This is a modern-English version of Measuring Tools, originally written by Unknown. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.

MACHINERY'S REFERENCE SERIES

Machinery Reference Series

EACH NUMBER IS ONE UNIT IN A COMPLETE LIBRARY OF
MACHINE DESIGN AND SHOP PRACTICE REVISED AND
REPUBLISHED FROM MACHINERY

EACH NUMBER IS ONE UNIT IN A COMPLETE LIBRARY OF
MACHINE DESIGN AND SHOP PRACTICE REVISED AND
REPUBLISHED FROM MACHINERY

NUMBER 21

NUMBER 21

MEASURING TOOLS

Measuring Tools

Third Edition

3rd Edition

 

CONTENTS

CONTENTS

History and Development of Standard Measurements
Calipers, Dividers, and Surface Gages
Micrometer Measuring Instruments
Miscellaneous Measuring Tools and Gages

 

Copyright, 1910, The Industrial Press, Publishers of Machinery.
49-55 Lafayette Street, New York City

Copyright, 1910, The Industrial Press, Publishers of Equipment.
49-55 Lafayette Street, New York City


CHAPTER I

CHAPTER 1

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARD MEASUREMENTS[1]

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARD MEASUREMENTS[1]

While every mechanic makes use of the standards of length every day, and uses tools graduated according to accepted standards when performing even the smallest operation in the shop, there are comparatively few who know the history of the development of the standard measurements of length, or are familiar with the methods employed in transferring the measurements from the reference standard to the working standards. We shall therefore here give a short review of the history and development of standard measurements of length, as abstracted from a paper read by Mr. W. A. Viall before the Providence Association of Mechanical Engineers.

While every mechanic uses standard measurements of length every day and employs tools calibrated according to accepted standards for even the smallest tasks in the shop, there are relatively few who understand the history behind the development of standard length measurements or are aware of the methods used to transfer these measurements from the reference standard to the working standards. We will therefore provide a brief overview of the history and development of standard measurements of length, as summarized from a paper presented by Mr. W. A. Viall before the Providence Association of Mechanical Engineers.

Origin of Standard Measurements

Origin of Standard Measurements

By examining the ruins of the ancients it has been found that they had standard measurements, not in the sense in which we are now to consider them, but the ruins show that the buildings were constructed according to some regular unit. In many, if not all cases, the unit seems to be some part of the human body. The "foot," it is thought, first appeared in Greece, and the standard was traditionally said to have been received from the foot of Hercules, and a later tradition has it that Charlemagne established the measurement of his own foot as the standard for his country.

By looking at the remains of ancient structures, it's clear that they used standard measurements—not in the way we think of them today, but the ruins indicate that the buildings were built using some consistent unit. In many, if not all, cases, this unit seems to derive from a part of the human body. The "foot" is believed to have originated in Greece, and it was traditionally said to have been based on the foot of Hercules. Later, there’s a tradition stating that Charlemagne set the measurement of his own foot as the standard for his kingdom.

Standards Previous to 1800

Standards Before 1800

In England, prior to the conquest, the yard measured, according to later investigations, 39.6 inches, but it was reduced by Henry I in 1101, to compare with the measurement of his own arm. In 1324, under Edward II, it was enacted that "the inch shall have length of three barley corns, round and dry, laid end to end; twelve inches shall make one foot, and three feet one yard." While this standard for measurement was the accepted one, scientists were at work on a plan to establish a standard for length that could be recovered if lost, and Huygens, a noted philosopher and scientist of his day, suggested that the pendulum, which beats according to its length, should be used to establish the units of measurement. In 1758 Parliament appointed a commission to investigate and compare the various standards with that furnished by the Royal Society. The commission caused a copy of this standard to be made, marked it "Standard Yard, 1758," and laid it before the House of Commons. In 1742, members of the Royal Society of England and the Royal Academy of Science of Paris agreed to exchange standards, and two bars 42 inches long, with three feet marked off upon them, were sent to Paris, and one of these was returned later with "Toise" marked upon it. In 1760 a yard bar was prepared by Mr. Bird, which was afterwards adopted as a standard, as we shall see later.

In England, before the conquest, the yard was measured at 39.6 inches, according to later studies, but this was changed by Henry I in 1101 to match the length of his own arm. In 1324, during Edward II’s reign, it was declared that "the inch shall equal the length of three dry, round barley corns laid end to end; twelve inches shall make one foot, and three feet one yard." Although this was the standard measurement at the time, scientists were working on a way to create a consistent standard for length that could be retrieved if lost. Huygens, a well-known philosopher and scientist, proposed using the pendulum, which operates based on its length, to set the units of measurement. In 1758, Parliament formed a commission to examine and compare various standards with the one provided by the Royal Society. The commission had a copy of this standard made, labeled it "Standard Yard, 1758," and presented it to the House of Commons. In 1742, members of the Royal Society of England and the Royal Academy of Science in Paris agreed to exchange standards, and two bars measuring 42 inches, with three feet marked on them, were sent to Paris; one of these was later returned marked "Toise." In 1760, a yard bar was created by Mr. Bird, which was then adopted as a standard, as we will discuss later.

In 1774 the Royal Society offered a reward of a hundred guineas for a method that would obtain an invariable standard, and Halton proposed a pendulum with a moving weight upon it, so that by counting the beats when the weight was in one position and again when in another, and then measuring the distance between the two positions, a distance could be defined that could at any time be duplicated. The Society paid 30 guineas for the suggestion, and later the work was taken up by J. Whitehurst with the result that the distance between the positions of the weight when vibrating 42 and 84 times a minute was 59.89358 inches. The method was not further developed.

In 1774, the Royal Society offered a reward of a hundred guineas for a method to establish a consistent standard. Halton proposed using a pendulum with a moving weight, suggesting that by counting the beats when the weight was at one position and then at another, and measuring the distance between these two positions, a measurable distance could be identified that could be replicated anytime. The Society awarded him 30 guineas for this idea, and later, J. Whitehurst took on the project, finding that the distance between the weight's positions when vibrating 42 and 84 times a minute was 59.89358 inches. The method was not pursued further.

How the Length of the Meter was Established

How the Length of the Meter was Established

In 1790, Talleyrand, then Bishop of Autun, suggested to the Constituent Assembly that the king should endeavor to have the king of England request his parliament to appoint a commission to work in unison with one to be appointed in France, the same to be composed of members of the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Science, respectively, to determine the length of a pendulum beating seconds of time. England did not respond to the invitation, and the French commission appointed considered first of all whether the pendulum beating seconds of time, the quadrant of the meridian, or the quadrant of the equator should be determined as a source of the standard. It was decided that the quadrant of the meridian should be adopted and that 0.0000001 of it should be the standard.

In 1790, Talleyrand, who was the Bishop of Autun at the time, suggested to the Constituent Assembly that the king should try to have the king of England ask his parliament to set up a commission to work alongside one that would be established in France. This commission would consist of members from the Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Science, respectively, to figure out the length of a pendulum that ticks seconds. England did not respond to the invitation, and the French commission first considered whether the pendulum that ticks seconds, the quadrant of the meridian, or the quadrant of the equator should be used as the standard. They decided to adopt the quadrant of the meridian, with 0.0000001 of it being the standard.

The arc of about nine and one-half degrees, extending from Dunkirk on the English Channel to Barcelona on the Mediterranean and passing through Paris, should be the one to be measured. The actual work of measuring was done by Mechain and Delambre according to the plans laid down by the commission. Mechain was to measure about 25 per cent of the arc, the southern portion of it, and Delambre the remainder; the reason for this unequal division was that the northern division had been surveyed previously, and the territory was well-known, whereas the southern part was an unknown country, as far as the measurement of it went, and it was expected that many severe difficulties would have to be surmounted. The Revolution was in progress, and it was soon found that the perils attending the measurement of the northern part were greater than those attending the southern part of the territory. The people looked askance at all things that they did not understand, and Delambre with his instruments was looked upon as one sent to further enthrall them. He was set upon by the people at various times and although the authorities endeavored to protect him, it was only by his own bravery and tact that he was able to do his work and save his life. The Committee of Safety ordered that Mechain and Delambre close their work in 1795, and it was some time afterward before it was resumed.

The arc of about nine and a half degrees, stretching from Dunkirk on the English Channel to Barcelona on the Mediterranean and passing through Paris, should be the one measured. Mechain and Delambre did the actual measuring based on the plans set by the commission. Mechain was responsible for roughly 25 percent of the arc, the southern part, while Delambre handled the rest; this uneven split happened because the northern section had been surveyed before, and the area was well known, while the southern part was largely uncharted for measurement purposes, and many significant challenges were expected. The Revolution was underway, and it quickly became clear that the dangers of measuring the northern part were greater than those in the southern section. People were suspicious of anything they didn’t understand, and Delambre, with his instruments, was viewed as someone sent to further oppress them. He was attacked by the public at various times, and although the authorities tried to protect him, it was only through his own courage and skill that he managed to do his work and stay safe. The Committee of Safety instructed Mechain and Delambre to halt their work in 1795, and it was a while before they could resume.

Having completed the field work, the results of their labors were laid before a commission composed of members of the National Institute and learned men from other nations, who had accepted the invitation that had been extended to them, and after carefully reviewing and calculating the work, the length of the meridian was determined, and from it was established the meter as we now have it. A platinum bar was made according to the figures given, and this furnishes the prototype of the meter of the present time. Notwithstanding all of the care taken in establishing the meter, from work done by Gen. Schubert, of Russia, and Capt. Clarke, of England, it has been shown that it is not 0.0000001 of the quadrant passing through Paris, but of the one passing through New York.

Having finished the fieldwork, the results of their efforts were presented to a committee made up of members from the National Institute and scholars from other countries who had accepted the invitation. After carefully reviewing and calculating the work, they determined the length of the meridian, which led to the establishment of the meter as we know it today. A platinum bar was created based on these measurements, serving as the prototype for the meter we currently use. Despite all the meticulous work done by Gen. Schubert from Russia and Capt. Clarke from England in establishing the meter, it has been shown that it is not 0.0000001 of the quadrant passing through Paris, but of the one passing through New York.

The Standard Yard in England—Its Loss and Restoration

The Standard Yard in England—Its Loss and Restoration

Whether incited by the work of the French or not, we do not know, but in the early part of this century the English began to do more work upon the establishment of a standard, and in 1816 a commission was appointed by the crown to examine and report upon the standard of length. Capt. Kater made a long series of careful observations determining the second pendulum to be 39.1386 inches when reduced to the level of the sea. This measurement was made on a scale made by Troughton—who, by the way, was the first to introduce the use of the microscope in making measurements—under the direction of and for Sir Geo. Schuckburgh. In 1822, having made three reports, after many tests, it was recommended that the standard prepared by Bird in 1760, marked "Standard Yard, 1760," be adopted as the standard for Great Britain.

Whether inspired by the work of the French or not, we can't say, but in the early part of this century, the English started to focus more on establishing a standard. In 1816, a commission was appointed by the crown to examine and report on the standard of length. Capt. Kater conducted a long series of careful observations, determining the second pendulum to be 39.1386 inches when adjusted to sea level. This measurement was taken on a scale made by Troughton—who, by the way, was the first to use a microscope for measurements—under the direction of and for Sir Geo. Schuckburgh. In 1822, after making three reports and many tests, it was recommended that the standard prepared by Bird in 1760, marked “Standard Yard, 1760,” be adopted as the standard for Great Britain.

The act of June, 1824, after declaring that this measure should be adopted as the standard, reads in Sec. III.: "And whereas it is expedient that the Standard Yard, if lost, destroyed, defaced or otherwise injured should be restored to the same length by reference to some invariable natural Standard; and whereas it has been ascertained by the Commissioners appointed by His Majesty to inquire into the Subjects of Weights and Measures, that the Yard, hereby declared to be the Imperial Standard Yard, when compared with a Pendulum vibrating Seconds of Mean Time in the latitude of London, in a Vacuum at the Level of the Sea, is in the proportion of Thirty-six Inches to Thirty-nine Inches and one thousand three hundred and ninety-three ten thousandth parts of an Inch; Be it enacted and declared, that if at any Time hereafter the said Imperial Standard Yard shall be lost, or shall be in any manner destroyed, defaced or otherwise injured, it shall and may be restored by making a new Standard Yard bearing the same proportion to such Pendulum, as aforesaid, as the said Imperial Standard Yard bears to such Pendulum."

The act of June, 1824, after stating that this measure should be adopted as the standard, reads in Sec. III.: "And whereas it is necessary that the Standard Yard, if lost, destroyed, damaged, or otherwise harmed, should be restored to the same length by referring to some unchanging natural Standard; and whereas it has been determined by the Commissioners appointed by His Majesty to investigate the subjects of Weights and Measures, that the Yard, hereby declared to be the Imperial Standard Yard, when compared with a Pendulum that swings in Seconds of Mean Time at the latitude of London, in a Vacuum at Sea Level, is in the ratio of Thirty-six Inches to Thirty-nine Inches and one thousand three hundred and ninety-three ten thousandths of an Inch; Be it enacted and declared, that if at any time in the future the said Imperial Standard Yard is lost, or in any way destroyed, damaged, or otherwise harmed, it shall be restored by creating a new Standard Yard that maintains the same ratio to that Pendulum, as mentioned above, as the said Imperial Standard Yard does to that Pendulum."

It was not long after this act had been passed, if indeed not before, that it became known that the pendulum method was an incorrect one, as it was found that errors had occurred in reducing the length obtained to that at the sea level, and despite the great pains that had been taken, it is doubtful if the method was not faulty in some of its other details.

It wasn't long after this act was passed, or maybe even before, that people realized the pendulum method was flawed. It turned out there were mistakes in adjusting the length measured to sea level, and despite the careful efforts put in, it's questionable whether the method had other issues too.

When the Houses of Parliament were burned in 1834, an opportunity was offered to try the method upon which so much time and care had been spent. A commission was appointed and to Sir Francis Baily was assigned the task of restoring the standard. He did not live to complete the task, dying in 1844. He succeeded in determining the composition of the metal that was best adapted to be used, which metal is now known as Baily's metal.

When the Houses of Parliament burned down in 1834, it created a chance to test out the method that had taken so much time and effort to develop. A commission was formed, and Sir Francis Baily was given the job of restoring the standard. He unfortunately passed away before finishing the work, dying in 1844. However, he did manage to identify the metal that was best suited for use, which is now referred to as Baily's metal.

Rev. R. Sheepshanks constructed a working model as a standard and compared it with two Schuckburg's scales, the yard of the Royal Society, and two iron bars that had been used in the ordnance department. Having determined to his own satisfaction and that of his associates the value of the yard, he prepared the standard imperial yard, known as Bronze No. 1, a bronze bar 38 × 1 × 1 inch, with two gold plugs dropped into holes so that the surface of the plugs passes through the center plane of the bar. Upon these plugs are three transverse lines and two longitudinal lines, the yard being the distance from the middle transverse line—the portion lying between the two longitudinal ones—of one plug, to the corresponding line on the other plug. Forty copies were made, but two of these being correct at 62 degrees Fahrenheit, and these two, together with the original and one other, are kept in England as the standards for reference. In 1855 the standard as made by Rev. Sheepshanks was legalized.

Rev. R. Sheepshanks built a working model to serve as a standard, comparing it with two Schuckburg scales, the yard of the Royal Society, and two iron bars used in the ordnance department. After confirming the value of the yard to his satisfaction and that of his colleagues, he created the standard imperial yard, known as Bronze No. 1, a bronze bar measuring 38 × 1 × 1 inches, with two gold plugs inserted into holes so that the surface of the plugs aligns with the center plane of the bar. On these plugs are three transverse lines and two longitudinal lines, with the yard defined as the distance from the middle transverse line—the section between the two longitudinal lines—of one plug to the corresponding line on the other plug. Forty copies were made, but only two of these were accurate at 62 degrees Fahrenheit, and these two, along with the original and one other, are kept in England as the reference standards. In 1855, the standard created by Rev. Sheepshanks was officially recognized.

Attempts to Fix a Standard in the United States

Attempts to Establish a Standard in the United States

The Constitution empowers Congress to fix the standards of weights and measures, but up to 1866 no legal standard length had been adopted. In his first message to Congress Washington said: "A uniformity in the weights and measures of the country is among the important objects submitted to you by the Constitution, and if it can be derived from a standard at once invariable and universal, it must be no less honorable to the public council than conducive to the public convenience."

The Constitution gives Congress the authority to set the standards for weights and measures, but until 1866, no official standard length had been established. In his first message to Congress, Washington stated: "A uniform system for the weights and measures of the country is one of the important issues presented to you by the Constitution, and if it can be based on a standard that is both unchanging and universal, it will be just as honorable for the public council as it is helpful for the public."

In July, 1790, Thomas Jefferson, then Secretary of State, sent a report to Congress containing two plans, both based on the length of the pendulum, in this case the pendulum to be a plain bar, the one plan to use the system then existing, referring it to the pendulum as the basis, and the other to take the pendulum and subdivide it, one-third of the pendulum to be called a foot. The whole length was that of one beating seconds of time. He made a table to read as follows:

In July 1790, Thomas Jefferson, who was the Secretary of State at the time, sent a report to Congress that included two plans based on the length of the pendulum. In this case, the pendulum was a simple bar. One plan suggested using the existing system that referred to the pendulum as the basis, while the other plan proposed subdividing the pendulum, designating one-third of the pendulum as a foot. The entire length corresponded to one second of time. He created a table that read as follows:

10 Points make a Line.

10 points create a line.

10 Lines make a Foot.

10 lines make a foot.

10 Feet make a Decad.

10 feet make a decameter.

10 Decads make a Rood.

10 Decads make a Rod.

10 Roods make a Furlong.

10 Roods make a Furlong.

10 Furlongs make a Mile.

10 Furlongs equal a Mile.

Congress did not adopt his system, and as England was then working on the problem, it was decided to await the results of its labors. In 1816, Madison, in his inaugural address, brought the matter of standards to the attention of Congress, and a committee of the House made a report recommending the first plan of Jefferson, but the report was not acted upon. In 1821, J. Q. Adams, then Secretary of State, made a long and exhaustive report in which he favored the metric system, but still advised Congress to wait, and Congress—waited.

Congress didn't adopt his system, and since England was working on the issue at the time, it was decided to wait for the results of their efforts. In 1816, Madison addressed the issue of standards in his inaugural speech, and a committee in the House made a report recommending Jefferson's original plan, but nothing was done about it. In 1821, J. Q. Adams, who was then Secretary of State, produced a detailed report advocating for the metric system, but still advised Congress to hold off, and Congress—waited.

What the Standards are in the United States

What the Standards Are in the United States

The standard of length which had generally been accepted as the standard, was a brass scale 82 inches long, prepared by Troughton for the Coast Survey of the United States. The yard used was the 36 inches between the 27th and 63d inch of the scale. In 1856, however "Bronze No. 11" was presented to the United States by the British government. This is a duplicate of the No. 1 Bronze mentioned before, which is the legalized standard yard in England. It is standard length at 61.79 degrees F., and is the accepted standard in the United States. A bar of Low Moor iron, No. 57, was sent at the same time, and this is correct in length at 62.58 degrees F. The expansion of Bronze No. 11 is 0.000342 inch, and that of the iron bar is 0.000221 inch for each degree Fahrenheit. While the yard is the commonly accepted standard in this country, it is not the legal standard. In 1866 Congress passed a law making legal the meter, the first and only measure of length that has been legalized by our government. Copies of the meter and kilogram, taken from the original platinum bar at Paris, referred to before, were received in this country by the President and members of the Cabinet, on Jan. 2, 1890, and were deposited with the Coast Survey. By formal order of the Secretary of the Treasury, April 5, 1893, these were denominated the "Fundamental Standards."

The standard length that was commonly accepted as the standard was a brass scale measuring 82 inches, prepared by Troughton for the U.S. Coast Survey. The yard used was the 36 inches between the 27th and 63rd inches of that scale. However, in 1856, "Bronze No. 11" was given to the United States by the British government. This is a replica of the No. 1 Bronze mentioned earlier, which is the official standard yard in England. It's standardized at 61.79 degrees Fahrenheit and is the recognized standard in the United States. A bar of Low Moor iron, No. 57, was sent at the same time, and this is accurate in length at 62.58 degrees Fahrenheit. The expansion of Bronze No. 11 is 0.000342 inch, while the expansion of the iron bar is 0.000221 inch for each degree Fahrenheit. While the yard is the commonly accepted standard in this country, it isn't the legal standard. In 1866, Congress passed a law making the meter the legal standard, the first and only unit of length to be legalized by our government. Copies of the meter and kilogram, taken from the original platinum bar in Paris mentioned earlier, were received in this country by the President and Cabinet members on January 2, 1890, and were placed with the Coast Survey. By a formal order from the Secretary of the Treasury on April 5, 1893, these were designated as the "Fundamental Standards."

The International Bureau of Weights and Measures

The International Bureau of Weights and Measures

After the original meter was established, it was found that copies made by various countries differed to a greater or less extent from the original, and believing that a copy could be made from which other copies could be more readily made than from the end piece meter, and that better provision could be made for the preservation of the standard, France called a convention of representatives from various States using the system, to consider the matter. The United States representatives, or commissioners, were Messrs. Henry and Hildegard, who met with the general commission in 1870. The commissioners at once set at work to solve the problem presented to them, but the Franco-Prussian war put an end to their deliberations. The deliberations were resumed later, and May 20, 1875, representatives of the various countries signed a treaty providing for the establishment and maintenance, at the common expense of the contracting nations, of a "scientific and permanent international bureau of weights and measures, the location of which should be Paris, to be conducted by a general conference for weights and measures, to be composed of the delegates of all the contracting governments."

After the original meter was established, it turned out that copies made by different countries varied more or less from the original. Believing that a better copy could be made from which other copies could be created more easily than from the end piece meter, and that this would help preserve the standard, France organized a convention with representatives from various nations using the system to discuss the issue. The U.S. representatives were Messrs. Henry and Hildegard, who joined the general commission in 1870. The commissioners immediately started working on the problem, but the Franco-Prussian war interrupted their discussions. They resumed later, and on May 20, 1875, representatives from the various countries signed a treaty to establish and maintain, at the mutual expense of the contracting nations, a "scientific and permanent international bureau of weights and measures," located in Paris, to be managed by a general conference for weights and measures, composed of delegates from all the contracting governments.

This bureau is empowered to construct and preserve the international standards, to distribute copies of the same to the several countries, and also to discuss and initiate measures necessary for the determination of the metric system. The commission adopted a form for the standard as shown in Fig. 1. The lines representing the length of the meter are drawn on the plane A, which is the neutral plane, and will not change in length should the bar deflect. The bar is made of 90 per cent platinum and 10 per cent iridium, about 250 kilograms having been melted when preparations were made for the first standard, so that all of the copies made from this cast represent the same coefficient of expansion and are subject to the same changes as the original. The French government presented to the bureau the pavilion Breteuil, opposite the Park of St. Cloud, which was accepted and put into order and is now the repository of the originals of the meter and the kilogram. The expense attending the first establishment of the bureau was about $10,000 to the United States, and since then its share of the annual expense has been about $900. The standards in the possession of the United States were received through the international bureau.

This bureau is authorized to create and maintain international standards, distribute copies to various countries, and discuss and initiate necessary measures for establishing the metric system. The commission adopted a design for the standard, as shown in Fig. 1. The lines that represent the length of the meter are drawn on the plane A, which is the neutral plane and will not change in length if the bar bends. The bar is made of 90% platinum and 10% iridium, and about 250 kilograms were melted when preparing the first standard, ensuring that all copies made from this cast have the same expansion coefficient and are affected by changes in the same way as the original. The French government provided the bureau with the Breteuil pavilion, located opposite the Park of St. Cloud, which was accepted and renovated and now serves as the repository for the original meter and kilogram. The initial cost of establishing the bureau was about $10,000 for the United States, and since then, its annual share of expenses has been around $900. The standards held by the United States were received through the international bureau.

The Commercial Value of a Standard

The Commercial Value of a Standard

Having at the disposal of the nation a standard of length, the question arises, "What can be made of it commercially, and how do we know when we have a copy of the standard?"

Having a standard length for the nation, the question comes up, "What can we do with it commercially, and how can we tell when we have a copy of the standard?"

Fig. 1. Form of Bar Adopted for International Standards of Length

Fig. 1. Form of Bar Adopted for International Standards of Length

Fig. 1. Design of Bar Used for International Length Standards

In 1893, the Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co. decided to make a new standard to replace the one they had at that date. Mr. O. J. Beale was detailed to do this work. He prepared steel bars about 40 inches long by 1¼ inch square, and after planing them, they were allowed to rest for several months. At the ends of these bars he inserted two gold plugs, the centers of which were about 36 inches apart, and a little beyond these two others about one meter apart. A bar was placed in position upon a heavy bed. This was so arranged that a tool carrier could be passed over the bar. The tool carrier consisted of a light framework, holding the marking tool. One feature of the marking was that the point of the marking tool was curved and had an angle, so that if dropped it made an impression in the form of an ellipse. In graduations, ordinarily, the line, when highly magnified, is apt to present at its ends an impression less definite than in the center, by reason of the form of the objective. The line made with the tool mentioned is short, and that portion of the line is read which passes, apparently, through the straight line in the eye-glass of the microscope. In order to make these lines as definite as possible, the point was lapped to a bright surface. After being placed in position, the microscope, which could be placed on the front of the tool carrier, was set to compare with the graduation on the standard bar from which the new bar was to be prepared. After such a setting the readings were made by three persons, and by turning the lever the marking tool was dropped, making a very fine line, so fine indeed, that when the authorities in Washington began the examination of the bar later on they declared that no line had been made upon these studs.

In 1893, the Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co. decided to create a new standard to replace the existing one. Mr. O. J. Beale was assigned to this task. He prepared steel bars about 40 inches long and 1¼ inches square, and after planing them, they were left to rest for several months. At the ends of these bars, he inserted two gold plugs, with their centers about 36 inches apart, and a little beyond those, two others about one meter apart. A bar was positioned on a heavy bed, set up so that a tool carrier could move over it. The tool carrier was a lightweight framework that held the marking tool. One characteristic of the marking was that the tip of the marking tool was curved and angled, so if it was dropped, it made an impression in the shape of an ellipse. In graduations, typically, the line, when highly magnified, tends to show a less definite impression at its ends than in the center due to the shape of the objective. The line made with the mentioned tool is short, and the portion of the line that is read passes, apparently, through the straight line viewed through the microscope's eyepiece. To make these lines as clear as possible, the tip was polished to a shiny surface. Once positioned, the microscope, which could be mounted on the front of the tool carrier, was calibrated to match the graduation on the standard bar from which the new bar was to be created. After this calibration, measurements were taken by three individuals, and by turning the lever, the marking tool was lowered, making an extremely fine line. So fine, in fact, that when the authorities in Washington later examined the bar, they claimed that no line had been made on these studs.

After making the first line, the carriage was moved along to compare with the other line on the standard, and after the correction had been made by the use of the micrometer in the microscope, the marking tool was again dropped, giving the second line, which was intended to mark the limit of one yard over-all. The same operation was repeated in the marking of the meter. The whole of this work was done, of course, with the greatest care, and, while the theoretical portion of it appears very simple in detail, it required a great deal of time and patience before the last line had been made. The bar thus marked was taken to Washington, and in Mr. Beale's presence was compared by the attendants with Bronze No. 11 and later with Low Moor bar, No. 57.

After making the first line, the carriage was moved to compare it with the other line on the standard, and once the correction was made using the micrometer in the microscope, the marking tool was lowered again to create the second line, which was meant to mark the limit of one yard overall. The same process was repeated for marking the meter. All of this work was done with extreme care, and although the theoretical part seems very simple in detail, it took a lot of time and patience before the final line was created. The marked bar was then taken to Washington, where, in Mr. Beale's presence, it was compared by the attendants with Bronze No. 11 and later with Low Moor bar, No. 57.

In comparing this standard, a method was employed very similar to that used in marking it. The bar, properly supported, was placed upon a box that rested upon rolls, and on this same box was placed the government standard with which the Brown & Sharpe standard was to be compared. The standard was placed in position under the microscope, and after being properly set to the standard, the bar to be measured was placed under the microscope, and by the micrometer screw of the microscope the variation was measured. Three comparisons were made by each of the attendants on each end before determining the reading of the microscope, and after such comparisons and many repetitions of it, the value of the standard No. 2 was found to be 36.00061 inches for the yard, and 1.0000147 meter for the meter.

In comparing this standard, a method similar to the one used to mark it was employed. The bar, properly supported, was placed on a box that rested on rollers, and on this same box, the government standard that the Brown & Sharpe standard would be compared to was positioned. The standard was positioned under the microscope, and after being properly aligned with the standard, the bar to be measured was placed under the microscope, where the micrometer screw of the microscope measured the variation. Each attendant made three comparisons on each end before determining the reading of the microscope, and after these comparisons and numerous repetitions, the value of standard No. 2 was found to be 36.00061 inches for the yard and 1.0000147 meters for the meter.

After this work had been done, Mr. Beale prepared a second standard which he called No. 3, and after examining, as shown above, the error was found to be 0.00002 inch for the yard, and 0.000005 meter for the meter. Observing these variations as compared with the standards originally made, we find they are very close, and it is doubtful if many repeated trials would furnish more accurate work, when we remember that out of forty original standards made, but two are correct at 62 degrees Fahrenheit.

After this work was completed, Mr. Beale created a second standard that he called No. 3. Upon examination, as mentioned earlier, the error was found to be 0.00002 inch for the yard and 0.000005 meter for the meter. When we look at these variations compared to the original standards, we see they are quite close, and it's questionable whether many repeated trials would yield more accurate results, considering that out of forty original standards made, only two are correct at 62 degrees Fahrenheit.

After establishing a yard, the problem of obtaining an inch comes next, and this was made by subdividing the yard into two equal parts, these into three, and the three further subdivided into six parts. It should be particularly noted that no mention has been made of a standard inch, as there is none, the standard yard only existing, the subdivision of which falls upon those undertaking standard work. There is a remarkable agreement between at least three leading gage makers of this country and abroad, and each came to the result by its own method of subdividing the standard yard.

After setting up a yard, the next challenge is figuring out how to define an inch. This is done by splitting the yard into two equal parts, then dividing each of those into three parts, and further dividing the three into six parts. It's important to note that there isn't a standard inch since none exists; only the standard yard is recognized, and the divisions depend on those who are doing standard work. There is a notable consensus among at least three major gage manufacturers both in this country and overseas, and each arrived at their conclusions through their own methods of dividing the standard yard.

Kinds of Measurements and Measuring Tools

Types of Measurements and Measuring Tools

The measurements in the shop may, in general, be divided into measurements of length and measurements of angles. The length measurements in turn may be divided into line measurements and end measurements, the former being made by placing a rule or similar instrument against the object being measured, and comparing its length with the graduations on the measuring instruments; the latter are made by comparing the object being measured with the measuring instrument, by bringing the object measured into actual contact with the measuring surfaces of the instrument. Examples of line measurements are the ordinary measurements made with the machinist's rule, and examples of end measurement are those made by the micrometer, measuring machines, and snap gages. Angular measurements can also be divided into two classes; those measured directly by graduations on the instrument, and those measured by comparison with a given angle of the instrument.

The measurements in the shop can generally be categorized into measurements of length and measurements of angles. Length measurements can be further divided into line measurements and end measurements. Line measurements are taken by placing a ruler or similar tool against the object being measured and comparing its length to the markings on the measuring tool. In contrast, end measurements are made by bringing the object being measured into direct contact with the measuring surfaces of the instrument. Examples of line measurements include standard measurements taken with a machinist's ruler, while examples of end measurements are those made with a micrometer, measuring machines, and snap gauges. Angular measurements can also be split into two types: those measured directly using the graduations on the device and those measured by comparing them to a reference angle on the instrument.

Measuring instruments may also be divided into two classes, according to whether they actually are used for measuring, or whether they are principally used for comparing objects with one another. According to this classification all kinds of rules and protractors belong to the first class, whereas all gages belong to the second class. The ordinary instruments for length measurements, the regular machinists' rule, the caliper square, and the ordinary micrometer caliper, are too well known to require any additional explanation. The same is true of the regular bevel protractor for measuring angles. We shall therefore in the following chapters deal principally with special measuring tools, and with such methods in the use of tools which are likely to suggest improvements, or otherwise be valuable to the user and maker of measuring tools.

Measuring tools can be divided into two categories based on their purpose: those that are actually used for measuring and those that are mainly used for comparing objects with each other. In this classification, all types of rulers and protractors fall into the first category, while all gauges fit into the second. Common tools for measuring length, like the standard machinist’s ruler, caliper square, and the typical micrometer caliper, are familiar enough that they don't need further explanation. The same applies to the standard bevel protractor used for measuring angles. Therefore, in the following chapters, we will focus mainly on specialized measuring tools and techniques that may lead to improvements or be beneficial to both users and manufacturers of measuring tools.


CHAPTER II

CHAPTER 2

CALIPERS, DIVIDERS, AND SURFACE GAGES

Calipers, dividers, and surface gauges

In the present chapter we shall deal with the simpler forms of tools used for measuring, such as ordinary calipers, and their use; surface gages; special attachments for scales and squares, facilitating accurate measuring; and vernier and beam calipers. The descriptions of the tools and methods referred to have appeared in Machinery from time to time. The names of the persons who originally contributed these descriptions have been stated in notes at the foot of the pages, together with the month and year when their contribution appeared.

In this chapter, we will talk about basic measuring tools, like regular calipers and how to use them; surface gauges; special attachments for scales and squares that help with precise measuring; and vernier and beam calipers. Descriptions of these tools and methods have been published in Equipment over time. The names of the individuals who originally wrote these descriptions are noted at the bottom of the pages, along with the month and year their contributions were published.

Setting Inside Calipers

Setting Inside Calipers

Figs. 2 to 4 Setting Inside Calipers

Figs. 2 and 3Fig. 4

Figs. 2, 3, and 4

Setting Inside Calipers

Setting Inside Calipers

It is customary with most machinists, when setting inside calipers to a scale, to place one end of the scale squarely against the face of some true surface, and then, placing one leg of the caliper against the same surface, to set the other leg to the required measurement on the scale. For this purpose the faceplate of the lathe is frequently used on account of its being close at hand for the latheman. The sides of the jaws of a vise or almost anything located where the light is sufficient to read the markings on the scale are frequently used.

It’s common for most machinists, when setting inside calipers to a scale, to place one end of the scale firmly against a true surface, and then, while one leg of the caliper rests against that same surface, adjust the other leg to the required measurement on the scale. The faceplate of the lathe is often used for this purpose because it's conveniently located for the lathe operator. The sides of the jaws of a vise or nearly any spot where there’s enough light to read the scale markings are also commonly used.

The disadvantages of this method are, first, that a rough or untrue object is often chosen, particularly if it happens to be in a better light than a smooth and true one, and, second, that it is very hard to hold the scale squarely against an object. It is easy enough to hold it squarely crosswise, but it is not so easy a matter to keep it square edgewise. As can be readily seen, this makes quite a difference with the reading of the calipers, particularly if the scale is a thick one.

The downsides of this method are, first, that a rough or inaccurate object is often selected, especially if it looks better under certain lighting than a smooth and accurate one, and, second, that it's really difficult to hold the scale straight against an object. It's pretty straightforward to hold it straight across, but it’s much tougher to keep it straight edgewise. As you can easily see, this significantly affects the reading of the calipers, especially if the scale is thick.

Figs. 2 and 3 show this effect exaggerated. B is the block against which the scale abuts. The dotted line indicates where the caliper leg should rest, but cannot do so, unless the scale is held perfectly square with the block. Fig. 4 shows a method of setting the calipers by using a small square to abut the scale and to afford a surface against which to place the leg of the caliper. The scale, lying flat on the blade of the square, is always sure to be square edgewise, and is easily held squarely against the stock of the square as shown. This method has also the advantage of being portable, and can be taken to the window or to any place where the light is satisfactory. When using a long scale, the free end may be held against the body to assist in holding it in place.[2]

Figs. 2 and 3 show this effect in more detail. B is the block that the scale rests against. The dotted line indicates where the caliper leg should sit, but it can’t do that unless the scale is held perfectly straight with the block. Fig. 4 demonstrates a way to set the calipers by using a small square to hold the scale and provide a surface for the caliper leg. With the scale lying flat on the blade of the square, it is always guaranteed to be straight edgewise, and it can easily be kept aligned with the stock of the square, as shown. This method is also advantageous because it’s portable and can be taken to a window or anywhere with good lighting. When using a long scale, the free end can be held against the body to help keep it in place.[2]

Shoulder Calipers

Shoulder Calipers

Fig. 5. Shoulder Calipers

Fig. 5. Shoulder Calipers

Fig. 5. Shoulder Calipers

In Fig. 5 are shown a pair of calipers which are very handy in measuring work from shoulder to shoulder or from a shoulder to the end of the piece of work. For this purpose they are much handier, and more accurate, than the ordinary "hermaphrodites." The legs are bent at AA so as to lie flat and thus bring the point of the long leg directly behind the short one which "nests" into it, as at B, so that the calipers may be used for short measurements as well as for long ones.

In Fig. 5, you can see a pair of calipers that are really useful for measuring work from shoulder to shoulder or from a shoulder to the end of the piece. They're much more convenient and accurate than regular "hermaphrodites." The legs are bent at AA to lie flat, which allows the point of the long leg to sit directly behind the short one that "nests" into it, as shown at B, making these calipers suitable for both short and long measurements.

Double-jointed Calipers to Fold in Tool Box

Double-jointed Calipers to Fit in Toolbox

In Fig. 6 are illustrated a pair of large calipers that can be folded up and put in a machinist's ordinary size tool chest. The usual large caliper supplied by the average machine shop is so cumbersome and heavy that this one was designed to fill its place. It can be carried in the chest when the usual style of large caliper cannot. It is a very light and compact tool. It is a 26-inch caliper, and will caliper up to 34 inches diameter. The top sections are made in four pieces, and the point ends fit between the top half like the blade of a knife, as shown in the engraving. Each side of the upper or top section is made of saw steel 1/16 inch thick, and the lower part or point of steel ⅛ inch thick. The double section makes the tool very stiff and light.

In Fig. 6, you can see a pair of large calipers that can be folded up and stored in a standard machinist's tool chest. The typical large caliper you find in most machine shops is so bulky and heavy that this design was created to take its place. It’s portable enough to fit in the chest when regular large calipers can't. This tool is very light and compact. It measures 26 inches and can measure up to 34 inches in diameter. The top sections consist of four pieces, and the pointed ends fit between the upper half like a knife blade, as shown in the engraving. Each side of the upper section is made of saw steel that's 1/16 inch thick, while the lower part or point is ⅛ inch thick. The double section design makes the tool both stiff and lightweight.

The point section has a tongue A, extending between the double section, which is engaged by a sliding stud and thumb nut. The stud is a nice sliding fit in the slot, and the thumb nut clamps it firmly in place when in use. B, in the figure, shows the construction of the thumb nut. C is a sheet copper liner put between the washers at A. The dotted lines in the engraving show the points folded back to close up. The large joint washers are 1¾ inch diameter, and a ⅝-inch pin with a ⅜-inch hexagon head screw tightens it up. The forward joints are the same style, but smaller. The main joint has two 1¾-inch brass distance pieces or washers between the two main washers. The top section is 12½ inches between centers, and the point sections 15 inches from center to point. Closed up, the calipers measure 16 inches over-all.

The point section has a tongue A, extending between the double section, which is held by a sliding stud and thumb nut. The stud fits nicely in the slot, and the thumb nut secures it firmly in place during use. B in the figure shows how the thumb nut is constructed. C is a sheet copper liner placed between the washers at A. The dotted lines in the engraving indicate the points folded back to close up. The large joint washers are 1¾ inches in diameter, and a ⅝-inch pin with a ⅜-inch hexagon head screw tightens it. The forward joints are the same type but smaller. The main joint has two 1¾-inch brass distance pieces or washers between the two main washers. The top section is 12½ inches between centers, and the point sections are 15 inches from center to point. When closed, the calipers measure a total of 16 inches.

Fig. 6. Large Double-jointed Calipers

Fig. 6. Large Double-jointed Calipers

Fig. 6. Large Double-jointed Calipers

Kinks in Inside Calipering

Kinks in Inside Calipering

Close measurements may be made by filing two notches in each leg of an inside caliper so as to leave a rounded projection between, as shown at E, Fig. 7. Then, with an outside caliper, D, the setting of the inside caliper, B, is taken from the rounded points. The inside caliper can be reset very accurately after removal by this method. A still better way is to have two short pins, CC′ set in the sides of the inside caliper legs, but this is not readily done as a makeshift. To measure the inside diameter of a bore having a shoulder like the piece H, the inside caliper F may also be set as usual and then a line marked with a sharp scriber on one leg, by drawing it along the side G. Then the legs are closed to remove the caliper, and are reset to the scribed line. Of course, this method is not as accurate as the previous one, and can be used only for approximate measurements.

You can take precise measurements by filing two notches in each leg of an inside caliper to leave a rounded projection in between, as shown at E, Fig. 7. Then, use an outside caliper, D, to take the setting of the inside caliper, B, from the rounded points. This way, you can reset the inside caliper very accurately after removing it. An even better method is to have two short pins, CC', set into the sides of the inside caliper legs, but this is not easy to do as a quick fix. To measure the inside diameter of a bore with a shoulder like piece H, set the inside caliper F as usual and then mark a line with a sharp scriber on one leg by drawing it along the side G. After that, close the legs to remove the caliper and reset them to the scribed line. However, this method isn't as accurate as the previous one and can only be used for approximate measurements.

Fig. 7. Methods of Inside Calipering

Fig. 7. Methods of Inside Calipering

Fig. 7. Ways to Measure Inside Dimensions

To get the thickness of a wall beyond a shoulder, as at K, Fig. 7, set the caliper so that the legs will pass over the shoulder freely, and with a scale measure the distance between the outside leg and the outside of the piece. Then remove the caliper and measure the distance between the caliper points. The difference between these two distances will be the thickness M.

To find the thickness of a wall beyond a shoulder, like at K, Fig. 7, adjust the caliper so the legs can easily pass over the shoulder. Use a scale to measure the distance between the outside leg and the outer edge of the piece. Then take off the caliper and measure the distance between the caliper points. The difference between these two measurements will give you the thickness M.

Inside Calipers for Close Spaces

Inside Calipers for Tight Spaces

In Fig. 8 are shown a pair of inside calipers which are bent so as to be well adapted for calipering distances difficult of access, such as the keyway in a shaft and hub which does not extend beyond the hub, as indicated. With the ordinary inside calipers, having straight legs, and which are commonly used for inside work, it is generally impossible to get the exact size, as the end which is held in the hand comes in contact with the shaft before both points come into the same vertical plane. The engraving plainly shows how calipers for this purpose are made, and how used. Any mechanic can easily bend a common pair to about the shape shown to accommodate this class of work.[3]

In Fig. 8, you can see a pair of inside calipers that are bent to make it easier to measure hard-to-reach distances, like the keyway in a shaft and hub that doesn't extend beyond the hub, as shown. With standard inside calipers, which have straight legs and are usually used for inside measurements, it's typically impossible to get the exact size because the part you hold in your hand touches the shaft before both points are aligned vertically. The engraving clearly illustrates how these calipers are designed and used. Any mechanic can easily bend a standard pair to the shape shown to fit this type of work.[3]

Fig. 8. Inside Calipers for Close Spaces

Fig. 8. Inside Calipers for Close Spaces

Fig. 8. Inside Calipers for Tight Spaces

Surface Gage with Two Pointers

Surface Gauge with Two Indicators

Figs. 9 and 10 show a special surface gage, and illustrate an original idea which has been found to be a great saver of time and of milling cutters. It can also be used on the planer or shaper. By its use the operator can raise the milling machine table to the right height without testing the cut two or three times, and eliminate the danger of taking a cut that is liable to break the cutter. This tool is especially valuable on castings, as raising the table and allowing the cutter to revolve in the gritty surface while finding the lowest spot is very disastrous to the cutting edges.

Figs. 9 and 10 show a special surface gauge and demonstrate an original idea that has proven to save a lot of time and milling cutters. It can also be used on the planer or shaper. With this tool, the operator can raise the milling machine table to the correct height without having to test the cut two or three times, reducing the risk of making a cut that could damage the cutter. This tool is particularly useful for castings, as raising the table and allowing the cutter to spin against the gritty surface while locating the lowest point can severely damage the cutting edges.

Figs. 9 and 10. Surface Gage with Two Pointers

Figs. 9 and 10. Surface Gage with Two Pointers

Figs. 9 and 10. Surface Gauge with Two Pointers

To use this surface gage, the pointer marked C in Fig. 9 is set to the lowest spot in the casting, and then the pointer B is set from it with perhaps 1/32 inch between the points for a cut sufficient to clean up the surface. Pointer C is then folded up as shown at C′ in Fig. 10, and the table is raised until the pointer B will just touch the under side of the cutter as shown at B′ in Fig. 10. In this way the table is quickly adjusted to a cut that will clean the casting or other piece being machined, and with no cutting or trying whatever.[4]

To use this surface gage, the pointer labeled C in Fig. 9 is set to the lowest point on the casting, and then the pointer B is adjusted from it with about 1/32 inch between the points for a cut that’s enough to clean up the surface. Pointer C is then folded up as shown at C′ in Fig. 10, and the table is raised until the pointer B just touches the underside of the cutter, as shown at B′ in Fig. 10. This way, the table is quickly adjusted for a cut that will clean the casting or other piece being machined, with no cutting or testing needed. [4]

To Adjust the Needle of a Surface Gage

How to Adjust the Needle of a Surface Gauge

Fig. 11. Method of Adjusting the Needle of a Surface Gage

Fig. 11. Method of Adjusting the Needle of a Surface Gage

Fig. 11. How to Adjust the Needle of a Surface Gauge

Fig. 12. Scale Attachment for the Square

Fig. 12. Scale Attachment for the Square

Fig. 12. Scale Attachment for the Square

Fig. 11 illustrates a method of adjusting the needle of a surface gage. To set the gage 3¾ inches from the table, get somewhere within ¼ inch of the mark on the square. With the thumb and forefinger on hook A, turn the needle till it reaches the point desired. By turning the needle, it will travel in a circular path, on account of the bend near the point, and thus reach the desired setting.

Fig. 11 shows how to adjust the needle of a surface gage. To set the gage 3¾ inches from the table, position it within ¼ inch of the mark on the square. Using your thumb and forefinger on hook A, turn the needle until it gets to the desired point. As you turn the needle, it will move in a circular motion due to the bend near the tip, allowing you to achieve the correct setting.

Scale Attachment for the Square

Scale Attachment for the Square

Fig. 12 shows a device for attaching a scale to a square. This combination makes a very convenient tool to use when setting up work for keyseating, as is illustrated in the engraving, in which S is the shaft to be splined and C the milling cutter. It is also a very handy tool for truing up work on the boring mill or lathe. At the upper left-hand corner, is shown the construction of the parts, which are made of dimensions to suit the size of the scale and the square. For the combination to be successful, it is essential that the blade of the square is the same thickness as the scale.[5]

Fig. 12 shows a device for attaching a scale to a square. This combination creates a very convenient tool for setting up work for keyseating, as illustrated in the engraving, where S is the shaft to be splined and C is the milling cutter. It’s also a very useful tool for aligning work on the boring mill or lathe. In the upper left-hand corner, the construction of the parts is shown, designed with dimensions that fit the scale and the square. For the combination to work effectively, it’s crucial that the blade of the square is the same thickness as the scale.[5]

Attachment for Machinist's Scale

Attachment for Machinist Scale

Fig. 13. Convenient Attachment for Machinist's Scale

Fig. 13. Convenient Attachment for Machinist's Scale

Fig. 13. Handy Attachment for Machinist's Scale

Fig. 13 shows a very convenient appliance. It will be found very useful in the machine shop for setting inside calipers to any desired size. The gage is clamped over the rule wherever desired, and one leg of the calipers set against the gage, the other leg being brought flush with the end of the scale.[6]

Fig. 13 shows a very handy tool. It will be really useful in the machine shop for setting inside calipers to any size you need. The gauge is clamped onto the ruler wherever you want, and one leg of the calipers is set against the gauge, while the other leg is brought flush with the end of the scale.[6]

Setting Dividers Accurately

Accurately Setting Dividers

To set dividers accurately, take a 1-inch micrometer and cut a line entirely around the thimble as at A, Fig. 14, and then, with the instrument set at zero, make a punch mark B exactly one inch from the line on the thimble. If less than one inch is wanted, open out the micrometer and set the dividers to the dot and line so as to give one inch more than the distance wanted. Now with the dividers make two marks across a line, as at a and b, Fig. 14, and then set the dividers to one inch and mark another line as at c. The distance from c to b is the amount desired, and the dividers can be set to it. Great care must, of course, be exercised, if accurate results are required.

To set the dividers accurately, take a 1-inch micrometer and draw a line all the way around the thimble as shown at A, Fig. 14. Then, with the tool set to zero, make a punch mark B exactly one inch from the line on the thimble. If you need less than one inch, open the micrometer and adjust the dividers to the dot and line to give one inch more than the desired distance. Now, using the dividers, make two marks across a line, as shown at a and b, Fig. 14, and then set the dividers to one inch and mark another line as at c. The distance from c to b is the amount you want, and you can set the dividers to it. Be sure to take great care if you need accurate results.

Fig. 14. Method of Setting Dividers Accurately

Fig. 14. Method of Setting Dividers Accurately

Fig. 14. How to Set Dividers Accurately

Combination Caliper and Divider

Combination Caliper and Divider

The combination caliper and divider shown in Fig. 15 is one that is not manufactured by any of the various tool companies. It is, however, one of the handiest tools that can be in a machinist's kit, as it lends itself to so many varied uses, and often is capable of being used where only a special tool can be employed. The illustration suggests its usefulness. The tool can be used as an outside caliper, as an inside caliper, and as a divider. The common form of this tool has generally only one toe on the caliper legs, but the double toes save the reversal of the points when changing from outside to inside work. The divider points may be set at an angle, which permits of stepping off readily around the outside of a shaft at angular distances, where the ordinary dividers are useless. A number of other uses could be mentioned, but any intelligent mechanic can readily suggest them for himself.

The combination caliper and divider shown in Fig. 15 is not made by any of the various tool companies. However, it’s one of the most useful tools in a machinist's kit, as it serves many different purposes and can often be used in situations where only a specialized tool would work. The illustration highlights how useful it is. The tool can function as an outside caliper, an inside caliper, and a divider. The standard version of this tool usually has only one toe on each caliper leg, but the double toes eliminate the need to reverse the points when switching between outside and inside work. The divider points can be set at an angle, which makes it easy to measure around the outside of a shaft at specific distances, where regular dividers don't work. There are many other uses that could be discussed, but any skilled mechanic can easily think of them on their own.

Fig. 15. Combination Caliper and Divider

Fig. 15. Combination Caliper and Divider

Fig. 15. Combination Caliper and Divider

Attachment for Vernier Calipers

Tool for Vernier Calipers

While vernier and slide calipers are very handy shop tools, their usefulness is much more limited than it ought to be for such expensive instruments. In order to increase the usefulness of these tools, the attachments shown in Fig. 16 may be made. In the upper left-hand part of the engraving the details of a useful addition to the caliper are shown. A is made of machine steel, while the tongue B is of tool steel, hardened and ground and lapped to a thickness of 0.150 inch, the top and bottom being absolutely parallel. This tongue is secured to A by the two rivets CC. The thumb-screw D is used for fastening the attachment to the sliding jaw of the vernier or slide caliper. In the upper part of the engraving is shown the base, which is of machine steel, with the slot F milled for the reception of the fixed jaw of the caliper. The set-screws GGG are put in at a slight angle so that the caliper will be held firmly and squarely in this base. In the figure to the left these pieces are shown in the position for forming a height gage, for which purpose the attachment is most commonly used. As a test of the accuracy of its construction when the attachment is placed in this position, the tongue B should make a perfect joint with the fixed jaw of the caliper, and the vernier should give a reading of exactly 0.150. When it is desirable that the tongue B should overhang, the base E is pushed back even with the stationary jaw, as shown in the engraving to the right. In this position it is used for laying out and testing bushings in jigs, etc. The illustration shows the tool in use for this purpose, K being the jig to be tested. All measurements are from the center line upon which the bushing No. 1 is placed. Taking this as a starting point we find the caliper to read 1 inch. Bushing No. 2, which is undergoing the test, should be ⅝ inch from this center line. It has a ¼-inch hole, and we therefore insert a plug of this diameter. Now adjust the tongue of the caliper to the bottom of this plug (as shown in the engraving) and the vernier should read 1.625 minus one-half the diameter of the plug, or 1.500, and any variation from this will show the error of the jig. In this case the top surface of B was used and no allowance had to be made for its thickness. In case the bottom surface is used, 0.150 must be deducted from the reading of the caliper.

While vernier and slide calipers are really useful tools in the shop, their functionality is much more limited than it should be for such pricey instruments. To enhance the usefulness of these tools, you can make the attachments shown in Fig. 16. In the upper left of the engraving, you can see details of a helpful addition to the caliper. A is made of machine steel, while the tongue B is made of tool steel, hardened, ground, and lapped to a thickness of 0.150 inch, with the top and bottom perfectly parallel. This tongue is attached to A using the two rivets CC. The thumb-screw D is used to secure the attachment to the sliding jaw of the vernier or slide caliper. In the upper part of the engraving, the base is shown, made of machine steel, with the slot F milled to fit the fixed jaw of the caliper. The set-screws GGG are installed at a slight angle so that the caliper is held firmly and squarely in this base. In the figure to the left, these pieces are shown in the position for creating a height gage, which is the most common use for the attachment. To test the accuracy of its construction, when the attachment is in this position, the tongue B should align perfectly with the fixed jaw of the caliper, and the vernier should read exactly 0.150. If you want the tongue B to overhang, the base E is pushed back to align with the stationary jaw, as shown in the engraving to the right. In this position, it is used for laying out and testing bushings in jigs, etc. The illustration shows the tool in use for this, with K being the jig being tested. All measurements are taken from the center line where bushing No. 1 is positioned. Starting from this point, the caliper reads 1 inch. Bushing No. 2, which is being tested, should be ⅝ inch from this center line. It has a ¼-inch hole, so we insert a plug of that diameter. Now, adjust the tongue of the caliper to the bottom of this plug (as illustrated in the engraving), and the vernier should read 1.625 minus half the diameter of the plug, or 1.500. Any variation from this will reveal the error of the jig. In this case, the top surface of B was used, so no allowance needed to be made for its thickness. If the bottom surface is used, you must subtract 0.150 from the reading of the caliper.

Fig. 16. Attachment for Vernier Calipers

Fig. 16. Attachment for Vernier Calipers

Fig. 16. Attachment for Vernier Calipers

It is very easy to make a mistake in setting a bushing, and such a mistake is equally hard to detect unless some such means of measuring as this is at hand. It often happens that jigs and fixtures are put into use containing such errors, and the trouble is not discovered until many dollars' worth of work has been finished and found worthless. The illustration shows but one of the many uses to which this attachment may be applied. The figures given on the details are correct for making an attachment to be used upon the Brown & Sharpe vernier caliper, but for other calipers they would, of course, have to be altered to suit.[7]

It's very easy to mess up when setting a bushing, and that mistake is just as difficult to spot unless you have a measuring tool like this available. It often happens that jigs and fixtures are used with such errors, and the issue isn't caught until a lot of work has been completed and found to be worthless. The illustration shows just one of the many ways this attachment can be used. The measurements provided for the details are accurate for creating an attachment for the Brown & Sharpe vernier caliper, but they would need to be adjusted for other calipers, of course.[7]

Improved Micrometer Beam Caliper

Enhanced Micrometer Beam Caliper

Fig. 17. Improved Micrometer Beam Caliper

Fig. 17. Improved Micrometer Beam Caliper

Fig. 17. Enhanced Micrometer Beam Caliper

In a beam caliper having a sliding micrometer jaw with or without a separate clamping slide, it is necessary to have the beam divided into unit spaces, at which the jaw or slide may be accurately fixed, the micrometer screw then being used to cover the distance between the divisions; but it is difficult to construct a beam caliper of this type with holes for a taper setting pin, at exactly equal distances apart; consequently a plan that is generally followed in making such tools is to provide as many holes through the slide and beam as there are inch divisions, each hole being drilled and reamed through both the slide and beam at once. If it were attempted to drill the holes through the beam at exactly one inch apart, having only one hole in the clamping head and using it as a jig for the purpose, it would be found very difficult, if not impossible, to get the holes all of one size and exactly one inch apart. The design of the micrometer beam caliper shown in Fig. 17, which has been patented by Mr. Frank Spalding, Providence, Rhode Island, is such, however, that it is not necessary to drill more than one hole through the clamping slide. The beam F is grooved longitudinally, and in the groove are fitted hardened steel adjusting blocks in which a taper hole D is accurately finished. Between the blocks are filling pieces G, which are brazed or otherwise fastened in the groove. Holes are drilled, tapped, and countersunk between the blocks and the filling pieces G, in which are fitted taper head screws EE1. The construction is thus obviously such that the blocks may be shifted longitudinally by loosening one screw and tightening the other. In constructing the caliper, the holes through the beam are drilled as accurately as possible, one inch apart, and centered in the longitudinal groove, but are made larger than the holes in the blocks, so as to provide for slight adjustment.

In a beam caliper with a sliding micrometer jaw, whether or not it has a separate clamping slide, the beam needs to be marked in unit spaces where the jaw or slide can be precisely fixed. The micrometer screw is then used to measure the distance between these divisions. However, it's challenging to create a beam caliper like this with holes for a taper setting pin that are evenly spaced. Therefore, a common approach when making these tools is to provide as many holes in the slide and beam as there are inch divisions, with each hole being drilled and reamed through both the slide and beam at the same time. If one were to drill the holes in the beam exactly one inch apart, using only one hole in the clamping head as a jig, it would be quite difficult—if not impossible—to ensure that all the holes are the same size and exactly one inch apart. The design of the micrometer beam caliper shown in Fig. 17, patented by Mr. Frank Spalding from Providence, Rhode Island, solves this problem by requiring no more than one hole to be drilled through the clamping slide. The beam F has a longitudinal groove, and within that groove, hardened steel adjusting blocks are fitted, which have a precisely finished taper hole D. Between these blocks are filling pieces G, which are either brazed or otherwise secured in the groove. Additional holes are drilled, tapped, and countersunk between the blocks and the filling pieces G, and taper head screws EE1 are inserted there. This design allows the blocks to be moved back and forth by loosening one screw and tightening the other. When constructing the caliper, the holes in the beam are drilled as precisely as possible, one inch apart, and centered in the longitudinal groove, but they are made larger than the holes in the blocks to allow for slight adjustments.

Large Beam Caliper

Large Beam Caliper

Fig. 18. Large Beam Caliper

Fig. 18. Large Beam Caliper

Fig. 18. Big Beam Caliper

Fig. 18 shows a large beam caliper designed for machinists and patternmakers. It consists of a beam MN and the legs R and S, made of cherry wood to the dimensions indicated. The legs are secured in position on the beam by means of the thumb screws A, which jam against the gibs C at the points of the screws. The gibs have holes countersunk for the screws to enter, to hold them approximately in place, and the nuts B are of brass, fitted into the filling pieces P that keep them from turning. The filling pieces are riveted to the legs by means of cherry dowels D. One leg S is provided with a fine adjustment consisting of flexible steel spring H, ending in a point which is adjusted by the thumb screw E. This screw is locked in adjustment by the check nut G bearing against the brass nut F, which is inserted in the leg as shown.[8]

Fig. 18 shows a large beam caliper designed for machinists and pattern makers. It consists of a beam MN and the legs R and S, made of cherry wood to the specified dimensions. The legs are secured in position on the beam using thumb screws A, which press against the gibs C at the screw points. The gibs have countersunk holes for the screws to enter, keeping them roughly in place, and the nuts B are brass, fitted into filling pieces P that prevent them from turning. The filling pieces are riveted to the legs using cherry dowels D. One leg S features a fine adjustment made up of a flexible steel spring H, ending in a point that is adjusted by the thumb screw E. This screw is locked in place by the check nut G, which presses against the brass nut F, inserted in the leg as shown.[8]


CHAPTER III

Chapter 3

MICROMETER MEASURING INSTRUMENTS

Micrometer Measuring Tools

Of all measuring instruments used in the shop intended for accurate measurements, those working on the principle of the ordinary micrometer calipers are the most common. In the present chapter we shall describe and illustrate a number of different designs of these tools, intended to be used for various purposes. The instruments shown in Figs. 19 to 23 were built, in leisure hours, by Mr. A. L. Monrad, of East Hartford, Conn.

Of all the measuring tools used in the shop for precise measurements, those that operate on the principle of regular micrometer calipers are the most common. In this chapter, we will describe and illustrate several different designs of these tools, meant for various purposes. The instruments shown in Figs. 19 to 23 were built in Mr. A. L. Monrad's free time, from East Hartford, Conn.

Micrometer for Snap Gages

Micrometer for Snap Gages

Fig. 19. Micrometer for Snap Gages

Fig. 19. Micrometer for Snap Gages

Fig. 19. Micrometer for Snap Gages

Fig. 19 shows a form of micrometer that has proved very handy for measuring snap gages, and thicknesses, and can also be used as a small height gage to measure the distance from a shoulder to the base, as shown in Fig. 20. In measuring snap gages or thicknesses, the outside and inside of the measuring disks are used, respectively. This instrument may also come in very handy when setting tools on the planer or shaper. As will be seen in the engraving, there are two sets of graduations on the sleeve A, thus enabling the operator to tell at a glance what measurement is obtained from the outside or the inside of the measuring disks. Each of the disks is 0.100 inch thick, so that the range of the micrometer is 0.800 and 1.000 inch for the outside and inside, respectively. The details of the instrument are as follows:

Fig. 19 shows a type of micrometer that has proven very useful for measuring snap gages and thicknesses, and it can also serve as a small height gauge to measure the distance from a shoulder to the base, as depicted in Fig. 20. When measuring snap gages or thicknesses, the outside and inside of the measuring disks are used, respectively. This tool can also be very helpful when setting tools on the planer or shaper. As you can see in the engraving, there are two sets of graduations on the sleeve A, allowing the operator to quickly determine the measurement from either the outside or the inside of the measuring disks. Each disk is 0.100 inch thick, which gives the micrometer a range of 0.800 inch and 1.000 inch for the outside and inside, respectively. The details of the instrument are as follows:

The sleeve A is composed of the inside measuring disk, the graduated sleeve, and the micrometer nut combined. On the disk are two projections KK, which are knurled, thus providing a grip when operating the tool. The sleeve is threaded on the inside of one end, which acts as a micrometer nut, and the outside of this same end is threaded to receive the adjusting nut D. The sleeve has two slots, each placed 90 degrees from the graduations, and these provide for compensation for wear. The disk part is hardened by heating in a lead bath, and is finished by grinding and lapping. The barrel B is the same as a regular micrometer barrel, and is graduated with 25 divisions. Spindle E consists of the outside disk and the micrometer screw, and the barrel B fits on its end, which is tapped out to receive the speeder C, which serves to hold the barrel in position. The thread is ¼ inch, 40 pitch, and the disk and unthreaded parts are hardened, ground and lapped. To adjust this, instrument, loosen the speeder C and turn the barrel until the proper adjustment is obtained. Then lock the barrel by tightening the speeder again.[9]

The sleeve A consists of the inner measuring disk, the graduated sleeve, and the micrometer nut combined. The disk has two knurled projections KK for a better grip when using the tool. One end of the sleeve is internally threaded to act as a micrometer nut, while the outer side of the same end is threaded to hold the adjusting nut D. There are two slots on the sleeve, each positioned 90 degrees from the graduations, allowing for compensation for wear. The disk portion is hardened by heating in a lead bath and is finished with grinding and lapping. The barrel B is similar to a standard micrometer barrel and features 25 divisions. The spindle E comprises the outer disk and the micrometer screw, while the barrel B fits onto its end, which is tapped to accommodate the speeder C, designed to keep the barrel in place. The thread measures ¼ inch with a 40 pitch, and both the disk and unthreaded parts are hardened, ground, and lapped. To adjust this instrument, loosen the speeder C and rotate the barrel until the correct adjustment is achieved. Then, secure the barrel by tightening the speeder again.[9]

Fig. 20. Micrometer in Fig. 19 used as Height Gage

Fig. 20. Micrometer in Fig. 19 used as Height Gage

Fig. 20. Micrometer in Fig. 19 used as Height Gauge

Micrometer Caliper Square

Micrometer Caliper Square

Fig. 21 shows an assembled view and the details of a micrometer caliper square which, if accurately made, is equal and often preferable to the vernier caliper now so generally used. One of its advantages over the vernier is that when the measurement is taken, it can be readily discerned without straining the eyes, and this instrument is as easy to manipulate as the regular micrometer.

Fig. 21 shows an assembled view and details of a micrometer caliper square which, if made correctly, is just as good and often better than the vernier caliper that is widely used today. One of its advantages over the vernier is that when measuring, it's easy to read without straining your eyes, and this tool is as simple to use as the standard micrometer.

In the details, part A, which is the main body of the instrument, is made of tool steel, the forward or jaw end being solid with the body. This end is hardened, and the jaw ground and lapped. The body is bored out and two flats milled on the outside, which lighten it up and make it neat in appearance. The jaw end is counterbored out with a 45-degree counterbore to form a bearing for the forward end of the micrometer screw. A slot, ⅛ inch in width, extends from the fixed jaw to the other end, and in this slides the movable jaw C. There are 44 divisions along the side of this slot, each division being 0.050 inch apart, giving the tool a range of 2.000 inches for outside and 2.200 inches for inside measurements. The screw B is the most essential part of this tool, its construction requiring great accuracy. Its diameter is ⅜ inch and it is cut with 20 threads per inch. On its forward end fits the cone F, which is hardened and ground, the round part acting as the forward bearing of the screw and fitting in the 45-degree counterbored hole in the body A. On its other end fits the graduated barrel D and also the speeder G.

In the details, part A, which is the main part of the tool, is made of tool steel. The jaw end is solid with the body. This end is hardened, and the jaw is ground and polished. The body is hollowed out, and two flat sections are milled on the outside to reduce weight and enhance its neat appearance. The jaw end is counterbored with a 45-degree angle to create a bearing for the front end of the micrometer screw. A slot, ⅛ inch wide, runs from the fixed jaw to the other end, allowing the movable jaw C to slide within it. There are 44 divisions along the side of this slot, each spaced 0.050 inches apart, providing the tool with a range of 2.000 inches for outside measurements and 2.200 inches for inside measurements. The screw B is the most critical part of this tool, and its construction requires great precision. Its diameter is ⅜ inch and it is threaded with 20 threads per inch. The hardened and ground cone F fits at the forward end, with the round part serving as the front bearing of the screw, fitting into the 45-degree counterbored hole in body A. On its other end, the graduated barrel D and the speeder G are attached.

Fig. 21. Micrometer Caliper Square

Fig. 21. Micrometer Caliper Square

Fig. 21. Micrometer Caliper Square

The barrel is graduated in fifty divisions, each division equaling 0.001 inch. On the inside of the barrel is a 45-degree bearing which rides on the cone M, the cone being held stationary on the end of the body. Thus it will be seen that both front and back ends of the micrometer screw are carried in cone bearings, which give a very small point of contact, thereby causing but little friction and preventing any danger of gumming up so as to run hard. The sliding jaw C is made of tool steel, hardened, ground and lapped, and combined with it is the micrometer nut which is drawn to a spring temper. This nut is split and adjusted by two screws to compensate for wear. On this jaw are the two zero marks that tell at a glance the outside or inside measurements taken. The screw and washer, marked H and I, go onto the end of the micrometer screw and take up the end play. To make a neat appearance, the cap E is placed in the forward counterbored hole, being held in place by a tight fit. The adjustment of the tool is accomplished by loosening the speeder G and turning the barrel on the screw; when the adjustment is made, the speeder is again tightened down and the barrel locked.[10]

The barrel has fifty divisions, with each division equal to 0.001 inch. Inside the barrel, there’s a 45-degree bearing that sits on the cone M, which is fixed at the end of the body. This setup allows both the front and back ends of the micrometer screw to be supported by cone bearings, resulting in a very small contact point, which minimizes friction and prevents any risk of sticking that would make it hard to operate. The sliding jaw C is made of hardened tool steel that’s been ground and lapped, and it includes the micrometer nut that is set to a spring temper. This nut is split and adjusted with two screws to account for wear. On this jaw, there are two zero marks that show, at a glance, whether outside or inside measurements are being taken. The screw and washer, labeled H and I, fit onto the end of the micrometer screw and eliminate end play. To give it a tidy look, the cap E is placed in the forward counterbored hole, secured by a tight fit. You can adjust the tool by loosening the speeder G and rotating the barrel on the screw; once the adjustment is done, you tighten the speeder and lock the barrel in place.[10]

Micrometer Depth Gage

Micrometer Depth Gauge

The depth gage, shown in Fig. 22, has a ½-inch movement of the rod, and may be used with rods of any desired length. These have small 45-degree-on-a-side grooves cut into them at intervals of ½ inch. A small spiral spring, marked I, gives the rod a constant downward pressure, so that, when taking a measurement, the base of the tool is placed on the piece of work, and the rod always finds the bottom of the hole; then, by tightening the knurled screw F the rod is clamped in position and the tool may be picked up and its measurement read from the dial. The graduations on this instrument are similar to those of the vernier caliper, only they are much plainer, as a half-inch movement of the rod turns the dial one complete revolution. The figures on the dial denote tenths of an inch, and those on the body of the tool thousandths; each graduation on the dial is therefore equal to 0.010, so that to show the depth of a hole to be 0.373 the dial would be revolved around so that the seventh division beyond the 3 mark would be near to 0, and then by looking from the 0 mark toward the left, the third graduation on the body and one on the dial would be in line, thus denoting 0.373.

The depth gauge, shown in Fig. 22, has a ½-inch movement of the rod and can be used with rods of any length. These rods have small grooves cut into them at ½-inch intervals, each at a 45-degree angle. A small spiral spring, labeled I, applies a constant downward pressure to the rod, ensuring that when you take a measurement, the base of the tool is placed on the workpiece, allowing the rod to reach the bottom of the hole. Then, by tightening the knurled screw F, the rod is secured in place so you can lift the tool and read the measurement from the dial. The markings on this instrument are similar to those on a vernier caliper, but much simpler, as a half-inch movement of the rod makes the dial complete one full turn. The numbers on the dial represent tenths of an inch, while those on the tool body indicate thousandths; each graduation on the dial is equal to 0.010. To show a hole's depth as 0.373, you would turn the dial so that the seventh division past the 3 mark lines up near 0. By looking from the 0 mark to the left, the third graduation on the body and one on the dial will align, indicating 0.373.

Fig. 22. Micrometer Depth Gage

Fig. 22. Micrometer Depth Gage

Fig. 22. Depth Micrometer Gauge

The most essential part of this tool is the threaded screw B, which acts as a rack, and the worm-wheel, solid with the dial C. The upper end of the screw forms a split chuck which grips the measuring rods, while the part marked R is flatted off, and against this portion bears a threaded sleeve G, which acts as a key to keep the screw in position. This sleeve is threaded, both inside and outside, and screws into the body of the tool, while the binding screw F fits into it and binds against a small piece of copper, marked H, which in turn holds the screw in position. The thread on B is 0.245 inch in diameter and is cut with 40 threads per inch. The worm-wheel which meshes into this screw is solid with the dial, as shown at C. It is 0.18 inch in diameter, and requires great accuracy in cutting; it is not hobbed, but the teeth, of which there are twenty, are milled with a circular cutter of the same diameter as the screw B plus 0.002 inch. The little studs, marked EE, on the dial and on the body K, hold the coiled spring in position. Very great accuracy must be attained when locating the holes in K that are to receive the screw and dial B and C. The screw marked J fits into the dial, where it serves as a bearing and also holds the dial in position. The knurled cap D tightens the split chuck in order to hold the measuring rod firmly.[11]

The key part of this tool is the threaded screw B, which functions like a rack, and the worm-wheel, which is integrated with the dial C. The top end of the screw has a split chuck that secures the measuring rods, while the section marked R is flattened, and a threaded sleeve G fits against this area to keep the screw in place. This sleeve has threads both inside and out, and it screws into the body of the tool, while the binding screw F fits into it and presses against a small piece of copper labeled H, which also helps to hold the screw in position. The thread on B measures 0.245 inches in diameter and has 40 threads per inch. The worm-wheel that meshes with this screw is solid with the dial, as shown at C. It has a diameter of 0.18 inches and requires high precision in cutting; it’s not hobbed, but the teeth, totaling twenty, are milled using a circular cutter that matches the diameter of the screw B plus 0.002 inches. The small studs marked EE on the dial and on the body K secure the coiled spring in place. It’s crucial to achieve very high accuracy when positioning the holes in K that will receive the screw and dial B and C. The screw marked J fits into the dial, serving as a bearing and also keeping the dial in position. The knurled cap D tightens the split chuck to hold the measuring rod securely.[11]

Indicator for Accuracy of Lead-screws

Lead-screw Accuracy Indicator

Fig. 23. Indicator for Accuracy of Lead-screws

Fig. 23. Indicator for Accuracy of Lead-screws

Fig. 23. Indicator for Lead-screw Accuracy

All of the tools that have been described require an accurately cut screw, and, as very few lathes are capable of producing this, it may be well to illustrate an indicator for testing the accuracy of the lead-screw, and to explain the method by which it is used. This instrument is shown in Fig. 23, where it is applied to a test screw K. It consists of a body A on one end of which is a projection L serving as the upper bearing for the pivoted lever D. This lever swings about a small steel pivot which can be adjusted by the screw E. The rear end of the lever is forked, and between the prongs is passed a thread making a double turn about the pivot F that carries the pointer J. Any movement of this lever will, therefore, cause this pointer to revolve about the dial C. This dial has 20 divisions, each indicating one-half thousandth of an inch movement of the front end of the lever, so that a total revolution of the pointer about the dial would indicate a movement of the front end of the lever of 0.020 inch. The screws I serve to hold the dial in place on the body of the indicator, while the spring M keeps the pointer normally at the zero mark. The indicator is held in the toolpost by the arm G, which can be set at any angle and firmly clamped by the screw H.

All the tools mentioned require a precisely cut screw, and since very few lathes can achieve this, it’s useful to illustrate a device for checking the accuracy of the lead screw, and to explain how to use it. This instrument is shown in Fig. 23, where it is applied to a test screw K. It consists of a body A, at one end of which there’s a projection L serving as the upper bearing for the pivoted lever D. This lever pivots around a small steel point that can be adjusted using screw E. The back end of the lever is forked, and a thread is passed between the prongs, making a double turn around the pivot F that carries the pointer J. Any movement of this lever will cause the pointer to rotate around the dial C. The dial has 20 divisions, each representing a movement of the front end of the lever by one-half thousandth of an inch, so a full rotation of the pointer around the dial would indicate a movement of the front end of the lever of 0.020 inch. The screws I hold the dial securely in place on the body of the indicator, while the spring M keeps the pointer at the zero mark by default. The indicator is held in the toolpost by the arm G, which can be positioned at any angle and tightly clamped using screw H.

To use the indicator, remove the screw from a micrometer which is known to be accurate, and, with the aid of a brass bushing, chuck it in the lathe so that the thread end will project. Now gear the lathe to cut 40 threads per inch and apply the indicator. When the lathe is started, the point of the indicator follows along in the thread of the micrometer screw, and any variation in the lead will be noted by a movement of the pointer over the dial. If, on the other hand, no movement takes place, it is an indication that the pitch of the lead-screw is correct.[12]

To use the indicator, take the screw out of a micrometer that is known to be accurate, and, with the help of a brass bushing, secure it in the lathe so that the threaded end sticks out. Now set the lathe to cut 40 threads per inch and attach the indicator. When you start the lathe, the tip of the indicator tracks along the threads of the micrometer screw, and any change in the lead will be shown by the pointer moving on the dial. If there’s no movement, it means the pitch of the lead screw is correct.[12]

Micrometer Attachment for Reading Ten-thousandths of an Inch

Micrometer Attachment for Measuring Ten Thousandths of an Inch

Fig. 24. Micrometer with Attachment for Reading Ten-thousandths of an Inch

Fig. 24. Micrometer with Attachment for Reading Ten-thousandths of an Inch

Fig. 24. Micrometer with Attachment for Reading Ten-thousandths of an Inch

Fig. 24 shows an attachment for micrometers designed and made for readings in tenths of thousandths of an inch. With very little fitting it is interchangeable for 1-, 2-, or 3-inch B. & S. micrometers. The idea is simple, as can be seen by the illustration. The diameter of the thimble is increased 3 to 1 by a disk which is graduated with 250 lines instead of 25, making each line represent 0.0001 inch instead of 0.001 inch. A piece of steel is then turned up and bored and cut away so as to form the index blade and a shell to clasp the micrometer frame, the whole thing being made in one piece. The thimble disk being just a good wringing fit, it can be easily adjusted 0 to 0. The attachment can be removed when fine measuring is not required.[13]

Fig. 24 shows an attachment for micrometers designed for readings in tenths of thousandths of an inch. With minimal adjustments, it can be used interchangeably with 1-, 2-, or 3-inch B. & S. micrometers. The concept is straightforward, as illustrated. The diameter of the thimble is increased 3 to 1 by a disk that is marked with 250 lines instead of 25, making each line represent 0.0001 inch rather than 0.001 inch. A piece of steel is then shaped, bored, and cut to create the index blade and a shell that fits around the micrometer frame, all made as a single piece. The thimble disk fits snugly enough to be easily adjusted from 0 to 0. The attachment can be removed when fine measurements aren't necessary.[13]

Special Micrometer for Large Dimensions

Special Micrometer for Large Sizes

Fig. 25 shows a 6-inch micrometer caliper designed for measuring from 0 to 6 inches by half-thousandths. The sliding micrometer head travels on a cylinder barrel through which a hole is accurately bored to suit three plugs, one, two, and three inches long, as shown in the engraving. These plugs serve to locate the traveling head at fixed distances one inch apart. The micrometer screw itself has a travel of one inch, like any standard micrometer. A locknut is used to hold the screw in any desired position. A thumb screw at the end of the barrel bears against the end plug, and zero marks are provided to bring the screw against the plug with the same degree of pressure at each setting. When the head is clamped by means of the locking nut, it is as rigid as though it were solid with the barrel, and the faces of the measuring points are thus always parallel.

Fig. 25 shows a 6-inch micrometer caliper designed for measuring from 0 to 6 inches in increments of half-thousandths. The sliding micrometer head moves along a cylindrical barrel that has a precisely bored hole to accommodate three plugs, which are one, two, and three inches long, as illustrated in the engraving. These plugs help position the moving head at fixed distances of one inch apart. The micrometer screw itself has a travel distance of one inch, just like any standard micrometer. A locknut is used to secure the screw in any desired position. A thumb screw at the end of the barrel presses against the end plug, and zero marks are included to ensure the screw makes contact with the plug with the same level of pressure each time. When the head is clamped using the locking nut, it becomes as solid as if it were fused with the barrel, ensuring that the measuring faces remain parallel.

Fig. 25. Special Micrometer for Large Dimensions

Fig. 25. Special Micrometer for Large Dimensions

Fig. 25. Special Micrometer for Large Sizes

Combination Micrometer

Combination Micrometer

Fig. 26. Combined One- and Two-inch Micrometer

Fig. 26. Combined One- and Two-inch Micrometer

Fig. 26. Combined 1-inch and 2-inch Micrometer

A combined one- and two-inch micrometer is shown in Fig. 26. One side records measurements up to one inch, and the other side up to two inches. A single knurled sleeve or nut serves to move the double-ended measuring piece one way or the other as desired, this piece having a travel of one inch. The spindle is non-rotating, so that the faces of the screw and anvil are always parallel. A locking device holds the screw in any position. This tool is convenient for use both in measuring and as a gage, since it can be conveniently held by the finger ring appearing at the back.

A combined one- and two-inch micrometer is shown in Fig. 26. One side measures up to one inch, and the other side measures up to two inches. A single knurled sleeve or nut lets you move the double-ended measuring piece in either direction as needed, with this piece having a travel of one inch. The spindle doesn’t rotate, making sure that the screw and anvil faces are always parallel. A locking mechanism keeps the screw in any position. This tool is handy for both measuring and gauging since it can be easily held by the finger ring at the back.

Micrometer Stop for the Lathe

Micrometer Stop for the Lathe

Most micrometer lathe stops are limited in their use to work where only a stationary height is required. It is, however, often necessary to use the stop at different heights, to accommodate different lathes; then again, we wish to use it on the right-hand side as well as the left. The form of holder shown in Fig. 27 can be used either right or left, and for various heights, and, by simply taking out the screw A, the micrometer may be removed and used in any other form of holder desired.

Most micrometer lathe stops have limited functionality, typically only working where a fixed height is needed. However, there are times when you need to adjust the stop to different heights to fit various lathes. Additionally, we may want to use it on both the right and left sides. The holder shown in Fig. 27 can be used on either side and adjusted to different heights. Plus, by simply removing screw A, the micrometer can be easily taken out and used in another type of holder as needed.

Fig. 27. Micrometer Stop for the Lathe

Fig. 27. Micrometer Stop for the Lathe

Fig. 27. Micrometer Stop for the Lathe

Both an assembled view and details of the holder are shown in the engraving, so that it can be easily constructed by any one desiring to do so. The micrometer and barrel may be procured from any of the manufacturers of measuring instruments. The swivel C is bored out so that the axis of the micrometer screw will be parallel to the body of the holder when it is in place. The swivel is made of tool steel and is fastened to the holder by the screw A. It is hardened and lapped to a true bearing surface on the sides and bottom, and so adjusted that it will turn to either side and remain in the desired position without moving the screw. The holder B is milled through its entire length with a 90-degree cutter so that it will fit along the ways of the lathe, and the bottom is lapped to a true surface. For a neat appearance, the tool should be color hardened. On top the holder is spotted or countersunk with a drill to form a recess for the C-clamp. A knurled ring D is driven onto the micrometer sleeve so that it can be turned around to bring the graduations uppermost when the position of the barrel is changed.[14]

Both an assembled view and details of the holder are shown in the engraving, making it easy for anyone who wants to construct it. The micrometer and barrel can be bought from any manufacturer of measuring instruments. The swivel C is drilled out so the micrometer screw's axis is parallel to the holder's body when it's in place. The swivel is made of tool steel and is attached to the holder with screw A. It is hardened and smoothed to ensure a true bearing surface on the sides and bottom, and it's adjusted to turn either way while staying in the desired position without moving the screw. The holder B is milled along its entire length with a 90-degree cutter to fit along the lathe's ways, and the bottom is smoothed to a true surface. For a neat look, the tool should be color hardened. On top, the holder is spotted or countersunk with a drill to create a recess for the C-clamp. A knurled ring D is pressed onto the micrometer sleeve so it can be turned to position the graduations on top when the barrel's position is changed.[14]

Micrometer Surface and Height Gage

Micrometer Surface and Height Gauge

Fig. 28. Micrometer Surface and Height Gage

Fig. 28. Micrometer Surface and Height Gage

Fig. 28. Micrometer Surface and Height Gauge

Fig. 28 shows a form of surface gage that has proved very handy, and which can be used also as a height gage for measuring distances from shoulders to the base. If accurately made it is equal, and often preferable, to the vernier or slide caliper now so generally used with an attachment to the sliding jaw. One of its advantages over the vernier is the readiness with which the graduations are discerned, and it is as easy to manipulate as the ordinary micrometer. The part B, which forms the main body of the instrument, is made of tool steel, and one end is fitted into the base where it is held in position by the screw D. The remainder is milled to a thickness of ⅛ inch and has graduations of 0.025 inch for a distance of three inches. The screw A is the most essential part of the tool, and its construction requires great accuracy. Its diameter is ½ inch, and it is cut with 20 threads per inch. In the upper end of the screw is driven the ball H for the sake of giving a neat appearance. The top of the thread is turned off 0.010 inch to allow the scriber F to slide freely on the screw. The barrel I is used for raising and lowering the slide, but instead of having the graduations placed directly upon it, they are made upon the sleeve C, which fits over a shoulder on the barrel. This allows more easy means of adjustment than would be possible were the graduations placed on the barrel itself. The sleeve is graduated with fifty divisions each equaling a movement of the scriber of 0.001 inch. This sleeve may be turned by means of a small spanner wrench so as to bring the zero line into correct position to compensate for wear. A knurled locking nut is also provided for holding the scriber in any fixed position. The scriber itself is hardened and lapped to a finished surface, the tail end being slotted and provided with two screws to compensate for wear. On the scriber is placed the zero mark which shows at a glance the measurement that is being taken. The block K is three inches in height, and by using this block and placing the gage on its top, the range of the gage is increased to six inches. The screw E is used for fastening the gage to the top of the block. The center of the block is drilled out and slots cut through the sides in order to make it light and neat in appearance.[15]

Fig. 28 shows a type of surface gauge that has proven very useful and can also be used as a height gauge for measuring distances from shoulders to the base. If made accurately, it is equal to—and often preferable to—the vernier or slide caliper that is commonly used with an attachment to the sliding jaw. One of its advantages over the vernier is how easily the graduations can be seen, and it’s just as easy to use as the regular micrometer. The part B, which is the main body of the instrument, is made of tool steel, and one end is fitted into the base where it’s held in place by screw D. The rest is milled to a thickness of ⅛ inch and has graduations of 0.025 inch over a three-inch distance. The screw A is the most critical part of the tool, and it requires great precision to manufacture. Its diameter is ½ inch, and it has 20 threads per inch. A ball H is inserted at the top end of the screw for a polished look. The top of the thread is turned down by 0.010 inch to allow the scriber F to move freely on the screw. The barrel I is used for raising and lowering the slide, but instead of placing the graduations directly on it, they are made on the sleeve C, which fits over a shoulder on the barrel. This method allows for easier adjustments than if the graduations were on the barrel itself. The sleeve is marked with fifty divisions, each representing 0.001 inch of scriber movement. This sleeve can be turned using a small spanner wrench to align the zero line properly, compensating for wear. A knurled locking nut is also provided to secure the scriber in a fixed position. The scriber itself is hardened and polished to a smooth finish, with the tail end slotted and equipped with two screws to adjust for wear. A zero mark is placed on the scriber to easily indicate the measurement being taken. The block K is three inches high, and by placing the gauge on its top, the range of the gauge is extended to six inches. The screw E is used to secure the gauge to the top of the block. The center of the block is hollowed out and slots are cut through the sides to keep it light and neat in appearance.[15]

Micrometer of from One- to Five-inch Capacity

Micrometer with a Capacity of One to Five Inches

Fig. 29. Micrometer of from One- to Five-inch Capacity

Fig. 29. Micrometer of from One- to Five-inch Capacity

Fig. 29. Micrometer with One to Five-Inch Capacity

Fig. 29 shows a very simple and light five-inch micrometer that can be quickly set to exact position from one to five inches. The round beam is graduated by a series of angular grooves, 1 inch apart, which are of such a form and depth that the clamping fingers at the end of part A spring in, allowing one inch adjustment of the beam to be quickly and positively made. The sleeve K is of tool steel, being counterbored from the forward end for all but one-half inch of its length. For this half inch it is threaded on the inside and acts as a micrometer nut. The outside of the same end is threaded to receive the adjusting nut F, and two slots are cut in the sleeve, at 90 degrees with the graduations. These slots, by a movement of the nut F, provide a means for compensating for wear. The bushing E is hardened and lapped, and fitted tightly in the forward counterbore of this sleeve, where it acts as a guide for the front end of the micrometer screw. The barrel J is the same as that of a regular micrometer, and is graduated in 0.025 inch divisions.

Fig. 29 shows a very simple and lightweight five-inch micrometer that can be quickly adjusted to the exact position between one and five inches. The round beam has a series of angular grooves spaced one inch apart, designed in such a way that the clamping fingers at the end of part A spring in, allowing for easy and precise one-inch adjustments of the beam. The sleeve K is made of tool steel and is counterbored from the front end for nearly its entire length, except for the last half inch, which is threaded on the inside and functions as a micrometer nut. The outside of that end is also threaded to accommodate the adjusting nut F, and there are two slots cut into the sleeve at 90 degrees to the graduations. These slots allow for compensation for wear by adjusting nut F. The bushing E is hardened and lapped, fitting tightly into the front counterbore of the sleeve, where it serves as a guide for the front end of the micrometer screw. The barrel J is identical to that of a standard micrometer and is marked in 0.025 inch increments.

The most essential part of the tool is the threaded screw I, over the end of which fits the barrel J. The end is tapped out to receive the speeder H, which serves to hold the barrel in position. The thread is 5/16 inch in diameter, with 40 threads per inch, while the unthreaded part is hardened, ground and lapped. To adjust the instrument, loosen the speeder H and turn the barrel until the proper adjustment is obtained; lock the barrel by again tightening the speeder. The beam C has a ¼-inch hole drilled throughout its entire length in order to make it light. Small 90-degree grooves are cut into it at intervals of 1 inch, and a ⅛-inch slot is milled through one side to within 1¼ inch of the forward end. The back end of part A forms a spring-tempered split chuck, which grips the beam and holds A in position, while the exterior is threaded to receive the knurled cap B by which the chuck is tightened firmly to the beam. From the front end, toward the split chuck, the body is counterbored ⅝ inch and the bushing D driven in tight. This bushing has a key G fitted into it, which slides in the slot of the beam and prevents the arm from turning. The projecting arm is bored and tapped to receive the sleeve K. This gage must be carefully and accurately made to be of value.[16]

The main component of the tool is the threaded screw I, which the barrel J fits over. The end is drilled out to accommodate the speeder H, which keeps the barrel in place. The thread is 5/16 inch in diameter with 40 threads per inch, while the unthreaded section is hardened, ground, and lapped. To adjust the instrument, loosen the speeder H and turn the barrel until you achieve the right adjustment; then lock the barrel by tightening the speeder again. The beam C features a ¼-inch hole that runs the entire length for reduced weight. Small 90-degree grooves are cut into it at 1-inch intervals, and a ⅛-inch slot is milled through one side, stopping 1¼ inch from the front end. The back end of part A has a spring-tempered split chuck that grips the beam and secures A in position, while the outside is threaded to accept the knurled cap B, which tightens the chuck to the beam. From the front toward the split chuck, the body is counterbored ⅝ inch, and the bushing D is pressed in tightly. This bushing includes a key G that slides into the slot of the beam, preventing the arm from rotating. The extending arm is drilled and tapped to hold the sleeve K. This gauge must be made carefully and accurately to be useful.[16]

Inside Micrometer for Setting Calipers

Inside Micrometer for Setting Calipers

Fig. 30. Method of Setting Calipers from Inside Micrometers

Fig. 30. Method of Setting Calipers from Inside Micrometers

Fig. 30. How to Set Calipers Using Inside Micrometers

Fig. 30 shows an application of inside micrometers which is very handy. The hole for the scriber in the scriber clamp of a surface gage is reamed out to fit the rods used with inside micrometers. This forms a convenient holder for the micrometer when used for setting outside calipers to it. The calipers can be set easily and accurately at the same time, and where extreme accuracy is not necessary this arrangement is more handy than that of using large-sized micrometers.

Fig. 30 shows a useful application of inside micrometers. The hole for the scriber in the scriber clamp of a surface gauge is enlarged to fit the rods used with inside micrometers. This creates a convenient holder for the micrometer when setting outside calipers to it. The calipers can be adjusted easily and accurately at the same time, and when extreme precision isn't required, this setup is more practical than using larger micrometers.

With care and practice an accuracy of within one-quarter of 0.001 inch is obtainable in this way. Mistakes, in fact, are more easily guarded against than is the case when using the micrometers directly.

With careful practice, an accuracy of within one-quarter of 0.001 inch can be achieved this way. In fact, it's easier to avoid mistakes compared to when using micrometers directly.

Micrometer Frame

Micrometer Holder

Fig. 31. Useful and Handy Micrometer Frame

Fig. 31. Useful and Handy Micrometer Frame

Fig. 31. Useful and Handy Micrometer Frame

Fig. 31 shows a micrometer frame used some years ago at the Westinghouse works. The frame is an aluminum casting, and the anvil is simply a tool-steel pin, which fits well in the hole into which it is inserted, and can be clamped anywhere within the limits of its length. The micrometer end of the frame is supplied with an inside micrometer head. The tool is adjusted to a gage, either to a standard pin gage, or to an inside micrometer gage. The capacities of three of these micrometers in a set may be from about 3½ to 7 inches, 6 to 11 inches, and 10 to 15 inches. When the head is turned outward, as shown in the lower view in the cut, the tool is very handy around a horizontal boring machine where a pin gage cannot be used without removing the boring bar.

Fig. 31 shows a micrometer frame used a few years ago at the Westinghouse factory. The frame is made from aluminum, and the anvil is just a tool-steel pin that fits well into the hole where it’s inserted and can be clamped anywhere along its length. The micrometer end of the frame has an inside micrometer head. The tool is calibrated to a gauge, either a standard pin gauge or an inside micrometer gauge. The capacities of three of these micrometers in a set range from about 3½ to 7 inches, 6 to 11 inches, and 10 to 15 inches. When the head is turned outward, as shown in the lower view in the image, the tool is very convenient around a horizontal boring machine where a pin gauge can't be used without taking off the boring bar.

Micrometer Stop for the Lathe

Micrometer Stop for the Lathe

Fig. 32. Micrometer Stop for the Lathe

Fig. 32. Micrometer Stop for the Lathe

Fig. 32. Micrometer Stop for the Lathe

The simple micrometer stop shown in Fig. 32 is used on the engine lathe for obtaining accurate movements of the lathe carriage. It consists of a micrometer head, which can be purchased from any micrometer manufacturer, and a machine steel body which is bored to fit the micrometer head. This tool is clamped on the front way of the lathe bed, and when the jaw of the micrometer is against the lathe carriage, it can easily be adjusted to a thousandth of an inch. Of course, care should be taken not to bump the carriage against the micrometer.[17]

The simple micrometer stop shown in Fig. 32 is used on the engine lathe to achieve precise movements of the lathe carriage. It consists of a micrometer head, which can be bought from any micrometer manufacturer, and a machine steel body that is drilled to fit the micrometer head. This tool is secured to the front way of the lathe bed, and when the micrometer's jaw is pressed against the lathe carriage, it can be easily adjusted to a thousandth of an inch. Naturally, care should be taken not to hit the carriage against the micrometer.[17]

Use of Micrometer for Internal Thread Cutting

Using a Micrometer for Cutting Internal Threads

Fig. 33. Method of using Micrometer for Internal Thread Cutting

Fig. 33. Method of using Micrometer for Internal Thread Cutting

Fig. 33. How to Use a Micrometer for Cutting Internal Threads

Fig. 33 illustrates a means of determining the size of internally threaded work. The work shown is intended for a lathe chuck. The outside diameter of the hub on the work is turned to the same size as the hubs on small faceplates which are furnished with all new lathes. The threaded size is then taken and transferred with a micrometer, over the anvil of which is fitted a 60-degree point as shown enlarged at A. In connection with a graduated cross-feed screw this greatly facilitates the work over the usual cut-and-try method.[18]

Fig. 33 shows a way to determine the size of internally threaded pieces. The piece illustrated is meant for a lathe chuck. The outer diameter of the hub on the piece is turned to match the hubs on small faceplates that come with all new lathes. The threaded size is then measured and transferred using a micrometer, which has a 60-degree point fitted over the anvil as shown enlarged at A. When paired with a graduated cross-feed screw, this makes the work much easier compared to the usual trial-and-error method.[18]

Inside Micrometer

Internal Micrometer

The inside micrometer shown in sections in Figs. 34 and 35 is adapted to measuring, by use of extension rods, from 2 inches up to any size of hole, and has one inch adjustment of the measuring screw.

The inside micrometer shown in the sections of Figs. 34 and 35 is designed to measure, using extension rods, from 2 inches up to any size of hole, and features a one-inch adjustment on the measuring screw.

Figs. 34 and 35. Section of Inside Micrometer

Figs. 34 and 35. Section of Inside Micrometer

Figs. 34 and 35. Section of Inside Micrometer

Referring to the section shown in Fig. 35, the measuring screw S is secured to the thimble B with the screw D, the head of which is hardened and forms the anvil. By loosening this screw D, the thimble can be rotated to compensate for wear. The wear of the measuring screw and nut is taken up by screwing the bushing A into the frame with the wrench shown in Fig. 37. This bushing is split in three sections for about two-thirds of its length on the threaded end. The three small lugs on the wrench fit into these slots. The handle end of the wrench is a screw driver which is used for manipulating the set screw C. The bushing is made an easy fit in the frame on its plain end and tapered, as shown, on its outside threaded part. This thread being the same pitch as the measuring screw, adjustment for wear does not affect the reading of the micrometer. This manner of adjustment brings the nut squarely down on the measuring screw for its whole length, presenting the same amount of wearing surface after adjustment as when new.

Referring to the section shown in Fig. 35, the measuring screw S is attached to the thimble B with the screw D, which has a hardened head that acts as the anvil. By loosening this screw D, the thimble can be rotated to account for wear. The wear of the measuring screw and nut is corrected by screwing the bushing A into the frame using the wrench shown in Fig. 37. This bushing is split into three sections for about two-thirds of its length on the threaded end. The three small lugs on the wrench fit into these slots. The handle end of the wrench is a screwdriver used for adjusting the set screw C. The bushing fits easily into the frame at its plain end and is tapered, as shown, on its outer threaded part. This thread matches the pitch of the measuring screw, so adjusting for wear does not affect the micrometer reading. This adjustment method ensures the nut sits squarely down on the measuring screw along its entire length, providing the same amount of wear surface after adjustment as it had when new.

Fig. 36. Handle for Inside Micrometer

Fig. 36. Handle for Inside Micrometer

Fig. 36. Handle for Inside Micrometer

Fig. 37. Wrench used with Inside Micrometer

Fig. 37. Wrench used with Inside Micrometer

Fig. 37. Wrench used with Inside Micrometer

The point F, which is hardened on its outer end, screws into the frame, and is secured by the taper-headed screw O, which screws into and expands the split and threaded end of the point F. The handle, Fig. 36, clamps over the knurled part of the frame for use in small, deep holes. The rods, six in number, running from 1 to 6 inches inclusive, are made by screwing a sleeve onto a rod with a hardened point and locking it with a taper-headed screw on its threaded and split end, the same as in the point F. The extension pieces, Fig. 38, are adjustable, on their socketed ends, in the same way, and run in lengths of 6, 12, 18 inches, etc.[19]

The point F, which is hardened at the outer end, screws into the frame and is secured by the taper-headed screw O, which screws into and expands the split and threaded end of the point F. The handle, Fig. 36, clamps over the knurled part of the frame for use in small, deep holes. The rods, six in total, ranging from 1 to 6 inches, are made by screwing a sleeve onto a rod with a hardened point and locking it with a taper-headed screw on its threaded and split end, just like in the point F. The extension pieces, Fig. 38, are adjustable at their socketed ends in the same manner, and come in lengths of 6, 12, 18 inches, etc. [19]

Fig. 38. Adjustable Extension Pieces for Inside Micrometer

Fig. 38. Adjustable Extension Pieces for Inside Micrometer

Fig. 38. Adjustable Extension Pieces for Inside Micrometer

Direct Fractional-reading Micrometer

Direct Fractional Reading Micrometer

Fig. 39. Direct Fractional-reading Micrometer

Fig. 39. Direct Fractional-reading Micrometer

Fig. 39. Direct Fractional-reading Micrometer

The direct fractional-reading micrometer shown in Fig. 39 is the result of talks with many mechanics in which all agreed that such a feature added to a micrometer would, by making it both a fractional and decimal gage, more than double its practical value. While approximate readings in 64ths, etc., may be obtained by the graduations on the barrel B as on an ordinary inch scale, the exact readings of 64th, etc., may be obtained only by reference to graduations on the movable thimble A. There are but eight places on A which coincide with the long graduation line on B when any 64th, 32d, 16th, or 8th is being measured, and each of these eight places is marked with a line, and the 64th, 32d, 16th, or 8th for which that line should be used is marked thereon. (See a and b, Fig. 40.) The line a would be used for 3/32, 7/32, 11/32, etc., and the line b for 1/64, 9/64, 17/64, etc. Now suppose we wish to accurately measure 15/32 inch. We first roughly read it off the inch scale on sleeve B by turning out thimble A. Having secured it closely by drawing edge of A over that graduation, we find that the line a (Fig. 40) on the movable thimble very nearly or exactly coincides with the long graduation line on B. When these lines coincide, we have the exact measurement of 15/32 inch without reference to how many thousandths may be contained in the fraction. Thus all through the scale any fraction may be found instantly. There is no mental arithmetic, use of tables, or memory work in using the tool. The new graduations are independent of the old, and may be used equally well with or without them.

The direct fractional-reading micrometer shown in Fig. 39 is the result of discussions with numerous mechanics, all of whom agreed that adding this feature to a micrometer would make it both a fractional and decimal gauge, significantly increasing its practical value. While you can get approximate readings in 64ths, etc., using the graduations on the barrel B just like on a regular inch scale, the exact readings of 64th, etc., can only be achieved by looking at the graduations on the movable thimble A. There are only eight positions on A that line up with the long graduation line on B when measuring any 64th, 32nd, 16th, or 8th, and each of these eight positions is marked with a line that indicates which 64th, 32nd, 16th, or 8th it corresponds to. (See a and b, Fig. 40.) The line a is used for 3/32, 7/32, 11/32, and so on, while the line b is for 1/64, 9/64, 17/64, etc. Now let’s say we want to accurately measure 15/32 inch. We first get an approximate reading off the inch scale on sleeve B by turning out thimble A. Once we secure it closely by aligning the edge of A with that graduation, we find that line a (Fig. 40) on the movable thimble very closely or exactly lines up with the long graduation line on B. When these lines align, we have the precise measurement of 15/32 inch without having to worry about how many thousandths are in the fraction. Thus, any fraction can be quickly found anywhere on the scale. There’s no mental math, use of tables, or remembering needed when using the tool. The new graduations are separate from the old ones and can be used just as effectively with or without them.

Fig. 40. Graduations on the Fractional-reading Micrometer

Fig. 40. Graduations on the Fractional-reading Micrometer

Fig. 40. Markings on the Fractional-Reading Micrometer

Micrometers may also be graduated as in Fig. 41. Instead of using the zero line on A as a base line, a point is taken one-fifth of a turn around A, and the graduated scale on B is placed to correspond, as shown in the engraving; also, instead of making lines a, b, etc., on A, full length, they are made about half an inch long, and the numerators are entirely omitted and the denominators placed at the end instead of under the line. To the ordinary user of the tool, this is all that is necessary for a perfectly clear reading of the fractions.[20]

Micrometers can also be calibrated as shown in Fig. 41. Instead of using the zero line on A as a reference point, a point is selected one-fifth of a turn around A, and the graduated scale on B is aligned accordingly, as illustrated in the engraving. Additionally, instead of making the lines a, b, etc., on A, full length, they are made about half an inch long, with the numerators completely left out and the denominators placed at the end instead of beneath the line. For the typical user of the tool, this provides everything needed for a clear reading of the fractions.[20]

Fig. 41. Another Method of Graduating for Fractional Reading

Fig. 41. Another Method of Graduating for Fractional Reading

Fig. 41. Another Way to Measure for Fractional Reading

Sensitive Attachment for Measuring Instruments

Sensitive Attachment for Measuring Tools

No matter how finely and accurately micrometers and verniers may be made, dependence must in all cases be placed on the sensitiveness of a man's hand to obtain the exact dimensions of the piece to be measured. In order to overcome this difficulty and eliminate the personal equation in the manufacture of duplicate and interchangeable parts, the sensitive attachment to the micrometer shown in Fig. 42 may be used, and will be found of much value.

No matter how well-made micrometers and verniers are, we still rely on the sensitivity of a person's hand to get the exact measurements of the item being measured. To address this issue and remove personal bias in producing duplicate and interchangeable parts, the sensitive attachment to the micrometer shown in Fig. 42 can be used and will prove to be very helpful.

Fig. 42. Sensitive Micrometer Attachment

Fig. 42. Sensitive Micrometer Attachment

Fig. 42. Smart Micrometer Attachment

The auxiliary barrel A is held to the anvil of the micrometer by means of a thumb screw B. At the inside end of the barrel is a secondary anvil C, the base of which bears against the short arm of the indicating lever D. The action will be clearly seen by reference to the engraving. The micrometer is so set that when a gage, G, of exact size, is placed between the measuring points, the long arm of the indicator stands at the 0 mark. If the pieces being calipered vary in the least from the standard size it will be readily noted by the movement of the pointer. Hard rubber shapes turned from rough casting often vary from 0.003 to 0.005 inch after having passed the inspector's test with an ordinary micrometer. With this attachment the inspector's helper can detect very minute variations from the limit size. Anything within the limits of the micrometer can be made to show to the naked eye variations as small as a ten-thousandth inch.[21]

The auxiliary barrel A is attached to the micrometer's anvil using a thumb screw B. At the inner end of the barrel is a secondary anvil C, the base of which presses against the short arm of the indicating lever D. You can clearly see the action by looking at the engraving. The micrometer is calibrated so that when a gauge G of the exact size is placed between the measuring points, the long arm of the indicator is at the 0 mark. If the pieces being measured differ in any way from the standard size, it will be easily noticed by the movement of the pointer. Hard rubber shapes turned from rough castings often vary from 0.003 to 0.005 inch even after passing the inspector's test with a standard micrometer. With this attachment, the inspector's assistant can detect very small variations from the limit size. Any difference within the micrometer's range can be visually detected as precise as a ten-thousandth of an inch.[21]

Another Sensitive Micrometer Attachment

Another Sensitive Micrometer Add-On

Fig. 43. Another Sensitive Micrometer Attachment

Fig. 43. Another Sensitive Micrometer Attachment

Fig. 43. Another Sensitive Micrometer Attachment

When testing the diameters of pieces that are handled in great quantities and are all supposed to be within certain close limits of a standard dimension, the ordinary micrometer presents the difficulty of having to be moved for each piece, and small variations in diameters have to be carefully read off from the graduations on the barrel. Not only does this take a comparatively long time, but it also easily happens that the differences from the standard diameter are not carefully noted, and pieces are liable to pass inspection that would not pass if a convenient arrangement for reading off the differences were at hand. Fig. 43 shows a regular Brown & Sharpe micrometer fitted with a sensitive arrangement for testing and inspecting the diameters of pieces which must be within certain close limits of variation. The addition to the ordinary micrometer is all at the anvil end of the instrument. The anvil itself is loose and consists of a plunger B, held in place by a small pin A. The pin has freedom to move in a slot in the micrometer body, as shown in the enlarged view in the cut. A spring C holds the plunger B up against the work to be measured, and a screw D is provided for obtaining the proper tension in the spring. The screw and the spring are contained in an extension E screwed and doweled to the body of the micrometer. A pointer or indicator is provided which is pivoted at F and has one extensional arm resting against the pin A, which is pointed in order to secure a line contact. At the end of the indicator a small scale is graduated with the zero mark in the center, and as the indicator swings to one side or the other the variations in the size of the piece measured are easily determined. A small spring G is provided for holding the pointer up against the pin A. The case H simply serves the purpose of protecting the spring mentioned. As the plunger B takes up more space than the regular anvil, the readings of the micrometer cannot be direct. The plunger B can be made of such dimensions, however, that 0.100 inch deducted from the barrel and thimble reading will give the actual dimension. Such a deduction is easily done in all cases. In other words, the reading of the micrometer should be 0.100 when the face of the measuring screw is in contact with the face of the plunger; the 0.100 inch mark is thus the zero line of this measuring tool.

When measuring the diameters of parts that are processed in large quantities and need to be within specific tight limits of a standard size, a standard micrometer poses the challenge of needing to be repositioned for each piece. Small variations in diameters must be accurately read from the markings on the barrel. Not only does this take a considerable amount of time, but it can also lead to overlooking differences from the standard diameter, allowing pieces to pass inspection that wouldn’t if there were a more convenient method for measuring differences. Fig. 43 displays a standard Brown & Sharpe micrometer equipped with a precise setup for measuring and inspecting the diameters of parts that must stay within certain tight limits of variation. The enhancement to the regular micrometer is located entirely at the anvil end of the tool. The anvil itself is movable and consists of a plunger B, secured by a small pin A. The pin can slide within a slot in the micrometer body, as shown in the enlarged view in the illustration. A spring C keeps the plunger B pressed against the component being measured, and a screw D is available to adjust the right tension in the spring. The screw and spring are housed in an extension E that is screwed and doweled to the micrometer body. A pointer or indicator is included, pivoted at F, with an arm resting against the pin A, which has a pointed end for making line contact. At the end of the indicator, there’s a small scale marked with the zero point in the center, allowing easy identification of size variations as the indicator moves side to side. A small spring G is included to keep the pointer pressed against the pin A. The case H is simply there to protect the previously mentioned spring. Since the plunger B occupies more space than the standard anvil, the micrometer readings cannot be taken directly. However, the plunger B can be sized so that deducting 0.100 inch from the barrel and thimble readings will reflect the actual dimension. This deduction can be easily applied in all situations. In other words, the micrometer reading should be 0.100 when the measuring screw’s face touches the plunger’s face; the 0.100 inch mark represents the zero line of this measuring device.

When desiring to measure a number of pieces, a standard size piece or gage is placed between the plunger B and the face L of the micrometer screw, and the instrument is adjusted until the indicator points exactly to zero on the small scale provided on the body of the micrometer. After this the micrometer is locked, and the pieces to be measured are pushed one after another between the face L and the plunger B, the indications of the pointer M being meanwhile observed. Whenever the pointer shows too great a difference, the piece, of course, does not pass inspection. All deviations are easily detected, and any person of ordinary common sense can be employed for inspecting the work.

When you want to measure several pieces, you place a standard-sized piece or gage between the plunger B and the face L of the micrometer screw. Then, adjust the instrument until the indicator points exactly to zero on the small scale on the body of the micrometer. After that, lock the micrometer, and push each piece one by one between the face L and the plunger B, while observing the readings on the pointer M. If the pointer shows too much of a difference, the piece fails inspection. Any deviations are easy to spot, so anyone with basic common sense can be tasked with inspecting the work.

Micrometer Scale

Micrometer Scale

Fig. 44. Micrometer Mounted on Machinist's Scale

Fig. 44. Micrometer Mounted on Machinist's Scale

Fig. 44. Micrometer Mounted on Machinist's Scale

A micrometer, mounted as shown in Fig. 44 is very handy. The micrometer may be used in combination with a 4-, 6-, 9-, or 12-inch scale. It can be adjusted on standard plugs, or one can make a set of gages up to 12 inches, out of 3/16-inch round tool steel wire, and use these for setting. In mounting the micrometer, before cutting it apart, mill the shoulders shown at A, and in milling the bottom pieces B, use a piece of machine steel long enough for both, cutting the piece in half after milling the slots. In this way one obtains perfect alignment. In a shop where a set of large micrometers is not kept, this arrangement is very useful.[22]

A micrometer, set up as shown in Fig. 44, is really useful. You can use the micrometer with a 4-, 6-, 9-, or 12-inch scale. It can be adjusted on standard plugs, or you can make a set of gages up to 12 inches using 3/16-inch round tool steel wire, and use these for calibration. When setting up the micrometer, before cutting it apart, mill the shoulders shown at A, and when milling the bottom pieces B, use a piece of machine steel that's long enough for both, cutting it in half after milling the slots. This way, you get perfect alignment. In a workshop where a set of large micrometers isn't available, this setup is very helpful.[22]


CHAPTER IV

CHAPTER 4

MISCELLANEOUS MEASURING TOOLS AND GAGES

Miscellaneous Measurement Tools and Gauges

Among the miscellaneous measuring tools and gages dealt with in this chapter are tools and gages for measuring and comparing tapers, adjustable gages, radius gages, gages for grinding drills, sensitive gages, tools for gaging taper threaded holes, contour gages, etc. Of course, these are offered merely as examples of what can be done in the line of measuring tools for different purposes, and, while having a distinct and direct value to the mechanic, they also have a great indirect value, because they furnish suggestions for the designing and making of tools for similar purposes.

Among the various measuring tools and gauges discussed in this chapter are tools and gauges for measuring and comparing tapers, adjustable gauges, radius gauges, gauges for grinding drills, sensitive gauges, tools for gauging taper threaded holes, contour gauges, and more. These are just examples of what's possible with measuring tools for different uses. While they have clear and direct value for mechanics, they also hold significant indirect value, as they provide ideas for designing and creating tools for similar purposes.

Tool for Measuring Tapers

Tool for Measuring Tapers

Fig. 45. Taper Measuring Tool

Fig. 45. Taper Measuring Tool

Fig. 45. Taper Measurement Tool

Fig. 45 shows a tool which has proved very useful. It is a tool for measuring tapers on dowel pins, reamers, drill shanks, or anything to be tapered. Most machinists know that to find the taper of a shank they must use their calipers for one end and reset them for the other end; or else caliper two places, say, three inches apart, and if, for instance, the difference should be 1/16 inch, they must multiply this difference by four to get the taper per foot. With the tool above mentioned, all this trouble in calipering and figuring is saved. Simply place the shank or reamer to be measured between pins A, B, C, and D, and slide H and K together. Then the taper can be read at once on the graduated scale at L. The construction of the tool will be readily understood. The body or base F has a cross piece supporting the two pins A and B. On this slides piece K, which has at its right end the graduated segment. The screw G is fast to piece K, and upon it swivels the pointer E, which carries the two pins C and D. Thus these two pins can be brought into contact with a tapered piece of any diameter within the capacity of the tool, and the swivel screw G allows the pins to adjust themselves to the taper of the work and the pointer E to move to the left or right, showing instantly the taper per foot.

Fig. 45 shows a tool that has proven to be very helpful. It’s designed for measuring tapers on dowel pins, reamers, drill shanks, or anything that needs to be tapered. Most machinists know that to determine the taper of a shank, they have to use their calipers on one end and reset them for the other end; or they can measure two points, say, three inches apart, and if, for example, the difference is 1/16 inch, they have to multiply that difference by four to find the taper per foot. With the tool mentioned above, all this hassle of measuring and calculating is eliminated. You just place the shank or reamer to be measured between pins A, B, C, and D, and slide H and K together. Then the taper can be read directly on the graduated scale at L. The design of the tool is easy to understand. The base F has a cross piece that supports the two pins A and B. On this slides piece K, which has the graduated segment at its right end. The screw G is attached to piece K, and the pointer E, which holds the two pins C and D, swivels on it. This way, the two pins can be adjusted to touch a tapered piece of any diameter within the tool's capacity, and the swivel screw G allows the pins to adapt to the taper of the work while the pointer E moves left or right, immediately indicating the taper per foot.

As the pins A and B are 1½ inch apart, which is ⅛ of a foot, and the distance from G to L is 4½ inches, which is three times longer than the distance between A and B, the graduations should be 3/64 inch apart, in order to indicate the taper per foot in eighths of an inch.[23]

As the pins A and B are 1½ inches apart, which is ⅛ of a foot, and the distance from G to L is 4½ inches, which is three times longer than the distance between A and B, the graduations should be 3/64 inch apart to show the taper per foot in eighths of an inch.[23]

Taper Gage

Taper Gauge

Fig. 46. Handy Taper Gage

Fig. 46. Handy Taper Gage

Fig. 46. Handy Tape Gauge

A handy taper gage is shown in Fig. 46. The blades of the gage are made of tool steel. The edge of the blade A is V-shaped, and the blade B has a V-groove to correspond. The end of B is offset so as to make the joint and allow the two blades to be in the same plane. A strong screw and nut are provided to hold the blades at any setting. The user of this gage looks under the edge of A, and is thereby enabled to tell whether the taper coincides with that set by the gage, and also where a taper piece needs touching up to make it true.[24]

A handy taper gauge is shown in Fig. 46. The blades of the gauge are made of tool steel. The edge of the blade A is V-shaped, and blade B has a V-groove to match. The end of B is offset to create a joint and allow both blades to lie in the same plane. A sturdy screw and nut are used to secure the blades at any setting. The user of this gauge looks under the edge of A, allowing them to see if the taper matches the setting on the gauge, and also where a tapered piece needs adjustments to make it accurate.[24]

Test Gage for Maintaining Standard Tapers

Test Gauge for Maintaining Standard Tapers

Fig. 47. Test Gage for Maintaining Standard Tapers

Fig. 47. Test Gage for Maintaining Standard Tapers

Fig. 47. Test Gauge for Keeping Standard Tapers

In steam injector work, accurately ground reamers of unusual tapers are commonly required, and the gage shown in Fig. 47 was designed to maintain the prevailing standard. It consists of a graduated bar, 1 inch square, with the slot F running its entire length. The stationary head A is secured in position flush with the end of the bar, and the sliding head B is fitted with a tongue which guides it in the slot. This head may be secured in any desired position by means of a knurled thumb nut. The bushings D and D′ are made of tool steel, hardened and ground to a knife edge on the inside flush with the face. All bushings are made interchangeable as to outside diameter.

In steam injector work, accurately ground reamers with unique tapers are often needed, and the gauge shown in Fig. 47 was designed to uphold the current standard. It consists of a graduated bar, 1 inch square, with the slot F extending the full length. The stationary head A is fixed in place, level with the end of the bar, while the sliding head B has a tongue that guides it in the slot. This head can be locked in any desired position using a knurled thumb nut. The bushings D and D′ are made of tool steel, hardened and ground to a knife edge on the inside flush with the face. All bushings are designed to be interchangeable regarding their outside diameter.

The head B is fitted with an indicating edge E which is set flush with the knife edge of the bushing. The reading indicates to 0.010 inch the distance the bushings are from each other, and the difference in their diameter being known, it is easy to compute the taper. With this gage it is possible to maintain the standard tapers perfectly correct, each reamer being marked with the reading as shown by the scale.[25]

The head B has an indicator edge E that is flush with the knife edge of the bushing. The reading shows to 0.010 inch the distance between the bushings, and knowing the difference in their diameter makes it easy to calculate the taper. With this gauge, it's possible to keep the standard tapers perfectly accurate, with each reamer marked according to the reading indicated by the scale.[25]

Inside and Outside Adjustable Gages

Inside and Outside Adjustable Gauges

Fig. 48. Adjustable Gage for Inside and Outside Measurements

Fig. 48. Adjustable Gage for Inside and Outside Measurements

Fig. 48. Adjustable Gauge for Inside and Outside Measurements

Fig. 48 shows an inside and an outside adjustable gage for accurate work, used in laying out drill jigs, and in setting tools on lathes, shapers, planers, and milling machines. The outside gage is shown in the side view and in the sectional end view marked Y. At X in the same figure is a sectional end view showing how the gage is constructed for inside work. The top and bottom edges are rounded, so that the diameters of holes may be easily measured.

Fig. 48 displays an inside and outside adjustable gauge for precision work, used for setting up drill jigs and adjusting tools on lathes, shapers, planers, and milling machines. The outside gauge is depicted in the side view and in the sectional end view labeled Y. At X in the same figure is a sectional end view illustrating how the gauge is designed for inside work. The top and bottom edges are rounded, allowing for easy measurement of hole diameters.

The gage consists of a stepped block B, mounted so as to slide upon the inclined edge of the block C. There are V-ways upon the upper edge of the latter, and the block B is split and arranged to clamp over the ways by the screw shown at S. All parts of the gage are hardened and the faces of the steps marked A, are ground and finished so that at any position of the slide they are parallel to the base of the block C. The lower split portion of the block is spring-tempered to prevent breaking under the action of the screw, and also to cause it to spring open when loosened. The gage has the advantage that it can be quickly adjusted to any size within its limits, which does away with using blocks. In planing a piece to a given thickness, the gage may be set to that height with great accuracy by means of a micrometer caliper, and then the planer or shaper tool adjusted down to the gage. This method does away with the "cut-and-try" process, and will bring the finishing cut within 0.001 inch of the required size. If the piece being planed, or the opening to be measured, is larger than the extreme limit of the gage, parallels may be used. In fitting bushings into bushing holes, the adjustable gage may be moved out to fit the hole, and then, when the bushing is finished to the diameter given by the gage, as determined by a micrometer caliper, a driving fit is ensured.[26]

The gauge consists of a stepped block B, designed to slide along the angled edge of block C. There are V-shaped grooves on the upper edge of block C, and block B is split and designed to clamp over the grooves using the screw shown at S. All parts of the gauge are hardened, and the surfaces of the steps marked A are ground and finished so that they remain parallel to the base of block C at any position of the slide. The lower split part of the block is spring-tempered to avoid breaking under the screw's pressure and to make it spring open when loosened. The gauge has the benefit of being quickly adjustable to any size within its range, eliminating the need for using blocks. When planing a piece to a specific thickness, the gauge can be set to that height very accurately using a micrometer caliper, and then the planer or shaper tool can be adjusted down to the gauge. This method eliminates the "cut-and-try" approach and can bring the finishing cut within 0.001 inch of the desired size. If the piece being planed or the opening to be measured is larger than the maximum limit of the gauge, parallels can be used. When fitting bushings into bushing holes, the adjustable gauge can be moved out to fit the hole, and then, once the bushing is finished to the diameter specified by the gauge, as measured by a micrometer caliper, a tight fit is guaranteed. [26]

Radius Gage

Radius Gauge

Fig. 49. Radius Gage

Fig. 49. Radius Gage

Fig. 49. Radius Gauge

Fig. 49 shows a radius gage which has proved to be very handy for all such work as rounding corners or grinding tools to a given radius. The blades are of thin steel, and are fastened together at the end by a rivet, thus forming a tool similar to the familiar screw pitch gage. The right-hand corner of each blade is rounded off to the given radius, while the left-hand corner is cut away to the same radius, thus providing an instrument to be used for either convex or concave surfaces. The radius to which each blade is shaped is plainly stamped upon the side.[27]

Fig. 49 shows a radius gauge that has proven to be very useful for tasks like rounding corners or grinding tools to a specific radius. The blades are made of thin steel and are held together at the end by a rivet, creating a tool similar to the common screw pitch gauge. The right-hand corner of each blade is rounded to the specified radius, while the left-hand corner is cut away to the same radius, making it suitable for both convex and concave surfaces. The radius for each blade is clearly stamped on the side.[27]

Gage for Grinding Drills

Drill Grinding Gage

Fig. 50. Gage for Grinding Drills

Fig. 50. Gage for Grinding Drills

Fig. 50. Gauge for Grinding Drills

Fig. 50 shows a gage for use in grinding drills, which has been found very handy and accurate. This gage enables either a large or small drill to lie solidly in the groove provided for it on top of the gage, and the lips can then be tested for their truth in width, or angle, much easier and quicker than with the gages in common use without the groove. There is a line, to set the blade B by, on the stock at an angle of 59 degrees at the top of the graduated blade, and the user can easily make other lines, if needed for special work. The blade is clamped in position by the knurled nut N at the back, and can be thus adjusted to any angle. The stock A is cut away where the blade is pivoted on, so that one side of the blade comes directly in line with the middle of the groove.[28]

Fig. 50 shows a gauge for grinding drills that has proven to be very useful and precise. This gauge allows both large and small drills to sit firmly in the groove on top of the gauge, making it much easier and quicker to check the lips for accuracy in width or angle compared to standard gauges that don't have the groove. There's a line on the stock to set the blade B at a 59-degree angle at the top of the graduated blade, and users can easily create additional lines if needed for specific tasks. The blade is secured in place by the knurled nut N at the back and can be adjusted to any angle. The stock A is cut away where the blade pivots, allowing one side of the blade to align directly with the center of the groove.[28]

Tool for Gaging Taper Threaded Holes

Tool for Measuring Tapered Threaded Holes

Fig. 51. Tool for Gaging Taper Threaded Holes

Fig. 51. Tool for Gaging Taper Threaded Holes

Fig. 51. Tool for Measuring Tapered Threaded Holes

The tool shown in Fig. 51 is used for gaging taper threaded holes in boilers when fitting studs. It is a simple, though very useful and economical tool, and it will doubtless be appreciated by those having much work of this kind to do. The hole in which the stud is to be fitted is calipered by filling the threads of the plug with chalk, and then screwing the plug in the hole. When the plug is removed the chalk will show exactly the largest diameter of the hole.[29]

The tool shown in Fig. 51 is used for measuring tapered threaded holes in boilers when installing studs. It's a straightforward yet very handy and cost-effective tool, and it's sure to be appreciated by anyone who does a lot of this kind of work. The hole where the stud will be placed is measured by filling the threads of the plug with chalk and then screwing the plug into the hole. When the plug is taken out, the chalk will clearly indicate the largest diameter of the hole.[29]

Contour Gage

Contour Gauge

Fig. 52. Setting Contour Gage to Turned Sample

Fig. 52. Setting Contour Gage to Turned Sample

Fig. 52. Adjusting the Contour Gage to the Turned Sample

Fig. 53. End View of Contour Gage

Fig. 53. End View of Contour Gage

Fig. 53. End View of Contour Gage

Figs. 52, 53 and 54 illustrate a special tool which will be found of great value in certain classes of work. The need of some such device becomes apparent when patterns and core boxes are required to be accurately checked with the drawings of brass specialties, in particular. The tool is applied to the work, and the wires pressed down onto the contour by using the side of a lead pencil. Of course, patterns parted on the center could have their halves laid directly on the drawing without using the contour gage, but some patterns are cored and inseparable. Such a tool proves a relentless check upon the patternmaker, who, by making the patterns larger than necessary, can cause a considerable loss in a business where thousands of casts are made yearly from the same patterns. As a ready and universal templet it is very useful.[30]

Figs. 52, 53, and 54 show a special tool that is extremely useful for certain types of work. The need for such a device becomes clear when patterns and core boxes must be accurately checked against the drawings for brass specialties, in particular. The tool is used on the work, and the wires are pressed down onto the shape using the side of a pencil. Naturally, patterns that can be separated at the center can have their halves placed directly on the drawing without the contour gauge, but some patterns are cored and cannot be separated. This tool serves as a constant check for the patternmaker, who, by making patterns larger than necessary, can lead to significant losses in a business that produces thousands of casts each year from the same patterns. As a quick and universal template, it is very useful.[30]

Fig. 54. Testing Core-box with Gage

Fig. 54. Testing Core-box with Gage

Fig. 54. Testing Core-box with Gauge

Testing a Lead-screw

Testing a Lead Screw

Fig. 55. Micrometer for Testing Lathe Lead-screw

Fig. 55. Micrometer for Testing Lathe Lead-screw

Fig. 55. Micrometer for Checking Lathe Lead-screw

A reliable way for testing the pitch of a lead-screw, at any position of its length, is to procure a micrometer screw and barrel complete, such as can be purchased from any of the manufacturers of accurate measuring instruments, and bore out a holder so that the axis of the micrometer screw will be parallel to the holder when the screw is in place, as shown in Fig. 55. With the lathe geared for any selected pitch, the nut engaged with the lead-screw, and all backlash of screw, gears, etc., properly taken up, clamp the micrometer holder to the lathe bed, as shown in Fig. 56, so that the body of the holder is parallel to the carriage. Adjust the micrometer to one inch when the point of the screw bears against the carriage and with a surface gage scribe a line on the outer edge of the faceplate. Now rotate the lathe spindle any number of full revolutions that are required to cause the carriage to travel over the portion of the lead-screw that is being tested, bringing the line on the faceplate to the surface gage point. If the distance traveled by the carriage is not greater than one inch, the micrometer will indicate the error directly. For lengths of carriage travel greater than one inch, an end measuring rod, set to the number of even inches required, can be used between the micrometer point and lathe carriage. The error in the lead-screw is then easily determined by the adjustment that may be required to make a contact for the measuring points between the carriage and the micrometer screw. The pitch can be tested at as many points as are considered necessary by using end measuring rods, of lengths selected, set to good vernier calipers. The style of holder shown can, with the micrometer screw, be used for numerous other shop tests, and as the screw is only held by friction caused by the clamping screw, it can easily be removed and placed in any form of holder that is found necessary.[31]

A reliable way to test the pitch of a lead screw, at any point along its length, is to get a complete micrometer screw and barrel, which you can buy from any company that makes precise measuring tools. Then, you need to create a holder that keeps the micrometer screw's axis parallel to the holder when the screw is in position, as shown in Fig. 55. With the lathe set for your chosen pitch and the nut engaged with the lead screw, make sure to eliminate any backlash from the screw, gears, etc. Next, clamp the micrometer holder to the lathe bed, as shown in Fig. 56, ensuring that the body of the holder is parallel to the carriage. Set the micrometer to one inch when the tip of the screw touches the carriage and use a surface gauge to mark a line on the outer edge of the faceplate. Now, rotate the lathe spindle for as many full revolutions as needed to make the carriage travel over the section of the lead screw you're testing, aligning the line on the faceplate with the surface gauge point. If the carriage doesn't move more than one inch, the micrometer will directly show you the error. For carriage movements greater than one inch, you can use an end measuring rod, set to the required whole number of inches, between the micrometer tip and the lathe carriage. You can then easily determine the lead screw's error by adjusting to make contact for the measuring points between the carriage and the micrometer screw. You can check the pitch at as many points as necessary by using end measuring rods of selected lengths set to good vernier calipers. The holder style shown can also be used for various other tests in the shop, and since the screw is only held by the friction from the clamping screw, it can be easily removed and placed in any holder as needed.[31]

Fig. 56. Testing a Lathe Lead-screw

Fig. 56. Testing a Lathe Lead-screw

Fig. 56. Testing a Lathe Lead-screw

Simple Tool for Measuring Angles

Easy Angle Measurement Tool

Fig. 57. Special Tool for Measuring Angles

Fig. 57. Special Tool for Measuring Angles

Fig. 57. Special Tool for Measuring Angles

Fig. 57 shows a very simple, but at the same time, a very ingenious tool for measuring angles. Strictly speaking, the tool is not intended for measuring angles, but rather for comparing angles of the same size. The illustration shows so plainly both the construction and the application of the tool, that an explanation would seem superfluous. It will be noticed that any angle conceivable can be obtained in an instant, and the tool can be clamped at this angle by means of screws passing through the joints between the straight and curved parts of which the tool consists. Linear measurements can also be taken conveniently, one of the straight arms of the tool being graduated. As both of the arms which constitute the actual angle comparator are in the same plane, it is all the easier to make accurate comparisons. This tool is of German design, and is manufactured by Carl Mahr, Esslingen a. N.

Fig. 57 shows a very simple yet clever tool for measuring angles. Technically, this tool isn’t designed to measure angles, but to compare angles of the same size. The illustration clearly depicts both the design and use of the tool, making any explanation seem unnecessary. You’ll notice that any imaginable angle can be achieved instantly, and the tool can be locked in place at this angle using screws that go through the joints between the straight and curved parts of the tool. Linear measurements can also be taken conveniently, as one of the straight arms of the tool is marked with a scale. Since both arms of the angle comparator lie in the same plane, it makes accurate comparisons even easier. This tool is of German design and is manufactured by Carl Mahr, Esslingen a. N.

Bevel Gear-testing Gage

Bevel Gear Testing Tool

Fig. 58. Sensitive Gear-testing Gage

Fig. 58. Sensitive Gear-testing Gage

Fig. 58. Sensitive Gear Testing Gauge

In Fig. 58 is shown a sensitive gage for inspecting small bevel gears. The special case shown to which the gage is applied in the engraving is a small brass miter gear finished on a screw machine, in which case some of the holes through the gears were not concentric with the beveled face of the gears, causing the gears to bind when running together in pairs. The gage shown is quite inexpensive, but it indicates the slightest inaccuracy.

In Fig. 58, there's a sensitive gauge designed to inspect small bevel gears. The specific example shown in the illustration is a small brass miter gear made on a screw machine, where some of the holes in the gears weren’t aligned with the beveled face, causing them to jam when paired together. The gauge depicted is fairly inexpensive but can detect even the slightest inaccuracies.


NOTES

Notes

[1] Machinery, October, 1897.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Machinery, October 1897.

[2] M. H. Ball, April, 1902.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ M. H. Ball, April 1902.

[3] M. H. Ball, February, 1901.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ M. H. Ball, Feb 1901.

[4] Harry Ash, April, 1900.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Harry Ash, April 1900.

[5] M. H. Ball, March, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ M. H. Ball, March 1903.

[6] Ezra F. Landis, May, 1902.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Ezra F. Landis, May 1902.

[7] L. S. Brown, March, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ L. S. Brown, March 1903.

[8] C. W. Putnam, October, 1901.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ C. W. Putnam, October 1901.

[9] Jos. M. Stabel, May, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Jos. M. Stabel, May 1903.

[10] Jos. M. Stabel, May, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Jos. M. Stabel, May 1903.

[11] Jos. M. Stabel, May, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Jos. M. Stabel, May 1903.

[12] Jos. M. Stabel, May, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Jos. M. Stabel, May 1903.

[13] P. L. L. Yorgensen, February, 1908.

[13] P. L. L. Yorgensen, February, 1908.

[14] A. L. Monrad, December, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ A. L. Monrad, Dec 1903.

[15] A. L. Monrad, December, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ A. L. Monrad, Dec. 1903.

[16] A. L. Monrad, December, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ A. L. Monrad, Dec 1903.

[17] J. L. Marshall, February, 1908.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ J. L. Marshall, February 1908.

[18] Charles Sherman, November, 1905.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Charles Sherman, Nov 1905.

[19] M. H. Ball, May, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ M. H. Ball, May 1903.

[20] Chas. A. Kelley, May, 1908.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chas. A. Kelley, May 1908.

[21] H. J. Bachmann, December, 1902.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ H. J. Bachmann, Dec 1902.

[22] Wm. Ainscough, May, 1908.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Wm. Ainscough, May 1908.

[23] John Aspenleiter, October, 1900.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ John Aspenleiter, October 1900.

[24] W. W. Cowles, June, 1901.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ W. W. Cowles, June 1901.

[25] I. B. Niemand, December, 1904.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ I. B. Niemand, December 1904.

[26] Geo. M. Woodbury, February, 1902.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Geo. M. Woodbury, Feb 1902.

[27] A. Putnam, July, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ A. Putnam, July 1903.

[28] M. H. Ball, October, 1901.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ M. H. Ball, October 1901.

[29] F. Rattek, January, 1908.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ F. Rattek, January 1908.

[30] Howard D. Yoder, December, 1907.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Howard D. Yoder, December 1907.

[31] W. Cantelo, July, 1903.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ W. Cantelo, July 1903.


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!