This is a modern-English version of Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVI, July 1852, Vol. V, originally written by Various. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.

HARPER'S
NEW MONTHLY MAGAZINE.


No. 26.—JULY, 1852.—Vol. 5.


THE ARMORY AT SPRINGFIELD
BY JACOB ABBOTT

GENERAL VIEW. General view.

SPRINGFIELD.

The Connecticut river flows through the State of Massachusetts, from north to south, on a line about half way between the middle of the State and its western boundary. The valley through which the river flows, which perhaps the stream itself has formed, is broad and fertile, and it presents, in the summer months of the year, one widely extended scene of inexpressible verdure and beauty. The river meanders through a region of broad and luxuriant meadows which are overflowed and enriched by an annual inundation. These meadows extend sometimes for miles on either side of the stream, and are adorned here and there with rural villages, built wherever there is a little elevation of land—sufficient to render human habitations secure. The broad and beautiful valley is bounded on either hand by an elevated and undulating country, with streams, mills, farms, villages, forests, and now and then a towering mountain, to vary and embellish the landscape. In some cases a sort of spur or projection from the upland country projects into the valley, forming a mountain summit there, from which the most magnificent views are obtained of the beauty and fertility of the surrounding scene.

The Connecticut River runs through the state of Massachusetts from north to south, roughly halfway between the center of the state and its western border. The valley that the river flows through, likely shaped by the river itself, is wide and fertile, presenting an expansive view of incredible greenery and beauty during the summer months. The river winds through a landscape of broad, lush meadows that are replenished and enriched by annual flooding. These meadows can stretch for miles on either side of the river, and are dotted with rural villages built on elevated land, providing safe spots for people to live. The wide and beautiful valley is bordered by a hilly and rolling landscape filled with streams, mills, farms, towns, forests, and occasionally a towering mountain, all adding variety and charm to the scenery. In some places, a spur from the higher ground juts into the valley, creating a mountain peak that offers breathtaking views of the beautiful, fertile surroundings.

There are three principal towns upon the banks of the Connecticut within the Massachusetts lines: Greenfield on the north—where the river enters into Massachusetts from between New Hampshire and Vermont—Northampton at the centre, and Springfield on the south. These towns are all built at points where the upland approaches near to the river. Thus at Springfield the land rises by a gentle ascent from near the bank of the stream to a spacious and beautiful plain which overlooks the valley. The town is built upon this declivity. It is so enveloped in trees that from a distance it appears simply like a grove with cupolas and spires rising above the masses of forest foliage; but to one within it, it presents every where most enchanting pictures of rural elegance and beauty. The streets are avenues of trees. The houses are surrounded by gardens, and so enveloped in shrubbery that in many cases they reveal themselves to the passer-by only by the glimpse that he obtains of a colonnade or a piazza, through some little vista which opens for a moment and then closes again as he passes along. At one point, in ascending from the river to the plain above, the tourist stops involuntarily to admire the view[Pg 2] which opens on either side, along a winding and beautiful street which here crosses his way. It is called Chestnut-street on the right hand, and Maple-street on the left—the two portions receiving their several names from the trees with which they are respectively adorned. The branches of the trees meet in a dense and unbroken mass of foliage over the middle of the street, and the sidewalk presents very precisely the appearance and expression of an alley in the gardens of Versailles.

There are three main towns along the Connecticut River within Massachusetts: Greenfield in the north—where the river enters Massachusetts from between New Hampshire and Vermont—Northampton in the center, and Springfield in the south. All these towns are located where the upland comes close to the river. In Springfield, the land rises gently from the riverbank to a spacious and beautiful plain that overlooks the valley. The town is built on this slope. It's so surrounded by trees that from a distance, it looks like a grove with cupolas and spires peeking above the forest canopy; but for those inside, it offers stunning views of rural charm and beauty. The streets are lined with trees. The houses are surrounded by gardens and so covered in shrubs that often they reveal themselves to passersby only through brief glimpses of a colonnade or a porch, visible for a moment before disappearing again as one walks by. At one point, as you climb from the river up to the plain above, visitors can't help but stop to admire the scenery that unfolds on either side along a winding, beautiful street. It's called Chestnut Street on the right and Maple Street on the left—named for the trees lining each side. The branches of the trees create a thick, continuous canopy above the street, and the sidewalk resembles an alley in the gardens of Versailles.


THE ARMORY GROUNDS.

On reaching the summit of the ascent, the visitor finds himself upon an extended plain, with streets of beautiful rural residences on every hand, and in the centre a vast public square occupied and surrounded by the buildings of the Armory. These buildings are spacious and elegant in their construction, and are arranged in a very picturesque and symmetrical manner within the square, and along the streets that surround it. The grounds are shaded with trees; the dwellings are adorned with gardens and shrubbery. Broad and neatly-kept walks, some graveled, others paved, extend across the green or along the line of the buildings, opening charming vistas in every direction. All is quiet and still. Here and there a solitary pedestrian is seen moving at a distance upon the sidewalk, or disappearing among the trees at the end of an avenue; and perhaps the carriage of some party of strangers stands waiting at a gate. The visitor who comes upon this scene on a calm summer morning, is enchanted by the rural beauty that surrounds him, and by the air of silence and repose which reigns over it all. He hears the distant barking of a dog, the voices of children at play, or the subdued thundering of the railway-train crossing the river over its wooden viaduct, far down the valley—and other similar rural sounds coming from a distance through the calm morning air—but all around him and near him is still. Can it be possible, he asks, that such a scene of tranquillity and loveliness can be the outward form and embodiment of a vast machinery incessantly employed in the production of engines of carnage and death?

Upon reaching the top of the hill, the visitor finds himself on a vast plain, surrounded by beautiful rural homes everywhere he looks, with a large public square in the center filled with the buildings of the Armory. These structures are spacious and stylishly built, arranged in a picturesque and symmetrical way within the square and along the streets that encircle it. The grounds are shaded by trees, and the houses are enhanced with gardens and shrubs. Wide, well-kept pathways, some gravel and others paved, spread across the greenery or along the lines of the buildings, revealing charming views in every direction. Everything is peaceful and calm. Occasionally, a lone pedestrian can be seen in the distance walking on the sidewalk or disappearing among the trees at the end of an avenue; maybe a carriage for some group of visitors is waiting by a gate. The visitor who encounters this scene on a quiet summer morning is captivated by the rural beauty around him and the sense of silence and tranquility that pervades the area. He hears the distant bark of a dog, the laughter of children playing, and the faint rumble of a train crossing the river on its wooden viaduct far down in the valley—along with other similar rural sounds drifting through the serene morning air—but everything around him is still. Can it really be, he wonders, that such a scene of peace and beauty can represent a large machine constantly engaged in creating engines of destruction and death?

It is, however, after all, perhaps scarcely proper to call the arms that are manufactured by the American government, and stored in their various arsenals, as engines of carnage and destruction. They ought, perhaps, to be considered rather as instruments of security and peace; for their destination is, as it would seem, not to be employed in active service in the performance of the function for which they are so carefully prepared; but to be consigned, when once finished, to eternal quiescence and repose. They protect by their existence, and not by their action; but in order that this, their simple existence, should be efficient as protection, it is necessary that the instruments themselves should be fitted for their work in the surest and most perfect manner. And thus we have the very singular and extraordinary operation going on, of manufacturing with the greatest care, and with the highest possible[Pg 3] degree of scientific and mechanical skill, a vast system of machinery, which, when completed, all parties concerned most sincerely hope and believe will, in a great majority of cases, remain in their depositories undisturbed forever. They fulfill their vast function by their simple existence—and thus, though in the highest degree useful, are never to be used.

It seems a bit inappropriate to call the weapons made by the American government and stored in their various arsenals instruments of violence and destruction. They should really be seen more as tools for security and peace; their purpose doesn't seem to be to be actively used for the reason they were created but rather to sit quietly and peacefully once they’re finished. They provide protection just by existing, not by being used; however, for this mere existence to effectively serve as protection, the weapons need to be made with the utmost care and perfection. So, we find the unusual and remarkable situation where a massive system of machinery is built with great attention and the highest level of scientific and mechanical expertise, with the hope and belief that, in most cases, they will remain undisturbed in their storage forever. They fulfill their significant role simply by existing—and so, while they are highly valuable, they are never intended to be used.


THE BUILDINGS.

The general appearance of the buildings of the Armory is represented in the engraving placed at the head of this article. The point from which the view is taken, is on the eastern side of the square—that is, the side most remote from the town. The level and extended landscape seen in the distance, over the tops of the buildings, is the Connecticut valley—the town of Springfield lying concealed on the slope of the hill, between the buildings and the river. The river itself, too, is concealed from view at this point by the masses of foliage which clothe its banks, and by the configuration of the land.

The overall look of the Armory buildings is shown in the engraving at the beginning of this article. The view is taken from the eastern side of the square, which is the side farthest from the town. The flat and wide landscape seen in the distance, beyond the buildings, is the Connecticut valley—the town of Springfield is hidden on the hillside, between the buildings and the river. At this spot, the river is also out of sight due to the thick foliage covering its banks and the shape of the land.

The middle building in the foreground, marked by the cupola upon the top of it, is called the Office. It contains the various counting-rooms necessary for transacting the general business of the Armory, and is, as it were, the seat and centre of the power by which the whole machinery of the establishment is regulated. North and south of it, and in a line with it, are two shops, called the North and South Filing Shops, where, in the several stories, long ranges of workmen are found, each at his own bench, and before his own window, at work upon the special operation, whatever it may be, which is assigned to him. On the left of the picture is a building with the end toward the observer, two stories high in one part, and one story in the other part. The higher portion—which in the view is the portion nearest the observer—forms the Stocking Shop, as it is called; that is the shop where the stocks are made for the muskets, and fitted to the locks and barrels. The lower portion is the Blacksmith's Shop. The Blacksmith's Shop is filled with small forges, at which the parts of the lock are forged. Beyond the Blacksmith's Shop, and in a line with it, and forming, together with the Stocking Shop and the Blacksmith's Shop, the northern side of the square, are several dwelling-houses, occupied as the quarters of certain officers of the Armory. The residence of the Commanding Officer, however, is not among them. His house stands on the west side of the square, opposite to the end of the avenue which is seen opening directly before the observer in the view. It occupies a very delightful and commanding situation on the brow of the hill, having a view of the Armory buildings and grounds upon one side, and overlooking the town and the valley of the Connecticut on the other.

The middle building in the foreground, marked by the dome on top, is called the Office. It houses the various counting rooms needed for the general operations of the Armory and serves as the main hub of the power that regulates the entire establishment. To the north and south of it, aligned with it, are two shops known as the North and South Filing Shops, where multiple workers are found on different floors, each at their own bench and window, focused on the specific tasks assigned to them. On the left side of the picture is a building facing the viewer, two stories high on one side and one story on the other. The taller section, which is closest to the viewer, is the Stocking Shop, where the stocks for the muskets are crafted and fitted to the locks and barrels. The lower part is the Blacksmith's Shop, filled with small forges where the components of the locks are forged. Beyond the Blacksmith's Shop, in line with it, and together with the Stocking and Blacksmith's Shops, forms the northern side of the square, are several houses used as quarters for some officers of the Armory. However, the Commanding Officer's residence is not among them. His house stands on the west side of the square, directly opposite the end of the avenue visible before the viewer. It sits in a very pleasant and prominent location on the hillside, offering views of the Armory buildings and grounds on one side and overlooking the town and the Connecticut valley on the other.

A little to the south of the entrance to the Commanding Officer's house, stands a large edifice, called the New Arsenal. It is the building with the large square tower—seen in the view in the middle distance, and near the centre of the[Pg 4] picture. This building is used for the storage of the muskets during the interval that elapses from the finishing of them to the time when they are sent away to the various permanent arsenals established by government in different parts of the country, or issued to the troops. Besides this new edifice there are two or three other buildings which are used for the storage of finished muskets, called the Old Arsenals. They stand in a line on the south side of the square, and may be seen on the left hand, in the view. These buildings, all together, will contain about five hundred thousand muskets. The New Arsenal, alone, is intended to contain three hundred thousand.

A little south of the entrance to the Commanding Officer's house stands a large building called the New Arsenal. It's the one with the big square tower, visible in the middle distance and near the center of the[Pg 4] picture. This building is used to store muskets during the time between when they are completed and when they are sent off to the various permanent arsenals set up by the government in different parts of the country, or issued to the troops. In addition to this new building, there are two or three other structures used for storing finished muskets, referred to as the Old Arsenals. They are lined up on the south side of the square and can be seen on the left in the view. Together, these buildings can hold about five hundred thousand muskets. The New Arsenal alone is meant to hold three hundred thousand.


THE WATER SHOPS.

THE MIDDLE WATER SHOPS. THE MIDDLE WATER SHOPS.

Such is the general arrangement of the Arsenal buildings, "on the hill." But it is only the lighter work that is done here. The heavy operations, such as rolling, welding, grinding, &c., are all performed by water-power. The stream which the Ordnance Department of the United States has pressed into its service to do this work, is a rivulet that meanders through a winding and romantic valley, about half a mile south of the town. On this stream are three falls, situated at a distance perhaps of half a mile from each other. At each of these falls there is a dam, a bridge, and a group of shops. They are called respectively the Upper, Middle, and Lower Water Shops. The valley in which these establishments are situated is extremely verdant and beautiful. The banks of the stream are adorned sometimes with green, grassy slopes, and sometimes with masses of shrubbery and foliage, descending to the water. The road winds gracefully from one point of view to another, opening at every turn some new and attractive prospect. The shops and all the hydraulic works are very neatly and very substantially constructed, and are kept in the most perfect order: so that the scene, as it presents itself to the party of visitors, as they ride slowly up or down the road in their carriage, or saunter along upon the banks of the stream on foot, forms a very attractive picture.

This is the general layout of the Arsenal buildings "on the hill." However, only the lighter work takes place here. The heavy operations, like rolling, welding, grinding, etc., are all powered by water. The stream that the Ordnance Department of the United States uses for this purpose is a small river that flows through a winding, picturesque valley, about half a mile south of the town. There are three waterfalls along this stream, located about half a mile apart. At each waterfall, there’s a dam, a bridge, and a set of workshops. These are known as the Upper, Middle, and Lower Water Shops. The valley where these facilities are located is very lush and beautiful. The stream banks are sometimes lined with green, grassy slopes and sometimes with clusters of shrubs and trees reaching down to the water. The road winds gracefully from one viewpoint to another, revealing a new and charming scene at every turn. The shops and all the hydraulic facilities are well-made and kept in excellent condition; the overall view, as it appears to visitors riding slowly in their carriage or strolling along the stream’s banks, creates a very appealing picture.


THE MUSKET BARREL.

The fundamental, and altogether the most important operation in the manufacture of the musket, is the formation of the barrel; for it is obvious, that on the strength and perfection of the barrel, the whole value and efficiency of the weapon when completed depends. One would suppose, that the fabrication of so simple a thing as a plain and smooth hollow tube of iron, would be a very easy process; but the fact is, that so numerous are the obstacles and difficulties that are in the way, and so various are the faults, latent and open, into which the workman may allow his work to run, that the forming of the barrel is not only the most important, but by far the most difficult of the operations at the Armory—one which requires the most constant vigilance and attention on the part of the workman, during the process of fabrication, and the application of multiplied tests to prove the accuracy and correctness of the work at every step of the progress of it, from beginning to end.

The most essential operation in making a musket is creating the barrel. Clearly, the strength and quality of the barrel determine the overall value and effectiveness of the finished weapon. You might think that making a simple, smooth hollow tube of iron would be easy, but in reality, there are so many obstacles and challenges that could arise. There are all sorts of hidden and obvious faults that can occur, making barrel formation not just the most crucial step, but also the most challenging at the Armory. This process demands constant vigilance and focus from the worker, along with numerous tests to ensure accuracy and quality at every stage, from start to finish.

The barrels are made from plates of iron, of suitable form and size, called scalps or barrel plates. These scalps are a little more than two feet long, and about three inches wide. The barrel when completed, is about three feet six inches long, the additional length being gained by the elongating of the scalp under the hammer during the process of welding. The scalps are heated, and then rolled up over an iron rod, and the edges being lapped are welded together,[Pg 5] so as to form a tube of the requisite dimensions—the solid rod serving to preserve the cavity within of the proper form. This welding of the barrels is performed at a building among the Middle Water Shops. A range of tilt hammers extend up and down the room, with forges in the centre of the room, one opposite to each hammer, for heating the iron. The tilt hammers are driven by immense water-wheels, placed beneath the building—there being an arrangement of machinery by which each hammer may be connected with its moving power, or disconnected from it, at any moment, at the pleasure of the workman. Underneath the hammer is an anvil. This anvil contains a die, the upper surface of which, as well as the under surface of a similar die inserted in the hammer, is formed with a semi-cylindrical groove, so that when the two surfaces come together a complete cylindrical cavity is formed, which is of the proper size to receive the barrel that is to be forged. The workman heats a small portion of his work in his forge, and then standing directly before the hammer, he places the barrel in its bed upon the anvil, and sets his hammer in motion, turning the barrel round and round continually under the blows. Only a small portion of the seam is closed at one heat, eleven heats being required to complete the work. To effect by this operation a perfect junction of the iron, in the overlapping portions, so that the substance of iron shall be continuous and homogeneous throughout, the same at the junction as in every other part, without any, the least, flaw, or seam, or crevice, open or concealed, requires not only great experience and skill, but also most unremitting and constant attention during the performance of the work. Should there be any such flaw, however deeply it may be concealed, and however completely all indications of it may be smoothed over and covered up by a superficial finishing, it is sure to be exposed at last, to the mortification and loss of the workman, in the form of a great gaping rent, which is brought out from it under the inexorable severity of the test to which the work has finally to be subjected.

The barrels are made from iron plates, which are the right shape and size, called scalps or barrel plates. These scalps are just over two feet long and about three inches wide. Once finished, the barrel is about three feet six inches long, with the extra length achieved by stretching the scalp under a hammer during welding. The scalps are heated and then rolled around an iron rod, with the edges overlapping and welded together,[Pg 5] forming a tube of the required dimensions—while the solid rod keeps the cavity inside in the right shape. This welding process takes place in a building among the Middle Water Shops. A row of tilt hammers runs up and down the room, with forges in the center for heating the iron, one across from each hammer. The tilt hammers are powered by huge water wheels located beneath the building—there's a mechanism that allows each hammer to be connected or disconnected from its power source at any time, as the worker chooses. Below the hammer is an anvil. This anvil has a die, which has a semi-cylindrical groove on its upper surface, similar to a groove on a die in the hammer. When the two surfaces press together, they create a complete cylindrical cavity, sized perfectly for the barrel being forged. The worker heats a small section of the work in the forge, then stands directly in front of the hammer, places the barrel on the anvil, and activates the hammer, turning the barrel continuously under the strikes. Only a small part of the seam is sealed with each heat, needing eleven heats to finish the job. Achieving a perfect join in the overlapping iron sections—ensuring the iron is uniform and continuous throughout, without any flaws, seams, or gaps—demands not just extensive experience and skill but also constant and focused attention while working. If there is any flaw, no matter how hidden or how well masked it may be by a smooth finish, it will eventually reveal itself, causing frustration and loss for the worker, often as a large, open hole that emerges under the harsh testing the work must ultimately endure.

THE WELDING ROOM. Welding Workshop.

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE WORKMEN.

We say to the loss as well as to the mortification of the workman, for it is a principle that pervades the whole administration of this establishment, though for special reasons the principle is somewhat modified in its application to the welder, as will hereafter be explained, that each workman bears the whole loss that is occasioned by the failure of his work to stand its trial, from whatever cause the failure may arise. As a general rule each workman stamps every piece of work that passes through his hands with his own mark—a mark made indelible too—so that even after the musket is finished, the history of its construction can be precisely traced, and every operation performed upon it, of whatever kind, can be carried home to the identical workman who performed it. The various parts thus marked are subject to very close inspection, and to very rigid tests, at different periods, and whenever any failure occurs, the person who is found to be responsible for it is charged with the loss. He loses not only his own pay for the work which he performed upon the piece in question, but for the whole value of the piece at the time that the defect is discovered. That is, he has not only to lose his own labor, but he must also pay for all the other labor expended upon the piece, which through the fault of his work becomes useless. For example, in the case of the barrel, there is a certain amount of labor expended upon the iron, to form it into scalps, before it comes into the welder's hands. Then after it is welded it must be bored and turned, and subjected to some other minor operations before the strength of the welding can be proved. If now, under the test that is applied to prove this strength—a test which will be explained fully in the sequel—the work gives way, and if, on examination of the rent, it proves to have been caused by imperfection in the welding, and not by any original defect in the iron, the welder, according to the general principle which governs in this respect all the operations of the establishment, would have to lose not only the value of his own labor, in welding the barrel, but that of all the other operations which had been performed upon it, and which were rendered worthless by his agency. It is immaterial whether the misfortune in such cases is occasioned by accident, or carelessness, or want of skill. In either case the workman is responsible. This rule is somewhat[Pg 6] relaxed in the case of the welder, on whom it would, perhaps, if rigidly enforced, bear somewhat too heavily. In fact many persons might regard it as a somewhat severe and rigid rule in any case—and it would, perhaps, very properly be so considered, were it not that this responsibility is taken into the account in fixing the rate of wages; and the workmen being abundantly able to sustain such a responsibility do not complain of it. The system operates on the whole in the most salutary manner, introducing, as it does, into every department of the Armory, a spirit of attention, skill, and fidelity, which marks even the countenances and manners of the workmen, and is often noticed and spoken of by visitors. In fact none but workmen of a very high character for intelligence, capacity, and skill could gain admission to the Armory—or if admitted could long maintain a footing there.

We talk about the loss as well as the embarrassment of the worker, because it’s a principle that influences the entire operation of this place. However, for specific reasons, this principle is applied a bit differently for the welder, as will be explained later. Each worker is responsible for the total loss that results from their work failing to meet standards, regardless of the reason for the failure. Generally, every worker marks each piece of work they handle with their own indelible mark, so that even after the musket is completed, you can trace its construction history and attribute every action taken on it to the exact worker who did it. The marked parts undergo strict inspections and rigorous testing at various stages, and whenever a failure occurs, the responsible person is held accountable. They not only lose their pay for the work they did on the specific piece but also the total value of the piece at the time the flaw is found. This means they lose their own labor and must also cover all the other labor that went into the piece, which is rendered useless due to their mistake. For instance, with the barrel, some labor is spent to shape the iron into initial forms before it reaches the welder. After welding, it needs to be bored, shaped, and undergo other minor processes before the welding strength can be verified. If, during the testing meant to determine this strength—a test that will be explained more in detail later—the work fails, and the inspection shows it was due to a welding imperfection rather than a flaw in the iron, the welder would have to account for not just their own labor in welding the barrel, but for all other work previously done on it that is now worthless due to their error. It doesn’t matter if the failure was due to an accident, negligence, or lack of skill—the worker is responsible. This rule is somewhat[Pg 6] relaxed for the welder, as applying it strictly could be too harsh. Many might find this rule rather severe overall, and it would rightly be viewed as such if it weren't for the fact that this responsibility is considered when setting wages; the workers are more than capable of handling such accountability, so they don’t complain. The system generally promotes a healthy environment, fostering a culture of diligence, skill, and loyalty throughout the Armory, which is evident in the demeanor and attitudes of the workers and is often noticed by visitors. In reality, only workers with exceptional intelligence, ability, and skill can get into the Armory—or stay for long if they are let in.

The welders are charged one dollar for every barrel lost through the fault of their work. They earn, by welding, twelve cents for each barrel; so that by spoiling one, they lose the labor which they expend upon eight. Being thus rigidly accountable for the perfection of their work, they find that their undivided attention is required while they are performing it; and, fortunately perhaps for them, there is nothing that can well divert their attention while they are engaged at their forges, for such is the incessant and intolerable clangor and din produced by the eighteen tilt hammers, which are continually breaking out in all parts of the room, into their sudden paroxysms of activity, that every thing like conversation in the apartment is almost utterly excluded. The blows of the hammers, when the white-hot iron is first passed under them and the pull of the lever sets them in motion, are inconceivably rapid, and the deafening noise which they make, and the showers of sparks which they scatter in every direction around, produce a scene which quite appalls many a lady visitor when she first enters upon it, and makes her shrink back at the door, as if she were coming into some imminent danger. The hammers strike more than six hundred blows in a minute, that is more than ten in every second; and the noise produced is a sort of rattling thunder, so overpowering when any of the hammers are in operation near to the observer, that the loudest vociferation uttered close to the ear, is wholly inaudible. Some visitors linger long in the apartment, pleased with the splendor and impressiveness of the scene. Others consider it frightful, and hasten away.

The welders are charged one dollar for every barrel lost due to their work. They earn twelve cents for each barrel they weld; so, by ruining one, they lose the effort they put into eight. Since they are strictly responsible for the quality of their work, they realize that they need to give their full attention while doing it. Fortunately for them, there’s nothing that can easily distract them while they’re at their forges, as the constant and unbearable noise from the eighteen tilt hammers, which frequently erupt into sudden bursts of activity throughout the room, almost completely prevents any conversation in the space. The strikes of the hammers are incredibly fast when the white-hot iron is passed under them and the lever pulls them into action, creating a deafening noise and sending sparks flying in every direction, which overwhelms many female visitors the first time they experience it, making them hesitate at the door as if facing some immediate threat. The hammers strike over six hundred times a minute, which is more than ten times every second; the noise is like rattling thunder, so intense when any of the hammers are operating close to the observer that even the loudest shout nearby becomes completely inaudible. Some visitors stay awhile in the room, captivated by the beauty and intensity of the scene. Others find it terrifying and quickly leave.


FINISHING OPERATIONS.—BORING.

From the Middle Water Shops, where this welding is done, the barrels are conveyed to the Upper Shops, where the operations of turning, boring and grinding are performed. Of course the barrel when first welded is left much larger in its outer circumference, and smaller in its bore, than it is intended to be when finished, in order to allow for the loss of metal in the various finishing operations. When it comes from the welder the barrel weighs over seven pounds:[Pg 7] when completely finished it weighs but about four and a half pounds, so that nearly one half of the metal originally used, is cut away by the subsequent processes.

From the Middle Water Shops, where the welding takes place, the barrels are moved to the Upper Shops for turning, boring, and grinding. Naturally, when the barrel is first welded, it's much larger on the outside and smaller on the inside than it will be when it's finished, to account for the metal that will be lost during the finishing processes. Fresh from the welder, the barrel weighs over seven pounds: [Pg 7] but when it's fully finished, it weighs only about four and a half pounds, meaning that nearly half of the original metal is removed during the subsequent processes.

The first of these processes is the boring out of the interior. The boring is performed in certain machines called boring banks. They consist of square and very solid frames of iron, in which, as in a bed, the barrel is fixed, and there is bored out by a succession of operations performed by means of certain tools which are called augers, though they bear very little resemblance to the carpenter's instrument so named. These augers are short square bars of steel, highly polished, and sharp at the edges—and placed at the ends of long iron rods, so that they may pass entirely through the barrel to be bored by them, from end to end. The boring parts of these instruments, though they are in appearance only plain bars of steel with straight and parallel sides, are really somewhat smaller at the outer than at the inner end, so that, speaking mathematically, they are truncated pyramids, of four sides, though differing very slightly in the diameters of the lower and upper sections.

The first of these processes is the boring out of the interior. The boring is done using special machines called boring banks. They consist of solid square iron frames where the barrel is secured, and it is bored out through a series of operations using specific tools called augers, which look very different from the carpenter's tool of the same name. These augers are short, polished square bars of steel with sharp edges and are attached to long iron rods, allowing them to pass completely through the barrel being bored, from one end to the other. Although the boring sections of these tools appear to be simple straight bars of steel with parallel sides, they are actually slightly narrower at the outer end than at the inner end, making them mathematically truncated pyramids with four sides, though differing only slightly in the diameters of the top and bottom sections.

The barrels being fixed in the boring bank, as above described, the end of the shank of the auger is inserted into the centre of a wheel placed at one end of the bank, where, by means of machinery, a slow rotary motion is given to the auger, and a still slower progressive motion at the same time. By this means the auger gradually enters the hollow of the barrel, boring its way, or rather enlarging its way by its boring, as it advances. After it has passed through it is withdrawn, and another auger, a very little larger than the first is substituted in its place; and thus the calibre of the barrel is gradually enlarged, almost to the required dimensions.

The barrels are secured in the boring bank, as described above. The end of the auger's shank is inserted into the center of a wheel located at one end of the bank. With the help of machinery, a slow rotary motion is applied to the auger, along with an even slower progressive motion. This allows the auger to gradually enter the hollow of the barrel, boring its way—or rather, enlarging its path—as it moves forward. After it has passed through, it is removed, and another auger, slightly larger than the first, is put in its place. In this way, the barrel's caliber is gradually enlarged, almost to the required dimensions.

Almost, but not quite; for in the course of the various operations which are subsequent to the boring, the form of the interior of the work is liable to be slightly disturbed, and this makes it necessary to reserve a portion of the surplus metal within, for a final operation. In fact the borings to which the barrel are subject, alternate in more instances than one with other operations, the whole forming a system far too nice and complicated to be described fully within the limits to which we are necessarily confined in such an article as this. It is a general principle however that the inside work is kept always in advance of the outside, as it is the custom with all machinists and turners to adopt the rule that is so indispensable and excellent in morals, namely, to make all right first within, and then to attend to the exterior. Thus in the case of the musket barrel the bore is first made correct. Then the outer surface of the work is turned and ground down to a correspondence with it. The reverse of this process, that is first shaping the outside of it, and then boring it out within, so as to make the inner and outer surfaces to correspond, and the metal every where to be of equal thickness, would be all but impossible.

Almost, but not quite; because during the various processes that happen after boring, the shape of the inside of the work can be slightly altered, making it necessary to keep some of the extra metal inside for a final operation. In fact, the boring of the barrel is often interspersed with other operations, creating a system that’s too intricate and detailed to fully explain within the scope of an article like this. However, a general principle is that the interior work is always ahead of the exterior, as it's standard for all machinists and turners to follow a rule that is both essential and commendable in morals: first ensure everything is right on the inside, and then focus on the outside. So, in the case of the musket barrel, the bore is first made accurate. Then, the outer surface of the work is turned and ground down to match it. Doing the opposite—shaping the outside first and then boring it out to ensure the inner and outer surfaces match, with the metal being uniformly thick—would be nearly impossible.


TURNING.

After the boring, then, of the barrel, comes the turning of the outside of it. The piece is supported in the lathe by means of mandrels inserted into the two ends of it, and there it slowly revolves, bringing all parts of its surface successively under the action of a tool fixed firmly in the right position for cutting the work to its proper form. Of course the barrel has a slow progressive as well as rotary motion during this process, and the tool itself, with the rest in which it is firmly screwed, advances or recedes very regularly and gradually, in respect to the work, as the process goes on, in order to form the proper taper of the barrel in proceeding from the breech to the muzzle. The main work however in this turning process is performed by the rotation of the barrel. The workman thus treats his material and his tools with strict impartiality. In the boring, the piece remains at rest, and the tool does its work by revolving. In the turning, on the other hand, the piece must take its part in active duty, being required to revolve against the tool, while the tool itself remains fixed in its position in the rest.

After the boring, the next step is turning the outside of the barrel. The piece is held in the lathe by mandrels inserted into both ends, and it slowly spins, bringing different parts of its surface under the action of a tool that’s securely fixed in the right position for shaping the work. The barrel also has a slow forward motion in addition to its rotation during this process, and the tool, along with the rest it’s tightly secured to, moves back and forth steadily and gradually relative to the work. This movement helps form the proper taper of the barrel from the breech to the muzzle. However, the main work in this turning process is done by the barrel’s rotation. The worker treats both the material and tools with strict fairness. In the boring process, the piece stays still while the tool rotates to do its job. In the turning process, on the other hand, the piece has to take an active role, rotating against the tool, while the tool itself stays fixed in its position.

Among the readers of this article there will probably be many thousands who have never had the opportunity to witness the process of turning or boring iron, and to them it may seem surprising that any tool can be made with an edge sufficiently enduring to stand in such a service. And it is indeed true that a cutting edge destined to maintain itself against iron must be of very excellent temper, and moreover it must have a peculiar construction and form, such that when set in its proper position for service, the cutting part shall be well supported, so to speak, in entering the metal, by the mass of the steel behind it. It is necessary, too, to keep the work cool by a small stream of water constantly falling upon the point of action. The piece to be turned, moreover, when of iron, must revolve very slowly; the process will not go on successfully at a rapid rate; though in the case of wood the higher the speed at which the machinery works, within certain limits, the more perfect the operation. In all these points the process of turning iron requires a very nice adjustment; but when the conditions necessary to success are all properly fulfilled, the work goes on in the most perfect manner, and the observer who is unaccustomed to witness the process is surprised to see the curling and continuous shaving of iron issuing from the point where the tool is applied, being cut out there as smoothly and apparently as easily as if the material were lead.

Among the readers of this article, there are likely many thousands who have never had the chance to see the process of turning or boring iron. To them, it might be surprising that any tool can have an edge strong enough to last in such work. It is indeed true that a cutting edge meant to endure against iron must be of very high quality and must also have a specific design and shape. This ensures that when positioned correctly for work, the cutting part is well supported by the mass of steel behind it as it enters the metal. Additionally, it's essential to keep the work cool by having a small stream of water constantly falling on the point of action. When turning iron, the piece must also rotate very slowly; the process won't be successful at a high speed. However, with wood, the faster the machinery operates—within certain limits—the better the result. All these factors require precise adjustments in the process of turning iron. But when all the necessary conditions for success are met, the work proceeds perfectly, and an observer who isn't used to seeing this process will be amazed to see curling and continuous shavings of iron coming from the point where the tool is applied, being cut as smoothly and seemingly easily as if the material were lead.


THE STRAIGHTENING.

One of the most interesting and curious parts of the process of the manufacture of the barrel, is the straightening of it. We ought, perhaps, rather to say the straightenings, for it is found necessary that the operation should be several times performed. For example, the barrel must be straightened before it is turned, and then, inasmuch as in the process of turning it generally gets more or less sprung, it must be straightened again afterward. In fact, every important operation performed upon the barrel is likely to cause some deflection in it, which requires to be subsequently corrected, so that the process must be repeated several times. The actual work of straightening, that is the mechanical act that is performed, is very simple—consisting as it does of merely striking a blow. The whole difficulty lies in determining when and where the correction is required. In other words, the making straight is very easily and quickly done; the thing attended with difficulty is to find out when and where the work is crooked; for the deflections which it is thus required to remedy, are so extremely slight, that all ordinary modes of examination would fail wholly to detect them; while yet they are sufficiently great to disturb very essentially the range and direction of the ball which should issue from the barrel, affected by them.

One of the most interesting and curious parts of making a barrel is the straightening process. We should probably refer to it as straightening because this step needs to be done multiple times. For instance, the barrel must be straightened before it’s turned, and since the turning process often causes it to become slightly warped, it needs to be straightened again afterward. In fact, any major operation done on the barrel can lead to some distortion that needs to be corrected later, so this process is repeated several times. The actual work of straightening, which is the mechanical action involved, is quite simple—it's just a matter of striking a blow. The challenge lies in figuring out when and where the correction is necessary. In other words, making it straight is quick and easy; the tough part is identifying when and where the work is crooked. The distortions that need fixing are so minimal that regular inspection methods would completely miss them, yet they are significant enough to seriously affect the range and direction of the ball fired from the barrel.

STRAIGHTENING THE BARRELS. ALIGNING THE BARRELS.

The above engraving represents the workman in the act of examining the interior of a barrel with a view to ascertaining whether it be straight. On the floor, in the direction toward which the barrel is pointed, is a small mirror, in which the workman sees, through the tube, a reflection of a certain pane of glass in the window. The pane in question is marked by a diagonal line, which may be seen upon it, in the view, passing from one corner to the other. This diagonal line now is reflected by the mirror into the bore of the barrel, and then it is reflected again to the eye of the observer; for the surface of the iron on the inside of the barrel is left in a most brilliantly polished condition, by the boring and the operations connected therewith. Now the[Pg 9] workman, in some mysterious way or other, detects the slightest deviation from straightness in the barrel, by the appearance which this reflection presents to his eye, as he looks through the bore in the manner represented in the drawing. He is always ready to explain very politely to his visitor exactly how this is done, and to allow the lady to look through the tube and see for herself. All that she is able to see, however, in such cases is a very resplendent congeries of concentric rings, forming a spectacle of very dazzling brilliancy, which pleases and delights her, though the mystery of the reflected line generally remains as profound a mystery after the observation as before. This is, in fact, the result which might have been expected, since it is generally found that all demonstrations and explanations relating to the science of optics and light, addressed to the uninitiated, end in plunging them into greater darkness than ever.

The engraving above shows a worker examining the inside of a barrel to check if it’s straight. On the floor, in the direction the barrel points, there’s a small mirror, through which the worker sees a reflection of a certain pane of glass in the window. This pane has a diagonal line running from one corner to the other. The line is reflected by the mirror into the barrel's bore, and then reflected again to the observer's eye, as the inside of the barrel is polished to a brilliant shine from the boring process. Now the[Pg 9] worker somehow detects the slightest deviation from straightness in the barrel based on how this reflection appears as he looks through the bore, as shown in the drawing. He is always ready to politely explain to visitors exactly how this works and lets them look through the tube to see for themselves. However, all they usually see is a stunning array of concentric rings, creating a dazzling spectacle that pleases and delights them, even though the mystery of the reflected line usually remains just as puzzling after they’ve observed it as it was before. This outcome is expected, since it’s commonly found that all demonstrations and explanations about the science of optics and light, given to those who aren’t familiar with the subject, often leave them even more confused than before.

The only object which the mirror upon the floor serves, in the operation, is to save the workman from the fatigue of holding up the barrel, which it would be necessary for him to do at each observation, if he were to look at the window pane directly. By having a reflecting surface at the floor he can point the barrel downward, when he wishes to look through it, and this greatly facilitates the manipulation. There is a rest, too, provided for the barrel, to support it while the operator is looking through. He plants the end of the tube in this rest, with a peculiar grace and dexterity, and then, turning it round and round, in order to bring every part of the inner surface to the test of the reflection, he accomplishes the object of his scrutiny in a moment, and then recovering the barrel, he lays it across a sort of anvil which stands by his side, and strikes a gentle blow upon it wherever a correction was found to be required. Thus the operation, though it often seems a very difficult one for the visitor to understand, proves a very easy one for the workman to perform.

The only purpose of the mirror on the floor is to save the worker from the tiring task of holding up the barrel, which he would have to do for each observation if he were looking directly at the window. With a reflective surface on the floor, he can point the barrel downward when he wants to look through it, making the process much easier. There's also a support for the barrel, allowing it to rest while the operator looks through it. He places the end of the tube in this support with a certain finesse and skill, and then, rotating it to check every part of the inner surface against the reflection, he quickly achieves his goal. After that, he retrieves the barrel and lays it across an anvil next to him, gently tapping it wherever adjustments are needed. So, while the process may seem difficult for visitors to grasp, it's actually quite simple for the worker to carry out.


OLD MODE OF STRAIGHTENING.

In former times a mode altogether different from this was adopted to test the interior rectitude of the barrel. A very slender line, formed of a hair or some similar substance, was passed through the barrel—dropped through, in fact, by means of a small weight attached to the end of it. This line was then drawn tight, and the workman looking through, turned the barrel round so as to bring the line into coincidence successively with every portion of the inner surface. If now there existed any concavity in any part of this surface, the line would show it by the distance which would there appear between the line itself and its reflection in the metal. The present method, however, which has now been in use about thirty years, is found to be far superior to the old one; so much so in fact that all the muskets manufactured before that period have since been condemned as unfit for use, on account mainly of the crookedness of the barrels. When we consider, however, that the calculation is that in ordinary engagements less than one out[Pg 10] of every hundred of the balls that are discharged take effect; that is, that ninety-nine out of every hundred go wide of the mark for which they are intended, from causes that must be wholly independent of any want of accuracy in the aiming, it would seem to those who know little of such subjects, that to condemn muskets for deviating from perfect straightness by less than a hair, must be quite an unnecessary nicety. The truth is, however, that all concerned in the establishment at Springfield, seem to be animated by a common determination, that whatever may be the use that is ultimately to be made of their work, the instrument itself, as it comes from their hands, shall be absolutely perfect; and whoever looks at the result, as they now attain it, will admit that they carry out their determination in a very successful manner.

In the past, a completely different method was used to check the straightness of the barrel. A very thin line, made from a hair or something similar, was passed through the barrel—actually dropped through, with a small weight attached to its end. This line was then pulled tight, and the worker looking through would rotate the barrel to align the line with every part of the inner surface. If there was any concavity at any point on this surface, the line would indicate it by showing a gap between the line and its reflection in the metal. However, the current method, which has been in use for about thirty years, is much better than the old one. In fact, all muskets made before this change have since been deemed unfit for use primarily because of the crooked barrels. When we consider that statistics show less than one in every hundred bullets fired actually hits the target—that is, ninety-nine out of every hundred miss for reasons unrelated to aiming accuracy—it might seem to those unfamiliar with these matters that condemning muskets for being less than perfectly straight by a hair's breadth is overly precise. The reality, however, is that everyone involved in the Springfield operation shares a common goal: no matter what the final use of their work may be, the instrument they produce must be absolutely perfect. And anyone who examines the results they achieve now will agree that they successfully fulfill this goal.


CINDER HOLES.

Various other improvements have been made from time to time in the mode of manufacturing and finishing the musket, which have led to the condemnation or alteration of those made before the improvements were introduced. A striking illustration of this is afforded by the case of what are called cinder holes. A cinder hole is a small cavity left in the iron at the time of the manufacture of it—the effect, doubtless, of some small development of gas forming a bubble in the substance of the iron. If the bubble is near the inner surface of the barrel when it is welded, the process of boring and finishing brings it into view, in the form of a small blemish seen in the side of the bore. At a former period in the history of the Armory, defects of this kind were not considered essential, so long as they were so small as not to weaken the barrel. It was found, however, at length that such cavities, by retaining the moisture and other products of combustion resulting from the discharge of the piece, were subject to corrosion, and gradual enlargement, so as finally to weaken the barrel in a fatal manner. It was decided therefore that the existence of cinder holes in a barrel should thenceforth be a sufficient cause for its rejection, and all the muskets manufactured before that time have since been condemned and sold; the design of the department being to retain in the public arsenals only arms of the most perfect and unexceptionable character.

Various improvements have been made over time in the manufacturing and finishing of the musket, which have led to the rejection or modification of those made before these updates were introduced. A clear example of this is seen in what are known as cinder holes. A cinder hole is a small cavity left in the iron during its production—the result, likely, of a small gas bubble forming in the iron. If the bubble is close to the inner surface of the barrel when it's welded, the process of boring and finishing will reveal it as a small blemish in the side of the bore. In the past, defects like this were not seen as significant, as long as they were small enough not to weaken the barrel. However, it was eventually discovered that these cavities could hold moisture and other combustion byproducts from firing the gun, leading to corrosion and gradual enlargement, which could ultimately compromise the barrel in a serious way. Consequently, it was decided that the presence of cinder holes in a barrel would henceforth be a valid reason for rejecting it, and all muskets made before that decision have since been condemned and sold; the aim of the department is to keep only the most flawless and reliable arms in public arsenals.

At the present time, in the process of manufacturing the barrels, it is not always found necessary to reject a barrel absolutely in every case where a cinder hole appears. Sometimes the iron may be forced in, by a blow upon the outside, sufficiently to enable the workman to bore the cinder hole out entirely. This course is always adopted where the thickness of the iron will allow it, and in such cases the barrel is saved. Where this can not be done, the part affected is sometimes cut off, and a short barrel is made, for an arm called a musketoon.

Currently, during the manufacturing of barrels, it’s not always necessary to completely reject a barrel just because a cinder hole shows up. Sometimes, a blow on the outside can push the iron in enough for the worker to completely bore out the cinder hole. This method is always used when the thickness of the iron permits it, and in these instances, the barrel is salvaged. If this isn’t possible, the affected part may be cut off, and a shorter barrel is made for a weapon called a musketoon.


THE GRINDING.

After the barrel is turned to nearly its proper size it is next to be ground, for the purpose of removing the marks left by the tool in turning,[Pg 11] and of still further perfecting its form. For this operation immense grindstones, carried by machinery, are used, as seen in the engraving. These stones, when in use, are made to revolve with great rapidity—usually about four hundred times in a minute—and as a constant stream of water is kept pouring upon the part where the barrel is applied in the grinding, it is necessary to cover them entirely with a wooden case, as seen in the engraving, to catch and confine the water, which would otherwise be thrown with great force about the room. The direct action therefore of the stone upon the barrel in the process of grinding is concealed from view.

After the barrel is shaped to almost the right size, the next step is grinding it to remove the tool marks left from shaping and to further refine its shape. For this process, huge grindstones powered by machines are used, as shown in the picture. These stones spin at high speeds—usually about four hundred times a minute—and a constant stream of water is poured onto the area where the barrel is being ground. To prevent water from splashing all over the room, it's necessary to completely cover the grindstones with a wooden casing, as shown in the picture. So, the direct action of the stone on the barrel during grinding is hidden from view.

GRINDING. Grinding.

The workman has an iron rod with a sort of crank-like handle at the end of it, and this rod he inserts into the bore of the barrel which he has in hand. The rod fits into the barrel closely, and is held firmly by the friction, so that by means of the handle to the rod, the workman can turn the barrel round and round continually while he is grinding it, and thus bring the action of the stone to bear equally upon every part, and so finish the work in a true cylindrical form. One of these rods, with its handle, may be seen lying free upon the stand on the right of the picture. The workman is also provided with gauges which he applies frequently to the barrel at different points along its length, as the work goes on, in order to form it to the true size and to the proper taper. In the act of grinding he inserts the barrel into a small hole in the case, in front of the stone, and then presses it hard against the surface of the stone by means of the iron lever behind him. By leaning against this lever with greater or less exertion he can regulate the pressure of the barrel against the stone at pleasure. In order to increase his power over this lever he stands upon a plate of iron which is placed upon the floor beneath him, with projections cast upon it to hold his feet by their friction; the moment that he ceases to lean against the lever, the inner end of it is drawn back by the action of the weight seen hanging down by the side of it, and the barrel is immediately released.

The worker has a metal rod with a crank-like handle at the end, which he inserts into the inside of the barrel he is holding. The rod fits tightly into the barrel and is secured by friction, allowing the worker to continuously turn the barrel while grinding it. This ensures that the grinding stone evenly shapes every part of the barrel, finishing it in a perfect cylindrical form. One of these rods with its handle can be seen lying freely on the stand to the right of the image. The worker also uses gauges frequently to measure the barrel at different points along its length as he works, ensuring it is the correct size and taper. While grinding, he inserts the barrel into a small hole in the case in front of the stone and presses it firmly against the stone's surface using an iron lever behind him. By leaning against this lever with varying force, he can control how much pressure the barrel exerts against the stone. To enhance his leverage on the lever, he stands on an iron plate on the floor beneath him, which has projections to grip his feet. The moment he stops leaning against the lever, the inner end retracts due to the weight hanging beside it, releasing the barrel immediately.

The workman turns the barrel continually, during the process of grinding, by means of the handle, as seen in the drawing, and as the stone itself is revolving all the time with prodigious velocity, the work is very rapidly, and at the same time very smoothly and correctly performed.

The worker turns the barrel continuously during the grinding process using the handle shown in the drawing. Since the stone is always rotating at an incredible speed, the work is done quickly and smoothly, while also being very precise.


DANGER.

It would seem too, at first thought, that this operation of grinding must be a very safe as well as a simple one; but it is far otherwise. This grinding room is the dangerous room—the only dangerous room, in fact, in the whole establishment. In the first place, the work itself is often very injurious to the health. The premises are always drenched with water, and this makes the atmosphere damp and unwholesome. Then there is a fine powder, which, notwithstanding every precaution, will escape from the stone, and contaminate the air, producing very serious tendencies to disease in the lungs of persons who breathe it for any long period. In former times it was customary to grind bayonets as well as barrels; and this required that the face of the stone should be fluted, that is cut into grooves of a form suitable to receive the bayonet. This fluting of the stone, which of course it was necessary continually to renew, was found to be an exceedingly unhealthy operation, and in the process of grinding, moreover, in the case of bayonets, the workman was much more exposed than in grinding barrels, as it was necessary that a portion of the stone should be open before him and that he should apply the piece in hand directly to the surface of it. From these causes it resulted,[Pg 12] under the old system, that bayonets, whatever might have been their destination in respect to actual service against an enemy on the field, were pretty sure to be the death of all who were concerned in making them.

It might seem, at first glance, that the grinding process is both safe and straightforward, but that's far from the truth. This grinding room is, in fact, the only dangerous area in the entire facility. For starters, the work itself can be very harmful to health. The space is always soaked with water, creating a damp and unhealthy atmosphere. Plus, a fine powder escapes from the stone despite all precautions, contaminating the air and leading to serious lung issues for anyone who breathes it for extended periods. In the past, it was common to grind bayonets as well as barrels, which required the stone’s surface to be fluted—meaning it had to be cut into grooves suitable for the bayonet. This fluting had to be regularly replaced and proved to be an extremely unhealthy task. Additionally, when grinding bayonets, the workers were much more exposed than when grinding barrels, as a part of the stone had to remain open and the worker had to press the bayonet directly against it. As a result, under the old system, bayonets—regardless of their intended use on the battlefield—were almost guaranteed to be deadly for everyone involved in their production.

The system, however, so far as relates to the bayonet is now changed. Bayonets are now "milled," instead of being ground; that is, they are finished by means of cutters formed upon the circumference of a wheel, and so arranged that by the revolution of the wheel, and by the motion of the bayonet in passing slowly under it, secured in a very solid manner to a solid bed, the superfluous metal is cut away and the piece fashioned at once to its proper form, or at least brought so near to it by the machine, as to require afterward only a very little finishing. This operation is cheaper than the other, and also more perfect in its result; while at the same time it is entirely free from danger to the workman.

The system regarding the bayonet has changed. Bayonets are now "milled," instead of being ground. This means they are finished using cutters on the edge of a wheel. As the wheel turns and the bayonet moves slowly underneath it, secured firmly to a solid base, excess metal is removed, shaping the piece to its proper form or getting it very close, so that only minimal finishing is needed afterward. This method is cheaper and produces better results, while also being completely safe for the worker.

No mode, however, has yet been devised for dispensing with the operation of grinding in the case of the barrel; though the injury to the health is much less in this case than in the other.

No method has been created yet to avoid the grinding process when it comes to the barrel; although the harm to health is much less in this case compared to others.


BURSTING OF GRINDSTONES.

There is another very formidable danger connected with the process of grinding besides the insalubrity of the work; and that is the danger of the bursting of the stones in consequence of their enormous weight and the immense velocity with which they are made to revolve. Some years since a new method of clamping the stone, that is of attaching it and securing it to its axis, was adopted, by means of which the danger of bursting is much diminished. But by the mode formerly practiced—the mode which in fact still prevails in many manufacturing establishments where large grindstones are employed—the danger was very great, and the most frightful accidents often occurred. In securing the stone to its axis it was customary to cut a square hole through the centre of the stone, and then after passing the iron axis through this opening, to fix the stone upon the axis by wedging it up firmly with wooden wedges. Now it is well known that an enormous force may be exerted by the driving of a wedge, and probably in many cases where this method is resorted to, the stone is strained to its utmost tension, so as to be on the point of splitting open, before it is put in rotation at all. The water is then let on, and the stone becomes saturated with it—which greatly increases the danger. There are three ways by which the water tends to promote the bursting of the stone. It makes it very much heavier, and thus adds to the momentum of its motion, and consequently to the centrifugal force. It also makes it weaker, for the water penetrates the stone in every part, and operates to soften, as it were, its texture. Then finally it swells the wedges, and thus greatly increases the force of the outward strain which they exert at the centre of the stone. When under these circumstances the enormous mass is put in motion, at the rate perhaps of five or six revolutions in a[Pg 13] second, it bursts, and some enormous fragment, a quarter or a third of the whole, flies up through the flooring above, or out through a wall, according to the position of the part thrown off, at the time of the fracture. An accident of this kind occurred at the Armory some years since. One fragment of the stone struck the wall of the building, which was two or three feet thick, and broke it through. The other passing upward, struck and fractured a heavy beam forming a part of the floor above, and upset a work-bench in a room over it, where several men were working. The men were thrown down, though fortunately they were not injured. The workman who had been grinding at the stone left his station for a minute or two, just before the catastrophe, and thus his life too was saved.

There’s another serious danger associated with the grinding process besides the unhealthy conditions; that is the risk of the stones bursting due to their massive weight and the high speed at which they rotate. A few years ago, a new method was introduced to clamp the stone, which means attaching and securing it to its axis, significantly reducing the bursting risk. However, the old method—still used in many factories with large grindstones—was very risky, often leading to horrific accidents. Traditionally, to secure the stone to its axis, a square hole was cut through its center, and after inserting the iron axis, the stone was wedged tightly using wooden wedges. It’s well-known that a wedge can exert tremendous force, and in many cases, this method strains the stone to its breaking point before it even starts to spin. Water is then added, causing the stone to soak it up, which greatly increases the risk. Water promotes the stone's bursting in three ways: it makes the stone much heavier, which adds to its motion's momentum and thus the centrifugal force; it weakens the stone by penetrating it and softening its texture; and it swells the wedges, significantly increasing the outward force they exert at the stone’s center. Under these conditions, when the huge mass spins—perhaps at five or six revolutions per second—it can burst, sending a massive fragment, a quarter or a third of the stone, flying through the floor above or out through a wall, depending on where it breaks. An incident like this occurred at the Armory a few years ago. One fragment hit a two or three-foot-thick wall and broke through it. Another fragment shot upward, smashing into and fracturing a heavy beam in the floor above, knocking over a workbench where several men were working. The men were knocked down but, thankfully, weren't hurt. The worker grinding the stone had just stepped away for a minute or two right before the accident, thus saving his life too.


POLISHING.

We have said that the grinding room is the only dangerous room in such an establishment as this. There is one other process than grinding which was formerly considered as extremely unhealthy, and that is the process of polishing. The polishing of steel is performed by means of what are called emery wheels, which are wheels bound on their circumference by a band of leather, to which a coating of emery, very finely pulverized, is applied, by means of a sizing of glue. These wheels, a large number of which are placed side by side in the same room, are made to revolve by means of machinery, with an inconceivable velocity, while the workmen who have the polishing to do, taking their stations, each at his own wheel, on seats placed there for the purpose, and holding the piece of work on which the operation is to be performed, in their hands, apply it to the revolving circumference before them. The surface of the steel thus applied, receives immediately a very high polish—a stream of sparks being elicited by the friction, and flying off from the wheel opposite to the workman.

We have mentioned that the grinding room is the only dangerous room in a place like this. There’s another process besides grinding that was once thought to be very unhealthy, and that’s polishing. Polishing steel is done using what are called emery wheels, which are wheels wrapped around their edges with a leather band, onto which a fine layer of pulverized emery is applied with glue. A large number of these wheels are set up side by side in the same room and are made to spin at an incredible speed by machinery. The workers assigned to polishing take their positions on seats set up for them, holding the piece they need to work on in their hands and applying it to the rotating edge in front of them. The steel surface they work on immediately gets a high polish—sparks fly off from the wheel in front of the worker due to the friction.

Now although in these cases the workman was always accustomed to take his position at the wheel in such a manner as to be exposed as little as possible to the effects of it, yet the air of the apartment, it was found, soon became fully impregnated with the fine emery dust, and the influence of it upon the lungs proved very deleterious. There is, however, now in operation a contrivance by means of which the evil is almost entirely remedied. A large air-trunk is laid beneath the floor, from which the air is drawn out continually by means of a sort of fan machinery connected with the engine. Opposite to each wheel, and in the direction to which the sparks and the emery dust are thrown, are openings connected with this air-trunk. By means of this arrangement all that is noxious in the air of the room is drawn out through the openings into the air-trunk, and so conveyed away.

Now, even though the worker always positioned himself at the wheel to minimize exposure, the air in the room quickly became filled with fine emery dust, and this significantly harmed the lungs. However, there is now a solution in place that nearly eliminates this problem. A large air duct is installed beneath the floor, continuously pulling air out with a fan system linked to the engine. Openings are positioned opposite each wheel, in the direction where sparks and emery dust are ejected, connecting to this air duct. With this setup, all the harmful elements in the room's air are sucked through the openings into the air duct and removed.

The sparks produced in such operations as this, as in the case of the collision of flint and steel, consist of small globules of melted metal, cut off from the main mass by the force of the friction, and heated to the melting point at the[Pg 14] same time. These metallic scintillations were not supposed to be the cause of the injury that was produced by the operation of polishing, as formerly practiced. It was the dust of the emery that produced the effect, just as in the case of the grinding it was the powder of the stone, and not the fine particles of iron.

The sparks created in operations like this, similar to when flint strikes steel, are tiny droplets of melted metal that are separated from the main mass by friction and heated to their melting point at the[Pg 14]same time. These metallic flashes weren't thought to be the cause of the injuries from the polishing process as it was done in the past. It was actually the dust from the emery that caused the harm, just like with grinding, where it was the stone powder, not the fine iron particles, that had the effect.

The emery which is used in these polishing operations, as well as for a great many similar purposes in the arts, is obtained by pulverizing an exceedingly hard mineral that is found in several of the islands of the Grecian Archipelago, in the Mediterranean. In its native state it appears in the form of shapeless masses, of a blackish or bluish gray color, and it is prepared for use by being pulverized in iron mortars. When pulverized it is washed and sorted into five or six different degrees of fineness, according to the work for which it is wanted. It is used by lapidaries for cutting and polishing stones, by cutlers for iron and steel instruments, and by opticians for grinding lenses. It is ordinarily used in the manner above described, by being applied to the circumference of a leathern covered wheel, by means of oil or of glue. Ladies use bags filled with it, for brightening their needles.

The emery used in these polishing processes, as well as for many similar tasks in various trades, is made by grinding down a very hard mineral found on several islands in the Greek Archipelago in the Mediterranean. In its natural state, it appears as shapeless lumps that are blackish or bluish gray. It’s prepared for use by grinding it in iron mortars. Once ground, it’s washed and sorted into five or six different levels of fineness, depending on the intended work. Lapidaries use it for cutting and polishing stones, cutlers for iron and steel tools, and opticians for grinding lenses. Typically, it’s used by applying it to the edge of a leather-covered wheel with the help of oil or glue. Women use bags filled with it to buff their needles.

Emery is procured in Spain, and also in Great Britain, as well as in the Islands of the Mediterranean.

Emery is sourced in Spain, Great Britain, and the Mediterranean Islands.


PROVING.

THE PROVING HOUSE. THE PROVING HOUSE.

When the barrels are brought pretty nearly to their finished condition, they are to be proved, that is to be subjected to the test of actual trial with gunpowder. For this proving they are taken to a very strong building that is constructed for the purpose, and which stands behind the Stocking Shop. Its place is on the right in the general view of the Armory buildings, and near the foreground—though that view does not extend far enough in that direction to bring it in. The exterior appearance of this building is represented in the above engraving. It is made very strong, being constructed wholly of timber, in order to enable it to resist the force of the explosions within. There are spacious openings in lattice work, in the roof and under the eaves of the building, to allow of the escape of the smoke with which it is filled at each discharge; for it is customary to prove a large number of barrels at a time. The barrels are loaded with a very heavy charge, so as to subject them to much greater strain than they can ever be exposed to in actual service. The building on the left, in the engraving, is used for loading the barrels, and for cleaning and drying them after they are proved. The shed attached to the main building, on the right hand, contains a bank of clay, placed there to receive the bullets, with which the barrels are charged.

When the barrels are almost finished, they need to be proved, which means they undergo a test with gunpowder. They’re taken to a strong building built for this purpose, located behind the Stocking Shop. It's positioned to the right in the overall view of the Armory buildings, near the front—though that view doesn’t extend far enough to include it. The building’s exterior is shown in the engraving above. It's very sturdy, made entirely of timber, to withstand the force of the explosions inside. There are large lattice openings in the roof and under the eaves to let out the smoke that fills the building after each firing, as multiple barrels are typically tested at once. The barrels are loaded with a heavy charge to put them under a lot more stress than they would experience in real use. The building on the left in the engraving is for loading the barrels, as well as cleaning and drying them after proofing. The shed attached to the main building on the right holds a bank of clay, which catches the bullets used in the barrels.

The arrangement of the interior of this building, as well as the manner in which the proving is performed, will be very clearly understood by reference to the engraving below.

The layout of the inside of this building, as well as the way the proofing is done, will be easily understood by looking at the engraving below.

INTERIOR OF THE PROVING HOUSE. INSIDE THE TESTING LAB.

On the right hand end of the building, and extending quite across it from side to side, is a sort of platform, the upper surface of which is formed of cast-iron, and contains grooves in which the muskets are placed when loaded, side by side. A train of gunpowder is laid along the back side of this platform, so as to form a communication with each barrel. The train passes out through a hole in the side of the building near the door. The bank of clay may be seen sloping down from within its shed into the room on the left. The artist has represented the scene as it appears when all is ready for the discharge. The barrels are placed, the train is laid, and the proof-master is just retiring and closing the door. A moment more and there will be a loud and rattling explosion; then the doors will be opened, and as soon as the smoke has cleared away the workman will enter and ascertain the result. About one in sixty of the barrels are found to burst under the trial.

On the right side of the building, there’s a kind of platform that stretches all the way across. Its top is made of cast iron and has grooves where the loaded muskets are lined up side by side. There's a gunpowder train running along the back of this platform to connect with each barrel. The train exits through a hole in the side of the building near the door. You can see the bank of clay sloping down from its shed into the room on the left. The artist captured the scene just as everything is set for the discharge. The barrels are positioned, the train is in place, and the proof-master is just about to leave and close the door. In a moment, there will be a loud and rattling explosion; then the doors will open, and once the smoke clears, the worker will come in to check the results. About one in sixty of the barrels are found to burst during the test.

The pieces that fail are all carefully examined with a view to ascertain whether the giving way was owing to a defect in the welding, or to some flaw, or other bad quality, in the iron. The appearance of the rent made by the bursting will always determine this point. The loss of those that failed on account of bad welding is then charged to the respective operatives by whom the work was done, at a dollar for each one so failing. The name of the maker of each is known by the stamp which he put upon it at the time when it passed through his hands.

The pieces that break are all carefully examined to determine whether the failure was due to a defect in the welding, a flaw, or some other poor quality in the iron. The appearance of the break from the burst will always clarify this issue. The loss from those that broke due to bad welding is then charged to the individual workers who did the job, at a dollar for each failure. The name of the maker of each piece is identified by the stamp they placed on it when it passed through their hands.

The barrels that stand this first test are afterward subjected to a second one in order to make it sure that they sustained no partial and imperceptible injury at the first explosion. This done they are stamped with the mark of approval, and so sent to the proper departments to be mounted and finished.

The barrels that pass this first test are then put through a second one to ensure they didn’t sustain any minor and unnoticed damage in the first explosion. Once this is complete, they are stamped with an approval mark and sent to the appropriate departments for assembly and finishing.

TESTING THE BAYONETS. Testing the bayonets.

The bayonets, and all the other parts of which the musket is composed are subjected to tests, different in character indeed, but equally strict and rigid in respect to the qualities which they are intended to prove, with that applied to the barrel. The bayonet is very carefully gauged and measured in every part, in order to make sure that it is of precisely the proper form and dimensions. A weight is hung to the point of it to try its temper, and it is sprung by the strength of the inspector, with the point of it set into the floor, to prove its elasticity. If it is found to be[Pg 16] tempered too high it breaks; if too low it bends. In either case it is condemned, and the workman through whose fault the failure has resulted is charged with the loss.

The bayonets and all the other parts of the musket go through various tests that are different in nature but equally strict and rigorous regarding the qualities they are meant to confirm, similar to the testing done on the barrel. Each bayonet is carefully gauged and measured to ensure it has the correct shape and dimensions. A weight is attached to its tip to test its temper, and it is flexed by the strength of the inspector while the tip is fixed to the floor to assess its elasticity. If the temper is found to be too high, it breaks; if it’s too low, it bends. In either case, it’s rejected, and the worker responsible for the failure is held accountable for the loss.


THE FORGING.

The number of pieces which are used in making up a musket is forty-nine, each of which has to be formed and finished separately. Of these there are only two—viz., the sight and what is called the cone-seat, a sort of process connected with the barrel—that are permanently attached to any other part; so that the musket can at any time be separated into forty-seven parts, by simply turning screws, and opening springs, and then put together again as before. Most of these parts are such that they are formed in the first instance by being forged or rather swedged, and are afterward trimmed and finished in lathes, and milling engines, or by means of files. Swedging, as it is called, is the forming of irregular shapes in iron by means of dies of a certain kind, called swedges, one of which is inserted in the anvil, in a cavity made for the purpose, and the other is placed above it. Cavities are cut in the faces of the swedges, so that when they are brought together, with the end of the iron rod out of which the article to be formed between them, the iron is made to assume the form of the cavities by means of blows of the hammer upon the upper swedge. In this way shapes are easily and rapidly fashioned, which it would be impossible to produce by blows directed immediately upon the iron.

The musket is made up of forty-nine parts, each of which needs to be shaped and finished separately. Only two of these parts—the sight and the cone-seat, which is related to the barrel—are permanently attached to any other part. This means the musket can be taken apart into forty-seven pieces by just turning screws and opening springs, and then reassembled as before. Most of these parts are initially shaped by being forged or rather swedged, and then they are refined and finished using lathes, milling machines, or files. Swedging involves creating irregular shapes in iron using special dies called swedges. One swedge is placed in the anvil, in a designated cavity, and the other is positioned above it. Cavities are cut into the surfaces of the swedges so that when they are brought together with the end of the iron rod that will be shaped between them, the iron takes on the form of the cavities when the upper swedge is struck with a hammer. This method allows shapes to be created quickly and easily, which would be impossible to achieve by hitting the iron directly.

THE BLACKSMITH'S SHOP. THE BLACKSMITH SHOP.

The shop where this swedging work is done at the Armory contains a great number of forges, one only of which however is fully represented in the engraving. The apparatus connected with these forges, differing in each according to the particular operation for which each is intended, is far too complicated to be described in this connection. It can only be fully understood when seen in actual operation under the hands of the workman. The visitor however who has the opportunity to see it thus, lingers long before each separate forge, pleased with the ingenuity of the contrivances which he witnesses, and admiring the wonderful dexterity of the workman. There is no appearance of bellows at any of these works. The air is supplied to the fires by pipes ascending through the floor from a fan blower, as it is called, worked by machinery arranged for the purpose below.

The shop where this swedging work takes place at the Armory has a lot of forges, but only one of them is fully shown in the engraving. The equipment connected to these forges varies for each specific operation they’re designed for, and it’s too complex to explain here. It can only be truly understood when you see it in action, operated by the workman. However, a visitor who gets to see it like this will spend a long time in front of each forge, admiring the clever designs they see and the amazing skill of the workman. There are no bellows in any of these operations. The fire gets its air from pipes that rise through the floor from a fan blower, which is powered by machinery set up below.


THE STOCKING SHOP.

The Stocking Shop, so called, is the department in which the stocks to which the barrel and the lock are to be attached, are formed and finished. The wood used for gun stocks in this country is the black walnut, and as this wood requires to be seasoned some years before it is used, an immense store of it is kept on hand at[Pg 17] the Armory—sufficient in fact for four years' consumption. The building in which this material is stored may be seen on the right hand side in the general view placed at the head of this article. It stands off from the square, and behind the other buildings. The operations conducted in the stocking shop are exceedingly attractive to all who visit the establishment. In fact it happens here as it often does in similar cases, that that which it is most interesting to witness is the least interesting to be described. The reason is that the charm in these processes consists in the high perfection and finish of the machines, in the smoothness, grace, and rapidity of their motions, and in the seemingly miraculous character of the performances which they execute. Of such things no mere description can convey any adequate idea. They must be seen to be at all appreciated.

The Stocking Shop is the department where the gun stocks that attach to the barrel and lock are created and completed. In this country, the wood used for gun stocks is black walnut, and since this wood needs to be seasoned for several years before use, a huge supply is kept on hand at[Pg 17] the Armory—enough for about four years of use. You can see the building where this material is stored on the right side in the overview at the beginning of this article. It is set back from the square and behind the other buildings. The activities in the stocking shop are very appealing to everyone who visits the facility. In fact, much like in other situations, what is most fascinating to watch is often the most difficult to describe. The reason for this is that the allure of these processes lies in the high quality and precision of the machines, the smoothness, elegance, and speed of their movements, and in the seemingly miraculous nature of what they achieve. No plain description can truly capture the essence of these things; they need to be seen to be appreciated.

A gun stock, with all the innumerable cavities, grooves, perforations, and recesses necessary to be made in it, to receive the barrel, the lock, the bands, the ramrod, and the numerous pins and screws, all of which require a separate and peculiar modification of its form, is perhaps as irregular a shape as the ingenuity of man could devise—and as well calculated as any shape could possibly be to bid defiance to every attempt at applying machinery to the work of fashioning it. The difficulties however in the way of such an attempt, insurmountable as they would at first sight seem, have all been overcome, and every part of the stock is formed, and every perforation, groove, cavity, and socket is cut in it by machines that do their work with a beauty, a grace, and a perfection, which awaken in all who witness the process, a feeling of astonishment and delight.

A gun stock, with all its countless cavities, grooves, perforations, and recesses needed to hold the barrel, the lock, the bands, the ramrod, and the various pins and screws—each requiring a unique modification of its shape—is probably one of the most irregular shapes that human creativity could invent. It's also designed in such a way that it strongly resists any attempt to use machinery for shaping it. However, the challenges that come with such an attempt, which might initially seem overwhelming, have all been overcome. Every part of the stock is now formed, and every perforation, groove, cavity, and socket is cut by machines that work with a beauty, elegance, and perfection that leave everyone who sees the process feeling astonished and delighted.

The general principle on which this machinery operates, in doing its work, may perhaps be made intelligible to the reader by description. The action is regulated by what are called patterns. These patterns are models in iron of the various surfaces of the stock which it is intended to form. Let us suppose, for example, that the large cavity intended to receive the lock is to be cut. The stock on which the operation is to be performed is placed in its bed in the machine, and over it, pendant from a certain movable frame-work of polished steel above, is the cutting tool, a sort of bit or borer, which is to do the work. This borer is made to revolve with immense velocity, and is at the same time susceptible of various other motions at the pleasure of the workman. It may be brought down upon the work, and moved there from side to side, so as to cut out a cavity of any required shape; and such is the mechanism of the machine that these vertical and lateral motions may be made very freely without at all interfering with the swift rotation on which the cutting power of the tool depends. This is effected by causing the tool to revolve by means of small machinery within its frame, while the frame and all within it moves together in the vertical and lateral motions.

The basic principle behind how this machine works can be explained in a way that’s understandable. The operation is controlled by what are called patterns. These patterns are iron models of the various surfaces of the material that’s meant to be shaped. For instance, let’s say we want to cut out the large cavity for the lock. The material that we’re working on is placed in its position in the machine, and above it, suspended from a certain movable steel framework, is the cutting tool—essentially a bit or borer—that will do the job. This borer spins at a very high speed and can also move in different directions as needed. It can be lowered onto the material and moved side to side, enabling it to carve out a cavity in any desired shape. The machine is designed so that these vertical and side-to-side movements can occur smoothly without interrupting the fast rotation that’s essential for the cutting action. This is achieved by having the tool rotate through a small mechanism within its frame, while the frame itself and everything inside it move together in their vertical and lateral motions.

Now if this were all, it is plain that the cutting of the cavity in the stock would depend upon the action of the workman, and the form given to it would be determined by the manner in which he should guide the tool in its lateral motions, and by the depth to which he should depress it. But this is not all. At a little distance from the cutter, and parallel to it is another descending rod, which is called the guide; and this guide is so connected with the cutting tool, by means of a very complicated and ingenious machinery, that the latter is governed rigidly and exactly in all its movements by the motion of the former. Now there is placed immediately beneath the guide, what is called the pattern, that is a cavity in a block of iron of precisely the form and size which it is intended to give to the cavity in the wooden stock. All that the workman has to do therefore, when the machine is put in motion is to bring the guide down into the pattern and move it about the circumference and through the centre of it. The cutting tool imitating precisely the motions of the guide, enters the wood, and cutting its way in the most perfect manner and with incredible rapidity, forms an exact duplicate of the cavity in the pattern. The theory of this operation is sufficiently curious and striking—but the wonder excited by it is infinitely enhanced by seeing the work done. It is on this principle substantially that all the machines of the Stocking Shop are constructed; every separate recess, perforation, or groove of the piece requiring of course its own separate mechanism. The stocks are passed from one of these engines to another in rapid succession, and come out at last, each one the perfect fac-simile of its fellow.

Now, if that were all, it’s clear that shaping the cavity in the stock would depend on the worker's actions, and the shape would be determined by how he guided the tool’s lateral movements and how deep he pressed it down. But that's not everything. A little way from the cutter, and parallel to it, there’s another downward rod called the guide. This guide is connected to the cutting tool through a very complex and clever system, so the tool’s movements are strictly controlled by the guide’s movement. Right underneath the guide is what’s called the pattern, which is a cavity in a block of iron that matches exactly the shape and size intended for the cavity in the wooden stock. So, all the worker needs to do when the machine is in motion is lower the guide into the pattern and move it around the edge and through the center of it. The cutting tool, mimicking the guide’s movements, carves into the wood and creates an exact duplicate of the cavity in the pattern at an incredible speed and with perfect precision. The concept behind this operation is interesting and impressive, but watching the work being done makes it even more astonishing. It’s based on this principle that all the machines in the Stocking Shop are built; each specific recess, hole, or groove in the piece naturally requires its own unique mechanism. The stocks are quickly moved from one of these machines to another, and in the end, each one comes out being a perfect copy of the others.


DIVISION OF LABOR.

We have said that the number of separate parts which go to compose a musket is forty-nine; but this by no means denotes the number of distinct operations required in the manufacture of it—for almost every one of these forty-nine parts is subject to many distinct operations, each of which has its own name, is assigned to its own separate workman, and is paid for distinctly and by itself, according to the price put upon it in the general tariff of wages. The number of operations thus separately named, catalogued and priced, is three hundred and ninety-six.

We have stated that a musket is made up of forty-nine different parts; however, this doesn't reflect the total number of unique tasks needed to produce it—nearly every one of those forty-nine parts requires multiple distinct tasks, each with its own name, assigned to different workers, and compensated individually based on the rates in the overall wage schedule. The total number of tasks that are specifically named, listed, and priced is three hundred and ninety-six.

These operations are entirely distinct from one another—each constituting, as it were, in some sense a distinct trade, so that it might be quite possible that no one man in the whole establishment should know how to perform any two of them. It is quite certain, in fact, that no man can perform any considerable number of them. They are of very various grades in respect to character and price—from the welding of the barrel which is in some points of view the highest and most responsible of all, down to the cutting out of pins and screws of the most insignificant character. They are all however regularly rated, and the work that is performed upon them is paid for by the piece.

These operations are completely different from each other—each representing, in a way, its own unique trade, so it's entirely possible that no one person in the whole place knows how to do any two of them. In fact, it's pretty clear that no one can handle a significant number of them. They vary greatly in terms of their nature and cost—from the welding of the barrel, which is arguably the most important and serious task, down to making pins and screws that are quite trivial. However, they are all properly assessed, and the work done on them is paid per piece.


ASSEMBLING THE MUSKET.

ASSEMBLING THE MUSKET. Assembling the musket.

When the several parts are all finished, the operation of putting them together so as to make up the musket from them complete, is called "assembling the musket." The workman who performs this function has all the various parts before him at his bench, arranged in boxes and compartments, in regular order, and taking one component from this place, and another from that, he proceeds to put the complicated piece of mechanism together. His bench is fitted up expressly for the work which he is to perform upon it, with a vice to hold without marring, and rests to support without confining, and every other convenience and facility which experience and ingenuity can suggest. With these helps, and by means of the dexterity which continued practice gives him, he performs the work in a manner so adroit and rapid, as to excite the wonder of every beholder. In fact it is always a pleasure to see any thing done that is done with grace and dexterity, and this is a pleasure which the visitor to the Armory has an opportunity to enjoy at almost every turn.

When all the different parts are finished, the process of putting them together to complete the musket is called "assembling the musket." The worker who does this has all the various parts laid out on his bench, organized in boxes and compartments, in a specific order. He takes one piece from one spot and another piece from another spot, and he starts to assemble the complicated mechanism. His bench is set up specifically for this task, featuring a vice that holds without damaging and supports without constraining, along with every other tool and convenience that experience and creativity can provide. With these tools, and through the skill that comes from repeated practice, he works in a way that's so smooth and fast that it amazes everyone watching. It’s always enjoyable to see something done with skill and finesse, and this is an enjoyment that visitors to the Armory can experience at almost every turn.

The component parts of the musket are all made according to one precise pattern, and thus when taken up at random they are sure to come properly together. There is no individual fitting required in each particular case. Any barrel will fit into any stock, and a screw designed for a particular plate or band, will enter the proper hole in any plate or band of a hundred thousand. There are many advantages which result from this precise conformity to an established pattern in the components of the musket. In the first place the work of manufacturing it is more easily performed in this way. It is always the tendency of machinery to produce similarity in its results, and thus although where only two things are to be made it is very difficult to get them alike, the case is very different where there is a call for two hundred thousand. In this last case it is far easier and cheaper to have them alike than to have them different; for in manufacturing on such a scale a machinery is employed, which results in fashioning[Pg 20] every one of its products on the precise model to which the inventor adapted the construction of it. Then, besides, a great convenience and economy results from this identity of form in the component parts of the musket, when the arms are employed in service. Spare screws, locks, bands, springs, &c., can be furnished in quantities, and sent to any remote part of the country wherever they are required; so that when any part of a soldier's gun becomes injured or broken, its place can be immediately supplied by a new piece, which is sure to fit as perfectly into the vacancy as the original occupant. Even after a battle there is nothing to prevent the surviving soldiers from making up themselves, out of a hundred broken and dismantled muskets, fifty good ones as complete and sound as ever, by rejecting what is damaged, and assembling the uninjured parts anew.

The parts of the musket are all made from the same exact pattern, so when you pick them up randomly, they fit together perfectly. There’s no individual adjustment needed for each piece. Any barrel will fit any stock, and a screw made for a specific plate or band will fit the right hole in any of those plates or bands, even if there are a hundred thousand. This exact matching of parts brings many benefits to the musket. First, it makes manufacturing easier. Machines tend to produce similar results, so while it’s tough to get two items to be identical, it’s a whole different story when you need two hundred thousand. In that case, it’s much easier and cheaper to have them all the same than to have variations. Manufacturing on such a large scale uses machinery designed to shape every product to the exact model created by the inventor. Additionally, this uniformity in the musket’s parts leads to significant convenience and cost savings when the arms are in use. Spare screws, locks, bands, springs, etc., can be supplied in large quantities and sent to any remote location where they're needed. So if a soldier's gun gets damaged or broken, the missing part can be quickly replaced with a new one that fits just as well as the original. Even after a battle, surviving soldiers can put together fifty functioning muskets from the pieces of a hundred broken ones by discarding the damaged parts and reassembling the unbroken ones.

To facilitate such operations as these the mechanism by which the various parts of the musket are attached to each other and secured in their places, is studiously contrived with a view to facilitating in the highest degree the taking of them apart, and putting them together. Each soldier to whom a musket is served is provided with a little tool, which, though very simple in its construction, consists of several parts and is adapted to the performance of several functions. With the assistance of this tool the soldier sitting on the bank by the roadside, at a pause in the middle of his march, if the regulations of the service would allow him to do so, might separate his gun into its forty-seven components, and spread the parts out upon the grass around him. Then if any part was doubtful he could examine it. If any was broken he could replace it—and after having finished his inspection he could reconstruct the mechanism, and march on as before.

To make these operations easier, the way the different parts of the musket connect and are secured is carefully designed to allow for the easiest assembly and disassembly. Each soldier who receives a musket is given a small tool that, while simple in design, has several parts and can perform multiple functions. With this tool, a soldier resting by the roadside during a march, if allowed by the service's regulations, could take his gun apart into its forty-seven components and lay the pieces out on the grass around him. Then, if any part seemed questionable, he could examine it. If anything was broken, he could replace it—and once he finished his inspection, he could put the musket back together and continue marching as before.

It results from this system that to make any change, however slight, in the pattern of the musket or in the form of any of the parts of it, is attended with great difficulty and expense. The fashion and form of every one of the component portions of the arm, are very exactly and rigidly determined by the machinery that is employed in making it, and any alteration, however apparently insignificant, would require a change in this machinery. It becomes necessary, therefore, that the precise pattern both of the whole musket and of all of its parts, once fixed, should remain permanently the same.

It follows from this system that making any change, even a small one, to the design of the musket or any of its parts is very difficult and costly. The style and shape of each component of the weapon are precisely determined by the machines used to create it, and any modification, no matter how trivial it seems, would require adjustments to this machinery. Therefore, it’s essential that the exact design of both the entire musket and all its parts remains unchanged once established.

The most costly of the parts which lie before the workman in assembling the musket is the barrel. The value of it complete is three dollars. From the barrel we go down by a gradually descending scale to the piece of smallest value, which is a little wire called the ramrod spring wire—the value of which is only one mill; that is the workman is paid only one dollar a thousand for the manufacture of it. The time expended in assembling a musket is about ten minutes, and the price paid for the work is four cents.

The most expensive part that the worker has to assemble in the musket is the barrel. The complete barrel costs three dollars. From the barrel, we move down in value to the least expensive piece, which is a small wire called the ramrod spring wire—this is worth only one mill; that means the worker gets paid just one dollar for every thousand he makes. It takes about ten minutes to assemble a musket, and the worker is paid four cents for that work.


THE ARSENAL.

THE NEW ARSENAL. THE NEW ARSENAL.

The New Arsenal, which has already been alluded to in the description of the general view of the Arsenal grounds, is a very stately edifice. It is two hundred feet long, seventy feet wide, and fifty feet high. It is divided into three stories, each of which is calculated to contain one hundred thousand muskets, making three hundred thousand in all. The muskets when stored in this arsenal are arranged in racks set up for the purpose along the immense halls, where they stand upright in rows, with the glittering bayonets shooting up, as it were, above. The visitors who go into the arsenal walk up and down the aisles which separate the ranges of racks, admiring the symmetry and splendor of the display.

The New Arsenal, which has already been mentioned in the overview of the Arsenal grounds, is a grand building. It measures two hundred feet in length, seventy feet in width, and fifty feet in height. It’s divided into three stories, each capable of holding one hundred thousand muskets, totaling three hundred thousand overall. The muskets stored in this arsenal are organized in racks set up along the vast halls, standing upright in rows with the shining bayonets pointing up. Visitors to the arsenal stroll through the aisles that separate the rows of racks, admiring the symmetry and beauty of the display.

The Arsenal has another charm for visitors besides the beauty of the spectacle which the interior presents—and that is the magnificent panorama of the surrounding country, which is seen from the summit of the tower. This tower, which occupies the centre of the building, is about ninety feet high—and as it is about thirty feet square, the deck at the top furnishes space for a large party of visitors to stand and survey the surrounding country. Nothing can be imagined more enchanting than the view presented from this position in the month of June. The Armory grounds upon one side, and the streets of the town upon the other lie, as it were, at the feet of the spectator, while in the distance the broad and luxuriant valley of the Connecticut is spread out to view, with its villages, its fields,[Pg 22] its groves, its bridges, its winding railways, and its serpentine and beautiful streams.

The Arsenal has another attraction for visitors beyond the beauty of its interior, and that's the stunning view of the surrounding countryside from the top of the tower. This tower, located in the center of the building, is about ninety feet tall. Since it's around thirty feet square, the deck at the top offers enough space for a large group of visitors to stand and take in the scenery. Nothing can be more captivating than the view from this spot in June. The Armory grounds are on one side, and the town's streets lie on the other, seeming to stretch out at the visitor's feet. In the distance, the wide and lush Connecticut valley unfolds, showcasing its villages, fields, groves, bridges, winding railways, and beautiful, serpentine streams.[Pg 22]


THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE ARMORY.

QUARTERS OF THE COMMANDING OFFICER. CO'S QUARTERS.

The manufacture of muskets being a work that pertains in some sense to the operations of the army, should be, for that reason, under military rule. On the other hand, inasmuch as it is wholly a work of mechanical and peaceful industry, a civil administration would seem to be most appropriate for it. There is, in fact, a standing dispute on this subject both in relation to the Armory at Springfield and to that at Harper's Ferry, among those interested in the establishments, and it is a dispute which, perhaps, will never be finally settled. The Springfield Armory is at this time under military rule—the present commanding officer, Colonel Ripley, having been put in charge of it about ten years ago, previous to which time it was under civil superintendence. At the time of Col. Ripley's appointment the works, as is universally acknowledged, were in a very imperfect condition, compared with the present state. On entering upon the duties of his office, the new incumbent engaged in the work of improvement with great resolution and energy, and after contending for several years with the usual obstacles and difficulties which men have to encounter in efforts[Pg 23] at progress and reform, he succeeded in bringing the establishment up to a state of very high perfection; and now the order, the system, the neatness, the almost military exactness and decorum which pervade every department of the works are the theme of universal admiration. The grounds are kept in the most perfect condition—the shops are bright and cheerful, the walls and floors are every where neat and clean, the machinery and tools are perfect, and are all symmetrically and admirably arranged, while the workmen are well dressed, and are characterized by an air of manliness, intelligence, and thrift, that suggests to the mind of the visitor the idea of amateur mechanics, working with beautiful tools, for pleasure.

The production of muskets is somewhat related to military operations, so it should fall under military control. However, since it's entirely a product of mechanical and peaceful work, a civil administration might be more suitable. There’s an ongoing debate on this topic regarding both the Armory at Springfield and at Harper's Ferry among those involved, and it’s a dispute that may never be resolved. The Springfield Armory is currently under military control—the current commanding officer, Colonel Ripley, has been in charge for about ten years, and before that, it was under civil management. When Col. Ripley took over, the facilities were widely considered to be in poor shape compared to how they are now. Upon taking on his role, he dedicated himself to improving the operations with great determination and energy. After several years of facing the usual challenges that arise during efforts at progress and reform, he succeeded in elevating the establishment to a very high level of excellence. Now, the order, system, cleanliness, and almost military precision and decorum in every department are admired by all. The grounds are impeccably maintained, the shops are bright and inviting, the walls and floors are neat and clean, the machinery and tools are in perfect condition, all well-organized, and the workers are neatly dressed, exuding an air of masculinity, intelligence, and resourcefulness that makes visitors feel like they’re looking at skilled amateurs working with impressive tools just for the joy of it.

And yet the men at first complained, sometimes, of the stringency of rules and regulations required to produce these results. These rules are still in force, though now they are very generally acquiesced in. No newspapers of any kind can be taken into the shops, no tobacco or intoxicating drinks can be used there, no unnecessary conversation is allowed, and the regulations in respect to hours of attendance, and to responsibility for damaged work are very definite and strict. But even if the workmen should be disposed in any case to complain of the stringency of these requirements, they can not but be proud of the result; for they take a very evident pleasure in the gratification which every visitor manifests in witnessing the system, the order, the neatness, and the precision that every where prevail.

And yet the men initially complained, at times, about the strict rules and regulations needed to achieve these results. These rules are still in place, although now they are widely accepted. No newspapers of any kind are allowed in the shops, no tobacco or alcoholic drinks can be consumed there, and unnecessary chatter isn't permitted. The regulations regarding work hours and responsibility for damaged work are very clear and strict. However, even if the workers were inclined to complain about the strictness of these requirements, they can't help but feel proud of the outcome; they take clear pleasure in the satisfaction that every visitor shows when witnessing the system, the order, the cleanliness, and the precision that prevail everywhere.

Nothing can be more admirably planned, or more completely and precisely executed than the system of accounts kept at the offices, by which not only every pecuniary transaction, but also, as would seem, almost every mechanical operation or act that takes place throughout the establishment is made a matter of record. Thus every thing is checked and regulated. No piece, large or small, can be lost from among its hundreds of fellows without being missed somewhere in some column of figures—and the whole history of every workman's doings, and of every piece of work done, is to be found recorded. Ask the master-armorer any questions whatever about the workings of the establishment, whether relating to the minutest detail, or to most comprehensive and general results, and he takes down a book and shows you the answer in some column or table.

Nothing is more expertly organized or precisely executed than the accounting system used in the offices, which records not only every financial transaction but also, it seems, almost every mechanical operation or action that occurs throughout the establishment. This way, everything is checked and managed. No item, big or small, can go missing from among its hundreds of counterparts without being noticed somewhere in some column of numbers—and the entire history of every worker's activities and every piece of work done is documented. If you ask the master armorer any questions about how the establishment operates, whether regarding the smallest details or the most general results, he simply pulls out a book and shows you the answer in some column or table.

After all, however, this neatness, precision, and elegance in the appearance and in the daily workings of an establishment like this, though very agreeable to the eye of the observer, constitute a test of only secondary importance in respect to the actual character of the administration that governs it. To judge properly on this point, the thing to be looked at is the actual and substantial results that are obtained. The manufacture of muskets is the great function of the Armory, and not the exhibition of beautiful workshops, and curious processes in mechanics for the entertainment of visitors. When we inquire,[Pg 24] however, into the present arrangement of this establishment, in this point of view, the conclusion seems to be still more decidedly in its favor than in the other. The cost of manufacturing each musket immediately before the commencement of the term of the present commander was about seventeen dollars and a half. During the past year it has been eight dollars and three quarters, and yet the men are paid better wages now per day, or, rather, they are paid at such rates for their work, that they can earn more now per day, than then. The saving has thus not been at all made from the pay of the workmen, but wholly from the introduction of new and improved modes of manufacture, better machines, a superior degree of order, system, and economy in every department, and other similar causes. How far the improvements which have thus been made are due to the intrinsic qualities of military government, and how far to the personal efficiency of the officer in this case intrusted with the administration of it, it might be somewhat difficult to decide.

After all, this neatness, precision, and elegance in the look and daily operations of a place like this, while pleasing to the observer’s eye, are only a secondary measure of the actual quality of the management that runs it. To properly assess this, we should focus on the real and tangible outcomes achieved. The main role of the Armory is to manufacture muskets, not to showcase beautiful workshops or interesting mechanical processes for visitors’ entertainment. However, when we look into the current setup of this establishment from this perspective, the conclusion appears even more favorable than the other aspects. The cost to produce each musket just before the current commander took over was about seventeen and a half dollars. Over the past year, that cost has dropped to eight dollars and seventy-five cents, and the workers are actually earning better daily wages now—they can earn more each day than they could back then. This savings hasn't come from cutting workers' pay but entirely from adopting new and improved production methods, better machines, greater order, system, and efficiency in every area, and other similar factors. It might be somewhat challenging to determine how much of the improvements made are due to the inherent qualities of military governance and how much is attributed to the personal effectiveness of the officer currently in charge.

In fact, when judging of the advancement made during a period of ten years, in an establishment of this kind, at the present age of the world, some considerable portion of the improvement that is manifested is due, doubtless, to the operation of those causes which are producing a general progress in all the arts and functions of social life. The tendency of every thing is onward. Every where, and for all purposes, machinery is improving, materials are more and more easily procured, new facilities are discovered and new inventions are made, the results of which inure to the common benefit of all mankind. It is only so far as an establishment like the Armory advances at a more rapid rate than that of the general progress of the age, that any special credit is due to those who administer its affairs. It always seems, however, to strangers visiting the Armory and observing its condition, that these general causes will account for but a small portion of the results which have been attained in the management of it, during the past ten years.

In fact, when evaluating the progress made over a ten-year period in an establishment like this, in today's world, a significant part of the improvement seen is undoubtedly due to the forces driving general advancement in all areas of arts and social functions. Everything is moving forward. Everywhere and for all purposes, machinery is getting better, materials are more readily available, new opportunities are found, and new inventions are created, all of which benefit humanity as a whole. Only to the extent that an establishment like the Armory progresses faster than the overall advancements of the time is any particular credit deserved by those managing it. However, visitors to the Armory often feel that these general factors can only explain a small portion of the achievements made in its management over the past ten years.


CONCLUSION.

As was stated at the commencement of the article, it is only a small part of the hundreds of thousands of muskets manufactured, that are destined ever to be used. Some portion of the whole number are served out to the army, and are employed in Indian warfare, others are destined to arm garrisons in various fortresses and military posts, where they are never called to any other service than to figure in peaceful drillings and parades. Far the greater portion, however, are sent away to various parts of the country, to be stored in the national arsenals, where they lie, and are to lie, as we hope, forever, undisturbed, in the midst of scenes of rural beauty and continued peace. The flowers bloom and the birds sing unmolested around the silent and solitary depositories, where these terrible instruments of carnage and destruction unconsciously and forever repose.

As mentioned at the beginning of the article, only a small fraction of the hundreds of thousands of muskets made will ever be used. Some of them are issued to the army for Indian warfare, while others are meant to arm garrisons at various forts and military posts, where they are only used for drills and parades. However, the vast majority are sent to different parts of the country to be stored in national arsenals, where they will hopefully remain forever undisturbed, surrounded by beautiful rural scenery and ongoing peace. Flowers bloom and birds sing freely around the silent and lonely storage sites, where these deadly weapons of war rest quietly and permanently.


NAPOLEON BONAPARTE.[A]
BY JOHN S. C. ABBOTT.

PEACE WITH ENGLAND.

It was the first great object of Napoleon, immediately upon his accession to power, to reconcile France with Europe, and to make peace with all the world. France was weary of war. She needed repose, to recover from the turmoil of revolution. Napoleon, conscious of the necessities of France, was consecrating Herculean energies for the promotion of peace. The Directory, by oppressive acts, had excited the indignation of the United States. Napoleon, by a course of conciliation, immediately removed that hostility, and, but a short time before the treaty of Luneville, ratified a treaty of amity between France and the United States. The signature of this treaty was celebrated with great rejoicings at the beautiful country seat which Joseph, who in consequence of his marriage was richer than his brother, had purchased at Morfontaine. Napoleon, accompanied by a brilliant party, met the American commissioners there. The most elegant decorations within the mansion and in the gardens, represented France and America joined in friendly union. Napoleon presented the following toast: "The memory of the French and the Americans who died on the field of battle for the independence of the New World." Lebrun, the Second Consul, proposed, "The union of America with the Northern powers, to enforce respect for the liberty of the seas." Cambaceres gave for the third toast, "The successor of Washington." Thus did Napoleon endeavor to secure the friendship of the United States.

It was Napoleon's primary goal, right after he took power, to reconcile France with Europe and establish peace with the world. France was tired of war and needed a break to recover from the chaos of the revolution. Aware of France's needs, Napoleon dedicated immense effort to promoting peace. The Directory's harsh actions had angered the United States, but Napoleon quickly eased that tension through diplomacy and, shortly before the Treaty of Luneville, ratified a friendship treaty between France and the United States. The signing of this treaty was celebrated with great festivities at the beautiful estate that Joseph had purchased at Morfontaine after his marriage made him wealthier than his brother. Napoleon, joined by a glamorous group, welcomed the American commissioners there. The most exquisite decorations in the mansion and gardens symbolized the friendly alliance between France and America. Napoleon proposed the following toast: "To the memory of the French and Americans who gave their lives for the independence of the New World." Lebrun, the Second Consul, toasted, "To the union of America with the Northern powers, to uphold respect for the freedom of the seas." Cambaceres offered the third toast, "To the successor of Washington." This was Napoleon's way of attempting to secure the friendship of the United States.

About this time Pope Pius VI. died, and the Cardinals met to choose his successor. The respect with which Napoleon had treated the Pope, and his kindness to the emigrant priests, during the first Italian campaign, presented so strong a contrast with the violence enjoined by the Directory, as to produce a profound impression upon the minds of the Pope and the Cardinals.

About this time, Pope Pius VI died, and the Cardinals gathered to choose his successor. The respect that Napoleon had shown to the Pope and his kindness to the exiled priests during the first Italian campaign created such a strong contrast with the violence ordered by the Directory that it left a deep impression on the minds of the Pope and the Cardinals.

The Bishop of Imola was universally esteemed for his extensive learning, his gentle virtues, and his firm probity. Upon the occasion of the union of his diocese with the Cisalpine Republic, he preached a very celebrated sermon, in which he spoke of the conduct of the French in terms highly gratifying to the young conqueror. The power of Napoleon was now in the ascendant. It was deemed important to conciliate his favor. "It is from France," said Cardinal Gonsalvi, "that persecutions have come upon us for the last ten years. It is from France, perhaps, that we shall derive aid and consolation for the future. A very extraordinary young man, one very difficult as yet to judge, holds dominion there at the present day. His influence will soon be paramount in Italy. Remember that he protected the priests in 1797. He has recently conferred funeral honors upon Pius VI." These[Pg 26] were words of deep foresight. They were appreciated by the sagacious Cardinals. To conciliate the favor of Napoleon, the Bishop of Imola was elected to the pontifical chair as Pope Pius VII.

The Bishop of Imola was highly respected for his vast knowledge, kind character, and strong integrity. When his diocese joined the Cisalpine Republic, he delivered a notable sermon where he praised the behavior of the French, which pleased the young conqueror. Napoleon's power was on the rise, and gaining his favor was seen as important. "It is from France," said Cardinal Gonsalvi, "that we've faced persecutions over the last ten years. It might also be from France that we find help and comfort in the future. There’s a very exceptional young man in charge there now, and it's hard to make a judgment about him yet. His influence will soon be dominant in Italy. Remember, he supported the priests back in 1797. He recently honored Pius VI with funeral rites." These[Pg 26] words were insightful and recognized by the wise Cardinals. To win Napoleon's favor, the Bishop of Imola was elected as Pope Pius VII.

Naples had been most perfidious in its hostility to France. The Queen of Naples was a proud daughter of Maria Theresa, and sister of the Emperor of Austria and of the unfortunate Marie Antoinette. She surely must not be too severely condemned for execrating a revolution which had consigned her sister to the dungeon and to the guillotine. Naples, deprived of Austrian aid, was powerless. She trembled under apprehension of the vengeance of Napoleon. The King of Austria could no longer render his sister any assistance. She adopted the decisive and romantic expedient of proceeding in person, notwithstanding the rigor of the approaching winter, to St. Petersburg, to implore the intercession of the Emperor Paul. The eccentric monarch, flattered by the supplication of the beautiful queen, immediately espoused her cause, and dispatched a messenger to Napoleon, soliciting him, as a personal favor, to deal gently with Naples. The occurrence was, of course, a triumph and a gratification to Napoleon. Most promptly and courteously he responded to the appeal. It was indeed his constant study at this time, to arrest the further progress of the revolution, to establish the interests of France upon a basis of order and of law, and to conciliate the surrounding monarchies, by proving to them that he had no disposition to revolutionize their realms. A word from him would have driven the King and Queen of Naples into exile, and would have converted their kingdom into a republic. But Napoleon refused to utter that word, and sustained the King of Naples upon his throne.

Naples had been really deceitful in its hostility toward France. The Queen of Naples was a proud daughter of Maria Theresa and sister to the Emperor of Austria and the unfortunate Marie Antoinette. She shouldn’t be too harshly judged for hating a revolution that had sent her sister to prison and the guillotine. Naples, lacking Austrian support, was powerless. She was anxious about Napoleon’s revenge. The King of Austria could no longer help his sister. In a bold and dramatic move, she decided to personally travel to St. Petersburg, despite the harsh winter approaching, to ask Emperor Paul for help. The unusual ruler, flattered by the beautiful queen's plea, quickly took up her cause and sent a messenger to Napoleon, asking him as a personal favor to treat Naples gently. This was, of course, a victory and a satisfaction for Napoleon. He promptly and politely responded to her request. At that time, it was his main goal to stop the further spread of the revolution, to secure France's interests on a foundation of order and law, and to reassure the neighboring monarchies that he wasn’t trying to overthrow their governments. A single word from him could have sent the King and Queen of Naples into exile and turned their kingdom into a republic. But Napoleon chose not to say that word and supported the King of Naples on his throne.

The Duke of Parma, brother of the King of Spain, had, through the intercession of Napoleon, obtained the exchange of his duchy, for the beautiful province of Tuscany. The First Consul had also erected Tuscany into the kingdom of Etruria, containing about one million of inhabitants. The old duke, a bigoted prince, inimical to all reform, had married his son (a feeble, frivolous young man) to the daughter of his brother, the King of Spain. The kingdom of Etruria was intended for this youthful pair. Napoleon, as yet but thirty years of age, thus found himself forming kingdoms and creating kings. The young couple were in haste to ascend the throne. They could not, however, do this until the Duke of Parma should die or abdicate. The unaccommodating old duke refused to do either. Napoleon, desirous of producing a moral impression in Paris, was anxious to crown them. He therefore allowed the duke to retain Parma until his death, that his son might be placed upon the throne of Etruria. He wished to exhibit the spectacle, in the regicide metropolis of France, of a king created and enthroned by France. Thus he hoped to diminish the antipathy to kings, and to prepare the way for that restoration of the monarchical power which he[Pg 27] contemplated. He would also thus conciliate monarchical Europe, by proving that he had no design of overthrowing every kingly throne. It was indeed adroitly done. He required, therefore, the youthful princes to come to Paris, to accept the crown from his hands, as in ancient Rome vassal monarchs received the sceptre from the Cæsars. The young candidates for monarchy left Madrid, and repaired to the Tuileries, to be placed upon the throne by the First Consul. This measure had two aspects, each exceedingly striking. It frowned upon the hostility of the people to royalty, and it silenced the clamor against France, as seeking to spread democracy over the ruins of all thrones. It also proudly said, in tones which must have been excessively annoying to the haughty legitimists of Europe, "You kings must be childlike and humble. You see that I can create such beings as you are." Napoleon, conscious that his glory elevated him far above the ancient dynasty, whose station he occupied, was happy to receive the young princes with pomp and splendor. The versatile Parisians, ever delighted with novelty, forgot the twelve years of bloody revolutions, which had overturned so many thrones, and recognizing, in this strange spectacle, the fruits of their victories, and the triumph of their cause, shouted most enthusiastically, "Long live the king!" The royalists, on the other hand, chagrined and sullen, answered passionately, "Down with kings!" Strange reverse! yet how natural! Each party must have been surprised and bewildered at its own novel position. In settling the etiquette of this visit, it was decided that the young princes should call first upon Napoleon, and that he should return their call the next day. The First Consul, at the head of his brilliant military staff, received the young monarch with parental kindness and with the most delicate attentions, yet with the universally recognized superiorities of power and glory. The princes were entertained at the magnificent chateau of Talleyrand at Neuilly, with most brilliant festivals and illuminations. For a month the capital presented a scene of most gorgeous spectacles. Napoleon, too entirely engrossed with the cares of empire to devote much time to these amusements, assigned the entertainment of his guests to his ministers. Nevertheless he endeavored to give some advice to the young couple about to reign over Etruria. He was much struck with the weakness of the prince, who cherished no sense of responsibility, and was entirely devoted to trivial pleasures. He was exceedingly interested in the mysteries of cotillions, of leap-frog, and of hide-and-go-seek—and was ever thus trifling with the courtiers. Napoleon saw that he was perfectly incapable of governing, and said to one of his ministers, "You perceive that they are princes, descended from an ancient line. How can the reins of government be intrusted to such hands? But it was well to show to France this specimen of the Bourbons. She can judge if these ancient dynasties are equal to the difficulties of an age like ours." As the young king[Pg 28] left Paris for his dominions, Napoleon remarked to a friend, "Rome need not be uneasy. There is no danger of his crossing the Rubicon." Napoleon sent one of his generals to Etruria with the royal pair, ostensibly as the minister of France, but in reality as the viceroy of the First Consul. The feeble monarch desired only the rank and splendor of a king, and was glad to be released from the cares of empire. Of all the proud acts performed by Napoleon during his extraordinary career, this creation of the Etruscan king, when viewed in all its aspects, was perhaps the proudest.

The Duke of Parma, brother of the King of Spain, had, through Napoleon’s intervention, secured the exchange of his duchy for the beautiful province of Tuscany. The First Consul also established Tuscany as the Kingdom of Etruria, home to about one million people. The old duke, a staunch traditionalist against any reform, had married his son (a weak, frivolous young man) to his brother's daughter, the King of Spain. This kingdom of Etruria was meant for the young couple. At just thirty years old, Napoleon found himself creating kingdoms and naming kings. The young couple was eager to take the throne, but they couldn’t do so until the Duke of Parma either died or stepped down. The stubborn old duke refused to do either. Wanting to create a positive impression in Paris, Napoleon was keen to crown them. He allowed the duke to keep Parma until his death, so his son could ascend to the throne of Etruria. He aimed to showcase in France, the epicenter of regicide, a king created and crowned by France. He hoped this would lessen the antipathy towards kings and pave the way for the restoration of monarchical power he envisioned. He also aimed to appease the monarchies of Europe by demonstrating he didn’t intend to overthrow every royal throne. It was indeed a clever maneuver. Consequently, he required the young princes to come to Paris to accept the crown from him, much like vassal monarchs received their scepters from the emperors of ancient Rome. The young royal candidates left Madrid and headed to the Tuileries to be crowned by the First Consul. This initiative had two significant aspects: it challenged the public's anti-royalist sentiment and silenced criticism of France’s supposed mission to spread democracy at the expense of all thrones. It also boldly proclaimed, in a manner likely infuriating the proud legitimists of Europe, "You kings must be innocent and humble. See, I can create leaders like you." Napoleon, aware that his own glory surpassed that of the old dynasty he represented, welcomed the young princes with grandiosity and elegance. The ever-changing Parisians, always drawn to novelty, overlooked the twelve years of bloody revolutions that had toppled so many thrones and, recognizing in this unusual event the results of their triumphs and struggles, enthusiastically shouted, "Long live the king!" The royalists, however, were frustrated and bitter, responding passionately, "Down with kings!" A strange reversal! Yet, how natural! Each group must have been taken aback by their new roles. In organizing the protocol for this visit, it was decided that the young princes would first pay a visit to Napoleon, who would return the favor the following day. The First Consul, accompanied by his impressive military staff, greeted the young monarch with fatherly warmth and the utmost attention while maintaining the recognized superiority of his power and stature. The princes were hosted at the lavish chateau of Talleyrand in Neuilly, enjoying extravagant celebrations and illuminations. For a month, the capital was filled with magnificent displays. Napoleon, too busy with the responsibilities of running an empire to engage fully in the festivities, delegated the entertainment of his guests to his ministers. Still, he made an effort to offer some advice to the young couple set to rule Etruria. He was struck by the prince's lack of responsibility, as he was engrossed in trivial pleasures. He showed a keen interest in the subtleties of dances, games of leapfrog, and hide-and-seek, and spent much time goofing around with the courtiers. Napoleon realized he was entirely unfit to govern and remarked to one of his ministers, "You see, they are princes descended from an old line. How can we trust such hands with governance? But it was wise to show France this sample of the Bourbons. She can judge if these ancient dynasties are capable of dealing with the challenges of our time." As the young king left Paris for his kingdom, Napoleon told a friend, "Rome need not worry. There’s no chance of him crossing the Rubicon." Napoleon dispatched one of his generals to Etruria with the royal couple, officially as a minister of France but truly as the First Consul's viceroy. The weak monarch only coveted the title and luxury of a king, relieved to be freed from the burdens of governance. Among all the bold actions taken by Napoleon throughout his remarkable career, the creation of the Etruscan king was perhaps his proudest achievement.

Madame de Montesson had become the guilty paramour of the Duke of Orleans, grandfather of Louis Phillipe. She was not at all ashamed of this relation, which was sanctioned by the licentiousness of the times. Proud even of this alliance with a prince of the blood, she fancied that it was her privilege, as the only relative of the royal line then in Paris, to pay to the King and Queen of Etruria such honors as they might be gratified in receiving from the remains of the old court society. She therefore made a brilliant party, inviting all the returned emigrants of illustrious birth. She even had the boldness to invite the family of the First Consul, and the distinguished persons of his suite. The invitation was concealed from Napoleon, as his determination to frown upon all immorality was well known. The next morning Napoleon heard of the occurrence, and severely reprimanded those of his suite who had attended the party, dwelling with great warmth upon the impropriety of countenancing vice in high places. Savary, who attended the party, and shared in the reprimand, says, that Madame de Montesson would have been severely punished had it not been for the intervention of Josephine, who was ever ready to plead for mercy.

Madame de Montesson had become the guilty lover of the Duke of Orleans, grandfather of Louis Philippe. She wasn’t ashamed of this relationship, which was accepted during those times. Proud of this connection with a royal, she believed it was her privilege, as the only relative of the royal line still in Paris, to pay the King and Queen of Etruria the respects they would appreciate from the remnants of the old court society. So, she threw a lavish party, inviting all the returned aristocrats. She even had the audacity to invite the family of the First Consul and the notable members of his entourage. The invitation was kept from Napoleon because his stance against all immorality was well known. The next morning, Napoleon learned about the event and harshly reprimanded those in his entourage who attended, emphasizing the inappropriateness of supporting vice among the high-ranking. Savary, who was at the party and faced the reprimand, noted that Madame de Montesson would have faced severe consequences had it not been for Josephine's intervention, as she was always eager to advocate for mercy.

Napoleon having made peace with continental Europe, now turned his attention earnestly to England, that he might compel that unrelenting antagonist to lay down her arms. "France," said he, "will not reap all the blessings of a pacification, until she shall have a peace with England. But a sort of delirium has seized on that government, which now holds nothing sacred. Its conduct is unjust, not only toward the French people, but toward all the other powers of the Continent. And when governments are not just their authority is short-lived. All the continental powers must force England to fall back into the track of moderation, of equity, and of reason." Notwithstanding this state of hostilities it is pleasant to witness the interchange of the courtesy of letters. Early in January of 1801, Napoleon sent some very valuable works, magnificently bound, as a present to the Royal Society of London. A complimentary letter accompanied the present, signed—Bonaparte, President of the National Institute, and First Consul of France. As a significant intimation of his principles, there was on the letter a finely-executed vignette, representing Liberty sailing on the ocean in an open shell with the following motto:

Napoleon, having made peace with continental Europe, now focused intently on England, aiming to force that relentless adversary to surrender. "France," he stated, "won't enjoy all the benefits of peace until we have a settlement with England. But that government seems to be in a sort of frenzy and holds nothing sacred. Its actions are unjust, not just toward the French people, but toward all the other powers on the Continent. And when governments act unjustly, their authority doesn't last long. All the continental powers must push England back into a path of moderation, fairness, and reason." Despite this state of hostilities, it's nice to see the exchange of courteous letters. In early January 1801, Napoleon sent some valuable, beautifully bound books as a gift to the Royal Society of London. A complimentary letter came with the gift, signed—Napoleon Bonaparte, President of the National Institute, and First Consul of France. As a significant indication of his principles, the letter featured a beautifully crafted vignette depicting Liberty sailing on the ocean in an open shell with the following motto:

"freedom of the seas." [Pg 29]

England claimed the right of visiting and searching merchant ships, to whatever nation belonging, whatever the cargoes, wherever the destination. For any resistance of this right, she enforced the penalty of the confiscation of both ship and cargo. She asserted that nothing was necessary to constitute a blockade but to announce the fact, and to station a vessel to cruise before a blockaded port. Thus all the nations of the world were forbidden by England to approach a port of France. The English government strenuously contended that these principles were in accordance with the established regulations of maritime law. The neutral powers, on the other hand, affirmed that these demands were an usurpation on the part of England, founded on power, unsanctioned by the usages of nations, or by the principles of maritime jurisprudence. "Free ships," said they, "make free goods. The flag covers the merchandise. A port is to be considered blockaded only when such a force is stationed at its mouth as renders it dangerous to enter."

England claimed the right to visit and search merchant ships, regardless of their nationality, cargo, or destination. If anyone resisted this right, England imposed penalties that included confiscating both the ship and its cargo. They argued that all that was needed to declare a blockade was to announce it and position a vessel to patrol outside a blockaded port. As a result, England forbade all nations from approaching French ports. The English government confidently asserted that these principles were aligned with established maritime law. In contrast, neutral powers argued that these demands were an overreach by England, based on power and not backed by international norms or maritime law principles. They stated, "Free ships make free goods. The flag protects the merchandise. A port should be considered blockaded only when there is enough force stationed at its entrance to make it dangerous to enter."

Under these circumstances, it was not very difficult for Napoleon to turn the arms of the united world against his most powerful foe. England had allied all the powers of Europe against France. Now Napoleon combined them all in friendly alliance with him, and directed their energies against his unyielding and unintimidated assailant. England was mistress of the seas. Upon that element she was more powerful than all Europe united. It was one great object of the British ministry to prevent any European power from becoming the maritime rival of England. Napoleon, as he cast his eye over his magnificent empire of forty millions of inhabitants, and surveyed his invincible armies, was excessively annoyed that the fifteen millions of people, crowded into the little island of England, should have undisputed dominion over the whole wide world of waters. The English have ever been respected, above all other nations, for wealth, power, courage, intelligence, and all stern virtues; but they never have been beloved. The English nation is at the present moment the most powerful, the most respected, and the most unpopular upon the surface of the globe. Providence deals in compensations. It is perhaps unreasonable to expect that all the virtues should be centred in one people. "When," exclaimed Napoleon, "will the French exchange their vanity for a little pride?" It may be rejoined, "When will the English lay aside their pride for a little vanity—that perhaps more ignoble, but certainly better-natured foible?" England, abandoned by all her allies, continued the war, apparently because her pride revolted at the idea of being conquered into a peace. And in truth England had not been vanquished at all. Her fleets were every where triumphant. The blows of Napoleon, which fell with such terrible severity upon her allies, could not reach her floating batteries. The genius of Napoleon overshadowed the land. The genius of Pitt swept the seas. The commerce of France was entirely annihilated. The English navy, in[Pg 30] the utter destitution of nobler game, even pursued poor French fishermen, and took away their haddock and their cod. The verdict of history will probably pronounce that this was at least a less magnificent rapacity than to despoil regal and ducal galleries of the statues of Phidias and the cartoons of Raphael.

Under these circumstances, it wasn't very hard for Napoleon to turn the united world's forces against his strongest opponent. England had formed alliances with all the powers of Europe against France. Now, Napoleon brought them all together in a friendly alliance with him and focused their efforts against his relentless and fearless adversary. England ruled the seas. On that front, she was more powerful than all of Europe combined. One major goal of the British government was to prevent any European power from becoming a maritime rival to England. As Napoleon surveyed his magnificent empire of forty million people and looked over his unbeatable armies, he was extremely frustrated that the fifteen million people living on the small island of England held unquestioned control over the entire vast ocean. The English have always been respected more than any other nation for their wealth, power, courage, intelligence, and other stern virtues; however, they have never been loved. The English nation is currently the most powerful, the most respected, and the most unpopular on the surface of the globe. Providence balances things out. It's perhaps unreasonable to expect all virtues to be found in one people. "When," Napoleon exclaimed, "will the French swap their vanity for a little pride?" It can be retorted, "When will the English put aside their pride for a little vanity—that possibly less noble, but certainly more good-natured flaw?" England, deserted by all her allies, continued the war, seemingly because her pride couldn't bear the thought of being forced into peace. In truth, England hadn't been defeated at all. Her fleets were triumphant everywhere. The blows of Napoleon, which landed heavily on her allies, couldn't reach her naval forces. The genius of Napoleon dominated the land. The genius of Pitt ruled the seas. The commerce of France was completely destroyed. The English navy, lacking nobler targets, even went after poor French fishermen and took away their haddock and cod. The judgment of history will likely conclude that this was at least a less grand form of greed than looting royal and noble collections of the statues of Phidias and the cartoons of Raphael.

England declared France to be in a state of blockade, and forbade all the rest of the world from having any commercial intercourse with her. Her invincible fleet swept all seas. Wherever an English frigate encountered any merchant ship, belonging to whatever nation, a shot was fired across her bows as a very emphatic command to stop. If the command was unheeded a broadside followed, and the peaceful merchantman became lawful prize. If the vessel stopped, a boat was launched from the frigate, a young lieutenant ascended the sides of the merchantman, demanded of the captain the papers, and searched the ship. If he found on board any goods which he judged to belong to France, he took them away. If he could find any goods which he could consider as munitions of war, and which in his judgment the ship was conveying to France, the merchantman, with all its contents was confiscated. Young lieutenants in the navy are not proverbial for wasting many words in compliments. They were often overbearing and insolent. England contended that these were the established principles of maritime law. All the nations of Europe, now at peace with France, excessively annoyed at this right of search, which was rigorously enforced, declared it to be an intolerable usurpation on the part of England. Russia, Prussia, Denmark, Sweden, Holland, France, and Spain united in a great confederacy to resist these demands of the proud monarch of the seas. The genius of Napoleon formed this grand coalition. Paul of Russia, now a most enthusiastic admirer of the First Consul, entered into it with all his soul. England soon found herself single-handed against the world in arms. With sublime energy the British ministry collected their strength for the conflict. Murmurs, however, and remonstrances loud and deep pervaded all England. The opposition roused itself to new vigor. The government, in the prosecution of this war, had already involved the nation in a debt of millions upon millions. But the pride of the English government was aroused. "What! make peace upon compulsion!" England was conscious of her maritime power, and feared not the hostility of the world. And the world presented a wide field from which to collect remuneration for her losses. She swept the ocean triumphantly. The colonies of the allies dropped into her hand, like fruit from the overladen bough. Immediately upon the formation of this confederacy, England issued an embargo upon every vessel belonging to the allied powers, and also orders were issued for the immediate capture of any merchant vessels, belonging to these powers, wherever they could be found. The ocean instantly swarmed with English privateersmen.[Pg 31] Her navy was active every where. There had been no proclamation of war issued. The merchants of Europe were entirely unsuspicious of any such calamity. Their ships were all exposed. By thousands they were swept into the ports of England. More than half of the ships, belonging to the northern powers, then at sea, were captured.

England declared France to be under blockade and prohibited the rest of the world from trading with her. Its unbeatable fleet patrolled all the seas. Whenever an English frigate spotted any merchant ship, no matter the nation, a shot was fired across her bows as a clear order to stop. If the order was ignored, a broadside followed, and the peaceful merchant ship became a lawful prize. If the vessel stopped, a boat was launched from the frigate, a young lieutenant climbed aboard the merchant ship, asked the captain for the papers, and searched the vessel. If he discovered any goods he deemed to belong to France, he confiscated them. If he found any goods he could consider munitions of war that the ship was transporting to France, the merchant ship and all its contents were seized. Young naval lieutenants are not known for their polite manners. They were often arrogant and disrespectful. England claimed that these actions were based on established maritime law. All the peaceably aligned European nations were extremely irritated by this 'right of search,' which was strictly enforced, and declared it to be an outrageous usurpation by England. Russia, Prussia, Denmark, Sweden, Holland, France, and Spain formed a major alliance to resist the demands of the proud monarch of the seas. The genius of Napoleon created this grand coalition. Paul of Russia, now a devoted admirer of the First Consul, wholeheartedly joined in. England soon found itself fighting alone against the rest of the world. With great determination, the British government gathered its strength for the conflict. However, deep and loud complaints filled all of England. The opposition mobilized with renewed energy. The government's pursuit of this war had already thrown the nation into debt by millions. But the pride of the English government was stirred. "What! Make peace under pressure!" England was aware of its maritime power and did not fear the world's hostility. And the world provided a vast opportunity to recover its losses. It dominated the ocean triumphantly. The colonies of the allies fell into its hands, like fruit from a heavy branch. Immediately upon forming this alliance, England imposed an embargo on all vessels belonging to the allied powers and ordered the immediate capture of any merchant vessels from those powers wherever they could be found. The ocean quickly filled with English privateers.[Pg 31] Her navy was active everywhere. No declaration of war had been made. The merchants of Europe were completely unaware of such disaster. Their ships were all vulnerable. By the thousands, they were drawn into England's ports. More than half of the ships belonging to the northern powers at sea were captured.

Russia, Denmark, and Sweden, had a large armament in the Baltic. A powerful English fleet was sent for its destruction. The terrible energies of Nelson, so resplendent at Aboukir, were still more resplendent at Copenhagen. A terrific conflict ensued. The capital of Denmark was filled with weeping and woe, for thousands of her most noble sons, the young and the joyous, were weltering in blood. "I have been," said Nelson, "in above a hundred engagements; but that of Copenhagen was the most terrible of them all."

Russia, Denmark, and Sweden had a large military presence in the Baltic. A powerful English fleet was dispatched to destroy it. The incredible power of Nelson, which shone brightly at Aboukir, was even more evident at Copenhagen. A fierce battle broke out. The capital of Denmark was filled with sorrow and grief, as thousands of its noble sons, the young and the joyful, were drowning in blood. "I have been," Nelson said, "in over a hundred battles; but the one at Copenhagen was the most terrifying of all."

In the midst of this terrific cannonade, Nelson was rapidly walking the quarter-deck, which was slippery with blood and covered with the dead, who could not be removed as fast as they fell. A heavy shot struck the main-mast, scattering the splinters in every direction. He looked upon the devastation around him, and, sternly smiling, said, "This is warm work, and this day may be the last to any of us in a moment. But mark me, I would not be elsewhere for thousands." This was heroic, but it was not noble. It was the love of war, not the love of humanity. It was the spirit of an Indian chieftain, not the spirit of a Christian Washington. The commander-in-chief of the squadron, seeing the appalling carnage, hung out the signal for discontinuing the action. Nelson was for a moment deeply agitated, and then exclaimed to a companion, "I have but one eye. I have a right to be blind sometimes." Then, putting the glass to his blind eye, he said, "I really don't see the signal. Keep mine for closer battle still flying. That is the way I answer such signals. Nail mine to the mast." The human mind is so constituted that it must admire heroism. That sentiment is implanted in every generous breast for some good purpose. Welmoes, a gallant young Dane, but seventeen years of age, stationed himself on a small raft, carrying six guns with twenty-four men, directly under the bows of Nelson's ship. The unprotected raft was swept by an incessant storm of bullets from the English marines. Knee deep in the dead this fearless stripling continued to keep up his fire to the close of the conflict. The next day, Nelson met him at a repast at the palace. Admiring the gallantry of his youthful enemy, he embraced him with enthusiasm, exclaiming to the Crown Prince, "He deserves to be made an admiral." "Were I to make all my brave officers admirals," replied the Prince, "I should have no captains or lieutenants in my service."

In the middle of this intense cannon fire, Nelson was quickly walking the quarter-deck, which was slick with blood and strewn with the dead, who couldn't be removed as fast as they fell. A heavy shot hit the main mast, scattering splinters everywhere. He looked at the destruction around him and, with a stern smile, said, "This is intense work, and this day may be the last for any of us at any moment. But believe me, I wouldn’t want to be anywhere else for thousands." This was heroic, but it wasn’t noble. It was the love of war, not the love of humanity. It reflected the spirit of an Indian chief, not the spirit of a Christian Washington. The commander-in-chief of the squadron, witnessing the shocking carnage, signaled to stop the action. Nelson was momentarily shaken and then said to a companion, "I have only one eye. I have the right to be blind sometimes." Then, putting the telescope to his blind eye, he added, "I really can’t see the signal. Keep mine for closer battle still flying. That’s how I respond to such signals. Nail mine to the mast." The human mind is built to admire heroism. That feeling is planted in every generous heart for good reason. Welmoes, a brave young Dane, just seventeen years old, positioned himself on a small raft with six guns manned by twenty-four men, right under the bows of Nelson's ship. The unprotected raft was bombarded by a constant stream of bullets from the English marines. Knee-deep in the fallen, this fearless youth kept up his fire until the end of the battle. The next day, Nelson met him at a meal at the palace. Admiring the bravery of his young opponent, he embraced him enthusiastically, telling the Crown Prince, "He deserves to be made an admiral." "If I were to make all my brave officers admirals," replied the Prince, "I wouldn’t have any captains or lieutenants in my service."

By this battle the power of the confederacy was broken. At the same time, the Emperor Paul was assassinated in his palace, by his nobles, and Alexander, his son, ascended the[Pg 32] throne. When Napoleon heard of the death of Paul, it is said that he gave utterance, for the first time in his life, to that irreverent expression, "Mon Dieu" (My God), which is ever upon the lips of every Frenchman. He regarded his death as a great calamity to France and to the world. The eccentricities of the Emperor amounted almost to madness. But his enthusiastic admiration for Napoleon united France and Russia in a close alliance.

By this battle, the confederacy's power was shattered. At the same time, Emperor Paul was killed in his palace by his nobles, and his son Alexander took the[Pg 32]throne. When Napoleon heard about Paul's death, it's said that he expressed, for the first time in his life, that irreverent phrase, "Mon Dieu" (My God), which is often on the lips of every Frenchman. He saw this death as a huge disaster for France and the world. The Emperor's eccentricities were nearly insane. However, his passionate admiration for Napoleon brought France and Russia into a strong alliance.

The nobles of Russia were much displeased with the democratic equality which Napoleon was sustaining in France. They plotted the destruction of the king, and raised Alexander to the throne, pledged to a different policy. The young monarch immediately withdrew from the maritime confederacy, and entered into a treaty of peace with England. These events apparently so disastrous to the interests of France, were on the contrary highly conducive to the termination of the war. The English people, weary of the interminable strife, and disgusted with the oceans of blood which had been shed, more and more clamorously demanded peace. And England could now make peace without the mortification of her pride.

The Russian nobles were very unhappy with the democratic equality that Napoleon was promoting in France. They conspired to overthrow the king and elevated Alexander to the throne, committed to a different approach. The young king quickly pulled out of the naval alliance and signed a peace treaty with England. These developments, which seemed disastrous for France, actually played a significant role in ending the war. The British public, tired of the endless conflict and horrified by the bloodshed, increasingly demanded peace. Now, England could make peace without losing face.

Napoleon was extremely vigilant in sending succor to the army in Egypt. He deemed it very essential in order to promote the maritime greatness of France, that Egypt should be retained as a colony. His pride was also enlisted in proving to the world that he had not transported forty-six thousand soldiers to Egypt in vain. Vessels of every description, ships of war, merchantmen, dispatch-boats, sailed almost daily from the various ports of Holland, France, Spain, Italy, and even from the coast of Barbary, laden with provisions, European goods, wines, munitions of war, and each taking a file of French newspapers. Many of these vessels were captured. Others, however, escaped the vigilance of the cruisers, and gave to the colony most gratifying proof of the interest which the First Consul took in its welfare. While Napoleon was thus daily endeavoring to send partial relief to the army in Egypt, he was at the same time preparing a vast expedition to convey thither a powerful reinforcement of troops and materials of war. Napoleon assembled this squadron at Brest, ostensibly destined for St. Domingo. He selected seven of the fastest sailing ships, placed on board of them five thousand men and an ample supply of all those stores most needed in Egypt. He ordered that each vessel should contain a complete assortment of every individual article, prepared for the colony, so that in the event of one vessel being captured, the colony would not be destitute of the precise article which that vessel might otherwise have contained. He also, in several other places, formed similar expeditions, hoping thus to distract the attention of England, and compel her to divide her forces to guard all exposed points. Taking advantage of this confusion, he was almost certain that some of the vessels would reach Egypt. The plan would have been triumphantly successful,[Pg 33] as subsequent events proved, had the naval commanders obeyed the instructions of Napoleon. A curious instance now occurred, of what may be called the despotism of the First Consul. And yet it is not strange that the French people should, under the peculiar circumstances, have respected and loved such despotism. The following order was issued to the Minister of Police: "Citizen Minister—Have the goodness to address a short circular to the editors of the fourteen journals, forbidding the insertion of any article, calculated to afford the enemy the slightest clew to the different movements which are taking place in our squadrons, unless the intelligence be derived from the official journal." Napoleon had previously through the regularly constituted tribunals, suppressed all the journals in Paris, but fourteen. The world has often wondered why France so readily yielded to the despotism of Napoleon. It was because the French were convinced that dictatorial power was essential to the successful prosecution of the war; and that each act of Napoleon was dictated by the most wise and sincere patriotism. They were willing to sacrifice the liberty of the press, that they might obtain victory over their enemies.

Napoleon was extremely focused on sending help to the army in Egypt. He believed it was essential for maintaining France's maritime power that Egypt be kept as a colony. His pride was also at stake, as he wanted to prove to the world that he hadn’t sent forty-six thousand soldiers to Egypt for nothing. Ships of all kinds—warships, cargo ships, and dispatch boats—sailed almost daily from various ports in Holland, France, Spain, Italy, and even from the Barbary coast, loaded with supplies, European goods, wines, munitions, and a supply of French newspapers. Many of these ships were captured. However, others managed to evade the watchful eye of the cruisers, providing the colony with clear evidence of the First Consul's concern for its well-being. While Napoleon was working daily to send partial aid to the army in Egypt, he was also preparing a large expedition to send a strong reinforcement of troops and military supplies. He gathered this fleet at Brest, supposedly bound for St. Domingo. He selected seven of the fastest sailing ships, loaded them with five thousand men, and stocked them with all the essential supplies for Egypt. He ordered that each ship carry a complete set of every item prepared for the colony, so if one ship were captured, the colony wouldn't lack the specific item that ship would have delivered. He also organized similar expeditions from several other locations, hoping to distract England and compel her to spread her forces across all vulnerable points. Capitalizing on this confusion, he was nearly certain that some of the ships would make it to Egypt. The plan would have been highly successful, as later events showed, had the naval commanders followed Napoleon's instructions. A curious incident occurred, highlighting what might be called the First Consul's despotism. However, it's not surprising that the French people, under the unique circumstances, respected and admired such leadership. An order was given to the Minister of Police: "Citizen Minister—Please send a short notice to the editors of the fourteen newspapers, prohibiting the publication of any article that might give the enemy even the slightest hint about the movements of our fleets, unless the information comes from the official journal." Napoleon had previously suppressed all the newspapers in Paris through the established courts, leaving only fourteen. The world has often wondered why France so easily accepted Napoleon's authoritarian rule. It was because the French believed that having a strong leader was crucial for winning the war, and that every action Napoleon took was motivated by true patriotism. They were willing to sacrifice press freedom to achieve victory over their enemies.

The condition of England was now truly alarming. Nearly all the civilized world was in arms against her. Her harvests had been cut off, and a frightful famine ravaged the land. The starving people were rising in different parts of the kingdom, pillaging the magnificent country seats of the English aristocracy, and sweeping in riotous mobs through the cities. The masses in England and in Ireland, wretchedly perishing of hunger, clamored loudly against Pitt. They alleged that he was the cause of all their calamities—that he had burdened the nation with an enormous debt and with insupportable taxes—that by refusing peace with France, he had drawn all the continental powers into hostility with England, and thus had deprived the people of that food from the Continent which was now indispensable for the support of life. The opposition, seeing the power of Pitt shaken, redoubled their blows. Fox, Tiernay, Grey, Sheridan, and Holland renewed their attacks with all the ardor of anticipated success. "Why," said they, "did you not make peace with France, when the First Consul proposed it before the battle of Marengo? Why did you not consent to peace, when it was again proposed after that battle? Why did you refuse consent to separate negotiation, when Napoleon was willing to enter into such without demanding the cessation of hostilities by sea?" They contrasted the distress of England with the prosperity of France. "France," said they, "admirably governed, is at peace with Europe. In the eyes of the world, she appears humane, wise, tranquil, evincing the most exemplary moderation after all her victories." With bitter irony they exclaimed, "What have you now to say of this young Bonaparte, of this rash youth who, according to the ministerial language, was only doomed to enjoy[Pg 34] a brief existence, like his predecessors, so ephemeral, that it did not entitle him to be treated with?"

The state of England was now truly alarming. Almost the entire civilized world was against her. Her harvests had been destroyed, and a terrible famine swept through the land. Starving people were rising up in different parts of the kingdom, looting the luxurious estates of the English elite, and marching in chaotic mobs through the cities. The masses in England and Ireland, desperately suffering from hunger, loudly protested against Pitt. They claimed he was responsible for all their misfortunes—that he had burdened the nation with an enormous debt and unbearable taxes—that by refusing peace with France, he had drawn all the continental powers into hostility with England, thus cutting the people off from the food from the Continent that they now desperately needed to survive. The opposition, seeing Pitt’s power weakened, intensified their attacks. Fox, Tiernay, Grey, Sheridan, and Holland renewed their assaults with all the zeal of expected victory. "Why," they asked, "did you not make peace with France when the First Consul offered it before the battle of Marengo? Why did you not agree to peace when it was suggested again after that battle? Why did you refuse to engage in separate negotiations when Napoleon was willing to do so without demanding the end of hostilities at sea?" They contrasted England's misery with France's prosperity. "France," they said, "is well governed and at peace with Europe. To the world, she appears humane, wise, and calm, showing exemplary restraint after all her victories." With bitter irony, they exclaimed, "What do you have to say about this young Bonaparte, this reckless youth who, according to official statements, was only destined to have a brief existence, like his predecessors, so fleeting that he didn't deserve to be taken seriously?"

Pitt was disconcerted by the number of his enemies, and by the clamors of a famishing people. His proud spirit revolted at the idea of changing his course. He could only reiterate his argument, that if he had not made war against revolutionary France, England would also have been revolutionized. There is an aspect of moral sublimity in the firmness with which this distinguished minister breasted a world in arms. "As to the demand of the neutral powers," said he, "we must envelop ourselves in our flag, and proudly find our grave in the deep, rather than admit the validity of such principles in the maritime code of nations." Though Pitt still retained his numerical majority in the Parliament, the masses of the people were turning with great power against him, and he felt that his position was materially weakened. Under these circumstances, Pitt, idolized by the aristocracy, execrated by the democracy, took occasion to send in his resignation. The impression seemed to be universal, that the distinguished minister, perceiving that peace must be made with France, temporarily retired, that it might be brought about by others, rather than by himself. He caused himself, however, to be succeeded by Mr. Addington, a man of no distinguished note, but entirely under his influence. The feeble intellect of the King of England, though he was one of the most worthy and conscientious of men, was unequal to these political storms. A renewed attack of insanity incapacitated him for the functions of royalty. Mr. Pitt, who had been prime minister for seventeen years, became by this event virtually the king of England, and Mr. Addington was his minister.

Pitt was unsettled by the number of his enemies and the cries of a starving populace. His proud spirit resisted the idea of changing his approach. He could only repeat his argument that if he hadn't gone to war against revolutionary France, England would have faced its own revolution. There’s a sense of moral greatness in the way this notable minister stood firm against a world at war. "As for the demands of neutral powers," he said, "we must wrap ourselves in our flag and proudly find our end in the depths of the sea, rather than accept the validity of such principles in the maritime code of nations." Although Pitt still had a majority in Parliament, public opinion was shifting strongly against him, and he sensed that his position was significantly weakened. Given these circumstances, Pitt, admired by the aristocracy but loathed by the masses, decided to submit his resignation. There was a widespread belief that the distinguished minister, realizing that peace with France needed to be negotiated, temporarily stepped back so that others could handle it instead of him. However, he arranged for Mr. Addington, a man of little distinction but completely under his influence, to succeed him. The fragile mind of the King of England, though he was one of the most honorable and dedicated men, was not equipped to handle these political crises. A resurgence of insanity rendered him unable to perform his royal duties. Mr. Pitt, who had served as prime minister for seventeen years, effectively became the ruler of England through this situation, with Mr. Addington as his minister.

Napoleon now announced to the world his determination to struggle hand to hand with England, until he had compelled that government to cease to make war against France. Conscious of the naval superiority of his foes, he avowed his resolve to cross the channel with a powerful army, march directly upon London, and thus compel the cabinet of St. James's to make peace. It was a desperate enterprise; so desperate that to the present day it is doubted whether Napoleon ever seriously contemplated carrying it into effect. It was, however, the only measure Napoleon could now adopt. The naval superiority of England was so undeniable, that a maritime war was hopeless. Nelson, in command of the fleet of the channel, would not allow even a fishing boat to creep out from a French cove. Napoleon was very desirous of securing in his favor the popular opinion of England, and the sympathies of the whole European public. He prepared with his own hand many articles for the "Moniteur," which were models of eloquent and urgent polemics, and which elicited admiration from readers in all countries. He wrote in the most respectful and complimentary terms of the new English ministry, representing them as intelligent, upright, and well-intentioned men.[Pg 35] He endeavored to assure Europe of the unambitious desires of France, and contrasted her readiness to relinquish the conquests which she had made, with the eager grasp with which the English held their enormous acquisitions in India, and in the islands of the sea. With the utmost delicacy, to avoid offending the pride of Britain, he affirmed that a descent upon England would be his last resource, that he fully appreciated the bravery and the power of the English, and the desperate risks which he should encounter in such an undertaking. But he declared that there was no other alternative left to him, and that if the English ministers were resolved that the war should not be brought to a close, but by the destruction of one of the two nations, there was not a Frenchman who would not make the most desperate efforts to terminate this cruel quarrel to the glory of France. "But why," exclaimed he, in words singularly glowing and beautiful, but of melancholy import, "why place the question on this last resort? Wherefore not put an end to the sufferings of humanity? Wherefore risk in this manner the lot of two great nations? Happy are nations when, having arrived at high prosperity, they have wise governments, which care not to expose advantages so vast, to the caprices and vicissitudes of a single stroke of fortune." These most impressive papers, from the pen of the First Consul, remarkable for their vigorous logic and impassioned eloquence, produced a deep impression upon all minds. This conciliatory language was accompanied by the most serious demonstrations of force upon the shores of the Channel. One hundred thousand men were upon the coasts of France, in the vicinity of Boulogne, preparing for the threatened invasion. Boats without number were collected to transport the troops across the narrow channel. It was asserted that by taking advantage of a propitious moment immediately after a storm had scattered the English fleet, France could concentrate such a force as to obtain a temporary command of the channel, and the strait could be crossed by the invaders. England was aroused thoroughly, but not alarmed. The militia was disciplined, the whole island converted into a camp. Wagons were constructed for the transportation of troops to any threatened point. It is important that the reader should distinguish this first threat of invasion in 1801, from that far more powerful naval and military organization executed for the same purpose in 1804, and known under the name of the Camp of Boulogne.

Napoleon declared to the world his intent to confront England directly until he forced that government to stop waging war against France. Aware of his enemies' naval superiority, he expressed his determination to cross the channel with a strong army, march straight to London, and compel the British government to negotiate peace. It was a risky venture; so risky that even today, people question whether Napoleon genuinely planned to go through with it. However, it was the only option he had left. England's naval dominance was so clear that engaging in maritime warfare seemed futile. Nelson, commanding the fleet in the channel, wouldn’t even allow a fishing boat to leave a French harbor. Napoleon was eager to win over public opinion in England and gain the sympathy of Europe as a whole. He personally wrote several articles for the "Moniteur," which were eloquent and persuasive, and they garnered admiration from readers everywhere. He praised the new English government, describing them as smart, honest, and well-meaning. He aimed to reassure Europe of France's lack of expansionist ambitions and compared France's willingness to give up its conquests to England's relentless pursuit of its vast territories in India and across various islands. With great tact, to avoid offending British pride, he stated that invading England would be his last resort, that he recognized the courage and strength of the English, and the significant risks he would face in such a move. Still, he insisted that if the English ministers were determined to continue the war until one nation was destroyed, every Frenchman would do whatever it took to resolve this brutal conflict in favor of France. "But why," he exclaimed, in particularly moving and beautiful yet somber words, "must we resort to such drastic measures? Why not end the suffering of humanity? Why risk the fate of two great nations in this way? Nations are fortunate when, having reached great prosperity, they have wise governments that avoid risking such vast advantages on the whims and unpredictability of fate." These powerful statements from the First Consul, notable for their strong logic and passionate eloquence, made a significant impact on everyone. This conciliatory tone was paired with serious displays of military strength along the Channel coast. One hundred thousand troops were stationed near Boulogne, preparing for the potential invasion. Countless boats were gathered to transport the soldiers across the narrow channel. It was said that if they seized the right moment right after a storm had scattered the English fleet, France could muster enough forces to momentarily control the channel and cross it with invaders. England was thoroughly stirred but not panicked. The militia was trained, and the entire island was turned into a camp. Wagons were built for moving troops to any threatened areas. It's important for the reader to differentiate this initial threat of invasion in 1801 from the much stronger naval and military preparations made for the same goal in 1804, known as the Camp of Boulogne.[Pg 35]

Not a little uneasiness was felt in England respecting the temporary success of the great conqueror. Famine raged throughout the island. Business was at a stand. The taxes were enormous. Ireland was on the eve of revolt. The mass of the English people admired the character of Napoleon; and, notwithstanding all the efforts of the government, regarded him as the foe of aristocracy and the friend of popular rights. Nelson, with an invincible armament, was triumphantly sweeping the Channel, and a[Pg 36] French gun-boat could not creep round a head-land without encountering the vigilance of the energetic hero. Napoleon, in escaping from Egypt, had caught Nelson napping in a lady's lap. The greatest admirers of the naval hero, could not but smile, half-pleased that, under the guilty circumstances, he had met with the misadventure. He was anxious, by a stroke of romantic heroism, to obliterate this impression from the public mind. The vast flotilla of France, most thoroughly manned and armed under the eye of Napoleon, was anchored at Boulogne, in three divisions, in a line parallel to the shore. Just before the break of day on the 4th of August, the fleet of Nelson, in magnificent array, approached the French flotilla, and for sixteen hours rained down upon it a perfect tornado of balls and shells. The gun-boats were, however, chained to one another, and to the shore. He did not succeed in taking a single boat, and retired mortified at his discomfiture, and threatening to return in a few days to take revenge. The French were exceedingly elated that in a naval conflict they had avoided defeat. As they stood there merely upon self-defense, victory was out of the question.

There was a lot of unease in England about the temporary success of the great conqueror. Famine was rampant across the island. Business had come to a halt. Taxes were sky-high. Ireland was on the brink of rebellion. Most of the English public admired Napoleon's character and, despite all the government's efforts, saw him as an enemy of the aristocracy and a supporter of popular rights. Nelson, with his unbeatable fleet, was triumphantly patrolling the Channel, and a[Pg 36] French gunboat couldn't move along the coastline without running into the vigilant hero. Napoleon had caught Nelson off guard in Egypt while he was napping in a lady's lap. Even the biggest fans of the naval hero couldn’t help but smile, somewhat amused that, given the embarrassing circumstances, he had faced such a mishap. He was eager to erase that impression from the public’s mind with a heroic act. Napoleon’s massive flotilla—fully manned and armed—was anchored at Boulogne in three parallel divisions along the shore. Just before dawn on August 4th, Nelson's fleet, in magnificent formation, approached the French ships and bombarded them for sixteen hours with an overwhelming barrage of cannonballs and shells. However, the gunboats were chained together and to the shore. He didn’t manage to capture a single boat and retreated, frustrated by his failure, vowing to return for revenge in a few days. The French were extremely pleased that they had managed to avoid defeat in a naval battle. Since they were only defending themselves, victory was not an option.

The reappearance of Nelson was consequently daily expected, and the French, emboldened by success, prepared to give him a warm reception. Twelve days after, on the 16th of August, Nelson again appeared with a vastly increased force. In the darkness of the night he filled his boats with picked men, to undertake one of the most desperate enterprises on record. In four divisions, with muffled oars, this forlorn hope, in the silence of midnight, approached the French flotilla. The butchery, with swords, hatchets, bayonets, bullets, and hand grenades, was hideous. Both parties fought with perfect fury. No man seemed to have the slightest regard for limb or life. England was fighting for, she knew not what. The French were contending in self-defense. For four long hours of midnight gloom, the slaughter continued. Thousands perished. Just as the day was dawning upon the horrid scene the English retired, repulsed at every point, and confessing to a defeat. The result of these conflicts diminished the confidence of the English in Nelson's ability to destroy the preparations of Napoleon, and increased their apprehension that the French might be enabled by some chance, to carry the war of invasion to their own firesides.

The return of Nelson was expected every day, and the French, encouraged by their previous success, got ready to give him a strong welcome. Twelve days later, on August 16th, Nelson showed up again with a significantly larger force. Under the cover of night, he filled his boats with elite troops to carry out one of the most daring missions ever recorded. In four groups, with muffled oars, this desperate attempt moved silently toward the French flotilla at midnight. The fighting, with swords, hatchets, bayonets, bullets, and hand grenades, was brutal. Both sides fought with incredible rage. No one seemed to care about their own limbs or lives. England was fighting for an unclear cause, while the French were fighting to defend themselves. For four long hours in the dark of night, the slaughter continued. Thousands died. Just as dawn broke over the dreadful scene, the English withdrew, having been beaten back at every point and admitting defeat. The outcomes of these battles shook the English confidence in Nelson's ability to thwart Napoleon's plans and heightened their fears that the French might somehow bring the war of invasion to their own homes.

"I was resolved," said Napoleon, afterward, "to renew, at Cherbourg, the wonders of Egypt. I had already raised in the sea my pyramid. I would also have had my Lake Mareotis. My great object was to concentrate all our maritime forces, and in time they would have been immense, in order to be able to deal out a grand stroke at the enemy. I was establishing my ground so as to bring the two nations, as it were, body to body. The ultimate issue could not be doubtful; for we had forty millions of French against fifteen millions of English. I would have terminated the strife by a battle of Actium."

"I was determined," said Napoleon later, "to recreate the wonders of Egypt at Cherbourg. I had already raised my pyramid from the sea. I also wanted my Lake Mareotis. My main goal was to gather all our naval forces, which would eventually be massive, so we could deliver a powerful blow to the enemy. I was setting the stage to bring the two nations, so to speak, face to face. The outcome couldn’t be uncertain; we had forty million French against fifteen million English. I would have ended the conflict with a battle like Actium."

One after another of the obstacles in the way of peace now gradually gave way. Overtures were made to Napoleon. He accepted the advances of England with the greatest eagerness and cordiality. "Peace," said he, "is easily brought about, if England desires it." On the evening of the 21st of October the preliminaries were signed in London. That very night a courier left England to convey the joyful intelligence to France. He arrived at Malmaison, the rural retreat of Napoleon, at four o'clock in the afternoon of the next day. At that moment the three Consuls were holding a government council. The excitement of joy, in opening the dispatches, was intense. The Consuls ceased from their labors, and threw themselves into each other's arms in cordial embraces. Napoleon, laying aside all reserve, gave full utterance to the intense joy which filled his bosom. It was for him a proud accomplishment. In two years, by his genius and his indefatigable exertions he had restored internal order to France, and peace to the world. Still, even in this moment of triumph, his entire, never wavering devotion to the welfare of France, like a ruling passion strong even in death, rose above his exultation. "Now that we have made a treaty of peace with England," said Cambaceres, "we must make a treaty of commerce, and remove all subjects of dispute between the two countries." Napoleon promptly replied, "Not so fast! The political peace is made. So much the better. Let us enjoy it. As to a commercial peace we will make one, if we can. But at no price will I sacrifice French industry. I remember the misery of 1786." The news had been kept secret in London for twenty-four hours, that the joyful intelligence might be communicated in both capitals at the same time. The popular enthusiasm both in England and France bordered almost upon delirium. It was the repose of the Continent. It was general, universal peace. It was opening the world to the commerce of all nations. War spreads over continents the glooms of the world of woe; while peace illumines them with the radiance of Heaven. Illuminations blazed every where. Men, the most phlegmatic, met and embraced each other with tears. The people of England surrendered themselves to the most extraordinary transports of ardor. They loved the French. They adored the hero, the sage, the great pacificator, who governed France. The streets of London resounded with shouts, "Long live Bonaparte." Every stage-coach which ran from London, bore triumphant banners, upon which were inscribed, Peace with France. The populace of London rushed to the house of the French negotiator. He had just entered his carriage to visit Lord Hawkesbury, to exchange ratifications. The tumultuous throng of happy men unharnessed his horses and dragged him in triumph, in the delirium of their joy rending the skies with their shouts. The crowd and the rapturous confusion at last became so great that Lord Vincent, fearing some accident, placed himself at the head of the amiable mob,[Pg 38] as it triumphantly escorted and conveyed the carriage from minister to minister.

One by one, the obstacles to peace gradually fell away. Proposals were made to Napoleon. He welcomed England's advances with great enthusiasm and warmth. "Peace," he said, "can be easily achieved if England wants it." On the evening of October 21st, the preliminaries were signed in London. That very night, a courier left England to bring the joyful news to France. He arrived at Malmaison, Napoleon's rural retreat, at four o'clock the next afternoon. At that moment, the three Consuls were holding a government meeting. The excitement of joy as they opened the dispatches was intense. The Consuls stopped their work and embraced each other warmly. Napoleon, dropping all restraint, expressed the deep joy filling his heart. It was a proud achievement for him. In two years, through his brilliance and tireless efforts, he had restored order to France and peace to the world. Yet, even in this moment of triumph, his unwavering commitment to France's welfare, like a strong passion even in death, overshadowed his joy. "Now that we've made a treaty of peace with England," Cambaceres said, "we need to establish a treaty of commerce to settle all disputes between our countries." Napoleon quickly replied, "Not so fast! The political peace is done. That's great. Let's enjoy it. As for a commercial peace, we will create one if we can. But I will not sacrifice French industry at any cost. I remember the suffering of 1786." The news had been kept secret in London for twenty-four hours so that it could be shared simultaneously in both capitals. The public excitement in both England and France was almost overwhelming. It was a time of calm across the Continent. It was universal peace. It was opening up the world to commerce among all nations. War brings despair and suffering across the continents, while peace brightens them with heavenly light. Everywhere, there were celebrations. Even the most stoic individuals met and embraced each other in tears. The English people were swept up in extraordinary expressions of joy. They loved the French. They adored the hero, the wise one, the great peacemaker governing France. The streets of London echoed with cries of "Long live Bonaparte." Every coach leaving London was adorned with triumphant banners proclaiming, Peace with France. The crowd in London rushed to the house of the French negotiator. He had just entered his carriage to visit Lord Hawkesbury to exchange ratifications. The excited crowd of joyful people unharnessed his horses and pulled him along in triumph, their cheers filling the air. The crowd's ecstatic chaos grew so intense that Lord Vincent, fearing an accident, stepped in front of the jubilant throng,[Pg 38] guiding the carriage from minister to minister.

A curious circumstance occurred at the festival in London, highly characteristic of the honest bluntness, resolution, and good nature of English seamen. The house of M. Otto, the French minister, was most brilliantly illuminated. Attracted by its surpassing splendor a vast crowd of sailors had gathered around. The word concord blazed forth most brilliantly in letters of light. The sailors, not very familiar with the spelling-book, exclaimed, "Conquered! not so, by a great deal. That will not do." Excitement and dissatisfaction rapidly spread. Violence was threatened. M. Otto came forward himself most blandly, but his attempts at explanation were utterly fruitless. The offensive word was removed, and amity substituted. The sailors, fully satisfied with the amende honorable, gave three cheers and went on their way rejoicing.

A curious situation happened at the festival in London that really showed the honest straightforwardness, determination, and kindness of English sailors. The house of M. Otto, the French minister, was lit up spectacularly. Drawn in by its amazing brightness, a large crowd of sailors gathered around. The word concord shone brightly in lights. The sailors, not very familiar with spelling, shouted, "Conquered! not at all. That won’t work." Excitement and discontent quickly spread. Violence was threatened. M. Otto approached himself very calmly, but his attempts to explain were completely useless. The offensive word was taken down, and amity was put up instead. The sailors, fully satisfied with the amende honorable, cheered three times and went on their way celebrating.

In France the exultation was, if possible, still greater than in England. The admiration of Napoleon, and the confidence in his wisdom and his patriotism were perfectly unbounded. No power was withheld from the First Consul which he was willing to assume. The nation placed itself at his feet. All over the Continent Napoleon received the honorable title of "The Hero Pacificator of Europe." And yet there was a strong under-current to this joy. Napoleon was the favorite, not of the nobles, but of the people. Even his acts of despotic authority were most cordially sustained by the people of France, for they believed that such acts were essential for the promotion of their welfare. "The ancient privileged classes and the foreign cabinets," said Napoleon, "hate me worse than they did Robespierre." The hosannas with which the name of Bonaparte was resounding through the cities and the villages of England fell gloomily upon the ears of Mr. Pitt and his friends. The freedom of the seas was opening to the energetic genius of Napoleon, an unobstructed field for the maritime aggrandizement of France. The British minister knew that the sleepless energies of Napoleon would, as with a magician's wand, call fleets into existence to explore all seas. Sorrowfully he contemplated a peace to which the popular voice had compelled him to yield, and which in his judgment boded no good to the naval superiority of England.

In France, the excitement was even greater than in England. The admiration for Napoleon and the belief in his wisdom and patriotism were limitless. The nation gave him all the power he wanted. Everyone looked up to him. Across the Continent, Napoleon earned the esteemed title of "The Hero Pacificator of Europe." Yet, beneath this joy was a strong undercurrent. Napoleon was favored not by the nobles, but by the people. Even his acts of authoritarian rule were widely supported by the people of France because they believed such actions were necessary for their well-being. "The old privileged classes and the foreign governments," Napoleon said, "hate me more than they hated Robespierre." The cheers for Bonaparte echoed through the cities and villages of England, falling heavily on the ears of Mr. Pitt and his allies. The freedom of the seas was giving Napoleon, with his boundless energy, a clear path for the maritime expansion of France. The British minister realized that Napoleon's restless energy would, like a magician's wand, conjure fleets to explore every ocean. He sadly considered a peace that the public had forced him to accept, knowing in his heart it would not bode well for England's naval supremacy.

It was agreed that the plenipotentiaries, to settle the treaty definitively, should meet at Amiens, an intermediate point midway between London and Paris. The English appointed as their minister Lord Cornwallis. The Americans, remembering this distinguished general at Brandywine, Camden, and at the surrender of Yorktown, have been in the habit of regarding him as an enemy. But he was a gallant soldier, and one of the most humane, high-minded, and estimable of men. Frankly he avowed his conviction that the time had arrived for terminating the miseries of the world by peace. Napoleon has paid a noble tribute to the integrity, urbanity, sagacity,[Pg 39] and unblemished honor of Lord Cornwallis. Joseph Bonaparte was appointed by the First Consul embassador on the part of France. The suavity of his manners, the gentleness of his disposition, his enlightened and liberal political views, and the Christian morality which, in those times of general corruption, embellished his conduct, peculiarly adapted him to fulfill the duties of a peace-maker. Among the terms of the treaty it was agreed that France should abandon her colony in Egypt, as endangering the English possessions in India. In point of fact, the French soldiers had already, by capitulation, agreed to leave Egypt, but tidings of the surrender had not then reached England or France. The most important question in these deliberations was the possession of the Island of Malta. The power in possession of that impregnable fortress had command of the Mediterranean. Napoleon insisted upon it, as a point important above all others, that England should not retain Malta. He was willing to relinquish all claim to it himself, and to place it in the hands of a neutral power; but he declared his unalterable determination that he could by no possibility consent that it should remain in the hands of England. At last England yielded, and agreed to evacuate Malta, and that it should be surrendered to the Knights of St. John.

It was decided that the representatives would meet in Amiens to finalize the treaty, as it was a halfway point between London and Paris. The English chose Lord Cornwallis as their minister. The Americans, recalling his role in Brandywine, Camden, and the surrender at Yorktown, have often seen him as an adversary. However, he was a brave soldier and one of the most respectful, principled, and admirable people. He openly stated that he believed it was time to end the suffering in the world through peace. Napoleon praised Lord Cornwallis for his integrity, politeness, intelligence, and untarnished honor. Joseph Bonaparte was appointed by the First Consul as France's ambassador. His smooth manners, gentle nature, progressive political ideas, and Christian ethics, which stood out in a time of widespread corruption, made him especially suited to be a peacemaker. Among the terms of the treaty, it was agreed that France would give up its colony in Egypt, as it posed a threat to British interests in India. In reality, the French soldiers had already agreed to leave Egypt, but news of their capitulation had not yet reached England or France. The most critical issue in these discussions was who would control Malta. The power that held that stronghold would dominate the Mediterranean. Napoleon insisted that England should not keep Malta, considering it the most crucial point of all; he was willing to give up any claim to it himself and hand it over to a neutral party, but he firmly declared that he could not agree to it remaining under British control. Eventually, England conceded and agreed to withdraw from Malta, which would then be given to the Knights of St. John.

This pacification, so renowned in history both for its establishment and for its sudden and disastrous rupture, has ever been known by the name of the Peace of Amiens. Napoleon determined to celebrate the joyful event by a magnificent festival. The 10th of November, 1801, was the appointed day. It was the anniversary of Napoleon's attainment of the consular power. Friendly relations having been thus restored between the two countries, after so many years of hostility and carnage, thousands of the English flocked across the channel and thronged the pavements of Paris. All were impatient to see France, thus suddenly emerging from such gloom into such unparalleled brilliancy; and especially to see the man, who at that moment was the admiration of England and of the world. The joy which pervaded all classes invested this festival with sublimity. With a delicacy of courtesy characteristic of the First Consul, no carriages but those of Lord Cornwallis were allowed in the streets on that day. The crowd of Parisians, with most cordial and tumultuous acclamations, opened before the representative of the armies of England. The illustrious Fox was one of the visitors on this occasion. He was received by Napoleon with the utmost consideration, and with the most delicate attentions. In passing through the gallery of sculpture, his lady pointed his attention to his own statue filling a niche by the side of Washington and Brutus. "Fame," said Napoleon, "had informed me of the talents of Fox. I soon found that he possessed a noble character, a good heart, liberal, generous, and enlightened views. I considered him an ornament to mankind, and was much attached to him." Every one who came[Pg 40] into direct personal contact with the First Consul at this time, was charmed with his character.

This peace, famous in history for both its establishment and its sudden and disastrous breakdown, has always been known as the Peace of Amiens. Napoleon decided to celebrate this joyful event with a grand festival. The 10th of November, 1801, was the chosen day, marking the anniversary of Napoleon's rise to consular power. With friendly relations restored between the two countries after so many years of hostility and bloodshed, thousands of English people crossed the channel and filled the streets of Paris. Everyone was eager to see France, which had suddenly emerged from gloom into such unmatched brightness, and especially to see the man who was admired by England and the world. The joy that filled all classes gave this festival a special significance. With a gracious touch typical of the First Consul, no carriages were allowed on the streets that day except for Lord Cornwallis's. The crowd of Parisians warmly and enthusiastically welcomed the representative of the British armies. The notable Fox was one of the guests that day. Napoleon received him with great respect and attention. While walking through the sculpture gallery, Fox's wife pointed out his own statue in a niche next to those of Washington and Brutus. "Fame," said Napoleon, "had informed me of Fox’s talents. I quickly realized he had a noble character, a good heart, and liberal, generous, enlightened views. I considered him an asset to humanity and felt very attached to him." Everyone who had direct personal contact with the First Consul at that time was charmed by his character.

Nine deputies from Switzerland, the most able men the republic could furnish, were appointed to meet Napoleon, respecting the political arrangements of the Swiss cantons. Punctual to the hour the First Consul entered a neat spacious room, where there was a long table covered with green baize. Dr. Jones of Bristol, the intimate friend of several of these deputies, and who was with them in Paris at the time, thus describes the interview. "The First Consul entered, followed by two of his ministers, and after the necessary salutation, sat down at the head of the table, his ministers on each side of him. The deputies then took their seats. He spread out before them a large map as necessary to the subject of their deliberations. He then requested that they would state freely any objection which might occur to them in the plan which he should propose. They availed themselves of the liberty, and suggested several alterations which they deemed advantageous to France and Switzerland. But from the prompt, clear, and unanswerable reasons which Napoleon gave in reply to all their objections, he completely convinced them of the wisdom of his plans. After an animated discussion of ten hours, they candidly admitted that he was better acquainted with the local circumstances of the Swiss cantons, and with what would secure their welfare than they were themselves. During the whole discussion his ministers did not speak one word. The deputies afterward declared that it was their decided opinion that Napoleon was the most extraordinary man whom they had met in modern times, or of whom they had read in ancient history." Said M. Constant and M. Sismondi, who both knew Napoleon well, "The quickness of his conception, the depth of his remarks, the facility and propriety of his eloquence, and above all the candor of his replies and his patient silence, were more remarkable and attractive than we ever met with in any other individual."

Nine deputies from Switzerland, the most capable individuals the republic could provide, were chosen to meet Napoleon regarding the political arrangements of the Swiss cantons. On time, the First Consul entered a tidy, spacious room, where there was a long table covered with green felt. Dr. Jones from Bristol, a close friend of several of these deputies and who was with them in Paris at the time, described the meeting this way: "The First Consul came in, followed by two of his ministers, and after the necessary greeting, he sat down at the head of the table, with his ministers on either side. The deputies then took their seats. He laid out a large map in front of them, as it was essential to their discussion. He then asked them to express any objections they might have regarding the plan he would propose. They took him up on his offer and suggested several modifications they believed would benefit both France and Switzerland. However, the clear, logical, and convincing reasons Napoleon provided in response to all their objections completely persuaded them of the soundness of his proposals. After an enthusiastic discussion lasting ten hours, they honestly conceded that he understood the local situations of the Swiss cantons and what would ensure their well-being better than they did themselves. Throughout the entire discussion, his ministers didn’t speak a word. The deputies later stated that it was their firm belief that Napoleon was the most extraordinary man they had encountered in modern times or read about in ancient history." M. Constant and M. Sismondi, both of whom knew Napoleon well, commented, "The speed of his understanding, the depth of his insights, the ease and appropriateness of his speech, and above all, the honesty of his responses and his patient silence were more remarkable and captivating than we encountered in any other person."

"What your interests require," said Napoleon, at this time, "is: 1. Equality of rights among the whole eighteen cantons. 2. A sincere and voluntary renunciation of all exclusive privileges on the part of patrician families. 3. A federative organization, where every canton may find itself arranged according to its language, its religion, its manners, and its interests. The central government remains to be provided for, but it is of much less consequence than the central organization. Situated on the summit of the mountains which separate France, Italy, and Germany, you participate in the disposition of all these countries. You have never maintained regular armies, nor had established, accredited agents at the courts of the different governments. Strict neutrality, a prosperous commerce, and family administration, can alone secure your interests, or be suited to your wishes. Every organization which could be established among you, hostile to the interests of France, would injure you in the most essential particulars." This was commending[Pg 41] to them a federative organization similar to that of the United States, and cautioning them against the evil of a centralization of power. No impartial man can deny that the most profound wisdom marked the principles which Napoleon suggested to terminate the divisions with which the cantons of Switzerland had long been agitated. "These lenient conditions," says Alison, "gave universal satisfaction in Switzerland." The following extract from the noble speech which Napoleon pronounced on the formation of the constitution of the confederacy, will be read by many with surprise, by all with interest.

"What your interests require," said Napoleon at this time, "is: 1. Equal rights among all eighteen cantons. 2. A genuine and voluntary renunciation of all exclusive privileges by patrician families. 3. A federal organization, where each canton can be structured according to its language, religion, customs, and interests. The central government still needs to be established, but it is far less important than the central organization. Situated on the peaks of the mountains that separate France, Italy, and Germany, you are involved in the affairs of all these countries. You have never maintained regular armies, nor had official representatives at the governments' courts. Strict neutrality, thriving commerce, and family governance are the only ways to secure your interests and align with your desires. Any organization arising among you that opposes France's interests would harm you in the most significant ways." This was recommending to them a federal structure similar to that of the United States, and cautioning them against the dangers of centralizing power. No fair-minded person can deny that the wise principles Napoleon proposed to resolve the divisions that had long troubled the cantons of Switzerland are profound. "These lenient conditions," says Alison, "gave universal satisfaction in Switzerland." The following excerpt from the noble speech Napoleon delivered during the formation of the confederacy's constitution will be surprising to many and interesting to all.

"The re-establishment of the ancient order of things in the democratic cantons is the best course which can be adopted, both for you and me. They are the states whose peculiar form of government render them so interesting in the eyes of all Europe. But for this pure democracy you would exhibit nothing which is not to be found elsewhere. Beware of extinguishing so remarkable a distinction. I know well that this democratic system of administration has many inconveniences. But it is established. It has existed for centuries. It springs from the circumstances, situation, and primitive habits of the people, from the genius of the place, and can not with safety be abandoned. You must never take away from a democratic society the practical exercise of its privileges. To give such exercise a direction consistent with the tranquillity of the state is the part of true political wisdom. In ancient Rome the votes were counted by classes, and they threw into the last class the whole body of indigent citizens, while the first contained only a few hundred of the most opulent. But the populace were content, and, amused with the solicitation of their votes, did not perceive the immense difference in their relative value." The moral influence which France thus obtained in Switzerland was regarded with extreme jealousy by all the rival powers. Says Alison, who, though imbued most strongly with monarchical and aristocratic predilections, is the most appreciative and impartial of the historians of Napoleon, "His conduct and language on this occasion, were distinguished by his usual penetration and ability, and a most unusual degree of lenity and forbearance. And if any thing could have reconciled the Swiss to the loss of their independence, it must have been the wisdom and equity on which his mediation was founded."

"The restoration of the ancient order in the democratic cantons is the best course of action for both you and me. These states have a unique form of government that makes them fascinating to all of Europe. Without this pure democracy, you wouldn't have anything that can't be found elsewhere. Don't risk losing such a remarkable distinction. I understand that this democratic system has its drawbacks. But it's established and has existed for centuries. It comes from the circumstances, situation, and original habits of the people, as well as the spirit of the place, and can't be safely abandoned. You should never strip a democratic society of the practical exercise of its privileges. Guiding that exercise in a way that maintains state peace is the essence of true political wisdom. In ancient Rome, votes were counted by classes, with all impoverished citizens placed in the last class, while the first contained only a few hundred wealthy individuals. However, the common people were satisfied and, distracted by the push for their votes, didn't notice the huge difference in their relative value." The moral influence that France gained in Switzerland was viewed with great jealousy by all the rival powers. Alison, who, although strongly inclined toward monarchies and aristocracies, is the most appreciative and impartial historian of Napoleon, states, "His conduct and language on this occasion were marked by his usual insight and skill, and an unusually high level of leniency and restraint. If anything could have made the Swiss accept the loss of their independence, it would have been the wisdom and fairness behind his mediation."

The English who visited Paris, were astonished at the indications of prosperity which the metropolis exhibited. They found France in a very different condition from the hideous picture which had been described by the London journals. But there were two parties in England. Pitt and his friends submitted with extreme reluctance to a peace which they could not avoid. Says Alison, "But while these were the natural feelings of the inconsiderate populace, who are ever governed by present impressions, and who were for the most part destitute of the information[Pg 42] requisite to form a rational opinion on the subject, there were many men, gifted with greater sagacity and foresight, who deeply lamented the conditions by which peace had been purchased, and from the very first prophesied that it could be of no long endurance. They observed that the war had been abruptly terminated, without any one object being gained for which it was undertaken; that it was entered into in order to curb the ambition, and to stop the democratic propagandism of France." These "many men gifted with greater sagacity," with William Pitt at their head, now employed themselves with sleepless vigilance and with fatal success to bring to a rupture a peace which they deemed so untoward. Sir Walter Scott discloses the feelings with which this party were actuated, in the observations, "It seems more than probable that the extreme rejoicing of the rabble of London, at signing the preliminaries, their dragging about the carriage of Lauriston, and shouting 'Bonaparte forever,' had misled the ruler of France into an opinion that peace was indispensably necessary to England. He may easily enough have mistaken the cries of a London mob for the voice of the British people."

The English visitors in Paris were shocked by the signs of prosperity that the city showed. They found France in a very different state than the terrible picture painted by the London newspapers. However, there were two factions in England. Pitt and his allies reluctantly accepted a peace they couldn’t avoid. Alison notes, "While these feelings were typical of the careless public, who are often influenced by immediate impressions and mostly lack the knowledge required to form a rational opinion on the matter, there were many individuals with greater insight and foresight who deeply regretted the terms under which peace was achieved and from the very beginning predicted it wouldn’t last long. They noted that the war had ended suddenly, without achieving any of the goals for which it had started; it was waged to limit France's ambition and to halt its democratic spread." These "many individuals with greater insight," led by William Pitt, were now tirelessly working with fatal effectiveness to bring about a breakdown of a peace they believed was unfavorable. Sir Walter Scott reveals the sentiments driving this faction with his remarks, "It seems more than likely that the extreme celebration of the London mob at the signing of the preliminaries, their parading of Lauriston's carriage, and their shouts of 'Bonaparte forever' may have misled the ruler of France into thinking that peace was absolutely necessary for England. He could easily have misinterpreted the cries of a London mob as the voice of the British people."

In the midst of all these cares, Napoleon was making strenuous efforts to restore religion to France. It required great moral courage to prosecute such a movement. Nearly all the generals in his armies were rank infidels, regarding every form of religion with utter contempt. The religious element, by nature, predominated in the bosom of Napoleon. He was constitutionally serious, thoughtful, pensive. A profound melancholy ever overshadowed his reflective spirit. His inquisitive mind pondered the mysteries of the past and the uncertainties of the future. Educated in a wild country, where the peasantry were imbued with religious feelings, and having been trained by a pious mother, whose venerable character he never ceased to adore, the sight of the hallowed rites of religion revived in his sensitive and exalted imagination the deepest impressions of his childhood. He had carefully studied, on his return from Egypt, the New Testament, and appreciated and profoundly admired its beautiful morality. He often conversed with Monge, Lagrange, Laplace, sages whom he honored and loved, and he frequently embarrassed them in their incredulity, by the logical clearness of his arguments. The witticisms of Voltaire, and the corruptions of unbridled sin, had rendered the purity of the gospel unpalatable to France. Talleyrand, annoyed by the remembrance of his own apostasy, bitterly opposed what he called "the religious peace." Nearly all the supporters and friends of the First Consul condemned every effort to bring back that which they denominated the reign of superstition. Napoleon honestly believed that the interests of France demanded that God should be recognized and Christianity respected by the French nation.

In the middle of all these concerns, Napoleon was working hard to bring religion back to France. It took a lot of moral courage to pursue such a cause. Almost all the generals in his armies were outright unbelievers, treating every form of religion with complete disdain. The religious aspect, by nature, was prominent in Napoleon. He was naturally serious, thoughtful, and reflective. A deep melancholy always hung over his contemplative spirit. His curious mind wrestled with the mysteries of the past and the uncertainties of the future. Raised in a rugged environment where the local people held strong religious beliefs, and having been educated by a devout mother, whose esteemed character he always cherished, witnessing the sacred rituals of religion stirred up in his sensitive and elevated imagination the deepest memories of his childhood. Upon his return from Egypt, he had thoroughly studied the New Testament and greatly appreciated and admired its beautiful moral teachings. He often talked with Monge, Lagrange, and Laplace, wise men whom he respected and loved, and he frequently challenged them in their skepticism with the logical clarity of his arguments. The jokes of Voltaire and the excesses of unrestrained sin had made the purity of the gospel unappealing to France. Talleyrand, irritated by his own past betrayal, fiercely opposed what he called "the religious peace." Nearly all the supporters and friends of the First Consul condemned any attempts to revive what they labeled the reign of superstition. Napoleon sincerely believed that France's best interests required the recognition of God and respect for Christianity by the French nation.

"Hear me," said Napoleon one day earnestly to Monge. "I do not maintain these opinions through the positiveness of a devotee, but from[Pg 43] reason. My religion is very simple. I look at this universe, so vast, so complex, so magnificent, and I say to myself that it can not be the result of chance, but the work, however intended, of an unknown, omnipotent being, as superior to man as the universe is superior to the finest machines of human invention. Search the philosophers, and you will not find a more decisive argument, and you can not weaken it. But this truth is too succinct for man. He wishes to know, respecting himself and respecting his future destiny, a crowd of secrets which the universe does not disclose. Allow religion to inform him of that which he feels the need of knowing, and respect her disclosures."

"Hear me," Napoleon said one day earnestly to Monge. "I don't hold these beliefs out of blind faith but for a reason. My faith is quite simple. I look at this universe, so vast, so complex, so magnificent, and I tell myself that it cannot be the result of chance but the work, however intended, of an unknown, all-powerful being, as far above man as the universe is above the finest machines we create. Look through the philosophers, and you won’t find a stronger argument, and you can't diminish it. But this truth is too brief for humanity. People want to understand a lot of secrets about themselves and their future that the universe doesn't reveal. Let religion provide what they feel the need to know, and respect its insights."

One day when this matter was under earnest discussion in the council of state, Napoleon said, "Last evening I was walking alone, in the woods, amid the solitude of nature. The tones of a distant church bell fell upon my ear. Involuntarily I felt deep emotion. So powerful is the influence of early habits and associations. I said to myself, If I feel thus, what must be the influence of such impressions upon the popular mind? Let your philosophers answer that, if they can. It is absolutely indispensable to have a religion for the people. It will be said that I am a Papist. I am not. I am convinced that a part of France would become Protestant, were I to favor that disposition. I am also certain that the much greater portion would continue Catholic; and that they would oppose, with the greatest zeal, the division among their fellow-citizens. We should then have the Huguenot wars over again, and interminable conflicts. But by reviving a religion which has always prevailed in the country, and by giving perfect liberty of conscience to the minority, all will be satisfied."

One day, while discussing this matter seriously in the state council, Napoleon said, "Last night I was walking alone in the woods, surrounded by the solitude of nature. I heard the distant sound of a church bell. It moved me deeply, almost against my will. The impact of early habits and associations is incredibly strong. I thought to myself, if I feel this way, what must be the effect of such feelings on the general public? Let the philosophers explain that, if they can. It's absolutely essential to have a religion for the people. Some might say I'm a Catholic. I'm not. I believe that part of France would become Protestant if I supported that direction. However, I'm also sure that a much larger portion would remain Catholic and would strongly oppose any split among their fellow citizens. That would lead us back to the Huguenot wars and endless conflicts. But by restoring a religion that has always been dominant in the country and allowing complete freedom of conscience for the minority, everyone could be content."

On another occasion he remarked, "What renders me most hostile to the establishment of the Catholic worship, are the numerous festivals formerly observed. A saint's-day is a day of idleness, and I do not wish for that. People must labor in order to live. I shall consent to four holidays during the year, but to no more. If the gentlemen from Rome are not satisfied with that, they may take their departure." The loss of time appeared to him such a calamity, that he almost invariably appointed any indispensable celebration upon some day previously devoted to festivity.

On another occasion he said, "What makes me most opposed to establishing Catholic worship are the numerous festivals that were celebrated before. A saint's day is just a day of doing nothing, and I don’t want that. People need to work to survive. I’ll agree to four holidays a year, but not more than that. If the guys from Rome aren’t satisfied with that, they can leave." He thought wasting time was such a disaster that he almost always scheduled any necessary celebrations on days that were originally set aside for festivities.

The new pontiff was attached to Napoleon by the secret chain of mutual sympathy. They had met, as we have before remarked, during the wars of Italy. Pius VII., then the bishop of Imola, was surprised and delighted in finding in the young republican general, whose fame was filling Europe, a man of refinement, of exalted genius, of reflection, of serious character, of unblemished purity of life, and of delicate sensibilities, restraining the irreligious propensities of his soldiers, and respecting the temples of religion. With classic purity and eloquence he spoke the Italian language. The dignity and decorum of his manners, and his love of order, were strangely contrasted with the recklessness[Pg 44] of the ferocious soldiers with whom he was surrounded. The impression thus produced upon the heart of the pontiff was never effaced. Justice and generosity are always politic. But he must indeed be influenced by an ignoble spirit who hence infers, that every act of magnanimity is dictated by policy. A legate was sent by the Pope to Paris. "Let the holy father," said Napoleon, "put the utmost confidence in me. Let him cast himself into my arms, and I will be for the church another Charlemagne."

The new pope felt a strong connection to Napoleon through a shared understanding. As we’ve mentioned before, they had met during the wars in Italy. Pius VII, who was the bishop of Imola at the time, was both surprised and pleased to find in the young republican general—whose fame was spreading across Europe—a man of sophistication, great intelligence, thoughtful nature, serious character, unblemished integrity, and sensitive feelings. He kept his soldiers' irreligious tendencies in check and showed respect for places of worship. He spoke Italian with both clarity and eloquence. His dignity and decorum stood in sharp contrast to the wildness of the fierce soldiers he led. The impression he left on the pope was lasting. Justice and generosity are always beneficial to politics. However, only someone with a lowly spirit would conclude that every act of nobility is simply a political move. The pope sent a representative to Paris. "Let the holy father," said Napoleon, "trust me completely. Let him rely on me, and I will be for the church what Charlemagne was."

Napoleon had collected for himself a religious library of well chosen books, relating to the organization and the history of the church, and to the relations of church and state. He had ordered the Latin writings of Bossuet to be translated for him. These works he had devoured in those short intervals which he could glean from the cares of government. His genius enabled him, at a glance, to master the argument of an author, to detect any existing sophistry. His memory, almost miraculously retentive, and the philosophical cast of his mind, gave him at all times the perfect command of these treasures of knowledge. He astonished the world by the accuracy, extent, and variety of his information upon all points of religion. It was his custom, when deeply interested in any subject, to discuss it with all persons from whom he could obtain information. With clear, decisive, and cogent arguments he advocated his own views, and refuted the erroneous systems successively proposed to him. It was urged upon Napoleon, that if he must have a church, he should establish a French church, independent of that of Rome. The poetic element was too strong in the character of Napoleon for such a thought. "What!" he exclaimed, "shall I, a warrior, wearing sword and spurs, and doing battle, attempt to become the head of a church, and to regulate church discipline and doctrine. I wish to be the pacificator of France and of the world, and shall I become the originator of a new schism, a little more absurd and not less dangerous than the preceding ones. I must have a Pope, and a Pope who will approximate men's minds to each other, instead of creating divisions; who will reunite them, and give them to the government sprung from the revolution, as a price for the protection that he shall have obtained from it. For this purpose I must have the true Pope, the Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman Pope, whose seat is at the Vatican. With the French armies and some deference, I shall always be sufficiently his master. When I shall raise up the altars again, when I shall protect the priests, when I shall feed them, and treat them as ministers of religion deserve to be treated in every country, he will do what I ask of him, through the interest he will have in the general tranquillity. He will calm men's minds, reunite them under his hand, and place them under mine. Short of this there is only a continuation and an aggravation of the desolating schism which is preying on us, and for me an immense and indelible ridicule."

Napoleon had put together a religious library filled with well-chosen books about the organization and history of the church, as well as the relationship between church and state. He had ordered the Latin writings of Bossuet to be translated for him. He devoured these works during the little free time he could find amid his governmental duties. His genius allowed him to quickly grasp an author’s main argument and detect any fallacies. His memory, almost miraculously strong, along with his philosophical mindset, gave him complete control over this treasure of knowledge at all times. He amazed the world with the accuracy, scope, and variety of his knowledge about all aspects of religion. When he was deeply interested in a subject, he would discuss it with anyone who could provide insight. With clear, decisive, and compelling arguments, he supported his own views and debunked the flawed systems that were presented to him. People suggested to Napoleon that if he needed a church, he should create a French church independent of Rome. However, the poetic side of Napoleon’s character couldn't accept such an idea. "What!" he exclaimed, "am I, a warrior, dressed in sword and spurs, fighting battles, supposed to become the head of a church and regulate its discipline and doctrine? I want to be the peacemaker of France and the world, and should I create a new schism, which would be just as absurd and no less dangerous than the previous ones? I need a Pope—a Pope who will bring people together instead of causing divisions; a Pope who will reunite them and offer them to the government arising from the revolution as a reward for the protection he will have received. For this, I need the true Pope, the Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman Pope, whose seat is at the Vatican. With the French armies and some respect, I’ll always have enough control over him. When I restore the altars, protect the priests, and treat them as ministers of religion should be treated everywhere, he will do what I ask of him because he will have an interest in preserving overall peace. He will calm people's minds, unite them under his authority, and place them under mine. Without this, we face only a continuation and worsening of the destructive schism that is afflicting us, and for me, an immense and lasting mockery."

The Pope's legate most strenuously urged[Pg 45] some of the most arrogant and exclusive assumptions of the papal church. "The French people must be allured back to religion," said Napoleon, "not shocked. To declare the Catholic religion the religion of the state is impossible. It is contrary to the ideas prevalent in France, and will never be admitted. In place of this declaration we can only substitute the avowal of the fact, that the Catholic religion is the religion of the majority of Frenchmen. But there must be perfect freedom of opinion. The amalgamation of wise and honest men of all parties is the principle of my government. I must apply that principle to the church as well as to the state. It is the only way of putting an end to the troubles of France, and I shall persist in it undeviatingly."

The Pope's representative strongly pushed back against[Pg 45] some of the most arrogant and exclusionary beliefs of the papal church. "We need to draw the French people back to religion," Napoleon said, "not scare them away. It’s impossible to declare the Catholic religion as the religion of the state. That goes against the ideas that are common in France and will never be accepted. Instead of that declaration, we can only acknowledge that the Catholic religion is the faith of the majority of French people. But there has to be complete freedom of thought. The unification of wise and honest individuals from all sides is the foundation of my government. I must apply that principle to the church as well as to the state. It’s the only way to end the troubles in France, and I will stick to it unwaveringly."

Napoleon was overjoyed at the prospect, not only of a general peace with Europe, but of religious peace in France. In all the rural districts, the inhabitants longed for their churches and their pastors, and for the rites of religion. In the time of the Directory, a famous wooden image of the Virgin had been taken from the church at Loretto, and was deposited in one of the museums of Paris, as a curiosity. The sincere Catholics were deeply wounded and irritated by this act, which to them appeared so sacrilegious. Great joy was caused both in France and Italy, when Napoleon sent a courier to the Pope, restoring this statue, which was regarded with very peculiar veneration. The same embassador carried the terms of agreement for peace with the church. This religious treaty with Rome was called "The Concordat." The Pope, in secular power, was helpless. Napoleon could, at any moment, pour a resistless swarm of troops into his territories. As the French embassador left the Tuileries, he asked the First Consul for his instructions. "Treat the Pope," said Napoleon, magnanimously, "as if he had two hundred thousand soldiers." The difficulties in the way of an amicable arrangement were innumerable. The army of France was thoroughly infidel. Most of the leading generals and statesmen who surrounded Napoleon, contemplated Christianity in every aspect with hatred and scorn. On the other hand, the Catholic Church, uninstructed by misfortune, was not disposed to abate in the least its arrogant demands, and was clamorous for concessions which even Napoleon had not power to confer. It required all the wisdom, forbearance, and tact of the First Consul to accomplish this reconciliation. Joseph Bonaparte, the accomplished gentleman, the sincere, urbane, sagacious, upright man, was Napoleon's corps de reserve in all diplomatic acts. The preliminaries being finally adjusted, the Pope's legation met at the house of Joseph Bonaparte, and on the 15th of July, 1801, this great act was signed. Napoleon announced the event to the Council of State. He addressed them in a speech an hour and a half in length, and all were struck with the precision, the vigor, and the loftiness of his language. By universal consent his speech was pronounced to be eloquent in the highest degree. But those philosophers, who regarded it as the[Pg 46] great glory of the revolution, that all superstition, by which they meant all religion, was swept away, in sullen silence yielded to a power which they could not resist. The people, the millions of France, were with Napoleon.

Napoleon was thrilled at the idea, not just of a general peace with Europe, but also of religious peace in France. In all the rural areas, people longed for their churches, their pastors, and the rituals of their faith. During the time of the Directory, a famous wooden image of the Virgin had been taken from the church at Loretto and placed in one of the museums in Paris as a curiosity. This act deeply wounded and angered sincere Catholics, who saw it as sacrilegious. There was great joy in both France and Italy when Napoleon sent a courier to the Pope to return this statue, which was held in special reverence. The same ambassador also carried the terms for peace with the church. This religious treaty with Rome was called "The Concordat." The Pope, lacking secular power, was helpless. At any moment, Napoleon could unleash a relentless army into his territories. As the French ambassador left the Tuileries, he asked the First Consul for his instructions. "Treat the Pope," Napoleon said generously, "as if he had two hundred thousand soldiers." The obstacles to a friendly agreement were countless. The French army was largely irreligious. Most of the top generals and statesmen around Napoleon looked at Christianity with disdain and contempt. On the other hand, the Catholic Church, untempered by hardship, was unwilling to back down from its demanding stance and was insisting on concessions that even Napoleon couldn't grant. It took all the wisdom, patience, and skill of the First Consul to achieve this reconciliation. Joseph Bonaparte, the polished gentleman, sincere, cultured, wise, and honorable man, was Napoleon's corps de reserve in all diplomatic matters. Once the preliminaries were settled, the Pope's delegation met at Joseph Bonaparte's house, and on July 15, 1801, this significant agreement was signed. Napoleon announced the event to the Council of State with a speech that lasted an hour and a half, and everyone was impressed by the clarity, strength, and nobility of his words. By unanimous agreement, his speech was deemed highly eloquent. However, those philosophers who viewed the revolution's great achievement as the eradication of all superstition—meaning all religion—fell into a gloomy silence, yielding to a power they could not resist. The people, the millions of France, were behind Napoleon.

The following liberal and noble sentiments were uttered in the proclamation by which Napoleon announced the Concordat to the French people: "An insane policy has sought, during the revolution, to smother religious dissensions under the ruins of the altar, under the ashes of religion itself. At its voice all those pious solemnities ceased, in which the citizens called each other by the endearing name of brothers, and acknowledged their common equality in the sight of Heaven. The dying, left alone in his agonies, no longer heard that consoling voice, which calls the Christian to a better world. God Himself seemed exiled from the face of nature. Ministers of the religion of peace, let a complete oblivion vail over your dissensions, your misfortunes, your faults. Let the religion which unites you, bind you by indissoluble cords to the interests of your country. Let the young learn from your precepts, that the God of Peace is also the God of Arms, and that He throws his shield over those who combat for the liberties of France. Citizens of the Protestant Faith, the law has equally extended its solicitude to your interests. Let the morality, so pure, so holy, so brotherly, which you profess, unite you all in love to your country, and in respect for its laws; and, above all, never permit disputes on doctrinal points to weaken that universal charity which religion at once inculcates and commands."

The following liberal and noble sentiments were expressed in the proclamation by which Napoleon announced the Concordat to the French people: "A reckless policy has tried, during the revolution, to suppress religious conflicts under the ruins of the altar, under the ashes of faith itself. At its command, all those sacred ceremonies stopped, in which citizens referred to one another with the loving term of brothers, acknowledging their shared equality in the eyes of Heaven. The dying person, left alone in their pain, no longer heard that comforting voice that calls Christians to a better world. God Himself seemed banished from nature. Ministers of the religion of peace, let complete forgetfulness cover your disagreements, your misfortunes, your faults. Let the faith that unites you tie you with unbreakable bonds to the interests of your country. Let the youth learn from your teachings that the God of Peace is also the God of War, and that He protects those who fight for France's freedoms. Citizens of the Protestant Faith, the law has also shown care for your interests. Let the morality, so pure, so holy, so fraternal, that you uphold unite you all in love for your country and respect for its laws; and, above all, never let doctrinal disputes weaken that universal charity which religion both teaches and commands."

To foreign nations the spectacle of France, thus voluntarily returning to the Christian faith, was gratifying in the highest degree. It seemed to them the pledge of peace and the harbinger of tranquillity. The Emperor of Russia, and the King of Prussia publicly expressed their joy at the auspicious event. The Emperor of Austria styled it "a service truly rendered to all Europe." The serious and devout, in all lands, considered the voluntary return of the French people to religion, from the impossibility of living without its precepts, as one of the most signal triumphs of the Christian faith.

To foreign nations, the sight of France willingly returning to the Christian faith was incredibly pleasing. It appeared to them as a sign of peace and a promise of calm. The Emperor of Russia and the King of Prussia publicly shared their happiness about this positive development. The Emperor of Austria called it "a service truly rendered to all of Europe." Serious and devout people everywhere saw the French people's voluntary return to religion, realizing they couldn't live without its principles, as one of the greatest victories of the Christian faith.

On the 11th of April, 1802, the event was celebrated by a magnificent religious ceremony in the cathedral of Nôtre Dame. No expense was spared to invest the festivity with the utmost splendor. Though many of the generals and the high authorities of the State were extremely reluctant to participate in the solemnities of the occasion, the power and the popularity of the First Consul were so great, that they dared not make any resistance. The cathedral was crowded with splendor. The versatile populace, ever delighted with change and with shows, were overjoyed. General Rapp, however, positively refused to attend the ceremony. With the bluntness of a soldier, conscious that his well-known devotion to the First Consul would procure for him impunity, he said, "I shall not attend. But if you do not make these priests your[Pg 47] aids or your cooks, you may do with them as you please."

On April 11, 1802, the event was celebrated with a grand religious ceremony in the Notre Dame Cathedral. No expense was spared to make the celebration as magnificent as possible. Although many generals and high-ranking officials of the State were very hesitant to join in the festivities, the power and popularity of the First Consul were so significant that they didn’t dare to resist. The cathedral was filled with splendor. The ever-changing and show-loving crowd was thrilled. However, General Rapp flatly refused to attend the ceremony. With the straightforwardness of a soldier, confident that his well-known loyalty to the First Consul would protect him, he said, "I won't attend. But if you don’t make these priests your[Pg 47] aides or your cooks, you can do whatever you want with them."

As Napoleon was making preparations to go to the cathedral, Cambaceres entered his apartment.

As Napoleon was getting ready to head to the cathedral, Cambaceres walked into his room.

"Well," said the First Consul, rubbing his hands in the glow of his gratification, "we go to church this morning. What say they to that in Paris?"

"Well," said the First Consul, rubbing his hands in the glow of his satisfaction, "we're going to church this morning. What do they think about that in Paris?"

"Many persons," replied Cambaceres, "propose to attend the first representation in order to hiss the piece, should they not find it amusing."

"Many people," replied Cambaceres, "plan to go to the first performance just to boo the show if they don't find it entertaining."

"If any one," Napoleon firmly replied, "takes it into his head to hiss, I shall put him out of the door by the grenadiers of the consular guard."

"If anyone," Napoleon replied firmly, "decides to hiss, I'll have him thrown out the door by the grenadiers of the consular guard."

"But what if the grenadiers themselves," Cambaceres rejoined, "should take to hissing, like the rest?"

"But what if the grenadiers themselves," Cambaceres replied, "started hissing like everyone else?"

"As to that I have no fear," said Napoleon. "My old mustaches will go here to Notre Dame, just as at Cairo, they would have gone to the mosque. They will remark how I do, and seeing their general grave and decent, they will be so, too, passing the watchword to each other, Decency."

"As for that, I’m not worried," said Napoleon. "My old mustaches will come here to Notre Dame, just like they would have gone to the mosque in Cairo. They’ll notice how I carry myself, and seeing their general serious and respectful, they’ll act the same way, passing the word to each other, Respect."

"What did you think of the ceremony?" inquired Napoleon of General Delmas, who stood near him, when it was concluded. "It was a fine piece of mummery," he replied; "nothing was wanting but the million of men who have perished to destroy that which you have now re-established." Some of the priests, encouraged by this triumphant restoration of Christianity, began to assume not a little arrogance. A celebrated opera dancer died, not in the faith. The priest of St. Roche refused to receive the body into the church, or to celebrate over it the rites of interment. The next day Napoleon caused the following article to be inserted in the Moniteur. "The curate of St. Roche, in a moment of hallucination, has refused the rites of burial to Mademoiselle Cameroi. One of his colleagues, a man of sense, received the procession into the church of St. Thomas, where the burial service was performed with the usual solemnities. The archbishop of Paris has suspended the curate of St. Roche for three months, to give him time to recollect that Jesus Christ commanded us to pray even for our enemies. Being thus recalled by meditation to a proper sense of his duties, he may learn that all these superstitious observances, the offspring of an age of credulity or of crazed imaginations, tend only to the discredit of true religion, and have been proscribed by the recent concordat of the French Church." The most strenuous exertions were made by the clergy to induce Napoleon publicly to partake of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper. It was thought that his high example would be very influential upon others. Napoleon nobly replied, "I have not sufficient faith in the ordinance to be benefited by its reception; and I have too much faith in it to allow me to be guilty of sacrilege. We are well as we are. Do not ask me to go farther. You will never obtain what you wish. I will[Pg 48] not become a hypocrite. Be content with what you have already gained."

"What did you think of the ceremony?" Napoleon asked General Delmas, who was standing nearby when it ended. "It was just a grand show," he replied; "the only thing missing was the million men who have died to bring back what you’ve just reinstated." Some of the priests, emboldened by this triumphant return of Christianity, began to act rather arrogantly. A famous opera dancer died outside the faith. The priest of St. Roche refused to allow the body into the church or to conduct the burial rites. The next day, Napoleon had the following article published in the Moniteur. "The curate of St. Roche, in a moment of confusion, has denied the burial rites to Mademoiselle Cameroi. One of his colleagues, a reasonable man, took the procession into the church of St. Thomas, where the burial service was held with the usual solemnities. The archbishop of Paris has suspended the curate of St. Roche for three months to give him time to remember that Jesus Christ instructed us to pray even for our enemies. Recalled to his responsibilities through reflection, he may understand that all these superstitious practices, stemming from an age of gullibility or disturbed imaginations, only undermine true religion and have been rejected by the recent concordat of the French Church." The clergy put forth great effort to persuade Napoleon to publicly take part in the Lord's Supper. It was believed that his prominent example would greatly influence others. Napoleon responded firmly, "I don't have enough faith in this ordinance to benefit from receiving it; and I have too much faith in it to let myself commit sacrilege. We're fine as we are. Don't ask me to go any further. You will never get what you want. I will not become a hypocrite. Be satisfied with what you’ve already achieved."

It is difficult to describe the undisguised delight with which the peasants all over France again heard the ringing of the church-bells upon the Sabbath morning, and witnessed the opening of the church-doors, the assembling of the congregations with smiles and congratulations, and the repose of the Sabbath. Mr. Fox, in conversation with Napoleon, after the peace of Amiens, ventured to blame him for not having authorized the marriage of priests in France. "I then had," said Napoleon, in his nervous eloquence, "need to pacify. It is with water and not with oil that you must extinguish theological volcanoes. I should have had less difficulty in establishing the Protestant religion in my empire."

It’s hard to express the pure joy that peasants all over France felt when they heard the church bells ringing again on Sunday morning. They saw the church doors opening, congregations coming together with smiles and congratulations, and the calm of the Sabbath settling in. Mr. Fox, while talking to Napoleon after the peace of Amiens, dared to criticize him for not allowing priests to marry in France. "I needed to keep the peace," Napoleon replied with his usual intensity. "You need to use water, not oil, to put out theological fires. I would have had an easier time establishing the Protestant religion in my empire."

The magistrates of Paris, grateful for the inestimable blessings which Napoleon had conferred upon France, requested him to accept the project of a triumphal monument to be erected in his honor at a cost of one hundred thousand dollars. Napoleon gave the following reply. "I view with grateful acknowledgments those sentiments which actuate the magistrates of the city of Paris. The idea of dedicating monumental trophies to those men who have rendered themselves useful to the community is a praiseworthy action in all nations. I accept the offer of the monument which you desire to dedicate to me. Let the spot be designated. But leave the labor of constructing it to future generations, should they think fit thus to sanction the estimate which you place upon my services."

The officials of Paris, thankful for the invaluable benefits that Napoleon had given to France, asked him to accept a proposal for a triumphal monument to be built in his honor at a cost of one hundred thousand dollars. Napoleon responded with the following: "I appreciate the sentiments expressed by the officials of the city of Paris. The idea of dedicating monumental tributes to those who have served the community is commendable in all nations. I gladly accept the offer of the monument you wish to dedicate to me. Let the location be chosen. But leave the work of building it to future generations if they decide to acknowledge the value you place on my contributions."

There was an indescribable fascination about the character of Napoleon, which no other man ever possessed, and which all felt who entered his presence. Some military officers of high rank, on one occasion, in these days of his early power, agreed to go and remonstrate with him upon some subject which had given them offense. One of the party thus describes the interview.

There was an undeniable fascination about Napoleon that no other man had, and everyone who met him felt it. Some high-ranking military officers, during his early days of power, decided to confront him about something that had upset them. One of the group describes the meeting this way.

"I do not know whence it arises, but there is a charm about that man, which is indescribable and irresistible. I am no admirer of him. I dislike the power to which he has risen. Yet I can not help confessing that there is a something in him, which seems to speak that he is born to command. We went into his apartment determined to declare our minds to him very freely; to expostulate with him warmly, and not to depart till our subjects of complaint were removed. But in his manner of receiving us, there was a certain something, a degree of fascination, which disarmed us in a moment; nor could we utter one word of what we had intended to say. He talked to us for a long time, with an eloquence peculiarly his own, explaining, with the utmost clearness and precision, the necessity for steadily pursuing the line of conduct he had adopted. Without contradicting us in direct terms, he controverted our opinions so ably, that we had not a word to say in reply. We left him, having done nothing else but listen to him, instead of expostulating with him; and fully convinced,[Pg 49] at least for the moment, that he was in the right, and that we were in the wrong."

"I don't know where it comes from, but there's something about that man that's indescribable and hard to resist. I'm not a fan of him. I dislike the power he's gained. Still, I have to admit there's something about him that suggests he was meant to lead. We went to his place ready to express our opinions honestly; to confront him passionately, and not leave until our grievances were addressed. But the way he welcomed us had a sort of charm that disarmed us instantly; we couldn't say a word of what we had planned. He spoke to us for a long time, with a unique eloquence, clearly explaining why he needed to stick to the course of action he had chosen. Without outright contradicting us, he countered our views so skillfully that we had no response. We left, having only listened to him instead of confronting him; completely convinced, at least for that moment, that he was right, and we were wrong.[Pg 49]"

The merchants of Rouen experienced a similar fascination, when they called to remonstrate against some commercial regulations which Napoleon had introduced. They were so entirely disarmed by his frankness, his sincerity, and were so deeply impressed by the extent and the depth of his views, that they retired, saying, "The First Consul understands our interests far better than we do ourselves." "The man," says Lady Morgan, "who, at the head of a vast empire, could plan great and lasting works, conquer nations, and yet talk astronomy with La Place, tragedy with Talma, music with Cherubini, painting with Gerrard, vertu with Denon, and literature and science with any one who would listen to him, was certainly out of the roll of common men."

The merchants of Rouen were similarly captivated when they came to protest against some trade regulations that Napoleon had put in place. They were completely disarmed by his openness and sincerity, and they were so impressed by the depth and breadth of his ideas that they left, saying, "The First Consul understands our interests much better than we do ourselves." "The man," says Lady Morgan, "who, leading a vast empire, could plan significant and lasting projects, conquer nations, and still talk about astronomy with La Place, tragedy with Talma, music with Cherubini, painting with Gerrard, collectibles with Denon, and literature and science with anyone willing to listen, was definitely not an ordinary person."

Napoleon now exerted all his energies for the elevation of France. He sought out and encouraged talent wherever it could be found. No merit escaped his princely munificence. Authors, artists, men of science were loaded with honors and emoluments. He devoted most earnest attention to the education of youth. The navy, commerce, agriculture, manufactures, and all mechanic arts, secured his assiduous care. He labored to the utmost, and with a moral courage above all praise, to discountenance whatever was loose in morals, or enervating or unmanly in amusements or taste. The theatre was the most popular source of entertainment in France. He frowned upon all frivolous and immodest performances, and encouraged those only which were moral, grave, and dignified. In the grandeur of tragedy alone he took pleasure. In his private deportment he exhibited the example of a moral, simple, and toilsome life. Among the forty millions of France, there was not to be found a more temperate and laborious man. When nights of labor succeeded days of toil, his only stimulus was lemonade. He loved his own family and friends, and was loved by them with a fervor which soared into the regions of devotion. Never before did mortal man secure such love. Thousands were ready at any moment to lay down their lives through their affection for him. And that mysterious charm was so strong that it has survived his death. Thousands now live who would brave death in any form from love for Napoleon.

Napoleon put all his efforts into uplifting France. He sought out and supported talent wherever it existed. No one with merit went unnoticed by his generous nature. Writers, artists, and scientists were showered with honors and rewards. He focused intensely on the education of the young. The navy, commerce, agriculture, manufacturing, and all skilled trades received his dedicated attention. He worked tirelessly with commendable moral courage to discourage anything immoral, weak, or unmanly in entertainment or culture. The theater was the most popular form of entertainment in France. He disapproved of all trivial and indecent performances, only promoting those that were moral, serious, and dignified. He found joy solely in the grandeur of tragedy. In his personal life, he set an example of a moral, simple, and hardworking lifestyle. Among the forty million people in France, no one was more temperate and diligent than he was. After long days of work, his only refreshment was lemonade. He loved his family and friends deeply, and they returned that love with a passion that bordered on devotion. Never before had any man inspired such profound love. Thousands were willing to give their lives for him at a moment's notice. That mysterious bond was so powerful that it survived his death. Thousands still live today who would face death in any form out of love for Napoleon.


PECULIAR HABITS OF DISTINGUISHED AUTHORS.

Among the curious facts which we find in perusing the biographies of great men, are the circumstances connected with the composition of the works which have made them immortal.

Among the interesting details we discover by reading the biographies of great individuals are the events related to the creation of the works that have made them famous.

For instance, Bossuet composed his grand sermons on his knees; Bulwer wrote his first novels in full dress, scented; Milton, before commencing his great work, invoked the influence of the Holy Spirit, and prayed that his lips might be touched with a live coal from off the[Pg 50] altar; Chrysostom meditated and studied while contemplating a painting of Saint Paul.

For example, Bossuet wrote his impressive sermons while kneeling; Bulwer penned his first novels in formal attire, with cologne; Milton, before starting his monumental work, called on the Holy Spirit's influence and prayed for his lips to be touched with a live coal from off the[Pg 50] altar; Chrysostom reflected and studied while gazing at a painting of Saint Paul.

Bacon knelt down before composing his great work, and prayed for light from Heaven. Pope never could compose well without first declaiming for some time at the top of his voice, and thus rousing his nervous system to its fullest activity.

Bacon knelt down before starting his great work and prayed for inspiration from above. Pope could never write well without first speaking loudly for a while, which helped energize his nervous system to fully engage.

Bentham composed after playing a prelude on the organ, or while taking his "ante-jentacular" and "post-prandial" walks in his garden—the same, by the way, that Milton occupied. Saint Bernard composed his Meditations amidst the woods; he delighted in nothing so much as the solitude of the dense forest, finding there, he said, something more profound and suggestive than any thing he could find in books. The storm would sometimes fall upon him there, without for a moment interrupting his meditations. Camoens composed his verses with the roar of battle in his ears; for, the Portuguese poet was a soldier, and a brave one, though a poet. He composed others of his most beautiful verses, at the time when his Indian slave was begging a subsistence for him in the streets. Tasso wrote his finest pieces in the lucid intervals of madness.

Bentham wrote after playing a prelude on the organ or while taking his "morning" and "afternoon" walks in his garden—the same garden, by the way, that Milton used to walk in. Saint Bernard wrote his Meditations in the woods; he found nothing more enjoyable than the solitude of the thick forest, saying it offered something deeper and more thought-provoking than anything he could find in books. Sometimes storms would strike while he was there, but they never interrupted his thoughts. Camoens wrote his poems with the sounds of battle surrounding him because the Portuguese poet was also a soldier, and a brave one at that. He wrote some of his most beautiful verses while his Indian slave begged for his survival in the streets. Tasso created his best works during the clear moments in his madness.

Rousseau wrote his works early in the morning; Le Sage at mid-day; Byron at midnight. Hardouin rose at four in the morning, and wrote till late at night. Aristotle was a tremendous worker; he took little sleep, and was constantly retrenching it. He had a contrivance by which he awoke early, and to awake was with him to commence work. Demosthenes passed three months in a cavern by the sea-side, in laboring to overcome the defects of his voice. There he read, studied, and declaimed.

Rousseau wrote his works early in the morning; Le Sage at noon; Byron at midnight. Hardouin got up at four in the morning and wrote until late at night. Aristotle was an incredibly hard worker; he slept very little and often cut back on it. He had a method that helped him wake up early, and for him, waking up meant starting to work. Demosthenes spent three months in a cave by the seaside, working to fix the issues with his voice. There, he read, studied, and practiced speaking.

Rabelais composed his Life of Gargantua at Bellay, in the company of Roman cardinals, and under the eyes of the Bishop of Paris. La Fontaine wrote his fables chiefly under the shade of a tree, and sometimes by the side of Racine and Boileau. Pascal wrote most of his Thoughts on little scraps of paper, at his by-moments. Fenelon wrote his Telemachus in the palace of Versailles, at the court of the Grand Monarque, when discharging the duties of tutor to the Dauphin. That a book so thoroughly democratic should have issued from such a source, and been written by a priest, may seem surprising. De Quesnay first promulgated his notion of universal freedom of person and trade, and of throwing all taxes on the land—the germ, perhaps, of the French Revolution—in the boudoir of Madame de Pompadour!

Rabelais wrote his Life of Gargantua at Bellay, surrounded by Roman cardinals and under the watchful eyes of the Bishop of Paris. La Fontaine created his fables mostly in the shade of a tree, sometimes alongside Racine and Boileau. Pascal jotted down most of his Thoughts on little scraps of paper during his free time. Fenelon wrote his Telemachus in the palace of Versailles while serving as the tutor to the Dauphin at the court of the Grand Monarque. It might seem surprising that a book so deeply democratic came from such a source and was written by a priest. De Quesnay first introduced his idea of universal freedom for people and trade, along with shifting all taxes onto land—the seed, perhaps, of the French Revolution—in the boudoir of Madame de Pompadour!

Luther, when studying, always had his dog lying at his feet—a dog he had brought from Wartburg, and of which he was very fond. An ivory crucifix stood on the table before him, and the walls of his study were stuck round with caricatures of the Pope. He worked at his desk for days together without going out; but when fatigued, and the ideas began to stagnate in his brain, he would take his flute or his guitar with him into the porch, and there execute some musical[Pg 51] fantasy (for he was a skillful musician), when the ideas would flow upon him again as fresh as flowers after summer's rain. Music was his invariable solace at such times. Indeed Luther did not hesitate to say, that after theology, music was the first of arts. "Music," said he, "is the art of the prophets; it is the only other art, which, like theology, can calm the agitation of the soul, and put the devil to flight." Next to music, if not before it, Luther loved children and flowers. That great gnarled man had a heart as tender as a woman's.

Luther, when he was studying, always had his dog lying at his feet—a dog he had brought from Wartburg, and he was very fond of it. An ivory crucifix sat on the table in front of him, and the walls of his study were covered with caricatures of the Pope. He worked at his desk for days on end without going outside; but when he got tired and his thoughts started to slow down, he would take his flute or his guitar into the porch and play some musical fantasies (he was a skilled musician), and then his ideas would come back to him as fresh as flowers after a summer rain. Music was his constant comfort at times like that. In fact, Luther didn't hesitate to say that after theology, music was the highest art. "Music," he said, "is the art of the prophets; it is the only other art, like theology, that can calm the soul's turmoil and drive away the devil." Besides music, if not more than that, Luther loved children and flowers. That great, gnarled man had a heart as tender as a woman's.

Calvin studied in his bed. Every morning at five or six o'clock, he had books, manuscripts, and papers, carried to him there, and he worked on for hours together. If he had occasion to go out, on his return he undressed and went to bed again to continue his studies. In his later years he dictated his writings to secretaries. He rarely corrected any thing. The sentences issued complete from his mouth. If he felt his facility of composition leaving him, he forthwith quitted his bed, gave up writing and composing, and went about his out-door duties for days, weeks, and months together. But so soon as he felt the inspiration fall upon him again, he went back to his bed, and his secretary set to work forthwith.

Calvin studied in his bed. Every morning around five or six o'clock, he had books, manuscripts, and papers brought to him, and he would work for hours on end. If he needed to go out, when he got back, he would undress and get back in bed to continue his studies. In his later years, he dictated his writings to secretaries. He rarely made any corrections. The sentences came out fully formed from his mouth. If he felt his ability to write slipping away, he would immediately get out of bed, stop writing and composing, and focus on his outdoor tasks for days, weeks, or even months. But as soon as he felt inspired again, he would return to his bed, and his secretary would get to work right away.

Cujas, another learned man, used to study when laid all his length upon the carpet, his face toward the floor, and there he reveled amidst piles of books which accumulated about him. The learned Amyot never studied without the harpsichord beside him; and he only quitted the pen to play it. Bentham, also, was extremely fond of the piano-forte, and had one in nearly every room in his house.

Cujas, another scholar, would study while lying flat on the carpet, face down, surrounded by piles of books that accumulated around him. The knowledgeable Amyot never studied without a harpsichord next to him, only putting down the pen to play it. Bentham was also very fond of the piano and had one in almost every room in his house.

Richelieu amused himself in the intervals of his labor, with a squadron of cats, of whom he was very fond. He used to go to bed at eleven at night, and after sleeping three hours, rise and write, dictate or work, till from six to eight o'clock in the morning, when his daily levee was held. This worthy student displayed an extravagance equaling that of Wolsey. His annual expenditure was some four millions of francs, or about £170,000 sterling!

Richelieu entertained himself during his breaks from work with a group of cats that he loved very much. He would go to bed at eleven at night and after sleeping for three hours, he would get up and write, dictate, or work until six to eight in the morning, when his daily meetings began. This dedicated scholar showed a lavish lifestyle that rivaled Wolsey's. His yearly spending was about four million francs, or around £170,000!

How different the fastidious temperance of Milton! He drank water and lived on the humblest fare. In his youth he studied during the greatest part of the night; but in his more advanced years he went early to bed—by nine o'clock—rising to his studies at four in summer and five in winter. He studied till mid-day; then he took an hour's exercise, and after dinner he sang and played the organ, or listened to others' music. He studied again till six, and from that hour till eight he engaged in conversation with friends who came to see him. Then he supped, smoked a pipe of tobacco, drank a glass of water, and went to bed. Glorious visions came to him in the night, for it was then, while lying on his couch, that he composed in thought the greater part of his sublime poem. Sometimes when the fit of composition came strong upon him, he would summon his daughter to[Pg 52] his side, to commit to paper that which he had composed.

How different was Milton's meticulous lifestyle! He drank water and lived on the simplest food. In his youth, he studied most of the night; but as he got older, he went to bed early—by nine o'clock—waking up for his studies at four in summer and five in winter. He studied until noon; then he took an hour of exercise, and after lunch, he sang and played the organ or listened to others play music. He studied again until six, and from then until eight, he chatted with friends who visited him. After that, he had supper, smoked a pipe, drank a glass of water, and went to bed. Amazing visions came to him at night, for that's when, lying on his couch, he created most of his remarkable poem in his mind. Sometimes when the urge to write struck him strongly, he would call his daughter to[Pg 52]his side to write down what he had composed.

Milton was of opinion that the verses composed by him between the autumnal and spring equinoxes were always the best, and he was never satisfied with the verses he had written at any other season. Alfieri, on the contrary, said that the equinoctial winds produced a state of almost "complete stupidity" in him. Like the nightingales he could only sing in summer. It was his favorite season.

Milton believed that the poems he wrote between the autumn and spring equinoxes were always the best, and he was never happy with the poems he wrote at any other time. On the other hand, Alfieri said that the equinoctial winds made him feel almost "completely stupid." Like nightingales, he could only sing in the summer. It was his favorite season.

Pierre Corneille, in his loftiest flights of imagination, was often brought to a stand-still for want of words and rhyme. Thoughts were seething in his brain, which he vainly tried to reduce to order, and he would often run to his brother Thomas "for a word." Thomas rarely failed him. Sometimes, in his fits of inspiration, he would bandage his eyes, throw himself on a sofa, and dictate to his wife, who almost worshiped his genius. Thus he would pass whole days, dictating to her his great tragedies; his wife scarcely venturing to speak, almost afraid to breathe. Afterward, when a tragedy was finished, he would call in his sister Martha, and submit it to her judgment; as Moliere used to consult his old housekeeper about the comedies he had newly written.

Pierre Corneille, in his most elevated bursts of creativity, often found himself stuck for lack of words and rhymes. Ideas were bubbling in his mind, which he struggled to organize, and he would frequently turn to his brother Thomas "for a word." Thomas rarely let him down. Sometimes, during his moments of inspiration, he would cover his eyes, fling himself onto a sofa, and dictate to his wife, who almost revered his talent. He would spend entire days dictating his great tragedies to her; his wife barely daring to speak, almost afraid to breathe. Later, when a tragedy was completed, he would invite his sister Martha to give her opinion, just as Molière used to consult his old housekeeper about the new comedies he had written.

Racine composed his verses while walking about, reciting them in a loud voice. One day, when thus working at his play of Mithridates, in the Tuileries Gardens, a crowd of workmen gathered around him, attracted by his gestures; they took him to be a madman about to throw himself into the basin. On his return home from such walks, he would write down scene by scene, at first in prose, and when he had thus written it out, he would exclaim, "My tragedy is done," considering the dressing of the acts up in verse as a very small affair.

Racine wrote his verses while walking around, reciting them out loud. One day, while working on his play *Mithridates* in the Tuileries Gardens, a crowd of workers gathered around him, drawn in by his gestures; they thought he was a crazy person about to jump into the fountain. When he returned home from those walks, he would jot down scene by scene, initially in prose, and after he had done that, he would shout, "My tragedy is done," viewing the task of turning the acts into verse as a minor detail.

Magliabecchi, the learned librarian to the Duke of Tuscany, on the contrary, never stirred abroad, but lived amidst books, and almost lived upon books. They were his bed, board, and washing. He passed eight-and-forty years in their midst, only twice in the course of his life venturing beyond the walls of Florence; once to go two leagues off, and the other time three and a half leagues, by order of the Grand Duke. He was an extremely frugal man, living upon eggs, bread, and water, in great moderation.

Magliabecchi, the knowledgeable librarian to the Duke of Tuscany, on the other hand, never went out but lived surrounded by books, and practically lived off them. They were his bed, meals, and laundry. He spent forty-eight years among them, only leaving the walls of Florence twice in his life; once to travel two leagues away, and the other time three and a half leagues, at the Grand Duke's request. He was a very frugal person, surviving on eggs, bread, and water, and did so with great moderation.

The life of Liebnitz was one of reading, writing, and meditation. That was the secret of his prodigious knowledge. After an attack of gout, he confined himself to a diet of bread and milk. Often he slept in a chair; and rarely went to bed till after midnight. Sometimes he was months without quitting his seat, where he slept by night and wrote by day. He had an ulcer in his right leg which prevented his walking about, even had he wished to do so.

The life of Leibniz was filled with reading, writing, and reflection. That was the key to his incredible knowledge. After a bout of gout, he stuck to a diet of bread and milk. He often dozed off in a chair and rarely went to bed before midnight. Sometimes he would spend months without leaving his seat, where he slept at night and wrote during the day. He had an ulcer on his right leg that stopped him from walking around, even if he had wanted to.

The chamber in which Montesquieu wrote his Spirit of the Laws, is still shown at his old ancestral mansion; hung about with its old tapestry and curtains; and the old easy chair in which the philosopher sat is still sacredly preserved there.[Pg 53] The chimney-jamb bears the mark of his foot, where he used to rest upon it, his legs crossed, when composing his books. His Persian Letters were composed merely for pastime, and were never intended for publication. The principles of Laws occupied his life. In the study of these he spent twenty years, losing health and eye-sight in the pursuit. As in the case of Milton, his daughter read for him, and acted as his secretary. In his Portrait of himself, he said—"I awake in the morning rejoiced at the sight of day. I see the sun with a kind of ecstasy, and for the rest of the day I am content. I pass the night without waking, and in the evening when I go to bed, a kind of numbness prevents me indulging in reflections. With me, study has been the sovereign remedy against disgust of life, having never had any vexation which an hour's reading has not dissipated. But I have the disease of making books, and of being ashamed when I have made them."

The room where Montesquieu wrote his Spirit of the Laws is still displayed at his family home; it's adorned with old tapestries and curtains, and the comfy chair he used is carefully preserved there.[Pg 53] The fireplace mantel shows the imprint of his foot, where he would rest it, legs crossed, while writing his books. He wrote his Persian Letters just for fun and never meant for them to be published. His focus was on the principles of laws, which occupied twenty years of his life, during which he sacrificed his health and eyesight. Like Milton, his daughter read to him and served as his secretary. In his self-portrait, he said, “I wake up in the morning thrilled to see the day. I look at the sun with a kind of joy, and for the rest of the day, I feel content. I sleep through the night without waking, and when I go to bed in the evening, a sort of numbness keeps me from reflecting. For me, studying has been the best remedy against dissatisfaction with life, as I’ve never faced any frustration that an hour of reading hasn’t relieved. But I suffer from the urge to write books and then feel embarrassed when I do.”

Rousseau had the greatest difficulty in composing his works, being extremely defective in the gift of memory. He could never learn six verses by heart. In his Confessions he says—"I studied and meditated in bed, forming sentences with inconceivable difficulty; then, when I thought I had got them into shape, I would rise to put them on paper. But lo! I often entirely forgot them during the process of dressing!" He would then walk abroad to refresh himself by the aspect of nature, and under its influence his most successful writings were composed. He was always leaving books which he carried about with him at the foot of trees, or by the margin of fountains. He sometimes wrote his books over from beginning to end, four or five times, before giving them to the press. Some of his sentences cost him four or five nights' study. He thought with difficulty, and wrote with still greater. It is astonishing that, with such a kind of intellect, he should have been able to do so much.

Rousseau struggled greatly to write his works because he had a serious issue with his memory. He could never memorize six lines of verse. In his Confessions, he says, “I studied and pondered in bed, creating sentences with incredible difficulty; then, when I thought I had shaped them right, I would get up to write them down. But, surprisingly! I often completely forgot them while getting dressed!” He would then go outside to refresh himself with nature, and under its influence, he produced some of his best writing. He often left books he carried with him at the base of trees or by the edges of fountains. Sometimes he would rewrite his books from start to finish four or five times before sending them to print. Some of his sentences took him four or five nights of study. He found it hard to think and even harder to write. It's remarkable that, with such a mind, he was able to accomplish so much.

The summer study of the famous Buffon, at Montbar, is still shown, just as he left it. It is a little room in a pavilion, reached by mounting a ladder, through a green door with two folds. The place looks simplicity itself. The apartment is vaulted like some old chapel, and the walls are painted green. The floor is paved with tiles. A writing-table of plain wood stands in the centre, and before it is an easy chair. That is all! The place was the summer study of Buffon. In winter, he had a warmer room within his house, where he wrote his Natural History. There, on his desk, his pen still lies, and by the side of it, on his easy chair, his red dressing-gown and cap of gray silk. On the wall near to where he sat, hangs an engraved portrait of Newton. There, and in his garden cabinet, he spent many years of his life, studying and writing books. He studied his work entitled Epoques de la Nature for fifty years, and wrote it over eighteen times before publishing it! What would our galloping authors say to that?

The summer study of the famous Buffon at Montbar is still displayed just as he left it. It's a small room in a pavilion that you reach by climbing a ladder through a green double door. The space is incredibly simple. The room has a vaulted ceiling like an old chapel, and the walls are painted green. The floor is tiled. In the center, there's a plain wooden writing table, and in front of it is a comfortable chair. That's all! This was Buffon's summer study. In winter, he used a warmer room in his house where he wrote his Natural History. There, on his desk, his pen still rests, and on his easy chair are his red robe and a gray silk cap. On the wall near where he sat hangs an engraved portrait of Newton. He spent many years of his life there and in his garden cabinet, studying and writing books. He worked on his piece titled Epoques de la Nature for fifty years, rewriting it eighteen times before it was published! What would our fast-paced authors think of that?

Buffon used to work on pages of five distinct columns, like a ledger. In the first column he[Pg 54] wrote out the first draught; in the second he corrected, added, pruned, and improved; thus proceeding until he had reached the fifth column, in which he finally wrote out the result of his labor. But this was not all. He would sometimes re-write a sentence twenty times, and was once fourteen hours in finding the proper word for the turning of a period! Buffon knew nearly all his works by heart.

Buffon used to work on pages with five distinct columns, like a ledger. In the first column, he[Pg 54] wrote the initial draft; in the second, he corrected, added, refined, and improved; he continued this process until he reached the fifth column, where he finally wrote out the result of his work. But that wasn’t all. He would sometimes rewrite a sentence twenty times and once spent fourteen hours searching for the right word for a single phrase! Buffon nearly knew all his works by heart.

On the contrary, Cuvier never re-copied what he had once written. He composed with great rapidity, correctness, and precision. His mind was always in complete order, and his memory was exact and extensive.

On the other hand, Cuvier never rewrote what he had previously written. He created with incredible speed, accuracy, and clarity. His mind was always well-organized, and his memory was precise and vast.

Some writers have been prodigiously laborious in the composition of their works. Cæsar had, of course, an immense multiplicity of business, as a general, to get through; but he had always a secretary by his side, even when on horseback, to whom he dictated; and often he occupied two or three secretaries at once. His famous Commentaries are said to have been composed mostly on horseback.

Some writers have worked incredibly hard to create their works. Cæsar, as a general, had a huge amount of responsibilities to manage; however, he always had a secretary with him, even when riding a horse, to whom he dictated. Often, he would use two or three secretaries at the same time. His well-known Commentaries are said to have been mainly written while he was on horseback.

Seneca was very laborious. "I have not a single idle day," said he, describing his life, "and I give a part of every night to study. I do not give myself up to sleep, but succumb to it. I have separated myself from society, and renounced all the distractions of life." With many of these old heathens, study was their religion.

Seneca worked extremely hard. "I don't have a single lazy day," he said while describing his life, "and I spend part of every night studying. I don’t choose to sleep; I just give in to it. I've cut myself off from society and given up all the distractions of life." For many of these ancient non-believers, studying was their form of worship.

Pliny the Elder read two thousand volumes in the composition of his Natural History. How to find time for this? He managed it by devoting his days to business and his nights to study. He had books read to him while he was at meals; and he read no book without making extracts. His nephew, Pliny the Younger, has given a highly interesting account of the intimate and daily life of his uncle.

Pliny the Elder read two thousand books while writing his Natural History. How did he find the time for that? He spent his days working and his nights studying. He had books read to him during meals, and he never read a book without taking notes. His nephew, Pliny the Younger, provided a fascinating account of his uncle's close and everyday life.

Origen employed seven writers while composing his Commentaries, who committed to paper what he dictated to them by turns. He was so indefatigable in writing that they gave him the name of Brass Bowels! Like Philip de Comines, Sully used to dictate to four secretaries at a time, without difficulty.

Origen employed seven writers while composing his Commentaries, who took turns writing down what he dictated to them. He was so tireless in writing that they nicknamed him Brass Bowels! Similar to Philip de Comines, Sully would dictate to four secretaries at once, effortlessly.

Bossuet left fifty volumes of writings behind him, the result of unintermitting labor. The pen rarely quitted his fingers. Writing became habitual to him, and he even chose it as a relaxation. A night-lamp was constantly lit beside him, and he would rise at all hours to resume his meditations. He rose at about four o'clock in the morning during summer and winter, wrapped himself in his loose dress of bear's skin, and set to work. He worked on for hours, until he felt fatigued, and then went to bed again, falling asleep at once. This life he led for more than twenty years. As he grew older, and became disabled for hard work, he began translating the Psalms into verse, to pass time. In the intervals of fatigue and pain, he read and corrected his former works.

Bossuet left fifty volumes of writings behind him, the result of constant effort. The pen rarely left his hands. Writing became a part of his routine, and he even chose it as a way to unwind. A night lamp was always lit beside him, and he would get up at all hours to continue his thoughts. He woke up around four o'clock in the morning, both in summer and winter, wrapped himself in his loose bear-skin robe, and got to work. He would work for hours until he felt tired and then go back to bed, falling asleep instantly. He lived this way for over twenty years. As he got older and found it harder to do demanding work, he started translating the Psalms into verse to keep himself occupied. During breaks from fatigue and pain, he read and revised his earlier works.

Some writers composed with great rapidity, others slowly and with difficulty. Byron said of[Pg 55] himself, that though he felt driven to write, and he was in a state of torture until he had fairly delivered himself of what he had to say, yet that writing never gave him any pleasure, but was felt to be a severe labor. Scott, on the contrary, possessed the most extraordinary facility; and dashed off a great novel of three volumes in about the same number of weeks.

Some writers create their work quickly, while others take their time and struggle. Byron remarked about himself that even though he felt compelled to write and was in agony until he expressed what he needed to say, he never found joy in writing; it felt like hard work to him. Scott, on the other hand, had an incredible ease with writing and completed a three-volume novel in roughly the same number of weeks.

"I have written Catiline in eight days," said Voltaire; "and I immediately commenced the Henriade." Voltaire was a most impatient writer, and usually had the first half of a work set up in type before the second half was written. He always had several works in the course of composition at the same time. His manner of preparing a work was peculiar. He had his first sketch of a tragedy set up in type, and then rewrote it from the proofs. Balzac adopted the same plan. The printed form enabled them to introduce effects, and correct errors more easily.

"I wrote Catiline in eight days," Voltaire said; "and I immediately started on the Henriade." Voltaire was an extremely impatient writer and often had the first half of a work typeset before he finished the second half. He usually worked on several projects at once. His approach to preparing a work was unique. He would have his initial draft of a tragedy typeset and then rewrite it based on the proofs. Balzac followed the same method. The printed format allowed them to more easily introduce effects and correct mistakes.

Pascal wrote most of his thoughts on little scraps of paper, at his by-moments of leisure. He produced them with immense rapidity. He wrote in a kind of contracted language—like short hand—impossible to read, except by those who had studied it. It resembled the impatient and fiery scratches of Napoleon; yet, though half-formed, the characters have the firmness and precision of the graver. Some one observed to Faguere (Pascal's editor), "This work (deciphering it) must be very fatiguing to the eyes." "No," said he, "it is not the eyes that are fatigued, so much as the brain."

Pascal jotted down most of his thoughts on small pieces of paper during his free time. He wrote them down quickly and in a sort of shorthand that was hard to read, except for those who had learned it. It was similar to the hasty and intense scribbles of Napoleon; yet, even though the letters were half-formed, they had the firmness and precision of an engraver's work. Someone remarked to Faguere (Pascal's editor), "Decoding this must be really tiring for the eyes." "No," he replied, "it's not the eyes that get tired, but rather the brain."

Many authors have been distinguished for the fastidiousness of their composition—never resting satisfied, but correcting and re-correcting to the last moment. Cicero spent his old age in correcting his orations; Massillon in polishing his sermons; Fenelon corrected his Telemachus seven times over.

Many authors are known for their attention to detail in their writing—never feeling satisfied, always revising and refining right up to the last minute. Cicero spent his later years improving his speeches; Massillon focused on perfecting his sermons; Fenelon revised his Telemachus seven times.

Of thirty verses which Virgil wrote in the morning, there were only ten left at night. Milton often cut down forty verses to twenty. Buffon would condense six pages into as many paragraphs. Montaigne, instead of cutting down, amplified and added to his first sketch. Boileau had great difficulty in making his verses. He said—"If I write four words, I erase three of them;" and at another time—"I sometimes hunt three hours for a rhyme!"

Of the thirty lines that Virgil wrote in the morning, only ten remained by night. Milton often reduced forty lines to twenty. Buffon could summarize six pages into a few paragraphs. Montaigne, instead of cutting back, expanded and added to his initial draft. Boileau struggled with his lines. He said, "If I write four words, I erase three of them," and at another time, "I sometimes spend three hours searching for a rhyme!"

Some authors were never satisfied with their work. Virgil ordered his Æneid to be burnt. Voltaire cast his poem of The League into the fire. Racine and Scott could not bear to read their productions again. Michael Angelo was always dissatisfied; he found faults in his greatest and most admired works.

Some authors were never happy with their work. Virgil had his Æneid burned. Voltaire threw his poem The League into the fire. Racine and Scott couldn't stand to read their works again. Michelangelo was always unhappy; he found flaws in his greatest and most celebrated pieces.

Many of the most admired writings were never intended by their authors for publication. Fenelon, when he wrote Telemachus, had no intention of publishing it. Voltaire's Correspondence was never intended for publication, and yet it is perused with avidity; whereas his Henriade, so often corrected by him, is scarcely read. Madame de Sevigní, in writing to her daughter those fascinating letters descriptive of the life of the[Pg 56] French Court, never had any idea of their publication, or that they would be cited as models of composition and style. What work of Johnson's is best known? Is it not that by Boswell, which contains the great philosopher's conversation?—that which he never intended should come to light, and for which we have to thank Bozzy.

Many of the most admired writings were never meant by their authors to be published. When Fenelon wrote Telemachus, he had no intention of releasing it. Voltaire's Correspondence was never meant for publication either, yet it's read with enthusiasm; meanwhile, his Henriade, which he revised many times, is hardly ever read. Madame de Sevigné, in writing those captivating letters to her daughter about life at the[Pg 56] French Court, never thought they would be published or recognized as examples of composition and style. What of Johnson's works is most well-known? Isn’t it the one by Boswell, which captures the philosopher's conversations?—the one he never intended to be released, and for which we owe thanks to Bozzy.

There is a great difference in the sensitiveness of authors to criticism. Sir Walter Scott passed thirteen years without reading what the critics or reviewers said of his writings; while Byron was sensitive to an excess about what was said of him. It was the reviewers who stung him into his first work of genius—English Bards and Scotch Reviewers. Racine was very sensitive to criticism; and poor Keats was "snuffed out by an article." Moliere was thrown into a great rage when his plays were badly acted. One day, after Tartuffe had been played, an actor found him stamping about as if mad, and beating his head, crying—"Ah! dog! Ah! butcher!" On being asked what was the matter, he replied—"Don't be surprised at my emotion! I have just been seeing an actor falsely and execrably declaiming my piece; and I can not see my children maltreated in this horrid way, without suffering the tortures of the damned!" The first time Voltaire's Artemise was played, it was hissed. Voltaire, indignant, sprang to his feet in his box, and addressed the audience! At another time, at Lausanne, where an actress seemed fully to apprehend his meaning, he rushed upon the stage and embraced her knees!

There is a big difference in how sensitive authors are to criticism. Sir Walter Scott went thirteen years without reading what critics or reviewers said about his work, while Byron was overly sensitive to any comments made about him. It was the reviewers who pushed him to create his first masterpiece—English Bards and Scotch Reviewers. Racine was very sensitive to criticism, and poor Keats was "snuffed out by an article." Moliere would get extremely angry when his plays were performed poorly. One day, after Tartuffe had been performed, an actor found him pacing around like he was mad, banging his head and shouting—"Ah! dog! Ah! butcher!" When asked what was wrong, he replied—"Don't be surprised by my emotions! I just witnessed an actor poorly and atrociously performing my work; I can't watch my creations being mistreated like this without feeling tortures of the damned!" The first time Voltaire's Artemise was performed, it was hissed. Indignant, Voltaire leaped to his feet in his box and addressed the audience! Another time, in Lausanne, when an actress seemed to fully understand his meaning, he rushed onto the stage and embraced her knees!

A great deal might be said about the first failures of authors and orators. Demosthenes stammered, and was almost inaudible, when he first tried to speak before Philip. He seemed like a man moribund. Other orators have broken down, like Demosthenes, in their first effort. Curran tried to speak, for the first time, at a meeting of the Irish Historical Society; but the words died on his lips, and he sat down amid titters—an individual present characterizing him as orator Mum. Boileau broke down as an advocate, and so did Cowper, the poet. Montesquieu and Bentham were also failures in the same profession, but mainly through disgust with it. Addison, when a member of the House of Commons, once rose to speak, but he could not overcome his diffidence, and ever after remained silent.

A lot could be said about the early failures of writers and speakers. Demosthenes stuttered and was almost inaudible when he first tried to speak in front of Philip. He looked like a man near death. Other speakers have also faltered like Demosthenes did during their first attempt. Curran tried to speak for the first time at a meeting of the Irish Historical Society, but the words died on his lips, and he sat down amid chuckles, with someone in the audience calling him orator Mum. Boileau failed as an advocate, and so did the poet Cowper. Montesquieu and Bentham also struggled in the same field, mainly out of disgust for it. Addison, when he was a member of the House of Commons, once got up to speak, but he couldn't overcome his shyness, and afterward, he remained silent.


OSTRICHES.
HOW THEY ARE HUNTED.

The family of birds, of which the ostrich forms the leading type, is remarkable for the wide dispersion of its various members; the ostrich itself spreads over nearly the whole of the burning deserts of Africa—the Cassowary represents it amid the luxuriant vegetation of the Indian Archipelago. The Dinornis, chief of birds, formerly towered among the ferns of New Zealand, where the small Apteryx now holds its place; and the huge Æpyornis strode along the forests of Madagascar. The Emu is confined to the great Australian continent, and the Rhea to the southern extremity of the western[Pg 57] hemisphere; while nearer home we find the class represented by the Bustard, which, until within a few years, still lingered upon the least frequented downs and plains of England.

The family of birds, with the ostrich as its most prominent member, is notable for the wide distribution of its various species. The ostrich itself can be found across almost all of Africa's scorching deserts, while the Cassowary thrives in the lush vegetation of the Indian Archipelago. The Dinornis, once the largest bird, roamed among the ferns of New Zealand, a place now occupied by the small Apteryx, and the massive Æpyornis walked through the forests of Madagascar. The Emu is limited to the vast continent of Australia, and the Rhea is found only in the southern part of the western hemisphere; meanwhile, closer to home, the Bustard represented the family and, until a few years ago, could still be seen in the less traveled downs and plains of England.

With the Arabs of the desert, the chase of the ostrich is the most attractive and eagerly sought of the many aristocratic diversions in which they indulge. The first point attended to, is a special preparation of their horses. Seven or eight days before the intended hunt, they are entirely deprived of straw and grass, and fed on barley only. They are only allowed to drink once a day, and that at sunset—the time when the water begins to freshen: at that time also they are washed. They take long daily exercises, and are occasionally galloped, at which time care is taken that the harness is right, and suited to the chase of the ostrich. "After seven or eight days," says the Arab, "the stomach of the horse disappears, while the chest, the breast, and the croup remain in flesh; the animal is then fit to endure fatigue." They call this training techaha. The harness used for the purpose in question is lighter than ordinary, especially the stirrups and saddle, and the martingale is removed. The bridle, too, undergoes many metamorphoses; the mountings and the ear-flaps are taken away, as too heavy. The bit is made of a camel rope, without a throat-band, and the frontlet is also of cord, and the reins, though strong, are very light. The period most favorable for ostrich-hunting is that of the great heat; the higher the temperature the less is the ostrich able to defend himself. The Arabs describe the precise time as that, when a man stands upright, his shadow has the length only of the sole of his foot.

With the desert Arabs, hunting ostriches is one of the most exciting and highly regarded activities they enjoy. The first thing they focus on is getting their horses ready. About seven or eight days before the planned hunt, they completely stop feeding them straw and grass, giving them only barley instead. The horses are permitted to drink once a day, and only at sunset—the moment when the water becomes refreshing. It’s also when they wash the horses. They go through long daily exercises and are sometimes galloped, making sure that the harness is correct and suitable for ostrich hunting. "After seven or eight days," an Arab says, "the horse's belly shrinks while the chest, breast, and hindquarters stay muscular; the animal is then ready for hard work." They call this training techaha. The harness used for this is lighter than usual, especially the stirrups and saddle, and the martingale is removed. The bridle is also modified in numerous ways; the attachments and ear-flaps are taken off, as they are too heavy. The bit is made from a camel rope, without a throat-band, and the frontlet is also made of cord, with the reins being strong yet very light. The best time for ostrich hunting is during the hottest weather; the hotter it is, the less able the ostrich is to defend itself. The Arabs say this perfect moment is when a man stands straight and his shadow is only as long as his foot.

Each horseman is accompanied by a servant called zemmal, mounted on a camel, carrying four goat-skins filled with water, barley for the horse, wheat-flour for the rider, some dates, a kettle to cook the food, and every thing which can possibly be required for the repair of the harness. The horseman contents himself with a linen vest and trowsers, and covers his neck and ears with a light material called havuli, tied with a strip of camel's hide; his feet are protected with sandals, and his legs with light gaiters called trabag. He is armed with neither gun nor pistol, his only weapon being a wild olive or tamarind stick, five or six feet long, with a heavy knob at one end.

Each horseman is accompanied by a servant called zemmal, who rides a camel and carries four goat-skins filled with water, barley for the horse, wheat flour for the rider, some dates, a kettle to cook food, and everything else needed for repairing the harness. The horseman wears a linen vest and trousers, covering his neck and ears with a lightweight material called havuli, which is tied with a strip of camel's hide; his feet are protected by sandals, and his legs by light gaiters known as trabag. He isn’t armed with a gun or pistol; his only weapon is a wild olive or tamarind stick, about five or six feet long, with a heavy knob at one end.

Before starting, the hunters ascertain where a large number of ostriches are to be found. These birds are generally met with in places where there is much grass, and where rain has recently fallen. The Arabs say, that where the ostrich sees the light shine, and barley getting ready, wherever it may be, thither she runs, regardless of distance; and ten days' march is nothing to her; and it has passed into a proverb in the desert, of a man skillful in the care of flocks, and in finding pasturage, that he is like the ostrich, where he sees the light there he comes.

Before starting, the hunters find out where a lot of ostriches can be found. These birds are usually seen in areas with plenty of grass and where it has recently rained. The Arabs say that wherever the ostrich sees the light shining and barley ripening, no matter the distance, it runs towards it; a ten-day journey is nothing to her. This has become a saying in the desert about a person skilled in looking after herds and finding good grazing land: he is like the ostrich; wherever he sees the light, there he goes.

The hunters start in the morning. After one or two days' journey, when they have arrived[Pg 58] near the spot pointed out, and they begin to perceive traces of their game, they halt and camp. The next day, two intelligent slaves, almost entirely stripped, are sent to reconnoitre; they each carry a goat-skin at their side, and a little bread; they walk until they meet with the ostriches, which are generally found in elevated places. As soon as the game is in view, one lies down to watch, the other returns to convey the information. The ostriches are found in troops, comprising sometimes as many as sixty: but at the pairing time they are more scattered, three or four couple only remaining together.

The hunters set out in the morning. After traveling for one or two days, when they arrive[Pg 58] near the designated spot and start to notice signs of their game, they stop and set up camp. The next day, two sharp slaves, almost completely undressed, are sent to scout the area; each carries a goat-skin pouch at their side and a bit of bread. They walk until they find the ostriches, which are usually located in higher ground. As soon as they spot the game, one lies down to keep watch while the other goes back to report. The ostriches are found in groups, sometimes numbering as many as sixty: but during mating season, they tend to be more spread out, with only three or four pairs staying together.

The horsemen, guided by the scout, travel gently toward the birds; the nearer they approach the spot the greater is their caution, and when they reach the last ridge which conceals them from the view of their game, they dismount, and two creep forward to ascertain if they are still there. Should such be the case, a moderate quantity of water is given to the horses, the baggage is left, and each man mounts, carrying at his side a chebouta, or goat-skin. The servants and camels follow the track of the horsemen, carrying with them only a little corn and water.

The horsemen, led by the scout, move quietly toward the birds; the closer they get, the more careful they become, and when they reach the last ridge that hides them from sight, they get off their horses. Two of them sneak forward to see if the birds are still there. If they are, they give the horses a small amount of water, leave the baggage behind, and each man gets back on his horse with a chebouta, or goat-skin, at his side. The servants and camels follow the horsemen, carrying just a little corn and water.

The exact position of the ostriches being known, the plans are arranged; the horsemen divide and form a circle round the game at such a distance as not to be seen. The servants wait where the horsemen have separated, and as soon as they see them at their posts, they walk right before them; the ostriches fly, but are met by the hunters, who do nothing at first but drive them back into the circle; thus their strength is exhausted by being made to continually run round in the ring. At the first signs of fatigue in the birds, the horsemen dash in—presently the flock separates; the exhausted birds are seen to open their wings, which is a sign of great exhaustion; the horsemen, certain of their prey, now repress their horses; each hunter selects his ostrich, runs it down, and finishes it by a blow on the head with the stick above mentioned. The moment the bird falls the man jumps off his horse, and cuts her throat, taking care to hold the neck at such a distance from the body, as not to soil the plumage of the wings. The male bird, while dying, utters loud moans, but the female dies in silence.

The exact location of the ostriches being known, the plans are set; the horsemen split up and form a circle around the game at a distance that keeps them out of sight. The helpers wait where the horsemen have separated, and as soon as they see them in position, they walk right in front of them; the ostriches take off, but the hunters just push them back into the circle; this tires them out as they keep running around the ring. At the first signs of fatigue in the birds, the horsemen charge in—soon the flock scatters; the tired birds spread their wings, which signals that they're exhausted; the horsemen, confident in their catch, now hold back their horses; each hunter picks his ostrich, chases it down, and finishes it off with a blow to the head using the stick mentioned earlier. As soon as the bird falls, the man jumps off his horse and cuts her throat, making sure to hold the neck away from the body to avoid staining the wings' feathers. The male bird, as it dies, lets out loud cries, but the female dies quietly.

When the ostrich is on the point of being overtaken by the hunter, she is so fatigued, that if he does not wish to kill her, she can easily be driven with the stick to the neighborhood of the camels. Immediately after the birds have been bled to death, they are carefully skinned, so that the feathers may not be injured, and the skin is then stretched upon a tree, or on a horse, and salt rubbed well into it. A fire is lit, and the fat of the birds is boiled for a long time in kettles; when very liquid, it is poured into a sort of bottle made of the skin of the thigh and leg down to the foot, strongly fastened at the bottom; the fat of one bird is usually sufficient to fill two of these legs; it is said that in any other vessel the fat would spoil. When, however, the bird is breeding, she is extremely lean, and is[Pg 59] then hunted only for the sake of her feathers. After these arrangements are completed, the flesh is eaten by the hunters, who season it well with pepper and flour.

When the ostrich is about to be caught by the hunter, she is so exhausted that if he doesn't want to kill her, he can easily drive her with a stick towards the camels. Right after the birds have been bled to death, they are carefully skinned to avoid damaging the feathers, and the skin is then stretched on a tree or a horse, with salt rubbed into it. A fire is started, and the fat of the birds is boiled for a long time in kettles; when it becomes very liquid, it is poured into a special container made from the skin of the thigh and leg down to the foot, tightly secured at the bottom; the fat from one bird usually fills two of these legs, as it's said that in any other container the fat would spoil. However, when the bird is breeding, she is extremely lean and is[Pg 59] hunted only for her feathers. Once these preparations are finished, the hunters eat the flesh, seasoning it well with pepper and flour.

While these proceedings are in progress, the horses are carefully tended, watered, and fed with corn, and the party remain quiet during forty-eight hours, to give their animals rest; after that they either return to their encampment, or embark in new enterprises.

While this is happening, the horses are taken care of, given water, and fed corn, and the group stays quiet for forty-eight hours to let their animals rest; after that, they either go back to their camp or start new ventures.

To the Arab the chase of the ostrich has a double attraction—pleasure and profit; the price obtained for the skins well compensates for the expenses. Not only do the rich enjoy the pursuit, but the poor, who know how to set about it, are permitted to participate in it also. The usual plan is for a poor Arab to arrange with one who is opulent for the loan of his camel, horse, harness, and two-thirds of all the necessary provisions. The borrower furnishes himself the remaining third, and the produce of the chase is divided in the same proportions.

To Arabs, hunting ostriches is appealing for two reasons—it's fun and profitable; the money made from the skins more than covers the costs. Not only do the wealthy enjoy this pursuit, but the less fortunate, who know how to go about it, can join in as well. Typically, a poor Arab partners with a wealthy one to borrow a camel, horse, gear, and two-thirds of the supplies needed. The borrower provides the remaining third, and the spoils from the hunt are split in the same way.

The ostrich, like many other of the feathered tribe, has a great deal of self-conceit. On fine sunny days a tame bird may be seen strutting backward and forward with great majesty, fanning itself with its quivering, expanded wings, and at every turn seeming to admire its grace, and the elegance of its shadow. Dr. Shaw says that, though these birds appear tame and tractable to persons well-known to them, they are often very fierce and violent toward strangers, whom they would not only endeavor to push down by running furiously against them, but they would peck at them with their beaks, and strike with their feet; and so violent is the blow that can be given, that the doctor saw a person whose abdomen had been ripped completely open by a stroke from the claw of an ostrich.

The ostrich, like many other birds, has a lot of self-importance. On beautiful sunny days, a domesticated bird can be seen strutting back and forth with great pride, fanning itself with its fluttering, outstretched wings, and at every turn, it seems to admire its own grace and the beauty of its shadow. Dr. Shaw mentions that while these birds seem tame and friendly to people they know well, they can be very aggressive and violent towards strangers. They not only try to knock them down by charging at them but will also peck at them with their beaks and strike with their feet. The force of their blow can be so severe that the doctor witnessed a person whose abdomen was completely torn open by a strike from an ostrich's claw.

To have the stomach of an ostrich has become proverbial, and with good reason; for this bird stands enviably forward in respect to its wonderful powers of digestion, which are scarcely inferior to its voracity. Its natural food consists entirely of vegetable substances, especially grain; and the ostrich is a most destructive enemy to the crops of the African farmers. But its sense of taste is so obtuse, that scraps of leather, old nails, bits of tin, buttons, keys, coins, and pebbles, are devoured with equal relish; in fact, nothing comes amiss. But in this it doubtless follows an instinct: for these hard bodies assist, like the gravel in the crops of our domestic poultry, in grinding down and preparing for digestion its ordinary food.

To have the stomach of an ostrich has become a well-known saying, and for good reason; this bird is remarkable for its impressive digestion, which is nearly as notable as its appetite. Its diet consists entirely of plant materials, especially grains, making the ostrich a serious threat to the crops of African farmers. However, its sense of taste is so dull that it eats scraps of leather, old nails, bits of tin, buttons, keys, coins, and pebbles with the same enjoyment; in fact, it doesn’t reject anything. This behavior is likely driven by instinct because these hard items help, much like the gravel in the crops of our domestic poultry, to grind up and prepare its regular food for digestion.

There was found by Cuvier in the stomach of an ostrich that died at Paris, nearly a pound weight of stones, bits of iron and copper, and pieces of money worn down by constant attrition against each other, as well as by the action of the stomach itself. In the stomach of one of these birds which belonged to the menagerie of George the Fourth, there were contained some pieces of wood of considerable size, several large nails, and a hen's egg entire and uninjured, perhaps taken as a delicacy from its appetite becoming[Pg 60] capricious. In the stomach of another, beside several large cabbage-stalks, there were masses of bricks of the size of a man's fist. Sparrman relates that he saw ostriches at the Cape so tame that they went loose to and from the farm, but they were so voracious as to swallow chickens whole, and trample hens to death, that they might tear them in pieces afterward and devour them; and one great barrel of a bird was obliged to be killed on account of an awkward habit he had acquired of trampling sheep to death. But perhaps the most striking proof of the prowess of an ostrich in the eating way, is that afforded by Dr. Shaw, who saw one swallow bullet after bullet as fast as they were pitched, scorching hot, from the mould.

Cuvier discovered nearly a pound of stones, bits of iron and copper, and coins worn down from constant rubbing against each other in the stomach of an ostrich that died in Paris. One of the birds from George the Fourth's menagerie had large pieces of wood, several big nails, and an intact hen's egg in its stomach, possibly taken because its appetite was being a bit picky. Another ostrich's stomach contained several large cabbage stalks and fist-sized chunks of brick. Sparrman noted that he saw ostriches at the Cape that were so tame they roamed freely to and from the farm, yet they were so greedy they would swallow chickens whole and trample hens to death just to tear them apart and eat them afterward. One particularly large bird had to be killed because it developed a bad habit of trampling sheep to death. But perhaps the most remarkable example of an ostrich's eating abilities comes from Dr. Shaw, who witnessed one swallowing hot bullets as quickly as they were thrown from the mold.


A DULL TOWN.

Putting up for the night in one of the chiefest towns of Staffordshire, I find it to be by no means a lively town. In fact, it is as dull and dead a town as any one could desire not to see. It seems as if its whole population might be imprisoned in its Railway Station. The Refreshment-room at that station is a vortex of dissipation compared with the extinct town-inn, the Dodo, in the dull High-street.

Putting up for the night in one of the main towns in Staffordshire, I discover it’s far from lively. In fact, it's as boring and lifeless as any place you'd want to avoid. It feels as though the entire population could be locked away in the Railway Station. The Refreshment room at that station is a hub of activity compared to the dead town inn, the Dodo, in the quiet High Street.

Why High-street? Why not rather Low-street, Flat-street, Low-spirited-street, Used-up-street? Where are the people who belong to the High-street? Can they all be dispersed over the face of the country, seeking the unfortunate Strolling Manager who decamped from the mouldy little theatre last week, in the beginning of his season (as his play-bills testify), repentantly resolved to bring him back, and feed him, and be entertained? Or, can they all be gathered to their fathers in the two old church-yards near to the High-street—retirement into which church-yards appears to be a mere ceremony, there is so very little life outside their confines, and such small discernible difference between being buried alive in the town, and buried dead in the town-tombs? Over the way, opposite to the staring blank bow windows of the Dodo, are a little ironmonger's shop, a little tailor's shop (with a picture of the fashions in the small window and a bandy-legged baby on the pavement staring at it)—a watchmaker's shop, where all the clocks and watches must be stopped, I am sure, for they could never have the courage to go, with the town in general, and the Dodo in particular, looking at them. Shade of Miss Linwood, erst of Leicester-square, London, thou art welcome here, and thy retreat is fitly chosen! I myself was one of the last visitors to that awful storehouse of thy life's work, where an anchorite old man and woman took my shilling with a solemn wonder, and conducting me to a gloomy sepulchre of needlework dropping to pieces with dust and age, and shrouded in twilight at high noon, left me there, chilled, frightened, and alone. And now, in ghostly letters on all the dead walls of this dead town, I read thy honored name, and find, that thy Last Supper, worked in Berlin Wool, invites inspection as a powerful excitement!

Why High Street? Why not Low Street, Flat Street, Low-Spirited Street, Used-Up Street? Where are the people who belong to High Street? Are they all scattered across the country, looking for the unfortunate Strolling Manager who fled from the musty little theater last week at the start of his season (as his playbills show), now regretfully determined to bring him back, support him, and be entertained? Or have they all gone to rest in the two old graveyards near High Street—places where the act of being buried seems more like a formality, as there's so little life outside their borders, and not much difference between being buried alive in town and buried dead in the town tombs? Across the street from the glaring blank bay windows of the Dodo, there are a little ironmonger's shop and a little tailor's shop (with a picture of the latest fashions in the small window and a bandy-legged baby on the pavement staring at it)—a watchmaker's shop, where I’m sure all the clocks and watches must be stopped, since they could never have the nerve to go on ticking with the town in general, and the Dodo in particular, watching them. Shade of Miss Linwood, once of Leicester Square, London, you are welcome here, and your retreat is well chosen! I was one of the last visitors to that dreadful storehouse of your life's work, where an ancient man and woman took my shilling with a solemn curiosity, and led me to a dark tomb of needlework decaying with dust and age, shrouded in twilight at noon, leaving me there, chilled, scared, and alone. And now, in ghostly letters on all the dead walls of this lifeless town, I read your honored name and see that your Last Supper, worked in Berlin Wool, invites attention as a thrilling spectacle!

Where are the people who are bidden with so much cry to this feast of little wool? Where are they? Who are they? They are not the bandy-legged baby studying the fashions in the tailor's window. They are not the two earthy plow-men lounging outside the saddler's shop, in the stiff square where the Town Hall stands, like a brick-and-mortar private on parade. They are not the landlady of the Dodo in the empty bar, whose eye had trouble in it and no welcome, when I asked for dinner. They are not the turnkeys of the Town Jail, looking out of the gateway in their uniforms, as if they had locked up all the balance (as my American friends would say) of the inhabitants, and could now rest a little. They are not the two dusty millers in the white mill down by the river, where the great water-wheel goes heavily round and round, like the monotonous days and nights in this forgotten place. Then who are they? for there is no one else. No; this deponent maketh oath and saith that there is no one else, save and except the waiter at the Dodo, now laying the cloth. I have paced the streets, and stared at the houses, and am come back to the blank bow-window of the Dodo; and the town-clock strikes seven, and the reluctant echoes seem to cry, "Don't wake us!" and the bandy-legged baby has gone home to bed.

Where are the people who are called so loudly to this feast of little wool? Where are they? Who are they? They aren’t the pigeon-toed kid checking out the styles in the tailor's window. They aren’t the two earthy farmers hanging out outside the saddler's shop in the rigid square where the Town Hall stands, like a soldier on parade. They aren’t the landlady of the Dodo in the empty bar, who didn’t seem welcoming when I asked for dinner. They aren’t the guards at the Town Jail, peering out of the entrance in their uniforms, as if they had locked up all the rest (as my American friends would say) of the townsfolk and could finally take a break. They aren’t the two dusty millers at the white mill by the river, where the big water-wheel turns slowly, like the unchanging days and nights in this forgotten place. So who are they? Because there’s no one else. No; I swear there’s no one else, except for the waiter at the Dodo, who’s now setting the table. I’ve walked the streets, stared at the houses, and come back to the empty bow-window of the Dodo; the town clock strikes seven, and the hesitant echoes seem to say, “Don’t wake us!” and the pigeon-toed kid has gone home to bed.

If the Dodo were only a gregarious bird—if it had only some confused idea of making a comfortable nest—I could hope to get through the hours between this and bed-time, without being consumed by devouring melancholy. But the Dodo's habits are all wrong. It provides me with a trackless desert of sitting-room, with a chair for every day in the year, a table for every month, and a waste of sideboard where a lonely China vase pines in a corner for its mate long departed, and will never make a match with the candlestick in the opposite corner if it live till doomsday. The Dodo has nothing in the larder. Even now, I behold the Boots returning with my sole in a piece of paper; and with that portion of my dinner, the Boots, perceiving me at the blank bow-window, slaps his leg as he comes across the road, pretending it is something else. The Dodo excludes the outer air. When I mount up to my bed-room, a smell of closeness and flue gets lazily up my nose like sleepy snuff. The loose little bits of carpet writhe under my tread, and take wormy shapes. I don't know the ridiculous man in the looking-glass, beyond having met him once or twice in a dish-cover—and I can never shave him to-morrow morning! The Dodo is narrow-minded as to towels; expects me to wash on a freemason's apron without the trimming; when I ask for soap, gives me a stony-hearted something white, with no more lather in it than the Elgin marbles. The Dodo has seen better days, and possesses interminable stables at the back—silent, grass-grown, broken-windowed, horseless.

If the Dodo were just a social bird—if it had some idea of building a cozy nest—I could hope to get through the time before bed without being overwhelmed by deep sadness. But the Dodo's behavior is all wrong. It gives me a vast empty space to sit in, with a chair for every day of the year, a table for each month, and a wasted sideboard where a lonely China vase sits in the corner longing for its long-lost partner and will never pair up with the candlestick across the room, no matter how long it lasts. The Dodo has nothing in the pantry. Even now, I see the waiter coming back with my shoe wrapped in paper; and noticing me at the empty bow-window, he slaps his leg as he crosses the street, pretending it's something else. The Dodo shuts out fresh air. When I go up to my bedroom, a stale smell of closeness and soot drifts into my nose like a lazy puff of snuff. The little bits of carpet shift under my feet, twisting into wormy shapes. I don’t recognize the silly guy in the mirror, other than having seen him once or twice in a covered dish—and I can never shave him tomorrow morning! The Dodo is stingy when it comes to towels; expects me to wash on a plain apron without any trim; when I ask for soap, it hands me a hard, white bar that has no more lather than the Elgin marbles. The Dodo has seen better days and has endless stables out back—silent, overgrown with grass, with broken windows, and no horses.

This mournful bird can fry a sole, however, which is much. Can cook a steak, too, which is more. I wonder where it gets its Sherry! If[Pg 62] I were to send my pint of wine to some famous chemist to be analyzed, what would it turn out to be made of? It tastes of pepper, sugar, bitter almonds, vinegar, warm knives, any flat drink, and a little brandy. Would it unman a Spanish exile by reminding him of his native land at all? I think not. If there really be any townspeople out of the church-yards, and if a caravan of them ever do dine, with a bottle of wine per man, in this desert of the Dodo, it must make good for the doctor next day!

This sad bird can fry a sole, which is impressive. It can cook a steak too, which is even better. I wonder where it gets its Sherry! If[Pg 62] I were to send my pint of wine to a famous chemist for analysis, what would they find in it? It tastes like pepper, sugar, bitter almonds, vinegar, warm knives, some flat drink, and a bit of brandy. Would it bring a Spanish exile to tears by reminding him of his homeland? I doubt it. If there really are any townspeople out of the graveyards, and if a group of them ever dines, with a bottle of wine each, in this Dodo desert, it must be beneficial for the doctor the next day!

Where was the waiter born? How did he come here? Has he any hope of getting away from here? Does he ever receive a letter, or take a ride upon the railway, or see any thing but the Dodo? Perhaps he has seen the Berlin Wool. He appears to have a silent sorrow on him, and it may be that. He clears the table; draws the dingy curtains of the great bow-window, which so unwillingly consent to meet, that they must be pinned together; leaves me by the fire with my pint decanter, and a little thin funnel-shaped wine-glass, and a plate of pale biscuits—in themselves engendering desperation.

Where was the waiter born? How did he end up here? Does he have any hope of leaving this place? Does he ever get a letter, ride the train, or see anything besides the Dodo? Maybe he’s seen the Berlin Wool. He seems to carry a quiet sadness, and maybe that’s why. He clears the table, draws the grimy curtains of the big bow window, which are so reluctant to meet that they have to be pinned together; then he leaves me by the fire with my pint decanter, a small thin funnel-shaped wine glass, and a plate of pale biscuits—each one making me feel more desperate.

No book, no newspapers! I left the Arabian Nights in the railway carriage, and have nothing to read but Bradshaw, and "that way madness lies." Remembering what prisoners and shipwrecked mariners have done to exercise their minds in solitude, I repeat the multiplication table, the pence table, and the shilling table: which are all the tables I happen to know. What if I write something? The Dodo keeps no pens but steel pens; and those I always stick through the paper, and can turn to no other account.

No books, no newspapers! I left the Arabian Nights in the train carriage, and I have nothing to read except Bradshaw, and "that way madness lies." Remembering what prisoners and shipwrecked sailors have done to keep their minds active in isolation, I recite the multiplication table, the pence table, and the shilling table: which are all the tables I know. What if I write something? The Dodo only has steel pens; and those always go through the paper, and I can't use them for anything else.

What am I to do? Even if I could have the bandy-legged baby knocked up and brought here, I could offer him nothing but sherry, and that would be the death of him. He would never hold up his head again, if he touched it. I can't go to bed, because I have conceived a mortal hatred for my bedroom; and I can't go away because there is no train for my place of destination until morning. To burn the biscuits will be but a fleeting joy; still it is a temporary relief, and here they go on the fire!

What am I supposed to do? Even if I could get the bow-legged kid brought here, I could only offer him sherry, and that would kill him. He'd never lift his head again if he had any. I can't go to bed because I’ve developed a deep hatred for my bedroom, and I can’t leave since there aren't any trains to my destination until morning. Burning the biscuits would be a short-lived pleasure; still, it’s a temporary relief, so here we go—into the fire!


MY NOVEL; OR, VARIETIES IN ENGLISH LIFE.[B]

CHAPTER X.—Continued.

Randal walked home slowly. It was a cold moonlit night. Young idlers of his own years and rank passed him by, on their way from the haunts of social pleasure. They were yet in the first fair holiday of life. Life's holiday had gone from him forever. Graver men, in the various callings of masculine labor—professions, trade, the state—passed him also. Their steps might be sober, and their faces careworn; but no step had the furtive stealth of his—no face the same contracted, sinister, suspicious gloom. Only once, in a lonely thoroughfare, and on the opposite side of the way, fell a foot-fall, and glanced[Pg 63] an eye, that seemed to betray a soul in sympathy with Randal Leslie's.

Randal walked home slowly. It was a cold, moonlit night. Groups of young people his age and status passed him by, heading back from their social outings. They were still in the early days of life's pleasures. Life's joys had slipped away from him forever. Serious men, engaged in various types of work—careers, business, government—walked by him too. Their steps might have been steady, and their faces worn with worry; but none moved with the same furtive stealth as he did—no face wore the same tense, dark, suspicious look. Only once, in a quiet street, did he hear footsteps on the opposite side and catch a glimpse of someone who seemed to share a deep connection with Randal Leslie.

And Randal, who had heeded none of the other passengers by the way, as if instinctively, took note of this one. His nerves crisped at the noiseless slide of that form, as it stalked on from lamp to lamp, keeping pace with his own. He felt a sort of awe, as if he had beheld the wraith of himself; and ever, as he glanced suspiciously at the arranger, the stranger glanced at him. He was inexpressibly relieved when the figure turned down another street and vanished.

And Randal, who hadn't paid attention to any of the other passengers along the way, instinctively noticed this one. His nerves tingled at the silent movement of that figure as it moved from lamp to lamp, matching his pace. He felt a mix of awe, as if he were seeing a ghostly version of himself; and each time he looked suspiciously at the stranger, the stranger looked back at him. He felt an overwhelming sense of relief when the figure turned down another street and disappeared.

That man was a felon, as yet undetected. Between him and his kind there stood but a thought—a vail air-spun, but impassable, as the vail of the Image at Sais.

That man was a criminal, still unnoticed. Between him and his kind stood only a thought—a thin veil, spun from air, but unbreakable, like the veil of the Image at Sais.

And thus moved and thus looked Randal Leslie, a thing of dark and secret mischief—within the pale of the law, but equally removed from man by the vague consciousness that at his heart lay that which the eyes of man would abhor and loathe. Solitary amidst the vast city, and on through the machinery of Civilization, went the still spirit of Intellectual Evil.

And so Randal Leslie moved and looked, a figure of dark and secret mischief—within the bounds of the law, but just as disconnected from people due to the faint awareness that at his core lay something that would disgust and repulse others. Alone in the vast city, the quiet presence of Intellectual Evil navigated through the machinery of Civilization.


CHAPTER XI

Early the next morning Randal received two notes—one from Frank, written in great agitation, begging Randal to see and propitiate his father, whom he feared he had grievously offended; and then running off, rather incoherently, into protestations that his honor as well as his affections were engaged irrevocably to Beatrice, and that her, at least, he could never abandon.

Early the next morning, Randal got two notes—one from Frank, written in a state of panic, urgently asking Randal to talk to his father, whom he worried he had seriously upset; and then, rather hurriedly and somewhat chaotically, going on about how his honor and feelings were completely tied to Beatrice, and that he could never abandon her, at least.

And the second note was from the Squire himself—short, and far less cordial than usual—requesting Mr. Leslie to call on him.

And the second note was from the Squire himself—brief and much less friendly than usual—asking Mr. Leslie to visit him.

Randal dressed in haste, and went at once to Limmer's hotel.

Randal quickly got dressed and went straight to Limmer's hotel.

He found the Parson with Mr. Hazeldean, and endeavoring in vain to soothe him. The Squire had not slept all night, and his appearance was almost haggard.

He found the Parson with Mr. Hazeldean, trying in vain to calm him down. The Squire hadn't slept all night, and he looked almost worn out.

"Oho! Mr. young Leslie," said he, throwing himself back in his chair as Randal entered—"I thought you were a friend—I thought you were Frank's adviser. Explain, sir; explain."

"Oho! Young Mr. Leslie," he said, leaning back in his chair as Randal walked in—"I thought you were a friend—I thought you were Frank's advisor. Explain, sir; explain."

"Gently, my dear Mr. Hazeldean," said the Parson. "You do but surprise and alarm Mr. Leslie. Tell him more distinctly what he has to explain."

"Gently, my dear Mr. Hazeldean," said the Parson. "You're only surprising and alarming Mr. Leslie. Tell him more clearly what he needs to explain."

Squire.—"Did you or did you not tell me or Mrs. Hazeldean, that Frank was in love with Violante Rickeybockey?"

Gentleman.—"Did you or didn't you tell me or Mrs. Hazeldean that Frank was in love with Violante Rickeybockey?"

Randal (as in amaze).—"I! Never, sir! I feared, on the contrary, that he was somewhat enamored of a very different person. I hinted at that possibility. I could not do more, for I did not know how far Frank's affections were seriously engaged. And indeed, sir, Mrs. Hazeldean, though not encouraging the idea that your son could marry a foreigner and a Roman Catholic, did not appear to consider such objections insuperable, if Frank's happiness were really at stake."

Randal (as in amaze).—"Me? Never, sir! I actually feared that he was somewhat taken with a very different person. I suggested that possibility. I couldn’t do more, since I wasn't sure how serious Frank's feelings were. And honestly, sir, Mrs. Hazeldean, while not promoting the idea that your son could marry a foreigner and a Roman Catholic, didn’t seem to think those objections were impossible to overcome if Frank's happiness was truly at risk."

Here the poor Squire gave way to a burst of passion, that involved, in one tempest, Frank, Randal, Harry herself, and the whole race of foreigners, Roman Catholics, and women. While the Squire himself was still incapable of hearing reason, the Parson, taking aside Randal, convinced himself that the whole affair, so far as Randal was concerned, had its origin in a very natural mistake; and that while that young gentleman had been hinting at Beatrice, Mrs. Hazeldean had been thinking of Violante. With considerable difficulty he succeeded in conveying this explanation to the Squire, and somewhat appeasing his wrath against Randal. And the Dissimulator, seizing his occasion, then expressed so much grief and astonishment at learning that matters had gone as far as the Parson informed him—that Frank had actually proposed to Beatrice, been accepted, and engaged himself, before even communicating with his father; he declared so earnestly, that he could never conjure such evil—that he had had Frank's positive promise to take no step without the sanction of his parents; he professed such sympathy with the Squire's wounded feelings, and such regret at Frank's involvement, that Mr. Hazeldean at last yielded up his honest heart to his consoler—and gripping Randal's hand, said, "Well, well, I wronged you—beg your pardon. What now is to be done?"

Here, the poor Squire lost his temper, dragging Frank, Randal, Harry herself, and the entire lot of foreigners, Roman Catholics, and women into his outrage. While the Squire was still too upset to listen to reason, the Parson pulled Randal aside and convinced himself that everything, from Randal's perspective, was based on a simple misunderstanding; while Randal had been subtly referring to Beatrice, Mrs. Hazeldean had been thinking about Violante. With some effort, he managed to explain this to the Squire and calm his anger towards Randal. Taking advantage of the situation, Randal then expressed his shock and sadness at hearing that things had escalated as the Parson mentioned—that Frank had actually proposed to Beatrice, had been accepted, and got engaged without even talking to his father first. Randal insisted so passionately that he could never have imagined such trouble and that he had Frank’s clear promise not to act without his parents’ approval. He showed so much empathy for the Squire's hurt feelings and regret over Frank's entanglement that Mr. Hazeldean finally softened and accepted Randal's consolation—and shaking Randal's hand, he said, "Well, well, I was wrong about you—sorry about that. What should we do now?"

"Why, you can not consent to this marriage—impossible," replied Randal; "and we must hope therefore to influence Frank, by his sense of duty."

"Come on, you can't agree to this marriage—it's impossible," Randal replied; "so we have to hope to sway Frank by appealing to his sense of duty."

"That's it," said the Squire; "for I'll not give way. Pretty pass things have come to, indeed! A widow too, I hear. Artful jade—thought, no doubt, to catch a Hazeldean of Hazeldean. My estates go to an outlandish Papistical set of mongrel brats! No, no, never!"

"That's it," said the Squire; "I'm not backing down. What a situation we’ve gotten into! A widow too, I hear. Clever woman—no doubt she thought she could snag a Hazeldean of Hazeldean. My estates are going to a bunch of foreign Catholic mixed-breed kids! No, no, absolutely not!"

"But," said the Parson, mildly, "perhaps we may be unjustly prejudiced against this lady. We should have consented to Violante—why not to her? She is of good family?"

"But," said the Parson gently, "maybe we are being unfairly biased against this lady. We should have agreed to Violante—so why not to her? She comes from a good family?"

"Certainly," said Randal.

"Of course," said Randal.

"And good character?"

"And good character?"

Randal shook his head, and sighed. The Squire caught him roughly by the arm—"Answer the Parson!" cried he, vehemently.

Randal shook his head and sighed. The Squire grabbed him roughly by the arm—"Answer the Parson!" he shouted passionately.

"Indeed, sir, I can not speak ill of the character of a woman, who may, too, be Frank's wife; and the world is ill-natured, and not to be believed. But you can judge for yourself, my dear Mr. Hazeldean. Ask your brother whether Madame di Negra is one whom he would advise his nephew to marry."

"Sure, I can't say anything bad about a woman who could also be Frank's wife; people can be pretty cruel and not to be trusted. But you can decide for yourself, my dear Mr. Hazeldean. Ask your brother if Madame di Negra is someone he would recommend his nephew marry."

"My brother!" exclaimed the Squire furiously. "Consult my distant brother on the affairs of my own son!"

"My brother!" the Squire shouted angrily. "Consult my estranged brother about my own son's matters!"

"He is a man of the world," put in Randal.

"He’s a worldly guy," Randal added.

"And of feeling and honor," said the Parson, "and, perhaps, through him, we may be enabled to enlighten Frank, and save him from what appears to be the snare of an artful woman."

"And of feelings and honor," said the Parson, "and, maybe, through him, we can help Frank and save him from what seems to be the trap of a cunning woman."

"Meanwhile," said Randal, "I will seek Frank, and do my best with him. Let me go now—I will return in an hour or so."

"Meanwhile," Randal said, "I'll look for Frank and try my best to help him. Let me go now—I’ll be back in about an hour."

"I will accompany you," said the Parson.

"I'll go with you," said the Parson.

"Nay, pardon me, but I think we two young men can talk more openly without a third person, even so wise and kind as you."

"Nah, excuse me, but I think the two of us young men can speak more freely without a third person, even someone as wise and kind as you."

"Let Randal go," growled the Squire. And Randal went.

"Let Randal go," the Squire growled. And Randal left.

He spent some time with Frank, and the reader will easily divine how that time was employed. As he left Frank's lodgings, he found himself suddenly seized by the Squire himself.

He spent some time with Frank, and it’s easy for the reader to guess how that time was spent. As he left Frank's place, he was suddenly grabbed by the Squire himself.

"I was too impatient to stay at home and listen to the Parson's prosing," said Mr. Hazeldean, nervously. "I have shaken Dale off. Tell me what has passed. Oh! don't fear—I'm a man, and can bear the worst."

"I was too impatient to stay home and listen to the Parson's rambling," Mr. Hazeldean said nervously. "I've gotten rid of Dale. Just tell me what happened. Oh! don't worry—I'm a man and can handle the worst."

Randal drew the Squire's arm within his, and led him into the adjacent park.

Randal took the Squire's arm and guided him into the nearby park.

"My dear sir," said he, sorrowfully, "this is very confidential what I am about to say. I must repeat it to you, because without such confidence, I see not how to advise you on the proper course to take. But if I betray Frank, it is for his good, and to his own father:—only do not tell him. He would never forgive me—it would for ever destroy my influence over him."

"My dear sir," he said sadly, "what I'm about to say is very confidential. I must share it with you because I can't advise you on the right steps to take without this trust. But if I have to expose Frank, it’s for his own good and for his father’s benefit—just please don’t tell him. He would never forgive me, and it would ruin my influence over him forever."

"Go on, go on," gasped the Squire; "speak out. I'll never tell the ungrateful boy that I learned his secrets from another."

"Go on, go on," the Squire gasped; "just say it. I won’t tell that ungrateful kid that I found out his secrets from someone else."

"Then," said Randal, "the secret of his entanglement with Madame di Negra is simply this—he found her in debt—nay, on the point of being arrested—"

"Then," Randal said, "the secret of his involvement with Madame di Negra is basically this—he found her in debt—no, about to be arrested—"

"Debt!—arrested! Jezabel!"

"Debt!—arrested! Jezebel!"

"And in paying the debt himself, and saving her from arrest, he conferred on her the obligation which no woman of honor could accept save from her affianced husband. Poor Frank!—if sadly taken in, still we must pity and forgive him!"

"And by paying the debt himself and saving her from getting arrested, he placed on her the obligation that no woman of dignity could accept except from her fiancé. Poor Frank!—if he was sadly deceived, we still have to pity and forgive him!"

Suddenly, to Randal's great surprise, the Squire's whole face brightened up.

Suddenly, to Randal's shock, the Squire's entire face lit up.

"I see, I see!" he exclaimed, slapping his thigh. "I have it—I have it. 'Tis an affair of money! I can buy her off. If she took money from him, the mercenary, painted baggage! why, then, she'll take it from me. I don't care what it costs—half my fortune—all! I'd be content never to see Hazeldean Hall again, if I could save my son, my own son, from disgrace and misery; for miserable he will be when he knows he has broken my heart and his mother's. And for a creature like that! My boy, a thousand hearty thanks to you. Where does the wretch live? I'll go to her at once." And as he spoke, the Squire actually pulled out his pocket-book and began turning over and counting the bank-notes in it.

"I get it, I get it!" he shouted, slapping his thigh. "I figured it out—I figured it out. It’s about money! I can buy her off. If she accepted money from him, that mercenary, painted hussy! Well, then, she'll take it from me too. I don't care what it costs—half my fortune—all of it! I'd be fine with never seeing Hazeldean Hall again if it means saving my son, my own son, from disgrace and misery; because he will be miserable when he realizes he has broken my heart and his mother’s. And for a person like that! My boy, a thousand heartfelt thanks to you. Where does that wretch live? I’ll go to her right away." And as he spoke, the Squire actually pulled out his wallet and started sorting through and counting the cash in it.

Randal at first tried to combat this bold resolution on the part of the Squire; but Mr. Hazeldean had seized on it with all the obstinacy of his straightforward English mind. He cut Randal's persuasive eloquence off in the midst.

Randal initially tried to challenge the Squire's bold decision, but Mr. Hazeldean clung to it with all the stubbornness of his straightforward English mindset. He interrupted Randal's persuasive speech in the middle.

"Don't waste your breath. I've settled it;[Pg 66] and if you don't tell me where she lives, 'tis easily found out, I suppose."

"Don't waste your breath. I've figured it out;[Pg 66] and if you don't tell me where she lives, I can just find out easily, I guess."

Randal mused a moment. "After all," thought he, "why not? He will be sure so to speak as to enlist her pride against himself, and to irritate Frank to the utmost. Let him go."

Randal thought for a moment. "After all," he considered, "why not? He'll definitely speak in a way that turns her pride against him and annoys Frank to no end. Let him go."

Accordingly, he gave the information required; and, insisting with great earnestness on the Squire's promise, not to mention to Madam di Negra his knowledge of Frank's pecuniary aid (for that would betray Randal as the informant); and satisfying himself as he best might with the Squire's prompt assurance, "that he knew how to settle matters, without saying why or wherefore, as long as he opened his purse wide enough," he accompanied Mr. Hazeldean back into the streets, and there left him—fixing an hour in the evening for an interview at Limmer's, and hinting that it would be best to have that interview without the presence of the Parson. "Excellent good man," said Randal, "but not with sufficient knowledge of the world for affairs of this kind, which you understand so well."

Accordingly, he provided the necessary information; and, insisting firmly on the Squire's promise not to tell Madam di Negra about his knowledge of Frank's financial help (since that would expose Randal as the source), and reassuring himself as best he could with the Squire's quick assurance, "that he knew how to handle things, without explaining why or how, as long as he opened his wallet wide enough," he walked Mr. Hazeldean back into the streets and then left him—setting a time in the evening for a meeting at Limmer's and suggesting that it would be better to have that meeting without the Parson present. "A truly good man," said Randal, "but not worldly enough for matters like this, which you understand so well."

"I should think so," quoth the Squire, who had quite recovered his good-humor. "And the Parson is as soft as buttermilk. We must be firm here—firm, sir." And the Squire struck the end of his stick on the pavement, nodded to Randal, and went on to Mayfair as sturdily and as confidently as if to purchase a prize cow at a cattle-show.

"I think so," said the Squire, who had completely regained his cheerful mood. "And the Parson is as soft as butter. We need to be strong here—strong, sir." The Squire tapped the end of his stick on the pavement, nodded to Randal, and walked off to Mayfair as confidently and determinedly as if he were going to buy a prize cow at a cattle show.


CHAPTER XII

"Bring the light nearer," said John Burley—"nearer still."

"Bring the light closer," said John Burley—"even closer."

Leonard obeyed, and placed the candle on a little table by the sick man's bedside.

Leonard complied and set the candle on a small table next to the sick man's bed.

Burley's mind was partially wandering; but there was method in his madness. Horace Walpole said that "his stomach would survive all the rest of him." That which in Burley survived the last was his quaint wild genius. He looked wistfully at the still flame of the candle. "It lives ever in the air!" said he.

Burley's mind was a bit scattered, but he had a purpose behind his chaos. Horace Walpole said that "his stomach would outlast everything else." What remained in Burley until the end was his quirky, untamed creativity. He gazed longingly at the steady flame of the candle. "It always exists in the air!" he said.

"What lives ever?"

"What lives forever?"

Burley's voice swelled—"Light!" He turned from Leonard, and again contemplated the little flame. "In the fixed star, in the Will-o'-the-wisp, in the great sun that illumes half a world, or the farthing rushlight by which the ragged student strains his eyes—still the same flower of the elements. Light in the universe, thought in the soul—ay—ay—Go on with the simile. My head swims. Extinguish the light! You can not; fool, it vanishes from your eye, but it is still in the space. Worlds must perish, suns shrivel up, matter and spirit both fall into nothingness, before the combinations whose union makes that little flame, which the breath of a babe can restore to darkness, shall lose the power to unite into light once more. Lose the power!—no, the necessity:—it is the one Must in creation. Ay, ay, very dark riddles grow clear now—now when I could not cast up an addition sum in the baker's bill! What wise man denied that[Pg 67] two and two made four? Do they not make four? I can't answer him. But I could answer a question that some wise men have contrived to make much knottier." He smiled softly, and turned his face for some minutes to the wall.

Burley's voice grew stronger—"Light!" He turned away from Leonard and looked at the small flame again. "In the fixed star, in the Will-o'-the-wisp, in the great sun that lights up half the world, or the tiny rushlight by which the ragged student strains his eyes—it's all the same essence of the elements. Light in the universe, thought in the soul—yes—yes—Keep going with the comparison. My head is spinning. Extinguish the light! You can’t; you fool, it might vanish from your sight, but it still exists in space. Worlds must perish, suns must fade away, matter and spirit both fall into nothingness, before the combinations that create that little flame, which a baby's breath can snuff out, lose the ability to unite into light again. Lose the ability!—no, the necessity:—it’s the one Must in creation. Yes, yes, very dark riddles become clear now—now when I couldn't even do the addition for the baker's bill! What wise man said that[Pg 67] two and two don't make four? Don't they make four? I can't answer him. But I could answer a question that some wise men have managed to make way more complicated." He smiled softly and turned his face to the wall for a few minutes.

This was the second night on which Leonard had watched by his bedside, and Burley's state had grown rapidly worse. He could not last many days, perhaps many hours. But he had evinced an emotion beyond mere delight at seeing Leonard again. He had since then been calmer, more himself. "I feared I might have ruined you by my bad example," he said, with a touch of humor that became pathos as he added, "That idea preyed on me."

This was the second night Leonard had stayed by his bedside, and Burley's condition had quickly deteriorated. He couldn't last many days, maybe just a few hours. But he showed an emotion deeper than just happiness at seeing Leonard again. Since then, he had been calmer, more like himself. "I was worried I might have messed you up with my bad example," he said, adding a bit of humor that turned into sadness as he added, "That thought weighed on me."

"No, no; you did me great good."

"No, no; you really helped me a lot."

"Say that—say it often," said Burley, earnestly; "it makes my heart feel so light."

"Say that—say it often," Burley said, sincerely; "it makes my heart feel so light."

He had listened to Leonard's story with deep interest, and was fond of talking to him of little Helen. He detected the secret at the young man's heart, and cheered the hopes that lay there, amidst fears and sorrows. Burley never talked seriously of his repentance; it was not in his nature to talk seriously of the things which he felt solemnly. But his high animal spirits were quenched with the animal power that fed them. Now, we go out of our sensual existence only when we are no longer enthralled by the Present, in which the senses have their realm. The sensual being vanishes when we are in the Past or the Future. The Present was gone from Burley; he could no more be its slave and its king.

He had listened to Leonard's story with great interest and enjoyed talking to him about little Helen. He sensed the secret in the young man's heart and nurtured the hopes that lay there, amidst fears and sorrows. Burley never spoke seriously about his regrets; it just wasn't his style to discuss the things he took seriously. But his energetic spirit was dampened by the powerful emotions that fueled it. We escape our physical existence only when we’re no longer captivated by the Present, where the senses reign. The physical self disappears when we are in the Past or the Future. The Present had slipped away from Burley; he could no longer be its slave or its king.

It was most touching to see how the inner character of this man unfolded itself, as the leaves of the outer character fell off and withered—a character no one would have guessed in him—an inherent refinement that was almost womanly; and he had all a woman's abnegation of self. He took the cares lavished on him so meekly. As the features of the old man return in the stillness of death to the aspect of youth—the lines effaced, the wrinkles gone—so, in seeing Burley now, you saw what he had been in his spring of promise. But he himself saw only what he had failed to be—powers squandered—life wasted. "I once beheld," he said, "a ship in a storm. It was a cloudy, fitful day, and I could see the ship with all its masts fighting hard for life and for death. Then came night, dark as pitch, and I could only guess that the ship fought on. Toward the dawn the stars grew visible, and once more I saw the ship—it was a wreck—it went down just as the stars shone forth."

It was really moving to see how this man's true character revealed itself as the facade of his outer personality withered away—something no one would have expected from him—an innate grace that was almost feminine; and he had all of a woman's selflessness. He accepted the attention he received so humbly. Just as the features of an old man return to the youthful appearance in death—the lines smoothed out, the wrinkles erased—when you looked at Burley now, you saw what he had been in his prime. But he only saw what he had failed to achieve—powers wasted—life squandered. "I once saw," he said, "a ship in a storm. It was a cloudy, unpredictable day, and I could see the ship with all its masts struggling for survival. Then night fell, dark as coal, and I could only imagine that the ship continued to fight. As dawn approached, the stars became visible, and I saw the ship again—it was a wreck—it sank just as the stars appeared."

When he had made that allusion to himself, he sate very still for some time, then he spread out his wasted hands, and gazed on them, and on his shrunken limbs. "Good," said he, laughing low; "these hands were too large and rude for handling the delicate webs of my own mechanism, and these strong limbs ran away with me. If I had been a sickly, puny fellow, perhaps my mind would have had fair play. There was too much of brute body here! Look at this hand now! you can see the light through it! Good, good!"

When he made that reference to himself, he sat still for a while, then he spread out his bony hands and looked at them, along with his thin limbs. "Good," he said, laughing quietly; "these hands were too big and clumsy to deal with the delicate workings of my own mind, and these strong limbs carried me away. If I had been weak and frail, maybe my mind would have thrived. There was too much heavy body here! Look at this hand now! You can see light through it! Good, good!"

Now, that evening, until he had retired to bed, Burley had been unusually cheerful, and had talked with much of his old eloquence, if with little of his old humor. Among other matters, he had spoken with considerable interest of some poems and other papers in manuscript which had been left in the house by a former lodger, and which, the reader may remember, that Mrs. Goodyer had urged him in vain to read, in his last visit to her cottage. But then he had her husband Jacob to chat with, and the spirit-bottle to finish, and the wild craving for excitement plucked his thoughts back to his London revels. Now poor Jacob was dead, and it was not brandy that the sick man drank from the widow's cruise. And London lay afar amidst its fogs, like a world resolved back into nebulæ. So to please his hostess, and distract his own solitary thoughts, he had condescended (just before Leonard found him out) to peruse the memorials of a life obscure to the world, and new to his own experience of coarse joys and woes. "I have been making a romance, to amuse myself, from their contents," said he. "They may be of use to you, brother author. I have told Mrs. Goodyer to place them in your room. Among those papers is a journal—a woman's journal; it moved me greatly. A man gets into another world, strange to him as the orb of Sirius, if he can transport himself into the centre of a woman's heart, and see the life there, so wholly unlike our own. Things of moment to us, to it so trivial; things trifling to us, to it so vast. There was this journal—in its dates reminding me of stormy events of my own existence, and grand doings in the world's. And those dates there, chronicling but the mysterious unrevealed record of some obscure loving heart! And in that chronicle, O, Sir Poet, there was as much genius, vigor of thought, vitality of being, poured and wasted, as ever kind friend will say was lavished on the rude outer world by big John Burley! Genius, genius; are we all alike, then, save when we leash ourselves to some matter-of-fact material, and float over the roaring seas on a wooden plank or a herring-tub?" And after he had uttered that cry of a secret anguish, John Burley had begun to show symptoms of growing fever and disturbed brain; and when they had got him into bed, he lay there muttering to himself, until toward midnight he had asked Leonard to bring the light nearer to him.

Now, that evening, until he went to bed, Burley had been unusually cheerful and talked with a lot of his old eloquence, though not much of his old humor. Among other things, he had shown considerable interest in some poems and other manuscripts that had been left in the house by a previous lodger, which, as you may remember, Mrs. Goodyer had tried in vain to get him to read during his last visit to her cottage. But back then, he had her husband Jacob to talk to, and the spirit bottle to finish, and the wild craving for excitement pulled his thoughts back to his London parties. Now poor Jacob was dead, and it wasn't brandy that the sick man drank from the widow's vessel. And London lay far away in its fog, like a world reduced to mist. So, to please his hostess and distract himself from his own solitude, he had decided (just before Leonard found him) to read the memorials of a life unknown to the world and new to his own experiences of rough joys and sorrows. "I've been creating a story to entertain myself from what I've found," he said. "They might be useful to you, fellow writer. I told Mrs. Goodyer to put them in your room. Among those papers is a journal—a woman's journal; it really moved me. A man enters a world as strange to him as the star Sirius if he can transport himself into the heart of a woman and see the life there, so entirely different from our own. Things that are significant to us seem trivial to her; things that seem trivial to us are immense to her. There was this journal—its dates reminded me of stormy times in my own life, and grand events in the world. And those dates chronicled only the mysterious, unseen record of some anonymous loving heart! And in that record, oh, Sir Poet, there was as much genius, thoughtfulness, and vitality poured out as any good friend might say was wasted on the harsh outer world by big John Burley! Genius, genius; are we all the same, then, except when we tie ourselves to some practical material and float over the roaring seas on a wooden plank or a herring barrel?" After he expressed that cry of hidden anguish, John Burley began to show signs of rising fever and a disturbed mind; and when they got him into bed, he lay there muttering to himself until around midnight when he asked Leonard to bring the light closer to him.

So now he again was quiet—with his face turned toward the wall; and Leonard stood by the bedside sorrowfully, and Mrs. Goodyer, who did not heed Burley's talk, and thought only of his physical state, was dipping cloths into iced water to apply to his forehead. But as she approached with these, and addressed him soothingly, Burley raised himself on his arm, and waved aside the bandages. "I do not need them," said he, in a collected voice. "I am better now. I and that pleasant light understand one another, and I believe all it tells me. Pooh, pooh, I do not rave." He looked so smilingly and so kindly into her face, that the poor[Pg 69] woman, who loved him as her own son, fairly burst into tears. He drew her toward him and kissed her forehead.

So now he was quiet again—his face turned toward the wall; and Leonard stood by the bedside sadly, while Mrs. Goodyer, who ignored Burley's talk and thought only of his physical condition, was dipping cloths into iced water to apply to his forehead. But as she came closer with them and spoke to him gently, Burley propped himself up on his arm and waved away the bandages. "I don’t need them," he said in a calm voice. "I’m better now. This nice light and I understand each other, and I believe everything it tells me. Nonsense, I’m not raving." He looked so kindly and warmly into her face that the poor[Pg 69] woman, who loved him like her own son, couldn’t help but burst into tears. He pulled her toward him and kissed her forehead.

"Peace, old fool," said he, fondly. "You shall tell anglers hereafter how John Burley came to fish for the one-eyed perch which he never caught: and how, when he gave it up at the last, his baits all gone, and the line broken among the weeds, you comforted the baffled man. There are many good fellows yet in the world who will like to know that poor Burley did not die on a dunghill. Kiss me! Come, boy, you too. Now, God bless you, I should like to sleep." His cheeks were wet with the tears of both his listeners, and there was a moisture in his own eyes, which, nevertheless, beamed bright through the moisture.

"Calm down, old fool," he said lovingly. "You’ll tell fishermen from now on about how John Burley tried to catch the one-eyed perch he never managed to catch: and how, when he finally gave up, with all his bait gone and his line tangled in the weeds, you comforted the frustrated man. There are still many good people in the world who will want to know that poor Burley didn’t end up on a garbage heap. Give me a kiss! Come on, kid, you too. Now, God bless you, I’d like to get some sleep." His cheeks were wet with the tears of both his listeners, and there was a glimmer in his own eyes that still shone brightly through the tears.

He laid himself down again, and the old woman would have withdrawn the light. He moved uneasily. "Not that," he murmured—"light to the last!" And putting forth his wan hand, he drew aside the curtain so that the light might fall full on his face. In a few minutes he was asleep, breathing calmly and regularly as an infant.

He lay down again, and the old woman was about to turn off the light. He stirred restlessly. "Not that," he whispered—"light until the end!" And reaching out his pale hand, he pulled back the curtain so that the light could shine directly on his face. In a few minutes, he was asleep, breathing peacefully and steadily like a baby.

The old woman wiped her eyes, and drew Leonard softly into the adjoining room, in which a bed had been made up for him. He had not left the house since he had entered it with Dr. Morgan. "You are young, sir," said she, with kindness, "and the young want sleep. Lie down a bit: I will call you when he wakes."

The old woman wiped her eyes and gently guided Leonard into the next room, where a bed had been set up for him. He hadn’t left the house since he arrived with Dr. Morgan. "You’re young, sir," she said kindly, "and young people need sleep. Lie down for a bit; I’ll call you when he wakes up."

"No, I could not sleep," said Leonard. "I will watch for you."

"No, I couldn't sleep," Leonard said. "I'll wait for you."

The old woman shook her head. "I must see the last of him, sir; but I know he will be angry when his eyes open on me, for he has grown very thoughtful of others."

The old woman shook her head. "I have to see him one last time, sir; but I know he will be upset when he sees me, because he has become very considerate of others."

"Ah, if he had but been as thoughtful of himself!" murmured Leonard; and he seated himself by the table, on which, as he leaned his elbow, he dislodged some papers placed there. They fell to the ground with a dumb, moaning, sighing sound.

"Ah, if only he had thought about himself!" murmured Leonard; and he sat down at the table, where, as he leaned his elbow, he accidentally knocked some papers off. They fell to the ground with a soft, moaning, sighing sound.

"What is that?" said he, starting.

"What’s that?" he exclaimed, startled.

The old woman picked up the manuscripts and smoothed them carefully.

The old woman picked up the manuscripts and smoothed them out carefully.

"Ah, sir, he bade me place these papers here. He thought they might keep you from fretting about him, in case you would sit up and wake. And he had a thought of me, too; for I have so pined to find out the poor young lady, who left them years ago. She was almost as dear to me as he is; dearer perhaps until now—when—when—I am about to lose him."

"Ah, sir, he asked me to put these papers here. He thought they might help ease your worry about him if you happen to wake up. He also cared about me; I've been so eager to find out what happened to the poor young lady who left them years ago. She meant almost as much to me as he does, maybe even more until now—when—when—I’m about to lose him."

Leonard turned from the papers, without a glance at their contents: they had no interest for him at such a moment.

Leonard turned away from the papers without looking at what they said; he found them uninteresting at that moment.

The hostess went on—

The host continued—

"Perhaps she is gone to heaven before him: she did not look like one long for this world. She left us so suddenly. Many things of hers besides these papers are still here; but I keep them aired and dusted, and strew lavender over them, in case she ever comes for them again.[Pg 70] You never heard tell of her, did you, sir?" she added, with great simplicity, and dropping a half courtsey.

"Maybe she went to heaven before him: she really didn’t seem like someone who was meant to stay here long. She left us so unexpectedly. Many of her things besides these papers are still around; but I make sure to keep them fresh and dusted, and I sprinkle lavender over them, just in case she ever comes back for them.[Pg 70] You’ve never heard of her, have you, sir?" she added, with great simplicity, giving a slight curtsy.

"Of her?—of whom?"

"About her?—about whom?"

"Did not Mr. John tell you her name—dear—dear?—Mrs. Bertram."

"Didn't Mr. John tell you her name—oh dear?—Mrs. Bertram."

Leonard started;—the very name so impressed upon his memory by Harley L'Estrange.

Leonard was taken aback; the very name was so strongly etched in his memory by Harley L'Estrange.

"Bertram!" he repeated. "Are you sure?"

"Bertram!" he said again. "Are you certain?"

"O yes, sir! And many years after she had left us, and we had heard no more of her, there came a packet addressed to her here, from over sea, sir. We took it in, and kept it, and John would break the seal, to know if it would tell us any thing about her; but it was all in a foreign language like—we could not read a word."

"Oh yes, sir! Many years after she left us and we hadn’t heard from her again, a package addressed to her arrived here from overseas, sir. We took it in and kept it, and John broke the seal to see if it would tell us anything about her, but it was all in a foreign language—we couldn’t read a word."

"Have you the packet? Pray, show it to me. It may be of the greatest value. To-morrow will do—I can not think of that just now. Poor Burley!"

"Do you have the packet? Please, show it to me. It might be really valuable. Tomorrow is fine—I can't think about that right now. Poor Burley!"

Leonard's manner indicated that he wished to talk no more, and to be alone. So Mrs. Goodyer left him, and stole back to Burley's room on tiptoe.

Leonard's demeanor showed that he wanted to end the conversation and be left alone. So Mrs. Goodyer quietly left him and tiptoed back to Burley's room.

The young man remained in deep reverie for some moments. "Light," he murmured. "How often "Light" is the last word of those round whom the shades are gathering!"[C] He moved, and straight on his view through the cottage lattice there streamed light, indeed—not the miserable ray lit by a human hand—but the still and holy effulgence of a moonlit heaven. It lay broad upon the humble floors—pierced across the threshold of the death-chamber, and halted clear amidst its shadows.

The young man stayed lost in thought for a while. "Light," he whispered. "How often 'Light' is the final word of those surrounded by shadows!"[C] He moved, and right before him, through the cottage window, there flooded in light—not the dim beam created by human hands—but the calm and sacred glow of a moonlit sky. It spread wide across the simple floors—cut through the doorway of the death room, and stood bright amidst the darkness.

Leonard stood motionless, his eye following the silvery silent splendor.

Leonard stood still, his gaze tracking the shimmering, quiet beauty.

"And," he said inly—"and does this large erring nature, marred by its genial faults—this soul which should have filled a land, as yon orb the room, with a light that linked earth to heaven—does it pass away into the dark, and leave not a ray behind? Nay, if the elements of light are ever in the space, and when the flame goes out, return to the vital air—so thought, once kindled, lives for ever around and about us, a part of our breathing atmosphere. Many a thinker, many a poet, may yet illume the world, from the thoughts which yon genius, that will have no name, gave forth—to wander through air, and recombine again in some new form of light."

"And," he thought to himself, "does this great, flawed nature, marked by its warm imperfections—this spirit that should have filled a land, like that orb fills this room, with a light that connects earth to heaven—does it just fade into darkness, leaving no trace behind? No, if the elements of light are always in the air, and when the flame goes out, they return to the life-giving atmosphere—then thought, once sparked, lives on around us, becoming part of our shared environment. Many thinkers, many poets, might still illuminate the world, inspired by the ideas that this unnamed genius shared—to drift through the air, and come together again in some new form of light."

Thus he went on in vague speculations, seeking, as youth enamored of fame seeks too fondly,[Pg 71] to prove that mind never works, however erratically, in vain—and to retain yet, as an influence upon earth, the soul about to soar far beyond the atmosphere where the elements that make fame abide. Not thus had the dying man interpreted the endurance of light and thought.

Thus he continued with vague thoughts, trying, like a young person obsessed with fame, to prove that the mind never works, no matter how unpredictably, in vain—and to still hold onto, as a presence on earth, the spirit that is ready to rise well beyond the atmosphere where the things that create fame exist. The dying man had not understood the persistence of light and thought this way.

Suddenly, in the midst of his reverie, a low cry broke on his ear. He shuddered as he heard, and hastened forebodingly into the adjoining room. The old woman was kneeling by the bedside, and chafing Burley's hand—eagerly looking into his face. A glance sufficed to Leonard. All was over. Burley had died in sleep—calmly, and without a groan.

Suddenly, in the middle of his daydream, a quiet cry caught his attention. He shivered at the sound and rushed, feeling uneasy, into the next room. The old woman was kneeling by the bed, rubbing Burley's hand, eagerly looking at his face. One look was enough for Leonard. It was all over. Burley had died in his sleep—peacefully, and without a sound.

The eyes were half open, with that look of inexpressible softness which death sometimes leaves; and still they were turned toward the light; and the light burned clear. Leonard closed tenderly the heavy lids; and, as he covered the face, the lips smiled a serene farewell.

The eyes were half open, with that look of indescribable softness that death sometimes leaves; and still they were facing the light; and the light shone brightly. Leonard gently closed the heavy eyelids; and as he covered the face, the lips smiled a peaceful goodbye.

(TO BE CONTINUED.)

(TO BE CONTINUED.)


THE LITTLE GRAY GOSSIP.

Soon after Cousin Con's marriage, we were invited to stay for a few weeks with the newly-married couple, during the festive winter season; so away we went with merry hearts, the clear frosty air and pleasant prospect before us invigorating our spirits, as we took our places inside the good old mail-coach, which passed through the town of P——, where Cousin Con resided, for there were no railways then. Never was there a kinder or more genial soul than Cousin Con; and David Danvers, the good-man, as she laughingly called him, was, if possible, kinder and more genial still. They were surrounded by substantial comforts, and delighted to see their friends in a sociable, easy way, and to make them snug and cozy, our arrival being the signal for a succession of such convivialities. Very mirthful and enjoyable were these evenings, for Con's presence always shed radiant sunshine, and David's honest broad face beamed upon her with affectionate pride. During the days of their courtship at our house, they had perhaps indulged in billing and cooing a little too freely when in company with others, for sober, middle-aged lovers like themselves; thereby lying open to animadversions from prim spinsters, who wondered that Miss Constance and Mr. Danvers made themselves so ridiculous.

Soon after Cousin Con got married, we were invited to stay with the newlyweds for a few weeks during the festive winter season; so off we went with cheerful hearts, the crisp, frosty air and good vibes ahead of us lifting our spirits as we settled into the old mail-coach, which passed through the town of P——, where Cousin Con lived, since there were no railways back then. There was never a kinder or friendlier person than Cousin Con, and David Danvers, the good man, as she jokingly referred to him, was even kinder and friendlier. They were surrounded by solid comforts and loved having their friends over in a relaxed and welcoming way, with our arrival kicking off a series of fun get-togethers. Those evenings were great, full of laughter, as Con's presence always brought bright warmth, and David's genuine, broad face lit up with pride for her. During their courtship at our house, they might have been a bit too affectionate in front of others, considering they were sober, middle-aged lovers; this left them open to criticism from prim single ladies, who wondered why Miss Constance and Mr. Danvers acted so silly.

But now all this nonsense had sobered down, and nothing could be detected beyond a sly glance, or a squeeze of the hand now and then; yet we often quizzed them about by-gones, and declared that engaged pairs were insufferable—we could always find them out among a hundred!

But now all this foolishness had calmed down, and nothing could be seen beyond a sly glance or a quick squeeze of the hand now and then; yet we often teased them about the past and claimed that engaged couples were unbearable—we could always spot them among a hundred!

"I'll bet you any thing you like," cried Cousin Con, with a good-humored laugh, "that among our guests coming this evening" (there was to be a tea-junketing), "you'll not be able to point out the engaged couple—for there will be only one such present—though plenty of lads and lasses that would like to be so happily situated! But the couple I allude too are real turtle-doves, and yet I defy you to find them out!"

"I'll bet you anything you want," said Cousin Con, laughing good-naturedly, "that among our guests coming this evening" (we’re having a tea party), "you won't be able to spot the engaged couple—there will only be one such pair here—though there will be plenty of guys and girls who would love to be in that happy position! But the couple I'm talking about are true lovebirds, and I challenge you to find them!"

"Done, Cousin Con!" we exclaimed; "and what shall we wager?"

"All set, Cousin Con!" we shouted; "so, what should we bet?"

"Gloves! gloves to be sure!" cried David. "Ladies always wager gloves; though I can tell you, my Con is on the safe side now;" and David rubbed his hands, delighted with the joke; and we already, in perspective, beheld our glove-box enriched with half-a-dozen pair of snowy French sevens!

"Gloves! Definitely gloves!" shouted David. "Ladies always bet gloves; but I can tell you, my Con is playing it safe now;" and David rubbed his hands, thrilled with the joke; and we could already imagine our glove box filled with half a dozen pairs of pristine French sevens!

Never had we felt more interested in watching the arrivals and movements of strangers, than on this evening, for our honor was concerned, to detect the lovers, and raise the vail. Papas and mammas, and masters and misses, came trooping in; old ladies, and middle-aged; old gentlemen, and middle-aged—until the number amounted to about thirty, and Cousin Con's drawing-rooms were comfortably filled. We closely scrutinized all the young folks, and so intently but covertly watched their proceedings, that we could have revealed several innocent flirtations, but nothing appeared that could lead us to the turtle-doves and their engagement. At length, we really had hopes, and ensconced ourselves in a corner, to observe the more cautiously a tall, beautiful girl, whose eyes incessantly turned toward the door of the apartment; while each time it opened to admit any one, she sighed and looked disappointed, as if that one was not the one she yearned to see. We were deep in a reverie, conjuring up a romance of which she was the heroine, when a little lady, habited in gray, whose age might average threescore, unceremoniously seated herself beside us, and immediately commenced a conversation, by asking if we were admiring pretty Annie Mortimer—following the direction of our looks. On receiving a reply in the affirmative, she continued: "Ah, she's a good, affectionate girl; a great favorite of mine is sweet Annie Mortimer."

We had never been more interested in watching the arrivals and movements of strangers than on this evening, as our honor was at stake to spot the lovers and lift the veil on their relationship. Parents, children, and adults came pouring in; older ladies and middle-aged ones; older gentlemen and those in their prime—until there were about thirty people, and Cousin Con's living rooms were pleasantly filled. We carefully examined all the young people, and watched their actions so intently yet discreetly that we could have uncovered several innocent flirtations, but nothing indicated the presence of the turtle-doves and their connection. Eventually, we grew hopeful and settled into a corner to observe more carefully a tall, beautiful girl whose eyes kept darting toward the door of the room. Each time it opened to let someone in, she sighed and seemed disappointed, as if that person wasn’t the one she was longing to see. We were lost in daydreams, imagining a romantic story of which she was the heroine, when a little lady dressed in gray, who appeared to be around sixty, unceremoniously sat down next to us and immediately started a conversation. She asked if we were admiring pretty Annie Mortimer—following the direction of our gaze. Upon hearing us say yes, she continued, “Ah, she's a sweet, kind girl; I really like dear Annie Mortimer.”

"Watching for her lover, no doubt?" we ventured to say, hoping to gain the desired information, and thinking of our white kid-gloves. "She is an engaged young lady?"

"Waiting for her boyfriend, I suppose?" we guessed, trying to get the information we wanted while thinking about our white kid gloves. "Is she a taken young lady?"

"Engaged! engaged!" cried the little animated lady: "no indeed. The fates forbid! Annie Mortimer is not engaged." The expression of the little lady's countenance at our bare supposition of so natural a fact, amounted almost to the ludicrous; and we with some difficulty articulated a serious rejoinder, disavowing all previous knowledge, and therefore erring through ignorance. We had now time to examine our new acquaintance more critically. As we have already stated, she was habited in gray; but not only was her attire gray, but she was literally gray all over: gray hairs, braided in a peculiar obsolete fashion, and quite uncovered; gray gloves; gray shoes; and, above all, gray eyes, soft, large, and peculiarly sad in expression, yet beautiful eyes, redeeming the gray, monotonous countenance from absolute plainness. Mary Queen of Scots, we are told, had gray eyes; and even she, poor lady, owned not more speaking or history-telling orbs than did[Pg 73] this little unknown gossip in gray. But our attention was diverted from the contemplation, by the entrance of another actor on the stage, to whom Annie Mortimer darted forward with an exclamation of delight and welcome. The new comer was a slender, elderly gentleman, whose white hairs, pale face, and benignant expression presented nothing remarkable in their aspect, beyond a certain air of elegance and refinement, which characterized the whole outward man.

"Engaged! Engaged!" cried the little animated lady. "Oh no, the fates forbid! Annie Mortimer is not engaged." The look on the little lady's face at our simple assumption of such a natural truth was almost ridiculous, and we struggled to respond seriously, claiming no prior knowledge and thus being mistaken out of ignorance. We now had the chance to examine our new acquaintance more closely. As we mentioned before, she was dressed in gray; but not just her outfit was gray—she was literally gray all over: gray hair, styled in an old-fashioned braid and completely uncovered; gray gloves; gray shoes; and most importantly, gray eyes—soft, large, and particularly sad in expression, yet beautiful eyes that saved her gray, monotonous face from being completely plain. Mary Queen of Scots, we are told, had gray eyes; and even she, poor lady, didn’t have more expressive or story-telling eyes than this little unknown gossip in gray. But our thoughts were interrupted by the arrival of another person, to whom Annie Mortimer rushed forward with an exclamation of joy and greeting. The newcomer was a slender, elderly gentleman, whose white hair, pale face, and gentle expression were nothing remarkable in appearance, except for a certain air of elegance and refinement that characterized his whole demeanor.

"That is a charming-looking old gentleman," said we to the gray lady; "is he Annie's father?"

"That’s a charming-looking old man," we said to the gray lady; "is he Annie's father?"

"Her father! Oh dear, no! That gentleman is a bachelor; but he is Annie's guardian, and has supplied the place of a father to her, for poor Annie is an orphan."

"Her father! Oh no! That man is a bachelor; but he is Annie's guardian, and has taken the role of a father for her, since poor Annie is an orphan."

"Oh!" we exclaimed, and there was a great deal of meaning in our oh! for had we not read and heard of youthful wards falling in love with their guardians? and might not the fair Annie's taste incline this way? The little gray lady understood our thoughts, for she smiled, but said nothing; and while we were absorbed with Annie and her supposed antiquated lover, she glided into the circle, and presently we beheld Annie's guardian, with Annie leaning on his arm, exchange a few words with her in an under tone, as she passed them to an inner room.

"Oh!" we exclaimed, and there was a lot of meaning in our "oh!" because hadn't we read and heard about young wards falling in love with their guardians? And could it be that the beautiful Annie had similar tastes? The little gray lady caught our thoughts, for she smiled but said nothing; and while we were caught up with Annie and her supposed old-fashioned lover, she joined the group, and soon we saw Annie's guardian, with Annie leaning on his arm, whisper a few words to her as she passed them into an inner room.

"Who is that pleasing-looking old gentleman?" said we to our hostess; "and what is the name of the lady in gray, who went away just as you came up? That is Annie Mortimer we know, and we know also that she isn't engaged!"

"Who is that nice-looking older man?" we asked our hostess. "And what’s the name of the lady in gray who left just as you arrived? We know that’s Annie Mortimer, and we also know she isn’t engaged!"

Cousin Con laughed heartily as she replied: "That nice old gentleman is Mr. Worthington, our poor curate; and a poor curate he is likely ever to continue, so far as we can see. The lady in gray we call our 'little gray gossip,' and a darling she is! As to Annie, you seem to know all about her. I suppose little Bessie has been lauding her up to the skies."

Cousin Con laughed cheerfully as she replied: "That nice old man is Mr. Worthington, our unfortunate curate, and it looks like he’ll always be one, as far as we can tell. The lady in gray we call our 'little gray gossip,' and she’s a sweetheart! As for Annie, you seem to know all about her. I guess little Bessie has been singing her praises."

"Who is little Bessie?" we inquired.

"Who is little Bessie?" we asked.

"Little Bessie is your little gray gossip: we never call her any thing but Bessie to her face; she is a harmless little old maid. But come this way: Bessie is going to sing, for they won't let her rest till she complies; and Bessie singing, and Bessie talking, are widely different creatures."

"Little Bessie is your little gray gossip: we only call her Bessie to her face; she’s a harmless little old maid. But come this way: Bessie is going to sing, because they won’t let her rest until she does; and Bessie singing and Bessie talking are two totally different people."

Widely different indeed! Could this be the little gray lady seated at the piano, and making it speak? while her thrilling tones, as she sang of 'days gone by,' went straight to each listener's heart, she herself looking ten years younger! When the song was over, I observed Mr. Worthington, with Annie still resting on his arm, in a corner of the apartment, shaded by a projecting piece of furniture; and I also noted the tear on his furrowed cheek, which he hastily brushed away, and stooped to answer some remark of Annie's, who, with fond affection, had evidently observed it too, endeavoring to dispel the painful illusion which remembrances of days gone by occasioned.

Widely different indeed! Could this be the little gray lady sitting at the piano and making it come alive? While her thrilling voice, as she sang about 'days gone by,' touched each listener's heart, she looked ten years younger! When the song ended, I noticed Mr. Worthington, with Annie still resting on his arm, in a corner of the room, shaded by a piece of furniture; and I also saw the tear on his lined cheek, which he quickly wiped away, leaning down to respond to something Annie had said, who, with loving concern, had clearly noticed it too, trying to lift the painful reminder that memories of the past brought.

We at length found the company separating,[Pg 74] and our wager still unredeemed. The last to depart was Mr. Worthington, escorting Annie Mortimer and little Bessie, whom he shawled most tenderly, no doubt because she was a poor forlorn little old maid, and sang so sweetly.

We eventually saw the group breaking up,[Pg 74] and our bet still unsettled. The last to leave was Mr. Worthington, accompanying Annie Mortimer and little Bessie, whom he wrapped up warmly, probably because she was an unfortunate, lonely little old maid and sang so beautifully.

The next morning at breakfast, Cousin Con attacked us, supported by Mr. Danvers, both demanding a solution of the mystery, or the scented sevens! After a vast deal of laughing, talking, and discussion, we were obliged to confess ourselves beaten, for there had been an engaged couple present on the previous evening, and we had failed to discover them. No; it was not Annie Mortimer; she had no lover. No; it was not the Misses Halliday, or the Masters Burton: they had flirted and danced, and danced and flirted indiscriminately; but as to serious engagements—pooh! pooh!

The next morning at breakfast, Cousin Con and Mr. Danvers cornered us, both insisting we solve the mystery or face the consequences! After a lot of laughing, talking, and debating, we had to admit defeat, as there had been an engaged couple with us the night before, and we hadn’t figured out who they were. No, it wasn’t Annie Mortimer; she didn’t have a boyfriend. No, it wasn’t the Halliday sisters or the Burton brothers; they had flirted and danced around, but as for serious relationships—no way!

Who would have conjectured the romance of reality that was now divulged? and how could we have been so stupid as not to have read it at a glance? These contradictory exclamations, as is usual in such cases, ensued when the riddle was unfolded. It is so easy to be wise when we have learned the wisdom. Yet we cheerfully lost our wager, and would have lost a hundred such, for the sake of hearing a tale so far removed from matter-of-fact; proving also that enduring faith and affection are not so fabulous as philosophers often pronounce them to be.

Who would have guessed the reality of the romance that was just revealed? And how could we have been so foolish not to see it right away? These conflicting exclamations, as is common in such situations, came up when the mystery was solved. It’s so easy to be smart after we’ve figured things out. Still, we happily lost our bet and would have gladly lost a hundred more just to hear a story so unlike everyday life; it also shows that lasting faith and love aren’t as mythical as philosophers often claim they are.

Bessie Prudholm was nearly related to David Danvers, and she had been the only child of a talented but improvident father, who, after a short, brilliant career, as a public singer, suddenly sank into obscurity and neglect, from the total loss of his vocal powers, brought on by a violent rheumatic cold and lasting prostration of strength. At this juncture, Bessie had nearly attained her twentieth year, and was still in mourning for an excellent mother, by whom she had been tenderly and carefully brought up. From luxury and indulgence the descent to poverty and privation was swift. Bessie, indeed, inherited a very small income in right of her deceased parent, sufficient for her own wants, and even comforts, but totally inadequate to meet the thousand demands, caprices, and fancies of her ailing and exigent father. However, for five years she battled bravely with adversity, eking out their scanty means by her exertions—though, from her father's helpless condition, and the constant and unremitting attention he required, she was in a great measure debarred from applying her efforts advantageously. The poor, dying man, in his days of health, had contributed to the enjoyment of the affluent, and in turn been courted by them; but now, forgotten and despised, he bitterly reviled the heartless world, whose hollow meed of applause it had formerly been the sole aim of his existence to secure. Wealth became to his disordered imagination the desideratum of existence, and he attached inordinate value to it, in proportion as he felt the bitter stings of comparative penury. To guard his only child—whom he certainly loved better than any thing else in the world,[Pg 75] save himself—from this dreaded evil, the misguided man, during his latter days, extracted from her an inviolable assurance, never to become the wife of any individual who could not settle upon her, subject to no contingencies or chances, the sum of at least one thousand pounds.

Bessie Prudholm was closely related to David Danvers, and she was the only child of a talented but careless father. After a brief, impressive career as a public singer, he suddenly fell into obscurity and neglect due to losing his singing ability from a severe rheumatic cold and prolonged weakness. At this point, Bessie was nearly twenty years old and still in mourning for her wonderful mother, who had raised her with love and care. The shift from luxury and indulgence to poverty and hardship was rapid. Bessie inherited a small income from her deceased parent, enough for her own needs and some comfort, but totally insufficient to cover the countless demands and whims of her sick and demanding father. Nevertheless, she fought bravely against their struggles for five years, stretching their limited resources through her efforts. However, due to her father's helpless condition and the constant attention he required, she was largely unable to apply her efforts effectively. The poor, dying man, in his healthier days, had contributed to the enjoyment of the wealthy and had been sought after by them; but now, forgotten and scorned, he bitterly cursed the heartless world that had once been the focus of his existence. Wealth became, in his troubled mind, the ultimate goal of life, and he placed undue importance on it as he felt the painful stings of relative poverty. To protect his only child—whom he undoubtedly loved more than anything else in the world, except himself—from this feared misfortune, the misguided man, in his final days, forced her to promise that she would never marry anyone who could not guarantee her a sum of at least one thousand pounds without any conditions or uncertainties.

Bessie, who was fancy-free, and a lively-spirited girl, by no means relished the slights and privations which poverty entails. She therefore willingly became bound by this solemn promise; and when her father breathed his last, declaring that she had made his mind comparatively easy, little Bessie half smiled, even in the midst of her deep and natural sorrow, to think how small and easy a concession her poor father had exacted, when her own opinions and views so perfectly coincided with his. The orphan girl took up her abode with the mother of David Danvers, and continued to reside with that worthy lady until the latter's decease. It was beneath the roof of Mrs. Danvers that Bessie first became acquainted with Mr. Worthington—that acquaintance speedily ripening into a mutual and sincere attachment. He was poor and patronless then, as he had continued ever since, with slender likelihood of ever possessing £100 of his own, much less £1000 to settle on a wife. It is true, that in the chances and changes of this mortal life, Paul Worthington might succeed to a fine inheritance; but there were many lives betwixt him and it, and Paul was not the one to desire happiness at another's expense, nor was sweet little Bessie either.

Bessie, who was carefree and full of life, didn’t enjoy the slights and hardships that come with poverty. So, she willingly accepted this solemn promise; and when her father passed away, saying that she had eased his mind, little Bessie couldn't help but smile a bit, even through her deep and natural sadness, thinking about how small and easy a request her poor father had made, considering how closely her own views aligned with his. The orphan girl moved in with David Danvers's mother and lived with that kind lady until her death. It was under Mrs. Danvers's roof that Bessie first met Mr. Worthington, and that acquaintance quickly turned into a genuine and mutual bond. He was poor and without connections back then, just as he had been ever since, with little chance of ever having £100 to his name, let alone £1000 to offer a wife. It’s true that in the ups and downs of life, Paul Worthington might inherit a nice fortune; but there were many lives standing between him and that, and neither Paul nor sweet little Bessie wanted happiness at someone else's cost.

Yet was Paul Worthington rich in one inestimable possession, such as money can not purchase—even in the love of a pure devoted heart, which for him, and for his dear sake, bravely endured the life-long loneliness and isolation which their peculiar circumstances induced. Paul did not see Bessie grow old and gray: in his eyes, she never changed; she was to him still beautiful, graceful, and enchanting; she was his betrothed, and he came forth into the world, from his books, and his arduous clerical and parochial duties, to gaze at intervals into her soft eyes, to press her tiny hand, to whisper a fond word, and then to return to his lonely home, like a second Josiah Cargill, to try and find in severe study oblivion of sorrow.

Yet Paul Worthington was rich in something priceless that money can't buy—even the love of a pure, devoted heart, which for him, and for his dear sake, bravely endured the lifelong loneliness and isolation their unique situation brought about. Paul didn't see Bessie grow old and gray; in his eyes, she never changed. She was still beautiful, graceful, and enchanting to him; she was his fiancée. He stepped out into the world from his books and his demanding clerical and parochial duties to occasionally gaze into her soft eyes, press her tiny hand, whisper a loving word, and then return to his lonely home, like a second Josiah Cargill, trying to find escape from sorrow in intense study.

Annie Mortimer had been sent to him as a ministering angel: she was the orphan and penniless daughter of Mr. Worthington's dearest friend and former college-chum, and she had come to find a shelter beneath the humble roof of the pious guardian, to whose earthly care she had been solemnly bequeathed. Paul's curacy was not many miles distant from the town where Bessie had fixed her resting-place; and it was generally surmised by the select few who were in the secret of little Bessie's history, that she regarded Annie Mortimer with especial favor and affection, from the fact that Annie enjoyed the privilege of solacing and cheering Paul Worthington's declining years. Each spoke of her as a dear adopted daughter, and Annie equally returned the affection of both.

Annie Mortimer had been sent to him as a caring angel: she was the orphaned and broke daughter of Mr. Worthington's closest friend and former college buddy, and she had come to find shelter under the modest roof of the devoted guardian to whom she had been solemnly entrusted. Paul's curacy wasn’t far from the town where Bessie had settled down; and it was generally believed by the select few who knew little Bessie’s story that she had a special fondness for Annie Mortimer, since Annie had the privilege of comforting and brightening Paul Worthington’s later years. They both referred to her as a beloved adopted daughter, and Annie equally reciprocated their affection.

Poor solitaries! what long anxious years they had known, separated by circumstance, yet knit together in the bonds of enduring love!

Poor lonely souls! What long, anxious years they had experienced, separated by circumstances, yet connected by the ties of lasting love!

I pictured them at festive winter seasons, at their humble solitary boards; and in summer prime, when song-birds and bright perfumed flowers call lovers forth into the sunshine rejoicingly. They had not dared to rejoice during their long engagement; yet Bessie was a sociable creature, and did not mope or shut herself up, but led a life of active usefulness, and was a general favorite amongst all classes. They had never contemplated the possibility of evading Bessie's solemn promise to her dying father; to their tender consciences, that fatal promise was as binding and stringent, as if the gulf of marriage or conventual vows yawned betwixt them. We had been inclined to indulge some mirth at the expense of the little gray gossip, when she first presented herself to our notice; but now we regarded her as an object of interest, surrounded by a halo of romance, fully shared in by her charming, venerable lover. And this was good Cousin Con's elucidation of the riddle, which she narrated with many digressions, and with animated smiles, to conceal tears of sympathy. Paul Worthington and little Bessy did not like their history to be discussed by the rising frivolous generation; it was so unworldly, so sacred, and they looked forward with humble hope so soon to be united for ever in the better land, that it pained and distressed them to be made a topic of conversation.

I imagined them during cheerful winter holidays, at their modest individual tables; and in the prime of summer, when songbirds and fragrant flowers entice lovers to bask in the sun happily. They hadn’t allowed themselves to celebrate during their long engagement; yet Bessie was a social person who didn’t sulk or isolate herself, but led a life of active service and was a favorite among all social groups. They had never considered the possibility of bypassing Bessie’s serious promise to her dying father; for their sensitive consciences, that promise felt as binding and strict as if the chasm of marriage or religious vows stood between them. We had been tempted to poke fun at the little gray woman when she first came to our attention; but now we saw her as someone interesting, surrounded by a romantic aura, fully shared by her lovely, older partner. And this was good Cousin Con's explanation of the mystery, which she shared with many digressions and lively smiles, trying to hide tears of compassion. Paul Worthington and little Bessy didn’t want their story to be discussed by the up-and-coming shallow generation; it was so unworldly, so sacred, and they looked forward with humble hope to soon be united forever in the better place, that it upset and troubled them to be a topic of conversation.

Were we relating fiction, it would be easy to bring this antiquated pair together, even at the eleventh hour; love and constancy making up for the absence of one sweet ingredient, evanescent, yet beautiful—the ingredient, we mean, of youth. But as this is a romance of reality, we are fain to divulge facts as they actually occurred, and as we heard them from authentic sources. Paul and Bessie, divided in their lives, repose side by side in the old church-yard. He dropped off first, and Bessie doffed her gray for sombre habiliments of darker hue. Nor did she long remain behind, loving little soul! leaving her property to Annie Mortimer, and warning her against long engagements.

If we were telling a story, it would be easy to bring this outdated couple together at the last minute; love and loyalty making up for the lack of one sweet element, fleeting yet lovely—the element we mean is youth. But since this is a story of reality, we have to share the facts as they really happened, as we heard them from reliable sources. Paul and Bessie, separated in life, rest next to each other in the old graveyard. He passed away first, and Bessie traded her gray for darker clothes. She didn’t stay behind for long, that loving soul! She left her belongings to Annie Mortimer and advised her against long engagements.

The last time we heard of Annie, she was the happy wife of an excellent man, who, fully coinciding in the opinion of the little gray gossip, protested strenuously against more than six weeks' courtship, and carried his point triumphantly.

The last time we heard about Annie, she was the happy wife of a great man who, completely agreeing with what the little gray gossip said, strongly objected to more than six weeks of dating and won the argument decisively.


THE MOURNER AND THE COMFORTER.

It was a lovely day in the month of August, and the sun, which had shone with undiminished splendor from the moment of dawn, was now slowly declining, with that rich and prolonged glow with which it seems especially to linger around those scenes where it seldomest finds admittance. For it was a valley in the north of Scotland into which its light was streaming, and many a craggy top and rugged side, rarely seen without their cap of clouds or shroud of mist,[Pg 77] were now throwing their mellow-tinted forms, clear and soft, into a lake of unusual stillness. High above the lake, and commanding a full view of that and of the surrounding hills, stood one of those countryfied hotels not unfrequently met with on a tourist's route, formerly only designed for the lonely traveler or weary huntsman, but which now, with the view to accommodate the swarm of visitors which every summer increased, had gone on stretching its cords and enlarging its boundaries, till the original tenement looked merely like the seed from which the rest had sprung. Nor, even under these circumstances, did the house admit of much of the luxury of privacy; for, though the dormitories lay thick and close along the narrow corridor, all accommodation for the day was limited to two large and long rooms, one above the other, which fronted the lake. Of these, the lower one was given up to pedestrian travelers—the sturdy, sunburnt shooters of the moors, who arrive with weary limbs and voracious appetites, and question no accommodation which gives them food and shelter; while the upper one was the resort of ladies and family parties, and was furnished with a low balcony, now covered with a rough awning.

It was a beautiful day in August, and the sun, which had been shining brightly since dawn, was now slowly setting, casting that warm and lingering glow that seems to linger most around places where it rarely shines. It was a valley in northern Scotland that was receiving its light, and numerous rocky peaks and rugged slopes, often hidden under clouds or mist, were now reflecting their soft, warm shapes into an unusually calm lake. High above the lake, offering a full view of it and the surrounding hills, stood one of those countryside hotels often found along tourist routes, originally meant for solitary travelers or tired hunters, but which had now expanded to accommodate the increasing number of visitors every summer. The original structure now looked like just the seed from which the rest had grown. Even so, the hotel didn’t offer much in the way of private luxury; although the guest rooms were packed tightly along a narrow hallway, daytime accommodations were limited to two large rooms, one on top of the other, facing the lake. The lower room was reserved for hikers—the sturdy, sunburned hunters of the moors—who arrive with tired legs and big appetites, asking for nothing but food and shelter; while the upper room was popular with ladies and families and featured a low balcony, now covered with a rough awning.

Both these rooms, on the day we mention, were filled with numerous guests. Touring was at its height, and shooting had begun; and, while a party of way-worn young men, coarsely clad and thickly shod, were lying on the benches, or lolling out of the windows of the lower apartment, a number of traveling parties were clustered in distinct groups in the room above; some lingering round their tea-tables, while others sat on the balcony, and seemed attentively watching the evolutions of a small boat, the sole object on the lake before them. It is pleasant to watch the actions, however insignificant they may be, of a distant group; to see the hand obey without hearing the voice that has bidden; to guess at their inward motives by their outward movements; to make theories of their intentions, and try to follow them out in their actions; and, as at a pantomime, to tell the drift of the piece by dumb show alone. And it is an idle practice, too, and one especially made for the weary or the listless traveler, giving them amusement without thought, and occupation without trouble; for people who have had their powers of attention fatigued by incessant exertion, or weakened by constant novelty, are glad to settle it upon the merest trifle at last. So the loungers on the balcony increased, and the little boat became a centre of general interest to those who apparently had not had one sympathy in common before. So calm and gliding was its motion, so refreshing the gentle air which played round it, that many an eye from the shore envied the party who were seated in it. These consisted of three individuals, two large figures and a little one.

Both of these rooms, on the day we’re talking about, were filled with a lot of guests. It was peak tourist season, and hunting had started; while a group of tired young men, dressed in rough clothes and sturdy shoes, were lying on benches or hanging out of the windows of the lower room, several traveling groups were gathered in distinct clusters in the room above. Some were lingering around their tea tables, while others sat on the balcony, seemingly focused on watching a small boat, the only object on the lake in front of them. It’s enjoyable to observe the actions of a distant group, no matter how trivial; to see their hands moving without hearing the voice that directed them; to guess their inner motives based on their outward movements; to create theories about their intentions and try to decode them through their actions; and, like watching a silent play, to interpret the storyline solely through their gestures. It’s a pointless activity, especially suited for tired or uninterested travelers, providing them with entertainment without requiring much thought, and engagement without any effort. People who have worn out their attention with constant effort, or have been drained by continuous new experiences, are often happy to finally settle on the smallest distraction. Thus, the loungers on the balcony grew in number, and the little boat became a focal point of interest for those who seemingly had nothing in common before. Its smooth, gliding motion and the refreshing gentle breeze around it made many people on the shore envy the group sitting in it. This group consisted of three people: two large figures and a small one.

"It is Captain H—— and his little boy," said one voice, breaking silence; "they arrived here yesterday."

"It’s Captain H—— and his little boy," said one voice, breaking the silence; "they got here yesterday."

"They'll be going to see the great waterfall," said another.

"They're going to see the amazing waterfall," said another.

"They have best make haste about it; for they have a mile to walk up-hill when they land," said a third.

"They should hurry; they have a mile to walk uphill when they get off," said a third.

"Rather they than I," rejoined a languid fourth; and again there was a pause. Meanwhile the boat party seemed to be thinking little about the waterfall, or the need for expedition. For a few minutes the quick-glancing play of the oars was seen, and then they ceased again; and now an arm was stretched out toward some distant object in the landscape, as if asking a question; and then the little fellow pointed here and there, as if asking many questions at once, and, in short, the conjectures on the balcony were all thrown out. But now the oars had rested longer than usual, and a figure rose and stooped, and seemed occupied with something at the bottom of the boat. What were they about? They were surely not going to fish at this time of evening? No, they were not; for slowly a mast was raised, and a sail unfurled, which at first hung flapping, as if uncertain which side the wind would take it, and then gently swelled out to its full dimensions, and seemed too large a wing for so tiny a body. A slight air had arisen; the long reflected lines of colors, which every object on the shore dripped, as it were, into the lake, were gently stirred with a quivering motion; every soft strip of liquid tint broke gradually into a jagged and serrated edge; colors were mingled, forms were confused; the mountains, which lay in undiminished brightness above, seemed by some invisible agency to be losing their second selves from beneath them; long, cold white lines rose apparently from below, and spread radiating over all the liquid picture: in a few minutes, the lake lay one vast sheet of bright silver, and half the landscape was gone. The boat was no longer in the same element: before, it had floated in a soft, transparent ether; now, it glided upon a plain of ice.

"Rather them than me," a relaxed fourth person replied, and once again there was a pause. Meanwhile, the boat crew seemed to be less concerned about the waterfall or the need to hurry. For a few minutes, the quick movements of the oars were visible, and then they stopped again; now an arm reached out toward some distant object in the landscape, as if asking a question. Then the little guy pointed here and there, as if asking many questions at once, and, in short, all the guesses from the balcony were out in the open. But now the oars had rested longer than usual, and one figure rose up and bent down, appearing to be busy with something at the bottom of the boat. What were they doing? They couldn't possibly be fishing at this time of evening, could they? No, they weren’t; slowly, a mast was raised, and a sail was unfurled, which at first hung there flapping, as if unsure which way the wind would blow it, and then gently filled out to its full size, seeming too big for such a small boat. A light breeze had picked up; the long lines of colors reflected from every object on the shore dripped, as if into the lake, and were gently disturbed with a quivering motion; every soft strip of liquid color gradually turned into a jagged edge; colors mingled, and shapes blurred; the mountains, which remained bright above, seemed to lose their reflections beneath them due to some invisible force. Long, cold white lines appeared to rise from below and spread out over the entire liquid scene: in a few minutes, the lake lay like a vast sheet of bright silver, and half the landscape had vanished. The boat was no longer in the same atmosphere: before, it had floated in a soft, transparent ether; now, it glided over a surface of ice.

"I wish they had stuck to their oars," said the full, deep voice of an elderly gentleman; "hoisting a sail on these lakes is very much like trusting to luck in life—it may go on all right for a while, and save you much trouble, but you are never sure that it won't give you the slip, and that when you are least prepared."

"I wish they had kept rowing," said the rich, deep voice of an older man; "putting up a sail on these lakes is a lot like relying on luck in life—it might work out fine for a bit and save you a lot of hassle, but you can never be sure it won’t let you down when you’re least ready."

"No danger in the world, sir," said a young fop standing by, who knew as little about boating on Scotch lakes as he did of most things any where else. Meanwhile, the air had become chill, the sun had sunk behind the hills, and the boating party, tired, apparently, of their monotonous amusement, turned the boat's head toward shore. For some minutes they advanced with fuller and fuller bulging sail in the direction they sought, when suddenly the breeze seemed not so much to change as to be met by another and stronger current of air, which came pouring through the valley with a howling sound, and then, bursting on the lake, drove its waters in a furrow before it. The little boat started, and swerved like a frightened creature; and the sail, distended to its utmost, cowered down to the water's edge.

"No danger in the world, sir," said a young dandy nearby, who knew as little about boating on Scottish lakes as he did about most things anywhere else. Meanwhile, the air had grown chilly, the sun had set behind the hills, and the boating party, seemingly tired of their repetitive activity, turned the boat's bow toward the shore. For a few minutes, they moved forward with an increasingly bulging sail in the direction they wanted, when suddenly the breeze didn't just change; it was met by a powerful gust of wind that came rushing through the valley with a howling sound, and then, crashing onto the lake, pushed its waters into a furrow. The little boat jolted and swerved like a frightened animal; the sail, fully expanded, curled down to the water's edge.

"Good God! why don't they lower that sail? Down with it! down with it!" shouted the same deep voice from the balcony, regardless of the impossibility of being heard. But the admonition was needless; the boatman, with quick, eager motions, was trying to lower it. Still it bent, fuller and fuller, lower and lower. The man evidently strained with desperate strength, defeating, perhaps, with the clumsiness of anxiety, the end in view; when, too impatient, apparently, to witness their urgent peril without lending his aid, the figure of Captain H—— rose up; in one instant a piercing scream was borne faintly to shore—the boat whelmed over, and all were in the water.

"Good God! Why don't they lower that sail? Get it down! Get it down!" shouted the same deep voice from the balcony, even though it was impossible to be heard. But the warning was unnecessary; the boatman, moving quickly and eagerly, was trying to lower it. Still, it bent, fuller and fuller, lower and lower. The man was clearly straining with desperate strength, probably hindering the goal with his anxious clumsiness. When he could no longer bear to watch their urgent danger without helping, Captain H—— stood up; in an instant, a piercing scream was faintly carried to shore—the boat capsized, and everyone was in the water.

For a few dreadful seconds nothing was seen of the unhappy creatures; then a cap floated, and then two struggling figures rose to the surface. One was evidently the child, for his cap was off, and his fair hair was seen; the other head was covered. This latter buffeted the waters with all the violence of a helpless, drowning man; then he threw his arms above his head, sank, and rose no more. The boy struggled less and less, and seemed dead to all resistance before he sank, too. The boat floated keel upward, almost within reach of the sufferers; and now that the waters had closed over them, the third figure was observed, for the first time, at a considerable distance, slowly and laboriously swimming toward it, and in a few moments two arms were flung over it, and there he hung. It was one of those scenes which the heart quails to look on, yet which chains the spectator to the spot. The whole had passed in less than a minute: fear—despair—agony—and death, had been pressed into one of those short minutes, of which so many pass without our knowing how. It is well. Idleness, vanity, or vice—all that dismisses thought—may dally with time, but the briefest space is too long for that excess of consciousness where time seems to stand still.

For a few terrible seconds, nothing was visible of the unfortunate individuals; then a cap floated by, followed by two struggling figures breaking the surface. One was clearly the child, his cap gone, revealing his fair hair; the other head was covered. This second person thrashed in the water with all the force of someone drowning and then raised his arms above his head, sank, and didn’t surface again. The boy fought less and less, appearing to give up the struggle before he vanished, too. The boat flipped upside down, almost within reach of the victims; and now that the water had closed over them, a third figure was spotted for the first time, slowly and laboriously swimming toward it. Moments later, two arms wrapped around it, and he hung on. It was one of those scenes that made the heart shudder to witness, yet held onlookers in place. The entire event unfolded in less than a minute: fear—despair—agony—and death were compressed into one of those brief moments that often pass without us realizing it. It's strange. Idleness, vanity, or vice—all those things that distract us—might linger with time, but even the shortest moment is too long for that overwhelming awareness where time seems to freeze.

At this moment a lovely and gentle-looking young woman entered the room. It was evident that she knew nothing of the dreadful scene that had just occurred, nor did she now remark the intense excitement which still riveted the spectators to the balcony; for, seeking, apparently, to avoid all intercourse with strangers, she had seated herself, with a book, on the chair farthest removed from the window. Nor did she look up at the first rush of hurried steps into the room; but, when she did, there was something which arrested her attention, for every eye was fixed upon her with an undefinable expression of horror, and every foot seemed to shrink back from approaching her. There was also a murmur as of one common and irrepressible feeling through the whole house; quick footsteps were heard as of men impelled by some dreadful anxiety; doors were banged; voices shouted; and, could any one have stood by a calm and indifferent spectator, it would have been interesting to mark the sudden change from the abstracted and composed look with which Mrs. H—— (for she it was) first raised her head from her book to the painful restlessness[Pg 80] of inquiry with which she now glanced from eye to eye, and seemed to question what manner of tale they told.

At that moment, a beautiful and gentle-looking young woman walked into the room. It was clear that she was unaware of the horrific scene that had just happened, nor did she notice the intense excitement that still kept the spectators glued to the balcony. Trying to avoid any interaction with strangers, she had taken a seat with a book in the chair farthest from the window. She didn’t look up when the first wave of hurried footsteps entered the room; however, when she eventually did, something caught her attention. Every eye was fixed on her with an inexplicable expression of horror, and everyone seemed to instinctively step back from her. There was a murmur that spread throughout the house, charged with a shared, uncontrollable feeling; quick footsteps echoed as men rushed around, driven by some terrible anxiety; doors slammed; voices shouted. If anyone had stood by as a calm and indifferent observer, it would have been fascinating to see the sudden shift from the focused and serene expression with which Mrs. H—— (for it was she) first lifted her head from her book to the uneasy curiosity with which she now scanned the faces around her, seeming to question what kind of story they were telling.

It is something awful and dreadful to stand before a fellow-creature laden with a sorrow which, however we may commiserate it, it is theirs alone to bear; to be compelled to tear away that vail of unconsciousness which alone hides their misery from their sight; and to feel that the faintness gathering round our own heart alone enables theirs to continue beating with tranquillity. We feel less almost of pity for the suffering we are about to inflict than for the peace which we are about to remove; and the smile of unconsciousness which precedes the knowledge of evil is still more painful to look back upon than the bitterest tear that follows it. And, if such be the feelings of the messenger of heavy tidings, the mind that is to receive them is correspondingly actuated. For who is there that thanks you really for concealing the evil that was already arrived—for prolonging the happiness that was already gone? Who cares for a reprieve when sentence is still to follow? It is a pitiful soul that does not prefer the sorrow of certainty to the peace of deceit; or, rather, it is a blessed provision which enables us to acknowledge the preference when it is no longer in our power to choose. It seems intended as a protection to the mind from something so degrading to it as an unreal happiness, that both those who have to inflict misery and those who have to receive it should alike despise its solace. Those who have trod the very brink of a precipice, unknowing that it yawned beneath, look back to those moments of their ignorance with more of horror than of comfort; such security is too close to danger for the mind ever to separate them again. Nor need the bearer of sorrow embitter his errand by hesitations and scruples how to disclose it; he need not pause for a choice of words or form of statement. In no circumstance of life does the soul act so utterly independent of all outward agency; it waits for no explanation, wants no evidence; at the furthest idea of danger it flies at once to its weakest part; an embarrassed manner will rouse suspicions, and a faltered word confirm them. Dreadful things never require precision of terms—they are wholly guessed before they are half-told. Happiness the heart believes not in till it stands at our very threshold; misery it flies at as if eager to meet.

It’s truly awful and heartbreaking to stand in front of someone who’s carrying a sorrow that, no matter how much we sympathize, only they can bear; to be forced to strip away that veil of ignorance that keeps their pain hidden from them; and to realize that the faintness settling around our own heart is what allows theirs to keep beating calmly. We feel less pity for the pain we're about to cause than for the peace we're about to take away; and the innocent smile before they know the truth is even harder to look back on than the hardest tear that follows. And if these are the feelings of the messenger bringing bad news, the mind receiving it feels similarly affected. Who genuinely thanks you for hiding the bad news that’s already there—for extending a happiness that’s already lost? Who cares for extra time when a verdict is still pending? It’s a sad soul that doesn’t prefer the certainty of sorrow over the comfort of lies; or rather, it’s a kind blessing that allows us to recognize this preference when we can no longer choose. It seems to serve as a shield for the mind from something as degrading as a false happiness, so that both those who bring suffering and those who receive it end up despising its comfort. Those who have nearly teetered off a cliff, unaware of the danger below, look back at those moments of ignorance with more horror than comfort; that false sense of security is too close to danger for the mind to separate them again. The messenger of sorrow doesn’t need to make their task harder by hesitating or worrying about how to break the news; they don’t have to search for the right words or phrasing. In no situation does the soul act so completely independent of outside factors; it doesn’t wait for explanations, nor does it need proof; at the first thought of danger, it instantly goes for its most vulnerable part; an awkward demeanor will raise suspicions, and a stammered word will confirm them. Terrible things don’t need precise language—they’re understood before they're fully explained. The heart doesn’t believe in happiness until it’s right at our door; but it rushes toward misery, almost eager to confront it.

So it was with the unfortunate Mrs. H——; no one spoke of the accident, no one pointed to the lake; no connecting link seemed to exist between the security of ignorance and the agony of knowledge. At one moment she raised her head in placid indifference, at the next she knew that her husband and child were lying beneath the waters. And did she faint, or fall as one stricken? No: for the suspicion was too sudden to be sustained; and the next instant came the thought, This must be a dream; God can not have done it. And the eyes were closed, and the convulsed hands pressed tight over them, as if she would shut out mental vision as well; and groans and sobs burst from the crowd, and men[Pg 81] dashed from the room, unable to bear it; and women, too, untrue to their calling. And there was weeping and wringing of hands, and one weak woman fainted; but still no sound or movement came from her on whom the burden had fallen. Then came the dreadful revulsion of feeling; and, with contracted brow and gasping breath, and voice pitched almost to a scream, she said, "It is not true—tell me—it is not true—tell me—tell me!" And, advancing with desperate gestures, she made for the balcony. All recoiled before her; when one gentle woman, small and delicate as herself, opposed her, and, with streaming eyes and trembling limbs, stood before her. "Oh, go not there—go not there! cast your heavy burden on the Lord!" These words broke the spell. Mrs. H—— uttered a cry which long rang in the ears of those that heard it, and sank, shivering and powerless, in the arms of the kind stranger.

So it was with the unfortunate Mrs. H——; no one talked about the accident, no one pointed to the lake; there seemed to be no connection between the comfort of ignorance and the pain of knowing. One moment she lifted her head, seemingly indifferent, and the next, she realized that her husband and child were lying beneath the water. And did she faint, or collapse as if struck? No: the suspicion was too sudden to bear; and in the next instant came the thought, This must be a dream; God can’t have done this. Her eyes were closed, and her clenched hands pressed tightly over them, as if she wanted to block out the mental image as well; groans and sobs erupted from the crowd, and men[Pg 81] rushed out of the room, unable to take it; and women, too, failing in their duty. There was weeping and wringing of hands, and one fragile woman fainted; but still no sound or movement came from her who bore the burden. Then came the awful shift in emotions; with a furrowed brow, gasping for breath, and a voice nearly a scream, she said, "It's not true—tell me—it’s not true—tell me—tell me!" Advancing with frantic gestures, she headed for the balcony. Everyone shrank back; then one gentle woman, small and delicate like her, stepped in front of her, tears streaming down her face, shaking all over. "Oh, don’t go there—don’t go there! Cast your heavy burden on the Lord!" These words broke the spell. Mrs. H—— let out a cry that echoed in the ears of those who heard it and sank, trembling and powerless, into the arms of the kind stranger.

Meanwhile, the dreadful scene had been witnessed from all parts of the hotel, and every male inmate poured from it. The listless tourist of fashion forgot his languor, the way-worn pedestrian his fatigue. The hill down to the lake was trodden by eager, hurrying figures, all anxious to give that which in such cases it is a relief to give, viz., active assistance. Nor were these all, for down came the sturdy shepherd from the hills; and the troops of ragged, bare-legged urchins from all sides; and distant figures of men and women were seen pressing forward to help or to hear; and the hitherto deserted-looking valley was active with life. Meanwhile, the survivor hung motionless over the upturned boat, borne about at the will of the waters, which were now lashed into great agitation. No one could tell whether it was Captain H—— or the Highland boatman, and no one could wish for the preservation of the one more than the other. For life is life to all; and the poor man's wife and family may have less time to mourn, but more cause to want. And before the boat, that was manning with eager volunteers, had left the shore, down came also a tall, raw-boned woman, breathless, more apparently with exertion than anxiety—her eyes dry as stones, and her cheeks red with settled color; one child dragging at her heels, another at her breast. It was the boatman's wife. Different, indeed, was her suspense to that of the sufferer who had been left above; but, perhaps, equally true to her capacity. With her it was fury rather than distress; she scolded the bystanders, chid the little squalling child, and abused her husband by turns.

Meanwhile, the terrifying scene was seen from all corners of the hotel, and every man inside rushed out. The fashionable tourist forgot his boredom, and the weary pedestrian shook off his fatigue. The hill down to the lake was thronged with eager, hurried figures, all wanting to offer what is usually a relief in such situations—active help. And there were more people joining in; down came the sturdy shepherd from the hills, along with groups of ragged, bare-legged kids from all around. Distant figures of men and women could be seen moving forward to help or to find out what was happening, and the once-empty valley was now bustling with life. Meanwhile, the survivor hung still over the overturned boat, tossed around by the water, which was now in a frenzy. No one could tell whether it was Captain H—— or the Highland boatman, and no one cared to save one over the other. Because life matters to everyone; the poor man’s wife and family may have less time to grieve, but they have more reason to want. And before the boat, manned by eager volunteers, had left the shore, a tall, raw-boned woman came running, breathless—more from exertion than worry—her eyes dry as stones and her cheeks flushed. One child was tugging at her heels, another clung to her chest. It was the boatman's wife. Her anxiety was different from that of the person left behind, but perhaps just as intense in her own way. For her, it was fury rather than distress; she scolded the onlookers, reprimanded the wailing child, and cursed her husband in turns.

"How dare he gang to risk his life, wi' six bairns at hame? Ae body knew nae sail was safe on the lake for twa hours thegether; mair fule he to try!" And then she flung the roaring child on to the grass, bade the other mind it, strode half-leg high into the water to help to push off the boat; and then, returning to a place where she could command a view of its movements, she took up the child and hushed it tenderly to sleep. Like her, every one now sought some elevated position, and the progress of the[Pg 82] boat seemed to suspend every other thought. It soon neared the fatal spot, and in another minute was alongside the upturned boat; the figure was now lifted carefully in, something put round him, and, from the languor of his movements, and the care taken, the first impression on shore was that Captain H—— was the one spared. But it was a mercy to Mrs. H—— that she was not in a state to know these surmises; for soon the survivor sat steadily upright, worked his arms, and rubbed his head, as if to restore animation; and, long before the boat reached the shore, the coarse figure and garments of the Highland boatman were distantly recognized. Up started his wife. Unaccustomed to mental emotions of any sudden kind, they were strange and burdensome to her.

"How could he dare to risk his life with six kids at home? Everybody knew that no boat was safe on the lake for at least two hours; what a fool to try!" Then she tossed the screaming child onto the grass, told the other kid to watch it, waded into the water to help push off the boat, and then, finding a place where she could see its movements, picked up the child and gently rocked it to sleep. Like her, everyone else was looking for a higher spot, and all thoughts were focused on the progress of the[Pg 82] boat. It soon approached the dangerous area and, in another minute, was next to the capsized boat; the figure was carefully lifted in, something was wrapped around him, and from the sluggishness of his movements and the care shown, the first assumption on the shore was that Captain H—— was the one who survived. But it was a blessing for Mrs. H—— that she was not in a state to understand these speculations; soon the survivor sat up straight, moved his arms, and rubbed his head as if trying to regain his strength; and long before the boat reached the shore, the rugged figure and clothes of the Highland boatman were recognized from a distance. His wife leapt up. Not used to sudden emotional experiences, they felt strange and heavy to her.

"What, Meggy! no stay to welcome your husband!" said a bystander.

"What, Meggy! Aren't you going to stay and welcome your husband?" said a bystander.

"Walcome him yoursal!" she replied; "I hae no the time. I maun get his dry claes, and het his parritch; and that's the best walcome I can gie him." And so, perhaps, the husband thought, too.

"Welcome him yourself!" she replied; "I don't have the time. I need to get his dry clothes and heat his porridge; and that's the best welcome I can give him." And so, perhaps, the husband thought, too.

And now, what was there more to do? The bodies of Captain H—— and his little son had sunk in seventy fathom deep of water. If, in their hidden currents and movements they cast their victims aloft to the surface, all well; if not, no human hand could reach them. There was nothing to do! Two beings had ceased to exist, who, as far as regarded the consciousness and sympathies of the whole party, had never existed at all before. There had been no influence upon them in their lives, there was no blank to them in their deaths. They had witnessed a dreadful tragedy; they knew that she who had risen that morning a happy wife and mother was now widowed and childless, with a weight of woe upon her, and a life of mourning before her; but there were no forms to observe, no rites to prepare; nothing necessarily to interfere with one habit of the day, or to change one plan for the morrow. It was only a matter of feeling; a great only, it is true; but, as with every thing in life, from the merest trifle to the most momentous occurrence, the matter varied with the individual who felt. All pitied, some sympathized, but few ventured to help. Some wished themselves a hundred miles off, because they could not help her; others wished the same, because she distressed them; and the solitary back room, hidden from all view of the lake, to which the sufferer had been home, after being visited by a few well-meaning or curious women, was finally deserted by all save the kind lady we have mentioned, and a good-natured maid-servant, the drudge of the hotel, who came in occasionally to assist.

And now, what was left to do? The bodies of Captain H—— and his young son had sunk seventy fathoms deep in the water. If, in their hidden currents and shifts, they brought their victims back to the surface, great; if not, no human hand could reach them. There was nothing to be done! Two people had ceased to exist, and in the eyes of the whole group, they had never truly existed at all. Their lives had had no impact on anyone, and there was no void left by their deaths. They had witnessed a terrible tragedy; they knew that the woman who had woken up that morning a happy wife and mother was now widowed and childless, burdened by grief, with a lifetime of mourning ahead of her; but there were no formalities to observe, no rituals to arrange; nothing to disrupt anyone's daily routine or alter plans for tomorrow. It was just a matter of feeling; a significant one, it’s true; but, like everything in life, from the smallest detail to the biggest events, the matter was different for each person experiencing it. Everyone felt pity, some showed sympathy, but few dared to offer help. Some wished they could be a hundred miles away because they felt powerless to assist her; others wanted the same simply because her distress made them uncomfortable; and the lonely back room, out of sight of the lake, to which the grieving woman had returned after being visited by a few well-meaning or curious women, was ultimately abandoned by everyone except for the kind lady we mentioned earlier and a friendly maid, the hotel’s helper, who came in occasionally to lend a hand.

We have told the tale exactly as it occurred; the reader knows both plot and conclusion: and now there only remains to say something of the ways of human sorrow, and something, too, of the ways of human goodness.

We’ve shared the story just as it happened; the reader knows both the plot and the ending. Now, we just need to say a bit about the nature of human sorrow and also about the nature of human goodness.

Grief falls differently on different hearts; some must vent it, others can not. The coldest will be the most unnerved, the tenderest the most possessed; there is no rule. As for this poor[Pg 83] lady, hers was of that sudden and extreme kind for which insensibility is at first mercifully provided; and it came to her, and yet not entirely—suspending the sufferings of the mind, but not deadening all the sensation of the body; for she shivered and shuddered with that bloodless cold which kept her pale, numb, and icy, like one in the last hours before death. A large fire was lighted, warm blankets were wrapped round her, but the cold was too deep to be reached; and the kind efforts made to restore animation were more a relief to her attendants than to her. And yet Miss Campbell stopped sometimes from the chafing of the hands, and let those blue fingers lie motionless in hers, and looked up at that wan face with an expression as if she wished that the eyes might never open again, but that death might at once restore what it had just taken. For some hours no change ensued, and then it was gradual; the hands were withdrawn from those that held them, and first laid, and then clenched together; deep sighs of returning breath and returning knowledge broke from her; the wrappers were thrown off, first feebly, and then restlessly. There were no dramatic startings, no abrupt questionings; but, as blood came back to the veins, anguish came back to the heart. All the signs of excessive mental oppression now began, a sad train as they are, one extreme leading to the other. Before, there had been the powerlessness of exertion, now, there was the powerlessness of control; before she had been benumbed by insensibility, now, she was impelled as if bereft of sense. Like one distracted with intense bodily pain, her whole frame seemed strained to endure. The gentlest of voices whispered comfort, she heard not; the kindest of arms supported her, she rested not. There was the unvarying moan, the weary pacing, the repetition of the same action, the measurement of the same distance, the body vibrating as a mere machine to the restless recurrence of the same thought.

Grief affects different people in different ways; some need to express it, while others can't. The coldest souls may be the most disturbed, while the most sensitive can become completely overwhelmed; there are no rules. As for this poor[Pg 83] woman, her grief was sudden and extreme, and at first, insensibility was mercifully provided for her; it came over her, but not entirely—it numbed her mind’s suffering but didn’t completely dull her physical sensations. She trembled with a coldness that made her pale, numb, and icy, like someone in the final moments of life. A large fire was lit, and warm blankets were wrapped around her, but the cold was too intense to feel warmth; the kind attempts to revive her brought more comfort to her caregivers than to her. Yet, Miss Campbell would sometimes pause from rubbing her hands and let those blue fingers rest motionless in hers, gazing at that pale face with an expression that seemed to wish the eyes would never open again, longing for death to restore what it had just taken. For a few hours, nothing changed, and then it started to happen gradually; her hands were pulled away from those holding them and were first laid down, then clenched together. Deep sighs of returning breath and regained awareness escaped her; the blankets were thrown off, initially weakly, then more restlessly. There were no dramatic awakenings or sudden questions, but as blood flowed back into her veins, pain returned to her heart. All the signs of extreme mental distress began to appear, a sad progression where one extreme gave way to the other. Earlier, she had experienced a powerlessness to act; now, she felt a powerlessness to control herself. Previously numb with insensibility, she was now driven as if she had lost her mind. Like someone tormented by severe physical pain, her entire body seemed stretched to the limit. The softest voices offered comfort, but she didn’t hear them; the kindest arms supported her, but she didn’t rest. There was the unending moan, the weary pacing, the repetitive actions, the measuring of the same distance, her body moving like a machine caught up in the restless cycle of the same thought.

We have said that every outer sign of woe was there—all but that which great sorrows set flowing, but the greatest dry up—she shed no tears! Tears are things for which a preparation of the heart is needful; they are granted to anxiety for the future, or lament for the past. They flow with reminiscences of our own, or with the example of others; they are sent to separations we have long dreaded, and to disappointments we can not forget; they come when our hearts are softened, or when our hearts are wearied; but, in the first amazement of unlooked-for woe, they find no place: the cup that is suddenly whelmed over lets no drop of water escape.

We’ve said that every outward sign of grief was there—all except the one that deep sorrows bring out, but the most intense sorrows stifle it—she didn’t shed any tears! Tears require a heart that’s ready; they come from worrying about the future or grieving for the past. They flow with memories of our own or with what we see in others; they’re sent for separations we’ve long feared and disappointments we can’t forget; they arise when our hearts are tender or when we’re exhausted; but in those first moments of unexpected sorrow, they have no place: the cup that suddenly overflows doesn’t let a single drop escape.

It was evident, however, through all the unruliness of such distress, that the sufferer was a creature of gentle and considerate nature; in the whirlpool which convulsed every faculty of her mind, the smooth surface of former habits was occasionally thrown up. Though the hand which sought to support her was cast aside with a restless, excited movement, it was sought the next instant with a momentary pressure of contrition. Though the head was turned away one instant from the whisper of consolation with a gesture[Pg 84] of impatience, yet it was bowed the next as if in entreaty of forgiveness. Poor creature! what effort she could make to allay the storm which was rioting within her was evidently made for the sake of those around. With so much and so suddenly to bear, she still showed the habit of forbearance.

It was clear, though, amidst all the chaos of her distress, that the sufferer was a person of gentle and caring nature; even in the turmoil that shook her mind, glimpses of her past calm habits occasionally surfaced. Although she pushed away the hand that tried to help her with an anxious, restless motion, she reached for it again in the next moment with a brief sign of regret. Though she turned her head away momentarily from the words of comfort with a gesture of impatience, it was bowed the next instant as if she was silently asking for forgiveness. Poor thing! The effort she made to calm the storm raging inside her was clearly for the sake of those around her. With so much to endure so suddenly, she still displayed the habit of patience.

Meanwhile night had far advanced; many had been the inquiries and expressions of sympathy made at Mrs. H——'s door; but now, one by one, the parties retired each to their rooms. Few, however, rested that night as usual; however differently the terrible picture might be carried on the mind during the hours of light, it forced itself with almost equal vividness upon all in those of darkness. The father struggling to reach the child, and then throwing up his arms in agony, and that fair little head borne about unresistingly by the waves before they covered it over—these were the figures which haunted many a pillow. Or, if the recollection of that scene was lulled for a while, it was recalled again by the weary sound of those footsteps which told of a mourner who rested not. Of course, among the number and medley of characters lying under that roof, there was the usual proportion of the selfish and the careless. None, however, slept that night without confessing, in word or thought, that life and death are in the hands of the Lord; and not all, it is to be hoped, forgot the lesson. One young man, in particular, possessed of fine intellectual powers, but which unfortunately had been developed among a people who, God help them! affect to believe only what they understand, was indebted to this day and night for a great change in his opinions. His heart was kind, though his understanding was perverted; and the thought of that young, lovely, and feeble woman, on whom a load of misery had fallen which would have crushed the strongest of his own sex, roused within him the strongest sense of the insufficiency of all human aid or human strength for beings who are framed to love and yet ordained to lose. He was oppressed with compassion, miserable with sympathy, he longed with all the generosity of a manly heart to do something, to suggest something, that should help her, or satisfy himself. But what were fortitude, philosophy, strength of mind? Mockeries, nay, more, imbecilities, which he dared not mention to her, nor so much as think of in the same thought with her woe. Either he must accuse the Power who had inflicted the wound, and so deep he had not sunk, or he must acknowledge His means of cure. Impelled, therefore, by a feeling equally beyond his doubting or his proving, he did that which for years German sophistry had taught him to forbear; he gave but little, but he felt that he gave his best—he prayed for the suffering creature, and in the name of One who suffered for all, and from that hour God's grace forsook him not.

Meanwhile, night had progressed significantly; there had been many inquiries and expressions of sympathy at Mrs. H——'s door, but now, one by one, the visitors retired to their rooms. Few, however, found rest that night as usual; no matter how the terrible image might be processed in their minds during the daylight hours, it intruded just as vividly upon them in the dark. The father struggling to reach his child, then throwing up his arms in agony, and that sweet little head being helplessly carried away by the waves before it was submerged—these images haunted many a pillow. Or, if the memory of that scene faded for a moment, it was brought back by the weary sound of footsteps, signaling a mourner who could find no peace. Among the various characters gathered under that roof, there was the usual mix of the selfish and the indifferent. Yet, none slept that night without acknowledging, in word or thought, that life and death are in the hands of the Lord; and not all, it is hoped, forgot the lesson. One young man, in particular, was gifted with impressive intellectual abilities, but unfortunately, these had been shaped among a people who, God help them! tend to believe only what they can understand. This day and night prompted a significant shift in his views. Although his heart was kind, his understanding was distorted; the thought of that young, beautiful, and fragile woman, burdened with a grief that would have crushed even the strongest of men, awakened in him a profound awareness of the inadequacy of all human aid or strength for those destined to love yet fated to lose. He was overwhelmed with compassion, suffering alongside her, and longed with all the generosity of a noble heart to do something, to suggest something that might help her or ease his own turmoil. But what were courage, philosophy, strength of mind? They felt like mockeries, or worse, foolishness, that he dared not mention to her or even think of in relation to her sorrow. He faced a choice: either he must blame the Power that had inflicted the wound, which he was not willing to do, or he had to acknowledge His means of healing. Therefore, compelled by a feeling beyond his doubts or proofs, he did what for years German philosophical teachings had advised him to avoid; he gave little, but he felt that he gave his best—he prayed for the suffering soul, and in the name of One who suffered for all, and from that moment on, God's grace never left him.

But the most characteristic sympathizer on the occasion was Sir Thomas ——, the fine old gentleman who had shouted so loudly from the balcony. He was at home in this valley, owned the whole range of hills on one side of the lake[Pg 85] from their fertile bases to their bleak tops, took up his abode generally every summer in this hotel, and felt for the stricken woman as if she had been a guest of his own. Ever since the fatal accident he had gone about in a perfect fret of commiseration, inquiring every half-hour at her door how she was, or what she had taken. Severe bodily illness or intense mental distress had never fallen upon that bluff person and warm heart, and abstinence from food was in either case the proof of an extremity for which he had every compassion, but of which he had no knowledge. He prescribed, therefore, for the poor lady every thing that he would have relished himself, and nothing at that moment could have made him so happy as to have been allowed to send her up the choicest meal that the country could produce. Not that his benevolence was at all limited to such manifestations; if it did not deal in sentiment, it took the widest range of practice. His laborers were dispatched round the lake to watch for any traces of the late catastrophe; he himself kept up an hour later planning how he could best promote the comfort of her onward journey and of her present stay; and though the good old gentleman was now snoring loudly over the very apartment which contained the object of his sympathy, he would have laid down his life to save those that were gone, and half his fortune to solace her who was left.

But the most notable sympathizer at the time was Sir Thomas ——, the distinguished old gentleman who had shouted so loudly from the balcony. He was well-established in this valley, owned the entire range of hills on one side of the lake[Pg 85] from their fertile bases to their rugged peaks, generally spent every summer at this hotel, and felt for the distressed woman as if she were a guest in his own home. Ever since the tragic accident, he had been in a constant state of worry, checking every half-hour at her door to see how she was doing or what she had eaten. Severe physical illness or deep mental distress had never affected that hearty and warm-hearted man, and a lack of food was in either case a sign of extreme distress for which he had all the compassion, but no understanding. So, he prescribed for the poor lady everything he would have enjoyed himself, and nothing would have made him happier at that moment than to send her the finest meal the area could offer. Not that his kindness was restricted to such gestures; if it wasn't about feelings, it took the broadest range of action. His workers were sent around the lake to look for any signs of the recent tragedy; he himself stayed up an hour later, planning how to best ensure her comfort during her onward journey and current stay; and although the good old gentleman was now snoring loudly in the very room that held the object of his concern, he would have given his life to save those who were lost and half his fortune to comfort her who remained.

Some hours had elapsed, the footsteps had ceased, there was quiet, if not rest, in the chamber of mourning; and, shortly after sunrise, a side door in the hotel opened, and she who had been as a sister to the stranger, never seen before, came slowly forth. She was worn with watching, her heart was sick with the sight and sounds of such woe, and she sought the refreshment of the outer air and the privacy of the early day. It was a dawn promising a day as beautiful as the preceding; the sun was beaming mildly through an opening toward the east, wakening the tops of the nearest hills, while all the rest of the beautiful range lay huge and colorless, nodding, as it were, to their drowsy reflections beneath, and the lake itself looked as calm and peaceful as if the winds had never swept over its waters, nor those waters over all that a wife and mother had loved. Man is such a speck on this creation of which he is lord, that had every human being now sleeping on the green sides of the hills, been lying deep among their dark feet in the lake, it would not have shown a ripple the more. Miss Campbell, meanwhile, wandered slowly on, and though apparently unmindful of the beauty of the scene, she was evidently soothed by its influence. All that dreary night long had she cried unto God in ceaseless prayer, and felt that without His help in her heart, and His word on her lips, she had been but as a strengthless babe before the sight of that anguish. But here beneath His own heavens her communings were freer; her soul seemed not so much to need Him below, as to rise to Him above; and the solemn dejection upon a very careworn, but sweet face, became less painful, but perhaps more touching. In her wanderings she had now left the hotel to[Pg 86] her left hand, the boatman's clay cottage was just above, and below a little rough pier of stones, to an iron ring in one of which the boat was usually attached. She had stood on that self-same spot the day before and watched Captain H—— and his little son as they walked down to the pier, summoned the boatman, and launched into the cool, smooth water. She now went down herself, and stood with a feeling of awe upon the same stones they had so lately left. The shores were loose and shingly, many footsteps were there, but one particularly riveted her gaze. It was tiny in shape and light in print, and a whole succession of them went off toward the side as if following a butterfly, or attracted by a bright stone. Alas! they we're the last prints of that little foot on the shores of this world! Miss Campbell had seen the first thunderbolt of misery burst upon his mother; she had borne the sight of her as she lay stunned, and as she rose frenzied, but that tiny footprint was worse than all, and she burst into a passionate fit of tears. She felt as if it were desecration to sweep them away, as if she could have shrined them round from the winds and waves, and thoughtless tread of others; but a thought came to check her. What did it matter how the trace of his little foot, or how the memory of his short life were obliterated from this earth? There was One above who had numbered every hair of his innocent head, and in His presence she humbly hoped both father and child were now rejoicing.

Some hours had passed, the footsteps had stopped, and there was silence, if not peace, in the room of mourning. Shortly after sunrise, a side door in the hotel opened, and the woman who had been like a sister to the stranger, whom she had never seen before, stepped out slowly. She looked worn from watching, her heart heavy with the sight and sounds of such sorrow, and she sought the refreshment of the fresh air and the solitude of the early day. It was a dawn promising a day as beautiful as the one before; the sun was shining gently from the east, waking up the tops of the nearest hills, while the rest of the stunning range lay massive and colorless, as if nodding to their sleepy reflections below. The lake itself looked calm and peaceful, as if the winds had never swept across its waters, nor those waters over all that a wife and mother had cherished. Man is such a tiny part of this creation he rules over that if every person now lying asleep on the green hillsides had been resting deep in the lake's dark depths, it wouldn’t have made a ripple. Miss Campbell, meanwhile, wandered slowly on, and although she seemed oblivious to the scene's beauty, she was clearly comforted by its presence. All through that dreary night, she had cried out to God in endless prayer, feeling that without His support in her heart and His words on her lips, she was like a powerless baby before such anguish. But out here beneath His skies, her thoughts felt freer; her spirit seemed to need less of Him down here and more to rise to Him above. The solemn sadness on her weary but gentle face became less painful, but perhaps more poignant. In her wandering, she had now left the hotel to[Pg 86] her left, with the boatman’s simple cottage just above, and below was a little rough stone pier with an iron ring where the boat was usually tied. She had stood on that very spot the day before, watching Captain H—— and his young son as they walked down to the pier, called for the boatman, and launched into the cool, smooth water. Now she walked down herself and stood in awe on the same stones they had just left. The shores were loose and pebbly, and many footprints were there, but one set particularly caught her attention. It was small in shape and light to the touch, and a whole path of them led off to the side as if following a butterfly or drawn by a shiny stone. Alas! they were the last prints of that little foot on this world's shores! Miss Campbell had seen the first bolt of misery hit his mother; she had endured the sight of her as she lay stunned and as she rose in a frenzy, but that tiny footprint was worse than everything else, and she broke down in tears. She felt it was a violation to sweep them away, as if she could protect them from the winds and waves and the careless steps of others. But a thought stopped her. What did it matter how the mark of his little foot, or the memory of his brief life, disappeared from this earth? There was One above who had counted every hair on his innocent head, and in His presence, she humbly hoped that both father and child were now celebrating.

She was just turning away when the sound of steps approached, and the boatman's wife came up. Her features were coarse and her frame was gaunt, as we have said, but she was no longer the termagant of the day before, nor was she ever so. But the lower classes, in the most civilized lands, are often, both in joy and grief, an enigma to those above them; if nature, rare alike in all ranks, speak not for them, they have no conventional imitation to put in her place. The feeling of intense suspense was new to her, and the violence she had assumed had been the awkwardness which, under many eyes, knew not otherwise how to express or, conceal; but she had sound Scotch sense, and a tender woman's heart, and spoke them both now truly, if not gracefully.

She was just about to turn away when she heard footsteps approaching, and the boatman's wife came up. Her features were rough, and her body was thin, as we mentioned before, but she was no longer the shrew from the day before, nor had she ever truly been. However, the lower classes, even in the most civilized countries, can often seem like a puzzle in both joy and sorrow to those who are above them; if nature, which is rare in all social classes, doesn't speak for them, they lack a conventional way to imitate her. The feeling of intense suspense was new to her, and the anger she had shown was really just her awkwardness, not knowing how to express or hide her emotions under many eyes; but she had practical Scottish wisdom and a gentle woman’s heart, and she expressed both of these now honestly, if not elegantly.

"Ye'll be frae the hotel, yonder?" she said; "can ye tell me how the puir leddy has rested? I was up mysel' to the house, and they tell't me they could hear her greeting!"

"You're from the hotel over there?" she said; "can you tell me how the poor lady has been resting? I went up to the house myself, and they told me they could hear her crying!"

Miss Campbell told her in a few words what the reader knows, and asked for her husband.

Miss Campbell briefly explained what the reader already knows and asked about her husband.

"Oh! he's weel eneugh in body, but sair disquieted in mind. No that he's unmindfu' of the mercy of the Lord to himsel', but he can no just keep the thocht away that it was he wha helped those poor creatures to their end." She then proceeded earnestly to exculpate her husband, assuring Miss Campbell that in spite of the heavy wind and the entangled rope, all might even yet have been well if the gentleman had kept his seat. "But I just tell him that there's Ane above, stronger than the wind, who sunk them in the lake, and could have raised them from it, but it was no His pleasure. The puir leddy[Pg 87] would ha' been nane the happier if Andrew had been ta'en as well, and I and the bairns muckle the waur." Then observing where Miss Campbell stood, she continued, in a voice of much emotion, "Ah! I mind them weel as they came awa' down here; the bairnie was playing by as Andrew loosened the boat—the sweet bairnie! so happy and thochtless as he gaed in his beautiful claes—I see him noo!" and the poor woman wiped her eyes. "But there's something ye'll like to see. Jeanie! gang awa' up, and bring the little bonnet that hangs on the peg. Andrew went out again with the boat the night, and picked it up. But it will no be dry."

"Oh! he's fine in body, but really troubled in mind. It's not that he's forgotten the Lord's mercy towards himself, but he just can’t shake the thought that he was the one who helped those poor souls to their end." She then earnestly tried to defend her husband, assuring Miss Campbell that despite the strong wind and the tangled rope, everything might still have gone well if the gentleman had stayed seated. "But I tell him that there's Someone above, stronger than the wind, who sank them in the lake, and could have brought them back, but it wasn't His will. The poor lady[Pg 87] wouldn’t have been any happier if Andrew had been taken too, and I and the kids would have been so much worse off." Then noticing where Miss Campbell stood, she continued, her voice filled with emotion, "Oh! I remember them well as they came down here; the little one was playing around while Andrew loosened the boat—the sweet child! so happy and carefree as he got in his lovely clothes—I can see him now!" and the poor woman wiped her eyes. "But there’s something you’ll want to see. Jeanie! go upstairs and get the little bonnet that’s hanging on the peg. Andrew went out with the boat last night and picked it up. But it won’t be dry."

The child returned with a sad token. It was the little fellow's cap; a smart, town-made article, with velvet band, and long silk tassel which had been his first vanity, and his mother had coaxed it smooth as she pulled the peak low down over his fair forehead, and then, fumbling his little fingers into his gloves, had given him a kiss which she little thought was to be the last!

The child came back with a sad reminder. It was the little guy's cap; a stylish, town-made piece, with a velvet band and a long silk tassel that had been his first pride, and his mom had smoothed it out as she pulled the brim down over his fair forehead, and then, as he fumbled his little fingers into his gloves, she had given him a kiss that she little realized was going to be the last!

"I was coming awa' up wi' it mysel', but the leddy will no just bear to see it yet."

"I was bringing it up myself, but the lady just can't bear to see it yet."

"No, not yet," said Miss Campbell, "if ever. Let me take it. I shall remain with her till better friends come here, or she goes to them;" and giving the woman money, which she had difficulty in making her accept, she possessed herself of the cap, and turned away.

"No, not yet," said Miss Campbell, "if ever. Let me take it. I’ll stay with her until closer friends arrive or she goes to them;" and after giving the woman some money, which the woman was reluctant to accept, she took the cap and turned away.

She soon reached the hotel, it was just five o'clock, all blinds were down, and there was no sign of life; but one figure was pacing up and down, and seemed to be watching for her. It was Sir Thomas. His sympathy had broken his sleep in the morning, though it had not disturbed it at night. He began in his abrupt way:

She soon arrived at the hotel; it was only five o'clock, all the blinds were closed, and there was no sign of life. However, one figure was walking back and forth, seemingly waiting for her. It was Sir Thomas. His concern had interrupted his sleep in the morning, although it hadn't affected his rest at night. He started in his usual blunt manner:

"Madam, I have been watching for you. I heard you leave the house. Madam, I feel almost ashamed to lift up my eyes to you; while we have all been wishing and talking, you alone have been acting. We are all obliged to you, madam; there is not a creature here with a heart in them to whom you have not given comfort!"

"Ma'am, I've been waiting for you. I heard you leave the house. I almost feel embarrassed to look you in the eye; while we've all been wishing and talking, you've been the only one actually doing something. We're all grateful to you, ma'am; there isn't a single person here with a heart who you haven't comforted!"

Miss Campbell tried to escape from the honest overflowings of the old man's feelings.

Miss Campbell tried to get away from the old man's genuine emotions.

"You have only done what you liked: very true, madam. It is choking work having to pity without knowing how to help; but I would sooner give ten thousand pounds than see what you have seen. I would do any thing for the poor creature, any thing, but I could not look at her." He then told her that his men had been sent with the earliest dawn to different points of the lake, but as yet without finding any traces of the late fatal accident; and then his eyes fell upon the cap in Miss Campbell's hand, and he at once guessed the history. "Picked up last evening, you say—sad, sad—a dreadful thing!" and his eyes filling more than it was convenient to hold, he turned away, blew his nose, took a short turn, and coming back again, continued, "But tell me, how has she rested? what has she taken? You must not let her weep too much!"

"You’ve only done what you wanted to do: that’s true, ma'am. It’s really frustrating to feel sorry for someone without knowing how to help; but I would rather give ten thousand pounds than witness what you’ve seen. I would do anything for that poor soul, anything, but I just couldn’t bear to look at her.” He then mentioned that his men had been sent out at dawn to various spots around the lake, but so far they hadn’t found any signs of the recent deadly accident. Then his gaze landed on the cap in Miss Campbell’s hand, and he immediately understood the story behind it. “Picked up last night, you say—so sad, so sad—a terrible thing!” As his eyes filled with more tears than he could handle, he looked away, blew his nose, took a brief walk, and then returned, continuing, “But tell me, how has she been? What has she taken? You mustn't let her cry too much!”

"Let her weep!" said Miss Campbell; "I wish I could bid her. She has not shed a tear yet, and mind and body alike want it. I left her[Pg 88] lying back quiet in an arm-chair, but I fear this quiet is worse than what has gone before!"

"Let her cry!" said Miss Campbell; "I wish I could tell her to. She hasn't shed a tear yet, and both her mind and body need it. I left her[Pg 88] resting quietly in an armchair, but I worry that this calm is worse than what came before!"

"God bless my heart!" said Sir Thomas, his eyes now running over without control. "God bless my heart! this is sad work. Not that I ever wished a woman to cry before in my life, if she could help it. Poor thing! poor thing! I'll send for a medical man: the nearest is fifteen miles off!"

"God bless my heart!" said Sir Thomas, his eyes now overflowing with tears. "God bless my heart! this is such a sad situation. I never wished for a woman to cry in my life, if she could avoid it. Poor thing! Poor thing! I’ll call for a doctor; the closest is fifteen miles away!"

"I think it will be necessary. I am now going back to her room."

"I think it's going to be necessary. I'm heading back to her room now."

"Well, ma'am, I won't detain you longer, but don't keep all the good to yourself. Let me know if there is any thing that I, or my men, or," the old gentleman hesitated, "my money, madam, can do, only don't ask me to see her;" and so they each went their way—Sir Thomas to the stables to send off man and horse, and Miss Campbell to the chamber of mourning.

"Well, ma'am, I won't take up any more of your time, but please don't keep all the good to yourself. Let me know if there’s anything that I, my men, or," the old gentleman hesitated, "my money, ma'am, can do, just don’t ask me to see her;" and then they each went their separate ways—Sir Thomas to the stables to send off man and horse, and Miss Campbell to the room of mourning.

She started as she entered; the blind was drawn up, and, leaning against the shutter, in apparent composure, stood Mrs. H——. That composure was dreadful; it was the calm of intense agitation, the silence of boiling heat, the immovability of an object in the most rapid motion. The light was full upon her, showing cheek and forehead flushed, and veins bursting on the small hands. Miss Campbell approached with trembling limbs.

She jumped slightly as she walked in; the blind was raised, and leaning against the window frame, looking composed, stood Mrs. H——. That calmness was terrifying; it was the peace of intense turmoil, the quiet before an explosion, the stillness of something moving at lightning speed. The light illuminated her, revealing flushed cheeks and forehead, with veins bulging on her small hands. Miss Campbell walked over with shaky legs.

"Where is the servant?"—"I did not want her."

"Where's the servant?"—"I didn't want her."

"Will you not rest?"—"I can not!"

"Will you not rest?"—"I can't!"

Miss Campbell was weary and worn out; the picture before her was so terrible, she sunk on the nearest chair in an agony of tears.

Miss Campbell was exhausted and drained; the scene in front of her was so awful that she collapsed into the nearest chair, overcome with tears.

Without changing her position, Mrs. H—— turned her head, and said, gently, "Oh, do not cry so! it is I who ought to cry, but my heart is as dry as my eyes, and my head is so tight, and I can not think for its aching; I can not think, I can not understand, I can not remember, I don't even know your name, then why should this be true? It is I who am ill, they are well, but they never were so long from me before." Then coming forward, her face working, and her breath held tightly, as if a scream were pressing behind, "Tell me," she said, "tell me—my husband and child—" she tried hard to articulate, but the words were lost in a frightful contortion. Miss Campbell mastered herself, she saw the rack of mental torture was strained to the utmost. Neither could bear this much longer. She almost feared resistance, but she felt there was one way to which the sufferer would respond.

Without changing her position, Mrs. H—— turned her head and said gently, "Oh, please don’t cry so! I should be the one crying, but my heart is as dry as my eyes, and my head is so tight that I can't think because of the pain; I can’t think, I can’t understand, I can’t remember, I don’t even know your name, so why should this be real? I’m the one who’s unwell; they are fine, but they've never been away from me this long before." Then, coming forward with her face contorting and her breath held tightly, as if a scream were pressing behind, she said, "Tell me, tell me—my husband and child—" She struggled to articulate her words, but they got lost in a horrific twist of her face. Miss Campbell controlled herself; she saw that the mental torture was pushed to its limit. Neither could bear this much longer. She almost dreaded resistance, but she sensed there was one way in which the suffering woman would respond.

"I am weary and tired," she said; "weary with staying up with you all night. If you will lie down, I will soon come and lie by your side."

"I’m really tired," she said; "tired from staying up with you all night. If you lie down, I'll come and lie next to you soon."

Poor Mrs. H—— said nothing, but let herself be laid upon the bed.

Poor Mrs. H—— said nothing and allowed herself to be laid on the bed.

Three mortal hours passed, she was burnt with a fever which only her own tears could quench; and those wide-open, dry eyes were fearful to see. A knock came to the door, "How is she now?" said Sir Thomas's voice, "The doctor is here: you look as if you wanted him yourself. I'll bring him up."

Three hours went by, and she was burning with a fever that only her own tears could soothe; those wide-open, dry eyes were alarming to see. There was a knock at the door. "How is she now?" Sir Thomas's voice asked. "The doctor is here: you look like you need him too. I'll bring him up."

The medical man entered. Such a case had not occurred in his small country practice before,[Pg 89] but he was a sensible and a kind man, and no practice could have helped him here if he had not been. He heard the whole sad history, felt the throbbing pulse, saw the flush on the face, and wide-open eyes, which now seemed scarcely to notice any thing. He took Miss Campbell into another room, and said that the patient must be instantly roused, and then bled if necessary.

The doctor walked in. He had never encountered a case like this in his small country practice before,[Pg 89] but he was sensible and kind, which was essential since no amount of practice could have prepared him for this situation. He listened to the whole sad story, checked the throbbing pulse, noted the flush on her face, and saw her wide-open eyes that barely seemed to register anything. He took Miss Campbell into another room and said they needed to wake the patient immediately and, if necessary, draw some blood.

"But the first you can undertake better than I, madam." He looked round. "Is there no little object which would recall?—nothing you could bring before her sight? You understand me?"

"But the first one you can handle better than I can, ma'am." He glanced around. "Is there no small item that would remind her?—nothing you could show her? You get what I mean?"

Indeed, Miss Campbell did. She had not sat by that bed-side for the last three hours without feeling and fearing that this was necessary; but, at the same time, she would rather have cut off her own hand than undertaken it. She hesitated—but for a moment, and then whispered something to Sir Thomas.

Indeed, Miss Campbell did. She had not been sitting by that bedside for the last three hours without feeling that this was necessary; however, at the same time, she would rather have cut off her own hand than take it on. She hesitated—but only for a moment, and then whispered something to Sir Thomas.

"God bless my heart!" said he: "who would have thought of it? Yes. I know it made me cry like a child."

"God bless my heart!" he said. "Who would have thought of it? Yeah, I know it made me cry like a baby."

And then he repeated her proposition to the medical man, who gave immediate assent, and she left the room. In a few minutes she entered that of Mrs. H—— with the little boy's cap in her hand, placed it in a conspicuous position before the bed, and then seated herself with a quick, nervous motion by the bed-side. It was a horrid pause, like that which precedes a cruel operation, where you have taken upon yourself the second degree of suffering—that of witnessing it. The cap lay there on the small stone mantle-piece, with its long, drabbled, weeping tassel, like a funeral emblem. It was not many minutes before it caught those eyes for which it was intended. A suppressed exclamation broke from her; she flew from the bed, looked at Miss Campbell one instant in intense inquiry, and the next had the cap in her hands. The touch of that wet object seemed to dissolve the spell; her whole frame trembled with sudden relaxation. She sank, half-kneeling, on the floor, and tears spouted from her eyes. No blessed rain from heaven to famished earth was ever more welcome. Tears, did we say? Torrents! Those eyes, late so hot and dry, were as two arteries of the soul suddenly opened. What a misery that had been which had sealed them up! They streamed over her face, blinding her riveted gaze, falling on her hands, on the cap, on the floor. Meanwhile the much-to-be-pitied sharer of her sorrow knelt by her side, her whole frame scarcely less unnerved than that she sought to support, uttering broken ejaculations and prayers, and joining her tears to those which flowed so passionately. But she had a gentle and meek spirit to deal with. Mrs. H—— crossed her hands over the cap and bowed her head. Thus she continued a minute, and then turning, still on her knees, she laid her head on her companion's shoulder.

And then he repeated her suggestion to the doctor, who immediately agreed, and she left the room. A few minutes later, she entered Mrs. H——'s room with the little boy's cap in her hand, placed it in a noticeable spot in front of the bed, and took a quick, nervous seat by the bedside. It was a dreadful pause, like the moment before a painful operation, where you have chosen to experience a second level of suffering—that of watching it happen. The cap rested there on the small stone mantelpiece, its long, drooping, wet tassel resembling a funeral symbol. It didn’t take long before it caught the attention of the eyes it was meant for. A stifled gasp escaped her; she leaped from the bed, looked at Miss Campbell for a brief moment with intense curiosity, and then she had the cap in her hands. The touch of that damp object seemed to break the spell; her whole body trembled with sudden relief. She sank down, half-kneeling on the floor, and tears streamed from her eyes. No rain from heaven to parched earth was ever more welcome. Tears, did we say? Torrents! Those eyes, once so hot and dry, now flowed like two open veins of the soul. What a sorrow it must have been that had sealed them! They poured over her face, blinding her fixed stare, falling onto her hands, the cap, and the floor. Meanwhile, the poor companion in her grief knelt beside her, her own body barely less shaken than the one she was trying to console, uttering broken phrases and prayers, and adding her tears to those that flowed so fervently. But she dealt with a gentle and meek spirit. Mrs. H—— crossed her hands over the cap and lowered her head. She stayed like that for a minute, then turned, still on her knees, and rested her head on her companion's shoulder.

"Help me up," she said, "for I am without strength." And all weak, trembling, and sobbing, she allowed herself to be undressed and put to bed.

"Help me up," she said, "I don't have any strength." Weak, shaking, and crying, she let herself be undressed and put to bed.

Miss Campbell lay down in the same room. She listened till the quivering, catching sobs had given place to deep-drawn sighs, and these again[Pg 90] to disturbed breathings, and then both slept the sleep of utter exhaustion, and Miss Campbell, fortunately, knew not when the mourner awoke from it.

Miss Campbell lay down in the same room. She listened until the trembling, catching sobs gave way to deep sighs, and those finally turned into disturbed breathing, and then they both fell asleep from sheer exhaustion. Luckily, Miss Campbell didn’t know when the mourner woke up from it.

Oh, the dreary first-fruits of excessive sorrow! The first days of a stricken heart, passed through, writhed through, ground through, we scarcely know or remember how, before the knowledge of the bereavement has become habitual—while it is still struggle and not endurance—the same ceaseless recoil from the same ever-recurring shock. It was a blessing that she was ill, very ill; the body shared something of the weight at first.

Oh, the bleak initial stages of overwhelming grief! The first days of a broken heart, endured, twisted through, ground down, we hardly know or remember how, before the reality of the loss has settled in—while it is still a struggle and not mere endurance—the same relentless backlash from the same recurring blow. It was a relief that she was sick, very sick; the body took on some of the burden at the beginning.

Let no one, untried by such extremity, here lift the word or look of deprecation. Let there not be a thought of what she ought to have done, or what they would have done. God's love is great, and a Christian's faith is strong, but when have the first encounters between old joys and new sorrows been otherwise than fierce? From time to time a few intervals of heavenly composure, wonderful and gracious to the sufferer, may be permitted, and even the dim light of future peace discerned in the distance; but, in a moment, the gauntlet of defiance is thrown again—no matter what—an old look, an old word, which comes rushing unbidden over the soul, and dreadful feelings rise again only to spend themselves by their own violence. It always seems to us as if sorrow had a nature of its own, independent of that whereon it has fallen, and sometimes strangely at variance with it—scorching the gentle, melting the passionate, dignifying the weak, and prostrating the strong—and showing the real nature, habits, or principles of the mind, only in those defenses it raises up during the intervals of relief. With Mrs. H—— these defenses were reared on the only sure base, and though the storm would sweep down her bulwarks, and cover all over with the furious tide of grief, yet the foundation was left to cling to, and every renewal added somewhat to its strength.

Let no one who hasn't experienced such hardship pass judgment here. Let's not entertain thoughts about what she should have done or what they might have done. God's love is immense, and a Christian's faith is unwavering, but when have the first encounters between past joys and new sorrows been anything but intense? Occasionally, brief moments of peace may grace the sufferer, wonderful and soothing, and even a faint glimpse of future tranquility may be seen in the distance; but suddenly, a challenge is thrown down again—no matter what it is—an old glance, an old word, rushing unexpectedly to the soul, and haunting feelings resurface only to unleash their own fury. It often feels as if sorrow has its own nature, separate from whatever it affects, and sometimes strangely contradictory to it—burning the gentle, softening the passionate, elevating the weak, and bringing down the strong—revealing the true nature, habits, or principles of the mind only in the defenses it builds up during moments of relief. With Mrs. H——, these defenses were built on a solid foundation, and even though the storm would crash against her walls and inundate everything with the raging waters of grief, the foundation remained to hold on to, and each renewal added to its strength.

Three days were spent thus, but the fourth she was better, and on Miss Campbell's approaching her bed-side, she drew her to her, and, putting her arms round her neck, imprinted a calm and solemn kiss upon her cheek.

Three days went by like this, but on the fourth day she felt better. When Miss Campbell came to her bedside, she pulled her close and wrapped her arms around her neck, placing a calm and serious kiss on her cheek.

"Oh! what can I ever do for you, dear friend and comforter? God, who has sent you to me in my utmost need, He alone can reward you. I don't even know your name; but that matters not, I know your heart. Now, you may tell me all—all; before, I felt as if I could neither know nor forget what had happened, before, it was as if God had withdrawn His countenance; but now He is gracious, He has heard your prayers."

“Oh! What can I ever do for you, dear friend and comforter? God, who has sent you to me in my greatest need, He alone can reward you. I don’t even know your name; but that doesn’t matter, I know your heart. Now, you can tell me everything—everything; before, I felt like I could neither know nor forget what had happened. It was as if God had turned away from me; but now He is kind, He has heard your prayers.”

And then, with the avidity of fresh, hungry sorrow, she besought Miss Campbell to tell her all she knew; she besought and would not be denied, for sorrow has royal authority, its requests are commands. So, with the hand of each locked together, and the eyes of each averted, they sat questioning and answering in disjointed sentences till the whole sad tale was told. Then, anxious to turn a subject which could not be banished, Miss Campbell spoke of the many hearts that had bled, and the many prayers that had ascended[Pg 91] for her, and told her of that kind old man who had thought, acted, and grieved for her like a father.

And then, filled with the eagerness of fresh, aching grief, she urged Miss Campbell to share everything she knew; she pleaded and wouldn’t take no for an answer, because grief has a kind of authority—its requests feel like commands. So, with their hands clasped together and their eyes turned away, they sat, asking and answering in fragmented sentences until the whole sorrowful story was shared. Then, wanting to shift the conversation from a topic they couldn't escape, Miss Campbell talked about the many hearts that had hurt and the numerous prayers that had been offered[Pg 91] for her, and she mentioned the kind old man who had cared, acted, and mourned for her like a father.

"God bless him—God bless them all; but chiefly you, my sister. I want no other name."

"God bless him—God bless them all; but mainly you, my sister. I want no other name."

"Call me Catherine," said the faithful companion.

"Just call me Catherine," said the loyal companion.

Passionate bursts of grief would succeed such conversations; nevertheless, they were renewed again and again, for, like all sufferers from severe bereavements, her heart needed to create a world for itself, where its loved ones still were, as a defense against that outer one where they were not, and to which she was only slowly and painfully to be inured, if ever. In these times she would love to tell Catherine—what Catherine most loved to hear—how that her lost husband was both a believer and a doer of Christ's holy word, and that her lost child had learned at her knee what she herself had chiefly learned from his father. For she had been brought up in ignorance and indifference to religious truths, and the greatest happiness of her life had commenced that knowledge, which its greatest sorrow was now to complete.

Passionate bursts of grief followed these conversations; still, they happened over and over again because, like anyone who has experienced deep loss, her heart needed to create a world where her loved ones still existed, as a way to protect herself from the reality where they did not and to which she was only slowly and painfully adapting, if ever. During these moments, she loved to tell Catherine—what Catherine loved to hear most—how her lost husband was both a believer and a doer of Christ's teachings, and that her lost child had learned at her side what she had mainly learned from his father. She had been raised without knowledge or care for religious truths, and the greatest happiness of her life had begun with this understanding, which its greatest sorrow was now going to complete.

"I have been such a happy woman," she would say, "that I have pitied others less blessed, though I trust they have not envied me." And then would follow sigh on sigh and tear on tear, and again her soul writhed beneath the agony of that implacable mental spasm.

"I've been such a happy woman," she would say, "that I've felt sorry for those who are less fortunate, though I hope they haven't envied me." And then came sigh after sigh and tear after tear, and once more her soul twisted in the pain of that relentless mental spasm.

Sometimes the mourner would appear to lose, instead of gaining ground, and would own with depression, and even with shame, her fear that she was becoming more and more the sport of ungovernable feeling. "My sorrow is sharp enough," she would say, "but it is a still sharper pang when I feel I am not doing my duty under it. It is not thus that he would have had me act." And her kind companion, always at hand to give sympathy or comfort, would bid her not exact or expect any thing from herself, but to cast all upon God, reminding her in words of tenderness that her soul was as a sick child, and that strength would not be required until strength was vouchsafed. "Strength," said the mourner, "no more strength or health for me." And Miss Campbell would whisper that, though "weariness endureth for a night, joy comes in the morning." Or she would be silent, for she knew, as most women do, alike how to soothe and when to humor.

Sometimes the mourner seemed to lose ground instead of gaining it, admitting with sadness and even shame her fear that she was becoming more and more overwhelmed by uncontrollable emotions. "My sorrow is sharp enough," she would say, "but it hurts even more when I feel like I'm not fulfilling my responsibilities in the midst of it. This isn't how he would have wanted me to act." Her compassionate friend, always there to offer sympathy or comfort, would encourage her not to demand anything from herself but to surrender everything to God, gently reminding her that her soul was like a sick child, and that she wouldn’t need strength until it was given to her. "Strength," the mourner replied, "there's no more strength or health for me." And Miss Campbell would quietly remind her that, even though "weeping may last for a night, joy comes in the morning." Or she would stay silent, knowing, as most women do, how to comfort and when to listen.

It was a beautiful and a moving sight to see two beings thus riveted together in the exercise and receipt of the tenderest and most intimate feelings, who had never known of each other's existence till the moment that made the one dependent and the other indispensable. All the shades and grades of conventional and natural acquaintanceship, all the gradual insight into mutual character, and the gradual growth into mutual trust, which it is so sweet to look back upon from the high ground of friendship, were lost to them; but it mattered not, here they were together, the one admitted into the sanctuary of sorrow, the other sharing in the fullness of love, with no reminiscence in common but one, and that sufficient to bind them together for life.

It was a beautiful and moving sight to see two people deeply connected, experiencing the most tender and intimate feelings, who had never known about each other's existence until the moment that made one dependent on the other and the other essential. All the shades and levels of casual and deep acquaintance, all the gradual understanding of each other's character, and the slow buildup of mutual trust, which are so lovely to look back on from the perspective of friendship, were lost to them; but it didn’t matter, here they were together, one invited into the space of sorrow, the other sharing in the fullness of love, with no shared memories except one, which was enough to bond them for life.

Meanwhile the friend without was also unremitting[Pg 92] in his way. He crossed not her threshold in person, nor would have done so for the world, but his thoughts were always reaching Mrs. H—— in some kind form. Every delicate dainty that money could procure—beautiful fruits and flowers which had scarce entered this valley before—every thing that could tempt the languid appetite or divert the weary eye was in turn thought of, and each handed in with a kind, hearty inquiry, till the mourner listened with pleasure for the step and voice. Nor was Miss Campbell forgotten; all the brief snatches of air and exercise she enjoyed were in his company, and often did he insist on her coming out for a short walk or drive when the persuasions of Mrs. H—— had failed to induce her to leave a room where she was the only joy. But now a fresh object attracted Sir Thomas's activity, for after many days the earthly remains of one of the sufferers were thrown up. It was the body of the little boy. Sir Thomas directed all that was necessary to be done, and having informed Miss Campbell, the two friends, each strange to the other, and bound together by the interest in one equally strange to both, went out together up the hill above the hotel, and were gone longer than usual. The next day the intelligence was communicated to Mrs. H——, who received it calmly, but added, "I could have wished them both to have rested together; but God's will be done. I ought not to think of them as on earth."

Meanwhile, the friend outside was also persistent[Pg 92] in his own way. He didn’t visit her in person, nor would he have done so for anything, but his thoughts were always reaching Mrs. H—— in some form. Every delicate treat that money could buy—beautiful fruits and flowers that had scarcely entered this valley before—everything that could entice the weak appetite or capture the tired eye was thoughtfully considered, and each item was delivered with a kind, warm inquiry, until the mourner began to look forward to the sound of his footsteps and voice. Miss Campbell was not forgotten either; all the brief moments of fresh air and light exercise she enjoyed were with him, and he often insisted that she go out for a short walk or drive when Mrs. H——'s encouragement had failed to get her to leave the room where she found her only joy. But now a new focus directed Sir Thomas’s attention, for after many days, the earthly remains of one of the victims were discovered. It was the body of the little boy. Sir Thomas arranged everything that needed to be done, and after informing Miss Campbell, the two friends, each unfamiliar with the other but connected by their interest in someone equally unknown to both, went out together up the hill above the hotel and were gone longer than usual. The next day, the news was shared with Mrs. H——, who received it calmly but added, "I would have preferred them both to rest together; but God's will be done. I shouldn't think of them as still on earth."

The grave of little Harry H—— was dug far from the burial-ground of his fathers, and strangers followed him to it; but though there were no familiar faces among those who stood round, there were no cold ones; and when Sir Thomas, as chief mourner, threw the earth upon the lowered coffin, warm tears fell upon it also. Miss Campbell had watched the procession from the window, and told how the good old man walked next behind the minister, the boatman and his wife following him, and how a long train succeeded, all pious and reverential in their bearing, with that air of manly decorum which the Scotch peasantry conspicuously show on such occasions. And she who lay on a bed of sorrow and weakness blessed them through her tears, and felt that her child's funeral was not lonely.

The grave of little Harry H—— was dug far from his family's burial ground, and strangers followed him there; even though there were no familiar faces in the crowd, there weren't any cold ones either. When Sir Thomas, as the chief mourner, threw earth onto the lowered coffin, warm tears fell on it too. Miss Campbell watched the procession from the window and described how the good old man walked just behind the minister, with the boatman and his wife following him, and a long line of people after that, all showing a respectful and reverent demeanor, with that strong sense of dignity that the Scottish peasantry is known for on such occasions. And she, lying on a bed of grief and weakness, blessed them through her tears, feeling that her child's funeral was not lonely.

From this time the mourner visibly mended. The funeral and the intelligence that preceded it had insensibly given her that change of the same theme, the want of which had been so much felt at first. She had now taken up her burden, and, for the dear sakes of those for whom she bore it, it became almost sweet to her. She was not worshiping her sorrow as an idol, but cherishing it as a friend. Meanwhile she had received many kind visits from the minister who had buried her child, and had listened to his exhortations with humility and gratitude; but his words were felt as admonitions, Catherine's as comfort. To her, now dearer and dearer, every day she would confess aloud the secret changes of her heart; how at one time the world looked all black and dreary before her, how at another she seemed already to live in a brighter one beyond; how one day life was a burden she knew not how to bear, and[Pg 93] another how the bitterness of death seemed already past. Then with true Christian politeness she would lament over the selfishness of her grief, and ask where Miss Campbell had learned to know that feeling which she felt henceforth was to be the only solace of her life—viz., the deep, deep sympathy for others. And Catherine would tell her, with that care-worn look which confirmed all she said, how she had been sorely tried, not by the death of those she loved, but by what was worse—their sufferings and their sins. How she had been laden with those misfortunes which wound most and teach least, and which, although coming equally from the hand of God, torment you with the idea that, but for the wickedness or weakness of some human agent, they need never have been; till she had felt, wrongly no doubt, that she could have better borne those on which the stamp of the Divine Will was more legibly impressed. She told her how the sting of sorrow, like that of death, is sin; how comparatively light it was to see those you love dead, dying, crippled, maniacs, victims, in short, of any evil, rather than victims of evil itself. She spoke of a heart-broken sister and a hard-hearted brother; of a son—an only one, like him just buried—who had gone on from sin to sin, hardening his own heart, and wringing those of others, till none but a mother's love remained to him, and that he outraged. She told, in short, so much of the sad realities of life, in which, if there was not more woe, there was less comfort, that Mrs. H—— acknowledged in her heart that such griefs had indeed been unendurable, and returned with something like comfort to the undisturbed sanctity of her own.

From this point on, the mourner visibly improved. The funeral and the news that came before it had subtly brought her the change she had missed so much at the beginning. She had now picked up her burden, and for the sake of those she carried it for, it started to feel almost sweet to her. She wasn't worshiping her sorrow as a god, but embracing it as a friend. In the meantime, she had received many kind visits from the minister who had officiated her child's burial, and she listened to his advice with humility and gratitude; but his words felt like reminders, while Catherine's felt comforting. To her, who became dearer every day, she would openly confess the hidden changes in her heart; how at one moment, the world seemed completely dark and bleak to her, and at another, she felt she was already living in a brighter place beyond; how one day life was a weight she didn’t know how to carry, and on another, the bitterness of death felt already behind her. Then, with genuine Christian politeness, she would mourn the selfishness of her grief, and ask where Miss Campbell had learned to understand the feeling that she now recognized would be the only comfort in her life—namely, the deep, deep empathy for others. And Catherine would tell her, with that worn look that confirmed everything she said, how she had been deeply tested, not by the death of loved ones, but by something worse—their suffering and their sins. How she had been burdened with misfortunes that hurt the most and taught the least, and which, even though they came equally from the hand of God, tormented her with the thought that, if not for the wickedness or weakness of some human being, they might never have happened; until she felt, perhaps wrongly, that she could have better faced those trials that bore the clearer mark of Divine Will. She told her how the sting of sorrow, like that of death, is caused by sin; how much lighter it was to see those you love dead, dying, disabled, insane—victims of any evil—rather than victims of evil itself. She spoke of a heartbroken sister and a cold-hearted brother; of a son—an only child, like the one just buried—who had moved from sin to sin, hardening his heart and hurting others' hearts, until only a mother’s love remained for him, and even that he disrespected. In short, she shared so much about the harsh realities of life, where, if there wasn't more sorrow, there was less comfort, that Mrs. H—— silently acknowledged that such griefs had indeed been unbearable, and returned with something like comfort to the untouched peace of her own life.

About this time a summons came which required Sir Thomas to quit the valley in which these scenes had been occurring. Mrs. H—— could have seen him, and almost longed to see him; but he shrunk from her, fearing no longer her sorrow so much as her gratitude.

About this time, a summons arrived that required Sir Thomas to leave the valley where these events had been happening. Mrs. H—— could have met him and almost wished to see him; but he pulled away from her, fearing not her sadness so much as her gratitude.

"Tell her I love her," he said, in his abrupt way, "and always shall; but I can't see her—at least, not yet." Then, explaining to Miss Campbell all the little arrangements for the continuation of the mourner's comfort, which his absence might interrupt, he authorized her to dispose of his servants, his horses, and every thing that belonged to him, and finally put into her hands a small packet, directed to Mrs. H——, with instructions when to give it. He had ascertained that Mrs. H—— was wealthy, and that her great afflictions entailed no minor privations. "But you, my dear, are poor; at least, I hope so, for I could not be happy unless I were of service to you. I am just as much obliged to you as Mrs. H—— is. Mind, you have promised to write to me and to apply to me without reserve. No kindness, no honor—nonsense. It is I who honor you above every creature I know, but I would not be a woman for the world; at least, the truth is, I could not." And so he turned hastily away.

"Tell her I love her," he said abruptly, "and I always will; but I can't see her—at least, not yet." Then, explaining to Miss Campbell all the little arrangements for the mourner's comfort that his absence might disrupt, he gave her the authority to handle his servants, his horses, and everything else he owned. Finally, he handed her a small packet directed to Mrs. H——, with instructions on when to give it to her. He had confirmed that Mrs. H—— was wealthy and that her significant losses had not come without their own hardships. "But you, my dear, are not well off; at least, I hope so, because I couldn't be happy unless I could help you. I’m just as grateful to you as Mrs. H—— is. Remember, you promised to write to me and to reach out to me without hesitation. No kindness, no honor—it's ridiculous. It’s I who honor you more than anyone else I know, but I wouldn’t want to be a woman for the world; to be honest, I couldn't." And so he turned away quickly.

And now the time approached when she, who had entered this valley a happy wife and mother, was to leave it widowed and childless, a sorrowing and heavy-hearted woman, but not an unhappy[Pg 94] one. She had but few near relations, and those scattered in distant lands; but there were friends who would break the first desolation of her former home, and Catherine had promised to bear her company till she had committed her into their hands.

And now the time was approaching when she, who had come into this valley as a happy wife and mother, was about to leave it as a widowed, childless woman, filled with sorrow and a heavy heart, but not without hope[Pg 94]. She had only a few close relatives, and they were spread out in distant places; however, there were friends who would help ease the initial emptiness of her old home, and Catherine had promised to stay with her until she had handed her over to them.

It was a lovely evening, the one before their departure. Mrs. H—— was clad for the first time in all that betokened her to be a mourner; but, as Catherine looked from the black habiliments to that pale face, she felt that there was the deepest mourning of all. Slowly the widow passed through that side-door we have mentioned, and stood once more under God's heaven. Neither had mentioned to the other the errand on which they were bound, but both felt that there was but one. Slowly and feebly she mounted the gentle slope, and often she stopped, for it was more than weakness or fatigue that made her breath fail. The way was beautiful, close to the rocky bed and leafy sides of that sweetest of all sweet things in the natural world, a Scotch burn. And now they turned, for the rich strip of grass, winding among bush and rock, which they had been following as a path, here spread itself out in a level shelf of turf, where the burn ran smoother, the bushes grew higher, and where the hill started upward again in bolder lines. Here there was a fresh-covered grave. The widow knelt by it, while Catherine stood back. Long was that head bowed, first in anguish, and then in submission, and then she turned her face toward the lake, on which she had not looked since that fatal day, and gazed steadily upon it. The child lay in his narrow bed at her feet, but the father had a wider one far beneath. Catherine now approached and was folded in a silent embrace; then she gave her that small packet which Sir Thomas had left, and begged her to open it on the spot. It was a legal deed, making over to Mary H——, in free gift, the ground on which she stood—a broad strip from the tip of the hill to the waters of the lake. The widow's tears rained fast upon it.

It was a lovely evening, the night before their departure. Mrs. H—— was dressed for the first time in a way that signified she was in mourning; however, as Catherine looked from her black attire to that pale face, she sensed that there was a deeper mourning present. Slowly, the widow walked through the side door we mentioned earlier and stood again beneath the sky. Neither of them had explicitly discussed the reason for their outing, but they both felt there was only one reason. She ascended the gentle slope slowly and weakly, often pausing, for it was more than just weakness or fatigue that made her breath unsteady. The path was beautiful, nestled close to the rocky streambed and the leafy banks of one of nature's sweetest creations, a Scottish burn. They made their way until the rich strip of grass they had been following as a path spread out into a flat patch of turf, where the stream flowed more gently, the bushes grew taller, and the hill climbed steeply again. Here, there was a freshly covered grave. The widow knelt beside it while Catherine stood back. Her head remained bowed for a long time, first in anguish, then in acceptance, before she turned her gaze toward the lake, which she hadn’t looked at since that tragic day, and stared intently at it. The child rested in his narrow bed at her feet, while the father lay in a much larger one far below. Catherine then approached and embraced her silently; she handed her the small package that Sir Thomas had left and urged her to open it right there. It was a legal deed, gifting Mary H—— the land she stood on—a broad strip from the top of the hill down to the lake's edge. Tears streamed down the widow's face onto it.

"Both God and man are very good to me," she said; "I am lonely but not forsaken. But, Catherine, it is you to whom I must speak. I have tried to speak before, but never felt I could till now. Oh, Catherine! stay with me; let us never be parted. God gave you to me when He took all else beside; He has not done it for naught. I can bear to return to my lonely home if you will share it—I can bear to see this valley, this grave again, if you are with me. I am not afraid of tying your cheerfulness to my sorrow; I feel that I am under a calamity, but I feel also that I am under no curse—you will help to make it a blessing. Oh! complete your sacred work, give me years to requite to you your last few days to me. You have none who need you more—none who love you more. Oh! follow me; here, on my child's grave, I humbly entreat you, follow me."

"Both God and man have been very kind to me," she said; "I feel lonely but not abandoned. But, Catherine, it's you I need to talk to. I've tried to speak before but never felt ready until now. Oh, Catherine! please stay with me; let’s never be separated. God gave you to me when He took everything else away; He didn’t do it for no reason. I can handle going back to my lonely home if you’ll share it with me—I can endure seeing this valley, this grave again, if you’re with me. I'm not worried about bringing your happiness into my sadness; I know I'm facing a hardship, but I also know it's not a curse—you'll help turn it into a blessing. Oh! complete your sacred mission, give me years to repay you for these last few days. You have no one who needs you more—no one who loves you more. Oh! please follow me; here, at my child's grave, I humbly ask you, follow me."

Catherine trembled; she stood silent a minute, and then, with a low, firm voice, replied, "Here, on your child's grave, I promise you. Your people shall be my people, and your God my God." She kept her promise and never repented it.

Catherine shook with emotion; she paused for a moment in silence, then replied in a soft yet steady voice, "Here, at your child's grave, I promise you. Your people will be my people, and your God will be my God." She kept her promise and never regretted it.


LIFE OF BLAKE, THE GREAT ADMIRAL.

Robert Blake was born at Bridgewater, in August, 1599. His father, Humphrey Blake, was a merchant trading with Spain—a man whose temper seems to have been too sanguine and adventurous for the ordinary action of trade, finally involving him in difficulties which clouded his latter days, and left his family in straitened circumstances: his name, however, was held in general respect; and we find that he lived in one of the best houses in Bridgewater, and twice filled the chair of its chief magistrate. The perils to which mercantile enterprise was then liable—the chance escapes and valorous deeds which the successful adventurer had to tell his friends and children on the dark winter nights—doubtless formed a part of the food on which the imagination of young Blake, "silent and thoughtful from his childhood," was fed in the "old house at home." At the Bridgewater grammar-school, Robert received his early education, making tolerable acquaintance with Latin and Greek, and acquiring a strong bias toward a literary life. This penchant was confirmed by his subsequent career at Oxford, where he matriculated at sixteen, and where he strove hard, but fruitlessly, for scholarships and fellowships at different colleges. His failure to obtain a Merton fellowship has been attributed to a crotchet of the warden's, Sir Henry Savile, in favor of tall men: "The young Somersetshire student, thick-set, fair-complexioned, and only five feet six, fell below his standard of manly beauty;" and thus the Cavalier warden, in denying this aspirant the means of cultivating literature on a little university oatmeal, was turning back on the world one who was fated to become a republican power of the age. This shining light, instead of comfortably and obscurely merging in a petty constellation of Alma Mater, was to become a bright particular star, and dwell apart. The avowed liberalism of Robert may, however, have done more in reality to shock Sir Henry, than his inability to add a cubit to his stature. It is pleasant to know, that the "admiral and general at sea" never outgrew a tenderness for literature—his first-love, despite the rebuff of his advances. Even in the busiest turmoil of a life teeming with accidents by flood and field, he made it a point of pride not to forget his favorite classics. Nor was it till after nine years' experience of college-life, and when his father was no longer able to manage his res angusta vitæ, that Robert finally abandoned his long-cherished plans, and retired with a sigh and last adieu from the banks of the Isis.

Robert Blake was born in Bridgewater in August 1599. His father, Humphrey Blake, was a merchant trading with Spain—a man whose temperament was likely too optimistic and adventurous for the regular business, ultimately leading him into troubles that overshadowed his later years and left his family in difficult financial circumstances. However, his name was generally respected; he lived in one of the best houses in Bridgewater and served twice as its chief magistrate. The risks associated with mercantile ventures at that time—the narrow escapes and brave stories that successful adventurers shared during dark winter nights—surely fed the imagination of young Blake, who was "silent and thoughtful from his childhood," in the "old house at home." At the Bridgewater grammar school, Robert received his early education, gaining a decent understanding of Latin and Greek and developing a strong inclination toward a literary life. This passion was reinforced during his time at Oxford, where he enrolled at sixteen and worked hard, but unsuccessfully, for scholarships and fellowships at various colleges. His failure to secure a Merton fellowship was attributed to a quirk of the warden, Sir Henry Savile, who preferred tall men: "The young Somersetshire student, stocky, fair-skinned, and only five feet six, didn't meet his standard of masculine beauty;" thus, the Cavalier warden, by denying this hopeful student the means to pursue literature on a modest university budget, was turning away someone destined to become a significant republican force of his time. Instead of blending into a minor role at the university, this promising talent was meant to shine brightly and stand out. Robert's outspoken liberalism may have shocked Sir Henry more than his height ever could. It's heartening to know that the "admiral and general at sea" never lost his love for literature—his first passion, despite being rebuffed in his pursuits. Even amidst the chaos of a life full of challenges at sea and on land, he took pride in keeping in touch with his favorite classics. It wasn't until after nine years of college life, when his father could no longer manage his financial struggles, that Robert finally gave up his long-held dreams and bid farewell with a sigh to the banks of the Isis.

When he returned to Bridgewater, in time to close his father's eyes, and superintend the arrangements of the family, he was already remarkable for that "iron will, that grave demeanor, that free and dauntless spirit," which so distinguished his after-course. His tastes were simple, his manners somewhat bluntly austere; a refined dignity of countenance, and a picturesque vigor of conversation, invested him with a social interest, to which his indignant invectives against[Pg 96] court corruptions gave distinctive character. To the Short Parliament he was sent as member for his native town; and in 1645, was returned by Taunton to the Long Parliament. At the dissolution of the former, which he regarded as a signal for action, he began to prepare arms against the king; his being one of the first troops in the field, and engaged in almost every action of importance in the western counties. His superiority to the men about him lay in the "marvelous fertility, energy, and comprehensiveness of his military genius." Prince Rupert alone, in the Royalist camp, could rival him as a "partisan soldier." His first distinguished exploit was his defense of Prior's Hill fort, at the siege of Bristol—which contrasts so remarkably with the pusillanimity of his chief, Colonel Fiennes. Next comes his yet more brilliant defense of Lyme—then a little fishing-town, with some 900 inhabitants, of which the defenses were a dry ditch, a few hastily-formed earth-works, and three small batteries, but which the Cavalier host of Prince Maurice, trying storm, stratagem, blockade, day after day, and week after week, failed to reduce or dishearten. "At Oxford, where Charles then was, the affair was an inexplicable marvel and mystery: every hour the court expected to hear that the 'little vile fishing-town,' as Clarendon contemptuously calls it, had fallen, and that Maurice had marched away to enterprises of greater moment; but every post brought word to the wondering council, that Colonel Blake still held out, and that his spirited defense was rousing and rallying the dispersed adherents of Parliament in those parts." After the siege was raised, the Royalists found that more men of gentle blood had fallen under Blake's fire at Lyme, than in all other sieges and skirmishes in the western counties since the opening of the war.

When he returned to Bridgewater, just in time to close his father's eyes and oversee the family's arrangements, he was already known for that "iron will, grave demeanor, and free and fearless spirit," which defined his later actions. His tastes were simple, and his manners were somewhat blunt and serious; a refined dignity in his expression and a lively engagement in conversation made him socially interesting, particularly due to his passionate criticisms of [Pg 96] court corruption. He was sent as a representative for his hometown to the Short Parliament, and in 1645, he was elected by Taunton to the Long Parliament. When the former dissolved, which he saw as a clear call to action, he began gathering arms against the king; he was among the first troops deployed and took part in nearly every significant battle in the western counties. His advantage over those around him was in the "remarkable creativity, energy, and breadth of his military genius." Only Prince Rupert, in the Royalist camp, could match him as a "partisan soldier." His first notable achievement was defending Prior’s Hill fort during the siege of Bristol, which sharply contrasted with the cowardice of his leader, Colonel Fiennes. Next came his even more impressive defense of Lyme, a small fishing town with about 900 residents, which had only a dry ditch, a few hastily built earthen defenses, and three small batteries. Despite repeated assaults, strategies, and blockades from Prince Maurice’s Cavalier forces, they couldn't conquer or intimidate it. "At Oxford, where Charles was at the time, the situation was an inexplicable wonder and mystery: with each hour, the court expected to hear that the 'little vile fishing-town,' as Clarendon scornfully called it, had fallen, and that Maurice would move on to more significant ventures; but each courier brought news to the astonished council that Colonel Blake was still holding strong, and his spirited defense was inspiring and uniting the Parliament's dispersed supporters in that region." After the siege was lifted, the Royalists discovered that more noble soldiers had been killed by Blake's forces at Lyme than in all other sieges and skirmishes in the western counties since the war began.

The hero's fame had become a spell in the west: it was seen that he rivaled Rupert in rapid and brilliant execution, and excelled him in the caution and sagacity of his plans. He took Taunton—a place so important at that juncture, as standing on and controlling the great western highway—in July, 1644, within a week of Cromwell's defeat of Rupert at Marston Moor. All the vigor of the Royalists was brought to bear on the captured town; Blake's defense of which is justly characterized as abounding with deeds of individual heroism—exhibiting in its master-mind a rare combination of civil and military genius. The spectacle of an unwalled town, in an inland district, with no single advantage of site, surrounded by powerful castles and garrisons, and invested by an enemy brave, watchful, numerous, and well provided with artillery, successively resisting storm, strait, and blockade for several months, thus paralyzing the king's power, and affording Cromwell time to remodel the army, naturally arrested the attention of military writers at that time; and French authors of this class bestowed on Taunton the name of the modern Saguntum. The rage of the Royalists at this prolonged resistance was extreme. Reckoning from the date when Blake first seized the town, to that of[Pg 97] Goring's final retreat, the defense lasted exactly a year, and under circumstances of almost overwhelming difficulty to the besieged party, who, in addition to the fatigue of nightly watches, and the destruction of daily conflicts, suffered from terrible scarcity of provisions. "Not a day passed without a fire; sometimes eight or ten houses were burning at the same moment; and in the midst of all the fear, horror, and confusion incident to such disasters, Blake and his little garrison had to meet the storming-parties of an enemy brave, exasperated, and ten times their own strength. But every inch of ground was gallantly defended. A broad belt of ruined cottages and gardens was gradually formed between the besiegers and the besieged; and on the heaps of broken walls and burnt rafters, the obstinate contest was renewed from day to day." At last relief arrived from London; and Goring, in savage dudgeon, beat a retreat, notwithstanding the wild oath he had registered, either to reduce that haughty town, or to lay his bones in its trenches.

The hero's fame had become a legend in the west: it was clear that he rivaled Rupert in quick and impressive actions and surpassed him in the careful planning and insight of his strategies. He took Taunton—an area that was crucial at that time for controlling the major western highway—in July 1644, just a week after Cromwell defeated Rupert at Marston Moor. All the energy of the Royalists was focused on the captured town; Blake's defense there is rightly recognized for its many acts of individual heroism, showcasing a unique blend of civil and military brilliance. The sight of an unwalled town in a rural area, with no real strategic advantage, surrounded by strong castles and garrisons, and besieged by a brave, watchful, numerous enemy well-equipped with artillery, managing to resist attacks, sieges, and blockades for several months, effectively crippling the king's power and giving Cromwell time to reorganize the army, naturally caught the interest of military writers at the time; French authors referred to Taunton as the modern Saguntum. The Royalists were extremely frustrated by this extended resistance. Counting from the moment Blake first took the town to Goring's final retreat, the defense lasted exactly a year, under almost overwhelming challenges for the besieged, who, in addition to the exhaustion from nightly watches and the devastation from daily battles, faced a severe shortage of supplies. "Not a day went by without a fire; sometimes eight or ten houses burned simultaneously; and amidst all the fear, horror, and chaos of such disasters, Blake and his small garrison had to confront the attacking parties of a brave enemy, enraged and ten times their own numbers. But every inch of ground was fiercely defended. A wide stretch of ruined cottages and gardens slowly formed between the besiegers and the besieged; and on the piles of crumbled walls and burned beams, the stubborn fight continued day after day." Finally, relief arrived from London; and Goring, in furious frustration, retreated, regardless of the wild vow he had taken, either to conquer that proud town or to die in its trenches.

Blake was now the observed of all observers; but, unlike most of his compeers, he abstained from using his advantages for purposes of selfish or personal aggrandizement. He kept aloof from the "centre of intrigues," and remained at his post, "doing his duty humbly and faithfully at a distance from Westminster; while other men, with less than half his claims, were asking and obtaining the highest honors and rewards from a grateful and lavish country." Nor, indeed, did he at any time side with the ultras of his party, but loudly disapproved of the policy of the regicides. This, coupled with his influence, so greatly deserved and so deservedly great, made him an object of jealousy with Cromwell and his party; and it was owing, perhaps, to their anxiety to keep him removed from the home sphere of action, that he was now appointed to the chief naval command.

Blake was now the focus of everyone’s attention; but, unlike most of his peers, he didn’t use his advantages for selfish gain. He stayed away from the "center of intrigues" and continued to do his duty humbly and faithfully, far from Westminster, while others with far less merit were asking for and receiving the highest honors and rewards from a grateful and generous country. He also never sided with the extreme members of his party and openly opposed the regicides’ policies. This, combined with his well-earned influence, made him an object of jealousy for Cromwell and his group; it was probably their concern to keep him away from the main area of action that led to his appointment to the top naval command.

Hitherto, and for years afterward, no state, ancient or modern, as Macaulay points out, had made a separation between the military and the naval service. Cimon and Lysander, Pompey and Agrippa, had fought by sea as well as by land: at Flodden, the right wing of the English was led by her admiral, and the French admiral led the Huguenots at Jarnac, &c. Accordingly, Blake was summoned from his pacific government at Taunton, to assume the post of "General and Admiral at Sea;" a title afterward changed to "General of the Fleet." Two others were associated with him in the command; but Blake seems at least to have been recognized as primus inter pares. The navy system was in deplorable need of reform; and a reformer it found in Robert Blake, from the very day he became an admiral. His care for the well-being of his men made him an object of their almost adoring attachment. From first to last, he stood alone as England's model seaman. "Envy, hatred, and jealousy dogged the steps of every other officer in the fleet; but of him, both then and afterward, every man spoke well." The "tremendous powers" intrusted to him by the Council of State, he exercised with off-handed[Pg 98] and masterly success—startling politicians and officials of the ancien régime, by his bold and open tactics, and his contempt for tortuous by-paths in diplomacy. His wondrous exploits were performed with extreme poverty of means. He was the first to repudiate and disprove the supposed fundamental maxim in marine warfare, that no ship could attack a castle, or other strong fortification, with any hope of success. The early part of his naval career was occupied in opposing and defeating the piratical performances of Prince Rupert, which then constituted the support of the exiled Stuarts. Blake's utmost vigilance and activity were required to put down this extraordinary system of freebooting; and by the time that he had successively overcome Rupert, and the minor but stubborn adventurers, Grenville and Carteret, he was in request to conduct the formidable war with Holland, and to cope with such veterans as Tromp, De Witt, De Ruyter, &c.

Until now, and for years afterward, no state, ancient or modern, as Macaulay points out, had separated the military and naval services. Cimon and Lysander, Pompey and Agrippa, fought at sea as well as on land: at Flodden, the English right wing was led by their admiral, and the French admiral led the Huguenots at Jarnac, etc. Consequently, Blake was called from his peaceful role in Taunton to take the position of "General and Admiral at Sea," a title later changed to "General of the Fleet." Two others were teamed up with him in leadership; but Blake seems to have been recognized at least as primus inter pares. The naval system was in dire need of reform, and a reformer was found in Robert Blake from the very day he became an admiral. His concern for his men made them almost adore him. From start to finish, he stood out as England's model sailor. "Envy, hatred, and jealousy followed every other officer in the fleet; but of him, both then and later, every man spoke highly." The "tremendous powers" entrusted to him by the Council of State were wielded with unpretentious mastery—shocking politicians and officials of the ancien régime with his bold and straightforward tactics and his disregard for twisted paths in diplomacy. His remarkable feats were accomplished with very limited resources. He was the first to reject and prove wrong the supposed basic rule in naval warfare that no ship could successfully attack a castle or other stronghold. The early part of his naval career was spent opposing and defeating the pirate activities of Prince Rupert, which then supported the exiled Stuarts. Blake's utmost vigilance and energy were needed to combat this unusual system of piracy; and by the time he had successively overcome Rupert, along with the smaller but tenacious adventurers Grenville and Carteret, he was sought after to lead the significant war with Holland and face veterans like Tromp, De Witt, and De Ruyter.

On one occasion only did Blake suffer ever a defeat; and this one is easily explained by—first, Tromp's overwhelming superiority of force; secondly, the extreme deficiency of men in the English fleet; and, thirdly, the cowardice or disaffection of several of Blake's captains at a critical moment in the battle. Notwithstanding this disaster, not a whisper was heard against the admiral either in the Council of State or in the city; his offer to resign was flatteringly rejected; and he soon found, that the "misfortune which might have ruined another man, had given him strength and influence in the country." This disaster, in fact, gave him power to effect reforms in the service, and to root out abuses which had defied all his efforts in the day of his success. He followed it up by the great battle of Portland, and other triumphant engagements.

On only one occasion did Blake ever face defeat; this is easily explained by—first, Tromp's overwhelming force; second, the severe shortage of men in the English fleet; and third, the cowardice or lack of loyalty from several of Blake's captains at a critical moment during the battle. Despite this setback, no one spoke against the admiral in the Council of State or in the city; his offer to resign was flatteringly rejected; and he soon realized that the "misfortune that could have destroyed another man had actually given him strength and influence in the country." This setback enabled him to implement reforms in the service and eliminate problems that had defied all his efforts during his time of success. He followed it with the great battle of Portland and other victorious engagements.

Then came his sweeping tours de force in the Mediterranean; in six months he established himself as a power in that great midland sea, from which his countrymen had been politically excluded since the age of the Crusades—teaching nations, to which England's very name was a strange sound, to respect its honors and its rights; chastising the pirates of Barbary with unprecedented severity; making Italy's petty princes feel the power of the northern Protestants; causing the pope himself to tremble on his seven hills; and startling the council-chambers of Venice and Constantinople with the distant echoes of our guns. And be it remembered, that England had then no Malta, Corfu, and Gibraltar as the bases of naval operations in the Mediterranean: on the contrary, Blake found that in almost every gulf and island of that sea—in Malta, Venice, Genoa, Leghorn, Algiers, Tunis, and Marseilles—there existed a rival and an enemy; nor were there more than three or four harbors in which he could obtain even bread for love or money.

Then came his impressive achievements in the Mediterranean; in six months he established himself as a power in that great inland sea, from which his countrymen had been politically excluded since the age of the Crusades—teaching nations, to which England's name was almost unrecognizable, to respect its honors and rights; punishing the Barbary pirates with unprecedented severity; making Italy's small princes feel the strength of the northern Protestants; causing the pope himself to worry on his seven hills; and surprising the councils of Venice and Constantinople with the distant sound of our cannons. And let it be noted, that England did not have Malta, Corfu, and Gibraltar as bases for naval operations in the Mediterranean at that time: in fact, Blake found that in almost every gulf and island of that sea—in Malta, Venice, Genoa, Leghorn, Algiers, Tunis, and Marseilles—there were rivals and enemies; and there were no more than three or four harbors where he could even find bread for love or money.

After this memorable cruise, he had to conduct the Spanish war—a business quite to his mind; for though his highest renown had been gained in his conflicts with the Dutch, he had[Pg 99] secretly disliked such encounters between two Protestant states; whereas, in the case of Popish Spain, his soul leaped at the anticipation of battle—sympathizing as he did with the Puritan conviction, that Spain was the devil's stronghold in Europe. At this period, Blake was suffering from illness, and was sadly crippled in his naval equipments, having to complain constantly of the neglect at home to remedy the exigencies of the service. "Our ships," he writes, "extremely foul, winter drawing on, our victuals expiring, all stores failing, our men falling sick through the badness of drink, and eating their victuals boiled in salt water for two months' space" (1655). His own constitution was thoroughly undermined. For nearly a year, remarks his biographer, "he had never quitted the 'foul and defective' flag-ship. Want of exercise and sweet food, beer, wine, water, bread, and vegetables, had helped to develop scurvy and dropsy; and his sufferings from these diseases were now acute and continuous." But his services were indispensable, and Blake was not the man to shrink from dying in harness. His sun set gloriously at Santa Cruz—that miraculous and unparalleled action, as Clarendon calls it, which excited such grateful enthusiasm at home. At home! words of fascination to the maimed and enfeebled veteran, who now turned his thoughts so anxiously toward the green hills of his native land. Cromwell's letter of thanks, the plaudits of parliament, and the jeweled ring sent to him by his loving countrymen, reached him while homeward bound. But he was not again to tread the shores he had defended so well.

After this unforgettable cruise, he had to lead the Spanish war—a task he found quite agreeable; for although his greatest fame came from his battles with the Dutch, he secretly disliked those encounters between two Protestant nations. On the other hand, the thought of fighting against Catholic Spain excited him—he shared the Puritan belief that Spain was the devil's stronghold in Europe. At this time, Blake was struggling with illness and was sadly hindered in his naval efforts, constantly complaining about the neglect at home to address the needs of the service. "Our ships," he wrote, "are extremely unkempt, winter is approaching, our food is running out, all supplies are failing, our men are getting sick from the bad water, and they’ve been eating their rations boiled in saltwater for two months" (1655). His own health was severely compromised. For nearly a year, his biographer notes, "he had never left the 'foul and defective' flagship. Lack of exercise and nutritious food, along with beer, wine, water, bread, and vegetables, had caused scurvy and dropsy; and his suffering from these diseases was now severe and constant." But his services were necessary, and Blake was not the kind of person to shy away from dying while in service. His life ended gloriously at Santa Cruz—which Clarendon refers to as that miraculous and unparalleled action that inspired such heartfelt enthusiasm back home. Home! Such captivating words for the wounded and weakened veteran, who now anxiously thought about the green hills of his homeland. Cromwell's letter of thanks, the praise from parliament, and the jeweled ring sent to him by his devoted countrymen all reached him while he was on his way back. But he would never again walk upon the shores he had defended so valiantly.

As the ships rolled through the Bay of Biscay, his sickness increased, and affectionate adherents saw with dismay that he was drawing near to the gates of the grave. "Some gleams of the old spirit broke forth as they approached the latitude of England. He inquired often and anxiously if the white cliffs were yet in sight. He longed to behold once more the swelling downs, the free cities, the goodly churches of his native land.... At last, the Lizard was announced. Shortly afterward, the bold cliffs and bare hills of Cornwall loomed out grandly in the distance. But it was too late for the dying hero. He had sent for the captains and other great officers of his fleet, to bid them farewell; and while they were yet in his cabin, the undulating hills of Devonshire, glowing with the tints of early autumn, came full in view.... But the eyes which had so yearned to behold this scene once more were at that very instant closing in death. Foremost of the victorious squadron, the St. George rode with its precious burden into the Sound; and just as it came into full view of the eager thousands crowding the beach, the pier-heads, the walls of the citadel, &c., ready to catch the first glimpse of the hero of Santa Cruz, and salute him with a true English welcome—he, in his silent cabin, in the midst of his lion-hearted comrades, now sobbing like little children, yielded up his soul to God."

As the ships moved through the Bay of Biscay, his illness worsened, and his worried followers watched in despair as he neared the end of his life. "Some sparks of his old spirit emerged as they got closer to England. He frequently asked, with growing anxiety, if the white cliffs were visible yet. He longed to see again the rolling hills, the vibrant cities, and the beautiful churches of his homeland.... Finally, they spotted the Lizard. Shortly after that, the steep cliffs and bare hills of Cornwall appeared majestically in the distance. But it was too late for the dying hero. He had called for the captains and other senior officers of his fleet to say goodbye to them; and while they were still in his cabin, the undulating hills of Devonshire, glowing with the colors of early autumn, came into full view.... But the eyes that had so eagerly wanted to see this scene once more were, at that very moment, closing in death. Leading the victorious squadron, the St. George entered the Sound with its precious cargo; and just as it came into full view of the eager thousands gathered on the beach, at the piers, and on the citadel walls, ready to catch the first sight of the hero of Santa Cruz and greet him with a true English welcome—he, in his quiet cabin, surrounded by his brave comrades, now sobbing like small children, gave up his soul to God."

The corpse was embalmed, and conveyed to Greenwich, where it lay in state for some days.[Pg 100] On the 4th of September, 1657, the Thames bore a solemn funeral procession, which moved slowly, amid salvos of artillery, to Westminster, where a new vault had been prepared in the noble abbey. The tears of a nation made it hallowed ground. A prince, of whom the epigram declares that, if he never said a foolish thing, he never did a wise one—saw fit to disturb the hero's grave, drag out the embalmed body, and cast it into a pit in the abbey-yard. One of Charles Stuart's most witless performances! For Blake is not to be confounded—though the Merry Monarch thought otherwise—with the Iretons and Bradshaws who were similarly exhumed. The admiral was a moderate in the closest, a patriot in the widest sense.

The body was embalmed and taken to Greenwich, where it lay in state for a few days.[Pg 100] On September 4, 1657, the Thames carried a solemn funeral procession, moving slowly amidst cannon fire to Westminster, where a new vault was prepared in the grand abbey. The nation's tears made it sacred ground. A prince, who was said to have never said anything foolish but also never did anything wise, decided to disturb the hero's grave, pull out the embalmed body, and toss it into a pit in the abbey yard. One of Charles Stuart's most foolish acts! For Blake should not be confused—although the Merry Monarch thought otherwise—with the Iretons and Bradshaws who were also exhumed. The admiral was a moderate at his core and a patriot in the broadest sense.

In the chivalric disposition of the man, there was true affinity to the best qualities of the Cavalier, mingled sometimes with a certain grim humor, all his own. Many are the illustrations we might adduce of this high-minded and generous temperament. For instance: meeting a French frigate of forty guns in the Straits, and signaling for the captain to come on board his flag-ship, the latter, considering the visit one of friendship and ceremony, there being no declared war between the two nations—though the French conduct at Toulon had determined England on measures of retaliation—readily complied with Blake's summons; but was astounded on entering the admiral's cabin, at being told he was a prisoner, and requested to give up his sword. No! was the surprised but resolute Frenchman's reply. Blake felt that an advantage had been gained by a misconception, and scorning to make a brave officer its victim, he told his guest he might go back to his ship, if he wished, and fight it out as long as he was able. The captain, we are told, thanked him for his handsome offer, and retired. After two hours' hard fighting, he struck his flag; like a true French knight, he made a low bow, kissed his sword affectionately, and delivered it to his conqueror. Again: when Blake captured the Dutch herring-fleet off Bochness, consisting of 600 boats, instead of destroying or appropriating them, he merely took a tithe of the whole freight, in merciful consideration toward the poor families whose entire capital and means of life it constituted. This "characteristic act of clemency" was censured by many as Quixotic, and worse. But "Blake took no trouble to justify his noble instincts against such critics. His was indeed a happy fate: the only fault ever advanced by friend or foe against his public life, was an excess of generosity toward his vanquished enemies!" His sense of the comic is amusingly evidenced by the story of his ruse during a dearth in the same siege. Tradition reports, that only one animal, a hog, was left alive in the town, and that more than half starved. In the afternoon, Blake, feeling that in their depression a laugh would do the defenders as much good as a dinner, had the hog carried to all the posts and whipped, so that its screams, heard in many places, might make the enemy suppose that fresh supplies had somehow been obtained.

In the noble nature of the man, there was a true connection to the finest qualities of a Cavalier, occasionally mixed with a unique dry wit. There are many examples we could share of this high-minded and generous temperament. For instance, when he encountered a French frigate of forty guns in the Straits and signaled for the captain to come aboard his flagship, the captain, viewing the visit as one of friendship and ceremony—as there was no declared war between the two nations, despite France's actions at Toulon prompting England's plans for retaliation—readily accepted Blake's invitation. However, he was shocked upon entering the admiral's cabin to be told he was a prisoner and asked to surrender his sword. “No!” replied the surprised but determined Frenchman. Realizing that a misunderstanding had taken place and not wanting to make a brave officer suffer for it, Blake told his guest that he could return to his ship if he wanted and fight as long as he could. The captain, it is said, thanked him for the generous offer and left. After two hours of intense fighting, he struck his flag; like a true French knight, he gave a deep bow, affectionately kissed his sword, and handed it to his conqueror. Another example: when Blake captured the Dutch herring fleet off Bochness, consisting of 600 boats, instead of destroying or taking them for himself, he only took a tenth of the total catch, showing mercy towards the poor families reliant on that fleet for their livelihood. This act of kindness was criticized by some as naïve and worse. But Blake did not bother to justify his noble instincts against such critics. His fate was indeed fortunate: the only fault ever pointed out by friends or enemies regarding his public life was an excess of generosity toward his defeated foes! His sense of humor is charmingly illustrated by the tale of his trick during a shortage in the same siege. It is said that only one animal, a pig, remained alive in the town while over half its population faced starvation. In the afternoon, sensing that a laugh would benefit the defenders just as much as a meal, Blake had the pig carried to all the posts and whipped so that its screams could be heard from many places, making the enemy believe that fresh supplies had somehow arrived.

The moral aspects of his character appear in this memoir in an admirable light. If he did not stand so high as some others in public notoriety, it was mainly because, to stand higher than he did, he must plant his feet on a bad eminence. His patriotism was as pure as Cromwell's was selfish. Mr. Dixon, his biographer, alludes to the strong points of contrast, as well as of resemblance between the two men. Both, he says, were sincerely religious, undauntedly brave, fertile in expedients, irresistible in action. Born in the same year, they began and almost closed their lives at the same time. Both were country gentlemen of moderate fortune; both were of middle age when the revolution came. Without previous knowledge or professional training, both attained to the highest honors of their respective services. But there the parallel ends. Anxious only for the glory and interest of his country, Blake took little or no care of his personal aggrandizement. His contempt for money, his impatience with the mere vanities of power, were supreme. Bribery he abhorred in all its shapes. He was frank and open to a fault; his heart was ever in his hand, and his mind ever on his lips. His honesty, modesty, generosity, sincerity, and magnanimity were unimpeached. Cromwell's inferior moral qualities made him distrust the great seaman; yet, now and then, as in the case of the street tumult at Malaga, he was fain to express his admiration of Robert Blake. The latter was wholly unversed in the science of nepotism, and "happy family" compacts; for, although desirous of aiding his relatives, he was jealous of the least offense on their part, and never overlooked it. Several instances of this disposition are on record. When his brother Samuel, in rash zeal for the Commonwealth, ventured to exceed his duty, and was killed in a fray which ensued, Blake was terribly shocked, but only said: "Sam had no business there." Afterward, however, he shut himself up in his room, and bewailed his loss in the words of Scripture: "Died Abner as a fool dieth!" His brother Benjamin, again, to whom he was strongly attached, falling under suspicion of neglect of duty, was instantly broken, and sent on shore. "This rigid measure of justice against his own flesh and blood, silenced every complaint, and the service gained immeasurably in spirit, discipline, and confidence." Yet more touching was the great admiral's inexorable treatment of his favorite brother Humphrey, who, in a moment of extreme agitation, had failed in his duty. The captains went to Blake in a body, and argued that Humphrey's fault was a neglect rather than a breach of orders, and suggested his being sent away to England till it was forgotten. But Blake was outwardly unmoved, though inwardly his bowels did yearn over his brother, and sternly said: "If none of you will accuse him, I must be his accuser." Humphrey was dismissed from the service. It is affecting to know how painfully Blake missed his familiar presence during his sick and lonely passage homeward, when the hand of death was upon that noble heart. To Humphrey he bequeathed the greater[Pg 102] part of the property which he left behind him. In the rare intervals of private life which he enjoyed on shore, Blake also compels our sincere regard. When released for awhile from political and professional duties, he loved to run down to Bridgewater for a few days or weeks, and, as his biographer says, with his chosen books, and one or two devout and abstemious friends, to indulge in all the luxuries of seclusion. "He was by nature self-absorbed and taciturn. His morning was usually occupied with a long walk, during which he appeared to his simple neighbors to be lost in profound thought, as if working out in his own mind the details of one of his great battles, or busy with some abstruse point of Puritan theology. If accompanied by one of his brothers, or by some other intimate friend, he was still for the most part silent. Always good-humored, and enjoying sarcasm when of a grave, high class, he yet never talked from the loquacious instinct, or encouraged others so to employ their time and talents in his presence. Even his lively and rattling brother Humphrey, his almost constant companion when on shore, caught, from long habit, the great man's contemplative and self-communing gait and manner; and when his friends rallied him on the subject in after-years, he used to say, that he had caught the trick of silence while walking by the admiral's side in his long morning musings on Knoll Hill. A plain dinner satisfied his wants. Religious conversation, reading, and the details of business, generally filled up the evening until supper-time; after family prayers—always pronounced by the general himself—he would invariably call for his cup of sack and a dry crust of bread, and while he drank two or three horns of Canary, would smile and chat in his own dry manner with his friends and domestics, asking minute questions about their neighbors and acquaintance; or when scholars or clergymen shared his simple repast, affecting a droll anxiety—rich and pleasant in the conqueror of Tromp—to prove, by the aptness and abundance of his quotations, that, in becoming an admiral, he had not forfeited his claim to be considered a good classic."

The moral aspects of his character shine throughout this memoir. While he didn't achieve the same level of public fame as some others, it was largely because, to rise higher, he would have had to compromise his principles. His patriotism was as genuine as Cromwell's was self-serving. Mr. Dixon, his biographer, points out both the strong contrasts and similarities between the two men. Both were sincerely religious, incredibly brave, resourceful, and decisive. They were born in the same year and nearly ended their lives at the same time. Both were country gentlemen with modest means, and both were middle-aged when the revolution occurred. With no prior experience or professional training, both reached the highest honors in their respective fields. But that's where the similarities end. Blake cared only for his country’s glory and interests, showing little concern for personal gain. He held a supreme disdain for money and was impatient with the trivialities of power. He abhorred bribery in all its forms. He was straightforward to a fault; his heart was always on his sleeve, and he spoke his mind freely. His honesty, modesty, generosity, sincerity, and nobility were unquestioned. Cromwell’s lesser moral qualities made him wary of the great sea captain; still, he occasionally expressed admiration for Robert Blake, as seen in the street chaos at Malaga. Blake had no knowledge of nepotism or family favoritism; while he wanted to help his relatives, he was quick to act against any offense from them and never let it slide. There are several examples of this mindset. When his brother Samuel, in his reckless enthusiasm for the Commonwealth, overstepped his duty and was killed in a confrontation, Blake was deeply shocked but only remarked, "Sam had no business there." Later, however, he locked himself in his room and mourned his loss with the Scripture: "Died Abner as a fool dieth!" His brother Benjamin, whom he was very close to, fell under suspicion of neglecting his duty and was immediately dismissed and sent home. "This harsh form of justice against his own kin silenced any complaints, and the service greatly improved in spirit, discipline, and confidence." Even more poignant was Blake's unwavering treatment of his beloved brother Humphrey, who, in a moment of great distress, failed to perform his duty. The captains gathered to plead that Humphrey's fault was more of a lapse than a failure to follow orders, suggesting he go back to England until the situation blew over. But Blake remained outwardly unyielding, though inside he felt maternal love for his brother, and firmly declared: "If none of you will accuse him, I must be his accuser." Humphrey was dismissed from the service. It’s heartbreaking to know how much Blake missed his brother's familiar presence during his sick and lonely journey homeward, when death loomed over that noble heart. He left most of his estate to Humphrey. In the rare moments away from public life that he experienced on land, Blake still commands our sincere respect. When he had a break from political and professional duties, he enjoyed retreating to Bridgewater for a few days or weeks, and, as his biographer states, he would immerse himself in all the comforts of solitude with his favorite books and a couple of devout, moderate friends. "By nature, he was introspective and reserved. His mornings were usually spent on long walks, during which his simple neighbors perceived him as lost in deep thought, possibly working through the intricacies of one of his major battles or pondering a complex point of Puritan theology. If accompanied by one of his brothers or another close friend, he remained mostly quiet. Always good-natured and enjoying sharp wit when it was serious and sophisticated, he didn’t chat just for the sake of talking, nor did he encourage others to waste their time or talents in his company. Even his lively and talkative brother Humphrey, who was often by his side at home, adopted the contemplative and introspective demeanor of the great man; and when teased about it later by friends, he would say he had picked up the habit of silence during their long morning walks on Knoll Hill. A simple meal was enough to satisfy him. Evenings were generally filled with religious discussions, reading, and business matters until supper time; after family prayers—always led by Blake himself—he would typically ask for a cup of sack and a dry piece of bread, and while sipping two or three glasses of Canary, he would smile and chat in his usual dry manner with friends and servants, asking detailed questions about their neighbors and acquaintances; or when scholars or clergy joined him for his simple dinner, he humorously worried—boastingly and pleasantly as the conqueror of Tromp—that by demonstrating his wealth of quotations, he hadn’t lost his status as a good classic while becoming an admiral."

The care and interest with which he looked to the well-being of his humblest followers, made him eminently popular in the fleet. He was always ready to hear complaints, and to rectify grievances. When wounded at the battle of Portland, and exhorted to go on shore for repose and proper medical treatment, he refused to seek for himself the relief which he had put in the way of his meanest comrade. Even at the early period of his cruise against the Cavalier corsairs of Kinsale, such was Blake's popularity, that numbers of men were continually joining him from the enemy's fleet, although he offered them less pay, and none of that license which they had enjoyed under Prince Rupert's flag. They gloried in following a leader sans peur et sans reproche—one with whose renown the whole country speedily rang—the renown of a man who had revived the traditional glories of the English navy, and proved that its meteor flag could "yet terrific burn."

The care and attention he showed for the well-being of his most humble followers made him extremely popular in the fleet. He was always willing to listen to complaints and fix grievances. When he was injured in the battle of Portland and urged to go ashore for rest and proper medical treatment, he refused to seek the relief that he had arranged for his lowest-ranking comrade. Even at the start of his mission against the Cavalier corsairs of Kinsale, Blake's popularity was such that many men continually joined him from the enemy's fleet, even though he offered them lower pay and none of the freedom they had enjoyed under Prince Rupert's flag. They took pride in following a leader sans peur et sans reproche—one whose fame quickly spread throughout the country—the fame of a man who had revived the traditional glories of the English navy and showed that its meteor flag could "yet terrific burn."


THE BRITISH MUSEUM AND ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS.
BY FREDRIKA BREMER.

London possesses two scenes of popular enjoyment on a great scale, in its British Museum and its Zoological Gardens. In the former, the glance is sent over the life of antiquity; in the latter, over that of the present time in the kingdom of nature; and in both may the Englishman enjoy a view of England's power and greatness, because it is the spirit of England which has compelled Egypt and Greece to remove hither their gods, their heroic statues: it is England whose courageous sons at this present moment force their way into the interior of Africa, that mysterious native land of miracles and of the Leviathan; it is an Englishman who held in his hand snow from the clefts of the remote Mountains of the Moon; it is England which has aroused that ancient Nineveh from her thousands of years of sleep in the desert; England, which has caused to arise from their graves, and to stand forth beneath the sky of England, those witnesses of the life and art of antiquity which are known under the name of the Nineveh Marbles, those magnificent but enigmatical figures which are called the Nineveh Bulls, in the immense wings of which one can not but admire the fine artistic skill of the workmanship, and from the beautiful human countenances of which glances Oriental despotism—with eyes such as those with which King Ahasuerus might have gazed on the beautiful Esther, when she sank fainting before the power of that glance. They have an extraordinary expression—these countenances of Nineveh, so magnificent, so strong, and at the same time, so joyous—a something about them so valiant and so joyously commanding! It was an expression which surprised me, and which I could not rightly comprehend. It would be necessary for me to see them yet again before I could fully satisfy myself whether this inexpressible, proudly joyous glance is one of wisdom or of stupidity! I could almost fancy it might be the latter, when I contemplate the expression of gentle majesty in the head of the Grecian Jupiter. Nevertheless, whether it be wisdom or stupidity—these representations of ancient Nineveh have a real grandeur and originality about them. Were they then representatives of life there? Was life there thus proud and joyous, thus unconscious of trouble, care, or death, thus valiant, and without all arrogance? Had it such eyes? Ah! and yet it has lain buried in the sand of the desert, lain forgotten there many thousand years. And now, when they once more look up with those large, magnificent eyes, they discover another world around them, another Nineveh which can not understand what they would say. Thus proudly might Nineveh have looked when the prophet uttered above her his "woe!" Such a glance does not accord with the life of earth.

London has two major attractions for public enjoyment: the British Museum and the Zoological Gardens. In the former, you can explore the life of ancient civilizations; in the latter, you can observe the present-day wonders of nature. In both places, an Englishman can take in a display of England's strength and greatness, as it is the spirit of England that has led Egypt and Greece to bring their gods and heroic statues here. It is England whose brave sons are currently pushing into the heart of Africa, that mysterious land of wonders and giant creatures; it is an Englishman who has held snow from the peaks of the distant Mountains of the Moon; it is England that has awakened ancient Nineveh from her thousands of years of slumber in the desert; England, which has brought forth from their graves and allowed to stand beneath the sky of England, the witnesses of ancient life and art known as the Nineveh Marbles, those stunning yet puzzling figures called the Nineveh Bulls, in the vast wings of which one can’t help but admire the exquisite craftsmanship, and from the beautiful human faces of which reflects an Oriental despotism—eyes reminiscent of those with which King Ahasuerus might have looked upon the lovely Esther when she fainted before the power of his gaze. These Nineveh faces have an extraordinary expression—so magnificent, so strong, and at the same time so joyful—something about them seems valiant and confidently commanding! It was an expression that amazed me, and I couldn’t quite grasp it. I would need to see them again to truly determine whether that indescribable, proudly joyful look is one of wisdom or foolishness! I could almost imagine it might be the latter when I consider the gentle majesty in the head of Grecian Jupiter. Nevertheless, whether it’s wisdom or foolishness—these depictions from ancient Nineveh have a genuine grandeur and originality. Were they then representatives of life there? Was life there so proud and joyful, so carefree of trouble, worry, or death, so brave, and yet so free of arrogance? Did it have such eyes? Ah! and yet it has lain buried in the desert sand, forgotten for thousands of years. And now, as they look up again with those large, magnificent eyes, they find another world around them, a different Nineveh that cannot understand what they want to say. Thus, Nineveh might have looked with pride when the prophet pronounced his "woe!" Such a gaze does not fit the earthly life.

In comparison with these latest discovered but most ancient works of art, the Egyptian statues fall infinitely short, bearing evidence of a degraded,[Pg 104] sensual humanity, and the same as regarded art. But neither of these, nor of the Elgin marbles, nor of many other treasures of art in the British Museum which testify at the same time to the greatness of foregone ages, and to the power of the English world-conquering intelligence, shall I say any thing, because time failed me rightly to observe them, and the Nineveh marbles almost bewitched me by their contemplation.

Compared to these newly discovered but ancient works of art, the Egyptian statues really fall short, showing signs of a degraded, sensual humanity, and the same can be said for the art. But I won’t say anything about these, nor about the Elgin marbles, nor many other art treasures in the British Museum that reflect the greatness of past ages and the strength of English world-conquering intelligence, because I didn’t have enough time to properly observe them, and the Nineveh marbles almost captivated me with their beauty.

It is to me difficult to imagine a greater pleasure than that of wandering through these halls, or than by a visit to the Zoological Garden which lies on one side of the Regent's Park. I would willingly reside near this park for a time, that I might again and again wander about in this world of animals from all zones, and listen to all that they have to relate, ice-bears and lions, turtles and eagles, the ourang-outang and the rhinoceros! The English Zoological Garden, although less fortunate in its locality than the Jardin des Plantes in Paris, is much richer as regards animals. That which at this time attracted hither most visitors was the new guest of the garden, a so-called river-horse or hippopotamus, lately brought hither from Upper Egypt, where it was taken when young. It was yet not full-grown, and had here its own keeper—an Arab—its own house, its own court, its own reservoir, to bathe and swim in! Thus it lived in a really princely hippopotamus fashion. I saw his highness ascend out of his bath in a particularly good-humor, and he looked to me like an enormous—pig, with an enormously broad snout. He was very fat, smooth, and gray, and awkward in his movements, like the elephant. Long-necked giraffes walked about, feeding from wooden racks in the court adjoining that of the hippopotamus, and glancing at us across it. One can scarcely imagine a greater contrast than in these animals.

It’s hard for me to think of a greater pleasure than wandering through these halls or visiting the Zoological Garden next to Regent's Park. I would happily spend some time living near this park just to stroll around in this world of animals from all over and listen to what they have to say—ice bears and lions, turtles and eagles, orangutans and rhinoceroses! The English Zoological Garden, while not as lucky in its location as the Jardin des Plantes in Paris, has a much richer collection of animals. At that time, the biggest attraction was the garden’s latest arrival, a hippopotamus, recently brought from Upper Egypt where it was captured as a baby. It wasn’t fully grown yet and had its own keeper—an Arab—its own house, its own yard, and its own pool to bathe and swim in! So it lived in a truly princely hippopotamus style. I saw him come out of his bath in a particularly good mood, and he looked to me like a giant pig with an enormous broad snout. He was very fat, smooth, and gray, moving awkwardly like an elephant. Long-necked giraffes strolled around, eating from wooden racks in the yard next to the hippopotamus’s, glancing over at us. One can hardly imagine a greater contrast than between these animals.

The eagles sate upon crags placed in a row beneath a lofty transparent arch of iron work, an arrangement which seemed to me excellent, and which I hope seemed so to them, in case they could forget that they were captives. Here they might breathe, here spread out their huge wings, see the free expanse of heaven, and the sun, and build habitations for themselves upon the rock. On the contrary, the lions, leopards, and such-like noble beasts of the desert, seemed to me particularly unhappy in their iron-grated stone vaults; and their perpetual, uneasy walking backward and forward in their cages—I could not see that without a feeling of distress. How beautiful they must be in the desert, or amid tropical woods, or in the wild caverns of the mountains, those grand, terrific beasts—how fearfully beautiful! One day I saw these animals during their feeding time. Two men went round with wooden vessels filled with pieces of raw meat; these were taken up with a large iron-pronged fork, and put, or rather flung, through the iron grating into the dens. It was terrible to see the savage joy, the fury, with which the food was received and swallowed down by the beasts. Three pieces of meat were[Pg 105] thrown into one great vault which was at that time empty, a door was then drawn up at the back of the vault, and three huge yellow lions with shaggy manes rushed roaring in, and at one spring each possessed himself of his piece of flesh. One of the lions held his piece between his teeth for certainly a quarter of an hour, merely growling and gloating over it in savage joy, while his flashing eyes glared upon the spectators, and his tail was swung from side to side with an expression of defiance. It was a splendid, but a fearful sight. One of my friends was accustomed sometimes to visit these animals in company with his little girl, a beautiful child, with a complexion like milk and cherries. The sight of her invariably produced great excitement in the lions. They seemed evidently to show their love to her in a ravenous manner.

The eagles sat on the cliffs lined up in a row under a tall, clear arch of ironwork, an arrangement that I thought was excellent, and I hoped they felt the same, even if they could forget they were captives. Here they could breathe, spread their massive wings, see the open sky and the sun, and build homes for themselves on the rock. On the other hand, the lions, leopards, and other majestic desert creatures seemed particularly unhappy in their iron-grated stone enclosures; I felt a sense of distress watching them pace back and forth in their cages. How beautiful they must be in the desert, in tropical forests, or in the wild caves of the mountains—those grand, fearsome beasts—how strikingly beautiful! One day, I saw these animals during feeding time. Two men walked around with wooden containers filled with raw meat, which they picked up with a large iron fork and flung through the iron grating into the dens. It was horrifying to witness the wild joy, the fury, with which the beasts devoured their food. Three pieces of meat were thrown into a large empty den; then a door at the back of the den was opened, and three massive yellow lions with shaggy manes burst in roaring, each springing to grab their piece of flesh. One of the lions held his piece in his mouth for at least fifteen minutes, simply growling and reveling in it with savage joy, while his fierce eyes glared at the spectators, and his tail swayed back and forth in a defiant manner. It was an impressive but terrifying sight. One of my friends often visited these animals with his little girl, a beautiful child with a complexion like milk and cherries. The sight of her always caused great excitement among the lions. They clearly showed their affection for her in a ravenous way.

The serpents were motionless in their glass house, and lay, half-asleep, curled around the trunks of trees. In the evening by lamp-light they become lively, and then, twisting about and flashing forth their snaky splendors, they present a fine spectacle. The snake-room, with its walls of glass, behind which the snakes live, reminded me of the old northern myth of Nastrond, the roof of which was woven of snakes' backs, the final home of the ungodly—an unpleasant, but vigorous picture. The most disagreeable and the ugliest of all the snakes, was that little snake which the beautiful Queen Cleopatra, herself false as a serpent, placed at her breast; a little gray, flat-headed snake which liked to bury itself in the sand.

The snakes were still in their glass enclosure, lying half-asleep and curled around the trunks of trees. In the evening, under the lamp's glow, they became active, twisting and displaying their shimmering scales, putting on quite a show. The snake room, with its glass walls where the snakes lived, reminded me of the old northern myth of Nastrond, whose roof was made of snakes' backs, the final resting place for the wicked—an unsettling but vivid image. The most unpleasant and ugliest of all the snakes was the small one that the beautiful Queen Cleopatra, as deceptive as a snake herself, placed against her chest; a little gray, flat-headed snake that liked to bury itself in the sand.

The monkey-family lead a sad life; stretch out their hands for nuts or for bread, with mournful human gestures; contentious, beaten, oppressed, thrust aside, frightening one another, the stronger the weaker—mournfully human also.

The monkey family lives a sad life; they reach out their hands for nuts or bread with sorrowful human-like gestures; they're argumentative, beaten down, oppressed, pushed aside, scaring each other— the stronger preying on the weaker— also sadly human.

Sad, also, was the sight of an ourang-outang, spite of all its queer grimaces, solitary in its house, for it evidently suffered ennui, was restless, and would go out. It embraced its keeper and kissed him with real human tenderness. The countenance, so human, yet without any human intelligence, made a painful impression upon me; so did the friendly tame creature here, longing for its fellows, and seeing around it only human beings. Thou poor animal! Fain would I have seen thee in the primeval woods of Africa, caressing thy wife in the clear moonlight of the tropical night, sporting with her among the branches of the trees, and sleeping upon them, rocked by the warm night wind. There thy ugliness would have had a sort of picturesque beauty. After the strange beast-man had climbed hither and thither along the iron railing, seizing the bars with his hands, and feet which resembled hands, and also with his teeth, he took a white woolen blanket, wrapped it around him in a very complicated manner, and ended by laying himself down as a human being might do, in his chilly, desolate room.

Sad, too, was the sight of an orangutan, despite all its strange facial expressions, alone in its enclosure, clearly suffering from boredom, restless, and wanting to go outside. It hugged its keeper and kissed him with genuine human affection. The face, so human-looking yet lacking any human intelligence, left a painful impression on me; so did the friendly, tame creature here, yearning for its companions while surrounded only by humans. Oh, poor animal! I would have loved to see you in the ancient forests of Africa, cuddling your mate in the bright moonlight of a warm tropical night, playing with her among the tree branches, and sleeping on them, rocked by the gentle night breeze. There, your ugliness would have had a kind of picturesque beauty. After the strange beast-man climbed up and down the iron railing, grabbing the bars with his hands, which looked like feet, and even with his teeth, he took a white wool blanket, wrapped it around himself in a very complicated way, and finally laid down as a human would, in his cold, empty room.

After this, all the more charming was the spectacle presented by the water-fowl from every zone—Ducks, Swans, and Co., all quite at home[Pg 106] here, swimming in the clear waters, among little green islands on which they had their little huts. It was most charmingly pretty and complete. And the mother-duck with her little, lively golden-yellow flock, swimming neck and heels after her, or seeking shelter under her wings, is at all times one of the most lovely scenes of natural life—resembling humanity in a beautiful manner.

After this, the sight of the waterfowl from every region was even more delightful—Ducks, Swans, and others, all feeling right at home[Pg 106] here, gliding through the clear waters amidst little green islands where they had their cozy huts. It was incredibly charming and picturesque. The mother duck with her lively golden-yellow ducklings, swimming closely behind her, or seeking shelter under her wings, is always one of the most beautiful scenes in nature—mirroring humanity in a lovely way.

Even among the wild beasts I saw a beautiful human trait of maternal affection. A female leopard had in her cage two young cubs, lively and playful as puppies. When the man threw the flesh into her cage, she drew herself back and let the young ones first seize upon the piece.

Even among the wild animals, I noticed a beautiful human quality of maternal love. A female leopard had two young cubs in her cage, lively and playful like puppies. When a man tossed some meat into her cage, she stepped back and let the cubs grab the piece first.

Crows from all parts of the world here live together in one neighborhood, and that the chattering and laughter was loud here did not surprise me, neither that the European crows so well maintained their place among their fellows. That which, however, astonished and delighted me was, the sweet flute-like melodious tones of the Australian crow. In the presence of this crow from Paradise—for originally it must have come therefrom—it seemed to me that all the other crows ought to have kept silence with their senseless chattering. But they were nothing but crows, and they liked better to hear themselves.

Crows from all over the world lived together in one neighborhood, and I wasn’t surprised by the loud chattering and laughter here, nor that the European crows held their ground among their peers. What truly amazed and delighted me was the sweet, flute-like melodies of the Australian crow. With this crow from Paradise—since it must have originally come from there—it felt to me like the other crows should have fallen silent with their mindless chatter. But they were just crows, and they preferred to listen to themselves.

Parrots from all lands lived and quarreled together in a large room, and they there made such a loud screaming, that in order to stand it out one must have been one of their own relations. Better be among the silent, dejected, stealthy, hissing, shining snakes, than in company with parrots! The former might kill the body, but the latter the soul.

Parrots from everywhere lived and fought together in a big room, making such a loud noise that you had to be one of them to tolerate it. It’s better to be with silent, gloomy, sneaky, hissing, shiny snakes than to be around parrots! The snakes might kill the body, but the parrots would kill the soul.

Twilight came on, and drove me out of the Zoological Garden each time I was there, and before I had seen all its treasures. Would that I might return there yet a third time and remain still longer!

Twilight came, and it sent me out of the Zoo every time I visited, before I could see all its wonders. I wish I could go back there a third time and stay even longer!


A TERRIBLY STRANGE BED.

The most difficult likeness I ever had to take, not even excepting my first attempt in the art of Portrait-painting, was a likeness of a gentleman named Faulkner. As far as drawing and coloring went, I had no particular fault to find with my picture; it was the expression of the sitter which I had failed in rendering—a failure quite as much his fault as mine. Mr. Faulkner, like many other persons by whom I have been employed, took it into his head that he must assume an expression, because he was sitting for his likeness; and, in consequence, contrived to look as unlike himself as possible, while I was painting him. I had tried to divert his attention from his own face, by talking with him on all sorts of topics. We had both traveled a great deal, and felt interested alike in many subjects connected with our wanderings over the same countries. Occasionally, while we were discussing our traveling experiences, the unlucky set-look left his countenance, and I began to work to some purpose; but it was always disastrously sure to return again, before I had[Pg 107] made any great progress—or, in other words, just at the very time when I was most anxious that it should not re-appear. The obstacle thus thrown in the way of the satisfactory completion of my portrait, was the more to be deplored, because Mr. Faulkner's natural expression was a very remarkable one. I am not an author, so I can not describe it. I ultimately succeeded in painting it, however; and this was the way in which I achieved my success:

The hardest likeness I ever had to capture, even more than my first attempt at portrait painting, was of a gentleman named Faulkner. As far as the drawing and coloring went, I didn't have any specific complaints about my picture; it was the expression of the sitter that I struggled to capture—a failure that was just as much his fault as mine. Mr. Faulkner, like many others I’ve worked with, thought he needed to put on a specific expression because he was sitting for his likeness, and as a result, he managed to look as unlike himself as possible while I was painting him. I tried to distract him from focusing on his own face by chatting about various topics. We had both traveled a lot and were interested in many subjects related to our journeys in the same countries. Occasionally, while talking about our travel experiences, the awkward look would leave his face, and I was able to make some progress; but it always somehow returned before I had[Pg 107] made any significant progress—or, in other words, just when I was most anxious for it not to come back. The obstacle to completing my portrait satisfactorily was even more frustrating because Mr. Faulkner's natural expression was quite remarkable. I'm not a writer, so I can’t describe it. However, I eventually managed to paint it, and this is how I achieved my success:

On the morning when my sitter was coming to me for the fourth time, I was looking at his portrait in no very agreeable mood—looking at it, in fact, with the disheartening conviction that the picture would be a perfect failure, unless the expression in the face represented were thoroughly altered and improved from nature. The only method of accomplishing this successfully, was to make Mr. Faulkner, somehow, insensibly forget that he was sitting for his picture. What topic could I lead him to talk on, which would entirely engross his attention while I was at work on his likeness?—I was still puzzling my brains to no purpose on this subject, when Mr. Faulkner entered my studio; and, shortly afterward, an accidental circumstance gained for me the very object which my own ingenuity had proved unequal to compass.

On the morning my sitter was coming to me for the fourth time, I was looking at his portrait in a pretty bad mood—looking at it, in fact, with the discouraging belief that the picture would be a total fail unless the expression on the face was completely changed and improved from real life. The only way to do this successfully was to somehow make Mr. Faulkner forget that he was posing for his portrait. What topic could I get him to talk about that would completely consume his attention while I worked on capturing his likeness? I was still trying to think of something when Mr. Faulkner walked into my studio; and, shortly after that, a random event gave me exactly what I needed, which my own cleverness hadn’t managed to achieve.

While I was "setting" my pallet, my sitter amused himself by turning over some portfolios. He happened to select one for special notice, which contained several sketches that I had made in the streets of Paris. He turned over the first five views rapidly enough; but when he came to the sixth, I saw his face flush directly; and observed that he took the drawing out of the portfolio, carried it to the window, and remained silently absorbed in the contemplation of it for full five minutes. After that, he turned round to me; and asked, very anxiously, if I had any objection to part with that sketch.

While I was "setting" my palette, my sitter entertained himself by looking through some portfolios. He happened to pick one for special attention, which had several sketches I made on the streets of Paris. He flipped through the first five views quickly; but when he got to the sixth, I noticed his face flush immediately and saw him take the drawing out of the portfolio, walk over to the window, and stay quietly focused on it for a full five minutes. After that, he turned to me and asked, very anxiously, if I would mind parting with that sketch.

It was the least interesting drawing of the series—merely a view in one of the streets running by the backs of the houses in the Palais Royal. Some four or five of these houses were comprised in the view, which was of no particular use to me in any way; and which was too valueless, as a work of Art, for me to think of selling it to my kind patron. I begged his acceptance of it, at once. He thanked me quite warmly; and then, seeing that I looked a little surprised at the odd selection he had made from my sketches, laughingly asked me if I could guess why he had been so anxious to become possessed of the view which I had given him?

It was the least interesting drawing of the series—just a view of one of the streets behind the houses in the Palais Royal. About four or five of these houses were included in the scene, which wasn’t useful to me at all; and it was too worthless, as a piece of art, for me to consider selling it to my generous patron. I offered it to him right away. He thanked me sincerely; and then, noticing that I seemed a bit surprised by his unusual choice from my sketches, he jokingly asked me if I could guess why he was so eager to have the view I had given him.

"Probably"—I answered—"there is some remarkable historical association connected with that street at the back of the Palais Royal, of which I am ignorant."

"Probably," I answered, "there's some amazing historical connection linked to that street behind the Palais Royal that I don't know about."

"No"—said Mr. Faulkner—"at least, none that I know of. The only association connected with the place in my mind, is a purely personal association. Look at this house in your drawing—the house with the water-pipe running down it from top to bottom. I once passed a night there—a night I shall never forget to the[Pg 108] day of my death. I have had some awkward traveling adventures in my time; but that adventure—! Well, well! suppose we begin the sitting. I make but a bad return for your kindness in giving me the sketch, by thus wasting your time in mere talk."

"No," Mr. Faulkner said, "at least none that I know of. The only connection I have to this place is a personal one. Look at the house in your drawing—the one with the water pipe running down it from top to bottom. I once spent a night there—a night I will never forget until the day I die. I've had some awkward travel experiences in my time, but that adventure—! Well, suppose we start the meeting. I'm not repaying your kindness in giving me the sketch by wasting your time with all this talking."

He had not long occupied the sitter's chair (looking pale and thoughtful), when he returned—involuntarily, as it seemed—to the subject of the house in the back street. Without, I hope, showing any undue curiosity, I contrived to let him see that I felt a deep interest in every thing he now said. After two or three preliminary hesitations, he at last, to my great joy, fairly started on the narrative of his adventure. In the interest of his subject he soon completely forgot that he was sitting for his portrait—the very expression that I wanted, came over his face—my picture proceeded toward completion, in the right direction, and to the best purpose. At every fresh touch, I felt more and more certain that I was now getting the better of my grand difficulty; and I enjoyed the additional gratification of having my work lightened by the recital of a true story, which possessed, in my estimation, all the excitement of the most exciting romance.

He hadn't been in the sitter's chair long (looking pale and deep in thought) when he unexpectedly returned to the topic of the house on the back street. Without, I hope, appearing overly curious, I managed to let him know that I was really interested in everything he was saying. After two or three hesitant starts, he finally, to my great delight, began sharing the story of his adventure. In his enthusiasm for the topic, he soon completely forgot he was sitting for his portrait—the exact expression I was hoping for came over his face—my painting was progressing well, moving in the right direction and serving its purpose. With each new brushstroke, I felt more and more confident that I was overcoming my biggest challenge; I also found extra pleasure in the fact that my work was made easier by hearing a true story that, in my opinion, had all the thrills of an exciting romance.

This, as nearly as I can recollect, is, word for word, how Mr. Faulkner told me the story:—

This, as far as I can remember, is, word for word, how Mr. Faulkner told me the story:—

Shortly before the period when gambling-houses were suppressed by the French Government, I happened to be staying at Paris with an English friend. We were both young men then, and lived, I am afraid, a very dissipated life, in the very dissipated city of our sojourn. One night, we were idling about the neighborhood of the Palais Royal, doubtful to what amusement we should next betake ourselves. My friend proposed a visit to Frascati's; but his suggestion was not to my taste. I knew Frascati's, as the French saying is, by heart; had lost and won plenty of five-franc pieces there, "merely for the fun of the thing," until it was "fun" no longer; and was thoroughly tired, in fact, of all the ghastly respectabilities of such a social anomaly as a respectable gambling-house. "For Heaven's sake"—said I to my friend—"let us go somewhere where we can see a little genuine, blackguard, poverty-stricken gaming, with no false gingerbread glitter thrown over it at all. Let us get away from fashionable Frascati's, to a house where they don't mind letting in a man with a ragged coat, or a man with no coat, ragged or otherwise."—"Very well," said my friend, "we needn't go out of the Palais Royal to find the sort of company you want. Here's the place, just before us; as blackguard a place, by all report, as you could possibly wish to see." In another minute we arrived at the door, and entered the house, the back of which you have drawn in your sketch.

Shortly before the French Government shut down gambling houses, I was staying in Paris with an English friend. We were both young guys back then, and I’m afraid we lived a pretty wild life in the very party city we were in. One night, we were wandering around the Palais Royal, unsure of what to do next. My friend suggested checking out Frascati's, but I wasn't interested. I knew Frascati's inside and out; I had lost and won plenty of five-franc pieces there, “just for fun,” until it stopped being “fun,” and I was thoroughly fed up with the phony respectability of a place like that. “For Heaven's sake,” I said to my friend, “let’s go somewhere where we can see some real, rough, down-and-out gambling, without all the fake glam. Let’s get away from trendy Frascati's to a place that doesn’t care if a guy shows up in a ragged coat or no coat at all.” “Alright,” my friend said, “we don’t even have to leave the Palais Royal to find the kind of crowd you want. Here’s a spot, right in front of us; it's supposed to be as rough a place as you could want.” A minute later, we reached the door and entered the establishment that you’ve sketched.

When we got up-stairs, and had left our hats and sticks with the doorkeeper, we were admitted into the chief gambling-room. We did not find many people assembled there. But, few as the men were who looked up at us on our entrance,[Pg 109] they were all types—miserable types—of their respective classes. We had come to see blackguards; but these men were something worse. There is a comic side, more or less appreciable, in all blackguardism—here, there was nothing but tragedy; mute, weird tragedy. The quiet in the room was horrible. The thin, haggard, long-haired young man, whose sunken eyes fiercely watched the turning up of the cards, never spoke; the flabby, fat-faced, pimply player, who pricked his piece of pasteboard perseveringly, to register how often black won, and how often red—never spoke; the dirty, wrinkled old man, with the vulture eyes, and the darned great coat, who had lost his last sous, and still looked on desperately, after he could play no longer—never spoke. Even the voice of the croupier sounded as if it were strangely dulled and thickened in the atmosphere of the room. I had entered the place to laugh; I felt that if I stood quietly looking on much longer, I should be more likely to weep. So, to excite myself out of the depression of spirits which was fast stealing over me, I unfortunately went to the table, and began to play. Still more unfortunately, as the event will show, I won—won prodigiously; won incredibly; won at such a rate, that the regular players at the table crowded round me; and staring at my stakes with hungry, superstitious eyes, whispered to one another that the English stranger was going to break the bank.

When we got upstairs and left our hats and canes with the doorkeeper, we were led into the main gambling room. There weren't many people there. But the few men who looked up at us as we entered were all miserable examples of their respective types. We had come to see lowlifes, but these men were something worse. There’s a comic side, to some extent, in all lowlife behavior—here, there was nothing but tragedy; silent, eerie tragedy. The stillness in the room was unsettling. The thin, gaunt young guy with long hair and sunken eyes intensely watched the cards being flipped, never spoke; the chubby, pockmarked player who kept poking his piece of cardboard to keep track of how often black won and how often red—never spoke; the dirty, wrinkled old man with vulture-like eyes and a patched-up overcoat, who had lost his last cents and continued to watch desperately, even though he couldn’t play anymore—never spoke. Even the croupier’s voice sounded oddly muffled and thick in the atmosphere of the room. I had come in hoping to laugh; I felt that if I kept quietly watching much longer, I would likely end up crying. So, to pull myself out of the gloom that was quickly creeping in, I made the poor choice of going to the table and starting to play. Even worse, as it turned out, I won—won big; won unbelievably; won at such a pace that the regular players at the table gathered around me, staring at my bets with greedy, superstitious eyes, whispering to one another that the English stranger was going to break the bank.

The game was Rouge et Noir. I had played at it in every city in Europe, without, however, the care or the wish to study the Theory of Chances—that philosopher's stone of all gamblers! And a gambler, in the strict sense of the word, I had never been. I was heart-whole from the corroding passion for play. My gaming was a mere idle amusement. I never resorted to it by necessity, because I never knew what it was to want money. I never practiced it so incessantly as to lose more than I could afford, or to gain more than I could coolly pocket, without being thrown off my balance by my good luck. In short, I had hitherto frequented gambling-tables—just as I frequented ball-rooms and opera-houses—because they amused me, and because I had nothing better to do with my leisure hours.

The game was Rouge et Noir. I had played it in every city across Europe, but I never bothered to learn the Theory of Chances—that ultimate secret of all gamblers! And I had never really been a gambler in the strict sense. I was free from the obsessive passion for playing. For me, gaming was just a casual pastime. I never turned to it out of necessity, since I never experienced what it was like to be short on money. I never played so often that I would lose more than I could afford or win so much that it would overwhelm me. Basically, I went to gambling tables—just like I went to ballrooms and opera houses—because they entertained me, and I had nothing better to do with my free time.

But, on this occasion, it was very different—now, for the first time in my life, I felt what the passion for play really was. My success first bewildered, and then, in the most literal meaning of the word, intoxicated me. Incredible as it may appear, it is nevertheless true, that I only lost, when I attempted to estimate chances, and played according to previous calculation. If I left every thing to luck, and staked without any care or consideration, I was sure to win—to win in the face of every recognized probability in favor of the bank. At first, some of the men present ventured their money safely enough on my color; but I speedily increased my stakes to sums which they dared not risk. One after another they left off playing, and breathlessly looked[Pg 110] on at my game. Still, time after time, I staked higher and higher; and still won. The excitement in the room rose to fever pitch. The silence was interrupted, by a deep, muttered chorus of oaths and exclamations in different languages, every time the gold was shoveled across to my side of the table—even the imperturbable croupier dashed his rake on the floor in a (French) fury of astonishment at my success. But one man present preserved his self-possession; and that man was my friend. He came to my side, and whispering in English, begged me to leave the place, satisfied with what I had already gained. I must do him the justice to say, that he repeated his warnings and entreaties several times; and only left me and went away, after I had rejected his advice (I was to all intents and purposes gambling-drunk) in terms which rendered it impossible for him to address me again that night.

But this time was totally different—now, for the first time in my life, I truly felt what the passion for playing was all about. My initial success confused me, and then, quite literally, got me hooked. It sounds unbelievable, but it’s true that I only lost when I tried to analyze the odds and played based on calculations. When I left everything up to chance and bet without any thought, I was guaranteed to win—against all odds in favor of the house. At first, some of the guys there bet safely on my color, but I quickly raised my bets to amounts they were too scared to risk. One by one, they stopped playing and just watched my game in disbelief. Still, I kept betting higher and higher; and I kept winning. The tension in the room reached a fever pitch. The silence was broken by a low, muttered chorus of curses and exclamations in different languages every time the dealer pushed the chips over to my side of the table—even the usually unflappable dealer slammed his rake on the floor in a fit of astonishment at my winning streak. But one person stayed calm, and that was my friend. He came over to me and, whispering in English, urged me to leave while I was ahead. I have to give him credit; he repeated his warnings and pleas multiple times, and he only left after I had dismissed his advice (I was essentially gambling-drunk) in such a way that made it impossible for him to talk to me again that night.

Shortly after he had gone, a hoarse voice behind me cried: "Permit me, my dear sir!—permit me to restore to their proper place two Napoleons which you have dropped. Wonderful luck, sir!—I pledge you my word of honor as an old soldier, in the course of my long experience in this sort of thing, I never saw such luck as yours!—never! Go on, sir—Sacré mille bombes! Go on boldly, and break the bank!"

Shortly after he left, a raspy voice behind me shouted, "Excuse me, good sir!—let me return these two Napoleons you've dropped. What amazing luck, sir!—I promise you as an old soldier, in all my years of experience with this kind of thing, I've never seen such luck as yours!—never! Keep going, sir—Sacré mille bombes! Keep going boldly and beat the bank!"

I turned round and saw, nodding and smiling at me with inveterate civility, a tall man, dressed in a frogged and braided surtout. If I had been in my senses, I should have considered him, personally, as being rather a suspicious specimen of an old soldier. He had goggling, bloodshot eyes, mangy mustaches, and a broken nose. His voice betrayed a barrack-room intonation of the worst order, and he had the dirtiest pair of hands I ever saw—even in France. These little personal peculiarities exercised, however, no repelling influence on me. In the mad excitement, the reckless triumph of that moment, I was ready to "fraternize" with any body who encouraged me in my game. I accepted the old soldier's offered pinch of snuff; clapped him on the back, and swore he was the honestest fellow in the world; the most glorious relic of the Grand Army that I had ever met with. "Go on!" cried my military friend, snapping his fingers in ecstasy—"Go on, and win! Break the bank—Mille tonnerres! my gallant English comrade, break the bank!"

I turned around and saw a tall man nodding and smiling at me with a forced politeness, dressed in a frogged and braided coat. If I had been thinking clearly, I would have found him a bit suspicious for an old soldier. He had bulging, bloodshot eyes, shabby mustaches, and a broken nose. His voice had the rough twang of a barrack room, and he had the dirtiest hands I had ever seen—even in France. However, these little quirks didn't put me off at all. In the crazy excitement and reckless triumph of that moment, I was ready to buddy up with anyone who encouraged me in my game. I took the old soldier's offered pinch of snuff, slapped him on the back, and declared he was the most honest guy in the world; the most glorious relic of the Grand Army that I had ever met. "Go on!" shouted my military friend, snapping his fingers in delight—"Go on, and win! Break the bank—Mille tonnerres! my brave English comrade, break the bank!"

And I did go on—went on at such a rate, that in another quarter of an hour the croupier called out: "Gentlemen! the bank has discontinued for to-night." All the notes, and all the gold in that "bank," now lay in a heap under my hands; the whole floating capital of the gambling-house was waiting to pour into my pockets!

And I did keep going—went on so fast that in another fifteen minutes the dealer announced, "Gentlemen! The house has closed for the night." All the cash and the gold in that "house" were now piled up under my hands; the entire available funds of the casino were ready to fill my pockets!

"Tie up the money in your pocket-handkerchief, my worthy sir," said the old soldier, as I wildly plunged my hands into my heap of gold. "Tie it up, as we used to tie up a bit of dinner in the Grand Army; your winnings are too heavy for any breeches pockets that ever were sewed. There! that's it!—shovel them in, notes[Pg 111] and all! Credié! what luck!—Stop! another Napoleon on the floor! Ah! sacré petit polisson de Napoleon! have I found thee at last? Now, then, sir—two tight double knots each way with your honorable permission, and the money's safe. Feel it! feel it, fortunate sir! hard and round as a cannon ball—Ah, bah! if they had only fired such cannon balls at us at Austerlitz—nom d'une pipe! if they only had! And now, as an ancient grenadier, as an ex-brave of the French army, what remains for me to do? I ask what? Simply this: to entreat my valued English friend to drink a bottle of champagne with me, and toast the goddess Fortune in foaming goblets before we part!"

"Tie up the cash in your handkerchief, my good sir," said the old soldier, as I frantically shoved my hands into my pile of gold. "Tie it up, just like we used to wrap up a bit of food in the Grand Army; your winnings are too bulky for any pockets that have ever been sewn. There! That's it!—just shovel them in, bills and all! Wow! what luck!—Wait! There's another Napoleon on the floor! Ah! you little rascal Napoleon! Have I finally found you? Now then, sir—two tight double knots each way, with your kind permission, and the money's secure. Feel it! Feel it, lucky sir! Hard and round like a cannonball—Ah, come on! if they had only fired such cannonballs at us at Austerlitz—my goodness! if only they had! And now, as an old grenadier, as a former brave of the French army, what do I have left to do? I ask you, what? Simply this: to ask my valued English friend to share a bottle of champagne with me and toast the goddess of Fortune in bubbly glasses before we part!"

Excellent ex-brave! Convivial ancient grenadier! Champagne by all means! An English cheer for an old soldier! Hurrah! hurrah! Another English cheer for the goddess Fortune! Hurrah! Hurrah! Hurrah!

Excellent ex-brave! Friendly old grenadier! Champagne for sure! A cheer for an old soldier from England! Hurrah! Hurrah! Another cheer from England for the goddess Fortune! Hurrah! Hurrah! Hurrah!

"Bravo! the Englishman; the amiable, gracious Englishman, in whose veins circulates the vivacious blood of France! Another glass? Ah, bah!—the bottle is empty! Never mind! Vive le vin! I, the old soldier, order another bottle, and half a pound of bon-bons with it!"

"Cheers to the Englishman; the charming, friendly Englishman, whose lively blood comes from France! Another drink? Oh, come on!—the bottle's empty! It’s fine! Long live the wine! I, the old soldier, will order another bottle, and half a pound of candy with it!"

No, no, ex-brave; never—ancient grenadier! Your bottle last time; my bottle this. Behold it! Toast away! The French Army!—the great Napoleon!—the present company! the croupier! the honest croupier's wife and daughters—if he has any! the Ladies generally! Every body in the world!

No, no, former soldier; never—old grenadier! Your drink last time; my drink this. Look at it! Raise a toast! The French Army!—the great Napoleon!—everyone here! The dealer! The dealer's honest wife and daughters—if he has any! The ladies in general! Everyone in the world!

By the time the second bottle of champagne was emptied, I felt as if I had been drinking liquid fire—my brain seemed all a flame. No excess in wine had ever had this effect on me before in my life. Was it the result of a stimulant acting upon my system when I was in a highly-excited state? Was my stomach in a particularly disordered condition? Or was the champagne particularly strong?

By the time the second bottle of champagne was gone, I felt like I was drinking liquid fire—my mind felt completely on fire. I had never experienced this kind of effect from wine before in my life. Was it a stimulant affecting me while I was already highly excited? Was my stomach in a particularly messy state? Or was the champagne just really strong?

"Ex-brave of the French Army!" cried I, in a mad state of exhilaration. "I am on fire! how are you? You have set me on fire! Do you hear; my hero of Austerlitz? Let us have a third bottle of champagne to put the flame out!" The old soldier wagged his head, rolled his goggle-eyes, until I expected to see them slip out of their sockets; placed his dirty forefinger by the side of his broken nose; solemnly ejaculated "Coffee!" and immediately ran off into an inner room.

"Ex-brave of the French Army!" I shouted, feeling completely exhilarated. "I am on fire! How are you? You've set me on fire! Do you hear me, my hero of Austerlitz? Let’s have another bottle of champagne to put the flame out!" The old soldier shook his head, rolled his goggle-eyes, and I thought they might pop out of their sockets; he put his dirty forefinger next to his broken nose, solemnly exclaimed, "Coffee!" and immediately dashed off into another room.

The word pronounced by the eccentric veteran, seemed to have a magical effect on the rest of the company present. With one accord they all rose to depart. Probably they had expected to profit by my intoxication; but finding that my new friend was benevolently bent on preventing me from getting dead drunk, had now abandoned all hope of thriving pleasantly on my winnings. Whatever their motive might be, at any rate they went away in a body. When the old soldier returned, and sat down again opposite to me at the table, we had the room to ourselves. I could see the croupier, in a sort of vestibule which[Pg 112] opened out of it, eating his supper in solitude. The silence was now deeper than ever.

The word spoken by the quirky veteran seemed to have a magical effect on everyone else in the room. In unison, they all stood up to leave. They probably thought they could take advantage of my intoxication, but realizing that my new friend was genuinely trying to keep me from getting completely wasted, they had given up hope of benefiting from my winnings. Whatever their reasons were, they all left as a group. When the old soldier returned and sat down across from me at the table, we had the room to ourselves. I could see the croupier in a small hallway that opened off the room, eating his dinner alone. The silence was now deeper than ever.

A sudden change, too, had come over the "ex-brave." He assumed a portentously solemn look; and when he spoke to me again, his speech was ornamented by no oaths, enforced by no finger-snapping, enlivened by no apostrophes, or exclamations.

A sudden change had also come over the "ex-brave." He took on a seriously solemn expression; and when he spoke to me again, his words were free of any swearing, lacking any finger-snapping, and void of any outbursts or exclamations.

"Listen, my dear sir," said he, in mysteriously confidential tones—"listen to an old soldier's advice. I have been to the mistress of the house (a very charming woman, with a genius for cookery!) to impress on her the necessity of making us some particularly strong and good coffee. You must drink this coffee in order to get rid of your little amiable exaltation of spirits, before you think of going home—you must, my good and gracious friend! With all that money to take home to-night, it is a sacred duty to yourself to have your wits about you. You are known to be a winner to an enormous extent, by several gentlemen present to-night, who, in a certain point of view, are very worthy and excellent fellows; but they are mortal men, my dear sir, and they have their amiable weaknesses! Need I say more? Ah, no, no! you understand me! Now, this is what you must do—send for a cabriolet when you feel quite well again—draw up all the windows when you get into it—and tell the driver to take you home only through the large and well-lighted thoroughfares. Do this; and you and your money will be safe. Do this; and to-morrow you will thank an old soldier for giving you a word of honest advice."

"Listen, my dear sir," he said in a mysteriously confidential tone, "listen to an old soldier's advice. I just spoke to the lady of the house—a lovely woman with a talent for cooking!—to stress the need for her to make us some really strong and good coffee. You need to drink this coffee to shake off your little burst of excitement before you think about heading home—you *must*, my good and gracious friend! With all that money you have to take home tonight, it’s essential for you to keep your wits about you. You’re known to have won quite a lot, by several gentlemen here tonight who, from one perspective, are decent and fine fellows; but they are only human, my dear sir, and they have their charming weaknesses! Do I need to say more? Ah, no, no! You understand me! Now, this is what you have to do—call for a cab when you feel better—close all the windows once you get in—and tell the driver to take you home only through the main and well-lit streets. Do this; and both you and your money will be safe. Do this; and tomorrow you’ll thank an old soldier for giving you some honest advice."

Just as the ex-brave ended his oration in very lachrymose tones, the coffee came in, ready poured out in two cups. My attentive friend handed me one of the cups, with a bow. I was parched with thirst, and drank it off at a draught. Almost instantly afterward, I was seized with a fit of giddiness, and felt more completely intoxicated than ever. The room whirled round and round furiously; the old soldier seemed to be regularly bobbing up and down before me, like the piston of a steam-engine. I was half-deafened by a violent singing in my ears; a feeling of utter bewilderment, helplessness, idiotcy, overcame me. I rose from my chair, holding on by the table to keep my balance; and stammered out, that I felt dreadfully unwell—so unwell, that I did not know how I was to get home.

Just as the former soldier finished his speech in very tearful tones, the coffee came in, already poured into two cups. My attentive friend handed me one of the cups with a bow. I was so thirsty that I drank it all at once. Almost immediately afterward, I was hit with a wave of dizziness and felt more completely intoxicated than ever. The room spun around furiously; the old soldier seemed to be bouncing up and down in front of me, like the piston of a steam engine. I was nearly deafened by a loud ringing in my ears; a feeling of total confusion, helplessness, and foolishness overwhelmed me. I got up from my chair, holding onto the table to steady myself, and stammered out that I felt really unwell—so unwell that I didn’t know how I was going to get home.

"My dear friend," answered the old soldier; and even his voice seemed to be bobbing up and down, as he spoke—"My dear friend, it would be madness to go home, in your state. You would be sure to lose your money; you might be robbed and murdered with the greatest ease. I am going to sleep here: do you sleep here, too—they make up capital beds in this house—take one; sleep off the effects of the wine, and go home safely with your winnings, to-morrow—to-morrow, in broad daylight."

"My dear friend," said the old soldier, and even his voice seemed to be bouncing as he spoke, "My dear friend, it would be crazy to go home in your state. You would definitely lose your money; you could easily get robbed or worse. I am going to sleep here; you should sleep here too—they have great beds in this place—take one; sleep off the effects of the wine, and go home safely with your winnings tomorrow—in broad daylight."

I had no power of thinking, no feeling of any kind, but the feeling that I must lie down somewhere, immediately, and fall off into a cool, refreshing, comfortable sleep. So I agreed eagerly[Pg 113] to the proposal about the bed, and took the offered arms of the old soldier and the croupier—the latter having been summoned to show the way. They led me along some passages and up a short flight of stairs into the bedroom which I was to occupy. The ex-brave shook me warmly by the hand; proposed that we should breakfast together the next morning; and then, followed by the croupier, left me for the night.

I couldn’t think or feel anything, except for the urge to lie down somewhere right away and drift off into a cool, refreshing, comfortable sleep. So I eagerly agreed to the suggestion about the bed and took the offered arms of the old soldier and the croupier—the latter having been called to show me the way. They guided me through some hallways and up a short flight of stairs into the bedroom that I was going to use. The former soldier shook my hand warmly, suggested we have breakfast together the next morning, and then, followed by the croupier, left me for the night.

I ran to the wash-hand stand; drank some of the water in my jug; poured the rest out, and plunged my face into it—then sat down in a chair, and tried to compose myself. I soon felt better. The change for my lungs, from the fetid atmosphere of the gambling-room to the cool air of the apartment I now occupied; the almost equally refreshing change for my eyes, from the glaring gas-lights of the "Salon" to the dim, quiet flicker of one bedroom candle; aided wonderfully the restorative effects of cold water. The giddiness left me, and I began to feel a little like a reasonable being again. My first thought was of the risk of sleeping all night in a gambling-house; my second, of the still greater risk of trying to get out after the house was closed, and of going home alone at night, through the streets of Paris, with a large sum of money about me. I had slept in worse places than this, in the course of my travels; so I determined to lock, bolt, and barricade my door.

I rushed to the sink, drank some water from my jug, poured the rest out, and splashed my face with it—then I sat down in a chair and tried to calm myself. I started to feel better. The fresh air from the gambling room into the coolness of the apartment I was now in was a relief for my lungs; the equally refreshing change for my eyes from the harsh gaslights of the "Salon" to the soft flicker of a single bedroom candle was also incredibly helpful in restoring me with the cold water. The dizziness faded, and I started to feel somewhat like a rational person again. My first thought was about the danger of sleeping all night in a gambling house; my second was the even greater risk of trying to leave after the house shut down and going home alone at night through the streets of Paris with a lot of money on me. I had slept in worse places during my travels, so I decided to lock, bolt, and barricade my door.

Accordingly, I secured myself against all intrusion; looked under the bed, and into the cupboard; tried the fastening of the window; and then, satisfied that I had taken every proper precaution, pulled off my upper clothing, put my light, which was a dim one, on the hearth among a feathery litter of wood ashes; and got into bed, with the handkerchief full of money under my pillow.

Accordingly, I made sure I was protected from any intrusion; I looked under the bed and checked the cupboard; I tested the window lock; and then, confident that I had taken every reasonable precaution, I took off my outer clothes, placed my dim light on the hearth among a fluffy pile of wood ashes, and climbed into bed, with the handkerchief full of money under my pillow.

I soon felt, not only that I could not go to sleep, but that I could not even close my eyes. I was wide awake, and in a high fever. Every nerve in my body trembled—every one of my senses seemed to be preternaturally sharpened. I tossed, and rolled, and tried every kind of position, and perseveringly sought out the cold corners of the bed, and all to no purpose. Now, I thrust my arms over the clothes; now, I poked them under the clothes; now, I violently shot my legs straight out, down to the bottom of the bed; now, I convulsively coiled them up as near my chin as they would go; now, I shook out my crumpled pillow, changed it to the cool side, patted it flat, and lay down quietly on my back; now, I fiercely doubled it in two, set it up on end, thrust it against the board of the bed, and tried a sitting posture. Every effort was in vain; I groaned with vexation, as I felt that I was in for a sleepless night.

I soon realized that I couldn’t fall asleep, and I couldn't even close my eyes. I was wide awake and had a high fever. Every nerve in my body was trembling—each of my senses felt unnaturally heightened. I tossed and turned, trying every position, desperately searching for the cool spots on the bed, all to no avail. I would throw my arms out from under the covers; then I’d tuck them back in; next, I’d kick my legs straight out to the bottom of the bed; then I’d curl them up as close to my chin as possible; at one point, I shook out my wrinkled pillow, flipped it to the cool side, flattened it out, and lay quietly on my back; then I aggressively folded it in half, propped it up against the bed’s board, and tried sitting up. Every attempt was pointless; I groaned in frustration, knowing I was in for a sleepless night.

What could I do? I had no book to read. And yet, unless I found out some method of diverting my mind, I felt certain that I was in the condition to imagine all sorts of horrors; to rack my brains with forebodings of every possible and impossible danger; in short, to pass the night in suffering all conceivable varieties of nervous terror.[Pg 114] I raised myself on my elbow, and looked about the room—which was brightened by a lovely moonlight pouring straight through the window—to see if it contained any pictures or ornaments, that I could at all clearly distinguish. While my eyes wandered from wall to wall, a remembrance of Le Maistre's delightful little book, "Voyage autour de ma Chambre," occurred to me. I resolved to imitate the French author, and find occupation and amusement enough to relieve the tedium of my wakefulness by making a mental inventory of every article of furniture I could see, and by following up to their sources the multitude of associations which even a chair, a table, or a wash-hand stand, may be made to call forth.

What could I do? I had no book to read. And yet, unless I found a way to distract myself, I was sure I would start imagining all sorts of horrors; I'd drive myself crazy with thoughts of every possible and impossible danger; in short, I’d spend the night suffering from all kinds of nervous terror.[Pg 114] I propped myself up on my elbow and looked around the room, which was illuminated by beautiful moonlight streaming through the window, to see if there were any pictures or decorations that I could clearly make out. As my eyes scanned the walls, I remembered Le Maistre's charming little book, "Voyage autour de ma Chambre." I decided to follow the French author’s lead and keep myself occupied and entertained enough to ease the boredom of my wakefulness by mentally cataloging every piece of furniture I could see, and by exploring the countless associations that even a chair, a table, or a washstand can evoke.

In the nervous, unsettled state of my mind at that moment, I found it much easier to make my proposed inventory, than to make my proposed reflections, and soon gave up all hope of thinking in Le Maistre's fanciful track—or, indeed, thinking at all. I looked about the room at the different articles of furniture, and did nothing more. There was, first, the bed I was lying in—a four-post bed, of all things in the world to meet with in Paris!—yes, a thorough clumsy British four-poster, with the regular top lined with chintz—the regular fringed valance all round—the regular stifling, unwholesome curtains, which I remembered having mechanically drawn back against the posts, without particularly noticing the bed when I first got into the room. Then, there was the marble-topped wash-hand stand, from which the water I had spilt, in my hurry to pour it out, was still dripping, slowly and more slowly, on to the brick floor. Then, two small chairs, with my coat, waistcoat, and trowsers flung on them. Then, a large elbow chair covered with dirty-white dimity: with my cravat and shirt-collar thrown over the back. Then, a chest of drawers, with two of the brass handles off, and a tawdry, broken china inkstand placed on it by way of ornament for the top. Then, the dressing-table, adorned by a very small looking-glass, and a very large pincushion. Then, the window—an unusually large window. Then, a dark old picture, which the feeble candle dimly showed me. It was the picture of a fellow in a high Spanish hat, crowned with a plume of towering feathers. A swarthy sinister ruffian, looking upward; shading his eyes with his hand, and looking intently upward—it might be at some tall gallows at which he was going to be hanged. At any rate he had the appearance of thoroughly deserving it.

In the anxious, unsettled state of my mind at that moment, I found it much easier to take stock of my surroundings than to reflect thoughtfully, and soon gave up all hope of thinking in Le Maistre's imaginative way—or even thinking at all. I looked around the room at the various pieces of furniture and did nothing else. First, there was the bed I was lying on—a four-poster bed, of all things to find in Paris!—yes, a clunky British four-poster, with the standard top lined with chintz—the usual fringed valance all around—the typical stifling, unhealthy curtains, which I remembered having automatically pulled back against the posts without really noticing the bed when I first entered the room. Then, there was the marble-topped washstand, from which the water I had spilled in my rush to pour it out was still dripping, slowly and then more slowly, onto the brick floor. Next, two small chairs, with my coat, waistcoat, and trousers tossed on them. Then, a large armchair covered in dirty-white dimity, with my cravat and shirt collar draped over the back. After that, a chest of drawers, with two of the brass handles missing, and a flashy, broken china inkstand placed on it as a decoration for the top. Then, the dressing table, featuring a tiny mirror and a large pincushion. Following that, the window—an unusually large window. Lastly, an old dark picture, which the faint candle light illuminated dimly. It depicted a man in a tall Spanish hat, adorned with a plume of towering feathers. A shady, sinister guy, looking up; shading his eyes with his hand, and staring intently upwards—it might be at some tall gallows where he was about to be hanged. In any case, he certainly looked like he deserved it.

This picture put a kind of constraint upon me to look upward, too—at the top of the bed. It was a gloomy and not an interesting object, and I looked back at the picture. I counted the feathers in the man's hat; they stood out in relief; three, white; two, green. I observed the crown of his hat, which was of a conical shape, according to the fashion supposed to have been favored by Guido Fawkes. I wondered what he was looking up at. It couldn't be at the stars; such a desperado was neither astrologer nor[Pg 115] astronomer. It must be at the high gallows, and he was going to be hanged presently. Would the executioner come into possession of his conical crowned hat, and plume of feathers? I counted the feathers again; three, white; two, green.

This picture made me feel like I had to look upwards too—at the top of the bed. It was a dark and boring object, so I glanced back at the picture. I counted the feathers in the man's hat; they popped out clearly; three were white, and two were green. I noticed the crown of his hat, which had a cone shape, following the style thought to be liked by Guy Fawkes. I wondered what he was gazing up at. It couldn’t be at the stars; a guy like that was neither an astrologer nor an astronomer. It had to be at the high gallows, and he was about to be hanged. Would the executioner take his conically crowned hat and feathers? I counted the feathers again: three, white; two, green.

While I still lingered over this very improving and intellectual employment, my thoughts insensibly began to wander. The moonlight shining into the room reminded me of a certain moonlight night in England—the night after a pic-nic party in a Welsh valley. Every incident of the drive homeward through lovely scenery, which the moonlight made lovelier than ever, came back to my remembrance, though I had never given the pic-nic a thought for years; though, if I had tried to recollect it, I could certainly have recalled little or nothing of that scene long past. Of all the wonderful faculties that help to tell us we are immortal, which speaks the sublime truth more eloquently than memory? Here was I, in a strange house of the most suspicious character, in a situation of uncertainty, and even of peril, which might seem to make the cool exercise of my recollection almost out of the question; nevertheless remembering, quite involuntarily, places, people, conversations, minute circumstances of every kind, which I had thought forgotten forever, which I could not possibly have recalled at will, even under the most favorable auspices. And what cause had produced in a moment the whole of this strange, complicated, mysterious effect? Nothing but some rays of moonlight shining in at my bedroom window.

While I was still absorbed in this enriching and intellectual pursuit, my thoughts started to drift. The moonlight streaming into the room reminded me of a particular moonlit night in England—the night after a picnic in a Welsh valley. Every detail of the drive home through beautiful scenery, made even more enchanting by the moonlight, returned to my mind, even though I hadn't thought about the picnic in years; in fact, if I had tried to remember it, I probably wouldn’t have been able to recall much, if anything, from that long-ago event. Of all the amazing abilities that remind us of our immortality, which conveys the profound truth more powerfully than memory? Here I was, in a strange house with a dubious atmosphere, in a situation filled with uncertainty and even danger, which might have made it hard to think clearly; yet I found myself involuntarily recalling places, people, conversations, and countless details that I thought I had forgotten forever, and which I couldn't have brought to mind at will, even in the best circumstances. And what could have triggered this strange, complex, mysterious effect in an instant? Just some beams of moonlight coming through my bedroom window.

I was still thinking of the pic-nic; of our merriment on the drive home; of the sentimental young lady, who would quote Childe Harold because it was moonlight. I was absorbed by these past scenes and past amusements, when, in an instant, the thread on which my memories hung, snapped asunder; my attention immediately came back to present things more vividly than ever, and I found myself, I neither knew why or wherefore, looking hard at the picture again.

I was still thinking about the picnic; about our fun on the drive home; about the sentimental young woman who would quote Childe Harold just because it was moonlight. I was lost in those old memories and past joys when, in a moment, the thread holding my memories together broke; my focus snapped back to the present more clearly than ever, and I found myself, for reasons I couldn't understand, staring at the picture again.

Looking for what? Good God, the man had pulled his hat down on his brows!—No! The hat itself was gone! Where was the conical crown? Where the feathers; three, white; two green? Not there! In place of the hat and feathers, what dusky object was it that now hid his forehead—his eyes—his shading hand? Was the bed moving?

Looking for what? Good grief, the guy had pulled his hat down over his eyes!—No! The hat itself was gone! Where was the pointy crown? Where were the feathers; three white; two green? Not there! Instead of the hat and feathers, what dark object was now covering his forehead—his eyes—his shielding hand? Was the bed moving?

I turned on my back, and looked up. Was I mad? drunk? dreaming? giddy again? or, was the top of the bed really moving down—sinking slowly, regularly, silently, horribly, right down throughout the whole of its length and breadth—right down upon me, as I lay underneath?

I rolled onto my back and looked up. Was I going crazy? drunk? dreaming? feeling dizzy again? Or was the top of the bed actually moving down—sinking slowly, evenly, silently, and terrifyingly—right down over me as I lay underneath?

My blood seemed to stand still; a deadly paralyzing coldness stole all over me, as I turned my head round on the pillow, and determined to test whether the bed-top was really moving or not, by keeping my eye on the man in the picture. The next look in that direction was[Pg 116] enough. The dull, black, frowsy outline of the valance above me was within an inch of being parallel with his waist. I still looked breathlessly. And steadily, and slowly—very slowly—I saw the figure, and the line of frame below the figure, vanish, as the valance moved down before it.

My blood felt like it had frozen; a chilling, paralyzing cold swept over me as I turned my head on the pillow, deciding to check if the bed was really moving or not by focusing on the man in the picture. The next glance in that direction was[Pg 116] telling. The dull, dark, frumpy outline of the valance above me was almost parallel to his waist. I kept watching, breathless. Gradually, and very slowly, I saw the figure and the line of the frame below it fade away as the valance moved down in front of it.

I am, constitutionally, any thing but timid. I have been, on more than one occasion, in peril of my life, and have not lost my self-possession for an instant; but, when the conviction first settled on my mind that the bed-top was really moving, was steadily and continuously sinking down upon me, I looked up for one awful minute, or more, shuddering, helpless, panic-stricken, beneath the hideous machinery for murder, which was advancing closer and closer to suffocate me where I lay.

I’m definitely not the shy type. I’ve faced life-threatening situations more than once and stayed calm throughout. But when it first hit me that the bed was actually moving, slowly and steadily sinking down toward me, I looked up for what felt like a terrifying minute, or longer, shaking, powerless, and panicking under the horrifying device designed to kill, which was inching closer and closer to smother me where I was lying.

Then the instinct of self-preservation came, and nerved me to save my life, while there was yet time. I got out of bed very quietly, and quickly dressed myself again in my upper clothing. The candle, fully spent, went out. I sat down in the arm-chair that stood near, and watched the bed-top slowly descending. I was literally spell-bound by it. If I had heard footsteps behind me, I could not have turned round; if a means of escape had been miraculously provided for me, I could not have moved to take advantage of it. The whole life in me, was, at that moment, concentrated in my eyes.

Then the instinct to survive kicked in, pushing me to save my life while I still could. I got out of bed quietly and quickly put my upper clothes back on. The candle, completely burned out, extinguished itself. I sat down in the nearby armchair and watched the bed slowly sink. I was completely entranced by it. If I had heard footsteps behind me, I couldn't have turned around; if a way to escape had miraculously appeared, I couldn't have moved to take it. In that moment, all my energy was focused in my eyes.

It descended—the whole canopy, with the fringe round it, came down—down—close down; so close that there was not room now to squeeze my finger between the bed-top and the bed. I felt at the sides, and discovered that what had appeared to me, from beneath, to be the ordinary light canopy of a four-post bed was in reality a thick, broad mattress, the substance of which was concealed by the valance and its fringe. I looked up, and saw the four posts rising hideously bare. In the middle of the bed-top was a huge wooden screw that had evidently worked it down through a hole in the ceiling, just as ordinary presses are worked down on the substance selected for compression. The frightful apparatus moved without making the faintest noise. There had been no creaking as it came down; there was now not the faintest sound from the room above. Amid a dead and awful silence I beheld before me—in the nineteenth century, and in the civilized capital of France—such a machine for secret murder by suffocation, as might have existed in the worst days of the Inquisition, in the lonely Inns among the Hartz Mountains, in the mysterious tribunals of Westphalia! Still, as I looked on it, I could not move; I could hardly breathe; but I began to recover the power of thinking; and, in a moment, I discovered the murderous conspiracy framed against me, in all its horror.

It came down—the whole canopy, with its trim, lowered—lowered—so low that there was barely enough space to squeeze my finger between the bed and the mattress. I felt along the sides and realized that what had looked like a regular light canopy of a four-poster bed was actually a thick, broad mattress, its substance hidden by the valance and its fringe. I looked up and saw the four posts standing shockingly bare. In the center of the bed frame was a massive wooden screw that had clearly pushed it down through a hole in the ceiling, just like regular presses compress the material being used. The horrifying mechanism moved without making the slightest noise. There hadn't been any creaking as it descended; there was now not a single sound coming from the room above. In the dead and dreadful silence, I witnessed before me—in the nineteenth century, in the civilized capital of France—such a device for secret murder by suffocation that might have been seen in the darkest days of the Inquisition, in the remote inns of the Hartz Mountains, in the secret courts of Westphalia! Yet, as I stared at it, I couldn’t move; I could barely breathe; but I started to regain my ability to think; and soon, I uncovered the deadly conspiracy plotted against me, in all its horror.

My cup of coffee had been drugged, and drugged too strongly. I had been saved from being smothered, by having taken an over-dose of some narcotic. How I had chafed and fretted at the fever fit which had preserved my life by keeping[Pg 117] me awake! How recklessly I had confided myself to the two wretches who had led me into this room, determined, for the sake of my winnings, to kill me in my sleep, by the surest and most horrible contrivance for secretly accomplishing my destruction! How many men, winners like me, had slept, as I had proposed to sleep, in that bed; and never been seen or heard of more! I shuddered as I thought of it.

My coffee had been drugged, and it was way too strong. I had been saved from being smothered after taking an overdose of some narcotic. I was frustrated and anxious about the fever fit that had kept me alive by preventing me from sleeping! How carelessly I had trusted those two scoundrels who had brought me into this room, intent on killing me in my sleep for the sake of my winnings, using the surest and most horrific method to secretly carry out my demise! How many men, winners like me, had slept in that bed as I had planned to; and never been seen or heard from again! I shuddered at the thought.

But, erelong, all thought was again suspended by the sight of the murderous canopy moving once more. After it had remained on the bed—as nearly as I could guess—about ten minutes, it began to move up again. The villains, who worked it from above, evidently believed that their purpose was now accomplished. Slowly and silently, as it had descended, that horrible bed-top rose toward its former place. When it reached the upper extremities of the four posts, it reached the ceiling too. Neither hole nor screw could be seen—the bed became in appearance, an ordinary bed again, the canopy, an ordinary canopy, even to the most suspicious eyes.

But soon, all thought was interrupted again by the sight of the deadly canopy moving once more. After it had been on the bed—for about ten minutes, as far as I could tell—it started to move up again. The criminals operating it from above clearly thought their goal had been achieved. Slowly and silently, just like it had come down, that awful bed-top rose back to its original position. When it reached the top of the four posts, it touched the ceiling too. There was no hole or screw visible—the bed looked normal again, the canopy looked ordinary, even to the most suspicious observers.

Now, for the first time, I was able to move, to rise from my chair, to consider of how I should escape. If I betrayed by the smallest noise, that the attempt to suffocate me had failed, I was certain to be murdered. Had I made any noise already? I listened intently, looking toward the door. No! no footsteps in the passage outside; no sound of a tread, light or heavy, in the room above—absolute silence every where. Besides locking and bolting my door, I had moved an old wooden chest against it, which I had found under the bed. To remove this chest (my blood ran cold, as I thought what its contents might be!) without making some disturbance, was impossible; and, moreover, to think of escaping through the house, now barred-up for the night, was sheer insanity. Only one chance was left me—the window. I stole to it on tiptoe.

Now, for the first time, I could move, get up from my chair, and think about how I could escape. If I made even the slightest noise that revealed the attempt to suffocate me had failed, I knew I would be killed. Had I already made any noise? I listened closely, glancing toward the door. No! No footsteps in the hallway outside; no sound of anyone walking, whether light or heavy, in the room above—absolute silence everywhere. Besides locking and bolting my door, I had pushed an old wooden chest against it that I found under the bed. It would be impossible to move this chest (my blood ran cold at the thought of what it might contain!) without making a racket, and thinking about escaping through the house, now locked up for the night, was pure madness. I had only one option left—the window. I crept toward it on tiptoe.

My bedroom was on the first floor, above an entresol, and looked into the back street, which you had sketched in your view. I raised my hand to open the window, knowing that on that action hung, by the merest hair's-breadth, my chance of safety. They keep vigilant watch in a House of Murder—if any part of the frame cracked, if the hinge creaked, I was, perhaps, a lost man! It must have occupied me at least five minutes, reckoning by time—five hours, reckoning by suspense—to open that window. I succeeded in doing it silently, in doing it with all the dexterity of a house-breaker; and then looked down into the street. To leap the distance beneath me, would be almost certain destruction! Next, I looked round at the sides of the house. Down the left side, ran the thick water-pipe which you have drawn—it passed close by the outer edge of the window. The moment I saw the pipe, I knew I was saved; my breath came and went freely for the first time since I had seen the canopy of the bed moving down upon me!

My bedroom was on the first floor, above a mezzanine, and overlooked the back street, which you had sketched in your drawing. I raised my hand to open the window, knowing that my chance of safety hung by the tiniest thread. They keep a close watch in a House of Murder—if any part of the frame cracked, if the hinge creaked, I could be a lost man! It must have taken me at least five minutes, timing it out—five hours, measuring it by suspense—to open that window. I managed to do it silently, with all the skill of a burglar; then I looked down into the street. Jumping the distance below would almost certainly lead to disaster! Next, I scanned the sides of the house. Down the left side was the thick water pipe you had drawn—it passed right by the outer edge of the window. The moment I saw the pipe, I knew I was saved; I could finally breathe freely for the first time since I saw the bed canopy coming down towards me!

To some men the means of escape which I had discovered might have seemed difficult and dangerous enough—to me, the prospect of slipping[Pg 118] down the pipe into the street did not suggest even a thought of peril. I had always been accustomed, by the practice of gymnastics, to keep up my schoolboy powers as a daring and expert climber; and knew that my head, hands, and feet would serve me faithfully in any hazards of ascent or descent. I had already got one leg over the window-sill, when I remembered the handkerchief, filled with money, under my pillow. I could well have afforded to leave it behind me; but I was revengefully determined that the miscreants of the gambling-house should miss their plunder as well as their victim. So I went back to the bed, and tied the heavy handkerchief at my back by my cravat. Just as I had made it tight, and fixed it in a comfortable place, I thought I heard a sound of breathing outside the door. The chill feeling of horror ran through me again as I listened. No! dead silence still in the passage—I had only heard the night air blowing softly into the room. The next moment I was on the window-sill—and the next, I had a firm grip on the water-pipe with my hands and knees.

To some guys, the escape route I found might have seemed pretty tough and risky—but to me, sliding down the pipe into the street didn't seem dangerous at all. I had always kept in shape from gymnastics, so I was a confident and skilled climber; I knew my head, hands, and feet would handle any risks of going up or down. I had already gotten one leg over the window-sill when I remembered the handkerchief stuffed with money under my pillow. I could have easily left it behind, but out of spite, I wanted the scoundrels from the gambling house to miss their loot as well as their victim. So, I went back to the bed and tied the heavy handkerchief to my back with my cravat. Just as I secured it tightly and got it comfortable, I thought I heard someone breathing outside the door. A chill of fear ran through me again as I listened. No! It was dead silent in the hallway—I had just heard the night air softly blowing into the room. The next moment, I was on the window-sill—and then, I had a solid grip on the water pipe with my hands and knees.

I slid down into the street easily and quietly, as I thought I should, and immediately set off, at the top of my speed, to a branch "Prefecture" of Police, which I knew was situated in the immediate neighborhood. A "Sub-Prefect" and several picked men among his subordinates, happened to be up, maturing, I believe, some scheme for discovering the perpetrator of a mysterious murder, which all Paris was talking of just then. When I began my story, in a breathless hurry and in very bad French, I could see that the Sub-Prefect suspected me of being a drunken Englishman, who had robbed somebody, but he soon altered his opinion, as I went on; and before I had any thing like concluded, he shoved all the papers before him into a drawer, put on his hat, supplied me with another (for I was bare-headed), ordered a file of soldiers, desired his expert followers to get ready all sorts of tools for breaking open doors and ripping up brick-flooring, and took my arm, in the most friendly and familiar manner possible, to lead me with him out of the house. I will venture to say, that when the Sub-Prefect was a little boy, and was taken for the first time to the Play, he was not half as much pleased as he was now at the job in prospect for him at the "Gambling-House!"

I slipped down into the street easily and quietly, as I thought I should, and immediately took off at full speed to a nearby Police "Prefecture" that I knew was close by. A "Sub-Prefect" and several of his chosen officers happened to be up, likely working on a plan to find out who committed a mysterious murder that everyone in Paris was talking about at the time. When I started telling my story, out of breath and speaking terrible French, I could see the Sub-Prefect thought I was just a drunken Englishman who had robbed someone. But he quickly changed his mind as I continued; before I was even close to finishing, he shoved all the papers on his desk into a drawer, put on his hat, gave me another one (since I was bare-headed), called for a group of soldiers, instructed his skilled team to gather all sorts of tools for breaking down doors and ripping up floorboards, and took my arm in the friendliest way possible to lead me out of the building. I bet that when the Sub-Prefect was a little boy and first went to the theater, he wasn't half as excited as he was about the job awaiting him at the "Gambling-House!"

Away we went through the streets, the Sub-Prefect cross-examining and congratulating me in the same breath, as we marched at the head of our formidable posse comitatus. Sentinels were placed at the back and front of the gambling-house the moment we got to it; a tremendous battery of knocks were directed against the door; a light appeared at a window; I waited to conceal myself behind the police—then came more knocks, and a cry of "Open in the name of the law!" At that terrible summons, bolts and locks gave way before an invisible hand, and the moment after, the Sub-Prefect was in the passage, confronting a waiter, half-dressed[Pg 119] and ghastly pale. This was the short dialogue which immediately took place:

Away we went through the streets, the Sub-Prefect questioning and congratulating me at the same time as we marched at the front of our impressive posse comitatus. Guards were stationed at the back and front of the gambling house as soon as we arrived; a loud series of knocks echoed against the door; a light appeared in a window; I waited to hide behind the police—then came more knocks, followed by a shout of "Open in the name of the law!" At that fierce demand, bolts and locks gave way to an unseen force, and moments later, the Sub-Prefect was in the hallway, facing a half-dressed, pale waiter. This was the brief dialogue that immediately took place:

"We want to see the Englishman who is sleeping in this house?"

"We want to see the Englishman who is sleeping in this house?"

"He went away hours ago."

"He left hours ago."

"He did no such thing. His friend went away; he remained. Show us to his bedroom!"

"He didn't do that at all. His friend left; he stayed. Show us to his bedroom!"

"I swear to you, Monsieur le Sous-Préfet, he is not here! he—"

"I promise you, Mr. Deputy Prefect, he isn't here! He—"

"I swear to you, Monsieur le Garçon, he is. He slept here—he didn't find your bed comfortable—he came to us to complain of it—here he is, among my men—and here am I, ready to look for a flea or two in his bedstead. Picard! (calling to one of the subordinates, and pointing to the waiter) collar that man, and tie his hands behind him. Now, then, gentlemen, let us walk up-stairs!"

"I swear to you, Mister Waiter, he is. He slept here—he didn't find your bed comfortable—he came to us to complain about it—here he is, among my guys—and here I am, ready to look for a flea or two in his bed. Picard! (calling to one of the subordinates, and pointing to the waiter) grab that guy and tie his hands behind his back. Now, then, gentlemen, let's head upstairs!"

Every man and woman in the house was secured—the "Old Soldier," the first. Then I identified the bed in which I had slept; and then we went into the room above. No object that was at all extraordinary appeared in any part of it. The Sub-Prefect looked round the place, commanded every body to be silent, stamped twice on the floor, called for a candle, looked attentively at the spot he had stamped on, and ordered the flooring there to be carefully taken up. This was done in no time. Lights were produced, and we saw a deep raftered cavity between the floor of this room and the ceiling of the room beneath. Through this cavity there ran perpendicularly a sort of case of iron, thickly greased; and inside the case appeared the screw, which communicated with the bed-top below. Extra lengths of screw, freshly oiled—levers covered with felt—all the complete upper works of a heavy press, constructed with infernal ingenuity so as to join the fixtures below—and, when taken to pieces again, to go into the smallest possible compass, were next discovered, and pulled out on the floor. After some little difficulty, the Sub-Prefect succeeded in putting the machinery together, and, leaving his men to work it, descended with me to the bedroom. The smothering canopy was then lowered, but not so noiselessly as I had seen it lowered. When I mentioned this to the Sub-Prefect, his answer, simple as it was, had a terrible significance. "My men," said he, "are working down the bed-top for the first time—the men whose money you won, were in better practice."

Every guy and girl in the house was secured—the "Old Soldier" first. Then I recognized the bed where I had slept, and we moved into the room above. Nothing out of the ordinary was visible in any part of it. The Sub-Prefect glanced around, told everyone to be quiet, stomped twice on the floor, asked for a candle, focused intently on the spot he had stamped, and ordered the flooring to be carefully removed. This was done quickly. Lights were brought in, and we saw a deep, raftered cavity between the floor of this room and the ceiling of the room below. In this cavity was a sort of iron casing, heavily greased; and inside the casing was the screw that connected to the bed-top below. Extra lengths of screw, recently oiled—felt-covered levers—all the complete upper mechanism of a heavy press, cleverly built to connect with the fixtures below—and, when taken apart, to fold into the smallest possible size, were then discovered and pulled out onto the floor. After a bit of trouble, the Sub-Prefect managed to reassemble the machinery and left his men to operate it while he came back down to the bedroom with me. The heavy canopy was then lowered, but not as quietly as I had seen it done before. When I pointed this out to the Sub-Prefect, his response, though simple, carried a chilling weight. "My men," he said, "are working on the bed-top for the first time—the men whose money you won were more experienced."

We left the house in the sole possession of two police agents—every one of the inmates being removed to prison on the spot, The Sub-Prefect, after taking down my "procès-verbal" in his office, returned with me to my hotel to get my passport. "Do you think," I asked, as I gave it to him, "that any men have really been smothered in that bed, as they tried to smother me?"

We left the house with just two police officers in charge—everyone else was taken to jail right away. The Sub-Prefect, after recording my "procès-verbal" in his office, came back with me to my hotel to retrieve my passport. "Do you think," I asked as I handed it to him, "that anyone has really been smothered in that bed, like they tried to smother me?"

"I have seen dozens of drowned men laid out at the Morgue," answered the Sub-Prefect, "in whose pocket-books were found letters, stating that they had committed suicide in the Seine, because they had lost every thing at the gaming-table.[Pg 120] Do I know how many of those men entered the same gambling-house that you entered? won as you won? took that bed as you took it? slept in it? were smothered in it? and were privately thrown into the river, with a letter of explanation written by the murderers and placed in their pocket-books? No man can say how many, or how few, have suffered the fate from which you have escaped. The people of the gambling-house kept their bedstead machinery a secret from us—even from the police! The dead kept the rest of the secret for them. Good-night, or rather good-morning, Monsieur Faulkner! Be at my office again at nine o'clock—in the mean time, au revoir!"

"I've seen countless drowned men laid out at the morgue," the Sub-Prefect replied, "and in their wallets, we found letters saying they had committed suicide in the Seine because they lost everything at the gambling table.[Pg 120] Do I know how many of those men walked into the same gambling house you did? Won like you won? Took that bed like you took it? Slept in it? Were suffocated in it? And were secretly dumped into the river, with a note written by their killers tucked in their wallets? No one can say how many, or how few, have met the same fate you’ve managed to avoid. The gambling house kept their bed mechanisms hidden from us—even from the police! The dead kept the rest of the secret for them. Good night, or rather, good morning, Monsieur Faulkner! Be at my office again at nine o'clock—in the meantime, au revoir!"

The rest of my story is soon told. I was examined, and re-examined; the gambling-house was strictly searched all through, from top to bottom; the prisoners were separately interrogated; and two of the less guilty among them made a confession. I discovered that the Old Soldier was the master of the gambling-house—justice discovered that he had been drummed out of the army, as a vagabond, years ago; that he had been guilty of all sorts of villainies since; that he was in possession of stolen property, which the owners identified; and that he, the croupier, another accomplice, and the woman who had made my cup of coffee, were all in the secret of the bedstead. There appeared some reason to doubt whether the inferior persons attached to the house knew any thing of the suffocating machinery; and they received the benefit of that doubt, by being treated simply as thieves and vagabonds. As for the Old Soldier and his two head-myrmidons, they went to the galleys; the woman who had drugged my coffee was imprisoned for I forget how many years; the regular attendants at the gambling-house were considered "suspicious," and placed under "surveillance"; and I became, for one whole week (which is a long time), the head "lion" in Parisian society. My adventure was dramatized by three illustrious playmakers, but never saw theatrical daylight; for the censorship forbade the introduction on the stage of a correct copy of the gambling-house bedstead.

The rest of my story is quickly told. I was examined and re-examined; the gambling house was thoroughly searched from top to bottom; the prisoners were questioned separately; and two of the less guilty among them confessed. I found out that the Old Soldier was the owner of the gambling house—justice discovered that he had been kicked out of the army as a vagrant years ago; that he had been involved in all sorts of crimes since then; that he was in possession of stolen property, which the owners identified; and that he, the croupier, another accomplice, and the woman who made my cup of coffee were all in on the secret of the bedstead. There seemed to be some doubt about whether the lesser staff at the house knew anything about the suffocating machinery; they were given the benefit of that doubt and treated simply as thieves and vagrants. As for the Old Soldier and his two main assistants, they were sent to the galleys; the woman who had drugged my coffee was imprisoned for a number of years I can’t recall; the regular patrons of the gambling house were labeled "suspicious" and placed under "surveillance"; and I became, for a whole week (which is a long time), the main "celebrity" in Parisian society. My adventure was dramatized by three famous playwrights but never saw the stage; the censorship prohibited the correct depiction of the gambling house bedstead on stage.

Two good results were produced by my adventure, which any censorship must have approved. In the first place, it helped to justify the government in forthwith carrying out their determination to put down all gambling-houses; in the second place, it cured me of ever again trying "Rouge et Noir" as an amusement. The sight of a green cloth, with packs of cards and heaps of money on it, will henceforth be forever associated in my mind with the sight of a bed-canopy descending to suffocate me, in the silence and darkness of the night.

Two positive outcomes came from my adventure, which any censor would have approved. First, it justified the government’s decision to quickly shut down all gambling houses. Second, it made sure I would never consider "Rouge et Noir" as a pastime again. From now on, the sight of a green table with stacks of cards and piles of cash will always remind me of a bed canopy coming down to suffocate me in the silence and darkness of night.

Just as Mr. Faulkner pronounced the last words, he started in his chair, and assumed a stiff, dignified position, in a great hurry. "Bless my soul!" cried he—with a comic look of astonishment and vexation—"while I have been telling you what is the real secret of my interest in the sketch you have so kindly given to me, I have[Pg 121] altogether forgotten that I came here to sit for my portrait. For the last hour, or more, I must have been the worst model you ever had to paint from!"

Just as Mr. Faulkner finished his last words, he jumped in his chair and straightened up, taking on a stiff, dignified stance in a hurry. "Goodness!" he exclaimed—with a funny look of surprise and frustration—"while I’ve been sharing the real reason for my interest in the sketch you so kindly gave me, I completely forgot that I came here to pose for my portrait. For the past hour or so, I've probably been the worst model you've ever had to paint from!"

"On the contrary, you have been the best," said I. "I have been painting from your expression; and, while telling your story, you have unconsciously shown me the natural expression I wanted."

"On the contrary, you've been the best," I said. "I've been painting from your expression; and, while sharing your story, you've unknowingly shown me the natural expression I was looking for."


WHAT THE SUNBEAM DOES.

Heat, or the caloric portion of the sunbeam, is the great cause of life and motion in this our world. As it were with a magical energy, it causes the winds to blow and the waters to flow, vivifies and animates all nature, and then bathes it in refreshing dew. The intensity of the heat which we receive depends on the distance of the earth from the sun, its great source, and still more on the relative position of the two orbs; since in winter we are nearer the sun than we are in summer, yet, in consequence of the position of the earth at that season, the sun's rays fall obliquely on its northern hemisphere, rendering it far colder than at any other period of the year.

Heat, or the warm part of sunlight, is the main driver of life and movement in our world. It acts like a magical force, making the winds blow and the waters flow, bringing life to all nature, and then covering it in refreshing dew. The strength of the heat we receive depends on how far the earth is from the sun, its main source, and even more on the relative positions of the two bodies; because in winter we are closer to the sun than in summer, yet due to the earth's position during that season, the sun's rays hit the northern hemisphere at an angle, making it much colder than at any other time of the year.

A great portion of the heat-rays which are emitted by the sun are absorbed in their passage through the atmosphere which surrounds our globe. It is calculated that about one-third of the heat-rays which fall on it never reach the earth, which fact adds another to the many beneficent purposes fulfilled by our gaseous envelope, screening us from the otherwise scorching heat. It is curious to trace the varied fates of the calorific rays which strike on the surface of the earth. Some at once on falling are reflected, and, passing back through the atmosphere, are lost amid the immensity of space; others are absorbed or imbibed by different bodies, and, after a time, are radiated from them; but the greater part of the beams which reach the earth during the summer are absorbed by it, and conveyed downward to a considerable distance, by conduction from particle to particle. Heat also spreads laterally from the regions of the equator toward the poles, thereby moderating the intense cold of the arctic and antarctic circles, and in winter, when the forest-trees are covered with snow, their deeply-penetrating roots are warmed by the heat, which, as in a vast store-house, has been laid up in the earth, to preserve life during the dreary winter. The rays which fall on the tropical seas descend to the depth of about three hundred feet. The sun's attraction for the earth, being also stronger at that quarter of the world, the heated waters are drawn upward, the colder waters from the poles rush in, and thus a great heated current is produced, flowing from the equator northward and southward, which tends to equalize the temperature of the earth. The sailor also knows how to avail himself of this phenomenon. When out at sea, despite his most skillful steering, he is in constant danger of shipwreck, if he fails to estimate truly the force and direction of those currents which are dragging[Pg 122] him insensibly out of the true course. His compass does not help him here, neither does any log yet known give a perfectly authentic result. But he knows that this great gulf-stream has a stated path and time, and, by testing from hour to hour the temperature of the water through which he is proceeding, he knows at what point he is meeting this current, and reckons accordingly.

A large portion of the heat rays emitted by the sun gets absorbed as they pass through the atmosphere surrounding our planet. It's estimated that about one-third of the heat rays that strike it never reach the earth, which highlights one of the many beneficial roles our atmospheric layer plays in protecting us from extreme heat. It's interesting to follow the different outcomes of the heat rays that hit the earth's surface. Some are immediately reflected back into the atmosphere and lost to the vastness of space; others are absorbed by various surfaces and eventually re-radiated. However, most of the rays that reach the earth during summer are absorbed and transferred downwards through conduction from one particle to another. Heat also spreads sideways from the equator toward the poles, helping to moderate the severe cold in the Arctic and Antarctic regions. In winter, when trees are covered in snow, their deep roots are warmed by heat that's been stored in the earth, helping to sustain life throughout the bleak winter months. The rays that hit tropical seas reach depths of about three hundred feet. The sun's gravitational pull on the earth is stronger in that part of the world, causing the warm waters to rise and drawing in colder waters from the poles, creating a powerful current that flows from the equator toward the north and south, helping to balance the earth's temperature. Sailors are also aware of this phenomenon. When at sea, no matter how skilled he is at steering, a sailor constantly risks shipwreck if he doesn't accurately assess the strength and direction of the currents that are subtly pulling him off course. His compass doesn’t help much, nor does any known log provide perfectly reliable information. But he knows that this major Gulf Stream follows a specific path and schedule, and by checking the water temperature as he navigates, he can determine where he is encountering this current and adjust his course accordingly.

We have already said that heat was the producer of the winds, which are so essential to the preservation of the purity of the atmosphere. In order to understand their action, we shall consider the stupendous phenomenon of the trade-winds, which is similar to that of the current we have described. The rays of the sun falling vertically on the regions between the tropics, the air there becomes much heated. It is the property of air to expand when heated, and, when expanded, it is necessarily lighter than the cooler air around it. Consequently it rises. As it rises, the cooler air at once takes its place. Rushing from the temperate and polar regions to supply the want, the warm air which has risen flows toward the poles, and descends there, loses its heat, and again travels to the tropics. Thus a grand circulation is continually maintained in the atmosphere. These aerial currents, being affected by the revolution of the earth, do not move due north and south, as they otherwise would. Hence, while they equalize the temperature of the atmosphere, they also preserve its purity; for the pure oxygen evolved by the luxuriant vegetation of the equatorial regions is wafted by the winds to support life in the teeming population of the temperate zones, while the air from the poles bears carbonic acid gas on its wings to furnish food for the rich and gorgeous plants of the tropics. Thus the splendid water-lily of the Amazon, the stately palm-tree of Africa, and the great banyan of India, depend for nourishment on the breath of men and animals in lands thousands of miles distant from them, and, in return, they supply their benefactors with vivifying oxygen.

We’ve already mentioned that heat generates the winds, which are essential for keeping the atmosphere clean. To understand how they work, let's look at the impressive phenomenon of the trade winds, which is similar to the current we’ve described. When the sun’s rays hit the areas between the tropics directly, the air there gets really hot. Air expands when heated, and when it expands, it becomes lighter than the cooler air around it. So, it rises. As it rises, cooler air quickly fills its spot. To make up for what’s missing, cooler air from temperate and polar regions rushes in, and the warm air that has risen flows toward the poles, cools down, and then travels back to the tropics. This creates a continuous circulation in the atmosphere. These air currents, influenced by the Earth's rotation, don’t move straight north and south as they otherwise would. Therefore, while they help equalize the temperature of the atmosphere, they also keep it clean; the pure oxygen released by the lush vegetation in the equatorial regions is carried by winds to support life in the densely populated temperate zones, while air from the poles carries carbon dioxide to feed the rich and vibrant plants in the tropics. So, the beautiful water lily of the Amazon, the graceful palm tree of Africa, and the great banyan of India rely on the breath of people and animals from thousands of miles away for nourishment, and in return, they provide their benefactors with life-giving oxygen.

Little less important, and still more beautiful, is the phenomenon of dew, which is produced by the power of radiating heat, possessed in different degrees by all bodies. The powers both of absorbing and of radiating heat, in great measure, depend on the color of bodies—the darker the color, the greater the power; so that each lovely flower bears within its petals a delicate thermometer, which determines the amount of heat each shall receive, and which is always the amount essential to their well-being. The queenly rose, the brilliant carnation, the fair lily, and the many-colored anemone, all basking in the same bright sunshine, enjoy different degrees of warmth, and when night descends, and the heat absorbed by day is radiated back, and bodies become cooler than the surrounding air, the vapor contained in the atmosphere is deposited in the form of dew. Those bodies which radiate most quickly receive the most copious supply of the refreshing fluid. This radiating power depends on the condition of the surface, as well as upon[Pg 123] color, so that we may often see the grass garden bathed in dew, while the gravel walks which run through it are perfectly dry, and, again, the smooth, shining, juicy leaves of the laurel are quite dry, while the rose-tree beneath it is saturated with moisture.

A little less significant, but even more beautiful, is the phenomenon of dew, which is created by the ability of objects to radiate heat, varying in degrees. The ability to absorb and radiate heat largely depends on the object's color—the darker the color, the greater the ability. Each lovely flower has a delicate thermometer within its petals that determines how much heat it receives, which is always the amount necessary for its health. The regal rose, the vibrant carnation, the pure lily, and the multi-colored anemone, all enjoying the same bright sunlight, experience different levels of warmth. When night falls and the heat absorbed during the day is released, causing objects to cool down more than the surrounding air, the moisture in the atmosphere condenses into dew. Those objects that radiate heat the fastest receive the most abundant supply of this refreshing liquid. This radiating ability depends on both the surface condition and color, which is why we often see the grassy garden covered in dew while the gravel paths running through it are completely dry. Additionally, the smooth, shiny, juicy leaves of the laurel may be perfectly dry while the rose bush underneath is soaked with moisture.

The great effect produced on the vegetable kingdom by the heat-rays may be judged of from the fact, that almost all the plants which exhibit the remarkable phenomena of irritability, almost approaching to animal life, are confined to those regions where the heat is extreme. On the banks of the Indian rivers grows a plant in almost constant motion. In the hottest of the conservatories at Kew is a curious plant, whose leaflets rise by a succession of little starts. The same house contains Venus's fly-trap. Light seems to have no effect in quickening their movements; but the effect of increased heat is at once seen. They exhibit their remarkable powers most during the still hot nights of an Indian summer.

The significant impact of heat rays on the plant kingdom can be seen in the fact that nearly all the plants displaying remarkable signs of irritability, which is almost similar to animal life, are found only in extremely hot regions. Along the banks of Indian rivers, there's a plant that is almost always in motion. In the hottest conservatories at Kew, there's a fascinating plant whose leaflets move in a series of little jolts. That same space also has a Venus flytrap. Light doesn’t seem to speed up their movements, but the effect of increased heat is instantly noticeable. They show their remarkable abilities most during the calm, hot nights of an Indian summer.

Heat is of essential importance in the production and ripening of fruit. Many trees will not bear fruit in our cold climate, which are most productive in the sunny south. Animal as well as vegetable life is in great measure dependent on heat. Look at the insect tribes. The greater number of them pass their winter in the pupa state. Hidden in some sheltered nook, or buried in the earth, they sleep on, until the warmth of returning spring awakens them to life and happiness; and if, by artificial means, the cold be prolonged, they still sleep on, whereas, if they he exposed to artificial heat, their change is hastened, and butterflies may be seen sporting about the flowers of a hothouse, when their less favored relatives are still wrapped in the deepest slumber. To judge of the influence of heat on the animal and vegetable economy, we need but contrast summer and winter—the one radiant and vocal with life and beauty, the other dark, dreary, and silent.

Heat is crucial for the production and ripening of fruit. Many trees won’t produce fruit in our cold climate, even though they thrive in the sunny South. Both animal and plant life heavily depend on heat. Just look at the insect species. Most of them spend the winter in the pupae stage. They hide in some sheltered spot or burrow in the ground, remaining dormant until the warmth of spring brings them back to life and joy. If the cold is artificially extended, they continue to sleep, but if exposed to artificial heat, their transformation speeds up, and you might see butterflies fluttering around the flowers in a greenhouse while their less fortunate relatives are still deep in slumber. To understand the influence of heat on the animal and plant world, just compare summer and winter—the former is bright and full of life and beauty, while the latter is dark, gloomy, and silent.

The third constituent of the sunbeam is actinism—its property being to produce chemical effects. So long ago as 1556, it was noticed by those strange seekers after impossibilities, the alchemists, that horn silver, exposed to the sunbeam, was blackened by it. This phenomenon contained the germ of those most interesting discoveries which have distinguished the present age; but, in their ardent search for the philosopher's stone and the elixir of life, they overlooked many an effect of their labors which might have led them to important truths.

The third part of sunlight is actinism—its ability to create chemical effects. Back in 1556, those curious alchemists, always chasing the impossible, noticed that horn silver turned black when exposed to sunlight. This discovery was the seed for many fascinating advancements that define our era today; however, in their passionate quest for the philosopher's stone and the elixir of life, they missed many outcomes of their efforts that could have guided them to significant truths.

As yet, the effects of actinism have been more studied in the inanimate than the organic creation. Still, in the vegetable kingdom, its power is known to be of the utmost importance. A seed exposed to the entire sunbeam will not germinate; but bury it in the earth, at a depth sufficient to exclude the light, yet enough to admit actinism, which, like heat, penetrates the earth to some distance, and soon a chemical change will take place; the starch contained in the seed is converted into gum and water, forming the nutriment of the young plant; the tiny root[Pg 124] plunges downward, the slender stem rises to the light, the first leaves, or cotyledons, then unfold, and now fully expand to the light, and a series of chemical changes of a totally different nature commence, which we have before noticed, when speaking of light. Experiments clearly prove that this change is to be attributed to actinism, and not to heat. Glass has been interposed of a dark blue color, which is transparent to actinism, though opaque to light and heat, and germination has been thereby quickened. Gardeners have long known this fact practically, and are accustomed to raise their cuttings under blue shades. There is no doubt that actinism exercises a powerful and beneficent influence on plants during their whole existence, but science has yet to demonstrate its nature; and it is curious to observe that the actinic element is most abundant in the sunbeam in the spring, when its presence is most essential in promoting germination—in summer the luminous rays are in excess, when they are most needed for the formation of woody fibre—and in autumn the heat-rays prevail, and ripen the golden grain and the delicious fruit; in each day the proportions of the different rays vary—in the morning the actinic principle abounds most, at noon the light, and at eventide the heat.

So far, the effects of actinism have been studied more in non-living things than in living beings. However, in the plant kingdom, its power is recognized as extremely important. A seed that is exposed to full sunlight won’t sprout; but if you bury it in the ground, deep enough to block the light but still let actinism in—which, like heat, can penetrate the soil to some extent—then a chemical change will quickly occur. The starch in the seed transforms into gum and water, providing nourishment for the young plant; the small root plunges downward, the slender stem reaches for the light, and the first leaves, or cotyledons, unfold, expanding fully towards the light. This activation triggers a different series of chemical changes, which we’ve discussed before when talking about light. Experiments clearly show that this transformation is due to actinism rather than heat. Glass that is dark blue, transparent to actinism but opaque to light and heat, has been used, which speeds up germination. Gardeners have long known this from experience and commonly grow their cuttings under blue shades. There’s no doubt that actinism has a strong and beneficial influence on plants throughout their life, but science has yet to explain its nature. It's interesting to note that the actinic element is most abundant in sunlight during spring, when it is most critical for germination—while in summer, the luminous rays are in excess, which are needed for wood fiber formation—and in autumn, the heat rays dominate and ripen golden grains and sweet fruits. Throughout the day, the proportions of the different rays vary—in the morning, the actinic rays are most plentiful, at noon it’s the light, and in the evening, it’s the heat.

The influence of actinism on the animal world is not well known; but it is probable that many of the effects hitherto referred to light are in reality due to actinism. It has the strange power of darkening the human skin, causing the deep color of those tribes who inhabit the sunniest regions of the earth; and even in our own country, in summer, that darkening of the skin called sun-burning. Doubtless, more careful investigation will discover this principle to be equally important to the life and health of animals as either of its closely allied powers of light and heat.

The impact of actinism on the animal kingdom isn't well understood, but it's likely that many effects usually attributed to light are actually due to actinism. It has the unusual ability to darken human skin, which leads to the deeper skin tones found in tribes living in the sunniest parts of the world; even in our own country, during the summer, people experience the skin darkening known as sunburn. Surely, more thorough research will reveal that this principle is just as vital to the life and health of animals as its closely related properties of light and heat.

Our knowledge of actinic influence on inanimate nature is not so scanty, for it is now a well established fact, that the sunbeam can not fall on any body, whether simple or compound, without producing on its surface a chemical and molecular change. The immovable rocks which bound our shores, the mountain which rears its lofty head above the clouds, the magnificent cathedral, the very triumph of art, and the beautiful statue in bronze or marble, are all acted on destructively by the sunbeam, and would soon perish beneath its irresistible energy, but for the beautiful provision made for their restoration during the darkness of night—the repose of darkness being no less essential to inorganic, than it is to animated nature. During its silent hours, the chemical and molecular changes are all undone, and the destruction of the day repaired, we know not how.

Our understanding of how sunlight affects inanimate objects is quite substantial. It's now a well-accepted fact that sunlight impacts every material, whether it's simple or complex, leading to chemical and molecular changes on its surface. The solid rocks that line our coasts, the towering mountains that reach above the clouds, the stunning cathedrals, which are masterpieces of art, and the beautiful statues made of bronze or marble are all negatively affected by sunlight. They would quickly deteriorate under its relentless power if it weren't for the amazing process that restores them during the nighttime. Just like living things, inorganic materials also need the quiet darkness to recover. During these peaceful hours, all the chemical and molecular changes are reversed, and the damage caused during the day is somehow repaired.

The art of painting by the sunbeam has been rather unfortunately called photography, which means light-painting, for the process is not due to light, but is rather interfered with by it; and, contrary to all preconceived ideas, the pictures taken in our comparatively sombre country, are[Pg 125] more easily and brilliantly produced than in brighter and more sunny lands—so much so, that a gentleman, who took the requisite materials to Mexico, in order to take views of its principal buildings, met with failure after failure, and it was not until the darker days of the rainy season that he met with any measure of success.

The technique of painting with sunlight has unfortunately been termed photography, which means light-painting. However, this process isn't a result of light; instead, it's actually hindered by it. Contrary to common beliefs, the pictures captured in our relatively dull country are[Pg 125] produced more easily and vibrantly than in brighter, sunnier places. In fact, a man who brought the necessary materials to Mexico to take pictures of its main buildings faced failure after failure. It wasn't until the darker days of the rainy season that he finally found some success.


THE RECORD OF A MADNESS WHICH WAS NOT INSANITY.

A fresh, bright dawn, the loveliest hour of an English summer, was rousing the slumbering life in woods and fields, and painting the heavens and the earth in the gorgeous hues of the sunrise.

A fresh, bright dawn, the most beautiful hour of an English summer, was waking up the slumbering life in the woods and fields, and painting the sky and the ground in the stunning colors of the sunrise.

Beautiful it was to see the first blush of day mantling over the distant hills, tinging them with a faint crimson, and the first smile shooting, in one bright beam through the sky, while it lit up the fair face of nature with a sparkling light. Lilias Randolph stood on the flight of steps which led from the Abbey to the park, and looked down on the joyous scene. She seemed herself a very type of the morning, with her sunny eyes, and her golden hair; and her gaze wandered glad and free over the spreading landscape, while her thoughts roamed far away in regions yet more bright—even the sunlit fields of fancy.

It was beautiful to see the first light of day spreading over the distant hills, coloring them with a gentle crimson, and the first smile breaking through the sky in a bright beam, lighting up the lovely face of nature with a sparkling glow. Lilias Randolph stood on the steps leading from the Abbey to the park and looked down at the joyful scene. She seemed like a perfect representation of morning, with her sunny eyes and golden hair; her gaze happily roamed over the expansive landscape, while her thoughts wandered far away to places even brighter—even the sunlit fields of imagination.

It was the day and the hour when she was to go and meet Richard Sydney, in order to have, at length, a full revelation of his mysterious connection with her cousin. She knew that it was an interview of solemn import to both of those, in whom she felt so deep an interest; yet, so entirely were one thought and one feeling alone gaining empire over her spirit that, even then, in that momentous hour, they had no share in the visions with which her heart was busy.

It was the day and hour when she was supposed to meet Richard Sydney to finally uncover the mystery of his connection with her cousin. She realized that this meeting was extremely important for both of them, people she cared about deeply; however, one thought and one feeling completely took over her mind, so that even in this significant moment, they didn’t occupy her heart’s attention at all.

So soon, therefore, as Lilias came within sight of Richard Sydney, who had arrived first at the place of rendezvous, she resolutely banished the thoughts that were so absorbing to her own glad heart, and set herself seriously to give her entire attention to the work now before her, if, haply, it might be given her, in some degree, to minister unto their grievous misery. And truly her first glance upon the face of the man who stood there, with his eyes fixed on the path which was to bring her and her hoped-for succor near to him, would have sufficed to have driven all ideas from her mind, save the one conviction, that in that look alone she had acquired a deeper knowledge of suffering than her own past life, in all its details, had ever afforded her. Sydney heard her step, long before she believed it possible, and, bounding toward her, he seized her hand with a grasp which was almost convulsive. He drew her aside to some little distance from her nurse, who sat down on a bank to wait for them.

As soon as Lilias saw Richard Sydney, who had arrived first at the meeting spot, she pushed away the thoughts that were filling her happy heart and focused fully on the task ahead of her, hoping she could help ease their deep sorrow. Honestly, her first look at the man standing there, his eyes fixed on the path that would bring her and her hoped-for help to him, was enough to clear her mind of everything except for the strong realization that in that one glance, she understood suffering more deeply than anything her past life had taught her. Sydney heard her approach long before she thought it was possible, and rushing towards her, he took her hand with a grip that was almost frantic. He pulled her aside, a bit away from her nurse, who had sat on a nearby bank to wait for them.

Lilias bent down her head that she might not seem to note the workings of his countenance, as he laid bare before her the most hidden springs of his soul, and he began:

Lilias lowered her head so it wouldn't look like she was paying attention to the expressions on his face while he revealed the deepest parts of his soul to her, and he began:

"I was born heir to a curse. Centuries ago an ancestor of mine murdered a woman he once[Pg 126] had loved, because his neglect had driven her mad, and that in her ravings she revealed his many crimes. With her dying breath she invoked the curse of insanity on him and his house forever, and the cry of her departing soul was heard. There has not been a generation in our family since that hour which has not had its shrieking maniac to echo in our ears the murdered woman's scream. Some there have been among the Sydneys of peculiar constitution, as it would seem, who have not actually been visited with the malady; but they have never failed to transmit it to their children. Of such am I; while my father died a suicide by his own senseless act, and his only other child besides myself, my sister, wears her coronet of straw in the Dublin Asylum, and calls herself a queen.

I was born into a curse. Centuries ago, an ancestor of mine killed a woman he once loved because his neglect drove her insane, and in her madness, she exposed his many crimes. With her last breath, she cursed him and his family with insanity forever, and her anguished cry was heard. Since that moment, there hasn’t been a generation in our family without a screaming maniac to remind us of the murdered woman's scream. Some in the Sydney family seem to be spared from the madness, but they always pass it down to their children. I’m one of those; while my father died by suicide through his own reckless choice, my only sibling, my sister, wears her straw crown in the Dublin Asylum and calls herself a queen.

"It would appall you to hear the fearful calamities which each succeeding family has undergone through this awful curse. At last, as the catalogue of tragic events grew darker and darker, it became a solemn matter of discussion to our unhappy race, whether it were not an absolute duty that the members of a house so doomed, should cease at last to propagate the curse, and by a resolute abandonment of all earthly ties, cause our name and misery to perish from the earth. The necessity for this righteous sacrifice was admitted; but the resolution in each separate individual to become the destined holocaust, has hitherto forever failed before the power of the mighty human love that lured them ever to its pure resistless joys. It was so with my father—like myself he was an only son; and, in the ardor of a generous youth, he vowed to be the offering needful to still the cry of that innocent blood for vengeance; but the sweet face of my mother came between him and his holy vow. He married her, and the punishment came down with fearful weight on both, when her fond heart broke at sight of his ghastly corpse. Then it was she knew the retribution in their case had been just; and on her dying bed, with the yet unclosed coffin of her husband by her side, she made me vow upon the holy cross that I, myself, would be the sacrifice—that never would I take a wife unto my heart or home; and that never, from my life, should any helpless being inherit existence with a curse. That vow I took, that vow I kept, and that vow I will keep, though Aletheia, beloved of my heart and soul, dearer than all beneath the skies, were to lay herself down beneath my very feet to die. Oh! shall we not rest in heaven."

"It would shock you to hear the terrible disasters that each family has faced because of this awful curse. As the list of tragic events became darker and darker, it became a serious topic of discussion for our unfortunate community whether it was our absolute duty to stop the continuation of this curse. By resolutely cutting all earthly ties, we could make our name and misery disappear from the earth. The need for this righteous sacrifice was accepted; however, the decision for each individual to become the intended sacrifice has always crumbled in the face of powerful human love that constantly draws them toward its pure, irresistible joys. My father experienced this—like me, he was an only son; and, in the enthusiasm of youth, he promised to be the offering needed to quiet the call for vengeance from that innocent blood. But my mother's sweet face stood between him and his sacred vow. He married her, and the punishment fell heavily on both when her loving heart broke at the sight of his lifeless body. Then she realized that the retribution in their case had been just; and on her deathbed, with his coffin still unopened beside her, she made me promise on the holy cross that I would be the sacrifice—that I would never take a wife into my heart or home; and that no helpless being would inherit life with a curse from me. I made that vow, I kept that vow, and I will keep that vow, even if Aletheia, beloved of my heart and soul, dearer than anything beneath the skies, were to lay down before me to die. Oh! Shall we not find peace in heaven?"

He bowed his head for a moment, and his frame shook with emotion, but driving back the tide of anguish, he went on: "After my mother's death and my sister's removal, who had been insane almost from childhood, I shut myself up entirely at Sydney Court, and gave way to a species of morbid melancholy which was thought to be fearfully dangerous for one in my position. I had friends, however; and the best and truest was Colonel Randolph, my Aletheia's father, the early companion of my own poor, hapless parent. He was resolved to save me from the miserable[Pg 127] condition in which I then was. He came to me and told me, with all the authority of his long friendship, that I must go with him to the M——, where he had been appointed governor. He said it was a crime to waste a life, which, though unblest by human ties, might be made most useful to my fellow-creatures. I had studied much in brighter days, and given to the world the fruits of my labors. These had not passed unheeded; he told me they had proved that talents had been committed to me whereby I might be a benefactor to my race, all the more that no soft endearments of domestic joys would wean my thoughts from sterner duties. I was to go with him; he insisted it would benefit myself, and would injure none. His family consisted of his one daughter, his precious, beloved Aletheia, for he doated on her with more than the ordinary love of a father. She knew my history, and would be to me a sister. Alas! alas! for her destruction, I consented."

He lowered his head for a moment, shaking with emotion, but pushing back the wave of sadness, he said: "After my mother's death and my sister being taken away, who had been insane almost since childhood, I completely isolated myself at Sydney Court and fell into a kind of deep sadness that was considered extremely dangerous for someone in my position. I did have friends, though; and the best and truest was Colonel Randolph, my Aletheia's father, who had been my own poor, unfortunate parent’s early companion. He was determined to pull me out of the miserable[Pg 127] state I was in. He came to me and told me, with all the authority of our long friendship, that I needed to go with him to the M——, where he had been appointed governor. He said it was a crime to waste a life that, despite being devoid of human connections, could still be incredibly useful to my fellow beings. I had studied a lot in happier times and shared the results of my efforts with the world. These contributions hadn’t gone unnoticed; he told me they showed that I had been given talents that could allow me to be a benefit to my race, especially since no comforting family ties would distract me from more serious responsibilities. I was supposed to go with him; he insisted it would be good for me and wouldn’t harm anyone. His family was made up of his one daughter, his precious, beloved Aletheia, as he adored her with more than the usual love of a father. She knew my story and would be like a sister to me. Alas! alas! for her downfall, I agreed."

Again, a momentary pause. Lilias gently raised her compassionate eyes, but he saw her not; he seemed lost in a vision of the past, and soon went on:

Again, a brief pause. Lilias softly lifted her caring eyes, but he didn’t notice; he appeared to be caught up in a memory of the past, and soon continued:

"That lovely land where I dwelt with her, it seems a type of the beauty and happiness which was around me then! And, oh! what a dream it is to think of now—the cloudless sky—the glorious sun—and her eyes undimmed, her smile unfaded! Oh! Aletheia—my Aletheia—treasure of many lives! bright and joyous—light to the eyes that looked on her, blessing to the hearts that loved her—would that I had died or ever I drew her very soul into mine, and left her the poor, crushed, helpless being that she is! You can not picture to yourself the fascination that was around her then—high-minded, noble in heart, lofty in soul; her bright spirit stamped its glory on her face, and she was beautiful, with all spiritual loveliness. None ever saw her who loved her not—her rare talents—her enchanting voice; that voice of her very soul, which spoke in such wonderful music, drew to her feet every creature who knew her; for with all these gifts, this wonderful intellect, and rarest powers of mind, she was playful, winning, simple as an innocent child. I say none saw her, and loved her not; how, think you, I loved her?—the doomed man, the desolate being, whose barren, joyless life walked hand in hand with a curse. Let this anguish tell you how I loved her;" and he turned on Lilias a face of ghastly paleness, convulsed with agony, and wet with the dews of suffering; but he did not pause, he went on rapidly: "I was mad, then, in one sense, though it was the madness of the heart, and not the brain. Poor wretch, I thought I would wring a joy out of my blasted life in spite of fate, and, while none other claimed her as their own, I would revel in her presence, and in the rapture of her tenderness. I knew it was mockery when I bid her call me brother—a sister truly is loved with other love than that I gave her. I would have seen every relation I had ever known laid dead at my feet, could I[Pg 128] have thereby purchased for her, my thrice-beloved one, one moment's pleasure.

"That beautiful land where I lived with her feels like a reflection of the beauty and happiness that surrounded me back then! And, oh! what a dream it is to think about now—the clear sky—the glorious sun—and her eyes bright, her smile unchanged! Oh! Aletheia—my Aletheia—treasure of many lives! bright and joyful—light to the eyes that gazed upon her, a blessing to the hearts that loved her—if only I had died before I drew her very soul into mine, leaving her as the poor, crushed, helpless being that she is! You cannot imagine the enchantment that surrounded her then—high-minded, noble in heart, lofty in soul; her vibrant spirit graced her face with glory, and she was beautiful, with all spiritual loveliness. No one ever saw her without loving her—her rare talents—her enchanting voice; that voice of her very soul, which spoke in such wonderful music, drew every creature who knew her to her feet; for with all these gifts, this incredible intellect, and the rarest powers of mind, she was playful, charming, as simple as an innocent child. I say no one saw her and didn't love her; how do you think I loved her?—the doomed man, the desolate being, whose barren, joyless life walked hand in hand with a curse. Let this anguish show you how I loved her;" and he looked at Lilias with a face of ghastly paleness, twisted with agony, and wet with the tears of suffering; but he didn’t stop; he continued quickly: "I was mad, in a way, though it was the madness of the heart, not the mind. Poor wretch, I thought I could squeeze joy out of my shattered life despite fate, and while no one else claimed her as their own, I would indulge in her presence and in the joy of her tenderness. I knew it was a joke when I asked her to call me brother—a sister is truly loved in a different way than what I gave her. I would have gladly seen every relationship I ever knew laid dead at my feet if it meant I could have bought for her, my dearly beloved, just one moment of happiness."

"Lilias, does a passion of such fearful power shock and terrify you, who have only known the placid beating of a gentle, childlike heart? Take a yet deeper lesson, then, in the dark elements of which this life may be composed, and learn that deep, and true, and mighty as was my love for her, it is as a mere name, a breath, a vapor, compared with that most awful affection which Aletheia had already, even then, vowed unto me, in the depth of her secret heart. Ah! it needed, in truth, such an agony as that which is now incorporate with it in her heart, to cope with its immensity; for, truly, no weak happiness of earth could have had affinity with it—a love so saint-like must needs have been a martyr. I will not attempt to tell you what her devotion to me was, and is, and shall be, while one faintest throb of life is stirring in her noble heart. You have seen it—you have seen that love looking through those eyes of hers, like a mighty spirit endowed with an existence separate from her own, which holds her soul in its fierce, powerful grasp.

"Lilias, do you feel shocked and terrified by a passion so intense, when you’ve only experienced the calm rhythm of a gentle, childlike heart? So take a deeper lesson about the darker aspects of this life, and understand that as deep, true, and strong as my love for her was, it’s just a name, a breath, a vapor compared to the most overwhelming affection that Aletheia had already vowed to me in the depths of her secret heart. Ah! It truly required such agony, now intertwined with her heart, to match its enormity; for no fragile happiness on earth could resonate with it—a love so saint-like had to be a martyr. I won't try to explain what her devotion to me was, is, and will be, while even the faintest beat of life stirs in her noble heart. You've seen it—you’ve seen that love shining through her eyes, like a mighty spirit with its own existence, holding her soul in a fierce, powerful grip."

"I must hurry on now, and my words must be rapid as the events that drove us from the serene elysian fields of that first dear companionship, through storm and whirlwind, to this wilderness of misery where I am sent to wander to and fro, like a murderer, as I am; condemned to watch the daily dying of the sweet life I have destroyed. You may think me blind and senseless, for so I surely was, but it is certain that I never suspected the love she bore me. I saw that she turned away from the crowds that flocked around, and was deaf to all the offers that were made to her, of rank, and wealth, and station, and many a true heart's love; but I thought this was because her own was yet untouched, and when I saw that I alone was singled out to be the object of her attention and solicitude, I fancied it was but the effect of her deep, generous pity for my desolate condition—and pity it was, but such as the mother feels for the suffering of the first-born, whom she adores. And the day of revelation came!

"I need to hurry now, and my words must be as quick as the events that drove us from the peaceful paradise of our first deep connection, through chaos and turmoil, to this place of despair where I’m forced to wander aimlessly, like a criminal, as I am; condemned to witness the daily demise of the beautiful life I have ruined. You might see me as blind and senseless, because I definitely was, but it’s clear that I never realized the love she had for me. I noticed that she turned away from the crowds that gathered around her and ignored all the offers made to her of status, wealth, and many genuine hearts’ love; but I thought this was because her own heart was still untouched. And when I saw that I was the only one she seemed to care for, I assumed it was just her deep, generous pity for my lonely situation—and it was pity, but like the kind a mother feels for her firstborn who she adores in their pain. And then came the day of revelation!"

"I told you how Colonel Randolph doated on his daughter; truly, none ever loved Aletheia with a common love. When he was released from the duties of his high office, it was one of his greatest pleasures to walk, or ride with me, that he might talk to me of her. One morning he came in with a packet of letters from England, and, taking me by the arm, drew me out into the garden, that he might tell me some news, which, he said, gave him exceeding joy. The letters announced the arrival of the son of an old friend of his, who had just succeeded to his title and estates, the young Marquis of L——, and further communicated, in the most unreserved manner, that his object in coming to the M—— was to make Aletheia his wife, if he could win her to himself; he had long loved her, and had only delayed his offer till he could install her in his lordly castle with all the honors[Pg 129] of his station. To see this union accomplished, Colonel Randolph said, had been his one wish since both had played as children at his feet, and he now believed the desired consummation was at hand. Aletheia's consent was alone required, and there seemed no reason to doubt it would be given, for there was not, he asserted, in all England, one more worthy of her, by every noble gift of mind, than the high-born, generous-hearted L——.

"I told you how Colonel Randolph was devoted to his daughter; truly, no one ever loved Aletheia in a typical way. When he finished his high office duties, one of his greatest joys was to walk or ride with me so he could talk about her. One morning, he came in with a packet of letters from England and, taking me by the arm, led me out into the garden to share some news that, he said, brought him immense joy. The letters announced the arrival of the son of an old friend of his, who had just inherited his title and estates, the young Marquis of L——. They also revealed, quite openly, that his intention in coming to the M—— was to propose to Aletheia, if he could win her over; he had long loved her and had only postponed his offer until he could welcome her into his grand castle with all the honors of his position. To see this union happen, Colonel Randolph said, had been his one wish since they both played as children at his feet, and he now believed that the desired outcome was close at hand. Aletheia's consent was the only thing needed, and there seemed to be no reason to think it wouldn’t be given, as, he asserted, there was no one in all of England more worthy of her, with every noble quality of mind, than the high-born, generous-hearted L——."

"Why, indeed, should she not, at once, accept the brilliant destiny carved out for her!—I did not doubt it more than the exulting father, and I heard my doom fixed in the same senseless state of calm with which the criminal who knows his guilt and its penalty, hears the sentence of his execution. I had long known this hour must come; and what had I now to do but gather, as it were, a shroud round my tortured soul, and, like the Cæsars, die decently to all earthly happiness! Even in that tremendous hour, I had a consciousness of the dignity of suffering—suffering, that is, which comes from the height of heaven above, and not from the depths of crime below! I resolved that the lamp of my life's joy should go out without a sigh audible to human ears, save hers alone, who had lit that pure flame in the black night of my existence.

"Why shouldn’t she just accept the amazing future laid out for her? I didn’t doubt it any more than the proud father did, and I felt my fate locked in the same numb calmness as a criminal who knows his guilt and its punishment hears the verdict of his execution. I had known for a long time that this moment would come; now all I could do was wrap my tortured soul in a shroud and, like the Caesars, die gracefully to all worldly happiness! Even in that terrifying moment, I felt a sense of dignity in suffering—suffering that comes from the heights of heaven above, not from the depths of crime below! I decided that the light of my life's joy should extinguish without a sigh that anyone else could hear, except for her, who had ignited that pure flame in the dark night of my existence."

"Lilias, I enter into no detail of what I felt in that momentous crisis, for you have no woman's heart if you have not understood it, in its uttermost extent of misery. One thought, however, stood up pre-eminent in that chaos of suffering—the conviction that I must not see Aletheia Randolph again, or the very powers of my mind would give way in the struggle that must ensue. This thought, and one other—one solitary gleam of dreary comfort, that alone relieved the great darkness which had fallen upon me, were all that seemed distinct in my mind: that last mournful consolation was the resolution taken along with the vow to see her no more, that ere I passed forever from her memory, she should know what was the love with which I loved her.

"Lilias, I won't go into detail about what I felt during that crucial moment, because if you haven’t experienced it, you don’t understand the depths of misery involved. One thought, however, stood out amidst the chaos of suffering—the realization that I could not see Aletheia Randolph again, or my mind would break under the strain that would follow. This thought, along with another—a single flicker of bleak comfort that alone lightened the heavy darkness surrounding me—was all that seemed clear in my mind: that last sorrowful comfort was my decision, along with the vow to never see her again, that before I faded from her memory, she should know the depth of my love for her."

"Quietly I gave her father my hand when I quitted him, and he said, 'We shall meet in the evening;' my own determination was never to look upon his face again. I went home, and sitting down, I wrote to Aletheia a letter, in which all the pent-up feelings of the deep, silent devotion I cherished for her, were poured out in words to which the wretchedness of my position gave a fearful intensity—burning words, indeed! She has told me since, that they seemed to eat into her heart like fire. I left the letter for her and quitted the house; and I believed my feet should never pass that beloved threshold again. There was a spot where Aletheia and I had gone almost day by day to wander, since we had dwelt in that land. She loved it, because she could look out over the ocean in its boundlessness, whose aspect soothed her, she said, as with a promise of eternity. It was a huge rock that rose perpendicularly from the sea, and sloped[Pg 130] down on the other side, by a gentle declivity, to the plain. I have often thought what a type of our life it was; we saw nothing of the precipice as we ascended the soft and verdant mount, and suddenly it was at our feet, and if the blast of heaven had driven us another step, it had been into destruction.

"Quietly, I gave her father my hand when I left him, and he said, 'We shall meet in the evening;' but I was determined never to see his face again. I went home, sat down, and wrote Aletheia a letter that expressed all the intense feelings of deep, silent devotion I had for her. The despair of my situation made my words burn with intensity—truly powerful words! She told me later that they felt like they were burning into her heart. I left the letter for her and left the house; I believed my feet would never cross that beloved threshold again. There was a place where Aletheia and I had almost daily wandered since we arrived in that land. She loved it because she could look out over the endless ocean, which she said soothed her like a promise of eternity. It was a massive rock that rose straight up from the sea and sloped down gently on the other side to the plain. I have often thought about how much it represented our life; we didn’t see the cliff as we climbed the soft, green hill, and suddenly it was right at our feet. If a strong gust had pushed us just one more step, we would have been headed for disaster."

"Thither, when I had parted, as I believed, forever, with that darling of my heart, I went with what intent I know not: it was not to commit suicide; although in that form, in the mad longing for it, the curse of my family has ever declared itself. I was yet sane, and my soul acknowledged and abhorred the tremendous guilt of that mysterious crime, wherein the created dashes back the life once given, in the very face of the Creator; not for suicide I went, yet, Lilias, as I stood within an inch of death, and looked down on the placid waters that had so swiftly cooled the burning anguish of my heart and brain, I felt, in the intense desire to terminate my life, and in that desire resisted, a more stinging pain than any which my bitter term of years has ever offered me. Oh, how shall I tell you what followed? I feel as though I could not: and briefly, and, indeed, incoherently, must I speak; for on the next hour—the supreme, the crowning hour of all my life—my spirit enters not, without an intensity of feeling which well-nigh paralyzes every faculty.

"After I had said goodbye, believing I would never see my beloved again, I went away, not really knowing why. It wasn't to end my life; although in that insane longing for it, my family's curse has always shown itself. I was still sane, and I recognized and detested the enormous guilt of that mysterious act, where the created being snatches away the life once given, right in front of the Creator. I didn’t go to end my life, yet, Lilias, as I stood just inches from death, gazing down at the calm waters that had quickly soothed the burning pain in my heart and mind, I felt, in my deep desire to end my life—and in resisting that desire—more agony than anything my bitter years have ever given me. Oh, how can I explain what happened next? I feel as if I can't: I must speak briefly and, frankly, incoherently; for in the next hour—the highest, most significant hour of my life—my spirit doesn’t enter without an intensity of feeling that nearly paralyzes me."

"I stood there, and suddenly I heard a sound—a soft, breathing sound, as of a gentle fawn wearied in some steep ascent—a sound coming nearer and nearer, bringing with it ten thousand memories of hours and days that were to come no more: a step, light and tremulous, falling on the soft grass softly, and then a voice.—Oh, when mine ears are locked in death, shall I not hear it?—a voice uttering low and sweet, my well-known name. I turned, and when I saw that face, on whose sweet beauty other eyes should feed, yea, other lips caress, for one instant the curse of my forefather seemed upon me; my brain reeled, and I would have sprung from the precipice to die. But ere I could accomplish the sudden craving of this momentary frenzy, Aletheia, my own Aletheia, was at my feet, her clinging arms were round me, her lips were pressed upon my hands, and her voice—her sweet, dear voice—went sounding through my soul like a sudden prophecy of most unearthly joy, murmuring, 'Live, live for me, mine own forever!'

"I stood there, and suddenly, I heard a sound—a soft, breathing sound, like a gentle fawn tired from climbing a steep hill—a sound coming closer and closer, bringing with it countless memories of hours and days that would never come again: a light, trembling step on the soft grass, and then a voice.—Oh, when my ears are sealed in death, will I not hear it?—a voice softly uttering my familiar name. I turned, and when I saw that face, whose sweet beauty others should admire, yes, others should kiss, for a moment the curse of my ancestor seemed to weigh on me; my mind spun, and I felt like leaping from the cliff to die. But before I could give in to the sudden urge of this fleeting frenzy, Aletheia, my own Aletheia, was at my feet, her arms wrapped around me, her lips pressed to my hands, and her voice—her sweet, dear voice—rang through my soul like a sudden omen of the most otherworldly joy, whispering, 'Live, live for me, my own forever!'"

"Oh, Lilias, how can I attempt with human words to tell you of these things, so far beyond the power of language to express! I felt that what she said was true—that in some way, by some wonderful means, she was in very deed and truth, 'mine own, forever,' though, in that moment of supremest joy, no less firmly than in the hour of supremest sorrow by my mother's dying bed, my heart and soul were faithful to the vow then taken, that never on my desolate breast a wife should lay her head to rest. 'Mine own forever!'—as I looked down, and met the gaze of fathomless, unutterable love with which[Pg 131] her tearful eyes were fastened full upon my own, I was as one who having long dwelt in darkest night, was blinded with the sudden glare of new returning day. I staggered back, and leant against the rock; faint and shivering I stretched out my hands on that beloved head, longing for the power to bless her, and said, 'Oh, Aletheia, what is it you have said: have you forgotten who and what I am!'

"Oh, Lilias, how can I use mere words to explain these things that are so far beyond what language can convey! I felt that what she said was true—that in some amazing way, she was indeed 'mine, forever.’ Yet, in that moment of ultimate joy, just like at the hour of deepest sorrow by my mother’s dying bedside, my heart and soul remained loyal to the promise I made then: that no wife would ever lay her head to rest on my lonely chest. 'Mine forever!'—as I looked down and met the gaze of boundless, indescribable love in her tearful eyes locked onto mine, I felt like someone who had been trapped in the darkest night, suddenly blinded by the bright return of day. I staggered back and leaned against the rock; feeling faint and trembling, I reached out my hands to that cherished head, wishing I had the power to bless her, and said, 'Oh, Aletheia, what have you just said: do you not remember who I am!'"

"'No!' was her answer, steady and distinct; 'and for that very reason, because you are a stricken man, forever cut off from all the common ties of earth, have I been given to you, to be in heart and soul peculiarly your own, with such a measure of entire devotion as never was offered to man on earth before.'

"'No!' was her answer, firm and clear; 'and for that very reason, because you are a broken man, forever separated from all the normal connections of life, I have been given to you, to be in heart and soul uniquely yours, with such a level of complete devotion as has never been offered to anyone on earth before.'"

"I looked at her almost in bewilderment. She rose up to her full height, perfectly calm, and with a deep solemnity in her words and aspect.

"I stared at her in complete confusion. She stood tall, completely calm, her words and demeanor filled with a profound seriousness."

"'Richard,' she said, 'the lives of both of us are hanging on this hour; by it shall all future existence on this earth be shaped for us, and its memory shall come with death itself to look us in the face, and stamp our whole probation with its seal; it becomes us, therefore, to cast aside all frivolous rules of man's convention, and speak the truth as deathless soul with deathless soul. Hear me, then, while I open up my inmost spirit to your gaze, and then decide whether you will lay your hand upon my life, and say—'Thou art my own;' or whether you will fling it from you to perish as some worthless thing?'

"'Richard,' she said, 'our lives are hanging in the balance right now; this moment will shape all our future on this earth, and its memory will confront us at the end of our lives, marking our entire time here with its imprint. So, we should set aside all the trivial rules of society and speak the truth from one soul to another. Listen to me as I reveal my deepest self to you, and then decide if you will claim my life and say—'You are mine;’ or if you will cast it away as if it were worthless?'

"I bowed my head in token that she should continue, for I could not speak. I, Lilias, who had looked death and insanity in the face, under their most frightful shapes, trembled, like a reed in the blast, before the presence of a love that was mightier than either! Aletheia stretched out her hand over the precipice, and spoke—

"I lowered my head as a sign for her to keep going, because I couldn't find the words. I, Lilias, who had faced death and madness in their darkest forms, shook like a reed in the wind before the overwhelming force of a love that was stronger than either! Aletheia reached her hand out over the edge and spoke—

"'Hear me, then, declare first of all, solemnly as though this hour were my last, that, not even to save you from that death which, but now, you dared to meditate, would I ever consent to be your wife, even if you wished it, as utterly as I doubt not you abhor the idea of such perjury—not to save you from death—I say—the death of the mortal body, for by conniving at your failure in that most righteous vow, once taken on the holy cross itself, I should peril—yea, destroy, it may be, the immortal soul, which is the true object of my love. Hear me, in the face of that pure sky announce this truth, and then may I freely declare to you all that is in my heart—all the sacred purpose of my life for you, without a fear that my worst enemy could pronounce me unmaidenly or overbold, though I have that to say which few women ever said unasked.'

"Hear me, then, let me solemnly declare, as if this hour were my last, that not even to save you from the death you just contemplated would I ever agree to be your wife, even if that’s what you wanted. I’m certain you despise the thought of such betrayal—not to save you from death, I say—the death of the physical body. By allowing you to break that sacred vow, made upon the holy cross itself, I would risk—indeed, quite possibly destroy—the immortal soul, which is the true object of my love. Hear me, under this pure sky, as I declare this truth, and then I may freely share with you everything in my heart—all the sacred purpose of my life for you, without fear that my worst enemy could call me unchaste or too bold, even though I have something to say that few women have ever shared without being asked."

"Unmaidenly! Oh, Lilias, could you have seen the noble dignity of her fearless innocence in that hour, you would have felt that never had the impress of a purer heart been stamped upon a virgin brow."

"Unmaidenly! Oh, Lilias, if you could have seen the noble dignity of her fearless innocence in that moment, you would have realized that no one has ever had the mark of a purer heart on a virgin brow."

"'Have you understood and well considered this my settled purpose never to be your wife?' she continued.

"'Have you understood and thought carefully about my decision to never be your wife?' she continued.

"And I said—'I have.'"

"And I said, 'I have.'"

"'Then speak out, my soul,' she exclaimed, lifting up her eyes as if inspired. 'Tell him that there is a righteous Providence over the life that immolates itself for virtue's sake! and that another existence hath been sent to meet it in the glorious sacrifice, in order that this one may yield up its treasures to the heart that would have stript itself of all! Richard, Richard Sydney, you have made a holocaust of your life, and lo! by the gift of another life, it is repaid to you.'

"'Then speak up, my soul,' she exclaimed, raising her eyes as if inspired. 'Tell him that there's a righteous Providence watching over the life that sacrifices itself for the sake of virtue! And that another existence has come to meet it in the glorious sacrifice, so that this one can give up its treasures to the heart that would have stripped itself of everything! Richard, Richard Sydney, you've made a sacrifice of your life, and look! By the gift of another life, it is returned to you.'"

"Slowly she knelt down, and took my hand in both of hers, while with an aspect calm and firm, and a voice unfaltering, she spoke this vow:

"Slowly she knelt down and took my hand in both of hers. With a calm and steady expression and a strong voice, she made this vow:

'I, Aletheia Randolph, do most solemnly vow and promise to give myself, in heart and soul, unto the last day of my life, wholly and irrevocably, to Richard Sydney. I devote to him, and him alone, my whole heart, my whole life, and my whole love. I do forever forswear, for his sake, all earthly ties, all earthly affections, and all earthly hopes. I will love him only, live for him only, and make it my one happiness to minister to him in all things as faithfully and tenderly as though I were bound to him by the closest of human bonds—in spite of all obstacles and the world's blame—in defiance of all allurements, which might induce me to abandon him. I will seek to abide ever as near to him as may be, that I may bestow on him all the care and tender watchfulness which the most faithful wife could offer; but absent or present, living or dying, no human being on this earth shall ever have known such an entire devotion as I will give to him till the last breath pass from this heart in death!'

'I, Aletheia Randolph, solemnly vow and promise to dedicate myself, heart and soul, to Richard Sydney for the rest of my life, completely and irrevocably. I give him, and him alone, my entire heart, my entire life, and my entire love. For his sake, I will forever renounce all earthly ties, affections, and hopes. I will love him only, live for him only, and find my happiness in supporting him in everything as faithfully and tenderly as if we were bound by the strongest human connection—in spite of any obstacles and the world's judgment—in defiance of any temptations that might lead me to abandon him. I will strive to be as close to him as possible, so I can provide him with all the care and attention that the most devoted wife could give; but whether I am near or far, living or dying, no one on this earth will ever experience such complete devotion as I will give to him until my last breath.'

"I was speechless, Lilias—speechless with something almost of horror at the sacrifice she was making! I strove to withdraw my hand—I could have died to save her from thus immolating herself; but she clung to me, and a deadly paleness spread itself over her countenance as she felt my movement.

"I was at a loss for words, Lilias—at a loss with a kind of horror at the sacrifice she was making! I tried to pull my hand away—I would have given anything to save her from sacrificing herself like this; but she held on to me, and a sickly pallor spread across her face as she sensed my movement."

"'Hear me! hear me yet again, Richard Sydney!' she exclaimed; 'you can not prevent me taking this vow; it was registered in the record of my fate—uttered again and again deep in my soul, long before it was spoken by these mortal lips!—it is done—I am yours forever, or forever perjured! But hear me!—hear me!—although the offering of my life is made, yea, and it shall be yours in every moment, in every thought, in every impulse of my being, yet I can not force you to accept this true oblation, made once for all, and forever! I can not constrain you to load your existence with mine. Now, now, the consummation of all is in your own hands; you may make this offering, which is never to be recalled, as you will—a blessing or a curse to yourself as unto me! I am powerless—what you decree I must submit to; but hear me, hear me!—although you now reject, and scorn, and spurn me—me, and the life which I have given you—although you drive me from you, and command me never to appear before your eyes again, yet,[Pg 133] Richard Sydney, I will keep my vow! Even in obeying you, and departing to the uttermost corner of the earth that you may never look upon my face again; yet will I keep my vow, and the life shall be yours, and the love shall be around you; and the heart, and the soul, and the thoughts, and the prayers of her, who is your own forever, shall be with you night and day, till she expires in the agony of your rejection.

"'Listen to me! Listen to me one more time, Richard Sydney!' she said. 'You can't stop me from taking this vow; it was written in the records of my destiny—echoed deep in my soul long before these lips ever spoke it!—it's done—I am yours forever, or forever false! But hear me!—hear me!—even though I offer my life, yes, it will be yours every moment, every thought, every impulse of my being, I can't force you to accept this true gift, made once and for all, and forever! I can't make you share your life with mine. Now, the ultimate decision is in your hands; you can accept this offering, which can never be taken back, as you choose—a blessing or a curse for you as well as for me! I am powerless—whatever you decide, I must accept; but hear me, hear me!—even if you now reject me, and scorn me, and push me away—me, and the life I have given you—even if you cast me out and order me never to show my face to you again, still,[Pg 133] Richard Sydney, I I'll keep my promise.! Even in obeying you, and leaving to the farthest corner of the earth so you may never see me again; still, I will keep my vow, and my life will be yours, and my love will surround you; and my heart, and soul, and thoughts, and prayers from her who is yours forever, will stay with you day and night, until I perish in the pain of your rejection."

"'This were the curse, and curse me if you will, I yet will bless you! And now hear, hear what the blessing might be if you so willed it. In spiritual union we should be forever linked, soul with soul, and heart with heart—all in all to one another in that wedding of our immortal spirits only, as truly and joyously as though we had been bound in an earthly bridal at the altar; abiding forever near each other in sweetest and most pure companionship, while my father lives under the same roof, and afterward still meeting daily; one in love, in joy, in hope, in sorrow; one in death (for if your soul were first called forth, I know that mine would take that summons for its own), and one, if it were so permitted, in eternity itself. This we may be, Richard Sydney, this we shall be, except you will, this day, trample down beneath your feet the life that gives itself to you. But wherefore, oh, wherefore would you do so? Why cast away the gift which hath been sent, in order that, by a wondrous and most just decree, the righteous man who, in his noble rectitude, abandoned every earthly tie, should be possessed, instead thereof, of such a deep, devoted love as never human heart received before? Wherefore, oh! wherefore? Yet, do as you will, now you know all; and I, who still, whatever be your decree, happen what may, am verily your own forever, must here abide the sentence of my life.'

"'This is the curse, and curse me if you want, but I will still bless you! And now listen, listen to what the blessing could be if you chose it. In a spiritual union, we'd be forever linked, soul to soul, heart to heart—all for each other in that wedding of our immortal spirits, as genuinely and joyfully as if we were bound in an earthly marriage at the altar; always close to one another in the sweetest and purest companionship while my father is still under the same roof, and afterward still seeing each other every day; united in love, in joy, in hope, in sorrow; one in death (for if your soul were the first to be called, I know mine would follow); and one, if it were allowed, in eternity itself. This we can be, Richard Sydney, this we shall be, unless you choose today to trample underfoot the life that is offering itself to you. But why, oh why would you do that? Why throw away the gift that's been given, so that, by a marvelous and just decree, the righteous man who, in his noble integrity, gave up every earthly bond, should instead have such a deep, devoted love as no human heart has ever received before? Why, oh! why? Yet, do as you wish, now that you know everything; and I, who am truly yours forever, no matter your decision, must accept the outcome of my life.'

"Slowly her dear head fell down upon her trembling hands, and, kneeling at my feet, she waited my acceptance or rejection of the noblest gift that ever one immortal spirit made unto another. Lilias, I told you when I commenced this agonizing record, that there were portions of it which I would breathe to no mortal ears, not even to yours, good and gentle as you are. And now, of such is all that followed in the solemn, blessed hours of which I speak; you know what my answer was; it can not be that you doubt it—could it have been otherwise, indeed? She had said truly, that the deed was done—the sacrifice was made—the life was given. What would it have availed if I, by my rejection, had punished her unparalleled devotion with unexampled misery? and for myself, could I—could I—should I have been human if I, who, till that hour, had believed myself of all men most accursed on earth—had suddenly refused to be above all men blest?

"Slowly, her precious head fell onto her trembling hands, and kneeling at my feet, she waited for my acceptance or rejection of the greatest gift one immortal spirit could give to another. Lilias, I told you when I started this painful record that there were parts of it I wouldn't share with any mortal ears, not even yours, kind and gentle as you are. And now, all that followed in those solemn, blessed hours is included in that. You know what my answer was; you can't doubt it—could it have been any different, really? She was right in saying that the deed was done—the sacrifice was made—the life was given. What would it have meant if I, by rejecting her, had punished her unmatched devotion with unparalleled misery? And for me, could I—could I—should I have been human if I, who until that moment had thought of myself as the most cursed man on earth—had suddenly refused to be the most blessed of all?"

"When the sun went down that night, sinking into the sea, whose boundlessness seemed narrow to my infinity of joy, Aletheia lay at my feet like a cradled child; and as I bent down over her, and scarcely dared to touch, with deep respect, the long, soft tresses of her waving hair,[Pg 134] which the light breeze lifted to my lips, I heard her ever murmuring, as though she could never weary of that sound of joy—'Mine own, mine own forever.'

"When the sun set that night, dipping into the sea, which felt endless yet seemed small next to my overwhelming joy, Aletheia lay at my feet like a sleeping child; and as I leaned down over her, barely daring to touch, out of deep respect, the long, soft strands of her flowing hair,[Pg 134] lifted gently by the light breeze to my lips, I heard her softly murmuring, as if she could never tire of that sound of happiness—'Mine own, mine own forever.'

"The period which followed that wonderful hour was one of an Eden-like happiness, such as, I believe, this fallen world never could before have witnessed—it was the embodiment, in every hour and instant, of that blessing of which my Aletheia had so fervently spoken—the spiritual union which linked us in heart and soul alone, was as perfect as it was unearthly; and the intense bliss which flowed from it, on both of us, could only have been equaled by the love, no less intense, that made us what we were.

"The time that came after that amazing hour was filled with a happiness that felt like paradise, something I believe this troubled world has never seen before. It was a constant realization of the blessing my Aletheia had passionately described—the spiritual connection that tied us together in heart and soul was as flawless as it was otherworldly; and the deep joy that flowed from it, for both of us, could only be matched by the equally strong love that defined who we were."

"But, Lilias, of this brief dream of deep delight I will not and I can not speak. This is a record of misery and not of joy," he continued, turning round upon her almost fiercely. "It becomes not me, who have been the murderer of Aletheia's joyous life, to take so much as the name of happiness between my lips. It passed—it departed—that joy, as a spirit departs out of the body; unseen, unheard; you know not it is gone, till suddenly you see that the beautiful living form has become a stark and ghastly corpse!—and so, in like manner, our life became a hideous thing....

"But, Lilias, I won’t and can’t talk about this brief dream of deep joy. This is a record of pain, not happiness," he continued, turning to her almost angrily. "It isn't right for me, who have caused Aletheia’s joyful life to end, to even mention the word happiness. It came—it left—that joy, like a spirit leaving the body; unseen, unheard; you don’t realize it’s gone until you suddenly see that the beautiful living figure has turned into a cold, lifeless corpse!—and similarly, our life became something terrible...."

"Colonel Randolph asked me to go on an embassy to a distant town; the absence was to be but for a fortnight. We were to write daily to one another, and we thought nothing of it. Nevertheless, in one sense, we felt it to be momentous. Aletheia designed, if an opportunity occurred, to inform her father of the change in her existence, and the irrevocable fate to which she had consigned herself. She had delayed doing so hitherto, because his mind had been fearfully disturbed by grievous disappointments in public affairs; and as he was a man of peculiarly sensitive temperament, she would not add to his distresses by the announcement of the fact, which she knew he would consider the great misfortune of his life. It was impossible, indeed, that the doating father could fail to mourn bitterly over the sacrifice of his one beloved daughter, to the man who dared not so much as give her barren life the protection of his name lest haply, he wed her to a maniac.

"Colonel Randolph asked me to go on a trip to a distant town; I would be away for just two weeks. We planned to write to each other every day, and we thought nothing of it. Still, in some ways, it felt significant. Aletheia intended, if the chance arose, to tell her father about the change in her life and the irreversible fate she had chosen. She had held off until now because his mind had been severely troubled by painful disappointments in politics; and since he was a man with a particularly sensitive nature, she didn’t want to add to his worries by revealing something she knew he would see as the greatest misfortune of his life. It was impossible, in fact, for the devoted father not to mourn deeply over the loss of his one beloved daughter to a man who wouldn’t even give her the security of his name for fear of marrying her to a lunatic."

"It was within two days of my proposed return to their home, that an express arrived in fiery haste to tell me Colonel Randolph had fallen from his horse, had received a mortal injury, and was dying. I was summoned instantly. He had said he would not die in peace till he saw me. One hurried line from Aletheia, in addition to the aid-de-camp's letter, told how even, in that awful hour, I was first and last in his thoughts. It ran thus: 'He is on his death-bed, and I have told him all. I could not let him die unknowing the consecration of his child to one so worthy of her. But, alas! I know not why, it seems almost to have maddened him. He says he will tell you all; come, then, with all speed.'

"It was just two days before I was supposed to return to their home when an express rider rushed in to inform me that Colonel Randolph had fallen from his horse, sustained a fatal injury, and was dying. I was called immediately. He’d said he wouldn’t be at peace until he saw me. A quick note from Aletheia, alongside the aide-de-camp's letter, mentioned that even in that terrible moment, I was the first and last thing on his mind. It read: 'He is on his deathbed, and I have told him everything. I couldn’t let him die without knowing about his child's dedication to someone so deserving of her. But, sadly, I don’t know why, it seems to have driven him almost mad. He says he will explain everything; come as fast as you can.'"

"In two hours I was by the side of the dying man. Aletheia was kneeling with her arms[Pg 135] round him, and he was gazing at her with sombre, mournful fondness. The instant he saw me he pushed her from him. 'Go,' he said, 'I must see this man alone.' The epithet startled me. I saw he was filled with a bitter wrath. His daughter obeyed; she rose and left the room; but as she passed me she took my hand, and bowing herself as to her master, pressed it to her lips, then turning round she said. 'Father, remember what I have told you: he is mine own forever; not even your death-bed curse could make me falter in my vow.' He groaned aloud: 'No curse, no curse, my child,' he cried; 'fear not; it is not you whom I would curse. Come—kiss me; we may perhaps not meet again; and if you find me dead at your return—' He waited till she closed the door, and then added, 'Say that Richard Sydney killed me, and you will speak the truth! Madman, madman, indeed! What is it you have done? Was it for this I took you into my home, and was to you a father? That you might slay my only daughter—that you might make such havoc of her life as is worse than a thousand deaths.'

"In two hours, I was next to the dying man. Aletheia was kneeling with her arms[Pg 135] around him, and he gazed at her with a gloomy, sorrowful affection. The moment he saw me, he pushed her away. 'Go,' he said, 'I need to see this man alone.' The term caught me off guard. I could see he was filled with bitter anger. His daughter obeyed; she stood up and left the room, but as she walked past me, she took my hand and, bowing to her father, pressed it to her lips. Then she turned and said, 'Father, remember what I've told you: he is mine forever; not even your dying curse could make me waver in my vow.' He groaned loudly, 'No curse, no curse, my child,' he cried; 'don't be afraid; it's not you I'm cursing. Come—kiss me; we may not see each other again, and if you find me dead when you return—' He waited until she closed the door, then added, 'Say that Richard Sydney killed me, and you will be telling the truth! Madman, truly mad! What have you done? Was it for this that I took you into my home and was like a father to you? That you would kill my only daughter—that you would ruin her life in a way that's worse than a thousand deaths?'”

"I would have spoken; he fiercely interrupted me: 'I know what you would say—that she gave herself to you—that she offered this oblation of a whole existence—but I tell you, if one grain of justice or of generosity had been within your coward heart, you would have flung yourself over that precipice, and so absolved her from her vow, rather than let her immolate herself to a doom so horrible; for you know not, yourself, what is that doom! Yes, poor wretch,' he added, more gently, 'you knew not what you did; but I know, and now will I tell. I, who have watched over the soul of Aletheia Randolph for well-nigh twenty years, know well of what fire it is made; I tell you I have long foreknown that there was a capacity of love in her which is most awful, and which would most infallibly work her utter woe, except its ardent immensity found a perpetual outlet in the many ties which weave themselves around a happy wife and mother. And now, oh! was there none to have mercy on her, and save her noble heart and life from such destruction; this soul of flame, fathomless as the deep, burning and pure as the spotless noonday sky, hath gone forth to fasten itself upon a desolating, barren, mournful love, where, hungering forever after happiness, and never fed, it will be driven to insanity or death! Yes, I tell you, it will be so; my departing spirit is almost on my lips, and my words must be few, but they are words of fearful truth. I know her, and I know that thus it will be; one day's separation from you, whom the world will never admit to be her own—one cloud upon your brow, which she has not the power to disperse, will work in her a torment that will sap her noble mind, and will make her, haply, the lunatic, and youyou, descendant of the maniac Sydneys, her keeper! Oh, what had she done to you that you should hate her so? Oh, wherefore have you cursed her, my innocent child, my only daughter?'

"I would have spoken; he interrupted me fiercely: 'I know what you were going to say—that she gave herself to you—that she offered her entire existence—but I tell you, if there had been even a tiny bit of justice or generosity in your cowardly heart, you would have thrown yourself over that cliff, freeing her from her vow, instead of allowing her to sacrifice herself to such a horrible fate; for you don't even know what that fate is! Yes, poor wretch,' he added more gently, 'you didn't know what you were doing; but I know, and now I will tell. I, who have watched over the soul of Aletheia Randolph for nearly twenty years, understand what kind of fire it is; I can tell you I’ve long known there’s a capacity for love in her that is overwhelming, and that would lead to her total misery, unless that intense love finds a constant outlet in the many ties that come with being a happy wife and mother. And now, oh! was there no one to have mercy on her, to save her noble heart and life from such destruction? This soul of fire, as deep as the ocean, burning and pure like the clear noonday sky, has gone forth to attach itself to a desolate, barren, sorrowful love, where, forever yearning for happiness but never receiving it, it will be driven to madness or death! Yes, I tell you, it will be so; my spirit is almost leaving my lips, and my words must be few, but they are words of harsh truth. I know her, and I know how it will be; just one day apart from you, whom the world will never accept as hers—one cloud on your brow, which she doesn’t have the power to clear, will cause her torment that will drain her noble mind and may turn her into a lunatic, and youyou, descendant of the maniac Sydneys, will be her keeper! Oh, what has she done to deserve your hatred? Oh, why have you cursed her, my innocent child, my only daughter?'”

"I fell on my knees; I gasped for breath;[Pg 136] Lilias, I felt that every word he said was true, that all would come to pass as he foretold; for he spoke with the prophetic truth of the dying; he saw my utter agony. Suddenly he lifted himself up in the bed, and the movement broke the bandage on his head, whence the blood streamed suddenly with a destructive violence; he heeded it not, but grasped my arm with the last energy of life.

"I fell to my knees, gasping for breath;[Pg 136] Lilias, I sensed that every word he said was true, that everything would unfold as he predicted; for he spoke with the prophetic clarity of someone dying; he recognized my complete agony. Suddenly, he pushed himself up in the bed, and the movement broke the bandage on his head, causing blood to gush out with overwhelming force; he didn't pay attention to it, but grabbed my arm with the last strength he had."

"'I see you are in torments,' he said, 'and fitly so; but if you have this much of grace left, now at least to suffer, it may be that every spark of justice is not dead within you, and that you will save her yet.'

"'I see you're in pain,' he said, 'and rightly so; but if you have this much grace left, at least to endure, it might mean that every bit of justice isn't lost within you, and that you might still save her.'

"'Save her!' I almost shrieked. 'Yes, if by any means upon this earth such a blessing be possible! Shall I die? I am ready—oh, how ready.'

"'Save her!' I almost screamed. 'Yes, if there’s any way on this earth that such a blessing is possible! Am I ready to die? I’m so ready—oh, how ready.'"

"'No; to die were but to carry her into your grave,' the cruel voice replied; 'but living, I believe that you may save her. From what I know of that most noble child's pure soul, I do believe that you may save her yet. Man! who have been her curse and mine, will you swear to do so, by any means I may command?'

"'No; dying would just bring her to your grave,' the cruel voice replied; 'but if you stay alive, I truly believe you can save her. From what I know about that most noble child's pure spirit, I believe you can still save her. Man! who have been both her curse and mine, will you promise to do so, by any means I ask?'"

"'I will swear!' was my answer, and his glazing eyes were suddenly lit up with a fierce delight. 'And how?' I cried.

"'I will swear!' was my response, and his glazed eyes suddenly lit up with fierce excitement. 'And how?' I shouted.

"'Thus,' he answered, drawing me close to him, and putting his lips to my ear: 'by rendering yourself hateful to her! To quit her were to bid her lament you unto the death; but by her very side to render yourself abhorrent to her, thus shall you save her! You have sworn—remember, you have sworn! Go! When I am dead, give up that voice and look of love; put on a stern aspect; treat her as a cruel taskmaster treats a slave; be harsh; be merciless; tell her the love she bears you, by its depth of passion, hath become a crime, and you have vowed to crush it out of her; but say not I commanded it; let her believe it is your own free will; punish her for that love; let her think you hate her for it; trample her soul beneath your haughty feet; let her hear naught but bitterest words—see naught but sternest looks—feel naught but a grasp severe and torturing—to tear her clinging arms from around you!—so shall you save her; for she will suffer but a little while at first, and then will leave you to be forever blest;—so shall you crush her love, and send her out from your heart to seek a better. Sydney, you have sworn to do it—you have sworn!'

"'So,' he replied, pulling me close and whispering in my ear, 'by making yourself unbearable to her! Leaving her would only make her mourn you until the end; but by staying right by her side and making yourself despised, that's how you will save her! You swore—remember, you swore! Go! When I'm gone, abandon that loving voice and look; put on a serious face; treat her like a cruel master treats a servant; be harsh; be relentless; tell her that the love she has for you, because of its intensity, has become a sin, and you have promised to eradicate it; but don't say I ordered it; let her think it’s your own choice; punish her for that love; let her believe you hate her for it; crush her spirit beneath your proud feet; let her hear nothing but the most bitter words—see nothing but the sternest looks—feel nothing but a grip that is severe and painful—to rip her arms from around you!—that’s how you will save her; because she will only suffer for a short time at first, and then she’ll leave you to find true happiness;—that’s how you will destroy her love, and set her free from your heart to find something better. Sydney, you have sworn to do it—you have sworn!'

"He repeated the words with fearful vehemence, for life was ebbing with the blood that flowed. Gathering up his last energies, he shrieked into my ear—'Say that you have sworn!—answer, or my spirit curses you forever!' and I answered: 'I have sworn!'

"He shouted the words with intense fear, as life was fading with the blood that was spilling. Summoning his last bit of strength, he screamed into my ear—'Say that you have sworn!—answer, or my spirit will curse you forever!' and I replied: 'I have sworn!'"

"He burst into a laugh of awful triumph, sunk back, and expired....

"He broke into a laugh of terrible triumph, slumped back, and died...."

"Lilias, I have kept that vow!"

"Lilias, I kept that promise!"

At these words, uttered in a hoarse and ominous tone, which seemed to convey a volume of fearful meaning, a cold shiver crept over the frame of the young Lilias: a horror unspeakable[Pg 137] took possession of her, as the vail seemed suddenly lifted up from the mysterious agony which had made Aletheia's life, even to the outward eye, a mere embodiment of perpetual suffering; and her deep and womanly appreciation of what her unhappy cousin had endured, caused her to shrink almost in fear from the wretched man by her side, who had thus been constrained to become the cruel tyrant of her he loved so fondly. But he spoke again in such broken, faltering accents, that her heart once more swelled with pity for him.

At these words, spoken in a rough and menacing tone that seemed to carry a weight of fearful meaning, a chill ran through young Lilias. An indescribable horror took hold of her as the veil was suddenly lifted from the mysterious pain that had turned Aletheia's life, even to the casual observer, into a constant struggle. Her deep, compassionate understanding of what her unfortunate cousin had gone through made her instinctively pull away from the miserable man beside her, who had been forced to become the cruel oppressor of the one he loved so dearly. But he spoke again in such broken, hesitant tones that her heart swelled with pity for him once more.

"Yes, Lilias, I kept that fearful vow: the grasp of the dead man's hand, which, even as he stiffened into a mass of senseless clay, still locked my own as with an iron gripe, seemed to have bound it on my soul, and I, alas! believed in the efficacy of this means for her restoration from the destructive madness of her love to such an one as I. I believed I thus should save her, and turn her pure affection to a salutary hate. Yes; with energy, with fierce determination, I did keep that vow, because it was to bind myself unto such untold tortures, that it seemed a righteous expiation; and what, oh, what has been the result! Her father thought he knew her. He thought the intensity of her tenderness would brave insanity or death; but, not my hatred and contempt! and he knew her not, in her unparalleled generosity! for behold her glorious devotion hath trampled even my contumely under foot, and hath risen faithful, changeless, all perfect as before.

"Yes, Lilias, I kept that terrible vow: the grip of the dead man's hand, which, even as he turned into a lifeless mass, still held mine like a vice, seemed to have chained it to my soul, and I, sadly, believed in the power of this act to bring her back from the destructive madness of her love for someone like me. I thought I could save her and turn her pure affection into a necessary hate. Yes; with energy and fierce determination, I kept that vow, because binding myself to such unimaginable pain felt like a just atonement; and what, oh, what has been the outcome! Her father thought he understood her. He believed her deep tenderness could withstand insanity or death; but not my hatred and contempt! He did not truly know her, in her extraordinary generosity! For look, her glorious devotion has trampled even my disdain underfoot, and she has remained faithful, unchanging, and perfect as before."

"Oh, Lilias, I can not tell you the detail of the cruelties I have perpetrated on her—redoubled, day by day, as I saw them all fall powerless before her matchless love. I told her that because of its intensity, her affection had become a crime, for one whose eternal abiding place was not within this world, and that it inspired me with horror and with wrath; and since she had taken me for her master, as her master, I would drive this passion from her soul, by even the sternest means that fancy can devise; and then, I dare not tell you all that I have done; but she, with her imploring voice, her tender, mournful eyes, forever answered that if she were hateful to me I had better leave her, only with me should go her love, her life, her very soul! Alas! alas! I could not leave her till my fearful task was done. I have labored—oh, let the spirit of that dead father witness—I have labored according to his will, and what has been the up-shot of it all? Lilias," he spoke with sudden fierceness, "I have learnt to crush the life out of her, but not the love! the pure, devoted, boundless love is there, still, true and tender as before, only it abides my torture, day and night, chained to the rack by these cruel hands."

"Oh, Lilias, I can't even begin to tell you all the horrible things I've done to her—intensified every day as I watched everyone around her powerless before her incredible love. I told her that because it was so intense, her feelings had turned into a crime, especially for someone whose true home isn't in this world, and that it filled me with fear and anger; and since she had chosen me as her master, I would forcefully drive this passion from her soul, using even the harshest methods I could think of. I can’t even share everything I've done; but she, with her pleading voice and her gentle, sorrowful eyes, constantly reminded me that if I hated her, I should just leave, but that her love, her life, and her very soul would come with me! Alas! Alas! I couldn't leave her until my terrifying task was completed. I have toiled—oh, let the spirit of that dead father bear witness—I have toiled according to his wishes, and what has it all led to? Lilias," he spoke with sudden intensity, "I have learned to crush the life out of her, but not the love! The pure, devoted, limitless love is still there, true and tender as ever, only it endures my torment, day and night, shackled to the rack by these cruel hands."

He buried his face on his knees, and a strong convulsion shook his frame.

He buried his face in his knees, and a strong shudder ran through his body.


A TALE OF MID-AIR.

In a cottage in the valley of Sallanches near the foot of Mont Blanc, lived old Bernard and his three sons. One morning he lay in bed[Pg 138] sick, and, burning with fever, watched anxiously for the return of his son, Jehan, who had gone to fetch a physician. At length a horse's tread was heard, and soon afterward the Doctor entered. He examined the patient closely, felt his pulse, looked at his tongue, and then said, patting the old man's cheek, "It will be nothing, my friend—nothing!" but he made a sign to the three lads, who open-mouthed and anxious, stood grouped around the bed. All four withdrew to a distant corner, the doctor shook his head, thrust out his lower lip, and said "Tis a serious attack—very serious—of fever. He is now in the height of the fit, and as soon as it abates he must have sulphate of quinine."

In a cottage in the valley of Sallanches near the base of Mont Blanc, lived old Bernard and his three sons. One morning, he lay in bed sick, burning with fever, and anxiously waited for his son Jehan, who had gone to get a doctor. Finally, the sound of a horse's steps was heard, and soon after, the doctor came in. He examined the patient closely, felt his pulse, looked at his tongue, and then said, patting the old man’s cheek, “It’s nothing, my friend—nothing!” But he signaled to the three boys, who stood around the bed, worried and wide-eyed. The four of them moved to a distant corner, and the doctor shook his head, pouted his lips, and said, “This is a serious case—very serious—of fever. He is currently in the peak of the fit, and as soon as it lets up, he’ll need sulphate of quinine.”

"What is that, doctor?"

"What's that, doc?"

"Quinine, my friend, is a very expensive medicine, but which you may procure at Sallanches. Between the two fits your father must take at least three francs' worth. I will write the prescription. You can read, Guillaume?"

"Quinine, my friend, is a very pricey medicine, but you can get it at Sallanches. Your father needs to take at least three francs’ worth between the two fits. I'll write the prescription. You can read, Guillaume?"

"Yes, doctor."

"Sure, doctor."

"And you will see that he takes it?"

"And you will see that he takes it?"

"Certainly."

"Sure."

When the physician was gone, Guillaume, Pierre, and Jehan looked at each other in silent perplexity. Their whole stock of money consisted of a franc and a half, and yet the medicine must be procured immediately.

When the doctor left, Guillaume, Pierre, and Jehan stared at each other in confused silence. They only had a franc and a half to their name, and they needed to get the medicine right away.

"Listen," said Pierre, "I know a method of getting from the mountain before night three or four five-franc pieces."

"Listen," Pierre said, "I know a way to get off the mountain before night with three or four five-franc coins."

"From the mountain?"

"From the mountain?"

"I have discovered an eagle's nest in a cleft of a frightful precipice. There is a gentleman at Sallanches, who would gladly purchase the eagles; and nothing made me hesitate but the terrible risk of taking them; but that's nothing when our father's life is concerned. We may have them now in two hours."

"I found an eagle's nest in a crack of a steep cliff. There's a guy in Sallanches who would happily buy the eagles; the only thing that held me back was the huge risk involved in getting them, but that's nothing when it comes to our father's life. We can have them in just two hours."

"I will rob the nest," said Guillaume.

"I’m going to steal the nest," said Guillaume.

"No, no, let me," said Jehan, "I am the youngest and lightest."

"No, no, let me," said Jehan, "I'm the youngest and the lightest."

"I have the best right to venture," said Pierre, "as it was I who discovered it."

"I have every right to explore," said Pierre, "since I was the one who found it."

"Come," said Pierre, "let us decide by drawing lots. Write three numbers, Guillaume, put them into my hat, and whoever draws number one will try the venture."

"Come on," said Pierre, "let's settle this by drawing lots. Write down three numbers, Guillaume, put them in my hat, and whoever picks number one will take a shot at it."

Guillaume blackened the end of a wooden splinter in the fire; tore an old card into three pieces; wrote on them one, two, three, and threw them into the hat.

Guillaume charred the tip of a wooden splinter in the fire, ripped an old card into three pieces, wrote one, two, three on them, and tossed them into the hat.

How the three hearts beat! Old Bernard lay shivering in the cold fit, and each of his sons longed to risk his own life, to save that of his father.

How the three hearts beat! Old Bernard lay shivering in the cold, and each of his sons wanted to risk his own life to save their father.

The lot fell on Pierre, who had discovered the nest; he embraced the sick man.

The lot fell on Pierre, who had found the nest; he hugged the sick man.

"We shall not be long absent, father," he said, "and it is needful for us to go together."

"We won't be gone long, Dad," he said, "and it's important for us to go together."

"What are you going to do?"

"What are you going to do?"

"We will tell you as soon as we come back."

"We'll let you know as soon as we're back."

Guillaume took down from the wall an old sabre, which had belonged to Bernard when he served as a soldier; Jehan sought a thick cord[Pg 139] which the mountaineers use when cutting down trees; and Pierre went toward an old wooden cross, reared near the cottage, and knelt before it for some minutes in fervent prayer.

Guillaume took an old saber down from the wall, which had belonged to Bernard during his time as a soldier; Jehan looked for a thick rope that the mountaineers use when cutting down trees; and Pierre approached an old wooden cross set up near the cottage and knelt in front of it for a few minutes in heartfelt prayer.

They set out together, and soon reached the brink of the precipice. The danger consisted not only in the possibility of falling several hundred feet, but still more in the probable aggression of the birds of prey, inhabiting the wild abyss.

They set out together and soon reached the edge of the cliff. The danger wasn't just the chance of falling several hundred feet, but even more so the likely attack from the birds of prey living in the wild chasm.

Pierre, who was to brave these perils, was a fine athletic young man of twenty-two. Having measured with his eye the distance he would have to descend, his brothers fastened the cord around his waist, and began to let him down. Holding the sabre in his hand, he safely reached the nook that contained the nest. In it were four eaglets of a light yellowish-brown color, and his heart beat with joy at the sight of them. He grasped the nest firmly in his left hand, and shouted joyfully to his brothers, "I have them! Draw me up!"

Pierre, who was about to face these dangers, was a strong, athletic guy of twenty-two. After judging the distance he needed to descend, his brothers tied the rope around his waist and started lowering him down. Holding the sword in his hand, he safely reached the spot where the nest was located. Inside it were four eaglets with a light yellowish-brown color, and he felt a rush of joy at the sight of them. He firmly grabbed the nest with his left hand and shouted excitedly to his brothers, "I've got them! Pull me up!"

Already the first upward pull was given to the cord, when Pierre felt himself attacked by two enormous eagles, whose furious cries proved them to be the parents of the nestlings.

Already the first upward tug was given to the cord when Pierre felt himself attacked by two enormous eagles, whose angry cries showed they were the parents of the nestlings.

"Courage, brother! defend thyself! don't fear!"

"Courage, brother! Defend yourself! Don't be afraid!"

Pierre pressed the nest to his bosom, and with his right hand made the sabre play around his head.

Pierre held the nest close to his chest and, with his right hand, waved the saber around his head.

Then began a terrible combat. The eagles shrieked, the little ones cried shrilly, the mountaineer shouted and brandished his sword. He slashed the birds with its blade, which flashed like lightning, and only rendered them still more enraged. He struck the rock and sent forth a shower of sparks.

Then a fierce battle began. The eagles screeched, the little ones cried out loudly, the mountaineer yelled and waved his sword. He slashed at the birds with his blade, which gleamed like lightning, only making them even more furious. He struck the rock and sent a shower of sparks flying.

Suddenly he felt a jerk given to the cord that sustained him. Looking up he perceived that, in his evolutions, he had cut it with his sabre, and that half the strands were severed!

Suddenly, he felt a strong tug on the cord that was holding him up. Looking up, he realized that in his movements, he had sliced it with his saber, and that half of the strands were cut!

Pierre's eyes, dilated widely, remained for a moment immovable, and then closed with terror. A cold shudder passed through his veins, and he thought of letting go both the nest and the sabre.

Pierre's eyes, wide open, stayed fixed for a moment and then shut in fear. A cold shiver ran through him, and he considered releasing both the nest and the sword.

At that moment one of the eagles pounced on his head, and tried to tear his face. The Savoyard made a last effort, and defended himself bravely. He thought of his old father, and took courage.

At that moment, one of the eagles swooped down on his head and tried to claw at his face. The Savoyard made one last effort and fought back bravely. He thought of his elderly father and found his strength.

Upward, still upward, mounted the cord: friendly voices eagerly uttered words of encouragement and triumph; but Pierre could not reply to them. When he reached the brink of the precipice, still clasping fast the nest, his hair, which an hour before had been as black as a raven's wing, was become so completely white, that Guillaume and Jehan could scarcely recognize him.

Upward, still upward, climbed the rope: friendly voices eagerly offered words of encouragement and triumph; but Pierre couldn’t respond to them. When he reached the edge of the cliff, still tightly holding the nest, his hair, which an hour before had been as black as a raven’s wing, had turned completely white that Guillaume and Jehan could barely recognize him.

What did that signify? the eaglets were of the rarest and most valuable species. That same afternoon they were carried to the village and sold. Old Bernard had the medicine, and every needful comfort beside, and the doctor in a few days pronounced him convalescent.

What did that mean? The eaglets were from the rarest and most valuable species. That same afternoon, they were taken to the village and sold. Old Bernard had the medicine, along with every necessary comfort, and the doctor declared him on the mend in just a few days.


STORIES ABOUT BEASTS AND BIRDS.

The strength and courage of the lion is so great that, although he is seldom four feet in height, he is more than a match for fierce animals of three or four times his size, such as the buffalo. He will even attack a rhinoceros or an elephant, if provoked. He possesses such extraordinary muscular power, that he has been known to kill and carry off a heifer of two years old in his mouth, and, after being pursued by herdsmen on horseback for five hours, it has been found that he has scarcely ever allowed the body of the heifer to touch the ground during the whole distance. But here is an instance of strength in a man—a different sort of strength—which surpasses all we ever heard of a lion:

The lion's strength and courage are so impressive that, even though he's rarely four feet tall, he can take on fierce animals that are three or four times his size, like a buffalo. He'll even confront a rhinoceros or an elephant if he's provoked. He has such incredible muscle power that he's been known to kill and carry off a two-year-old heifer in his mouth, and after being chased by herdsmen on horseback for five hours, it turns out he hardly ever let the heifer's body touch the ground during the whole distance. But here's an example of strength in a man—a different kind of strength—that surpasses everything we've ever heard about a lion:

Three officers in the East Indies—Captain Woodhouse, Lieutenant Delamain, and Lieutenant Laing—being informed that two lions had made their appearance, in a jungle, at some twenty miles' distance from their cantonment, rode off in that direction to seek an engagement. They soon found the "lordly strangers," or natives, we should rather say. One of the lions was killed by the first volley they fired; the other retreated across the country. The officers pursued, until the lion, making an abrupt curve, returned to his jungle. They then mounted an elephant, and went in to search for him. They found him standing under a bush, looking directly toward them. He sought no conflict, but seeing them approach, he at once accepted the first challenge, and sprang at the elephant's head, where he hung on. The officers fired; in the excitement of the onset their aim was defeated, and the lion only wounded. The elephant, meanwhile, had shaken him off, and, not liking such an antagonist, refused to face him again. The lion did not pursue, but stood waiting. At length the elephant was persuaded to advance once more; seeing which, the lion became furious, and rushed to the contest. The elephant turned about to retreat, and the lion, springing upon him from behind, grappled his flesh with teeth and claws, and again hung on. The officers fired, while the elephant kicked with all his might; but, though the lion was dislodged, he was still without any mortal wound, and retired into the thicket, content with what he had done in return for the assault. The officers had become too excited to desist; and in the fever of the moment, as the elephant, for his part, now directly refused to have any thing more to do with the business, Captain Woodhouse resolved to dismount, and go on foot into the jungle. Lieutenant Delamain and Lieutenant Laing dismounted with him, and they followed in the direction the lion had taken. They presently got sight of him, and Captain Woodhouse fired, but apparently without any serious injury, as they saw "the mighty lord of the woods" retire deeper into the thicket "with the utmost composure." They pursued, and Lieutenant Delamain got a shot at the lion. This was to be endured no longer, and forth[Pg 141] came the lion, dashing right through the bushes that intervened, so that he was close upon them in no time. The two lieutenants were just able to escape out of the jungle to re-load, but Captain Woodhouse stood quietly on one side, hoping the lion would pass him unobserved. This was rather too much to expect after all he had done. The lion darted at him, and in an instant, "as though by a stroke of lightning," the rifle was broken and knocked out of his hand, and he found himself in the grip of the irresistible enemy whom he had challenged to mortal combat. Lieutenant Delamain fired at the lion without killing him, and then again retreated to re-load. Meantime, Captain Woodhouse and the lion were both lying wounded on the ground, and the lion began to craunch his arm. In this dreadful position Captain Woodhouse had the presence of mind, and the fortitude, amid the horrible pain he endured, to lie perfectly still—knowing that if he made any resistance now, he would be torn to pieces in a minute. Finding all motion had ceased, the lion let the arm drop from his mouth, and quietly crouched down with his paws on the thigh of his prostrate antagonist. Presently, Captain Woodhouse, finding his head in a painful position, unthinkingly raised one hand to support it, whereupon the lion again seized his arm, and craunched it higher up. Once more, notwithstanding the intense agony, and yet more intense apprehension of momentary destruction, Captain Woodhouse had the strength of will and self-command to lie perfectly still. He remained thus, until his friends, discovering his situation, were hastening up, but upon the wrong side, so that their balls might possibly pass through the lion, and hit him. Without moving, or manifesting any hasty excitement, he was heard to say, in a low voice, "To the other side!—to the other side!" They hurried round. Next moment the magnanimous lion lay dead by the side of a yet stronger nature than his own.

Three officers in the East Indies—Captain Woodhouse, Lieutenant Delamain, and Lieutenant Laing—learned that two lions had appeared in a jungle about twenty miles from their camp. They rode in that direction to find them. They quickly spotted the "lordly strangers," or as we should say, the lions. They killed one lion with their first shot, while the other retreated. The officers chased after it until the lion suddenly changed direction and returned to the jungle. They then got on an elephant and went searching for it. They found the lion standing under a bush, watching them. It didn’t want to fight but, seeing them approach, it decided to leap at the elephant's head and hung on. The officers fired, but in the excitement, they missed, only managing to injure the lion. Meanwhile, the elephant shook the lion off and, not wanting to deal with it, refused to face it again. The lion waited without pursuing. Eventually, they got the elephant to move forward again, prompting the lion to charge into the fight. The elephant turned to flee, and the lion leaped at it from behind, biting and clawing at its flesh while hanging on. The officers fired again as the elephant kicked desperately, but although the lion was dislodged, it didn’t have any serious wounds and retreated into the bushes, satisfied with what it had accomplished. The officers were too excited to stop; as the elephant now refused to engage any further, Captain Woodhouse decided to dismount and walk into the jungle. Lieutenant Delamain and Lieutenant Laing followed him, and they tracked the lion. They soon spotted it, and Captain Woodhouse shot, but it seemed to do no serious damage, as they watched "the mighty lord of the woods" calmly retreat deeper into the thicket. They pursued it, and Lieutenant Delamain managed to take a shot at the lion. This pushed the lion to the limit, and it burst through the bushes, closing in on them quickly. The two lieutenants barely escaped from the jungle to reload, but Captain Woodhouse stayed quiet, hoping the lion would pass by him without noticing. That was too much to expect after everything that had happened. The lion lunged at him, and in an instant, "as if struck by lightning," the rifle was knocked from his hand, and he found himself caught by the powerful beast he had challenged to fight. Lieutenant Delamain shot at the lion but didn’t kill it, then retreated to reload. Meanwhile, Captain Woodhouse and the lion were both wounded on the ground, and the lion began to gnaw on his arm. In this terrifying situation, Captain Woodhouse managed to stay completely still despite the excruciating pain, knowing that any struggle would lead to his immediate death. When the lion realized there was no movement, it dropped the arm from its mouth and settled down with its paws on Captain Woodhouse's thigh. After a while, he felt the pain in his neck and instinctively raised one hand to support his head, which caused the lion to grab his arm again and bite higher up. Once more, despite the intense agony and the looming fear of imminent death, Captain Woodhouse summoned the willpower to remain still. He stayed that way until his friends, discovering his predicament, rushed in from the wrong side, risking hitting him with their shots. Without moving or showing any panic, he quietly urged them, "To the other side!—to the other side!" They quickly changed direction. The next moment, the noble lion lay dead beside someone with even stronger instincts than its own.

Diedrik Müller, during his hunting time in South Africa, came suddenly upon a lion. The lion did not attack him, but stood still, as though he would have said, "Well, what do you want here in my desert?" Müller alighted from his horse, and took deliberate aim at the lion's forehead. Just as he drew the trigger, his horse gave a start of terror, and the hunter missed his aim. The lion sprang forward; but, finding that the man stood still—for he had no time either to remount his horse, or take to his heels—the lion stopped within a few paces, and stood still also, confronting him. The man and the lion stood looking at each other for some minutes; the man never moved; at length the lion slowly turned, and walked away. Müller began hastily to re-load his gun. The lion looked back over his shoulder, gave a deep growl, and instantly returned. Could words speak plainer? Müller, of course, held his hand, and remained motionless. The lion again moved off, warily. The hunter began softly to ram down his bullet. Again the lion looked back, and gave a threatening[Pg 142] growl. This was repeated between them until the lion had retired to some distance, when he bounded into a thicket.

Diedrik Müller, while he was hunting in South Africa, suddenly came across a lion. The lion didn't attack him but just stood there, as if to say, "What are you doing in my territory?" Müller got off his horse and took careful aim at the lion's forehead. Just as he was about to pull the trigger, his horse jumped in fear, and he missed. The lion charged forward, but when it saw that the man was still—since he had no time to get back on his horse or run away—the lion stopped just a few paces away and faced him. They stared at each other for several minutes; the man didn't move at all. Eventually, the lion slowly turned and walked away. Müller quickly started to reload his gun. The lion glanced back over its shoulder, let out a deep growl, and immediately returned. Could it be any clearer? Müller naturally froze and stayed still. The lion cautiously moved away again. The hunter began to quietly ram down his bullet. Once more, the lion looked back and gave a menacing growl. This back-and-forth continued until the lion had retreated to a safe distance and then leaped into a thicket.

A very curious question is started by the worthy vicar of Swaffham Bulbec on the mortality of birds. The mortality must be enormous every year, yet how seldom in our country rambles do we find a dead bird. One, now and then, in the woods or hedgerows, is the utmost seen by any body, even if he search for them. Very few, comparatively, are destroyed by mankind. Only a few species are killed by sportsmen; all the rest can not live long, nor can they all be eaten by other birds. Many must die from natural causes. Immense numbers, especially of the smaller birds, are born each year, yet they do not appear to increase the general stock of the species. Immense numbers, therefore, must die every year; but what becomes of the bodies? Martins, nightingales, and other migratory birds, may be supposed to leave a great number of their dead relations in foreign countries; this, however, can not apply to our own indigenous stock. Mr. Jenyns partly accounts for this by saying, that no doubt a great many young birds fall a prey to stronger birds soon after leaving the nest, and probably a number of the elder birds also; while the very old are killed by the cold of winter; or, becoming too feeble to obtain food, drop to the earth, and are spared the pain of starvation by being speedily carried off by some hungry creature of the woods and fields. Besides these means for the disposal of the bodies, there are scavenger insects, who devour, and another species who act as sextons, and bury the bodies. During the warm months of summer, some of the burying beetles will accomplish "the humble task allotted them by Providence," in a surprisingly short time. Mr. Jenyns has repeatedly, during a warm spring, placed dead birds upon the ground, in different spots frequented by the necrophorus vespillo, and other allied beetles, who have effected the interment so completely in four-and-twenty hours, that there was a difficulty in finding the bodies again.

A very interesting question is raised by the good vicar of Swaffham Bulbec regarding the death of birds. The number of bird deaths must be huge every year, yet how rarely do we find a dead bird during our walks in the countryside. One here and there in the woods or hedgerows is the most anyone sees, even if they’re actively looking for them. Comparatively few are killed by people. Only a handful of species are taken by hunters; the rest can’t live long, nor can they all be eaten by other birds. Many must die from natural causes. Countless numbers, especially of smaller birds, are born each year, yet they don't seem to increase the overall population of their species. So, a large number must die each year; but where do all the bodies go? Martins, nightingales, and other migratory birds probably leave many of their dead relatives in foreign lands; however, that doesn’t apply to our native birds. Mr. Jenyns offers part of an explanation by suggesting that many young birds fall victim to stronger birds shortly after leaving the nest, and likely some older birds do too; while the very old are killed by winter's cold; or, becoming too weak to find food, they fall to the ground and are quickly taken away by a hungry creature from the woods and fields, thus avoiding the suffering of starvation. In addition to these ways of disposing of the bodies, there are scavenger insects that devour them, and another type that acts as undertakers, burying the bodies. During the warm summer months, some of the burying beetles accomplish "the humble task assigned to them by Providence" in a surprisingly short time. Mr. Jenyns has often, during a warm spring, placed dead birds on the ground in various spots where the necrophorus vespillo and other related beetles are found, and they have buried them so thoroughly in twenty-four hours that it became difficult to find the bodies again.

All this goes a great way to account for our so very seldom seeing any dead birds lying about, notwithstanding the immense mortality that must take place every year; but it certainly is not satisfactory; for although the birds of prey, and those which are not devoured by others, are comparatively small in number, how is it that none of these are ever found? Once in a season, perhaps, we may find a dead crow, or a dead owl (generally one that has been shot), but who ever finds hawks, ravens, kites, sparrow-hawks, or any number of crows, out of all the annual mortality that must occur in their colonies? These birds are for the most part too large for the sexton beetle to bury; and, quickly as the foxes, stoats, weasels, and other prowling creatures would nose out the savoury remains, or the newly-fallen bodies, these creatures only inhabit certain localities—and dead[Pg 143] birds may be supposed to fall in many places. Still, they are not seen.

All this really explains why we rarely see any dead birds around, despite the huge number of deaths that must happen every year; however, it's definitely not satisfying. Because even though the birds of prey and those that aren't eaten by others are relatively few, why is it that we never find any of these? Maybe once a season, we might come across a dead crow or an owl (usually one that got shot), but who actually finds hawks, ravens, kites, sparrow-hawks, or any of the many crows, from all the annual deaths that must occur in their groups? These birds are mostly too big for the sexton beetle to bury, and as quickly as foxes, stoats, weasels, and other scavengers would find the tasty remains or the freshly fallen bodies, these animals only live in certain areas—and dead[Pg 143] birds are likely to drop in many different places. Yet, they remain unseen.

A pair of robins built their nest in the old ivy of a garden wall, and the hen shortly afterward sat in maternal pride upon four eggs. The gardener came to clip the ivy; and, not knowing of the nest, his shears cut off a part of it, so that the four eggs fell to the ground. Dropping on leaves, they were not broken. Notice being attracted by the plaintive cries of the hen bird, the eggs were restored to the nest, which the gardener repaired. The robins returned, the hen sat upon the eggs, and in a few days they were hatched. Shortly afterward the four little ones were all found lying upon the ground beneath, cold, stiff, and lifeless. The gardener's repairs of the nest had not been according to the laws of bird-architecture, and a gap had broken out. The four unfledged little ones were taken into the house, and, efforts being made to revive them by warmth, they presently showed signs of life, recovered, and were again restored to the nest. The gap was filled up by stuffing a small piece of drugget into it. The parent robins, perched in a neighboring tree, watched all these operations, without displaying any alarm for the result, and, as soon as they were completed, returned to the nest. All went on well for a day or two: but misfortune seemed never weary of tormenting this little family. A violent shower of rain fell. The nest being exposed, by the close clipping of the ivy leaves, the drugget got sopped, the rain half filled the nest, and the gardener found the four little ones lying motionless in the water. Once more they were taken away, dried near the fire, and placed in the nest of another bird fixed in a tree opposite the ivy. The parent birds in a few minutes occupied the nest, and never ceased their attentions until the brood were able to fly, and take care of themselves.

A pair of robins built their nest in the old ivy on a garden wall, and shortly after, the female sat proudly on four eggs. The gardener came to trim the ivy, and not knowing about the nest, accidentally cut part of it off, causing the four eggs to fall to the ground. Fortunately, they landed on leaves and didn’t break. Hearing the distressed calls of the hen, the gardener returned the eggs to the nest and fixed it up. The robins came back, the hen sat on the eggs, and a few days later, they hatched. Soon after, the four little ones were found on the ground below, cold, stiff, and lifeless. The gardener's repairs hadn’t followed the right principles of bird architecture, leaving a gap. The four unfeathered chicks were taken inside, and after efforts to warm them up, they began to show signs of life, recovered, and were placed back in the nest. The gap was filled by stuffing a small piece of fabric into it. The parent robins perched in a nearby tree, watching the whole process without showing any concern, and once it was done, they returned to the nest. Everything went well for a day or two, but misfortune seemed to haunt this little family. A heavy rainstorm hit. With the ivy leaves trimmed close, the nest became exposed, the fabric got soaked, the rain filled the nest halfway, and the gardener discovered the four little ones lying still in the water. Once again, they were taken inside, dried by the fire, and placed in the nest of another bird located in a tree across from the ivy. The parent birds quickly took over the nest and didn’t stop caring for the chicks until they were able to fly and fend for themselves.

The story we have already related of Diedrik Müller's lion, is surpassed by another of a similar kind, which we take to be about the best lion-story that zoological records can furnish.

The story we've already shared about Diedrik Müller's lion is topped by another one that's quite similar, which we believe is the best lion story that zoological records can provide.

A hunter, in the wilds of Africa, had seated himself on a bank near a pool, to rest, leaving his gun, set upright against a rock, a few feet behind him. He was alone. Whether he fell asleep, or only into a reverie, he did not know, but suddenly he saw an enormous lion standing near him, attentively observing him. Their eyes met, and thus they remained, motionless, looking at each other. At length the hunter leaned back, and slowly extended his arm toward his gun. The lion instantly uttered a deep growl, and advanced nearer. The hunter paused. After a time, he very gradually repeated the attempt, and again the lion uttered a deep growl, the meaning of which was not to be mistaken. This occurred several times (as in the former case), until the man was obliged to desist altogether. Night approached; the lion never left him the whole night. Day broke; the lion still was there, and remained there the whole day. The hunter had ceased to make any attempt to seize his gun, and[Pg 144] saw that his only hope was to weary the lion out by the fortitude of a passive state, however dreadful the situation. All the next night the lion remained. The man, worn out for want of sleep, dared not to close his eyes, lest the lion, believing him to be dead, should devour him. All the provision in his wallet was exhausted. The third night arrived. Being now utterly exhausted, and having dropped off to sleep, several times, and as often come back to consciousness with a start of horror at finding he had been asleep, he finally sunk backward, and lay in a dead slumber. He never awoke till broad day, and then found that the lion was gone.

A hunter in the African wilderness had settled himself on a bank next to a pool to rest, leaving his gun propped up against a rock a few feet behind him. He was alone. He wasn't sure if he had fallen asleep or was just daydreaming, but suddenly he noticed a huge lion standing nearby, watching him intently. Their eyes locked, and they stayed that way, motionless, staring at one another. Eventually, the hunter leaned back and slowly reached for his gun. The lion immediately let out a deep growl and moved in closer. The hunter hesitated. After a while, he carefully tried again, but the lion growled again, making it clear he wasn't welcome to continue. This happened several times, just like before, until the hunter had no choice but to stop altogether. Night came; the lion stayed with him the entire night. Daybreak arrived, and the lion was still there, remaining all day. The hunter had given up trying to grab his gun and realized his only option was to outlast the lion by staying passive, no matter how terrifying the situation was. The lion stayed through the entire next night. The man, exhausted from lack of sleep, was too afraid to close his eyes, fearing the lion might think he was dead and attack him. He had run out of food in his wallet. The third night came. Completely worn out, he dozed off several times, each time jolting awake in terror at the thought of having been asleep. Eventually, he collapsed backward and fell into a deep sleep. He didn't wake up until broad daylight, only to find that the lion was gone.

On the question of "best" stories of animals, there are so many excellent stories of several species that the superlative degree may be hard to determine. Setting down the above, however, as the best lion-story, we will give what we consider to be (up to this time) the best elephant-story. In one of the recent accounts of scenes of Indian warfare (the title of the book has escaped us, and perhaps we met with the narrative in a printed letter), a body of artillery was described as proceeding up a hill, and the great strength of elephants was found highly advantageous in drawing up the guns. On the carriage of one of these guns, a little in front of the wheel, sat an artilleryman, resting himself. An elephant, drawing another gun, was advancing in regular order close behind. Whether from falling asleep, or over-fatigue, the man fell from his seat, and the wheel of the gun-carriage, with its heavy gun, was just rolling over him. The elephant comprehending the danger, and seeing that he could not reach the body of the man with his trunk, seized the wheel by the top, and, lifting it up, passed it carefully over the fallen man, and set it down on the other side.

On the topic of "best" animal stories, there are so many amazing tales from various species that it can be tough to choose one. However, considering the above as the top lion story, we will share what we believe is, so far, the best elephant story. In one of the recent accounts of Indian warfare (we can’t recall the title of the book, and we might have come across the story in a printed letter), a group of artillery was described as moving up a hill, and the incredible strength of elephants was found to be very helpful in hauling the guns. On the carriage of one of these guns, just in front of the wheel, sat an artilleryman resting. An elephant, pulling another gun, was advancing in perfect alignment just behind. Whether he fell asleep or was overly fatigued, the man tumbled from his seat, and the wheel of the gun carriage, with its heavy gun, was about to roll over him. The elephant, understanding the danger, saw that he couldn’t reach the man’s body with his trunk, so he grabbed the wheel by the top and carefully lifted it over the fallen man, setting it down on the other side.

The best dog-story—though there are a number of best stories of this honest fellow—we fear is an old one; but we can not forbear telling it, for the benefit of those who may not have met with it before. A surgeon found a poor dog, with his leg broken. He took him home, set it, and in due time gave him his liberty. Off he ran. Some months afterward the surgeon was awoke in the night by a dog barking loudly at his door. As the barking continued, and the surgeon thought he recognized the voice, he got up, and went down stairs. When he opened the door, there stood his former patient, wagging his tail, and by his side another dog—a friend whom he had brought—who had also had the misfortune to get a leg broken. There is another dog-story of a different kind, told by Mr. Jenyns, which we think very amusing. A poodle, belonging to a gentleman in Cheshire, was in the habit of going to church with his master, and sitting with him in the pew during the whole service. Sometimes his master did not come; but this did not prevent the poodle, who always presented himself in good time, entered the pew, and remained sitting there alone: departing with the rest of the congregation. One Sunday, the dam at the head of a lake in the neighborhood gave way, and the whole[Pg 145] road was inundated. The congregation was therefore reduced to a few individuals, who came from cottages close at hand. Nevertheless, by the time the clergyman had commenced reading the Psalms, he saw his friend the poodle come slowly up the aisle, dripping with water: having been obliged to swim above a quarter of a mile to get to church. He went into his pew, as usual, and remained quietly there to the end of the service. This is told on the authority of the clergyman himself.

The best dog story—though there are many great stories about this honest pup—we’re afraid is an old one; but we can't help sharing it for those who may not have heard it before. A surgeon found a poor dog with a broken leg. He took him home, fixed it, and eventually set him free. Off he ran. A few months later, the surgeon was woken in the night by a dog barking loudly at his door. As the barking continued and he thought he recognized the voice, he got up and went downstairs. When he opened the door, there stood his former patient, wagging his tail, and beside him was another dog—a friend he had brought along—who had also suffered the misfortune of a broken leg. There's another dog story of a different kind, told by Mr. Jenyns, that we find very amusing. A poodle belonging to a gentleman in Cheshire used to go to church with his master and sit with him in the pew throughout the service. Sometimes his master wouldn’t come, but that didn’t stop the poodle, who always showed up on time, entered the pew, and stayed there by himself, leaving with the rest of the congregation. One Sunday, the dam at the head of a lake in the area broke, and the entire road was flooded. The congregation was reduced to just a few people who came from nearby cottages. However, by the time the clergyman started reading the Psalms, he saw his friend the poodle slowly making his way up the aisle, dripping wet after swimming over a quarter of a mile to get to church. He went into his pew as usual and stayed quietly there until the end of the service. This is recounted on the authority of the clergyman himself.

A hungry jackdaw once took a fancy to a young chicken which had only recently been hatched. He pounced upon it accordingly, and was carrying it off, when the hen rushed upon him, and beat him with her wings, and held him in her beak, until the cock came up, who immediately attacked the jackdaw, and struck him so repeatedly that he was scarcely able to effect his escape by flight. But the best hen-story is one in Mr. Jenyns' "Observations." A hen was sitting on a number of eggs to hatch them. An egg was missing every night; yet nobody could conjecture who had stolen it. One morning, after several had been lost in this way, the hen was discovered with ruffled feathers, a bleeding breast, and an inflamed countenance. By the side of the nest was seen the dead body of a large rat, whose skull had been fractured—evidently by blows from the beak of the valiant hen, who could endure the vile act of piracy no longer.

A hungry jackdaw once took an interest in a young chicken that had just been hatched. He pounced on it and started to carry it away when the hen charged at him, flapping her wings and holding him in her beak until the rooster arrived. He immediately attacked the jackdaw, hitting him so many times that he barely managed to escape by flying away. But the best hen story is in Mr. Jenyns' "Observations." A hen was sitting on a bunch of eggs to hatch them. Every night, one egg went missing, but no one could figure out who was stealing them. One morning, after several had been taken, the hen was found with ruffled feathers, a bleeding breast, and an inflamed face. Next to the nest was the dead body of a large rat, its skull clearly smashed—evidently from blows by the brave hen, who could no longer tolerate the despicable act of theft.

Mr. Jenyns relates a good owl-story. He knew a tame owl, who was so fond of music that he would enter the drawing-room of an evening, and, perching on the shoulder of one of the children, listen with great attention to the tones of the piano-forte: holding his head first on one side, then on the other, after the manner of connoisseurs. One night, suddenly, spreading his wings, as if unable to endure his rapture any longer, he alighted on the keys, and, driving away the fingers of the performer with his beak, began to hop about upon the keys himself, apparently in great delight with his own execution. This pianist's name was Keevie. He was born in the woods of Northumberland, and belonged to a friend of the Reverend Mr. Jenyns.

Mr. Jenyns shares a great story about an owl. He had a pet owl that loved music so much that every evening it would walk into the living room, perch on one of the children's shoulders, and listen intently to the sounds of the piano. The owl would tilt its head from side to side, just like a music expert. One night, suddenly, it spread its wings as if it couldn't contain its excitement any longer and landed on the piano keys. It pushed the performer's fingers away with its beak and started hopping around on the keys itself, clearly thrilled with its own performance. The pianist's name was Keevie. He was born in the woods of Northumberland and belonged to a friend of the Reverend Mr. Jenyns.

Good bear-stories are numerous. One of the best we take from the "Zoological Anecdotes." At a hunt in Sweden, an old soldier was charged by a bear. His musket missed fire, and the animal being close upon him, he made a thrust, in the hope of driving the muzzle of his piece down the bear's throat. But the thrust was parried by one of huge paws with all the skill of a fencer, and the musket wrested from the soldier's hand, who was forthwith laid prostrate. He lay quiet, and the bear, after smelling, thought he was dead, and then left him to examine the musket. This he seized by the stock, and began to knock about, as though to discover wherein its virtue consisted, when the soldier could not forbear putting forth one hand to recover his weapon. The bear immediately seized him by the back of the head, and tore his scalp over his crown, so that it fell over the[Pg 146] soldier's face. Notwithstanding his agony, the poor fellow restrained his cries, and again pretended death. The bear laid himself upon his body, and thus remained, until some hunters coming up relieved him from this frightful situation. As the poor fellow rose, he threw back his scalp with his hand, as though it had been a peruke, and ran frantically toward them, exclaiming—"The bear! the bear!" So intense was his apprehension of his enemy, that it made him oblivious of his bodily anguish. He eventually recovered, and received his discharge in consequence of his loss of hair. There is another bear-story in this work, which savors—just a little—of romance. A powerful bull was attacked by a bear in a forest, when the bull succeeded in striking both horns into his assailant, and pinning him to a tree. In this situation they were both found dead—the bear, of his wounds; the bull (either fearing, or, from obstinate self-will, refusing, to relinquish his position of advantage) of starvation!

Good bear stories are plentiful. One of the best comes from the "Zoological Anecdotes." During a hunt in Sweden, an old soldier was charged by a bear. His musket misfired, and with the bear close to him, he lunged forward, hoping to shove the muzzle of his gun down the bear's throat. But the bear skillfully deflected the attack with one of its massive paws, wrenching the musket from the soldier's grasp, leaving him flat on the ground. He lay still, and the bear, after sniffing him, assumed he was dead and moved on to investigate the musket. Grabbing it by the stock, the bear started to swing it around, trying to figure out what made it special, when the soldier couldn’t help but reach out for his weapon. The bear instantly grabbed him by the back of the head, ripping his scalp off so that it fell over the soldier’s face. Despite the pain, the poor man stifled his cries and pretended to be dead again. The bear laid on top of him and stayed there until some hunters arrived and rescued him from this terrifying situation. As the soldier got up, he flipped his scalp back with his hand, as if it were a wig, and ran toward them frantically, shouting, “The bear! The bear!” His fear of the bear was so intense that he forgot about his physical pain. He eventually healed and was discharged due to his loss of hair. There’s another bear story in this book that has just a hint of romance. A strong bull was attacked by a bear in a forest; the bull managed to jab both horns into the bear, pinning it to a tree. They were later found dead together—the bear from its wounds, and the bull, either out of fear or stubbornness, refusing to let go of its advantageous position, from starvation!

The beat cat-and-mouse story (designated "Melancholy Accident—a Cat killed by a Mouse") is to be found in "The Poor Artist," the author of which seems to have derived the story from a somewhat questionable source, though we must admit the possibility. "A cat had caught a mouse on a lawn, and let it go again, in her cruel way, in order to play with it; when the mouse, inspired by despair, and seeing only one hole possible to escape into—namely, the round red throat of the cat, very visible through her open mouth—took a bold spring into her jaws, just escaping between her teeth, and into her throat he struggled and stuffed himself; and so the cat was suffocated." It reads plausibly; let us imagine it was true.

The classic cat-and-mouse story (titled "Melancholy Accident—a Cat Killed by a Mouse") is found in "The Poor Artist," which the author appears to have taken from a somewhat dubious source, though we must acknowledge the possibility. "A cat caught a mouse on a lawn and then released it, cruelly, to play with it; when the mouse, driven by despair and seeing only one escape route—the cat’s wide-open mouth—made a daring leap into her jaws, just dodging her teeth, and squeezed himself into her throat; and so the cat choked." It sounds believable; let's just imagine it's true.

The best spider-and-fly story we also take from the last-named book. "A very strong, loud, blustering fellow of a blue-bottle fly bounced accidentally into a spider's web. Down ran the old spider, and threw her long arms round his neck; but he fought, and struggled, and blew his drone, and fuzzed, and sung sharp, and beat, and battered, and tore the web in holes—and so got loose. The spider would not let go her hold round him—and the fly flew away with the spider!" This is related on the authority of Mr. Thomas Bell, the naturalist, who witnessed the heroic act.

The best spider-and-fly story also comes from the last-named book. "A very strong, loud, brash bluebottle fly accidentally got caught in a spider's web. Down came the old spider, wrapping her long arms around his neck; but he fought, struggled, buzzed, and made a fuss, beating and battering the web until he finally tore free. The spider wouldn’t let go of her grip on him—and the fly flew away with the spider!" This is reported by Mr. Thomas Bell, the naturalist, who witnessed the heroic event.


A MISER'S LIFE AND DEATH.

This is Harrow Weal Common; and a lovely spot it is. Time was when the whole extent lay waste, or rather covered with soft herbage and wild flowers, where the bee sought her pasture, and the lark loved to hide her nest. But since then, cultivation has trenched on much of Harrow Weal. Cottages have risen, and small homesteads tell of security and abundance. It is pleasant to look upon them from this rising ground; to follow the windings of the broad stream, with pastures on either side, where sheep and cattle graze. Look narrowly toward yonder group of trees, and that slight elevation of the[Pg 147] ground covered with wild chamomile; if the narrator who told concerning the miser of Harrow Weal Common has marked the spot aright, that mound and flowers are associated with the history of one whose profitless life affords a striking instance of the withering effects of avarice.

This is Harrow Weal Common, and it's a beautiful place. There was a time when the entire area was either wasteland or covered with soft grass and wildflowers, where bees found their food and larks liked to hide their nests. But since then, farming has taken over much of Harrow Weal. Cottages have been built, and small farms show signs of safety and plenty. It’s nice to look at them from this hill, to trace the path of the wide stream with pastures on both sides, where sheep and cattle graze. If you look closely at that group of trees and the slight rise of the ground covered with wild chamomile; if the storyteller who spoke about the miser of Harrow Weal Common remembered the spot correctly, that mound and those flowers are linked to the tale of someone whose unfulfilled life is a powerful example of the damaging effects of greed.

On that spot stood the house of Daniel Dancer; miserable in the fullest conception of the word: desolate and friendless, for no bright fire gleamed in winter on the old man's hearthstone; nor yet in spring, when all nature is redolent of bliss, did the confiding sparrow build her nest beside his thatch. The walls of his solitary dwelling were old and lichen-dotted; ferns sprung from out their fissures, and creeping ivy twined through the shattered window-panes. A sapling, no one knew how, had vegetated in the kitchen; its broken pavement afforded a free passage, and, as time went on, the sapling acquired strength, pushing its tall head through the damp and mouldering ceiling; then, catching more of air and light, it went upward to the roof, and, finding that the tiles were off and part of the rafters broken, that same tree looked forth in its youth and vigor, throwing its branches wide, and serving, as years passed on, to shelter the inmates of the hut.

On that spot stood the house of Daniel Dancer; miserable in every sense of the word: desolate and friendless, for no warm fire glowed in winter on the old man's hearth; nor did the trusting sparrow build her nest beside his thatch in spring, when all nature is full of joy. The walls of his lonely home were old and covered in lichen; ferns grew from their cracks, and creeping ivy wrapped through the broken window panes. A sapling, mysteriously, had taken root in the kitchen; its cracked floor allowed it to grow freely, and over time, the sapling gained strength, pushing its tall head through the damp and rotting ceiling; then, reaching for more air and light, it climbed up to the roof, and, finding that the tiles were missing and part of the rafters broken, that same tree emerged in its youth and vitality, spreading its branches wide, and as the years went by, providing shelter for the inhabitants of the hut.

Other trees grew round; unpruned and thickly-tangled rank grass sprang up wherever the warm sunbeams found an entrance; and as far as the eye could reach, appeared a wilderness of docks and brambles, with huge plantains and giant thistles, inclosed with a boundary hedge of such amazing height as wholly to exclude all further prospect.

Other trees grew round; unpruned and thickly tangled, tall grass sprang up wherever the warm sunbeams got through; and as far as the eye could see, there was a wild area filled with docks and brambles, along with huge plantains and giant thistles, surrounded by a boundary hedge so tall that it completely blocked any further view.

Eighty acres of good land belonged to Dancer's farm. An ample stream once held its winding course among them, but becoming choked at the further end with weeds and fallen leaves, and branches broken by the wind, it spread into a marsh, tenanted alike by the slow, creeping blind-worm, and water-newt, the black slug, and frogs of portentous size. The soil was rich, and would have yielded abundantly; the timber, too, was valuable, for some of the finest oaks, perhaps, in the kingdom grew upon the farm; but the cultivation of the one, and the culling of the other, was attended with expense, and both were consequently left uncared for.

Eighty acres of good land belonged to Dancer's farm. A once-clear stream meandered through it, but over time it became clogged with weeds, fallen leaves, and branches broken by the wind, turning into a marsh that was home to slow-moving blind-worms, water-newts, black slugs, and frogs of impressive size. The soil was rich and could have produced plenty, and the timber was valuable too, as some of the finest oaks in the kingdom grew on the farm. However, cultivating the land and managing the trees came with costs, so both were left neglected.

In the centre of this lone and wretched spot, dwelt the miserable Dancer and his sister, alike in their habits and penuriousness. The sister never went from home; the brother rarely, except to sell his hay. He had some acres of fine meadow-land, upon which the brambles had not trenched, and his attention was exclusively devoted to keeping them clear of weeds. Having no other occupation, the time of hay-harvest seems to have been the only period at which his mind was engrossed with business, and this too was rendered remarkable by the miser's laying aside his habits of penuriousness—scarcely any gentleman in the neighborhood gave his mowers better beer, or in greater quantity; but at no other time was the beverage of our Saxon ancestors found within his walls.

In the middle of this lonely and miserable place, lived the unfortunate Dancer and his sister, who were alike in their routines and poverty. The sister never left the house; the brother went out rarely, except to sell his hay. He owned some acres of beautiful meadowland, untouched by brambles, and he focused all his efforts on keeping it clear of weeds. With no other job, hay-harvest season was the only time his mind was preoccupied with work, and even then it was notable because the miser let go of his stingy ways—hardly any gentleman in the area treated his mowers with better beer or provided more of it; but at no other time was the drink of our Saxon ancestors found in his home.

Some people thought that the old man was crazed; but those who knew him spoke well of his intelligence. As his father had been before him, so was he; his mantle had descended in darkness and in fullness on all who bore his name, and while that of Daniel Dancer was perhaps the most familiar, his three brothers were equally penurious. One sordid passion absorbed their every faculty; they loved money solely and exclusively for its own sake, not for the pleasures it could procure, nor yet because of the power it bestowed, but for the love of hoarding.

Some people thought the old man was crazy; but those who knew him spoke highly of his intelligence. Just like his father before him, he carried a legacy shrouded in darkness and abundance for anyone with his last name, and while Daniel Dancer was probably the most well-known, his three brothers were just as poor. They were consumed by one grim obsession; they loved money purely and entirely for its own sake, not for the pleasures it could bring, nor for the power it provided, but simply for the joy of saving it up.

When the father of Daniel Dancer breathed his last, there was reason to believe that a large sum, amounting to some thousands, was concealed on the premises. This conjecture occasioned his son no small uneasiness, not so much from the fear of loss, as from the apprehension lest his brothers should find the treasure and divide it among themselves. Dancer, therefore, kept the matter as much as possible to himself. He warily and secretly sought out every hole and corner, thrusting his skinny hand into many a deserted mouse-hole, and examining every part of the chimney. Vain were all his efforts, till at length, on removing an old grate, he discovered about two hundred pounds, in gold and bank-notes, between two pewter dishes. Much more undoubtedly there was, but the rest remained concealed.

When Daniel Dancer's father passed away, there were reasons to think that a significant amount of money, possibly several thousand, was hidden in the house. This thought made Daniel quite anxious, not so much because he feared losing it, but because he worried that his brothers might find the treasure and split it among themselves. So, Dancer kept the whole thing to himself as much as he could. He carefully and secretly searched every nook and cranny, shoving his thin hand into many abandoned mouse holes and checking every part of the chimney. All his efforts were in vain until finally, after removing an old grate, he found around two hundred pounds in gold and bank notes hidden between two pewter plates. There was likely much more, but the rest remained undiscovered.

Strange beings were Dancer and his sister to look upon. The person of the old man was generally girt with a hay-band, in order to keep together his tattered garments; his stockings were so darned and patched that nothing of the original texture remained; they were girt about in cold and wet weather with strong bands of hay, which served instead of boots, and his hat having been worn for at least thirteen years, scarcely retained a vestige of its former shape. Perhaps the most wretched vagabond and mendicant that ever crossed Harrow Weal Common was more decently attired than this miserable representative of an ancient and honorable house.

Strange beings were Dancer and his sister to look at. The old man was usually wrapped in a hay band to hold his ragged clothes together; his stockings were so darned and patched that nothing of the original fabric was left. In cold and wet weather, he wore strong bands of hay around his legs instead of boots, and his hat, worn for at least thirteen years, barely kept any shape. Perhaps the most wretched vagabond and beggar who ever crossed Harrow Weal Common was dressed more decently than this pitiable figure from an ancient and honorable family.

The sister possessed an excellent wardrobe, consisting not only of wearing apparel, but table linen, and twenty-four pair of good sheets; she had also clothes of various kinds, and abundance of plate belonging to the family, but every thing was stowed away in chests. Neither the brother nor the sister had the disposition or the heart to enjoy the blessings that were liberally given them; and hence it happened that Dancer was rarely seen, and that his sister scarcely ever quitted her obscure abode.

The sister had a great wardrobe, filled not just with clothes but also table linens and twenty-four pairs of nice sheets. She also had various types of clothes and plenty of family silverware, but everything was packed away in chests. Neither the brother nor the sister had the inclination or the desire to appreciate the gifts they had; as a result, Dancer was rarely seen, and his sister hardly ever left her hidden home.

The interior of the dwelling well befitted its occupants. Furniture, and that of a good description, had formerly occupied a place within the walls, but every article had long since been carefully secluded from the light, all excepting two antique bedsteads which could not readily be removed. These, however, neither Dancer nor his sister could be prevailed to occupy; they preferred sleeping on sacks stuffed with hay, and covered with horse-rugs. Nor less miserable was their daily fare. Though possessed of at least[Pg 149] ten thousand pounds, they lived on cold dumplings, hard as stone, and made of the coarsest meal; their only beverage was water; their sole fire a few sticks gathered on the common, although they had abundance of wood, and noble trees that required lopping.

The inside of the house suited its residents perfectly. There used to be nice furniture filling the space, but every piece had long been kept out of sight, except for two old bedsteads that couldn’t easily be moved. However, neither Dancer nor his sister would agree to sleep in them; they chose to sleep on sacks filled with hay, covered with horse blankets instead. Their daily meals were just as grim. Even though they had at least[Pg 149] ten thousand pounds, they lived on cold dumplings that were as hard as rocks, made from the coarsest flour; their only drink was water, and the only source of warmth was a few sticks gathered from the common, even though they had plenty of wood and big trees that needed trimming.

Thus they lived, isolated from mankind, while around them the desolation of their paternal acres, and the rank luxuriance of weeds and brambles, presented a mournful emblem of their condition. Talents, undoubtedly they had; kindly tempers in early life, which might have conduced to the well-being of society. Daniel especially possessed many admirable qualities, with good sense and native integrity; his manners, too, though unpolished by intercourse with the world, were at one time both frank and courteous, but all and each were absorbed by one master passion—sordid avarice took possession of his soul, and rendered him the most despicable of men.

Thus they lived, cut off from other people, while around them the neglect of their ancestral land and the overgrowth of weeds and brambles served as a sad reminder of their situation. They definitely had talents; they had kind dispositions in their youth that could have contributed positively to society. Daniel, in particular, had many admirable traits, including good judgment and natural integrity; his manners, although not refined by social interactions, were once both straightforward and polite. However, all of these qualities were consumed by one overwhelming passion—greed took over his spirit, making him the most contemptible of men.

At length Dancer's sister died. They had lived together for many years, similar in their penuriousness, though little, perhaps, of natural affection subsisted between them. The sister was possessed of considerable wealth, which she left to her brother. The old man greatly rejoiced at its acquisition; he resolved, in consequence, that her funeral should not disgrace the family, and accordingly contracted with an undertaker to receive timber in exchange for a coffin, rather than to part with gold.

At last, Dancer's sister passed away. They had lived together for many years, both living in poverty, though there wasn't much natural affection between them. The sister had a substantial amount of money, which she left to her brother. The old man was very pleased about this inheritance; he decided that her funeral should honor the family, so he arranged with a funeral director to trade timber for a coffin instead of spending any cash.

Lady Tempest, who resided in the neighborhood, compassionating the wretched condition of an aged woman, sick, and destitute of even pauper comforts, had the poor creature conveyed to her house. Every possible alleviation was afforded, and medical assistance immediately obtained; but they came too late. The disease, which proceeded originally from want, proved mortal, and the victim of sordid avarice was borne unlamented to her grave.

Lady Tempest, who lived in the area, felt sorry for an elderly woman who was ill and had nothing, not even the comforts given to the poorest. She had the unfortunate woman brought to her home. Every possible comfort was provided, and medical help was quickly called; but it was too late. The illness, which had started from poverty, turned out to be fatal, and the victim of greed was taken to her grave without anyone mourning her loss.

There was crowding on the funeral day beside the road that led to Lady Tempest's. People came trooping from far and near, with a company of boys belonging to Harrow School, thoughtless, and amused with the strangeness of a spectacle which might rather have excited feelings of sorrow and commiseration. First came a coffin of the humblest kind, containing the emaciated corpse of one who had possessed ample wealth—a woman to whom had been committed the magnificent gift of life, fair talents, and health, with faculties for appropriating each to the glory of Him who gave them, but who, on dying, had no soothing retrospect of life, no thankfulness for having been the instrument of good to others, no hope beyond the grave. Behind that coffin, as chief-mourner, followed the brother, unbeloved, and heedless of all duties either to God or man—a miserable being; the possessor of many thousands, yet too sordid to purchase even decent mourning. It was only by the importunate entreaties of his relatives that he consented to unbind the hay-bands with which his legs were covered, and to put on a second-hand[Pg 150] pair of black worsted stockings. His coat was of a whitish brown color, his waistcoat had been black about the middle of the last century, and the covering of his head was a nondescript kind of wig, which had descended to him as an heirloom. Thus attired, and followed and attended by a crowd whom curiosity had drawn together, went on old Daniel and the coffin of his sister toward the place of its sojourn. When there, the horse's girth gave way, for they were past all service, and the brother was suddenly precipitated into his sister's grave; but the old man escaped unhurt. The service proceeded; and slowly into darkness and forgetfulness went down the remains of his miserable counterpart.

There was a crowd on the day of the funeral beside the road leading to Lady Tempest's. People came from all directions, including a group of boys from Harrow School, who were thoughtless and amused by the oddity of a scene that should have inspired feelings of grief and compassion. First, a very simple coffin came through, holding the thin body of someone who had once had great wealth—a woman who was given the precious gift of life, natural talents, and good health, with the ability to use them for the glory of the one who gave them. Yet, in death, she had no comforting memories of her life, no gratitude for having done good for others, and no hope for anything beyond the grave. Following that coffin, as the main mourner, was her brother, unloved and indifferent to any responsibilities to God or man—a wretched man; he had many thousands but was too cheap to even buy proper mourning attire. It took persistent pleading from his relatives before he agreed to remove the hay-bands from his legs and put on a second-hand pair of black wool stockings. His coat was a faded brown color, his waistcoat had been black in the middle of the last century, and he wore a vague type of wig that had been passed down to him as a family heirloom. So dressed, and followed by a crowd attracted by curiosity, old Daniel and his sister's coffin made their way to the burial site. When they arrived, the horse’s girth broke, as it was beyond use, and the brother suddenly fell into his sister’s grave; however, the old man remained unharmed. The service continued; and slowly, the remains of his unfortunate counterpart descended into darkness and oblivion.

One friend, however, remained to the miser—and this was Lady Tempest. That noble-minded woman had given a home to the sister, and sought by every possible means to alleviate her sufferings; now also, when the object of her solicitude was gone, she endeavored to inspire the brother with better feelings, and to ameliorate his miserable condition. This kindly notice by Lady Tempest, while it soothed his pride, served also to lessen the sufferings and sorrows of his declining age; and so far did her representations prevail, that, having given him a comfortable bed, she actually induced him to throw away the sack on which he slept for years. Nay, more, he took into his service a man of the name of Griffith, and allowed him an ample supply of food, but neither cat nor dog purred or watched beneath his roof; he had no kindliness of heart to bestow upon them, nor occasion for their services, for he still continued to live on crusts and fragments; even when Lady Tempest sent him better fare, he could hardly be prevailed to partake of it.

One friend, however, stayed loyal to the miser—and that was Lady Tempest. This kind-hearted woman had taken in his sister and tried every way possible to ease her pain; now, when the one she cared for was gone, she worked to inspire better feelings in the brother and improve his miserable situation. Lady Tempest's kind attention, while it soothed his pride, also helped lessen the suffering and sadness of his old age. Her efforts were so effective that, after providing him with a comfortable bed, she actually convinced him to get rid of the sack he had slept on for years. Furthermore, he hired a man named Griffith and gave him plenty of food, but not a single cat or dog would purr or linger under his roof; he had no kindness to offer them, nor any need for their companionship, as he continued to live off scraps and remnants. Even when Lady Tempest sent him better food, he could hardly be persuaded to eat it.

In his boyish days, he possessed, it might be, some natural feelings of affection toward his kind; but as years passed on, and his sordid avarice increased, he manifested the utmost aversion for his brother, who rivaled himself in penury and wealth, and still continued to pasture sheep on the same common. To his niece, however, he once presented a guinea, on the birth of a daughter, but this he made conditional, she was either to name the child Nancy, after his mother, or forfeit the whole sum.

In his younger days, he probably had some natural feelings of affection for his fellow humans; but as the years went by and his greedy desire for wealth grew, he showed a strong dislike for his brother, who competed with him in both poverty and riches, yet still grazed sheep on the same common land. To his niece, though, he once gave a guinea when she had a daughter, but he attached a condition: she had to name the baby Nancy, after his mother, or she would lose the entire amount.

Still, with that strange contrariety which even the most penurious occasionally present, gleams of kindness broke forth at intervals, as sunbeams on a stony waste. He was known secretly to have assisted persons whose modes of life and appearance were infinitely superior to his own; and though parsimonious in the extreme, he was never guilty of injustice, or accused of attempting to overreach his neighbors. He was also a second Hampden in defending the rights and privileges of those who were connected with his locality. While old Daniel lived, no infringements were permitted on Harrow Weal Common; he heeded neither the rank nor wealth of those who attempted to act unjustly, but, putting himself at the head of the villagers, he resisted such aggressions with uniform success.[Pg 151] On one occasion, also, having been reluctantly obliged to prosecute a horse-stealer at Aylesbury, he set forth with one of his neighbors on an unshod steed, with a mane and tail of no ordinary growth, a halter for a bridle, a sack instead of a saddle. Thus equipped, he went on, till, having reached the principal inn at Aylesbury, the miser addressed his companion, saying,

Still, with that odd contradiction that even the thriftiest people sometimes show, moments of kindness would occasionally shine through, like sunbeams breaking on a rocky landscape. He secretly helped people whose lifestyles and appearances were far more refined than his own; and although he was extremely frugal, he was never unjust, nor was he ever accused of trying to take advantage of his neighbors. He was also like a second Hampden in standing up for the rights and privileges of those in his community. While old Daniel was alive, there were no violations allowed on Harrow Weal Common; he ignored the rank or wealth of those who tried to act wrongfully, and, leading the villagers, he successfully resisted such aggressions every time.[Pg 151] On one occasion, when he was reluctantly forced to prosecute a horse thief in Aylesbury, he set out with one of his neighbors on an unshod horse with an extraordinary mane and tail, using a halter as a bridle and a sack instead of a saddle. Fully equipped, he continued on until he reached the main inn in Aylesbury, where the miser turned to his companion, saying,

"Pray, sir, go into the house and order what you please, and live like a gentleman, I will settle for it readily; but as regards myself, I must go on in my old way."

"Please, sir, go into the house and do what you want, and live like a gentleman; I’ll take care of it easily. But as for me, I have to stick to my usual way."

His friend entreated him to take a comfortable repast, but this he steadily refused. A penny-worth of bread sufficed for his meal, and at night he slept under his horse's manger; but when the business that brought him to Aylesbury was ended, he paid fifteen shillings, the amount of his companion's bill, with the utmost cheerfulness.

His friend urged him to have a nice meal, but he consistently declined. A little bit of bread was enough for him, and at night he slept under his horse's feeding trough; however, when the matter that brought him to Aylesbury was finished, he happily paid the fifteen shillings that covered his companion's bill.

Grateful too, he was, as years went on, to Lady Tempest for her unwearied kindness, and he resolved to leave her the wealth which he had accumulated. His sister, too, expressed the same wish; and when, after six months of continued attention from that lady, Miss Dancer found her end approach, she instructed her brother to give their benefactress an acknowledgment from the one thousand six hundred pounds which she had concealed in an old tattered petticoat.

Grateful he was, as the years went by, to Lady Tempest for her endless kindness, and he decided to leave her the wealth he had accumulated. His sister also expressed the same wish; and when, after six months of constant care from that lady, Miss Dancer felt her end approaching, she told her brother to give their benefactress a token of appreciation from the one thousand six hundred pounds she had hidden in an old, tattered petticoat.

"Not a penny of that money," said old Dancer, unceremoniously to his sister. "Not a penny as yet. The good lady shall have the whole when I am gone."

"Not a dime of that money," said old Dancer to his sister without any formality. "Not a dime yet. The kind lady will get everything when I'm gone."

At length the time came when the old man must be gone; when his desolate abode and neglected fields should bear witness no longer against him. Few particulars are known concerning his death. The fact alone is certain, that the evening before his departure, he dispatched a messenger to Lady Tempest requesting to see her ladyship, and that, being gratified by her arrival, he expressed great satisfaction. Finding himself somewhat better, his attachment to the hoarded pelf, which he valued even more than the only friend he had on earth, overcame the resolution he had formed of giving her his will; and though his hand was scarcely able to perform its functions, he took hold of the precious document and replaced it in his bosom.

At last, the time came for the old man to leave; when his lonely home and neglected fields would no longer stand as a reminder against him. Few details are known about his death. The one certain fact is that the evening before he passed away, he sent a messenger to Lady Tempest asking to see her. When she arrived, he was very pleased. Feeling a bit better, his attachment to the wealth he had hoarded, which he valued even more than his only friend in the world, made him abandon his plan to give her his will. Even though his hand could barely function, he grasped the important document and put it back in his pocket.

The next morning he became worse, and again did the same kind lady attend the old man's summons; when, having confided to her keeping the title-deeds of wealth which he valued more than life, his hand suddenly became convulsed, his head sunk upon the pillow, and the miser breathed his last.

The next morning he got worse, and once again the same kind lady responded to the old man's call; after he entrusted her with the title-deeds to the wealth he valued more than life, his hand suddenly convulsed, his head dropped onto the pillow, and the miser took his last breath.

The house in which he died, and where he first drew breath, exhibited a picture of utter desolation. Those who crossed the threshold stood silent, as if awe-struck. Yet that miserable haunt contained the hoarded wealth of years. Gold and silver coins were dug up on[Pg 152] the ground-floor; plate and table-linen, with clothes of every description, were found locked up in chests; large bowls, filled with guineas and half-guineas came to light, with parcels of bank-notes stuffed under the covers of old chairs. Some hundred-weights of waste-paper, the accumulation of half a century, were also discovered; and two or three tons of old iron, consisting of nails and horse-shoes, which the miser had picked up.

The house where he died, and where he was born, looked completely abandoned. Those who stepped inside stood quietly, almost in awe. Yet that bleak place held the hidden treasures of many years. Gold and silver coins were dug up on[Pg 152] the ground floor; silverware and table linens, along with clothes of all kinds, were found stored in chests; large bowls, filled with guineas and half-guineas, surfaced, along with bundles of banknotes stuffed under the cushions of old chairs. Several hundred pounds of scrap paper, collected over half a century, were also uncovered; and two to three tons of old iron, made up of nails and horseshoes, that the miser had picked up.

Strange communings had passed within the walls—sordid, yet bitter thoughts, the crushing of all kindly yearnings toward a better state of mind. The outer conduct of the man was known, but the internal conflict between good and evil remains untold.

Strange conversations had taken place within the walls—gloomy, yet painful thoughts, the stifling of all warm feelings toward a better mindset. The man's outward behavior was clear, but the inner struggle between good and evil remains untold.

Nearly sixty-four years have elapsed since the miser and his sister passed from among the living. Perchance some lichen-dotted stone, if carefully sought for and narrowly examined, may give the exact period of their death, but, as yet, no record of the kind has been discovered. Collateral testimonies, however, go far to prove that the death of the miser took place about the year 1775, and that his sister died a few months previous.

Nearly sixty-four years have gone by since the miser and his sister passed away. Maybe a lichen-covered stone, if you look closely, could reveal the exact date of their deaths, but so far, no such record has been found. However, related evidence strongly suggests that the miser died around 1775, with his sister passing away a few months earlier.


RESULTS OF AN ACCIDENT.—THE GUM SECRET.

In journeying from Dublin westward, by the banks of the Liffey, we pass the village of Chapelizod, and hamlet of Palmerstown. The water-power of the Liffey has attracted manufacturers at different times, who with less or greater success, but, unfortunately, with a general ill-success, have established works there. Paper-making, starch-making, cotton-spinning and weaving, bleaching and printing of calicoes, have been attempted. But all have been in turn abandoned, though occasionally renewed by some new firm or private adventurer. Into the supposed causes of failure it is not here necessary to inquire. The manufacture of starch has survived several disasters.

As we travel west from Dublin along the banks of the Liffey, we pass through the village of Chapelizod and the small community of Palmerstown. The water power of the Liffey has attracted manufacturers at various times, who, with varying degrees of success—though mostly unsuccessful—have set up operations there. Attempts have been made in paper-making, starch-making, cotton spinning and weaving, and bleaching and printing of calicoes. However, all of these have ultimately been abandoned, although some new company or individual has occasionally tried reviving them. It isn't necessary to explore the reasons for these failures here. The starch manufacturing has endured several setbacks.

The article British gum, which is now so extensively used by calico-printers, by makers-up of stationery, by the Government in postage-stamp making, and in various industrial arts, was first made at Chapelizod. Its origin and history are somewhat curious.

The article British gum, which is now widely used by calico printers, by manufacturers of stationery, by the government in postage stamp production, and in various industrial arts, was first produced in Chapelizod. Its origin and history are quite interesting.

The use of potatoes in the starch factories excited the vehement opposition of the people, whose chief article of food was thus consumed and enhanced in price. These factories were several times assailed by angry multitudes, and on more than one occasion set on fire by means never discovered. The fires were not believed to have been always accidental.

The use of potatoes in the starch factories sparked strong opposition from the people, as their main food source was being used up and driving up prices. These factories were attacked multiple times by angry crowds, and more than once, they were set ablaze by unknown means. The fires were not always thought to be accidental.

On the fifth of September, 1821, George the Fourth, on his return to England from visiting Ireland, embarked at Dunleary harbor, near Dublin. On that occasion the ancient Irish name of Dunleary was blotted out, and in honor of the royal visit that of Kingston was substituted. In the evening the citizens of Dublin sat late in taverns and at supper parties. Loyalty and punch[Pg 153] abounded. In the midst of their revelry a cry of "fire" was heard. They ran to the streets, and some, following the glare and the cries, found the fire at a starch manufactory near Chapelizod. The stores not being of a nature to burn rapidly, were in great part saved from the fire, but they were so freely deluged with water, that the starch was washed away in streams ankle-deep over the roadways and lanes into the Liffey.

On September 5, 1821, George IV, on his way back to England after visiting Ireland, boarded a ship at Dunleary harbor, near Dublin. On this occasion, the old Irish name Dunleary was replaced with Kingston in honor of the royal visit. That evening, the people of Dublin stayed late in pubs and dinner parties. Loyalty and punch were abundant. In the middle of their celebration, a shout of "fire" was heard. They rushed to the streets, and some, following the light and the shouts, discovered the fire at a starch factory near Chapelizod. Since the supplies were not very flammable, they were mostly saved from the flames, but they were so thoroughly soaked with water that the starch was washed away in streams, ankle-deep, flowing into the Liffey.

Next morning one of the journeymen block-printers—whose employment was at the Palmerstown print-works, but who lodged at Chapelizod—woke with a parched throat and headache. He asked himself where he had been. He had been seeing the King away; drinking, with thousands more, Dunleary out of, and Kingston into, the map of Ireland. Presently, his confused memory brought him a vision of a fire: he had a thirsty sense of having been carrying buckets of water; of hearing the hissing of water on hot iron floors; of the clanking of engines, and shouts of people working the pumps, and of himself tumbling about with the rest of the mob, and rolling over one another in streams of liquefied wreck, running from the burning starch stores.

The next morning, one of the journeymen block printers—who worked at the Palmerstown print shop but stayed in Chapelizod—woke up with a dry throat and a headache. He wondered where he had been. He had been seeing the King off; drinking, alongside thousands of others, as Dunleary faded from the map of Ireland and Kingston took its place. Gradually, his foggy memory brought back an image of a fire: he felt a thirsty urge as if he had been carrying buckets of water; he remembered the sound of water hissing on hot iron floors, the clanking of machines, and the shouts of people working the pumps, and he recalled tumbling around with the crowd, rolling over each other in streams of melted wreckage, fleeing from the burning starch stores.

He would rise, dress, go out, inquire about the fire, find his shopmates, and see if it was to be a working day, or once again a drinking day. He tried to dress; but—a—hoo!—his clothes were gummed together. His coat had no entrance for his arms until the sleeves were picked open, bit by bit; what money he had left was glued into his pockets; his waistcoat was tightly buttoned up with—what? Had he been bathing with his clothes on, in a sea of gum-arabic—that costly article used in the print-works?

He would get up, get dressed, go outside, check on the fire, find his coworkers, and see if it was going to be a workday or another day of drinking. He tried to get dressed, but—ugh!—his clothes were stuck together. He couldn't get his arms into his coat until the sleeves were pried open, piece by piece; whatever money he had left was stuck in his pockets; his waistcoat was tightly buttoned up with—what? Had he been swimming in his clothes in a sea of gum-arabic—that expensive stuff used in printing?

This man was not the only one whose clothes were saturated with gum. He and four of his shopmates held a consultation, and visited the wreck of the starch factory. In the roadway, the starch, which, in a hot, calcined state, had been watered by the fire-engines the night before, was now found by them lying in soft, gummy lumps. They took some of it home; they tested it in their trade; they bought starch at a chandler's shop, put it in a frying-pan, burned it to a lighter or darker brown, added water, and at last discovered themselves masters of an article, which, if not gum itself, seemed as suitable for their trade as gum-arabic, and at a fraction of the cost.

This man wasn't the only one whose clothes were covered in gum. He and four of his coworkers had a meeting and checked out the wreck of the starch factory. On the road, they found the starch, which had been soaked by the fire hoses the night before while in a hot, melted state, now lying in soft, sticky clumps. They took some of it home; they experimented with it in their work; they bought starch at a convenience store, put it in a frying pan, burned it to a lighter or darker brown, added water, and eventually realized they had mastered a product that, if not exactly gum, was just as useful for their trade as gum arabic, and at a fraction of the price.

It was their own secret; and, could they have conducted their future proceedings as discreetly as they made their experiments, they might have realized fortunes, and had the merit of practically introducing an article of great utility—one which has assisted in the fortune-making of some of the wealthiest firms in Lancaster (so long as they held it as a secret), and which now the Government of the British empire manufacture for themselves.

It was their own secret; and if they had been able to handle their future actions as carefully as they conducted their experiments, they could have made fortunes and earned the credit for practically introducing a highly useful product—one that has helped some of the richest companies in Lancaster make money (as long as they kept it a secret), and which the British government now manufactures for themselves.

Its subsequent history is not less curious than that just related. Unfortunately for the operative block-printers, who discovered it, their share in its history is soon told.

Its later history is just as intriguing as the one just mentioned. Unfortunately for the working block-printers who found it, their involvement in its story is brief.

It is said that six of them subscribed money to send one of their number to Manchester with samples of the new gum for sale; the reply which he received from drysalters and the managers of print-works, was either that they would have nothing to do with his samples, or an admonition to go home for the present, and return when he was sober. His fellow-workmen, hearing of his non-success and fearing the escape of the secret, sent another of their number to his aid with more money. The two had no better success than the one. The remaining four, after a time, left their work at Dublin, and joined the two in Manchester. They now tried to sell their secret. Before this was effected one died; two were imprisoned for a share in some drunken riots; and all were in extreme poverty. What the price paid for the secret was, is not likely to be revealed now. Part of it was spent in a passage to New Orleans, where it is supposed the discoverers of British gum did not long survive their arrival.

It’s said that six of them contributed money to send one of their group to Manchester with samples of the new gum for sale. The responses he got from drysalters and print-works managers were either that they wanted nothing to do with his samples or a warning to go home for now and come back when he was sober. His coworkers, hearing about his lack of success and worried about the secret getting out, sent another member to help him with more money. The two of them had no better luck than the first. Eventually, the remaining four left their jobs in Dublin and joined the two in Manchester. They tried to sell their secret. Before they could succeed, one of them died; two were imprisoned for involvement in some drunken riots; and all were living in extreme poverty. It’s unlikely the price paid for the secret will ever be revealed. Part of it was used for a ticket to New Orleans, where it’s believed the discoverers of British gum didn’t survive long after arriving.

The secret was not at first worked with success. It passed from its original Lancashire possessor to a gentleman who succeeded in making the article of a sufficiently good quality; and at so low a price that it found a ready introduction in the print-works. But he could not produce it in large quantity without employing assistants, whom he feared to trust with a knowledge of a manufacture so simple and so profitable. In employing men to assist in some parts of the work, and shutting them out from others, their curiosity, or jealousy, could not be restrained. On one or two occasions they caused the officers of Excise to break in upon him when he was burning his starch, under the allegation that he was engaged in illicit practices. His manufactory was broken into in the night by burglars, who only wanted to rob him of his secret. Once the place was maliciously burned down. Other difficulties, far too numerous for present detail, were encountered. Still, he produced the British gum in sufficient quantities for it to yield him a liberal income. At last, in a week of sickness, he was pressed by the head of a well-known firm of calico-printers for a supply. He got out of bed; went to his laboratory; had the fire kindled; put on his vessel of plate-iron; calcined his starch, added the water, observed the temperature; and all the while held conversation with his keen-eyed customer, whom he had unsuspectingly allowed to be present. It is enough to say that this acute calico-printer never required any more British gum of the convalescent's making. Gradually the secret spread, although the original purchaser of it still retained a share of the manufacture.

The secret wasn’t initially kept successfully. It passed from its original owner in Lancashire to a gentleman who managed to create a product of good quality at a low price, which helped it gain traction in the print industry. However, he couldn’t make it in large quantities without hiring assistants, whom he was hesitant to trust with such a simple yet profitable process. By hiring men to help with certain parts of the work while keeping them in the dark about others, he couldn’t control their curiosity or jealousy. On a couple of occasions, they led Excise officers to raid his place when he was burning his starch, claiming he was up to something illegal. His factory was broken into at night by thieves who were only after his secret. Once, it was even maliciously burned down. He faced numerous other challenges that are too many to outline here. Still, he managed to produce British gum in enough quantities to earn a good income. Eventually, during a week of illness, he was pressed by the head of a well-known calico-printing firm for a supply. He got out of bed, went to his lab, started the fire, set up his iron vessel, calcined his starch, added water, monitored the temperature, and conversed with his sharp-eyed customer, who he had unknowingly allowed to observe. It’s enough to say that this savvy calico-printer never needed any more British gum from the recovering man. Gradually, the secret spread, although the original buyer still kept a share of the production.

When penny postage came into operation, it was at first doubtful whether adhesive labels could be made sufficiently good and low-priced, which would not have been the case with gum-arabic. British gum solved the difficulty; and the manufacturer made a contract to supply it for the labels. In the second year of his contract, a rumor was spread, that the adhesive[Pg 155] matter on the postage stamps was a deleterious substance, made of the refuse of fish, and other disgusting materials. The great British gum secret was then spread far and wide. The public was extensively informed that the postage-label poison was made simply of—potatoes.

When penny postage was introduced, there were initial doubts about whether adhesive labels could be produced that were both high quality and affordable, which wouldn’t have been possible with gum-arabic. British gum solved that issue, and the manufacturer signed a contract to supply it for the labels. In the second year of his contract, rumors began circulating that the adhesive[Pg 155] on the postage stamps was a harmful substance made from fish waste and other unpleasant materials. The secret of British gum then spread widely. The public was informed that the supposed poison in the postage labels was actually made from—potatoes.


MY LITTLE FRENCH FRIEND.

Mademoiselle Honorine is a teacher of her own language in a cathedral town south of the Loire, celebrated for the finest church and the longest street in France; at least, so say the inhabitants, who have seen no others. The purest French is supposed to be spoken hereabouts, and the reputation thus given has for many years attracted hosts of foreigners anxious to attain the true accent formerly in vogue at the court of the refined Catherine de Medici. It is true that this extreme grace of diction and tone is not acknowledged by Parisians; who, when they had a court, imagined the best French was spoken in the capital where that court resided; and they have been long in the habit of sneering at the pretensions of their rivals; who, however, among foreigners, still keep their middle-age fame.

Mademoiselle Honorine is a teacher of her native language in a cathedral town south of the Loire, famous for having the finest church and the longest street in France; at least, that’s what the locals say, as they haven’t seen any others. It’s believed that the purest French is spoken around here, and this reputation has attracted many foreigners over the years who want to learn the authentic accent that was once popular in the court of the sophisticated Catherine de Medici. It’s true that Parisians don’t recognize this extreme elegance in speech and tone; when they had a court, they thought the best French was spoken in the capital where that court was located, and they’ve long been mocking their rivals' claims. However, those rivals still maintain their medieval reputation among foreigners.

Mademoiselle Honorine is not a native of this remarkable town; and the French she teaches is of a different sort, for she comes from a far-off province, by no means so remarkable for purity of accent. She is an Alsatian, and her natal town is no other than Vancouleurs, where the tree under which Joan of Arc saw angels and became inspired, once existed.

Mademoiselle Honorine isn't originally from this remarkable town, and the French she teaches is different because she comes from a distant province that's not known for its pure accent. She's from Alsace, and her birthplace is Vancouleurs, where the tree that Joan of Arc sat under to see angels and get inspired once stood.

As may be imagined, Mademoiselle Honorine is proud of this accident of birth, and tells with much exultation of having, at the age of fifteen, some thirty-five years ago, borne the part of La Pucelle in the grand procession to Domremy, formerly an annual festival. She relates that she attracted universal attention on that occasion, chiefly from the circumstance of her hair, which is now of silvery whiteness, having been equally so then, much to the admiration of all who beheld her.

As you can imagine, Mademoiselle Honorine is proud of this twist of fate and excitedly shares how, at the age of fifteen, about thirty-five years ago, she played the role of La Pucelle in the grand procession to Domremy, which used to be an annual festival. She recounts how she drew everyone's attention that day, mainly because her hair, which is now a silvery white, looked just as vibrant back then, much to the admiration of everyone who saw her.

"I was always," she remarks, with satisfied vanity, "celebrated for my hair, and I had at all times a high color and bright eyes; so that, though some people preferred the beauty of my sisters, I always got more partners than they at all our fêtes. It is true they all married, and no one proposed to me, except old Monsieur de Monzon, who suffered from the gout and a very bad temper; but I had no respect for his character and though he was rich, and I might have been a châtelaine, instead of such a poor woman as I am, still I refused him, for I preferred my liberty; and that, also, was the reason I left my uncle's domain, because I like independence. We used, my aunt, my uncle, and I, to spend most of our time at his country place, going out every day lark-catching, which we did with looking-glasses: they held the glasses and lured the birds, while I was ready with the net to throw over them. My uncle, however, was always scolding me for talking and frightening the birds[Pg 156] away; so I got tired of this amusement and of the dependence in which I lived."

"I was always," she says with a satisfied pride, "known for my hair, and I always had a rosy complexion and bright eyes; so, even though some people preferred the beauty of my sisters, I always ended up with more partners than they did at all our fêtes. It's true they all got married, and no one ever proposed to me, except for old Monsieur de Monzon, who had gout and a really bad temper; but I had no respect for his character, and even though he was rich, and I could have been a châtelaine instead of the poor woman I am, I still turned him down because I valued my freedom. That’s also why I left my uncle’s estate; I enjoy independence. My aunt, my uncle, and I used to spend most of our time at his country house, going out every day to catch larks, which we did with mirrors: they held the mirrors to lure the birds, while I was ready with the net to throw over them. However, my uncle was always scolding me for talking and scaring the birds away; so I got tired of this pastime and the dependence I was living in."

The independence preferred by Mademoiselle Honorine to lark-catching and snubbing, consists in giving lessons to the English. As, of late, we islanders have been as hard to catch as the victims of the looking-glasses, her occupation is not lucrative; and although she sometimes devotes her energies to the arts, in the form of twisted colored paper tortured into the semblance of weeping willows, and nondescript flowers, yet these specimens of ingenuity do not bring in a very large revenue. In fact, her income, when I knew her, could not be considered enormous; for, to pay house-rent, board, washing, and sundry little expenses, she possessed twelve francs a month: yet with these resources, nevertheless, she contrived to do more benevolent and charitable acts than any person I ever met with. She has always halfpence for the poor's bag at church—always farthings for certain regular pensioners, who expect her donation as she passes them, at their begging stations, on her way to her pupils. Moreover, on New-year's day, she has always the means of making the prettiest presents to a friend who for years has shown her countenance, and put little gains in her way.

The independence that Mademoiselle Honorine prefers over lark-catching and snubbing involves giving lessons to the English. Recently, we islanders have been as hard to catch as the victims of looking-glasses, so her work isn’t very profitable. Although she sometimes channels her energy into art, creating twisted colored paper shaped into weeping willows and random flowers, these creative pieces don’t earn her much money. In fact, when I knew her, her income couldn’t be considered large; to cover rent, food, laundry, and other small expenses, she had just twelve francs a month. Yet with these limited resources, she managed to do more benevolent and charitable acts than anyone I’ve ever met. She always has coins for the poor's bag at church—always has small change for certain regular pensioners who expect her donations as she walks by them at their begging spots on her way to meet her students. Furthermore, on New Year’s Day, she always has enough to give the nicest gifts to a friend who has supported her for years and helped her make some small profits.

She obtains six francs per month from a couple of pupils, whose merit is as great in receiving, as hers in giving lessons. These are two young workwomen who desire to improve their education, and daily devote to study the only unoccupied hour they possess. From six o'clock till seven, Mademoiselle Honorine, therefore, on her return from the five o'clock mass—which she never misses—calls at the garret of these devotees, and imparts her instruction in reading and writing to the zealous aspirants for knowledge.

She earns six francs a month from a couple of students, who are just as dedicated to learning as she is to teaching. These are two young women who want to better their education and spend their only free hour each day studying. So, from six to seven, Mademoiselle Honorine, after attending the five o'clock mass—which she never misses—stops by the attic of these eager learners and teaches them reading and writing.

"I would not," she says, "miss their lessons for the world; because, you see, I have thus always an eye upon their conduct, and have an opportunity of throwing in a little good advice, and making them read good books."

"I wouldn’t," she says, "miss their lessons for anything; because, you see, I always keep an eye on their behavior, and I get a chance to offer some good advice and encourage them to read quality books."

As these young damsels go out to their work directly after the lesson is over—taking breakfast at a late hour in the day—Mademoiselle Honorine provides herself, before starting to the five o'clock mass, with a bit of dry bread, which she puts in her pocket, ready to eat when the moment of hunger arrives. She never allows herself any other breakfast; and, as she drinks only cold water, no expenditure of fuel is necessary for this in her establishment. Except it occurs to any of her pupils—few of whom are much richer than her earliest-served—to offer her some refreshment to lighten her labors, Mademoiselle Honorine contrives to walk, and talk, and laugh, and be amusing on an empty stomach, till dinner-time, when she is careful to provide herself with an apple and another slice of bread, which she enjoys in haste, and betakes herself to other occupations, chiefly unremunerative—such as visiting a sick neighbor, reading to a blind friend, or taking a walk on the fashionable[Pg 157] promenade with an infirm invalid, who requires the support of an arm.

As these young ladies head out to work right after their lessons—having breakfast late in the day—Mademoiselle Honorine grabs a piece of dry bread before heading to the five o'clock mass, which she keeps in her pocket to eat when she gets hungry. She never allows herself any other breakfast, and since she only drinks cold water, she doesn't have to spend money on fuel for cooking. Unless one of her students—most of whom aren’t much wealthier than she is—offers her something to make her day easier, Mademoiselle Honorine manages to walk, talk, laugh, and keep things fun on an empty stomach until dinner time. When that comes, she makes sure to have an apple and another slice of bread, which she quickly enjoys before moving on to other tasks, mostly unpaid ones—like visiting a sick neighbor, reading to a blind friend, or taking a stroll on the trendy[Pg 157] promenade with an ill person who needs some support.

Fire in France is an expensive luxury which she economizes—not that she indulges, when forced to allow herself in comfort, in much besides turf or pine-cones, with perhaps a sprinkling of fagot-wood if a friend calls in. She is able, however, to keep a little canary in a cage, who is her valued companion; and she nourishes, besides, several little productive plants in pots, such as violets and résida; chiefly, it must be owned, with a view of having the means of making floral offerings, on birthdays and christenings, to her very numerous acquaintances.

Fire in France is an expensive luxury that she manages to budget for—not that she treats herself to much comfort, aside from maybe some peat or pine cones, and perhaps a few twigs if a friend drops by. However, she's able to keep a little canary in a cage, who is her cherished companion; and she also cares for several small potted plants like violets and résida, mainly so she has something to offer as gifts of flowers for birthdays and christenings to her many friends.

She is never seen out of spirits, and is welcomed as an object of interest whenever she flits along with her round, rosy, smiling face, shrined in braids of white hair, and set off with a smart fashionable-shaped bonnet; for she likes being in the fashion, and is proud of the slightness of her waist, which her polka shows to advantage. The strings of her bonnet, and the ribbons and buttons of her dress, are sometimes very fresh, and her mittens are sometimes very uncommon: this she is particular about, as she shows her hands a good deal in accompanying herself on the guitar, which she does with much taste, for her ear is very good and her voice has been musical. There are few things Mademoiselle Honorine can not do to be useful. She can play at draughts and dominos, can knit or net, knowing all the last new patterns; her satin stitch is neatness itself. It is suspected that she turns some of these talents to advantage; but that is a secret, as she considers it more dignified to be known only as a teacher.

She’s always in good spirits and is seen as an interesting person whenever she glides by with her round, rosy, smiling face, framed by braids of white hair, and topped off with a stylish, fashionable bonnet. She enjoys keeping up with the trends and takes pride in her slim waist, which her polka dress highlights nicely. The strings of her bonnet, along with the ribbons and buttons on her dress, are often very fresh, and her mittens can be quite unique; she cares about this since she shows her hands a lot while playing the guitar, which she does with great skill, as she has a good ear and a melodic voice. There are few things Mademoiselle Honorine can’t do to be helpful. She can play checkers and dominoes, knit or crochet, and knows all the latest patterns; her satin stitch is perfectly neat. People suspect that she uses some of these talents to her advantage, but that remains a secret, as she prefers to be known simply as a teacher.

She had a curious set of pupils when I became acquainted with her. Those whom I knew were English; who were, rather late in their career, endeavoring to become proficients in a tongue positively necessary for economical, useful, or sentimental purposes, as the case might be, but which in more early days they had not calculated on requiring.

She had a strange group of students when I first met her. The ones I knew were English and, somewhat later in life, were trying to become skilled in a language that was definitely needed for practical, useful, or emotional reasons, depending on the situation, but which they hadn’t anticipated needing earlier on.

They were of those who encourage late ambition—

They were the kind of people who inspire late-blooming ambition—

"And from the leftovers of life expect to receive
"What the first lively run couldn't provide."

The first of these was a bachelor of some fifty-five, formerly a medical practitioner, now retired, and living in a lively lodging, in a premier that overlooked the Loire; which reflected back so much sun from its broad surface on a bright winter's day, that the circumstance greatly diminished his expenses in the dreaded article of fuel—a consideration with both natives and foreigners. Economy was strictly practiced by Dr. Drowler. Nevertheless, as he was very gallant, and loved to pay compliments to his fair young French friends, whom he did not suspect of laughing at him, he became desirous of acquiring greater facility in the lighter part of a language which served him indifferently well in the ordinary concerns of his bachelor house-keeping. He therefore resolved to take advantage of the low terms and obliging disposition of Mademoiselle[Pg 158] Honorine, and placed himself on her form. There was much good-will on both sides, and his instructress declared that she should have felt little fear of his ultimate success, but for his defective hearing; which considerably interfered with his appreciation of those shades of pronunciation which might be necessary to render him capable of charming the attentive ears of the young ladies, who were on the tiptoe of expectation to hear what progress he had made in the language of Jean Jacques Rousseau.

The first of these was a bachelor around fifty-five, who used to be a doctor but was now retired and living in a lively apartment that overlooked the Loire. On a bright winter's day, the river reflected so much sunlight that it significantly lowered his heating costs—a big deal for both locals and foreigners. Dr. Drowler practiced strict economy. Still, because he was quite charming and loved to compliment his young French friends, who he didn't think were laughing at him, he wanted to get better at the lighter side of a language he managed well enough for his everyday bachelor life. So, he decided to take advantage of the affordable rates and friendly nature of Mademoiselle[Pg 158] Honorine and signed up for lessons with her. There was a lot of goodwill on both sides, and his teacher said she would have felt confident in his success if it weren't for his hearing issues, which made it hard for him to catch the nuances of pronunciation that could help him impress the young ladies eagerly waiting to hear how he was progressing with the language of Jean Jacques Rousseau.

Another of Mademoiselle Honorine's charges was Mrs. Mumble, a widow of uncertain age, whose early education had been a good deal left to nature; and who—her income being small—had sought the banks of the poetical Loire (in, she told her Somersetshire friends, the south of France) to make, as she expressed it, "both ends meet." "One lesson a week at a franc," she reflected, "won't ruin me, and I shall soon get to speak their language as well as the best of 'em." Mademoiselle Honorine herself would not have despaired of her pupil arriving at something approaching to this result, could she have got the better of a certain indistinctness of utterance caused by the loss of several teeth.

Another one of Mademoiselle Honorine's students was Mrs. Mumble, a widow of uncertain age, whose early education had mostly been left to chance; and who—since her income was small—had gone to the banks of the poetic Loire (as she told her friends from Somersetshire, in the south of France) to try to make ends meet. "One lesson a week for a franc," she thought, "won't break the bank, and I’ll soon be speaking their language as well as anyone." Mademoiselle Honorine herself would not have given up on her student reaching this goal, if only she could overcome a certain slurring in her speech caused by the loss of several teeth.

Miss Dogherty was a third pupil; a young lady of fifty, with very youthful manners, and a slight figure. She had labored long to acquire the true "Porris twang," as she termed it; but, finding her efforts unavailing, she had resolved during her winter in Touraine, to devote herself to the language, drawing it pure from the source; and agreed to sacrifice ten francs per month, in order, by daily hours of devotion, to reach the goal. An inveterate Tipperary accent interfered slightly with her views, but she hit on an ingenious expedient for concealing the defect; this was, never to open her mouth to more than half its size in speaking; and always to utter her English in a broken manner, which might convey to the stranger the idea of her being a foreigner. She had her cards printed as Mademoiselle Durté, which made the illusion complete.

Miss Dogherty was a third student; a lady of fifty with very youthful manners and a slight figure. She had worked hard to acquire the true "Porris twang," as she called it; but, finding her attempts unsuccessful, she decided during her winter in Touraine to fully immerse herself in the language, learning it straight from the source. She agreed to pay ten francs a month to dedicate daily hours to reach her goal. A stubborn Tipperary accent slightly interfered with her plans, but she came up with a clever way to hide the flaw; she would never open her mouth more than halfway when speaking and always spoke English in a broken manner, which might make strangers think she was a foreigner. She had her cards printed as Mademoiselle Durté, which completed the illusion.

But these pupils were not to be entirely relied on for producing an income—Mademoiselle Honorine could scarcely reckon on the advantages they presented for a continuance, sanguine as she was. In fact, she may be said to have, as a certainty, only one permanent pupil, whom she looks upon as her chief stay, and her gratitude for this source of emolument is such, that she is always ready to evince her sense of its importance by adopting the character of nursemaid, classical teacher—although her knowledge of the dead languages is not extensive—or general governess, approaching the maternal character the nearer from the compassion she feels for the pretty little orphan English boy, who lives under the care of an infirm old grandmother. With this little gentleman, whose domicile is situated about two miles from her own, at the top of a steep hill, she walks, and talks, and laughs, and teaches, and enjoys herself so much, that she considers it but right to reward him for the pleasure[Pg 159] he gives her by expending a few sous every day in sweetmeats for his delectation; this sum making a considerable gap in the monthly salary his grandmother is able to afford. However, her disinterestedness is not thrown away here, and I learn with singular satisfaction that Mademoiselle Honorine having been detected in the act of devouring her dry crust, by way of breakfast, and her pupil having won from her the confession that she never had any other, a cup of hot chocolate was always afterward prepared and offered to her by the little student as soon as she entered his study. When I had an opportunity of judging—a fact which more than once occurred to me—of the capabilities of Mademoiselle Honorine's appetite, I was gratified, though surprised, to find that nothing came amiss to her; that she could enjoy any thing in the shape of fish, flesh, or fowl, and drank a good glass of Bordeaux, or even Champagne, with singular glee.

But these students couldn't be fully relied on to provide an income—Mademoiselle Honorine could hardly count on the benefits they offered for long-term stability, optimistic as she was. In reality, she only had one permanent student, who she considered her main support, and her gratitude for this source of income was so great that she was always eager to show how much it meant to her by taking on the roles of nursemaid, classical teacher—despite her limited knowledge of the dead languages—or general governess, getting closer to a maternal role due to the compassion she felt for the cute little orphan English boy who lived with his frail old grandmother. With this little guy, whose home was about two miles from hers at the top of a steep hill, she walked, talked, laughed, taught, and had so much fun that she felt it was only right to reward him for the joy he brought her by spending a few coins every day on sweets for him; this amount made a noticeable dent in the monthly salary his grandmother could provide. However, her selflessness didn't go unnoticed, and I was pleased to hear that Mademoiselle Honorine was caught eating her dry crust for breakfast, and after her student got her to admit that she never had anything else, he always prepared a cup of hot chocolate to offer her as soon as she entered his study. Whenever I had the chance to observe Mademoiselle Honorine's eating habits, which happened more than once, I was pleased, though surprised, to find that she was able to enjoy anything, whether it was fish, meat, or poultry, and she happily drank a good glass of Bordeaux or even Champagne.

It happened, not long since, that the friend who had revealed to me the secret of her manner of life, was suddenly called upon to pay a sum of money on some railway shares she possessed; and, being unprepared, was lamenting in the presence of Mademoiselle Honorine, the inconvenience she was put to.

It happened not too long ago that the friend who disclosed to me how she lived was suddenly asked to pay for some railway shares she owned; and, caught off guard, she was expressing her frustration in front of Mademoiselle Honorine about the trouble it caused her.

The next day, the lively little dame appeared with a canvas bag in her hand, containing no less a sum than five hundred francs. "Here," she said, smiling, "is the exact sum you want. It is most lucky I should happen to have as much. I have been collecting it for years; for, you know, in case of sickness, one likes to avoid being a burden to one's friends. It is at your service for as long a time as you like, and you will relieve me from anxiety in taking it into your hands." It was impossible to refuse the offer; and the good little woman was thus enabled to repay the many kindnesses she had received, and to add greatly to her own dignity; of which she is very tenacious.

The next day, the cheerful little woman showed up with a canvas bag in her hand, containing no less than five hundred francs. "Here," she said, smiling, "is the exact amount you need. It's so lucky that I happened to have this much. I've been saving it for years because, you know, in case of illness, you don't want to be a burden to your friends. It's at your disposal for as long as you need, and you'll ease my mind by taking it." It was impossible to turn down the offer, and the kind little woman was able to repay the many favors she had received and to enhance her own dignity, which she values greatly.

"Ah!" said a Parisian lady to her one day, after hearing of her thousand occupations and privations, "how do you contrive to live; and what can you care about life? I should have had recourse to charcoal long ago, if I had been in your situation. Yet you are always laughing and gay, as if you dined on foie-gras and truffles every day of your existence!"

"Ah!" said a Parisian woman to her one day, after hearing about her countless jobs and struggles, "how do you manage to get by, and what keeps you interested in life? I would have turned to charcoal long ago if I were in your position. Yet you’re always laughing and cheerful, as if you feast on foie-gras and truffles every single day!"

"So I do," replied the little heroine—"at least on what is quite as good—for I have all I want, all I care about, never owing a sous, and being a charge to no one. Besides, I have a secret happiness which nothing can take away; and, when I go into the church of a morning to mass, I thank God with all my heart for all the blessings he gives me, and, above all, for the extreme content which makes all the world seem a paradise of enjoyment. I never know what it is to be dull, and as for charcoal, I have no objection to it in a foot-warmer, but that is all the acquaintance I am likely to make with it."

“So I do,” replied the little heroine, “at least in ways that are just as good—because I have everything I want, everything I care about, never owing a penny and being a burden to no one. Plus, I have a secret happiness that nothing can take away; and when I go to church in the morning for mass, I thank God with all my heart for all the blessings He gives me, and, above all, for the deep contentment that makes the whole world feel like a paradise of enjoyment. I never feel bored, and as for charcoal, I have no problem with it in a foot-warmer, but that’s as close as I’m likely to get to it.”

"Poor soul!" returned the Parisienne, "how I pity you!"

"Poor thing!" replied the Parisian, "I really feel for you!"


BLEAK HOUSE.[D]
BY CHARLES DICKENS.

CHAPTER XI.—Dear Brother.

A touch on the lawyer's wrinkled hand, as he stands in the dark room, irresolute, makes him start and say, "What's that?"

A touch on the lawyer's wrinkled hand, as he stands in the dark room, unsure, makes him jump and say, "What's that?"

"It's me," returns the old man of the house, whose breath is in his ear. "Can't you wake him?"

"It's me," replies the old man of the house, whose breath is in his ear. "Can't you wake him?"

"No."

"Nope."

"What have you done with your candle?"

"What did you do with your candle?"

"It's gone out. Here it is."

"It's here. Check it out."

Krook takes it, goes to the fire, stoops over the red embers, and tries to get a light. The dying ashes have no light to spare, and his endeavors are vain. Muttering, after an ineffectual call to his lodger, that he will go down stairs, and bring a lighted candle from the shop, the old man departs. Mr. Tulkinghorn, for some new reason that he has, does not await his return in the room, but on the stairs outside.

Krook takes it, walks over to the fire, leans down over the red embers, and tries to get a light. The dying ashes have no light to give, and his efforts are useless. Grumbling, after a fruitless shout to his lodger, that he'll go downstairs and grab a lit candle from the shop, the old man leaves. Mr. Tulkinghorn, for some new reason he has, doesn’t wait for him to come back in the room, but stands outside on the stairs.

The welcome light soon shines upon the wall, as Krook comes slowly up, with his green-eyed cat following at his heels. "Does the man generally sleep like this?" inquires the lawyer, in a low voice. "Hi! I don't know," says Krook, shaking his head, and lifting his eyebrows. "I know next to nothing of his habits, except that he keeps himself very close."

The welcome light soon shines upon the wall, as Krook slowly approaches, with his green-eyed cat trailing behind him. "Does he usually sleep like this?" the lawyer asks quietly. "I don't know," responds Krook, shaking his head and raising his eyebrows. "I know almost nothing about his habits, except that he stays very private."

Thus whispering, they both go in together. As the light goes in, the great eyes in the shutters, darkening, seem to close. Not so the eyes upon the bed.

Thus whispering, they both go in together. As the light enters, the large eyes in the shutters, darkening, seem to close. Not so the eyes on the bed.

"God save us!" exclaims Mr. Tulkinghorn. "He is dead!"

"God save us!" Mr. Tulkinghorn exclaims. "He’s dead!"

Krook drops the heavy hand he has taken up, so suddenly that the arm swings over the bedside.

Krook suddenly drops the heavy hand he's been holding, and his arm swings over the bedside.

They look at one another for a moment.

They glance at each other for a moment.

"Send for some doctor! Call for Miss Flite up the stairs, sir. Here's poison by the bed! Call out for Flite, will you?" says Krook, with his lean hands spread out above the body like a vampire's wings.

"Get a doctor! Call for Miss Flite up the stairs, sir. There’s poison by the bed! Shout for Flite, will you?" says Krook, with his thin hands spread out above the body like a vampire's wings.

Mr. Tulkinghorn hurries to the landing, and calls, "Miss Flite! Flite! Make haste, here, whoever you are! Flite!" Krook follows him with his eyes, and, while he is calling, finds opportunity to steal to the old portmanteau, and steal back again.

Mr. Tulkinghorn rushes to the landing and shouts, "Miss Flite! Flite! Hurry up, whoever you are! Flite!" Krook watches him closely and, while he’s calling, takes the chance to sneak over to the old suitcase and then slip back again.

"Run, Flite, run! The nearest doctor! Run!" So Mr. Krook addresses a crazy little woman, who is his female lodger: who appears and vanishes in a breath: who soon returns, accompanied by a testy medical man, brought from his dinner—with a broad snuffy upper lip, and a broad Scotch tongue.

"Run, Flite, run! Get the nearest doctor! Hurry!" That's what Mr. Krook shouts to a frantic little woman, his female tenant, who seems to appear and disappear in an instant. She quickly comes back, bringing with her a grumpy doctor, pulled away from his dinner, with a wide, sniffly upper lip and a thick Scottish accent.

"Ey! Bless the hearts o' ye," says the medical man, looking up at them, after a moment's examination. "He's just as dead as Phairy!"

"Hey! Bless your hearts," says the doctor, looking up at them after a moment's examination. "He's just as dead as a doornail!"

Mr. Tulkinghorn (standing by the old portmanteau) inquires if he has been dead any time.

Mr. Tulkinghorn (standing by the old suitcase) asks if he has been dead for a while.

"Any time, sir?" says the medical gentleman.[Pg 161] "It's probable he wull have been dead aboot three hours."

"Any time, sir?" says the doctor.[Pg 161] "It's likely he will have been dead for about three hours."

"About that time, I should say," observes a dark young man, on the other side of the bed.

"About that time, I should say," comments a dark-haired young man on the other side of the bed.

"Air you in the maydickle prayfession yourself, sir?" inquires the first.

"Are you in the medical profession, sir?" asks the first.

The dark young man says yes.

The dark young man replies, "Yes."

"Then I'll just tak' my depairture," replies the other; "for I'm nae gude here!" With which remark, he finishes his brief attendance, and returns to finish his dinner.

"Then I'll just take my leave," replies the other; "because I'm no good here!" With that comment, he ends his short visit and goes back to finish his dinner.

The dark young surgeon passes the candle across and across the face, and carefully examines the law-writer, who has established his pretensions to his name by becoming indeed No one.

The young surgeon, dressed in dark attire, moves the candle back and forth across the law-writer's face, closely examining him. The law-writer has made a name for himself by essentially being a nobody.

"I knew this person by sight, very well," says he. "He has purchased opium of me, for the last year and a half. Was any body present related to him?" glancing round upon the three bystanders.

"I knew this person by sight, very well," he says. "He has bought opium from me for the last year and a half. Was anyone here related to him?" he asks, looking around at the three bystanders.

"I was his landlord," grimly answers Krook, taking the candle from the surgeon's outstretched hand. "He told me once, I was the nearest relation he had."

"I was his landlord," Krook replies grimly, taking the candle from the surgeon's outstretched hand. "He once told me I was the closest relative he had."

"He has died," says the surgeon, "of an over-dose of opium, there is no doubt. The room is strongly flavored with it. There is enough here now," taking an old teapot from Mr. Krook, "to kill a dozen people."

"He has died," the surgeon says, "from an overdose of opium, no doubt about it. The room is heavily infused with it. There's enough here now," he says, taking an old teapot from Mr. Krook, "to kill a dozen people."

"Do you think he did it on purpose?" asks Krook.

"Do you think he did it on purpose?" Krook asks.

"Took the over-dose?"

"Took the overdose?"

"Yes!" Krook almost smacks his lips with the unction of a horrible interest.

"Yes!" Krook almost smacks his lips with the enjoyment of a terrible fascination.

"I can't say. I should think it unlikely, as he has been in the habit of taking so much. But nobody can tell. He was very poor, I suppose?"

"I can't say. I think it's unlikely since he's used to taking so much. But who knows? He was really poor, I guess?"

"I suppose he was. His room—don't look rich," says Krook; who might have changed eyes with his cat, as he casts his sharp glance around. "But I have never been in it since he had it, and he was too close to name his circumstances to me."

"I guess he was. His room—doesn't look wealthy," says Krook, who might as well have swapped eyes with his cat as he shoots his sharp gaze around. "But I've never been in it since he got it, and he was too tight-lipped to tell me about his situation."

"Did he owe you any rent?"

"Did he owe you any rent?"

"Six weeks."

"6 weeks."

"He will never pay it!" says the young man, resuming his examination. "It is beyond a doubt that he is indeed as dead as Pharaoh; and to judge from his appearance and condition, I should think it a happy release. Yet he must have been a good figure when a youth, and I dare say good-looking." He says this, not unfeelingly, while sitting on the bedstead's edge, with his face toward that other face, and his hand upon the region of the heart. "I recollect once thinking there was something in his manner, uncouth as it was, that denoted a fall in life. Was that so?" he continues, looking round.

"He'll never pay it!" the young man says, going back to his examination. "There's no doubt he’s as dead as Pharaoh; and judging by his look and condition, I’d say it's a happy release. Still, he must have been quite a sight when he was young, and I bet he was good-looking." He says this, not without feeling, while sitting on the edge of the bed, facing that other face, with his hand resting over the area of the heart. "I remember thinking there was something about his manner, awkward as it was, that suggested he had fallen from a better place in life. Was that true?" he continues, looking around.

Krook replies, "You might as well ask me to describe the ladies whose heads of hair I have got in sacks down stairs. Than that he was my lodger for a year and a half, and lived—or didn't live—by law-writing, I know no more of him."

Krook replies, "You might as well ask me to describe the women whose hair I have in sacks downstairs. Other than the fact that he was my tenant for a year and a half, and he made a living—or didn't—by writing legal documents, I don't know anything else about him."

During this dialogue, Mr. Tulkinghorn has[Pg 162] stood aloof by the old portmanteau, with his hands behind him, equally removed, to all appearance, from all three kinds of interest exhibited near the bed—from the young surgeon's professional interest in death, noticeable as being quite apart from his remarks on the deceased as an individual; from the old man's unction; and the little crazy woman's awe. His imperturbable face has been as inexpressive as his rusty clothes. One could not even say he has been thinking all this while. He has shown neither patience nor impatience, nor attention nor abstraction. He has shown nothing but his shell. As easily might the tone of a delicate musical instrument be inferred from its case, as the tone of Mr. Tulkinghorn from his case.

During this conversation, Mr. Tulkinghorn has[Pg 162] stood off to the side by the old suitcase, hands behind his back, seemingly detached from all three types of interest displayed near the bed—from the young surgeon's professional fascination with death, quite separate from his comments about the deceased as a person; from the old man's sentimental demeanor; and from the little crazy woman's sense of wonder. His unchanging face has been as expressionless as his worn-out clothes. One couldn't even say he has been thinking all this time. He has shown neither patience nor impatience, nor attention nor distraction. He has revealed nothing but his exterior. As easily as one could infer the sound of a delicate musical instrument from its case, one could not deduce the personality of Mr. Tulkinghorn from his exterior.

He now interposes; addressing the young surgeon, in his unmoved, professional way.

He now interrupts, speaking to the young surgeon in his calm, professional manner.

"I looked in here," he observes, "just before you, with the intention of giving this deceased man, whom I never saw alive, some employment at his trade of copying. I had heard of him from my stationer—Snagsby of Cook's Court. Since no one here knows any thing about him, it might be as well to send for Snagsby. Ah!" to the little crazy woman, who has often seen him in Court, and whom he has often seen, and who proposes, in frightened dumb-show, to go for the law stationer. "Suppose you do!"

"I looked in here," he says, "just before you, planning to give this deceased man, whom I never knew when he was alive, some work in his trade of copying. I learned about him from my stationer—Snagsby of Cook's Court. Since no one here knows anything about him, it might be a good idea to call Snagsby. Ah!" to the little eccentric woman, who has often seen him in Court and whom he has often seen, and who suggests, in nervous gestures, going to get the law stationer. "Why don't you do that!"

While she is gone, the surgeon abandons his hopeless investigation, and covers its subject with the patchwork counterpane. Mr. Krook and he interchange a word or two. Mr. Tulkinghorn says nothing; but stands, ever, near the old portmanteau.

While she's away, the surgeon gives up his pointless examination and covers the body with the patchwork quilt. Mr. Krook and he exchange a word or two. Mr. Tulkinghorn doesn't say anything; he just stands close to the old suitcase.

Mr. Snagsby arrives hastily, in his gray coat and his black sleeves. "Dear me, dear me," he says; "and it has come to this, has it! Bless my soul!"

Mr. Snagsby rushes in, wearing his gray coat and black sleeves. "Oh my, oh my," he says; "is it really come to this? Goodness gracious!"

"Can you give the person of the house any information about this unfortunate creature, Snagsby?" inquires Mr. Tulkinghorn. "He was in arrears with his rent, it seems. And he must be buried, you know."

"Could you share any information with the person in charge of the house about this unfortunate soul, Snagsby?" Mr. Tulkinghorn asks. "It seems he was behind on his rent. And he needs to be buried, you know."

"Well, sir," says Mr. Snagsby, coughing his apologetic cough behind his hand; "I really don't know what advice I could offer, except sending for the beadle."

"Well, sir," Mr. Snagsby says, coughing his apologetic cough behind his hand, "I honestly don’t know what advice I could give, except maybe to call for the beadle."

"I don't speak of advice," returns Mr. Tulkinghorn. "I could advise—"

"I don't talk about advice," Mr. Tulkinghorn replies. "I could give advice—"

("No one better, sir, I am sure," says Mr. Snagsby, with his deferential cough.)

("No one is better, sir, I'm sure," says Mr. Snagsby with a respectful cough.)

"I speak of affording some clew to his connections, or to where he came from, or to any thing concerning him."

"I’m talking about providing some clue to his connections, where he came from, or anything about him."

"I assure you, sir," says Mr. Snagsby, after prefacing his reply with his cough of general propitiation, "that I no more know where he came from, than I know—"

"I assure you, sir," Mr. Snagsby says, after clearing his throat in a friendly manner, "that I have no idea where he came from, any more than I know—"

"Where he has gone to, perhaps," suggests the surgeon, to help him out.

"Maybe that's where he has gone," the surgeon suggests to help him out.

A pause. Mr. Tulkinghorn looking at the law-stationer. Mr. Krook, with his mouth open, looking for somebody to speak next.

A pause. Mr. Tulkinghorn is looking at the law-stationer. Mr. Krook, with his mouth open, is waiting for someone to speak next.

"As to his connections, sir," says Mr. Snagsby,[Pg 163] "if a person was to say to me, 'Snagsby, here's twenty thousand pound down, ready for you in the Bank of England, if you'll only name one of 'em, I couldn't do it, sir! About a year and a half ago—to the best of my belief at the time when he first came to lodge at the present Rag and Bottle Shop—"

"As for his connections, sir," says Mr. Snagsby,[Pg 163] "if someone were to say to me, 'Snagsby, here's twenty thousand pounds just waiting for you in the Bank of England, if you'll just name one of them,' I wouldn't be able to do it, sir! About a year and a half ago—if I remember correctly, at the time when he first came to stay at the current Rag and Bottle Shop—"

"That was the time!" says Krook, with a nod.

"That was the moment!" says Krook, with a nod.

"About a year and a half ago," says Mr. Snagsby, strengthened, "he came into our place one morning after breakfast, and, finding my little woman (which I name Mrs. Snagsby when I use that appellation) in our shop, produced a specimen of his handwriting, and gave her to understand that he was in wants of copying work to do, and was—not to put too fine a point upon it—" a favorite apology for plain-speaking with Mr. Snagsby, which he always offers with a sort of argumentative frankness, "hard up! My little woman is not in general partial to strangers, particular—not to put too fine a point upon it—when they want any thing. But she was rather took by something about this person; whether by his being unshaved, or by his hair being in want of attention, or by what other ladies' reasons, I leave you to judge; and she accepted of the specimen, and likewise of the address. My little woman hasn't a good ear for names," proceeds Mr. Snagsby, after consulting his cough of consideration behind his hand, "and she considered Nemo equally the same as Nimrod. In consequence of which, she got into a habit of saying to me at meals, 'Mr. Snagsby, you haven't found Nimrod any work yet!' or 'Mr. Snagsby, why didn't you give that eight-and-thirty Chancery folio in Jarndyce, to Nimrod?' or such like. And that is the way he gradually fell into job-work at our place; and that is the most I know of him, except that he was a quick hand, and a hand not sparing of night-work; and that if you gave him out, say five-and-forty folio on the Wednesday night, you would have it brought in on the Thursday morning. All of which—" Mr. Snagsby concludes by politely motioning with his hat toward the bed, as much as to add, "I have no doubt my honorable friend would confirm, if he were in a condition to do it."

"About a year and a half ago," says Mr. Snagsby, feeling stronger, "he came into our shop one morning after breakfast and, finding my wife—which I call Mrs. Snagsby when I mention her—showed her some of his handwriting and let her know he was looking for copying work. To put it bluntly—it’s a favorite way of speaking candidly that Mr. Snagsby often uses—he was 'hard up!' My wife usually isn't fond of strangers, especially when they want something. But there was something about this guy that caught her interest; whether it was his unshaved look, his messy hair, or some other reason known only to women, I'll leave that to your imagination. She accepted the writing sample and his contact information. My wife isn’t great with names," Mr. Snagsby continues after a thoughtful cough behind his hand, "and she ended up mixing up Nemo with Nimrod. Because of this, she would often say to me during meals, 'Mr. Snagsby, you haven't found Nimrod any work yet!' or 'Mr. Snagsby, why didn’t you give that thirty-eight folio from Jarndyce to Nimrod?' or things like that. That’s how he gradually started getting jobs with us, and that’s about all I know of him, except that he worked quickly and didn’t mind working late. If you gave him, say, forty-five folios on Wednesday night, you’d have them back Thursday morning. All of which—" Mr. Snagsby finishes by politely gesturing with his hat towards the bed, implying, "I’m sure my esteemed friend would back this up if he were able to."

"Hadn't you better see," says Mr. Tulkinghorn to Krook, "whether he had any papers that may enlighten you? There will be an Inquest, and you will be asked the question. You can read?"

"Maybe you should check," Mr. Tulkinghorn says to Krook, "if he had any papers that could help clarify things? There will be an Inquest, and you’ll be asked about it. You can read, right?"

"No, I can't," returns the old man, with a sudden grin.

"No, I can't," replies the old man, breaking into a sudden grin.

"Snagsby," says Mr. Tulkinghorn, "look over the room for him. He will get into some trouble or difficulty, otherwise. Being here, I'll wait, if you make haste; and then I can testify on his behalf, if it should ever be necessary, that all was fair and right. If you will hold the candle for Mr. Snagsby, my friend, he'll soon see whether there is any thing to help you."

"Snagsby," says Mr. Tulkinghorn, "check the room for him. He could get into some trouble or a sticky situation otherwise. While you're doing that, I'll wait here; and if needed, I can vouch for him later, saying that everything was fair and square. If you hold the candle for Mr. Snagsby, my friend, he'll quickly find out if there's anything that can help you."

"In the first place, here's an old portmanteau, sir," says Snagsby.

"In the first place, here’s an old suitcase, sir," says Snagsby.

Ah, to be sure, so there is! Mr. Tulkinghorn does not appear to have seen it before, though he is standing so close to it, and though there is very little else, Heaven knows.

Ah, for sure, there it is! Mr. Tulkinghorn doesn’t seem to have noticed it before, even though he’s standing right next to it, and there’s hardly anything else, that’s for sure.

The marine-store merchant holds the light, and the law-stationer conducts the search. The surgeon leans against a corner of the chimney-piece; Miss Flite peeps and trembles just within the door. The apt old scholar of the old school, with his dull black breeches tied with ribbons at the knees, his large black waistcoat, his long-sleeved black coat, and his wisp of limp white neck-kerchief tied in the bow the Peerage knows so well, stands in exactly the same place and attitude.

The marine store owner holds the light, and the legal stationery supplier leads the search. The surgeon is leaning against the corner of the fireplace; Miss Flite is peeking and trembling just inside the door. The skilled old scholar from the past, with his dull black pants tied with ribbons at the knees, his big black vest, his long-sleeved black coat, and his limp white neckerchief tied in the familiar bow known to the nobility, is standing in exactly the same spot and posture.

There are some worthless articles of clothing in the old portmanteau; there is a bundle of pawnbrokers' duplicates, those turnpike tickets on the road of Poverty, there is a crumpled paper, smelling of opium, on which are scrawled rough memoranda—as, took, such a day, so many grains; took, such another day, so many more—begun some time ago, as if with the intention of being regularly continued, but soon left off. There are a few dirty scraps of newspapers, all referring to Coroners' Inquests; there is nothing else. They search the cupboard, and the drawer of the ink-splashed table. There is not a morsel of an old letter, or of any other writing, in either. The young surgeon examines the dress on the law-writer. A knife and some odd halfpence are all he finds. Mr. Snagsby's suggestion is the practical suggestion after all, and the beadle must be called in.

There are some useless clothes in the old suitcase; there’s a bunch of pawn tickets, the tolls on the road to Poverty. There’s a crumpled piece of paper that smells like opium, covered in messy notes—like, took on such a day, this many grains; took on another day, this many more—started a while ago, as if meant to be tracked regularly, but then it stopped. There are a few dirty scraps of newspapers, all about Coroners' Inquests; there’s nothing else. They search the cupboard and the drawer of the ink-stained table. There's not even a fragment of an old letter or any other writing in either one. The young surgeon checks the attire on the law-writer. A knife and some loose change are all he finds. Mr. Snagsby's suggestion turns out to be the most practical, and the beadle needs to be called in.

So the little crazy lodger goes for the beadle, and the rest come out of the room. "Don't leave the cat there!" says the surgeon: "that won't do!" Mr. Krook therefore drives her out before him; and she goes furtively down stairs, winding her lithe tail and licking her lips.

So, the quirky lodger heads off to find the beadle, and the others exit the room. "Don't leave the cat there!" the surgeon exclaims. "That's not okay!" Mr. Krook then shooes her out ahead of him, and she slinks down the stairs, curling her flexible tail and licking her lips.

"Good-night!" says Mr. Tulkinghorn; and goes home to Allegory and meditation.

"Good night!" says Mr. Tulkinghorn; and heads home for some reflection and deep thinking.

By this time the news has got into the court. Groups of its inhabitants assemble to discuss the thing; and the outposts of the army of observation (principally boys) are pushed forward to Mr. Krook's window, which they closely invest. A policeman has already walked up to the room, and walked down again to the door, where he stands like a tower, only condescending to see the boys at his base occasionally; but whenever he does see them, they quail and fall back. Mrs. Perkins, who has not been for some weeks on speaking terms with Mrs. Piper, in consequence of an unpleasantness originating in young Perkins having "fetched" young Piper "a crack," renews her friendly intercourse on this auspicious occasion. The pot-boy at the corner, who is a privileged amateur, as possessing official knowledge of life, and having to deal with drunken men occasionally, exchanges confidential communications with the policeman, and has the appearance of an impregnable youth, unassailable by truncheons and unconfinable in station-houses. People talk across the court out of window, and bare-headed[Pg 165] scouts come hurrying in from Chancery Lane to know what's the matter. The general feeling seems to be that it's a blessing Mr. Krook warn't made away with first, mingled with a little natural disappointment that he was not. In the midst of this sensation, the beadle arrives.

By this time, the news has reached the court. Groups of people have gathered to discuss it, and the lookouts (mostly boys) have crowded around Mr. Krook's window. A policeman has already walked up to the room and then back down to the door, where he stands like a statue, only occasionally glancing at the boys below; whenever he does, they shrink back. Mrs. Perkins, who hasn’t spoken to Mrs. Piper for weeks due to a disagreement over young Perkins giving young Piper a smack, decides to reconnect on this notable occasion. The pot-boy at the corner, who is a sort of amateur expert with official knowledge of life and occasionally deals with drunk men, shares confidential exchanges with the policeman and appears unimpeachable, immune to truncheons and not easily locked up. People shout across the court from their windows, and bare-headed scouts rush in from Chancery Lane to find out what’s going on. The overall sentiment seems to be a mix of relief that Mr. Krook wasn’t harmed first, along with a bit of natural disappointment that he wasn’t. In the midst of this commotion, the beadle arrives.

The beadle, though generally understood in the neighborhood to be a ridiculous institution, is not without a certain popularity for the moment, if it were only as a man who is going to see the body. The policeman considers him an imbecile civilian, a remnant of the barbarous watchmen-times; but gives him admission, as something that must be borne with until Government shall abolish him. The sensation is heightened, as the tidings spread from mouth to mouth that the beadle is on the ground, and has gone in.

The beadle, though generally seen as a ridiculous figure in the neighborhood, has a bit of popularity right now, mainly because he’s the one who’s going to see the body. The policeman views him as a foolish civilian, a leftover from the old days of watchmen; however, he lets him in, considering him an annoyance that will eventually be removed by the government. The buzz increases as word spreads from person to person that the beadle is on the scene and has gone inside.

By-and-by the beadle comes out, once more intensifying the sensation, which has rather languished in the interval. He is understood to be in want of witnesses, for the Inquest to-morrow, who can tell the Coroner and Jury any thing whatever respecting the deceased. Is immediately referred to innumerable people who can tell nothing whatever. Is made more imbecile by being constantly informed that Mrs. Green's son "was a law-writer his-self, and knowed him better than any body"—which son of Mrs. Green's appears, on inquiry, to be at the present time aboard a vessel bound for China, three months out, but considered accessible by telegraph, on application to the Lords of the Admiralty. Beadle goes into various shops and parlors, examining the inhabitants; always shutting the door first, and by exclusion, delay, and general idiotcy, exasperating the public. Policeman seen to smile to potboy. Public loses interest, and undergoes re-action. Taunts the beadle, in shrill, youthful voices, with having boiled a boy; choruses fragments of a popular song to that effect, and importing that the boy was made into soup for the workhouse. Policeman at last finds it necessary to support the law, and seize a vocalist; who is released upon the flight of the rest, on condition of his getting out of this then, come! and cutting it—a condition he immediately observes. So the sensation dies off for the time; and the unmoved policeman (to whom a little opium, more or less, is nothing), with his shining hat, stiff stock, inflexible great-coat, stout belt and bracelet, and all things fitting, pursues his lounging way with a heavy tread: beating the palms of his white gloves one against the other, and stopping now and then at a street-corner, to look casually about for any thing between a lost child and a murder.

Eventually, the beadle steps out again, reigniting the dwindling excitement. He's looking for witnesses for tomorrow's inquest who can provide the Coroner and Jury with any information about the deceased. He's immediately pointed to countless people who can’t tell him anything useful. He becomes more foolish as he hears repeatedly that Mrs. Green's son "was a legal writer himself and knew him better than anyone"—though upon investigation, it turns out Mrs. Green's son is currently three months into a trip aboard a ship headed for China, but can be contacted by telegraph through the Lords of the Admiralty. The beadle goes into various shops and parlors, questioning the people inside; always closing the door first, and through exclusion, delays, and sheer stupidity, he frustrates the public. A policeman is seen smiling at the bar staff. The public loses interest and starts to react. They mock the beadle with shrill, youthful voices for supposedly having boiled a boy; they sing parts of a popular song suggesting that the boy was turned into soup for the workhouse. Eventually, the policeman feels the need to uphold the law and detains a singer; he’s let go when the others flee, under the condition that he leaves immediately and stops. He complies right away. So, for now, the excitement fades; the unfazed policeman (to him, a little opium is no big deal), with his shiny hat, stiff collar, rigid greatcoat, sturdy belt and bracelet, and everything in its place, continues on his leisurely way with a heavy step: clapping his white gloves together and occasionally stopping at a street corner to casually look around for anything from a lost child to a murder.

Under cover of the night, the feeble-minded beadle comes flitting about Chancery Lane with his summonses, in which every Juror's name is wrongly spelt, and nothing is rightly spelt, but the beadle's own name which nobody can read or wants to know. His summonses served, and his witnesses forewarned, the beadle goes to Mr. Krook's, to keep a small appointment he has made with[Pg 166] certain paupers; who, presently arriving, are conducted up-stairs; where they leave the great eyes in the shutter something new to stare at, in that last shape which earthly lodgings take for No one—and for Every one.

Under the cover of night, the clueless beadle flits around Chancery Lane with his summonses, in which every juror's name is misspelled, and nothing is spelled correctly except for the beadle's own name, which no one can read or cares to know. After delivering his summonses and warning his witnesses, the beadle heads to Mr. Krook's to keep a small appointment he has scheduled with[Pg 166] some paupers; who, upon arriving, are taken upstairs, where they leave the big eyes in the shutter with something new to stare at, in that final shape that earthly lodgings take for no one—and for everyone.

And, all that night, the coffin stands ready by the old portmanteau; and the lonely figure on the bed, whose path in life has lain through five-and-forty years, lies there, with no more track behind him, that any one can trace, than a deserted infant.

And all that night, the coffin is ready by the old suitcase, and the lonely figure on the bed, whose life has spanned forty-five years, lies there, leaving behind no more trace than a deserted baby.

Next day the court is all alive—is like a fair, as Mrs. Perkins, more than reconciled to Mrs Piper, says, in amicable conversation with that excellent woman. The coroner is to sit in the first-floor room at the Sol's Arms, where the Harmonic Meetings take place twice a week, and where the chair is filled by a gentleman of professional celebrity, faced by little Swills, the comic vocalist, who hopes (according to the bill in the window) that his friends will rally round him and support first-rate talent. The Sol's Arms does a brisk stroke of business all the morning. Even children so require sustaining, under the general excitement, that a pieman, who has established himself for the occasion at the corner of the court, says his brandy-balls go off like smoke. What time the beadle, hovering between the door of Mr. Krook's establishment and the door of the Sol's Arms, shows the curiosity in his keeping to a few discreet spirits, and accepts the compliment of a glass of ale or so in return.

The next day, the court is buzzing—it feels like a fair, as Mrs. Perkins, now friendly with Mrs. Piper, chats amiably with that wonderful woman. The coroner will meet in the first-floor room at the Sol's Arms, where the Harmonic Meetings happen twice a week, and the chair is filled by a well-known professional, facing off against little Swills, the comic singer, who is hoping (according to the poster in the window) that his friends will come out to support top-notch talent. The Sol's Arms is doing a lively business all morning. Even kids need a snack amidst the excitement, so a pie vendor set up at the corner of the court claims his brandy balls are selling like hotcakes. Meanwhile, the beadle, lingering between the door of Mr. Krook's place and the entrance of the Sol's Arms, shows off his curiosity to a few discreet onlookers and happily accepts a glass of ale or two in return.

At the appointed hour arrives the Coroner, for whom the Jurymen are waiting, and who is received with a salute of skittles from the good dry skittle-ground attached to the Sol's Arms. The Coroner frequents more public-houses than any man alive. The smell of sawdust, beer, tobacco-smoke, and spirits, is inseparable in his vocation from death in its most awful shapes. He is conducted by the beadle and the landlord to the Harmonic Meeting Room, where he puts his hat on the piano, and takes a Windsor-chair at the head of a long table, formed of several short tables put together, and ornamented with glutinous rings in endless involutions, made by pots and glasses. As many of the Jury as can crowd together at the table sit there. The rest get among the spittoons and pipes, or lean against the piano. Over the Coroner's head is a small iron garland, the pendant handle of a bell, which rather gives the Majesty of the Court the appearance of going to be hanged presently.

At the scheduled time, the Coroner shows up, greeted by the Jurymen who are waiting for him, and he receives a salute of skittles from the good dry skittle-ground at the Sol's Arms. The Coroner visits more pubs than anyone else around. The scents of sawdust, beer, tobacco smoke, and liquor are always mixed with death in its most horrifying forms in his line of work. He's led by the beadle and the landlord to the Harmonic Meeting Room, where he places his hat on the piano and takes a Windsor chair at the head of a long table made up of several short tables pushed together, decorated with sticky rings from pots and glasses. As many of the Jury members as can fit around the table sit there. The others find spots among the spittoons and pipes, or lean against the piano. Above the Coroner's head hangs a small iron garland, the dangling handle of a bell, which gives the Court an oddly ominous vibe, as if someone is about to be hanged.

Call over and swear the Jury! While the ceremony is in progress, sensation is created by the entrance of a chubby little man in a large shirt-collar, with a moist eye, and an inflamed nose, who modestly takes a position near the door as one of the general public, but seems familiar with the room too. A whisper circulates that this is little Swills. It is considered not unlikely that he will get up an imitation of the Coroner, and make it the principal feature of the Harmonic Meeting in the evening.

Call over and swear in the jury! While the ceremony is happening, there's a buzz when a chubby little man with a big shirt collar enters, his eyes watery and his nose red. He shyly stands near the door as if he's just part of the crowd, but he seems to know the place well too. A whisper goes around that this is little Swills. People think it’s quite possible he’ll do an impression of the Coroner and make it the highlight of the Harmonic Meeting tonight.

"Well, gentlemen—" the Coroner begins.

"Well, guys—" the Coroner begins.

"Silence there, will you!" says the beadle. Not to the Coroner, though it might appear so.

"Be quiet now!" says the beadle. Not to the Coroner, even though it might seem that way.

"Well, gentlemen!" resumes the Coroner. "You are impaneled here, to inquire into the death of a certain man. Evidence will be given before you, as to the circumstances attending that death, and you will give your verdict according to the—skittles; they must be stopped, you know, beadle!—evidence, and not according to any thing else. The first thing to be done, is to view the body."

"Alright, gentlemen!" the Coroner continues. "You are gathered here to investigate the death of a certain man. Evidence will be presented to you regarding the circumstances surrounding that death, and you will deliver your verdict based on the evidence, and not on anything else. The first thing we need to do is examine the body."

"Make way there!" cries the beadle.

"Clear the way!" shouts the beadle.

So they go out in a loose procession, something after the manner of a straggling funeral, and make their inspection in Mr. Krook's back second floor, from which a few of the Jurymen retire pale and precipitately. The beadle is very careful that two gentlemen not very neat about the cuffs and buttons (for whose accommodation he has provided a special little table near the Coroner, in the Harmonic Meeting Room), should see all that is to be seen. For they are the public chroniclers of such inquiries, by the line; and he is not superior to the universal human infirmity, but hopes to read in print what "Mooney, the active and intelligent beadle of the district," said and did; and even aspires to see the name of Mooney is familiarly and patronizingly mentioned as the name of the Hangman is, according to the latest examples.

So they head out in a loose procession, somewhat like a wandering funeral, and do their inspection in Mr. Krook's back second floor, from which a few of the jurors leave looking pale and in a hurry. The beadle makes sure that two gentlemen who aren’t very tidy about their cuffs and buttons (for whom he has set up a special little table near the Coroner in the Harmonic Meeting Room) see everything. They are the public record-keepers of these inquiries, and he isn’t above the universal human weakness; he hopes to read in print what “Mooney, the active and knowledgeable beadle of the district,” said and did, and even aims to see Mooney’s name mentioned in a familiar and condescending way, like the name of the Hangman is in the latest examples.

Little Swills is waiting for the Coroner and Jury on their return. Mr. Tulkinghorn, also. Mr. Tulkinghorn is received with distinction, and seated near the Coroner; between that high judicial officer, a bagatelle board, and the coal-box. The inquiry proceeds. The Jury learn how the subject of their inquiry died, and learn no more about him. "A very eminent solicitor is in attendance, gentlemen," says the Coroner, "who, I am informed, was accidentally present, when discovery of the death was made; but he could only repeat the evidence you have already heard from the surgeon, the landlord, the lodger, and the law-stationer; and it is not necessary to trouble him. Is any body in attendance who knows any thing more?"

Little Swills is waiting for the Coroner and Jury to return. Mr. Tulkinghorn is also there. He’s welcomed with respect and sits near the Coroner, wedged between that high judicial officer, a bagatelle board, and the coal-box. The inquiry continues. The Jury finds out how the person they are investigating died and nothing more about him. "A very distinguished solicitor is present, gentlemen," says the Coroner, "who, I’ve been told, was accidentally there when the death was discovered; but he can only repeat the evidence you’ve already heard from the surgeon, the landlord, the lodger, and the law-stationer; so it’s not necessary to bother him. Is there anyone here who knows anything more?"

Mrs. Piper pushed forward by Mrs. Perkins. Mrs. Piper sworn.

Mrs. Piper was urged on by Mrs. Perkins. Mrs. Piper took an oath.

Anastasia Piper, gentlemen. Married woman. Now, Mrs. Piper—what have you got to say about this?

Anastasia Piper, gentlemen. Married woman. Now, Mrs. Piper—what do you have to say about this?

Why, Mrs. Piper has a good deal to say, chiefly in parenthesis and without punctuation, but not much to tell. Mrs. Piper lives in the court (which her husband is a cabinet-maker) and it has long been well beknown among the neighbors (counting from the day next but one before the half-baptizing of Alexander James Piper aged eighteen months and four days old on accounts of not being expected to live such was the sufferings gentlemen of that child in his gums) as the Plaintive—so Mrs. Piper insists on calling the deceased—was reported to have sold himself. Thinks it was the Plaintive's air in which that report originatinin. See the Plaintive often, and[Pg 168] considered as his air was feariocious, and not to be allowed to go about some children being timid (and if doubted hoping Mrs. Perkins may be brought forard for she is here and will do credit to her husband and herself and family). Has seen the Plaintive wexed and worrited by the children (for children they will ever be and you can not expect them specially if of playful dispositions to be Methoozellers which you was not yourself). On accounts of this and his dark looks has often dreamed as she see him take a pick-ax from his pocket and split Johnny's head (which the child knows not fear and has repeatually called after him close at his heels). Never however see the plaintive take a pick-ax or any other wepping far from it. Has seen him hurry away when run and called after as if not partial to children and never see him speak to neither child nor grown person at any time (excepting the boy that sweeps the crossing down the lane over the way round the corner which if he was here would tell you that he has been seen a speaking to him frequent).

Why, Mrs. Piper has a lot to say, mostly in parentheses and without punctuation, but not much to share. Mrs. Piper lives in the court (where her husband is a cabinet-maker) and it has long been well known among the neighbors (counting from the day right before the half-baptizing of Alexander James Piper, who was eighteen months and four days old and was not expected to survive due to the suffering the poor child endured in his gums). The deceased, whom Mrs. Piper insists on calling the Plaintive, was rumored to have sold himself. She thinks it was the Plaintive's demeanor that started that rumor. She sees the Plaintive often and considers his demeanor frightening, and believes he shouldn't be around certain children because they are timid (and if there are any doubts, Mrs. Perkins can be brought forward as she is here and will do credit to her husband, herself, and her family). She has seen the Plaintive upset and bothered by the children (because children they will always be, especially if they are playful, and you cannot expect them to be Methuselahs, which you were not yourself). Because of this and his dark looks, she often dreams of seeing him take a pickaxe from his pocket and split Johnny's head (who knows no fear and has repeatedly called after him, close at his heels). However, she has never actually seen the Plaintive take a pickaxe or any other weapon; far from it. She has seen him hurry away when chased and called after, as if he doesn't like children, and she has never seen him speak to a child or an adult at any time (except for the boy who sweeps the crossing down the lane across the way, who, if he were here, would tell you that he has often been seen talking to him).

Says the Coroner, is that boy here? Says the beadle, no, sir, he is not here. Says the Coroner, go and fetch him, then. In the absence of the active and intelligent, the Coroner converses with Mr. Tulkinghorn.

Says the Coroner, is that boy here? Says the beadle, no, sir, he is not here. Says the Coroner, go and get him, then. In the absence of the active and intelligent, the Coroner chats with Mr. Tulkinghorn.

O! Here's the boy, gentlemen!

Oh! Here's the guy, everyone!

Here he is, very muddy, very hoarse, very ragged. Now, boy!—But stop a minute. Caution. This boy must be put through a few preliminary paces.

Here he is, really muddy, really hoarse, and really ragged. Now, kid!—But hold on a second. Be careful. This kid needs to go through a few preliminary tests.

Name, Jo. Nothing else that he knows on. Don't know that every body has two names. Never heerd of sich a thing. Don't know that Jo is short for a longer name. Thinks it long enough for him. He don't find no fault with it. Spell it? No. He can't spell it. No father, no mother, no friends. Never been to school. What's home? Knows a broom's a broom, and knows it's wicked to tell a lie. Don't recollect who told him about the broom, or about the lie, but knows both. Can't exactly say what'll be done to him arter he's dead if he tells a lie to the gentlemen here, but believes it'll be something wery bad to punish him, and serve him right—and so he'll tell the truth.

Name, Jo. He doesn't know much else. He doesn't understand that everyone has two names. Never heard of such a thing. He doesn't think Jo is short for a longer name. He thinks it's long enough for him. He doesn't have any complaints about it. Spell it? No, he can't spell it. No father, no mother, no friends. Never been to school. What's home? He knows a broom is a broom, and he knows it's wrong to lie. He doesn't remember who told him about the broom or the lie, but he knows both things. He can't say for sure what will happen to him after he's dead if he lies to the gentlemen here, but he believes it will be something very bad to punish him, and he thinks he deserves it—so he'll tell the truth.

"This won't do, gentlemen!" says the Coroner, with a melancholy shake of the head.

"This isn't going to work, gentlemen!" says the Coroner, shaking his head sadly.

"Don't you think you can receive his evidence, sir?" asks an attentive Juryman.

"Don’t you think you can take his evidence, sir?" asks an interested juror.

"Out of the question," says the Coroner. "You have heard the boy. 'Can't exactly say' won't do, you know. We can't take that, in a Court of Justice, gentlemen. It's terrible depravity. Put the boy aside."

"Not happening," says the Coroner. "You’ve heard the boy. 'I can’t exactly say' won’t cut it, you know. We can’t accept that in a court of law, gentlemen. It’s pure depravity. Set the boy aside."

Boy put aside; to the great edification of the audience;—especially of Little Swills, the Comic Vocalist.

Boy put aside; to the great enjoyment of the audience;—especially of Little Swills, the Comic Vocalist.

Now. Is there any other witness? No other witness.

Now. Is there any other witness? No other witness.

Very well, gentlemen! Here's a man unknown, proved to have been in the habit of taking opium in large quantities for a year and a[Pg 169] half, found dead of too much opium. If you think you have any evidence to lead you to the conclusion that he committed suicide, you will come to that conclusion. If you think it is a case of accidental death, you will find a Verdict accordingly.

Very well, gentlemen! Here’s a man we don’t know, who has been taking large amounts of opium for a year and a[Pg 169] half, found dead from an overdose. If you believe there's evidence to suggest he took his own life, go ahead and conclude that. If you think it was just an accidental death, then you’ll find a verdict to reflect that.

Verdict Accordingly. Accidental death. No doubt. Gentlemen, you are discharged. Good afternoon.

Verdict: Accidental death. No doubt about it. Gentlemen, you are dismissed. Have a good afternoon.

While the Coroner buttons his great coat, Mr. Tulkinghorn and he give private audience to the rejected witness in a corner.

While the Coroner fastens his overcoat, Mr. Tulkinghorn and he hold a private meeting with the rejected witness in a corner.

That graceless creature only knows that the dead man (whom he recognized just now by his yellow face and black hair) was sometimes hooted and pursued about the streets. That one cold winter night, when he, the boy, was shivering in a doorway near his crossing, the man turned to look at him, and came back, and, having questioned him and found that he had not a friend in the world, said, "Neither have I. Not one!" and gave him the price of a supper and a night's lodging. That the man had often spoken to him since; and asked him whether he slept sound at night, and how he bore cold and hunger, and whether he ever wished to die; and similar strange questions. That when the man had no money, he would say in passing, "I am as poor as you to-day, Jo;" but that when he had any he had always (as the boy most heartily believes) been glad to give him some.

That awkward guy only knows that the dead man (who he just recognized by his yellow face and black hair) was sometimes mocked and chased around the streets. One cold winter night, when he, the boy, was shivering in a doorway near his crossing, the man turned to look at him, came back, and after asking him questions and discovering that he had no one in the world, said, "Neither do I. Not a single person!" and gave him enough money for dinner and a place to sleep. The man had often talked to him since then; he asked if he slept well at night, how he dealt with the cold and hunger, if he ever wished he could die, and other strange questions. When the man had no money, he would say as he passed by, "I’m as broke as you today, Jo;" but whenever he did have some, he had always (as the boy wholeheartedly believes) been happy to share it with him.

"He wos wery good to me," says the boy, wiping his eyes with his wretched sleeve. "Wen I see him a layin' so stritched out just now, I wished he could have heerd me tell him so. He wos wery good to me, he wos!"

"He was really good to me," says the boy, wiping his eyes with his ragged sleeve. "When I saw him lying there so stretched out just now, I wished he could have heard me tell him that. He was really good to me, he was!"

As he shuffles down stairs, Mr. Snagsby, lying in wait for him, puts a half-crown in his hand. "If ever you see me coming past your crossing with my little woman—I mean a lady—" says Mr. Snagsby, with his finger on his nose, "don't allude to it!"

As he walks down the stairs, Mr. Snagsby, waiting for him, slips a half-crown into his hand. "If you ever see me passing your crossing with my little woman—I mean a lady—" says Mr. Snagsby, with his finger on his nose, "don’t bring it up!"

For some little time the Jurymen hang about the Sol's Arms colloquially. In the sequel, half a dozen are caught up in a cloud of pipe-smoke that pervades the parlor of the Sol's Arms; two stroll to Hampstead: and four engage to go half-price to the play at night, and top up with oysters. Little Swills is treated on several hands. Being asked what he thinks of the proceedings, characterizes them (his strength lying in a slangular direction) as "a rummy start." The landlord of the Sol's Arms, rinding Little Swills so popular, commends him highly to the Jurymen and public; observing that, for a song in character, he don't know his equal, and that that man's character-wardrobe would fill a cart.

For a little while, the jurors hang out at the Sol's Arms casually. Later, half a dozen of them get caught up in a cloud of pipe smoke that fills the parlor of the Sol's Arms; two take a walk to Hampstead, and four decide to go to the theater for half-price tickets at night and grab some oysters afterward. Little Swills gets treated by several people. When asked what he thinks of the situation, he describes it (his strength being in a slangular direction) as "a strange start." The landlord of the Sol's Arms, noticing how popular Little Swills is, praises him highly to the jurors and the public, remarking that for a character song, he doesn't know anyone better, and that man's collection of costumes would fill a cart.

Thus, gradually the Sol's Arms melts into the shadowy night, and then flares out of it strong in gas. The Harmonic Meeting hour arriving, the gentleman of professional celebrity takes the chair; is faced (red-faced) by Little Swills; their friends rally round them, and support first-rate talent. In the zenith of the evening, Little Swills says, Gentlemen, if you'll permit me, I'll[Pg 170] attempt a short description of a scene of real life that came off here to-day. Is much applauded and encouraged; goes out of the room as Swills; comes in as the Coroner (not the least in the world like him); describes the Inquest, with recreative intervals of piano-forte accompaniment to the refrain—With his (the Coroner's) tippy tol li doll, tippy tol lo doll, tippy tol li doll, Dee!

Thus, gradually, the Sol's Arms fades into the shadowy night and then bursts back into it, aflame with gas. As the Harmonic Meeting hour arrives, the gentleman of professional fame takes the chair, confronted (red-faced) by Little Swills; their friends gather around them, supporting top-notch talent. At the peak of the evening, Little Swills says, “Gentlemen, if you'll allow me, I'll[Pg 170] try a short description of a real-life scene that took place here today.” He is met with applause and encouragement; he leaves the room as Swills and re-enters as the Coroner (not at all resembling him); he describes the Inquest, interspersed with playful piano music accompanying the refrain—“With his (the Coroner's) tippy tol li doll, tippy tol lo doll, tippy tol li doll, Dee!”

The jingling piano at last is silent, and the Harmonic friends rally round their pillows. Then there is rest around the lonely figure, now laid in its last earthly habitation; and it is watched by the gaunt eyes in the shutters through some quiet hours of night. If this forlorn man could have been prophetically seen lying here, by the mother at whose breast he nestled, a little child, with eyes upraised to her loving face, and soft hand scarcely knowing how to close upon the neck to which it crept, what an impossibility the vision would have seemed! O, if, in brighter days, the now-extinguished fire within him ever burned for one woman who held him in her heart, where is she, while these ashes are above the ground!

The jingling piano finally falls silent, and the Harmonic friends gather around their pillows. Then there is stillness around the lonely figure now laid in its final resting place, watched over by the hollow eyes peering through the shutters during the quiet hours of night. If this forlorn man could have been seen lying here by the mother who held him as a child, with eyes looking up to her loving face and a tiny hand unsure how to grasp the neck it clung to, what an impossible vision that would have seemed! Oh, if, in happier times, the now-extinguished fire inside him ever burned for just one woman who cherished him, where is she now while these ashes rest above the ground!

It is any thing but a night of rest at Mr. Snagsby's, in Cook's Court; where Guster murders sleep, by going, as Mr. Snagsby himself allows—not to put too fine a point upon it—out of one fit into twenty. The occasion of this seizure is, that Guster has a tender heart, and a susceptible something that possibly might have been imagination, but for Tooting and her patron saint. Be it what it may, now, it was so direfully impressed at tea-time by Mr. Snagsby's account of the inquiry at which he had assisted, that at supper-time she projected herself into the kitchen preceded by a flying Dutch-cheese, and fell into a fit of unusual duration: which she only came out of to go into another, and another, and so on through a chain of fits, with short intervals between, of which she has pathetically availed herself by consuming them in entreaties to Mrs. Snagsby not to give her warning "when she quite comes to;" and also in appeals to the whole establishment to lay her down on the stones, and go to bed. Hence, Mr. Snagsby, at last hearing the cock at the little dairy in Cursitor-street go into that disinterested ecstasy of his on the subject of daylight, says, drawing a long breath, though the most patient of men, "I thought you was dead, I am sure!"

It’s anything but a restful night at Mr. Snagsby’s in Cook's Court, where Guster can’t seem to get any sleep, as Mr. Snagsby himself admits—not to be too harsh about it—she keeps shifting from one fit to another. The reason for this episode is that Guster has a kind heart and a sensitive imagination, possibly, influenced by Tooting and her patron saint. Whatever it is, she was so deeply affected at tea time by Mr. Snagsby's story about the inquiry he attended, that by supper time she rushed into the kitchen, startled by a flying Dutch cheese, and fell into a fit that lasted quite a while. She only came out of that one just to go into another, and then another, and so on through a series of fits, with only brief breaks in between, which she used to plead with Mrs. Snagsby not to fire her "when she gets back to her senses," as well as begging everyone in the house to just lay her down on the floor and let them sleep. So, when Mr. Snagsby finally hears the rooster at the little dairy in Cursitor Street crowing his heart out about the arrival of daylight, he sighs deeply, despite being the most patient of men, and says, "I thought you were dead, I really did!"

What question this enthusiastic fowl supposes he settles when he strains himself to such an extent, or why he should thus crow (so men crow on various triumphant public occasions, however) about what can not be of any moment to him, is his affair. It is enough that daylight comes, morning comes, noon comes.

What question this excited bird thinks he answers when he pushes himself so hard, or why he crows like this (just like people do on different victorious occasions) about something that doesn’t really matter to him, is up to him. What matters is that daylight comes, morning comes, noon comes.

Then the active and intelligent, who has got into the morning papers as such, comes with his pauper company to Mr. Krook's and bears off the body of our dear brother here departed, to a hemmed-in church-yard, pestiferous and obscene, whence malignant diseases are communicated to the bodies of our dear brothers and sisters who have not departed; while our dear brothers and[Pg 171] sisters who hang about official backstairs—would to Heaven they had departed!—are very complacent and agreeable. Into a beastly scrap of ground which a Turk would reject as a savage abomination, and a Caffre would shudder at, they bring our dear brother here departed, to receive Christian burial.

Then the active and smart guy, who’s been mentioned in the morning papers, shows up with his poor crew at Mr. Krook's and takes away the body of our dear brother who has passed, to a cramped graveyard, filthy and disgusting, from which harmful diseases spread to the bodies of our dear brothers and sisters who are still alive; while our dear brothers and sisters loitering around official back entrances—oh, how I wish they had moved on!—are very self-satisfied and pleasant. They bring our dear brother, who has departed, to a nasty piece of land that even a Turk would turn down as a hideous disgrace, and a Caffre would find horrifying, to give him a Christian burial.

With houses looking on, on every side, save where a reeking little tunnel of a court gives access to the iron gate—with every villainy of life in action close on death, and every poisonous element of death in action close on life—here, they lower our dear brother down a foot or two: here, sow him in corruption, to be raised in corruption; an avenging ghost at many a sick-bedside; a shameful testimony to future ages, how civilization and barbarism walked this boastful island together.

With houses watching from every direction, except for a stinky little alley that leads to the iron gate—where every crime of life is happening close to death, and every toxic aspect of death is happening close to life—here, they lower our beloved brother down a foot or two: here, bury him in decay, to be resurrected in decay; a haunting spirit at many a sickbed; a shameful reminder for future generations of how civilization and barbarism coexisted on this proud island.

Come night, come darkness, for you can not come too soon, or stay too long, by such a place as this! Come, straggling lights into the windows of the ugly houses; and you who do iniquity therein, do it at least with this dread scene shut out! Come, flame of gas, burning so sullenly above the iron gate, on which the poisoned air deposits its witch-ointment slimy to the touch! It is well that you should call to every passer-by, "Look here!"

Come night, come darkness, because you can't arrive too early or linger too long in a place like this! Come, wandering lights into the windows of the ugly houses; and you, who commit wrongs in there, at least do it with this terrible scene blocked out! Come, gas flame, burning so gloomily above the iron gate, where the polluted air leaves its slimy residue! It’s good that you call out to every passerby, "Look here!"

With the night, comes a slouching figure through the tunnel-court, to the outside of the iron gate. It holds the gate with its hands, and looks in between the bars; stands looking in, for a little while.

With the night, a hunched figure appears in the tunnel-court, approaching the iron gate. It grips the gate with its hands and peers between the bars; it stands there looking in for a little while.

It then, with an old broom it carries, softly sweeps the step, and makes the archway clean. It does so, very busily and trimly; looks in again, a little while; and so departs.

It then, with an old broom it carries, gently sweeps the step and cleans the archway. It does this very busily and neatly; looks in again for a moment; and then leaves.

Jo, is it thou? Well, well! Though a rejected witness, who "can't exactly say" what will be done to him in greater hands than men's, thou art not quite in outer darkness. There is something like a distant ray of light in thy muttered reason for this:

Jo, is that you? Well, well! Even though you’re a rejected witness who "can’t quite say" what will happen to you in more powerful hands than men’s, you’re not completely in the dark. There’s something like a faint ray of light in your mumbling reason for this:

"He wos wery good to me, he wos!"

"He was very good to me, he was!"


CHAPTER XII.—On the lookout.

It has left off raining down in Lincolnshire, at last, and Chesney Wold has taken heart. Mrs. Rouncewell is full of hospitable cares, for Sir Leicester and my Lady are coming home from Paris. The fashionable intelligence has found it out, and communicates the glad tidings to benighted England. It has also found out, that they will entertain a brilliant and distinguished circle of the élite of the beau monde (the fashionable intelligence is weak in English, but a giant-refreshed in French), at the ancient and hospitable family seat in Lincolnshire.

It has finally stopped raining in Lincolnshire, and Chesney Wold is feeling optimistic. Mrs. Rouncewell is busy with welcoming preparations since Sir Leicester and Lady are coming back from Paris. The fashion news has caught on and is spreading the good news to the unaware people of England. It has also discovered that they will host a glamorous and distinguished group from the elite of high society (the fashion news isn't great in English, but it's strong in French) at the old and welcoming family home in Lincolnshire.

For the greater honor of the brilliant and distinguished circle, and of Chesney Wold into the bargain, the broken arch of the bridge in the park is mended; and the water, now retired within its proper limits and again spanned gracefully, makes a figure in the prospect from the house. The clear cold sunshine glances into the brittle[Pg 172] woods, and approvingly beholds the sharp wind scattering the leaves and drying the moss. It glides over the park after the moving shadows of the clouds, and chases them, and never catches them, all day. It looks in at the windows, and touches the ancestral portraits with bars and patches of brightness, never contemplated by the painters. Athwart the picture of my Lady, over the great chimney-piece, it throws a broad bend-sinister of light that strikes down crookedly into the hearth, and seems to rend it.

For the greater honor of the brilliant and distinguished group, and of Chesney Wold as well, the broken arch of the bridge in the park has been repaired; and the water, now contained within its proper boundaries and gracefully spanned again, creates a lovely view from the house. The clear, cold sunshine dances into the brittle woods, watching as the sharp wind scatters the leaves and dries the moss. It glides over the park, following the moving shadows of the clouds, chasing them but never catching them all day. It peeks into the windows and touches the ancestral portraits with patches of brightness that the artists never envisioned. Across the portrait of my Lady, above the great chimney, it casts a wide band of light that strikes down crookedly into the hearth, making it seem to split apart.

Through the same cold sunshine and the same sharp wind, my Lady and Sir Leicester, in their traveling chariot (my Lady's woman, and Sir Leicester's man affectionate in the rumble), start for home. With a considerable amount of jingling and whip-cracking, and many plunging demonstrations on the part of two bare-backed horses, and two Centaurs with glazed hats, jack-boots, and flowing manes and tails, they rattle out of the yard of the Hôtel Bristol in the Place Vendôme, and canter between the sun-and-shadow-checkered colonnade of the Rue de Rivoli and the garden of the ill-fated palace of a headless king and queen, off by the Place of Concord, and the Elysian Fields, and the Gate of the Star, out of Paris.

Through the same cold sunlight and sharp wind, my Lady and Sir Leicester, in their travel carriage (my Lady's maid and Sir Leicester's servant cozy in the back), set off for home. With a fair amount of jingling and crack of the whip, along with the enthusiastic movements of two bare-backed horses, and two drivers in shiny hats, riding boots, and flowing hair, they rattle out of the yard of the Hôtel Bristol in the Place Vendôme, and trot between the sun-and-shadow-patterned columns of the Rue de Rivoli and the garden of the unfortunate palace of a beheaded king and queen, passing by the Place of Concord, the Elysian Fields, and the Gate of the Star, out of Paris.

Sooth to say, they can not go away too fast, for, even here, my Lady Dedlock has been bored to death. Concert, assembly, opera, theatre, drive, nothing is new to my Lady, under the worn-out heavens. Only last Sunday, when poor wretches were gay—within the walls, playing with children among the clipped trees and the statues in the Palace Garden; walking, a score abreast, in in the Elysian Fields, made more Elysian by performing dogs and wooden horses; between whiles filtering (a few) through the gloomy Cathedral of Our Lady, to say a word or two at the base of a pillar, within flare of a rusty little gridiron-full of gusty little tapers—without the walls encompassing Paris with dancing, love-making, wine-drinking, tobacco-smoking, tomb-visiting, billiard card and domino playing, quack-doctoring, and much murderous refuse, animate and inanimate—only last Sunday, my Lady in the desolation of Boredom and the clutch of Giant Despair, almost hated her own maid for being in spirits.

Honestly, they can’t leave fast enough, because even here, Lady Dedlock is completely bored. Concerts, social events, the opera, theater, drives—nothing is fresh for her under the same old sky. Just last Sunday, while the unfortunate were enjoying themselves—inside, playing with kids among the trimmed trees and statues in the Palace Garden; strolling side by side in the Elysian Fields, which felt even more heavenly with performing dogs and wooden horses; and sometimes filtering (a few) through the gloomy Cathedral of Our Lady, to exchange a few words at the base of a pillar, near a flickering rusty little grid with gusty tiny candles—outside, the walls of Paris were full of dancing, romance, drinking, smoking, tomb visits, billiards, card games, dominoes, quack doctors, and a lot of lifeless or deadly distractions. Just last Sunday, in her deep boredom and overwhelming despair, my Lady nearly hated her own maid for being cheerful.

She can not, therefore, go too fast from Paris. Weariness of soul lies before her, as it lies behind—her Ariel has put a girdle of it round the whole earth, and it can not be unclasped—but the imperfect remedy is always to fly, from the last place where it has been experienced. Fling Paris back into the distance, then, exchanging it for endless avenues and cross-avenues of wintry trees! And, when next beheld, let it be some leagues away, with the Gate of the Star a white speck glittering in the sun, and the city a mere mound in a plain: two dark square towers rising out of it, and light and shadow descending on it aslant, like the angels in Jacob's dream!

She cannot, therefore, leave Paris too quickly. The weight of her soul is ahead of her, just as it is behind—her anxiety has wrapped the entire earth in a tight grip, and it can't be loosened—but the imperfect solution is always to escape from the last place it was felt. So, throw Paris back into the distance, swapping it for endless streets and winding roads lined with wintry trees! And, when she sees it next, let it be several miles away, with the Gate of the Star just a white dot shimmering in the sun, and the city barely a hill in a flat landscape: two dark square towers rising from it, and light and shadow falling across it at an angle, like the angels in Jacob's dream!

Sir Leicester is generally in a complacent state, and rarely bored. When he has nothing else to[Pg 173] do, he can always contemplate his own greatness. It is a considerable advantage to a man to have so inexhaustible a subject. After reading his letters, he leans back in his corner of the carriage, and generally reviews his importance to society.

Sir Leicester is usually pretty self-satisfied and hardly ever bored. When he has nothing else to do, he can always think about how great he is. It’s a big advantage for a guy to have such an endless topic to reflect on. After reading his letters, he leans back in his spot in the carriage and typically reviews his significance to society.

"You have an unusual amount of correspondence this morning?" says my Lady, after a long time. She is fatigued with reading. Has almost read a page in twenty miles.

"You have a lot of mail this morning?" my Lady says after a long pause. She's exhausted from reading. She has barely read a page over twenty miles.

"Nothing in it, though. Nothing whatever."

"Nothing in it at all. Nothing at all."

"I saw one of Mr. Tulkinghorn's long effusions, I think?"

"I think I saw one of Mr. Tulkinghorn's lengthy speeches."

"You see every thing," says Sir Leicester, with admiration.

"You see everything," says Sir Leicester, with admiration.

"Ha!" sighs my Lady. "He is the most tiresome of men!"

"Ha!" sighs my lady. "He's the most annoying guy!"

"He sends—I really beg your pardon—he sends," says Sir Leicester, selecting the letter, and unfolding it, "a message to you. Our stopping to change horses, as I came to his postscript, drove it out of my memory. I beg you'll excuse me. He says—" Sir Leicester is so long in taking out his eye-glass and adjusting it, that my Lady looks a little irritated. "He says 'In the matter of the right of way—' I beg your pardon, that's not the place. He says—yes! Here I have it! He says, 'I beg my respectful compliments to my Lady, who, I hope, has benefited by the change. Will you do me the favor to mention (as it may interest her), that I have something to tell her on her return, in reference to the person who copied the affidavit in the Chancery suit, which so powerfully stimulated her curiosity. I have seen him.'"

"He sends—I’m really sorry—he sends," says Sir Leicester, picking up the letter and unfolding it, "a message for you. Our stop to change horses made me forget it as I reached his postscript. I hope you’ll forgive me. He says—" Sir Leicester takes so long to get out his eyeglass and adjust it that my Lady looks a little annoyed. "He says 'Regarding the right of way—' I apologize, that’s not the right part. He says—yes! Here it is! He says, 'I send my respectful regards to my Lady, who I hope has benefited from the change. Would you please do me the favor of mentioning (as it may interest her) that I have something to share with her upon her return about the person who copied the affidavit in the Chancery suit, which piqued her curiosity so much. I have seen him.'"

My Lady, leaning forward, looks out of her window.

My lady, leaning forward, looks out of her window.

"That's the message," observes Sir Leicester.

"That's the message," says Sir Leicester.

"I should like to walk a little," says my Lady, still looking out of her window.

"I'd like to take a little walk," my Lady says, still looking out the window.

"Walk?" repeats Sir Leicester, in a tone of surprise.

"Walk?" Sir Leicester repeats, sounding surprised.

"I should like to walk a little," says my Lady, with unmistakable distinctness. "Please to stop the carriage."

"I'd like to walk a bit," says my Lady, very clearly. "Please stop the carriage."

The carriage is stopped, the affectionate man alights from the rumble, opens the door, and lets down the steps, obedient to an impatient motion of my Lady's hand. My Lady alights so quickly, and walks away so quickly, that Sir Leicester, for all his scrupulous politeness, is unable to assist her, and is left behind. A space of a minute or two has elapsed before he comes up with her. She smiles, looks very handsome, takes his arm, lounges with him for a quarter of a mile, is very much bored, and resumes her seat in the carriage.

The carriage has stopped, and the caring man gets out from the back, opens the door, and lowers the steps, responding to an eager gesture from my Lady's hand. My Lady gets out so quickly and walks away so fast that Sir Leicester, despite his careful manners, can't help her and is left behind. It takes him a minute or two to catch up with her. She smiles, looks quite beautiful, takes his arm, walks with him for about a quarter of a mile, gets really bored, and then goes back to her seat in the carriage.

The rattle and clatter continue through the greater part of three days, with more or less of bell-jingling and whip-cracking, and more or less plunging of Centaurs and bare-backed horses. Their courtly politeness to each other, at the Hotels where they tarry, is the theme of general admiration. Though my Lord is a little aged for my Lady, says Madame, the hostess of the Golden Ape, and though he might be her amiable father,[Pg 174] one can see at a glance that they love each other. One observes my Lord with his white hair, standing, hat in hand, to help my Lady to and from the carriage. One observes my Lady, how recognizant of my Lord's politeness, with an inclination of her gracious head, and the concession of her so-genteel fingers! It is ravishing!

The noise and commotion go on for most of three days, with varying amounts of bell ringing and whip cracking, and some back-and-forth antics involving Centaurs and bareback horses. Their courteous behavior towards each other at the hotels where they stay is the talk of the town. Although my Lord is a bit older than my Lady, as Madame, the hostess of the Golden Ape, points out, and he could easily be her charming father,[Pg 174] you can tell immediately that they’re in love. You notice my Lord with his white hair, standing with his hat in hand, helping my Lady in and out of the carriage. You see how she acknowledges his politeness with a graceful nod of her head and the delicate gesture of her elegantly refined fingers! It’s absolutely delightful!

The sea has no appreciation of great men, but knocks them about like the small fry. It is habitually hard upon Sir Leicester, whose countenance it greenly mottles in the manner of sage-cheese, and in whose aristocratic system it effects a dismal revolution. It is the Radical of Nature to him. Nevertheless, his dignity gets over it, after stopping to refit; and he goes on with my Lady for Chesney Wold, lying only one night in London on the way to Lincolnshire.

The sea doesn’t care about great men; it tosses them around just like everyone else. It regularly makes things tough for Sir Leicester, whose face it colors in a greenish way, like sage cheese, and causes a troubling upheaval in his upper-class life. It’s Nature’s version of a radical for him. Still, he manages to maintain his dignity after taking a moment to regroup, and he continues on with my Lady to Chesney Wold, only spending one night in London on the way to Lincolnshire.

Through the same cold sunlight—colder as the day declines—and through the same sharp wind—sharper as the separate shadows of bare trees gloom together in the woods, and as the Ghost's Walk, touched at the western corner by a pile of fire in the sky, resigns itself to coming night—they drive into the park. The Rooks, swinging in their lofty houses in the elm-tree avenue, seem to discuss the question of the occupancy of the carriage as it passes underneath; some agreeing that Sir Leicester and my Lady are come down; some arguing with malcontents who won't admit it; now, all consenting to consider the question disposed of; now, all breaking out again in violent debate, incited by one obstinate and drowsy bird, who will persist in putting in a last contradictory croak. Leaving them to swing and caw, the traveling chariot rolls on to the house; where fires gleam warmly through some of the windows, though not through so many as to give an inhabited expression to the darkening mass of front. But the brilliant and distinguished circle will soon do that.

Through the same cold sunlight—colder as the day fades—and through the same sharp wind—sharper as the separate shadows of bare trees gather in the woods, and as the Ghost's Walk, touched at the western corner by a flame in the sky, resigns itself to the coming night—they drive into the park. The rooks, swinging in their high nests in the elm-tree avenue, seem to be discussing whether the carriage is occupied as it passes beneath; some agreeing that Sir Leicester and my Lady have arrived; some arguing with dissenters who refuse to accept it; now, all agreeing that the matter is settled; now, all breaking out again in a heated debate, stirred up by one stubborn and drowsy bird, who insists on giving one last contradictory caw. Leaving them to swing and squawk, the traveling carriage rolls on to the house; where fires glow warmly through some of the windows, though not enough to make the darkening facade look inhabited. But the brilliant and distinguished gathering will soon change that.

Mrs. Rouncewell is in attendance, and receives Sir Leicester's customary shake of the hand with a profound courtesy.

Mrs. Rouncewell is present and accepts Sir Leicester's usual handshake with great respect.

"How do you do, Mrs. Rouncewell? I am glad to see you."

"How's it going, Mrs. Rouncewell? I'm happy to see you."

"I hope I have the honor of welcoming you in good health, Sir Leicester?"

"I hope I have the pleasure of welcoming you in good health, Sir Leicester?"

"In excellent health, Mrs. Rouncewell."

"Mrs. Rouncewell is in great health."

"My Lady is looking charmingly well," says Mrs. Rouncewell, with another courtesy.

"My Lady looks absolutely lovely," says Mrs. Rouncewell, with another curtsy.

My Lady signifies, without profuse expenditure of words, that she is as wearily well as she can hope to be.

My lady indicates, without wasting too many words, that she is as tired as she can possibly be.

But Rosa is in the distance, behind the housekeeper; and my Lady, who has not subdued the quickness of her observation, whatever else she may have conquered, asks:

But Rosa is far away, behind the housekeeper; and my Lady, who hasn't dulled her sharp observation skills, no matter what else she might have mastered, asks:

"Who is that girl?"

"Who's that girl?"

"A young scholar of mine, my Lady. Rosa."

"A young scholar of mine, my lady. Rosa."

"Come here, Rosa!" Lady Dedlock beckons her, with even an appearance of interest. "Why, do you know how pretty you are, child?" she says, touching her shoulder with her two forefingers.

"Come here, Rosa!" Lady Dedlock calls to her, showing a hint of interest. "Do you know how pretty you are, sweetie?" she says, lightly touching her shoulder with her two fingertips.

Rosa, very much abashed, says "No, if you[Pg 175] please, my Lady!" and glances up, and glances down, and don't know where to look, but looks all the prettier.

Rosa, feeling quite embarrassed, says, "No, please, my Lady!" and looks up, then looks down, unsure of where to focus, but ends up looking even more attractive.

"How old are you?"

"What's your age?"

"Nineteen, my Lady."

"Nineteen, my lady."

"Nineteen," repeats my Lady, thoughtfully. "Take care they don't spoil you by flattery."

"Nineteen," my Lady repeats, pondering. "Be careful they don't spoil you with flattery."

"Yes, my Lady."

"Yes, my lady."

My Lady taps her dimpled cheek with the same delicate gloved fingers, and goes on to the foot of the oak staircase, where Sir Leicester pauses for her as her knightly escort. A staring old Dedlock in a panel, as large as life and as dull, looks as if he didn't know what to make of it—which was probably his general state of mind in the days of Queen Elizabeth.

My Lady taps her dimpled cheek with her delicate gloved fingers and continues to the bottom of the oak staircase, where Sir Leicester waits for her as her knightly escort. A staring old Dedlock in a panel, as large as life and just as boring, looks like he has no idea what to think of it—which was likely his usual state of mind in the days of Queen Elizabeth.

That evening, in the housekeeper's room, Rosa can do nothing but murmur Lady Dedlock's praises. She is so affable, so graceful, so beautiful, so elegant; has such a sweet voice, and such a thrilling touch, that Rosa can feel it yet! Mrs. Rouncewell confirms all this, not without personal pride, reserving only the one point of affability. Mrs. Rouncewell is not quite sure as to that. Heaven forbid that she should say a syllable in dispraise of any member of that excellent family; above all, of my Lady, whom the whole world admires; but if my Lady would only be "a little more free," not quite so cold and distant, Mrs. Rouncewell thinks she would be more affable.

That evening, in the housekeeper's room, Rosa can only praise Lady Dedlock. She's so friendly, so graceful, so beautiful, so stylish; she has such a sweet voice and such an electrifying touch that Rosa can still feel it! Mrs. Rouncewell agrees with all of this, not without a bit of personal pride, but she does reserve judgment on one point: affability. Mrs. Rouncewell isn’t entirely sure about that. God forbid she says anything negative about any member of that amazing family; especially not about my Lady, whom everyone admires. But Mrs. Rouncewell thinks that if my Lady could just be "a little more approachable," not quite so cold and distant, she would be more welcoming.

"'Tis almost a pity," Mrs. Rouncewell adds—only "almost," because it borders on impiety to suppose that any thing could be better than it is, in such an express dispensation as the Dedlock affairs; "that my Lady has no family. If she had had a daughter now, a grown young lady, to interest her, I think she would have had the only kind of excellence she wants."

"'It's almost a pity,' Mrs. Rouncewell adds—only 'almost,' because it seems a bit disrespectful to think that anything could be better than it is in the specific situation of the Dedlock affairs; 'that my Lady has no family. If she had a daughter now, a grown young lady, to engage her, I believe she would have had the only kind of excellence she desires.'"

"Might not that have made her still more proud, grandmother?" says Watt; who has been home and come back again, he is such a good grandson.

"Might that have made her even prouder, Grandma?" says Watt, who has gone home and returned again; he's such a good grandson.

"More and most, my dear," returns the housekeeper with dignity, "are words it's not my place to use—nor so much as to hear—applied to any drawback on my Lady."

"More and most, my dear," replies the housekeeper with dignity, "are words it's not my place to use—or even to hear—when it comes to any fault of my Lady."

"I beg your pardon, grandmother. But she is proud, is she not?"

"I apologize, Grandma. But she's proud, right?"

"If she is, she has reason to be. The Dedlock family have always reason to be."

"If she is, she has every reason to be. The Dedlock family always has reasons to be."

"Well," says Watt, "it's to be hoped they line out of their Prayer-Books a certain passage for the common people about pride and vain-glory. Forgive me, grandmother! Only a joke!"

"Well," says Watt, "let's hope they take a certain passage about pride and vanity out of their Prayer Books for the common folk. Forgive me, grandma! Just kidding!"

"Sir Leicester and Lady Dedlock, my dear, are not fit subjects for joking."

"Sir Leicester and Lady Dedlock, my dear, are not suitable subjects for jokes."

"Sir Leicester is no joke, by any means," says Watt; "and I humbly ask his pardon. I suppose, grandmother, that, even with the family and their guests down here, there is no objection to my prolonging my stay at the Dedlock Arms for a day or two, as any other traveler might?"

"Sir Leicester is seriously no joke," says Watt; "and I sincerely apologize to him. I guess, grandmother, that even with the family and their guests here, there’s no issue with me extending my stay at the Dedlock Arms for a day or two, like any other traveler would?"

"Surely, none in the world, child."

"Surely, no one in the world, kid."

"I am glad of that," says Watt, "because I—because[Pg 176] I have an inexpressible desire to extend my knowledge of this beautiful neighborhood."

"I’m glad to hear that," says Watt, "because I—because[Pg 176] I have this deep desire to learn more about this beautiful area."

He happens to glance at Rosa, who looks down, and is very shy, indeed. But, according to the old superstition, it should be Rosa's ears that burn, and not her fresh bright cheeks; for my Lady's maid is holding forth about her at this moment, with surpassing energy.

He happens to look at Rosa, who is looking down and seems really shy. But, according to the old superstition, it should be Rosa's ears that are burning, not her fresh, bright cheeks; because my lady's maid is talking about her right now with a lot of energy.

My Lady's maid is a Frenchwoman of two-and-thirty, from somewhere in the Southern country about Avignon and Marseilles—a large-eyed, brown woman with black hair; who would be handsome, but for a certain feline mouth, and general uncomfortable tightness of face, rendering the jaws too eager, and the skull too prominent. There is something indefinably keen and wan about her anatomy; and she has a watchful way of looking out of the corners of her eyes without turning her head, which could be pleasantly dispensed with—especially when she is in an ill-humor and near knives. Through all the good taste of her dress and little adornments, these objections so express themselves, that she seems to go about like a very neat She-Wolf imperfectly tamed. Besides being accomplished in all the knowledge appertaining to her post, she is almost an Englishwoman in her acquaintance with the language—consequently, she is in no want of words to shower upon Rosa for having attracted my Lady's attention; and she pours them out with such grim ridicule as she sits at dinner, that her companion, the affectionate man, is rather relieved when she arrives at the spoon stage of that performance.

My lady's maid is a thirty-two-year-old Frenchwoman from somewhere in the South near Avignon and Marseilles. She’s a large-eyed, brown woman with black hair; she could be beautiful if it weren’t for her somewhat cat-like mouth and a generally tense expression that makes her jawlines look too eager and her skull too prominent. There's something vaguely sharp and pale about her features, and she has a watchful way of glancing out of the corners of her eyes without turning her head, which can be quite unsettling—especially when she’s in a bad mood and near sharp objects. Despite her good taste in clothing and accessories, these flaws are so evident that she seems to move around like a neatly kept but partially tamed she-wolf. Besides being skilled in everything related to her job, she’s almost English in her grasp of the language—so she has plenty of words to throw at Rosa for catching my lady's attention; she delivers them with such harsh mockery during dinner that her companion, the affectionate man, feels a bit relieved when she finally switches to using a spoon.

Ha, ha, ha! She, Hortense, been in my Lady's service since five years, and always kept at the distance, and this doll, this puppet, caressed—absolutely caressed—by my Lady on the moment of her arriving at the house! Ha! ha! ha! "And do you know how pretty you are, child?"—"No, my Lady."—You are right there! "And how old are you, child? And take care they do not spoil you by flattery, child!" O how droll! It is the best thing altogether.

Ha, ha, ha! She, Hortense, has been working for my Lady for five years, always kept at a distance, and this doll, this puppet, was actually pampered—totally pampered—by my Lady the moment she arrived at the house! Ha! ha! ha! "And do you know how pretty you are, sweetheart?"—"No, my Lady."—You're totally right about that! "And how old are you, sweetheart? And be careful they don’t spoil you with compliments, sweetheart!" Oh, how funny! It's the best thing ever.

In short, it is such an admirable thing, that Mademoiselle Hortense can't forget it; but at meals for days afterward, even among her countrywomen and others attached in like capacity to the troop of visitors, relapses into silent enjoyment of the joke—an enjoyment expressed in her own convivial manner, by an additional tightness of face, thin elongation of compressed lips, and sidewise look: which intense appreciation of humor is frequently reflected in my Lady's mirrors, when my Lady is not among them.

In short, it's such a remarkable thing that Mademoiselle Hortense can't stop thinking about it; but at meals for days afterward, even with her fellow countrywomen and others connected in the same way to the group of visitors, she slips back into quietly enjoying the joke—an enjoyment shown in her own cheerful way, by a tighter expression on her face, a thin stretch of her pressed lips, and a sideways glance: this intense appreciation of humor is often mirrored in my Lady's reflections when my Lady isn't present.

All the mirrors in the house are brought into action now: many of them after a long blank. They reflect handsome faces, simpering faces, youthful faces, faces of threescore-and-ten that will not submit to be old; the entire collection of faces that have come to pass a January week or two at Chesney Wold, and which the fashionable intelligence, a mighty hunter before the Lord, hunts with a keen scent, from their breaking[Pg 177] cover at the Court of St. James's to their being run down to Death. The place in Lincolnshire is all alive. By day guns and voices are heard ringing in the woods, horsemen and carriages enliven the park-roads, servants and hangers-on pervade the Village and the Dedlock Arms. Seen by night, from distant openings in the trees, the row of windows in the long drawing-room, where my Lady's picture hangs over the great chimney-piece, is like a row of jewels set in a black frame. On Sunday, the chill little church is almost warmed by so much gallant company, and the general flavor of the Dedlock dust is quenched in delicate perfumes.

All the mirrors in the house are now in use: many of them after a long period of nothing. They reflect attractive faces, flirtatious faces, youthful faces, and faces that are seventy years old but refuse to accept old age; the whole assortment of faces that have come to spend a week or two in January at Chesney Wold, which the fashionable elite, a powerful hunter before the Lord, tracks with a sharp nose, from their first appearance at the Court of St. James's to their inevitable downfall. The place in Lincolnshire is buzzing with life. By day, gunshots and voices echo in the woods, riders and carriages brighten the park roads, and servants and hangers-on fill the Village and the Dedlock Arms. At night, seen through distant gaps in the trees, the row of windows in the long drawing-room, where my Lady's portrait hangs above the grand fireplace, looks like a line of jewels set in a dark frame. On Sunday, the chilly little church is almost warmed by so much elegant company, and the usual scent of the Dedlock dust is masked by delicate perfumes.

The brilliant and distinguished circle comprehends within it, no contracted amount of education, sense, courage, honor, beauty, and virtue. Yet there is something a little wrong about it, in despite of its immense advantages. What can it be?

The brilliant and distinguished circle includes a vast amount of education, sense, courage, honor, beauty, and virtue. Yet, despite its immense benefits, something feels slightly off about it. What could it be?

Dandyism? There is no King George the Fourth now (more's the pity!) to set the dandy fashion; there are no clear-starched jack-towel neckcloths, no short-waisted coats, no false calves, no stays. There are no caricatures, now, of effeminite Exquisites so arrayed, swooning in opera boxes with excess of delight, and being revived by other dainty creatures, poking long-necked scent-bottles at their noses. There is no beau whom it takes four men at once to shake into his buckskins, or who goes to see all the Executions, or who is troubled with the self-reproach of having once consumed a pea. But is there Dandyism in the brilliant and distinguished circle notwithstanding, Dandyism of a more mischievous sort, that has got below the surface and is doing less harmless things than jack-toweling itself and stopping its own digestion, to which no rational person need particularly object!

Dandyism? There's no King George the Fourth anymore (which is a shame!) to define the dandy style; there are no starched neckties, no short jackets, no fake legs, no corsets. There are no caricatures now of effeminate Exquisites all dressed up, swooning in opera boxes with overwhelming joy, being revived by other delicate beings who are holding long-necked perfume bottles to their noses. There’s no dandy that requires four men to help him into his tight pants, or who attends all the public executions, or who feels guilty for once eating a pea. But is there still Dandyism in the vibrant and elite circle? A more mischievous kind of Dandyism that has gone beneath the surface and is engaging in less innocent activities than just dressing up and hindering digestion, which no sensible person should particularly mind!

Why, yes. It can not be disguised. There are at Chesney Wold this January week, some ladies and gentlemen of the newest fashion, who have set up a Dandyism—in Religion, for instance. Who, in mere lackadaisical want of an emotion, have agreed upon a little dandy talk about the Vulgar wanting faith in things in general; meaning, in the things that have been tried and found wanting, as though a low fellow should unaccountably lose faith in a bad shilling, after finding it out! Who would make the Vulgar very picturesque and faithful, by putting back the hands upon the Clock of Time, and canceling a few hundred years of history.

Sure, it can’t be hidden. There are at Chesney Wold this January week, some ladies and gentlemen of the latest trend, who have established a new form of dandyism—in religion, for example. Who, in their lazy desire for an emotion, have come up with some trivial chatter about the common people wanting faith in things in general; meaning, in the things that have been tested and found lacking, as if a lowly person should suddenly lose trust in a worthless coin after discovering its flaws! Who would make the common people very charming and trustworthy, by rewinding the hands on the Clock of Time, and erasing a few hundred years of history.

There are also ladies and gentlemen of another fashion, not so new, but very elegant, who have agreed to put a smooth glaze on the world, and to keep down all its relations. For whom every thing must be languid and pretty. Who have found out the perpetual stoppage. Who are to rejoice at nothing, and be sorry for nothing. Who are not to be disturbed by ideas. On whom even the Fine Arts, attending in powder and walking backward like the Lord Chamberlain, must array themselves in the milliners' and tailors' patterns of past generations, and be particularly[Pg 178] careful not to be in earnest, or to receive any impress from the moving age.

There are also sophisticated ladies and gentlemen, not entirely new but still very stylish, who’ve decided to smooth over the world and keep everything under control. For them, everything needs to be soft and beautiful. They’ve discovered a constant pause on life. They are meant to celebrate nothing and regret nothing. They shouldn’t be bothered by new ideas. Even the Fine Arts, appearing in makeup and moving backward like the Lord Chamberlain, have to dress according to the fashion trends of past generations and be especially careful not to take anything seriously or be affected by the changing times.

Then there is my Lord Boodle, of considerable reputation with his party, who has known what office is, and who tells Sir Leicester Dedlock with much gravity, after dinner, that he really does not see to what the present age is tending. A debate is not what a debate used to be; the House is not what the House used to be; even a Cabinet is not what it formerly was. He perceives with astonishment, that supposing the present Government to be overthrown, the limited choice of the Crown, in the formation of a new Ministry, would lie between Lord Coddle and Sir Thomas Doodle—supposing it to be impossible for the Duke of Foodle to act with Goodle, which may be assumed to be the case in consequence of the breach arising out of that affair with Hoodle. Then, giving the Home Department and the Leadership of the House of Commons to Joodle, the Exchequer to Koodle, the Colonies to Loodle, and the Foreign Office to Moodle, what are you to do with Noodle? You can't offer him the Presidency of the Council; that is reserved for Poodle. You can't put him in the Woods and Forests; that is hardly good enough for Quoodle. What follows? That the country is shipwrecked, lost, and gone to pieces (as is made manifest to the patriotism of Sir Leicester Dedlock), because you can't provide for Noodle!

Then there’s Lord Boodle, who’s pretty well-known in his party and has been around the block when it comes to politics. After dinner, he seriously tells Sir Leicester Dedlock that he really doesn't understand where this age is headed. A debate isn’t what it used to be; the House isn’t what it used to be; even a Cabinet has changed. He’s astonished to realize that if the current Government were to fall, the limited choices for the Crown in forming a new Ministry would be between Lord Coddle and Sir Thomas Doodle—assuming the Duke of Foodle can’t team up with Goodle, which seems likely due to the fallout from that situation with Hoodle. Next, if you give the Home Department and the Leadership of the House of Commons to Joodle, the Exchequer to Koodle, the Colonies to Loodle, and the Foreign Office to Moodle, what do you do with Noodle? You can’t offer him the Presidency of the Council; that’s reserved for Poodle. You can’t stick him in the Woods and Forests; that’s not even good enough for Quoodle. So, what does that mean? The country is a wreck, lost, and falling apart (as Sir Leicester Dedlock’s patriotism makes clear), all because you can’t find a place for Noodle!

On the other hand, the Right Honorable William Buffy, M.P., contends across the table with some one else, that the shipwreck of the country—about which there is no doubt; it is only the manner of it that is in question—is attributable to Cuffy. If you had done with Cuffy what you ought to have done when he first came into Parliament, and had prevented him from going over to Duffy, you would have got him into an alliance with Fuffy, you would have had with you the weight attaching as a smart debater to Guffy, you would have brought to bear upon the elections the wealth of Huffy, you would have got in for three counties Juffy, Kuffy, and Luffy; and you would have strengthened your administration by the official knowledge and the business habits of Muffy. All this, instead of being, as you now are, dependent on the mere caprice of Puffy!

On the other hand, the Right Honorable William Buffy, M.P., argues across the table with someone else that the country's shipwreck—there's no doubt about it; it's just the way it happened that’s in question—is due to Cuffy. If you had handled Cuffy like you should have when he first entered Parliament and stopped him from teaming up with Duffy, you could have aligned him with Fuffy, you would have gained the advantage of Guffy’s skills as a sharp debater, you would have tapped into Huffy’s wealth for the elections, and you could have secured seats in three counties: Juffy, Kuffy, and Luffy. You would have strengthened your administration with Muffy’s official knowledge and business skills. Instead, you’re now left at the mercy of Puffy’s whims!

As to this point, and as to some minor topics, there are differences of opinion; but it is perfectly clear to the brilliant and distinguished circle, all round, that nobody is in question but Boodle and his retinue, and Buffy and his retinue. These are the great actors for whom the stage is reserved. A People there are, no doubt—a certain large number of supernumeraries, who are to be occasionally addressed, and relied upon for shouts and choruses, as on the theatrical stage; but Boodle and Buffy, their followers and families, their heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, are the born first-actors, managers, and leaders, and no others can appear upon the scene for ever and ever.

As for this point and some minor topics, people have different opinions; but it’s obvious to the smart and distinguished group that the only ones who matter are Boodle and his crew, and Buffy and his. These are the main players for whom the stage is reserved. There are definitely other folks—a large number of extras—who will occasionally be addressed and relied on for cheers and choruses, like in a theater; but Boodle and Buffy, along with their followers and families, their heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, are the natural lead actors, directors, and leaders, and no one else will take the stage forever.

In this, too, there is perhaps more dandyism at Chesney Wold than the brilliant and distinguished circle will find good for itself in the long run. For it is, even with the stillest and politest circles, as with the circle the necromancer draws around him—very strange appearances may be seen in active motion outside. With this difference; that, being realities and not phantoms, there is the greater danger of their breaking in.

In this, there might be more showiness at Chesney Wold than what the impressive and respected group will find beneficial in the long run. Because even in the quietest and most polite circles, just like the circle the magician conjures around him, very unusual sights may be seen moving outside. The difference is that, since they are real and not illusions, there’s a greater risk of them intruding.

Chesney Wold is quite full, any how; so full, that a burning sense of injury arises in the breasts of ill-lodged ladies' maids, and is not to be extinguished. Only one room is empty. It is a turret chamber of the third order of merit, plainly but comfortably furnished, and having an old-fashioned business air. It is Mr. Tulkinghorn's room, and is never bestowed on any body else, for he may come at any time. He is not come yet. It is his quiet habit to walk across the park from the village, in fine weather; to drop into this room, as if he had never been out of it since he was last seen there; to request a servant to inform Sir Leicester that he is arrived, in case he should be wanted; and to appear ten minutes before dinner, in the shadow of the library door. He sleeps in his turret, with a complaining flag-staff over his head; and has some leads outside, on which, any fine morning when he is down here, his black figure may be seen walking before breakfast like a larger species of rook.

Chesney Wold is pretty full, anyway; so full that a deep sense of frustration rises in the hearts of poorly accommodated ladies' maids and just won't go away. Only one room is empty. It's a turret room of the third order of merit, simply but comfortably furnished, with an old-fashioned work vibe. This is Mr. Tulkinghorn's room, and it's never given to anyone else because he might show up at any time. He hasn't arrived yet. It's his usual practice to stroll across the park from the village when the weather is nice, to drop into this room as if he never left since the last time he was there, to ask a servant to let Sir Leicester know he has arrived in case he's needed, and to show up ten minutes before dinner, lingering in the shadow of the library door. He sleeps in his turret, with a creaky flagpole overhead, and has some leads outside where, on any nice morning when he's down here, you might see his dark figure walking before breakfast like a larger kind of crow.

Every day before dinner, my Lady looks for him in the dusk of the library, but he is not there. Every day at dinner, my Lady glances down the table for the vacant place, that would be waiting to receive him if he had just arrived; but there is no vacant place. Every night, my Lady casually asks her maid:

Every day before dinner, my lady looks for him in the dim light of the library, but he isn't there. Every day at dinner, my lady looks down the table for the empty seat that would be ready for him if he had just shown up; but there is no empty seat. Every night, my lady casually asks her maid:

"Is Mr. Tulkinghorn come?"

"Is Mr. Tulkinghorn here?"

Every night the answer is: "No my Lady, not yet."

Every night the answer is: "No, my Lady, not yet."

One night, while having her hair undressed, my Lady loses herself in deep thought after this reply, until she sees her own brooding face in the opposite glass, and a pair of black eyes curiously observing her.

One night, while getting her hair done, my Lady becomes lost in deep thought after this reply, until she catches sight of her own pensive face in the mirror across from her, along with a pair of black eyes watching her intently.

"Be so good as to attend," says my Lady then, addressing the reflection of Hortense, "to your business. You can contemplate your beauty at another time."

"Please pay attention," says my Lady, then, looking at Hortense's reflection, "focus on your work. You can admire your beauty another time."

"Pardon! It was your Ladyship's beauty."

"Pardon! It was your beauty, my lady."

"That," says my Lady, "you needn't contemplate at all."

"That," my Lady says, "you don't need to think about at all."

At length, one afternoon a little before sunset, when the bright groups of figures, which have for the last hour or two enlivened the Ghost's Walk, are all dispersed, and only Sir Leicester and my Lady remain upon the terrace, Mr. Tulkinghorn appears. He comes toward them at his usual methodical pace, which is never quickened, never slackened. He wears his usual expressionless mask—if it be a mask—and carries family secrets in every limb of his body, and every crease of his dress. Whether his whole soul is devoted to the great, or whether he yields them nothing beyond the services he sells, is his[Pg 180] personal secret. He keeps it, as he keeps the secrets of his clients; he is his own client in that matter, and will never betray himself.

At last, one afternoon just before sunset, when the lively groups of people that had brightened up the Ghost's Walk for the past hour or two have all scattered, only Sir Leicester and my Lady are left on the terrace when Mr. Tulkinghorn shows up. He walks toward them at his usual steady pace, never speeding up or slowing down. He has his usual expressionless demeanor—if it can even be called that—and carries the weight of family secrets in every part of his being and every wrinkle of his clothes. Whether he is fully devoted to the elite or if he offers them nothing more than the services he provides is his[Pg 180]personal secret. He guards it just like he protects his clients' secrets; he is his own client in that respect and will never reveal himself.

"How do you do, Mr. Tulkinghorn?" says Sir Leicester, giving him his hand.

"How's it going, Mr. Tulkinghorn?" says Sir Leicester, shaking his hand.

Mr. Tulkinghorn is quite well. Sir Leicester is quite well. My Lady is quite well. All highly satisfactory. The lawyer, with his hands behind him, walks, at Sir Leicester's side, along the terrace. My Lady walks upon the other side.

Mr. Tulkinghorn is doing well. Sir Leicester is doing well. My Lady is doing well. Everything is just fine. The lawyer, with his hands behind his back, walks beside Sir Leicester along the terrace. My Lady walks on the other side.

"We expected you before," says Sir Leicester. A gracious observation. As much as to say, "Mr. Tulkinghorn, we remember your existence when you are not here to remind us of it by your presence. We bestow a fragment of our minds upon you, sir, you see!"

"We were expecting you earlier," says Sir Leicester. A polite remark. As if to say, "Mr. Tulkinghorn, we acknowledge that you exist even when you're not here to remind us of it with your presence. We give you a piece of our attention, you see!"

Mr. Tulkinghorn, comprehending it, inclines his head, and says he is much obliged.

Mr. Tulkinghorn, understanding it, nods his head and says he really appreciates it.

"I should have come down sooner," he explains, "but that I have been much engaged with those matters in the several suits between yourself and Boythorn."

"I should have come down sooner," he explains, "but I've been really busy with the various issues in the lawsuits between you and Boythorn."

"A man of a very ill-regulated mind," observes Sir Leicester, with severity. "An extremely dangerous person in any community. A man of a very low character of mind."

"A man with a poorly regulated mind," observes Sir Leicester, sternly. "An extremely dangerous person in any community. A man of very low character."

"He is obstinate," says Mr. Tulkinghorn.

"He is stubborn," says Mr. Tulkinghorn.

"It is natural to such a man to be so," says Sir Leicester, looking most profoundly obstinate himself. "I am not at all surprised to hear it."

"It’s totally normal for a guy like that to act this way," says Sir Leicester, looking very stubborn himself. "I’m not at all shocked to hear it."

"The only question is," pursues the lawyer, "whether you will give up anything."

"The only question is," the lawyer presses, "if you're willing to give up anything."

"No, sir," replies Sir Leicester. "Nothing. I give up?"

"No, sir," replies Sir Leicester. "Nothing. I give up?"

"I don't mean any thing of importance; that, of course, I know you would not abandon. I mean any minor point."

"I don't mean anything significant; that, of course, I know you wouldn't overlook. I'm talking about a minor point."

"Mr. Tulkinghorn," returns Sir Leicester, "there can be no minor point between myself and Mr. Boythorn. If I go farther, and observe that I can not readily conceive how any right of mine can be a minor point, I speak not so much in reference to myself as an individual, as in reference to the family position I have it in charge to maintain."

"Mr. Tulkinghorn," Sir Leicester replies, "there can't be any small issue between me and Mr. Boythorn. If I may add that I really can't understand how any right of mine could be considered a small issue, I’m not just talking about myself as a person, but about the family status I’m responsible for upholding."

Mr. Tulkinghorn inclines his head again. "I have now my instructions," he says. "Mr. Boythorn will give us a good deal of trouble—"

Mr. Tulkinghorn nods his head again. "I now have my instructions," he says. "Mr. Boythorn is going to give us quite a bit of trouble—"

"It is the character of such a mind, Mr. Tulkinghorn," Sir Leicester interrupts him, "to give trouble. An exceedingly ill-conditioned, leveling person. A person who, fifty years ago, would probably have been tried at the Old Bailey for some demagogue proceeding, and severely punished—if not," adds Sir Leicester, after a moment's pause, "if not hanged, drawn, and quartered."

"It’s typical of that kind of mindset, Mr. Tulkinghorn," Sir Leicester interrupts him, "to cause trouble. An incredibly difficult, equalizing person. Someone who, fifty years ago, would likely have been tried at the Old Bailey for some demagogic act and severely punished—if not," adds Sir Leicester after a brief pause, "if not hanged, drawn, and quartered."

Sir Leicester appears to discharge his stately breast of a burden, in passing this capital sentence; as if it were the next satisfactory thing to having the sentence executed.

Sir Leicester seems to relieve his noble chest of a weight by issuing this important sentence; as if it were the next best thing to having the sentence carried out.

"But night is coming on," says he, "and my Lady will take cold. My dear, let us go in."

"But night is falling," he says, "and my lady will get cold. My dear, let’s go inside."

As they turned toward the hall-door, Lady[Pg 181] Dedlock addresses Mr. Tulkinghorn for the first time.

As they turned toward the hall door, Lady[Pg 181] Dedlock speaks to Mr. Tulkinghorn for the first time.

"You sent me a message respecting the person whose writing I happened to inquire about. It was like you to remember the circumstance; I had quite forgotten it. Your message reminded me of it again. I can't imagine what association I had with a hand like that; but I surely had some."

"You sent me a message about the person whose writing I asked about. It was so typical of you to recall that detail; I had completely forgotten. Your message jogged my memory. I can't figure out what connection I had with someone like that, but I definitely had one."

"You had some?" Mr. Tulkinghorn repeats.

"You had some?" Mr. Tulkinghorn asks again.

"Oh, yes!" returns my Lady, carelessly. "I think I must have had some. And did you really take the trouble to find out the writer of that actual thing—what is it!—Affidavit?"

"Oh, yes!" my Lady replies nonchalantly. "I think I must have had some. And did you really bother to find out who wrote that thing—what is it!—Affidavit?"

"Yes."

Yes.

"How very odd!"

"How strange!"

They pass into a sombre breakfast-room on the ground-floor, lighted in the day by two deep windows. It is now twilight. The fire glows brightly on the paneled wall, and palely on the window-glass, where, through the cold reflection of the blaze, the colder landscape shudders in the wind, and a gray mist creeps along: the only traveler besides the waste of clouds.

They walk into a gloomy breakfast room on the ground floor, which is brightened during the day by two deep windows. It’s now twilight. The fire flickers brightly on the paneled wall and softly on the window glass, where, through the cold reflection of the flames, the colder landscape shakes in the wind, and a gray mist creeps along: the only traveler besides the empty sky.

My Lady lounges in a great chair in the chimney-corner, and Sir Leicester takes another great chair opposite. The lawyer stands before the fire, with his hand out at arm's length, shading his face. He looks across his arm at my Lady.

My lady relaxes in a large chair by the fireplace, while Sir Leicester sits in another large chair across from her. The lawyer stands before the fire, holding his hand out at arm's length to shield his face. He glances over his arm at my lady.

"Yes," he says, "I inquired about the man, and found him. And, what is very strange, I found him—"

"Yeah," he says, "I asked about the guy, and I found him. And, interestingly enough, I found him—"

"Not to be any out-of-the-way person, I am afraid!" Lady Dedlock languidly anticipates.

"Not to be any kind of oddball, I hope!" Lady Dedlock says with a hint of boredom.

"I found him dead."

"I found him deceased."

"Oh, dear me!" remonstrated Sir Leicester. Not so much shocked by the fact, as by the fact of the fact being mentioned.

"Oh, my goodness!" protested Sir Leicester. Not so much upset by the fact itself, but more by the fact that it was brought up.

"I was directed to his lodging—a miserable, poverty-stricken place—and I found him dead."

"I was taken to his place—a sad, impoverished spot—and I found him dead."

"You will excuse me, Mr. Tulkinghorn," observes Sir Leicester. "I think the less said—"

"You'll excuse me, Mr. Tulkinghorn," says Sir Leicester. "I think it's better not to say much—"

"Pray, Sir Leicester, let me hear the story out;" (it is my Lady speaking.) "It is quite a story for twilight. How very shocking! Dead?"

"Please, Sir Leicester, let me hear the whole story;" (it's my Lady speaking.) "It's quite a tale for twilight. How shocking! Dead?"

Mr. Tulkinghorn re-asserts it by another inclination of his head. "Whether by his own hand—"

Mr. Tulkinghorn nods again to emphasize his point. "Whether it was his own doing—"

"Upon my honor!" cries Sir Leicester. "Really!"

"On my honor!" exclaims Sir Leicester. "Seriously!"

"Do let me hear the story!" says my Lady.

"Please tell me the story!" says my Lady.

"Whatever you desire, my dear. But, I must say—"

"Whatever you want, my dear. But I have to say—"

"No, you mustn't say! Go on, Mr. Tulkinghorn."

"No, you can't say that! Go ahead, Mr. Tulkinghorn."

Sir Leicester's gallantry concedes the point; though he still feels that to bring this sort of squalor among the upper classes is really—really—

Sir Leicester's bravery admits the point; though he still thinks that bringing this kind of squalor into the upper classes is really—really—

"I was about to say," resumes the lawyer, with undisturbed calmness, "that whether he had died by his own hand or not, it was beyond my power to tell you. I should amend that phrase, however, by saying that he had unquestionably died of his own act; though whether by[Pg 182] his own deliberate intention, or by mischance, can never certainly be known. The coroner's jury found that he took the poison accidentally."

"I was just about to say," continues the lawyer, remaining completely calm, "that whether he died by his own hand or not, I can't say for sure. I should change that to say that he definitely died by his own actions; however, we can never be certain if it was by his own intention or by accident. The coroner's jury concluded that he took the poison accidentally."

"And what kind of man," my Lady asks, "was this deplorable creature?"

"And what kind of man," my Lady asks, "was this unfortunate creature?"

"Very difficult to say," returns the lawyer, shaking his head. "He had lived so wretchedly, and was so neglected, with his gipsy color, and his wild black hair and beard, that I should have considered him the commonest of the common. The surgeon had a notion that he had once been something better, both in appearance and condition."

"That's really hard to say," the lawyer replies, shaking his head. "He lived such a miserable life and was so overlooked, with his tanned skin and his wild black hair and beard, that I would have thought he was the most ordinary person around. The surgeon thought he might have once been someone of higher status, both in looks and situation."

"What did they call the wretched being?"

"What did they call the miserable person?"

"They called him what he had called himself, but no one knew his name."

"They called him what he had called himself, but no one knew his name."

"Not even any one who had attended on him?"

"Not even anyone who had been around him?"

"No one had attended on him. He was found dead. In fact, I found him."

"No one had taken care of him. He was found dead. Actually, I found him."

"Without any clew to any thing more?"

"Without any clue to anything more?"

"Without any; there was," says the lawyer, meditatively, "an old portmanteau; but—No, there were no papers."

"Without any, there was," says the lawyer, thoughtfully, "an old suitcase; but—No, there were no documents."

During the utterance of every word of this short dialogue, Lady Dedlock and Mr. Tulkinghorn, without any other alteration in their customary deportment, have looked very steadily at one another—as was natural, perhaps, in the discussion of so unusual a subject. Sir Leicester has looked at the fire, with the general expression of the Dedlock on the staircase. The story being told, he renews his stately protest, saying, that as it is quite clear that no association in my Lady's mind can possibly be traceable to this poor wretch (unless he was a begging-letter writer), he trusts to hear no more about a subject so far removed from my Lady's station.

During the entire exchange of this brief dialogue, Lady Dedlock and Mr. Tulkinghorn, without changing their usual demeanor, have been staring intently at each other—probably a natural reaction given the unusual topic. Sir Leicester has been gazing at the fire, wearing the same expression as the Dedlocks on the staircase. As the story unfolds, he resumes his formal objections, stating that since it's clear there can be no connection in my Lady's mind to this unfortunate person (unless he was a writer of begging letters), he hopes to hear no more about a subject so far removed from my Lady's status.

"Certainly, a collection of horrors," says my Lady, gathering up her mantles and furs; "but they interest one for the moment! Have the kindness, Mr. Tulkinghorn, to open the door for me."

"Definitely a collection of horrors," my lady says, as she gathers her coats and furs. "But they are interesting for the moment! Please, Mr. Tulkinghorn, can you open the door for me?"

Mr. Tulkinghorn does so with deference, and holds it open while she passes out. She passes close to him, with her usual fatigued manner, and insolent grace. They meet again at dinner—again, next day—again, for many days in succession. Lady Dedlock is always the same exhausted deity, surrounded by worshipers, and terribly liable to be bored to death, even while presiding at her own shrine. Mr. Tulkinghorn is always the same speechless repository of noble confidences: so oddly out of place, and yet so perfectly at home. They appear to take as little note of one another, as any two people, inclosed within the same walls, could. But, whether each evermore watches and suspects the other, evermore mistrustful of some great reservation; whether each is evermore prepared at all points for the other, and never to be taken unawares; what each would give to know how much the other knows—all this is hidden, for the time, in their own hearts.

Mr. Tulkinghorn does this politely and holds the door open while she walks out. She brushes past him with her usual tired demeanor and a touch of arrogance. They see each other again at dinner—again the next day—again for many days after that. Lady Dedlock is always the same worn-out goddess, surrounded by admirers, and at risk of being bored to tears, even while at her own altar. Mr. Tulkinghorn remains the same silent keeper of noble secrets: so strangely out of place, yet completely at ease. They seem to pay as little attention to each other as two people can while enclosed within the same walls. But whether they each constantly watch and suspect the other, always distrustful of some hidden agenda; whether they are ever ready for the other and never caught off guard; what each would give to know how much the other knows—all this is kept hidden for now in their own hearts.


CHAPTER XIII.—Esther's Story.

We held many consultations about what Richard was to be; first, without Mr. Jarndyce, as[Pg 183] he had requested, and afterward with him; but it was a long time before we seemed to make progress. Richard said he was ready for any thing. When Mr. Jarndyce doubted whether he might not already be too old to enter the Navy, Richard said he had thought of that, and perhaps he was. When Mr. Jarndyce asked him what he thought of the Army, Richard said he had thought of that, too, and it wasn't a bad idea. When Mr. Jarndyce advised him to try and decide within himself, whether his old preference for the sea was an ordinary boyish inclination, or a strong impulse, Richard answered, Well, he really had tried very often, and he couldn't make out.

We had a lot of discussions about what Richard should do; first, without Mr. Jarndyce, as[Pg 183] he had asked, and then with him; but it took a long time before we seemed to make any progress. Richard said he was open to anything. When Mr. Jarndyce questioned whether he might already be too old to join the Navy, Richard admitted he had thought about that, and maybe he was. When Mr. Jarndyce asked him what he thought about the Army, Richard said he had considered that too, and it wasn't a bad idea. When Mr. Jarndyce suggested he try to determine whether his old preference for the sea was just a typical youthful desire or a genuine calling, Richard replied that he really had tried many times, but he just couldn't figure it out.

"How much of this indecision of character," Mr. Jarndyce said to me, "is chargeable on that incomprehensible heap of uncertainty and procrastination on which he has been thrown from his birth, I don't pretend to say; but that Chancery, among its other sins, is responsible for some of it, I can plainly see. It has engendered or confirmed in him a habit of putting off—and trusting to this, that, and the other chance, without knowing what chance—and dismissing every thing as unsettled, uncertain, and confused. The character of much older and steadier people may be even changed by the circumstances surrounding them. It would be too much to expect that a boy's, in its formation, should be the subject of such influences, and escape them."

"How much of this indecision in character," Mr. Jarndyce said to me, "can be attributed to the confusing mess of uncertainty and delay that he has been thrown into since birth, I can't say for sure; but I can clearly see that Chancery, among its other faults, is partly to blame. It has created or reinforced in him a habit of procrastination—relying on this chance or that chance, without even knowing what those chances are—and dismissing everything as unsettled, uncertain, and confusing. The character of much older and more stable people can be changed by the circumstances around them. It would be unrealistic to expect that a boy’s character, in its development, wouldn’t be influenced by such factors and come out unscathed."

I felt this to be true; though, if I may venture to mention what I thought besides, I thought it much to be regretted that Richard's education had not counteracted those influences, or directed his character. He had been eight years at a public school, and had learnt, I understood, to make Latin Verses of several sorts, in the most admirable manner. But I never heard that it had been any body's business to find out what his natural bent was, or where his failings lay, or to adapt any kind of knowledge to him. He had been adapted to the Verses, and had learnt the art of making them to such perfection, that if he had remained at school until he was of age, I suppose he could only have gone on making them over and over again, unless he had enlarged his education by forgetting how to do it. Still, although I had no doubt that they were very beautiful, and very improving, and very sufficient for a great many purposes of life, and always remembered all through life, I did doubt whether Richard would not have profited by some one studying him a little, instead of his studying them quite so much.

I felt this was true; however, if I can add what I think, I believe it's unfortunate that Richard's education didn't counteract those influences or shape his character. He spent eight years at a public school and, as far as I knew, learned to create Latin verses of various types in an impressive way. But I never heard that anyone took the time to discover what his natural talents were, where his weaknesses lay, or to tailor any kind of knowledge to him. He had adapted to the verses and mastered the art of crafting them so well that if he had stayed in school until he turned eighteen, I suppose he could only have continued making them repeatedly unless he expanded his education by unlearning how to do it. Still, even though I'm sure they were beautiful, enriching, and quite adequate for many life purposes, always remembered throughout life, I did question whether Richard might have benefited from someone studying him a little, instead of him focusing on them so much.

To be sure, I knew nothing of the subject, and do not even now know whether the young gentlemen of classic Rome or Greece made verses to the same extent—or whether the young gentlemen of any country ever did.

To be honest, I didn't know anything about the topic, and I still don't know if the young men of ancient Rome or Greece wrote poetry to the same degree—or if young men from any country ever did.

"I haven't the least idea," said Richard, musing, "what I had better be. Except that I am quite sure I don't want to go into the Church, it's a toss-up."

"I have no idea," said Richard, thinking out loud, "what I should be. The only thing I'm sure about is that I really don't want to go into the Church; it's a total gamble."

"You have no inclination in Mr. Kenge's way?" suggested Mr. Jarndyce.

"You don't have any interest in Mr. Kenge's style?" suggested Mr. Jarndyce.

"I don't know that, sir!" replied Richard. "I am fond of boating. Articled clerks go a good deal on the water. It's a capital profession!"

"I don't know that, sir!" Richard replied. "I really enjoy boating. Trainee solicitors spend a lot of time on the water. It's a great profession!"

"Surgeon—" suggested Mr. Jarndyce.

"Surgeon—" suggested Mr. Jarndyce.

"That's the thing, sir!" cried Richard.

"That's the issue, sir!" cried Richard.

I doubt if he had ever once thought of it before.

I doubt he had ever thought about it before.

"That's the thing, sir!" repeated Richard, with the greatest enthusiasm. "We have got it at last. M.R.C.S.!"

"That's the thing, sir!" Richard repeated, full of excitement. "We finally got it. M.R.C.S.!"

He was not to be laughed out of it, though he laughed at it heartily. He said he had chosen his profession, and the more he thought of it, the more he felt that his destiny was clear; the art of healing was the art of all others for him. Mistrusting that he only came to this conclusion, because, having never had much chance of finding out for himself what he was fitted for, and having never been guided to the discovery, he was taken by the newest idea, and was glad to get rid of the trouble of consideration, I wondered whether the Latin Verses often ended in this, or whether Richard's was a solitary case.

He wasn't going to let anyone laugh him out of it, even though he laughed about it a lot. He said he had chosen his career, and the more he thought about it, the more he felt that his path was clear; the art of healing was the perfect fit for him. Doubting that he had come to this conclusion because he didn't have much chance to figure out what he was really suited for, and having never been guided to discover it, I wondered if he was just caught up in the latest trend and was happy to avoid the hassle of thinking it through. I questioned whether Latin verses often ended like this, or if Richard's was an unusual case.

Mr. Jarndyce took great pains to talk with him, seriously, and to put it to his good sense not to deceive himself in so important a matter. Richard was a little grave after these interviews; but invariably told Ada and me "that it was all right," and then began to talk about something else.

Mr. Jarndyce made a real effort to speak with him seriously and to appeal to his good sense not to fool himself about such an important issue. Richard seemed a bit serious after these conversations, but he always told Ada and me "that everything was fine," and then he would shift the topic to something else.

"By Heaven!" cried Mr. Boythorn, who interested himself strongly in the subject—though I need not say that, for he could do nothing weakly; "I rejoice to find a young gentleman of spirit and gallantry devoting himself to that noble profession! The more spirit there is in it, the better for mankind, and the worse for those mercenary taskmasters and low tricksters who delight in putting that illustrious art at a disadvantage in the world. By all that is base and despicable," cried Mr. Boythorn, "the treatment of Surgeons aboard ship is such, that I would submit the legs—both legs—of every member of the Admiralty Board to a compound fracture, and render it a transportable offense in any qualified practitioner to set them, if the system were not wholly changed in eight-and-forty hours!"

"By Heaven!" shouted Mr. Boythorn, who was deeply invested in the topic—though that’s no surprise, since he never did anything halfway; "I'm thrilled to see a young man of spirit and bravery dedicating himself to such a noble profession! The more passion there is in it, the better it is for humanity, and the worse for those greedy taskmasters and shady tricksters who take pleasure in undermining that esteemed art. By everything that is low and contemptible," Mr. Boythorn exclaimed, "the treatment of surgeons on ships is so bad that I would gladly put the legs—both legs—of every member of the Admiralty Board through a compound fracture, and make it a punishable offense for any qualified doctor to fix them, if the system isn’t completely overhauled in just forty-eight hours!"

"Wouldn't you give them a week?" asked Mr. Jarndyce.

"Wouldn't you give them a week?" asked Mr. Jarndyce.

"No!" cried Mr. Boythorn, firmly. "Not on any consideration! Eight-and-forty hours! As to Corporations, Parishes, Vestry-Boards, and similar gatherings of jolter-headed clods, who assemble to exchange such speeches that, by Heaven! they ought to be worked in quicksilver mines for the short remainder of their miserable existence, if it were only to prevent their detestable English from contaminating a language spoken in the presence of the Sun—as to those fellows, who meanly take advantage of the ardor of gentlemen in the pursuit of knowledge, to recompense the inestimable services of the best years of their lives, their long study, and their expensive education, with pittances too small for the acceptance of clerks, I would have the necks[Pg 185] of every one of them wrung, and their skulls arranged in Surgeons' Hall for the contemplation of the whole profession—in order that its younger members might understand from actual measurement, in early life, how thick skulls may become!"

"No!" shouted Mr. Boythorn, firmly. "Not under any circumstances! Forty-eight hours! As for Corporations, Parishes, Vestry-Boards, and other gatherings of clueless people, who come together to exchange speeches that, honestly, they should be working in quicksilver mines for the limited time left in their miserable lives, just to prevent their awful English from polluting a language spoken in the sunlight—as for those guys, who selfishly take advantage of the enthusiasm of gentlemen pursuing knowledge, to repay the invaluable services of the best years of their lives, their lengthy studies, and their costly education, with meager amounts too small for clerks to accept, I would have the necks[Pg 185] of each of them wrung, and their skulls displayed in Surgeons' Hall for everyone in the profession to see—so that younger members might learn from real examples, early in life, how thick skulls can become!"

He wound up this vehement declaration by looking round upon us with a most agreeable smile, and suddenly thundering, Ha, ha, ha! over and over again, until any body else might have been expected to be quite subdued by the exertion.

He ended this passionate statement by looking around at us with a pleasant smile and suddenly laughing, "Ha, ha, ha!" repeatedly, until anyone else would have likely been worn out by the effort.

As Richard still continued to say that he was fixed in his choice, after repeated periods for consideration had been recommended by Mr. Jarndyce, and had expired; and as he still continued to assure Ada and me, in the same final manner that it was "all right;" it became advisable to take Mr. Kenge into council. Mr. Kenge therefore, came down to dinner one day, and leaned back in his chair, and turned his eye-glasses over and over, and spoke in a sonorous voice, and did exactly what I remembered to have seen him do when I was a little girl.

As Richard kept insisting that he had made up his mind, even after Mr. Jarndyce suggested multiple times for him to take a moment to think things over, and that time had passed; and as he continued to assure Ada and me, in the same decisive way, that it was "all good;" it seemed wise to consult Mr. Kenge. So, Mr. Kenge came over for dinner one day, leaned back in his chair, fiddled with his eyeglasses, spoke in a deep voice, and did exactly what I remembered seeing him do when I was a little girl.

"Ah!" said Mr. Kenge. "Yes. Well? A very good profession, Mr. Jarndyce; a very good profession."

"Ah!" said Mr. Kenge. "Yes. So? A really good profession, Mr. Jarndyce; a really good profession."

"The course of study and preparation requires to be diligently pursued," observed my Guardian, with a glance at Richard.

"The course of study and preparation needs to be taken seriously," my Guardian noted, glancing at Richard.

"O, no doubt," said Mr. Kenge. "Diligently."

"O, no doubt," Mr. Kenge said. "Absolutely."

"But that being the case, more or less, with all pursuits that are worth much," said Mr. Jarndyce, "it is not a special consideration which another choice would be likely to escape."

"But since that's generally true for all worthwhile pursuits," said Mr. Jarndyce, "it's not something that another option would likely avoid."

"Truly," said Mr. Kenge. "And Mr. Richard Carstone, who has so meritoriously acquitted himself in the—shall I say the classic shades?—in which his youth had been passed, will, no doubt, apply the habits, if not the principles and practice, of versification in that tongue in which a poet was said (unless I mistake) to be born, not made, to the more eminently practical field of action on which he enters."

"Truly," said Mr. Kenge. "And Mr. Richard Carstone, who has done such a great job in the—should I say the classic settings?—where he spent his youth, will probably apply the habits, if not the principles and practice, of poetry in the language that a poet was said (unless I'm wrong) to be born, not made, to the more practical field of action he is stepping into."

"You may rely upon it," said Richard, in his off-hand manner, "that I shall go at it, and do my best."

"You can count on it," Richard said casually, "that I'm going to tackle it and give it my all."

"Very well, Mr. Jarndyce!" said Mr. Kenge, gently nodding his head. "Really, when we are assured by Mr. Richard that he means to go at it, and to do his best," nodding feelingly and smoothly over those expressions; "I would submit to you, that we have only to inquire into the best mode of carrying out the object of his ambition. Now, with reference to placing Mr. Richard with some sufficiently eminent practitioner. Is there any one in view at present?"

"Alright, Mr. Jarndyce!" said Mr. Kenge, gently nodding his head. "Honestly, when Mr. Richard assures us that he intends to pursue this and give it his all," nodding meaningfully and smoothly over those words; "I would suggest that we only need to look into the best way to achieve his goals. Now, regarding placing Mr. Richard with a well-respected practitioner. Is there anyone in mind at this time?"

"No one, Rick, I think?" said my Guardian.

"No one, right, Rick?" said my Guardian.

"No one, sir," said Richard.

"No one, sir," Richard replied.

"Quite so!" observed Mr. Kenge. "As to situation, now. Is there any particular feeling on that head?"

"Exactly!" remarked Mr. Kenge. "Now, regarding the situation. Is there any specific feeling about that?"

"N—no," said Richard.

"No," said Richard.

"Quite so!" observed Mr. Kenge again.

"Exactly!" Mr. Kenge noted again.

"I should like a little variety," said Richard; "—I mean a good range of experience."

"I'd like a bit of variety," Richard said; "—I mean a solid range of experiences."

"Very requisite, no doubt," returned Mr. Kenge "I think this may be easily arranged, Mr. Jarndyce? We have only, in the first place, to discover a sufficiently eligible practitioner; and, as soon as we make our want—and, shall I add, our ability to pay a premium?—known, our only difficulty will be in the selection of one from a large number. We have only, in the second place, to observe those little formalities which are rendered necessary by our time of life, and our being under the guardianship of the Court. We shall soon be—shall I say, in Mr. Richard's own light-hearted manner, 'going at it'—to our heart's content. It is a coincidence," said Mr. Kenge, with a tinge of melancholy in his smile, "one of those coincidences which may or may not require an explanation beyond our present limited faculties, that I have a cousin in the medical profession. He might be deemed eligible by you, and might be disposed to respond to this proposal. I can answer for him as little as for you; but he might?"

"Absolutely necessary, no doubt," replied Mr. Kenge. "I think this can be arranged easily, Mr. Jarndyce. First, we just need to find a qualified practitioner, and once we make our needs—and, shall I add, our ability to pay a fee?—known, our only challenge will be choosing from many options. Secondly, we just have to follow the little formalities required by our age and the fact that we are under the Court's guardianship. We'll soon be—should I say, in Mr. Richard's own light-hearted way, 'getting started'—to our heart's content. It's a coincidence," Mr. Kenge said, with a hint of sadness in his smile, "one of those coincidences that might or might not need an explanation beyond what we currently understand, that I have a cousin in the medical field. You might find him suitable, and he might be willing to consider this offer. I can vouch for him just as little as I can for you; but he might?"

As this was an opening in the prospect, it was arranged that Mr. Kenge should see his cousin. And as Mr. Jarndyce had before proposed to take us to London for a few weeks, it was settled next day that we should make our visit at once, and combine Richard's business with it.

As this was an opportunity in the plan, it was arranged for Mr. Kenge to meet his cousin. Since Mr. Jarndyce had previously suggested taking us to London for a few weeks, it was decided the next day that we would go right away and combine Richard's business with the trip.

Mr. Boythorn leaving us within a week, we took up our abode at a cheerful lodging near Oxford-street, over an upholsterer's shop. London was a great wonder to us, and we were out for hours and hours at a time, seeing the sights; which appeared to be less capable of exhaustion than we were. We made the round of the principal theatres, too, with great delight, and saw all the plays that were worth seeing. I mention this, because it was at the theatre that I began to be made uncomfortable again, by Mr. Guppy.

Mr. Boythorn was leaving us in a week, so we settled into a cheerful place near Oxford Street, above an upholstery shop. London amazed us, and we spent hours exploring, seeing the sights, which seemed endless compared to our own energy. We also happily visited the main theaters and caught all the worthwhile plays. I bring this up because it was at the theater that Mr. Guppy started to make me uncomfortable again.

I was sitting in front of the box one night with Ada; and Richard was in the place he liked best, behind Ada's chair; when, happening to look down into the pit, I saw Mr. Guppy, with his hair flattened down upon his head, and woe depicted in his face, looking up at me. I felt, all through the performance, that he never looked at the actors, but constantly looked at me, and always with a carefully prepared expression of the deepest misery and the profoundest dejection.

I was sitting in front of the TV one night with Ada, and Richard was in his favorite spot, behind Ada's chair. When I happened to glance down into the audience, I saw Mr. Guppy, his hair slicked down on his head and despair clearly written on his face, looking up at me. Throughout the show, I sensed that he wasn’t paying attention to the actors at all; instead, he kept staring at me, always with a carefully crafted look of utter misery and deep sadness.

It quite spoiled my pleasure for that night, because it was so very embarrassing and so very ridiculous. But, from that time forth, we never went to the play, without my seeing Mr. Guppy in the pit—always with his hair straight and flat, his shirt-collar turned down, and a general feebleness about him. If he were not there when we went in, and I began to hope he would not come, and yielded myself for a little while to the interest of the scene, I was certain to encounter his languishing eyes when I least expected it, and, from that time, to be quite sure that they were fixed upon me all the evening.

It really ruined my enjoyment that night because it was so embarrassing and ridiculous. But from then on, we never went to the theater without me spotting Mr. Guppy in the audience—always with his hair slicked down, his shirt collar turned down, and a general sense of weakness about him. If he wasn't there when we arrived, and I started to hope he wouldn't show up, losing myself for a bit in the excitement of the play, I would inevitably run into his longing gaze when I least expected it, and from that moment on, I would be completely sure he was staring at me the entire evening.

I really can not express how uneasy this made me. If he would only have brushed up his hair, or turned up his collar, it would have been bad[Pg 187] enough; but to know that that absurd figure was always gazing at me, and always in that demonstrative state of despondency, put such a constraint upon me that I did not like to laugh at the play, or to cry at it, or to move, or to speak. I seemed able to do nothing naturally. As to escaping Mr. Guppy by going to the back of the box, I could not bear to do that; because I knew Richard and Ada relied on having me next them, and that they could never have talked together so happily if any body else had been in my place. So there I sat, not knowing where to look—for wherever I looked, I knew Mr. Guppy's eyes were following me—and thinking of the dreadful expense to which this young man was putting himself, on my account.

I really can’t say how uncomfortable this made me. If he had just combed his hair or adjusted his collar, that would have been bad enough. But knowing that ridiculous figure was always staring at me, looking so dramatically miserable, made it so hard for me that I didn’t want to laugh at the play, or cry, or move, or speak. I felt completely unable to act naturally. I didn’t want to get away from Mr. Guppy by moving to the back of the box because I knew Richard and Ada depended on having me next to them, and they wouldn’t have been able to chat as happily if anyone else were in my spot. So I sat there, not knowing where to look—because no matter where I glanced, I knew Mr. Guppy’s eyes were on me—and worrying about the huge expense this young man was taking on because of me.[Pg 187]

MR. GUPPY'S DESOLATION. Mr. Guppy's Heartbreak.

Sometimes I thought of telling Mr. Jarndyce. Then I feared that the young man would lose his situation, and that I might ruin him. Sometimes, I thought of confiding in Richard; but was deterred by the possibility of his fighting Mr. Guppy, and giving him black eyes. Sometimes, I thought, should I frown at him, or shake my head. Then I felt I could not do it. Sometimes, I considered whether I should write to his mother, but that ended in my being convinced that to open a correspondence would be to make the matter worse. I always came to the conclusion, finally, that I could do nothing. Mr. Guppy's perseverance, all this time, not only produced him regularly at any theatre to which we went, but caused him to appear in the crowd as we were coming out, and even to get up behind our fly—where I am sure I saw him, two or three times, struggling among the most dreadful spikes. After we got home, he haunted a post opposite our house. The upholsterer's where we lodged, being at the corner of two streets, and my bedroom window being opposite the post, I was afraid to go near the window when I went up-stairs, lest I should see him (as I did one moonlight night) leaning against the post, and evidently catching[Pg 188] cold. If Mr. Guppy had not been, fortunately for me, engaged in the day-time, I really should have had no rest from him.

Sometimes I thought about telling Mr. Jarndyce. Then I worried that the young man would lose his job, and I might ruin him. Occasionally, I considered confiding in Richard; but I was held back by the chance of him confronting Mr. Guppy and giving him black eyes. At times, I wondered if I should scowl at him or shake my head. Then I felt I couldn't do it. I also thought about writing to his mother, but that led me to believe that starting a correspondence would only make things worse. I always ended up deciding that I could do nothing. Throughout all this, Mr. Guppy's persistence not only had him showing up regularly at any theater we attended, but also made him appear in the crowd as we were leaving and even to climb into our cab—where I’m sure I saw him two or three times, struggling among the most horrible spikes. After we got home, he lingered by a post across from our house. Since the upholsterer where we stayed was at the corner of two streets, and my bedroom window was right across from the post, I was scared to go near the window when I went upstairs, for fear of seeing him (like I did one moonlit night) leaning against the post, clearly catching a cold. If Mr. Guppy hadn't, fortunately for me, been busy during the day, I really wouldn't have had any peace from him.

While we were making this round of gayeties in which Mr. Guppy so extraordinarily participated, the business which had helped to bring us to town was not neglected. Mr. Kenge's cousin was a Mr. Bayham Badger, who had a good practice at Chelsea, and attended a large public Institution besides. He was quite willing to receive Richard into his house, and to superintend his studies; and as it seemed that those could be pursued advantageously under Mr. Badger's roof, and as Mr. Badger liked Richard, and as Richard said he liked Mr. Badger "well enough," an agreement was made, the Lord Chancellor's consent was obtained, and it was all settled.

While we were enjoying this round of fun, which Mr. Guppy was unusually involved in, we didn't forget the reason we came to town. Mr. Kenge's cousin was Mr. Bayham Badger, who had a solid practice in Chelsea and also worked at a large public institution. He was more than happy to take Richard into his home and oversee his studies. Since it seemed that Richard would benefit from studying under Mr. Badger's roof, and since Mr. Badger liked Richard, and Richard said he liked Mr. Badger "well enough," an agreement was reached, the Lord Chancellor gave his approval, and everything was set.

On the day when matters were concluded between Richard and Mr. Badger, we were all under engagement to dine at Mr. Badger's house. We were to be "merely a family party," Mrs. Badger's note said; and we found no lady there but Mrs. Badger herself. She was surrounded in the drawing-room by various objects, indicative of her painting a little, playing the piano a little, playing the guitar a little, playing the harp a little, singing a little, working a little, reading a little, writing poetry a little, and botanizing a little. She was a lady of about fifty, I should think, youthfully dressed, and of a very fine complexion. If I add, to the little list of her accomplishments, that she rouged a little, I do not mean that there was any harm in it.

On the day when things were finalized between Richard and Mr. Badger, we were all invited to dinner at Mr. Badger's house. Mrs. Badger’s note stated that it was to be "just a family gathering," and we found no other woman there besides Mrs. Badger herself. In the drawing room, she was surrounded by various things that suggested she dabbled a bit in painting, played the piano, guitar, and harp a little, sang a little, worked a little, read a little, wrote poetry a little, and explored botany a little. She looked to be around fifty, dressed in a youthful manner, and had a very lovely complexion. If I mention that she used a bit of makeup, I don’t mean to imply there was anything wrong with it.

Mr. Bayham Badger himself was a pink, fresh-faced, crisp-looking gentleman, with a weak voice, white teeth, light hair, and surprised eyes: some years younger, I should say, than Mrs. Bayham Badger. He admired her exceedingly, but principally, and to begin with, on the curious ground (as it seemed to us) of her having had three husbands. We had barely taken our seats, when he said to Mr. Jarndyce quite triumphantly.

Mr. Bayham Badger himself was a pink, fresh-faced, sharp-looking guy, with a weak voice, white teeth, light hair, and surprised eyes: I’d say he was a few years younger than Mrs. Bayham Badger. He admired her a lot, but mainly, and to start with, for what seemed like a strange reason to us: that she had been married three times. We had hardly settled in when he said to Mr. Jarndyce with a bit of triumph.

"You would hardly suppose that I am Mrs. Bayham Badger's third!"

"You would barely believe that I’m Mrs. Bayham Badger’s third!"

"Indeed?" said Mr. Jarndyce.

"Really?" said Mr. Jarndyce.

"Her third!" said Mr. Badger. "Mrs. Bayham Badger has not the appearance, Miss Summerson, of a lady who has had two former husbands?"

"Her third!" said Mr. Badger. "Mrs. Bayham Badger doesn’t look like someone who has been married twice before, Miss Summerson?"

I said "Not at all!"

I said, "Not at all!"

"And most remarkable men!" said Mr. Badger, in a tone of confidence. "Captain Swosser of the Royal Navy, who was Mrs. Badger's first husband, was a very distinguished officer indeed. The name of Professor Dingo, my immediate predecessor, is one of European reputation."

"And most remarkable men!" said Mr. Badger, in a confident tone. "Captain Swosser of the Royal Navy, who was Mrs. Badger's first husband, was an exceptionally distinguished officer. The name of Professor Dingo, my direct predecessor, is well-known across Europe."

Mrs. Badger overheard him, and smiled.

Mrs. Badger heard him and smiled.

"Yes, my dear!" Mr. Badger replied to the smile, "I was observing to Mr. Jarndyce and Miss Summerson, that you had had two former husbands—both very distinguished men. And they found it, as people generally do, difficult to believe."

"Yes, my dear!" Mr. Badger replied with a smile, "I was telling Mr. Jarndyce and Miss Summerson that you've had two previous husbands—both very distinguished men. They found it, like most people do, hard to believe."

"I was barely twenty," said Mrs. Badger, "when I married Captain Swosser of the Royal[Pg 189] Navy. I was in the Mediterranean with him; I am quite a Sailor. On the twelfth anniversary of my wedding-day, I became the wife of Professor Dingo."

"I was just twenty," said Mrs. Badger, "when I married Captain Swosser of the Royal[Pg 189] Navy. I was in the Mediterranean with him; I'm quite a sailor. On the twelfth anniversary of my wedding day, I became the wife of Professor Dingo."

("Of European reputation," added Mr. Badger in an under tone.)

("Of European reputation," Mr. Badger added in a low voice.)

"And when Mr. Badger and myself were married," pursued Mrs. Badger, "we were married on the same day of the year. I had become attached to the day."

"And when Mr. Badger and I got married," continued Mrs. Badger, "we were married on the same day of the year. I had grown fond of that day."

"So that Mrs. Badger has been married to three husbands—two of them highly distinguished men," said Mr. Badger, summing up the facts; "and, each time, upon the twenty-first of March at Eleven in the forenoon!"

"So, Mrs. Badger has been married to three husbands—two of them very notable men," Mr. Badger said, summarizing the details; "and each time, on the twenty-first of March at eleven in the morning!"

We all expressed our admiration.

We all shared our admiration.

"But for Mr. Badger's modesty," said Mr. Jarndyce, "I would take leave to correct him, and say three distinguished men."

"But for Mr. Badger's modesty," Mr. Jarndyce said, "I would correct him and say three notable men."

"Thank you, Mr. Jarndyce! What I always tell him!" observed Mrs. Badger.

"Thank you, Mr. Jarndyce! That's what I always tell him!" Mrs. Badger noted.

"And, my dear," said Mr. Badger, "what do I always tell you? That without any affectation of disparaging such professional distinction as I may have attained (which our friend Mr. Carstone will have many opportunities of estimating), I am not so weak—no, really," said Mr. Badger to us generally, "so unreasonable—as to put my reputation on the same footing with such first-rate men as Captain Swosser and Professor Dingo. Perhaps you may be interested, Mr. Jarndyce," continued Mr. Bayham Badger, leading the way into the next drawing room, "in this portrait of Captain Swosser. It was taken on his return home from the African Station, where he had suffered from the fever of the country. Mrs. Badger considers it too yellow. But it's a very fine head. A very fine head!"

"And, my dear," said Mr. Badger, "what do I always tell you? That without trying to downplay any professional achievement I've made (which our friend Mr. Carstone will have plenty of chances to judge), I'm not so weak—no, really," Mr. Badger said to all of us, "so unreasonable—as to put my reputation on the same level as such top-notch individuals as Captain Swosser and Professor Dingo. You might find this interesting, Mr. Jarndyce," Mr. Bayham Badger continued, leading us into the next drawing room, "this portrait of Captain Swosser. It was taken when he got back from the African Station, where he had suffered from the local fever. Mrs. Badger thinks it's too yellow. But it’s a really impressive likeness. A very impressive likeness!"

We all echoed, "A very fine head!"

We all chimed in, "What a great head!"

"I feel when I look at it," said Mr. Badger, "'that's a man I should like to have seen!' It strikingly bespeaks the first-class man that Captain Swosser pre-eminently was. On the other side, Professor Dingo. I knew him well—attended him in his last illness—a speaking likeness! Over the piano, Mrs. Bayham Badger when Mrs. Swosser. Over the sofa, Mrs. Bayham Badger when Mrs. Dingo. Of Mrs. Bayham Badger in esse, I possess the original, and have no copy."

"I feel that when I look at it," said Mr. Badger, "'that's a guy I would have loved to meet!' It clearly shows what a first-class guy Captain Swosser truly was. On the other side, there's Professor Dingo. I knew him well—took care of him in his last days—a perfect likeness! Over the piano, there's Mrs. Bayham Badger as Mrs. Swosser. Over the sofa, it's Mrs. Bayham Badger as Mrs. Dingo. I have the original of Mrs. Bayham Badger in esse, and I don’t have a copy."

Dinner was now announced, and we went down stairs. It was a very genteel entertainment, very handsomely served. But the Captain and the Professor still ran in Mr. Badger's head, and, as Ada and I had the honor of being under his particular care, we had the full benefit of them.

Dinner was announced, and we went downstairs. It was a very classy event, nicely presented. But the Captain and the Professor were still on Mr. Badger's mind, and since Ada and I had the privilege of being under his special attention, we got to experience all of it.

"Water, Miss Summerson? Allow me! Not in that tumbler, pray. Bring me the Professor's goblet, James!"

"Water, Miss Summerson? Let me get that! Not in that tumbler, please. Bring me the Professor's goblet, James!"

Ada very much admired some artificial flowers, under a glass.

Ada really admired some artificial flowers under a glass.

"Astonishing how they keep!" said Mr. Badger. "They were presented to Mrs. Bayham Badger when she was in the Mediterranean."

"Amazing how well they keep!" said Mr. Badger. "They were given to Mrs. Bayham Badger when she was in the Mediterranean."

THE FAMILY PORTRAITS AT MR. BAYHAM BADGER'S. THE FAMILY PORTRAITS AT MR. BAYHAM BADGER'S.

He invited Mr. Jarndyce to take a glass of claret.

He invited Mr. Jarndyce to have a glass of red wine.

"Not that claret," he said. "Excuse me! This is an occasion, and on an occasion I produce some very special claret I happen to have. (James, Captain Swosser's wine!) Mr. Jarndyce, this is a wine that was imported by the Captain, we will not say how many years ago. You will find it very curious. My dear, I shall be happy to take some of this wine with you. (Captain Swosser's claret to your mistress, James!) My love, your health!"

"Not that claret," he said. "Excuse me! This is a special occasion, and for an occasion like this, I’m bringing out some very special claret that I have. (James, Captain Swosser's wine!) Mr. Jarndyce, this is a wine that was imported by the Captain, and let's just say it's been many years. You’ll find it quite interesting. My dear, I would be happy to share a glass of this wine with you. (Captain Swosser's claret for your lady, James!) My love, cheers to your health!"

After dinner when we ladies retired, we took Mrs. Badger's first and second husband with us. Mrs. Badger gave us, in the drawing-room a Biographical sketch of the life and services of Captain Swosser before his marriage, and a more minute account of him dating from the time when he fell in love with her, at a ball on board the Crippler, given to the officers of that ship when she lay in Plymouth harbor.

After dinner, when we ladies went upstairs, we brought along Mrs. Badger's first and second husbands with us. In the drawing room, Mrs. Badger shared a biographical sketch of Captain Swosser's life and accomplishments before he got married, along with a more detailed story about him starting from when he fell in love with her at a ball on the Crippler, which was held for the ship's officers while it was in Plymouth harbor.

"The dear old Crippler!" said Mrs. Badger, shaking her head. "She was a noble vessel. Trim, ship-shape, all a taunto, as Captain Swosser used to say. You must excuse me if I occasionally introduce a nautical expression; I was quite a sailor once. Captain Swosser loved that craft for my sake. When she was no longer in commission, he frequently said that if he were rich enough to buy her old hulk, he would have an inscription let into the timbers of the quarter-deck where we stood as partners in the dance, to mark the spot where he fell—raked fore and aft (Captain Swosser used to say) by the fire from my tops. It was his naval way of mentioning my eyes."

"The dear old Crippler!" Mrs. Badger said, shaking her head. "She was a great ship. Neat and tidy, just as Captain Swosser used to say. Please forgive me if I slip in a nautical term now and then; I used to be quite the sailor. Captain Swosser loved that vessel for my sake. When she was out of service, he often said that if he were wealthy enough to buy her old hull, he would have an inscription carved into the timbers of the quarter-deck where we danced together, marking the spot where he fell—hit from all sides (Captain Swosser would say) by the fire from my eyes."

Mrs. Badger shook her head, sighed, and looked in the glass.

Mrs. Badger shook her head, sighed, and looked in the mirror.

"It was a great change from Captain Swosser to Professor Dingo," she resumed, with a plaintive smile. "I felt it a good deal at first. Such an entire revolution in my mode of life! But custom, combined with science—particularly science—inured me to it. Being the Professor's sole companion in his botanical excursions, I almost forgot that I had ever been afloat, and became quite learned. It is singular that the Professor was the Antipodes of Captain Swosser, and that Mr. Badger is not in the least like either!"

"It was a huge change from Captain Swosser to Professor Dingo," she continued, with a sad smile. "I felt it quite a bit at first. Such a complete transformation in my way of life! But routine, mixed with science—especially science—got me used to it. Being the Professor's only companion on his botanical trips, I almost forgot that I had ever been at sea and became pretty knowledgeable. It's strange that the Professor was the total opposite of Captain Swosser, and that Mr. Badger is nothing like either of them!"

We then passed into a narrative of the deaths of Captain Swosser and Professor Dingo, both of whom seemed to have had very bad complaints. In the course of it, Mrs. Badger signified to us that she had never madly loved but once; and that the object of that wild affection, never to be recalled in its fresh enthusiasm, was Captain Swosser. The Professor was yet dying by inches in the most dismal manner, and Mrs. Badger was giving us imitations of his way of saying, with great difficulty, "Where is Laura? Let Laura give me my toast and water!" when the entrance of the gentlemen consigned him to the tomb.

We then moved into a story about the deaths of Captain Swosser and Professor Dingo, both of whom seemed to have serious issues. Along the way, Mrs. Badger told us that she had only ever loved madly once, and that the object of that wild affection, which could never be rekindled in its original excitement, was Captain Swosser. The Professor was still dying slowly in a very miserable way, and Mrs. Badger was doing impressions of how he struggled to say, "Where is Laura? Let Laura give me my toast and water!" when the gentlemen arrived, marking the end for him.

Now, I observed that evening, as I had observed for some days past, that Ada and Richard were more than ever attached to each other's society; which was but natural, seeing that they were going to be separated so soon. I was therefore not very much surprised, when we got home, and Ada and I retired up-stairs, to find Ada more silent than usual; though I was not quite prepared for her coming into my arms, and beginning to speak to me, with her face hidden.

Now, that evening, I noticed, as I had for several days, that Ada and Richard were more attached to each other than ever; which made sense, considering they were about to be separated soon. So, I wasn’t too surprised when we got home, and Ada and I went upstairs, to find her more quiet than usual; though I wasn't fully prepared for her to come into my arms and start talking to me with her face hidden.

"My darling Esther!" murmured Ada. "I have a great secret to tell you!"

"My dear Esther!" whispered Ada. "I have a big secret to share with you!"

A mighty secret, my pretty one, no doubt!

A powerful secret, my lovely one, for sure!

"What is it, Ada?"

"What's up, Ada?"

"O Esther, you would never guess!"

"O Esther, you'll never believe this!"

"Shall I try to guess?" said I.

"Should I take a guess?" I asked.

"O no! Don't! Pray, don't!" cried Ada, very much startled by the idea of my doing so.

"O no! Don't! Please, don't!" cried Ada, very startled by the thought of me doing that.

"Now, I wonder who it can be about?" said I, pretending to consider.

"Now, I’m curious about who it could be," I said, pretending to think.

"It's about," said Ada, in a whisper. "It's about—my cousin Richard!"

"It's about," Ada said quietly. "It's about—my cousin Richard!"

"Well, my own!" said I, kissing her bright hair, which was all I could see. "And what about him?"

"Well, my own!" I said, kissing her bright hair, which was all I could see. "And what about him?"

"O, Esther, you would never guess!"

"O, Esther, you would never believe!"

It was so pretty to have her clinging to me in that way, hiding her face; and to know that she was not crying in sorrow, but in a little glow of joy, and pride, and hope; that I would not help her just yet.

It was so nice to have her holding onto me like that, hiding her face; and to know that she wasn’t crying out of sadness, but from a little spark of joy, pride, and hope; that I wouldn’t help her just yet.

"He says—I know it's very foolish, we are both so young—but he says," with a burst of tears, "that he loves me dearly, Esther."

"He says—I know it's really silly, we’re both so young—but he says," with a burst of tears, "that he loves me so much, Esther."

"Does he indeed?" said I. "I never heard of such a thing! Why, my pet of pets, I could have told you that, weeks and weeks ago!"

"Does he really?" I said. "I never heard of that! Honestly, my favorite, I could have told you that weeks ago!"

To see Ada lift up her flushed face in joyful surprise, and hold me round the neck, and laugh, and cry, and blush, and laugh, was so pleasant!

To see Ada lift her flushed face in joyful surprise, wrap her arms around my neck, laugh, cry, blush, and laugh again was so delightful!

"Why, my darling!" said I, "what a goose you must take me for! Your cousin Richard has been loving you as plainly as he could, for I don't know how long!"

"Why, my dear!" I said, "what a fool you must think I am! Your cousin Richard has been loving you as openly as he could for I don’t know how long!"

"And yet you never said a word about it!" cried Ada, kissing me.

"And yet you never said a word about it!" Ada exclaimed, giving me a kiss.

"No, my love," said I. "I waited to be told."

"No, my love," I said. "I was waiting to be told."

"But now I have told you, you don't think it wrong of me; do you?" returned Ada. She might have coaxed me to say No, if I had been the hardest-hearted Duenna in the world. Not being that yet, I said No, very freely.

"But now that I've told you, you don't think it's wrong of me, do you?" Ada replied. She could have easily persuaded me to say No, even if I had been the most heartless guardian in the world. Not being that yet, I said No, quite freely.

"And now," said I, "I know the worst of it."

"And now," I said, "I know the worst of it."

"O, that's not quite the worst of it, Esther dear!" cried Ada, holding me tighter, and laying down her face again upon my breast.

"O, that's not even the worst of it, Esther dear!" cried Ada, holding me tighter and resting her face again on my chest.

"No?" said I. "Not even that?"

"No?" I said. "Not even that?"

"No, not even that!" said Ada, shaking her head.

"Nope, not even that!" Ada said, shaking her head.

"Why, you never mean to say—!" I was beginning in joke.

"Wait, you can't be serious—!" I was starting as a joke.

But Ada looking up, and smiling through her tears, cried. "Yes, I do! You know, you know I do!" and then sobbed out, "With all my heart I do! With all my whole heart, Esther!"

But Ada looked up, smiling through her tears, and exclaimed, "Yes, I do! You know I do!" Then she sobbed, "With all my heart I do! With all my whole heart, Esther!"

I told her, laughing, why, I had known that, too, just as well as I had known the other! And we sat before the fire, and I had all the talking to myself for a little while (though there was not much of it); and Ada was soon quiet and happy. "Do you think my cousin John knows, dear Dame Durden?" she asked.

I told her, laughing, that I had known that just as well as I had known the other! We sat in front of the fire, and I did most of the talking for a bit (though there wasn’t much to say); and Ada was soon calm and content. "Do you think my cousin John knows, dear Dame Durden?" she asked.

"Unless my cousin John is blind, my pet," said I, "I should think my cousin John knows pretty well as much as we know."

"Unless my cousin John is blind, my pet," I said, "I think my cousin John knows just as much as we do."

"We want to speak to him before Richard goes," said Ada, timidly, "and we wanted you to advise us, and to tell him so. Perhaps you wouldn't mind Richard's coming in, Dame Durden?"

"We want to talk to him before Richard leaves," Ada said quietly, "and we were hoping you could help us by letting him know. Would you mind if Richard came in, Dame Durden?"

"O! Richard is outside, is he, my dear?" said I.

"O! Richard is outside, is he, my dear?" I said.

"I am not quite certain," returned Ada, with a bashful simplicity that would have won my heart, if she had not won it long before; "but I think he's waiting at the door."

"I’m not really sure," Ada replied, with a shy honesty that would have captured my heart if she hadn’t already done so long ago; "but I think he’s waiting at the door."

There he was, of course. They brought a chair on either side of me, and put me between them, and really seemed to have fallen in love with me, instead of one another; they were so confiding, and so trustful, and so fond of me. They went on in their own wild way for a little while—I never stopped them; I enjoyed it too much myself—and then we gradually fell to considering how young they were, and how there must be a lapse of several years before this early love could come to any thing, and how it could come to happiness only if it were real and lasting, and inspired them with a steady resolution to do their duty to each other, with constancy, fortitude, and perseverance: each always for the other's sake. Well! Richard said that he would work his fingers[Pg 193] to the bone for Ada, and Ada said that she would work her fingers to the bone for Richard, and they called me all sorts of endearing and sensible names, and we sat there, advising and talking, half the night. Finally, before we parted, I gave them my promise to speak to their cousin John to-morrow.

There he was, of course. They brought a chair on either side of me and sat me between them, and it really seemed like they had fallen in love with me instead of with each other; they were so open, so trusting, and so fond of me. They went on in their own wild way for a little while—I never stopped them; I enjoyed it too much myself—and then we gradually started thinking about how young they were, and how there had to be a gap of several years before this early love could turn into anything, and how it could only lead to happiness if it was real and lasting, which inspired them to have a steadfast resolution to do their duty to each other, with dedication, courage, and perseverance: each always looking out for the other. Well! Richard said he would work his fingers[Pg 193] to the bone for Ada, and Ada said she would work her fingers to the bone for Richard, and they called me all sorts of sweet and sensible names, and we sat there, advising and chatting, for half the night. Finally, before we parted ways, I promised to talk to their cousin John tomorrow.

So, when to-morrow came, I went to my Guardian after breakfast, in the room that was our town-substitute for the Growlery, and told him that I had it in trust to tell him something.

So, when tomorrow came, I went to my Guardian after breakfast, in the room that was our town's equivalent of the Growlery, and told him that I had something to share with him.

"Well, little woman," said he, shutting up his book, "if you have accepted the trust, there can be no harm in it."

"Well, little lady," he said, closing his book, "if you've taken on the responsibility, it can't be a bad thing."

"I hope not, Guardian," said I. "I can guarantee that there is no secresy in it. For it only happened yesterday."

"I hope not, Guardian," I said. "I can guarantee there's no secret about it. It only happened yesterday."

"Ay? And what is it, Esther?"

"Hey? What's up, Esther?"

"Guardian," said I, "you remember the happy night when we first came down to Bleak House? When Ada was singing in the dark room?"

"Guardian," I said, "do you remember the happy night when we first arrived at Bleak House? When Ada was singing in that dark room?"

I wished to recall to his remembrance the look he had given me then. Unless I am much mistaken, I saw that I did so.

I wanted to remind him of the look he had given me back then. Unless I'm really mistaken, I think I succeeded.

"Because," said I, with a little hesitation.

"Because," I said, pausing slightly.

"Yes, my dear!" said he. "Don't hurry."

"Yes, my dear!" he said. "Take your time."

"Because," said I, "Ada and Richard have fallen in love. And have told each other so."

"Because," I said, "Ada and Richard have fallen in love. And they've told each other."

"Already?" cried my Guardian, quite astonished.

"Already?" exclaimed my Guardian, clearly surprised.

"Yes!" said I, "and to tell you the truth, Guardian, I rather expected it."

"Yes!" I said, "and to be honest, Guardian, I kind of expected it."

"The deuce you did!" said he.

"The heck you did!" he said.

He sat considering for a minute or two; with his smile, at once so handsome and so kind, upon his changing face; and then requested me to let them know that he wished to see them. When they came, he encircled Ada with one arm, in his fatherly way, and addressed himself to Richard with a cheerful gravity.

He sat thinking for a minute or two, his smile being both charming and warm on his changing face. Then he asked me to let them know he wanted to see them. When they arrived, he wrapped one arm around Ada in a fatherly way and spoke to Richard with a cheerful seriousness.

"Rick," said Mr. Jarndyce, "I am glad to have won your confidence. I hope to preserve it. When I contemplated these relations between us four which have so brightened my life, and so invested it with new interests and pleasures, I certainly did contemplate, afar off, the possibility of you and your pretty cousin here (don't be shy, Ada, don't be shy, my dear!) being in a mind to go through life together. I saw, and do see, many reasons to make it desirable. But that was afar off, Rick, afar off!"

"Rick," Mr. Jarndyce said, "I’m really happy to have earned your trust. I hope to keep it. When I thought about the connections between the four of us that have brightened my life and given it new interests and joys, I did imagine, from a distance, the possibility of you and your lovely cousin here (don’t be shy, Ada, don’t be shy, my dear!) wanting to go through life together. I saw, and still see, many reasons why that would be a great thing. But that was a long way off, Rick, a long way off!"

"We look afar off, sir," returned Richard.

"We're looking far away, sir," replied Richard.

"Well!" said Mr. Jarndyce. "That's rational. Now, hear me, my dears! I might tell you that you don't know your own minds yet; that a thousand things may happen to divert you from one another; that it is well this chain of flowers you have taken up is very easily broken, or it might become a chain of lead. But I will not do that. Such wisdom will come soon enough, I dare say, if it is to come at all. I will assume that, a few years hence, you will be in your hearts to one another, what you are to-day. All I say before speaking to you according to that assumption is, if you do change—if you do come to find[Pg 194] that you are more commonplace cousins to each other as man and woman, than you were as boy and girl (your manhood will excuse me, Rick!)—don't be ashamed still to confide in me, for there will be nothing monstrous or uncommon in it. I am only your friend and distant kinsman. I have no power over you whatever. But I wish and hope to retain your confidence, if I do nothing to forfeit it."

"Well!" said Mr. Jarndyce. "That makes sense. Now, listen up, my dears! I could say that you don’t really know what you want yet; that a million things could come up that might pull you apart; that it’s good this chain of flowers you've picked up is so easy to break, or it could end up weighing you down. But I won’t say that. You’ll figure that out soon enough, I’m sure, if it’s meant to be. I’m going to assume that a few years from now, in your hearts, you’ll feel for each other the way you do today. All I want to say before I talk to you based on that assumption is, if you do change—if you do realize that you’re more like typical cousins as adults than you were as kids (your maturity will forgive me, Rick!)—don’t feel embarrassed to still share your feelings with me, because there’s nothing strange or unusual about it. I’m just your friend and a distant relative. I have no control over you whatsoever. But I want to keep your trust, unless I do something to lose it."

"I am very sure, sir," returned Richard, "that I speak for Ada, too, when I say that you have the strongest power over us both—rooted in respect, gratitude, and affection, strengthening every day."

"I’m absolutely certain, sir," Richard replied, "that I speak for Ada as well when I say that you have a powerful influence over both of us—based on respect, gratitude, and affection, which grows stronger every day."

"Dear cousin John," said Ada, on his shoulder, "my father's place can never be empty again. All the love and duty I could ever have rendered to him, is transferred to you."

"Dear cousin John," Ada said, resting her hand on his shoulder, "my father's home will never feel empty again. All the love and responsibility I could have given to him is now passed on to you."

"Come!" said Mr. Jarndyce. "Now for our assumption. Now we lift our eyes up, and look hopefully at the distance! Rick, the world is before you; and it is most probable that as you enter it, so it will receive you. Trust in nothing but in Providence and your own efforts. Never separate the two, like the heathen wagoner. Constancy in love is a good thing; but it means nothing, and is nothing, without constancy in every kind of effort. If you had the abilities of all the great men, past and present, you could do nothing well, without sincerely meaning it, and setting about it. If you entertain the supposition that any real success, in great things or in small, ever was or could be, ever will or can be, wrested from Fortune by fits and starts, leave that wrong idea here, or leave your cousin Ada here."

"Come on!" said Mr. Jarndyce. "Now for our assumption. Now we lift our eyes up and look hopefully at the distance! Rick, the world is ahead of you, and it's very likely that as you step into it, that's how it will greet you. Rely on nothing but Providence and your own efforts. Never separate the two, like the foolhardy wagoner. Consistency in love is important, but it means nothing and is nothing without consistency in all types of effort. Even if you had the talents of all the great figures, past and present, you couldn't do anything well without truly meaning it and getting started. If you think that any real success, in big things or small, has ever been or could be, or will ever be or can be, snatched from Fortune through fits and starts, leave that wrong idea behind, or leave your cousin Ada behind."

"I will leave it here, sir," replied Richard, smiling, "if I brought it here just now (but I hope I did not), and will work my way on to my cousin Ada in the hopeful distance."

"I'll leave it here, sir," Richard replied with a smile, "if I just brought it here now (but I hope I didn't), and I’ll make my way to my cousin Ada in the hopeful distance."

"Right!" said Mr. Jarndyce. "If you are not to make her happy, why should you pursue her?"

"Right!" said Mr. Jarndyce. "If you’re not going to make her happy, why should you go after her?"

"I wouldn't make her unhappy—no, not even for her love," retorted Richard, proudly.

"I wouldn't make her unhappy—no, not even for her love," Richard replied proudly.

"Well said!" cried Mr. Jarndyce; "that's well said! She remains here, in her home with me. Love her, Rick, in your active life, no less than in her home when you revisit it, and all will go well. Otherwise, all will go ill. That's the end of my preaching. I think you and Ada had better take a walk."

"Well said!" exclaimed Mr. Jarndyce; "that's really well said! She stays here, at home with me. Love her, Rick, in your busy life just as much as you do when you come back home, and everything will turn out fine. If not, things will go badly. That's all I've got to say. I think you and Ada should go for a walk."

Ada tenderly embraced him, and Richard heartily shook hands with him, and then the cousins went out of the room—looking back again directly, though, to say that they would wait for me.

Ada warmly hugged him, and Richard gave him a firm handshake. Then the cousins stepped out of the room, but they looked back right away to say that they would wait for me.

The door stood open, and we both followed them with our eyes, as they passed down the adjoining room on which the sun was shining, and out at its farther end. Richard, with his head bent, and her hand drawn through his arm, was talking to her very earnestly; and she looked up in his face, listening, and seemed to see nothing else. So young, so beautiful, so full of hope and promise, they went on lightly through the sunlight,[Pg 195] as their own happy thoughts might then be traversing the years to come, and making them all years of brightness. So they passed away into the shadow, and were gone. It was only a burst of light that had been so radiant. The room darkened as they went out, and the sun was clouded over.

The door was wide open, and we both watched them as they walked through the adjacent room where the sun was shining, and out at the other end. Richard, with his head lowered and her hand linked through his arm, was talking to her very intently; she gazed up at his face, listening, and seemed to notice nothing else. So young, so beautiful, so full of hope and promise, they moved lightly through the sunlight, [Pg 195] as if their happy thoughts were wandering through the years ahead, turning them into bright moments. Then they slipped away into the shadow and were gone. It was just a flash of light that had been so brilliant. The room became darker as they left, and the sun was hidden by clouds.

"Am I right, Esther?" said my Guardian, when they were gone.

"Am I right, Esther?" said my Guardian, when they left.

He who was so good and wise, to ask me whether he was right!

He who was so good and wise to ask me if he was right!

"Rick may gain, out of this, the quality he wants. Wants, at the core of so much that is good!" said Mr. Jarndyce, shaking his head. "I have said nothing to Ada, Esther. She has her friend and counselor always near." And he laid his hand lovingly upon my head.

"Rick might get the quality he desires from this. Desires, at the heart of so much that is good!" said Mr. Jarndyce, shaking his head. "I haven't said anything to Ada, Esther. She always has her friend and counselor close by." And he placed his hand gently on my head.

I could not help showing that I was a little moved, though I did all I could to conceal it.

I couldn't help but show that I was a bit affected, even though I tried my hardest to hide it.

"Tut tut!" said he. "But we must take care, too, that our little woman's life is not all consumed in care for others."

"Tut tut!" he said. "But we also need to make sure that our little woman's life isn't completely spent worrying about others."

"Care? My dear Guardian, I believe I am the happiest creature in the world!"

"Care? My dear Guardian, I honestly think I’m the happiest person in the world!"

"I believe so too," said he. "But some one may find out, what Esther never will—that the little woman is to be held in remembrance above all other people!"

"I believe that too," he said. "But someone might discover what Esther never will—that the little woman should be remembered more than anyone else!"

I have omitted to mention in its place, that there was some one else at the family dinner party. It was not a lady. It was a gentleman. It was a gentleman of a dark complexion—a young surgeon. He was rather reserved, but I thought him very sensible and agreeable. At least, Ada asked me if I did not, and I said yes.

I forgot to mention that there was someone else at the family dinner party. It wasn’t a lady; it was a gentleman. He was a young surgeon with dark features. He was somewhat reserved, but I found him quite sensible and likable. At least, Ada asked me if I felt that way, and I said yes.

(TO BE CONTINUED.)

(TO BE CONTINUED.)


THE COUNTER-STROKE.

Just after breakfast one fine spring morning in 1837, an advertisement in the Times for a curate caught and fixed my attention. The salary was sufficiently remunerative for a bachelor, and the parish, as I personally knew, one of the most pleasantly situated in all Somersetshire. Having said that, the reader will readily understand that it could not have been a hundred miles from Taunton. I instantly wrote, inclosing testimonials, with which the Rev. Mr. Townley, the rector, was so entirely satisfied, that the return-post brought me a positive engagement, unclogged with the slightest objection to one or two subsidiary items I had stipulated for, and accompanied by an invitation to make the rectory my home till I could conveniently suit myself elsewhere. This was both kind and handsome; and the next day but one I took coach, with a light heart, for my new destination. It thus happened that I became acquainted, and in some degree mixed up, with the train of events it is my present purpose to relate.

Just after breakfast one beautiful spring morning in 1837, an ad in the Times for a curate caught my attention. The salary was quite good for a bachelor, and the parish, which I knew personally, was one of the nicest places in all of Somersetshire. So, it’s easy to see that it wasn’t far from Taunton. I quickly wrote back, including references, and the Rev. Mr. Townley, the rector, was so pleased that I received a firm offer in the return mail, with no objections to one or two minor terms I had asked for, and an invitation to stay at the rectory until I could find a place of my own. This was both generous and considerate; and the day after next, I took a coach with a light heart to my new destination. This is how I became involved in the series of events I’m about to share.

The rector I found to be a stout, portly gentleman, whose years already reached to between sixty and seventy. So many winters, although they had plentifully besprinkled his hair with gray, shone out with ruddy brightness in his still handsome face, and keen, kindly, bright-hazel[Pg 196] eyes; and his voice, hearty and ringing, had not as yet one quaver of age in it. I met him at breakfast on the morning after my arrival, and his reception of me was most friendly. We had spoken together but for a few minutes, when one of the French windows, that led from the breakfast-room into a shrubbery and flower-garden, gently opened and admitted a lady, just then, as I afterward learned, in her nineteenth spring. I use this term almost unconsciously, for I can not even now, in the glowing summer of her life, dissociate her image from that season of youth and joyousness. She was introduced to me, with old-fashioned simplicity, as "My grand-daughter, Agnes Townley." It is difficult to look at beauty through other men's eyes, and, in the present instance, I feel that I should fail miserably in the endeavor to stamp upon this blank, dead paper, any adequate idea of the fresh loveliness, the rose-bud beauty of that young girl. I will merely say, that her perfectly Grecian head, wreathed with wavy bandeaux of bright hair, undulating with golden light, vividly brought to my mind Raphael's halo-tinted portraitures of the Virgin—with this difference, that in place of the holy calm and resignation of the painting, there was in Agnes Townley, a sparkling youth and life, that even amid the heat and glare of a crowded ball-room, or of a theatre, irresistibly suggested and recalled the freshness and perfume of the morning—of a cloudless, rosy morning of May. And, far higher charm than feature-beauty, however exquisite, a sweetness of disposition, a kind gentleness of mind and temper, was evinced in every line of her face, in every accent of the low-pitched, silver voice, that breathed through lips made only to smile.

The rector was a solid, chubby guy, probably around sixty to seventy years old. Despite the gray sprinkling in his hair from many winters, his still-handsome face shone with a healthy glow, and his keen, friendly hazel eyes sparkled. His hearty voice had not yet shown any signs of aging. I met him at breakfast the morning after I arrived, and he welcomed me warmly. We had only talked for a few minutes when one of the French windows leading from the breakfast room to a shrubbery and flower garden slowly opened, and a lady came in who, I later learned, was in her nineteenth spring. I say this almost without thinking, as even now, in the vibrant summer of her life, I can't separate her image from that youthful, joyful season. She was introduced simply as "My granddaughter, Agnes Townley." It's tough to see beauty through someone else's eyes, and in this case, I know I’ll fail miserably at capturing on this blank page even a hint of the fresh loveliness, the blooming beauty of that young girl. I can only say that her perfectly Grecian head, adorned with wavy bands of bright hair shimmering with golden light, reminded me vividly of Raphael's halo-tinted portraits of the Virgin—except that where the painting showed holy calm and resignation, Agnes Townley radiated sparkling youth and life that irresistibly invoked the freshness and scent of a cloudless, rosy May morning—even in the hustle and brightness of a packed ballroom or theater. And even more captivating than her physical beauty, her sweet disposition and gentle nature shone through in every line of her face and in every note of her soft, silvery voice that seemed made for smiling.

Let me own, that I was greatly struck by so remarkable a combination of rare endowments; and this, I think, the sharp-eyed rector must have perceived, or he might not, perhaps, have been so immediately communicative with respect to the near prospects of his idolized grand-child, as he was the moment the young lady, after presiding at the breakfast-table, had withdrawn.

Let me acknowledge that I was really impressed by such a remarkable mix of unique qualities; and I think the observant rector must have noticed this, or else he might not have been so quick to share information about the future plans of his cherished granddaughter, as he was the moment the young lady left after hosting the breakfast table.

"We shall have gay doings, Mr. Tyrrel, at the rectory shortly," he said. "Next Monday three weeks will, with the blessing of God, be Agnes Townley's wedding-day."

"We're going to have a great time, Mr. Tyrrel, at the rectory soon," he said. "In three weeks from next Monday, God willing, will be Agnes Townley's wedding day."

"Wedding-day!"

"Wedding day!"

"Yes," rejoined the rector, turning toward and examining some flowers which Miss Townley had brought in and placed on the table. "Yes, it has been for some time settled that Agnes shall on that day be united in holy wedlock to Mr. Arbuthnot."

"Yeah," replied the rector, turning to look at the flowers that Miss Townley had brought in and put on the table. "Yeah, it's been decided for a while that Agnes will get married to Mr. Arbuthnot on that day."

"Mr. Arbuthnot, of Elm Park?"

"Mr. Arbuthnot from Elm Park?"

"A great match, is it not, in a worldly point of view?" replied Mr. Townley, with a pleasant smile at the tone of my exclamation. "And much better than that: Robert Arbuthnot is a young man of a high and noble nature, as well as devotedly attached to Agnes. He will, I doubt not, prove in every respect a husband deserving[Pg 197] and worthy of her; and that from the lips of a doting old grandpapa must be esteemed high praise. You will see him presently."

"A great match, isn't it, from a worldly perspective?" replied Mr. Townley, smiling pleasantly at the tone of my comment. "And even better than that: Robert Arbuthnot is a young man with a high and noble character, and he's completely devoted to Agnes. I have no doubt he'll be a husband who deserves and is worthy of her; and coming from a doting old grandpa, that’s high praise. You'll meet him shortly."

I did see him often, and quite agreed in the rector's estimate of his future grandson-in-law. I have not frequently seen a finer-looking young man—his age was twenty-six; and certainly one of a more honorable and kindly spirit, of a more genial temper than he, has never come within my observation. He had drawn a great prize in the matrimonial lottery, and, I felt, deserved his high fortune.

I saw him often and completely agreed with the rector's opinion of his future grandson-in-law. I haven't seen many finer-looking young men—he was twenty-six years old; and honestly, I've never encountered someone with a more honorable and kind spirit, or a more pleasant demeanor than him. He had hit the jackpot in the marriage lottery, and I felt he truly deserved his great luck.

They were married at the time agreed upon, and the day was kept not only at Elm Park, and in its neighborhood, but throughout "our" parish, as a general holiday. And, strangely enough—at least I have never met with another instance of the kind—it was held by our entire female community, high as well as low, that the match was a perfectly equal one, notwithstanding that wealth and high worldly position were entirely on the bridegroom's side. In fact, that nobody less in the social scale than the representative of an old territorial family ought, in the nature of things, to have aspired to the hand of Agnes Townley, appeared to have been a foregone conclusion with every body. This will give the reader a truer and more vivid impression of the bride, than any words or colors I might use.

They got married on the agreed date, and the celebration happened not just at Elm Park and its nearby areas, but throughout "our" parish, like a community holiday. Interestingly enough—at least I’ve never encountered another example like this—everyone in our entire female community, from high status to low, believed that the match was perfectly equal, even though all the wealth and social standing were on the groom's side. In fact, it seemed to be a given that no one lower in social rank than a representative of an old landowning family should have even dared to pursue Agnes Townley. This gives the reader a clearer and more vivid picture of the bride than any words or descriptions I could provide.

The days, weeks, months of wedded life flew over Mr. and Mrs. Arbuthnot without a cloud, save a few dark but transitory ones which I saw now and then flit over the husband's countenance as the time when he should become a father drew near, and came to be more and more spoken of. "I should not survive her," said Mr. Arbuthnot, one day in reply to a chance observation of the rector's, "nor indeed desire to do so." The gray-headed man seized and warmly pressed the husband's hand, and tears of sympathy filled his eyes; yet did he, nevertheless, as in duty bound, utter grave words on the sinfulness of despair under any circumstances, and the duty, in all trials, however heavy, of patient submission to the will of God. But the venerable gentleman spoke in a hoarse and broken voice, and it was easy to see he felt with Mr. Arbuthnot that the reality of an event, the bare possibility of which shook them so terribly, were a cross too heavy for human strength to bear and live.

The days, weeks, and months of married life passed by for Mr. and Mrs. Arbuthnot without any major issues, except for a few fleeting dark moments that would occasionally cross the husband's face as the time for him to become a father approached and was discussed more often. "I wouldn’t survive her," Mr. Arbuthnot said one day in response to a casual comment from the rector, "nor would I want to." The gray-haired man took the husband's hand and held it tightly, his eyes filling with tears of sympathy; yet, he still felt obligated to share serious words about the sinfulness of despair in any situation and the need to accept God's will patiently, no matter how difficult the trials. However, the elderly gentleman spoke in a hoarse, trembling voice, and it was clear he understood with Mr. Arbuthnot that the reality of an event, the mere possibility of which affected them so deeply, was a burden too heavy for human strength to endure and live through.

It was of course decided that the expected heir or heiress should be intrusted to a wet-nurse, and a Mrs. Danby, the wife of a miller living not very far from the rectory, was engaged for that purpose. I had frequently seen the woman; and her name, as the rector and I were one evening gossiping over our tea, on some subject or other that I forgot, came up.

It was decided that the expected heir or heiress should be cared for by a wet-nurse, and Mrs. Danby, the wife of a miller living not too far from the rectory, was hired for that job. I had seen her often, and her name came up one evening while the rector and I were chatting over tea about some topic I can’t remember.

"A likely person," I remarked; "healthy, very good-looking, and one might make oath, a true-hearted creature. But there is withal a timidity; a frightenedness in her manner at times, which, if I may hazard a perhaps uncharitable conjecture, speaks ill for that smart husband of hers."

"A likely person," I said; "healthy, very good-looking, and you could swear she's a genuinely good person. But there's also a shyness; a nervousness in her behavior at times, which, if I can take a possibly unkind guess, doesn't reflect well on that sharp husband of hers."

"You have hit the mark precisely, my dear sir. Danby is a sorry fellow, and a domestic tyrant to boot. His wife, who is really a good, but meek-hearted person, lived with us once. How old do you suppose her to be?"

"You've hit the nail on the head, my dear sir. Danby is a pathetic guy and a real domestic bully. His wife, who is genuinely a good but timid person, used to live with us. How old do you think she is?"

"Five-and-twenty perhaps."

"Twenty-five maybe."

"Six years more than that. She has a son of the name of Harper by a former marriage, who is in his tenth year. Anne wasn't a widow long. Danby was caught by her good looks, and she by the bait of a well-provided home. Unless, however, her husband gives up his corn speculations, she will not, I think, have that much longer."

"Six years more than that. She has a son named Harper from a previous marriage who is ten years old. Anne wasn't a widow for long. Danby was attracted to her good looks, and she was drawn in by the promise of a comfortable home. However, unless her husband stops his corn investments, I don't think she will have that much longer."

"Corn speculations! Surely Danby has no means adequate to indulgence in such a game as that?"

"Corn speculation! Surely Danby can't afford to get involved in something like that?"

"Not he. But about two years ago he bought, on credit, I believe, a considerable quantity of wheat, and prices happening to fly suddenly up just then, he made a large profit. This has quite turned his head, which, by-the-by, was never, as Cockneys say, quite rightly screwed on." The announcement of a visitor interrupted any thing further the rector might have had to say, and I soon afterward went home.

"Not him. But about two years ago, I think he bought a pretty big amount of wheat on credit, and since prices jumped up suddenly at that time, he made a large profit. This has really gone to his head, which, by the way, was never, as the Cockneys say, quite right to begin with." The announcement of a visitor interrupted whatever else the rector might have wanted to say, and I soon after went home.

A sad accident occurred about a month subsequent to the foregoing conversation. The rector was out riding upon a usually quiet horse, which all at once took it into its head to shy at a scarecrow it must have seen a score of times, and thereby threw its rider. Help was fortunately at hand, and the reverend gentleman was instantly conveyed home, when it was found that his left thigh was broken. Thanks, however, to his temperate habits, it was before long authoritatively pronounced that, although it would be a considerable time before he was released from confinement, it was not probable that the lusty winter of his life would be shortened by what had happened. Unfortunately, the accident threatened to have evil consequences in another quarter. Immediately after it occurred, one Matthews, a busy, thick-headed lout of a butcher, rode furiously off to Elm Park with the news. Mrs. Arbuthnot, who daily looked to be confined, was walking with her husband upon the lawn in front of the house, when the great burly blockhead rode up, and blurted out that the rector had been thrown from his horse, and it was feared killed!

A sad accident happened about a month after the previous conversation. The rector was out riding a usually calm horse, which suddenly got spooked by a scarecrow it must have seen countless times and threw its rider. Luckily, help was nearby, and the reverend gentleman was quickly taken home, where it was discovered that his left thigh was broken. However, thanks to his healthy lifestyle, it was soon officially stated that although it would be quite some time before he could leave the house, it was unlikely that this accident would shorten his life. Unfortunately, the accident led to trouble in another situation. Right after it happened, a loud, thick-headed butcher named Matthews rode off at top speed to Elm Park with the news. Mrs. Arbuthnot, who was expecting to give birth any day, was walking with her husband on the lawn in front of the house when the large, foolish man rode up and blurted out that the rector had been thrown from his horse and was feared dead!

The shock of such an announcement was of course overwhelming. A few hours afterward, Mrs. Arbuthnot gave birth to a healthy male-child; but the young mother's life, assailed by fever, was for many days utterly despaired of—for weeks held to tremble so evenly in the balance, that the slightest adverse circumstance might in a moment turn the scale deathward. At length the black horizon that seemed to encompass us so hopelessly, lightened, and afforded the lover-husband a glimpse and hope of his vanished and well-nigh despaired of Eden. The promise was fulfilled. I was in the library with Mr. Arbuthnot, awaiting the physician's morning report, very anxiously expected at the rectory, when[Pg 199] Dr. Lindley entered the apartment in evidently cheerful mood.

The shock of such news was obviously overwhelming. A few hours later, Mrs. Arbuthnot gave birth to a healthy baby boy; however, the young mother's life, threatened by fever, was desperate for many days—for weeks, it hung so precariously in the balance that even the slightest negative turn could tip it towards death. At last, the dark clouds that seemed to surround us so hopelessly began to lift, offering the loving husband a glimpse of hope for his lost and almost hopeless Eden. The promise was fulfilled. I was in the library with Mr. Arbuthnot, waiting for the morning report from the doctor, which was eagerly anticipated at the rectory, when[Pg 199] Dr. Lindley walked into the room with a clearly cheerful demeanor.

"You have been causelessly alarmed," he said. "There is no fear whatever of a relapse. Weakness only remains, and that we shall slowly, perhaps, but certainly remove."

"You've been unnecessarily worried," he said. "There's no reason to fear a relapse. Only weakness remains, and we'll slowly, but surely, get rid of that."

A gleam of lightning seemed to flash over Mr. Arbuthnot's expressive countenance. "Blessed be God!" he exclaimed. "And how," he added, "shall we manage respecting the child? She asks for it incessantly."

A flash of lightning seemed to light up Mr. Arbuthnot's expressive face. "Thank God!" he exclaimed. "And how," he added, "are we going to handle the situation with the child? She keeps asking for it nonstop."

Mr. Arbuthnot's infant son, I should state, had been consigned immediately after its birth to the care of Mrs. Danby, who had herself been confined, also with a boy, about a fortnight previously. Scarlatina being prevalent in the neighborhood, Mrs. Danby was hurried away with the two children to a place near Bath, almost before she was able to bear the journey. Mr. Arbuthnot had not left his wife for an hour, and consequently had only seen his child for a few minutes just after it was born.

Mr. Arbuthnot's newborn son had been placed right after birth into the care of Mrs. Danby, who had also just given birth to a boy about two weeks earlier. With scarlet fever spreading in the area, Mrs. Danby was rushed away with both children to a location near Bath, almost before she could handle the trip. Mr. Arbuthnot hadn’t left his wife for even an hour, so he had only seen his child for a few minutes right after the birth.

"With respect to the child," replied Dr. Lindley, "I am of opinion that Mrs. Arbuthnot may see it in a day or two. Say the third day from this, if all goes well. I think we may venture so far; but I will be present, for any untoward agitation might be perhaps instantly fatal." This point provisionally settled, we all three went our several ways: I to cheer the still suffering rector with the good news.

"Regarding the child," Dr. Lindley replied, "I believe Mrs. Arbuthnot can see it in a day or two. Let's say the third day from now, if everything goes well. I think we can take that step, but I'll be there, as any unexpected distress could be immediately dangerous." With that point tentatively agreed upon, the three of us went our separate ways: I went to lift the spirits of the still suffering rector with the good news.

The next day but one, Mr. Arbuthnot was in exuberant spirits. "Dr. Lindley's report is even more favorable than we had anticipated," he said; "and I start to-morrow morning, to bring Mrs. Danby and the child—" The postman's subdued but unmistakable knock interrupted him. "The nurse," he added, "is very attentive and punctual. She writes almost every day." A servant entered with a salver heaped with letters. Mr. Arbuthnot tossed them over eagerly, and seizing one, after glancing at the post-mark, tore it eagerly open, muttering as he did so, "It is not the usual handwriting; but from her, no doubt—" "Merciful God!" I impulsively exclaimed, as I suddenly lifted my eyes to his. "What is the matter?" A mortal pallor had spread over Mr. Arbuthnot's before animated features, and he was glaring at the letter in his hand as if a basilisk had suddenly confronted him. Another moment, and the muscles of his frame appeared to give way suddenly, and he dropped heavily into the easy-chair from which he had risen to take the letters. I was terribly alarmed, and first loosening his neckerchief, for he seemed choking, I said: "Let me call some one;" and I turned to reach the bell, when he instantly seized my arms, and held me with a grip of iron. "No—no—no!" he hoarsely gasped; "water—water!" There was fortunately some on a side table. I handed it to him, and he drank eagerly. It appeared to revive him a little. He thrust the crumpled letter into his pocket, and said in a low, quick whisper: "There is some one coming! Not a word, remember—not a word!" At the same time, he wheeled his[Pg 200] chair half round, so that his back should be toward the servant we heard approaching.

The day after tomorrow, Mr. Arbuthnot was in high spirits. "Dr. Lindley's report is even better than we expected," he said; "and I’m leaving tomorrow morning to bring Mrs. Danby and the child—" He was interrupted by the postman's soft but unmistakable knock. "The nurse," he added, "is very attentive and on time. She writes almost every day." A servant came in with a tray piled high with letters. Mr. Arbuthnot eagerly tossed them aside, and grabbing one, after checking the postmark, tore it open, muttering as he did, "It's not the usual handwriting; but it's from her, no doubt—" "Oh my God!" I blurted out, lifting my eyes to his. "What’s wrong?" A deathly pallor had spread across Mr. Arbuthnot's once animated face, and he was staring at the letter in his hand as if a monster had suddenly shown up. In another moment, his muscles seemed to give way, and he collapsed heavily into the armchair he had just risen from to take the letters. I was seriously alarmed, and after loosening his neckerchief as he seemed to be choking, I said, "Let me get someone;" and I turned to reach for the bell when he immediately grabbed my arms with a grip like iron. "No—no—no!" he gasped hoarsely; "water—water!" Luckily, there was some on a side table. I handed it to him, and he drank eagerly. It seemed to revive him a little. He shoved the crumpled letter into his pocket and said urgently in a low whisper, "Someone's coming! Not a word, remember—not a word!" At the same time, he turned his chair slightly so that his back would be towards the servant we heard coming.

"I am sent, sir," said Mrs. Arbuthnot's maid, "to ask if the post has arrived?"

"I've been sent, sir," said Mrs. Arbuthnot's maid, "to see if the mail has come?"

"Yes," replied Mr. Arbuthnot, with wonderful mastery of his voice. "Tell your mistress I shall be with her almost immediately, and that her—her son is quite well."

"Yes," Mr. Arbuthnot replied, skillfully controlling his voice. "Tell your boss I'll be with her shortly, and that her—her son is doing fine."

"Mr. Tyrrel," he continued, as soon as the servant was out of hearing, "there is, I think a liqueur-stand on the sideboard in the large dining-room. Would you have the kindness to bring it me, unobserved—mind that—unobserved by any one?"

"Mr. Tyrrel," he continued, once the servant was out of earshot, "I believe there's a liqueur stand on the sideboard in the big dining room. Would you be kind enough to bring it to me quietly—make sure it's unobserved by anyone?"

I did as he requested; and the instant I placed the liqueur-frame before him, he seized the brandy carafe, and drank with fierce eagerness. "For goodness' sake," I exclaimed, "consider what you are about, Mr. Arbuthnot; you will make yourself ill."

I did what he asked; and as soon as I set the liqueur tray in front of him, he grabbed the brandy carafe and drank it down eagerly. "For goodness' sake," I exclaimed, "think about what you're doing, Mr. Arbuthnot; you're going to make yourself sick."

"No, no," he answered, after finishing his draught. "It seems scarcely stronger than water. But I—I am better now. It was a sudden spasm of the heart; that's all. The letter," he added, after a long and painful pause, during which he eyed me, I thought, with a kind of suspicion—"the letter you saw me open just now, comes from a relative, an aunt, who is ill, very ill, and wishes to see me instantly. You understand?"

"No, no," he replied after finishing his drink. "It hardly feels stronger than water. But I—I feel better now. It was just a sudden pain in my heart; that's all. The letter," he continued after a long and tense pause, during which I felt like he was looking at me with suspicion—"the letter you saw me open just now is from a relative, an aunt, who is very sick and wants to see me right away. Do you understand?"

I did understand, or at least I feared that I did too well. I, however, bowed acquiescence; and he presently rose from his chair, and strode about the apartment in great agitation, until his wife's bedroom bell rang. He then stopped suddenly short, shook himself, and looked anxiously at the reflection of his flushed and varying countenance in the magnificent chimney-glass.

I did understand, or at least I worried that I did too well. I, however, nodded in agreement; and he quickly got up from his chair and started pacing around the room in a state of great agitation, until his wife's bedroom bell rang. He then suddenly stopped, shook himself, and looked anxiously at the reflection of his flushed and changing face in the beautiful mirror above the fireplace.

"I do not look, I think—or, at least shall not, in a darkened room—odder, more out of the way—that is, more agitated—than one might, that one must appear after hearing of the dangerous illness of—of—an aunt?"

"I don’t look, I guess—or at least I won’t, in a darkened room—stranger, more out of place—that is, more upset—than you might, than one has to look after hearing about the serious illness of—of—an aunt?"

"You look better, sir, than you did a while since."

"You look better, sir, than you did a while ago."

"Yes, yes; much better, much better. I am glad to hear you say so. That was my wife's bell. She is anxious, no doubt, to see me."

"Yeah, definitely; much better, much better. I’m glad to hear you say that. That was my wife’s bell. She’s probably eager to see me."

He left the apartment; was gone perhaps ten minutes; and when he returned, was a thought less nervous than before. I rose to go. "Give my respects," he said, "to the good rector; and as an especial favor," he added, with strong emphasis, "let me ask of you not to mention to a living soul that you saw me so unmanned as I was just now; that I swallowed brandy. It would appear so strange, so weak, so ridiculous."

He left the apartment and was gone for about ten minutes. When he came back, he seemed a little less nervous than before. I stood up to leave. "Please send my regards to the good rector," he said, "and as a special favor," he added with strong emphasis, "don't mention to anyone that you saw me so unsteady just now or that I drank brandy. It would seem so strange, so weak, so ridiculous."

I promised not to do so, and almost immediately left the house, very painfully affected. His son was, I concluded, either dead or dying, and he was thus bewilderedly casting about for means of keeping the terrible, perhaps fatal tidings, from his wife. I afterward heard that he left Elm Park in a post-chaise, about two hours after I came away, unattended by a single servant!

I promised I wouldn’t, and almost immediately left the house, feeling very upset. I figured his son was either dead or dying, and he was desperately trying to find ways to keep the awful, possibly deadly news from his wife. Later, I heard that he left Elm Park in a carriage about two hours after I left, without a single servant with him!

He was gone three clear days only, at the end of which he returned with Mrs. Danby and—his[Pg 201] son—in florid health, too, and one of the finest babies of its age—about nine weeks only—I had ever seen. Thus vanished the air-drawn Doubting Castle and Giant Despair which I had so hastily conjured up! The cause assigned by Mr. Arbuthnot for the agitation I had witnessed, was doubtless the true one; and yet, and the thought haunted me for months, years afterward, he opened only one letter that morning, and had sent a message to his wife that the child was well.

He was gone for just three days, and when he came back, he brought Mrs. Danby and—his[Pg 201] son—who was also in great health, and honestly one of the cutest babies I had ever seen—only about nine weeks old. Just like that, the imaginary Doubting Castle and Giant Despair that I had created in my mind disappeared! The reason Mr. Arbuthnot gave for the distress I had observed was probably the real reason; still, it bothered me for months, even years later, that he only opened one letter that morning and had sent a message to his wife saying the baby was fine.

Mrs. Danby remained at the Park till the little Robert was weaned, and was then dismissed very munificently rewarded. Year after year rolled away without bringing Mr. and Mrs. Arbuthnot any additional little ones, and no one, therefore, could feel surprised at the enthusiastic love of the delighted mother for her handsome, nobly-promising boy. But that which did astonish me, though no one else, for it seemed that I alone noticed it, was a strange defect of character which began to develop itself in Mr. Arbuthnot. He was positively jealous of his wife's affection for their own child! Many and many a time have I remarked, when he thought himself unobserved, an expression of intense pain flash from his fine, expressive eyes, at any more than usually fervent manifestation of the young mother's gushing love for her first and only born! It was altogether a mystery to me, and I as much as possible forbore to dwell upon the subject.

Mrs. Danby stayed at the Park until little Robert was weaned, and then she was let go with a generous reward. Year after year passed without Mr. and Mrs. Arbuthnot having any more children, so no one was surprised by the enthusiastic love of the delighted mother for her handsome, promising boy. But what surprised me, even though no one else seemed to notice, was a strange flaw in Mr. Arbuthnot's character that started to show. He was actually jealous of his wife’s affection for their own child! Time and again, I saw, when he thought no one was watching, a look of intense pain flash across his fine, expressive eyes at any unusually passionate display of the young mother’s overflowing love for her first and only child! It was completely a mystery to me, and I did my best to avoid thinking about it.

Nine years passed away without bringing any material change to the parties involved in this narrative, except those which time brings ordinarily in his train. Young Robert Arbuthnot was a healthy, tall, fine-looking lad of his age; and his great-grandpapa, the rector, though not suffering under any actual physical or mental infirmity, had reached a time of life when the announcement that the golden bowl is broken, or the silver cord is loosed, may indeed be quick and sudden, but scarcely unexpected. Things had gone well, too, with the nurse, Mrs. Danby, and her husband; well, at least, after a fashion. The speculative miller must have made good use of the gift to his wife for her care of little Arbuthnot, for he had built a genteel house near the mill, always rode a valuable horse, kept, it was said, a capital table; and all this, as it seemed, by his clever speculations in corn and flour, for the ordinary business of the mill was almost entirely neglected. He had no children of his own, but he had apparently taken, with much cordiality, to his step-son, a fine lad, now about eighteen years of age. This greatly grieved the boy's mother, who dreaded above all things that her son should contract the evil, dissolute habits of his father-in-law. Latterly, she had become extremely solicitous to procure the lad a permanent situation abroad, and this Mr. Arbuthnot had promised should be effected at the earliest opportunity.

Nine years went by without bringing any real change to the people in this story, other than what time usually brings. Young Robert Arbuthnot was a healthy, tall, good-looking boy for his age; and his great-grandfather, the rector, though not suffering from any specific physical or mental issues, had reached an age when the news of a passing can come quickly and unexpectedly, but is rarely a surprise. Things had been going well for the nurse, Mrs. Danby, and her husband; at least, in their own way. The enterprising miller must have made good use of the gift given to his wife for taking care of little Arbuthnot, because he built a nice house near the mill, always rode a valuable horse, and was said to host a great table; and all this seemed to come from his smart investments in grain and flour, as the regular business of the mill was almost completely overlooked. He had no children of his own, but he had apparently taken quite a liking to his step-son, a fine young man now about eighteen years old. This greatly upset the boy's mother, who was especially worried that her son would pick up the bad, irresponsible habits of his father-in-law. Recently, she had become very eager to find the boy a stable position abroad, and Mr. Arbuthnot had promised to make it happen at the earliest opportunity.

Thus stood affairs on the 16th of October, 1846. Mr Arbuthnot was temporarily absent in Ireland, where he possessed large property, and was making personal inquiries as to the extent of the[Pg 202] potato-rot, not long before announced. The morning's post had brought a letter to his wife, with the intelligence that he should reach home that very evening; and as the rectory was on the direct road to Elm Park, and her husband would be sure to pull up there, Mrs. Arbuthnot came with her son to pass the afternoon there, and in some slight degree anticipate her husband's arrival.

Thus stood affairs on the 16th of October, 1846. Mr. Arbuthnot was temporarily away in Ireland, where he owned a large property, and he was making personal inquiries about the extent of the[Pg 202] potato blight that had been reported recently. The morning's mail had brought a letter to his wife, informing her that he would be home that very evening; and since the rectory was on the direct route to Elm Park, and her husband was sure to stop there, Mrs. Arbuthnot came with her son to spend the afternoon there and mildly anticipate her husband's arrival.

About three o'clock, a chief-clerk of one of the Taunton banks rode up in a gig to the rectory, and asked to see the Rev. Mr. Townley, on pressing and important business. He was ushered into the library, where the rector and I were at the moment rather busily engaged. The clerk said he had been to Elm Park, but not finding either Mr. Arbuthnot or his lady there, he had thought that perhaps the Rev. Mr. Townley might be able to pronounce upon the genuineness of a check for £300, purporting to be drawn on the Taunton Bank by Mr. Arbuthnot, and which Danby the miller had obtained cash for at Bath. He further added, that the bank had refused payment and detained the check, believing it to be a forgery.

Around three o'clock, a chief clerk from one of the Taunton banks drove up to the rectory in a gig and requested to see Rev. Mr. Townley regarding urgent and important business. He was shown into the library, where the rector and I were quite busy at that moment. The clerk mentioned that he had been to Elm Park, but since he didn't find either Mr. Arbuthnot or his wife there, he thought that perhaps Rev. Mr. Townley could verify the authenticity of a check for £300, which was supposedly drawn on the Taunton Bank by Mr. Arbuthnot, and which Danby the miller had cashed in Bath. He also added that the bank had refused to pay it and held onto the check, suspecting it to be a forgery.

"A forgery!" exclaimed the rector, after merely glancing at the document. "No question that it is, and a very clumsily executed one, too. Besides, Mr. Arbuthnot is not yet returned from Ireland."

"A forgery!" shouted the rector, after just a quick look at the document. "There's no doubt about it, and it's a really poorly done one, too. Besides, Mr. Arbuthnot hasn't come back from Ireland yet."

This was sufficient; and the messenger, with many apologies for his intrusion, withdrew, and hastened back to Taunton. We were still talking over this sad affair, although some hours had elapsed since the clerk's departure—in fact, candles had been brought in, and we were every moment expecting Mr. Arbuthnot—when the sound of a horse at a hasty gallop was heard approaching, and presently the pale and haggard face of Danby shot by the window at which the rector and myself were standing. The gate-bell was rung almost immediately afterward, and but a brief interval passed before "Mr. Danby" was announced to be in waiting. The servant had hardly gained the passage with leave to show him in, when the impatient visitor rushed rudely into the room in a state of great, and it seemed angry excitement.

This was enough; the messenger, apologizing for his intrusion, left and hurried back to Taunton. We were still discussing this unfortunate situation, even though several hours had passed since the clerk left—in fact, candles had been brought in, and we were expecting Mr. Arbuthnot any moment when we heard a horse approaching at a fast gallop. Soon after, Danby's pale and haggard face flashed by the window where the rector and I were standing. The gatebell rang almost immediately, and it wasn't long before "Mr. Danby" was announced as waiting. The servant had barely reached the hallway to show him in when the impatient visitor burst into the room in a state of great, and seemingly angry, excitement.

"What, sir, is the meaning of this ill-mannered intrusion?" demanded the rector, sternly.

"What, sir, is the meaning of this rude interruption?" the rector asked sternly.

"You have pronounced the check I paid away at Bath to be a forgery; and the officers are, I am told, already at my heels. Mr. Arbuthnot, unfortunately, is not at home, and I am come, therefore, to seek shelter with you."

"You said the check I paid at Bath is a forgery, and I’m told the officers are already after me. Mr. Arbuthnot isn’t home, so I came to find safety with you."

"Shelter with me, sir!" exclaimed the indignant rector, moving, as he spoke, toward the bell. "Out of my house you shall go this instant."

"Shelter with me, sir!" the angry rector shouted, moving towards the bell as he spoke. "You will leave my house right now."

The fellow placed his hand upon the reverend gentleman's arm, and looked with his bloodshot eyes keenly in his face.

The guy put his hand on the reverend's arm and stared at him with his bloodshot eyes.

"Don't!" said Danby; "don't, for the sake of yourself and yours! Don't! I warn you; or, if you like the phrase better, don't, for the sake of me and mine."

"Don't!" said Danby; "don't, for the sake of you and your loved ones! Don't! I warn you; or, if you prefer the wording, don't, for my sake and mine."

"Yours, fellow! Your wife, whom you have so long held in cruel bondage through her fears for her son, has at last shaken off that chain. James Harper sailed two days ago from Portsmouth for Bombay. I sent her the news two hours since."

"Yours, my friend! Your wife, who you have kept in a terrible situation because of her fears for your son, has finally broken free from that hold. James Harper sailed two days ago from Portsmouth to Bombay. I sent her the news just two hours ago."

"Ha! is that indeed so?" cried Danby, with an irrepressible start of alarm. "Why, then—But no matter: here, luckily, comes Mrs. Arbuthnot and her son. All's right! She will, I know, stand bail for me, and, if need be, acknowledge the genuineness of her husband's check."

"Ha! Is that really true?" Danby exclaimed, his alarm clearly showing. "Well then—But it doesn’t matter: luckily, here comes Mrs. Arbuthnot and her son. Everything's good! I know she’ll bail me out, and if necessary, confirm that her husband’s check is legitimate."

The fellow's insolence was becoming unbearable, and I was about to seize and thrust him forcibly from the apartment, when the sound of wheels was heard outside. "Hold! one moment," he cried with fierce vehemence. "That is probably the officers: I must be brief, then, and to the purpose. Pray, madam, do not leave the room for your own sake: as for you, young sir, I command you to remain!"

The guy's arrogance was getting out of control, and I was ready to grab him and throw him out of the apartment when I heard the sound of wheels outside. "Wait! Just a moment," he shouted fiercely. "That’s probably the officers; I need to be quick and to the point. Please, ma’am, don’t leave the room for your own good: and you, young man, I command you to stay!"

"What! what does he mean?" exclaimed Mrs. Arbuthnot bewilderedly, and at the same time clasping her son—who gazed on Danby with kindled eyes, and angry boyish defiance—tightly to her side. Did the man's strange words give form and significance to some dark, shadowy, indistinct doubt that had previously haunted her at times? I judged so. The rector appeared similarly confused and shaken, and had sunk nerveless and terrified upon a sofa.

"What! What does he mean?" Mrs. Arbuthnot exclaimed, bewildered, while tightly holding her son—who looked at Danby with bright eyes and angry, defiant boyishness—close to her side. Did the man's strange words give shape and meaning to some dark, vague doubt that had occasionally haunted her? I thought so. The rector seemed just as confused and shaken, and had slumped down, weak and terrified, onto a sofa.

"You guess dimly, I see, at what I have to say," resumed Danby with a malignant sneer. "Well, hear it, then, once for all, and then, if you will, give me up to the officers. Some years ago," he continued, coldly and steadily—"some years ago, a woman, a nurse, was placed in charge of two infant children, both boys: one of these was her own; the other was the son of rich, proud parents. The woman's husband was a gay, jolly fellow, who much preferred spending money to earning it, and just then it happened that he was more than usually hard up. One afternoon, on visiting his wife, who had removed to a distance, he found that the rich man's child had sickened of the small-pox, and that there was no chance of its recovery. A letter containing the sad news was on a table, which he, the husband, took the liberty to open and read. After some reflection, suggested by what he had heard of the lady-mother's state of mind, he re-copied the letter, for the sake of embodying in it a certain suggestion. That letter was duly posted, and the next day brought the rich man almost in a state of distraction; but his chief and mastering terror was lest the mother of the already dead infant should hear, in her then precarious state, of what had happened. The tidings, he was sure, would kill her. Seeing this, the cunning husband of the nurse suggested that, for the present, his—the cunning one's—child might be taken to the lady as her own, and that the truth could be revealed when she was strong enough to bear it. The rich man fell into the artful trap, and that which the husband of the nurse had speculated upon, came to pass even[Pg 204] beyond his hopes. The lady grew to idolize her fancied child—she has, fortunately, had no other—and now, I think, it would really kill her to part with him. The rich man could not find it in his heart to undeceive his wife—every year it became more difficult, more impossible to do so; and very generously, I must say, has he paid in purse for the forbearance of the nurse's husband. Well now, then, to sum up: the nurse was Mrs. Danby; the rich, weak husband, Mr. Arbuthnot; the substituted child, that handsome boy, my son!"

"You’re starting to get the idea of what I’m about to say," continued Danby with a nasty grin. "Well, listen up, then, and after that, if you want, turn me over to the authorities. A few years back," he said, coldly and steadily—"a few years back, a nurse was put in charge of two young boys: one was hers; the other belonged to wealthy, proud parents. The nurse’s husband was a fun-loving guy who preferred spending money to making it, and at that moment, he was tighter on cash than usual. One afternoon, when he visited his wife, who had moved away, he discovered that the rich man's child had contracted smallpox and wasn't going to recover. There was a letter with the bad news lying on a table, which he, the husband, took the liberty of opening and reading. After some thought, influenced by what he knew about the mother’s state of mind, he rewrote the letter to include a particular suggestion. That letter was sent out, and the following day, the rich man showed up almost frenzied; his biggest fear was that the mother of the already deceased child would find out what happened, knowing it would surely kill her. Understanding this, the crafty husband of the nurse proposed that, for now, his child could be presented to the mother as her own, and the truth could be revealed when she was strong enough to handle it. The wealthy man fell into this clever scheme, and what the nurse’s husband had hoped for occurred even beyond what he expected. The lady came to adore her imagined child—thankfully, she has had no others—and now, I believe, it would truly crush her to lose him. The wealthy man couldn’t bring himself to tell his wife the truth—every year made it harder and harder to do so; and I must say, he has very generously compensated the nurse’s husband for his silence. So, to sum up: the nurse was Mrs. Danby; the rich, weak husband was Mr. Arbuthnot; and the child who was swapped was that handsome boy, my son!"

A wild scream from Mrs. Arbuthnot broke the dread silence which had accompanied this frightful revelation, echoed by an agonized cry, half tenderness, half rage, from her husband, who had entered the room unobserved, and now clasped her passionately in his arms. The carriage-wheels we had heard were his. It was long before I could recall with calmness the tumult, terror, and confusion of that scene. Mr Arbuthnot strove to bear his wife from the apartment, but she would not be forced away, and kept imploring with frenzied vehemence that Robert—that her boy should not be taken from her.

A wild scream from Mrs. Arbuthnot shattered the heavy silence that had followed this terrible revelation, echoed by an agonized cry, a mix of tenderness and anger, from her husband, who had entered the room unnoticed and now held her tightly in his arms. The sound of the carriage wheels we had heard was his. It took me a long time to think back on the chaos, fear, and confusion of that moment with any calmness. Mr. Arbuthnot tried to carry his wife out of the room, but she refused to be moved and kept pleading with frantic intensity that Robert—that her son—should not be taken from her.

"I have no wish to do so—far from it," said Danby, with gleeful exultation. "Only folk must be reasonable, and not threaten their friends with the hulks—"

"I don't want to do that at all—quite the opposite," said Danby, with cheerful excitement. "People just need to be reasonable and not scare their friends with the hulks—"

"Give him any thing, any thing!" broke in the unhappy lady. "O Robert! Robert!" she added with a renewed burst of hysterical grief, "how could you deceive me so?"

"Give him anything, anything!" interrupted the distressed woman. "Oh Robert! Robert!" she added with another wave of hysterical sadness, "how could you lie to me like this?"

"I have been punished, Agnes," he answered in a husky, broken voice, "for my well-intending but criminal weakness; cruelly punished by the ever-present consciousness that this discovery must one day or other be surely made. What do you want?" he after awhile added with recovering firmness, addressing Danby.

"I've been punished, Agnes," he replied in a raspy, shaky voice, "for my good intentions that turned out to be a mistake; punished harshly by the constant awareness that this truth will inevitably come to light someday. What do you want?" he eventually added with regained strength, facing Danby.

"The acknowledgment of the little bit of paper in dispute, of course; and say a genuine one to the same amount."

"The acknowledgment of the small piece of paper in question, obviously; and let's say a real one for the same amount."

"Yes, yes," exclaimed Mrs. Arbuthnot, still wildly sobbing, and holding the terrified boy still strained in her embrace, as if she feared he might be wrenched from her by force. "Any thing—pay him any thing!"

"Yes, yes," cried Mrs. Arbuthnot, still sobbing uncontrollably, holding the scared boy tightly in her arms as if she was afraid someone might take him away from her. "Anything—pay him anything!"

At this moment, chancing to look toward the door of the apartment, I saw that it was partially opened, and that Danby's wife was listening there. What might that mean? But what of helpful meaning in such a case could it have?

At that moment, I happened to glance at the door of the apartment and noticed it was slightly open, with Danby's wife listening in. What could that possibly mean? But what helpful significance could it hold in this situation?

"Be it so, love," said Mr. Arbuthnot, soothingly. "Danby, call to-morrow at the Park. And now, begone at once."

"Alright, love," Mr. Arbuthnot said gently. "Danby, come by tomorrow at the Park. Now, please leave right away."

"I was thinking," resumed the rascal with swelling audacity, "that we might as well at the same time come to some permanent arrangement upon black and white. But never mind: I can always put the screw on; unless, indeed, you get tired of the young gentleman, and in that case, I doubt not, he will prove a dutiful and affectionate son—Ah, devil! What do you here? Begone, or I'll murder you! Begone, do you hear?"

"I was thinking," the mischievous one continued with boldness, "that we might as well make a lasting agreement in writing. But never mind that: I can always apply some pressure; unless, of course, you get fed up with the young man, and in that case, I’m sure he’ll turn out to be a loyal and caring son—Ah, what are you doing here? Get out, or I'll take you down! Get out, do you hear?"

His wife had entered, and silently confronted him. "Your threats, evil man," replied the woman quietly, "have no terrors for me now. My son is beyond your reach. Oh, Mrs. Arbuthnot," she added, turning toward and addressing that lady, "believe not—"

His wife walked in and faced him without saying a word. "Your threats, wicked man," the woman said calmly, "don't scare me anymore. My son is out of your reach. Oh, Mrs. Arbuthnot," she continued, looking over at her, "don't believe—"

Her husband sprang at her with the bound of a panther. "Silence! Go home, or I'll strangle—" His own utterance was arrested by the fierce grasp of Mr. Arbuthnot, who seized him by the throat, and hurled him to the further end of the room. "Speak on, woman; and quick! quick! What have you to say?"

Her husband lunged at her like a panther. "Shut up! Go home, or I'll strangle—" His words were cut off by Mr. Arbuthnot, who grabbed him by the throat and tossed him to the other side of the room. "Go ahead, woman; and fast! What do you have to say?"

"That your son, dearest lady," she answered, throwing herself at Mrs. Arbuthnot's feet, "is as truly your own child as ever son born of woman!"

"Your son, dear lady," she said, falling to Mrs. Arbuthnot's feet, "is as much your child as any son born of a woman!"

That shout of half-fearful triumph seems even now as I write to ring in my ears! I felt that the woman's words were words of truth, but I could not see distinctly: the room whirled round, and the lights danced before my eyes, but I could hear through all the choking ecstasy of the mother, and the fury of the baffled felon.

That shout of half-fearful triumph still echoes in my ears as I write! I felt that the woman’s words were true, but I couldn’t see clearly: the room spun around me, and the lights twirled before my eyes, but I could still hear through the overwhelming joy of the mother and the rage of the frustrated criminal.

"The letter," continued Mrs. Danby, "which my husband found and opened, would have informed you, sir, of the swiftly approaching death of my child, and that yours had been carefully kept beyond the reach of contagion. The letter you received was written without my knowledge or consent. True it is that, terrified by my husband's threats, and in some measure reconciled to the wicked imposition by knowing that, after all, the right child would be in his right place, I afterward lent myself to Danby's evil purposes. But I chiefly feared for my son, whom I fully believed he would not have scrupled to make away with in revenge for my exposing his profitable fraud. I have sinned; I can hardly hope to be forgiven, but I have now told the sacred truth."

"The letter," continued Mrs. Danby, "which my husband found and opened, would have informed you, sir, about the quickly approaching death of my child, and that yours had been carefully kept safe from contamination. The letter you received was written without my knowledge or consent. It's true that, terrified by my husband's threats, and somewhat accepting the wicked trick knowing that, after all, the correct child would be in his rightful place, I later went along with Danby's harmful intentions. But I was mostly worried about my son, who I truly believed he would not hesitate to get rid of in revenge for me exposing his profitable scam. I have sinned; I can hardly expect forgiveness, but I have now told the sacred truth."

All this was uttered by the repentant woman, but at the time it was almost wholly unheard by those most interested in the statement. They only comprehended that they were saved—that the child was theirs in very truth. Great, abundant, but for the moment, bewildering joy! Mr. Arbuthnot—his beautiful young wife—her own true boy (how could she for a moment have doubted that he was her own true boy!—you might read that thought through all her tears, thickly as they fell)—the aged and half-stunned rector, while yet Mrs. Danby was speaking, were exclaiming, sobbing in each other's arms, ay, and praising God too, with broken voices and incoherent words it may be, but certainly with fervent, pious, grateful hearts.

All of this was spoken by the regretful woman, but at that moment, it was mostly ignored by those most affected by her words. They only realized that they were saved—that the child truly belonged to them. A great, overwhelming, but for now, confusing joy! Mr. Arbuthnot—his beautiful young wife—her own true son (how could she have ever doubted he was her true son!—you could see that thought through all her tears, falling heavily)—the elderly and somewhat dazed rector, while Mrs. Danby was still talking, were crying out, embracing each other, and yes, also praising God, with shaky voices and perhaps jumbled words, but definitely with passionate, grateful hearts.

When we had time to look about us, it was found that the felon had disappeared—escaped. It was well, perhaps, that he had; better, that he has not been heard of since.

When we had a moment to take a look around, it turned out that the criminal had vanished—escaped. It was probably for the best that he did; even better that he hasn't been heard from since.


PHILOSOPHY OF LAUGHTER.

From the time of King Solomon downward, laughter has been the subject of pretty general abuse. Even the laughers themselves sometimes[Pg 206] vituperate the cachinnation they indulge in, and many of them

From the time of King Solomon onward, laughter has often been criticized. Even those who laugh sometimes[Pg 206] condemn the laughter they engage in, and many of them

"Laugh in this way,
It was as if they were making fun of themselves and showing contempt for the spirit. That could be changed to laugh at anything.

The general notion is, that laughter is childish, and unworthy the gravity of adult life. Grown men, we say, have more to do than to laugh; and the wiser sort of them leave such an unseemly contortion of the muscles to babes and blockheads.

The general idea is that laughter is childish and not suitable for the seriousness of adult life. We say that grown men have more important things to do than laugh, and the more sensible among them leave such an inappropriate twisting of the muscles to babies and fools.

We have a suspicion that there is something wrong here—that the world is mistaken not only in its reasonings, but its facts. To assign laughter to an early period of life, is to go contrary to observation and experience. There is not so grave an animal in this world as the human baby. It will weep, when it has got the length of tears, by the pailful; it will clench its fists, distort its face into a hideous expression of anguish, and scream itself into convulsions. It has not yet come up to a laugh. The little savage must be educated by circumstances, and tamed by the contact of civilization, before it rises to the greater functions of its being. Nay, we have sometimes received the idea from its choked and tuneless screams, that they were imperfect attempts at laughter. It feels enjoyment as well as pain, but has only one way of expressing both.

We suspect that something's off here—that the world is wrong not just in its reasoning, but also in its facts. Saying that laughter belongs to early childhood goes against what we observe and experience. There’s no creature more serious than a human baby. It will cry, when it has enough tears, by the bucketful; it will clench its fists, twist its face into a grotesque expression of distress, and scream until it convulses. It hasn't yet reached the point of laughter. The little wild one must be shaped by its surroundings and tamed by the influence of civilization before it can embrace the greater aspects of its existence. In fact, we sometimes get the feeling from its choked and off-key screams that those might be clumsy attempts at laughter. It experiences both joy and pain, but only has one way to show either.

Then, look at the baby, when it has turned into a little boy or girl, and come up in some degree to the cachinnation. The laughter is still only rudimental: it is not genuine laughter. It expresses triumph, scorn, passion—anything but a feeling of natural amusement. It is provoked by misfortune, by bodily infirmities, by the writhings of agonized animals; and it indicates either a sense of power or a selfish feeling of exemption from suffering. The "light-hearted laugh of children!" What a mistake! Observe the gravity of their sports. They are masters or mistresses, with the care of a family upon their hands; and they take especial delight in correcting their children with severity. They are washerwomen, housemaids, cooks, soldiers, policemen, postmen; coach, horsemen, and horses, by turns; and in all these characters they scour, sweep, fry, fight, pursue, carry, whirl, ride, and are ridden, without changing a muscle.

Then, look at the baby when it has grown into a little boy or girl and has developed to some extent the ability to laugh. The laughter is still just basic; it’s not real laughter. It shows triumph, scorn, passion—anything but true amusement. It’s triggered by misfortune, by physical weaknesses, by the struggles of suffering animals; and it reflects either a sense of power or a selfish feeling of being free from suffering. The “carefree laugh of children!” What a misconception! Notice how serious their play is. They are like caretakers, with the responsibilities of a family on their shoulders, and they take special pleasure in sternly correcting their peers. They are washerwomen, maids, cooks, soldiers, police officers, postal workers; acting as coachmen, horsemen, and horses, all in turn; and in all these roles, they scrub, sweep, fry, fight, chase, carry, spin, ride, and are ridden, without changing a single expression.

At the games of the young people there is much shouting, argument, vituperation—but no laughter. A game is a serious business with a boy, and he derives from it excitement, but no amusement. If he laughs at all, it is at something quite distinct from the purpose of the sport; for instance, when one of his comrades has his nose broken by the ball, or when the feet of another make off from him on the ice, and he comes down upon his back like a thunderbolt. On such occasions, the laugh of a boy puts us in mind of the laugh of a hyæna: it is, in fact, the broken, asthmatic roar of a beast of prey.

At the youth games, there's a lot of shouting, arguing, and insults—but no laughter. For a boy, a game is serious business; he gets excitement from it, but not fun. If he does laugh, it's usually at something unrelated to the sport itself; for example, when one of his friends gets his nose broken by the ball or when another's feet slip out from under him on the ice, sending him crashing onto his back. In those moments, a boy's laugh reminds us of a hyena's: it sounds like a broken, wheezing roar of a predator.

It would thus appear that the common charge brought against laughter, of being something[Pg 207] babyish, or childish, or boyish—something properly appertaining to early life—is unfounded. But we of course must not be understood to speak of what is technically called giggling, which proceeds more from a looseness of the structures than from any sensation of amusement. Many young persons are continually on the giggle till their muscles strengthen; and indeed, when a company of them are met together, the affection aggravated by emulation, acquires the loudness of laughter, when it may be likened, in Scripture phrase, to the crackling of thorns. What we mean is a regular guffaw; that explosion of high spirits, and the feeling of joyous excitement, which is commonly written ha! ha! ha! This is altogether unknown in babyhood; in boyhood, it exists only in its rudiments; and it does not reach its full development till adolescence ripens into manhood.

It seems that the common belief that laughter is something[Pg 207] childish or immature—something that belongs to early life—is misplaced. However, we should clarify that we are not referring to what is technically called giggling, which comes more from a lack of control than from any real sense of joy. Many young people are often in a giggling phase until their muscles develop; and when a group of them gathers, this behavior, fueled by competition, can become so loud that it resembles laughter, which can be compared, in biblical terms, to the crackling of thorns. What we mean is a genuine laugh; that burst of happiness and the feeling of joyful excitement that is typically expressed as ha! ha! ha! This type of laughter is completely absent in infancy; in childhood, it only appears in basic forms; and it doesn’t fully mature until adolescence transitions into adulthood.

This train of thought was suggested to us a few evenings ago, by the conduct of a party of eight or ten individuals, who meet periodically for the purpose of philosophical inquiry. Their subject is a very grave one. Their object is to mould into a science that which as yet is only a vague, formless, and obscure department of knowledge; and they proceed in the most cautious manner from point to point, from axiom to axiom—debating at every step, and coming to no decision without unanimous conviction. Some are professors of the university, devoted to abstruse studies; some are clergymen; and some authors and artists. Now, at the meeting in question—which we take merely as an example, for all are alike—when the hour struck which terminates their proceedings for the evening, the jaded philosophers retired to the refreshment-room; and here a scene of remarkable contrast occurred. Instead of a single deep, low, earnest voice, alternating with a profound silence, an absolute roar of merriment began, with the suddenness of an explosion of gunpowder. Jests, bon-mots, anecdotes, barbarous plays upon words—the more atrocious the better—flew round the table; and a joyous and almost continuous ha! ha! ha! made the ceiling ring. This, we venture to say it, was laughter—genuine, unmistakable laughter, proceeding from no sense of triumph, from no self-gratulation, and mingled with no bad feeling of any kind. It was a spontaneous effort of nature coming from the head as well as the heart; an unbending of the bow, a reaction from study, which study alone could occasion, and which could occur only in adult life.

This idea was brought to our attention a few evenings ago by a group of around eight or ten people who meet regularly to explore philosophical questions. Their topic is quite serious. Their goal is to turn what is currently a vague, unstructured, and obscure area of knowledge into a proper science; they approach this task very carefully, moving from point to point and from one principle to another—debating every step of the way and reaching no conclusion without unanimous agreement. Some members are university professors focused on complex studies, while others are clergymen, authors, or artists. Now, at the meeting we are referencing—which we mention just as a representative example, since they are all similar—when the time came to end their discussions for the evening, the exhausted philosophers went to the refreshment room; and here an incredibly contrasting scene unfolded. Instead of a single deep, serious voice punctuated by silence, a loud burst of laughter erupted suddenly, like an explosion. Jokes, witty remarks, stories, and terrible puns—the worse, the better—flew around the table, accompanied by a joyful and nearly continuous stream of laughter that echoed off the ceiling. We confidently say that this was laughter—genuine, unmistakable laughter that came not from a sense of victory, not from self-satisfaction, and was free from any negativity. It was a natural expression of joy coming from both intellect and emotion; a release from tension, a reaction from study that only study could provoke, and that could only happen in adulthood.

There are some people who can not laugh, but these are not necessarily either morose or stupid. They may laugh in their heart, and with their eyes, although by some unlucky fatality, they have not the gift of oral cachinnation. Such persons are to be pitied; for laughter in grown people is a substitute devised by nature for the screams and shouts of boyhood, by which the lungs are strengthened and the health preserved. As the intellect ripens, that shouting ceases, and we learn to laugh as we learn to[Pg 208] reason. The society we have mentioned studied the harder the more they laughed, and they laughed the more the harder they studied. Each, of course, to be of use, must be in its own place. A laugh in the midst of the study would have been a profanation; a grave look in the midst of the merriment would have been an insult to the good sense of the company.

There are some people who can’t laugh, but that doesn’t mean they’re sad or unintelligent. They might feel joy inside and express it with their eyes, even if, by some unfortunate chance, they lack the ability to laugh out loud. Such individuals deserve our sympathy; for adults, laughter is nature's way of replacing the screams and shouts of childhood, which help strengthen the lungs and maintain health. As we grow wiser, those loud outbursts fade, and we learn to laugh just as we learn to reason. The group we mentioned found that the more they laughed, the harder they studied, and the harder they studied, the more they laughed. Each element, of course, has its proper place. A laugh during serious study would be disrespectful; a serious face during laughter would insult the group’s common sense.

If there are some people who can not laugh, there are others who will not. It is not, however, that they are ashamed of being grown men, and want to go back to babyhood, for by some extraordinary perversity, they fancy unalterable gravity to be the distinguishing characteristic of wisdom. In a merry company, they present the appearance of a Red Indian whitewashed, and look on at the strange ways of their neighbors without betraying even the faintest spark of sympathy or intelligence. These are children of a larger growth, and have not yet acquired sense enough to laugh. Like the savage, they are afraid of compromising their dignity, or, to use their own words, of making fools of themselves. For our part, we never see a man afraid of making a fool of himself at the right season, without setting him down as a fool ready made.

If some people can’t laugh, there are others who choose not to. It’s not that they’re embarrassed about being grown men or want to revert to their childhood; rather, they mistakenly believe that a serious demeanor is what defines wisdom. In a lively group, they resemble a whitewashed Native American, watching their neighbors’ antics without showing the slightest hint of sympathy or understanding. These are just big kids who haven’t learned enough to laugh. Like the primitive, they worry about losing their dignity, or in their own words, about making fools of themselves. As for us, whenever we see a man afraid to look foolish at the right time, we consider him a ready-made fool.

A woman has no natural grace more bewitching than a sweet laugh. It is like the sound of flutes on the water. It leaps from her heart in a clear, sparkling rill; and the heart that hears it feels as if bathed in the cool, exhilarating spring. Have you ever pursued an unseen fugitive through the trees, led on by her fairy laugh; now here, now there—now lost, now found? We have. And we are pursuing that wandering voice to this day. Sometimes it comes to us in the midst of care, or sorrow, or irksome business; and then we turn away, and listen, and hear it ringing through the room like a silver bell, with power to scare away the ill-spirits of the mind. How much we owe to that sweet laugh! It turns the prose of our life into poetry; it flings showers of sunshine over the darksome wood in which we are traveling; it touches with light even our sleep, which is no more the image of death, but gemmed with dreams that are the shadows of immortality.

A woman has no natural charm more captivating than a sweet laugh. It’s like the sound of flutes on the water. It springs from her heart in a clear, sparkling stream; and the heart that hears it feels refreshed, like being bathed in cool, invigorating spring water. Have you ever chased an invisible fugitive through the trees, guided by her enchanting laugh; here one moment, there the next—now hidden, now found? We have. And we’re still chasing that wandering voice to this day. Sometimes it reaches us in the midst of worry, sadness, or tedious tasks; and then we pause, listen, and hear it resonating through the room like a silver bell, capable of driving away the dark thoughts. How much we owe to that sweet laugh! It transforms the ordinary moments of our lives into poetry; it showers rays of sunshine over the gloomy woods we’re navigating; it lightens even our sleep, which becomes no longer just a reflection of death, but is filled with dreams that are glimpses of eternity.

But our song, like Dibdin's, "means more than it says;" for a man, as we have stated, may laugh, and yet the cachinnation be wanting. His heart laughs, and his eyes are filled with that kindly, sympathetic smile which inspires friendship and confidence. On the sympathy within, these external phenomena depend; and this sympathy it is which keeps societies of men together, and is the true freemasonry of the good and wise. It is an imperfect sympathy that grants only sympathetic tears: we must join in the mirth as well as melancholy of our neighbors. If our countrymen laughed more, they would not only be happier, but better, and if philanthropists would provide amusements for the people, they would be saved the trouble and expense of their fruitless war against public-houses. This is an indisputable proposition. The French and Italians, with wine growing at[Pg 209] their doors, and spirits almost as cheap as beer in England, are sober nations. How comes this? The laugh will answer that leaps up from group after group—the dance on the village-green—the family dinner under the trees—the thousand merry-meetings that invigorate industry, by serving as a relief to the business of life. Without these, business is care; and it is from care, not from amusement, men fly to the bottle.

But our song, like Dibdin's, "means more than it says;" because a man, as we’ve noted, can laugh, yet still lack true joy. His heart can be joyful, and his eyes can show that warm, understanding smile that builds friendship and trust. These external signs rely on the sympathy within; it’s this sympathy that holds communities of people together and is the real bond among the good and wise. It’s a flawed sympathy that only offers sympathetic tears: we need to share in both the joy and the sadness of our neighbors. If our fellow countrymen laughed more, they’d not only be happier but also better people, and if philanthropists would create entertainment for the public, they could avoid the hassle and cost of their futile battle against pubs. This is an undeniable point. The French and Italians, with wine available right at their doorsteps and spirits almost as cheap as beer in England, are known to be sober nations. How does this happen? The laughter that comes from group after group—the dancing on the village green—the family meals under the trees—the countless joyful gatherings that boost productivity by providing a break from the grind of life. Without these, work becomes a burden; it’s from that burden, not from joy, that people turn to drinking.

The common mistake is to associate the idea of amusement with error of every kind; and this piece of moral asceticism is given forth as true wisdom, and, from sheer want of examination, is very generally received as such. A place of amusement concentrates a crowd, and whatever excesses may be committed, being confined to a small space, stand more prominently forward than at other times. This is all. The excesses are really fewer—far fewer—in proportion to the number assembled, than if no gathering had taken place How can it be otherwise? The amusement is itself the excitement which the wearied heart longs for; it is the reaction which nature seeks; and in the comparatively few instances of a grosser intoxication being superadded, we see only the craving of depraved habit—a habit engendered, in all probability, by the want of amusement.

The common mistake is to link the idea of fun with every kind of mistake; and this piece of moral strictness is put forward as true wisdom, and, due to a lack of examination, is widely accepted as such. A place of entertainment brings together a crowd, and whatever excesses might happen, since they are confined to a small area, stand out more clearly than at other times. That’s all there is to it. The excesses are actually fewer—much fewer—in proportion to the number of people gathered than if no event had taken place. How could it be any different? The amusement itself is the excitement that a tired heart craves; it is the response that nature seeks; and in the comparatively rare cases of extreme intoxication being added, we see only the desire stemming from a corrupted habit—a habit likely created by the lack of amusement.

No, good friends, let us laugh sometimes, if you love us. A dangerous character is of another kidney, as Cæsar knew to his cost:

No, good friends, let’s laugh sometimes if you care about us. A dangerous person is different, as Cæsar learned the hard way:

"He doesn't love plays,
As you do, Antony; he doesn't hear any music;
Rarely he laughs;

and when he does, it is on the wrong side of his mouth.

and when he does, it's on the wrong side of his mouth.

Let us be wiser. Let us laugh in fitting time and place, silently or aloud, each after his nature. Let us enjoy an innocent reaction rather than a guilty one, since reaction there must be. The bow that is always bent loses its elasticity, and becomes useless.

Let’s be smarter. Let’s laugh at the right time and place, quietly or loudly, each in our own way. Let’s embrace an innocent response instead of a guilty one, since there will always be a reaction. A bow that’s always drawn loses its flexibility and becomes useless.


Monthly Current Events Report.

THE UNITED STATES.

The past month has been one of unusual activity. The proceedings of Congress have not been without importance:—political Conventions have been held, shaping to a certain extent public movements for the coming season: and numerous religious and benevolent associations, as well as ecclesiastical assemblies for business purposes, have held their annual meetings.

The past month has been really eventful. Congress has had significant proceedings: political conventions have taken place, influencing public movements for the upcoming season; and many religious and charitable organizations, along with church meetings for business purposes, have held their annual gatherings.

In the United States Senate, the debate upon an amendment to the Deficiency Bill, by which it was proposed to grant a large increase of pay annually to the Collins line of Atlantic steamers, continued for several days. On the 30th of May, Senator Rusk spoke in favor of it, and on the 6th, Senator James made an argument upon the same side. Senator Jones, of Tennessee, opposed so large a grant as that suggested, though he declared himself desirous of sustaining the line. He moved to strike out $33,000, and insert $25,000, as the increase each trip. On the 7th, Mr. Cass spoke at length in favor of the appropriation. The amendment of Mr. Jones was then rejected, by a vote of 20 to 28. Senator Brooke moved an amendment, granting the whole amount of postages received in place of all other compensation: this was rejected by 9 to 38. Mr. Rusk moved that Congress shall have the power at any time after December, 1854, to discontinue the extra allowance, on giving six months' notice. This was agreed to. Mr. Mallory moved, that the contract be transferred from the Naval to the Post Office Department: this was lost, 18 to 19. On the 13th, Senator Borland spoke in opposition to the increased grant. On the 19th, the amendment, giving the line $33,000 additional pay for each trip, was agreed to, by a vote of 23 ayes to 21 noes: and on the 21st, upon a motion to agree to this amendment, as reported by the Committee of the whole, it was decided in the affirmative by an increased vote.

In the United States Senate, the debate on an amendment to the Deficiency Bill, which proposed a significant annual pay increase for the Collins line of Atlantic steamers, went on for several days. On May 30th, Senator Rusk spoke in support of it, and on the 6th of June, Senator James made a case for the same position. Senator Jones from Tennessee opposed such a large increase, although he expressed a desire to support the line. He proposed reducing the increase from $33,000 to $25,000 for each trip. On the 7th, Mr. Cass spoke at length in favor of the funding. Mr. Jones's amendment was then rejected with a vote of 20 to 28. Senator Brooke proposed an amendment that would replace all other compensation with the total amount of postage received, but this was rejected by a vote of 9 to 38. Mr. Rusk moved that Congress should have the authority to end the extra payment at any time after December 1854 with a six-month notice, and this motion was accepted. Mr. Mallory proposed transferring the contract from the Naval Department to the Post Office Department, which failed by a vote of 18 to 19. On the 13th, Senator Borland spoke against the increased grant. On the 19th, the amendment granting the line an additional $33,000 for each trip passed with a vote of 23 in favor and 21 against. On the 21st, a motion to agree to this amendment, as reported by the Committee of the Whole, was decided in favor by a larger majority.

In the House of Representatives the only action taken, worthy of special record, was the passage, on the 12th, of the Bill granting to each head of a family, who may be a native citizen of the United States or naturalized previous to January, 1852, the right to enter upon and cultivate one quarter-section of the Public Lands, and directing the issue to him of a patent for such land after five years of actual residence and cultivation. The Bill was passed by a vote of 107 to 56.——The other debates of the House have turned so exclusively upon unimportant topics, or upon temporary matters relating to the approaching Presidential election, as to render further reference to them here unnecessary.

In the House of Representatives, the only notable action recorded was the passage, on the 12th, of a Bill that gives each head of a family, who is a native citizen of the United States or was naturalized before January 1852, the right to enter and cultivate one quarter-section of the Public Lands. It also directs that a patent for the land be issued to them after five years of actual residency and cultivation. The Bill passed with a vote of 107 to 56. The other discussions in the House have focused mainly on trivial issues or temporary matters related to the upcoming Presidential election, making any further reference to them unnecessary here.

In reply to the call of the Senate, the closing correspondence of Chevalier Hulsemann, Austrian Chargé, with the State Department, has been published. Under date of April 29, Mr. H. writes to the Secretary, stating that the time had arrived for carrying into effect the intentions of his government in regard to his official connection with that of the United States. He complains that the Secretary had not answered his communication of December 13, in regard to the public reception given to Kossuth, and that, in spite of verbal encouragements given him to expect different treatment, his movements had been derisively commented on by the public journals. He had deemed it his duty on the 21st of November, to complain of these annoyances, and on the 28th the Secretary had thereupon notified him that no further communication would be held with him except in writing. On the 7th of January, the Secretary of State had seen fit to mate a speech encouraging revolution in Hungary. This demonstration he considered so strange that he immediately inquired of the President whether it was to be considered an expression of the sentiments of the government of the United States. The Austrian government had expressed itself satisfied with the assurances given in return by the President on the 12th of April, and had instructed him no longer to continue official relations with the "principal promoter of the Kossuth episode." He closed his letter by stating that Mr. A. Belmont, Consul-general of Austria at New York, would continue in the exercise of his[Pg 210] functions. Under date of May 3, Mr. Hunter, acting Secretary of State, acknowledged the receipt of this communication, and informed Chevalier Hulsemann that, "as Mr. Belmont is well known to the Secretary of State as a gentleman of much respectability, any communication which it may be proper for him to address to the department in his official character, will be received with entire respect."

In response to the Senate's request, the final correspondence from Chevalier Hulsemann, Austrian Chargé, with the State Department has been published. Dated April 29, Mr. H. wrote to the Secretary, stating that the time had come to implement his government's intentions regarding his official relationship with the United States. He voiced his frustration that the Secretary hadn't replied to his message from December 13 about the public reception for Kossuth and that, despite verbal assurances he received for better treatment, his actions had been mocked by the media. He felt it necessary to express his concerns about these annoyances on November 21, and on the 28th, the Secretary informed him that no further communication would occur except in writing. On January 7, the Secretary of State had chosen to deliver a speech supporting revolution in Hungary. He found this so unusual that he immediately asked the President if it represented the views of the United States government. The Austrian government had stated it was content with the assurances provided by the President on April 12 and had instructed him to stop official relations with the "main promoter of the Kossuth episode." He concluded his letter by stating that Mr. A. Belmont, Consul-general of Austria at New York, would continue performing his functions. Dated May 3, Mr. Hunter, acting Secretary of State, acknowledged receiving this communication and informed Chevalier Hulsemann that, "as Mr. Belmont is well known to the Secretary of State as a gentleman of much respectability, any communication that may be appropriate for him to address to the department in his official capacity will be received with full respect."

The Democratic National Convention, for the nomination of candidates for the coming canvass, met at Baltimore on the 1st of June, and was organized by the election of Hon. John W. Davis, of Indiana, President. The number of delegates present was 288, and a rule was adopted requiring a vote of two-thirds (192) for a nomination. Unsuccessful ballotings were had for four days, and it was not until the forty-ninth ballot that General Franklin Pierce, of New Hampshire, received the nomination. Upon the forty-eighth ballot he received 55 votes, the remainder being divided among Messrs. Cass, Buchanan, Douglass, and Marcy:—upon the next trial he received 282 votes. Hon. William R. King, of Alabama, was then nominated for Vice President. A series of resolutions was adopted, rehearsing the leading principles of the Democratic party, and declaring resistance to "all attempts at renewing in Congress, or out of it, the agitation of the slavery question under whatever shape or color the attempt may be made"—and also a determination to "abide by, and adhere to, a faithful execution of the acts known as the Compromise measures settled by the last Congress—the act reclaiming fugitives from service or labor included." The Convention adjourned on the 5th.

The Democratic National Convention, which was held to nominate candidates for the upcoming election, took place in Baltimore on June 1st and was led by the election of Hon. John W. Davis from Indiana as President. There were 288 delegates in attendance, and a rule was put in place requiring a two-thirds vote (192) for a nomination. After unsuccessful voting for four days, General Franklin Pierce from New Hampshire finally secured the nomination on the forty-ninth ballot. In the forty-eighth ballot, he received 55 votes, with the remaining votes split among Messrs. Cass, Buchanan, Douglass, and Marcy; on the next round, he received 282 votes. Hon. William R. King from Alabama was then nominated for Vice President. A series of resolutions was passed outlining the key principles of the Democratic party, stating resistance to "any attempts to revive the slavery issue in Congress or elsewhere, regardless of how it is presented," and affirming a commitment to "faithfully implement the compromises established by the last Congress, including the act regarding the return of fugitives from service or labor." The Convention adjourned on the 5th.

Mr. Webster, being upon a brief visit to his place of residence, accepted an invitation of the citizens of Boston to meet them at Faneuil Hall, on the 22d of May, when he made a brief address. He spoke of the pleasure which it always gave him to meet the people of Boston—of the astonishing progress and prosperity of that city, and of the many motives her citizens had to labor strenuously for her advancement. He spoke also of the general nature and functions of government, and of the many causes which the people of this country have to reverence and cherish the institutions bequeathed to them by their fathers.

Mr. Webster, while on a short visit to his home, accepted an invitation from the citizens of Boston to meet them at Faneuil Hall on May 22nd, where he gave a brief speech. He expressed how much he always enjoyed meeting the people of Boston—talking about the incredible growth and success of the city, and the numerous reasons its citizens had to work hard for its progress. He also discussed the general purpose and role of government, and the many reasons the people of this country have to respect and value the institutions handed down to them by their forefathers.

In the State of New York, the Court of Appeals has decided against the constitutionality of the law of 1851, for the more speedy completion of the State canals. It will be recollected that the Constitution of the State directs that the surplus revenues of the Canals shall in each fiscal year be applied to these works, in such manner as the Legislature may direct; and it also forbids the contracting of any debt against the State, except by an act to be submitted to the people, and providing for a direct tax sufficient to pay the interest and redeem within eighteen years the principal of the debt thus contracted. The Bill in question provided for the issue of certificates to the amount of nine millions of dollars, to be paid exclusively out of the surplus revenues thus set apart, and stating on their face that the State was to be in no degree responsible for their redemption; and for the application of moneys that might be raised from the sale of these certificates, to the completion of the Canals. Under the law contracts had been made for the whole work, which were pronounced valid by the last Legislature. The Court of Appeals decides that the law conflicts with that clause of the Constitution which requires the application of the revenues in each fiscal year, as also with that which forbids the incurring of a debt except in the mode specified.[Pg 211] The decision was concurred in by five out of the eight judges of that Court.

In New York State, the Court of Appeals has ruled that the 1851 law meant to speed up the construction of the State canals is unconstitutional. It's important to note that the State Constitution mandates that surplus revenues from the Canals must be allocated to these projects every fiscal year, as directed by the Legislature. It also prohibits incurring any debt against the State unless an act is proposed to the people and includes a direct tax sufficient to cover interest and repay the principal within eighteen years. The law in question allowed for issuing certificates totaling nine million dollars, to be repaid solely from the designated surplus revenues, and stated that the State would not be responsible for their repayment. It also directed that funds raised from selling these certificates would go towards completing the Canals. Contracts for the entire project were made under this law and deemed valid by the last Legislature. However, the Court of Appeals concluded that the law contradicts the constitutional requirement for applying revenues each fiscal year, as well as the provision that allows debt only through the specified process.[Pg 211] Five out of the eight judges agreed with this decision.

In South Carolina the State Convention of delegates elected to take such measures as they might deem expedient against the encroachments and aggressions of the Federal Government, met at Columbia on the 29th of April. It adopted a resolution, declaring that the wrongs sustained by the State, especially in regard to slavery, amply "justify that State, so far as any duty or obligation to her confederates is involved, in dissolving at once all political connection with her co-States, and that she forbears the exercise of that manifest right of self-government, from considerations of expediency only." This resolution was accompanied by an ordinance asserting the right of secession, and declaring that for the sufficiency of the causes which may impel her to such a step, she is responsible solely to God and to the tribunal of public opinion among the nations of the earth. The resolution was adopted by a vote of 135 to 20.

In South Carolina, the State Convention of delegates chosen to take appropriate actions against the federal government's overreach met in Columbia on April 29th. They passed a resolution stating that the injustices faced by the State, particularly regarding slavery, fully "justify that State, regarding any duty or obligation to her fellow states, in terminating all political ties with her co-states right away, and that she refrains from exercising her clear right of self-government only out of considerations of practicality." This resolution was accompanied by an ordinance asserting the right to secede and stating that for the reasons that may drive her to this action, she is accountable only to God and to the court of public opinion among nations. The resolution was approved with a vote of 135 to 20.

A bill has been passed by the Legislature of Massachusetts, forbidding the sale of intoxicating liquors within the limits of the State. As originally passed, it provided for its submission to the popular vote, and was vetoed by the Governor, because it did not provide for taking that vote by secret, instead of by an open ballot. The Legislature then enacted the law without any clause submitting it to the people; and in this form it received the assent of the Governor. A similar law, has been enacted in Rhode Island.

A bill has been passed by the Massachusetts Legislature, banning the sale of alcoholic beverages within the state. Initially, it was set to be put to a public vote but was vetoed by the Governor because it didn’t allow for a secret ballot instead of an open one. The Legislature then passed the law without any provision for public voting, and in this form, it was approved by the Governor. A similar law has also been enacted in Rhode Island.

During the second week in May all the Missionary, Bible, and other benevolent associations connected with the several religious denominations having their centres of operation in the city of New York, held their anniversary celebrations in that city. They were so numerous, and their proceedings, except as given in detail, would prove so uninstructive, that it would be useless to make any extended mention of them here. They were attended with even more than the ordinary degree of public interest: very able and eloquent addresses were made by distinguished gentlemen, clergymen and others, from various parts of the country; and reports of their proceedings—of results accomplished and agencies employed—were spread before the public. The history of their labors during the year has been highly encouraging. Largely increased contributions of money have augmented their resources and their ability to prosecute their labors which have been attended with marked success.——During the week succeeding, similar meetings were held in Boston of all the associations which have their head-quarters in that city.——The two General Assemblies, which constitute the government of the two divisions of the Presbyterian Church in the United States, have held their sessions during the month. That representing the Old School met at Charleston, S.C., on the 20th of May. Rev. John C. Lord, of Buffalo, N.Y., was chosen Moderator. That of the New School met at Washington on the same day, and Rev. Dr. Adams, of New York, was elected Moderator. Both were engaged for several days in business relating to the government and organization of their respective organizations.——The General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church (North) met at Boston on the 1st of May, and held a protracted session—extending through the whole month. Most of the business transacted related of course to matters of temporary or local interest. Special reports were made and action taken upon the interests of the Church in various sections of the country, and in the fields of missionary labor. It was decided that the[Pg 212] next General Conference should meet at Indianapolis. Steps were taken to organize a Methodist Episcopal Tract Society. On the 25th of May the four new bishops were elected by ballot—Rev. Drs. Levi Scott, Matthew Simpson, Osmond C. Baker, and Edward R. Ames being chosen. Dr. T. E. Bond was elected editor of the Christian Advocate and Journal, the recognized organ of the Church; Dr. J. M'Clintock, editor of the Quarterly Review; D. P. Kidder, of the Sunday School publications; W. Nast, of the Christian Apologist; and Rev. Dr. Charles Elliott, of the Western Christian Advocate. Rev. Dr. J. P. Durbin was chosen Missionary Secretary.

During the second week of May, all the missionary, Bible, and other charitable organizations connected with various religious denominations operating in New York City held their anniversary celebrations there. There were so many of them, and their activities, except for the detailed accounts, would be so uninformative, that it would be pointless to mention them at length here. They attracted even more public interest than usual: many capable and eloquent speeches were delivered by noted individuals, clergymen, and others from different parts of the country; and reports of their activities—including accomplishments and methods—were shared with the public. The history of their work over the past year has been very encouraging. Contributions significantly increased, boosting their resources and ability to continue their efforts, which have seen notable success. During the following week, similar meetings took place in Boston for all the organizations headquartered there. The two General Assemblies, which govern the two divisions of the Presbyterian Church in the United States, held their sessions this month. The Old School assembly met in Charleston, S.C., on May 20th, where Rev. John C. Lord from Buffalo, N.Y., was elected Moderator. The New School assembly met in Washington on the same day, with Rev. Dr. Adams from New York chosen as Moderator. Both assemblies were engaged for several days in matters regarding the governance and organization of their respective groups. The General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church (North) convened in Boston on May 1st for an extended session that lasted the entire month. Most of the business discussed was related to temporary or local issues. Special reports were presented, and actions were taken concerning the Church's interests in various regions and areas of missionary work. It was decided that the next General Conference would be held in Indianapolis. Plans were made to establish a Methodist Episcopal Tract Society. On May 25th, four new bishops were elected by ballot—Rev. Drs. Levi Scott, Matthew Simpson, Osmond C. Baker, and Edward R. Ames. Dr. T. E. Bond was appointed editor of the Christian Advocate and Journal, the official publication of the Church; Dr. J. M'Clintock was appointed editor of the Quarterly Review; D. P. Kidder oversaw the Sunday School publications; W. Nast took charge of the Christian Apologist; and Rev. Dr. Charles Elliott led the Western Christian Advocate. Rev. Dr. J. P. Durbin was selected as Missionary Secretary.

Kossuth, after visiting the principal towns in Massachusetts, had a public reception at Albany, and spent a week in visiting Buffalo, Niagara, Syracuse, Troy, and other cities. He was expected at New York when our Record closed.——Thomas Francis Meagher, Esq., one of the Irish State prisoners, effected his escape from Van Dieman's Land in February, and arrived, in an American vessel, at New York on the 1st of June. He was very warmly welcomed by the public, especially by his countrymen.

Kossuth, after visiting the main towns in Massachusetts, had a public reception in Albany and spent a week visiting Buffalo, Niagara, Syracuse, Troy, and other cities. He was expected in New York when our Record closed.——Thomas Francis Meagher, Esq., one of the Irish State prisoners, escaped from Van Dieman's Land in February and arrived, on an American ship, in New York on June 1st. He was warmly welcomed by the public, especially by his fellow countrymen.

From California we have intelligence to the 6th of May. The total shipments of gold for April were $3,419,817; for March, $2,549,704. Great numbers of Chinese continued to arrive, and they had become so numerous in the country as to excite serious disaffection, and to lead to various propositions for their exclusion. The Governor sent in a special message to the Legislature, urging the necessity of restricting emigration from China, to enhance the prosperity and preserve the tranquillity of the State. He objects especially to those who come under contracts for a limited time—returning to China with the products of their labor after their term is out, and adding nothing to the resources or industry of the country. He says that they are not good American citizens, and can not be; and that their immigration is not desirable. By a reference to statistics he shows that China can pour in upon our coast millions of her population without feeling their loss; that they live upon the merest pittance; and that while they spend comparatively nothing in the country, the tendency of their presence is to create an unhealthy competition with our own people, and reduce the price of labor far below our American living standard. Governor Bigler also expresses a doubt, whether the Celestials are entitled to the benefit of the naturalization laws. He proposes as a remedy—1st. Such an exercise of the taxing power by the State as will check the present system of indiscriminate and unlimited Asiatic emigration. 2d. A demand by the State of California for the prompt interposition of Congress, by the passage of an Act prohibiting "Coolies," shipped to California under contracts, from laboring in the mines of this State. Measures have been taken in several of the mining localities to exclude the Chinese from them.——The Legislature adjourned on the 4th; the bill proposing a Convention to revise the Constitution of the State was defeated in the Senate by a vote of 11 to 9.——Serious Indian difficulties have occurred again in the interior. In Trinity County a company of armed citizens went in pursuit of a band of Indians who were supposed to have been concerned in the murder of one of their fellow-citizens. On the 22d of April they overtook them, encamped on the south fork of Trinity river, and taking them by surprise, shot not less than a hundred and fifty of them in cold blood. Men, women, and children were alike destroyed.——Accounts of murders, accidents, &c., abound. The accounts from the mining districts continue to be encouraging.

From California, we have news up to May 6th. The total gold shipments for April were $3,419,817; for March, $2,549,704. Many Chinese continued to arrive, and their growing numbers sparked serious discontent, leading to various proposals for their exclusion. The Governor sent a special message to the Legislature, highlighting the need to limit immigration from China to improve the state's prosperity and maintain peace. He particularly objects to those who come under temporary contracts—returning to China with the profits of their labor after their term ends, contributing nothing to the country's resources or workforce. He argues that they aren't good American citizens and cannot be, and that their immigration is undesirable. By referencing statistics, he illustrates that China can send millions of its people to our coast without feeling the loss; they survive on very little, and while they spend relatively nothing in the country, their presence tends to create unhealthy competition with our own citizens and drive down wages far below the American living standard. Governor Bigler also questions whether the Chinese are entitled to the benefits of naturalization laws. He suggests two remedies: 1. Use the state's taxing power to curb the current trend of unrestricted Asian immigration. 2. A call for California to urge Congress to pass a law banning "Coolies" brought to California under contracts from working in the mines of this state. Some mining areas have already taken steps to exclude Chinese immigrants.——The Legislature adjourned on the 4th; the bill for a Convention to revise the State Constitution was defeated in the Senate by a vote of 11 to 9.——There have been serious issues with Native Americans again in the interior. In Trinity County, a group of armed citizens pursued a band of Indians thought to be involved in the murder of one of their own. On April 22nd, they caught up with them, camped on the south fork of the Trinity River, and took them by surprise, killing at least one hundred and fifty in cold blood. Men, women, and children were all killed.——Reports of murders, accidents, etc., are widespread. Reports from the mining districts remain positive.

From the Sandwich Islands, we have news to the 10th of April. Parliament was opened on the 7th. In the Society group, the people of Raiatea have rebelled against the authority of Queen Pomare. She had just appointed one of her sons to the government of Raiatea, but before his arrival the inhabitants had assembled, as those of the others had previously done, elected a Governor of their own choice for two years, and formed a Republic of confederated States, each island to constitute a separate State. Military preparations had been made to resist any attempt on the part of the Queen to regain her authority. It was said that she had applied ineffectually for assistance to the French, English, and American authorities at Tahiti. There seemed to be little doubt that all the Leeward islands would establish their independence.

From the Hawaiian Islands, we have news as of April 10th. Parliament opened on the 7th. In the Society Islands, the people of Raiatea have revolted against Queen Pomare’s authority. She had just appointed one of her sons to govern Raiatea, but before he could arrive, the locals gathered, just like others had before, elected their own Governor for two years, and set up a Republic of confederated States, where each island would be its own separate State. They made military preparations to resist any attempts by the Queen to regain control. It was reported that she had unsuccessfully sought help from the French, English, and American authorities in Tahiti. There was little doubt that all the Leeward Islands would declare their independence.


MEXICO.

We have news from the city of Mexico to the 10th of May. The news of the rejection of the Tehuantepec treaty is fully confirmed. The vote was almost unanimous against it, and is fully sustained by the press and public sentiment. The Government, however, has appointed Mr. Larrainzas a special envoy to the United States, and has given him, it is said, instructions for arranging this difficulty upon some mutually-satisfactory basis. It is reported that Mexico is not unwilling to grant a right of way across the Isthmus, but that the very large grants of land embraced in the original treaty led to its rejection. Upon this point, however, nothing definite is known.——A difficulty has arisen between the Legislature of the State of Vera Cruz and the Mexican Congress. The former insists upon a greater reduction of the tariff of 1845 than the ten per cent. allowed by the National Senate. The Senate will allow this reduction of ten per cent., but refuses to do away with any of the duties. The Lower House of Congress, on the contrary, is in favor of abolishing some of the duties. Zacatecas and Durango, besides being ravaged by the savages, are suffering from the visitation of a general famine.

We have news from Mexico City as of May 10th. The rejection of the Tehuantepec treaty is fully confirmed. The vote was nearly unanimous against it, and it's strongly supported by public opinion and the media. However, the government has appointed Mr. Larrainza as a special envoy to the United States, and it's said he's been given instructions to resolve this issue on a mutually satisfactory basis. It's reported that Mexico is open to granting a right of way across the Isthmus, but the large land grants included in the original treaty are what led to its rejection. However, nothing concrete is known regarding this matter. —— A conflict has emerged between the Legislature of the State of Vera Cruz and the Mexican Congress. The former is pushing for a larger reduction of the 1845 tariff than the ten percent allowed by the National Senate. The Senate permits this ten percent reduction but refuses to eliminate any of the duties. On the other hand, the Lower House of Congress supports the abolition of some duties. Zacatecas and Durango, in addition to being devastated by raids, are experiencing a widespread famine.


SOUTH AMERICA.

From Buenos Ayres we have news to the 5th of April. The upper provinces have sent in felicitations to General Urquiza upon his accession to power. It is thought that the provinces will unite in a General Confederacy, under a Central Government, framed upon the model of that of the United States: and it is suggested that General Urquiza will probably aspire to the position of President. He is conducting affairs firmly and successfully, though against great difficulties in the province, and has issued several proclamations calling upon the people to sustain him in maintaining order and tranquillity. It is said that a rupture has occurred between the Brazilian authorities and the Oriental government, in regard to the execution of late treaties made and ratified by President Suarez. Negotiations had been suspended.

From Buenos Aires we have news as of April 5th. The upper provinces have sent congratulations to General Urquiza on his rise to power. It’s believed that the provinces will come together in a General Confederacy, with a Central Government modeled after that of the United States. There are suggestions that General Urquiza might aim for the position of President. He is managing affairs firmly and successfully, despite facing significant challenges in the province, and has issued several proclamations urging the people to support him in maintaining order and peace. It's reported that a split has occurred between the Brazilian authorities and the Oriental government regarding the implementation of recent treaties established and ratified by President Suarez. Negotiations have been put on hold.

From Chili we hear of the execution, at Valparaiso, on the 4th of April, of Cambiaso, the brigand leader of the convict insurrection at the Straits of Magellan, together with six of his accomplices. They all belonged to the army, Cambiaso being a lieutenant, and were stationed at the garrison. The insurrection which he headed resulted in the seizure of two American vessels, and the murder of all on board. Several others connected with him were convicted, but pardoned on proof that they had been forced to join him.

From Chili peppers, we learn about the execution in Valparaiso on April 4th of Cambiaso, the leader of the convict uprising at the Straits of Magellan, along with six of his accomplices. They were all part of the army, with Cambiaso holding the rank of lieutenant, and were stationed at the garrison. The uprising he led resulted in the seizure of two American ships and the killing of everyone on board. Several others associated with him were convicted but received pardons after it was proven that they had been coerced into joining him.

From Rio Janeiro the only news of interest, is that of the ravages of the yellow-fever, which has been very severe, especially among the shipping. At the middle of April, there were great numbers of[Pg 214] American ships in port, unable to muster hands enough to get out of port.

From Rio de Janeiro, the only news of interest is about the severe outbreak of yellow fever, which has hit hard, particularly affecting the shipping industry. By mid-April, there were many [Pg 214] American ships docked, unable to find enough crew to leave the port.

In Peru the Government has issued a decree against Gen. Flores's expedition, dated the 14th of March, and stated that having received repeated information of the warlike preparations taking place in Peru, they have ordered the Prefects of the different provinces to take all possible measures to put a stop to them; that government will not afford protection to any Peruvian citizen who should embark on this expedition, or take any part in it, and that all Peruvian vessels engaged in the expedition, would no longer be considered as bearing the national flag.

In Peru, the government has issued a decree against General Flores's expedition, dated March 14th. They stated that after receiving repeated reports about the military preparations occurring in Peru, they have ordered the Prefects of the various provinces to take all possible actions to stop them. The government will not provide protection to any Peruvian citizen who participates in this expedition, and all Peruvian vessels involved in the expedition will no longer be recognized as carrying the national flag.

From New Grenada we learn that the President has issued a Message concerning the Flores expedition against Ecuador. From this it appears that, according to a treaty of peace, amity, and alliance, established between the Government and that of Ecuador, in December, 1832, the one power is at all times bound to render aid to the other, both military and pecuniary, in case of foreign invasion. To this end, the President has proclaimed that there be raised in this country, either by loan or force, the sum of sixteen millions of reals, or two millions dollars; and further, that twenty thousand men be called to serve under arms, in order to assist the sister republic. The President declares his intention to oppose Flores and all countries rendering him aid, and accuses Peru of fitting out two vessels, and Valparaiso one, to assist in his expedition; he also demands authority to confiscate the property of all natives and foreigners residing in New Grenada, who may be found to have aided or abetted Flores in any way in his present revolutionary movement. He further states his belief that Flores is merely endeavoring to carry out his revolutionary movement of 1846, in which he was defeated by the British Government, and that the object of the present revolution is to re-establish a monarchical government on the South Pacific coast, under the old Spanish rule. He also expresses his fears that Flores, if successful in Ecuador, will immediately come into New Grenada, and therefore deems it not only a matter of honor, but also of policy, to assist Ecuador. Among the documents submitted, is an official letter to the Ecuadorian Government, from the United States Chargé d'Affairs at Guayaquil, the Hon. C. Cushing; in which he says that "he believes himself sufficiently authorized to state that the Government of the United States will not look with indifference at any warlike movements against Ecuador, likely to effect its independence or present government." At the latest dates, the 27th of April, Flores was still at Puna, delaying his attack upon that place until the war he had endeavored to excite between Peru and Ecuador, should break out. He then expected sufficient aid from Peru to render his capture of the place easy. Other accounts represent his forces as being rapidly diminished by desertion; but these can scarcely be deemed authentic. Reliable intelligence had reached Guayaquil that Peru had sent reinforcements to the fleet of Flores, and this had created so great an excitement that the residence of the Peruvian Consul was attacked and demolished by a mob.

From New Granada, we learn that the President has announced a message regarding the Flores expedition against Ecuador. It seems that, according to a peace treaty established between the government and Ecuador in December 1832, each power is obligated to assist the other—militarily and financially—in the event of a foreign invasion. To this end, the President has declared that a total of sixteen million reals, or two million dollars, be raised in this country, either through loans or by force; additionally, he has called for twenty thousand men to be mobilized to aid the sister republic. The President expresses his intention to oppose Flores and any nations supporting him, accusing Peru of fitting out two ships and Valparaiso one to assist his expedition. He also demands the authority to confiscate the property of any natives and foreigners in New Grenada who may have aided Flores in his current revolutionary efforts. He further argues that Flores is simply trying to revive his revolutionary campaign from 1846, in which he was defeated by the British government, and that the goal of this current revolution is to establish a monarchical government on the South Pacific coast under the old Spanish rule. He shares his concerns that if Flores succeeds in Ecuador, he will immediately move into New Grenada; therefore, he believes it is not only a matter of honor but also of policy to support Ecuador. Among the documents provided is an official letter to the Ecuadorian government from the United States Chargé d'Affairs in Guayaquil, the Hon. C. Cushing, in which he states that "he feels sufficiently authorized to indicate that the Government of the United States will not view any hostile actions against Ecuador, which may affect its independence or current government, with indifference." As of the latest updates on April 27, Flores was still at Puna, postponing his attack on that location until the conflict he had attempted to provoke between Peru and Ecuador had begun. He anticipated sufficient support from Peru to make capturing the place easy. Other reports suggest that his forces are rapidly dwindling due to desertion, but these accounts are hardly reliable. Trusted information has reached Guayaquil that Peru had sent reinforcements to Flores's fleet, which caused such a stir that a mob attacked and destroyed the residence of the Peruvian Consul.


GREAT BRITAIN.

The intelligence from England extends from the 19th of April to the 22d of May, and embraces several items of more than ordinary interest. Parliament re-assembled on the day first named, after the holiday recess. In the House of Commons a committee was appointed, to inquire into the condition of the British Empire in India,—after a speech upon that subject from the President of the Board of[Pg 215] Control, who took occasion to say that the affairs of that country had never before stood upon so good a footing, or in a position so well calculated to develop its resources. There were now 2846 natives employed in administrative offices, and forty educational establishments had been endowed, in which the instruction given was of the highest character.——On the 22d, Mr. Milner Gibson submitted a motion adverse to continuing the duty upon paper, the stamp duties upon newspapers, and the advertisement taxes. The proposition gave rise to a protracted discussion, in which the injurious character of these duties, in restricting the general diffusion of knowledge among the poorer classes of the English people, was very generally admitted, and a wish was expressed on all sides to have them removed. But the Chancellor of the Exchequer feared the effect of such a step upon the revenue of the kingdom—which the proposal would sacrifice to the extent of a million and a half of pounds. Upon his motion the debate was adjourned until the 12th of May, when it was renewed. Mr. Gladstone spoke earnestly in exposition of the depressing influence of these taxes upon the production and sale of books, but conceded full weight to the financial reasons which had been urged against their removal. The vote was then taken, first, upon the motion to abolish the paper duty as soon as it could be done with safety to the revenue: which received ayes, 107—noes, 195; being lost by a majority of 88; next, upon the abolition of the stamp duty on newspapers; for which there were ayes, 100—noes, 199: majority against it, 99; and lastly, upon the motion to abolish the tax upon advertisements, for which there were 116 ayes, and 181 noes, and which was thus rejected by a majority of 65.——On the 23d of April, the Militia Bill came up; and was supported by the Ministerial party, and opposed by the late Ministers. Lord John Russell opposed it, because he deemed it inadequate to the emergency. The 41,000 infantry which it proposed to raise, he deemed insufficient, and the character of the force provided, he feared would make it unreliable. Lord Palmerston vindicated the bill against Lord John's objections, and thought it at once less expensive and more efficient than the one submitted by the late government. On the 26th, to which the debate was adjourned, after further discussion, the second reading of the bill was carried by 315 to 105.——The bill came up again on the 6th, when Mr. Disraeli declared that its main object was to habituate the people of Great Britain to the use of arms, and thus to lay the foundation of a constitutional system of national defense. He did not claim that the bill would at once produce a disciplined army, able to encounter the veteran legions of the world; but it would be a step in the right direction. After the debate, an amendment, moved by Mr. Gibson, that the words 80,000 should not form part of the bill, was rejected, 106 to 207. On the 13th, the debate was renewed, and several other amendments, designed to embarrass the bill, were rejected. But up to our latest dates, the vote on its final passage had not been taken.——On the 10th of May, the Ministry was defeated, upon a motion of the Chancellor of the Exchequer for leave to bring in a bill to assign the four seats in Parliament, which would be vacated if the bill for the disfranchisement of the borough of St. Albans should pass. He proposed to assign two of these seats to the West-Riding of Yorkshire, and the other two to the southern division of the county of Lancaster. The motion was lost: receiving 148 votes in favor, and 234 against it—being an anti-Ministerial majority of 86.——The Tenant[Pg 216] Right Bill, intended to meliorate the condition of land cultivators in Ireland, was rejected on the 5th, by a vote of 57 to 167, upon the second reading.——The Court of Exchequer having decided against the right of Alderman Salomons to take his seat in Parliament, Lord Lyndhurst has introduced a bill to remove Jewish disabilities.——The Duke of Argyle called attention, on the 17th, to the case of Mr. Murray, an Englishman, who was said to have been imprisoned for several years in Rome, without a trial, and to be now lying under sentence of death. The Earl of Malmesbury said that strenuous efforts had been made to procure reliable information upon this case; but that great difficulty had been experienced, in consequence of the very defective and unworthy provisions which existed for diplomatic intercourse with the Roman government. The Duke of Argyle thought that the English government owed to its own dignity some energetic action upon this case. The correspondence upon this subject, as also that with Austria upon the expulsion of Protestant missionaries from that country, was promised at an early day. On the 27th of April, Mr. Disraeli, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, made the annual statement of the financial condition and necessities of the kingdom, which had been awaited with great interest, as an official announcement of the intended course of the new Ministry upon the subject of taxation. He discussed, in succession, the three modes of deriving income—from duties on imports, duties on domestic manufactures, and direct taxation. During the last ten years, under the policy established in 1842 by Sir Robert Peel, the duties upon corn and other articles of import, have been reduced, in the aggregate, upward of nine million pounds sterling; and this reduction had been so steadily and regularly made every year, that any proposition to restore them would now have very slight chances of success. In the excise duties, also, there had been reductions to the amount of a million and a half; and it was clear that the Minister who should propose to increase the revenue by adding to the duties on domestic manufactures, could not expect to be sustained by the House or the country. The income tax had been very unpopular, and could only be renewed last year, for a single year, and then with very considerable modifications. Comparing the actual income of the past year, with that which had been estimated, Mr. Disraeli said that, while it had been estimated at £52,140,000, the actual income had been £52,468,317, notwithstanding the loss of £640,000 by the change of the house tax for the window duty, and the reduction in the coffee, timber, and sugar duties. The customs had been estimated to produce £20,000,000. After deducting the anticipated loss, £400,000, on account of the three last-named duties, they had produced £20,673,000; and the consumption of the articles on which the duties had been reduced had increased—foreign coffee by 3,448,000 lbs., as compared with 1851, when the higher and differential duty prevailed; and colonial coffee from 28,216,000 lbs. to 29,130,000 lbs. Foreign sugar had increased in the last year by 412,000 cwts., and since 1846 (when the first reduction took place) by 1,900,000 cwts. a year; British colonial sugar, by upward of 114,000 in 1852, as compared with 1851; and during the last six years the consumption had increased 95,000 tons, or 33 per cent. on the consumption of 1846; and in timber the result was the same. The other heads of revenue had been thus estimated: Excise, £14,543,000; stamps, £6,310,000; taxes, £4,348,000; property tax, £5,380,000; Post-office, £830,000; Woods and Forests,[Pg 217] £160,000; miscellaneous, £262,000; old stores, £450,000; and had produced respectively £14,543,000, £6,346,000, £3,691,000, £5,283,000, £1,056,000, £150,000, £287,000, and £395,000. The expenditure of the year, estimated at £50,247,000, had been £50,291,000, and the surplus in hand was £2,176,988. The expenditure for the current year he estimated at £51,163,979, including an additional vote to be proposed of £200,000 for the Kaffir war, and another of £350,000 for the expenses of the militia. The income, which in some items had been increased by the Exhibition last year, was estimated for the next year thus—Customs, £20,572,000; Excise, £14,604,000; stamps, £6,339,000; taxes, £3,090,000; property tax (the half-year), £2,641,500; Post-office, £938,000; Woods and Forests, £235,000; miscellaneous, £260,000; old stores, £400,000; total, £48,983,000, exhibiting a deficiency of £2,180,479, which would be increased in the next year by the total loss of the income tax, supposing it not to be renewed, to £4,400,000. If, however, that tax were re-imposed, he calculated it would produce net £5,187,000, which would give a gross income, from all sources, of £51,625,000, the surplus would then be £461,021. And though it would give him great pleasure to re-adjust the burdens of taxation fairly and equally on all classes, and all interests, yet, seeing the position of the finances, and the difficulty, if not impossibility, of dealing with the subject in the present state of feeling in the House and the country, he felt bound to propose the re-imposition of the property and income tax for a further limited period of one year. This statement was received by the House, as by the whole country, as embodying a substantial tribute from the Protectionist Ministry to the soundness of the Free Trade policy and to the necessity of leaving it undisturbed.

The report from England covers the period from April 19 to May 22 and includes several items of significant interest. Parliament reconvened on the first date after a holiday break. In the House of Commons, a committee was formed to investigate the status of the British Empire in India, following a speech on that topic from the President of the Board of Control. He noted that the situation in India had never been as favorable as it is now, or so well positioned to develop its resources. Currently, there are 2,846 locals working in administrative positions, and forty educational institutions have been funded, providing top-quality instruction. On May 22, Mr. Milner Gibson put forward a motion against continuing the tax on paper, the stamp duties on newspapers, and the advertisement taxes. This led to a lengthy discussion, where it was widely acknowledged that these taxes hindered the spread of knowledge among poorer English citizens, and there was a strong desire for their removal. However, the Chancellor of the Exchequer was concerned about the potential impact on the government's revenue, estimating a loss of one and a half million pounds. Subsequently, he moved to adjourn the debate until May 12, when it was resumed. Mr. Gladstone passionately argued about the negative effects of these taxes on book production and sales but acknowledged the financial arguments against their elimination. The vote was then taken, first on the motion to abolish the paper duty as soon as it could be done safely regarding revenue, which received 107 votes in favor and 195 against, losing by a majority of 88. Next, the vote on eliminating the stamp duty on newspapers resulted in 100 ayes and 199 noes, a majority against of 99. Lastly, the motion to abolish the advertisement tax was also rejected, with 116 in favor and 181 against, resulting in a majority of 65 voting against it. On April 23, the Militia Bill was debated; it was supported by the government and opposed by former ministers. Lord John Russell argued it was inadequate for the current emergency, claiming that the proposed 41,000 infantry would not be enough and raised concerns about the reliability of the force. Lord Palmerston defended the bill against Lord John's criticisms, stating it was less costly and more effective than the previous government's proposal. After further discussions on April 26, the bill passed the second reading by 315 to 105. The bill was taken up again on May 6, during which Mr. Disraeli asserted that its primary goal was to familiarize the people of Great Britain with the use of arms, thereby laying the groundwork for a constitutional national defense system. He did not claim the bill would immediately create a disciplined army to compete with the world's veteran troops, but saw it as a positive step forward. After the debate, an amendment proposed by Mr. Gibson to remove the figure of 80,000 from the bill was rejected, with 106 votes against 207. On May 13, the debate continued, with several other amendments aimed at hindering the bill also being rejected. However, as of the latest updates, a vote on its final passage had not yet occurred. On May 10, the government faced defeat on a motion from the Chancellor of the Exchequer to present a bill assigning four parliamentary seats that would soon be vacated if the bill to disenfranchise St. Albans passed. He suggested allocating two of these seats to West Riding of Yorkshire and the other two to the southern division of Lancashire. The motion failed, receiving 148 votes in favor and 234 against, resulting in an anti-government majority of 86. The Tenant Right Bill, aimed at improving conditions for agricultural workers in Ireland, was rejected on May 5, with a vote of 57 to 167 on the second reading. After the Court of Exchequer ruled against Alderman Salomons' right to take his seat in Parliament, Lord Lyndhurst introduced a bill to eliminate Jewish disabilities. On May 17, the Duke of Argyle drew attention to the situation of Mr. Murray, an Englishman reportedly imprisoned for several years in Rome without trial and currently facing a death sentence. The Earl of Malmesbury stated that significant efforts had been made to gather accurate information about this case but faced challenges due to inadequate diplomatic communication with the Roman government. The Duke of Argyle felt the English government owed it to its dignity to take decisive action regarding this issue. Correspondence on this matter, as well as related communications with Austria concerning the expulsion of Protestant missionaries, was promised soon. On April 27, Mr. Disraeli, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, delivered the annual assessment of the kingdom's financial situation, which had been highly anticipated as it outlined the new government's approach to taxation. He discussed the three primary means of generating income: import duties, domestic manufacturing duties, and direct taxes. Over the past decade, following the policies put in place in 1842 by Sir Robert Peel, import duties on corn and other goods had been reduced by over nine million pounds. This yearly reduction had been so consistent that any proposal to reinstate the taxes now seemed unlikely to succeed. Excise duties had also seen reductions totaling one and a half million pounds, and it was clear that a minister attempting to increase revenue through raised domestic manufacturing duties would not receive support from either the House or the public. The income tax had fallen out of favor, allowing for only a one-year renewal last year with considerable changes. Comparing actual income from the past year to initial estimates, Mr. Disraeli noted that while it was projected at £52,140,000, the actual income reached £52,468,317, despite a loss of £640,000 due to the changes in the household tax for window duty and reductions in coffee, timber, and sugar duties. The customs were projected to produce £20,000,000, but after accounting for an expected loss of £400,000 from the aforementioned duties, the actual income was £20,673,000. Consumption of reduced-duty items increased, including foreign coffee up by 3,448,000 lbs. compared to 1851 and British colonial sugar consumption increasing by over 114,000 in 1852 compared to 1851. Other sources of revenue were estimated as follows: Excise, £14,543,000; stamps, £6,310,000; taxes, £4,348,000; property tax, £5,380,000; Post-office, £830,000; Woods and Forests, £160,000; miscellaneous, £262,000; old stores, £450,000; and they respectively produced £14,543,000, £6,346,000, £3,691,000, £5,283,000, £1,056,000, £150,000, £287,000, and £395,000. The estimated expenditure for the year was £50,247,000, but actual spending amounted to £50,291,000, leading to a surplus of £2,176,988. The budget for the current year was estimated at £51,163,979, which included an additional proposal of £200,000 for the Kaffir war and another £350,000 for militia expenses. The income, which increased in some areas due to last year's Exhibition, was projected for the next year as follows: Customs, £20,572,000; Excise, £14,604,000; stamps, £6,339,000; taxes, £3,090,000; property tax (for half a year), £2,641,500; Post-office, £938,000; Woods and Forests, £235,000; miscellaneous, £260,000; old stores, £400,000; totaling £48,983,000 and indicating a shortage of £2,180,479, which would increase the following year by the total loss of the income tax, assuming it wasn’t renewed, to £4,400,000. However, if the income tax were reintroduced, he estimated it would yield net £5,187,000, creating a gross income of £51,625,000, leaving a surplus of £461,021. He expressed his desire to fairly and equally redistribute tax burdens across all classes and interests, but given the current financial situation and the complexities of handling this issue amid prevailing sentiments in both the House and the public, he felt compelled to propose extending the property and income tax for another limited year. This statement was well-received by the House and the public as a significant acknowledgment from the Protectionist government of the validity of the Free Trade policy and the need to maintain it.

The annual dinner of the Royal Academy was attended on the 1st with more than usual eclat. Sir Charles Eastlake presided, and proposed the health of the Duke of Wellington, who duly acknowledged the compliment. The Earl of Derby was present, and spoke encouragingly of the prospect of having a better building soon erected for the accommodation of the Academy's works. Pleasant compliments were exchanged between Disraeli and Lord John Russell, and speeches were made by sundry other dignitaries who were in attendance.——At the Lord Mayor's dinner, on the 8th, the festivities partook more of a political character. The Earl of Derby spoke long and eloquently of the nature of the British Government, urging that in all its various departments it was a compromise between conflicting expedients and a system of mutual concessions between apparently conflicting interests. Count Walewski, the French Minister, congratulated the company on the good understanding which prevailed between France and England, and Mr. Disraeli spoke of the House of Commons as a true republic—"the only republic, indeed, that exists founded upon the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity; but liberty there was maintained by order—equality is mitigated by good taste, and fraternity takes the shape of cordial brotherhood."——The anniversary dinner of the Royal Literary Fund took place on the 12th, and was chiefly distinguished by an amusing speech from Thackeray.

The annual dinner of the Royal Academy was held on the 1st and was more glamorous than usual. Sir Charles Eastlake was in charge and proposed a toast to the Duke of Wellington, who graciously acknowledged the honor. The Earl of Derby was there and spoke positively about the possibility of a new building being constructed for the Academy's works. Disraeli and Lord John Russell exchanged friendly compliments, and several other dignitaries in attendance gave speeches.——At the Lord Mayor's dinner on the 8th, the atmosphere was more politically charged. The Earl of Derby spoke at length and eloquently about the nature of the British Government, emphasizing that it represents a compromise among conflicting options and a system of mutual concessions between seemingly opposing interests. Count Walewski, the French Minister, congratulated everyone on the strong relationship between France and England, while Mr. Disraeli described the House of Commons as a genuine republic—“the only republic, in fact, that exists based on the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity; but liberty is maintained through order—equality is tempered by good taste, and fraternity takes the form of genuine brotherhood.”——The anniversary dinner of the Royal Literary Fund took place on the 12th and was mainly notable for an entertaining speech by Thackeray.

An important collision has occurred between the book publishers in London and the retail booksellers, which has engrossed attention to no inconsiderable extent. The publishers, it seems, have been in the habit of fixing a retail price upon their books, and then selling them to dealers at a deduction of twenty-five[Pg 218] per cent. Some of the latter, thinking to increase their sales thereby, have contented themselves with a smaller rate of profit, and have sold their books at less than the price fixed by the publishers. Against this the latter have taken active measures of remonstrance, having formed an association among themselves, and agreed to refuse to deal with booksellers who should thus undersell the regular trade. On the other hand the retail dealers have held meetings to assert their rights, and one of them, held on the 4th, was attended by a very large number of the authors and men of letters interested in the question. Mr. Dickens presided, and a characteristic letter was read from Mr. Carlyle, who was warmly in favor of the objects of the meeting, though he thought many other things necessary to give authors their proper position in society. The rights of the case were submitted to Lord Campbell, Mr. Grote, and Dr. Milman, who heard both sides argued, and gave a decision on the 18th, on all points against the regulations for which the publishers contended.

An important conflict has emerged between book publishers in London and retail booksellers, capturing a significant amount of attention. The publishers have been setting a retail price for their books and then selling them to dealers at a 25% discount. Some of these dealers, hoping to boost their sales, have decided to accept a lower profit margin and sell their books for less than the price set by the publishers. In response, the publishers have taken active steps to protest, forming an association and agreeing to stop doing business with booksellers who undercut the standard pricing. Meanwhile, the retail dealers have held meetings to claim their rights, with a particularly well-attended one on the 4th that included many authors and literary figures concerned about the issue. Mr. Dickens chaired the meeting, and a notable letter was read from Mr. Carlyle, who expressed strong support for the meeting's goals but also emphasized the need for other changes to establish authors' rightful status in society. The issue was presented to Lord Campbell, Mr. Grote, and Dr. Milman, who heard arguments from both sides and ultimately ruled on the 18th against the publishers' proposed regulations.

Very sad intelligence has reached England of the fate of a party of seven missionaries, who were sent out by the Protestant Missionary Society, in 1850, to Patagonia. Captain Gardiner was at the head of the band. The vessel that took them out landed at Picton Island, off the southern coast of Terra del Fuego, on the 6th of December, 1850, and kept hovering about to see how they were likely to be received. The natives seemed menacing: but on the 18th of December the missionaries left the ship, and with their stores of provisions, Bibles, &c., embarked in two boats, meaning to make for the coast of Terra del Fuego. On the 19th the ship sailed; and no news of them having reached England, the ship Dido was ordered by the Admiralty in October, 1850, to touch there, and ascertain their fate. The Dido reached the coast in January, and after ten or twelve days of search, on a rock near where they first landed on Picton Island, a writing was found directing them to go to Spaniard Harbor, on the opposite Fuegan coast. Here were found, near a large cavern, the unburied bodies of Captain Gardiner and another of the party; and the next day the bodies of three others were found. A manuscript journal, kept by Captain Gardiner, down to the last day when, only two or three days before his death, he became too weak to write, was also found, from which it appeared that the parties were driven off by the natives whenever they attempted to land; that they were thus compelled to go backward and forward in their boats, and at last took refuge in Spaniard harbor, as the only spot where they could be safe; that they lived there eight months, partly in a cavern and partly under shelter of one of the boats, and that three of them died by sickness, and the others by literal and lingering starvation. Four months elapsed between the death of the last of the party and the discovery of their bodies. The publication of the journal of Captain Gardiner, in which profound piety is shown mingled with his agonizing grief, has excited a deep sensation throughout England.——An explosion occurred in a coal pit in the Aberdare valley, South Wales, on the 10th, by which sixty-four lives were lost; another pit near Pembrey filled with water the same night, and twenty-seven men were drowned.——The fate of the Crystal Palace was sealed by a vote in the House of Commons of 103 to 221 on a proposition to provide for its preservation. It has been sold, and is to be forthwith taken down, and re-erected out of town, for a winter garden.——A memorial numerously and most respectably signed, was presented to the Lord Lieutenant[Pg 219] of Ireland, on the 17th of May, praying that the Queen would extend clemency to the Irish State prisoners now in exile at Van Dieman's Land. The Lord Lieutenant, in a brief and direct speech, declined to lay the memorial before her Majesty, on the ground that the exiles in question deserved no further clemency at her hands. He noticed, with censure, the fact that one of them had effected his escape.

Very sad news has arrived in England about the fate of seven missionaries sent by the Protestant Missionary Society in 1850 to Patagonia. Captain Gardiner led the group. The ship that took them out stopped at Picton Island, off the southern coast of Tierra del Fuego, on December 6, 1850, and stayed nearby to see how they would be received. The locals appeared threatening, but on December 18, the missionaries left the ship with their supplies, Bibles, and other belongings, setting out in two boats towards the coast of Tierra del Fuego. On December 19, the ship departed; since no news had reached England, the ship Dido was ordered by the Admiralty in October 1850 to check on them and find out what happened. The Dido arrived at the coast in January, and after searching for ten or twelve days, they discovered a note on a rock where the missionaries had first landed on Picton Island, instructing them to go to Spaniard Harbor on the opposite Fuegan coast. Near a large cave, they found the unburied bodies of Captain Gardiner and another member of the group; the next day, the bodies of three more were discovered. A manuscript journal kept by Captain Gardiner up to just a couple of days before he became too weak to write revealed that they were driven away by the locals whenever they tried to land, forcing them to drift back and forth in their boats until they found refuge in Spaniard Harbor, the only safe location. They lived there for eight months, partly in a cave and partly under one of the boats, during which three of them died from illness and the others from severe starvation. Four months went by between the last party member's death and the discovery of their bodies. The publication of Captain Gardiner's journal, which expresses deep faith intermingled with his intense sorrow, has stirred significant emotion across England.——An explosion occurred in a coal pit in the Aberdare Valley, South Wales, on the 10th, resulting in sixty-four deaths; another pit near Pembrey filled with water that same night, drowning twenty-seven men.——A vote in the House of Commons sealed the fate of the Crystal Palace, which was lost by a count of 103 to 221 on a proposal to fund its preservation. It has been sold and will soon be dismantled and reassembled outside the city as a winter garden.——A highly signed and respectable memorial was presented to the Lord Lieutenant[Pg 219] of Ireland on May 17, requesting that the Queen extend clemency to the Irish political prisoners currently in exile in Van Diemen's Land. The Lord Lieutenant gave a brief speech declining to present the memorial to her Majesty, asserting that the exiles in question did not deserve any further mercy. He criticized the fact that one of them had managed to escape.


FRANCE.

The fêtes of May 10th, were attended with great splendor and eclat; but the non-proclamation of the Empire on that occasion is the feature most remarked upon by the foreign press. The number of troops present is estimated at 80,000. The whole Champ de Mars had been prepared especially for the occasion. The President was received with loud applause. After distributing the eagles among the various regiments, he addressed them briefly, saying that the history of nations was, in a great measure, the history of armies—that on their success or reverse depends the fate of civilization and of the country; that the Roman eagle adopted by the Emperor Napoleon at the commencement of the century was the most striking signification of the regeneration and the grandeur of France; and that it should now be resumed, not as a menace against foreign powers, but as the symbol of independence, the souvenir of an heroic epoch, and as the sign of the nobleness of each regiment. After this address the standards were taken to the chapel and blessed by the Archbishop. The ceremonies were protracted and attended by an immense concourse of spectators.——General Changarnier has addressed a remarkable letter to the Minister of the Interior in reply to his demand that he should take the oath of allegiance to Louis Napoleon. He says that the President had repeatedly endeavored to seduce him to his support—that he had offered not only to make him Marshal but to confer upon him another military dignity unknown since the Empire, and to attach to it immense pecuniary rewards; that when he perceived that personal ambition had no effect upon him, he endeavored to gain him over, by pretending a design to prepare the way for the restoration of the Monarchy to which he supposed him to be attached. All these attempts had been without effect. He had never ceased to be ready to defend with energy the legal powers of Louis Napoleon, and to give every opposition to the illegal prolongation of those powers. The exile he had undergone in solitude and silence had not changed his opinion of the duties he owed to France. He would hasten to her defense should she be attacked, but he refused the oath exacted by the perjured man who had failed to corrupt him. In reply to this letter, M. Cassagnac, editor of the Constitutionnel, brought against General Changarnier specific charges—that in March, 1849, he demanded from Louis Napoleon written authority to throw the Constituent Assembly out of the window—that he subsequently urged him in the strongest manner to make a coup d'etat; and that in November, 1850, he assembled a number of political personages, and proposed to them to arrest Louis Napoleon and send him to prison, to prorogue the Assembly for six months, and to make him Dictator. It was further alleged that one of the persons present at this meeting was M. Molé, who refused to sanction the scheme and immediately disclosed it to the President. Count Molé immediately published an indignant denial of the whole story, so far as his name had been connected with it.——General Lamoriciere has, also, in a published letter, refused to take the oath required; he declares[Pg 220] his readiness to defend France against foreign foes whenever she shall be attacked, but he will not take the oath of fidelity to a perjured chief.——The venerable astronomer, Arago, has also refused to take the oath of allegiance required of all connected in any way with the government. He wrote a firm and dignified letter to the Minister notifying him of his purpose, and calling on him to designate the day when it would be necessary for him to quit the Bureau of Longitude with which he had been so closely connected for half a century. He also informed him that he should address a circular letter to scientific men throughout the world, explaining the necessity which drove him from an establishment with which his name had been so long associated, and to vindicate his motives from suspicion. The Minister informed him that, in consideration of his eminent services to the cause of science, the government had decided not to exact the oath, and that he could therefore retain his post.——These examples of non-concurrence in the new policy of the President have been followed by inferior magistrates in various parts of France. In several of the departments members of the local councils have refused to take the oaths of allegiance, and in the towns of Havre, Thiers, and Evreux the tribunals of commerce have done likewise. The civil courts of Paris have also, in one or two instances, asserted their independence by deciding against the government in prosecutions commenced against the press. On the 23d of April, moreover, the civil tribunal gave judgment on the demand made by the Princes of the Orleans family to declare illegal the seizure by the Prefect of the Seine, of the estates of Neuilly and Monceaux, under the decree of the 22d of January, relative to the property of the late king, Louis Philippe. In answer to this demand, the Prefect of the Seine, in the name of the government, called on the tribunal to declare that the decree of 22d January was a legislative act, and the seizure of the property an administrative act, and that consequently the tribunal had no jurisdiction. The case was pleaded at great length; and the court pronounced a judgment declaring itself competent, keeping the case before it, fixing a day for discussing it on its merits, and condemning the Prefect in costs. These movements indicate a certain degree of reaction in the public mind, and have prepared the way for the favorable reception of a letter which the Bourbon pretender, the Count de Chambord, has issued to the partisans of monarchy throughout France. This letter is dated at Venice, April 27, and is designed as an official declaration of his wishes to all who wish still to remain faithful to the principles which he represents. He declares it to be the first duty of royalists to do no act, to enter into no engagement, in opposition to their political faith. They must not hesitate, therefore, to refuse all offices where promises are required from them contrary to their principles, and which would not permit them to do in all circumstances what their convictions impose upon them. Still, important and active duties are devolved upon them. They should reside as much as possible in the midst of the population on whom they can exercise influence, and should try, by rendering themselves useful to them, to acquire, each day, still greater claims to their gratitude and confidence. They ought also to aid the government in its struggles against anarchy and socialism, and to show themselves in all emergencies the most courageous defenders of social order. Even in case of an attempt to re-establish the Empire, they are exhorted to abstain from doing any thing to endanger the repose[Pg 221] of the country, but to protest formally against any change which can endanger the destinies of France, and expose it once more to catastrophes and perils from which the legitimate monarchy alone can save it. He urges them to be unalterable on matters of principle, but at the same time calm, patient, and ever moderate and conciliating toward persons. "Let your ranks, your hearts," he says, "like mine, remain continually open to all. We are all thrown on times of trials and of sacrifices; and my friends will not forget that it is from the land of exile that I make this new appeal to their constancy and their devotedness. Happier days are yet in store for France and for us. I am certain of the fact. It is in my ardent love for my country—it is in the hope of serving it—of being able to serve it—that I gather the strength and the courage necessary for me to accomplish the great duties which have been imposed on me by Providence."——Additional importance is ascribed to this proclamation from the fact that it was made just after a visit from the Grand Dukes of Russia and Venice, and just before the arrival of the Emperor Nicholas at Vienna. The death of Prince Schwarzenberg is supposed to have led to a still closer union of interest and of policy between Austria and Russia, as the personal leanings both of the Austrian Emperor, and the new prime Minister are known to be in that direction.

The fêtes on May 10th were held with great pomp and flair, but the lack of an Empire proclamation on that day stood out the most in the foreign press. About 80,000 troops were estimated to be present. The entire Champ de Mars was specially prepared for the event. The President received a warm welcome with loud applause. After handing out eagles to various regiments, he gave a brief speech, stating that the history of nations largely mirrors the history of their armies—that their success or failure determines the fate of civilization and the country. He emphasized that the Roman eagle, adopted by Emperor Napoleon at the start of the century, symbolized the rebirth and greatness of France, and that it should now be embraced, not as a threat to foreign powers, but as a symbol of independence, a reminder of a heroic era, and a badge of honor for each regiment. Following this speech, the standards were taken to the chapel and blessed by the Archbishop. The ceremonies were lengthy and drew a huge crowd of spectators.——General Changarnier has written a noteworthy letter to the Minister of the Interior in response to a request for him to pledge allegiance to Louis Napoleon. He explains that the President had tried several times to win him over, offering not just a Marshal title but also another military honor that hadn’t been seen since the Empire, accompanied by substantial financial rewards. When he realized that personal ambition would not sway him, he attempted to persuade him under the pretense of preparing for the restoration of the Monarchy, which he thought Changarnier favored. All these efforts had no effect. He was always prepared to defend Louis Napoleon's legal powers and to oppose any illegal extension of those powers. The solitude and silence of his exile did not alter his views on his duties to France. He would rush to her defense if attacked, but he refused the oath demanded by the dishonest man who had tried to corrupt him. In response to this letter, M. Cassagnac, editor of the Constitutionnel, brought specific allegations against General Changarnier—that in March 1849, he asked Louis Napoleon for written authorization to throw the Constituent Assembly out the window; that he later strongly urged him to carry out a coup d'état; and that in November 1850, he gathered several political figures to propose arresting Louis Napoleon and sending him to prison, extending the Assembly’s session for six months, and making him Dictator. Further, it was claimed that among those present at this meeting was M. Molé, who rejected the plan and quickly disclosed it to the President. Count Molé promptly issued a furious denial regarding his involvement in the entire story.——General Lamoriciere has also published a letter refusing to take the required oath; he states[Pg 220] his willingness to defend France against foreign threats whenever she is attacked, but he will not pledge loyalty to a perjured leader.——The respected astronomer, Arago, has also declined to take the oath of allegiance required of anyone connected in any way to the government. He wrote a firm and dignified letter to the Minister, notifying him of his intention and requesting him to name the day when he should leave the Bureau of Longitude, with which he has been closely associated for half a century. He also informed him that he would send a circular letter to scientists around the world, explaining the necessity of leaving an institution so long associated with his name, and to clarify his motives from suspicion. The Minister informed him that, given his significant contributions to science, the government decided not to enforce the oath, allowing him to keep his position.——These instances of disagreement with the President's new policy have been followed by lower-level officials in various regions of France. In several departments, members of local councils have declined to take the oaths of loyalty, and in the towns of Havre, Thiers, and Evreux, the commercial courts have done the same. The civil courts in Paris have also, in a few cases, shown their independence by ruling against the government in legal actions initiated against the press. On April 23rd, the civil court ruled on a claim made by the Princes of the Orleans family, seeking to declare illegal the seizure of the estates of Neuilly and Monceaux by the Prefect of the Seine, under the January 22nd decree regarding the property of the late king, Louis Philippe. In response to this claim, the Prefect of the Seine, on behalf of the government, urged the court to rule that the January 22nd decree was a legislative act and that the property seizure was an administrative act, and therefore the court had no jurisdiction. The case was extensively argued, and the court ruled itself competent, keeping the case before it, setting a date to discuss the merits, and ordering the Prefect to pay court costs. These actions indicate a certain degree of backlash in public opinion and have laid the groundwork for the favorable reception of a letter from the Bourbon pretender, Count de Chambord, sent to the supporters of monarchy across France. This letter, dated in Venice on April 27, officially conveys his wishes to those who still wish to remain loyal to the principles he represents. He states that royalists' first duty is to take no action and enter no agreements that conflict with their political beliefs. They should not hesitate to refuse all positions that require promises contrary to their principles, preventing them from acting upon their convictions. Yet, important and active responsibilities remain for them. They should reside among the people they can influence, striving to be of service in order to earn their gratitude and trust daily. They should also support the government in its fight against anarchy and socialism and be the most courageous defenders of social order in any emergency. Even if there’s an attempt to restore the Empire, they are encouraged to refrain from doing anything that jeopardizes the country’s peace, while formally protesting any changes that could threaten France’s future and expose it to disasters that only a legitimate monarchy can prevent. He urges them to hold firm on principles but remain calm, patient, and always moderate and conciliating toward others. "Let your ranks, your hearts," he says, "like mine, stay open to everyone. We are all facing times of trials and sacrifices; and my friends will not forget that it is from the land of exile that I make this new appeal to their steadfastness and devotion. Better days are ahead for France and for us. I am certain of this. It’s in my deep love for my country—it’s in the hope of being able to serve it—that I find the strength and courage needed to fulfill the great responsibilities placed on me by Providence."——Additional significance is attached to this proclamation since it was made just after a visit from the Grand Dukes of Russia and Venice, and just before Emperor Nicholas's arrival in Vienna. The death of Prince Schwarzenberg is believed to have led to a closer alignment of interests and policies between Austria and Russia, as both the Austrian Emperor and the new Prime Minister are known to lean in that direction.

Some further developments have been made of the sentiments of the three allied powers, Austria, Russia, and Prussia, concerning the re-establishment of the Empire in France. It is represented that the late Minister of Austria was in favor of encouraging such a step, but that both the other powers concurred in saying that the accomplishment of it would be a "violation of the treaties of 1814 and 1815, inasmuch as those treaties have excluded for ever the family of Bonaparte from the government of France." Now, those treaties form the basis of the whole policy of Europe; and it is the duty of the powers to demand that they shall be respected by the President of the Republic himself in all their provisions, and particularly not to permit any infraction of them as to the point in question, which has reference to him personally. Nevertheless, the sovereigns of Prussia and Russia would not perhaps be disposed to refuse to recognize Louis Napoleon Bonaparte as Emperor of the French Republic—if that title were conferred on him by a new plébiscite—as had been spoken of but they should only recognize him as an elective Emperor, and for life, with only a status analogous to that of the former kings of Poland. If the two cabinets of St. Petersburg and Berlin consented to such a recognition, it was the utmost that it was possible to do; but, most certainly, beyond that point they should never go. At the same time, the cabinets formally declare, that they would only recognize the Emperor of the French Republic on the condition of his election being the result of the mode already announced (the plébiscite). They will not admit any other manner of re-establishing in France an imperial throne, even were it but for life; the two sovereigns being firmly resolved never to accept in the person of Louis Napoleon Bonaparte, any other than the supreme elective chief of the Republic, and to oppose by all the means in their power the pretension of establishing the actual President of the French Republic as Emperor, in the sense of an hereditary transmitter or founder of a Napoleonian dynasty. They add, that Louis Napoleon Bonaparte not being the issue of a sovereign or reigning family, can not become a real sovereign, or assimilate himself to reigning houses.——The pictures belonging[Pg 222] to the late Marshal Soult were sold at auction on the 19th. The collection consisted of 157 paintings, and among them were many of the master-pieces of the old masters. The most celebrated was Murillo's 'Conception of the Virgin,' for which the chief competitors were the Emperor of Russia, the Queen of Spain, and the Director of the Louvre. It was bought by the latter at the enormous price of 586,000 francs,—or about $117,200.

Some further developments have been made regarding the views of the three allied powers—Austria, Russia, and Prussia—about re-establishing the Empire in France. It’s reported that the former Minister of Austria supported encouraging such a move, but both of the other powers agreed that doing so would be a "violation of the treaties of 1814 and 1815, which have permanently excluded the Bonaparte family from the government of France." These treaties form the foundation of European policy, and it's the responsibility of the powers to ensure that the President of the Republic adheres to all their provisions, especially concerning the issue at hand, which relates to him personally. However, the sovereigns of Prussia and Russia might not be outright opposed to recognizing Louis Napoleon Bonaparte as Emperor of the French Republic—if that title were granted to him through a new plebiscite, as has been discussed—but they would only recognize him as an elected Emperor for life, with a status similar to that of the former kings of Poland. If the governments of St. Petersburg and Berlin agreed to such recognition, it would be the most they could do; beyond that, they would not go. At the same time, the governments officially declare that they would only recognize the Emperor of the French Republic if his election results from the previously stated method (the plebiscite). They will not accept any other way of restoring an imperial throne in France, even for life; both sovereigns are firmly committed to recognizing Louis Napoleon Bonaparte only as the supreme elected leader of the Republic and will oppose by any means possible the idea of establishing the current President of the French Republic as Emperor, in the sense of an hereditary successor or founder of a Napoleonic dynasty. They add that Louis Napoleon Bonaparte, not being a member of a royal or reigning family, cannot become a true sovereign or be equated with reigning houses.——The pictures belonging[Pg 222] to the late Marshal Soult were sold at auction on the 19th. The collection included 157 paintings, many of which were masterpieces by old masters. The most famous was Murillo's 'Conception of the Virgin,' for which the top bidders were the Emperor of Russia, the Queen of Spain, and the Director of the Louvre. The latter purchased it for the staggering price of 586,000 francs—around $117,200.


EASTERN AND SOUTHERN EUROPE.

In Prussia, a communication was made on the 28th of April by the King to the Chambers, transmitting a bill to abolish the articles of the Constitution and regulate the organization of the peerage. In the First Chamber it was referred to the existing committee on the constitution of the body concerned. In the Second Chamber a committee was appointed to consider the measure. The minister desired that the matter might be quickly dispatched. In the same sitting of the 28th, the Second Chamber came to two other important votes. It rejected, by a majority of 186 to 82, the resolution of the First Chamber, and which, dividing the budget of ordinary and extraordinary expenses, decided that the first should be no longer fixed annually, but once for all, and that no future modification should take place, except by a law. It also rejected, by 225 to 57, another decision of the First Chamber, by which it had declared, in opposition to the Constitution, that it could vote the budget, article by article, like the Second Chamber.

In Prussia, on April 28th, the King addressed the Chambers, presenting a bill to eliminate certain constitutional articles and adjust the structure of the peerage. In the First Chamber, it was handed over to the current committee on the body’s constitution. In the Second Chamber, a committee was set up to review the proposal. The minister requested that the issue be resolved quickly. During the same session on the 28th, the Second Chamber made two other significant votes. It rejected, by a majority of 186 to 82, the First Chamber's resolution, which aimed to separate the ordinary and extraordinary expenses in the budget, stating that the ordinary expenses should only be set once, without any future changes unless through legislation. It also rejected, by 225 to 57, another decision from the First Chamber that claimed, contrary to the Constitution, it could vote on the budget article by article like the Second Chamber.

In Tuscany a decree of the Grand Duke has abolished the Constitution and Civic Guard, and constituted the government on the same basis as before 1848. The ministers are henceforward responsible to the Grand Duke; the Council of State is separated from that of the Ministers; the communal law of 1849 and the law on the press are to be revised.

In Tuscany, a decree from the Grand Duke has abolished the Constitution and the Civic Guard, restoring the government to its pre-1848 structure. The ministers will now be accountable to the Grand Duke; the Council of State is separate from the Council of Ministers; the communal law from 1849 and the press law will be revised.

The Danish question has been settled in London, by conferences of the representatives of the several powers concerned. Prince Christian of Glucksberg is to succeed to the crown on the death of the present King and his brother, both of whom are childless.

The Danish pastry issue has been resolved in London through discussions among the representatives of the various involved powers. Prince Christian of Glucksberg will inherit the crown upon the death of the current King and his brother, both of whom have no children.

In Turkey all differences with Egypt have been adjusted. Fuad-Effendi, it is announced by the Paris Presse, justifying all the hopes which his mission had given birth to, has come to a complete understanding with the Egyptian government, whose good intentions and perfect fair dealing he admits. The Viceroy accepts the code with the modifications called for by the state of the country, and which the Turco-Egyptian Commissioners had already fixed in their conferences at Constantinople. On its side, the Porte accords to the Viceroy the right of applying the punishment of death during seven years, without reference to the divan.

In Turkey, all disagreements with Egypt have been resolved. Fuad-Effendi, as reported by the Paris Presse, has successfully reached a full agreement with the Egyptian government, affirming the optimism his mission inspired. The Viceroy accepts the code with the adjustments needed due to the country's situation, which the Turco-Egyptian Commissioners had already established during their meetings in Constantinople. In turn, the Porte grants the Viceroy the authority to impose the death penalty for seven years without consulting the divan.


Editor’s Desk.

The birth-day of a nation is not merely a figurative expression. Nations are born as well as men. The very etymology of the word implies as much. Social compacts may be declarative of their independence, or definitive of their existence, but do not create them. In truth, all such compacts and conventions do in themselves imply a previous natural growth or organization lying necessarily still farther back, as the ground of any legitimacy they may possess. There can be no con-vening unless there is something to determine, a priori, who shall come together, and how they shall come together—as representatives of what principals—as parts of what ascertained whole—with what powers, on what terms, and for what ends. There can no more be an artificial nation than an artificial language. Aside from other influences, all attempts of the kind must be as abortive in politics as they have ever been in philology. Nations are not manufactured, either to order or otherwise, but born—born of other nations, and nurtured in those peculiar arrangements of God's providence which are expressly adapted to such a result. The analogy between them and individuals may be traced to almost any extent. They have, in general, some one event in which there may be discovered the conceptive principle, or principium, of their national life. They have their embryo or formative period. They have their birth, or the time of their complete separation from the maternal nationality to which they were most nearly and dependently united. They have their struggling infancy—their youth—their growth—their heroic period—their iron age of hardship and utility—their manhood—their silver age of luxury and refinement—their golden age of art and science and literature—their acme—their decline—their decay—their final extinction, or else their dissolution into those fragmentary organisms from which spring up again the elements or seeds of future nationalities.

The birthday of a nation isn't just a figurative phrase. Nations are born just like people. The very origin of the word suggests that. Social agreements might be declarative of their independence or define their existence, but they don't actually create them. In reality, all these agreements and conventions imply a prior natural growth or organization that must be further back, serving as the basis for any legitimacy they might have. There can't be a con-vening unless there's something that determines, a priori, who will come together and how they will come together—as representatives of what principals—as parts of what defined whole—with what powers, on what terms, and for what purposes. There can't be an artificial nation any more than there can be an artificial language. Regardless of other influences, all such attempts must fail in politics just as they have in linguistics. Nations aren’t manufactured, whether on demand or otherwise; they are born—born from other nations and nurtured within those unique arrangements of God's providence that are specifically designed for such outcomes. The comparison between them and individuals can be traced quite far. Generally, they have a specific event that reveals the conceptive principle or principium of their national life. They have their embryo or formative phase. They have their birth, or the moment of their full separation from the maternal nationality they were most closely and dependently connected to. They have their challenging infancy—their youth—their growth—their heroic period—their iron age of struggle and practicality—their manhood—their silver age of luxury and refinement—their golden age of art, science, and literature—their peak—their decline—their decay—their final extinction, or else their breaking down into those fragmented forms from which the elements or seeds of future nations emerge again.

We need not trace our own history through each of these periods. The incipient stages have all been ours, although, in consequence of a more healthy and vigorous maternity, we have passed through them with a rapidity of which the previous annals of the world present no examples. Less than a century has elapsed since that birth, whose festive natal day is presented in the calendar of the present month, and yet we are already approaching the season of manhood. We have passed that proud period which never comes but once in a nation's life, although it may be succeeded by others far surpassing it in what may be esteemed the more substantial elements of national wealth and national prosperity. Almost every state has had its heroic age. We too have had ours, and we may justly boast of it as one equaling in interest and grandeur any similar period in the annals of Greece and Rome—as one which would not shrink from a comparison with the chivalrous youth of any of the nations of modern Europe. It is the unselfish age, or rather, the time when the self-consciousness, both individual and national, is lost in some strong and all-absorbing emotion—when a strange elevation of feeling and dignity of action are imparted to human nature, and men act from motives which seem unnatural and incredible to the more calculating and selfish temperaments of succeeding times. It is a period which seems designed by Providence, not for itself only, or the great effects of which it is the immediate cause, but for its influence upon the whole after-current of the national existence.[Pg 223] The strong remembrance of it becomes a part of the national life; it enters into its most common and constant thinking, gives a peculiar direction to its feeling; it imparts a peculiar character to its subsequent action; it makes its whole historical being very different from what it would have been had there been no such epic commencement, no such superhuman or heroic birth. It furnishes a treasury of glorious reminiscences wherewith to reinvigorate from time to time the national virtue when impaired, as it ever is, by the factious, and selfish, and unheroic temper produced by subsequent days of merely economical or utilitarian prosperity.

We don’t need to go through our history in each of these periods. We’ve experienced all the early stages, but thanks to a healthier and more dynamic foundation, we’ve moved through them at a speed that no previous records in history can match. Less than a hundred years ago, a significant event took place, celebrated on the calendar in this month, and now we are already reaching adulthood. We've moved past that proud moment that only happens once in a nation’s life, although it may be followed by other times that could far exceed it in terms of true national wealth and prosperity. Almost every state has had its heroic era. We’ve had ours too, and we can rightfully claim it as one that matches in significance and grandeur any similar era in the history of Greece and Rome—an era that stands strong in comparison to the chivalrous youth of any modern European nations. It is the selfless age, or rather, a time when individual and national self-awareness is absorbed by some powerful and compelling emotion—when a unique elevation of feeling and nobility of action touches human nature, and people act on motives that seem strange and unbelievable to the more calculating and selfish personalities of later times. It’s a period that seems intended by Providence, not just for itself or the major outcomes it directly causes, but for its impact on the entire future of national existence.[Pg 223] The strong memories of it become part of the nation’s life; they weave into its most routine and habitual thoughts, give a distinctive direction to its feelings; they shape its actions in a unique way; they make its entire historical identity very different from what it would have been without such an epic beginning, without such a superhuman or heroic birth. It provides a reservoir of glorious memories to rejuvenate the national spirit whenever it weakens, as it inevitably does, due to the factious, selfish, and unheroic attitudes brought on by later days of strictly economic or utilitarian success.

This heroic age must pass away. It is sustained, while it lasts, by special influences which can not have place in the common life and ordinary work of humanity. Its continuance, therefore, would be inconsistent with other benefits and other improvements of a more sober or less exciting kind, but which, nevertheless, belong to the proper development of the state. The deep effects, however, still remain. It inspires the poet and the orator. It furnishes the historian with his richest page. It tinges the whole current of the national literature. In fact, there can be no such thing as a national literature, in its truest sense—there can be no national poetry, no true national art, no national music, except as more or less intimately connected with the spirit of such a period.

This heroic age will eventually come to an end. While it lasts, it is supported by influences that can't exist in the everyday life and regular work of humanity. Its continuation would therefore clash with other benefits and improvements that are more practical or less thrilling but still essential for the proper growth of the state. However, the profound effects persist. It inspires poets and orators. It provides historians with their most valuable content. It colors the entire flow of national literature. In fact, there can't be a true national literature—no genuine national poetry, no authentic national art, no national music—except when they are more or less closely linked to the spirit of such a period.

It was not the genius of democracy simply, as Grote and some other historians maintain, but the heroic remembrances of the Persian invasion, that roused the Grecian mind, and created the brilliant period of the Grecian civilization. The new energy that came from this period was felt in every department—of song, of eloquence, of art, and even of philosophy. Marathon and Salamis still sustained the national life when it was waning under the mere political wisdom of Pericles, the factious recklessness of Alcibiades, and the still more debasing influence of the venal demagogues of later times. When this old spirit had gone out, there was nothing in the mere forms of her free institutions that could prevent Athens from sinking down into insignificance, or from being absorbed in the growth of new and rising powers.

It wasn't just the brilliance of democracy, as Grote and some other historians suggest, but the heroic memories of the Persian invasion that inspired the Greek mindset and sparked the amazing period of Greek civilization. The new energy from this era impacted every area—music, rhetoric, art, and even philosophy. The battles of Marathon and Salamis continued to invigorate national spirit even when it was fading under the political savvy of Pericles, the reckless ambition of Alcibiades, and the corrupting influence of later money-driven politicians. Once this old spirit faded, there was nothing in the mere structure of its free institutions that could stop Athens from falling into obscurity or being overtaken by the emergence of new powers.

Rome would never have been the mistress of the world, had it not been for the heroic impetus generated in the events which marked her earliest annals. Even if we are driven to regard these as in a great measure mythical, they still, in the highest and most valid sense, belong to Roman history, and all the efforts of Niebuhr and of Arnold have failed, and ever will fail, to divest them of the rank they have heretofore maintained among the formative influences in the Roman character. They entered into the national memory. They formed for ages the richest and most suggestive part of the national thinking. They became thus more really and vitally incorporated into the national being than many events whose historical authenticity no critic has ever called in question. But we can not believe them wholly or even mainly mythical. Some of the more modern theories on this subject will have to be re-examined. With all their plausibility they are open to the objection of presenting the mightiest effects without adequate or corresponding causes. Twelve hundred years of empire, such as that of Rome, could not well have had its origin in any period marked by events less strangely grand and chivalrous than those that Livy has recorded. Brutus, and Cincinnatus, and Fabricius, must have been as real as the splendid reality which could only have grown out of so heroic an ancestry.[Pg 224] The spirit of Numa more truly ruled, even in the later Roman empire, than did ever that of Augustus. It was yet powerful in the days of Constantine. It was still present in that desperate struggle which made it difficult, even for a Christian senate, to cast out the last vestiges of the old religion, and to banish the Goddess of Victory from the altars and temples she had so long occupied.

Rome would never have become the ruler of the world if it weren't for the heroic spirit sparked by the events of its early history. Even if we see these events as largely mythical, they still significantly shape Roman history, and all the efforts of Niebuhr and Arnold have failed—and will continue to fail—to remove them from their important role in forming the Roman character. They became part of the national memory and formed a rich, thought-provoking aspect of national consciousness for ages. They were more deeply integrated into the nation's identity than many historical events whose authenticity has never been questioned. However, we can't fully accept them as mythical or mainly fictional. Some of the modern theories on this topic need a closer look. Despite their convincing nature, they fail to explain the tremendous outcomes without adequate or corresponding causes. A 1,200-year-long empire like Rome’s couldn’t have originated from a time marked by events less grand and heroic than those recorded by Livy. Figures like Brutus, Cincinnatus, and Fabricius must have been as real as the remarkable reality that could only emerge from such a heroic heritage. The spirit of Numa influenced the later Roman empire more than Augustus ever did. It remained strong even in Constantine's time and was still felt during the struggle to rid the Christian senate of the last remnants of the old religion, and to remove the Goddess of Victory from the altars and temples she had occupied for so long.[Pg 224]

A similar view, drawn from the Jewish history, must commend itself to every one who has even an ordinary knowledge of the Scriptures. The glorious deliverances from Egyptian bondage, the sublime reminiscences of Sinai, the heroic, as exhibited in Moses, and Joshua, and Jephthah, and Gideon, are ever reappearing in the Hebrew prophetic and lyrical poetry. These proud recollections cheer them in the long years of the captivity. Even in the latest and most debasing periods of their history, they impart an almost superhuman energy to their struggle with Rome; and what is more than all, after having sustained the Jewish song, and the Jewish eloquence, during ages of depressing conflict, their influence is still felt in all the noblest departments of Christian art and Christian literature.

A similar perspective, drawn from Jewish history, should resonate with anyone who has even a basic understanding of the Scriptures. The remarkable rescues from Egyptian slavery, the inspiring memories of Sinai, and the heroism shown by figures like Moses, Joshua, Jephthah, and Gideon constantly reappear in Hebrew prophetic and lyrical poetry. These proud memories uplift them during the long years of captivity. Even in the darkest and most humiliating times of their history, they provide an almost superhuman strength in their struggle against Rome; and what’s more, after supporting Jewish song and eloquence through ages of challenging conflict, their impact is still felt in the highest forms of Christian art and Christian literature.

No, we may almost say it, there can not truly be a nation without something that may be called its heroic age; or if there have been such, the want of this necessary fountain of political vitality has been the very reason why they have perished from the pages of history. We, too, have had such a period in our annals, and we are all the better for it, and shall be all the better for it, as long as our political existence shall endure. Some such chapter in our history seems necessary to legitimate our claim to the appellation; and however extravagant it may seem, the assertion may, nevertheless, be hazarded, that one borrowed from the maternal nationality, or from a foreign source, or even altogether mythical, would be better than none at all. If we had not had our Pilgrim Fathers, our Mayflower band, our Plymouth Rock, our Bunker Hill, our Saratoga, our Washingtons, our Warrens, our Putnams, our Montgomerys, our heroic martyr-Congresses, voting with the executioner and the ax before their eyes, we might better have drawn upon the epic imagination for some such introduction to our political existence, than regard it as commencing merely with prosaic paper compacts, or such artificial gatherings as are presented in your unheroic, though very respectable Baltimore and Harrisburg Conventions.

No, we can almost say it, there can't truly be a nation without something that can be called its heroic age; or if there have been such nations, the lack of this essential source of political vitality has been the very reason why they have faded from the pages of history. We, too, have had such a period in our history, and we are all the better for it and will continue to be as long as our political existence lasts. Some chapter in our history seems necessary to legitimize our claim to the title; and however outrageous it may seem, the claim can still be made that one borrowed from the maternal nationality, or from a foreign source, or even entirely mythical, would be better than none at all. If we hadn’t had our Pilgrim Fathers, our Mayflower group, our Plymouth Rock, our Bunker Hill, our Saratoga, our Washingtons, our Warrens, our Putnams, our Montgomerys, our heroic martyr-Congresses, voting with the executioner and the axe before their eyes, we might have been better off drawing from epic imagination for some introduction to our political existence rather than seeing it as starting merely with mundane paper agreements or such artificial gatherings as are presented in your unheroic, though very respectable, Baltimore and Harrisburg Conventions.

Some such chivalrous commencement is, moreover, absolutely essential to that great idea of national continuity, so necessary for the highest ends of political organization; and yet so liable to be impaired or wholly lost in the strife of those ephemeral parties, those ever-gathering, ever-dissolving factions, which, ignoring both the future and the past, are absorbed solely in the magnified interests of the present hour. For this purpose, we want an antiquity of some kind—even though it may not be a distant one—something parted from us by events so grand, so unselfish, so unlike the common, every-day acts of the current years, as to have the appearance at least of a sacred and memory-hallowed remoteness. We need to have our store of glorious olden chronicles, over which time has thrown his robe of reverence—a reverence which no profane criticism of after days shall be allowed to call in question, no subsequent statistics be permitted to impair. We need to have our proud remembrances for all parties, for all interests, for all ages—our common fund of heroic thought, affording a constant supply for the common mind of the state, thus ever living in the[Pg 225] national history, connecting each present not only with such a heroic commencement, but, through it, with all the past that intervenes, and in this way furnishing a historical bond of union stronger than can be found in any amount of compromises or paper constitutions.

Some chivalrous beginning is absolutely essential to that great idea of national continuity, which is necessary for the highest goals of political organization; yet it is so vulnerable to being damaged or entirely lost in the conflict of those temporary parties, those ever-forming, ever-breaking factions, which, ignoring both the future and the past, focus solely on the magnified interests of the present moment. For this reason, we need some form of antiquity—even if it isn’t very distant—something separated from us by events that are so grand, so selfless, and so unlike the everyday actions of recent years, that it at least appears to possess a sacred and revered distance. We should have our collection of glorious old stories, adorned by the passage of time—a respect that no disrespectful criticism from later days should be allowed to challenge, and no future statistics should be permitted to undermine. We need to cherish our proud memories for all groups, for all interests, for all generations—our shared reservoir of heroic thoughts, providing a constant supply for the common understanding of the state, thus always living in the [Pg 225] national history, linking each present moment not only to such a heroic beginning but, through it, to all the past that lies between, creating a historical bond of unity stronger than can be found in any number of compromises or written constitutions.

If we would be truly a State, we must have "the Fathers," and the revered "olden time." It is in some such veneration for a common glorious ancestry that a political organization finds its deepest root. Instead of being absurd, it is the most rational, as well as the most conservative of all feelings in which we can indulge. The more we are under its influence, the higher do we rise in the scale of being above the mere animal state, and that individualism which is its chief characteristic. It is a "good and holy thought" thus to regard the dead as still present with us, and past generations as still having an interest in our history—still justly claiming some voice in the administration of that inheritance they have transmitted to us, and in respect to which our influence over the ages to come will be in proportion to our reverential remembrance of those that have preceded. Such a feeling is the opposite of that banefully radical and disorganizing view which regards the state as a mere aggregation of individual local fragments in space, and a succession of separately-flowing drops in time—which looks upon the present majority of the present generation as representing the whole national existence, and which is, of course, not only inconsistent with any true historical life, but with any thing which is really entitled to the name of fundamental or constitutional law. It is the opposite, both in its nature and its effects, of that contemptible cant now so common in both political parties, and which is ever talking of "Young America" as some new development, unconnected with any thing that has ever gone before it. The heroic men of our revolution, they were "Young America;" the gambling managers of modern political caucuses, to whatever party they may belong, or whatever may be their age or standing, are the real and veritable "old fogies."

If we want to truly be a State, we need to have "the Fathers" and the respected "olden times." It's through a respect for a shared glorious ancestry that a political organization finds its deepest roots. Instead of being nonsensical, this is the most logical and conservative feeling we can embrace. The more influenced we are by it, the more we elevate ourselves above mere animal existence and the individualism that defines it. It's a "good and holy thought" to see the dead as still with us, and past generations as still having a stake in our history—justly claiming some voice in managing the inheritance they passed on to us, with our influence over the future tied to how much we honor those who came before. This feeling stands in direct contrast to the destructive and disorganized view that sees the state as just a collection of individual local fragments in space and a series of separate moments in time—which views the current majority of this generation as the totality of national existence, being inconsistent with any real historical life and anything deserving to be called fundamental or constitutional law. It is the opposite, both in essence and impact, of the ridiculous talk now prevalent in both political parties, frequently discussing "Young America" as if it’s some new phenomenon unrelated to what has come before. The heroic figures of our revolution were "Young America"; the self-serving managers of today's political caucuses, regardless of their party or age, are the true "old fogies."

We can not attach too much importance to this idea of inheritance, so deeply grounded in the human mind. The Sancti Patres are indispensable to a true historical nationality. Hence the classical name for country—Patria a patribusThe Father-land. We love it, not simply for its present enjoyments and present associations, but for its past recollections—

We can't overemphasize the importance of the idea of inheritance, which is so deeply rooted in human thought. The Sancti Patres are essential for a genuine historical identity. That's why we refer to our country as Patria a patribusThe Father-land. We cherish it, not just for the comforts and connections it offers now, but for the memories of its past—

Land of the Pilgrims' pride, Land where our ancestors died.

Without some such thought of transmitted interest continually carrying the past into the present, and both into the future, patriotism is but the cant of the demagogue. Our country is our country, not only in space, but in time—not only territorially, but historically; and it is in this latter aspect it must ever present its most intense and vital interest. Where such an interest is excluded, or unappreciated, there is nothing elevated, nothing heroic, to which the name of patriotism can be given. There is nothing but the most momentary selfishness which can bind our affections to one spot on earth more than to any other.

Without some kind of ongoing connection to our shared interests that brings the past into the present, and both into the future, patriotism is just the empty rhetoric of a demagogue. Our country is our country, not just in terms of geography, but also in terms of history; it’s in this historical context that it holds the strongest and most significant interest. When this sense of interest is missing or unrecognized, there’s nothing noble, nothing heroic, that can truly be called patriotism. It simply becomes a fleeting selfishness that ties our feelings to one place on Earth more than to any other.

Opposed to this is a species of cosmopolitanism, which sometimes claims the Scriptures as being on its side. The opinion, however, will not stand the test of fair interpretation. The Bible, it is true, enjoins love to all mankind, but not as a blind and abstract philanthropy which would pass over all the intermediate gradations that Infinite Wisdom has appointed. Love of "the fathers," love of family,[Pg 226] love of kindred, love of "our own people"—"our own, our native land"—our "own Zion," nationally, as well as ecclesiastically, are commended, not only as good in themselves, but as the foundation of all the other social virtues, as the appointed means, in fact, by which the circle of the affections is legitimately expanded, and, at the same time, with a preservation of that intensity of feeling which is never found in any inflating abstract cosmopolitan benevolence.

Opposed to this is a form of cosmopolitanism that sometimes claims the Scriptures support its views. However, this interpretation doesn’t hold up under fair scrutiny. It's true that the Bible promotes love for all humanity, but not as a blind and vague philanthropy that overlooks the important relationships that Infinite Wisdom has established. Love for "the forefathers," love for family, love for relatives, love for "our own people"—"our own, our native land"—and our "own Zion," both nationally and ecclesiastically, are encouraged not just as good in themselves but as the foundation of all other social virtues. They are actually the intended means by which the circle of affection can be rightly expanded, while still maintaining a level of emotional intensity that you won’t find in any broad, abstract cosmopolitan goodwill.

In no book, too, do we find more distinctly set forth that idea which we have styled the root of all true patriotism—the idea of the national continuance from generation to generation, as a living, responsible whole—as one ever-flowing stream, in which the individual parts are passing away, it is true but evermore passing to that "congregation of the fathers" which still lives in the present organic life. It is presented, too, not as any difficult or transcendental or mystical conception, but as a thought belonging everywhere to the common mind, and necessarily underlying all those dread views the Scripture so often give us of national accountability and national retribution.

In no book do we find a clearer expression of the idea we refer to as the foundation of true patriotism—the idea of a nation’s continuity from one generation to the next, as a living, responsible whole—like an ever-flowing stream, where individual parts may fade away, but they are continually contributing to the "congregation of the fathers" that still exists in our current collective life. This idea is also presented not as something complicated, abstract, or mystical, but as a concept that is universally understood and fundamentally supports the serious perspectives Scripture often offers regarding national accountability and national consequences.

Every country distinguished for great deeds has ever been proud of its ancestors; has ever gloried in the facts of its early history; has ever connected them with whatever was glorious in its later annals has ever made them the boast of its eloquence, the themes of its poetry, and the subjects of festal rejoicings. In the preservation of such feelings and such ideas, our annual Fourth of July celebrations instead of being useless, and worse than useless periods of noisy declamation, as some would contend, are, in fact, doing more to preserve our union than the strongest legislative acts. This may hold when every other cable in the vessel has parted. The bare thought that our glorious old Fourth of July could never more be celebrated in its true spirit (and it would be equally gone for each and every sundered fragment) is enough to check the wildest faction, and to stay the hand of the most reckless disunionist.

Every country known for great achievements has always taken pride in its ancestors; has always celebrated the events of its early history; has always linked them to whatever was remarkable in its later stories. It has always made them the source of its eloquence, the subjects of its poetry, and the themes of its festive celebrations. In preserving such feelings and ideas, our annual Fourth of July celebrations, rather than being pointless and, worse, counterproductive noisy speeches as some claim, actually do more to maintain our union than the strongest laws. This holds true even when every other connection has failed. The mere thought that our wonderful old Fourth of July could never again be celebrated in its true spirit (and it would be just as lost for any divided part) is enough to temper the wildest factions and to restrain the most reckless advocates of division.

It was in view of such an effect, that one of our wisest statesmen, one the farthest removed from the demagogue, and himself a participator in our heroic struggle, is represented as so enthusiastically commending this annual festival to the perpetual observation of posterity, "Through the thick gloom of the present," he exclaims, "I see the brightness of the future as the sun in heaven. We shall make this a glorious, an immortal day. When we are in our graves our children will honor it. They will celebrate it with thanksgiving, with festivity, with bonfires, and illuminations. On its annual return, they will shed tears, copious, gushing tears of exultation of gratitude, and of joy." "And so that day shall be honored," continues his eloquent eulogist—"And so that day shall be honored, illustrious prophet and patriot! so that day shall be honored, and as often as it returns thy renown shall come along with it, and the glory of thy life, like the day of thy death, shall not fail from the remembrance of men!"

It was with this in mind that one of our wisest leaders, someone who was far from a demagogue and who played a part in our heroic struggle, enthusiastically recommended this annual festival be celebrated forever. "Through the thick darkness of the present," he exclaimed, "I see the brightness of the future like the sun in the sky. We will make this a glorious, an immortal day. When we are gone, our children will honor it. They will celebrate it with gratitude, festivities, bonfires, and lights. Each year, they will shed tears—abundant, overflowing tears of joy, gratitude, and celebration." "And so that day shall be honored," continues his passionate speaker—"And so that day shall be honored, illustrious prophet and patriot! So that day shall be honored, and every time it comes around, your fame will return with it, and the glory of your life, like the day of your death, will never fade from people's memory!"

The highest reason, then, as well as the purest feeling, bid us not be ashamed of glorying in our forefathers. Scripture is in unison here with patriotism in commending the sacred sentiment. There is a religious element in the true love of race and country. "The God of our Fathers" becomes a prime article of the national as well as of the ecclesiastical creed, and without the feeling inspired by it, nationality may turn out to be a mere figment, which all political bandages will fail to sustain against the disorganizing[Pg 227] influence of factious or sectional interests. It is not absurd, too, to cherish the belief that our ancestors were better men than ourselves, if we ourselves are truly made better by thus believing.

The highest reason, as well as the purest feeling, encourages us not to be ashamed of taking pride in our ancestors. The Bible aligns with patriotism in celebrating this important sentiment. There’s a spiritual aspect in the genuine love of our race and country. "The God of our Fathers" becomes a key part of both our national and religious beliefs, and without the feelings it inspires, our sense of nationality could end up being nothing more than an illusion, which no political solutions will be able to hold against the disruptive influence of conflicting or regional interests. It’s not unreasonable to believe that our ancestors were better people than we are, especially if believing this truly makes us better.

As we have remarked before, there may be mythical exaggeration attending such tradition, but if so, this very exaggeration must have had its ground in something really transcending what takes place in the ordinary course of a nation's life. Some late German scholars have been hunting out depreciating charges against the hero of Marathon, and, for this purpose, have subjected his very ashes to the most searching critical analysis. Truth, it may be said, is always sacred. We would not wish to undervalue the importance of the sentiment. But Miltiades the patriot is the real element that exerted so heroic an effect upon the subsequent Grecian history. Miltiades charged with political offenses lives only as the subject of antiquarian research, or a humiliating example of the common depravity appearing among the most lauded of mankind. And so, in our own case, what political utility can there be in discovering, even if it were so, that Washington was not so wise, or Warren so brave, or Putnam so adventurous, or Bunker Hill so heroically contested, as has been believed? Away with such skepticism, we say, and the mousing criticism by which it is sometimes attempted to be supported. Such beliefs have at all events become real for us by entering into the very soul of our history, and forming the staple of our national thought. To take them away would now be a baneful disorganizing of the national mind. Their influence has been felt in every subsequent event. Saratoga and Monmouth have reappeared in Chippewa, and New Orleans, and Buena Vista. May it not be hoped, too, that something of the men who convened in Philadelphia on the 4th of July, 1776, or of that earlier band on whom Burke pronounced his splendid eulogy, may still live, even in the worst and poorest of our modern Congresses!

As we've mentioned before, there might be some mythical exaggeration surrounding this tradition, but if that's the case, that exaggeration must have been rooted in something truly extraordinary that goes beyond what typically happens in a nation's life. Some recent German scholars have been digging up negative claims about the hero of Marathon, putting his very ashes under intense scrutiny. It's fair to say that truth is always important. We don't want to downplay the significance of that belief. But Miltiades, the patriot, is the real reason he had such a heroic impact on later Greek history. Miltiades, charged with political offenses, exists only as a subject of historical research or as a disgraceful example of the flaws found even among the most celebrated people. So, in our case, what good would it do to find out, even if it were true, that Washington was not as wise, or Warren not as brave, or Putnam not as adventurous, or that the battle of Bunker Hill wasn't fought as heroically as we believe? We reject such skepticism and the nitpicking criticism that sometimes tries to back it up. These beliefs have become real for us, shaping the essence of our history and forming the basis of our national identity. Taking them away now would be a harmful disruption of the national mindset. Their influence has been felt in every subsequent event. Saratoga and Monmouth have resurfaced in battles like Chippewa, New Orleans, and Buena Vista. Can we not hope that some spirit of the men who gathered in Philadelphia on July 4, 1776, or that earlier group praised so eloquently by Burke, still lives on, even in the least inspiring and most flawed of our modern Congresses?

Again, this reverence for "the fathers" is the most healthfully conservative of all influences, because it presents the common sacred ground on which all political parties, all sectional divisions, and all religious denominations can heartily unite. Every such difference ought to give way, and, in general, does give way, in the presence of the healing spirit that comes to us from the remembrance of those old heroic times. The right thinking Episcopalian not only acquiesces, but rejoices cordially in the praises of the Pilgrim Fathers. He can glory even in their stern puritanism, without losing a particle of reverence or respect for his own cherished views. The Presbyterian glows with pride at the mention of the cavaliers of Virginia, and sees in their ancient loyalty the strength and consistency of their modern republicanism. The most rigid Churchman of either school—whether of Canterbury or Geneva—finds his soul refreshed by the thought of that more than martial heroism which distinguished the followers of Penn and the first colonists of Pennsylvania.

Once again, this respect for "the fathers" is the most beneficially conservative of all influences because it offers a common sacred ground where all political parties, regional differences, and religious groups can genuinely come together. Any such division should give way, and usually does, in the face of the healing spirit that comes from remembering those old heroic times. A right-minded Episcopalian not only accepts but also happily embraces the praises of the Pilgrim Fathers. He can take pride even in their strict puritanism without losing any reverence or respect for his own cherished beliefs. The Presbyterian beams with pride at the mention of the Virginia cavaliers and sees in their historical loyalty the strength and consistency of modern republicanism. The most traditional Churchman from either school—whether from Canterbury or Geneva—feels uplifted by the thought of the extraordinary heroism that distinguished the followers of Penn and the early colonists of Pennsylvania.

Our rapid editorial view has been suggested by the great festal period of the current month; but we can not close it without the expression of one thought which we deem of the highest importance. If the influences coming from this heroic age of our history are so very precious, we should be careful not to diminish their true conservative power, by associating them with every wretched imitation for which there may be claimed the same or a similar name. The memory of our revolution (to which we could show, if time permitted, there should be given a truer and a nobler epithet) is greatly lowered by being compared[Pg 228] continually with every miserable Cuban expedition and Canadian invasion, or every European émeute, without any reference to the grounds on which they are attempted, or the characters and motives of those by whom they are commenced. We may indeed sympathize with every true effort to burst the hard bonds of irresponsible power; but we should carefully see to it that our own sacred deposit of glorious national reminiscences lose not all its reverence by being brought out for too common uses, or profaned by too frequent comparison with that which is really far below it, if not altogether of a different kind. When Washington and Greene and Franklin are thus placed side by side with Lopez, and Ledru-Rollin, and Louis Blanc, or a profane parallel is run between the Pilgrim colonists and modern Socialists and St. Simonians, there is only an inevitable degradation on the one side without any true corresponding elevation on the other. They are the enemies of our revolution, and of its true spirit, who are thus for making it subservient to all purposes that may be supposed to bear the least resemblance. Our fathers' struggle, be it ever remembered, was not for the subversion but the conservation of constitutional law, and, therefore, even its most turbulent and seemingly lawless acts acquire a dignity placing them above all vulgar reference, and all vulgar imitation. He is neither a patriot nor a philanthropist who would compare the destruction of the tea in the harbor of Boston with every abolition riot, or every resistance to our own solemnly enacted laws, or every lynching mob that chooses to caricature the forms of justice, or every French émeute, or revolutionary movement with its mock heroics—its burlesque travestie of institutions it can not comprehend, and of a liberty for which it so soon shows itself utterly unqualified. It is our mission to redeem and elevate mankind, by showing that the spirit of our heroic times lives constantly in the political institutions to which they gave birth, and that republican forms are perfectly consistent, not only with personal liberty, but with all those higher ideas that are connected with the conservation of law, of reverence, of loyalty, of rational submission to right authority—in a word, of true self-government, as the positive antithesis to that animal and counterfeit thing—the government of self. It is not the conservative who is staying the true progress of mankind. A licentious press, a corrupt and gambling spirit of faction in our political parties, and, above all, frequent exhibitions of vulgar demagoguism in our legislative bodies, may do more to strengthen and perpetuate the European monarchies, than all the ignorance of their subjects, and all the power of their armies.

Our quick editorial perspective has been influenced by the major festival happening this month; however, we can't wrap this up without sharing one thought that we consider crucial. If the inspirations from this heroic time in our history are so valuable, we need to be cautious not to weaken their true conservation power by linking them with every pathetic imitation that might claim the same or a similar title. The legacy of our revolution (which, given the time, we could argue deserves a truer and nobler description) is significantly diminished when it’s continuously compared with every unfortunate Cuban expedition and Canadian invasion, or every European émeute, without considering the reasons behind them or the characters and motivations of those involved. We can certainly sympathize with any genuine effort to break free from the harsh grip of unaccountable power; however, we must ensure that our own cherished legacy of glorious national memories doesn’t lose its respect by being used too casually or tarnished by too frequent comparisons to something that is truly far beneath it, if not entirely different. When Washington, Greene, and Franklin are placed alongside Lopez, Ledru-Rollin, and Louis Blanc, or a disrespectful comparison is drawn between the Pilgrim colonists and modern Socialists and St. Simonians, it only leads to a degradation on one side without any genuine elevation on the other. Those who make our revolution subservient to any purpose that might appear to have even the faintest resemblance are the true enemies of its spirit. Let us remember that our forefathers' struggle was not for the overthrow but for the preservation of constitutional law, and therefore, even its most disorderly and seemingly lawless actions possess a dignity that elevates them above all mundane references and imitations. A person is neither a patriot nor a philanthropist who equates the destruction of the tea in Boston harbor with every abolition riot, every defiance of our solemnly enacted laws, every lynching mob that distorts the forms of justice, or every French émeute, or revolutionary movement with its mock heroics—its ridiculous parody of institutions it cannot understand, and of a liberty for which it soon proves itself utterly unfit. Our mission is to uplift humanity by demonstrating that the spirit of our heroic time lives on in the political institutions they established, and that republican forms are fully compatible not only with personal freedom but also with all those higher principles connected to the preservation of law, reverence, loyalty, and rational submission to rightful authority—in short, true self-government, as the clear opposite of that base and counterfeit idea—the government of self. It is not the conservative who hinders the genuine progress of humanity. A reckless press, a corrupt and gambling spirit of faction in our political parties, and, most importantly, repeated displays of crass demagoguery in our legislative bodies may do more to uphold and entrench European monarchies than all the ignorance of their subjects and the might of their armies.


Editor's Armchair.

An Easy Chair for July, and specially for such hot July, as we doubt not is just now ripening over our readers' heads, should be a cool chair, with a lining of leather, rather than the soft plushes which beguile the winter of its iciness. Just so, we should be on the look-out in these hap-hazard pages, that close our monthly labors, for what may be cooling in the way of talk; and should make our periods wear such shadows as will be grateful to our sun-beaten readers.

An Easy Chair for July, especially for this hot July that we’re sure is currently heating up over our readers' heads, should be a cool chair with a leather lining, rather than the soft plush that tricks us during the winter’s chill. Similarly, we should be on the lookout in these random pages that wrap up our monthly work for anything refreshing in terms of conversation; and we should make our sentences carry such nuances that will be appreciated by our sun-baked readers.

If by a touch of the pen, we could, for instance, build up a grove of leaf-covered trees, with some pebble-bottomed brook fretting below—idly, carelessly, impetuously—even as our pen goes fretting over this Paris feuille; and if we could steep our type in[Pg 229] that summer fragrance which lends itself to the country groves of July; and if we could superadd—like so many fragmentary sparkles of verse—the songs of July birds—what a claimant of your thanks we should become?

If with just a stroke of the pen, we could, for example, create a grove of lush trees, with a pebble-strewn brook flowing beneath—carefree, thoughtless, rushing—just as our pen moves over this Paris feuille; and if we could soak our words in[Pg 229] that summer scent that matches the country groves of July; and if we could sprinkle in—like little bursts of poetry—the songs of July birds—how grateful you would be to us!

Much as a man may be street-ridden, after long city experience—even as the old and rheumatic become bed-ridden—yet the far-off shores of Hoboken, and the tree-whispers of St. John's and Grammercy Parks, do keep alive somewhat of the Eden longings, which are born into the world with us, and which can only die when our hearts are dead.

Much like a guy who’s spent too long in the city can feel confined to the streets—even like the elderly and arthritic who can’t leave their beds—still, the distant shores of Hoboken and the rustling leaves in St. John's and Gramercy Parks keep some of those Eden desires alive that we’re born with and that only fade away when our hearts stop beating.

And hence it is that we find it a loving duty to linger much and often as we may in this sunny season of the year (alas, that it should be only in imagination!) around rural haunts—plucking flowers with broad-bonneted girls—studying shadows with artist eye—brushing the dews away with farmers' boys—lolling in pools with sleek-limbed cattle—dropping worms or minnow with artist anglers, and humming to ourselves, in the soft and genial spirit of the scene, such old-time pleasant verses as these:

And so, we feel it's a wonderful duty to spend plenty of time imagining ourselves in this sunny season of the year (if only in our minds!) around countryside spots—picking flowers with girls in wide-brimmed hats—observing shadows with an artist's eye—wiping the dew away with farm boys—relaxing by ponds with sleek cattle—fishing for worms or minnows with fellow anglers, and humming to ourselves, in the warm and friendly vibe of the moment, such nostalgic verses as these:

The tall woods, the forests vast and extensive,
Decorated with fresh, green leaves and branches,
In their cool spots, the birds sing many songs Do welcome the queen of summer with their choir; The beautiful meadows, where Flora's gifts among Are mixed with green grass in between;
The silver-scaled fish that glide gently In the clear, sparkling waters of the lovely brook.
All of these and many more of His creations
That created the heavens, the fisherman often sees; Taking great delight, To consider how odd and amazing they are; Framing, therefore, an inner reflection,
To free his heart from other distractions; And while he looks at these with a joyful eye,
His mind is captivated by the starry sky.

And since we are thus in the humor of old and rural-imaged verse—notwithstanding the puff and creak of the printing enginery is coming up from the caverns below us (a very Vulcan to the Venus of our thought) we shall ask your thanks for yet another triad of verses, which will (if you be not utterly barren) breed daisies on your vision.

And since we’re in the mood for old-fashioned, countryside poetry—even though we can hear the noise of the printing machines operating beneath us (like a Vulcan to the Venus of our thoughts)—we're going to ask for your appreciation for yet another set of three poems, which will (if you’re not completely uninspired) bring forth daisies in your mind's eye.

The poet has spoken of such omnibus drives and Perrine pavements as offended good sense two or three hundred years ago:

The poet has mentioned those all-inclusive drives and Perrine sidewalks that would have shocked common sense two or three hundred years ago:

Let those who desire these pleasures go after them,
And indulge their silly desires to their heart's content; So I can see the green fields and meadows,
And by the fresh rivers, you can walk whenever you want,
Among the daisies and the blue violets,
Red hyacinth and yellow daffodil, Purple narcissus like the morning rays,
Pale ganderglass and blue culverkeys.
I find it more enjoyable to see The beautiful expanse of the high sky; And in the middle of it all, like burning gold,
The fiery chariot of the world's great eye; The watery clouds that rolled up in the air With various kinds of painted colors fly; And beautiful Aurora raising her head,
All the blushes come from the old Tithonus' bed.
The hills and mountains arose from the plains,
The plains stretched flat with the ground,
The ground split into various veins,
The valleys surrounded by flowing rivers, The rivers flowing through Nature's chains,
With a reckless rush into the deep sea; The rising sea below the low valleys,
The sweet valleys and lakes that flow gently.

The reader may thank us for a seasonable bouquet—tied up with old ribbon indeed, and in the old free and easy way—but the perfume is richer than the artificial scents of your modern verse.

The reader might appreciate our timely bouquet—tied up with an old ribbon, sure, and in a casual way—but the fragrance is deeper than the artificial scents of today’s poetry.


We do not know who first gave the epithet "leafy June;" but the goodness of the term was never so plain, as through that twelfthlet of the year which has just shadowed our paths. Whether it be the heavy rains of the early spring, or an over-luxurious outburst from the over-stiff chains of the last winter—certain it is, that the trees never bore up such heaviness of green, or the grass promised such height and "bottom." And we can not forbear the hope, that the exceeding beauty of the summer will stimulate the activity and benevolence of those guardians of our city joy, in whose hands lies the fate of the "Up-town Park."

We don't know who first called it "leafy June," but the beauty of the term has never been clearer than during this twelfth month of the year that has just passed us by. Whether it's the heavy rains of early spring or an excessive burst of life breaking free from the last winter's grip, it's certain that the trees have never shown such a richness of green, nor has the grass looked so lush and full. We can't help but hope that the incredible beauty of summer will inspire the efforts and generosity of those responsible for our city's joy, who hold the future of the "Up-town Park" in their hands.


And as we speak of parks, comes up a thought of that very elegant monument to the memory of Washington, which has risen out of the brains of imaginative and venturesome people, any time during the last fifty years. The affair seems to have a periodic and somewhat whimsical growth. We suffer a kind of intermittent Washingtonianism, which now and then shows a very fever of drawings, and of small subscriptions; and anon, the chill takes us, and shakes the whole fabric to the ground.

And as we talk about parks, I can't help but think of that elegant monument honoring Washington, which has come from the minds of creative and daring individuals over the past fifty years. It seems to have a quirky and irregular development. We experience a sort of on-and-off Washington enthusiasm, which at times shows a surge of sketches and small donations; then suddenly, the excitement fades, and the entire project collapses.

We can not but regard it as a very unfavorable symptom, that a corner-stone should have been laid some two or three years ago in a quarter called Hamilton Square, and that extraordinary energy should have pushed forward the monumental design to the height of a few feet.

We can't help but see it as a very bad sign that a cornerstone was laid about two or three years ago in an area known as Hamilton Square, and that a surprising amount of effort has only managed to advance the monumental design to just a few feet.

Since that period a debility has prevailed. The Washington sentiment has languished painfully—proving to our mind most satisfactorily, that the true Washington enthusiasm is periodic in its growth; and that to secure healthful alternations of recruit and exuberance, it should—like asparagus—be cut off below ground.

Since that time, a weakness has taken hold. The feeling for Washington has dwindled painfully, clearly showing us that true enthusiasm for Washington grows in cycles. To ensure healthy changes of renewal and excitement, it should—like asparagus—be cut off at the roots.

Meantime, the strangers and office-seekers of our great capital, are doing somewhat toward redeeming the fame of the country. In connection with their design, a suggestion is just now bruited of calling upon clergymen, this coming Fourth of July (three days hence, bear in mind) to drop a hint to the memory of the hero who has made that day the Sunday of our political year, and furthermore, to drop such pennies, as his parishioners will bestow, into the Washington monumental fund.

In the meantime, the newcomers and those seeking positions in our great capital are doing their part to improve the country's reputation. There's a current suggestion to ask clergymen this upcoming Fourth of July (just three days away, remember) to pay tribute to the hero who has made that day the highlight of our political calendar, and additionally, to collect whatever donations their parishioners can offer for the Washington monument fund.

We should be untrue to the chit-chat of the hour—as well as to our Washington fervor—if we did not give the suggestion a record, and the purpose a benison!

We would be dishonest to the conversations of the moment—and to our enthusiasm for Washington—if we didn’t document the suggestion and bless the purpose!


It is fortunate for all minor matters—such as Jenny Lind, Kossuth, green-peas, strawberries, and Lola Montez—that our President-making comes only by quartettes of years. It is painful to think of the monotone of talk which would overtake the world, if Baltimore Conventions were held monthly or even yearly.

It’s a good thing that presidential elections only happen every four years for all the little things—like Jenny Lind, Kossuth, green peas, strawberries, and Lola Montez. It’s hard to imagine the boring conversations that would take over if the Baltimore Conventions were held every month or even every year.

We are writing now in the eye of the time; and can give no guess as to what candidates will emerge from the Baltimore ballot-boxes; but when this shall come under our reader's eye, two names only will form the foci of his political fears and hopes. Without any predilections whatever, we most ardently wish that our reader may not be disappointed—however his hopes may tend: and if any editor in the land can "trim" to his readers' humor, with greater sincerity, and larger latitude, we should like to know it.

We are writing at this moment in history; and we can’t predict which candidates will come out of the Baltimore ballot boxes. But by the time this reaches our readers, only two names will be the center of their political concerns and aspirations. Without any bias at all, we sincerely hope that our readers will not be let down—no matter where their hopes lie. And if there’s any editor out there who can cater to their readers’ preferences with more sincerity and freedom, we’d love to hear about it.


Ole Bull has been delighting the musical world, in his way, for the month last gone, and has made[Pg 231] more converts to the violin, by the fullness of his faith, and the fervor of his action, than many preachers can win over, by like qualities, to any labor of love.

Ole Bull has been enchanting the music scene in his unique way for the past month and has gained[Pg 231]more fans for the violin, through his deep passion and enthusiastic performances, than many preachers can convert to any cause through similar qualities.

The truth is, there lies in this Scandinavian a heartiness of impulse, and an exuberance of soul, which makes the better part of what men call genius. You have a conviction—as you listen—that you are dependent for your delight upon no nice conformity with rules—no precision of compliance—no formulary excellence, but only and solely upon the spirit of the man, creeping over him to the very finger-tips, and making music and melody of very necessity.

The truth is, in this Scandinavian, there’s a warmth of emotion and a vibrant spirit that makes up the core of what people call genius. As you listen, you get the sense that your enjoyment doesn’t rely on strict adherence to rules, exact compliance, or any set standards of excellence, but rather solely on the man’s spirit, flowing through him to his fingertips and creating music and melody naturally.

There is a freshness, a wildness, a fierté in the harmonies that Ole Bull creates, which appeal not alone to your nice students of flats and sharps, but to every ear that ever heard a river flowing, or the soughing of pine woods. It is a make-piece—not of Donizetti's arias—but of that unceasing and musical hum which is going up every summer's day in the way of bee-chants, and bird-anthems, and which the soul-wakened Scandinavian has caught, and wrought and strung upon five bits of thread!

There’s a freshness, a wildness, a fierté in the harmonies that Ole Bull creates, which appeal not only to the trained musicians but to anyone who has ever heard a river flowing or the rustling of pine trees. It’s a masterpiece—not of Donizetti's arias—but of that continuous and melodic hum that rises every summer day, filled with bee songs and bird anthems, which the soul-awakened Scandinavian has captured, crafted, and strung together on five threads!

The papers (they are accountable for whatever may not be true in our stories) have told us strange, sad things of the musical hero's life. First, that he has been a great patron of the arts—nor is it easy to believe that he could be otherwise. Next, they have told us, that he is an earnest lover of such liberty as makes men think, and read, and till their own lands—nor is this hard to believe. Again they tell us that he has sometimes rendered himself obnoxious to the powers that be—that his estates, once very large, have been confiscated, and that he has come hitherward only for the sake of repairing his altered fortunes.

The news articles (they are responsible for anything that might not be true in our stories) have shared some strange, sad details about the musician's life. First, they've said that he has been a major supporter of the arts—it's hard to believe he could be anything else. Next, they’ve told us that he genuinely values the kind of freedom that encourages people to think, read, and work their own land—this seems believable. They also claim that he has sometimes gotten on the bad side of those in power—that his once-large estates have been taken away, and that he has come here solely to try to repair his changed circumstances.

If the truth lie indeed so hardly upon him, we wish him even more success than his merit will be sure to win.

If the truth really weighs so heavily on him, we wish him even more success than he definitely deserves.

Among the on dits of the time, we must not pass by the good and ill-natured comments upon the new-passed Liquor Laws of Massachusetts and of Rhode Island. When the reader remembers that Nahant and Newport are within the limits of these two States, and that summer visitors to the favorite watering places are not unapt to call for a wine-card, and to moisten their roast lamb and peas (especially after an exhilarating sea-bath) with a cup of Heidseck, or of Longworth's sparkling Catawba, they may readily imagine the consternation that has crept over certain portions of the visiting world. We (meaning we as Editors) are of course without any preferences either for watering places or—for that matter—liquoring places. Yet we are curious to see how far the new system will favor the fullness and the gayety of the old summer resorts.

Among the on dits of the time, we can't ignore the positive and negative comments about the recently enacted Liquor Laws in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. When you remember that Nahant and Newport are within these states, and that summer visitors to these popular spots often ask for a wine list to enjoy with their roast lamb and peas (especially after a refreshing sea bath) alongside a glass of Heidseck or Longworth's sparkling Catawba, you can easily imagine the shock that has spread through certain parts of the visiting crowd. We (as Editors) don't have any favorites when it comes to summer destinations or— for that matter— places to drink. However, we're curious to see how this new system will impact the vibrancy and excitement of the traditional summer resorts.

Persistent Newport visitors, who have grown old with their sherry and their port, are arranging for the transportation of "small stores," as a portion of their luggage; and are negotiating with the landlords their rates of "corkage." Whether this side-tax on the matter will not render host and guest obnoxious to the new-started laws, is a matter we commend to the serious attention of the hopeful lawyers of Newport.

Persistent visitors to Newport, who have aged alongside their sherry and port, are making plans to bring "small supplies" as part of their luggage and are discussing corkage fees with their landlords. Whether this extra charge will make hosts and guests vulnerable to the newly established laws is something we leave for the attentive consideration of Newport’s aspiring lawyers.

What the reformatory legal enactments may do with the wine-growers of Ohio, and with the distillers of Pennsylvania and Indiana, we are curious to see. As for the latter, we can not say (speaking now in our individual capacity) that we should greatly regret the downfall of those huge distillery pig-yards, which spend their odors over the Ohio river; but as for the Cincinnati wines and vineyards, we[Pg 232] must confess that we have a lurking fondness that way—first, because the grape culture is Scriptural, beautiful, healthful; and next, because it is clothing the hill-sides of our West with a purple and bountiful product, that develops nobly the agricultural resources of the country, and throws the gauntlet in the very face of Burgundy. Still again, we have a fancy—perhaps a wrong one—that pure wines, well made, and cheapened to the wants of the humblest laborer, will outgrow and overshadow that feverish passion for stronger drink which vitiates so sadly our whole working population: and yet once again, we have charity for western vineyards, for a very love of their products; and have felt ourselves, after a wee bit of the quiet hock which Zimmermann presses out of the ripe Catawba—a better feeling toward our fellows, and a richer relish for such labor of the office as now hampers our pen.

What the new legal reforms might do to the wine-growers of Ohio and the distillers of Pennsylvania and Indiana is something we're eager to see. Regarding the latter, I can’t say (speaking for myself now) that I would be too upset about the decline of those large distillery pig-farms that spread their odors across the Ohio River; however, when it comes to the Cincinnati wines and vineyards, I must admit there's a hidden fondness there—first, because grape growing is biblical, beautiful, and healthy; and second, because it’s covering the hills of our West with a rich and plentiful harvest that enhances our country’s agricultural strengths and stands boldly against Burgundy. Furthermore, I have a hope—perhaps a misguided one—that quality wines, made well and priced for even the most modest laborer, will surpass and eliminate the unhealthy obsession with stronger alcohol that so negatively affects our entire working population. Yet again, I have goodwill toward western vineyards simply out of a love for their products; after just a little of the smooth hock that Zimmermann makes from ripe Catawba grapes, I’ve felt a stronger connection to my fellow humans and a greater enjoyment for the kind of office work that currently holds up my writing.


Under story of pleasure-seeking for the summer, some Journalists record the intent of a southern party to broach—in the August that now lies thirty days into the sunshine—the passage of the Rocky Mountains, skirting by the way the miniature valley of the Missouri—wearing weapons of defense and offense—carrying parlors upon wheels, and kitchens in their carts—shooting rabbits and Indians as the seasons vary, and dining upon buffalo and corn bread à volanté.

Under the story of seeking pleasure for the summer, some journalists report that a southern group plans to discuss—in the August that is now just thirty days away—the crossing of the Rocky Mountains, passing through the small valley of the Missouri. They’ll be armed for both defense and offense, traveling in mobile homes with kitchens in their carts, hunting rabbits and Indians as the seasons change, and feasting on buffalo and cornbread as much as they want.

We wish them much pleasure of the trip—meaning good roads, few Indians, and musquito bars.

We wish them a great time on their trip—hoping for smooth roads, no encounters with Native Americans, and mosquito nets.

Seriously, however, when shall we see the valley of the Missouri form a pleasant tangent to summer travel, and the sportsman who now camps it by Long Lake, or shoots coot by Moniment Point—oiling his rifle for a range at the stalking varmint by St. Joseph's, and along the thousand forked branches of the Missouri waters?

Seriously, though, when will we see the Missouri Valley become a great spot for summer travel? The outdoors enthusiast who currently camps by Long Lake or hunts coots at Moniment Point—cleaning his rifle for a shot at the sneaky animal near St. Joseph's, and along the many winding branches of the Missouri waters?

At Minnessota, they say (the doubtful newspapers again,) people have discovered a gem of a lake,—so still, that the bordering trees seem growing root upward, and the islands are all Siamesed where they float; and so clear that you count your fish before you throw them the bait, and make such selections among the eager patrons of your hook, as you would do at the City market on the corner of Spring-street.

At Minnesota, they say (according to the skeptical newspapers again) that people have found a stunning lake—so calm that the surrounding trees seem to be growing upside down, and the islands are all intertwined where they float; and so clear that you can count your fish before you even throw out the bait, making such choices among the eager fish at your hook as you would do at the city market on the corner of Spring Street.

When Professor Page's Galvanic Railroad will take us there in a day, we will wash the ink from our fingers in the lake of Minnessota; and if the fates favor us, will stew a trout in Longworth's Catawba; meantime, we wait hopefully feeding upon Devoe's, moderately fatted mutton, and great plenty of imaginative diet.

When Professor Page's Galvanic Railroad takes us there in a day, we’ll wash the ink off our fingers in the lake of Minnesota; and if luck is on our side, we’ll cook a trout in Longworth's Catawba; in the meantime, we wait hopefully, enjoying Devoe's moderately fat lamb and plenty of imaginative food.


Among the rest, old Markham's "Summer Contentments" has furnished us with rare meals, and inveigled us into trying with inapt hands the metier of the rod and angle. We flatter ourselves that we have won upon the character of the angler, however little we may win upon his fish.

Among the others, old Markham's "Summer Contentments" has given us some amazing meals and tempted us to awkwardly try our hand at fishing with a rod and line. We like to think that we've made some progress with the skills of an angler, even if our catch is meager.

"He must," says pleasant old Markham, "neither be amazed with storms, nor frighted with thunder; and if he is not temperate, but has a gnawing stomach, that will not endure much fasting, and must observe hours, it troubleth the mind and body, and loseth that delight which only maketh pastime pleasing.

"He must," says pleasant old Markham, "neither be surprised by storms nor scared by thunder; and if he's not moderate but has a rumbling stomach that can't handle much fasting and needs to stick to regular meal times, it stresses both the mind and body, and takes away the enjoyment that makes leisure time enjoyable."

"He must be of a well-settled and constant belief, to enjoy the benefit of his expectation; for than to despair, it were better never to be put in practice: and he must ever think, when the waters are pleasant, and any thing likely, that there the Creator of all good things, hath stored up much of plenty; and[Pg 233] though your satisfaction be not as ready as your wishes, yet you must hope still, that with perseverance you shall reap the fullness of your harvest with contentment. Then he must be full of love both to his pleasure, and his neighbor—to his pleasure, which will otherwise be irksome and tedious—and to his neighbor, that he never give offense in any particular, nor be guilty of any general destruction; then he must be exceeding patient, and neither vex nor excruciate himself with any losses or mischances, as in losing the prey when it is almost in hand, or by breaking his tools by ignorance or negligence; but with pleased sufferance amend errors, and think mischances instructions to better carefulness."

"He needs to have a strong and steady belief to enjoy the benefits of his expectations; because it’s better never to try than to fall into despair. He should always think that when things are going well and looking promising, the Creator of all good things has stored up plenty. And[Pg 233] even if your satisfaction doesn’t come as quickly as you’d like, you must still hope that with perseverance, you will enjoy the fullness of your rewards with contentment. He should be full of love for both his happiness and his neighbors—toward his happiness, which would otherwise feel burdensome, and toward his neighbors, ensuring he doesn’t offend anyone or contribute to any harm. He must also be extremely patient, not letting himself get upset or tortured by any losses or setbacks, such as losing a catch right when it’s almost in reach, or breaking his tools due to ignorance or carelessness. Instead, he should accept mistakes gracefully, viewing setbacks as lessons for better diligence."

We commend all this to the trout fishers among the musquitos, and black flies of Hamilton County—for even into that dim, and barbarian region, our monthly budget finds its way.

We commend all of this to the trout fishers among the mosquitoes and black flies of Hamilton County—because even in that distant and wild area, our monthly budget makes its way there.


Among other things of the hour, we must spare a note for those pleasant statistics of author-and-bookdom, which the international discussion of Copyright has called into print.

Among other things relevant today, we should take a moment to acknowledge those interesting statistics about authors and books that the global conversation about Copyright has brought to light.

Heretofore, the man of books has been reckoned as a liver, for the most part, upon such manna as rained down from time to time, from a very imaginative heaven; he has lived, by a certain charitable courtesy of the world, (which is coy of ferreting out its injustices) beyond the tongue of talk, and his pride and poverty have suffered an amiable reprieve.

Until now, the bookish man has mostly relied on the occasional bits of inspiration that fell from a very creative sky; he has lived, thanks to a certain kind-heartedness from the world (which is hesitant to uncover its own injustices), beyond the usual conversations, and his pride and poverty have enjoyed a kind of friendly break.

The time, it seems, is now gone by; and we find Prescott and Irving submitted to the same fiscal measurement, as are the brokers upon 'Change. We wish the whole author fraternity might come as bravely out of it as the two we have named: and should it ever come to pass, that the fraternity were altogether rich, we hope they will not neglect the foundation of some quiet hospital for the poor fellows (like ourselves) who record their progress, and chronicle their honors.

The time, it seems, has now passed; and we find Prescott and Irving measured by the same financial standards as the brokers on the exchange. We hope the entire author community could emerge as successfully as the two we've mentioned: and if it ever happens that the community becomes completely wealthy, we hope they will not forget to establish a calm hospital for the struggling writers (like us) who document their journey and celebrate their achievements.

In old times a fancy held men's minds, that the payment for poetry came only from Heaven: and that so soon as the Divine fingers which caught the minstrelsy of the angel world, touched upon gold, they palsied, and lost their power. Under the present flattering condition of the author world (of which, alas, we only read!) it may be well to revive the caution: the poor may, at the least, console themselves thereby; and as for the rich—they need no consolation.

In the past, people believed that the reward for poetry came only from Heaven; and as soon as the Divine fingers that captured the music of the angelic realm touched gold, they lost their talent. Given the current flattering state of the literary world (which, unfortunately, we only read about!), it's wise to bring back this warning: the poor might at least find comfort in it; as for the rich—they don't need any comfort.

Time and time again, we believe, spicy authors have threatened to take the publisher's business off his hands; and in lieu of half the profits, to measure them all with themselves. But, unfortunately for the credit of the calling, authors are, in the general way, blessed with very moderate financial capacity; and from Scott to Lamartine, they have in such venture, to the best of our observation, worked very hard—for very little pay.

Time and time again, we believe, ambitious writers have threatened to take the publisher's business off his hands; and in exchange for half the profits, to compare themselves to everyone else. But, unfortunately for the reputation of the profession, writers typically have very limited financial resources; and from Scott to Lamartine, they have, based on our observations, worked very hard in such endeavors—for very little pay.


Speaking of Lamartine, reminds us of a little episode of French life, which has latterly crept into the French papers, and which would have made (as the publishers say) a "companion volume" to Lamartine's Raphael—always provided it were as well written out. The episode is dismissed in two or three lines of the journals, and is headed in very attracting way—"Died of Love."

Speaking of Lamartine, it brings to mind a little story from French life that has recently appeared in the French papers, and which would have made (as the publishers put it) a "companion volume" to Lamartine's Raphael—assuming it was just as well written. The story is quickly mentioned in two or three lines in the journals, and is titled in a very appealing way—"Died of Love."

Such a kind of death being mostly unheard of—especially in New York—it will be necessary to justify the title by a somewhat fuller résumé of the story, than the journalist favors us with.

Such an unusual death—especially in New York—needs some explanation for the title, so let's provide a more detailed résumé of the story than what the journalist has given us.

Marie of Montauban was as pretty a girl as the traveler might see in going through all of southern France; and a pretty girl of southern France, is more than pretty in any other quarter of France.

Marie of Montauban was as beautiful a girl as any traveler could see while exploring southern France; and a beautiful girl from southern France is more stunning than anywhere else in France.

Her father had been a small propriétaire, and had married a descendant of an old family, under circumstances of that vague and wild romance which grew up a little after the old Revolution. Both the parents, however, died early in life: she inherited from the mother exceeding delicacy, and a refinement, which agreed very poorly with the poverty to which her father's improvidence had left her an heir.

Her father had been a small landowner and had married a descendant of an old family, under circumstances of that vague and wild romance that emerged shortly after the old Revolution. However, both parents died young: she inherited her mother's delicate beauty and refinement, which didn't mesh well with the poverty her father's irresponsibility left her with.

Admired and beloved, and sometimes courted by those about her, she resolutely determined to secure her own support. She commenced in a romantic way—by quitting secretly her home, and throwing herself upon a very broad and a very wicked world. Fortune guided her to the home of a worthy baker; she here learned the smaller mysteries of his craft, and made such show in the front shop of her new-found patron, as bewitched the provincial gailliards, and made its tale upon the heart of the baker's son.

Admired and loved, and sometimes pursued by those around her, she firmly decided to secure her own independence. She started in a dramatic fashion—by quietly leaving her home and plunging into a vast and often cruel world. Luck led her to the home of a decent baker; here she learned the smaller secrets of his trade and drew attention in the front shop of her newfound employer, captivating the local charmers and winning the affection of the baker's son.

In short, the son wooed in earnest; the baker protested: and whether it was the protest (which is sure to kindle higher flame) or the honest heart of the wooer himself, Marie forgot the earnest longings, which her mother's nature had planted in her, and became the runaway wife of the runaway baker's son.

In short, the son genuinely pursued her; the baker objected: and whether it was the objection (which is bound to ignite a stronger desire) or the sincere heart of the pursuer himself, Marie forgot the deep feelings her mother had instilled in her and became the runaway wife of the runaway baker's son.

All French runaways (except from Government) go to Paris: therefore it was, that in a year's time, you might have seen the humble sign of the baker's son upon a modest shop of the Boulevard Beaumarchais. Beauty is always found out in Paris, and it is generally admired. Therefore it was, that the baker's son prospered, and the Café de Paris heard mention of the beautiful baker's wife of the Beaumarchais.

All French runaways (except those from the government) head to Paris: so, within a year, you could have seen the simple sign of the baker's son on a small shop on Boulevard Beaumarchais. Beauty is always discovered in Paris, and it is usually celebrated. That's why the baker's son thrived, and the Café de Paris talked about the lovely baker's wife from Beaumarchais.

But, with the sight of the Louvre, the Tuileries, and all the elegancies of metropolitan life, the old longings of the motherly nature came back to the humiliated Marie. She stole hours for reading and for music, and quieted her riotous ambition with the ambition of knowledge.

But, seeing the Louvre, the Tuileries, and all the elegance of city life, the old longings of Marie’s nurturing spirit returned. She carved out time for reading and music, and calmed her restless ambition with the pursuit of knowledge.

Still, however, her admirers besieged her; but thanks to her birth, besieged in vain. From month to month she attended her shop; and from month to month beguiled her mission with reading of old stories, and with the music of her guitar.

Still, her admirers surrounded her; but thanks to her background, they surrounded her in vain. Month after month, she worked at her shop; and each month, she entertained herself with reading old stories and playing her guitar.

Now, it happened that in this time, a certain Jacques Arago (well known to fame) chanced upon a day to visit the baker's shop of the Boulevard Beaumarchais; and it further happened, that as the customer was a traveler and a savant, that he fell into talk with the beautiful Marie, who even then held in her fingers some work of the visitor himself.

Now, during this time, a certain Jacques Arago (well known for his fame) happened to visit the bakery on Boulevard Beaumarchais; and it also happened that since the customer was a traveler and a scholar, he struck up a conversation with the beautiful Marie, who was even then holding some of his own work in her hands.

Talk ripened into conversation, and conversation into interest. The heart of Marie—always dutiful at home—now went wandering under the guide of her mind. She admired the distinguished traveler, and from admiring, she came presently—in virtue of his kind offices and of his instructions continued day after day—to love him.

Talk turned into conversation, and conversation grew into interest. Marie's heart—always devoted at home—now roamed free under the guidance of her mind. She found herself admiring the impressive traveler, and through that admiration, she eventually—thanks to his thoughtful gestures and his ongoing advice day after day—fell in love with him.

Therefore it was that Jacques Arago, when he came to depart upon new voyages (and here we follow his own story, rather than probability), did not whisper of his leave to the beautiful Marie, who still held her place in the baker's shop upon the Boulevard Beaumarchais.

Therefore, when Jacques Arago was about to set off on new journeys (and here we stick to his own narrative rather than what’s probable), he didn’t mention his departure to the beautiful Marie, who was still working at the baker's shop on Boulevard Beaumarchais.

But she found her liking too strong to resist; and when she heard of his departure, she hurried away to Havre—only to see the sails of his out-bound ship glimmering on the horizon.

But she found her feelings too intense to ignore; and when she heard about his departure, she rushed to Havre—only to see the sails of his outgoing ship shimmering on the horizon.

She bore the matter stoutly as she could—cherishing his letters each one as so many parts of the mind that had enslaved her; and, finally, years after, met him calmly, on his return. "I have lived," she said, "to see you again."

She handled the situation as best as she could—treasuring his letters, each one a piece of the mind that had captivated her; and finally, years later, she met him calmly upon his return. "I've lived," she said, "to see you again."

But in a little while, Arago, sitting one day in his bureau, receives a letter from Marie of Beaumarchais.

But soon, Arago, sitting one day at his desk, gets a letter from Marie of Beaumarchais.

"You deceived me when you went away over the sea; I forgive you for it! Will you forgive me now another deception? I was not well when you saw me last; I am now in the Hospital Beaujon; I shall die before tomorrow. But I die faithful to my religion—God—you! Adieu!

"You tricked me when you left for abroad; I forgive you for that! Will you forgive me for another lie now? I wasn't well when you last saw me; I'm now in the Hospital Beaujon; I'll be dead before tomorrow. But I'm dying true to my faith—God—and to you! Goodbye!"

Marie."

Marie."

Jacques Arago himself writes so much of the story as has served to make the back-bone for this; and we appeal to the ninety thousand readers of our gossip if Jacques Arago needed any thing more than the finesse of Lamartine, and a touch of his poetic nature, to weave the story of poor Marie into another Raphael?

Jacques Arago himself shares much of the story that has formed the basis for this, and we ask the ninety thousand readers of our gossip if Jacques Arago needed anything more than the finesse of Lamartine and a hint of his poetic spirit to turn the tale of poor Marie into another Raphael?


AN OLD GENTLEMAN'S LETTER.
"THE STORY OF THE BRIDE OF LANDECK."

Dear Sir—I now resume the very interesting tale I wished to tell you; but from which, in my last, I was diverted in a manner requiring some apology.

Dear [Name]—I’m picking up the fascinating story I wanted to share with you; however, in my last message, I got sidetracked in a way that needs some explaining.

You know, however, that this failing of being carried away to collaterals, is frequent in old gentlemen and nurses; and you must make excuses for my age and infirmity. Now, however, you shall have the story of "The Bride of Landeck." A bride is always interesting, and therefore I trust that my bride will not be less so than others. There is something so touching in the confidence with which she bestows the care of her whole fate and happiness on another, something so strangely perilous, even in her very joy, such a misty darkness over that new world into which she plunges, that even the coarsest and most vulgar are moved by it.

You know that older gentlemen and nurses often get sidetracked, and you should excuse my age and frailty. Now, let me tell you the story of "The Bride of Landeck." A bride is always fascinating, and I hope my bride will be just as captivating as any other. There's something so touching about her trust in handing over her entire future and happiness to someone else, something so oddly risky, even in her happiness, that there's a shadowy uncertainty over the new world she's stepping into, which even the least sensitive people can feel.

I recollect an almost amusing instance of this. The very words employed by the speakers will show you that they were persons of inferior condition; and yet they were uttered with a sigh, and with every appearance of real feeling.

I remember a nearly funny example of this. The exact words used by the speakers will show you that they were people of lower status; and yet they were said with a sigh, and with all the signs of genuine emotion.

I was one day walking along through the streets of a great city, where it is the custom, in almost all instances, for marriages to take place in church. My way lay by the vestry of a fashionable church, and I was prevented for a minute or two from passing by a great throng of carriages, and a little crowd gathered to see a bride and bridegroom set out upon their wedding tour. There were two mechanics immediately before me—carpenters apparently—and, being in haste, I tried to force my way on. One of the men looked round, saying quietly, "There's no use pushing, you can't get by;" and in a moment after, the bridal party came forth. The bridegroom was a tall, fine-looking, grave young man; and the bride a very beautiful, interesting creature, hardly twenty. They both seemed somewhat annoyed by the crowd, and hurried into their carriage and drove away.

I was walking through the streets of a big city one day, where it's common for weddings to happen in churches. My path took me by the vestry of a popular church, and I was held up for a minute or two by a large group of carriages, as a small crowd had gathered to see a bride and groom set off on their honeymoon. There were two mechanics right in front of me—carpenters, it seemed—and since I was in a hurry, I tried to push my way through. One of the men looked back and said calmly, "No use in pushing, you can’t get by." Just then, the bridal party came out. The groom was a tall, handsome, serious young man, and the bride was a stunning, captivating girl, barely twenty. They both looked a bit annoyed by the crowd and quickly got into their carriage and drove away.

When the people dispersed, the two carpenters walked on before me, commenting upon the occurrence. "Well," said the one, "she's as pretty a creature as ever I saw; and he's a handsome man; but he looks a little sternish, to my mind. I hope he'll treat her well."

When the crowd broke up, the two carpenters walked ahead of me, discussing what had happened. "Well," said one of them, "she's the prettiest girl I've ever seen; and he's a good-looking guy; but he seems a bit serious, in my opinion. I hope he treats her right."

"Ah, poor thing," said the other, "she has tied a knot with her tongue, that she can not untie with her teeth."

"Ah, poor thing," said the other, "she has tied a knot with her tongue that she can't untie with her teeth."

It is not, however, only sentiment which is occasionally elicited at weddings. I have known some of the most ludicrous scenes in the world occur on these solemn occasions. One, especially, will never pass from my mind, and I must try to give you an account of it, although the task will be somewhat difficult.

It’s not just feelings that come up at weddings. I've seen some of the funniest scenes happen during these serious events. One in particular stands out in my memory, and I’ll do my best to describe it, although it might be a bit challenging.

Some fifty years ago, in the good city of Edinburgh, many of the conveniences, and even necessaries of household comfort were arranged in a very primitive manner. It was about this time, or a little before it, that a gentleman, whom I afterward knew well, Mr. J—— F——, wooed and won a very beautiful girl of the best society in the city. His doing so was, indeed, a marvel to all; for, though young, witty, and well-looking, he was perhaps the most absent man upon the face of the earth; and the wonder was that he could ever recollect himself sufficiently to make love to one woman for two days consecutively. However, so it was; and a vast number of mistakes and blunders having been got over, the wedding day was appointed and came. The ceremony was to be performed in the house of the bride's father; and a large and fashionable company was assembled at the hour appointed. The bridegroom was known to have been in the house some time; but he did not appear; and minister, parents, bride, bridesmaids, and bridesmen, all full dressed, the ladies in court lappets, and the gentlemen with chapeaux bras under their arms, began to look very grave.

About fifty years ago, in the lovely city of Edinburgh, many of the comforts and even necessities of home life were organized in a pretty basic way. It was around this time, or maybe just before, that a man I later got to know well, Mr. J—— F——, pursued and won the heart of a stunning girl from the city's top social circle. This was quite a surprise to everyone because, even though he was young, charming, and good-looking, he was possibly the most forgetful person you could ever meet; people wondered how he managed to focus enough to court the same woman for two days in a row. But that’s how it went; after overcoming a lot of mix-ups and awkward moments, the wedding day was set and finally arrived. The ceremony was to take place at the bride's father’s house, and a large, fashionable crowd gathered at the scheduled time. The bridegroom had been inside for a while, but he didn’t show up, and the minister, parents, bride, bridesmaids, and groomsmen—all dressed to the nines, with the ladies in elaborate headpieces and the gentlemen holding their hats under their arms—started to look quite serious.

The bride's brother, however, knew his friend's infirmity, and was also aware that he had an exceedingly bad habit of reading classical authors in places the least fitted for such purposes. He stole out of the room, then, hurried to the place where he expected his future brother-in-law might be found; and a minute after, in spite of doors and staircases, his voice was heard exclaiming, "Jimmy—Jimmy; you forget you are going to be married, man. Every one is waiting for you."

The bride's brother knew about his friend's weakness and was also aware that he had a really bad habit of reading classic authors in the least appropriate places. So, he quietly slipped out of the room and rushed to where he thought his future brother-in-law might be. A minute later, despite the doors and staircases, his voice could be heard calling out, "Jimmy—Jimmy; don’t forget you’re getting married, man. Everyone is waiting for you."

"I will come directly—I will come directly," cried another voice—"I quite forgot—go and keep them amused."

"I'll come right over—I’ll be there soon," shouted another voice—"I totally forgot—go and keep them entertained."

The young gentleman returned, with a smile upon his face; but announced that the bridegroom would be there in an instant; and the whole party arranged themselves in a formidable semi-circle. This was just complete, when the door opened, and the bridegroom appeared. All eyes fixed upon him—all eyes turned toward his left arm, where his chapeau bras should have been; and a universal titter burst from all lips. Poor F—— stood confounded, perceived the direction of their looks, and turned his own eyes to his left arm also. Close pressed beneath it, appeared, instead of a neat black chapeau bras, a thin, flat, round piece of oak, with a small brass knob rising from the centre of one side. In horror, consciousness, and confusion, he suddenly lifted his arm. Down dropped the obnoxious implement, lighted on its edge, rolled forward into the midst of the circle, whirled round and round, as if paying its compliments to every body, and settled itself with a flounder at the bride's feet. A roar, which might have shook St. Andrews, burst from the whole party.

The young man returned with a smile on his face, announcing that the groom would be there any minute. The whole party formed a serious semi-circle. Just as they finished, the door opened, and the groom walked in. Everyone’s eyes were locked on him, specifically his left arm, where his chapeau bras should have been; this set off a collective giggle from everyone. Poor F—— was left speechless, noticed where they were looking, and turned to his own left arm as well. Instead of a neat black chapeau bras, he found a thin, flat, round piece of oak with a small brass knob sticking up from one side. In shock, realization, and embarrassment, he abruptly lifted his arm. The offending item fell to the ground, landed on its edge, rolled right into the middle of the circle, spun around as if greeting everyone, and finally flopped down at the bride's feet. A roar that could have shaken St. Andrews erupted from the entire group.

The bride married him notwithstanding, and practiced through life the same forbearance—the first of matrimonial virtues—which she showed on the present occasion.

The bride married him anyway and continued to show the same patience—the first of marital virtues—that she demonstrated on this occasion.

Poor F——, notwithstanding the sobering effects of matrimony, continued always the most absent man in the world; and one instance occurred, some[Pg 237] fifteen or sixteen years after his marriage, which his wife used to tell with great glee. She was a very notable woman, and good housekeeper. Originally a Presbyterian, she had conformed to the views of her husband, and regularly frequented the Episcopal church. One Sunday, just before the carriage came to the door to take her and her husband to the morning service, she went down to the kitchen, as was her custom, in mercantile parlance, to take stock, and give her orders. She happened to be somewhat longer than usual: the carriage was announced, and poor F——, probably knowing that if he gave himself a moment to pause, he should forget himself, and his wife, and the church, and all other holy and venerable things, went down after her, with the usual, "My dear, the carriage is waiting; we shall be very late."

Poor F——, even with the grounding that marriage usually brings, remained the most absent-minded guy ever. One funny story happened about fifteen or sixteen years after his wedding, which his wife loved to share. She was a remarkable woman and ran a tight household. Initially a Presbyterian, she adapted to her husband's beliefs and regularly attended the Episcopal church. One Sunday, just before the carriage arrived to take them to the morning service, she went down to the kitchen, as she often did, to check on things and give her orders. She ended up taking longer than usual; when the carriage was announced, poor F——, probably realizing that if he paused for even a second, he'd totally zone out and forget about her, the church, and everything else important, went down after her, saying, "My dear, the carriage is waiting; we’ll be very late."

Mrs. F—— went through her orders with customary precision, took up her prayer-book, entered the carriage with her husband, and rolled away toward the church.

Mrs. F—— reviewed her orders with her usual attention to detail, picked up her prayer book, stepped into the carriage with her husband, and set off toward the church.

"My dear, what an extraordinary smell of bacon there is in the carriage," said Mr. F——.

"My dear, what an amazing smell of bacon there is in the carriage," said Mr. F——.

"I do not smell it, my dear," said Mrs. F——.

"I can't smell it, my dear," said Mrs. F——.

"I do," said Mr. F——, expanding his nostrils emphatically.

"I do," said Mr. F——, dramatically flaring his nostrils.

"I think I smell it too, now," said Mrs. F——, taking a sniff.

"I think I smell it too, now," said Mrs. F——, taking a sniff.

"Well, I hope those untidy servants of ours do not smoke bacon in the carriage," said Mr. F——.

"Well, I hope our messy servants aren't smoking bacon in the carriage," said Mr. F——.

"Oh, dear, no," replied his wife, with a hearty laugh. "No fear of that, my dear."

"Oh, come on, no," his wife replied, laughing heartily. "No way that's happening, sweetie."

Shortly after, the carriage stopped at the church door; and Mr. and Mrs. F—— mounted the stairs to their pew, which was in the gallery, and conspicuous to the whole congregation. The lady seated herself, and laid her prayer-book on the velvet cushion before her. Mr. F—— put his hand into his pocket, in search of his own prayer-book, and pulled out a long parallelogram, which was not a prayer-book, but which he laid on the cushion likewise.

Shortly after, the carriage pulled up at the church door, and Mr. and Mrs. F—— climbed the stairs to their pew, which was in the gallery and visible to the entire congregation. The lady took her seat and placed her prayer book on the velvet cushion in front of her. Mr. F—— reached into his pocket looking for his prayer book but pulled out a long rectangular object that wasn't a prayer book; he set it on the cushion as well.

"I don't wonder there was a smell of bacon in the carriage, my dear," whispered Mrs. F——; and, to his horror, he perceived lying before him, in the eyes of a thousand persons, a very fine piece of red-and-white streaky bacon, which he had taken up in the kitchen, thinking it was his prayer-book.

"I’m not surprised there was a smell of bacon in the carriage, my dear," whispered Mrs. F——; and, to his horror, he realized lying in front of him, in the eyes of a thousand people, was a nice piece of red-and-white streaky bacon, which he had picked up in the kitchen, thinking it was his prayer book.

On only one subject could Mr. F—— concentrate his thoughts, and that was the law, in the profession of which he obtained considerable success, although occasionally, an awful blunder was committed; but, strange to say, never in the strictly legal part of his doings. He would forget his own name, and write that of some friend of whom he was thinking instead. He would confound plaintiff with defendant, and witnesses with counsel; but he never made a mistake in an abstract legal argument. There, where no collateral, and, as he imagined, immaterial circumstances were concerned—such as, who was the man to be hanged, and who was not—the reasoning was clear, acute, and connected; and for all little infirmities of mind, judges and jurors, who generally knew him well, made due allowance.

Mr. F—— could only focus on one thing, and that was the law. He was quite successful in his legal career, though he occasionally made terrible mistakes. Oddly enough, these errors never happened in the purely legal aspects of his work. He would forget his own name and write down the name of a friend he was thinking about instead. He would mix up plaintiffs with defendants and confuse witnesses with lawyers, but he never screwed up when it came to legal arguments. In those instances, where there were no extra, what he thought were irrelevant details—like who was going to be hanged and who wasn't—his reasoning was clear, sharp, and coherent. Judges and jurors, who usually knew him well, understood his little mental lapses.

Other people had to make allowance also; and especially when, between terms, he would go out to pay a morning visit to a friend, Mrs. F—— never counted, with any certainty, upon his return for a month. He would go into the house where his call was to be made, talk for a few minutes, take up a book, and read till dinner time—dine—and lucky if he did not fancy himself in his own house, and take the head of the table. Toward night he might find[Pg 238] out his delusion, and the next morning proceed upon his way, borrowing a clean shirt, and leaving his dirty one behind him. Thus it happened, that at the end of a twelvemonth, his wardrobe comprised a vast collection of shirts, of various sorts and patterns, with his own name on very few of them.

Other people had to be understanding too; and especially when, during breaks, he would go out to visit a friend, Mrs. F—— never really expected him to come back for at least a month. He would go into the house where he was visiting, chat for a few minutes, pick up a book, and read until dinner—then dine—and it was lucky if he didn’t imagine he was at his own house and sit at the head of the table. By evening, he might realize his mistake, and the next morning he would leave, borrowing a clean shirt and leaving his dirty one behind. Because of this, after a year, his wardrobe ended up being a huge collection of shirts, in all sorts of styles and patterns, with very few actually having his name on them.

The stories of poor Jimmy F——'s eccentricities in Edinburgh were innumerable. On one occasion, seeing a lady, on his return home, coming away from his own door, he handed her politely into her carriage, expressing his regret that she had not found Mrs F—— at home.

The stories of poor Jimmy F——'s quirks in Edinburgh were countless. One time, as he was returning home and saw a lady leaving his own door, he politely helped her into her carriage and expressed his regret that she hadn’t found Mrs. F—— at home.

"I am not surprised, my dear," said the lady, who was in reality his own wife, "that you forget me, when you so often forget yourself."

"I’m not surprised, my dear," said the woman, who was actually his own wife, "that you forget me when you so often forget about yourself."

"God bless me," cried Jimmy, with the most innocent air in the world. "I was quite sure I had seen you somewhere before; but could not tell where it was."

"God bless me," said Jimmy, with an absolutely innocent expression. "I was totally convinced I'd seen you somewhere before, but I just couldn't remember where."

Dear old Edinburgh, what a city thou wert when I first visited thee, now more than forty years ago! How full of strange nooks and corners, and, above all, how full of that racy and original character which the world in general is so rapidly losing! Warm hearted hospitality was one of the great characteristics of Auld Reekie in those times, and it must be admitted that social intercourse was sometimes a little too jovial. This did not indeed prevent occasional instances of miserly closeness, and well laughed at were they when they were discovered. There was a lady of good station and ample means in the city, somewhat celebrated for the not unusual combination of a niggard spirit, and a tendency to ostentatious display. Large supper parties were then in vogue; and I was invited to more than one of these entertainments at the house of Lady C—— G——, where I remarked that, though the table was well covered, the guests were not very strenuously pressed to their food. She had two old servants, a butler and a foot-man, trained to all her ways, and apparently participating in her economical feelings. These men, with the familiarity then customary in Scotch servants, did not scruple to give their mistress any little hints at the supper table in furtherance of her saving propensities, and as the old lady was somewhat deaf, these asides were pretty much public property. On one occasion, the butler was seen to bend over his mistress's chair, saying, in a loud whisper, and good broad Scotch, "Press the jeelies, my leddy—press the jeelies. They'll no keep."

Dear old Edinburgh, what a city you were when I first visited you over forty years ago! How full of strange nooks and corners, and, above all, how full of that rich and unique character that the world is quickly losing! Warm-hearted hospitality was one of the great traits of Auld Reekie back then, and it must be said that social gatherings sometimes got a bit too lively. This didn’t stop the occasional cases of penny-pinching, and people had a good laugh when they were found out. There was a lady of good standing and plenty of money in the city, somewhat famous for the typical mix of being stingy and showing off. Large dinner parties were popular at that time; I was invited to more than one of these events at the house of Lady C—— G——, where I noticed that while the table was well set, the guests weren’t really encouraged to dig in. She had two old servants, a butler and a footman, who were trained in all her ways and seemed to share her frugal mindset. These guys, with the informality typical of Scottish servants, didn’t hesitate to give their mistress little tips at the dinner table to support her saving habits, and since the old lady was somewhat hard of hearing, these comments were basically for everyone to hear. One time, the butler was seen leaning over her chair, saying in a loud whisper, and with a thick Scottish accent, "Press the jellies, my lady—press the jellies. They won’t last."

Lady C—— G—— did not exactly catch his words, and looked up inquiringly in his face, and the man repeated, "Press the jeelies, my leddy: they're getting mouldy."

Lady C—— G—— didn’t quite hear what he said, so she looked up at him with a questioning expression, and the man repeated, "Press the jeelies, my lady: they’re getting moldy."

"Shave them, John—shave them," said Lady C—— G——, in a solemn tone.

"Shave them, John—shave them," said Lady C—— G——, seriously.

"They've been shaved already, my leedy," roared John; and the company of course exploded.

"They've already been shaved, my lady," shouted John; and the group naturally erupted in laughter.

But to return to my tale. The small village of Landeck, is situated in the heart of the Tyrol, and in that peculiar district, called the Vorarlberg. It is as lovely a spot as the eye of man can rest upon, and the whole drive, in fact, from Innspruck is full of picturesque beauty. But—

But to get back to my story. The small village of Landeck is located in the heart of Tyrol, in that unique area known as Vorarlberg. It's as beautiful a place as anyone could ever see, and the entire drive from Innsbruck is filled with stunning scenery. But—

But I find this is the last page of the sheet, when I fondly fancied that I had another whole page, which I think would be sufficient to conclude the tale. I had probably better, therefore, reserve the story of The Bride of Landeck for another letter, and only beg you to believe me

But I realize this is the last page, even though I hoped I had another full page left to finish the story. I should probably save the tale of The Bride of Landeck for another letter and just ask you to trust me.

Yours faithfully,

Best regards,

P.

P.


Editor's Desk.

It is not a very long time ago, that "bustles" formed a very essential part of a fashionable lady's dress; nor has this singular branch of the fine arts altogether fallen into decadence at the present day. And, as apropos of this, we find in the "Drawer" a description of the uses of this article in Africa, which we think will awaken a smile upon the fair lips of our lady-readers. "The most remarkable article of dress," says the African traveler, from whom our extract is quoted, "that I have seen, is one which I have vaguely understood to constitute a part of the equipment of my fair countrywomen; in a word, the veritable 'Bustle!' Among the belles here, there is a reason for the excrescence which does not exist elsewhere; for the little children ride astride the maternal bustle, which thus becomes as useful as it is an ornamental protuberance. Fashion, however, has evidently more to do with the matter than convenience; for old wrinkled grandmothers wear these beautiful anomalies, and little girls of eight years old display protuberances that might excite the envy of a Broadway belle. Indeed, Fashion may be said to have its perfect triumph and utmost refinement in this article; it being a positive fact that some of the girls hereabout wear merely the bustle, without so much as the shadow of a garment! Its native name is "Tarb-Koshe.""

It’s not too long ago that "bustles" were a key part of a fashionable lady's outfit; this unique aspect of fashion hasn’t completely faded away today. Coincidentally, we find in the "Drawer" a description of how this item is used in Africa, which we think will make our lady readers smile. "The most striking article of clothing," says the African traveler we’re quoting, "that I’ve seen is one that I understand to be part of the attire of my enchanting countrywomen; in short, the genuine 'Bustle!' Among the beautiful women here, there’s a reason for this extra piece that doesn’t exist elsewhere; little children ride on their mothers' bustles, making them just as practical as they are decorative. However, it seems that fashion plays a bigger role than practicality; even old grandmothers wear these lovely oddities, and little girls just eight years old flaunt bumps that could make a Broadway beauty jealous. Indeed, fashion finds its ultimate achievement and refinement in this item; it’s a fact that some girls here wear only the bustle without any clothing at all! Its local name is "Tarb-Koshe."


Here is a formula for all who can couple "love" and "dove," by which they may rush into print as "poets" of the common "water." The skeleton may be called any thing—"Nature," "Poesy," "Woman," or what not:

Here is a formula for anyone who can link "love" and "dove," allowing them to quickly publish themselves as "poets" of the common "water." The skeleton can be referred to as anything—"Nature," "Poetry," "Woman," or something else:

Stream...mountain...wandering,
Breeze...gentle...playing;
Bowers...beauty...bloom,
Rose… jessamine… fragrance.
Twilight...moon...soft glow,
Tinted glories of parting day.
Poet...stars...truth...joy,
Joy...sunshine...silence...night; Voice...frown...affection...love,
Lion...anger...tamed dove.
Lovely... innocent... charming,
Fear...frown...overcome...smile; Loved one... horror... rush... delay,
Past...thorns...meet...pride.
Sweetness...life...tired...writing,
Love...hate...thorns...rose; Absence...presence...glory...bright,
Life... halo... beauty... light.

Not long since a young English merchant took his youthful wife with him to Hong-Kong, China, where the couple were visited by a wealthy Mandarin. The latter regarded the lady very attentively, and seemed to dwell with delight upon her movements. When she at length left the apartment, he said to the husband, in broken English (worse than broken China):

Not long ago, a young English merchant brought his young wife with him to Hong Kong, China, where they were visited by a wealthy Mandarin. The Mandarin paid close attention to the lady and seemed to take great pleasure in watching her movements. When she finally left the room, he said to the husband in broken English (worse than broken Chinese):

"What you give for that wifey-wife yours?"

"What do you give for that wifey of yours?"

"Oh," replied the husband, laughing at the singular error of his visitor, "two thousand dollars."

"Oh," replied the husband, laughing at his visitor's unusual mistake, "two thousand dollars."

This the merchant thought would appear to the Chinese rather a high figure; but he was mistaken.

This, the merchant thought, would seem like a big amount to the Chinese; but he was wrong.

"Well," said the Mandarin, taking out his book with an air of business, "s'pose you give her to me; give you five thousand dollar!"

"Well," said the Mandarin, pulling out his book like it was serious business, "how about you give her to me; I’ll give you five thousand dollars!"

It is difficult to say whether the young merchant was more amazed than amused; but the very grave and solemn air of the Chinaman convinced him that he was in sober earnest; and he was compelled, therefore, to refuse the offer with as much placidity[Pg 240] as he could assume. The Mandarin, however, continued to press his bargain:

It’s hard to tell if the young merchant was more surprised than entertained, but the serious demeanor of the Chinaman made him realize that he was dead serious; so he had to decline the offer with as much calmness[Pg 240] as he could muster. The Mandarin, however, kept pushing his deal:

"I give you seven thousand dollar," said he: "You take 'em?"

"I'll give you seven thousand dollars," he said. "Will you take them?"

The merchant, who had no previous notion of the value of the commodity which he had taken out with him, was compelled, at length, to inform his visitor that Englishmen were not in the habit of selling their wives after they once came in their possession—an assertion which the Chinaman was very slow to believe. The merchant afterward had a hearty laugh with his young and pretty wife, and told her that he had just discovered her full value, as he had that moment been offered seven thousand dollars for her; a very high figure, "as wives were going" in China at that time!

The merchant, who had no idea of the worth of the item he had brought with him, eventually had to tell his visitor that Englishmen didn't usually sell their wives after they had acquired them—something the Chinaman found hard to believe. Later, the merchant shared a good laugh with his young and attractive wife, telling her he had just realized her true value since someone had just offered seven thousand dollars for her; a very high price, "as wives were going" in China at that time!

Nothing astonishes a Chinaman so much, who may chance to visit our merchants at Hong-Kong, as the deference which is paid by our countrymen to their ladies, and the position which the latter are permitted to hold in society. The very servants express their disgust at seeing American or English ladies permitted to sit at table with their lords, and wonder why men can so far forget their dignity!

Nothing surprises a Chinese person visiting our merchants in Hong Kong as much as the respect our countrymen show to their women and the roles women are allowed to take in society. Even the servants express their dismay at seeing American or English women allowed to sit at the table with their men and wonder how men can forget their dignity like that!


We have seen the thought contained in the following Persian fable, before, in the shape of a scrap of "Proverbial Philosophy," by an eastern sage; but the sentiment is so admirably versified in the lines, that we can not resist presenting them to the reader:

We’ve encountered the idea in the following Persian fable before, presented as a piece of "Proverbial Philosophy" by an eastern wise person; however, the sentiment is so beautifully expressed in these lines that we can’t help but share them with the reader:

"A tiny drop of rain,
That came down from a passing cloud,
Was heard to complain idly: My short life is now over.
Outcasts of both earth and sky,
Useless to live—unknown to die.
"It happened to fall into the sea,
Then an open shell accepted it,
And, after years, how wealthy was he __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Who freed it from its prison? That drop of rain had turned into a gem,
To adorn a monarch's crown.

There is a certain London cockneyism that begins to obtain among some persons even here—and that is, the substitution of the word "gent," for gentleman. It is a gross vulgarism. In England, however, the terms are more distinctive, it seems. A waiting-maid at a provincial inn, on being asked how many "gents" there were in the house, replied, "Three gents and four gentlemen." "Why do you make a distinction, Betty?" said her interrogator. "Oh, why, the gents are only half gentlemen, people from the country, who come on horseback; the others have their carriages, and are real gentlemen!"

There’s a specific London cockney slang that starts to appear among some people even here—and that’s the replacement of the word "gent" for gentleman. It’s a really crass term. In England, though, the distinctions seem to be clearer. A waitress at a country inn, when asked how many "gents" were in the house, replied, "Three gents and four gentlemen." "Why do you make a distinction, Betty?" asked her questioner. "Oh, well, the gents are only half gentlemen, people from the countryside who come on horseback; the others have their carriages and are real gentlemen!"


Most readers will remember the ill-favored fraternity mentioned by Addison, known as "The Ugly Club," into which no person was admitted without a visible queerity in his aspect, or peculiar cast of countenance. The club-room was decorated with the heads of eminent ogres; in short, every thing was in keeping with the deformed objects of the association. They have a practice at the West of giving to the ugliest man in all the "diggins" round about, a jack-knife, which he carries until he meets with a man uglier than himself, when the new customer "takes the knife," with all its honors. A certain notorious "beauty" had carried the knife for a long time, with no prospect of ever being called upon to "stand and deliver" it. He had an under-lip, which hung down like a motherless colt's, bending into a sort of pouch for a permanent chew of tobacco[Pg 241] his eyes had a diabolical squint each way; his nose was like a ripe warty tomato; his complexion like that of an old saddle-flap; his person and limbs a miracle of ungainliness, and his gait a cross between the slouch of an elephant and the scrambling movement of a kangaroo. Yet this man was compelled to give up the knife. It happened in this wise: He was kicked in the face by a horse! His "mug," as the English cockney would call it, was smashed into an almost shapeless mass. But so very ugly was he before the accident, that, when his face got well, it was found to be so much improved that he was obliged to surrender up the knife to a successful competitor! He must have been a handsome man, whom a kick in the face by a horse would "improve!"

Most readers will remember the unattractive group mentioned by Addison, called "The Ugly Club," where no one was allowed in without a noticeable oddity in their appearance or a peculiar expression. The club room was decorated with the heads of famous ogres; everything matched the deformed theme of the group. Out West, they have a tradition of giving the ugliest man in all the "diggins" a jack-knife, which he carries until he encounters a man uglier than himself, at which point the new guy "takes the knife" along with all its prestige. A well-known "beauty" had kept the knife for a long time, with no sign of ever having to "stand and deliver" it. He had a lower lip that drooped like an orphaned colt's, formed into a sort of pouch for a constant chew of tobacco; his eyes squinted dangerously in every direction; his nose resembled a ripe, warty tomato; his skin looked like an old saddle flap; his body and limbs were remarkably awkward, and his walk was a mix between the slouch of an elephant and the hopping movement of a kangaroo. Yet, this man had to give up the knife. Here’s how it happened: He was kicked in the face by a horse! His "mug," as the English cockney would say, was smashed into an almost unrecognizable shape. But so incredibly ugly was he before the accident that, when his face healed, it was so much better that he had to hand over the knife to a new winner! He must have been a good-looking guy if a horse kick to the face could "improve" him!


Some years ago the Queen of England lost a favorite female dog. It was last seen, before its death, poking its nose into a dish of sweet-breads on the pantry-dresser. Foul play was suspected; the scullery-maid was examined; the royal dog-doctor was summoned; a "crowner's quest" was held upon the body; and the surgeon, after the evidence was "all in," assuming the office of coroner, proceeded to "sum up" as follows:

Some years ago, the Queen of England lost her favorite female dog. It was last seen, before it passed away, sniffing at a dish of sweetbreads on the pantry dresser. Foul play was suspected; the scullery maid was questioned; the royal veterinarian was called in; an inquest was held on the body; and the surgeon, after reviewing all the evidence, took on the role of coroner and summarized the findings as follows:

"This affair was involved, apparently, in a good deal of doubt until this inquisition was held. The deceased might have been poisoned, or might not; and here the difficulty comes in, to determine whether he was or wasn't. On a post-mortem examination, there was a good deal of vascular inflammation about the coats of the nose; and I have no doubt the affair of the sweet-bread, which was possibly very highly peppered, had something to do with these appearances. The pulse had, of course, stopped; but, as far as I could judge from appearances, I should say it had been pretty regular. The ears were perfectly healthy, and the tail appeared to have been recently wagged; showing that there could have been nothing very wrong in that quarter. The conclusion at which, after careful consideration, I have arrived, is, that the royal favorite came to his death from old age, or rather from the lapse of time; and a deodand is therefore imposed on the kitchen-clock, which was rather fast on the day of the dog's death, and very possibly might have accelerated his demise!"

"This situation was shrouded in a lot of uncertainty until this inquiry took place. The deceased might have been poisoned, or maybe not; and that’s where the challenge lies, figuring out which it was. In the autopsy, there was quite a bit of vascular inflammation around the nose; and I’m sure the sweet-bread, which was probably heavily seasoned, played a role in these findings. The pulse had obviously stopped, but from what I could tell, I would say it had been fairly regular. The ears were completely healthy, and the tail seemed to have been wagged recently, indicating there wasn’t anything seriously wrong there. After careful thought, I’ve concluded that the royal favorite died of old age, or more accurately, from the passage of time; and a deodand is therefore imposed on the kitchen clock, which was running a bit fast on the day of the dog’s death and likely could have hastened his end!"


It is no small thing to be called on suddenly to address a public meeting, of any sort, and to find all your wits gone a-wool-gathering, when you most require their services. "Such being the case," and "standing admitted," as it will be, by numerous readers, we commend the following speech of a compulsory orator at the opening of a free hospital:

It’s no small deal to be asked out of the blue to speak at a public meeting of any kind and to realize that all your thoughts are scattered when you need them the most. "With that in mind," and "as many readers will acknowledge," we present the following speech from a reluctant speaker at the opening of a free hospital:

"Gentlemen—Ahem!—I—I—I rise to say—that is, I wish to propose a toast—wish to propose a toast. Gentlemen, I think that you'll all say—ahem—I think, at least, that this toast is, as you'll say, the toast of the evening—toast of the evening. Gentlemen, I belong to a good many of these things—and I say, gentlemen, that this hospital requires no patronage—at least, you don't want any recommendation. You've only got to be ill—got to be ill. Another thing—they are all locked up—I mean they are shut up separate—that is, they've all got separate beds—separate beds. Now, gentlemen, I find by the report (turning over the leaves in a fidgety manner), I find, gentlemen, that from the year seventeen—no, eighteen—no, ah, yes, I'm right—eighteen hundred and fifty—No! it's a 3, thirty-six—eighteen hundred and thirty-six, no less than one hundred and ninety-three millions—no! ah! (to a committee-man at his side,) Eh?—what?—oh,[Pg 242] yes—thank you!—thank you, yes—one hundred and ninety-three thousand—two millions—no (looking through his eye-glass), two hundred and thirty-one—one hundred and ninety-three thousand, two hundred and thirty-one! Gentlemen, I beg to propose—

Guys—Ahem!—I—I—I stand up to say—that is, I want to propose a toast—want to propose a toast. Gentlemen, I think you’ll all agree—ahem—I believe, at least, that this toast is, as you’d say, the toast of the evening—toast of the evening. Gentlemen, I’m involved in a lot of these events—and I say, gentlemen, that this hospital doesn’t need any support—at least, you don’t need any recommendation. You just have to be unwell—just have to be unwell. Another thing—they’re all locked up—I mean they’re all separate—that is, they each have their own beds—separate beds. Now, gentlemen, I see from the report (turning over the pages nervously), I see, gentlemen, that since the year seventeen—no, eighteen—no, ah, yes, I’m correct—eighteen hundred and fifty—No! it’s a 3, thirty-six—eighteen hundred and thirty-six, there’s been no less than one hundred and ninety-three million—no! ah! (to a committee member next to him,) Huh?—what?—oh,[Pg 242] yes—thank you!—thank you, yes—one hundred and ninety-three thousand—two million—no (looking through his monocle), two hundred and thirty-one—one hundred and ninety-three thousand, two hundred and thirty-one! Gentlemen, I would like to propose—

"Cheers to this Institution!"

Intelligible as Egyptian hieroglyphics, and "clear as mud" to the "most superficial observer!"

Intelligible as Egyptian hieroglyphics, and "clear as mud" to the "most casual observer!"


That was a touch of delicate sarcasm which is recorded of Charles Lamb's brother, "James Elia." He was out at Eton one day, with his brother and some other friends; and upon seeing some of the Eton boys, students of the college, at play upon the green, he gave vent to his forebodings, with a sigh and solemn shake of the head: "Ah!" said he, "what a pity to think that these fine ingenuous lads in a few years will all be changed into frivolous members of parliament!"

That was a hint of subtle sarcasm noted about Charles Lamb's brother, "James Elia." One day, he was at Eton with his brother and some friends, and when he saw some of the Eton boys, students from the college, playing on the lawn, he expressed his worries with a sigh and a serious shake of his head: "Ah!" he said, "what a shame to think that these fine, genuine boys will all soon turn into superficial members of parliament!"


Some spendthrifts belonging to "The Blues" having been obliged to submit their "very superior long-tailed troop horses" to the arbitrament of a London auctioneer's hammer, a wag "improves the occasion" by inditing the following touching parody:

Some spendthrifts from "The Blues" have had to submit their "very superior long-tailed troop horses" to the judgment of a London auctioneer's hammer, and a clever person "makes the most of the situation" by writing the following heartfelt parody:

"On the ground he stood,
To take one final affectionate glance
As he entered the barracks, In the horse buyer's guide.
He heard the neigh, So familiar to him; But the soldier thought about the bills he had to pay,
And wiped away a tear.
"Next to the stable door,
A mare dropped to her knees;
She raised her jet-black tail, That waved in the breeze,
She appeared to whisper a prayer—
A prayer he couldn’t hear—
For the soldier felt his pockets empty,
And wiped away a tear.
"The soldier wiped his nose—
Oh! Don't think of him as weak!
To address his creditors, he understands
He's not cheeky enough. Go read the writing book through,
And among the names, I'm afraid,
You'll definitely discover the true Blue
"Who wiped away the tear?"

We believe it is Dryden who says, "It needs all we know to make things plain." We wonder what he would have thought of this highly intelligible account of blowing up a ship by a submarine battery, as Monsieur Maillefert blew up the rocks in Hellgate:

We think it's Dryden who says, "It takes everything we know to make things clear." We’re curious about what he would have made of this very straightforward explanation of blowing up a ship with a submarine battery, like how Monsieur Maillefert blew up the rocks in Hellgate:

"There is no doubt that all submarine salts, acting in coalition with a pure phosphate, and coagulating chemically with the sublimate of marine potash, will create combustion in nitrous bodies. It is a remarkable fact in physics, that sulphurous acids, held in solution by glutinous compounds, will create igneous action in aquiferous bodies; and hence it is, therefore, that the pure carbonates of any given quantity of bituminous or ligneous solids will of themselves create the explosions in question."

"There’s no doubt that all underwater salts, working together with a pure phosphate and chemically combining with the leftover marine potash, will cause combustion in nitrous materials. It’s an interesting fact in physics that sulfurous acids, kept in solution by sticky compounds, will generate fiery action in water-bearing substances; and that’s why the pure carbonates from any amount of combustible or woody materials will create the explosions in question."

We have heard men listen to such lucid, pellucid "expositions" as this, with staring eyes:

We have seen men pay attention to such clear, transparent "explanations" like this, with wide-open eyes:

"And they continued to gaze, and the wonder only grew," That small head could hold everything he knew.

He was a keen observer and a rare discriminator of children, who drew this little picture, in a work upon "Childhood and its Reminiscences:"

He was a sharp observer and uniquely perceptive when it came to children, who created this little drawing in a work titled "Childhood and its Reminiscences:"

"See those two little girls! You hardly know which is the elder, so closely do they follow each[Pg 243] other. They were born to the same routine, and will be bred in it for years, perhaps, side by side, in unequal fellowship; one pulling back, the other dragging forward. Watch them for a few moments as they play together, each dragging her doll about in a little cart. Their names are Cecilia and Constance, and they manage their dolls always as differently as they will their children. You ask Cecilia where she is going to drive her doll to, and she will tell you, 'Through the dining-room into the hall, and then back into the dining-room,' which is all literally true. You ask Constance, and with a grave, important air, and a loud whisper, for Doll is not to hear on any account, she answers, 'I am going to take her to London, and then to Brighton, to see her little cousin: the hall is Brighton, you know,' she adds, with a condescending look. Cecilia laments over a dirty frock, with a slit at the knee, and thinks that Mary, the maid, will never give her the new one she promised. Constance's doll is somewhat in the costume of the king of the Sandwich Islands; top-boots and a cocked-hat, having only a skein of worsted tied round her head, and a strip of colored calico or her shoulders; but she is perfectly satisfied that it is a wreath of flowers and a fine scarf; bids you smell of the "rose-oil" in her hair, and then whips herself, to jump over the mat.

"Look at those two little girls! You can hardly tell which one is older, they follow each other so closely. They're used to the same routine and will probably grow up side by side for years, in a bit of a push-and-pull dynamic; one holding back, the other moving ahead. Watch them for a bit as they play together, each pulling her doll in a little cart. Their names are Cecilia and Constance, and they manage their dolls just as differently as they will manage their future kids. If you ask Cecilia where she’s taking her doll, she’ll say, 'Through the dining room into the hall, and then back into the dining room,' which is completely true. Ask Constance, and with a serious, important tone and a loud whisper—because the doll can’t hear—she’ll say, 'I’m taking her to London, and then to Brighton, to see her little cousin: the hall is Brighton, you know,' she adds, with a patronizing look. Cecilia complains about a dirty dress with a tear at the knee and worries that Mary, the maid, will never give her the new one she promised. Constance’s doll is dressed like the king of the Sandwich Islands; with top boots and a cocked hat, just a piece of yarn tied around her head, and a strip of colorful fabric across her shoulders. But she’s completely convinced it’s a flower crown and a fancy scarf; she tells you to smell the "rose oil" in her hair, and then jumps over the mat."

"In other matters, the case is reversed. When fear is concerned, Cecilia's imagination becomes active, and Constance's remains perfectly passive. A bluff old gentleman passes through that same hall. The children stop their carts and stare at him, upon which he threatens to put them in his pocket. Poor Cecilia runs away, in the greatest alarm; but Constance coolly says: "You can't put us in your pocket; it isn't half big enough!"

"In other matters, the case is reversed. When it comes to fear, Cecilia's imagination kicks in, while Constance stays completely calm. A blustery old man walks through that same hall. The kids stop their carts and stare at him, and he jokingly threatens to put them in his pocket. Poor Cecilia panics and runs away; but Constance coolly replies, 'You can't put us in your pocket; it isn't nearly big enough!'"

It strikes us that there is an important lesson to parents in this last passage. Because one child has no fear to go to bed in the dark, how many poor trembling children, differently constituted, have passed the night in an agony of fear!

It hits us that there's an important lesson for parents in this last passage. Just because one child isn't scared of sleeping in the dark, how many poor trembling kids, who are different, have spent the night in intense fear!


There are few more striking things in verse, in the English Language, than "The Execution of Montrose." The author has not, to our knowledge, been named, and the lines appeared for the first time many years ago. The illustrious head of the great house of Grahame in Scotland was condemned to be hung, drawn, and quartered; his head to be affixed on an iron pin and set on the pinnacle of the Tolbooth in Edinburgh; one hand to be set on the port of Perth, the other on the port of Stirling; one leg and foot on the port of Aberdeen, the other on the port of Glasgow. In the hour of his defeat and of his death he showed the greatness of his soul, by exhibiting the most noble magnanimity and Christian heroism. The few verses which follow will enable the reader to judge of the spirit which pervades the poem:

There are few things in poetry, in the English language, that stand out like "The Execution of Montrose." The author remains unknown, and the lines first appeared many years ago. The distinguished leader of the great house of Grahame in Scotland was sentenced to be hanged, drawn, and quartered; his head was to be placed on an iron spike atop the Tolbooth in Edinburgh, one hand on the port of Perth, the other on the port of Stirling; one leg and foot on the port of Aberdeen, the other on the port of Glasgow. In the moment of his defeat and death, he displayed the greatness of his spirit through remarkable nobility and Christian heroism. The few verses that follow will help the reader understand the spirit that fills the poem:

"It was I who led the Highland army
Through snowy Lochaber, What time the checkered clans arrived To fight Montrose: I've told you how the Southerners fell
Under the wide claymore,
And how we defeated the Campbell clan
By Inverlochy's coast:
I've told you how we took Dundee,
And tamed Lindsay's pride! But I've never told you yet,
How the Great Marquis passed away!
"A traitor betrayed him to his enemies;
Oh, act of eternal shame! I urge you, kid, if you ever encounter With one of Assynt's names— Whether it's on the mountainside, Or yet in the valley,
Standing alone in battle gear, Or supported by armed men—
Confront him like you would confront the man. Who tarnished your father's name; Remember where you come from,
And take down the coward!"

The poet goes on to describe his riding to the place of execution in a cart, with hands tied behind him, and amidst the jeers and taunts of his enemies; but his noble bearing subdued the hearts of many even of his bitter foes. Arrived at the place of execution, the "Great Marquis" looks up to the scaffold, and exclaims:

The poet describes being taken to the execution site in a cart, with his hands bound behind him, while enduring the jeers and taunts from his enemies. However, his dignified demeanor won over the hearts of many, even some of his fiercest opponents. Once he arrives at the execution site, the "Great Marquis" looks up at the scaffold and exclaims:

"Now, I swear by my honor as a knight," And by the name I carry,
And by the red St. Andrew's cross
That wave above us there—
Yes, by a stronger, more powerful oath,
And oh! that it should be so!—
By that dark stream of royal blood That lies between you and me—
I haven't searched on the battlefield
A famous wreath,
Nor did I dare to hope, on my dying day,
To earn a martyr's crown!
"There is a room far away,
Where the good and brave rest,
But you have named a better place for me. Than by my dad's grave.
For truth and justice against the power of treason,
This hand has always tried,
And you raise it up as a witness still. In the sight of the earth and sky.
Then lift my head on that tower, Give every town a part,
And God who created, shall gather them;
I'm leaving you for Him!"

We know of few sublimer deaths than this, in which the poet has taken no liberties with historical facts.

We know of very few more noble deaths than this one, where the poet has stayed true to the historical facts.


A cunning old fox is Rothschild, the greatest banker in the world. He said, on one occasion, to Sir Thomas Buxton, in England, "My success has always turned upon one maxim. I said, 'I can do what another man can;' and so I am a match for all the rest of 'em. Another advantage I had: I was always an off-hand man. I made a bargain at once. When I was settled in London, the East India Company had eight hundred thousand pounds in gold to sell. I went to the sale, and bought the whole of it. I knew the Duke of Wellington must have it. I had bought a great many of his bills at a discount. The Government sent for me, and said they must have it. When they had got it, they didn't know how to get it to Portugal, where they wanted it. I undertook all that, and I sent it through France; and that was the best business I ever did in my life.

A clever old fox is Rothschild, the greatest banker in the world. He once told Sir Thomas Buxton in England, "My success has always relied on one principle. I said, 'I can do what another man can;' and that means I can compete with all the rest of them. Another advantage I had: I was always direct. I made deals immediately. When I was settled in London, the East India Company had eight hundred thousand pounds in gold to sell. I went to the sale and bought all of it. I knew the Duke of Wellington had to have it. I had purchased a lot of his bills at a discount. The Government called me and said they needed it. Once they had it, they didn't know how to transport it to Portugal, where they wanted it. I took care of everything and sent it through France; and that was the best deal I ever made in my life."

"It requires a great deal of boldness and a great deal of caution to make a great fortune, and when you have got it, it requires ten times as much wit to keep it. If I were to listen to one half the projects proposed to me, I should ruin myself very soon.

"It takes a lot of courage and a lot of careful thinking to build a great fortune, and once you have it, it takes ten times the cleverness to maintain it. If I were to consider even half of the ideas suggested to me, I would quickly end up losing everything."

"One of my neighbors is a very ill-tempered man. He tries to vex me, and has built a great place for swine close to my walk. So when I go out, I hear first, 'Grunt, grunt,' then 'Squeak, squeak.' But this does me no harm. I am always in good-humor. Sometimes, to amuse myself, I give a beggar a guinea. He thinks it is a mistake, and for fear I should find it out, he runs away as hard as he can. I advise you to give a beggar a guinea sometimes—it is very amusing."

"One of my neighbors is a really grumpy guy. He tries to annoy me and has built a big pigpen right by my path. So when I go outside, I first hear 'Grunt, grunt,' then 'Squeak, squeak.' But it doesn’t bother me. I’m always in a good mood. Sometimes, just to entertain myself, I give a beggar a guinea. He thinks it’s a mistake, and afraid that I’ll realize it, he runs away as fast as he can. I recommend you give a beggar a guinea sometimes—it’s pretty funny."


Travelers by railroad, who stop at the "eating[Pg 245] stations," and are hurried away by the supernatural shriek of the locomotive before they have begun their repast, will appreciate and laugh at the following:

Travelers by train, who stop at the "eating[Pg 245] stations," and are rushed off by the loud whistle of the locomotive before they even start their meal, will enjoy and find humor in the following:

"We have sometimes seen in a pastry-cook's window, the announcement of 'Soups hot till eleven at night,' and we have thought how very hot the said soups must be at ten o'clock in the morning; but we defy any soup to be so red-hot, so scorchingly and so intensely scarifying to the roof of the mouth, as the soup you are allowed just three minutes to swallow at the railway stations. In the course of our perigrinations, a day or two ago, we had occasion to stop at a distant station. A smiling gentleman, with an enormous ladle, said insinuatingly:

"We have sometimes seen in a pastry shop's window the sign 'Soups hot until eleven at night,' and we've wondered just how hot those soups must be at ten in the morning. But we challenge anyone to find soup that's as boiling hot, as scorchingly intense, and as painfully burning to the roof of the mouth as the soup you have just three minutes to gulp down at train stations. A day or two ago, while traveling, we had to stop at a remote station. A cheerful man with a huge ladle said suggestively:"

"'Soup, sir?'

'Soup, sir?'

"'Thank you—yes.'

"Thanks—yes."

"Then the gigantic ladle was plunged into a caldron, which hissed with hot fury at the intrusion of the ladle.

"Then the huge ladle was dipped into a cauldron, which hissed with hot anger at the ladle's intrusion."

"We were put in possession of a plateful of a colored liquid, that actually took the skin off our face by mere steam. Having paid for the soup, we were just about to put a spoonful to our lips when a bell was rung, and the gentleman who had suggested the soup, ladled out the soup, and got the money for the soup, blandly remarked:

"We were served a plateful of a colorful liquid that literally peeled the skin off our faces with just the steam. After paying for the soup, we were just about to bring a spoonful to our lips when a bell rang, and the guy who had suggested the soup, dished it out, and collected the money for it, casually said:"

"'Sir, the train is just off!'

"'Sir, the train just departed!'"

"We made a desperate thrust of a spoonful into our mouth, but the skin peeled off our lips, tongue, and palate, like the 'jacket' from a hot potato."

"We desperately shoved a spoonful into our mouths, but the skin came off our lips, tongue, and palate, like the 'jacket' from a hot potato."

Probably the same soup was served out to the passengers by the next train. Meanwhile the "soup-vendor smiled pleasantly, and evidently enjoyed the fun!"

Probably the same soup was served to the passengers by the next train. Meanwhile, the "soup vendor smiled happily and clearly enjoyed the fun!"


One of the best of the minor things of Thackeray's—thrown off, doubtless before his temporarily-suspended cigar had gone out—is the following. It is a satire upon the circumstance of some fifty deer being penned into the narrow wood of some English nobleman, for Prince Albert to "hunt" in those confined limits. The lines are by "Jeems, cousin-german on the Scotch side," to "Chawls Yellowplush, Igsquire":

One of the best minor works by Thackeray—written, no doubt, before his temporarily-stopped cigar went out—is the following. It’s a satire about the situation where about fifty deer are trapped in a small wood belonging to some English nobleman for Prince Albert to “hunt” within those limited boundaries. The lines are by “Jeems, cousin-german on the Scotch side,” addressed to “Chawls Yellowplush, Igsquire”:

"SONNICK.

"sejested by prince halbert gratiously killing the stags at jacks cobug gothy.

"suggested by Prince Halbert graciously hunting the stags at Jack's Cobug Gothy."

"About forty heads of sleek and antlered deer,
In Cobug (where these hanimels are plentiful)
I heard it in the news that someone was shot,
By Halbert, Husband of the British crown.
Britannia's Queen shed a lovely tear,
Watching them slaughtered in their forest prisons; Especially when the keepers are standing around,
Came up and cut their pretty innocent whizzes.
Suppose, instead of this poor Germing sport,
This Saxon deer that he hunts and catches, Our prince should take a stroll in Capel Court,
And create a massacre of English stags.
Poor stags of England! If only the Huntsman were after you,
What chaos he would cause, and what a tremendous fight. James."

What is pleasure? It is an extremely difficult thing to say what "pleasure" means. Pleasure bears a different scale to every person. Pleasure to a country girl may mean a village ball, and "so many partners that she danced till she could scarcely stand." Pleasure to a school-boy means tying a string to his school-fellow's toe when he is asleep, and pulling it till he wakens him. Pleasure to a "man of inquiring mind" means, "a toad inside of a stone," or a beetle running around with his head off. Pleasure to a hard-laboring man means doing nothing;[Pg 246] pleasure to a fashionable lady means, "having something to do to drive away the time." Pleasure to an antiquary means, an "illegible inscription." Pleasure to a connoisseur means, a "dark, invisible, very fine picture." Pleasure to the social, the "human face divine." Pleasure to the morose, "Thank Heaven, I shan't see a soul for the next six months!"

What is pleasure? It’s really tough to define what “pleasure” means. Pleasure means something different to everyone. For a country girl, pleasure might mean a village dance, with so many partners that she dances until she can barely stand. For a schoolboy, it could mean tying a string to his sleeping friend's toe and pulling it until he wakes up. For a curious person, pleasure might be finding “a toad inside a stone” or watching a beetle scurrying around without its head. For a hard-working man, pleasure means doing nothing; for a trendy lady, it means “having something to do to pass the time.” For an antiquarian, pleasure is “an illegible inscription.” For a connoisseur, it’s a “dark, hidden, very fine painting.” For someone sociable, it’s “the divine human face.” For someone gloomy, it’s “Thank goodness, I won’t have to see anyone for the next six months!”[Pg 246]


"Why don't you wash and dress yourself when you come into a court of justice?" asked a pompous London judge of a chimney-sweep, who was being examined as a witness. "Dress myself, my lord," said the sweep: "I am dressed as much as your lordship: you are in your working-clothes, and so am I!"

"Why don't you wash and get dressed when you come into a court of justice?" asked a pretentious London judge of a chimney sweep who was being questioned as a witness. "Get dressed, my lord," said the sweep, "I am dressed just like your lordship: you are in your work-clothes, and so am I!"


A good while ago that inimitable wag, Punch had some very amusing "Legal Maxims," with comments upon them; a few of which found their way into the "Drawer," and a portion of which we subjoin:

A while back, that unique jokester, Hit, had some really funny "Legal Maxims" along with comments on them. A few of these made their way into the "Drawer," and we’re sharing some of them here:

"A personal action dies with the person."—This maxim is clear enough; and means that an action brought against a man, when he dies in the middle of it, can not be continued. Thus, though the law sometimes, and very often, pursues a man to the grave, his rest there is not likely to be disturbed by the lawyers. If a soldier dies in action, the action does not necessarily cease, but is often continued with considerable vigor afterward.

"A personal action dies with the person."—This saying is pretty straightforward; it means that if someone is sued and they die during the legal process, the case cannot carry on. So, even though the law often hunts someone down until their last breath, their peace in death is generally not interrupted by legal battles. If a soldier dies in combat, however, the legal action against them doesn’t automatically end and is often pursued with great intensity afterward.

"Things of a higher nature determine things of a lower nature."—Thus a written agreement determines one in words; although if the words are of a very high nature, they put an end to all kinds of agreement between the parties.

"Higher things govern lower things."—So, a written agreement defines the terms of a verbal one; however, if the words are of a very elevated nature, they nullify all types of agreement between the parties.

"The greater contains the less."—Thus, if a man tenders more money than he ought to pay, he tenders what he owes: for the greater contains the less; but a quart wine-bottle, which is greater than a pint and a half, does not always contain a pint and a half; so that, in this instance, the less is not contained in the greater.

"The greater contains the less."—So, if a person offers more money than they should, they are still offering what they owe: because the greater includes the less; however, a quart wine bottle, which is larger than a pint and a half, does not always hold a pint and a half; in this case, the less is not included in the greater.

"Deceit and fraud shall be remedied on all occasions."—It may be very true, that deceit and fraud ought to be remedied, but whether they are, is quite another question. It is much to be feared, that in law, as well as in other matters, ought sometimes stands for nothing.

"Deceit and fraud should be corrected at all times."—It may be very true that deceit and fraud should be corrected, but whether they are, is a completely different issue. It is very concerning that in law, as in other areas, should sometimes means nothing at all.

"The law compels no one to impossibilities."—This is extremely considerate on the part of the law; but if it does not compel a man to impossibilities, it sometimes drives him to attempt them. The law, however, occasionally acts upon the principle of two negatives making an affirmative; thus treating two impossibilities as if they amounted to a possibility. As, when a man can not pay a debt, law-expenses are added, which he can not pay either; but the latter being added to the former, it is presumed, perhaps, that the two negatives, or impossibilities may constitute one affirmative or possibility, and the debtor is accordingly thrown into prison, if he fails to accomplish it.

"The law doesn't force anyone to do impossible things."—This shows great consideration from the law; however, if it doesn't force a person into the impossible, it sometimes pushes them to try. The law can occasionally operate on the principle that two negatives create a positive; treating two impossibilities as though they create a possibility. For example, when a person can't pay a debt, legal fees are added, which they also can't pay; yet, when the latter is added to the former, it is assumed, perhaps, that these two negatives, or impossibilities, might equal one positive or possibility, and the debtor is then thrown into prison if they fail to meet this expectation.


Some country readers of the "Drawer," unacquainted with the dance called the "Mazurka," may like to know how to accomplish that elaborate and fashionable species of saltation. Here follows a practical explanation of the figures:

Some readers from the countryside of the "Drawer," who aren't familiar with the dance called the "Mazurka," might want to learn how to do that intricate and trendy type of dance. Here's a practical explanation of the moves:

Get a pair of dress shoes; high heels are the best. Find a partner, then stand with six others in a circle; Jump three times to the right, take two stamps, and then rest,
[Pg 247] Hop three times to the left, give a kick and a throw; Be cautious about writing off some neighbors; you might regret it later. People with corns should probably avoid it.
Your partner you will travel around next; that Just dance all the way around her, unless she's too heavy;
Take a big step forward, then do two hops for poussette; Finally, if possible, you need to get back to your place. A general brawl always breaks out here,
Started by the loss of a few women's shoes; A soft cry and a scream—"Oh no, I'm going to fall!"
"How dumb you are!"—"We are all mistaken!" and that’s it.

Truly to appreciate such a dancing scene as this, one should see it through a closed window, at a fashionable watering-place, without being able to hear a note of the music, the "moving cause" of all the frisking.

Truly to appreciate a dance scene like this, one should observe it through a closed window at a trendy vacation spot, without being able to hear a single note of the music, the "moving cause" of all the activity.


CONTRIBUTIONS TO OUR DRAWER.

Miss Trephina and Miss Trephosa, two ancient ladies of virgin fame, formerly kept a boarding-house in the immediate neighborhood of the Crosby-street Medical College. They took in students, did their washing, and to the best of their abilities mended their shirts and their morals. Miss Trephina, in spite of the numerous landmarks which time had set up upon her person, was still of the sentimental order. She always dressed "de rigueur" in cerulean blue, and wore false ringlets, and teeth (miserabile dictu!) of exceedingly doubtful extraction. Miss Trephosa, her sister, was on the contrary an uncommonly "strong-minded" woman. Her appearance would have been positively majestic, had it not been for an unfortunate squint, which went far to upset the dignified expression of her countenance. She wore a fillet upon her brows "à la Grecque," and people did say that her temper was as cross as her eyes. Bob Turner was a whole-souled Kentuckian, for whom his professorial guardian obtained lodgings in the establishment presided over by these two fascinating damsels. Somehow or other, Bob and his hostesses did not keep upon the best of terms very long. Bob had no notion of having his minutest actions submitted to a surveillance as rigid as (in his opinion) it was impertinent. One morning a fellow-student passing by at an early hour, saw the Kentuckian, who was standing upon the steps of the dragons' castle, from which he had just emerged, take from his pocket a slip of paper, and proceed to affix the same, with the aid of wafers, to the street door. The student skulked about the premises until Bob was out of sight, and he could read without observation the inscription placarded upon the panel. It was as follows—we do not vouch for its originality, although we know nothing to the contrary:

Ms. Trephina and Ms. Trephosa, two elderly ladies known for their virtuous reputation, used to run a boarding house right next to Crosby-street Medical College. They hosted students, did their laundry, and to the best of their abilities, patched up their shirts and their moral behavior. Miss Trephina, despite the multiple signs of aging on her, still had a romantic disposition. She always dressed "de rigueur" in cerulean blue, wore fake curls, and had teeth (miserabile dictu!) of highly questionable origin. Miss Trephosa, on the other hand, was an unusually "strong-minded" woman. Her appearance could have been quite impressive if it weren’t for an unfortunate squint that really undermined the dignified look on her face. She wore a headband "à la Grecque," and people claimed her temper was as bad as her eyes. Bob Turner was a warm-hearted Kentuckian, for whom his professor arranged accommodations in the house run by these two intriguing ladies. Somehow, Bob and his landladies didn’t get along well for long. Bob wasn’t interested in having his every move watched as strictly as (in his view) it was annoyingly intrusive. One morning, a fellow student, passing by early, spotted the Kentuckian standing on the steps of the boarding house, from which he had just come, taking a slip of paper from his pocket and sticking it, with the help of some wafers, to the front door. The student lingered around until Bob was out of sight, allowing him to read the sign on the door without being seen. It read as follows—we can’t guarantee its originality, although we have no reason to believe otherwise:

"To rent or lease for the duration of her life,
A nagging old maid, like a wife; She's old and she's unattractive—bad-tempered and skinny;
For more details, ask inside!

An hour afterward the paper had disappeared from the door. Whether Bob was ever detected or not we can not tell, but he changed his lodgings the next term.

An hour later, the paper was gone from the door. We can't say for sure if Bob was ever caught, but he moved to a different place the next term.


The Spaniards have a talent for self-glorification which throws that of all other nations, even our own, into the shade. Some allowance should be made, perhaps, for conventional hyperbolism of style, but vanity has as much to do with it as rhetoric. A traveled friend saw performed at Barcelona a play called "Españoles sobre todos"—"Spaniards before all"—in which the hero, a Spanish knight, and a perfect paladin in prowess, overthrows more English and French knights with his single arm than would constitute the entire regular army of this country. All[Pg 248] these absurdities were received by the audience with a grave enthusiasm marvelous enough to witness. The play had a great run in all the cities of Spain, until it reached Madrid, where its first representation scandalized the French embassador to such a degree, that, like a true Gaul as he was, he made it a national question, interfered diplomatically, and the Government suppressed the performance.

The Spaniards have a knack for self-promotion that outshines that of all other nations, including our own. Maybe we should consider the usual exaggeration in their style, but their vanity plays just as big a role as the rhetoric. A well-traveled friend saw a play in Barcelona called "Españoles sobre todos"—"Spaniards above all"—where the main character, a Spanish knight and an incredible warrior, defeats more English and French knights with just one arm than would make up the entire regular army of this country. All[Pg 248] these ridiculous claims were met by the audience with a serious enthusiasm that was quite remarkable to see. The play was hugely popular in cities all over Spain until it got to Madrid, where its first showing offended the French ambassador so much that, true to his nature, he turned it into a national issue, intervened diplomatically, and the government shut down the performance.

There is a light-house at Cadiz—a very good light-house—but in no respect an extraordinary production of art. There is an inscription carved upon it, well peppered with notes of exclamation, and which translated reads as follows:

There’s a lighthouse in Cadiz—a pretty good lighthouse—but it’s not an extraordinary piece of art by any means. There’s an inscription carved on it, filled with exclamation points, and it translates to:

"This light-house was erected upon Spanish soil, of Spanish stone, by Spanish hands."

"This lighthouse was built on Spanish soil, using Spanish stone, by Spanish hands."


An old farmer from one of the rural districts—we may be allowed to say, from one of the very rural districts—recently came to town to see the sights, leaving his better-half at home, with the cattle and the poultry. Among various little keepsakes which he brought back to his wife, on his return to his Penates, was his own daguerreotype. "Oh! these men, these men! what creturs they are!" exclaimed the old lady, on receiving it; "just to think that he should fetch a picture of himself all the way from York, and be so selfish as not to fetch one of me at the same time!"

An old farmer from one of the rural areas—we can say, from one of the really rural areas—recently came to town to check out the sights, leaving his wife at home with the cattle and the chickens. Among the various little souvenirs he brought back for his wife when he returned home was a picture of himself. "Oh! these men, these men! what creatures they are!" the old lady exclaimed upon receiving it; "can you believe he brought a picture of himself all the way from York, and was so selfish as not to bring one of me at the same time!"


The following good story is told of George Hogarth, the author of musical history, biography, and criticism, and of "Memoirs of the Musical Drama." It seems that Mr. Hogarth is an intimate friend of Charles Dickens. Upon one occasion, Mr. Dickens had a party at his house, at which were present, among other notabilities, Miss ——, the famous singer, and her mother, a most worthy lady, but not one of the "illuminated." Mr. Hogarth's engagement as musical critic for some of the leading London Journals kept him busy until quite late in the evening; and to Mrs. ——'s reiterated inquiries as to when Mr. Hogarth might be expected, Mr. Dickens replied that he could not venture to hope that he would come in before eleven o'clock. At about that hour the old gentleman, who is represented as being one of the mildest and most modest of men, entered the rooms, and the excited Mrs. —— solicited an immediate introduction. When the consecrated words had been spoken by the amused host, fancy the effect of Mrs. ——'s bursting out with the hearty exclamation, "Oh, Mr. Hogarth, how shall I express to you the honor which I feel on making the acquaintance of the author of the 'Rake's Progress!'"

The following great story is told about George Hogarth, the author of musical history, biography, and criticism, and of "Memoirs of the Musical Drama." It seems that Mr. Hogarth is a close friend of Charles Dickens. One time, Mr. Dickens hosted a party at his house, which included, among other notable guests, Miss ——, the famous singer, and her mother, a very respectable lady, but not exactly one of the "illuminated." Mr. Hogarth's role as a musical critic for some of the top London journals kept him occupied until late in the evening; and in response to Mrs. ——'s repeated questions about when Mr. Hogarth might arrive, Mr. Dickens said he couldn't hope that he would show up before eleven o'clock. Around that time, the elderly gentleman, who is described as one of the gentlest and most humble of men, walked into the room, and an excited Mrs. —— eagerly asked for an immediate introduction. Once the formal introductions were made by the amused host, imagine the reaction when Mrs. —— exclaimed, "Oh, Mr. Hogarth, how can I express to you the honor I feel in meeting the author of the 'Rake's Progress!'"

We wish it had been our privilege to see Dickens' face at that moment.

We wish we could have seen Dickens' face at that moment.


Dr. Dionysius Lardner married an Irish lady, of the city of Dublin, we believe, whose name was Cicily. The Doctor is represented not to have treated her with all conceivable marital tenderness. Among the University wags, he went by the name of "Dionysius, the Tyrant of Cicily" (Sicily.)

Dr. Dionysius Lardner married an Irish woman, we think from Dublin, named Cicily. The Doctor is said not to have treated her with all the expected kindness of a husband. Among the university jokesters, he was known as "Dionysius, the Tyrant of Cicily" (Sicily.)


The late Pope of Rome, Gregory XVI., was once placed in an extremely awkward dilemma, in consequence of his co-existing authority as temporal and spiritual prince. A child of Jewish parentage was stolen from its home in early infancy. Every possible effort was made to discover the place of its concealment, but for many years without any success. At length, after a long lapse of time, it was accidentally ascertained that the boy, who had now almost grown a man, was residing in a Christian family, in a[Pg 249] section of the town far removed from the "Ghetto," or Jews' quarter. The delighted parents eagerly sought to take their child home at once, but his Christian guardians refused to give him up; and the Pope was applied to by both parties, to decide upon the rival claims. On the one hand it was urged, that, as the head of the State, his Holiness could never think of countenancing the kidnapping of a child, and the detaining him from his natural friends. On the other hand it was contended, that, as head of the Church, it was impossible for him to give back to infidelity one who had been brought up a true believer. The case was a most difficult one to pass upon, and what might have been the result it would be hard to tell, had not the voice of habit been stronger than the voice of blood, and the subject of the dispute expressed an earnest desire to cling to the Church rather than be handed over to the Synagogue.

The late Pope of Rome, Gregory XVI, once found himself in a very awkward situation due to his role as both a secular and spiritual leader. A child of Jewish descent had been taken from his home when he was just a baby. Every possible attempt was made to find out where he was hidden, but for many years, there was no success. Finally, after a long time, it was discovered by chance that the boy, now almost a man, was living with a Christian family in a[Pg 249] part of town far from the "Ghetto," or the Jewish quarter. The thrilled parents immediately wanted to bring their child home, but his Christian guardians refused to let him go. Both sides turned to the Pope to resolve the competing claims. One argument was that, as the head of the State, his Holiness couldn't support the kidnapping of a child and the separation from his biological family. On the flip side, it was argued that, as the head of the Church, it was impossible for him to return someone to unfaith when he had been raised as a true believer. The case was extremely challenging to decide, and it’s hard to say what the outcome might have been if the desire for familiarity hadn’t outweighed the ties of blood, as the person at the center of the dispute expressed a strong wish to remain with the Church rather than be returned to the Synagogue.


The famous humorist, Horne Tooke, once stood for Parliament in the Liberal interest. His election was contested by a person who had made a large fortune as a public contractor. This gentleman, in his speech from the hustings, exhorted the constituency not to elect a man who had no stake in the country. Mr. Tooke, in reply, said that he must confess, with all humility, that there was, at least, one stake in the country which he did not possess, and that was a stake taken from the public fence.

The well-known humorist, Horne Tooke, once ran for Parliament as a Liberal. His election was challenged by someone who had made a fortune as a public contractor. During his speech from the podium, this gentleman urged the voters not to choose a man who didn't have a stake in the country. In response, Mr. Tooke admitted, with all humility, that there was, at least, one stake in the country that he didn’t have, and that was a stake taken from the public fence.

Upon another occasion, the blank form for the income-tax return was sent in to Mr. Tooke to be filled up. He inserted the word "Nil," signed it, and returned it to the board of county magistrates. Shortly afterward he was called before this honorable body of gentlemen to make an explanation. "What do you mean by 'Nil,' sir?" asked the most ponderous of the gentlemen upon the bench. "I mean literally 'Nil,'" answered the wag.

Upon another occasion, the blank form for the income tax return was sent to Mr. Tooke to fill out. He wrote "Nil," signed it, and returned it to the county magistrates' office. Shortly after, he was called before this esteemed group of gentlemen to explain. "What do you mean by 'Nil,' sir?" asked the most serious-looking man on the bench. "I mean literally 'Nil,'" replied the jokester.

"We perfectly understand the meaning of the Latin word Nil—nothing," rejoined the magistrate, with an air of self-congratulation upon his learning. "But do you mean to say, sir, that you live without any income at all—that you live upon nothing?"

"We totally get what the Latin word Nil means—nothing," replied the magistrate, clearly pleased with his knowledge. "But are you really saying, sir, that you live without any income at all—that you live on nothing?"

"Upon nothing but my brains, gentlemen," was Tooke's answer.

"Just my brains, gentlemen," was Tooke's answer.

"Upon nothing but his brains!" exclaimed the presiding dignitary to his associates. "It seems to me that this is a novel source of income."

"Just from his brain!" exclaimed the presiding official to his colleagues. "It seems to me this is a unique way to make money."

"Ah, gentlemen," retorted the humorist, "it is not every man that has brains to mortgage."

"Ah, gentlemen," replied the comedian, "not everyone has brains to mortgage."


In nothing is the irregularity of our orthography shown more than in the pronunciation of certain proper names. The English noble names of Beauchamp, Beauvoir, and Cholmondeley are pronounced respectively Beechum, Beaver, and Chumley.

In nothing is the inconsistency of our spelling shown more than in how we pronounce certain proper names. The English noble names of Beauchamp, Beauvoir, and Cholmondeley are pronounced respectively as Beechum, Beaver, and Chumley.

One of the "Anglo-Saxun" reformers, meeting Lord Cholmondeley one day coming out of his own house, and not being acquainted with his Lordship's person, asked him if Lord Chol-mon-de-ley (pronouncing each syllable distinctly), was at home? "No," replied the Peer, without hesitation, "nor any of his pe-o-ple."

One of the "Anglo-Saxon" reformers, running into Lord Cholmondeley one day as he was leaving his house, not knowing who he was, asked him if Lord Cholmondeley (pronouncing each syllable clearly) was home. "No," replied the Peer, without missing a beat, "nor any of his people."


Before commons were abolished at Yale College, it used to be customary for the steward to provide turkeys for the Thanksgiving dinner. As visits of poultry to the "Hall" table were "few and far between," this feast was looked forward to with anxious interest by all the students. The birds, divested of their feathers, were ordinarily deposited over-night[Pg 250] in some place of safety—not unfrequently in the Treasurer's office.

Before commons were abolished at Yale College, it was common for the steward to provide turkeys for the Thanksgiving dinner. Since sightings of poultry at the "Hall" table were rare, all the students eagerly anticipated this feast. The birds, stripped of their feathers, were usually stored overnight[Pg 250] in a secure location—often in the Treasurer's office.

Upon one occasion a Vandal-like irruption, by some unknown parties, was made in the dead of night upon the place of deposit. By the next morning the birds had all flown—been spirited away, or carried off—we give the reader his choice. A single venerable specimen of antiquity, the stateliest of the flock, was found tied by the legs to the knocker of the steward's door. And, as if to add insult to injury (or injury to insult, as you please), a paper was pinned upon his breast with the significant motto written upon it: E pluribus unum—"One out of many."

One night, a Vandal-like invasion happened by some unknown people at the storage place. By the next morning, all the birds were gone—either spirited away or taken off—we'll let the reader decide. A single ancient bird, the most impressive of the group, was found tied by its legs to the knocker on the steward's door. And to add insult to injury (or injury to insult, whichever you prefer), a note was pinned to its chest with the meaningful phrase: E pluribus unum—"One out of many."


At one corner of the Palazzo Braschi, the last monument of Papal nepotism, near the Piazza Navona, in Rome, stands the famous mutilated torso known as the Statue of Pasquin. It is the remains of a work of art of considerable merit, found at this spot in the sixteenth century, and supposed to represent Ajax supporting Menelaus. It derives its modern name, as Murray tells us, from the tailor Pasquin, who kept a shop opposite, which was the rendezvous of all the gossips in the city, and from which their satirical witticisms on the manners and follies of the day obtained a ready circulation. The fame of Pasquin is perpetuated in the term pasquinade, and has thus become European; but Rome is the only place in which he flourishes. The statue of Marforio, which stood near the arch of Septimus Severus, in the Forum, was made the vehicle for replying to the attacks of Pasquin; and for many years they kept up an incessant fire of wit and repartee. When Marforio was removed to the Museum of the Capitol, the Pope wished to remove Pasquin also; but the Duke di Braschi, to whom he belongs, would not permit it. Adrian VI. attempted to arrest his career by ordering the statue to be burnt and thrown into the Tiber, but one of the Pope's friends, Ludovico Sussano, saved him, by suggesting that his ashes would turn into frogs, and croak more terribly than before. It is said that his owner is compelled to pay a fine whenever he is found guilty of exhibiting any scandalous placards. The modern Romans seem to regard Pasquin as part of their social system; in the absence of a free press, he has become in some measure the organ of public opinion, and there is scarcely an event upon which he does not pronounce judgment. Some of his sayings are extremely broad for the atmosphere of Rome, but many of them are very witty, and fully maintain the character of his fellow-citizens for satirical epigrams and repartee. When Mezzofante, the great linguist, was made a Cardinal, Pasquin declared that it was a very proper appointment, for there could be no doubt that the "Tower of Babel," "Il torre di Babel," required an interpreter. At the time of the first French occupation of Italy, Pasquin gave out the following satirical dialogue:

At one corner of the Palazzo Braschi, the last symbol of Papal favoritism, near the Piazza Navona in Rome, stands the famous mutilated torso known as the Statue of Pasquin. It's the remnants of a significant piece of art, discovered in this spot in the sixteenth century, and is thought to depict Ajax supporting Menelaus. Its current name, as Murray tells us, comes from the tailor Pasquin, who ran a shop across the street, which was a gathering place for all the town gossipers, where their satirical jokes about the manners and follies of the day circulated quickly. Pasquin's fame lives on in the term pasquinade, making it a European term, but Rome is the only place where he truly thrives. The statue of Marforio, which used to stand near the arch of Septimus Severus in the Forum, was used to respond to Pasquin's jabs; for many years, they exchanged a relentless barrage of wit and banter. When Marforio was moved to the Museum of the Capitol, the Pope wanted to remove Pasquin as well, but the Duke di Braschi, who owns it, wouldn’t allow it. Adrian VI tried to stop him by ordering the statue to be burned and tossed into the Tiber, but one of the Pope's friends, Ludovico Sussano, saved it by suggesting that its ashes would turn into frogs and croak even more annoyingly than before. It's said that the owner has to pay a fine whenever Pasquin is caught displaying any scandalous posters. Modern Romans seem to see Pasquin as a part of their social system; in the absence of a free press, he has become somewhat of a voice for public opinion, and there’s hardly an event where he doesn’t offer his take. Some of his remarks are quite bold for the atmosphere of Rome, but many are very clever and reflect the sharp wit of his fellow citizens, known for their satirical epigrams and repartee. When Mezzofante, the renowned linguist, was made a Cardinal, Pasquin remarked that it was an appropriate choice, as there surely was a need for an interpreter for the "Tower of Babel," "Il torre di Babel." During the first French occupation of Italy, Pasquin released the following satirical dialogue:

"The French are all thieves,
"Not everyone—but Bonaparte." "The French are all thieves.
"Not everyone, but a significant number;" or,
"Not everyone—but Buonaparte."

Another remarkable saying is recorded in connection with the celebrated Bull of Urban VIII., excommunicating all persons who took snuff in the Cathedral of Seville. On the publication of this decree, Pasquin appropriately quoted the beautiful passage in Job—"Wilt thou break a leaf driven to and fro? and wilt thou pursue the dry stubble?"

Another notable saying is noted in relation to the famous Bull of Urban VIII, which excommunicated anyone who took snuff in the Cathedral of Seville. When this decree was announced, Pasquin fittingly quoted the beautiful line from Job—"Will you break a leaf blown about? And will you pursue the dry stubble?"


Literary Notices.

The Naval Dry Docks of the United States. By Charles B. Stuart.—This elegant volume, by the Engineer-in-Chief of the United States Navy, is dedicated with great propriety to President Fillmore. It is an important national work, presenting a forcible illustration of the scientific and industrial resources of this country, and of the successful application of the practical arts to constructions of great public utility. The Dry Docks at the principal Navy Yards in the United States are described in detail—copious notices are given of the labor and expense employed in their building—with a variety of estimates, tables, and plans, affording valuable materials for reference to the contractor and engineer. Gen. Stuart has devoted the toil of many years to the preparation of this volume, which forms the first of a series, intended to give a history and description of the leading public works in the United States. He has accomplished his task with admirable success. Every page bears the marks of fidelity, diligence, and skill. The historical portions are written in a popular style, and as few professional technicalities have been employed as were consistent with scientific precision. In its external appearance, this publication is highly creditable to American typography; a more splendid specimen of the art has rarely, if ever been issued from the press in this country. The type, paper, and binding are all of a superior character, and worthy of the valuable contents of the volume. The scientific descriptions are illustrated by twenty-four fine steel engravings, representing the most prominent features of the Dry Docks at different stages of their construction. We trust that this superb volume, in which every American may well take an honest pride, will not only attract the attention of scientific men, but find its way generally into our public and private libraries.

The Naval Dry Docks of the United States. By Charles B. Stuart.—This impressive book, by the Engineer-in-Chief of the United States Navy, is appropriately dedicated to President Fillmore. It is an important national work that vividly demonstrates the scientific and industrial capabilities of our country and the effective use of practical skills in constructing major public facilities. The Dry Docks at the main Navy Yards in the United States are detailed extensively—providing comprehensive notes on the labor and costs involved in their construction, along with various estimates, tables, and plans, offering valuable resources for contractors and engineers. Gen. Stuart has spent many years preparing this volume, which is the first in a series aimed at documenting the history and description of significant public works in the United States. He has successfully completed his task. Each page showcases commitment, hard work, and expertise. The historical sections are written in an accessible style, with minimal professional jargon while maintaining scientific accuracy. In terms of appearance, this publication is a testament to American printing; few, if any, have matched its quality when published in this country. The type, paper, and binding are all top-notch and worthy of the valuable content within. The scientific descriptions are enhanced by twenty-four exquisite steel engravings, highlighting the key features of the Dry Docks at various stages of construction. We hope this outstanding book, which every American can take pride in, will not only capture the interest of scientific professionals but also find its way into our public and private libraries.

A unique work on the manners of gentlemen in society has been issued by Harper and Brothers, entitled, The Principles of Courtesy. The author, George Winfred Hervey, whom we now meet for the first time in the domain of authorship, seems to have made a specialty of his subject, judging from the completeness of detail and earnestness of tone which he has brought to its elucidation. It is clearly his mission to "catch the living manners as they rise" to submit them to a stringent search for any thing contraband of good feeling or good taste. He is an observer of no common acuteness. While he unfolds with clearness the great principles of courtesy, few trifles of detail are too unimportant to escape his notice. He watches the social bearing of men in almost every imaginable relation of life—detects the slight shades of impropriety which mar the general comfort—points out the thousand little habits which diminish the facility and grace of friendly intercourse—and spares no words to train up the aspirants for decency of behavior in the way they should go. We must own that we have usually little patience with works of this description. The manners of a gentleman are not formed by the study of Chesterfield. A formal adherence to written rules may make dancing-masters, or Sir Charles Grandisons; but the untaught grace of life does not come from previous intent. This volume, however, somewhat modifies our opinion. It is no stupid collection of stereotype precepts, but a bold, lively discussion of the moralities of society, interspersed with frequent dashes of caustic humor, and occasional sketches of character in the style of La Bruyere. Whatever effect it may have in mending the manners of our social circles, it is certainly a shrewd, pungent book, and may be read for amusement as well as edification.

A unique work on the manners of gentlemen in society has been published by Harper and Brothers, titled The Principles of Courtesy. The author, George Winfred Hervey, who we’re meeting for the first time in the world of authorship, appears to have really focused on his subject, judging by the thoroughness of detail and seriousness of tone he has brought to its explanation. It seems to be his goal to "capture the living manners as they arise" and examine them closely for anything that goes against good feelings or good taste. He is an observer of remarkable sharpness. While he clearly outlines the key principles of courtesy, few minor details are too insignificant to escape his attention. He observes the social behavior of men in almost every conceivable aspect of life—detects the small nuances of impropriety that disrupt overall comfort—points out the countless little habits that lessen the ease and grace of friendly interaction—and puts in the effort to guide those aspiring to decent behavior in the right direction. We must admit that we generally have little patience for works of this kind. The manners of a gentleman aren’t shaped by studying Chesterfield. A strict adherence to written rules might produce dancing instructors or Sir Charles Grandisons; however, the natural grace of life doesn’t come from prior planning. This book, however, somewhat changes our viewpoint. It’s not a dull collection of cliché rules, but a bold, lively examination of societal moralities, sprinkled with sharp humor and occasional character sketches in the style of La Bruyere. Whatever impact it may have on improving the manners of our social circles, it is certainly an insightful, engaging book, and can be read for both enjoyment and enlightenment.

An Exposition of some of the Laws of the Latin Grammar, by Gessner Harrison, M.D. (Published by Harper and Brothers.) This is a treatise on several nice topics of Latin philology, which are discussed with great sagacity and analytic skill. It is not intended to take the place of any of the practical grammars now in use, but aims rather to supply some of their deficiencies, by presenting a philosophical explanation of the inflections and syntax of the language. Although the subtle distinctions set forth by the author may prove too strong meat for the digestion of the beginner, we can assure the adept in verbal analogies, that he will find in this volume a treasure of rare learning and profound suggestion. While professedly devoted to the Latin language, it abounds with instructive hints and conclusions on general philology. It is one of those books which, under a difficult exterior, conceals a sweet and wholesome nutriment. Whoever will crack the nut, will find good meat.

An Exposition of some of the Laws of the Latin Grammar, by Gessner Harrison, M.D. (Published by Harper and Brothers.) This is a detailed discussion on various complex topics in Latin language study, presented with great insight and analytical skill. It's not meant to replace any of the practical grammars currently in use but rather to fill some gaps by offering a philosophical explanation of the language's inflections and syntax. Although the nuanced distinctions made by the author might be too challenging for beginners, those who are familiar with verbal analogies will discover in this book a wealth of valuable knowledge and deep insights. While it focuses on the Latin language, it also includes useful hints and conclusions about general language study. It’s one of those books that, despite its challenging exterior, hides rewarding and beneficial content. Those who take the time to explore it will find valuable insights.

An excellent aid in the acquisition of the French language may be found in Professor Fasquelle's New Method, published by Newman and Ivison. It is on the plan of Woodbury's admirable German Grammar, and for simplicity, copiousness, clearness, and accuracy, is not surpassed by any manual with which we are acquainted.

An excellent resource for learning French can be found in Professor Fasquelle’s New Method, published by Newman and Ivison. It's based on Woodbury's outstanding German Grammar and, in terms of simplicity, thoroughness, clarity, and precision, it's unmatched by any other guide we know of.

The Two Families is the title of a new novel by the author of "Rose Douglas," republished by Harper and Brothers. Pervaded by a spirit of refined gentleness and pathos, the story is devoted to the description of humble domestic life in Scotland, perpetually appealing to the heart by its sweet and natural simplicity. The moral tendency of this admirable tale is pure and elevated, while the style is a model of unpretending beauty.

The Two Families is the title of a new novel by the author of "Rose Douglas," republished by Harper and Brothers. Filled with a sense of gentle kindness and emotion, the story focuses on the portrayal of simple domestic life in Scotland, constantly touching the heart with its charming and authentic simplicity. The moral message of this wonderful tale is pure and uplifting, while the style is a perfect example of modest beauty.

A Greek Reader, by Professor John J. Owen (published by Leavitt and Allen), is another valuable contribution of the Editor to the interests of classical education. It comprises selections from the fables of Æsop, the Jests of Hierocles, the Apophthegms of Plutarch, the Dialogues of Lucian, Xenophon's Anabasis and Cyropædia, Homer's Iliad and Odyssey, and the Odes of Anacreon. With the brief Lexicon and judicious Notes by the Editor, it forms a highly convenient text-book for the use of beginners.

A Greek Reader, by Professor John J. Owen (published by Leavitt and Allen), is another valuable addition by the Editor to the field of classical education. It includes selections from the fables of Æsop, the Jests of Hierocles, the Sayings of Plutarch, the Dialogues of Lucian, Xenophon's Anabasis and Cyropædia, Homer's Iliad and Odyssey, and the Odes of Anacreon. With the concise Lexicon and thoughtful Notes by the Editor, it serves as a very useful textbook for beginners.

The Second Volume of Lamartine's History of the Restoration (issued by Harper and Brothers), continues the narrative of events from the departure of Napoleon from Fontainebleau to his escape from Elba, his defeat at Waterloo, and his final abdication. The tone of this volume is more chaste and subdued, than that of the previous portions of the work. The waning fortunes of the Emperor are described with calmness and general impartiality, though the author's want of sympathy with the fallen conqueror can not be concealed. Many fine portraitures of character occur in these pages. In this department of composition, Lamartine is always graphic and felicitous. We do not admit the charge that he sacrifices accuracy of delineation to his love of effect. His sketches will bear the test of examination. Among others, Murat, Talleyrand, and Benjamin Constant are hit[Pg 252] off with masterly boldness of touch. In fact, whatever criticisms may be passed upon this work as a history, no one can deny its singular fascinations as a picture-gallery.

The Second Volume of Lamartine's History of the Restoration (published by Harper and Brothers) continues the story from Napoleon's departure from Fontainebleau to his escape from Elba, his defeat at Waterloo, and his final abdication. The tone of this volume is more restrained and subtle than the earlier sections of the work. The declining fortunes of the Emperor are described with calmness and general impartiality, although the author's lack of sympathy for the fallen conqueror is evident. There are many vivid character portraits in these pages. In this aspect of writing, Lamartine is always vivid and effective. We reject the claim that he sacrifices accuracy for the sake of impact. His portrayals can stand up to scrutiny. Among others, Murat, Talleyrand, and Benjamin Constant are depicted with masterful boldness. In fact, regardless of any criticisms of this work as a history, no one can deny its unique appeal as a gallery of portraits.

Clifton, by Arthur Townley (published by A. Hart, Philadelphia), is an American novel, chiefly remarkable for its lively portraitures of fashionable and political life in this country. The plot has no special interest, and is in fact subservient to the taste for dissertation, in which the writer freely indulges. His sketches of manœuvres and intrigues in society and politics are often quite piquant, betraying a sharp observer and a nimble satirist. We do not know the position of the author, but he is evidently familiar with the sinuosities of Washington and New York society.

Clifton, by Arthur Townley (published by A. Hart, Philadelphia), is an American novel mainly known for its vibrant depictions of fashionable and political life in this country. The plot isn't particularly engaging and essentially serves to showcase the author's enjoyment of lengthy explanations, which he indulges in freely. His portrayals of maneuvers and intrigues in society and politics are often quite amusing, revealing him to be a keen observer and a quick-witted satirist. We aren't sure about the author's background, but he clearly has a good understanding of the complexities of society in Washington and New York.

The Fourth Volume of Cosmos by Humboldt (republished by Harper and Brothers), continues the Uranological portion of the Physical Description of the Universe, completing the subject of Fixed Stars, and presenting a thorough survey of the Solar Region, including the Sun as the central body, the planets, the comets, the ring of the zodiacal light, shooting stars, fireballs, and meteoric stones. This volume, like those already published, is distinguished for its profuse detail of physical facts and phenomena, its lucid exhibition of scientific laws, and the breadth and profoundness of view with which the unitary principles of the Universe are detected in the midst of its vast and bewildering variety. Nor is Humboldt less remarkable for the impressive eloquence of his style, than for the extent of his researches, and the systematic accuracy of his knowledge. The sublime facts of physical science are inspired with a fresh vitality as they are presented in his glowing pages. He awakens new conceptions of the grandeur of the Universe and the glories of the Creator. No one can pursue the study of his luminous and fruitful generalizations, without a deep sense of the wonderful laws of the divine harmony, and hence, his writings are no less admirable in a moral point of view, than they are for the boldness and magnificence of their scientific expositions.

The Fourth Volume of Cosmos by Humboldt (republished by Harper and Brothers) continues the Uranological section of the Physical Description of the Universe, finishing the topic of Fixed Stars and providing a comprehensive overview of the Solar System, which includes the Sun as the central body, the planets, comets, the zodiacal light, shooting stars, fireballs, and meteoric stones. Like the volumes published before it, this one is noted for its extensive detail of physical facts and phenomena, its clear presentation of scientific laws, and the depth and breadth with which the unitary principles of the Universe are revealed amid its vast and complex variety. Humboldt is equally remarkable for the powerful eloquence of his writing as he is for the scope of his research and the systematic precision of his knowledge. The grand facts of physical science come alive with new energy as they are described in his vibrant pages. He inspires fresh insights into the majesty of the Universe and the wonders of the Creator. Anyone studying his enlightening and productive generalizations cannot help but feel a deep appreciation for the incredible laws of divine harmony. Therefore, his writings are just as admirable from a moral standpoint as they are for the boldness and grandeur of their scientific insights.

Dollars and Cents, by Amy Lothrop (published by G. P. Putnam), is a new novel of the "Queechy" school, in many respects bearing such a marked resemblance to those productions, that it might almost be ascribed to the same pen. Like the writings of Miss Wetherell, its principal merit consists in its faithful descriptions of nature, and its insight into the workings of the human heart in common life. The dialogue is drawn out to a wearisome tenuity, while the general character of the plot is also fatiguing by its monotonous and sombre cast. The story hinges on the reverses of fortune in a wealthy family, by whom all sorts of possible and impossible perplexities are endured in their low estate, till finally the prevailing darkness is relieved by a ray of light, when the curtain rather abruptly falls. In the progress of the narrative, the writer frequently displays an uncommon power of expression; brief, pointed sentences flash along the page; but the construction of the plot, as a whole, is awkward; and the repeated introduction of improbable scenes betrays a want of invention, which finally marks the work as a failure in spite of the talent which it occasionally reveals.

Dollars and Cents, by Amy Lothrop (published by G. P. Putnam), is a new novel from the "Queechy" genre, and in many ways, it closely resembles those works that it could almost be written by the same author. Like Miss Wetherell's writings, its main strength lies in its accurate descriptions of nature and its understanding of human emotions in everyday life. The dialogue is drawn out to a tiring extent, and the overall plot feels exhausting due to its dull and dark tone. The story centers around the ups and downs of a wealthy family, who face all kinds of possible and impossible challenges in their lower state, until ultimately, the prevailing gloom is lifted by a glimmer of hope when the story ends rather abruptly. Throughout the narrative, the author often shows an exceptional way with words; short, sharp sentences flash across the page. However, the plot construction as a whole is clumsy, and the repeated inclusion of unlikely scenarios reveals a lack of creativity, which ultimately makes the work feel like a failure despite the occasional talent it showcases.

The Study of Words by Richard Chenevix Trench (Published by Redfield.) A reprint of a curious, but not very profound English work on the derivation of words. The author presents a variety of specimens of ingenious verbal analysis; always suggestive; but not seldom fanciful; relying on subtle[Pg 253] hypotheses, rather than on sound authority. Still his book is not without a certain utility. It enforces the importance of a nice use of language as an instrument of thought. The hidden meaning wrapped up in the derivation of terms is shown to be more significant than is usually supposed; and the numerous instances of cunning etymology which it brings forward tend to create a habit of tracing words to their origin, which directed by good sense, rather than fancy, can not fail to exert a wholesome influence in the pursuit of truth.

The Study of Words by Richard Chenevix Trench (Published by Redfield.) A reprint of an interesting, but not very deep English work on the origins of words. The author provides a variety of examples of clever word analysis; always thought-provoking, but often imaginative; relying on subtle[Pg 253] theories, rather than solid evidence. Still, his book has some value. It emphasizes the importance of precise language as a tool for thought. The hidden meanings found in the origins of terms are shown to be more significant than we usually think; and the many examples of clever etymology it presents encourage a habit of tracing words back to their roots, which, when guided by common sense rather than imagination, can positively influence the search for truth.

Life and Correspondence of Lord Jeffrey, by Lord Cockburn. (Published by Lippincott, Grambo, and Co.) The best part of this book is that in which Jeffrey is made to speak for himself. Except on the ground of intimate friendship, Lord Cockburn had no special vocation for the present task. He exhibits little skill in the arrangement of his materials, and none of the graces of composition. His narrative is extremely inartificial, and fails to present the subject in its most commanding and attractive aspects. He often dwells upon trifles with a zeal quite disproportioned to their importance. These defects, however, are in some degree compensated by the thorough sincerity and earnestness of the whole performance. It is altogether free from pretension and exaggeration. Lord Cockburn writes like a plain, hard-headed, common-sense Scotchman. He tells a straightforward story, leaving it to produce its own effect, without superfluous embellishment. His relations with Jeffrey were of the most familiar character. Their friendship commenced early in life, and was continued without interruption to the last hour. The difference in their pursuits seemed only to cement their intimacy. Hence, on the whole, the biography was placed in the right hands. We thus have a more transparent record of the character of Jeffrey, than if the work had been prepared in a more ambitious literary spirit. In fact, his letters reveal to us the best parts of his nature, far more than could have been done by any labored eulogy. The light they throw on his affections is a perpetual surprise. His reputation in literature depends so much on the keenness and severity of his critical judgments, that we have learned to identify them with the personal character of the writer. We think of him almost as a wild beast, lurking in the jungles of literature, eager, with blood-thirsty appetite, to pounce upon his prey. He seems to roll the most poignant satire "as a sweet morsel under his tongue." But, in truth, this was not his innate disposition. When prompted by a sense of critical justice to slay the unhappy victim, "dividing asunder the joints and the marrow," he does not spare the steel. No compunctuous visitings of nature are permitted to stay the hand, when raised to strike. But, really, there never was a kinder, a more truly soft-hearted man. He often displays a woman's gentleness and wealth of feeling. The contrast between this and his sharp, alert, positive, intellectual nature is truly admirable. With his confidential friends, he lays aside all reserve. He unbosoms himself with the frank artlessness of a child. His letters to Charles Dickens are among the most remarkable in these volumes. He early detected the genius of the young aspirant to literary distinction. His passion for the writings of Dickens soon ripened into a devoted friendship for the author, which was cordially returned. Never was more enthusiastic attachment expressed by one man for another than is found in this correspondence. It speaks well for the head and heart of both parties. Incidental notices of the progress of English literature during the last half-century are, of course, profusely[Pg 254] scattered throughout these volumes. The exceeding interest of that period, the variety and splendor of its intellectual productions, and the personal traits of its celebrities, furnish materials of rare value for an attractive work. With all its defects of execution, we must welcome this as one of the most delightful publications of the season.

Life and Correspondence of Lord Jeffrey, by Lord Cockburn. (Published by Lippincott, Grambo, and Co.) The best part of this book is where Jeffrey speaks for himself. Other than their close friendship, Lord Cockburn had no specific reason for taking on this task. He doesn’t show much skill in organizing his material and lacks the finesse of good writing. His narrative feels very straightforward and doesn’t showcase the subject in its most impressive or appealing light. He often gets caught up in trivial matters with a passion that’s way out of proportion to their significance. However, these flaws are somewhat balanced out by the genuine sincerity and earnestness of the entire work. It’s completely free of pretension and exaggeration. Lord Cockburn writes like a straightforward, sensible Scotsman. He tells a clear story, letting it make its own impact without unnecessary embellishments. His relationship with Jeffrey was very close. Their friendship started early in life and continued without interruption until the very end. The differences in their careers seemed to strengthen their bond. So overall, the biography ended up in capable hands. We have a clearer view of Jeffrey's character than if the work had been done with more literary ambition. In fact, his letters reveal the best parts of his nature much more effectively than any elaborate praise could. The insights into his feelings are always surprising. His literary reputation relies so much on the sharp and rigorous nature of his critique that we tend to associate them with his personal character. We think of him almost like a wild beast hiding in the literary jungle, ready to pounce on his next victim with a fierce appetite. He appears to savor his sharpest critiques "as a sweet morsel under his tongue." But truly, this wasn’t his natural character. When driven by a sense of critical fairness to take down an unfortunate target, "dividing asunder the joints and the marrow," he doesn’t hold back. No pangs of conscience will stop him when he raises his hand to strike. Yet, there never was a kinder, more genuinely soft-hearted person. He often shows a woman’s gentleness and depth of feeling. The contrast between this and his sharp, perceptive, assertive intellect is indeed remarkable. With his close friends, he drops all pretense. He opens up with the candid simplicity of a child. His letters to Charles Dickens are among the most notable in these volumes. He quickly recognized the talent of the young literary hopeful. His admiration for Dickens's writing soon grew into a deep friendship, which was warmly reciprocated. Never has one man expressed such enthusiastic affection for another as found in this correspondence. It speaks volumes about the character and feelings of both individuals. Random mentions of the progress of English literature over the last fifty years are, of course, plentifully [Pg 254] scattered throughout these volumes. The intense interest of that time, the diversity and brilliance of its intellectual achievements, and the personal traits of its notable figures provide rare and valuable material for an engaging work. Despite its shortcomings, we must regard this as one of the most enjoyable releases of the season.

Eleven Weeks in Europe, by James Freeman Clarke. (Boston: Ticknor, Reed, and Fields.) We never should be surfeited with books of travels, if they all evinced the frankness, intelligence, and cultivated taste which characterize this readable volume. Mr. Clarke shows how much can be done in a short time on a European tour. His book is valuable as a guide to the selection of objects, no less than for its excellent descriptions and criticisms. Without claiming any great degree of novelty, it has an original air from the freedom with which the author uses his own eyes and forms his own judgments. He speaks altogether from personal impressions, and does not aim to echo the opinions of others, however wise or well-informed. His volume is, accordingly, a rarity in these days, when every body travels, and all copy.

Eleven Weeks in Europe, by James Freeman Clarke. (Boston: Ticknor, Reed, and Fields.) We would never get tired of travel books if they all showed the openness, insight, and refined taste that this engaging volume demonstrates. Mr. Clarke illustrates how much can be accomplished in a short time during a European trip. His book is valuable both as a guide for choosing places to visit and for its superb descriptions and critiques. While it doesn’t claim to be groundbreaking, it has a unique feel due to the author's candid observations and independent viewpoints. He speaks entirely from personal experiences and doesn’t try to repeat others' opinions, no matter how wise or knowledgeable. As a result, his work is a rarity these days when everyone travels and tends to imitate one another.


Messrs. Lippincott, Grambo, and Co., of Philadelphia, are now publishing a library edition of the Waverley Novels, to be complete in 12 monthly volumes, neatly bound in cloth, with illustrations, at one dollar per volume. They also issue the work in semi-monthly parts, at fifty cents, each part embracing a complete novel. The above will take the place of the edition recently proposed by Harper and Brothers.

Messrs. Lippincott, Grambo, and Co., of Philadelphia, are now publishing a library edition of the Waverley Novels, which will be complete in 12 monthly volumes, neatly bound in cloth, with illustrations, at one dollar per volume. They are also releasing the work in semi-monthly parts, at fifty cents each, with each part featuring a complete novel. This will replace the edition recently proposed by Harper and Brothers.


The third volume of Douglas Jerrold's writings contains some of his most popular and remarkable pieces. The "Curtain Lectures, as suffered by the late Job Caudle," and "The Story of a Feather" appeared originally in Punch—and they have since been repeatedly reprinted, the former in several editions. The thousands of readers who have profited by the lectures of Mrs. Caudle may be glad to learn Mr. Jerrold's characteristic account of the manner in which that household oracle first addressed herself to his own mind. "It was a thick, black wintry afternoon, when the writer stopt in the front of the play-ground of a suburban school. The ground swarmed with boys full of the Saturday's holiday. The earth seemed roofed with the oldest lead; and the wind came, sharp as Shylock's knife, from the Minories. But those happy boys ran and jumped, and hopped, and shouted, and—unconscious men in miniature!—in their own world of frolic, had no thought of the full-length men they would some day become; drawn out into grave citizenship; formal, respectable, responsible. To them the sky was of any or all colors; and for that keen east-wind—if it was called the east-wind—cutting the shoulder-blades of old, old men of forty—they in their immortality of boyhood had the redder faces, and the nimbler blood for it. And the writer, looking dreamily into that play-ground, still mused on the robust jollity of those little fellows, to whom the tax-gatherer was as yet a rarer animal than baby hippopotamus. Heroic boyhood, so ignorant of the future in the knowing enjoyment of the present! And the writer, still dreaming and musing, and still following no distinct line of thought, there struck upon him, like notes of sudden household music, these words—Curtain Lectures. One moment there was no living object save those racing, shouting boys; and the next, as though a white dove had alighted on the[Pg 255] pen-hand of the writer, there was—Mrs. Caudle. Ladies of the jury, are there not, then, some subjects of letters that mysteriously assert an effect without any discoverable cause? Otherwise, wherefore should the thought of Curtain Lectures grow from a school-ground?—wherefore, among a crowd of holiday schoolboys should appear Mrs. Caudle? For the Lectures themselves, it is feared they must be given up as a farcical desecration of a solemn time-honored privilege; it may be exercised once in a life-time—and that once having the effect of a hundred repetitions; as Job lectured his wife. And Job's wife, a certain Mohammedan writer delivers, having committed a fault in her love to her husband, he swore that on his recovery he would deal her a hundred stripes. Job got well, and his heart was touched and taught by the tenderness to keep his vow, and still to chastise his helpmate; for he smote her once with a palm-branch having a hundred leaves." To the "Curtain Lectures" and the "Story of a Feather" Mr. Jerrold has added a very beautiful and characteristic "tale of faëry," entitled, "The Sick Giant and the Doctor Dwarf."

The third volume of Douglas Jerrold's writings contains some of his most popular and remarkable pieces. "The Curtain Lectures, as suffered by the late Job Caudle" and "The Story of a Feather" originally appeared in Punch—and they have since been reprinted many times, the former in several editions. The thousands of readers who have enjoyed Mrs. Caudle's lectures might be interested to read Mr. Jerrold's vivid account of how that household oracle first spoke to him. "It was a thick, dark winter afternoon when the writer stopped in front of a suburban school playground. The ground was buzzing with boys enjoying their Saturday holiday. The sky looked like it was covered with old lead, and the wind blew, sharp as Shylock's knife, from the Minories. Those happy boys ran, jumped, hopped, and shouted, completely unaware that they were little men. In their joyful world, they had no thoughts about the serious adults they would one day become—formal, respectable, responsible citizens. To them, the sky could be any color; and as for that biting east wind—if it could be called that—cutting into the backs of older men at forty, these boys, in their boyhood immortality, had redder cheeks and faster blood for it. As the writer dreamily observed the playground, he mused about the lively joy of those little guys, to whom the tax collector was as rare a sight as a baby hippopotamus. Oh, the glorious innocence of childhood, blissfully ignorant of the future while fully enjoying the present! And as the writer continued to dream and muse, with no clear thought in mind, he suddenly heard, like the distant sound of familiar music, the words—Life Lessons. One moment, the only living beings were those racing, shouting boys; the next, as if a white dove had landed on the [Pg 255] writer's hand, there was—Mrs. Caudle. Ladies and gentlemen, are there not some subjects in writing that seemingly have an effect without any identifiable reason? Otherwise, how could the thought of Curtain Talks emerge from a schoolyard?—and why, among a bunch of holiday schoolboys, did Mrs. Caudle appear? As for the Classes, they must regrettably be regarded as a humorous violation of a time-honored privilege; it might only be performed once in a lifetime—and that one occasion could have the impact of a hundred. Just as Job lectured his wife. Job's wife, according to a certain Mohammedan writer, made a mistake in her love for her husband, leading him to swear that upon his recovery, he would give her a hundred stripes. Job recovered, and his heart was moved to honor his promise, still chastising his partner; he struck her once with a palm branch that had a hundred leaves." To the "Curtain Lectures" and the "Story of a Feather," Mr. Jerrold has added a lovely and characteristic fairy tale titled, "The Sick Giant and the Doctor Dwarf."


A new edition of Professor Anthon's Anabasis of Xenophon, with English notes, is published in London, under the revision of Dr. John Doran. "Dr. Anthon," says the Athenæum, "has edited, and elucidated by notes, several of the ancient classics, and whatever he has undertaken he has performed in a scholarly style. At the same time his books are entirely free from pedantry, and the notes and comments are so plain and useful, that they are as popular with boys as they are convenient for teachers."

A new edition of Professor Anthon's Anabasis of Xenophon, with English notes, has been published in London, revised by Dr. John Doran. "Dr. Anthon," states the Athenæum, "has edited and explained several ancient classics with notes, and everything he has taken on has been done in a scholarly manner. At the same time, his books are free from pretentiousness, and the notes and comments are so straightforward and helpful that they are just as popular with students as they are useful for teachers."


The same Journal has rather a left-handed compliment to American literature in general, to which, however, it is half inclined to make our popular Ik. Marvel an exception.

The same Journal gives a somewhat backhanded compliment to American literature in general, but it seems somewhat willing to make our popular Ik. Marvel an exception.

"There is no very startling vitality in any other of Mr. Marvel's 'daydreams.' Still, at the present period, when the writers of American belles-lettres, biography and criticism, show such a tendency to mould themselves into those affected forms by which vagueness of thought and short-sightedness of view are disguised, and to use a jargon which is neither English nor German—a writer unpretending in his manner and simple in his matter is not to be dismissed without a kind word; and therefore we have advisedly loitered for a page or two with Ik. Marvel."

"There isn’t anything particularly striking in any of Mr. Marvel's 'daydreams.' However, right now, as American writers of literature, biography, and criticism tend to shape themselves into those pretentious styles that help mask unclear thinking and limited perspectives and use a language that's neither truly English nor German—a writer who is straightforward in his approach and clear in his content shouldn’t be overlooked without some recognition; that’s why we’ve intentionally taken our time for a page or two with Ik. Marvel."


At a meeting of the Edinburgh Town Council, the following letter, addressed to the Lord Provost, magistrates, and council, was read from Professor Wilson, resigning the Professorship of Moral Philosophy in the University: "My Lord and Gentlemen—When the kindness of the patrons, on occasion of my sudden and severe illness in September last, induced, and the great goodness of the learned Principal Lee enabled them to grant me leave of absence till the close of the ensuing session now about to terminate, the benefit to my health from that arrangement was so great as to seem to justify my humble hopes of its entire and speedy restoration; but, as the year advances, these hopes decay, and I feel that it is now my duty to resign the chair which I have occupied for so long a period, that the patrons may have ample time for the election of my successor."

At a meeting of the Edinburgh Town Council, the following letter addressed to the Lord Provost, magistrates, and council was read from Professor Wilson, resigning his position as Professor of Moral Philosophy at the University: "My Lord and Gentlemen—When the kindness of the patrons, due to my sudden and serious illness last September, led to the great generosity of the esteemed Principal Lee allowing me a leave of absence until the end of the current session, which is now coming to a close, the improvement in my health from that arrangement was so significant that it gave me reason to hope for a full and quick recovery; however, as the year progresses, those hopes are fading, and I believe it is now my responsibility to resign the position I have held for such a long time, so that the patrons have sufficient opportunity to select my successor."


Among the candidates for the chair of Moral Philosophy in Edinburgh, vacant by the resignation of Professor Wilson, are Professor Ferrier, of St. Andrews; Professor Macdougall, of New College,[Pg 256] Edinburgh; Professor M'Cosh, of Belfast; Mr. J. D. Morell; Mr. George Ramsay, late of Trin. Col., Cam., now of Rugby; and Dr. W. L. Alexander, of Edinburgh.

Among the candidates for the Chair of Moral Philosophy at Edinburgh, which became available after Professor Wilson resigned, are Professor Ferrier from St. Andrews; Professor Macdougall from New College, Edinburgh; Professor M'Cosh from Belfast; Mr. J. D. Morell; Mr. George Ramsay, formerly of Trinity College, Cambridge, now of Rugby; and Dr. W. L. Alexander from Edinburgh.[Pg 256]


Dr. Maclure, one of the masters of the Edinburgh Academy, has been appointed by the Crown to the Professorship of Humanity in Marischal College, Aberdeen, vacant by the translation of Mr. Blackie to the Greek chair at Edinburgh.

Dr. Maclure, one of the leaders at the Edinburgh Academy, has been appointed by the Crown to the Professorship of Humanity at Marischal College, Aberdeen, which became available when Mr. Blackie moved to the Greek chair at Edinburgh.


The motion for abolishing tests in regard to the non-theological chairs of the Scottish universities has been thrown out, on the second reading in the House of Commons, by 172 to 157.

The motion to eliminate tests for non-theological positions at Scottish universities has been rejected on the second reading in the House of Commons, with a vote of 172 to 157.


Mr. W. Jerdan, late editor of The Literary Gazette, is to become editor of "The London Weekly Paper," an "organ of the middle classes."

Mr. W. Jerdan, former editor of The Literary Gazette, is set to take on the role of editor for "The London Weekly Paper," a publication aimed at the middle classes."


The department of MSS. in the British Museum has been lately enriched with a document of peculiar interest to English literature—namely, the original covenant of indenture between John Milton, gent., and Samuel Symons, printer, for the sale and publication of Paradise Lost, dated the 27th of April, 1667. By the terms of agreement, Milton was to receive £5 at once, and an additional £5 after the sale of 1300 copies of each of the first, the second, and the third "impressions" or editions—making in all the sum of £20 to be received for the copy of the work and the sale of 3900 copies.

The MSS. department at the British Museum has recently gained a document of special significance to English literature—the original contract between John Milton and Samuel Symons, the printer, for the sale and publication of Paradise Lost, dated April 27, 1667. According to the terms of the agreement, Milton was set to receive £5 upfront and another £5 after 1300 copies of each of the first, second, and third editions were sold—totaling £20 for the rights to the work and the sale of 3900 copies.


The Athenæum thus notices the death of a late traveler in this country. "The world of literature has to mourn the untimely closing of a career full of promise—and which, short as it has been, was not without the illustration of performance. Mr. Alexander Mackay, known to our readers as the author of 'The Western World,' has been snatched from life at the early age of thirty-two. Besides the work which bears his name before the world, Mr. Mackay had already performed much of that kind of labor which, known for the time only to the scientific few, lays the ground for future publicity and distinction. Connected as a special correspondent with the Morning Chronicle he had been employed by that journal in those collections of facts and figures on the aggregate and comparison of which many of the great social and statist questions of the day are made to depend. In 1850 Mr. Mackay was commissioned by the Manchester Chamber of Commerce to visit India for the purpose of ascertaining by minute inquiries on the spot what obstacles exist to prevent an ample supply of good cotton being obtained from its fields, and devising the means of extending the growth of that important plant in our Eastern empire."

The Athenæum reports on the passing of a recent traveler in this country. "The literary world has to grieve the premature end of a promising career—one that, although brief, was marked by significant achievements. Mr. Alexander Mackay, familiar to our readers as the author of 'The Western World,' was taken from us at the young age of thirty-two. In addition to the work that carries his name, Mr. Mackay had already contributed significantly to research known only to a select few in the scientific community, laying the foundation for future recognition and success. As a special correspondent for the Morning Chronicle, he was tasked with gathering vital facts and statistics on which many of today's major social and statistical issues depend. In 1850, Mr. Mackay was commissioned by the Manchester Chamber of Commerce to travel to India to conduct detailed inquiries into the barriers preventing an adequate supply of quality cotton from its fields and to develop strategies for boosting the cultivation of this important crop in our Eastern empire."


Granier de Cassagnac, long known to France as an impudent, unveracious, reckless journalist and critic, has published some critical Essays, written in his obscurer days. He calls them Œuvres Litéraires. The volume contains articles on Chateaubriand, Lamennais, Lacordaire, Corneille, Racine, Dumas, Hugo, &c.

Granier de Cassagnac, long recognized in France as a bold, dishonest, and reckless journalist and critic, has released some critical essays from his earlier, less well-known days. He refers to them as Œuvres Litéraires. The volume includes articles on Chateaubriand, Lamennais, Lacordaire, Corneille, Racine, Dumas, Hugo, etc.


The readers of the Débats will remember a series of violent, bigoted, conceited, but not unimportant articles in the feuilleton, signed Cuvillier Fleury, devoted principally to the men and books of the Revolutions of '89 and '48. Written with asperity and passion, they have the force and vivacity of passion, although their intense conceit and personality[Pg 257] very much abates the reader's pleasure. M. Fleury has collected them in two volumes, under the title, Portraits Politiques et Révolutionnaires. Politicians will be attracted toward the articles on Louis-Philippe, Guizot, the Duchess of Orleans, the Revolution of 1848, &c.; men of letters will turn to the articles on Lamartine, Sue, Louis Blanc, Daniel Stern, Proudhon, and Victor Hugo, or to those on Rousseau, St. Just, Barère, and Camille Desmoulins.

The readers of the Débats will remember a series of aggressive, prejudiced, arrogant, but still significant articles in the feuilleton, written by Cuvillier Fleury, mainly focused on the people and books from the Revolutions of '89 and '48. Written with sharpness and passion, they possess the force and energy of that passion, though their extreme arrogance and personality[Pg 257] significantly diminish the reader's enjoyment. M. Fleury has compiled them into two volumes titled Portraits Politiques et Révolutionnaires. Politicians will gravitate towards the articles about Louis-Philippe, Guizot, the Duchess of Orleans, the Revolution of 1848, etc.; literary figures will be drawn to the pieces on Lamartine, Sue, Louis Blanc, Daniel Stern, Proudhon, and Victor Hugo, or those on Rousseau, St. Just, Barère, and Camille Desmoulins.


Baron de Walkaener, Perpetual Secretary of the Academy of Inscriptions et Belles Lettres, of Paris, died April 27. In addition to eminence in what the French call the Moral and Political Sciences, he was a very laborious homme de lettres, and has given to the world interesting biographies of La Fontaine and other French writers, together with correct editions of their works. He was a member of the Institute, and was one of the principals of the Bibliothèque Nationale.

Baron de Walkaener, Perpetual Secretary of the Academy of Inscriptions and Belles Lettres in Paris, passed away on April 27. Besides being prominent in what the French refer to as the Moral and Political Sciences, he was a dedicated writer and produced engaging biographies of La Fontaine and other French authors, along with accurate editions of their works. He was a member of the Institute and one of the key figures at the Bibliothèque Nationale.


The first number of Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm's German Dictionary is just out. It would be premature to criticise the work in its present stage; it seems, however, to be most carefully and accurately compiled. It is printed in large octavo form, in double columns, on good paper, and in a clear print. Some idea may be formed of the labor which has been expended on this work, from the fact that all the leisure time of a learned professor has been devoted for the last three years to reading through the works of Goethe alone in connection with it. The first number consists of one hundred and twenty pages, and contains about half the letter A. It is announced to us that 7000 copies had been subscribed for up to the 20th of April. This is a result almost unparalleled in the German book-trade, and not often surpassed in England.

The first volume of Jacob and Grimm's German Dictionary has just been released. It would be premature to critique the work at this stage; it appears to be meticulously and accurately put together. It is printed in a large octavo format, in double columns, on good-quality paper, and in clear print. You can get a sense of the effort that has gone into this project by noting that a dedicated professor has spent the last three years reading through the works of Goethe alone in connection with it. The first volume is one hundred and twenty pages long and covers about half the letter A. We’ve been informed that 7,000 copies were subscribed for by April 20th. This is an almost unmatched result in the German book trade, and it's not often surpassed in England.


The library of the convent at Gaesdorf, in Germany, is in possession of a most interesting MS. of Rempen's De Successione Christi. It contains the whole of the four books, and its completion dates from the year 1427. This MS. is therefore the oldest one extant of this work, for the copy in the library of the Jesuits at Antwerp, which has generally been mistaken for the oldest MS., is of the year 1440. The publication of this circumstance also settles the question as to the age of the fourth book of Rempen's work, which some erroneously assumed had not been written previous to 1440.

The library of the convent at Gaesdorf, in Germany, has a very interesting manuscript of Rempen's De Successione Christi. It includes the entire four books and was completed in 1427. This manuscript is therefore the oldest one still in existence of this work, as the copy in the Jesuit library in Antwerp, which has usually been thought to be the oldest manuscript, is from 1440. The announcement of this fact also clarifies the age of the fourth book of Rempen's work, which some mistakenly believed was not written before 1440.


The new Catalogue of the Leipzig Easter Book-Fair contains, according to the German papers, 700 titles more than the previous Catalogue for the half year ending with the Fair of St. Michael. The latter included 3860 titles of published books, and 1130 of forthcoming publications. The present Catalogue enumerates 4527 published works and 1163 in preparation. These 5690 books represent 903 publishers. A single house in Vienna contributes 113 publications. That of Brockhaus figures for 95.

The new Catalogue of the Leipzig Easter Book-Fair has, according to the German newspapers, 700 more titles than the previous Catalogue from the six months ending with the Fair of St. Michael. The latter included 3,860 published titles and 1,130 upcoming publications. The current Catalogue lists 4,527 published works and 1,163 in preparation. These 5,690 books represent 903 publishers. One publisher in Vienna contributes 113 publications, while Brockhaus accounts for 95.


From Kiel it is stated that Germany has lost one of her most celebrated natural philosophers in the person of Dr. Pfaff, senior of the Professors of the Royal University of Kiel—who has died at the age of seventy-nine. M. Pfaff is the author of a variety of well-known scientific works—and of others on Greek and Latin archæology. Since his death, his correspondence with Cuvier, Volta, Kielmayer, and and other celebrated men, has been found among his papers.

From Kiel, it has been reported that Germany has lost one of its most renowned natural philosophers, Dr. Pfaff, a senior professor at the Royal University of Kiel, who passed away at the age of seventy-nine. M. Pfaff was the author of several well-known scientific works, as well as some on Greek and Latin archaeology. Following his death, his correspondence with Cuvier, Volta, Kielmayer, and other notable figures has been discovered among his papers.


Funny Stories, Original and Selected.

ILLUSTRATION OF HUMBUG.

ILLUSTRATION OF HUMBUG.

"'Tis true, there is a slight difference in our ages, but with hearts that love, such considerations become frivolous. The world! Pshaw! Did you but love as I do, you would care but little for its opinion. Oh! say, beautiful being, will you be mine?"

"It's true, there's a bit of an age difference between us, but when it comes to love, those things don't matter. The world! Whatever! If you loved like I do, you wouldn't care much about what it thinks. Oh! Tell me, gorgeous, will you be mine?"


RULES FOR HEALTH.
BY A SCOTCH PHILOSOPHER WHO HAS TRIED THEM ALL.

Never drink any thing but water.

Only drink water.

Never eat any thing but oatmeal.

Only eat oatmeal.

Wear the thickest boots.

Wear the heaviest boots.

Walk fifteen miles regularly every day.

Walk fifteen miles every day consistently.

Avoid all excitement; consequently it is best to remain single, for then you will be free from all household cares and matrimonial troubles, and you will have no children to worry you.

Avoid all excitement; therefore, it's best to stay single, as this way you'll be free from all household responsibilities and marriage issues, plus you won't have any children to stress over.

The same rule applies to smoking, taking snuff, playing at cards, and arguing with an Irishman. They are all strong excitements, which must be rigidly avoided, if you value in the least your health.

The same rule applies to smoking, using snuff, playing cards, and arguing with an Irishman. They are all intense activities that should be strictly avoided if you care at all about your health.

By attending carefully to the above rules, there is every probability that you may live to a hundred years, and that you will enjoy your hundredth year fully as much as your twenty-first.

By paying close attention to the rules mentioned above, there’s a good chance you could live to be a hundred years old, and that you will enjoy your hundredth year just as much as your twenty-first.


FINANCE FOR YOUNG LADIES.

Taxes on knowledge are objected to, and taxes on food are objected to; in fact, there is so much objection to every species of taxation, that it is very difficult to determine what to tax. The least unpopular of imposts, it has been suggested, would be a tax on vanity and folly, and accordingly a proposition has been made to lay a tax upon stays; but this is opposed by political economists on the ground that such a duty would have a tendency to check consumption.

People object to taxes on knowledge and taxes on food; in fact, there’s so much resistance to all kinds of taxes that it’s really hard to decide what to tax. The least unpopular option that has been suggested is a tax on vanity and foolishness, which is why a proposal has been made to tax corsets; however, political economists oppose this idea because they believe such a tax would likely reduce consumption.


MAINE-LAW PETITIONERS

MAINE-LAW PETITIONERS

ANTI MAINE-LAW PETITIONERS.

ANTI MAINE-LAW PETITIONERS.


MATRIMONY MADE EASY.

MATRIMONY MADE EASY.

The following letter has been sent to our office, evidently in mistake:

The following letter has been sent to our office, clearly by mistake:

"Matrimonial Office, Union Court, Love Lane.

Marriage Office, Union Court, Love Lane.

"(strictly private and confidential.)

"(private and confidential.)

"Sir—Your esteemed favor of the 10th ult. came duly to hand, and, agreeably to your desire, we have the honor to forward to you our quarterly sheet of photographic likenesses of our Female Clients. We were very sorry that the Ladies you fixed upon in our last year's sheets were all engaged before your duly honored application arrived at our Office; but we hope to be more fortunate in our present sheet, which we flatter ourselves contains some highly eligibles. We should, however, recommend as early an application as possible, as, this being leap-year, Ladies are looking up, and considerably risen in the Market, and shares in their affections and fortunes are now much above par. Should you not be particular to a shade, we should respectfully beg leave to recommend No. 7, her father having very large estates near Timbuctoo, to which she will be sole heiress in case of her twenty-seven brothers dying without issue. And should the Great African East and West Railway be carried forward, the value of the Estates would be prodigiously increased. No. 8 is a sweet poetess, whose 'Remains' would probably be a fortune to any Literary Gent. to publish after her decease. No. 9 has been much approved by Gents., having buried eight dear partners, and is an eighth time inconsolable.

"Dude—I received your kind letter from the 10th of last month, and as you requested, we are pleased to send you our quarterly sheet of photographs featuring our female clients. We regret to inform you that the ladies you selected from last year's sheets had already been engaged by the time your esteemed application reached our office; however, we hope to have better luck with this new sheet, which we believe has some very desirable candidates. We would recommend applying as soon as possible, as it is leap year, and ladies are actively seeking partners, significantly raising their desirability, and the value of their affections and fortunes is currently very high. If you are not particular about minor details, we would respectfully suggest No. 7, whose father owns vast estates near Timbuktu, and she will be the sole heiress if her twenty-seven brothers die without heirs. Should the Great African East and West Railway project move forward, the value of those estates would skyrocket. No. 8 is a lovely poetess, whose works would likely be a fortune for any literary gentleman to publish after her passing. No. 9 has been well-received by gentlemen, having lost eight cherished partners and is now grieving for the eighth time."

"Further particulars may be had on application at our Office.

"More information can be obtained upon request at our office."

"We beg also, respectfully, to inform you that your esteemed portrait was duly received and appeared in our last Gent.'s sheet of Clients; but we are sorry to say as yet no inquiries respecting it have come to hand.

"We also respectfully want to let you know that we received your esteemed portrait, and it was featured in our latest issue of Gent.'s sheet of Clients; however, we regret to inform you that we haven't received any inquiries about it yet."

"Permit us further to remind you that a year's subscription was due on the 1st of January, which, with arrears amounting to £4 4s., we shall be greatly obliged by your remitting by return of post.

"Just a reminder that a year's subscription was due on January 1st. We would greatly appreciate it if you could send the total amount of £4 4s. as soon as possible."

"With most respectful impatience, awaiting a renewal of your ever-esteemed applications, and assuring you that they shall be duly attended to with all dispatch, secrecy, and punctuality,

"With the utmost respect and eagerness, I await your valued applications and assure you that they will be handled promptly, discreetly, and on time,"

"We have the honor to be, esteemed Sir,

"We're honored to be, dear Sir,

"Your most obedient Servants,

"Your most obedient servants,"

"Hookham and Splicer,

"Hookham and Splicer,"

"Sole Matrimonial Agents for Great Britain.

"Exclusive Marriage Agents for Great Britain."

"P.S.—We find our female clients run much on mustaches. Would you allow us humbly to suggest the addition of them to your portrait in our next Quarterly Sheet? It could be done at a slight expense, and would probably insure your being one of our fortunate clients."

"P.S.—We've noticed that our female clients often have mustaches. Would you kindly consider adding them to your portrait in our next Quarterly Sheet? It could be done for a small fee and would likely ensure that you remain one of our lucky clients."


FAVORITE INVESTMENTS.

FAVORITE INVESTMENTS.

Lady.—"Goodness Bridget! what is that you have on?"

Lady.—"Wow, Bridget! What are you wearing?"

Bridget.—"Shure! an' didn't I hear you say these Weskitts was all the fashion? An' so I borrer'd me bruther Pathrick's to wait at the table in."

Bridget.—"Really! Didn't I hear you say these Weskitts are super trendy? So I borrowed my brother Patrick's to wear while serving at the table."


AN AGREEABLE PARTNER.

AN AGREEABLE PARTNER.

Fascinating Young Lady.—"I dare say you think me a very odd Girl—and indeed, mamma always says I am a giddy, thoughtless creature—and—"

Interesting Young Woman.—"I bet you think I'm a pretty weird girl—and to be honest, my mom always says I’m a silly, careless person—and—"

Partner.—"Oh, here's a vacant seat, I think."

Companion.—"Oh, I think there's an empty seat here."


DELICACY.

DELICACY.

Young Gentleman.—"I don't want to hurry you out of the room, old girl, but the fact is—I am going to wash myself."

Young Gentleman.—"I don't want to hurry you out of the room, but honestly—I need to freshen up."


THE DOG-DAYS.

THE DOG-DAYS.

Proprietor of the Dog.—"Has he been a bitin' on you, sir?"

Dog Owner.—"Has he bitten you, sir?"

Victim.—"Oh!—Ah!—Ugh!"

Victim.—"Oh!—Ah!—Ugh!"

Proprietor.—"Vell, I thought as there was somethink the matter with him, cos he wouldn't drink nuffin for two days, and so I vos jist a-goin to muzzle him."

Owner.—"Well, I thought something was off with him since he hadn’t had any drinks for two days, so I was just about to put a muzzle on him."


THE AMERICAN CRUSADERS.

Air—"Dunois the Brave."

Air—"Dunois the Brave."

Old Hermit Peter was a fool To lead the first Crusade,
And even skase Godfrey of Bouillon The speculation was worth it; They raised the banner of the Cross. Upon a silly plan—
Not that we hate the Stars and Stripes,
To go against Japan.
All to protect our sailors
The heroic Perry sails,
Our free, informed citizens
Cruising with whales; Who, being tossed upon their shores By stormy winds and waves, I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that. Darn Japanese.
Our battle cries are Breadstuffs and Silks.
With Silver, Copper, Gold, And camphor, too, and ambergris,
All those critters sold: And also sugar, tin, and lead,
Black Pepper, and Cloves too.
And wool fabrics and cotton thread,
Which articles they buy.
We won’t call out to trendsetters No girls, before we fight, Like, when they attacked the Saracens,
Those clueless knights:
But "Exports to the rescue, yay!"
And we'll shout "Imports!" Then throw the shell, or draw the bead. Upon the enemy.
We'll soon teach them to be unsociable. Drop exclusivity; And extend a welcoming hand,
And open their shop wide; First of all, I hope we won’t be forced To get them riled up,
And chew out the rough loafers correctly Into tiny pieces.

POETICAL COOKERY BOOK.
STEWED DUCK AND PEAS.

Air—"My Heart and Lute."

Air—"My Heart and Lute."

I give you all my kitchen knowledge,
Even if the offering is poor; I'll tell you how it's cooked, before
You’re joining me for dinner: The duck is tied up from head to toe,
Then cooked well with butter; And crispy bacon, which reveals
A really delicious smell.
When Duck and Bacon in a crowd You lay in a saucepan,
A spoon circles the container, And gently stir: A tablespoon of flour bring,
A quart of plain water, Then throw in twenty onions,
And stir again gently.
A bunch of parsley and a leaf Of always-green bay,
Two cloves—I keep my language simple—
Go ahead and add your Peas!
And let it simmer until it sings. In a tasty variety:
Then take your Duck, and don't let the string For trussing, it stays.
Make sure to remove the parsley, Also the bay leaf; Serve up your duck—the sauce enhances it. In the usual way,
With pepper, salt, and other ingredients,
I don’t need to explain here: And if the dish brings satisfaction,
You'll eat with me again. [Pg 264]

Summer styles.

Figures 1 and 2. Costumes for Home and for the Promenade. Figures 1 and 2.—Outfits for Home and for the Stroll.

Novelty is the distinguishing characteristic of the prevailing fashions. Give us something new in material, is the cry to the manufacturer. Give us something new in form, is the demand made upon the modiste. Both do their best to meet this demand; and both have succeeded. For the present, whatever is new, fantastic, striking, and odd, is admired and adopted. It will doubtless be a work of time to return to simplicity again.

Novelty is the key feature of current trends. The call to manufacturers is to provide something new in materials. The request to designers is for something new in styles. Both are doing their best to fulfill this demand, and both have succeeded. For now, anything new, unusual, eye-catching, and quirky is appreciated and embraced. It will probably take time to go back to simplicity again.

The costumes which we present for the present month, combine originality enough to meet even the present demand, with good taste and elegance—a union not always attainable.

The costumes we're showing this month mix enough originality to satisfy current trends, along with good taste and elegance—a combination that's not always easy to achieve.

Fig. 1.—Dress of white taffeta with colored figures, a particular pattern for each part of the dress. The ground of the skirt and body is sprinkled with small Pompadour bouquets en jardinière, that is to say, with flowers of different colors in graduated shades. The flounces have scolloped edges; the ground is white, and over each scollop is a rich bouquet of various flowers. The body is very high behind; it opens square in front, and the middle of the opening is even a little wider than the top (this cut is more graceful than the straight one). The waist is very long, especially at the sides; the front ends in a rounded point not very long. The bottom of the body is trimmed with a ruche, composed of small white ribbons mixed with others. This ruche is continued on the waist, and meets at the bottom of the point. There are three bows of chiné ribbon on the middle of the body. The upper one has double bows and ends; the other two gradually smaller. The sleeves are rather wide, and open a little behind at the side. The opening is rounded; the edge is trimmed with a ruche, like the body. There is a small lace at the edge of the body. The lace sleeves are the same form as those of the stuff, but they are longer. Coiffure, à la jeune Femme—the parting on the left side; the hair lying in close curls on each side.

Fig. 1.—Dress made of white taffeta with colorful patterns, featuring a unique design for each part of the dress. The base of the skirt and bodice is dotted with small Pompadour bouquets en jardinière, meaning flowers in various colors with graduated shades. The flounces have scalloped edges; the base is white, and on each scallop, there's a vibrant bouquet of different flowers. The bodice is high in the back and opens squarely in the front, with the middle of the opening slightly wider than the top (this cut is more elegant than a straight one). The waist is quite long, especially at the sides; the front ends in a rounded point that isn't too lengthy. The bottom of the bodice is adorned with a ruche made from small white ribbons mixed with others. This ruche continues onto the waist and meets at the bottom of the point. There are three bows of chiné ribbon in the middle of the bodice. The top bow has double loops and ends, while the other two are gradually smaller. The sleeves are fairly wide and slightly open at the side in the back. The opening has a rounded shape; the edge is trimmed with a ruche, just like the bodice. There's a small lace trim at the edge of the bodice. The lace sleeves are cut in the same style as the fabric ones but are longer. Hairstyle, à la jeune Femme—parted on the left side; the hair styled in tight curls on each side.

Fig. 2.—Redingote of moire antique; body high, with six lozenge-shaped openings in front, diminishing in size toward the waist. The edges of these lozenges are trimmed with velvet; the points meet like bands under a button. Through these lozenge openings there appears a white muslin habit-shirt, gathered in small flutes (this muslin, however close, always projects through the openings, under the pressure of the body). The habit-shirt is finished at the neck by two rows of lace. The sleeve, which increases in size toward the bottom, has also lozenge[Pg 265] openings, confined by buttons, and through the opening is seen a muslin under-sleeve, puffing a little, plaited length-wise in small flutes and held at the wrist by an embroidered band with lace at the edge. The skirt has nine graduated openings down the front from top to bottom, buttoned like the others, through which is seen a nansouk petticoat, worked with wheels linked together, small at top and larger at bottom. Drawn bonnet of blond and satin. The brim is very open at the sides and lowered a little in front. It is transparent for a depth of four inches, and consists of five rows of gathered blond, on each of which is sewed a narrow white terry velvet ribbon, No. 1. The brim, made of Lyons tulle, is edged with a white satin roll. The band of the crown is Tuscan straw on which are five drawings of white satin. The top of the crown is round, and of white satin; it is puffed in crevés. The curtain is blond, like the brim. The ornament consists of a white satin bow, placed quite at the side of the brim and near the edge.—The inside of the brim is trimmed with four rows of blond, each having a narrow pink terry velvet, and a wreath of roses, small near the forehead, larger near the cheeks. Blond is likewise mixed with the flowers.

Fig. 2.—Redingote made of moire antique; the bodice is high, featuring six diamond-shaped openings in the front that get smaller toward the waist. The edges of these diamonds are trimmed with velvet, and the points connect like bands under a button. Behind these diamond openings is a white muslin habit-shirt, gathered in small pleats (this muslin, no matter how close, always shows through the openings, pushed by the body). The habit-shirt is finished at the neck with two rows of lace. The sleeves, which widen toward the bottom, also have diamond-shaped openings secured by buttons, revealing a muslin undersleeve that puffs slightly, pleated lengthwise in small flutes and held at the wrist by an embroidered band with lace at the edge. The skirt has nine graduated openings down the front from top to bottom, buttoned like the others, through which a nansouk petticoat appears, decorated with wheels linked together, smaller at the top and larger at the bottom. The bonnet is drawn with blond and satin. The brim is quite open at the sides and slightly lower in the front. It is transparent for a depth of four inches and consists of five rows of gathered blond, each sewn with a narrow white terry velvet ribbon, No. 1. The brim, made of Lyons tulle, is edged with a white satin roll. The band of the crown is made of Tuscan straw with five drawings in white satin. The top of the crown is round and made of white satin; it is puffed in crevés. The curtain is blond, matching the brim. The decoration consists of a white satin bow placed close to the side of the brim and near the edge. The inside of the brim is trimmed with four rows of blond, each with a narrow pink terry velvet, and adorned with a wreath of roses, smaller near the forehead and larger near the cheeks. Blond is also mixed in with the flowers.

Fig. 3. Bonnet. Fig. 3.—Hat.
Fig. 5. Cap. Fig. 5.—Cap.
Fig. 4. Carriage Costume. Fig. 4.—Carriage Outfit.
Fig. 6. Sleeve. Fig. 6.—Sleeve.

Fig. 3.—Bonnet. Foundation of crèpe; trimming of blond and satin; the curtain of crèpe, edged with narrow blond.

Fig. 3.—Hat. Base made of crêpe; decorated with lace and satin; the crêpe curtain, trimmed with narrow lace.

Fig. 4.—Dress of white muslin, the skirt with three deep flounces, richly embroidered. The body, à basquine, is lined with pale blue silk; it has a small pattern embroidered round the edge; which is finished by a broad lace set on full. The sleeves have three rows of lace, the bottom one forming a deep ruffle.—Waistcoat of pale blue silk, buttoning high at the throat, then left open, about half way, to show the chemisette; the waist is long, and has small lappets. White lace bonnet, the crown covered with a fanchonnette of lace; rows of lace, about two inches wide, form the front. The bonnet is appropriately trimmed with light and extremely elegant flowers.

Fig. 4.—Dress made of white muslin, featuring a skirt with three deep ruffles, beautifully embroidered. The bodice, à basquine, is lined with light blue silk and has a small pattern embroidered around the edge, finished with a wide lace trim. The sleeves have three rows of lace, with the bottom one creating a deep ruffle. — Waistcoat in light blue silk, fastening high at the neck and left open halfway to reveal the chemisette; the waist is long and has small flaps. White lace bonnet, with the crown covered by a lace fanchonnette; rows of lace, about two inches wide, form the front. The bonnet is elegantly adorned with light and very attractive flowers.

Fig. 5.Fanchon of India muslin, trimmed with pink silk ribbons, forming tufts near the cheek, and a knot on the head.

Fig. 5.Fanchon made of Indian muslin, decorated with pink silk ribbons that create tufts by the cheek and a bow on the head.

Fig. 6.Pagoda sleeve of jaconet, with under-sleeves; trimming relieved with small plaits.

Fig. 6.Pagoda sleeve made of jaconet, featuring under-sleeves; trim enhanced with small pleats.

The new materials of the season include some elegant printed cashmeres, bareges, and broche silks, in endless variety as to pattern, and combination of color. There are some beautiful dresses of lampas, broché, with wreaths and bouquets in white, on a blue, green, or straw-colored ground. Among the lighter textures, adapted for both day and evening wear, are some very pretty mousselines de soie, and grenadines. The new bareges are in every variety of color and pattern.

The new materials of the season include some elegant printed cashmeres, bareges, and broche silks, in endless varieties of patterns and color combinations. There are beautiful dresses of lampas, broché, featuring wreaths and bouquets in white on blue, green, or straw-colored backgrounds. Among the lighter fabrics, suitable for both day and evening wear, are very pretty mousselines de soie and grenadines. The new bareges come in every color and pattern you can imagine.


FOOTNOTES:

[A] Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1852, by Harper and Brothers, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the Southern District of New York.

[A] Registered, as per the law, in the year 1852, by Harper and Brothers, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the Southern District of New York.

[B] Continued from the June Number.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Continued from the June edition.

[C] Every one remembers that Goethe's last words are said to have been, "More Light;" and perhaps what has occurred in the text may be supposed a plagiarism from those words. But, in fact, nothing is more common than the craving and demand for light a little before death. Let any consult his own sad experience in the last moments of those whose gradual close he has watched and tended. What more frequent than a prayer to open the shutters and let in the sun? What complaint more repeated, and more touching, than "that it is growing dark?" I once knew a sufferer—who did not then seem in immediate danger—suddenly order the sick-room to be lit up as if for a gala. When this was told to the physician, he said gravely, "No worse sign."

[C] Everyone remembers that Goethe's last words are said to be, "More light;" and maybe what’s mentioned in the text can be seen as a borrowing from those words. But really, it’s very common to crave light just before dying. Anyone can reflect on their own sad experiences during the last moments of those they’ve watched and cared for. How often do we hear requests to open the curtains and let in the sunshine? What complaint is more frequent and touching than "It's getting dark?" I once knew a patient—who didn’t seem to be in immediate danger—suddenly ask to light up the sickroom as if it were a celebration. When the doctor was informed, he said seriously, "That's a bad sign."

[D] Continued from the June Number.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Continued from the June issue.

Transcriber's Notes:

Obvious printer's errors have been repaired, other inconsistent spellings have been kept, including:
- use of accent (e.g. "Notre" and "Nôtre");
- use of hyphen (e.g. "bed-room" and "bedroom").

Obvious printing mistakes have been fixed, while other inconsistent spellings have been retained, including:
- use of accent (e.g. "Notre" and "Nôtre");
- use of hyphen (e.g. "bed-room" and "bedroom").

Pg 198, word "was" removed from sentence "He was [was] the first..."

Pg 198, word "was" removed from sentence "He the first..."

Pg 248, sentence "(TO BE CONTINUED.)" added to the end of article.

Pg 248, sentence "(TO BE CONTINUED.)" added to the end of the article.

Pg 279, word "or" changed into "of" in sentence "...election of my successor..."

Pg 279, word "of" changed into "or" in sentence "...election or my successor..."


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!