This is a modern-English version of The Diary of John Evelyn (Volume 2 of 2), originally written by Evelyn, John.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
Note: |
Transcriber's Note
Page headers in the original text indicated the location of the author. I have converted these to sidenotes. When the location did not change over several pages, only one sidenote was used.
Page headers in the original text showed where the author was located. I changed these to sidenotes. When the location stayed the same for several pages, I used only one sidenote.

THE DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM
THE DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM
From an old painting
From a classic painting

THE DIARY OF JOHN EVELYN
WILLIAM BRAY Member of the Antiquarian Society
FROM THE EDITOR
RICHARD GARNETT, Ph.D.
From the British Museum
ILLUSTRATIONS
VOLUME I.
Charles I in Prison | Frontispiece | ||
Photogravure after De La Roche. | |||
Lord William Russell Saying Goodbye to His Children, 1683 | 180 | ||
Photogravure after a painting by Bridges. | |||
Oliver Cromwell dictating to John Milton. | 284 | ||
The letter to the Duke of Savoy to stop the persecution of the Protestants of Piedmont, 1655. The letter to the Duke of Savoy to stop the persecution of the Protestants of Piedmont, 1655. Photogravure from an engraving by Sartain after Newenham. Photogravure from an engraving by Sartain after Newenham. |
VOLUME II.
The Duke of Buckingham | Frontispiece | ||
From an old painting. | |||
Nell Gwyn | 64 | ||
Photogravure after Sir Peter Lely. |
THE DIARY OF JOHN EVELYN.
2d January, 1665.
January 2, 1665.
This day was published by me that part of "The Mystery of Jesuitism" translated and collected by me, though without my name, containing the Imaginary Heresy, with four letters and other pieces.
This day, I published that section of "The Mystery of Jesuitism" that I translated and compiled, even though it was published without my name. It includes the Imaginary Heresy, along with four letters and other writings.
4th January, 1665. I went in a coach, it being excessive sharp frost and snow, toward Dover and other parts of Kent, to settle physicians, chirurgeons, agents, marshals, and other officers in all the sea ports, to take care of such as should be set on shore, wounded, sick, or prisoners, in pursuance of our commission reaching from the North Foreland, in Kent, to Portsmouth, in Hampshire. The rest of the ports in England were allotted to the other Commissioners. That evening I came to Rochester, where I delivered the Privy Council's letter to the Mayor to receive orders from me.
4th January, 1665. I took a coach, as it was extremely cold with frost and snow, heading toward Dover and other parts of Kent to arrange for physicians, surgeons, agents, marshals, and other officials in all the sea ports to care for those who would be brought ashore, whether they were wounded, sick, or prisoners, following our commission which extended from North Foreland in Kent to Portsmouth in Hampshire. The other ports in England were assigned to the other Commissioners. That evening, I arrived in Rochester, where I handed the Privy Council's letter to the Mayor to receive instructions from me.
5th January, 1665. I arrived at Canterbury, and went to the cathedral, exceedingly well repaired since his Majesty's return.
5th January, 1665. I arrived in Canterbury and went to the cathedral, which has been wonderfully restored since the King's return.
6th January, 1665. To Dover, where Colonel Stroode, Lieutenant of the Castle, having received the letter I brought him from the Duke of Albemarle, made me lodge in it, and I was splendidly treated, assisting me from place to place. Here I settled my first Deputy. The Mayor and officers of the Customs were very civil to me.
6th January, 1665. I went to Dover, where Colonel Stroode, the Lieutenant of the Castle, received the letter I brought him from the Duke of Albemarle. He had me stay in the castle and treated me wonderfully, helping me get around. Here, I appointed my first Deputy. The Mayor and customs officials were very polite to me.
9th January, 1665. To Deal.—10th. To Sandwich, a pretty town, about two miles from the sea. The Mayor and officers of the Customs were very diligent to serve me. I visited the forts in the way, and returned that night to Canterbury.
9th January, 1665. To Deal.—10th. To Sandwich, a nice town, about two miles from the sea. The Mayor and customs officials were very diligent in serving me. I visited the forts along the way and returned that night to Canterbury.
11th January, 1665. To Rochester, when I took order to settle officers at Chatham.
11th January, 1665. To Rochester, where I arranged to appoint officers at Chatham.
12th January, 1665. To Gravesend, and returned home. A cold, busy, but not unpleasant journey.
12th January, 1665. To Gravesend, and returned home. It was a cold, busy, but not unpleasant trip.
25th January, 1665. This night being at Whitehall, his Majesty came to me standing in the withdrawing-room,[Pg 2] and gave me thanks for publishing "The Mysteries of Jesuitism," which he said he had carried two days in his pocket, read it, and encouraged me; at which I did not a little wonder: I suppose Sir Robert Murray had given it to him.
25th January, 1665. That night at Whitehall, the King approached me while I was in the withdrawing room,[Pg 2] and thanked me for publishing "The Mysteries of Jesuitism." He mentioned that he had carried it in his pocket for two days, read it, and encouraged me, which surprised me. I assume Sir Robert Murray must have given it to him.
27th January, 1665. Dined at the Lord Chancellor's, who caused me after dinner to sit two or three hours alone with him in his bedchamber.
27th January, 1665. Had dinner at the Lord Chancellor's, who had me sit alone with him for two or three hours in his bedroom after dinner.
2d February, 1665. I saw a Masque performed at Court, by six gentlemen and six ladies, surprising his Majesty, it being Candlemas day.
2nd February, 1665. I saw a Masque performed at Court, by six gentlemen and six ladies, surprising his Majesty, as it was Candlemas Day.
8th February, Ash Wednesday, 1665. I visited our prisoners at Chelsea College, and to examine how the marshal and sutlers behaved. These were prisoners taken in the war; they only complained that their bread was too fine. I dined at Sir Henry Herbert's, Master of the Revels.
8th February, Ash Wednesday, 1665. I visited our prisoners at Chelsea College to check on how the marshal and sutlers were doing. These were prisoners captured during the war; they only complained that their bread was too fancy. I had lunch at Sir Henry Herbert's, Master of the Revels.
9th February, 1665. Dined at my Lord Treasurer's, the Earl of Southampton, in Bloomsbury, where he was building a noble square or piazza,1 a little town; his own house stands too low, some noble rooms, a pretty cedar chapel, a naked garden to the north, but good air. I had much discourse with his Lordship, whom I found to be a person of extraordinary parts, but a valetudinarian.—I went to St. James's Park, where I saw various animals, and examined the throat of the Onocrotylus, or pelican, a fowl between a stork and a swan; a melancholy water-fowl, brought from Astrakhan by the Russian Ambassador; it was diverting to see how he would toss up and turn a flat fish, plaice, or flounder, to get it right into his gullet at its lower beak, which, being filmy, stretches to a prodigious wideness when it devours a great fish. Here was also a small water-fowl, not bigger than a moorhen, that went almost quite erect, like the penguin of America; it would eat as much fish as its whole body weighed; I never saw so unsatiable a devourer, yet the body did not appear to swell the bigger. The solan geese here are also great devourers, and are said soon to exhaust all the fish in a pond. Here was a curious sort of poultry not much exceeding the size of a tame pigeon, with legs so short as their crops seemed to touch the earth; a milk-[Pg 3]white raven; a stork, which was a rarity at this season, seeing he was loose, and could fly loftily; two Balearian cranes, one of which having had one of his legs broken and cut off above the knee, had a wooden or boxen leg and thigh, with a joint so accurately made that the creature could walk and use it as well as if it had been natural; it was made by a soldier. The park was at this time stored with numerous flocks of several sorts of ordinary and extraordinary wild fowl, breeding about the Decoy, which for being near so great a city, and among such a concourse of soldiers and people, is a singular and diverting thing. There were also deer of several countries, white; spotted like leopards; antelopes, an elk, red deer, roebucks, stags, Guinea goats, Arabian sheep, etc. There were withy-pots, or nests, for the wild fowl to lay their eggs in, a little above the surface of the water.
9th February, 1665. Had dinner at my Lord Treasurer's, the Earl of Southampton, in Bloomsbury, where he was building a grand square or piazza, a sort of little town; his house is too low, with some impressive rooms, a lovely cedar chapel, and a bare garden to the north, but good fresh air. I had a long conversation with his Lordship, who I found to be an exceptionally capable person, but in poor health. I went to St. James's Park, where I saw various animals and examined the throat of the Onocrotylus, or pelican, a bird that's a mix between a stork and a swan; a rather gloomy water bird, brought from Astrakhan by the Russian Ambassador; it was entertaining to watch as it would toss a flat fish, like plaice or flounder, up in the air to catch it just right into its throat at the lower beak, which can stretch enormously wide when swallowing large fish. I also saw a small water bird, no bigger than a moorhen, that stood almost straight up, like a penguin from America; it could eat as much fish as its entire body weighed; I’ve never seen such an insatiable eater, yet its body didn’t seem to get any bigger. The solan geese here are also great eaters and are said to quickly consume all the fish in a pond. There was a fascinating type of poultry, not much larger than a pet pigeon, with such short legs that their crops appeared to touch the ground; a milk-white raven; a stork, which was unusual at this time of year since it was free and could fly high; two Balearian cranes, one of which had a broken leg cut off above the knee, and had a wooden leg and thigh, made so well that the creature could walk and use it as if it were natural; it was crafted by a soldier. The park was filled with numerous flocks of various common and rare wild birds breeding around the Decoy, which, being so close to a big city and among so many soldiers and people, is quite a remarkable and entertaining sight. There were also deer from several regions, white ones; spotted like leopards; antelopes, an elk, red deer, roebucks, stags, Guinea goats, Arabian sheep, etc. There were nests for the wild birds to lay their eggs in, just above the water's surface.
23d February, 1665. I was invited to a great feast at Mr. Rich's (a relation of my wife's, now reader at Lincoln's Inn); where was the Duke of Monmouth, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Bishops of London and Winchester, the Speaker of the House of Commons, divers of the Judges, and several other great men.
23rd February, 1665. I was invited to a big feast at Mr. Rich's (a relative of my wife's, who is now the reader at Lincoln's Inn); where the Duke of Monmouth, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishops of London and Winchester, the Speaker of the House of Commons, several judges, and other prominent people were present.
24th February, 1665. Dr. Fell, Canon of Christ Church, preached before the King, on 15 ch. Romans, v. 2, a very formal discourse, and in blank verse, according to his manner; however, he is a good man.—Mr. Philips, preceptor to my son, went to be with the Earl of Pembroke's son, my Lord Herbert.
24th February, 1665. Dr. Fell, Canon of Christ Church, preached before the King, on Romans 15:2, a very formal sermon, and in blank verse, as he usually does; still, he is a good man.—Mr. Philips, who teaches my son, went to be with the Earl of Pembroke's son, my Lord Herbert.
2d March, 1665. I went with his Majesty into the lobby behind the House of Lords, where I saw the King and the rest of the Lords robe themselves, and got into the House of Lords in a corner near the woolsack, on which the Lord Chancellor sits next below the throne: the King sat in all the regalia, the crown-imperial on his head, the sceptre and globe, etc. The Duke of Albemarle bore the sword, the Duke of Ormond, the cap of dignity. The rest of the Lords robed in their places:—a most splendid and august convention. Then came the Speaker and the House of Commons, and at the bar made a speech, and afterward presented several bills, a nod only passing them, the clerk saying, Le Roy le veult, as to public bills, as to private, Soit faite commeil est desirè. Then, his Majesty made a handsome but short speech, commanding my Lord[Pg 4] Privy Seal to prorogue the Parliament, which he did, the Chancellor being ill and absent. I had not before seen this ceremony.
2nd March, 1665. I went with His Majesty into the lobby behind the House of Lords, where I saw the King and the other Lords put on their robes and entered the House of Lords in a corner near the woolsack, where the Lord Chancellor sits just below the throne. The King was in all his regalia, wearing the imperial crown, holding the sceptre and globe, etc. The Duke of Albemarle carried the sword, and the Duke of Ormond held the cap of dignity. The other Lords robed themselves in their places:—a truly magnificent and distinguished gathering. Then the Speaker and the House of Commons arrived and made a speech at the bar, afterward presenting several bills; a mere nod was enough to pass them, with the clerk saying, Le Roy le veult for public bills, and for private ones, Soit faite comme il est desiré. Then, His Majesty gave a nice but brief speech, instructing my Lord[Pg 4] Privy Seal to prorogue the Parliament, which he did, as the Chancellor was ill and absent. I had never seen this ceremony before.
9th March, 1665. I went to receive the poor creatures that were saved out of the London frigate, blown up by accident, with above 200 men.
9th March, 1665. I went to take in the unfortunate souls who were rescued from the London frigate, which had been blown up by accident, claiming over 200 men.
29th March, 1665. Went to Goring House, now Mr. Secretary Bennet's, ill-built, but the place capable of being made a pretty villa. His Majesty was now finishing the Decoy in the Park.
29th March, 1665. Went to Goring House, now Mr. Secretary Bennet's. The place is poorly built, but it could be turned into a nice villa. His Majesty was finishing the Decoy in the Park.
2d April, 1665. Took order about some prisoners sent from Captain Allen's ship, taken in the Solomon, viz, the brave men who defended her so gallantly.
2nd April, 1665. Made arrangements for some prisoners sent from Captain Allen's ship, captured in the Solomon, namely, the courageous men who defended her so bravely.
5th April, 1665. Was a day of public humiliation and for success of this terrible war, begun doubtless at secret instigation of the French to weaken the States and Protestant interest. Prodigious preparations on both sides.
5th April, 1665. It was a day of public humiliation and for the success of this terrible war, which undoubtedly started at the secret urging of the French to weaken the States and the Protestant cause. Huge preparations were underway on both sides.
6th April, 1665. In the afternoon, I saw acted "Mustapha," a tragedy written by the Earl of Orrery.
6th April, 1665. In the afternoon, I saw performed "Mustapha," a tragedy written by the Earl of Orrery.
11th April, 1665. To London, being now left the only Commissioner to take all necessary orders how to exchange, remove, and keep prisoners, dispose of hospitals, etc.; the rest of the Commissioners being gone to their several districts, in expectation of a sudden engagement.
11th April, 1665. To London, now that I’m the only Commissioner left to handle everything needed for exchanging, relocating, and managing prisoners, organizing hospitals, etc.; the other Commissioners have gone to their respective areas, anticipating a quick battle.
19th April, 1665. Invited to a great dinner at the Trinity House, where I had business with the Commissioners of the Navy, and to receive the second £5,000, impressed for the service of the sick and wounded prisoners.
19th April, 1665. Invited to a big dinner at the Trinity House, where I had business with the Navy Commissioners, and to receive the second £5,000 allocated for the care of sick and wounded prisoners.
20th April, 1665. To Whitehall, to the King, who called me into his bedchamber as he was dressing, to whom, I showed the letter written to me from the Duke of York from the fleet, giving me notice of young Evertzen, and some considerable commanders newly taken in fight with the Dartmouth and Diamond frigates, whom he had sent me as prisoners at war; I went to know of his Majesty how he would have me treat them, when he commanded me to bring the young captain to him, and to take the word of the Dutch Ambassador (who yet remained here) for the other, that he should render himself to me whenever I called on him, and not stir without leave. Upon which I desired more guards, the prison being Chelsea House. I went also to Lord Arlington (the Secretary[Pg 5] Bennet lately made a Lord) about other business. Dined at my Lord Chancellor's; none with him but Sir Sackville Crowe, formerly Ambassador at Constantinople; we were very cheerful and merry.
20th April, 1665. I went to Whitehall to see the King, who called me into his bedroom while he was getting dressed. I showed him the letter from the Duke of York, who was on the fleet, informing me about young Evertzen and some notable commanders who had recently been captured in battle with the Dartmouth and Diamond frigates. They were sent to me as prisoners of war. I wanted to ask the King how he wanted me to handle them when he instructed me to bring the young captain to him and to take the Dutch Ambassador's word (who was still here) for the other, ensuring that he would come to me whenever I called and not leave without permission. Because of this, I requested more guards, as the prison was at Chelsea House. I also visited Lord Arlington (the Secretary, as Bennet was recently made a Lord) regarding other matters. I had lunch at my Lord Chancellor's; the only other person there was Sir Sackville Crowe, who had previously been Ambassador in Constantinople; we were in good spirits and quite merry.
24th April, 1665. I presented young Captain Evertzen (eldest son of Cornelius, Vice-Admiral of Zealand and nephew of John, now Admiral, a most valiant person) to his Majesty in his bed-chamber. The King gave him his hand to kiss, and restored him his liberty; asked many questions concerning the fight (it being the first blood drawn), his Majesty remembering the many civilities he had formerly received from his relations abroad, who had now so much interest in that considerable Province. Then, I was commanded to go with him to the Holland Ambassador, where he was to stay for his passport, and I was to give him fifty pieces in broad gold. Next day I had the Ambassador's parole for the other Captain, taken in Captain Allen's fight before Calais. I gave the King an account of what I had done, and afterward asked the same favor for another Captain, which his Majesty gave me.
24th April, 1665. I introduced young Captain Evertzen (the eldest son of Cornelius, Vice-Admiral of Zealand and nephew of John, now Admiral, a very brave man) to His Majesty in his bedroom. The King offered his hand to kiss and granted him his freedom; he asked many questions about the battle (this being the first bloodshed), remembering the many kindnesses he had previously received from Evertzen's relatives overseas, who had significant connections in that important Province. Then, I was instructed to accompany him to the Dutch Ambassador, where he would wait for his passport, and I was to give him fifty gold coins. The next day, I received the Ambassador's guarantee for another Captain, captured in Captain Allen's battle before Calais. I informed the King about what I had done and later requested the same favor for another Captain, which His Majesty granted me.
28th April, 1665. I went to Tunbridge, to see a solemn exercise at the free-school there.
28th April, 1665. I went to Tunbridge to witness a formal event at the local free school.
Having taken orders with my marshal about my prisoners, and with the doctor and chirurgeon to attend the wounded enemies, and of our own men, I went to London again, and visited my charge, several with legs and arms off; miserable objects, God knows.
Having checked in with my marshal about my prisoners, and made arrangements with the doctor and surgeon to care for the wounded enemies, as well as our own men, I went back to London and visited my charge, several of whom had lost legs and arms; tragic sights, God knows.
16th May, 1665. To London, to consider of the poor orphans and widows made by this bloody beginning, and whose husbands and relations perished in the London frigate, of which there were fifty widows, and forty-five of them with child.
16th May, 1665. To London, to think about the poor orphans and widows created by this violent start, whose husbands and family members died in the London frigate, which left fifty widows, with forty-five of them expecting.
26th May, 1665. To treat with the Holland Ambassador at Chelsea, for release of divers prisoners of war in Holland on exchange here. After dinner, being called into the Council-Chamber at Whitehall, I gave his Majesty an account of what I had done, informing him of the vast charge upon us, now amounting to no less than £1,000 weekly.
26th May, 1665. To meet with the Dutch Ambassador in Chelsea to discuss the release of various prisoners of war in the Netherlands in exchange for those here. After dinner, I was called into the Council Chamber at Whitehall, where I reported to His Majesty about what I had done, informing him of the significant cost to us, which now totals no less than £1,000 per week.
29th May, 1665. I went with my little boy to my district in Kent, to make up accounts with my officers. Visited the Governor at Dover Castle, where were some of my prisoners.[Pg 6]
29th May, 1665. I went with my young son to my area in Kent to settle accounts with my officers. I visited the Governor at Dover Castle, where some of my prisoners were. [Pg 6]
3d June, 1665. In my return went to Gravesend; the fleets being just now engaged, gave special orders for my officers to be ready to receive the wounded and prisoners.
3rd June, 1665. On my way back, I went to Gravesend; with the fleets currently engaged, I gave specific instructions for my officers to be prepared to receive the wounded and prisoners.
5th June, 1665. To London, to speak with his Majesty and the Duke of Albemarle for horse and foot guards for the prisoners at war, committed more particularly to my charge by a commission apart.
5th June, 1665. To London, to speak with his Majesty and the Duke of Albemarle about getting horse and foot guards for the prisoners of war, specifically assigned to my responsibility through a separate commission.
8th June, 1665. I went again to his Grace, thence to the Council, and moved for another privy seal for £20,000, and that I might have the disposal of the Savoy Hospital for the sick and wounded; all which was granted. Hence to the Royal Society, to refresh among the philosophers.
8th June, 1665. I went to see his Grace again, then to the Council, and requested another privy seal for £20,000, as well as the authority to manage the Savoy Hospital for the sick and wounded; all of which was approved. From there, I headed to the Royal Society to catch up with the philosophers.
Came news of his highness's victory, which indeed might have been a complete one, and at once ended the war, had it been pursued, but the cowardice of some, or treachery, or both, frustrated that. We had, however, bonfires, bells, and rejoicing in the city. Next day, the 9th, I had instant orders to repair to the Downs, so as I got to Rochester this evening. Next day I lay at Deal, where I found all in readiness: but, the fleet being hindered by contrary winds, I came away on the 12th, and went to Dover, and returned to Deal; and on the 13th, hearing the fleet was at Solbay, I went homeward, and lay at Chatham, and on the 14th, I got home. On the 15th, came the eldest son of the present Secretary of State to the French King, with much other company, to dine with me. After dinner, I went with him to London, to speak to my Lord General for more guards, and gave his Majesty an account of my journey to the coasts under my inspection. I also waited on his Royal Highness, now come triumphant from the fleet, gotten into repair. See the whole history of this conflict in my "History of the Dutch War."
News came in about his highness's victory, which could have been a total win that ended the war if it had been followed up on, but the cowardice of some, or betrayal, or both, ruined that. We still had bonfires, bells, and celebrations in the city. The next day, the 9th, I received immediate orders to head to the Downs, so I reached Rochester that evening. The following day I stayed at Deal, where everything was in place, but the fleet was stuck due to strong winds, so I left on the 12th and went to Dover, then returned to Deal. On the 13th, hearing that the fleet was in Solbay, I headed home and stayed at Chatham, and on the 14th, I finally got home. On the 15th, the eldest son of the current Secretary of State to the French King, along with several guests, came to have dinner with me. After dinner, I took him to London to speak with my Lord General about getting more guards, and I reported to his Majesty about my trip to the coasts under my supervision. I also paid a visit to his Royal Highness, who had returned victorious from the fleet and was getting things back in shape. You can read the full account of this conflict in my "History of the Dutch War."
20th June, 1665. To London, and represented the state of the sick and wounded to His Majesty in Council, for want of money, he ordered I should apply to My Lord Treasurer and Chancellor of the Exchequer, upon what funds to raise the money promised. We also presented to his Majesty divers expedients for retrenchment of the charge.
20th June, 1665. I went to London and explained the situation of the sick and wounded to His Majesty in Council. Due to a lack of funds, he instructed me to approach My Lord Treasurer and Chancellor of the Exchequer about the sources to secure the promised money. We also presented various suggestions to His Majesty for reducing expenses.
This evening making my court to the Duke, I spake to Monsieur Comminges, the French Ambassador, and his[Pg 7] Highness granted me six prisoners, Embdeners, who were desirous to go to the Barbadoes with a merchant.
This evening, while I was presenting myself to the Duke, I spoke with Monsieur Comminges, the French Ambassador, and his[Pg 7]Highness gave me six prisoners, Embdeners, who wanted to go to Barbados with a merchant.
22d June, 1665. We waited on the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and got an Order of Council for our money to be paid to the Treasurer of the Navy for our Receivers.
22d June, 1665. We met with the Chancellor of the Exchequer and received an Order of Council for our funds to be paid to the Treasurer of the Navy for our Receivers.
23d June, 1665. I dined with Sir Robert Paston, since Earl of Yarmouth, and saw the Duke of Verneuille, base brother to the Queen-Mother, a handsome old man, a great hunter.
23rd June, 1665. I had dinner with Sir Robert Paston, who later became the Earl of Yarmouth, and I met the Duke of Verneuille, the illegitimate brother of the Queen Mother, a handsome older man and an avid hunter.
The Duke of York told us that, when we were in fight, his dog sought out absolutely the very securest place in all the vessel.—In the afternoon, I saw the pompous reception and audience of El Conde de Molino, the Spanish Ambassador, in the Banqueting-house, both their Majesties sitting together under the canopy of state.
The Duke of York told us that during the fight, his dog found the safest spot on the whole ship. In the afternoon, I witnessed the grand welcome and meeting of El Conde de Molino, the Spanish Ambassador, in the Banqueting House, with both their Majesties sitting together under the royal canopy.
30th June, 1665. To Chatham; and, 1st July, to the fleet with Lord Sandwich, now Admiral, with whom I went in a pinnace to the Buoy of the Nore, where the whole fleet rode at anchor; went on board the Prince, of ninety brass ordnance, haply the best ship in the world, both for building and sailing; she had 700 men. They made a great huzza, or shout, at our approach, three times. Here we dined with many noblemen, gentlemen, and volunteers, served in plate and excellent meat of all sorts. After dinner, came his Majesty, the Duke, and Prince Rupert. Here I saw the King knight Captain Custance for behaving so bravely in the late fight. It was surprising to behold the good order, decency, and plenty of all things in a vessel so full of men. The ship received a hundred cannon shot in her body. Then I went on board the Charles, to which after a gun was shot off, came all the flag officers to his Majesty, who there held a General Council, which determined that his Royal Highness should adventure himself no more this summer. I came away late, having seen the most glorious fleet that ever spread sails. We returned in his Majesty's yacht with my Lord Sandwich and Mr. Vice-Chamberlain, landing at Chatham on Sunday morning.
30th June, 1665. I traveled to Chatham; and on 1st July, I joined the fleet with Lord Sandwich, now Admiral. We took a small boat to the Buoy of the Nore, where the whole fleet was anchored. I boarded the Prince, equipped with ninety brass cannons, arguably the best ship in the world for both construction and sailing; it housed 700 men. They cheered loudly three times at our arrival. We dined with many noblemen, gentlemen, and volunteers, served on fine dishes with excellent food of all kinds. After dinner, the King, the Duke, and Prince Rupert arrived. Here, I witnessed the King knight Captain Custance for his bravery in the recent battle. It was impressive to see the good order, decency, and abundance of everything on a ship so crowded with men. The vessel had taken a hundred cannon shots to its hull. Then, I boarded the Charles. After a cannon was fired, all the flag officers came to see the King, who held a General Council there, which decided that his Royal Highness should not risk himself any further this summer. I left late, having seen the most magnificent fleet that ever set sail. We returned in the King's yacht with Lord Sandwich and Mr. Vice-Chamberlain, landing at Chatham on Sunday morning.
5th July, 1665. I took order for 150 men, who had been recovered of their wounds, to be carried on board the Clove Tree, Carolus Quintus, and Zealand, ships that had been taken by us in the fight; and so returned home.
5th July, 1665. I arranged for 150 men, who had healed from their wounds, to be transported on board the Clove Tree, Carolus Quintus, and Zealand, ships that we had captured during the battle; and then returned home.
7th July, 1665. To London, to Sir William Coventry;[Pg 8] and so to Sion, where his Majesty sat at Council during the contagion: when business was over, I viewed that seat belonging to the Earl of Northumberland, built out of an old nunnery, of stone, and fair enough, but more celebrated for the garden than it deserves; yet there is excellent wall-fruit, and a pretty fountain; nothing else extraordinary.
7th July, 1665. To London, to Sir William Coventry;[Pg 8] and then to Sion, where the King held Council during the plague: when the meeting was done, I checked out the seat that belongs to the Earl of Northumberland, which was built from an old nunnery, made of stone, and quite nice, but more famous for its garden than it really deserves; still, there’s excellent wall fruit and a nice fountain; nothing else remarkable.
9th July, 1665. I went to Hampton-Court, where now the whole Court was, to solicit for money; to carry intercepted letters; confer again with Sir William Coventry, the Duke's secretary; and so home, having dined with Mr. Secretary Morice.
9th July, 1665. I went to Hampton Court, where the entire Court was, to ask for money; to deliver intercepted letters; to meet again with Sir William Coventry, the Duke's secretary; and then home, having had lunch with Mr. Secretary Morice.
16th July, 1665. There died of the plague in London this week 1,100; and in the week following, above 2,000. Two houses were shut up in our parish.
16th July, 1665. This week, 1,100 people died of the plague in London; and in the following week, over 2,000. Two houses were quarantined in our parish.
2d August, 1665. A solemn fast through England to deprecate God's displeasure against the land by pestilence and war; our Doctor preaching on 26 Levit. v. 41, 42, that the means to obtain remission of punishment was not to repine at it; but humbly to submit to it.
2nd August, 1665. A serious day of fasting across England to seek God's mercy against the plague and war; our Doctor preaching on Leviticus 26:41, 42, emphasizing that the way to gain forgiveness for punishment is not to complain about it, but to humbly accept it.
3d August, 1665. Came his Grace the Duke of Albemarle, Lord General of all his Majesty's forces, to visit me, and carried me to dine with him.
3d August, 1665. His Grace the Duke of Albemarle, Lord General of all his Majesty's forces, came to visit me and took me to dine with him.
4th August, 1665. I went to Wotton with my Son and his tutor, Mr. Bohun, Fellow of New College (recommended to me by Dr. Wilkins, and the President of New College, Oxford), for fear of the pestilence, still increasing in London and its environs. On my return, I called at Durdans, where I found Dr. Wilkins, Sir William Petty, and Mr. Hooke, contriving chariots, new rigging for ships, a wheel for one to run races in, and other mechanical inventions; perhaps three such persons together were not to be found elsewhere in Europe, for parts and ingenuity.
4th August, 1665. I went to Wotton with my son and his tutor, Mr. Bohun, a Fellow of New College (who was recommended to me by Dr. Wilkins and the President of New College, Oxford), because I was worried about the plague, which was still spreading in London and the surrounding areas. On my way back, I stopped by Durdans, where I found Dr. Wilkins, Sir William Petty, and Mr. Hooke working on chariots, new ship rigging, a wheel for racing, and other mechanical inventions; you probably couldn't find three people like them anywhere else in Europe, thanks to their skill and creativity.
8th August, 1665. I waited on the Duke of Albemarle, who was resolved to stay at the Cock-pit, in St. James's Park. Died this week in London, 4,000.
8th August, 1665. I visited the Duke of Albemarle, who decided to stay at the Cock-pit in St. James's Park. This week in London, 4,000 people died.
15th August, 1665. There perished this week 5,000.
15th August, 1665. This week, 5,000 people died.
28th August, 1665. The contagion still increasing, and growing now all about us, I sent my wife and whole family (two or three necessary servants excepted) to my brother's at Wotton, being resolved to stay at my house myself, and to look after my charge, trusting in the providence and goodness of God.[Pg 9]
28th August, 1665. The outbreak is still getting worse and is now spreading everywhere around us. I sent my wife and the whole family (except for two or three essential servants) to my brother's house in Wotton, while I decided to stay at my own home and take care of my responsibilities, trusting in God's providence and goodness.[Pg 9]
5th September, 1665. To Chatham, to inspect my charge, with £900 in my coach.
5th September, 1665. I went to Chatham to check on my responsibilities, with £900 in my coach.
7th September, 1665. Came home, there perishing near 10,000 poor creatures weekly; however, I went all along the city and suburbs from Kent Street to St. James's, a dismal passage, and dangerous to see so many coffins exposed in the streets, now thin of people; the shops shut up, and all in mournful silence, not knowing whose turn might be next. I went to the Duke of Albemarle for a pest-ship, to wait on our infected men, who were not a few.
7th September, 1665. I came home to find nearly 10,000 poor people dying each week; still, I walked through the city and the suburbs from Kent Street to St. James's—a grim journey, and it was unsettling to see so many coffins out in the streets, with the population visibly reduced. The shops were closed, and everything was wrapped in a mournful silence, with everyone unsure of who might be next. I went to the Duke of Albemarle to request a pest ship to assist our infected men, who were not few in number.
14th September, 1665. I went to Wotton; and on 16th September, to visit old Secretary Nicholas, being now at his new purchase of West Horsley, once mortgaged to me by Lord Viscount Montague: a pretty dry seat on the Down. Returned to Wotton.
14th September, 1665. I went to Wotton; and on 16th September, I visited the old Secretary Nicholas, who is now at his new place in West Horsley, which was once mortgaged to me by Lord Viscount Montague: a nice dry spot on the Downs. Returned to Wotton.
17th September, 1665. Receiving a letter from Lord Sandwich of a defeat given to the Dutch, I was forced to travel all Sunday. I was exceedingly perplexed to find that near 3,000 prisoners were sent to me to dispose of, being more than I had places fit to receive and guard.
17th September, 1665. After getting a letter from Lord Sandwich about a victory over the Dutch, I had to travel all Sunday. I was very confused to discover that nearly 3,000 prisoners were sent to me to manage, which was more than I had the facilities to accommodate and secure.
25th September, 1665. My Lord Admiral being come from the fleet to Greenwich, I went thence with him to the Cock-pit, to consult with the Duke of Albemarle. I was peremptory that, unless we had £10,000 immediately, the prisoners would starve, and it was proposed it should be raised out of the East India prizes now taken by Lord Sandwich. They being but two of the commission, and so not empowered to determine, sent an express to his Majesty and Council, to know what they should do. In the meantime, I had five vessels, with competent guards, to keep the prisoners in for the present, to be placed as I should think best. After dinner (which was at the General's) I went over to visit his Grace, the Archbishop of Canterbury, at Lambeth.
25th September, 1665. My Lord Admiral returned from the fleet to Greenwich, and I went with him to the Cock-pit to consult the Duke of Albemarle. I insisted that unless we got £10,000 right away, the prisoners would starve, and it was suggested that the funds should come from the East India prizes recently captured by Lord Sandwich. As they were only two of the commissioners and not authorized to make a decision, they sent an urgent message to His Majesty and the Council to find out what to do. In the meantime, I had five ships with adequate guards to hold the prisoners for now, to be arranged as I saw fit. After dinner (which was at the General's), I went to visit His Grace, the Archbishop of Canterbury, at Lambeth.
28th September, 1665. To the General again, to acquaint him of the deplorable state of our men for want of provisions; returned with orders.
28th September, 1665. To the General again, to inform him of the terrible condition of our men due to lack of supplies; returned with orders.
29th September, 1665. To Erith, to quicken the sale of the prizes lying there, with order to the commissioner who lay on board till they should be disposed of, £5,000 being proportioned for my quarter. Then I delivered the Dutch[Pg 10] Vice-Admiral, who was my prisoner, to Mr. Lo....2 of the Marshalsea, he giving me bond in £500 to produce him at my call. I exceedingly pitied this brave unhappy person, who had lost with these prizes £40,000 after twenty years' negotiation [trading] in the East Indies. I dined in one of these vessels, of 1,200 tons, full of riches.
29th September, 1665. I went to Erith to speed up the sale of the prizes there, giving instructions to the commissioner who was on board until they were sold, with £5,000 allocated for my share. Then, I handed over the Dutch Vice-Admiral, who was my prisoner, to Mr. Lo....2 of the Marshalsea, who provided me with a £500 bond to present him whenever I needed. I really felt for this brave, unfortunate man, who had lost £40,000 along with these prizes after twenty years of trading in the East Indies. I had dinner on one of these ships, which was 1,200 tons and filled with treasures.
1st October, 1665. This afternoon, while at evening prayers, tidings were brought me of the birth of a daughter at Wotton, after six sons, in the same chamber I had first taken breath in, and at the first day of that month, as I was on the last, forty-five years before.
1st October, 1665. This afternoon, during evening prayers, I was informed of the birth of a daughter in Wotton, following six sons, in the same room where I was born, and on the first day of this month, just like I was forty-five years ago.
4th October, 1665. The monthly fast.
4th October, 1665. The monthly fast.
11th October, 1665. To London, and went through the whole city, having occasion to alight out of the coach in several places about business of money, when I was environed with multitudes of poor, pestiferous creatures begging alms; the shops universally shut up, a dreadful prospect! I dined with my Lord General; was to receive £10,000, and had guards to convey both myself and it, and so returned home, through God's infinite mercy.
11th October, 1665. I went to London and traveled through the entire city, getting out of the coach at several places for money-related business, when I was surrounded by crowds of poor, sick people begging for help; the shops were all closed, what a terrible sight! I had lunch with my Lord General; I was supposed to receive £10,000 and had guards to escort both me and the money, and I returned home safely, thanks to God's infinite mercy.
17th October, 1665. I went to Gravesend; next day to Chatham; thence to Maidstone, in order to the march of 500 prisoners to Leeds Castle, which I had hired of Lord Culpeper. I was earnestly desired by the learned Sir Roger Twisden, and Deputy-Lieutenants, to spare Maidstone from quartering any of my sick flock. Here, Sir Edward Brett sent me some horse to bring up the rear. This country, from Rochester to Maidstone and the Downs, is very agreeable for the prospect.
17th October, 1665. I went to Gravesend; the next day to Chatham; then to Maidstone, to oversee the march of 500 prisoners to Leeds Castle, which I had rented from Lord Culpeper. I was strongly encouraged by the respected Sir Roger Twisden and the Deputy-Lieutenants to avoid putting any of my sick people in Maidstone. Here, Sir Edward Brett sent me some horses to help with the rear. This area, from Rochester to Maidstone and the Downs, is quite pleasant for the view.
21st October, 1665. I came from Gravesend, where Sir J. Griffith, the Governor of the Fort, entertained me very handsomely.
21st October, 1665. I arrived from Gravesend, where Sir J. Griffith, the Governor of the Fort, hosted me very generously.
31st October, 1665. I was this day forty-five years of age wonderfully preserved; for which I blessed God for his infinite goodness toward me.
31st October, 1665. Today I turned forty-five years old, remarkably well-preserved; for this, I thanked God for His endless goodness towards me.
23d November, 1665. Went home, the contagion having now decreased considerably.
23rd November, 1665. Went home, the outbreak having now decreased significantly.
27th November, 1665. The Duke of Albemarle was going to Oxford, where both Court and Parliament had been most part of the summer. There was no small suspicion of my Lord Sandwich having permitted divers commanders, who were at the taking of the East India[Pg 11] prizes, to break bulk, and to take to themselves jewels, silks, etc.: though I believe some whom I could name filled their pockets, my Lord Sandwich himself had the least share. However, he underwent the blame, and it created him enemies, and prepossessed the Lord General, for he spoke to me of it with much zeal and concern, and I believe laid load enough on Lord Sandwich at Oxford.
27th November, 1665. The Duke of Albemarle was heading to Oxford, where both the Court and Parliament had spent most of the summer. There was considerable suspicion that Lord Sandwich had allowed several commanders involved in the capture of the East India[Pg 11] prizes to pilfer gems, silks, and other valuables for themselves; although I could name a few who definitely stuffed their pockets, Lord Sandwich had the smallest share. Still, he took on the blame, which made him some enemies and got the Lord General’s attention, as he spoke to me about it with great passion and concern, and I believe he laid quite a bit of blame on Lord Sandwich in Oxford.
8th December, 1665. To my Lord of Albemarle (now returned from Oxford), who was declared General at Sea, to the no small mortification of that excellent person, the Earl of Sandwich, whom the Duke of Albemarle not only suspected faulty about the prizes, but less valiant; himself imagining how easy a thing it were to confound the Hollanders, as well now as heretofore he fought against them upon a more disloyal interest.
8th December, 1665. To my Lord of Albemarle (now back from Oxford), who was named Admiral, much to the embarrassment of the remarkable Earl of Sandwich, whom the Duke of Albemarle not only suspected of being at fault regarding the prizes but also less brave; imagining how simple it would be to outsmart the Dutch, just as he had fought against them before for less honorable reasons.
25th December, 1665. Kept Christmas with my hospitable brother, at Wotton.
25th December, 1665. Spent Christmas with my generous brother at Wotton.
30th December, 1665. To Woodcot, where I supped at my Lady Mordaunt's at Ashsted, where was a room hung with pintado, full of figures great and small, prettily representing sundry trades and occupations of the Indians, with their habits; here supped also Dr. Duke, a learned and facetious gentleman.
30th December, 1665. To Woodcot, where I had dinner at Lady Mordaunt's in Ashsted, where there was a room decorated with pintado, filled with large and small figures that nicely depicted various trades and occupations of the Indians, along with their attire; Dr. Duke, a knowledgeable and humorous gentleman, also had dinner here.
31st December, 1665. Now blessed be God for his extraordinary mercies and preservation of me this year, when thousands, and ten thousands, perished, and were swept away on each side of me, there dying in our parish this year 406 of the pestilence!
31st December, 1665. Now thank God for His extraordinary mercy and for keeping me safe this year, as thousands and tens of thousands perished, with 406 people in our parish dying from the plague!
3d January, 1665-66. I supped in Nonesuch House,3 whither the office of the Exchequer was transferred during the plague, at my good friend Mr. Packer's, and took an exact view of the plaster statues and bass-relievos inserted between the timbers and puncheons of the outside walls of the Court; which must needs have been the work of some celebrated Italian. I much admired how they had lasted so well and entire since the time of Henry VIII., exposed as they are to the air; and pity it is they are not taken out and preserved in some dry place; a gallery would become them. There are some mezzo-relievos as big as the life; the story is of the Heathen[Pg 12] Gods, emblems, compartments, etc. The palace consists of two courts, of which the first is of stone, castle like, by the Lord Lumleys (of whom it was purchased), the other of timber, a Gothic fabric, but these walls incomparably beautiful. I observed that the appearing timber-puncheons, entrelices, etc., were all so covered with scales of slate, that it seemed carved in the wood and painted, the slate fastened on the timber in pretty figures, that has, like a coat of armor, preserved it from rotting. There stand in the garden two handsome stone pyramids, and the avenue planted with rows of fair elms, but the rest of these goodly trees, both of this and of Worcester Park adjoining, were felled by those destructive and avaricious rebels in the late war, which defaced one of the stateliest seats his Majesty had.
3rd January, 1665-66. I had dinner at Nonesuch House,3 where the office of the Exchequer was moved during the plague, hosted by my good friend Mr. Packer. I took a close look at the plaster statues and bas-reliefs set between the beams and panels of the exterior walls of the Court; they must have been created by some renowned Italian artist. I was impressed by how well they have survived since the time of Henry VIII., despite being exposed to the elements; it’s a shame they aren’t removed and kept in a dry place; they would look great in a gallery. There are some life-sized mezzo-reliefs depicting the pagan[Pg 12] gods, along with emblems and scenes. The palace has two courtyards, the first being a stone structure, castle-like, built by the Lord Lumleys (from whom it was purchased), and the second being a timber Gothic design, but the walls are incredibly beautiful. I noticed that the exposed timber beams and panels were all covered with slate scales, making it look like the wood was intricately carved and painted. The slate was attached to the timber in lovely patterns, acting like armor and protecting it from decay. In the garden stand two beautiful stone pyramids, and the path is lined with rows of elegant elms, but most of the splendid trees in this area and the nearby Worcester Park were cut down by those destructive and greedy rebels during the recent war, which ruined one of the grandest residences his Majesty had.
12th January, 1666. After much, and indeed extraordinary mirth and cheer, all my brothers, our wives, and children, being together, and after much sorrow and trouble during this contagion, which separated our families as well as others, I returned to my house, but my wife went back to Wotton. I, not as yet willing to adventure her, the contagion, though exceedingly abated, not as yet wholly extinguished among us.
12th January, 1666. After a lot of extraordinary fun and joy, I was with all my brothers, their wives, and children. After experiencing a lot of sadness and hardship during this outbreak, which kept our families apart along with others, I returned to my house, but my wife went back to Wotton. I wasn’t ready to risk her catching the lingering contagion, even though it had greatly decreased but was still not completely gone among us.
29th January, 1666. I went to wait on his Majesty, now returned from Oxford to Hampton-Court, where the Duke of Albemarle presented me to him; he ran toward me, and in a most gracious manner gave me his hand to kiss, with many thanks for my care and faithfulness in his service in a time of such great danger, when everybody fled their employments; he told me he was much obliged to me, and said he was several times concerned for me, and the peril I underwent, and did receive my service most acceptably (though in truth I did but do my duty, and O that I had performed it as I ought!). After this, his Majesty was pleased to talk with me alone, near an hour, of several particulars of my employment, and ordered me to attend him again on the Thursday following at Whitehall. Then the Duke came toward me, and embraced me with much kindness, telling me if he had thought my danger would have been so great, he would not have suffered his Majesty to employ me in that station. Then came to salute me my Lord of St. Albans, Lord Arlington, Sir William Coventry, and several great[Pg 13] persons; after which, I got home, not being very well in health.
29th January, 1666. I went to see His Majesty, who had just returned from Oxford to Hampton Court, where the Duke of Albemarle introduced me to him; he rushed toward me and graciously offered his hand to kiss, thanking me for my care and loyalty during such a dangerous time when everyone else had abandoned their duties. He expressed his gratitude, saying he was genuinely worried about me and the risks I faced, and that he appreciated my service (though honestly, I was just doing my job, and oh, how I wish I had done it as I ought!). After this, His Majesty kindly spent nearly an hour talking with me one-on-one about various aspects of my work and asked me to see him again the following Thursday at Whitehall. Then the Duke approached me and warmly embraced me, saying that if he had realized my danger would be so significant, he wouldn't have allowed His Majesty to assign me to that role. Soon after, my Lord of St. Albans, Lord Arlington, Sir William Coventry, and several other important figures came to greet me; after that, I went home, not feeling very well.
The Court was now in deep mourning for the French Queen-Mother.
The Court was now in deep mourning for the French Queen Mother.
2d February, 1666. To London; his Majesty now come to Whitehall, where I heard and saw my Lord Mayor (and brethren) make his speech of welcome, and the two Sheriffs were knighted.
2nd February, 1666. To London; his Majesty has now arrived at Whitehall, where I heard and saw my Lord Mayor (and his colleagues) give his welcome speech, and the two Sheriffs were knighted.
6th February, 1666. My wife and family returned to me from the country, where they had been since August, by reason of the contagion, now almost universally ceasing. Blessed be God for his infinite mercy in preserving us! I, having gone through so much danger, and lost so many of my poor officers, escaping still myself that I might live to recount and magnify his goodness to me.
6th February, 1666. My wife and family came back to me from the countryside, where they had been since August because of the outbreak, which is now nearly over. Thank God for His incredible mercy in keeping us safe! I have faced so much danger and lost many of my poor officers, yet I survived so that I could share and celebrate His goodness to me.
8th February, 1666. I had another gracious reception by his Majesty, who called me into his bed-chamber, to lay before and describe to him my project of an Infirmary, which I read to him, who with great approbation, recommended it to his Royal Highness.
8th February, 1666. I received another warm welcome from His Majesty, who invited me into his bedroom to present and explain my plan for an Infirmary. I read it to him, and he approved it highly and suggested it to his Royal Highness.
20th February, 1666. To the Commissioners of the Navy who, having seen the project of the Infirmary, encouraged the work, and were very earnest it should be set about immediately; but I saw no money, though a very moderate expense would have saved thousands to his Majesty, and been much more commodious for the cure and quartering of our sick and wounded, than the dispersing them into private houses, where many more chirurgeons and attendants were necessary, and the people tempted to debauchery.
20th February, 1666. To the Commissioners of the Navy who, after reviewing the Infirmary project, supported the initiative and emphasized the need to start it right away; however, I found no funding available, even though a relatively small investment would have saved the King thousands and provided a much better solution for treating and housing our sick and injured, compared to splitting them up among private homes, which required many more surgeons and staff, and often led the locals to engage in immoral behavior.
21st February, 1666. Went to my Lord Treasurer for an assignment of £40,000 upon the last two quarters for support of the next year's charge. Next day, to Duke of Albemarle and Secretary of State, to desire them to propose it to the Council.
21st February, 1666. Went to my Lord Treasurer for an assignment of £40,000 for the last two quarters to support next year's expenses. The next day, I met with the Duke of Albemarle and the Secretary of State to ask them to present it to the Council.
7th March, 1666. Dr. Sancroft, since Archbishop of Canterbury, preached before the King about the identity and immutability of God, on Psalm cii. 27.
7th March, 1666. Dr. Sancroft, who later became Archbishop of Canterbury, preached before the King about the nature and unchanging nature of God, based on Psalm 102:27.
13th March, 1666. To Chatham, to view a place designed for an Infirmary.[Pg 14]
13th March, 1666. I went to Chatham to check out a location intended for an Infirmary.[Pg 14]
15th March, 1666. My charge now amounted to near £7,000 [weekly].
15th March, 1666. My responsibility now totaled almost £7,000 [weekly].
22d March, 1666. The Royal Society reassembled, after the dispersion from the contagion.
22nd March, 1666. The Royal Society came together again after being scattered due to the outbreak.
24th March, 1666. Sent £2,000 to Chatham.
24th March, 1666. Sent £2,000 to Chatham.
1st April, 1666. To London, to consult about ordering the natural rarities belonging to the repository of the Royal Society; referred to a Committee.
1st April, 1666. I went to London to discuss arranging the natural wonders owned by the Royal Society’s collection; it was assigned to a Committee.
10th April, 1666. Visited Sir William D'Oyly, surprised with a fit of apoplexy, and in extreme danger.
10th April, 1666. I visited Sir William D'Oyly, who was shocked with a stroke and in serious danger.
11th April, 1666. Dr. Bathurst preached before the King, from "I say unto you all, watch"—a seasonable and most excellent discourse. When his Majesty came from chapel, he called to me in the lobby, and told me he must now have me sworn for a Justice of Peace (having long since made me of the Commission); which I declined as inconsistent with the other service I was engaged in, and humbly desired to be excused. After dinner, waiting on him, I gave him the first notice of the Spaniards referring the umpirage of the peace between them and Portugal to the French King, which came to me in a letter from France before the Secretaries of State had any news of it. After this, his Majesty again asked me if I had found out any able person about our parts that might supply my place of Justice of Peace (the office in the world I had most industriously avoided, in regard of the perpetual trouble thereof in these numerous parishes); on which I nominated one, whom the King commanded me to give immediate notice of to my Lord Chancellor, and I should be excused; for which I rendered his Majesty many thanks. From thence, I went to the Royal Society, where I was chosen by twenty-seven voices to be one of their Council for the ensuing year; but, upon my earnest suit in respect of my other affairs, I got to be excused—and so home.
11th April, 1666. Dr. Bathurst preached before the King, using the text "I say unto you all, watch"—a timely and outstanding sermon. When the King came out of the chapel, he called to me in the lobby and told me he needed to swear me in as a Justice of the Peace (since he had already appointed me to the Commission); I declined, saying it conflicted with the other duties I was engaged in and humbly asked to be excused. After dinner, while attending him, I gave him the first word about the Spaniards referring the mediation for peace between them and Portugal to the French King, which I received in a letter from France before the Secretaries of State had any news about it. Afterwards, the King again asked me if I had found someone capable in our area who could take my place as Justice of the Peace (the position I had most eagerly avoided due to the constant hassle it involved in these many parishes); I suggested someone, and the King instructed me to immediately inform my Lord Chancellor, assuring me I would be excused; for which I expressed my gratitude to His Majesty. From there, I went to the Royal Society, where I was elected by twenty-seven votes to be one of their Council for the upcoming year; however, after I earnestly asked to be excused due to my other commitments, I was granted that request—and then went home.
15th April, 1666. Our parish was now more infected with the plague than ever, and so was all the country about, though almost quite ceased at London.
15th April, 1666. Our parish was now more affected by the plague than ever, and so was the surrounding countryside, although it had nearly stopped in London.
24th April, 1666. To London about our Mint-Commission, and sat in the inner Court of Wards.
24th April, 1666. Went to London for our Mint Commission and sat in the inner Court of Wards.
8th May, 1666. To Queensborough, where finding the Richmond frigate, I sailed to the buoy of the Nore to my Lord-General and Prince Rupert, where was the Rendezvous of the most glorious fleet in the world, now prepar[Pg 15]ing to meet the Hollander. Went to visit my cousin, Hales, at a sweetly-watered place at Chilston, near Bockton. The next morning, to Leeds Castle, once a famous hold, now hired by me of my Lord Culpeper for a prison. Here I flowed the dry moat, made a new drawbridge, brought spring water into the court of the Castle to an old fountain, and took order for the repairs.
8th May, 1666. I went to Queensborough, where I found the Richmond frigate and sailed to the buoy of the Nore to meet my Lord-General and Prince Rupert, where the most glorious fleet in the world was gathering to confront the Dutch. I visited my cousin, Hales, at a lovely spot in Chilston, near Bockton. The next morning, I went to Leeds Castle, which was once a famous stronghold but is now rented by me from my Lord Culpeper to use as a prison. Here, I filled the dry moat, built a new drawbridge, brought spring water into the castle courtyard to an old fountain, and arranged for repairs.
22d May, 1666. Waited on my Lord Chancellor at his new palace; and Lord Berkeley's built next to it.
22nd May, 1666. Met with my Lord Chancellor at his new palace, as well as Lord Berkeley's palace built right next to it.
24th May, 1666. Dined with Lord Cornbury, now made Lord Chamberlain to the Queen; who kept a very honorable table.
24th May, 1666. Had dinner with Lord Cornbury, who has now become Lord Chamberlain to the Queen; he hosted a very respectable dinner.
1st June, 1666. Being in my garden at 6 o'clock in the evening, and hearing the great guns go thick off, I took horse and rode that night to Rochester; thence next day toward the Downs and seacoast, but meeting the Lieutenant of the Hampshire frigate, who told me what passed, or rather what had not passed, I returned to London, there being no noise, or appearance at Deal, or on that coast of any engagement. Recounting this to his Majesty, whom I found at St. James's Park, impatiently expecting, and knowing that Prince Rupert was loose about three at St. Helen's Point at N. of the Isle of Wight, it greatly rejoiced him; but he was astonished when I assured him they heard nothing of the guns in the Downs, nor did the Lieutenant who landed there by five that morning.
1st June, 1666. While I was in my garden at 6 o'clock in the evening and hearing the cannon fire frequently, I took my horse and rode that night to Rochester. The next day, I headed toward the Downs and the seacoast, but I ran into the Lieutenant of the Hampshire frigate, who informed me about what had happened—or rather, what hadn’t happened—so I returned to London since there was no sound or sign of any conflict at Deal or along that coast. When I recounted this to His Majesty, whom I found at St. James's Park, anxiously waiting and knowing that Prince Rupert was at large around three at St. Helen's Point north of the Isle of Wight, it made him very happy. However, he was shocked when I assured him that they had heard nothing from the guns in the Downs, nor had the Lieutenant, who landed there at five that morning.
3d June, 1666. Whitsunday. After sermon came news that the Duke of Albemarle was still in fight, and had been all Saturday, and that Captain Harman's ship (the Henry) was like to be burnt. Then a letter from Mr. Bertie that Prince Rupert was come up with his squadron (according to my former advice of his being loose and in the way), and put new courage into our fleet, now in a manner yielding ground; so that now we were chasing the chasers; that the Duke of Albemarle was slightly wounded, and the rest still in great danger. So, having been much wearied with my journey, I slipped home, the guns still roaring very fiercely.
3rd June, 1666. Whitsun. After the sermon, we heard that the Duke of Albemarle was still in battle and had been all Saturday, and that Captain Harman's ship (the Henry) was likely to catch fire. Then I received a letter from Mr. Bertie that Prince Rupert had arrived with his squadron (just as I had previously mentioned he would), which gave our fleet a boost of courage, as they were now starting to lose ground. So now we were chasing the ones who were chasing us; the Duke of Albemarle was slightly injured, and the others were still in serious danger. Having been quite exhausted from my journey, I went home while the cannons continued to roar fiercely.
5th June, 1666. I went this morning to London, where came several particulars of the fight.
5th June, 1666. I went to London this morning, where I heard several details about the fight.
6th June, 1666. Came Sir Daniel Harvey from the General and related the dreadful encounter, on which his[Pg 16] Majesty commanded me to dispatch an extraordinary physician and more chirurgeons. It was on the solemn Fast-day when the news came; his Majesty being in the chapel made a sudden stop to hear the relation, which being with much advantage on our side, his Majesty commanded that public thanks should immediately be given as for a victory. The Dean of the chapel going down to give notice of it to the other Dean officiating; and notice was likewise sent to St. Paul's and Westminster Abbey. But this was no sooner over, than news came that our loss was very great both in ships and men; that the Prince frigate was burnt, and as noble a vessel of ninety brass guns lost; and the taking of Sir George Ayscue, and exceeding shattering of both fleets; so as both being obstinate, both parted rather for want of ammunition and tackle than courage; our General retreating like a lion; which exceedingly abated of our former joy. There were, however, orders given for bonfires and bells; but, God knows, it was rather a deliverance than a triumph. So much it pleased God to humble our late overconfidence that nothing could withstand the Duke of Albemarle, who, in good truth, made too forward a reckoning of his success now, because he had once beaten the Dutch in another quarrel; and being ambitious to outdo the Earl of Sandwich, whom he had prejudicated as deficient in courage.
6th June, 1666. Sir Daniel Harvey came from the General to report the terrible encounter, on which his Majesty ordered me to send an extraordinary physician and more surgeons. It was on the solemn Fast-day when the news arrived; his Majesty, being in the chapel, paused to listen to the account, which favored us significantly. Therefore, his Majesty commanded that public thanks should be given immediately, as if it were a victory. The Dean of the chapel went down to inform the other Dean on duty; notices were also sent to St. Paul’s and Westminster Abbey. However, as soon as that was over, news came that our losses were substantial, both in ships and men; the Prince frigate was burned, and we lost a notable vessel with ninety bronze guns; there was the capture of Sir George Ayscue and a severe pounding of both fleets. Both sides were stubborn, parting more from a lack of ammunition and resources than from lack of courage; our General retreated like a lion, which greatly diminished our earlier joy. Still, orders were issued for bonfires and ringing bells; but, God knows, it felt more like a deliverance than a triumph. God humbled our recent overconfidence so much that nothing could withstand the Duke of Albemarle, who, in truth, had reckoned too confidently on his success now because he had previously beaten the Dutch in another conflict and wanted to outperform the Earl of Sandwich, whom he believed was lacking in bravery.
7th June, 1666. I sent more chirurgeons, linen, medicaments, etc., to the several ports in my district.
7th June, 1666. I sent more surgeons, linen, medications, etc., to the various ports in my area.
8th June, 1666. Dined with me Sir Alexander Fraser, prime physician to his Majesty; afterward, went on board his Majesty's pleasure-boat, when I saw the London frigate launched, a most stately ship, built by the City to supply that which was burnt by accident some time since; the King, Lord Mayor and Sheriffs, being there with great banquet.
8th June, 1666. I had lunch with Sir Alexander Fraser, the king's chief physician. Later, we boarded the king's pleasure boat, where I saw the launch of the London frigate, a magnificent ship built by the city to replace the one that was accidentally destroyed some time ago. The king, the Lord Mayor, and the Sheriffs were present for a grand banquet.
11th June, 1666. Trinity Monday, after a sermon, applied to the remeeting of the Corporation of the Trinity-House, after the late raging and wasting pestilence: I dined with them in their new room in Deptford, the first time since it was rebuilt.
11th June, 1666. Trinity Monday, after a sermon, I attended the meeting of the Corporation of the Trinity-House, following the recent devastating plague. I had lunch with them in their new room in Deptford, the first time since it was reconstructed.
15th June, 1666. I went to Chatham.—16th. In the Jemmy yacht (an incomparable sailer) to sea, arrived by noon at the fleet at the Buoy at the Nore, dined with Prince Rupert and the General.[Pg 17]
15th June, 1666. I went to Chatham.—16th. On the Jemmy yacht (an amazing sailing boat) to sea, arrived by noon at the fleet at the Buoy at the Nore, dined with Prince Rupert and the General.[Pg 17]
17th June, 1666. Came his Majesty, the Duke, and many Noblemen. After Council, we went to prayers. My business being dispatched, I returned to Chatham, having lain but one night in the Royal Charles; we had a tempestuous sea. I went on shore at Sheerness, where they were building an arsenal for the fleet, and designing a royal fort with a receptacle for great ships to ride at anchor; but here I beheld the sad spectacle, more than half that gallant bulwark of the kingdom miserably shattered, hardly a vessel entire, but appearing rather so many wrecks and hulls, so cruelly had the Dutch mangled us. The loss of the Prince, that gallant vessel, had been a loss to be universally deplored, none knowing for what reason we first engaged in this ungrateful war; we lost besides nine or ten more, and near 600 men slain and 1,100 wounded, 2,000 prisoners; to balance which, perhaps we might destroy eighteen or twenty of the enemy's ships, and 700 or 800 poor men.
June 17, 1666. His Majesty, the Duke, and many noblemen arrived. After the council, we went to pray. Once my business was taken care of, I went back to Chatham, having spent just one night on the Royal Charles; the sea was stormy. I disembarked at Sheerness, where they were constructing an arsenal for the fleet and planning a royal fort with a docking area for large ships to anchor. But here I witnessed a heartbreaking sight: more than half of that proud defense of the kingdom was terribly destroyed, with hardly a ship intact, looking more like wrecks and hulls, so brutally had the Dutch attacked us. The loss of the Prince, that brave ship, was a tragedy that everyone lamented, as no one understood why we got into this thankless war in the first place. We also lost nine or ten more ships, nearly 600 men were killed, and 1,100 were wounded, with 2,000 taken prisoner; in return, we might have sunk eighteen or twenty of the enemy's ships and around 700 or 800 men.
18th June, 1666. Weary of this sad sight, I returned home.
18th June, 1666. Tired of this grim scene, I went back home.
2d July, 1666. Came Sir John Duncomb and Mr. Thomas Chicheley, both Privy Councillors and Commissioners of His Majesty's Ordnance, to visit me, and let me know that his Majesty had in Council, nominated me to be one of the Commissioners for regulating the farming and making of saltpetre through the whole kingdom, and that we were to sit in the Tower the next day. When they were gone, came to see me Sir John Cotton, heir to the famous antiquary, Sir Robert Cotton: a pretended great Grecian, but had by no means the parts, or genius of his grandfather.
2nd July, 1666. Sir John Duncomb and Mr. Thomas Chicheley, both Privy Councillors and Commissioners of His Majesty's Ordnance, came to visit me and informed me that His Majesty had nominated me in Council to be one of the Commissioners responsible for regulating the production and distribution of saltpetre throughout the kingdom, and that we were to meet in the Tower the following day. After they left, Sir John Cotton, the heir to the renowned antiquarian Sir Robert Cotton, came to see me; he claimed to be a great Greek scholar, but he definitely didn’t have the talent or intellect of his grandfather.
3d July, 1666. I went to sit with the Commissioners at the Tower, where our commission being read, we made some progress in business, our Secretary being Sir George Wharton, that famous mathematician who wrote the yearly Almanac during his Majesty's troubles. Thence, to Painters' Hall, to our other commission, and dined at my Lord Mayor's.
3rd July, 1666. I went to meet with the Commissioners at the Tower, where we read our commission and made some progress on business, with our Secretary being Sir George Wharton, the well-known mathematician who wrote the annual Almanac during the King's troubles. From there, we went to Painters' Hall for our other commission and had dinner at the Lord Mayor's.
4th July, 1666. The solemn Fast-day. Dr. Meggot preached an excellent discourse before the King on the terrors of God's judgments. After sermon, I waited on my Lord Archbishop of Canterbury and Bishop of Winchester, where the Dean of Westminster spoke to me[Pg 18] about putting into my hands the disposal of fifty pounds, which the charitable people of Oxford had sent to be distributed among the sick and wounded seamen since the battle. Hence, I went to the Lord Chancellor's to joy him of his Royal Highness's second son, now born at St. James's; and to desire the use of the Star-chamber for our Commissioners to meet in, Painters' Hall not being so convenient.
4th July, 1666. The solemn Fast-day. Dr. Meggot preached an excellent sermon before the King about the fears of God's judgments. After the sermon, I visited my Lord Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of Winchester, where the Dean of Westminster talked to me[Pg 18] about handing out fifty pounds that the kind people of Oxford had sent to help the sick and injured sailors since the battle. Then, I went to the Lord Chancellor's to congratulate him on the birth of his Royal Highness's second son at St. James's and to request the use of the Star-chamber for our Commissioners to meet in, as Painters' Hall wasn't as convenient.
12th July, 1666. We sat the first time in the Star-chamber. There was now added to our commission Sir George Downing (one that had been a great ... against his Majesty, but now insinuated into his favor; and, from a pedagogue and fanatic preacher, not worth a groat, had become excessively rich), to inspect the hospitals and treat about prisons.
12th July, 1666. We sat for the first time in the Star-chamber. Now our commission included Sir George Downing (someone who had once been very much against his Majesty, but had now worked his way into his good graces; and, going from being a teacher and a fanatical preacher, who was worth very little, he had become extremely wealthy), to oversee the hospitals and discuss matters regarding prisons.
14th July, 1666. Sat at the Tower with Sir J. Duncomb and Lord Berkeley, to sign deputations for undertakers to furnish their proportions of saltpetre.
14th July, 1666. Sat at the Tower with Sir J. Duncomb and Lord Berkeley, to sign documents for contractors to provide their share of saltpeter.
17th July, 1666. To London, to prepare for the next engagement of the fleets, now gotten to sea again.
17th July, 1666. Headed to London to get ready for the next battle of the fleets, which are back at sea again.
22d July, 1666. Our parish still infected with the contagion.
22nd July, 1666. Our parish is still affected by the outbreak.
25th July, 1666. The fleets engaged. I dined at Lord Berkeley's, at St. James's, where dined my Lady Harrietta Hyde, Lord Arlington, and Sir John Duncomb.
25th July, 1666. The fleets engaged. I had dinner at Lord Berkeley's in St. James's, where Lady Harrietta Hyde, Lord Arlington, and Sir John Duncomb also dined.
29th July, 1666. The pestilence now fresh increasing in our parish, I forbore going to church. In the afternoon came tidings of our victory over the Dutch, sinking some, and driving others aground, and into their ports.
29th July, 1666. With the plague now on the rise in our parish, I decided not to go to church. In the afternoon, news came of our victory over the Dutch, sinking some ships and forcing others aground and into their ports.
1st August, 1666. I went to Dr. Keffler, who married the daughter of the famous chemist, Drebbell,4 inventor of the bodied scarlet. I went to see his iron ovens, made portable (formerly) for the Prince of Orange's army: supped at the Rhenish Wine-House with divers Scots gentlemen.
1st August, 1666. I visited Dr. Keffler, who married the daughter of the well-known chemist, Drebbell,4 inventor of the deep red dye. I went to check out his portable iron ovens, which were previously made for the Prince of Orange's army; then I had dinner at the Rhenish Wine-House with several Scottish gentlemen.
6th August, 1666. Dined with Mr. Povey, and then went[Pg 19] with him to see a country house he had bought near Brentford; returning by Kensington; which house stands to a very graceful avenue of trees, but it is an ordinary building, especially one part.
6th August, 1666. Had dinner with Mr. Povey, and then went[Pg 19] with him to check out a country house he had bought near Brentford; returning by Kensington; this house is set along a really nice tree-lined avenue, but it's just an ordinary building, particularly one section.
8th August, 1666. Dined at Sir Stephen Fox's with several friends and, on the 10th, with Mr. Odart, Secretary of the Latin tongue.
8th August, 1666. Had dinner at Sir Stephen Fox's with several friends and, on the 10th, with Mr. Odart, the Secretary of Latin.
17th August, 1666. Dined with the Lord Chancellor, whom I entreated to visit the Hospital of the Savoy, and reduce it (after the great abuse that had been continued) to its original institution for the benefit of the poor, which he promised to do.
17th August, 1666. Had dinner with the Lord Chancellor, whom I urged to visit the Hospital of the Savoy and restore it (after the long-standing misuse it had endured) to its original purpose of helping the poor, which he promised he would do.
25th August, 1666. Waited on Sir William D'Oyly, now recovered, as it were, miraculously. In the afternoon, visited the Savoy Hospital, where I stayed to see the miserably dismembered and wounded men dressed, and gave some necessary orders. Then to my Lord Chancellor, who had, with the Bishop of London and others in the commission, chosen me one of the three surveyors of the repairs of Paul's, and to consider of a model for the new building, or, if it might be, repairing of the steeple, which was most decayed.
25th August, 1666. I met with Sir William D'Oyly, who has now miraculously recovered. In the afternoon, I visited the Savoy Hospital, where I stayed to see the severely injured men treated and gave some necessary instructions. Then I went to my Lord Chancellor, who, along with the Bishop of London and others on the commission, appointed me as one of the three surveyors for the repairs of St. Paul's. We also discussed a model for the new building, or if possible, the repair of the steeple, which is in the worst condition.
26th August, 1666. The contagion still continuing, we had the Church service at home.
26th August, 1666. Since the illness is still spreading, we held the Church service at home.
27th August, 1666. I went to St. Paul's church, where, with Dr. Wren, Mr. Pratt, Mr. May, Mr. Thomas Chicheley, Mr. Slingsby, the Bishop of London, the Dean of St. Paul's, and several expert workmen, we went about to survey the general decays of that ancient and venerable church, and to set down in writing the particulars of what was fit to be done, with the charge thereof, giving our opinion from article to article. Finding the main building to recede outward it was the opinion of Chicheley and Mr. Pratt that it had been so built ab origine for an effect in perspective, in regard of the height; but I was, with Dr. Wren, quite of another judgment, and so we entered it; we plumbed the uprights in several places. When we came to the steeple, it was deliberated whether it were not well enough to repair it only on its old foundation, with reservation to the four pillars; this Mr. Chicheley and Mr. Pratt were also for, but we totally rejected it, and persisted that it required a new foundation, not only in regard of the necessity, but for that the shape of what stood was[Pg 20] very mean, and we had a mind to build it with a noble cupola, a form of church-building not as yet known in England, but of wonderful grace. For this purpose, we offered to bring in a plan and estimate, which after much contest, was at last assented to, and that we should nominate a committee of able workmen to examine the present foundation. This concluded, we drew all up in writing, and so went with my Lord Bishop to the Dean's.
27th August, 1666. I went to St. Paul's church, where, along with Dr. Wren, Mr. Pratt, Mr. May, Mr. Thomas Chicheley, Mr. Slingsby, the Bishop of London, the Dean of St. Paul's, and several skilled workers, we set out to assess the overall deterioration of that ancient and respected church, and to document in writing what needed to be done, including the costs, sharing our opinions item by item. Noticing that the main structure leaned outward, Chicheley and Mr. Pratt suggested that it had originally been built that way for a visual effect, considering its height; however, Dr. Wren and I had a different view, so we went inside. We checked the vertical alignment in several places. When we reached the steeple, we debated whether it would be okay to repair it only on its existing foundation, keeping the four pillars as is. Mr. Chicheley and Mr. Pratt were also in favor of that, but we completely dismissed it and insisted that it needed a new foundation, not only because it was necessary but also because the current shape was quite unimpressive, and we wanted to build it with a grand cupola, a style of church architecture not yet seen in England, but remarkably elegant. For this purpose, we offered to create a plan and estimate, which after much discussion, was finally agreed upon, and we would establish a committee of skilled workers to examine the existing foundation. After concluding this, we put everything in writing and then went with my Lord Bishop to the Dean's.
28th August, 1666. Sat at the Star-chamber. Next day, to the Royal Society, where one Mercator, an excellent mathematician, produced his rare clock and new motion to perform the equations, and Mr. Rooke, his new pendulum.
28th August, 1666. Sat at the Star Chamber. The next day, at the Royal Society, a mathematician named Mercator showcased his remarkable clock and a new mechanism to perform calculations, while Mr. Rooke presented his new pendulum.
2d September, 1666. This fatal night, about ten, began the deplorable fire, near Fish street, in London.
2nd September, 1666. This tragic night, around ten o'clock, the disastrous fire started near Fish Street, in London.
3d September, 1666. I had public prayers at home. The fire continuing, after dinner, I took coach with my wife and son, and went to the Bankside in Southwark, where we beheld that dismal spectacle, the whole city in dreadful flames near the waterside; all the houses from the Bridge, all Thames street, and upward toward Cheapside, down to the Three Cranes, were now consumed; and so returned, exceedingly astonished what would become of the rest.
3rd September, 1666. I held public prayers at home. The fire was still raging, so after lunch, I took a carriage with my wife and son and went to the Bankside in Southwark, where we witnessed the horrifying sight of the entire city engulfed in terrible flames near the waterfront; all the houses from the Bridge, all of Thames Street, and upward toward Cheapside, down to the Three Cranes, were now destroyed; and we returned, extremely shocked about what would happen to the rest.
The fire having continued all this night (if I may call that night which was light as day for ten miles round about, after a dreadful manner), when conspiring with a fierce eastern wind in a very dry season, I went on foot to the same place; and saw the whole south part of the city burning from Cheapside to the Thames, and all along Cornhill (for it likewise kindled back against the wind as well as forward), Tower street, Fenchurch street, Gracious street, and so along to Baynard's Castle, and was now taking hold of St. Paul's church, to which the scaffolds contributed exceedingly. The conflagration was so universal, and the people so astonished, that, from the beginning, I know not by what despondency, or fate, they hardly stirred to quench it; so that there was nothing heard, or seen, but crying out and lamentation, running about like distracted creatures, without at all attempting to save even their goods; such a strange consternation there was upon them, so as it burned both in breadth and length, the churches, public halls, Exchange, hospitals,[Pg 21] monuments, and ornaments; leaping after a prodigious manner, from house to house, and street to street, at great distances one from the other. For the heat, with a long set of fair and warm weather, had even ignited the air, and prepared the materials to conceive the fire, which devoured, after an incredible manner, houses, furniture, and every thing. Here, we saw the Thames covered with goods floating, all the barges and boats laden with what some had time and courage to save, as, on the other side, the carts, etc., carrying out to the fields, which for many miles were strewn with movables of all sorts, and tents erecting to shelter both people and what goods they could get away. Oh, the miserable and calamitous spectacle! such as haply the world had not seen since the foundation of it, nor can be outdone till the universal conflagration thereof. All the sky was of a fiery aspect, like the top of a burning oven, and the light seen above forty miles round about for many nights. God grant mine eyes may never behold the like, who now saw above 10,000 houses all in one flame! The noise and cracking and thunder of the impetuous flames, the shrieking of women and children, the hurry of people, the fall of towers, houses, and churches, was like a hideous storm; and the air all about so hot and inflamed, that at the last one was not able to approach it, so that they were forced to stand still, and let the flames burn on, which they did, for near two miles in length and one in breadth. The clouds also of smoke were dismal, and reached, upon computation, near fifty miles in length. Thus, I left it this afternoon burning, a resemblance of Sodom, or the last day. It forcibly called to my mind that passage—"non enim hic habemus stabilem civitatem"; the ruins resembling the picture of Troy. London was, but is no more! Thus, I returned.
The fire continued all through the night (if I can call that night which was as bright as day for ten miles around, in a terrifying way). As it combined with a fierce eastern wind during a very dry season, I walked to the same spot and witnessed the entire southern part of the city burning, from Cheapside to the Thames, and all along Cornhill (it also spread backward against the wind as well as forward), Tower Street, Fenchurch Street, Gracious Street, and all the way to Baynard's Castle. It was now taking hold of St. Paul's church, aided greatly by the scaffolding. The fire was so widespread, and the people were so shocked that, from the beginning, I don’t know why, they hardly moved to put it out. All that could be heard or seen was cries and lamentations, people running around like they were in a frenzy, without attempting to save even their belongings; such was their strange panic as it burned both wide and long, including churches, public halls, the exchange, hospitals, monuments, and decorations, jumping dramatically from house to house and street to street, even at great distances. The heat, combined with a long stretch of warm weather, had ignited the air, making it easy for the fire to consume homes, furniture, and everything else. We saw the Thames filled with floating goods, all the barges and boats loaded with what a few had time and courage to save, while on the other side, carts were taking items to the fields, which for many miles were scattered with all sorts of belongings, and tents were going up to shelter those people and whatever goods they could manage to grab. Oh, what a miserable and tragic sight! One that the world likely hasn’t seen since its beginning, and won’t be outdone until the end of days. The sky was a fiery sight, like the top of a burning oven, and the light could be seen from over forty miles away for many nights. God grant that I may never see anything like it again, having witnessed over 10,000 homes all engulfed in flames! The noise, crackling, and roaring of the raging flames, the screams of women and children, the chaos of people, and the collapse of towers, houses, and churches sounded like a terrifying storm. The air around was so hot and burning that eventually, it became impossible to get close, forcing people to stand back and let the flames continue to rage, which they did for nearly two miles long and one mile wide. The clouds of smoke were dreadful, stretching nearly fifty miles long. Thus, I left it burning this afternoon, resembling Sodom or the end of the world. It strongly reminded me of the passage—"non enim hic habemus stabilem civitatem"; the ruins looked like the image of Troy. London was, but is no more! So, I returned.
4th September, 1666. The burning still rages, and it is now gotten as far as the Inner Temple. All Fleet street, the Old Bailey, Ludgate hill, Warwick lane, Newgate, Paul's chain, Watling street, now flaming, and most of it reduced to ashes; the stones of Paul's flew like grenados, the melting lead running down the streets in a stream, and the very pavements glowing with fiery redness, so as no horse, nor man, was able to tread on them, and the demolition had stopped all the passages, so that no help[Pg 22] could be applied. The eastern wind still more impetuously driving the flames forward. Nothing but the Almighty power of God was able to stop them; for vain was the help of man.
4th September, 1666. The fire is still raging, and it's reached the Inner Temple. All of Fleet Street, the Old Bailey, Ludgate Hill, Warwick Lane, Newgate, Paul's Chain, and Watling Street are now on fire, most of it reduced to ashes; the stones of St. Paul's Cathedral flew like grenades, with molten lead running down the streets in a stream, and the very pavements glowing with intense heat, making it impossible for anyone or any horse to walk on them. The destruction blocked all access points, so no help could get through. The strong eastern wind was pushing the flames even further. Only the Almighty power of God could stop them; the help of man was futile.
5th September, 1666. It crossed toward Whitehall; but oh! the confusion there was then at that Court! It pleased his Majesty to command me, among the rest, to look after the quenching of Fetter-lane end, to preserve (if possible) that part of Holborn, while the rest of the gentlemen took their several posts, some at one part, and some at another (for now they began to bestir themselves, and not till now, who hitherto had stood as men intoxicated, with their hands across), and began to consider that nothing was likely to put a stop but the blowing up of so many houses as might make a wider gap than any had yet been made by the ordinary method of pulling them down with engines. This some stout seamen proposed early enough to have saved near the whole city, but this some tenacious and avaricious men, aldermen, etc., would not permit, because their houses must have been of the first. It was, therefore, now commended to be practiced; and my concern being particularly for the Hospital of St. Bartholomew, near Smithfield, where I had many wounded and sick men, made me the more diligent to promote it; nor was my care for the Savoy less. It now pleased God, by abating the wind, and by the industry of the people, when almost all was lost infusing a new spirit into them, that the fury of it began sensibly to abate about noon, so as it came no farther than the Temple westward, nor than the entrance of Smithfield, north: but continued all this day and night so impetuous toward Cripplegate and the Tower, as made us all despair. It also broke out again in the temple; but the courage of the multitude persisting, and many houses being blown up, such gaps and desolations were soon made, as, with the former three days' consumption, the back fire did not so vehemently urge upon the rest as formerly. There was yet no standing near the burning and glowing ruins by near a furlong's space.
5th September, 1666. It moved toward Whitehall; but wow, the confusion at that Court was something else! His Majesty wanted me, along with others, to take care of the fire at Fetter-lane end, trying to protect that part of Holborn, while the rest of the guys took their positions, some in one spot and some in another (they finally started to move around, after standing there like drunk men with their arms crossed). Everyone began to realize that the only way to stop it might be to blow up enough houses to create a wider gap than had been made by the usual method of tearing them down. Some brave sailors suggested this early enough that it could have saved almost the entire city, but some stubborn and greedy people—like the aldermen—wouldn't allow it since their houses would have been among the first to go. So, it was suggested again to try it, and since I was particularly concerned about the Hospital of St. Bartholomew near Smithfield, where I had many wounded and sick men, I pushed for it even more; my concern for the Savoy was no less. Thankfully, God, by calming the wind and through the efforts of the people, almost when it seemed everything was lost, gave them a renewed spirit, and the fire began to die down around noon, stopping short of the Temple to the west and the entrance of Smithfield to the north. However, it continued furiously toward Cripplegate and the Tower, leaving us in despair. It flared up again in the Temple, but the courage of the crowd held strong, and with many houses blown up, large gaps and ruins were quickly created. With the destruction from the last three days, the backfire didn’t push as hard against the rest as it had before. Yet there was still no getting close to the burning and smoldering ruins for almost a furlong's distance.
The coal and wood wharfs, and magazines of oil, rosin, etc., did infinite mischief, so as the invective which a little before I had dedicated to his Majesty and published,5[Pg 23] giving warning what probably might be the issue of suffering those shops to be in the city was looked upon as a prophecy.
The poor inhabitants were dispersed about St. George's Fields, and Moorfields, as far as Highgate, and several miles in circle, some under tents, some under miserable huts and hovels, many without a rag, or any necessary utensils, bed or board, who from delicateness, riches, and easy accommodations in stately and well-furnished houses, were now reduced to extreme misery and poverty.
The unfortunate people were spread out across St. George's Fields and Moorfields, reaching up to Highgate and several miles around. Some lived in tents, others in poor huts and shacks, many without a shred of clothing or any basic necessities, like a bed or food. Those who once lived in comfort and luxury in grand, well-furnished homes were now facing extreme hardship and poverty.
In this calamitous condition, I returned with a sad heart to my house, blessing and adoring the distinguishing mercy of God to me and mine, who, in the midst of all this ruin, was like Lot, in my little Zoar, safe and sound.
In this disastrous situation, I went back home with a heavy heart, grateful and praising God's special mercy toward me and my family, who, in the midst of all this destruction, was like Lot in my little Zoar, safe and sound.
6th September, 1666. Thursday. I represented to his Majesty the case of the French prisoners at war in my custody, and besought him that there might be still the same care of watching at all places contiguous to unseized houses. It is not indeed imaginable how extraordinary the vigilance and activity of the King and the Duke was, even laboring in person, and being present to command, order, reward, or encourage workmen; by which he showed his affection to his people, and gained theirs. Having, then, disposed of some under cure at the Savoy, I returned to Whitehall, where I dined at Mr. Offley's, the groom-porter, who was my relation.
6th September, 1666. Thursday. I brought up to his Majesty the situation of the French prisoners of war in my care, and I asked him to ensure that there was still the same attention paid to monitoring all areas around unsurrendered houses. It’s truly remarkable how vigilant and active the King and the Duke were, even working personally and being present to lead, organize, reward, or motivate the workers; this demonstrated his care for his people and earned their loyalty. After arranging for some to be treated at the Savoy, I headed back to Whitehall, where I had lunch at Mr. Offley’s, the groom-porter, who was my relative.
7th September, 1666. I went this morning on foot from Whitehall as far as London Bridge, through the late Fleet street, Ludgate hill by St. Paul's, Cheapside, Exchange, Bishops-gate, Aldersgate, and out to Moorfields, thence through Cornhill, etc., with extraordinary difficulty, clambering over heaps of yet smoking rubbish, and frequently mistaking where I was; the ground under my feet so hot, that it even burnt the soles of my shoes. In the meantime, his Majesty got to the Tower by water, to demolish the houses about the graff, which, being built entirely about it, had they taken fire and attacked the White Tower, where the magazine of powder lay, would undoubtedly not only have beaten down and destroyed all the bridge, but sunk and torn the vessels in the river, and rendered the demolition beyond all expression for several miles about the country.
7th September, 1666. I walked this morning from Whitehall to London Bridge, going through the old Fleet Street, up Ludgate Hill by St. Paul's, Cheapside, the Exchange, Bishopsgate, Aldersgate, and out to Moorfields, then through Cornhill, etc. It was extremely difficult, climbing over piles of still-smoldering debris, and I often lost my sense of direction; the ground was so hot it even burned the soles of my shoes. Meanwhile, His Majesty reached the Tower by boat to tear down the houses around the moat, which, if they had caught fire and threatened the White Tower, where the gunpowder magazine was stored, would undoubtedly have destroyed the bridge and sunk the ships in the river, causing devastation far and wide for several miles around.
At my return, I was infinitely concerned to find that[Pg 24] goodly Church, St. Paul's—now a sad ruin, and that beautiful portico (for structure comparable to any in Europe, as not long before repaired by the late King) now rent in pieces, flakes of large stones split asunder, and nothing remaining entire but the inscription in the architrave showing by whom it was built, which had not one letter of it defaced! It was astonishing to see what immense stones the heat had in a manner calcined, so that all the ornaments, columns, friezes, capitals, and projectures of massy Portland stone, flew off, even to the very roof, where a sheet of lead covering a great space (no less than six acres by measure) was totally melted. The ruins of the vaulted roof falling, broke into St. Faith's, which being filled with the magazines of books belonging to the Stationers, and carried thither for safety, they were all consumed, burning for a week following. It is also observable that the lead over the altar at the east end was untouched, and among the divers monuments the body of one bishop remained entire. Thus lay in ashes that most venerable church, one of the most ancient pieces of early piety in the Christian world, besides near one hundred more. The lead, ironwork, bells, plate, etc., melted, the exquisitely wrought Mercers' Chapel, the sumptuous Exchange, the august fabric of Christ Church, all the rest of the Companies' Halls, splendid buildings, arches, entries, all in dust; the fountains dried up and ruined, while the very waters remained boiling; the voragos of subterranean cellars, wells, and dungeons, formerly warehouses, still burning in stench and dark clouds of smoke; so that in five or six miles traversing about I did not see one load of timber unconsumed, nor many stones but what were calcined white as snow.
When I returned, I was extremely troubled to see that [Pg 24] the grand Church of St. Paul's—now a mournful ruin—and that beautiful portico (a structure that could stand up to any in Europe, having been recently repaired by the late King) was now shattered, with large chunks of stone broken apart, and the only thing left intact was the inscription on the architrave showing who built it, which remained perfectly legible! It was astonishing to witness how the intense heat had almost turned immense stones to ash, causing all the decorative elements, columns, friezes, capitals, and projections of heavy Portland stone to fly off, even the roof, where a large sheet of lead covering a considerable area (no less than six acres) was completely melted. The fallen ruins of the vaulted roof crashed into St. Faith's, which was filled with stacks of books from the Stationers, stored there for safety, all of which were consumed, burning for a week afterward. It is also worth noting that the lead over the altar at the east end remained unscathed, and among various monuments, one bishop's body was found completely intact. Thus lay in ashes that most esteemed church, one of the oldest symbols of early faith in the Christian world, along with nearly a hundred others. The lead, ironwork, bells, silverware, and more melted; the exquisitely crafted Mercers' Chapel, the opulent Exchange, the grand structure of Christ Church, all the other Companies' Halls, magnificent buildings, arches, entrances—all turned to dust; the fountains were dried up and ruined, while the waters still boiled; the depths of underground cellars, wells, and dungeons, once warehouses, still burning with foul smells and thick clouds of smoke; so that in five or six miles of wandering around, I didn’t see one piece of timber untouched, nor many stones that weren’t calcined as white as snow.
The people, who now walked about the ruins, appeared like men in some dismal desert, or rather, in some great city laid waste by a cruel enemy; to which was added the stench that came from some poor creatures' bodies, beds, and other combustible goods. Sir Thomas Gresham's statue, though fallen from its niche in the Royal Exchange, remained entire, when all those of the Kings since the Conquest were broken to pieces. Also the standard in Cornhill, and Queen Elizabeth's effigies, with some arms on Ludgate, continued with but little detriment, while the vast iron chains of the city streets, hinges, bars, and gates[Pg 25] of prisons, were many of them melted and reduced to cinders by the vehement heat. Nor was I yet able to pass through any of the narrow streets, but kept the widest; the ground and air, smoke and fiery vapor, continued so intense, that my hair was almost singed, and my feet insufferably surbated. The by-lanes and narrow streets were quite filled up with rubbish; nor could one have possibly known where he was, but by the ruins of some Church, or Hall, that had some remarkable tower, or pinnacle remaining.
The people now wandering among the ruins looked like survivors in a bleak desert or a once-great city destroyed by a ruthless enemy; adding to this was the awful smell coming from some poor creatures' bodies, bedding, and other flammable items. Sir Thomas Gresham's statue, although it had fallen from its spot in the Royal Exchange, remained intact, while all the statues of the Kings since the Conquest were shattered. The standard in Cornhill and Queen Elizabeth's likeness, along with some arms on Ludgate, survived with only minor damage, while the city's massive iron chains, hinges, bars, and gates of prisons were mostly melted down to ashes from the extreme heat. I still couldn't manage to get through any of the narrow streets, so I stuck to the wider ones; the ground and air, filled with smoke and burning vapor, were so intense that my hair was nearly singed, and my feet felt unbearably hot. The alleys and narrow streets were completely clogged with debris; there was no way to tell where one was except by the ruins of a Church or Hall that had some distinctive tower or spire left standing.
I then went towards Islington and Highgate, where one might have seen 200,000 people of all ranks and degrees dispersed, and lying along by their heaps of what they could save from the fire, deploring their loss; and, though ready to perish for hunger and destitution, yet not asking one penny for relief, which to me appeared a stranger sight than any I had yet beheld. His Majesty and Council indeed took all imaginable care for their relief, by proclamation for the country to come in, and refresh them with provisions.
I then went toward Islington and Highgate, where you could see 200,000 people from all walks of life scattered around, lying next to piles of what they could save from the fire, mourning their loss. Even though they were on the verge of starving and were in dire need, they weren’t asking for a single penny for help, which seemed stranger to me than anything I had seen before. His Majesty and the Council really did everything they could to help them, issuing a proclamation asking the country to come together and provide them with food.
In the midst of all this calamity and confusion, there was, I know not how, an alarm begun that the French and Dutch, with whom we were now in hostility, were not only landed, but even entering the city. There was, in truth, some days before, great suspicion of those two nations joining; and now that they had been the occasion of firing the town. This report did so terrify, that on a sudden there was such an uproar and tumult that they ran from their goods, and, taking what weapons they could come at, they could not be stopped from falling on some of those nations whom they casually met, without sense or reason. The clamor and peril grew so excessive, that it made the whole Court amazed, and they did with infinite pains and great difficulty, reduce and appease the people, sending troops of soldiers and guards, to cause them to retire into the fields again, where they were watched all this night. I left them pretty quiet, and came home sufficiently weary and broken. Their spirits thus a little calmed, and the affright abated, they now began to repair into the suburbs about the city, where such as had friends, or opportunity, got shelter for the present to which his Majesty's proclamation also invited them.[Pg 26]
In the middle of all this chaos and confusion, there was, for some reason, an alarm that the French and Dutch, with whom we were now at war, were not only on land but actually entering the city. Just a few days earlier, there had been serious concerns about those two nations teaming up, and now they were responsible for burning the town. This news was so terrifying that suddenly there was such an uproar and chaos that people abandoned their belongings, grabbed whatever weapons they could find, and recklessly attacked anyone from those nations they happened to encounter, without any sense or logic. The noise and danger escalated to such an extent that it left the whole Court in shock, and they had to work incredibly hard and with great difficulty to calm the people down. They sent in groups of soldiers and guards to force them to move back into the fields, where they were kept under watch all night. I left them somewhat settled and returned home completely exhausted and worn out. With their spirits a bit soothed and the fear lessened, they started to head into the suburbs around the city, where those who had friends or a safe place found shelter for the time being, which was also encouraged by the King’s proclamation.[Pg 26]
Still, the plague continuing in our parish, I could not, without danger, adventure to our church.
Still, with the plague still affecting our parish, I couldn't risk going to our church without danger.
10th September, 1666. I went again to the ruins; for it was now no longer a city.
10th September, 1666. I went back to the ruins; because it was no longer a city.
13th September, 1666. I presented his Majesty with a survey of the ruins, and a plot for a new city, with a discourse on it; whereupon, after dinner, his Majesty sent for me into the Queen's bed-chamber, her Majesty and the Duke only being present. They examined each particular, and discoursed on them for near an hour, seeming to be extremely pleased with what I had so early thought on. The Queen was now in her cavalier riding-habit, hat and feather, and horseman's coat, going to take the air.
13th September, 1666. I presented His Majesty with a survey of the ruins and a plan for a new city, along with a discussion about it; after dinner, His Majesty summoned me to the Queen's bedroom, where only Her Majesty and the Duke were present. They went through each detail and discussed them for almost an hour, appearing very pleased with my early ideas. The Queen was dressed in her riding outfit, including a hat with a feather and a horseman's coat, preparing to go out for some fresh air.
27th September, 1666. Dined at Sir William D'Oyly's, with that worthy gentleman, Sir John Holland, of Suffolk.
27th September, 1666. Had dinner at Sir William D'Oyly's, with the esteemed Sir John Holland from Suffolk.
10th October, 1666. This day was ordered a general Fast through the Nation, to humble us on the late dreadful conflagration, added to the plague and war, the most dismal judgments that could be inflicted; but which indeed we highly deserved for our prodigious ingratitude, burning lusts, dissolute court, profane and abominable lives, under such dispensations of God's continued favor in restoring Church, Prince, and People from our late intestine calamities, of which we were altogether unmindful, even to astonishment. This made me resolve to go to our parish assembly, where our Doctor preached on Luke xix. 41: piously applying it to the occasion. After which, was a collection for the distressed losers in the late fire.
10th October, 1666. Today, a nationwide Fast was declared to humble us in light of the recent terrible fire, along with the plague and war—some of the most dreadful punishments we could face. But truthfully, we totally deserved it for our immense ingratitude, burning desires, reckless behavior at court, and sinful, disgraceful lives, all while ignoring the ongoing blessings from God in restoring our Church, Prince, and People from our past troubles, which we barely acknowledged, to our astonishment. This prompted me to attend our parish gathering, where our Doctor preached on Luke xix. 41: thoughtfully relating it to the occasion. Afterwards, there was a collection for those who suffered losses in the recent fire.
18th October, 1666. To Court. It being the first time his Majesty put himself solemnly into the Eastern fashion of vest, changing doublet, stiff collar, bands and cloak, into a comely dress, after the Persian mode, with girdles or straps, and shoestrings and garters into buckles, of which some were set with precious stones6 resolving[Pg 27] never to alter it, and to leave the French mode, which had hitherto obtained to our great expense and reproach. Upon which, divers courtiers and gentlemen gave his Majesty gold by way of wager that he would not persist in this resolution. I had sometime before presented an invective against that unconstancy, and our so much affecting the French fashion, to his Majesty; in which I took occasion to describe the comeliness and usefulness of the Persian clothing, in the very same manner his Majesty now clad himself. This pamphlet I entitled "Tyrannus, or the Mode," and gave it to the King to read. I do not impute to this discourse the change which soon happened, but it was an identity that I could not but take notice of.
18th October, 1666. To Court. It was the first time his Majesty formally wore the Eastern-style outfit, swapping his doublet, stiff collar, bands, and cloak for a nice Persian-style outfit with belts, straps, shoestrings, and garters converted to buckles, some adorned with precious stones6 resolving[Pg 27] never to change it and to abandon the French style, which had previously cost us dearly and brought us shame. Because of this, several courtiers and gentlemen wagered gold that his Majesty wouldn't stick to this decision. Earlier, I had presented a critique of that inconsistency and our excessive fondness for French fashion to his Majesty; in it, I described how attractive and practical Persian clothing was, just like how his Majesty now dressed. I titled this pamphlet "Tyrannus, or the Mode" and gave it to the King to read. I don't think this discussion caused the change that soon followed, but it was a resemblance I couldn't help but notice.
This night was acted my Lord Broghill's tragedy, called "Mustapha," before their Majesties at Court, at which I was present; very seldom going to the public theatres for many reasons now, as they were abused to an atheistical liberty; foul and indecent women now (and never till now) permitted to appear and act, who inflaming several young noblemen and gallants, became their misses, and to some, their wives. Witness the Earl of Oxford, Sir R. Howard, Prince Rupert, the Earl of Dorset, and another greater person than any of them, who fell into their snares, to the reproach of their noble families, and ruin of both body and soul.7 I was invited by my Lord Chamberlain to see this tragedy, exceedingly well written, though in my mind I did not approve of any such pastime in a time of such judgments and calamities.
This night, Lord Broghill's play, titled "Mustapha," was performed before their Majesties at Court, which I attended. I rarely go to public theaters these days for many reasons; they have turned into places of godless freedom, allowing indecent women—who never appeared before now—to perform, leading many young noblemen and gentlemen astray, making them their lovers, and for some, their wives. Just look at the Earl of Oxford, Sir R. Howard, Prince Rupert, the Earl of Dorset, and even a more eminent person than any of them, who fell into their traps, bringing shame to their noble families and the ruin of both body and soul.7 I was invited by my Lord Chamberlain to see this play, which was extremely well written, although I personally did not think such entertainment was appropriate during a time of severe judgments and disasters.
21st October, 1666. This season, after so long and extraordinary a drought in August and September, as if preparatory for the dreadful fire, was so very wet and rainy as many feared an ensuing famine.
21st October, 1666. This season, after such a long and unusual drought in August and September, almost like a warning for the terrible fire to come, has been extremely wet and rainy, leading many to worry about a potential famine.
28th October, 1666. The pestilence, through God's mercy, began now to abate considerably in our town.
28th October, 1666. Thanks to God's mercy, the plague started to decrease significantly in our town.
30th October, 1666. To London to our office, and now had I on the vest and surcoat, or tunic, as it was called,[Pg 28] after his Majesty had brought the whole court to it. It was a comely and manly habit, too good to hold, it being impossible for us in good earnest to leave the Monsieurs' vanities long.
30th October, 1666. Went to our office in London, and I was wearing the vest and surcoat, or tunic, as it was called,[Pg 28] which his Majesty had popularized among the entire court. It was a stylish and masculine outfit, too good to hold onto, as it was hard for us to genuinely resist the latest trends from the French.
31st October, 1666. I heard the signal cause of my Lord Cleveland pleaded before the House of Lords; and was this day forty-six years of age, wonderfully protected by the mercies of God, for which I render him immortal thanks.
31st October, 1666. I heard the important case of my Lord Cleveland presented before the House of Lords; and today I turned forty-six years old, wonderfully protected by God's mercy, for which I offer him eternal thanks.
14th November, 1666. I went my winter circle through my district, Rochester and other places, where I had men quartered, and in custody.
14th November, 1666. I made my winter rounds through my district, including Rochester and other places, where I had personnel stationed and in custody.
15th November, 1666. To Leeds Castle.
15th November, 1666. To Leeds Castle.
16th November, 1666. I mustered the prisoners, being about 600 Dutch and French, ordered their proportion of bread to be augmented and provided clothes and fuel. Monsieur Colbert, Ambassador at the Court of England, this day sent money from his master, the French King, to every prisoner of that nation under my guard.
16th November, 1666. I gathered the prisoners, which were around 600 Dutch and French, instructed that their share of bread be increased, and provided them with clothes and fuel. Monsieur Colbert, the Ambassador at the Court of England, sent money from his master, the French King, to every prisoner of that nationality under my supervision today.
17th November, 1666. I returned to Chatham, my chariot overturning on the steep of Bexley Hill, wounded me in two places on the head; my son, Jack, being with me, was like to have been worse cut by the glass; but I thank God we both escaped without much hurt, though not without exceeding danger.
17th November, 1666. I came back to Chatham, and my carriage flipped over on the steep part of Bexley Hill, injuring me in two spots on my head; my son, Jack, who was with me, nearly got hurt worse by the glass; but I thank God we both came away with only minor injuries, even though it was very risky.
18th November, 1666. At Rochester.
November 18, 1666. At Rochester.
19th November, 1666. Returned home.
November 19, 1666. Came back home.
23d November, 1666. At London, I heard an extraordinary case before a Committee of the whole House of Commons, in the Commons' House of Parliament, between one Captain Taylor and my Lord Viscount Mordaunt, where, after the lawyers had pleaded and the witnesses been examined, such foul and dishonorable things were produced against his Lordship, of tyranny during his government of Windsor Castle, of which he was Constable, incontinence, and suborning witnesses (of which last, one Sir Richard Breames was most concerned), that I was exceedingly interested for his Lordship, who was my special friend, and husband of the most virtuous lady in the world. We sat till near ten at night, and yet but half the counsel had done on behalf of the plaintiff. The question then was put for bringing in of lights to sit longer. This lasted so long before it was determined, and raised such a con[Pg 29]fused noise among the members, that a stranger would have been astonished at it. I admire that there is not a rationale to regulate such trifling accidents, which consume much time, and is a reproach to the gravity of so great an assembly of sober men.
23rd November, 1666. In London, I witnessed a remarkable case before the Committee of the whole House of Commons in the House of Commons at Parliament, involving Captain Taylor and Lord Viscount Mordaunt. After the lawyers presented their arguments and the witnesses were examined, some disgusting and dishonorable things were brought against his Lordship, including claims of tyranny during his time as Constable of Windsor Castle, infidelity, and bribing witnesses (with one Sir Richard Breames being particularly involved). I was very concerned for his Lordship, who was a close friend of mine and married to the most virtuous lady in the world. We sat until nearly ten at night, and yet only half the attorneys had spoken on behalf of the plaintiff. The question was raised about bringing in lights to continue sitting longer. This took a long time to resolve and caused such a noisy commotion among the members that an outsider would have been astonished. I find it hard to believe there isn't a system in place to manage such trivial matters, which waste a lot of time and reflect poorly on the seriousness of such a significant assembly of respectable individuals.
27th November, 1666. Sir Hugh Pollard, Comptroller of the Household, died at Whitehall, and his Majesty conferred the white staff on my brother Commissioner for sick and wounded, Sir Thomas Clifford, a bold young gentleman, of a small fortune in Devon, but advanced by Lord Arlington, Secretary of State, to the great astonishment of all the Court. This gentleman was somewhat related to me by the marriage of his mother to my nearest kinsman, Gregory Coale, and was ever my noble friend, a valiant and daring person, but by no means fit for a supple and flattering courtier.
27th November, 1666. Sir Hugh Pollard, the Comptroller of the Household, passed away at Whitehall, and the King appointed my brother Commissioner for sick and wounded, Sir Thomas Clifford, a bold young man with a modest fortune in Devon, but who was promoted by Lord Arlington, the Secretary of State, much to everyone's surprise at Court. This gentleman was somewhat related to me through his mother's marriage to my closest relative, Gregory Coale, and he was always my noble friend, a brave and daring person, but definitely not suited for a smooth-talking, flattering courtier.
28th November, 1666. Went to see Clarendon House, now almost finished, a goodly pile to see, but had many defects as to the architecture, yet placed most gracefully. After this, I waited on the Lord Chancellor, who was now at Berkshire House, since the burning of London.
28th November, 1666. I went to check out Clarendon House, which is nearly complete. It's an impressive structure to look at, but it has several architectural flaws. Still, it’s situated quite nicely. After that, I visited the Lord Chancellor, who was currently at Berkshire House following the Great Fire of London.
2d December, 1666. Dined with me Monsieur Kiviet, a Dutch gentleman-pensioner of Rotterdam, who came over for protection, being of the Prince of Orange's party, now not welcome in Holland. The King knighted him for some merit in the Prince's behalf. He should, if caught, have been beheaded with Monsieur Buat, and was brother-in-law to Van Tromp, the sea-general. With him came Mr. Gabriel Sylvius, and Mr. Williamson, secretary to Lord Arlington; M. Kiviet came to examine whether the soil about the river of Thames would be proper to make clinker bricks, and to treat with me about some accommodation in order to it.
2nd December, 1666. I had lunch with Monsieur Kiviet, a Dutch gentleman-pensioner from Rotterdam, who came here for safety since he’s aligned with the Prince of Orange and isn’t welcome in Holland right now. The King honored him with a knighthood for some contributions on the Prince's behalf. If he had been caught, he would have faced beheading alongside Monsieur Buat, and he was the brother-in-law of Van Tromp, the naval general. Also with him were Mr. Gabriel Sylvius and Mr. Williamson, secretary to Lord Arlington. M. Kiviet came to see if the soil around the River Thames would be suitable for making clinker bricks and to discuss some arrangements related to that.
9th January, 1666-67. To the Royal Society, which since the sad conflagration were invited by Mr. Howard to sit at Arundel-House in the Strand, who at my instigation likewise bestowed on the Society that noble library which his grandfather especially, and his ancestors had collected. This gentleman had so little inclination to books, that it was the preservation of them from embezzlement.
9th January, 1666-67. To the Royal Society, which, since the unfortunate fire, was invited by Mr. Howard to meet at Arundel House in the Strand. At my suggestion, he also provided the Society with that impressive library that his grandfather in particular, along with his ancestors, had gathered. This gentleman had so little interest in books that it was more about protecting them from being misappropriated.
24th January, 1667. Visited my Lord Clarendon, and presented my son, John, to him, now preparing to go to Oxford, of which his Lordship was Chancellor. This even[Pg 30]ing I heard rare Italian voices, two eunuchs and one woman, in his Majesty's green chamber, next his cabinet.
24th January, 1667. I visited Lord Clarendon and introduced my son, John, who is getting ready to go to Oxford, where his Lordship is Chancellor. This evening, I heard some amazing Italian voices, two eunuchs and one woman, in His Majesty's green chamber, next to his cabinet.
29th January, 1667. To London, in order to my son's Oxford journey, who, being very early entered both in Latin and Greek, and prompt to learn beyond most of his age, I was persuaded to trust him under the tutorage of Mr. Bohun, Fellow of New College, who had been his preceptor in my house some years before; but, at Oxford, under the inspection of Dr. Bathurst, President of Trinity College, where I placed him, not as yet thirteen years old. He was newly out of long coats.8
29th January, 1667. I went to London to prepare for my son's journey to Oxford. He had started studying Latin and Greek at a very young age and was eager to learn more than most kids his age. I decided to trust him to Mr. Bohun, a Fellow of New College, who had been his tutor at our home a few years earlier. However, at Oxford, he would be under the guidance of Dr. Bathurst, the President of Trinity College, where I enrolled him, even though he was not yet thirteen years old. He had just outgrown his long coats.8
15th February, 1667. My little book, in answer to Sir George Mackenzie on Solitude, was now published, entitled "Public Employment, and an active Life with its Appanages, preferred to Solitude."9
15th February, 1667. My small book, responding to Sir George Mackenzie on Solitude, has now been published, titled "Public Employment, and an Active Life with its Perks, Preferred to Solitude."9
18th February, 1667. I was present at a magnificent ball, or masque, in the theatre at the Court, where their Majesties and all the great lords and ladies danced, infinitely gallant, the men in their richly embroidered, most becoming vests.
18th February, 1667. I attended a spectacular ball, or masquerade, at the theater in the Court, where the royal family and all the noble lords and ladies danced, incredibly stylish, the men in their beautifully embroidered, flattering vests.
19th February, 1667. I saw a comedy acted at Court. In the afternoon, I witnessed a wrestling match for £1,000 in St. James's Park, before his Majesty, a vast assemblage of lords and other spectators, between the western and northern men, Mr. Secretary Morice and Lord Gerard being the judges. The western men won. Many great sums were betted.
19th February, 1667. I saw a comedy performed at Court. In the afternoon, I watched a wrestling match for £1,000 in St. James's Park, in front of his Majesty, with a huge crowd of lords and other spectators, judged by Mr. Secretary Morice and Lord Gerard. The western team won. There were many big bets placed.
6th March, 1667. I proposed to my Lord Chancellor, Monsieur Kiviet's undertaking to wharf the whole river of Thames, or quay, from the Temple to the Tower, as far as the fire destroyed, with brick, without piles, both lasting and ornamental.—Great frosts, snow and winds, prodigious[Pg 31] at the vernal equinox; indeed it had been a year of prodigies in this nation, plague, war, fire, rain, tempest and comet.
6th March, 1667. I suggested to my Lord Chancellor, Monsieur Kiviet's plan to pave the entire Thames riverfront, or quay, from the Temple to the Tower, as far as the fire destroyed, using bricks, without piles, both durable and decorative. — There were severe frosts, snow, and strong winds during the spring equinox; in fact, it had been a year of wonders in this nation: plague, war, fire, rain, storms, and a comet.[Pg 31]
14th March, 1667. Saw "The Virgin Queen,"10 a play written by Mr. Dryden.
14th March, 1667. Saw "The Virgin Queen,"10 a play written by Mr. Dryden.
22d March, 1667. Dined at Mr. Secretary Morice's, who showed me his library, which was a well chosen collection. This afternoon, I had audience of his Majesty, concerning the proposal I had made of building the quay.
22d March, 1667. Had dinner at Mr. Secretary Morice's, who showed me his library, which was a well-chosen collection. This afternoon, I met with his Majesty regarding the proposal I had made about building the quay.
26th March, 1667. Sir John Kiviet dined with me. We went to search for brick-earth, in order to a great undertaking.
26th March, 1667. Sir John Kiviet had dinner with me. We went to look for clay suitable for bricks, for a major project.
4th April, 1667. The cold so intense, that there was hardly a leaf on a tree.
4th April, 1667. The cold was so intense that there was barely a leaf on any tree.
18th April, 1667. I went to make court to the Duke and Duchess of Newcastle, at their house in Clerkenwell, being newly come out of the north. They received me with great kindness, and I was much pleased with the extraordinary fanciful habit, garb, and discourse of the Duchess.
18th April, 1667. I went to visit the Duke and Duchess of Newcastle at their home in Clerkenwell, having just returned from the north. They welcomed me warmly, and I was really impressed by the Duchess's unique style, clothing, and conversation.
22d April, 1667. Saw the sumptuous supper in the banqueting-house at Whitehall, on the eve of St. George's day, where were all the companions of the Order of the Garter.
22nd April, 1667. Witnessed the lavish dinner in the banquet hall at Whitehall, on the eve of St. George's day, attended by all the members of the Order of the Garter.
23d April, 1667. In the morning, his Majesty went to chapel with the Knights of the Garter, all in their habits and robes, ushered by the heralds; after the first service, they went in procession, the youngest first, the Sovereign last, with the Prelate of the Order and Dean, who had about his neck the book of the Statutes of the Order; and then the Chancellor of the Order (old Sir Henry de Vic), who wore the purse about his neck; then the Heralds and Garter King-at-Arms, Clarencieux, Black Rod. But before the Prelate and Dean of Windsor went the gentlemen of the chapel and choristers, singing as they marched; behind them two doctors of music in damask robes; this procession was about the courts at Whitehall. Then, returning to their stalls and seats in the chapel, placed under each knight's coat-armor and titles, the second[Pg 32] service began. Then, the King offered at the altar, an anthem was sung; then, the rest of the Knights offered, and lastly proceeded to the banqueting-house to a great feast. The King sat on an elevated throne at the upper end at a table alone; the Knights at a table on the right hand, reaching all the length of the room; over against them a cupboard of rich gilded plate; at the lower end, the music; on the balusters above, wind music, trumpets, and kettle-drums. The King was served by the lords and pensioners who brought up the dishes. About the middle of the dinner, the Knights drank the King's health, then the King, theirs, when the trumpets and music played and sounded, the guns going off at the Tower. At the Banquet, came in the Queen, and stood by the King's left hand, but did not sit. Then was the banqueting-stuff flung about the room profusely. In truth, the crowd was so great, that though I stayed all the supper the day before, I now stayed no longer than this sport began, for fear of disorder. The cheer was extraordinary, each Knight having forty dishes to his mess, piled up five or six high; the room hung with the richest tapestry.
23rd April, 1667. In the morning, His Majesty went to chapel with the Knights of the Garter, all dressed in their habits and robes, escorted by the heralds. After the first service, they formed a procession, starting with the youngest and ending with the Sovereign, along with the Prelate of the Order and Dean, who carried the book of the Statutes of the Order around his neck. Then came the Chancellor of the Order, old Sir Henry de Vic, who wore the purse around his neck; followed by the Heralds and Garter King-at-Arms, Clarencieux, and Black Rod. The gentlemen of the chapel and choristers marched ahead of the Prelate and Dean of Windsor, singing as they went; behind them were two doctors of music in damask robes. This procession took place around the courts at Whitehall. After returning to their stalls and seats in the chapel, positioned under each knight's coat-of-arms and titles, the second service began. Then, the King made an offering at the altar, an anthem was sung; the other Knights followed with their offerings and then headed to the banqueting house for a grand feast. The King sat alone on an elevated throne at the head of the table; the Knights were seated at a table on his right, stretching the length of the room; opposite them was a display of rich gilded plate; at the lower end was the music; above on the balusters, there were wind instruments, trumpets, and kettle drums. The lords and pensioners served the King, bringing up the dishes. About halfway through dinner, the Knights toasted to the King's health, and then the King toasted to theirs, accompanied by music and the sound of cannons firing at the Tower. During the banquet, the Queen entered and stood by the King's left side but did not sit down. Then, the banquet items were thrown around the room generously. In fact, the crowd was so large that although I stayed for the supper the night before, I didn't linger long once this celebration began, fearing it would get chaotic. The feast was tremendous, with each Knight receiving forty dishes piled five or six high; the room was decorated with the richest tapestries.
25th April, 1667. Visited again the Duke of Newcastle, with whom I had been acquainted long before in France, where the Duchess had obligation to my wife's mother for her marriage there; she was sister to Lord Lucas, and maid of honor then to the Queen-Mother; married in our chapel at Paris. My wife being with me, the Duke and Duchess both would needs bring her to the very Court.
25th April, 1667. I visited the Duke of Newcastle again, with whom I had known for a long time in France, where the Duchess was indebted to my wife's mother for her marriage there; she was the sister of Lord Lucas and was a maid of honor to the Queen-Mother at that time; they married in our chapel in Paris. My wife was with me, and both the Duke and Duchess insisted on taking her to the very Court.
26th April, 1667. My Lord Chancellor showed me all his newly finished and furnished palace and library; then, we went to take the air in Hyde-Park.
26th April, 1667. My Lord Chancellor showed me his brand new, fully furnished palace and library; then, we went for a stroll in Hyde Park.
27th April, 1667. I had a great deal of discourse with his Majesty at dinner. In the afternoon, I went again with my wife to the Duchess of Newcastle, who received her in a kind of transport, suitable to her extravagant humor and dress, which was very singular.
27th April, 1667. I had an extensive conversation with his Majesty at dinner. In the afternoon, I went once more with my wife to the Duchess of Newcastle, who welcomed her with an enthusiasm that matched her eccentric personality and unique outfit.
8th May, 1667. Made up accounts with our Receiver, which amounted to £33,936 1s. 4d. Dined at Lord Cornbury's, with Don Francisco de Melos, Portugal Ambassador, and kindred to the Queen: Of the party were Mr. Henry Jermyn and Sir Henry Capel. Afterward I went to Arundel House, to salute Mr. Howard's sons, newly returned out of France.[Pg 33]
8th May, 1667. Settled accounts with our Receiver, which totaled £33,936 1s. 4d. Had lunch at Lord Cornbury's with Don Francisco de Melos, the Portuguese Ambassador, who is related to the Queen. Also present were Mr. Henry Jermyn and Sir Henry Capel. Afterward, I went to Arundel House to greet Mr. Howard's sons, who had just returned from France.[Pg 33]
11th May, 1667. To London; dined with the Duke of Newcastle, and sat discoursing with her Grace in her bedchamber after dinner, till my Lord Marquis of Dorchester, with other company came in, when I went away.
11th May, 1667. To London; I had lunch with the Duke of Newcastle and chatted with her Grace in her bedroom after lunch, until the Lord Marquis of Dorchester and other guests arrived, at which point I left.
30th May, 1667. To London, to wait on the Duchess of Newcastle (who was a mighty pretender to learning, poetry, and philosophy, and had in both published divers books) to the Royal Society, whither she came in great pomp, and being received by our Lord President at the door of our meeting-room, the mace, etc., carried before him, had several experiments shown to her. I conducted her Grace to her coach, and returned home.
30th May, 1667. I went to London to meet the Duchess of Newcastle, who was quite the wannabe intellectual, poet, and philosopher, and had published several books on both subjects. She arrived at the Royal Society with much fanfare, and our Lord President welcomed her at the entrance to our meeting room, with the mace and other items carried in front of him. She was shown several experiments. I escorted her Grace to her carriage and then went home.
1st June, 1667. I went to Greenwich, where his Majesty was trying divers grenadoes shot out of cannon at the Castlehill, from the house in the park; they broke not till they hit the mark, the forged ones broke not at all, but the cast ones very well. The inventor was a German there present. At the same time, a ring was shown to the King, pretended to be a projection of mercury, and malleable, and said by the gentlemen to be fixed by the juice of a plant.
1st June, 1667. I went to Greenwich, where the King was testing various grenades fired from cannons at Castlehill, from the house in the park; they didn’t explode until they hit their target, while the forged ones didn’t explode at all, but the cast ones worked perfectly. The inventor was a German who was there. At the same time, a ring was presented to the King, claimed to be made of mercury, and flexible, and the gentlemen said it was set using the sap of a plant.
8th June, 1667. To London, alarmed by the Dutch, who were fallen on our fleet at Chatham, by a most audacious enterprise, entering the very river with part of their fleet, doing us not only disgrace, but incredible mischief in burning several of our best men-of-war lying at anchor and moored there, and all this through our unaccountable negligence in not setting out our fleet in due time. This alarm caused me, fearing the enemy might venture up the Thames even to London (which they might have done with ease, and fired all the vessels in the river, too), to send away my best goods, plate, etc., from my house to another place. The alarm was so great that it put both country and city into fear, panic, and consternation, such as I hope I shall never see more; everybody was flying, none knew why or whither. Now, there were land forces dispatched with the Duke of Albemarle, Lord Middleton, Prince Rupert, and the Duke, to hinder the Dutch coming to Chatham, fortifying Upnor Castle, and laying chains and bombs; but the resolute enemy broke through all, and set fire on our ships, and retreated in spite, stopping up the Thames, the rest of the fleet lying before the mouth of it.[Pg 34]
8th June, 1667. I went to London, worried about the Dutch, who had attacked our fleet at Chatham with a bold move, bringing part of their fleet right into the river. They caused us not just humiliation but also serious damage by burning several of our best warships that were anchored and moored there—all because we neglected to send our fleet out in time. This situation made me fear that the enemy might try to come up the Thames all the way to London (which they could have done easily and set fire to all the ships in the river). So, I sent my valuable items, like silver and other possessions, from my house to a safer location. The panic was so intense that it spread fear and chaos throughout both the city and the countryside, something I hope never to witness again; people were running without knowing why or where to. Meanwhile, ground forces were sent out with the Duke of Albemarle, Lord Middleton, Prince Rupert, and the Duke to stop the Dutch from reaching Chatham by fortifying Upnor Castle and setting up chains and bombs. However, the determined enemy broke through everything, set our ships on fire, and retreated defiantly, blocking the Thames while the rest of their fleet waited at its mouth.[Pg 34]
14th June, 1667. I went to see the work at Woolwich, a battery to prevent them coming up to London, which Prince Rupert commanded, and sunk some ships in the river.
14th June, 1667. I went to check out the work at Woolwich, a battery designed to stop them from reaching London, which Prince Rupert was in charge of, and sank some ships in the river.
17th June, 1667. This night, about two o'clock, some chips and combustible matter prepared for some fire-ships, taking flame in Deptford-yard, made such a blaze, and caused such an uproar in the Tower (it being given out that the Dutch fleet was come up, and had landed their men and fired the Tower), as had liked to have done more mischief before people would be persuaded to the contrary and believe the accident. Everybody went to their arms. These were sad and troublesome times.
17th June, 1667. Tonight, around two o'clock, some wood and flammable materials set aside for fire-ships caught fire in Deptford-yard, creating a huge blaze and causing a panic in the Tower (since it was rumored that the Dutch fleet had arrived, landed their troops, and attacked the Tower), which could have caused more chaos before people were convinced otherwise and accepted it was just an accident. Everyone grabbed their weapons. These were difficult and distressing times.
24th June, 1667. The Dutch fleet still continuing to stop up the river, so as nothing could stir out or come in, I was before the Council, and commanded by his Majesty to go with some others and search about the environs of the city, now exceedingly distressed for want of fuel, whether there could be any peat, or turf, found fit for use. The next day, I went and discovered enough, and made my report that there might be found a great deal; but nothing further was done in it.
24th June, 1667. The Dutch fleet was still blocking the river, preventing anything from entering or leaving. I was called before the Council and ordered by His Majesty to go with a few others to search the area around the city, which was in desperate need of fuel, to see if we could find any suitable peat or turf. The next day, I went out and found plenty of it and reported that there was a lot available; however, nothing else was done about it.
28th June, 1667. I went to Chatham, and thence to view not only what mischief the Dutch had done; but how triumphantly their whole fleet lay within the very mouth of the Thames, all from the North Foreland, Margate, even to the buoy of the Nore—a dreadful spectacle as ever Englishmen saw, and a dishonor never to be wiped off! Those who advised his Majesty to prepare no fleet this spring deserved—I know what—but11—
28th June, 1667. I went to Chatham, and from there I went to see not just what damage the Dutch had caused, but also how proudly their entire fleet was positioned right at the mouth of the Thames, from North Foreland, Margate, all the way to the Nore buoy—a terrifying sight that Englishmen had ever seen, and a disgrace that can never be erased! Those who advised his Majesty not to prepare a fleet this spring deserve—I know what—but11—
Here in the river off Chatham, just before the town, lay the carcase of the "London" (now the third time burnt), the "Royal Oak," the "James," etc., yet smoking; and now, when the mischief was done, we were making trifling forts on the brink of the river. Here were yet forces, both of horse and foot, with General Middleton continually expecting the motions of the enemy's fleet. I had much[Pg 35] discourse with him, who was an experienced commander, I told him I wondered the King did not fortify Sheerness12 and the Ferry; both abandoned.
Here in the river off Chatham, just before the town, lay the wreckage of the "London" (now burned for the third time), the "Royal Oak," the "James," etc., still smoking; and now, after the damage was done, we were building small forts on the edge of the river. There were still forces, both cavalry and infantry, with General Middleton constantly watching for the movements of the enemy's fleet. I had a lengthy conversation with him, as he was an experienced commander. I told him I was surprised the King hadn’t fortified Sheerness and the Ferry, both of which were abandoned.
2d July, 1667. Called upon my Lord Arlington, as from his Majesty, about the new fuel. The occasion why I was mentioned, was from what I said in my Sylva three years before, about a sort of fuel for a need, which obstructed a patent of Lord Carlingford, who had been seeking for it himself; he was endeavoring to bring me into the project, and proffered me a share. I met my Lord; and, on the 9th, by an order of Council, went to my Lord Mayor, to be assisting. In the meantime they had made an experiment of my receipt of houllies, which I mention in my book to be made at Maestricht, with a mixture of charcoal dust and loam, and which was tried with success at Gresham College (then being the exchange for the meeting of the merchants since the fire) for everybody to see. This done, I went to the Treasury for £12,000 for the sick and wounded yet on my hands.
2nd July, 1667. I visited my Lord Arlington on behalf of his Majesty regarding the new fuel. I was mentioned because of something I wrote in my Sylva three years ago about a type of fuel needed for a particular purpose, which had obstructed a patent held by Lord Carlingford, who had been looking for it himself. He was trying to involve me in the project and offered me a share. I met with my Lord, and on the 9th, following an order from the Council, I went to the Lord Mayor to assist. In the meantime, they had conducted an experiment based on my recipe for houllies, which I mentioned in my book, made at Maestricht, mixing charcoal dust with loam, and which was successfully tested at Gresham College (then serving as the meeting place for merchants since the fire) for everyone to see. After that, I went to the Treasury to request £12,000 for the sick and wounded still under my care.
Next day, we met again about the fuel at Sir J. Armourer's in the Mews.
Next day, we met again about the fuel at Sir J. Armourer's in the Mews.
8th July, 1667. My Lord Brereton and others dined at my house, where I showed them proof of my new fuel, which was very glowing, and without smoke or ill smell.
8th July, 1667. My Lord Brereton and others had dinner at my house, where I showed them evidence of my new fuel, which burned brightly and produced no smoke or bad odor.
10th July, 1667. I went to see Sir Samuel Morland's inventions and machines, arithmetical wheels, quench-fires, and new harp.
10th July, 1667. I went to check out Sir Samuel Morland's inventions and machines, arithmetic wheels, quench-fires, and a new harp.
17th July, 1667. The master of the mint and his lady, Mr. Williamson, Sir Nicholas Armourer, Sir Edward Bowyer, Sir Anthony Auger, and other friends dined with me.
17th July, 1667. The master of the mint and his wife, Mr. Williamson, Sir Nicholas Armourer, Sir Edward Bowyer, Sir Anthony Auger, and some other friends had dinner with me.
19th July, 1667. I went to Gravesend; the Dutch fleet still at anchor before the river, where I saw five of his Majesty's men-at-war encounter above twenty of the Dutch, in the bottom of the Hope, chasing them with many broadsides given and returned toward the buoy of the Nore, where the body of their fleet lay, which lasted till about midnight. One of their ships was fired, supposed by themselves, she being run on ground. Having seen this bold action, and their braving us so far up the river, I went home the next day, not without indignation[Pg 36] at our negligence, and the nation's reproach. It is well known who of the Commissioners of the Treasury gave advice that the charge of setting forth a fleet this year might be spared, Sir W. C. (William Coventry) by name.
19th July, 1667. I went to Gravesend; the Dutch fleet was still anchored in the river, where I saw five of His Majesty’s warships engage with more than twenty Dutch ships at the bottom of the Hope, exchanging many broadsides toward the buoy of the Nore, where their main fleet was located. This went on until about midnight. One of their ships caught fire, supposedly due to their own actions, as it had run aground. After witnessing this bold move and their challenges to us so far up the river, I returned home the next day, feeling quite upset about our negligence and the nation’s embarrassment. It’s well known who among the Treasury Commissioners suggested that we could skip funding a fleet this year, namely Sir W. C. (William Coventry).[Pg 36]
1st August, 1667. I received the sad news of Abraham Cowley's death, that incomparable poet and virtuous man, my very dear friend, and was greatly deplored.
1st August, 1667. I received the sad news of Abraham Cowley's death, that remarkable poet and good man, my very dear friend, and it was deeply mourned.
3d August, 1667. Went to Mr. Cowley's funeral, whose corpse lay at Wallingford House, and was thence conveyed to Westminster Abbey in a hearse with six horses and all funeral decency, near a hundred coaches of noblemen and persons of quality following; among these, all the wits of the town, divers bishops and clergymen. He was interred next Geoffry Chaucer, and near Spenser. A goodly monument is since erected to his memory.
3rd August, 1667. I attended Mr. Cowley's funeral, where his body was laid at Wallingford House before being taken to Westminster Abbey in a hearse pulled by six horses, with all the proper funeral decorum. Almost a hundred coaches from noblemen and people of status followed, including all the clever minds of the town, several bishops, and clergymen. He was buried next to Geoffrey Chaucer and close to Spenser. A fine monument has since been raised in his memory.
Now did his Majesty again dine in the presence, in ancient state, with music and all the court ceremonies, which had been interrupted since the late war.
Now his Majesty dined again in person, in traditional style, with music and all the court ceremonies that had been paused since the recent war.
8th August, 1667. Visited Mr. Oldenburg, a close prisoner in the Tower, being suspected of writing intelligence. I had an order from Lord Arlington, Secretary of State, which caused me to be admitted. This gentleman was secretary to our Society, and I am confident will prove an innocent person.
8th August, 1667. I visited Mr. Oldenburg, who is being held in the Tower as a suspected writer of intelligence. I had an order from Lord Arlington, the Secretary of State, which allowed me to see him. This gentleman was the secretary to our Society, and I believe he will be proven innocent.
15th August, 1667. Finished my account, amounting to £25,000.
15th August, 1667. Completed my account, totaling £25,000.
There was now a very gallant horse to be baited to death with dogs; but he fought them all, so as the fiercest of them could not fasten on him, till the men run him through with their swords. This wicked and barbarous sport deserved to have been punished in the cruel contrivers to get money, under pretense that the horse had killed a man, which was false. I would not be persuaded to be a spectator.
There was now a very brave horse that was being attacked by dogs until it died; but he fought them off so fiercely that none of them could latch onto him, until the men stabbed him with their swords. This cruel and barbaric sport deserved to be punished for the cruel planners who set it up just to make money, pretending that the horse had killed a man, which was a lie. I would not be convinced to watch.
21st August, 1667. Saw the famous Italian puppet-play, for it was no other.
21st August, 1667. I watched the famous Italian puppet show, because it was nothing less.
24th August, 1667. I was appointed, with the rest of my brother commissioners, to put in execution an order of Council for freeing the prisoners at war in my custody at Leeds Castle, and taking off his Majesty's extraordinary[Pg 37] charge, having called before us the French and Dutch agents. The peace was now proclaimed, in the usual form, by the heralds-at-arms.
24th August, 1667. I was assigned, along with my fellow commissioners, to implement an order from the Council to release the prisoners of war in my care at Leeds Castle, and to lift the extraordinary[Pg 37] charge from His Majesty, after we summoned the French and Dutch agents. The peace was now announced, as usual, by the heralds-at-arms.
25th August, 1667. After evening service, I went to visit Mr. Vaughan, who lay at Greenwich, a very wise and learned person, one of Mr. Selden's executors and intimate friends.
25th August, 1667. After evening service, I went to visit Mr. Vaughan, who was at Greenwich, a very wise and knowledgeable person, one of Mr. Selden's executors and close friends.
27th August, 1667. Visited the Lord Chancellor, to whom his Majesty had sent for the seals a few days before; I found him in his bedchamber, very sad. The Parliament had accused him, and he had enemies at Court, especially the buffoons and ladies of pleasure, because he thwarted some of them, and stood in their way; I could name some of the chief. The truth is, he made few friends during his grandeur among the royal sufferers, but advanced the old rebels. He was, however, though no considerable lawyer, one who kept up the form and substance of things in the Nation with more solemnity than some would have had. He was my particular kind friend, on all occasions. The cabal, however, prevailed, and that party in Parliament. Great division at Court concerning him, and divers great persons interceding for him.
27th August, 1667. I visited the Lord Chancellor, who had been summoned by his Majesty for the seals a few days earlier; I found him in his bedroom, looking very upset. Parliament had accused him, and he had enemies at Court, especially the courtiers and ladies of the night, because he had opposed some of them and blocked their plans; I could name some of the key players. The truth is, he didn't make many friends during his time in power among the royal circle but favored the old rebels. He was, however, despite not being a significant lawyer, someone who maintained the form and substance of affairs in the Nation with more seriousness than some would have preferred. He was my good friend on all occasions. Nevertheless, the opposition won out, along with that faction in Parliament. There was considerable division at Court about him, and several prominent figures were advocating for him.
28th August, 1667. I dined with my late Lord Chancellor, where also dined Mr. Ashburnham, and Mr. W. Legge, of the bedchamber; his Lordship pretty well in heart, though now many of his friends and sycophants abandoned him.
28th August, 1667. I had dinner with my late Lord Chancellor, along with Mr. Ashburnham and Mr. W. Legge, of the bedchamber; his Lordship seemed to be in good spirits, even though many of his friends and flatterers had deserted him.
In the afternoon, to the Lords Commissioners for money, and thence to the audience of a Russian Envoy in the Queen's presence-chamber, introduced with much state, the soldiers, pensioners, and guards in their order. His letters of credence brought by his secretary in a scarf of sarsenet, their vests sumptuous, much embroidered with pearls. He delivered his speech in the Russ language, but without the least action, or motion, of his body, which was immediately interpreted aloud by a German that spoke good English: half of it consisted in repetition of the Czar's titles, which were very haughty and oriental: the substance of the rest was, that he was only sent to see the King and Queen, and know how they did, with much compliment and frothy language. Then, they kissed their Majesties' hands, and went as they came; but their real errand was to get money.[Pg 38]
In the afternoon, the Lords Commissioners for money welcomed a Russian Envoy in the Queen's presence chamber, with much ceremony, accompanied by soldiers, pensioners, and guards. His credentials were brought by his secretary, draped in a silk scarf, and their outfits were lavish, heavily embroidered with pearls. He delivered his speech in Russian, but without any body language or gestures, which was then interpreted aloud by a German who spoke good English. Half of his speech was just repeating the Czar's titles, which were quite grand and elaborate. The main point was that he was only there to see the King and Queen and check on their well-being, filled with compliments and flowery language. Afterward, they kissed the Majesties' hands and left as they had arrived, but their true purpose was to ask for money.[Pg 38]
29th August, 1667. We met at the Star-chamber about exchange and release of prisoners.
29th August, 1667. We gathered at the Star Chamber to discuss the exchange and release of prisoners.
7th September, 1667. Came Sir John Kiviet, to article with me about his brickwork.
7th September, 1667. Sir John Kiviet came to discuss his brickwork with me.
13th September, 1667. Between the hours of twelve and one, was born my second daughter, who was afterward christened Elizabeth.
13th September, 1667. Between noon and one, my second daughter was born, and she was later named Elizabeth.
19th September, 1667. To London, with Mr. Henry Howard, of Norfolk, of whom I obtained the gift of his Arundelian marbles, those celebrated and famous inscriptions, Greek and Latin, gathered with so much cost and industry from Greece, by his illustrious grandfather, the magnificent Earl of Arundel, my noble friend while he lived. When I saw these precious monuments miserably neglected, and scattered up and down about the garden, and other parts of Arundel House, and how exceedingly the corrosive air of London impaired them, I procured him to bestow them on the University of Oxford. This he was pleased to grant me; and now gave me the key of the gallery, with leave to mark all those stones, urns, altars, etc., and whatever I found had inscriptions on them, that were not statues. This I did; and getting them removed and piled together, with those which were incrusted in the garden walls, I sent immediately letters to the Vice-Chancellor of what I had procured, and that if they esteemed it a service to the University (of which I had been a member), they should take order for their transportation.
19th September, 1667. I went to London with Mr. Henry Howard from Norfolk, who gave me his Arundelian marbles, those famous inscriptions in Greek and Latin that his distinguished grandfather, the magnificent Earl of Arundel, collected at great expense and effort from Greece. He was my noble friend while he was alive. When I saw these valuable artifacts sadly neglected and spread out across the garden and other parts of Arundel House, and how much the polluted air of London was damaging them, I convinced him to donate them to the University of Oxford. He kindly agreed and gave me the key to the gallery, allowing me to identify all the stones, urns, altars, etc., with inscriptions on them that were not statues. I did this, and after getting them removed and stacked together with those embedded in the garden walls, I quickly sent letters to the Vice-Chancellor about what I had obtained, suggesting that if they thought it would benefit the University (of which I had been a member), they should arrange for their transportation.
This done 21st, I accompanied Mr. Howard to his villa at Albury, where I designed for him the plot of his canal and garden, with a crypt through the hill.
This done on the 21st, I went with Mr. Howard to his villa at Albury, where I planned the layout for his canal and garden, including a tunnel through the hill.
24th September, 1667. Returned to London, where I had orders to deliver the possession of Chelsea College (used as my prison during the war with Holland for such as were sent from the fleet to London) to our Society, as a gift of his Majesty, our founder.
24th September, 1667. I returned to London, where I was instructed to hand over Chelsea College (which served as my prison during the war with Holland for those sent from the fleet to London) to our Society, as a gift from His Majesty, our founder.
8th October, 1667. Came to dine with me Dr. Bathurst, Dean of Wells, President of Trinity College, sent by the Vice-Chancellor of Oxford, in the name both of him and the whole University, to thank me for procuring the inscriptions, and to receive my directions what was to be done to show their gratitude to Mr. Howard.
8th October, 1667. Dr. Bathurst, Dean of Wells and President of Trinity College, came to dine with me. He was sent by the Vice-Chancellor of Oxford, on behalf of himself and the entire University, to thank me for securing the inscriptions and to get my guidance on how to express their gratitude to Mr. Howard.
11th October, 1667. I went to see Lord Clarendon, late[Pg 39] Lord Chancellor and greatest officer in England, in continual apprehension what the Parliament would determine concerning him.
11th October, 1667. I went to see Lord Clarendon, former[Pg 39] Lord Chancellor and the highest official in England, constantly worried about what Parliament would decide regarding him.
17th October, 1667. Came Dr. Barlow, Provost of Queen's College and Protobibliothecus of the Bodleian library, to take order about the transportation of the marbles.
17th October, 1667. Dr. Barlow, the Provost of Queen's College and the main librarian of the Bodleian library, came to make arrangements for the transportation of the marbles.
25th October, 1667. There were delivered to me two letters from the Vice-Chancellor of Oxford, with the Decree of the Convocation, attested by the Public Notary, ordering four Doctors of Divinity and Law to acknowledge the obligation the University had to me for procuring the Marmora Arundeliana, which was solemnly done by Dr. Barlow, Dr. Jenkins, Judge of the Admiralty, Dr. Lloyd, and Obadiah Walker, of University College, who having made a large compliment from the University, delivered me the decree fairly written;
25th October, 1667. I received two letters from the Vice-Chancellor of Oxford, along with a decree from the Convocation, certified by the Public Notary. This decree instructed four Doctors of Divinity and Law to acknowledge the University’s obligation to me for acquiring the Marmora Arundeliana. This was formally done by Dr. Barlow, Dr. Jenkins, Judge of the Admiralty, Dr. Lloyd, and Obadiah Walker from University College, who presented me with a formal written copy of the decree after delivering a generous compliment from the University.
Gesta venerabili domo Convocationis Universitatis Oxon.; . . 17. 1667. Quo die retulit ad Senatum Academicum Dominus Vicecancellarius, quantum Universitas deberet singulari benevolentiæ Johannis Evelini Armigeri, qui pro eâ pietate quâ Almam Matrem prosequitur non solum Suasu et Consilio apud inclytum Heroem Henricum Howard, Ducis Norfolciæ hæredem, intercessit, et Universitati pretiosissimum eruditæ antiquitatis thesaurum Marmora Arundeliana largiretur; sed egregium insuper in ijs colligendis asservandisq; navavit operam: Quapropter unanimi suffragio Venerabilis Domûs decretum est, at eidem publicæ gratiæ per delegatos ad Honoratissimum Dominum Henricum Howard propediem mittendos solemnitèr reddantur.
On the esteemed day of the Convocation of the University of Oxford; . . 17. In 1667, on this day, the Vice-Chancellor reported to the Academic Senate how much the University owed to the exceptional kindness of John Evelyn, who, for his dedication to the Alma Mater, not only intervened with advice and counsel to the illustrious Hero Henry Howard, heir of the Duke of Norfolk, but also generously offered the University the priceless collection of the Arundel Marbles, a treasure of learned antiquity; moreover, he also exerted excellent effort in collecting and preserving these items. Therefore, by unanimous vote, it was decreed by the Venerable House that public thanks should be formally sent through delegates to the Honorable Lord Henry Howard soon.
Concordant superscripta cum originali collatione fâcta per me Ben. Cooper,
Agreed upon writings compared with the original made by me, Ben. Cooper,
Notarium Publicum et Registarium Universitat Oxon.
Public Notary and Registry of the University of Oxford.
"Sir:
"Sir:"
"We intend also a noble inscription, in which also honorable mention shall be made of yourself; but Mr. Vice-Chancellor commands me to tell you that that was not sufficient for your merits; but, that if your occasions would permit you to come down at the Act (when we intend a dedication of our new Theater), some other testimony should be given both of your own worth and affection to this your old mother; for we are all very sensible that this great addition of learning and reputation to the University is due as well to your industrious care for the University, and interest with my Lord Howard, as to his great nobleness and generosity of spirit.
"We also plan to have a noble inscription that will honor you; however, Mr. Vice-Chancellor asked me to let you know that this alone doesn't do justice to your contributions. If you can, we'd love for you to attend the Act (when we plan to dedicate our new Theater), as we want to give an additional acknowledgment of your value and your affection for your old alma mater. We all recognize that this significant boost in knowledge and prestige for the University is thanks to both your hard work on its behalf and your connection with my Lord Howard, as well as his great nobility and generous spirit."
"Obadiah Walker, University College."
The Vice-Chancellor's letter to the same effect was too vainglorious to insert, with divers copies of verses that[Pg 40] were also sent me. Their mentioning me in the inscription I totally declined, when I directed the titles of Mr. Howard, now made Lord, upon his Ambassage to Morocco.
The Vice-Chancellor's letter on the same subject was too boastful to include, along with several copies of poems that[Pg 40] were also sent to me. I completely rejected their mention of me in the inscription when I addressed the titles of Mr. Howard, now titled Lord, regarding his mission to Morocco.
These four doctors, having made me this compliment, desired me to carry and introduce them to Mr. Howard, at Arundel House; which I did, Dr. Barlow (Provost of Queen's) after a short speech, delivering a larger letter of the University's thanks, which was written in Latin, expressing the great sense they had of the honor done them. After this compliment handsomely performed and as nobly received, Mr. Howard accompanied the doctors to their coach. That evening I supped with them.
These four doctors, after complimenting me, asked me to take them to meet Mr. Howard at Arundel House; I obliged. Dr. Barlow (the Provost of Queen's) gave a brief speech and then handed over a larger letter of thanks from the University, which was written in Latin, showing their appreciation for the honor given to them. After this compliment was graciously received, Mr. Howard walked the doctors to their coach. That evening, I had dinner with them.
26th October, 1667. My late Lord Chancellor was accused by Mr. Seymour in the House of Commons; and, in the evening, I returned home.
26th October, 1667. My late Lord Chancellor was accused by Mr. Seymour in the House of Commons; and, in the evening, I returned home.
31st October, 1667. My birthday—blessed be God for all his mercies! I made the Royal Society a present of the Table of Veins, Arteries, and Nerves, which great curiosity I had caused to be made in Italy, out of the natural human bodies, by a learned physician, and the help of Veslingius (professor at Padua), from whence I brought them in 1646. For this I received the public thanks of the Society; and they are hanging up in their repository with an inscription.
31st October, 1667. My birthday—thank God for all His blessings! I donated the Table of Veins, Arteries, and Nerves to the Royal Society, which was created in Italy from actual human bodies by a knowledgeable physician, with assistance from Veslingius (a professor at Padua), which I brought back in 1646. For this, I received public thanks from the Society, and it’s displayed in their repository with an inscription.
9th December, 1667. To visit the late Lord Chancellor.13 I found him in his garden at his new-built palace, sitting in his gout wheel-chair, and seeing the gates setting up toward the north and the fields. He looked and spake very disconsolately. After some while deploring his condition to me, I took my leave. Next morning, I heard he was gone; though I am persuaded that, had he gone sooner, though but to Cornbury, and there lain quiet, it would have satisfied the Parliament. That which exasperated them was his presuming to stay and contest the[Pg 41] accusation as long as it was possible: and they were on the point of sending him to the Tower.
9th December, 1667. To visit the late Lord Chancellor.13 I found him in his garden at his newly built palace, sitting in his gout wheelchair, looking at the gates facing north and the fields. He appeared very disheartened and spoke sadly. After some time of him lamenting his situation to me, I took my leave. The next morning, I heard he had passed away; though I believe that if he had left sooner, even just to Cornbury, and rested there quietly, it would have satisfied Parliament. What upset them was his decision to stay and fight the accusation for as long as he could: they were about to send him to the Tower.
21st December, 1667. I saw one Carr pilloried at Charing-cross for a libel, which was burnt before him by the hangman.
21st December, 1667. I saw someone named Carr put in the stocks at Charing Cross for a libel, which was burned in front of him by the executioner.
8th January, 1667-68. I saw deep and prodigious gaming at the Groom-Porter's, vast heaps of gold squandered away in a vain and profuse manner. This I looked on as a horrid vice, and unsuitable in a Christian Court.
8th January, 1667-68. I witnessed intense and extravagant gambling at the Groom-Porter's, with vast piles of gold wasted in a foolish and excessive way. I regarded this as a terrible vice, inappropriate for a Christian Court.
9th January, 1668. Went to see the revels at the Middle Temple, which is also an old riotous custom, and has relation neither to virtue nor policy.
9th January, 1668. Went to check out the festivities at the Middle Temple, which is an old wild tradition, and has nothing to do with virtue or good governance.
10th January, 1668. To visit Mr. Povey, where were divers great Lords to see his well-contrived cellar, and other elegancies.
10th January, 1668. To visit Mr. Povey, where several high-ranking Lords were there to see his well-designed cellar and other fine features.
24th January, 1668. We went to stake out ground for building a college for the Royal Society at Arundel-House, but did not finish it, which we shall repent of.
24th January, 1668. We went to mark out the land for building a college for the Royal Society at Arundel House, but we didn’t finish it, and we will regret that.
4th February, 1668. I saw the tragedy of "Horace" (written by the VIRTUOUS Mrs. Philips) acted before their Majesties. Between each act a masque and antique dance. The excessive gallantry of the ladies was infinite, those especially on that ... Castlemaine, esteemed at £40,000 and more, far outshining the Queen.
4th February, 1668. I watched "Horace" (written by the VIRTUOUS Mrs. Philips) performed for their Majesties. In between each act, there was a masque and an old-fashioned dance. The ladies were incredibly elegant, especially that ... Castlemaine, valued at £40,000 and more, greatly outshining the Queen.
15th February, 1668. I saw the audience of the Swedish Ambassador Count Donna, in great state in the banqueting house.
15th February, 1668. I witnessed the audience with the Swedish Ambassador, Count Donna, held in grand style in the banquet hall.
3d March, 1668. Was launched at Deptford, that goodly vessel, "The Charles." I was near his Majesty. She is longer than the "Sovereign," and carries 110 brass cannon; she was built by old Shish, a plain, honest carpenter, master-builder of this dock, but one who can give very little account of his art by discourse, and is hardly capable of reading, yet of great ability in his calling. The family have been ship carpenters in this yard above 300 years.
3rd March, 1668. The impressive ship, "The Charles," was launched at Deptford. I was nearby with His Majesty. She is longer than the "Sovereign" and carries 110 brass cannons. She was built by old Shish, a straightforward, honest carpenter who is the master builder of this dock. He doesn’t express much about his craft in words and can hardly read, yet he is highly skilled in his trade. His family has been ship carpenters in this yard for over 300 years.
12th March, 1668. Went to visit Sir John Cotton, who had me into his library, full of good MSS., Greek and Latin, but most famous for those of the Saxon and English antiquities, collected by his grandfather.
12th March, 1668. I visited Sir John Cotton, who welcomed me into his library, filled with valuable manuscripts in Greek and Latin, but especially renowned for the collection of Saxon and English antiquities gathered by his grandfather.
2d April, 1668. To the Royal Society, where I sub[Pg 42]scribed 50,000 bricks, toward building a college. Among other libertine libels, there was one now printed and thrown about, a bold petition of the poor w——s to Lady Castlemaine.14
2d April 1668. To the Royal Society, where I contributed 50,000 bricks towards building a college. Among other scandalous pamphlets, there was one currently printed and circulated, a daring petition from the poor women to Lady Castlemaine.14
9th April, 1668. To London, about finishing my grand account of the sick and wounded, and prisoners at war, amounting to above £34,000.
9th April, 1668. To London, to wrap up my detailed report on the sick, injured, and prisoners of war, totaling over £34,000.
I heard Sir R. Howard impeach Sir William Penn, in the House of Lords, for breaking bulk, and taking away rich goods out of the East India prizes, formerly taken by Lord Sandwich.
I heard Sir R. Howard accuse Sir William Penn in the House of Lords for breaking bulk and taking valuable goods from the East India prizes that were previously captured by Lord Sandwich.
28th April, 1668. To London, about the purchase of Ravensbourne Mills, and land around it, in Upper Deptford, of one Mr. Becher.
28th April, 1668. To London, regarding the purchase of Ravensbourne Mills and the surrounding land in Upper Deptford from a Mr. Becher.
30th April, 1668. We sealed the deeds in Sir Edward Thurland's chambers in the Inner Temple. I pray God bless it to me, it being a dear pennyworth; but the passion Sir R. Browne had for it, and that it was contiguous to our other grounds, engaged me!
30th April, 1668. We signed the documents in Sir Edward Thurland's office in the Inner Temple. I hope God blesses it for me, as it was a valuable purchase; but Sir R. Browne's strong desire for it, along with its proximity to our other lands, convinced me!
13th May, 1668. Invited by that expert commander, Captain Cox, master of the lately built "Charles II.," now the best vessel of the fleet, designed for the Duke of York, I went to Erith, where we had a great dinner.
13th May, 1668. Invited by that skilled captain, Captain Cox, who was in charge of the recently built "Charles II.," now the finest ship in the fleet, created for the Duke of York, I went to Erith, where we enjoyed a wonderful dinner.
16th May, 1668. Sir Richard Edgecombe, of Mount Edgecombe, by Plymouth, my relation, came to visit me; a very virtuous and worthy gentleman.
16th May, 1668. Sir Richard Edgecombe, from Mount Edgecombe near Plymouth, my relative, came to visit me; a truly virtuous and admirable gentleman.
19th June, 1668. To a new play with several of my relations, "The Evening Lover," a foolish plot, and very profane; it afflicted me to see how the stage was degenerated and polluted by the licentious times.
19th June, 1668. Went to a new play with some of my family, "The Evening Lover," which had a silly plot and was very inappropriate; it upset me to see how much the stage had declined and been tainted by the immoral times.
2d July, 1668. Sir Samuel Tuke, Bart., and the lady he had married this day, came and bedded at night at my house, many friends accompanying the bride.
2d July, 1668. Sir Samuel Tuke, Bart., and the lady he married today came and stayed overnight at my house, along with many friends who accompanied the bride.
23d July, 1668. At the Royal Society, were presented divers glossa petras, and other natural curiosities, found in digging to build the fort at Sheerness. They were just the same as they bring from Malta, pretending them to be viper's teeth, whereas, in truth, they are of a shark, as we found by comparing them with one in our repository.
23rd July, 1668. At the Royal Society, various glossa petras and other natural curiosities were presented, discovered while digging to construct the fort at Sheerness. They were identical to those brought from Malta, which are claimed to be viper's teeth, but in reality, they are from a shark, as we confirmed by comparing them with one in our collection.
3d August, 1668. Mr. Bramstone (son to Judge B.), my old fellow-traveler, now reader at the Middle Temple,[Pg 43] invited me to his feast, which was so very extravagant and great as the like had not been seen at any time. There were the Duke of Ormond, Privy Seal, Bedford, Belasis, Halifax, and a world more of Earls and Lords.
3rd August, 1668. Mr. Bramstone (son of Judge B.), my old travel buddy, who is now a reader at the Middle Temple,[Pg 43] invited me to his feast, which was so extravagant and grand that nothing like it had ever been seen before. There were the Duke of Ormond, Privy Seal, Bedford, Belasis, Halifax, and a ton of other Earls and Lords.
14th August, 1668. His Majesty was pleased to grant me a lease of a slip of ground out of Brick Close, to enlarge my fore-court, for which I now gave him thanks; then, entering into other discourse, he talked to me of a new varnish for ships, instead of pitch, and of the gilding with which his new yacht was beautified. I showed his Majesty the perpetual motion sent to me by Dr. Stokes, from Cologne; and then came in Monsieur Colbert, the French Ambassador.
14th August, 1668. His Majesty kindly granted me a lease for a piece of land from Brick Close to expand my front yard, for which I expressed my gratitude; then, in another conversation, he discussed a new varnish for ships as an alternative to pitch, and the gilding used to enhance his new yacht. I showed his Majesty the perpetual motion device that Dr. Stokes sent me from Cologne; and then Monsieur Colbert, the French Ambassador, arrived.
19th August, 1668. I saw the magnificent entry of the French Ambassador Colbert, received in the banqueting house. I had never seen a richer coach than that which he came in to Whitehall. Standing by his Majesty at dinner in the presence, there was of that rare fruit called the king-pine, growing in Barbadoes and the West Indies; the first of them I had ever seen. His Majesty having cut it up, was pleased to give me a piece off his own plate to taste of; but, in my opinion, it falls short of those ravishing varieties of deliciousness described in Captain Ligon's history, and others; but possibly it might, or certainly was, much impaired in coming so far; it has yet a grateful acidity, but tastes more like the quince and melon than of any other fruit he mentions.
19th August, 1668. I witnessed the impressive arrival of the French Ambassador Colbert, who was welcomed in the banquet hall. I had never seen a more extravagant coach than the one he arrived in at Whitehall. While standing by His Majesty at dinner, there was that rare fruit called the king-pine, which grows in Barbados and the West Indies; it was the first time I'd ever seen one. His Majesty kindly cut it up and offered me a piece from his own plate to try; however, in my opinion, it doesn't compare to the amazing flavors described in Captain Ligon's writings and others. But it might have been affected by the long journey. It does have a pleasant acidity, though it tastes more like quince and melon than any of the other fruits he mentions.
28th August, 1668. Published my book on "The Perfection of Painting," dedicated to Mr. Howard.
28th August, 1668. Published my book on "The Perfection of Painting," dedicated to Mr. Howard.
17th September, 1668. I entertained Signor Muccinigo, the Venetian Ambassador, of one of the noblest families of the State, this being the day of making his public entry, setting forth from my house with several gentlemen of Venice and others in a very glorious train. He staid with me till the Earl of Anglesea and Sir Charles Cotterell (master of the ceremonies) came with the King's barge to carry him to the Tower, where the guns were fired at his landing; he then entered his Majesty's coach, followed by many others of the nobility. I accompanied him to his house, where there was a most noble supper to all the company, of course. After the extraordinary compliments to me and my wife, for the civilities he received at my house, I took leave and returned. He is[Pg 44] a very accomplished person. He is since Ambassador at Rome.
17th September, 1668. I hosted Signor Muccinigo, the Venetian Ambassador from one of the most prestigious families in the State, on the day of his public entry. He left my house accompanied by several gentlemen from Venice and others in a grand procession. He stayed with me until the Earl of Anglesea and Sir Charles Cotterell (the master of ceremonies) arrived with the King's barge to take him to the Tower, where cannon fire welcomed his arrival. He then got into the King's coach, followed by many other nobles. I accompanied him to his residence, where a magnificent dinner was organized for all the guests. After he and his companions offered extraordinary compliments to my wife and me for our hospitality, I took my leave and returned home. He is [Pg 44] a highly refined individual. He later became the Ambassador in Rome.
29th September, 1668. I had much discourse with Signor Pietro Cisij, a Persian gentleman, about the affairs of Turkey, to my great satisfaction. I went to see Sir Elias Leighton's project of a cart with iron axletrees.
29th September, 1668. I had a lengthy conversation with Signor Pietro Cisij, a Persian gentleman, about the situation in Turkey, which I found very satisfying. I went to check out Sir Elias Leighton's design for a cart with iron axles.
8th November, 1668. Being at dinner, my sister Evelyn sent for me to come up to London to my continuing sick brother.
8th November, 1668. While having dinner, my sister Evelyn called for me to come up to London to see my sick brother.
14th November, 1668. To London, invited to the consecration of that excellent person, the Dean of Ripon, Dr. Wilkins, now made Bishop of Chester; it was at Ely House, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Cosin, Bishop of Durham, the Bishops of Ely, Salisbury, Rochester, and others officiating. Dr. Tillotson preached. Then, we went to a sumptuous dinner in the hall, where were the Duke of Buckingham, Judges, Secretaries of State, Lord-Keeper, Council, Noblemen, and innumerable other company, who were honorers of this incomparable man, universally beloved by all who knew him.
14th November, 1668. I went to London for the celebration of the amazing Dean of Ripon, Dr. Wilkins, who has now become the Bishop of Chester. The event took place at Ely House, with the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Cosin, Bishop of Durham, the Bishops of Ely, Salisbury, Rochester, and others officiating. Dr. Tillotson gave the sermon. Afterwards, we attended a lavish dinner in the hall, where there were the Duke of Buckingham, judges, secretaries of state, the Lord Keeper, council members, nobles, and countless other guests who came to honor this extraordinary man, universally loved by all who knew him.
This being the Queen's birthday, great was the gallantry at Whitehall, and the night celebrated with very fine fireworks.
This being the Queen's birthday, there was a lot of excitement at Whitehall, and the night was celebrated with some really impressive fireworks.
My poor brother continuing ill, I went not from him till the 17th, when, dining at the Groom Porters, I heard Sir Edward Sutton play excellently on the Irish harp; he performs genteelly, but not approaching my worthy friend, Mr. Clark, a gentleman of Northumberland, who makes it execute lute, viol, and all the harmony an instrument is capable of; pity it is that it is not more in use; but, indeed, to play well, takes up the whole man, as Mr. Clark has assured me, who, though a gentleman of quality and parts, was yet brought up to that instrument from five years old, as I remember he told me.
My poor brother was still unwell, so I stayed with him until the 17th. That day, while having dinner at the Groom Porters, I heard Sir Edward Sutton play wonderfully on the Irish harp. He plays gracefully, but he doesn't match my good friend, Mr. Clark, a gentleman from Northumberland, who can make it produce the sounds of a lute, viol, and all the music any instrument is capable of. It's a shame that the harp isn't used more often; however, as Mr. Clark explained to me, playing it well takes complete dedication. Despite being a man of high status and talent, he started learning the instrument when he was just five years old, as I recall him telling me.
25th November, 1668. I waited on Lord Sandwich, who presented me with a Sembrador he brought out of Spain, showing me his two books of observations made during his embassy and stay at Madrid, in which were several rare things he promised to impart to me.
25th November, 1668. I visited Lord Sandwich, who gave me a Sembrador he had brought back from Spain. He showed me his two books of observations made during his time in Madrid, which contained several unique items he promised to share with me.
27th November, 1668. I dined at my Lord Ashley's (since Earl of Shaftesbury), when the match of my niece was proposed for his only son, in which my assistance was desired for my Lord.[Pg 45]
27th November, 1668. I had dinner at my Lord Ashley's (now the Earl of Shaftesbury), where the match for my niece was suggested for his only son, and my help was requested on behalf of my Lord.[Pg 45]
28th November, 1668. Dr. Patrick preached at Convent Garden, on Acts xvii. 31, the certainty of Christ's coming to judgment, it being Advent; a most suitable discourse.
28th November, 1668. Dr. Patrick preached at Convent Garden on Acts xvii. 31, the certainty of Christ's coming to judgment, as it was Advent; a very fitting sermon.
19th December, 1668. I went to see the old play of "Cataline" acted, having been now forgotten almost forty years.
19th December, 1668. I went to watch the old play "Cataline," which has been nearly forgotten for almost forty years.
20th December, 1668. I dined with my Lord Cornbury, at Clarendon House, now bravely furnished, especially with the pictures of most of our ancient and modern wits, poets, philosophers, famous and learned Englishmen; which collection of the Chancellor's I much commended, and gave his Lordship a catalogue of more to be added.
20th December, 1668. I had dinner with Lord Cornbury at Clarendon House, which is now nicely decorated, especially with portraits of many of our great and modern thinkers, poets, philosophers, and renowned English figures. I really praised this collection from the Chancellor and gave his Lordship a list of more to add.
31st December, 1668. I entertained my kind neighbors, according to custom, giving Almighty God thanks for his gracious mercies to me the past year.
31st December, 1668. I hosted my kind neighbors, as is customary, giving thanks to Almighty God for His generous blessings over the past year.
1st January, 1669. Imploring his blessing for the year entering, I went to church, where our Doctor preached on Psalm lxv. 12, apposite to the season, and beginning a new year.
1st January, 1669. Seeking his blessing for the new year, I went to church, where our doctor preached on Psalm 65:12, fitting for the season and the start of a new year.
3d January, 1669. About this time one of Sir William Penn's sons had published a blasphemous book against the Deity of our Blessed Lord.
3rd January, 1669. Around this time, one of Sir William Penn's sons published a disrespectful book against the divinity of our Blessed Lord.
29th January, 1669. I went to see a tall gigantic woman who measured 6 feet 10 inches high, at 21 years old, born in the Low Countries.
29th January, 1669. I went to see a tall, gigantic woman who was 6 feet 10 inches tall, at 21 years old, born in the Low Countries.
13th February, 1669. I presented his Majesty with my "History of the Four Impostors;"15 he told me of other like cheats. I gave my book to Lord Arlington, to whom I dedicated it. It was now that he began to tempt me about writing "The Dutch War."
13th February, 1669. I gave his Majesty my "History of the Four Impostors;"15 and he shared stories of other similar frauds. I gave my book to Lord Arlington, who I dedicated it to. It was then that he started encouraging me to write "The Dutch War."
15th February, 1669. Saw Mrs. Phillips' "Horace" acted again.
15th February, 1669. Watched Mrs. Phillips' "Horace" performed again.
18th February, 1669. To the Royal Society, when Signor Malpighi, an Italian physician and anatomist, sent this learned body the incomparable "History of the Silk-worm."
18th February, 1669. To the Royal Society, when Signor Malpighi, an Italian doctor and anatomist, sent this esteemed group the remarkable "History of the Silk-worm."
1st March, 1669. Dined at Lord Arlington's at Goring House, with the Bishop of Hereford.
1st March, 1669. Had dinner at Lord Arlington's at Goring House, with the Bishop of Hereford.
4th March, 1669. To the Council of the Royal Society, about disposing my Lord Howard's library, now given to us.[Pg 46]
4th March, 1669. To the Council of the Royal Society, about organizing my Lord Howard's library, which has now been donated to us.[Pg 46]
16th March, 1669. To London, to place Mr. Christopher Wase about my Lord Arlington.
16th March, 1669. To London, to set up Mr. Christopher Wase with my Lord Arlington.
18th March, 1669. I went with Lord Howard of Norfolk, to visit Sir William Ducie at Charlton, where we dined; the servants made our coachmen so drunk, that they both fell off their boxes on the heath, where we were fain to leave them, and were driven to London by two servants of my Lord's. This barbarous custom of making the masters welcome by intoxicating the servants, had now the second time happened to my coachmen.
18th March, 1669. I went with Lord Howard of Norfolk to visit Sir William Ducie at Charlton, where we had dinner; the staff got our coachmen so drunk that they both fell off their boxes on the heath, so we had to leave them there and were driven to London by two of my Lord's servants. This cruel tradition of making the hosts feel welcome by getting the servants drunk had happened to my coachmen for the second time now.
My son finally came from Oxford.
My son finally returned from Oxford.
2d April, 1669. Dined at Mr. Treasurer's, where was (with many noblemen) Colonel Titus of the bedchamber, author of the famous piece against Cromwell, "Killing no Murder."
2nd April, 1669. Had dinner at Mr. Treasurer's, where there were many noblemen, including Colonel Titus of the bedchamber, the author of the famous work against Cromwell, "Killing no Murder."
I now placed Mr. Wase with Mr. Williamson, Secretary to the Secretary of State, and Clerk of the Papers.
I now assigned Mr. Wase to work with Mr. Williamson, the Secretary to the Secretary of State, and the Clerk of the Papers.
14th April, 1669. I dined with the Archbishop of Canterbury, at Lambeth, and saw the library, which was not very considerable.
14th April, 1669. I had lunch with the Archbishop of Canterbury at Lambeth and checked out the library, which wasn't very impressive.
19th May, 1669. At a Council of the Royal Society our grant was finished, in which his Majesty gives us Chelsea College, and some land about it. It was ordered that five should be a quorum for a Council. The Vice-President was then sworn for the first time, and it was proposed how we should receive the Prince of Tuscany, who desired to visit the Society.
19th May, 1669. At a meeting of the Royal Society, our grant was finalized, in which the King gives us Chelsea College and some surrounding land. It was decided that five members would be a quorum for a Council. The Vice-President was sworn in for the first time, and it was suggested how we should welcome the Prince of Tuscany, who wanted to visit the Society.
20th May, 1669. This evening, at 10 o'clock, was born my third daughter, who was baptized on the 25th by the name of Susannah.
20th May, 1669. This evening, at 10 o'clock, my third daughter was born and was baptized on the 25th with the name Susannah.
3d June, 1669. Went to take leave of Lord Howard, going Ambassador to Morocco. Dined at Lord Arlington's, where were the Earl of Berkshire, Lord Saint John, Sir Robert Howard, and Sir R. Holmes.
3rd June, 1669. I went to say goodbye to Lord Howard, who is going to be the Ambassador to Morocco. I had lunch at Lord Arlington's, where the Earl of Berkshire, Lord Saint John, Sir Robert Howard, and Sir R. Holmes were present.
10th June, 1669. Came my Lord Cornbury, Sir William Pulteney, and others to visit me. I went this evening to London, to carry Mr. Pepys to my brother Richard, now exceedingly afflicted with the stone, who had been successfully cut, and carried the stone as big as a tennis ball to show him, and encourage his resolution to go through the operation.
10th June, 1669. My Lord Cornbury, Sir William Pulteney, and others came to visit me. I went to London this evening to take Mr. Pepys to see my brother Richard, who is now suffering a lot from kidney stones. He had been successfully operated on, and I brought the stone, which was as big as a tennis ball, to show him and encourage him to go through with the procedure.
30th June, 1669. My wife went a journey of pleasure[Pg 47] down the river as far as the sea, with Mrs. Howard and her daughter, the Maid of Honor, and others, among whom that excellent creature, Mrs. Blagg.16
30th June, 1669. My wife took a pleasure trip down the river as far as the sea, along with Mrs. Howard and her daughter, the Maid of Honor, and others, including the wonderful Mrs. Blagg.16
7th July, 1669. I went toward Oxford; lay at Little Wycomb.
7th July, 1669. I headed towards Oxford and stayed at Little Wycomb.
8th July, 1669. Oxford.
July 8, 1669. Oxford.
9th July, 1669. In the morning was celebrated the Encænia of the New Theater, so magnificently built by the munificence of Dr. Gilbert Sheldon, Archbishop of Canterbury, in which was spent,£25,000, as Sir Christopher Wren, the architect (as I remember), told me; and yet it was never seen by the benefactor, my Lord Archbishop having told me that he never did or ever would see it. It is, in truth, a fabric comparable to any of this kind of former ages, and doubtless exceeding any of the present, as this University does for colleges, libraries, schools, students, and order, all the universities in the world. To the theater is added the famous Sheldonian printing house. This being at the Act and the first time of opening the Theater (Acts being formerly kept in St. Mary's Church, which might be thought indecent, that being a place set apart for the immediate worship of God, and was the inducement for building this noble pile), it was now resolved to keep the present Act in it, and celebrate its dedication with the greatest splendor and formality that might be; and, therefore, drew a world of strangers, and other company, to the University, from all parts of the nation.
9th July, 1669. In the morning, the opening of the New Theater was celebrated, magnificently constructed through the generosity of Dr. Gilbert Sheldon, Archbishop of Canterbury, with an expenditure of £25,000, as Sir Christopher Wren, the architect, told me. Yet, the benefactor never saw it, as my Lord Archbishop mentioned he never did or would see it. Truly, it is a structure that rivals any from previous eras and clearly surpasses any current ones, just as this University excels all others in the world in terms of colleges, libraries, schools, students, and organization. The theater is complemented by the renowned Sheldonian printing house. Since this was during the Act and the first time the Theater was opened (previously, Acts were held in St. Mary’s Church, which seemed inappropriate since it is a space dedicated to the worship of God and the reason for constructing this grand building), it was decided to hold the present Act there and to dedicate it with the greatest splendor and formality possible, attracting many visitors and others to the University from all parts of the nation.
The Vice-Chancellor, Heads of Houses, and Doctors, being seated in magisterial seats, the Vice-Chancellor's chair and desk, Proctors, etc., covered with brocatelle (a kind of brocade) and cloth of gold; the University Registrar read the founder's grant and gift of it to the University for their scholastic exercises upon these solemn occasions. Then followed Dr. South, the University's orator, in an eloquent speech, which was very long, and not without some malicious and indecent reflections on the Royal Society, as underminers of the University; which was very foolish and untrue, as well as unseason[Pg 48]able. But, to let that pass from an ill-natured man, the rest was in praise of the Archbishop and the ingenious architect. This ended, after loud music from the corridor above, where an organ was placed, there followed divers panegyric speeches, both in prose and verse, interchangeably pronounced by the young students placed in the rostrums, in Pindarics, Eclogues, Heroics, etc., mingled with excellent music, vocal and instrumental, to entertain the ladies and the rest of the company. A speech was then made in praise of academical learning. This lasted from eleven in the morning till seven at night, which was concluded with ringing of bells, and universal joy and feasting.
The Vice-Chancellor, Heads of Houses, and Doctors were seated in their official chairs, with the Vice-Chancellor's chair and desk, Proctors, etc., covered in brocatelle (a type of brocade) and gold cloth. The University Registrar read the founder's grant and the donation to the University for their academic activities during these solemn occasions. Next, Dr. South, the University's orator, gave a long and eloquent speech, which included some spiteful and inappropriate remarks about the Royal Society, suggesting they were undermining the University. This was both foolish and false, as well as in bad taste. However, putting that aside from an ill-tempered individual, the remainder of the speech praised the Archbishop and the skilled architect. After this, there was loud music from the corridor above, where an organ was located. Following that, various panegyric speeches were delivered, both in prose and verse, by young students at the podiums, using Pindarics, Eclogues, Heroics, etc., interspersed with excellent vocal and instrumental music to entertain the ladies and the rest of the audience. A speech was then made praising academic learning. This all lasted from eleven in the morning until seven in the evening, concluding with the ringing of bells, and widespread celebration and feasting.
10th July, 1669. The next day began the more solemn lectures in all the faculties, which were performed in the several schools, where all the Inceptor-Doctors did their exercises, the Professors having first ended their reading. The assembly now returned to the Theater, where the Terræ filius (the University Buffoon) entertained the auditory with a tedious, abusive, sarcastical rhapsody, most unbecoming the gravity of the University, and that so grossly, that unless it be suppressed, it will be of ill consequence, as I afterward plainly expressed my sense of it both to the Vice-Chancellor and several Heads of Houses, who were perfectly ashamed of it, and resolved to take care of it in future. The old facetious way of rallying upon the questions was left off, falling wholly upon persons, so that it was rather licentious lying and railing than genuine and noble wit. In my life, I was never witness of so shameful an entertainment.
10th July, 1669. The next day began the more formal lectures in all the faculties, held in various schools, where all the newly graduated doctors performed their exercises after the professors had finished their readings. The assembly then returned to the Theater, where the Terræ filius (the University Buffoon) entertained the audience with a long, abusive, sarcastic rant that was completely inappropriate for the seriousness of the University. It was so offensive that unless it was stopped, it would lead to negative consequences. I later expressed my concerns about it to the Vice-Chancellor and several Heads of Houses, who were thoroughly embarrassed and resolved to address the issue moving forward. The old humorous practice of joking about topics was abandoned, instead focusing on individuals, resulting in what was more akin to vulgar insults than true and noble wit. In my life, I had never witnessed such a disgraceful performance.
After this ribaldry, the Proctors made their speeches. Then began the music art, vocal and instrumental, above in the balustrade corridor opposite to the Vice-Chancellor's seat. Then Dr. Wallis, the mathematical Professor, made his oration, and created one Doctor of music according to the usual ceremonies of gown (which was of white damask), cap, ring, kiss, etc. Next followed the disputations of the Inceptor-Doctors in Medicine, the speech of their Professor, Dr. Hyde, and so in course their respective creations. Then disputed the Inceptors of Law, the speech of their Professor, and creation. Lastly, Inceptors of Theology: Dr. Compton (brother of the Earl of Northampton) being junior, began with great modesty[Pg 49] and applause; so the rest. After which, Dr. Tillotson, Dr. Sprat, etc., and then Dr. Allestree's speech, the King's Professor, and their respective creations. Last of all, the Vice-Chancellor, shutting up the whole in a panegyrical oration, celebrating their benefactor and the rest, apposite to the occasion.
After this lively banter, the Proctors delivered their speeches. Then the music started, both vocal and instrumental, from the balcony corridor opposite the Vice-Chancellor's seat. Dr. Wallis, the math Professor, gave his speech and awarded one Doctor of Music following the usual ceremonies involving gown (which was made of white damask), cap, ring, kiss, and so on. Next came the debates from the Inceptor-Doctors in Medicine, including a speech from their Professor, Dr. Hyde, and their individual degrees. Following that were the Law Inceptors, their Professor's speech, and their degrees. Finally, it was the turn of the Theology Inceptors: Dr. Compton, the younger brother of the Earl of Northampton, began with great humility and received applause; then the others followed suit. After that, Dr. Tillotson, Dr. Sprat, and then Dr. Allestree delivered his speech, the King's Professor, along with their respective degrees. Lastly, the Vice-Chancellor wrapped up the event with a complimentary speech, honoring their benefactor and all relevant to the occasion.
Thus was the Theater dedicated by the scholastic exercises in all the Faculties with great solemnity; and the night, as the former, entertaining the new Doctor's friends in feasting and music. I was invited by Dr. Barlow, the worthy and learned Professor of Queen's College.
Thus, the Theater was officially dedicated through academic activities across all the faculties with great formality; and like before, the evening featured a celebration for the new Doctor’s friends, including feasting and music. I was invited by Dr. Barlow, the esteemed and knowledgeable Professor of Queen's College.
11th July, 1669. The Act sermon was this forenoon preached by Dr. Hall, in St. Mary's, in an honest, practical discourse against atheism. In the afternoon, the church was so crowded, that, not coming early, I could not approach to hear.
11th July, 1669. This morning, Dr. Hall delivered the Act sermon at St. Mary's, giving a sincere and practical talk against atheism. In the afternoon, the church was so packed that I couldn't get close enough to hear, as I didn't arrive early.
12th July, 1669. Monday. Was held the Divinity Act in the Theater again, when proceeded seventeen Doctors, in all Faculties some.
12th July, 1669. Monday. The Divinity Act was held in the Theater again, where seventeen Doctors from various faculties proceeded.
13th July, 1669. I dined at the Vice-Chancellor's, and spent the afternoon in seeing the rarities of the public libraries, and visiting the noble marbles and inscriptions, now inserted in the walls that compass the area of the Theater, which were 150 of the most ancient and worthy treasures of that kind in the learned world. Now, observing that people approach them too near, some idle persons began to scratch and injure them, I advised that a hedge of holly should be planted at the foot of the wall, to be kept breast-high only to protect them; which the Vice-Chancellor promised to do the next season.
13th July, 1669. I had dinner at the Vice-Chancellor's and spent the afternoon exploring the treasures of the public libraries and checking out the impressive marbles and inscriptions now set into the walls surrounding the area of the Theater. These were 150 of the oldest and most significant treasures of that kind in the scholarly world. Noticing that people were getting too close to them, and some careless individuals started to scratch and damage them, I suggested that a hedge of holly be planted at the base of the wall, kept to chest height, just to protect them. The Vice-Chancellor promised to take care of it by next season.
14th July, 1669. Dr. Fell, Dean of Christ Church and Vice-Chancellor, with Dr. Allestree, Professor, with beadles and maces before them, came to visit me at my lodging. I went to visit Lord Howard's sons at Magdalen College.
14th July, 1669. Dr. Fell, the Dean of Christ Church and Vice-Chancellor, along with Dr. Allestree, a professor, and some beadles and maces in front of them, came to visit me at my place. I went to see Lord Howard's sons at Magdalen College.
15th July, 1669. Having two days before had notice that the University intended me the honor of Doctorship, I was this morning attended by the beadles belonging to the Law, who conducted me to the Theater, where I found the Duke of Ormond (now Chancellor of the University) with the Earl of Chesterfield and Mr.[Pg 50] Spencer (brother to the late Earl of Sunderland). Thence, we marched to the Convocation House, a convocation having been called on purpose; here, being all of us robed in the porch, in scarlet with caps and hoods, we were led in by the Professor of Laws, and presented respectively by name, with a short eulogy, to the Vice-Chancellor, who sat in the chair, with all the Doctors and Heads of Houses and masters about the room, which was exceedingly full. Then, began the Public Orator his speech, directed chiefly to the Duke of Ormond, the Chancellor; but in which I had my compliment, in course. This ended, we were called up, and created Doctors according to the form, and seated by the Vice-Chancellor among the Doctors, on his right hand; then, the Vice-Chancellor made a short speech, and so, saluting our brother Doctors, the pageantry concluded, and the convocation was dissolved. So formal a creation of honorary Doctors had seldom been seen, that a convocation should be called on purpose, and speeches made by the Orator; but they could do no less, their Chancellor being to receive, or rather do them, this honor. I should have been made Doctor with the rest at the public Act, but their expectation of their Chancellor made them defer it. I was then led with my brother Doctors to an extraordinary entertainment at Doctor Mewes's, head of St. John's College, and, after abundance of feasting and compliments, having visited the Vice-Chancellor and other Doctors, and given them thanks for the honor done me, I went toward home the 16th, and got as far as Windsor, and so to my house the next day.
15th July, 1669. Two days ago, I was informed that the University intended to honor me with a Doctorate. This morning, I was accompanied by the beadles from the Law faculty, who guided me to the Theater, where I found the Duke of Ormond (the current Chancellor of the University) alongside the Earl of Chesterfield and Mr. [Pg 50] Spencer (brother of the late Earl of Sunderland). From there, we proceeded to the Convocation House, which had been specifically called for this occasion; here, we all robed in the porch in our scarlet gowns, wearing caps and hoods, were led in by the Professor of Laws and presented by name, along with a brief eulogy, to the Vice-Chancellor, who sat in the chair surrounded by all the Doctors, Heads of Houses, and masters, filling the room to capacity. Then, the Public Orator began his speech, primarily directed at the Duke of Ormond, the Chancellor, but I was also acknowledged along the way. Once this was finished, we were called up and formally made Doctors according to the tradition and seated by the Vice-Chancellor among the Doctors on his right side; afterward, the Vice-Chancellor delivered a brief speech, and with that, we greeted our fellow Doctors and the ceremony concluded, resulting in the dissolution of the convocation. Such a formal creation of honorary Doctors was rare, with a convocation specifically called and speeches given by the Orator; they could do no less since their Chancellor was to bestow this honor. I was supposed to be made Doctor along with the others at the public Act, but they postponed it in anticipation of their Chancellor. I was then taken with my fellow Doctors to a special celebration at Doctor Mewes's, head of St. John's College, where, after a lot of feasting and good words, I visited the Vice-Chancellor and other Doctors to thank them for the honor bestowed upon me. I then headed home on the 16th, reaching as far as Windsor, and returned to my house the next day.
4th August, 1669. I was invited by Sir Henry Peckham to his reading feast in the Middle Temple, a pompous entertainment, where were the Archbishop of Canterbury, all the great Earls and Lords, etc. I had much discourse with my Lord Winchelsea, a prodigious talker; and the Venetian Ambassador.
4th August, 1669. I was invited by Sir Henry Peckham to his reading feast in the Middle Temple, a grand event, where the Archbishop of Canterbury, all the prominent Earls and Lords, and others were present. I had a lengthy conversation with my Lord Winchelsea, who is quite the talker, and the Venetian Ambassador.
17th August, 1669. To London, spending almost the entire day in surveying what progress was made in rebuilding the ruinous city, which now began a little to revive after its sad calamity.
17th August, 1669. To London, spending almost the whole day looking over the progress made in rebuilding the damaged city, which was now starting to recover a bit after its tragic disaster.
20th August, 1669. I saw the splendid audience of the Danish Ambassador in the Banqueting House at Whitehall.[Pg 51]
20th August, 1669. I attended the impressive audience of the Danish Ambassador in the Banqueting House at Whitehall.[Pg 51]
23d August, 1669. I went to visit my most excellent and worthy neighbor, the Lord Bishop of Rochester, at Bromley, which he was now repairing, after the delapidations of the late Rebellion.
23rd August, 1669. I went to visit my esteemed neighbor, the Lord Bishop of Rochester, at Bromley, which he was currently fixing up after the damage from the recent Rebellion.
2d September, 1669. I was this day very ill of a pain in my limbs, which continued most of this week, and was increased by a visit I made to my old acquaintance, the Earl of Norwich, at his house in Epping Forest, where are many good pictures put into the wainscot of the rooms, which Mr. Baker, his Lordship's predecessor there, brought out of Spain; especially the History of Joseph, a picture of the pious and learned Picus Mirandula, and an incomparable one of old Breugel. The gardens were well understood, I mean the potager. I returned late in the evening, ferrying over the water at Greenwich.
2nd September, 1669. I was quite sick today with pain in my limbs, which lasted most of the week and got worse after visiting my old friend, the Earl of Norwich, at his home in Epping Forest. There are many beautiful paintings installed into the woodwork of the rooms, brought from Spain by Mr. Baker, his Lordship's predecessor; particularly the History of Joseph, a painting of the devout and knowledgeable Picus Mirandula, and an extraordinary piece by old Breugel. The gardens were well designed, especially the potager. I returned late in the evening, crossing the river at Greenwich.
3d October, 1669. I received the Blessed Eucharist, to my unspeakable joy.
3rd October, 1669. I received the Blessed Eucharist, which brought me immense joy.
21st October, 1669. To the Royal Society, meeting for the first time after a long recess, during vacation, according to custom; where was read a description of the prodigious eruption of Mount Etna; and our English itinerant presented an account of his autumnal peregrination about England, for which we hired him, bringing dried fowls, fish, plants, animals, etc.
21st October, 1669. To the Royal Society, meeting for the first time after a long break during vacation, as usual; where a description of the amazing eruption of Mount Etna was read; and our English traveler presented a report on his autumn journey around England, for which we hired him, bringing dried poultry, fish, plants, animals, etc.
26th October, 1669. My dear brother continued extremely full of pain, the Lord be gracious to him!
26th October, 1669. My dear brother is still in a lot of pain; may the Lord be merciful to him!
3d November, 1669. This being the day of meeting for the poor, we dined neighborly together.
3rd November, 1669. This is the day we gather for the poor, and we had a friendly meal together.
26th November, 1669. I heard an excellent discourse by Dr. Patrick, on the Resurrection, and afterward, visited the Countess of Kent, my kinswoman.
26th November, 1669. I heard a great talk by Dr. Patrick on the Resurrection, and afterwards, I visited the Countess of Kent, my relative.
8th December, 1669. To London, upon the second edition of my "Sylva," which I presented to the Royal Society.
8th December, 1669. To London, for the second edition of my "Sylva," which I presented to the Royal Society.
6th February, 1669-70. Dr. John Breton, Master of Emmanuel College, in Cambridge (uncle to our vicar), preached on John i. 27; "whose shoe-latchet I am not worthy to unloose," etc., describing the various fashions of shoes, or sandals, worn by the Jews, and other nations: of the ornaments of the feet: how great persons had[Pg 52] servants that took them off when they came to their houses, and bore them after them: by which pointing the dignity of our Savior, when such a person as St. John Baptist acknowledged his unworthiness even of that mean office. The lawfulness, decentness, and necessity, of subordinate degrees and ranks of men and servants, as well in the Church as State: against the late levelers, and others of that dangerous rabble, who would have all alike.
6th February, 1669-70. Dr. John Breton, Master of Emmanuel College in Cambridge (our vicar's uncle), preached on John 1:27; "whose shoe-latchet I am not worthy to unloose," etc. He talked about the different types of shoes and sandals worn by the Jews and other nations, the adornments for feet, and how important people had servants who would take their shoes off when they arrived home and carry them. This illustrated the dignity of our Savior, especially since even St. John the Baptist recognized his unworthiness for such a humble task. He discussed the appropriateness, respectability, and necessity of having different ranks and roles among men and servants, both in the Church and State, in opposition to the recent levelers and others in that dangerous group who wanted everyone to be the same.
3d March, 1670. Finding my brother [Richard] in such exceeding torture, and that he now began to fall into convulsion-fits, I solemnly set the next day apart to beg of God to mitigate his sufferings, and prosper the only means which yet remained for his recovery, he being not only much wasted, but exceedingly and all along averse from being cut (for the stone); but, when he at last consented, and it came to the operation, and all things prepared, his spirit and resolution failed.
3rd March, 1670. Seeing my brother [Richard] in such intense pain and starting to have convulsions, I decided to dedicate the next day to praying for God to ease his suffering and help the only option left for his recovery. He was not only very weak but also extremely reluctant to undergo surgery for the stone. However, when he finally agreed and it was time for the operation, he lost his courage and determination.
6th March, 1670. Dr. Patrick preached in Covent Garden Church. I participated of the Blessed Sacrament, recommending to God the deplorable condition of my dear brother, who was almost in the last agonies of death. I watched late with him this night. It pleased God to deliver him out of this miserable life, toward five o'clock this Monday morning, to my unspeakable grief. He was a brother whom I most dearly loved, for his many virtues; but two years younger than myself, a sober, prudent, worthy gentleman. He had married a great fortune, and left one only daughter, and a noble seat at Woodcot, near Epsom. His body was opened, and a stone taken out of his bladder, not much bigger than a nutmeg. I returned home on the 8th, full of sadness, and to bemoan my loss.
6th March, 1670. Dr. Patrick preached in Covent Garden Church. I took part in the Blessed Sacrament, asking God to help my dear brother, who was close to death. I stayed up late with him that night. It was God's will to take him from this miserable life around five o'clock this Monday morning, which filled me with immense sorrow. He was a brother I loved dearly for his many virtues; he was two years younger than me, a sober, prudent, and honorable gentleman. He had married into a fortune and left behind only one daughter and a grand estate at Woodcot, near Epsom. His body was examined, and a stone the size of a nutmeg was removed from his bladder. I returned home on the 8th, overwhelmed with sadness and mourning my loss.
20th March, 1670. A stranger preached at the Savoy French church; the Liturgy of the Church of England being now used altogether, as translated into French by Dr. Durell.
20th March, 1670. A stranger preached at the Savoy French church; the Liturgy of the Church of England was now being used entirely, as translated into French by Dr. Durell.
21st March, 1670. We all accompanied the corpse of my dear brother to Epsom Church, where he was decently interred in the chapel belonging to Woodcot House. A great number of friends and gentlemen of the country attended, about twenty coaches and six horses, and innumerable people.[Pg 53]
21st March, 1670. We all accompanied the body of my dear brother to Epsom Church, where he was respectfully buried in the chapel belonging to Woodcot House. A large number of friends and local gentry attended, about twenty coaches and six horses, and countless people.[Pg 53]
22d March, 1670. I went to Westminster, where in the House of Lords I saw his Majesty sit on his throne, but without his robes, all the peers sitting with their hats on; the business of the day being the divorce of my Lord Ross. Such an occasion and sight had not been seen in England since the time of Henry VIII.17
22nd March, 1670. I went to Westminster, where in the House of Lords I saw the King sitting on his throne, but without his robes, while all the peers were seated with their hats on; the matter of the day was the divorce of Lord Ross. Such an event and sight hadn’t been seen in England since the time of Henry VIII.17
5th May, 1670. To London, concerning the office of Latin Secretary to his Majesty, a place of more honor and dignity than profit, the reversion of which he had promised me.
5th May, 1670. To London, about the position of Latin Secretary to his Majesty, a role that carries more honor and prestige than financial gain, which he had promised me the chance to have.
21st May, 1670. Came to visit me Mr. Henry Saville, and Sir Charles Scarborough.
21st May, 1670. Mr. Henry Saville and Sir Charles Scarborough came to visit me.
26th May, 1670. Receiving a letter from Mr. Philip Howard, Lord Almoner to the Queen, that Monsieur Evelin, first physician to Madame (who was now come to Dover to visit the King her brother), was come to town, greatly desirous to see me; but his stay so short, that he could not come to me, I went with my brother to meet him at the Tower, where he was seeing the magazines and other curiosities, having never before been in England: we renewed our alliance and friendship, with much regret on both sides that, he being to return toward Dover that evening, we could not enjoy one another any longer. How this French family, Ivelin, of Evelin, Normandy, a very ancient and noble house is grafted into our pedigree, see in the collection brought from Paris, 1650.
26th May, 1670. I received a letter from Mr. Philip Howard, Lord Almoner to the Queen, saying that Monsieur Evelin, the chief physician to Madame (who had recently arrived in Dover to visit her brother, the King), was in town and eager to see me. However, since his visit was so brief that he couldn’t come to me, I went with my brother to meet him at the Tower, where he was exploring the magazines and other curiosities, having never been to England before. We renewed our friendship and alliance, both regretting that since he was heading back to Dover that evening, we couldn’t enjoy each other’s company longer. For details on how this French family, Ivelin, from Evelin, Normandy—a very ancient and noble house—connects to our lineage, see the collection brought from Paris in 1650.
16th June, 1670. I went with some friends to the Bear Garden, where was cock-fighting, dog-fighting, bear and bull-baiting, it being a famous day for all these butcherly sports, or rather barbarous cruelties. The bulls did[Pg 54] exceedingly well, but the Irish wolf dog exceeded, which was a tall greyhound, a stately creature indeed, who beat a cruel mastiff. One of the bulls tossed a dog full into a lady's lap as she sat in one of the boxes at a considerable height from the arena. Two poor dogs were killed, and so all ended with the ape on horseback, and I most heartily weary of the rude and dirty pastime, which I had not seen, I think, in twenty years before.
16th June, 1670. I went with some friends to the Bear Garden, where there was cockfighting, dog fighting, and bear and bull baiting. It was a famous day for all these brutal sports, or rather barbaric cruelties. The bulls did[Pg 54] exceptionally well, but the Irish wolf dog outperformed them; it was a tall greyhound, a truly impressive creature, who defeated a fierce mastiff. One of the bulls tossed a dog right into a lady's lap as she sat in a box high above the arena. Two poor dogs were killed, and it all ended with the ape on horseback, leaving me utterly tired of the rough and filthy entertainment, which I hadn’t seen, I believe, in twenty years.
18th June, 1670. Dined at Goring House, whither my Lord Arlington carried me from Whitehall with the Marquis of Worcester; there, we found Lord Sandwich, Viscount Stafford,18 the Lieutenant of the Tower, and others. After dinner, my Lord communicated to me his Majesty's desire that I would engage to write the history of our late war with the Hollanders, which I had hitherto declined; this I found was ill taken, and that I should disoblige his Majesty, who had made choice of me to do him this service, and, if I would undertake it, I should have all the assistance the Secretary's office and others could give me, with other encouragements, which I could not decently refuse.
18th June, 1670. I had dinner at Goring House, where my Lord Arlington took me from Whitehall along with the Marquis of Worcester; we found Lord Sandwich, Viscount Stafford,18 the Lieutenant of the Tower, and others there. After dinner, my Lord shared the King's wish that I would agree to write the history of our recent war with the Dutch, which I had previously declined; I realized this was taken poorly, and that I would upset the King, who had specifically chosen me for this task. If I agreed to take it on, I would receive all the support from the Secretary's office and others could provide, along with additional incentives that I could not reasonably refuse.
Lord Stafford rose from the table, in some disorder, because there were roses stuck about the fruit when the dessert was set on the table; such an antipathy, it seems, he had to them as once Lady Selenger also had, and to that degree that, as Sir Kenelm Digby tells us, laying but a rose upon her cheek when she was asleep, it raised a blister: but Sir Kenelm was a teller of strange things.
Lord Stafford got up from the table, a bit flustered, because there were roses mixed in with the fruit when dessert was served. It turns out he had a strong dislike for them, just like Lady Selenger once did. In fact, as Sir Kenelm Digby recounts, when a rose was placed on her cheek while she was asleep, it caused a blister. But then again, Sir Kenelm was known for telling unusual stories.
24th June, 1670. Came the Earl of Huntington and Countess, with the Lord Sherard, to visit us.
24th June, 1670. The Earl of Huntington and his Countess, along with Lord Sherard, came to visit us.
29th June, 1670. To London, in order to my niece's marriage, Mary, daughter to my late brother Richard, of Woodcot, with the eldest son of Mr. Attorney Montague, which was celebrated at Southampton-House chapel, after which a magnificent entertainment, feast, and dancing, dinner and supper, in the great room there; but the bride was bedded at my sister's lodging, in Drury-Lane.
29th June, 1670. I went to London for my niece Mary’s wedding. She is the daughter of my late brother Richard from Woodcot, marrying the eldest son of Mr. Attorney Montague. The ceremony took place at Southampton House chapel, followed by a lavish celebration with food, drinks, and dancing in the main hall. However, the bride stayed at my sister’s place in Drury Lane for the night.
6th July, 1670. Came to visit me Mr. Stanhope, gen[Pg 55]tleman-usher to her Majesty, and uncle to the Earl of Chesterfield, a very fine man, with my Lady Hutcheson.
6th July, 1670. Mr. Stanhope, the gentleman usher to her Majesty and uncle to the Earl of Chesterfield, came to visit me. He is a very impressive man, accompanied by my Lady Hutcheson.
19th July, 1670. I accompanied my worthy friend, that excellent man, Sir Robert Murray, with Mr. Slingsby, master of the mint, to see the latter's seat and estate at Burrow-Green in Cambridgeshire, he desiring our advice for placing a new house, which he was resolved to build. We set out in a coach and six horses with him and his lady, dined about midway at one Mr. Turner's, where we found a very noble dinner, venison, music, and a circle of country ladies and their gallants. After dinner, we proceeded, and came to Burrow-Green that night. This had been the ancient seat of the Cheekes (whose daughter Mr. Slingsby married), formerly tutor to King Henry VI. The old house large and ample, and built for ancient hospitality, ready to fall down with age, placed in a dirty hole, a stiff clay, no water, next an adjoining church-yard, and with other inconveniences. We pitched on a spot of rising ground, adorned with venerable woods, a dry and sweet prospect east and west, and fit for a park, but no running water; at a mile distance from the old house.
19th July, 1670. I accompanied my esteemed friend, the excellent Sir Robert Murray, along with Mr. Slingsby, the master of the mint, to visit Mr. Slingsby's estate at Burrow-Green in Cambridgeshire. He wanted our advice on where to place a new house he was determined to build. We set off in a coach pulled by six horses with him and his wife, and we stopped for lunch halfway at Mr. Turner's place, where we enjoyed a wonderful meal with venison, music, and a gathering of local ladies and their suitors. After lunch, we continued on and arrived at Burrow-Green that evening. This had once been the home of the Cheekes family (whose daughter Mr. Slingsby married), who had previously tutored King Henry VI. The old house was large and spacious, built for traditional hospitality, but now on the verge of collapse due to age, situated in a muddy area with stiff clay, no water nearby, next to an adjoining churchyard, and other drawbacks. We chose a raised spot with beautiful old trees, a pleasant dry view to the east and west that would be suitable for a park, though there was no running water, about a mile from the old house.
20th July, 1670. We went to dine at Lord Allington's, who had newly built a house of great cost, I believe a little less than £20,000. His architect was Mr. Pratt. It is seated in a park, with a sweet prospect and stately avenue; but water still defective; the house has also its infirmities. Went back to Mr. Slingsby's.
20th July, 1670. We went to have dinner at Lord Allington's, who had just built an expensive house, costing around £20,000. His architect was Mr. Pratt. It’s located in a park with a lovely view and grand entrance; however, the water feature is still not quite right, and the house has its flaws too. We returned to Mr. Slingsby's.
22d July, 1670. We rode out to see the great mere, or level, of recovered fen land, not far off. In the way, we met Lord Arlington going to his house in Suffolk, accompanied with Count Ogniati, the Spanish minister, and Sir Bernard Gascoigne; he was very importunate with me to go with him to Euston, being but fifteen miles distant; but, in regard of my company, I could not. So, passing through NEWMARKETNewmarket, we alighted to see his Majesty's house there, now new-building; the arches of the cellars beneath are well turned by Mr. Samuel, the architect, the rest mean enough, and hardly fit for a hunting house. Many of the rooms above had the chimneys in the angles and corners, a mode now introduced by his Majesty, which I do at no hand approve of. I predict it will spoil many noble houses and rooms, if[Pg 56] followed. It does only well in very small and trifling rooms, but takes from the state of greater. Besides, this house is placed in a dirty street, without any court or avenue, like a common one, whereas it might and ought to have been built at either end of the town, upon the very carpet where the sports are celebrated; but, it being the purchase of an old wretched house of my Lord Thomond's, his Majesty was persuaded to set it on that foundation, the most improper imaginable for a house of sport and pleasure.
22nd July, 1670. We went out to check out the great mere, or flat area of reclaimed fen land, not far away. On the way, we ran into Lord Arlington on his way to his place in Suffolk, along with Count Ogniati, the Spanish minister, and Sir Bernard Gascoigne; he was very eager for me to join him at Euston, which is only fifteen miles away, but I couldn't due to my company. So, passing through NEWMARKET, we stopped to see his Majesty's house there, which is currently under construction; the arches of the cellars below are well done by Mr. Samuel, the architect, but the rest is rather mediocre and hardly suitable for a hunting lodge. Many of the rooms above have the chimneys in the corners and angles, a style now introduced by his Majesty, which I absolutely do not approve of. I predict it will ruin many noble houses and rooms if[Pg 56] it continues. It works only in very small and trivial rooms, but detracts from the grandeur of larger ones. Besides, this house is situated on a dirty street, without any courtyard or entrance, like an ordinary one, when it really could and should have been built at either end of the town, right where the sports take place; but since it’s built on the site of an old rundown house of my Lord Thomond's, his Majesty was persuaded to set it on that foundation, which is the most unsuitable imaginable for a house of sport and pleasure.
We went to see the stables and fine horses, of which many were here kept at a vast expense, with all the art and tenderness imaginable.
We went to check out the stables and the beautiful horses, many of which were kept here at a huge cost, cared for with all the skill and kindness you could imagine.
Being arrived at some meres, we found Lord Wotton and Sir John Kiviet about their draining engines, having, it seems, undertaken to do wonders on a vast piece of marsh-ground they had hired of Sir Thomas Chicheley (master of the ordnance). They much pleased themselves with the hopes of a rich harvest of hemp and coleseed, which was the crop expected.
Upon arriving at some lakes, we found Lord Wotton and Sir John Kiviet working on their drainage equipment. It seems they had taken on the challenge of transforming a large section of marshland they rented from Sir Thomas Chicheley (the master of the ordnance). They were really excited about the prospects of a bountiful harvest of hemp and coleseed, which was the crop they were expecting.
Here we visited the engines and mills both for wind and water, draining it through two rivers or graffs, cut by hand, and capable of carrying considerable barges, which went thwart one the other, discharging the water into the sea. Such this spot had been the former winter; it was astonishing to see it now dry, and so rich that weeds grew on the banks, almost as high as a man and horse. Here, my Lord and his partner had built two or three rooms, with Flanders white bricks, very hard. One of the great engines was in the kitchen, where I saw the fish swim up, even to the very chimney hearth, by a small cut through the room, and running within a foot of the very fire.
Here we visited the engines and mills for both wind and water, draining it through two rivers or ditches, dug by hand, and capable of carrying sizable barges, which crossed each other, releasing the water into the sea. This place had been the former winter; it was amazing to see it now dry and so fertile that weeds grew on the banks, almost as tall as a man and horse. Here, my Lord and his partner had built two or three rooms with Flanders white bricks, which are very hard. One of the large engines was in the kitchen, where I saw the fish swim up, even to the very fireplace, through a small channel in the room, running within a foot of the fire.
Having, after dinner, ridden about that vast level, pestered with heat and swarms of gnats, we returned over Newmarket Heath, the way being mostly a sweet turf and down, like Salisbury Plain, the jockeys breathing their fine barbs and racers and giving them their heats.
Having ridden around that huge flat area after dinner, bothered by the heat and swarms of gnats, we returned over Newmarket Heath. The path was mostly soft grass and hills, like Salisbury Plain, with the jockeys working their fine horses and racers, pushing them for speed.
23d July, 1670. We returned from Burrow Green to London, staying some time at Audley End to see that fine palace. It is indeed a cheerful piece of Gothic building, or rather antico moderno, but placed in an obscure bottom. The cellars and galleries are very stately.[Pg 57] It has a river by it, a pretty avenue of limes, and in a park.
23rd July, 1670. We came back from Burrow Green to London, spending some time at Audley End to check out that beautiful palace. It’s truly a cheerful piece of Gothic architecture, or rather antico moderno, but located in a hidden valley. The cellars and galleries are quite impressive.[Pg 57] It has a river nearby, a lovely avenue of linden trees, and a park.
This is in Saffron Walden parish, famous for that useful plant, with which all the country is covered.
This is in the Saffron Walden parish, known for the valuable plant that covers the entire region.
Dining at Bishop Stortford, we came late to London.
Dining at Bishop Stortford, we arrived in London late.
5th August, 1670. There was sent me by a neighbor a servant maid, who, in the last month, as she was sitting before her mistress at work, felt a stroke on her arm a little above the wrist for some height, the smart of which, as if struck by another hand, caused her to hold her arm awhile till somewhat mitigated; but it put her into a kind of convulsion, or rather hysteric fit. A gentleman coming casually in, looking on her arm, found that part powdered with red crosses, set in most exact and wonderful order, neither swelled nor depressed, about this shape,
5th August, 1670. A neighbor sent me a servant girl who, last month, while sitting in front of her mistress working, felt a sudden pain on her arm just above the wrist, as if someone had struck her. The pain was so sharp that she had to hold her arm for a bit until it eased; however, it caused her to enter a sort of convulsion, or rather a hysterical fit. A gentleman who happened to come in looked at her arm and saw that area covered in red crosses, arranged in a most precise and astonishing way, neither swollen nor depressed, about this shape,
x x x x x x x x x
not seeming to be any way made by artifice, of a reddish color, not so red as blood, the skin over them smooth, the rest of the arm livid and of a mortified hue, with certain prints, as it were, of the stroke of fingers. This had happened three several times in July, at about ten days' interval, the crosses beginning to wear out, but the successive ones set in other different, yet uniform order. The maid seemed very modest, and came from London to Deptford with her mistress, to avoid the discourse and importunity of curious people. She made no gain by it, pretended no religious fancies; but seemed to be a plain, ordinary, silent, working wench, somewhat fat, short, and high-colored. She told me divers divines and physicians had seen her, but were unsatisfied; that she had taken some remedies against her fits, but they did her no good; she had never before had any fits; once since, she seemed in her sleep to hear one say to her that she should tamper no more with them, nor trouble herself with anything that happened, but put her trust in the merits of Christ only.
not appearing to be artificially made, of a reddish color, not as red as blood, the skin over them smooth, the rest of the arm bruised and discolored, with certain marks that looked like finger impressions. This had occurred three times in July, about ten days apart, the crosses starting to fade, but the new ones appearing in other different yet consistent arrangements. The maid seemed very modest and had come from London to Deptford with her mistress to avoid the chatter and pressure from curious people. She gained nothing from it, showed no signs of religious obsession; she seemed to be an ordinary, quiet, working girl, somewhat overweight, short, and ruddy. She told me various clergy and doctors had seen her but were unsatisfied; she had taken some remedies for her seizures, but they didn’t help at all; she had never had any seizures before; once since then, she seemed to hear someone say to her in her sleep that she should no longer engage with them or worry about anything that happened, but just put her trust in the merits of Christ alone.
This is the substance of what she told me, and what I saw and curiously examined. I was formerly acquainted[Pg 58] with the impostorious nuns of Loudun, in France, which made such noise among the Papists; I therefore thought this worth the notice. I remember Monsieur Monconys19 (that curious traveler and a Roman Catholic) was by no means satisfied with the stigmata of those nuns, because they were so shy of letting him scrape the letters, which were Jesus, Maria, Joseph (as I think), observing they began to scale off with it, whereas this poor wench was willing to submit to any trial; so that I profess I know not what to think of it, nor dare I pronounce it anything supernatural.
This is what she told me, and what I saw and looked into closely. I used to know about the fraudulent nuns of Loudun, France, who caused quite a stir among the Catholics; I thought this was worth mentioning. I remember Monsieur Monconys (that curious traveler and a Roman Catholic) was not at all convinced by the stigmata of those nuns because they were so reluctant to let him scrape the letters, which were Jesus, Maria, Joseph (if I remember correctly), noting that they started to peel off with it, while this poor girl was ready to undergo any test; so honestly, I don’t know what to make of it, nor do I dare to say it’s anything supernatural.
20th August, 1670. At Windsor I supped with the Duke of Monmouth; and, the next day, invited by Lord Arlington, dined with the same Duke and divers Lords. After dinner my Lord and I had a conference of more than an hour alone in his bedchamber, to engage me in the History. I showed him something that I had drawn up, to his great satisfaction, and he desired me to show it to the Treasurer.
20th August, 1670. While in Windsor, I had dinner with the Duke of Monmouth; the next day, I was invited by Lord Arlington to have lunch with the same Duke and several Lords. After lunch, my Lord and I had a private conversation for over an hour in his bedroom, where he wanted to discuss the History. I shared something I had prepared, which he liked very much, and he asked me to show it to the Treasurer.
28th August, 1670. One of the Canons preached; then followed the offering of the Knights of the Order, according to custom; first the poor Knights, in procession, then, the Canons in their formalities, the Dean and Chancellor, then his Majesty (the Sovereign), the Duke of York, Prince Rupert; and, lastly, the Earl of Oxford, being all the Knights that were then at Court.
28th August, 1670. One of the Canons preached; then came the offering from the Knights of the Order, as was customary; first the poor Knights in procession, then the Canons in their formal dress, followed by the Dean and Chancellor, then his Majesty (the Sovereign), the Duke of York, Prince Rupert; and finally, the Earl of Oxford, comprising all the Knights who were present at Court.
I dined with the Treasurer, and consulted with him what pieces I was to add; in the afternoon the King took me aside into the balcony over the terrace, extremely pleased with what had been told him I had begun, in order to his commands, and enjoining me to proceed vigorously in it. He told me he had ordered the Secretaries of State to give me all necessary assistance of papers and particulars relating to it and enjoining me to make it a LITTLE KEEN, for that the Hollanders had very unhandsomely abused him in their pictures, books, and libels.
I had dinner with the Treasurer and talked with him about which pieces I should add. In the afternoon, the King pulled me aside onto the balcony over the terrace, really pleased with what I had started in line with his instructions, and urged me to carry on with it vigorously. He mentioned that he had instructed the Secretaries of State to provide me with all the necessary papers and details related to it, and he insisted that I make it a LITTLE KEEN, since the Dutch had treated him unfairly in their pictures, books, and pamphlets.
Windsor was now going to be repaired, being exceedingly ragged and ruinous. Prince Rupert, the Con[Pg 59]stable, had begun to trim up the keep or high round Tower, and handsomely adorned his hall with furniture of arms, which was very singular, by so disposing the pikes, muskets, pistols, bandoleers, holsters, drums, back, breast, and headpieces, as was very extraordinary. Thus, those huge steep stairs ascending to it had the walls invested with this martial furniture, all new and bright, so disposing the bandoleers, holsters, and drums, as to represent festoons, and that without any confusion, trophy-like. From the hall we went into his bedchamber, and ample rooms hung with tapestry, curious and effeminate pictures, so extremely different from the other, which presented nothing but war and horror.
Windsor was now being repaired, looking very shabby and in ruins. Prince Rupert, the Constable, had started fixing up the keep, or high round Tower, and nicely decorated his hall with weapons, which was quite unique. He arranged the pikes, muskets, pistols, bandoleers, holsters, drums, back, breast, and headpieces in a remarkable way. The large, steep stairs leading up to it had walls decorated with this military gear, all new and shiny, arranged like festoons with the bandoleers, holsters, and drums clearly displayed, resembling trophies. From the hall, we went into his bedroom, which had spacious rooms draped with tapestries and delicate paintings, drastically different from the earlier rooms that showed only war and destruction.
The King passed most of his time in hunting the stag, and walking in the park, which he was now planting with rows of trees.
The King spent most of his time hunting deer and strolling in the park, which he was currently landscaping with rows of trees.
13th September, 1670. To visit Sir Richard Lashford, my kinsman, and Mr. Charles Howard, at his extraordinary garden, at Deepden.
13th September, 1670. To visit Sir Richard Lashford, my relative, and Mr. Charles Howard, at his amazing garden, at Deepden.
15th September, 1670. I went to visit Mr. Arthur Onslow, at West Clandon, a pretty dry seat on the Downs, where we dined in his great room.
15th September, 1670. I went to visit Mr. Arthur Onslow at West Clandon, a nice, dry place on the Downs, where we had dinner in his large dining room.
17th September, 1670. To visit Mr. Hussey, who, being near Wotton, lives in a sweet valley, deliciously watered.
17th September, 1670. To visit Mr. Hussey, who lives in a beautiful valley near Wotton, wonderfully filled with water.
23d September, 1670. To Albury, to see how that garden proceeded, which I found exactly done to the design and plot I had made, with the crypta through the mountain in the park, thirty perches in length. Such a Pausilippe20 is nowhere in England. The canal was now digging, and the vineyard planted.
23rd September, 1670. I went to Albury to check on the garden's progress, which turned out exactly as I designed it, complete with the underground passage through the mountain in the park, thirty perches long. There’s nothing like this Pausilippe20 in all of England. They were currently digging the canal and had planted the vineyard.
14th October, 1670. I spent the whole afternoon in private with the Treasurer who put into my hands those secret pieces and transactions concerning the Dutch war, and particularly the expedition of Bergen, in which he had himself the chief part, and gave me instructions, till the King arriving from Newmarket, we both went up into his bedchamber.
14th October, 1670. I spent the entire afternoon alone with the Treasurer, who handed me the confidential documents and dealings related to the Dutch war, especially the Bergen expedition, in which he played a leading role. He gave me instructions until the King returned from Newmarket, after which we both went up to his bedroom.
21st October, 1670. Dined with the Treasurer; and, after dinner, we were shut up together. I received other [further] advices, and ten paper books of dispatches and treaties; to return which again I gave a note under my[Pg 60] hand to Mr. Joseph Williamson, Master of the Paper office.
21st October, 1670. Had dinner with the Treasurer; and after dinner, we were alone together. I got more updates and ten notebooks of dispatches and treaties; to return them, I gave a note under my [Pg 60] hand to Mr. Joseph Williamson, Master of the Paper office.
31st October, 1670. I was this morning fifty years of age; the Lord teach me to number my days so as to apply them to his glory! Amen.
31st October, 1670. I turned fifty years old this morning; may the Lord help me to value my days and use them for His glory! Amen.
4th November, 1670. Saw the Prince of Orange, newly come to see the King, his uncle; he has a manly, courageous, wise countenance, resembling his mother and the Duke of Gloucester, both deceased.
4th November, 1670. I saw the Prince of Orange, who had just arrived to visit the King, his uncle. He has a strong, brave, and wise face, looking like both his mother and the Duke of Gloucester, who are both gone now.
I now also saw that famous beauty, but in my opinion of a childish, simple, and baby face, Mademoiselle Querouaille,21 lately Maid of Honor to Madame, and now to be so to the Queen.
I now also saw that famous beauty, but in my opinion, she had a childish, simple, and baby-like face, Mademoiselle Querouaille,21 who was recently Maid of Honor to Madame, and now would be to the Queen.
23d November, 1670. Dined with the Earl of Arlington, where was the Venetian Ambassador, of whom I now took solemn leave, now on his return. There were also Lords Howard, Wharton, Windsor, and divers other great persons.
23rd November, 1670. Had dinner with the Earl of Arlington, where the Venetian Ambassador was present, and I said my formal goodbye to him as he was leaving. Lords Howard, Wharton, Windsor, and several other important people were also there.
24th November, 1670. I dined with the Treasurer, where was the Earl of Rochester, a very profane wit.
24th November, 1670. I had dinner with the Treasurer, where the Earl of Rochester was present, a very irreverent joker.
15th December, 1670. It was the thickest and darkest fog on the Thames that was ever known in the memory of man, and I happened to be in the very midst of it. I supped with Monsieur Zulestein, late Governor to the late Prince of Orange.
15th December, 1670. It was the thickest and darkest fog on the Thames that anyone could remember, and I happened to be right in the middle of it. I had dinner with Monsieur Zulestein, the former Governor to the late Prince of Orange.
10th January, 1670-71. Mr. Bohun, my son's tutor, had been five years in my house, and now Bachelor of Laws, and Fellow of New College, went from me to Oxford to reside there, having well and faithfully performed his charge.
10th January, 1670-71. Mr. Bohun, my son's tutor, had been with us for five years, and now he is a Bachelor of Laws and a Fellow of New College. He left to go to Oxford to live there, having fulfilled his duties well and faithfully.
18th January, 1671. This day I first acquainted his Majesty with that incomparable young man, Gibbon,22 whom I had lately met with in an obscure place by mere accident, as I was walking near a poor solitary thatched house, in a field in our parish, near Sayes Court. I found him shut in; but looking in at the win[Pg 61]dow, I perceived him carving that large cartoon, or crucifix, of Tintoretto, a copy of which I had myself brought from Venice, where the original painting remains. I asked if I might enter; he opened the door civilly to me, and I saw him about such a work as for the curiosity of handling, drawing, and studious exactness, I never had before seen in all my travels. I questioned him why he worked in such an obscure and lonesome place; he told me it was that he might apply himself to his profession without interruption, and wondered not a little how I found him out. I asked if he was unwilling to be made known to some great man, for that I believed it might turn to his profit; he answered, he was yet but a beginner, but would not be sorry to sell off that piece; on demanding the price, he said £100. In good earnest, the very frame was worth the money, there being nothing in nature so tender and delicate as the flowers and festoons about it, and yet the work was very strong; in the piece was more than one hundred figures of men, etc. I found he was likewise musical, and very civil, sober, and discreet in his discourse. There was only an old woman in the house. So, desiring leave to visit him sometimes, I went away.
18th January, 1671. Today I introduced his Majesty to the remarkable young man, Gibbon,22 whom I had recently encountered by chance in a remote, humble thatched house in our parish, close to Sayes Court. I found him inside, but looking through the window, I saw him carving a large cartoon or crucifix after Tintoretto, a copy of which I had brought back from Venice, where the original painting is kept. I asked if I could come in; he politely opened the door, and I was amazed by his work, which showcased a level of skill and precise study I had never witnessed in all my travels. I inquired why he chose to work in such a secluded spot; he explained that it allowed him to focus on his craft without distractions and was curious about how I had discovered him. I asked if he would mind being introduced to someone influential, believing it could benefit him; he replied that he was still a beginner but would be open to selling his piece. When I asked the price, he said £100. Honestly, the frame alone was worth that amount, with nothing in nature as delicate as the flowers and garlands surrounding it, while the craftsmanship was robust; the artwork featured more than a hundred figures of men, among others. I also found out that he was musical and quite polite, sober, and thoughtful in his conversation. The only other person in the house was an old woman. After asking if I could visit him occasionally, I took my leave.
Of this young artist, together with my manner of finding him out, I acquainted the King, and begged that he would give me leave to bring him and his work to Whitehall, for that I would adventure my reputation with his Majesty that he had never seen anything approach it, and that he would be exceedingly pleased, and employ him. The King said he would himself go see him. This was the first notice his Majesty ever had of Mr. Gibbon.
Of this young artist, along with how I discovered him, I informed the King and asked for permission to bring him and his work to Whitehall. I was willing to risk my reputation with His Majesty, claiming he had never seen anything like it and that he would be extremely pleased and hire him. The King said he would go see him himself. This was the first time His Majesty had ever heard of Mr. Gibbon.
20th January, 1671. The King came to me in the Queen's withdrawing-room from the circle of ladies, to talk with me as to what advance I had made in the Dutch History. I dined with the Treasurer, and afterward we went to the Secretary's Office, where we conferred about divers particulars.
20th January, 1671. The King approached me in the Queen's sitting room, away from the group of ladies, to discuss my progress on the Dutch History. I had dinner with the Treasurer, and afterward, we went to the Secretary's Office, where we talked about various details.
21st January, 1671. I was directed to go to Sir George Downing, who having been a public minister in Holland, at the beginning of the war, was to give me light in some material passages.[Pg 62]
21st January, 1671. I was told to go see Sir George Downing, who, having served as a public minister in Holland at the start of the war, was supposed to help me understand some important points.[Pg 62]
This year the weather was so wet, stormy, and unseasonable, as had not been known in many years.
This year, the weather has been so wet, stormy, and out of season, unlike anything we've seen in many years.
9th February, 1671. I saw the great ball danced by the Queen and distinguished ladies at Whitehall Theater. Next day; was acted there the famous play, called, "The Siege of Granada," two days acted successively; there were indeed very glorious scenes and perspectives, the work of Mr. Streeter, who well understands it.23
9th February, 1671. I watched the grand ball performed by the Queen and esteemed ladies at Whitehall Theater. The following day, the renowned play "The Siege of Granada" was staged there for two consecutive days; it featured truly impressive scenes and perspectives, crafted by Mr. Streeter, who clearly has a talent for it.23
19th February, 1671. This day dined with me Mr. Surveyor, Dr. Christopher Wren, and Mr. Pepys, Clerk of the Acts, two extraordinary, ingenious, and knowing persons, and other friends. I carried them to see the piece of carving which I had recommended to the King.
19th February, 1671. Today I had lunch with Mr. Surveyor, Dr. Christopher Wren, and Mr. Pepys, Clerk of the Acts, two remarkable, clever, and knowledgeable individuals, along with some other friends. I took them to see the carving that I had suggested to the King.
25th February, 1671. Came to visit me one of the Lords Commissioners of Scotland for the Union.
25th February, 1671. One of the Lords Commissioners of Scotland for the Union came to visit me.
28th February, 1671. The Treasurer acquainted me that his Majesty was graciously pleased to nominate me one of the Council of Foreign Plantations, and give me a salary of £500 per annum, to encourage me.
28th February, 1671. The Treasurer informed me that the King was kindly pleased to appoint me as a member of the Council of Foreign Plantations and offer me a salary of £500 a year to encourage me.
29th February, 1671. I went to thank the Treasurer, who was my great friend and loved me; I dined with him and much company, and went thence to my Lord Arlington, Secretary of State, in whose favor I likewise was upon many occasions, though I cultivated neither of their friendships by any mean submissions. I kissed his Majesty's hand, on his making me one of the new-established Council.
29th February, 1671. I went to thank the Treasurer, who was a good friend of mine and cared for me; I had dinner with him and quite a few others, and then I went to see my Lord Arlington, the Secretary of State, who I had also supported on many occasions, although I didn’t pursue either of their friendships through any kind of flattery. I kissed the King’s hand when he appointed me to the newly established Council.
1st March, 1671. I caused Mr. Gibbon to bring to Whitehall his excellent piece of carving, where being come, I advertised his Majesty, who asked me where it was; I told him in Sir Richard Browne's (my father-in-law) chamber, and that if it pleased his Majesty to appoint whither it should be brought, being large and though of wood, heavy, I would take care for it. "No," says the King, "show me the way, I'll go to Sir Richard's chamber," which he immediately did, walking along the entries after me; as far as the ewry, till he came up into the room, where I also lay. No sooner was he entered and cast his eyes on the work, but he was astonished at the curiosity of it; and having considered it a long time, and discoursed with Mr. Gibbon, whom I brought to kiss his hand, he commanded it should be[Pg 63] immediately carried to the Queen's side to show her. It was carried up into her bedchamber, where she and the King looked on and admired it again; the King, being called away, left us with the Queen, believing she would have bought it, it being a crucifix; but, when his Majesty was gone, a French peddling woman, one Madame de Boord, who used to bring petticoats and fans, and baubles, out of France to the ladies, began to find fault with several things in the work, which she understood no more than an ass, or a monkey, so as in a kind of indignation, I caused the person who brought it to carry it back to the chamber, finding the Queen so much governed by an ignorant Frenchwoman, and this incomparable artist had his labor only for his pains, which not a little displeased me; and he was fain to send it down to his cottage again; he not long after sold it for £80, though well worth £100, without the frame, to Sir George Viner.
1st March, 1671. I had Mr. Gibbon bring his amazing carving to Whitehall. When he arrived, I informed His Majesty, who asked me where it was. I told him it was in Sir Richard Browne's (my father-in-law) room and that if it pleased His Majesty to decide where it should be brought, I would take care of it since it was large and heavy, even though it was made of wood. "No," the King said, "show me the way; I'll go to Sir Richard's room," and he immediately followed me through the halls until we reached the room where I was also lying. As soon as he entered and saw the work, he was astonished by its beauty. After considering it for a long time and talking with Mr. Gibbon, whom I brought to kiss his hand, he ordered it to be[Pg 63] immediately taken to the Queen to show her. It was carried up to her bedroom, where she and the King admired it again. When the King was called away, he left us with the Queen, believing she would want to buy it since it was a crucifix. However, once His Majesty was gone, a French saleswoman, Madame de Boord, who used to bring petticoats, fans, and trinkets from France for the ladies, started to criticize several aspects of the work, yet she understood it no better than a donkey or a monkey. Out of frustration, I had the person who brought it take it back to the room, realizing that the Queen was so swayed by an ignorant French woman, and this incredible artist had his efforts wasted, which displeased me greatly. He eventually had to send it back to his workshop, and not long after, he sold it for £80, even though it was worth £100 without the frame, to Sir George Viner.
His Majesty's Surveyor, Mr. Wren, faithfully promised me to employ him.24 I having also bespoke his Majesty for his work at Windsor, which my friend, Mr. May, the architect there, was going to alter, and repair universally; for, on the next day, I had a fair opportunity of talking to his Majesty about it, in the lobby next the Queen's side, where I presented him with some sheets of my history. I thence walked with him through St. James's Park to the garden, where I both saw and heard a very familiar discourse between ... and Mrs. Nelly,25 as they called an impudent comedian, she looking out of her garden on a terrace at the top of the wall, and ... standing on the green walk under it. I was heartily sorry at this scene. Thence the King walked to the Duchess of Cleveland, another lady of pleasure, and curse of our nation.
His Majesty's Surveyor, Mr. Wren, promised me he would hire him.24 I also spoke to His Majesty about his work at Windsor, which my friend, Mr. May, the architect there, was about to modify and repair entirely; because the next day, I had a good chance to talk to His Majesty about it in the lobby near the Queen's side, where I gave him some pages of my history. After that, I walked with him through St. James's Park to the garden, where I witnessed a very casual conversation between ... and Mrs. Nelly,25 whom they called a bold actress, as she leaned over her garden on a terrace at the top of the wall, and ... standing on the green path beneath it. I was truly saddened by this scene. After that, the King went to the Duchess of Cleveland, another woman of ill-repute, causing trouble in our nation.
5th March, 1671. I dined at Greenwich, to take leave of Sir Thomas Linch, going Governor of Jamaica.
5th March, 1671. I had dinner at Greenwich to say goodbye to Sir Thomas Linch, the new Governor of Jamaica.
10th March, 1671. To London, about passing my patent as one of the standing Council for Plantations, a considerable honor, the others in the Council being chiefly noblemen and officers of state.[Pg 64]
10th March, 1671. To London, regarding the approval of my patent as a permanent member of the Council for Plantations, which is a significant honor, as most of the other Council members are mainly nobles and state officials.[Pg 64]

NELL GWYNNE
Nell Gwyn
Photogravure after Sir Peter Lely
Photogravure by Sir Peter Lely
2d April, 1671. To Sir Thomas Clifford, the Treasurer, to condole with him on the loss of his eldest son, who died at Florence.
2nd April, 1671. To Sir Thomas Clifford, the Treasurer, to express my condolences for the loss of his eldest son, who passed away in Florence.
2d May, 1671. The French King, being now with a great army of 28,000 men about Dunkirk, divers of the grandees of that Court, and a vast number of gentlemen and cadets, in fantastical habits, came flocking over to see our Court and compliment his Majesty. I was present, when they first were conducted into the Queen's withdrawing-room, where saluted their Majesties the Dukes of Guise, Longueville, and many others of the first rank.
2nd May, 1671. The French King, now with a large army of 28,000 men around Dunkirk, had several high-ranking officials from his court, along with a huge number of gentlemen and young nobles in extravagant outfits, coming over to visit our court and pay their respects to his Majesty. I was there when they were first led into the Queen's private sitting room, where they greeted their Majesties, the Dukes of Guise, Longueville, and many other top-ranking nobles.
10th May, 1671. Dined at Mr. Treasurer's,26 in company with Monsieur De Grammont and several French noblemen, and one Blood, that impudent, bold fellow who had not long before attempted to steal the imperial crown itself out of the Tower, pretending only curiosity of seeing the regalia there, when, stabbing the keeper, though not mortally, he boldly went away with it through all the guards, taken only by the accident of his horse falling down. How he came to be pardoned, and even received into favor, not only after this, but several other exploits almost as daring both in Ireland and here, I could never come to understand. Some believed he became a spy of several parties, being well with the sectaries and enthusiasts, and did his Majesty services that way, which none alive could do so well as he; but it was certainly the boldest attempt, so the only treason of this sort that was ever pardoned. This man had not only a daring but a villanous, unmerciful look, a false countenance, but very well-spoken and dangerously insinuating.
10th May, 1671. Had dinner at Mr. Treasurer's,26 with Monsieur De Grammont and several French noblemen, along with a guy named Blood, that brazen, audacious fellow who had recently tried to steal the imperial crown from the Tower. He pretended it was just curiosity to see the regalia, but after stabbing the guard—though not fatally—he boldly made off with it, getting past all the guards, only to be caught when his horse fell. I could never figure out how he got pardoned and even accepted back into favor, not just after this incident but after several other equally daring exploits in Ireland and here. Some thought he became a spy for various groups, getting close to the sectarians and enthusiasts, and did great service for His Majesty in that way, which no one else could do as well as he did. But it was definitely the boldest attempt—the only treason of this kind ever pardoned. This man had not only a daring but a vile, merciless look, a deceitful face, but he was very eloquent and dangerously charming.
11th May, 1671. I went to Eltham, to sit as one of the commissioners about the subsidy now given by Parliament to his Majesty.
11th May, 1671. I went to Eltham to serve as one of the commissioners regarding the subsidy currently provided by Parliament to His Majesty.
17th May, 1671. Dined at Mr. Treasurer's [Sir[Pg 65] Thomas Clifford] with the Earl of Arlington, Carlingford, Lord Arundel of Wardour, Lord Almoner to the Queen, a French Count and two abbots, with several more of French nobility; and now by something I had lately observed of Mr. Treasurer's conversation on occasion, I suspected him a little warping to Rome.
17th May, 1671. Had dinner at Mr. Treasurer's [Sir[Pg 65] Thomas Clifford] with the Earl of Arlington, Carlingford, Lord Arundel of Wardour, Lord Almoner to the Queen, a French Count, two abbots, and several other members of French nobility; and from something I had recently noticed in Mr. Treasurer's conversation, I suspected he was slightly leaning toward Rome.
25th May, 1671. I dined at a feast made for me and my wife by the Trinity Company, for our passing a fine of the land which Sir R. Browne, my wife's father, freely gave to found and build their college, or almshouses on, at Deptford, it being my wife's after her father's decease. It was a good and charitable work and gift, but would have been better bestowed on the poor of that parish, than on the seamen's widows, the Trinity Company being very rich, and the rest of the poor of the parish exceedingly indigent.
25th May, 1671. I had a dinner hosted by the Trinity Company for my wife and me, in celebration of the fine on the land that Sir R. Browne, my wife's father, generously donated to establish and build their college or almshouses at Deptford, which will belong to my wife after her father passes away. It was a good and charitable act, but it would have been better allocated to the poor in that parish rather than the widows of seamen, since the Trinity Company is quite wealthy, while the other poor people in the parish are in dire need.
26th May, 1671. The Earl of Bristol's house in Queen's Street [Lincoln's Inn Fields] was taken for the Commissioners of Trade and Plantations, and furnished with rich hangings of the King's. It consisted of seven rooms on a floor, with a long gallery, gardens, etc. This day we met the Duke of Buckingham, Earl of Lauderdale, Lord Culpeper, Sir George Carteret, Vice-Chamberlain, and myself, had the oaths given us by the Earl of Sandwich, our President. It was to advise and counsel his Majesty, to the best of our abilities, for the well-governing of his Foreign Plantations, etc., the form very little differing from that given to the Privy Council. We then took our places at the Board in the Council-Chamber, a very large room furnished with atlases, maps, charts, globes, etc. Then came the Lord Keeper, Sir Orlando Bridgeman, Earl of Arlington, Secretary of State, Lord Ashley, Mr. Treasurer, Sir John Trevor, the other Secretary, Sir John Duncomb, Lord Allington, Mr. Grey, son to the Lord Grey, Mr. Henry Broncher, Sir Humphrey Winch, Sir John Finch, Mr. Waller, and Colonel Titus, of the bedchamber, with Mr. Slingsby, Secretary to the Council, and two Clerks of the Council, who had all been sworn some days before. Being all set, our Patent was read, and then the additional Patent, in which was recited this new establishment; then, was delivered to each a copy of the Patent, and of instructions: after which, we proceeded to business.[Pg 66]
26th May, 1671. The Earl of Bristol's house on Queen's Street [Lincoln's Inn Fields] was designated for the Commissioners of Trade and Plantations and was decorated with the King's expensive hangings. It had seven rooms on one floor, along with a long gallery, gardens, and more. On this day, we met with the Duke of Buckingham, the Earl of Lauderdale, Lord Culpeper, Sir George Carteret, the Vice-Chamberlain, and myself. The Earl of Sandwich, our President, administered the oaths to us. Our role was to advise and counsel His Majesty to the best of our abilities for the effective governance of his Foreign Plantations, with the process being very similar to that for the Privy Council. We then took our places at the Board in the Council Chamber, which was a very large room filled with atlases, maps, charts, globes, and more. Then arrived the Lord Keeper, Sir Orlando Bridgeman, the Earl of Arlington, Secretary of State, Lord Ashley, Mr. Treasurer, Sir John Trevor, the other Secretary, Sir John Duncomb, Lord Allington, Mr. Grey, son of Lord Grey, Mr. Henry Broncher, Sir Humphrey Winch, Sir John Finch, Mr. Waller, and Colonel Titus from the bedchamber, along with Mr. Slingsby, Secretary to the Council, and two Clerks of the Council, who had all taken their oaths a few days prior. Once we were settled, our Patent was read, followed by the additional Patent outlining this new establishment; then, each person received a copy of the Patent and the instructions: after which, we began our work.[Pg 66]
The first thing we did was, to settle the form of a circular letter to the Governors of all his Majesty's Plantations and Territories in the West Indies and Islands thereof, to give them notice to whom they should apply themselves on all occasions, and to render us an account of their present state and government; but, what we most insisted on was, to know the condition of New England, which appearing to be very independent as to their regard to Old England, or his Majesty, rich and strong as they now were, there were great debates in what style to write to them; for the condition of that Colony was such, that they were able to contest with all other Plantations about them, and there was fear of their breaking from all dependence on this nation; his Majesty, therefore, commended this affair more expressly. We, therefore, thought fit, in the first place, to acquaint ourselves as well as we could of the state of that place, by some whom we heard of that were newly come from thence, and to be informed of their present posture and condition; some of our Council were for sending them a menacing letter, which those who better understood the peevish and touchy humor of that Colony, were utterly against.
The first thing we did was draft a circular letter to the Governors of all of His Majesty's Plantations and Territories in the West Indies and surrounding islands. This letter was meant to inform them whom they should approach for any matters and to provide us with an update on their current state and governance. However, what we focused on most was understanding the situation in New England. They seemed very independent regarding Old England and His Majesty, and given their wealth and strength, there were significant discussions about how to address them in writing. The condition of that Colony allowed them to stand against all other nearby Plantations, raising concerns about their breaking away from any dependence on this nation. His Majesty therefore emphasized the importance of this matter. We decided it was best to learn as much as we could about the situation there from those who had recently returned, so we could understand their current status and condition. Some members of our Council suggested sending them a threatening letter, but those who were more familiar with the sensitive and irritable nature of that Colony strongly opposed this idea.
A letter was then read from Sir Thomas Modiford, Governor of Jamaica; and then the Council broke up.
A letter was then read from Sir Thomas Modiford, Governor of Jamaica; and then the Council adjourned.
Having brought an action against one Cocke, for money which he had received for me, it had been referred to an arbitration by the recommendation of that excellent good man, the Chief-Justice Hale,27 but, this not succeeding, I went to advise with that famous lawyer, Mr. Jones, of Gray's Inn, and, 27th of May, had a trial before Lord Chief Justice Hale; and, after the lawyers had wrangled sufficiently, it was referred to a new arbitration. This was the very first suit at law that ever I had with any creature, and oh, that it might be the last!
Having filed a lawsuit against a guy named Cocke for money he received on my behalf, it was recommended for arbitration by that truly good man, Chief Justice Hale,27 but when that didn’t work out, I sought advice from the well-known lawyer, Mr. Jones, of Gray's Inn. On May 27th, I had a trial before Lord Chief Justice Hale, and after the lawyers bickered enough, it was sent to another arbitration. This was the very first legal case I’ve ever had with anyone, and I hope it’s the last!
1st June, 1671. An installation at Windsor.
1st June, 1671. An installation at Windsor.
6th June, 1671. I went to Council, where was produced a most exact and ample information of the state[Pg 67] of Jamaica, and of the best expedients as to New England, on which there was a long debate; but at length it was concluded that, if any, it should be only a conciliating paper at first, or civil letter, till we had better information of the present face of things, since we understood they were a people almost upon the very brink of renouncing any dependence on the Crown.
6th June, 1671. I attended the Council, where we reviewed a very detailed and comprehensive report on the situation in Jamaica, as well as the best strategies for New England. There was a long discussion, but ultimately, it was decided that, if we were to send anything, it should just be a conciliatory letter at first until we had a clearer understanding of the current situation, as we learned they were nearly on the verge of breaking away from the Crown.
19th June, 1671. To a splendid dinner at the great room in Deptford Trinity House, Sir Thomas Allen chosen Master, and succeeding the Earl of Craven.
19th June, 1671. To an extravagant dinner in the grand room at Deptford Trinity House, Sir Thomas Allen was selected as Master, succeeding the Earl of Craven.
20th June, 1671. To carry Colonel Middleton to Whitehall, to my Lord Sandwich, our President, for some information which he was able to give of the state of the Colony in New England.
20th June, 1671. To take Colonel Middleton to Whitehall, to my Lord Sandwich, our President, for some information that he could provide about the situation of the Colony in New England.
21st June, 1671. To Council again, when one Colonel Cartwright, a Nottinghamshire man, (formerly in commission with Colonel Nicholls) gave us a considerable relation of that country; on which the Council concluded that in the first place a letter of amnesty should be dispatched.
21st June, 1671. To Council again, when Colonel Cartwright, a man from Nottinghamshire (formerly in service with Colonel Nicholls), gave us a detailed report about that area; based on this, the Council decided that the first step should be to send out a letter of amnesty.
24th June, 1671. Constantine Huygens, Signor of Zuylichem, that excellent learned man, poet, and musician, now near eighty years of age, a vigorous, brisk man,28 came to take leave of me before his return into Holland with the Prince, whose Secretary he was.
24th June, 1671. Constantine Huygens, Lord of Zuylichem, that distinguished scholar, poet, and musician, now close to eighty years old, still a vigorous and lively man,28 came to say goodbye to me before his return to Holland with the Prince, of whom he was Secretary.
26th June, 1671. To Council, where Lord Arlington acquainted us that it was his Majesty's proposal we should, every one of us, contribute £20 toward building a Council chamber and conveniences somewhere in Whitehall, that his Majesty might come and sit among us, and hear our debates; the money we laid out to be reimbursed out of the contingent moneys already set apart for us, viz, £1,000 yearly. To this we unanimously consented. There came an uncertain bruit from Barbadoes of some disorder there. On my return home I[Pg 68] stepped in at the theater to see the new machines for the intended scenes, which were indeed very costly and magnificent.
26th June, 1671. To Council, where Lord Arlington informed us that it was the King's suggestion we each contribute £20 to build a Council chamber and facilities somewhere in Whitehall, so that the King can join us and listen to our discussions; the money we spent would be reimbursed from the funds already allocated for us, specifically £1,000 per year. We all agreed to this. There were some uncertain reports from Barbados about some unrest there. On my way home, I stepped into the theater to check out the new machinery for the planned scenes, which were indeed very expensive and impressive.
29th June, 1671. To Council, where were letters from Sir Thomas Modiford, of the expedition and exploit of Colonel Morgan, and others of Jamaica, on the Spanish Continent at Panama.
29th June, 1671. To Council, where there were letters from Sir Thomas Modiford regarding the expedition and activities of Colonel Morgan and others from Jamaica on the Spanish mainland at Panama.
4th July, 1671. To Council, where we drew up and agreed to a letter to be sent to New England, and made some proposal to Mr. Gorges, for his interest in a plantation there.
4th July, 1671. To Council, where we wrote and agreed on a letter to be sent to New England, and made some proposals to Mr. Gorges regarding his interest in a plantation there.
24th July, 1671. To Council. Mr. Surveyor brought us a plot for the building of our Council chamber, to be erected at the end of the Privy garden, in Whitehall.
24th July, 1671. To Council. Mr. Surveyor brought us a plan for the construction of our Council chamber, to be built at the end of the Privy garden, in Whitehall.
3d August, 1671. A full appearance at the Council. The matter in debate was, whether we should send a deputy to New England, requiring them of the Massachusetts to restore such to their limits and respective possessions, as had petitioned the Council; this to be the open commission only; but, in truth, with secret instructions to inform us of the condition of those Colonies, and whether they were of such power, as to be able to resist his Majesty and declare for themselves as independent of the Crown, which we were told, and which of late years made them refractory. Colonel Middleton, being called in, assured us they might be curbed by a few of his Majesty's first-rate frigates, to spoil their trade with the islands; but, though my Lord President was not satisfied, the rest were, and we did resolve to advise his Majesty to send Commissioners with a formal commission for adjusting boundaries, etc., with some other instructions.
3rd August, 1671. A full meeting at the Council. The discussion was about whether we should send a representative to New England, asking the Massachusetts to restore those who had petitioned the Council to their rightful limits and possessions; this would be the official commission only; however, secretly, it would include instructions to update us on the status of those Colonies and if they were strong enough to resist his Majesty and declare independence from the Crown, which we had been informed about and which had recently made them defiant. Colonel Middleton, upon being called in, assured us that they could be controlled by a few of his Majesty's top frigates, to disrupt their trade with the islands; but, although my Lord President was not convinced, the others agreed, and we decided to advise his Majesty to send Commissioners with a formal commission for settling boundaries, etc., along with some other instructions.
19th August, 1671. To Council. The letters of Sir Thomas Modiford were read, giving relation of the exploit at Panama, which was very brave; they took, burned, and pillaged the town of vast treasures, but the best of the booty had been shipped off, and lay at anchor in the South Sea, so that, after our men had ranged the country sixty miles about, they went back to Nombre de Dios, and embarked for Jamaica. Such an action had not been done since the famous Drake.
19th August, 1671. To Council. The letters from Sir Thomas Modiford were read, detailing the bold mission at Panama. They captured, burned, and looted the town filled with great treasures, but most of the valuable goods had already been shipped out and were anchored in the South Sea. After our men explored the surrounding area for sixty miles, they returned to Nombre de Dios and boarded a ship for Jamaica. No one had accomplished such a feat since the legendary Drake.
I dined at the Hamburg Resident's, and, after dinner, went to the christening of Sir Samuel Tuke's son,[Pg 69] Charles, at Somerset House, by a Popish priest, and many odd ceremonies. The godfathers were the King, and Lord Arundel of Wardour, and godmother, the Countess of Huntingdon.
I had dinner at the Hamburg Residence, and after that, I went to the christening of Sir Samuel Tuke's son, [Pg 69] Charles, at Somerset House, performed by a Catholic priest, with a lot of unusual ceremonies. The godfathers were the King and Lord Arundel of Wardour, and the godmother was the Countess of Huntingdon.
29th August, 1671. To London, with some more papers of my progress in the Dutch War, delivered to the Treasurer.
29th August, 1671. To London, with additional papers regarding my progress in the Dutch War, submitted to the Treasurer.
1st September, 1671. Dined with the Treasurer, in company with my Lord Arlington, Halifax, and Sir Thomas Strickland; and next day, went home, being the anniversary of the late dreadful fire of London.
1st September, 1671. Had dinner with the Treasurer, along with my Lord Arlington, Halifax, and Sir Thomas Strickland; and the next day, went home, marking the anniversary of the terrible fire in London.
13th September, 1671. This night fell a dreadful tempest.
13th September, 1671. A terrible storm hit tonight.
15th September, 1671. In the afternoon at Council, where letters were read from Sir Charles Wheeler, concerning his resigning his government of St. Christopher's.
15th September, 1671. In the afternoon at Council, where letters were read from Sir Charles Wheeler about his resignation as governor of St. Christopher's.
21st September, 1671. I dined in the city, at the fraternity feast in Ironmongers' Hall, where the four stewards chose their successors for the next year, with a solemn procession, garlands about their heads, and music playing before them; so, coming up to the upper tables where the gentlemen sat, they drank to the new stewards; and so we parted.
21st September, 1671. I had dinner in the city at the fraternity feast in Ironmongers' Hall, where the four stewards selected their successors for the following year with a formal procession, garlands on their heads, and music playing ahead of them; then, approaching the upper tables where the gentlemen were seated, they toasted the new stewards; and then we all went our separate ways.
22d September, 1671. I dined at the Treasurer's, where I had discourse with Sir Henry Jones (now come over to raise a regiment of horse), concerning the French conquests in Lorraine; he told me the King sold all things to the soldiers, even to a handful of hay.
22nd September, 1671. I had lunch at the Treasurer's, where I talked with Sir Henry Jones (who has recently come over to raise a cavalry regiment) about the French conquests in Lorraine; he told me that the King sold everything to the soldiers, even a handful of hay.
Lord Sunderland was now nominated Ambassador to Spain.
Lord Sunderland was now appointed Ambassador to Spain.
After dinner, the Treasurer carried me to Lincoln's Inn, to one of the Parliament Clerks, to obtain of him, that I might carry home and peruse, some of the Journals, which were, accordingly, delivered to me to examine about the late Dutch War. Returning home, I went on shore to see the Custom House, now newly rebuilt since the dreadful conflagration.
After dinner, the Treasurer took me to Lincoln's Inn, to one of the Parliament Clerks, to get some of the Journals that I could take home and read, which he gave me to look over regarding the recent Dutch War. On my way home, I stopped by the Custom House, which has just been rebuilt after the terrible fire.
9th and 10th October, 1671. I went, after evening service, to London, in order to a journey of refreshment with Mr. Treasurer, to Newmarket, where the King then was, in his coach with six brave horses, which we changed thrice, first, at Bishop-Stortford, and last, at Chesterford; so, by night, we got to Newmarket, where Mr. Henry[Pg 70] Jermain (nephew to the Earl of St. Alban) lodged me very civilly. We proceeded immediately to Court, the King and all the English gallants being there at their autumnal sports. Supped at the Lord Chamberlain's; and, the next day, after dinner, I was on the heath, where I saw the great match run between Woodcock and Flatfoot, belonging to the King, and to Mr. Eliot, of the bedchamber, many thousands being spectators; a more signal race had not been run for many years.
9th and 10th October, 1671. After evening service, I traveled to London for a trip of relaxation with Mr. Treasurer to Newmarket, where the King was at the time. We rode in a coach pulled by six impressive horses, which we changed three times—first at Bishop-Stortford, and finally at Chesterford. By night, we arrived in Newmarket, where Mr. Henry Jermain (nephew of the Earl of St. Alban) kindly hosted me. We headed straight to Court, where the King and all the English gentlemen were engaged in their autumn sports. I had dinner at the Lord Chamberlain's, and the next day, after lunch, I went to the heath, where I watched the big race between Woodcock and Flatfoot, horses belonging to the King and Mr. Eliot of the bedchamber, respectively, with thousands of spectators present; it was the most notable race in years.
This over, I went that night with Mr. Treasurer to Euston, a palace of Lord Arlington's, where we found Monsieur Colbert (the French Ambassador), and the famous new French Maid of Honor, Mademoiselle Querouaille, now coming to be in great favor with the King. Here was also the Countess of Sunderland, and several lords and ladies, who lodged in the house.
This done, I went that night with Mr. Treasurer to Euston, a palace of Lord Arlington's, where we found Monsieur Colbert (the French Ambassador), and the well-known new French Maid of Honor, Mademoiselle Querouaille, who was now becoming very favored by the King. There was also the Countess of Sunderland, along with several lords and ladies who were staying in the house.
During my stay here with Lord Arlington, near a fortnight, his Majesty came almost every second day with the Duke, who commonly returned to Newmarket, but the King often lay here, during which time I had twice the honor to sit at dinner with him, with all freedom. It was universally reported that the fair lady ——, was bedded one of these nights, and the stocking flung, after the manner of a married bride; I acknowledge she was for the most part in her undress all day, and that there was fondness and toying with that young wanton; nay, it was said, I was at the former ceremony; but it is utterly false; I neither saw nor heard of any such thing while I was there, though I had been in her chamber, and all over that apartment late enough, and was myself observing all passages with much curiosity. However, it was with confidence believed she was first made a Miss, as they called these unhappy creatures, with solemnity at this time.
During my time here with Lord Arlington, for almost two weeks, the King visited almost every other day with the Duke, who usually went back to Newmarket, but the King often stayed here. During that time, I had the honor of sitting down to dinner with him twice, completely at ease. It was widely rumored that the beautiful lady —— spent one of those nights in bed with someone, and that a stocking was tossed, like a bride's tradition; I admit she mostly stayed in her nightclothes all day, and there was some affection and playful behavior with that young flirt; in fact, it was said I witnessed the previous ceremony, but that is entirely false; I neither saw nor heard of anything like that while I was there, even though I had been in her room, and had looked around that area late enough, and I was myself attentively observing everything. Nevertheless, it was confidently believed that she was first made a Miss, as they called these unfortunate women, with a lot of seriousness during this time.
On Sunday, a young Cambridge divine preached an excellent sermon in the chapel, the King and the Duke of York being present.
On Sunday, a young pastor from Cambridge delivered a great sermon in the chapel, with the King and the Duke of York in attendance.
16th October, 1671. Came all the great men from Newmarket, and other parts both of Suffolk and Norfolk, to make their court, the whole house filled from one end to the other with lords, ladies, and gallants; there was such a furnished table, as I had seldom seen, nor anything more splendid and free, so that for fifteen days[Pg 71] there were entertained at least 200 people, and half as many horses, besides servants and guards, at infinite expense.
16th October, 1671. All the important people came from Newmarket and other areas of Suffolk and Norfolk to pay their respects. The entire house was packed with lords, ladies, and gentlemen; the banquet was lavish, something I had rarely witnessed, and it was extraordinarily magnificent and welcoming. For fifteen days[Pg 71], at least 200 guests were entertained, along with half as many horses, in addition to servants and guards, all at a tremendous cost.
In the morning, we went hunting and hawking; in the afternoon, till almost morning, to cards and dice, yet I must say without noise, swearing, quarrel, or confusion of any sort. I, who was no gamester, had often discourse with the French Ambassador, Colbert, and went sometimes abroad on horseback with the ladies to take the air, and now and then to hunting; thus idly passing the time, but not without more often recess to my pretty apartment, where I was quite out of all this hurry, and had leisure when I would, to converse with books, for there is no man more hospitably easy to be withal than my Lord Arlington, of whose particular friendship and kindness I had ever a more than ordinary share. His house is a very noble pile, consisting of four pavilions after the French, beside a body of a large house, and, though not built altogether, but formed of additions to an old house (purchased by his Lordship of one Sir T. Rookwood) yet with a vast expense made not only capable and roomsome, but very magnificent and commodious, as well within as without, nor less splendidly furnished. The staircase is very elegant, the garden handsome, the canal beautiful, but the soil dry, barren, and miserably sandy, which flies in drifts as the wind sits. Here my Lord was pleased to advise with me about ordering his plantations of firs, elms, limes, etc., up his park, and in all other places and avenues. I persuaded him to bring his park so near as to comprehend his house within it; which he resolved upon, it being now near a mile to it. The water furnishing the fountains, is raised by a pretty engine, or very slight plain wheels, which likewise serve to grind his corn, from a small cascade of the canal, the invention of Sir Samuel Morland. In my Lord's house, and especially above the staircase, in the great hall and some of the chambers and rooms of state, are paintings in fresco by Signor Verrio, being the first work which he did in England.
In the morning, we went hunting and hawking; in the afternoon, until almost morning, we played cards and dice, but I have to say it was done quietly, without swearing, fights, or any confusion. I, who didn't gamble much, often had conversations with the French Ambassador, Colbert, and sometimes rode out on horseback with the ladies for fresh air, and occasionally went hunting. I was idly passing the time, but more often than not, I would retreat to my lovely apartment, where I could escape all the hustle and bustle and enjoy some leisure time to read books. My Lord Arlington was always pleasant to be around, and I shared a special friendship and kindness with him that was more than ordinary. His house is a grand structure, featuring four pavilions in the French style, along with a large main building. Even though it wasn't all built at once, but rather added onto an older house (which his Lordship bought from one Sir T. Rookwood), it has been transformed with great expense to be spacious and magnificent, both inside and out, and is also lavishly furnished. The staircase is very elegant, the garden is lovely, and the canal is beautiful, but the land is dry, barren, and terribly sandy, which gets blown around when the wind picks up. Here, my Lord consulted with me about how to arrange his fir, elm, and lime tree plantations throughout his park and in all other areas and pathways. I encouraged him to bring the park closer so that it would include his house, which he agreed to do, as it was currently about a mile away. The water for the fountains is lifted by a clever device, or very simple wheels, which also grind his grain from a small cascade of the canal, invented by Sir Samuel Morland. In my Lord's house, particularly above the staircase in the grand hall and some of the state rooms, there are fresco paintings by Signor Verrio, which are the first work he completed in England.
17th October, 1671. My Lord Henry Howard coming this night to visit my Lord Chamberlain, and staying a day, would needs have me go with him to Norwich, promising to convey me back, after a day or two; this, as I[Pg 72] could not refuse, I was not hard to be pursuaded to, having a desire to see that famous scholar and physician, Dr. T. Browne, author of the "Religio Medici" and "Vulgar Errors," now lately knighted. Thither, then, went my Lord and I alone, in his flying chariot with six horses; and by the way, discoursing with me of several of his concerns, he acquainted me of his going to marry his eldest son to one of the King's natural daughters, by the Duchess of Cleveland; by which he reckoned he should come into mighty favor. He also told me that, though he kept that idle creature, Mrs. B——, and would leave £200 a year to the son he had by her, he would never marry her, and that the King himself had cautioned him against it. All the world knows how he kept his promise, and I was sorry at heart to hear what now he confessed to me; and that a person and a family which I so much honored for the sake of that noble and illustrious friend of mine, his grandfather, should dishonor and pollute them both with those base and vicious courses he of late had taken since the death of Sir Samuel Tuke, and that of his own virtuous lady (my Lady Anne Somerset, sister to the Marquis); who, while they lived, preserved this gentleman by their example and advice from those many extravagances that impaired both his fortune and reputation.
17th October, 1671. My Lord Henry Howard came to visit my Lord Chamberlain tonight and decided to stay for a day. He insisted that I go with him to Norwich, promising to bring me back after a day or two. I couldn’t refuse, and I was eager to see the famous scholar and physician, Dr. T. Browne, the author of "Religio Medici" and "Vulgar Errors," who was recently knighted. So, my Lord and I set off alone in his fast chariot pulled by six horses. During the ride, he talked to me about various matters and mentioned that he was planning to marry his eldest son to one of the King’s illegitimate daughters by the Duchess of Cleveland, thinking this would bring him great favor. He also told me that, despite keeping the idle woman Mrs. B—— and planning to leave £200 a year to the son he had with her, he would never marry her, as the King himself had advised him against it. Everyone knows how he kept that promise, and I felt a deep sadness hearing what he now confessed to me; that someone and a family I held in high regard because of my noble and illustrious friend, his grandfather, should be dishonored and corrupted by the shameful and immoral choices he had made since the deaths of Sir Samuel Tuke and his virtuous wife, Lady Anne Somerset, sister to the Marquis. While they were alive, their example and advice had kept this gentleman from the many excesses that damaged both his wealth and reputation.
Being come to the Ducal palace, my Lord made very much of me; but I had little rest, so exceedingly desirous he was to show me the contrivance he had made for the entertainment of their Majesties, and the whole Court not long before, and which, though much of it was but temporary, apparently framed of boards only, was yet standing. As to the palace, it is an old wretched building, and that part of it newly built of brick, is very ill understood; so as I was of the opinion it had been much better to have demolished all, and set it up in a better place, than to proceed any further; for it stands in the very market-place, and, though near a river, yet a very narrow muddy one, without any extent.
Arriving at the Ducal palace, my Lord treated me very well; however, I had little chance to rest because he was so eager to show me the setup he had created for the entertainment of their Majesties and the entire Court not long before. Although much of it was only temporary and seemingly made of boards, it was still intact. As for the palace, it's an old, shabby building, and the newly constructed brick part is very poorly designed. I thought it would have been much better to tear it all down and build it in a better location rather than continue with it; it sits right in the market square, and although it’s close to a river, it’s a very narrow, muddy one without any real expanse.
Next morning, I went to see Sir Thomas Browne (with whom I had some time corresponded by letter, though I had never seen him before); his whole house and garden being a paradise and cabinet of rarities; and that of the best collection, especially medals, books, plants, and[Pg 73] natural things. Among other curiosities, Sir Thomas had a collection of the eggs of all the fowl and birds he could procure, that country (especially the promontory of Norfolk) being frequented, as he said, by several kinds which seldom or never go further into the land, as cranes, storks, eagles, and variety of water fowl. He led me to see all the remarkable places of this ancient city, being one of the largest, and certainly, after London, one of the noblest of England, for its venerable cathedral, number of stately churches, cleanness of the streets, and buildings of flint so exquisitely headed and squared, as I was much astonished at; but he told me they had lost the art of squaring the flints, in which they so much excelled, and of which the churches, best houses, and walls, are built. The Castle is an antique extent of ground, which now they call Marsfield, and would have been a fitting area to have placed the Ducal palace in. The suburbs are large, the prospects sweet, with other amenities, not omitting the flower gardens, in which all the inhabitants excel. The fabric of stuffs brings a vast trade to this populous town.
The next morning, I went to visit Sir Thomas Browne (whom I had corresponded with for some time through letters, though I had never met him before); his entire house and garden were a paradise filled with rarities, and among the best collections, especially medals, books, plants, and[Pg 73] natural items. Among other curiosities, Sir Thomas had a collection of eggs from all the fowl and birds he could find, as that area (especially the promontory of Norfolk) was frequented, as he mentioned, by several kinds that seldom or never venture further inland, like cranes, storks, eagles, and various kinds of water fowl. He guided me to see all the notable sites of this ancient city, which is one of the largest and certainly, after London, one of the finest in England, thanks to its impressive cathedral, numerous grand churches, clean streets, and buildings made from flint that are intricately shaped and squared, which left me quite astonished; but he told me they had lost the skill of squaring flints, in which they once excelled, and which the churches, best houses, and walls are built from. The Castle is an old expanse of land, now called Marsfield, that would have been a fitting location for a Ducal palace. The suburbs are spacious, the views beautiful, along with other conveniences, including flower gardens where all the residents excel. The textile industry brings a huge trade to this bustling town.
Being returned to my Lord's, who had been with me all this morning, he advised with me concerning a plot to rebuild his house, having already, as he said, erected a front next the street, and a left wing, and now resolving to set up another wing and pavilion next the garden, and to convert the bowling green into stables. My advice was, to desist from all, and to meditate wholly on rebuilding a handsome palace at Arundel House, in the Strand, before he proceeded further here, and then to place this in the Castle, that ground belonging to his Lordship.
Being back at my Lord's, who had been with me all morning, he talked to me about a plan to rebuild his house. He mentioned that he had already put up a front next to the street and a left wing, and was now planning to add another wing and a pavilion next to the garden, as well as turn the bowling green into stables. I advised him to stop all those plans and instead focus entirely on building a beautiful palace at Arundel House, in the Strand, before he went any further here, and then to place this in the Castle, which is land belonging to his Lordship.
I observed that most of the church yards (though some of them large enough) were filled up with earth, or rather the congestion of dead bodies one upon another, for want of earth, even to the very top of the walls, and some above the walls, so as the churches seemed to be built in pits.
I noticed that most of the churchyards (even though some were quite large) were filled with soil, or rather, packed with layers of dead bodies stacked on each other due to a lack of soil, even reaching the tops of the walls, and in some cases, even above the walls, giving the impression that the churches were built in pits.
18th October, 1671. I returned to Euston, in Lord Henry Howard's coach, leaving him at Norwich, in company with a very ingenious gentleman, Mr. White, whose father and mother (daughter to the late Lord Treasurer Weston, Earl of Portland) I knew at Rome, where this[Pg 74] gentleman was born, and where his parents lived and died with much reputation, during their banishment in our civil broils.
18th October, 1671. I returned to Euston in Lord Henry Howard's coach, dropping him off in Norwich, along with a very clever man, Mr. White, whose father and mother (the daughter of the late Lord Treasurer Weston, Earl of Portland) I knew in Rome, where this[Pg 74] gentleman was born, and where his parents lived and died with great respect during their exile due to our civil conflicts.
21st October, 1671. Quitting Euston, I lodged this night at Newmarket, where I found the jolly blades racing, dancing, feasting, and reveling; more resembling a luxurious and abandoned rout, than a Christian Court. The Duke of Buckingham was now in mighty favor, and had with him that impudent woman, the Countess of Shrewsbury, with his band of fiddlers, etc.
21st October, 1671. Leaving Euston, I stayed the night in Newmarket, where I found the lively crowd racing, dancing, feasting, and partying; it felt more like an extravagant and wild celebration than a Christian Court. The Duke of Buckingham was very much in favor and had with him the bold Countess of Shrewsbury, along with his group of musicians, etc.
Next morning, in company with Sir Bernard Gascoyne, and Lord Hawley, I came in the Treasurer's coach to Bishop Stortford, where he gave us a noble supper. The following day, to London, and so home.
Next morning, I joined Sir Bernard Gascoyne and Lord Hawley in the Treasurer's coach to Bishop Stortford, where he treated us to a lavish supper. The next day, we headed to London and then went home.
14th November, 1671. To Council, where Sir Charles Wheeler, late Governor of the Leeward Islands, having been complained of for many indiscreet managements, it was resolved, on scanning many of the particulars, to advise his Majesty to remove him; and consult what was to be done, to prevent these inconveniences he had brought things to. This business staid me in London almost a week, being in Council, or Committee, every morning till the 25th.
14th November, 1671. To the Council, where Sir Charles Wheeler, former Governor of the Leeward Islands, had been complained about for several careless actions. After reviewing many of the details, it was decided to advise His Majesty to remove him and discuss what should be done to prevent the issues he had caused. This matter kept me in London for almost a week, attending Council or Committee meetings every morning until the 25th.
27th November, 1671. We ordered that a proclamation should be presented to his Majesty to sign, against what Sir Charles Wheeler had done in St. Christopher's since the war, on the articles of peace at Breda. He was shortly afterward recalled.
27th November, 1671. We decided that a proclamation should be presented to his Majesty for him to sign, regarding what Sir Charles Wheeler had done in St. Christopher's since the war, concerning the peace agreements made in Breda. He was soon after recalled.
6th December, 1671. Came to visit me Sir William Haywood, a great pretender to English antiquities.
6th December, 1671. Sir William Haywood, a well-known enthusiast of English history, came to visit me.
14th December, 1671. Went to see the Duke of Buckingham's ridiculous farce and rhapsody, called the "The Recital,"29 buffooning all plays, yet profane enough.
14th December, 1671. Went to see the Duke of Buckingham's silly show and rambling performance, called "The Recital,"29 poking fun at all plays, yet still quite inappropriate.
23d December, 1671. The Councillors of the Board of Trade dined together at the Cock, in Suffolk street.
23rd December, 1671. The Councillors of the Board of Trade had dinner together at the Cock, on Suffolk street.
12th January, 1671-72. His Majesty renewed us our lease of Sayes Court pastures for ninety-nine years, but ought, according to his solemn promise30 (as I hope he will still perform), have passed them to us in fee-farm.
12th January, 1671-72. His Majesty renewed our lease of Sayes Court pastures for ninety-nine years, but he should have granted them to us in fee-farm, as he solemnly promised30 (and I hope he still will).
23d January, 1672. To London, in order to Sir Richard Browne, my father-in-law, resigning his place as Clerk[Pg 75] of the Council to Joseph Williamson, Esq., who was admitted, and was knighted. This place his Majesty had promised to give me many years before; but, upon consideration of the renewal of our lease and other reasons, I chose to part with it to Sir Joseph, who gave us and the rest of his brother clerks a handsome supper at his house; and, after supper, a concert of music.
23rd January, 1672. I went to London to see Sir Richard Browne, my father-in-law, as he resigned his position as Clerk[Pg 75] of the Council to Joseph Williamson, Esq., who was accepted and knighted. The King had promised to give me this position many years ago, but after considering the renewal of our lease and other factors, I decided to hand it over to Sir Joseph. He treated us and the other clerks to a nice dinner at his home, and after dinner, we enjoyed a concert.
3d February, 1672. An extraordinary snow; part of the week was taken up in consulting about the commission of prisoners of war, and instructions to our officers, in order to a second war with the Hollanders, his Majesty having made choice of the former commissioners, and myself among them.
3rd February, 1672. An amazing snowfall; part of the week was spent discussing the commission of prisoners of war and giving instructions to our officers for a second conflict with the Dutch, as his Majesty chose the previous commissioners, including myself.
11th February, 1672. In the afternoon, that famous proselyte, Monsieur Brevall, preached at the Abbey, in English, extremely well and with much eloquence. He had been a Capuchin, but much better learned than most of that order.
11th February, 1672. In the afternoon, that well-known convert, Monsieur Brevall, preached at the Abbey in English, very effectively and with a lot of eloquence. He had been a Capuchin but was much better educated than most in that order.
12th February, 1672. At the Council, we entered on inquiries about improving the plantations by silks, galls, flax, senna, etc., and considered how nutmegs and cinnamon might be obtained and brought to Jamaica, that soil and climate promising success. Dr. Worsley being called in, spoke many considerable things to encourage it. We took order to send to the plantations, that none of their ships should adventure homeward single, but stay for company and convoys. We also deliberated on some fit person to go as commissioner to inspect their actions in New England, and, from time to time, report how that people stood affected. In future, to meet at Whitehall.
12th February, 1672. At the Council, we started discussions on how to improve the plantations by producing silks, galls, flax, senna, and other crops, and we looked into how nutmegs and cinnamon could be obtained and brought to Jamaica, since the soil and climate seem promising. Dr. Worsley was called in and offered several valuable suggestions to encourage this initiative. We decided to instruct the plantations that none of their ships should return home alone, but should wait for company and convoys. We also discussed selecting someone suitable to go as a commissioner to oversee their activities in New England and to report back periodically on how the people there are doing. In the future, we will meet at Whitehall.
20th February, 1672. Dr. Parr, of Camberwell, preached a most pathetic funeral discourse and panegyric at the interment of our late pastor, Dr. Breton (who died on the 18th), on "Happy is the servant whom, when his Lord cometh," etc. This good man, among other expressions, professed that he had never been so touched and concerned at any loss as at this, unless at that of King Charles our martyr, and Archbishop Usher, whose chaplain he had been. Dr. Breton had preached on the 28th and 30th of January: on the Friday, having fasted all day, making his provisionary sermon for the Sunday following, he went well to bed; but was taken suddenly ill and expired before help could come to him.[Pg 76]
20th February, 1672. Dr. Parr from Camberwell delivered a moving funeral sermon and tribute at the burial of our former pastor, Dr. Breton (who passed away on the 18th), focusing on "Blessed is the servant whom his Lord finds," etc. This good man expressed that he had never felt so deeply affected by any loss as he did by this one, except for the loss of King Charles, our martyr, and Archbishop Usher, for whom he had been chaplain. Dr. Breton had preached on the 28th and 30th of January: on Friday, after fasting all day to prepare his sermon for the following Sunday, he went to bed well but suddenly fell ill and died before help could arrive.[Pg 76]
Never had a parish a greater loss, not only as he was an excellent preacher, and fitted for our great and vulgar auditory, but for his excellent life and charity, his meekness and obliging nature, industrious, helpful, and full of good works. He left near £400 to the poor in his will, and that what children of his should die in their minority, their portion should be so employed, I lost in particular a special friend, and one that had an extraordinary love for me and mine.
Never had a parish experienced a greater loss. Not only was he an excellent preacher, well-suited for our diverse audience, but he also lived an exemplary life filled with charity, humility, and a helpful spirit, always engaging in good deeds. In his will, he left nearly £400 to the poor, and he specified that if any of his children died young, their portion should be used for that purpose. Personally, I lost a dear friend who had an exceptional love for me and my family.
25th February, 1672. To London, to speak with the Bishop, and Sir John Cutler, our patron, to present Mr. Frampton (afterward Bishop of Gloucester).
25th February, 1672. To London, to meet with the Bishop and Sir John Cutler, our patron, to introduce Mr. Frampton (later the Bishop of Gloucester).
1st March, 1672. A full Council of Plantations, on the danger of the Leeward Islands, threatened by the French, who had taken some of our ships, and began to interrupt our trade. Also in debate, whether the new Governor of St. Christopher should be subordinate to the Governor of Barbadoes. The debate was serious and long.
1st March, 1672. A full Council of Plantations met to discuss the threat to the Leeward Islands from the French, who had captured some of our ships and started to disrupt our trade. They also debated whether the new Governor of St. Christopher should report to the Governor of Barbados. The discussion was intense and lengthy.
12th March, 1672. Now was the first blow given by us to the Dutch convoy of the Smyrna fleet, by Sir Robert Holmes and Lord Ossory, in which we received little save blows, and a worthy reproach for attacking our neighbors ere any war was proclaimed, and then pretending the occasion to be, that some time before, the Merlin yacht chancing to sail through the whole Dutch fleet, their Admiral did not strike to that trifling vessel. Surely, this was a quarrel slenderly grounded, and not becoming Christian neighbors. We are likely to thrive, accordingly. Lord Ossory several times deplored to me his being engaged in it; he had more justice and honor than in the least to approve of it, though he had been over-persuaded to the expedition. There is no doubt but we should have surprised this exceeding rich fleet, had not the avarice and ambition of Holmes and Spragge separated themselves, and willfully divided our fleet, on presumption that either of them was strong enough to deal with the Dutch convoy without joining and mutual help; but they so warmly plied our divided fleets, that while in conflict the merchants sailed away, and got safe into Holland.
12th March, 1672. This was when we struck the first blow against the Dutch convoy of the Smyrna fleet, led by Sir Robert Holmes and Lord Ossory. We faced little but injuries and a proper scolding for attacking our neighbors before any war had been declared. They claimed the reason was that some time earlier, the Merlin yacht had sailed through the entire Dutch fleet, and their Admiral didn't acknowledge that insignificant boat. This was certainly a flimsy reason for a quarrel, unworthy of Christian neighbors. We're likely to suffer because of this. Lord Ossory often expressed his regret to me for being involved; he had too much sense and honor to support it, even though he had been pressured into joining the expedition. There’s no doubt we could have taken this incredibly wealthy fleet by surprise if it weren't for the greed and ambition of Holmes and Spragge, who split our forces and foolishly divided our fleet, thinking either could handle the Dutch convoy alone. However, they were so eager in their attacks on our separate fleets that, while we were engaged in battle, the merchant ships slipped away and reached safety in Holland.
A few days before this, the Treasurer of the Household, Sir Thomas Clifford, hinted to me, as a confidant, that his Majesty would SHUT UP THE EXCHEQUER (and,[Pg 77] accordingly, his Majesty made use of infinite treasure there, to prepare for an intended rupture); but, says he, it will soon be open again, and everybody satisfied; for this bold man, who had been the sole adviser of the King to invade that sacred stock (though some pretend it was Lord Ashley's counsel, then Chancellor of the Exchequer), was so over-confident of the success of this unworthy design against the Smyrna merchants, as to put his Majesty on an action which not only lost the hearts of his subjects, and ruined many widows and orphans, whose stocks were lent him, but the reputation of his Exchequer forever, it being before in such credit, that he might have commanded half the wealth of the nation.
A few days before this, the Treasurer of the Household, Sir Thomas Clifford, hinted to me, as a confidant, that his Majesty would CLOSE THE TREASURY (and,[Pg 77] accordingly, his Majesty was using a lot of treasure there to prepare for an intended conflict); but, he said, it would soon be open again, and everyone would be happy; for this bold man, who had been the sole adviser of the King to raid that sacred fund (though some claim it was Lord Ashley's advice, who was then Chancellor of the Exchequer), was so overconfident about the success of this disgraceful plan against the Smyrna merchants, as to push his Majesty into an action that not only lost the trust of his subjects and ruined many widows and orphans whose funds were lent to him but also damaged the reputation of his Exchequer forever, which had previously been held in such high regard that he could have commanded half the wealth of the nation.
The credit of this bank being thus broken, did exceedingly discontent the people, and never did his Majesty's affairs prosper to any purpose after it, for as it did not supply the expense of the meditated war, so it melted away, I know not how.
The reputation of this bank was seriously damaged, which greatly upset the people, and after that, the King’s affairs never really thrived. It didn’t cover the costs of the planned war, and then it just disappeared, I’m not sure how.
To this succeeded the King's declaration for an universal toleration; Papists and swarms of Sectaries, now boldly showing themselves in their public meetings. This was imputed to the same council, Clifford warping to Rome as was believed, nor was Lord Arlington clear of suspicion, to gratify that party, but as since it has proved, and was then evidently foreseen, to the extreme weakening of the Church of England and its Episcopal Government, as it was projected. I speak not this as my own sense, but what was the discourse and thoughts of others, who were lookers-on; for I think there might be some relaxations without the least prejudice to the present establishment, discreetly limited, but to let go the reins in this manner, and then to imagine they could take them up again as easily, was a false policy, and greatly destructive. The truth is, our Bishops slipped the occasion; for, had they held a steady hand upon his Majesty's restoration, as they might easily have done, the Church of England had emerged and flourished, without interruption; but they were then remiss, and covetous after advantages of another kind while his Majesty suffered them to come into a harvest, with which, without any injustice he might have remunerated innumerable gallant gentlemen for their services who had ruined themselves in the late rebellion.[Pg 78]
To this followed the King's declaration for universal tolerance; Catholics and a multitude of different sects were now openly participating in their public gatherings. This was attributed to the same council, with Clifford allegedly swaying towards Rome, and Lord Arlington was not free from suspicion of catering to that group, but as it has since been shown, and was clearly seen at the time, this greatly weakened the Church of England and its Episcopal governance, as intended. I'm not saying this is my own opinion, but rather what others were discussing and thinking, who were observers; I believe there could have been some concessions made without harming the current establishment, carefully managed. However, to loosen control in this way and then think they could just regain it easily was a misguided strategy and extremely harmful. The truth is, our Bishops lost their chance; had they maintained a firm hold on the King's restoration, as they easily could have, the Church of England would have thrived without disruption. Instead, they were negligent and eager for other kinds of gains while the King allowed them to reap a reward, with which, without any injustice, he could have compensated many brave gentlemen for their service who had ruined themselves during the recent rebellion.[Pg 78]
21st March, 1672. I visited the coasts in my district of Kent, and divers wounded and languishing poor men, that had been in the Smyrna conflict. I went over to see the new-begun Fort of Tilbury; a royal work, indeed, and such as will one day bridle a great city to the purpose, before they are aware.
21st March, 1672. I visited the shores in my area of Kent and saw several injured and suffering men who had been in the Smyrna battle. I also went to check out the newly started Fort of Tilbury; it’s a royal project, for sure, and it will one day control a major city before they even realize it.
23d March, 1672. Captain Cox, one of the Commissioners of the Navy, furnishing me with a yatch, I sailed to Sheerness to see that fort also, now newly finished; several places on both sides the Swale and Medway to Gillingham and Upnore, being also provided with redoubts and batteries to secure the station of our men-of-war at Chatham, and shut the door when the steeds were stolen.
23rd March, 1672. Captain Cox, one of the Navy Commissioners, provided me with a yacht, and I sailed to Sheerness to check out the newly completed fort; several locations on both sides of the Swale and Medway to Gillingham and Upnore are also equipped with forts and batteries to secure the position of our warships at Chatham and protect our base.
24th March, 1672. I saw the chirurgeon cut off the leg of a wounded sailor, the stout and gallant man enduring it with incredible patience, without being bound to his chair, as usual on such painful occasions. I had hardly courage enough to be present. Not being cut off high enough the gangrene prevailed, and the second operation cost the poor creature his life.
24th March, 1672. I watched the surgeon amputate the leg of a wounded sailor, a strong and brave man who endured it with unbelievable patience, without being tied to his chair, as is usually the case during such painful procedures. I barely had the courage to be there. Since it wasn't amputated high enough, gangrene set in, and the second surgery ultimately cost the poor man his life.
Lord! what miseries are mortal men subject to, and what confusion and mischief do the avarice, anger, and ambition of Princes, cause in the world!
Lord! What hardships are people subjected to, and what chaos and trouble do the greed, anger, and ambition of rulers cause in the world!
25th March, 1672. I proceeded to Canterbury, Dover, Deal, the Isle of Thanet, by Sandwich, and so to Margate. Here we had abundance of miserably wounded men, his Majesty sending his chief chirurgeon, Sergeant Knight, to meet me, and Dr. Waldrond had attended me all the journey. Having taken order for the accommodation of the wounded, I came back through a country the best cultivated of any that in my life I had anywhere seen, every field lying as even as a bowling-green, and the fences, plantations, and husbandry, in such admirable order, as infinitely delighted me, after the sad and afflicting spectacles and objects I was come from. Observing almost every tall tree to have a weathercock on the top bough, and some trees half-a-dozen, I learned that, on a certain holyday, the farmers feast their servants; at which solemnity, they set up these cocks, in a kind of triumph.
25th March, 1672. I traveled to Canterbury, Dover, Deal, the Isle of Thanet, via Sandwich, and then to Margate. We had plenty of severely injured men here, and the King sent his head surgeon, Sergeant Knight, to meet me, while Dr. Waldrond accompanied me throughout the journey. After arranging accommodations for the wounded, I returned through a countryside that was the best cultivated I had ever seen, with every field as flat as a bowling green, and the fences, trees, and farming in such impressive order that it filled me with joy after the distressing sights I had just experienced. Noticing that almost every tall tree had a weathercock on its top branch, with some trees having half a dozen, I found out that on a particular holiday, the farmers celebrate by feasting their workers; during this event, they put up these cocks as a kind of celebration.
Being come back toward Rochester, I went to take order respecting the building a strong and high wall about a[Pg 79] house I had hired of a gentleman, at a place called Hartlip, for a prison, paying £50 yearly rent. Here I settled a Provost-Marshal and other officers, returning by Feversham. On the 30th heard a sermon in Rochester cathedral, and so got to Sayes Court on the first of April.
On my way back to Rochester, I went to make arrangements for building a strong, tall wall around a house I had rented from a gentleman in a place called Hartlip, for a prison, paying £50 in annual rent. I appointed a Provost-Marshal and other officers, returning via Feversham. On the 30th, I attended a sermon at Rochester cathedral, and then I arrived at Sayes Court on the first of April.
4th April, 1672. I went to see the fopperies of the Papists at Somerset-House and York-House, where now the French Ambassador had caused to be represented our Blessed Savior at the Pascal Supper with his disciples, in figures and puppets made as big as the life, of wax-work, curiously clad and sitting round a large table, the room nobly hung, and shining with innumerable lamps and candles: this was exposed to all the world; all the city came to see it. Such liberty had the Roman Catholics at this time obtained.
4th April, 1672. I went to check out the show put on by the Catholics at Somerset House and York House, where the French Ambassador had arranged for a display of our Blessed Savior at the Last Supper with his disciples, using lifelike figures and puppets made of wax. They were dressed elaborately and seated around a large table, in a room that was beautifully decorated and lit with countless lamps and candles. This was open to everyone; the whole city came to see it. The Roman Catholics had gained such freedom at this time.
16th April, 1672. Sat in Council, preparing Lord Willoughby's commission and instructions as Governor of Barbadoes and the Caribbee Islands.
16th April, 1672. Sat in Council, preparing Lord Willoughby's commission and instructions as Governor of Barbados and the Caribbean Islands.
17th April, 1672. Sat on business in the Star Chamber.
17th April, 1672. Met for official matters in the Star Chamber.
19th April, 1672. At Council, preparing instructions for Colonel Stapleton, now to go Governor of St. Christopher's, and heard the complaints of the Jamaica merchants against the Spaniards, for hindering them from cutting logwood on the mainland, where they have no pretense.
19th April, 1672. At the Council, we are preparing instructions for Colonel Stapleton, who is now set to become the Governor of St. Christopher's, and we heard the complaints from the Jamaican merchants about the Spaniards for preventing them from cutting logwood on the mainland, where they have no justification.
21st April, 1672. To my Lord of Canterbury, to entreat him to engage Sir John Cutler, the patron, to provide us a grave and learned man, in opposition to a novice.
21st April, 1672. To my Lord of Canterbury, to request him to persuade Sir John Cutler, the sponsor, to find us a serious and knowledgeable person, instead of a beginner.
30th April, 1672. Congratulated Mr. Treasurer Clifford's new honor, being made a Baron.
30th April, 1672. Congratulated Mr. Treasurer Clifford on his new title of Baron.
2d May, 1672. My son, John, was specially admitted of the Middle Temple by Sir Francis North, his Majesty's Solicitor-General, and since Chancellor. I pray God bless this beginning, my intention being that he should seriously apply himself to the study of the law.
2nd May, 1672. My son, John, was officially admitted to the Middle Temple by Sir Francis North, his Majesty's Solicitor-General, who later became Chancellor. I pray God bless this new start, as my goal is for him to truly focus on studying law.
10th May, 1672. I was ordered, by letter from the Council, to repair forthwith to his Majesty, whom I found in the Pall-Mall, in St. James's Park, where his Majesty coming to me from the company, commanded me to go immediately to the seacoast, and to observe the motion of the Dutch fleet and ours, the Duke and so many of the flower of our nation being now under sail, coming from Portsmouth, through the Downs, where it was believed there might be an encounter.[Pg 80]
10th May, 1672. I received a letter from the Council instructing me to go immediately to his Majesty, whom I met in Pall-Mall, St. James's Park. When his Majesty approached me from the group, he ordered me to head straight to the coast and observe the movements of both the Dutch fleet and ours, as the Duke and many of our best people were already sailing from Portsmouth through the Downs, where an encounter was anticipated.[Pg 80]
11th May, 1672. Went to Chatham. 12th. Heard a sermon in Rochester Cathedral.
11th May, 1672. Went to Chatham. 12th. Listened to a sermon in Rochester Cathedral.
13th May, 1672. To Canterbury; visited Dr. Bargrave, my old fellow-traveler in Italy, and great virtuoso.
13th May, 1672. To Canterbury; visited Dr. Bargrave, my old travel buddy from Italy, and a great expert.
14th May, 1672. To Dover; but the fleet did not appear till the 16th, when the Duke of York with his and the French squadron, in all 170 ships (of which above 100 were men-of-war), sailed by, after the Dutch, who were newly withdrawn. Such a gallant and formidable navy never, I think, spread sail upon the seas. It was a goodly yet terrible sight, to behold them as I did, passing eastward by the straits between Dover and Calais in a glorious day. The wind was yet so high, that I could not well go aboard, and they were soon got out of sight. The next day, having visited our prisoners and the Castle, and saluted the Governor, I took horse for Margate. Here, from the North Foreland Lighthouse top (which is a pharos, built of brick, and having on the top a cradle of iron, in which a man attends a great sea-coal fire all the year long, when the nights are dark, for the safeguard of sailors), we could see our fleet as they lay at anchor. The next morning, they weighed, and sailed out of sight to the N. E.
14th May, 1672. I went to Dover, but the fleet didn’t show up until the 16th, when the Duke of York, along with his squadron and the French fleet, totaling 170 ships (over 100 of which were warships), sailed past after the Dutch had just retreated. I don't think I've ever seen such a bold and impressive navy on the seas. It was both a magnificent and daunting sight to see them pass by, heading east through the straits between Dover and Calais on a beautiful day. The wind was blowing so hard that I couldn’t easily board, and they quickly disappeared from view. The next day, after visiting our prisoners and the Castle, and greeting the Governor, I took a horse to Margate. From the top of the North Foreland Lighthouse (a brick tower with an iron cradle at the top where a man tends a large coal fire all year round to guide sailors when the nights are dark), we could see our fleet at anchor. The next morning, they weighed anchor and sailed out of sight to the northeast.
19th May, 1672. Went to Margate; and, the following day, was carried to see a gallant widow, brought up a farmeress, and I think of gigantic race, rich, comely, and exceedingly industrious. She put me in mind of Deborah and Abigail, her house was so plentifully stored with all manner of country provisions, all of her own growth, and all her conveniences so substantial, neat, and well understood; she herself so jolly and hospitable; and her land so trim and rarely husbanded, that it struck me with admiration at her economy.
19th May, 1672. Went to Margate; and the next day, I was taken to meet an impressive widow, raised as a farmers’ daughter, and I think of tall stature, wealthy, attractive, and very hardworking. She reminded me of Deborah and Abigail; her house was abundantly filled with all kinds of local produce, all grown by her, and all her amenities were so solid, tidy, and well organized; she herself was so cheerful and welcoming; and her land was so well-kept and expertly managed that I was filled with admiration for her efficiency.
This town much consists of brewers of a certain heady ale, and they deal much in malt, etc. For the rest, it is raggedly built, and has an ill haven, with a small fort of little concernment, nor is the island well disciplined; but as to the husbandry and rural part, far exceeding any part of England for the accurate culture of their ground, in which they exceed, even to curiosity and emulation.
This town is mostly made up of brewers who produce a specific strong ale, and they primarily trade in malt, among other things. Beyond that, it has a rough layout and a poor harbor, with a small fort that isn’t very significant. The island is also not well organized; however, when it comes to farming and agriculture, it surpasses any other part of England due to the precise way they cultivate their land, to the point of being meticulous and competitive.
We passed by Rickborough, and in sight of Reculvers, and so through a sweet garden, as it were, to Canterbury.[Pg 81]
We went past Rickborough, saw Reculvers, and then walked through what felt like a lovely garden to Canterbury.[Pg 81]
24th May, 1672. To London and gave his Majesty an account of my journey, and that I had put all things in readiness upon all events, and so returned home sufficiently wearied.
24th May, 1672. I went to London and reported to His Majesty about my journey, informing him that I had prepared everything for any situation, and then returned home feeling quite exhausted.
31st May, 1672. I received another command to repair to the seaside; so I went to Rochester, where I found many wounded, sick, and prisoners, newly put on shore after the engagement on the 28th, in which the Earl of Sandwich, that incomparable person and my particular friend, and divers more whom I loved, were lost. My Lord (who was Admiral of the Blue) was in the "Prince," which was burnt, one of the best men-of-war that ever spread canvas on the sea. There were lost with this brave man, a son of Sir Charles Cotterell (Master of the Ceremonies), and a son of Sir Charles Harbord (his Majesty's Surveyor-General), two valiant and most accomplished youths, full of virtue and courage, who might have saved themselves; but chose to perish with my Lord, whom they honored and loved above their own lives.
31st May, 1672. I got another order to head to the beach; so I went to Rochester, where I found many wounded, sick, and prisoners who had just been brought ashore after the battle on the 28th, in which the Earl of Sandwich, an amazing person and my close friend, along with several others I cared about, were lost. My Lord (who was Admiral of the Blue) was on the "Prince," which was burned, one of the best warships that ever sailed the seas. Along with this brave man, a son of Sir Charles Cotterell (Master of the Ceremonies), and a son of Sir Charles Harbord (his Majesty's Surveyor-General), both valiant and exceptionally accomplished young men, full of virtue and courage, could have saved themselves; but they chose to die with my Lord, whom they honored and loved more than their own lives.
Here, I cannot but make some reflections on things past. It was not above a day or two that going to Whitehall to take leave of his Lordship, who had his lodgings in the Privy-Garden, shaking me by the hand he bid me good-by, and said he thought he would see me no more, and I saw, to my thinking, something boding in his countenance: "No," says he, "they will not have me live. Had I lost a fleet (meaning on his return from Bergen when he took the East India prize) I should have fared better; but, be as it pleases God—I must do something, I know not what, to save my reputation." Something to this effect, he had hinted to me; thus I took my leave. I well remember that the Duke of Albemarle, and my now Lord Clifford, had, I know not why, no great opinion of his courage, because, in former conflicts, being an able and experienced seaman (which neither of them were), he always brought off his Majesty's ships without loss, though not without as many marks of true courage as the stoutest of them; and I am a witness that, in the late war, his own ship was pierced like a colander. But the business was, he was utterly against this war from the beginning, and abhorred the attacking of the Smyrna fleet; he did not favor the heady expedition of[Pg 82] Clifford at Bergen, nor was he so furious and confident as was the Duke of Albemarle, who believed he could vanquish the Hollanders with one squadron. My Lord Sandwich was prudent as well as valiant, and always governed his affairs with success and little loss; he was for deliberation and reason, they for action and slaughter without either; and for this, whispered as if my Lord Sandwich was not so gallant, because he was not so rash, and knew how fatal it was to lose a fleet, such as was that under his conduct, and for which these very persons would have censured him on the other side. This it was, I am confident, grieved him, and made him enter like a lion, and fight like one too, in the midst of the hottest service, where the stoutest of the rest seeing him engaged, and so many ships upon him, dared not, or would not, come to his succor, as some of them, whom I know, might have done. Thus, this gallant person perished, to gratify the pride and envy of some I named.
Here, I can’t help but reflect on the past. It was just a day or two ago when I went to Whitehall to say goodbye to his Lordship, who was staying in the Privy-Garden. He shook my hand and told me goodbye, saying he didn’t think he would see me again. I noticed something ominous in his expression: "No," he said, "they won't let me live. If I had lost a fleet (referring to his return from Bergen when he captured the East India prize), I would have fared better; but, as it pleases God—I must do something, though I don’t know what, to save my reputation." He hinted something like that to me; then I took my leave. I clearly remember that the Duke of Albemarle and my current Lord Clifford, for reasons I don’t understand, didn’t have a high opinion of his courage. Despite being an able and experienced seaman (which neither of them were), he always brought back the King’s ships without loss, even if he didn’t show as many signs of true bravery as the boldest of them. I can attest that, in the recent war, his own ship was shot up like a colander. The issue was that he completely opposed this war from the start and hated the idea of attacking the Smyrna fleet. He wasn’t in favor of Clifford’s reckless expedition at Bergen, nor was he as aggressive and confident as the Duke of Albemarle, who thought he could defeat the Dutch with just one squadron. My Lord Sandwich was both wise and brave, always managing his affairs successfully with minimal loss; he believed in careful thought and reason, while they were all about action and slaughter without any strategy. This led to whispers that my Lord Sandwich wasn’t as brave because he wasn’t reckless, knowing how devastating it was to lose a fleet like the one under his command, for which these same people would have criticized him from the other side. I’m sure this troubled him and made him fight fiercely, like a lion, even in the toughest battles, where the bravest among the rest, seeing him engaged while so many ships surrounded him, dared not, or wouldn’t, come to his aid, even though some of them could have. Thus, this brave man perished to satisfy the pride and jealousy of some I mentioned.
Deplorable was the loss of one of the best accomplished persons, not only of this nation, but of any other. He was learned in sea affairs, in politics, in mathematics, and in music: he had been on divers embassies, was of a sweet and obliging temper, sober, chaste, very ingenious, a true nobleman, an ornament to the Court and his Prince; nor has he left any behind him who approach his many virtues.
The loss of one of the most accomplished individuals, not just in this country but in any other, is truly lamentable. He was knowledgeable about maritime matters, politics, mathematics, and music. He had undertaken various diplomatic missions, was kind and accommodating, disciplined, pure, exceptionally talented, a true nobleman, and a great asset to the Court and his Prince. Moreover, there’s no one left who even comes close to his many virtues.
He had, I confess, served the tyrant Cromwell, when a young man, but it was without malice, as a soldier of fortune; and he readily submitted, and that with joy, bringing an entire fleet with him from the Sound, at the first tidings of his Majesty's restoration. I verily believe him as faithful a subject as any that were not his friends. I am yet heartily grieved at this mighty loss, nor do I call it to my thoughts without emotion.
He did, I admit, serve the tyrant Cromwell when he was younger, but it was without any malice, as a soldier looking for fortune; and he willingly went along with it, even with joy, bringing an entire fleet with him from the Sound at the first news of his Majesty's return. I genuinely believe he is as loyal a subject as anyone who was not his friend. I am still deeply upset about this significant loss, and I can't think about it without feeling emotional.
2d June, 1672. Trinity Sunday, I passed at Rochester; and, on the 5th, there was buried in the Cathedral Monsieur Rabiniére, Rear Admiral of the French squadron, a gallant person, who died of the wounds he received in the fight. This ceremony lay on me, which I performed with all the decency I could, inviting the Mayor and Aldermen to come in their formalities. Sir Jonas Atkins was there with his guards; and the Dean and Prebendaries: one of his countrymen pronouncing a funeral ora[Pg 83]tion at the brink of his grave, which I caused to be dug in the choir. This is more at large described in the "Gazette" of that day; Colonel Reymes, my colleague in commission, assisting, who was so kind as to accompany me from London, though it was not his district; for indeed the stress of both these wars lay more on me by far than on any of my brethren, who had little to do in theirs. I went to see Upnore Castle, which I found pretty well defended, but of no great moment.
2nd June, 1672. Trinity Sunday, I was in Rochester; and on the 5th, a funeral was held in the Cathedral for Monsieur Rabiniére, Rear Admiral of the French squadron, a brave man who died from his battle wounds. I organized the ceremony as respectfully as I could, inviting the Mayor and Aldermen to attend in their formal attire. Sir Jonas Atkins was present with his guards, along with the Dean and Prebendaries; one of his countrymen delivered a eulogy at the edge of his grave, which I arranged to be dug in the choir. This is elaborated on in that day’s "Gazette"; Colonel Reymes, my fellow commissioner, was kind enough to accompany me from London, even though it wasn’t his area of jurisdiction; indeed, I felt the pressure of both these wars much more than any of my colleagues, who had little involvement in theirs. I visited Upnore Castle, which I found reasonably well-defended, but not particularly significant.
Next day I sailed to the fleet, now riding at the buoy of the "Nore," where I met his Majesty, the Duke, Lord Arlington, and all the great men, in the "Charles," lying miserably shattered; but the miss of Lord Sandwich redoubled the loss to me, and showed the folly of hazarding so brave a fleet, and losing so many good men, for no provocation but that the Hollanders exceeded us in industry, and in all things but envy.
Next day, I went to the fleet, now anchored at the buoy of the "Nore," where I met His Majesty, the Duke, Lord Arlington, and all the important figures, on the "Charles," which was lying in a terrible state. But the absence of Lord Sandwich made my loss even more painful and highlighted the foolishness of risking such a brave fleet and losing so many good men, all for no reason other than that the Dutch were more industrious than us and better at everything except envy.
19th June, 1672. To London again, to solicit the same.
19th June, 1672. Back to London again to ask for the same thing.
21st June, 1672. At a Council of Plantations. Most of this week busied with the sick and wounded.
21st June, 1672. At a Council of Plantations. Most of this week has been spent caring for the sick and injured.
3d July, 1672. To Lord Sandwich's funeral, which was by water to Westminster, in solemn pomp.
3rd July, 1672. Lord Sandwich's funeral took place, traveling by water to Westminster, in grand style.
31st July, 1672. I entertained the Maids of Honor (among whom there was one I infinitely esteemed for her many and extraordinary virtues31) at a comedy this afternoon, and so went home.
31st July, 1672. I hosted the Maids of Honor (including one I greatly admired for her numerous and remarkable qualities31) at a comedy this afternoon, and then went home.
1st August, 1672. I was at the betrothal of Lord Arlington's only daughter (a sweet child if ever there was any32) to the Duke of Grafton, the King's natural son by[Pg 84] the Duchess of Cleveland; the Archbishop of Canterbury officiating, the King and the grandees being present. I had a favor given me by my Lady; but took no great joy at the thing for many reasons.
1st August, 1672. I attended the engagement of Lord Arlington's only daughter (a lovely girl if there ever was one32) to the Duke of Grafton, the King's illegitimate son by[Pg 84] the Duchess of Cleveland; the Archbishop of Canterbury officiated, with the King and the nobles present. I received a token from my Lady; however, I didn’t feel much joy about the event for several reasons.
18th August, 1672. Sir James Hayes, Secretary to Prince Rupert, dined with me; after dinner I was sent to Gravesend to dispose of no fewer than 800 sick men. That night I got to the fleet at the buoy of the "Nore," where I spoke with the King and the Duke; and, after dinner next day, returned to Gravesend.
18th August, 1672. Sir James Hayes, Secretary to Prince Rupert, had dinner with me; after dinner, I was sent to Gravesend to take care of no fewer than 800 sick men. That night, I arrived at the fleet at the buoy of the "Nore," where I spoke with the King and the Duke; and, after dinner the next day, I returned to Gravesend.
1st September, 1672. I spent this week in soliciting for moneys, and in reading to my Lord Clifford my papers relating to the first Holland war. Now, our Council of Plantations met at Lord Shaftesbury's (Chancellor of the Exchequer) to read and reform the draft of our new Patent, joining the Council of Trade to our political capacities. After this, I returned home, in order to another excursion to the seaside, to get as many as possible of the men who were recovered on board the fleet.
1st September, 1672. I spent this week trying to raise money and reading my papers about the first Holland war to my Lord Clifford. Our Council of Plantations met at Lord Shaftesbury's (Chancellor of the Exchequer) to review and revise the draft of our new Patent, combining the Council of Trade with our political roles. After that, I went home, preparing for another trip to the seaside to gather as many of the men who had recovered on board the fleet as possible.
8th September, 1672. I lay at Gravesend, thence to Rochester, returning on the 11th.
8th September, 1672. I was in Gravesend, then headed to Rochester, returning on the 11th.
15th September, 1672. Dr. Duport, Greek Professor of Cambridge, preached before the King, on 1 Timothy vi. 6. No great preacher, but a very worthy and learned man.
15th September, 1672. Dr. Duport, Greek Professor at Cambridge, preached before the King, on 1 Timothy vi. 6. Not a great preacher, but a very respectable and knowledgeable man.
25th September, 1672. I dined at Lord John Berkeley's, newly arrived out of Ireland, where he had been Deputy; it was in his new house, or rather palace; for I am assured it stood him in near £30,000. It was very well built, and has many noble rooms, but they are not very convenient, consisting but of one Corps de Logis; they are all rooms of state, without closets. The staircase is of cedar, the furniture is princely: the kitchen and stables are ill placed, and the corridor worse, having no report to the wings they join to. For the rest, the fore-court is noble, so are the stables; and, above all, the gardens, which are incomparable by reason of the inequality of the ground, and a pretty piscina. The holly hedges on the terrace I advised the planting of. The porticos are in imitation of a house described by Palladio; but it happens to be the worst in his book, though my good friend, Mr. Hugh May, his Lordship's architect, effected it.[Pg 85]
25th September, 1672. I had dinner at Lord John Berkeley's, who had just arrived from Ireland, where he served as Deputy. It was in his new house, or rather palace; I've heard it cost him nearly £30,000. It’s very well built and has many impressive rooms, but they aren’t very practical, as it has only one Corps de Logis; they’re all state rooms with no closets. The staircase is made of cedar, and the furniture is fit for royalty: however, the kitchen and stables are poorly located, and the corridor is even worse, as it doesn’t connect well to the wings it leads to. On the bright side, the forecourt is magnificent, as are the stables; but above all, the gardens are unmatched due to the uneven terrain and a lovely piscina. I suggested planting the holly hedges on the terrace. The porticos are modeled after a house designed by Palladio; unfortunately, it’s the worst one in his book, although my good friend, Mr. Hugh May, Lord John’s architect, made it happen.[Pg 85]
26th September, 1672. I carried with me to dinner my Lord H. Howard (now to be made Earl of Norwich and Earl Marshal of England) to Sir Robert Clayton's, now Sheriff of London, at his new house, where we had a great feast; it is built indeed for a great magistrate, at excessive cost. The cedar dining room is painted with the history of the Giants' War, incomparably done by Mr. Streeter, but the figures are too near the eye.
26th September, 1672. I took my Lord H. Howard (who is about to be made Earl of Norwich and Earl Marshal of England) to dinner at Sir Robert Clayton's, who is now the Sheriff of London, in his new house where we had an extravagant feast; it’s definitely built for a high-ranking official, at an outrageous cost. The cedar dining room is painted with the story of the Giants' War, done exceptionally well by Mr. Streeter, but the figures are placed too close to the eye.
6th October, 1672. Dr. Thistlethwaite preached at Whitehall on Rev. v. 2,—a young, but good preacher. I received the blessed Communion, Dr. Blandford, Bishop of Worcester, and Dean of the Chapel, officiating. Dined at my Lord Clifford's, with Lord Mulgrave, Sir Gilbert Talbot, and Sir Robert Holmes.
6th October, 1672. Dr. Thistlethwaite preached at Whitehall on Rev. v. 2—a young but talented preacher. I received the holy Communion, with Dr. Blandford, Bishop of Worcester, and Dean of the Chapel, leading the service. I had lunch at Lord Clifford's with Lord Mulgrave, Sir Gilbert Talbot, and Sir Robert Holmes.
8th October, 1672. I took leave of my Lady Sunderland, who was going to Paris to my Lord, now ambassador there. She made me stay to dinner at Leicester House, and afterward sent for Richardson, the famous fire-eater. He devoured brimstone on glowing coals before us, chewing and swallowing them; he melted a beer-glass and ate it quite up; then, taking a live coal on his tongue, he put on it a raw oyster, the coal was blown on with bellows till it flamed and sparkled in his mouth, and so remained till the oyster gaped and was quite boiled. Then, he melted pitch and wax with sulphur, which he drank down as it flamed; I saw it flaming in his mouth a good while; he also took up a thick piece of iron, such as laundresses use to put in their smoothing boxes, when it was fiery hot, held it between his teeth, then in his hand, and threw it about like a stone; but this, I observed, he cared not to hold very long; then he stood on a small pot, and, bending his body, took a glowing iron with his mouth from between his feet, without touching the pot, or ground, with his hands; with divers other prodigious feats.
8th October, 1672. I said goodbye to Lady Sunderland, who was heading to Paris to join my Lord, who is now the ambassador there. She invited me to stay for dinner at Leicester House, and afterward, she called for Richardson, the famous fire-eater. He consumed brimstone on glowing coals in front of us, chewing and swallowing them; he melted a beer glass and ate it completely; then, taking a live coal on his tongue, he placed a raw oyster on it, which was blown on with bellows until it flamed and sparkled in his mouth, and remained there until the oyster opened up and was fully cooked. Next, he melted pitch and wax with sulfur, which he drank down as it burned; I saw it blazing in his mouth for quite some time; he also picked up a thick piece of iron, like the ones laundresses use in their smoothing boxes, when it was scorching hot, held it between his teeth, then in his hand, and tossed it around like a stone; but I noticed he didn’t want to hold that one for too long; then he stood on a small pot and, bending his body, took a glowing iron with his mouth from between his feet without touching the pot or the ground with his hands, along with various other incredible feats.
13th October, 1672. After sermon (being summoned before), I went to my Lord Keeper's, Sir Orlando Bridgeman, at Essex House, where our new patent was opened and read, constituting us that were of the Council of Plantations, to be now of the Council of Trade also, both united. After the patent was read, we all took our oaths, and departed.[Pg 86]
13th October, 1672. After the sermon (having been called beforehand), I went to see my Lord Keeper, Sir Orlando Bridgeman, at Essex House, where our new patent was announced and read. It established that those of us on the Council of Plantations would now also be part of the Council of Trade, merging both groups. After the patent was read, we all took our oaths and then left.[Pg 86]
24th October, 1672. Met in Council, the Earl of Shaftesbury, now our president, swearing our secretary and his clerks, which was Mr. Locke, an excellent learned gentleman, and student of Christ Church, Mr. Lloyd, and Mr. Frowde. We dispatched a letter to Sir Thomas Linch, Governor of Jamaica, giving him notice of a design of the Dutch on that island.
24th October, 1672. The Council met, with the Earl of Shaftesbury as our president, swearing in our secretary and his assistants, Mr. Locke, a highly educated gentleman and student at Christ Church, Mr. Lloyd, and Mr. Frowde. We sent a letter to Sir Thomas Linch, the Governor of Jamaica, informing him of a Dutch plan concerning that island.
27th October, 1672. I went to hear that famous preacher, Dr. Frampton, at St. Giles's, on Psalm xxxix. 6. This divine had been twice at Jerusalem, and was not only a very pious and holy man, but excellent in the pulpit for the moving affections.
27th October, 1672. I went to hear that famous preacher, Dr. Frampton, at St. Giles's, on Psalm xxxix. 6. This preacher had been to Jerusalem twice and was not only a very devout and holy man but also exceptional in the pulpit for stirring emotions.
8th November, 1672. At Council, we debated the business of the consulate of Leghorn. I was of the committee with Sir Humphry Winch, the chairman, to examine the laws of his Majesty's several plantations and colonies in the West Indies, etc.
8th November, 1672. At the Council, we discussed the consulate of Leghorn. I was on the committee with Sir Humphry Winch, the chairman, to review the laws of His Majesty's various plantations and colonies in the West Indies, etc.
30th November, 1672. I was chosen secretary to the Royal Society.
30th November, 1672. I was selected as the secretary for the Royal Society.
21st December, 1672. Settled the consulate of Venice.
21st December, 1672. Established the Venetian consulate.
1st January, 1672-73. After public prayers in the chapel at Whitehall, when I gave God solemn thanks for all his mercies to me the year past, and my humble supplications to him for his blessing the year now entering, I returned home, having my poor deceased servant (Adams) to bury, who died of pleurisy.
1st January, 1672-73. After the public prayers in the chapel at Whitehall, I sincerely thanked God for all the blessings He gave me last year and humbly asked for His guidance in the year ahead. I went home, preparing to bury my poor deceased servant (Adams), who died of pleurisy.
3d January, 1673. My son now published his version of "Raptinus Hortorum."
3rd January, 1673. My son has now published his version of "Raptinus Hortorum."
28th January, 1673. Visited Don Francisco de Melos, the Portugal Ambassador, who showed me his curious collection of books and pictures. He was a person of good parts, and a virtuous man.
28th January, 1673. I visited Don Francisco de Melos, the Portuguese Ambassador, who showed me his interesting collection of books and pictures. He was a man of good character and a virtuous person.
6th February, 1673. To Council about reforming an abuse of the dyers with saundus, and other false drugs; examined divers of that trade.
6th February, 1673. To the Council about addressing the misuse of the dyers with saundus, and other counterfeit substances; examined various individuals in that trade.
23d February, 1673. The Bishop of Chichester preached before the King on Coloss. ii. 14, 15, admirably well, as he can do nothing but what is well.[Pg 87]
23rd February, 1673. The Bishop of Chichester gave a great sermon in front of the King on Colossians 2:14-15, as he can only do things well.[Pg 87]
5th March, 1673. Our new vicar, Mr. Holden, preached in Whitehall chapel, on Psalm iv. 6, 7. This gentleman is a very excellent and universal scholar, a good and wise man; but he had not the popular way of preaching, nor is in any measure fit for our plain and vulgar auditory, as his predecessor was. There was, however, no comparison between their parts for profound learning. But time and experience may form him to a more practical way than that he is in of University lectures and erudition; which is now universally left off for what is much more profitable.
5th March, 1673. Our new vicar, Mr. Holden, preached in Whitehall chapel on Psalm iv. 6, 7. This gentleman is an excellent and well-rounded scholar, a good and wise man; however, he doesn't have the popular style of preaching, nor is he really suited for our straightforward and common audience, unlike his predecessor. Nevertheless, there was no comparison between their depth of knowledge. But with time and experience, he may develop a more practical approach than his current one of university lectures and scholarship, which has now generally fallen out of favor for what is much more useful.
15th March, 1673. I heard the speech made to the Lords in their House by Sir Samuel Tuke, in behalf of the Papists, to take off the penal laws; and then dined with Colonel Norwood.
15th March, 1673. I listened to the speech given to the Lords in their House by Sir Samuel Tuke, representing the Papists, asking to repeal the penal laws; and then I had lunch with Colonel Norwood.
16th March, 1673. Dr. Pearson, Bishop of Chester, preached on Hebrews ix. 14; a most incomparable sermon from one of the most learned divines of our nation. I dined at my Lord Arlington's with the Duke and Duchess of Monmouth; she is one of the wisest and craftiest of her sex, and has much wit. Here was also the learned Isaac Vossius.
16th March, 1673. Dr. Pearson, Bishop of Chester, preached on Hebrews ix. 14; a truly exceptional sermon from one of the most knowledgeable theologians in our country. I had lunch at my Lord Arlington's with the Duke and Duchess of Monmouth; she is one of the smartest and most cunning women around, and she has a lot of wit. Also present was the learned Isaac Vossius.
During Lent there is constantly the most excellent preaching by the most eminent bishops and divines of the nation.
During Lent, there’s consistently outstanding preaching by the most distinguished bishops and theologians in the country.
26th March, 1673. I was sworn a younger brother of the Trinity House, with my most worthy and long-acquainted noble friend, Lord Ossory (eldest son to the Duke of Ormond), Sir Richard Browne, my father-in-law, being now Master of that Society; after which there was a great collation.
26th March, 1673. I was initiated as a younger brother of the Trinity House, alongside my esteemed and longtime friend, Lord Ossory (the eldest son of the Duke of Ormond), with my father-in-law, Sir Richard Browne, currently serving as Master of that Society; following this, there was a lavish feast.
29th March, 1673. I carried my son to the Bishop of Chichester, that learned and pious man, Dr. Peter Gunning, to be instructed by him before he received the Holy Sacrament, when he gave him most excellent advice, which I pray God may influence and remain with him as long as he lives; and O that I had been so blessed and instructed, when first I was admitted to that sacred ordinance!
29th March, 1673. I took my son to the Bishop of Chichester, the wise and devout Dr. Peter Gunning, to be taught by him before he received the Holy Sacrament. He gave him exceptional advice, which I hope God will guide him by and hold onto for his entire life; and oh, how I wish I had received such blessings and guidance when I was first welcomed into that sacred ordinance!
30th March, 1673. Easter day. Myself and son received the blessed Communion, it being his first time, and with that whole week's more extraordinary preparation. I beseech God to make him a sincere and[Pg 88] good Christian, while I endeavor to instill into him the fear and love of God, and discharge the duty of a father.
30th March, 1673. Easter Sunday. My son and I took part in the blessed Communion, marking his first time, along with an extra special week of preparation. I pray that God makes him a genuine and[Pg 88] good Christian, while I work to instill in him the fear and love of God and fulfill my responsibilities as a father.
At the sermon coram Rege, preached by Dr. Sparrow, Bishop of Exeter, to a most crowded auditory; I stayed to see whether, according to custom, the Duke of York received the Communion with the King; but he did not, to the amazement of everybody. This being the second year he had forborne, and put it off, and within a day of the Parliament sitting, who had lately made so severe an Act against the increase of Popery, gave exceeding grief and scandal to the whole nation, that the heir of it, and the son of a martyr for the Protestant religion, should apostatize. What the consequence of this will be, God only knows, and wise men dread.
At the sermon coram Rege, delivered by Dr. Sparrow, Bishop of Exeter, to a very crowded audience; I stayed to see if, as usual, the Duke of York would take Communion with the King; but he didn’t, much to everyone’s surprise. This was the second year in a row he had skipped it, especially just a day before Parliament was set to meet, which had recently passed a strict law against the rise of Catholicism. This caused great distress and outrage across the nation since the heir, and the son of a martyr for the Protestant faith, was seen to be abandoning it. Only God knows what the outcome of this will be, and wise people are worried.
11th April, 1673. I dined with the plenipotentiaries designed for the treaty of Nimeguen.
11th April, 1673. I had dinner with the representatives assigned for the treaty of Nimeguen.
17th April, 1673. I carried Lady Tuke to thank the Countess of Arlington for speaking to his Majesty in her behalf, for being one of the Queen Consort's women. She carried us up into her new dressing room at Goring House, where was a bed, two glasses, silver jars, and vases, cabinets, and other so rich furniture as I had seldom seen; to this excess of superfluity were we now arrived and that not only at Court, but almost universally, even to wantonness and profusion.
17th April, 1673. I took Lady Tuke to thank the Countess of Arlington for talking to the King on her behalf, since she is one of the Queen Consort's ladies. She brought us up to her new dressing room at Goring House, which had a bed, two mirrors, silver jars, vases, cabinets, and other incredibly luxurious furniture that I had rarely seen; we had reached this level of excess not only at Court but almost everywhere, even to the point of extravagance and lavishness.
Dr. Compton, brother to the Earl of Northampton, preached on 1 Corinth. v. 11-16, showing the Church's power in ordaining things indifferent; this worthy person's talent is not preaching, but he is likely to make a grave and serious good man.
Dr. Compton, brother of the Earl of Northampton, preached on 1 Corinthians 5:11-16, demonstrating the Church's authority in deciding on neutral matters; this respectable person's skill isn't in preaching, but he is expected to become a dignified and sincere good man.
I saw her Majesty's rich toilet in her dressing room, being all of massy gold, presented to her by the King, valued at £4,000.
I saw her Majesty's lavish dressing table in her room, made entirely of solid gold, given to her by the King, worth £4,000.
26th April, 1673. Dr. Lamplugh preached at St. Martin's the Holy Sacrament following, which I partook of, upon obligation of the late Act of Parliament, enjoining everybody in office, civil or military, under penalty of £500, to receive it within one month before two authentic witnesses; being engrossed on parchment, to be afterward produced in the Court of Chancery, or some other Court of Record; which I did at the Chancery bar, as being one of the Council of Plantations and Trade; taking then also[Pg 89] the oath of allegiance and supremacy, signing the clause in the said Act against Transubstantiation.
26th April, 1673. Dr. Lamplugh preached at St. Martin's, and I took part in the Holy Sacrament afterward, as required by the recent Act of Parliament, which mandated everyone in civil or military office to receive it within a month before two authentic witnesses, under threat of a £500 penalty. This was documented on parchment to be later submitted in the Court of Chancery or another Court of Record. I fulfilled this requirement at the Chancery bar, as I was one of the Council of Plantations and Trade; I also took the oath of allegiance and supremacy then, signing the clause in the Act against Transubstantiation.
25th May, 1673. My son was made a younger brother of the Trinity House. The new master was Sir J. Smith, one of the Commissioners of the Navy, a stout seaman, who had interposed and saved the Duke from perishing by a fire ship in the late war.
25th May, 1673. My son was appointed a junior member of the Trinity House. The new master was Sir J. Smith, one of the Navy Commissioners, a strong seaman, who had stepped in and saved the Duke from dying in a fire ship during the recent war.
28th May, 1673. I carried one Withers, an ingenious shipwright, to the King to show him some new method of building.
28th May, 1673. I took a guy named Withers, a clever shipbuilder, to the King to show him a new way of constructing ships.
29th May, 1673. I saw the Italian comedy at the Court, this afternoon.
29th May, 1673. I watched the Italian comedy at the court this afternoon.
10th June, 1673. Came to visit and dine with me my Lord Viscount Cornbury and his Lady; Lady Frances Hyde, sister to the Duchess of York; and Mrs. Dorothy Howard, maid of Honor. We went, after dinner, to see the formal and formidable camp on Blackheath, raised to invade Holland; or, as others suspected for another design. Thence, to the Italian glass-house at Greenwich, where glass was blown of finer metal than that of Murano, at Venice.
10th June, 1673. My Lord Viscount Cornbury and his wife, Lady Frances Hyde, sister to the Duchess of York, along with Mrs. Dorothy Howard, maid of honor, came to visit and have dinner with me. After dinner, we went to see the impressive camp on Blackheath that was set up to invade Holland; or, as some suspected, for another design. From there, we went to the Italian glasshouse in Greenwich, where they blew glass made of finer material than that of Murano in Venice.
13th June, 1673. Came to visit us, with other ladies of rank, Mrs. Sedley,33 daughter to Sir Charles, who was none of the most virtuous, but a wit.
13th June, 1673. Mrs. Sedley,33 daughter of Sir Charles, came to visit us along with other ladies of status. He wasn't exactly the most virtuous, but he was a clever guy.
19th June, 1673. Congratulated the new Lord Treasurer, Sir Thomas Osborne, a gentleman with whom I had been intimately acquainted at Paris, and who was every day at my father-in-law's house and table there; on which account I was too confident of succeeding in his favor, as I had done in his predecessor's; but such a friend shall I never find, and I neglected my time, far from believing that my Lord Clifford would have so rashly laid down his staff, as he did, to the amazement of all the world, when it came to the test of his receiving the Communion, which I am confident he forbore more from some promise he had entered into to gratify the Duke, than from any prejudice to the Protestant religion, though I found him wavering a pretty while.
19th June, 1673. I congratulated the new Lord Treasurer, Sir Thomas Osborne, a man I had been close with in Paris, where he was a regular guest at my father-in-law's home and at our meals. Because of this, I was overly confident that I would win his favor, just like I had with his predecessor. However, I realize now that I'll never find such a friend again, and I wasted my opportunity, never thinking that Lord Clifford would so foolishly give up his position, which shocked everyone when it came to his receiving Communion. I believe he avoided it more out of a promise he made to please the Duke than out of any bias against the Protestant faith, although I noticed he was uncertain about it for quite some time.
23d June, 1673. To London, to accompany our Council who went in a body to congratulate the new Lord[Pg 90] Treasurer, no friend to it because promoted by my Lord Arlington, whom he hated.
23rd June, 1673. I went to London to join our Council, who went together to congratulate the new Lord[Pg 90] Treasurer, although he wasn't really a friend of ours since he was promoted by my Lord Arlington, whom he despised.
26th June, 1673. Came visitors from Court to dine with me and see the army still remaining encamped on Blackheath.
26th June, 1673. Visitors from the Court came to have dinner with me and check out the army that is still camped on Blackheath.
6th July, 1673. This evening I went to the funeral of my dear and excellent friend, that good man and accomplished gentleman, Sir Robert Murray, Secretary of Scotland. He was buried by order of his Majesty in Westminster Abbey.
6th July, 1673. This evening I attended the funeral of my dear and wonderful friend, that good man and accomplished gentleman, Sir Robert Murray, Secretary of Scotland. He was buried by the order of His Majesty in Westminster Abbey.
25th July, 1673. I went to Tunbridge Wells, to visit my Lord Clifford, late Lord Treasurer, who was there to divert his mind more than his body; it was believed that he had so engaged himself to the Duke, that rather than take the Test, without which he was not capable of holding any office, he would resign that great and honorable station. This, I am confident, grieved him to the heart, and at last broke it; for, though he carried with him music, and people to divert him, and, when I came to see him, lodged me in his own apartment, and would not let me go from him, I found he was struggling in his mind; and being of a rough and ambitious nature, he could not long brook the necessity he had brought on himself, of submission to this conjuncture. Besides, he saw the Dutch war, which was made much by his advice, as well as the shutting up of the Exchequer, very unprosperous. These things his high spirit could not support. Having stayed here two or three days, I obtained leave of my Lord to return.
25th July, 1673. I went to Tunbridge Wells to visit my Lord Clifford, the former Lord Treasurer, who was there more to distract his mind than to rest his body; people believed he was so committed to the Duke that he would rather resign his important and respected position than take the Test, which was required to hold any office. I’m sure this saddened him deeply and ultimately broke his spirit; even though he brought music and company to entertain him, and when I visited, he had me stay in his own room and wouldn’t let me leave, I could see he was struggling internally. Being naturally rough and ambitious, he couldn’t tolerate the situation he had created for himself and the need to submit to it. Additionally, he saw the Dutch war, which he had significantly influenced, as well as the closing of the Exchequer, as very unfavorable. His strong spirit couldn’t handle these setbacks. After staying there for two or three days, I received permission from my Lord to return.
In my way, I saw my Lord of Dorset's house at Knowle, near Sevenoaks, a great old-fashioned house.
In my journey, I saw my Lord of Dorset's house at Knowle, near Sevenoaks, a large, old-fashioned house.
30th July, 1673. To Council, where the business of transporting wool was brought before us.
30th July, 1673. To Council, where the matter of transporting wool was presented to us.
31st July, 1673. I went to see the pictures of all the judges and eminent men of the Long Robe, newly painted by Mr. Wright, and set up in Guildhall, costing the city £1,000. Most of them are very like the persons they represent, though I never took Wright to be any considerable artist.
31st July, 1673. I went to check out the portraits of all the judges and notable figures in the Long Robe, recently painted by Mr. Wright and displayed in Guildhall, costing the city £1,000. Most of them really resemble the people they depict, although I never thought of Wright as a particularly significant artist.
13th August, 1673. I rode to Durdans, where I dined at my Lord Berkeley's of Berkeley Castle, my old and noble friend, it being his wedding anniversary, where I found the Duchess of Albemarle, and other company, and returned home on that evening late.[Pg 91]
13th August, 1673. I rode to Durdans, where I had dinner at my friend Lord Berkeley's place, Berkeley Castle, to celebrate his wedding anniversary. There, I met the Duchess of Albemarle and some other guests, and I returned home late that evening.[Pg 91]
15th August, 1673. Came to visit me my Lord Chancellor, the Earl of Shaftesbury.
15th August, 1673. My Lord Chancellor, the Earl of Shaftesbury, came to visit me.
18th August, 1673. My Lord Clifford, being about this time returned from Tunbridge, and preparing for Devonshire, I went to take my leave of him at Wallingford House; he was packing up pictures, most of which were of hunting wild beasts and vast pieces of bull-baiting, bear-baiting, etc. I found him in his study, and restored to him several papers of state, and others of importance, which he had furnished me with, on engaging me to write the "History of the Holland War," with other private letters of his acknowledgments to my Lord Arlington, who from a private gentleman of a very noble family, but inconsiderable fortune, had advanced him from almost nothing. The first thing was his being in Parliament, then knighted, then made one of the Commissioners of sick and wounded, on which occasion we sat long together; then, on the death of Hugh Pollard, he was made Comptroller of the Household and Privy Councillor, yet still my brother Commissioner; after the death of Lord Fitz-Harding, Treasurer of the Household, he, by letters to Lord Arlington, which that Lord showed me, begged of his Lordship to obtain it for him as the very height of his ambition. These were written with such submissions and professions of his patronage, as I had never seen any more acknowledging. The Earl of Southampton then dying, he was made one of the Commissioners of the Treasury. His Majesty inclining to put it into one hand, my Lord Clifford, under pretense of making all his interest for his patron, my Lord Arlington, cut the grass under his feet, and procured it for himself, assuring the King that Lord Arlington did not desire it. Indeed, my Lord Arlington protested to me that his confidence in Lord Clifford made him so remiss and his affection to him was so particular, that he was absolutely minded to devolve it on Lord Clifford, all the world knowing how he himself affected ease and quiet, now growing into years, yet little thinking of this go-by. This was the great ingratitude Lord Clifford showed, keeping my Lord Arlington in ignorance, continually assuring him he was pursuing his interest, which was the Duke's into whose great favor Lord Clifford was now gotten; but which certainly cost him the loss[Pg 92] of all, namely, his going so irrevocably far in his interest.
18th August, 1673. My Lord Clifford, having just returned from Tunbridge and getting ready for Devonshire, I went to say goodbye at Wallingford House; he was packing up paintings, most of which depicted hunting wild animals and large scenes of bull-baiting, bear-baiting, and so on. I found him in his study, where I returned several important state papers and other documents he had given me when he asked me to write the "History of the Holland War," along with some private letters in which he thanked my Lord Arlington. Arlington, who was a private gentleman from a noble family but with little fortune, had helped him rise from almost nothing. The first step was his election to Parliament, then he was knighted, and later made one of the Commissioners for the sick and wounded. We spent a long time discussing that. Then, after Hugh Pollard's death, he became Comptroller of the Household and a Privy Councillor, yet still my brother Commissioner. Following Lord Fitz-Harding's death, who was Treasurer of the Household, he wrote to Lord Arlington asking him to help him get that position, which he considered the peak of his ambition. These letters were filled with such humble acknowledgments and displays of loyalty that I had never seen before. When the Earl of Southampton died, he became one of the Commissioners of the Treasury. The King wanted to consolidate this role into one person's hands, and under the guise of advocating for his patron, Lord Arlington, my Lord Clifford undermined him and secured the position for himself, assuring the King that Lord Arlington didn't want it. In fact, Lord Arlington later told me that his trust in Lord Clifford made him careless, and his particular affection for him made him intent on passing it on to Lord Clifford, everyone knowing how much he valued peace and quiet as he grew older, yet he was completely unaware of this betrayal. This was a huge act of ingratitude from Lord Clifford, keeping my Lord Arlington in the dark, constantly claiming he was advancing his interests, which were the Duke's, whose favor Lord Clifford had now gained; but that pursuit definitely led to his downfall, mainly because he went too far in his ambitions.
For the rest, my Lord Clifford was a valiant, incorrupt gentleman, ambitious, not covetous; generous, passionate, a most constant, sincere friend, to me in particular, so as when he laid down his office, I was at the end of all my hopes and endeavors. These were not for high matters, but to obtain what his Majesty was really indebted to my father-in-law, which was the utmost of my ambition, and which I had undoubtedly obtained, if this friend had stood. Sir Thomas Osborn, who succeeded him, though much more obliged to my father-in-law and his family, and my long and old acquaintance, being of a more haughty and far less obliging nature, I could hope for little; a man of excellent natural parts; but nothing of generous or grateful.
For the rest, my Lord Clifford was a brave, honest gentleman, ambitious but not greedy; generous, passionate, and a truly loyal friend to me in particular. When he stepped down from his position, I felt like I had lost all hope and chances. My goals weren't lofty; I just wanted to claim what his Majesty owed to my father-in-law, which was my biggest ambition, and I would have definitely secured it if this friend had stayed. Sir Thomas Osborn, who took over, was even more indebted to my father-in-law and his family, and he was an old friend of mine, but he was much more arrogant and less accommodating. I didn't expect much from him. He was a man of great natural talent, but he had no sense of generosity or gratitude.
Taking leave of my Lord Clifford, he wrung me by the hand, and, looking earnestly on me, bid me God-b'ye, adding, "Mr. Evelyn, I shall never see thee more." "No!" said I, "my Lord, what's the meaning of this? I hope I shall see you often, and as great a person again." "No, Mr. Evelyn, do not expect it, I will never see this place, this city, or Court again," or words of this sound. In this manner, not without almost mutual tears, I parted from him; nor was it long after, but the news was that he was dead, and I have heard from some who I believe knew, he made himself away, after an extraordinary melancholy. This is not confidently affirmed, but a servant who lived in the house, and afterward with Sir Robert Clayton, Lord Mayor, did, as well as others, report it, and when I hinted some such thing to Mr. Prideaux, one of his trustees, he was not willing to enter into that discourse.
Taking leave of Lord Clifford, he shook my hand and, looking at me intently, said goodbye, adding, "Mr. Evelyn, I will never see you again." "No!" I replied, "My Lord, what do you mean by this? I hope to see you often and in great position again." "No, Mr. Evelyn, don’t expect it. I will never see this place, this city, or the Court again," or something along those lines. In this way, not without nearly shedding tears, I parted from him. It wasn’t long after that I heard the news of his death, and from some people I believe knew, I learned he took his own life after a deep depression. This isn’t something I confidently affirm, but a servant who lived in the house and later with Sir Robert Clayton, the Lord Mayor, along with others, reported it. When I mentioned something like this to Mr. Prideaux, one of his trustees, he was reluctant to discuss it.
It was reported with these particulars, that, causing his servant to leave him unusually one morning, locking himself in, he strangled himself with his cravat upon the bed-tester; his servant, not liking the manner of dismissing him, and looking through the keyhole (as I remember), and seeing his master hanging, broke in before he was quite dead, and taking him down, vomiting a great deal of blood, he was heard to utter these words: "Well; let men say what they will, there is a God, a just God above"; after which he spoke no more. This, if true, is dismal. Really, he was the chief occasion of[Pg 93] the Dutch war, and of all that blood which was lost at Bergen in attacking the Smyrna fleet, and that whole quarrel.
It was reported that, after sending his servant away unexpectedly one morning and locking himself in, he hanged himself with his cravat on the bedpost. His servant, unhappy with the way he was dismissed, looked through the keyhole (as I remember) and saw his master hanging. He broke in before he was completely dead, and after taking him down, he coughed up a lot of blood. He was heard to say, "Well; let men say what they want, there is a God, a just God above"; after which he said no more. If this is true, it’s tragic. Really, he was the main reason for the Dutch war and all the bloodshed at Bergen during the attack on the Smyrna fleet, along with that whole conflict.
This leads me to call to mind what my Lord Chancellor Shaftesbury affirmed, not to me only, but to all my brethren the Council of Foreign Plantations, when not long after, this accident being mentioned as we were one day sitting in Council, his Lordship told us this remarkable passage: that, being one day discoursing with him when he was only Sir Thomas Clifford, speaking of men's advancement to great charges in the nation, "Well," says he, "my Lord, I shall be one of the greatest men in England. Don't impute what I say either to fancy, or vanity; I am certain that I shall be a mighty man; but it will not last long; I shall not hold it, but die a bloody death." "What," says my Lord, "your horoscope tells you so?" "No matter for that, it will be as I tell you." "Well," says my Lord Chancellor Shaftesbury, "if I were of that opinion, I either would not be a great man, but decline preferment, or prevent my danger."
This reminds me of what my Lord Chancellor Shaftesbury told not just me, but all my fellow members of the Council of Foreign Plantations. One day, while we were sitting in council and discussing a recent incident, he shared this notable story: when he was still Sir Thomas Clifford, he had a conversation where he mentioned that he would become one of the most important men in England. "Well," he said, "I know I’ll be a great man. Don’t think I’m being fanciful or vain; I’m sure I’ll be mighty, but it won’t last long. I won’t keep it, and I’ll die a violent death." "What, your horoscope says that?" my Lord asked. "It doesn’t matter; it will happen as I’ve said." "Well," replied Lord Chancellor Shaftesbury, "if I believed that, I wouldn’t try to become a great man. I’d either avoid seeking power or find a way to protect myself from that fate."
This my Lord affirmed in my hearing before several gentlemen and noblemen sitting in council at Whitehall. And I the rather am confident of it, remembering what Sir Edward Walker (Garter King-at-Arms) had likewise affirmed to me a long time before, even when he was first made a Lord; that carrying his pedigree to Lord Clifford on his being created a peer, and, finding him busy, he bade him go into his study and divert himself there till he was at leisure to discourse with him about some things relating to his family; there lay, said Sir Edward, on his table, his horoscope and nativity calculated, with some writing under it, where he read that he should be advanced to the highest degree in the state that could be conferred upon him, but that he should not long enjoy it, but should die, or expressions to that sense; and I think, (but cannot confidently say) a bloody death. This Sir Edward affirmed both to me and Sir Richard Browne; nor could I forbear to note this extraordinary passage in these memoirs.
This my Lord confirmed in my hearing in front of several gentlemen and noblemen sitting in council at Whitehall. I am more confident about it, recalling what Sir Edward Walker (Garter King-at-Arms) had also told me a long time ago, when he was first made a Lord. He spoke about taking his family history to Lord Clifford when he was made a peer. Finding him busy, he suggested he go into his study and keep himself occupied there until he had time to discuss some matters about his family. There lay, Sir Edward said, on his table, his horoscope and birth chart, along with some writing underneath it, where he read that he would be raised to the highest position in the state that could be granted to him, but that he would not enjoy it for long and would die, or something to that effect; I think (but can’t say for sure) it mentioned a violent death. Sir Edward confirmed this to both me and Sir Richard Browne, and I couldn't help but note this extraordinary incident in these memoirs.
14th September, 1673. Dr. Creighton, son to the late eloquent Bishop of Bath and Wells, preached to the Household on Isaiah, lvii. 8.
14th September, 1673. Dr. Creighton, son of the late eloquent Bishop of Bath and Wells, preached to the Household on Isaiah, lvii. 8.
15th September, 1673. I procured £4,000 of the Lords[Pg 94] of the Treasury, and rectified divers matters about the sick and wounded.
15th September, 1673. I obtained £4,000 from the Lords[Pg 94] of the Treasury and addressed various issues concerning the sick and injured.
16th September, 1673. To Council, about choosing a new Secretary.
16th September, 1673. To the Council, regarding the selection of a new Secretary.
17th September, 1673. I went with some friends to visit Mr. Bernard Grenville, at Abs Court in Surrey; an old house in a pretty park.
17th September, 1673. I went with some friends to visit Mr. Bernard Grenville at Abs Court in Surrey; an old house in a lovely park.
23d September, 1673. I went to see Paradise, a room in Hatton Garden furnished with a representation of all sorts of animals handsomely painted on boards or cloth, and so cut out and made to stand, move, fly, crawl, roar, and make their several cries. The man who showed it, made us laugh heartily at his formal poetry.
23rd September, 1673. I went to see Paradise, a room in Hatton Garden filled with beautifully painted representations of all kinds of animals on boards or cloth, crafted to stand, move, fly, crawl, roar, and make their various sounds. The man who gave us the tour had us laughing out loud with his serious poetry.
15th October, 1673. To Council, and swore in Mr. Locke, secretary, Dr. Worsley being dead.
15th October, 1673. To the Council, and Mr. Locke was sworn in as secretary, Dr. Worsley having passed away.
27th October, 1673. To Council, about sending succors to recover New York: and then we read the commission and instructions to Sir Jonathan Atkins, the new Governor of Barbadoes.
27th October, 1673. To Council, regarding sending support to reclaim New York: and then we reviewed the commission and instructions for Sir Jonathan Atkins, the new Governor of Barbados.
5th November, 1673. This night the youths of the city burned the Pope in effigy, after they had made procession with it in great triumph, they being displeased at the Duke for altering his religion and marrying an Italian lady.
5th November, 1673. Tonight, the young people of the city burned a figure of the Pope in protest after parading it through the streets in celebration. They were upset with the Duke for changing his religion and marrying an Italian woman.
30th November, 1673. On St. Andrew's day I first saw the new Duchess of York, and the Duchess of Modena, her mother.
30th November, 1673. On St. Andrew's Day, I first met the new Duchess of York and her mother, the Duchess of Modena.
1st December, 1673. To Gresham College, whither the city had invited the Royal Society by many of their chief aldermen and magistrates, who gave us a collation, to welcome us to our first place of assembly, from whence we had been driven to give place to the City, on their making it their Exchange on the dreadful conflagration, till their new Exchange was finished, which it now was. The Society having till now been entertained and having met at Arundel House.
1st December, 1673. To Gresham College, where the city had invited the Royal Society through many of their leading aldermen and officials, who treated us to refreshments to welcome us to our first meeting place, from which we had been displaced to make way for the City, as they turned it into their Exchange after the terrible fire, until their new Exchange was completed, which it now was. The Society had been hosted and had met at Arundel House until now.
2d December, 1673. I dined with some friends, and visited the sick; thence, to an almshouse, where was prayers and relief, some very ill and miserable. It was one of the best days I ever spent in my life.
2nd December, 1673. I had lunch with some friends and visited those who were sick; then, I went to an almshouse where there were prayers and assistance, with some people very ill and in distress. It was one of the best days I've ever had in my life.
3d December, 1673. There was at dinner my Lord Lockhart, designed Ambassador for France, a gallant and sober person.[Pg 95]
3rd December, 1673. At dinner was my Lord Lockhart, the appointed Ambassador to France, a brave and composed individual.[Pg 95]
9th December, 1673. I saw again the Italian Duchess and her brother, the Prince Reynaldo.
9th December, 1673. I saw the Italian Duchess and her brother, Prince Reynaldo, again.
20th December, 1673. I had some discourse with certain strangers, not unlearned, who had been born not far from Old Nineveh; they assured me of the ruins being still extant, and vast and wonderful were the buildings, vaults, pillars, and magnificent fragments;34 but they could say little of the Tower of Babel that satisfied me. But the description of the amenity and fragrancy of the country for health and cheerfulness, delighted me; so sensibly they spoke of the excellent air and climate in respect of our cloudy and splenetic country.
20th December, 1673. I had a conversation with some knowledgeable strangers who were born not far from Old Nineveh. They assured me that the ruins still exist, and the buildings, vaults, pillars, and magnificent fragments are vast and amazing; 34 but they couldn't provide much information about the Tower of Babel that satisfied me. However, their description of the beauty and fragrance of the country, which is great for health and happiness, pleased me; they spoke so clearly about the excellent air and climate compared to our cloudy and gloomy country.
24th December, 1673. Visited the prisoners at Ludgate, taking orders about the releasing of some.
24th December, 1673. Visited the prisoners at Ludgate, getting instructions on the release of some.
30th December, 1673. I gave Almighty God thanks for his infinite goodness to me the year past, and begged his mercy and protection the year following; afterward, invited my neighbors to spend the day with me.
30th December, 1673. I thanked God for his endless kindness to me over the past year and asked for his mercy and protection for the year ahead; afterwards, I invited my neighbors to spend the day with me.
5th January, 1673-74. I saw an Italian opera in music, the first that had been in England of this kind.
5th January, 1673-74. I attended an Italian opera, the first of its kind in England.
9th January, 1674. Sent for by his Majesty to write something against the Hollanders about the duty of the Flag and Fishery. Returned with some papers.
9th January, 1674. Called by his Majesty to write something against the Dutch regarding the duties of the Flag and Fishing. Came back with some documents.
25th March, 1674. I dined at Knightsbridge, with the Bishops of Salisbury, Chester, and Lincoln, my old friends.
25th March, 1674. I had dinner at Knightsbridge with the Bishops of Salisbury, Chester, and Lincoln, my old friends.
29th May, 1674. His Majesty's birthday and Restoration. Mr. Demalhoy, Roger L'Estrange, and several of my friends, came to dine with me on the happy occasion.
29th May, 1674. His Majesty's birthday and Restoration. Mr. Demalhoy, Roger L'Estrange, and several of my friends came over to have dinner with me to celebrate the happy occasion.
27th June, 1674. Mr. Dryden, the famous poet and now laureate, came to give me a visit. It was the anniversary of my marriage, and the first day I went into my new little cell and cabinet, which I built below toward the south court, at the east end of the parlor.
27th June, 1674. Mr. Dryden, the famous poet and now laureate, came to visit me. It was the anniversary of my marriage and the first day I moved into my new little room and office, which I built below toward the south courtyard, at the east end of the parlor.
9th July, 1674. Paid £360 for purchase of Dr. Jacombe's son's share in the mill and land at Deptford, which I bought of the Beechers.
9th July, 1674. Paid £360 for the purchase of Dr. Jacombe's son's share in the mill and land at Deptford, which I bought from the Beechers.
22d July, 1674. I went to Windsor with my wife and son to see my daughter Mary, who was there with my Lady Tuke and to do my duty to his Majesty. Next day, to a great entertainment at Sir Robert Holmes's at[Pg 96] Cranbourne Lodge, in the Forest; there were his Majesty, the Queen, Duke, Duchess, and all the Court. I returned in the evening with Sir Joseph Williamson, now declared Secretary of State. He was son of a poor clergyman somewhere in Cumberland, brought up at Queen's College, Oxford, of which he came to be a fellow; then traveled with ... and returning when the King was restored, was received as a clerk under Mr. Secretary Nicholas. Sir Henry Bennett (now Lord Arlington) succeeding, Williamson is transferred to him, who loving his ease more than business (though sufficiently able had he applied himself to it) remitted all to his man Williamson; and, in a short time, let him so into the secret of affairs, that (as his Lordship himself told me) there was a kind of necessity to advance him; and so, by his subtlety, dexterity, and insinuation, he got now to be principal Secretary; absolutely Lord Arlington's creature, and ungrateful enough. It has been the fate of this obliging favorite to advance those who soon forgot their original. Sir Joseph was a musician, could play at Jeu de Goblets, exceedingly formal, a severe master to his servants, but so inward with my Lord O'Brien, that after a few months of that gentleman's death, he married his widow,35 who, being sister and heir of the Duke of Richmond, brought him a noble fortune. It was thought they lived not so kindly after marriage as they did before. She was much censured for marrying so meanly, being herself allied to the Royal family.
22nd July, 1674. I went to Windsor with my wife and son to visit my daughter Mary, who was staying with Lady Tuke, and to pay my respects to the King. The next day, I attended a grand event at Sir Robert Holmes's at[Pg 96] Cranbourne Lodge, in the Forest; there were the King, the Queen, the Duke, the Duchess, and all the Court. I returned in the evening with Sir Joseph Williamson, who was recently appointed Secretary of State. He was the son of a poor clergyman from somewhere in Cumberland, educated at Queen's College, Oxford, where he became a fellow; then he traveled with ... and, upon returning when the King was restored, began working as a clerk under Mr. Secretary Nicholas. When Sir Henry Bennett (now Lord Arlington) took over, Williamson was transferred to him, who preferred comfort over work (though he was capable if he had focused on it) and left most matters to Williamson. In a short time, he let Williamson into the details of affairs so much that (as his Lordship himself told me) it became necessary to promote him; and so, through his cleverness, skill, and charm, he became the principal Secretary, absolutely dependent on Lord Arlington and rather ungrateful. It has been the fate of this helpful favorite to elevate those who soon forget their beginnings. Sir Joseph was a musician, skilled at Jeu de Goblets, very formal, a strict master to his servants, but so close with my Lord O'Brien that shortly after that gentleman's death, he married his widow,35 who, being the sister and heir of the Duke of Richmond, brought him a considerable fortune. It was said they didn't get along as well after marriage as they had before. She faced much criticism for marrying someone so lowly, given her connection to the Royal family.
6th August, 1674. I went to Groombridge, to see my old friend, Mr. Packer; the house built within a moat, in a woody valley. The old house had been the place of confinement of the Duke of Orleans, taken by one Waller (whose house it then was) at the battle of Agincourt, now demolished, and a new one built in its place, though a far better situation had been on the south of the wood, on a graceful ascent. At some small distance, is a large[Pg 97] chapel, not long since built by Mr. Packer's father, on a vow he made to do it on the return of King Charles I. out of Spain, 1625, and dedicated to St. Charles, but what saint there was then of that name I am to seek, for, being a Protestant, I conceive it was not Borromeo.
6th August, 1674. I went to Groombridge to visit my old friend, Mr. Packer. The house was built within a moat, in a wooded valley. The old house had been where the Duke of Orleans was held captive, taken by someone named Waller (who owned it at the time) during the battle of Agincourt. It’s now been torn down, and a new one built in its place, although a much better location would have been on the south side of the woods, on a gentle slope. Not far away is a large [Pg 97] chapel, built not long ago by Mr. Packer's father, as a promise he made when King Charles I returned from Spain in 1625, and dedicated to St. Charles. However, I’m not sure which saint that was at the time, because as a Protestant, I don’t believe it was Borromeo.
I went to see my farm at Ripe, near Lewes.
I went to check out my farm at Ripe, close to Lewes.
19th August, 1674. His Majesty told me how exceedingly the Dutch were displeased at my treatise of the "History of Commerce;" that the Holland Ambassador had complained to him of what I had touched of the Flags and Fishery, etc., and desired the book might be called in; while on the other side, he assured me he was exceedingly pleased with what I had done, and gave me many thanks. However, it being just upon conclusion of the treaty of Breda (indeed it was designed to have been published some months before and when we were at defiance), his Majesty told me he must recall it formally; but gave order that what copies should be publicly seized to pacify the Ambassador, should immediately be restored to the printer, and that neither he nor the vender should be molested. The truth is, that which touched the Hollander was much less than what the King himself furnished me with, and obliged me to publish, having caused it to be read to him before it went to press; but the error was, it should have been published before the peace was proclaimed. The noise of this book's suppression made it presently to be bought up, and turned much to the stationer's advantage. It was no other than the preface prepared to be prefixed to my "History of the Whole War;" which I now pursued no further.
19th August, 1674. The King told me how very upset the Dutch were about my book "History of Commerce;" that the Dutch Ambassador had complained to him about what I wrote regarding the Flags and Fisheries, and asked for the book to be banned. However, he reassured me that he was really pleased with what I'd done and thanked me multiple times. Since it was just around the time of the treaty of Breda (it was actually meant to be published a few months earlier when we were still at odds), the King said he had to formally recall it; but he ordered that any copies seized publicly to appease the Ambassador should be immediately returned to the printer, and that neither he nor the seller should be bothered. The truth is, what bothered the Dutch was much less than what the King himself provided me with and insisted I publish, having made it be read to him before it went to print; but the mistake was that it should have been published before peace was declared. The uproar over the book's suppression caused it to be quickly bought up, which greatly benefited the stationer. It was nothing more than the preface I had prepared to include with my "History of the Whole War;" which I decided not to pursue any further.
21st August, 1674. In one of the meadows at the foot of the long Terrace below the Castle [Windsor], works were thrown up to show the King a representation of the city of Maestricht, newly taken by the French. Bastians, bulwarks, ramparts, palisadoes, graffs, horn-works, counter-scarps, etc., were constructed. It was attacked by the Duke of Monmouth (newly come from the real siege) and the Duke of York, with a little army, to show their skill in tactics. On Saturday night they made their approaches, opened trenches, raised batteries, took the counter-scarp and ravelin, after a stout defense; great guns fired on both sides, grenadoes shot, mines sprung, parties sent out, attempts of rais[Pg 98]ing the siege, prisoners taken, parleys; and, in short, all the circumstances of a formal siege, to appearance, and, what is most strange all without disorder, or ill accident, to the great satisfaction of a thousand spectators. Being night, it made a formidable show. The siege being over, I went with Mr. Pepys back to London, where we arrived about three in the morning.
21st August, 1674. In one of the meadows at the foot of the long terrace below Windsor Castle, works were set up to give the King a view of the city of Maestricht, which had just been captured by the French. Bastions, walls, ramparts, wooden defenses, ditches, horn-works, counter-scarps, etc., were built. It was attacked by the Duke of Monmouth (who had just returned from the actual siege) and the Duke of York, with a small army, to showcase their tactical skills. On Saturday night, they advanced, dug trenches, set up artillery, captured the counter-scarp and ravelin after a strong defense; big guns fired from both sides, grenades were launched, mines detonated, teams were sent out, attempts to lift the siege occurred, prisoners were taken, negotiations happened; and, in short, all the elements of a formal siege were on display, and what was most remarkable was that it all happened without disorder or accidents, much to the delight of a thousand spectators. Being night, it created a striking scene. Once the siege was over, I went back to London with Mr. Pepys, where we arrived around three in the morning.
15th September, 1674. To Council, about fetching away the English left at Surinam, etc., since our reconciliation with Holland.
15th September, 1674. To Council, regarding the retrieval of the English who remained in Surinam, etc., following our reconciliation with Holland.
21st September, 1674. I went to see the great loss that Lord Arlington had sustained by fire at Goring House, this night consumed to the ground, with exceeding loss of hangings, plate, rare pictures, and cabinets; hardly anything was saved of the best and most princely furniture that any subject had in England. My lord and lady were both absent at the Bath.
21st September, 1674. I went to see the significant damage that Lord Arlington suffered from a fire at Goring House, which was completely destroyed overnight, resulting in a tremendous loss of tapestries, silverware, rare paintings, and cabinets; barely anything was saved of the finest and most luxurious furniture that any individual possessed in England. My lord and lady were both away in Bath.
6th October, 1674. The Lord Chief Baron Turner, and Sergeant Wild, Recorder of London, came to visit me.
6th October, 1674. The Lord Chief Baron Turner and Sergeant Wild, Recorder of London, came to see me.
20th October, 1674. At Lord Berkeley's, I discoursed with Sir Thomas Modiford, late Governor of Jamaica, and with Colonel Morgan, who undertook that gallant exploit from Nombre de Dios to Panama, on the Continent of America; he told me 10,000 men would easily conquer all the Spanish Indies, they were so secure. They took great booty, and much greater had been taken, had they not been betrayed and so discovered before their approach, by which the Spaniards had time to carry their vast treasure on board ships that put off to sea in sight of our men, who had no boats to follow. They set fire to Panama, and ravaged the country sixty miles about. The Spaniards were so supine and unexercised, that they were afraid to fire a great gun.
20th October, 1674. At Lord Berkeley's, I talked with Sir Thomas Modiford, the former Governor of Jamaica, and Colonel Morgan, who led that daring mission from Nombre de Dios to Panama on the American mainland. He mentioned that 10,000 men could easily conquer all the Spanish Indies because they were so complacent. They seized a lot of loot, and even more would have been taken if they hadn't been betrayed and discovered before they arrived, which gave the Spaniards time to load their immense treasure onto ships that sailed away right in front of our men, who had no boats to pursue them. They set fire to Panama and devastated the surrounding area for sixty miles. The Spaniards were so lazy and untrained that they were afraid to fire a big cannon.
31st October, 1674. My birthday, 54th year of my life. Blessed be God! It was also preparation day for the Holy Sacrament, in which I participated the next day, imploring God's protection for the year following, and confirming my resolutions of a more holy life, even upon the Holy Book. The Lord assist and be gracious unto me! Amen.
31st October, 1674. My birthday, 54th year of my life. Blessed be God! It was also preparation day for the Holy Sacrament, in which I participated the next day, asking for God's protection for the coming year and committing to a more holy life, even upon the Holy Book. The Lord assist and be gracious to me! Amen.
15th November, 1674. The anniversary of my baptism: I first heard that famous and excellent preacher, Dr. Burnet, author of the "History of the Reformation" on Colossians iii. 10, with such flow of eloquence and fullness[Pg 99] of matter, as showed him to be a person o£ extraordinary parts.
15th November, 1674. The anniversary of my baptism: I first heard that famous and great preacher, Dr. Burnet, author of the "History of the Reformation," on Colossians iii. 10, with such a flow of eloquence and richness of content, that it revealed him to be an extraordinary person.
Being her Majesty's birthday, the Court was exceeding splendid in clothes and jewels, to the height of excess.
Being Her Majesty's birthday, the Court was extremely lavish in clothing and jewelry, to the point of extravagance.
17th November, 1674. To Council, on the business of Surinam, where the Dutch had detained some English in prison, ever since the first war, 1665.
17th November, 1674. To Council, regarding the situation in Surinam, where the Dutch have kept some English people in prison since the first war in 1665.
19th November, 1674. I heard that stupendous violin, Signor Nicholao (with other rare musicians), whom I never heard mortal man exceed on that instrument. He had a stroke so sweet, and made it speak like the voice of a man, and, when he pleased, like a concert of several instruments. He did wonders upon a note, and was an excellent composer. Here was also that rare lutanist, Dr. Wallgrave; but nothing approached the violin in Nicholao's hand. He played such ravishing things as astonished us all.
19th November, 1674. I heard this incredible violinist, Signor Nicholao, along with other amazing musicians, and I've never heard anyone play that instrument better. His playing was so smooth, it made the violin sound like a human voice, and at times, it felt like an entire orchestra. He did amazing things with a single note and was a fantastic composer. There was also the talented lutenist, Dr. Wallgrave, but nothing compared to the violin in Nicholao's hands. He played such beautiful pieces that amazed us all.
2d December, 1674. At Mr. Slingsby's, master of the mint, my worthy friend, a great lover of music. Heard Signor Francisco on the harpsichord, esteemed one of the most excellent masters in Europe on that instrument; then, came Nicholao with his violin, and struck all mute, but Mrs. Knight, who sung incomparably, and doubtless has the greatest reach of any English woman; she had been lately roaming in Italy, and was much improved in that quality.
2nd December, 1674. At Mr. Slingsby’s, the master of the mint and my good friend, who really loves music. I listened to Signor Francisco on the harpsichord, considered one of the best masters of that instrument in Europe; then Nicholao came with his violin and left everyone speechless, except Mrs. Knight, who sang incredibly well and certainly has the greatest range of any English woman; she had recently traveled in Italy and had significantly improved in that aspect.
15th December, 1674. Saw a comedy at night, at Court, acted by the ladies only, among them Lady Mary and Ann, his Royal Highness' two daughters, and my dear friend Mrs. Blagg, who, having the principal part, performed it to admiration. They were all covered with jewels.
15th December, 1674. I watched a comedy at night, at Court, performed exclusively by the ladies, including Lady Mary and Ann, the two daughters of His Royal Highness, and my good friend Mrs. Blagg, who played the lead role and did an amazing job. They were all adorned with jewels.
22d December, 1674. Was at the repetition of the "Pastoral," on which occasion Mrs. Blagg had about her near £20,000 worth of jewels, of which she lost one worth about £80, borrowed of the Countess of Suffolk. The press was so great, that it is a wonder she lost no more. The Duke made it good.
22nd December, 1674. I attended the performance of the "Pastoral," where Mrs. Blagg had close to £20,000 in jewels, of which she lost one valued at about £80, borrowed from the Countess of Suffolk. The crowd was so large that it's surprising she didn't lose more. The Duke covered the loss.
20th January, 1674-75. Went to see Mr. Streeter, that excellent painter of perspective and landscape, to comfort and encourage him to be cut for the stone, with which that honest man was exceedingly afflicted.
20th January, 1674-75. Went to see Mr. Streeter, that excellent painter of perspective and landscape, to comfort and encourage him to undergo surgery for the stone, with which that honest man was greatly suffering.
22d March, 1675. Supped at Sir William Petty's, with the Bishop of Salisbury, and divers honorable persons.[Pg 100] We had a noble entertainment in a house gloriously furnished; the master and mistress of it were extraordinary persons. Sir William was the son of a mean man somewhere in Sussex, and sent from school to Oxford, where he studied Philosophy, but was most eminent in Mathematics and Mechanics; proceeded Doctor of Physic, and was grown famous, as for his learning so for his recovering a poor wench that had been hanged for felony; and her body having been begged (as the custom is) for the anatomy lecture, he bled her, put her to bed to a warm woman, and, with spirits and other means, restored her to life. The young scholars joined and made a little portion, and married her to a man who had several children by her, she living fifteen years after, as I have been assured. Sir William came from Oxford to be tutor to a neighbor of mine; thence, when the rebels were dividing their conquests in Ireland, he was employed by them to measure and set out the land, which he did on an easy contract, so much per acre. This he effected so exactly, that it not only furnished him with a great sum of money; but enabled him to purchase an estate worth £4,000 a year. He afterward married the daughter of Sir Hardress Waller; she was an extraordinary wit as well as beauty, and a prudent woman.
22nd March, 1675. Had dinner at Sir William Petty's with the Bishop of Salisbury and several distinguished guests.[Pg 100] We enjoyed a magnificent meal in a beautifully furnished home; the hosts were remarkable individuals. Sir William was the son of a humble man from somewhere in Sussex and was sent to school at Oxford, where he studied Philosophy but excelled mainly in Mathematics and Mechanics. He earned a Doctorate in Medicine and became well-known, not just for his knowledge but also for bringing a young woman back to life after she had been hanged for theft. After her body was requested (as was customary) for an anatomy lecture, he bled her, placed her in bed with a warm woman, and, using various means, revived her. The young scholars pooled together some money and married her off to a man by whom she had several children, and she lived another fifteen years, as I've been told. Sir William moved from Oxford to become a tutor to a neighbor of mine; then, when the rebels were splitting their gains in Ireland, he was hired to measure and divide the land, which he did for a set fee per acre. He executed this task so accurately that it not only gave him a significant amount of money but also allowed him to purchase an estate worth £4,000 a year. Later, he married the daughter of Sir Hardress Waller; she was known for her intelligence as well as her beauty, and she was a wise woman.
Sir William, among other inventions, was author of the double-bottomed ship, which perished, and he was censured for rashness, being lost in the Bay of Biscay in a storm, when, I think, fifteen other vessels miscarried. This vessel was flat-bottomed, of exceeding use to put into shallow ports, and ride over small depths of water. It consisted of two distinct keels cramped together with huge timbers, etc., so as that a violent stream ran between; it bore a monstrous broad sail, and he still persists that it is practicable, and of exceeding use; and he has often told me he would adventure himself in such another, could he procure sailors, and his Majesty's permission to make a second Experiment; which name the King gave the vessel at the launching.
Sir William, among other inventions, created the double-bottomed ship, which ended up sinking, and he was criticized for being reckless, as it was lost in a storm in the Bay of Biscay, where, I believe, fifteen other ships also failed. This vessel had a flat bottom, which was very useful for entering shallow ports and navigating in small depths of water. It was made of two separate keels held together with large timbers, allowing a strong current to flow between them; it had an enormous broad sail. He still insists that it is feasible and extremely useful; he has often mentioned that he would take the risk to sail in a similar ship if he could find sailors and get permission from his Majesty to conduct a second trial, which is what the King named the ship at its launch.
The Map of Ireland made by Sir William Petty is believed to be the most exact that ever yet was made of any country. He did promise to publish it; and I am told it has cost him near £1,000 to have it engraved at[Pg 101] Amsterdam. There is not a better Latin poet living, when he gives himself that diversion; nor is his excellence less in Council and prudent matters of state; but he is so exceedingly nice in sifting and examining all possible contingencies, that he adventures at nothing which is not demonstration. There was not in the whole world his equal for a superintendent of manufacture and improvement of trade, or to govern a plantation. If I were a Prince, I should make him my second Counsellor, at least. There is nothing difficult to him. He is, besides, courageous; on which account, I cannot but note a true story of him, that when Sir Aleyn Brodrick sent him a challenge upon a difference between them in Ireland, Sir William, though exceedingly purblind, accepted the challenge, and it being his part to propound the weapon, desired his antagonist to meet him with a hatchet, or axe, in a dark cellar; which the other, of course, refused.
The Map of Ireland created by Sir William Petty is considered the most accurate map ever made of any country. He promised to publish it, and I've heard it cost him almost £1,000 to have it engraved at[Pg 101] Amsterdam. There isn’t a better Latin poet alive when he takes the time for it, and he’s just as skilled in council and wise state matters. However, he’s extremely meticulous in analyzing all possible outcomes, so he only takes risks when there’s clear proof. No one in the world is his equal when it comes to managing manufacturing and improving trade, or governing a colony. If I were a Prince, I would make him my second Counselor, at the very least. Nothing is too difficult for him. Plus, he’s brave; which is why I have to mention a true story about him. When Sir Aleyn Brodrick sent him a challenge over a disagreement in Ireland, Sir William, although quite short-sighted, accepted the challenge. He suggested that they meet in a dark cellar with a hatchet or axe, which of course, the other man refused.
Sir William was, with all this, facetious and of easy conversation, friendly and courteous, and had such a faculty of imitating others, that he would take a text and preach, now like a grave orthodox divine, then falling into the Presbyterian way, then to the fanatical, the Quaker, the monk and friar, the Popish priest, with such admirable action, and alteration of voice and tone, as it was not possible to abstain from wonder, and one would swear to hear several persons, or forbear to think he was not in good earnest an enthusiast and almost beside himself; then, he would fall out of it into a serious discourse; but it was very rarely he would be prevailed on to oblige the company with this faculty, and that only among most intimate friends. My Lord Duke of Ormond once obtained it of him, and was almost ravished with admiration; but by and by, he fell upon a serious reprimand of the faults and miscarriages of some Princes and Governors, which, though he named none, did so sensibly touch the Duke, who was then Lieutenant of Ireland, that he began to be very uneasy, and wished the spirit laid which he had raised, for he was neither able to endure such truths, nor could he but be delighted. At last, he melted his discourse to a ridiculous subject, and came down from the joint stool on which he had stood; but my lord would not have him preach any more. He never[Pg 102] could get favor at Court, because he outwitted all the projectors that came near him. Having never known such another genius, I cannot but mention these particulars, among a multitude of others which I could produce. When I, who knew him in mean circumstances, have been in his splendid palace, he would himself be in admiration how he arrived at it; nor was it his value or inclination for splendid furniture and the curiosities of the age, but his elegant lady could endure nothing mean, or that was not magnificent. He was very negligent himself, and rather so of his person, and of a philosophic temper. "What a to-do is here!" would he say, "I can lie in straw with as much satisfaction."
Sir William was, despite all this, playful and easy to talk to, friendly and polite, and had such a knack for mimicking others that he could take a topic and present it, first like a serious orthodox preacher, then switching to a Presbyterian style, then to a fanatic, a Quaker, a monk and friar, a Catholic priest, with such impressive gestures and changes in voice and tone that it was impossible not to be amazed. One would think he was several people or might even believe he was genuinely passionate and almost out of his mind; then he would shift to a serious discussion. However, he rarely agreed to showcase this talent and only did so among his closest friends. My Lord Duke of Ormond once managed to get him to perform and was nearly overwhelmed with admiration; but soon after, Sir William began to deliver a serious critique of the flaws and failures of some princes and governors, which, although he didn’t name anyone, struck the Duke—who was then the Lieutenant of Ireland—so acutely that he became quite uncomfortable and wished for the spirit he had raised to be quelled, as he couldn't stand such truths yet couldn't help being pleased by them. Eventually, he transitioned to a ridiculous topic and stepped down from the stool he had been standing on; but my lord wouldn’t allow him to preach any longer. He never could gain favor at Court because he outsmarted all the schemers who approached him. Having never encountered another mind quite like his, I feel compelled to mention these details, among many others I could share. When I, who knew him in humble circumstances, visited his grand palace, he himself would marvel at how he achieved it; it wasn't due to his taste or desire for luxurious furniture and contemporary curiosities, but because his elegant wife could tolerate nothing less than magnificent. He was very careless about his own appearance and had a philosophical attitude. "What a fuss is this!" he would say, "I can lie in straw with just as much satisfaction."
He is author of the ingenious deductions from the bills of mortality, which go under the name of Mr. Graunt; also of that useful discourse of the manufacture of wool, and several others in the register of the Royal Society. He was also author of that paraphrase on the 104th Psalm in Latin verse, which goes about in MS., and is inimitable. In a word, there is nothing impenetrable to him.
He is the author of the clever analyses of the mortality statistics known as Mr. Graunt; he also wrote the helpful discussion on wool manufacturing, along with several other works in the Royal Society's records. He wrote a paraphrase of the 104th Psalm in Latin verse that circulates in manuscript form and is unparalleled. In short, nothing is beyond his understanding.
26th March, 1675. Dr. Brideoak was elected Bishop of Chichester, on the translation of Dr. Gunning to Ely.
26th March, 1675. Dr. Brideoak was chosen as Bishop of Chichester when Dr. Gunning was moved to Ely.
30th March, 1675. Dr. Allestree preached on Romans, vi. 3, the necessity of those who are baptized to die to sin; a very excellent discourse from an excellent preacher.
30th March, 1675. Dr. Allestree preached on Romans, vi. 3, the importance of being baptized and dying to sin; an outstanding sermon from a remarkable preacher.
29th April, 1675. I read my first discourse, "Of Earth and Vegetation," before the Royal Society as a lecture in course, after Sir Robert Southwell had read his, the week before, "On Water." I was commanded by our President and the suffrage of the Society, to print it.
29th April, 1675. I presented my first lecture, "Of Earth and Vegetation," to the Royal Society following Sir Robert Southwell's lecture, "On Water," the previous week. The President and the Society requested me to publish it.
16th May, 1675. This day was my dear friend, Mrs. Blagg, married at the Temple Church to my friend, Mr. Sidney Godolphin, Groom of the Bedchamber to his Majesty.
16th May, 1675. Today, my dear friend, Mrs. Blagg, got married at the Temple Church to my friend, Mr. Sidney Godolphin, Groom of the Bedchamber to his Majesty.
18th May, 1675. I went to visit one Mr. Bathurst, a Spanish merchant, my neighbor.
18th May, 1675. I went to visit Mr. Bathurst, a Spanish merchant and my neighbor.
31st May, 1675. I went with Lord Ossory to Dept[Pg 103]ford, where we chose him Master of the Trinity Company.
31st May, 1675. I went with Lord Ossory to Dept[Pg 103]ford, where we appointed him Master of the Trinity Company.
2d June, 1675. I was at a conference of the Lords and Commons in the Painted Chamber, on a difference about imprisoning some of their members; and on the 3d, at another conference, when the Lords accused the Commons for their transcendent misbehavior, breach of privilege, Magna Charta, subversion of government, and other high, provoking, and diminishing expressions, showing what duties and subjection they owed to the Lords in Parliament, by record of Henry IV. This was likely to create a notable disturbance.
2nd June, 1675. I attended a meeting with the Lords and Commons in the Painted Chamber, discussing the issue of imprisoning some of their members. On the 3rd, at another meeting, the Lords accused the Commons of their outrageous behavior, violating privileges, breaching Magna Carta, undermining the government, and using other serious and inflammatory language, highlighting the responsibilities and respect they owed to the Lords in Parliament, as noted in the records of Henry IV. This was set to cause a significant uproar.
15th June, 1675. This afternoon came Monsieur Querouaille and his lady, parents to the famous beauty and ... favorite at Court, to see Sir R. Browne, with whom they were intimately acquainted in Bretagne, at the time Sir Richard was sent to Brest to supervise his Majesty's sea affairs, during the latter part of the King's banishment. This gentleman's house was not a mile from Brest; Sir Richard made an acquaintance there, and, being used very civilly, was obliged to return it here, which we did. He seemed a soldierly person and a good fellow, as the Bretons generally are; his lady had been very handsome, and seemed a shrewd understanding woman. Conversing with him in our garden, I found several words of the Breton language the same with our Welsh. His daughter was now made Duchess of Portsmouth, and in the height of favor; but he never made any use of it.
15th June, 1675. This afternoon, Monsieur Querouaille and his wife, the parents of the famous beauty and favorite at Court, came to see Sir R. Browne, with whom they were close friends in Brittany when Sir Richard was sent to Brest to oversee the King's maritime affairs during the later part of his exile. This gentleman lived less than a mile from Brest; Sir Richard met him there and, having been treated very kindly, felt it was only right to return the gesture here, which we did. He appeared to be a soldierly person and a decent guy, as Bretons usually are; his wife had been very attractive and seemed to be a sharp and insightful woman. While chatting with him in our garden, I found several words in the Breton language that were the same as in our Welsh. His daughter had recently become the Duchess of Portsmouth and was at the height of her favor, but he never took advantage of it.
27th June, 1675. At Ely House, I went to the consecration of my worthy friend, the learned Dr. Barlow, Warden of Queen's College, Oxford, now made Bishop of Lincoln. After it succeeded a magnificent feast, where were the Duke of Ormond, Earl of Lauderdale, the Lord Treasurer, Lord Keeper, etc.
27th June, 1675. At Ely House, I attended the consecration of my esteemed friend, the knowledgeable Dr. Barlow, Warden of Queen's College, Oxford, who has now become Bishop of Lincoln. Following the ceremony, there was an extravagant feast, which included the Duke of Ormond, Earl of Lauderdale, the Lord Treasurer, the Lord Keeper, and others.
8th July, 1675. I went with Mrs. Howard and her two daughters toward Northampton Assizes, about a trial at law, in which I was concerned for them as a trustee. We lay this night at Henley-on-the Thames, at our attorney, Mr. Stephens's, who entertained us very handsomely. Next day, dining at Shotover, at Sir Timothy Tyrill's, a sweet place, we lay at Oxford, where it was the time of the Act. Mr. Robert Spencer, uncle to the[Pg 104] Earl of Sunderland, and my old acquaintance in France, entertained us at his apartment in Christ Church with exceeding generosity.
8th July, 1675. I traveled with Mrs. Howard and her two daughters towards the Northampton Assizes for a legal case I was involved in as their trustee. We spent the night at Henley-on-the-Thames, at our lawyer Mr. Stephens's place, where he hosted us very well. The next day, we had lunch at Shotover at Sir Timothy Tyrill's, a lovely spot, and then stayed overnight in Oxford, where the Act was taking place. Mr. Robert Spencer, the uncle of the Earl of Sunderland and a friend of mine from France, generously hosted us at his residence in Christ Church.
10th July, 1675. The Vice Chancellor Dr. Bathurst (who had formerly taken particular care of my son), President of Trinity College invited me to dinner, and did me great honor all the time of my stay. The next day, he invited me and all my company, though strangers to him, to a very noble feast. I was at all the academic exercises.—Sunday, at St. Mary's, preached a Fellow of Brasen-nose, not a little magnifying the dignity of Churchmen.
10th July, 1675. The Vice Chancellor Dr. Bathurst (who had previously taken special care of my son) and the President of Trinity College invited me to dinner and honored me greatly during my stay. The next day, he invited me and all my guests, even though they were strangers to him, to a splendid feast. I attended all the academic events. On Sunday, at St. Mary's, a Fellow of Brasen-nose preached, significantly highlighting the importance of Church leaders.
11th July, 1675. We heard the speeches, and saw the ceremony of creating doctors in Divinity, Law and Physic. I had, early in the morning, heard Dr. Morison, Botanic Professor, read on divers plants in the Physic Garden; and saw that rare collection of natural curiosities of Dr. Plot's, of Magdalen Hall, author of "The Natural History of Oxfordshire," all of them collected in that shire, and indeed extraordinary, that in one county there should be found such variety of plants, shells, stones, minerals, marcasites, fowls, insects, models of works, crystals, agates, and marbles. He was now intending to visit Staffordshire, and, as he had of Oxfordshire, to give us the natural, topical, political, and mechanical history. Pity it is that more of this industrious man's genius were not employed so to describe every county of England; it would be one of the most useful and illustrious works that was ever produced in any age or nation.
11th July, 1675. We listened to the speeches and witnessed the ceremony for awarding degrees in Theology, Law, and Medicine. Early in the morning, I heard Dr. Morison, the Botany Professor, talk about various plants in the Botanical Garden, and I saw Dr. Plot's amazing collection of natural curiosities from Magdalen Hall, who authored "The Natural History of Oxfordshire." All these specimens were gathered from that county, and it's truly remarkable how much variety can be found in one place—plants, shells, stones, minerals, marcasites, birds, insects, models of artifacts, crystals, agates, and marbles. He was planning to visit Staffordshire next, intending to provide us with the natural, topical, political, and mechanical history just as he did for Oxfordshire. It’s a shame that this hardworking man's talents aren't being used to describe every county in England; such a work would be one of the most valuable and significant contributions ever made in any time or place.
I visited also the Bodleian Library and my old friend, the learned Obadiah Walker, head of University College, which he had now almost rebuilt, or repaired. We then proceeded to Northampton, where we arrived the next day.
I also went to the Bodleian Library and caught up with my old friend, the knowledgeable Obadiah Walker, who was the head of University College, which he had almost completely rebuilt or renovated. We then moved on to Northampton, arriving the next day.
In this journey, went part of the way Mr. James Graham (since Privy Purse to the Duke), a young gentleman exceedingly in love with Mrs. Dorothy Howard, one of the maids of honor in our company. I could not but pity them both, the mother not much favoring it. This lady was not only a great beauty, but a most virtuous and excellent creature, and worthy to have been wife to the best of men. My advice was required, and I spoke to the advantage of the young gentleman, more out of pity[Pg 105] than that she deserved no better match; for, though he was a gentleman of good family, yet there was great inequality.
On this journey, Mr. James Graham (who is the Privy Purse to the Duke) joined us for part of the way. He's a young man deeply in love with Mrs. Dorothy Howard, one of the maids of honor traveling with us. I couldn’t help but feel sorry for both of them, especially since her mother wasn’t very supportive of the relationship. This lady was not just incredibly beautiful, but also a very virtuous and admirable person, deserving to be married to the best man. I was asked for my advice, and I spoke in favor of the young man, more out of sympathy than because she didn't deserve a better match; even though he came from a good family, their social standing was quite unequal.
14th July, 1675. I went to see my Lord Sunderland's Seat at Althorpe, four miles from the ragged town of Northampton (since burned, and well rebuilt). It is placed in a pretty open bottom, very finely watered and flanked with stately woods and groves in a park, with a canal, but the water is not running, which is a defect. The house, a kind of modern building, of freestone, within most nobly furnished; the apartments very commodious, a gallery and noble hall; but the kitchen being in the body of the house, and chapel too small, were defects. There is an old yet honorable gatehouse standing awry, and out-housing mean, but designed to be taken away. It was moated round, after the old manner, but it is now dry, and turfed with a beautiful carpet. Above all, are admirable and magnificent the several ample gardens furnished with the choicest fruit, and exquisitely kept. Great plenty of oranges, and other curiosities. The park full of fowl, especially herons, and from it a prospect to Holmby House, which being demolished in the late civil wars, shows like a Roman ruin shaded by the trees about it, a stately, solemn, and pleasing view.
14th July, 1675. I went to visit Lord Sunderland's estate at Althorpe, which is four miles from the rough town of Northampton (now burned down and rebuilt). It’s located in a beautiful low area, well-watered, surrounded by impressive woods and groves in a park, with a canal, although the water isn’t flowing, which is a downside. The house is a sort of modern building made of freestone, very elegantly furnished; the rooms are quite spacious, including a gallery and grand hall; however, the kitchen being in the main part of the house and the chapel being too small were drawbacks. There’s an old but respectable gatehouse that’s slightly off-kilter, and the outbuildings are modest but intended to be removed. It used to be surrounded by a moat, in the old style, but it’s now dry and covered with a lovely lawn. Above all, the extensive gardens are exceptional and magnificently maintained, filled with the finest fruits, including an abundance of oranges and other interesting plants. The park is full of birds, especially herons, and offers a view of Holmby House, which, after being destroyed in the recent civil wars, looks like a Roman ruin surrounded by trees, creating a grand, solemn, and pleasing sight.
15th July, 1675. Our cause was pleaded in behalf of the mother, Mrs. Howard and her daughters, before Baron Thurland, who had formerly been steward of Courts for me; we carried our cause, as there was reason, for here was an impudent as well as disobedient son against his mother, by instigation, doubtless, of his wife, one Mrs. Ogle (an ancient maid), whom he had clandestinely married, and who brought him no fortune, he being heir-apparent to the Earl of Berkshire. We lay at Brickhill, in Bedfordshire, and came late the next day to our journey's end.
15th July, 1675. We presented our case on behalf of Mrs. Howard and her daughters to Baron Thurland, who had previously served as my steward. We won our case, as was just, since an insolent and disobedient son stood against his mother, likely urged on by his wife, Mrs. Ogle (an older unmarried woman), whom he had secretly married and who brought him no wealth, even though he was the heir to the Earl of Berkshire. We stayed in Brickhill, Bedfordshire, and arrived at our destination late the next day.
This was a journey of adventures and knight-errantry. One of the lady's servants being as desperately in love with Mrs. Howard's woman, as Mr. Graham was with her daughter, and she riding on horseback behind his rival, the amorous and jealous youth having a little drink in his pate, had here killed himself had he not been prevented; for, alighting from his horse, and drawing his sword, he endeavored twice or thrice to fall on it, but[Pg 106] was interrupted by our coachman, and a stranger passing by. After this, running to his rival, and snatching his sword from his side (for we had beaten his own out of his hand), and on the sudden pulling down his mistress, would have run both of them through; we parted them, not without some blood. This miserable creature poisoned himself for her not many days after they came to London.
This was a journey full of adventures and chivalry. One of the lady's servants was deeply in love with Mrs. Howard's maid, just as Mr. Graham was with her daughter. While riding horseback behind his rival, the lovesick and jealous young man, who had a bit to drink, almost took his own life if he hadn't been stopped. He dismounted from his horse and drew his sword, attempting to stab himself more than once, but[Pg 106]was interrupted by our coachman and a stranger who happened to be passing by. After that, he ran at his rival, snatched the sword from his side (since we had knocked his own out of his hand), and suddenly pulled down his mistress, intending to run both of them through. We managed to separate them, but not without some bloodshed. This unfortunate guy ended up poisoning himself for her just a few days after they arrived in London.
19th July, 1675. The Lord Treasurer's Chaplain preached at Wallingford House.
19th July, 1675. The Lord Treasurer's Chaplain preached at Wallingford House.
9th August, 1675. Dr. Sprat, prebend of Westminster, and Chaplain to the Duke of Buckingham, preached on the 3d Epistle of Jude, showing what the primitive faith was, how near it and how excellent that of the Church of England, also the danger of departing from it.
9th August, 1675. Dr. Sprat, a prebend of Westminster and Chaplain to the Duke of Buckingham, preached on the 3rd Epistle of Jude, discussing what the original faith was, how closely it resembles the excellent faith of the Church of England, and the dangers of straying from it.
27th August, 1675. I visited the Bishop of Rochester, at Bromley, and dined at Sir Philip Warwick's, at Frogpoole [Frognall].
27th August, 1675. I visited the Bishop of Rochester at Bromley and had dinner at Sir Philip Warwick's place at Frogpoole [Frognall].
2d September, 1675. I went to see Dulwich College, being the pious foundation of one Alleyn, a famous comedian, in King James's time. The chapel is pretty, the rest of the hospital very ill contrived; it yet maintains divers poor of both sexes. It is in a melancholy part of Camberwell parish. I came back by certain medicinal Spa waters, at a place called Sydenham Wells, in Lewisham parish, much frequented in summer.
2nd September, 1675. I went to visit Dulwich College, established as a charitable foundation by Alleyn, a famous comedian during King James's era. The chapel is lovely, but the rest of the hospital is poorly designed; it still supports several needy individuals of both genders. It's located in a rather somber area of Camberwell parish. On my way back, I passed by some healing Spa waters at a place called Sydenham Wells, in Lewisham parish, which is quite popular in the summer.
10th September, 1675. I was casually shown the Duchess of Portsmouth's splendid apartment at Whitehall, luxuriously furnished, and with ten times the richness and glory beyond the Queen's; such massy pieces of plate, whole tables, and stands of incredible value.
10th September, 1675. I was casually shown the Duchess of Portsmouth's amazing apartment at Whitehall, luxuriously furnished and far more extravagant than the Queen's; there were heavy pieces of silver, entire tables, and displays of unbelievable worth.
29th September, 1675. I saw the Italian Scaramuccio act before the King at Whitehall, people giving money to come in, which was very scandalous, and never so before at Court diversions. Having seen him act before in Italy, many years past, I was not averse from seeing the most excellent of that kind of folly.
29th September, 1675. I saw the Italian Scaramuccio perform for the King at Whitehall, with people paying to get in, which was quite scandalous and had never happened before at court performances. Having seen him perform in Italy many years ago, I was not opposed to witnessing such a brilliant example of that kind of entertainment.
14th October, 1675. Dined at Kensington with my old acquaintance, Mr. Henshaw, newly returned from Denmark, where he had been left resident after the death of the Duke of Richmond, who died there Ambassador.
14th October, 1675. Had dinner at Kensington with my old friend, Mr. Henshaw, who just returned from Denmark, where he had been staying after the death of the Duke of Richmond, who passed away there as Ambassador.
15th October, 1675. I got an extreme cold, such as was afterward so epidemical, as not only to afflict us in this[Pg 107] island, but was rife over all Europe, like a plague. It was after an exceedingly dry summer and autumn.
15th October, 1675. I caught a severe cold, one that later became so widespread that it not only affected us on this[Pg 107] island but also spread all across Europe, like a plague. This followed an extremely dry summer and autumn.
I settled affairs, my son being to go into France with my Lord Berkeley, designed Ambassador-extraordinary for France and Plenipotentiary for the general treaty of peace at Nimeguen.
I took care of things, with my son set to go to France with my Lord Berkeley, who was appointed as the Ambassador-extraordinary for France and Plenipotentiary for the general treaty of peace at Nimeguen.
24th October, 1675. Dined at Lord Chamberlain's with the Holland Ambassador L. Duras, a valiant gentleman whom his Majesty made an English Baron, of a cadet, and gave him his seat of Holmby, in Northamptonshire.
24th October, 1675. Had dinner at the Lord Chamberlain's with the Holland Ambassador L. Duras, a brave gentleman whom his Majesty made an English Baron from a cadet branch and granted him his seat at Holmby, in Northamptonshire.
27th October, 1675. Lord Berkeley coming into Council, fell down in the gallery at Whitehall, in a fit of apoplexy, and being carried into my Lord Chamberlain's lodgings, several famous doctors were employed all that night, and with much ado he was at last recovered to some sense, by applying hot fire pans and spirit of amber to his head; but nothing was found so effectual as cupping him on the shoulders. It was almost a miraculous restoration. The next day he was carried to Berkeley House. This stopped his journey for the present, and caused my stay in town. He had put all his affairs and his whole estate in England into my hands during his intended absence, which though I was very unfit to undertake, in regard of many businesses which then took me up, yet, upon the great importunity of my lady and Mr. Godolphin (to whom I could refuse nothing) I did take it on me. It seems when he was Deputy in Ireland, not long before, he had been much wronged by one he left in trust with his affairs, and therefore wished for some unmercenary friend who would take that trouble on him; this was to receive his rents, look after his houses and tenants, solicit supplies from the Lord Treasurer, and correspond weekly with him, more than enough to employ any drudge in England; but what will not friendship and love make one do?
27th October, 1675. Lord Berkeley entered the Council, collapsed in the gallery at Whitehall from a stroke, and was taken to my Lord Chamberlain's rooms. Several well-known doctors worked on him all night, and after quite a struggle, he finally regained some awareness by using hot fire pans and amber spirit on his head; however, nothing worked as well as cupping his shoulders. It was nearly a miraculous recovery. The next day, he was moved to Berkeley House. This delayed his journey for the time being and caused me to stay in town. He had entrusted all his affairs and his entire estate in England to me during his planned absence, which I felt unqualified to handle due to many commitments I had at the time. Yet, due to the strong encouragement from my lady and Mr. Godolphin (to whom I could refuse nothing), I took it on. It seems that while he was Deputy in Ireland not long before, he was wronged by someone he had left in charge of his affairs, and thus he wanted an unselfish friend to manage things for him. This involved collecting his rents, overseeing his houses and tenants, seeking support from the Lord Treasurer, and keeping in touch with him weekly—more than enough to occupy any worker in England. But what won’t friendship and love inspire someone to do?
31st October, 1675. Dined at my Lord Chamberlain's, with my son. There were the learned Isaac Vossius, and Spanhemius, son of the famous man of Heidelberg; nor was this gentleman less learned, being a general scholar. Among other pieces, he was author of an excellent treatise on Medals.
31st October, 1675. Had dinner at my Lord Chamberlain's with my son. There were the knowledgeable Isaac Vossius and Spanhemius, the son of the famous scholar from Heidelberg; this gentleman was also quite learned, being a well-rounded intellectual. Among other works, he wrote an excellent treatise on Medals.
10th November, 1675. Being the day appointed for my Lord Ambassador to set out, I met them with my[Pg 108] coach at New Cross. There were with him my Lady his wife, and my dear friend, Mrs. Godolphin, who, out of an extraordinary friendship, would needs accompany my lady to Paris, and stay with her some time, which was the chief inducement for permitting my son to travel, but I knew him safe under her inspection, and in regard my Lord himself had promised to take him into his special favor, he having intrusted all he had to my care.
10th November, 1675. On the day my Lord Ambassador was set to leave, I met them with my[Pg 108] coach at New Cross. Accompanying him were my Lady, his wife, and my dear friend, Mrs. Godolphin, who, out of a deep friendship, insisted on joining my lady to Paris and staying with her for a while. This was the main reason I agreed to let my son travel, but I felt he would be safe under her watch, especially since my Lord had promised to take him under his wing, having entrusted everything he had to my care.
Thus we set out three coaches (besides mine), three wagons, and about forty horses. It being late, and my Lord as yet but valetudinary, we got but to Dartford, the first day, the next to Sittingbourne.
Thus we set out three coaches (besides mine), three wagons, and about forty horses. It being late, and my Lord still being somewhat weak, we only made it to Dartford on the first day, and then to Sittingbourne the next.
At Rochester, the major, Mr. Cony, then an officer of mine for the sick and wounded of that place, gave the ladies a handsome refreshment as we came by his house.
At Rochester, the major, Mr. Cony, who was in charge of caring for the sick and wounded there, offered the ladies a generous snack as we passed by his house.
12th November, 1675. We came to Canterbury: and, next morning, to Dover.
12th November, 1675. We arrived in Canterbury; and, the next morning, we went to Dover.
There was in my Lady Ambassadress's company my Lady Hamilton, a sprightly young lady, much in the good graces of the family, wife of that valiant and worthy gentleman, George Hamilton, not long after slain in the wars. She had been a maid of honor to the Duchess, and now turned Papist.
There was in my Lady Ambassadress's company my Lady Hamilton, a lively young woman, well-liked by the family, and the wife of the brave and honorable George Hamilton, who was killed in the wars not long after. She had been a maid of honor to the Duchess and had now converted to Catholicism.
14th November, 1675. Being Sunday, my Lord having before delivered to me his letter of attorney, keys, seal, and his Will, we took a solemn leave of one another upon the beach, the coaches carrying them into the sea to the boats, which delivered them to Captain Gunman's yacht, the "Mary." Being under sail, the castle gave them seventeen guns, which Captain Gunman answered with eleven. Hence, I went to church, to beg a blessing on their voyage.
14th November, 1675. It was Sunday, and my Lord had previously given me his power of attorney, keys, seal, and his Will. We said a heartfelt goodbye to each other on the beach, as the coaches took them into the sea to the boats, which brought them to Captain Gunman's yacht, the "Mary." Once they set sail, the castle fired seventeen cannon shots in their honor, to which Captain Gunman replied with eleven. Afterward, I went to church to pray for their safe journey.
2d December, 1675. Being returned home, I visited Lady Mordaunt at Parson's Green, my Lord, her son, being sick. This pious woman delivered to me £100 to bestow as I thought fit for the release of poor prisoners, and other charitable uses.
2nd December, 1675. After returning home, I visited Lady Mordaunt at Parson's Green, as her son, my Lord, was sick. This devout woman gave me £100 to spend as I saw fit for the release of poor prisoners and other charitable purposes.
23d December, 1675. Lady Sunderland gave me ten guineas, to bestow in charities.[Pg 109]
23rd December, 1675. Lady Sunderland gave me ten guineas to donate to charities.[Pg 109]
20th February, 1675-76. Dr. Gunning, Bishop of Ely, preached before the King from St. John xx. 21, 22, 23, chiefly against an anonymous book, called "Naked Truth," a famous and popular treatise against the corruption in the Clergy, but not sound as to its quotations, supposed to have been the Bishop of Hereford's and was answered by Dr. Turner, it endeavoring to prove an equality of order of Bishop and Presbyter.
20th February, 1675-76. Dr. Gunning, Bishop of Ely, preached before the King from St. John xx. 21, 22, 23, mainly criticizing an anonymous book called "Naked Truth," a well-known and popular treatise against corruption in the Clergy. However, its quotations were questionable, and it was believed to have been written by the Bishop of Hereford. Dr. Turner responded to it, as it attempted to argue for an equality of order between Bishop and Presbyter.
29th February, 1676. I dined with Mr. Povey, one of the Masters of Requests, a nice contriver of all elegancies, and exceedingly formal. Supped with Sir J. Williamson, where were of our Society Mr. Robert Boyle, Sir Christopher Wren, Sir William Petty, Dr. Holden, subdean of his Majesty's Chapel, Sir James Shaen, Dr. Whistler, and our Secretary, Mr. Oldenburg.
29th February, 1676. I had dinner with Mr. Povey, one of the Masters of Requests, who is quite skilled at creating all sorts of elegant things and very formal. I had supper with Sir J. Williamson, where our Society included Mr. Robert Boyle, Sir Christopher Wren, Sir William Petty, Dr. Holden, subdean of the King's Chapel, Sir James Shaen, Dr. Whistler, and our Secretary, Mr. Oldenburg.
4th March, 1676. Sir Thomas Linch was returned from his government of Jamaica.
4th March, 1676. Sir Thomas Linch came back from his governorship in Jamaica.
16th March, 1676. The Countess of Sunderland and I went by water to Parson's Green, to visit my Lady Mordaunt, and to consult with her about my Lord's monument. We returned by coach.
16th March, 1676. The Countess of Sunderland and I took a boat to Parson's Green to visit Lady Mordaunt and talk with her about my Lord's monument. We came back by coach.
19th March, 1676. Dr. Lloyd, late Curate of Deptford, but now Bishop of Llandaff, preached before the King, on 1 Cor. xv. 57, that though sin subjects us to death, yet through Christ we become his conquerors.
19th March, 1676. Dr. Lloyd, former Curate of Deptford, but now Bishop of Llandaff, preached before the King on 1 Corinthians 15:57, stating that although sin brings us death, through Christ, we become his conquerors.
23d March, 1676. To Twickenham Park, Lord Berkeley's country seat, to examine how the bailiffs and servants ordered matters.
23rd March, 1676. To Twickenham Park, Lord Berkeley's country residence, to check how the bailiffs and staff were managing things.
24th March, 1676. Dr. Brideoake, Bishop of Chichester, preached a mean discourse for a Bishop. I also heard Dr. Fleetwood, Bishop of Worcester, on Matt. xxvi. 38, of the sorrows of Christ, a deadly sorrow caused by our sins; he was no great preacher.
24th March, 1676. Dr. Brideoake, Bishop of Chichester, delivered a rather unimpressive sermon for a Bishop. I also listened to Dr. Fleetwood, Bishop of Worcester, speak on Matt. xxvi. 38, about the sorrows of Christ, a profound sorrow brought on by our sins; he wasn't a very good preacher.
30th March, 1676. Dining with my Lady Sunderland, I saw a fellow swallow a knife, and divers great pebble stones, which would make a plain rattling one against another. The knife was in a sheath of horn.
30th March, 1676. Dining with my Lady Sunderland, I saw a guy swallow a knife and several large pebble stones that would rattle against each other. The knife was in a horn sheath.
Dr. North, son of my Lord North, preached before the King, on Isaiah liii. 57, a very young but learned[Pg 110] and excellent person. Note. This was the first time the Duke appeared no more in chapel, to the infinite grief and threatened ruin of this poor nation.
Dr. North, son of Lord North, preached before the King on Isaiah 53:7, a very young but knowledgeable and outstanding person. Note: This was the first time the Duke no longer appeared in chapel, causing immense sadness and a looming crisis for this poor nation.
2d April, 1676. I had now notice that my dear friend Mrs. Godolphin, was returning from Paris. On the 6th, she arrived to my great joy, whom I most heartily welcomed.
2d April, 1676. I was now aware that my dear friend Mrs. Godolphin was coming back from Paris. On the 6th, she arrived, and I was filled with joy as I warmly welcomed her.
28th April, 1676. My wife entertained her Majesty at Deptford, for which the Queen gave me thanks in the withdrawing room at Whitehall.
28th April, 1676. My wife hosted her Majesty at Deptford, for which the Queen thanked me in the sitting room at Whitehall.
The University of Oxford presented me with the "Marmora Oxoniensia Arundeliana"; the Bishop of Oxford writing to desire that I would introduce Mr. Prideaux, the editor (a young man most learned in antiquities) to the Duke of Norfolk, to present another dedicated to his Grace, which I did, and we dined with the Duke at Arundel House, and supped at the Bishop of Rochester's with Isaac Vossius.
The University of Oxford gave me the "Marmora Oxoniensia Arundeliana"; the Bishop of Oxford asked me to introduce Mr. Prideaux, the editor (a young man very knowledgeable about antiquities), to the Duke of Norfolk, to present another dedication to his Grace, which I did. We had dinner with the Duke at Arundel House and then had supper at the Bishop of Rochester's with Isaac Vossius.
7th May, 1676. I spoke to the Duke of York about my Lord Berkeley's going to Nimeguen. Thence, to the Queen's Council at Somerset House, about Mrs. Godolphin's lease of Spalding, in Lincolnshire.
7th May, 1676. I talked to the Duke of York about Lord Berkeley's trip to Nimeguen. Then, I went to the Queen's Council at Somerset House regarding Mrs. Godolphin's lease of Spalding in Lincolnshire.
11th May, 1676. I dined with Mr. Charleton, and went to see Mr. Montague's new palace, near Bloomsbury, built by Mr. Hooke, of our Society, after the French manner.36
11th May, 1676. I had lunch with Mr. Charleton and visited Mr. Montague's new palace near Bloomsbury, built by Mr. Hooke, a member of our Society, in the French style.
13th May, 1676. Returned home, and found my son returned from France; praised be God!
13th May, 1676. Came back home and found my son had returned from France; thank God!
22d May, 1676. Trinity Monday. A chaplain of my Lord Ossory's preached, after which we took barge to Trinity House in London. Mr. Pepys (Secretary of the Admiralty) succeeded my Lord as Master.
22nd May, 1676. Trinity Monday. A chaplain of my Lord Ossory preached, after which we took a boat to Trinity House in London. Mr. Pepys (Secretary of the Admiralty) succeeded my Lord as Master.
2d June, 1676. I went with my Lord Chamberlain to see a garden, at Enfield town; thence, to Mr. Secretary Coventry's lodge in the Chase. It is a very pretty place, the house commodious, the gardens handsome, and our entertainment very free, there being none but my Lord and myself. That which I most wondered at was, that, in the compass of twenty-five miles, yet within fourteen of London, there is not a house, barn, church, or building, besides three lodges. To this Lodge are three great ponds, and some few inclosures, the rest a[Pg 111] solitary desert, yet stored with no less than 3,000 deer. These are pretty retreats for gentlemen, especially for those who are studious and lovers of privacy.
2nd June, 1676. I went with my Lord Chamberlain to check out a garden in Enfield town; then we headed to Mr. Secretary Coventry's lodge in the Chase. It's a lovely place, the house is spacious, the gardens are beautiful, and we had a relaxed time as there were only my Lord and me. What amazed me the most was that within a twenty-five-mile area, yet only fourteen miles from London, there isn't a single house, barn, church, or building, aside from three lodges. At this Lodge, there are three large ponds and a few enclosed areas, the rest is a solitary wilderness, yet it's home to no less than 3,000 deer. These are nice retreats for gentlemen, especially for those who enjoy studying and value their privacy.
We returned in the evening by Hampstead, to see Lord Wotton's house and garden (Bellsize House), built with vast expense by Mr. O'Neale, an Irish gentleman who married Lord Wotton's mother, Lady Stanhope. The furniture is very particular for Indian cabinets, porcelain, and other solid and noble movables. The gallery very fine, the gardens very large, but ill kept, yet woody and chargeable. The soil a cold weeping clay, not answering the expense.
We returned in the evening via Hampstead to check out Lord Wotton's house and garden (Bellsize House), which was built at great expense by Mr. O'Neale, an Irish gentleman who married Lord Wotton's mother, Lady Stanhope. The furniture includes some unique Indian cabinets, porcelain, and other solid and impressive items. The gallery is quite nice, and the gardens are very large but poorly maintained, although they are wooded and chargeable. The soil is a cold, wet clay that doesn't justify the expense.
12th June, 1676. I went to see Sir Thomas Bond's new and fine house by Peckham; it is on a flat, but has a fine garden and prospect through the meadows to London.
12th June, 1676. I visited Sir Thomas Bond's new and impressive house in Peckham; it's situated on a flat area but features a lovely garden and a view through the meadows to London.
2d July, 1676. Dr. Castillion, Prebend of Canterbury, preached before the King, on John xv. 22, at Whitehall.
2nd July, 1676. Dr. Castillion, Prebend of Canterbury, preached before the King on John 15:22 at Whitehall.
19th July, 1676. Went to the funeral of Sir William Sanderson, husband to the Mother of the Maids, and author of two large but mean histories of King James and King Charles I. He was buried at Westminster.
19th July, 1676. Attended the funeral of Sir William Sanderson, husband of the Mother of the Maids, and author of two lengthy but poor histories of King James and King Charles I. He was buried at Westminster.
1st August, 1676. In the afternoon, after prayers at St. James's Chapel, was christened a daughter of Dr. Leake's, the Duke's Chaplain: godmothers were Lady Mary, daughter of the Duke of York, and the Duchess of Monmouth: godfather, the Earl of Bath.
1st August, 1676. In the afternoon, after prayers at St. James's Chapel, a daughter of Dr. Leake's was baptized. The godmothers were Lady Mary, daughter of the Duke of York, and the Duchess of Monmouth; the godfather was the Earl of Bath.
15th August, 1676. Came to dine with me my Lord Halifax, Sir Thomas Meeres, one of the Commissioners of the Admiralty, Sir John Clayton, Mr. Slingsby, Mr. Henshaw, and Mr. Bridgeman.
15th August, 1676. Came to dine with me my Lord Halifax, Sir Thomas Meeres, one of the Commissioners of the Admiralty, Sir John Clayton, Mr. Slingsby, Mr. Henshaw, and Mr. Bridgeman.
25th August, 1676. Dined with Sir John Banks at his house in Lincoln's Inn Fields, on recommending Mr. Upman to be tutor to his son going into France. This Sir John Banks was a merchant of small beginning, but had amassed £100,000.
25th August, 1676. Had dinner with Sir John Banks at his house in Lincoln's Inn Fields, discussing Mr. Upman as a tutor for his son who is going to France. Sir John Banks was a merchant who started small but had accumulated £100,000.
26th August, 1676. I dined at the Admiralty with Secretary Pepys, and supped at the Lord Chamberlain's. Here was Captain Baker, who had been lately on the attempt of the Northwest passage. He reported prodigious depth of ice, blue as a sapphire, and as transparent. The thick mists were their chief impediment, and cause of their return.[Pg 112]
26th August, 1676. I had dinner at the Admiralty with Secretary Pepys and later had supper at the Lord Chamberlain’s. Captain Baker was there, who had recently tried to find the Northwest Passage. He reported an incredible depth of ice, blue like a sapphire and completely transparent. The thick mists were their main obstacle and the reason for their return.[Pg 112]
2d September, 1676. I paid £1,700 to the Marquis de Sissac, which he had lent to my Lord Berkeley, and which I heard the Marquis lost at play in a night or two.
2d September, 1676. I paid £1,700 to the Marquis de Sissac, which he had lent to my Lord Berkeley, and which I heard the Marquis lost while gambling in a night or two.
The Dean of Chichester preached before the King, on Acts xxiv. 16; and Dr. Crichton preached the second sermon before him on Psalm xc. 12, of wisely numbering our days, and well employing our time.
The Dean of Chichester preached before the King, on Acts 24:16; and Dr. Crichton delivered the second sermon before him on Psalm 90:12, about wisely counting our days and making good use of our time.
3d September, 1676. Dined at Captain Graham's, where I became acquainted with Dr. Compton (brother to the Earl of Northampton), now Bishop of London, and Mr. North, son to the Lord North, brother to the Lord Chief-Justice and Clerk of the Closet, a most hopeful young man. The Bishop had once been a soldier, had also traveled in Italy, and became a most sober, grave, and excellent prelate.
3rd September, 1676. Had dinner at Captain Graham's, where I met Dr. Compton (brother to the Earl of Northampton), who is now the Bishop of London, and Mr. North, son of Lord North, brother to the Lord Chief Justice and Clerk of the Closet, a very promising young man. The Bishop had once been a soldier, had also traveled in Italy, and became a very serious, dignified, and exceptional bishop.
6th September, 1676. Supped at the Lord Chamberlain's, where also supped the famous beauty and errant lady, the Duchess of Mazarine (all the world knows her story), the Duke of Monmouth, Countess of Sussex (both natural children of the King by the Duchess of Cleveland37), and the Countess of Derby, a virtuous lady, daughter to my best friend, the Earl of Ossory.
6th September, 1676. Had dinner at the Lord Chamberlain's, where the renowned beauty and scandalous lady, the Duchess of Mazarine (everyone knows her story), the Duke of Monmouth, and the Countess of Sussex (both illegitimate children of the King with the Duchess of Cleveland37) were also present, along with the Countess of Derby, a respectable lady and the daughter of my close friend, the Earl of Ossory.
10th September, 1676. Dined with me Mr. Flamsted, the learned astrologer and mathematician, whom his Majesty had established in the new Observatory in Greenwich Park, furnished with the choicest instruments. An honest, sincere man.
10th September, 1676. I had dinner with Mr. Flamsted, the knowledgeable astrologer and mathematician, whom the King had appointed to the new Observatory in Greenwich Park, equipped with the best instruments. A genuinely honest and sincere man.
12th September, 1676. To London, to take order about the building of a house, or rather an apartment, which had all the conveniences of a house, for my dear friend, Mr. Godolphin and lady, which I undertook to contrive and survey, and employ workmen until it should be quite finished; it being just over against his Majesty's wood-yard by the Thames side, leading to Scotland Yard.
12th September, 1676. I went to London to arrange the construction of a house, or more accurately, an apartment, that had all the comforts of a house for my dear friend, Mr. Godolphin and his wife. I took on the responsibility to design, oversee, and hire workers until it was completely finished; it was located directly across from the king's wood yard by the Thames, leading to Scotland Yard.
19th September, 1676. To Lambeth, to that rare mag[Pg 113]azine of marble, to take order for chimney-pieces, etc., for Mr. Godolphin's house. The owner of the works had built for himself a pretty dwelling house; this Dutchman had contracted with the Genoese for all their marble. We also saw the Duke of Buckingham's glasswork, where they made huge vases of metal as clear, ponderous, and thick as crystal; also looking-glasses far larger and better than any that come from Venice.
19th September, 1676. To Lambeth, to that unique marble place[Pg 113] to order chimney pieces and other things for Mr. Godolphin's house. The owner of the workshop had built a nice home for himself; this Dutchman had contracted with the Genoese for all their marble. We also visited the Duke of Buckingham's glassworks, where they created huge metal vases that were as clear, heavy, and thick as crystal; they also produced mirrors much larger and better than any that come from Venice.
9th October, 1676. I went with Mrs. Godolphin and my wife to Blackwall, to see some Indian curiosities; the streets being slippery, I fell against a piece of timber with such violence that I could not speak nor fetch my breath for some space; being carried into a house and let blood, I was removed to the water-side and so home, where, after a day's rest, I recovered. This being one of my greatest deliverances, the Lord Jesus make me ever mindful and thankful!
9th October, 1676. I went with Mrs. Godolphin and my wife to Blackwall to check out some Indian curiosities. The streets were slippery, and I fell against a piece of timber with such force that I couldn't speak or catch my breath for a while. I was carried into a house and had blood drawn, then I was taken to the water-side and back home, where, after resting for a day, I recovered. This was one of my greatest escapes, and I pray that the Lord Jesus keeps me mindful and grateful!
31st October, 1676. Being my birthday, and fifty-six years old, I spent the morning in devotion and imploring God's protection, with solemn thanksgiving for all his signal mercies to me, especially for that escape which concerned me this month at Blackwall. Dined with Mrs. Godolphin, and returned home through a prodigious and dangerous mist.
31st October, 1676. On my birthday, turning fifty-six years old, I spent the morning in prayer, asking for God's protection and giving heartfelt thanks for all the significant blessings I've received, particularly for the escape I had this month at Blackwall. I had lunch with Mrs. Godolphin and made my way home through an overwhelming and hazardous fog.
9th November, 1676. Finished the lease of Spalding, for Mr. Godolphin.
9th November, 1676. Completed the lease of Spalding for Mr. Godolphin.
16th November, 1676. My son and I dining at my Lord Chamberlain's, he showed us among others that incomparable piece of Raphael's, being a Minister of State dictating to Guicciardini, the earnestness of whose face looking up in expectation of what he was next to write, is so to the life, and so natural, as I esteem it one of the choicest pieces of that admirable artist. There was a woman's head of Leonardo da Vinci; a Madonna of old Palma, and two of Vandyke's, of which one was his own picture at length, when young, in a leaning posture; the other, an eunuch, singing. Rare pieces indeed!
16th November, 1676. My son and I were dining at my Lord Chamberlain's, where he showed us, among other things, that incredible piece by Raphael, featuring a Minister of State dictating to Guicciardini. The expression on Guicciardini's face, looking up in anticipation of what he was about to write, is so lifelike and natural that I consider it one of the finest works of that remarkable artist. There was also a woman’s head by Leonardo da Vinci, a Madonna by old Palma, and two pieces by Vandyke. One was a full portrait of himself when he was young, in a relaxed position; the other was an eunuch singing. Truly rare pieces!
4th December, 1676. I saw the great ball danced by all the gallants and ladies at the Duchess of York's.
4th December, 1676. I watched the grand ball performed by all the gentlemen and ladies at the Duchess of York's.
10th December, 1676. There fell so deep a snow as hindered us from church.
10th December, 1676. It snowed so heavily that we couldn't make it to church.
12th December, 1676. To London, in so great a snow, as I remember not to have seen the like.[Pg 114]
12th December, 1676. To London, in such heavy snow, that I can't remember ever seeing anything like it.[Pg 114]
17th December, 1676. More snow falling, I was not able to get to church.
17th December, 1676. With more snow falling, I couldn’t make it to church.
8th February, 1676-77. I went to Roehampton, with my Lady Duchess of Ormond. The garden and perspective is pretty, the prospect most agreeable.
8th February, 1676-77. I went to Roehampton with my lady, the Duchess of Ormond. The garden and view are lovely, and the outlook is very pleasant.
15th May, 1677. Came the Earl of Peterborough, to desire me to be a trustee for Lord Viscount Mordaunt and the Countess, for the sale of certain lands set out by Act of Parliament, to pay debts.
15th May, 1677. The Earl of Peterborough came to ask me to be a trustee for Lord Viscount Mordaunt and the Countess, for the sale of certain lands designated by Act of Parliament to pay off debts.
12th June, 1677. I went to London, to give the Lord Ambassador Berkeley (now returned from the treaty at Nimeguen) an account of the great trust reposed in me during his absence, I having received and remitted to him no less than £20,000 to my no small trouble and loss of time, that during his absence, and when the Lord Treasurer was no great friend [of his] I yet procured him great sums, very often soliciting his Majesty in his behalf; looking after the rest of his estates and concerns entirely, without once accepting any kind of acknowledgment, purely upon the request of my dear friend, Mr. Godolphin. I returned with abundance of thanks and professions from my Lord Berkeley and my Lady.
12th June, 1677. I went to London to give Lord Ambassador Berkeley (who has just returned from the treaty at Nimeguen) an update on the significant responsibility that was placed on me during his absence. I managed to receive and pass on no less than £20,000, which took quite a bit of effort and time. Even while he was away, and when the Lord Treasurer wasn't particularly supportive of him, I managed to secure substantial amounts for him, frequently appealing to His Majesty on his behalf. I took care of the rest of his properties and matters completely, without ever accepting any form of recognition, solely at the request of my dear friend, Mr. Godolphin. I returned with many thanks and expressions of gratitude from Lord Berkeley and Lady Berkeley.
29th June, 1677. This business being now at an end, and myself delivered from that intolerable servitude and correspondence, I had leisure to be somewhat more at home and to myself.
29th June, 1677. Now that this situation is over, and I am free from that unbearable obligation and communication, I had the time to be more at home and to focus on myself.
3d July, 1677. I sealed the deeds of sale of the manor of Blechingley to Sir Robert Clayton, for payment of Lord Peterborough's debts, according to the trust of the Act of Parliament.
3rd July, 1677. I signed the sale documents for the manor of Blechingley to Sir Robert Clayton, to pay off Lord Peterborough's debts, as required by the trust of the Act of Parliament.
16th July, 1677. I went to Wotton.—22d. Mr. Evans, curate of Abinger, preached an excellent sermon on Matt. v. 12. In the afternoon, Mr. Higham at Wotton catechised.
16th July, 1677. I went to Wotton.—22nd. Mr. Evans, the curate of Abinger, delivered an excellent sermon on Matt. v. 12. In the afternoon, Mr. Higham at Wotton led the catechism.
26th July, 1677. I dined at Mr. Duncomb's, at Sheere, whose house stands environed with very sweet and quick streams.
26th July, 1677. I had dinner at Mr. Duncomb's in Sheere, whose house is surrounded by very pleasant and fast-moving streams.
29th July, 1677. Mr. Bohun, my Son's late tutor, preached at Abinger, on Phil., iv. 8, very elegantly and practically.
29th July, 1677. Mr. Bohun, my son’s former tutor, preached at Abinger on Philippians 4:8, very elegantly and practically.
5th August, 1677. I went to visit my Lord Brounker, now taking the waters at Dulwich.[Pg 115]
5th August, 1677. I went to visit my Lord Brounker, who is currently at Dulwich for his health treatments.[Pg 115]
9th August, 1677. Dined at the Earl of Peterborough's the day after the marriage of my Lord of Arundel to Lady Mary Mordaunt, daughter of the Earl of Peterborough.
9th August, 1677. Had dinner at the Earl of Peterborough's the day after the wedding of Lord Arundel to Lady Mary Mordaunt, the daughter of the Earl of Peterborough.
28th August, 1677. To visit my Lord Chamberlain, in Suffolk; he sent his coach and six to meet and bring me from St. Edmund's Bury to Euston.
28th August, 1677. I went to see my Lord Chamberlain in Suffolk; he sent his coach and six to pick me up and take me from St. Edmund's Bury to Euston.
29th August, 1677. We hunted in the Park and killed a very fat buck.
29th August, 1677. We went hunting in the Park and took down a very fat buck.
31st August, 1677. I went a hawking.
31st August, 1677. I went hawking.
4th September, 1677. I went to visit my Lord Crofts, now dying at St. Edmunds Bury, and took the opportunity to see this ancient town, and the remains of that famous monastery and abbey. There is little standing entire, save the gatehouse; it has been a vast and magnificent Gothic structure, and of great extent. The gates are wood, but quite plated over with iron. There are also two stately churches, one especially.
4th September, 1677. I went to visit my Lord Crofts, who is now dying at St. Edmunds Bury, and took the chance to explore this historic town and the remains of the famous monastery and abbey. There’s not much left intact, except for the gatehouse; it used to be a vast and magnificent Gothic structure, and it was quite large. The gates are made of wood, but they’re covered in iron. There are also two impressive churches, one in particular.
5th September, 1677. I went to Thetford, to the borough-town, where stand the ruins of a religious house: there is a round mountain artificially raised, either for some castle, or monument, which makes a pretty landscape. As we went and returned, a tumbler showed his extraordinary address in the Warren. I also saw the Decoy; much pleased with the stratagem.
5th September, 1677. I went to Thetford, to the borough-town, where the ruins of a religious house stand: there is a round hill made by humans, either for some castle or monument, which creates a lovely landscape. As we went to and from there, a juggler amazed us with his skills in the Warren. I also saw the Decoy; I was quite pleased with the clever trick.
7th September, 1677. There dined this day at my Lord's one Sir John Gaudy, a very handsome person, but quite dumb, yet very intelligent by signs, and a very fine painter; he was so civil and well bred, as it was not possible to discern any imperfection in him. His lady and children were also there, and he was at church in the morning with us.
7th September, 1677. Today at my Lord's, we had dinner with Sir John Gaudy, a very good-looking man who couldn't speak but was quite smart with his gestures, and a talented painter. He was so polite and well-mannered that you couldn't notice any flaws in him. His wife and children were there too, and he joined us at church in the morning.
9th September, 1677. A stranger preached at Euston Church, and fell into a handsome panegyric on my Lord's new building the church, which indeed for its elegance and cheerfulness, is one of the prettiest country churches in England. My Lord told me his heart smote him that, after he had bestowed so much on his magnificent palace there, he should see God's House in the ruin it lay in. He has also rebuilt the parsonage-house, all of stone, very neat and ample.
9th September, 1677. A stranger preached at Euston Church and gave a glowing tribute to my Lord's new church building, which is truly one of the prettiest country churches in England for its elegance and brightness. My Lord confided that he felt guilty because, after investing so much in his impressive palace there, he found God's House in such a state of disrepair. He has also rebuilt the parsonage, all in stone, which is very neat and spacious.
10th September, 1677. To divert me, my Lord would needs carry me to see Ipswich, when we dined with one[Pg 116] Mr. Mann by the way, who was Recorder of the town. There were in our company my Lord Huntingtower, son to the Duchess of Lauderdale, Sir Edward Bacon, a learned gentleman of the family of the great Chancellor Verulam, and Sir John Felton, with some other knights and gentlemen. After dinner came the bailiff and magistrates in their formalities with their maces to compliment my Lord, and invite him to the town-house, where they presented us a collation of dried sweetmeats and wine, the bells ringing, etc. Then, we went to see the town, and first, the Lord Viscount Hereford's house, which stands in a park near the town, like that at Brussels, in Flanders; the house not great, yet pretty, especially the hall. The stews for fish succeeded one another, and feed one the other, all paved at bottom. There is a good picture of the blessed virgin in one of the parlors, seeming to be of Holbein, or some good master. Then we saw the Haven, seven miles from Harwich. The tide runs out every day, but the bedding being soft mud, it is safe for shipping and a station. The trade of Ipswich is for the most part Newcastle coals, with which they supply London; but it was formerly a clothing town. There is not any beggar asks alms in the whole place, a thing very extraordinary, so ordered by the prudence of the magistrates. It has in it fourteen or fifteen beautiful churches: in a word, it is for building, cleanness, and good order, one of the best towns in England. Cardinal Wolsey was a butcher's son of Ipswich, but there is little of that magnificent Prelate's foundation here, besides a school and I think a library, which I did not see. His intentions were to build some great thing. EUSTON We returned late to Euston, having traveled about fifty miles this day.
10th September, 1677. To entertain me, my Lord insisted on taking me to see Ipswich, where we stopped for lunch with Mr. Mann, the town’s Recorder. Our company included Lord Huntingtower, son of the Duchess of Lauderdale, Sir Edward Bacon, an educated gentleman from the family of the great Chancellor Verulam, and Sir John Felton, along with some other knights and gentlemen. After lunch, the bailiff and magistrates arrived in their formal attire with their maces to greet my Lord and invite him to the town hall, where they treated us to a spread of dried sweets and wine, accompanied by the ringing of bells, etc. Then we set out to explore the town, starting with the Lord Viscount Hereford's house, which is situated in a park near the town, resembling the one in Brussels, Flanders; the house isn't large, but quite nice, especially the hall. The fish ponds followed one another, feeding into each other, all nicely paved at the bottom. There’s a lovely painting of the Blessed Virgin in one of the parlors, appearing to be by Holbein or some other talented master. After that, we visited the Haven, seven miles from Harwich. The tide goes out every day, but since the bottom is soft mud, it’s safe for ships and a good anchorage. Ipswich's trade mainly consists of Newcastle coal, which they supply to London; however, it used to be a clothing town. Remarkably, there isn’t a single beggar asking for alms in the entire place, a testament to the wisdom of the magistrates. There are fourteen or fifteen beautiful churches there: in short, for its buildings, cleanliness, and order, it’s one of the best towns in England. Cardinal Wolsey, a butcher's son from Ipswich, had little of his magnificent foundations remaining here, aside from a school and, I believe, a library, which I didn’t see. He had plans to build something grand. Euston We returned late to Euston, having traveled about fifty miles that day.
Since first I was at this place, I found things exceedingly improved. It is seated in a bottom between two graceful swellings, the main building being now in the figure of a Greek II with four pavilions, two at each corner, and a break in the front, railed and balustered at the top, where I caused huge jars to be placed full of earth to keep them steady upon their pedestals between the statues, which make as good a show as if they were of stone, and, though the building be of brick, and but two stories besides cellars and garrets covered with[Pg 117] blue slate, yet there is room enough for a full court, the offices and outhouses being so ample and well disposed. The King's apartment is painted à fresco, and magnificently furnished. There are many excellent pictures of the great masters. The gallery is a pleasant, noble room; in the break, or middle, is a billiard table, but the wainscot, being of fir, and painted, does not please me so well as Spanish oak without paint. The chapel is pretty, the porch descending to the gardens. The orange garden is very fine, and leads into the greenhouse, at the end of which is a hall to eat in, and the conservatory some hundred feet long, adorned with maps, as the other side is with the heads of the Cæsars, ill cut in alabaster; above are several apartments for my Lord, Lady, and Duchess, with kitchens and other offices below, in a lesser form; lodgings for servants, all distinct for them to retire to when they please and would be in private, and have no communication with the palace, which he tells me he will wholly resign to his son-in-law and daughter, that charming young creature.
Since I first arrived here, I’ve noticed a lot of improvements. It’s situated in a low area between two gentle hills, and the main building is now shaped like a Greek II with four pavilions, two at each corner, and a break in the front that has a railing and balustrade at the top. I had large jars placed full of earth to keep them stable on their pedestals between the statues, which look just as good as if they were made of stone. Even though the building is made of brick and has only two stories plus cellars and attics covered with blue slate, there’s plenty of space for a full court, and the offices and outbuildings are ample and well arranged. The King's apartment is painted in fresco and is magnificently furnished. There are many excellent paintings by great masters. The gallery is a lovely, impressive room; in the middle, there’s a billiard table, but the wainscoting, made of fir and painted, doesn't appeal to me as much as unpainted Spanish oak. The chapel is nice, and the porch leads down to the gardens. The orange garden is very nice and connects to the greenhouse, at the end of which there’s a dining hall, and the conservatory is several hundred feet long, decorated with maps, while the other side features the heads of the Caesars, poorly carved in alabaster. Above are several rooms for my Lord, Lady, and Duchess, with kitchens and other facilities below in a smaller layout. There are separate accommodations for servants, all distinct so they can retreat when they want to be private and have no connection with the palace. He tells me he will completely hand it over to his son-in-law and daughter, that charming young woman.
The canal running under my Lady's dressing room chamber window, is full of carps and fowl, which come and are fed there. The cascade at the end of the canal turns a cornmill that provides the family, and raises water for the fountains and offices. To pass this canal into the opposite meadows, Sir Samuel Morland has invented a screw bridge, which, being turned with a key, lands you fifty feet distant at the entrance of an ascending walk of trees, a mile in length,—as it is also on the front into the park,—of four rows of ash trees, and reaches to the park pale, which is nine miles in compass, and the best for riding and meeting the game that I ever saw. There were now of red and fallow deer almost a thousand, with good covert, but the soil barren and flying sand, in which nothing will grow kindly. The tufts of fir, and much of the other wood, were planted by my direction some years before. This seat is admirably placed for field sports, hawking, hunting, or racing. The mutton is small, but sweet. The stables hold thirty horses and four coaches. The out-offices make two large quadrangles, so as servants never lived with more ease and convenience; never master more civil. Strangers are attended and accommodated as at their home, in[Pg 118] pretty apartments furnished with all manner of conveniences and privacy.
The canal running under my lady's dressing room window is filled with carp and birds, which come and get fed there. The waterfall at the end of the canal powers a corn mill that supports the family and provides water for the fountains and various functions. To cross the canal into the meadows on the other side, Sir Samuel Morland invented a screw bridge that, when turned with a key, drops you fifty feet away at the start of an uphill path lined with trees, stretching a mile long. This path also leads to the park, which is surrounded by four rows of ash trees and encircled by a nine-mile fence, making it the best spot I’ve seen for riding and hunting game. There are currently about a thousand deer, both red and fallow, along with good cover, although the soil is poor and sandy, making it hard for anything to grow well. The clusters of firs and much of the surrounding woods were planted at my suggestion years ago. This place is perfectly situated for field sports, including falconry, hunting, or racing. The mutton is small but flavorful. The stables can accommodate thirty horses and four coaches. The outbuildings form two large courtyards, allowing servants to live in comfort and ease, and the master is quite courteous. Guests are welcomed and treated as if they were at home, in pretty rooms equipped with various conveniences and privacy.
There is a library full of excellent books; bathing rooms, elaboratory, dispensary, a decoy, and places to keep and fat fowl in. He had now in his new church (near the garden) built a dormitory, or vault, with several repositories, in which to bury his family.
There is a library filled with great books; restrooms, a lab, a pharmacy, a decoy, and places to keep and fatten fowl. He had now built a dormitory, or vault, in his new church (near the garden), with several storage areas to bury his family.
In the expense of this pious structure, the church is most laudable, most of the houses of God in this country resembling rather stables and thatched cottages than temples in which to serve the Most High. He has built a lodge in the park for the keeper, which is a neat dwelling, and might become any gentleman. The same has he done for the parson, little deserving it for murmuring that my Lord put him some time out of his wretched hovel, while it was building. He has also erected a fair inn at some distance from his palace, with a bridge of stone over a river near it, and repaired all the tenants' houses, so as there is nothing but neatness and accommodations about his estate, which I yet think is not above £1,500 a year. I believe he had now in his family one hundred domestic servants.
In financing this humble structure, the church is commendable, as most houses of worship in this country look more like stables and thatched cottages than places to honor the Most High. He has built a lodge in the park for the caretaker, which is a tidy home and could belong to any gentleman. He has done the same for the parson, who hardly deserves it for complaining that my Lord temporarily removed him from his miserable hovel while it was being constructed. He has also built a nice inn a short distance from his palace, with a stone bridge over a nearby river, and repaired all the tenants' homes, so everything around his estate is neat and accommodating, which I think is still only worth about £1,500 a year. I believe he currently has one hundred domestic servants in his household.
His lady (being one of the Brederode's daughters, grandchild to a natural son of Henry Frederick, Prince of Orange) is a good-natured and obliging woman. They love fine things, and to live easily, pompously, and hospitably; but, with so vast expense, as plunges my Lord into debts exceedingly. My Lord himself is given into no expensive vice but building, and to have all things rich, polite, and princely. He never plays, but reads much, having the Latin, French, and Spanish tongues in perfection. He has traveled much, and is the best bred and courtly person his Majesty has about him, so as the public Ministers more frequent him than any of the rest of the nobility. While he was Secretary of State and Prime Minister, he had gotten vastly, but spent it as hastily, even before he had established a fund to maintain his greatness; and now beginning to decline in favor (the Duke being no great friend of his), he knows not how to retrench. He was son of a Doctor of Laws, whom I have seen, and, being sent from Westminster School to Oxford, with intention to be a divine, and parson of Arlington, a village near Brentford, when Master of Arts[Pg 119] the Rebellion falling out, he followed the King's Army, and receiving an HONORABLE WOUND IN THE FACE, grew into favor, and was advanced from a mean fortune, at his Majesty's Restoration, to be an Earl and Knight of the Garter, Lord Chamberlain of the Household, and first favorite for a long time, during which the King married his natural son, the Duke of Grafton, to his only daughter and heiress, as before mentioned, worthy for her beauty and virtue of the greatest prince in Christendom. My Lord is, besides this, a prudent and understanding person in business, and speaks well; unfortunate yet in those he has advanced, most of them proving ungrateful. The many obligations and civilities I have received from this noble gentleman, extracts from me this character, and I am sorry he is in no better circumstances.
His lady (one of Brederode's daughters, grandchild of a natural son of Henry Frederick, Prince of Orange) is a kind and helpful woman. They enjoy fine things and aim to live comfortably, lavishly, and hospitably; however, this extravagant lifestyle has led my Lord into considerable debt. My Lord himself doesn’t indulge in any costly vices except for building, wanting everything to be luxurious, refined, and princely. He doesn’t gamble but reads a lot, being fluent in Latin, French, and Spanish. He has traveled extensively and is the most cultured and genteel person his Majesty associates with, so much so that public Ministers seek him out more than the other nobles. While he was Secretary of State and Prime Minister, he earned a lot but spent it just as quickly, even before establishing a reserve to maintain his status; and now, as he begins to lose favor (with the Duke not being a supporter), he doesn’t know how to cut back. He is the son of a Doctor of Laws, whom I have met. After being sent from Westminster School to Oxford with the intention of becoming a clergyman and priest of Arlington, a village near Brentford, when he finished his Master of Arts, the Rebellion broke out. He joined the King’s Army, and after receiving an Noble facial injury, he gained favor and rose from modest beginnings to become an Earl, Knight of the Garter, Lord Chamberlain of the Household, and long-time favorite of the King, during which time the King married his natural son, the Duke of Grafton, to his only daughter and heiress, noted for her beauty and virtue, worthy of the greatest prince in Christendom. My Lord is also a sensible and insightful person in business, and he speaks well; unfortunately, many of those he has helped have turned out to be ungrateful. The many kindnesses and favors I have received from this noble gentleman compel me to write this, and I regret that he is in such difficult circumstances.
Having now passed near three weeks at Euston, to my great satisfaction, with much difficulty he suffered me to look homeward, being very earnest with me to stay longer; and, to engage me, would himself have carried me to Lynn-Regis, a town of important traffic, about twenty miles beyond, which I had never seen; as also the Traveling Sands, about ten miles wide of Euston, that have so damaged the country, rolling from place to place, and, like the Sands in the Deserts of Lybia, quite overwhelmed some gentlemen's whole estates, as the relation extant in print, and brought to our Society, describes at large.
Having spent almost three weeks at Euston, I was really happy when he finally allowed me to look back home, although he urged me to stay longer. To convince me, he even offered to take me to Lynn-Regis, a busy town about twenty miles away that I had never visited, as well as to the Traveling Sands, located about ten miles west of Euston. These sands have caused significant damage to the area, moving from place to place and, like the sands in the deserts of Libya, completely burying some gentlemen’s estates, as documented in the printed account that was brought to our Society, which describes it in detail at large.
13th September, 1677. My Lord's coach conveyed me to Bury, and thence baiting at Newmarket, stepping in at Audley-End to see that house again, I slept at Bishop-Stortford, and, the next day, home. I was accompanied in my journey by Major Fairfax, of a younger house of the Lord Fairfax, a soldier, a traveler, an excellent musician, a good-natured, well-bred gentleman.
13th September, 1677. My Lord’s coach took me to Bury, and after a stop at Newmarket, I visited Audley-End to see the house again. I stayed overnight at Bishop-Stortford and then headed home the next day. I was joined on my journey by Major Fairfax, from a younger branch of the Lord Fairfax family—a soldier, a traveler, a talented musician, and a good-natured, well-mannered gentleman.
18th September, 1677. I preferred Mr. Phillips (nephew of Milton) to the service of my Lord Chamberlain, who wanted a scholar to read to and entertain him sometimes.
18th September, 1677. I chose Mr. Phillips (nephew of Milton) for the service of my Lord Chamberlain, who wanted a scholar to read to him and keep him entertained occasionally.
12th October, 1677. With Sir Robert Clayton to Marden, an estate he had bought lately of my kinsman, Sir John Evelyn, of Godstone, in Surrey, which from a despicable farmhouse Sir Robert had erected into a seat with extraordinary expense. It is in such a solitude[Pg 120] among hills, as, being not above sixteen miles from London, seems almost incredible, the ways up to it are so winding and intricate. The gardens are large, and well-walled, and the husbandry part made very convenient and perfectly understood. The barns, the stacks of corn, the stalls for cattle, pigeon house, etc., of most laudable example. Innumerable are the plantations of trees, especially walnuts. The orangery and gardens are very curious. In the house are large and noble rooms. He and his lady (who is very curious in distillery) entertained me three or four days very freely. I earnestly suggested to him the repairing of an old desolate dilapidated church, standing on the hill above the house, which I left him in good disposition to do, and endow it better; there not being above four or five houses in the parish, besides that of this prodigious rich Scrivener. This place is exceedingly sharp in the winter, by reason of the serpentining of the hills: and it wants running water; but the solitude much pleased me. All the ground is so full of wild thyme, marjoram, and other sweet plants, that it cannot be overstocked with bees; I think he had near forty hives of that industrious insect.
12th October, 1677. Went to Marden with Sir Robert Clayton, an estate he had recently purchased from my relative, Sir John Evelyn, of Godstone, in Surrey. Sir Robert transformed a shabby farmhouse into an impressive residence at great expense. It's located in such a secluded area among hills that, despite being only about sixteen miles from London, it seems almost unbelievable; the roads leading to it are so winding and complicated. The gardens are expansive and well-walled, with the agricultural setup being very practical and clearly arranged. The barns, grain stacks, animal stalls, pigeon house, etc., are all excellent examples of proper management. There are countless tree plantations, especially walnuts. The orangery and gardens are quite remarkable. Inside the house, there are large and elegant rooms. He and his wife, who is very knowledgeable about distillation, hosted me very generously for three or four days. I strongly urged him to repair an old, neglected church located on the hill above the house, and I left him in a good mindset to do so and to improve its endowment; there are only about four or five houses in the parish, aside from that of this extremely wealthy scrivener. This place is very chilly in the winter due to the winding hills, and it lacks running water; however, I found the solitude very pleasing. The ground is filled with wild thyme, marjoram, and other fragrant plants, making it perfect for bees; I believe he had nearly forty hives of those industrious insects.
14th October, 1677. I went to church at Godstone, and to see old Sir John Evelyn's DORMITORY, joining to the church, paved with marble, where he and his Lady lie on a very stately monument at length; he in armor of white marble. The inscription is only an account of his particular branch of the family, on black marble.
14th October, 1677. I went to church in Godstone and visited the old Sir John Evelyn's DORM, which is next to the church, paved with marble, where he and his wife rest on a grand monument; he in armor made of white marble. The inscription is just a summary of his specific family branch, on black marble.
15th October, 1677. Returned to London; in the evening, I saw the Prince of Orange, and supped with Lord Ossory.
15th October, 1677. Returned to London; in the evening, I saw the Prince of Orange and had dinner with Lord Ossory.
23d October, 1677. Saw again the Prince of Orange; his marriage with the Lady Mary, eldest daughter to the Duke of York, by Mrs. Hyde, the late Duchess, was now declared.
23rd October, 1677. Saw the Prince of Orange again; his marriage to Lady Mary, the oldest daughter of the Duke of York and Mrs. Hyde, the late Duchess, was just announced.
11th November, 1677. I was all this week composing matters between old Mrs. Howard and Sir Gabriel Sylvius, upon his long and earnest addresses to Mrs. Anne, her second daughter, maid of honor to the Queen. My friend, Mrs. Godolphin (who exceedingly loved the young lady) was most industrious in it, out of pity to the languishing knight; so as though there were great differences[Pg 121] in their years, it was at last effected, and they were married the 13th, in Henry VII.'s Chapel, by the Bishop of Rochester, there being besides my wife and Mrs. Graham, her sister, Mrs. Godolphin, and very few more. We dined at the old lady's, and supped at Mr. Graham's at St. James's.
11th November, 1677. This week, I was busy sorting things out between old Mrs. Howard and Sir Gabriel Sylvius regarding his long and serious intentions towards Mrs. Anne, her second daughter, who is a maid of honor to the Queen. My friend, Mrs. Godolphin (who really cared for the young lady), worked hard on this, feeling sorry for the lovesick knight. Even though there was a significant age gap between them, it all worked out in the end, and they got married on the 13th in Henry VII's Chapel, officiated by the Bishop of Rochester. Besides my wife and Mrs. Graham, her sister, there were only a few others, including Mrs. Godolphin. We had lunch at the old lady's place and dinner at Mr. Graham's in St. James's.
15th November, 1677. The Queen's birthday, a great ball at Court, where the Prince of Orange and his new Princess danced.
15th November, 1677. The Queen's birthday, a big ball at Court, where the Prince of Orange and his new Princess danced.
19th November, 1677. They went away, and I saw embarked my Lady Sylvius, who went into Holland with her husband, made Hoffmaester to the Prince, a considerable employment. We parted with great sorrow, for the great respect and honor I bore her, a most pious and virtuous lady.
19th November, 1677. They left, and I saw Lady Sylvius board the ship. She was heading to Holland with her husband, who was appointed Hoffmaester to the Prince, a significant position. We parted with much sadness, given the great respect and honor I had for her, a truly devout and virtuous woman.
27th November, 1677. Dined at the Lord Treasurer's with Prince Rupert, Viscount Falkenburg, Earl of Bath, Lord O'Brien, Sir John Lowther, Sir Christopher Wren, Dr. Grew, and other learned men.
27th November, 1677. Had dinner at the Lord Treasurer's with Prince Rupert, Viscount Falkenburg, Earl of Bath, Lord O'Brien, Sir John Lowther, Sir Christopher Wren, Dr. Grew, and other knowledgeable individuals.
30th November, 1677. Sir Joseph Williamson, Principal Secretary of State, was chosen President of the Royal Society, after my Lord Viscount Brouncker had possessed the chair now sixteen years successively, and therefore now thought fit to CHANGE, that prescription might not prejudice.
30th November, 1677. Sir Joseph Williamson, Principal Secretary of State, was elected President of the Royal Society, after my Lord Viscount Brouncker had held the position for the past sixteen years, and therefore decided it was time to Update, so that this long tenure would not be seen as a disadvantage.
4th December, 1677. Being the first day of his taking the chair, he gave us a magnificent supper.
4th December, 1677. On his first day in the chair, he treated us to an amazing supper.
20th December, 1677. Carried to my Lord Treasurer an account of the Earl of Bristol's Library, at Wimbledon, which my Lord thought of purchasing, till I acquainted him that it was a very broken collection, consisting much in books of judicial astrology, romances, and trifles.
20th December, 1677. I took to my Lord Treasurer a report on the Earl of Bristol's Library, at Wimbledon, which my Lord was considering buying, until I informed him that it was a very incomplete collection, mostly made up of books on judicial astrology, romances, and trivial items.
25th December, 1677. I gave my son an office, with instructions how to govern his youth; I pray God give him the grace to make a right use of it!
25th December, 1677. I gave my son a position, with guidance on how to manage his young years; I pray God grants him the wisdom to use it well!
23d January, 1677-78. Dined with the Duke of Norfolk, being the first time I had seen him since the death of his elder brother, who died at Padua in Italy, where he had resided above thirty years. The Duke had now newly declared his marriage to his concubine, whom he promised me he never would marry. I went with him to see the Duke of Buckingham, thence to my Lord[Pg 122] Sunderland, now Secretary of State, to show him that rare piece of Vosterman's (son of old Vosterman), which was a view, or landscape of my Lord's palace, etc., at Althorpe in Northamptonshire.
23rd January, 1677-78. I had dinner with the Duke of Norfolk, marking the first time I had seen him since his older brother passed away in Padua, Italy, where he had lived for over thirty years. The Duke had just announced his marriage to his mistress, whom he had promised me he would never marry. I went with him to visit the Duke of Buckingham, then to my Lord[Pg 122] Sunderland, who is now Secretary of State, to show him that rare painting by Vosterman (son of the late Vosterman), which was a view or landscape of my Lord's palace, etc., at Althorpe in Northamptonshire.
8th February, 1678. Supping at my Lord Chamberlain's I had a long discourse with the Count de Castel Mellor, lately Prime Minister in Portugal, who, taking part with his master, King Alphonso, was banished by his brother, Don Pedro, now Regent; but had behaved himself so uncorruptly in all his ministry that, though he was acquitted, and his estate restored, yet would they not suffer him to return. He is a very intelligent and worthy gentleman.
8th February, 1678. Having dinner at my Lord Chamberlain's, I had a lengthy conversation with Count de Castel Mellor, who was recently the Prime Minister of Portugal. He sided with his ruler, King Alphonso, and was exiled by his brother, Don Pedro, who is now the Regent. However, he conducted himself with such integrity during his term that, although he was cleared of any wrongdoing and his property was returned to him, they still wouldn’t allow him to come back. He is a very knowledgeable and respectable man.
18th February, 1678. My Lord Treasurer sent for me to accompany him to Wimbledon, which he had lately purchased of the Earl of Bristol; so breaking fast with him privately in his chamber, I accompanied him with two of his daughters, my Lord Conway, and Sir Bernard Gascoyne; and, having surveyed his gardens and alterations, returned late at night.
18th February, 1678. My Lord Treasurer called me to join him in traveling to Wimbledon, which he had recently bought from the Earl of Bristol. After having breakfast privately with him in his room, I went with him and two of his daughters, my Lord Conway, and Sir Bernard Gascoyne. We looked around his gardens and the changes made, then returned late at night.
22d February, 1678. Dr. Pierce preached at Whitehall, on 2 Thessalonians iii. 6, against our late schismatics, in a rational discourse, but a little over-sharp, and not at all proper for the auditory there.
22nd February, 1678. Dr. Pierce preached at Whitehall, on 2 Thessalonians iii. 6, criticizing our recent schismatics, in a logical talk, but a bit too harsh, and not really suitable for the audience there.
22d March, 1678. Dr. South preached coram Rege, an incomparable discourse on this text, "A wounded spirit who can bear!" Note: Now was our Communion table placed altarwise; the church steeple, clock, and other reparations finished.
22nd March, 1678. Dr. South preached in front of the King, an exceptional sermon on this text, "A wounded spirit who can bear!" Note: Now our Communion table was set up like an altar; the church steeple, clock, and other repairs were completed.
16th April, 1678. I showed Don Emmanuel de Lyra (Portugal Ambassador) and the Count de Castel Mellor, the Repository of the Royal Society, and the College of Physicians.
16th April, 1678. I showed Don Emmanuel de Lyra (Ambassador of Portugal) and Count de Castel Mellor the Repository of the Royal Society and the College of Physicians.
18th April, 1678. I went to see new Bedlam Hospital, magnificently built, and most sweetly placed in Moorfields, since the dreadful fire in London.
18th April, 1678. I went to check out the new Bedlam Hospital, wonderfully constructed and nicely situated in Moorfields, since the terrible fire in London.
28th June, 1678. I went to Windsor with my Lord Chamberlain (the castle now repairing with exceeding cost) to see the rare work of Verrio, an incomparable carving of Gibbons.
28th June, 1678. I went to Windsor with my Lord Chamberlain (the castle is currently undergoing extensive repairs) to see the remarkable work of Verrio, an unmatched carving by Gibbons.
29th June, 1678. Returned with my Lord by Hounslow Heath, where we saw the newly raised army encamped, designed against France, in pretense, at least; but which[Pg 123] gave umbrage to the Parliament. His Majesty and a world of company were in the field, and the whole army in battalia; a very glorious sight. Now were brought into service a new sort of soldiers, called Grenadiers, who were dexterous in flinging hand grenades, everyone having a pouch full; they had furred caps with coped crowns like Janizaries, which made them look very fierce, and some had long hoods hanging down behind, as we picture fools. Their clothing being likewise piebald, yellow and red.
29th June, 1678. I returned with my Lord by Hounslow Heath, where we saw the newly raised army camped out, supposedly aimed at France, but which[Pg 123] upset Parliament. His Majesty and a lot of others were in the field, and the whole army was lined up; it was a very impressive sight. They had introduced a new type of soldier called Grenadiers, skilled at throwing hand grenades, each one carrying a pouch full of them; they wore fur hats with peaked crowns like Janizaries, making them look very fierce, and some had long hoods hanging down the back, like we picture fools. Their clothing was also a mix of yellow and red.
8th July, 1678. Came to dine with me my Lord Longford, Treasurer of Ireland, nephew to that learned gentleman, my Lord Aungier, with whom I was long since acquainted; also the Lady Stidolph, and other company.
8th July, 1678. My Lord Longford, the Treasurer of Ireland and nephew of the knowledgeable Lord Aungier, who I’ve known for quite a while, came to dine with me. Also present were Lady Stidolph and other guests.
19th July, 1678. The Earl of Ossory came to take his leave of me, going into Holland to command the English forces.
19th July, 1678. The Earl of Ossory came to say goodbye to me, heading to Holland to lead the English troops.
20th July, 1678. I went to the Tower to try a metal at the Assay-master's, which only proved sulphur; then saw Monsieur Rotière, that excellent graver belonging to the Mint, who emulates even the ancients, in both metal and stone;38 he was now molding a horse for the King's statue, to be cast in silver, of a yard high. I dined with Mr. Slingsby, Master of the Mint.
20th July, 1678. I went to the Tower to test a metal with the Assay-master, which turned out to be just sulfur; then I met Monsieur Rotière, the outstanding engraver from the Mint, who rivals even the ancients in both metal and stone; 38 he was currently sculpting a horse for the King's statue, which will be cast in silver and stand one yard high. I had dinner with Mr. Slingsby, the Master of the Mint.
23d July, 1678. Went to see Mr. Elias Ashmole's library and curiosities, at Lambeth. He had divers MSS., but most of them astrological, to which study he is addicted, though I believe not learned, but very industrious, as his History of the order of the Garter proves. He showed me a toad included in amber. The prospect from a turret is very fine, it being so near London, and yet not discovering any house about the country. The famous John Tradescant bequeathed his Repository to this gentleman, who has given them to the University of Oxford, and erected a lecture on them, over the laboratory, in imitation of the Royal Society.
23rd July, 1678. I went to visit Mr. Elias Ashmole's library and collection of curiosities in Lambeth. He had several manuscripts, mostly astrological, which he is really into, although I don't think he's particularly learned, just very hardworking, as his History of the Order of the Garter shows. He showed me a toad trapped in amber. The view from a turret is quite stunning, being so close to London yet not revealing any houses around. The famous John Tradescant left his collection to this gentleman, who has donated them to the University of Oxford and set up a lecture series on them above the laboratory, modeling it after the Royal Society.
Mr. Godolphin was made master of the robes to the King.
Mr. Godolphin became the King’s official in charge of the royal garments.
25th July, 1678. There was sent me £70; from whom I knew not, to be by me distributed among poor people; I[Pg 124] afterward found it was from that dear friend (Mrs. Godolphin), who had frequently given me large sums to bestow on charities.
25th July, 1678. I received £70 from an unknown source to be distributed among poor people; I[Pg 124] later found out it was from my dear friend (Mrs. Godolphin), who had often given me large amounts to donate to charity.
16th August, 1678. I went to Lady Mordaunt, who put £100 into my hand to dispose of for pious uses, relief of prisoners, poor, etc. Many a sum had she sent me on similar occasions; a blessed creature she was, and one that loved and feared God exemplarily.
16th August, 1678. I visited Lady Mordaunt, who gave me £100 to allocate for charitable purposes, like helping prisoners and the needy. She had often sent me money for similar causes; she was a truly good person and one who loved and respected God exemplarily.
23d August, 1678. Upon Sir Robert Reading's importunity, I went to visit the Duke of Norfolk, at his new palace at Weybridge, where he has laid out in building near £10,000, on a copyhold, and in a miserable, barren, sandy place by the street side; never in my life had I seen such expense to so small purpose. The rooms are wainscotted, and some of them richly pargeted with cedar, yew, cypress, etc. There are some good pictures, especially that incomparable painting of Holbein's, where the Duke of Norfolk, Charles Brandon and Henry VIII., are dancing with the three ladies, with most amorous countenances, and sprightly motion exquisitely expressed. It is a thousand pities (as I told my Lord of Arundel, his son), that that jewel should be given away.
23rd August, 1678. After Sir Robert Reading insisted, I went to visit the Duke of Norfolk at his new palace in Weybridge, where he has spent nearly £10,000 on a copyhold in a miserable, barren sandy spot by the roadside; I've never seen such expense for such little return. The rooms are paneled, and some of them are richly decorated with cedar, yew, cypress, and more. There are some great paintings, especially that extraordinary piece by Holbein, where the Duke of Norfolk, Charles Brandon, and Henry VIII are dancing with three ladies, all with very affectionate expressions and lively movements beautifully captured. It's a real shame (as I told my Lord of Arundel, his son) that such a treasure is being given away.
24th August, 1678. I went to see my Lord of St. Alban's house, at Byfleet, an old, large building. Thence, to the papermills, where I found them making a coarse white paper. They cull the rags which are linen for white paper, woolen for brown; then they stamp them in troughs to a pap, with pestles, or hammers, like the powder mills, then put it into a vessel of water, in which they dip a frame closely wired with wire as small as a hair and as close as a weaver's reed; on this they take up the pap, the superfluous water draining through the wire; this they dexterously turning, shake out like a pancake on a smooth board between two pieces of flannel, then press it between a great press, the flannel sucking out the moisture; then, taking it out, they ply and dry it on strings, as they dry linen in the laundry; then dip it in alum water, lastly, polish and make it up in quires. They put some gum in the water in which they macerate the rags. The mark we find on the sheets is formed in the wire.
24th August, 1678. I went to visit my Lord of St. Alban's house in Byfleet, which is an old, large building. From there, I went to the paper mills, where I saw them making a rough white paper. They sort the rags—linen for white paper, wool for brown paper; then they crush them in troughs into a pulp, using pestles or hammers, similar to what they do at powder mills. Next, they put it into a vessel of water and dip a frame that's tightly woven with wire as fine as a hair and as close as a weaver's reed; on this, they gather up the pulp, allowing the excess water to drain through the wire. They skillfully flip it over and shake it out like a pancake onto a smooth board between two pieces of flannel, then press it in a large press, with the flannel absorbing the moisture. After that, they hang it up to dry on strings, just like drying linen in a laundry. Then they dip it in alum water, and finally, they polish it and fold it into quires. They add some gum to the water where they soak the rags. The pattern you see on the sheets is created by the wire.
25th August, 1678. After evening prayer, visited Mr. Sheldon (nephew to the late Archbishop of Canterbury),[Pg 125] and his pretty melancholy garden; I took notice of the largest arbor thuyris I had ever seen. The place is finely watered, and there are many curiosities of India, shown in the house.
25th August, 1678. After evening prayer, I visited Mr. Sheldon (nephew of the late Archbishop of Canterbury),[Pg 125] and his beautifully melancholic garden; I noticed the largest arbor thuyris I had ever seen. The place is well-watered, and there are many interesting curiosities from India displayed in the house.
There was at Weybridge the Duchess of Norfolk, Lord Thomas Howard (a worthy and virtuous gentleman, with whom my son was sometime bred in Arundel House), who was newly come from Rome, where he had been some time; also one of the Duke's daughters, by his first lady. My Lord leading me about the house made no scruple of showing me all the hiding places for the Popish priests, and where they said mass, for he was no bigoted Papist. He told me he never trusted them with any secret, and used Protestants only in all businesses of importance.
There was at Weybridge the Duchess of Norfolk, Lord Thomas Howard (a good and honorable man, with whom my son had spent some time at Arundel House), who had just returned from Rome, where he had been for a while; also one of the Duke's daughters, from his first wife. My Lord took me around the house and casually showed me all the hiding spots for Catholic priests, and where they held mass, because he wasn't a strict Catholic. He mentioned that he never trusted them with any secrets and always relied on Protestants for important matters.
I went this evening with my Lord Duke to Windsor, where was a magnificent Court, it being the first time of his Majesty's removing thither since it was repaired.
I went this evening with my Lord Duke to Windsor, where there was a magnificent Court, as it was the first time his Majesty had moved there since it was renovated.
27th August, 1678. I took leave of the Duke, and dined at Mr. Henry Bruncker's, at the Abbey of Sheene, formerly a monastery of Carthusians, there yet remaining one of their solitary cells with a cross. Within this ample inclosure are several pretty villas and fine gardens of the most excellent fruits, especially Sir William Temple's (lately Ambassador into Holland), and the Lord Lisle's, son to the Earl of Leicester, who has divers rare pictures, above all, that of Sir Brian Tuke's, by Holbein.
27th August, 1678. I said goodbye to the Duke and had dinner at Mr. Henry Bruncker's place at the Abbey of Sheene, which used to be a Carthusian monastery. There’s still one of their solitary cells with a cross remaining. Inside this large area, there are several nice villas and beautiful gardens with excellent fruit, especially Sir William Temple's (who was recently an ambassador to Holland) and Lord Lisle's, the son of the Earl of Leicester, who has several unique paintings, particularly one of Sir Brian Tuke by Holbein.
After dinner I walked to Ham, to see the house and garden of the Duke of Lauderdale, which is indeed inferior to few of the best villas in Italy itself; the house furnished like a great Prince's; the parterres, flower-gardens, orangeries, groves, avenues, courts, statues, perspectives, fountains, aviaries, and all this at the banks of the sweetest river in the world, must needs be admirable.
After dinner, I walked to Ham to check out the house and garden of the Duke of Lauderdale, which is actually on par with some of the best villas in Italy. The house is decorated like one fit for a great prince, and the gardens include flower beds, orange groves, tree-lined paths, courtyards, statues, scenic views, fountains, and aviaries. All of this is located by one of the loveliest rivers in the world, making it truly amazing.
Hence, I went to my worthy friend, Sir Henry Capel [at Kew], brother to the Earl of Essex; it is an old timber-house; but his garden has the choicest fruit of any plantation in England, as he is the most industrious and understanding in it.
Hence, I went to my good friend, Sir Henry Capel [at Kew], brother to the Earl of Essex; it's an old wooden house; but his garden has the finest fruit of any plantation in England, as he is the most hardworking and knowledgeable about it.
29th August, 1678. I was called to London to wait upon the Duke of Norfolk, who having at my sole request bestowed the Arundelian Library on the Royal[Pg 126] Society; sent to me to take charge of the books, and remove them, only stipulating that I would suffer the Herald's chief officer, Sir William Dugdale, to have such of them as concerned heraldry and the marshal's office, books of armory and genealogies, the Duke being Earl Marshal of England. I procured for our Society, besides printed books, near one hundred MSS. some in Greek of great concernment. The printed books being of the oldest impressions, are not the less valuable; I esteem them almost equal to MSS. Among them, are most of the Fathers, printed at Basil, before the Jesuits abused them with their expurgatory Indexes; there is a noble MS. of Vitruvius. Many of these books had been presented by Popes, Cardinals, and great persons, to the Earls of Arundel and Dukes of Norfolk; and the late magnificent Earl of Arundel bought a noble library in Germany, which is in this collection. I should not, for the honor I bear the family, have persuaded the Duke to part with these, had I not seen how negligent he was of them, suffering the priests and everybody to carry away and dispose of what they pleased; so that abundance of rare things are irrecoverably gone.
29th August, 1678. I was summoned to London to meet with the Duke of Norfolk, who, at my specific request, generously handed over the Arundelian Library to the Royal[Pg 126] Society. He asked me to oversee the books and relocate them, only requiring that the Herald's chief officer, Sir William Dugdale, be allowed to take those that were related to heraldry and the marshal's office—armory books and genealogies—since the Duke holds the title of Earl Marshal of England. For our Society, I secured nearly one hundred manuscripts, some in Greek, which are particularly important, in addition to printed books. The printed books, despite being among the oldest editions, hold significant value; I regard them as nearly equivalent to manuscripts. Included are most of the Church Fathers, printed in Basel, before the Jesuits tainted them with their censorship lists; there’s also a valuable manuscript of Vitruvius. Many of these books were gifts from Popes, Cardinals, and other notable figures to the Earls of Arundel and Dukes of Norfolk. The late magnificent Earl of Arundel acquired an impressive library in Germany, which is part of this collection. For the honor I have for the family, I wouldn't have encouraged the Duke to part with these books had I not noticed his negligence towards them, allowing priests and others to take and dispose of whatever they wanted, resulting in the loss of many rare items that are irretrievably gone.
Having taken order here, I went to the Royal Society to give them an account of what I had procured, that they might call a Council and appoint a day to wait on the Duke to thank him for this munificent gift.
Having taken care of things here, I went to the Royal Society to inform them about what I had acquired, so they could call a meeting and set a date to visit the Duke to thank him for this generous gift.
3d September, 1678. I went to London, to dine with Mrs. Godolphin, and found her in labor; she was brought to bed of a son, who was baptized in the chamber, by the name of Francis, the susceptors being Sir William Godolphin (head of the family), Mr. John Hervey, Treasurer to the Queen, and Mrs. Boscawen, sister to Sir William and the father.
3rd September, 1678. I went to London to have dinner with Mrs. Godolphin and found her in labor; she gave birth to a son, who was baptized in the room, named Francis, with Sir William Godolphin (head of the family), Mr. John Hervey, Treasurer to the Queen, and Mrs. Boscawen, sister to Sir William, as the sponsors.
8th September, 1678. While I was at church came a letter from Mr. Godolphin, that my dear friend his lady was exceedingly ill, and desiring my prayers and assistance. My wife and I took boat immediately, and went to Whitehall, where, to my inexpressible sorrow, I found she had been attacked with a new fever, then reigning this excessive hot autumn, and which was so violent, that it was not thought she could last many hours.
8th September, 1678. While I was at church, I received a letter from Mr. Godolphin, saying that my dear friend, his wife, was very ill and asking for my prayers and help. My wife and I took a boat right away and went to Whitehall, where, to my deep sorrow, I found out that she had been struck down by a new fever, which was prevalent during this extremely hot autumn, and it was so severe that it was believed she wouldn’t survive for many hours.
9th September, 1678. She died in the 26th year of her age, to the inexpressible affliction of her dear husband,[Pg 127] and all her relations, but of none in the world more than of myself, who lost the most excellent and inestimable friend that ever lived. Never was a more virtuous and inviolable friendship; never a more religious, discreet, and admirable creature, beloved of all, admired of all, for all possible perfections of her sex. She is gone to receive the reward of her signal charity, and all other her Christian graces, too blessed a creature to converse with mortals, fitted as she was, by a most holy life, to be received into the mansions above. She was for wit, beauty, good nature, fidelity, discretion, and all accomplishments, the most incomparable person. How shall I ever repay the obligations to her for the infinite good offices she did my soul by so often engaging me to make religion the terms and tie of the friendship there was between us! She was the best wife, the best mistress, the best friend, that ever husband had. But it is not here that I pretend to give her character, HAVING DESIGNED TO CONSECRATE HER WORTHY LIFE TO POSTERITY.
9th September, 1678. She died at the age of 26, leaving her dear husband,[Pg 127] and all her family in deep sorrow, especially me, as I lost the most remarkable and priceless friend anyone could ever have. There was never a more virtuous and unwavering friendship; she was truly a religious, wise, and admirable person, loved and admired by everyone for every possible quality of her gender. She has gone to receive the reward for her exceptional kindness and all her other Christian virtues, too blessed a person to engage with the living, suited as she was, by her holy life, to be welcomed into the heavenly realms. In terms of intelligence, beauty, kindness, loyalty, discretion, and all other attributes, she was simply unmatched. How will I ever repay her for the countless good deeds she did for my soul by constantly encouraging me to make our friendship rooted in faith? She was the best wife, the best partner, the best friend any husband could ask for. But I’m not here to define her character, HAVING PLANNED TO DEDICATE HER VALUABLE LIFE TO FUTURE GENERATIONS.
Her husband, struck with unspeakable affliction, fell down as dead. The King himself, and all the Court, expressed their sorrow. To the poor and miserable, her loss was irreparable; for there was no degree but had some obligation to her memory. So careful and provident was she to be prepared for all possible accidents, that (as if she foresaw her end) she received the heavenly viaticum but the Sunday before, after a most solemn recollection. She put all her domestic concerns into the exactest order, and left a letter directed to her husband, to be opened in case she died in childbed, in which with the most pathetic and endearing expressions of the most loyal and virtuous wife, she begs his kindness to her memory might be continued by his care and esteem of those she left behind, even to her domestic servants, to the meanest of which she left considerable legacies, as well as to the poor. It was now seven years since she was maid of honor to the Queen, that she regarded me as a father, a brother, and what is more, a friend. We often prayed, visited the sick and miserable, received, read, discoursed, and communicated in all holy offices together. She was most dear to my wife, and affectionate to my children. But she is gone! This only is my comfort, that she is happy in Christ, and I shall[Pg 128] shortly behold her again. She desired to be buried in the dormitory of his family, near three hundred miles from all her other friends. So afflicted was her husband at this severe loss, that the entire care of her funeral was committed to me. Having closed the eyes, and dropped a tear upon the cheek of my dear departed friend, lovely even in death, I caused her corpse to be embalmed and wrapped in lead, a plate of brass soldered thereon, with an inscription, and other circumstances due to her worth, with as much diligence and care as my grieved heart would permit me; I then retired home for two days, which were spent in solitude and sad reflection.
Her husband, overwhelmed by unbearable grief, collapsed as if dead. The King and the entire Court shared in their sorrow. For the poor and unfortunate, her loss was devastating; everyone had some reason to honor her memory. She was so diligent and prepared for any eventuality that, as if she anticipated her end, she received the sacrament just the Sunday before, after a deeply reflective time. She organized all her household matters meticulously and left a letter for her husband, to be opened in case she died during childbirth. In this letter, with heartfelt and endearing words from a loyal and virtuous wife, she asks him to care for her memory and continue to show kindness to those she left behind, even her household staff. She also made sure to leave generous legacies to them and to the poor. It had been seven years since she served as maid of honor to the Queen, and she considered me a father, a brother, and even a friend. We often prayed, visited the sick, and engaged in all holy duties together. She was very dear to my wife and cared deeply for my children. But now she is gone! My only comfort is knowing that she is at peace in Christ, and I will see her again soon. She wished to be buried in her family’s dormitory, nearly three hundred miles away from all her other friends. Her husband was so devastated by this profound loss that he entrusted all the arrangements for her funeral to me. After closing the eyes and shedding a tear on the cheek of my beloved friend, still beautiful in death, I had her body embalmed and encased in lead, with a brass plate attached that bore an inscription and other details befitting her worth, all done with as much care and diligence as my sorrowful heart allowed. I then went home for two days, which I spent in solitude and deep reflection.
17th September, 1678. She was, accordingly, carried to Godolphin, in Cornwall, in a hearse with six horses, attended by two coaches of as many, with about thirty of her relations and servants. There accompanied the hearse her husband's brother, Sir William, two more of his brothers, and three sisters; her husband was so overcome with grief, that he was wholly unfit to travel so long a journey, till he was more composed. I went as far as Hounslow with a sad heart; but was obliged to return upon some indispensable affairs. The corpse was ordered to be taken out of the hearse every night, and decently placed in the house, with tapers about it, and her servants attending, to Cornwall; and then was honorably interred in the parish church of Godolphin. This funeral cost not much less than £1,000.
17th September, 1678. She was taken to Godolphin, in Cornwall, in a hearse pulled by six horses, accompanied by two coaches with six horses each, along with about thirty relatives and servants. Her husband’s brother, Sir William, two more of his brothers, and three sisters went with the hearse; her husband was so overwhelmed with grief that he couldn't travel such a long distance until he felt more composed. I traveled as far as Hounslow with a heavy heart but had to turn back due to some urgent matters. The body was taken out of the hearse every night and respectfully placed in a home with candles around it, attended by her servants, until it reached Cornwall; she was then honorably laid to rest in the parish church of Godolphin. This funeral cost nearly £1,000.
With Mr. Godolphin, I looked over and sorted his lady's papers, most of which consisted of Prayers, Meditations, Sermon-notes, Discourses, and Collections on several religious subjects, and many of her own happy composing, and so pertinently digested, as if she had been all her life a student in divinity. We found a diary of her solemn resolutions, tending to practical virtue, with letters from select friends, all put into exact method. It astonished us to see what she had read and written, her youth considered.
With Mr. Godolphin, I went through and organized his lady’s papers, most of which were Prayers, Meditations, Sermon notes, Discourses, and Collections on various religious topics, along with many of her own well-composed pieces, thoughtfully arranged as if she had been studying theology her entire life. We discovered a diary of her serious resolutions aimed at practical virtue, along with letters from close friends, all neatly organized. It amazed us to see the amount she had read and written, especially considering her youth.
1st October, 1678. The Parliament and the whole Nation were alarmed about a conspiracy of some eminent Papists for the destruction of the King and introduction of Popery, discovered by one Oates and Dr. Tongue,39[Pg 129] WHICH LAST I KNEW, BEING THE TRANSLATOR OF THE "Jesuits' Morals"; I went to see and converse with him at Whitehall, with Mr. Oates, one that was lately an apostate to the church of Rome, and now returned again with this discovery. He seemed to be a bold man, and, in my thoughts, furiously indiscreet; but everybody believed what he said; and it quite changed the genius and motions of the Parliament, growing now corrupt and interested with long sitting and court practices; but, with all this, Popery would not go down. This discovery turned them all as one man against it, and nothing was done but to find out the depth of this. Oates was encouraged, and everything he affirmed taken for gospel; the truth is, the Roman Catholics were exceedingly bold and busy everywhere, since the Duke forbore to go any longer to the chapel.
1st October, 1678. The Parliament and the entire nation were alarmed by a conspiracy of some prominent Catholics aimed at the destruction of the King and the establishment of Catholicism, uncovered by Oates and Dr. Tongue,39[Pg 129] LAST I KNEW, I WAS THE TRANSLATOR OF THE __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ "Jesuits' Morals"; I went to meet and talk with him at Whitehall, along with Mr. Oates, who had recently converted from the Catholic Church and had now returned again with this discovery. He seemed to be a bold man and, in my opinion, recklessly indiscreet; but everyone believed what he said. This completely shifted the attitude and actions of Parliament, which was becoming corrupt and politically motivated after long sessions and court practices; yet, despite all this, Catholicism was not accepted. This discovery united them all against it, and nothing was done but to explore the details of this conspiracy. Oates was encouraged, and everything he claimed was taken as truth; the reality was that Catholics were becoming very bold and active everywhere since the Duke stopped attending the chapel.
16th October, 1678. Mr. Godolphin requested me to continue the trust his wife had reposed in me, in behalf of his little son, conjuring me to transfer the friendship I had for his dear wife, on him and his.
16th October, 1678. Mr. Godolphin asked me to keep the trust that his wife had placed in me for his little son, urging me to extend the affection I had for his beloved wife to him and his family.
21st October, 1678. The murder of Sir Edmondbury[Pg 130] Godfrey, found strangled about this time, as was manifest, by the Papists, he being the Justice of the Peace, and one who knew much of their practices, as conversant with Coleman (a servant of the ... now accused), put the whole nation into a new ferment against them.
21st October, 1678. The murder of Sir Edmondbury[Pg 130] Godfrey, who was found strangled around this time, clearly at the hands of the Catholics, since he was a Justice of the Peace and was familiar with their activities, as he was close with Coleman (a servant of the ... now accused), stirred up the entire nation against them.
31st October, 1678. Being the 58th of my age, required my humble addresses to Almighty God, and that he would take off his heavy hand, still on my family; and restore comforts to us after the death of my excellent friend.
31st October, 1678. Since I have turned 58, I felt the need to humbly pray to God, asking Him to lift the heavy burden still resting on my family and to bring us comfort after the loss of my dear friend.
5th November, 1678. Dr. Tillotson preached before the Commons at St. Margaret's. He said the Papists were now arrived at that impudence, as to deny that there ever was any such as the gunpowder-conspiracy; but he affirmed that he himself had several letters written by Sir Everard Digby (one of the traitors), in which he gloried that he was to suffer for it; and that it was so contrived, that of the Papists not above two or three should have been blown up, and they, such as were not worth saving.
5th November, 1678. Dr. Tillotson preached before the Commons at St. Margaret's. He stated that the Catholics had become so bold as to deny that the gunpowder conspiracy ever existed; however, he insisted that he had several letters written by Sir Everard Digby (one of the traitors), in which he boasted about suffering for it. He added that the plan was arranged so that no more than two or three Catholics would be blown up, and they were the ones who weren’t worth saving.
15th November, 1678. The Queen's birthday. I never saw the Court more brave, nor the nation in more apprehension and consternation. Coleman and one Staly had now been tried, condemned, and executed. On this, Oates grew so presumptuous as to accuse the Queen of intending to poison the King; which certainly that pious and virtuous lady abhorred the thoughts of, and Oates's circumstances made it utterly unlikely in my opinion. He probably thought to gratify some who would have been glad his Majesty should have married a fruitful lady; but the King was too kind a husband to let any of these make impression on him. However, divers of the Popish peers were sent to the Tower, accused by Oates; and all the Roman Catholic lords were by a new Act forever excluded the Parliament; which was a mighty blow. The King's, Queen's, and Duke's servants, were banished, and a test to be taken by everybody who pretended to enjoy any office of public trust, and who would not be suspected of Popery. I went with Sir William Godolphin, a member of the Commons' House, to the Bishop of Ely (Dr. Peter Gunning), to be resolved whether masses were idolatry, as the text expressed it,[Pg 131] which was so worded, that several good Protestants scrupled, and Sir William, though a learned man and excellent divine himself, had some doubts about it. The Bishop's opinion was that he might take it, though he wished it had been otherwise worded in the text.
15th November, 1678. The Queen's birthday. I have never seen the Court look more splendid, nor the nation more anxious and unsettled. Coleman and a man named Staly had now been tried, found guilty, and executed. Because of this, Oates became so bold as to accuse the Queen of plotting to poison the King; which, without a doubt, that pious and virtuous woman could never have considered, and in my opinion, Oates's claims made it completely implausible. He probably thought it would please some people who would have been happy if His Majesty had married a fertile woman; but the King was too kind a husband to let any of this affect him. However, several Catholic lords were sent to the Tower, accused by Oates; and all Roman Catholic lords were permanently excluded from Parliament by a new Act, which was a heavy blow. The King's, Queen's, and Duke's servants were banished, and a loyalty test was required for anyone who wanted to hold a public office and not be suspected of being Catholic. I went with Sir William Godolphin, a member of the House of Commons, to see the Bishop of Ely (Dr. Peter Gunning) to find out whether masses were considered idolatry, as the text stated, [Pg 131] which was phrased in a way that several good Protestants found troubling, and Sir William, despite being a knowledgeable and excellent theologian himself, had some doubts about it. The Bishop's view was that he could accept it, though he wished it had been worded differently in the text.
15th January, 1678-79. I went with my Lady Sunderland to Chelsa, and dined with the Countess of Bristol [her mother] in the great house, formerly the Duke of Buckingham's, a spacious and excellent place for the extent of ground and situation in a good air. The house is large but ill-contrived, though my Lord of Bristol, who purchased it after he sold Wimbledon to my Lord Treasurer, expended much money on it. There were divers pictures of Titian and Vandyke, and some of Bassano, very excellent, especially an Adonis and Venus, a Duke of Venice, a butcher in his shambles selling meat to a Swiss; and of Vandyke, my Lord of Bristol's picture, with the Earl of Bedford's at length, in the same table. There was in the garden a rare collection of orange trees, of which she was pleased to bestow some upon me.
15th January, 1678-79. I went with Lady Sunderland to Chelsea and had lunch with the Countess of Bristol [her mother] in the large house that used to belong to the Duke of Buckingham, which is a spacious and nice place due to its size and good location. The house is big but poorly designed, even though Lord Bristol, who bought it after selling Wimbledon to the Lord Treasurer, spent a lot of money on it. There were various paintings by Titian and Vandyke, as well as some by Bassano, all very impressive, especially a painting of Adonis and Venus, a Duke of Venice, and a butcher at his stall selling meat to a Swiss. Also by Vandyke, there was a portrait of Lord Bristol alongside one of the Earl of Bedford displayed together. In the garden, there was a unique collection of orange trees, and she kindly gave me some.
16th January, 1679. I supped this night with Mr. Secretary at one Mr. Houblon's, a French merchant, who had his house furnished en Prince, and gave us a splendid entertainment.
16th January, 1679. I had dinner tonight with Mr. Secretary at the home of Mr. Houblon, a French merchant, who had his house decorated like royalty and treated us to a wonderful feast.
25th January, 1679. The Long Parliament, which had sat ever since the Restoration, was dissolved by persuasion of the Lord Treasurer, though divers of them were believed to be his pensioner. At this, all the politicians were at a stand, they being very eager in pursuit of the late plot of the Papists.
25th January, 1679. The Long Parliament, which had been in session since the Restoration, was dissolved due to the influence of the Lord Treasurer, despite the belief that several members were on his payroll. This left all the politicians at a loss, as they were very eager to investigate the recent conspiracy by the Catholics.
30th January, 1679. Dr. Cudworth preached before the King at Whitehall, on 2 Timothy iii. 5, reckoning up the perils of the last times, in which, among other wickedness, treasons should be one of the greatest, applying it to the occasion, as committed under a form of reformation and godliness; concluding that the prophecy did intend more particularly the present age, as one of the last times; the sins there enumerated, more abundantly reigning than ever.
30th January, 1679. Dr. Cudworth preached before the King at Whitehall, on 2 Timothy iii. 5, listing the dangers of the last days, in which, among other evils, treason would be one of the worst, relating it to the current situation, as carried out under the guise of reform and righteousness; concluding that the prophecy was specifically referring to the present age, as one of the last days; the sins mentioned there are more prevalent than ever.
2d February, 1679. Dr. Durell, Dean of Windsor, preached to the household at Whitehall, on 1 Cor. xvi. 22; he read the whole sermon out of his notes, which I[Pg 132] had never before seen a Frenchman do, he being of Jersey, and bred at Paris.
2nd February, 1679. Dr. Durell, Dean of Windsor, preached to the household at Whitehall, on 1 Cor. xvi. 22; he read the entire sermon from his notes, which I[Pg 132] had never seen a Frenchman do before, as he is from Jersey and was educated in Paris.
4th February, 1679. Dr. Pierce, Dean of Salisbury, preached on 1 John, iv. 1, "Try the Spirits, there being so many delusory ones gone forth of late into the world"; he inveighed against the pernicious doctrines of Mr. Hobbes.
4th February, 1679. Dr. Pierce, Dean of Salisbury, preached on 1 John, iv. 1, "Test the spirits, since there have been so many misleading ones coming into the world lately"; he condemned the harmful teachings of Mr. Hobbes.
My brother Evelyn, was now chosen Knight for the County of Surrey, carrying it against my Lord Longford and Sir Adam Brown, of Bechworth Castle. The country coming in to give him their suffrages were so many, that I believe they ate and drank him out near £2,000, by a most abominable custom.
My brother Evelyn was now selected as Knight for the County of Surrey, competing against my Lord Longford and Sir Adam Brown of Bechworth Castle. The people who came out to support him were so numerous that I believe they drained nearly £2,000 from him through a pretty awful custom.
1st April, 1679. My friend, Mr. Godolphin, was now made one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, and of the Privy Council.
1st April, 1679. My friend, Mr. Godolphin, was appointed as one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury and of the Privy Council.
4th April, 1679. The Bishop of Gloucester preached in a manner very like Bishop Andrews, full of divisions, and scholastical, and that with much quickness. The Holy Communion followed.
4th April, 1679. The Bishop of Gloucester preached in a way that closely resembled Bishop Andrews, full of subdivisions and scholarly insights, delivered with great enthusiasm. The Holy Communion followed.
20th April, 1679. Easter day. Our vicar preached exceedingly well on 1 Cor. v. 7. The Holy Communion followed, at which I and my daughter, Mary (now about fourteen years old), received for the first time. The Lord Jesus continue his grace unto her, and improve this blessed beginning!
20th April, 1679. Easter Sunday. Our vicar gave an excellent sermon on 1 Cor. v. 7. The Holy Communion followed, during which my daughter, Mary (who is now around fourteen years old), and I received for the first time. May the Lord Jesus continue to bless her and enhance this wonderful beginning!
24th April, 1679. The Duke of York, voted against by the Commons for his recusancy, went over to Flanders; which made much discourse.
24th April, 1679. The Duke of York, who was rejected by the Commons for his refusal to conform, went to Flanders; this sparked a lot of conversation.
4th June, 1679. I dined with Mr. Pepys in the Tower, he having been committed by the House of Commons for misdemeanors in the Admiralty when he was secretary; I believe he was unjustly charged. Here I saluted my Lords Stafford and Petre, who were committed for the Popish plot.
4th June, 1679. I had dinner with Mr. Pepys in the Tower, as he had been detained by the House of Commons for misconduct in the Admiralty when he was secretary; I think he was wrongly accused. Here, I greeted my Lords Stafford and Petre, who were imprisoned for the Popish plot.
7th June, 1679. I saw the magnificent cavalcade and entry of the Portugal Ambassador.
7th June, 1679. I witnessed the splendid procession and arrival of the Portugal Ambassador.
17th June, 1679. I was godfather to a son of Sir Christopher Wren, surveyor of his Majesty's buildings, that most excellent and learned person, with Sir William Fermor, and my Lady Viscountess Newport, wife of the Treasurer of the Household.
17th June, 1679. I was the godfather to a son of Sir Christopher Wren, the surveyor of the King’s buildings, that brilliant and knowledgeable man, along with Sir William Fermor and my Lady Viscountess Newport, the wife of the Treasurer of the Household.
Thence to Chelsea, to Sir Stephen Fox, and my lady,[Pg 133] in order to the purchase of the Countess of Bristol's house there, which she desired me to procure a chapman for.
Thence to Chelsea, to Sir Stephen Fox and my lady,[Pg 133] to discuss the purchase of the Countess of Bristol's house there, which she asked me to find a buyer for.
19th June, 1679. I dined at Sir Robert Clayton's with Sir Robert Viner, the great banker.
19th June, 1679. I had dinner at Sir Robert Clayton's with Sir Robert Viner, the prominent banker.
22d June, 1679. There were now divers Jesuits executed about the plot, and a rebellion in Scotland of the fanatics, so that there was a sad prospect of public affairs.
22d June, 1679. Several Jesuits were executed in connection with the plot, and there was a rebellion in Scotland led by the extremists, leading to a grim outlook for public affairs.
25th June, 1679. The new Commissioners of the Admiralty came to visit me, viz, Sir Henry Capell, brother to the Earl of Essex, Mr. Finch, eldest son to the Lord Chancellor, Sir Humphry Winch, Sir Thomas Meeres, Mr. Hales, with some of the Commissioners of the Navy. I went with them to London.
25th June, 1679. The new Commissioners of the Admiralty came to see me, including Sir Henry Capell, brother of the Earl of Essex, Mr. Finch, the eldest son of the Lord Chancellor, Sir Humphry Winch, Sir Thomas Meeres, Mr. Hales, and some of the Commissioners of the Navy. I accompanied them to London.
1st July, 1679. I dined at Sir William Godolphin's, and with that learned gentleman went to take the air in Hyde Park, where was a glorious cortège.
1st July, 1679. I had dinner at Sir William Godolphin's, and with that knowledgeable gentleman, I went for a walk in Hyde Park, where there was a dazzling cortège.
3d July, 1679. Sending a piece of venison to Mr. Pepys, still a prisoner, I went and dined with him.
3rd July, 1679. I sent some venison to Mr. Pepys, who is still in prison, and then I went to have dinner with him.
6th July, 1679. Now were there papers, speeches, and libels, publicly cried in the streets against the Dukes of York and Lauderdale, etc., obnoxious to the Parliament, with too much and indeed too shameful a liberty; but the people and Parliament had gotten head by reason of the vices of the great ones.
6th July, 1679. There were now papers, speeches, and slander openly shouted in the streets against the Dukes of York and Lauderdale, among others, who were unpopular with Parliament, showing an excessively shameful freedom; however, the people and Parliament had gained momentum due to the faults of the powerful.
There was now brought up to London a child, son of one Mr. Wotton, formerly amanuensis to Dr. Andrews, Bishop of Winton, who both read and perfectly understood Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Arabic, Syriac, and most of the modern languages; disputed in divinity, law, and all the sciences; was skillful in history, both ecclesiastical and profane; in politics; in a word, so universally and solidly learned at eleven years of age, that he was looked on as a miracle. Dr. Lloyd, one of the most deeply learned divines of this nation in all sorts of literature, with Dr. Burnet, who had severely examined him, came away astonished, and they told me they did not believe there had the like appeared in the world. He had only been instructed by his father, who being himself a learned person, confessed that his son knew all that he himself knew. But, what was more admirable than his vast memory, was his judgment and invention, he being tried with divers hard questions, which required maturity of[Pg 134] thought and experience. He was also dexterous in chronology, antiquities, mathematics. In sum, an intellectus universalis, beyond all that we read of Picus Mirandula, and other precocious wits, and yet withal a very humble child.
A child was brought to London, the son of Mr. Wotton, who used to be the assistant to Dr. Andrews, the Bishop of Winton. This child could read and fully understand Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Arabic, Syriac, and most modern languages. He debated theology, law, and various sciences; he was knowledgeable in both church and secular history, as well as in politics. At just eleven years old, he was so incredibly learned that people considered him a miracle. Dr. Lloyd, one of the most educated scholars in this country across all types of literature, along with Dr. Burnet, who had rigorously tested him, left astonished and said they didn’t believe anyone like him had ever existed. He had only been taught by his father, who was also learned and admitted that his son knew everything he knew. However, what was even more impressive than his remarkable memory was his judgment and creativity. He was challenged with various difficult questions that needed maturity of thought and experience. He was also skilled in chronology, antiquities, and mathematics. In short, he was an intellectus universalis, surpassing everything we read about Picus Mirandula and other prodigies, yet he remained a very humble child.
14th July, 1679. I went to see how things stood at Parson's Green, my Lady Viscountess Mordaunt (now sick in Paris, whither she went for health) having made me a trustee for her children, an office I could not refuse to this most excellent, pious, and virtuous lady, my long acquaintance.
14th July, 1679. I went to check on things at Parson's Green, as my Lady Viscountess Mordaunt (now ill in Paris, where she went for her health) had appointed me as a trustee for her children, a responsibility I couldn’t decline for this most excellent, caring, and virtuous lady, who I have known for a long time.
15th July, 1679. I dined with Mr. Sidney Godolphin, now one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury.
15th July, 1679. I had lunch with Mr. Sidney Godolphin, now one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury.
18th July, 1679. I went early to the Old Bailey Sessions House, to the famous trial of Sir George Wakeman, one of the Queen's physicians, and three Benedictine monks; the first (whom I was well acquainted with, and take to be a worthy gentleman abhorring such a fact), for intending to poison the King; the others as accomplices to carry on the plot, to subvert the government, and introduce Popery. The bench was crowded with the judges, Lord Mayor justices, and innumerable spectators. The chief accusers, Dr. Oates (as he called himself), and one Bedlow, a man of inferior note. Their testimonies were not so pregnant, and I fear much of it from hearsay, but swearing positively to some particulars, which drew suspicion upon their truth; nor did circumstances so agree, as to give either the bench or jury so entire satisfaction as was expected. After, therefore, a long and tedious trial of nine hours, the jury brought them in not guilty, to the extraordinary triumph of the Papists, and without sufficient disadvantage and reflections on witnesses, especially Oates and Bedlow.
18th July, 1679. I went early to the Old Bailey Sessions House for the famous trial of Sir George Wakeman, one of the Queen's physicians, and three Benedictine monks; the first (whom I was well acquainted with and considered a decent man who would never be involved in such a thing) for allegedly trying to poison the King; the others as accomplices in the scheme to destabilize the government and promote Catholicism. The courtroom was packed with judges, the Lord Mayor, and countless spectators. The main accusers were Dr. Oates (as he called himself) and a less notable man named Bedlow. Their testimonies weren’t very compelling, and I suspect a lot of it was based on hearsay, although they did swear to certain details, which raised doubts about their credibility; the circumstances also didn’t align enough to provide the court or jury with the complete assurance they had hoped for. After a long and exhausting trial lasting nine hours, the jury found them not guilty, much to the delight of the Catholics, and insufficient negative impact on the witnesses, particularly Oates and Bedlow.
This was a happy day for the lords in the Tower, who, expecting their trial, had this gone against the prisoners at the bar, would all have been in the utmost hazard. For my part, I look on Oates as a vain, insolent man, puffed up with the favor of the Commons for having discovered something really true, more especially as detecting the dangerous intrigue of Coleman, proved out of his own letters, and of a general design which the Jesuited party of the Papists ever had and still have, to ruin the Church of England; but that he was trusted[Pg 135] with those great secrets he pretended, or had any solid ground for what he accused divers noblemen of, I have many reasons to induce my contrary belief. That among so many commissions as he affirmed to have delivered to them from P. Oliva40 and the Pope,—he who made no scruple of opening all other papers, letters, and secrets, should not only not open any of those pretended commissions, but not so much as take any copy or witness of any one of them, is almost miraculous. But the Commons (some leading persons I mean of them) had so exalted him that they took all he said for Gospel, and without more ado ruined all whom he named to be conspirators; nor did he spare whoever came in his way. But, indeed, the murder of Sir Edmundbury Godfrey, suspected to have been compassed by the Jesuits' party for his intimacy with Coleman (a busy person whom I also knew), and the fear they had that he was able to have discovered things to their prejudice, did so exasperate not only the Commons, but all the nation, that much of these sharpnesses against the more honest Roman Catholics who lived peaceably, is to be imputed to that horrid fact.
This was a happy day for the lords in the Tower, who, if the trial had gone against the prisoners, would have been in serious danger. Personally, I see Oates as a vain and arrogant man, inflated by the support of the Commons for having uncovered something genuinely true, particularly his exposure of Coleman’s dangerous schemes, proven through his own letters. This also highlights the long-standing plot of the Jesuit faction among the Catholics to undermine the Church of England. However, I have many reasons to doubt that he was truly entrusted with the significant secrets he claimed, or had solid grounds for accusing various noblemen. It’s almost miraculous that among the numerous commissions he claimed to have delivered to them from P. Oliva and the Pope, he, who had no qualms about sharing all other documents, didn’t reveal any of those alleged commissions or even take a copy or witness of any of them. The Commons—some prominent members, that is—had elevated him to such an extent that they accepted everything he said as gospel, carelessly destroying everyone he labeled as conspirators without hesitation. He didn’t hesitate to target anyone who crossed his path. Indeed, the murder of Sir Edmundbury Godfrey, suspected to have been orchestrated by the Jesuits due to his close ties with Coleman (a rather active individual whom I also knew), and their fear that he could expose their wrongdoings, angered not only the Commons but the entire nation. Much of the hostility directed at the more honest Catholics who lived peacefully can be attributed to that horrific act.
The sessions ended, I dined or rather supped (so late it was) with the judges in the large room annexed to the place, and so returned home. Though it was not my custom or delight to be often present at any capital trials, we having them commonly so exactly published by those who take them in short-hand, yet I was inclined to be at this signal one, that by the ocular view of the carriages and other circumstances of the managers and parties concerned, I might inform myself, and regulate my opinion of a cause that had so alarmed the whole nation.
The sessions wrapped up, and I had dinner—or more like a late meal—with the judges in the large room attached to the venue before heading home. While I usually didn't enjoy attending major trials, especially since they were typically well-documented by shorthand reporters, I felt drawn to this particular one. I hoped to gain a better understanding and form my opinion based on the visible details, like the carriages and other aspects involving the people involved, about a case that had caused such a stir across the nation.
22d July, 1679. Dined at Clapham, at Sir D. Gauden's; went thence with him to Windsor, to assist him in a business with his Majesty. I lay that night at Eton College, the Provost's lodgings (Dr. Craddock), where I was courteously entertained.
22nd July, 1679. Had lunch at Clapham, at Sir D. Gauden's; then went with him to Windsor to help him with a matter for his Majesty. I stayed that night at Eton College, in the Provost's lodgings (Dr. Craddock), where I was kindly hosted.
23d July, 1679. To Court: after dinner, I visited that excellent painter, Verrio, whose works in fresco in the King's palace, at Windsor, will celebrate his name as long as those walls last. He showed us his pretty garden,[Pg 136] choice flowers, and curiosities, he himself being a skillful gardener.
23rd July, 1679. To Court: after lunch, I visited the amazing painter, Verrio, whose fresco works in the King's palace at Windsor will keep his name alive as long as those walls stand. He showed us his lovely garden,[Pg 136] beautiful flowers, and interesting items, as he is also a talented gardener.
I went to Clifden, that stupendous natural rock, wood, and prospect, of the Duke of Buckingham's, and buildings of extraordinary expense. The grots in the chalky rocks are pretty: it is a romantic object, and the place altogether answers the most poetical description that can be made of solitude, precipice, prospect, or whatever can contribute to a thing so very like their imaginations. The stand, somewhat like Frascati as to its front, and on the platform is a circular view to the utmost verge of the horizon, which, with the serpenting of the Thames, is admirable. The staircase is for its materials singular; the cloisters, descents, gardens, and avenue through the wood, august and stately; but the land all about wretchedly barren, and producing nothing but fern. Indeed, as I told his Majesty that evening (asking me how I liked Clifden) without flattery, that it did not please me so well as Windsor for the prospect and park, which is without compare; there being but one only opening, and that narrow, which led one to any variety; whereas that of Windsor is everywhere great and unconfined.
I went to Clifden, this amazing place with natural rocks, trees, and views, owned by the Duke of Buckingham, along with lavish buildings. The grottos in the chalky rocks are nice; it’s a romantic spot, and the whole place fits the most poetic description of solitude, cliffs, scenery, or anything that looks like what people dream about. The structure somewhat resembles Frascati in its front, and from the platform, there’s a round view all the way to the horizon, which, with the winding Thames, is impressive. The staircase is unique because of its materials; the cloisters, descents, gardens, and path through the woods are grand and stately, but the land around is sadly barren and only grows ferns. In fact, as I mentioned to his Majesty that evening when he asked how I liked Clifden, I said honestly that it didn’t impress me as much as Windsor did for the view and park, which is incomparable; there’s only one narrow opening here that offers any variety, while at Windsor, the vistas are vast and open everywhere.
Returning, I called at my cousin Evelyn's, who has a very pretty seat in the forest, two miles by hither Clifden, on a flat, with gardens exquisitely kept, though large, and the house a staunch good old building, and what was singular, some of the rooms floored dove tail-wise without a nail, exactly close. One of the closets is pargeted with plain deal, set in diamond, exceeding staunch and pretty.
Returning, I stopped by my cousin Evelyn's place, which is a really nice spot in the forest, about two miles from Clifden. It has beautifully maintained gardens, and the house is a solid old structure. What's unique is that some of the rooms have dovetail flooring with no nails, perfectly fitted together. One of the closets is paneled with plain wood arranged in a diamond pattern, very sturdy and attractive.
7th August, 1679. Dined at the Sheriff's, when, the Company of Drapers and their wives being invited, there was a sumptuous entertainment, according to the forms of the city, with music, etc., comparable to any prince's service in Europe.
7th August, 1679. Had dinner at the Sheriff's, where the Company of Drapers and their wives were invited. There was an extravagant feast, in line with the city's traditions, complete with music and everything, rivaling the level of service you’d find at any prince's court in Europe.
8th August, 1679. I went this morning to show my Lord Chamberlain, his Lady, and the Duchess of Grafton, the incomparable work of Mr. Gibbon, the carver, whom I first recommended to his Majesty, his house being furnished like a cabinet, not only with his own work, but divers excellent paintings of the best hands. Thence, to Sir Stephen Fox's, where we spent the day.
8th August, 1679. I went this morning to show my Lord Chamberlain, his Lady, and the Duchess of Grafton the amazing work of Mr. Gibbon, the carver, whom I first recommended to his Majesty. His house is set up like a gallery, filled not only with his own work but also with various excellent paintings from the best artists. After that, I went to Sir Stephen Fox's, where we spent the day.
31st August, 1679. After evening service, to see a[Pg 137] neighbor, one Mr. Bohun, related to my son's late tutor of that name, a rich Spanish merchant, living in a neat place, which he has adorned with many curiosities, especially several carvings of Mr. Gibbons, and some pictures by Streeter.
31st August, 1679. After evening service, I went to visit a[Pg 137] neighbor, Mr. Bohun, who is related to my son's late tutor of the same name. He is a wealthy Spanish merchant living in a nice place that he has decorated with many curiosities, especially several carvings by Mr. Gibbons and some paintings by Streeter.
13th September, 1679. To Windsor, to congratulate his Majesty on his recovery; I kissed the Duke's hand, now lately returned from Flanders41 to visit his brother the King, on which there were various bold and foolish discourses, the Duke of Monmouth being sent away.
13th September, 1679. I went to Windsor to congratulate His Majesty on his recovery; I shook the Duke’s hand, who had just returned from Flanders41 to visit his brother the King. There were various bold and foolish discussions about this, especially since the Duke of Monmouth had been sent away.
19th September, 1679. My Lord Sunderland, one of the principal Secretaries of State, invited me to dinner, where was the King's natural son, the Earl of Plymouth, the Earl of Shrewsbury, Earl of Essex, Earl of Mulgrave, Mr. Hyde, and Mr. Godolphin. After dinner I went to prayers at Eton, and visited Mr. Henry Godolphin, fellow there, and Dr. Craddock.
19th September, 1679. My Lord Sunderland, one of the main Secretaries of State, invited me to dinner, along with the King's illegitimate son, the Earl of Plymouth, the Earl of Shrewsbury, the Earl of Essex, the Earl of Mulgrave, Mr. Hyde, and Mr. Godolphin. After dinner, I went to pray at Eton and visited Mr. Henry Godolphin, a fellow there, and Dr. Craddock.
25th September, 1679. Mr. Slingsby and Signor Verrio came to dine with me, to whom I gave China oranges off my own trees, as good, I think, as were ever eaten.
25th September, 1679. Mr. Slingsby and Signor Verrio came over for dinner, and I served them China oranges from my own trees, which I believe are as good as any that have ever been tasted.
6th October, 1679. A very wet and sickly season.
6th October, 1679. A very rainy and unhealthy time.
23d October, 1679. Dined at my Lord Chamberlain's, the King being now newly returned from his Newmarket recreations.
23rd October, 1679. Had dinner at my Lord Chamberlain's, the King having just returned from his Newmarket activities.
4th November, 1679. Dined at the Lord Mayor's; and, in the evening, went to the funeral of my pious, dear, and ancient learned friend, Dr. Jasper Needham, who was buried at St. Bride's Church. He was a true and holy Christian, and one who loved me with great affection. Dr. Dove preached with an eulogy due to his memory. I lost in this person one of my dearest remaining sincere friends.
4th November, 1679. Had dinner at the Lord Mayor's; and, in the evening, attended the funeral of my dear, godly, and scholarly friend, Dr. Jasper Needham, who was laid to rest at St. Bride's Church. He was a genuine and devout Christian, and someone who cared for me deeply. Dr. Dove delivered a eulogy honoring his memory. In losing him, I lost one of my closest and most sincere friends.
5th November, 1679. I was invited to dine at my Lord Teviotdale's, a Scotch Earl, a learned and knowing nobleman. We afterward went to see Mr. Montague's new palace near Bloomsbury, built by our curator, Mr. Hooke, somewhat after the French; it was most nobly furnished, and a fine, but too much exposed garden.42
5th November, 1679. I was invited to dinner at Lord Teviotdale's, a Scottish Earl, a knowledgeable and cultured nobleman. Afterward, we went to see Mr. Montague's new palace near Bloomsbury, built by our curator, Mr. Hooke, somewhat in the French style; it was beautifully furnished, and had a nice, though overly exposed, garden.42
6th November, 1679. Dined at the Countess of Sun[Pg 138]derland's, and was this evening at the remarriage of the Duchess of Grafton to the Duke (his Majesty's natural son), she being now twelve years old. The ceremony was performed in my Lord Chamberlain's (her father's) lodgings at Whitehall by the Bishop of Rochester, his Majesty being present. A sudden and unexpected thing, when everybody believed the first marriage would have come to nothing; but, the measure being determined, I was privately invited by my Lady, her mother, to be present. I confess I could give her little joy, and so I plainly told her, but she said the King would have it so, and there was no going back. This sweetest, most hopeful, most beautiful, child, and most virtuous, too, was sacrificed to a boy that had been rudely bred, without anything to encourage them but his Majesty's pleasure. I pray God the sweet child find it to her advantage, who, if my augury deceive me not, will in a few years be such a paragon as were fit to make the wife of the greatest Prince in Europe! I staid supper, where his Majesty sat between the Duchess of Cleveland (the mother of the Duke of Grafton) and the sweet Duchess the bride; there were several great persons and ladies, without pomp. My love to my Lord Arlington's family, and the sweet child made me behold all this with regret, though as the Duke of Grafton affects the sea, to which I find his father intends to use him, he may emerge a plain, useful and robust officer: and were he polished, a tolerable person; for he is exceedingly handsome, by far surpassing any of the King's other natural issue.
6th November, 1679. Had dinner at the Countess of Sunderland's, and this evening attended the remarriage of the Duchess of Grafton to the Duke (his Majesty's illegitimate son), who is now twelve years old. The ceremony took place in my Lord Chamberlain's (her father's) rooms at Whitehall, conducted by the Bishop of Rochester, with the King present. It was a sudden and unexpected event, especially since everyone thought the first marriage would fall apart; however, once the decision was made, I received a private invitation from her mother to attend. I must admit I could offer her little joy, and I told her so, but she insisted the King had decided, and there was no turning back. This sweetest, most hopeful, most beautiful child, also the most virtuous, was sacrificed to a boy who had been poorly raised, with nothing motivating them other than the King's wishes. I pray God that the beautiful child finds this to her benefit, as, if my instincts are correct, she will in a few years become such a paragon that she would befit the wife of the greatest Prince in Europe! I stayed for supper, where the King sat between the Duchess of Cleveland (the mother of the Duke of Grafton) and the lovely bride, the Duchess; there were several noble individuals and ladies present, but without any ostentation. My regards to Lord Arlington's family, and the sweet child made me view all this with sadness. Although the Duke of Grafton is inclined towards the sea, which I gather his father plans to use him for, he may emerge as a straightforward, useful, and sturdy officer; if refined, he could be a respectable person, as he is extremely handsome, far surpassing any of the King's other illegitimate children.
8th November, 1679. At Sir Stephen Fox's, and was agreeing for the Countess of Bristol's house at Chelsea, within £500.
8th November, 1679. At Sir Stephen Fox's, and discussing the agreement for the Countess of Bristol's house in Chelsea, for around £500.
18th November, 1679. I dined at my Lord Mayor's, being desired by the Countess of Sunderland to carry her thither on a solemn day, that she might see the pomp and ceremony of this Prince of Citizens, there never having been any, who for the stateliness of his palace, prodigious feasting, and magnificence, exceeded him. This Lord Mayor's acquaintance had been from the time of his being apprentice to one Mr. Abbot, his uncle, who being a scrivener, and an honest worthy man, one who was condemned to die at the beginning of the troubles forty years past, as concerned in the commission of[Pg 139] array for King Charles I. had escaped with his life; I often used his assistance in money matters. Robert Clayton, then a boy, his nephew, became, after his uncle Abbot's death, so prodigiously rich and opulent, that he was reckoned one of the wealthiest citizens. He married a free-hearted woman, who became his hospitable disposition; and having no children, with the accession of his partner and fellow apprentice, who also left him his estate, he grew excessively rich. He was a discreet magistrate, and though envied, I think without much cause. Some believed him guilty of hard dealing, especially with the Duke of Buckingham, much of whose estate he had swallowed, but I never saw any ill by him, considering the trade he was of. The reputation and known integrity of his uncle, Abbot, brought all the royal party to him, by which he got not only great credit, but vast wealth, so as he passed this office with infinite magnificence and honor.
November 18, 1679. I had dinner at the Lord Mayor's, having been invited by the Countess of Sunderland to accompany her on this special day, so she could witness the grandeur and ceremony of this Prince of Citizens. No one has ever surpassed him in the majesty of his palace, lavish feasts, and overall magnificence. The Lord Mayor's connection to my family goes back to his apprenticeship with Mr. Abbot, his uncle, who was a scrivener and a respectable man. He had been sentenced to death at the start of the troubles forty years ago for being involved in a rebellion for King Charles I but managed to escape execution. I often turned to him for help with financial matters. Robert Clayton, who was just a boy then and Abbot’s nephew, became incredibly wealthy after his uncle's death, earning a reputation as one of the richest citizens. He married a generous woman, which complemented his hospitable nature. With no children and the addition of his business partner and fellow apprentice, who also left his estate to him, he became extraordinarily wealthy. He was a wise magistrate, and although some envied him, I think it was without just cause. People suspected him of being harsh in his dealings, particularly with the Duke of Buckingham, from whom he acquired a significant portion of his estate, but I never witnessed any wrongdoing on his part, given his profession. The reputation and integrity of his uncle, Abbot, attracted many from the royal party to him, granting him not just great credit but also immense wealth, allowing him to serve in this office with remarkable magnificence and honor.
20th November, 1679. I dined with Mr. Slingsby, Master of the Mint, with my wife, invited to hear music, which was exquisitely performed by four of the most renowned masters: Du Prue, a Frenchman, on the lute; Signor Bartholomeo, an Italian, on the harpsichord; Nicholao on the violin; but, above all, for its sweetness and novelty, the viol d'amore of five wire strings played on with a bow, being but an ordinary violin, played on lyre-way, by a German. There was also a flute douce, now in much request for accompanying the voice. Mr. Slingsby, whose son and daughter played skillfully, had these meetings frequently in his house.
20th November, 1679. I had dinner with Mr. Slingsby, the Master of the Mint, along with my wife, who was invited to enjoy some music, which was beautifully performed by four of the most famous musicians: Du Prue, a Frenchman, on the lute; Signor Bartholomeo, an Italian, on the harpsichord; Nicholao on the violin; but, above all, the viol d'amore, a five-string instrument played with a bow, which resembled an ordinary violin but was played in a unique style by a German. There was also a flute douce, which is quite popular now for vocal accompaniment. Mr. Slingsby often hosted these gatherings at his home, and his son and daughter played very skillfully.
21st November, 1679. I dined at my Lord Mayor's, to accompany my worthiest and generous friend, the Earl of Ossory; it was on a Friday, a private day, but the feast and entertainment might have become a King. Such an hospitable costume and splendid magistrature does no city in the world show, as I believe.
21st November, 1679. I had dinner at the Lord Mayor's to accompany my esteemed and generous friend, the Earl of Ossory. It was a Friday, a private day, but the feast and entertainment could have easily suited a King. No city in the world, as far as I know, displays such a welcoming atmosphere and impressive leadership.
23d November, 1679. Dr. Allestree preached before the household on St. Luke xi. 2; Dr. Lloyd on Matt. xxiii. 20, before the King, showing with how little reason the Papists applied those words of our blessed Savior to maintain the pretended infallibility they boast of. I never heard a more Christian and excellent discourse; yet were some offended that he seemed to say the Church[Pg 140] of Rome was a true church; but it was a captious mistake; for he never affirmed anything that could be more to their reproach, and that such was the present Church of Rome, showing how much it had erred. There was not in this sermon so much as a shadow for censure, no person of all the clergy having testified greater zeal against the errors of the Papists than this pious and most learned person. I dined at the Bishop of Rochester's, and then went to St. Paul's to hear that great wit, Dr. Sprat, now newly succeeding Dr. Outram, in the cure of St. Margaret's. His talent was a great memory, never making use of notes, a readiness of expression in a most pure and plain style of words, full of matter, easily delivered.
23rd November, 1679. Dr. Allestree preached to the household on St. Luke xi. 2; Dr. Lloyd preached on Matt. xxiii. 20 before the King, demonstrating how poorly the Catholics interpreted those words of our blessed Savior to support the false infallibility they claim. I’ve never heard a more Christian and excellent discourse; however, some were upset that he seemed to imply that the Church of Rome was a true church, but that was a misleading interpretation. He never asserted anything that could be more damaging to them, highlighting how much the current Church of Rome had erred. There was not even a hint of censure in this sermon, and no one among the clergy has shown greater zeal against the errors of the Catholics than this pious and highly educated man. I had lunch at the Bishop of Rochester's and then went to St. Paul's to hear the brilliant Dr. Sprat, who recently took over from Dr. Outram at St. Margaret's. His strength was a great memory, never using notes, with a quickness of expression in a very clear and straightforward style, rich in substance and easily conveyed.
26th November, 1679. I met the Earl of Clarendon with the rest of my fellow executors of the Will of my late Lady Viscountess Mordaunt, namely, Mr. Laurence Hyde, one of the Commissioners of the Treasury, and lately Plenipotentiary-Ambassador at Nimeguen; Andrew Newport; and Sir Charles Wheeler; to examine and audit and dispose of this year's account of the estate of this excellent Lady, according to the direction of her Will.
26th November, 1679. I met the Earl of Clarendon with my fellow executors of the Will of my late Lady Viscountess Mordaunt, namely, Mr. Laurence Hyde, one of the Treasury Commissioners and recently the Plenipotentiary Ambassador at Nijmegen; Andrew Newport; and Sir Charles Wheeler; to review, audit, and manage this year's accounts of the estate of this remarkable Lady, as directed by her Will.
27th November, 1679. I went to see Sir John Stonehouse, with whom I was treating a marriage between my son and his daughter-in-law.
27th November, 1679. I went to meet Sir John Stonehouse, with whom I was discussing a marriage between my son and his daughter-in-law.
28th November, 1679. Came over the Duke of Monmouth from Holland unexpectedly to his Majesty; while the Duke of York was on his journey to Scotland, whither the King sent him to reside and govern. The bells and bonfires of the city at this arrival of the Duke of Monmouth publishing their joy, to the no small regret of some at Court. This Duke, whom for distinction they called the Protestant Duke (though the son of an abandoned woman), the people made their idol.
28th November, 1679. The Duke of Monmouth arrived unexpectedly from Holland to see his Majesty, while the Duke of York was on his way to Scotland, where the King had sent him to live and govern. The bells and bonfires in the city celebrated the Duke of Monmouth's arrival, much to the dismay of some at Court. This Duke, known as the Protestant Duke (even though he was the son of a woman of questionable reputation), became an idol to the people.
4th December, 1679. I dined, together with Lord Ossory and the Earl of Chesterfield, at the Portugal Ambassador's, now newly come, at Cleveland House, a noble palace, too good for that infamous.... The staircase is sumptuous, and the gallery and garden; but, above all, the costly furniture belonging to the Ambassador, especially the rich Japan cabinets, of which I think there were a dozen. There was a billiard table,[Pg 141] with as many more hazards as ours commonly have; the game being only to prosecute the ball till hazarded, without passing the port, or touching the pin; if one miss hitting the ball every time, the game is lost, or if hazarded. It is more difficult to hazard a ball, though so many, than in our table, by reason the bound is made so exactly even, and the edges not stuffed; the balls are also bigger, and they for the most part use the sharp and small end of the billiard stick, which is shod with brass, or silver. The entertainment was exceedingly civil; but, besides a good olio, the dishes were trifling, hashed and condited after their way, not at all fit for an English stomach, which is for solid meat. There was yet good fowls, but roasted to coal, nor were the sweetmeats good.
4th December, 1679. I had dinner with Lord Ossory and the Earl of Chesterfield at the newly arrived Portugal Ambassador's place at Cleveland House, a grand palace that's too nice for that notorious.... The staircase is lavish, along with the gallery and garden; but most impressive were the expensive furnishings owned by the Ambassador, especially the ornate Japan cabinets, of which I think there were about a dozen. There was a billiard table, [Pg 141] with just as many hazards as our usual tables; the aim is just to hit the ball until it goes into a hazard, without crossing the middle area or touching the pin. If you fail to hit the ball every time, you lose the game, or if it goes into a hazard. It's actually harder to get a ball into a hazard, even with so many, than on our tables because the borders are perfectly level, and the edges aren’t padded. The balls are also larger, and they mostly use the thin, pointed end of the cue, which is tipped with brass or silver. The hospitality was very polite; however, aside from a nice mixed dish, the food was quite lacking, prepared in their style, not at all suitable for an English appetite, which prefers substantial dishes. There were decent chickens, but they were burnt to a crisp, and the desserts weren’t good either.
30th December, 1679. I went to meet Sir John Stonehouse, and give him a particular of the settlement on my son, who now made his addresses to the young lady his daughter-in-law, daughter of Lady Stonehouse.
30th December, 1679. I went to meet Sir John Stonehouse and share the details of the settlement for my son, who is now courting the young lady, his daughter-in-law, the daughter of Lady Stonehouse.
25th January, 1679-80. Dr. Cave, author of "Primitive Christianity," etc., a pious and learned man, preached at Whitehall to the household, on James iii. 17, concerning the duty of grace and charity.
25th January, 1679-80. Dr. Cave, the author of "Primitive Christianity" and other works, a devout and knowledgeable man, preached at Whitehall to the household, focusing on James iii. 17, about the importance of grace and charity.
30th January, 1680. I supped with Sir Stephen Fox, now made one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury.
30th January, 1680. I had dinner with Sir Stephen Fox, who is now one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury.
19th February, 1680. The writings for the settling jointure and other contracts of marriage of my son were finished and sealed. The lady was to bring £5,000, in consideration of a settlement of £500 a year present maintenance, which was likewise to be her jointure, and £500 a year after mine and my wife's decease. But, with God's blessing, it will be at the least £1,000 a year more in a few years. I pray God make him worthy of it, and a comfort to his excellent mother, who deserves much from him!
19th February, 1680. The documents for my son's marriage settlement and jointure were completed and signed. The bride was expected to bring £5,000, in exchange for a settlement of £500 a year for current maintenance, which would also be her jointure, and £500 a year after my wife and I pass away. However, with God's blessing, it will be at least £1,000 a year more in a few years. I pray that God makes him deserving of it and a comfort to his wonderful mother, who deserves so much from him!
21st February, 1680. Shrove-Tuesday. My son was married to Mrs. Martha Spencer, daughter to my Lady Stonehouse by a former gentleman, at St. Andrew's, Holborn, by our Vicar, borrowing the church of Dr. Stillingfleet, Dean of St. Paul's, the present incumbent. We afterward dined at a house in Holborn; and, after the solemnity and dancing was done, they were bedded at Sir John Stonehouse's lodgings in Bow Street, Convent Garden.[Pg 142]
21st February, 1680. Pancake Day. My son married Mrs. Martha Spencer, the daughter of my Lady Stonehouse from a previous marriage, at St. Andrew's, Holborn, by our Vicar, using the church of Dr. Stillingfleet, the Dean of St. Paul's, who is the current incumbent. We later had dinner at a house in Holborn; and after the ceremony and dancing were finished, they spent their first night together at Sir John Stonehouse's lodgings in Bow Street, Covent Garden.[Pg 142]
26th February, 1680. To the Royal Society, where I met an Irish Bishop with his Lady, who was daughter to my worthy and pious friend, Dr. Jeremy Taylor, late Bishop of Down and Connor; they came to see the Repository. She seemed to be a knowing woman, beyond the ordinary talent of her sex.
26th February, 1680. To the Royal Society, where I met an Irish Bishop and his wife, who was the daughter of my esteemed and devout friend, Dr. Jeremy Taylor, the late Bishop of Down and Connor; they came to visit the Repository. She appeared to be a knowledgeable woman, surpassing the usual abilities of her gender.
3d March, 1680. I dined at my Lord Mayor's, in order to the meeting of my Lady Beckford, whose daughter (a rich heiress) I had recommended to my brother of Wotton for his only son, she being the daughter of the lady by Mr. Eversfield, a Sussex gentleman.
3rd March, 1680. I had lunch at my Lord Mayor's, to meet with Lady Beckford, whose daughter (a wealthy heiress) I had suggested to my brother at Wotton for his only son, as she is the daughter of the lady by Mr. Eversfield, a gentleman from Sussex.
16th March, 1680. To London, to receive £3,000 of my daughter-in-law's portion, which was paid in gold.
16th March, 1680. To London, to collect £3,000 of my daughter-in-law's dowry, which was given in gold.
26th March, 1680. The Dean of Sarum preached on Jerem. xlv. 5, an hour and a half from his common-place book, of kings and great men retiring to private situations. Scarce anything of Scripture in it.
26th March, 1680. The Dean of Sarum preached on Jerem. xlv. 5, for an hour and a half from his commonplace book, about kings and important figures taking time away for themselves. There was hardly any Scripture in it.
18th April, 1680. On the earnest invitation of the Earl of Essex, I went with him to his house at Cashiobury, in Hertfordshire. It was on Sunday, but going early from his house in the square of St. James, we arrived by ten o'clock; this he thought too late to go to church, and we had prayers in his chapel. The house is new, a plain fabric, built by my friend, Mr. Hugh May. There are divers fair and good rooms, and excellent carving by Gibbons, especially the chimney-piece of the library. There is in the porch, or entrance, a painting by Verrio, of Apollo and the Liberal Arts. One room pargeted with yew, which I liked well. Some of the chimney mantels are of Irish marble, brought by my Lord from Ireland, when he was Lord-Lieutenant, and not much inferior to Italian. The tympanum, or gable, at the front is a bass-relievo of Diana hunting, cut in Portland stone, handsomely enough. I do not approve of the middle doors being round: but, when the hall is finished as designed, it being an oval with a cupola, together with the other wing, it will be a very noble palace. The library is large, and very nobly furnished, and all the books are richly bound and gilded; but there are no MSS., except the Parliament Rolls and Journals, the transcribing and binding of which cost him, as he assured me, £500.
April 18, 1680. At the earnest invitation of the Earl of Essex, I went with him to his house at Cashiobury in Hertfordshire. It was a Sunday, but after leaving his place in St. James's Square early, we arrived by ten o'clock. He thought this was too late to attend church, so we had prayers in his chapel. The house is new, a simple structure built by my friend, Mr. Hugh May. There are several nice rooms and excellent carvings by Gibbons, especially the chimney piece in the library. In the entrance, there's a painting by Verrio of Apollo and the Liberal Arts. I particularly liked one room that was decorated with yew. Some of the chimney mantels are made of Irish marble, which my Lord brought from Ireland when he was Lord-Lieutenant, and they are not much inferior to Italian marble. The tympanum, or gable, at the front features a nice bass-relief of Diana hunting, carved in Portland stone. I don't like the middle doors being round, but once the hall is finished as planned—being an oval with a cupola—along with the other wing, it will be a very impressive palace. The library is large and very nicely furnished, with all the books richly bound and gilded; however, there are no manuscripts except for the Parliament Rolls and Journals, the transcribing and binding of which, he assured me, cost him £500.
No man has been more industrious than this noble[Pg 143] Lord in planting about his seat, adorned with walks, ponds, and other rural elegancies; but the soil is stony, churlish, and uneven, nor is the water near enough to the house, though a very swift and clear stream runs within a flight-shot from it in the valley, which may fitly be called Coldbrook, it being indeed excessively cold, yet producing fair trouts. It is a pity the house was not situated to more advantage: but it seems it was built just where the old one was, which I believe he only meant to repair; this leads men into irremediable errors, and saves but a little.
No man has worked harder than this noble[Pg 143] Lord in landscaping his estate, complete with paths, ponds, and other charming features. However, the soil is rocky, harsh, and uneven, and the water is not close enough to the house, even though there's a fast-flowing, clear stream just a stone's throw away in the valley, aptly named Coldbrook, since it is indeed very cold, yet it produces good trout. It's unfortunate that the house wasn’t built in a better location; it seems it was constructed right where the old one stood, which I believe he only intended to renovate. This leads people into irreversible mistakes and results in minimal gain.
The land about is exceedingly addicted to wood, but the coldness of the place hinders the growth. Black cherry trees prosper even to considerable timber, some being eighty feet long; they make also very handsome avenues. There is a pretty oval at the end of a fair walk, set about with treble rows of Spanish chestnut trees.
The land around is very rich in wood, but the coldness of the area limits growth. Black cherry trees thrive and can grow to be quite large, some reaching eighty feet tall; they also create beautiful avenues. There’s a nice oval at the end of a lovely path, surrounded by triple rows of Spanish chestnut trees.
The gardens are very rare, and cannot be otherwise, having so skillful an artist to govern them as Mr. Cooke, who is, as to the mechanic part, not ignorant in mathematics, and pretends to astrology. There is an excellent collection of the choicest fruit.
The gardens are quite unique, and they can't be anything else, given the skill of the artist managing them, Mr. Cooke, who, when it comes to the mechanics, knows his math and claims to know astrology. There's a fantastic collection of the finest fruits.
As for my Lord, he is a sober, wise, judicious, and pondering person, not illiterate beyond the rate of most noblemen in this age, very well versed in English history and affairs, industrious, frugal, methodical, and every way accomplished. His Lady (being sister of the late Earl of Northumberland) is a wise, yet somewhat melancholy woman, setting her heart too much on the little lady, her daughter, of whom she is over fond. They have a hopeful son at the Academy.
As for my Lord, he is a serious, wise, sensible, and thoughtful person, not less educated than most noblemen today, very knowledgeable about English history and current events, hardworking, thrifty, organized, and skilled in many areas. His Lady (the sister of the late Earl of Northumberland) is a wise, though somewhat sad, woman, who focuses too much on her little daughter, whom she loves excessively. They have a promising son at the Academy.
My Lord was not long since come from his Lord-Lieutenancy of Ireland, where he showed his abilities in administration and government, as well as prudence in considerably augmenting his estate without reproach. He had been Ambassador-extraordinary in Denmark, and, in a word, such a person as became the son of that worthy hero his father to be, the late Lord Capel, who lost his life for King Charles I.
My lord had recently returned from his position as Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, where he demonstrated his skills in administration and governance, as well as his ability to significantly increase his wealth without any criticism. He had served as an extraordinary ambassador in Denmark, and, in short, he was exactly the kind of person worthy of being the son of his esteemed father, the late Lord Capel, who gave his life for King Charles I.
We spent our time in the mornings in walking, or riding, and contriving [alterations], and the afternoons in the library, so as I passed my time for three or four days with[Pg 144] much satisfaction. He was pleased in conversation to impart to me divers particulars of state, relating to the present times. He being no great friend to the D—— was now laid aside, his integrity and abilities being not so suitable in this conjuncture. 21st. I returned to London.
We spent our mornings walking or riding, and making plans, and our afternoons in the library, so I occupied my time for three or four days with[Pg 144] a lot of satisfaction. He enjoyed sharing various details about the current state of affairs during our conversations. Since he was not a big supporter of the D——, he was now sidelined, as his integrity and skills weren't quite a match for the situation. On the 21st, I went back to London.
30th April, 1680. To a meeting of the executors of late Viscountess Mordaunt's estate, to consider of the sale of Parson's Green, being in treaty with Mr. Loftus, and to settle the half year's account.
30th April, 1680. To a meeting of the executors of the late Viscountess Mordaunt's estate, to discuss the sale of Parson's Green, which is currently being negotiated with Mr. Loftus, and to finalize the half-year's account.
1st May, 1680. Was a meeting of the feoffees of the poor of our parish. This year I would stand one of the collectors of their rents, to give example to others. My son was added to the feoffees.
1st May, 1680. There was a meeting of the trustees for the poor of our parish. This year, I decided to be one of the collectors of their rents, to set an example for others. My son was added to the trustees.
This afternoon came to visit me Sir Edward Deering, of Surrendon, in Kent, one of the Lords of the Treasury, with his daughter, married to my worthy friend, Sir Robert Southwell, Clerk of the Council, now Extraordinary-Envoy to the Duke of Brandenburgh, and other Princes in Germany, as before he had been in Portugal, being a sober, wise, and virtuous gentleman.
This afternoon, Sir Edward Deering from Surrendon in Kent, one of the Lords of the Treasury, came to visit me, along with his daughter, who is married to my good friend, Sir Robert Southwell, the Clerk of the Council and now the Extraordinary Envoy to the Duke of Brandenburgh and other princes in Germany. Prior to this, he had served in Portugal and is a serious, wise, and decent man.
13th May, 1680. I was at the funeral of old Mr. Shish, master-shipwright of his Majesty's Yard here, an honest and remarkable man, and his death a public loss, for his excellent success in building ships (though altogether illiterate), and for breeding up so many of his children to be able artists. I held up the pall with three knights, who did him that honor, and he was worthy of it. It was the custom of this good man to rise in the night, and to pray, kneeling in his own coffin, which he had lying by him for many years. He was born that famous year, the Gunpowder-plot, 1605.
May 13, 1680. I attended the funeral of old Mr. Shish, master shipwright at His Majesty's Yard here. He was an honest and remarkable man, and his death is a public loss due to his exceptional success in building ships (despite being completely uneducated) and for training so many of his children to be skilled artisans. I held up the pall alongside three knights who honored him, and he truly deserved it. It was this good man's practice to rise at night and pray, kneeling in his own coffin, which he had kept nearby for many years. He was born in that famous year of the Gunpowder Plot, 1605.
14th June, 1680. Came to dine with us the Countess of Clarendon, Dr. Lloyd, Dean of Bangor (since Bishop of St. Asaph), Dr. Burnet, author of the "History of the Reformation," and my old friend, Mr. Henshaw. After dinner we all went to see the Observatory, and Mr. Flamsted, who showed us divers rare instruments, especially the great quadrant.
14th June, 1680. The Countess of Clarendon, Dr. Lloyd, Dean of Bangor (who later became Bishop of St. Asaph), Dr. Burnet, author of the "History of the Reformation," and my old friend, Mr. Henshaw, joined us for dinner. Afterward, we all went to visit the Observatory, where Mr. Flamsted showed us several rare instruments, particularly the large quadrant.
24th July, 1680. Went with my wife and daughter to Windsor, to see that stately court, now near finished. There was erected in the court the King on horseback, lately cast in copper, and set on a rich pedestal of white[Pg 145] marble, the work of Mr. Gibbons, at the expense of Toby Rustate, a page of the back stairs, who by his wonderful frugality had arrived to a great estate in money, and did many works of charity, as well as this of gratitude to his master, which cost him £1,000. He is very simple, ignorant, but honest and loyal creature.
24th July, 1680. I went with my wife and daughter to Windsor to see the impressive court, which is almost completed. In the courtyard, there was a statue of the King on horseback, recently cast in copper and placed on an ornate pedestal made of white[Pg 145] marble. This was the work of Mr. Gibbons, funded by Toby Rustate, a page to the royal household. Through his remarkable frugality, he accumulated a significant fortune and has done many charitable acts, including this one as a tribute to his master, which cost him £1,000. He is quite simple-minded, uneducated, but an honest and loyal person.
We all dined at the Countess of Sunderland's, afterward to see Signor Verrio's garden, thence to Eton College, to salute the provost, and heard a Latin speech of one of the alumni (it being at the election) and were invited to supper; but took our leave, and got to London that night in good time.
We all had dinner at the Countess of Sunderland's, then went to see Signor Verrio's garden, and from there to Eton College to greet the provost. We listened to a Latin speech from one of the alumni (since it was election time) and were invited to have supper, but we said our goodbyes and made it back to London that night in plenty of time.
26th July, 1680. My most noble and illustrious friend, the Earl of Ossory, espying me this morning after sermon in the privy gallery, calling to me, told me he was now going his journey (meaning to Tangier, whither he was designed Governor, and General of the forces, to regain the losses we had lately sustained from the Moors, when Inchiquin was Governor). I asked if he would not call at my house (as he always did whenever he went out of England on any exploit). He said he must embark at Portsmouth, "wherefore let you and me dine together to-day; I am quite alone, and have something to impart to you; I am not well, shall be private, and desire your company."
26th July, 1680. My esteemed friend, the Earl of Ossory, spotted me this morning after the sermon in the private gallery. He called out to me and said he was about to leave on his journey (heading to Tangier, where he was appointed Governor and General of the forces to recover the recent losses we suffered from the Moors while Inchiquin was Governor). I asked if he would stop by my house (as he always did whenever he left England for an expedition). He replied that he had to depart from Portsmouth, "so let’s have dinner together today; I’m completely alone, and I have something to share with you; I’m not feeling well, I need some privacy, and I would appreciate your company."
Being retired to his lodgings, and set down on a couch, he sent to his secretary for the copy of a letter which he had written to Lord Sunderland (Secretary of State), wishing me to read it; it was to take notice how ill he resented it, that he should tell the King before Lord Ossory's face, that Tangier was not to be kept, but would certainly be lost, and yet added that it was fit Lord Ossory should be sent, that they might give some account of it to the world, meaning (as supposed) the next Parliament, when all such miscarriages would probably be examined; this Lord Ossory took very ill of Lord Sunderland, and not kindly of the King, who resolving to send him with an incompetent force, seemed, as his Lordship took it, to be willing to cast him away, not only on a hazardous adventure, but in most men's opinion, an impossibility, seeing there was not to be above 300 or 400 horse, and 4,000 foot for the garrison and all, both to defend the town, form a camp, repulse the enemy,[Pg 146] and fortify what ground they should get in. This touched my Lord deeply, that he should be so little considered as to put him on a business in which he should probably not only lose his reputation, but be charged with all the miscarriage and ill success; whereas, at first they promised 6,000 foot and 600 horse effective.
Once he was back in his room and settled on a couch, he asked his secretary for a copy of a letter he had written to Lord Sunderland (the Secretary of State), wanting me to read it. The letter pointed out how upset he was that Lord Sunderland told the King, right in front of Lord Ossory, that Tangier shouldn’t be kept and would definitely be lost. Yet, he added that it was appropriate for Lord Ossory to be sent so they could explain the situation to the public, which was assumed to mean the next Parliament, where all such failures would likely be scrutinized. Lord Ossory was very offended by Lord Sunderland's remarks and also not pleased with the King, who, deciding to send him with an insufficient force, seemed, as Lord Ossory understood it, to be willing to send him off to a dangerous mission that many believed was impossible. There would only be about 300 or 400 cavalry and 4,000 infantry available for the garrison and everything else needed to defend the town, set up a camp, repel the enemy, and fortify any ground they could secure. This deeply affected Lord Ossory, making him feel so undervalued as to be put in a position where he might not only lose his reputation but also be blamed for any failures and setbacks, especially since they had originally promised 6,000 infantry and 600 cavalry to be fully effective.
My Lord, being an exceedingly brave and valiant person, and who had so approved himself in divers signal battles, both at sea and land; so beloved and so esteemed by the people, as one they depended on, upon all occasions worthy of such a captain;—he looked on this as too great an indifference in his Majesty, after all his services, and the merits of his father, the Duke of Ormond, and a design of some who envied his virtue. It certainly took so deep root in his mind, that he who was the most void of fear in the world (and assured me he would go to Tangier with ten men if his Majesty commanded him) could not bear up against this unkindness. Having disburdened himself of this to me after dinner, he went with his Majesty to the sheriffs at a great supper in Fishmongers' Hall; but finding himself ill, took his leave immediately of his Majesty, and came back to his lodging. Not resting well this night, he was persuaded to remove to Arlington House, for better accommodation. His disorder turned to a malignant fever, which increasing, after all that six of the most able physicians could do, he became delirious, with intervals of sense, during which Dr. Lloyd (after Bishop of St. Asaph) administered the Holy Sacrament, of which I also participated. He died the Friday following, the 30th of July, to the universal grief of all that knew or heard of his great worth, nor had any a greater loss than myself. Oft would he say I was the oldest acquaintance he had in England (when his father was in Ireland), it being now of about thirty years, contracted abroad, when he rode in the Academy in Paris, and when we were seldom asunder.
My Lord, being an incredibly brave and courageous person, who had proven himself in various notable battles, both at sea and on land; so loved and respected by the people, who relied on him in every situation worthy of such a leader;—he saw this as a significant lack of regard from his Majesty, despite all his services, and the accomplishments of his father, the Duke of Ormond, as well as a scheme by some who envied his character. It clearly took such a strong hold on his mind that he, who was the most fearless person in the world (and assured me he would go to Tangier with ten men if his Majesty commanded him), could not cope with this unkindness. After sharing this with me over dinner, he went with his Majesty to meet the sheriffs at a grand supper at Fishmongers' Hall; but feeling unwell, he took his leave from the King and returned to his lodgings. Not sleeping well that night, he was advised to move to Arlington House for better care. His illness developed into a severe fever, which worsened, and despite all that six of the best physicians could do, he became delirious, with moments of clarity, during which Dr. Lloyd (who later became Bishop of St. Asaph) administered the Holy Communion, which I also received. He died the following Friday, the 30th of July, to the deep sorrow of everyone who knew or heard of his great worth, and none suffered a greater loss than I did. He often said I was the oldest friend he had in England (when his father was in Ireland), as we had known each other for about thirty years, having met abroad when he rode at the Academy in Paris, and we were rarely apart.
His Majesty never lost a worthier subject, nor father a better or more dutiful son; a loving, generous, good-natured, and perfectly obliging friend; one who had done innumerable kindnesses to several before they knew it; nor did he ever advance any that were not worthy; no one more brave, more modest; none more humble, sober, and every way virtuous. Unhappy England in this illus[Pg 147]trious person's loss! Universal was the mourning for him, and the eulogies on him; I stayed night and day by his bedside to his last gasp, to close his dear eyes! O sad father, mother, wife, and children! What shall I add? He deserved all that a sincere friend, a brave soldier, a virtuous courtier, a loyal subject, an honest man, a bountiful master, and good Christian, could deserve of his prince and country. One thing more let me note, that he often expressed to me the abhorrence he had of that base and unworthy action which he was put upon, of engaging the Smyrna fleet in time of peace, in which though he behaved himself like a great captain, yet he told me it was the only blot in his life, and troubled him exceedingly. Though he was commanded, and never examined further when he was so, yet he always spoke of it with regret and detestation. The Countess was at the seat of her daughter, the Countess of Derby, about 200 miles off.
His Majesty never lost a more worthy subject, nor a father a better or more devoted son; a loving, generous, good-natured, and incredibly helpful friend; someone who had done countless kindnesses for others before they even realized it; and he never promoted anyone who wasn’t deserving. No one was braver, more modest, or more humble, sober, and virtuous in every way. Unfortunate England in this [Pg 147] illustrious person's loss! There was widespread mourning for him and countless tributes paid. I stayed by his bedside night and day until his last breath to close his beloved eyes! O sad father, mother, wife, and children! What else can I say? He deserved everything a sincere friend, brave soldier, virtuous courtier, loyal subject, honest man, generous master, and good Christian could hope for from his prince and country. One more thing to note is that he often expressed to me his disgust for that base and unworthy act he was forced to take part in, engaging the Smyrna fleet during peacetime. Although he acted like a great captain in that situation, he told me it was the only stain on his life, and it troubled him deeply. Even though he was ordered to do it and was never questioned further, he always spoke of it with regret and revulsion. The Countess was at her daughter’s home, the Countess of Derby, about 200 miles away.
30th August, 1680. I went to visit a French gentleman, one Monsieur Chardin, who having been thrice in the East Indies, Persia, and other remote countries, came hither in our return ships from those parts, and it being reported that he was a very curious and knowing man, I was desired by the Royal Society to salute him in their name, and to invite him to honor them with his company. Sir Joseph Hoskins and Sir Christopher Wren accompanied me. We found him at his lodgings in his eastern habit, a very handsome person, extremely affable, a modest, well-bred man, not inclined to talk wonders. He spoke Latin, and understood Greek, Arabic, and Persian, from eleven years' travels in those parts, whither he went in search of jewels, and was become very rich. He seemed about 36 years of age. After the usual civilities, we asked some account of the extraordinary things he must have seen in traveling over land to those places where few, if any, northern Europeans used to go, as the Black and Caspian Sea, Mingrelia, Bagdad, Nineveh, Persepolis, etc. He told us that the things most worthy of our sight would be, the draughts he had caused to be made of some noble ruins, etc.; for that, besides his own little talent that way, he had carried two good painters with him, to draw landscapes, measure and design the remains of the palace which[Pg 148] Alexander burned in his frolic at Persepolis, with divers temples, columns, relievos, and statues, yet extant, which he affirmed to be sculpture far exceeding anything he had observed either at Rome, in Greece, or in any other part of the world where magnificence was in estimation. He said there was an inscription in letters not intelligible, though entire. He was sorry he could not gratify the curiosity of the Society at present, his things not being yet out of the ship; but would wait on them with them on his return from Paris, whither he was going the next day, but with intention to return suddenly, and stay longer here, the persecution in France not suffering Protestants, and he was one, to be quiet.
30th August, 1680. I went to visit a French gentleman, Monsieur Chardin, who had traveled to the East Indies, Persia, and other distant places three times. He arrived here on our return ships from those regions, and since it was said that he was a highly knowledgeable and curious man, the Royal Society asked me to greet him on their behalf and invite him to join them. Sir Joseph Hoskins and Sir Christopher Wren came with me. We found him at his lodgings, dressed in his Eastern attire, a very handsome man, extremely friendly, a modest and well-mannered individual, not someone prone to exaggerate. He spoke Latin and understood Greek, Arabic, and Persian from eleven years spent traveling in those areas, where he was in search of jewels and had become quite wealthy. He appeared to be about 36 years old. After the usual polite exchanges, we inquired about the extraordinary sights he must have encountered on his overland journey to places few, if any, Northern Europeans usually visit, such as the Black and Caspian Seas, Mingrelia, Bagdad, Nineveh, Persepolis, and so on. He told us that the most remarkable things worth our attention would be the drawings he had commissioned of some noble ruins and other sites; besides his own modest skill in that area, he had brought along two talented painters to capture landscapes, measure, and design the remains of the palace that Alexander burned in his revelry at Persepolis, along with various temples, columns, reliefs, and statues still standing, which he claimed surpassed any sculpture he had seen in Rome, Greece, or any other place where grandiosity was valued. He mentioned there was an inscription in letters that were not decipherable, though complete. He expressed regret that he couldn't satisfy the Society's curiosity at that moment since his belongings had not yet arrived from the ship, but he promised to meet with them upon his return from Paris, where he was headed the next day, intending to come back quickly and stay longer, as the persecution in France did not allow Protestants, of whom he was one, to live peacefully.
He told us that Nineveh was a vast city, now all buried in her ruins, the inhabitants building on the subterranean vaults, which were, as appeared, the first stories of the old city, that there were frequently found huge vases of fine earth, columns, and other antiquities; that the straw which the Egyptians required of the Israelites, was not to burn, or cover the rows of bricks as we use, but being chopped small to mingle with the clay, which being dried in the sun (for they bake not in the furnace) would else cleave asunder; that in Persia are yet a race of Ignicolæ, who worship the sun and the fire as Gods; that the women of Georgia and Mingrelia were universally, and without any compare, the most beautiful creatures for shape, features, and figure, in the world, and therefore the Grand Seignor and Bashaws had had from thence most of their wives and concubines; that there had within these hundred years been Amazons among them, that is to say, a sort or race of valiant women, given to war; that Persia was extremely fertile; he spoke also of Japan and China, and of the many great errors of our late geographers, as we suggested matter for discourse. We then took our leave, failing of seeing his papers; but it was told us by others that indeed he dared not open, or show them, till he had first showed them to the French King; but of this he himself said nothing.
He told us that Nineveh was a huge city, now all buried in ruins, with people building on the underground vaults, which seemed to be the first floors of the old city. He mentioned that large vases made of fine clay, columns, and other antiques were often found there. He explained that the straw the Egyptians demanded from the Israelites wasn't used for burning or covering the rows of bricks like we do; instead, it was chopped up to mix with the clay, which would otherwise crack when dried in the sun (since they didn't bake in a furnace). He also mentioned that in Persia, there is still a group called Ignicolæ, who worship the sun and fire as gods. He described the women of Georgia and Mingrelia as being, without comparison, the most beautiful people in the world in terms of shape, features, and figure, which is why the Grand Seignor and Bashaws had gotten many of their wives and concubines from there. He noted that in the past hundred years, there had been Amazons among them, a sort of brave women who were warriors. He remarked on the extreme fertility of Persia, and spoke about Japan and China, as well as the many major mistakes of our recent geographers, as we brought up topics for discussion. We then said our goodbyes, missing the chance to see his papers; however, others told us that he indeed dared not open or show them until he had first shown them to the French King, but he himself said nothing about that.
2d September, 1680. I had an opportunity, his Majesty being still at Windsor, of seeing his private library at Whitehall, at my full ease. I went with expectation of finding some curiosities, but, though there were about 1,000 volumes, there were few of importance which I had[Pg 149] not perused before. They consisted chiefly of such books as had from time to time been dedicated, or presented to him; a few histories, some Travels and French books, abundance of maps and sea charts, entertainments and pomps, buildings and pieces relating to the navy, some mathematical instruments; but what was most rare, were three or four Romish breviaries, with a great deal of miniature and monkish painting and gilding, one of which is most exquisitely done, both as to the figures, grotesques, and compartments, to the utmost of that curious art. There is another in which I find written by the hand of King Henry VII., his giving it to his dear daughter, Margaret, afterward Queen of Scots, in which he desires her to pray for his soul, subscribing his name at length. There is also the process of the philosophers' great elixir, represented in divers pieces of excellent miniature, but the discourse is in high Dutch, a MS. There is another MS. in quarto, of above 300 years old, in French, being an institution of physic, and in the botanical part the plants are curiously painted in miniature; also a folio MS. of good thickness, being the several exercises, as Themes, Orations, Translations, etc., of King Edward VI., all written and subscribed by his own hand, and with his name very legible, and divers of the Greek interleaved and corrected after the manner of schoolboys' exercises, and that exceedingly well and proper; with some epistles to his preceptor, which show that young prince to have been extraordinarily advanced in learning, and as Cardan, who had been in England affirmed, stupendously knowing for his age. There is likewise his journal, no less testifying his early ripeness and care about the affairs of state.
2nd September, 1680. I had the chance, with the King still at Windsor, to explore his private library at Whitehall at my leisure. I went expecting to find some interesting things, but even though there were about 1,000 volumes, there were few significant ones that I hadn't read before. Most of them were books that had been dedicated or presented to him over time; there were a few histories, some travel books and French texts, a lot of maps and sea charts, entertainment works, and items related to the navy, along with some mathematical instruments. The rarest finds were three or four Roman Catholic breviaries, filled with intricate miniature and monastic painting and gilding, one of which was exquisitely done, featuring impressive figures, grotesques, and detailed compartments, showcasing the height of that intricate art. One breviary had a note written by King Henry VII., gifting it to his beloved daughter, Margaret, who later became Queen of Scots, asking her to pray for his soul and signing his name in full. There was also a manuscript illustrating the philosophers' great elixir, depicted in various excellent miniatures, but the text was in high Dutch. Another manuscript, in quarto format and over 300 years old, was a textbook on medicine in French, featuring delicately painted miniatures of plants in the botanical section. Additionally, there was a thick folio manuscript containing various exercises, such as essays, speeches, translations, etc., authored by King Edward VI., all written in his own hand with a clear signature, along with many Greek texts interleaved and corrected in the style of schoolboys' exercises, done exceptionally well. Some letters to his teacher demonstrated that this young prince was extraordinarily advanced in his learning, and as Cardan, who had been in England, noted, impressively knowledgeable for his age. His journal also indicated his early maturity and concern for state affairs.
There are besides many pompous volumes, some embossed with gold, and intaglios on agates, medals, etc. I spent three or four entire days, locked up, and alone, among these books and curiosities. In the rest of the private lodgings contiguous to this, are divers of the best pictures of the great masters, Raphael, Titian, etc., and in my esteem, above all, the "Noli me tangere" of our blessed Savior to Mary Magdalen after his Resurrection, of Hans Holbein; than which I never saw so much reverence and kind of heavenly astonishment expressed in a picture.[Pg 150]
There are also many fancy books, some with gold embossing and engravings on stones, medals, etc. I spent three or four whole days, locked away and alone, surrounded by these books and curiosities. In the other private areas nearby, there are several of the best paintings from the great masters like Raphael and Titian, but the one I admire above all is the "Noli me tangere" of our blessed Savior to Mary Magdalene after his Resurrection by Hans Holbein; I've never seen such reverence and a sense of heavenly wonder captured in a painting.[Pg 150]
There are also divers curious clocks, watches, and pendules of exquisite work, and other curiosities. An ancient woman who made these lodgings clean, and had all the keys, let me in at pleasure for a small reward, by means of a friend.
There are also various interesting clocks, watches, and pendulums of exceptional craftsmanship, along with other curiosities. An elderly woman who kept these lodgings clean and held all the keys allowed me to come in whenever I wanted for a small fee, thanks to a friend.
6th September, 1680. I dined with Sir Stephen Fox, now one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury. This gentleman came first a poor boy from the choir of Salisbury, then he was taken notice of by Bishop Duppa, and afterward waited on my Lord Percy (brother to Algernon, Earl of Northumberland), who procured for him an inferior place among the clerks of the kitchen and Greencloth side, where he was found so humble, diligent, industrious, and prudent in his behavior, that his Majesty being in exile, and Mr. Fox waiting, both the King and Lords about him frequently employed him about their affairs, and trusted him both with receiving and paying the little money they had. Returning with his Majesty to England, after great want and great sufferings, his Majesty found him so honest and industrious, and withal so capable and ready, that, being advanced from clerk of the kitchen to that of the Greencloth, he procured to be paymaster of the whole army, and by his dexterity and punctual dealing he obtained such credit among the bankers, that he was in a short time able to borrow vast sums of them upon any exigence. The continual turning thus of money, and the soldiers' moderate allowance to him for keeping touch with them, did so enrich him, that he is believed to be worth at least £200,000, honestly got and unenvied; which is next to a miracle. With all this he continues as humble and ready to do a courtesy as ever he was.
6th September, 1680. I had dinner with Sir Stephen Fox, now one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury. He started as a poor boy from the choir of Salisbury, then caught the attention of Bishop Duppa, and later served my Lord Percy (brother to Algernon, Earl of Northumberland), who helped him get a junior position among the kitchen clerks and on the Greencloth side. He was so humble, diligent, hardworking, and sensible in his role that, while the King was in exile, Mr. Fox was often called upon for various tasks by both the King and the Lords around him, being trusted with both receiving and paying the little money they had. When he returned to England with his Majesty after enduring great hardship and suffering, the King found him so honest and hardworking, and also so capable and willing, that he advanced him from a kitchen clerk to the Greencloth position and made him the paymaster of the entire army. His skill and reliable dealings earned him such credit with the bankers that he could quickly borrow large sums from them in times of need. The constant flow of money and the soldiers' reasonable payments to him for keeping in touch with them made him so wealthy that he is believed to be worth at least £200,000, earned honestly and without envy, which is almost miraculous. Despite all this, he remains as humble and willing to help as ever.
He is generous, and lives very honorably, of a sweet nature, well-spoken, well-bred, and is so highly in his Majesty's esteem, and so useful, that being long since made a knight, he is also advanced to be one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, and has the reversion of the Cofferer's place after Harry Brouncker. He has married his eldest daughter to my Lord Cornwallis, and gave her £12,000, and restored that entangled family besides. He matched his son to Mrs. Trollop, who brings with her (besides a great sum) near, if not altogether, £2,000 per annum. Sir Stephen's lady (an excellent[Pg 151] woman) is sister to Mr. Whittle, one of the King's chirurgeons. In a word, never was man more fortunate than Sir Stephen; he is a handsome person, virtuous, and very religious.
He is generous and lives honorably, with a kind nature, good manners, and is highly regarded by His Majesty. He is so useful that, after being knighted long ago, he was also appointed as one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury and is next in line for the Cofferer's position after Harry Brouncker. He married his oldest daughter to Lord Cornwallis, giving her £12,000 and helping that troubled family as well. He matched his son with Mrs. Trollop, who brings not only a significant amount of money but also around £2,000 a year. Sir Stephen's wife (an excellent woman) is the sister of Mr. Whittle, one of the King's surgeons. In short, no one has been more fortunate than Sir Stephen; he is a good-looking man, virtuous, and very religious.
23d September, 1680. Came to my house some German strangers and Signor Pietro, a famous musician, who had been long in Sweden in Queen Christina's Court; he sung admirably to a guitar, and had a perfect good tenor and bass, and had set to Italian composure many of Abraham Cowley's pieces which showed extremely well. He told me that in Sweden the heat in some part of summer was as excessive as the cold in winter; so cold, he affirmed, that the streets of all the towns are desolate, no creatures stirring in them for many months, all the inhabitants retiring to their stoves. He spoke high things of that romantic Queen's learning and skill in languages, the majesty of her behavior, her exceeding wit, and that the histories she had read of other countries, especially of Italy and Rome, had made her despise her own. That the real occasion of her resigning her crown was the nobleman's importuning her to marry, and the promise which the Pope had made her of procuring her to be Queen of Naples, which also caused her to change her religion; but she was cheated by his crafty Holiness,43 working on her ambition; that the reason of her killing her secretary at Fontainebleau, was, his revealing that intrigue with the Pope. But, after all this, I rather believe it was her mad prodigality and extreme vanity, which had consumed those vast treasures the great Adolphus, her father, had brought out of Germany during his [campaigns] there and wonderful successes; and that, if she had not voluntarily resigned, as foreseeing the event, the Estates of her kingdom would have compelled her to do so.
23rd September, 1680. Some German strangers and Signor Pietro, a well-known musician who had spent a long time at Queen Christina's Court in Sweden, came to my house. He sang beautifully to a guitar, with a great tenor and bass, and set many of Abraham Cowley's pieces to Italian composition, which turned out really well. He told me that in Sweden, summer heat in some parts was as extreme as winter cold; he claimed it was so cold that for many months, the streets of all the towns were deserted, with no creatures stirring as everyone retreated to their stoves. He praised that romantic Queen's intelligence and language skills, her majestic demeanor, and her sharp wit, saying that the histories she had read about other countries, especially Italy and Rome, had made her look down on her own. He mentioned that the real reason she resigned her crown was the noblemen pestering her to marry and the promise from the Pope that he would make her Queen of Naples, which also led her to change her religion; however, she was deceived by his cunning Holiness, who played on her ambitions. He also noted that her secretary was killed at Fontainebleau because he revealed the intrigue with the Pope. But after all this, I tend to believe it was her crazy extravagance and extreme vanity that had drained the vast treasures her father, the great Adolphus, had brought from Germany during his campaigns and incredible successes, and that if she hadn't resigned voluntarily, anticipating the outcome, the Estates of her kingdom would have forced her to do so.
30th October, 1680. I went to London to be private, my birthday being the next day, and I now arrived at my sixtieth year; on which I began a more solemn survey of my whole life, in order to the making and confirming my peace with God, by an accurate scrutiny of all my actions past, as far as I was able to call them to mind. How difficult and uncertain, yet how necessary a work! The Lord be merciful to me, and accept me![Pg 152] Who can tell how oft he offendeth? Teach me, therefore, so to number my days, that I may apply my heart unto wisdom, and make my calling and election sure. Amen, Lord Jesus!
30th October, 1680. I went to London to be alone since my birthday was the next day, marking my sixtieth year. I started to take a deeper look at my entire life to make and solidify my peace with God, carefully reflecting on all my past actions as much as I could remember. What a difficult and uncertain, yet necessary task! Lord, please be merciful to me and accept me! Who can say how often he sins? Teach me, then, to count my days so that I can focus my heart on wisdom and make my calling and election certain. Amen, Lord Jesus![Pg 152]
31st October, 1680. I spent this whole day in exercises. A stranger preached at Whitehall44 on Luke xvi. 30, 31. I then went to St. Martin's, where the Bishop of St. Asaph preached on 1 Peter iii. 15; the Holy Communion followed, at which I participated, humbly imploring God's assistance in the great work I was entering into. In the afternoon, I heard Dr. Sprat, at St. Margaret's, on Acts xvii. 11.
31st October, 1680. I spent the entire day in activities. A stranger gave a sermon at Whitehall44 based on Luke 16:30, 31. Then I went to St. Martin's, where the Bishop of St. Asaph preached on 1 Peter 3:15. The Holy Communion followed, and I took part, humbly asking for God's help in the significant work I was about to undertake. In the afternoon, I listened to Dr. Sprat at St. Margaret's on Acts 17:11.
I began and spent the whole week in examining my life, begging pardon for my faults, assistance and blessing for the future, that I might, in some sort, be prepared for the time that now drew near, and not have the great work to begin, when one can work no longer. The Lord Jesus help and assist me! I therefore stirred little abroad till the 5th of November, when I heard Dr. Tenison, the now vicar of St. Martin's; Dr. Lloyd, the former incumbent, being made Bishop of St. Asaph.
I started and spent the entire week reflecting on my life, asking for forgiveness for my mistakes, and seeking help and blessings for the future, so I could be somewhat prepared for the time that was approaching, rather than trying to start the important work when it's too late to do so. Lord Jesus, please help and guide me! So, I didn't go out much until November 5th, when I heard Dr. Tenison, the current vicar of St. Martin's; Dr. Lloyd, the previous vicar, had been appointed Bishop of St. Asaph.
7th November, 1680. I participated of the blessed Communion, finishing and confirming my resolutions of giving myself up more entirely to God, to whom I had now most solemnly devoted the rest of the poor remainder of life in this world; the Lord enabling me, who am an unprofitable servant, a miserable sinner, yet depending on his infinite goodness and mercy accepting my endeavors.
7th November, 1680. I took part in the sacred Communion, which completed and strengthened my decision to fully commit myself to God, to whom I had now solemnly dedicated the remaining days of my life in this world. The Lord empowers me, an unworthy servant, a wretched sinner, still relying on His infinite goodness and mercy to accept my efforts.
15th November, 1680. Came to dine with us Sir Richard Anderson, his lady, son and wife, sister to my daughter-in-law.
15th November, 1680. Sir Richard Anderson, his wife, their son and his wife, who is my daughter-in-law's sister, came over for dinner.
30th November, 1680. The anniversary election at the Royal Society brought me to London, where was chosen President that excellent person and great philosopher, Mr. Robert Boyle, who indeed ought to have been the very first; but neither his infirmity nor his modesty could now any longer excuse him. I desired I might for this year be left out of the Council, by reason my dwelling was in the country. The Society according to custom dined together.
30th November, 1680. The annual election at the Royal Society took me to London, where the outstanding individual and great philosopher, Mr. Robert Boyle, was elected President, a role he truly deserved to have held from the beginning; however, neither his health issues nor his modesty could serve as an excuse any longer. I requested to be excluded from the Council this year due to my residence being in the countryside. As per tradition, the Society had a joint dinner.
The signal day begun the trial (at which I was present)[Pg 153] of my Lord Viscount Stafford, (for conspiring the death of the King), second son to my Lord Thomas Howard, Earl of Arundel and Surrey, Earl Marshal of England, and grandfather to the present Duke of Norfolk, whom I so well knew, and from which excellent person I received so many favors. It was likewise his birthday, The trial was in Westminster Hall, before the King, Lords, and Commons, just in the same manner as, forty years past, the great and wise Earl of Strafford (there being but one letter differing their names) received his trial for pretended ill government in Ireland, in the very same place, this Lord Stafford's father being then High Steward. The place of sitting was now exalted some considerable height from the paved floor of the hall, with a stage of boards. The throne, woolsacks for the Judges, long forms for the Peers, chair for the Lord Steward, exactly ranged, as in the House of Lords. The sides on both hands scaffolded to the very roof for the members of the House of Commons. At the upper end, and on the right side of the King's state, was a box for his Majesty, and on the left others for the great ladies, and over head a gallery for ambassadors and public ministers. At the lower end, or entrance, was a bar, and place for the prisoner, the Lieutenant of the Tower of London, the ax-bearer and guards, my Lord Stafford's two daughters, the Marchioness of Winchester being one; there was likewise a box for my Lord to retire into. At the right hand, in another box, somewhat higher, stood the witnesses; at the left, the managers, in the name of the Commons of England, namely, Serjeant Maynard (the great lawyer, the same who prosecuted the cause against the Earl of Strafford forty years before, being now near eighty years of age), Sir William Jones, late Attorney-General, Sir Francis Winnington, a famous pleader, and Mr. Treby, now Recorder of London, not appearing in their gowns as lawyers, but in their cloaks and swords, as representing the Commons of England: to these were joined Mr. Hampden, Dr. Sacheverell, Mr. Poule, Colonel Titus, Sir Thomas Lee, all gentlemen of quality, and noted parliamentary men. The first two days, in which were read the commission and impeachment, were but a tedious entrance into matter of fact, at which I was but little present. But, on Thursday, I was commodiously[Pg 154] seated among the Commons, when the witnesses were sworn and examined. The principal witnesses were Mr. Oates (who called himself Dr.), Mr. Dugdale, and Turberville. Oates swore that he delivered a commission to Viscount Stafford from the Pope, to be Paymaster-General to an army intended to be raised; Dugdale, that being at Lord Aston's, the prisoner dealt with him plainly to murder his Majesty; and Turberville, that at Paris he also proposed the same to him.
The trial of Lord Viscount Stafford, who was accused of plotting the King's death, began on that significant day, and I was there. He was the second son of Lord Thomas Howard, the Earl of Arundel and Surrey, and the Earl Marshal of England, and he was the grandfather of the current Duke of Norfolk, whom I knew well and received many favors from. Coincidentally, it was also his birthday. The trial took place in Westminster Hall, in front of the King, the Lords, and the Commons, just like the trial of the great and wise Earl of Strafford forty years earlier (with only one letter difference in their names) for alleged poor governance in Ireland, which happened in the same place, with Lord Stafford’s father serving as High Steward at that time. The seating area was raised significantly above the hall’s paved floor, built on a wooden platform. The throne, woolsacks for the judges, long benches for the peers, and a chair for the Lord Steward were all arranged just like in the House of Lords. Both sides were scaffolded up to the roof for the House of Commons members. At the upper end, to the right of the King’s position, there was a box for his Majesty, while to the left were boxes for prominent ladies, and above, there was a gallery for ambassadors and public ministers. At the lower end, or entrance, there was a bar, and a place for the prisoner, along with the Lieutenant of the Tower of London, the ax-bearer, and guards, as well as Lord Stafford’s two daughters, one of whom was the Marchioness of Winchester; there was also a box for Lord Stafford to retreat to. On the right side, in another box slightly higher up, stood the witnesses; on the left were the prosecutors representing the Commons of England: Serjeant Maynard, the prominent lawyer who had prosecuted the Earl of Strafford forty years before and was now nearly eighty; Sir William Jones, the former Attorney-General; Sir Francis Winnington, a well-known lawyer; and Mr. Treby, currently the Recorder of London. They appeared not in their gowns as lawyers but in cloaks and swords to represent the Commons of England. They were joined by gentlemen of quality and noted parliamentary figures, including Mr. Hampden, Dr. Sacheverell, Mr. Poule, Colonel Titus, and Sir Thomas Lee. The first two days, during which the commission and impeachment were read, were just a tedious prelude to the facts, and I was mostly absent. However, on Thursday, I was comfortably seated among the Commons when the witnesses were sworn in and examined. The main witnesses were Mr. Oates (who referred to himself as Dr.), Mr. Dugdale, and Turberville. Oates testified that he delivered a commission from the Pope to Viscount Stafford to be the Paymaster-General of an army that was intended to be raised; Dugdale claimed that while at Lord Aston's, the prisoner straightforwardly asked him to murder the King; and Turberville said that in Paris, Stafford similarly proposed the act to him.
3d December, 1680. The depositions of my Lord's witnesses were taken, to invalidate the King's witnesses; they were very slight persons, but, being fifteen or sixteen, they took up all that day, and in truth they rather did my Lord more injury than service.
3rd December, 1680. The testimonies of my Lord's witnesses were collected to discredit the King's witnesses; they were quite unimpressive individuals, but since they were fifteen or sixteen, they occupied the entire day, and in reality, they ended up causing my Lord more harm than help.
4th December, 1680. Came other witnesses of the Commons to corroborate the King's, some being Peers, some Commons, with others of good quality, who took off all the former day's objections, and set the King's witnesses recti in curiâ.
4th December, 1680. Other witnesses from the Commons came to support the King's testimony, including some Peers, some from the Commons, and others of good standing, who disproved all the previous day's objections and validated the King's witnesses recti in curiâ.
6th December, 1680. Sir William Jones summed up the evidence; to him succeeded all the rest of the managers, and then Mr. Henry Poule made a vehement oration. After this my Lord, as on all occasions, and often during the trial, spoke in his own defense, denying the charge altogether, and that he had never seen Oates, or Turberville, at the time and manner affirmed: in truth, their testimony did little weigh with me; Dugdale's only seemed to press hardest, to which my Lord spoke a great while, but confusedly, without any method.
6th December, 1680. Sir William Jones summarized the evidence; following him were all the other managers, and then Mr. Henry Poule delivered a passionate speech. After that, my Lord, as he did on all occasions and often during the trial, spoke in his own defense, completely denying the charge and claiming that he had never seen Oates or Turberville at the time and in the way they said. Honestly, their testimony didn’t hold much weight with me; Dugdale's was the only one that seemed to pressure him the most, to which my Lord spoke at length, but it was disorganized and without any clear structure.
One thing my Lord said as to Oates, which I confess did exceedingly affect me: That a person who during his depositions should so vauntingly brag that though he went over to the Church of Rome, yet he was never a Papist, nor of their religion, all the time that he seemed to apostatize from the Protestant, but only as a spy; though he confessed he took their sacrament; worshiped images, went through all their oaths and discipline of their proselytes, swearing secrecy and to be faithful, but with intent to come over again and betray them; that such a hypocrite, that had so deeply prevaricated as even to turn idolater (for so we of the Church of England termed it), attesting God so solemnly that he was entirely theirs and devoted to their interest, and conse[Pg 155]quently (as he pretended) trusted; I say, that the witness of such a profligate wretch should be admitted against the life of a peer,—this my Lord looked upon as a monstrous thing, and such as must needs redound to the dishonor of our religion and nation. And verily I am of his Lordship's opinion: such a man's testimony should not be taken against the life of a dog. But the merit of something material which he discovered against Coleman, put him in such esteem with the Parliament, that now, I fancy, he stuck at nothing, and thought everybody was to take what he said for Gospel. The consideration of this, and some other circumstances, began to stagger me; particularly how it was possible that one who went among the Papists on such a design, and pretended to be intrusted with so many letters and commissions from the Pope and the party,—nay, and delivered them to so many great persons,—should not reserve one of them to show, nor so much as one copy of any commission, which he who had such dexterity in opening letters might certainly have done, to the undeniable conviction of those whom he accused; but, as I said, he gained credit on Coleman. But, as to others whom he so madly flew upon, I am little inclined to believe his testimony, he being so slight a person, so passionate, ill bred, and of such impudent behavior; nor is it likely that such piercing politicians as the Jesuits should trust him with so high and so dangerous secrets.
One thing my Lord said about Oates really affected me: that a person who, during his testimony, would so boastfully claim that although he joined the Church of Rome, he was never a Papist or part of their religion—while he appeared to abandon the Protestant faith, doing so only as a spy—was quite hypocritical. He admitted he took their sacrament, worshiped images, went through all their oaths and rules, swore to keep secrets, and promised loyalty, but with the intention of betraying them later. For someone to be such a hypocrite, to even turn idolater (as we in the Church of England would call it), swearing before God that he was completely theirs and devoted to their cause, and yet (as he pretended) trusted; I say that the testimony of such a morally corrupt person should not even be accepted against the life of a peer—my Lord saw this as a monstrous thing that would surely bring dishonor to our religion and nation. Honestly, I agree with his Lordship: a man like that’s testimony shouldn't be taken seriously at all. But because of something significant he revealed against Coleman, he gained such esteem with Parliament that now I think he held nothing back, believing everyone should take his word as Gospel. This, along with other factors, started to make me question things, especially how someone who went among the Papists on such a mission, claiming to handle many letters and commissions from the Pope and the group—indeed delivering them to numerous influential people—could not keep even one to show, nor a single copy of any commission, which someone skilled at opening letters certainly could have done to convincingly prove his accusations against those he targeted; but as I said, he gained credibility on Coleman. As for the others he ferociously went after, I am little inclined to trust his testimony, given that he's such a petty person, so passionate, ill-mannered, and so shamelessly audacious; it’s unlikely that shrewd politicians like the Jesuits would confide in him with their most risky and confidential secrets.
7th December, 1680. On Tuesday, I was again at the trial, when judgment was demanded; and, after my Lord had spoken what he could in denying the fact, the managers answering the objections, the Peers adjourned to their House, and within two hours returned again. There was, in the meantime, this question put to the judges, "whether there being but one witness to any single crime, or act, it could amount to convict a man of treason." They gave an unanimous opinion that in case of treason they all were overt acts for though no man should be condemned by one witness for any one act, yet for several acts to the same intent, it was valid; which was my Lord's case. This being past, and the Peers in their seats again, the Lord Chancellor Finch (this day the Lord High-Steward) removing to the woolsack next his Majesty's state, after summoning the Lieutenant of the Tower to bring forth[Pg 156] his prisoner, and proclamation made for silence, demanded of every Peer (who were in all eighty-six) whether William, Lord Viscount Stafford, were guilty of the treason laid to his charge, or not guilty.
7th December, 1680. On Tuesday, I was back at the trial, where a verdict was being requested. After my Lord spoke as much as he could to deny the accusations and the managers addressed the objections, the Peers adjourned to their House and returned in about two hours. In the meantime, the judges were asked whether having just one witness for any single crime could be enough to convict someone of treason. They all agreed that in cases of treason, all acts are relevant; even though no one should be condemned based on a single witness for one act, multiple acts with the same intent could be valid, which applied to my Lord's case. Once that was settled and the Peers were back in their seats, the Lord Chancellor Finch (who was also the Lord High-Steward today) moved to the woolsack next to the King’s throne. After summoning the Lieutenant of the Tower to bring forth[Pg 156] his prisoner, and calling for silence, he asked each of the eighty-six Peers whether William, Lord Viscount Stafford, was guilty of the treason he was accused of or not guilty.
Then the Peer spoken to, standing up, and laying his right hand upon his breast, said guilty, or not guilty, upon my honor, and then sat down, the Lord Steward noting their suffrages as they answered upon a paper: when all had done, the number of not guilty being but 31, the guilty 55; and then, after proclamation for silence again, the Lord Steward directing his speech to the prisoner, against whom the ax was turned edgeways and not before, in aggravation of his crime, he being ennobled by the King's father, and since received many favors from his present Majesty: after enlarging on his offense, deploring first his own unhappiness that he who had never condemned any man before should now be necessitated to begin with him, he then pronounced sentence of death by hanging, drawing, and quartering, according to form, with great solemnity and dreadful gravity; and, after a short pause, told the prisoner that he believed the Lords would intercede for the omission of some circumstances of his sentence, beheading only excepted; and then breaking his white staff, the Court was dissolved. My Lord Stafford during all this latter part spoke but little, and only gave their Lordships thanks after the sentence was pronounced; and indeed behaved himself modestly, and as became him.
Then the peer being addressed stood up, placed his right hand on his chest, and declared guilty or not guilty, upon my honor, then sat down as the Lord Steward recorded their votes on paper. When everyone had finished, there were only 31 not guilty votes and 55 guilty votes. After a call for silence, the Lord Steward spoke to the prisoner, with the axe turned edgeways against him, highlighting the severity of his crime, considering he was honored by the King’s father and had received many favors from the current King. After discussing the offense and lamenting his own unfortunate position of having to begin his role with this case, he pronounced the sentence of death by hanging, drawing, and quartering, adhering to protocol with great seriousness and gravity. After a brief pause, he informed the prisoner that he believed the Lords would plead for the omission of some aspects of the sentence, with beheading being the only exception. Then, breaking his white staff, the court was dissolved. My Lord Stafford spoke very little during this final part and only thanked the Lords after the sentence was announced, conducting himself modestly, as was fitting.
It was observed that all his own relations of his name and family condemned him, except his nephew, the Earl of Arundel, son to the Duke of Norfolk. And it must be acknowledged that the whole trial was carried on with exceeding gravity: so stately and august an appearance I had never seen before; for, besides the innumerable spectators of gentlemen and foreign ministers, who saw and heard all the proceedings, the prisoner had the consciences of all the Commons of England for his accusers, and all the Peers to be his judges and jury. He had likewise the assistance of what counsel he would, to direct him in his plea, who stood by him. And yet I can hardly think that a person of his age and experience should engage men whom he never saw before (and one of them that came to visit him as a stranger at Paris) POINT[Pg 157] BLANK to murder the King: God only, who searches hearts, can discover the truth. Lord Stafford was not a man beloved especially of his own family.
It was noted that all his family and connections condemned him, except his nephew, the Earl of Arundel, who was the son of the Duke of Norfolk. It's important to mention that the entire trial was conducted with extreme seriousness; I had never witnessed such a dignified and impressive scene before. Besides the countless spectators, including gentlemen and foreign ministers who observed and listened to all the proceedings, the accused was facing the conscience of all the Commons of England as his accusers, while all the Peers acted as his judges and jury. He also had the option to choose any counsel he wanted to guide him during his plea, who stood by his side. Still, I can hardly believe that a man of his age and experience would enlist the help of people he had never met before (including one who visited him as a stranger in Paris) POINT BLANK to murder the King: only God, who knows our hearts, can reveal the truth. Lord Stafford was not particularly well-liked, especially by his own family.
12th December, 1680. This evening, looking out of my chamber window toward the west, I saw a meteor of an obscure bright color, very much in shape like the blade of a sword, the rest of the sky very serene and clear. What this may portend, God only knows; but such another phenomenon I remember to have seen in 1640, about the trial of the great Earl of Strafford, preceding our bloody Rebellion. I pray God avert his judgments! We have had of late several comets, which though I believe appear from natural causes, and of themselves operate not, yet I cannot despise them. They may be warnings from God, as they commonly are forerunners of his animadversions. After many days and nights of snow, cloudy and dark weather, the comet was very much wasted.
12th December, 1680. This evening, looking out of my room window toward the west, I saw a meteor that was a strange bright color, shaped a lot like a sword blade, while the rest of the sky was calm and clear. What this could mean, only God knows; but I remember seeing something similar back in 1640, around the time of the trial of the great Earl of Strafford, just before our bloody Rebellion. I pray that God keeps his judgments away from us! Recently, we've had several comets, which I believe are due to natural causes and don’t really have an effect on their own, yet I can’t ignore them. They might be warnings from God, as they often precede his reactions. After many days and nights of snow, cloudy, and dark weather, the comet was noticeably dimmer.
17th December, 1680. My daughter-in-law was brought to bed of a son, christened Richard.
17th December, 1680. My daughter-in-law gave birth to a son, named Richard.
22d December, 1680. A solemn public Fast that God would prevent all Popish plots, avert his judgments, and give a blessing to the proceedings of Parliament now assembled, and which struck at the succession of the Duke of York.
22nd December, 1680. A serious public fast for God to stop any Catholic plots, prevent His judgments, and bless the actions of Parliament that is currently meeting, which targeted the succession of the Duke of York.
29th December, 1680. The Viscount Stafford was beheaded on Towerhill.
29th December, 1680. The Viscount Stafford was executed by beheading at Towerhill.
10th February, 1680-81. I was at the wedding of my nephew, John Evelyn of Wotton, married by the Bishop of Rochester at Westminster, in Henry VII.'s chapel, to the daughter and heir of Mr. Eversfield, of Sussex, her portion £8,000. The solemnity was kept with a few friends only at Lady Beckford's, the lady's mother.
10th February, 1680-81. I attended the wedding of my nephew, John Evelyn of Wotton, who was married by the Bishop of Rochester at Westminster, in Henry VII's chapel, to the daughter and heir of Mr. Eversfield, from Sussex, with a dowry of £8,000. The ceremony was a small affair, held with just a few friends at Lady Beckford's, the bride's mother.
8th March, 1681. Visited and dined at the Earl of Essex's, with whom I spent most of the afternoon alone. Thence to my (yet living) godmother and kinswoman, Mrs. Keightley, sister to Sir Thomas Evelyn and niece to my father, being now eighty-six years of age, sprightly, and in perfect health, her eyes serving her as well as ever, and of a comely countenance, that one would not suppose her above fifty.
8th March, 1681. I visited and had dinner at the Earl of Essex's, where I spent most of the afternoon alone with him. After that, I went to see my (still living) godmother and relative, Mrs. Keightley, who is the sister of Sir Thomas Evelyn and my father's niece. She is now eighty-six years old, lively, and in perfect health, her eyesight is just as good as ever, and she has a pleasant face that makes her look no older than fifty.
27th March, 1681. The Parliament now convened at Oxford. Great expectation of his Royal Highness's case as to the succession, against which the House was set.[Pg 158]
27th March, 1681. The Parliament is now meeting in Oxford. There's a lot of anticipation regarding the royal succession issue, which the House is addressing.[Pg 158]
An extraordinary sharp, cold spring, not yet a leaf on the trees, frost and snow lying: while the whole nation was in the greatest ferment.
An unusually sharp, cold spring, with no leaves on the trees, frost and snow still on the ground: while the entire nation was in a state of great unrest.
11th April, 1681. I took my leave of Dr. Lloyd (Bishop of St. Asaph) at his house in Leicester Fields, now going to reside in his diocese.
11th April, 1681. I said goodbye to Dr. Lloyd (Bishop of St. Asaph) at his home in Leicester Fields, as I am now going to live in his diocese.
12th April, 1681. I dined at Mr. Brisbane's, Secretary to the Admiralty, a learned and industrious person, whither came Dr. Burnet, to thank me for some papers I had contributed toward his excellent "History of the Reformation."
12th April, 1681. I had dinner at Mr. Brisbane's, Secretary to the Admiralty, who is a knowledgeable and hardworking individual. Dr. Burnet also arrived to thank me for some papers I had contributed to his outstanding "History of the Reformation."
26th April, 1681. I dined at Don Pietro Ronquillo's, the Spanish Ambassador, at Wild House, who used me with extraordinary civility. The dinner was plentiful, half after the Spanish, half after the English way. After dinner, he led me into his bedchamber, where we fell into a long discourse concerning religion. Though he was a learned man in politics, and an advocate, he was very ignorant in religion, and unable to defend any point of controversy; he was, however, far from being fierce. At parting, he earnestly wished me to apply humbly to the blessed virgin to direct me, assuring me that he had known divers who had been averse from the Roman Catholic religion, wonderfully enlightened and convinced by her intercession. He importuned me to come and visit him often.
26th April, 1681. I had dinner at Don Pietro Ronquillo's, the Spanish Ambassador, at Wild House, who treated me with remarkable kindness. The dinner was abundant, half prepared in the Spanish style and half in the English style. After dinner, he took me into his bedroom, where we had a long conversation about religion. Although he was knowledgeable in politics and a skilled advocate, he knew very little about religion and couldn't defend any controversial points; however, he wasn’t aggressive about it. When we parted, he earnestly encouraged me to humbly pray to the blessed virgin for guidance, assuring me that he had seen several people who were initially opposed to the Roman Catholic faith be wonderfully enlightened and convinced through her intercession. He urged me to come and visit him often.
29th April, 1681. But one shower of rain all this month.
29th April, 1681. Just one rain shower this entire month.
5th May, 1681. Came to dine with me Sir William Fermor, of Northamptonshire, and Sir Christopher Wren, his Majesty's architect and surveyor, now building the Cathedral of St. Paul, and the column in memory of the city's conflagration, and was in hand with the building of fifty parish churches. A wonderful genius had this incomparable person.
5th May, 1681. I had dinner with Sir William Fermor from Northamptonshire and Sir Christopher Wren, the King’s architect and surveyor, who was currently working on the Cathedral of St. Paul and the column commemorating the city’s fire, as well as overseeing the construction of fifty parish churches. This remarkable individual was truly a genius.
16th May, 1681. Came my Lady Sunderland, to desire that I would propose a match to Sir Stephen Fox for her son, Lord Spencer, to marry Mrs. Jane, Sir Stephen's daughter. I excused myself all I was able; for the truth is, I was afraid he would prove an extravagant man: for, though a youth of extraordinary parts, and had an excellent education to render him a worthy man, yet his early inclinations to extravagance made me apprehensive, that[Pg 159] I should not serve Sir Stephen by proposing it, like a friend; this being now his only daughter, well-bred, and likely to receive a large share of her father's opulence. Lord Sunderland was much sunk in his estate by gaming and other prodigalities, and was now no longer Secretary of State, having fallen into displeasure of the King for siding with the Commons about the succession; but which, I am assured, he did not do out of his own inclination, or for the preservation of the Protestant religion, but by mistaking the ability of the party to carry it. However, so earnest and importunate was the Countess, that I did mention it to Sir Stephen, who said it was too great an honor, that his daughter was very young, as well as my Lord, and he was resolved never to marry her without the parties' mutual liking; with other objections which I neither would or could contradict. He desired me to express to the Countess the great sense he had of the honor done him, that his daughter and her son were too young, that he would do nothing without her liking, which he did not think her capable of expressing judiciously, till she was sixteen or seventeen years of age, of which she now wanted four years, and that I would put it off as civilly as I could.
16th May, 1681. Lady Sunderland came to ask me to suggest a match to Sir Stephen Fox for her son, Lord Spencer, to marry Mrs. Jane, Sir Stephen's daughter. I tried to excuse myself as much as I could because I was honestly worried he would turn out to be a reckless man. Although he was a young man of remarkable talent and had a great education that could make him a respectable person, his early tendencies toward extravagance made me nervous that[Pg 159] I wouldn't be acting as a true friend to Sir Stephen by proposing it, especially since this was his only daughter, well-raised, and likely to inherit a substantial portion of her father's wealth. Lord Sunderland had lost a lot from gambling and other wasteful spending and was no longer Secretary of State, having fallen out of favor with the King for siding with the Commons on the succession issue; although, I’ve been told he didn’t do this out of personal belief or for the sake of the Protestant faith, but misunderstanding the ability of his side to succeed. However, Lady Sunderland was so eager and persistent that I eventually mentioned it to Sir Stephen, who responded that it would be too great an honor, noting that both his daughter and my Lord were very young. He was determined never to marry her off without the mutual agreement of both parties, along with other objections that I couldn't argue against. He asked me to convey to the Countess how much he appreciated the honor, that his daughter and her son were too young, that he wouldn't do anything without her agreement, which he believed she wouldn’t be able to express wisely until she was sixteen or seventeen, of which she currently lacked four years, and that I should decline as politely as I could.
20th May, 1681. Our new curate preached, a pretty hopeful young man, yet somewhat raw, newly come from college, full of Latin sentences, which in time will wear off. He read prayers very well.
20th May, 1681. Our new curate preached, a pretty hopeful young man, but a bit inexperienced, just arrived from college, full of Latin phrases that will eventually fade away. He read prayers really well.
25th May, 1681. There came to visit me Sir William Walter and Sir John Elowes: and the next day, the Earl of Kildare, a young gentleman related to my wife, and other company. There had scarce fallen any rain since Christmas.
25th May, 1681. Sir William Walter and Sir John Elowes came to visit me, and the next day, the Earl of Kildare, a young man related to my wife, along with some other guests. There had hardly been any rain since Christmas.
2d June, 1681. I went to Hampton Court, when the Surrey gentlemen presented their addresses to his Majesty, whose hand I kissed, introduced by the Duke of Albemarle. Being at the Privy Council, I took another occasion of discoursing with Sir Stephen Fox about his daughter and to revive that business, and at least brought it to this: That in case the young people liked one the other, after four years, he first desiring to see a particular of my Lord's present estate if I could transmit it to him privately, he would make her portion £14,000, though to all appearance he might likely make it £50,000 as easily,[Pg 160] his eldest son having no child and growing very corpulent.
2nd June, 1681. I went to Hampton Court, where the gentlemen from Surrey presented their addresses to the King, whose hand I kissed, with an introduction by the Duke of Albemarle. While at the Privy Council, I took another opportunity to chat with Sir Stephen Fox about his daughter and to revisit that matter. I at least got to this point: If the young people liked each other after four years, he would first want to look at a specific detail of my Lord's current estate if I could share it with him privately. He would set her portion at £14,000, although it seemed possible that he could easily make it £50,000, considering his eldest son has no children and is becoming quite overweight.[Pg 160]
12th June, 1681. It still continued so great a drought as had never been known in England, and it was said to be universal.
12th June, 1681. The drought continued, unmatched in severity in England's history, and it was said to be widespread.
14th August, 1681. No sermon this afternoon, which I think did not happen twice in this parish these thirty years; so gracious has God been to it, and indeed to the whole nation: God grant that we abuse not this great privilege either by our wantonness, schism, or unfaithfulness, under such means as he has not favored any other nation under Heaven besides!
14th August, 1681. There was no sermon this afternoon, which I believe hasn't happened twice in this parish in the last thirty years; God has been so gracious to us, and indeed to the whole nation. God help us not to misuse this great privilege by our recklessness, division, or unfaithfulness, especially considering the blessings He hasn't given to any other nation in the world!
23d August, 1681. I went to Wotton, and, on the following day, was invited to Mr. Denzil Onslow's at his seat at Purford, where was much company, and such an extraordinary feast, as I had hardly seen at any country gentleman's table. What made it more remarkable was, that there was not anything save what his estate about it did afford; as venison, rabbits, hares, pheasants, partridges, pigeons, quails, poultry, all sorts of fowl in season from his own decoy near his house, and all sorts of fresh fish. After dinner we went to see sport at the decoy, where I never saw so many herons.
23rd August, 1681. I went to Wotton, and the next day, I was invited to Mr. Denzil Onslow's place at Purford, where there was a large gathering and an incredible feast, unlike anything I had ever seen at a country gentleman's table. What made it even more impressive was that everything served was sourced from his estate, including venison, rabbits, hares, pheasants, partridges, pigeons, quails, and a variety of fresh fowl in season from his decoy close to his house, along with all kinds of fresh fish. After dinner, we headed to the decoy to watch some sport, where I saw more herons than I had ever seen before.
The seat stands on a flat, the ground pasture, rarely watered, and exceedingly improved since Mr. Onslow bought it of Sir Robert Parkhurst, who spent a fair estate. The house is timber, but commodious, and with one ample dining-room, the hall adorned with paintings of fowl and huntings, etc., the work of Mr. Barlow, who is excellent in this kind from the life.
The seat is located on flat, dry pasture land that hardly gets watered, and it has been greatly improved since Mr. Onslow purchased it from Sir Robert Parkhurst, who invested a good amount of money in it. The house is made of timber, but it’s spacious, featuring a large dining room, and the hall is decorated with paintings of birds and hunting scenes, created by Mr. Barlow, who is exceptional at capturing life in his art.
30th August, 1681. From Wotton I went to see Mr. Hussey (at Sutton in Shere), who has a very pretty seat well watered, near my brother's. He is the neatest husband for curious ordering his domestic and field accommodations, and what pertains to husbandry, that I have ever seen, as to his granaries, tacklings, tools, and utensils, plows, carts, stables, wood piles, wood houses, even to hen roosts and hog troughs. Methought, I saw old Cato, or Varro, in him; all substantial, all in exact order. The sole inconvenience he lies under, is the great quantity of sand which the stream brings along with it, and fills his canals and receptacles for fish too soon. The rest of my time of stay at Wotton was spent in walking about the[Pg 161] grounds and goodly woods, where I have in my youth so often entertained my solitude; and so, on the 2d of September, I once more returned to my home.
30th August, 1681. From Wotton, I went to visit Mr. Hussey (at Sutton in Shere), who has a beautiful place with plenty of water, near my brother's. He is the most meticulous when it comes to organizing his home and farm facilities, including everything related to agriculture, that I have ever seen—his granaries, equipment, tools, utensils, plows, carts, stables, wood stacks, woodhouses, even his chicken coops and pig troughs. I felt like I was looking at old Cato or Varro; everything was substantial and perfectly organized. The only drawback he faces is the large amount of sand that the stream brings, which quickly fills his canals and fish ponds. The rest of my time at Wotton was spent walking around the[Pg 161] grounds and beautiful woods, where I had often enjoyed my solitude in my youth; and so, on the 2nd of September, I returned home once again.
6th September, 1681. Died my pretty grandchild, and was interred on the 8th [at Deptford].
6th September, 1681. My beautiful grandchild died and was buried on the 8th [at Deptford].
14th September, 1681. Dined with Sir Stephen Fox, who proposed to me the purchasing of Chelsea College, which his Majesty had sometime since given to our Society, and would now purchase it again to build a hospital; or infirmary for soldiers there, in which he desired my assistance as one of the Council of the Royal Society.
14th September, 1681. Had dinner with Sir Stephen Fox, who suggested that I consider buying Chelsea College, which the King had previously given to our Society and now wanted to buy back to build a hospital or infirmary for soldiers there. He requested my help as a member of the Council of the Royal Society.
15th September, 1681. I had another opportunity of visiting his Majesty's private library at Whitehall.
15th September, 1681. I had another chance to visit the King’s private library at Whitehall.
To Sir Samuel Morland's, to see his house and mechanics.
To visit Sir Samuel Morland's house and see his machinery.
17th September, 1681. I went with Monsieur Faubert about taking the Countess of Bristol's house for an academy, he being lately come from Paris for his religion, and resolving to settle here.
17th September, 1681. I went with Monsieur Faubert to discuss renting the Countess of Bristol's house for an academy, as he has recently arrived from Paris due to his faith and is planning to settle here.
23d September, 1681. I went to see Sir Thomas Bond's fine house and garden at Peckham.
23rd September, 1681. I went to visit Sir Thomas Bond's beautiful house and garden in Peckham.
2d October, 1681. I went to Camberwell, where that good man Dr. Parr (late chaplain to Archbishop Usher) preached on Acts xvi. 30.
2nd October, 1681. I went to Camberwell, where that good man Dr. Parr (recently chaplain to Archbishop Usher) preached on Acts 16:30.
11th October, 1681. To Fulham, to visit the Bishop of London, in whose garden I first saw the Sedum arborescens in flower, which was exceedingly beautiful.
11th October, 1681. Went to Fulham to visit the Bishop of London, where I first saw the Sedum arborescens in bloom, and it was incredibly beautiful.
5th November, 1681. Dr. Hooper preached on Mark xii. 16, 17, before the King, of the usurpation of the Church of Rome. This is one of the first rank of pulpit men in the nation.
5th November, 1681. Dr. Hooper preached on Mark xii. 16, 17, in front of the King, about the takeover of the Church of Rome. He is one of the top preachers in the country.
15th November, 1681. I dined with the Earl of Essex who, after dinner in his study, where we were alone, related to me how much he had been scandalized and injured in the report of his being privy to the marriage of his Lady's niece, the rich young widow of the late Lord Ogle, sole daughter of the Earl of Northumberland; showing me a letter of Mr. Thynn's, excusing himself for not communicating his marriage to his Lordship. He acquainted me also with the whole story of that unfortunate lady being betrayed by her grandmother, the Countess of Northumberland, and Colonel Bret, for money;[Pg 162] and that though, upon the importunity of the Duke of Monmouth, he had delivered to the grandmother a particular of the jointure which Mr. Thynn pretended he would settle on the lady, yet he totally discouraged the proceeding as by no means a competent match for one that both by birth and fortune might have pretended to the greatest prince in Christendom; that he also proposed the Earl of Kingston, or the Lord Cranburn, but was by no means for Mr. Thynn.
15th November, 1681. I had dinner with the Earl of Essex who, after we finished eating in his study where we were alone, told me how scandalized and hurt he was by the rumors that he was involved in the marriage of his lady's niece, the wealthy young widow of the late Lord Ogle, the only daughter of the Earl of Northumberland. He showed me a letter from Mr. Thynn, apologizing for not informing his lordship about his marriage. He also shared the whole story of that unfortunate lady being betrayed by her grandmother, the Countess of Northumberland, and Colonel Bret, for money; [Pg 162] and although, due to the insistence of the Duke of Monmouth, he had provided the grandmother with details of the jointure that Mr. Thynn claimed he would arrange for the lady, he strongly advised against the marriage as it was by no means a suitable match for someone who, by both heritage and wealth, could aspire to marry the greatest prince in Christendom. He also suggested the Earl of Kingston or Lord Cranburn, but he was definitely not in favor of Mr. Thynn.
19th November, 1681. I dined with my worthy friend, Mr. Erskine, Master of the Charter House, uncle to the Duchess of Monmouth; a wise and learned gentleman, fitter to have been a privy councillor and minister of state than to have been laid aside.
19th November, 1681. I had dinner with my good friend, Mr. Erskine, Master of the Charter House, who is the uncle of the Duchess of Monmouth; a wise and knowledgeable man, more suited to be a privy councillor and state minister than to have been set aside.
24th November, 1681. I was at the audience of the Russian Ambassador before both their Majesties in the Banqueting House. The presents were carried before him, held up by his followers in two ranks before the King's State, and consisted of tapestry (one suite of which was doubtlessly brought from France as being of that fabric, the Ambassador having passed through that kingdom as he came out of Spain), a large Persian carpet, furs of sable and ermine, etc.; but nothing was so splendid and exotic as the Ambassador who came soon after the King's restoration. This present Ambassador was exceedingly offended that his coach was not permitted to come into the Court, till, being told that no King's Ambassador did, he was pacified, yet requiring an attestation of it under the hand of Sir Charles Cotterell, the Master of the Ceremonies; being, it seems, afraid he should offend his Master, if he omitted the least punctilio. It was reported he condemned his son to lose his head for shaving off his beard, and putting himself in the French mode at Paris, and that he would have executed it, had not the French King interceded—but qy. of this.
24th November, 1681. I was present at the audience of the Russian Ambassador before both of their Majesties in the Banqueting House. The gifts were carried before him, held up by his attendants in two lines in front of the King's State, and included a tapestry (one piece of which was surely brought from France since the Ambassador passed through that country on his way from Spain), a large Persian carpet, furs of sable and ermine, etc.; but nothing was as splendid and exotic as the Ambassador who arrived shortly after the King's restoration. This current Ambassador was extremely upset that his coach was not allowed to enter the Court until he was informed that no King's Ambassador had that privilege; he was then calmed, yet insisted on getting a written confirmation of it from Sir Charles Cotterell, the Master of the Ceremonies, as he seemed worried he might upset his Master if he missed even the slightest detail. It was said he condemned his son to lose his head for shaving off his beard and adopting the French style in Paris, and that he would have carried out the sentence if the French King hadn't intervened—but I'm not sure about that.
30th November, 1681. Sir Christopher Wren chosen President [of the Royal Society], Mr. Austine, Secretary, with Dr. Plot, the ingenious author of the "History of Oxfordshire." There was a most illustrious appearance.
30th November, 1681. Sir Christopher Wren was chosen as President [of the Royal Society], Mr. Austine as Secretary, along with Dr. Plot, the talented author of the "History of Oxfordshire." It was a truly remarkable event.
11th January, 1681-82. I saw the audience of the Morocco Ambassador, his retinue not numerous. He was received in the Banqueting House, both their Maj[Pg 163]esties being present. He came up to the throne without making any sort of reverence, not bowing his head, or body. He spoke by a renegado Englishman, for whose safe return there was a promise. They were all clad in the Moorish habit, cassocks of colored cloth, or silk, with buttons and loops, over this an alhaga, or white woolen mantle, so large as to wrap both head and body, a sash, or small turban, naked-legged and armed, but with leather socks like the Turks, rich scymetar, and large calico sleeved shirts. The Ambassador had a string of pearls oddly woven in his turban. I fancy the old Roman habit was little different as to the mantle and naked limbs. He was a handsome person, well featured, of a wise look, subtle, and extremely civil. Their presents were lions and ostriches; their errand about a peace at Tangier. But the concourse and tumult of the people was intolerable, so as the officers could keep no order, which these strangers were astonished at first, there being nothing so regular, exact, and performed with such silence, as is on all these public occasions of their country, and indeed over all the Turkish dominions.
11th January, 1681-82. I observed the audience with the Morocco Ambassador, whose entourage was not large. He was welcomed in the Banqueting House, with both their Majesties present. He approached the throne without offering any kind of reverence, not bowing his head or body. He spoke through an English renegade, for whom there was a guarantee of safe return. They were all dressed in Moorish attire, wearing colorful cloth or silk cassocks with buttons and loops, along with an alhaga, or large white woolen mantle that could cover both head and body, a sash, or small turban, and they were barefoot but wore leather socks like the Turks, carrying rich scimitars and large calico-sleeved shirts. The Ambassador had a string of pearls intricately woven into his turban. I imagine the old Roman style was not much different regarding the mantle and bare legs. He was an attractive man, well-featured, with a wise expression, shrewd, and extremely polite. Their gifts included lions and ostriches; their mission was about peace at Tangier. However, the noise and chaos of the crowd were unbearable, causing the officers to struggle to maintain order, which astonished these foreigners at first, as there was nothing so orderly, precise, and conducted with such silence as is customary at public events in their country, and indeed throughout the Turkish domains.
14th January, 1682. Dined at the Bishop of Rochester's, at the Abbey, it being his marriage day, after twenty-four years. He related to me how he had been treated by Sir William Temple, foreseeing that he might be a delegate in the concern of my Lady Ogle now likely come in controversy upon her marriage with Mr. Thynn; also how earnestly the late Earl of Danby, Lord Treasurer, sought his friendship, and what plain and sincere advice he gave him from time to time about his miscarriages and partialities; particularly his outing Sir John Duncomb from being Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Sir Stephen Fox, above all, from being Paymaster of the Army. The Treasurer's excuse and reason was, that Fox's credit was so over great with the bankers and monied men, that he could procure none but by his means, "for that reason," replied the Bishop, "I would have made him my friend, Sir Stephen being a person both honest and of credit." He told him likewise of his stateliness and difficulty of access, and several other miscarriages, and which indeed made him hated.
14th January, 1682. I had dinner at the Bishop of Rochester's at the Abbey, celebrating his wedding day after twenty-four years. He shared with me how he had been treated by Sir William Temple, anticipating that he might be involved as a delegate regarding Lady Ogle, who was likely to become a point of contention due to her marriage to Mr. Thynn. He also discussed how earnestly the late Earl of Danby, the Lord Treasurer, sought his friendship and the honest and straightforward advice he offered him about his mistakes and biases; particularly regarding the removal of Sir John Duncomb from the position of Chancellor of the Exchequer and Sir Stephen Fox from his role as Paymaster of the Army. The Treasurer justified his decision by saying that Fox had too much influence with the bankers and wealthy individuals, indicating that he could obtain funds only through Fox's connections. "For that reason," the Bishop said, "I would have made him my ally, as Sir Stephen is both honest and reputable." He also mentioned Fox's grand demeanor and his difficulty in being approached, along with various other failures that ultimately made him disliked.
24th January, 1682. To the Royal Society, where at the Council we passed a new law for the more accurate[Pg 164] consideration of candidates, as whether they would really be useful; also concerning the honorary members, that none should be admitted but by diploma.
24th January, 1682. To the Royal Society, where at the Council we approved a new rule for more carefully evaluating candidates, to determine their actual usefulness; also regarding honorary members, that none should be admitted without a diploma.
This evening I was at the entertainment of the Morocco Ambassador at the Duchess of Portsmouth's glorious apartments at Whitehall, where was a great banquet of sweetmeats and music; but at which both the Ambassador and his retinue behaved themselves with extraordinary moderation and modesty, though placed about a long table, a lady between two Moors, and among these were the King's natural children, namely, Lady Lichfield and Sussex, the Duchess of Portsmouth, Nelly, etc., concubines, and cattle of that sort, as splendid as jewels and excess of bravery could make them; the Moors neither admiring nor seeming to regard anything, furniture or the like, with any earnestness, and but decently tasting of the banquet. They drank a little milk and water, but not a drop of wine; they also drank of a sorbet and jacolatt;45 did not look about, or stare on the ladies, or express the least surprise, but with a courtly negligence in pace, countenance, and whole behavior, answering only to such questions as were asked with a great deal of wit and gallantry, and so gravely took leave with this compliment, that God would bless the Duchess of Portsmouth and the Prince, her son meaning the little Duke of Richmond. The King came in at the latter end, just as the Ambassador was going away. In this manner was this slave (for he was no more at home) entertained by most of the nobility in town, and went often to Hyde Park on horseback, where he and his retinue showed their extraordinary activity in horsemanship, and flinging and catching their lances at full speed; they rode very short, and could stand upright at full speed, managing their spears with incredible agility. He went sometimes to the theaters, where, upon any foolish or fantastical action, he could not forbear laughing, but he endeavored to hide it with extraordinary modesty and gravity. In a word, the Russian Ambassador, still at Court behaved himself like a clown compared to this civil heathen.
This evening, I attended a gathering hosted by the Morocco Ambassador at the Duchess of Portsmouth's stunning residence at Whitehall. There was a lavish feast with desserts and music. Both the Ambassador and his entourage displayed remarkable restraint and humility, seated at a long table with a lady between two Moors. Among the guests were the King's illegitimate children, including Lady Lichfield and Sussex, along with the Duchess of Portsmouth, Nellie, and others, all adorned as beautifully as jewels and as grandly as possible. The Moors neither admired nor seemed to pay attention to anything, including the decor, tasting the banquet with decent restraint. They drank a little milk and water, but not a single drop of wine; they also had a sorbet and jacolatt. They did not look around, stare at the ladies, or show any surprise, maintaining a composed indifference in their demeanor, responding only to questions with wit and charm. They took their leave solemnly, wishing God's blessings upon the Duchess of Portsmouth and her son, the little Duke of Richmond. The King arrived just as the Ambassador was departing. This man, who had no real home in this setting, was entertained by the city's nobility and frequently rode in Hyde Park, where he and his escort showcased impressive horsemanship, skillfully throwing and catching their lances at full speed. They rode in a short style, able to stand upright while galloping, handling their spears with remarkable agility. Occasionally, he attended the theaters, where he couldn't help but laugh at foolish or absurd antics, though he tried to conceal it with great modesty and seriousness. In short, the Russian Ambassador still at court seemed like a fool compared to this cultured stranger.
27th January, 1682. This evening, Sir Stephen Fox acquainted me again with his Majesty's resolution of pro[Pg 165]ceeding in the erection of a Royal Hospital for emerited soldiers on that spot of ground which the Royal Society had sold to his Majesty for £1,300, and that he would settle £5,000 per annum on it, and build to the value of £20,000 for the relief and reception of four companies, namely, 400 men, to be as in a college, or monastery. I was therefore desired by Sir Stephen (who had not only the whole managing of this, but was, as I perceived, himself to be a grand benefactor, as well it became him who had gotten so vast an estate by the soldiers) to assist him, and consult what method to cast it in, as to the government. So, in his study we arranged the governor, chaplain, steward, housekeeper, chirurgeon, cook, butler, gardener, porter, and other officers, with their several salaries and entertainments. I would needs have a library, and mentioned several books, since some soldiers might possibly be studious, when they were at leisure to recollect. Thus we made the first calculations, and set down our thoughts to be considered and digested better, to show his Majesty and the Archbishop. He also engaged me to consider of what laws and orders were fit for the government, which was to be in every respect as strict as in any religious convent.
27th January, 1682. This evening, Sir Stephen Fox informed me again about the King’s decision to proceed with the establishment of a Royal Hospital for retired soldiers on the piece of land that the Royal Society sold to the King for £1,300. He mentioned that he would allocate £5,000 per year for it and construct facilities worth £20,000 for the care and accommodation of four companies, totaling 400 men, designed to operate like a college or monastery. Sir Stephen, who was not only in charge of this project but was also, as I realized, a major benefactor deserving of his fortune gained through the soldiers, asked for my assistance in determining how to structure its governance. So, in his study, we organized the roles of governor, chaplain, steward, housekeeper, surgeon, cook, butler, gardener, porter, and various other officials, along with their respective salaries and duties. I insisted on including a library and suggested several books, hoping that some soldiers might take the opportunity to study during their free time. We then made initial calculations and noted our ideas for further consideration to present to the King and the Archbishop. He also tasked me with thinking about suitable laws and regulations for the governance, aiming for a discipline as strict as that found in any religious community.
After supper, came in the famous treble, Mr. Abel, newly returned from Italy; I never heard a more excellent voice; one would have sworn it had been a woman's, it was so high, and so well and skillfully managed, being accompanied by Signor Francesco on the harpsichord.
After dinner, in walked the famous tenor, Mr. Abel, just back from Italy; I had never heard a more exceptional voice; you would have thought it was a woman's, it was so high and so well and expertly handled, with Signor Francesco accompanying him on the harpsichord.
28th January, 1682. Mr. Pepys, late Secretary to the Admiralty, showed me a large folio containing the whole mechanic part and art of building royal ships and men-of-war, made by Sir Anthony Dean, being so accurate a piece from the very keel to the lead block, rigging, guns, victualing, manning, and even to every individual pin and nail, in a method so astonishing and curious, with a draught, both geometrical and in perspective, and several sections, that I do not think the world can show the like. I esteem this book as an extraordinary jewel.
28th January, 1682. Mr. Pepys, former Secretary to the Admiralty, showed me a large book that covers all the mechanical aspects and techniques of building royal ships and warships, created by Sir Anthony Dean. It's such a precise work, detailing everything from the very keel to the lead block, rigging, cannons, supplies, crew, and even every individual pin and nail, presented in an incredibly impressive and interesting way, with both geometric and perspective drawings, along with various sections. I don't believe anything like this exists anywhere else in the world. I consider this book to be an extraordinary treasure.
7th February, 1682. My daughter, Mary, began to learn music of Signor Bartholomeo, and dancing of Monsieur Isaac, reputed the best masters.
7th February, 1682. My daughter, Mary, started learning music from Signor Bartholomeo and dancing from Monsieur Isaac, who are considered the best teachers.
Having had several violent fits of an ague, recourse was had to bathing my legs in milk up to the knees, made[Pg 166] as hot as I could endure it: and sitting so in it in a deep churn, or vessel, covered with blankets, and drinking carduus posset, then going to bed and sweating, I not only missed that expected fit, but had no more, only continued weak, that I could not go to church till Ash Wednesday, which I had not missed, I think, so long in twenty years, so gracious had God been to me.
Having experienced several violent episodes of fever, I resorted to soaking my legs in milk up to the knees, heated as much as I could stand: and sitting in a deep churn or basin, covered with blankets, while drinking carduus posset, then going to bed and sweating, I not only avoided that expected episode but had none afterward, only remaining weak, so I couldn’t go to church until Ash Wednesday, which I hadn’t missed, I think, for twenty years, so gracious had God been to me.
After this warning and admonition, I now began to look over and methodize all my writings, accounts, letters, papers; inventoried the goods, and other articles of the house, and put things into the best order I could, and made my will; that now, growing in years, I might have none of these secular things and concerns to distract me, when it should please Almighty God to call me from this transitory life. With this, I prepared some special meditations and devotions for the time of sickness. The Lord Jesus grant them to be salutary for my poor soul in that day, that I may obtain mercy and acceptance!
After this warning and advice, I started to review and organize all my writings, accounts, letters, and papers; took stock of the belongings and other items in the house, arranged everything as neatly as I could, and wrote my will. I wanted to ensure that as I grew older, I wouldn't be distracted by these worldly matters when it was time for Almighty God to call me away from this temporary life. Alongside this, I prepared some special meditations and prayers for when I might be sick. May the Lord Jesus make them beneficial for my poor soul on that day, so that I may receive mercy and acceptance!
1st March, 1682. My second grandchild was born, and christened the next day by our vicar at Sayes Court, by the name of John.46 I beseech God to bless him!
1st March, 1682. My second grandchild was born, and was baptized the next day by our vicar at Sayes Court, and named John.46 I ask God to bless him!
2d March, 1682. Ash Wednesday. I went to church: our vicar preached on Proverbs, showing what care and vigilance was required for the keeping of the heart upright. The Holy Communion followed, on which I gave God thanks for his gracious dealing with me in my late sickness, and affording me this blessed opportunity of praising him in the congregation, and receiving the cup of salvation with new and serious resolutions.
2nd March, 1682. Ash Wednesday. I went to church: our vicar preached on Proverbs, highlighting the attention and vigilance needed to keep the heart in the right place. The Holy Communion followed, during which I thanked God for his kindness to me during my recent illness, and for giving me this wonderful chance to praise him in the community and receive the cup of salvation with fresh and serious commitments.
Came to see and congratulate my recovery, Sir John Lowther, Mr. Herbert, Mr. Pepys, Sir Anthony Deane, and Mr. Hill.
Came to see and congratulate me on my recovery: Sir John Lowther, Mr. Herbert, Mr. Pepys, Sir Anthony Deane, and Mr. Hill.
10th March, 1682. This day was executed Colonel Vrats, and some of his accomplices, for the execrable murder of Mr. Thynn, set on by the principal Koningsmark. He went to execution like an undaunted hero, as one that had done a friendly office for that base coward, Count Koningsmark, who had hopes to marry his widow, the rich Lady Ogle, and was acquitted by a corrupt jury, and so got away. Vrats told a friend of mine who[Pg 167] accompanied him to the gallows, and gave him some advice that he did not value dying of a rush, and hoped and believed God would deal with him like a gentleman. Never man went, so unconcerned for his sad fate.
10th March, 1682. Today, Colonel Vrats and some of his accomplices were executed for the horrible murder of Mr. Thynn, orchestrated by the main instigator, Koningsmark. He faced execution like a fearless hero, believing he had done a favor for the cowardly Count Koningsmark, who hoped to marry his wealthy widow, the Lady Ogle, and had been let off by a corrupt jury. Vrats told a friend of mine who accompanied him to the gallows that he didn’t fear death at all and hoped that God would treat him with respect. No man went to his end so unconcerned about his grim fate.
24th March, 1682. I went to see the corpse of that obstinate creature, Colonel Vrats, the King permitting that his body should be transported to his own country, he being of a good family, and one of the first embalmed by a particular art, invented by one William Russell, a coffin-maker, which preserved the body without disboweling, or to appearance using any bituminous matter. The flesh was florid, soft, and full, as if the person were only sleeping. He had now been dead near fifteen days, and lay exposed in a very rich coffin lined with lead, too magnificent for so daring and horrid a murderer.
24th March, 1682. I went to see the body of that stubborn man, Colonel Vrats, with the King's permission for his body to be taken back to his home country, as he came from a good family. He was one of the first to be embalmed using a special technique created by a coffin-maker named William Russell, which kept the body intact without removing the organs or seemingly using any tar-like substance. The flesh looked vibrant, soft, and plump, as if he were just sleeping. He had been dead for nearly fifteen days and lay in a very elaborate coffin lined with lead, far too extravagant for such a bold and horrific murderer.
At the meeting of the Royal Society were exhibited some pieces of amber sent by the Duke of Brandenburg, in one of which was a spider, in another a gnat, both very entire. There was a discourse of the tingeing of glass, especially with red, and the difficulty of finding any red color effectual to penetrate glass, among the glass-painters; that the most diaporous, as blue, yellow, etc., did not enter into the substance of what was ordinarily painted, more than very shallow, unless incorporated in the metal itself, other reds and whites not at all beyond the superfices.
At the meeting of the Royal Society, some pieces of amber were displayed, sent by the Duke of Brandenburg. One piece contained a spider, and another had a gnat, both perfectly preserved. There was a discussion about tinting glass, especially with red, and the challenges glass painters faced in finding a red color that effectively penetrates glass. It was noted that the more translucent colors, like blue and yellow, didn't really sink into the surface of the usual painted materials, only penetrating very little unless mixed in with the glass itself, while other reds and whites barely went beyond the surface at all.
5th April, 1682. To the Royal Society, where at a Council was regulated what collections should be published monthly, as formerly the transactions, which had of late been discontinued, but were now much called for by the curious abroad and at home.
5th April, 1682. To the Royal Society, where a Council decided which collections should be published monthly, like the transactions that had recently stopped but were now in high demand from the curious both overseas and at home.
12th April, 1682. I went this afternoon with several of the Royal Society to a supper which was all dressed, both fish and flesh, in Monsieur Papin's digestors, by which the hardest bones of beef itself, and mutton, were made as soft as cheese, without water or other liquor, and with less than eight ounces of coals, producing an incredible quantity of gravy; and for close of all, a jelly made of the bones of beef, the best for clearness and good relish, and the most delicious that I had ever seen, or tasted. We ate pike and other fish, bones and all, without impediment; but nothing exceeded the pigeons,[Pg 168] which tasted just as if baked in a pie, all these being stewed in their own juice, without any addition of water save what swam about the digestor, as in balneo; the natural juice of all these provisions acting on the grosser substances, reduced the hardest bones to tenderness; but it is best descanted with more particulars for extracting tinctures, preserving and stewing fruit, and saving fuel, in Dr. Papin's book, published and dedicated to our Society of which he is a member. He is since gone to Venice with the late Resident here (and also a member of our Society), who carried this excellent mechanic, philosopher, and physician, to set up a philosophical meeting in that city. This philosophical supper caused much mirth among us, and exceedingly pleased all the company. I sent a glass of the jelly to my wife, to the reproach of all that the ladies ever made of their best hartshorn.47
12th April, 1682. This afternoon, I went to dinner with several members of the Royal Society, where we had a meal prepared entirely using Monsieur Papin's digesters. They cooked both fish and meat to such tenderness that even the toughest beef and mutton were as soft as cheese, using no water or any other liquid, and just under eight ounces of coal, resulting in an incredible amount of gravy. To top it off, we had a jelly made from beef bones, which was the clearest and most flavorful jelly I had ever seen or tasted. We ate pike and other fish, bones included, without any trouble; but nothing compared to the pigeons, which tasted just like they had been baked in a pie. All of these dishes were stewed in their own juices, with no added water other than what was naturally present in the digester, similar to a water bath; the natural juices worked on the tougher parts and made even the hardest bones tender. However, for more details on extracting tinctures, preserving and stewing fruit, and saving fuel, it's best to refer to Dr. Papin's book, which he published and dedicated to our Society, of which he is a member. He has since traveled to Venice with the former Resident here (who is also a member of our Society), who brought this remarkable mechanic, philosopher, and physician to establish a philosophical gathering in that city. This philosophical dinner created a lot of laughter among us and pleased everyone present. I sent a glass of the jelly to my wife, putting to shame anything the ladies have ever made with their best hartshorn.[Pg 168]
The season was unusually wet, with rain and thunder.
The season was unusually rainy, with storms and thunder.
25th May, 1682. I was desired by Sir Stephen Fox and Sir Christopher Wren to accompany them to Lambeth, with the plot and design of the college to be built at Chelsea, to have the Archbishop's approbation. It was a quadrangle of 200 feet square, after the dimensions of the larger quadrangle at Christ church, Oxford, for the accommodation of 440 persons, with governor and officers. This was agreed on.
25th May, 1682. Sir Stephen Fox and Sir Christopher Wren asked me to join them in going to Lambeth to get the Archbishop's approval for the plan and design of the college to be built at Chelsea. It was a quadrangle measuring 200 feet square, based on the larger quadrangle at Christ Church, Oxford, designed to accommodate 440 people, along with a governor and officers. This was agreed upon.
The Duke and Duchess of York were just now come to London, after his escape and shipwreck, as he went by sea for Scotland.
The Duke and Duchess of York had just arrived in London after his escape and shipwreck while traveling by sea to Scotland.
28th May, 1682. At the Rolls' chapel preached the famous Dr. Burnet on 2 Peter, i. 10, describing excellently well what was meant by election; viz, not the effect of any irreversible decree, but so called because they embraced the Gospel readily, by which they became elect, or precious to God. It would be very needless to make our calling and election sure, were they irreversible and what the rigid Presbyterians pretend. In the afternoon, to St. Lawrence's church, a new and cheerful pile.[Pg 169]
28th May, 1682. At the Rolls' chapel, the famous Dr. Burnet preached on 2 Peter 1:10, explaining very well what was meant by election; namely, that it is not the result of an unchangeable decree, but is called election because those who accepted the Gospel readily became chosen or valued by God. It would be pointless to make our calling and election secure if they were unchangeable, as the strict Presbyterians claim. In the afternoon, I went to St. Lawrence's church, a new and uplifting building.[Pg 169]
29th May, 1682. I gave notice to the Bishop of Rochester of what Maimburg had published about the motives of the late Duchess of York's perversion, in his "History of Calvinism;" and did myself write to the Bishop of Winchester about it, who being concerned in it, I urged him to set forth his vindication.
29th May, 1682. I informed the Bishop of Rochester about what Maimburg published regarding the reasons behind the late Duchess of York's change in beliefs, in his "History of Calvinism"; and I also wrote to the Bishop of Winchester about it, since he was involved, urging him to present his defense.
31st May, 1682. The Morocco Ambassador being admitted an honorary member of the Royal Society, and subscribing his name and titles in Arabic, I was deputed by the Council to go and compliment him.
31st May, 1682. The Morocco Ambassador was welcomed as an honorary member of the Royal Society and signed his name and titles in Arabic. I was appointed by the Council to go and congratulate him.
19th June, 1682. The Bantam, or East India Ambassadors (at this time we had in London the Russian, Moroccan, and Indian Ambassadors), being invited to dine at Lord George Berkeley's (now Earl), I went to the entertainment to contemplate the exotic guests. They were both very hard-favored, and much resembling in countenance some sort of monkeys. We ate at two tables, the Ambassadors and interpreter by themselves. Their garments were rich Indian silks, flowered with gold, viz, a close waistcoat to their knees, drawers, naked legs, and on their heads caps made like fruit baskets. They wore poisoned daggers at their bosoms, the hafts carved with some ugly serpents' or devils' heads, exceedingly keen, and of Damascus metal. They wore no sword. The second Ambassador (sent it seems to succeed in case the first should die by the way in so tedious a journey), having been at Mecca, wore a Turkish or Arab sash, a little part of the linen hanging down behind his neck, with some other difference of habit, and was half a negro, bare legged and naked feet, and deemed a very holy man. They sat cross-legged like Turks, and sometimes in the posture of apes and monkeys; their nails and teeth as black as jet, and shining, which being the effect, as to their teeth, of perpetually chewing betel to preserve them from the toothache, much raging in their country, is esteemed beautiful.
19th June, 1682. The Bantam, or East India Ambassadors (at this time we had in London the Russian, Moroccan, and Indian Ambassadors), were invited to dinner at Lord George Berkeley's (now Earl), and I attended the gathering to observe the exotic guests. They were both quite unattractive and bore a resemblance to some type of monkeys. We sat at two separate tables, with the Ambassadors and interpreter on one side. Their clothing was luxurious Indian silks, adorned with gold, including a tight waistcoat that reached their knees, trousers, bare legs, and caps on their heads shaped like fruit baskets. They carried poisoned daggers tucked into their attire, the handles decorated with grotesque serpent or devil heads, extremely sharp, and made of Damascus steel. They did not wear swords. The second Ambassador (who was apparently sent in case the first should die during their long journey), having been to Mecca, wore a Turkish or Arab sash, with a bit of cloth hanging down behind his neck, along with some other differences in costume. He was partially of African descent, bare-legged and barefoot, and was regarded as a very holy man. They sat cross-legged like Turks and sometimes adopted postures resembling those of apes and monkeys; their nails and teeth were as black as jet and shiny, the result of constantly chewing betel to prevent toothaches, which are prevalent in their country, and is considered beautiful.
The first ambassador was of an olive hue, a flat face, narrow eyes, squat nose, and Moorish lips, no hair appeared; they wore several rings of silver, gold and copper on their fingers, which was a token of knighthood, or nobility. They were of Java Major, whose princes have been turned Mahometans not above fifty years since; the inhabitants are still pagans and idolaters. They seemed[Pg 170] of a dull and heavy constitution, not wondering at any thing they saw; but exceedingly astonished how our law gave us propriety in our estates, and so thinking we were all kings, for they could not be made to comprehend how subjects could possess anything but at the pleasure of their Prince, they being all slaves; they were pleased with the notion, and admired our happiness. They were very sober, and I believe subtle in their way. Their meat was cooked, carried up, and they attended by several fat slaves, who had no covering save drawers, which appeared very uncouth and loathsome. They ate their pilaw, and other spoon-meat, without spoons, taking up their pottage in the hollow of their fingers, and very dexterously flung it into their mouths without spilling a drop.
The first ambassador had an olive complexion, a flat face, narrow eyes, a short nose, and thick lips, and no hair was visible; they wore several rings made of silver, gold, and copper on their fingers, signifying knighthood or nobility. They were from Java Major, where the princes converted to Islam only about fifty years ago; the locals are still pagans and idol worshippers. They seemed[Pg 170] dull and heavyset, not amazed by anything they saw; however, they were very surprised by how our laws gave us ownership of our property, thinking we were all kings since they couldn’t understand how subjects could possess anything without the consent of their Prince, as they were all slaves; they liked the idea and admired our happiness. They were very serious, and I believe clever in their own way. Their food was cooked and served to them by several overweight slaves who wore only loose-fitting shorts, which looked very strange and off-putting. They ate their pilaf and other dishes without spoons, skillfully using their fingers to scoop the food and tossing it into their mouths without spilling a drop.
17th July, 1682. Came to dine with me, the Duke of Grafton and the young Earl of Ossory, son to my most dear deceased friend.
17th July, 1682. The Duke of Grafton and the young Earl of Ossory, son of my very dear late friend, came to have dinner with me.
30th July, 1682. Went to visit our good neighbor, Mr. Bohun, whose whole house is a cabinet of all elegancies, especially Indian; in the hall are contrivances of Japan screens, instead of wainscot; and there is an excellent pendule clock inclosed in the curious flowerwork of Mr. Gibbons, in the middle of the vestibule. The landscapes of the screens represent the manner of living, and country of the Chinese. But, above all, his lady's cabinet is adorned on the fret, ceiling, and chimney-piece, with Mr. Gibbons's best carving. There are also some of Streeter's best paintings, and many rich curiosities of gold and silver as growing in the mines. The gardens are exactly kept, and the whole place very agreeable and well watered. The owners are good neighbors, and Mr. Bohun has also built and endowed a hospital for eight poor people, with a pretty chapel, and every necessary accommodation.
30th July, 1682. I visited our good neighbor, Mr. Bohun, whose entire house is filled with all sorts of elegant items, especially from India; in the hall, there are Japanese screens instead of wainscoting, and there’s an excellent pendulum clock encased in the intricate floral design by Mr. Gibbons, located in the middle of the vestibule. The landscapes on the screens depict the lifestyle and countryside of China. But most notably, his wife’s cabinet is beautifully decorated on the fret, ceiling, and chimney with Mr. Gibbons’s finest carvings. There are also some of Streeter’s best paintings and many valuable curiosities made of gold and silver as found in the mines. The gardens are meticulously maintained, and the entire place is very pleasant and well-watered. The owners are friendly neighbors, and Mr. Bohun has also built and funded a hospital for eight needy people, complete with a lovely chapel and all necessary accommodations.
1st August, 1682. To the Bishop of London at Fulham, to review the additions which Mr. Marshall had made to his curious book of flowers in miniature, and collection of insects.
1st August, 1682. To the Bishop of London at Fulham, to review the additions that Mr. Marshall made to his fascinating book of miniature flowers and collection of insects.
4th August, 1682. With Sir Stephen Fox, to survey the foundations of the Royal Hospital begun at Chelsea.
4th August, 1682. With Sir Stephen Fox, to check the foundations of the Royal Hospital that has started at Chelsea.
9th August, 1682. The Council of the Royal Society had it recommended to them to be trustees and visitors,[Pg 171] or supervisors, of the Academy which Monsieur Faubert did hope to procure to be built by subscription of worthy gentlemen and noblemen, for the education of youth, and to lessen the vast expense the nation is at yearly by sending children into France to be taught military exercises. We thought to give him all the encouragement our recommendation could procure.
9th August, 1682. The Council of the Royal Society was advised to act as trustees and visitors,[Pg 171] or supervisors, for the Academy that Monsieur Faubert hoped to establish through contributions from respectable gentlemen and noblemen, aimed at educating youth and reducing the significant costs the nation incurs each year by sending children to France for military training. We aimed to provide him with as much support as our recommendation could offer.
15th August, 1682. Came to visit me Dr. Rogers, an acquaintance of mine long since at Padua. He was then Consul of the English nation, and student in that University, where he proceeded Doctor in Physic; presenting me now with the Latin oration he lately made upon the famous Dr. Harvey's anniversary in the College of Physicians, at London.
15th August, 1682. Dr. Rogers, a long-time acquaintance from Padua, came to visit me. He was the Consul for the English nation and a student at that university, where he earned his Doctorate in Medicine. He presented me with the Latin speech he recently gave at the anniversary of the famous Dr. Harvey at the College of Physicians in London.
20th August, 1682. This night I saw another comet, near Cancer, very bright, but the stream not so long as the former.
20th August, 1682. Tonight, I saw another comet, near Cancer, very bright, but the tail wasn't as long as the previous one.
29th August, 1682. Supped at Lord Clarendon's, with Lord Hyde, his brother, now the great favorite, who invited himself to dine at my house the Tuesday following.
29th August, 1682. Had dinner at Lord Clarendon's with Lord Hyde, his brother, who is now the favored one and invited himself to dinner at my place the following Tuesday.
30th October, 1682. Being my birthday, and I now entering my great climacterical of 63, after serious recollections of the years past, giving Almighty God thanks for all his merciful preservations and forbearance, begging pardon for my sins and unworthiness, and his blessing on me the year entering, I went with my Lady Fox to survey her building, and give some directions for the garden at Chiswick; the architect is Mr. May,—somewhat heavy and thick, and not so well understood: the garden much too narrow, the place without water, near a highway, and near another great house of my Lord Burlington, little land about it, so that I wonder at the expense; but women will have their will.
30th October, 1682. It’s my birthday, and I’m now reaching my significant milestone of 63. After seriously reflecting on the years that have passed, I’m giving thanks to Almighty God for all His merciful protection and patience, asking for forgiveness for my sins and unworthiness, and seeking His blessing for the year ahead. I went with Lady Fox to check on her building and give some direction for the garden at Chiswick. The architect is Mr. May—somewhat slow and heavy-handed, and not very easily grasped. The garden is way too narrow, the location lacks water, it’s close to a busy road, and near another big house owned by Lord Burlington. There’s very little land around it, so I’m surprised at the expense; but women will always get their way.
25th November, 1682. I was invited to dine with Monsieur Lionberg, the Swedish Resident, who made a magnificent entertainment, it being the birthday of his King. There dined the Duke of Albemarle, Duke of Hamilton, Earl of Bath, Earl of Aylesbury, Lord Arran, Lord Castlehaven, the son of him who was executed fifty years before, and several great persons. I was exceedingly afraid of drinking (it being a Dutch feast), but the Duke of Albemarle being that night to wait on his Majesty,[Pg 172] excess was prohibited; and, to prevent all, I stole away and left the company as soon as we rose from table.
25th November, 1682. I was invited to dinner with Monsieur Lionberg, the Swedish Resident, who hosted a lavish party in honor of his King’s birthday. The guests included the Duke of Albemarle, the Duke of Hamilton, the Earl of Bath, the Earl of Aylesbury, Lord Arran, Lord Castlehaven, the son of the man who was executed fifty years earlier, and several other notable figures. I was really worried about drinking (since it was a Dutch feast), but since the Duke of Albemarle was supposed to wait on His Majesty that night,[Pg 172] excess was prohibited; to avoid any issues, I quietly slipped away and left as soon as we finished eating.
28th November, 1682. I went to the Council of the Royal Society, for the auditing the last year's account, where I was surprised with a fainting fit that for a time took away my sight; but God being merciful to me, I recovered it after a short repose.
28th November, 1682. I attended the Royal Society meeting to review last year's accounts, where I was unexpectedly hit by a fainting spell that temporarily blurred my vision; but thankfully, I regained it after a brief rest.
30th November, 1682. I was exceedingly endangered and importuned to stand the election,48 having so many voices, but by favor of my friends, and regard of my remote dwelling, and now frequent infirmities, I desired their suffrages might be transferred to Sir John Hoskins, one of the Masters of Chancery; a most learned virtuoso as well as lawyer, who accordingly was elected.
30th November, 1682. I was in a lot of danger and pressured to run for election,48 having received so many votes, but thanks to my friends, my distant home, and my frequent health issues, I asked them to support Sir John Hoskins instead, one of the Masters of Chancery; he’s a highly knowledgeable scholar as well as a lawyer, and he was elected.
7th December, 1682. Went to congratulate Lord Hyde (the great favorite) newly made Earl of Rochester, and lately marrying his eldest daughter to the Earl of Ossory.
7th December, 1682. Went to congratulate Lord Hyde (the great favorite) who was just appointed Earl of Rochester and recently married his oldest daughter to the Earl of Ossory.
18th December, 1682. I sold my East India adventure of £250 principal for £750 to the Royal Society, after I had been in that company twenty-five years, being extraordinarily advantageous, by the blessing of God.
18th December, 1682. I sold my East India investment of £250 principal for £750 to the Royal Society, after being with that organization for twenty-five years, which was incredibly beneficial, by the grace of God.
23d January, 1682-83. Sir Francis North, son to the Lord North, and Lord Chief Justice, being made Lord Keeper on the death of the Earl of Nottingham, the Lord Chancellor, I went to congratulate him. He is a most knowing, learned, and ingenious man, and, besides being an excellent person, of an ingenious and sweet disposition, very skillful in music, painting, the new philosophy, and politer studies.
23rd January, 1682-83. Sir Francis North, son of Lord North and the Lord Chief Justice, was appointed Lord Keeper following the death of the Earl of Nottingham, the Lord Chancellor, so I went to congratulate him. He is a knowledgeable, educated, and clever man. Besides being a wonderful person with a creative and kind nature, he is also very skilled in music, painting, the new philosophy, and finer arts.
29th January, 1683. Supped at Sir Joseph Williamson's, where was a select company of our Society, Sir William Petty, Dr. Gale (that learned schoolmaster of St. Paul's), Dr. Whistler, Mr. Hill, etc. The conversation was philosophical and cheerful, on divers considerable questions proposed; as of the hereditary succession of the Roman Emperors; the Pica mentioned in the preface to our Common Prayer, which signifies only the Greek Kalendarium. These were mixed with lighter subjects.
29th January, 1683. Had dinner at Sir Joseph Williamson's, where there was a select group from our Society, including Sir William Petty, Dr. Gale (that knowledgeable schoolmaster from St. Paul's), Dr. Whistler, Mr. Hill, and others. The conversation was lively and philosophical, covering various important topics, such as the hereditary succession of the Roman Emperors and the Pica mentioned in the preface to our Common Prayer, which refers only to the Greek Kalendarium. These discussions were mixed with lighter subjects.
2d February, 1683. I made my court at St. James's, when I saw the sea charts of Captain Collins, which that[Pg 173] industrious man now brought to show the Duke, having taken all the coasting from the mouth of the Thames, as far as Wales, and exactly measuring every creek, island, rock, soundings, harbors, sands, and tides, intending next spring to proceed till he had finished the whole island, and that measured by chains and other instruments: a most exact and useful undertaking. He affirmed, that of all the maps put out since, there are none extant so true as those of Joseph Norden, who gave us the first in Queen Elizabeth's time; all since him are erroneous.
2nd February, 1683. I attended court at St. James's, where I saw the sea charts presented by Captain Collins. This hardworking man was showing them to the Duke after mapping out the coastline from the mouth of the Thames all the way to Wales, meticulously measuring every creek, island, rock, depth, harbor, sandbank, and tide. He plans to continue next spring until he has completed the whole island, all measured using chains and other instruments—a very precise and valuable project. He claimed that of all the maps produced since then, none are as accurate as those from Joseph Norden, who first made them during Queen Elizabeth's reign; all maps since then are flawed.
12th February, 1683. This morning I received the news of the death of my father-in-law, Sir Richard Browne, Knt. and Bart., who died at my house at Sayes Court this day at ten in the morning, after he had labored under the gout and dropsy for nearly six months, in the 78th year of his age. The funeral was solemnized on the 19th at Deptford, with as much decency as the dignity of the person, and our relation to him, required; there being invited the Bishop of Rochester, several noblemen, knights, and all the fraternity of the Trinity Company, of which he had been Master, and others of the country. The vicar preached a short but proper discourse on Psalm xxxix. 10, on the frailty of our mortal condition, concluding with an ample and well-deserved eulogy on the defunct, relating to his honorable birth and ancestors, education, learning in Greek and Latin, modern languages, travels, public employments, signal loyalty, character abroad, and particularly the honor of supporting the Church of England in its public worship during its persecution by the late rebels' usurpation and regicide, by the suffrages of divers Bishops, Doctors of the Church, and others, who found such an asylum in his house and family at Paris, that in their disputes with the Papists (then triumphing over it as utterly lost) they used to argue for its visibility and existence from Sir R. Browne's chapel and assembly there. Then he spoke of his great and loyal sufferings during thirteen years' exile with his present Majesty, his return with him in the signal year 1660; his honorable employment at home, his timely recess to recollect himself, his great age, infirmities, and death.
12th February, 1683. This morning I received the news of the death of my father-in-law, Sir Richard Browne, Knt. and Bart., who died at my house at Sayes Court today at ten in the morning, after suffering from gout and dropsy for nearly six months, in his 78th year. The funeral was held on the 19th at Deptford, with as much dignity as the status of the person and our relationship to him required; invited guests included the Bishop of Rochester, several noblemen, knights, and all the members of the Trinity Company, of which he was Master, along with others from the area. The vicar delivered a brief yet fitting sermon on Psalm xxxix. 10, discussing the fragility of our mortal state, concluding with a thorough and well-earned tribute to the deceased, mentioning his honorable lineage and ancestors, education, proficiency in Greek and Latin, modern languages, travels, public roles, notable loyalty, reputation abroad, and particularly the honor of supporting the Church of England in its public worship during the persecution by the recent rebels' usurpation and regicide, as recognized by various Bishops, Doctors of the Church, and others, who sought refuge in his house and family in Paris, arguing for the church's visibility and existence based on Sir R. Browne's chapel and gatherings there during their disputes with the Papists. He also spoke of his significant and loyal sufferings during thirteen years of exile with the current King, his return with him in the notable year 1660; his honorable role at home, his timely retreat to gather himself, his advanced age, illnesses, and death.
He gave to the Trinity Corporation that land in Deptford on which are built those almshouses for twenty-four[Pg 174] widows of emerited seamen. He was born the famous year of the Gunpowder Treason, in 1605, and being the last [male] of his family, left my wife, his only daughter, heir. His grandfather, Sir Richard Browne, was the great instrument under the great Earl of Leicester (favorite to Queen Elizabeth) in his government of the Netherland. He was Master of the Household to King James, and Cofferer; I think was the first who regulated the compositions through England for the King's household, provisions, progresses,49 etc., which was so high a service, and so grateful to the whole nation, that he had acknowledgments and public thanks sent him from all the counties; he died by the rupture of a vein in a vehement speech he made about the compositions in a Parliament of King James. By his mother's side he was a Gunson, Treasurer of the Navy in the reigns of Henry VIII., Queen Mary, and Queen Elizabeth, and, as by his large pedigree appears, related to divers of the English nobility. Thus ended this honorable person, after so many changes and tossings to and fro, in the same house where he was born. "Lord teach us so to number our days, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom!"
He gave the Trinity Corporation the land in Deptford where those almshouses for twenty-four widows of retired seamen are built.[Pg 174] He was born in the famous year of the Gunpowder Plot, in 1605, and since he was the last male of his family, my wife—his only daughter—was his heir. His grandfather, Sir Richard Browne, was a key figure under the great Earl of Leicester (who was a favorite of Queen Elizabeth) in managing the Netherlands. He served as Master of the Household to King James and was the Cofferer; I believe he was the first to regulate the arrangements across England for the King’s household, including provisions and travels,49 etc. This was such a significant service and so appreciated by the entire nation that he received acknowledgments and public thanks from all the counties. He died from the rupture of a vein after giving a passionate speech about the arrangements in a Parliament session of King James. On his mother’s side, he was a Gunson, Treasurer of the Navy during the reigns of Henry VIII, Queen Mary, and Queen Elizabeth, and, as shown by his extensive pedigree, he was related to several members of the English nobility. Thus ended this honorable man, after so many changes and upheavals, in the same house where he was born. "Lord, teach us to number our days, that we may apply our hearts to wisdom!"
By a special clause in his will, he ordered that his body should be buried in the churchyard under the southeast window of the chancel, adjoining to the burying places of his ancestors, since they came out of Essex into Sayes Court, he being much offended at the novel custom of burying everyone within the body of the church and chancel; that being a favor heretofore granted to martyrs and great persons; this excess of making churches charnel houses being of ill and irreverend example, and prejudicial to the health of the living, besides the continual disturbance of the pavement and seats, and several other indecencies. Dr. Hall, the pious Bishop of Norwich, would also be so interred, as may be read in his testament.
By a special clause in his will, he specified that his body should be buried in the churchyard under the southeast window of the chancel, next to the burial sites of his ancestors, since they came from Essex to Sayes Court. He was quite upset about the new trend of burying everyone inside the church and chancel, which used to be reserved for martyrs and significant individuals. This excess of turning churches into burial sites was seen as a bad and disrespectful example, harmful to the living’s health, not to mention the constant disruption of the floor and pews, along with various other unpleasant issues. Dr. Hall, the devout Bishop of Norwich, also wished to be buried in the same way, as noted in his will.
16th March, 1683. I went to see Sir Josiah Child's prodigious cost in planting walnut trees about his seat, and making fish ponds, many miles in circuit, in Epping[Pg 175] Forest, in a barren spot, as oftentimes these suddenly monied men for the most part seat themselves. He from a merchant's apprentice, and management of the East India Company's stock, being arrived to an estate (it is said) of £200,000; and lately married his daughter to the eldest son of the Duke of Beaufort, late Marquis of Worcester, with £50,000 portional present, and various expectations.
16th March, 1683. I went to check out Sir Josiah Child's amazing investment in planting walnut trees around his estate and creating fish ponds that stretch for many miles in Epping[Pg 175] Forest, in a rather desolate area, as many newly wealthy individuals often choose to do. He started out as a merchant's apprentice and managed the East India Company's stock, which has reportedly brought him a fortune of £200,000; he recently married his daughter off to the eldest son of the Duke of Beaufort, the former Marquis of Worcester, with a dowry of £50,000 and various other prospects.
I dined at Mr. Houblon's, a rich and gentle French merchant, who was building a house in the Forest, near Sir J. Child's, in a place where the late Earl of Norwich dwelt some time, and which came from his lady, the widow of Mr. Baker. It will be a pretty villa, about five miles from Whitechapel.
I had dinner at Mr. Houblon's, a wealthy and kind French merchant, who was building a house in the Forest, close to Sir J. Child's place, where the late Earl of Norwich lived for a while, which he got from his wife, the widow of Mr. Baker. It’s going to be a nice villa, about five miles from Whitechapel.
18th March, 1683. I went to hear Dr. Horneck preach at the Savoy Church, on Phil. ii. 5. He was a German born, a most pathetic preacher, a person of a saint-like life, and hath written an excellent treatise on Consideration.
18th March, 1683. I went to hear Dr. Horneck preach at the Savoy Church, on Phil. ii. 5. He was born in Germany, a truly moving preacher, a person with a saintly life, and he has written an excellent book on Consideration.
20th March, 1683. Dined at Dr. Whistler's, at the Physicians' College, with Sir Thomas Millington, both learned men; Dr. W. the most facetious man in nature, and now Censor of the college. I was here consulted where they should build their library; it is a pity this college is built so near Newgate Prison, and in so obscure a hole, a fault in placing most of our public buildings and churches in the city, through the avarice of some few men, and his Majesty not overruling it, when it was in his power after the dreadful conflagration.
20th March, 1683. Had dinner at Dr. Whistler's place, at the Physicians' College, with Sir Thomas Millington, both of them knowledgeable men; Dr. W. is the most amusing person by nature, and currently the Censor of the college. I was consulted here about where they should build their library; it's a shame this college is located so close to Newgate Prison and in such a hidden spot, which is a problem with the placement of most of our public buildings and churches in the city, due to the greed of a few individuals, and the King not intervening, even though he had the power to do so after the terrible fire.
21st March, 1683. Dr. Tenison preached at Whitehall on 1 Cor. vi. 12; I esteem him to be one of the most profitable preachers in the Church of England, being also of a most holy conversation, very learned and ingenious. The pains he takes and care of his parish will, I fear, wear him out, which would be an inexpressible loss.
21st March, 1683. Dr. Tenison preached at Whitehall on 1 Cor. vi. 12; I consider him to be one of the most effective preachers in the Church of England, known for his holy lifestyle, great knowledge, and creativity. The effort and dedication he puts into his parish will, I fear, wear him out, which would be an immense loss.
24th March, 1683. I went to hear Dr. Charleton's lecture on the heart in the Anatomy Theater at the Physicians' College.
24th March, 1683. I attended Dr. Charleton's lecture on the heart in the Anatomy Theater at the Physicians' College.
30th March, 1683. To London, in order to my passing the following week, for the celebration of the Easter now approaching, there being in the Holy Week so many eminent preachers officiating at the Court and other places.[Pg 176]
30th March, 1683. Going to London for my trip next week to celebrate the upcoming Easter, as there are so many notable preachers performing at the Court and other places during Holy Week.[Pg 176]
6th April, 1683. Good Friday. There was in the afternoon, according to custom, a sermon before the King, at Whitehall; Dr. Sprat preached for the Bishop of Rochester.
6th April, 1683. Good Friday. In the afternoon, as is customary, there was a sermon for the King at Whitehall; Dr. Sprat preached on behalf of the Bishop of Rochester.
17th April, 1683. I was at the launching of the last of the thirty ships ordered to be newly built by Act of Parliament, named the "Neptune," a second rate, one of the goodliest vessels of the whole navy, built by my kind neighbor, young Mr. Shish, his Majesty's master shipwright of this dock.
17th April, 1683. I attended the launch of the last of the thirty ships commissioned by Parliament, named the "Neptune," a second-rate ship, one of the finest vessels in the entire navy, built by my kind neighbor, young Mr. Shish, his Majesty's master shipwright at this dock.
1st May, 1683. I went to Blackheath, to see the new fair, being the first procured by the Lord Dartmouth. This was the first day, pretended for the sale of cattle, but I think in truth to enrich the new tavern at the bowling-green, erected by Snape, his Majesty's farrier, a man full of projects. There appeared nothing but an innumerable assembly of drinking people from London, peddlars, etc., and I suppose it too near London to be of any great use to the country.
1st May, 1683. I went to Blackheath to check out the new fair, which was the first organized by Lord Dartmouth. This was the first day, supposedly for selling cattle, but I think it was really about making money for the new tavern at the bowling green, built by Snape, the King's farrier, who’s always coming up with ideas. There was nothing there but a huge crowd of drinkers from London, peddlers, and others, and I suspect it’s too close to London to benefit the countryside much.
March was unusually hot and dry, and all April excessively wet.
March was unusually hot and dry, and April was excessively wet.
I planted all the out limits of the garden and long walks with holly.50
I planted holly all along the edges of the garden and the long walkways. 50
9th May, 1683. Dined at Sir Gabriel Sylvius's and thence to visit the Duke of Norfolk, to ask whether he would part with any of his cartoons and other drawings of Raphael, and the great masters; he told me if he might sell them all together he would, but that the late Sir Peter Lely (our famous painter) had gotten some of his best. The person who desired me to treat for them was Vander Douse, grandson to that great scholar, contemporary and friend of Joseph Scaliger.
9th May, 1683. Had dinner at Sir Gabriel Sylvius's and then went to visit the Duke of Norfolk to see if he would sell any of his cartoons and other drawings by Raphael and the great masters. He said that if he could sell them all together, he would, but that the late Sir Peter Lely (our famous painter) had taken some of his best. The person who asked me to negotiate for them was Vander Douse, grandson of that great scholar and friend of Joseph Scaliger.
16th May, 1683. Came to dinner and visited me Sir Richard Anderson, of Pendley, and his lady, with whom I went to London.
16th May, 1683. I had dinner and visited with Sir Richard Anderson of Pendley and his wife, and then we headed to London.
8th June, 1683. On my return home from the Royal Society, I found Mr. Wilbraham, a young gentleman of Cheshire.
8th June, 1683. On my way home from the Royal Society, I met Mr. Wilbraham, a young man from Cheshire.
11th June, 1683. The Lord Dartmouth was elected Master of the Trinity House; son to George Legge, late[Pg 177] Master of the Ordnance, and one of the grooms of the bedchamber; a great favorite of the Duke's, an active and understanding gentleman in sea affairs.
11th June, 1683. The Lord Dartmouth was elected Master of the Trinity House; he was the son of George Legge, the former Master of the Ordnance, and one of the grooms of the bedchamber. He was a close favorite of the Duke, an active and knowledgeable gentleman in maritime matters.
13th June, 1683. To our Society, where we received the Count de Zinzendorp, Ambassador from the Duke of Saxony, a fine young man; we showed him divers experiments on the magnet, on which subject the Society were upon.
13th June, 1683. To our Society, where we welcomed the Count de Zinzendorp, Ambassador from the Duke of Saxony, a charming young man; we demonstrated various experiments on magnetism, a topic the Society was currently exploring.
16th June, 1683. I went to Windsor, dining by the way at Chiswick, at Sir Stephen Fox's, where I found Sir Robert Howard (that universal pretender), and Signor Verrio, who brought his draught and designs for the painting of the staircase of Sir Stephen's new house.
16th June, 1683. I went to Windsor, having dinner on the way at Chiswick, at Sir Stephen Fox's place, where I met Sir Robert Howard (the ultimate pretender), and Signor Verrio, who brought his sketches and designs for the painting of the staircase in Sir Stephen's new house.
That which was new at Windsor since I was last there, and was surprising to me, was the incomparable fresco painting in St. George's Hall, representing the legend of St. George, and triumph of the Black Prince, and his reception by Edward III.; the volto, or roof, not totally finished; then the Resurrection in the Chapel, where the figure of the Ascension is, in my opinion, comparable to any paintings of the most famous Roman masters; the Last Supper, also over the altar. I liked the contrivance of the unseen organ behind the altar, nor less the stupendous and beyond all description the incomparable carving of our Gibbons, who is, without controversy, the greatest master both for invention and rareness of work, that the world ever had in any age; nor doubt I at all that he will prove as great a master in the statuary art.
What was new at Windsor since my last visit, and what surprised me, was the amazing fresco painting in St. George's Hall, depicting the legend of St. George, the triumph of the Black Prince, and his welcome by Edward III. The ceiling isn’t completely finished yet. Then there's the Resurrection in the Chapel, where the Ascension figure, in my opinion, rivals the works of the most famous Roman masters. The Last Supper is also depicted above the altar. I appreciated the clever design of the hidden organ behind the altar, as well as the incredible and truly unmatched carving by our Gibbons, who is undoubtedly the greatest master in terms of creativity and uniqueness that the world has ever seen at any time; I have no doubt he will also become a great master in the art of sculpture.
Verrio's invention is admirable, his ordnance full and flowing, antique and heroical; his figures move; and, if the walls hold (which is the only doubt by reason of the salts which in time and in this moist climate prejudice), the work will preserve his name to ages.
Verrio's invention is impressive, his artwork rich and vibrant, classic and grand; his figures seem to come alive; and, as long as the walls hold up (which is the only concern due to the salts that could potentially cause damage over time in this damp climate), his work will keep his name alive for generations.
There was now the terrace brought almost round the old castle; the grass made clean, even, and curiously turfed; the avenues to the new park, and other walks, planted with elms and limes, and a pretty canal, and receptacle for fowl; nor less observable and famous is the throwing so huge a quantity of excellent water to the enormous height of the castle, for the use of the whole house, by an extraordinary invention of Sir Samuel Morland.[Pg 178]
The terrace now wrapped around the old castle; the grass was neat, level, and oddly well-turfed; the paths to the new park and other walkways were lined with elms and limes, along with a lovely canal and a spot for birds; equally remarkable and noteworthy was the impressive feat of pumping a massive amount of clear water to the towering height of the castle for the use of the entire house, thanks to the remarkable invention of Sir Samuel Morland.[Pg 178]
17th June, 1683. I dined at the Earl of Sunderland's with the Earls of Bath, Castlehaven, Lords Viscounts Falconberg, Falkland, Bishop of London, the Grand Master of Malta, brother to the Duke de Vendôme (a young wild spark), and Mr. Dryden, the poet. After evening prayer, I walked in the park with my Lord Clarendon, where we fell into discourse of the Bishop of Salisbury (Dr. Seth Ward), his subtlety, etc. Dr. Durell, late Dean of Windsor, being dead, Dr. Turner, one of the Duke's chaplains was made dean.
17th June, 1683. I had dinner at the Earl of Sunderland's with the Earls of Bath, Castlehaven, Lords Viscounts Falconberg, Falkland, the Bishop of London, the Grand Master of Malta, the brother of the Duke de Vendôme (a young reckless guy), and Mr. Dryden, the poet. After evening prayer, I walked in the park with Lord Clarendon, where we talked about the Bishop of Salisbury (Dr. Seth Ward), his cleverness, and so on. Dr. Durell, the former Dean of Windsor, had passed away, and Dr. Turner, one of the Duke’s chaplains, was appointed dean.
I visited my Lady Arlington, groom of the stole to her Majesty, who being hardly set down to supper, word was brought her that the Queen was going into the park to walk, it being now near eleven at night; the alarm caused the Countess to rise in all haste, and leave her supper to us.
I visited Lady Arlington, the Queen's wardrobe manager, who had just started her dinner when we heard that the Queen was going for a walk in the park, even though it was almost eleven at night. This news made the Countess quickly get up and leave her dinner to us.
By this one may take an estimate of the extreme slavery and subjection that courtiers live in, who had not time to eat and drink at their pleasure. It put me in mind of Horace's "Mouse," and to bless God for my own private condition.
By this, one can gauge the sheer level of slavery and subjugation that courtiers experience, who barely have time to eat and drink as they wish. It reminded me of Horace's "Mouse," and made me grateful for my own private situation.
Here was Monsieur de l'Angle, the famous minister of Charenton, lately fled from the persecution in France, concerning the deplorable condition of the Protestants there.
Here was Monsieur de l'Angle, the famous minister of Charenton, who had recently escaped from the persecution in France regarding the terrible situation of the Protestants there.
18th June, 1683. I was present, and saw and heard the humble submission and petition of the Lord Mayor, sheriffs, and aldermen, on behalf of the city of London, on the quo warranto against their charter which they delivered to his Majesty in the presence chamber. It was delivered kneeling, and then the King and Council went into the council chamber, the mayor and his brethren attending still in the presence chamber. After a short space they were called in, and my Lord Keeper made a speech to them, exaggerating the disorderly and riotous behavior in the late election, and polling for Papillon and Du Bois after the Common hall had been formally dissolved: with other misdemeanors, libels on the government, etc., by which they had incurred his Majesty's high displeasure: and that but for this submission, and under such articles as the King should require their obedience to, he would certainly enter judgment against them, which hitherto he had suspended. The things[Pg 179] required were as follows: that they should neither elect mayor, sheriffs, aldermen, recorder, common Serjeant town clerk, coroner, nor steward of Southwark, without his Majesty's approbation; and that if they presented any his Majesty did not like, they should proceed in wonted manner to a second choice; if that was disapproved, his Majesty to nominate them; and if within five days they thought good to assent to this, all former miscarriages should be forgotten. And so they tamely parted with their so ancient privileges after they had dined and been treated by the King. This was a signal and most remarkable period. What the consequences will prove, time will show. Divers of the old and most learned lawyers and judges were of opinion that they could not forfeit their charter, but might be personally punished for their misdemeanors; but the plurality of the younger judges and rising men judged it otherwise.
18th June, 1683. I was there and witnessed the humble submission and petition of the Lord Mayor, sheriffs, and aldermen on behalf of the city of London regarding the quo warranto against their charter, which they presented to the King in the presence chamber. They delivered it while kneeling, and then the King and Council went into the council chamber, while the mayor and his colleagues remained in the presence chamber. After a short while, they were called in, and my Lord Keeper gave a speech to them, emphasizing the disorderly and riotous behavior during the recent election, especially voting for Papillon and Du Bois after the Common hall had been formally dissolved, along with other wrongdoings and attacks on the government that had led to the King’s disapproval. He indicated that without this submission and under the conditions the King would set for their obedience, he would surely rule against them, which he had so far held off from doing. The conditions required were as follows: they should not elect a mayor, sheriffs, aldermen, recorder, common serjeant, town clerk, coroner, or steward of Southwark without the King’s approval; and if they presented someone he did not approve of, they were to proceed with a second choice; if that was also disapproved, the King would nominate someone; and if within five days they agreed to this, all previous issues would be forgotten. So, they passively gave up their long-standing privileges after having dined and been entertained by the King. This was a significant and noteworthy moment. The outcomes of this will be revealed over time. Many of the older and most knowledgeable lawyers and judges believed they could not lose their charter but could face personal punishment for their misdeeds; however, most of the younger judges and rising legal minds thought differently.
The Popish Plot also, which had hitherto made such a noise, began now sensibly to dwindle, through the folly, knavery, impudence, and giddiness of Oates, so as the Papists began to hold up their heads higher than ever, and those who had fled, flocked to London from abroad. Such sudden changes and eager doings there had been without anything steady or prudent, for these last seven years.
The Popish Plot, which had previously created such a commotion, started to noticeably fade due to the foolishness, deceit, shamelessness, and recklessness of Oates. As a result, the Catholics began to feel more empowered than ever, and those who had fled returned to London from abroad. There had been such sudden changes and frantic actions over the past seven years, without anything stable or sensible.
19th June, 1683. I returned to town in a coach with the Earl of Clarendon, when passing by the glorious palace of his father, built but a few years before, which they were now demolishing, being sold to certain undertakers, I turned my head the contrary way till the coach had gone past it, lest I might minister occasion of speaking of it; which must needs have grieved him, that in so short a time their pomp was fallen.
19th June, 1683. I came back to town in a carriage with the Earl of Clarendon. As we passed by the magnificent palace his father had built just a few years ago, which they were now tearing down after selling it to some contractors, I turned my head the other way until the carriage had moved past it. I didn’t want to bring it up, as it would have certainly upset him to see their former glory diminished so quickly.
28th June, 1683. After the Popish Plot, there was now a new and (as they called it) a Protestant Plot discovered, that certain Lords and others should design the assassination of the King and the Duke as they were to come from Newmarket, with a general rising of the nation, and especially of the city of London, disaffected to the present Government. Upon which were committed to the Tower, the Lord Russell, eldest son of the Earl of Bedford, the Earl of Essex, Mr. Algernon Sidney, son to the old Earl of Leicester, Mr. Trenchard, Hampden, Lord[Pg 180] Howard of Escrick, and others. A proclamation was issued against my Lord Grey, the Duke of Monmouth, Sir Thomas Armstrong, and one Ferguson, who had escaped beyond sea; of these some were said to be for killing the King, others for only seizing on him, and persuading him to new counsels, on the pretense of the danger of Popery, should the Duke live to succeed, who was now again admitted to the councils and cabinet secrets. The Lords Essex and Russell were much deplored, for believing they had any evil intention against the King, or the Church; some thought they were cunningly drawn in by their enemies for not approving some late counsels and management relating to France, to Popery, to the persecution of the Dissenters, etc. They were discovered by the Lord Howard of Escrick and some false brethren of the club, and the design happily broken; had it taken effect, it would, to all appearance, have exposed the Government to unknown and dangerous events; which God avert!
28th June, 1683. After the Popish Plot, a new conspiracy, referred to as the Protestant Plot, was uncovered. Certain Lords and others were said to be planning to assassinate the King and the Duke as they traveled from Newmarket, alongside a nationwide uprising, particularly from the city of London, which was discontent with the current Government. As a result, several people were sent to the Tower, including Lord Russell, the eldest son of the Earl of Bedford, the Earl of Essex, Mr. Algernon Sidney, son of the old Earl of Leicester, Mr. Trenchard, Hampden, and Lord Howard of Escrick, among others. A proclamation was issued against my Lord Grey, the Duke of Monmouth, Sir Thomas Armstrong, and a man named Ferguson, who had fled abroad. Some were accused of wanting to kill the King, while others were only aiming to seize him and convince him to change his advisors, citing potential dangers associated with Popery if the Duke were to succeed, as he had recently been readmitted to the councils and cabinet secrets. Lords Essex and Russell were deeply regretted, as many believed they had no harmful intentions against the King or the Church; some speculated that their enemies had tricked them for not supporting recent policies regarding France, Popery, and the persecution of the Dissenters. They were exposed by Lord Howard of Escrick and some traitorous members of their group, and the plot was fortunately thwarted; had it succeeded, it would likely have led the Government into unknown and perilous situations—God forbid!
Was born my granddaughter at Sayes Court, and christened by the name of Martha Maria, our Vicar officiating. I pray God bless her, and may she choose the better part!
Was born my granddaughter at Sayes Court, and baptized with the name of Martha Maria, with our Vicar presiding. I pray God bless her, and may she choose the better path!
13th July, 1683. As I was visiting Sir Thomas Yarborough and his Lady, in Covent Garden, the astonishing news was brought to us of the Earl of Essex having cut his throat, having been but three days a prisoner in the Tower, and this happened on the very day and instant that Lord Russell was on his trial, and had sentence of death. This accident exceedingly amazed me, my Lord Essex being so well known by me to be a person of such sober and religious deportment, so well at his ease, and so much obliged to the King. It is certain the King and Duke were at the Tower, and passed by his window about the same time this morning, when my Lord asking for a razor, shut himself into a closet, and perpetrated the horrid act. Yet it was wondered by some how it was possible he should do it in the manner he was found, for the wound was so deep and wide, that being cut through the gullet, windpipe, and both the jugulars, it reached to the very vertebræ of the neck, so that the head held to it by a very little skin as it were; the gapping too of the razor, and cutting his own fingers, was a little[Pg 181] strange; but more, that having passed the jugulars he should have strength to proceed so far, that an executioner could hardly have done more with an ax. There were odd reflections upon it.
13th July, 1683. While visiting Sir Thomas Yarborough and his wife in Covent Garden, we received the shocking news that the Earl of Essex had committed suicide by cutting his throat, just three days after becoming a prisoner in the Tower. This occurred on the very day that Lord Russell was on trial and received a death sentence. I was extremely surprised by this event, as I knew the Earl of Essex to be a very sober and religious man, well-adjusted, and quite loyal to the King. It’s known that the King and Duke were at the Tower and passed by his window around the same time this morning when the Earl asked for a razor, then locked himself in a closet and committed this horrific act. Many were puzzled by how he managed to do it in the way he was found, as the wound was so deep and wide—cutting through the esophagus, windpipe, and both jugular veins, reaching down to the vertebrae of his neck, with only a little skin holding his head on. The way the razor was gaping and the fact that he cut his own fingers was quite strange; even more so considering that after cutting the jugulars, he had the strength to go that far—an executioner would have had a hard time doing more with an axe. People had odd thoughts about it.
The fatal news coming to Hicks's Hall upon the article of my Lord Russell's trial, was said to have had no little influence on the Jury and all the Bench to his prejudice. Others said that he had himself on some occasions hinted that in case he should be in danger of having his life taken from him by any public misfortune, those who thirsted for his estate should miss of their aim; and that he should speak favorably of that Earl of Northumberland,51 and some others, who made away with themselves; but these are discourses so unlike his sober and prudent conversation that I have no inclination to credit them. What might instigate him to this devilish act, I am not able to conjecture. My Lord Clarendon, his brother-in-law, who was with him but the day before, assured me he was then very cheerful, and declared it to be the effect of his innocence and loyalty; and most believe that his Majesty had no severe intentions against him, though he was altogether inexorable as to Lord Russell and some of the rest. For my part, I believe the crafty and ambitious Earl of Shaftesbury had brought them into some dislike of the present carriage of matters at Court, not with any design of destroying the monarchy (which Shaftesbury had in confidence and for unanswerable reasons told me he would support to his last breath, as having seen and felt the misery of being under mechanic tyranny), but perhaps of setting up some other whom he might govern, and frame to his own platonic fancy, without much regard to the religion established under the hierarchy, for which he had no esteem; but when he perceived those whom he had engaged to rise, fail of his expectations, and the day past, reproaching his accomplices that a second day for an exploit of this nature was never successful, he gave them the slip, and got into Holland, where the fox died, three months before these unhappy Lords and others were discovered or suspected. Every one deplored Essex and Russell, especially the last, as being thought to have been[Pg 182] drawn in on pretense only of endeavoring to rescue the King from his present councilors, and secure religion from Popery, and the nation from arbitrary government, now so much apprehended; while the rest of those who were fled, especially Ferguson and his gang, had doubtless some bloody design to get up a Commonwealth, and turn all things topsy-turvy. Of the same tragical principles is Sydney.
The shocking news reaching Hicks's Hall about Lord Russell's trial is said to have significantly affected the jury and all the judges against him. Some claimed that he had hinted at times that if he were ever in danger of losing his life due to some public disaster, those who were eager for his estate would fail in their aim; and that he had spoken positively about the Earl of Northumberland and others who had taken their own lives. However, these statements sound so unlike his usual calm and sensible talk that I find it hard to believe them. I can't guess what could have driven him to such a wicked act. My Lord Clarendon, his brother-in-law, who had been with him just the day before, assured me he was very cheerful, claiming it was a sign of his innocence and loyalty; most people believe that the King had no serious intentions against him, although he was completely unyielding towards Lord Russell and some others. Personally, I think the cunning and ambitious Earl of Shaftesbury had turned them against the current state of affairs at Court, not intending to destroy the monarchy (which Shaftesbury had confidently told me he would support to his last breath, having experienced the misery of being under harsh tyranny), but perhaps to promote someone else whom he could control and shape to his own ideal, without much regard for the established religion under the hierarchy, which he held in low esteem. But when he saw that those he had rallied to rise failed to meet his expectations, and as the day went on, he reproached his accomplices that a second day for such a venture was never successful, he slipped away and fled to Holland, where the fox died, three months before these unfortunate Lords and others were discovered or suspected. Everyone mourned Essex and Russell, especially the latter, who was thought to have been drawn in under the pretense of trying to rescue the King from his current advisors, and to protect the church from Catholicism, and the nation from the feared arbitrary government; while the others who had fled, particularly Ferguson and his group, surely harbored some bloody plan to establish a Commonwealth and turn everything upside down. Sydney shares these tragic principles.
I had this day much discourse with Monsieur Pontaq, son to the famous and wise prime President of Bordeaux. This gentleman was owner of that excellent vignoble of Pontaq and O'Brien, from whence come the choicest of our Bordeaux wines; and I think I may truly say of him, what was not so truly said of St. Paul, that much learning had made him mad. He had studied well in philosophy, but chiefly the Rabbins, and was exceedingly addicted to cabalistical fancies, an eternal hablador [romancer], and half distracted by reading abundance of the extravagant Eastern Jews. He spoke all languages, was very rich, had a handsome person, and was well bred, about forty-five years of age.
I had a long conversation today with Monsieur Pontaq, the son of the famous and wise chief president of Bordeaux. This gentleman owned the excellent vignoble of Pontaq and O'Brien, from which some of the finest Bordeaux wines come; and I think I can honestly say of him what was inaccurately said of St. Paul, that much learning had driven him to madness. He had studied philosophy quite well, particularly the Rabbis, and was extremely drawn to mystical ideas, an incessant talker and somewhat distracted by reading a lot of the extravagant Eastern Jews. He spoke all languages, was very wealthy, had a good-looking appearance, and was well-mannered, around forty-five years old.
14th July, 1683. I visited Mr. Fraser, a learned Scotch gentleman, whom I had formerly recommended to Lord Berkeley for the instruction and government of his son, since dead at sea. He had now been in Holland at the sale of the learned Heinsius's library, and showed me some very rare and curious books, and some MSS., which he had purchased to good value. There were three or four Herbals in miniature, accurately done, divers Roman antiquities of Verona, and very many books of Aldus's impression.
14th July, 1683. I visited Mr. Fraser, an educated Scottish gentleman, whom I had previously recommended to Lord Berkeley for teaching and guiding his son, who has since died at sea. He had recently been in Holland at the sale of the renowned Heinsius's library and showed me some very rare and interesting books, along with some manuscripts, which he had bought at a good price. There were three or four miniature herbals, well done, various Roman antiquities from Verona, and many books from Aldus's printing.
15th July, 1683. A stranger, an old man, preached on Jerem. vi. 8, the not hearkening to instruction, portentous of desolation to a people; much after Bishop Andrew's method, full of logical divisions, in short and broken periods, and Latin sentences, now quite out of fashion in the pulpit, which is grown into a far more profitable way, of plain and practical discourses, of which sort this nation, or any other, never had greater plenty or more profitable (I am confident); so much has it to answer for thriving no better on it.
15th July, 1683. An old man, a stranger, preached on Jeremiah 6:8, about not listening to instruction, which foretells disaster for a people. He followed Bishop Andrew's style, filled with logical divisions, short and fragmented sentences, and Latin phrases, which are now completely out of style in the pulpit. The preaching has shifted to a much more beneficial approach of straightforward and practical talks. In fact, this nation, or any other, has never had such an abundance of these kinds of discourses, which I believe are the reason we aren't thriving as well as we should be.
The public was now in great consternation on the late plot and conspiracy; his Majesty very melancholy,[Pg 183] and not stirring without double guards; all the avenues and private doors about Whitehall and the Park shut up, few admitted to walk in it. The Papists, in the meantime, very jocund; and indeed with reason, seeing their own plot brought to nothing, and turned to ridicule, and now a conspiracy of Protestants, as they called them.
The public was in a state of great confusion over the recent plot and conspiracy; the King was very sad, [Pg 183] and he wasn't moving about without extra guards. All the entrances and private doors around Whitehall and the Park were closed, and only a few were allowed to walk there. Meanwhile, the Catholics were feeling quite happy; and honestly, they had good reason, seeing their own plot fall apart and become a joke, while now there was a conspiracy of Protestants, as they referred to them.
The Turks were likewise in hostility against the German Emperor, almost masters of the Upper Hungary, and drawing toward Vienna. On the other side, the French King (who it is believed brought in the infidels) disturbing his Spanish and Dutch neighbors, having swallowed up almost all Flanders, pursuing his ambition of a fifth universal monarchy; and all this blood and disorder in Christendom had evidently its rise from our defections at home, in a wanton peace, minding nothing but luxury, ambition, and to procure money for our vices. To this add our irreligion and atheism, great ingratitude, and self-interest; the apostacy of some, and the suffering the French to grow so great, and the Hollanders so weak. In a word, we were wanton, mad, and surfeiting with prosperity; every moment unsettling the old foundations, and never constant to anything. The Lord in mercy avert the sad omen, and that we do not provoke him till he bear it no longer!
The Turks were also hostile toward the German Emperor, almost taking control of Upper Hungary and advancing toward Vienna. On the other side, the French King (believed to have invited the infidels) was causing trouble for his Spanish and Dutch neighbors, having nearly taken over all of Flanders, driven by his ambition for a fifth universal monarchy. All this violence and chaos in Christendom clearly stemmed from our failures at home, indulging in a pointless peace while focusing on nothing but luxury, ambition, and raising money for our vices. To this, add our irreligion and atheism, great ingratitude, and self-interest; the apostasy of some, and allowing the French to grow so powerful while the Dutch became so weak. In short, we were reckless, insane, and overflowing with prosperity; constantly shaking the old foundations and never staying true to anything. May the Lord in His mercy avert this grim warning, and may we not provoke Him until He can bear it no longer!
This summer did we suffer twenty French men-of-war to pass our Channel toward the Sound, to help the Danes against the Swedes, who had abandoned the French interest, we not having ready sufficient to guard our coasts, or take cognizance of what they did; though the nation never had more, or a better navy, yet the sea had never so slender a fleet.
This summer we let twenty French warships pass through our Channel towards the Sound to assist the Danes against the Swedes, who had turned away from the French alliance. We didn’t have enough forces ready to protect our coasts or monitor what was going on, even though our nation has never had a better navy; still, the sea had never seen such a small fleet.
19th July, 1683. George, Prince of Denmark, who had landed this day, came to marry the Lady Anne, daughter to the Duke; so I returned home, having seen the young gallant at dinner at Whitehall.
19th July, 1683. George, Prince of Denmark, who arrived today, came to marry Lady Anne, daughter of the Duke; so I went home after seeing the young gentleman at dinner at Whitehall.
20th July, 1683. Several of the conspirators of the lower form were executed at Tyburn; and the next day,
20th July, 1683. Several of the lower-class conspirators were executed at Tyburn; and the next day,
21st July, 1683. Lord Russell was beheaded in Lincoln's Inn Fields, the executioner giving him three butcherly strokes. The speech he made, and the paper which he gave the Sheriff declaring his innocence, the nobleness of the family, the piety and worthiness of the unhappy[Pg 184] gentleman, wrought much pity, and occasioned various discourses on the plot.
21st July, 1683. Lord Russell was executed in Lincoln's Inn Fields, the executioner striking him three brutal blows. The speech he gave and the letter he handed to the Sheriff declaring his innocence, the nobility of his family, and the virtue and worthiness of the unfortunate[Pg 184] gentleman stirred a lot of sympathy and led to various discussions about the plot.
25th July, 1683. I again saw Prince George of Denmark: he had the Danish countenance, blonde, of few words, spoke French but ill, seemed somewhat heavy, but reported to be valiant, and indeed he had bravely rescued and brought off his brother, the King of Denmark, in a battle against the Swedes, when both these Kings were engaged very smartly.
25th July, 1683. I saw Prince George of Denmark again: he had the Danish look, blonde, and was rather quiet. He spoke French poorly, seemed a bit dull, but was said to be brave. In fact, he had courageously saved and brought his brother, the King of Denmark, to safety during a fierce battle against the Swedes, when both kings were actively engaged.
28th July, 1683. He was married to the Lady Anne at Whitehall. Her Court and household to be modeled as the Duke's, her father, had been, and they to continue in England.
28th July, 1683. He married Lady Anne at Whitehall. Her court and household were to be arranged like the Duke's, her father's, and they would remain in England.
1st August, 1683. Came to see me Mr. Flamsted, the famous astronomer, from his Observatory at Greenwich, to draw the meridian from my pendule, etc.
1st August, 1683. Mr. Flamsted, the renowned astronomer, visited me from his Observatory at Greenwich to take measurements from my pendulum, etc.
2d August, 1683. The Countesses of Bristol and Sunderland, aunt and cousin-german of the late Lord Russell, came to visit me, and condole his sad fate. The next day, came Colonel Russell, uncle to the late Lord Russell, and brother to the Earl of Bedford, and with him Mrs. Middleton, that famous and indeed incomparable beauty, daughter to my relation, Sir Robert Needham.
2nd August, 1683. The Countesses of Bristol and Sunderland, the aunt and cousin of the late Lord Russell, came to visit me to express their condolences for his tragic fate. The next day, Colonel Russell, the uncle of the late Lord Russell and brother to the Earl of Bedford, arrived with Mrs. Middleton, that renowned and truly extraordinary beauty, who is the daughter of my relative, Sir Robert Needham.
19th August, 1683. I went to Bromley to visit our Bishop, and excellent neighbor, and to congratulate his now being made Archbishop of York. On the 28th, he came to take his leave of us, now preparing for his journey and residence in his province.
19th August, 1683. I went to Bromley to visit our Bishop, an excellent neighbor, and to congratulate him on becoming the Archbishop of York. On the 28th, he came by to say goodbye as he was getting ready for his journey and stay in his province.
28th August, 1683. My sweet little grandchild, Martha Maria, died, and on the 29th was buried in the parish church.
28th August, 1683. My dear little granddaughter, Martha Maria, passed away, and on the 29th she was buried in the parish church.
2d September, 1683. This morning, was read in the church, after the office was done, the Declaration setting forth the late conspiracy against the King's person.
2nd September, 1683. This morning, after the service was finished, the church read the Declaration outlining the recent conspiracy against the King's life.
3d September, 1683. I went to see what had been done by the Duke of Beaufort on his lately purchased house at Chelsea, which I once had the selling of for the Countess of Bristol, he had made great alterations, but might have built a better house with the materials and the cost he had been at.
3rd September, 1683. I went to check on what the Duke of Beaufort had done to his recently bought house in Chelsea, which I once helped sell for the Countess of Bristol. He made significant changes, but he could have built a better house with the materials and money he spent.
Saw the Countess of Monte Feltre, whose husband I had formerly known, he was a subject of the Pope's, but becoming a Protestant he resided in England, and married[Pg 185] into the family of the Savilles, of Yorkshire. The Count, her late husband, was a very learned gentleman, a great politician, and a goodly man. She was accompanied by her sister, exceedingly skilled in painting, nor did they spare for color on their own faces. They had a great deal of wit.
I met the Countess of Monte Feltre, whose husband I had known before. He was a subject of the Pope, but after becoming a Protestant, he moved to England and married into the Saville family from Yorkshire. The Count, her late husband, was a very educated man, a skilled politician, and a decent person. She was with her sister, who was very talented in painting, and they certainly didn't hold back on makeup. They both had a sharp sense of humor.
9th September, 1683. It being the day of public thanksgiving for his Majesty's late preservation, the former Declaration was again read, and there was an office used, composed for the occasion. A loyal sermon was preached on the divine right of Kings, from Psalm cxliv. 10. "Thou hast preserved David from the peril of the sword."
9th September, 1683. On the day of public thanksgiving for the King's recent protection, the previous Declaration was read again, and a special service was held for the occasion. A heartfelt sermon was delivered on the divine right of Kings, based on Psalm 144:10: "You have delivered David from the danger of the sword."
15th September, 1683. Came to visit me the learned anatomist, Dr. Tyson,52 with some other Fellows of our Society.
15th September, 1683. The knowledgeable anatomist, Dr. Tyson,52 came to visit me along with a few other members of our Society.
16th September, 1683. At the elegant villa and garden of Mr. Bohun, at Lee. He showed me the zinnar tree, or platanus, and told me that since they had planted this kind of tree about the city of Ispahan, in Persia, the plague, which formerly much infested the place, had exceedingly abated of its mortal effects, and rendered it very healthy.
16th September, 1683. At the beautiful villa and garden of Mr. Bohun, in Lee. He showed me the zinnar tree, or platanus, and mentioned that since they started planting this type of tree around the city of Ispahan in Persia, the plague, which used to affect the area significantly, had greatly reduced its deadly impact and made it much healthier.
18th September, 1683. I went to London to visit the Duchess of Grafton, now great with child, a most virtuous and beautiful lady. Dining with her at my Lord Chamberlain's, met my Lord of St. Alban's, now grown so blind, that he could not see to take his meat. He has lived a most easy life, in plenty even abroad, while his Majesty was a sufferer; he has lost immense sums at play, which yet, at about eighty years old, he continues, having one that sits by him to name the spots on the cards. He ate and drank with extraordinary appetite. He is a prudent old courtier, and much enriched since his Majesty's return.
18th September, 1683. I went to London to see the Duchess of Grafton, who is now heavily pregnant, a very virtuous and beautiful woman. While dining with her at my Lord Chamberlain's, I ran into my Lord of St. Alban's, who has now become so blind that he couldn’t even see to eat. He has lived a comfortable life, enjoying plenty even while his Majesty suffered; he has lost huge amounts playing cards, but at about eighty years old, he still plays, with someone sitting beside him to call out the spots on the cards. He ate and drank with remarkable appetite. He is a wise old courtier and has become quite wealthy since his Majesty's return.
After dinner, I walked to survey the sad demolition of Clarendon House, that costly and only sumptuous palace[Pg 186] of the late Lord Chancellor Hyde, where I have often been so cheerful with him, and sometimes so sad: happening to make him a visit but the day before he fled from the angry Parliament, accusing him of maladministration, and being envious at his grandeur, who from a private lawyer came to be father-in-law to the Duke of York, and as some would suggest, designing his Majesty's marriage with the Infanta of Portugal, not apt to breed. To this they imputed much of our unhappiness; and that he, being sole minister and favorite at his Majesty's restoration, neglected to gratify the King's suffering party, preferring those who were the cause of our troubles. But perhaps as many of these things were injuriously laid to his charge, so he kept the government far steadier than it has proved since. I could name some who I think contributed greatly to his ruin,—the buffoons and the MISSIS, to whom he was an eye-sore. It is true he was of a jolly temper, after the old English fashion; but France had now the ascendant, and we were become quite another nation. The Chancellor gone, and dying in exile, the Earl his successor sold that which cost £50,000 building, to the young Duke of Albemarle for £25,000, to pay debts which how contracted remains yet a mystery, his son being no way a prodigal. Some imagine the Duchess his daughter had been chargeable to him. However it were, this stately palace is decreed to ruin, to support the prodigious waste the Duke of Albemarle had made of his estate, since the old man died. He sold it to the highest bidder, and it fell to certain rich bankers and mechanics, who gave for it and the ground about it, £35,000; they design a new town, as it were, and a most magnificent piazza [square]. It is said they have already materials toward it with what they sold of the house alone, more worth than what they paid for it. See the vicissitudes of earthly things! I was astonished at this demolition, nor less at the little army of laborers and artificers leveling the ground, laying foundations, and contriving great buildings at an expense of £200,000, if they perfect their design.
After dinner, I walked to check out the sad destruction of Clarendon House, that expensive and luxurious palace[Pg 186] of the late Lord Chancellor Hyde, where I often had such good times with him, and sometimes felt so down. I was visiting him just the day before he fled from the furious Parliament, which was accusing him of poor management and envious of his status, who went from being a private lawyer to being the father-in-law of the Duke of York, and as some would say, trying to arrange the King’s marriage with the Infanta of Portugal, which was unlikely to happen. They blamed him for much of our misery; that he, as the sole minister and favorite at the King’s restoration, neglected to reward the King’s supporters, choosing instead those who were the source of our troubles. But perhaps many of these accusations were unfair, as he managed the government much more smoothly than it has been since. I could name a few who greatly contributed to his downfall—the jesters and the MRS., who couldn’t stand him. It’s true that he had a cheerful personality, in the old English way; but France was now on top, and we had become a completely different nation. With the Chancellor gone and dying in exile, his successor, the Earl, sold what cost £50,000 to build, to the young Duke of Albemarle for £25,000, to pay off debts that remain a mystery, with his son being no extravagant spender. Some think the Duchess, his daughter, may have been a burden on him. However it was, this grand palace is set for destruction, to cover the enormous loss the Duke of Albemarle has made of his estate since the old man died. He sold it to the highest bidder, and it went to some wealthy bankers and tradesmen, who paid £35,000 for it and the surrounding land; they plan to build a new town, essentially, and a very magnificent square. It’s said they already have materials worth more than what they paid just from the house. Look at the ups and downs of worldly matters! I was shocked by this demolition, as much as I was by the little army of workers and builders leveling the ground, laying foundations, and designing grand buildings at a cost of £200,000, if they complete their plans.
19th September, 1683. In my walks I stepped into a goldbeater's workhouse, where he showed me the wonderful ductility of that spreading and oily metal. He said it must be finer than the standard, such as was[Pg 187] old angel-gold, and that of such he had once to the value of £100 stamped with the agnus dei, and coined at the time of the holy war; which had been found in a ruined wall somewhere in the North, near to Scotland, some of which he beat into leaves, and the rest sold to the curiosi in antiquities and medals.
19th September, 1683. During my strolls, I went into a goldbeater's workshop, where he showed me the amazing flexibility of that shiny and smooth metal. He said it had to be finer than the standard, like what was[Pg 187] old angel-gold, and that he once had £100 worth of it stamped with the agnus dei and minted during the holy war; it had been discovered in a crumbling wall somewhere in the North, near Scotland. He beat some of it into thin sheets and sold the rest to collectors of antiques and medals.
23d September, 1683. We had now the welcome tidings of the King of Poland raising the siege of Vienna, which had given terror to all Europe, and utmost reproach to the French, who it is believed brought in the Turks for diversion, that the French King might the more easily swallow Flanders, and pursue his unjust conquest on the empire, while we sat unconcerned and under a deadly charm from somebody.
23rd September, 1683. We finally received the great news that the King of Poland lifted the siege of Vienna, which had terrified all of Europe and brought shame to the French. It's believed that the French brought in the Turks for distraction so that the French King could more easily take Flanders and continue his unjust conquest of the empire, while we remained indifferent and under some deadly spell.
There was this day a collection for rebuilding Newmarket, consumed by an accidental fire, which removing his Majesty thence sooner than was intended, put by the assassins, who were disappointed of their rendezvous and expectation by a wonderful providence. This made the King more earnest to render Winchester the seat of his autumnal field diversions for the future, designing a palace there, where the ancient castle stood; infinitely indeed preferable to Newmarket for prospects, air, pleasure, and provisions. The surveyor has already begun the foundation for a palace, estimated to cost £35,000, and his Majesty is purchasing ground about it to make a park, etc.
There was a day when a collection was held to help rebuild Newmarket, which had been destroyed by an accidental fire. This fire forced the King to leave earlier than planned, which thwarted the assassins who were expecting to meet him. This unexpected turn of events made the King more determined to make Winchester the location for his autumn field activities in the future, planning to build a palace where the old castle used to be. It was definitely a better choice than Newmarket for its views, air quality, enjoyment, and supplies. The surveyor has already started the foundation for a palace, which is estimated to cost £35,000, and the King is purchasing land around it to create a park, etc.
4th October, 1683. I went to London, on receiving a note from the Countess of Arlington, of some considerable charge or advantage I might obtain by applying myself to his Majesty on this signal conjuncture of his Majesty entering up judgment against the city charter; the proposal made me I wholly declined, not being well satisfied with these violent transactions, and not a little sorry that his Majesty was so often put upon things of this nature against so great a city, the consequence whereof may be so much to his prejudice; so I returned home. At this time, the Lord Chief-Justice Pemberton was displaced. He was held to be the most learned of the judges, and an honest man. Sir George Jeffreys was advanced, reputed to be most ignorant, but most daring. Sir George Treby, Recorder of London, was also put by, and one Genner, an obscure lawyer, set in his place.[Pg 188] Eight of the richest and chief aldermen were removed and all the rest made only justices of the peace, and no more wearing of gowns, or chains of gold; the Lord Mayor and two sheriffs holding their places by new grants as custodes, at the King's pleasure. The pomp and grandeur of the most august city in the world thus changed face in a moment; which gave great occasion of discourse and thoughts of hearts, what all this would end in. Prudent men were for the old foundations.
4th October, 1683. I went to London after getting a note from the Countess of Arlington about a significant opportunity I could gain by approaching His Majesty regarding his current judgment against the city charter. I completely turned down the proposal, as I wasn't comfortable with these drastic actions, and I felt quite sorry that His Majesty was often compelled to take such measures against such a great city, which could lead to serious consequences for him. So, I returned home. At this time, Lord Chief Justice Pemberton was removed from his position. He was considered the most knowledgeable judge and an honest man. Sir George Jeffreys was promoted, known for being quite ignorant but extremely bold. Sir George Treby, Recorder of London, was also dismissed, and an obscure lawyer named Genner took his place.[Pg 188] Eight of the wealthiest and top aldermen were ousted, and the remaining ones were only appointed justices of the peace, no longer able to wear gowns or gold chains; the Lord Mayor and two sheriffs were kept in their positions under new grants as custodes, at the King's discretion. The splendor and magnificence of the most esteemed city in the world changed in an instant, sparking much discussion and speculation about where all of this would lead. Wise men supported the traditional foundations.
Following his Majesty this morning through the gallery, I went with the few who attended him, into the Duchess of Portmouth's DRESSING ROOM within her bedchamber, where she was in her morning loose garment, her maids combing her, newly out of her bed, his Majesty and the gallants standing about her; but that which engaged my curiosity, was the rich and splendid furniture of this woman's apartment, now twice or thrice pulled down and rebuilt to satisfy her prodigal and expensive pleasures, while her Majesty's does not exceed some gentlemen's ladies in furniture and accommodation. Here I saw the new fabric of French tapestry, for design, tenderness of work, and incomparable imitation of the best paintings, beyond anything I had ever beheld. Some pieces had Versailles, St. Germains, and other palaces of the French King, with huntings, figures, and landscapes, exotic fowls, and all to the life rarely done. Then for Japan cabinets, screens, pendule clocks, great vases of wrought plate, tables, stands, chimney-furniture, sconces, branches, braseras, etc., all of massy silver and out of number, besides some of her Majesty's best paintings.
Following the king this morning through the gallery, I joined the few who were with him in the Duchess of Portsmouth's Changing room within her bedroom, where she was in her morning gown, her maids combing her hair as she had just gotten out of bed, while the king and some gentlemen were standing around her. What caught my attention was the extravagant and luxurious decor of her room, which had been rebuilt two or three times to satisfy her lavish spending, while the queen's accommodations were hardly better than those of some gentlemen's wives. Here, I saw the new French tapestry, which was exceptional in design, delicacy of craftsmanship, and an incredible imitation of the finest paintings—beyond anything I had ever seen. Some pieces depicted Versailles, St. Germain, and other palaces of the French king, featuring hunting scenes, figures, landscapes, and exotic birds, all rendered in incredible detail. There were also Japanese cabinets, screens, mantel clocks, large vases made of silver, tables, stands, fireplace accessories, sconces, candlesticks, and so much more, all made of solid silver and in great quantity, in addition to some of the queen's best paintings.
Surfeiting of this, I dined at Sir Stephen Fox's and went contented home to my poor, but quiet villa. What contentment can there be in the riches and splendor of this world, purchased with vice and dishonor?
Having had enough of that, I dined at Sir Stephen Fox's and went happily home to my modest, but peaceful villa. What satisfaction can there be in the wealth and luxury of this world, bought with wrongdoing and disgrace?
10th October, 1683. Visited the Duchess of Grafton, not yet brought to bed, and dining with my Lord Chamberlain (her father), went with them to see Montague House, a palace lately built by Lord Montague, who had married the most beautiful Countess of Northumberland. It is a stately and ample palace. Signor Verrio's fresco paintings, especially the funeral pile of Dido, on the staircase, the labors of Hercules, fight with the Centaurs, his effeminacy with Dejanira, and Apotheosis or reception[Pg 189] among the gods, on the walls and roof of the great room above,—I think exceeds anything he has yet done, both for design, coloring, and exuberance of invention, comparable to the greatest of the old masters, or what they so celebrate at Rome. In the rest of the chamber are some excellent paintings of Holbein, and other masters. The garden is large, and in good air, but the fronts of the house not answerable to the inside. The court at entry, and wings for offices seem too near the street, and that so very narrow and meanly built, that the corridor is not in proportion to the rest, to hide the court from being overlooked by neighbors; all which might have been prevented, had they placed the house further into the ground, of which there was enough to spare. But on the whole it is a fine palace, built after the French pavilion-way, by Mr. Hooke, the Curator of the Royal Society. There were with us my Lady Scroope, the great wit, and Monsieur Chardine, the celebrated traveler.
10th October, 1683. I visited the Duchess of Grafton, who hasn't given birth yet, and after dining with her father, Lord Chamberlain, we went to see Montague House, a recently built palace by Lord Montague, who married the stunning Countess of Northumberland. It's an impressive and spacious palace. Signor Verrio's fresco paintings, especially the funeral pyre of Dido on the staircase, the labors of Hercules fighting the Centaurs, his relationship with Dejanira, and the Apotheosis or reception among the gods on the walls and ceiling of the grand room above— I believe it surpasses anything he has done before, in terms of design, color, and creativity, comparable to the greatest old masters or the highly praised works in Rome. In the rest of the chamber, there are some excellent paintings by Holbein and other masters. The garden is large and has good air, but the exterior of the house doesn't match the interior. The courtyard at the entrance and the wings for offices are too close to the street, which is very narrow and poorly built, so the corridor isn't proportionate to the rest, failing to hide the courtyard from being overlooked by neighbors; all of this could have been avoided if they had placed the house further into the grounds, of which there was enough available. Overall, it is a beautiful palace built in the French pavilion style by Mr. Hooke, the Curator of the Royal Society. Accompanying us were Lady Scroope, the witty one, and Monsieur Chardine, the famous traveler.
13th October, 1683. Came to visit me my old and worthy friend, Mr. Packer, bringing with him his nephew Berkeley, grandson to the honest judge. A most ingenious, virtuous, and religious gentleman, seated near Worcester, and very curious in gardening.
13th October, 1683. My old and respected friend, Mr. Packer, came to visit me, bringing his nephew Berkeley, who is the grandson of the honest judge. He is a very clever, virtuous, and religious man, living near Worcester, and he has a keen interest in gardening.
17th October, 1683. I was at the court-leet of this manor, my Lord Arlington his Majesty's High Steward.
17th October, 1683. I was at the court-leet of this manor, my Lord Arlington, His Majesty's High Steward.
26th October, 1683. Came to visit and dine with me, Mr. Brisbane, Secretary to the Admiralty, a learned and agreeable man.
26th October, 1683. Mr. Brisbane, Secretary to the Admiralty, a knowledgeable and pleasant man, came to visit and have dinner with me.
30th October, 1683. I went to Kew to visit Sir Henry Capell, brother to the late Earl of Essex; but he being gone to Cashiobury, after I had seen his garden and the alterations therein, I returned home. He had repaired his house, roofed his hall with a kind of cupola, and in a niche was an artificial fountain; but the room seems to me over-melancholy, yet might be much improved by having the walls well painted á fresco. The two green houses for oranges and myrtles, communicating with the rooms below, are very well contrived. There is a cupola made with pole-work between two elms at the end of a walk, which being covered by plashing the trees to them, is very pretty; for the rest there are too many fir trees in the garden.[Pg 190]
30th October, 1683. I went to Kew to visit Sir Henry Capell, brother of the late Earl of Essex; but he was away at Cashiobury. After checking out his garden and the changes made there, I headed back home. He had renovated his house, adding a dome to his hall, and there was an artificial fountain in a niche; however, the room feels a bit too gloomy to me and could be greatly improved with some good fresco painting on the walls. The two greenhouses for oranges and myrtles, which connect to the rooms below, are really well designed. There's a dome made from pole-work between two elms at the end of a path, which looks lovely since it's covered with the trees; but overall, there are too many fir trees in the garden.[Pg 190]
17th November, 1683. I took a house in Villiers Street, York Buildings, for the winter, having many important concerns to dispatch, and for the education of my daughters.
17th November, 1683. I rented a house on Villiers Street, York Buildings, for the winter, as I had many important matters to take care of and to provide for my daughters' education.
23d November, 1683. The Duke of Monmouth, till now proclaimed traitor on the pretended plot for which Lord Russell was lately beheaded, came this evening to Whitehall and rendered himself, on which were various discourses.
23rd November, 1683. The Duke of Monmouth, who was previously labeled a traitor in the supposed conspiracy that led to Lord Russell's recent execution, arrived at Whitehall this evening and surrendered himself, which sparked various discussions.
26th November, 1683. I went to compliment the Duchess of Grafton, now lying-in of her first child, a son, which she called for, that I might see it. She was become more beautiful, if it were possible, than before, and full of virtue and sweetness. She discoursed with me of many particulars, with great prudence and gravity beyond her years.
26th November, 1683. I went to congratulate the Duchess of Grafton, who was in labor with her first child, a son, whom she wanted me to see. She had become even more beautiful, if that was possible, and was filled with virtue and kindness. She talked with me about many details, showing great wisdom and seriousness beyond her age.
29th November, 1683. Mr. Forbes showed me the plot of the garden making at Burleigh, at my Lord Exeter's, which I looked on as one of the most noble that I had seen.
29th November, 1683. Mr. Forbes showed me the layout of the garden being made at Burleigh, at Lord Exeter's, which I considered one of the most impressive I had ever seen.
The whole court and town in solemn mourning for the death of the King of Portugal, her Majesty's brother.
The entire court and town are in deep mourning for the death of the King of Portugal, her Majesty's brother.
30th November, 1683. At the anniversary dinner of the Royal Society the King sent us two does. Sir Cyril Wych was elected President.
30th November, 1683. At the anniversary dinner of the Royal Society, the King sent us two female deer. Sir Cyril Wych was elected as President.
5th December, 1683. I was this day invited to a wedding of one Mrs. Castle, to whom I had some obligation, and it was to her fifth husband, a lieutenant-colonel of the city. She was the daughter of one Burton, a broom-man, by his wife, who sold kitchen stuff in Kent Street, whom God so blessed that the father became a very rich, and was a very honest man; he was sheriff of Surrey, where I have sat on the bench with him. Another of his daughters was married to Sir John Bowles; and this daughter was a jolly friendly woman. There was at the wedding the Lord Mayor, the Sheriff, several Aldermen and persons of quality; above all, Sir George Jeffreys, newly made Lord Chief Justice of England, with Mr. Justice Withings, danced with the bride, and were exceedingly merry. These great men spent the rest of the afternoon, till eleven at night, in drinking healths, taking tobacco, and talking much beneath the gravity of judges, who had but a day or two before condemned Mr. Algernon Sidney, who was executed the 7th on Tower Hill, on the single witness of that monster of a man, Lord[Pg 191] Howard of Escrick, and some sheets of paper taken in Mr. Sidney's study, pretended to be written by him, but not fully proved, nor the time when, but appearing to have been written before his Majesty's Restoration, and then pardoned by the Act of Oblivion; so that though Mr. Sidney was known to be a person obstinately averse to government by a monarch (the subject of the paper was in answer to one by Sir E. Filmer), yet it was thought he had very hard measure. There is this yet observable, that he had been an inveterate enemy to the last king, and in actual rebellion against him; a man of great courage, great sense, great parts, which he showed both at his trial and death; for, when he came on the scaffold, instead of a speech, he told them only that he had made his peace with God, that he came not thither to talk, but to die; put a paper into the sheriff's hand, and another into a friend's; said one prayer as short as a grace, laid down his neck, and bid the executioner do his office.
5th December, 1683. I was invited today to the wedding of Mrs. Castle, to whom I owed a debt of gratitude. This wedding was for her fifth husband, a lieutenant-colonel in the city. She was the daughter of a man named Burton, a broom maker, and his wife, who sold kitchen goods in Kent Street. God blessed them, and the father became very wealthy and was a straightforward man; he served as sheriff of Surrey, where I have sat on the bench with him. One of his other daughters married Sir John Bowles, and this daughter was a jolly, friendly woman. At the wedding were the Lord Mayor, the Sheriff, several Aldermen, and people of stature; most notably, Sir George Jeffreys, who had just been appointed Lord Chief Justice of England, along with Mr. Justice Withings, who danced with the bride and had a great time. These important men spent the rest of the afternoon, until eleven at night, drinking toasts, smoking tobacco, and engaging in discussions that were far less serious than you'd expect from judges, especially since just a day or two earlier, they had condemned Mr. Algernon Sidney, who was executed on the 7th at Tower Hill, based solely on the testimony of that monster, Lord Howard of Escrick, and some documents found in Mr. Sidney's study that were allegedly written by him, but not definitively proven, nor dated properly. They seemed to have been written before the King’s Restoration and then pardoned under the Act of Oblivion; thus, even though Mr. Sidney was known to strongly oppose monarchy (the subject of the paper was a response to one from Sir E. Filmer), it was thought he received very harsh treatment. It’s also worth noting that he had been a determined enemy of the last king and was in open rebellion against him; he was a man of great courage, intelligence, and talent, which he displayed both at his trial and at his execution. When he stepped onto the scaffold, instead of making a speech, he simply told them that he had made peace with God, that he was there not to speak but to die; he handed a paper to the sheriff and another to a friend; said a prayer as brief as a grace, laid down his neck, and told the executioner to proceed.
The Duke of Monmouth, now having his pardon, refuses to acknowledge there was any treasonable plot; for which he is banished Whitehall. This is a great disappointment to some who had prosecuted Trenchard, Hampden, etc., that for want of a second witness were come out of the Tower upon their habeas corpus.
The Duke of Monmouth, now that he has his pardon, denies there was any treasonous plot; for this, he is expelled from Whitehall. This is a big letdown for some who had gone after Trenchard, Hampden, etc., who, due to a lack of a second witness, had been released from the Tower on their habeas corpus.
The King had now augmented his guards with a new sort of dragoons, who carried also grenades, and were habited after the Polish manner, with long peaked caps, very fierce and fantastical.
The King had now added more guards with a new type of dragoons, who also carried grenades and were dressed in a Polish style, wearing long pointed caps that looked very fierce and unusual.
7th December, 1683. I went to the Tower, and visited the Earl of Danby, the late Lord High Treasurer, who had been imprisoned four years: he received me with great kindness. I dined with him, and stayed till night. We had discourse of many things, his Lady railing sufficiently at the keeping her husband so long in prison. Here I saluted the Lord Dumblaine's wife, who before had been married to Emerton, and about whom there was that scandalous business before the delegates.
7th December, 1683. I went to the Tower and visited the Earl of Danby, the former Lord High Treasurer, who had been imprisoned for four years. He welcomed me warmly. I had dinner with him and stayed until night. We talked about many topics, and his wife expressed her frustration about her husband being kept in prison for so long. Here, I greeted the wife of Lord Dumblaine, who had previously been married to Emerton, and there was that scandalous situation involving her that had come up before the delegates.
23d December, 1683. The smallpox very prevalent and mortal; the Thames frozen.
23rd December, 1683. Smallpox is widespread and deadly; the Thames is frozen.
26th December, 1683. I dined at Lord Clarendon's, where I was to meet that ingenious and learned gentleman, Sir George Wheeler, who has published the excellent[Pg 192] description of Africa and Greece, and who, being a knight of a very fair estate and young, had now newly entered into holy orders.
26th December, 1683. I had dinner at Lord Clarendon's, where I was supposed to meet the clever and knowledgeable Sir George Wheeler, who has published the excellent[Pg 192] description of Africa and Greece. He is a young knight with a good estate and has recently taken holy orders.
27th December, 1683. I went to visit Sir John Chardin, a French gentleman, who traveled three times by land into Persia, and had made many curious researches in his travels, of which he was now setting forth a relation. It being in England this year one of the severest frosts that has happened of many years, he told me the cold in Persia was much greater, the ice of an incredible thickness; that they had little use of iron in all that country, it being so moist (though the air admirably clear and healthy) that oil would not preserve it from rusting, so that they had neither clocks nor watches; some padlocks they had for doors and boxes.
27th December, 1683. I went to visit Sir John Chardin, a French gentleman who had traveled to Persia three times by land and conducted many fascinating studies during his journeys, which he was now beginning to recount. This year in England, we were experiencing one of the harshest frosts in many years, and he told me that the cold in Persia was even more intense, with ice of incredible thickness. He mentioned that they hardly used iron in that country because it was so damp (even though the air was remarkably clear and healthy), and oil wouldn’t protect it from rusting. As a result, they didn’t have clocks or watches; they only had a few padlocks for doors and boxes.
30th December, 1683. Dr. Sprat, now made Dean of Westminster, preached to the King at Whitehall, on Matt. vi. 24. Recollecting the passages of the past year, I gave God thanks for his mercies, praying his blessing for the future.
30th December, 1683. Dr. Sprat, now the Dean of Westminster, preached to the King at Whitehall, on Matt. vi. 24. Reflecting on the events of the past year, I thanked God for His blessings and prayed for His guidance in the future.
1st January, 1683-84. The weather continuing intolerably severe, streets of booths were set up on the Thames; the air was so very cold and thick, as of many years there had not been the like. The smallpox was very mortal.
1st January, 1683-84. The weather remained unbearably harsh, with rows of booths set up on the Thames; the air was extremely cold and heavy, something not experienced in many years. Smallpox was very deadly.
2d January, 1684. I dined at Sir Stephen Fox's: after dinner came a fellow who ate live charcoal, glowingly ignited, quenching them in his mouth, and then champing and swallowing them down. There was a dog also which seemed to do many rational actions.
2d January, 1684. I had dinner at Sir Stephen Fox's place: after dinner, a guy came in who ate live charcoal, glowing hot, putting it out in his mouth, and then chewing and swallowing it. There was also a dog that seemed to perform many intelligent actions.
6th January, 1684. The river quite frozen.
6th January, 1684. The river is completely frozen.
9th January, 1684. I went across the Thames on the ice, now become so thick as to bear not only streets of booths, in which they roasted meat, and had divers shops of wares, quite across as in a town, but coaches, carts, and horses passed over. So I went from Westminster stairs to Lambeth, and dined with the Archbishop: where I met my Lord Bruce, Sir George Wheeler, Colonel Cooke, and several divines. After dinner and discourse with his Grace till evening prayers, Sir George Wheeler and I walked over the ice from Lambeth stairs to the Horse-ferry.
9th January, 1684. I crossed the Thames on the ice, which had gotten so thick that it could support not only rows of stalls where they were roasting meat and various shops selling goods, as if it were a town, but also coaches, carts, and horses moved across it. I traveled from Westminster stairs to Lambeth and had dinner with the Archbishop, where I met Lord Bruce, Sir George Wheeler, Colonel Cooke, and several clergymen. After dinner and a conversation with his Grace until evening prayers, Sir George Wheeler and I walked over the ice from Lambeth stairs to the Horse-ferry.
10th January, 1684. I visited Sir Robert Reading, where after supper we had music, but not comparable to that[Pg 193] which Mrs. Bridgeman made us on the guitar with such extraordinary skill and dexterity.
10th January, 1684. I went to Sir Robert Reading's place, where after dinner we enjoyed some music, but it couldn't compare to the music[Pg 193] that Mrs. Bridgeman played for us on the guitar with such incredible skill and talent.
16th January, 1684. The Thames was filled with people and tents selling all sorts of wares as in the city.
16th January, 1684. The Thames was packed with people and tents selling all kinds of goods, just like in the city.
24th January, 1684. The frost continues more and more severe, the Thames before London was still planted with booths in formal streets, all sorts of trades and shops furnished, and full of commodities, even to a printing press, where the people and ladies took a fancy to have their names printed, and the day and year set down when printed on the Thames: this humor took so universally, that it was estimated that the printer gained £5 a day, for printing a line only, at sixpence a name, besides what he got by ballads, etc. Coaches plied from Westminster to the Temple, and from several other stairs to and fro, as in the streets, sleds, sliding with skates, a bull-baiting, horse and coach-races, puppet-plays and interludes, cooks, tippling, and other lewd places, so that it seemed to be a bacchanalian triumph, or carnival on the water, while it was a severe judgment on the land, the trees not only splitting as if the lightning struck, but men and cattle perishing in divers places, and the very seas so locked up with ice, that no vessels could stir out or come in. The fowls, fish, and birds, and all our exotic plants and greens, universally perishing. Many parks of deer were destroyed, and all sorts of fuel so dear, that there were great contributions to preserve the poor alive. Nor was this severe weather much less intense in most parts of Europe, even as far as Spain and the most southern tracts. London, by reason of the excessive coldness of the air hindering the ascent of the smoke, was so filled with the fuliginous steam of the sea-coal, that hardly could one see across the street, and this filling the lungs with its gross particles, exceedingly obstructed the breast, so as one could scarcely breathe. Here was no water to be had from the pipes and engines, nor could the brewers and divers other tradesmen work, and every moment was full of disastrous accidents.
24th January, 1684. The frost is becoming more and more severe. The Thames in front of London is still lined with booths set up in neat rows, with all kinds of trades and shops stocked with goods, even a printing press where people, including ladies, wanted their names printed along with the date when it was done on the Thames. This trend became so popular that it was estimated the printer made £5 a day for printing just a line at sixpence a name, in addition to what he earned from ballads, etc. Coaches were running from Westminster to the Temple, and from various other wharves back and forth, while in the streets, there were sledges, skating, bull-baiting, horse and carriage races, puppet shows, and drinking spots, making it seem like a wild carnival on the water, despite it being a harsh time for the land. The trees were splitting as if struck by lightning, and many men and cattle were dying in various places. The seas were so frozen that no ships could leave or enter. Birds, fish, and all our exotic plants and greens were perishing everywhere. Many deer parks were destroyed, and all kinds of fuel became so expensive that there were significant efforts to keep the poor alive. This extreme weather was felt across much of Europe, even as far as Spain and the southern regions. London, due to the intense cold air preventing the smoke from rising, was filled with thick smoke from coal that made it hard to see across the street. It also filled the lungs with heavy particles, making it difficult to breathe. There was no water available from the pipes and pumps, and brewers and various other tradespeople couldn’t work, leading to constant accidents and disasters.
4th February, 1684. I went to Sayes Court to see how the frost had dealt with my garden, where I found many of the greens and rare plants utterly destroyed. The oranges and myrtles very sick, the rosemary and laurels[Pg 194] dead to all appearance, but the cypress likely to endure it.
4th February, 1684. I went to Sayes Court to see how the frost had affected my garden, where I found that many of the greens and rare plants were completely destroyed. The oranges and myrtles looked very sick, the rosemary and laurels[Pg 194] appeared totally dead, but the cypress seemed likely to survive.
5th February, 1684. It began to thaw, but froze again. My coach crossed from Lambeth, to the Horse-ferry at Milbank, Westminster. The booths were almost all taken down; but there was first a map or landscape cut in copper representing all the manner of the camp, and the several actions, sports, and pastimes thereon, in memory of so signal a frost.
5th February, 1684. It started to thaw, but then froze again. My coach traveled from Lambeth to the Horse-ferry at Milbank, Westminster. Most of the booths were already taken down; however, there was still a map or landscape etched in copper showing all kinds of the camp, along with various activities, sports, and pastimes there, in memory of such a remarkable frost.
7th February, 1684. I dined with my Lord Keeper, [North], and walking alone with him some time in his gallery, we had discourse of music. He told me he had been brought up to it from a child, so as to sing his part at first sight. Then speaking of painting, of which he was also a great lover, and other ingenious matters, he desired me to come oftener to him.
7th February, 1684. I had dinner with my Lord Keeper, [North], and while walking alone with him for a while in his gallery, we talked about music. He mentioned that he had been trained in it since childhood, and could sing his part at first sight. Then, when we discussed painting, which he was also passionate about, as well as other creative subjects, he asked me to visit him more often.
8th February, 1684. I went this evening to visit that great and knowing virtuoso, Monsieur Justell. The weather was set in to an absolute thaw and rain; but the Thames still frozen.
8th February, 1684. I went this evening to visit that great and knowledgeable expert, Monsieur Justell. The weather had turned to a complete thaw and rain; however, the Thames was still frozen.
10th February, 1684. After eight weeks missing the foreign posts, there came abundance of intelligence from abroad.
10th February, 1684. After eight weeks without news from overseas, a lot of information arrived from abroad.
12th February, 1684. The Earl of Danby, late Lord-Treasurer, together with the Roman Catholic Lords impeached of high treason in the Popish Plot, had now their habeas corpus, and came out upon bail, after five years' imprisonment in the Tower. Then were also tried and deeply fined Mr. Hampden and others, for being supposed of the late plot, for which Lord Russell and Colonel Sidney suffered; as also the person who went about to prove that the Earl of Essex had his throat cut in the Tower by others; likewise Mr. Johnson, the author of that famous piece called Julian.
February 12, 1684. The Earl of Danby, former Lord Treasurer, along with the Roman Catholic Lords accused of high treason in the Popish Plot, were granted their habeas corpus and released on bail after five years of imprisonment in the Tower. Mr. Hampden and others were also put on trial and heavily fined for being suspected of the recent plot that led to the deaths of Lord Russell and Colonel Sidney; additionally, there was a person attempting to prove that the Earl of Essex had been murdered in the Tower; and Mr. Johnson, the author of the well-known work called Julian.
15th February, 1684. News of the Prince of Orange having accused the Deputies of Amsterdam of crimen læsæ Majestatis, and being pensioners to France.
15th February, 1684. News that the Prince of Orange has accused the Deputies of Amsterdam of crimen læsæ Majestatis and of being pensioners to France.
Dr. Tenison communicated to me his intention of erecting a library in St. Martin's parish, for the public use, and desired my assistance, with Sir Christopher Wren, about the placing and structure thereof, a worthy and laudable design. He told me there were thirty or forty young men in Orders in his parish, either governors to[Pg 195] young gentlemen or chaplains to noblemen, who being reproved by him on occasion for frequenting taverns or coffeehouses, told him they would study or employ their time better, if they had books. This put the pious Doctor on this design; and indeed a great reproach it is that so great a city as London should not have a public library becoming it. There ought to be one at St. Paul's; the west end of that church (if ever finished) would be a convenient place.
Dr. Tenison shared with me his plan to build a library in St. Martin's parish for everyone to use, and he asked for my help, along with Sir Christopher Wren, regarding its layout and construction—a worthy and commendable initiative. He mentioned that there were about thirty or forty young men in his parish who were either mentors to young gentlemen or chaplains to noblemen. When he reprimanded them for spending too much time in taverns or coffeehouses, they replied that they would study or use their time better if they had books. This inspired the dedicated Doctor to pursue this project; it's really a shame that such a large city as London doesn't have a fitting public library. There should be one at St. Paul's; the west end of that church (if it ever gets finished) would be a great spot for it.
23d February, 1684. I went to Sir John Chardin, who desired my assistance for the engraving the plates, the translation, and printing his History of that wonderful Persian Monument near Persepolis, and other rare antiquities, which he had caused to be drawn from the originals in his second journey into Persia, which we now concluded upon. Afterward, I went with Sir Christopher Wren to Dr. Tenison, where we made the drawing and estimate of the expense of the library, to be begun this next spring near the Mews.
23rd February, 1684. I went to see Sir John Chardin, who asked for my help with engraving the plates, translating, and printing his account of the amazing Persian monument near Persepolis, along with other rare artifacts that he had had illustrated from the originals during his second trip to Persia, which we finalized. After that, I went with Sir Christopher Wren to Dr. Tenison's, where we created the drawing and estimated the costs for the library that is set to begin this next spring near the Mews.
Great expectation of the Prince of Orange's attempts in Holland to bring those of Amsterdam to consent to the new levies, to which we were no friends, by a pseudo-politic adherence to the French interest.
Great anticipation regarding the Prince of Orange's efforts in Holland to persuade the people of Amsterdam to agree to the new taxes, which we opposed, by a false politic alignment with French interests.
26th February, 1684. Came to visit me Dr. Turner, our new Bishop of Rochester.
26th February, 1684. Dr. Turner, our new Bishop of Rochester, came to visit me.
7th March, 1684. Dr. Meggot, Dean of Winchester, preached an incomparable sermon (the King being now gone to Newmarket), on Heb. xii. 15, showing and pathetically pressing the care we ought to have lest we come short of the grace of God. Afterward, I went to visit Dr. Tenison at Kensington, whither he was retired to refresh, after he had been sick of the smallpox.
7th March, 1684. Dr. Meggot, the Dean of Winchester, delivered an amazing sermon (the King being away in Newmarket), on Hebrews 12:15, emphasizing the importance of being mindful so that we don't fall short of God's grace. Afterwards, I went to visit Dr. Tenison at Kensington, where he was recovering after being ill with smallpox.
15th March, 1684. At Whitehall preached Mr. Henry Godolphin, a prebend of St. Paul's, and brother to my dear friend Sydney, on Isaiah 1v. 7. I dined at the Lord Keeper's, and brought him to Sir John Chardin, who showed him his accurate drafts of his travels in Persia.
15th March, 1684. At Whitehall, Mr. Henry Godolphin, a prebend of St. Paul's and brother to my good friend Sydney, preached on Isaiah 1:7. I had lunch at the Lord Keeper's and took him to see Sir John Chardin, who showed him his detailed sketches of his travels in Persia.
28th March, 1684. There was so great a concourse of people with their children to be touched for the Evil, that six or seven were crushed to death by pressing at[Pg 196] the chirurgeon's door for tickets. The weather began to be more mild and tolerable; but there was not the least appearance of any spring.
28th March, 1684. There was such a huge crowd of people with their children waiting to be healed from the Evil that six or seven were crushed to death while trying to get tickets at[Pg 196] the surgeon's door. The weather started to be milder and more bearable; however, there were no signs of spring at all.
30th March, 1684. Easter day. The Bishop of Rochester preached before the King; after which his Majesty, accompanied with three of his natural sons, the Dukes of Northumberland, Richmond, and St. Alban (sons of Portsmouth, Cleveland, and Nelly), went up to the altar; the three boys entering before the King within the rails, at the right hand, and three bishops on the left: London (who officiated), Durham, and Rochester, with the subdean, Dr. Holder. The King, kneeling before the altar, making his offering, the Bishops first received, and then his Majesty; after which he retired to a canopied seat on the right hand. Note, there was perfume burned before the office began. I had received the Sacrament at Whitehall early with the Lords and household, the Bishop of London officiating. Then went to St. Martin's, where Dr. Tenison preached (recovered from the smallpox); then went again to Whitehall as above. In the afternoon, went to St. Martin's again.
30th March, 1684. Easter Sunday. The Bishop of Rochester preached for the King; afterwards, His Majesty, accompanied by three of his legitimate sons, the Dukes of Northumberland, Richmond, and St. Alban (sons of Portsmouth, Cleveland, and Nelly), approached the altar. The three boys entered before the King within the rails, on the right side, while three bishops stood on the left: London (who officiated), Durham, and Rochester, along with the subdean, Dr. Holder. The King, kneeling before the altar and making his offering, was first received by the Bishops, and then by His Majesty; after which he went to a canopied seat on the right side. Note, there was perfume burned before the service began. I had received the Sacrament at Whitehall early with the Lords and household, with the Bishop of London officiating. Then I went to St. Martin's, where Dr. Tenison preached (having recovered from the smallpox); then I went back to Whitehall as mentioned above. In the afternoon, I went to St. Martin's again.
4th April, 1684. I returned home with my family to my house at Sayes Court, after five months' residence in London; hardly the least appearance of any spring.
4th April, 1684. I came back home with my family to our house at Sayes Court, after living in London for five months; there was hardly any sign of spring.
30th April, 1684. A letter of mine to the Royal Society concerning the terrible effects of the past winter being read, they desired it might be printed in the next part of their "Transactions."
30th April, 1684. A letter I wrote to the Royal Society about the severe effects of the past winter was read, and they requested that it be published in the next edition of their "Transactions."
10th May, 1684. I went to visit my brother in Surrey. Called by the way at Ashted, where Sir Robert Howard (Auditor of the Exchequer) entertained me very civilly at his newly-built house, which stands in a park on the Down, the avenue south; though down hill to the house, which is not great, but with the outhouses very convenient. The staircase is painted by Verrio with the story of Astrea; among other figures is the picture of the painter himself, and not unlike him; the rest is well done, only the columns did not at all please me; there is also Sir Robert's own picture in an oval; the whole in fresco. The place has this great defect, that there is no water but what is drawn up by horses from a very deep well.
10th May, 1684. I went to visit my brother in Surrey. I stopped by Ashtead, where Sir Robert Howard (Auditor of the Exchequer) welcomed me warmly at his newly-built house, which is situated in a park on the Downs, with the entrance facing south. It’s downhill to the house, which isn't large, but the outbuildings are quite convenient. The staircase is painted by Verrio with the story of Astraea; among the other figures is a portrait of the painter himself, and it looks quite like him. The rest of the artwork is done well, but I didn’t like the columns at all. There’s also an oval portrait of Sir Robert himself, all done in fresco. The place has one major flaw: there’s no water except what is drawn up by horses from a very deep well.
11th May, 1684. Visited Mr. Higham, who was ill, and died three days after. His grandfather and father[Pg 197] (who christened me), with himself, had now been rectors of this parish 101 years, viz, from May, 1583.
11th May, 1684. I visited Mr. Higham, who was sick, and he passed away three days later. His grandfather and father[Pg 197] (who baptized me), along with him, had now served as rectors of this parish for 101 years, since May, 1583.
12th May, 1684. I returned to London, where I found the Commissioners of the Admiralty abolished, and the office of Admiral restored to the Duke, as to the disposing and ordering all sea business; but his Majesty signed all petitions, papers, warrants, and commissions, that the Duke, not acting as admiral by commission or office, might not incur the penalty of the late Act against Papists and Dissenters holding offices, and refusing the oath and test. Every one was glad of this change, those in the late Commission being utterly ignorant in their duty, to the great damage of the Navy.
12th May, 1684. I returned to London, where I found that the Admiralty Commissioners had been abolished, and the position of Admiral was restored to the Duke, giving him control over all sea affairs. However, the King signed off on all petitions, papers, warrants, and commissions so that the Duke, not acting as Admiral by official appointment, wouldn't face the penalties of the recent law against Catholics and Dissenters holding positions and refusing the oath and test. Everyone was pleased with this change, as those in the former Commission showed complete ignorance in their duties, which seriously harmed the Navy.
The utter ruin of the Low Country was threatened by the siege of Luxemburg, if not timely relieved, and by the obstinacy of the Hollanders, who refused to assist the Prince of Orange, being corrupted by the French.
The complete destruction of the Low Country was at risk because of the siege of Luxembourg, unless it was rescued in time, and because of the stubbornness of the Dutch, who refused to help the Prince of Orange, having been swayed by the French.
16th May, 1684. I received £600 of Sir Charles Bickerstaff for the fee farm of Pilton, in Devon.
16th May, 1684. I received £600 from Sir Charles Bickerstaff for the fee farm of Pilton, in Devon.
26th May, 1684. Lord Dartmouth was chosen Master of the Trinity Company, newly returned with the fleet from blowing up and demolishing Tangier. In the sermon preached on this occasion, Dr. Can observed that, in the 27th chapter of the Acts of the Apostles, the casting anchor out of the fore ship had been caviled at as betraying total ignorance: that it is very true our seamen do not do so; but in the Mediterranean their ships were built differently from ours, and to this day it was the practice to do so there.
26th May, 1684. Lord Dartmouth was elected Master of the Trinity Company, which had just returned from destroying Tangier. In the sermon delivered on this occasion, Dr. Can noted that in the 27th chapter of the Acts of the Apostles, casting anchor from the front of the ship was criticized as a sign of complete ignorance. While it’s true that our sailors don’t do this, the ships in the Mediterranean are constructed differently than ours, and this practice still continues there.
Luxemburg was surrendered to the French, which makes them master of all the Netherlands, gives them entrance into Germany, and a fair game for universal monarchy; which that we should suffer, who only and easily might have hindered, astonished all the world. Thus is the poor Prince of Orange ruined, and this nation and all the Protestant interest in Europe following, unless God in his infinite mercy, as by a miracle, interpose, and our great ones alter their counsels. The French fleet were now besieging Genoa, but after burning much of that beautiful city with their bombs, went off with disgrace.
Luxembourg was given up to the French, making them the rulers of all the Netherlands, giving them access to Germany, and setting the stage for a push towards universal monarchy; that we should allow this, when we could have easily stopped it, is truly shocking. Thus, the poor Prince of Orange is left devastated, and this nation, along with all the Protestant interests in Europe, is at risk, unless God, in His infinite mercy, intervenes like a miracle, and our leaders change their plans. The French fleet was besieging Genoa, but after causing significant damage to that beautiful city with their bombs, they left in disgrace.
11th June, 1684. My cousin, Verney, to whom a very great fortune was fallen, came to take leave of us, going into[Pg 198] the country; a very worthy and virtuous young gentleman.
11th June, 1684. My cousin, Verney, who inherited a huge fortune, came to say goodbye to us before heading into[Pg 198] the country; a truly admirable and good young man.
12th June, 1684. I went to advise and give directions about the building of two streets in Berkeley Garden, reserving the house and as much of the garden as the breadth of the house. In the meantime, I could not but deplore that sweet place (by far the most noble gardens, courts, and accommodations, stately porticos, etc., anywhere about the town) should be so much straitened and turned into tenements. But that magnificent pile and gardens contiguous to it, built by the late Lord Chancellor Clarendon, being all demolished, and designed for piazzas and buildings, was some excuse for my Lady Berkeley's resolution of letting out her ground also for so excessive a price as was offered, advancing near £1,000 per annum in mere ground rents; to such a mad intemperance was the age come of building about a city, by far too disproportionate already to the nation:53 I having in my time seen it almost as large again as it was within my memory.
12th June, 1684. I went to give advice and guidance about the construction of two streets in Berkeley Garden, keeping the house and as much of the garden as the width of the house. In the meantime, I couldn’t help but lament that such a beautiful place (by far the most impressive gardens, courtyards, and facilities, grand porticos, etc., anywhere in town) should be so limited and turned into rental properties. But with the grand estate and gardens next to it, built by the late Lord Chancellor Clarendon, all demolished and planned for piazzas and buildings, it provided some justification for Lady Berkeley's decision to lease out her land at such an excessive price as was offered, nearing £1,000 a year in pure ground rents; the madness of the time had led to a building frenzy around a city that was already far too disproportionate to the nation: 53 I had seen it almost double in size compared to what I remember.
22d June, 1684. Last Friday, Sir Thomas Armstrong was executed at Tyburn for treason, without trial, having been outlawed and apprehended in Holland, on the conspiracy of the Duke of Monmouth, Lord Russell, etc., which gave occasion of discourse to people and lawyers, in regard it was on an outlawry that judgment was given and execution.54
22nd June, 1684. Last Friday, Sir Thomas Armstrong was executed at Tyburn for treason, without a trial, having been declared an outlaw and captured in Holland, based on the conspiracy involving the Duke of Monmouth, Lord Russell, and others. This led to discussions among people and lawyers, since the judgment and execution were based on an outlawry.54
2d July, 1684. I went to the Observatory at Greenwich, where Mr. Flamsted took his observations of the eclipse of the sun, now almost three parts obscured.
2d July, 1684. I went to the Observatory at Greenwich, where Mr. Flamstead took his observations of the eclipse of the sun, now nearly three-quarters obscured.
There had been an excessively hot and dry spring, and such a drought still continued as never was in my memory.
There had been an unusually hot and dry spring, and the drought was still going on, something I had never experienced before.
13th July, 1684. Some small sprinkling of rain; the leaves dropping from the trees as in autumn.[Pg 199]
13th July, 1684. A light drizzle; the leaves are falling from the trees like it’s autumn.[Pg 199]
25th July, 1684. I dined at Lord Falkland's, Treasurer of the Navy, where after dinner we had rare music, there being among others, Signor Pietro Reggio, and Signor John Baptist, both famous, one for his voice, the other for playing on the harpsichord, few if any in Europe exceeding him. There was also a Frenchman who sung an admirable bass.
25th July, 1684. I had dinner at Lord Falkland's, the Treasurer of the Navy, where after dinner we enjoyed some amazing music. Among the performers were Signor Pietro Reggio and Signor John Baptist, both renowned—one for his voice and the other for his exceptional harpsichord skills, with few, if any, in Europe surpassing him. There was also a Frenchman who sang an impressive bass.
26th July, 1684. I returned home, where I found my Lord Chief Justice [Jefferies], the Countess of Clarendon, and Lady Catherine Fitzgerald, who dined with me.
26th July, 1684. I returned home, where I found my Lord Chief Justice [Jefferies], the Countess of Clarendon, and Lady Catherine Fitzgerald, who had dinner with me.
10th August, 1684. We had now rain after such a drought as no man in England had known.
10th August, 1684. We finally got rain after a drought that no one in England had ever experienced.
24th August, 1684. Excessively hot. We had not had above one or two considerable showers, and those storms, these eight or nine months. Many trees died for the want of refreshment.
24th August, 1684. Extremely hot. We haven't had more than one or two significant rainstorms in the past eight or nine months. Many trees have died from lack of water.
31st August, 1684. Mr. Sidney Godolphin was made Baron Godolphin.
31st August, 1684. Mr. Sidney Godolphin was appointed Baron Godolphin.
26th September, 1684. The King being returned from Winchester, there was a numerous Court at Whitehall.
26th September, 1684. The King returned from Winchester, and there was a large crowd at Whitehall.
At this time the Earl of Rochester was removed from the Treasury to the Presidentship of the Council; Lord Godolphin was made first Commissioner of the Treasury in his place, Lord Middleton (a Scot) made Secretary of State, in the room of Lord Godolphin. These alterations being very unexpected and mysterious, gave great occasion of discourse.
At this time, the Earl of Rochester was moved from the Treasury to the President of the Council; Lord Godolphin was appointed as the first Commissioner of the Treasury to take his place, and Lord Middleton (a Scot) was made Secretary of State instead of Lord Godolphin. These changes were very surprising and unclear, leading to plenty of discussion.
There was now an Ambassador from the King of Siam, in the East Indies, to his Majesty.
There was now an ambassador from the King of Siam in the East Indies, to his Majesty.
22d October, 1684. I went with Sir William Godolphin to see the rhinoceros, or unicorn, being the first that I suppose was ever brought into England. She belonged to some East India merchants, and was sold (as I remember) for above £2,000. At the same time, I went to see a crocodile, brought from some of the West India Islands, resembling the Egyptian crocodile.
22nd October, 1684. I went with Sir William Godolphin to see the rhinoceros, or unicorn, which I believe is the first one ever brought to England. It belonged to some East India merchants and was sold (if I recall correctly) for over £2,000. At the same time, I also went to see a crocodile that was brought from some of the West Indian Islands, looking like the Egyptian crocodile.
24th October, 1684. I dined at Sir Stephen Fox's with the Duke of Northumberland. He seemed to be a young gentleman of good capacity, well bred, civil and modest: newly come from travel, and had made his campaign at the siege of Luxemburg. Of all his Majesty's children (of which he had now six Dukes) this seemed the most accomplished and worth the owning. He is extraordi[Pg 200]narily handsome and well shaped. What the Dukes of Richmond and St. Alban's will prove, their youth does not yet discover; they are very pretty boys.
24th October, 1684. I had dinner at Sir Stephen Fox's with the Duke of Northumberland. He appeared to be a young man of great ability, well-mannered, polite, and humble; he had just returned from traveling and had fought in the siege of Luxembourg. Of all the King’s children (there were now six Dukes), he seemed the most accomplished and worthy of recognition. He is exceptionally handsome and well-built. We can't yet tell what the Dukes of Richmond and St. Alban's will become; they are very charming young boys.
26th October, 1684. Dr. Goodman preached before the King on James ii. 12, concerning the law of liberty: an excellent discourse and in good method. He is author of "The Prodigal Son," a treatise worth reading, and another of the old religion.
26th October, 1684. Dr. Goodman gave a sermon before the King on James ii. 12, about the law of liberty: an excellent talk and well-organized. He is the author of "The Prodigal Son," a treatise worth reading, and another about the old religion.
27th October, 1684. I visited the Lord Chamberlain, where dined the black Baron and Monsieur Flamerin, who had so long been banished from France for a duel.
27th October, 1684. I went to the Lord Chamberlain’s, where I had dinner with the Black Baron and Monsieur Flamerin, who had been exiled from France for a duel for quite some time.
28th October, 1684. I carried Lord Clarendon through the city amid all the squibs and bacchanalia of the Lord Mayor's show, to the Royal Society, where he was proposed a member; and then treated him at dinner.
28th October, 1684. I escorted Lord Clarendon through the city amidst all the fireworks and festivities of the Lord Mayor's show, to the Royal Society, where he was nominated as a member; and then took him out for dinner.
I went to St. Clement's, that prettily built and contrived church where a young divine gave us an eloquent sermon on 1 Cor. vi. 20, inciting to gratitude and glorifying God for the fabric of our bodies and the dignity of our nature.
I went to St. Clement's, a beautifully designed church where a young pastor delivered an inspiring sermon on 1 Cor. vi. 20, encouraging us to be thankful and to honor God for the creation of our bodies and the value of our humanity.
2d November, 1684. A sudden change from temperate warm weather to an excessive cold rain, frost, snow, and storm, such as had seldom been known. This winter weather began as early and fierce as the past did late; till about Christmas there then had been hardly any winter.
2nd November, 1684. A sudden shift from mild, warm weather to an intense cold rain, frost, snow, and storms, conditions that had rarely been experienced. This winter weather started as early and severe as the previous winter did late; up until around Christmas, there had been hardly any winter at all.
4th November, 1684. Dr. Turner, now translated from Rochester to Ely upon the death of Dr. Peter Gunning, preached before the King at Whitehall on Romans iii. 8, a very excellent sermon, vindicating the Church of England against the pernicious doctrines of the Church of Rome. He challenged the producing but of five clergymen who forsook our Church and went over to that of Rome, during all the troubles and rebellion in England, which lasted near twenty years; and this was to my certain observation a great truth.
4th November, 1684. Dr. Turner, having moved from Rochester to Ely after the death of Dr. Peter Gunning, preached before the King at Whitehall on Romans 3:8. It was an outstanding sermon defending the Church of England against the harmful doctrines of the Church of Rome. He asked for just five clergymen who left our Church to join that of Rome during the nearly twenty years of turmoil and rebellion in England, which, in my honest observation, was a significant truth.
15th November, 1684. Being the Queen's birthday, there were fireworks on the Thames before Whitehall, with pageants of castles, forts, and other devices of girandolas, serpents, the King and Queen's arms and mottoes, all represented in fire, such as had not been seen here. But the most remarkable was the several fires and skirmishes in the very water, which actually moved a[Pg 201] long way, burning under the water, now and then appearing above it, giving reports like muskets and cannon, with grenades and innumerable other devices. It is said it cost £1,500. It was concluded with a ball, where all the young ladies and gallants danced in the great hall. The court had not been seen so brave and rich in apparel since his Majesty's Restoration.
15th November, 1684. Since it was the Queen's birthday, there were fireworks on the Thames in front of Whitehall, featuring displays of castles, forts, and other fiery devices like girandolas and serpents, along with the King and Queen's emblems and mottos, all showcased in flames that had never been seen here before. But the most impressive part was the various fires and skirmishes in the water, which actually moved a[Pg 201] long distance, burning beneath the surface and occasionally surfacing, creating loud noises like muskets and cannons, with grenades and countless other effects. It is reported to have cost £1,500. The event concluded with a ball, where all the young ladies and gentlemen danced in the grand hall. The court hadn’t looked so splendid and richly dressed since his Majesty's Restoration.
30th November, 1684. In the morning, Dr. Fiennes, son of the Lord Say and Seale, preached before the King on Joshua xxi. 11.
30th November, 1684. In the morning, Dr. Fiennes, son of Lord Say and Seale, preached before the King on Joshua 21:11.
3d December, 1684. I carried Mr. Justell and Mr. Slingsby (Master of the Mint), to see Mr. Sheldon's collection of medals. The series of Popes was rare, and so were several among the moderns, especially that of John Huss's martyrdom at Constance; of the Roman Emperors, Consulars some Greek, etc., in copper, gold, and silver; not many truly antique; a medallion of Otho Paulus Æmilius, etc., ancient. They were held at a price of £1,000; but not worth, I judge, above £200.
3rd December, 1684. I took Mr. Justell and Mr. Slingsby (Master of the Mint) to check out Mr. Sheldon’s collection of medals. The series of Popes was rare, as were several of the modern ones, especially the one commemorating John Huss's martyrdom at Constance; there were also medals of Roman Emperors, Consulars, some Greek ones, etc., made of copper, gold, and silver; not many were truly antique; there was a medallion of Otho Paulus Æmilius, etc., which was ancient. They were priced at £1,000; however, I don't think they are worth more than £200.
7th December, 1684. I went to see the new church at St. James's, elegantly built; the altar was especially adorned, the white marble inclosure curiously and richly carved, the flowers and garlands about the walls by Mr. Gibbons, in wood: a pelican with her young at her breast; just over the altar in the carved compartment and border environing the purple velvet fringed with I. H. S. richly embroidered, and most noble plate, were given by Sir R. Geere, to the value (as was said) of £200. There was no altar anywhere in England, nor has there been any abroad, more handsomely adorned.
7th December, 1684. I went to see the new church at St. James's, which was beautifully built; the altar was particularly decorated, the white marble enclosure intricately and lavishly carved, the flowers and garlands on the walls done by Mr. Gibbons in wood: a pelican with her chicks at her breast, right above the altar in the carved section and border surrounding the purple velvet trimmed with I. H. S., richly embroidered, and the magnificent plate, which was donated by Sir R. Geere, said to be worth £200. There was no altar anywhere in England, nor has there been abroad, that was more elegantly decorated.
17th December, 1684. Early in the morning I went into St. James's Park to see three Turkish, or Asian horses, newly brought over, and now first shown to his Majesty. There were four, but one of them died at sea, being three weeks coming from Hamburg. They were taken from a Bashaw at the siege of Vienna, at the late famous raising that leaguer. I never beheld so delicate a creature as one of them was, of somewhat a bright bay, two white feet, a blaze; such a head, eyes, ears, neck, breast, belly, haunches, legs, pasterns, and feet, in all regards, beautiful, and proportioned to admiration; spirited, proud, nimble, making halt, turning[Pg 202] with that swiftness, and in so small a compass, as was admirable. With all this so gentle and tractable as called to mind what I remember Busbequius, speaks of them, to the reproach of our grooms in Europe, who bring up their horses so churlishly, as makes most of them retain their ill habits. They trotted like does, as if they did not feel the ground. Five hundred guineas was demanded for the first; 300 for the second; and 200 for the third, which was brown. All of them were choicely shaped, but the two last not altogether so perfect as the first.
17th December, 1684. Early in the morning, I went into St. James's Park to see three Turkish or Asian horses that had just arrived and were being shown to His Majesty for the first time. There were four, but one died at sea during the three-week journey from Hamburg. They were captured from a Bashaw during the siege of Vienna, at that famous recent raising of the siege. I had never seen such a delicate creature as one of them, a bright bay with two white feet and a blaze; it had such a beautiful head, eyes, ears, neck, chest, belly, haunches, legs, pasterns, and feet, all perfectly proportioned. It was spirited, proud, and nimble, able to halt and turn with such swiftness in such a small space that it was truly impressive. Despite all this, it was so gentle and manageable that it reminded me of what Busbequius said about them, criticizing our European grooms who train horses so harshly that most retain bad habits. They trotted like deer, as if they were floating above the ground. The asking price was five hundred guineas for the first, three hundred for the second, and two hundred for the third, which was brown. All of them were beautifully shaped, but the last two weren't quite as perfect as the first.
It was judged by the spectators, among whom was the King, Prince of Denmark, Duke of York, and several of the Court, noble persons skilled in horses, especially Monsieur Faubert and his son (provost masters of the Academy, and esteemed of the best in Europe), that there were never seen any horses in these parts to be compared with them. Add to all this, the furniture consisting of embroidery on the saddle, housings, quiver, bow, arrows, scymitar, sword, mace, or battle-ax, à la Turcisq; the Bashaw's velvet mantle furred with the most perfect ermine I ever beheld; all which, ironwork in common furniture being here of silver, curiously wrought and double gilt to an incredible value. Such and so extraordinary was the embroidery, that I never saw anything approaching it. The reins and headstall were of crimson silk, covered with chains of silver gilt. There was also a Turkish royal standard of a horse's tail, together with all sorts of other caparisons belonging to a general's horse, by which one may estimate how gallantly and magnificently those infidels appear in the field; for nothing could be seen more glorious. The gentleman (a German) who rode the horse, was in all this garb. They were shod with iron made round and closed at the heel, with a hole in the middle about as wide as a shilling. The hoofs most entire.
It was judged by the spectators, including the King, Prince of Denmark, Duke of York, and several members of the Court—noble individuals skilled in horses, particularly Monsieur Faubert and his son (who were master trainers at the Academy and regarded as the best in Europe)—that no horses had ever been seen in these parts that could compare to them. In addition to this, the equipment featured embroidery on the saddle, housings, quiver, bow, arrows, scimitar, sword, mace, or battle-ax, à la Turcisq; the Bashaw's velvet mantle furred with the most exquisite ermine I had ever seen; all of which had silver ironwork for the common furniture, intricately crafted and double-gilded to an astonishing value. Such was the embroidery that I had never encountered anything like it before. The reins and headstall were made of crimson silk, adorned with chains of gilded silver. There was also a Turkish royal standard made from a horse's tail, along with various other accessories belonging to a general's horse, which showcased how impressively and magnificently those infidels present themselves in battle; nothing could be more glorious. The gentleman (a German) riding the horse was dressed in all this gear. The horses had iron shoes that were rounded and closed at the heel, with a hole in the center about as wide as a shilling. The hooves were in perfect condition.
18th December, 1684. I went with Lord Cornwallis to see the young gallants do their exercise. Mr. Faubert having newly railed in a manage, and fitted it for the academy. There were the Dukes of Norfolk and Northumberland, Lord Newburgh, and a nephew of (Duras) Earl of Feversham. The exercises were, 1, running at the ring; 2, flinging a javelin at a Moor's head; 3, dis[Pg 203]charging a pistol at a mark; lastly taking up a gauntlet with the point of a sword; all these performed in full speed. The Duke of Northumberland hardly missed of succeeding in every one, a dozen times, as I think. The Duke of Norfolk did exceeding bravely. Lords Newburgh and Duras seemed nothing so dexterous. Here I saw the difference of what the French call "bel homme à cheval," and "bon homme à cheval"; the Duke of Norfolk being the first, that is rather a fine person on a horse, the Duke of Northumberland being both in perfection, namely, a graceful person and an excellent rider. But the Duke of Norfolk told me he had not been at this exercise these twelve years before. There were in the field the Prince of Denmark, and the Lord Lansdowne, son of the Earl of Bath, who had been made a Count of the Empire last summer for his service before Vienna.
18th December, 1684. I went with Lord Cornwallis to watch the young gallants practice. Mr. Faubert had just completed a new riding arena, setting it up for the academy. There were the Dukes of Norfolk and Northumberland, Lord Newburgh, and a nephew of (Duras) Earl of Feversham. The exercises included: 1. running at the ring; 2. throwing a javelin at a Moor's head; 3. firing a pistol at a target; and finally, picking up a gauntlet with the tip of a sword. All of these were done at full speed. The Duke of Northumberland almost succeeded at every one, a dozen times, I think. The Duke of Norfolk performed exceptionally well. Lords Newburgh and Duras didn't seem as skilled. Here I noticed the difference between what the French call "bel homme à cheval" and "bon homme à cheval"; the Duke of Norfolk being the former, a rather fine person on a horse, while the Duke of Northumberland exemplified both perfectly, being both graceful and an excellent rider. However, the Duke of Norfolk mentioned he hadn't practiced this exercise in the past twelve years. In the field were the Prince of Denmark and Lord Lansdowne, son of the Earl of Bath, who had been made a Count of the Empire last summer for his service before Vienna.
20th December, 1684. A villainous murder was perpetrated by Mr. St. John, eldest son to Sir Walter St. John, a worthy gentleman, on a knight of quality, in a tavern. The offender was sentenced and reprieved. So many horrid murders and duels were committed about this time as were never before heard of in England; which gave much cause of complaint and murmurings.
20th December, 1684. A heinous murder was committed by Mr. St. John, the eldest son of Sir Walter St. John, a respectable gentleman, against a knight of high standing, in a tavern. The perpetrator was sentenced but then pardoned. Numerous dreadful murders and duels occurred during this period, unlike anything previously seen in England, leading to significant complaints and unrest.
1st January, 1684-85. It proved so sharp weather, and so long and cruel a frost, that the Thames was frozen across, but the frost was often dissolved, and then froze again.
1st January, 1684-85. The weather was extremely cold, and the frost lasted so long and fiercely that the Thames froze solid, although the ice would sometimes melt and then freeze again.
11th January, 1685. A young man preached upon St. Luke xiii. 5, after the Presbyterian tedious method and repetition.
11th January, 1685. A young man preached on St. Luke 13:5, using the long-winded and repetitive style typical of the Presbyterians.
24th January, 1685. I dined at Lord Newport's, who had some excellent pictures, especially that of Sir Thomas Hanmer, by Vandyke, one of the best he ever painted; another of our English Dobson's painting; but, above all, Christ in the Virgin's lap, by Poussin, an admirable piece; with something of most other famous hands.
24th January, 1685. I had dinner at Lord Newport's, who had some amazing paintings, especially one of Sir Thomas Hanmer by Vandyke, which is one of the best he ever created; another painting by our English Dobson; but above all, there was a stunning piece of Christ in the Virgin's lap by Poussin, an incredible work; along with something from most other renowned artists.
25th January, 1685. Dr. Dove preached before the King. I saw this evening such a scene of profuse gaming, and the King in the midst of his three concubines, as I have never before seen—luxurious dallying and profaneness.
25th January, 1685. Dr. Dove preached before the King. I saw a scene of excessive gambling this evening, with the King surrounded by his three mistresses, unlike anything I’ve seen before—outrageous indulgence and disrespect.
27th January, 1685. I dined at Lord Sunderland's, being invited to hear that celebrated voice of Mr. Pordage, newly come from Rome; his singing was after the Vene[Pg 204]tian recitative, as masterly as could be, and with an excellent voice both treble and bass; Dr. Walgrave accompanied it with his THEORBO LUTE, on which he performed beyond imagination, and is doubtless one of the greatest masters in Europe on that charming instrument. Pordage is a priest, as Mr. Bernard Howard told me in private.
27th January, 1685. I had dinner at Lord Sunderland's, where I was invited to hear the famous voice of Mr. Pordage, who had just returned from Rome; his singing was in the Venetian style, absolutely masterful, and he had a fantastic voice that could do both treble and bass. Dr. Walgrave accompanied him on his THEORBO LUTE, playing in a way that was beyond imagination, and he is definitely one of the greatest masters in Europe on that beautiful instrument. Pordage is a priest, as Mr. Bernard Howard mentioned to me in private.
There was in the room where we dined, and in his bedchamber, those incomparable pieces of Columbus, a Flagellation, the Grammar school, the Venus and Adonis of Titian; and of Vandyke's that picture of the late Earl of Digby (father of the Countess of Sunderland), and Earl of Bedford, Sir Kenelm Digby, and two ladies of incomparable performance; besides that of Moses and the burning bush of Bassano, and several other pieces of the best masters. A marble head of M. Brutus, etc.
There were in the room where we dined, and in his bedroom, those incredible pieces by Columbus, a Flagellation, the Grammar School, and the Venus and Adonis by Titian; and by Vandyke, that painting of the late Earl of Digby (the father of the Countess of Sunderland) and Earl of Bedford, Sir Kenelm Digby, along with two ladies of exceptional artistry; besides the one of Moses and the burning bush by Bassano, and several other works by the greatest masters. A marble head of M. Brutus, etc.
28th January, 1685. I was invited to my Lord Arundel's, of Wardour (now newly released of his six years' confinement in the Tower on suspicion of the plot called Oates's Plot), where after dinner the same Mr. Pordage entertained us with his voice, that excellent and stupendous artist, Signor John Baptist, playing to it on the harpsichord. My daughter Mary being with us, she also sang to the great satisfaction of both the masters, and a world of people of quality present.
28th January, 1685. I was invited to Lord Arundel's place in Wardour (who has just been released after six years in the Tower due to suspicions from what's known as Oates's Plot), where, after dinner, Mr. Pordage entertained us with his singing, while the incredible artist, Signor John Baptist, played the harpsichord. My daughter Mary was with us, and she also sang, bringing great joy to both of the masters and a crowd of nobility present.
She did so also at my Lord Rochester's the evening following, where we had the French boy so famed for his singing, and indeed he had a delicate voice, and had been well taught. I also heard Mrs. Packer (daughter to my old friend) sing before his Majesty and the Duke, privately, that stupendous bass, Gosling, accompanying her, but hers was so loud as took away much of the sweetness. Certainly never woman had a stronger or better ear, could she possibly have governed it. She would do rarely in a large church among the nuns.
She did the same at Lord Rochester's the following evening, where we had the French boy famous for his singing, and he indeed had a beautiful voice and had been well trained. I also heard Mrs. Packer (the daughter of my old friend) sing privately before His Majesty and the Duke, with that incredible bass, Gosling, accompanying her, but her singing was so loud that it overshadowed much of the sweetness. Certainly, no woman had a stronger or better ear, if only she could have controlled it. She would shine in a large church among the nuns.
4th February, 1685. I went to London, hearing his Majesty had been the Monday before (2d February) surprised in his bedchamber with an apoplectic fit, so that if, by God's providence, Dr. King (that excellent chirurgeon as well as physician) had not been accidentally present to let him bleed (having his lancet in his pocket), his Majesty had certainly died that moment; which might have been of direful consequence, there being nobody else[Pg 205] present with the King save this Doctor and one more, as I am assured. It was a mark of the extraordinary dexterity, resolution, and presence of mind in the Doctor, to let him bleed in the very paroxysm, without staying the coming of other physicians, which regularly should have been done, and for want of which he must have a regular pardon, as they tell me. This rescued his Majesty for the instant, but it was only a short reprieve. He still complained, and was relapsing, often fainting, with sometimes epileptic symptoms, till Wednesday, for which he was cupped, let bleed in both jugulars, and both vomit and purges, which so relieved him, that on Thursday hopes of recovery were signified in the public "Gazette," but that day about noon, the physicians thought him feverish. This they seemed glad of, as being more easily allayed and methodically dealt with than his former fits; so as they prescribed the famous Jesuit's powder; but it made him worse, and some very able doctors who were present did not think it a fever, but the effect of his frequent bleeding and other sharp operations used by them about his head, so that probably the powder might stop the circulation, and renew his former fits, which now made him very weak. Thus he passed Thursday night with great difficulty, when complaining of a pain in his side, they drew twelve ounces more of blood from him; this was by six in the morning on Friday, and it gave him relief, but it did not continue, for being now in much pain, and struggling for breath, he lay dozing, and, after some conflicts, the physicians despairing of him, he gave up the ghost at half an hour after eleven in the morning, being the sixth of February, 1685, in the 36th year of his reign, and 54th of his age.
4th February, 1685. I went to London after hearing that his Majesty had been caught off guard in his bedroom by an apoplectic fit the previous Monday (2nd February). If it weren't for Dr. King, that excellent surgeon and physician, who happened to be there and had his lancet in his pocket to let him bleed, the King would certainly have died right then. This could have led to disastrous consequences, as the only people present were Dr. King and one other person, as I've been told. The Doctor showed remarkable skill, courage, and quick thinking by bleeding him during the fit, without waiting for other physicians, which typically should have been done, and for which he might need a formal pardon, I've heard. This act saved the King's life temporarily, but it was just a brief stay of execution. He continued to complain and showed signs of relapse, frequently fainting, and even exhibiting some epileptic symptoms, until Wednesday. He was cupped, bled from both jugulars, and given both vomits and purges, which helped him enough that by Thursday there were signs of recovery mentioned in the public "Gazette." However, around noon that day, the physicians found him feverish. They seemed pleased, thinking it would be easier to treat than his previous fits, so they prescribed the famous Jesuit's powder. But it made him worse, and some very skilled doctors present believed it wasn't a fever but rather the result of his frequent bleeding and other intense treatments on his head. They suggested that the powder might stop his circulation and bring back his earlier fits, which had now left him very weak. He endured Thursday night with great difficulty. When he complained of pain in his side, they drew another twelve ounces of blood from him; this was done by six in the morning on Friday, and it brought him some relief, but it didn’t last. Now in significant pain and struggling to breathe, he was dozing off, and after some struggles, the physicians, losing hope, he passed away at half past eleven in the morning on the sixth of February, 1685, in the 36th year of his reign and at the age of 54.
Prayers were solemnly made in all the churches, especially in both the Court Chapels, where the chaplains relieved one another every half quarter of an hour from the time he began to be in danger till he expired, according to the form prescribed in the Church offices. Those who assisted his Majesty's devotions were, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishops of London, Durham, and Ely, but more especially Dr. Ken, the Bishop of Bath and Wells.55 It is said they exceedingly urged[Pg 206] the receiving Holy Sacrament, but his Majesty told them he would consider of it, which he did so long till it was too late. Others whispered that the Bishops and Lords, except the Earls of Bath and Feversham, being ordered to withdraw the night before, Huddleston, the priest, had presumed to administer the Popish offices. He gave his breeches and keys to the Duke who was almost continually kneeling by his bedside, and in tears. He also recommended to him the care of his natural children, all except the Duke of Monmouth, now in Holland, and in his displeasure. He entreated the Queen to pardon him (not without cause); who a little before had sent a Bishop to excuse her not more frequently visiting him, in regard of her excessive grief, and withal that his Majesty would forgive it if at any time she had offended him. He spoke to the Duke to be kind to the Duchess of Cleveland, and especially Portsmouth, and that Nelly might not starve.
Prayers were solemnly offered in all the churches, especially in both Court Chapels, where the chaplains took turns every fifteen minutes from the time he started to be in danger until he passed away, following the rituals outlined in the Church services. Assisting the King in his devotions were the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishops of London, Durham, and Ely, but notably Dr. Ken, the Bishop of Bath and Wells. It is said they strongly encouraged him to receive the Holy Sacrament, but he told them he would think about it, which he did until it was too late. Others quietly suggested that the Bishops and Lords, except the Earls of Bath and Feversham, had been asked to leave the night before, and that Father Huddleston had taken it upon himself to perform the Catholic rites. He gave his pants and keys to the Duke, who was almost always kneeling by his bedside, in tears. He also entrusted him with the care of his legitimate children, all except the Duke of Monmouth, who was in Holland and currently in his bad graces. He asked the Queen to forgive him (not without reason); she had recently sent a Bishop to explain why she had not been visiting him more often, due to her deep sorrow, and to request that the King would excuse her if she had ever upset him. He spoke to the Duke about being kind to the Duchess of Cleveland, and especially to Portsmouth, and that Nelly should not be left in poverty.
Thus died King Charles II., of a vigorous and robust constitution, and in all appearance promising a long life. He was a prince of many virtues, and many great imper[Pg 207]fections; debonair, easy of access, not bloody nor cruel; his countenance fierce, his voice great, proper of person, every motion became him; a lover of the sea, and skillful in shipping; not affecting other studies, yet he had a laboratory, and knew of many empirical medicines, and the easier mechanical mathematics; he loved planting and building, and brought in a politer way of living, which passed to luxury and intolerable expense. He had a particular talent in telling a story, and facetious passages, of which he had innumerable; this made some buffoons and vicious wretches too presumptuous and familiar, not worthy the favor they abused. He took delight in having a number of little spaniels follow him and lie in his bedchamber, where he often suffered the bitches to puppy and give suck, which rendered it very offensive, and indeed made the whole court nasty and stinking. He would doubtless have been an excellent prince, had he been less addicted to women, who made him uneasy, and always in want to supply their immeasurable profusion, to the detriment of many indigent persons who had signally served both him and his father. He frequently and easily changed favorites to his great prejudice.
Thus died King Charles II, a man with a strong and healthy constitution, seemingly destined for a long life. He was a prince with many virtues and significant flaws; charming, approachable, not violent or cruel; his expression intense, his voice loud, well-built, and every movement suited him. He loved the sea and was skilled in navigation; he didn’t pursue many other studies, but he had a laboratory and was knowledgeable about various practical medicines and basic mechanical mathematics. He enjoyed planting and construction, introducing a more refined lifestyle that eventually led to luxury and excessive spending. He had a special knack for storytelling and witty anecdotes, of which he had countless, making some jesters and immoral individuals too bold and familiar, not deserving of the favor they took for granted. He loved having a pack of little spaniels follow him and sleep in his bedroom, where he often allowed the females to give birth and nurse, making the place quite unpleasant and the entire court dirty and foul-smelling. He would have undoubtedly made a great king if not for his overwhelming attraction to women, which troubled him and kept him constantly needing to fund their insatiable demands, to the detriment of many needy individuals who had served both him and his father with distinction. He frequently and easily changed favorites, to his own great disadvantage.
As to other public transactions, and unhappy miscarriages, 'tis not here I intend to number them; but certainly never had King more glorious opportunities to have made himself, his people, and all Europe happy, and prevented innumerable mischiefs, had not his too easy nature resigned him to be managed by crafty men, and some abandoned and profane wretches who corrupted his otherwise sufficient parts, disciplined as he had been by many afflictions during his banishment, which gave him much experience and knowledge of men and things; but those wicked creatures took him from off all application becoming so great a King. The history of his reign will certainly be the most wonderful for the variety of matter and accidents, above any extant in former ages: the sad tragical death of his father, his banishment and hardships, his miraculous restoration, conspiracies against him, parliaments, wars, plagues, fires, comets, revolutions abroad happening in his time, with a thousand other particulars. He was ever kind to me, and very gracious upon all occasions, and therefore I cannot without ingrati[Pg 208]tude but deplore his loss, which for many respects, as well as duty, I do with all my soul.
As for other public events and unfortunate failures, I don't intend to list them here; but it's clear that no king has had more glorious opportunities to make himself, his people, and all of Europe happy, and to prevent countless disasters, had he not been too trusting and allowed himself to be influenced by cunning individuals and some wicked and irreverent people who tainted his otherwise capable nature. He had been shaped by many hardships during his exile, which provided him with plenty of experience and insight into people and situations; however, those malicious individuals distracted him from performing the duties befitting a great king. The history of his reign will undoubtedly be the most remarkable for its variety of events and circumstances, surpassing anything from earlier times: the tragic and sorrowful death of his father, his exile and struggles, his miraculous return, conspiracies against him, parliaments, wars, plagues, fires, comets, and revolutions happening abroad during his time, along with countless other details. He was always kind to me and very gracious on all occasions, so I cannot help but feel deep sorrow for his loss, which I do with all my heart for many reasons, as well as out of duty.
His Majesty being dead, the Duke, now King James II., went immediately to Council, and before entering into any business, passionately declaring his sorrow, told their Lordships, that since the succession had fallen to him, he would endeavor to follow the example of his predecessor in his clemency and tenderness to his people; that, however he had been misrepresented as affecting arbitrary power, they should find the contrary; for that the laws of England had made the King as great a monarch as he could desire; that he would endeavor to maintain the Government both in Church and State, as by law established, its principles being so firm for monarchy, and the members of it showing themselves so good and loyal subjects;56 and that, as he would never depart from the just rights and prerogatives of the Crown, so he would never invade any man's property; but as he had often adventured his life in defense of the nation, so he would still proceed, and preserve it in all its lawful rights and liberties.
With His Majesty deceased, the Duke, now King James II, went straight to Council and, before discussing any matters, expressed his deep sorrow. He told their Lordships that since the succession had come to him, he would strive to emulate his predecessor's compassion and care for the people. He asserted that, despite being misrepresented as wanting absolute power, they would see the opposite; the laws of England had granted him as much authority as he could desire. He would aim to uphold the Government in both Church and State as established by law, as its principles supported monarchy, and its members had proven to be good and loyal subjects; and that he would never stray from the legitimate rights and privileges of the Crown, nor would he infringe on anyone's property. He emphasized that just as he had often risked his life for the nation, he would continue to do so and protect all its lawful rights and freedoms.
This being the substance of what he said, the Lords desired it might be published, as containing matter of great satisfaction to a jealous people upon this change, which his Majesty consented to. Then were the Council sworn, and a Proclamation ordered to be published that all officers should continue in their stations, that there might be no failure of public justice, till his further pleasure should be known. Then the King rose, the Lords accompanying him to his bedchamber, where, while he reposed himself, tired indeed as he was with grief and watching, they returned again into the Council chamber to take order for the PROCLAIMING his Majesty, which (after some debate) they consented should be in the very form his grandfather, King James I., was, after the death of Queen Elizabeth; as likewise that the Lords, etc., should proceed in their coaches through the city for the more solemnity of it. Upon this was I, and several other gentlemen waiting in the Privy gallery, admitted into the Council chamber to be witness of what was resolved on. Thence with the Lords, Lord Marshal and Heralds, and other Crown officers being ready, we first went to Whitehall gate, where the Lords stood on foot bareheaded, while the Herald proclaimed his Majesty's title to the Imperial Crown and succession according to the form, the trumpets and kettledrums having first sounded three times, which ended with the people's acclamations. Then a herald called the Lords' coaches according to rank, myself accompanying the solemnity in my Lord Cornwallis's coach, first to Temple Bar, where the Lord Mayor and his brethren met us on horseback, in all their formalities, and proclaimed the King; hence to the Exchange in Cornhill, and so we returned in the[Pg 210] order we set forth. Being come to Whitehall, we all went and kissed the King and Queen's hands. He had been on the bed, but was now risen and in his undress. The Queen was in bed in her apartment, but put forth her hand, seeming to be much afflicted, as I believe she was, having deported herself so decently upon all occasions since she came into England, which made her universally beloved.
This is what he said, and the Lords wanted it published because it would reassure a concerned public about this change, which the King agreed to. Then the Council members were sworn in, and a Proclamation was ordered to be issued stating that all officers would keep their positions to ensure public justice continued until the King decided otherwise. After that, the King stood up, and the Lords accompanied him to his bedroom. While he rested, exhausted from grief and lack of sleep, they returned to the Council chamber to organize the ANNOUNCING of his Majesty. After some discussion, they agreed it should be conducted in the same way King James I was proclaimed after Queen Elizabeth's death, and that the Lords would ride through the city in their coaches for added solemnity. I, along with several other gentlemen waiting in the Privy gallery, was then allowed into the Council chamber to witness the decisions being made. Together with the Lords, Lord Marshal, Heralds, and other Crown officers, we first went to Whitehall gate, where the Lords stood on foot, bareheaded, while the Herald proclaimed the King's title to the Imperial Crown and succession. This was accompanied by three trumpet and kettledrum sounds, which ended with cheers from the crowd. Then a herald called for the Lords' coaches in order of rank, and I joined the procession in Lord Cornwallis's coach, first heading to Temple Bar, where the Lord Mayor and his fellow officials met us on horseback, dressed formally, and proclaimed the King. From there, we went to the Exchange in Cornhill, and then returned in the[Pg 210] same order we had set out. Upon arriving at Whitehall, we all went and kissed the hands of the King and Queen. He had been resting but was now up and in informal clothing. The Queen was still in her room but extended her hand, looking quite distressed, which I believe she was, as she had always behaved with such grace since arriving in England, earning her widespread affection.
Thus concluded this sad and not joyful day.
Thus ended this sad and not happy day.
I can never forget the inexpressible luxury and profaneness, gaming, and all dissoluteness, and as it were total forgetfulness of God (it being Sunday evening), which this day se'nnight I was witness of, the King sitting and toying with his concubines, Portsmouth, Cleveland, and Mazarin, etc., a French boy singing love songs57 in that glorious gallery, while about twenty of the great courtiers and other dissolute persons were at Basset round a large table, a bank of at least 2,000 in gold before them; upon which two gentlemen, who were with me, made reflections with astonishment. Six days after, was all in the dust.
I can never forget the unbelievable luxury and wrongdoing, gambling, and complete disregard for God (it was Sunday evening), which I witnessed a week ago. The King was sitting and flirting with his mistresses, Portsmouth, Cleveland, and Mazarin, along with a French boy singing love songs57 in that stunning gallery. About twenty of the top courtiers and other wayward individuals were playing Basset around a large table, with a pot of at least 2,000 in gold in front of them. Two gentlemen who were with me expressed their astonishment at the scene. Six days later, it was all gone.
It was enjoined that those who put on mourning should wear it as for a father, in the most solemn manner.
It was required that those who mourn should do so as they would for a father, in the most respectful way.
10th February, 1685. Being sent to by the Sheriff of the County to appear and assist in proclaiming the King, I went the next day to Bromley, where I met the Sheriff and the Commander of the Kentish Troop, with an appearance, I suppose, of about 500 horse, and innumerable people, two of his Majesty's trumpets, and a Sergeant with other officers, who having drawn up the horse in a large field near the town, marched thence, with swords drawn, to the market place, where, making a ring, after sound of trumpets and silence made, the High Sheriff read the proclaiming titles to his bailiff, who repeated them aloud, and then, after many shouts of the people, his Majesty's health being drunk in a flint glass of a yard long, by the Sheriff, Commander, Officers, and chief gentlemen, they all dispersed, and I returned.
10th February, 1685. I was asked by the County Sheriff to show up and help announce the King, so I went to Bromley the next day. There, I met the Sheriff and the leader of the Kentish Troop, along with around 500 cavalry and countless spectators, two of the King's trumpeters, and a Sergeant with other officers. They gathered the horsemen in a large field near the town and then marched with their swords drawn to the market place. After forming a circle and sounding the trumpets, the High Sheriff read the proclamation titles to his bailiff, who repeated them loudly. Following a lot of cheers from the crowd, they toasted the King's health with a long flint glass that was a yard in length, raised by the Sheriff, Commander, Officers, and prominent gentlemen. After that, everyone dispersed, and I went home.
13th February, 1685. I passed a fine on selling of Honson Grange in Staffordshire, being about £20 per annum, which lying so great a distance, I thought fit to part with it to one Burton, a farmer there. It came to me[Pg 211] as part of my daughter-in-law's portion, this being but a fourth part of what was divided between the mother and three sisters.
13th February, 1685. I sold my interest in Honson Grange in Staffordshire, which brought in about £20 a year. Since it was quite far away, I decided to sell it to a farmer named Burton. It was given to me as part of my daughter-in-law's inheritance, which was only a fourth of what was divided among her mother and three sisters.
14th February, 1685. The King was this night very obscurely buried in a vault under Henry VII.'s Chapel at Westminster, without any manner of pomp, and soon forgotten after all this vanity, and the face of the whole Court was exceedingly changed into a more solemn and moral behavior; the new King affecting neither profaneness nor buffoonery. All the great officers broke their staves over the grave, according to form.
14th February, 1685. The King was quietly buried in a vault beneath Henry VII's Chapel at Westminster last night, without any ceremony, and soon forgotten after all this show. The entire Court’s demeanor changed to a more serious and respectful behavior; the new King showing no interest in indecency or foolishness. All the high-ranking officials broke their staffs over the grave, as per tradition.
15th February, 1685. Dr. Tenison preached to the household. The second sermon should have been before the King; but he, to the great grief of his subjects, did now, for the first time, go to mass publicly in the little Oratory at the Duke's lodgings, the doors being set wide open.
15th February, 1685. Dr. Tenison preached to the household. The second sermon was supposed to be in front of the King; however, much to the dismay of his subjects, he publicly attended mass for the first time in the small Oratory at the Duke's lodgings, with the doors wide open.
16th February, 1685. I dined at Sir Robert Howard's, auditor of the exchequer, a gentleman pretending to all manner of arts and sciences, for which he had been the subject of comedy, under the name of Sir Positive; not ill-natured, but insufferably boasting. He was son to the late Earl of Berkshire.
16th February, 1685. I had dinner at Sir Robert Howard's, the auditor of the exchequer, a guy who claims to be skilled in all sorts of arts and sciences, which got him made fun of in a comedy as Sir Positive; he wasn't mean-spirited, but he was incredibly proud of himself. He was the son of the late Earl of Berkshire.
17th February, 1685. This morning his Majesty restored the staff and key to Lord Arlington, Chamberlain; to Mr. Savell, Vice-chamberlain; to Lords Newport and Maynard, Treasurer and Comptroller of the household. Lord Godolphin made Chamberlain to the Queen; Lord Peterborough groom of the stole, in place of the Earl of Bath; the Treasurer's staff to the Earl of Rochester; and his brother, the Earl of Clarendon, Lord Privy Seal, in the place of the Marquis of Halifax, who was made President of the Council; the Secretaries of State remaining as before.
17th February, 1685. This morning, the King handed the staff and key back to Lord Arlington, the Chamberlain; to Mr. Savell, the Vice-chamberlain; and to Lords Newport and Maynard, who are the Treasurer and Comptroller of the household. Lord Godolphin became the Chamberlain to the Queen; Lord Peterborough was appointed groom of the stole, replacing the Earl of Bath; the Treasurer's staff was given to the Earl of Rochester; and his brother, the Earl of Clarendon, took over as Lord Privy Seal, replacing the Marquis of Halifax, who was made President of the Council; the Secretaries of State remained the same as before.
19th February, 1685. The Lord Treasurer and the other new officers were sworn at the Chancery Bar and the exchequer.
19th February, 1685. The Lord Treasurer and the other new officials took their oaths at the Chancery Bar and the Exchequer.
The late King having the revenue of excise, customs, and other late duties granted for his life only, they were now farmed and let to several persons, upon an opinion that the late King might let them for three years after his decease; some of the old commissioners refused to act. The lease was made but the day before the King died;58[Pg 212] the major part of the Judges (but, as some think, not the best lawyers), pronounced it legal, but four dissented.
The late King had the revenue from excise, customs, and other recent duties granted for his lifetime only, so these were now leased out to various individuals, based on the belief that the late King could lease them for three years after his death. Some of the old commissioners refused to participate. The lease was made just the day before the King died;58[Pg 212] most of the Judges (though some argue not the best lawyers) declared it legal, but four disagreed.
The clerk of the closet had shut up the late King's private oratory next the Privy-chamber above, but the King caused it to be opened again, and that prayers should be said as formerly.
The clerk of the closet had closed off the late King's private prayer room next to the Privy-chamber above, but the King had it reopened and insisted that prayers be said as before.
22d February, 1685. Several most useful tracts against Dissenters, Papists and Fanatics, and resolutions of cases were now published by the London divines.
22nd February, 1685. Several very useful writings against Dissenters, Catholics, and Fanatics, along with resolutions for various issues, were now published by the London theologians.
5th March, 1685. To my grief, I saw the new pulpit set up in the Popish Oratory at Whitehall for the Lent preaching, mass being publicly said, and the Romanists swarming at Court with greater confidence than had ever been seen in England since the Reformation, so that everybody grew jealous as to what this would tend.
5th March, 1685. To my sorrow, I saw the new pulpit set up in the Catholic Oratory at Whitehall for Lent preaching, mass being openly celebrated, and the Catholics gathering at Court with more confidence than ever seen in England since the Reformation, making everyone anxious about what this might lead to.
A Parliament was now summoned, and great industry used to obtain elections which might promote the Court interest, most of the corporations being now, by their new charters, empowered to make what returns of members they pleased.
A Parliament was now called, and a lot of effort was put into securing elections that would support the Court's interests, as most of the corporations were now able, thanks to their new charters, to choose whichever members they wanted.
There came over divers envoys and great persons to condole the death of the late King, who were received by the Queen-Dowager on a bed of mourning, the whole chamber, ceiling and floor, hung with black, and tapers were lighted, so as nothing could be more lugubrious and solemn. The Queen-Consort sat under a state on a black foot-cloth, to entertain the circle (as the Queen used to do), and that very decently.
Several envoys and important figures came to express their condolences for the death of the late King, and they were received by the Queen-Dowager on a mourning bed, with the entire room, including the ceiling and floor, draped in black, and candles lit, creating an atmosphere that was incredibly somber and solemn. The Queen-Consort sat on a throne with a black cover, hosting the gathering (as the Queen used to do), and she did so with great dignity.
6th March, 1685. Lent preachers continued as formerly in the Royal Chapel.
6th March, 1685. Lent preachers continued as before in the Royal Chapel.
7th March, 1685. My daughter, Mary, was taken with smallpox, and there soon was found no hope of her recovery. A great affliction to me: but God's holy will be done!
7th March, 1685. My daughter, Mary, contracted smallpox, and it quickly became clear that she wouldn’t recover. This is a great sorrow for me: but may God's will be done!
10th March, 1685. She received the blessed sacrament; after which, disposing herself to suffer what God should[Pg 213] determine to inflict, she bore the remainder of her sickness with extraordinary patience and piety, and more than ordinary resignation and blessed frame of mind. She died the 14th, to our unspeakable sorrow and affliction, and not to our's only, but that of all who knew her, who were many of the best quality, greatest and most virtuous persons. The justness of her stature, person, comeliness of countenance, gracefulness of motion, unaffected, though more than ordinarily beautiful, were the least of her ornaments compared with those of her mind. Of early piety, singularly religious, spending a part of every day in private devotion, reading, and other virtuous exercises; she had collected and written out many of the most useful and judicious periods of the books she read in a kind of common-place, as out of Dr. Hammond on the New Testament, and most of the best practical treatises. She had read and digested a considerable deal of history, and of places. The French tongue was as familiar to her as English; she understood Italian, and was able to render a laudable account of what she read and observed, to which assisted a most faithful memory and discernment; and she did make very prudent and discreet reflections upon what she had observed of the conversations among which she had at any time been, which being continually of persons of the best quality, she thereby improved. She had an excellent voice, to which she played a thorough-bass on the harpsichord, in both which she arrived to that perfection, that of the scholars of those two famous masters, Signors Pietro and Bartholomeo, she was esteemed the best; for the sweetness of her voice and management of it added such an agreeableness to her countenance, without any constraint or concern, that when she sung, it was as charming to the eye as to the ear; this I rather note, because it was a universal remark, and for which so many noble and judicious persons in music desired to hear her, the last being at Lord Arundel's, at Wardour.
10th March, 1685. She received the blessed sacrament; after which, preparing herself to endure whatever God decided to inflict, she faced the rest of her illness with remarkable patience and devotion, along with an extraordinary sense of resignation and a blessed state of mind. She passed away on the 14th, leaving us in indescribable sorrow and grief, and not just us, but all who knew her, many of whom were exceptional, noble, and virtuous individuals. Her stature, appearance, beauty, and graceful movements were the least of her attributes compared to the virtues of her mind. From an early age, she was notably pious and religious, dedicating part of each day to private prayer, reading, and other virtuous activities; she collected and wrote out many of the most useful and insightful passages from the books she read in a sort of commonplace book, including excerpts from Dr. Hammond on the New Testament and many of the best practical essays. She had studied and absorbed a significant amount of history and geography. The French language was as familiar to her as English; she understood Italian and could provide a thoughtful account of what she read and observed, aided by a very good memory and insight. She made prudent and thoughtful reflections on the conversations she participated in, which were always with people of high quality, enhancing her own understanding. She had an excellent singing voice and played thorough-bass on the harpsichord, achieving such skill that among the students of those two renowned masters, Signors Pietro and Bartholomeo, she was considered the best; the sweetness of her voice and the way she managed it made her singing as pleasing to the eye as it was to the ear. I mention this particularly because it was a widely shared observation, and many distinguished individuals in music sought the pleasure of hearing her, the last occasion being at Lord Arundel's, at Wardour.
What shall I say, or rather not say, of the cheerfulness and agreeableness of her humor? condescending to the meanest servant in the family, or others, she still kept up respect, without the least pride. She would often read to them, examine, instruct, and pray with them if they were sick, so as she was exceedingly beloved of[Pg 214] everybody. Piety was so prevalent an ingredient in her constitution (as I may say), that even among equals and superiors she no sooner became intimately acquainted, but she would endeavor to improve them, by insinuating something religious, and that tended to bring them to a love of devotion; she had one or two confidants with whom she used to pass whole days in fasting, reading, and prayers, especially before the monthly communion, and other solemn occasions. She abhorred flattery, and, though she had abundance of wit, the raillery was so innocent and ingenious that it was most agreeable; she sometimes would see a play, but since the stage grew licentious, expressed herself weary of them, and the time spent at the theater was an unaccountable vanity. She never played at cards without extreme importunity and for the company; but this was so very seldom, that I cannot number it among anything she could name a fault.
What can I say, or rather not say, about how cheerful and pleasant her humor was? She treated even the lowest servant in the household with respect, without any hint of pride. She often read to them, helped educate them, instructed them, and prayed with them when they were sick, which made her incredibly beloved by everyone. Her piety was such a strong part of who she was that as soon as she got close to her equals or superiors, she would try to inspire them by subtly introducing something religious that encouraged them to embrace devotion. She had one or two close friends with whom she would spend entire days fasting, reading, and praying, especially before the monthly communion and other important occasions. She despised flattery, and although she was very witty, her playful teasing was so innocent and clever that it was very enjoyable. Occasionally, she would watch a play, but since the theater had become inappropriate, she expressed her boredom with it, feeling that spending time there was pointless vanity. She never played cards unless she was really pushed to do so and only for the sake of companionship; but this happened so infrequently that I wouldn't even consider it a fault.
No one could read prose or verse better or with more judgment; and as she read, so she wrote, not only most correct orthography, with that maturity of judgment and exactness of the periods, choice of expressions, and familiarity of style, that some letters of hers have astonished me and others, to whom she has occasionally written. She had a talent of rehearsing any comical part or poem, as to them she might be decently free with; was more pleasing than heard on the theater; she danced with the greatest grace I had ever seen, and so would her master say, who was Monsieur Isaac; but she seldom showed that perfection, save in the gracefulness of her carriage, which was with an air of sprightly modesty not easily to be described. Nothing affected, but natural and easy as well in her deportment as in her discourse, which was always material, not trifling, and to which the extraordinary sweetness of her tone, even in familiar speaking, was very charming. Nothing was so pretty as her descending to play with little children, whom she would caress and humor with great delight. But she most affected to be with grave and sober men, of whom she might learn something, and improve herself. I have been assisted by her in reading and praying by me; comprehensive of uncommon notions, curious of knowing everything to some excess, had I not sometimes repressed it.[Pg 215]
No one could read prose or poetry better or with more insight; and as she read, so she wrote—not only with perfect spelling, but also with a maturity of judgment, precision in her sentences, careful word choice, and a familiarity in her style that left me and others amazed by some of her letters. She had a knack for performing any funny part or poem, displaying a level of playfulness that was more enjoyable than watching it acted out on stage; she danced with the most grace I had ever seen, and her teacher, Monsieur Isaac, would agree. However, she rarely demonstrated that perfection except in the elegance of her demeanor, which had a lively modesty that’s hard to describe. There was nothing forced about her—she was natural and effortless both in her behavior and her conversation, which was always meaningful, not trivial, and the extraordinary sweetness of her voice, even in casual chats, was very charming. There was nothing cuter than when she played with little kids, whom she would cuddle and entertain with great joy. But she preferred the company of serious and sober men from whom she could learn and better herself. She helped me with reading and praying; her mind held unique ideas, and she was overly curious about everything, though I sometimes had to hold that curiosity in check.[Pg 215]
Nothing was so delightful to her as to go into my Study, where she would willingly have spent whole days, for as I said she had read abundance of history, and all the best poets, even Terence, Plautus, Homer, Virgil, Horace, Ovid; all the best romancers and modern poems; she could compose happily and put in pretty symbols, as in the "Mundus Muliebris," wherein is an enumeration of the immense variety of the modes and ornaments belonging to the sex. But all these are vain trifles to the virtues which adorned her soul; she was sincerely religious, most dutiful to her parents, whom she loved with an affection tempered with great esteem, so as we were easy and free, and never were so well pleased as when she was with us, nor needed we other conversation; she was kind to her sisters, and was still improving them by her constant course of piety. Oh, dear, sweet, and desirable child, how shall I part with all this goodness and virtue without the bitterness of sorrow and reluctancy of a tender parent! Thy affection, duty and love to me was that of a friend as well as a child. Nor less dear to thy mother, whose example and tender care of thee was unparalleled, nor was thy return to her less conspicuous. Oh! how she mourns thy loss! how desolate hast thou left us! To the grave shall we both carry thy memory! God alone (in whose bosom thou art at rest and happy!) give us to resign thee and all our contentments (for thou indeed wert all in this world) to his blessed pleasure! Let him be glorified by our submission, and give us grace to bless him for the graces he implanted in thee, thy virtuous life, pious and holy death, which is indeed the only comfort of our souls, hastening through the infinite love and mercy of the Lord Jesus to be shortly with thee, dear child, and with thee and those blessed saints like thee, glorify the Redeemer of the world to all eternity! Amen.
Nothing was more enjoyable for her than to spend time in my Study, where she would gladly have spent entire days. As I mentioned, she had read plenty of history and all the greatest poets, including Terence, Plautus, Homer, Virgil, Horace, and Ovid; all the best romantic writers and modern poems. She could compose happily and create beautiful symbols, like in the "Mundus Muliebris," which lists the countless ways and adornments belonging to women. However, all of these were trivial compared to the virtues that filled her soul; she was genuinely religious, incredibly dutiful to her parents, whom she loved with deep respect. We were relaxed and free, and there was nothing we enjoyed more than having her with us; we didn't need any other company. She was kind to her sisters and continuously helped them grow with her unwavering devotion. Oh, dear, sweet, and cherished child, how will I cope with losing all this goodness and virtue without the bitter sorrow and reluctance of a loving parent? Your affection, duty, and love for me were those of both a friend and a child. You were equally precious to your mother, whose care and example for you were unparalleled, and your gratitude toward her was just as evident. Oh! how she grieves your absence! How lonely have you left us! We both will carry your memory to the grave! May God alone (in whose embrace you are at rest and happy!) help us to let you go and relinquish all our joys (for you truly were everything to us) to His blessed will! May He be glorified by our acceptance, and grant us the grace to thank Him for the virtues He instilled in you, your righteous life, and your pious and holy death, which is indeed our only comfort. We hasten, through the infinite love and mercy of the Lord Jesus, to soon be with you, dear child, and with you and those blessed saints like you, to glorify the Redeemer of the world for all eternity! Amen.
It was in the 19th year of her age that this sickness happened to her. An accident contributed to this disease; she had an apprehension of it in particular, which struck her but two days before she came home, by an imprudent gentlewoman whom she went with Lady Falkland to visit, who, after they had been a good while in the house, told them she has a servant sick of the smallpox (who indeed died the next day): this my poor child[Pg 216] acknowledged made an impression on her spirits. There were four gentlemen of quality offering to treat with me about marriage, and I freely gave her her own choice, knowing her discretion. She showed great indifference to marrying at all, for truly, says she to her mother (the other day), were I assured of your life and my dear father's, never would I part from you; I love you and this home, where we serve God, above all things, nor ever shall I be so happy; I know and consider the vicissitudes of the world, I have some experience of its vanities, and but for decency more than inclination, and that you judge it expedient for me, I would not change my condition, but rather add the fortune you design me to my sisters, and keep up the reputation of our family. This was so discreetly and sincerely uttered that it could not but proceed from an extraordinary child, and one who loved her parents beyond example.
It was when she was 19 that she fell ill. An accident contributed to her sickness; she had a premonition about it just two days before returning home, after visiting a thoughtless woman with Lady Falkland. This woman casually mentioned that one of her servants was sick with smallpox (who, in fact, died the next day). My poor child[Pg 216] admitted that this left a mark on her spirits. Four gentlemen of high standing were interested in marrying her, and I openly let her choose, trusting her judgment. She showed a strong indifference to the idea of marriage, saying to her mother (just the other day), if I could be sure of your life and my dear father’s, I would never want to leave you. I love you and this home, where we serve God, above all else, and I don’t think I could ever be happier. I understand the ups and downs of life, and I've seen its emptiness. If it weren't for decency rather than desire, and your belief that it's what’s best for me, I wouldn't want to change my situation. Instead, I would prefer to share the fortune you plan for me with my sisters and uphold the reputation of our family. This was expressed so thoughtfully and sincerely that it clearly came from an extraordinary child who loved her parents deeply.
At London, she took this fatal disease, and the occasion of her being there was this: my Lord Viscount Falkland's Lady having been our neighbor (as he was Treasurer of the Navy), she took so great an affection to my daughter, that when they went back in the autumn to the city, nothing would satisfy their incessant importunity but letting her accompany my Lady, and staying some time with her; it was with the greatest reluctance I complied. While she was there, my Lord being musical, when I saw my Lady would not part with her till Christmas, I was not unwilling she should improve the opportunity of learning of Signor Pietro, who had an admirable way both of composure and teaching. It was the end of February before I could prevail with my Lady to part with her; but my Lord going into Oxfordshire to stand for Knight of the Shire there, she expressed her wish to come home, being tired of the vain and empty conversation of the town, the theaters, the court, and trifling visits which consumed so much precious time, and made her sometimes miss of that regular course of piety that gave her the greatest satisfaction. She was weary of this life, and I think went not thrice to Court all this time, except when her mother or I carried her. She did not affect showing herself, she knew the Court well, and passed one summer in it at Windsor with Lady Tuke, one of the Queen's women of the bedchamber (a most[Pg 217] virtuous relation of hers); she was not fond of that glittering scene, now become abominably licentious, though there was a design of Lady Rochester and Lady Clarendon to have made her a maid of honor to the Queen as soon as there was a vacancy. But this she did not set her heart upon, nor indeed on anything so much as the service of God, a quiet and regular life, and how she might improve herself in the most necessary accomplishments, and to which she was arrived at so great a measure.
In London, she contracted this deadly illness, and the reason she was there was this: my Lord Viscount Falkland's wife, who was our neighbor (since he was the Treasurer of the Navy), became very fond of my daughter. When they returned to the city in the autumn, nothing would satisfy their persistent requests except allowing her to go with my Lady and spend some time with her; I complied with great reluctance. While she was there, my Lord, being musical, I noticed my Lady wouldn't let her go until Christmas, so I was open to her taking advantage of the opportunity to learn from Signor Pietro, who had an excellent way of both composing and teaching. It was the end of February before I could persuade my Lady to let her leave; however, as my Lord went to Oxfordshire to stand for Knight of the Shire, she expressed her desire to come home, feeling exhausted by the shallow and trivial conversations of the town, the theaters, the court, and meaningless visits that consumed so much valuable time and sometimes made her miss that consistent practice of piety that brought her the most satisfaction. She grew tired of this lifestyle, and I think she didn't go to the Court more than three times during this period, except when her mother or I took her. She didn't care about making an appearance; she knew the Court well, having spent one summer there at Windsor with Lady Tuke, one of the Queen's ladies-in-waiting (a very virtuous relative of hers); she wasn't fond of that flashy environment, which had become horrifically immoral, even though there was a plan by Lady Rochester and Lady Clarendon to make her a maid of honor to the Queen as soon as a vacancy arose. But she didn't focus on that or anything as much as she did on serving God, leading a calm and orderly life, and finding ways to better herself in the most essential skills, in which she had already made significant progress.
This is the little history and imperfect character of my dear child, whose piety, virtue, and incomparable endowments deserve a monument more durable than brass and marble. Precious is the memorial of the just. Much I could enlarge on every period of this hasty account, but that I ease and discharge my overcoming passion for the present, so many things worthy an excellent Christian and dutiful child crowding upon me. Never can I say enough, oh dear, my dear child, whose memory is so precious to me!
This is the brief history and flawed character of my beloved child, whose devotion, goodness, and unmatched qualities deserve a tribute more lasting than brass and marble. The memory of the righteous is invaluable. I could elaborate on every part of this quick summary, but I need to calm my overwhelming emotions for now, with so many thoughts about an exemplary Christian and dutiful child rushing to my mind. I can never express enough, oh dear, my precious child, whose memory means so much to me!
This dear child was born at Wotton, in the same house and chamber in which I first drew my breath, my wife having retired to my brother there in the great sickness that year upon the first of that month, and the very hour that I was born, upon the last: viz, October.
This dear child was born at Wotton, in the same house and room where I took my first breath, my wife having gone to stay with my brother during the great illness that year on the first of that month, and at the exact hour I was born, on the last: that is, October.
16th March, 1685. She was interred in the southeast end of the church at Deptford, near her grandmother and several of my younger children and relations. My desire was she should have been carried and laid among my own parents and relations at Wotton, where I desire to be interred myself, when God shall call me out of this uncertain transitory life, but some circumstances did not permit it. Our vicar, Dr. Holden, preached her funeral sermon on Phil. i. 21. "For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain," upon which he made an apposite discourse, as those who heard it assured me (for grief suffered me not to be present), concluding with a modest recital of her many virtues and signal piety, so as to draw both tears and admiration from the hearers. I was not altogether unwilling that something of this sort should be spoken, for the edification and encouragement of other young people.
16th March, 1685. She was buried at the southeast end of the church in Deptford, next to her grandmother and several of my younger children and relatives. I had hoped she would be laid to rest among my own parents and family at Wotton, where I also wish to be buried when God calls me from this uncertain, temporary life, but certain circumstances didn’t allow it. Our vicar, Dr. Holden, delivered her funeral sermon based on Phil. 1:21, "For me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain." He gave a relevant discourse, as those who attended told me (since my grief prevented me from being there), ending with a humble recounting of her many virtues and remarkable faith, moving the audience to tears and admiration. I was somewhat pleased that such words were spoken, for the edification and encouragement of other young people.
Divers noble persons honored her funeral, some in person, others sending their coaches, of which there were[Pg 218] six or seven with six horses, viz, the Countess of Sunderland, Earl of Clarendon, Lord Godolphin, Sir Stephen Fox, Sir William Godolphin, Viscount Falkland, and others. There were distributed among her friends about sixty rings.
Divers noble persons honored her funeral, some attending in person, others sending their carriages, of which there were[Pg 218] six or seven with six horses, including the Countess of Sunderland, the Earl of Clarendon, Lord Godolphin, Sir Stephen Fox, Sir William Godolphin, Viscount Falkland, and others. About sixty rings were given out to her friends.
Thus lived, died, and was buried the joy of my life, and ornament of her sex and of my poor family! God Almighty of his infinite mercy grant me the grace thankfully to resign myself and all I have, or had, to his divine pleasure, and in his good time, restoring health and comfort to my family: "teach me so to number my days, that I may apply my heart to wisdom," be prepared for my dissolution, and that into the hands of my blessed Savior I may recommend my spirit! Amen!
Thus lived, died, and was buried the joy of my life, and ornament of her gender and of my poor family! May God Almighty, in His infinite mercy, grant me the grace to accept with gratitude what I have, or had, and surrender it to His divine will, restoring health and comfort to my family in His good time: "Teach me to number my days, that I may apply my heart to wisdom," so I can be prepared for my end, and that I may commend my spirit into the hands of my blessed Savior! Amen!
On looking into her closet, it is incredible what a number of collections she had made from historians, poets, travelers, etc., but, above all, devotions, contemplations, and resolutions on these contemplations, found under her hand in a book most methodically disposed; prayers, meditations, and devotions on particular occasions, with many pretty letters to her confidants; one to a divine (not named) to whom she writes that he would be her ghostly father, and would not despise her for her many errors and the imperfections of her youth, but beg of God to give her courage to acquaint him with all her faults, imploring his assistance and spiritual directions. I well remember she had often desired me to recommend her to such a person; but I did not think fit to do it as yet, seeing her apt to be scrupulous, and knowing the great innocency and integrity of her life.
Upon looking into her closet, it's amazing how many collections she had gathered from historians, poets, travelers, and others, but most of all, there were devotions, reflections, and resolutions related to those reflections, all neatly organized in a book; prayers, meditations, and devotions for specific occasions, along with many lovely letters to her close friends; one addressed to a clergyman (whose name isn’t mentioned) in which she expresses her hope that he would be her spiritual mentor and not judge her for her many mistakes and the imperfections of her youth, but instead ask God to give her the courage to share all her faults with him, seeking his help and spiritual guidance. I remember she often asked me to recommend her to such a person; however, I felt it wasn't the right time to do so since she tended to be overly scrupulous, and I was aware of the genuine innocence and integrity of her life.
It is astonishing how one who had acquired such substantial and practical knowledge in other ornamental parts of education, especially music, both vocal and instrumental, in dancing, paying and receiving visits, and necessary conversation, could accomplish half of what she has left; but, as she never affected play or cards, which consume a world of precious time, so she was in continual exercise, which yet abated nothing of her most agreeable conversation. But she was a little miracle while she lived, and so she died!
It’s amazing how someone who had gained so much knowledge in various areas of education, especially music, both singing and playing instruments, dancing, social visits, and engaging conversations, could achieve even half of what she did. However, since she never cared for games or cards, which waste so much valuable time, she was always busy, yet that did not take away from her delightful conversations. She truly was a little miracle while she was alive, and that’s how she passed away!
26th March, 1685. I was invited to the funeral of Captain Gunman, that excellent pilot and seaman, who had behaved himself so gallantly in the Dutch war. He died[Pg 219] of a gangrene, occasioned by his fall from the pier of Calais. This was the Captain of the yacht carrying the Duke (now King) to Scotland, and was accused for not giving timely warning when she split on the sands, where so many perished; but I am most confident he was no ways guilty, either of negligence, or design, as he made appear not only at the examination of the matter of fact, but in the vindication he showed me, and which must needs give any man of reason satisfaction. He was a sober, frugal, cheerful, and temperate man; we have few such seamen left.
26th March, 1685. I was invited to the funeral of Captain Gunman, the excellent pilot and seaman who had acted so bravely during the Dutch war. He died[Pg 219] from gangrene, which resulted from his fall from the pier at Calais. He was the captain of the yacht that took the Duke (now King) to Scotland and was blamed for not warning in time when the yacht ran aground, leading to so many deaths; but I am absolutely certain he was in no way at fault, either through negligence or intention, as he demonstrated not only during the investigation of the incident but also in the defense he provided to me, which would satisfy any reasonable person. He was a sober, frugal, cheerful, and moderate man; we have very few seamen like him left.
8th April, 1685. Being now somewhat composed after my great affliction, I went to London to hear Dr. Tenison (it being on a Wednesday in Lent) at Whitehall. I observed that though the King was not in his seat above in the chapel, the Doctor made his three congees, which they were not used to do when the late King was absent, making then one bowing only. I asked the reason; it was said he had a special order so to do. The Princess of Denmark was in the King's closet, but sat on the left hand of the chair, the Clerk of the Closet standing by his Majesty's chair, as if he had been present.
8th April, 1685. Having calmed down a bit after my recent distress, I went to London to listen to Dr. Tenison (since it was a Wednesday in Lent) at Whitehall. I noticed that even though the King wasn’t in his seat up in the chapel, the Doctor still made his three bows, which they didn’t do when the late King was absent; back then, they only made one bow. I asked why, and I was told he had special instructions to do so. The Princess of Denmark was in the King's private room, but she sat on the left side of the chair, with the Clerk of the Closet standing by the King’s chair as if he were present.
I met the Queen Dowager going now first from Whitehall to dwell at Somerset House.
I ran into the Queen Dowager as she was leaving Whitehall for her new residence at Somerset House.
This day my brother of Wotton and Mr. Onslow were candidates for Surrey against Sir Adam Brown and my cousin, Sir Edward Evelyn, and were circumvented in their election by a trick of the Sheriff's, taking advantage of my brother's party going out of the small village of Leatherhead to seek shelter and lodging, the afternoon being tempestuous, proceeding to the election when they were gone; they expecting the next morning; whereas before and then they exceeded the other party by many hundreds, as I am assured. The Duke of Norfolk led Sir Edward Evelyn's and Sir Adam Brown's party. For this Parliament, very mean and slight persons (some of them gentlemen's servants, clerks, and persons neither of reputation nor interest) were set up; but the country would choose my brother whether he would or no, and he missed it by the trick above mentioned. Sir Adam Brown was so deaf, that he could not hear one word. Sir Edward Evelyn was an honest gentleman, much in favor with his Majesty.[Pg 220]
Today, my brother from Wotton and Mr. Onslow were running for election in Surrey against Sir Adam Brown and my cousin, Sir Edward Evelyn. They were outsmarted in the election by a trick from the Sheriff, who took advantage of my brother's supporters leaving the small village of Leatherhead to find shelter and accommodations, as the afternoon was stormy. They planned to return for the election the next morning, but by that time, they were already outnumbered by the other party by several hundred votes, as I've been told. The Duke of Norfolk led the group for Sir Edward Evelyn and Sir Adam Brown. For this Parliament, some very unremarkable and lesser people (including some of gentlemen's servants, clerks, and individuals without any reputation or influence) were put forward as candidates; however, the community wanted to elect my brother whether he agreed or not, and he lost due to the aforementioned trick. Sir Adam Brown was so deaf that he couldn't hear a single word. Sir Edward Evelyn was an honorable gentleman, well-liked by His Majesty.[Pg 220]
10th April, 1685. I went early to Whitehall to hear Dr. Tillotson, Dean of Canterbury, preaching on Eccles. ix. 18. I returned in the evening, and visited Lady Tuke, and found with her Sir George Wakeman, the physician, whom I had seen tried and acquitted, among the plotters for poisoning the late King, on the accusation of the famous Oates; and surely I believed him guiltless.
10th April, 1685. I got to Whitehall early to hear Dr. Tillotson, Dean of Canterbury, preach on Eccles. ix. 18. I came back in the evening and visited Lady Tuke, where I found Sir George Wakeman, the physician. I had seen him tried and cleared of the charges related to the plot to poison the late King, based on the accusations from the notorious Oates; and I truly believed he was innocent.
14th April, 1685. According to my custom, I went to London to pass the holy week.
14th April, 1685. As I usually do, I went to London to spend Holy Week.
17th April, 1685. Good Friday. Dr. Tenison preached at the new church at St. James, on 1 Cor. xvi. 22, upon the infinite love of God to us, which he illustrated in many instances. The Holy Sacrament followed, at which I participated. The Lord make me thankful! In the afternoon, Dr. Sprat, Bishop of Rochester, preached in Whitehall chapel, the auditory very full of Lords, the two Archbishops, and many others, now drawn to town upon occasion of the coronation and ensuing Parliament. I supped with the Countess of Sunderland and Lord Godolphin, and returned home.
17th April, 1685. Good Friday. Dr. Tenison preached at the new church at St. James, on 1 Cor. xvi. 22, about God's endless love for us, which he highlighted with many examples. The Holy Sacrament followed, and I took part in it. May the Lord keep me grateful! In the afternoon, Dr. Sprat, Bishop of Rochester, preached in Whitehall chapel, with a large audience of Lords, the two Archbishops, and many others, who had come to town for the coronation and the upcoming Parliament. I had dinner with the Countess of Sunderland and Lord Godolphin, then went home.
23d April, 1685. Was the coronation of the King and Queen. The solemnity was magnificent as is set forth in print. The Bishop of Ely preached; but, to the sorrow of the people, no Sacrament, as ought to have been. However, the King begins his reign with great expectations, and hopes of much reformation as to the late vices and profaneness of both Court and country. Having been present at the late King's coronation, I was not ambitious of seeing this ceremony.
23rd April, 1685. It was the coronation of the King and Queen. The ceremony was as magnificent as described in print. The Bishop of Ely preached, but, to the disappointment of the people, there was no Sacrament, which should have taken place. However, the King begins his reign with high hopes and expectations for significant reforms regarding the recent vices and inappropriate behavior of both the Court and the country. Having attended the previous King's coronation, I was not eager to witness this ceremony.
7th May, 1685. I was in Westminster Hall when Oates, who had made such a stir in the kingdom, on his revealing a plot of the Papists, and alarmed several Parliaments, and had occasioned the execution of divers priests, noblemen, etc., was tried for perjury at the King's bench; but, being very tedious, I did not endeavor to see the issue, considering that it would be published. Abundance of Roman Catholics were in the hall in expectation of the most grateful conviction and ruin of a person who had been so obnoxious to them, and as I verily[Pg 221] believe, had done much mischief and great injury to several by his violent and ill-grounded proceedings; while he was at first so unreasonably blown up and encouraged, that his insolence was no longer sufferable.
7th May, 1685. I was in Westminster Hall when Oates, who had stirred up so much trouble in the kingdom by exposing a supposed plot by Catholics, which alarmed several Parliaments and led to the execution of various priests, noblemen, and others, was on trial for perjury at the King's bench. However, since the proceedings were very lengthy, I didn’t make an effort to see how it concluded, considering it would be reported anyway. Many Roman Catholics were in the hall, hoping for a satisfying conviction and downfall of a person who had been so offensive to them, and I truly believe he had caused a lot of harm and great injury to many through his aggressive and unfounded actions; he had initially been so ridiculously inflated and supported that his arrogance became unbearable.
Mr. Roger L'Estrange (a gentleman whom I had long known, and a person of excellent parts, abating some affectations) appearing first against the Dissenters in several tracts, had now for some years turned his style against those whom (by way of hateful distinction) they called Whigs and Trimmers, under the title of "Observator," which came out three or four days every week, in which sheets, under pretense to serve the Church of England, he gave suspicion of gratifying another party, by several passages which rather kept up animosities than appeased them, especially now that nobody gave the least occasion.59
Mr. Roger L'Estrange (a gentleman I had known for a long time, and a person of great qualities, despite some quirks) initially came out against the Dissenters in several pamphlets. For the past few years, he had shifted his focus to those whom they called Whigs and Trimmers, under the title "Observator," which was published three or four times a week. In these publications, claiming to support the Church of England, he seemed to cater to another group with various remarks that fueled conflicts rather than resolved them, especially since no one had given any reason to escalate things.
10th May, 1685. The Scots valuing themselves exceedingly to have been the first Parliament called by his Majesty, gave the excise and customs to him and his successors forever; the Duke of Queensberry making eloquent speeches, and especially minding them of a speedy suppression of those late desperate Field-Conventiclers who had done such unheard of assassinations. In the meantime, elections for the ensuing Parliament in England were thought to be very indirectly carried on in most places. God grant a better issue of it than some expect!
10th May, 1685. The Scots were really proud to be the first Parliament called by the King, so they granted the excise and customs to him and his successors forever; the Duke of Queensberry made impressive speeches, especially reminding everyone about the urgent need to deal with the recent violent Field-Conventiclers who had committed shocking murders. Meanwhile, the elections for the upcoming Parliament in England were believed to be happening in a pretty questionable manner in most places. Hopefully, it turns out better than some people expect!
16th May, 1685. Oates was sentenced to be whipped and pilloried with the utmost severity.
16th May, 1685. Oates was sentenced to be whipped and put in the pillory with the maximum severity.
21st May, 1685. I dined at my Lord Privy Seal's with Sir William Dugdale, Garter King-at-Arms, author of the "Monasticon" and other learned works; he told me he was 82 years of age, and had his sight and memory perfect. There was shown a draft of the exact shape and dimensions of the crown the Queen had been crowned withal, together with the jewels and pearls, their weight and value, which amounted to £100,658 sterling, attested[Pg 222] at the foot of the paper by the jeweler and goldsmith who set them.
21st May, 1685. I had dinner at my Lord Privy Seal's with Sir William Dugdale, Garter King-at-Arms, who wrote the "Monastic Life" and other scholarly works; he told me he was 82 years old and had perfect sight and memory. They showed a draft of the exact shape and dimensions of the crown the Queen was crowned with, along with the jewels and pearls, their weight and value, which added up to £100,658 sterling, confirmed[Pg 222] at the bottom of the paper by the jeweler and goldsmith who set them.
22d May, 1685. In the morning, I went with a French gentleman, and my Lord Privy Seal to the House of Lords, where we were placed by his Lordship next the bar, just below the bishops, very commodiously both for hearing and seeing. After a short space, came in the Queen and Princess of Denmark, and stood next above the archbishops, at the side of the House on the right hand of the throne. In the interim, divers of the Lords, who had not finished before, took the test and usual oaths, so that her Majesty, the Spanish and other Ambassadors, who stood behind the throne, heard the Pope and the worship of the Virgin Mary, etc., renounced very decently, as likewise the prayers which followed, standing all the while. Then came in the King, the crown on his head, and being seated, the Commons were introduced, and the House being full, he drew forth a paper containing his speech, which he read distinctly enough, to this effect: "That he resolved to call a Parliament from the moment of his brother's decease, as the best means to settle all the concerns of the nation, so as to be most easy and happy to himself and his subjects; that he would confirm whatever he had said in his declaration at the first Council concerning his opinion of the principles of the Church of England, for their loyalty, and would defend and support it, and preserve its government as by law now established; that, as he would invade no man's property, so he would never depart from his own prerogative; and, as he had ventured his life in defense of the nation, so he would proceed to do still; that, having given this assurance of his care of our religion (his word was YOUR religion) and property (which he had not said by chance, but solemnly), so he doubted not of suitable returns of his subjects' duty and kindness, especially as to settling his revenue for life, for the many weighty necessities of government, which he would not suffer to be precarious; that some might possibly suggest that it were better to feed and supply him from time to time only, out of their inclination to frequent Parliaments; but that that would be a very improper method to take with him, since the best way to engage him to meet oftener would be always to use him well, and therefore[Pg 223] he expected their compliance speedily, that this session being but short, they might meet again to satisfaction."
22nd May, 1685. In the morning, I went with a French gentleman and my Lord Privy Seal to the House of Lords, where we were seated by his Lordship next to the bar, just below the bishops, quite conveniently for hearing and seeing. After a short while, the Queen and the Princess of Denmark entered and stood just above the archbishops, at the right side of the House near the throne. Meanwhile, several Lords, who hadn't completed it before, took the test and the usual oaths, so that her Majesty, the Spanish and other Ambassadors, who stood behind the throne, heard the Pope and the worship of the Virgin Mary, etc., renounced quite decently, as well as the prayers that followed, standing the whole time. Then the King entered, wearing the crown, and after taking his seat, the Commons were introduced, and with the House being full, he brought out a paper containing his speech, which he read clearly enough, saying: "That he intended to call a Parliament from the moment of his brother's death, as the best way to settle all the affairs of the nation, making things easiest and happiest for himself and his subjects; that he would confirm everything he had stated in his declaration at the first Council regarding his views on the principles of the Church of England, their loyalty, and that he would defend and support it, preserving its government as established by law; that, while he would not invade anyone's property, he would also never forsake his own prerogative; and, as he had risked his life in defense of the nation, he would continue to do so; that, having given this assurance of his care for our religion (his words were YOUR religion) and property (which he did not say lightly, but with seriousness), he had no doubts about receiving suitable expressions of duty and kindness from his subjects, especially in settling his revenue for life, given the many critical needs of governance, which he would not allow to be uncertain; that some might suggest it would be better to support him from time to time only, out of their desire for frequent Parliaments; but that would be a very inappropriate approach, since the best way to encourage him to meet more often would be to treat him well, and therefore[Pg 223] he anticipated their prompt cooperation, so that this short session could conclude to their satisfaction."
At every period of this, the House gave loud shouts. Then he acquainted them with that morning's news of Argyle's being landed in the West Highlands of Scotland from Holland, and the treasonous declaration he had published, which he would communicate to them, and that he should take the best care he could it should meet with the reward it deserved, not questioning the Parliament's zeal and readiness to assist him as he desired; at which there followed another "Vive le Roi," and so his Majesty retired.
At every moment during this, the House erupted in loud cheers. Then he informed them about that morning's news of Argyle landing in the West Highlands of Scotland from Holland, and the treasonous declaration he had released, which he would share with them. He assured them he would do his best to ensure it received the punishment it deserved, confident in Parliament's eagerness and willingness to support him as he wished. This led to another "Vive le Roi," and with that, his Majesty left.
So soon as the Commons were returned and had put themselves into a grand committee, they immediately put the question, and unanimously voted the revenue to his Majesty for life. Mr. Seymour made a bold speech against many elections, and would have had those members who (he pretended) were obnoxious, to withdraw, till they had cleared the matter of their being legally returned; but no one seconded him. The truth is, there were many of the new members whose elections and returns were universally censured, many of them being persons of no condition, or interest, in the nation, or places for which they served, especially in Devon, Cornwall, Norfolk, etc., said to have been recommended by the Court, and from the effect of the new charters changing the electors. It was reported that Lord Bath carried down with him [into Cornwall] no fewer than fifteen charters, so that some called him the Prince Elector: whence Seymour told the House in his speech that if this was digested, they might introduce what religion and laws they pleased, and that though he never gave heed to the fears and jealousies of the people before, he was now really apprehensive of Popery. By the printed list of members of 505, there did not appear to be above 135 who had been in former Parliaments, especially that lately held at Oxford.
As soon as the Commons returned and formed a grand committee, they quickly addressed the issue and unanimously voted to grant the revenue to his Majesty for life. Mr. Seymour gave a strong speech against several elections and suggested that those members who he claimed were problematic should step aside until their legitimacy was established; however, no one supported him. The truth is, many of the new members had elections that were widely criticized, as many were individuals with no status or influence in the nation or the areas they represented, particularly in Devon, Cornwall, Norfolk, etc., and were said to have been backed by the Court, thanks to the new charters that changed the electorate. It was reported that Lord Bath brought back at least fifteen charters into Cornwall, earning him the nickname "Prince Elector." In his speech, Seymour warned the House that if this situation continued, they could impose any religion and laws they wanted, and although he had never paid attention to the people's fears and suspicions before, he was now genuinely worried about Popery. According to the printed list of 505 members, there were only about 135 who had served in previous Parliaments, especially the one recently held at Oxford.
In the Lords' House, Lord Newport made an exception against two or three young Peers, who wanted some months, and some only four or five days, of being of age.
In the House of Lords, Lord Newport made an exception for two or three young peers, who needed a few months, and some only four or five days, to reach adulthood.
The Popish Lords, who had been sometime before released from their confinement about the plot, were now discharged of their impeachment, of which I gave Lord Arundel of Wardour joy.[Pg 224]
The Catholic Lords, who had previously been released from their confinement related to the plot, were now cleared of their charges, which I congratulated Lord Arundel of Wardour on.[Pg 224]
Oates, who had but two days before been pilloried at several places and whipped at the cart's tail from Newgate to Aldgate, was this day placed on a sledge, being not able to go by reason of so late scourging, and dragged from prison to Tyburn, and whipped again all the way, which some thought to be severe and extraordinary; but, if he was guilty of the perjuries, and so of the death of many innocents (as I fear he was), his punishment was but what he deserved. I chanced to pass just as execution was doing on him. A strange revolution!
Oates, who had just been publicly shamed at several locations and whipped from Newgate to Aldgate only two days earlier, was placed on a sledge today since he couldn't walk due to his recent beating. He was dragged from prison to Tyburn, enduring more whipping all the way, which some considered harsh and unusual; however, if he was guilty of lying under oath and causing the deaths of many innocent people (which I fear he was), then his punishment was exactly what he deserved. I happened to pass by just as they were executing him. What a strange turn of events!
Note: there was no speech made by the Lord Keeper [Bridgman] after his Majesty, as usual.
Note: there was no speech made by the Lord Keeper [Bridgman] after his Majesty, as usual.
It was whispered he would not be long in that situation, and many believe the bold Chief Justice Jefferies, who was made Baron of Wem, in Shropshire, and who went thorough stitch in that tribunal, stands fair for that office. I gave him joy the morning before of his new honor, he having always been very civil to me.
It was rumored he wouldn’t stay in that position for long, and many think the daring Chief Justice Jefferies, who was made Baron of Wem in Shropshire and who went through a tough process in that court, is likely to get that job. I congratulated him the morning before on his new title, as he had always been very kind to me.
24th May, 1685. We had hitherto not any rain for many months, so as the caterpillars had already devoured all the winter fruit through the whole land, and even killed several greater old trees. Such two winters and summers I had never known.
24th May, 1685. We hadn’t had any rain for many months, so the caterpillars had already eaten all the winter fruit across the entire land, and they even killed several large old trees. I had never experienced such two winters and summers.
4th June, 1685. Came to visit and take leave of me Sir Gabriel Sylvius, now going Envoy-extraordinary into Denmark, with his secretary and chaplain, a Frenchman, who related the miserable persecution of the Protestants in France; not above ten churches left them, and those also threatened to be demolished; they were commanded to christen their children within twenty-four hours after birth, or else a Popish priest was to be called, and then the infant brought up in Popery. In some places, they were thirty leagues from any minister, or opportunity of worship. This persecution had displeased the most industrious part of the nation, and dispersed those into Switzerland, Burgundy, Holland, Germany, Denmark, England, and the Plantations. There were with Sir Gabriel, his lady, Sir William Godolphin and sisters, and my Lord Godolphin's little son, my charge. I brought them to the water side where Sir Gabriel embarked, and the rest returned to London.
4th June, 1685. Sir Gabriel Sylvius came to visit and say goodbye to me, as he was about to head off as an Envoy Extraordinary to Denmark, accompanied by his secretary and a French chaplain. He shared the terrible persecution of Protestants in France; there were only about ten churches left for them, and those were also under threat of destruction. They were ordered to baptize their children within twenty-four hours of birth, or else a Catholic priest would be called in, raising the child in Catholicism. In some areas, they were thirty leagues away from any minister or place of worship. This persecution had angered the most hardworking people in the nation and forced many to flee to Switzerland, Burgundy, Holland, Germany, Denmark, England, and the colonies. With Sir Gabriel were his wife, Sir William Godolphin and his sisters, and my Lord Godolphin's little son, who was under my care. I took them to the water side where Sir Gabriel boarded his ship, and the others returned to London.
14th June, 1685. There was now certain intelligence of the Duke of Monmouth landing at Lyme, in Dorset[Pg 225]shire, and of his having set up his standard as King of England. I pray God deliver us from the confusion which these beginnings threaten!
14th June, 1685. We now have confirmed news that the Duke of Monmouth has landed at Lyme in Dorset[Pg 225]shire and has declared himself King of England. I pray God keeps us safe from the chaos these events may bring!
Such a dearth for want of rain was never in my memory.
Such a lack of rain has never happened, as far as I can remember.
17th June, 1685. The Duke landed with but 150 men; but the whole kingdom was alarmed, fearing that the disaffected would join them, many of the trained bands flocking to him. At his landing, he published a Declaration, charging his Majesty with usurpation and several horrid crimes, on pretense of his own title, and offering to call a free Parliament. This declaration was ordered to be burnt by the hangman, the Duke proclaimed a traitor, and a reward of £5,000 to any who should kill him.
17th June, 1685. The Duke arrived with only 150 men; however, the entire kingdom was on edge, worried that those opposed to the government would join him, and many of the local militias rushed to his side. Upon landing, he released a Declaration accusing the King of usurpation and various terrible crimes, claiming his own right to the throne, and offering to convene a free Parliament. This declaration was ordered to be burned by the hangman, the Duke was declared a traitor, and a reward of £5,000 was put up for anyone who could kill him.
At this time, the words engraved on the monument in London, intimating that the Papists fired the city, were erased and cut out.
At this time, the words engraved on the monument in London, suggesting that the Catholics set the city on fire, were removed and erased.
The exceeding drought still continues.
The severe drought is ongoing.
18th June, 1685. I received a warrant to send out a horse with twelve days' provisions, etc.
18th June, 1685. I got a warrant to send out a horse with twelve days' worth of supplies, etc.
28th June, 1685. We had now plentiful rain after two years' excessive drought and severe winters.
28th June, 1685. We are now experiencing plenty of rain after two years of extreme drought and harsh winters.
Argyle taken in Scotland, and executed, and his party dispersed.
Argyle was captured in Scotland, executed, and his group was scattered.
2d July, 1685. No considerable account of the troops sent against the Duke, though great forces sent. There was a smart skirmish; but he would not be provoked to come to an encounter, but still kept in the fastnesses.
2d July, 1685. There's no significant report on the troops sent against the Duke, even though large forces were deployed. There was a fierce skirmish, but he refused to engage in a confrontation and continued to stay in the strongholds.
Dangerfield whipped, like Oates, for perjury.
Dangerfield was punished for perjury, just like Oates.
8th July, 1685. Came news of Monmouth's utter defeat, and the next day of his being taken by Sir William Portman and Lord Lumley with the militia of their counties. It seems the Horse, commanded by Lord Grey, being newly raised and undisciplined, were not to be brought in so short a time to endure the fire, which exposed the Foot to the King's, so as when Monmouth had led the Foot in great silence and order, thinking to surprise Lieutenant-General Lord Feversham newly encamped, and given him a smart charge, interchanging both great and small shot, the Horse, breaking their own ranks, Monmouth gave it over, and fled with Grey, leaving their party to be cut in pieces to the number of[Pg 226] 2,000. The whole number reported to be above 8,000; the King's but 2,700. The slain were most of them Mendip-miners, who did great execution with their tools, and sold their lives very dearly, while their leaders flying were pursued and taken the next morning, not far from one another. Monmouth had gone sixteen miles on foot, changing his habit for a poor coat, and was found by Lord Lumley in a dry ditch covered with fern-brakes, but without sword, pistol, or any weapon, and so might have passed for some countryman, his beard being grown so long and so gray as hardly to be known, had not his George discovered him, which was found in his pocket. It is said he trembled exceedingly all over, not able to speak. Grey was taken not far from him. Most of his party were Anabaptists and poor cloth workers of the country, no gentlemen of account being come in to him. The arch-boutefeu, Ferguson, Matthews, etc., were not yet found. The £5,000 to be given to whoever should bring Monmouth in, was to be distributed among the militia by agreement between Sir William Portman and Lord Lumley. The battle ended, some words, first in jest, then in passion, passed between Sherrington Talbot (a worthy gentleman, son to Sir John Talbot, and who had behaved himself very handsomely) and one Captain Love, both commanders of the militia, as to whose soldiers fought best, both drawing their swords and passing at one another. Sherrington was wounded to death on the spot, to the great regret of those who knew him. He was Sir John's only son.
8th July, 1685. News came in about Monmouth's complete defeat, and the following day, we learned he was captured by Sir William Portman and Lord Lumley along with the local militia. It seems the cavalry, led by Lord Grey, were newly formed and inexperienced, and they couldn’t hold up against the fire. This left the infantry exposed to the King's troops. Monmouth had led his foot soldiers quietly and in good order, hoping to surprise Lieutenant-General Lord Feversham, who was recently encamped, and launched a strong attack, exchanging both heavy and light fire. However, the cavalry broke their ranks, forcing Monmouth to abandon the fight and flee with Grey, leaving their men to be slaughtered, totaling around 2,000. The total number reported was over 8,000; the King's forces were only about 2,700. Most of the slain were Mendip miners, who fought bravely with their tools and sold their lives dearly, while their leaders fled and were captured the next morning, not far apart from each other. Monmouth had walked sixteen miles, changing into a poor coat, and was found by Lord Lumley in a dry ditch covered with ferns, without a sword, pistol, or any weapon, and could have easily passed for a common farmer, except for his long, gray beard that made him hard to recognize, had it not been for the George medal found in his pocket. It’s said he was shaking violently and could hardly speak. Grey was captured not far from him. Most of his followers were Anabaptists and poor cloth workers from the area, as no notable gentlemen had joined him. The key instigators, Ferguson, Matthews, and others, were not found yet. The £5,000 reward for capturing Monmouth was to be shared among the militia as agreed by Sir William Portman and Lord Lumley. After the battle, a playful argument escalated into a heated exchange between Sherrington Talbot (a respectable gentleman, son of Sir John Talbot, who had performed admirably) and Captain Love, both militia leaders, about whose soldiers fought better, which led to them drawing their swords and facing off. Sherrington was mortally wounded right then and there, causing great sorrow among those who knew him. He was Sir John’s only son.
9th July, 1685. Just as I was coming into the lodgings at Whitehall, a little before dinner, my Lord of Devonshire standing very near his Majesty's bedchamber door in the lobby, came Colonel Culpeper, and in a rude manner looking at my Lord in the face, asked whether this was a time and place for excluders to appear; my Lord at first took little notice of what he said, knowing him to be a hotheaded fellow, but he reiterating it, my Lord asked Culpeper whether he meant him; he said yes, he meant his Lordship. My Lord told him he was no excluder (as indeed he was not); the other affirming it again, my Lord told him he lied; on which Culpeper struck him a box on the ear, which my Lord returned, and felled him. They were soon parted, Culpeper was seized,[Pg 227] and his Majesty, who was all the while in his bedchamber, ordered him to be carried to the Greencloth officer, who sent him to the Marshalsea, as he deserved. My Lord Devon had nothing said to him.
9th July, 1685. Just as I was entering the lodgings at Whitehall, a little before dinner, my Lord of Devonshire was standing very close to His Majesty's bedchamber door in the lobby when Colonel Culpeper approached. In a rude manner, he looked my Lord in the face and asked if this was the time and place for excluders to appear. My Lord initially ignored him, knowing him to be a hothead, but when Culpeper repeated his question, my Lord asked if he was referring to him. Culpeper confirmed that he meant his Lordship. My Lord replied that he was no excluder (which he indeed wasn’t). When the other insisted again, my Lord told him he was lying. In response, Culpeper slapped him on the ear, which my Lord returned, knocking him down. They were quickly separated, and Culpeper was apprehended. His Majesty, who had been in his bedchamber the whole time, ordered him to be taken to the Greencloth officer, who sent him to the Marshalsea, as he deserved. My Lord Devon had nothing said to him.
I supped this night at Lambeth at my old friend's Mr. Elias Ashmole's, with my Lady Clarendon, the Bishop of St. Asaph, and Dr. Tenison, when we were treated at a great feast.
I had dinner tonight at Lambeth with my old friend Mr. Elias Ashmole, Lady Clarendon, the Bishop of St. Asaph, and Dr. Tenison, where we enjoyed a lavish feast.
10th July, 1685. The Count of Castel Mellor, that great favorite and prime minister of Alphonso, late King of Portugal, after several years' banishment, being now received to grace and called home by Don Pedro, the present King, as having been found a person of the greatest integrity after all his sufferings, desired me to spend part of this day with him, and assist him in a collection of books and other curiosities, which he would carry with him into Portugal.
10th July, 1685. The Count of Castel Mellor, a close ally and prime minister to Alphonso, the former King of Portugal, after years of exile, has been welcomed back and summoned home by Don Pedro, the current King, who recognized his remarkable integrity despite all his hardships. He asked me to spend part of the day with him, helping him gather books and other curiosities to take back to Portugal.
Mr. Hussey, a young gentleman who made love to my late dear child, but whom she could not bring herself to answer in affection, died now of the same cruel disease, for which I was extremely sorry, because he never enjoyed himself after my daughter's decease, nor was I averse to the match, could she have overcome her disinclination.
Mr. Hussey, a young man who pursued my late dear child, but whom she couldn’t bring herself to love back, has now died from the same cruel disease. I felt very sorry about this because he never found happiness after my daughter's passing. I also wouldn’t have been against the match if she could have gotten past her feelings of reluctance.
15th July, 1685. I went to see Dr. Tenison's library [in St. Martin's].
15th July, 1685. I went to check out Dr. Tenison's library [in St. Martin's].
Monmouth was this day brought to London and examined before the King, to whom he made great submission, acknowledged his seduction by Ferguson, the Scot, whom he named the bloody villain. He was sent to the Tower, had an interview with his late Duchess, whom he received coldly, having lived dishonestly with the Lady Henrietta Wentworth for two years. He obstinately asserted his conversation with that debauched woman to be no sin; whereupon, seeing he could not be persuaded to his last breath, the divines who were sent to assist him thought not fit to administer the Holy Communion to him. For the rest of his faults he professed great sorrow, and so died without any apparent fear. He would not make use of a cap or other circumstance, but lying down, bid the fellow to do his office better than to the late Lord Russell, and gave him gold; but the wretch made five chops before he had his head off; which so[Pg 228] incensed the people, that had he not been guarded and got away, they would have torn him to pieces.
Monmouth was brought to London today and examined by the King, to whom he showed great humility and admitted he was led astray by Ferguson, the Scot, whom he called a bloody villain. He was sent to the Tower and had a meeting with his former Duchess, which he received coldly, as he had lived dishonestly with Lady Henrietta Wentworth for two years. He stubbornly claimed that his relationship with that scandalous woman was not a sin; seeing that he could not be persuaded until his last breath, the religious leaders sent to help him decided it was not appropriate to give him Holy Communion. For the rest of his wrongdoings, he expressed deep regret and died without any visible fear. He refused to use a cap or any other adornment, and while lying down, he told the executioner to do his job better than he had with the late Lord Russell, giving him gold in the process. However, the executioner fumbled and made five attempts before he managed to behead him, which incensed the crowd so much that if he hadn’t been guarded and escaped, they would have torn him to pieces.
The Duke made no speech on the scaffold (which was on Tower Hill), but gave a paper containing not above five or six lines, for the King, in which he disclaims all title to the Crown, acknowledges that the late King, his father, had indeed told him he was but his base son, and so desired his Majesty to be kind to his wife and children. This relation I had from Dr. Tenison (Rector of St. Martin's), who, with the Bishops of Ely and Bath and Wells, were sent to him by his Majesty, and were at the execution.
The Duke didn’t give a speech on the scaffold (which was on Tower Hill), but handed over a paper with no more than five or six lines for the King. In it, he renounced any claim to the Crown, confirmed that his late father, the King, had indeed told him he was nothing more than a bastard son, and asked his Majesty to show kindness to his wife and children. I got this account from Dr. Tenison (Rector of St. Martin's), who, along with the Bishops of Ely and Bath and Wells, was sent by his Majesty and attended the execution.
Thus ended this quondam Duke, darling of his father and the ladies, being extremely handsome and adroit, an excellent soldier and dancer, a favorite of the people, of an easy nature, debauched by lust; seduced by crafty knaves, who would have set him up only to make a property, and taken the opportunity of the King being of another religion, to gather a party of discontented men. He failed and perished.
Thus ended this former Duke, beloved by his father and the ladies, being very handsome and skillful, an excellent soldier and dancer, a favorite among the people, of a laid-back nature, corrupted by lust; manipulated by deceitful schemers, who would have lifted him up just to exploit him, taking advantage of the King being of a different religion, to rally a group of discontented men. He failed and was lost.
He was a lovely person, had a virtuous and excellent lady that brought him great riches, and a second dukedom in Scotland. He was Master of the Horse, General of the King his father's army, Gentleman of the Bedchamber, Knight of the Garter, Chancellor of Cambridge, in a word, had accumulations without end. See what ambition and want of principles brought him to! He was beheaded on Tuesday, 14th of July. His mother, whose name was Barlow, daughter of some very mean creatures, was a beautiful strumpet, whom I had often seen at Paris; she died miserably without anything to bury her; yet this Perkin had been made to believe that the King had married her, a monstrous and ridiculous forgery! And to satisfy the world of the iniquity of the report, the King his father (if his father he really was, for he most resembled one Sidney who was familiar with his mother) publicly and most solemnly renounced it, to be so entered in the Council Book some years since, with all the Privy Councillors' attestation.60
He was a great guy, had a virtuous and amazing wife who brought him immense wealth, and a second dukedom in Scotland. He served as Master of the Horse, General of the King his father's army, Gentleman of the Bedchamber, Knight of the Garter, Chancellor of Cambridge—in short, he had endless accomplishments. Look where ambition and lack of principles got him! He was beheaded on Tuesday, July 14. His mother, named Barlow, was the daughter of some very lowly people and was a beautiful woman of questionable reputation, whom I had often seen in Paris; she died in misery without anything to bury her with. Yet this Perkin had been led to believe that the King had married her, which was a monstrous and ridiculous lie! To prove the falsehood of the claim, the King his father (if he really was his father, given he looked much more like a guy named Sidney who was familiar with his mother) publicly and solemnly denied it, and it was recorded in the Council Book several years ago, with the endorsement of all the Privy Councillors. 60
Had it not pleased God to dissipate this attempt in the beginning, there would in all appearance have gathered an irresistible force which would have desperately proceeded to the ruin of the Church and Government; so general was the discontent and expectation of the opportunity. For my own part, I looked upon this deliverance as most signal. Such an inundation of fanatics and men of impious principles must needs have caused universal disorder, cruelty, injustice, rapine, sacrilege, and confusion, an unavoidable civil war, and misery without end. Blessed be God, the knot was happily broken, and a fair prospect of tranquillity for the future, if we reform, be thankful, and make a right use of this mercy!
If it hadn't pleased God to stop this attempt early on, it seems there would have formed an unstoppable force that would have ruthlessly proceeded to destroy the Church and Government; such was the widespread discontent and anticipation of the opportunity. For my part, I viewed this deliverance as very significant. Such a flood of fanatics and people with immoral beliefs would undoubtedly have led to total disorder, cruelty, injustice, theft, sacrilege, and chaos, an inevitable civil war, and endless misery end. Thank God, the threat was thankfully averted, and there is a promising chance for peace moving forward, if we reform, show gratitude, and properly appreciate this blessing!
18th July, 1685. I went to see the muster of the six Scotch and English regiments whom the Prince of Orange had lately sent to his Majesty out of Holland upon this rebellion, but which were now returning, there having been no occasion for their use. They were all excellently clad and well disciplined, and were encamped on Blackheath with their tents: the King and Queen came to see them exercise, and the manner of their encampment, which was very neat and magnificent.
18th July, 1685. I went to watch the gathering of the six Scottish and English regiments that the Prince of Orange had recently sent to the King from Holland due to this rebellion, but they were now returning since they weren't needed. They were all dressed sharply and well-disciplined, and they were set up on Blackheath with their tents. The King and Queen came to watch them practice and check out their camp, which looked very tidy and impressive.
By a gross mistake of the Secretary of his Majesty's Forces, it had been ordered that they should be quartered in private houses, contrary to an Act of Parliament, but, on my informing his Majesty timely of it, it was prevented.[Pg 230]
By a major mistake from the Secretary of His Majesty's Forces, it was ordered that they be stationed in private homes, which went against an Act of Parliament. However, after I informed His Majesty about it promptly, it was stopped.[Pg 230]
The two horsemen which my son and myself sent into the county troops, were now come home, after a month's being out to our great charge.
The two horsemen that my son and I sent to the county troops have now returned home after being away for a month, which has cost us a lot.
20th July, 1685. The Trinity Company met this day, which should have been on the Monday after Trinity, but was put off by reason of the Royal Charter being so large, that it could not be ready before. Some immunities were superadded. Mr. Pepys, Secretary to the Admiralty, was a second time chosen Master. There were present the Duke of Grafton, Lord Dartmouth, Master of the Ordnance, the Commissioners of the Navy, and Brethren of the Corporation. We went to church, according to custom, and then took barge to the Trinity House, in London, where we had a great dinner, above eighty at one table.
20th July, 1685. The Trinity Company met today, which was supposed to be on the Monday after Trinity, but it was postponed because the Royal Charter was so lengthy that it couldn't be ready in time. Some additional privileges were granted. Mr. Pepys, Secretary to the Admiralty, was chosen as Master for the second time. Present were the Duke of Grafton, Lord Dartmouth, Master of the Ordnance, the Commissioners of the Navy, and members of the Corporation. We went to church, as usual, and then took a barge to the Trinity House in London, where we had a large dinner with over eighty people at one table.
7th August, 1685. I went to see Mr. Watts, keeper of the Apothecaries' garden of simples at Chelsea, where there is a collection of innumerable rarities of that sort particularly, besides many rare annuals, the tree bearing Jesuit's bark, which had done such wonders in quartan agues. What was very ingenious was the subterranean heat, conveyed by a stove under the conservatory, all vaulted with brick, so as he has the doors and windows open in the hardest frosts, secluding only the snow.
7th August, 1685. I visited Mr. Watts, the keeper of the Apothecaries' garden of herbs at Chelsea, where there's an incredible collection of unique plants, including many rare annuals and the tree that produces Jesuit's bark, which has been so effective in treating quartan fevers. What was particularly clever was the underground heat, provided by a stove under the conservatory, which is all brick-vaulted, allowing him to keep the doors and windows open even during the harshest frosts, while only keeping out the snow.
15th August, 1685. Came to visit us Mr. Boscawen, with my Lord Godolphin's little son, with whose education hitherto his father had intrusted me.
15th August, 1685. Mr. Boscawen came to visit us, along with my Lord Godolphin's little son, whose education his father had entrusted to me so far.
27th August, 1685. My daughter Elizabeth died of the smallpox, soon after having married a young man, nephew of Sir John Tippett, Surveyor of the Navy, and one of the Commissioners. The 30th, she was buried in the church at Deptford. Thus, in less than six months were we deprived of two children for our unworthiness and causes best known to God, whom I beseech from the bottom of my heart that he will give us grace to make that right use of all these chastisements, that we may become better, and entirely submit in all things to his infinitely wise disposal. Amen!
27th August, 1685. My daughter Elizabeth passed away from smallpox shortly after marrying a young man, who is the nephew of Sir John Tippett, Surveyor of the Navy, and one of the Commissioners. On the 30th, she was buried in the church at Deptford. Thus, in less than six months, we lost two children due to our unworthiness and for reasons known only to God, whom I sincerely ask from the depths of my heart to grant us the grace to properly respond to all these hardships, so we may improve and fully submit to His infinitely wise will in all things. Amen!
3d September, 1685. Lord Clarendon (Lord Privy Seal) wrote to let me know that the King being pleased to send him Lord-Lieutenant into Ireland, was also pleased to nominate me one of the Commissioners to[Pg 231] execute the office of Privy Seal during his Lieutenancy there, it behoving me to wait upon his Majesty to give him thanks for this great honor.
3rd September, 1685. Lord Clarendon (Lord Privy Seal) wrote to inform me that the King, pleased to send him as Lord-Lieutenant to Ireland, also nominated me as one of the Commissioners to[Pg 231] carry out the duties of Privy Seal during his time there, and I need to see the King to thank him for this great honor.
5th September, 1685. I accompanied his Lordship to Windsor (dining by the way of Sir Henry Capel's at Kew), where his Majesty receiving me with extraordinary kindness, I kissed his hand, I told him how sensible I was of his Majesty's gracious favor to me, that I would endeavor to serve him with all sincerity, diligence, and loyalty, not more out of my duty than inclination. He said he doubted not of it, and was glad he had the opportunity to show me the kindness he had for me. After this, came abundance of great men to give me joy.
5th September, 1685. I went with his Lordship to Windsor (we stopped to eat at Sir Henry Capel's in Kew), where his Majesty welcomed me with remarkable kindness. I kissed his hand and expressed how grateful I was for his gracious favor towards me, promising that I would do my best to serve him with complete sincerity, hard work, and loyalty, motivated not just by duty but also by my own desire. He assured me he had no doubts about it and was pleased to have the chance to show his kindness to me. After that, many dignitaries came to congratulate me.
6th September, 1685. Sunday. I went to prayer in the chapel, and heard Dr. Standish. The second sermon was preached by Dr. Creighton, on 1 Thess. iv. 11, persuading to unity and peace, and to be mindful of our own business, according to the advice of the apostle. Then I went to hear a Frenchman who preached before the King and Queen in that splendid chapel next St. George's Hall. Their Majesties going to mass, I withdrew to consider the stupendous painting of the Hall, which, both for the art and invention, deserve the inscription in honor of the painter, Signor Verrio. The history is Edward III. receiving the Black Prince, coming toward him in a Roman triumph. The whole roof is the history of St. George. The throne, the carvings, etc., are incomparable, and I think equal to any, and in many circumstances exceeding any, I have seen abroad.
6th September, 1685. Sunday. I went to pray in the chapel and listened to Dr. Standish. The second sermon was given by Dr. Creighton, based on 1 Thess. iv. 11, encouraging unity and peace, and to focus on our own affairs, as the Apostle advised. After that, I went to hear a Frenchman preach before the King and Queen in that magnificent chapel next to St. George's Hall. As Their Majesties went to mass, I stepped away to admire the stunning painting in the Hall, which is worthy of the painter’s honor, Signor Verrio, for its artistry and creativity. The scene depicts Edward III. receiving the Black Prince, who approaches him in a Roman triumph. The entire ceiling portrays the story of St. George. The throne, the carvings, and everything else are unmatched; I believe they are on par with the best I've seen abroad, and in many respects, they surpass them.
I dined at Lord Sunderland's, with (among others) Sir William Soames, designed Ambassador to Constantinople.
I had dinner at Lord Sunderland's, along with (among others) Sir William Soames, the appointed Ambassador to Constantinople.
About 6 o'clock came Sir Dudley and his brother Roger North, and brought the Great Seal from my Lord Keeper, who died the day before at his house in Oxfordshire. The King went immediately to council; everybody guessing who was most likely to succeed this great officer; most believing it could be no other than my Lord Chief Justice Jefferies, who had so vigorously prosecuted the late rebels, and was now gone the Western Circuit, to punish the rest that were secured in several counties, and was now near upon his return. I took my leave of his[Pg 232] Majesty, who spoke very graciously to me, and supping that night at Sir Stephen Fox's, I promised to dine there the next day.
At about 6 o'clock, Sir Dudley and his brother Roger North arrived with the Great Seal from my Lord Keeper, who had passed away the day before at his home in Oxfordshire. The King immediately called for a council, and everyone was speculating about who would likely succeed this important position; most believed it would be none other than my Lord Chief Justice Jefferies, who had vigorously prosecuted the recent rebels and was currently on the Western Circuit to punish those still detained in various counties, and was close to returning. I took my leave of his[Pg 232] Majesty, who spoke very kindly to me, and that night while having supper at Sir Stephen Fox's, I promised to have dinner there the next day.
15th September, 1685. I accompanied Mr. Pepys to Portsmouth, whither his Majesty was going the first time since his coming to the Crown, to see in what state the fortifications were. We took coach and six horses, late after dinner, yet got to Bagshot that night. While supper was making ready I went and made a visit to Mrs. Graham, some time maid of honor to the Queen Dowager, now wife to James Graham, Esq., of the privy purse to the King; her house being a walk in the forest, within a little quarter of a mile from Bagshot town. Very importunate she was that I would sup, and abide there that night; but, being obliged by my companion, I returned to our inn, after she had shown me her house, which was very commodious, and well furnished, as she was an excellent housewife, a prudent and virtuous lady. There is a park full of red deer about it. Her eldest son was now sick there of the smallpox, but in a likely way of recovery, and other of her children run about, and among the infected, which she said she let them do on purpose that they might while young pass that fatal disease she fancied they were to undergo one time or other, and that this would be the best: the severity of this cruel distemper so lately in my poor family confirming much of what she affirmed.
15th September, 1685. I went with Mr. Pepys to Portsmouth, where the King was visiting for the first time since taking the throne to check on the state of the fortifications. We took a coach with six horses and set off late after dinner, but we still reached Bagshot that night. While they were preparing supper, I visited Mrs. Graham, who had been a maid of honor to the Queen Dowager and is now married to James Graham, Esq., who manages the King's private purse. Her house is a short walk in the forest, just a quarter of a mile from Bagshot town. She insisted that I stay for supper and spend the night, but since I had to stick with my companion, I returned to our inn after she gave me a tour of her well-kept and nicely furnished home, as she was an excellent housewife and a wise and virtuous woman. There’s a park filled with red deer surrounding her house. Her eldest son was sick with smallpox but was expected to recover, while her other children were running around among the infected, which she allowed intentionally so they could get the disease early while they were young, believing it would be better for them in the long run. The severity of this cruel illness, so recently affecting my own family, supported much of what she said.
16th September, 1685. The next morning, setting out early, we arrived soon enough at Winchester to wait on the King, who was lodged at the Dean's (Dr. Meggot). I found very few with him besides my Lords Feversham, Arran, Newport, and the Bishop of Bath and Wells. His Majesty was discoursing with the bishops concerning miracles, and what strange things the Saludadors61 would do in Spain, as by creeping into heated[Pg 233] ovens without hurt, and that they had a black cross in the roof of their mouths, but yet were commonly notorious and profane wretches; upon which his Majesty further said, that he was so extremely difficult of miracles, for fear of being imposed upon, that if he should chance to see one himself, without some other witness, he should apprehend it a delusion of his senses. Then they spoke of the boy who was pretended to have a wanting leg restored him, so confidently asserted by Fr. de Santa Clara and others. To all of which the Bishop added a great miracle happening in Winchester to his certain knowledge, of a poor, miserably sick and decrepit child (as I remember long kept unbaptized) who immediately on his baptism, recovered; as also of the salutary effect of King Charles his Majesty's father's blood, in healing one that was blind.
16th September, 1685. The next morning, we set out early and arrived at Winchester in time to meet the King, who was staying at the Dean's (Dr. Meggot). I found very few people with him, other than my Lords Feversham, Arran, Newport, and the Bishop of Bath and Wells. His Majesty was discussing with the bishops about miracles and the amazing things the Saludadors61 would do in Spain, like crawling into hot ovens without getting hurt, and that they had a black cross in the roof of their mouths, yet were known to be notorious and profane people. His Majesty then mentioned that he was so skeptical about miracles, fearing he might be tricked, that if he were to witness one himself, without another witness, he would think it was an illusion of his senses. They then talked about a boy who was said to have had a missing leg restored, a claim strongly made by Fr. de Santa Clara and others. The Bishop added a well-known miracle from Winchester, where a poor, miserably sick, and frail child (who I believe had long remained unbaptized) was healed immediately after baptism; he also mentioned the healing effect of King Charles, his Majesty's father's blood, which restored sight to someone who was blind.
There was something said of the second sight happening to some persons, especially Scotch; upon which his Majesty, and I think Lord Arran, told us that Monsieur ... a French nobleman, lately here in England, seeing the late Duke of Monmouth come into the playhouse at London, suddenly cried out to somebody sitting in the same box, "Voilà Monsieur comme il entre sans tete!" Afterward his Majesty spoke of some relics that had effected strange cures, particularly a piece of our blessed Savior's cross, that healed a gentleman's rotten nose by only touching. And speaking of the golden cross and chain taken out of the coffin of St. Edward the Confessor at Westminster, by one of the singing-men, who, as the scaffolds were taken down after his Majesty's coronation, espying a hole in the tomb, and something glisten, put his hand in, and brought it to the dean, and he to the King; his Majesty began to put the Bishop in mind how earnestly the late King (his brother) called upon him during his agony, to take out what he had in his pocket. "I had thought," said the King, "it had been for some keys, which might lead to some cabinet that his Majesty would[Pg 234] have me secure"; but, says he, "you will remember that I found nothing in any of his pockets but a cross of gold, and a few insignificant papers"; and thereupon he showed us the cross, and was pleased to put it into my hand. It was of gold, about three inches long, having on one side a crucifix enameled and embossed, the rest was graved and garnished with goldsmiths' work, and two pretty broad table amethysts (as I conceived), and at the bottom a pendant pearl; within was enchased a little fragment, as was thought, of the true cross, and a Latin inscription in gold and Roman letters. More company coming in, this discourse ended. I may not forget a resolution which his Majesty made, and had a little before entered upon it at the Council Board at Windsor or Whitehall, that the negroes in the plantations should all be baptized, exceedingly declaiming against that impiety of their masters prohibiting it, out of a mistaken opinion that they would be ipso facto free; but his Majesty persists in his resolution to have them christened, which piety the Bishop blessed him for.
There was talk about second sight occurring in some people, especially Scots. In response, his Majesty and I think Lord Arran mentioned that Monsieur... a French nobleman, recently in England, saw the late Duke of Monmouth enter the theater in London and suddenly shouted to someone sitting in the same box, "Look how he enters without a head!" Later, his Majesty talked about some relics that had caused strange healings, particularly a piece of our blessed Savior's cross that healed a man's rotten nose just by touching it. He also mentioned the golden cross and chain taken from the coffin of St. Edward the Confessor at Westminster, brought to the dean by one of the singing-men who, while the scaffolds were being taken down after his Majesty's coronation, spotted a hole in the tomb, saw something shiny, reached in, and brought it out. The dean then presented it to the King. His Majesty reminded the Bishop how earnestly the late King (his brother) pleaded with him during his last moments to take out what he had in his pocket. "I thought," said the King, "it was for some keys that might lead to some cabinet his Majesty wanted me to secure"; but he said, "you’ll remember that I found nothing in any of his pockets except a gold cross and a few insignificant papers." He then showed us the cross and kindly placed it in my hand. It was gold, about three inches long, with an enameled and embossed crucifix on one side, the rest was engraved and adorned with goldsmith work, and it had two nice broad amethysts (or so I guessed), and a dangling pearl at the bottom; inside, it held a small fragment believed to be from the true cross and a Latin inscription in gold and Roman letters. As more guests arrived, this conversation came to an end. I can't forget a decision his Majesty made, which he had recently discussed at the Council Board at Windsor or Whitehall, that all the enslaved people in the colonies should be baptized, strongly denouncing the wrongness of their masters prohibiting it out of a mistaken belief that they would be ipso facto free. But his Majesty was determined to have them baptized, and the Bishop praised him for that piety.
I went out to see the new palace the late King had begun, and brought almost to the covering. It is placed on the side of the hill, where formerly stood the old castle. It is a stately fabric, of three sides and a corridor, all built of brick, and cornished, windows and columns at the break and entrance of free-stone. It was intended for a hunting-house when his Majesty should come to these parts, and has an incomparable prospect. I believe there had already been £20,000 and more expended; but his now Majesty did not seem to encourage the finishing it at least for a while.
I went out to check out the new palace that the late King had started and almost finished. It's located on the hillside where the old castle used to be. It's an impressive structure with three sides and a corridor, all made of brick, featuring cornices, windows, and stone columns at the breaks and entrances. It was meant to be a hunting lodge for His Majesty when he visits this area, and it has an amazing view. I think over £20,000 had already been spent on it, but His current Majesty doesn’t seem interested in completing it for now.
Hence to see the Cathedral, a reverend pile, and in good repair. There are still the coffins of the six Saxon Kings, whose bones had been scattered by the sacrilegious rebels of 1641, in expectation, I suppose, of finding some valuable relics, and afterward gathered up again and put into new chests, which stand above the stalls of the choir.
Hence to see the Cathedral, a magnificent building, and well-maintained. The coffins of the six Saxon Kings are still there, whose bones had been scattered by the disrespectful rebels of 1641, probably hoping to find some valuable relics, and were later collected again and placed into new coffins, which stand above the stalls of the choir.
17th September, 1685. Early next morning, we went to Portsmouth, something before his Majesty arrived. We found all the road full of people, the women in their best dress, in expectation of seeing the King pass by, which he did, riding on horseback a good part of the[Pg 235] way. The Mayor and Aldermen with their mace, and in their formalities, were standing at the entrance of the fort, a mile on this side of the town, where the Mayor made a speech to the King, and then the guns of the fort were fired, as were those of the garrison, as soon as the King was come into Portsmouth. All the soldiers (near 3,000) were drawn up, and lining the streets and platform to God's House (the name of the Governor's residence), where, after he had viewed the new fortifications and shipyard, his Majesty was entertained at a magnificent dinner by Sir ... Slingsby, the Lieutenant Governor, all the gentlemen in his train sitting down at table with him, which I also had done, had I not been before engaged to Sir Robert Holmes, Governor of the Isle of Wight, to dine with him at a private house, where likewise we had a very sumptuous and plentiful repast of excellent venison, fowl, fish, and fruit.
17th September, 1685. Early the next morning, we went to Portsmouth a bit before the King arrived. The road was full of people, with women dressed in their best, excited to see the King pass by. He did, riding on horseback for a good part of the[Pg 235] way. The Mayor and Aldermen, with their mace and in their formal attire, were at the entrance of the fort, a mile from the town, where the Mayor gave a speech to the King. As soon as the King arrived in Portsmouth, the fort's guns were fired, along with those of the garrison. Nearly 3,000 soldiers lined the streets and the platform to God's House (the name of the Governor's residence). After reviewing the new fortifications and shipyard, the King was treated to a magnificent dinner by Sir ... Slingsby, the Lieutenant Governor, with all the gentlemen in his party seated at the table with him. I would have joined them, but I had already promised to dine with Sir Robert Holmes, Governor of the Isle of Wight, at a private house, where we also enjoyed a lavish and plentiful meal of excellent venison, fowl, fish, and fruit.
After dinner, I went to wait on his Majesty again, who was pulling on his boots in the Town Hall adjoining the house where he dined, and then having saluted some ladies, who came to kiss his hand, he took horse for Winchester, whither he returned that night. This hall is artificially hung round with arms of all sorts, like the hall and keep at Windsor. Hence, to see the shipyard and dock, the fortifications, and other things.
After dinner, I went to wait on His Majesty again, who was putting on his boots in the Town Hall next to the house where he dined. After greeting some ladies who came to kiss his hand, he mounted his horse to head for Winchester, where he returned that night. This hall is decorated with various arms, similar to the hall and keep at Windsor. From here, you can see the shipyard and dock, the fortifications, and other things.
Portsmouth, when finished, will be very strong, and a noble quay. There were now thirty-two men-of-war in the harbor. I was invited by Sir R. Beach, the Commissioner, where, after a great supper, Mr. Secretary and myself lay that night, and the next morning set out for Guildford, where we arrived in good hour, and so the day after to London.
Portsmouth, when completed, will be quite strong and have a grand quay. There are currently thirty-two warships in the harbor. I was invited by Sir R. Beach, the Commissioner, where, after a big dinner, Mr. Secretary and I stayed the night, and the next morning we headed out for Guildford, where we arrived at a good hour, and then the day after to London.
I had twice before been at Portsmouth, the Isle of Wight, etc., many years since. I found this part of Hampshire bravely wooded, especially about the house and estate of Colonel Norton, who though now in being, having formerly made his peace by means of Colonel Legg, was formerly a very fierce commander in the first Rebellion. His house is large, and standing low, on the road from Winchester to Portsmouth.
I had been to Portsmouth and the Isle of Wight twice before, many years ago. I found this area of Hampshire beautifully wooded, especially around Colonel Norton’s house and estate. Although he is still alive and made peace through Colonel Legg, he was once a fiercely commanding leader during the first Rebellion. His house is large and situated low along the road from Winchester to Portsmouth.
By what I observed in this journey, is that infinite industry, sedulity, gravity, and great understanding and[Pg 236] experience of affairs, in his Majesty, that I cannot but predict much happiness to the nation, as to its political government; and, if he so persist, there could be nothing more desired to accomplish our prosperity, but that he was of the national religion.
From what I saw during this journey, I believe that the King's endless hard work, dedication, seriousness, and strong understanding and experience in managing affairs make me predict great happiness for the nation in terms of its political leadership. If he continues like this, there’s nothing more we could wish for to achieve our prosperity, except that he followed the national religion.
30th September, 1685. Lord Clarendon's commission for Lieutenant of Ireland was sealed this day.
30th September, 1685. Lord Clarendon's commission for Lieutenant of Ireland was officially sealed today.
2d October, 1685. Having a letter sent me by Mr. Pepys with this expression at the foot of it, "I have something to show you that I may not have another time," and that I would not fail to dine with him. I accordingly went. After dinner, he had me and Mr. Houblon (a rich and considerable merchant, whose father had fled out of Flanders on the persecution of the Duke of Alva) into a private room, and told us that being lately alone with his Majesty, and upon some occasion of speaking concerning my late Lord Arlington dying a Roman Catholic, who had all along seemed to profess himself a Protestant, taken all the tests, etc., till the day (I think) of his death, his Majesty said that as to his inclinations he had known them long wavering, but from fear of losing his places, he did not think it convenient to declare himself. There are, says the King, those who believe the Church of Rome gives dispensations for going to church, and many like things, but that is not so; for if that might have been had, he himself had most reason to make use of it. Indeed, he said, as to SOME MATRIMONIAL CASES, THERE ARE NOW AND THEN DISPENSATIONS, but hardly in any cases else.
2nd October, 1685. I received a letter from Mr. Pepys with the note at the bottom saying, "I have something to show you that I may not have another time," and that I shouldn’t miss having dinner with him. So, I went. After dinner, he took me and Mr. Houblon (a wealthy and significant merchant whose father had fled Flanders during the persecution by the Duke of Alva) into a private room and told us that he had recently been alone with his Majesty. They were discussing my late Lord Arlington, who died a Roman Catholic but had always appeared to be a Protestant, taking all the tests, etc., until (I believe) the day of his death. His Majesty said that as far as his inclinations were concerned, he had known them to be uncertain for a long time, but out of fear of losing his positions, he didn't think it wise to declare himself. The King said that there are people who believe the Church of Rome grants dispensations for attending church and similar things, but that's not true; because if that were possible, he himself would have had the best reason to take advantage of it. Indeed, he said, in some matrimonial cases, there are occasionally dispensations, but hardly in any other cases.
This familiar discourse encouraged Mr. Pepys to beg of his Majesty, if he might ask it without offense, and for that his Majesty could not but observe how it was whispered among many whether his late Majesty had been reconciled to the Church of Rome; he again humbly besought his Majesty to pardon his presumption, if he had touched upon a thing which did not befit him to look into. The King ingenuously told him that he both was and died a Roman Catholic, and that he had not long since declared that it was upon some politic and state reasons, best known to himself (meaning the King his brother), but that he was of that persuasion: he bid him follow him into his closet, where opening a cabinet, he showed him two papers, containing about a quarter of a[Pg 237] sheet, on both sides written, in the late King's own hand, several arguments opposite to the doctrine of the Church of England, charging her with heresy, novelty, and the fanaticism of other Protestants, the chief whereof was, as I remember, our refusing to acknowledge the primacy and infallibility of the Church of Rome; how impossible it was that so many ages should never dispute it, till of late; how unlikely our Savior would leave his Church without a visible Head and guide to resort to, during his absence; with the like usual topic; so well penned as to the discourse as did by no means seem to me to have been put together by the late King yet written all with his own hand, blotted and interlined, so as, if indeed it was not given him by some priest, they might be such arguments and reasons as had been inculcated from time to time, and here recollected; and, in the conclusion, showing his looking on the Protestant religion (and by name the Church of England) to be without foundation, and consequently false and unsafe. When his Majesty had shown him these originals, he was pleased to lend him the copies of these two papers, attested at the bottom in four or five lines under his own hand.
This familiar conversation led Mr. Pepys to respectfully ask the King if he could bring up a delicate topic. He mentioned that it had been quietly discussed among many whether the late King had reconciled with the Roman Catholic Church. He humbly requested the King’s forgiveness if he was overstepping by addressing a matter he shouldn’t be probing into. The King openly told him that he was a Roman Catholic during his life and remained one in death. He explained that he had recently stated it was due to political and state reasons, known only to him and his brother, the King. The King asked Mr. Pepys to follow him into his private room, where he opened a cabinet and showed him two papers handwritten by the late King on both sides of a quarter of a sheet. These contained several arguments against the doctrines of the Church of England, accusing it of heresy, novelty, and the fanaticism of other Protestant sects. Among the main points was the refusal to acknowledge the authority and infallibility of the Roman Catholic Church, arguing how improbable it was that for so many centuries there had been no debate on this until recently, and how unlikely it was that our Savior would leave His Church without a visible leader during His absence. The writing was so well crafted that it didn’t seem to me to have been hastily assembled by the late King, yet it was all in his own handwriting, filled with corrections and annotations. If it wasn’t provided by some priest, then perhaps these were arguments he had heard repeatedly over time and had then gathered. In conclusion, he expressed his view that the Protestant religion, specifically the Church of England, was without a solid foundation and therefore false and perilous. After showing him these documents, the King kindly lent him copies of the two papers, signed by him at the bottom with four or five lines of attestation.
These were the papers I saw and read. This nice and curious passage I thought fit to set down. Though all the arguments and objections were altogether weak, and have a thousand times been answered by our divines; they are such as their priests insinuate among their proselytes, as if nothing were Catholic but the Church of Rome, no salvation out of that, no reformation sufferable, bottoming all their errors on St. Peter's successors' unerring dictatorship, but proving nothing with any reason, or taking notice of any objection which could be made against it. Here all was taken for granted, and upon it a resolution and preference implied.
These were the documents I saw and read. I thought this interesting passage was worth noting. Even though all the arguments and objections were weak and have been refuted countless times by our theologians; they are the kind of points that their priests suggest to their followers, as if the only true church is the Roman Catholic Church, with no salvation outside of it, and no acceptable reformation, basing all their mistakes on the unquestionable authority of St. Peter's successors, yet failing to prove anything logically or considering any counterarguments that could be made against it. Everything here was assumed, with a conclusion and preference implied.
I was heartily sorry to see all this, though it was no other than was to be suspected, by his late Majesty's too great indifference, neglect, and course of life, that he had been perverted, and for secular respects only professed to be of another belief, and thereby giving great advantage to our adversaries, both the Court and generally the youth and great persons of the nation becoming dissolute and highly profane. God was incensed to make his reign very troublesome and unprosperous, by wars, plagues, fires,[Pg 238] loss of reputation by an universal neglect of the public for the love of a voluptuous and sensual life, which a vicious Court had brought into credit. I think of it with sorrow and pity, when I consider how good and debonair a nature that unhappy Prince was; what opportunities he had to have made himself the most renowned King that ever swayed the British scepter, had he been firm to that Church for which his martyred and blessed father suffered; and had he been grateful to Almighty God, who so miraculously restored him, with so excellent a religion; had he endeavored to own and propagate it as he should have done, not only for the good of his kingdom, but of all the Reformed Churches in christendom, now weakened and near ruined through our remissness and suffering them to be supplanted, persecuted, and destroyed, as in France, which we took no notice of. The consequence of this, time will show, and I wish it may proceed no further. The emissaries and instruments of the Church of Rome will never rest till they have crushed the Church of England, as knowing that alone to be able to cope with them, and that they can never answer her fairly, but lie abundantly open to the irresistible force of her arguments, antiquity and purity of her doctrine, so that albeit it may move God, for the punishment of a nation so unworthy, to eclipse again the profession of her here, and darkness and superstition prevail, I am most confident the doctrine of the Church of England will never be extinguished, but remain visible, if not eminent, to the consummation of the world. I have innumerable reasons that confirm me in this opinion, which I forbear to mention here.
I was really sad to see all this, although it was just as we expected, given his late Majesty's strong indifference, neglect, and lifestyle. He had been misled, only pretending to follow a different belief for worldly reasons, which gave our enemies a significant advantage. Both the Court and the young people and influential figures of the nation became corrupt and extremely irreverent. God was angered, making his reign very troubled and unsuccessful, filled with wars, plagues, fires,[Pg 238] and a loss of reputation due to the public’s affection for a life of pleasure and indulgence, which a corrupt Court had popularized. I think about it with sadness and compassion when I reflect on how good-natured and kind that unfortunate Prince was; how much potential he had to become the most celebrated King to ever reign over Britain, had he stood firm for the Church for which his martyred father suffered. If he had been grateful to Almighty God, who so miraculously restored him to power with a wonderful religion; had he committed to supporting and spreading it as he should have, not only for the benefit of his kingdom but for all the Reformed Churches in Christendom, which are now weakened and nearly destroyed due to our negligence in allowing them to be supplanted, persecuted, and destroyed, as seen in France, which we ignored. The consequences of this will become clear over time, and I hope it doesn’t go any further. The agents and representatives of the Church of Rome will never stop until they have crushed the Church of England, knowing it’s the only one powerful enough to stand against them. They can never challenge her arguments honestly, but remain vulnerable to the undeniable strength of her principles, her history, and the purity of her doctrine. Even though God may allow the profession of her faith here to fade away again as darkness and superstition take over, I am very confident that the doctrine of the Church of England will never be extinguished; it will remain visible, if not prominent, until the end of the world. I have countless reasons that support my belief, which I will refrain from mentioning here.
In the meantime, as to the discourse of his Majesty with Mr. Pepys, and those papers, as I do exceedingly prefer his Majesty's free and ingenuous profession of what his own religion is, beyond concealment upon any politic accounts, so I think him of a most sincere and honest nature, one on whose word one may rely, and that he makes a conscience of what he promises, to perform it. In this confidence, I hope that the Church of England may yet subsist, and when it shall please God to open his eyes and turn his heart (for that is peculiarly in the Lord's hands) to flourish also. In all events, whatever does become of the Church of England, it is certainly, of[Pg 239] all the Christian professions on the earth, the most primitive, apostolical, and excellent.
In the meantime, regarding the conversation between His Majesty and Mr. Pepys, and those documents, I greatly appreciate His Majesty's straightforward and honest declaration of his own religion, without hiding it for political reasons. I believe he has a very sincere and genuine nature, someone you can trust, and he takes his commitments seriously. With this assurance, I hope that the Church of England can endure, and when it pleases God to enlighten him and change his heart (for that is solely in the Lord's control), it can thrive as well. In any case, regardless of what happens to the Church of England, it is undoubtedly the most ancient, apostolic, and remarkable of all the Christian denominations in the world.
8th October, 1685. I had my picture drawn this week by the famous Kneller.
8th October, 1685. I had my portrait painted this week by the renowned Kneller.
14th October, 1685. I went to London about finishing my lodgings at Whitehall.
14th October, 1685. I went to London to finish setting up my place at Whitehall.
15th October, 1685. Being the King's birthday, there was a solemn ball at Court, and before it music of instruments and voices. I happened by accident to stand the very next to the Queen and the King, who talked with me about the music.
15th October, 1685. Since it was the King's birthday, there was a formal ball at Court, accompanied by instrumental and vocal music beforehand. I happened to be standing right next to the Queen and the King, who chatted with me about the music.
18th October, 1685. The King was now building all that range from east to west by the court and garden to the street, and making a new chapel for the Queen, whose lodgings were to be in this new building, as also a new Council chamber and offices next the south end of the banqueting house. I returned home, next morning, to London.
18th October, 1685. The King was now constructing a structure that spanned from east to west, connecting the court and garden to the street, and building a new chapel for the Queen, whose accommodations would be in this new building, along with a new council chamber and offices next to the south end of the banqueting house. I returned home to London the next morning.
22d October, 1685. I accompanied my Lady Clarendon to her house at Swallowfield, in Berks, dining by the way at Mr. Graham's lodge at Bagshot; the house, newly repaired and capacious enough for a good family, stands in a park.
22nd October, 1685. I went with Lady Clarendon to her house in Swallowfield, Berks, and had dinner at Mr. Graham's lodge in Bagshot along the way; the house, recently renovated and spacious enough for a large family, is situated in a park.
Hence, we went to Swallowfield; this house is after the ancient building of honorable gentlemen's houses, when they kept up ancient hospitality, but the gardens and waters as elegant as it is possible to make a flat by art and industry, and no mean expense, my lady being so extraordinarily skilled in the flowery part, and my lord in diligence of planting; so that I have hardly seen a seat which shows more tokens of it than what is to be found here, not only in the delicious and rarest fruits of a garden, but in those innumerable timber trees in the ground about the seat, to the greatest ornament and benefit of the place. There is one orchard of 1,000 golden, and other cider pippins; walks and groves of elms, limes, oaks, and other trees. The garden is so beset with all manner of sweet shrubs, that it perfumes the air. The distribution also of the quarters, walks, and parterres, is excellent. The nurseries, kitchen-garden full of the most desirable plants; two very noble orangeries well furnished: but, above all, the canal and fish ponds, the one fed with a white, the other with a black running water, fed by a[Pg 240] quick and swift river, so well and plentifully stored with fish, that for pike, carp, bream, and tench, I never saw anything approaching it. We had at every meal carp and pike of a size fit for the table of a Prince, and what added to the delight was, to see the hundreds taken by the drag, out of which, the cook standing by, we pointed out what we had most mind to, and had carp that would have been worth at London twenty shillings a piece. The waters are flagged about with Calámus aromaticus, with which my lady has hung a closet, that retains the smell very perfectly. There is also a certain sweet willow and other exotics: also a very fine bowling-green, meadow, pasture, and wood; in a word, all that can render a country seat delightful. There is besides a well-furnished library in the house.
So, we went to Swallowfield; this house is like the classic residences of honorable gentlemen who practiced traditional hospitality, but the gardens and water features are as refined as possible, thanks to careful planning and significant investment. My lady is exceptionally talented with flowers, while my lord is diligent with planting. I’ve hardly seen a place that shows off its beauty more than here, not only with the delicious and rare fruits in the garden but also with the numerous trees around the property that greatly enhance its charm and value. There’s one orchard with 1,000 golden apples and other cider varieties; paths and groves of elm, lime, oak, and various other trees. The garden is filled with all sorts of fragrant shrubs that perfume the air. The layout of the spaces, paths, and flower beds is fantastic. The nurseries and kitchen garden are full of the most desirable plants; there are two elegant orange houses well-stocked, but above all, the canal and fish ponds are remarkable, one fed by a clear stream and the other by a dark running water source, supplied by a quick and swift river, which is so well and abundantly stocked with fish that I’ve never seen anything like it for pike, carp, bream, and tench. At every meal, we had carp and pike large enough for a prince’s table, and it added to our enjoyment to see the hundreds caught by the net. The cook stood by as we chose what we wanted, getting carp that would have been worth twenty shillings each in London. The waters are lined with Calámus aromaticus, which my lady has used to decorate a closet that holds the scent beautifully. There’s also a lovely sweet-smelling willow and other exotic plants, as well as a fine bowling green, meadow, pasture, and woods; in short, everything that makes a country home delightful. Additionally, there’s a well-stocked library in the house.
26th October, 1685. We returned to London, having been treated with all sorts of cheer and noble freedom by that most religious and virtuous lady. She was now preparing to go for Ireland with her husband, made Lord Deputy, and went to this country house and ancient seat of her father and family, to set things in order during her absence; but never were good people and neighbors more concerned than all the country (the poor especially) for the departure of this charitable woman; everyone was in tears, and she as unwilling to part from them. There was among them a maiden of primitive life, the daughter of a poor laboring man, who had sustained her parents (some time since dead) by her labor, and has for many years refused marriage, or to receive any assistance from the parish, besides the little hermitage my lady gives her rent-free; she lives on four pence a day, which she gets by spinning; says she abounds and can give alms to others, living in great humility and content, without any apparent affectation, or singularity; she is continually working, praying, or reading, gives a good account of her knowledge in religion, visits the sick; is not in the least given to talk; very modest, of a simple not unseemingly behavior; of a comely countenance, clad very plain, but clean and tight. In sum, she appears a saint of an extraordinary sort, in so religious a life, as is seldom met with in villages now-a-days.
26th October, 1685. We came back to London, having been treated to all kinds of hospitality and generous freedom by that incredibly devout and virtuous lady. She was getting ready to go to Ireland with her husband, who had been appointed Lord Deputy, and she went to this family estate to get things in order during her absence. But never have good people and neighbors been more saddened than everyone in the area (especially the poor) by the departure of this kind woman; everyone was in tears, and she was just as reluctant to leave them. Among them was a young woman living a simple life, the daughter of a poor laborer, who had supported her (now deceased) parents through her work. For many years, she had turned down marriage and refused any assistance from the parish, except for the small hermitage my lady provides her rent-free. She gets by on four pence a day from spinning, claiming she has plenty and can help others, living in great humility and contentment, without any sign of pretense or eccentricity. She is always working, praying, or reading, demonstrates a solid understanding of her faith, visits the sick, and hardly ever talks; she is very modest, with a straightforward yet appropriate demeanor, possessing a pleasant appearance, dressed simply but neat and tidy. In short, she seems like a remarkable saint, leading a devout life not often seen in villages these days.
27th October, 1685. I was invited to dine at Sir Stephen[Pg 241] Fox's with my Lord Lieutenant, where was such a dinner for variety of all things as I had seldom seen, and it was so for the trial of a master-cook whom Sir Stephen had recommended to go with his Lordship into Ireland; there were all the dainties not only of the season, but of what art could add, venison, plain solid meat, fowl, baked and boiled meats, banquet [dessert], in exceeding plenty, and exquisitely dressed. There also dined my Lord Ossory and Lady (the Duke of Beaufort's daughter), my Lady Treasurer, Lord Cornbury, and other visitors.
27th October, 1685. I was invited to dinner at Sir Stephen[Pg 241] Fox's with my Lord Lieutenant, where there was an amazing spread that I had rarely seen before. This dinner was also a trial for a master chef that Sir Stephen recommended to accompany his Lordship to Ireland. The table was filled with all the seasonal delicacies, as well as exquisite dishes made with artistic flair—venison, hearty meats, fowl, both baked and boiled dishes, and an abundance of desserts, all beautifully prepared. Joining us for dinner were my Lord Ossory and his wife (the Duke of Beaufort's daughter), my Lady Treasurer, Lord Cornbury, and other guests.
28th October, 1685. At the Royal Society, an urn full of bones was presented, dug up in a highway, while repairing it, in a field in Camberwell, in Surrey; it was found entire with its cover, among many others, believed to be truly Roman and ancient.
28th October, 1685. At the Royal Society, an urn filled with bones was presented, uncovered during the repairs of a highway in a field in Camberwell, Surrey; it was found intact with its lid, among many others, believed to be genuinely Roman and ancient.
Sir Richard Bulkeley described to us a model of a chariot he had invented, which it was not possible to overthrow in whatever uneven way it was drawn, giving us a wonderful relation of what it had performed in that kind, for ease, expedition, and safety; there were some inconveniences yet to be remedied—it would not contain more than one person; was ready to take fire every ten miles; and being placed and playing on no fewer than ten rollers, it made a most prodigious noise, almost intolerable. A remedy was to be sought for these inconveniences.
Sir Richard Bulkeley told us about a chariot he invented that couldn’t be tipped over, no matter how uneven the ground was. He gave us an amazing account of its performance in terms of ease, speed, and safety. However, there were still some issues that needed fixing—it could only carry one person, it was prone to catching fire every ten miles, and with ten rollers, it made an incredibly loud noise that was nearly unbearable. A solution needed to be found for these problems.
31st October, 1685. I dined at our great Lord Chancellor Jefferies', who used me with much respect. This was the late Chief-Justice who had newly been the Western Circuit to try the Monmouth conspirators, and had formerly done such severe justice among the obnoxious in Westminster Hall, for which his Majesty dignified him by creating him first a Baron, and now Lord Chancellor. He had some years past been conversant in Deptford; is of an assured and undaunted spirit, and has served the Court interest on all the hardiest occasions; is of nature cruel, and a slave of the Court.
31st October, 1685. I had dinner at the home of our esteemed Lord Chancellor Jefferies, who treated me with great respect. This was the former Chief Justice who had recently been on the Western Circuit to try the Monmouth conspirators and had previously delivered harsh justice among the undesirables in Westminster Hall, for which his Majesty honored him by elevating him first to Baron and now to Lord Chancellor. Some years ago, he had dealings in Deptford; he has a confident and fearless spirit and has supported the Court's interests in all the toughest situations. He has a cruel nature and is a servant of the Court.
3d November, 1685. The French persecution of the Protestants raging with the utmost barbarity, exceeded even what the very heathens used: innumerable persons of the greatest birth and riches leaving all their earthly substance, and hardly escaping with their lives, dispersed through all the countries of Europe. The French tyrant[Pg 242] abrogated the Edict of Nantes which had been made in favor of them, and without any cause; on a sudden demolishing all their churches, banishing, imprisoning, and sending to the galleys all the ministers; plundering the common people, and exposing them to all sorts of barbarous usage by soldiers sent to ruin and prey on them; taking away their children; forcing people to the Mass, and then executing them as relapsers; they burnt their libraries, pillaged their goods, ate up their fields and substance, banished or sent the people to the galleys, and seized on their estates. There had now been numbered to pass through Geneva only (and that by stealth, for all the usual passages were strictly guarded by sea and land) 40,000 toward Switzerland. In Holland, Denmark, and all about Germany, were dispersed some hundred thousands; besides those in England, where, though multitudes of all degree sought for shelter and welcome as distressed Christians and confessors, they found least encouragement, by a fatality of the times we were fallen into, and the uncharitable indifference of such as should have embraced them; and I prey it be not laid to our charge. The famous Claude fled to Holland; Allix and several more came to London, and persons of great estates came over, who had forsaken all. France was almost dispeopled, the bankers so broken, that the tyrant's revenue was exceedingly diminished, manufactures ceased, and everybody there, save the Jesuits, abhorred what was done, nor did the Papists themselves approve it. What the further intention is, time will show; but doubtless portending some revolution.
3rd November, 1685. The French persecution of the Protestants was brutal, exceeding even the actions of the most savage of people: countless individuals of high birth and wealth left everything behind, barely escaping with their lives, and scattered throughout Europe. The French tyrant[Pg 242] revoked the Edict of Nantes, which had been created in their favor, without cause; suddenly destroying all their churches, banishing, imprisoning, and sending all the ministers to the galleys; looting the common people, and exposing them to all kinds of abuse by soldiers sent to loot and destroy them; taking their children; forcing people to attend Mass, then executing them as heretics; burning their libraries, pillaging their property, destroying their fields, banishing or sending people to the galleys, and seizing their estates. It was reported that 40,000 managed to sneak through Geneva alone (as all the usual routes were heavily guarded by sea and land) heading toward Switzerland. In Holland, Denmark, and across Germany, several hundred thousand were dispersed; in England, where many individuals from all walks of life sought refuge and welcome as distressed Christians and confessors, they found the least encouragement due to the unfortunate state of the times and the cold indifference of those who should have embraced them; I hope this is not held against us. The notable Claude fled to Holland; Allix and several others came to London, and wealthy individuals arrived who had left everything behind. France was nearly depopulated, the bankers were devastated, the tyrant's revenue sharply decreased, manufacturing halted, and everyone there, except the Jesuits, condemned what was happening, with even the Catholics themselves disapproving. What the further intentions are, time will reveal; but it undoubtedly suggests some significant change.
I was shown the harangue which the Bishop of Valentia on Rhone made in the name of the Clergy, celebrating the French King, as if he was a God, for persecuting the poor Protestants, with this expression in it, "That as his victory over heresy was greater than all the conquests of Alexander and Cæsar, it was but what was wished in England; and that God seemed to raise the French King to this power and magnanimous action, that he might be in capacity to assist in doing the same here." This paragraph is very bold and remarkable; several reflecting on Archbishop Usher's prophecy as now begun in France, and approaching the orthodox in all other reformed churches. One thing was much taken[Pg 243] notice of, that the "Gazettes" which were still constantly printed twice a week, informing us what was done all over Europe, never spoke of this wonderful proceeding in France; nor was any relation of it published by any, save what private letters and the persecuted fugitives brought. Whence this silence, I list not to conjecture; but it appeared very extraordinary in a Protestant country that we should know nothing of what Protestants suffered, while great collections were made for them in foreign places, more hospitable and Christian to appearance.
I was shown the speech that the Bishop of Valentia on Rhone made on behalf of the Clergy, praising the French King as if he were a God, for persecuting the poor Protestants. He stated that "his victory over heresy was greater than all the conquests of Alexander and Caesar, and that this was exactly what was wished for in England; and that God seemed to elevate the French King to this power and noble action, so he could help do the same here." This statement is very bold and striking; many are reflecting on Archbishop Usher's prophecy, which seems to be unfolding in France and impacting the orthodox in other reformed churches. One thing that caught attention is that the "Gazettes," which were still being printed twice a week, keeping us informed about events all over Europe, never mentioned this remarkable situation in France; nor was there any report published by anyone, except for private letters and those fleeing persecution. I won’t guess why there was this silence; it just seemed very strange in a Protestant country that we were unaware of what Protestants were enduring, while significant collections were being made for them in other places that appeared to be more hospitable and Christian.
5th November, 1685. It being an extraordinarily wet morning, and myself indisposed by a very great rheum, I did not go to church, to my very great sorrow, it being the first Gunpowder Conspiracy anniversary that had been kept now these eighty years under a prince of the Roman religion. Bonfires were forbidden on this day; what does this portend!
5th November, 1685. It was an incredibly rainy morning, and I was feeling unwell from a bad cold, so I didn’t go to church, which made me very sad, as it was the first anniversary of the Gunpowder Conspiracy that had been observed for eighty years under a prince of the Catholic faith. Bonfires were banned on this day; what does this mean!
9th November, 1685. Began the Parliament. The King in his speech required continuance of a standing force instead of a militia, and indemnity and dispensation to Popish officers from the Test; demands very unexpected and unpleasing to the Commons. He also required a supply of revenue, which they granted; but returned no thanks to the King for his speech, till farther consideration.
9th November, 1685. The Parliament started. In his speech, the King asked for a permanent military force instead of a militia, as well as immunity and exemption for Catholic officers from the Test; these requests were surprising and unwelcome to the Commons. He also asked for additional funding, which they agreed to, but they didn't thank the King for his speech until they had more time to think it over.
12th November, 1685. The Commons postponed finishing the bill for the Supply, to consider the Test, and Popish officers; this was carried but by one voice.
12th November, 1685. The Commons delayed completing the bill for the Supply to discuss the Test and Catholic officers; this passed by just one vote.
14th November, 1685. I dined at Lambeth, my Lord Archbishop carrying me with him in his barge; there were my Lord Deputy of Ireland, the Bishops of Ely and St. Asaph, Dr. Sherlock, and other divines; Sir William Hayward, Sir Paul Rycaut, etc.
14th November, 1685. I had dinner at Lambeth, and the Archbishop took me there in his barge; present were the Deputy of Ireland, the Bishops of Ely and St. Asaph, Dr. Sherlock, and other scholars; Sir William Hayward, Sir Paul Rycaut, and others.
20th November, 1685. The Parliament was adjourned to February, several both of Lords and Commons excepting against some passage of his Majesty's speech relating to the Test, and continuance of Popish officers in command. This was a great surprise in a Parliament which people believed would have complied in all things.
20th November, 1685. The Parliament was postponed until February, with several members from both the Lords and Commons objecting to parts of the King’s speech regarding the Test and the ongoing presence of Catholic officers in power. This came as a major surprise in a Parliament that many expected would agree to everything.
Popish pamphlets and pictures sold publicly; no books nor answers to them appearing till long after.
Popish pamphlets and pictures were sold openly; no books or responses to them came out until long after.
21st November, 1685. I resigned my trust for composing a difference between Mr. Thynn and his wife.[Pg 244]
21st November, 1685. I stepped down from my role in resolving the conflict between Mr. Thynn and his wife.[Pg 244]
22d November, 1685. Hitherto was a very wet, warm season.
22nd November, 1685. So far, it has been a very wet, warm season.
4th December, 1685. Lord Sunderland was declared President of the Council, and yet to hold his Secretary's place. The forces disposed into several quarters through the kingdom are very insolent, on which are great complaints.
4th December, 1685. Lord Sunderland was announced as President of the Council, while still keeping his position as Secretary. The troops stationed in various parts of the kingdom are behaving very arrogantly, which has led to numerous complaints.
Lord Brandon, tried for the late conspiracy, was condemned and pardoned; so was Lord Grey, his accuser and witness.
Lord Brandon, who was tried for the recent conspiracy, was found guilty and pardoned; the same goes for Lord Grey, his accuser and witness.
Persecution in France raging, the French insolently visit our vessels, and take away the fugitive Protestants; some escape in barrels.
Persecution in France is rampant, and the French boldly board our ships to take away the fleeing Protestants; some manage to escape in barrels.
10th December, 1685. To Greenwich, being put into the new Commission of Sewers.
10th December, 1685. Went to Greenwich after being appointed to the new Commission of Sewers.
13th December, 1685. Dr. Patrick, Dean of Peterborough, preached at Whitehall, before the Princess of Denmark, who, since his Majesty came to the Crown, always sat in the King's closet, and had the same bowings and ceremonies applied to the place where she was, as his Majesty had when there in person.
13th December, 1685. Dr. Patrick, Dean of Peterborough, preached at Whitehall in front of the Princess of Denmark, who, since the King took the throne, always sat in the King’s chamber and received the same bows and ceremonies directed at her space as the King did when he was there in person.
Dining at Mr. Pepys's, Dr. Slayer showed us an experiment of a wonderful nature, pouring first a very cold liquor into a glass, and superfusing on it another, to appearance cold and clear liquor also; it first produced a white cloud, then boiling, divers coruscations and actual flames of fire mingled with the liquor, which being a little shaken together, fixed divers suns and stars of real fire, perfectly globular, on the sides of the glass, and which there stuck like so many constellations, burning most vehemently, and resembling stars and heavenly bodies, and that for a long space. It seemed to exhibit a theory of the eduction of light out of the chaos, and the fixing or gathering of the universal light into luminous bodies. This matter, or phosphorus, was made out of human blood and urine, elucidating the vital flame, or heat in animal bodies. A very noble experiment!
Dining at Mr. Pepys's, Dr. Slayer showed us an amazing experiment. He first poured a very cold liquid into a glass and then carefully added another liquid that also looked cold and clear. This resulted in a white cloud forming, followed by boiling, various flashes of light, and actual flames mixing with the liquid. When shaken a bit, it created real, glowing orbs of fire that stuck to the sides of the glass, resembling a universe of stars and constellations, burning intensely and looking like celestial bodies for quite some time. It seemed to demonstrate a theory about how light emerges from chaos and how universal light collects into luminous entities. This substance, or phosphorus, was made from human blood and urine, highlighting the vital heat in living creatures. A truly remarkable experiment!
16th December, 1685. I accompanied my Lord-Lieutenant as far as St. Alban's, there going out of town with him near 200 coaches of all the great officers and nobility. The next morning taking leave, I returned to London.[Pg 245]
16th December, 1685. I went with my Lord-Lieutenant as far as St. Alban's, leaving town with him along with nearly 200 coaches filled with all the great officers and nobility. The next morning, after saying my goodbyes, I returned to London.[Pg 245]
18th December, 1685. I dined at the great entertainment his Majesty gave the Venetian Ambassadors, Signors Zenno and Justiniani, accompanied with ten more noble Venetians of their most illustrious families, Cornaro, Maccenigo, etc., who came to congratulate their Majesties coming to the Crown. The dinner was most magnificent and plentiful, at four tables, with music, kettledrums, and trumpets, which sounded upon a whistle at every health. The banquet [dessert] was twelve vast chargers piled up so high that those who sat one against another could hardly see each other. Of these sweetmeats, which doubtless were some days piling up in that exquisite manner, the Ambassadors touched not, but leaving them to the spectators who came out of curiosity to see the dinner, were exceedingly pleased to see in what a moment of time all that curious work was demolished, the comfitures voided, and the tables cleared. Thus his Majesty entertained them three days, which (for the table only) cost him £600, as the Clerk of the Greencloth (Sir William Boreman) assured me. Dinner ended, I saw their procession, or cavalcade, to Whitehall, innumerable coaches attending. The two Ambassadors had four coaches of their own, and fifty footmen (as I remember), besides other equipage as splendid as the occasion would permit, the Court being still in mourning. Thence, I went to the audience which they had in the Queen's presence chamber, the Banqueting House being full of goods and furniture till the galleries on the garden-side, council chamber, and new chapel, now in the building, were finished. They went to their audience in those plain black gowns and caps which they constantly wear in the city of Venice. I was invited to have accompanied the two Ambassadors in their coach to supper that night, returning now to their own lodgings, as no longer at the King's expense; but, being weary, I excused myself.
18th December, 1685. I had dinner at the grand event his Majesty hosted for the Venetian Ambassadors, Signors Zenno and Justiniani, along with ten other noble Venetians from their most distinguished families, like Cornaro, Maccenigo, etc., who came to congratulate their Majesties on ascending to the Crown. The dinner was incredibly lavish, spread across four tables, with music, kettledrums, and trumpets that sounded with every toast. The dessert was served on twelve enormous platters stacked so high that people sitting across from each other could hardly see one another. The Ambassadors didn't touch the sweets, which had undoubtedly taken days to arrange so beautifully; they left them for the onlookers who came out of curiosity to see the dinner and were very pleased to watch all that elaborate setup demolished in no time, the treats cleared away, and the tables tidied up. His Majesty entertained them for three days, which (just for the food) cost him £600, as the Clerk of the Greencloth (Sir William Boreman) confirmed to me. After dinner, I witnessed their procession, or cavalcade, to Whitehall, with countless coaches in tow. The two Ambassadors had four coaches of their own and around fifty footmen, if I remember correctly, along with other lavish gear suitable for the occasion, even though the Court was still in mourning. After that, I headed to the audience they had in the Queen's presence chamber, while the Banqueting House was filled with goods and furniture until the galleries on the garden side, council chamber, and new chapel, currently under construction, were finished. They went to their audience in the simple black gowns and caps they always wear in the city of Venice. I was invited to ride with the two Ambassadors in their coach for supper that night as they returned to their own lodgings since they were no longer at the King's expense; however, I declined as I was tired.
19th December, 1685. My Lord Treasurer made me dine with him, where I became acquainted with Monsieur Barillon, the French Ambassador, a learned and crafty advocate.
19th December, 1685. My Lord Treasurer invited me to dinner, where I met Monsieur Barillon, the French Ambassador, a knowledgeable and shrewd diplomat.
20th December, 1685. Dr. Turner, brother to the Bishop of Ely, and sometime tutor to my son, preached at Whitehall on Mark viii. 38, concerning the submission[Pg 246] of Christians to their persecutors, in which were some passages indiscreet enough, considering the time, and the rage of the inhuman French tyrant against the poor Protestants.
20th December, 1685. Dr. Turner, who is the brother of the Bishop of Ely and was once my son's tutor, preached at Whitehall on Mark viii. 38 about Christians submitting to their persecutors. Some parts of his sermon were quite reckless given the current situation and the fury of the cruel French tyrant towards the poor Protestants.
22d December, 1685. Our patent for executing the office of Privy Seal during the absence of the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, being this day sealed by the Lord Chancellor, we went afterward to St. James, where the Court then was on occasion of building at Whitehall; his Majesty delivered the seal to my Lord Tiviot and myself, the other Commissioners not being come, and then gave us his hand to kiss. There were the two Venetian Ambassadors and a world of company; among the rest the first Popish Nuncio that had been in England since the Reformation; so wonderfully were things changed, to the universal jealousy.
22nd December, 1685. Our official permission to act as Privy Seal during the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland's absence was sealed today by the Lord Chancellor. After that, we went to St. James, where the Court was gathered for the construction at Whitehall. His Majesty handed the seal to Lord Tiviot and me, as the other Commissioners had not yet arrived, and then he let us kiss his hand. There were two Venetian Ambassadors and a large crowd; among them was the first Catholic Nuncio in England since the Reformation, which highlighted how dramatically things had changed, causing widespread concern.
24th December, 1685. We were all three Commissioners sworn on our knees by the Clerk of the Crown, before my Lord Chancellor, three several oaths: allegiance, supremacy, and the oath belonging to the Lord Privy Seal, which last we took standing. After this, the Lord Chancellor invited us all to dinner, but it being Christmas eve we desired to be excused, intending at three in the afternoon to seal divers things which lay ready at the office; so attended by three of the Clerks of the Signet, we met and sealed. Among other things was a pardon to West, who being privy to the late conspiracy, had revealed the accomplices to save his own neck. There were also another pardon and two indenizations; and so agreeing to a fortnight's vacation, I returned home.
24th December, 1685. All three of us Commissioners took our oaths on our knees, administered by the Clerk of the Crown, in front of my Lord Chancellor. We took three different oaths: allegiance, supremacy, and the oath for the Lord Privy Seal, which we took while standing. After that, the Lord Chancellor invited us to dinner, but since it was Christmas Eve, we politely declined, planning to finalize several items at the office at three in the afternoon. So, joined by three of the Clerks of the Signet, we gathered and sealed various documents. Among them was a pardon for West, who, knowing about the recent conspiracy, had disclosed the other conspirators to save himself. There were also another pardon and two indemnities; after agreeing to a two-week vacation, I headed home.
31st December, 1685. Recollecting the passages of the year past, and having made up accounts, humbly besought Almighty God to pardon those my sins which had provoked him to discompose my sorrowful family; that he would accept of our humiliation, and in his good time restore comfort to it. I also blessed God for all his undeserved mercies and preservations, begging the continuance of his grace and preservation. The winter had hitherto been extraordinarily wet and mild.
31st December, 1685. Reflecting on the events of the past year and having settled my accounts, I humbly asked Almighty God to forgive the sins that had caused distress in my sorrowful family; that He would accept our humility and, in His time, bring comfort back to us. I also expressed my gratitude to God for all His unmerited mercies and protections, asking for His continued grace and safety. The winter had been unusually wet and mild up to this point.
1st January, 1685-6. Imploring the continuance of God's providential care for the year now entered, I went to the public devotions. The Dean of the Chapel and Clerk of the Closet put out, viz, Bishop of London[Pg 247] and ..., and Rochester and Durham put in their places; the former had opposed the toleration intended, and shown a worthy zeal for the reformed religion as established.
1st January, 1685-6. Asking for God’s ongoing protection for the new year, I attended the public services. The Dean of the Chapel and the Clerk of the Closet were present, namely, the Bishop of London[Pg 247] and ..., while the Bishops of Rochester and Durham took their places; the former had opposed the intended toleration and demonstrated a commendable commitment to the established reformist faith.
6th January, 1686. I dined with the Archbishop of York, where was Peter Walsh, that Romish priest so well known for his moderation, professing the Church of England to be a true member of the Catholic Church. He is used to go to our public prayers without scruple, and did not acknowledge the Pope's infallibility, only primacy of order.
6th January, 1686. I had dinner with the Archbishop of York, where Peter Walsh, the well-known Catholic priest admired for his moderation, was present. He claims that the Church of England is a genuine part of the Catholic Church. He usually attends our public prayers without hesitation and doesn’t accept the Pope's infallibility, only his primacy of order.
19th January, 1686. Passed the Privy Seal, among others, the creation of Mrs. Sedley (concubine to ——) Countess of Dorchester, which the Queen took very grievously, so as for two dinners, standing near her, I observed she hardly ate one morsel, nor spoke one word to the King, or to any about her, though at other times she used to be extremely pleasant, full of discourse and good humor. The Roman Catholics were also very angry: because they had so long valued the sanctity of their religion and proselytes.
19th January, 1686. The Privy Seal was issued, which included the appointment of Mrs. Sedley (the mistress of ——) as Countess of Dorchester. The Queen was very upset about this; I noticed during two dinners when I was near her that she barely touched her food or spoke a word to the King or anyone else around her, even though she usually was quite cheerful and engaging. The Roman Catholics were also very angry because they had long valued the sanctity of their religion and their converts.
Dryden, the famous playwriter, and his two sons, and Mrs. Nelly (miss to the late ——), were said to go to mass; such proselytes were no great loss to the Church.
Dryden, the famous playwright, along with his two sons and Mrs. Nelly (miss to the late ——), were said to go to mass; such converts were not a big loss to the Church.
This night was burnt to the ground my Lord Montague's palace in Bloomsbury, than which for painting and furniture there was nothing more glorious in England. This happened by the negligence of a servant airing, as they call it, some of the goods by the fire in a moist season; indeed, so wet and mild a season had scarce been seen in man's memory.
This night, Lord Montague's palace in Bloomsbury was completely destroyed by fire, a place that was more glorious in its art and furnishings than anything else in England. This occurred because a servant carelessly placed some goods by the fire during a damp season; in fact, such a wet and mild season hadn't been seen in anyone's memory.
At this Seal there also passed the creation of Sir Henry Waldegrave to be a Peer. He had married one of the King's natural daughters by Mrs. Churchill. These two Seals my brother Commissioners passed in the morning before I came to town, at which I was not displeased. We likewise passed Privy Seals for £276,000 upon several accounts, pensions, guards, wardrobes, privy purse, etc., besides divers pardons, and one more which I must not forget (and which by Providence I was not present at) one Mr. Lytcott to be Secretary to the Ambassador to Rome. We being three Commissioners, any two were a quorum.[Pg 248]
At this Seal, they also approved Sir Henry Waldegrave's elevation to Peer. He had married one of the King’s natural daughters from Mrs. Churchill. My fellow Commissioners signed these two Seals in the morning before I arrived in town, which I was fine with. We also approved Privy Seals for £276,000 for various expenses, including pensions, guards, wardrobes, and the privy purse, among other things, in addition to several pardons, and one more that I must note (and thankfully I wasn't there for), appointing Mr. Lytcott as Secretary to the Ambassador to Rome. Since we were three Commissioners, any two made a quorum.[Pg 248]
21st January, 1686. I dined at my Lady Arlington's, Groom of the Stole to the Queen Dowager, at Somerset House, where dined the Countesses of Devonshire, Dover, etc.; in all eleven ladies of quality, no man but myself being there.
21st January, 1686. I had dinner at Lady Arlington's, the Groom of the Stole to the Queen Dowager, at Somerset House, where the Countesses of Devonshire, Dover, and others were present; in total, there were eleven ladies of high status, with no one but me as the sole man.
24th January, 1686. Unheard-of cruelties to the persecuted Protestants of France, such as hardly any age has seen the like, even among the Pagans.
24th January, 1686. Unimaginable cruelties to the persecuted Protestants of France, unlike anything seen in any age, even among the Pagans.
6th February, 1686. Being the day on which his Majesty began his reign, by order of Council it was to be solemnized with a particular office and sermon, which the Bishop of Ely preached at Whitehall on Numb. xi. 12; a Court oration upon the regal office. It was much wondered at, that this day, which was that of his late Majesty's death, should be kept as a festival, and not the day of the present King's coronation. It is said to have been formerly the custom, though not till now since the reign of King James I.
6th February, 1686. Since this was the day his Majesty started his reign, the Council ordered it to be celebrated with a special service and sermon, which the Bishop of Ely delivered at Whitehall on Numb. xi. 12; a royal address on the nature of kingship. It was quite surprising that this day, which marked the death of the previous Majesty, was observed as a celebration instead of the day of the current King's coronation. It is believed this had been the custom in the past, although it hadn't happened since the reign of King James I.
The Duchess of Monmouth, being in the same seat with me at church, appeared with a very sad and afflicted countenance.
The Duchess of Monmouth, sitting in the same pew as me at church, looked very sad and troubled.
8th February, 1686. I took the test in Westminster Hall, before the Lord Chief Justice. I now came to lodge at Whitehall, in the Lord Privy Seal's lodgings.
8th February, 1686. I took the test in Westminster Hall, in front of the Chief Justice. I then moved in at Whitehall, in the Lord Privy Seal's accommodations.
12th February, 1686. My great cause was heard by my Lord Chancellor, who granted me a rehearing. I had six eminent lawyers, my antagonist three, whereof one was the smooth-tongued solicitor, whom my Lord Chancellor reproved in great passion for a very small occasion. Blessed be God for his great goodness to me this day!
12th February, 1686. My major case was heard by my Lord Chancellor, who agreed to a rehearing. I had six top lawyers on my side, while my opponent had three, one of whom was the silver-tongued solicitor. My Lord Chancellor chastised him passionately for a minor issue. Thank God for His incredible kindness to me today!
19th February, 1686. Many bloody and notorious duels were fought about this time. The Duke of Grafton killed Mr. Stanley, brother to the Earl of [Derby], indeed upon an almost insufferable provocation. It is to be hoped that his Majesty will at last severely remedy this unchristian custom.
19th February, 1686. Many violent and infamous duels took place around this time. The Duke of Grafton killed Mr. Stanley, the brother of the Earl of [Derby], after what can only be described as an unbearable provocation. Hopefully, his Majesty will finally take serious action to put an end to this un-Christian practice.
Lord Sunderland was now Secretary of State, President of the Council, and Premier Minister.
Lord Sunderland was now the Secretary of State, the President of the Council, and the Prime Minister.
1st March, 1686. Came Sir Gilbert Gerrard to treat with me about his son's marrying my daughter, Susanna. The father being obnoxious, and in some suspicion and displeasure of the King, I would receive no proposal till[Pg 249] his Majesty had given me leave; which he was pleased to do; but, after several meetings we broke off, on his not being willing to secure anything competent for my daughter's children; besides that I found most of his estate was in the coal-pits as far off as Newcastle, and on leases from the Bishop of Durham, who had power to make concurrent leases, with other difficulties.
1st March, 1686. Sir Gilbert Gerrard came to discuss his son marrying my daughter, Susanna. Since the father was in a bit of trouble with the King and there were some suspicions about him, I refused to consider any proposal until[Pg 249] the King gave me permission, which he kindly did. However, after several meetings, we called it off because he was unwilling to secure anything substantial for my daughter's future children. Additionally, I discovered that most of his estate was tied up in coal pits as far away as Newcastle, and it was under leases from the Bishop of Durham, who had the authority to grant concurrent leases, among other complications.
7th March, 1686. Dr. Frampton, Bishop of Gloucester, preached on Psalm xliv. 17, 18, 19, showing the several afflictions of the Church of Christ from the primitive to this day, applying exceedingly to the present conjuncture, when many were wavering in their minds, and great temptations appearing through the favor now found by the Papists, so as the people were full of jealousies and discouragement. The Bishop magnified the Church of England, exhorting to constancy and perseverance.
7th March, 1686. Dr. Frampton, the Bishop of Gloucester, preached on Psalm 44:17-19, discussing the various struggles of the Church of Christ from its beginnings to today. His message was particularly relevant to the current situation, as many were uncertain and facing significant temptations due to the support the Papists were receiving. This led to feelings of jealousy and discouragement among the people. The Bishop praised the Church of England, encouraging everyone to remain steadfast and committed.
10th March, 1686. A Council of the Royal Society about disposing of Dr. Ray's book of Fishes, which was printed at the expense of the Society.
10th March, 1686. A Council of the Royal Society about deciding what to do with Dr. Ray's book of Fishes, which was printed at the Society's expense.
12th March, 1686. A docket was to be sealed, importing a lease of twenty-one years to one Hall, who styled himself his Majesty's printer (he lately turned Papist) for the printing missals, offices, lives of saints, portals, primers, etc., books expressly forbidden to be printed or sold, by divers Acts of Parliament; I refused to put my seal to it, making my exceptions, so it was laid by.
12th March, 1686. A document was set to be sealed, indicating a 21-year lease to someone named Hall, who called himself the King’s printer (he recently converted to Catholicism) for printing missals, religious services, biographies of saints, prayer books, etc., all of which were specifically prohibited from being printed or sold by various Acts of Parliament; I declined to seal it, stating my objections, so it was set aside.
14th March, 1686. The Bishop of Bath and Wells preached on John vi. 17, a most excellent and pathetic discourse: after he had recommended the duty of fasting and other penitential duties, he exhorted to constancy in the Protestant religion, detestation of the unheard-of cruelties of the French, and stirring up to a liberal contribution. This sermon was the more acceptable, as it was unexpected from a Bishop who had undergone the censure of being inclined to Popery, the contrary whereof no man could show more. This indeed did all our Bishops, to the disabusing and reproach of all their delators: for none were more zealous against Popery than they were.
14th March, 1686. The Bishop of Bath and Wells preached on John vi. 17, delivering a powerful and moving sermon. After discussing the importance of fasting and other acts of repentance, he encouraged steadfastness in the Protestant faith, denounced the shocking atrocities committed by the French, and urged generous donations. This sermon was particularly well-received since it was unexpected from a Bishop who had been criticized for being sympathetic to Catholicism, which no one could prove was the case. In fact, all our Bishops did their best to clear their names and dispel the accusations against them; none were more passionate in their opposition to Catholicism than they were.
16th March, 1686. I was at a review of the army about London in Hyde Park, about 6,000 horse and foot, in excellent order; his Majesty and infinity of people being present.[Pg 250]
16th March, 1686. I witnessed a review of the army near London in Hyde Park, with around 6,000 cavalry and infantry, all in great condition; His Majesty and countless spectators were present.[Pg 250]
17th March, 1686. I went to my house in the country, refusing to be present at what was to pass at the Privy Seal the next day. In the morning Dr. Tenison preached an incomparable discourse at Whitehall, on Timothy ii. 3, 4.
17th March, 1686. I went to my house in the country, choosing not to be present at what was going to happen at the Privy Seal the next day. In the morning, Dr. Tenison delivered an outstanding sermon at Whitehall, based on Timothy ii. 3, 4.
24th March, 1686. Dr. Cradock (Provost of Eaton) preached at the same place, on Psalm xlix. 13, showing the vanity of earthly enjoyments.
24th March, 1686. Dr. Cradock (Provost of Eaton) preached at the same place, on Psalm 49:13, discussing the emptiness of worldly pleasures.
28th March, 1686. Dr. White, Bishop of Peterborough, preached in a very eloquent style, on Matthew xxvi. 29, submission to the will of God on all accidents, and at all times.
28th March, 1686. Dr. White, Bishop of Peterborough, preached in a very eloquent style on Matthew 26:29, emphasizing the importance of submitting to God's will in all circumstances and at all times.
29th March, 1686. The Duke of Northumberland (a natural son of the late King by the Duchess of Cleveland) marrying very meanly, with the help of his brother Grafton, attempted in vain to spirit away his wife.
29th March, 1686. The Duke of Northumberland (the natural son of the late King and the Duchess of Cleveland) married in a very modest way and, with the help of his brother Grafton, tried unsuccessfully to run away with his wife.
A Brief was read in all churches for relieving the French Protestants, who came here for protection from the unheard-of cruelties of the King.
A brief was read in all churches to support the French Protestants who came here seeking protection from the unimaginable cruelty of the King.
2d April, 1686. Sir Edward Hales, a Papist, made Governor of Dover Castle.
2nd April, 1686. Sir Edward Hales, a Catholic, appointed Governor of Dover Castle.
15th April, 1686. The Archbishop of York now died of the smallpox, aged 62, a corpulent man. He was my special loving friend, and while Bishop of Rochester (from whence he was translated) my excellent neighbor. He was an inexpressible loss to the whole church, and that Province especially, being a learned, wise, stout, and most worthy prelate; I look on this as a great stroke to the poor Church of England, now in this defecting period.
15th April, 1686. The Archbishop of York has now died from smallpox at the age of 62. He was a heavy-set man. He was a dear friend of mine and, while Bishop of Rochester (from where he was promoted), he was an excellent neighbor. His loss is beyond words for the entire church, especially for that Province, as he was a learned, wise, strong, and truly worthy bishop. I see this as a significant blow to the struggling Church of England during this challenging time.
18th April, 1686. In the afternoon I went to Camberwell, to visit Dr. Parr. After sermon, I accompanied him to his house, where he showed me the Life and Letters of the late learned Primate of Armagh (Usher), and among them that letter of Bishop Bramhall's to the Primate, giving notice of the Popish practices to pervert this nation, by sending a hundred priests into England, who were to conform themselves to all sectaries and conditions for the more easily dispersing their doctrine among us. This letter was the cause of the whole impression being seized, upon pretense that it was a political or historical account of things not relating to theology, though it had been licensed by the Bishop; which[Pg 251] plainly showed what an interest the Papists now had,—that a Protestant book, containing the life and letters of so eminent a man, was not to be published. There were also many letters to and from most of the learned persons his correspondents in Europe. The book will, I doubt not, struggle through this unjust impediment.
18th April, 1686. In the afternoon, I went to Camberwell to visit Dr. Parr. After the sermon, I went with him to his house, where he showed me the Life and Letters of the late learned Primate of Armagh (Usher), including a letter from Bishop Bramhall to the Primate, warning about the Catholic practices aimed at misleading this nation by sending a hundred priests into England, who were to adapt to all sects and conditions in order to spread their teachings more easily among us. This letter led to the entire edition being seized, on the grounds that it was a political or historical account unrelated to theology, even though it had been approved by the Bishop; this[Pg 251] clearly showed how much influence the Catholics had—that a Protestant book containing the life and letters of such an important figure was not to be published. There were also many letters to and from most of his learned correspondents in Europe. I have no doubt this book will overcome this unfair obstacle.
Several Judges were put out, and new complying ones put in.
Several judges were removed, and new compliant ones were installed.
25th April, 1686. This day was read in our church the Brief for a collection for relief of the Protestant French so cruelly, barbarously, and inhumanly oppressed without any thing being laid to their charge. It had been long expected, and at last with difficulty procured to be published, the interest of the French Ambassador obstructing it.
25th April, 1686. Today in our church, we read the announcement for a collection to help the Protestant French who have been so cruelly, barbarically, and inhumanly oppressed without any charges against them. This had been anticipated for a long time and was finally published after much difficulty, as the French Ambassador's influence was blocking it.
5th May, 1686. There being a Seal, it was feared we should be required to pass a docket dispensing with Dr. Obadiah Walker and four more, whereof one was an apostate curate of Putney, the others officers of University College, Oxford, who hold their masterships, fellowships, and cures, and keep public schools, and enjoy all former emoluments, notwithstanding they no more frequented or used the public forms of prayers, or communion, with the Church of England, or took the Test or oaths of allegiance and supremacy, contrary to twenty Acts of Parliament; which dispensation being also contrary to his Majesty's own gracious declaration at the beginning of his reign, gave umbrage (as well it might) to every good Protestant; nor could we safely have passed it under the Privy Seal, wherefore it was done by immediate warrant, signed by Mr. Solicitor.
5th May, 1686. Since there was a Seal, we were concerned we might have to approve a document exempting Dr. Obadiah Walker and four others. One was a fallen curate from Putney, and the others were officials from University College, Oxford, who still held their positions, fellowships, and parish duties, running public schools and enjoying all their previous benefits, even though they no longer attended or participated in the public prayers or communion with the Church of England, nor did they take the Test or oaths of allegiance and supremacy, which went against twenty Acts of Parliament. This exemption also conflicted with the King's own gracious declaration at the start of his reign, which rightly upset every good Protestant; we couldn’t have approved it safely under the Privy Seal, so it was done by an immediate warrant, signed by Mr. Solicitor.
This Walker was a learned person, of a monkish life, to whose tuition I had more than thirty years since recommended the sons of my worthy friend, Mr. Hyldyard, of Horsley in Surrey, believing him to be far from what he proved—a hypocritical concealed Papist—by which he perverted the eldest son of Mr. Hyldyard, Sir Edward Hale's eldest son, and several more, to the great disturbance of the whole nation, as well as of the University, as by his now public defection appeared. All engines being now at work to bring in Popery, which God in mercy prevent!
This Walker was an educated man, living a monk-like life, to whom I had recommended, over thirty years ago, the sons of my good friend, Mr. Hyldyard, of Horsley in Surrey, believing him to be quite different from what he turned out to be—a hypocritical secret Catholic. Because of this, he led Mr. Hyldyard's eldest son, Sir Edward Hale's eldest son, and several others astray, causing significant unrest throughout the nation and the University, as his public betrayal now shows. Now, all efforts are being made to bring in Catholicism, which God, in His mercy, prevent!
This day was burned in the old Exchange, by the com[Pg 252]mon hangman, a translation of a book written by the famous Monsieur Claude, relating only matters of fact concerning the horrid massacres and barbarous proceedings of the French King against his Protestant subjects, without any refutation of any facts therein; so mighty a power and ascendant here had the French Ambassador, who was doubtless in great indignation at the pious and truly generous charity of all the nation, for the relief of those miserable sufferers who came over for shelter.
This day was marked in the old Exchange by the common hangman, a translation of a book written by the famous Monsieur Claude, detailing only factual events concerning the horrific massacres and brutal actions of the French King against his Protestant subjects, without any rebuttal to the facts presented; such was the overwhelming influence and power of the French Ambassador here, who was surely very angry at the compassionate and truly generous support from everyone in the country for the aid of those unfortunate victims who came seeking refuge.
About this time also, the Duke of Savoy, instigated by the French King to extirpate the Protestants of Piedmont, slew many thousands of those innocent people, so that there seemed to be an universal design to destroy all that would not go to mass, throughout Europe. Quod Avertat D. O. M.! No faith in Princes!
About this time, the Duke of Savoy, encouraged by the French King to eliminate the Protestants of Piedmont, killed many thousands of innocent people, as if there was a widespread plan to wipe out everyone who wouldn’t attend mass across Europe. Quod Avertat D. O. M.! No trust in princes!
12th May, 1686. I refused to put the Privy Seal to Doctor Walker's license for printing and publishing divers Popish books, of which I complained both to my Lord of Canterbury (with whom I went to advise in the Council Chamber), and to my Lord Treasurer that evening at his lodgings. My Lord of Canterbury's advice was, that I should follow my own conscience therein; Mr. Treasurer's, that if in conscience I could dispense with it, for any other hazard he believed there was none. Notwithstanding this, I persisted in my refusal.
12th May, 1686. I refused to authorize Doctor Walker's license for printing and publishing various Catholic books. I raised my concerns with my Lord of Canterbury (with whom I went to discuss it in the Council Chamber) and with my Lord Treasurer that evening at his place. My Lord of Canterbury advised me to follow my own conscience in this matter; Mr. Treasurer suggested that if I could set aside my conscience, he believed there were no other risks. Despite this, I still stuck to my refusal.
29th May, 1686. There was no sermon on this anniversary, as there usually had been ever since the reign of the present King.
29th May, 1686. There was no sermon on this anniversary, as there usually had been ever since the current King took the throne.
2d June, 1686. Such storms, rain, and foul weather, seldom known at this time of the year. The camp at Hounslow Heath, from sickness and other inconveniences of weather, forced to retire to quarters; the storms being succeeded by excessive hot weather, many grew sick. Great feasting there, especially in Lord Dunbarton's quarters. There were many jealousies and discourses of what was the meaning of this encampment.
2nd June, 1686. Such storms, rain, and terrible weather are rarely seen at this time of year. The camp at Hounslow Heath, due to illness and other weather problems, had to go back to quarters; the storms were followed by extremely hot weather, causing many to fall ill. There was a lot of feasting, especially in Lord Dunbarton's quarters. There were many suspicions and discussions about the purpose of this encampment.
A seal this day; mostly pardons and discharges of Knight Baronets' fees, which having been passed over for so many years, did greatly disoblige several families who had served his Majesty. Lord Tyrconnel gone to Ireland, with great powers and commissions, giving as much cause of talk as the camp, especially nineteen new Privy-Coun[Pg 253]cillors and Judges being now made, among which but three Protestants, and Tyrconnel made General.
A seal today; mostly for pardons and waivers of Knight Baronets' fees, which had been ignored for so many years, causing significant dissatisfaction among several families who had served his Majesty. Lord Tyrconnel has gone to Ireland with extensive powers and commissions, creating just as much discussion as the camp, especially with the appointment of nineteen new Privy Councillors and Judges, among which there are only three Protestants, and Tyrconnel has been made General.
New judges also here, among which was Milton, a Papist (brother to that Milton who wrote for the Regicides), who presumed to take his place without passing the Test. Scotland refused to grant liberty of mass to the Papists there.
New judges were also present, including Milton, a Catholic (brother of the Milton who wrote for the Regicides), who took his seat without passing the Test. Scotland denied the Catholics there the freedom to celebrate mass.
The French persecution more inhuman than ever. The Protestants in Savoy successfully resist the French dragoons sent to murder them.
The French persecution is more brutal than ever. The Protestants in Savoy successfully fend off the French soldiers sent to kill them.
The King's chief physician in Scotland apostatizing from the Protestant religion, does of his own accord publish his recantation at Edinburg.
The King's main doctor in Scotland renouncing the Protestant faith voluntarily announces his recantation in Edinburgh.
11th June, 1686. I went to see Middleton's receptacle of water at the New River, and the New Spa Wells near.
11th June, 1686. I went to check out Middleton's water reservoir at the New River and the nearby New Spa Wells.
20th June, 1686. An extraordinary season of violent and sudden rain. The camp still in tents.
20th June, 1686. An unusual period of intense and sudden rain. The camp remains in tents.
24th June, 1686. My Lord Treasurer settled my great business with Mr. Pretyman, to which I hope God will at last give a prosperous issue.
24th June, 1686. My Lord Treasurer finalized my significant matter with Mr. Pretyman, and I hope God will eventually grant a successful outcome.
25th June, 1686. Now his Majesty, beginning with Dr. Sharp and Tully, proceeded to silence and suspend divers excellent divines for preaching against Popery.
25th June, 1686. Now his Majesty, starting with Dr. Sharp and Tully, began to silence and suspend several excellent clergy for preaching against Catholicism.
27th June, 1686. I had this day been married thirty-nine years—blessed be God for all his mercies!
27th June, 1686. Today marks thirty-nine years since I got married—thank God for all his blessings!
The new very young Lord Chief-Justice Herbert declared on the bench, that the government of England was entirely in the King; that the Crown was absolute; that penal laws were powers lodged in the Crown to enable the King to force the execution of the law, but were not bars to bind the King's power; that he could pardon all offenses against the law, and forgive the penalties, and why could he not dispense with them; by which the Test was abolished? Everyone was astonished. Great jealousies as to what would be the end of these proceedings.
The young new Lord Chief Justice Herbert stated from the bench that the government of England was entirely in the hands of the King; that the Crown had absolute power; that penal laws were tools given to the Crown to ensure the enforcement of the law, but did not restrict the King's authority; that he could pardon any offenses against the law and waive the penalties, so why couldn't he just ignore them altogether? This led to the abolition of the Test. Everyone was shocked. There were significant concerns about what the outcome of these actions would be.
6th July, 1686. I supped with the Countess of Rochester, where was also the Duchess of Buckingham and Madame de Governè, whose daughter was married to the Marquis of Halifax's son. She made me a character of the French King and Dauphin, and of the persecution; that they kept much of the cruelties from the King's knowledge; that the Dauphin was so afraid of[Pg 254] his father, that he dared not let anything appear of his sentiments; that he hated letters and priests, spent all his time in hunting, and seemed to take no notice of what was passing.
6th July, 1686. I had dinner with the Countess of Rochester, who was joined by the Duchess of Buckingham and Madame de Governè, whose daughter was married to the son of the Marquis of Halifax. She described the French King and Dauphin, and the ongoing persecution; she said they kept many of the cruelties hidden from the King. The Dauphin was so scared of his father that he didn’t dare express his feelings; he hated writing and priests, spent all his time hunting, and seemed oblivious to what was happening around him.
This lady was of a great family and fortune, and had fled hither for refuge.
This woman came from a wealthy and prominent family and had escaped here for safety.
8th July, 1686. I waited on the Archbishop at Lambeth, where I dined and met the famous preacher and writer, Dr. Allix, doubtless a most excellent and learned person. The Archbishop and he spoke Latin together, and that very readily.
8th July, 1686. I visited the Archbishop at Lambeth, where I had lunch and met the famous preacher and writer, Dr. Allix, who is undoubtedly a very knowledgeable and impressive person. The Archbishop and he conversed in Latin quite fluently.
11th July, 1686. Dr. Meggot, Dean of Winchester preached before the household in St. George's Chapel at Windsor, the late King's glorious chapel now seized on by the mass priests. Dr. Cartwright, Dean of Ripon, preached before the great men of the Court in the same place.
11th July, 1686. Dr. Meggot, Dean of Winchester, preached to the household in St. George's Chapel at Windsor, the late King's magnificent chapel now taken over by the Catholic priests. Dr. Cartwright, Dean of Ripon, preached before the prominent figures of the Court in the same location.
We had now the sad news of the Bishop of Oxford's death, an extraordinary loss to the poor Church at this time. Many candidates for his Bishopric and Deanery, Dr. Parker, South, Aldrich, etc. Dr. Walker (now apostatizing) came to Court, and was doubtless very busy.
We just heard the sad news about the Bishop of Oxford's death, which is a huge loss for the struggling Church right now. Several candidates for his position and the Deanery, like Dr. Parker, South, Aldrich, and others, including Dr. Walker (who is now renouncing his faith), came to Court and were probably quite busy.
13th July, 1686. Note, that standing by the Queen at basset (cards), I observed that she was exceedingly concerned for the loss of £80; her outward affability much changed to stateliness, since she has been exalted.
13th July, 1686. Note that while I was standing by the Queen at basset (cards), I noticed she was really upset about losing £80; her friendly demeanor has shifted to being quite formal since she was elevated.
The season very rainy and inconvenient for the camps. His Majesty very cheerful.
The season is really rainy and not ideal for camping. His Majesty is in a great mood.
14th July, 1686. Was sealed at our office the constitution of certain commissioners to take upon them full power of all Ecclesiastical affairs, in as unlimited a manner, or rather greater, than the late High Commission-Court, abrogated by Parliament; for it had not only faculty to inspect and visit all Bishops' dioceses, but to change what laws and statutes they should think fit to alter among the colleges, though founded by private men; to punish, suspend, fine, etc., give oaths and call witnesses. The main drift was to suppress zealous preachers. In sum, it was the whole power of a Vicar-General—note the consequence! Of the clergy the commissioners were the Archbishop of Canterbury [Sancroft], Bishop of Durham [Crewe], and Rochester [Sprat]; of the Temporals, the Lord Treasurer, the Lord Chancellor [Jefferies][Pg 255] (who alone was ever to be of the quorum), the Chief justice [Herbert], and Lord President [Earl of Sunderland].
14th July, 1686. We set up at our office the constitution of certain commissioners who were given full power over all ecclesiastical affairs, in a way that was as broad, or even broader, than the recently abolished High Commission Court; for they had not only the authority to inspect and visit all Bishops' dioceses, but also to change any laws and statutes they thought necessary to alter among the colleges, even those founded by private individuals; to punish, suspend, fine, etc., administer oaths, and summon witnesses. The main goal was to suppress zealous preachers. In summary, it was the complete power of a Vicar-General—take note of the implications! Among the clergy, the commissioners included the Archbishop of Canterbury [Sancroft], the Bishop of Durham [Crewe], and Rochester [Sprat]; among the temporals, the Lord Treasurer, the Lord Chancellor [Jefferies] [Pg 255] (who would always be part of the quorum), the Chief Justice [Herbert], and the Lord President [Earl of Sunderland].
18th July, 1686. I went to see Sir John Chardin, at Greenwich.
18th July, 1686. I went to visit Sir John Chardin at Greenwich.
4th August, 1686. I dined at Signor Verrio's, the famous Italian painter, now settled in his Majesty's garden at St. James's, which he had made a very delicious paradise.
4th August, 1686. I had dinner at Signor Verrio's, the well-known Italian painter, who is now settled in the King’s garden at St. James's, which he has turned into a delightful paradise.
8th August, 1686. Our vicar gone to dispose of his country living in Rutlandshire, having St. Dunstan in the east given him by the Archbishop of Canterbury.
8th August, 1686. Our vicar has gone to settle his country living in Rutlandshire, having been given St. Dunstan in the East by the Archbishop of Canterbury.
I went to visit the Marquis Ravigné, now my neighbor at Greenwich, retired from the persecution in France. He was the deputy of all the Protestants of that kingdom in the parliament of Paris, and several times Ambassador in this and other Courts; a person of great learning and experience.
I went to visit the Marquis Ravigné, now my neighbor in Greenwich, who has retired from the persecution in France. He was the representative of all the Protestants in that kingdom in the Paris parliament and served as Ambassador several times in this and other courts; a person with great knowledge and experience.
8th September, 1686. Dr. Compton, Bishop of London, was on Monday suspended, on pretense of not silencing Dr. Sharp at St. Giles's, for something of a sermon in which he zealously reproved the doctrine of the Roman Catholics. The Bishop having consulted the civilians, they told him he could not by any law proceed against Dr. Sharp without producing witnesses, and impleaded according to form; but it was overruled by my Lord Chancellor, and the Bishop sentenced without so much as being heard to any purpose. This was thought a very extraordinary way of proceeding, and was universally resented, and so much the rather for that two Bishops, Durham and Rochester, sitting in the commission and giving their suffrages the Archbishop of Canterbury refused to sit among them. He was only suspended ab officio, and that was soon after taken off. He was brother to the Earl of Northampton, had once been a soldier, had traveled in Italy, but became a sober, grave, and excellent prelate.
8th September, 1686. Dr. Compton, Bishop of London, was suspended on Monday, supposedly for failing to silence Dr. Sharp at St. Giles's over a sermon where he passionately criticized Roman Catholic doctrine. After consulting lawyers, the Bishop learned he couldn't proceed against Dr. Sharp without presenting witnesses and following legal procedure, but my Lord Chancellor overruled this, and the Bishop was sentenced without even being given a chance to defend himself. This was seen as a very unusual way of handling the situation and was widely criticized, even more so because two Bishops, Durham and Rochester, were part of the commission and voted, while the Archbishop of Canterbury chose not to participate. He was only suspended from his duties, and that suspension was lifted soon after. He was the brother of the Earl of Northampton, had once been a soldier, traveled in Italy, but eventually became a sober, serious, and outstanding bishop.
12th September, 1686. Buda now taken from the Turks; a form of thanksgiving was ordered to be used in the (as yet remaining) Protestant chapels and church of Whitehall and Windsor.
12th September, 1686. Buda has now been captured from the Turks; a form of thanksgiving was ordered to be used in the (still existing) Protestant chapels and church of Whitehall and Windsor.
The King of Denmark was besieging Hamburg, no doubt by the French contrivance, to embroil the Protes[Pg 256]tant Princes in a new war, that Holland, etc., being engaged, matter for new quarrel might arise: the unheard-of persecution of the poor Protestants still raging more than ever.
The King of Denmark was laying siege to Hamburg, undoubtedly due to the French's scheme, to drag the Protestant Princes into a fresh war, while Holland, etc., was involved, creating a situation ripe for new conflicts: the extreme persecution of the poor Protestants was still intensifying more than ever.
22d September, 1686. The Danes retire from Hamburg, the Protestant Princes appearing for their succor, and the Emperor sending his minatories to the King of Denmark, and also requiring the restoration of the Duke of Saxe Gotha. Thus it pleased God to defeat the French designs, which were evidently to kindle a new war.
22nd September, 1686. The Danes pull back from Hamburg, with the Protestant Princes coming to their aid, and the Emperor sending his threats to the King of Denmark, while also demanding the return of the Duke of Saxe Gotha. In this way, it pleased God to thwart the French plans, which were clearly aimed at igniting a new war.
14th October, 1686. His Majesty's birthday; I was at his rising in his bedchamber, afterward in the park, where four companies of guards were drawn up. The officers, etc., wonderfully rich and gallant; they did not head their troops, but their next officers, the colonels being on horseback by the King while they marched. The ladies not less splendid at Court, where there was a ball at night; but small appearance of quality. All the shops both in the city and suburbs were shut up, and kept as solemnly as any holiday. Bonfires at night in Westminster, but forbidden in the city.
14th October, 1686. His Majesty's birthday; I was present when he got up in his bedroom, then later in the park, where four companies of guards were assembled. The officers and such were impressively wealthy and dashing; they didn’t lead their troops directly, but rather their immediate superiors, with the colonels on horseback alongside the King as they marched. The ladies looked just as splendid at Court, where there was a ball that night; however, there was a limited representation of high society. All the shops in both the city and suburbs were closed, observed with the seriousness of any holiday. There were bonfires at night in Westminster, but they were not allowed in the city.
17th October, 1686. Dr. Patrick, Dean of Peterborough, preached at Covent Garden Church on Ephes. v. 18, 19, showing the custom of the primitive saints in serving God with hymns, and their frequent use of them upon all occasions: touching the profane way of mirth and intemperance of this ungodly age. Afterward I visited my Lord Chief Justice of Ireland, with whom I had long and private discourse concerning the miserable condition that kingdom was like to be in, if Tyrconnel's counsel should prevail at Court.
17th October, 1686. Dr. Patrick, Dean of Peterborough, preached at Covent Garden Church on Ephesians 5:18-19, discussing how early saints worshipped God with hymns and used them often at all times, in contrast to the sinful way of partying and excess in this wicked age. Afterwards, I met with my Lord Chief Justice of Ireland, where we had a long and private conversation about the terrible state that kingdom would be in if Tyrconnel's advice succeeded at Court.
23d October, 1686. Went with the Countess of Sunderland to Cranbourne, a lodge and walk of my Lord Godolphin's in Windsor park. There was one room in the house spared in the pulling down the old one, because the late Duchess of York was born in it; the rest was built and added to it by Sir George Carteret, Treasurer of the Navy; and since, the whole was purchased by my Lord Godolphin, who spoke to me to go see it, and advise what trees were fit to be cut down to improve the dwelling, being environed with old rotten pollards, which corrupt the air. It stands on a knoll which though insensibly[Pg 257] rising, gives it a prospect over the Keep of Windsor, about three miles N. E. of it. The ground is clayey and moist; the water stark naught; the park is pretty; the house tolerable, and gardens convenient. After dinner, we came back to London, having two coaches both going and coming, of six horses apiece, which we changed at Hounslow.
23rd October, 1686. I went with the Countess of Sunderland to Cranbourne, a lodge and walking area of my Lord Godolphin's in Windsor Park. One room in the house was kept when the old one was taken down because the late Duchess of York was born there; the rest was built and added by Sir George Carteret, Treasurer of the Navy. Later, the whole place was bought by my Lord Godolphin, who asked me to come see it and give advice on which trees should be cut down to improve the living area, as it was surrounded by old, decaying pollards that polluted the air. It sits on a gradual rise that, although not obvious, provides a view over the Keep of Windsor, about three miles northeast of it. The ground is clayey and damp; the water is terrible; the park is lovely; the house is decent, and the gardens are nice. After dinner, we returned to London, using two coaches with six horses each, which we changed at Hounslow.
24th October, 1686. Dr. Warren preached before the Princess at Whitehall, on 5th Matthew, of the blessedness of the pure in heart, most elegantly describing the bliss of the beatifical vision. In the afternoon, Sir George Wheeler, knight and baronet, preached on the 4th Matt. upon the necessity of repentance, at St. Margaret's, an honest and devout discourse, and pretty tolerably performed. This gentleman coming from his travels out of Greece, fell in love with the daughter of Sir Thomas Higgins, his Majesty's resident at Venice, niece to the Earl of Bath, and married her. When they returned into England, being honored with knighthood, he would needs turn preacher, and took orders. He published a learned and ingenious book of his travels, and is a very worthy person, a little formal and particular, but exceedingly devout.
24th October, 1686. Dr. Warren preached before the Princess at Whitehall, focusing on Matthew 5, discussing the blessedness of the pure in heart and beautifully describing the joy of the beatific vision. In the afternoon, Sir George Wheeler, knight and baronet, preached on Matthew 4 about the necessity of repentance at St. Margaret's in a sincere and devout manner, reasonably well executed. This gentleman, who had returned from his travels in Greece, fell in love with the daughter of Sir Thomas Higgins, who served as his Majesty's resident in Venice and was the niece of the Earl of Bath, and married her. Upon returning to England and being honored with a knighthood, he decided to become a preacher and was ordained. He published a knowledgeable and insightful book about his travels and is a very respectable individual, somewhat formal and particular, but exceedingly devout.
27th October, 1686. There was a triumphant show of the Lord Mayor both by land and water, with much solemnity, when yet his power has been so much diminished, by the loss of the city's former charter.
27th October, 1686. There was a grand display of the Lord Mayor both on land and water, full of solemnity, even though his power has been greatly reduced by the loss of the city's previous charter.
5th November, 1686. I went to St. Martin's in the morning, where Dr. Birch preached very boldly against the Papists, from John xvi. 2. In the afternoon I heard Dr. Tillotson in Lincoln's Inn chapel, on the same text, but more cautiously.
5th November, 1686. I went to St. Martin's in the morning, where Dr. Birch preached quite boldly against the Catholics, from John 16:2. In the afternoon, I listened to Dr. Tillotson at Lincoln's Inn chapel, using the same text, but in a more careful manner.
16th November, 1686. I went with part of my family to pass the melancholy winter in London at my son's house in Arundel Buildings.
16th November, 1686. I went with some of my family to spend the gloomy winter in London at my son's house in Arundel Buildings.
5th December, 1686. I dined at my Lady Arlington's, Groom of the Stole to the Queen Dowager at Somerset House, where dined divers French noblemen, driven out of their country by the persecution.
5th December, 1686. I had dinner at my Lady Arlington's, Groom of the Stole to the Queen Dowager at Somerset House, where several French noblemen, who had been forced to leave their country due to persecution, also dined.
16th December, 1686. I carried the Countess of Sunderland to see the rarities of one Mr. Charlton in the Middle Temple, who showed us such a collection as I had never seen in all my travels abroad either of private[Pg 258] gentlemen, or princes. It consisted of miniatures, drawings, shells, insects, medals, natural things, animals (of which divers, I think 100, were kept in glasses of spirits of wine), minerals, precious stones, vessels, curiosities in amber, crystal, agate, etc.; all being very perfect and rare of their kind, especially his books of birds, fish, flowers, and shells, drawn and miniatured to the life. He told us that one book stood him in £300; it was painted by that excellent workman, whom the late Gaston, Duke of Orleans, employed. This gentleman's whole collection, gathered by himself, traveling over most parts of Europe, is estimated at £8,000. He appeared to be a modest and obliging person.62
16th December, 1686. I took the Countess of Sunderland to see the intriguing collection of a Mr. Charlton in the Middle Temple, who showed us a collection unlike anything I had encountered in all my travels abroad, whether with private individuals or royalty. It included miniatures, drawings, shells, insects, medals, natural items, animals (with around 100 of them preserved in jars of spirits), minerals, precious stones, vessels, and curiosities made of amber, crystal, agate, etc.; everything was exceptionally perfect and rare, particularly his books of birds, fish, flowers, and shells, all drawn and detailed to perfection. He mentioned that one book cost him £300; it was painted by that outstanding artist whom the late Gaston, Duke of Orleans, employed. This gentleman's entire collection, gathered by himself while traveling throughout most of Europe, is valued at £8,000. He seemed to be a humble and accommodating person.[Pg 258]
29th December, 1686. I went to hear the music of the Italians in the new chapel, now first opened publicly at Whitehall for the Popish Service. Nothing can be finer than the magnificent marble work and architecture at the end, where are four statues, representing St. John, St. Peter, St. Paul, and the Church, in white marble, the work of Mr. Gibbons, with all the carving and pillars of exquisite art and great cost. The altar piece is the Salutation; the volto in fresco, the Assumption of the blessed Virgin, according to their tradition, with our blessed Savior, and a world of figures painted by Verrio. The throne where the King and Queen sit is very glorious, in a closet above, just opposite to the altar. Here we saw the Bishop in his mitre and rich copes, with six or seven Jesuits and others in rich copes, sumptuously habited, often taking off and putting on the Bishop's mitre, who sat in a chair with arms pontifically, was adored and censed by three Jesuits in their copes; then he went to the altar and made divers cringes, then censing the images and glorious tabernacle placed on the altar, and now and then changing place: the crosier, which was of silver, was put into his hand with a world of mysterious ceremony, the music playing, with singing. I could not have believed I should ever have seen such things in the King of England's palace, after it had pleased God to enlighten this nation; but our great sin has, for the present, eclipsed the blessing, which I hope he will in mercy and his good time restore to its purity.[Pg 259]
29th December, 1686. I went to hear the Italian music in the newly opened chapel at Whitehall, now open to the public for the Catholic service. Nothing could be more impressive than the stunning marble work and architecture at the end, where there are four statues representing St. John, St. Peter, St. Paul, and the Church in white marble, crafted by Mr. Gibbons, with all the exquisite carvings and pillars made with great artistry and cost. The altar piece is the Salutation; the fresco shows the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin, as per their tradition, along with our Blessed Savior and a multitude of figures painted by Verrio. The throne where the King and Queen sit is truly magnificent, located in a small area above, directly across from the altar. Here, we saw the Bishop wearing his mitre and rich robes, accompanied by six or seven Jesuits and others in lavish attire, frequently taking off and putting on the Bishop's mitre, who sat in an ornate chair, was worshipped and censed by three Jesuits in their robes; then he went to the altar and performed various bowing gestures before censing the images and the magnificent tabernacle placed on the altar, occasionally changing positions: the silver crosier was given to him amidst a flurry of mysterious ceremonies, with the music playing and singing. I never thought I would witness such things in the palace of the King of England after God had chosen to enlighten this nation; however, our great sin has, for now, overshadowed the blessing, which I hope He will restore to its purity in His mercy and good time.[Pg 259]
Little appearance of any winter as yet.
Still no sign of winter.
1st January, 1686-87. Mr. Wake preached at St. Martin's on 1 Tim. iii. 16, concerning the mystery of godliness. He wrote excellently, in answer to the Bishop of Meaux.
1st January, 1686-87. Mr. Wake preached at St. Martin's on 1 Tim. iii. 16, about the mystery of godliness. He wrote exceptionally well in response to the Bishop of Meaux.
3d January, 1687. A Seal to confirm a gift of £4,000 per annum for 99 years to the Lord Treasurer out of the Post Office, and £1,700 per annum for ever out of Lord Grey's estate.
3rd January, 1687. A seal to confirm a gift of £4,000 per year for 99 years to the Lord Treasurer from the Post Office, and £1,700 per year indefinitely from Lord Grey's estate.
There was now another change of the great officers. The Treasury was put into commission, two professed Papists among them, viz, Lords Bellasis and Dover, joined with the old ones, Lord Godolphin, Sir Stephen Fox, and Sir John Ernley.
There was now another change of the top officials. The Treasury was put into commission, with two known Catholics among them, namely, Lords Bellasis and Dover, alongside the existing members, Lord Godolphin, Sir Stephen Fox, and Sir John Ernley.
17th January, 1687. Much expectation of several great men declaring themselves Papists. Lord Tyrconnel gone to succeed the Lord-Lieutenant [Clarendon] in Ireland, to the astonishment of all sober men, and to the evident ruin of the Protestants in that kingdom, as well as of its great improvement going on. Much discourse that all the White Staff officers and others should be dismissed for adhering to their religion. Popish Justices of the Peace established in all counties, of the meanest of the people; Judges ignorant of the law, and perverting it—so furiously do the Jesuits drive, and even compel Princes to violent courses, and destruction of an excellent government both in Church and State. God of his infinite mercy open our eyes, and turn our hearts, and establish his truth with peace! The Lord Jesus defend his little flock, and preserve this threatened church and nation!
17th January, 1687. There is a lot of anticipation regarding several prominent figures revealing themselves as Catholics. Lord Tyrconnel has gone to take over from the Lord-Lieutenant [Clarendon] in Ireland, which has shocked everyone who values reason, and it’s clearly leading to the downfall of Protestants in that kingdom, as well as jeopardizing its significant progress. There’s a lot of talk about dismissing all the White Staff officers and others for staying true to their faith. Catholic Justices of the Peace are being appointed in every county, filled by the least qualified people; judges are ignorant of the law and are twisting it—such is the aggressive push of the Jesuits, who even force leaders into extreme actions that destroy a great government both in the Church and State. May God, in His infinite mercy, open our eyes, change our hearts, and establish His truth with peace! May the Lord Jesus protect His small flock and safeguard this vulnerable church and nation!
24th January, 1687. I saw the Queen's new apartment at Whitehall, with her new bed, the embroidery of which cost £3,000. The carving about the chimney piece, by Gibbons, is incomparable.
24th January, 1687. I saw the Queen's new room at Whitehall, with her new bed, which cost £3,000 for the embroidery. The carving around the fireplace, done by Gibbons, is unmatched.
30th January, 1687. I heard the famous eunuch, Cifaccio, sing in the new Popish chapel this afternoon; it was indeed very rare, and with great skill. He came over from Rome, esteemed one of the best voices in Italy. Much crowding—little devotion.
30th January, 1687. I heard the famous eunuch, Cifaccio, sing in the new Catholic chapel this afternoon; it was truly exceptional and performed with great skill. He came over from Rome, regarded as one of the best voices in Italy. Lots of people—little devotion.
27th February, 1687. Mr. Chetwin preached at Whitehall on Rom. i. 18, a very quaint, neat discourse of Moral righteousness.[Pg 260]
27th February, 1687. Mr. Chetwin preached at Whitehall on Rom. i. 18, a very interesting and polished talk about moral righteousness.[Pg 260]
2d March, 1687. Came out a proclamation for universal liberty of conscience in Scotland, and depensation from all tests and laws to the contrary, as also capacitating Papists to be chosen into all offices of trust. The mystery operates.
2nd March, 1687. A proclamation was issued for universal freedom of conscience in Scotland, removing all tests and laws against it, and also allowing Catholics to be appointed to any positions of trust. The mystery unfolds.
3d March, 1687. Dr. Meggott, Dean of Winchester, preached before the Princess of Denmark, on Matt. xiv. 23. In the afternoon, I went out of town to meet my Lord Clarendon, returning from Ireland.
3rd March, 1687. Dr. Meggott, Dean of Winchester, preached for the Princess of Denmark, on Matt. xiv. 23. In the afternoon, I left town to meet my Lord Clarendon, who was coming back from Ireland.
10th March, 1687. His Majesty sent for the Commissioners of the Privy Seal this morning into his bedchamber, and told us that though he had thought fit to dispose of the Seal into a single hand, yet he would so provide for us, as it should appear how well he accepted our faithful and loyal service with many gracious expressions to this effect; upon which we delivered the Seal into his hands. It was by all the world both hoped and expected, that he would have restored it to my Lord Clarendon; but they were astonished to see it given to Lord Arundel, of Wardour, a zealous Roman Catholic. Indeed it was very hard, and looked very unkindly, his Majesty (as my Lord Clarendon protested to me, on my going to visit him and long discoursing with him about the affairs of Ireland) finding not the least failure of duty in him during his government of that kingdom, so that his recall plainly appeared to be from the stronger influence of the Papists, who now got all the preferments.
10th March, 1687. The King summoned the Commissioners of the Privy Seal to his bedroom this morning and told us that although he had decided to assign the Seal to a single person, he would ensure we were taken care of, showing his appreciation for our faithful and loyal service with many kind words to that effect. After this, we handed the Seal over to him. Everyone expected that he would return it to Lord Clarendon, but they were shocked to see it given to Lord Arundel of Wardour, who is a devout Roman Catholic. Indeed, it seemed very unfair and unkind, as the King (as Lord Clarendon told me during my visit to discuss the situation in Ireland) found no fault in him throughout his leadership in that kingdom, making it clear that his removal was influenced by the Papists, who were now receiving all the appointments.
Most of the great officers, both in the Court and country, Lords and others, were dismissed, as they would not promise his Majesty their consent to the repeal of the test and penal statutes against Popish Recusants. To this end, most of the Parliament men were spoken to in his Majesty's closet, and such as refused, if in any place of office or trust, civil or military, were put out of their employments. This was a time of great trial; but hardly one of them assented, which put the Popish interest much backward. The English clergy everywhere preached boldly against their superstition and errors, and were wonderfully followed by the people. Not one considerable proselyte was made in all this time. The party were exceedingly put to the worst by the preaching and writing of the Protestants in many excellent treatises, evincing the doctrine and discipline of the reformed[Pg 261] religion, to the manifest disadvantage of their adversaries. To this did not a little contribute the sermon preached at Whitehall before the Princess of Denmark and a great crowd of people, and at least thirty of the greatest nobility, by Dr. Ken, Bishop of Bath and Wells, on John viii. 46 (the Gospel of the day), describing through his whole discourse the blasphemies, perfidy, wresting of Scripture, preference of tradition before it, spirit of persecution, superstition, legends, and fables of the Scribes and Pharisees, so that all the auditory understood his meaning of a parallel between them and the Romish priests, and their new Trent religion. He exhorted his audience to adhere to the written Word, and to persevere in the Faith taught in the Church of England, whose doctrine for Catholic and soundness he preferred to all the communities and churches of Christians in the world; concluding with a kind of prophecy, that whatever it suffered, it should after a short trial emerge to the confusion of her adversaries and the glory of God.
Most of the high-ranking officials, both in the Court and in the countryside, including Lords and others, were dismissed because they wouldn't promise the King their support for repealing the test and penal laws against Catholic Recusants. To achieve this, most of the Members of Parliament were privately consulted by the King, and those who refused, if they held any position of power or trust, either civil or military, were removed from their jobs. This was a challenging time; however, very few agreed, which setback the Catholic cause significantly. The English clergy everywhere preached boldly against their superstitions and errors, gaining strong support from the people. During this entire period, not a single noteworthy convert was made. The Catholics were seriously weakened by the preaching and writings of the Protestants in many excellent treatises that clearly demonstrated the beliefs and practices of the reformed religion, to the clear disadvantage of their opponents. A significant factor in this was a sermon delivered at Whitehall before the Princess of Denmark and a large crowd, including at least thirty members of the highest nobility, by Dr. Ken, Bishop of Bath and Wells, on John 8:46 (the Gospel of the day). He outlined throughout his entire sermon the blasphemies, deceit, misuse of Scripture, preference for tradition over it, spirit of persecution, superstition, legends, and fables of the Scribes and Pharisees, so that everyone present understood his comparison between them and the Roman priests and their new Trent religion. He encouraged his audience to hold fast to the written Word and remain steadfast in the Faith taught in the Church of England, whose teachings for their universality and soundness he preferred over all other Christian communities and churches in the world. He concluded with a kind of prophecy that whatever hardships it faced, it would, after a brief trial, emerge to the shame of its opponents and the glory of God.
I went this evening to see the order of the boys and children at Christ's Hospital. There were near 800 boys and girls so decently clad, cleanly lodged, so wholesomely fed, so admirably taught, some the mathematics, especially the forty of the late King's foundation, that I was delighted to see the progress some little youths of thirteen or fourteen years of age had made. I saw them at supper, visited their dormitories, and much admired the order, economy, and excellent government of this most charitable seminary. Some are taught for the Universities, others designed for seamen, all for trades and callings. The girls are instructed in all such work as becomes their sex and may fit them for good wives, mistresses, and to be a blessing to their generation. They sang a psalm before they sat down to supper in the great Hall, to an organ which played all the time, with such cheerful harmony, that it seemed to me a vision of angels. I came from the place with infinite satisfaction, having never seen a more noble, pious, and admirable charity. All these consisted of orphans only.63 The foundation was of that pious Prince King Edward VI., whose picture (held to be an original of Holbein)[Pg 262] is in the court where the Governors meet to consult on the affairs of the Hospital, and his statue in white marble stands in a niche of the wall below, as you go to the church, which is a modern, noble, and ample fabric. This foundation has had, and still has, many benefactors.
I went this evening to check out the order of the boys and children at Christ's Hospital. There were nearly 800 boys and girls, all nicely dressed, well housed, properly fed, and excellently educated, with some learning math, especially the forty from the late King's foundation. I was delighted to see the progress some young kids, around thirteen or fourteen years old, had made. I watched them at supper, visited their dorms, and was really impressed by the organization, management, and outstanding oversight of this truly charitable institution. Some are being prepared for universities, others for the sea, and all are being equipped for trades and professions. The girls are taught skills appropriate for their gender that will help them become good wives, household managers, and blessings to their communities. They sang a psalm before sitting down to supper in the Great Hall, accompanied by an organ that played the whole time, creating such cheerful harmony that it felt like a vision of angels. I left feeling incredibly satisfied, having never seen a more noble, pious, and admirable charity. All the children there were orphans only. 63 The foundation was established by the pious Prince King Edward VI., whose picture (believed to be an original by Holbein) [Pg 262] is in the courtyard where the Governors gather to discuss the Hospital's affairs. His statue in white marble stands in a niche in the wall as you head toward the church, which is a modern, grand, and spacious building. This foundation has had, and continues to have, many benefactors.
16th March, 1687. I saw a trial of those devilish, murdering, mischief doing engines called bombs, shot out of the mortar piece on Blackheath. The distance that they are cast, the destruction they make where they fall, is prodigious.
16th March, 1687. I witnessed a trial of those wicked, deadly, troublemaking devices called bombs, launched from the mortar on Blackheath. The distance they travel and the destruction they cause when they land is astounding.
20th March, 1687. The Bishop of Bath and Wells (Dr. Ken) preached at St. Martin's to a crowd of people not to be expressed, nor the wonderful eloquence of this admirable preacher; the text was Matt. xxvi. 36 to verse 40, describing the bitterness of our Blessed Savior's agony, the ardor of his love, the infinite obligations we have to imitate his patience and resignation; the means by watching against temptations, and over ourselves with fervent prayer to attain it, and the exceeding reward in the end. Upon all which he made most pathetical discourses. The Communion followed, at which I was participant. I afterward dined at Dr. Tenison's with the Bishop and that young, most learned, pious, and excellent preacher, Mr. Wake. In the afternoon, I went to hear Mr. Wake at the newly built church of St. Anne, on Mark viii. 34, upon the subject of taking up the cross, and strenuously behaving ourselves in time of persecution, as this now threatened to be.
20th March, 1687. The Bishop of Bath and Wells (Dr. Ken) preached at St. Martin's to an incredible crowd, showcasing the wonderful eloquence of this remarkable preacher; the text was Matt. xxvi. 36 to verse 40, describing the deep sorrow of our Blessed Savior's agony, the intensity of his love, and the immense obligation we have to emulate his patience and acceptance. He emphasized the importance of staying vigilant against temptations, and how fervent prayer can help us achieve this, along with the great rewards that await us in the end. He delivered moving discourse on all these points. The Communion followed, which I participated in. I later dined at Dr. Tenison's with the Bishop and that young, very learned, pious, and excellent preacher, Mr. Wake. In the afternoon, I went to hear Mr. Wake at the newly built church of St. Anne, where he spoke on Mark viii. 34, discussing the topic of taking up the cross and how to conduct ourselves courageously during times of persecution, which seemed to be imminent.
His Majesty again prorogued the Parliament, foreseeing it would not remit the laws against Papists, by the extraordinary zeal and bravery of its members, and the free renunciation of the great officers both in Court and state, who would not be prevailed with for any temporal concern.
His Majesty once more postponed the Parliament, anticipating that it would not relax the laws against Catholics, due to the exceptional dedication and courage of its members, and the complete refusal of the high-ranking officials in both the Court and the state, who would not be swayed by any worldly interests.
25th March, 1687. Good Friday. Dr. Tenison preached at St. Martin's on 1 Peter ii. 24. During the service, a man came into near the middle of the church, with his sword drawn, with several others in that posture; in this jealous time it put the congregation into great confusion, but it appeared to be one who fled for sanctuary, being pursued by bailiffs.
25th March, 1687. Good Friday. Dr. Tenison preached at St. Martin's on 1 Peter ii. 24. During the service, a man entered near the middle of the church with his sword drawn, along with several others in a similar stance. In this tense time, it caused a lot of confusion among the congregation, but it turned out he was someone seeking refuge, being chased by bailiffs.
8th April, 1687. I had a rehearing of my great cause[Pg 263] at the Chancery in Westminster Hall, having seven of the most learned Counsel, my adversary five, among which were the Attorney General and late Solicitor Finch, son to the Lord Chancellor Nottingham. The account was at last brought to one article of the surcharge, and referred to a Master. The cause lasted two hours and more.
8th April, 1687. I had a re-hearing of my important case[Pg 263] at the Chancery in Westminster Hall, with seven of the most knowledgeable lawyers on my side and five on the opposing side, including the Attorney General and the former Solicitor Finch, who is the son of Lord Chancellor Nottingham. In the end, the case was narrowed down to one issue regarding the excess charge and was sent to a Master. The hearing lasted over two hours.
10th April, 1687. In the last week there was issued a Dispensation from all obligations and tests, by which Dissenters and Papists especially had public liberty of exercising their several ways of worship, without incurring the penalty of the many Laws and Acts of Parliament to the contrary. This was purely obtained by the Papists, thinking thereby to ruin the Church of England, being now the only church which so admirably and strenuously opposed their superstition. There was a wonderful concourse of people at the Dissenters' meeting house in this parish, and the parish church [Deptford] left exceedingly thin. What this will end in, God Almighty only knows; but it looks like confusion, which I pray God avert.
10th April, 1687. Last week, a Dispensation was issued, freeing people from all obligations and tests. This allowed Dissenters and Catholics, in particular, to practice their various forms of worship publicly without facing penalties from the numerous laws and Acts of Parliament against them. This was mainly pushed through by Catholics, who hoped it would lead to the downfall of the Church of England, which had consistently and vigorously opposed their beliefs. There was a huge turnout at the Dissenters' meeting house in this parish, while the parish church [Deptford] was left with very few attendees. Only God Almighty knows how this will turn out; it seems like a recipe for chaos, which I pray God will prevent.
11th April, 1687. To London about my suit, some terms of accommodation being proposed.
11th April, 1687. Went to London regarding my case, as some terms for a settlement were suggested.
19th April, 1687. I heard the famous singer, Cifaccio, esteemed the best in Europe. Indeed, his holding out and delicateness in extending and loosing a note with incomparable softness and sweetness, was admirable; for the rest I found him a mere wanton, effeminate child, very coy, and proudly conceited, to my apprehension. He touched the harpsichord to his voice rarely well. This was before a select number of particular persons whom Mr. Pepys invited to his house; and this was obtained by particular favor and much difficulty, the Signor much disdaining to show his talent to any but princes.
19th April, 1687. I heard the famous singer, Cifaccio, who is considered the best in Europe. His ability to sustain and gently release a note with unmatched softness and sweetness was truly impressive; however, I found him to be a mere childish flirt, very coy and overly self-important, in my opinion. He played the harpsichord to accompany his singing exceptionally well. This performance was in front of a select group of people that Mr. Pepys invited to his house, and getting access to this event was a significant challenge because the Signor preferred to showcase his talent only to royalty.
24th April, 1687. At Greenwich, at the conclusion of the Church service, there was a French sermon preached after the use of the English Liturgy translated into French, to a congregation of about 100 French refugees, of whom Monsieur Ruvigny was the chief, and had obtained the use of the church, after the parish service was ended. The preacher pathetically exhorted to patience, constancy, and reliance on God amidst all their sufferings, and the infinite rewards to come.
24th April, 1687. At Greenwich, at the end of the church service, a French sermon was preached following the English Liturgy translated into French, to a congregation of about 100 French refugees, with Monsieur Ruvigny leading them, who had secured the use of the church after the parish service had ended. The preacher earnestly urged the congregation to be patient, steadfast, and to trust in God through all their hardships, emphasizing the great rewards that awaited them.
2d May, 1687. I dined with Mynheer Diskvelts, the Holland Ambassador, a prudent and worthy person.[Pg 264] There dined Lord Middleton, principal Secretary of State, Lord Pembroke, Lord Lumley, Lord Preston, Colonel Fitzpatrick, and Sir John Chardin. After dinner, the Ambassador discoursed of and deplored the stupid folly of our politics, in suffering the French to take Luxemburg, it being a place of the most concern to have been defended, for the interest not only of the Netherlands, but of England.
2nd May, 1687. I had dinner with Mr. Diskvelts, the Dutch Ambassador, a sensible and respectable man.[Pg 264] At the dinner were Lord Middleton, the chief Secretary of State, Lord Pembroke, Lord Lumley, Lord Preston, Colonel Fitzpatrick, and Sir John Chardin. After dinner, the Ambassador talked about and lamented the ridiculous stupidity of our politics in allowing the French to take Luxembourg, as it was crucial to defend for the interests not just of the Netherlands, but also of England.
12th May, 1687. To London. Lord Sunderland being Lord President and Secretary of State, was made Knight of the Garter and Prime favorite. This day there was such a storm of wind as had seldom happened, being a sort of hurricane. It kept the flood out of the Thames, so that people went on foot over several places above bridge. Also an earthquake in several places in England about the time of the storm.
12th May, 1687. To London. Lord Sunderland, serving as Lord President and Secretary of State, was appointed Knight of the Garter and became the Prime favorite. On this day, there was a fierce windstorm, almost like a hurricane, which kept the tide out of the Thames, allowing people to walk across several spots above the bridge. There was also an earthquake reported in various parts of England around the same time as the storm.
26th May, 1687. To London, about my agreement with Mr. Pretyman, after my tedious suit.
26th May, 1687. To London, regarding my deal with Mr. Pretyman, following my long pursuit.
2d June, 1687. I went to London, it having pleased his Majesty to grant me a Privy Seal for £6,000, for discharge of the debt I had been so many years persecuted for, it being indeed for money drawn over by my father-in-law, Sir R. Browne, during his residence in the Court of France, and so with a much greater sum due to Sir Richard from his Majesty; and now this part of the arrear being paid, there remains yet due to me, as executor of Sir Richard, above £6,500 more; but this determining an expensive Chancery suit has been so great a mercy and providence to me (through the kindness and friendship to me of Lord Godolphin, one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury,) that I do acknowledge it with all imaginable thanks to my gracious God.
2nd June, 1687. I went to London, as it pleased his Majesty to grant me a Privy Seal for £6,000, to settle the debt I had been pursued for all these years. It was actually for money drawn by my father-in-law, Sir R. Browne, while he was in the Court of France, and a much larger sum was owed to Sir Richard from his Majesty. Now that this part of the arrears has been paid, there’s still over £6,500 owed to me as the executor of Sir Richard. However, this resolution of an expensive Chancery suit has been such a blessing and act of providence for me (thanks to the kindness and friendship of Lord Godolphin, one of the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury), that I sincerely acknowledge it with immense gratitude to my gracious God.
6th June, 1687. I visited my Lady Pierpoint, daughter to Sir John Evelyn, of Deane [in Wilts], now widow of Mr. Pierpoint, and mother of the Earl of Kingston. She was now engaged in the marriage of my cousin, Evelyn Pierpoint, her second son.
6th June, 1687. I visited Lady Pierpoint, daughter of Sir John Evelyn of Deane [in Wilts], now a widow of Mr. Pierpoint and mother of the Earl of Kingston. She was currently involved in the wedding of my cousin, Evelyn Pierpoint, her second son.
There was about this time brought into the Downs a vast treasure, which was sunk in a Spanish galleon about forty-five years ago, somewhere near Hispaniola, or the Bahama islands, and was now weighed up by some gentlemen, who were at the charge of divers, etc., to the[Pg 265] enriching them beyond all expectation. The Duke of Albemarle's share [Governor of Jamaica] came to, I believe, £50,000. Some private gentlemen who adventured £100, gained from £8,000 to £10,000. His Majesty's tenth was £10,000.
Around this time, a huge treasure was brought to the Downs, which had been sunk in a Spanish galleon about forty-five years earlier, somewhere near Hispaniola or the Bahamas. It was recently recovered by some gentlemen who paid for divers and other expenses, enriching them beyond their wildest dreams. The Duke of Albemarle's share [Governor of Jamaica] amounted to, I believe, £50,000. Some private investors who put in £100 made between £8,000 and £10,000. His Majesty's tenth was £10,000.
The Camp was now again pitched at Hounslow, the Commanders profusely vying in the expense and magnificence of tents.
The camp was set up again at Hounslow, with the commanders competing lavishly in their spending and the grandeur of their tents.
12th June, 1687. Our Vicar preached on 2 Peter ii. 21, upon the danger of relapsing into sin. After this, I went and heard M. Lamot, an eloquent French preacher at Greenwich, on Prov. xxx. 8, 9, a consolatory discourse to the poor and religious refugees who escaped out of France in the cruel persecution.
12th June, 1687. Our Vicar delivered a sermon on 2 Peter ii. 21, discussing the risks of falling back into sin. After that, I went to hear M. Lamot, a skilled French preacher at Greenwich, speak on Prov. xxx. 8, 9, offering an uplifting message to the poor and religious refugees who escaped the brutal persecution in France.
16th June, 1687. I went to Hampton Court to give his Majesty thanks for his late gracious favor, though it was but granting what was due. While I was in the Council Chamber, came in some persons, at the head of whom was a formal man with a large roll of parchment in his hand, being an Address (as he said, for he introduced it with a speech) of the people of Coventry, giving his Majesty their great acknowledgments for his granting a liberty of conscience; he added that this was not the application of one party only, but the unanimous address of Church of England men, Presbyterians, Independents, and Anabaptists, to show how extensive his Majesty's grace was, as taking in all parties to his indulgence and protection, which had removed all dissensions and animosities, which would not only unite them in bonds of Christian charity, but exceedingly encourage their future industry, to the improvement of trade, and spreading his Majesty's glory throughout the world; and that now he had given to God his empire, God would establish his; with expressions of great loyalty and submission; and so he gave the roll to the King, which being returned to him again, his Majesty caused him to read. The address was short, but much to the substance of the speech of their foreman, to whom the King, pulling off his hat, said that what he had done in giving liberty of conscience, was, what was ever his judgment ought to be done; and that, as he would preserve them in their enjoyment of it during his reign, so he would endeavor to settle it by law, that it should never be altered by his[Pg 266] successors. After this, he gave them his hand to kiss. It was reported the subscribers were above 1,000.
16th June, 1687. I went to Hampton Court to thank his Majesty for his recent favor, though it was just fulfilling what was right. While I was in the Council Chamber, some people came in, led by a formal man holding a large scroll of parchment, which he claimed was an Location (as he prefaced it with a speech) from the people of Coventry, expressing their deep gratitude for his granting of religious freedom. He added that this wasn’t just from one group, but was the unanimous request of Church of England members, Presbyterians, Independents, and Anabaptists, illustrating how broad his Majesty’s grace was, bringing all groups under his kindness and protection. This had eliminated all disputes and hostilities, which would not only bond them in Christian charity but also significantly boost their future efforts towards improving trade and spreading his Majesty's glory around the world. He also mentioned that now that he had given his empire to God, God would establish his reign, with expressions of great loyalty and submission; and then he handed the scroll to the King, which was returned to him. His Majesty had him read it. The address was brief, but closely mirrored the essence of their leader's speech, to which the King, removing his hat, said that what he had done by granting religious freedom was always his belief should be done; and that, while he would protect their enjoyment of it during his reign, he would strive to secure it by law so that it couldn’t be changed by his[Pg 266] successors. After this, he offered his hand to be kissed. It was reported that there were over 1,000 signatories.
But this is not so remarkable as an address of the week before (as I was assured by one present), of some of the Family of Love, His Majesty asked them what this worship consisted in, and how many their party might consist of; they told him their custom was to read the Scripture, and then to preach; but did not give any further account, only said that for the rest they were a sort of refined Quakers, but their number very small, not consisting, as they said, of above threescore in all, and those chiefly belonging to the Isle of Ely.
But this isn't as notable as a speech from the week before (as someone present confirmed), when some members of the Family of Love were asked by His Majesty what this worship was about and how many people were in their group. They explained that their practice involved reading Scripture and then preaching, but didn’t provide any more details. They simply mentioned that they were like a more refined version of the Quakers, but very few in number, claiming there were only about sixty in total, mostly from the Isle of Ely.
18th June, 1687. I dined at Mr. Blathwaite's (two miles from Hampton). This gentleman is Secretary of War, Clerk of the Council, etc., having raised himself by his industry from very moderate circumstances. He is a very proper, handsome person, very dexterous in business, and besides all this, has married a great fortune. His income by the Army, Council, and Secretary to the Committee of Foreign Plantations, brings him in above £2,000 per annum.
18th June, 1687. I had dinner at Mr. Blathwaite's (two miles from Hampton). This man is the Secretary of War, Clerk of the Council, and more, having worked his way up from very humble beginnings. He is a tall, good-looking guy, very skilled in his work, and on top of that, he has married into a significant fortune. His income from the Army, the Council, and as Secretary to the Committee of Foreign Plantations amounts to over £2,000 a year.
23d June, 1687. The Privy Seal for £6,000 was passed to me, so that this tedious affair was dispatched. Hitherto, a very windy and tempestuous summer. The French sermons to the refugees were continued at Greenwich Church.
23rd June, 1687. The Privy Seal for £6,000 was issued to me, so this long ordeal was finally resolved. Up until now, it has been a very windy and stormy summer. The French sermons for the refugees continued at Greenwich Church.
19th July, 1687. I went to Wotton. In the way, I dined at Ashted, with my Lady Mordaunt.
19th July, 1687. I went to Wotton. On the way, I had lunch at Ashted with my Lady Mordaunt.
5th August, 1687. I went to see Albury, now purchased by Mr. Finch (the King's Solicitor and son to the late Lord Chancellor); I found the garden which I first designed for the Duke of Norfolk, nothing improved.
5th August, 1687. I visited Albury, which has now been bought by Mr. Finch (the King's Solicitor and son of the late Lord Chancellor); I found the garden that I originally designed for the Duke of Norfolk had not changed at all.
15th August, 1687. I went to visit Lord Clarendon at Swallowfield, where was my Lord Cornbury just arrived from Denmark, whither he had accompanied the Prince of Denmark two months before, and now come back. The miserable tyranny under which that nation lives, he related to us; the King keeps them under an army of 40,000 men, all Germans, he not daring to trust his own subjects. Notwithstanding this, the Danes are exceedingly proud, the country very poor and miserable.
15th August, 1687. I went to visit Lord Clarendon at Swallowfield, where Lord Cornbury had just arrived from Denmark. He had accompanied the Prince of Denmark two months earlier and had now returned. He told us about the awful tyranny the nation suffers under; the King keeps them controlled with an army of 40,000 men, all Germans, as he doesn’t dare trust his own people. Despite this, the Danes are extremely proud, even though the country is very poor and miserable.
22d August, 1687. Returned home to Sayes Court from Wotton, having been five weeks absent with my brother[Pg 267] and friends, who entertained us very nobly. God be praised for his goodness, and this refreshment after my many troubles, and let his mercy and providence ever preserve me. Amen.
22nd August, 1687. I returned home to Sayes Court from Wotton, after being away for five weeks with my brother[Pg 267] and friends, who hosted us very generously. Thank God for His goodness, and for this respite after my many difficulties, and may His mercy and guidance always keep me safe. Amen.
3d September, 1687. The Lord Mayor sent me an Officer with a staff, to be one of the Governors of St. Thomas's Hospital.
3rd September, 1687. The Lord Mayor sent me an Officer with a staff to be one of the Governors of St. Thomas's Hospital.
Persecution raging in France; divers churches there fired by lightning, priests struck, consecrated hosts, etc., burnt and destroyed, both at St. Malos and Paris, at the grand procession on Corpus Christi day.
Persecution escalating in France; various churches there hit by lightning, priests injured, consecrated hosts, etc., burned and destroyed, both at St. Malo and Paris, during the big procession on Corpus Christi day.
13th September, 1687. I went to Lambeth, and dined with the Archbishop. After dinner, I retired into the library, which I found exceedingly improved; there are also divers rare manuscripts in a room apart.
13th September, 1687. I went to Lambeth and had lunch with the Archbishop. After lunch, I went into the library, which I found greatly improved; there are also several rare manuscripts in a separate room.
6th October, 1687. I was godfather to Sir John Chardin's son, christened at Greenwich Church, named John. The Earl of Bath and Countess of Carlisle, the other sponsors.
6th October, 1687. I was the godfather to Sir John Chardin's son, who was baptized at Greenwich Church and named John. The Earl of Bath and the Countess of Carlisle were the other sponsors.
29th October, 1687. An Anabaptist, a very odd ignorant person, a mechanic, I think, was Lord Mayor. The King and Queen, and Dadi, the Pope's Nuncio, invited to a feast at Guildhall. A strange turn of affairs, that those who scandalized the Church of England as favorers of Popery, should publicly invite an emissary from Rome, one who represented the very person of their Antichrist!
29th October, 1687. An Anabaptist, a rather strange and uneducated person, possibly a mechanic, was the Lord Mayor. The King and Queen, along with Dadi, the Pope's representative, were invited to a feast at Guildhall. It's quite odd that those who criticized the Church of England for supporting Catholicism would publicly invite someone from Rome, who represents the very embodiment of their Antichrist!
10th December, 1687. My son was returned out of Devon, where he had been on a commission from the Lords of the Treasury about a concealment of land.
10th December, 1687. My son has returned from Devon, where he was on a mission from the Lords of the Treasury regarding a land concealment.
20th December, 1687. I went with my Lord Chief-Justice Herbert, to see his house at Walton-on-Thames: it is a barren place. To a very ordinary house he had built a very handsome library, designing more building to it than the place deserves, in my opinion. He desired my advice about laying out his gardens, etc. The next day, we went to Weybridge, to see some pictures of the Duchess of Norfolk's, particularly the statue, or child in gremio, said to be of Michael Angelo; but there are reasons to think it rather a copy, from some proportion in the figures ill taken. It was now exposed to sale.
20th December, 1687. I went with my Lord Chief Justice Herbert to check out his house at Walton-on-Thames: it’s quite a barren spot. He had built a really nice library on an otherwise ordinary house, putting more effort into it than the place deserves, in my opinion. He asked for my advice on landscaping his gardens, etc. The next day, we headed to Weybridge to see some paintings of the Duchess of Norfolk’s, especially the statue or child in her arms, which is said to be by Michael Angelo; however, there are reasons to believe it’s more likely a copy due to some proportions in the figures that are off. It was now up for sale.
12th January, 1687-88. Mr. Slingsby, Master of the Mint, being under very deplorable circumstances on account of his creditors, and especially the King, I did my[Pg 268] endeavor with the Lords of the Treasury to be favorable to him.
12th January, 1687-88. Mr. Slingsby, Master of the Mint, was in a tough spot because of his creditors, particularly the King. I made my[Pg 268] best effort with the Lords of the Treasury to support him.
My Lord Arran, eldest son to the Duke of Hamilton, being now married to Lady Ann Spencer, eldest daughter of the Earl of Sunderland, Lord President of the Council, I and my family had most glorious favors sent us, the wedding being celebrated with extraordinary splendor.
My Lord Arran, the oldest son of the Duke of Hamilton, is now married to Lady Ann Spencer, the oldest daughter of the Earl of Sunderland, Lord President of the Council. My family and I received impressive favors, and the wedding was celebrated with amazing splendor.
15th January, 1688. There was a solemn and particular office used at our, and all the churches of London and ten miles round, for a thanksgiving to God, for her Majesty being with child.
15th January, 1688. There was a special and formal service held at our church and all the churches in London and within ten miles, to give thanks to God for her Majesty’s pregnancy.
22d January, 1688. This afternoon I went not to church, being employed on a religious treatise I had undertaken.
22nd January, 1688. This afternoon, I didn't go to church because I was working on a religious essay I had started.
Post annum 1588—1660—1688, Annus Mirabilis Tertius.64
After the years 1588—1660—1688, the Third Year of Wonders.64
30th January, 1688. Being the Martyrdom day of King Charles I., our curate made a florid oration against the murder of that excellent Prince, with an exhortation to obedience from the example of David; 1 Samuel xxvi. 6.
30th January, 1688. On the day of King Charles I.'s martyrdom, our curate gave an elaborate speech condemning the murder of that great prince and urged us to obey by citing the example of David; 1 Samuel xxvi. 6.
12th February, 1688. My daughter Evelyn going in the coach to visit in the city, a jolt (the door being not fast shut) flung her quite out in such manner, as the hind wheels passed over her a little above her knees. Yet it pleased God, besides the bruises of the wheels, she had no other harm. In two days she was able to walk, and soon after perfectly well; through God Almighty's great mercy to an excellent wife and a most dutiful and discreet daughter-in-law.
12th February, 1688. My daughter Evelyn was riding in the coach to visit someone in the city when a jolt (the door wasn't fully closed) threw her out in such a way that the back wheels ran over her just above her knees. Yet, it pleased God that, aside from the bruises from the wheels, she was not harmed in any other way. In two days, she was able to walk, and soon after, she was completely fine, thanks to God's great mercy, an excellent wife, and a very dutiful and sensible daughter-in-law.
17th February, 1688. I received the sad news of my niece Montague's death at Woodcot on the 15th.
17th February, 1688. I got the sad news of my niece Montague's death at Woodcot on the 15th.
15th March, 1688. I gave in my account about the sick and wounded, in order to have my quietus.
15th March, 1688. I submitted my report about the sick and injured, so I could settle my affairs.
23d March, 1688. Dr. Parker, Bishop of Oxford, who so lately published his extravagant treatise about transubstantiation, and for abrogating the test and penal laws, died. He was esteemed a violent, passionate, haughty man, but yet being pressed to declare for the Church of Rome, he utterly refused it. A remarkable end!
23rd March, 1688. Dr. Parker, Bishop of Oxford, who recently published his extreme treatise on transubstantiation and called for the repeal of the test and penal laws, passed away. He was regarded as a volatile, passionate, arrogant man, but when pressed to support the Church of Rome, he completely refused. A notable ending!
The French Tyrant now finding he could make no proselytes among those Protestants of quality, and others, whom he had caused to be shut up in dungeons, and[Pg 269] confined to nunneries and monasteries, gave them, after so long trial, a general releasement, and leave to go out of the kingdom, but utterly taking their estates and their children; so that great numbers came daily into England and other places, where they were received and relieved with very considerate Christian charity. This Providence and goodness of God to those who thus constantly held out, did so work upon those miserable poor souls who, to avoid the persecution, signed their renunciation, and to save their estates went to mass, that reflecting on what they had done, they grew so affected in their conscience, that not being able to support it, they in great numbers through all the French provinces, acquainted the magistrates and lieutenants that being sorry for their apostacy, they were resolved to return to their old religion; that they would go no more to mass, but peaceably assemble when they could, to beg pardon and worship God, but so without weapons as not to give the least umbrage of rebellion or sedition, imploring their pity and commiseration; and, accordingly, meeting so from time to time, the dragoon-missioners, Popish officers and priests, fell upon them, murdered and put them to death, whoever they could lay hold on; they without the least resistance embraced death, torture, or hanging, with singing psalms and praying for their persecutors to the last breath, yet still continuing the former assembling of themselves in desolate places, suffering with incredible constancy, that through God's mercy they might obtain pardon for this lapse. Such examples of Christian behavior have not been seen since the primitive persecutions; and doubtless God will do some signal work in the end, if we can with patience and resignation hold out, and depend on his Providence.
The French Dictator, realizing he couldn't win over the educated Protestants and others he had imprisoned in dungeons and [Pg 269] confined to nunneries and monasteries, finally decided to release them after such a long time and allowed them to leave the kingdom, but he took away their property and their children. As a result, many sought refuge in England and other places, where they were welcomed and supported with generous Christian charity. This kindness and protection from God toward those who remained steadfast encouraged many of the unfortunate souls who, to escape persecution, had renounced their faith and attended mass to save their belongings. Reflecting on their actions filled them with such remorse that they could no longer bear it. Thus, in large numbers throughout France, they informed the magistrates and officials that they regretted their betrayal and wished to return to their original faith. They would no longer attend mass but would gather peacefully when possible to seek forgiveness and worship God, unarmed and without any signs of rebellion or unrest, asking for compassion. However, during these peaceful gatherings, the dragoon-missioners, Catholic officers, and priests attacked them, killing anyone they could capture. Without any resistance, they faced death, torture, or hanging while singing psalms and praying for their persecutors until their last breath. They continued to meet in secluded places, enduring incredible suffering in hopes of receiving God's mercy and pardon for their lapse. Such displays of Christian behavior have not been seen since the early persecutions, and surely God will enact a significant change in the end if we can endure with patience and faith in His Providence.
24th March, 1688. I went with Sir Charles Littleton to Sheen, a house and estate given him by Lord Brounker; one who was ever noted for a hard, covetous, vicious man; but for his worldly craft and skill in gaming few exceeded him. Coming to die, he bequeathed all his land, house, furniture, etc., to Sir Charles, to whom he had no manner of relation, but an ancient friendship contracted at the famous siege of Colchester, forty years before. It is a pretty place, with fine gardens, and well planted, and given to one worthy of them, Sir Charles[Pg 270] being an honest gentleman and soldier. He is brother to Sir Henry Littleton of Worcestershire, whose great estate he is likely to inherit, his brother being without children. They are descendants of the great lawyer of that name, and give the same arms and motto. He is married to one Mrs. Temple, formerly maid of honor to the late Queen, a beautiful lady, and he has many fine children, so that none envy his good fortune.
24th March, 1688. I went with Sir Charles Littleton to Sheen, a house and estate given to him by Lord Brounker; a man who was always known for being hard, greedy, and immoral, but few could match his worldly cunning and skill in gambling. As he was nearing death, he left all his land, house, furniture, and more to Sir Charles, to whom he had no direct relation, only an old friendship formed during the famous siege of Colchester forty years earlier. It's a lovely place, with beautiful gardens and well-planted grounds, given to someone deserving, as Sir Charles is an honest gentleman and soldier. He is the brother of Sir Henry Littleton from Worcestershire, whose large estate he is likely to inherit since his brother has no children. They are descendants of the great lawyer of that name and carry the same coat of arms and motto. He is married to Mrs. Temple, a former maid of honor to the late Queen, a beautiful woman, and they have many fine children, so no one envies his good fortune.
After dinner, we went to see Sir William Temple's near to it; the most remarkable things are his orangery and gardens, where the wall-fruit-trees are most exquisitely nailed and trained, far better than I ever noted.
After dinner, we went to visit Sir William Temple's place nearby; the most notable features are his orangery and gardens, where the fruit trees on the walls are beautifully arranged and cared for, much better than I have ever seen.
There are many good pictures, especially of Vandyke's, in both these houses, and some few statues and small busts in the latter.
There are a lot of great paintings, especially by Vandyke, in both of these homes, as well as a few statues and small busts in the second one.
From thence to Kew, to visit Sir Henry Capel's, whose orangery and myrtetum are most beautiful and perfectly well kept. He was contriving very high palisadoes of reeds to shade his oranges during the summer, and painting those reeds in oil.
From there to Kew, to visit Sir Henry Capel's, whose orangery and myrtetum are really beautiful and perfectly maintained. He was designing very tall fences made of reeds to shade his orange trees during the summer and painting those reeds with oil.
1st April, 1688. In the morning, the first sermon was by Dr. Stillingfleet, Dean of St. Paul's (at Whitehall), on Luke x. 41, 42. The Holy Communion followed, but was so interrupted by the rude breaking in of multitudes zealous to hear the second sermon, to be preached by the Bishop of Bath and Wells, that the latter part of that holy office could hardly be heard, or the sacred elements be distributed without great trouble. The Princess being come, he preached on Mich. vii. 8, 9, 10, describing the calamity of the Reformed Church of Judah under the Babylonian persecution, for her sins, and God's delivery of her on her repentance; that as Judah emerged, so should the now Reformed Church, whenever insulted and persecuted. He preached with his accustomed action, zeal, and energy, so that people flocked from all quarters to hear him.
1st April, 1688. In the morning, Dr. Stillingfleet, Dean of St. Paul's, delivered the first sermon at Whitehall based on Luke 10:41-42. The Holy Communion followed, but it was disrupted by a large crowd eager to listen to the second sermon, which was to be given by the Bishop of Bath and Wells. This made it difficult to hear the latter part of the service or to distribute the sacred elements without considerable hassle. Once the Princess arrived, he preached on Micah 7:8-10, discussing the suffering of the Reformed Church of Judah during the Babylonian persecution due to its sins, and how God delivered her upon her repentance. He compared Judah's recovery to the current Reformed Church's potential revival in the face of insult and persecution. He preached with his usual passion, enthusiasm, and energy, drawing people from all around to listen to him.
15th April, 1688. A dry, cold, backward spring; easterly winds.
15th April, 1688. A dry, cold, late spring; easterly winds.
The persecution still raging in France, multitudes of Protestants, and many very considerable and great persons flying hither, produced a second general contribution, the Papists, by God's Providence, as yet making small progress among us.[Pg 271]
The ongoing persecution in France has caused many Protestants and several prominent individuals to flee here, resulting in a second widespread support effort, while the Papists, by God's providence, are still making limited progress among us.[Pg 271]
29th April, 1688. The weather was, till now, so cold and sharp, by an almost perpetual east wind, which had continued many months, that there was little appearance of any spring, and yet the winter was very favorable as to frost and snow.
29th April, 1688. The weather had been so cold and biting, due to an almost constant east wind that persisted for many months, that spring hardly seemed to be arriving, even though the winter had been quite mild in terms of frost and snow.
2d May, 1688. To London, about my petition for allowances upon the account of Commissioner for Sick and Wounded in the former war with Holland.
2nd May, 1688. To London, regarding my request for allowances related to my position as Commissioner for Sick and Wounded from the previous war with Holland.
8th May, 1688. His Majesty, alarmed by the great fleet of the Dutch (while we had a very inconsiderable one), went down to Chatham; their fleet was well prepared, and out, before we were in any readiness, or had any considerable number to have encountered them, had there been occasion, to the great reproach of the nation; while being in profound peace, there was a mighty land army, which there was no need of, and no force at sea, where only was the apprehension; but the army was doubtless kept and increased, in order to bring in and countenance Popery, the King beginning to discover his intention, by many instances pursued by the Jesuits, against his first resolution to alter nothing in the Church Establishment, so that it appeared there can be no reliance on Popish promises.
8th May, 1688. The King, worried about the large Dutch fleet (while we had a very small one), went down to Chatham; their fleet was well prepared and out at sea before we were ready or had enough forces to face them, if necessary, which was a huge embarrassment for the nation. While we were completely at peace, there was a huge land army that wasn’t needed, and no naval power, where only fear existed; however, the army was definitely being maintained and increased to support and promote Catholicism, as the King began to show his intentions through various actions pursued by the Jesuits, despite his initial resolve to change nothing in the Church Establishment. It became clear that we could not trust Catholic promises.
18th May, 1688. The King enjoining the ministers to read his Declaration for giving liberty of conscience (as it was styled) in all churches of England, this evening, six Bishops, Bath and Wells,65 Peterborough,66 Ely,67 Chichester,68 St. Asaph,69 and Bristol,70 in the name of all the rest of the Bishops, came to his Majesty to petition him, that he would not impose the reading of it to the several congregations within their dioceses; not that they were averse to the publishing it for want of due tenderness toward dissenters, in relation to whom they should be willing to come to such a temper as should be thought fit, when that matter might be considered and settled in Parliament and Convocation; but that, the Declaration being founded on such a dispensing power as might at pleasure set aside all laws ecclesiastical and civil, it appeared to them illegal, as it had done to the Parliament in 1661 and 1672, and that it was a point of such consequence, that they could not so far make themselves[Pg 272] parties to it, as the reading of it in church in time of divine service amounted to.
18th May, 1688. The King ordered the ministers to read his Declaration for granting freedom of conscience (as it was called) in all churches in England this evening. Six Bishops—Bath and Wells, Peterborough, Ely, Chichester, St. Asaph, and Bristol—acting on behalf of all the other Bishops, approached His Majesty to ask him not to require the reading of it to the congregations in their dioceses. They were not opposed to its publication out of a lack of care for dissenters; they would be open to finding a reasonable approach for that when it could be discussed and resolved in Parliament and Convocation. However, since the Declaration was based on a dispensing power that could potentially nullify all ecclesiastical and civil laws, they found it illegal, as Parliament had in 1661 and 1672. This issue was so significant that they could not support it to the extent that reading it in church during divine service would imply.
The King was so far incensed at this address, that he with threatening expressions commanded them to obey him in reading it at their perils, and so dismissed them.
The King was so angry at this statement that he threatened them and ordered them to read it at their own risk, and then he sent them away.
20th May, 1688. I went to Whitehall Chapel, where, after the morning lessons, the Declaration was read by one of the choir who used to read the chapters. I hear it was in the Abbey Church, Westminster, but almost universally forborne throughout all London: the consequences of which a little time will show.
20th May, 1688. I went to Whitehall Chapel, where, after the morning lessons, the Declaration was read by one of the choir members who usually reads the chapters. I hear it was in Westminster Abbey, but it was mostly avoided throughout all of London: the consequences of which we will see in a little while.
25th May, 1688. All the discourse now was about the Bishops refusing to read the injunction for the abolition of the Test, etc. It seems the injunction came so crudely from the Secretary's office, that it was neither sealed nor signed in form, nor had any lawyer been consulted, so as the Bishops who took all imaginable advice, put the Court to great difficulties how to proceed against them. Great were the consults, and a proclamation was expected all this day; but nothing was done. The action of the Bishops was universally applauded, and reconciled many adverse parties, Papists only excepted, who were now exceedingly perplexed, and violent courses were every moment expected. Report was, that the Protestant secular Lords and Nobility would abet the Clergy.
25th May, 1688. Everyone was talking about the Bishops refusing to read the order to abolish the Test, etc. It seems the order was issued so carelessly from the Secretary's office that it wasn’t properly sealed or signed, and no lawyer was consulted. As a result, the Bishops, who sought all possible advice, put the Court in a tough spot about how to handle them. There were numerous consultations, and a proclamation was anticipated throughout the day; however, nothing happened. The Bishops' actions were widely praised and brought together many opposing factions, except for the Catholics, who were now very confused, and extreme measures were expected at any moment. Reports suggested that the Protestant secular Lords and Nobility would support the Clergy.
The Queen Dowager, hitherto bent on her return into Portugal, now on the sudden, on allegation of a great debt owing her by his Majesty disabling her, declares her resolution to stay.
The Queen Dowager, who had been determined to return to Portugal, suddenly claims she will stay, citing a significant debt owed to her by the King that prevents her from leaving.
News arrived of the most prodigious earthquake that was almost ever heard of, subverting the city of Lima and country in Peru, with a dreadful inundation following it.
News came in about the most incredible earthquake ever recorded, which devastated the city of Lima and the entire country of Peru, followed by a terrifying flood.
8th June, 1688. This day, the Archbishop of Canterbury, with the Bishops of Ely, Chichester, St. Asaph, Bristol, Peterborough, and Bath and Wells, were sent from the Privy Council prisoners to the Tower, for refusing to give bail for their appearance, on their not reading the Declaration for liberty of conscience; they refused to give bail, as it would have prejudiced their peerage. The concern of the people for them was wonderful, infinite crowds on their knees begging their blessing, and praying for them, as they passed out of the barge along the Tower wharf.[Pg 273]
8th June, 1688. Today, the Archbishop of Canterbury, along with the Bishops of Ely, Chichester, St. Asaph, Bristol, Peterborough, and Bath and Wells, were sent from the Privy Council as prisoners to the Tower for refusing to post bail for their appearance after not reading the Declaration for liberty of conscience; they refused to post bail because it would have affected their noble status. The people's concern for them was incredible, with countless crowds on their knees seeking their blessing and praying for them as they made their way from the barge along the Tower wharf.[Pg 273]
10th June, 1688. A YOUNG PRINCE born, which will cause disputes.
10th June, 1688. A YOUNG PRINCE is born, which will lead to conflicts.
About two o'clock, we heard the Tower ordnance discharged, and the bells ring for the birth of a Prince of Wales. This was very surprising, it having been universally given out that her Majesty did not look till the next month.
About two o'clock, we heard the Tower guns fire and the bells ring for the birth of a Prince of Wales. This was quite surprising, as it had been widely announced that her Majesty wasn't due until next month.
13th June, 1688. I went to the Tower to see the Bishops, visited the Archbishop and the Bishops of Ely, St. Asaph, and Bath and Wells.
13th June, 1688. I went to the Tower to see the Bishops, visited the Archbishop and the Bishops of Ely, St. Asaph, and Bath and Wells.
14th June, 1688. Dined with the Lord Chancellor.
14th June, 1688. Had dinner with the Lord Chancellor.
15th June, 1688. Being the first day of term, the Bishops were brought to Westminster on habeas corpus, when the indictment was read, and they were called on to plead; their counsel objected that the warrant was illegal; but, after long debate, it was overruled, and they pleaded. The Court then offered to take bail for their appearance; but this they refused, and at last were dismissed on their own recognizances to appear that day fortnight; the Archbishop in £200, the Bishops in £100 each.
15th June, 1688. On the first day of the term, the Bishops were brought to Westminster on habeas corpus. The indictment was read, and they were asked to plead. Their counsel argued that the warrant was illegal; however, after much debate, this was overruled, and they pleaded. The Court then offered to take bail for their appearance, but they refused it and were ultimately dismissed on their own recognizances to appear two weeks later; the Archbishop in £200, the Bishops in £100 each.
17 June, 1688. Was a day of thanksgiving in London and ten miles about for the young Prince's birth; a form of prayer made for the purpose by the Bishop of Rochester.
17 June, 1688. It was a day of thanksgiving in London and ten miles around for the birth of the young Prince; a prayer was specifically created for this occasion by the Bishop of Rochester.
29th June, 1688. They appeared; the trial lasted from nine in the morning to past six in the evening, when the jury retired to consider of their verdict, and the Court adjourned to nine the next morning. The jury were locked up till that time, eleven of them being for an acquittal; but one (Arnold, a brewer) would not consent. At length he agreed with the others. The Chief Justice, Wright, behaved with great moderation and civility to the Bishops. Alibone, a Papist, was strongly against them; but Holloway and Powell being of opinion in their favor, they were acquitted. When this was heard, there was great rejoicing; and there was a lane of people from the King's Bench to the water side, on their knees, as the Bishops passed and repassed, to beg their blessing. Bonfires were made that night, and bells rung, which was taken very ill at Court, and an appearance of nearly sixty Earls and Lords, etc., on the bench, did not a little comfort them; but indeed they were all along full of comfort and cheerful.[Pg 274]
29th June, 1688. They showed up; the trial went from nine in the morning until after six in the evening, when the jury went off to deliberate on their verdict, and the Court adjourned until nine the next morning. The jury was kept locked up until then, with eleven of them in favor of an acquittal; however, one (Arnold, a brewer) wouldn’t agree. Eventually, he went along with the others. The Chief Justice, Wright, acted with great restraint and courtesy toward the Bishops. Alibone, a Catholic, was firmly against them; but Holloway and Powell felt differently and supported them, leading to their acquittal. When this news broke, there was immense celebration; a line of people from the King's Bench to the water side knelt as the Bishops went back and forth, seeking their blessing. Bonfires were lit that night, and bells rang, which displeased the Court, but the sight of nearly sixty Earls and Lords, among others, on the bench somewhat consoled them; however, they were generally quite comforted and in high spirits.[Pg 274]
Note, they denied to pay the Lieutenant of the Tower (Hales, who used them very surlily), any fees, alleging that none were due.
Note, they refused to pay the Lieutenant of the Tower (Hales, who dealt with them quite harshly), any fees, claiming that none were owed.
The night was solemnized with bonfires, and other fireworks, etc.
The night was celebrated with bonfires and other fireworks, etc.
2d July, 1688. The two judges, Holloway and Powell, were displaced.
2d July, 1688. The two judges, Holloway and Powell, were removed from their positions.
3d July, 1688. I went with Dr. Godolphin and his brother Sir William to St. Alban's, to see a library he would have bought of the widow of Dr. Cartwright, late Archdeacon of St. Alban's, a very good collection of books, especially in divinity; he was to give £300 for them. Having seen the GREAT CHURCH, now newly repaired by a public contribution, we returned home.
3rd July, 1688. I went with Dr. Godolphin and his brother Sir William to St. Alban's to check out a library that he was considering buying from the widow of Dr. Cartwright, the former Archdeacon of St. Alban's. It was a really good collection of books, especially in theology; he was offering £300 for them. After visiting the BIG CHURCH, which had just been renovated with public funding, we headed back home.
8th July, 1688. One of the King's chaplains preached before the Princess on Exodus xiv. 13, "Stand still, and behold the salvation of the Lord," which he applied so boldly to the present conjuncture of the Church of England, that more could scarce be said to encourage desponders. The Popish priests were not able to carry their cause against their learned adversaries, who confounded them both by their disputes and writings.
8th July, 1688. One of the King’s chaplains preached in front of the Princess on Exodus 14:13, "Stand still, and behold the salvation of the Lord." He applied it so bravely to the current situation of the Church of England that there was hardly anything more that could be said to lift the spirits of those feeling hopeless. The Catholic priests couldn’t make their case against their knowledgeable opponents, who overwhelmed them with both their arguments and writings.
12th July, 1688. The camp now began at Hounslow, but the nation was in high discontent.
12th July, 1688. The camp now started at Hounslow, but the country was very unhappy.
Colonel Titus, Sir Henry Vane (son of him who was executed for his treason), and some other of the Presbyterians and Independent party, were sworn of the Privy Council, from hopes of thereby diverting that party from going over to the Bishops and Church of England, which now they began to do, foreseeing the design of the Papists to descend and take in their most hateful of heretics (as they at other times expressed them to be) to effect their own ends, now evident; the utter extirpation of the Church of England first, and then the rest would follow.
Colonel Titus, Sir Henry Vane (the son of the man executed for treason), and some other members of the Presbyterian and Independent groups were sworn into the Privy Council in hopes of preventing their party from aligning with the Bishops and the Church of England. They were starting to do just that, realizing the Papists' plan to come down and take in their most despised heretics (as they had previously referred to them) to achieve their own obvious goals: first the complete eradication of the Church of England, followed by the rest.
17th July, 1688. This night the fireworks were played off, that had been prepared for the Queen's upsitting. We saw them to great advantage; they were very fine, and cost some thousands of pounds, in the pyramids, statues, etc., but were spent too soon for so long a preparation.
17th July, 1688. Tonight, the fireworks were set off that had been arranged for the Queen's ascent. We watched them from a great spot; they were impressive and cost thousands of pounds for the pyramids, statues, etc., but they ended too quickly after such a lengthy preparation.
26th July, 1688. I went to Lambeth to visit the Archbishop, whom I found very cheerful.[Pg 275]
26th July, 1688. I went to Lambeth to visit the Archbishop, whom I found very cheerful.[Pg 275]
10th August, 1688. Dr. Tenison now told me there would suddenly be some great thing discovered. This was the Prince of Orange intending to come over.
10th August, 1688. Dr. Tenison now told me there would suddenly be some major discovery. This was the Prince of Orange planning to come over.
15th August, 1688. I went to Althorpe, in Northamptonshire, seventy miles. A coach and four horses took up me and my son at Whitehall, and carried us to Dunstable, where we arrived and dined at noon, and from thence another coach and six horses carried us to Althorpe, four miles beyond Northampton, where we arrived by seven o'clock that evening. Both these coaches were hired for me by that noble Countess of Sunderland, who invited me to her house at Althorpe, where she entertained me and my son with very extraordinary kindness; I stayed till the Thursday.
15th August, 1688. I traveled to Althorpe in Northamptonshire, seventy miles away. A coach pulled by four horses picked up my son and me at Whitehall and took us to Dunstable, where we arrived and had lunch at noon. From there, another coach with six horses took us to Althorpe, four miles past Northampton, and we got there by seven o'clock that evening. Both of these coaches were arranged for me by the noble Countess of Sunderland, who invited me to her home at Althorpe, where she welcomed my son and me with incredible kindness. I stayed until Thursday.
18th August, 1688. Dr. Jeffryes, the minister of Althorpe, who was my Lord's chaplain when ambassador in France, preached the shortest discourse I ever heard; but what was defective in the amplitude of his sermon, he had supplied in the largeness and convenience of the parsonage house, which the doctor (who had at least £600 a year in spiritual advancement) had newly built, and made fit for a person of quality to live in, with gardens and all accommodation according therewith.
18th August, 1688. Dr. Jeffryes, the minister of Althorpe, who was my Lord's chaplain while he was an ambassador in France, preached the shortest sermon I've ever heard; but what he lacked in the length of his discourse, he made up for with the size and comfort of the parsonage house. The doctor (who had at least £600 a year from his position) had just built it, making it suitable for someone of high status to live in, complete with gardens and all the necessary amenities.
My lady carried us to see Lord Northampton's Seat, a very strong, large house, built with stone, not altogether modern. They were enlarging the garden, in which was nothing extraordinary, except the iron gate opening into the park, which indeed was very good work, wrought in flowers painted with blue and gilded. There is a noble walk of elms toward the front of the house by the bowling green. I was not in any room of the house besides a lobby looking into the garden, where my Lord and his new Countess (Sir Stephen Fox's daughter, whom I had known from a child) entertained the Countess and her daughter the Countess of Arran (newly married to the son of the Duke of Hamilton), with so little good grace, and so dully, that our visit was very short, and so we returned to Althorpe, twelve miles distant.
My lady took us to see Lord Northampton's Seat, a large and sturdy stone house that's not exactly modern. They were expanding the garden, which wasn't anything special, except for the iron gate leading into the park, which was actually well done, featuring floral designs in blue and gold. There’s a lovely row of elms in front of the house by the bowling green. I only went into one area of the house, which was a lobby overlooking the garden, where my Lord and his new Countess (Sir Stephen Fox's daughter, whom I had known since childhood) hosted the Countess and her daughter, the Countess of Arran (newly married to the son of the Duke of Hamilton). They entertained so awkwardly and blandly that our visit was very brief, so we headed back to Althorpe, twelve miles away.
The house, or rather palace, at Althorpe, is a noble uniform pile in form of a half H, built of brick and freestone, balustered and à la moderne; the hall is well, the staircase excellent; the rooms of state, galleries, offices and furniture, such as may become a great prince.[Pg 276] It is situated in the midst of a garden, exquisitely planted and kept, and all this in a park walled in with hewn stone, planted with rows and walks of trees, canals and fish ponds, and stored with game. And, what is above all this, governed by a lady, who without any show of solicitude, keeps everything in such admirable order, both within and without, from the garret to the cellar, that I do not believe there is any in this nation, or in any other, that exceeds her in such exact order, without ostentation, but substantially great and noble. The meanest servant is lodged so neat and cleanly; the service at the several tables, the good order and decency—in a word, the entire economy is perfectly becoming a wise and noble person. She is one who for her distinguished esteem of me from a long and worthy friendship, I must ever honor and celebrate. I wish from my soul the Lord, her husband (whose parts and abilities are otherwise conspicuous), was as worthy of her, as by a fatal apostasy and court-ambition he has made himself unworthy! This is what she deplores, and it renders her as much affliction as a lady of great soul and much prudence is capable of. The Countess of Bristol, her mother, a grave and honorable lady, has the comfort of seeing her daughter and grandchildren under the same economy, especially Mr. Charles Spencer, a youth of extraordinary hopes, very learned for his age, and ingenious, and under a governor of great worth. Happy were it, could as much be said of the elder brother, the Lord Spencer, who, rambling about the world, dishonors both his name and his family, adding sorrow to sorrow to a mother, who has taken all imaginable care of his education. There is a daughter very young married to the Earl of Clancarty, who has a great and fair estate in Ireland, but who yet gives no great presage of worth,—so universally contaminated is the youth of this corrupt and abandoned age! But this is again recompensed by my Lord Arran, a sober and worthy gentleman, who has espoused the Lady Ann Spencer, a young lady of admirable accomplishments and virtue.
The house, or rather palace, at Althorpe, is a grand, uniform structure shaped like a half H, made of brick and freestone, with a stylish modern feel; the hall is nice, the staircase is excellent, and the state rooms, galleries, offices, and furnishings are fitting for a great prince.[Pg 276] It's set in an exquisitely landscaped garden, all within a park surrounded by stone walls, featuring rows of trees, pathways, canals, fish ponds, and plenty of game. Above all this, it's run by a woman who, without any hint of fuss, maintains everything in such remarkable order, both inside and out, from the attic to the cellar, that I doubt anyone else in this country or any other surpasses her in such meticulous organization, all without showing off, yet truly impressive and dignified. Even the lowliest servant has a neat and tidy place; the service at the various tables is orderly and respectful—in short, the entire management is perfectly fitting for a wise and noble person. She is someone I will always respect and celebrate due to her longstanding and valued friendship with me. I sincerely wish that her husband, Lord Spencer (who is otherwise quite remarkable), was as worthy of her, as he has unfortunately made himself unworthy through a tragic downfall and ambition for court favors! This is what she mourns, and it brings her as much pain as a strong and wise lady can bear. The Countess of Bristol, her mother, a serious and honorable woman, finds comfort in seeing her daughter and grandchildren under the same household, especially Mr. Charles Spencer, a young man with exceptional promise, quite learned for his age, and clever, under the guidance of a highly respectable tutor. It would be great if the same could be said for the older brother, Lord Spencer, who, wandering around the world, brings shame to his name and family, causing his mother deep sorrow despite all her efforts in his education. There is also a very young daughter married to the Earl of Clancarty, who owns a large and beautiful estate in Ireland, though she does not yet show much potential—such is the widespread corruption of this lost and reckless generation! However, this is balanced by my Lord Arran, a sensible and honorable gentleman, who has married Lady Ann Spencer, a young woman of remarkable talents and virtue.
23d August, 1688. I left this noble place and conversation, my lady having provided carriages to convey us back in the same manner as we went, and a dinner being prepared at Dunstable against our arrival. Northampton,[Pg 277] having been lately burned and re-edified, is now become a town that for the beauty of the buildings, especially the church and townhouse, may compare with the neatest in Italy itself.
23rd August, 1688. I left this wonderful place and conversation, as my lady had arranged carriages to take us back the same way we came, and dinner was being prepared at Dunstable for our arrival. Northampton,[Pg 277] having recently been burned and rebuilt, has now become a town that, for the beauty of its buildings, especially the church and town hall, can compare with the prettiest in Italy itself.
Dr. Sprat, Bishop of Rochester, wrote a very honest and handsome letter to the Commissioners Ecclesiastical, excusing himself from sitting any longer among them, he by no means approving of their prosecuting the Clergy who refused to read the Declaration for liberty of conscience, in prejudice of the Church of England.
Dr. Sprat, Bishop of Rochester, wrote a very sincere and well-articulated letter to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, explaining why he could no longer participate with them. He strongly disapproved of their prosecution of the clergy who refused to read the Declaration for liberty of conscience, as it was detrimental to the Church of England.
The Dutch make extraordinary preparations both at sea and land, which with no small progress Popery makes among us, puts us to many difficulties. The Popish Irish soldiers commit many murders and insults; the whole nation disaffected, and in apprehensions.
The Dutch make impressive preparations both at sea and on land, which, along with the growing influence of Catholicism among us, creates many challenges. The Catholic Irish soldiers commit numerous murders and acts of disrespect; the entire nation is uneasy and anxious.
After long trials of the doctors to bring up the little Prince of Wales by hand (so many of her Majesty's children having died infants) not succeeding, a country nurse, the wife of a tile maker, is taken to give it suck.
After the doctors struggled for a long time to care for the little Prince of Wales by hand (since so many of her Majesty's children had died as infants) without success, a country nurse, who is the wife of a tile maker, is brought in to breastfeed him.
18th September, 1688. I went to London, where I found the Court in the utmost consternation on report of the Prince of Orange's landing; which put Whitehall into so panic a fear, that I could hardly believe it possible to find such a change.
18th September, 1688. I went to London, where I found the Court in total panic at the news of the Prince of Orange's landing; it caused such a fearful uproar at Whitehall that I could hardly believe the change was possible.
Writs were issued in order to a Parliament, and a declaration to back the good order of elections, with great professions of maintaining the Church of England, but without giving any sort of satisfaction to the people, who showed their high discontent at several things in the Government.
Writs were issued to summon a Parliament, along with a declaration to support the proper conduct of elections, strongly affirming the commitment to uphold the Church of England, yet without providing any real reassurance to the people, who expressed their significant dissatisfaction with various aspects of the Government.
Earthquakes had utterly demolished the ancient Smyrna, and several other places in Greece, Italy, and even in the Spanish Indies, forerunners of greater calamities. God Almighty preserve his Church and all who put themselves under the shadow of his wings, till these things be overpassed.
Earthquakes had completely destroyed the ancient Smyrna, as well as several other locations in Greece, Italy, and even in the Spanish Indies, signaling greater disasters to come. May God Almighty protect his Church and everyone who seeks refuge under his wings until these troubles pass.
30th September, 1688. The Court in so extraordinary a consternation, on assurance of the Prince of Orange's intention to land, that the writs sent forth for a Parliament were recalled.
30th September, 1688. The Court was in such an extraordinary panic upon hearing that the Prince of Orange intended to land, that the writs issued for a Parliament were canceled.
7th October, 1688. Dr. Tenison preached at St. Martin's on 2 Tim. iii. 16, showing the Scriptures to be our only rule of faith, and its perfection above all traditions.[Pg 278] After which, near 1,000 devout persons partook of the Communion. The sermon was chiefly occasioned by a Jesuit, who in the Masshouse on the Sunday before had disparaged the Scripture and railed at our translation, which some present contradicting, they pulled him out of the pulpit, and treated him very coarsely, insomuch that it was like to create a great disturbance in the city.
7th October, 1688. Dr. Tenison preached at St. Martin's on 2 Tim. iii. 16, emphasizing that the Scriptures are our only rule of faith and that they are superior to all traditions.[Pg 278] Afterward, nearly 1,000 devout individuals received Communion. The sermon was primarily prompted by a Jesuit, who had criticized the Scripture and insulted our translation in the Masshouse the Sunday before. Some attendees pushed back against him, pulling him out of the pulpit and treating him very harshly, which nearly caused a significant uproar in the city.
Hourly expectation of the Prince of Orange's invasion heightened to that degree, that his Majesty thought fit to abrogate the Commission for the dispensing Power (but retaining his own right still to dispense with all laws) and restore the ejected Fellows of Magdalen College, Oxford. In the meantime, he called over 5,000 Irish, and 4,000 Scots, and continued to remove Protestants and put in Papists at Portsmouth and other places of trust, and retained the Jesuits about him, increasing the universal discontent. It brought people to so desperate a pass, that they seemed passionately to long for and desire the landing of that Prince, whom they looked on to be their deliverer from Popish tyranny, praying incessantly for an east wind, which was said to be the only hindrance of his expedition with a numerous army ready to make a descent. To such a strange temper, and unheard of in former times, was this poor nation reduced, and of which I was an eyewitness. The apprehension was (and with reason) that his Majesty's forces would neither at land nor sea oppose them with that vigor requisite to repel invaders.
Hourly expectations of the Prince of Orange's invasion grew to such an extent that his Majesty decided to cancel the Commission for the dispensing Power (while still keeping his right to override all laws) and restore the ousted Fellows of Magdalen College, Oxford. In the meantime, he summoned 5,000 Irish and 4,000 Scots, continued to replace Protestants with Catholics in Portsmouth and other trusted positions, and kept the Jesuits close by, which increased widespread discontent. People became so desperate that they seemed to eagerly long for the landing of that Prince, whom they viewed as their savior from Catholic oppression, praying non-stop for an east wind, which was said to be the only obstacle to his expedition with a large army ready to invade. This poor nation was brought to such a strange state, unheard of in previous times, and I witnessed it firsthand. There was a reasonable fear that his Majesty's forces would not, on land or sea, confront them with the necessary strength to repel invaders.
The late imprisoned Bishops were now called to reconcile matters, and the Jesuits hard at work to foment confusion among the Protestants by their usual tricks. A letter was sent to the Archbishop of Canterbury,71 informing[Pg 279] him, from good hands, of what was contriving by them. A paper of what the Bishops advised his Majesty was published. The Bishops were enjoined to prepare a form of prayer against the feared invasion. A pardon published. Soldiers and mariners daily pressed.
The recently imprisoned bishops were now called to settle things, while the Jesuits were busy stirring up trouble among the Protestants with their usual tactics. A letter was sent to the Archbishop of Canterbury,71 informing[Pg 279] him, from reliable sources, about what they were plotting. A document detailing what the bishops advised the king was made public. The bishops were instructed to prepare a prayer to counter the anticipated invasion. A pardon was announced. Soldiers and sailors were being recruited daily.
14th October, 1688. The King's birthday. No guns from the Tower as usual. The sun eclipsed at its rising. This day signal for the victory of William the Conqueror against Harold, near Battel, in Sussex. The wind, which had been hitherto west, was east all this day. Wonderful expectation of the Dutch fleet. Public prayers ordered to be read in the churches against invasion.
14th October, 1688. The King's birthday. No gun salutes from the Tower as usual. The sun was eclipsed at sunrise. This day marks the victory of William the Conqueror over Harold, near Battle, in Sussex. The wind, which had been coming from the west, changed to the east for the entire day. There’s great anticipation for the Dutch fleet. Public prayers are to be read in churches to pray against invasion.
28th October, 1688. A tumult in London on the rab[Pg 280]ble demolishing a Popish chapel that had been set up in the city.
28th October, 1688. A riot in London over the rabble demolishing a Catholic chapel that had been established in the city.
29th October, 1688. Lady Sunderland acquainted me with his Majesty's taking away the Seals from Lord Sunderland, and of her being with the Queen to intercede for him. It is conceived that he had of late grown remiss in pursuing the interest of the Jesuitical counsels; some reported one thing, some another; but there was doubtless some secret betrayed, which time may discover.
29th October, 1688. Lady Sunderland informed me that the King had removed the Seals from Lord Sunderland and that she had been with the Queen to plead for him. It seems that he had recently become negligent in furthering the interests of the Jesuit advisors; some said one thing, others said another. However, there was definitely some secret revealed, which time may reveal.
There was a Council called, to which were summoned the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Judges, the Lord Mayor, etc. The Queen Dowager, and all the ladies and lords who were present at the Queen Consort's labor, were to give their testimony upon oath of the Prince of Wales's birth, recorded both at the Council Board and at the Chancery a day or two after. This procedure was censured by some as below his Majesty to condescend to, on the talk of the people. It was remarkable that on this occasion the Archbishop, Marquis of Halifax, the Earls of Clarendon and Nottingham, refused to sit at the Council table among Papists, and their bold telling his Majesty that whatever was done while such sat among them was unlawful and incurred præmunire;—at least, if what I heard be true.
There was a Council meeting called, to which the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Judges, the Lord Mayor, and others were summoned. The Queen Dowager and all the ladies and lords who were present during the Queen Consort's labor were required to give their testimony under oath regarding the birth of the Prince of Wales, which was recorded both at the Council Board and at the Chancery a day or two later. Some criticized this procedure as being beneath his Majesty to engage in, given the public discourse. It was noteworthy that on this occasion, the Archbishop, the Marquis of Halifax, and the Earls of Clarendon and Nottingham refused to sit at the Council table alongside Papists, boldly telling his Majesty that anything done while such individuals were present was unlawful and would incur præmunire;—at least, if what I heard is true.
30th October, 1688. I dined with Lord Preston, made Secretary of State, in the place of the Earl of Sunderland.
30th October, 1688. I had dinner with Lord Preston, who was made Secretary of State, replacing the Earl of Sunderland.
Visited Mr. Boyle, when came in the Duke of Hamilton and Earl of Burlington. The Duke told us many particulars of Mary Queen of Scots, and her amours with the Italian favorite, etc.
Visited Mr. Boyle when the Duke of Hamilton and the Earl of Burlington arrived. The Duke shared many details about Mary Queen of Scots and her affairs with the Italian favorite, etc.
31st October, 1688. My birthday, being the 68th year of my age. O blessed Lord, grant that as I grow in years, so may I improve in grace! Be thou my protector this following year, and preserve me and mine from those dangers and great confusions that threaten a sad revolution to this sinful nation! Defend thy church, our holy religion, and just laws, disposing his Majesty to listen to sober and healing counsels, that if it be thy blessed will, we may still enjoy that happy tranquility which hitherto thou hast continued to us! Amen, Amen!
31st October, 1688. My birthday, marking my 68th year. O blessed Lord, as I grow older, may I also grow in grace! Be my protector this coming year, and keep me and my loved ones safe from the dangers and chaos that threaten to bring sorrow to this sinful nation! Defend your church, our holy faith, and just laws, and guide His Majesty to heed wise and healing advice, so that, if it is your will, we may continue to enjoy the peace that you have provided us so far! Amen, Amen!
1st November, 1688. Dined with Lord Preston, with other company, at Sir Stephen Fox's. Continual alarms[Pg 281] of the Prince of Orange, but no certainty. Reports of his great losses of horse in the storm, but without any assurance. A man was taken with divers papers and printed manifestoes, and carried to Newgate, after examination at the Cabinet Council. There was likewise a declaration of the States for satisfaction of all public ministers at The Hague, except to the English and the French. There was in that of the Prince's an expression, as if the Lords both spiritual and temporal had invited him over, with a deduction of the causes of his enterprise. This made his Majesty convene my Lord of Canterbury and the other Bishops now in town, to give an account of what was in the manifesto, and to enjoin them to clear themselves by some public writing of this disloyal charge.
1st November, 1688. Had dinner with Lord Preston and others at Sir Stephen Fox's place. There are constant alarms about the Prince of Orange, but nothing certain. There are reports of him losing many horses in the storm, but no confirmation. A man was caught with various papers and printed manifestoes and was taken to Newgate after being examined by the Cabinet Council. There was also a declaration from the States for the satisfaction of all public ministers at The Hague, except the English and the French. In the Prince's declaration, there was a suggestion that both spiritual and temporal Lords had invited him over, along with an explanation of the reasons for his actions. This prompted His Majesty to gather my Lord of Canterbury and the other Bishops currently in town to explain what was in the manifesto and to urge them to publicly distance themselves from this disloyal accusation.
2d November, 1688. It was now certainly reported by some who saw the fleet, and the Prince embark, that they sailed from the Brill on Wednesday morning, and that the Princess of Orange was there to take leave of her husband.
2d November, 1688. It was now definitely reported by some who saw the fleet and the Prince board that they left the Brill on Wednesday morning, and that the Princess of Orange was there to say goodbye to her husband.
4th November, 1688. Fresh reports of the Prince being landed somewhere about Portsmouth, or the Isle of Wight, whereas it was thought it would have been northward. The Court in great hurry.
4th November, 1688. New reports say the Prince has landed somewhere near Portsmouth or the Isle of Wight, when it was expected he would be further north. The Court is in a big rush.
5th November, 1688. I went to London; heard the news of the Prince having landed at Torbay, coming with a fleet of near 700 sail, passing through the Channel with so favorable a wind, that our navy could not intercept, or molest them. This put the King and Court into great consternation, they were now employed in forming an army to stop their further progress, for they were got into Exeter, and the season and ways very improper for his Majesty's forces to march so great a distance.
5th November, 1688. I went to London; I heard the news that the Prince had landed at Torbay, arriving with a fleet of nearly 700 ships, passing through the Channel with such a favorable wind that our navy couldn’t intercept or hinder them. This caused great panic among the King and Court, who were now busy assembling an army to halt their advance, as they had already made it to Exeter, and the season and conditions were very unsuitable for his Majesty's troops to march such a long distance.
The Archbishop of Canterbury and some few of the other Bishops and Lords in London, were sent for to Whitehall, and required to set forth their abhorrence of this invasion. They assured his Majesty that they had never invited any of the Prince's party, or were in the least privy to it, and would be ready to show all testimony of their loyalty; but, as to a public declaration, being so few, they desired that his Majesty would call the rest of their brethren and Peers, that they might[Pg 282] consult what was fit to be done on this occasion, not thinking it right to publish anything without them, and till they had themselves seen the Prince's manifesto, in which it was pretended he was invited in by the Lords, spiritual and temporal. This did not please the King; so they departed.
The Archbishop of Canterbury and a few other Bishops and Lords in London were called to Whitehall and asked to express their disapproval of this invasion. They assured His Majesty that they had never invited anyone from the Prince's party, nor were they aware of it in the slightest, and they were ready to provide proof of their loyalty. However, regarding a public statement, they felt that since there were so few of them, it would be better for His Majesty to summon the rest of their fellow Bishops and Peers to discuss what should be done in this situation. They didn’t think it was right to make any announcement without them, especially until they had seen the Prince's manifesto, which incorrectly claimed that he was invited by both the spiritual and temporal Lords. This did not please the King, so they left.
A declaration was published, prohibiting all persons to see or read the Prince's manifesto, in which was set forth at large the cause of his expedition, as there had been one before from the States.
A declaration was issued, banning everyone from seeing or reading the Prince's manifesto, which explained in detail the reasons for his expedition, just as there had been one earlier from the States.
These are the beginnings of sorrow, unless God in his mercy prevent it by some happy reconciliation of all dissensions among us. This, in all likelihood, nothing can effect except a free Parliament; but this we cannot hope to see, while there are any forces on either side. I pray God to protect and direct the King for the best and truest interest of his people!—I saw his Majesty touch for the evil, Piten the Jesuit, and Warner officiating.
These are the beginnings of sorrow, unless God, in His mercy, stops it by bringing about a good reconciliation of all our disagreements. Likely, nothing can achieve this except a free Parliament; but we can't expect to see that while there are any forces on either side. I pray that God protects and guides the King for the best and truest interests of his people!—I saw His Majesty touch for the sick, with Piten the Jesuit and Warner officiating.
14th November, 1688. The Prince increases everyday in force. Several Lords go in to him. Lord Cornbury carries some regiments, and marches to Honiton, the Prince's headquarters. The city of London in disorder; the rabble pulled down the nunnery newly bought by the Papists of Lord Berkeley, at St. John's. The Queen prepares to go to Portsmouth for safety, to attend the issue of this commotion, which has a dreadful aspect.
14th November, 1688. The Prince is gaining power every day. Several Lords are joining him. Lord Cornbury leads some regiments and is heading to Honiton, the Prince's headquarters. The city of London is in chaos; the mob has destroyed the convent recently purchased by Lord Berkeley's Papists at St. John's. The Queen is getting ready to go to Portsmouth for safety to see how this situation unfolds, which looks very grim.
18th November, 1688. It was now a very hard frost. The King goes to Salisbury to rendezvous the army, and return to London. Lord Delamere appears for the Prince in Cheshire. The nobility meet in Yorkshire. The Archbishop of Canterbury and some Bishops, and such Peers as were in London, address his Majesty to call a Parliament. The King invites all foreign nations to come over. The French take all the Palatinate, and alarm the Germans more than ever.
18th November, 1688. It was a severe frost. The King heads to Salisbury to meet the army and then return to London. Lord Delamere represents the Prince in Cheshire. The nobility gathers in Yorkshire. The Archbishop of Canterbury, some Bishops, and other Peers in London urge his Majesty to call a Parliament. The King invites all foreign nations to come over. The French take over the Palatinate, causing more alarm for the Germans than ever.
29th November, 1688. I went to the Royal Society. We adjourned the election of a President to 23d of April, by reason of the public commotions, yet dined together as of custom this day.
29th November, 1688. I went to the Royal Society. We postponed the election of a President to the 23rd of April due to the public unrest, but we still had our usual dinner together today.
2d December, 1688. Dr. Tenison preached at St. Martin's on Psalm xxxvi. 5, 6, 7, concerning Providence. I received the blessed Sacrament. Afterward, visited my Lord Godolphin, then going with the Marquis of Halifax[Pg 283] and Earl of Nottingham as Commissioners to the Prince of Orange; he told me they had little power. Plymouth declared for the Prince. Bath, York, Hull, Bristol, and all the eminent nobility and persons of quality through England, declare for the Protestant religion and laws, and go to meet the Prince, who every day sets forth new Declarations against the Papists. The great favorites at Court, Priests and Jesuits, fly or abscond. Everything, till now concealed, flies abroad in public print, and is cried about the streets. Expectation of the Prince coming to Oxford. The Prince of Wales and great treasure sent privily to Portsmouth, the Earl of Dover being Governor. Address from the Fleet not grateful to his Majesty. The Papists in offices lay down their commissions, and fly. Universal consternation among them; it looks like a revolution.
2nd December, 1688. Dr. Tenison preached at St. Martin's on Psalm 36:5-7, discussing Providence. I received the blessed Sacrament. Afterward, I visited my Lord Godolphin, who was about to go with the Marquis of Halifax and the Earl of Nottingham as Commissioners to the Prince of Orange; he told me they had little power. Plymouth declared for the Prince. Bath, York, Hull, Bristol, and all the notable nobility and quality individuals throughout England are declaring for the Protestant religion and laws, and are going to meet the Prince, who issues new declarations against the Papists every day. The main favorites at Court, priests and Jesuits, are fleeing or hiding. Everything that until now was kept secret is now being published and shouted about in the streets. There's growing expectation of the Prince's arrival in Oxford. The Prince of Wales and a large amount of treasure were sent secretly to Portsmouth, where the Earl of Dover is the Governor. An address from the Fleet was not well received by his Majesty. The Papists in positions of power are resigning their commissions and fleeing. There's widespread panic among them; it feels like a revolution.
7th December, 1688. My son went toward Oxford. I returned home.
7th December, 1688. My son went to Oxford. I went back home.
9th December, 1688. Lord Sunderland meditates flight. The rabble demolished all Popish chapels, and several Papist lords and gentlemen's houses, especially that of the Spanish Ambassador, which they pillaged, and burned his library.
9th December, 1688. Lord Sunderland considers escape. The mob destroyed all Catholic chapels and several homes of Catholic lords and gentlemen, particularly that of the Spanish Ambassador, which they looted and set fire to his library.
13th December, 1688. The King flies to sea, puts in at Faversham for ballast; is rudely treated by the people; comes back to Whitehall.
13th December, 1688. The King flees by sea, stops at Faversham for supplies; is poorly received by the locals; returns to Whitehall.
The Prince of Orange is advanced to Windsor, is invited by the King to St. James's, the messenger sent was the Earl of Faversham, the General of the Forces, who going without trumpet, or passport, is detained prisoner by the Prince, who accepts the invitation, but requires his Majesty to retire to some distant place, that his own guards may be quartered about the palace and city. This is taken heinously and the King goes privately to Rochester; is persuaded to come back; comes on the Sunday; goes to mass, and dines in public, a Jesuit saying grace (I was present).
The Prince of Orange has moved to Windsor and has been invited by the King to St. James's. The messenger sent was the Earl of Faversham, the General of the Forces, who, going without a trumpet or pass, is captured by the Prince. The Prince accepts the invitation but asks the King to move to a distant location so that his own guards can be stationed around the palace and city. This is viewed very negatively, and the King goes secretly to Rochester but is persuaded to return. He comes back on Sunday, attends mass, and has a public dinner with a Jesuit saying grace (I was there).
17th December, 1688. That night was a Council; his Majesty refuses to assent to all the proposals; goes away again to Rochester.
17th December, 1688. That night there was a Council; his Majesty refuses to agree to all the proposals and leaves again for Rochester.
18th December, 1688. I saw the King take barge to Gravesend at twelve o'clock—a sad sight! The Prince comes to St. James's, and fills Whitehall with Dutch[Pg 284] guards. A Council of Peers meet about an expedient to call a Parliament; adjourn to the House of Lords. The Chancellor, Earl of Peterborough, and divers others taken. The Earl of Sunderland flies; Sir Edward Hale, Walker, and others, taken and secured.
18th December, 1688. I saw the King board a boat to Gravesend at noon—a heartbreaking sight! The Prince arrives at St. James's and fills Whitehall with Dutch[Pg 284] guards. A Council of Peers meets to discuss a way to call a Parliament; they adjourn to the House of Lords. The Chancellor, Earl of Peterborough, and several others are captured. The Earl of Sunderland flees; Sir Edward Hale, Walker, and others are taken and detained.
All the world go to see the Prince at St. James's, where there is a great Court. There I saw him, and several of my acquaintance who came over with him. He is very stately, serious and reserved. The English soldiers sent out of town to disband them; not well pleased.
All the world goes to see the Prince at St. James's, where there is a big court. I saw him there, along with several people I know who came over with him. He is very regal, serious, and reserved. The English soldiers have been sent out of town to disband; they aren't happy about it.
24th December, 1688. The King passes into France, whither the Queen and child were gone a few days before.
24th December, 1688. The King travels to France, where the Queen and child had gone a few days earlier.
26th December, 1688. The Peers and such Commoners as were members of the Parliament at Oxford, being the last of Charles II. meeting, desire the Prince of Orange to take on him the disposal of the public revenue till a convention of Lords and Commons should meet in full body, appointed by his circular letters to the shires and boroughs, 22d of January. I had now quartered upon me a Lieutenant-Colonel and eight horses.
26th December, 1688. The Peers and some Commoners who were part of the Parliament at Oxford, during the last meeting of Charles II., requested the Prince of Orange to manage the public revenue until a convention of Lords and Commons could meet in full, as he announced in his circular letters to the counties and boroughs, dated 22nd of January. At this point, I had a Lieutenant-Colonel and eight horses assigned to me.
30th December, 1688. This day prayers for the Prince of Wales were first left off in our Church.
30th December, 1688. Today, prayers for the Prince of Wales were removed from our Church.
7th January, 1688-89. A long frost and deep snow; the Thames almost frozen over.
7th January, 1688-89. A long cold snap and heavy snowfall; the Thames was nearly frozen.
15th January, 1689. I visited the Archbishop of Canterbury, where I found the Bishops of St. Asaph, Ely, Bath and Wells, Peterborough, and Chichester, the Earls of Aylesbury and Clarendon, Sir George Mackenzie, Lord-Advocate of Scotland, and then came in a Scotch Archbishop, etc. After prayers and dinner, divers serious matters were discoursed, concerning the present state of the Public, and sorry I was to find there was as yet no accord in the judgments of those of the Lords and Commons who were to convene; some would have the Princess made Queen without any more dispute, others were for a Regency; there was a Tory party (then so called), who were for inviting his Majesty again upon conditions; and there were Republicans who would make the Prince of Orange like a Stadtholder. The Romanists were busy among these several parties to bring them into confusion: most for ambition or other interest, few for conscience and moderate resolutions. I found nothing of all this in this assembly of Bishops, who were pleased to[Pg 285] admit me into their discourses; they were all for a Regency, thereby to salve their oaths, and so all public matters to proceed in his Majesty's name, by that to facilitate the calling of Parliament, according to the laws in being. Such was the result of this meeting.
15th January, 1689. I visited the Archbishop of Canterbury, where I found the Bishops of St. Asaph, Ely, Bath and Wells, Peterborough, and Chichester, the Earls of Aylesbury and Clarendon, Sir George Mackenzie, Lord Advocate of Scotland, and then a Scottish Archbishop came in, etc. After prayers and dinner, we discussed various serious matters regarding the current state of the public. I was disappointed to see that there was still no agreement among the Lords and Commons who were set to meet; some wanted to make the Princess Queen without further debate, while others favored a Regency. There was a Tory faction (as it was called then) who wanted to invite his Majesty back under certain conditions, and there were Republicans who wanted to give the Prince of Orange a status like a Stadtholder. The Romanists were actively trying to stir up confusion among these different groups: most were driven by ambition or other interests, and few were motivated by conscience and moderate solutions. I didn’t hear any of this from the assembly of Bishops, who kindly included me in their discussions; they all supported a Regency as a way to uphold their oaths, allowing all public matters to proceed in his Majesty's name, which would help facilitate the calling of Parliament according to the existing laws. That was the outcome of this meeting.
My Lord of Canterbury gave me great thanks for the advertisement I sent him in October, and assured me they took my counsel in that particular, and that it came very seasonably.
My Lord of Canterbury thanked me a lot for the advice I sent him in October, and he assured me they valued my input on that matter, saying it was very timely.
I found by the Lord-Advocate that the Bishops of Scotland (who were indeed little worthy of that character, and had done much mischief in that Church) were now coming about to the true interest, in this conjuncture which threatened to abolish the whole hierarchy in that kingdom; and therefore the Scottish Archbishop and Lord-Advocate requested the Archbishop of Canterbury to use his best endeavors with the Prince to maintain the Church there in the same state, as by law at present settled.
I learned from the Lord Advocate that the Bishops of Scotland (who were really not deserving of that title and had caused a lot of harm to the Church) were now aligning with the true interests at a time that threatened to eliminate the entire hierarchy in the kingdom. Therefore, the Scottish Archbishop and Lord Advocate asked the Archbishop of Canterbury to do everything he could with the Prince to keep the Church there in its current legal state.
It now growing late, after some private discourse with his Grace, I took my leave, most of the Lords being gone.
It was getting late, and after a private conversation with his Grace, I said my goodbyes, with most of the Lords having already left.
The trial of the bishops was now printed.
The trial of the bishops was now published.
The great convention being assembled the day before, falling upon the question about the government, resolved that King James having by the advice of the Jesuits and other wicked persons endeavored to subvert the laws of the Church and State, and deserted the kingdom, carrying away the seals, etc., without any care for the management of the government, had by demise abdicated himself and wholly vacated his right; they did therefore desire the Lords' concurrence to their vote, to place the crown on the next heir, the Prince of Orange, for his life, then to the Princess, his wife, and if she died without issue, to the Princess of Denmark, and she failing, to the heirs of the Prince, excluding forever all possibility of admitting a Roman Catholic.
The large convention gathered the day before, addressing the issue of the government, concluded that King James, influenced by the Jesuits and other corrupt individuals, tried to undermine the Church and State's laws and abandoned the kingdom, taking the royal seals with him, without showing any concern for governing. They determined he had effectively abdicated and completely lost his right to rule. Therefore, they sought the Lords' agreement on their decision to place the crown on the next heir, the Prince of Orange, for his lifetime, then to his wife, the Princess, and if she died without children, to the Princess of Denmark. If she also failed to have heirs, the crown would go to the Prince's descendants, permanently excluding any possibility of a Roman Catholic being admitted to the throne.
27th January, 1689. I dined at the Admiralty, where was brought in a child not twelve years old, the son of one Dr. Clench, of the most prodigious maturity of knowledge, for I cannot call it altogether memory, but something more extraordinary. Mr. Pepys and myself examined him, not in any method, but with promiscuous questions, which required judgment and discernment to[Pg 286] answer so readily and pertinently. There was not anything in chronology, history, geography, the several systems of astronomy, courses of the stars, longitude, latitude, doctrine of the spheres, courses and sources of rivers, creeks, harbors, eminent cities, boundaries and bearings of countries, not only in Europe, but in any other part of the earth, which he did not readily resolve and demonstrate his knowledge of, readily drawing out with a pen anything he would describe. He was able not only to repeat the most famous things which are left us in any of the Greek or Roman histories, monarchies, republics, wars, colonies, exploits by sea and land, but all the sacred stories of the Old and New Testament; the succession of all the monarchies, Babylonian, Persian, Greek, Roman, with all the lower Emperors, Popes, Heresiarchs, and Councils, what they were called about, what they determined, or in the controversy about Easter, the tenets of the Gnostics, Sabellians, Arians, Nestorians; the difference between St. Cyprian and Stephen about re-baptism, the schisms. We leaped from that to other things totally different, to Olympic years, and synchronisms; we asked him questions which could not be resolved without considerable meditation and judgment, nay of some particulars of the Civil Laws, of the Digest and Code. He gave a stupendous account of both natural and moral philosophy, and even in metaphysics.
27th January, 1689. I had dinner at the Admiralty, where a child not yet twelve years old was brought in, the son of Dr. Clench. His knowledge was astonishing; I can’t call it just memory, but something much more remarkable. Mr. Pepys and I questioned him, not in any structured way, but with random questions that required real judgment and insight to answer quickly and accurately. There wasn't a single topic in chronology, history, geography, different astronomy systems, the movements of stars, longitude, latitude, the doctrine of spheres, or the paths and sources of rivers, creeks, harbors, major cities, and the boundaries of countries—not just in Europe, but anywhere in the world—that he couldn’t explain and demonstrate his knowledge of, easily sketching anything he described. He could not only recite the most notable events from Greek and Roman histories, monarchies, republics, wars, colonies, and feats at sea and on land, but also all the sacred stories from the Old and New Testaments; he detailed the succession of all the monarchies: Babylonian, Persian, Greek, Roman, including all the lesser emperors, popes, heretics, and councils, what they were called, what decisions they made, or in the Easter controversy, the beliefs of the Gnostics, Sabellians, Arians, Nestorians; the dispute between St. Cyprian and Stephen over re-baptism, the schisms. We jumped from that to entirely different subjects, like Olympic years and synchronisms; we asked him questions that required significant thought and judgment, even about specific details of civil law, the Digest, and the Code. He provided an incredible explanation of both natural and moral philosophy, and even in metaphysics.
Having thus exhausted ourselves rather than this wonderful child, or angel rather, for he was as beautiful and lovely in countenance as in knowledge, we concluded with asking him if, in all he had read or heard of, he had ever met with anything which was like this expedition of the Prince of Orange, with so small a force to obtain three great kingdoms without any contest. After a little thought, he told us that he knew of nothing which did more resemble it than the coming of Constantine the Great out of Britain, through France and Italy, so tedious a march, to meet Maxentius, whom he overthrew at Pons Milvius with very little conflict, and at the very gates of Rome, which he entered and was received with triumph, and obtained the empire, not of three kingdoms only, but of all the then known world. He was perfect in the Latin authors, spoke French naturally, and gave us a description of France, Italy, Savoy, Spain,[Pg 287] ancient and modernly divided; as also of ancient Greece, Scythia, and northern countries and tracts: we left questioning further. He did this without any set or formal repetitions, as one who had learned things without book, but as if he minded other things, going about the room, and toying with a parrot there, and as he was at dinner (tanquam aliua agens, as it were) seeming to be full of play, of a lively, sprightly temper, always smiling, and exceedingly pleasant, without the least levity, rudeness, or childishness.
Having exhausted ourselves rather than this amazing child, or angel really, since he was as beautiful and lovely in face as he was knowledgeable, we ended by asking him if, in all he had read or heard, he had ever encountered anything like this expedition of the Prince of Orange, with such a small force to take three great kingdoms without any conflict. After a moment of reflection, he told us that he couldn't think of anything more similar than the journey of Constantine the Great coming out of Britain, through France and Italy, such a long march, to confront Maxentius, whom he defeated at Pons Milvius with very little struggle, and at the very gates of Rome, which he entered and was welcomed with triumph, gaining the empire not just over three kingdoms, but over the entire known world at that time. He was well-versed in Latin literature, spoke French fluently, and described France, Italy, Savoy, and Spain, both in ancient and modern divisions; he also spoke of ancient Greece, Scythia, and the northern regions and territories: we left it at that without further questions. He did this without any memorized responses, as if he had learned things naturally, while attending to other matters, moving around the room, playing with a parrot there, and while he was at dinner, almost as if he were preoccupied (tanquam aliua agens), appearing full of playfulness, with a lively and cheerful demeanor, always smiling, and incredibly pleasant, without the slightest hint of frivolity, rudeness, or childishness.
His father assured us he never imposed anything to charge his memory by causing him to get things by heart, not even the rules of grammar; but his tutor (who was a Frenchman) read to him, first in French, then in Latin; that he usually played among other boys four or five hours every day, and that he was as earnest at his play as at his study. He was perfect in arithmetic, and now newly entered into Greek. In sum (horresco referens), I had read of divers forward and precocious youths, and some I have known, but I never did either hear or read of anything like to this sweet child, if it be right to call him child who has more knowledge than most men in the world. I counseled his father not to set his heart too much on this jewel,
His father assured us he never forced him to memorize anything, not even grammar rules; but his tutor (who was French) read to him, first in French, then in Latin. He usually played with other boys for four or five hours every day, and he was as serious about his play as he was about his studies. He was excellent at math and had just started learning Greek. In short (horresco referens), I had read about many advanced and gifted young people, and some I've known personally, but I have never heard or read about anyone like this sweet child, if it’s right to call him a child who has more knowledge than most men in the world. I advised his father not to get too attached to this gem,
"Immodicis brevis est ætas, et rara senectus,"
"Life is short for the greedy, and old age is rare,"
as I myself learned by sad experience in my most dear child Richard, many years since, who, dying before he was six years old, was both in shape and countenance and pregnancy of learning, next to a prodigy.
as I personally learned through painful experience with my beloved child Richard, many years ago, who passed away before he turned six years old and was, in both appearance and intellect, nearly a wonder.
29th January, 1689. The votes of the House of Commons being carried up by Mr. Hampden, their chairman, to the Lords, I got a station by the Prince's lodgings at the door of the lobby to the House, and heard much of the debate, which lasted very long. Lord Derby was in the chair (for the House was resolved into a grand committee of the whole House); after all had spoken, it came to the question, which was carried by three voices against a Regency, which 51 were for, 54 against; the minority alleging the danger of dethroning Kings, and scrupling many passages and expressions in the vote of the Commons, too long to set down particularly. Some were for sending to his Majesty with conditions: others[Pg 288] that the King could do no wrong, and that the maladministration was chargeable on his ministers. There were not more than eight or nine bishops, and but two against the Regency; the archbishop was absent, and the clergy now began to change their note, both in pulpit and discourse, on their old passive obedience, so as people began to talk of the bishops being cast out of the House. In short, things tended to dissatisfaction on both sides; add to this, the morose temper of the Prince of Orange, who showed little countenance to the noblemen and others, who expected a more gracious and cheerful reception when they made their court. The English army also was not so in order, and firm to his interest, nor so weakened but that it might give interruption. Ireland was in an ill posture as well as Scotland. Nothing was yet done toward a settlement. God of his infinite mercy compose these things, that we may be at last a Nation and a Church under some fixed and sober establishment!
29th January, 1689. The votes from the House of Commons were taken up by Mr. Hampden, their chairman, to the Lords. I found a spot near the Prince's lodgings at the lobby door to the House and listened to much of the debate, which went on for a long time. Lord Derby was in charge as the House had become a grand committee of the whole House. After everyone had spoken, it came down to the vote, which was decided by three voices against a Regency, with 51 in favor and 54 against. The minority argued that there was a danger in dethroning Kings and expressed concerns about several parts and phrases in the Commons' vote, which were too lengthy to detail. Some wanted to send a message to the King with conditions; others claimed that the King could do no wrong and that any mismanagement should fall on his ministers. There were only about eight or nine bishops present, and just two opposed the Regency; the Archbishop was absent, and the clergy began to shift their stance in both sermons and discussions regarding their old passive obedience, leading people to talk about the bishops being removed from the House. In short, tensions rose on both sides; adding to this was the sour demeanor of the Prince of Orange, who showed little friendliness to the noblemen and others that expected a warmer and more welcoming reception. The English army wasn't well-organized and committed to his interests, nor was it so weakened that it couldn't cause trouble. Ireland was in a bad state, just like Scotland. No progress had been made toward a resolution. May God in His infinite mercy bring peace to these matters, so we can finally become a Nation and a Church under some stable and sensible establishment!
30th January, 1689. The anniversary of King Charles I.'s MARTYRDOM; but in all the public offices and pulpit prayers, the collects, and litany for the King and Queen were curtailed and mutilated. Dr. Sharp preached before the Commons, but was disliked, and not thanked for his sermon.
30th January, 1689. The anniversary of King Charles I.'s Martyrdom; however, in all the public offices and prayers from the pulpit, the prayers for the King and Queen were shortened and distorted. Dr. Sharp preached before the Commons, but he was not well-received and did not receive thanks for his sermon.
31st January, 1689. At our church (the next day being appointed a thanksgiving for deliverance by the Prince of Orange, with prayers purposely composed), our lecturer preached in the afternoon a very honest sermon, showing our duty to God for the many signal deliverances of our Church, without touching on politics.
31st January, 1689. At our church (the next day was set for a thanksgiving for deliverance by the Prince of Orange, with prayers specially written for the occasion), our lecturer gave a sincere sermon in the afternoon, emphasizing our duty to God for the numerous significant rescues of our Church, without addressing any political matters.
6th February, 1689. The King's coronation day was ordered not to be observed, as hitherto it had been.
6th February, 1689. The King's coronation day was decided not to be celebrated, as it had been in the past.
The Convention of the Lords and Commons now declare the Prince and Princess of Orange King and Queen of England, France, and Ireland (Scotland being an independent kingdom), the Prince and Princess being to enjoy it jointly during their lives; but the executive authority to be vested in the Prince during life, though all proceedings to run in both names, and that it should descend to their issue, and for want of such, to the Princess Anne of Denmark and her issue, and in want of such, to the heirs of the body of the Prince, if he[Pg 289] survive, and that failing, to devolve to the Parliament, as they should think fit. These produced a conference with the Lords, when also there was presented heads of such new laws as were to be enacted. It is thought on these conditions they will be proclaimed.
The Convention of the Lords and Commons now declares the Prince and Princess of Orange King and Queen of England, France, and Ireland (with Scotland being its own independent kingdom), with the Prince and Princess sharing the title during their lifetimes; however, the executive authority will be held by the Prince during his life, while all proceedings will be in both their names. This title will be inherited by their offspring, and if they don’t have any, it will go to Princess Anne of Denmark and her children, and if there are none from her, it will go to the heirs of the Prince, as long as he outlives them; if not, it will go to the Parliament, which can decide how to handle it. These discussions led to a meeting with the Lords, where proposals for new laws to be enacted were also presented. It is anticipated that they will be proclaimed under these conditions.
There was much contest about the King's abdication, and whether he had vacated the government. The Earl of Nottingham and about twenty Lords, and many Bishops, entered their protests, but the concurrence was great against them.
There was a lot of debate about the King's abdication and whether he had truly left the government. The Earl of Nottingham and around twenty Lords, along with many Bishops, submitted their protests, but there was overwhelming support against them.
The Princess hourly expected. Forces sending to Ireland, that kingdom being in great danger by the Earl of Tyrconnel's army, and expectations from France coming to assist them, but that King was busy in invading Flanders, and encountering the German Princes. It is likely that this will be the most remarkable summer for action, which has happened in many years.
The Princess was waiting anxiously. Troops were being sent to Ireland because that kingdom was in serious danger from the Earl of Tyrconnel's army, with hopes for support coming from France. However, that King was occupied with invading Flanders and dealing with the German princes. It seems this summer will be the most notable for military action we've seen in many years.
21st February, 1689. Dr. Burnet preached at St. James's on the obligation to walk worthy of God's particular and signal deliverance of the nation and church.
21st February, 1689. Dr. Burnet preached at St. James's about the duty to live in a way that honors God's special and notable deliverance of the nation and the church.
I saw the new Queen and King proclaimed the very next day after her coming to Whitehall, Wednesday, 13th February, with great acclamation and general good reception. Bonfires, bells, guns, etc. It was believed that both, especially the Princess, would have shown some (seeming) reluctance at least, of assuming her father's crown, and made some apology, testifying by her regret that he should by his mismanagement necessitate the nation to so extraordinary a proceeding, which would have shown very handsomely to the world, and according to the character given of her piety; consonant also to her husband's first declaration, that there was no intention of deposing the King, but of succoring the nation; but nothing of all this appeared; she came into Whitehall laughing and jolly, as to a wedding, so as to seem quite transported. She rose early the next morning, and in her undress, as it was reported, before her women were up, went about from room to room to see the convenience of Whitehall; lay in the same bed and apartment where the late Queen lay, and within a night or two sat down to play at basset, as the Queen, her predecessor used to do. She smiled upon and talked to everybody, so that no change seemed to have taken place at Court since her[Pg 290] last going away, save that infinite crowds of people thronged to see her, and that she went to our prayers. This carriage was censured by many. She seems to be of a good nature, and that she takes nothing to heart: while the Prince, her husband, has a thoughtful countenance, is wonderfully serious and silent, and seems to treat all persons alike gravely, and to be very intent on affairs: Holland, Ireland, and France calling for his care.
I saw the new queen and Monarch announced the very next day after her arrival at Whitehall, Wednesday, February 13th, with great cheers and a warm welcome. There were bonfires, bells, guns, etc. People thought that both, especially the Princess, would show some reluctance at least about taking her father's crown and would apologize, expressing regret that his mistakes forced the nation into such an unusual situation. This would have presented a dignified image to the world and aligned with her reputation for piety; it would also have matched her husband's initial statement that there was no plan to depose the King, but rather to support the nation. However, none of this was evident; she came into Whitehall laughing and cheerful, as if it were a wedding, appearing completely overjoyed. She woke up early the next morning and, as reported, before her ladies-in-waiting were up, she went around checking out the comforts of Whitehall; she slept in the same bed and room where the late Queen used to stay, and within a night or two, she sat down to play basset, just like her predecessor did. She smiled at and chatted with everyone, so it felt like nothing had changed at Court since her last departure, except that huge crowds flocked to see her and she attended our prayers. Many criticized her behavior. She seems to have a good nature and doesn’t appear to take things too seriously, while the Prince, her husband, has a thoughtful expression, is very serious and quiet, and treats everyone with the same gravity, appearing very focused on matters concerning Holland, Ireland, and France.
Divers Bishops and Noblemen are not at all satisfied with this so sudden assumption of the Crown, without any previous sending, and offering some conditions to the absent King; or on his not returning, or not assenting to those conditions, to have proclaimed him Regent; but the major part of both Houses prevailed to make them King and Queen immediately, and a crown was tempting. This was opposed and spoken against with such vehemence by Lord Clarendon (her own uncle), that it put him by all preferment, which must doubtless have been as great as could have been given him. My Lord of Rochester, his brother, overshot himself, by the same carriage and stiffness, which their friends thought they might have well spared when they saw how it was like to be overruled, and that it had been sufficient to have declared their dissent with less passion, acquiescing in due time.
Various bishops and noblemen are very unhappy with the sudden decision to take the Crown without first reaching out to the absent King or presenting some conditions. They feel it would have been better to declare him Regent if he didn't return or agree to those conditions. However, most members of both Houses insisted on making them King and Queen right away, and the allure of the crown was hard to resist. Lord Clarendon, her own uncle, opposed this with such force that it cost him any chance of advancement, which could have been significant. Likewise, Lord Rochester, his brother, also shot himself in the foot with his stubbornness, and their supporters felt that they could have avoided that outcome. They believed it would have been enough to express their disagreement with less intensity and to eventually go along with the decision.
The Archbishop of Canterbury and some of the rest, on scruple of conscience and to salve the oaths they had taken, entered their protests and hung off, especially the Archbishop, who had not all this while so much as appeared out of Lambeth. This occasioned the wonder of many who observed with what zeal they contributed to the Prince's expedition, and all the while also rejecting any proposals of sending again to the absent King; that they should now raise scruples, and such as created much division among the people, greatly rejoicing the old courtiers, and especially the Papists.
The Archbishop of Canterbury and some others, out of concern for their conscience and to fulfill the oaths they had taken, made their objections and withdrew, especially the Archbishop, who hadn’t even left Lambeth during this whole time. This surprised many who noticed how enthusiastically they supported the Prince's mission, while at the same time dismissing any suggestions to reach out to the absent King. Now, they were raising concerns that caused significant division among the people, which greatly pleased the old courtiers, especially the Catholics.
Another objection was, the invalidity of what was done by a convention only, and the as yet unabrogated laws; this drew them to make themselves on the 22d [February] a Parliament, the new King passing the act with the crown on his head. The lawyers disputed, but necessity prevailed, the government requiring a speedy settlement.[Pg 291]
Another objection was the invalidity of what was accomplished by a convention alone, along with the laws that had not yet been repealed; this prompted them to declare themselves a Parliament on February 22nd, with the new King endorsing the act while wearing the crown. The lawyers debated, but necessity took over, as the government needed a quick resolution.[Pg 291]
Innumerable were the crowds, who solicited for, and expected offices; most of the old ones were turned out. Two or three white staves were disposed of some days before, as Lord Steward, to the Earl of Devonshire; Treasurer of the household, to Lord Newport; Lord Chamberlain to the King, to my Lord of Dorset; but there were as yet none in offices of the civil government save the Marquis of Halifax as Privy Seal. A council of thirty was chosen, Lord Derby president, but neither Chancellor nor Judges were yet declared, the new Great Seal not yet finished.
The crowds were countless, all seeking and expecting positions; most of the old officials were replaced. A couple of white staves had been given out a few days earlier, with the Earl of Devonshire becoming Lord Steward, Lord Newport as Treasurer of the household, and my Lord of Dorset as Lord Chamberlain to the King; however, there were still no appointments in civil government except for the Marquis of Halifax as Privy Seal. A council of thirty was formed, with Lord Derby as president, but neither the Chancellor nor the Judges had been appointed yet, as the new Great Seal was still unfinished.
8th March, 1689. Dr. Tillotson, Dean of Canterbury, made an excellent discourse on Matt. v. 44, exhorting to charity and forgiveness of enemies; I suppose purposely, the new Parliament being furious about impeaching those who were obnoxious, and as their custom has ever been, going on violently, without reserve, or modification, while wise men were of opinion the most notorious offenders being named and excepted, an Act of Amnesty would be more seasonable, to pacify the minds of men in so general a discontent of the nation, especially of those who did not expect to see the government assumed without any regard to the absent King, or proving a spontaneous abdication, or that the birth of the Prince of Wales was an imposture; five of the Bishops also still refusing to take the new oath.
8th March, 1689. Dr. Tillotson, Dean of Canterbury, gave an excellent speech on Matthew 5:44, urging charity and forgiveness towards enemies. I assume this was intentional, given that the new Parliament was furious about impeaching those they didn't like, and as they usually do, they proceeded aggressively, without holding back or considering alternatives. Meanwhile, wise people believed that naming the most notorious offenders and excluding them could lead to a more timely Act of Amnesty, to calm the widespread discontent in the nation. This was especially true for those who didn't expect the government to be taken over without any regard for the absent King or the legitimacy of the Prince of Wales, and five of the Bishops were still refusing to take the new oath.
In the meantime, to gratify the people, the hearth-tax was remitted forever; but what was intended to supply it, besides present great taxes on land, is not named.
In the meantime, to please the people, the hearth tax was canceled for good; however, what's meant to replace it, apart from the existing heavy taxes on land, isn't mentioned.
The King abroad was now furnished by the French King with money and officers for an expedition to Ireland. The great neglect in not more timely preventing that from hence, and the disturbances in Scotland, give apprehensions of great difficulties, before any settlement can be perfected here, while the Parliament dispose of the great offices among themselves. The Great Seal, Treasury and Admiralty put into commission of many unexpected persons, to gratify the more; so that by the present appearance of things (unless God Almighty graciously interpose and give success in Ireland and settle Scotland) more trouble seems to threaten the nation than could be expected. In the interim, the new King refers all to the Parliament in the most popular manner, but[Pg 292] is very slow in providing against all these menaces, besides finding difficulties in raising men to send abroad; the former army, which had never seen any service hitherto, receiving their pay and passing their summer in an idle scene of a camp at Hounslow, unwilling to engage, and many disaffected, and scarce to be trusted.
The King overseas was now provided by the French King with money and officers for a campaign in Ireland. The major oversight in not preventing this sooner, along with the unrest in Scotland, raises fears of significant challenges before any resolution can be achieved here, while Parliament distributes the major positions among themselves. The Great Seal, Treasury, and Admiralty have been handed over to many unexpected individuals for their own satisfaction, which suggests that, given the current situation (unless God Almighty kindly intervenes and ensures success in Ireland and stabilizes Scotland), the nation is facing more trouble than anticipated. Meanwhile, the new King refers everything to Parliament in the most favorable way, but[Pg 292] is very slow to address these threats, in addition to struggling to recruit people to send overseas; the previous army, which has never seen any action, is receiving their pay and spending their summer idly in camp at Hounslow, reluctant to engage, and many members are discontented and hardly trustworthy.
29th March, 1689. The new King much blamed for neglecting Ireland, now likely to be ruined by the Lord Tyrconnel and his Popish party, too strong for the Protestants. Wonderful uncertainty where King James was, whether in France or Ireland. The Scots seem as yet to favor King William, rejecting King James's letter to them, yet declaring nothing positively. Soldiers in England discontented. Parliament preparing the coronation oath. Presbyterians and Dissenters displeased at the vote for preserving the Protestant religion as established by law, without mentioning what they were to have as to indulgence.
29th March, 1689. The new King is heavily criticized for ignoring Ireland, which is likely to be destroyed by Lord Tyrconnel and his Catholic supporters, who are too powerful for the Protestants. There's a lot of uncertainty about King James's whereabouts, whether he is in France or Ireland. The Scots still seem to support King William, rejecting King James's letter to them, but not making any definitive statements. Soldiers in England are unhappy. Parliament is getting ready to prepare the coronation oath. Presbyterians and Dissenters are unhappy with the decision to maintain the Protestant religion as established by law, without mentioning what they would get in terms of indulgence.
The Archbishop of Canterbury and four other Bishops refusing to come to Parliament, it was deliberated whether they should incur Præmunire; but it was thought fit to let this fall, and be connived at, for fear of the people, to whom these Prelates were very dear, for the opposition they had given to Popery.
The Archbishop of Canterbury and four other Bishops refused to attend Parliament, and there was discussion about whether they should face Præmunire; however, it was decided to let this slide and overlook it, out of concern for the public, who held these Prelates in high regard for their opposition to Catholicism.
Court offices distributed among Parliament men. No considerable fleet as yet sent forth. Things far from settled as was expected, by reason of the slothful, sickly temper of the new King, and the Parliament's unmindfulness of Ireland, which is likely to prove a sad omission.
Court offices were allocated among Parliament members. No significant fleet has been sent out yet. Things are far from settled as expected, due to the lethargic and unhealthy disposition of the new King, and the Parliament's negligence towards Ireland, which is likely to be a serious oversight.
The Confederates beat the French out of the Palatinate, which they had most barbarously ruined.
The Confederates drove the French out of the Palatinate, which they had ruthlessly destroyed.
11th April, 1689. I saw the procession to and from the Abbey Church of Westminster, with the great feast in Westminster Hall, at the coronation of King William and Queen Mary. What was different from former coronations, was some alteration in the coronation oath. Dr. Burnet, now made Bishop of Sarum, preached with great applause. The Parliament men had scaffolds and places which took up the one whole side of the Hall. When the King and Queen had dined, the ceremony of the Champion, and other services by tenure were performed. The Parliament men were feasted in the Exchequer chamber, and had each of them a gold medal[Pg 293] given them, worth five-and-forty shillings. On the one side were the effigies of the King and Queen inclining one to the other; on the reverse was Jupiter throwing a bolt at Phäeton the words, "Ne totus absumatur": which was but dull, seeing they might have had out of the poet something as apposite. The sculpture was very mean.
11th April, 1689. I witnessed the procession to and from Westminster Abbey, along with the grand feast in Westminster Hall, at the coronation of King William and Queen Mary. What set this coronation apart from previous ones was a change in the coronation oath. Dr. Burnet, now the Bishop of Sarum, preached to great acclaim. The members of Parliament had scaffolding and seats that occupied an entire side of the Hall. After the King and Queen had their meal, the ceremony of the Champion, along with other feudal services, took place. The Parliament members were treated to a feast in the Exchequer chamber and each received a gold medal[Pg 293] worth forty-five shillings. On one side were the images of the King and Queen leaning toward each other; on the other side was Jupiter throwing a bolt at Phaeton with the words, "Ne totus absumatur": which felt uninspired, as they could have chosen something more fitting from the poet. The sculpture was quite mediocre.
Much of the splendor of the proceeding was abated by the absence of divers who should have contributed to it, there being but five Bishops, four Judges (no more being yet sworn), and several noblemen and great ladies wanting; the feast, however, was magnificent. The next day the House of Commons went and kissed their new Majesties' hands in the Banqueting House.
Much of the grandeur of the event was diminished by the absence of various individuals who should have been there to participate, with only five Bishops, four Judges (no more having been sworn in yet), and several noblemen and esteemed ladies missing; however, the feast was still magnificent. The next day, the House of Commons went and kissed the hands of their new Majesties in the Banqueting House.
12th April, 1689. I went with the Bishop of St. Asaph to visit my Lord of Canterbury at Lambeth, who had excused himself from officiating at the coronation, which was performed by the Bishop of London, assisted by the Archbishop of York. We had much private and free discourse with his Grace concerning several things relating to the Church, there being now a bill of comprehension to be brought from the Lords to the Commons. I urged that when they went about to reform some particulars in the Liturgy, Church discipline, Canons, etc., the baptizing in private houses without necessity might be reformed, as likewise so frequent burials in churches; the one proceeding much from the pride of women, bringing that into custom which was only indulged in case of imminent danger, and out of necessity during the rebellion, and persecution of the clergy in our late civil wars; the other from the avarice of ministers, who, in some opulent parishes, made almost as much of permission to bury in the chancel and the church, as of their livings, and were paid with considerable advantage and gifts for baptizing in chambers. To this they heartily assented, and promised their endeavor to get it reformed, utterly disliking both practices as novel and indecent.
12th April, 1689. I went with the Bishop of St. Asaph to visit the Archbishop of Canterbury at Lambeth, who had declined to officiate at the coronation, which was carried out by the Bishop of London, with assistance from the Archbishop of York. We had a lot of private and open discussion with His Grace about various issues related to the Church, as there was a bill of comprehension set to be presented from the Lords to the Commons. I emphasized that as they looked to reform some aspects of the Liturgy, Church discipline, Canons, etc., they should consider revising the practice of baptizing in private homes without necessity, as well as the frequent burials in churches; the former largely stemmed from women’s pride, creating a custom that was only permitted in cases of imminent danger and out of necessity during the rebellion and persecution of clergy in our recent civil wars; the latter was driven by the greed of ministers, who, in some wealthy parishes, profited significantly from allowing burials in the chancel and church, and were well-compensated with gifts for baptizing in living rooms. They wholeheartedly agreed and promised to work towards reforming these practices, strongly disapproving of both as new and inappropriate.
We discoursed likewise of the great disturbance and prejudice it might cause, should the new oath, now on the anvil, be imposed on any, save such as were in new office, without any retrospect to such as either had no office, or had been long in office, who it was likely would have some scruples about taking a new oath, having[Pg 294] already sworn fidelity to the government as established by law. This we all knew to be the case of my Lord Archbishop of Canterbury, and some other persons who were not so fully satisfied with the Convention making it an abdication of King James, to whom they had sworn allegiance.
We also talked about the major issues and problems it could create if the new oath, which is currently being discussed, is required from anyone except those in new positions, without considering those who either have no position or have been in their roles for a long time. These individuals might have concerns about taking a new oath since they have already pledged loyalty to the government as it was established by law. We all understood that this applied to my Lord Archbishop of Canterbury and some others who were not completely comfortable with the Convention declaring it an abdication of King James, to whom they had sworn allegiance.
King James was now certainly in Ireland with the Marshal d'Estrades, whom he made a Privy Councillor; and who caused the King to remove the Protestant Councillors, some whereof, it seems, had continued to sit, telling him that the King of France, his master, would never assist him if he did not immediately do it; by which it is apparent how the poor Prince is managed by the French.
King James was definitely in Ireland now with Marshal d'Estrades, whom he appointed as a Privy Councillor. D'Estrades urged the King to get rid of the Protestant Councillors, some of whom, it seems, had still been in attendance. He told the King that his master, the King of France, would never help him if he didn’t take action right away. This shows how the unfortunate Prince is being controlled by the French.
Scotland declares for King William and Queen Mary, with the reasons of their setting aside King James, not as abdicating, but forfeiting his right by maladministration; they proceeded with much more caution and prudence than we did, who precipitated all things to the great reproach of the nation, all which had been managed by some crafty, ill-principled men. The new Privy Council have a Republican spirit, manifestly undermining all future succession of the Crown and prosperity of the Church of England, which yet I hope they will not be able to accomplish so soon as they expect, though they get into all places of trust and profit.
Scotland supports King William and Queen Mary, stating that they set aside King James not by abdication, but because he forfeited his right due to maladministration; they acted with much more caution and wisdom than we did, who rushed into everything to the great shame of the nation, all of which was orchestrated by some cunning, unprincipled individuals. The new Privy Council has a Republican attitude, clearly undermining the future succession of the Crown and the prosperity of the Church of England, which I still hope they won’t be able to achieve as quickly as they think, even though they are entering all positions of trust and profit.
21st April, 1689. This was one of the most seasonable springs, free from the usual sharp east winds that I have observed since the year 1660 (the year of the Restoration), which was much such an one.
21st April, 1689. This has been one of the most pleasant springs, free from the typical harsh east winds that I've seen since 1660 (the year of the Restoration), which was quite similar.
26th April, 1689. I heard the lawyers plead before the Lords the writ of error in the judgment of Oates, as to the charge against him of perjury, which after debate they referred to the answer of Holloway, etc., who were his judges. I then went with the Bishop of St. Asaph to the Archbishop at Lambeth, where they entered into discourse concerning the final destruction of Antichrist, both concluding that the third trumpet and vial were now pouring out. My Lord St. Asaph considered the killing of the two witnesses, to be the utter destruction of the Cevennes Protestants by the French and Duke of Savoy, and the other the Waldenses and Pyrenean Christians, who by all appearance from good history had kept the[Pg 295] primitive faith from the very Apostles' time till now. The doubt his Grace suggested was, whether it could be made evident that the present persecution had made so great a havoc of those faithful people as of the other, and whether there were not yet some among them in being who met together, it being stated from the text, Apoc. xi., that they should both be slain together. They both much approved of Mr. Mede's way of interpretation, and that he only failed in resolving too hastily on the King of Sweden's (Gustavus Adolphus) success in Germany. They agreed that it would be good to employ some intelligent French minister to travel as far as the Pyrenees to understand the present state of the Church there, it being a country where hardly anyone travels.
26th April, 1689. I listened to the lawyers present their case before the Lords regarding the writ of error in Oates’ judgment concerning the charge of perjury. After some discussion, they referred it to the response of Holloway and others, who were his judges. I then went with the Bishop of St. Asaph to the Archbishop at Lambeth, where they talked about the ultimate downfall of Antichrist, both agreeing that the third trumpet and vial were currently being unleashed. My Lord St. Asaph viewed the killing of the two witnesses as symbolic of the complete destruction of the Cevennes Protestants by the French and the Duke of Savoy, along with the Waldenses and Pyrenean Christians, who, according to credible history, had preserved the original faith since the time of the Apostles. His Grace raised the question of whether it could be proven that the ongoing persecution had caused as much devastation to those faithful people as it had to the others, and whether there were still some among them who were alive and gathered, referencing the text from Apoc. xi., which states that they would both be killed together. They both highly regarded Mr. Mede's interpretation approach, agreeing that his only misstep was in prematurely concluding the King of Sweden's success in Germany. They concurred that it would be beneficial to send a knowledgeable French minister to travel as far as the Pyrenees to assess the current state of the Church there, as it is a region that few people visit.
There now came certain news that King James had not only landed in Ireland, but that he had surprised Londonderry, and was become master of that kingdom, to the great shame of our government, who had been so often solicited to provide against it by timely succor, and which they might so easily have done. This is a terrible beginning of more troubles, especially should an army come thence into Scotland, people being generally disaffected here and everywhere else, so that the seamen and landmen would scarce serve without compulsion.
There were reports that King James had not only arrived in Ireland but had also taken Londonderry by surprise, gaining control over that kingdom. This was a huge embarrassment for our government, which had repeatedly been urged to take action and provide support in time, something they could have done easily. This is a troubling start to more issues, especially if an army moves from there into Scotland, as people here and elsewhere are generally unhappy, making it likely that both sailors and soldiers would hesitate to serve without being forced.
A new oath was now fabricating for all the clergy to take, of obedience to the present Government, in abrogation of the former oaths of allegiance, which it is foreseen many of the bishops and others of the clergy will not take. The penalty is to be the loss of their dignity and spiritual preferment. This is thought to have been driven on by the Presbyterians, our new governors. God in mercy send us help, and direct the counsels to his glory and good of his Church!
A new oath is now being created for all clergy to pledge obedience to the current government, replacing the previous oaths of allegiance, which many bishops and other clergy are expected to refuse. The penalty for refusal will be the loss of their status and spiritual benefits. This move is believed to have been pushed by the Presbyterians, our new leaders. May God in His mercy provide us with help and guide the decisions for His glory and the good of His Church!
Public matters went very ill in Ireland: confusion and dissensions among ourselves, stupidity, inconstancy, emulation, the governors employing unskillful men in greatest offices, no person of public spirit and ability appearing,—threaten us with a very sad prospect of what may be the conclusion, without God's infinite mercy.
Public affairs were going very poorly in Ireland: we were facing confusion and disagreements among ourselves, ignorance, inconsistency, competition, and the leaders appointing unqualified individuals to high positions, with no one showing public spirit or capability. This paints a bleak picture of what the future might hold, unless we receive God's boundless mercy.
A fight by Admiral Herbert with the French, he imprudently setting on them in a creek as they were landing men in Ireland, by which we came off with great slaughter and little honor—so strangely negligent and[Pg 296] remiss were we in preparing a timely and sufficient fleet. The Scots Commissioners offer the crown to the new King and Queen on conditions.—Act of Poll-money came forth, sparing none.—Now appeared the Act of Indulgence for the Dissenters, but not exempting them from paying dues to the Church of England clergy, or serving in office according to law, with several other clauses.—A most splendid embassy from Holland to congratulate the King and Queen on their accession to the crown.
A battle led by Admiral Herbert against the French, where he foolishly attacked them in a creek while they were landing troops in Ireland, resulted in heavy losses for us and little honor—our preparations for a timely and adequate fleet were surprisingly careless and negligent. The Scottish Commissioners offered the crown to the new King and Queen with certain conditions. The Act of Poll-money was introduced, affecting everyone. Then the Act of Indulgence for the Dissenters was presented, but it didn't exempt them from paying dues to the Church of England clergy or serving in office as required by law, along with several other stipulations. A grand delegation from Holland arrived to congratulate the King and Queen on their accession to the throne.
4th June, 1689. A solemn fast for success of the fleet, etc.
4th June, 1689. A serious day of fasting for the success of the fleet, etc.
6th June, 1689. I dined with the Bishop of Asaph; Monsieur Capellus, the learned son of the most learned Ludovicus, presented to him his father's works, not published till now.
6th June, 1689. I had dinner with the Bishop of Asaph; Monsieur Capellus, the knowledgeable son of the very learned Ludovicus, presented to him his father's works, which had not been published until now.
7th June, 1689. I visited the Archbishop of Canterbury, and stayed with him till about seven o'clock. He read to me the Pope's excommunication of the French King.
7th June, 1689. I visited the Archbishop of Canterbury and stayed with him until about seven o'clock. He read to me the Pope's excommunication of the French King.
9th June, 1689. Visited Dr. Burnet, now Bishop of Sarum; got him to let Mr. Kneller draw his picture.
9th June, 1689. Visited Dr. Burnet, now Bishop of Sarum; asked him to have Mr. Kneller sketch his portrait.
16th June, 1689. King James's declaration was now dispersed, offering pardon to all, if on his landing, or within twenty days after, they should return to their obedience.
16th June, 1689. King James's declaration was now spread widely, offering forgiveness to everyone if they returned to their loyalty upon his arrival or within twenty days afterward.
Our fleet not yet at sea, through some prodigious sloth, and men minding only their present interest; the French riding masters at sea, taking many great prizes to our wonderful reproach. No certain news from Ireland; various reports of Scotland; discontents at home. The King of Denmark at last joins with the Confederates, and the two Northern Powers are reconciled. The East India Company likely to be dissolved by Parliament for many arbitrary actions. Oates acquitted of perjury, to all honest men's admiration.
Our fleet isn't at sea yet, thanks to some incredible laziness and people only looking out for their own interests; meanwhile, the French sailing masters are at sea, taking a lot of valuable prizes, making us look bad. There's no reliable news from Ireland, and there are mixed reports coming from Scotland; there's dissatisfaction at home. The King of Denmark has finally teamed up with the Confederates, and the two Northern Powers have made peace. The East India Company is likely to be shut down by Parliament due to various unreasonable actions. Oates has been cleared of perjury, which astonishes all decent people.
20th June, 1689. News of A PLOT discovered, on which divers were sent to the Tower and secured.
20th June, 1689. News of A STORYLINE uncovered, leading to several people being sent to the Tower and detained.
23d June, 1689. An extraordinary drought, to the threatening of great wants as to the fruits of the earth.
23rd June, 1689. An unusual drought, posing a serious threat to the availability of crops.
8th July, 1689. I sat for my picture to Mr. Kneller, for Mr. Pepys, late Secretary to the Admiralty, holding my "Sylva" in my right hand. It was on his long and earnest request, and is placed in his library. Kneller never painted in a more masterly manner.[Pg 297]
8th July, 1689. I posed for my portrait by Mr. Kneller, for Mr. Pepys, the former Secretary to the Admiralty, holding my "Sylva" in my right hand. It was at his persistent and sincere request, and it’s now in his library. Kneller never painted with more skill.[Pg 297]
11th July, 1689. I dined at Lord Clarendon's, it being his lady's wedding day, when about three in the afternoon there was an unusual and violent storm of thunder, rain, and wind; many boats on the Thames were overwhelmed, and such was the impetuosity of the wind as to carry up the waves in pillars and spouts most dreadful to behold, rooting up trees and ruining some houses. The Countess of Sunderland afterward told me that it extended as far as Althorpe at the very time, which is seventy miles from London. It did no harm at Deptford, but at Greenwich it did much mischief.
11th July, 1689. I had dinner at Lord Clarendon's to celebrate his lady's wedding day. Around three in the afternoon, there was an unusual and violent storm with thunder, heavy rain, and strong winds. Many boats on the Thames were capsized, and the ferocity of the wind lifted the waves into terrifying pillars and spouts. It uprooted trees and damaged several houses. The Countess of Sunderland later told me that the storm reached as far as Althorpe at the same time, which is seventy miles from London. It didn’t cause any damage at Deptford, but it wreaked havoc at Greenwich.
16th July, 1689. I went to Hampton Court about business, the Council being there. A great apartment and spacious garden with fountains was beginning in the park at the head of the canal.
16th July, 1689. I went to Hampton Court for some work, as the Council was meeting there. A large room and a big garden with fountains were being built in the park at the beginning of the canal.
19th July, 1689. The Marshal de Schomberg went now as General toward Ireland, to the relief of Londonderry. Our fleet lay before Brest. The Confederates passing the Rhine, besiege Bonn and Mayence, to obtain a passage into France. A great victory gotten by the Muscovites, taking and burning Perecop. A new rebel against the Turks threatens the destruction of that tyranny. All Europe in arms against France, and hardly to be found in history so universal a face of war.
19th July, 1689. Marshal de Schomberg is now heading to Ireland as General to assist Londonderry. Our fleet is positioned off Brest. The Confederates have crossed the Rhine to besiege Bonn and Mayence in hopes of gaining access to France. The Muscovites achieved a significant victory by capturing and burning Perecop. A new rebel is rising against the Turks, threatening to dismantle that tyranny. All of Europe is mobilizing against France, and it's rare to see such widespread war throughout history.
The Convention (or Parliament as some called it) sitting, exempt the Duke of Hanover from the succession to the crown, which they seem to confine to the present new King, his wife, and Princess Anne of Denmark, who is so monstrously swollen, that it is doubted whether her being thought with child may prove a TYMPANY only, so that the unhappy family of the Stuarts seems to be extinguishing; and then what government is likely to be next set up is unknown, whether regal and by election, or otherwise, the Republicans and Dissenters from the Church of England evidently looking that way.
The Convention (or Parliament, as some referred to it) is meeting to exclude the Duke of Hanover from the line of succession to the crown. They seem to limit it to the current King, his wife, and Princess Anne of Denmark, who is so excessively swollen that there are doubts whether she is truly pregnant or just experiencing a TYMPANY. As a result, the unfortunate family of the Stuarts appears to be fading away, and it’s uncertain what kind of government might be established next—whether it will be a monarchy or an elected one—especially since Republicans and those dissenting from the Church of England seem to be leaning in that direction.
The Scots have now again voted down Episcopacy there. Great discontents through this nation at the slow proceedings of the King, and the incompetent instruments and officers he advances to the greatest and most necessary charges.
The Scots have once again rejected Episcopacy there. There’s a lot of frustration across the nation regarding the King's slow actions and the unqualified people he promotes to important and essential positions.
23d August, 1689. Came to visit me Mr. Firmin.[Pg 298]
23rd August, 1689. Mr. Firmin came to visit me.[Pg 298]
25th August, 1689. Hitherto it has been a most seasonable summer. Londonderry relieved after a brave and wonderful holding out.
25th August, 1689. So far, it has been a very pleasant summer. Londonderry has been relieved after a courageous and remarkable defense.
21st September, 1689. I went to visit the Archbishop of Canterbury since his suspension, and was received with great kindness. A dreadful fire happened in Southwark.
21st September, 1689. I went to visit the Archbishop of Canterbury since his suspension, and was received with great kindness. A terrible fire happened in Southwark.
2d October, 1689. Came to visit us the Marquis de Ruvignè, and one Monsieur le Coque, a French refugee, who left great riches for his religion; a very learned, civil person; he married the sister of the Duchess de la Force. Ottobone, a Venetian Cardinal, eighty years old, made Pope.72
2nd October, 1689. The Marquis de Ruvignè visited us, along with Monsieur le Coque, a French refugee who gave up great wealth for his faith; he is a very educated and polite person; he is married to the sister of the Duchess de la Force. Ottobone, a Venetian Cardinal, eighty years old, became Pope.72
31st October, 1689. My birthday, being now sixty-nine years old. Blessed Father, who hast prolonged my years to this great age, and given me to see so great and wonderful revolutions, and preserved me amid them to this moment, accept, I beseech thee, the continuance of my prayers and thankful acknowledgments, and grant me grace to be working out my salvation and redeeming the time, that thou mayst be glorified by me here, and my immortal soul saved whenever thou shalt call for it, to perpetuate thy praises to all eternity, in that heavenly kingdom where there are no more changes or vicissitudes, but rest, and peace, and joy, and consummate felicity, forever. Grant this, O heavenly Father, for the sake of Jesus thine only Son and our Savior. Amen!
31st October, 1689. Today is my birthday, and I’m now sixty-nine years old. Blessed Father, thank you for extending my life to this age and allowing me to witness such significant and amazing changes, while keeping me safe through them all until now. I ask you to accept my ongoing prayers and gratitude, and please give me the strength to work on my salvation and make the most of my time, so that you may be glorified through me here, and my soul may be saved whenever you call for it, to proclaim your praises for all eternity in that heavenly kingdom where there are no more changes or upheavals, only rest, peace, joy, and complete happiness, forever. Please grant this, O heavenly Father, for the sake of Jesus, your only Son and our Savior. Amen!
5th November, 1689. The Bishop of St. Asaph, Lord Almoner, preached before the King and Queen, the whole discourse being an historical narrative of the Church of England's several deliverances, especially that of this anniversary, signalized by being also the birthday of the Prince of Orange, his marriage (which was on the 4th), and his landing at Torbay this day. There was a splendid ball and other rejoicings.
5th November, 1689. The Bishop of St. Asaph, Lord Almoner, delivered a sermon in front of the King and Queen. The entire message was a historical account of the various times the Church of England has been saved, especially highlighting this date, which is significant for being both the anniversary and the birthday of the Prince of Orange, as well as the celebration of his marriage (which took place on the 4th) and his arrival at Torbay today. There was a magnificent ball and other festivities.
10th November, 1689. After a very wet season, the winter came on severely.
10th November, 1689. After a very rainy season, winter hit hard.
17th November, 1689. Much wet, without frost, yet the wind north and easterly. A Convocation of the Clergy meet about a reformation of our Liturgy, Canons, etc., obstructed by others of the clergy.[Pg 299]
17th November, 1689. It’s very wet, but not freezing, with the wind coming from the north and east. A gathering of the clergy is happening to discuss reforming our liturgy, canons, etc., but there are some clergy members who are blocking progress.[Pg 299]
27th November, 1689. I went to London with my family, to winter at Soho, in the great square.
27th November, 1689. I went to London with my family to spend the winter in Soho, in the large square.
11th January, 1689-90. This night there was a most extraordinary storm of wind, accompanied with snow and sharp weather; it did great harm in many places, blowing down houses, trees, etc., killing many people. It began about two in the morning, and lasted till five, being a kind of hurricane, which mariners observe have begun of late years to come northward. This winter has been hitherto extremely wet, warm, and windy.
11th January, 1689-90. Tonight there was an incredible storm with strong winds, along with snow and harsh weather; it caused significant damage in many areas, knocking down houses and trees, and resulting in many deaths. It started around two in the morning and lasted until five, resembling a hurricane, which sailors have noticed has been moving northward in recent years. This winter has been unusually wet, warm, and windy so far.
12th January, 1690. There was read at St. Ann's Church an exhortatory letter to the clergy of London from the Bishop, together with a Brief for relieving the distressed Protestants, and Vaudois, who fled from the persecution of the French and Duke of Savoy, to the Protestant Cantons of Switzerland.
12th January, 1690. At St. Ann's Church, an encouraging letter to the clergy of London was read from the Bishop, along with a Brief to support the distressed Protestants and Vaudois who fled from persecution by the French and the Duke of Savoy to the Protestant cantons of Switzerland.
The Parliament was unexpectedly prorogued to 2d of April to the discontent and surprise of many members who, being exceedingly averse to the settling of anything, proceeding with animosities, multiplying exceptions against those whom they pronounced obnoxious, and producing as universal a discontent against King William and themselves, as there was before against King James. The new King resolved on an expedition into Ireland in person. About 150 of the members who were of the more royal party, meeting at a feast at the Apollo Tavern near St. Dunstan's, sent some of their company to the King, to assure him of their service; he returned his thanks, advising them to repair to their several counties and preserve the peace during his absence, and assuring them that he would be steady to his resolution of defending the Laws and Religion established. The great Lord suspected to have counselled this prorogation, universally denied it. However, it was believed the chief adviser was the Marquis of Carmarthen, who now seemed to be most in favor.
The Parliament was unexpectedly suspended until April 2nd, causing dissatisfaction and surprise among many members who were strongly opposed to settling any issues. They continued to hold grudges, piling on objections against those they deemed objectionable, creating a widespread discontent against King William and themselves, similar to the resentment that had existed before against King James. The new King decided to personally lead an expedition into Ireland. About 150 members from the more royal faction gathered for a feast at the Apollo Tavern near St. Dunstan's and sent some of their group to the King to express their support. He thanked them and advised them to return to their counties and maintain peace during his absence, assuring them he would remain committed to upholding the established laws and religion. The prominent lord suspected of suggesting this suspension denied it outright. However, it was widely believed that the main adviser was the Marquis of Carmarthen, who now appeared to be holding the most favor.
2d February, 1690. The Parliament was dissolved by proclamation, and another called to meet the 20th of March. This was a second surprise to the former members; and now the Court party, or, as they call themselves, Church of England, are making their interests in the country. The Marquis of Halifax lays down his office of Privy Seal, and pretends to retire.[Pg 300]
2nd February, 1690. The Parliament was dissolved by proclamation, and another was scheduled to meet on the 20th of March. This was another shock to the previous members; meanwhile, the Court party, who refer to themselves as the Church of England, are working on their interests in the country. The Marquis of Halifax resigns from his position as Privy Seal and claims he is stepping back.[Pg 300]
16th February, 1690. The Duchess of Monmouth's chaplain preached at St. Martin's an excellent discourse exhorting to peace and sanctity, it being now the time of very great division and dissension in the nation; first, among the Churchmen, of whom the moderate and sober part were for a speedy reformation of divers things, which it was thought might be made in our Liturgy, for the inviting of Dissenters; others more stiff and rigid, were for no condescension at all. Books and pamphlets were published every day pro and con; the Convocation were forced for the present to suspend any further progress. There was fierce and great carousing about being elected in the new Parliament. The King persists in his intention of going in person for Ireland, whither the French are sending supplies to King James, and we, the Danish horse to Schomberg.
February 16, 1690. The Duchess of Monmouth's chaplain delivered an excellent sermon at St. Martin's, urging peace and holiness during a time of significant division and conflict in the nation. This was especially true among clergymen, where the more moderate and reasonable members advocated for a quick reform of various aspects of our Liturgy to welcome Dissenters, while others, more rigid and inflexible, opposed any compromise. Books and pamphlets were being published daily, both in support and against these ideas; the Convocation was currently compelled to pause any further actions. There was intense and passionate debate regarding the elections for the new Parliament. The King remains determined to go to Ireland himself, where the French are sending supplies to King James, and we are sending Danish cavalry to Schomberg.
19th February, 1690. I dined with the Marquis of Carmarthen (late Lord Danby), where was Lieutenant-General Douglas, a very considerate and sober commander, going for Ireland. He related to us the exceeding neglect of the English soldiers, suffering severely for want of clothes and necessaries this winter, exceedingly magnifying their courage and bravery during all their hardships. There dined also Lord Lucas, Lieutenant of the Tower, and the Bishop of St. Asaph. The Privy Seal was again put in commission, Mr. Cheny (who married my kinswoman, Mrs. Pierrepoint), Sir Thomas Knatchbull, and Sir P. W. Pultney. The imprudence of both sexes was now become so great and universal, persons of all ranks keeping their courtesans publicly, that the King had lately directed a letter to the Bishops to order their clergy to preach against that sin, swearing, etc., and to put the ecclesiastical laws in execution without any indulgence.
19th February, 1690. I had dinner with the Marquis of Carmarthen (formerly Lord Danby), where Lieutenant-General Douglas was also present, a very thoughtful and serious commander headed to Ireland. He told us about the extreme neglect of the English soldiers, who were suffering greatly from a lack of clothing and essentials this winter, while greatly praising their courage and bravery despite all their hardships. Also at dinner were Lord Lucas, the Lieutenant of the Tower, and the Bishop of St. Asaph. The Privy Seal was once again put in commission, with Mr. Cheny (who married my relative, Mrs. Pierrepoint), Sir Thomas Knatchbull, and Sir P. W. Pultney involved. The recklessness of both men and women had become so widespread and accepted, with people of all social standings openly keeping mistresses, that the King had recently sent a letter to the Bishops instructing them to tell their clergy to preach against such sins, swearing, etc., and to enforce ecclesiastical laws without any leniency.
7th March, 1690. I dined with Mr. Pepys, late Secretary to the Admiralty, where was that excellent shipwright and seaman (for so he had been, and also a Commission of the Navy), Sir Anthony Deane. Among[Pg 301] other discourse, and deploring the sad condition of our navy, as now governed by inexperienced men since this Revolution, he mentioned what exceeding advantage we of this nation had by being the first who built frigates, the first of which ever built was that vessel which was afterward called "The Constant Warwick," and was the work of Pett of Chatham, for a trial of making a vessel that would sail swiftly; it was built with low decks, the guns lying near the water, and was so light and swift of sailing, that in a short time he told us she had, ere the Dutch war was ended, taken as much money from privateers as would have laden her; and that more such being built, did in a year or two scour the Channel from those of Dunkirk and others which had exceedingly infested it. He added that it would be the best and only infallible expedient to be masters of the sea, and able to destroy the greatest navy of any enemy if, instead of building huge great ships and second and third rates, they would leave off building such high decks, which were for nothing but to gratify gentlemen-commanders, who must have all their effeminate accommodations, and for pomp; that it would be the ruin of our fleets, if such persons were continued in command, they neither having experience nor being capable of learning, because they would not submit to the fatigue and inconvenience which those who were bred seamen would undergo, in those so otherwise useful swift frigates. These being to encounter the greatest ships would be able to protect, set on, and bring off, those who should manage the fire ships, and the Prince who should first store himself with numbers of such fire ships, would, through the help and countenance of such frigates, be able to ruin the greatest force of such vast ships as could be sent to sea, by the dexterity of working those light, swift ships to guard the fire ships. He concluded there would shortly be no other method of seafight; and that great ships and men-of-war, however stored with guns and men, must submit to those who should encounter them with far less number. He represented to us the dreadful effect of these fire ships; that he continually observed in our late maritime war with the Dutch that, when an enemy's fire ship approached, the most valiant commander and common sailors were in such consternation, that though then, of all times, there[Pg 302] was most need of the guns, bombs, etc., to keep the mischief off, they grew pale and astonished, as if of a quite other mean soul, that they slunk about, forsook their guns and work as if in despair, every one looking about to see which way they might get out of their ship, though sure to be drowned if they did so. This he said was likely to prove hereafter the method of seafight, likely to be the misfortune of England if they continued to put gentlemen-commanders over experienced seamen, on account of their ignorance, effeminacy, and insolence.
7th March, 1690. I had dinner with Mr. Pepys, former Secretary to the Admiralty, along with that skilled shipbuilder and sailor, Sir Anthony Deane, who also held a Navy Commission. During our conversation, we lamented the unfortunate state of our navy, now run by inexperienced individuals since the Revolution. He pointed out the significant advantage we had as the first nation to build frigates, with the first one being "The Constant Warwick," crafted by Pett of Chatham as an experiment to create a fast vessel. It was designed with low decks, the guns located close to the water, and was so light and swift that, by the time the Dutch war ended, it had captured enough from privateers to fill its hold. He asserted that building more ships like this would, within a year or two, clear the Channel of Dunkirk’s and other privateers that had plagued us. He added that the best way to dominate the sea and defeat any enemy's large navy would be to stop constructing enormous ships and instead build more nimble vessels, which high decks only served to please gentleman-commanders with their luxurious comforts and show. He warned that continuing to promote such individuals to command would ruin our fleets, as they lacked experience and wouldn’t endure the hardships that true sailors would face in those otherwise effective swift frigates. These vessels could protect, pursue, and assist those operating fire ships, and the Prince who amassed a number of fire ships, backed by such frigates, would be able to defeat even the mightiest fleets with skillful maneuvering. He concluded that soon, this would be the only approach to naval combat, as large ships and warships, no matter how many guns and men they carried, would have to yield to those who faced them with a much smaller force. He illustrated the terrifying impact of fire ships, noting how, during our recent naval conflict with the Dutch, even the bravest commanders and sailors panicked when one approached. At that moment, when their guns and bombs were most needed to fend off the threat, they became pale and alarmed, moving around in a daze and abandoning their posts in despair, each trying to find a way off their ship, even if it meant drowning. He warned that if England continued to place gentleman-commanders over experienced sailors due to their ignorance, softness, and arrogance, this might lead to future misfortunes in battle.
9th March, 1690. Preached at Whitehall Dr. Burnet, late Bishop of Sarum, on Heb. iv. 13, anatomically describing the texture of the eye; and that, as it received such innumerable sorts of spies through so very small a passage to the brain, and that without the least confusion or trouble, and accordingly judged and reflected on them; so God who made this sensory, did with the greatest ease and at once see all that was done through the vast universe, even to the very thought as well as action. This similitude he continued with much perspicuity and aptness; and applied it accordingly, for the admonishing us how uprightly we ought to live and behave ourselves before such an all-seeing Deity; and how we were to conceive of other his attributes, which we could have no idea of than by comparing them by what we were able to conceive of the nature and power of things, which were the objects of our senses; and therefore it was that in Scripture we attribute those actions and affections of God by the same of man, not as adequately or in any proportion like them, but as the only expedient to make some resemblance of his divine perfections; as when the Scripture says, "God will remember the sins of the penitent no more:" not as if God could forget anything, but as intimating he would pass by such penitents and receive them to mercy.
9th March, 1690. Preached at Whitehall, Dr. Burnet, former Bishop of Sarum, on Heb. iv. 13, thoroughly explaining the structure of the eye; and how, despite the tiny opening, it receives countless types of information to the brain without any confusion or trouble, and then judges and reflects on them. Similarly, God, who created this sensory organ, can effortlessly see everything happening throughout the vast universe, including every thought as well as action. He continued this comparison with great clarity and relevance, urging us to consider how we should live and behave before such an all-seeing Deity; and how we ought to understand His other attributes, which we can only grasp by comparing them to what we can comprehend about the nature and power of the things that we sense. This is why in Scripture we describe God's actions and emotions using terms that apply to humans, not to suggest that they are equivalent in any way, but as a way to provide some resemblance to His divine qualities. For instance, when Scripture says, "God will remember the sins of the penitent no more," it doesn't imply that God can forget anything, but rather that He will overlook those who repent and accept them into His mercy.
I dined at the Bishop of St. Asaph's, Almoner to the new Queen, with the famous lawyer Sir George Mackenzie (late Lord Advocate of Scotland), against whom both the Bishop and myself had written and published books, but now most friendly reconciled.73 He related to[Pg 303] us many particulars of Scotland, the present sad condition of it, the inveterate hatred which the Presbyterians show to the family of the Stuarts, and the exceeding tyranny of those bigots who acknowledge no superior on earth, in civil or divine matters, maintaining that the people only have the right of government; their implacable hatred to the Episcopal Order and Church of England. He observed that the first Presbyterian dissents from our discipline were introduced by the Jesuits' order, about the 20 of Queen Elizabeth, a famous Jesuit among them feigning himself a Protestant, and who was the first who began to pray extempore, and brought in that which they since called, and are still so fond of, praying by the Spirit. This Jesuit remained many years before he was discovered, afterward died in Scotland, where he was buried at ... having yet on his monument, "Rosa inter spinas."
I had dinner at the Bishop of St. Asaph's, who is the Almoner to the new Queen, with the well-known lawyer Sir George Mackenzie (formerly the Lord Advocate of Scotland). Both the Bishop and I had previously written and published books against him, but now we are on good terms. He shared many details about Scotland, its current unfortunate state, the deep-seated animosity the Presbyterians have toward the Stuart family, and the extreme tyranny of those fanatics who recognize no authority on earth in civil or spiritual matters, insisting that only the people have the right to govern. He talked about their relentless hatred for the Episcopal Order and the Church of England. He noted that the initial Presbyterian objections to our discipline were introduced by the Jesuit order around the year 1600 during Queen Elizabeth's reign. A notable Jesuit among them pretended to be a Protestant; he was the first to pray spontaneously and introduced what they now call, and still cherish, praying by the Spirit. This Jesuit went undetected for many years, later died in Scotland, where he was buried, and his monument still has the words, "Rosa inter spinas."
11th March, 1690. I went again to see Mr. Charlton's curiosities, both of art and nature, and his full and rare collection of medals, which taken altogether, in all kinds, is doubtless one of the most perfect assemblages of rarities that can be any where seen. I much admired the contortions of the Thea root, which was so perplexed, large, and intricate, and withal hard as box, that it was wonderful to consider. The French have landed in Ireland.
11th March, 1690. I went again to see Mr. Charlton's curiosities, both of art and nature, and his complete and rare collection of medals, which, taken together in all kinds, is undoubtedly one of the most perfect collections of rarities that can be found anywhere. I was really impressed by the twists of the Thea root, which was so tangled, large, and intricate, and also as hard as boxwood, that it was astonishing to think about. The French have landed in Ireland.
16th March, 1690. A public fast.
16th March, 1690. A public fast.
24th May, 1690. City charter restored. Divers exempted from pardon.
24th May, 1690. City charter restored. Several exempted from pardon.
4th June, 1690. King William set forth on his Irish expedition, leaving the Queen Regent.
4th June, 1690. King William left for his Irish campaign, leaving the Queen Regent behind.
10th June, 1690. Mr. Pepys read to me his Remonstrance, showing with what malice and injustice he was suspected with Sir Anthony Deane about the timber, of which the thirty ships were built by a late Act of Parliament, with the exceeding danger which the fleet would shortly be in, by reason of the tyranny and incompetency of those who now managed the Admiralty and affairs of the Navy, of which he gave an accurate state, and showed his great ability.
10th June, 1690. Mr. Pepys read to me his Remonstrance, demonstrating how unfairly he and Sir Anthony Deane were suspected regarding the timber used to build thirty ships under a recent Act of Parliament, highlighting the serious danger the fleet would soon face because of the incompetence and tyranny of those currently running the Admiralty and Navy affairs, which he accurately detailed, showcasing his considerable skill.
18th June, 1690. Fast day. Visited the Bishop of St. Asaph; his conversation was on the Vaudois in Savoy, who had been thought so near destruction and final[Pg 304] extirpation by the French, being totally given up to slaughter, so that there were no hopes for them; but now it pleased God that the Duke of Savoy, who had hitherto joined with the French in their persecution, being now pressed by them to deliver up Saluzzo and Turin as cautionary towns, on suspicion that he might at last come into the Confederacy of the German Princes, did secretly concert measures with, and afterward declared for, them. He then invited these poor people from their dispersion among the mountains whither they had fled, and restored them to their country, their dwellings, and the exercise of their religion, and begged pardon for the ill usage they had received, charging it on the cruelty of the French who forced him to it. These being the remainder of those persecuted Christians which the Bishop of St. Asaph had so long affirmed to be the two witnesses spoken of in the Revelation, who should be killed and brought to life again, it was looked on as an extraordinary thing that this prophesying Bishop should persuade two fugitive ministers of the Vaudois to return to their country, and furnish them with £20 toward their journey, at that very time when nothing but universal destruction was to be expected, assuring them and showing them from the Apocalypse, that their countrymen should be returned safely to their country before they arrived. This happening contrary to all expectation and appearance, did exceedingly credit the Bishop's confidence how that prophecy of the witnesses should come to pass, just at the time, and the very month, he had spoken of some years before.
18th June, 1690. Day of Fasting. I visited the Bishop of St. Asaph; he spoke about the Vaudois in Savoy, who had been thought to be on the brink of destruction and total eradication by the French, completely resigned to slaughter, with no hope left for them. But now, it seemed that God had intervened as the Duke of Savoy, who had previously partnered with the French in their persecution, was pressured by them to hand over Saluzzo and Turin as guarantee towns, suspecting that he might eventually ally with the German Princes. He secretly coordinated actions with them and later declared his support. He then invited these poor souls, scattered in the mountains where they had fled, back to their homeland, restoring their homes and the practice of their faith, and apologized for the mistreatment they endured, blaming it on the cruelty of the French who had forced his hand. These were the remnants of the persecuted Christians that the Bishop of St. Asaph had long claimed to be the two witnesses mentioned in Revelation, who would be killed and brought back to life. It was considered extraordinary that this prophetic Bishop could persuade two fugitive ministers of the Vaudois to return to their homeland and even provide them with £20 for their journey, at a time when universal destruction seemed inevitable, assuring them and demonstrating from the Apocalypse that their fellow countrymen would safely return before they arrived. This event, which went against all expectations, greatly validated the Bishop's confidence in how the prophecy of the witnesses would come to fruition, exactly at the time and within the very month he had mentioned several years earlier.
I afterward went with him to Mr. Boyle and Lady Ranelagh his sister, to whom he explained the necessity of it so fully, and so learnedly made out, with what events were immediately to follow, viz, the French King's ruin, the calling of the Jews to be near at hand, but that the Kingdom of Antichrist would not yet be utterly destroyed till thirty years, when Christ should begin the Millenium, not as personally and visibly reigning on earth, but that the true religion and universal peace should obtain through all the world. He showed how Mr. Brightman, Mr. Mede, and other interpreters of these events failed, by mistaking and reckoning the year as the Latins and others did, to consist of the present cal[Pg 305]culation, so many days to the year, whereas the Apocalypse reckons after the Persian account, as Daniel did, whose visions St. John all along explains as meaning only the Christian Church.
I later went with him to see Mr. Boyle and his sister, Lady Ranelagh, where he explained the necessity for it in great detail, skillfully outlining what was about to happen next, specifically, the downfall of the French King, the imminent call for the Jews, and noting that the Kingdom of Antichrist wouldn’t be completely destroyed for another thirty years, when Christ would initiate the Millennium—not by personally and visibly ruling on earth, but by the true religion and universal peace spreading throughout the world. He illustrated how Mr. Brightman, Mr. Mede, and other interpreters of these events were mistaken by calculating the year according to the Latin method and others, which used the current calendar, with so many days per year, while the Apocalypse is based on the Persian timeline, as Daniel did, whose visions St. John consistently explains as referring solely to the Christian Church.
24th June, 1690. Dined with Mr. Pepys, who the next day was sent to the Gatehouse,74 and several great persons to the Tower, on suspicion of being affected to King James; among them was the Earl of Clarendon, the Queen's uncle. King William having vanquished King James in Ireland, there was much public rejoicing. It seems the Irish in King James's army would not stand, but the English-Irish and French made great resistance. Schomberg was slain, and Dr. Walker, who so bravely defended Londonderry. King William received a slight wound by the grazing of a cannon bullet on his shoulder, which he endured with very little interruption of his pursuit. Hamilton, who broke his word about Tyrconnel, was taken. It is reported that King James is gone back to France. Drogheda and Dublin surrendered, and if King William be returning, we may say of him as Cæsar said, "Veni, vidi, vici." But to alloy much of this, the French fleet rides in our channel, ours not daring to interpose, and the enemy threatening to land.
24th June, 1690. Had dinner with Mr. Pepys, who the next day was sent to the Gatehouse,74 along with several prominent figures to the Tower, suspected of being loyal to King James; among them was the Earl of Clarendon, the Queen's uncle. King William had defeated King James in Ireland, and there was a lot of public celebration. It seems the Irish in King James's army wouldn’t hold their ground, but the English-Irish and French put up strong resistance. Schomberg was killed, and Dr. Walker, who bravely defended Londonderry. King William received a minor wound from a cannonball grazing his shoulder, which he handled with little disruption to his campaign. Hamilton, who broke his promise regarding Tyrconnel, was captured. It's said that King James has returned to France. Drogheda and Dublin have surrendered, and if King William is coming back, we could say of him what Cæsar said, "Veni, vidi, vici." However, to dampen much of this, the French fleet is in our channel, and ours doesn’t dare to intervene, with the enemy threatening to land.
27th June, 1690. I went to visit some friends in the Tower, when asking for Lord Clarendon, they by mistake directed me to the Earl of Torrington, who about three days before had been sent for from the fleet, and put into the Tower for cowardice and not fighting the French fleet, which having beaten a squadron of the Hollanders, while Torrington did nothing, did now ride masters of the sea, threatening a descent.
27th June, 1690. I went to visit some friends in the Tower. When I asked for Lord Clarendon, they mistakenly directed me to the Earl of Torrington, who had been called back from the fleet about three days earlier and had been put in the Tower for cowardice for not fighting the French fleet. The French, having defeated a squadron of the Dutch while Torrington stood by doing nothing, were now dominant at sea, threatening an invasion.
20th July, 1690. This afternoon a camp of about 4,000 men was begun to be formed on Blackheath.
20th July, 1690. This afternoon, a camp of around 4,000 men started to be set up on Blackheath.
30th July, 1690. I dined with Mr. Pepys, now suffered to return to his house, on account of indisposition.
30th July, 1690. I had dinner with Mr. Pepys, who has now been allowed to return to his home due to feeling unwell.
1st August, 1690. The Duke of Grafton came to visit me, going to his ship at the mouth of the river, in his way to Ireland (where he was slain).
1st August, 1690. The Duke of Grafton came to see me on his way to his ship at the river's mouth, heading to Ireland (where he was killed).
3d August, 1690. The French landed some soldiers at[Pg 306] Teignmouth, in Devon, and burned some poor houses. The French fleet still hovering about the western coast, and we having 300 sail of rich merchant-ships in the bay of Plymouth, our fleet began to move toward them, under three admirals. The country in the west all on their guard. A very extraordinary fine season; but on the 12th was a very great storm of thunder and lightning, and on the 15th the season much changed to wet and cold. The militia and trained bands, horse and foot, which were up through England, were dismissed. The French King having news that King William was slain, and his army defeated in Ireland, caused such a triumph at Paris, and all over France, as was never heard of; when, in the midst of it, the unhappy King James being vanquished, by a speedy flight and escape, himself brought the news of his own defeat.
3rd August, 1690. The French landed some soldiers at[Pg 306] Teignmouth, in Devon, and burned a few houses. The French fleet was still hanging around the western coast, and since we had 300 merchant ships in the bay of Plymouth, our fleet started to move toward them, led by three admirals. The country in the west was on high alert. It was an unusually nice season; however, on the 12th, there was a severe storm with thunder and lightning, and by the 15th, the weather had turned wet and cold. The militia and trained bands, both mounted and on foot, that had been raised across England were sent home. The King of France, having heard that King William had been killed and his army defeated in Ireland, celebrated in a way that had never been seen before in Paris and all over France. In the middle of all this, the unfortunate King James was defeated and, in a hasty escape, brought the news of his own loss.
15th August, 1690. I was desired to be one of the bail of the Earl of Clarendon, for his release from the Tower, with divers noblemen. The Bishop of St. Asaph expounds his prophecies to me and Mr. Pepys, etc. The troops from Blackheath march to Portsmouth. That sweet and hopeful youth, Sir Charles Tuke, died of the wounds he received in the fight of the Boyne, to the great sorrow of all his friends, being (I think) the last male of that family, to which my wife is related. A more virtuous young gentleman I never knew; he was learned for his age, having had the advantage of the choicest breeding abroad, both as to arts and arms; he had traveled much, but was so unhappy as to fall in the side of his unfortunate King.
15th August, 1690. I was asked to be one of the people to bail the Earl of Clarendon out of the Tower, along with several noblemen. The Bishop of St. Asaph shared his interpretations of prophecies with me and Mr. Pepys, among others. The troops from Blackheath are marching to Portsmouth. That sweet and promising young man, Sir Charles Tuke, died from the wounds he sustained in the Battle of the Boyne, which caused great sorrow among all his friends, as he was (I believe) the last male descendant of that family, to which my wife is connected. I never knew a more virtuous young gentleman; he was exceptionally educated for his age, having received the best training abroad in both the arts and military; he had traveled extensively but was unfortunate enough to align with his doomed King.
The unseasonable and most tempestuous weather happening, the naval expedition is hindered, and the extremity of wet causes the siege of Limerick to be raised, King William returned to England. Lord Sidney left Governor of what is conquered in Ireland, which is near three parts [in four].
The unusual and extremely stormy weather is causing delays for the naval expedition, and the heavy rain has forced the siege of Limerick to be abandoned. King William went back to England. Lord Sidney was left as Governor of the areas that have been conquered in Ireland, which is about three-quarters of the land.
17th August, 1690. A public feast. An extraordinary sharp, cold, east wind.
17th August, 1690. A public feast. An unusually sharp, cold east wind.
12th October, 1690. The French General, with Tyrconnel and their forces, gone back to France, beaten out by King William. Cork delivered on discretion. The Duke of Grafton was there mortally wounded and dies. Very great storms of wind. The 8th of this month Lord[Pg 307] Spencer wrote me word from Althorpe, that there happened an earthquake the day before in the morning, which, though short, sensibly shook the house. The "Gazette" acquainted us that the like happened at the same time, half-past seven, at Barnstaple, Holyhead, and Dublin. We were not sensible of it here.
12th October, 1690. The French General, along with Tyrconnel and their troops, has returned to France after being defeated by King William. Cork was surrendered on the basis of discretion. The Duke of Grafton was present, gravely wounded and is dying. There have been very strong storms. On the 8th of this month, Lord[Pg 307] Spencer informed me from Althorpe that there was an earthquake the morning before, which, although brief, noticeably shook the house. The "Gazette" reported that a similar event occurred at the same time, at half-past seven, in Barnstaple, Holyhead, and Dublin. We did not feel it here.
26th October, 1690. Kinsale at last surrendered, meantime King James's party burn all the houses they have in their power, and among them that stately palace of Lord Ossory's, which lately cost, as reported, £40,000. By a disastrous accident, a third-rate ship, the Breda, blew up and destroyed all on board; in it were twenty-five prisoners of war. She was to have sailed for England the next day.
26th October, 1690. Kinsale finally surrendered, while King James's supporters burned down all the houses they could, including the impressive palace of Lord Ossory, which recently cost, as reported, £40,000. In a tragic accident, a third-rate ship, the Breda, exploded and killed everyone on board; there were twenty-five prisoners of war on it. It was supposed to set sail for England the next day.
3d November, 1690. Went to the Countess of Clancarty, to condole with her concerning her debauched and dissolute son, who had done so much mischief in Ireland, now taken and brought prisoner to the Tower.
3rd November, 1690. Went to the Countess of Clancarty, to express my condolences about her wild and reckless son, who had caused so much trouble in Ireland, now captured and brought as a prisoner to the Tower.
23d November, 1690. Carried Mr. Pepys's memorials to Lord Godolphin, now resuming the commission of the Treasury, to the wonder of all his friends.
23rd November, 1690. Delivered Mr. Pepys's notes to Lord Godolphin, who is now taking over the Treasury position again, surprising all his friends.
1st December, 1690. Having been chosen President of the Royal Society, I desired to decline it, and with great difficulty devolved the election on Sir Robert Southwell, Secretary of State to King William in Ireland.
1st December, 1690. After being chosen President of the Royal Society, I wanted to refuse the position and, with much difficulty, passed the election to Sir Robert Southwell, who was the Secretary of State to King William in Ireland.
20th December, 1690. Dr. Hough, President of Magdalen College, Oxford, who was displaced with several of the Fellows for not taking the oath imposed by King James, now made a Bishop. Most of this month cold and frost. One Johnson, a Knight, was executed at Tyburn for being an accomplice with Campbell, brother to Lord Argyle, in stealing a young heiress.
20th December, 1690. Dr. Hough, President of Magdalen College, Oxford, who was removed along with several of the Fellows for refusing to take the oath required by King James, was now made a Bishop. Most of this month was cold and frost. A man named Johnson, a Knight, was executed at Tyburn for being involved with Campbell, brother of Lord Argyle, in kidnapping a young heiress.
4th January, 1690-91. This week a PLOT was discovered for a general rising against the new Government, for which (Henry) Lord Clarendon and others were sent to the Tower. The next day, I went to see Lord Clarendon. The Bishop of Ely searched for. Trial of Lord Preston, as not being an English Peer, hastened at the Old Bailey.
4th January, 1690-91. This week, a PLOT was uncovered for a nationwide uprising against the new Government, which led to (Henry) Lord Clarendon and others being sent to the Tower. The following day, I went to visit Lord Clarendon. The Bishop of Ely was on the lookout. The trial of Lord Preston, since he wasn’t an English Peer, was expedited at the Old Bailey.
18th January, 1691. Lord Preston condemned about a design to bring in King James by the French. Ashton[Pg 308] executed. The Bishop of Ely, Mr. Graham, etc., absconded.
18th January, 1691. Lord Preston criticized a plan to bring in King James with the help of the French. Ashton[Pg 308] was executed. The Bishop of Ely, Mr. Graham, and others fled.
13th March, 1691. I went to visit Monsieur Justell and the Library at St. James's, in which that learned man had put the MSS. (which were in good number) into excellent order, they having lain neglected for many years. Divers medals had been stolen and embezzled.
13th March, 1691. I went to visit Monsieur Justell and the Library at St. James's, where that knowledgeable man had organized the manuscripts (there were quite a few) into excellent order, as they had been neglected for many years. Several medals had been stolen and misappropriated.
21st March, 1691. Dined at Sir William Fermor's, who showed me many good pictures. After dinner, a French servant played rarely on the lute. Sir William had now bought all the remaining statues collected with so much expense by the famous Thomas, Earl of Arundel, and sent them to his seat at Easton, near Towcester.75
21st March, 1691. Had dinner at Sir William Fermor's, who showed me a lot of great paintings. After dinner, a French servant played beautifully on the lute. Sir William had now purchased all the remaining statues collected at great expense by the famous Thomas, Earl of Arundel, and sent them to his home in Easton, near Towcester.75
25th March, 1691. Lord Sidney, principal Secretary of State, gave me a letter to Lord Lucas, Lieutenant of the Tower, to permit me to visit Lord Clarendon; which this day I did, and dined with him.
25th March, 1691. Lord Sidney, the main Secretary of State, gave me a letter to Lord Lucas, the Lieutenant of the Tower, allowing me to visit Lord Clarendon; which I did today and had dinner with him.
10th April, 1691. This night, a sudden and terrible fire burned down all the buildings over the stone gallery at Whitehall to the water side, beginning at the apartment of the late Duchess of Portsmouth (which had been pulled down and rebuilt no less than three times to please her), and consuming other lodgings of such lewd creatures, who debauched both King Charles II. and others, and were his destruction.
10th April, 1691. Last night, a sudden and devastating fire destroyed all the buildings along the stone gallery at Whitehall, right down to the waterfront. It started in the apartment of the late Duchess of Portsmouth (which had been torn down and rebuilt no less than three times to satisfy her), and it consumed other residences of those scandalous individuals who led King Charles II. and others to ruin.
The King returned out of Holland just as this accident happened—Proclamation against the Papists, etc.
The King came back from Holland right when this incident occurred—Proclamation against the Papists, etc.
16th April, 1691. I went to see Dr. Sloane's curiosities, being an universal collection of the natural productions of Jamaica, consisting of plants, fruits, corals, minerals, stones, earth, shells, animals, and insects, collected with great judgment; several folios of dried plants, and one which had about 80 several sorts of ferns, and another of grasses; the Jamaica pepper, in branch, leaves, flower, fruit, etc. This collection,76 with his Journal and other philosophical and natural discourses and observations, indeed very copious and extraordinary, sufficient to[Pg 309] furnish a history of that island, to which I encouraged him.
16th April, 1691. I went to check out Dr. Sloane's collection of curiosities, which is a comprehensive array of the natural wonders of Jamaica, including plants, fruits, corals, minerals, stones, soil, shells, animals, and insects, gathered with great care; several large books of dried plants, one featuring about 80 different types of ferns, and another of grasses; the Jamaica pepper, with its branches, leaves, flowers, fruit, etc. This collection,76 along with his Journal and other philosophical and natural writings and observations, is truly extensive and remarkable, enough to[Pg 309] provide a complete history of that island, which I encouraged him to pursue.
19th April, 1691. The Archbishop of Canterbury, and Bishops of Ely, Bath and Wells, Peterborough, Gloucester, and the rest who would not take the oaths to King William, were now displaced; and in their rooms, Dr. Tillotson, Dean of St. Paul's, was made Archbishop: Patrick removed from Chichester to Ely; Cumberland to Gloucester.
19th April, 1691. The Archbishop of Canterbury, along with the Bishops of Ely, Bath and Wells, Peterborough, Gloucester, and others who refused to swear loyalty to King William, were now removed from their positions; in their place, Dr. Tillotson, Dean of St. Paul's, was appointed Archbishop: Patrick was moved from Chichester to Ely; Cumberland was assigned to Gloucester.
22d April, 1691. I dined with Lord Clarendon in the Tower.
22nd April, 1691. I had lunch with Lord Clarendon in the Tower.
24th April, 1691. I visited the Earl and Countess of Sunderland, now come to kiss the King's hand after his return from Holland. This is a mystery. The King preparing to return to the army.
24th April, 1691. I visited the Earl and Countess of Sunderland, who have come to greet the King after his return from Holland. This is a mystery. The King is getting ready to go back to the army.
7th May, 1691. I went to visit the Archbishop of Canterbury [Sancroft] yet at Lambeth. I found him alone, and discoursing of the times, especially of the newly designed Bishops; he told me that by no canon or divine law they could justify the removing of the present incumbents; that Dr. Beveridge, designed Bishop of Bath and Wells, came to ask his advice; that the Archbishop told him, though he should give it, he believed he would not take it; the Doctor said he would; why then, says the Archbishop, when they come to ask, say "Nolo," and say it from the heart; there is nothing easier than to resolve yourself what is to be done in the case: the Doctor seemed to deliberate. What he will do I know not, but Bishop Ken, who is to be put out, is exceedingly beloved in his diocese; and, if he and the rest should insist on it, and plead their interest as freeholders, it is believed there would be difficulty in their case, and it may endanger a schism and much disturbance, so as wise men think it had been better to have let them alone, than to have proceeded with this rigor to turn them out for refusing to swear against their consciences. I asked at parting, when his Grace removed; he said that he had not yet received any summons, but I found the house altogether disfurnished and his books packed up.
7th May, 1691. I went to visit the Archbishop of Canterbury [Sancroft] at Lambeth. I found him alone, talking about the current times, particularly regarding the newly appointed Bishops. He mentioned that there was no canon or divine law that justified removing the current incumbents. Dr. Beveridge, who was set to be Bishop of Bath and Wells, came to seek his advice. The Archbishop told him that even if he offered advice, he didn’t think Dr. Beveridge would take it. The Doctor insisted he would. The Archbishop then said, “When they come to ask, say ‘Nolo,’ and mean it sincerely; it’s easy to decide what to do in this matter.” The Doctor seemed to think it over. What he will decide, I don’t know, but Bishop Ken, who is being removed, is very well-liked in his diocese. If he and the others push back and claim their rights as freeholders, it’s believed that there might be complications, and it could lead to a schism and a lot of unrest. Wise people think it would have been better to leave them be rather than forcibly remove them for refusing to go against their beliefs. When I asked about when his Grace would leave, he said he hadn’t received any notice yet, but the house was completely empty, and his books were packed up.
1st June, 1691. I went with my son, and brother-in-law, Glanville, and his son, to Wotton, to solemnize the funeral of my nephew, which was performed the next day very decently and orderly by the herald in the[Pg 310] afternoon, a very great appearance of the country being there. I was the chief mourner; the pall was held by Sir Francis Vincent, Sir Richard Onslow, Mr. Thomas Howard (son to Sir Robert, and Captain of the King's Guard), Mr. Hyldiard, Mr. James, Mr. Herbert, nephew to Lord Herbert of Cherbury, and cousin-german to my deceased nephew. He was laid in the vault at Wotton Church, in the burying place of the family. A great concourse of coaches and people accompanied the solemnity.
1st June, 1691. I went with my son and my brother-in-law, Glanville, along with his son, to Wotton for the funeral of my nephew, which took place the following day in a very respectful and orderly manner by the herald in the[Pg 310] afternoon, with a significant turnout from the local community. I was the chief mourner; the pall was carried by Sir Francis Vincent, Sir Richard Onslow, Mr. Thomas Howard (son of Sir Robert and Captain of the King's Guard), Mr. Hyldiard, Mr. James, Mr. Herbert, nephew to Lord Herbert of Cherbury, and cousin to my late nephew. He was laid to rest in the vault at Wotton Church, in the family burial area. A large number of coaches and people attended the ceremony.
10th June, 1691. I went to visit Lord Clarendon, still prisoner in the Tower, though Lord Preston being pardoned was released.
10th June, 1691. I went to visit Lord Clarendon, still in prison in the Tower, even though Lord Preston was pardoned and freed.
17th June, 1691. A fast.
June 17, 1691. A fast.
11th July, 1691. I dined with Mr. Pepys, where was Dr. Cumberland, the new Bishop of Norwich,77 Dr. Lloyd having been put out for not acknowledging the Government. Cumberland is a very learned, excellent man. Possession was now given to Dr. Tillotson, at Lambeth, by the Sheriff; Archbishop Sancroft was gone, but had left his nephew to keep possession; and he refusing to deliver it up on the Queen's message, was dispossessed by the Sheriff, and imprisoned. This stout demeanor of the few Bishops who refused to take the oaths to King William, animated a great party to forsake the churches, so as to threaten a schism; though those who looked further into the ancient practice, found that when (as formerly) there were Bishops displaced on secular accounts, the people never refused to acknowledge the new Bishops, provided they were not heretics. The truth is, the whole clergy had till now stretched the duty of passive obedience, so that the proceedings against these Bishops gave no little occasion of exceptions; but this not amounting to heresy, there was a necessity of receiving the new Bishops, to prevent a failure of that order in the Church. I went to visit Lord Clarendon in the Tower, but he was gone into the country for air by the Queen's permission, under the care of his warden.
11th July, 1691. I had dinner with Mr. Pepys, where Dr. Cumberland, the new Bishop of Norwich, was present, since Dr. Lloyd had been removed for not recognizing the Government. Cumberland is a very knowledgeable and excellent man. Dr. Tillotson was now officially given possession at Lambeth by the Sheriff; Archbishop Sancroft had left but had appointed his nephew to maintain control. When his nephew refused to hand it over at the Queen's request, he was removed by the Sheriff and imprisoned. This brave stance by the few Bishops who refused to take the oaths to King William encouraged many to abandon the churches, which nearly led to a schism. However, those who looked more deeply into the traditional practices noted that when, in the past, Bishops were removed for political reasons, the people always accepted the new Bishops, as long as they weren't heretics. The reality is that the entire clergy had up to that point stretched the concept of passive obedience, and the actions against these Bishops created significant exceptions; yet this didn’t equate to heresy, so there was a need to accept the new Bishops to avoid disrupting the order within the Church. I went to visit Lord Clarendon in the Tower, but he had gone to the countryside for fresh air with the Queen's permission, under the care of his warden.
18th July, 1691. To London to hear Mr. Stringfellow preach his first sermon in the newly erected Church of[Pg 311] Trinity, in Conduit Street; to which I did recommend him to Dr. Tenison for the constant preacher and lecturer. This Church, formerly built of timber on Hounslow-Heath by King James for the mass priests, being begged by Dr. Tenison, rector of St. Martin's, was set up by that public-minded, charitable, and pious man near my son's dwelling in Dover Street, chiefly at the charge of the Doctor. I know him to be an excellent preacher and a fit person. This Church, though erected in St. Martin's, which is the Doctor's parish, he was not only content, but was the sole industrious mover, that it should be made a separate parish, in regard of the neighborhood having become so populous. Wherefore to countenance and introduce the new minister, and take possession of a gallery designed for my son's family, I went to London, where,
18th July, 1691. I went to London to hear Mr. Stringfellow preach his first sermon at the newly built Church of[Pg 311] Trinity on Conduit Street. I had recommended him to Dr. Tenison to be the regular preacher and lecturer. This church, which was originally constructed out of timber on Hounslow Heath by King James for the mass priests, was requested by Dr. Tenison, the rector of St. Martin's, and built by that public-spirited, charitable, and devout man close to my son's home on Dover Street, mainly funded by the Doctor. I know he is an excellent preacher and a suitable person for the role. Although this church was established in St. Martin's, which is the Doctor's parish, he was not only agreeable to it but was also the main advocate for it becoming a separate parish due to the area’s growing population. Therefore, to support and welcome the new minister, and to claim a gallery intended for my son’s family, I traveled to London, where,
19th July, 1691. In the morning Dr. Tenison preached the first sermon, taking his text from Psalm xxvi. 8. "Lord, I have loved the habitation of thy house, and the place where thine honor dwelleth." In concluding, he gave that this should be made a parish church so soon as the Parliament sat, and was to be dedicated to the Holy Trinity, in honor of the three undivided persons in the Deity; and he minded them to attend to that faith of the church, now especially that Arianism, Socinianism, and atheism began to spread among us. In the afternoon, Mr. Stringfellow preached on Luke vii. 5. "The centurion who had built a synagogue." He proceeded to the due praise of persons of such public spirit, and thence to such a character of pious benefactors in the person of the generous centurion, as was comprehensive of all the virtues of an accomplished Christian, in a style so full, eloquent, and moving, that I never heard a sermon more apposite to the occasion. He modestly insinuated the obligation they had to that person who should be the author and promoter of such public works for the benefit of mankind, especially to the advantage of religion, such as building and endowing churches, hospitals, libraries, schools, procuring the best editions of useful books, by which he handsomely intimated who it was that had been so exemplary for his benefaction to that place. Indeed, that excellent person, Dr. Tenison, had also erected and furnished a public library [in St. Martin's]; and set[Pg 312] up two or three free schools at his own charges. Besides this, he was of an exemplary, holy life, took great pains in constantly preaching, and incessantly employing himself to promote the service of God both in public and private. I never knew a man of a more universal and generous spirit, with so much modesty, prudence, and piety.
19th July, 1691. In the morning, Dr. Tenison delivered the first sermon, using his text from Psalm xxvi. 8. "Lord, I have loved the habitation of your house, and the place where your honor dwells." In his conclusion, he stated that this would become a parish church as soon as Parliament reconvened and would be dedicated to the Holy Trinity, honoring the three undivided persons in the Deity. He reminded them to hold on to the church's faith, especially now that Arianism, Socinianism, and atheism were starting to spread among us. In the afternoon, Mr. Stringfellow preached on Luke vii. 5. "The centurion who had built a synagogue." He emphasized the deserving praise of individuals with such public spirit and highlighted the character of pious benefactors in the generous centurion, encompassing all the virtues of a well-rounded Christian, in a manner that was complete, eloquent, and moving, making it the most fitting sermon for the occasion that I had ever heard. He subtly suggested the obligation they held towards anyone who would be the author and promoter of such public works for the benefit of humanity, especially for religion, such as building and endowing churches, hospitals, libraries, and schools, and acquiring the best editions of useful books, elegantly hinting at who had been exemplary in his generosity towards that place. Indeed, that outstanding individual, Dr. Tenison, had also established and equipped a public library [in St. Martin's]; and set up two or three free schools at his own expense. Additionally, he led an exemplary and holy life, worked tirelessly in preaching regularly, and continually dedicated himself to promoting the service of God both publicly and privately. I never knew a man with a more universal and generous spirit, combined with such modesty, prudence, and piety.
The great victory of King William's army in Ireland was looked on as decisive of that war. The French General, St. Ruth, who had been so cruel to the poor Protestants in France, was slain, with divers of the best commanders; nor was it cheap to us, having 1,000 killed, but of the enemy 4,000 or 5,000.
The significant victory of King William's army in Ireland was seen as a turning point in that war. The French General, St. Ruth, who had been so harsh to the poor Protestants in France, was killed, along with several of the top commanders; it wasn't without cost to us, as we lost 1,000 men, while the enemy suffered about 4,000 or 5,000 casualties.
26th July, 1691. An extraordinary hot season, yet refreshed by some thundershowers.
26th July, 1691. An extremely hot season, but relieved by a few thunderstorms.
28th July, 1691. I went to Wotton.
28th July, 1691. I traveled to Wotton.
2d August, 1691. No sermon in the church in the afternoon, and the curacy ill-served.
2nd August, 1691. No sermon in the church this afternoon, and the curacy poorly managed.
16th August, 1691. A sermon by the curate; an honest discourse, but read without any spirit, or seeming concern; a great fault in the education of young preachers. Great thunder and lightning on Thursday, but the rain and wind very violent. Our fleet come in to lay up the great ships; nothing done at sea, pretending that we cannot meet the French.
16th August, 1691. A sermon by the curate; an honest talk, but delivered without any energy or apparent emotion; a big flaw in the training of young preachers. There was heavy thunder and lightning on Thursday, but the rain and wind were really intense. Our fleet arrived to dock the large ships; nothing happened at sea, claiming that we can't engage the French.
13th September, 1691. A great storm at sea; we lost the "Coronation" and "Harwich," above 600 men perishing.
13th September, 1691. A major storm at sea; we lost the "Coronation" and "Harwich," with over 600 men dying.
14th October, 1691. A most pleasing autumn. Our navy come in without having performed anything, yet there has been great loss of ships by negligence, and unskillful men governing the fleet and Navy board.
14th October, 1691. A very pleasant autumn. Our navy arrived without accomplishing anything, yet there has been a significant loss of ships due to carelessness and inexperienced people managing the fleet and the Navy board.
7th November, 1691. I visited the Earl of Dover, who having made his peace with the King, was now come home. The relation he gave of the strength of the French King, and the difficulty of our forcing him to fight, and any way making impression into France, was very wide from what we fancied.
7th November, 1691. I visited the Earl of Dover, who, having reconciled with the King, was back home. His account of the French King’s power and the challenge of getting him to engage in battle, as well as our ability to penetrate France, was very different from what we had imagined.
8th to 30th November, 1691. An extraordinary dry and warm season, without frost, and like a new spring; such as had not been known for many years. Part of the King's house at Kensington was burned.
8th to 30th November, 1691. An unusually dry and warm season, with no frost, resembling a new spring; something that hadn’t been seen in many years. Part of the King’s house at Kensington was destroyed by fire.
6th December, 1691. Discourse of another PLOT, in which several great persons were named, but believed to be a[Pg 313] sham.—A proposal in the House of Commons that every officer in the whole nation who received a salary above £500 or otherwise by virtue of his office, should contribute it wholly to the support of the war with France, and this upon their oath.
6th December, 1691. Discussion of another PLOT, in which several prominent figures were mentioned, but thought to be a [Pg 313] sham.—A proposal in the House of Commons that every official in the entire country who received a salary over £500, or otherwise by virtue of their position, should contribute it fully to support the war with France, and this based on their oath.
25th December, 1691. My daughter-in-law was brought to bed of a daughter.
25th December, 1691. My daughter-in-law gave birth to a daughter.
26th December, 1691. An exceedingly dry and calm winter; no rain for many past months.
26th December, 1691. An extremely dry and calm winter; no rain for many months.
28th December, 1691. Dined at Lambeth with the new Archbishop. Saw the effect of my greenhouse furnace, set up by the Archbishop's son-in-law.
28th December, 1691. I had dinner at Lambeth with the new Archbishop. I noticed the impact of my greenhouse furnace, which was installed by the Archbishop's son-in-law.
30th December, 1691. I again saw Mr. Charlton's collection of spiders, birds, scorpions, and other serpents, etc.
30th December, 1691. I saw Mr. Charlton's collection of spiders, birds, scorpions, and other snakes again.
1st January, 1691-92. This last week died that pious, admirable Christian, excellent philosopher, and my worthy friend, Mr. Boyle, aged about 65,—a great loss to all that knew him, and to the public.
1st January, 1691-92. This past week, that devout, remarkable Christian, outstanding philosopher, and my good friend, Mr. Boyle, passed away at around 65— a significant loss to everyone who knew him and to the public.
6th January, 1692. At the funeral of Mr. Boyle, at St. Martin's, Dr. Burnet, Bishop of Salisbury, preached on Eccles. ii. 26. He concluded with an eulogy due to the deceased, who made God and religion the scope of all his excellent talents in the knowledge of nature, and who had arrived to so high a degree in it, accompanied with such zeal and extraordinary piety, which he showed in the whole course of his life, particularly in his exemplary charity on all occasions,—that he gave £1,000 yearly to the distressed refugees of France and Ireland; was at the charge of translating the Scriptures into the Irish and Indian tongues, and was now promoting a Turkish translation, as he had formerly done of Grotius "on the Truth of the Christian Religion" into Arabic, which he caused to be dispersed in the eastern countries; that he had settled a fund for preachers who should preach expressly against Atheists, Libertines, Socinians, and Jews; that he had in his will given £8,000 to charitable uses; but that his private charities were extraordinary. He dilated on his learning in Hebrew and Greek, his reading of the fathers, and solid knowledge in theology, once deliberating about taking Holy Orders, and that at the time of restoration of King Charles II., when he might have made a great figure in the nation as to[Pg 314] secular honor and titles, his fear of not being able to discharge so weighty a duty as the first, made him decline that, and his humility the other. He spoke of his civility to strangers, the great good which he did by his experience in medicine and chemistry, and to what noble ends he applied himself to his darling studies; the works, both pious and useful, which he published; the exact life he led, and the happy end he made. Something was touched of his sister, the Lady Ranelagh, who died but a few days before him. And truly all this was but his due, without any grain of flattery.
6th January, 1692. At Mr. Boyle's funeral at St. Martin's, Dr. Burnet, Bishop of Salisbury, preached on Ecclesiastes 2:26. He concluded with a heartfelt tribute to the deceased, who dedicated his remarkable talents to God and religion in understanding nature. He achieved an impressive level in this, paired with incredible zeal and piety, evident throughout his life, especially in his noteworthy charity on all occasions—donating £1,000 each year to support distressed refugees from France and Ireland; funding the translation of the Scriptures into Irish and Indian languages, and currently promoting a Turkish translation, just as he had previously facilitated Grotius's "On the Truth of the Christian Religion" into Arabic, which he distributed in Eastern countries; he established a fund for preachers specifically preaching against Atheists, Libertines, Socinians, and Jews; he left £8,000 in his will for charitable causes, but his personal acts of charity were extraordinary. He elaborated on Boyle's mastery of Hebrew and Greek, his reading of the Church Fathers, and his deep understanding of theology, mentioning that he once considered taking Holy Orders, during the restoration of King Charles II, when he could have gained great secular honor and titles, but his concern about fulfilling such a heavy responsibility led him to decline that path, while his humility kept him from seeking the latter. He spoke of Boyle's kindness to strangers, the significant good he did through his expertise in medicine and chemistry, and the noble purposes he pursued in his favorite studies; the pious and practical works he published; the disciplined life he led, and the peaceful end he reached. Briefly, his sister, Lady Ranelagh, who passed away just days before him, was mentioned. And truly, all of this was simply a genuine acknowledgment, without any hint of flattery.
This week a most execrable murder was committed on Dr. Clench, father of that extraordinary learned child whom I have before noticed. Under pretense of carrying him in a coach to see a patient, they strangled him in it; and, sending away the coachman under some pretense, they left his dead body in the coach, and escaped in the dusk of the evening.
This week, a terrible murder was committed against Dr. Clench, the father of that exceptionally gifted child I’ve mentioned before. Under the guise of taking him in a cab to see a patient, they strangled him inside it; then, sending the driver away for some reason, they left his dead body in the cab and escaped into the evening darkness.
12th January, 1692. My granddaughter was christened by Dr. Tenison, now Bishop of Lincoln, in Trinity Church, being the first that was christened there. She was named Jane.
12th January, 1692. My granddaughter was baptized by Dr. Tenison, now Bishop of Lincoln, in Trinity Church, being the first to be baptized there. She was named Jane.
24th January, 1692. A frosty and dry season continued; many persons die of apoplexy, more than usual. Lord Marlborough, Lieutenant-General of the King's army in England, gentleman of the bedchamber, etc., dismissed from all his charges, military and other, for his excessive taking of bribes, covetousness, and extortion on all occasions from his inferior officers. Note, this was the Lord who was entirely advanced by King James, and was the first who betrayed and forsook his master. He was son of Sir Winston Churchill of the Greencloth.
24th January, 1692. The cold and dry season continued; many people were dying from strokes, more than usual. Lord Marlborough, the Lieutenant-General of the King's army in England and a gentleman of the bedchamber, was removed from all his positions, both military and otherwise, because of his excessive bribery, greed, and constant extortion from his subordinate officers. It's important to note that this was the Lord who was completely promoted by King James and was the first to betray and abandon his master. He was the son of Sir Winston Churchill of the Greencloth.
7th February, 1692. An extraordinary snow fell in most parts.
7th February, 1692. An unusual snow fell in many areas.
13th February, 1692. Mr. Boyle having made me one of the trustees for his charitable bequests, I went to a meeting of the Bishop of Lincoln, Sir Rob.... wood, and serjeant, Rotheram, to settle that clause in the will which related to charitable uses, and especially the appointing and electing a minister to preach one sermon the first Sunday in the month, during the four summer months, expressly against Atheists, Deists, Libertines, Jews, etc., without descending to any other controversy whatever,[Pg 315] for which £50 per annum is to be paid quarterly to the preacher; and, at the end of three years, to proceed to a new election of some other able divine, or to continue the same, as the trustees should judge convenient. We made choice of one Mr. Bentley, chaplain to the Bishop of Worcester (Dr. Stillingfleet). The first sermon was appointed for the first Sunday in March, at St. Martin's; the second Sunday in April, at Bow Church, and so alternately.
13th February, 1692. Mr. Boyle appointed me as one of the trustees for his charitable donations, and I attended a meeting with the Bishop of Lincoln, Sir Rob.... wood, and Sergeant Rotheram to finalize the clause in the will regarding charitable purposes, particularly the appointment of a minister to deliver a sermon on the first Sunday of each month during the four summer months, specifically targeting Atheists, Deists, Libertines, Jews, etc., without engaging in any other disputes whatsoever,[Pg 315] for which £50 per year will be paid quarterly to the preacher; and, after three years, to hold a new election for another qualified minister or to keep the same one, as the trustees see fit. We chose Mr. Bentley, chaplain to the Bishop of Worcester (Dr. Stillingfleet). The first sermon is scheduled for the first Sunday in March at St. Martin's; the second Sunday in April at Bow Church, and it will continue alternately.
28th February, 1692. Lord Marlborough having used words against the King, and been discharged from all his great places, his wife was forbidden the Court, and the Princess of Denmark was desired by the Queen to dismiss her from her service; but she refusing to do so, goes away from Court to Sion house. Divers new Lords made: Sir Henry Capel, Sir William Fermor, etc. Change of Commissioners in the Treasury. The Parliament adjourned, not well satisfied with affairs. The business of the East India Company, which they would have reformed, let fall. The Duke of Norfolk does not succeed in his endeavor to be divorced.78
28th February, 1692. Lord Marlborough was dismissed from all his high-ranking positions for speaking against the King, and his wife was banned from the Court. The Queen asked the Princess of Denmark to let her go from her service, but she refused, choosing to leave the Court for Sion House instead. Several new Lords were appointed: Sir Henry Capel, Sir William Fermor, and others. There was a change in the Treasury Commissioners. The Parliament adjourned, feeling dissatisfied with the situation. The plan to reform the East India Company was dropped. The Duke of Norfolk was unsuccessful in his attempt to get a divorce.78
20th March, 1692. My son was made one of the Commissioners of the Revenue and Treasury of Ireland, to which employment he had a mind, far from my wishes. I visited the Earl of Peterborough, who showed me the picture of the Prince of Wales, newly brought out of France, seeming in my opinion very much to resemble the Queen his mother, and of a most vivacious countenance.
20th March, 1692. My son was appointed as one of the Commissioners of the Revenue and Treasury of Ireland, a position he desired, much to my dismay. I visited the Earl of Peterborough, who showed me the portrait of the Prince of Wales, recently brought over from France. In my opinion, he closely resembles his mother, the Queen, and has a very lively expression.
April, 1692. No spring yet appearing. The Queen Dowager went out of England toward Portugal, as pretended, against the advice of all her friends.
April 1692. Spring hasn’t arrived yet. The Queen Dowager left England for Portugal, supposedly, despite the warnings from all her friends.
4th April, 1692. Mr. Bentley preached Mr. Boyle's lecture at St. Mary-le-Bow. So excellent a discourse against the Epicurean system is not to be recapitulated in a few words. He came to me to ask whether I thought it should be printed, or that there was anything in it which I desired to be altered. I took this as a civility, and earnestly desired it should be printed, as one of the most learned and convincing discourses I had ever heard.
4th April, 1692. Mr. Bentley gave a sermon on Mr. Boyle's lecture at St. Mary-le-Bow. His argument against the Epicurean system was so exceptional that it can't be summarized in just a few words. He approached me to ask if I thought it should be published or if there was anything I wanted changed. I took this as a polite gesture and strongly expressed that it should be published, as it was one of the most knowledgeable and persuasive talks I had ever heard.
6th April, 1692. A fast. King James sends a letter written and directed by his own hand to several of the[Pg 316] Privy Council, and one to his daughter, the Queen Regent, informing them of the Queen being ready to be brought to bed, and summoning them to be at the birth by the middle of May, promising as from the French King, permission to come and return in safety.
6th April, 1692. A fast. King James sends a letter written and directed by his own hand to several of the[Pg 316] Privy Council, and one to his daughter, the Queen Regent, letting them know that the Queen is about to give birth and calling them to be present at the delivery by mid-May, promising, on behalf of the French King, safe passage for their arrival and departure.
24th April, 1692. Much apprehension of a French invasion, and of an universal rising. Our fleet begins to join with the Dutch. Unkindness between the Queen and her sister. Very cold and unseasonable weather, scarce a leaf on the trees.
24th April, 1692. There is a lot of worry about a French invasion and a widespread uprising. Our fleet is starting to team up with the Dutch. There is tension between the Queen and her sister. The weather is very cold and unseasonable, with hardly a leaf on the trees.
5th May, 1692. Reports of an invasion were very hot, and alarmed the city, Court, and people; nothing but securing suspected persons, sending forces to the seaside, and hastening out the fleet. Continued discourse of the French invasion, and of ours in France. The eastern wind so constantly blowing, gave our fleet time to unite, which had been so tardy in preparation, that, had not God thus wonderfully favored, the enemy would in all probability have fallen upon us. Many daily secured, and proclamations out for more conspirators.
5th May, 1692. Rumors of an invasion were spreading quickly, causing panic among the city, the Court, and the people; all efforts were focused on detaining suspected individuals, sending troops to the coast, and getting the fleet ready. There was ongoing talk about the French invasion and our plans in France. The consistently blowing eastern wind gave our fleet a chance to come together, which had been delayed in its preparations; if it weren't for this amazing favor from God, the enemy would likely have attacked us. Many were arrested every day, and announcements were made for more conspirators.
8th May, 1692. My kinsman, Sir Edward Evelyn, of Long Ditton, died suddenly.
8th May, 1692. My relative, Sir Edward Evelyn, of Long Ditton, passed away unexpectedly.
12th May, 1692. A fast.
May 12, 1692. A fast.
13th May, 1692. I dined at my cousin Cheny's, son to my Lord Cheny, who married my cousin Pierpoint.
13th May, 1692. I had dinner at my cousin Cheny's house, the son of my Lord Cheny, who married my cousin Pierpoint.
15th May, 1692. My niece, M. Evelyn, was now married to Sir Cyril Wyche, Secretary of State for Ireland. After all our apprehensions of being invaded, and doubts of our success by sea, it pleased God to give us a great naval victory, to the utter ruin of the French fleet, their admiral and all their best men-of-war, transport-ships, etc.
15th May, 1692. My niece, M. Evelyn, was now married to Sir Cyril Wyche, Secretary of State for Ireland. After all our fears of being invaded and doubts about our success at sea, it pleased God to grant us a significant naval victory, completely destroying the French fleet, their admiral, and all their best warships, transport ships, etc.
29th May, 1692. Though this day was set apart expressly for celebrating the memorable birth, return, and restoration of the late King Charles II., there was no notice taken of it, nor any part of the office annexed to the Common Prayer Book made use of, which I think was ill done, in regard his restoration not only redeemed us from anarchy and confusion, but restored the Church of England as it were miraculously.
29th May, 1692. Even though this day was specifically designated to celebrate the notable birth, return, and restoration of the late King Charles II., it passed without any acknowledgment, and no part of the service from the Book of Common Prayer was used. I believe this was poorly handled, considering that his restoration not only saved us from anarchy and chaos but also miraculously restored the Church of England.
9th June, 1692. I went to Windsor to carry my grandson to Eton School, where I met my Lady Stonehouse[Pg 317] and other of my daughter-in-law's relations, who came on purpose to see her before her journey into Ireland. We went to see the castle, which we found furnished and very neatly kept, as formerly, only that the arms in the guard chamber and keep were removed and carried away. An exceeding great storm of wind and rain, in some places stripping the trees of their fruit and leaves as if it had been winter; and an extraordinary wet season, with great floods.
9th June, 1692. I went to Windsor to take my grandson to Eton School, where I met Lady Stonehouse[Pg 317] and some of my daughter-in-law's relatives, who came specifically to see her before her trip to Ireland. We visited the castle, which was still furnished and kept very tidy, just like before, except that the coats of arms in the guard chamber and keep had been removed and taken away. There was an incredibly strong storm of wind and rain, which in some places stripped the trees of their fruit and leaves as if it were winter; and it has been an unusually wet season, with major flooding.
23d July, 1692. I went with my wife, son, and daughter, to Eton, to see my grandson, and thence to my Lord Godolphin's, at Cranburn, where we lay, and were most honorably entertained. The next day to St. George's Chapel, and returned to London late in the evening.
23rd July, 1692. I went with my wife, son, and daughter to Eton to see my grandson, and then to my Lord Godolphin's at Cranburn, where we stayed and were treated with the utmost hospitality. The next day, we went to St. George's Chapel and returned to London late in the evening.
25th July, 1692. To Mr. Hewer's at Clapham, where he has an excellent, useful, and capacious house on the Common, built by Sir Den. Gauden, and by him sold to Mr. Hewer, who got a very considerable estate in the Navy, in which, from being Mr. Pepys's clerk, he came to be one of the principal officers, but was put out of all employment on the Revolution, as were all the best officers, on suspicion of being no friends to the change; such were put in their places, as were most shamefully ignorant and unfit. Mr. Hewer lives very handsomely and friendly to everybody. Our fleet was now sailing on their long pretense of a descent on the French coast; but, after having sailed one hundred leagues, returned, the admiral and officers disagreeing as to the place where they were to land, and the time of year being so far spent,—to the great dishonor of those at the helm, who concerted their matters so indiscreetly, or, as some thought, designedly.
25th July, 1692. To Mr. Hewer's in Clapham, where he has a great, useful, and spacious house on the Common, built by Sir Den. Gauden, and then sold to Mr. Hewer, who amassed a significant fortune in the Navy. He started as Mr. Pepys's clerk and became one of the top officers, but lost his job after the Revolution, like many skilled officers, suspected of being unsupportive of the change. They were replaced by individuals who were both shamefully ignorant and unqualified. Mr. Hewer lives quite well and is friendly to everyone. Our fleet was currently sailing under the pretense of an invasion of the French coast, but after traveling one hundred leagues, they returned because the admiral and officers couldn’t agree on where to land, and the time of year was too advanced,—bringing great dishonor to those in charge, who planned their actions so poorly, or as some believed, deliberately.
This whole summer was exceedingly wet and rainy, the like had not been known since the year 1648; while in Ireland they had not known so great a drought.
This entire summer was extremely wet and rainy, unlike anything seen since 1648; meanwhile, Ireland experienced its worst drought.
26th July, 1692. I went to visit the Bishop of Lincoln, when, among other things, he told me that one Dr. Chaplin, of University College in Oxford, was the person who wrote the "Whole Duty of Man"; that he used to read it to his pupil, and communicated it to Dr. Sterne, afterward Archbishop of York, but would never suffer any of his pupils to have a copy of it.[Pg 318]
26th July, 1692. I went to visit the Bishop of Lincoln, and during our conversation, he mentioned that a certain Dr. Chaplin from University College in Oxford was the author of the "Whole Duty of Man." He used to read it to his students and shared it with Dr. Sterne, who later became Archbishop of York, but he never allowed any of his students to have their own copy of it.[Pg 318]
9th August, 1692. A fast. Came the sad news of the hurricane and earthquake, which has destroyed almost the whole Island of Jamaica, many thousands having perished.
9th August, 1692. A day of fasting. We received the tragic news of the hurricane and earthquake that have devastated almost the entire Island of Jamaica, resulting in the deaths of many thousands.
11th August, 1692. My son, his wife, and little daughter, went for Ireland, there to reside as one of the Commissioners of the Revenue.
11th August, 1692. My son, his wife, and their little daughter went to Ireland to live as one of the Revenue Commissioners.
14th August, 1692. Still an exceedingly wet season.
14th August, 1692. It’s still an incredibly rainy season.
15th September, 1692. There happened an earthquake, which, though not so great as to do any harm in England, was universal in all these parts of Europe. It shook the house at Wotton, but was not perceived by any save a servant or two, who were making my bed, and another in a garret. I and the rest being at dinner below in the parlor, were not sensible of it. The dreadful one in Jamaica this summer was profanely and ludicrously represented in a puppet play, or some such lewd pastime, in the fair of Southwark, which caused the Queen to put down that idle and vicious mock show.
15th September, 1692. An earthquake occurred that, while not strong enough to cause any damage in England, was felt across much of Europe. It rattled the house at Wotton, although only a couple of servants who were making my bed and another in an upper room noticed it. The rest of us were having dinner downstairs in the parlor and didn’t feel a thing. The terrible earthquake in Jamaica this summer was inappropriately and mockingly depicted in a puppet show or some other crude entertainment at the Southwark fair, which prompted the Queen to shut down that silly and immoral spectacle.
1st October, 1692. This season was so exceedingly cold, by reason of a long and tempestuous northeast wind, that this usually pleasant month was very uncomfortable. No fruit ripened kindly. Harbord dies at Belgrade; Lord Paget sent Ambassador in his room.
1st October, 1692. This season was extremely cold due to a long and stormy northeast wind, making this usually pleasant month quite uncomfortable. No fruit ripened properly. Harbord died at Belgrade; Lord Paget sent an ambassador in his place.
6th November, 1692. There was a vestry called about repairing or new building of the church [at Deptford], which I thought unseasonable in regard of heavy taxes, and other improper circumstances, which I there declared.
6th November, 1692. A meeting was called to discuss repairing or rebuilding the church [at Deptford], which I thought was ill-timed due to the heavy taxes and other inappropriate circumstances, which I expressed there.
10th November, 1692. A solemn Thanksgiving for our victory at sea, safe return of the King, etc.
10th November, 1692. A serious Thanksgiving for our victory at sea, the safe return of the King, and so on.
20th November, 1692. Dr. Lancaster, the new Vicar of St. Martin's, preached.
20th November, 1692. Dr. Lancaster, the new Vicar of St. Martin's, preached.
A signal robbery in Hertfordshire of the tax money bringing out of the north toward London. They were set upon by several desperate persons, who dismounted and stopped all travelers on the road, and guarding them in a field, when the exploit was done, and the treasure taken, they killed all the horses of those whom they stayed, to hinder pursuit, being sixteen horses. They then dismissed those that they had dismounted.
A major robbery in Hertfordshire involved tax money being transported south to London. A group of desperate individuals attacked and stopped all travelers on the road, leading them into a field. After carrying out the robbery and taking the loot, they killed all the horses of those they had stopped to prevent anyone from chasing after them, totaling sixteen horses. They then let go of the travelers they had dismounted.
14th December, 1692. With much reluctance we gratified Sir J. Rotherham, one of Mr. Boyle's trustees, by[Pg 319] admitting the Bishop of Bath and Wells to be lecturer for the next year, instead of Mr. Bentley, who had so worthily acquitted himself. We intended to take him in again the next year.
14th December, 1692. With a lot of hesitation, we agreed to satisfy Sir J. Rotherham, one of Mr. Boyle's trustees, by[Pg 319] allowing the Bishop of Bath and Wells to be the lecturer for the upcoming year, instead of Mr. Bentley, who had done an excellent job. We planned to bring him back the following year.
January, 1692-93. Contest in Parliament about a self-denying Act, that no Parliament man should have any office; it wanted only two or three voices to have been carried. The Duke of Norfolk's bill for a divorce thrown out, he having managed it very indiscreetly. The quarrel between Admiral Russell and Lord Nottingham yet undetermined.
January, 1692-93. There was a debate in Parliament over a self-denying Act, which aimed to prevent any member of Parliament from holding an office; it needed just a couple more votes to pass. The Duke of Norfolk's divorce bill was rejected because he handled it very poorly. The conflict between Admiral Russell and Lord Nottingham is still unresolved.
4th February, 1693. After five days' trial and extraordinary contest, the Lord Mohun was acquitted by the Lords of the murder of Montford, the player, notwithstanding the judges, from the pregnant witnesses of the fact, had declared him guilty; but whether in commiseration of his youth, being not eighteen years old, though exceedingly dissolute, or upon whatever other reason, the King himself present some part of the trial, and satisfied, as they report, that he was culpable. 69 acquitted him, only 14 condemned him.
4th February, 1693. After five days of trial and intense debate, Lord Mohun was found not guilty by the Lords for the murder of Montford, the actor, even though the judges had declared him guilty based on strong witness testimony. It’s uncertain whether this was due to sympathy for his youth, as he was not yet eighteen years old, despite his reckless behavior, or for some other reason. The King himself attended part of the trial and reportedly believed he was culpable, but ultimately 69 acquitted him while only 14 condemned him.
Unheard of stories of the universal increase of witches in New England; men, women, and children, devoting themselves to the devil, so as to threaten the subversion of the government.79 At the same time there was a conspiracy among the negroes in Barbadoes to murder all their masters, discovered by overhearing a discourse of two of the slaves, and so preventing the execution of the design. Hitherto an exceedingly mild winter. France in the utmost misery and poverty for want of corn and subsistence, while the ambitious King is intent to pursue his conquests on the rest of his neighbors both by sea and land. Our Admiral, Russell, laid aside for not pursuing the advantage he had obtained over the French in the past summer; three others chosen in his place. Dr. Burnet, Bishop of Salisbury's book burned by the hangman for an expression of the King's title by conquest, on a[Pg 320] complaint of Joseph How, a member of Parliament, little better than a madman.
Unheard of stories about the growing number of witches in New England; men, women, and children dedicating themselves to the devil, threatening to overthrow the government.79 At the same time, there was a plot among the enslaved people in Barbados to kill all their masters, discovered by overhearing a conversation between two of the slaves, which stopped the plan from happening. So far, it has been an unusually mild winter. France is suffering extreme misery and poverty due to a lack of grain and food, while the ambitious King is focused on continuing his conquests against his neighbors by both sea and land. Our Admiral, Russell, was dismissed for not taking advantage of the victory he achieved over the French last summer; three others were chosen to take his place. Dr. Burnet, Bishop of Salisbury's book was burned by the executioner for mentioning the King's title by conquest, following a complaint by Joseph How, a member of Parliament, who is hardly more sane than a madman.[Pg 320]
19th February, 1693. The Bishop of Lincoln preached in the afternoon at the Tabernacle near Golden Square, set up by him. Proposals of a marriage between Mr. Draper and my daughter Susanna. Hitherto an exceedingly warm winter, such as has seldom been known, and portending an unprosperous spring as to the fruits of the earth; our climate requires more cold and winterly weather. The dreadful and astonishing earthquake swallowing up Catania, and other famous and ancient cities, with more than 100,000 persons in Sicily, on 11th January last, came now to be reported among us.
19th February, 1693. The Bishop of Lincoln preached in the afternoon at the Tabernacle near Golden Square, which he established. There are talks about a marriage between Mr. Draper and my daughter Susanna. This has been an unusually warm winter, unlike anything we've seen before, and it looks like spring won't be good for the crops; our climate needs more cold and wintry weather. The terrible and shocking earthquake that destroyed Catania, along with other well-known and ancient cities, took the lives of more than 100,000 people in Sicily on 11th January and is now being reported among us.
26th February, 1693. An extraordinary deep snow, after almost no winter, and a sudden gentle thaw. A deplorable earthquake at Malta, since that of Sicily, nearly as great.
26th February, 1693. An unusually heavy snowfall, following nearly no winter, and a sudden gentle thaw. A devastating earthquake in Malta, almost as powerful as that of Sicily.
19th March, 1693. A new Secretary of State, Sir John Trenchard; the Attorney-General, Somers, made Lord-Keeper, a young lawyer of extraordinary merit. King William goes toward Flanders; but returns, the wind being contrary.
19th March, 1693. A new Secretary of State, Sir John Trenchard; the Attorney-General, Somers, appointed as Lord Keeper, a talented young lawyer. King William heads towards Flanders but returns because the wind is against him.
31st March, 1693. I met the King going to Gravesend to embark in his yacht for Holland.
31st March, 1693. I saw the King on his way to Gravesend to board his yacht for Holland.
23d April, 1693. An extraordinary wet spring.
23rd April, 1693. An unusually rainy spring.
27th April, 1693. My daughter Susanna was married to William Draper, Esq., in the chapel of Ely House, by Dr. Tenison, Bishop of Lincoln (since Archbishop). I gave her in portion £4,000, her jointure is £500 per annum. I pray Almighty God to give his blessing to this marriage! She is a good child, religious, discreet, ingenious, and qualified with all the ornaments of her sex. She has a peculiar talent in design, as painting in oil and miniature, and an extraordinary genius for whatever hands can do with a needle. She has the French tongue, has read most of the Greek and Roman authors and poets, using her talents with great modesty; exquisitely shaped, and of an agreeable countenance. This character is due to her, though coming from her father. Much of this week spent in ceremonies, receiving visits and entertaining relations, and a great part of the next in returning visits.
27th April, 1693. My daughter Susanna married William Draper, Esq., in the chapel of Ely House, officiated by Dr. Tenison, Bishop of Lincoln (now Archbishop). I provided her with a dowry of £4,000, and her annual jointure is £500. I pray Almighty God to bless this marriage! She is a wonderful young woman—religious, sensible, talented, and possesses all the qualities expected of her gender. She has a unique talent for design, especially in oil painting and miniatures, and an exceptional skill for anything that can be done with a needle. She speaks French, has read most of the works of Greek and Roman authors and poets, and uses her gifts with great humility; she is beautifully shaped and has a charming face. This description is deserved by her, even if it reflects on her father. Much of this week was spent on ceremonies, receiving visitors, and hosting family, with a significant portion of the next week dedicated to returning visits.
11th May, 1693. We accompanied my daughter to her[Pg 321] husband's house, where with many of his and our relations we were magnificently treated. There we left her in an apartment very richly adorned and furnished, and I hope in as happy a condition as could be wished, and with the great satisfaction of all our friends; for which God be praised!
11th May, 1693. We went with my daughter to her[Pg 321] husband's house, where we were treated wonderfully by many of his and our relatives. We left her in a beautifully decorated and furnished room, and I hope she was as happy as anyone could wish, bringing great satisfaction to all our friends; for which we thank God!
14th May, 1693. Nothing yet of action from abroad. Muttering of a design to bring forces under color of an expected descent, to be a standing army for other purposes. Talk of a declaration of the French King, offering mighty advantages to the confederates, exclusive of King William; and another of King James, with an universal pardon, and referring the composing of all differences to a Parliament. These were yet but discourses; but something is certainly under it. A declaration or manifesto from King James, so written, that many thought it reasonable, and much more to the purpose than any of his former.
14th May, 1693. Still no news of action from overseas. There's talk of a plan to gather troops under the pretense of an anticipated invasion, with the intention of creating a standing army for other purposes. Rumors are circulating about a declaration from the French King, offering significant benefits to the allies, excluding King William; and another one from King James, which includes a general pardon and suggests resolving all disputes in Parliament. These are just discussions for now, but there is definitely something happening. A declaration or manifesto from King James has been drafted in a way that many considered reasonable and much more relevant than any of his previous ones.
11th June, 1693. I dined at Sir William Godolphin's; and, after evening prayer, visited the Duchess of Grafton.
11th June, 1693. I had dinner at Sir William Godolphin's; and, after evening prayer, I visited the Duchess of Grafton.
21st June, 1693. I saw a great auction of pictures in the Banqueting house, Whitehall. They had been my Lord Melford's, now Ambassador from King James at Rome, and engaged to his creditors here. Lord Mulgrave and Sir Edward Seymour came to my house, and desired me to go with them to the sale. Divers more of the great lords, etc., were there, and bought pictures dear enough. There were some very excellent of Vandyke, Rubens, and Bassan. Lord Godolphin bought the picture of the Boys, by Murillo the Spaniard, for 80 guineas, dear enough; my nephew Glanville, the old Earl of Arundel's head by Rubens, for £20. Growing late, I did not stay till all were sold.
21st June, 1693. I witnessed a large auction of paintings at the Banqueting House in Whitehall. The collection used to belong to Lord Melford, the Ambassador from King James in Rome, and was put up for sale to settle his debts here. Lord Mulgrave and Sir Edward Seymour came to my place and asked me to join them for the auction. Several other prominent lords were present and bid quite a bit for the paintings. There were some exceptional works by Vandyke, Rubens, and Bassan. Lord Godolphin purchased the painting of the Boys by the Spanish artist Murillo for 80 guineas, which was quite a hefty price; my nephew Glanville got the old Earl of Arundel's portrait by Rubens for £20. As it was getting late, I didn’t stay until everything was sold.
24th June, 1693. A very wet hay harvest, and little summer as yet.
24th June, 1693. A very rainy hay harvest, and hardly any summer so far.
9th July, 1693. Mr. Tippin, successor of Dr. Parr at Camberwell, preached an excellent sermon.
9th July, 1693. Mr. Tippin, who took over from Dr. Parr at Camberwell, delivered an excellent sermon.
13th July, 1693. I saw the Queen's rare cabinets and collection of china; which was wonderfully rich and plenti[Pg 322]ful, but especially a large cabinet, looking-glass frame and stands, all of amber, much of it white, with historical bas-reliefs and statues, with medals carved in them, esteemed worth £4,000, sent by the Duke of Brandenburgh, whose country, Prussia, abounds with amber, cast up by the sea; divers other China and Indian cabinets, screens, and hangings. In her library were many books in English, French, and Dutch, of all sorts; a cupboard of gold plate; a cabinet of silver filagree, which I think was our Queen Mary's, and which, in my opinion, should have been generously sent to her.
13th July, 1693. I saw the Queen's impressive cabinets and china collection, which was incredibly rich and abundant, especially a large cabinet with a looking-glass frame and stands made of amber, much of it white, featuring historical bas-reliefs and statues, along with carved medals, valued at £4,000, sent by the Duke of Brandenburg, whose region, Prussia, has plenty of amber washed up by the sea; along with various other Chinese and Indian cabinets, screens, and hangings. In her library, there were many books in English, French, and Dutch on all sorts of topics; a cupboard filled with gold plates; and a cabinet made of silver filigree, which I believe belonged to our Queen Mary, and in my opinion, should have been graciously returned to her.
18th July, 1693. I dined with Lord Mulgrave, with the Earl of Devonshire, Mr. Hampden (a scholar and fine gentleman), Dr. Davenant, Sir Henry Vane, and others, and saw and admired the Venus of Correggio, which Lord Mulgrave had newly bought of Mr. Daun for £250; one of the best paintings I ever saw.
18th July, 1693. I had dinner with Lord Mulgrave, the Earl of Devonshire, Mr. Hampden (a scholar and a great guy), Dr. Davenant, Sir Henry Vane, and others, and I saw and admired the Venus by Correggio, which Lord Mulgrave had just purchased from Mr. Daun for £250; one of the best paintings I’ve ever seen.
1st August, 1693. Lord Capel, Sir Cyril Wyche, and Mr. Duncomb, made Lord Justices in Ireland; Lord Sydney recalled, and made Master of the Ordnance.
1st August, 1693. Lord Capel, Sir Cyril Wyche, and Mr. Duncomb were appointed as Lord Justices in Ireland; Lord Sydney was recalled and appointed as Master of the Ordnance.
6th August, 1693. Very lovely harvest weather, and a wholesome season, but no garden fruit.
6th August, 1693. Beautiful weather for harvesting, and a healthy season, but no garden fruits.
31st October, 1693. A very wet and uncomfortable season.
31st October, 1693. A very rainy and uncomfortable time.
12th November, 1693. Lord Nottingham resigned as Secretary of State; the Commissioners of the Admiralty ousted, and Russell restored to his office. The season continued very wet, as it had nearly all the summer, if one might call it summer, in which there was no fruit, but corn was very plentiful.
12th November, 1693. Lord Nottingham stepped down as Secretary of State; the Commissioners of the Admiralty were removed, and Russell returned to his position. The weather remained very rainy, just like it had throughout most of the summer, if you could even call it summer, since there was no fruit, but grain was in abundant supply.
14th November, 1693. In the lottery set up after the Venetian manner by Mr. Neale, Sir R. Haddock, one of the Commissioners of the Navy, had the greatest lot, £3,000; my coachman £40.
14th November, 1693. In the lottery organized in the Venetian style by Mr. Neale, Sir R. Haddock, one of the Navy Commissioners, won the largest prize, £3,000; my coachman won £40.
17th November, 1693. Was the funeral of Captain Young, who died of the stone and great age. I think he was the first who in the first war with Cromwell against Spain, took the Governor of Havanna, and another rich prize, and struck the first stroke against the Dutch fleet in the first war with Holland in the time of the Rebellion; a sober man and an excellent seaman.
17th November, 1693. This was the funeral of Captain Young, who passed away due to kidney stones and old age. I believe he was the first to capture the Governor of Havana during the first war with Cromwell against Spain, along with another valuable prize. He was also the one who dealt the first blow to the Dutch fleet in the initial war with Holland during the time of the Rebellion; a serious man and an outstanding sailor.
30th November, 1693. Much importuned to take the office of President of the Royal Society, but I again[Pg 323] declined it. Sir Robert Southwell was continued. We all dined at Pontac's as usual.
30th November, 1693. I was pressured once again to accept the role of President of the Royal Society, but I declined it again. Sir Robert Southwell was reappointed. We all had dinner at Pontac's as usual.
3d December, 1693. Mr. Bentley preached at the Tabernacle, near Golden Square. I gave my voice for him to proceed on his former subject the following year in Mr. Boyle's lecture, in which he had been interrupted by the importunity of Sir J. Rotheram that the Bishop of Chichester80 might be chosen the year before, to the great dissatisfaction of the Bishop of Lincoln and myself. We chose Mr. Bentley again. The Duchess of Grafton's appeal to the House of Lords for the Prothonotary's place given to the late Duke and to her son by King Charles II., now challenged by the Lord Chief Justice. The judges were severely reproved on something they said.
3rd December, 1693. Mr. Bentley preached at the Tabernacle, near Golden Square. I voted for him to continue on his previous topic next year in Mr. Boyle's lecture, where he had been interrupted by Sir J. Rotheram's insistence that the Bishop of Chichester80 should be selected the year before, much to the dissatisfaction of the Bishop of Lincoln and me. We chose Mr. Bentley again. The Duchess of Grafton appealed to the House of Lords for the Prothonotary's position that had been given to the late Duke and her son by King Charles II., which is now being disputed by the Lord Chief Justice. The judges were harshly criticized for something they said.
10th December, 1693. A very great storm of thunder and lightning.
10th December, 1693. A huge storm with thunder and lightning.
1st January, 1693-94. Prince Lewis of Baden came to London, and was much feasted. Danish ships arrested carrying corn and naval stores to France.
1st January, 1693-94. Prince Lewis of Baden arrived in London and was celebrated with many feasts. Danish ships were stopped while transporting grain and naval supplies to France.
11th January, 1694. Supped at Mr. Edward Sheldon's, where was Mr. Dryden, the poet, who now intended to write no more plays, being intent on his translation of Virgil. He read to us his prologue and epilogue to his valedictory play now shortly to be acted.
11th January, 1694. Had dinner at Mr. Edward Sheldon's, where Mr. Dryden, the poet, was present. He now planned to stop writing plays and was focused on translating Virgil. He read to us his prologue and epilogue for his farewell play that would soon be performed.
21st January, 1694. Lord Macclesfield, Lord Warrington, and Lord Westmorland, all died within about one week. Several persons shot, hanged, and made away with themselves.
21st January, 1694. Lord Macclesfield, Lord Warrington, and Lord Westmorland all died within about a week of each other. Several people were shot, hanged, or took their own lives.
11th February, 1694. Now was the great trial of the appeal of Lord Bath and Lord Montagu before the Lords, for the estate of the late Duke of Albemarle.
11th February, 1694. Now was the significant trial of the appeal of Lord Bath and Lord Montagu before the Lords, for the estate of the late Duke of Albemarle.
10th March, 1694. Mr. Stringfellow preached at Trinity parish, being restored to that place, after the contest between the Queen and the Bishop of London who had displaced him.
10th March, 1694. Mr. Stringfellow preached at Trinity parish, having been reinstated there after the dispute between the Queen and the Bishop of London who had removed him.
22d March, 1694. Came the dismal news of the disaster befallen our Turkey fleet by tempest, to the almost utter ruin of that trade, the convoy of three or four men-of-war, and divers merchant ships, with all their men and lading, having perished.
22nd March, 1694. We received the terrible news about the disaster that struck our Turkey fleet during a storm, nearly destroying that trade. The convoy of three or four warships, along with several merchant ships and all their crew and cargo, has been lost.
25th March, 1694. Mr. Goode, minister of St. Martin's, preached; he was likewise put in by the Queen,[Pg 324] on the issue of her process with the Bishop of London.
25th March, 1694. Mr. Goode, the minister of St. Martin's, preached; he was also appointed by the Queen,[Pg 324] regarding her situation with the Bishop of London.
30th March, 1694. I went to the Duke of Norfolk, to desire him to make cousin Evelyn of Nutfield one of the Deputy-Lieutenants of Surrey, and entreat him to dismiss my brother, now unable to serve by reason of age and infirmity. The Duke granted the one, but would not suffer my brother to resign his commission, desiring he should keep the honor of it during his life, though he could not act. He professed great kindness to our family.
30th March, 1694. I visited the Duke of Norfolk to ask him to appoint cousin Evelyn of Nutfield as one of the Deputy-Lieutenants of Surrey and to kindly request that my brother be allowed to step down, as he was no longer able to serve due to age and health issues. The Duke agreed to the first request but would not allow my brother to resign his commission, wishing for him to retain the honor for life, even if he couldn’t perform the duties. He expressed considerable warmth towards our family.
1st April, 1694. Dr. Sharp, Archbishop of York, preached in the afternoon at the Tabernacle, by Soho.
1st April, 1694. Dr. Sharp, the Archbishop of York, preached in the afternoon at the Tabernacle in Soho.
13th April, 1694. Mr. Bentley, our Boyle Lecturer, Chaplain to the Bishop of Worcester, came to see me.
13th April, 1694. Mr. Bentley, our Boyle Lecturer and Chaplain to the Bishop of Worcester, came to visit me.
15th April, 1694. One Mr. Stanhope preached a most excellent sermon.
15th April, 1694. A man named Mr. Stanhope delivered a truly outstanding sermon.
22d April, 1694. A fiery exhalation rising out of the sea, spread itself in Montgomeryshire a furlong broad, and many miles in length, burning all straw, hay, thatch, and grass, but doing no harm to trees, timber, or any solid things, only firing barns, or thatched houses. It left such a taint on the grass as to kill all the cattle that eat of it. I saw the attestations in the hands of the sufferers. It lasted many months. "The Berkeley Castle" sunk by the French coming from the East Indies, worth £200,000. The French took our castle of Gamboo in Guinea, so that the Africa Actions fell to £30, and the India to £80. Some regiments of Highland Dragoons were on their march through England; they were of large stature, well appointed and disciplined. One of them having reproached a Dutchman for cowardice in our late fight, was attacked by two Dutchmen, when with his sword he struck off the head of one, and cleft the skull of the other down to his chin.
22nd April, 1694. A fiery plume rising from the sea spread across Montgomeryshire, a furlong wide and many miles long, burning all straw, hay, thatch, and grass, but causing no damage to trees, timber, or any solid objects, only igniting barns or thatched houses. It left such a residue on the grass that it killed all the cattle that grazed on it. I saw the testimonies in the hands of the affected. It lasted for many months. "The Berkeley Castle" sank due to the French coming from the East Indies, valued at £200,000. The French captured our castle of Gamboo in Guinea, causing Africa stock prices to drop to £30 and India to decline to £80. Some regiments of Highland Dragoons were marching through England; they were tall, well-equipped, and well-disciplined. One of them, having called out a Dutchman for cowardice in our recent battle, was confronted by two Dutchmen, when he struck off one’s head with his sword and split the other’s skull down to his chin.
A very young gentleman named Wilson, the younger son of one who had not above £200 a year estate, lived in the garb and equipage of the richest nobleman, for house, furniture, coaches, saddle horses, and kept a table, and all things accordingly, redeemed his father's estate, and gave portions to his sisters, being challenged by one Laws, a Scotchman, was killed in a duel, not fairly. The quarrel arose from his taking away his own sister from lodging in a house where this Laws had a mistress, which[Pg 325] the mistress of the house thinking a disparagement to it, and losing by it, instigated Laws to this duel. He was taken and condemned for murder. The mystery is how this so young a gentleman, very sober and of good fame, could live in such an expensive manner; it could not be discovered by all possible industry, or entreaty of his friends to make him reveal it. It did not appear that he was kept by women, play, coining, padding, or dealing in chemistry; but he would sometimes say that if he should live ever so long, he had wherewith to maintain himself in the same manner. He was very civil and well-natured, but of no great force of understanding. This was a subject of much discourse.
A very young man named Wilson, the younger son of someone who had an estate worth no more than £200 a year, lived like the richest nobleman. He had a house, nice furniture, coaches, saddle horses, and kept a dining table, all of which redeemed his father's estate and provided portions for his sisters. He was challenged to a duel by a man named Laws, a Scotsman, and was killed unfairly. The conflict started because he took his own sister away from a place where Laws had a mistress, which upset the mistress of that house, leading her to provoke Laws into the duel. Wilson was captured and sentenced for murder. The mystery is how such a young gentleman, who was very sober and had a good reputation, could afford to live so extravagantly. No matter how hard anyone tried or how much his friends pleaded with him, he would not reveal how he managed it. It didn’t seem that he was supported by women, gambling, counterfeiting, or dealing in alchemy; but he would sometimes claim that no matter how long he lived, he had enough to maintain his lifestyle. He was very polite and kind but not particularly sharp intellectually. This became a topic of much discussion.
24th April, 1694. I went to visit Mr. Waller, an extraordinary young gentleman of great accomplishments, skilled in mathematics, anatomy, music, painting both in oil and miniature to great perfection, an excellent botanist, a rare engraver on brass, writer in Latin, and a poet; and with all this exceedingly modest. His house is an academy of itself. I carried him to see Brompton Park [by Knightsbridge], where he was in admiration at the store of rare plants, and the method he found in that noble nursery, and how well it was cultivated. A public Bank of £140,000, set up by Act of Parliament among other Acts, and Lotteries for money to carry on the war. The whole month of April without rain. A great rising of people in Buckinghamshire, on the declaration of a famous preacher, till now reputed a sober and religious man, that our Lord Christ appearing to him on the 16th of this month, told him he was now come down, and would appear publicly at Pentecost, and gather all the saints, Jews and Gentiles, and lead them to Jerusalem, and begin the Millennium, and destroying and judging the wicked, deliver the government of the world to the saints. Great multitudes followed this preacher, divers of the most zealous brought their goods and considerable sums of money, and began to live in imitation of the primitive saints, minding no private concerns, continually dancing and singing Hallelujah night and day. This brings to mind what I lately happened to find in Alstedius, that the thousand years should begin this very year 1694; it is in his "Encyclopædia Biblica." My copy of the book printed near sixty years ago.[Pg 326]
24th April, 1694. I went to visit Mr. Waller, an amazing young man with impressive skills. He excels in mathematics, anatomy, music, and painting both in oil and miniature, and he is also a fantastic botanist, a rare engraver on brass, a Latin writer, and a poet; yet he is incredibly modest. His house feels like an academy on its own. I took him to see Brompton Park [by Knightsbridge], where he was amazed by the collection of rare plants and the care taken in that magnificent nursery. There’s a public Bank of £140,000, established by an Act of Parliament among other acts, and lotteries to fund the war. The entire month of April has been dry. There’s been a significant uprising in Buckinghamshire, sparked by the declaration of a well-known preacher, previously considered sober and pious, who claimed that our Lord Christ appeared to him on the 16th of this month and told him that He is now here and will publicly appear at Pentecost, gathering all saints, Jews, and Gentiles, leading them to Jerusalem, starting the Millennium, judging the wicked, and giving the governance of the world to the saints. Huge crowds have followed this preacher, with many zealous followers bringing their belongings and large sums of money, starting to live like the early saints, ignoring personal affairs, and constantly dancing and singing Hallelujah day and night. This reminds me of something I recently found in Alstedius, that the thousand years are supposed to begin this very year 1694; it’s mentioned in his "Encyclopædia Biblica." My copy of the book was printed nearly sixty years ago.[Pg 326]
4th May, 1694. I went this day with my wife and four servants from Sayes Court, removing much furniture of all sorts, books, pictures, hangings, bedding, etc., to furnish the apartment my brother assigned me, and now, after more than forty years, to spend the rest of my days with him at Wotton, where I was born; leaving my house at Deptford full furnished, and three servants, to my son-in-law Draper, to pass the summer in, and such longer time as he should think fit to make use of it.
4th May, 1694. Today, I went with my wife and four servants from Sayes Court, moving various types of furniture, books, pictures, hangings, bedding, and more to set up the apartment my brother assigned to me. Now, after more than forty years, I’ll spend the rest of my days with him at Wotton, the place where I was born. I left my fully furnished house in Deptford and three servants to my son-in-law Draper, so he can use it for the summer and as long as he thinks is necessary.
6th May, 1694. This being the first Sunday in the month, the blessed sacrament of the Lord's Supper ought to have been celebrated at Wotton church, but in this parish it is exceedingly neglected, so that, unless at the four great feasts, there is no communion hereabouts; which is a great fault both in ministers and people. I have spoken to my brother, who is the patron, to discourse the minister about it. Scarcely one shower has fallen since the beginning of April.
6th May, 1694. Since it's the first Sunday of the month, the holy sacrament of the Lord's Supper should have been held at Wotton church, but it's greatly overlooked in this parish. Unless it’s one of the four major feasts, there’s hardly ever any communion around here, which is a serious issue for both the ministers and the congregation. I’ve talked to my brother, who is the patron, to discuss this with the minister. There hasn’t been much rain since the start of April.
30th May, 1694. This week we had news of my Lord Tiviot having cut his own throat, through what discontent not yet said. He had been, not many years past, my colleague in the commission of the Privy Seal, in old acquaintance, very soberly and religiously inclined. Lord, what are we without thy continual grace!
30th May, 1694. This week we learned that Lord Tiviot has taken his own life by cutting his throat, though the reasons for his despair are still unknown. Just a few years ago, he was my colleague on the Privy Seal commission and was known for being quite serious and pious. Lord, what are we without your constant grace!
Lord Falkland, grandson to the learned Lord Falkland, Secretary of State to King Charles I., and slain in his service, died now of the smallpox. He was a pretty, brisk, understanding, industrious young gentleman; had formerly been faulty, but now much reclaimed; had also the good luck to marry a very great fortune, besides being entitled to a vast sum, his share of the Spanish wreck, taken up at the expense of divers adventurers. From a Scotch Viscount he was made an English Baron, designed Ambassador for Holland; had been Treasurer of the Navy, and advancing extremely in the new Court. All now gone in a moment, and I think the title is extinct. I know not whether the estate devolves to my cousin Carew. It was at my Lord Falkland's, whose lady importuned us to let our daughter be with her some time, so that that dear child took the same infection, which cost her valuable life.
Lord Falkland, grandson of the learned Lord Falkland, Secretary of State to King Charles I, who was killed in his service, recently died from smallpox. He was a charming, lively, intelligent, and hardworking young man; he had made mistakes in the past but had really turned his life around. He was also fortunate enough to marry someone with a huge fortune, in addition to being entitled to a significant amount from the Spanish wreck that was recovered at the expense of various investors. He was elevated from a Scottish Viscount to an English Baron and was designated as the Ambassador to Holland; he had been the Treasurer of the Navy and was rapidly rising in the new Court. All of that is now gone in an instant, and I believe the title is now extinct. I'm unsure if the estate goes to my cousin Carew. It was at Lord Falkland's home, where his wife urged us to let our daughter stay with her for a while, which led to our dear child contracting the same infection, which cost her her precious life.
3d June, 1694. Mr. Edwards, minister of Denton, in[Pg 327] Sussex, a living in my brother's gift, came to see him. He had suffered much by a fire. Seasonable showers.
3rd June, 1694. Mr. Edwards, the minister of Denton, in [Pg 327] Sussex, which is a position my brother controls, came to visit him. He had suffered a lot from a fire. Fortunately, there were timely showers.
14th June, 1694. The public fast. Mr. Wotton, that extraordinary learned young man, preached excellently.
14th June, 1694. The public fast. Mr. Wotton, that exceptionally knowledgeable young man, preached brilliantly.
1st July, 1694. Mr. Duncomb, minister of Albury, preached at Wotton, a very religious and exact discourse.
1st July, 1694. Mr. Duncomb, the minister of Albury, preached at Wotton, delivering a very thoughtful and precise sermon.
The first great bank for a fund of money being now established by Act of Parliament, was filled and completed to the sum of £120,000, and put under the government of the most able and wealthy citizens of London. All who adventured any sum had four per cent., so long as it lay in the bank, and had power either to take it out at pleasure, or transfer it. Glorious steady weather; corn and all fruits in extraordinary plenty generally.
The first major bank for a pool of money has now been established by Act of Parliament, fully funded to the amount of £120,000, and managed by the most capable and affluent citizens of London. Anyone who invested any amount earned four percent as long as it remained in the bank, with the option to withdraw it at any time or transfer it. The weather has been wonderfully stable, with corn and all types of fruits abundantly available.
13th July, 1694. Lord Berkeley burnt Dieppe and Havre de Grace with bombs, in revenge for the defeat at Brest. This manner of destructive war was begun by the French, is exceedingly ruinous, especially falling on the poorer people, and does not seem to tend to make a more speedy end of the war; but rather to exasperate and incite to revenge. Many executed at London for clipping money, now done to that intolerable extent, that there was hardly any money that was worth above half the nominal value.
13th July, 1694. Lord Berkeley bombed Dieppe and Havre de Grace as revenge for the defeat at Brest. This method of destructive warfare was started by the French, is extremely devastating, particularly impacting the poorer people, and doesn’t seem to lead to a quicker end to the war; instead, it tends to provoke and incite revenge. Many were executed in London for clipping money, which has become such a widespread issue that hardly any money was valued at more than half its nominal worth.
4th August, 1694. I went to visit my cousin, George Evelyn of Nutfield, where I found a family of ten children, five sons and five daughters—all beautiful women grown, and extremely well-fashioned. All painted in one piece, very well, by Mr. Lutterell, in crayon on copper, and seeming to be as finely painted as the best miniature. They are the children of two extraordinary beautiful wives. The boys were at school.
4th August, 1694. I visited my cousin, George Evelyn of Nutfield, and found a family with ten children, five sons and five daughters—all beautiful young women, well-shaped and elegant. They were all painted together in one piece, very skillfully by Mr. Lutterell, in crayon on copper, looking as finely done as the best miniatures. They are the children of two extraordinarily beautiful wives. The boys were at school.
5th August, 1694. Stormy and unseasonable wet weather this week.
5th August, 1694. Stormy and unusually rainy weather this week.
5th October, 1694. I went to St. Paul's to see the choir, now finished as to the stone work, and the scaffold struck both without and within, in that part. Some exceptions might perhaps be taken as to the placing columns on pilasters at the east tribunal. As to the rest it is a piece of architecture without reproach. The pulling out the forms, like drawers, from under the stalls, is[Pg 328] ingenious. I went also to see the building beginning near St. Giles's, where seven streets make a star from a Doric pillar placed in the middle of a circular area; said to be built by Mr. Neale, introducer of the late lotteries, in imitation of those at Venice, now set up here, for himself twice, and now one for the State.
5th October, 1694. I went to St. Paul's to check out the choir, which is now done with the stonework, and the scaffolding is down both outside and inside that area. Some people might have issues with how the columns are placed on pilasters at the east tribunal. Other than that, it's an impressive piece of architecture. The way the forms can be pulled out like drawers from under the stalls is[Pg 328] clever. I also went to see the building starting near St. Giles's, where seven streets fan out from a Doric pillar in the center of a circular area; it's said to be built by Mr. Neale, who introduced the recent lotteries, modeled after those in Venice, established here for himself twice, and now another for the State.
28th October, 1694. Mr. Stringfellow preached at Trinity church.
28th October, 1694. Mr. Stringfellow preached at Trinity Church.
22d November, 1694. Visited the Bishop of Lincoln [Tenison] newly come on the death of the Archbishop of Canterbury, who a few days before had a paralytic stroke,—the same day and month that Archbishop Sancroft was put out. A very sickly time, especially the smallpox, of which divers considerable persons died. The State lottery81 drawing, Mr. Cock, a French refugee, and a President in the Parliament of Paris for the Reformed, drew a lot of £1,000 per annum.
22nd November, 1694. I visited the Bishop of Lincoln [Tenison], who had just arrived following the death of the Archbishop of Canterbury, who had suffered a stroke a few days earlier—on the same day and month that Archbishop Sancroft was removed. It was a particularly unhealthy time, especially with smallpox, which claimed the lives of several notable people. The State lottery81 was drawing, and Mr. Cock, a French refugee and a President in the Parliament of Paris for the Reformed, won a prize of £1,000 per year.
29th November, 1694. I visited the Marquis of Normanby, and had much discourse concerning King Charles II. being poisoned. Also concerning the quinquina which the physicians would not give to the King, at a time when, in a dangerous ague, it was the only thing that could cure him (out of envy because it had been brought into vogue by Mr. Tudor, an apothecary), till Dr. Short, to whom the King sent to know his opinion of it privately, he being reputed a Papist (but who was in truth a very honest, good Christian), sent word to the King that it was the only thing which could save his life, and then the King enjoined his physicians to give it to him, which they did and he recovered. Being asked by this Lord why they would not prescribe it, Dr. Lower said it would spoil their practice, or some such expression, and at last confessed it was a remedy fit only for kings. Exception was taken that the late Archbishop did not cause any of his Chaplains to use any office for the sick during his illness.
29th November, 1694. I visited the Marquis of Normanby and had a lengthy conversation about the poisoning of King Charles II. We also discussed the quinquina that the doctors refused to give the King during a serious fever, even though it was the only thing that could save him (out of envy because it had been popularized by Mr. Tudor, an apothecary). It wasn't until Dr. Short, whom the King privately consulted for his opinion and who was rumored to be a Papist (though in reality, he was a genuinely good Christian), sent word that it was the only thing that could preserve his life. The King then insisted that his doctors administer it, which they did, and he recovered. When this Lord asked why they wouldn’t prescribe it, Dr. Lower said it would ruin their practice or something similar and eventually admitted that it was a remedy only suitable for kings. There was also criticism that the late Archbishop did not have any of his Chaplains perform any sick rituals during his illness.
9th December, 1694. I had news that my dear and worthy friend, Dr. Tenison, Bishop of Lincoln, was made Archbishop of Canterbury, for which I thank God and rejoice, he being most worthy of it, for his learning, piety, and prudence.
9th December, 1694. I received news that my dear and valued friend, Dr. Tenison, Bishop of Lincoln, has been appointed Archbishop of Canterbury. I thank God for this and feel joyful, as he truly deserves it for his knowledge, devotion, and wisdom.
13th December, 1694. I went to London to congratu[Pg 329]late him. He being my proxy, gave my vote for Dr. Williams, to succeed Mr. Bentley in Mr. Boyle's lectures.
13th December, 1694. I went to London to congratulate[Pg 329] him. He, acting as my proxy, cast my vote for Dr. Williams to succeed Mr. Bentley in Mr. Boyle's lectures.
29th December, 1694. The smallpox increased exceedingly, and was very mortal. The Queen died of it on the 28th.
29th December, 1694. The smallpox outbreak worsened significantly and was highly deadly. The Queen passed away from it on the 28th.
13th January, 1694-95. The Thames was frozen over. The deaths by smallpox increased to five hundred more than in the preceding week. The King and Princess Anne reconciled, and she was invited to keep her Court at Whitehall, having hitherto lived privately at Berkeley House; she was desired to take into her family divers servants of the late Queen; to maintain them the King has assigned her £5,000 a quarter.
13th January, 1694-95. The Thames was frozen solid. The number of smallpox deaths rose by five hundred compared to the previous week. The King and Princess Anne made up, and she was invited to hold her court at Whitehall, having previously lived privately at Berkeley House; she was asked to bring some of the late Queen's servants into her household; to support them, the King assigned her £5,000 a quarter.
20th January, 1695. The frost and continual snow have now lasted five weeks.
20th January, 1695. The frost and constant snowfall have now gone on for five weeks.
February, 1695. Lord Spencer married the Duke of Newcastle's daughter, and our neighbor, Mr. Hussey, married a daughter of my cousin, George Evelyn, of Nutfield.
February, 1695. Lord Spencer married the Duke of Newcastle's daughter, and our neighbor, Mr. Hussey, married a daughter of my cousin, George Evelyn, from Nutfield.
3d February, 1695. The long frost intermitted, but not gone.
3rd February, 1695. The long frost paused, but it wasn’t over.
17th February, 1695. Called to London by Lord Godolphin, one of the Lords of the Treasury, offering me the treasurership of the hospital designed to be built at Greenwich for worn-out seamen.
17th February, 1695. I was summoned to London by Lord Godolphin, one of the Lords of the Treasury, who offered me the position of treasurer for the hospital that is set to be built at Greenwich for retired seamen.
24th February, 1695. I saw the Queen lie in state.
24th February, 1695. I saw the Queen lying in state.
27th February, 1695. The Marquis of Normanby told me King Charles had a design to buy all King Street, and build it nobly, it being the street leading to Westminster. This might have been done for the expense of the Queen's funeral, which was £50,000, against her desire.
27th February, 1695. The Marquis of Normanby told me King Charles planned to buy all of King Street and develop it impressively, as it leads to Westminster. This may have been intended to cover the expenses of the Queen's funeral, which cost £50,000, despite her wishes.
5th March, 1695. I went to see the ceremony. Never was so universal a mourning; all the Parliament men had cloaks given them, and four hundred poor women; all the streets hung and the middle of the street boarded and covered with black cloth. There were all the nobility, mayor, aldermen, judges, etc.
5th March, 1695. I went to witness the ceremony. The mourning was truly universal; all the members of Parliament received cloaks, along with four hundred poor women. Every street was draped, and the main road was lined and covered with black cloth. Everyone from the nobility, the mayor, aldermen, judges, and others were present.
8th March, 1695. I supped at the Bishop of Lichfield and Coventry's, who related to me the pious behavior of the Queen in all her sickness, which was admirable. She never inquired of what opinion persons were, who were objects of charity; that, on opening a cabinet, a paper[Pg 330] was found wherein she had desired that her body might not be opened, or any extraordinary expense at her funeral, whenever she should die. This paper was not found in time to be observed. There were other excellent things under her own hand, to the very least of her debts, which were very small, and everything in that exact method, as seldom is found in any private person. In sum, she was such an admirable woman, abating for taking the Crown without a more due apology, as does, if possible, outdo the renowned Queen Elizabeth.
8th March, 1695. I had dinner at the Bishop of Lichfield and Coventry's place, where he shared with me the remarkable piety of the Queen during her illness, which was truly admirable. She never asked about the opinions of those in need of charity; when a cabinet was opened, a paper[Pg 330] was found in which she requested that her body not be autopsied or that there be any extraordinary expenses for her funeral when she passed away. Unfortunately, this paper wasn't discovered in time to be followed. There were also other wonderful documents in her own handwriting, detailing even the smallest of her debts, which were quite minimal, all organized in a way that's rarely seen in any private individual. In conclusion, she was an exceptional woman, aside from her taking the Crown without a proper apology, rivaling even the renowned Queen Elizabeth, if that's even possible.
10th March, 1695. I dined at the Earl of Sunderland's with Lord Spencer. My Lord showed me his library, now again improved by many books bought at the sale of Sir Charles Scarborough, an eminent physician, which was the very best collection, especially of mathematical books, that was I believe in Europe, once designed for the King's Library at St. James's; but the Queen dying, who was the great patroness of that design, it was let fall, and the books were miserably dissipated.
10th March, 1695. I had dinner at the Earl of Sunderland's with Lord Spencer. He showed me his library, which has been further enhanced by several books purchased from the sale of Sir Charles Scarborough, a distinguished physician. This was arguably the best collection of books, especially in mathematics, that existed in Europe at one point, originally intended for the King's Library at St. James's. However, after the Queen, who was the main supporter of that project, passed away, it was abandoned, and the books were sadly dispersed.
The new edition of Camden's "Britannia" was now published (by Bishop Gibson), with great additions; those to Surrey were mine, so that I had one presented to me. Dr. Gale showed me a MS. of some parts of the New Testament in vulgar Latin, that had belonged to a monastery in the North of Scotland, which he esteemed to be about eight hundred years old; there were some considerable various readings observable, as in John i., and genealogy of St. Luke.
The new edition of Camden's "Britannia" has just been published (by Bishop Gibson), with significant additions; the sections on Surrey were my contribution, so I received a copy. Dr. Gale showed me a manuscript of some parts of the New Testament in common Latin, which had belonged to a monastery in northern Scotland and was estimated to be around eight hundred years old; there were several notable variations in text, such as in John 1 and the genealogy of St. Luke.
24th March, 1695. Easter Day. Mr. Duncomb, parson of this parish, preached, which he hardly comes to above once a year though but seven or eight miles off; a florid discourse, read out of his notes. The Holy Sacrament followed, which he administered with very little reverence, leaving out many prayers and exhortations; nor was there any oblation. This ought to be reformed, but my good brother did not well consider when he gave away this living and the next [Abinger].
24th March, 1695. Easter Sunday. Mr. Duncomb, the local pastor, preached today, which he barely does more than once a year even though he lives only seven or eight miles away. His sermon was elaborate but read from his notes. The Holy Communion followed, which he conducted with minimal reverence, skipping many prayers and exhortations; there was also no offering. This needs to be improved, but my good brother didn’t think it through when he gave away this parish and the next one [Abinger].
March, 1695. The latter end of the month sharp and severely cold, with much snow and hard frost; no appearance of spring.[Pg 331]
March, 1695. The end of the month is bitterly cold, with lots of snow and heavy frost; there are no signs of spring.[Pg 331]
31st March, 1695. Mr. Lucas preached in the afternoon at Wotton.
31st March, 1695. Mr. Lucas preached in the afternoon at Wotton.
7th April, 1695. Lord Halifax died suddenly at London, the day his daughter was married to the Earl of Nottingham's son at Burleigh. Lord H. was a very rich man, very witty, and in his younger days somewhat positive.
7th April, 1695. Lord Halifax died suddenly in London on the day his daughter married the son of the Earl of Nottingham at Burleigh. Lord H. was very wealthy, very witty, and in his younger days, somewhat assertive.
14th April, 1695. After a most severe, cold, and snowy winter, without almost any shower for many months, the wind continuing N. and E. and not a leaf appearing; the weather and wind now changed, some showers fell, and there was a remission of cold.
14th April, 1695. After a harsh, cold, and snowy winter, with almost no rain for many months, the wind was still coming from the north and east, and not a single leaf had appeared; the weather and wind have now changed, some rain has fallen, and there has been a break in the cold.
21st April, 1695. The spring begins to appear, yet the trees hardly leafed. Sir T. Cooke discovers what prodigious bribes have been given by some of the East India Company out of the stock, which makes a great clamor. Never were so many private bills passed for unsettling estates, showing the wonderful prodigality and decay of families.
21st April, 1695. Spring is starting to show, but the trees barely have leaves. Sir T. Cooke reveals the huge bribes given by some members of the East India Company from their profits, causing quite a stir. Never before have so many private bills been passed to disrupt estates, highlighting the astonishing wastefulness and decline of families.
5th May, 1695. I came to Deptford from Wotton, in order to the first meeting of the Commissioners for endowing an hospital for seamen at Greenwich; it was at the Guildhall, London. Present, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Keeper, Lord Privy Seal, Lord Godolphin, Duke of Shrewsbury, Duke of Leeds, Earls of Dorset and Monmouth, Commissioners of the Admiralty and Navy, Sir Robert Clayton, Sir Christopher Wren, and several more. The Commission was read by Mr. Lowndes, Secretary to the Lords of the Treasury, Surveyor-General.
5th May, 1695. I traveled to Deptford from Wotton for the first meeting of the Commissioners to fund a hospital for seamen at Greenwich; it was held at the Guildhall in London. Present were the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Lord Keeper, the Lord Privy Seal, Lord Godolphin, the Duke of Shrewsbury, the Duke of Leeds, the Earls of Dorset and Monmouth, Commissioners of the Admiralty and Navy, Sir Robert Clayton, Sir Christopher Wren, and several others. The Commission was read by Mr. Lowndes, Secretary to the Lords of the Treasury and Surveyor-General.
17th May, 1695. Second meeting of the Commissioners, and a committee appointed to go to Greenwich to survey the place, I being one of them.
17th May, 1695. Second meeting of the Commissioners, and a committee assigned to go to Greenwich to survey the location, and I was one of them.
21st May, 1695. We went to survey Greenwich, Sir Robert Clayton, Sir Christopher Wren, Mr. Travers, the King's Surveyor, Captain Sanders, and myself.
21st May, 1695. We went to check out Greenwich, Sir Robert Clayton, Sir Christopher Wren, Mr. Travers, the King's Surveyor, Captain Sanders, and I.
24th May, 1695. We made report of the state of Greenwich house, and how the standing part might be made serviceable at present for £6,000, and what ground would be requisite for the whole design. My Lord Keeper ordered me to prepare a book for subscriptions, and a preamble to it.
24th May, 1695. We reported on the condition of Greenwich house and how the main section could be made usable right now for £6,000, along with the land needed for the entire plan. My Lord Keeper instructed me to create a subscription book and a preamble for it.
31st May, 1695. Met again. Mr. Vanbrugh was made[Pg 332] secretary to the commission, by my nomination of him to the Lords, which was all done that day.
31st May, 1695. Met again. Mr. Vanbrugh was appointed[Pg 332] secretary to the commission, due to my recommendation to the Lords, which was all completed that day.
7th June, 1695. The commissioners met at Guildhall, when there were scruples and contests of the Lord Mayor, who would not meet, not being named as one of the quorum, so that a new commission was required, though the Lord Keeper and the rest thought it too nice a punctilio.
7th June, 1695. The commissioners gathered at Guildhall, but there were hesitations and disputes from the Lord Mayor, who refused to attend since he wasn't listed as one of the quorum. This meant a new commission was needed, although the Lord Keeper and the others considered it an overly particular issue.
14th May, 1695. Met at Guildhall, but could do nothing for want of a quorum.
14th May, 1695. Gathered at Guildhall, but we couldn’t accomplish anything because there weren’t enough members present.
5th July, 1695. At Guildhall; account of subscriptions, about £7,000 or £8,000.
5th July, 1695. At Guildhall; report of donations, around £7,000 to £8,000.
6th July, 1695. I dined at Lambeth, making my first visit to the Archbishop, where there was much company, and great cheer. After prayers in the evening, my Lord made me stay to show me his house, furniture, and garden, which were all very fine, and far beyond the usual Archbishops, not as affected by this, but being bought ready furnished by his predecessor. We discoursed of several public matters, particularly of the Princess of Denmark, who made so little figure.
6th July, 1695. I had lunch at Lambeth, making my first visit to the Archbishop, where there were a lot of guests and a great atmosphere. After evening prayers, my Lord asked me to stay and showed me his house, furniture, and garden, which were all very nice and much better than what you’d usually expect from Archbishops. He wasn’t showing off, though; he just bought it all furnished from his predecessor. We talked about several public issues, especially the Princess of Denmark, who wasn’t very noticeable.
11th July, 1695. Met at Guildhall; not a full committee, so nothing done.
11th July, 1695. Met at Guildhall; it wasn't a full committee, so nothing got done.
14th July, 1695. No sermon at church; but, after prayers, the names of all the parishioners were read, in order to gathering the tax of 4s. for marriages, burials, etc. A very imprudent tax, especially this reading the names, so that most went out of the church.
14th July, 1695. No sermon at church; but, after prayers, the names of all the parishioners were read, in order to collect the tax of 4s. for marriages, funerals, etc. A very unwise tax, especially with the reading of the names, which caused most to leave the church.
19th July, 1695. I dined at Sir Purbeck Temple's, near Croydon; his lady is aunt to my son-in-law, Draper; the house exactly furnished. WOTTONWent thence with my son and daughter to Wotton. At Wotton, Mr. Duncomb, parson of Albury, preached excellently.
19th July, 1695. I had dinner at Sir Purbeck Temple's, near Croydon; his wife is my son-in-law Draper's aunt; the house is perfectly furnished. WOTTONAfter that, my son and daughter and I went to Wotton. At Wotton, Mr. Duncomb, the pastor of Albury, delivered an excellent sermon.
28th July, 1695. A very wet season.
28th July, 1695. A really wet season.
11th August, 1695. The weather now so cold, that greater frosts were not always seen in the midst of winter; this succeeded much wet, and set harvest extremely back.
11th August, 1695. The weather is now so cold that stronger frosts haven't always been seen in the middle of winter; this followed a lot of rain and has significantly delayed the harvest.
25th September, 1695. Mr. Offley preached at Abinger; too much controversy on a point of no consequence, for the country people here. This was the first time I had heard him preach. Bombarding of Cadiz; a cruel and brutish way of making war, first began by the French.[Pg 333] The season wet, great storms, unseasonable harvest weather. My good and worthy friend, Captain Gifford, who that he might get some competence to live decently, adventured all he had in a voyage of two years to the East Indies, was, with another great ship, taken by some French men-of-war, almost within sight of England, to the loss of near £70,000, to my great sorrow, and pity of his wife, he being also a valiant and industrious man. The losses of this sort to the nation have been immense, and all through negligence, and little care to secure the same near our own coasts; of infinitely more concern to the public than spending their time in bombarding and ruining two or three paltry towns, without any benefit, or weakening our enemies, who, though they began, ought not to be imitated in an action totally averse to humanity, or Christianity.
25th September, 1695. Mr. Offley preached at Abinger; there was too much argument over an issue that doesn’t matter much to the local people. This was the first time I heard him preach. The bombardment of Cadiz, a brutal way of making war, first started with the French.[Pg 333] The weather is wet with great storms, making for an unseasonable harvest. My good and decent friend, Captain Gifford, who risked all he had for a chance to live comfortably by embarking on a two-year voyage to the East Indies, was captured along with another large ship by some French warships, almost in sight of England, resulting in a loss of nearly £70,000, which saddens me greatly, especially for his wife, as he was also a brave and hardworking man. The losses of this kind to the nation have been immense, all due to negligence and a lack of care to protect our coasts; this is of far greater concern to the public than wasting time bombarding and destroying two or three insignificant towns without any gain, or weakening our enemies, who, even though they started this, should not be emulated in an action that goes entirely against humanity and Christianity.
29th September, 1695. Very cold weather. Sir Purbeck Temple, uncle to my son Draper, died suddenly. A great funeral at Addiscombe. His lady being own aunt to my son Draper, he hopes for a good fortune, there being no heir. There had been a new meeting of the commissioners about Greenwich hospital, on the new commission, where the Lord Mayor, etc. appeared, but I was prevented by indisposition from attending. The weather very sharp, winter approaching apace. The King went a progress into the north, to show himself to the people against the elections, and was everywhere complimented, except at Oxford, where it was not as he expected, so that he hardly stopped an hour there, and having seen the theater, did not receive the banquet proposed. I dined with Dr. Gale at St. Paul's school, who showed me many curious passages out of some ancient Platonists' MSS. concerning the Trinity, which this great and learned person would publish, with many other rare things, if he was encouraged, and eased of the burden of teaching.
29th September, 1695. The weather is very cold. Sir Purbeck Temple, my son Draper's uncle, died suddenly. There was a big funeral at Addiscombe. Since his wife is Draper's own aunt, he’s hoping for a good inheritance since there’s no heir. The commissioners met again about the new commission for Greenwich hospital, with the Lord Mayor and others present, but I couldn’t attend due to feeling unwell. The weather is quite harsh; winter is approaching quickly. The King traveled up north to connect with the people ahead of the elections, and everywhere he went he received compliments, except in Oxford, where things didn’t go as he expected, so he barely stayed there for an hour. After checking out the theater, he didn’t accept the banquet that was offered. I had lunch with Dr. Gale at St. Paul’s school, who showed me many interesting excerpts from some ancient Platonists’ manuscripts about the Trinity. This great and knowledgeable person would publish them, along with many other rare items, if he were supported and relieved of his teaching duties.
25th October, 1695. The Archbishop and myself went to Hammersmith, to visit Sir Samuel Morland, who was entirely blind; a very mortifying sight. He showed us his invention of writing, which was very ingenious; also his wooden calendar, which instructed him all by feeling; and other pretty and useful inventions of mills, pumps, etc., and the pump he had erected that serves water to his garden, and to passengers, with an inscription, and[Pg 334] brings from a filthy part of the Thames near it a most perfect and pure water. He had newly buried £200 worth of music books six feet under ground, being, as he said, love songs and vanity. He plays himself psalms and religious hymns on the theorbo. Very mild weather the whole of October.
25th October, 1695. The Archbishop and I went to Hammersmith to visit Sir Samuel Morland, who was completely blind; it was quite a sad sight. He demonstrated his ingenious writing invention, as well as his wooden calendar, which he could read entirely by touch, and other interesting and useful inventions like mills and pumps. One pump he built provides water for his garden and for passersby, complete with an inscription, and[Pg 334] draws the cleanest water from a filthy part of the Thames nearby. He had recently buried £200 worth of music books six feet underground, claiming they were love songs and vanity. He plays psalms and religious hymns on the theorbo. The weather has been very mild throughout October.
10th November, 1695. Mr. Stanhope, Vicar of Lewisham, preached at Whitehall. He is one of the most accomplished preachers I ever heard, for matter, eloquence, action, voice, and I am told, of excellent conversation.
10th November, 1695. Mr. Stanhope, Vicar of Lewisham, preached at Whitehall. He is one of the most skilled preachers I've ever heard, in terms of content, eloquence, delivery, and voice, and I've heard he’s great in conversation too.
13th November, 1695. Famous fireworks and very chargeable, the King being returned from his progress. He stayed seven or eight days at Lord Sunderland's at Althorpe, where he was mightily entertained. These fireworks were shown before Lord Romney, master of the ordnance, in St. James's great square, where the King stood.
13th November, 1695. There were famous and expensive fireworks since the King had returned from his travels. He stayed at Lord Sunderland's place in Althorpe for seven or eight days, where he was greatly entertained. These fireworks were displayed in St. James's great square before Lord Romney, the master of the ordnance, where the King was present.
17th November, 1695. I spoke to the Archbishop of Canterbury to interest himself for restoring a room belonging to St. James's library, where the books want place.
17th November, 1695. I spoke to the Archbishop of Canterbury to get him involved in restoring a room belonging to St. James's library, where the books need a place.
21st November, 1695. I went to see Mr. Churchill's collection of rarities.
21st November, 1695. I went to check out Mr. Churchill's collection of curiosities.
23d November, 1695. To Lambeth, to get Mr. Williams continued in Boyle's lectures another year. Among others who dined there was Dr. Covel, the great Oriental traveler.
23rd November, 1695. Went to Lambeth to get Mr. Williams to continue in Boyle's lectures for another year. Among others who had dinner there was Dr. Covel, the renowned Oriental traveler.
1st December, 1695. I dined at Lord Sunderland's, now the great favorite and underhand politician, but not adventuring on any character, being obnoxious to the people for having twice changed his religion.
1st December, 1695. I had dinner at Lord Sunderland's, who is now a major favorite and a behind-the-scenes politician. He doesn't risk making a name for himself, as he is disliked by the public for having changed his religion twice.
23d December, 1695. The Parliament wondrously intent on ways to reform the coin; setting out a Proclamation prohibiting the currency of half-crowns, etc., which made much confusion among the people.
23d December, 1695. The Parliament was highly focused on finding ways to reform the currency; they issued a Proclamation banning the use of half-crowns, among other coins, which caused a lot of confusion among the public.
25th December, 1695. Hitherto mild, dark, misty, weather. Now snow and frost.
25th December, 1695. Until now, the weather has been mild, dark, and foggy. Now, it’s snowing and freezing.
12th January, 1695-96. Great confusion and distraction by reason of the clipped money, and the difficulty found in reforming it.
12th January, 1695-96. There was a lot of confusion and distraction due to the clipped money and the challenges in fixing it.
2d February, 1696. An extraordinary wet season, though temperate as to cold. The "Royal Sovereign" man-of-war burned at Chatham. It was built in 1637, and hav[Pg 335]ing given occasion to the levy of ship money was perhaps the cause of all the after troubles to this day. An earthquake in Dorsetshire by Portland, or rather a sinking of the ground suddenly for a large space, near the quarries of stone, hindering the conveyance of that material for the finishing St. Paul's.
2nd February, 1696. An unusually wet season, though mild in terms of cold. The "Royal Sovereign" man-of-war was burned at Chatham. It was built in 1637, and having led to the collection of ship money may have caused all the troubles that followed to this day. There was an earthquake in Dorsetshire near Portland, or rather a sudden sinking of the ground over a large area near the stone quarries, which hindered the transport of that material for finishing St. Paul's.
23d February, 1696. They now began to coin new money.
23rd February, 1696. They started to mint new currency.
26th February, 1696. There was now a conspiracy of about thirty knights, gentlemen, captains, many of them Irish and English Papists, and Nonjurors or Jacobites (so called), to murder King William on the first opportunity of his going either from Kensington, or to hunting, or to the chapel; and upon signal of fire to be given from Dover Cliff to Calais, an invasion was designed. In order to it there was a great army in readiness, men-of-war and transports, to join a general insurrection here, the Duke of Berwick having secretly come to London to head them, King James attending at Calais with the French army. It was discovered by some of their own party. £1,000 reward was offered to whoever could apprehend any of the thirty named. Most of those who were engaged in it, were taken and secured. The Parliament, city, and all the nation, congratulate the discovery; and votes and resolutions were passed that, if King William should ever be assassinated, it should be revenged on the Papists and party through the nation; an Act of Association drawing up to empower the Parliament to sit on any such accident, till the Crown should be disposed of according to the late settlement at the Revolution. All Papists, in the meantime, to be banished ten miles from London. This put the nation into an incredible disturbance and general animosity against the French King and King James. The militia of the nation was raised, several regiments were sent for out of Flanders, and all things put in a posture to encounter a descent. This was so timed by the enemy, that while we were already much discontented by the greatness of the taxes, and corruption of the money, etc., we had like to have had very few men-of-war near our coasts; but so it pleased God that Admiral Rooke wanting a wind to pursue his voyage to the Straits, that squadron, with others at Portsmouth and other places, were still in the Channel,[Pg 336] and were soon brought up to join with the rest of the ships which could be got together, so that there is hope this plot may be broken. I look on it as a very great deliverance and prevention by the providence of God. Though many did formerly pity King James's condition, this design of assassination and bringing over a French army, alienated many o£ his friends, and was likely to produce a more perfect establishment of King William.
26th February, 1696. There was now a conspiracy involving about thirty knights, gentlemen, and captains, many of whom were Irish and English Catholics, as well as Nonjurors or Jacobites. They planned to murder King William at the first opportunity, whether he was leaving Kensington, going hunting, or visiting the chapel. They intended for a signal of fire to be sent from Dover Cliff to Calais to initiate an invasion. There was a large army ready—ships and transport vessels—intended to join a widespread uprising here, with the Duke of Berwick secretly arriving in London to lead them, while King James waited in Calais with the French army. The plot was revealed by some within their own ranks. A reward of £1,000 was offered to anyone who could apprehend any of the thirty named conspirators. Most of those involved were captured and detained. The Parliament, the city, and the whole nation celebrated the discovery; resolutions were passed stating that if King William were ever assassinated, there would be retaliation against Catholics and their supporters throughout the nation. An Act of Association was being drawn up to empower Parliament to act in such an event until the Crown was dealt with according to the recent arrangement made during the Revolution. In the meantime, all Catholics were to be removed ten miles from London. This situation created tremendous unrest and strong resentment against the French King and King James. The nation’s militia was mobilized, and several regiments were called in from Flanders, with preparations made to respond to a potential invasion. The enemy timed this plot perfectly, as we were already deeply dissatisfied with high taxes, currency issues, etc., and we were at risk of having very few warships near our coasts. However, it pleased God that Admiral Rooke, who was short on wind for his voyage to the Straits, had his squadron, along with others at Portsmouth and other locations, still in the Channel, and they were soon called up to join the other gathered ships, giving hope that this plot could be thwarted. I see this as a significant deliverance and prevention by God’s providence. Although many previously sympathized with King James's situation, this assassination plot and the attempt to bring over a French army alienated many of his supporters and likely contributed to a more solid establishment for King William.
1st March, 1696. The wind continuing N. and E. all this week, brought so many of our men-of-war together that, though most of the French finding their design detected and prevented, made a shift to get into Calais and Dunkirk roads, we wanting fire-ships and bombs to disturb them; yet they were so engaged among the sands and flats, that 'tis said they cut their masts and flung their great guns overboard to lighten their vessels. We are yet upon them. This deliverance is due solely to God. French were to have invaded at once England, Scotland, and Ireland.
1st March, 1696. With the wind continuing from the north and east all week, many of our warships gathered together. Although most of the French, realizing their plan was discovered and thwarted, managed to reach the waters of Calais and Dunkirk, we were short on fire ships and bombs to disturb them. Still, they got stuck in the sands and shallows, and it's said they had to cut their masts and toss their heavy guns overboard to lighten their ships. We are still pursuing them. This deliverance is entirely due to God. The French were supposed to invade England, Scotland, and Ireland all at once.
8th March, 1696. Divers of the conspirators tried and condemned.
8th March, 1696. Several of the conspirators were tried and found guilty.
Vesuvius breaking out, terrified Naples. Three of the unhappy wretches, whereof one was a priest, were executed82 for intending to assassinate the King; they acknowledged their intention, but acquitted King James of inciting them to it, and died very penitent. Divers more in danger, and some very considerable persons.
Vesuvius erupted, terrifying Naples. Three of the unfortunate souls, one of whom was a priest, were executed82 for planning to assassinate the King. They admitted their intentions but cleared King James of any involvement in provoking them, and they died full of remorse. Many others were in danger, including some notable figures.
Great frost and cold.
Freezing cold.
6th April, 1696. I visited Mr. Graham in the Fleet.
6th April, 1696. I visited Mr. Graham in the Fleet.
10th April, 1696. The quarters of Sir William Perkins and Sir John Friend, lately executed on the plot, with Perkins's head, were set up at Temple Bar, a dismal sight, which many pitied. I think there never was such at Temple Bar till now, except once in the time of King Charles II., namely, of Sir Thomas Armstrong.83
10th April, 1696. The quarters of Sir William Perkins and Sir John Friend, who were recently executed for their conspiracy, along with Perkins's head, were displayed at Temple Bar, a grim sight that many people felt sorry for. I don't think there has ever been anything like this at Temple Bar before, except once during the reign of King Charles II., specifically with Sir Thomas Armstrong.83
12th April, 1696. A very fine spring season.
12th April, 1696. A beautiful spring season.
19th April, 1696. Great offense taken at the three ministers who absolved Sir William Perkins and Friend at Tyburn. One of them (Snatt) was a son of my old school[Pg 337]master. This produced much altercation as to the canonicalness of the action.
19th April, 1696. A lot of anger was directed at the three ministers who pardoned Sir William Perkins and Friend at Tyburn. One of them (Snatt) was the son of my old school[Pg 337]master. This led to a lot of debate about the legitimacy of the action.
21st April, 1696. We had a meeting at Guildhall of the grand committee about settling the draught of Greenwich hospital.
21st April, 1696. We had a meeting at Guildhall with the grand committee to finalize the draft of Greenwich hospital.
23d April, 1696. I went to Eton, and dined with Dr. Godolphin, the provost. The schoolmaster assured me there had not been for twenty years a more pregnant youth in that place than my grandson. I went to see the King's House at Kensington. It is very noble, though not great. The gallery furnished with the best pictures [from] all the houses, of Titian, Raphael, Correggio, Holbein, Julio Romano, Bassan, Vandyke, Tintoretto, and others; a great collection of porcelain; and a pretty private library. The gardens about it very delicious.
23rd April, 1696. I went to Eton and had lunch with Dr. Godolphin, the provost. The schoolmaster told me there hasn’t been a more impressive student there in twenty years than my grandson. I went to see the King’s House at Kensington. It’s very grand, though not huge. The gallery is filled with the best paintings from various artists, including Titian, Raphael, Correggio, Holbein, Julio Romano, Bassan, Vandyke, Tintoretto, and others; a great collection of porcelain; and a nice private library. The gardens around it are quite lovely.
26th April, 1696. Dr. Sharp preached at the Temple. His prayer before the sermon was one of the most excellent compositions I ever heard.
26th April, 1696. Dr. Sharp preached at the Temple. His prayer before the sermon was one of the best I’ve ever heard.
28th April, 1696. The Venetian Ambassador made a stately entry with fifty footmen, many on horseback, four rich coaches, and a numerous train of gallants. More executions this week of the assassins. Oates dedicated a most villainous, reviling book against King James, which he presumed to present to King William, who could not but abhor it, speaking so infamously and untruly of his late beloved Queen's own father.
28th April, 1696. The Venetian Ambassador made a grand entrance with fifty footmen, many on horseback, four lavish coaches, and a large entourage of gentlemen. There were more executions this week of the assassins. Oates published a highly defamatory book against King James, which he dared to present to King William, who could only detest it, as it spoke so disgracefully and falsely about his late beloved Queen's own father.
2d May, 1696. I dined at Lambeth, being summoned to meet my co-trustees, the Archbishop, Sir Henry Ashurst, and Mr. Serjeant Rotheram, to consult about settling Mr. Boyle's lecture for a perpetuity; which we concluded upon, by buying a rent charge of £50 per annum, with the stock in our hands.
2nd May, 1696. I had lunch at Lambeth, being called to meet my fellow trustees, the Archbishop, Sir Henry Ashurst, and Mr. Serjeant Rotheram, to discuss establishing Mr. Boyle's lecture for a lasting arrangement; which we decided on by purchasing a rent charge of £50 per year, using the funds we had available.
6th May, 1696. I went to Lambeth, to meet at dinner the Countess of Sunderland and divers ladies. We dined in the Archbishop's wife's apartment with his Grace, and stayed late; yet I returned to Deptford at night.
6th May, 1696. I went to Lambeth to have dinner with the Countess of Sunderland and some other ladies. We dined in the Archbishop's wife's room with his Grace and stayed late; still, I returned to Deptford at night.
13th May, 1696. I went to London to meet my son, newly come from Ireland, indisposed. Money still continuing exceedingly scarce, so that none was paid or received, but all was on trust, the mint not supplying for common necessities. The Association with an oath required of all lawyers and officers, on pain of præmunire,[Pg 338] whereby men were obliged to renounce King James as no rightful king, and to revenge King William's death, if happening by assassination. This to be taken by all the Counsel by a day limited, so that the Courts of Chancery and King's Bench hardly heard any cause in Easter Term, so many crowded to take the oath. This was censured as a very entangling contrivance of the Parliament in expectation, that many in high office would lay down, and others surrender. Many gentlemen taken up on suspicion of the late plot, were now discharged out of prison.
13th May, 1696. I went to London to meet my son, who had just arrived from Ireland and was feeling unwell. Money was still extremely scarce, so no transactions were made—everything was based on trust, as the mint wasn’t providing for basic needs. The Association required all lawyers and officials to take an oath, under the threat of præmunire, whereby people had to reject King James as the rightful king and seek revenge for King William's assassination if it occurred. This oath had to be taken by all Counsel by a set deadline, which meant that the Courts of Chancery and King’s Bench barely heard any cases during Easter Term, as many rushed to take the oath. This was criticized as a complicated scheme by Parliament, hoping that many in high positions would resign or withdraw. Many gentlemen who had been detained on suspicion of the recent plot were now released from prison.
29th May, 1696. We settled divers offices, and other matters relating to workmen, for the beginning of Greenwich hospital.
29th May, 1696. We organized various roles and other issues related to the workers for the start of Greenwich hospital.
1st June, 1696. I went to Deptford to dispose of our goods, in order to letting the house for three years to Vice Admiral Benbow, with condition to keep up the garden. This was done soon after.
1st June, 1696. I went to Deptford to sell our goods so we could rent the house for three years to Vice Admiral Benbow, with the condition that he would take care of the garden. This was taken care of shortly after.
4th June, 1696. A committee met at Whitehall about Greenwich Hospital, at Sir Christopher Wren's, his Majesty's Surveyor-General. We made the first agreement with divers workmen and for materials; and gave the first order for proceeding on the foundation, and for weekly payments to the workmen, and a general account to be monthly.
4th June, 1696. A committee gathered at Whitehall to discuss Greenwich Hospital, with Sir Christopher Wren, the King’s Surveyor-General. We reached our initial agreement with several workers and for materials; and we issued the first order to start the foundation, set up weekly payments for the workers, and established a monthly general report.
11th June, 1696. Dined at Lord Pembroke's, Lord Privy Seal, a very worthy gentleman. He showed me divers rare pictures of very many of the old and best masters, especially one of M. Angelo of a man gathering fruit to give to a woman, and a large book of the best drawings of the old masters. Sir John Fenwick, one of the conspirators, was taken. Great subscriptions in Scotland to their East India Company. Want of current money to carry on the smallest concerns, even for daily provisions in the markets. Guineas lowered to twenty-two shillings, and great sums daily transported to Holland, where it yields more, with other treasure sent to pay the armies, and nothing considerable coined of the new and now only current stamp, cause such a scarcity that tumults are every day feared, nobody paying or receiving money; so imprudent was the late Parliament to condemn the old though clipped and corrupted, till they had provided supplies. To this add the fraud of the[Pg 339] bankers and goldsmiths, who having gotten immense riches by extortion, keep up their treasure in expectation of enhancing its value. Duncombe, not long since a mean goldsmith, having made a purchase of the late Duke of Buckingham's estate at nearly £90,000, and reputed to have nearly as much in cash. Banks and lotteries every day set up.
11th June, 1696. Had dinner at Lord Pembroke's, the Lord Privy Seal, a really decent guy. He showed me several rare paintings by many of the old masters, especially one by Michelangelo of a man gathering fruit to give to a woman, along with a large book featuring the best drawings of the old masters. Sir John Fenwick, one of the conspirators, was captured. There are significant contributions in Scotland to their East India Company. There's a shortage of cash for even the smallest transactions, including daily supplies in the markets. Guineas have dropped to twenty-two shillings, and large amounts of money are being sent to Holland, where it’s worth more, along with other funds sent to pay the armies. There's nothing substantial being minted with the new stamp, leading to a scarcity that makes riots a daily threat, as no one is paying or accepting money; the recent Parliament was foolish to reject the old coins, even though they were clipped and damaged, before arranging for new supplies. On top of this, there’s the deception of the bankers and goldsmiths, who have amassed great wealth through extortion but are hoarding their treasure in hopes of increasing its value. Duncombe, who was recently just an unknown goldsmith, purchased the late Duke of Buckingham's estate for nearly £90,000 and is rumored to have almost as much in cash. Banks and lotteries are being set up every day.
18th June, 1696. The famous trial between my Lord Bath and Lord Montague for an estate of £11,000 a year, left by the Duke of Albemarle, wherein on several trials had been spent,£20,000 between them. The Earl of Bath was cast on evident forgery.
18th June, 1696. The famous trial between Lord Bath and Lord Montague over an estate worth £11,000 a year, left by the Duke of Albemarle, had already cost them £20,000 in various legal battles. The Earl of Bath was found guilty of clear forgery.
20th June, 1696. I made my Lord Cheney a visit at Chelsea, and saw those ingenious waterworks invented by Mr. Winstanley, wherein were some things very surprising and extraordinary.
20th June, 1696. I visited Lord Cheney in Chelsea and saw those impressive waterworks designed by Mr. Winstanley, which contained some very surprising and extraordinary features.
21st June, 1696. An exceedingly rainy, cold, unseasonable summer, yet the city was very healthy.
21st June, 1696. An unusually rainy, cold, and out-of-season summer, yet the city remained very healthy.
25th June, 1696. A trial in the Common Pleas between the Lady Purbeck Temple and Mr. Temple, a nephew of Sir Purbeck, concerning a deed set up to take place of several wills. This deed was proved to be forged. The cause went on my lady's side. This concerning my son-in-law, Draper, I stayed almost all day at Court. A great supper was given to the jury, being persons of the best condition in Buckinghamshire.
25th June, 1696. A trial in the Common Pleas between Lady Purbeck Temple and Mr. Temple, a nephew of Sir Purbeck, regarding a deed meant to replace several wills. This deed was shown to be forged. The case favored my lady. This involved my son-in-law, Draper, so I stayed almost all day at Court. A big dinner was provided for the jury, who were some of the most respected people in Buckinghamshire.
30th June, 1696. I went with a select committee of the Commissioners for Greenwich Hospital, and with Sir Christopher Wren, where with him I laid the first stone of the intended foundation, precisely at five o'clock in the evening, after we had dined together. Mr. Flamstead, the King's Astronomical Professor, observing the punctual time by instruments.
30th June, 1696. I went with a special committee of the Commissioners for Greenwich Hospital and Sir Christopher Wren, where I helped lay the first stone of the intended foundation, exactly at five o'clock in the evening, after we had dinner together. Mr. Flamstead, the King's Astronomical Professor, was keeping track of the precise time with instruments.
4th July, 1696. Note that my Lord Godolphin was the first of the subscribers who paid any money to this noble fabric.
4th July, 1696. Note that my Lord Godolphin was the first subscriber to contribute any money to this noble project.
7th July, 1696. A northern wind altering the weather with a continual and impetuous rain of three days and nights changed it into perfect winter.
7th July, 1696. A northern wind changed the weather with an unending and fierce rain for three days and nights, turning it into full winter.
12th July, 1696. Very unseasonable and uncertain weather.
12th July, 1696. The weather is very unpredictable and out of season.
26th July, 1696. So little money in the nation that Exchequer Tallies, of which I had for £2,000 on the[Pg 340] best fund in England, the Post Office, nobody would take at 30 per cent discount.
26th July, 1696. There's so little money in the country that Exchequer Tallies, which I had for £2,000 on the[Pg 340] best fund in England, the Post Office, nobody would accept at a 30 percent discount.
3d August, 1696. The Bank lending the £200,000 to pay the array in Flanders, that had done nothing against the enemy, had so exhausted the treasure of the nation, that one could not have borrowed money under 14 or 15 per cent on bills, or on Exchequer Tallies under 30 per cent. Reasonable good harvest weather. I went to Lambeth and dined with the Archbishop, who had been at Court on the complaint against Dr. Thomas Watson, Bishop of St. David's, who was suspended for simony. The Archbishop told me how unsatisfied he was with the Canon law, and how exceedingly unreasonable all their pleadings appeared to him.
3rd August, 1696. The Bank lending £200,000 to pay the troops in Flanders, who hadn’t achieved anything against the enemy, had depleted the nation’s treasury so much that money couldn't be borrowed for less than 14 or 15 percent on bills, or under 30 percent on Exchequer Tallies. The harvest weather was reasonably good. I went to Lambeth and had dinner with the Archbishop, who had been at Court regarding the complaint against Dr. Thomas Watson, Bishop of St. David's, who had been suspended for simony. The Archbishop expressed how dissatisfied he was with Canon law and how unreasonable all their arguments seemed to him.
September, 1696. Fine seasonable weather, and a great harvest after a cold, wet summer. Scarcity in Scotland.
September, 1696. Pleasant weather and a bountiful harvest following a chilly, rainy summer. Shortage in Scotland.
6th September, 1696. I went to congratulate the marriage of a daughter of Mr. Boscawen to the son of Sir Philip Meadows; she is niece to my Lord Godolphin, married at Lambeth by the Archbishop, 30th of August. After above six months' stay in London about Greenwich Hospital, I returned to Wotton.
6th September, 1696. I went to congratulate Mr. Boscawen's daughter on her marriage to Sir Philip Meadows' son; she is the niece of Lord Godolphin and was married at Lambeth by the Archbishop on the 30th of August. After staying in London for over six months regarding Greenwich Hospital, I returned to Wotton.
24th October, 1696. Unseasonable stormy weather, and an ill seedtime.
24th October, 1696. Unseasonably stormy weather and a bad planting season.
November, 1696. Lord Godolphin retired from the Treasury, who was the first Commissioner and most skillful manager of all.
November, 1696. Lord Godolphin stepped down from the Treasury; he was the first Commissioner and the most skilled manager of all.
8th November, 1696. The first frost began fiercely, but lasted not long. More plots talked of. Search for Jacobites so called.
8th November, 1696. The first frost hit hard, but it didn't last long. More plots are being discussed. The hunt for those called Jacobites continues.
15th-23d November, 1696. Very stormy weather, rain, and inundations.
15th-23rd November, 1696. Very stormy weather, rain, and floods.
13th December, 1696. Continuance of extreme frost and snow.
13th December, 1696. Ongoing extreme frost and snow.
17th January, 1696-7. The severe frost and weather relented, but again froze with snow. Conspiracies continue against King William. Sir John Fenwick was beheaded.
17th January, 1696-7. The harsh frost and cold weather eased up but then froze again with snow. Plots against King William are still ongoing. Sir John Fenwick was executed by beheading.
7th February, 1697. Severe frost continued with snow. Soldiers in the armies and garrison towns frozen to death on their posts.
7th February, 1697. A harsh frost persisted along with snow. Soldiers in the armies and garrison towns froze to death while on duty.
(Here a leaf of the MS. is lost.)
(Here a leaf of the MS. is lost.)
17th August, 1697. I came to Wotton after three months' absence.
17th August, 1697. I arrived at Wotton after being away for three months.
September, 1697. Very bright weather, but with sharp east wind. My son came from London in his melancholy indisposition.
September, 1697. The weather was very bright, but there was a strong east wind. My son returned from London feeling down and unwell.
12th September, 1697. Mr. Duncombe, the rector, came and preached after an absence of two years, though only living seven or eight miles off [at Ashted]. Welcome tidings of the Peace.
12th September, 1697. Mr. Duncombe, the rector, came and preached after being away for two years, even though he lived only seven or eight miles away [at Ashted]. Good news of the Peace.
3d October, 1697. So great were the storms all this week, that near a thousand people were lost going into the Texel.
3rd October, 1697. The storms this week were so severe that nearly a thousand people were lost trying to enter the Texel.
16th November, 1697. The King's entry very pompous; but is nothing approaching that of King Charles II.
16th November, 1697. The King's entrance was very grand; however, it doesn't compare to that of King Charles II.
2d December, 1697. Thanksgiving Day for the Peace, the King and a great Court at Whitehall. The Bishop of Salisbury preached, or rather made a florid panegyric, on 2 Chron. ix. 7, 8. The evening concluded with fireworks and illuminations of great expense.
2nd December, 1697. Thanksgiving Day for the Peace, the King and a large court at Whitehall. The Bishop of Salisbury delivered a lengthy praise-filled sermon on 2 Chronicles 9:7-8. The evening ended with expensive fireworks and celebrations.
5th December, 1697. Was the first Sunday that St. Paul's had had service performed in it since it was burned in 1666.
5th December, 1697. This was the first Sunday that St. Paul's had a service held in it since it was burned down in 1666.
6th December, 1697. I went to Kensington with the Sheriff, Knights, and chief gentlemen of Surrey, to present their address to the King. The Duke of Norfolk promised to introduce it, but came so late, that it was presented before be came. This insignificant ceremony was brought in in Cromwell's time, and has ever since continued with offers of life and fortune to whoever happened to have the power. I dined at Sir Richard Onslow's, who treated almost all the gentlemen of Surrey. When we had half dined, the Duke of Norfolk came in to make his excuse.
6th December, 1697. I went to Kensington with the Sheriff, Knights, and prominent gentlemen of Surrey to present their address to the King. The Duke of Norfolk promised to introduce it, but arrived so late that it was presented before he got there. This trivial ceremony began in Cromwell's time and has continued ever since, with promises of life and fortune to whoever happened to be in power. I had dinner at Sir Richard Onslow's, who hosted almost all the gentlemen of Surrey. Just as we were halfway through dinner, the Duke of Norfolk came in to apologize.
12th December, 1697. At the Temple Church; it was very long before the service began, staying for the Comptroller of the Inner Temple, where was to be kept a riotous and reveling Christmas, according to custom.
12th December, 1697. At the Temple Church; it took a long time for the service to start, waiting for the Comptroller of the Inner Temple, where a wild and festive Christmas celebration was planned, just like always.
18th December, 1697. At Lambeth, to Dr. Bentley, about the Library at St. James's.
18th December, 1697. At Lambeth, to Dr. Bentley, about the Library at St. James's.
23d December, 1697. I returned to Wotton.
23rd December, 1697. I came back to Wotton.
1697-98. A great Christmas kept at Wotton, open house, much company. I presented my book of Medals, etc., to divers noblemen, before I exposed it to sale.[Pg 342]
1697-98. A fantastic Christmas celebrated at Wotton, with an open house and a lot of guests. I showed my book of Medals, etc., to several noblemen before I put it up for sale.[Pg 342]
2d January, 1698. Dr. Fulham, who lately married my niece, preached against atheism, a very eloquent discourse, somewhat improper for most of the audience at [Wotton], but fitted for some other place, and very apposite to the profane temper of the age.
2d January, 1698. Dr. Fulham, who recently married my niece, gave a sermon against atheism, which was a very eloquent speech, somewhat unsuitable for most of the audience at [Wotton], but appropriate for a different setting, and highly relevant to the disrespectful attitude of the times.
5th January, 1698. Whitehall burned, nothing but walls and ruins left.
5th January, 1698. Whitehall burned down, leaving just walls and rubble.
30th January, 1698. The imprisonment of the great banker, Duncombe: censured by Parliament; acquitted by the Lords; sent again to the Tower by the Commons.
30th January, 1698. The imprisonment of the prominent banker, Duncombe: criticized by Parliament; cleared by the Lords; sent back to the Tower by the Commons.
The Czar of Muscovy being come to England, and having a mind to see the building of ships, hired my house at Sayes Court, and made it his court and palace, newly furnished for him by the King.84
The Czar of Muscovy came to England and wanted to see ships being built, so he rented my house at Sayes Court, which the King had newly furnished for him, and turned it into his court and palace.84
21st April, 1698. The Czar went from my house to return home. An exceedingly sharp and cold season.
21st April, 1698. The Czar left my house to head back home. It was an extremely cold and brisk time of year.
8th May, 1698. An extraordinary great snow and frost, nipping the corn and other fruits. Corn at nine shillings a bushel [£18 a load].
8th May, 1698. An exceptionally heavy snow and frost, damaging the corn and other crops. Corn priced at nine shillings a bushel [£18 a load].
30th May, 1698. I dined at Mr. Pepys's, where I heard the rare voice of Mr. Pule, who was lately come from Italy, reputed the most excellent singer we had ever had. He sung several compositions of the late Dr. Purcell.
30th May, 1698. I had dinner at Mr. Pepys's place, where I heard the amazing voice of Mr. Pule, who had just returned from Italy and was considered the best singer we had ever had. He sang several pieces by the late Dr. Purcell.
5th June, 1698. Dr. White, late Bishop of Norwich, who had been ejected for not complying with Government, was buried in St. Gregory's churchyard, or vault, at St. Paul's. His hearse was accompanied by two non-juror bishops, Dr. Turner of Ely, and Dr. Lloyd, with forty other non-juror clergymen, who would not stay the Office of the burial, because the Dean of St. Paul's had appointed a conforming minister to read the Office; at which all much wondered, there being nothing in that Office which mentioned the present King.
5th June, 1698. Dr. White, the former Bishop of Norwich, who had been removed for not complying with the government, was buried in the churchyard, or vault, of St. Gregory at St. Paul's. His funeral procession included two non-juror bishops, Dr. Turner of Ely and Dr. Lloyd, along with forty other non-juror clergymen, who refused to participate in the burial service because the Dean of St. Paul's had appointed a minister who conformed to the government to lead the service; this surprised everyone, as there was nothing in that service that referred to the current King.
8th June, 1698. I went to congratulate the marriage of Mr. Godolphin with the Earl of Marlborough's daughter.[Pg 343]
8th June, 1698. I went to congratulate Mr. Godolphin on his marriage to the Earl of Marlborough's daughter.[Pg 343]
9th June, 1698. To Deptford, to see how miserably the Czar had left my house, after three months making it his Court. I got Sir Christopher Wren, the King's surveyor, and Mr. London, his gardener, to go and estimate the repairs, for which they allowed £150 in their report to the Lords of the Treasury. I then went to see the foundation of the Hall and Chapel at Greenwich Hospital.
9th June, 1698. I went to Deptford to check how poorly the Czar had left my house after spending three months using it as his Court. I got Sir Christopher Wren, the King's surveyor, and Mr. London, his gardener, to come and assess the repairs, and they reported a cost of £150 to the Lords of the Treasury. After that, I went to see the foundation of the Hall and Chapel at Greenwich Hospital.
6th August, 1698. I dined with Pepys, where was Captain Dampier,85 who had been a famous buccaneer, had brought hither the painted Prince Job, and printed a relation of his very strange adventure, and his observations. He was now going abroad again by the King's encouragement, who furnished a ship of 290 tons. He seemed a more modest man than one would imagine by the relation of the crew he had assorted with. He brought a map of his observations of the course of the winds in the South Sea, and assured us that the maps hitherto extant were all false as to the Pacific Sea, which he makes on the south of the line, that on the north end running by the coast of Peru being extremely tempestuous.
6th August, 1698. I had dinner with Pepys, where Captain Dampier, a well-known buccaneer, was also present. He had brought with him the painted Prince Job and published an account of his very unusual adventure and his observations. He was preparing to go abroad again with the King's support, who provided a 290-ton ship. He seemed more modest than one might expect given the crew he had associated with. He brought a map of his observations regarding the winds in the South Sea, and he assured us that the existing maps were all inaccurate concerning the Pacific Sea, which he placed south of the equator, while the northern end by the coast of Peru is extremely stormy.
25th September, 1698. Dr. Foy came to me to use my interest with Lord Sunderland for his being made Professor of Physic at Oxford, in the King's gift. I went also to the Archbishop in his behalf.
25th September, 1698. Dr. Foy came to me to ask for my support with Lord Sunderland for him to become Professor of Physic at Oxford, a position granted by the King. I also went to the Archbishop on his behalf.
7th December, 1698. Being one of the Council of the Royal Society, I was named to be of the committee to wait on our new President, the Lord Chancellor, our Secretary, Dr. Sloane, and Sir R. Southwell, last Vice-President, carrying our book of statutes; the office of the President being read, his Lordship subscribed his name, and took the oaths according to our statutes as a Corporation for the improvement of natural knowledge. Then his Lordship made a short compliment concerning the honor the Society had done him, and how ready he would be to promote so noble a design, and come himself among us, as often as the attendance on the public would permit; and so we took our leave.
7th December, 1698. As a member of the Council of the Royal Society, I was appointed to the committee to meet with our new President, the Lord Chancellor, along with our Secretary, Dr. Sloane, and Sir R. Southwell, the last Vice-President. We brought our book of statutes; after reading the President’s office, his Lordship signed his name and took the oaths according to our statutes as a Corporation aimed at advancing natural knowledge. Then, his Lordship gave a brief compliment about the honor the Society had shown him, expressing his willingness to support such a noble cause and to join us as often as his public duties would allow; and then we took our leave.
18th December, 1698. Very warm, but exceedingly stormy.[Pg 344]
18th December, 1698. Very warm, but extremely stormy.[Pg 344]
January, 1698-99. My cousin Pierrepoint died. She was daughter to Sir John Evelyn, of Wilts, my father's nephew; she was widow to William Pierrepoint, brother to the Marquis of Dorchester, and mother to Evelyn Pierrepoint, Earl of Kingston; a most excellent and prudent lady.
January, 1698-99. My cousin Pierrepoint passed away. She was the daughter of Sir John Evelyn from Wilts, my father's nephew; she was the widow of William Pierrepoint, brother to the Marquis of Dorchester, and mother to Evelyn Pierrepoint, Earl of Kingston; a truly remarkable and wise lady.
The House of Commons persist in refusing more than 7,000 men to be a standing army, and no strangers to be in the number. This displeased the Court party. Our county member, Sir R. Onslow, opposed it also; which might reconcile him to the people, who began to suspect him.
The House of Commons continues to refuse to allow more than 7,000 men to be a standing army, and no outsiders are included in that number. This annoyed the Court party. Our county representative, Sir R. Onslow, opposed it as well, which might win him back some support from the people, who were starting to doubt him.
17th February, 1699. My grandson went to Oxford with Dr. Mander, the Master of Baliol College, where he was entered a fellow-commoner.
17th February, 1699. My grandson went to Oxford with Dr. Mander, the Master of Baliol College, where he was admitted as a fellow-commoner.
19th February, 1699. A most furious wind, such as has not happened for many years, doing great damage to houses and trees, by the fall of which several persons were killed.
19th February, 1699. A very fierce wind, unlike anything we've seen in many years, caused significant damage to buildings and trees, resulting in several people being killed by the falling debris.
5th March, 1699. The old East India Company lost their business against the new Company, by ten votes in Parliament, so many of their friends being absent, going to see a tiger baited by dogs.
5th March, 1699. The old East India Company lost their business to the new Company by ten votes in Parliament, as many of their supporters were absent, going to watch a tiger being baited by dogs.
The persecuted Vaudois, who were banished out of Savoy, were received by the German Protestant Princes.
The persecuted Vaudois, who were expelled from Savoy, were welcomed by the German Protestant Princes.
24th March, 1699. My only remaining son died after a tedious languishing sickness, contracted in Ireland, and increased here, to my exceeding grief and affliction; leaving me one grandson, now at Oxford, whom I pray God to prosper and be the support of the Wotton family. He was aged forty-four years and about three months. He had been six years one of the Commissioners of the Revenue in Ireland, with great ability and reputation.
24th March, 1699. My only surviving son passed away after a long and exhausting illness he caught in Ireland, which worsened here, causing me immense sorrow and distress; leaving me with one grandson, currently at Oxford, whom I pray God will help and support the Wotton family. He was 44 years old and about three months. He had served for six years as one of the Commissioners of the Revenue in Ireland, showing great skill and earning a good reputation.
26th March, 1699. After an extraordinary storm, there came up the Thames a whale which was fifty-six feet long. Such, and a larger of the spout kind, was killed there forty years ago (June 1658). That year died Cromwell.
26th March, 1699. After an incredible storm, a whale measuring fifty-six feet long appeared in the Thames. A similar, and even larger, spouted whale was killed there forty years ago (June 1658). That year, Cromwell passed away.
30th March, 1699. My deceased son was buried in the vault at Wotton, according to his desire.
30th March, 1699. My late son was laid to rest in the vault at Wotton, as he wished.
The Duke of Devon lost £1,900 at a horse race at Newmarket.
The Duke of Devon lost £1,900 at a horse race in Newmarket.
The King preferring his young favorite Earl of Albemarle to be first Commander of his Guard, the Duke of[Pg 345] Ormond laid down his commission. This of the Dutch Lord passing over his head, was exceedingly resented by everybody.
The King chose his young favorite, the Earl of Albemarle, to be the first Commander of his Guard, and the Duke of[Pg 345] Ormond resigned his commission. This decision, with the Dutch Lord being preferred over him, was deeply resented by everyone.
April, 1699. Lord Spencer purchased an incomparable library86 of ... wherein, among other rare books, were several that were printed at the first invention of that wonderful art, as particularly "Tully's Offices, etc." There was a Homer and a Suidas in a very good Greek character and good paper, almost as ancient. This gentleman is a very fine scholar, whom from a child I have known. His tutor was one Florival of Geneva.
April, 1699. Lord Spencer bought an amazing library86 that included, among other rare books, several printed during the early days of that incredible invention, specifically "Tully's Offices, etc." There was a Homer and a Suidas in very good Greek script and quality paper, nearly as old. This gentleman is an excellent scholar, whom I've known since childhood. His tutor was a man named Florival from Geneva.
29th April, 1699. I dined with the Archbishop; but my business was to get him to persuade the King to purchase the late Bishop of Worcester's library, and build a place for his own library at St. James's, in the Park, the present one being too small.
29th April, 1699. I had dinner with the Archbishop; however, my aim was to convince him to persuade the King to buy the late Bishop of Worcester's library and create a space for his own library at St. James's, in the Park, as the current one is too small.
3d May, 1699. At a meeting of the Royal Society I was nominated to be of the committee to wait on the Lord Chancellor to move the King to purchase the Bishop of Worcester's library (Dr. Edward Stillingfleet).
3rd May, 1699. At a meeting of the Royal Society, I was nominated to be on the committee that would approach the Lord Chancellor to persuade the King to purchase the library of the Bishop of Worcester (Dr. Edward Stillingfleet).
4th May, 1699. The Court party have little influence in this Session.
4th May, 1699. The Court party has little influence in this session.
7th May, 1699. The Duke of Ormond restored to his commission. All Lotteries, till now cheating the people, to be no longer permitted than to Christmas, except that for the benefit of Greenwich Hospital. Mr. Bridgman, chairman of the committee for that charitable work, died; a great loss to it. He was Clerk of the Council, a very industrious, useful man. I saw the library of Dr. John Moore,87 Bishop of Norwich, one of the best and most ample collection of all sorts of good books in England, and he, one of the most learned men.
7th May, 1699. The Duke of Ormond has been restored to his position. All lotteries, which have been deceiving the public until now, will only be allowed until Christmas, except for the one benefiting Greenwich Hospital. Mr. Bridgman, the chairman of the committee for that charitable cause, has passed away; this is a significant loss. He was the Clerk of the Council, a very hardworking and valuable man. I saw the library of Dr. John Moore,87 Bishop of Norwich, which is one of the best and most extensive collections of all kinds of good books in England, and he is one of the most knowledgeable individuals.
11th June, 1699. After a long drought, we had a refreshing shower. The day before, there was a dreadful fire at Rotherhithe, near the Thames side, which burned divers ships, and consumed nearly three hundred houses. Now died the famous Duchess of Mazarin; she had been the richest lady in Europe. She was niece of Cardinal Mazarin, and was married to the richest subject in[Pg 346] Europe, as is said. She was born at Rome, educated in France, and was an extraordinary beauty and wit but dissolute and impatient of matrimonial restraint, so as to be abandoned by her husband, and banished, when she came into England for shelter, lived on a pension given her here, and is reported to have hastened her death by intemperate drinking strong spirits. She has written her own story and adventures, and so has her other extravagant sister, wife to the noble family of Colonna.
11th June, 1699. After a long drought, we had a refreshing shower. The day before, there was a terrible fire at Rotherhithe, near the Thames, which burned several ships and destroyed nearly three hundred houses. The famous Duchess of Mazarin has now passed away; she was considered the richest woman in Europe. She was the niece of Cardinal Mazarin and married to the wealthiest man in Europe, or so it's said. Born in Rome and educated in France, she was an extraordinary beauty and had a sharp wit, but she was also reckless and impatient with marital constraints, leading to her abandonment by her husband. When she sought refuge in England, she lived off a pension provided here and is said to have hastened her death by excessively drinking strong spirits. She wrote her own story and adventures, as did her equally extravagant sister, who married into the noble Colonna family.
15th June, 1699. This week died Conyers Seymour, son of Sir Edward Seymour, killed in a duel caused by a slight affront in St. James's Park, given him by one who was envious of his gallantries; for he was a vain, foppish young man, who made a great éclât about town by his splendid equipage and boundless expense. He was about twenty-three years old; his brother, now at Oxford, inherited an estate of £7,000 a year, which had fallen to him not two years before.
15th June, 1699. This week, Conyers Seymour, the son of Sir Edward Seymour, died after being killed in a duel over a minor insult he received in St. James's Park from someone envious of his charm. He was a vain, flashy young man known for making a big splash in town with his luxurious lifestyle and extravagant spending. He was about twenty-three years old; his brother, currently at Oxford, inherited an estate worth £7,000 a year, which had come to him less than two years earlier.
19th June, 1699. My cousin, George Evelyn, of Nutfield, died suddenly.
19th June, 1699. My cousin, George Evelyn, from Nutfield, passed away unexpectedly.
25th June, 1699. The heat has been so great, almost all this month, that I do not remember to have felt much greater in Italy, and this after a winter the wettest, though not the coldest, that I remember for fifty years last past.
25th June, 1699. The heat has been so intense this month that I can't recall feeling anything hotter in Italy, and this comes after a winter that was the wettest I remember in the last fifty years, even if it wasn't the coldest.
28th June, 1699. Finding my occasions called me so often to London, I took the remainder of the lease my son had in a house in Dover Street, to which I now removed, not taking my goods from Wotton.
28th June, 1699. Since my visits to London were becoming more frequent, I decided to take over the rest of the lease on the house my son had in Dover Street, where I moved to without bringing my belongings from Wotton.
23d July, 1699. Seasonable showers, after a continuance of excessive drought and heat.
23rd July, 1699. Timely rain, following a long stretch of intense drought and heat.
August, 1699. I drank the Shooters' Hill waters. At Deptford, they had been building a pretty new church. The Bishop of St. David's [Watson] deprived for simony.88 The city of Moscow burnt by the throwing of squibs.
August, 1699. I drank the waters from Shooters' Hill. At Deptford, they were constructing a beautiful new church. The Bishop of St. David's [Watson] was removed for simony.88 The city of Moscow was set on fire by the tossing of firecrackers.
3d September, 1699. There was in this week an eclipse of the sun, at which many were frightened by the predictions of the astrologers. I remember fifty years ago that many were so terrified by Lilly, that they dared not go out of their houses. A strange earthquake at New Batavia, in the East Indies.[Pg 347]
3rd September, 1699. This week there was a solar eclipse, which frightened many people due to the predictions made by astrologers. I recall that fifty years ago, many were so scared by Lilly that they didn’t even dare to leave their homes. There was also a strange earthquake in New Batavia, in the East Indies.[Pg 347]
4th October, 1699. My worthy brother died at Wotton, in the 83d year of his age, of perfect memory and understanding. He was religious, sober, and temperate, and of so hospitable a nature, that no family in the county maintained that ancient custom of keeping, as it were, open house the whole year in the same manner, or gave more noble or free entertainment to the county on all occasions, so that his house was never free. There were sometimes twenty persons more than his family, and some that stayed there all the summer, to his no small expense; by this he gained the universal love of the county. He was born at Wotton, went from the free school at Guildford to Trinity College, Oxford, thence to the Middle Temple, as gentlemen of the best quality did, but without intention to study the law as a profession. He married the daughter of Colwall, of a worthy and ancient family in Leicestershire, by whom he had one son; she dying in 1643, left George her son an infant, who being educated liberally, after traveling abroad, returned and married one Mrs. Gore, by whom he had several children, but only three daughters survived. He was a young man of good understanding, but, over-indulging his ease and pleasure, grew so very corpulent, contrary to the constitution of the rest of his father's relations, that he died. My brother afterward married a noble and honorable lady, relict of Sir John Cotton, she being an Offley, a worthy and ancient Staffordshire family, by whom he had several children of both sexes. This lady died, leaving only two daughters and a son. The younger daughter died before marriage; the other afterward married Sir Cyril Wych, a noble and learned gentleman (son of Sir —— Wych), who had been Ambassador at Constantinople, and was afterward made one of the Lords Justices of Ireland. Before this marriage, her only brother married the daughter of —— Eversfield, of Sussex, of an honorable family, but left a widow without any child living; he died about 1691, and his wife not many years after, and my brother resettled the whole estate on me. His sister, Wych, had a portion of £6,000, to which was added £300 more; the three other daughters, with what I added, had about £5,000 each. My brother died on the 5th of October, in a good old age and great reputation,[Pg 348] making his beloved daughter, Lady Wych, sole executrix, leaving me only his library and some pictures of my father, mother, etc. She buried him with extraordinary solemnity, rather as a nobleman than as a private gentleman. There were, as I computed, above 2,000 persons at the funeral, all the gentlemen of the county doing him the last honors. I returned to London, till my lady should dispose of herself and family.
4th October, 1699. My dear brother passed away in Wotton at 83 years old, with a clear mind and sound understanding. He was religious, moderate, and self-disciplined, and known for his hospitality. No family in the county kept up the long-standing tradition of always having an open house like he did, or offered more generous and welcoming entertainment on every occasion; his home was always busy. There were often twenty guests besides his own family, some of whom stayed all summer, which was quite costly for him; this earned him the love of the entire county. He was born in Wotton, attended the free school in Guildford, then Trinity College, Oxford, and later the Middle Temple, as gentlemen of his standing often did, though he had no plans to pursue law as a career. He married the daughter of Colwall, from a respected and ancient Leicestershire family, and they had one son together. She passed away in 1643, leaving their son George an infant. George was well-educated, traveled abroad, then returned and married Mrs. Gore, with whom he had several children, but only three daughters survived. He was an intelligent young man, but indulgence in comfort and pleasure made him quite overweight, unlike the rest of his family, leading to his early death. My brother then married a noble and honorable lady, the widow of Sir John Cotton, who was from the Offley family, a respected and ancient family from Staffordshire, and they had several children together. This lady died, leaving behind two daughters and a son. The younger daughter died before marriage; the elder later married Sir Cyril Wych, a distinguished and learned gentleman (who was the son of Sir —— Wych), previously an ambassador in Constantinople and later one of the Lords Justices of Ireland. Before this marriage, her only brother married the daughter of —— Eversfield, from an honorable Sussex family, but sadly left her a widow with no living children. He died around 1691, and his wife followed him not many years later. My brother then transferred the entire estate to me. His sister Wych received a £6,000 dowry, which included an additional £300; the other three daughters, along with what I contributed, each received about £5,000. My brother died on the 5th of October, having lived a long and respected life,[Pg 348] naming his cherished daughter, Lady Wych, as the sole executor of his will, leaving me only his library and some portraits of my father, mother, etc. She buried him with great solemnity, honoring him more as a nobleman than just a private gentleman. I estimated over 2,000 people attended the funeral, with all the gentlemen of the county paying their last respects. I returned to London until my lady decided on her future and the care of her family.
21st October, 1699. After an unusual warm and pleasant season, we were surprised with a very sharp frost. I presented my "Acetaria," dedicated to my Lord Chancellor, who returned me thanks in an extraordinarily civil letter.
21st October, 1699. After an unusually warm and pleasant season, we were taken aback by a very harsh frost. I submitted my "Acetaria," dedicated to my Lord Chancellor, who thanked me in an incredibly polite letter.
15th November, 1699. There happened this week so thick a mist and fog, that people lost their way in the streets, it being so intense that no light of candles, or torches, yielded any (or but very little) direction. I was in it, and in danger. Robberies were committed between the very lights which were fixed between London and Kensington on both sides, and while coaches and travelers were passing. It began about four in the afternoon, and was quite gone by eight, without any wind to disperse it. At the Thames, they beat drums to direct the watermen to make the shore.
15th November, 1699. This week, there was such a thick mist and fog that people lost their way in the streets. It was so dense that the light from candles or torches provided little to no guidance. I experienced it myself and was in danger. Robberies occurred right between the lights that lined the route from London to Kensington on both sides, even while coaches and travelers were passing by. The fog started around four in the afternoon and completely vanished by eight, without any wind to clear it. At the Thames, they beat drums to guide the watermen to the shore.
19th November, 1699. At our chapel in the evening there was a sermon preached by young Mr. Horneck, chaplain to Lord Guilford, whose lady's funeral had been celebrated magnificently the Thursday before. A panegyric was now pronounced, describing the extraordinary piety and excellently employed life of this amiable young lady. She died in childbed a few days before, to the excessive sorrow of her husband, who ordered the preacher to declare that it was on her exemplary life, exhortations and persuasion, that he totally changed the course of his life, which was before in great danger of being perverted; following the mode of this dissolute age. Her devotion, early piety, charity, fastings, economy, disposition of her time in reading, praying, recollections in her own handwriting of what she heard and read, and her conversation were most exemplary.
19th November, 1699. In the evening at our chapel, young Mr. Horneck, the chaplain to Lord Guilford, delivered a sermon. This was after the magnificent funeral of the Lord's wife the Thursday before. He spoke highly of the extraordinary piety and well-lived life of this lovely young woman. She had died recently during childbirth, which caused immense grief for her husband. He asked the preacher to emphasize that it was her exemplary life, along with her encouragement and persuasion, that completely changed his path, which had previously been at risk of moral decay due to the loose ways of this time. Her devotion, early faith, charity, fasting, frugality, how she spent her time reading and praying, her notes on what she heard and read, and her conversations were all truly commendable.
24th November, 1699. I signed Dr. Blackwell's election to be the next year's Boyles Lecturer.
24th November, 1699. I signed Dr. Blackwell's election to be next year's Boyle's Lecturer.
Such horrible robberies and murders were committed, as had not been known in this nation; atheism, profane[Pg 349]ness, blasphemy, among all sorts, portended some judgment if not amended; on which a society was set on foot, who obliged themselves to endeavor the reforming of it, in London and other places, and began to punish offenders and put the laws in more strict execution; which God Almighty prosper! A gentle, calm, dry, temperate weather all this season of the year, but now came sharp, hard frost, and mist, but calm.
Such terrible robberies and murders happened that had never been seen in this country; atheism, profanity, and blasphemy among all kinds signaled some kind of judgment if not corrected. Because of this, a group was formed with the commitment to work on reforming these issues in London and other locations. They began to punish wrongdoers and enforce the laws more strictly. May God Almighty bless this effort! The weather had been mild, calm, and dry for this time of year, but now it turned to sharp, hard frost and mist, though still calm.
3d December, 1699. Calm, bright, and warm as in the middle of April. So continued on 21st of January. A great earthquake in Portugal.
3rd December, 1699. Calm, bright, and warm like in the middle of April. This continued until the 21st of January. A major earthquake struck Portugal.
The Parliament reverses the prodigious donations of the Irish forfeitures, which were intended to be set apart for discharging the vast national debt. They called some great persons in the highest offices in question for setting the Great Seal to the pardon of an arch-pirate,89 who had turned pirate again, and brought prizes into the West Indies, suspected to be connived at on sharing the prey; but the prevailing part in the House called Courtiers, out-voted the complaints, not by being more in number, but by the country party being negligent in attendance.
The Parliament cancels the huge donations from the Irish forfeitures, which were meant to help pay off the massive national debt. They questioned some high-ranking officials for approving the pardon of an arch-pirate,89 who had returned to piracy and brought captured ships to the West Indies, suspected of colluding for a share of the loot. However, the dominant group in the House, known as the Courtiers, outvoted the complaints, not because they had more members, but because the country party was often careless about attending.
14th January, 1699-1700. Dr. Lancaster, Vicar of St. Martin's, dismissed Mr. Stringfellow, who had been made the first preacher at our chapel by the Bishop of Lincoln [Dr. Tenison, now Archbishop], while he held St. Martin's by dispensation, and put in one Mr. Sandys, much against the inclination of those who frequented the chapel. The Scotch book about Darien was burned by the hangman by vote of Parliament.90
14th January, 1699-1700. Dr. Lancaster, the Vicar of St. Martin's, fired Mr. Stringfellow, who had been appointed the first preacher at our chapel by the Bishop of Lincoln [Dr. Tenison, now Archbishop], while he managed St. Martin's by special permission, and replaced him with Mr. Sandys, which was very unpopular among the chapel attendees. The Scottish book about Darien was burned by the hangman following a vote by Parliament.90
21st January, 1700. Died the Duke of Beaufort, a person of great honor, prudence, and estate.
21st January, 1700. The Duke of Beaufort passed away, a man of great honor, wisdom, and wealth.
25th January, 1700. I went to Wotton, the first time after my brother's funeral, to furnish the house with necessaries, Lady Wych and my nephew Glanville, the executors having sold and disposed of what goods were there of my brother's. The weather was now altering into sharp and hard frost.[Pg 350]
25th January, 1700. I went to Wotton for the first time after my brother's funeral to supply the house with essentials, since Lady Wych and my nephew Glanville, the executors, had sold and gotten rid of all my brother's belongings. The weather was changing now, turning into a sharp and hard frost.[Pg 350]
One Stephens, who preached before the House of Commons on King Charles's Martyrdom, told them that the observation of that day was not intended out of any detestation of his murder, but to be a lesson to other Kings and Rulers, how they ought to behave themselves toward their subjects, lest they should come to the same end. This was so resented that, though it was usual to desire these anniversary sermons to be printed, they refused thanks to him, and ordered that in future no one should preach before them, who was not either a Dean or a Doctor of Divinity.
One Stephens, who preached before the House of Commons on King Charles's Martyrdom, told them that observing that day wasn't meant out of any hatred for his murder, but to teach other Kings and Rulers how to conduct themselves toward their subjects, so they wouldn't meet the same fate. This was so unpopular that, even though it was common to request these anniversary sermons be printed, they refused to thank him and decided that in the future, no one would preach before them unless they were either a Dean or a Doctor of Divinity.
4th February, 1700. The Parliament voted against the Scots settling in Darien as being prejudicial to our trade with Spain. They also voted that the exorbitant number of attorneys be lessened (now indeed swarming, and evidently causing lawsuits and disturbance, eating out the estates of the people, provoking them to go to law).
4th February, 1700. The Parliament voted against the Scots settling in Darien, claiming it would hurt our trade with Spain. They also decided that the overwhelming number of attorneys should be reduced (which are now indeed everywhere, clearly causing lawsuits and disturbances, draining the estates of the people, and encouraging them to go to court).
18th February, 1700. Mild and calm season, with gentle frost, and little mizzling rain. The Vicar of St. Martin's frequently preached at Trinity chapel in the afternoon.
18th February, 1700. Mild and calm weather, with a light frost and some drizzling rain. The Vicar of St. Martin's often preached at Trinity chapel in the afternoon.
8th March, 1700. The season was like April for warmth and mildness.—11th. On Wednesday, was a sermon at our chapel, to be continued during Lent.
8th March, 1700. The weather felt like April with its warmth and gentleness.—11th. On Wednesday, there was a sermon at our chapel that will continue during Lent.
13th March, 1700. I was at the funeral of my Lady Temple, who was buried at Islington, brought from Addiscombe, near Croydon. She left my son-in-law Draper (her nephew) the mansion house of Addiscombe, very nobly and completely furnished, with the estate about it, with plate and jewels, to the value in all of about £20,000. She was a very prudent lady, gave many great legacies, with £500 to the poor of Islington, where her husband, Sir Purbeck Temple, was buried, both dying without issue.
13th March, 1700. I attended the funeral of Lady Temple, who was laid to rest in Islington after being brought from Addiscombe, near Croydon. She left my son-in-law Draper (her nephew) the mansion house in Addiscombe, which was very grandly and fully furnished, along with the surrounding estate, silverware, and jewels, all valued at about £20,000. She was a very wise woman and left many significant legacies, including £500 to the poor of Islington, where her husband, Sir Purbeck Temple, was buried; both passed away without children.
24th March, 1700. The season warm, gentle, and exceedingly pleasant. Divers persons of quality entered into the Society for Reformation91 of Manners; and some lectures were set up, particularly in the city of London. The most eminent of the clergy preached at Bow Church, after reading a declaration set forth by the King to suppress the growing wickedness; this began already to take some effect as to common swearing, and oaths in the mouths of people of all ranks.
24th March, 1700. The weather was warm, mild, and very pleasant. Several notable people joined the Society for the Reformation of Manners; and some lectures were established, especially in the city of London. The most prominent clergy spoke at Bow Church, after reading a declaration issued by the King to combat the increasing immorality; this was already starting to make an impact on the common use of swear words and oaths among people of all social classes.
25th March, 1700. Dr. Burnet preached to-day before the Lord Mayor and a very great congregation, on Proverbs xxvii. 5, 6, "Open rebuke is better than secret love; the wounds of a friend are better than the kisses of an enemy." He made a very pathetic discourse concerning the necessity and advantage of friendly correction.
25th March, 1700. Dr. Burnet preached today before the Lord Mayor and a large crowd, based on Proverbs 27:5-6, "Open rebuke is better than secret love; the wounds of a friend are better than the kisses of an enemy." He gave a heartfelt sermon about the importance and benefits of friendly correction.
April, 1700. The Duke of Norfolk now succeeded in obtaining a divorce from his wife by the Parliament for adultery with Sir John Germaine, a Dutch gamester, of mean extraction, who had got much by gaming; the Duke had leave to marry again, so that if he should have children, the Dukedom will go from the late Lord Thomas's children, Papists indeed, but very hopeful and virtuous gentlemen, as was their father. The now Duke their uncle is a Protestant.
April, 1700. The Duke of Norfolk successfully obtained a divorce from his wife through Parliament due to her affair with Sir John Germaine, a Dutch gambler of low status, who had gained a lot from gaming. The Duke was allowed to remarry, which means that if he has children, the Dukedom will pass from the late Lord Thomas's children—who are indeed Catholics but are very promising and virtuous young men, just like their father. The current Duke, their uncle, is a Protestant.
The Parliament nominated fourteen persons to go into Ireland as commissioners to dispose of the forfeited estates there, toward payment of the debts incurred by the late war, but which the King had in great measure given to some of his favorites of both sexes, Dutch and others of little merit, and very unseasonably. That this might be done without suspicion of interest in the Parliament, it was ordered that no member of either House should be in the commission. The great contest between the Lords and Commons concerning the Lords' power of amendments and rejecting bills tacked to the money bill, carried for the Commons. However, this tacking of bills is a novel practice, suffered by King Charles II., who, being continually in want of money, let anything pass rather than not have wherewith to feed his extravagance. This was carried but by one voice in the Lords, all the Bishops following the Court, save one; so that near sixty bills passed, to the great triumph of the Commons and Country party, but high regret of the Court, and those to whom the King had given large estates in Ireland. Pity it is, that things should be brought to this extremity, the government of this nation being so equally poised between King and subject; but we are satisfied with nothing; and, while there is no perfection on this side heaven, methinks both might be contented without straining things too far. Among the rest, there passed a law as to Papists' estates, that if one turned not Protestant before eighteen years of age, it should[Pg 352] pass to his next Protestant heir. This indeed seemed a hard law, but not only the usage of the French King to his Protestant subjects, but the indiscreet insolence of the Papists here, going in triumphant and public processions with their Bishops, with banners and trumpets in divers places (as is said) in the northern counties, has brought it on their party.
The Parliament appointed fourteen people to go to Ireland as commissioners to manage the forfeited estates there, to help pay off the debts from the recent war. However, the King had largely given these estates to some of his favorites, both men and women, from the Netherlands and others of little value, and at a very inappropriate time. To avoid the appearance of self-interest in Parliament, it was decided that no member from either House could be part of the commission. The significant conflict between the Lords and Commons regarding the Lords’ power to amend and reject bills attached to money bills was won by the Commons. However, this practice of attaching bills is something new, permitted by King Charles II, who was always in need of funds and allowed anything to pass rather than not have the means to support his extravagance. This decision was made with only one vote to spare in the Lords, with all but one Bishop siding with the Court. As a result, almost sixty bills were passed, to the great success of the Commons and Country party, but with considerable disappointment from the Court and those to whom the King had granted large estates in Ireland. It is unfortunate that matters have reached such a desperate point, given how the governance of this nation is so evenly balanced between the King and the subjects; yet, we are not satisfied with anything. While perfection is unattainable on this side of heaven, it seems both sides could find contentment without pushing things too far. Among other laws, one was passed concerning Papists' estates that if someone didn’t convert to Protestantism by the age of eighteen, it would[Pg 352] pass to their next Protestant heir. This law seemed harsh, but not only the actions of the French King towards his Protestant subjects but also the reckless arrogance of Papists here, who have gone in public parades with their Bishops, carrying banners and trumpets in various places (as reported) in the northern counties, have led to this outcome for their group.
24th April, 1700. This week there was a great change of State officers. The Duke of Shrewsbury resigned his Lord Chamberlainship to the Earl of Jersey, the Duke's indisposition requiring his retreat. Mr. Vernon, Secretary of State, was put out. The Seal was taken from the Lord Chancellor Somers, though he had been acquitted by a great majority of votes for what was charged against him in the House of Commons. This being in term time, put some stop to business, many eminent lawyers refusing to accept the office, considering the uncertainty of things in this fluctuating conjuncture. It is certain that this Chancellor was a most excellent lawyer, very learned in all polite literature, a superior pen, master of a handsome style, and of easy conversation; but he is said to make too much haste to be rich, as his predecessor, and most in place in this age did, to a more prodigious excess than was ever known. But the Commons had now so mortified the Court party, and property and liberty were so much invaded in all the neighboring kingdoms, that their jealousy made them cautious, and every day strengthened the law which protected the people from tyranny.
April 24, 1700. This week saw a significant reshuffling of government officials. The Duke of Shrewsbury stepped down as Lord Chamberlain, handing the role over to the Earl of Jersey due to the Duke's health issues. Mr. Vernon, the Secretary of State, was removed from his position. The Seal was taken from Lord Chancellor Somers, despite him being acquitted by a large majority in the House of Commons regarding the allegations against him. Since this occurred during the term, it caused a slowdown in business, with many prominent lawyers refusing to accept the position due to the instability of the situation. It is well known that this Chancellor was an outstanding lawyer, highly knowledgeable in all areas of polite literature, a skilled writer, and great conversationalist; however, he is said to be too eager to accumulate wealth, similar to his predecessor and most people in power during this time, to an even greater extent than ever before. However, the Commons had now significantly weakened the Court party, and property and liberty were so heavily threatened in all the neighboring kingdoms that their caution increased, strengthening the laws that protected the people from tyranny each day.
A most glorious spring, with hope of abundance of fruit of all kinds, and a propitious year.
A wonderfully bright spring, filled with the promise of a variety of fruits and a favorable year.
10th May, 1700. The great trial between Sir Walter Clarges and Mr. Sherwin concerning the legitimacy of the late Duke of Albemarle, on which depended an estate of £1,500 a year; the verdict was given for Sir Walter, 19th. Serjeant Wright at last accepted the Great Seal.
10th May, 1700. The major trial between Sir Walter Clarges and Mr. Sherwin regarding the legitimacy of the late Duke of Albemarle, which determined an estate worth £1,500 a year; the verdict was in favor of Sir Walter, 19th. Serjeant Wright finally accepted the Great Seal.
24th May, 1700. I went from Dover street to Wotton, for the rest of the summer, and removed thither the rest of my goods from Sayes Court.
24th May, 1700. I traveled from Dover Street to Wotton for the rest of the summer and moved the remaining items from Sayes Court there.
2d June, 1700. A sweet season, with a mixture of refreshing showers.
2nd June, 1700. A lovely time, with a blend of refreshing rain showers.
9th-16th June, 1700. In the afternoon, our clergy[Pg 353]man had a catechism, which was continued for some time.
9th-16th June, 1700. In the afternoon, our clergy[Pg 353]man held a catechism session, which went on for a while.
July, 1700. I was visited with illness, but it pleased God that I recovered, for which praise be ascribed to him by me, and that he has again so graciously advertised me of my duty to prepare for my latter end, which at my great age, cannot be far off.
July, 1700. I fell ill, but thankfully I recovered, for which I give praise to God. He has graciously reminded me of my duty to prepare for the end of my life, which at my old age, can't be far away.
The Duke of Gloucester, son of the Princess Anne of Denmark, died of the smallpox.
The Duke of Gloucester, the son of Princess Anne of Denmark, died from smallpox.
13th July, 1700. I went to Harden, which was originally a barren warren bought by Sir Robert Clayton, who built there a pretty house, and made such alteration by planting not only an infinite store of the best fruit; but so changed the natural situation of the hill, valleys, and solitary mountains about it, that it rather represented some foreign country, which would produce spontaneously pines, firs, cypress, yew, holly, and juniper; they were come to their perfect growth, with walks, mazes, etc., among them, and were preserved with the utmost care, so that I who had seen it some years before in its naked and barren condition, was in admiration of it. The land was bought of Sir John Evelyn, of Godstone, and was thus improved for pleasure and retirement by the vast charge and industry of this opulent citizen. He and his lady received us with great civility. The tombs in the church at Croydon of Archbishops Grindal, Whitgift, and other Archbishops, are fine and venerable; but none comparable to that of the late Archbishop Sheldon, which, being all of white marble, and of a stately ordinance and carvings, far surpassed the rest, and I judge could not cost less than £700 or £800.
13th July, 1700. I visited Harden, which was initially a barren area purchased by Sir Robert Clayton, who built a lovely house there and transformed the land by planting a vast amount of the best fruit. He altered the natural landscape of the hills, valleys, and lonely mountains around it so much that it looked more like a foreign country that would naturally grow pines, firs, cypress, yew, holly, and juniper. They had all reached their full growth, with paths, mazes, and so on among them, and were maintained with great care. Having seen it a few years earlier in its bare and desolate state, I was truly amazed. The land was purchased from Sir John Evelyn of Godstone, and was developed for enjoyment and seclusion thanks to the considerable expense and effort of this wealthy individual. He and his wife welcomed us very politely. The tombs in Croydon church of Archbishops Grindal, Whitgift, and other Archbishops are impressive and dignified, but none can compare to that of the late Archbishop Sheldon, which, made entirely of white marble and featuring grand design and carvings, far exceeded the others; I estimate it must have cost no less than £700 or £800.
20th September, 1700. I went to Beddington, the ancient seat of the Carews, in my remembrance a noble old structure, capacious, and in form of the buildings of the age of Henry VIII. and Queen Elizabeth, and proper for the old English hospitality, but now decaying with the house itself, heretofore adorned with ample gardens, and the first orange trees92 that had been seen in England, planted in the open ground, and secured in winter only by a tabernacle of boards and stoves removable in summer, that, standing 120 years, large and goodly trees,[Pg 354] and laden with fruit, were now in decay, as well as the grotto, fountains, cabinets, and other curiosities in the house and abroad, it being now fallen to a child under age, and only kept by a servant or two from utter dilapidation. The estate and park about it also in decay.
20th September, 1700. I went to Beddington, the historic home of the Carews, which I remember as a grand old structure, spacious and resembling the buildings from the era of Henry VIII and Queen Elizabeth, fitting for traditional English hospitality. However, it is now falling apart along with the house itself, once adorned with expansive gardens and the first orange trees that had ever been seen in England, planted in the open and protected during winter only by a wooden shelter and stoves that could be removed in summer. These trees, having stood for 120 years, were once large and beautiful, heavy with fruit, but now they too are in decline, just like the grotto, fountains, cabinets, and other curiosities both inside and outside the house. It has now fallen into the hands of a minor and is only being kept from complete ruin by one or two servants. The estate and the surrounding park are also falling into disrepair.
23d September, 1700. I went to visit Mr. Pepys at Clapham, where he has a very noble and wonderfully well-furnished house, especially with Indian and Chinese curiosities. The offices and gardens well accommodated for pleasure and retirement.
23rd September, 1700. I went to visit Mr. Pepys at Clapham, where he has a very impressive and beautifully furnished house, especially filled with Indian and Chinese curiosities. The offices and gardens are well suited for enjoyment and relaxation.
31st October, 1700. My birthday now completed the 80th year of my age. I with my soul render thanks to God, who, of his infinite mercy, not only brought me out of many troubles, but this year restored me to health, after an ague and other infirmities of so great an age; my sight, hearing, and other senses and faculties tolerable, which I implore him to continue, with the pardon of my sins past, and grace to acknowledge by my improvement of his goodness the ensuing year, if it be his pleasure to protract my life, that I may be the better prepared for my last day, through the infinite merits of my blessed Savior, the Lord Jesus, Amen!
31st October, 1700. Today, I completed 80 years of my life. I wholeheartedly thank God, who, in His infinite mercy, not only saved me from many troubles but also restored my health this year after suffering from fevers and other ailments typical for someone my age. My sight, hearing, and other senses are still decent, which I pray He will maintain, along with forgiving my past sins and granting me the grace to improve on His goodness in the coming year if it is His will to extend my life, so I may be better prepared for my final day, through the boundless merits of my blessed Savior, the Lord Jesus. Amen!
5th November, 1700. Came the news of my dear grandson (the only male of my family now remaining) being fallen ill of the smallpox at Oxford, which after the dire effects of it in my family exceedingly afflicted me; but so it pleased my most merciful God that being let blood at his first complaint, and by the extraordinary care of Dr. Mander (Head of the college and now Vice Chancellor), who caused him to be brought and lodged in his own bed and bedchamber, with the advice of his physician and care of his tutor, there were all fair hopes of his recovery, to our infinite comfort. We had a letter every day either from the Vice Chancellor himself, or his tutor.
5th November, 1700. I received the news that my dear grandson (the only male left in my family) has fallen ill with smallpox at Oxford, which deeply troubled me given the severe impact it had on my family in the past. However, it was in the hands of my most merciful God that after being bled for his initial symptoms, and with the exceptional care of Dr. Mander (the Head of the college and now Vice Chancellor), who arranged for him to be moved and accommodated in his own bed and bedroom, along with the guidance of his physician and the attentiveness of his tutor, there was every hope for his recovery, which brought us immense comfort. We received a letter every day either from the Vice Chancellor himself or from his tutor.
17th November, 1700. Assurance of his recovery by a letter from himself.
17th November, 1700. Confirmation of his recovery in a letter from him.
There was a change of great officers at Court. Lord Godolphin returned to his former station of first Commissioner of the Treasury; Sir Charles Hedges, Secretary of State.
There was a change of high-ranking officials at Court. Lord Godolphin returned to his previous position as the first Commissioner of the Treasury, and Sir Charles Hedges took on the role of Secretary of State.
30th November, 1700. At the Royal Society, Lord Somers, the late Chancellor, was continued President.[Pg 355]
30th November, 1700. At the Royal Society, Lord Somers, the former Chancellor, remained President.[Pg 355]
8th December, 1700. Great alterations of officers at Court, and elsewhere,—Lord Chief Justice Treby died; he was a learned man in his profession, of which we have now few, never fewer; the Chancery requiring so little skill in deep law-learning, if the practicer can talk eloquently in that Court; so that probably few care to study the law to any purpose. Lord Marlborough Master of the Ordnance, in place of Lord Romney made Groom of the Stole. The Earl of Rochester goes Lord Lieutenant to Ireland.
8th December, 1700. There are major changes in officials at Court and beyond—Lord Chief Justice Treby passed away; he was a knowledgeable man in his field, and we have fewer and fewer of those now. The Chancery requires so little expertise in complex legal matters, as long as the practitioner can speak persuasively in that Court. Because of this, it seems that not many are inclined to study law meaningfully. Lord Marlborough takes over as Master of the Ordnance, replacing Lord Romney, who has become Groom of the Stole. The Earl of Rochester has been appointed Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.
January, 1700-01. I finished the sale of North Stoake in Sussex to Robert Michell, Esq., appointed by my brother to be sold for payment of portions to my nieces, and other incumbrances on the estate.
January, 1700-01. I completed the sale of North Stoake in Sussex to Robert Michell, Esq., who was designated by my brother to handle the sale for the payment of portions to my nieces, as well as other debts on the estate.
4th January, 1701. An exceeding deep snow, and melted away as suddenly.
4th January, 1701. A very heavy snowfall, which melted away just as quickly.
19th January, 1701. Severe frost, and such a tempest as threw down many chimneys, and did great spoil at sea, and blew down above twenty trees of mine at Wotton.
19th January, 1701. There was a harsh frost and a storm so strong that it knocked down many chimneys, caused a lot of damage at sea, and blew down over twenty of my trees at Wotton.
9th February, 1701. The old Speaker laid aside, and Mr. Harley, an able gentleman, chosen. Our countryman, Sir Richard Onslow, had a party for him.
9th February, 1701. The old Speaker was set aside, and Mr. Harley, a capable gentleman, was chosen. Our fellow countryman, Sir Richard Onslow, organized a party for him.
27th February, 1701. By an order of the House of Commons, I laid before the Speaker the state of what had been received and paid toward the building of Greenwich Hospital.
27th February, 1701. By an order of the House of Commons, I presented to the Speaker the status of what had been received and spent for the construction of Greenwich Hospital.
18th March, 1701. I let Sayes Court to Lord Carmarthen, son to the Duke of Leeds. 28th. I went to the funeral of my sister Draper, who was buried at Edmonton in great state. Dr. Davenant displeased the clergy now met in Convocation by a passage in his book, p. 40.
18th March, 1701. I rented Sayes Court to Lord Carmarthen, son of the Duke of Leeds. On the 28th, I attended the funeral of my sister Draper, who was buried at Edmonton with great ceremony. Dr. Davenant upset the clergy who had gathered in Convocation with a statement in his book, p. 40.
April, 1701. A Dutch boy of about eight or nine years old was carried about by his parents to show, who had about the iris of one eye the letters of Deus meus, and of the other Elohim, in the Hebrew character. How this was done by artifice none could imagine; his parents affirming that he was so born. It did not prejudice his sight, and he seemed to be a lively playing boy. Every[Pg 356]body went to see him; physicians and philosophers examined it with great accuracy; some considered it as artificial, others as almost supernatural.
April, 1701. A Dutch boy around eight or nine years old was brought around by his parents to show off, as he had the words Deus meus in one eye and Elohim in the Hebrew alphabet in the other. No one could figure out how this happened; his parents claimed he was born that way. It didn’t affect his vision, and he appeared to be a lively, playful boy. Everyone came to see him; doctors and philosophers examined him closely; some thought it was artificial, while others considered it nearly supernatural.
4th April, 1701. The Duke of Norfolk died of an apoplexy, and Mr. Thomas Howard of complicated disease since his being cut for the stone; he was one of the Tellers of the Exchequer. Mr. How made a Baron.
4th April, 1701. The Duke of Norfolk died from a stroke, and Mr. Thomas Howard suffered from a complicated illness after having surgery for kidney stones; he was one of the Tellers of the Exchequer. Mr. How was made a Baron.
May, 1701. Some Kentish men, delivering a petition to the House of Commons, were imprisoned.93
May, 1701. Some men from Kent, delivering a petition to the House of Commons, were imprisoned.93
A great dearth, no considerable rain having fallen for some months.
A huge drought, with hardly any rain falling for several months.
17th May, 1701. Very plentiful showers, the wind coming west and south. The Bishops and Convocation at difference concerning the right of calling the assembly and dissolving. Atterbury and Dr. Wake writing one against the other.
17th May, 1701. There were heavy showers, with the wind coming from the west and south. The Bishops and Convocation were at odds over the authority to call and dissolve the assembly. Atterbury and Dr. Wake were writing against each other.
20th June, 1701. The Commons demanded a conference with the Lords on the trial of Lord Somers, which the Lords refused, and proceeding on the trial, the Commons would not attend, and he was acquitted.
20th June, 1701. The Commons requested a meeting with the Lords regarding the trial of Lord Somers, which the Lords denied. As the trial continued without them, the Commons chose not to participate, and he was found not guilty.
22d June, 1701. I went to congratulate the arrival of that worthy and excellent person my Lord Galway, newly come out of Ireland, where he had behaved himself so honestly, and to the exceeding satisfaction of the people: but he was removed thence for being a Frenchman, though they had not a more worthy, valiant, discreet, and trusty person in the two kingdoms, on whom they could have relied for his conduct and fitness. He was one who had deeply suffered, as well as the Marquis, his father, for being Protestants.
22nd June, 1701. I went to congratulate the arrival of that admirable and outstanding person, my Lord Galway, who had just come from Ireland, where he had acted with great integrity and earned the deep respect of the people. However, he was moved from there for being a Frenchman, even though there was no one more worthy, courageous, wise, and reliable in the two kingdoms whom they could have trusted for his leadership and suitability. He was someone who had also suffered greatly, just like his father, the Marquis, for being Protestants.
July, 1701. My Lord Treasurer made my grandson one of the Commissioners of the prizes, salary £500 per annum.
July, 1701. My Lord Treasurer appointed my grandson as one of the Commissioners of the prizes, with a salary of £500 per year.
8th July, 1701. My grandson went to Sir Simon Harcourt, the Solicitor-General, to Windsor, to wait on my Lord Treasurer. There had been for some time a proposal of marrying my grandson to a daughter of[Pg 357] Mrs. Boscawen, sister of my Lord Treasurer, which was now far advanced.
8th July, 1701. My grandson went to see Sir Simon Harcourt, the Solicitor-General, in Windsor to meet with my Lord Treasurer. For some time now, there had been a plan to marry my grandson to a daughter of[Pg 357] Mrs. Boscawen, the sister of my Lord Treasurer, and that was now well underway.
14th July, 1701. I subscribed toward rebuilding Oakwood Chapel, now, after 200 years, almost fallen down.
14th July, 1701. I contributed to the efforts to rebuild Oakwood Chapel, which is now, after 200 years, nearly collapsed.
August, 1701. The weather changed from heat not much less than in Italy or Spain for some few days, to wet, dripping, and cold, with intermissions of fair.
August 1701. The weather shifted from a heat similar to that of Italy or Spain for a few days to wet, dripping, and cold, with occasional breaks of nice weather.
2d September, 1701. I went to Kensington, and saw the house, plantations, and gardens, the work of Mr. Wise, who was there to receive me.
2d September, 1701. I went to Kensington and saw the house, gardens, and landscaping, all done by Mr. Wise, who was there to welcome me.
The death of King James, happening on the 15th of this month, N. S., after two or three days' indisposition, put an end to that unhappy Prince's troubles, after a short and unprosperous reign, indiscreetly attempting to bring in Popery, and make himself absolute, in imitation of the French, hurried on by the impatience of the Jesuits; which the nation would not endure.
The death of King James, which occurred on the 15th of this month, N.S., after he had been unwell for a couple of days, ended the turmoil of that troubled prince, following a brief and unsuccessful reign. He foolishly tried to introduce Catholicism and make himself an absolute ruler, imitating the French, and pushed on by the impatience of the Jesuits, which the nation simply would not accept.
Died the Earl of Bath, whose contest with Lord Montague about the Duke of Albemarle's estate, claiming under a will supposed to have been forged, is said to have been worth £10,000 to the lawyers. His eldest son shot himself a few days after his father's death; for what cause is not clear. He was a most hopeful young man, and had behaved so bravely against the Turks at the siege of Vienna, that the Emperor made him a Count of the Empire. It was falsely reported that Sir Edward Seymour was dead, a great man; he had often been Speaker, Treasurer of the Navy, and in many other lucrative offices. He was of a hasty spirit, not at all sincere, but head of the party at any time prevailing in Parliament.
The Earl of Bath has died, and his dispute with Lord Montague over the Duke of Albemarle's estate, claiming it under a will that is believed to have been forged, is said to have earned lawyers around £10,000. His eldest son took his own life a few days after his father's passing; the reason isn't clear. He was a very promising young man and had fought bravely against the Turks at the siege of Vienna, earning him the title of Count of the Empire from the Emperor. There were false reports of Sir Edward Seymour's death; he was a significant figure who had often been Speaker, Treasurer of the Navy, and held many other well-paying positions. He had a quick temper and was not very sincere, but he led whichever party was in power in Parliament at the time.
29th September, 1701. I kept my first courts in Surrey, which took up the whole week. My steward was Mr. Hervey, a Counsellor, Justice of Peace, and Member of Parliament, and my neighbor. I gave him six guineas, which was a guinea a day, and to Mr. Martin, his clerk, three guineas.
29th September, 1701. I held my first courts in Surrey, which lasted the entire week. My steward was Mr. Hervey, a counselor, Justice of the Peace, and Member of Parliament, who lived nearby. I paid him six guineas, which was a guinea a day, and to Mr. Martin, his clerk, I gave three guineas.
31st October, 1701. I was this day 81 complete, in tolerable health, considering my great age.
31st October, 1701. Today, I turned 81 years old, and I'm in decent health, considering my age.
December, 1701. Great contentions about elections. I gave my vote and interest to Sir R. Onslow and Mr. Weston.
December, 1701. There were intense disputes over the elections. I cast my vote and supported Sir R. Onslow and Mr. Weston.
27th December, 1701. My grandson quitted Oxford.[Pg 358]
27th December, 1701. My grandson left Oxford.[Pg 358]
21st January, 1701-02. At the Royal Society there was read and approved the delineation and description of my Tables of Veins and Arteries, by Mr. Cooper, the chirurgeon, in order to their being engraved.
21st January, 1701-02. At the Royal Society, Mr. Cooper, the surgeon, presented and received approval for the outline and description of my Tables of Veins and Arteries, so that they could be engraved.
8th March, 1702. The King had a fall from his horse, and broke his collar bone, and having been much indisposed before, and aguish, with a long cough and other weakness, died this Sunday morning, about four o'clock.
8th March, 1702. The King fell from his horse and broke his collarbone. He had already been feeling unwell, suffering from chills, a persistent cough, and other weaknesses. He died that Sunday morning around four o'clock.
I carried my accounts of Greenwich Hospital to the Committee.
I took my records of Greenwich Hospital to the Committee.
12th April, 1702. My brother-in-law, Glanville, departed this life this morning after a long languishing illness, leaving a son by my sister, and two granddaughters. Our relation and friendship had been long and great. He was a man of excellent parts. He died in the 84th year of his age, and willed his body to be wrapped in lead and carried down to Greenwich, put on board a ship, and buried in the sea, between Dover and Calais, about the Goodwin sands; which was done on the Tuesday, or Wednesday after. This occasioned much discourse, he having no relation at all to the sea. He was a gentleman of an ancient family in Devonshire, and married my sister Jane. By his prudent parsimony he much improved his fortune. He had a place in the Alienation Office, and might have been an extraordinary man, had he cultivated his parts.
12th April, 1702. My brother-in-law, Glanville, passed away this morning after a long, lingering illness, leaving behind a son from my sister and two granddaughters. Our relationship and friendship had been strong and enduring. He was a man of exceptional qualities. He died at the age of 84 and requested that his body be wrapped in lead, taken to Greenwich, placed on a ship, and buried at sea, between Dover and Calais, near the Goodwin Sands; this was carried out on the Tuesday or Wednesday following his death. This caused quite a bit of discussion, especially since he had no connection to the sea. He came from an old family in Devonshire and was married to my sister Jane. Through his careful spending, he greatly improved his wealth. He held a position in the Alienation Office and had the potential to be an extraordinary man if he had developed his talents.
My steward at Wotton gave a very honest account of what he had laid out on repairs, amounting to £1,900.
My manager at Wotton provided a detailed and truthful report of the £1,900 he spent on repairs.
3d May, 1702. The report of the committee sent to examine the state of Greenwich hospital was delivered to the House of Commons, much to their satisfaction. Lord Godolphin made Lord High Treasurer.
3rd May, 1702. The report from the committee that was sent to look into the condition of Greenwich hospital was presented to the House of Commons, which was very pleased. Lord Godolphin was appointed Lord High Treasurer.
Being elected a member of the Society lately incorporated for the propagation of the Gospel in foreign parts, I subscribed £10 per annum toward the carrying it on. We agreed that every missioner, besides the £20 to set him forth, should have £50 per annum out of the stock of the Corporation, till his settlement was worth to him £100 per annum. We sent a young divine to New York.
Being elected as a member of the newly formed Society for spreading the Gospel in foreign places, I pledged £10 a year to support it. We decided that each missionary, in addition to the £20 for initial expenses, would receive £50 a year from the Corporation's funds until his position was worth £100 a year. We sent a young clergyman to New York.
22d June, 1702. I dined at the Archbishop's with the newly made Bishop of Carlisle, Dr. Nicolson, my worthy and learned correspondent.
22d June, 1702. I had dinner at the Archbishop's with the newly appointed Bishop of Carlisle, Dr. Nicolson, my esteemed and knowledgeable correspondent.
27th June, 1702. I went to Wotton with my family for the rest of the summer, and my son-in-law, Draper,[Pg 359] with his family, came to stay with us, his house at Addiscombe being new-building, so that my family was above thirty. Most of the new Parliament were chosen of Church of England principles, against the peevish party. The Queen was magnificently entertained at Oxford and all the towns she passed through on her way to Bath.
27th June, 1702. I went to Wotton with my family for the rest of the summer, and my son-in-law, Draper,[Pg 359] along with his family, came to stay with us since his house in Addiscombe was still being built, making our group more than thirty. Most of the new Parliament members were chosen based on Church of England beliefs, opposing the irritable faction. The Queen was lavishly entertained in Oxford and in all the towns she visited on her way to Bath.
31st October, 1702. Arrived now to the 82d year of my age, having read over all that passed since this day twelvemonth in these notes, I render solemn thanks to the Lord, imploring the pardon of my past sins, and the assistance of his grace; making new resolutions, and imploring that he will continue his assistance, and prepare me for my blessed Savior's coming, that I may obtain a comfortable departure, after so long a term as has been hitherto indulged me. I find by many infirmities this year (especially nephritic pains) that I much decline; and yet of his infinite mercy retain my intellect and senses in great measure above most of my age. I have this year repaired much of the mansion house and several tenants' houses, and paid some of my debts and engagements. My wife, children, and family in health: for all which I most sincerely beseech Almighty God to accept of these my acknowledgments, and that if it be his holy will to continue me yet longer, it may be to the praise of his infinite grace, and salvation of my soul. Amen!
31st October, 1702. As I reach the 82nd year of my life, having reflected on everything that has happened since this day last year in my notes, I express my heartfelt thanks to the Lord, asking for forgiveness for my past sins and for His grace to assist me; I make new resolutions and pray that He will continue to support me and prepare me for the coming of my blessed Savior, so that I may have a peaceful departure after such a long life. This year, I've noticed many health issues (especially kidney pains) that indicate I'm declining; yet, due to His infinite mercy, I still largely retain my intellect and senses, more so than many others my age. This year, I have made significant repairs to the mansion house and several tenants' homes, and I’ve paid off some of my debts and commitments. My wife, children, and family are healthy; for all of this, I sincerely ask Almighty God to accept my gratitude, and if it is His holy will to allow me to live longer, I pray that it may be for the glory of His infinite grace and the salvation of my soul. Amen!
8th November, 1702. My kinsman, John Evelyn, of Nutfield, a young and very hopeful gentleman, and Member of Parliament, after having come to Wotton to see me, about fifteen days past, went to London and there died of the smallpox. He left a brother, a commander in the army in Holland, to inherit a fair estate.
8th November, 1702. My relative, John Evelyn, from Nutfield, a young and promising gentleman and Member of Parliament, came to visit me at Wotton about fifteen days ago. After that, he went to London and sadly passed away from smallpox. He left behind a brother, a commander in the army in Holland, who will inherit a decent estate.
Our affairs in so prosperous a condition both by sea and land, that there has not been so great an union in Parliament, Court, and people, in memory of man, which God in mercy make us thankful for, and continue! The Bishop of Exeter preached before the Queen and both Houses of Parliament at St. Paul's; they were wonderfully huzzaed in their passage, and splendidly entertained in the city.
Our situation is so successful both by sea and land that there hasn't been such a strong unity in Parliament, the Court, and among the people in living memory. May God, in His mercy, make us grateful for this and keep it going! The Bishop of Exeter preached to the Queen and both Houses of Parliament at St. Paul's; they were cheered enthusiastically during their journey and received lavishly in the city.
December, 1702. The expectation now is, what treasure will be found on breaking bulk of the galleon brought[Pg 360] from Vigo by Sir George Rooke, which being made up in an extraordinary manner in the hold, was not begun to be opened till the fifth of this month, before two of the Privy Council, two of the chief magistrates of the city, and the Lord Treasurer.
December, 1702. Now everyone is curious about what treasure will be discovered when they start unloading the galleon brought[Pg 360] from Vigo by Sir George Rooke. It was stored in a special way in the hold and wasn’t opened until the fifth of this month, in front of two members of the Privy Council, two of the city’s main officials, and the Lord Treasurer.
After the excess of honor conferred by the Queen on the Earl of Marlborough, by making him a Knight of the Garter and a Duke, for the success of but one campaign, that he should desire £5,000 a year to be settled on him by Parliament out of the Post Office, was thought a bold and unadvised request, as he had, besides his own considerable estate, above £30,000 a year in places and employments, with £50,000 at interest. He had married one daughter to the son of my Lord Treasurer Godolphin, another to the Earl of Sunderland, and a third to the Earl of Bridgewater. He is a very handsome person, well-spoken and affable, and supports his want of acquired knowledge by keeping good company.
After the Queen honored the Earl of Marlborough by making him a Knight of the Garter and a Duke for the success of just one campaign, his request for £5,000 a year from Parliament, funded by the Post Office, was viewed as a bold and unreasonable ask. This was especially true considering he already had his own substantial estate, earning over £30,000 a year from various positions and interests, along with £50,000 in investments. He had married one daughter to the son of Lord Treasurer Godolphin, another to the Earl of Sunderland, and a third to the Earl of Bridgewater. He is very good-looking, well-spoken, and friendly, and compensates for his lack of formal education by associating with people of good standing.
January, 1702-03. News of Vice-Admiral Benbow's conflict with the French fleet in the West Indies, in which he gallantly behaved himself, and was wounded, and would have had extraordinary success, had not four of his men-of-war stood spectators without coming to his assistance; for this, two of their commanders were tried by a Council of War, and executed;94 a third was condemned to perpetual imprisonment, loss of pay, and incapacity to serve in future. The fourth died.
January, 1702-03. News about Vice-Admiral Benbow's battle with the French fleet in the West Indies spread, highlighting his bravery and the wounds he suffered. He would have achieved remarkable success, but four of his warships simply watched without providing support. As a result, two of their commanders were tried by a Council of War and executed;94 a third was sentenced to lifelong imprisonment, loss of pay, and disqualification from future service. The fourth died.
Sir Richard Onslow and Mr. Oglethorpe (son of the late Sir Theo. O.) fought on occasion of some words which passed at a committee of the House. Mr. Oglethorpe was disarmed. The Bill against occasional conformity was lost by one vote. Corn and provisions so cheap that the farmers are unable to pay their rents.
Sir Richard Onslow and Mr. Oglethorpe (son of the late Sir Theo. O.) got into a fight over some comments made during a committee meeting in the House. Mr. Oglethorpe was disarmed. The Bill against occasional conformity failed by just one vote. Corn and food are so cheap that farmers can’t afford to pay their rents.
February, 1703. A famous cause at the King's Bench between Mr. Fenwick and his wife, which went for him with a great estate. The Duke of Marlborough lost his only son at Cambridge by the smallpox. A great earthquake at Rome, etc. A famous young woman, an Italian, was hired by our comedians to sing on the stage, dur[Pg 361]ing so many plays, for which they gave her £500; which part by her voice alone at the end of three scenes she performed with such modesty and grace, and above all with such skill, that there was never any who did anything comparable with their voices. She was to go home to the Court of the King of Prussia, and I believe carried with her out of this vain nation above £1,000, everybody coveting to hear her at their private houses.
February, 1703. A well-known legal case at the King's Bench between Mr. Fenwick and his wife, which ended in his favor, granting him a large estate. The Duke of Marlborough lost his only son to smallpox while at Cambridge. There was a major earthquake in Rome, etc. A famous young Italian woman was hired by our actors to sing on stage during many performances, for which they paid her £500; she performed her part with such modesty, grace, and exceptional skill that no one else could compare to her voice. She was set to return to the Court of the King of Prussia, and I believe she took more than £1,000 from this vain nation, as everyone wanted to hear her sing at their private gatherings.
26th May, 1703. This day died Mr. Samuel Pepys, a very worthy, industrious and curious person, none in England exceeding him in knowledge of the navy, in which he had passed through all the most considerable offices, Clerk of the Acts and Secretary of the Admiralty, all which he performed with great integrity. When King James II. went out of England, he laid down his office, and would serve no more; but withdrawing himself from all public affairs, he lived at Clapham with his partner, Mr. Hewer, formerly his clerk, in a very noble house and sweet place, where he enjoyed the fruit of his labors in great prosperity. He was universally beloved, hospitable, generous, learned in many things, skilled in music, a very great cherisher of learned men of whom he had the conversation. His library and collection of other curiosities were of the most considerable, the models of ships especially. Besides what he published of an account of the navy, as he found and left it, he had for divers years under his hand the History of the Navy, or Navalia, as he called it; but how far advanced, and what will follow of his, is left, I suppose, to his sister's son, Mr. Jackson, a young gentleman, whom Mr. Pepys had educated in all sorts of useful learning, sending him to travel abroad, from whence he returned with extraordinary accomplishments, and worthy to be heir. Mr. Pepys had been for near forty years so much my particular friend, that Mr. Jackson sent me complete mourning, desiring me to be one to hold up the pall at his magnificent obsequies; but my indisposition hindered me from doing him this last office.
26th May, 1703. Today, Mr. Samuel Pepys passed away. He was an incredibly admirable, hardworking, and curious individual, unmatched in England for his knowledge of the navy, where he held all the most significant positions, including Clerk of the Acts and Secretary of the Admiralty, and he performed them all with great integrity. When King James II left England, he stepped down from his position and chose to no longer serve; instead, he withdrew from public life and lived in a beautiful house in Clapham with his partner, Mr. Hewer, who had formerly been his clerk, enjoying the rewards of his hard work in prosperity. He was universally loved, hospitable, generous, knowledgeable in many fields, skilled in music, and a great supporter of learned men whom he frequently conversed with. His library and collection of curiosities were impressive, particularly his ship models. In addition to what he published about the navy as he found and left it, he had, for several years, been working on the History of the Navy, or Navalia, as he called it; however, how far along he was and what will become of it is, I believe, left to his sister's son, Mr. Jackson, a young man whom Mr. Pepys educated in all kinds of useful knowledge, even sending him abroad to travel, and he returned with remarkable skills, making him a worthy heir. For nearly forty years, Mr. Pepys was a close friend of mine, and Mr. Jackson sent me a full set of mourning clothes, requesting me to help carry the pall at his grand funeral; however, I was unable to fulfill this final duty due to my illness.
13th June, 1703. Rains have been great and continual, and now, near midsummer, cold and wet.
13th June, 1703. The rains have been heavy and ongoing, and now, close to midsummer, it's cold and damp.
11th July, 1703. I went to Addiscombe, sixteen miles from Wotton, to see my son-in-law's new house, the outside, to the coving, being such excellent brickwork,[Pg 362] based with Portland stone, with the pilasters, windows, and within, that I pronounced it in all the points of good and solid architecture to be one of the very best gentlemen's houses in Surrey, when finished. I returned to Wotton in the evening, though weary.
11th July, 1703. I went to Addiscombe, sixteen miles from Wotton, to see my son-in-law's new house. The exterior, right up to the coving, was such excellent brickwork,[Pg 362] made with Portland stone, along with the pilasters and windows. Inside, I declared it to be one of the best gentleman's houses in Surrey in terms of solid architecture when finished. I returned to Wotton in the evening, though I was tired.
25th July, 1703. The last week in this month an uncommon long-continued rain, and the Sunday following, thunder and lightning.
25th July, 1703. The last week of this month saw an unusually long and steady rain, and on the following Sunday, there was thunder and lightning.
12th August, 1703. The new Commission for Greenwich hospital was sealed and opened, at which my son-in-law, Draper, was present, to whom I resigned my office of Treasurer. From August 1696, there had been expended in building £89,364 14s. 8d.
12th August, 1703. The new Commission for Greenwich hospital was sealed and opened, and my son-in-law, Draper, was there when I handed over my role as Treasurer. From August 1696, a total of £89,364 14s. 8d. had been spent on construction.
31st October, 1703. This day, being eighty-three years of age, upon examining what concerned me, more particularly the past year, with the great mercies of God preserving me, and in the same measure making my infirmities tolerable, I gave God most hearty and humble thanks, beseeching him to confirm to me the pardon of my sins past, and to prepare me for a better life by the virtue of his grace and mercy, for the sake of my blessed Savior.
31st October, 1703. Today, at eighty-three years old, reflecting on my life, especially the past year, I am grateful for God's great mercies in keeping me safe and making my weaknesses bearable. I offered my heartfelt and humble thanks to God, asking Him to assure me of forgiveness for my past sins and to help me lead a better life through His grace and mercy, for the sake of my blessed Savior.
21st November, 1703. The wet and uncomfortable weather staying us from church this morning, our Doctor officiated in my family; at which were present above twenty domestics. He made an excellent discourse on 1 Cor. xv., v. 55, 56, of the vanity of this world and uncertainty of life, and the inexpressible happiness and satisfaction of a holy life, with pertinent inferences to prepare us for death and a future state. I gave him thanks, and told him I took it kindly as my funeral sermon.
21st November, 1703. The rainy and uncomfortable weather kept us from church this morning, so our Doctor led the service in my home; over twenty staff members were present. He delivered an excellent sermon on 1 Cor. xv., v. 55, 56, discussing the emptiness of this world and the unpredictability of life, along with the unmatched joy and fulfillment of living a righteous life, making relevant points to prepare us for death and what comes next. I thanked him and mentioned that I appreciated it as my funeral sermon.
26-7th November, 1703. The effects of the hurricane and tempest of wind, rain, and lightning, through all the nation, especially London, were very dismal. Many houses demolished, and people killed. As to my own losses, the subversion of woods and timber, both ornamental and valuable, through my whole estate, and about my house the woods crowning the garden mount, the growing along the park meadow, the damage to my own dwelling, farms, and outhouses, is almost tragical, not to be paralleled, with anything happening in our age. I am not able to describe it; but submit to the pleasure of Almighty God.[Pg 363]
26-7th November, 1703. The impact of the hurricane and the fierce winds, rain, and lightning across the country, especially in London, was really devastating. Many houses were destroyed, and people lost their lives. As for my own losses, the destruction of my trees and timber, both ornamental and valuable, throughout my estate, including the woods surrounding the garden and those along the park meadow, the damage to my home, farms, and outbuildings is almost tragic, unmatched by anything we've seen in our time. I can hardly express it, but I accept the will of Almighty God.[Pg 363]
7th December, 1703. I removed to Dover Street, where I found all well; but houses, trees, garden, etc., at Sayes Court, suffered very much.
7th December, 1703. I moved to Dover Street, where I found everything well; however, the houses, trees, garden, etc., at Sayes Court, were greatly damaged.
31st December, 1703. I made up my accounts, paid wages, gave rewards and New Year's gifts, according to custom.
31st December, 1703. I settled my accounts, paid wages, and handed out bonuses and New Year's gifts, as was customary.
January, 1703-04. The King of Spain95 landing at Portsmouth, came to Windsor, where he was magnificently entertained by the Queen, and behaved himself so nobly, that everybody was taken with his graceful deportment. After two days, having presented the great ladies, and others, with valuable jewels, he went back to Portsmouth, and immediately embarked for Spain.
January, 1703-04. The King of Spain95 arrived at Portsmouth, then traveled to Windsor, where the Queen hosted him with great hospitality. His noble behavior impressed everyone, and they admired his graceful manner. After two days, he gifted the important ladies and others with valuable jewels, then returned to Portsmouth and quickly boarded a ship back to Spain.
16th January, 1704. The Lord Treasurer gave my grandson the office of Treasurer of the Stamp Duties, with a salary of £300 a year.
16th January, 1704. The Lord Treasurer appointed my grandson as the Treasurer of the Stamp Duties, with an annual salary of £300.
30th January, 1704. The fast on the Martyrdom of King Charles I. was observed with more than usual solemnity.
30th January, 1704. The fast for the Martyrdom of King Charles I was observed with more than usual solemnity.
May, 1704. Dr. Bathurst, President of Trinity College, Oxford, now died,96 I think the oldest acquaintance now left me in the world. He was eighty-six years of age, stark blind, deaf, and memory lost, after having been a person of admirable parts and learning. This is a serious alarm to me. God grant that I may profit by it! He built a very handsome chapel to the college, and his own tomb. He gave a legacy of money, and a third part of his library, to his nephew, Dr. Bohun, who went hence to his funeral.
May, 1704. Dr. Bathurst, President of Trinity College, Oxford, has now passed away, 96 I believe he was the oldest friend I had left in the world. He was eighty-six years old, completely blind, deaf, and lost his memory, after having been a person of remarkable talent and knowledge. This is a serious wake-up call for me. God help me to learn from it! He built a beautiful chapel for the college and his own tomb. He left a sum of money and a third of his library to his nephew, Dr. Bohun, who attended his funeral.
7th September, 1704. This day was celebrated the thanksgiving for the late great victory,97 with the utmost pomp and splendor by the Queen, Court, great Officers, Lords Mayor, Sheriffs, Companies, etc. The streets were scaffolded from Temple Bar, where the Lord Mayor presented her Majesty with a sword, which she returned. Every company was ranged under its banners, the city militia without the rails, which were all hung with cloth suitable[Pg 364] to the color of the banner. The Lord Mayor, Sheriffs, and Aldermen were in their scarlet robes, with caparisoned horses; the Knight Marshal on horseback; the Foot-Guards; the Queen in a rich coach with eight horses, none with her but the Duchess of Marlborough in a very plain garment, the Queen full of jewels. Music and trumpets at every city company. The great officers of the Crown, Nobility, and Bishops, all in coaches with six horses, besides innumerable servants, went to St. Paul's, where the Dean preached. After this, the Queen went back in the same order to St. James's. The city companies feasted all the Nobility and Bishops, and illuminated at night. Music for the church and anthems composed by the best masters. The day before was wet and stormy, but this was one of the most serene and calm days that had been all the year.
7th September, 1704. Today, the thanksgiving for the recent great victory was celebrated with utmost pomp and splendor by the Queen, the Court, high-ranking officials, Lords Mayor, Sheriffs, Companies, and others. The streets were scaffolded from Temple Bar, where the Lord Mayor presented her Majesty with a sword, which she returned. Each company was assembled under its banners, and the city militia was outside the barriers, which were all draped in fabric matching the color of the banners. The Lord Mayor, Sheriffs, and Aldermen wore their scarlet robes, riding on decorated horses; the Knight Marshal was on horseback; the Foot Guards were present; and the Queen traveled in an ornate coach pulled by eight horses, accompanied only by the Duchess of Marlborough in a modest outfit, while the Queen was adorned with jewels. Music and trumpets sounded from each city company. The high-ranking officials of the Crown, Nobility, and Bishops were all in coaches pulled by six horses, alongside countless servants, as they made their way to St. Paul's, where the Dean delivered a sermon. After this, the Queen returned in the same procession to St. James's. The city companies hosted a feast for all the Nobility and Bishops, and the city was illuminated at night. There was music for the church and anthems composed by the finest masters. The day before had been wet and stormy, but today was one of the most serene and calm days of the entire year.
October, 1704. The year has been very plentiful.
October, 1704. This year has been very abundant.
31st October, 1704. Being my birthday and the 84th year of my life, after particular reflections on my concerns and passages of the year, I set some considerable time of this day apart, to recollect and examine my state and condition, giving God thanks, and acknowledging his infinite mercies to me and mine, begging his blessing, and imploring his protection for the year following.
31st October, 1704. It was my birthday and I turned 84. After thinking about my concerns and experiences of the past year, I dedicated a good portion of the day to reflect on my situation, thanking God and recognizing his endless kindness towards me and my family, asking for his blessing, and seeking his protection for the coming year.
December, 1704. Lord Clarendon presented me with the three volumes of his father's "History of the Rebellion."
December, 1704. Lord Clarendon gave me the three volumes of his father's "History of the Rebellion."
My Lord of Canterbury wrote to me for suffrage for Mr. Clarke's continuance this year in the Boyle Lecture, which I willingly gave for his excellent performance of this year.
My Lord of Canterbury wrote to me asking for support for Mr. Clarke to continue in the Boyle Lecture this year, which I happily provided because of his outstanding performance this year.
9th February, 1704. I went to wait on my Lord Treasurer, where was the victorious Duke of Marlborough, who came to me and took me by the hand with extraordinary familiarity and civility, as formerly he was used to do, without any alteration of his good-nature. He had a most rich George in a sardonyx set with diamonds of very great value; for the rest, very plain. I had not seen him for some years, and believed he might have forgotten me.
9th February, 1704. I went to meet my Lord Treasurer, where the victorious Duke of Marlborough was present. He approached me and took my hand with an unusual warmth and politeness, just like he used to, showing no change in his kind nature. He was wearing an incredibly valuable George made of sardonyx and set with very precious diamonds; the rest of his attire was quite simple. It had been several years since I last saw him, and I thought he might have forgotten about me.
21st February, 1704. Remarkable fine weather. Agues and smallpox much in every place.
21st February, 1704. Remarkably nice weather. Fevers and smallpox widespread everywhere.
11th March, 1704. An exceedingly dry season. Great[Pg 365] loss by fire, burning the outhouses and famous stable of the Earl of Nottingham, at Burleigh [Rutlandshire], full of rich goods and furniture, by the carelessness of a servant. A little before, the same happened at Lord Pembroke's, at Wilton. The old Countess of Northumberland, Dowager of Algernon Percy, Admiral of the fleet to King Charles I., died in the 83d year of her age. She was sister to the Earl of Suffolk, and left a great estate, her jointure to descend to the Duke of Somerset.
11th March, 1704. An extremely dry season. Significant[Pg 365] loss from a fire, which destroyed the outbuildings and the famous stable of the Earl of Nottingham at Burleigh [Rutlandshire], filled with valuable goods and furniture, due to a servant's carelessness. Shortly before this, the same occurred at Lord Pembroke's estate at Wilton. The elderly Countess of Northumberland, widow of Algernon Percy, Admiral of the fleet under King Charles I, passed away at the age of 83. She was the sister of the Earl of Suffolk and left behind a substantial estate, her jointure to be inherited by the Duke of Somerset.
May, 1704. The Bailiff of Westminster hanged himself. He had an ill report.
May, 1704. The Bailiff of Westminster took his own life. He had a bad reputation.
On the death of the Emperor, there was no mourning worn at Court, because there was none at the Imperial Court on the death of King William.
On the Emperor's death, there was no mourning observed at Court, since there had been none at the Imperial Court for King William's death.
18th May, 1704. I went to see Sir John Chardin, at Turnham Green, the gardens being very fine, and exceedingly well planted with fruit.
18th May, 1704. I went to visit Sir John Chardin at Turnham Green, where the gardens were really beautiful and very well planted with fruit.
20th May, 1704. Most extravagant expense to debauch and corrupt votes for Parliament members. I sent my grandson with his party of my freeholders to vote for Mr. Harvey, of Combe.
20th May, 1704. A lavish spending spree to buy and corrupt votes for Parliament members. I sent my grandson with his group of freeholders to vote for Mr. Harvey, of Combe.
4th January, 1704-05. I dined at Lambeth with the Archbishop of Dublin, Dr. King, a sharp and ready man in politics, as well as very learned.
4th January, 1704-05. I had dinner at Lambeth with the Archbishop of Dublin, Dr. King, who is a clever and quick-witted man in politics, as well as very knowledgeable.
June, 1705. The season very dry and hot. I went to see Dr. Dickinson the famous chemist. We had long conversation about the philosopher's elixir, which he believed attainable, and had seen projection himself by one who went under the name of Mundanus, who sometimes came along among the adepts, but was unknown as to his country, or abode; of this the doctor had written a treatise in Latin, full of very astonishing relations. He is a very learned person, formerly a Fellow of St. John's College, Oxford, in which city he practiced physic, but has now altogether given it over, and lives retired, being very old and infirm, yet continuing chemistry.
June, 1705. It was a very dry and hot season. I went to see Dr. Dickinson, the famous chemist. We had a long conversation about the philosopher's elixir, which he believed was attainable, and he had seen it projected himself by someone who went by the name of Mundanus, who sometimes mingled with the adepts but was unknown in terms of his country or residence; the doctor had written a treatise in Latin about this, full of remarkable accounts. He is a highly knowledgeable person, formerly a Fellow of St. John's College, Oxford, where he practiced medicine, but he has now completely retired from that and lives a secluded life, being very old and frail, yet still active in chemistry.
I went to Greenwich hospital, where they now began to take in wounded and worn-out seamen, who are exceedingly well provided for. The buildings now going on are very magnificent.
I went to Greenwich Hospital, where they have now started taking in injured and exhausted sailors, who are very well cared for. The buildings currently under construction are quite impressive.
October, 1705. Mr. Cowper made Lord Keeper. Observing how uncertain great officers are of continuing long in their places, he would not accept it, unless[Pg 366] £2,000 a year were given him in reversion when he was put out, in consideration of his loss of practice. His predecessors, how little time soever they had the Seal, usually got £100,000 and made themselves Barons. A new Secretary of State. Lord Abington, Lieutenant of the Tower, displaced, and General Churchill, brother to the Duke of Marlborough, put in. An indication of great unsteadiness somewhere, but thus the crafty Whig party (as called) begin to change the face of the Court, in opposition to the High Churchmen, which was another distinction of a party from the Low Churchmen. The Parliament chose one Mr. Smith, Speaker. There had never been so great an assembly of members on the first day of sitting, being more than 450. The votes both of the old, as well as the new, fell to those called Low Churchmen, contrary to all expectation.
October, 1705. Mr. Cowper appointed as Lord Keeper. Noticing how uncertain it is for high-ranking officials to stay in their positions for long, he would not accept the role unless[Pg 366] he received £2,000 a year guaranteed to him once he was removed, considering his loss of practice. His predecessors, no matter how brief their term with the Seal, typically received £100,000 and became Barons. A new Secretary of State was appointed. Lord Abington, the Lieutenant of the Tower, was displaced, and General Churchill, brother of the Duke of Marlborough, took his place. This shows significant instability somewhere
31st October, 1705. I am this day arrived to the 85th year of my age. Lord teach me so to number my days to come, that I may apply them to wisdom!
31st October, 1705. Today I celebrate my 85th birthday. Lord, help me to make the most of the time I have left, so I can gain wisdom!
1st January, 1705-06. Making up my accounts for the past year, paid bills, wages, and New Year's gifts, according to custom. Though much indisposed and in so advanced a stage, I went to our chapel [in London] to give God public thanks, beseeching Almighty God to assist me and my family the ensuing year, if he should yet continue my pilgrimage here, and bring me at last to a better life with him in his heavenly kingdom. Divers of our friends and relations dined with us this day.
1st January, 1705-06. I was settling my accounts for the past year: paying bills, wages, and New Year's gifts as is customary. Although I was feeling quite unwell and in a later stage of my life, I still went to our chapel [in London] to publicly thank God, asking the Almighty to help me and my family in the coming year, if He allows me to continue my journey here, and to finally bring me to a better life with Him in His heavenly kingdom. Several friends and family members joined us for dinner today.
27th January, 1706. My indisposition increasing, I was exceedingly ill this whole week.
27th January, 1706. As my health worsened, I was really sick all week.
3d February, 1706. Notes of the sermons at the chapel in the morning and afternoon, written with his own hand, conclude this Diary.98
3rd February, 1706. Notes of the sermons at the chapel in the morning and afternoon, written by him, conclude this Diary.98
END OF THE DIARY.
DIARY ENTRIES COMPLETE.
FOOTNOTES:
2 Mr. Lowman.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Mr. Lowman.
4 Cornelius Van Drebbell, born at Alkmaar, in Holland, in 1572; but in the reign of Charles I. settled in London, where he died in 1634. He was famous for other discoveries in science besides that mentioned by Evelyn—the most important of which was the thermometer. He also made improvements in microscopes and telescopes; and though, like many of his scientific contemporaries, something of an empiric, possessed a considerable knowledge of chemistry and of different branches of natural philosophy.
4 Cornelius Van Drebbell was born in Alkmaar, Holland, in 1572. During the reign of Charles I, he moved to London, where he died in 1634. He was known for various scientific discoveries beyond the one noted by Evelyn, the most significant being the thermometer. He also made enhancements to microscopes and telescopes. Although, like many of his scientific peers, he was somewhat of an empiricist, he had a substantial understanding of chemistry and different areas of natural philosophy.
5 The Fumifugium.
7 Among the principal offenders here aimed at were Mrs. Margaret Hughes, Mrs. Eleanor Gwynne, Mrs. Davenport, Mrs. Uphill, Mrs. Davis, and Mrs. Knight. Mrs. Davenport (Roxolana) was "my Lord Oxford's Miss;" Mrs. Uphill was the actress alluded to in connection with Sir R. Howard; Mrs. Hughes ensnared Prince Rupert; and the last of the "misses" referred to by Evelyn was Nell Gwynne.
7 Among the main culprits mentioned here were Mrs. Margaret Hughes, Mrs. Eleanor Gwynne, Mrs. Davenport, Mrs. Uphill, Mrs. Davis, and Mrs. Knight. Mrs. Davenport (Roxolana) was "my Lord Oxford's Miss;" Mrs. Uphill was the actress mentioned in relation to Sir R. Howard; Mrs. Hughes caught the attention of Prince Rupert; and the last of the "misses" mentioned by Evelyn was Nell Gwynne.
8 In illustration of the garb which succeeded the "long coats" out of which lads of twelve or thirteen were thus suffered to emerge, it may be mentioned that there hung, some years ago, and perhaps may hang still, upon the walls of the Swan Inn at Leatherhead in Surrey, a picture of four children, dates of birth between 1640 and 1650, of whom a lad of about the age of young Evelyn is represented in a coat reaching to his ankles.
8 To illustrate the clothing that replaced the "long coats" that boys aged twelve or thirteen were allowed to wear, it's worth mentioning that, some years ago, and maybe still today, there was a picture hanging on the walls of the Swan Inn at Leatherhead in Surrey. It depicted four children born between 1640 and 1650, with one boy, about the age of young Evelyn, shown wearing a coat that reached his ankles.
9 Reprinted in "Miscellaneous Writings," pp. 501-509. In a letter to Cowley, 12th March, 1666, Evelyn apologises for having written against that life which he had joined with Mr. Cowley in so much admiring, assuring him he neither was nor could be serious in avowing such a preference.
9 Reprinted in "Miscellaneous Writings," pp. 501-509. In a letter to Cowley on March 12, 1666, Evelyn apologizes for having spoken out against the lifestyle he once admired alongside Mr. Cowley, assuring him that he was never serious in expressing such a preference.
10 The Virgin Queen which Evelyn saw was Dryden's Maiden Queen. Pepys saw it on the night of its first production (twelve days before Evelyn's visit); and was charmed by Nell Gwynne's Florimell. "So great a performance of a comical part was never, I believe, in the world before."
10 The Queen who never married that Evelyn saw was Dryden's Queen of Maidens. Pepys saw it on the night of its first performance (twelve days before Evelyn's visit); and he was taken by Nell Gwynne's portrayal of Florimell. "I don’t think there’s ever been such an amazing performance of a comedic role before."
11 "The Parliament giving but weak supplies for the war, the King, to save charges, is persuaded by the Chancellor, the Lord Treasurer, Southampton, the Duke of Albemarle, and the other ministers, to lay up the first and second-rate ships, and make only a defensive war in the next campaign. The Duke of York opposed this, but was overruled." Life of King James II., vol. i., p. 425.
11 "Since Parliament is providing little support for the war, the King, in an effort to cut costs, is convinced by the Chancellor, the Lord Treasurer, Southampton, the Duke of Albemarle, and the other advisors to dock the first and second-rate ships and focus solely on defensive actions in the upcoming campaign. The Duke of York disagreed, but his objections were dismissed." Life of King James II., vol. i., p. 425.
12 Since done. Evelyn's note.
Since done. Evelyn's note.
13 This entry of the 9th December, 1667, is a mistake. Evelyn could not have visited the "late Lord Chancellor" on that day. Lord Clarendon fled on Saturday, the 29th of November, 1667, and his letter resigning the Chancellorship of the University of Oxford is dated from Calais on the 7th of December. That Evelyn's book is not, in every respect, strictly a diary, is shown by this and several similar passages already adverted to in the remarks prefixed to the present edition. If the entry of the 18th of August, 1683, is correct, the date of Evelyn's last visit to Lord Clarendon was the 28th of November, 1667.
13 The entry from December 9, 1667, is incorrect. Evelyn could not have visited the "recently retired Lord Chancellor" on that day. Lord Clarendon fled on Saturday, November 29, 1667, and his letter resigning the Chancellorship of the University of Oxford was dated from Calais on December 7. The fact that Evelyn's book isn't strictly a diary in every way is demonstrated by this and several similar passages mentioned in the comments at the beginning of this edition. If the entry from August 18, 1683, is accurate, then Evelyn's last visit to Lord Clarendon was on November 28, 1667.
15 Reprinted in Evelyn's "Miscellaneous Writings."
17 Evelyn subjoins in a note: "When there was a project, 1669, for getting a divorce for the King, to facilitate it there was brought into the House of Lords a bill for dissolving the marriage of Lord Ross, on account of adultery, and to give him leave to marry again. This Bill, after great debates, passed by the plurality of only two votes, and that by the great industry of the Lord's friends, as well as the Duke's enemies, who carried it on chiefly in hopes it might be a precedent and inducement for the King to enter the more easily into their late proposals; nor were they a little encouraged therein, when they saw the King countenance and drive on the Bill in Lord Ross's favor. Of eighteen bishops that were in the House, only two voted for the bill, of which one voted through age, and one was reputed Socinian." The two bishops favorable to the bill were Dr. Cosin, Bishop of Durham, and Dr. Wilkins, Bishop of Chester.
17 Evelyn adds in a note: "In 1669, there was a plan to get a divorce for the King. To support this, a bill was introduced in the House of Lords to dissolve Lord Ross's marriage due to adultery and allow him to remarry. After intense debates, the bill passed by just two votes, thanks to the efforts of Lord Ross's supporters and the Duke's opponents, who mainly hoped this would set a precedent and encourage the King to consider their recent proposals more favorably. They were somewhat encouraged when they noticed the King backing and promoting the bill in favor of Lord Ross. Out of eighteen bishops present in the House, only two voted for the bill: one due to being old, and the other was thought to be Socinian." The two bishops who supported the bill were Dr. Cosin, Bishop of Durham, and Dr. Wilkins, Bishop of Chester.
18 Sir William Howard, created in November, 1640, Viscount Stafford. In 1678, he was accused of complicity with the Popish Plot, and upon trial by his Peers in Westminster Hall, was found guilty, by a majority of twenty-four. He was beheaded, December 29, 1680, on Tower Hill.
18 Sir William Howard was made Viscount Stafford in November 1640. In 1678, he was accused of being involved in the Popish Plot, and during his trial by his peers in Westminster Hall, he was found guilty by a margin of twenty-four votes. He was executed by beheading on December 29, 1680, at Tower Hill.
19 Balthasar de Monconys, a Frenchman, celebrated for his travels in the East, which he published in three volumes. His object was to discover vestiges of the philosophy of Trismegistus and Zoroaster; in which, it is hardly necessary to add, he was not very successful.
19 Balthasar de Monconys, a Frenchman known for his travels in the East, published his findings in three volumes. His goal was to uncover traces of the philosophy of Trismegistus and Zoroaster; however, it’s worth noting that he wasn't very successful in this endeavor.
21 Henrietta, the King's sister, married to Philip, Duke of Orleans, was then on a visit here. Madame Querouaille came over in her train, on purpose to entice Charles into an union with Louis XIV.; a design which unhappily succeeded but too well. She became the King's mistress, was made Duchess of Portsmouth, and was his favorite till his death.
21 Henrietta, the King's sister, who was married to Philip, Duke of Orleans, was visiting here at the time. Madame Querouaille accompanied her, intending to persuade Charles to align himself with Louis XIV.; a plan that unfortunately worked all too well. She became the King's mistress, was made Duchess of Portsmouth, and remained his favorite until his death.
22 Better known by the name of Grinling Gibbon; celebrated for his exquisite carving. Some of his most astonishing work is at Chatsworth and at Petworth.
22 Better known as Grinling Gibbon, he is famous for his amazing carvings. Some of his most remarkable work can be found at Chatsworth and Petworth.
25 Nell Gwynne: there can be no doubt as to the name with which we are to fill up these blanks. This familiar interview of Nelly and the King has afforded a subject for painters.
25 Nell Gwynne: there’s no question about the name we’re going to fill in here. This well-known meeting between Nelly and the King has inspired many artists.
26 This entry of 10th May, 1671, so far as it relates to Blood, and the stealing of the crown, etc., is a mistake. Blood stole the crown on the 9th of May, 1671—the very day before; and the "not long before" of Evelyn, and the circumstance of his being "pardoned," which Evelyn also mentions, can hardly be said to relate to only the day before.
26 This entry from May 10, 1671, regarding Blood and the theft of the crown, etc., is incorrect. Blood actually stole the crown on May 9, 1671—the very day prior; and the "not long before" comment from Evelyn, along with the detail about his being "pardoned," which Evelyn also notes, can hardly only pertain to the day before.
27 Sir Matthew Hale, so famous as one of the justices of the bench in Cromwell's time. After the Restoration, he became Chief Baron of the Exchequer; then Chief Justice of the King's Bench, and died in 1676. The author of numerous works, not only on professional subjects, but on mathematics and philosophy.
27 Sir Matthew Hale, well-known as one of the judges during Cromwell's era. After the Restoration, he became Chief Baron of the Exchequer, then Chief Justice of the King's Bench, and passed away in 1676. He wrote many works, not just on legal topics, but also on mathematics and philosophy.
28 He died in 1687, at the great age of 90 years and 6 months. Constantine and his son, Christian Huygens, were both eminent for scientific knowledge and classical attainments; Christian, particularly so; for he was the inventor of the pendulum, made an improvement in the air-pump, first discovered the ring and one of the satellites of Saturn, and ascertained the laws of collision of elastic bodies. He died in 1695. Constantine, the father, was a person of influence and distinction in Holland, and held the post of secretary to the Prince of Orange.
28 He died in 1687, at the impressive age of 90 years and 6 months. Constantine and his son, Christian Huygens, were both notable for their scientific knowledge and classical education; Christian, especially so, as he invented the pendulum, improved the air pump, discovered the ring and one of Saturn's moons, and figured out the laws of collision for elastic bodies. He died in 1695. Constantine, the father, was a prominent and respected figure in Holland, serving as the secretary to the Prince of Orange.
31 Mrs. Blagg whom Evelyn never tires of instancing and characterizing as a rare example of piety and virtue, in so rare a wit, beauty, and perfection, in a licentious court, and depraved age. She was afterward married to Mr. Godolphin, and her life, written by Evelyn, has been edited and published by the Bishop of Oxford.
31 Mrs. Blagg, whom Evelyn always highlights and describes as a remarkable example of faith and goodness, with such unique intelligence, beauty, and excellence, in a morally corrupt court and depraved era. She later married Mr. Godolphin, and her life, as penned by Evelyn, has been edited and published by the Bishop of Oxford.
35 Lady Catherine Stuart, sister and heir to Charles Stuart, Duke of Richmond and Lennox, the husband of Mrs. Frances Stuart, one of the most admired beauties of the Court, with whom Charles II. was so deeply in love that he never forgave the Duke for marrying her, having already, it is thought, formed some similar intention himself. He took the first opportunity of sending the Duke into an honorable exile, as Ambassador to Denmark, where he shortly after died, leaving no issue by the Duchess.
35 Lady Catherine Stuart, sister and heir to Charles Stuart, Duke of Richmond and Lennox, was the wife of Mrs. Frances Stuart, one of the most admired beauties at Court. Charles II. was so deeply in love with her that he never forgave the Duke for marrying her, as he had already been rumored to have similar intentions himself. He quickly found a way to send the Duke into honorable exile as Ambassador to Denmark, where he soon died, leaving no children with the Duchess.
36 Now the British Museum.
Now the British Museum.
37 Evelyn makes a slip here. The Duke of Monmouth's mother was, it is well known, Lucy Walters, sometimes called Mrs. Barlow, and heretofore mentioned in the "Diary." Nor is he more correct as to the Countess of Sussex. Lady Anne Fitzroy, as she is called in the Peerage books, was married to Lennard Dacre, Earl of Sussex, by whom she left a daughter only, who succeeded on her father's death to the Barony of Dacre. On the other hand, the Duke of Southampton, the Duke of Grafton, and the Duke of Northumberland, were all of them children of Charles II. by the Duchess of Cleveland.
37 Evelyn makes an error here. The Duke of Monmouth's mother was, as is well known, Lucy Walters, also referred to as Mrs. Barlow, and mentioned earlier in the "Diary." He’s also not correct about the Countess of Sussex. Lady Anne Fitzroy, as she is referred to in the peerage books, was married to Lennard Dacre, Earl of Sussex, and she left behind only a daughter who inherited the Barony of Dacre upon her father’s death. In contrast, the Duke of Southampton, the Duke of Grafton, and the Duke of Northumberland were all children of Charles II with the Duchess of Cleveland.
38 Doubtless Philip Rotière, who introduced the figure of Britannia into the coinage, taking for his model the King's favorite, Frances Stewart, Duchess of Richmond.
38 Surely, Philip Rotière, who brought the image of Britannia to the coins, based it on the King's favorite, Frances Stewart, Duchess of Richmond.
39 Ezrael Tonge was bred in University College, Oxford, and being puritanically inclined, quitted the University; but in 1648 returned, and was made a Fellow. He had the living of Pluckley, in Kent, which he resigned in consequence of quarrels with his parishioners and Quakers. In 1657, he was made fellow of the newly-erected College at Durham, and that being dissolved in 1660, he taught school at Islington. He then went with Colonel Edward Harley to Dunkirk, and subsequently took a small living in Herefordshire (Lentwardine); but quitted it for St. Mary Stayning, in London, which, after the fire in 1666, was united to St. Michael, Wood Street. These he held till his death, in 1680. He was a great opponent of the Roman Catholics. Wood mentions several publications of his, among which are, "The Jesuits Unmasked," 1678; "Jesuitical Aphorisms," 1678; and "The Jesuits' Morals," 1680 (1670); the two latter translated from the French. (Wood's "Athenæ, Oxon." vol. ii. p. 502.) Evelyn speaks of the last of these translations as having been executed by his desire: and it figures in a notable passage of Oates's testimony. Oates said, for example, "that Thomas Whitbread, a priest, on 13th of June, 16 . . did tell the rector of St. Omer's that a Minister of the Church of England had scandalously put out the 'Jesuits' Morals' in English, and had endeavored to render them odious, and had asked the Rector whether he thought Oates might know him? and the Rector called, the deponent, who heard these words as he stood at the chamber door, and when he went into the chamber of the Provincial, he asked him 'If he knew the author of the "Jesuits' Morals?"' deponent answered, 'His person, but not his name.' Whitbread then demanded, whether he would undertake to poison, or assassinate the author; which deponent undertook, having £50 reward promised him, and appointed to return to England."
39 Ezrael Tonge was educated at University College, Oxford, and with his puritan background, he left the University; however, he returned in 1648 and became a Fellow. He held the position of vicar in Pluckley, Kent, but resigned due to conflicts with his parishioners and Quakers. In 1657, he became a fellow of the newly established College at Durham, which was dissolved in 1660, after which he ran a school in Islington. Later, he accompanied Colonel Edward Harley to Dunkirk and eventually accepted a small position in Herefordshire (Lentwardine); he left that for St. Mary Stayning in London, which, after the fire in 1666, was merged with St. Michael, Wood Street. He held these roles until his death in 1680. He was a strong opponent of Roman Catholics. Wood mentions several of his works, including "The Jesuits Unmasked," 1678; "Jesuitical Aphorisms," 1678; and "The Jesuits' Morals," 1680 (1670), the latter two translated from French. (Wood's "Athenæ, Oxon." vol. ii. p. 502.) Evelyn notes that the last translation was done at his request and it is referenced in an important part of Oates's testimony. Oates stated, for example, "that Thomas Whitbread, a priest, on June 13, 16... told the rector of St. Omer's that a Minister of the Church of England had scandalously published the 'Jesuits' Morals' in English, and had tried to make them look bad, and he asked the Rector if he thought Oates would recognize him? The Rector called the deponent, who heard these words while standing at the chamber door, and when he entered the chamber of the Provincial, he asked him, 'Do you know the author of the "Jesuits' Morals?"' The deponent responded, 'I know his face, but not his name.' Whitbread then asked if he would be willing to poison or assassinate the author, to which the deponent agreed, having been promised a £50 reward, and arranged to return to England."
41 He returned the day before, the 12th of September. This is another of the indications that the entries of this Diary were not always made on the precise days they refer to.
41 He came back the day before, on September 12th. This is another hint that the entries in this Diary weren't always written on the exact days they mention.
42 Now the British Museum.
Now the British Museum.
45 Sherbet and chocolate.
Sherbet and chocolate.
47 Denys Papin, a French physician and mathematician, who possessed so remarkable a knowledge of mathematics, that he very nearly brought the invention of the steam engine into working order. He assisted Mr. Boyle in his pneumatic experiments, and was afterward mathematical professor at Marburg. He died in 1710.
47 Denys Papin, a French doctor and mathematician, had such impressive knowledge of math that he almost invented a functional steam engine. He helped Mr. Boyle with his experiments on air pressure and later became a math professor at Marburg. He passed away in 1710.
49 Notice was taken of this in a previous passage of the "Diary." The different counties were bound to supply provisions of various kinds, and these were collected by officers called purveyors, whose extortions often excited the attention of Parliament.
49 This was mentioned earlier in the "Diary." The different counties were required to provide various kinds of food, and these were gathered by officials known as purveyors, whose unfair practices often drew the attention of Parliament.
50 Evelyn adds a note: "400 feet in length, 9 feet high, 5 in diameter, in my now ruined garden, thanks to the Czar of Muscovy."—"Sylva," book ii. chap. vi.
50 Evelyn adds a note: "400 feet long, 9 feet high, 5 feet wide, in my now destroyed garden, thanks to the Czar of Muscovy."—"Sylva," book ii. chap. vi.
51 Henry Percy, eighth Earl of Northumberland, shot himself in the Tower, to which he had been committed on a charge of high treason in June, 1585.
51 Henry Percy, the eighth Earl of Northumberland, took his own life in the Tower, where he had been imprisoned on a charge of high treason in June 1585.
52 Doctor Edward Tyson, a learned physician, born at Clevedon, Somersetshire, in 1649, who became reader of the anatomical lecture in Surgeons' Hall, and physician to the hospitals of Bethlehem and Bridewell, which offices he held at his death, Aug. 1, 1708. He was an ingenious writer, and has left various Essays in the Philosophical Transactions and Hook's Collections. He published also "The Anatomy of a Porpoise Dissected at Gresham College," and "The Anatomy of a Pigmy Compared with a Monkey, an Ape, and a Man," 4to., 1698-99.
52 Doctor Edward Tyson, a knowledgeable physician, was born in Clevedon, Somersetshire, in 1649. He became the lecturer for anatomical studies at Surgeons' Hall and served as a physician for the hospitals of Bethlehem and Bridewell, positions he held until his death on August 1, 1708. He was a skilled writer and contributed various essays to the Philosophical Transactions and Hook's Collections. He also published "The Anatomy of a Porpoise Dissected at Gresham College" and "The Anatomy of a Pygmy Compared with a Monkey, an Ape, and a Man," 4to., 1698-99.
54 When brought up for judgment, Armstrong insisted on his right to a trial, the act giving that right to those who came in within a year, and the year not having expired. Jefferies refused it; and when Armstrong insisted that he asked nothing but law, Jefferies told him he should have it to the full, and ordered his execution in six days. When Jefferies went to the King at Windsor soon after, the King took a ring from his finger and gave it to Jefferies. Burnet, ii. 989.
54 When it was time for his trial, Armstrong emphasized his right to a hearing, as the law granted that right to anyone who had come forward within a year, and the year hadn’t yet passed. Jefferies denied his request; and when Armstrong insisted all he wanted was to follow the law, Jefferies told him he would receive that in full and ordered his execution in six days. Shortly after, when Jefferies visited the King at Windsor, the King took a ring off his finger and gave it to Jefferies. Burnet, ii. 989.
55 The account given of this by Charles's brother and successor, is, that when the King's life was wholly despaired of, and it was time to prepare for another world, two Bishops came to do their function, who reading the prayers appointed in the Common Prayer Book on that occasion, when they came to the place where usually they exhort a sick person to make a confession of his sins, the Bishop of Bath and Wells, who was one of them, advertised him, IT WAS NOT OF OBLIGATION; and after a short exhortation, asked him if he was sorry for his sins? which the King saying he was, the Bishop pronounced the absolution, and then, asked him if he pleased to receive the Sacrament? to which the King made no reply; and being pressed by the Bishop several times, gave no other answer but that it was time enough, or that he would think of it.
55 The account given by Charles's brother and successor is that when the King's life was completely hopeless, and it was time to prepare for another world, two Bishops came to perform their duties. As they read the prayers from the Common Prayer Book for such occasions, when they reached the point where they usually encourage a sick person to confess their sins, the Bishop of Bath and Wells, who was one of them, told him, It wasn't out of obligation.; and after a brief encouragement, asked him if he was sorry for his sins. The King replied that he was, so the Bishop pronounced the absolution. Then he asked if the King wanted to receive the Sacrament, but the King didn’t respond. When pressed by the Bishop several times, he simply said it was time enough or that he would think about it.
King James adds, that he stood all the while by the bedside, and seeing the King would not receive the Sacrament from them, and knowing his sentiments, he desired the company to stand a little from the bed, and then asked the King whether he should send for a priest, to which the King replied: "For God's sake, brother, do, and lose no time." The Duke said he would bring one to him; but none could be found except Father Huddleston, who had been so assistant in the King's escape from Worcester; he was brought up a back staircase, and the company were desired to withdraw, but he (the Duke of York) not thinking fit that he should be left alone with the King, desired the Earl of Bath, a Lord of the Bedchamber, and the Earl of Feversham, Captain of the Guard, should stay; the rest being gone, Father Huddleston was introduced, and administered the Sacrament.—"Life of James II."
King James adds that he stood by the bedside the whole time, and seeing that the King wouldn’t accept the Sacrament from them, and knowing his feelings, he asked those present to step back from the bed. Then he asked the King if he should send for a priest, to which the King replied, "For God's sake, brother, do so, and don’t waste any time." The Duke said he would bring one to him, but no one could be found except Father Huddleston, who had helped the King escape from Worcester. He was brought up a back staircase, and the others were asked to leave, but the Duke of York thought it wouldn’t be right for him to be alone with the King, so he asked the Earl of Bath, a Lord of the Bedchamber, and the Earl of Feversham, Captain of the Guard, to stay. After the others left, Father Huddleston was introduced and administered the Sacrament.—"Life of James II."
56 This is the substance (and very nearly the words employed) of what is stated by King James II. in the MS. printed in his life; but in that MS. are some words which Evelyn has omitted. For example, after speaking of the members of the Church of England as good and loyal subjects, the King adds, "AND THEREFORE I SHALL ALWAYS TAKE CARE TO DEFEND AND SUPPORT IT." James then goes on to say, that being desired by some present to allow copies to be taken, he said he had not committed it to writing; on which Mr. Finch (then Solicitor-General and afterward Earl of Aylesford) replied, that what his Majesty had said had made so deep an impression on him, that he believed he could repeat the very words, and if his Majesty would permit him, he would write them down, which the King agreeing to, he went to a table and wrote them down, and this being shown to the King, he approved of it, and it was immediately published. The King afterward proceeds to say: "No one can wonder that Mr. Finch should word the speech as strong as he could in favor of the Established Religion, nor that the King in such a hurry should pass it over without reflection; for though his Majesty intended to promise both security to their religion and protection to their persons, he was afterward convinced it had been better expressed by assuring them he never would endeavor to alter the Established Religion, than that he would endeavor to preserve it, and that he would rather support and defend the professors of it, than the religion itself; they could not expect he should make a conscience of supporting what in his conscience he thought erroneous: his engaging not to molest the professors of it, nor to deprive them or their successors of any spiritual dignity, revenue, or employment, but to suffer the ecclesiastical affairs to go on in the track they were in, was all they could wish or desire from a Prince of a different persuasion; but having once approved that way of expressing it which Mr. Finch had made choice of, he thought it necessary not to vary from it in the declarations or speeches he made afterward, not doubting but the world would understand it in the meaning he intended.——'Tis true, afterward IT WAS pretended he kept not up to this engagement; but had they deviated no further from the duty and allegience which both nature and repeated oath obliged them to, THAN HE DID FROM HIS WORD, they had still remained as happy a people as they really were during his short reign in England."—"Life of James II.," ii. 435. The words printed in small caps in this extract are from the interlineations of the son of King James II.
56 This captures the essence (and almost the exact words used) of what King James II. states in the manuscript published in his biography. However, there are some words in that manuscript that Evelyn has left out. For instance, after referring to the members of the Church of England as good and loyal subjects, the King adds, "AND SO I WILL ALWAYS MAKE SURE TO DEFEND AND SUPPORT IT." James continues, mentioning that he was asked by some people present to allow copies to be taken, and he replied that he hadn’t written it down. Mr. Finch (who was Solicitor-General at the time and later became the Earl of Aylesford) then responded that what the King had said had made such a strong impression on him that he believed he could repeat the exact words, and if His Majesty allowed, he would write them down. The King agreed, and Finch went to a table to write them. Once it was shown to the King, he approved it, and it was published right away. The King then goes on to say: "No one can be surprised that Mr. Finch would phrase the speech as strongly as he could in support of the Established Religion, nor that the King, in such a rush, would let it pass without reflection; for while His Majesty intended to promise both safety to their religion and protection to their individuals, he later realized it would have been better to ensure them he would never attempt to change the Established Religion rather than saying he would try to preserve it, and that he would rather support and defend its followers than the religion itself; they couldn’t expect him to feel obligated to support what he believed to be wrong: his promise not to disturb its followers or to take away any spiritual position, revenue, or role from them or their successors, but to allow ecclesiastical affairs to continue as they were, was all they could wish or expect from a Prince of a different belief; but having once accepted the way Mr. Finch chose to express it, he thought it necessary not to depart from it in the declarations or speeches he made afterward, being confident that the world would understand it in the sense he intended.——It’s true, later It was claimed he didn’t uphold this commitment; but had they strayed no further from the duty and loyalty which both nature and their repeated oaths required of them, THAN HE DID FROM HIS WORD, they would still have remained as happy a people as they genuinely were during his brief reign in England."—"Life of James II.," ii. 435. The words printed in small caps in this extract are from the interlineations of the son of King James II.
57 Ante, p. 204.
58 James, in his Life, makes no mention of this lease, but only says HE continued to collect them, which conduct was not blamed; but, on the contrary, he was thanked for it, in an address from the Middle Temple, penned by Sir Bartholomew Shore, and presented by Sir Humphrey Mackworth, carrying great authority with it; nor did the Parliament find fault.
58 James, in his Life, doesn't mention this lease, but only states HE kept collecting them, which wasn’t criticized; rather, he was thanked for it in a message from the Middle Temple, written by Sir Bartholomew Shore and delivered by Sir Humphrey Mackworth, which had significant authority; nor did the Parliament complain.
59 In the first Dutch war, while Evelyn was one of the Commissioners for sick and wounded, L'Estrange in his "Gazette" mentioned the barbarous usage of the Dutch prisoners of war: whereupon Evelyn wrote him a very spirited letter, desiring that the Dutch Ambassador (who was then in England) and his friends would visit the prisoners, and examine their provisions; and he required L'Estrange to publish that vindication in his next number.
59 During the first Dutch war, while Evelyn was one of the Commissioners for sick and wounded soldiers, L'Estrange mentioned in his "Gazette" the harsh treatment of Dutch prisoners of war. In response, Evelyn wrote him a passionate letter, asking that the Dutch Ambassador (who was in England at the time) and his associates visit the prisoners to review their conditions. He urged L'Estrange to publish that defense in his next issue.
60 The "Life of James II." contains an account of the circumstances of the Duke of Monmouth's birth, which may be given in illustration of the statements of the text. Ross, tutor to the Duke of Monmouth, is there said to have proposed to Bishop Cosins to sign a certificate of the King's marriage to Mrs. Barlow, though her own name was Walters: but this the Bishop refused. She was born of a gentleman's family in Wales, but having little means and less grace, came to London to make her fortune. Algernon Sydney, then a Colonel in Cromwell's army, had agreed to give her fifty broad pieces (as he told the Duke of York); but being ordered hastily away with his regiment, he missed his bargain. She went into Holland, where she fell into the hands of his brother, Colonel Robert Sydney, who kept her for some time, till the King hearing of her, got her from him. On which the Colonel was heard to say, Let who will have her, she is already sped; and, after being with the King, she was so soon with child, that the world had no cause to doubt whose child it was, and the rather that when he grew to be a man, he very much resembled the Colonel both in stature and countenance, even to a wart on his face. However, the King owned the child. In the King's absence she behaved so loosely, that on his return from his escape at Worcester he would have no further commerce with her, and she became a common prostitute at Paris.
60 The "Life of James II." includes a story about the circumstances surrounding the Duke of Monmouth's birth, which may help clarify the points made in the text. Ross, the Duke of Monmouth's tutor, allegedly suggested to Bishop Cosins that he should sign a certificate confirming the King's marriage to Mrs. Barlow, although her actual name was Walters; however, the Bishop declined. She came from a gentleman's family in Wales but had little money and even less charm, so she moved to London to try to improve her situation. Algernon Sydney, who was then a Colonel in Cromwell's army, had promised her fifty broad pieces (as he told the Duke of York); but when he was suddenly called away with his regiment, he lost that opportunity. She then went to Holland, where she ended up with his brother, Colonel Robert Sydney, who kept her for a while until the King found out about her and took her from him. Following this, the Colonel reportedly said, "Let whoever wants her have her; she's already taken care of," and shortly after being with the King, she became pregnant so quickly that no one could doubt whose child it was, especially since he strongly resembled the Colonel in both build and appearance, even having a similar wart on his face. Still, the King acknowledged the child. While the King was away, she acted so irresponsibly that upon his return from his escape at Worcester, he refused to have anything to do with her, and she eventually became a common prostitute in Paris.
61 Evelyn subjoins this note:—"As to that of the Saludador (of which likewise I remember Sir Arthur Hopton, formerly as Ambassador at Madrid, had told me many like wonders), Mr. Pepys passing through Spain, and being extremely inquisitive of the truth of these pretended miracles of the Saludadors, found a very famous one at last, to whom he offered a considerable reward if he would make a trial of the oven, or any other thing of that kind, before him; the fellow ingenuously told him, that finding he was a more than ordinary curious person, he would not deceive him, and so acknowledged that he could do none of the feats really, but that what they pretended was all a cheat, which he would easily discover, though the poor superstitious people were easily imposed upon; yet have these impostors an allowance of the Bishops to practice their jugglings. This Mr. Pepys affirmed to me; but said he, I did not conceive it fit to interrupt his Majesty, who so solemnly told what they pretended to do.
61 Evelyn adds this note:—"Regarding the Saludador (which reminds me that Sir Arthur Hopton, who was an Ambassador in Madrid, told me many similar stories), Mr. Pepys, while traveling through Spain and being very curious about the truth behind these supposed miracles of the Saludadores, eventually encountered a very famous one. He offered a considerable reward for a demonstration of the oven or something similar in front of him. The man honestly told him that, since he could tell Pepys was unusually curious, he wouldn't deceive him and admitted that he couldn't really perform any of the feats. What they claimed was all a scam, which could be easily uncovered, even though the poor superstitious people were easily fooled. Still, these frauds have permission from the Bishops to continue their tricks. Mr. Pepys confirmed this to me but mentioned that he didn’t think it was right to interrupt His Majesty, who was so earnestly discussing what they claimed to do."
J. E."
J. E.
63 This is by no means the case now.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ That's not true anymore.
65 Thomas Ken.
66 Thomas White.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Thomas White.
67 Francis Turner.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Francis Turner.
68 John Lake.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ John Lake.
69 William Lloyd.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ William Lloyd.
70 Sir John Trelawny, Bart.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Sir John Trelawny, Baronet.
"My Lord, The honor and reputation which your Grace's piety, prudence, and signal courage, have justly merited and obtained, not only from the sons of the Church of England, but even universally from those Protestants among us who are Dissenters from her discipline; God Almighty's Providence and blessing upon your Grace's vigilancy and extraordinary endeavors will not suffer to be diminished in this conjuncture. The conversation I now and then have with some in place who have the opportunity of knowing what is doing in the most secret recesses and cabals of our Church's adversaries, obliges me to acquaint you, that the calling of your Grace and the rest of the Lords Bishops to Court, and what has there of late been required of you, is only to create a jealousy and suspicion among well-meaning people of such compliances, as it is certain they have no cause to apprehend. The plan of this and of all that which is to follow of seeming favor thence, is wholly drawn by the Jesuits, who are at this time more than ever busy to make divisions among us, all other arts and mechanisms having hitherto failed them. They have, with other things contrived that your Lordships the Bishops should give his Majesty advice separately, without calling any of the rest of the Peers, which, though maliciously suggested, spreads generally about the town. I do not at all question but your Grace will speedily prevent the operation of this venom, and that you will think it highly necessary so to do, that your Grace is also enjoined to compose a form of prayer, wherein the Prince of Orange is expressly to be named the Invader: of this I presume not to say anything; but for as much as in all the Declarations, etc., which have hitherto been published in pretended favor of the Church of England, there is not once the least mention of the Reformed or Protestant Religion, but only of the Church of England as by Law Established, which Church the Papists tell us is the Church of Rome, which is (say they) the Catholic Church of England—that only is established by Law; the Church of England in the Reformed sense so established, is but by an usurped authority. The antiquity of THAT would by these words be explained, and utterly defeat this false and subdolous construction, and take off all exceptions whatsoever; if, in all extraordinary offices, upon these occasions, the words Reformed and Protestant were added to that of the Church of England by Law established. And whosoever threatens to invade or come against us, to the prejudice of that Church, in God's name, be they Dutch or Irish, let us heartily pray and fight against them. My Lord, this is, I confess, a bold, but honest period; and, though I am well assured that your Grace is perfectly acquainted with all this before, and therefore may blame my impertinence, as that does αλλοτριοεπισκοπειν; yet I am confident you will not reprove the zeal of one who most humbly begs your Grace's pardon, with your blessing. Lond., 10 Oct., 1688." (From a copy in Evelyn's handwriting.) See post, p. 285.
"My Lord, The honor and reputation that your Grace's faith, wisdom, and remarkable bravery have rightfully earned, not just from the members of the Church of England but also from Protestants among us who disagree with its practices; God's Providence and blessings on your Grace's diligence and exceptional efforts will not diminish in this situation. The discussions I occasionally have with some in positions who know what’s happening in the hidden corners and schemes of our Church's opponents compel me to inform you that the summons of your Grace and the other Lords Bishops to Court, and what has recently been asked of you there, is merely to stir jealousy and suspicion among well-meaning people about such compliance, which they have no reason to fear. This plan and all that follows under the guise of favor comes entirely from the Jesuits, who are currently more active than ever in trying to create divisions among us, since all their other strategies have so far failed. They have also arranged for your Lordships, the Bishops, to advise His Majesty separately, without calling any of the other Peers, which, although suggested with malice, is spreading widely around town. I have no doubt that your Grace will swiftly counteract this harmful scheme, and that you will deem it necessary to do so, as your Grace is also instructed to create a prayer form that specifically names the Prince of Orange as the Invader: of this, I won't presume to comment; but since in all the declarations and such that have been released under the pretended favor of the Church of England, there isn't a single mention of the Reformed or Protestant Religion, but only of the Church of England as by Law Established, which the Papists claim is the Church of Rome, which they say is the Catholic Church of England—that alone is established by Law; the Church of England, recognized in the Reformed sense, is just established by usurped authority. The ancient claim of THAT would clarify this and completely dismantle this false and crafty interpretation, and remove all objections whatsoever; if, in all extraordinary offices on these occasions, the words Reformed and Protestant were appended to that of the Church of England by Law Established. And whoever threatens to invade or attack us, to the detriment of that Church, in God's name, be they Dutch or Irish, let us fervently pray and fight against them. My Lord, this is, I admit, a bold but honest statement; and, while I am quite sure your Grace is already well aware of all this, and may reproach me for being inconsiderate, I still trust that you will not disapprove of the zeal of someone who most humbly seeks your Grace's pardon, along with your blessing. Lond., 10 Oct., 1688." (From a copy in Evelyn's handwriting.) See post, p. 285.
73 Sir George, as we have seen, had written in praise of a Private Life, which Mr. Evelyn answered by a book in praise of Public Life and Active Employment.
73 Sir George, as we've seen, had written praising a Private Life, which Mr. Evelyn responded to with a book praising Public Life and Active Employment.
74 Poor Pepys, as the reader knows, had already undergone an imprisonment, with perhaps just as much reason as the present, on the absurd accusation of having sent information to the French Court of the state of the English Navy.
74 Poor Pepys, as the reader knows, had already been imprisoned, with maybe just as much reason as now, on the ridiculous charge of having shared information with the French Court about the condition of the English Navy.
75 They are now at Oxford, having been presented to the University in 1755 by Henrietta, Countess Dowager of Pomfret, widow of Thomas, the first Earl.
75 They are currently at Oxford, having been introduced to the University in 1755 by Henrietta, Countess Dowager of Pomfret, widow of Thomas, the first Earl.
78 See post pp. 351-52.
79 Some account of these poor people is given in Bray and Manning's "History of Surrey," ii. 714, from the papers of the Rev. Mr. Miller, Vicar of Effingham, in that county, who was chaplain to the King's forces in the colony from 1692 to 1695. Some of the accused were convicted and executed; but Sir William Phipps, the Governor, had the good sense to reprieve, and afterward pardon, several; and the Queen approved his conduct.
79 Some information about these unfortunate people is provided in Bray and Manning's "History of Surrey," ii. 714, taken from the papers of Rev. Mr. Miller, Vicar of Effingham, in that county, who served as chaplain to the King's forces in the colony from 1692 to 1695. Some of those accused were found guilty and executed; however, Sir William Phipps, the Governor, wisely decided to grant reprieves and later pardons to several, a move that the Queen supported.
84 While the Czar was in his house. Evelyn's servant writes to him: "There is a house full of people, and right nasty. The Czar lies next your library, and dines in the parlor next your study. He dines at ten o'clock and at six at night; is very seldom at home a whole day; very often in the King's yard, or by water, dressed in several dresses. The King is expected here this day; the best parlor is pretty clean for him to be entertained in. The King pays for all he has."
84 While the Czar was at his residence, Evelyn's servant writes to him: "There’s a house full of people, and it’s quite unpleasant. The Czar is lying next to your library and dining in the parlor next to your study. He eats at ten in the morning and six in the evening; he’s rarely home for a whole day; he often spends time in the King’s yard or by the water, dressed in various outfits. The King is expected here today; the best parlor is fairly clean for him to be entertained in. The King covers all his expenses."
85 The celebrated navigator, born in 1652, the time of whose death is uncertain. His "Voyage Round the World" has gone through many editions, and the substance of it has been transferred to many collections of voyages.
85 The famous navigator, born in 1652, with the exact date of his death unknown. His "Voyage Round the World" has been published in many editions, and its content has been included in numerous collections of voyages.
87 Afterward Bishop of Ely. He died 31st of July, 1714. King George I. purchased this library after the Bishop's death, for £6,000, and presented it to the University of Cambridge, where it now is.
87 Later became the Bishop of Ely. He passed away on July 31, 1714. King George I bought this library after the Bishop's death for £6,000 and gave it to the University of Cambridge, where it is now located.
88 Ante, p. 330.
89 Captain Kidd; he was hanged about two years afterward with some of his accomplices. This was one of the charges brought by the Commons against Lord Somers.
89 Captain Kidd; he was hanged about two years later along with some of his accomplices. This was one of the accusations made by the Commons against Lord Somers.
90 The volume alluded to was "An Enquiry into the Causes of the Miscarriage of the Scots Colony at Darien: Or an Answer to a Libel," entitled "A Defense of the Scots abdicating Darien." See Votes of the House of Commons, 15th January, 1699-1700.
90 The book mentioned was "An Inquiry into the Causes of the Failure of the Scots Colony at Darien: Or a Response to a Libel," titled "A Defense of the Scots Abandoning Darien." See Votes of the House of Commons, January 15, 1699-1700.
91 Ante, p. 349.
93 Justinian Champneys, Thomas Culpepper, William Culpepper, William Hamilton, and David Polhill, gentlemen of considerable property and family in the county. There is a very good print of them in five ovals on one plate, engraved by R. White, in 1701. They desired the Parliament to mind the public more, and their private heats less. They were confined till the prorogation, and were much visited. Burnet gives an account of them.
93 Justinian Champneys, Thomas Culpepper, William Culpepper, William Hamilton, and David Polhill, gentlemen of significant wealth and family in the county. There's a nice print of them in five ovals on a single plate, engraved by R. White in 1701. They asked Parliament to focus more on public matters and less on their personal conflicts. They were held until the session was suspended and received many visitors. Burnet provides a description of them.
94 The Captains Kirby and Wade, having been tried and condemned to die by a court-martial held on them in the West Indies, were sent home in the "Bristol;" and, on its arrival at Portsmouth were both shot on board, not being suffered to land on English ground.
94 Captains Kirby and Wade, after a court-martial in the West Indies that found them guilty and sentenced them to death, were sent back home on the "Bristol." Upon arriving in Portsmouth, they were both executed on the ship without being allowed to set foot on English soil.
96 There is a very good Life of him, with his portrait prefixed, by Thomas Warton, Fellow of Trinity College, and Poetry Professor at Oxford.
96 There's a great biography of him, including his portrait at the beginning, written by Thomas Warton, a Fellow of Trinity College and Professor of Poetry at Oxford.
Transcriber's Note
Footnotes have been moved to the end of the book.
Footnotes have been relocated to the end of the book.
Inconsistencies have been retained in spelling, hyphenation, formatting, punctuation, and grammar, except where indicated in the list below:
Inconsistencies in spelling, hyphenation, formatting, punctuation, and grammar have been kept, except where noted in the list below:
- "dilligent" changed to "diligent" on Page 1
- "suprising" changed to "surprising" on Page 2
- Period added after "1665" on Page 5
- Period added after "ought!)" on Page 12
- Semicolon changed to a period added after "1666" on Page 13
- Period added after "etc" on Page 26
- "Luke, xix," changed to "Luke xix." on Page 26
- Quote added after "Writings," in Footnote 9
- "day's" changed to "days" in Footnote 10
- "Fore-land" changed to "Foreland" on Page 34
- Comma added after "August" on Page 36
- Period changed to a comma after "received" on Page 40
- Comma changed to a period after "1667" on Page 41
- Comma added after "April" on Page 41
- Period added after "years" on Page 45
- Period changed to a comma after "September" on Page 51
- Period added after "1671" on Page 68
- "rarites" changed to "rarities" on Page 72
- Comma changed to a period added after "fowl" on Page 73
- Period added after "April" on Page 79
- Period added after "home" on Page 83
- Period added after "me" on Page 83
- Period added after "1672" on Page 86
- Comma removed after "Psalm" on Page 87
- Period added after "design" on Page 89
- Period added after "go-by" on Page 91
- Closed paren changed to a comma after "Burnet" on Page 98
- "eloqence" changed to "eloquence" on Page 98
- Comma removed after "Luke" on Page 102
- Period added after "Dr" on Page 104
- Period changed to a comma after "him" on Page 104
- Period added after "1675" on Page 105
- Period added after "London" on Page 106
- "gentelman" changed to "gentleman" on Page 107
- Comma added after "November" on Page 108
- Comma added after "December" on Page 108
- Period added after "xx" on Page 109
- Comma removed after "Isaiah" on Page 109
- Period added after "Mr" on Page 110
- Period added after "manner" on Page 110
- Period added after "chargeable" on Page 111
- "Duke s" changed to "Duke's" on Page 111
- Period added after "Mr" on Page 111
- Period added after "large" on Page 119
- Period added after "Queen" on Page 120
- "Brounker" changed to "Brouncker" on Page 121
- "exemplaily" changed to "exemplarily" on Page 124
- Comma removed after "Europeans" on Page 147
- Comma added after "Mingrelia" on Page 147
- "day s" changed to "day's" on Page 154
- Period added after "them" on Page 157
- "at at" changed to "at" on Page 163
- Period added after "Mr" on Page 166
- "Archibishop s" changed to "Archibishop's" on Page 168
- Period added after "lute" on Page 195
- Period added after "II" on Page 208
- Comma changed to a period added after "1685" on Page 212
- Period added after "solemn" on Page 212
- "ingenius" changed to "ingenious" on Page 214
- "familar" changed to "familiar" on Page 214
- Period added after "spirits" on Page 216
- Period added after "family" on Page 216
- Period removed after "Sir" on Page 220
- Period added after "worship" on Pago 224
- "pro ceeded" changed to "proceeded" on Page 229
- Period added after "end" on Page 229
- Semicolon changed to colon after "note" in Footnote 61
- Quote added after "but, says he," on page 234
- Comma added after "February" on Page 248
- "etc," changed to "etc." on Page 256
- "minatures" changed to "miniatures" on Page 258
- "minatured" changed to "miniatured" on Page 258
- Period added after "St" on Page 262
- Period added after "Mr" on Page 262
- "Martin s" changed to "Martin's" on Page 262
- Period added after "ended" on Page 263
- Period added after "1687" on Page 263
- "mal-administration" changed to "maladministration" on Page 294
- "Guatavus" changed to "Gustavus" on Page 295
- Period added after "St" on Page 300
- Comma added after "February" on Page 300
- Period added after "£40,000" on Page 307
- Period added after "season" on Page 307
- Period added after "Bishop" on Page 307
- Period added after "frost" on Page 307
- Period added after "Tower" on Page 307
- Period added after "years" on Page 308
- Comma added after "July" on Page 311
- Comma changed to a period added after "1693" on Page 321
- Period added after "Mr" on Page 337
- "prœmunire" changed to "præmunire" on Page 337
- Period added after "1699" on Page 348
- Period added after "Mr" on Page 355
- "Norfold" changed to "Norfolk" on Page 356
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!