45° to 80° E longitude. Here, they came under the influence of Jenghiz Khan, and after his death, they fell under the control of his son Juji, the leader of the Golden Horde, while still managing to keep their own khans. When the Uzbegs rose to power, many of the former subjects of the Juji and Jagatai hordes broke away and joined the Kazaks. Around the year 1500, two powerful states formed in the Kipchak and Kheta steppes: the Mogul-Ulus and the Kazak. Under their khan Arslane, the Kazaks reportedly had as many as 400,000 fighting men, according to Sultan Baber. Their numbers continued to grow with voluntary or forced additions from remnants of the Golden Horde, including the Kipchaks, Naimans, Konrats, Jalairs, and Kankali, whose names are still found in the tribal divisions of the Kazaks. Since some of these groups were undoubtedly of true Mongolian descent, their names have contributed to the belief that the Kazaks were more Mongol than Turki in origin. However, the widespread use of a nearly pure form of the Turki language throughout the Kazak steppes strongly indicates that the Tatar element has always been dominant. Various accounts have been provided regarding the relationship between the Kipchak and the Kirghiz, but currently, they seem to be a subdivision of the Kirghiz-Kazaks. The Kara-Kalpaks are an allied but seemingly separate tribe.
The Kirghiz-Kazaks have long been grouped in three large “hordes” or encampments, further subdivided into a number of so-called “races,” which are again grouped in tribes, and these in sections, branches and auls, or communities of from five to fifteen tents. The division into hordes has been traditionally referred to a powerful khan, who divided his states amongst his three sons, the eldest of whom became the founder of the Ulu-Yuz, or Great Horde, the second of the Urta-Yuz, or Middle Horde, and the third of the Kachi-Yuz, or Little Horde. The last two under their common khan Abulkhair voluntarily submitted in 1730 to the Empress Anne. Most of the Great Horde were subdued by Yunus, khan of Ferghana, in 1798, and all the still independent tribes finally accepted Russian sovereignty in 1819.
The Kirghiz-Kazaks have traditionally been divided into three main "hordes" or camps, which are further broken down into various "races" that are then organized into tribes, sections, branches, and auls, or communities made up of five to fifteen tents. The division into hordes has historically been attributed to a powerful khan who divided his territory among his three sons. The eldest became the founder of the Ulu-Yuz, or Great Horde; the second founded the Urta-Yuz, or Middle Horde; and the youngest established the Kachi-Yuz, or Little Horde. The latter two, under their common khan Abulkhair, willingly submitted to Empress Anne in 1730. Most of the Great Horde was subdued by Yunus, the khan of Ferghana, in 1798, and all the remaining independent tribes ultimately accepted Russian rule in 1819.
Since 1801 a fourth division, known as the Inner or Bukeyevskaya Horde, from the name of their first khan, Bukei, has been settled in the Orenburg steppe.
Since 1801, a fourth group, called the Inner or Bukeyevskaya Horde, named after their first khan, Bukei, has been settled in the Orenburg steppe.
But these divisions affect the common people alone, all the higher orders and ruling families being broadly classed as White and Black Kost or Bones. The White Bones comprise only the khans and their descendants, besides the issue of the khojas or Moslem “saints.” The Black Bones include all the rest, except the Telengut or servants of the khans, and the Kûl or slaves.
But these divisions impact only the common people, while all the higher classes and ruling families are generally grouped as White and Black Kost or Bones. The White Bones consist solely of the khans and their descendants, along with the offspring of the khojas or Muslim “saints.” The Black Bones include everyone else, except the Telengut or servants of the khans, and the Kûl or slaves.
The Kazaks are an honest and trustworthy people, but heavy, sluggish, sullen and unfriendly. Even the hospitality enjoined by the Koran is displayed only towards the orthodox Sunnite sect. So essentially nomadic are all the tribes that they cannot adopt a settled life without losing the very sentiment of their nationality, and becoming rapidly absorbed in the Slav population. They dwell exclusively in semicircular tents consisting 829 of a light wooden framework, and red cloth or felt covering, with an opening above for light and ventilation.
The Kazaks are honest and trustworthy people, but they can also be heavy, slow, sullen, and unfriendly. Even the hospitality recommended by the Koran is only shown to the orthodox Sunnite sect. All the tribes are so nomadic that they can't settle down without losing their sense of nationality and quickly getting absorbed into the Slav population. They live exclusively in semicircular tents made of a light wooden frame and covered with red cloth or felt, featuring an opening on top for light and ventilation.
The camp life of the Kazaks seems almost unendurable to Europeans in winter, when they are confined altogether to the tent, and exposed to endless discomforts. In summer the day is spent mostly in sleep or drinking koumiss, followed at night by feasting and the recital of tales, varied with songs accompanied by the music of the flute and balalaika. But horsemanship is the great amusement of all true Kazaks, who may almost be said to be born in the saddle. Hence, though excellent riders, they are bad walkers. Though hardy and long-lived, they are uncleanly in their habits and often decimated by small-pox and Siberian plague. They have no fixed meals, and live mainly on mutton and goat and horse flesh, and instead of bread use the so-called balamyk, a mess of flour fried in dripping and diluted in water. The universal drink is koumiss, which is wholesome, nourishing and a specific against all chest diseases.
The camp life of the Kazaks seems almost unbearable to Europeans in winter when they are stuck entirely in the tent, facing endless discomforts. In summer, the day is mostly spent sleeping or drinking koumiss, followed by feasting and storytelling at night, mixed with songs accompanied by the flute and balalaika. But horsemanship is the main pastime for all true Kazaks, who can almost be said to be born in the saddle. Therefore, while they are excellent riders, they are not great walkers. Despite being tough and long-lived, they have poor hygiene and are often struck by smallpox and Siberian plague. They have no set meal times and mainly eat mutton, goat, and horse meat, and instead of bread, they use balamyk, a mixture of flour fried in fat and mixed with water. The common drink is koumiss, which is healthy, nourishing, and effective against all chest diseases.
The dress consists of the chapân, a flowing robe of which one or two are worn in summer and several in winter, fastened with a silk or leather girdle, in which are stuck a knife, tobacco pouch, seal and a few other trinkets. Broad silk or cloth pantaloons are often worn over the chapân, which is of velvet, silk, cotton or felt, according to the rank of the wearer. Large black or red leather boots, with round white felt pointed caps, complete the costume, which is much the same for both sexes.
The dress includes the chapân, a loose robe that people wear one or two during the summer and several in the winter, secured with a silk or leather belt, where they tuck a knife, tobacco pouch, seal, and a few other small items. Wide silk or cloth pants are often worn over the chapân, which can be made of velvet, silk, cotton, or felt, depending on the wearer’s status. The outfit is finished with large black or red leather boots and round white felt pointed hats, and it's pretty much the same for both men and women.
Like the Kara-Kirghiz, the Kazaks are nominally Sunnites, but Shamanists at heart, worshipping, besides the Kudai or good divinity, the Shaitan or bad spirit. Their faith is strong in the talchi or soothsayer and other charlatans, who know everything, can do everything, and heal all disorders at pleasure. But they are not fanatics, though holding the abstract doctrine that the “Kafir” may be lawfully oppressed, including in this category not only Buddhists and Christians, but even Mahommedans of the Shiah sect. There are no fasts or ablutions, mosques or mollahs, or regular prayers. Although Mussulmans since the beginning of the 16th century, they have scarcely yet found their way to Mecca, their pilgrims visiting instead the more convenient shrines of the “saints” scattered over eastern Turkestan. Unlike the Mongolians, the Kazaks treat their dead with great respect, and the low steppe hills are often entirely covered with monuments raised above their graves.
Like the Kara-Kirghiz, the Kazaks are technically Sunnis, but at heart, they follow Shamanism, worshiping both the Kudai, or good deity, and the Shaitan, or evil spirit. They place great faith in the talchi, or soothsayer, and other tricksters who claim to know everything, can do anything, and can heal any ailment at will. However, they're not fanatics, even though they believe that it’s permissible to oppress “Kafirs,” which includes not only Buddhists and Christians, but also Shia Muslims. They don't observe fasts, perform ablutions, attend mosques, or have religious leaders, nor do they engage in regular prayers. Although they have identified as Muslims since the early 16th century, they have barely made the pilgrimage to Mecca, opting instead to visit the more accessible shrines of “saints” scattered throughout eastern Turkestan. Unlike the Mongolians, the Kazaks show great respect for their dead, and the low steppe hills are often entirely covered with monuments raised over their graves.
Letters are neglected to such an extent that whoever can merely write is regarded as a savant, while he becomes a prodigy of learning if able to read the Koran in the original. Yet the Kazaks are naturally both musical and poetical, and possess a considerable number of national songs, which are usually repeated with variations from mouth to mouth.
Letters are so overlooked that anyone who can just write is seen as a genius, and if someone can read the Koran in the original language, they're considered extraordinarily knowledgeable. However, the Kazaks are inherently musical and poetic, and they have a significant collection of national songs that are typically passed down with variations from person to person.
The Kazaks still choose their own khans, who, though confirmed by the Russian government, possess little authority beyond their respective tribes. The real rulers are the elders or umpires and sultans, all appointed by public election. Brigandage and raids arising out of tribal feuds, which were formerly recognized institutions, are now severely punished, sometimes even with death. Capital punishment, usually by hanging or strangling, is inflicted for murder and adultery, while three, nine or twenty-seven times the value of the stolen property is exacted for theft.
The Kazaks still pick their own khans, who, though approved by the Russian government, have little power outside their own tribes. The real leaders are the elders, umpires, and sultans, all chosen by public election. Banditry and raids stemming from tribal disputes, which used to be accepted practices, are now harshly punished, sometimes even with death. The death penalty, typically by hanging or strangulation, is given for murder and adultery, while thieves must pay three, nine, or twenty-seven times the worth of what they stole.
The domestic animals, daily pursuits and industries of the Kazaks differ but slightly from those of the Kara-Kirghiz. Some of the wealthy steppe nomads own as many as 20,000 of the large fat-tailed sheep. Goats are kept chiefly as guides for these flocks; and the horses, though small, are hardy, swift, light-footed and capable of covering from 50 to 60 miles at a stretch. Amongst the Kazaks there are a few workers in silver, copper and iron, the chief arts besides, being skin dressing, wool spinning and dyeing, carpet and felt weaving. Trade is confined mainly to an exchange of live stock for woven and other goods from Russia, China and Turkestan.
The domesticated animals, daily activities, and industries of the Kazaks are only slightly different from those of the Kara-Kirghiz. Some wealthy steppe nomads own as many as 20,000 large fat-tailed sheep. Goats are primarily kept to guide these flocks, and the horses, while small, are tough, fast, nimble, and can travel 50 to 60 miles in one go. Among the Kazaks, there are a few artisans working with silver, copper, and iron, while the main crafts include skin dressing, wool spinning and dyeing, and weaving carpets and felt. Trade mostly involves exchanging livestock for woven and other goods from Russia, China, and Turkestan.
Since their subjection to Russia the Kazaks have become less lawless, but scarcely less nomadic. A change of habit in this respect is opposed alike to their tastes and to the climatic and other outward conditions. See also Turks.
Since they came under Russian control, the Kazaks have become less unruly, but they are still hardly less nomadic. A shift in this behavior goes against both their preferences and the climatic and other external conditions. See also Turks.
Literature.—Alexis Levshin, Description des hordes et des steppes des Kirghiz-Kazaks, translated from the Russian by Ferry de Cigny (1840); W. Radloff, Proben der Volksliteratur der Türkischen Stämme Südsiberiens; Ch. de Ujfalvy, Le Kohistan, le Ferghanah, et Kouldja; also Bull. de la Soc. de Géo. (1878-1879); Semenoff, paper in Petermann’s Mittheilungen (1859), No. 3; Valikhanov’s Travels in 1858-1859; Madame de Ujfalvy, papers in Tour du Monde (1874); Vambéry, Die primitive Cultur des Turko-Tatarischen Volkes; P. S. Pallas, Observations sur les Kirghiz (1769; French trans., 1803); Andriev, “La Horde Moyenne,” in Bull. de la Soc. de Géogr. de St Petersburg (1875); Radomtsev, Excursion dans le steppe Kirghiz; Lansdell, Russian Centralasia (1885); Jadrinzer, La Sibérie (1886). Skrine and Ross, Heart of Asia (1899); E. H. Parker, A Thousand Years of the Tartars (1895). Various Russian works by Nalivkin, published in Turkestan, contain much valuable information, and N. N. Pantusov, Specimens of Kirghiz Popular Poetry, with Russian translations (Kazan, 1903-1904).
Literature.—Alexis Levshin, Description des hordes et des steppes des Kirghiz-Kazaks, translated from the Russian by Ferry de Cigny (1840); W. Radloff, Proben der Volksliteratur der Türkischen Stämme Südsiberiens; Ch. de Ujfalvy, Le Kohistan, le Ferghanah, et Kouldja; also Bull. de la Soc. de Géo. (1878-1879); Semenoff, paper in Petermann’s Mittheilungen (1859), No. 3; Valikhanov’s Travels in 1858-1859; Madame de Ujfalvy, papers in Tour du Monde (1874); Vambéry, Die primitive Cultur des Turko-Tatarischen Volkes; P. S. Pallas, Observations sur les Kirghiz (1769; French trans., 1803); Andriev, “La Horde Moyenne,” in Bull. de la Soc. de Géogr. de St Petersburg (1875); Radomtsev, Excursion dans le steppe Kirghiz; Lansdell, Russian Centralasia (1885); Jadrinzer, La Sibérie (1886). Skrine and Ross, Heart of Asia (1899); E. H. Parker, A Thousand Years of the Tartars (1895). Various Russian works by Nalivkin, published in Turkestan, contain much valuable information, and N. N. Pantusov, Specimens of Kirghiz Popular Poetry, with Russian translations (Kazan, 1903-1904).

KIRIN, a province of central Manchuria, with a capital bearing the same name. The province has an area of 90,000 sq. m., and a population of 6,500,000. The chief towns besides the capital are Kwang-chêng-tsze, 80 m. N.W. of the capital, and Harbin on the Sungari river. The city of Kirin is situated at the foot of the Lau-Ye-Ling mountains, on the left bank of the Sungari or Girin-ula, there 300 yds. wide, and is served by a branch of the Manchurian railway. The situation is one of exceptional beauty; but the streets are narrow, irregular and indescribably filthy. The western part of the town is built upon a swamp and is under water a great part of the year. The dockyards are supplied with machinery from Europe and are efficient. Tobacco is the principal article of trade, the kind grown in the province being greatly prized throughout the Chinese empire under the name of “Manchu leaf.” Formerly ginseng was also an important staple, but the supply from this quarter of the country has been exhausted. Outside the town lies a plain “thickly covered with open coffins containing the dead bodies of Chinese emigrants exposed for identification and removal by their friends; if no claim is made during ten years the remains are buried on the spot.” Kirin was chosen by the emperor K’anghi as a military post during the wars with the Eleuths; and it owes its Chinese name of Ch’uen-ch’ang, i.e. Naval Yard, to his building there the vessels for the transport of his troops. The population was estimated at 300,000 in 1812; in 1909 it was about 120,000.
KIRIN, is a province in central Manchuria, with a capital of the same name. The province covers an area of 90,000 sq. m. and has a population of 6,500,000. The main towns, besides the capital, are Kwang-chêng-tsze, located 80 miles northwest of the capital, and Harbin, which is situated on the Sungari River. The city of Kirin is located at the base of the Lau-Ye-Ling mountains, on the left bank of the Sungari, also known as Girin-ula, which is 300 yards wide, and is connected by a branch of the Manchurian railway. The setting is exceptionally beautiful; however, the streets are narrow, irregular, and extremely dirty. The western part of the town is built on a swamp and is underwater for a large portion of the year. The dockyards are equipped with machinery from Europe and are efficient. Tobacco is the main product traded here, with the local variety valued throughout the Chinese empire as “Manchu leaf.” In the past, ginseng was also a significant export, but the supply from this region has been depleted. Just outside the town is a plain that is densely covered with open coffins containing the bodies of Chinese emigrants, which are displayed for identification and retrieval by their families; if there are no claims made within ten years, the remains are buried on the spot. Kirin was selected by Emperor K’anghi as a military outpost during the wars with the Eleuths, and it gets its Chinese name, Ch’uen-ch’ang, meaning Naval Yard, from his construction of ships there to transport his troops. The estimated population was 300,000 in 1812; by 1909, it had dropped to about 120,000.

KIRK, SIR JOHN (1832- ), British naturalist and administrator, son of the Rev. John Kirk, was born at Barry, near Arbroath, on the 19th of December 1832. He was educated at Edinburgh for the medical profession, and after serving on the civil medical staff throughout the Crimean War, was appointed in February 1858 physician and naturalist to David Livingstone’s second expedition to Central Africa. He was by Livingstone’s side in most of his journeyings during the next five years, and was one of the first four white men to behold Lake Nyassa (Sept. 16, 1859). He was finally invalided home on the 9th of May 1863. The reputation he gained during this expedition led to his appointment in January 1866 as acting surgeon to the political agency at Zanzibar. In 1868 he became assistant political agent, being raised to the rank of consul-general in 1873 and agent in 1880. He retired from that post in 1887. The twenty-one years spent by Kirk in Zanzibar covered the most critical period of the history of European intervention in East Africa; and during the greater part of that time he was the virtual ruler of the country. With Seyyid Bargash, who became sultan in 1870, he had a controlling influence, and after the failure of Sir Bartle Frere’s efforts he succeeded in obtaining (June 5, 1873) the sultan’s signature to a treaty abolishing the slave trade in his dominions. In 1877 Bargash offered to a British merchant—Sir W. Mackinnon—a lease of his mainland territories, and he gave Kirk a declaration in which he bound himself not to cede territory to any other power than Great Britain, a declaration ignored by the British government. When Germany in 1885 claimed districts considered by the sultan to belong to Zanzibar, Kirk intervened to prevent Bargash going in person to Berlin to protest and induced him to submit to the dismemberment of his dominions. In the delicate negotiations which followed 830 Kirk used his powers to checkmate the German designs to supplant the British in Zanzibar itself; this he did without destroying the Arab form of government. He also directed the efforts, this time successful, to obtain for Britain a portion of the mainland—Bargash in May 1887 granting to Mackinnon a lease of territory which led to the foundation of British East Africa. Having thus served both Great Britain and Zanzibar, Kirk resigned his post (July 1887), retiring from the consular service. In 1889-1890 he was a plenipotentiary at the slave trade conference in Brussels, and was one of the delegates who fixed the tariff duties to be imposed in the Congo basin. In 1895 he was sent by the British government on a mission to the Niger; and on his return he was appointed a member of the Foreign Office committee for constructing the Uganda railway. As a naturalist Kirk took high rank, and many species of the flora and fauna of Central Africa were made known by him, and several bear his name, e.g. the Otogale kirkii (a lemuroid), the Madoqua kirkii (a diminutive antelope), the Landolphia kirkii and the Clematis kirkii. For his services to geography he received in 1882 the patrons’ medal of the Royal Geographical Society, of which society he became foreign secretary. Kirk was created K.C.B. in 1900. He married, in 1867, Miss Helen Cooke.
Kirk, Sir John (1832- ), British naturalist and administrator, son of Rev. John Kirk, was born in Barry, near Arbroath, on December 19, 1832. He studied in Edinburgh to become a doctor and, after serving on the civil medical staff during the Crimean War, he was appointed in February 1858 as physician and naturalist for David Livingstone’s second expedition to Central Africa. He accompanied Livingstone on most of his travels over the next five years and was one of the first four white men to see Lake Nyassa (September 16, 1859). He was finally sent home due to health issues on May 9, 1863. The reputation he earned during this expedition led to his appointment in January 1866 as acting surgeon for the political agency at Zanzibar. In 1868, he became assistant political agent, was promoted to consul-general in 1873, and later became the agent in 1880. He retired from that position in 1887. Kirk spent twenty-one years in Zanzibar during the most critical period of European intervention in East Africa, and for most of that time, he was essentially the ruler of the area. With Seyyid Bargash, who became sultan in 1870, he had significant influence. After the failure of Sir Bartle Frere’s efforts, he managed to secure (June 5, 1873) the sultan’s agreement to a treaty ending the slave trade in his territories. In 1877, Bargash offered a lease of his mainland territories to British merchant Sir W. Mackinnon and provided Kirk with a declaration stating he would not cede land to any power other than Great Britain, a promise that was overlooked by the British government. When Germany claimed areas the sultan believed belonged to Zanzibar in 1885, Kirk stepped in to stop Bargash from going to Berlin to protest and persuaded him to accept the division of his dominions. In the sensitive negotiations that followed, 830 Kirk used his influence to thwart German efforts to replace the British in Zanzibar while maintaining the Arab form of government. He also directed successful efforts to secure a portion of the mainland for Britain—Bargash in May 1887 granting Mackinnon a lease of land that led to the establishment of British East Africa. After serving both Great Britain and Zanzibar, Kirk resigned (July 1887) and retired from the consular service. In 1889-1890, he was a plenipotentiary at the Brussels conference on the slave trade and was one of the delegates who set the tariff duties to be applied in the Congo basin. In 1895, the British government sent him on a mission to Niger, and upon his return, he was appointed to the Foreign Office committee for building the Uganda railway. As a naturalist, Kirk achieved a high status, discovering many species of flora and fauna in Central Africa, several of which are named after him, like the Otogale kirkii (a lemuroid), Madoqua kirkii (a small antelope), Landolphia kirkii, and Clematis kirkii. For his contributions to geography, he received the patrons’ medal from the Royal Geographical Society in 1882, where he later became the foreign secretary. Kirk was made a K.C.B. in 1900. He married Miss Helen Cooke in 1867.

KIRKBY, JOHN (d. 1290), English ecclesiastic and statesman, entered the public service as a clerk of the chancery during the reign of Henry III. Under Edward I. he acted as keeper of the great seal during the frequent absences of the chancellor, Robert Burnell, being referred to as vice-chancellor. In 1282 he was employed by the king to make a tour through the counties and boroughs for the purpose of collecting money; this and his other services to Edward were well rewarded, and although not yet ordained priest he held several valuable benefices in the church. In 1283 he was chosen bishop of Rochester, but owing to the opposition of the archbishop of Canterbury, John Peckham, he did not press his claim to this see. In 1286, however, two years after he had become treasurer, he was elected bishop of Ely, and he was ordained priest and then consecrated by Peckham. He died at Ely on the 26th of March 1290. Kirkby was a benefactor to his see, to which he left some property in London, including the locality now known as Ely Place, where for many years stood the London residence of the bishop of Ely.
Kirkby, John (d. 1290), an English church leader and politician, started his public service as a clerk in the chancery during Henry III's reign. Under Edward I, he served as the keeper of the great seal during the frequent absences of Chancellor Robert Burnell, earning the title of vice-chancellor. In 1282, he was tasked by the king to travel through the counties and boroughs to collect funds; this, along with his other contributions to Edward, was generously rewarded. Even though he hadn't yet become a priest, he held several valuable church positions. In 1283, he was selected as the bishop of Rochester, but because of opposition from the Archbishop of Canterbury, John Peckham, he didn’t pursue this position. However, in 1286, two years after becoming treasurer, he was elected bishop of Ely, was ordained a priest, and then consecrated by Peckham. He passed away in Ely on March 26, 1290. Kirkby was a benefactor to his diocese, leaving property in London, including the area now known as Ely Place, which for many years housed the London residence of the bishop of Ely.
Kirkby’s Quest is the name given to a survey of various English counties which was made under the bishop’s direction probably in 1284 and 1285. For this see Inquisitions and Assessments relating to Feudal Aids, 1284-1431, vol. i. (London, 1899).
Kirkby’s Quest is the title of a survey of different English counties conducted under the bishop’s direction likely in 1284 and 1285. For more details, see Inquisitions and Assessments relating to Feudal Aids, 1284-1431, vol. i. (London, 1899).

KIRKCALDY (locally pronounced Kerkawdi), a royal, municipal and police burgh and seaport of Fifeshire, Scotland. Pop. (1901), 34,079. It lies on the Firth of Forth, 26 m. N. of Edinburgh by the North British railway, via the Forth Bridge. Although Columba is said to have planted a church here, the authoritative history of the town does not begin for several centuries after the era of the saint. In 1240 the church was bestowed by David, bishop of St Andrews, on Dunfermline Abbey, and in 1334 the town with its harbour was granted by David II. to the same abbey, by which it was conveyed to the bailies and council in 1450, when Kirkcaldy was created a royal burgh. In the course of another century it had become an important commercial centre, the salt trade of the district being then the largest in Scotland. In 1644, when Charles I. raised it to a free port, it owned a hundred vessels, and six years later it was assessed as the sixth town in the kingdom. After the Union its shipping fell off, Jacobite troubles and the American War of Independence accelerating the decline. But its linen manufactures, begun early in the 18th century, gradually restored prosperity; and when other industries had taken root its fortunes advanced by leaps and bounds, and there is now no more flourishing community in Scotland. The chief topographical feature of the burgh is its length, from which it is called the “lang toun.” Formerly it consisted of little besides High Street, with closes and wynds branching off from it; but now that it has absorbed Invertiel, Linktown and Abbotshall on the west, and Pathhead, Sinclairtown and Gallatown on the east, it has reached a length of nearly 4 m. Its public buildings include the parish church, in the Gothic style, St Brycedale United Free church, with a spire 200 ft. high, a town-hall, corn exchange, public libraries, assembly rooms, fever hospital, sheriff court buildings, people’s club and institute, high school (1894)—on the site of the ancient burgh school (1582)—the Beveridge hall and free library, and the Adam Smith memorial hall. To the west lies Beveridge Park of 110 acres, including a large sheet of water, which was presented to the town in 1892. The harbour has an inner and outer division, with wet dock and wharves. Plans for its extension were approved in 1903. They include the extension of the east pier, the construction of a south pier 800 ft. in length, and of a tidal harbour 5 acres in area and a dock of 4 acres. Besides the manufacture of sheeting, towelling, ticks, dowlas and sail-cloth, the principal industries include flax-spinning, net-making, bleaching, dyeing, tanning, brewing, brass and iron founding, and there are potteries, flour-mills, engineering works, fisheries, and factories for the making of oil-cloth and linoleum. In 1847 Michael Nairn conceived the notion of utilizing the fibre of cork and oil-paint in such a way as to produce a floor-covering more lasting than carpet and yet capable of taking a pattern. The result of his experiments was oil-cloth, in the manufacture of which Kirkcaldy has kept the predominance to which Nairn’s enterprise entitled it. Indeed, this and the kindred linoleum business (also due to Nairn, who in 1877 built the first linoleum factory in Scotland) were for many years the monopoly of Kirkcaldy. There is a large direct export trade with the United States. Among well-known natives of the town were Adam Smith, Henry Balnaves of Halhill, the Scottish reformer and lord of session in the time of Queen Mary; George Gillespie, the theologian and a leading member of the Westminster Assembly, and his younger brother Patrick (1617-1675), a friend of Cromwell and principal of Glasgow University; John Ritchie (1778-1870), one of the founders of the Scotsman; General Sir John Oswald (1771-1840), who had a command at San Sebastian and Vittoria. Sir Michael Scott of Balwearie castle, about 1½ m. W. of the town, was sent with Sir David Wemyss to bring the Maid of Norway to Scotland in 1290; Sir Walter Scott was therefore in error in adopting the tradition that identified him with the wizard of the same name, who died in 1234. Carlyle and Edward Irving were teachers in the town, where Irving spent seven years, and where he made the acquaintance of the lady he afterwards married. Kirkcaldy combines with Dysart, Kinghorn and Burntisland to return one member to parliament.
Kirkcaldy (locally pronounced Kerkawdi) is a royal, municipal, and police burgh, as well as a seaport in Fifeshire, Scotland. Its population in 1901 was 34,079. It’s located on the Firth of Forth, 26 miles north of Edinburgh via the North British railway, through the Forth Bridge. Although Columba is said to have established a church here, the official history of the town doesn't start until several centuries after his time. In 1240, David, the bishop of St Andrews, granted the church to Dunfermline Abbey, and in 1334, the town and its harbour were given by David II to the same abbey, which transferred it to the bailies and council in 1450, when Kirkcaldy became a royal burgh. Over the next century, it developed into an important commercial center, with the salt trade being the largest in Scotland at that time. In 1644, when Charles I designated it as a free port, Kirkcaldy had a fleet of a hundred vessels, and six years later, it was ranked as the sixth largest town in the kingdom. After the Union, its shipping declined significantly, worsened by Jacobite conflicts and the American War of Independence. However, linen manufacturing, which began in the early 18th century, gradually restored its prosperity; as other industries emerged, the town's fortunes surged, and it is now one of the most thriving communities in Scotland. The town's main geographical feature is its length, which is why it's called the "lang toun." Initially, it comprised mostly High Street, with small alleys and lanes branching off; but now that it has absorbed Invertiel, Linktown, and Abbotshall to the west, and Pathhead, Sinclairtown, and Gallatown to the east, it stretches nearly 4 miles. Its public buildings include the parish church in Gothic style, St Brycedale United Free Church, which has a 200-foot-high spire, a town hall, a corn exchange, public libraries, assembly rooms, a fever hospital, sheriff court buildings, a people’s club and institute, a high school (built in 1894 on the site of the ancient burgh school from 1582), the Beveridge Hall and free library, and the Adam Smith memorial hall. To the west lies Beveridge Park, which covers 110 acres and includes a large body of water, gifted to the town in 1892. The harbour consists of inner and outer sections, with a wet dock and wharves. Plans for its expansion were approved in 1903, which include extending the east pier, building a south pier that’s 800 feet long, and creating a tidal harbour of 5 acres and a dock of 4 acres. In addition to manufacturing sheeting, toweling, ticks, dowlas, and sailcloth, the main industries also include flax-spinning, net-making, bleaching, dyeing, tanning, brewing, brass and iron founding, as well as potteries, flour mills, engineering works, fisheries, and factories producing oilcloth and linoleum. In 1847, Michael Nairn came up with the idea of using cork fibers and oil paint to create a durable floor covering that could take on patterns. His experiments led to the development of oilcloth, in which Kirkcaldy has maintained a leading position due to Nairn's innovation. In fact, the linoleum business, also initiated by Nairn—who built Scotland's first linoleum factory in 1877—was for many years monopolized by Kirkcaldy. There is a significant direct export trade with the United States. Some notable residents include Adam Smith, Henry Balnaves of Halhill, the Scottish reformer and lord of session during Queen Mary's reign; George Gillespie, the theologian and prominent member of the Westminster Assembly, along with his younger brother Patrick (1617-1675), a friend of Cromwell and principal of Glasgow University; John Ritchie (1778-1870), one of the founders of the Scotsman; and General Sir John Oswald (1771-1840), who commanded forces at San Sebastián and Vittoria. Sir Michael Scott of Balwearie Castle, located about 1.5 miles west of the town, was sent with Sir David Wemyss to bring the Maid of Norway to Scotland in 1290; Sir Walter Scott was mistaken in connecting him with the wizard of the same name who died in 1234. Carlyle and Edward Irving worked as teachers in the town, where Irving spent seven years and met the woman he eventually married. Kirkcaldy joins with Dysart, Kinghorn, and Burntisland to elect one member to parliament.

KIRKCALDY OF GRANGE, SIR WILLIAM (c. 1520-1573), Scottish politician, was the eldest son of Sir James Kirkcaldy of Grange (d. 1556), a member of an old Fifeshire family. Sir James was lord high treasurer of Scotland from 1537 to 1543 and was a determined opponent of Cardinal Beaton, for whose murder in 1546 he was partly responsible. William Kirkcaldy assisted to compass this murder, and when the castle of St Andrews surrendered to the French in July 1547 he was sent as a prisoner to Normandy, whence he escaped in 1550. He was then employed in France as a secret agent by the advisers of Edward VI., being known in the cyphers as Corax; and later he served in the French army, where he gained a lasting reputation for skill and bravery. The sentence passed on Kirkcaldy for his share in Beaton’s murder was removed in 1556, and returning to Scotland in 1557 he came quickly to the front; as a Protestant he was one of the leaders of the lords of the congregation in their struggle with the regent, Mary of Lorraine, and he assisted to harass the French troops in Fife. He opposed Queen Mary’s marriage with Darnley, being associated at this time with Murray, and was forced for a short time to seek refuge in England. Returning to Scotland, he was accessory to the murder of Rizzio, but he had no share in that of Darnley; and he was one of the lords who banded themselves together to rescue Mary after her marriage with Bothwell. After the fight at Carberry Hill the queen surrendered herself to Kirkcaldy, and his generalship was mainly responsible for her defeat at Langside. 831 He seems, however, to have believed that an arrangement with Mary was possible, and coming under the influence of Maitland of Lethington, whom in September 1569 he released by a stratagem from his confinement in Edinburgh, he was soon “vehemently suspected of his fellows.” After the murder of Murray Kirkcaldy ranged himself definitely among the friends of the imprisoned queen. About this time he forcibly released one of his supporters from imprisonment, a step which led to an altercation with his former friend John Knox, who called him a “murderer and throat-cutter.” Defying the regent Lennox, Kirkcaldy began to strengthen the fortifications of Edinburgh castle, of which he was governor, and which he held for Mary, and early in 1573 he refused to come to an agreement with the regent Morton because the terms of peace did not include a section of his friends. After this some English troops arrived to help the Scots, and in May 1573 the castle surrendered. Strenuous efforts were made to save Kirkcaldy from the vengeance of his foes, but they were unavailing; Knox had prophesied that he would be hanged, and he was hanged on the 3rd of August 1573.
Kirkcaldy of Grange, Sir William (c. 1520-1573), Scottish politician, was the eldest son of Sir James Kirkcaldy of Grange (d. 1556), a member of an old Fifeshire family. Sir James served as the lord high treasurer of Scotland from 1537 to 1543 and was a staunch opponent of Cardinal Beaton, for whose murder in 1546 he was partly responsible. William Kirkcaldy helped carry out this murder, and when the castle of St Andrews surrendered to the French in July 1547, he was taken as a prisoner to Normandy, where he escaped in 1550. He was then used in France as a secret agent by the advisors of Edward VI, known in the codes as Corax; later, he served in the French army and earned a solid reputation for his skill and bravery. The sentence placed on Kirkcaldy for his role in Beaton’s murder was lifted in 1556, and he returned to Scotland in 1557, quickly rising to prominence; as a Protestant, he became one of the leaders of the lords of the congregation in their fight against the regent, Mary of Lorraine, and he helped pressure the French troops in Fife. He opposed Queen Mary’s marriage to Darnley, aligning with Murray at this time and was briefly forced to seek refuge in England. Upon returning to Scotland, he was involved in the murder of Rizzio but had no part in Darnley’s death; he was also one of the lords who banded together to rescue Mary after her marriage to Bothwell. After the battle at Carberry Hill, the queen surrendered to Kirkcaldy, and his leadership was significantly responsible for her defeat at Langside. 831 He seems to have believed that a deal with Mary was possible, and coming under the influence of Maitland of Lethington, whom he secretly released from confinement in Edinburgh in September 1569, he soon became “strongly suspected by his peers.” After Murray’s murder, Kirkcaldy firmly aligned himself with the imprisoned queen. Around this time, he forcibly released one of his supporters from imprisonment, leading to a confrontation with his former ally John Knox, who labeled him a “murderer and throat-cutter.” Defying the regent Lennox, Kirkcaldy began strengthening the fortifications of Edinburgh Castle, which he governed and held for Mary, and early in 1573 he refused to negotiate with regent Morton because the peace terms excluded some of his allies. Subsequently, some English troops arrived to assist the Scots, and in May 1573, the castle surrendered. Intense efforts were made to save Kirkcaldy from the revenge of his enemies, but they were unsuccessful; Knox had predicted that he would be hanged, and he was executed on August 3, 1573.
See Sir James Melville’s Memoirs, edited by T. Thomson (Edinburgh, 1827); J. Grant, Memoirs and Adventures of Sir W. Kirkaldy (Edinburgh, 1849); L. A. Barbé, Kirkcaldy of Grange (1897); and A. Lang, History of Scotland, vol. ii. (1902).
See Sir James Melville’s Memoirs, edited by T. Thomson (Edinburgh, 1827); J. Grant, Memoirs and Adventures of Sir W. Kirkaldy (Edinburgh, 1849); L. A. Barbé, Kirkcaldy of Grange (1897); and A. Lang, History of Scotland, vol. ii. (1902).

KIRKCUDBRIGHT (pron. Ker-kú-bri), a royal and police burgh, and county town of Kirkcudbrightshire, Scotland. Pop. (1901), 2386. It is situated at the mouth of the Dee, 6 m. from the sea and 30 m. S.W. of Dumfries by the Glasgow & South-Western railway, being the terminus of a branch line. The old form of the name of the town was Kilcudbrit, from the Gaelic Cil Cudbert, “the chapel of Cuthbert,” the saint’s body having lain here for a short time during the seven years that lapsed between its exhumation at Lindisfarne and the re-interment at Chester-le-Street. The estuary of the Dee is divided at its head by the peninsula of St Mary’s Isle, but though the harbour is the best in south-western Scotland, the great distance to which the tide retreats impairs its usefulness. Among the public buildings are the academy, Johnstone public school, the county buildings, town-hall, museum, Mackenzie hall and market cross, the last-named standing in front of the old court-house, which is now used as a drill hall and fire-station. No traces remain of the Greyfriars’ or Franciscan convent founded by Alexander II., nor of the nunnery that was erected in the parish of Kirkcudbright. The ivy-clad ruins of Bomby castle, founded in 1582 by Sir Thomas Maclellan, ancestor of the barons of Kirkcudbright, stand at the end of the chief street. The town, which witnessed much of the international strife and Border lawlessness, was taken by Edward I. in 1300. It received its royal charter in 1455. After the battle of Towton, Henry VI. crossed the Solway (August 1461) and landed at Kirkcudbright to join Queen Margaret at Linlithgow. It successfully withstood the English siege in 1547 under Sir Thomas Carleton, but after the country had been overrun was compelled to surrender at discretion. Lord Maxwell, earl of Morton, as a Roman Catholic, mustered his tenants here to act in concert with the Armada; but on the approach of King James VI. to Dumfries he took ship at Kirkcudbright and was speedily captured. The burgh is one of the Dumfries district group of parliamentary burghs. On St Mary’s Isle was situated the seat of the earl of Selkirk, at whose house Robert Burns gave the famous Selkirk grace:—
Kirkcudbright (pron. Ker-kú-bri), a royal and police burgh and the county town of Kirkcudbrightshire, Scotland. Population (1901), 2386. It’s located at the mouth of the Dee, 6 miles from the sea and 30 miles southwest of Dumfries by the Glasgow & South-Western railway, serving as the terminus of a branch line. The town’s old name was Kilcudbrit, derived from the Gaelic Cil Cudbert, meaning “the chapel of Cuthbert,” where the saint’s body rested briefly during the seven years between its exhumation at Lindisfarne and reburial at Chester-le-Street. The estuary of the Dee is split at its head by the peninsula of St Mary’s Isle; however, despite having the best harbor in southwestern Scotland, its usefulness is diminished by the significant distance the tide retreats. Notable public buildings include the academy, Johnstone public school, the county buildings, town hall, museum, Mackenzie hall, and market cross, the latter standing in front of the old court house, which now functions as a drill hall and fire station. There are no remains of the Greyfriars’ or Franciscan convent founded by Alexander II, nor of the nunnery established in the parish of Kirkcudbright. The ivy-covered ruins of Bomby castle, built in 1582 by Sir Thomas Maclellan, the ancestor of the barons of Kirkcudbright, are located at the end of the main street. The town, which experienced much of the international conflict and Border lawlessness, was captured by Edward I in 1300. It received its royal charter in 1455. After the battle of Towton, Henry VI crossed the Solway (August 1461) and landed at Kirkcudbright to join Queen Margaret at Linlithgow. The town successfully resisted the English siege in 1547 under Sir Thomas Carleton, but after the country was overrun, it was forced to surrender unconditionally. Lord Maxwell, Earl of Morton, being a Roman Catholic, gathered his tenants here to work with the Armada; however, upon King James VI’s approach to Dumfries, he took a ship from Kirkcudbright and was quickly captured. The burgh is part of the Dumfries district group of parliamentary burghs. St Mary’s Isle was home to the seat of the Earl of Selkirk, where Robert Burns delivered the famous Selkirk grace:—
“Some ha’e meat; and canna eat, “Some have meat; and can’t eat, And some wad eat that want it; And some would eat that want it; But we ha’e meat, and we can eat, But we have meat, and we can eat, And sae the Lord be thankit.” Thank the Lord. |
Fergus, lord of Galloway, a celebrated church-builder of the 12th century, had his principal seat on Palace Isle in a lake called after him Loch Fergus, near St Mary’s Isle, where he erected the priory de Trayle, in token of his penitence for rebellion against David I. The priory was afterwards united as a dependent cell to the abbey of Holyrood. Dundrennan Abbey, 4½ m. S.E., was, however, his greatest achievement. It was a Cistercian house, colonized from Rievaulx, and was built in 1140. There now remain only the transept and choir, a unique example of the Early Pointed style. Tongueland (or Tungland), 2½ m. N. by E., has interesting historical associations. It was the site of a Premonstratensian abbey built by Fergus, and it was here that Queen Mary rested in her flight from the field of Langside (May 13, 1568). The well near Tongueland bridge from which she drank still bears the name of the Queen’s Well.
Fergus, the lord of Galloway and a renowned church builder in the 12th century, made his main residence on Palace Isle in a lake named Loch Fergus, near St Mary’s Isle. There, he established the priory de Trayle as a sign of his remorse for rebelling against David I. Later, the priory became a dependent cell of the abbey of Holyrood. Dundrennan Abbey, located 4½ miles southeast, was his most significant accomplishment. Founded in 1140, it was a Cistercian monastery established with help from Rievaulx. Today, only the transept and choir remain, showcasing a unique example of the Early Pointed style. Tongueland (or Tungland), situated 2½ miles north-by-east, holds intriguing historical significance. It was the location of a Premonstratensian abbey founded by Fergus, and it was here that Queen Mary took a rest while fleeing from the battle of Langside on May 13, 1568. The well near Tongueland bridge, from which she drank, is still known as the Queen’s Well.

KIRKCUDBRIGHTSHIRE (also known as the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright and East Galloway), a south-western county of Scotland, bounded N. and N.W. by Ayrshire, W. and S.W. by Wigtownshire, S. and S.E. by the Irish Sea and Solway Firth, and E. and N.E. by Dumfriesshire. It includes the small islands of Hestan and Little Ross, which are utilized as lighthouse stations. It has an area of 575,565 acres or 899 sq. m. The north-western part of the shire is rugged, wild and desolate. In this quarter the principal mountains are Merrick (2764 ft.), the highest in the south of Scotland, and the group of the Rinns of Kells, the chief peaks of which are Corscrine (2668), Carlins Cairn (2650), Meikle Millyea (2446) and Millfire (2350). Towards the south-west the chief eminences are Lamachan (2349), Larg (2216), and the bold mass of Cairnsmore of Fleet (2331). In the south-east the only imposing height is Criffel (1866). In the north rises the majestic hill of Cairnsmuir of Carsphairn (2612), and close to the Ayrshire border is the Windy Standard (2287). The southern section of the shire is mostly level or undulating, but characterized by much picturesque scenery. The shore is generally bold and rocky, indented by numerous estuaries forming natural harbours, which however are of little use for commerce owing to the shallowness of the sea. Large stretches of sand are exposed in the Solway at low water and the rapid flow of the tide has often occasioned loss of life. The number of “burns” and “waters” is remarkable, but their length seldom exceeds 7 or 8 m. Among the longer rivers are the Cree, which rises in Loch Moan and reaches the sea near Creetown after a course of about 30 m., during which it forms the boundary, at first of Ayrshire and then of Wigtownshire; the Dee or Black Water of Dee (so named from the peat by which it is coloured), which rises in Loch Dee and after a course mainly S.E. and finally S., enters the sea at St Mary’s Isle below Kirkcudbright, its length being nearly 36 m.; the Urr, rising in Loch Urr on the Dumfriesshire border, falls into the sea a few miles south of Dalbeattie 27 m. from its source; the Ken, rising on the confines of Ayrshire, flows mainly in a southerly direction and joins the Dee at the southern end of Loch Ken after a course of 24 m. through lovely scenery; and the Deugh which, rising on the northern flank of the Windy Standard, pursues an extraordinarily winding course of 20 m. before reaching the Ken. The Nith, during the last few miles of its flow, forms the boundary with Dumfriesshire, to which county it almost wholly belongs. The lochs and mountain tarns are many and well distributed; but except Loch Ken, which is about 6 m. long by ½ m. wide, few of them attain noteworthy dimensions. There are several passes in the hill regions, but the only well-known glen is Glen Trool, not far from the district of Carrick in Ayrshire, the fame of which rests partly on the romantic character of its scenery, which is very wild around Loch Trool, and more especially on its associations with Robert Bruce. It was here that when most closely beset by his enemies, who had tracked him to his fastness by sleuth hounds, Bruce with the aid of a few faithful followers won a surprise victory over the English in 1307 which proved the turning-point of his fortunes.
Kirkcudbrightshire (also known as the Kirkcudbrightshire and East Galloway) is a southwestern county in Scotland, bordered to the north and northwest by Ayrshire, to the west and southwest by Wigtownshire, to the south and southeast by the Irish Sea and Solway Firth, and to the east and northeast by Dumfriesshire. It includes the small islands of Hestan and Little Ross, which are used as lighthouse stations. The area covers 575,565 acres or 899 square miles. The northwestern part of the county is rugged, wild, and desolate. Here, the main mountains include Merrick (2,764 ft.), the highest in southern Scotland, and the group known as the Rinns of Kells, with major peaks like Corscrine (2,668 ft.), Carlins Cairn (2,650 ft.), Meikle Millyea (2,446 ft.), and Millfire (2,350 ft.). In the southwest, the key heights are Lamachan (2,349 ft.), Larg (2,216 ft.), and the striking Cairnsmore of Fleet (2,331 ft.). In the southeast, the imposing peak is Criffel (1,866 ft.). In the north, the impressive hill of Cairnsmuir of Carsphairn (2,612 ft.) rises, and near the Ayrshire border is the Windy Standard (2,287 ft.). The southern area of the county is mostly flat or rolling but features a lot of picturesque scenery. The coastline is generally bold and rocky, marked by several estuaries that create natural harbors, though they are of little use for commerce due to the shallowness of the sea. Large stretches of sandy beach appear in the Solway at low tide, and the fast-moving tides have often led to loss of life. The number of “burns” and “waters” is notable, but their lengths rarely exceed 7 or 8 miles. Among the longer rivers are the Cree, which starts at Loch Moan and flows into the sea near Creetown after about 30 miles, initially forming the boundary between Ayrshire and then Wigtownshire; the Dee or Black Water of Dee (named for the peat that colors it), which begins at Loch Dee and after mainly southeast, then south, reaches the sea at St Mary’s Isle below Kirkcudbright, measuring nearly 36 miles long; the Urr, which rises at Loch Urr on the Dumfriesshire border and falls into the sea a few miles south of Dalbeattie, 27 miles from its source; the Ken, starting near Ayrshire, flows mostly south to join the Dee at the southern end of Loch Ken after traveling 24 miles through beautiful scenery; and the Deugh, which starts on the northern slope of the Windy Standard, takes a winding 20-mile route before reaching the Ken. The Nith, in its last few miles, forms the boundary with Dumfriesshire, where it primarily belongs. There are many lochs and mountain tarns, but except for Loch Ken, which is about 6 miles long and ½ mile wide, few are of significant size. Several passes exist in the hill regions, but the only well-known glen is Glen Trool, located not far from the Carrick district in Ayrshire. It is famous for its wild scenery around Loch Trool and its historical connection to Robert Bruce. It was here that, when he faced his enemies who had tracked him to his hideout with bloodhounds, Bruce, with a few loyal followers, achieved a surprise victory over the English in 1307, a turning point in his fortunes.
Geology.—Silurian and Ordovician rocks are the most important in this county; they are thrown into oft-repeated folds with their axes lying in a N.E.-S.W. direction. The Ordovician rocks are graptolitic black shales and grits of Llandeilo and Caradoc age. They occupy all the northern part of the county north-west of a line which runs some 3 m. N. of New Galloway and just S. of the Rinns of Kells. South-east of this line graptolitic Silurian shales of Llandovery age prevail; they are found around Dalry, Creetown, New Galloway, Castle Douglas and Kirkcudbright. Overlying the Llandovery beds on the south coast are strips of Wenlock rocks; they extend from Bridgehouse Bay to Auchinleck and are well exposed in Kirkcudbright Bay, and they can be traced farther round the coast between the granite and the younger rocks. Carboniferous rocks appear in small faulted tracts, unconformable on the Silurian, on 832 the shores of the Solway Firth. They are best developed about Kirkbean, where they include a basal red breccia followed by conglomerates, grits and cement stones of Calciferous Sandstone age. Brick-red sandstones of Permian age just come within the county on the W. side of the Nith at Dumfries. Volcanic necks occur in the Permian and basalt dikes penetrate the Silurian at Borgue, Kirkandrews, &c. Most of the highest ground is formed by the masses of granite which have been intruded into the Ordovician and Silurian rocks; the Criffel mass lies about Dalbeattie and Bengairn, another mass extends east and west between the Cairnsmore of Fleet and Loch Ken, another lies N.W. and S.E. between Loch Doon and Loch Dee and a small mass forms the Cairnsmore of Carsphairn. Glacial deposits occupy much of the low ground; the ice, having travelled in a southerly or south-easterly direction, has left abundant striae on the higher ground to indicate its course. Radiation of the ice streams took place from the heights of Merrick, Kells, &c.; local moraines are found near Carsphairn and in the Deagh and Minnoch valleys. Glacial drumlins of boulder clay lie in the vales of the Dee, Cree and Urr.
Geology.—The most significant rocks in this county are from the Silurian and Ordovician periods; they are often folded with their axes aligned in a northeast-southwest direction. The Ordovician rocks consist of graptolitic black shales and grits from the Llandeilo and Caradoc ages. These rocks cover the entire northern part of the county, northwest of a line that runs about 3 miles north of New Galloway and just south of the Rinns of Kells. Southeast of this line, graptolitic Silurian shales from the Llandovery age dominate, found around Dalry, Creetown, New Galloway, Castle Douglas, and Kirkcudbright. Overlying the Llandovery beds along the south coast are strips of Wenlock rocks, which extend from Bridgehouse Bay to Auchinleck and are well exposed in Kirkcudbright Bay; they can be traced further along the coast between the granite and the younger rocks. Carboniferous rocks appear in small faulted sections that are not aligned with the Silurian rocks, located on the shores of the Solway Firth. They are most prominent around Kirkbean, where they include a basal red breccia followed by conglomerates, grits, and cement stones from the Calciferous Sandstone age. Brick-red sandstones from the Permian age just enter the county on the west side of the Nith at Dumfries. Volcanic necks are present in the Permian, and basalt dikes penetrate the Silurian at Borgue, Kirkandrews, etc. Most of the highest terrain is made up of granite masses that have intruded into the Ordovician and Silurian rocks; the Criffel mass is located near Dalbeattie, and another mass extends east and west between the Cairnsmore of Fleet and Loch Ken. Another mass lies northwest and southeast between Loch Doon and Loch Dee, and a small mass forms the Cairnsmore of Carsphairn. Glacial deposits cover much of the low-lying areas, with ice having moved in a southerly or southeast direction, leaving extensive striae on the higher ground to indicate its path. Ice streams radiated from the heights of Merrick, Kells, etc.; local moraines can be found near Carsphairn and in the Deagh and Minnoch valleys. Glacial drumlins of boulder clay are situated in the valleys of the Dee, Cree, and Urr.
Climate and Agriculture.—The climate and soil are better fitted for grass and green crops than for grain. The annual rainfall averages 45.7 in. The mean temperature for the year is 48° F.; for January 38.5°; for July 59°. The major part of the land is either waste or poor pasture. More than half the holdings consist of 50 acres and over. Oats is the predominant grain crop, the acreage under barley being small and that under wheat insignificant. Turnips are successfully cultivated, and potatoes are the only other green crop raised on a moderately large scale. Sheep-rearing has been pursued with great enterprise. The average is considerably in excess of that for Scotland. Blackfaced and Cheviots are the most common on the high ground, and a cross of Leicester with either is also in favour. Cattle-breeding is followed with steady success; the black polled Galloway is the general breed, but Aryshires have been introduced for dairying, cheese-making occupying much of the farmers’ attention. Horses are extensively raised, a breed of small-sized hardy and spirited animals being specifically known as Galloways. Most of the horses are used in agricultural work, but a large number are also kept for stock; Clydesdales are bred to some extent. Pig-rearing is an important pursuit, pork being supplied to the English markets in considerable quantities. During the last quarter of the 19th century the number of pigs increased 50%. Bee-keeping has been followed with special care and the honey of the shire is consequently in good repute. The proportion of woodland in the county is small.
Climate and Agriculture.—The climate and soil are better suited for grass and green crops than for grains. The average annual rainfall is 45.7 inches. The average temperature for the year is 48°F; for January, it’s 38.5°F; for July, it’s 59°F. Most of the land is either unused or poor pasture. More than half of the farms are 50 acres or larger. Oats are the main grain crop, while the area planted with barley is small and wheat is practically negligible. Turnips are successfully grown, and potatoes are the only other green crop produced on a moderately large scale. Sheep farming is thriving, with averages significantly higher than those in Scotland. Blackface and Cheviot sheep are the most common on the high ground, and a cross of Leicester with either is also popular. Cattle breeding is consistently successful; the black polled Galloway is the main breed, but Ayrshires have been brought in for dairy farming, with cheese-making drawing much of the farmers’ attention. Horses are raised extensively, with a specific breed of small, hardy, and spirited animals known as Galloways. Most horses are used for farm work, but many are also kept for breeding; Clydesdales are bred to some extent. Pig farming is an important activity, with pork being supplied to English markets in significant quantities. In the last quarter of the 19th century, the number of pigs increased by 50%. Beekeeping has been practiced with particular care, making the honey from the area well-regarded. The proportion of woodland in the county is small.
Industries.—The shire ranks next to Aberdeen as a granite-yielding county and the quarries occupy a large number of hands. In some towns and villages there are manufactures of linen, woollen and cotton goods; at various places distilling, brewing, tanning and paper-making are carried on, and at Dalbeattie there are brick and tile works. There is a little ship-building at Kirkcudbright. The Solway fishery is of small account, but salmon fishing is prosecuted at the mouth of certain rivers, the Dee fish being notable for their excellence.
Industries.—The shire is second only to Aberdeen in granite production, and the quarries employ a large number of people. In some towns and villages, they produce linen, wool, and cotton goods; in various locations, they engage in distilling, brewing, tanning, and paper-making, and in Dalbeattie, there are brick and tile factories. There’s a bit of shipbuilding happening in Kirkcudbright. The Solway fishery isn’t very significant, but salmon fishing is pursued at the mouths of certain rivers, with the Dee fish being especially known for their quality.
The only railway communication is by the Glasgow & South-Western railway running from Dumfries to Castle Douglas, from which there is a branch to Kirkcudbright, and the Portpatrick and Wigtownshire railway, beginning at Castle Douglas and leaving the county at Newton Stewart. These are supplemented by coaches between various points, as from New Galloway to Carsphairn, from Dumfries to New Abbey and Dalbeattie, and from Auchencairn to Dalbeattie.
The only railway connection is provided by the Glasgow & South-Western railway, which runs from Dumfries to Castle Douglas. There's a branch line to Kirkcudbright, and the Portpatrick and Wigtownshire railway starts at Castle Douglas and exits the county at Newton Stewart. Additionally, there are bus services between various locations, such as from New Galloway to Carsphairn, from Dumfries to New Abbey and Dalbeattie, and from Auchencairn to Dalbeattie.
Population and Government.—The population was 39,985 in 1891 and 39,383 in 1901, when 98 persons spoke Gaelic and English. The chief towns are Castle Douglas (pop. in 1901, 3018), Dalbeattie (3469), Kirkcudbright (2386), Maxwelltown (5796) with Creetown (991), and Gatehouse of Fleet (1013). The shire returns one member to parliament, and the county town (Kirkcudbright) belongs to the Dumfries district group of parliamentary burghs, and Maxwelltown is combined with Dumfries. The county forms part of the sheriffdom of Dumfries and Galloway, and there is a resident sheriff-substitute at Kirkcudbright. The county is under school-board jurisdiction. There is an academy at Kirkcudbright, high schools at Dumfries and Newton Stewart, and technical classes at Kirkcudbright, Dalbeattie, Castle Douglas and Dumfries.
Population and Government.—The population was 39,985 in 1891 and 39,383 in 1901, with 98 people speaking both Gaelic and English. The main towns are Castle Douglas (pop. in 1901, 3,018), Dalbeattie (3,469), Kirkcudbright (2,386), Maxwelltown (5,796), along with Creetown (991) and Gatehouse of Fleet (1,013). The shire elects one member to parliament, and the county town (Kirkcudbright) is part of the Dumfries district group of parliamentary burghs, with Maxwelltown linked to Dumfries. The county is part of the sheriffdom of Dumfries and Galloway, and there is a resident sheriff-substitute in Kirkcudbright. The county is governed by a school board. There is an academy in Kirkcudbright, high schools in Dumfries and Newton Stewart, and technical classes in Kirkcudbright, Dalbeattie, Castle Douglas, and Dumfries.
History.—The country west of the Nith was originally peopled by a tribe of Celtic Gaels called Novantae, or Atecott Picts, who, owing to their geographical position, which prevented any ready intermingling with the other Pictish tribes farther north, long retained their independence. After Agricola’s invasion in A.D. 79 the country nominally formed part of the Roman province, but the evidence is against there ever having been a prolonged effective Roman occupation. After the retreat of the Romans the Novantae remained for a time under their own chiefs, but in the 7th century accepted the overlordship of Northumbria. The Saxons, soon engaged in struggles with the Norsemen, had no leisure to look after their tributaries, and early in the 9th century the Atecotts made common cause with the Vikings. Henceforward they were styled, probably in contempt, Gallgaidhel, or stranger Gaels (i.e. Gaels who fraternized with the foreigners), the Welsh equivalent for which, Gallwyddel, gave rise to the name of Galloway (of which Galway is a variant), which was applied to their territory and still denotes the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright and the shire of Wigtown. When Scotland was consolidated under Kenneth MacAlpine (crowned at Scone in 844), Galloway was the only district in the south that did not form part of the kingdom; but in return for the services rendered to him at this crisis Kenneth gave his daughter in marriage to the Galloway chief, Olaf the White, and also conferred upon the men of Galloway the privilege of marching in the van of the Scottish armies, a right exercised and recognized for several centuries. During the next two hundred years the country had no rest from Danish and Saxon incursions and the continual lawlessness of the Scandinavian rovers. When Malcolm Canmore defeated and slew Macbeth in 1057 he married the dead king’s widow Ingibiorg, a Pictish princess, an event which marked the beginning of the decay of Norse influence. The Galloway chiefs hesitated for a time whether to throw in their lot with the Northumbrians or with Malcolm; but language, race and the situation of their country at length induced them to become lieges of the Scottish king. By the close of the 11th century the boundary between England and Scotland was roughly delimited on existing lines. The feudal system ultimately destroyed the power of the Galloway chiefs, who resisted the innovation to the last. Several of the lords or “kings” of Galloway, a line said to have been founded by Fergus, the greatest of them all, asserted in vain their independence of the Scottish crown; and in 1234 the line became extinct in the male branch on the death of Fergus’s great-grandson Alan. One of Alan’s daughters, Dervorguila, had married John de Baliol (father of the John de Baliol who was king of Scotland from 1292 until his abdication in 1296), and the people, out of affection for Alan’s daughter, were lukewarm in support of Robert Bruce. In 1308 the district was cleared of the English and brought under allegiance to the king, when the lordship of Galloway was given to Edward Bruce. Later in the 14th century Galloway espoused the cause of Edward Baliol, who surrendered several counties, including Kirkcudbright, to Edward III. In 1372 Archibald the Grim, a natural son of Sir James Douglas “the Good,” became Lord of Galloway and received in perpetual fee the Crown lands between the Nith and Cree. He appointed a steward to collect his revenues and administer justice, and there thus arose the designation of the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright. The high-handed rule of the Douglases created general discontent, and when their treason became apparent their territory was overrun by the king’s men in 1455; Douglas was attainted, and his honours and estates were forfeited. In that year the great stronghold of the Thrieve, the most important fortress in Galloway, which Archibald the Grim had built on the Dee immediately to the west of the modern town of Castle Douglas, was reduced and converted into a royal keep. (It was dismantled in 1640 by order of the Estates in consequence of the hostility of its keeper, Lord Nithsdale, to the Covenant.) The famous cannon Mons Meg, now in Edinburgh Castle, is said, apparently on insufficient evidence, to have been constructed in order to aid James III. in this siege. As the Douglases went down the Maxwells rose, and the debateable land on the south-east of 833 Dumfriesshire was for generations the scene of strife and raid, not only between the two nations but also among the leading families, of whom the Maxwells, Johnstones and Armstrongs were always conspicuous. After the battle of Solway Moss (1542) the shires of Kirkcudbright and Dumfries fell under English rule for a short period. The treaty of Norham (March 24, 1550) established a truce between the nations for ten years; and in 1552, the Wardens of the Marches consenting, the debateable land ceased to be matter for debate, the parish of Canonbie being annexed to Dumfriesshire, that of Kirkandrews to Cumberland. Though at the Reformation the Stewartry became fervent in its Protestantism, it was to Galloway, through the influence of the great landowners and the attachment of the people to them, that Mary owed her warmest adherents, and it was from the coast of Kirkcudbright that she made her luckless voyage to England. Even when the crowns were united in 1603 turbulence continued; for trouble arose over the attempt to establish episcopacy, and nowhere were the Covenanters more cruelly persecuted than in Galloway. After the union things mended slowly but surely, curious evidence of growing commercial prosperity being the enormous extent to which smuggling was carried on. No coast could serve the “free traders” better than the shores of Kirkcudbright, and the contraband trade flourished till the 19th century. The Jacobite risings of 1715 and 1745 elicited small sympathy from the inhabitants of the shire.
History.—The area west of the Nith was originally inhabited by a group of Celtic Gaels known as the Novantae, or Atecott Picts, who managed to maintain their independence for a long time due to their geographical isolation from other Pictish tribes further north. After Agricola's invasion in CE 79, the region was nominally included in the Roman province, but there’s little evidence of a long-term Roman occupation. Following the Romans' withdrawal, the Novantae initially remained under their own chiefs, but in the 7th century, they came to accept Northumbria's overlordship. The Saxons, who were soon caught up in conflicts with the Norsemen, had little time to manage their tributaries, and by the early 9th century, the Atecotts allied with the Vikings. From then on, they were derogatorily called Gallgaidhel, meaning foreign Gaels (i.e., Gaels who associated with outsiders), with the Welsh equivalent Gallwyddel eventually leading to the name Galloway (with Galway being a variant), which referred to their territory and still denotes the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright and Wigtownshire. When Scotland unified under Kenneth MacAlpine (who was crowned at Scone in 844), Galloway was the only southern region that did not become part of the kingdom; however, as a reward for their support during this pivotal time, Kenneth married his daughter to Olaf the White, the Galloway chief, and granted the men of Galloway the honor of leading Scottish armies, a right that lasted for several centuries. Over the next 200 years, the region faced constant Danish and Saxon invasions and ongoing lawlessness from Scandinavian pirates. After Malcolm Canmore defeated and killed Macbeth in 1057, he married the late king's widow Ingibiorg, a Pictish princess, which marked the decline of Norse influence. The Galloway chiefs briefly debated whether to align with the Northumbrians or Malcolm, but ultimately chose to become vassals of the Scottish king due to language, ethnicity, and the circumstances of their land. By the late 11th century, the border between England and Scotland was roughly established along existing lines. The feudal system ultimately eroded the power of the Galloway chiefs, who resisted this change until the end. Several of the lords or “kings” of Galloway, a lineage said to have been founded by Fergus, the greatest among them, vainly claimed independence from the Scottish crown; the line ended in 1234 with the death of Fergus’s great-grandson Alan. One of Alan’s daughters, Dervorguila, married John de Baliol (the father of the John de Baliol who ruled Scotland from 1292 until his abdication in 1296), and the local populace, valuing Alan's daughter, showed little enthusiasm for Robert Bruce. In 1308, the area was cleared of English forces and came under allegiance to the king, with the lordship of Galloway granted to Edward Bruce. Later in the 14th century, Galloway supported Edward Baliol, who surrendered several counties, including Kirkcudbright, to Edward III. In 1372, Archibald the Grim, the illegitimate son of Sir James Douglas “the Good,” became Lord of Galloway and received Crown lands from the Nith to the Cree in perpetual fee. He appointed a steward to collect his revenues and administer justice, giving rise to the term Stewartry of Kirkcudbright. The oppressive rule of the Douglases led to widespread discontent, and when their treason was exposed, their lands were invaded by the king's forces in 1455; Douglas was declared an outlaw, and his titles and territories were confiscated. That year, the significant fortress of Thrieve, built by Archibald the Grim on the Dee near modern Castle Douglas, was conquered and turned into a royal stronghold. (It was dismantled in 1640 by order of the Estates due to its keeper, Lord Nithsdale, opposing the Covenant.) The famous cannon, Mons Meg, currently located in Edinburgh Castle, is said, though likely with insufficient proof, to have been made to assist James III during this siege. As the Douglases fell, the Maxwells rose, and the disputed land in the southeast of 833 Dumfriesshire became a battleground not just between the two nations but also among prominent families like the Maxwells, Johnstones, and Armstrongs. After the battle of Solway Moss (1542), the areas of Kirkcudbright and Dumfries were briefly under English control. The Norham treaty (March 24, 1550) established a ten-year truce between the nations, and in 1552, with the consent of the Wardens of the Marches, the disputed territory was settled, with the parish of Canonbie annexed to Dumfriesshire and Kirkandrews to Cumberland. Though the Stewartry became ardently Protestant during the Reformation, Galloway, thanks to the influence of its major landowners and the people's loyalty to them, remained among Mary's strongest supporters, and it was from the Kirkcudbright coast that she made her ill-fated journey to England. Even after the crowns united in 1603, unrest persisted, particularly over attempts to establish episcopacy, and the Covenanters faced severe persecution in Galloway. Following the union, conditions gradually improved, with evidence of growing commercial prosperity shown by the extensive smuggling activities that took place. The shores of Kirkcudbright were ideal for “free traders,” and illegal trade thrived until the 19th century. The Jacobite uprisings of 1715 and 1745 garnered little sympathy from the local population.
See Sir Herbert Maxwell, History of Dumfries and Galloway (Edinburgh, 1896); Rev. Andrew Symson, A Large Description of Galloway (1684; new ed., 1823); Thomas Murray, The Literary History of Galloway (1822); Rev. William Mackenzie, History of Galloway (1841); P. H. McKerlie, History of the Lands and their Owners in Galloway (Edinburgh, 1870-1879); Galloway Ancient and Modern (Edinburgh, 1891); J. A. H. Murray, Dialect of the Southern Counties of Scotland (London, 1873).
See Sir Herbert Maxwell, History of Dumfries and Galloway (Edinburgh, 1896); Rev. Andrew Symson, A Large Description of Galloway (1684; new ed., 1823); Thomas Murray, The Literary History of Galloway (1822); Rev. William Mackenzie, History of Galloway (1841); P. H. McKerlie, History of the Lands and their Owners in Galloway (Edinburgh, 1870-1879); Galloway Ancient and Modern (Edinburgh, 1891); J. A. H. Murray, Dialect of the Southern Counties of Scotland (London, 1873).

KIRKE, PERCY (c. 1646-1691), English soldier, was the son of George Kirke, a court official to Charles I. and Charles II. In 1666 he obtained his first commission in the Lord Admiral’s regiment, and subsequently served in the Blues. He was with Monmouth at Maestricht (1673), and was present during two campaigns with Turenne on the Rhine. In 1680 he became lieutenant-colonel, and soon afterwards colonel of one of the Tangier regiments (afterwards the King’s Own Royal Lancaster Regt.) In 1682 Kirke became governor of Tangier, and colonel of the old Tangier regiment (afterwards the Queen’s Royal West Surrey). He distinguished himself very greatly as governor, though he gave offence by the roughness of his manners and the wildness of his life. On the evacuation of Tangier “Kirke’s Lambs” (so called from their badge) returned to England, and a year later their colonel served as a brigadier in Faversham’s army. After Sedgemoor the rebels were treated with great severity; but the charges so often brought against the “Lambs” are now known to be exaggerated, though the regiment shared to the full in the ruthless hunting down of the fugitives. It is often stated that it formed Jeffreys’s escort in the “Bloody Assize,” but this is erroneous. Brigadier Kirke took a notable part in the Revolution three years later, and William III. promoted him. He commanded at the relief of Derry, and made his last campaign in Flanders in 1691. He died, a lieutenant-general, at Brussels in October of that year. His eldest son, Lieut.-General Percy Kirke (1684-1741), was also colonel of the “Lambs.”
KIRKE, PERCY (c. 1646-1691), was an English soldier and the son of George Kirke, a court official for Charles I and Charles II. In 1666, he received his first commission in the Lord Admiral’s regiment and later served in the Blues. He was with Monmouth at Maestricht in 1673 and participated in two campaigns with Turenne on the Rhine. In 1680, he became lieutenant-colonel and soon after colonel of one of the Tangier regiments (later the King’s Own Royal Lancaster Regt.). In 1682, Kirke was appointed governor of Tangier and colonel of the old Tangier regiment (later the Queen’s Royal West Surrey). He made a significant impact as governor, though his abrasive manner and reckless lifestyle offended some. When Tangier was evacuated, “Kirke’s Lambs” (named after their badge) returned to England, and a year later, their colonel served as a brigadier in Faversham’s army. After Sedgemoor, the rebels faced harsh treatment; however, the accusations against the “Lambs” are now recognized as exaggerated, even though the regiment actively participated in the ruthless pursuit of the fugitives. It is often claimed that they were Jeffreys’s escort during the “Bloody Assize,” but that is incorrect. Brigadier Kirke played a notable role in the Revolution three years later and was promoted by William III. He commanded the relief of Derry and made his last campaign in Flanders in 1691. He died as a lieutenant-general in Brussels in October of that year. His eldest son, Lieut.-General Percy Kirke (1684-1741), also became colonel of the “Lambs.”

KIRKEE (or Kirki), a town and military cantonment of British India in Poona district, Bombay, 4 m. N.W. of Poona city. Pop. (1901), 10,797. It is the principal artillery station in the Bombay presidency, and has a large ammunition factory. It was the scene of a victory over Baji Rao, the last peshwa, in 1817.
KIRKEE (or Kirki) is a town and military cantonment in British India, located in the Poona district of Bombay, 4 miles northwest of the city of Poona. The population in 1901 was 10,797. It serves as the main artillery station in the Bombay presidency and has a large ammunition factory. It was the site of a victory over Baji Rao, the last peshwa, in 1817.

KIRKINTILLOCH, a municipal and police burgh of Dumbartonshire, Scotland. Pop. (1901), 10,680. It is situated 8 m. N.E. of Glasgow, by the North British railway, a portion of the parish extending into Lanarkshire. It lies on the Forth & Clyde canal, and the Kelvin—from which Lord Kelvin, the distinguished scientist, took the title of his barony—flows past the town, where it receives from the north the Glazert and from the south the Luggie, commemorated by David Gray. The Wall of Antoninus ran through the site of the town, the Gaelic name of which (Caer, a fort, not Kirk, a church) means “the fort at the end of the ridge.” The town became a burgh of barony under the Comyns in 1170. The cruciform parish church with crow-stepped gables dates from 1644. The public buildings include the town-hall, with a clock tower, the temperance hall, a convalescent home, the Broomhill home for incurables (largely due to Miss Beatrice Clugston, to whom a memorial was erected in 1891), and the Westermains asylum. In 1898 the burgh acquired as a private park the Peel, containing traces of the Roman Wall, a fort, and the foundation of Comyn’s Castle. The leading industries are chemical manufactures, iron-founding, muslin-weaving, coal mining and timber sawing. Lenzie, a suburb, a mile to the south of the old town, contains the imposing towered edifice in the Elizabethan style which houses the Barony asylum. David Gray, the poet, was born at Merkland, near by, and is buried in Kirkintilloch churchyard, where a monument was erected to his memory in 1865.
Kirkintilloch, a town and police burgh in Dumbartonshire, Scotland. Population (1901), 10,680. It's located 8 miles northeast of Glasgow, along the North British railway, with part of the parish extending into Lanarkshire. It sits on the Forth & Clyde canal, and the Kelvin—after which the distinguished scientist Lord Kelvin named his barony—flows through the town, receiving the Glazert from the north and the Luggie from the south, which David Gray wrote about. The Wall of Antoninus ran through the area of the town, whose Gaelic name (Caer, meaning 'fort', not Kirk, meaning 'church') translates to “the fort at the end of the ridge.” The town became a burgh of barony under the Comyns in 1170. The cross-shaped parish church with stepped gables dates back to 1644. Public buildings include the town hall with a clock tower, a temperance hall, a convalescent home, Broomhill home for incurables (largely thanks to Miss Beatrice Clugston, in whose honor a memorial was erected in 1891), and the Westermains asylum. In 1898, the burgh acquired the Peel as a private park, which contains remnants of the Roman Wall, a fort, and the foundations of Comyn’s Castle. The major industries are chemical manufacturing, iron founding, muslin weaving, coal mining, and timber sawing. Lenzie, a suburb a mile south of the old town, features an impressive Elizabethan-style building that houses the Barony asylum. The poet David Gray was born nearby in Merkland and is buried in the Kirkintilloch churchyard, where a monument was dedicated to him in 1865.

KIRK-KILISSEH (Kirk-Kilisse or Kirk-Kilissia), a town of European Turkey, in the vilayet of Adrianople, 35 m. E. of Adrianople. Pop. (1905), about 16,000, of whom about half are Greeks, and the remainder Bulgarians, Turks and Jews. Kirk-Kilisseh is built near the headwaters of several small tributaries of the river Ergene, and on the western slope of the Istranja Dagh. It owes its chief importance to its position at the southern outlet of the Fakhi defile over these mountains, through which passes the shortest road from Shumla to Constantinople. The name Kirk-Kilisseh signifies “four churches,” and the town possesses many mosques and Greek churches. It has an important trade with Constantinople in butter and cheese, and also exports wine, brandy, cereals and tobacco.
KIRK-KILISSEH (Kirk-Kilisse or Kirk-Kilissia), a town in European Turkey, located in the Adrianople province, 35 miles east of Adrianople. Population (1905) is around 16,000, with about half being Greeks and the rest Bulgarians, Turks, and Jews. Kirk-Kilisseh is situated near the headwaters of several small tributaries of the Ergene River, on the western slope of the Istranja Mountains. Its significance comes from its location at the southern exit of the Fakhi gorge over these mountains, which is the shortest route from Shumla to Constantinople. The name Kirk-Kilisseh means “four churches,” and the town has many mosques and Greek churches. It has a notable trade with Constantinople in butter and cheese, and also exports wine, brandy, grains, and tobacco.

KIRKSVILLE, a city and the county-seat of Adair county, Missouri, U.S.A., about 129 m. N. by W. of Jefferson City. Pop. (1900), 5966, including 112 foreign-born and 291 negroes; (1910), 6347. It is served by the Wabash and the Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City railways. It lies on a rolling prairie at an elevation of 975 ft. above the sea. It is the seat of the First District Missouri State Normal School (1870); of the American School of Osteopathy (opened 1892); and of the related A. T. Still Infirmary (incorporated 1895), named in honour of its founder, Andrew Taylor Still (b. 1820), the originator of osteopathic treatment, who settled here in 1875. In 1908 the School of Osteopathy had 18 instructors and 398 students. Grain and fruit are grown in large quantities, and much coal is mined in the vicinity of Kirksville. Its manufactures are shoes, bricks, lumber, ice, agricultural implements, wagons and handles. Kirksville was laid out in 1842, and was named in honour of Jesse Kirk. It was incorporated as a town in 1857 and chartered as a city of the third class in 1892. In April 1899 a cyclone caused serious damage to the city.
KIRKSVILLE, is a city and the county seat of Adair County, Missouri, U.S.A., located about 129 miles northwest of Jefferson City. The population was 5,966 in 1900, including 112 foreign-born individuals and 291 Black residents; it grew to 6,347 by 1910. The city is served by the Wabash and the Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City railways. It is situated on rolling prairie land at an elevation of 975 feet above sea level. Kirksville is home to the First District Missouri State Normal School (established in 1870), the American School of Osteopathy (opened in 1892), and the A. T. Still Infirmary (incorporated in 1895), named after its founder, Andrew Taylor Still (born 1820), who created osteopathic treatment and settled here in 1875. In 1908, the School of Osteopathy had 18 instructors and 398 students. The area produces large quantities of grain and fruit, and significant coal mining occurs around Kirksville. Its manufacturing includes shoes, bricks, lumber, ice, agricultural equipment, wagons, and handles. Kirksville was established in 1842 and named in honor of Jesse Kirk. It became a town in 1857 and was chartered as a third-class city in 1892. A cyclone caused serious damage to the city in April 1899.

KIRKWALL (Norse, Kirkjuvagr, “church bay”), a royal, municipal and police burgh, seaport and capital of the Orkney Islands, county of Orkney, Scotland. Pop. (1901), 3711. It is situated at the head of a bay of the same name on the east of the island of Pomona, or Mainland, 247 m. N. of Leith and 54 m. N. of Wick by steamer. Much of the city is quaint-looking and old-fashioned, its main street (nearly 1 m. long) being in parts so narrow that two vehicles cannot pass each other. The more modern quarters are built with great regularity and the suburbs contain several substantial villas surrounded by gardens. Kirkwall has very few manufactures. The linen trade introduced in the middle of the 18th century is extinct, and a like fate has overtaken the kelp and straw-plaiting industries. Distilling however prospers, and the town is important not only as regards its shipping and the deep-sea fishery, but also as a distributing centre for the islands and the seat of the superior law courts. The port has two piers. Kirkwall received its first charter from James III. in 1486, but the provisions of this instrument being disregarded by such men as Robert (d. 1592) and Patrick Stewart (d. 1614), 1st and 2nd earls of Orkney, and others, the Scottish 834 parliament passed an act in 1670 confirming the charter granted by Charles II. in 1661. The prime object of interest is the cathedral of St Magnus, a stately cruciform red sandstone structure in the severest Norman, with touches of Gothic. It was founded by Jarl Rognvald (Earl Ronald) in 1137 in memory of his uncle Jarl Magnus who was assassinated in the island of Egilshay in 1115, and afterwards canonized and adopted as the patron saint of the Orkneys. The remains of St Magnus were ultimately interred in the cathedral. The church is 234 ft. long from east to west and 56 ft. broad, 71 ft. high from floor to roof, and 133 ft. to the top of the present spire—the transepts being the oldest portion. The choir was lengthened and the beautiful eastern rose window added by Bishop Stewart in 1511, and the porch and the western end of the nave were finished in 1540 by Bishop Robert Reid. Saving that the upper half of the original spire was struck by lightning in 1671, and not rebuilt, the cathedral is complete at all points, but it underwent extensive repairs in the 19th century. The disproportionate height and narrowness of the building lend it a certain distinction which otherwise it would have lacked. The sandstone has not resisted the effects of weather, and much of the external decorative work has perished. The choir is used as the parish church. The skellat, or fire-bell, is not rung now. The church of St Olaf, from which the town took its name, was burned down by the English in 1502; and of the church erected on its site by Bishop Reid—the greatest building the Orkneys ever had—little more than the merest fragment survives. Nothing remains of the old castle, a fortress of remarkable strength founded by Sir Henry Sinclair (d. 1400), earl and prince of Orkney and 1st earl of Caithness, its last vestiges having been demolished in 1865 to provide better access to the harbour; and the earthwork to the east of the town thrown up by the Cromwellians has been converted into a battery of the Orkney Artillery Volunteers. Adjoining the cathedral are the ruins of the bishop’s palace, in which King Haco died after his defeat at Largs in 1263. The round tower, which still stands, was added in 1550 by Bishop Reid. It is known as the Mass Tower and contains a niche in which is a small effigy believed to represent the founder, who also endowed the grammar school which is still in existence. To the east of the remains of the bishop’s palace are the ruins of the earl’s palace, a structure in the Scottish Baronial style, built about 1600 for Patrick Stewart, 2nd earl of Orkney, and on his forfeiture given to the bishops for a residence. Tankerness House is a characteristic example of the mansion of an Orkney laird of the olden time. Other public buildings include the municipal buildings, the sheriff court and county buildings, Balfour hospital, and the fever hospital. There is daily communication with Scrabster pier (Thurso), via Scapa pier, on the southern side of the waist of Pomona, about 1½ m. to the S. of Kirkwall; and steamers sail at regular intervals from the harbour to Wick, Aberdeen and Leith. Good roads place the capital in touch with most places in the island and a coach runs twice a day to Stromness. Kirkwall belongs to the Wick district group of parliamentary burghs, the others being Cromarty, Dingwall, Dornoch and Tain.
KIRKWALL (Norse, Kirkjuvagr, “church bay”) is a royal, municipal, and police burgh, seaport, and the capital of the Orkney Islands, located in the county of Orkney, Scotland. Population (1901): 3,711. It is positioned at the head of a bay with the same name on the eastern side of the island of Pomona, or Mainland, 247 miles north of Leith and 54 miles north of Wick by steamer. Much of the city has a quaint, old-fashioned look, with its main street (almost 1 mile long) being narrow in parts, so two vehicles cannot pass each other. The more modern areas are built with great order, and the suburbs feature several substantial villas surrounded by gardens. Kirkwall has very few industries. The linen trade, introduced in the mid-18th century, has died out, and a similar fate has befallen the kelp and straw-plaiting industries. However, distilling is thriving, and the town is significant not just for its shipping and deep-sea fishing but also as a distribution center for the islands and the location of the superior law courts. The port has two piers. Kirkwall received its first charter from James III in 1486, but it was essentially ignored by figures like Robert (d. 1592) and Patrick Stewart (d. 1614), the 1st and 2nd earls of Orkney, and others. Therefore, the Scottish parliament passed an act in 1670 confirming the charter granted by Charles II in 1661. The main point of interest is the cathedral of St Magnus, a grand cruciform structure made of red sandstone in a strict Norman style, with some Gothic touches. It was founded by Jarl Rognvald (Earl Ronald) in 1137 to honor his uncle Jarl Magnus, who was assassinated on the island of Egilshay in 1115, later canonized, and became the patron saint of the Orkneys. The remains of St Magnus were finally buried in the cathedral. The church measures 234 feet long from east to west and 56 feet wide, with a height of 71 feet from floor to roof, and 133 feet to the top of the current spire—the transepts being the oldest part. Bishop Stewart extended the choir and added the beautiful eastern rose window in 1511, and Bishop Robert Reid completed the porch and western end of the nave in 1540. Except for the upper part of the original spire, which was struck by lightning in 1671 and not rebuilt, the cathedral is intact at all points, though extensive repairs were made in the 19th century. The disproportionate height and narrowness of the building give it a unique distinction that it otherwise might lack. The sandstone has suffered from weathering, and much of the external decorative work has deteriorated. The choir serves as the parish church. The skellat, or fire-bell, is no longer rung. The church of St Olaf, from which the town got its name, was burned down by the English in 1502; and of the church built on its site by Bishop Reid—the largest building ever in the Orkneys—only a tiny fragment remains. Nothing is left of the old castle, a fortress of significant strength founded by Sir Henry Sinclair (d. 1400), earl and prince of Orkney and the first earl of Caithness, with its last remains demolished in 1865 to improve access to the harbor; and the earthworks to the east of the town, built by the Cromwellians, have been turned into a battery for the Orkney Artillery Volunteers. Next to the cathedral are the ruins of the bishop’s palace, where King Haco died after his defeat at Largs in 1263. The standing round tower was added in 1550 by Bishop Reid. Known as the Mass Tower, it contains a niche with a small effigy believed to represent the founder, who also established the grammar school that still exists. East of the bishop’s palace ruins are the remnants of the earl’s palace, built around 1600 for Patrick Stewart, the 2nd earl of Orkney, which was later given to the bishops for use as a residence. Tankerness House exemplifies the mansion of a traditional Orkney laird from earlier times. Other public buildings include municipal structures, the sheriff court and county buildings, Balfour Hospital, and the fever hospital. There is daily communication with Scrabster pier (Thurso) via Scapa pier, located about 1½ miles south of Kirkwall; and steamers regularly sail from the harbor to Wick, Aberdeen, and Leith. Good roads connect the capital to most places on the island, and a coach runs twice a day to Stromness. Kirkwall is part of the Wick district group of parliamentary burghs, which includes Cromarty, Dingwall, Dornoch, and Tain.

KIRRIEMUIR, a police burgh of Forfarshire, Scotland. Pop. (1901), 4096. It is situated on a height above the glen through which the Gairie flows, 6¼ m. N.W. of Forfar by a branch line of the Caledonian railway of which it is the terminus. There are libraries, a public hall and a park. The staple industry is linen-weaving. The hand-loom lingered longer here than in any other place in Scotland and is not yet wholly extinct. The Rev. Dr Alexander Whyte (b. 1837) and J. M. Barrie (b. 1860) are natives, the latter having made the town famous under the name of “Thrums.” The original Secession church—the kirk of the Auld Lichts—was founded in 1806 and rebuilt in 1893. Kinnordy, 1½ m. N.W., was the birthplace of Sir Charles Lyell the geologist; and Cortachy castle, a fine mansion in the Scottish Baronial style, about 4 m. N., is the seat of the earl of Airlie.
KIRRIEMUIR, is a police burgh in Forfarshire, Scotland. Population (1901): 4,096. It’s located on a hill overlooking the valley through which the Gairie River flows, 6¼ miles northwest of Forfar along a branch line of the Caledonian railway, which is its terminus. There are libraries, a public hall, and a park. The main industry is linen-weaving. Hand-loom weaving lasted longer here than anywhere else in Scotland and is still not completely gone. Rev. Dr. Alexander Whyte (born 1837) and J. M. Barrie (born 1860) are both from here, with Barrie making the town famous by referring to it as “Thrums.” The original Secession church—the kirk of the Auld Lichts—was established in 1806 and rebuilt in 1893. Kinnordy, located 1½ miles northwest, is the birthplace of geologist Sir Charles Lyell; and Cortachy Castle, an impressive mansion in the Scottish Baronial style about 4 miles north, is the home of the Earl of Airlie.

KIRSCH (or Kirschenwasser), a potable spirit distilled from cherries. Kirsch is manufactured chiefly in the Black Forest in Germany, and in the Vosges and Jura districts in France. Generally the raw material consists of the wild cherry known as Cerasus avium. The cherries are subjected to natural fermentation and subsequent distillation. Occasionally a certain quantity of sugar and water are added to the cherries after crushing, and the mass so obtained is filtered or pressed prior to fermentation. The spirit is usually “run” at a strength of about 50% of absolute alcohol. Compared with brandy or whisky the characteristic features of kirsch are (a) that it contains relatively large quantities of higher alcohols and compound ethers, and (b) the presence in this spirit of small quantities of hydrocyanic acid, partly as such and partly in combination as benzaldehyde-cyanhydrine, to which the distinctive flavour of kirsch is largely due.
KIRSCH (or Cherry brandy) is a drinkable spirit made from cherries. Kirsch is primarily produced in the Black Forest in Germany, and in the Vosges and Jura regions in France. The main ingredient used is the wild cherry known as Cerasus avium. The cherries undergo natural fermentation and are then distilled. Sometimes, a bit of sugar and water are added to the cherries after they are crushed, and this mixture is filtered or pressed before fermentation. The spirit is usually distilled to about 50% absolute alcohol. Compared to brandy or whisky, kirsch has distinctive characteristics: (a) it contains relatively high amounts of higher alcohols and compound ethers, and (b) it has small amounts of hydrocyanic acid, both free and as benzaldehyde-cyanhydrine, which contribute to its unique flavor.

KIR-SHEHER, the chief town of a sanjak of the same name in the Angora vilayet of Asia Minor, situated on a tributary of the Kizil Irmak (Halys), on the Angora-Kaisarieh road. It is on the line of the projected railway from Angora to Kaisarieh. The town gives its name to the excellent carpets made in the vicinity. On the outskirts there is a hot chalybeate spring. Population about 9000 (700 Christians, mostly Armenians). Kir-sheher represents the ancient Mocissus, a small town which became important in the Byzantine period: it was enlarged by the emperor Justinian, who re-named it Justinianopolis, and made it the capital of a large division of Cappadocia, a position it still retains.
KIR-SHEHER,, the main town of a district with the same name in the Angora region of Asia Minor, is located on a tributary of the Kizil Irmak (Halys), along the Angora-Kaisarieh road. It is planned to be part of the railway line connecting Angora to Kaisarieh. The town is known for the high-quality carpets made in the area. There is a hot mineral spring on the outskirts. The population is around 9,000, including 700 Christians, mostly Armenians. Kir-sheher is the site of the ancient Mocissus, a small town that gained significance during the Byzantine era: it was expanded by Emperor Justinian, who renamed it Justinianopolis and established it as the capital of a significant division of Cappadocia, a status it still holds today.

KIRWAN, RICHARD (1733-1812), Irish scientist, was born at Cloughballymore, Co. Galway, in 1733. Part of his early life was spent abroad, and in 1754 he entered the Jesuit novitiate either at St Omer or at Hesdin, but returned to Ireland in the following year, when he succeeded to the family estates through the death of his brother in a duel. In 1766, having conformed to the established religion two years previously, he was called to the Irish bar, but in 1768 abandoned practice in favour of scientific pursuits. During the next nineteen years he resided chiefly in London, enjoying the society of the scientific men living there, and corresponding with many savants on the continent of Europe, as his wide knowledge of languages enabled him to do with ease. His experiments on the specific gravities and attractive powers of various saline substances formed a substantial contribution to the methods of analytical chemistry, and in 1782 gained him the Copley medal from the Royal Society, of which he was elected a fellow in 1780; and in 1784 he was engaged in a controversy with Cavendish in regard to the latter’s experiments on air. In 1787 he removed to Dublin, where four years later he became president of the Royal Irish Academy. To its proceedings he contributed some thirty-eight memoirs, dealing with meteorology, pure and applied chemistry, geology, magnetism, philology, &c. One of these, on the primitive state of the globe and its subsequent catastrophe, involved him in a lively dispute with the upholders of the Huttonian theory. His geological work was marred by an implicit belief in the universal deluge, and through finding fossils associated with the trap rocks near Portrush he maintained basalt was of aqueous origin. He was one of the last supporters in England of the phlogistic hypothesis, for which he contended in his Essay on Phlogiston and the Constitution of Acids (1787), identifying phlogiston with hydrogen. This work, translated by Madame Lavoisier, was published in French with critical notes by Lavoisier and some of his associates; Kirwan attempted to refute their arguments, but they proved too strong for him, and he acknowledged himself a convert in 1791. His other books included Elements of Mineralogy (1784), which was the first systematic work on that subject in the English language, and which long remained standard; An Estimate of the Temperature of Different Latitudes (1787); Essay of the Analysis of Mineral Waters (1799), and Geological Essays (1799). In his later years he turned to philosophical questions, producing a paper on human liberty in 1798, a treatise on logic in 1807, and a volume of metaphysical essays in 1811, none of any worth. Various stories are told of his eccentricities as well as of his conversational powers. He died in Dublin in June 1812.
KIRWAN, RICHARD (1733-1812), Irish scientist, was born in Cloughballymore, Co. Galway, in 1733. He spent part of his early life abroad, and in 1754 he joined the Jesuit novitiate at either St Omer or Hesdin, but returned to Ireland the following year when he inherited the family estates after his brother was killed in a duel. In 1766, having converted to the established religion two years earlier, he was called to the Irish bar, but in 1768 he left legal practice to focus on science. For the next nineteen years, he primarily lived in London, socializing with scientific figures there and corresponding with many scholars across Europe, thanks to his extensive language skills. His experiments on the specific gravities and attractive properties of various salts significantly contributed to the methods of analytical chemistry, earning him the Copley medal from the Royal Society in 1782, of which he became a fellow in 1780. In 1784, he was involved in a debate with Cavendish regarding Cavendish’s air experiments. In 1787, he moved to Dublin, and four years later he became president of the Royal Irish Academy. He contributed around thirty-eight papers to its proceedings, covering topics such as meteorology, pure and applied chemistry, geology, magnetism, linguistics, and more. One of these papers discussed the early state of the Earth and its later catastrophe, which led to a heated argument with proponents of the Huttonian theory. His geological work was affected by his strong belief in a worldwide flood, and upon discovering fossils alongside trap rocks near Portrush, he argued that basalt originated from water. He was among the last supporters of the phlogistic theory in England, defending it in his Essay on Phlogiston and the Constitution of Acids (1787), where he equated phlogiston with hydrogen. This work, translated by Madame Lavoisier, was published in French with critical notes from Lavoisier and some of his colleagues; Kirwan attempted to counter their arguments but found them too compelling, ultimately admitting his change of belief in 1791. His other works included Elements of Mineralogy (1784), the first systematic study on that subject in English, which remained a standard for many years; An Estimate of the Temperature of Different Latitudes (1787); Essay of the Analysis of Mineral Waters (1799); and Geological Essays (1799). In his later years, he shifted to philosophical inquiries, writing a paper on human liberty in 1798, a treatise on logic in 1807, and a collection of metaphysical essays in 1811, none of significant value. Various anecdotes exist about his eccentricities and conversational skills. He died in Dublin in June 1812.

KISFALUDY, KÁROLY [Charles] (1788-1830), Hungarian author, was born at Téte, near Raab, on the 6th of February 835 1788. His birth cost his mother her life and himself his father’s undying hatred. He entered the army as a cadet in 1804; saw active service in Italy, Servia and Bavaria (1805-1809), especially distinguishing himself at the battle of Leoben (May 25, 1809), and returned to his quarters at Pest with the rank of first lieutenant. It was during the war that he composed his first poems, e.g. the tragedy Gyilkos (“The Murder,” 1808), and numerous martial songs for the encouragement of his comrades. It was now, too, that he fell hopelessly in love with the beautiful Katalin Heppler, the daughter of a wealthy tobacco merchant. Tiring of the monotony of a soldier’s life, yet unwilling to sacrifice his liberty to follow commerce or enter the civil service, Kisfaludy, contrary to his father’s wishes, now threw up his commission and made his home at the house of a married sister at Vörröck, where he could follow his inclinations. In 1812 he studied painting at the Vienna academy and supported himself precariously by his brush and pencil, till the theatre at Vienna proved a still stronger attraction. In 1812 he wrote the tragedy Klára Zách, and in 1815 went to Italy to study art more thoroughly. But he was back again within six months, and for the next three years flitted from place to place, living on the charity of his friends, lodging in hovels and dashing off scores of daubs which rarely found a market. The united and repeated petitions of the whole Kisfaludy family failed to bring about a reconciliation between the elder Kisfaludy and his prodigal son. It was the success of his drama Ilka, written for the Fehérvár dramatic society, that first made him famous and prosperous. The play was greeted with enthusiasm both at Fehérvár and Buda (1819). Subsequent plays, The Voivode Stiber and The Petitioners (the first original Magyar dramas), were equally successful. Kisfaludy’s fame began to spread. He had found his true vocation as the creator of the Hungarian drama. In May 1820 he wrote three new plays for the dramatic society (he could always turn out a five-act drama in four days) which still further increased his reputation. From 1820 onwards, under the influence of the great critic Kazinczy, he learnt to polish and refine his style, while his friend and adviser György Gaal (who translated some of his dramas for the Vienna stage) introduced him to the works of Shakespeare and Goethe. By this time Kisfaludy had evolved a literary theory of his own which inclined towards romanticism; and in collaboration with his elder brother Alexander (see below) he founded the periodical Aurora (1822), which he edited to the day of his death. The Aurora was a notable phenomenon in Magyar literature. It attracted towards it many of the rising young authors of the day (including Vörösmarty, Bajza and Czuczor) and speedily became the oracle of the romanticists. Kisfaludy’s material position had now greatly improved, but he could not shake off his old recklessness and generosity, and he was never able to pay a tithe of his debts. The publication of Aurora so engrossed his time that practically he abandoned the stage. But he contributed to Aurora ballads, epigrams, short epic pieces, and, best of all, his comic stories. Kisfaludy was in fact the founder of the school of Magyar humorists and his comic types amuse and delight to this day. When the folk-tale became popular in Europe, Kisfaludy set to work upon folk-tales also and produced (1828) some of the masterpieces of that genre. He died on the 21st of November 1830. Six years later the great literary society of Hungary, the Kisfaludy Társaság, was founded to commemorate his genius. Apart from his own works it is the supreme merit of Kisfaludy to have revived and nationalized the Magyar literature, giving it a range and scope undreamed of before his time.
Kisfaludy, Károly [Charles] (1788-1830), Hungarian author, was born in Téte, near Raab, on February 6, 1788. His birth cost his mother her life and earned him his father's lifelong hatred. He joined the army as a cadet in 1804, served actively in Italy, Servia, and Bavaria (1805-1809), particularly standing out in the battle of Leoben on May 25, 1809, before returning to Pest as a first lieutenant. During the war, he wrote his first poems, such as the tragedy Gyilkos (“The Murder,” 1808), along with several martial songs to boost his comrades' morale. It was also during this time that he fell deeply in love with the beautiful Katalin Heppler, the daughter of a wealthy tobacco merchant. Fed up with the monotony of military life yet reluctant to trade his freedom for a job in commerce or the civil service, Kisfaludy, against his father's wishes, resigned his commission and moved in with a married sister in Vörröck, where he could pursue his passions. In 1812, he studied painting at the Vienna academy, making a precarious living through his art until the allure of the theatre in Vienna drew him in. In 1812, he wrote the tragedy Klára Zách, and in 1815, he went to Italy to study art more seriously. However, he returned within six months, and for the next three years, he moved from place to place, relying on friends for support while living in run-down accommodations and producing many paintings that rarely sold. The united and repeated requests from his whole family did not succeed in mending the rift between Kisfaludy and his estranged father. His fame and success began with the drama Ilka, written for the Fehérvár dramatic society, which was warmly received in Fehérvár and Buda in 1819. His subsequent plays, The Voivode Stiber and The Petitioners (the first original Hungarian dramas), were also successful. Kisfaludy's reputation grew as he found his true calling as a creator of Hungarian drama. In May 1820, he wrote three new plays for the dramatic society (he could always produce a five-act drama in four days), further enhancing his reputation. Starting in 1820, influenced by the great critic Kazinczy, he learned to refine his style, while his friend and advisor György Gaal (who translated some of his plays for the Vienna stage) introduced him to the works of Shakespeare and Goethe. By this time, Kisfaludy had developed his own literary theory leaning toward romanticism; alongside his older brother Alexander (see below), he established the periodical Aurora (1822), which he edited until his death. The Aurora became a notable element in Hungarian literature, attracting many emerging young writers (including Vörösmarty, Bajza, and Czuczor) and quickly becoming an authority for romanticism. Kisfaludy's financial situation improved significantly, but he couldn't shake his old carelessness and generosity and was never able to clear a fraction of his debts. The demands of publishing Aurora consumed most of his time, leading him to practically abandon the stage. However, he contributed ballads, epigrams, short epic pieces, and, most importantly, his comedic stories to Aurora. Kisfaludy was essentially the founder of the Hungarian humorist movement, and his comic characters continue to entertain today. When folk tales gained popularity in Europe, Kisfaludy started working on them too, producing some of the genre’s masterpieces in 1828. He died on November 21, 1830. Six years later, the significant literary society of Hungary, the Kisfaludy Társaság, was established in his honor. Beyond his own works, Kisfaludy's greatest achievement is that he rejuvenated and nationalized Hungarian literature, expanding its scope beyond what was thought possible before his era.
The first edition of Kisfaludy’s works, in 10 volumes, appeared at Buda in 1831, shortly after his death, but the 7th edition (Budapest 1893) is the best and fullest. See Ferenc Toldy, Lives of the Magyar Poets (Hung.) (Budapest, 1870); Zsolt Beöthy, The Father of Hungarian Comedy (Budapest, 1882); Tamás Szana, The Two Kisfaludys (Hung.) (Budapest, 1876). Kisfaludy’s struggles and adventures are also most vividly described in Jókai’s novel, Eppur si muove (Hung.).
The first edition of Kisfaludy's works, which has 10 volumes, was published in Buda in 1831, shortly after his death, but the 7th edition (Budapest 1893) is the most complete and comprehensive. Check out Ferenc Toldy, Lives of the Magyar Poets (Hung.) (Budapest, 1870); Zsolt Beöthy, The Father of Hungarian Comedy (Budapest, 1882); Tamás Szana, The Two Kisfaludys (Hung.) (Budapest, 1876). Kisfaludy's struggles and adventures are also vividly illustrated in Jókai's novel, Eppur si muove (Hung.).
Sándor [Alexander] Kisfaludy (1772-1844), Hungarian poet, elder brother of the preceding, was born at Zala on the 27th of September 1772, educated at Raab, and graduated in philosophy and jurisprudence at Pressburg. He early fell under the influence of Schiller and Kleist, and devoted himself to the resuscitation of the almost extinct Hungarian literature. Disgusted with his profession, the law, he entered the Life Guards (1793) and plunged into the gay life of Vienna, cultivating literature, learning French, German and Italian, painting, sketching, assiduously frequenting the theatre, and consorting on equal terms with all the literary celebrities of the Austrian capital. In 1796 he was transferred to the army in Italy for being concerned with some of his brother officers of the Vienna garrison in certain irregularities. When Milan was captured by Napoleon Kisfaludy was sent a prisoner of war to Vaucluse, where he studied Petrarch with enthusiasm and fell violently in love with Caroline D’Esclapon, a kindred spirit to whom he addressed his melancholy Himfy Lays, the first part of the subsequently famous sonnets. On returning to Austria he served with some distinction in the campaigns of 1798 and 1799 on the Rhine and in Switzerland; but tiring of a military life and disgusted at the slowness of his promotion, he quitted the army in September 1799, and married his old love Rózá Szegedy at the beginning of 1800. The first five happy years of their life were passed at Kám in Vás county, but in 1805 they removed to Sümeg where Kisfaludy gave himself up entirely to literature.
Sándor Kisfaludy (1772-1844), a Hungarian poet and the elder brother of the previous one, was born in Zala on September 27, 1772. He was educated in Raab and graduated in philosophy and law in Pressburg. He quickly came under the influence of Schiller and Kleist, dedicating himself to reviving the nearly extinct Hungarian literature. Disillusioned with his career in law, he joined the Life Guards in 1793 and immersed himself in the vibrant life of Vienna, engaging in literature, learning French, German, and Italian, painting, sketching, regularly attending the theater, and mingling with all the literary celebrities of the Austrian capital. In 1796, he was transferred to the army in Italy after being involved in some irregularities with his fellow officers from the Vienna garrison. When Napoleon captured Milan, Kisfaludy was taken as a prisoner of war to Vaucluse, where he enthusiastically studied Petrarch and fell deeply in love with Caroline D’Esclapon, a kindred spirit to whom he wrote his melancholic Himfy Lays, the first part of the later famous sonnets. Upon returning to Austria, he served with distinction in the campaigns of 1798 and 1799 along the Rhine and in Switzerland; however, growing tired of military life and frustrated with the slow pace of his promotion, he left the army in September 1799 and married his old love Rózá Szegedy at the beginning of 1800. The first five happy years of their life were spent in Kám in Vás county, but in 1805 they moved to Sümeg, where Kisfaludy devoted himself entirely to literature.
At the beginning of the 19th century he had published a volume of erotics which made him famous, and his reputation was still further increased by his Regék or Tales. During the troublous times of 1809, when the gentry of Zala county founded a confederation, the palatine appointed Kisfaludy one of his adjutants. Subsequently, by command, he wrote an account of the movement for presentation to King Francis, which was committed to the secret archives, and Kisfaludy was forbidden to communicate its contents. In 1820 the Marczebánya Institute crowned his Tales and the palatine presented him with a prize of 400 florins in the hall of the Pest county council. In 1822 he started the Aurora with his younger brother Károly (see above). When the academy was founded in 1830 Kisfaludy was the first county member elected to it. In 1835 he resigned because he was obliged to share the honour of winning the academy’s grand prize with Vörösmarty. After the death of his first wife (1832) he married a second time, but by neither of his wives had he any child. The remainder of his days were spent in his Tusculum among the vineyards of Sümeg and Somla. He died on the 28th of October 1844. Alexander Kisfaludy stands alone among the rising literary schools of his day. He was not even influenced by his friend the great critic Kazinczy, who gave the tone to the young classical writers of his day. Kisfaludy’s art was self-taught, solitary and absolutely independent. If he imitated any one it was Petrarch; indeed his famous Himfy szerelmei (“The Loves of Himfy”), as his collected sonnets are called, have won for him the title of “The Hungarian Petrarch.” But the passion of Kisfaludy is far more sincere and real than ever Petrarch’s was, and he completely Magyarized everything he borrowed. After finishing the sonnets Kisfaludy devoted himself to more objective writing, as in the incomparable Regék, which reproduce the scenery and the history of the delightful counties which surround Lake Balaton. He also contributed numerous tales and other pieces to Aurora. Far less successful were his plays, of which Hunyádi János (1816), by far the longest drama in the Hungarian language, need alone be mentioned.
At the start of the 19th century, he published a collection of erotic writings that made him well-known, and his reputation grew even more with his Regék or Tales. During the turbulent times of 1809, when the gentry of Zala County formed a confederation, the palatine appointed Kisfaludy as one of his assistants. Later, he was instructed to write a report on the movement for presentation to King Francis, which was put into the secret archives, and Kisfaludy was forbidden to share its contents. In 1820, the Marczebánya Institute honored his Tales and the palatine awarded him a prize of 400 florins in the Pest County Council hall. In 1822, he co-founded the Aurora with his younger brother Károly (see above). When the academy was established in 1830, Kisfaludy was the first county member elected. In 1835, he stepped down as he had to share the honor of winning the academy's grand prize with Vörösmarty. After his first wife passed away in 1832, he remarried, but he had no children with either wife. He spent his remaining days in his Tusculum among the vineyards of Sümeg and Somla. He died on October 28, 1844. Alexander Kisfaludy stands out among the emerging literary movements of his time. He wasn't influenced by his friend, the great critic Kazinczy, who set the tone for the young classical writers of his era. Kisfaludy’s artistry was self-taught, solitary, and entirely independent. If he drew inspiration from anyone, it was Petrarch; indeed, his well-known Himfy szerelmei (“The Loves of Himfy”), as his collected sonnets are called, earned him the title of “The Hungarian Petrarch.” However, Kisfaludy's passion is much more genuine and authentic than Petrarch's ever was, and he fully adapted everything he borrowed to Hungarian culture. After completing the sonnets, Kisfaludy focused on more objective writing, as seen in the remarkable Regék that depict the scenery and history of the charming counties around Lake Balaton. He also contributed many tales and other works to Aurora. His plays were significantly less successful, with Hunyádi János (1816), the longest drama in the Hungarian language, being notably mentioned.
The best critical edition of Sándor Kisfaludy’s works is the fourth complete edition, by David Angyal, in eight volumes (Budapest, 1893). See Tamás Szana, The two Kisfaludys (Hung.) (Budapest, 1876); Imre Sándor, The Influence of the Italian on the Hungarian Literature (Hung.) (Budapest, 1878); Kálmán Sümegi, Kisfaludy and his Tales (Hung.) (Budapest, 1877).
The best critical edition of Sándor Kisfaludy’s works is the fourth complete edition, edited by David Angyal, in eight volumes (Budapest, 1893). See Tamás Szana, The Two Kisfaludys (Hung.) (Budapest, 1876); Imre Sándor, The Influence of the Italian on Hungarian Literature (Hung.) (Budapest, 1878); Kálmán Sümegi, Kisfaludy and His Tales (Hung.) (Budapest, 1877).

KĪSH, or Kais (the first form is Persian and the second Arabic), an island in the Persian Gulf. It is mentioned in the 12th century as being the residence of an Arab pirate from Oman, who exacted a tribute from the pearl fisheries of the gulf and had the title of “King of the Sea,” and it rose to importance in the 836 13th century with the fall of Siraf as a transit station of the trade between India and the West. In the 14th century it was supplanted by Hormuz and lapsed into its former insignificance. The island is nearly 10 m. long and 5 m. broad, and contains a number of small villages, the largest, Mashi, with about 100 houses, being situated on its north-eastern corner in 26° 34′ N. and 54° 2′ E. The highest part of the island has an elevation of 120 ft. The inhabitants are Arabs, and nearly all pearl fishers, possessing many boats, which they take to the pearl banks on the Arabian coast. The water supply is scanty and there is little vegetation, but sufficient for sustaining some flocks of sheep and goats and some cattle. Near the centre of the north coast are the ruins of the old city, now known as Harira, with remains of a mosque, with octagonal columns, masonry, water-cisterns (two 150 ft. long, 40 ft. broad, 24 ft. deep) and a fine underground canal, or aqueduct, half a mile long and cut in the solid rock 20 ft. below the surface. Fragments of glazed tiles and brown and blue pottery, of thin white and blue Chinese porcelain, of green céladon (some with white scroll-work or figures in relief), glass beads, bangles, &c., are abundant. Kīsh is the Kataia of Arrian; Chisi and Quis of Marco Polo; Quixi, Queis, Caez, Cais, &c., of Portuguese writers; and Khenn, or Kenn, of English.
KĪSH,__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ or Kais (the first name is Persian and the second is Arabic) is an island in the Persian Gulf. In the 12th century, it was noted as the home of an Arab pirate from Oman, who demanded a tribute from the pearl fisheries in the gulf and held the title “King of the Sea.” It gained significance in the 836 13th century as a transit point for trade between India and the West, but its importance faded in the 14th century when Hormuz took over, leading it to return to obscurity. The island is almost 10 meters long and 5 meters wide, featuring several small villages, with the largest, Mashi, located on its northeastern corner at 26° 34′ N and 54° 2′ E. The highest point of the island rises to 120 feet. The residents are primarily Arabs and most work in pearl fishing, owning many boats that they use to access the pearl banks along the Arabian coast. Water is scarce and vegetation is limited, but enough exists to support some flocks of sheep and goats, as well as a few cattle. Close to the center of the north coast are the ruins of the old city, now called Harira, which include remnants of a mosque with octagonal columns, masonry, and water cisterns (two sized 150 ft. long, 40 ft. wide, and 24 ft. deep), along with a remarkable underground canal or aqueduct that stretches half a mile and is carved into solid rock, situated 20 ft. beneath the surface. Numerous artifacts like glazed tiles, brown and blue pottery, thin white and blue Chinese porcelain, green céladon (some with white scroll-work or figures in relief), and glass beads and bangles can be found there. Kīsh is known as Kataia in Arrian’s writings; Chisi and Quis in Marco Polo’s accounts; Quixi, Queis, Caez, Cais, etc., in Portuguese texts; and Khenn, or Kenn, in English references.

KISHANGARH, a native state of India, in the Rajputana agency. Area, 858 sq. m.; pop. (1901), 90,970, showing a decrease of 27% in the decade, due to the famine of 1899-1900; estimated revenue, £34,000; there is no tribute. The state was founded in the reign of the emperor Akbar, by a younger son of the raja of Jodhpur. In 1818 Kishangarh first came into direct relations with the British government, by entering into a treaty, together with the other Rajput states, for the suppression of the Pindari marauders by whom the country was at that time overrun. The chief, whose title is maharaja, is a Rajput of the Rathor clan. Maharaja Madan Singh ascended the throne in 1900 at the age of sixteen, and attended the Delhi Durbar of 1903 as a cadet in the Imperial Cadet Corps. The administration, under the diwan, is highly spoken of. Irrigation from tanks and wells has been extended; factories for ginning and pressing cotton have been started; and the social reform movement, for discouraging excessive expenditure on marriages, has been very successful. The state is traversed by the Rajputana railway. The town of Kishangarh is 18 m. N.W. of Ajmere by rail. Pop. (1901), 12,663. It is the residence of many Jain merchants.
Kishangarh, is a native state in India, part of the Rajputana agency. It has an area of 858 sq. m. and a population of 90,970 in 1901, which shows a 27% decrease from the previous decade due to the famine of 1899-1900. The estimated revenue is £34,000, with no tribute paid. The state was established during the reign of Emperor Akbar by a younger son of the raja of Jodhpur. In 1818, Kishangarh first established direct relations with the British government by signing a treaty, along with other Rajput states, to suppress the Pindari marauders who were overrunning the territory at that time. The chief, titled maharaja, is a Rajput from the Rathor clan. Maharaja Madan Singh ascended to the throne in 1900 at the age of sixteen and attended the Delhi Durbar of 1903 as a cadet in the Imperial Cadet Corps. The administration, led by the diwan, has received high praise. Irrigation from tanks and wells has improved; factories for ginning and pressing cotton have been established; and the social reform movement aimed at reducing excessive spending on marriages has been quite successful. The state is connected by the Rajputana railway, with the town of Kishangarh located 18 miles northwest of Ajmere by rail. The population in 1901 was 12,663, and the town is home to many Jain merchants.

KISHINEV (Kishlanow of the Moldavians), a town of south-west Russia, capital of the government of Bessarabia, situated on the right bank of the Byk, a tributary of the Dniester, and on the railway between Odessa and Jassy in Rumania, 120 m. W.N.W. from the former. At the beginning of the 19th century it was but a poor village, and in 1812 when it was acquired by Russia from Moldavia it had only 7000 inhabitants; twenty years later its population numbered 35,000, while in 1862 it had with its suburbs 92,000 inhabitants, and in 1900 125,787, composed of the most varied nationalities—Moldavians, Walachians, Russians, Jews (43%), Bulgarians, Tatars, Germans and Gypsies. A massacre (pogrom) of the Jews was perpetrated here in 1903. The town consists of two parts—the old or lower town, on the banks of the Byk, and the new or upper town, situated on high crags, 450 to 500 ft. above the river. The wide suburbs are remarkable for their gardens, which produce great quantities of fruits (especially plums, which are dried and exported), tobacco, mulberry leaves for silkworms, and wine. The buildings of the town are sombre, shabby and low, but built of stone; and the streets, though wide and shaded by acacias, are mostly unpaved. Kishinev is the seat of the archbishop of Bessarabia, and has a cathedral, an ecclesiastical seminary with 800 students, a college, and a gardening school, a museum, a public library, a botanic garden, and a sanatorium with sulphur springs. The town is adorned with statues of Tsar Alexander II. (1886) and the poet Pushkin (1885). There are tallow-melting houses, steam flour-mills, candle and soap works, distilleries and tobacco factories. The trade is very active and increasing, Kishinev being a centre for the Bessarabian trade in grain, wine, tobacco, tallow, wool and skins, exported to Austria and to Odessa. The town played an important part in the war between Russia and Turkey in 1877-78, as the chief centre of the Russian invasion.
KISHINEV (Kishlanow of the Moldavians), a town in south-west Russia, is the capital of Bessarabia. It's located on the right bank of the Byk, a tributary of the Dniester, and along the railway connecting Odessa and Jassy in Romania, 120 miles west-northwest of Odessa. At the start of the 19th century, it was just a poor village, and in 1812, when Russia took control from Moldavia, it had only 7,000 residents. Twenty years later, the population grew to 35,000; by 1862, including suburbs, it reached 92,000, and by 1900, it had 125,787 people from various nationalities—Moldavians, Walachians, Russians, Jews (43%), Bulgarians, Tatars, Germans, and Gypsies. A massacre (pogrom) against the Jewish community occurred here in 1903. The town is divided into two parts: the old or lower town by the banks of the Byk, and the new or upper town, which sits on high cliffs 450 to 500 feet above the river. The extensive suburbs are known for their gardens, which produce large quantities of fruit (especially plums, which are dried and exported), tobacco, mulberry leaves for silkworms, and wine. The buildings in the town are dull, shabby, and low, but they are made of stone; the streets, although wide and lined with acacias, are mostly unpaved. Kishinev is the seat of the archbishop of Bessarabia and features a cathedral, an ecclesiastical seminary with 800 students, a college, a gardening school, a museum, a public library, a botanical garden, and a sanatorium with sulfur springs. The town is adorned with statues of Tsar Alexander II. (1886) and the poet Pushkin (1885). There are tallow-melting plants, steam flour mills, candle and soap factories, distilleries, and tobacco factories. The trade is quite vibrant and growing, with Kishinev being a hub for Bessarabia's trade in grain, wine, tobacco, tallow, wool, and hides, which are exported to Austria and Odessa. The town played a significant role during the war between Russia and Turkey in 1877-78 as the primary base for the Russian invasion.

KISHM (also Arab. Jazīrat ut-tawīlah, Pers. Jazarīh i darāz, i.e. Long Island), an island at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, separated from the Persian mainland by the Khor-i-Jafari, a strait which at its narrowest point is less than 2 m. broad. On British Admiralty charts it figures as “Clarence Strait,” the name given to it by British surveyors in 1828 in honour of the duke of Clarence (William IV.). The island is 70 m. long, its main axis running E.N.E. by W.S.W. Its greatest breadth is 22 m. and the mean breadth about 7 m. A range of hills from 300 to 600 ft. high, with strongly marked escarpments, runs nearly parallel to the southern coast; they are largely composed, like those of Hormuz and the neighbouring mainland, of rock salt, which is regularly quarried in several places, principally at Nimakdan (i.e. salt-cellar) and Salakh on the south coast, and forms one of the chief products of the island, finding its way to Muscat, India and Zanzibar. In the centre of the island some hills, consisting of sandstone and marl, rise to an elevation of 1300 ft. In its general aspect the island is parched and barren-looking, like the south of Persia, but it contains fertile portions, which produce grain, dates, grapes, melons, &c. Traces of naphtha were observed near Salakh, but extensive boring operations in 1892 did not lead to any result. The town of Kishm (pop. 5000) is on the eastern extremity of the island. The famous navigator, William Baffin, was killed here in January 1622 by a shot from the Portuguese castle close by, which a British force was then besieging. Lafit (Laft, Leit), the next place in importance (reduced by a British fleet in 1809), is situated about midway on the northern coast in the most fertile part of the island. There are also many flourishing villages. At Basidu or Bassadore (correct name Baba Sa’idu), on the western extremity of the island, the British government maintained until 1879 a sanatorium for the crews of their gunboats in the gulf, with barracks for a company of sepoys belonging to the marine battalion at Bombay, workshops, hospital, &c. The village is still British property, but its occupants are reduced to a couple of men in charge of a coal depot, a provision store and about 90 villagers. In December 1896 a terrible earthquake destroyed about four-fifths of the houses on the island and over 1000 persons lost their lives. The total population is generally estimated at about 15,000 to 20,000, but the German Admiralty’s Segelhandbuch für den Persischen Golf for 1907 has 40,000.
KISHM (also Arabic Jazīrat ut-tawīlah, Persian Jazarīh i darāz, i.e. Long Island), is an island at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, separated from the Persian mainland by the Khor-i-Jafari, a strait that at its narrowest point is less than 2 meters wide. On British Admiralty charts, it's referred to as “Clarence Strait,” a name given by British surveyors in 1828 in honor of the Duke of Clarence (William IV). The island is 70 meters long, with its main axis running E.N.E. to W.S.W. Its widest point is 22 meters, and the average width is about 7 meters. A range of hills, between 300 and 600 feet high, with sharply defined cliffs, runs nearly parallel to the southern coast; these hills are primarily made up of rock salt, similar to those on Hormuz and the nearby mainland, which is regularly quarried in several locations, mainly at Nimakdan (i.e. salt-cellar) and Salakh on the south coast, and constitutes one of the island's major products, exported to Muscat, India, and Zanzibar. In the center of the island, some hills made of sandstone and marl rise to an elevation of 1,300 feet. Overall, the island appears dry and barren, like southern Persia, but it has fertile areas producing grains, dates, grapes, melons, etc. Traces of naphtha were found near Sal
Kishm is the ancient Oaracta, or Uorochta, a name said to have survived until recently in a village called Brokt, or Brokht. It was also called the island of the Beni Kavan, from an Arab tribe of that name which came from Oman.
Kishm is the ancient Oaracta or Uorochta, a name believed to have lasted until recently in a village called Brokt or Brokht. It was also known as the island of the Beni Kavan, named after an Arab tribe from Oman.

KISKUNFÉLEGYHÁZA, a town of Hungary, in the county of Pest-Pilis-Solt-Kiskun, 80 m. S.S.E. of Budapest by rail. Pop. (1900), 33,242. Among the principal buildings are a fine town hall, a Roman Catholic gymnasium and a modern large parish church. The surrounding country is covered with vineyards, fruit gardens, and tobacco and corn fields. The town itself, which is an important railway junction, is chiefly noted for its great cattle-market. Numerous Roman urns and other ancient relics have been dug up in the vicinity. In the 17th century the town was completely destroyed by the Turks, and it was not recolonized and rebuilt till 1743.
Kiskunfélegyháza, is a town in Hungary, located in the Pest-Pilis-Solt-Kiskun county, 80 km southeast of Budapest by train. Population (1900): 33,242. Key buildings include a beautiful town hall, a Roman Catholic gymnasium, and a large modern parish church. The surrounding area is filled with vineyards, fruit orchards, and fields of tobacco and corn. The town, which is an important railway hub, is especially known for its large cattle market. Many Roman urns and other historical artifacts have been found nearby. In the 17th century, the town was completely destroyed by the Turks, and it wasn't recolonized and rebuilt until 1743.

KISLOVODSK, a town and health-resort of Russian Caucasia, in the province of Terek, situated at an altitude of 2690 ft., in a deep caldron-shaped valley on the N. side of the Caucasus, 40 m. by rail S.W. of Pyatigorsk. Pop. (1897), 4078. The limestone hills which surround the town rise by successive steps or terraces, and contain numerous caves. The mineral waters are strongly impregnated with carbonic acid gas and have a temperature of 51° F. The principal spring is known as Narsan, and its water is called by the Circassians the “drink of heroes.”
Kislovodsk, is a town and health resort in the Russian Caucasus, located in Terek Province at an elevation of 2,690 feet, in a deep bowl-shaped valley on the north side of the Caucasus Mountains, 40 miles by train southwest of Pyatigorsk. The population (in 1897) was 4,078. The limestone hills surrounding the town rise in a series of steps or terraces and feature many caves. The mineral waters are heavily infused with carbon dioxide and have a temperature of 51°F. The main spring is called Narsan, and the Circassians refer to its water as the “drink of heroes.”


KISS, the act of pressing or touching with the lips, cheek, hand or lips of another, as a sign or expression of love, affection, reverence or greeting. Skeat (Etym. Dict., 1898) connects the Teut. base kussa with Lat. gustus, taste, and with Goth. kustus, test, from kinsan, to choose, and takes “kiss” as ultimately a doublet of “choice.”
KISS, the act of pressing or touching with the lips, cheek, hand, or the lips of another person, as a sign or expression of love, affection, respect, or greeting. Skeat (Etym. Dict., 1898) connects the Germanic root kussa with Latin gustus, meaning taste, and with Gothic kustus, meaning test, from kinsan, to choose, and interprets “kiss” as ultimately being a variation of “choice.”
For the liturgical osculum pacis or “kiss of peace,” see Pax. See further C. Nyrop, The Kiss and its History, trans. by W. F. Harvey (1902); J. J. Claudius, Dissertatio de salulationibus veterum (Utrecht, 1702); and “Baisers d’étiquette” (1689) in Archives curieuses de l’histoire de France (1834-1890, series ii. tom. 12).
For the liturgical osculum pacis or “kiss of peace,” refer to Pax. Additionally, see C. Nyrop, The Kiss and its History, translated by W. F. Harvey (1902); J. J. Claudius, Dissertatio de salulationibus veterum (Utrecht, 1702); and “Baisers d’étiquette” (1689) in Archives curieuses de l’histoire de France (1834-1890, series ii. tom. 12).

KISSAR, or Gytarah Barbaryeh, the ancient Nubian lyre, still in use in Egypt and Abyssinia. It consists of a body having instead of the traditional tortoiseshell back a shallow, round bowl of wood, covered with a sound-board of sheepskin, in which are three small round sound-holes. The arms, set through the sound-board at points distant about the third of the diameter from the circumference, have the familiar fan shape. Five gut strings, knotted round the bar and raised from the sound-board by means of a bridge tailpiece similar to that in use on the modern guitar, are plucked by means of a plectrum by the right hand for the melody, while the left hand sometimes twangs some of the strings as a soft drone accompaniment.
KISSAR, or Gytarah Barbaryeh, the ancient Nubian lyre, is still played in Egypt and Abyssinia. It has a body that features a shallow, round wooden bowl instead of the traditional tortoiseshell back, covered with a sheepskin soundboard, which includes three small round sound holes. The arms are passed through the soundboard about a third of the way from the edge, forming a familiar fan shape. Five gut strings are tied around a bar and lifted from the soundboard using a bridge tailpiece like that of a modern guitar. The strings are plucked by the right hand for the melody, while the left hand may occasionally twang some of the strings to create a soft drone accompaniment.

KISSINGEN, a town and watering-place of Germany, in the kingdom of Bavaria, delightfully situated in a broad valley surrounded by high and well-wooded hills, on the Franconian Saale, 656 ft. above sea-level, 62 m. E. of Frankfort-on-Main, and 43 N.E. of Würzburg by rail. Pop. (1900), 4757. Its streets are regular and its houses attractive. It has an Evangelical, an English, a Russian and three Roman Catholic churches, a theatre, and various benevolent institutions, besides all the usual buildings for the lodging, cure and amusement of the numerous visitors who are attracted to this, the most popular watering-place in Bavaria. In the Kurgarten, a tree-shaded expanse between the Kurhaus and the handsome colonnaded Konversations-Saal, are the three principal springs, the Rákóczy, the Pandur and the Maxbrunnen, of which the first two, strongly impregnated with iron and salt, have a temperature of 51.26° F.; the last (50.72°) is like Selters or Seltzer water. At short distances from the town are the intermittent artesian spring Solensprudel, the Schönbornsprudel and the Theresienquelle; and in the same valley as Kissingen are the minor spas of Bocklet and Brückenau. The waters of Kissingen are prescribed for both internal and external use in a great variety of diseases. They are all highly charged with salt, and productive government salt-works were at one time stationed near Kissingen. The number of persons who visit the place amounts to about 20,000 a year. The manufactures of the town, chiefly carriages and furniture, are unimportant; there is also a trade in fruit and wine.
Kissingen, is a town and spa in Germany, located in Bavaria. It's beautifully situated in a wide valley surrounded by tall, wooded hills, along the Franconian Saale River, 656 feet above sea level, 62 miles east of Frankfurt and 43 miles northeast of Würzburg by train. The population was 4,757 in 1900. The streets are well-organized, and the houses are charming. There are several churches, including one Evangelical, one English, one Russian, and three Roman Catholic, along with a theater and various charitable institutions, plus all the usual facilities for accommodating, treating, and entertaining the many visitors drawn to this popular spa in Bavaria. In the Kurgarten, a tree-covered area between the Kurhaus and the beautiful colonnaded Konversations-Saal, you'll find the three main springs: the Rákóczy, the Pandur, and the Maxbrunnen. The first two springs are rich in iron and salt, with a temperature of 51.26°F, while the last one (50.72°F) is similar to Selters or Seltzer water. Just a short distance from the town are the intermittent artesian spring Solensprudel, the Schönbornsprudel, and the Theresienquelle; also nearby in the same valley are the smaller spas of Bocklet and Brückenau. The waters of Kissingen are used both internally and externally to treat a wide range of ailments. They are all heavily salted, and at one time, there were productive government salt works located near Kissingen. Approximately 20,000 people visit the town each year. The local industries, mainly focused on carriages and furniture, are not significant, and there is also some trade in fruit and wine.
The salt springs were known in the 9th century, and their medicinal properties were recognized in the 16th, but it was only during the 19th century that Kissingen became a popular resort. The town belonged to the counts of Henneberg until 1394, when it was sold to the bishop of Würzburg. With this bishopric it passed later to Bavaria. On the 10th of July 1866 the Prussians defeated the Bavarians with great slaughter near Kissingen. On the 13th of July 1874 the town was the scene of the attempt of the fanatic Kullmann to assassinate Prince Bismarck, to whom a statue has been erected. There are also monuments to Kings Louis I. and Maximilian I. of Bavaria.
The salt springs were known in the 9th century, and their medicinal properties were recognized in the 16th, but it was only in the 19th century that Kissingen became a popular resort. The town belonged to the counts of Henneberg until 1394, when it was sold to the bishop of Würzburg. Later, it became part of Bavaria. On July 10, 1866, the Prussians defeated the Bavarians with heavy losses near Kissingen. On July 13, 1874, the town was the site of the failed assassination attempt by the fanatic Kullmann on Prince Bismarck, to whom a statue has been dedicated. There are also monuments to Kings Louis I and Maximilian I of Bavaria.
See Balling, Die Heilquellen und Bäder zu Kissingen (Kissingen, 1886); A. Sotier, Bad Kissingen (Leipzig, 1883); Werner, Bad Kissingen als Kurort (Berlin, 1904); Leusser, Kissingen für Herzkranke (Würzburg, 1902); Diruf, Kissingen und seine Heilquellen (Würzburg, 1892); and Roth, Bad Kissingen (Würzburg, 1901).
See Balling, The Healing Springs and Baths of Kissingen (Kissingen, 1886); A. Sotier, Bad Kissingen (Leipzig, 1883); Werner, Bad Kissingen as a Health Resort (Berlin, 1904); Leusser, Kissingen for Heart Patients (Würzburg, 1902); Diruf, Kissingen and Its Healing Springs (Würzburg, 1892); and Roth, Bad Kissingen (Würzburg, 1901).

KISTNA, or Krishna, a large river of southern India. It rises near the Bombay sanatorium of Mahabaleshwar in the Western Ghats, only about 40 m. from the Arabian Sea, and, as it discharges into the Bay of Bengal, it thus flows across almost the entire peninsula from west to east. It has an estimated basin area of 97,000 sq. m., and its length is 800 m. Its source is held sacred, and is frequented by pilgrims in large numbers. From Mahabaleshwar the Kistna runs southward in a rapid course into the nizam’s dominions, then turns to the east, and ultimately falls into the sea by two principal mouths, carrying with it the waters of the Bhima from the north and the Tungabadhra from the south-west. Along this part of the coast runs an extensive strip of land which has been entirely formed by the detritus washed down by the Kistna and Godavari. The river channel is throughout too rocky and the stream too rapid to allow navigation even by small native craft. In utility for irrigation the Kistna is also inferior to its two sister streams, the Godavari and Cauvery. By far the greatest of its irrigation works is the Bezwada anicut, begun by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1852. Bezwada is a small town at the entrance of the gorge by which the Kistna bursts through the Eastern Ghats and immediately spreads over the alluvial plain. The channel there is 1300 yds. wide. During the dry season the depth of water is barely 6 ft., but sometimes it rises to as much as 36 ft., the maximum flood discharge being calculated at 1,188,000 cub. ft. per second. Of the two main canals connected with the dam, that on the left bank breaks into two branches, the one running 39 m. to Ellore, the other 49 m. to Masulipatam. The canal on the right bank proceeds nearly parallel to the river, and also sends off two principal branches, to Nizampatam and Comamur. The total length of the main channels is 372 m. and the total area irrigated in 1903-1904 was about 700,000 acres.
KISTNA, or Krishna, is a major river in southern India. It originates near the Bombay sanatorium of Mahabaleshwar in the Western Ghats, just about 40 m from the Arabian Sea, and flows eastward into the Bay of Bengal, traversing almost the entire peninsula. Its estimated basin area is 97,000 sq m, and it stretches for 800 m. Its source is considered sacred and attracts large numbers of pilgrims. From Mahabaleshwar, the Kistna flows south at a swift pace into the nizam’s territory, then veers eastward and eventually empties into the sea through two main mouths, carrying waters from the Bhima to the north and the Tungabadhra to the southwest. This coastline features a broad strip of land formed entirely by sediment washed down by the Kistna and Godavari. The river channel is largely too rocky and the current too fast for navigation, even by small local boats. In terms of irrigation utility, the Kistna is also less effective than its two counterparts, the Godavari and Cauvery. The most significant irrigation project is the Bezwada anicut, which began under Sir Arthur Cotton in 1852. Bezwada is a small town at the mouth of the gorge where the Kistna flows through the Eastern Ghats and spreads onto the alluvial plain. The channel there is 1300 yds wide. During the dry season, the water depth is barely 6 ft., but can sometimes rise to as much as 36 ft., with the peak flood discharge estimated at 1,188,000 cub ft per second. Of the two main canals linked to the dam, the one on the left bank splits into two branches, one extending 39 m to Ellore and the other 49 m to Masulipatam. The canal on the right bank runs nearly parallel to the river and also branches into two main routes, heading to Nizampatam and Comamur. The total length of the main channels is 372 m, and in 1903-1904, the total area irrigated was about 700,000 acres.

KISTNA (or Krishna), a district of British India, in the N.E. of the Madras Presidency. Masulipatam is the district headquarters. Area, 8490 sq. m. The district is generally a flat country, but the interior is broken by a few low hills, the highest being 1857 ft. above sea-level. The principal rivers are the Kistna, which cuts the district into two portions, and the Munyeru, Paleru and Naguleru (tributaries of the Gundlakamma and the Kistna); the last only is navigable. The Kolar lake, which covers an area of 21 by 14 m., and the Romparu swamp are natural receptacles for the drainage on the north and south sides of the Kistna respectively.
KISTNA (or Krishna) is a district in British India, located in the northeast of the Madras Presidency. Masulipatam serves as the district headquarters. It covers an area of 8490 square miles. The district is mostly flat, but the interior features a few low hills, the tallest being 1857 feet above sea level. The main rivers are the Kistna, which splits the district into two parts, and the Munyeru, Paleru, and Naguleru (which are tributaries of the Gundlakamma and the Kistna); only the Naguleru is navigable. Kolar Lake, which spans an area of 21 by 14 miles, along with the Romparu swamp, acts as natural drainage sites on the north and south sides of the Kistna respectively.
In 1901 the population was 2,154,803, showing an increase of 16% in the decade. Subsequently the area of the district was reduced by the formation of the new district of Guntur (q.v.), though Kistna received an accretion of territory from Godavari district. The population in 1901 on the area as reconstituted (5899 sq. m.) was 1,744,138. The Kistna delta system of irrigation canals, which are available also for navigation, connect with the Godavari system. The principal crops are rice, millets, pulse, oil-seeds, cotton, indigo, tobacco and a little sugar-cane. There are several factories for ginning and pressing cotton. The cigars known in England as Lunkas are partly made from tobacco grown on lankas or islands in the Kistna. The manufacture of chintzes at Masulipatam is a decaying industry, but cotton is woven everywhere for domestic use. Salt is evaporated, under government supervision, along the coast. Bezwada, at the head of the delta, is a place of growing importance, as the central junction of the East Coast railway system, which crosses the inland portion of the district in three directions. Some seaborne trade, chiefly coasting, is carried on at the open roadsteads of Masulipatam and Nizampatam, both in the delta. The Church Missionary Society supports a college at Masulipatam.
In 1901, the population was 2,154,803, reflecting a 16% increase over the decade. The district's area was later reduced when the new Guntur district was created (q.v.), although Kistna gained some territory from the Godavari district. The population in 1901 for the redefined area (5,899 sq. m.) was 1,744,138. The Kistna delta irrigation canal system, which also serves for navigation, connects with the Godavari system. The main crops are rice, millets, pulses, oilseeds, cotton, indigo, tobacco, and a bit of sugarcane. There are several factories for ginning and pressing cotton. The cigars referred to in England as Lunkas are partly made from tobacco grown on lankas or islands in the Kistna. The production of chintzes in Masulipatam is a declining industry, but cotton is woven everywhere for local use. Salt is evaporated under government oversight along the coast. Bezwada, located at the head of the delta, is becoming increasingly important as the main hub of the East Coast railway system, which crosses the inland part of the district in three directions. Some coastal trade occurs at the open roadsteads of Masulipatam and Nizampatam, both situated in the delta. The Church Missionary Society maintains a college in Masulipatam.
The early history of Kistna is inseparable from that of the northern Circars. Dharanikota and the adjacent town of Amravati were the seats of early Hindu and Buddhist governments; and the more modern Rajahmundry owed its importance to later dynasties. The Chalukyas here gave place to the Cholas, who in turn were ousted by the Reddi kings, who flourished during the 14th century, and built the forts of Bellamkonda, Kondavi and Kondapalli in the north of the district, while the Gajapati dynasty of Orissa ruled in the north. Afterwards the entire district passed to the Kutb Shahis of Golconda, until annexed to the Mogul empire by Aurangzeb in 1687. Meantime the English had in 1611 established a small factory at Masulipatam, where they traded with varying fortune from 1759, when, 838 Masulipatam being captured from the French by Colonel Forde, with a force sent by Lord Clive from Calcutta, the power of the English in the greater part of the district was complete.
The early history of Kistna is closely linked with that of the northern Circars. Dharanikota and the nearby town of Amravati were the centers of early Hindu and Buddhist governments, while the more modern Rajahmundry gained its significance from later dynasties. The Chalukyas were succeeded by the Cholas, who were eventually replaced by the Reddi kings, who thrived during the 14th century and built the forts of Bellamkonda, Kondavi, and Kondapalli in the northern part of the district, while the Gajapati dynasty of Orissa ruled to the north. Afterwards, the entire district came under the control of the Kutb Shahis of Golconda, until it was annexed to the Mogul empire by Aurangzeb in 1687. Meanwhile, the English set up a small trading post in Masulipatam in 1611, where they traded with varying levels of success. By 1759, when Colonel Forde captured Masulipatam from the French with a force sent by Lord Clive from Calcutta, the English had established their dominance over most of the district.

KIT (1) (probably an adaptation of the Middle Dutch kitie, a wooden tub, usually with a lid and handles; in modern Dutch kit means a tankard), a tub, basket or pail used for holding milk, butter, eggs, fish and other goods; also applied to similar receptacles for various domestic purposes, or for holding a workman’s tools, &c. By transference “kit” came to mean the tools themselves, but more commonly personal effects such as clothing, especially that of a soldier or sailor, the word including the knapsack or other receptacle in which the effects are packed. (2) The name (perhaps a corruption of “cittern” Gr. κιθάρα) of a small violin, about 16 in. long, and played with a bow of nearly the same length, much used at one time by dancing-masters. The French name is pochette, the instrument being small enough to go into the pocket.
KIT (1) (likely derived from the Middle Dutch kitie, a wooden tub, usually with a lid and handles; in modern Dutch kit means a tankard), a tub, basket, or pail used to hold milk, butter, eggs, fish, and other items; also used for similar containers for various household purposes or for storing a worker’s tools, etc. By extension, “kit” came to refer to the tools themselves, but more often to personal belongings like clothing, especially those of a soldier or sailor, including the knapsack or other container where the items are packed. (2) The name (possibly a variation of “cittern” Gr. guitar) for a small violin, about 16 inches long, played with a bow of nearly the same length, which was commonly used by dancing instructors. The French term is pochette, as the instrument is small enough to fit in a pocket.

KITAZATO, SHIBASABURO (1856- ), Japanese doctor of medicine, was born at Kumamoto in 1856 and studied in Germany under Koch from 1885 to 1891. He became one of the foremost bacteriologists of the world, and enjoyed the credit of having discovered the bacilli of tetanus, diphtheria and plague, the last in conjunction with Dr Aoyama, who accompanied him to Hong-Kong in 1894 during an epidemic at that place.
KITAZATO, SHIBASABURO (1856- ), a Japanese doctor, was born in Kumamoto in 1856 and studied in Germany under Koch from 1885 to 1891. He became one of the leading bacteriologists in the world and is recognized for discovering the bacilli of tetanus, diphtheria, and plague, the latter in collaboration with Dr. Aoyama, who traveled with him to Hong Kong in 1894 during an epidemic there.

KIT-CAT CLUB, a club of Whig wits, painters, politicians and men of letters, founded in London about 1703. The name was derived from that of Christopher Cat, the keeper of the pie-house in which the club met in Shire Lane, near Temple Bar. The meetings were afterwards held at the Fountain tavern in the Strand, and latterly in a room specially built for the purpose at Barn Elms, the residence of the secretary, Jacob Tonson, the publisher. In summer the club met at the Upper Flask, Hampstead Heath. The club originally consisted of thirty-nine, afterwards of forty-eight members, and included among others the duke of Marlborough, Lords Halifax and Somers, Sir Robert Walpole, Vanbrugh, Congreve, Steele and Addison. The portraits of many of the members were painted by Sir Godfrey Kneller, himself a member, of a uniform size suited to the height of the Barn Elms room in which the club dined. The canvas, 36 × 28 in., admitted of less than a half-length portrait but was sufficiently long to include a hand, and this is known as the kit-cat size. The club was dissolved about 1720.
KIT-CAT CLUB, was a club for Whig intellectuals, artists, politicians, and writers, established in London around 1703. The name came from Christopher Cat, the owner of the pie-house where the club originally gathered in Shire Lane, near Temple Bar. Later, the meetings took place at the Fountain tavern in the Strand, and eventually in a room specially constructed for the club at Barn Elms, the home of the secretary, Jacob Tonson, who was a publisher. During the summer, the club met at the Upper Flask on Hampstead Heath. Initially, the club had thirty-nine members, later increasing to forty-eight, featuring notable figures such as the Duke of Marlborough, Lords Halifax and Somers, Sir Robert Walpole, Vanbrugh, Congreve, Steele, and Addison. Many members’ portraits were painted by Sir Godfrey Kneller, also a member, all made to a uniform size suitable for the height of the Barn Elms dining room. The canvas, measuring 36 × 28 inches, allowed for less than a half-length portrait but was long enough to include a hand, which became known as the kit-cat size. The club was disbanded around 1720.

KITCHEN (O.E. cycene; this and other cognate forms, such as Dutch keuken, Ger. Küche, Dan. kökken, Fr. cuisine, are formed from the Low Lat. cucina, Lat. coquina, coquere, to cook), the room or place in a house set apart for cooking, in which the culinary and other domestic utensils are kept. The range or cooking-stove fitted with boiler for hot water, oven and other appliances, is often known as a “kitchener” (see Cookery and Heating). Archaeologists have used the term “kitchen-midden,” i.e. kitchen rubbish-heap (Danish kökken-mödding) for the rubbish heaps of prehistoric man, containing bones, remains of edible shell-fish, implements, &c. (see Shell-heaps). “Midden,” in Middle English mydding, is a Scandinavian word, from myg, muck, filth, and dyng, heap; the latter word gives the English “dung.”
KITCHEN (Old English cycene; this and other related forms, such as Dutch keuken, German Küche, Danish kökken, French cuisine, come from the Low Latin cucina, Latin coquina, coquere, meaning to cook), is the room or area in a house designated for cooking, where cooking and other household utensils are kept. The stove or cooking appliance equipped with a boiler for hot water, oven, and other devices is often referred to as a “kitchener” (see Cookery and Heating). Archaeologists have adopted the term “kitchen-midden,” meaning kitchen garbage dump (Danish kökken-mödding), to describe the trash heaps of prehistoric humans, which contain bones, remains of shellfish, tools, etc. (see Shell-heaps). “Midden,” from Middle English mydding, is a Scandinavian term derived from myg, meaning muck or filth, and dyng, meaning heap; the latter word gives us the English “dung.”

KITCHENER, HORATIO HERBERT KITCHENER, Viscount (1850- ), British field marshal, was the son of Lieut.-Colonel H. H. Kitchener and was born at Bally Longford, Co. Kerry, on the 24th of June 1850. He entered the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, in 1868, and was commissioned second lieutenant, Royal Engineers, in 1871. As a subaltern he was employed in survey work in Cyprus and Palestine, and on promotion to captain in 1883 was attached to the Egyptian army, then in course of re-organization under British officers. In the following year he served on the staff of the British expeditionary force on the Nile, and was promoted successively major and lieutenant-colonel by brevet for his services. From 1886 to 1888 he was commandant at Suakin, commanding and receiving a severe wound in the action of Handub in 1888. In 1888 he commanded a brigade in the actions of Gamaizieh and Toski. From 1889 to 1892 he served as adjutant-general of the army. He had become brevet-colonel in the British army in 1888, and he received the C.B. in 1889 after the action of Toski. In 1892 Colonel Kitchener succeeded Sir Francis (Lord) Grenfell as sirdar of the Egyptian army, and three years later, when he had completed his predecessor’s work of re-organizing the forces of the khedive, he began the formation of an expeditionary force on the vexed military frontier of Wady Halfa. The advance into the Sudan (see Egypt, Military Operations) was prepared by thorough administrative work on his part which gained universal admiration. In 1896 Kitchener won the action of Ferket (June 7) and advanced the frontier and the railway to Dongola. In 1897 Sir Archibald Hunter’s victory of Abu Hamed (Aug. 7) carried the Egyptian flag one stage farther, and in 1898 the resolve to destroy the Mahdi’s power was openly indicated by the despatch of a British force to co-operate with the Egyptians. The sirdar, who in 1896 became a British major-general and received the K.C.B., commanded the united force, which stormed the Mahdist zareba on the river Atbara on the 8th of April, and, the outposts being soon afterwards advanced to Metemmeh and Shendy, the British force was augmented to the strength of a division for the final advance on Khartum. Kitchener’s work was crowned and the power of the Mahdists utterly destroyed by the victory of Omdurman (Sept. 2), for which he was raised to the peerage as Baron Kitchener of Khartoum, received the G.C.B., the thanks of parliament and a grant of £30,000. Little more than a year afterwards, while still sirdar of the Egyptian army, he was promoted lieutenant-general and appointed chief-of-staff to Lord Roberts in the South African War (see Transvaal, History). In this capacity he served in the campaign of Paardeberg, the advance on Bloemfontein and the subsequent northward advance to Pretoria, and on Lord Roberts’ return to England in November 1900 succeeded him as commander-in-chief, receiving at the same time the local rank of general. In June 1902 the long and harassing war came to its close, and Kitchener was rewarded by advancement to the dignity of viscount, promotion to the substantive rank of general “for distinguished service,” the thanks of parliament and a grant of £50,000. He was also included in the Order of Merit.
Kitchener, Horatio Herbert Kitchener, Viscount (1850- ), British field marshal, was the son of Lieut.-Colonel H. H. Kitchener and was born in Bally Longford, Co. Kerry, on June 24, 1850. He entered the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, in 1868 and was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Royal Engineers in 1871. As a junior officer, he worked on survey projects in Cyprus and Palestine, and after being promoted to captain in 1883, he joined the Egyptian army, which was being reorganized by British officers. The following year, he served on the staff of the British expeditionary force on the Nile and received promotions to major and lieutenant-colonel for his achievements. From 1886 to 1888, he was the commandant at Suakin, where he commanded forces and was seriously wounded at the battle of Handub in 1888. In that same year, he led a brigade in the battles of Gamaizieh and Toski. From 1889 to 1892, he served as the adjutant-general of the army. He became a brevet-colonel in the British army in 1888 and received the C.B. in 1889 after the battle of Toski. In 1892, Colonel Kitchener took over from Sir Francis (Lord) Grenfell as the leader of the Egyptian army, and three years later, after finishing his predecessor’s task of reorganizing the khedive’s forces, he started creating an expeditionary force for the challenging military frontier of Wady Halfa. Kitchener’s thorough administrative preparations for the advance into Sudan (see Egypt, Military Operations) earned him widespread admiration. In 1896, he achieved victory at the battle of Ferket (June 7) and pushed the frontier and the railway to Dongola. In 1897, Sir Archibald Hunter’s victory at Abu Hamed (Aug. 7) advanced the Egyptian flag further, and in 1898, the decision to eliminate the Mahdi’s influence was clearly marked by sending a British force to work with the Egyptians. The sirdar, who became a British major-general in 1896 and received the K.C.B., led the combined forces that attacked the Mahdist zareba on the Atbara River on April 8, and shortly thereafter, the outposts advanced to Metemmeh and Shendy, strengthening the British force for the final push towards Khartum. Kitchener's efforts culminated in the complete destruction of the Mahdist power with the victory at Omdurman (Sept. 2), for which he was elevated to the peerage as Baron Kitchener of Khartoum, awarded the G.C.B., received the thanks of Parliament, and granted £30,000. Just over a year later, while still the sirdar of the Egyptian army, he was promoted to lieutenant-general and appointed chief of staff to Lord Roberts during the South African War (see Transvaal, History). In this role, he participated in the campaign at Paardeberg, the advance on Bloemfontein, and the subsequent northward march to Pretoria. After Lord Roberts returned to England in November 1900, Kitchener took over as commander-in-chief, also receiving the local rank of general. The lengthy and challenging war ended in June 1902, and Kitchener was honored with a promotion to viscount, elevated to the substantive rank of general “for distinguished service,” the thanks of Parliament, and a grant of £50,000. He was also included in the Order of Merit.
Immediately after the peace he went to India as commander-in-chief in the East Indies, and in this position, which he held for seven years, he carried out not only many far-reaching administrative reforms but a complete re-organization and strategical redistribution of the British and native forces. On leaving India in 1909 he was promoted field marshal, and succeeded the duke of Connaught as commander-in-chief and high commissioner in the Mediterranean. This post, not of great importance in itself, was regarded as a virtual command of the colonial as distinct from the home and the Indian forces, and on his appointment Lord Kitchener (after a visit to Japan) undertook a tour of inspection of the forces of the empire, and went to Australia and New Zealand in order to assist in drawing up local schemes of defence. In this mission he was highly successful, and earned golden opinions. But soon after his return to England in April 1910 he declined to take up his Mediterranean appointment, owing to his dislike of its inadequate scope, and he was succeeded in June by Sir Ian Hamilton.
Immediately after the peace, he went to India as commander-in-chief in the East Indies. In this role, which he held for seven years, he implemented many significant administrative reforms and completely reorganized and strategically redistributed the British and native forces. After leaving India in 1909, he was promoted to field marshal and succeeded the duke of Connaught as commander-in-chief and high commissioner in the Mediterranean. Although this position wasn't particularly important on its own, it was seen as a de facto command of the colonial forces, separate from the home and Indian forces. Upon his appointment, Lord Kitchener (following a visit to Japan) undertook a tour to inspect the forces of the empire and visited Australia and New Zealand to help develop local defense plans. He was highly successful in this mission and gained a great reputation. However, soon after returning to England in April 1910, he chose not to take up his Mediterranean appointment due to his dissatisfaction with its limited scope, and he was succeeded in June by Sir Ian Hamilton.

KITE,1 the Falco milvus of Linnaeus and Milvus ictinus of modern ornithologists, once probably the most familiar bird of prey in Great Britain, and now one of the rarest. Three or four hundred years ago foreigners were struck with its abundance in the streets of London. It was doubtless the scavenger in ordinary of that and other large towns (as kindred species now are in Eastern lands), except where its place was taken by the raven; for Sir Thomas Browne (c. 1662) wrote of the latter at Norwich—“in good plentie about the citty which makes so few kites to be seen hereabout.” John Wolley has well remarked of the modern Londoners that few “who see the paper toys hovering over the parks in fine days of summer, have any idea that the bird from which they derive their name used to float all day in hot weather high over the heads of their ancestors.” Even at the beginning of the 19th century the kite formed a feature of many 839 a rural landscape in England, as they had done in the days when the poet Cowper wrote of them. “But an evil time soon came upon the species. It must have been always hated by the henwife, but the resources of civilization in the shape of the gun and the gin were denied to her. They were, however, employed with fatal zeal by the gamekeeper; for the kite, which had long afforded the supremest sport to the falconer, was now left friendless,”2 and in a very few years it seems to have been exterminated throughout the greater part of England, certain woods in the Western Midlands, as well as Wales, excepted. In these latter a small remnant still exists; but the well-wishers of this beautiful species are naturally chary of giving information that might lead to its further persecution. In Scotland there is no reason to suppose that its numbers suffered much diminution until about 1835, or even later, when the systematic destruction of “vermin” on so many moors was begun. In Scotland, however, it is now as much restricted to certain districts as in England or Wales, and those districts it would be most inexpedient to indicate.
KITE,1 the Falco milvus of Linnaeus and Milvus ictinus of modern bird watchers, was once probably the most common bird of prey in Great Britain, and now it’s one of the rarest. Three or four hundred years ago, visitors were amazed by how many were seen in the streets of London. It likely served as a scavenger in that city and other large towns (similar species still do in Eastern countries), unless the raven took its place; for Sir Thomas Browne (c. 1662) noted about the latter in Norwich—“in good numbers around the city, which makes so few kites to be seen here.” John Wolley has noted that few modern Londoners “who see the paper toys hovering over the parks on sunny summer days, have any idea that the bird from which they get their name used to gracefully float all day in the heat above their ancestors' heads.” Even at the start of the 19th century, kites were a common sight in many rural areas of England, just as they were when the poet Cowper wrote about them. “But a dark time soon fell upon the species. They were always disliked by the henwife, but she didn't have the tools of civilization like guns and traps. However, those tools were used with deadly intent by gamekeepers; the kite, which once provided the ultimate thrill for falconers, was now left without friends,”2 and it seems to have been wiped out throughout most of England in just a few years, except for certain woods in the Western Midlands and Wales. In these areas, a small number still exist, but those who care about this beautiful species are understandably cautious about sharing information that could lead to more persecution. In Scotland, there’s no reason to believe that the population dropped much until around 1835, or even later, when the systematic eradication of “vermin” began on many moors. However, in Scotland, it is now confined to certain areas just like in England or Wales, and it would be unwise to specify those areas.
The kite is, according to its sex, from 25 to 27 in. in length, about one half of which is made up by its deeply forked tail, capable of great expansion, and therefore a powerful rudder, enabling the bird while soaring on its wide wings, more than 5 ft. in extent, to direct its circling course with scarcely a movement that is apparent to the spectator below. Its general colour is pale reddish-brown or cinnamon, the head being greyish-white, but almost each feather has the shaft dark. The tail feathers are broad, of a light red, barred with deep brown, and furnish the salmon fisher with one of the choicest materials of his “flies.” The nest, nearly always built in the crotch of a large tree, is formed of sticks intermixed with many strange substances collected as chance may offer, but among them rags3 seem always to have a place. The eggs, three or four in number, are of a dull white, spotted and blotched with several shades of brown, and often lilac. It is especially mentioned by old authors that in Great Britain the kite was resident throughout the year; whereas on the Continent it is one of the most regular and marked migrants, stretching its wings towards the south in autumn, wintering in Africa, and returning in spring to the land of its birth.
The kite measures between 25 to 27 inches in length, depending on its sex, with about half of that being its deeply forked tail, which can expand significantly and acts as a strong rudder. This allows the bird, while soaring on its broad wings that span over 5 feet, to steer its circular path with minimal noticeable movements to those watching from below. Its overall color is a pale reddish-brown or cinnamon, with a greyish-white head, although nearly every feather has a dark shaft. The tail feathers are wide, light red, striped with dark brown, and provide salmon fishermen with one of the best materials for their "flies." The nest, usually built in the fork of a large tree, is made of sticks mixed with various unusual materials collected as they come, but rags seem to always have a spot in it. The eggs, typically three or four, are dull white, speckled and blotched with multiple shades of brown, and sometimes lilac. Older authors specifically noted that in Great Britain, the kite stayed year-round, while on the Continent, it is one of the most regular migrants, heading south in the fall, wintering in Africa, and returning in spring to its birthplace.
There is a second European species, not distantly related, the Milvus migrans or M. ater of most authors,4 smaller in size, with a general dull blackish-brown plumage and a less forked tail. In some districts this is much commoner than the red kite, and on one occasion it has appeared in England. Its habits are very like those of the species already described, but it seems to be more addicted to fishing. Nearly allied to this black kite are the M. aegyptius of Africa, the M. govinda (the common pariah kite of India),5 the M. melanotis of Eastern Asia, and the M. affinis and M. isurus; the last is by some authors removed to another genus or sub-genus as Lophoictinia, and is peculiar to Australia, while M. affinis also occurs in Ceylon, Burma, and some of the Malay countries as well. All these may be considered true kites, while those next to be mentioned are more aberrant forms. First there is Elanus, the type of which is E. caeruleus, a beautiful little bird, the black-winged kite of English authors, that comes to the south of Europe from Africa, and has several congeners—E. axillaris and E. scriptus of Australia being most worthy of notice. An extreme development of this form is found in the African Nauclerus riocourii, as well as in Elanoides furcatus, the swallow-tailed kite, a widely-ranging bird in America, and remarkable for its length of wing and tail, which gives it a marvellous power of flight, and serves to explain the unquestionable fact of its having twice appeared in Great Britain. To Elanus also Ictinia, another American form, is allied, though perhaps more remotely, and it is represented by I. mississippiensis, the Mississippi kite, which is by some considered to be but the northern race of the Neotropical I. plumbea. Gampsonyx, Rostrhamus and Cymindis, all belonging to the Neotropical region, complete the series of forms that seem to compose the sub-family Milvinae, though there may be doubt about the last, and some systematists would thereto add the perns or honey-buzzards, Perninae.
There is a second European species, not very distantly related, the Milvus migrans or M. ater according to most authors, which is smaller in size and has a generally dull blackish-brown plumage with a less forked tail. In some areas, this bird is much more common than the red kite, and it has been seen in England on one occasion. Its behavior is quite similar to that of the already described species, but it seems to be more inclined towards fishing. Closely related to this black kite are the M. aegyptius from Africa, the M. govinda (the common pariah kite of India), 5 the M. melanotis from Eastern Asia, and the M. affinis and M. isurus; the latter is classified by some authors in a different genus or sub-genus as Lophoictinia and is unique to Australia, while M. affinis is also found in Ceylon, Burma, and some of the Malay countries. All of these can be considered true kites, while the next mentioned are more distinct forms. First is Elanus, with E. caeruleus as the type, a beautiful little bird known as the black-winged kite in English literature, which migrates to southern Europe from Africa and has several relatives—most notably E. axillaris and E. scriptus from Australia. An extreme version of this type is found in the African Nauclerus riocourii, as well as in Elanoides furcatus, the swallow-tailed kite, which has a wide range in America and is notable for its long wings and tail, granting it exceptional flying abilities, explaining its rare appearances in Great Britain. Elanus is also related, though perhaps more distantly, to Ictinia, another American type, represented by I. mississippiensis, the Mississippi kite, which is sometimes considered just the northern race of the Neotropical I. plumbea. Gampsonyx, Rostrhamus, and Cymindis, all from the Neotropical region, complete the series of forms that appear to make up the sub-family Milvinae, though there may be uncertainty about the last, and some taxonomists might also include the perns or honey-buzzards, Perninae.
1 In O.E. is cýta; no related word appears in cognate languages. Glede, cognate with “glide,” is also another English name.
1 In Old English, it's cýta; no related word appears in similar languages. Glede, which is related to “glide,” is another name in English.
2 George, third earl of Orford, died in 1791, and Colonel Thornton, who with him had been the latest follower of this highest branch of the art of falconry, broke up his hawking establishment not many years after. There is no evidence that the pursuit of the kite was in England or any other country reserved to kings or privileged persons, but the taking of it was quite beyond the powers of the ordinary trained falcons, and in older days practically became limited to those of the sovereign. Hence the kite had attached to it, especially in France, the epithet of “royal,” which has still survived in the specific appellation of regalis applied to it by many ornithologists. The scandalous work of Sir Antony Weldon (Court and Character of King James, p. 104) bears witness to the excellence of the kite as a quarry in an amusing story of the “British Solomon,” whose master-falconer, Sir Thomas Monson, being determined to outdo the performance of the French king’s falconer, who, when sent to England to show sport, “could not kill one kite, ours being more magnanimous than the French kite,” at last succeeded, after an outlay of £1000, in getting a cast of hawks that took nine kites running—“never missed one.” On the strength of this, James was induced to witness a flight at Royston, “but the kite went to such a mountee as all the field lost sight of kite and hawke and all, and neither kite nor hawke were either seen or heard of to this present.”
2 George, the third Earl of Orford, died in 1791, and Colonel Thornton, who had been the last devotee of this highest form of falconry, dismantled his hawking setup not long after. There’s no proof that kite hunting in England or elsewhere was exclusive to kings or the elite, but capturing one was beyond the capabilities of regular trained falcons and had mostly become a pursuit limited to royalty. As a result, the kite earned the label of “royal,” especially in France, which still persists in the scientific name regalis used by many ornithologists. The scandalous writings of Sir Antony Weldon (Court and Character of King James, p. 104) highlight the kite’s reputation as a prime target in a humorous tale about the “British Solomon.” His master falconer, Sir Thomas Monson, was eager to outshine the French king’s falconer, who, when sent to England to demonstrate his skills, “could not kill a single kite, as ours were more impressive than the French kite.” After spending £1000, he finally managed to get a team of hawks that caught nine kites in succession—“never missed one.” Because of this, James was persuaded to witness a flight at Royston, “but the kite flew to such a height that everyone in the field lost sight of both the kite and the hawk, and neither the kite nor the hawk has been seen or heard of since.”
3 Thus justifying the advice of Shakespeare’s Autolycus (Winter’s Tale, iv. 3)—“When the kite builds, look to lesser linen”—very necessary in the case of the laundresses in olden time, when the bird commonly frequented their drying-grounds.
3 This validates the advice of Shakespeare’s Autolycus (Winter’s Tale, iv. 3)—“When the kite builds, look to lesser linen”—which was very important for laundresses in the old days, when these birds often visited their drying areas.
4 Dr R. Bowdler Sharpe (Cat. Birds Brit. Mus. i. 322) calls it M. korschun, but the figure of S. G. Gmelin’s Accipiter Korschun, whence the name is taken, unquestionably represents the moor-buzzard (Circus aeruginosus).
4 Dr. R. Bowdler Sharpe (Cat. Birds Brit. Mus. i. 322) refers to it as M. korschun, but the illustration from S. G. Gmelin’s Accipiter Korschun, which is the source of the name, clearly depicts the moor-buzzard (Circus aeruginosus).

Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!