This is a modern-English version of A Practical Treatise on Gas-light: Exhibiting a Summary Description of the Apparatus and Machinery Best Calculated for Illuminating Streets, Houses, and Manufactories, with Carburetted Hydrogen, or Coal-Gas, with Remarks on the Utility, Safety, and General Nature of this new Branch of Civil Economy., originally written by Accum, Friedrich Christian.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
Please see the Transcriber’s Notes at the end of this text.
Please see the Transcriber’s Notes at the end of this text.
A
Practical Guide
ON
Gaslight;
SHOWING
Overview
OF THE
APPARATUS AND MACHINERY
BEST CALCULATED FOR
SHINING
STREETS, HOMES, AND FACTORIES,
WITH
Hydrogen gas, or coal gas,
WITH REMARKS
ON THE
UTILITY, SAFETY, AND OVERALL NATURE OF THIS NEW BRANCH
OF CIVIL ECONOMY.
By FREDRICK ACCUM,
OPERATIVE CHEMIST,
LECTURER ON PRACTICAL CHEMISTRY, ON MINERALOGY, AND ON CHEMISTRY
APPLIED TO THE ARTS AND MANUFACTURES; MEMBER OF THE ROYAL
IRISH ACADEMY, FELLOW OF THE LINNÆN SOCIETY, MEMBER
OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF BERLIN, &c. &c.
By FREDRICK ACCUM,
OPERATIVE CHEMIST,
LECTURER ON PRACTICAL CHEMISTRY, MINERALOGY, AND CHEMISTRY
APPLIED TO THE ARTS AND MANUFACTURING; MEMBER OF THE ROYAL
IRISH ACADEMY, FELLOW OF THE LINNÆN SOCIETY, MEMBER
OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF BERLIN, etc. etc.
WITH SEVEN COLOURED PLATES.
WITH SEVEN COLORED PLATES.
London:
PRINTED BY G. HAYDEN, BRYDGES-STREET, COVENT GARDEN;
FOR R. ACKERMANN, 101, STRAND;
LONGMAN, HURST, REES, ORME, AND BROWN; AND SHERWOOD, NEELY, AND
JONES, PATERNOSTER ROW; AND J. HATCHARD, PICCADILLY.
London:
PRINTED BY G. HAYDEN, BRYDGES STREET, COVENT GARDEN;
FOR R. ACKERMANN, 101, STRAND;
LONGMAN, HURST, REES, ORME, AND BROWN; AND SHERWOOD, NEELY, AND
JONES, PATERNOSTER ROW; AND J. HATCHARD, PICCADILLY.
Price—Twelve Shillings in Boards.
Price—Twelve Shillings for Boards.
1815.
1815.
EX FUMO DARE LUCEM.
From smoke, bring light.
Hor.
Hor.
PREFACE.
11, Compton Street Soho.
11 Compton St, Soho.
The following pages are intended to exhibit a summary view of the new art of procuring light, by means of carburetted hydrogen gas obtained from pit-coal, and which of late has been employed with unparalelled success, as a substitute for candles and lamps, and is known by the name of Gas-Light.
The following pages aim to provide a summary of the new method for producing light using carburetted hydrogen gas derived from coal, which has recently been used with unmatched success as a substitute for candles and lamps, and is referred to as Gaslight.
To accomplish this object, I have given, in the first part of this Essay, a concise and popular view of the chemical theory and production of artificial light—I have explained the action of candles and lamps—I have shown the methods of measuring the comparative illuminating power of artificial light of different kinds, so as to appreciate their economical value—I have stated the proportions of combustible materials requisite for producing a light of a certain strength; with such other preliminary facts and observations as were deemed necessary to enable the reader to understand fully the nature of the new art of illumination, which it is the object of this Essay to describe.
To achieve this goal, I've provided, in the first part of this Essay, a clear and accessible overview of the chemical theory and production of artificial light. I’ve explained how candles and lamps work and demonstrated how to measure the relative brightness of different types of artificial light to evaluate their cost-effectiveness. I've outlined the amounts of fuel needed to produce light of a specific brightness, along with other essential facts and observations that will help the reader fully grasp the nature of the new art of illumination that this Essay aims to describe.
These positions are followed by a chemical view of the general nature and composition of coal—the chemical changes which this substance suffers, when employed in the production of gas-light—the different[ii] products it furnishes—the modes of obtaining them—their properties and applications in the various arts of life.
These positions are followed by a chemical perspective on the overall nature and composition of coal—the chemical changes this substance undergoes when used to produce gas lighting—the different[ii] products it provides—the ways to obtain them—their properties and uses in various aspects of life.
I have given a description of the apparatus and machinery by means of which the coal-gas is prepared, and the methods employed for distributing and applying it as a substitute for candles and lamps to illuminate houses, streets and manufactories;—I have furnished the data for calculating the expense that must attend the application of this species of light under different circumstances, so as to determine the relative cost or value of gas-lights, when compared with the lights now in use—together with such other practical directions and facts as will enable the reader to form a proper estimate of the gas-light illumination, and to put this art into practice.
I've described the equipment and machinery used to produce coal gas, along with the methods for distributing and using it as a replacement for candles and lamps to light up homes, streets, and factories. I’ve provided the information needed to calculate the costs associated with using this type of lighting in various situations, allowing for a comparison of the cost or value of gas lights against the current lighting options. Additionally, I've included practical tips and facts that will help the reader evaluate gas light illumination and apply this method effectively.
I have stated the leading objects of public and private utility to which the new system of lighting may be successfully applied, candidly pointing out those in which it cannot be made use of to advantage.
I have outlined the main purposes of public and private benefit that the new lighting system can effectively be used for, openly indicating where it cannot be beneficial.
I have detailed the most obvious effects which the discovery of lighting with coal-gas must inevitably produce upon the arts and upon domestic economy; its primary advantages—its views—its limits, and the resources it presents to industry and public economy. I have endeavoured to show how far its application is safe, and in what respect it is entitled to public approbation and national encouragement.
I have outlined the most obvious effects that the discovery of lighting with coal gas will definitely have on the arts and home economics; its main benefits—its potential—its limitations, and the opportunities it offers to industry and public finance. I have tried to demonstrate how safe its use is and in what ways it deserves public support and national encouragement.
It may not be improper, before concluding, to inform the reader, that my qualifications for the task I have undertaken are founded upon many years experience, during which time, I possessed peculiar opportunities to witness and verify the most extended series of operations that ever have been made for the purpose of ascertaining the practicability, safety, and general nature of the art of applying coal-gas as a substitute for tallow and oil; and which have, as it were, fixed the fate of this art. The numerous experiments I instituted, upon a large scale, by desire of the Gas-Light Company, for the purpose of adducing them in my evidence before the House of Commons, and House of Lords, on a former occasion, have enabled me to collect such information as could not have been obtained by other means. The substance of these results (which are printed by order of Government,) are incorporated in this Treatise, together with such other facts and observations as have presented themselves in the routine of my profession elsewhere.
It might not be out of place, before wrapping up, to let the reader know that my qualifications for the task I’ve taken on come from many years of experience. During that time, I had unique opportunities to see and confirm the longest series of operations ever conducted to determine the feasibility, safety, and overall nature of using coal gas as a replacement for tallow and oil, which, in a way, decided the future of this field. The many experiments I carried out on a large scale, at the request of the Gas-Light Company, to present them as evidence before the House of Commons and the House of Lords on a previous occasion, allowed me to gather information that couldn’t have been obtained in any other way. The essence of these results (which are printed by order of the Government) is included in this Treatise, along with other facts and observations that have come up in the course of my profession.
To generalize the results of my observations, and to make them practically useful to the public, is the aim of the present publication, and I need scarcely add, that their suffrages to the zeal and industry, at least, with which I have endeavoured to attain my object, will be a source of infinite satisfaction.
To summarize the results of my observations and make them genuinely useful to the public is the goal of this publication. I should mention that their support for the dedication and effort I’ve put into this work will be immensely rewarding.
FREDRICK ACCUM
FREDRICK ACCUM
Contents.
INTRODUCTORY OBSERVATION. | Page | 1. |
Progress of the arts.—Influence of it upon the morals and condition of man.—Beneficial tendency of chemical and mechanical improvements.—State of pre-eminence of people with regard to civilization.—How to be estimated.—Flourishing state of those nations which have shown the greatest activity in cultivating the useful arts, and establishing useful enterprises.—General observations on this subject.—Extraordinary discoveries of modern times.—New art of procuring light.—Object of the treatise. | ||
PART I. | ||
PRODUCTION OF ARTIFICIAL LIGHT, &c. | 8. | |
Production of the flame generated during the combustion of certain bodies.—Characters of flame when perfect.—Most luminous flame, how produced with the least consumption of combustible matter.—Conditions necessary for that purpose.—Importance of this subject, with regard to the production and supply of artificial light.—The flame of bodies may be tinged.—Blue flame, red flame, green flame, &c.—Opinion concerning the origin of light emitted by bodies burning with flame.—Philosophy of the subject.—Theory of the action of the instruments of illumination.—Rude method of procuring light employed in some countries.—Chemical action of candles, and lamps.—Agency of the tallow, oil, &c.—Office of the wick.—Reason why tallow candles require snuffing, and wax candles snuff themselves—Further observations on the subject. | ||
METHOD OF ASCERTAINING THE ILLUMINATING POWER OF CANDLES, LAMPS, AND OTHER LUMINOUS BODIES. | 22. | |
Optical principle assumed as law for determining the relative strength of lights of different kinds.—Admeasurement of the intensities of light.—Quantity of wax, tallow, oil, &c. requisite for producing a light of a certain strength.—Method of increasing the light of tallow candles, and to obviate the necessity of snuffing them.—A tallow candle placed in an inclined position gives more light than when placed perpendicularly and snuffed with an instrument.—Explanation of the fact.—Further observations on this subject.—Comparative cost of the light obtained by burning tallow candles of different sorts and sizes. | ||
PART II.[ii] | ||
GAS-LIGHT. | 47. | |
Encouragement given by the legislature to the new system of procuring light.—Gas-light company, incorporated by charter, to apply the new art of illumination by way of experiment, on a large scale, to illuminate the streets and houses of the metropolis.—Power and authorities granted to this corporate body.—are very restricted, and do not prevent other individuals from entering into competition with them.—Boundaries of their experiments.—limit of capital employed by them.—Power of His Majesty with regard to the gas-light charter. | ||
THEORY OF THE COMBUSTION OF COAL IN ELUCIDATION OF THE NATURE OF GAS-LIGHT. | 49. | |
Natural history of pit-coal.—Immediate constituent parts of coal.—Their relative quantities—are different in different kinds of coal.—Phenomena, which happen during the combustion of coal.—Analysis of coal by distillation.—Great waste of matter capable of producing light and heat, in the usual mode of burning coal.—Proofs of this statement.—Theory of the production of gas-light, compared with the production of light obtained by candles and lamps.—Place which the discovery of lighting with gas occupies in the philosophical order of knowledge. | ||
HISTORICAL SKETCH OF THE RISE AND PROGRESS OF THE APPLICATION OF COAL-GAS AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR PROCURING ARTIFICIAL LIGHT. | 55. | |
The discovery of the inflammable nature and application of coal-gas for the production of artificial light, cannot be claimed by any body now living.—Early notices of the inflammable property of the gas obtained by distilling coal.—Attempts to substitute it for tallow and oil.—Experiments made with coal-gas by Dr. Clayton, Dr. Hales, and the Bishop of Llandaff.—First successful attempt of lighting manufactories with gas.—Creditor and debtor account concerning the expence of this mode of illumination, when compared with the light obtained by tallow candles.—Claims of Mr. Murdoch with regard to the economical application of coal-gas.—Claims of Mr. Winsor.—Experiments of Mr. North, Mr. Clegg, Mr. Chef, Mr. Ackermann.—Economical statements of the gas-light illumination when compared with the cost of the same quantity of light obtained by means of candles and lamps. | ||
THEORY OF THE PRODUCTION OF GAS-LIGHT; AND DESCRIPTION OF A PORTABLE APPARATUS FOR ILLUSTRATING, IN THE SMALL WAY, THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE NEW SYSTEM OF PROCURING LIGHT.[iii] | 77. | |
Philosophy of the production of coal-gas.—Characters of the various products which the gas-light process affords, their quantities, and modes of obtaining them.—Quantity of gas obtainable from a given weight of coal.—Illuminating power of a given bulk of coal-gas compared with the illuminating power of a given weight of tallow candles.—Practical directions with regard to the production of the gas from coal.—Its chemical constitution and analysis.—Pit-coal is not the only substance which affords carburetted hidrogen gas.—This gas exists ready formed in nature.—Mode of collecting it when found native.—Is given out by all kinds of vegetable matter, submitted to distillation in close vessels.—Other sources of obtaining this gazeous fluid.—Practical directions with regard to the method of obtaining from coal, this gazeous substance, as best suited for illumination.—Chemical constitution of coal-gas.—How ascertained. | ||
UTILITY OF THE GAS-LIGHT ILLUMINATION WITH REGARD TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ECONOMY. | 99. | |
Objects to which the new system of lighting with gas may be beneficially applied.—Capital advantages of the gas-light illumination.—Places and public edifices lighted with coal-gas in this metropolis.—Situations best suited for the application of gas-lights.—places where it cannot be used to advantage.—Illumination of barracks, arsenals, dock yards, &c. with coal-gas.—Further observations on this subject.—Great heat produced by gas-lights.—Reason why the flame of coal-gas produces more heat than the flame of candles and lamps.—Admeasurement of the comparative degrees of heat produced by gas-lights, oil lamps, tallow and wax candles, &c.—Gas lamps and burners, various kinds of.—Ornamental chandeliers and candelabras, for applying coal-gas as a substitute for oil.—Other products obtainable from coal besides gas.—Coke.—Its nature.—Combustion of it.—Produces a more strong and lasting heat than coal.—Explanation of this fact.—Advantages resulting from the use of coke as fuel.—Disadvantages of its application in certain circumstances.—Relative effect of heat produced by equal quantities of coke and charcoal.—Method of measuring the comparative effect of different kinds of fuel in producing heat.—Capital advantages resulting from the application of coke, as fuel, in the art of burning lime.—Plaster of Paris, bricks, &c.—Quantity of coke obtainable from [iv]a certain quantity of pit-coal.—Kind of coke best suited for metallurgical operations.—Mode of obtaining it in the gas-light process.—Sort of coke best adapted for kitchen and parlour fires.—Manufacture of it.—Coal tar.—How obtained.—Its properties.—Earl of Dundonald’s method of manufacturing tar from coal.—Quantity of coal-tar produced in the gas-light process from a given quantity of coal.—Characters of coal tar obtained from Newcastle coal, differ from that produced from canel coal.—Coal pitch.—Process for obtaining it.—Properties of coal-pitch.—Use of it in the arts.—quantity of coal-pitch obtainable from a given quantity of tar.—Ammoniacal liquor produced during the distillation of coal.—Its chemical constitution.—Quantity obtained from a given quantity of coal.—General observation respecting the scheme of applying coal-gas as a substitute for candles and lamps.—Effects which it must produce upon the arts and upon domestic economy.—Its views.—Primary advantages.—Resources which it presents to industry and public economy.—In what respect it is entitled to public approbation and national encouragement.—Effects of prejudice against the introduction of new and useful discoveries.—Have operated strongly in retarding the gas-light illumination.—Remarkable slowness with which improvements of extended utility make their way into common use, contrasted with the rapid adoption of fashionable changes.—Other causes unfavourable to the adoption of new and useful plans.—Further observations on this subject.—The new system of lighting with coal-gas can never supersede the use of candles and moveable lights.—Gas-light illumination cannot prove injurious to the Greenland fishery—nor can it diminish the coal trade—must prove beneficial to it.—The price of coal even when it is the highest cannot materially affect the beneficial application of gas-lights.—Striking advantages to be derived from the introduction of gas-lights into manufactories.—Principal expense which must always attend the gas-light illumination.—Is the dead capital employed for erecting the machinery.—Floating capital is small.—Advice to private individuals with regard to the erection of a gas-light apparatus calculated for their own use.—Expence which must attend the application of the new system of lighting under different circumstances.—Entire new scheme of illuminating streets, or small towns, with gas-lights; which would save all the main pipes for conveying the gas through the streets as well as the branch pipes which conduct the gas to the lamps.—Management of the gas-light machinery is extremely simple and easy.—The apparatus not liable to be out of order.—Observations on the safety of the gas-light illumination.—Misapprehension of the public concerning it.—Causes that have alarmed the public concerning the application of the new lights.—Gas-lights cannot give rise to those accidents which have so often arisen from the careless snuffing of candles, [v]&c.—Produce no embers or sparks.—Cannot fall, or be disturbed without becoming extinguished.—Are the safest of all lights.—Impossibility of streets or towns lighted with gas to be thrown suddenly into darkness by the fracture of the gas-pipes conveying the gas to the lamps—or by the destruction of one or more of the gas-light machineries employed for preparing the gas.—Illustration showing the absurdity of such mistaken notions.—Curious self-extinguishing lamp, invented by Mr. Clegg.—His machine which measures and registers in the absence of the observer, the quantity of gas delivered by a pipe communicating with a gas-light main.—Leading characters of the new lights.—Objects and views which this art embraces.—It must lessen the consumption of oil.—Occasion a defalcation in the revenue. | ||
TABULAR VIEW, Exhibiting the quantity of Gasoline, Coca-Cola, Tar, Presents, Essential Oil, and Ammonia Solution, obtainable from a given quantity of Coal: together with an estimate of the quantity of Coal necessary to produce a quantity of Gas, capable of yielding a Light equal in duration of time and intensity to that produced by Tallow Candles of different kinds. | 164. | |
DESCRIPTION OF THE GAS-LIGHT APPARATUS. | 166. | |
METHOD of correcting the relative pressure of the Gasometer, so as to cause the gas which it contains to be uniformly of an equal density. | 181. | |
DIRECTIONS TO WORKMEN ATTENDING THE GAS-LIGHT APPARATUS. | 182. | |
ESTIMATE of the price of a Gas-Light Apparatus. | 185. | |
LONDON Price List of the most essential articles employed in the erection of a Gas-light Apparatus. | 186. |
ERRATA.
Page | 24, | line | 11, | for too, read two. |
48, | 22, | for corporated, read incorporated. | ||
53, | 7, | for this combustion, read the combustion. | ||
64, | 24, | for Clegg, read Clegg. | ||
ibid | 25, | for communicates, read communicated. | ||
65, | erase the * and put it after the word Clegg, line 24, p. 64. | |||
ibid | 17, | for attemps, read attempts. | ||
125, | 23, | for degree, read degrees. | ||
132, | 25, | for coal, read coal-tar. |
DIRECTIONS TO THE BINDER:
Plate I. facing the title; plate II. facing page 79; plate III. facing page 115; plate IV. facing page 119; plate V. facing page 120; and plates VI. and VII. at the end of the book.
Plate I. facing the title; plate II. facing page 79; plate III. facing page 115; plate IV. facing page 119; plate V. facing page 120; and plates VI. and VII. at the end of the book.
A
PRACTICAL TREATISE
ON
GAS-LIGHT.
A
PRACTICAL GUIDE
ON
GAS LIGHTING.
INTRODUCTORY OBSERVATION.
INFLUENCE
OF
THE PROGRESS OF THE ARTS
UPON THE
MORALS AND CONDITION OF MAN.
It is an undoubted truth, that the successive improvements in the condition of man, from a state of ignorance and barbarism, to that of the highest cultivation and refinement, are usually effected by the aid of machinery and expedients, calculated to procure the necessaries, the comforts, and the elegancies of life; and that the pre-eminence of any people in[2] civilization is, and ought ever to be, estimated by the proportional state of industry, and useful labour existing among them.
It’s a proven fact that the continuous advancements in the condition of humanity, from ignorance and barbarism to the highest levels of education and refinement, are typically achieved with the help of machinery and methods designed to provide the essentials, comforts, and luxuries of life. Moreover, the superiority of any society in [2] civilization is, and should always be, assessed by the level of industry and productive work present within it.
In proof of this great and striking truth, no other argument requires to be offered, than an immediate reference to the experience of all ages and places: the various nations of the earth, the provinces of each nation, the towns, and even the villages of the same province, differ from each other in their accommodations; and are in every respect more flourishing, the greater their activity in establishing new channels of useful employ, calculated to procure the necessaries and comforts of life. Hence the nations which have shewn the most ingenuity in this way, are not only the richest, but also the most populous and the best defended: the provinces of those nations, are seen to flourish likewise in proportion to their respective degrees of activity in this respect, And from these exertions it is, as Smith[1] emphatically remarks, that “the accommodation of an European prince does not always so much exceed that of an industrious[3] and frugal peasant, as the accommodation of the latter exceeds that of many an African king, the absolute master of the lives and liberties of ten thousand naked savages.”
To prove this important and striking truth, no other argument is needed beyond looking at the experiences of all ages and places: the various nations of the world, the regions within each nation, the cities, and even the villages in the same region all differ in their resources; and in every way, they thrive more when they actively create new avenues for useful work that provide for the essentials and comforts of life. Thus, the nations that have demonstrated the most creativity in this regard are not only the richest but also the most populous and well-defended: the regions of those nations also flourish in proportion to how active they are in this area. As Smith[1] pointedly notes, “the lifestyle of a European prince does not always exceed that of a hardworking and frugal peasant as much as the lifestyle of the latter exceeds that of many an African king, who is the absolute ruler over the lives and freedoms of ten thousand naked savages.”
[1] Wealth of Nations, chap. 1.
Wealth of Nations, chap. 1.
It was a strange notion of Rousseau to maintain that mankind were happier when they resembled wild beasts, than with all the expanded knowledge of civilized life; and that the cultivation of their understanding had tended to degenerate their virtues. There can be no virtue but what is founded on a comprehensive estimate of the effects of human actions, and an animal under the guidance of instinct can form no such estimate.
It was a strange idea from Rousseau to claim that people were happier when they acted like wild animals than with all the knowledge that comes from civilized life; and that developing their understanding had actually led to a decline in their virtues. There can be no virtue that is based on anything other than a thorough understanding of the consequences of human actions, and an animal guided only by instinct cannot make such an understanding.
The variety of production, of wants, and fabrication of a civilized society, has given rise to barter or exchange; mutual supply has increased the sub-division of labour, and improved the means of conveyance. Streams, roads, ships, and carriages have extended their beneficial intercourse; confidence between man and man has advanced the moral principles of society, and afforded a progression, of which the past gradation may indeed be traced, but to the future part of which the[4] imagination can scarcely form a probable outline. And as the moral and physical powers of man expand, new resources and new agencies are made subservient to our commands, which, in an earlier state of society, would have appeared altogether visionary.
The variety of production, needs, and manufacturing in a civilized society has led to barter or exchange; mutual supply has increased the division of labor and improved transportation methods. Rivers, roads, ships, and vehicles have expanded their beneficial interactions; trust between people has advanced the moral values of society, leading to progress that can be traced in the past but of which the future is hard for the imagination to outline. As the moral and physical abilities of humans grow, new resources and new tools become available to us, which would have seemed completely visionary in an earlier societal state.
Who among the ancients would have listened to the extraordinary scheme of writing books with such rapidity, that one man, by this new art, should perform the work of twenty thousand amanuenses? What philosopher would have given credit to the daring project of navigating the widest ocean?—or imagined the astonishing effect of gun-powder—or the extended application of the steam engine? What mortal would have dared to dive to the bottom of the sea—or to soar aloft into the air—or bid defiance to the thunder of the clouds? Discoveries which have changed, as it were, the course of human affairs, and the effects of which have already carried the intellectual operations of the human mind, to a height they could by no other means have attained. The men of those early ages, in the confidence of their own wisdom, might have derided these discoveries as impossible, or rejected[5] them as visionary; but to those, who enjoy the full effects of such, and numerous other successful inventions, it becomes a duty to reason upon different principles, and to exert all means in their power to give effect to the progress of useful knowledge.
Who among the ancients would have believed the incredible idea of writing books so quickly that one person, using this new technique, could do the work of twenty thousand scribes? What philosopher would have accepted the bold idea of crossing the vast ocean?—or imagined the amazing impact of gunpowder—or the widespread use of the steam engine? What person would have dared to dive to the ocean floor—or soar up into the sky—or defy the thunder in the clouds? These discoveries have, in a way, changed the course of human events, and their effects have already elevated the intellectual capacity of the human mind to heights it could never have reached otherwise. The people of those early times, confident in their own knowledge, might have mocked these discoveries as impossible or dismissed[5] them as fantasies; but for those who reap the full benefits of such, and many other successful inventions, it is their duty to think differently and use all available means to promote the advancement of useful knowledge.
The artificial production and supply of light during the absence of the sun, unquestionably holds a distinguished rank among the most important arts of civilized life.
The artificial creation and provision of light when the sun is not present undoubtedly ranks as one of the most essential skills of modern life.
If we could for a moment suppose the privation of artificial light, it would follow as an immediate consequence that the greatest part of the globe on which we dwell, would cease to be the habitation of man. Whether he could ensnare or overtake those animals upon whose unprepared remains he would then be compelled to feed—whether he might store the fruits of the earth for his winter supply—what might be the physical and moral consequences of a state of such desolation, may perhaps be conjectured; but no estimate can show its dreadful magnitude. How much do our comforts, and how greatly does the extent of our powers, in the common affairs of life, depend upon the production and supply[6] of artificial light. The flame of a single candle animates a family, every one follows his occupation, and no dread is felt of the darkness of night. It might be a curious speculation to enquire how far, and in what respects, the morals of men would become degraded by the want of this contrivance. But it is sufficient on the present occasion, that, previous to entering upon a dissertation respecting a new art of illumination, a train of ideas has slightly been hinted at, which cannot fail to show its magnitude and importance. The methods of procuring and distributing light, during the absence of the sun, have not hitherto attained the extent of their possible perfection: there is yet a wide field for improvement in the construction of the instruments of illumination, and the subject is highly deserving the attention of every individual.
If we could imagine a world without artificial light for a moment, it would quickly become clear that most of the places where we live would no longer support human existence. Whether people could catch or hunt the animals they’d need to survive, or whether they could stockpile fruits from the earth for winter, and what the physical and moral effects of such devastation might be could probably be guessed, but it’s impossible to measure the true extent of the disaster. Our comforts and our ability to manage everyday tasks heavily rely on the production and availability of artificial light[6]. The glow of a single candle brings a family to life, everyone can go about their work, and there’s no fear of the darkness at night. It would be interesting to consider how much the morals of people would decline without this technology. However, what’s most important right now is that, before diving into a discussion about a new way to create light, we’ve touched on some ideas that highlight its importance and significance. The ways we generate and distribute light after sunset have not yet reached their full potential: there is still a lot of room for improvement in how we create lighting devices, and this topic deserves the attention of everyone.
The scheme of lighting houses, streets, and manufactories, by means of the inflammable gas, obtainable by distillation from common pit-coal, professes to increase the wealth of the nation, by adding to the number of its internal resources, and on this ground it is entitled, at least, to a candid examination.
The plan to light homes, streets, and factories using flammable gas derived from the distillation of regular coal claims to boost the nation’s wealth by expanding its internal resources. For this reason, it deserves at least a fair assessment.
The apparent slight that has been thrown upon this new breach of civil economy by some individuals, who appear to be incapable of judging of its nature, has contributed to deter sensible and well disposed persons from wishing it success. It is the more necessary to state this fact, because, when a mistaken notion once becomes diffused, concerning the nature of a new project, persons of the best intention are liable to become affected with wrong impressions on their mind. I am neither a share holder, nor a governor, nor am I directly or indirectly concerned in any gas-light association.
The obvious dismissal of this new development in civil economy by some people, who seem unable to understand its nature, has discouraged sensible and well-meaning individuals from wanting it to succeed. It’s important to point this out because, once a misunderstanding spreads about a new initiative, even the most well-intentioned people can be influenced by false impressions. I am neither a shareholder, nor a governor, nor am I involved directly or indirectly in any gas-light association.
The object of the succeeding pages, simply is to rescue the art of illumination with coal-gas from misconception and misrepresentation, and by a fair, and not overcharged statement of its merits and its disadvantages, to appeal from prejudice and ignorance, to the good sense of the community.
The goal of the following pages is to clear up misunderstandings and misrepresentations about the art of illumination with coal gas. By presenting a reasonable and honest assessment of its advantages and disadvantages, we aim to appeal to the common sense of the community, free from bias and ignorance.
PART I.
PRODUCTION
OF
ARTIFICIAL LIGHT;
AND
THEORY
OF THE
ACTION OF CANDLES AND LAMPS.
The flame of burning bodies consists of such inflammable matter in the act of combustion as is capable of existing in a gazeous state. When all circumstances are favorable to the complete combustion of the products, the flame is perfect; if this is not the case, part of the combustible body, capable of being converted into the gazeous state, passes through the luminous flame unburnt, and exhibits the appearance of smoke. Soot therefore always indicates an imperfect combustion. Hence[9] flame is produced from those inflammable substances only, which are either totally volatile when heat is applied to them, so as not to alter their chemical habitudes—or which contain a quantity of combustible matter that is readily volatilized into vapour by heat, or the elements necessary for producing such vapour or gazeous products, when the chemical constitution of the body is altered by an increase of temperature. And hence the flame of bodies is nothing else than the inflammable product, either in a vaporous or in a permanently elastic gazeous state. Thus originates the flame of wood and coal, when they are burned in their crude state. They contain the elements of a quantity of inflammable matter, which is capable of assuming the gazeous state by the application of heat, and subsequent new chemical arrangements of their constituent parts.
The flame from burning bodies consists of flammable material that is in the process of combustion and can exist in a gaseous state. When all conditions are right for complete combustion, the flame is perfect; if not, some of the combustible material that can turn into gas passes through the bright flame unburned, creating smoke. Therefore, soot always indicates incomplete combustion. Thus, a flame is produced from those flammable substances that are either completely volatile when heated, so they don’t change their chemical properties, or that have a quantity of combustible matter that easily vaporizes when heated, or contain the necessary elements to produce such vapor or gaseous products when their chemical structure is altered by increased temperature. So, the flame from materials is nothing but the flammable product, either in a vaporous or a continually elastic gaseous state. This is how the flame from wood and coal is created when they burn in their raw form. They contain elements of a significant amount of flammable material, which can turn into a gaseous state with heat and subsequent new chemical arrangements of their components.
As the artificial light of lamps and candles is afforded by the flame they exhibit, it seems a matter of considerable importance to society, to ascertain how the most luminous flame may be produced with the least consumption of combustible matter. There does not appear[10] to be any danger of error in concluding, that the light emitted will be greatest when the matter is completely consumed in the shortest time. It is therefore necessary, that the stream of volatilized combustible gazeous matter should pass into the atmosphere with a certain determinate velocity. If the quantity of this stream should not be duly proportioned; that is to say, if it be too large, its internal parts will not be completely burned for want of contact with the air. If its temperature be below that of ignition, it will not, in many cases, burn when it comes into the open air. And there is a certain velocity at which the quantity of atmospherical air which comes in contact with the vapour will be neither too great nor too small; for too much air will diminish the temperature of the stream of combustible matter so much as very considerably to impede the desired effect, and too little will render the combustion languid.
As the artificial light from lamps and candles comes from the flames they produce, it's important for society to figure out how to create the brightest flame while using the least amount of fuel. It's safe to conclude that the light will be brightest when the fuel is completely consumed in the quickest time. Therefore, it's essential that the flow of vaporized combustible gas enters the atmosphere at a specific speed. If this flow isn't properly adjusted—meaning if it's too large, its internal parts won’t burn completely due to lack of air contact. If its temperature is below the ignition point, it may not ignite once it’s exposed to open air. There’s a specific speed at which the amount of surrounding air that mixes with the vapor is just right; too much air will lower the temperature of the combustible stream significantly, hindering the desired effect, while too little will cause the combustion to be weak.
We have an example of a flame too large in the mouths of the chimneys of furnaces, where the luminous part is merely superficial, or of the thickness of about an inch or two, according to circumstances, and the internal part,[11] though hot, will not set fire to paper passed into it through an iron tube; the same defect of air preventing the combustion of the paper, as prevented the interior fluid itself from burning. And in the lamp of Argand we see the advantage of an internal current of air, which renders the combustion perfect by the application of air on both sides of a thin flame. So likewise a small flame is always whiter and more luminous than a larger; and a short snuff of a candle giving out less combustible matter in proportion to the circumambient air; the quantity of light becomes increased to eight or ten times what a long snuff would have afforded.
We can see an example of a flame that’s too big in the chimneys of furnaces, where the bright part is just on the surface, about an inch or two thick depending on the situation. The inside part, although hot, won’t ignite paper that’s pushed into it through an iron tube; the same lack of air that prevents the paper from burning also stops the internal fluid from igniting. In an Argand lamp, we see the benefit of having an internal air current which makes combustion better by supplying air on both sides of a thin flame. Similarly, a small flame is always whiter and brighter than a larger one, and a short wick on a candle produces less combustible material relative to the surrounding air, increasing the amount of light by eight to ten times compared to a longer wick.
The light of bodies burning with flame, exists previously either combined with the combustible body, or with the substance which supports the combustion. We know that light exists in some bodies as a constituent part, since it is disengaged from them when they enter into new combinations, but we are unable to obtain in a separate state the basis with which it was combined.
The light from burning objects comes from either the burning material itself or the substance that fuels the fire. We know that light is a part of some materials, as it is released when they undergo new reactions, but we can't isolate the element it was originally mixed with.
That in many cases the light evolved by artificial means is derived from the combustible[12] body, is obvious, if we recollect that the colour of the light emitted during the process of combustion varies, and that this variation usually depends not upon the medium which supports the process of combustion, but upon the combustible body itself. Hence the colour of the flame of certain combustibles, even of the purest kind may be tinged by the admixture of various substances.
That in many cases, the light produced by artificial means comes from the combustible[12] material, is clear if we remember that the color of the light emitted during combustion changes, and this change usually depends not on the medium supporting the combustion process, but on the combustible material itself. Therefore, the color of the flame from certain combustibles, even those of the highest purity, can be influenced by the presence of different substances.
The flame of a common candle is far from being of an uniform colour. The lowest part is always blue; and when the flame is sufficiently elongated, so as to be just ready to smoke, the tip is red or brown.
The flame of a regular candle is far from having a uniform color. The bottom part is always blue, and when the flame is long enough to almost start smoking, the tip becomes red or brown.
As for the colours of flames that arise from coals, wood, and other usual combustibles, their variety, which hardly amounts to a few shades of red or purple, intermixed with the bright yellow light, seems principally to arise from the greater or less admixture of aqueous vapour, dense smoke, or, in short, of other incombustible products which pass through the luminous flame unburnt.
As for the colors of flames that come from coals, wood, and other common fuels, their variety, which barely includes a few shades of red or purple mixed with bright yellow light, seems mainly to result from the varying amounts of water vapor, thick smoke, or, in short, other non-combustible products that pass through the glowing flame without burning.
Spirit of wine burns with a blueish flame. The flame of sulphur has nearly the same tinge. The flame of zinc is of a bright greenish[13] white. The flame of most of the preparations of copper, or of the substances with which they are mixed, is vivid green. Spirit of wine, mixed with common salt, when set on fire, burns with a very unpleasant effect, as may be experienced by looking at the spectators who are illuminated by such light. If a spoonful of spirit of wine and a little boracic acid, or nitrate of copper be stirred together in a cup, and then be set on fire, the flame will be beautifully green. If spirit of wine be mixed with nitrate of strontia, it will, afterwards, on being inflamed, burn with a carmine red colour. Muriate of lime tinges the flame of burning spirit of wine of an orange colour.[2]
The spirit of wine burns with a bluish flame. The flame from sulfur has a nearly identical color. The flame from zinc is a bright greenish-white. The flame from most copper preparations or the substances they’re mixed with is a vivid green. When spirit of wine is mixed with common salt and ignited, it burns with a very unpleasant effect, as can be seen by the spectators illuminated by that light. If you stir a spoonful of spirit of wine and a bit of boric acid or copper nitrate together in a cup, then set it on fire, the flame will be beautifully green. If spirit of wine is combined with strontium nitrate, it will burn with a carmine red color when ignited. Calcium chloride gives a burning spirit of wine flame an orange tint.[2]
[2] See Chemical Amusement, comprising minute instructions for performing a series of striking and interesting chemical experiments, p. 8, &c.
[2] Check out Chemical Amusement, which includes detailed instructions for carrying out a series of impressive and fascinating chemical experiments, p. 8, &c.
Before we consider the general nature of Gas-Light, it will be necessary to give a short sketch of the theory and action of the instruments of illumination employed for supplying light, together with some other facts connected with the artificial production and distribution of light; such a proceeding will enable us to understand the general nature of[14] the new system of illumination which it is the object of this Essay to explain.
Before we look at the overall nature of Gas-Light, it’s important to briefly outline the theory and function of the lighting instruments used to produce light, along with some other relevant facts about how light is artificially created and distributed. Doing this will help us grasp the general nature of[14] the new lighting system that this Essay aims to explain.
To procure light for the ordinary purposes of life, we are acquainted with no other ready means than the process of combustion.
To get light for everyday needs, we know of no other quick method than burning something.
The rude method of illumination consists, as is sufficiently known, in successively burning certain masses of fuel in the solid state: common fires answer this purpose in the apartments of houses, and in some light-houses. Small fires of resinous wood, and the bituminous fossil, called canel-coal, are in some countries applied to the same end, but the most general and useful contrivance is that in which fat, or oil, of an animal or vegetable kind is burned by means of a wick, and these contrivances comprehend candles and lamps.
The basic way of providing light involves burning solid fuel in sequence: regular fires serve this purpose in homes and some lighthouses. Small fires made from resinous wood and a type of fossil fuel called cannel coal are used for the same purpose in certain countries, but the most common and practical method is burning animal or vegetable fats or oils with a wick, which includes candles and lamps.
In the lamp the combustible substance must be one of those which retain their fluidity at the ordinary temperature of the atmosphere. The candle is formed of a material which is not fusible but at a temperature considerably elevated.
In the lamp, the fuel needs to be something that stays liquid at the normal temperature of the environment. The candle is made from a material that doesn't melt until it reaches a much higher temperature.
All these substances must be rendered volatile before they can produce a flame, but for this purpose it is sufficient to volatilize a small[15] quantity of any of them, successively; for this small quantity will suffice to give a useful light, and hence we must admire the simple, yet wonderful contrivance of a common candle or lamp. These bodies contain a considerable quantity of the combustible substance, sufficient to last several hours; they have likewise, in a particular place, a slender piece of spongy vegetable substance, called the wick, which in fact is the fire-place, or laboratory where the whole operation is conducted.
All these substances need to be made into a vapor before they can create a flame, but it's enough to vaporize a small[15] amount of any of them, one after the other; this small amount will be enough to provide a useful light. Therefore, we should appreciate the simple, yet amazing design of an ordinary candle or lamp. These items contain a significant amount of the flammable substance, enough to last for several hours. They also have, in a specific spot, a thin piece of spongy plant material, called the wick, which is essentially the fire-place or the laboratory where the entire process takes place.
There are three articles which demand our attention in the lamp—the oil, the wick, and the supply of air. It is required that the oil should be readily inflammable; the office of the wick appears to be chiefly, if not solely, to convey the oil by capillary attraction to the place of combustion; as the oil is decomposed into carburetted hydrogen gas and other products, other oil succeeds, and in this way a continual current and maintenance of flame is effected.
There are three key components that we need to focus on in the lamp—the oil, the wick, and the airflow. The oil needs to be easily ignitable; the main job of the wick seems to be, primarily, to draw the oil up through capillary action to where it burns; as the oil breaks down into gas and other byproducts, more oil flows in, which creates a steady supply and keeps the flame going.
When a candle is for the first time lighted, a degree of heat is given to the wick, sufficient first to melt, and next to decompose the tallow surrounding its lower surface; and just[16] in this part the newly generated gas and vapour is, by admixture with the air, converted into a blue flame; which, almost instantaneously encompassing the whole body of the vapour, communicates so much heat to it, as to make it emit a yellowish white light. The tallow now liquefied, as fast as it boils away at the top of the wick, is, by the capillary attraction of the same wick, drawn up to supply the place of what is consumed by the cotton. The congeries of capillary tubes, which form the wick, is black, because it is converted into coal; a circumstance common to it with all other vegetable and animal substances, when part of the carbon and hydrogen which enter into their composition having been acted on by combustion, the remainder and other fixed parts are by any means whatever covered and defended from the action of the air. In this case, the burning substance owes its protection to the surrounding flame. For when the wick, by the continual wasting of the tallow, becomes too long to support itself in a perpendicular situation, the top of it projects out of the cone formed by the flame, and thus being exposed to the action of the air, is ignited,[17] loses its blackness, and is converted into ashes; but that part of the combustible which is successively rendered volatile by the heat of the flame is not all burnt, but part of it escapes in the form of smoke through the middle of the flame, because that part cannot come in contact with the oxygen of the surrounding atmosphere; hence it follows, that with a large wick and a large flame, this waste of combustible matter is proportionately much greater than with a small wick and a small flame. In fact, when the wick is not greater than a single thread of cotton, the flame, though very small, is, however, peculiarly bright, and free from smoke; whereas in lamps, with very large wicks, such as are often suspended before butchers’ shops, or with those of the lamp-lighters, the smoke is very offensive, and in great measure eclipses the light of the flame.
When a candle is lit for the first time, heat is generated in the wick, enough to melt and break down the wax around its bottom. Here, the newly formed gas and vapor mix with the air to create a blue flame, which quickly engulfs the whole body of vapor, transferring enough heat to make it emit a yellowish-white light. The melted wax, as it boils off at the top of the wick, is drawn up by the capillary action of the wick to replace what is burned by the cotton. The cluster of tiny tubes that make up the wick appears black because it becomes charred, just like all other plant and animal materials, when some of the carbon and hydrogen in them combusts, leaving the rest covered and protected from the air. In this case, the flame itself provides that protection. When the wick, from the continuous melting of the wax, gets too long to stay upright, the top extends beyond the flame’s cone and is exposed to air, igniting, losing its blackness, and turning to ash. However, not all the volatile material produced by the heat of the flame burns completely; some escapes as smoke through the center of the flame because it can't access the oxygen in the surrounding air. This means that with a wider wick and larger flame, this loss of combustible material is much greater than with a narrow wick and smaller flame. In fact, when the wick is no thicker than a single cotton thread, the flame, although very small, is particularly bright and produces little to no smoke; whereas in lamps with much larger wicks, like those often seen in front of butcher shops or used by lamplighters, the smoke is very noticeable and largely dims the light of the flame.
A candle differs from a lamp in one very essential circumstance; viz. that the oil or tallow is liquefied, only as it comes into the vicinity of the combustion; and this fluid is retained in the hollow of the part, which is still concrete, and forms a kind of cup. The[18] wick, therefore, should not, on this account, be too thin, because if this were the case, it would not carry off the material as fast as it becomes fused; and the consequence would be, that it would gutter or run down the sides of the candle: and as this inconvenience arises from the fusibility of the tallow it is plain that a more fusible candle will require a larger wick; or that the wick of a wax candle may be made thinner than that of one of tallow. The flame of a tallow candle will of course be yellow, smoky, and obscure, except for a short time after snuffing. When a candle with a thick wick is first lighted, and the wick snuffed short, the flame is perfect and luminous, unless its diameter be very great; in which last case, there is an opake part in the middle, where the combustion is impeded for want of air. As the wick becomes longer, the interval between its upper extremity and the apex of the flame is diminished; and consequently the tallow which issues from that extremity, having a less space of ignition to pass through, is less completely burned, and passes off partly in smoke. This evil increases, until at length the upper extremity of the wick projects beyond[19] the flame and forms a support for an accumulation of soot which is afforded by the imperfect combustion, and which retains its figure, until, by the descent of the flame, the external air can have access to the upper extremity; but in this case, the requisite combustion which might snuff it, is not effected; for the portion of tallow emitted by the long wick is not only too large to be perfectly burned, but also carries off much of the heat of the flame, while it assumes the elastic state. By this diminished combustion, and increased afflux of half decomposed oil, a portion of coal or soot is deposited on the upper part of the wick, which gradually accumulates, and at length assumes the appearance of a fungus. The candle then does not give more than one-tenth of the light which the due combustion of its materials would produce; and, on this account, tallow candles require continual snuffing. But if we direct our attention to a wax candle, we find that as its wick lengthens, the light indeed becomes less. The wick, however, being thin and flexible, does not long occupy its place in the centre of the flame; neither does it, even in that situation, enlarge[20] the diameter of the flame, so as to prevent the access of air to its internal part. When its length is too great for the vertical position, it bends on one side; and its extremity, coming in contact with air, is burned to ashes; excepting such a portion as is defended by the continual afflux of melted wax, which is volatilized, and completely burned, by the surrounding flame. Hence it appears, that the difficult fusibility of wax renders it practicable to burn a large quantity of fluid by means of a small wick, and that this small wick, by turning on one side in consequence of its flexibility, performs the operation of snuffing itself, in a much more accurate manner than can ever be performed mechanically. From the above statement it appears, that the important object to society of rendering tallow candles equal to those of wax, does not at all depend on the combustibility of the respective materials, but upon a mechanical advantage in the cup, which is afforded by the inferior degree of fusibility in the wax: and that, in order to obtain this valuable object, one of the following effects must be produced: either the tallow must be burned in a lamp, to avoid the[21] gradual progression of the flame along the wick; or some means must be devised to enable the candle to snuff itself, as the wax-candle does; or the tallow itself must be rendered less fusible by some chemical process. The object is, in a commercial point of view, entitled to assiduous and extensive investigation. Chemists in general suppose the hardness or less fusibility of wax to arise from oxygen. Mr. Nicholson[3] is led by various considerations to imagine, that the spontaneous snuffing of candles made of tallow or other fusible materials, will scarcely be effected but by the discovery of some material for the wick, which shall be voluminous enough to absorb the tallow, and at the same time sufficiently flexible to bend on one side.
A candle is different from a lamp in one key way: the oil or tallow only melts as it gets close to the flame, and this liquid is kept in the hollow part, which stays solid and forms a sort of cup. Therefore, the wick shouldn’t be too thin; if it is, it won’t draw up the melted material quickly enough, causing it to drip down the sides of the candle. Since this issue arises from the melting nature of the tallow, it’s clear that a more meltable candle needs a larger wick, while a wax candle can have a thinner wick. The flame of a tallow candle will typically be yellow, smoky, and dim, except for right after snuffing. When a candle with a thick wick is first lit and the wick is trimmed short, the flame is bright and clear, unless the wick is very large; in that case, there might be a dark area in the middle where the flame struggles for air. As the wick gets longer, the distance between its tip and the top of the flame decreases, which means that the tallow flowing from the tip has less space to ignite completely and ends up escaping as smoke. This problem worsens until the tip of the wick sticks out beyond the flame, leading to a buildup of soot from incomplete combustion, which holds its shape until the flame drops low enough for the outside air to reach it. However, even then, the necessary combustion to snuff it out doesn’t happen; the amount of tallow released by the long wick is too much to be fully burned and also absorbs a lot of the flame’s heat while turning into vapor. Due to this reduced combustion and the increased flow of partially burned oil, a layer of soot collects on the top of the wick, gradually building up until it looks like a fungus. The candle then produces only about one-tenth of the light that could come from properly burning its materials, which is why tallow candles need frequent snuffing. If we look at a wax candle, we see that while its wick also gets longer, the light does decrease. However, because the wick is thin and flexible, it doesn’t stay in the center of the flame for long; even when it does, it doesn’t widen the flame’s diameter enough to prevent air from reaching the inner part. When it gets too long, it bends to one side, and its end, exposed to the air, burns away; except for the part protected by the constantly flowing melted wax, which vaporizes and is completely burned by the surrounding flame. Thus, it seems that the difficulty of melting wax makes it possible to burn a large amount of liquid with a small wick, and that this small wick, by bending to one side due to its flexibility, effectively snuffs itself out much better than mechanical means could. From this, it is clear that the goal of making tallow candles comparable to wax ones doesn’t depend on the flammability of the materials but on a mechanical advantage in the cup, provided by the lower melting point of the wax. To achieve this important goal, one of the following must happen: either burn the tallow in a lamp to prevent the gradual march of the flame up the wick; or find a way for the candle to snuff itself, like a wax candle does; or chemically alter the tallow to make it less fusible. This is an important issue that deserves thorough investigation from a commercial perspective. Chemists generally think that the hardness or lower fusibility of wax comes from oxygen. Mr. Nicholson, on various grounds, believes that the spontaneous snuffing of candles made from tallow or other meltable materials will unlikely happen without discovering a material for the wick that is large enough to soak up the tallow yet flexible enough to bend to one side.
METHOD
OF
ASCERTAINING THE ILLUMINATING POWER
OF
CANDLES, LAMPS, GAS-LIGHTS,
AND
OTHER LUMINOUS BODIES.
Though the eye is not fitted to judge of the proportional force of different lights, it can distinguish, in many cases with great precision, when two similar surfaces, presented together, are equally illuminated. But as the lucid particles are darted in right lines, they must spread uniformly, and hence their density will diminish in the duplicate ratio of their distance. From the respective situations, therefore, of the centres of divergency, when the contrasted surfaces become equally bright, we may easily compute their relative degrees of intensity.
Though the eye isn't equipped to accurately judge the relative strength of different lights, it can often distinguish with great precision when two similar surfaces, shown together, are equally lit. Since light particles travel in straight lines, they must spread out evenly, causing their density to decrease in direct proportion to their distance. From the positions of the centers of divergence, when the contrasted surfaces appear equally bright, we can easily calculate their relative intensities.
For this purpose it is assumed as a principle, that the same quantity of light, diverging in[23] all directions from a luminous body, remains undiminished in all distances from the centre of divergency. Thus we must suppose, that the quantity of light falling on every body, is the same as would have fallen on the places occupied by the shadow; and if there were any doubt of the truth of the supposition, it might be confirmed by some simple experiment. Therefore, it follows, that, since the shadow of a square inch of any surface occupies at twice the distance of the surface from the luminous point the space of four square inches, the intensity of the light diminishes as the square of the distance increases. If, consequently, we remove two sources of light to such distances from an object that they may illuminate it in equal degrees, we may conclude that their original intensities are inversely as the squares of the distances.
For this purpose, it is assumed as a principle that the same amount of light, spreading out in[23] all directions from a light source, stays the same at every distance from the center of divergence. Thus, we must assume that the amount of light hitting each object is the same as what would have reached the areas occupied by the shadow; and if there were any doubt about the accuracy of this assumption, it could be confirmed through a simple experiment. Therefore, it follows that, since the shadow of a square inch of any surface covers an area of four square inches when it’s twice the distance from the light source, the intensity of the light decreases as the square of the distance increases. If we move two light sources to distances from an object such that they illuminate it equally, we can conclude that their original intensities are inversely proportional to the squares of the distances.
Hence, if two lights of unequal illuminating powers shine upon the same surface at equal obliquities, and an opake body be interposed between them and the illuminated surface, the two shadows produced, must differ in blackness or intensity in the same degree. For the shadow formed by intercepting the[24] greater light, will be illuminated by the smaller light only, and reversely the other shadow will be illuminated by the greater light: that is to say, the stronger light will be attended with the deeper shadow. Now it is easy, by removing the stronger light to a greater distance, to render the shadow which it produces at the common surface equal to that afforded by the less. Experiments of this kind may be conveniently made by fastening a sheet of white paper against the wall of a room; the two lights, of whatever nature they are, intended to be compared, must then be placed so that the ray of light from each shall fall with nearly the same angle of incidence upon the middle of the paper. In this situation, if a book or other object be held to intercept part of the light which would have fallen on the paper, the two shadows may be made to appear as in this figure;
So, if two lights with different brightness levels shine on the same surface at similar angles, and an opaque object blocks the light between them and the illuminated surface, the resulting two shadows will differ in darkness or intensity proportionally. The shadow created by blocking the brighter light will only be lit by the dimmer light, and vice versa, meaning the stronger light will create a darker shadow. It's easy to adjust the position of the stronger light further away to make its shadow match the one created by the weaker light. You can conveniently do this experiment by attaching a sheet of white paper to a wall in a room; the two lights, no matter what kind, should be arranged so that their rays hit the center of the paper at almost the same angle. In this setup, if you hold a book or another object to block some of the light from reaching the paper, you can create the two shadows as shown in this figure;

where A represents the surface illuminated by one of the lights only; B, the surface illuminated by the other light; C, the perfect shadow from which both lights are excluded. It will easily be understood that the lights about D and E, near the angle F, will fall with equal incidences when the double shadow is made to occupy the middle of the paper; and consequently, if one or both of the lights be removed directly towards or from the paper, as the appearances may require, until the two shadows at E and D have the same intensity, the quantities of light emitted by each will be as the squares of the distances from the paper. By some experiments made in this way, the degree of illumination of different lights may readily be ascertained to the tenth part of the whole. And, by experiments of this kind, many useful particulars may be shewn. For, since the cost and duration of candles, and the consumption of oil in lamps, are easily ascertainable, it may be shewn whether more or less light is obtained at the same expence during a given time, by burning a number of small candles instead of one or more of greater thickness. It will therefore[26] be easy to compare the power of different kinds of lamps or candles, or gas lights, so as to determine the relative cost of each particular kind of the combustible substance employed for furnishing light:—for example, if a candle and a gas-burner supplying coal-gas, adjusted by a stop-cock, produce the same darkness of shadow, at the same distance from the wall, the strength or intensity of light is the same. An uniform degree of intensity of the gas-light may readily be produced, by opening or shutting the stop-cock, if more or less be required, and the candle is carefully snuffed to produce the most regular and greatest quantity of light. The size of the flame in experiments of this kind of course becomes unnecessary, and will vary very much with the quality of the coal gas. The bulk of the gas consumed, and the quantity of tallow used, by weighing the candle before and after the experiment, furnish the data for ascertaining the relative costs of tallow and gas-light, when compared with each other.
where A represents the surface lit by one of the lights only; B is the surface lit by the other light; C is the perfect shadow that doesn't get any light from either. It's easy to see that the lights around points D and E, near angle F, will hit the paper at the same angle when the double shadow is in the middle of the paper. Therefore, if one or both of the lights are moved directly towards or away from the paper, as needed, until the shadows at E and D have the same brightness, the amount of light emitted by each will be proportional to the square of their distances from the paper. By conducting some experiments this way, you can quickly find out how bright different lights are down to the tenth of the total brightness. Additionally, experiments like this can reveal many useful details. Since the cost and lifespan of candles and the amount of oil used in lamps are easy to calculate, you can figure out whether you get more or less light for the same cost over a certain time by burning several small candles instead of one or more larger ones. This makes it straightforward to compare the power of different lamps or candles, or gas lights, to determine the relative cost of each type of fuel used to produce light. For example, if a candle and a gas burner using coal gas, adjusted with a stop-cock, create the same darkness of shadow at the same distance from the wall, their light intensity is equivalent. A consistent intensity of gas-light can be achieved by adjusting the stop-cock if more or less light is needed, while ensuring the candle is properly trimmed to produce the brightest and most even light. The size of the flame in these experiments is less important and will vary a lot depending on the quality of the coal gas. The amount of gas used and the quantity of tallow consumed can be measured by weighing the candle before and after the experiment, providing the necessary information to compare the relative costs of tallow and gas-light against each other.
From experiments made by Count Rumford, concerning the quantity of materials requisite for producing a light of a certain intensity for[27] a given time: it was found that we must burn of wax 100, of tallow 101, of oil, in an Argand’s lamp, 129, of an ill-snuffed tallow candle 229 parts, by weight. And with regard to the quantity of carburetted hydrogen, or coal-gas, I have found that from 18 to 20 cubic feet (according to the purity of the gas) are required to give a light equal in duration and in illuminating powers to 1lb. of tallow candles, six to the pound, provided they were set up and burnt out one after another.[4]
From experiments conducted by Count Rumford on the amount of materials needed to produce a certain intensity of light for[27] a specific time, it was found that you need to burn 100 parts of wax, 101 parts of tallow, 129 parts of oil in an Argand lamp, and 229 parts of a poorly snuffed tallow candle, by weight. Regarding the amount of hydrogen carbon, or coal gas, I discovered that you need between 18 to 20 cubic feet (depending on the purity of the gas) to provide light with a duration and illuminating power equivalent to 1 lb. of tallow candles, six to the pound, assuming they were lit and extinguished one after the other.[4]
FURTHER ILLUSTRATIONS
OF THE
METHOD OF CALCULATING THE RELATIVE COST OR VALUE
OF
LIGHT,
SENT BY MEANS OF
CANDLES, LAMPS, & OTHER BODIES.
It is sufficiently known that the light of a candle, which is so exceedingly brilliant when first snuffed, is very speedily diminished to[28] one-half and is usually not more than one-fifth or one-sixth before the uneasiness of the eye induces us to snuff it.[5] Whence it follows, that if candles could be made so as not to require snuffing, the average quantity of light afforded by the same quantity of combustible matter would be more than doubled.
It’s well known that the light from a candle, which is super bright right after it’s snuffed, quickly reduces to about half and often goes down to around one-fifth or one-sixth before our eyes start to feel uncomfortable and we need to snuff it again.[5] This means that if candles could be designed to not need snuffing, the average amount of light produced from the same amount of fuel would more than double.
When a lighted candle is so placed as neither to require snuffing or produce smoke, it is reasonable to conclude that the whole of the combustible matter which is consumed is converted to the purpose of generating light; and that the intensities of light afforded in a given time, by candles of different dimensions, are in proportion to the quantity of matter consumed. That is to say; when candles are made of the same materials, if one candle produce twice as much light as another, the former will in the same time lose twice as much weight as the latter.
When a lit candle is positioned in such a way that it doesn’t need trimming or create smoke, it’s fair to say that all the wax being burned is used to create light. The amount of light produced over a certain period by candles of different sizes is proportional to how much wax is consumed. In other words, if two candles are made from the same materials and one candle gives off twice the light of the other, then the first candle will also lose twice as much weight as the second in the same amount of time.
To prove the truth of this position, Mr. Walker made the experiments contained in the following
To prove the accuracy of this claim, Mr. Walker conducted the experiments outlined in the following
TABLE.
Table.
No. of the Experi- ment. |
No. of the Candles. |
Time of burning. |
Weight of the Candles consumed in a given time. |
Strength of Light. |
Distance of the Candles from the Wall. |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
h. | oz. | dr. | Feet. | ||||||||||
1 | - | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 7 | |||||
3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1⁄2 | 1 | + | 7 | |||||
Mould | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 7 | |||||||
2 | - | 1 | 2 | 55 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 8 | |||||
3 | 2 | 55 | 1 | 0 | 1 | + | 8 | ||||||
Mould | 2 | 55 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 8 | |||||||
3 | - | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 3⁄4 | 1 | 8 | ||||
3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1⁄8 | 8 | 3⁄4 | |||||
Mould | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | |||||||
4 | - | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | .18 | 8 | 3⁄4 | |||
Mould | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1⁄8 | 1 | . | 8 | |||||
These experiments, Mr. Walker informs us, were made in the following manner:—
These experiments, Mr. Walker tells us, were conducted in the following way:—
Three candles, the dimensions of which are given in the table, against 1, 3, and mould. These were first weighed, and then lighted at the same instant. At the end of the time inserted in the third column of the above table, they were extinguished and weighed again,[30] and the loss of weight of each candle is contained in the fourth column.
Three candles, the sizes of which are listed in the table, were tested against 1, 3, and mold. They were first weighed and then lit at the same time. After the duration specified in the third column of the above table, they were put out and weighed again,[30] and the weight loss of each candle is shown in the fourth column.
The three first experiments were made under such favourable circumstance, that there was little doubt of their results being more accurate than what practical utility requires, but the fourth experiment cannot be depended on so much, in consequence of the variable light of No. 5. This candle was moved so often to keep the two shadows equal, that it was found necessary to set down its mean distance from the wall by estimation; but as this was done before the candles were weighed, the experimenter’s mind could not be under the influence of partiality for a system.
The first three experiments were conducted under such favorable conditions that their results were likely more accurate than what practical use demands. However, the fourth experiment can't be relied on as much due to the fluctuating light from No. 5. This candle was moved so frequently to keep the two shadows even that it became necessary to estimate its average distance from the wall; since this was done before weighing the candles, the experimenter's judgment wasn't swayed by favoritism toward a particular system.
The method which Mr. Walker employed in comparing one light with another in each experiment, was that which has been described page 24.
The method Mr. Walker used to compare one light to another in each experiment was the one described page 24.
1. The experiments were made at different times, and the light of the mould candle was made the standard, with which the lights of the others were compared; but it must not be understood, that this candle gave the same strength of light in every experiment.
1. The experiments were conducted at different times, and the light from the mold candle was used as the standard to compare the lights of the others; however, it should not be assumed that this candle produced the same level of brightness in every experiment.
2. The sign + in the 5th column, signifies[31] that the candle against which it is placed, gave a stronger light than the others.
2. The sign + in the 5th column indicates[31] that the candle it's next to gave off a stronger light than the others.
From the experiments contained in the table, it appears to be an established law, where combustion is complete, that the quantities of light produced by tallow candles, are in the complicate ratio of their times of burning and weights of matter consumed.
From the experiments shown in the table, it seems to be an established rule that when combustion is complete, the amount of light produced by tallow candles is in a complex ratio to their burning time and the weight of the material consumed.
For if their quantities of matter be equal, and times of burning the same, they will give equal quantities of light, by the experiments.
For if their amounts of matter are equal, and the burn times are the same, they will produce equal amounts of light, according to the experiments.
And if the times of burning be equal, the quantities of light will be directly as their weights of matter expended.
And if the burning times are the same, the amounts of light produced will be directly proportional to the weights of the material used.
Therefore the light is universally in the compound ratio of the time of burning and weight of matter consumed.
Therefore, the light is generally proportional to the time it burns and the amount of material used.
If the law which Mr. Walker has endeavoured to prove, both by reason and experiment, be admitted, we have a standard with which we may compare the strength of any other light.
If the law that Mr. Walker has tried to demonstrate, through both reasoning and experimentation, is accepted, we have a benchmark to compare the strength of any other light.
Let a small mould candle, when lighted, be so placed as neither to produce smoke nor require snuffing, and it will lose an ounce of its weight in three hours. Let this quantity[32] of light produced under these circumstances, be represented by 1.00.
Let a small mold candle, when lit, be positioned so that it neither smokes nor needs trimming, and it will lose an ounce of its weight in three hours. Let this amount[32] of light produced under these conditions be represented by 1.00.
Then should this candle at any other time, lose more or less of its weight in three hours than an ounce, the quantity of light will be still known, because the quantity of light in a given time is directly as the weight of the candle consumed.[6]
Then, if this candle loses more or less than an ounce of its weight in three hours at any other time, the amount of light will still be determined, because the amount of light over a certain period is directly proportional to the weight of the candle that's burned. [6]
[6] To investigate rules for this purpose, 1. Let M represent the mould candle, a its distance from the wall, on which the shadows were compared, x its quantity of matter consumed in a given time, (t) and Q the quantity of light emitted by M in the same time: 2. Let m represent any other candle, b its distance from the same wall, and y its quantity of matter consumed, in the time t.
[6] To explore the rules for this purpose, 1. Let M be the candle in the mold, a its distance from the wall where the shadows were compared, x the amount of material it uses over a certain time, (t), and Q the amount of light emitted by M in that same time: 2. Let m be any other candle, b its distance from the same wall, and y the amount of material it consumes in the time t.
Then as the intensities of light are directly as the squares of the distances of the two candles from the wall, we have as a2 : Q ∷:: b2 : b2 + Qa2 = the quantity of light, emitted by m in the time.
Then, since the intensity of light is proportional to the squares of the distances of the two candles from the wall, we can express it as a2 : Q ∷:: b2 : b2 + Qa2 = the amount of light emitted by m over time.
Then let us suppose that the quantities of light are directly as the quantities of matter consumed in the time t, and we have, As x : Q ∷:: y : y + Qx = the quantity of light emitted by m in that time, by hypothesis.
Then let's assume that the amount of light is directly proportional to the amount of matter consumed in the time t, and we have, As x : Q ∷Understood. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize. y : y + Qx = the amount of light emitted by m in that time, based on our assumption.
Now, when b2 + Qa2 (Theo. 1.) is = Y + QX (Theo. 2.) the quantities of light of M and m are directly as their quantities of matter consumed in any given time.
Now, when b2 + Qa2 (Theo. 1.) is equal to Y + Q / X (Theo. 2.), the amounts of light produced by M and m are directly proportional to the amounts of matter they consume over any given time.
METHOD
GROWING
THE LIGHT OF TALLOW CANDLES,
AND TO AVOID THE
NECESSITY OF SNUFFING THEM.
Mr. Ezekiel Walker has shewn that, if a trifling alteration be made in the method of using common tallow candles, they will become excellent substitutes for those of wax.
Mr. Ezekiel Walker has shown that if a small change is made in the way we use regular tallow candles, they can be great substitutes for wax candles.
A common candle, weighing one-tenth of a pound, containing fourteen single threads of fine cotton, placed so as to form an angle of 30 degrees[7] with the perpendicular, and lighted, requires no snuffing; and what is much more valuable for some purposes, it gives a light that is nearly uniform in strength without the least smoke. These effects are thus produced:
A regular candle, weighing a tenth of a pound, containing fourteen single strands of fine cotton, positioned at a 30-degree angle with the vertical, and lit, doesn’t need to be snuffed; and what’s even more useful for some purposes is that it provides a light that is almost consistently strong without producing any smoke. Here’s how these effects are achieved:
When a candle burns in an inclined position, most part of the flame rises perpendicularly from the upper side of the wick, and when viewed in a certain direction, it appears in the form of an obtuse angled triangle. And as the end of the wick projects beyond the flame at the obtuse angle, it meets with the air, and is completely burnt to ashes: hence it is rendered incapable of acting as a conductor to carry off part of the combustible matter in the form of smoke. By this spontaneous mode of snuffing, that part of the wick which is acted upon by the flame continues of the same length, and the flame itself very nearly of the same strength and magnitude[8].
When a candle burns at an angle, most of the flame rises straight up from the top of the wick, and when you look at it from a particular angle, it looks like an obtuse triangle. Since the end of the wick sticks out beyond the flame at that obtuse angle, it comes into contact with air and burns completely to ashes: this prevents it from acting as a conductor to carry away any combustible material in the form of smoke. Through this natural process of self-snuffing, the part of the wick that is affected by the flame remains the same length, and the flame itself stays almost the same strength and size[8].
The advantages which may be derived from candles that require no snuffing and afford no smoke, may be readily understood; but these candles have another property which ought not to be passed over in silence. A candle snuffed by an instrument gives a very fluctuating light, which, in viewing near objects is highly injurious to the eye; and this is an[35] inconvenience which no shade can remove. But when a candle is snuffed spontaneously, it gives a light so perfectly steady and so uniformly bright, that the adjustments of the eye remain at rest, and distinct vision is performed without pain, and without uneasiness.
The benefits of candles that don’t need to be snuffed and produce no smoke are easy to see; however, these candles have another important feature that shouldn’t be overlooked. A candle that is snuffed with a tool gives off a very flickering light, which can be harmful to the eyes when looking at nearby objects; this is a problem that no shade can fix. But when a candle snuffs itself, it emits a light that is completely steady and consistently bright, allowing the eyes to remain relaxed, enabling clear vision without discomfort or strain.
Candles, on which Mr. Walker has made experiments, are described in the following
Candles that Mr. Walker has experimented with are described in the following
TABLE.
Table.
No. | No. of candles to the pound avoir- dupoise weight. |
Length in inches. |
No. of single threads of fine cotton in the wick. |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 14 | 8. | 5 | 10 |
2 | 13 | 9. | 12 | |
3 | 10 | 9. | 74 | 14 |
4 | 8 | 10. | 20 | |
5 | 6 | 10. | 25 | 24 |
Mould | 6 | 13. |
Number 1, 2, and 3. These candles, when lighted and placed to form an angle of 30° with the perpendicular, require no snuffing: they give lights which are nearly equal, and combustion proceeds so regularly, that no part of the melted tallow escapes unconsumed, except from accidental causes.
Number 1, 2, and 3. These candles, when lit and positioned to create a 30° angle with the vertical, don’t need snuffing: they produce nearly equal light, and the burning is so consistent that no portion of the melted tallow goes unburned, except for accidental reasons.
No. 4, placed at the angle mentioned above, and lighted, requires no snuffing: it gives a[36] light very little stronger than No. 1, but its colour is not quite so white, nor its flame so steady.
No. 4, positioned at the previously mentioned angle, and lit, doesn't need snuffing: it provides a[36] light that’s slightly stronger than No. 1, but its color isn’t quite as white and its flame isn’t as steady.
No. 5. This candle, placed at an angle of 30°, and lighted, requires no snuffing; its flame is rather fluctuating, and not so white as No. 4, nor is its strength of light much greater than No. 1. The melted tallow sometimes overflows when the air in the room is put in motion; yet the light of this candle is much improved by being placed in an inclined position.
No. 5. This candle, set at a 30° angle and lit, doesn't need to be snuffed; its flame is somewhat unsteady and not as bright as No. 4, nor is its light much stronger than No. 1. The melted tallow can sometimes spill over when the air in the room is stirred; however, the light from this candle improves significantly when it's tilted.
The mould candle, treated in the same manner, affords a very pure steady flame, without smoke and without snuffing, and its strength of light is about equal to that of No. 1.
The mold candle, handled the same way, gives off a very clean, steady flame, with no smoke and no need for trimming, and its brightness is roughly the same as that of No. 1.
The experiments have not been sufficiently numerous to determine with precision which of these candles affords the most light at a given expence, but the few experiments which have been made seem to indicate, that the quantity of light is nearly as the quantity of combustible matter consumed, and thus a candle which is used in the manner pointed out gives more light than a candle of the same dimension set perpendicularly and snuffed,[37] because one part of a candle that is snuffed, is thrown away, and another part flies off in the form of smoke. And this is not the only inconvenience that attends the using candles in this manner, and which the other method is free from, for the light which it gives is of a bad quality, on account of its being variable and undulating.
The experiments haven't been numerous enough to accurately determine which of these candles provides the most light for a given cost, but the few tests that have been conducted suggest that the amount of light is roughly proportional to the amount of wax consumed. Therefore, a candle used the way described gives more light than a candle of the same size lit upright and trimmed,[37] because when a candle is trimmed, part of it is wasted, and another part turns into smoke. Additionally, this method of using candles has other disadvantages that the alternative method does not have, as the light it produces is of poor quality due to being inconsistent and flickering.
From the time that a candle is snuffed till it wants snuffing again, its strength of light scarcely continues the same for a single minute. And that variation which frequently takes place in the height of the flame, is a matter of still more serious consequence.
From the moment a candle is extinguished until it needs to be snuffed out again, its light barely stays the same for even a minute. The changes in the height of the flame are even more significant.
The flame of a long candle placed vertically when it is snuffed burns steadily, is about two inches high, but it very frequently rises to the height of four inches or upwards; drops down again in a moment, till it is less than three inches, and then rises again. In this manner the flame continues in motion for some time before it returns to its original dimensions. But it does not continue long in a quiescent state before it begins a new series of undulations. In this manner the candle burns till the top of the wick is seen near the apex of[38] the flame, carrying off clouds of smoke. In this state of things the eye becomes uneasy for want of light, and the snuffers are applied to remove the inconvenience.
The flame of a long candle placed upright, when it's extinguished, burns steadily and is about two inches high, but it often rises to four inches or more; it then drops down again for a moment, going below three inches, and then rises once more. This back-and-forth movement of the flame continues for a while before it goes back to its original size. However, it doesn't stay calm for long before it starts a new cycle of flickering. The candle burns in this way until the tip of the wick is seen near the top of[38] the flame, releasing clouds of smoke. At this point, the eye becomes restless for lack of light, prompting the use of snuffers to eliminate the problem.
Mr. Walker further observes, that it is these sudden changes, and not the nature of candle-light itself, that do so much injury to the eye of the student and artist; and that that injury may be easily prevented, by laying aside the snuffers, and in the place of one large candle, let two small ones be used in the manner stated.
Mr. Walker further notes that it's these sudden changes, not the nature of candlelight itself, that harm the eyes of students and artists so much; and that this damage can easily be avoided by putting aside the snuffers and using two small candles instead of one large one, as mentioned.
The following observations on this subject are copied from the Monthly Magazine, 1805, p. 206.
The following observations on this subject are taken from the Monthly Magazine, 1805, p. 206.
“It is scarcely necessary to observe, that the combustion of candles proceeds the quicker in proportion as the inclination is greater. From the experiments which I have made, I should consider an angle of forty degrees with the perpendicular as the maximum of inclination, beyond which several considerable inconveniencies would occur; and I should take 25 degrees as the minimum of inclination, less than which does not sufficiently expose the point of the wick to the action of the air.
“It’s hardly worth mentioning that the burning of candles happens faster the more they are tilted. Based on the experiments I've conducted, I would say that an angle of forty degrees from vertical is the maximum tilt, beyond which several significant issues could arise; and I would consider 25 degrees as the minimum tilt, since anything less doesn’t sufficiently expose the wick to the air.”
“By those who are much in the habit of reading or writing by candle-light, it will also be esteemed no inconsiderable addition to the advantages already mentioned, that the trouble of seeking and applying the snuffers is superseded. A candle of common size in a vertical position, requires the application of the snuffers forty-five times during its complete consumption.
“Those who often read or write by candlelight will consider it a significant benefit, in addition to the advantages already mentioned, that they won’t have to worry about searching for and using snuffers. A standard candle in an upright position needs the snuffers to be used forty-five times throughout its entire burn time.”
“But I found an obstacle to the adoption of Mr. Walker’s plan, which, from the inclined position of the candle, it did not immediately occur to me by what means to counteract. Any agitation of the air of the room, occasioned either by the opening or shutting of a door, or by the quick passage of a person near the candle, caused the melted tallow to run over, or, in more familiar language, caused the candle to gutter; which, with the candle in this position, became an insuperable bar to the use of it.
“But I found an obstacle to adopting Mr. Walker's plan, and from the tilted position of the candle, I couldn't immediately figure out how to fix it. Any movement of the air in the room, whether from opening or closing a door or someone passing by quickly, caused the melted wax to spill over, or, in simpler terms, made the candle drip. With the candle in this position, that became an impossible problem to overcome.”
“For the prevention of this inconvenience, I have had a wire skeleton-shade adapted to a rod bearing the same inclination as the candle, and which at bottom joins the candlestick in an horizontal line of about two inches, terminating[40] in a nozzle fitting that of the candlestick.—The distance of this rod from the candlestick, or, which is the same thing, the length of the foot or horizontal line, is of course to be determined by the distance between the two circles which form the upper and lower apertures of the shade.—It may serve, perhaps, more familiarly to describe this part of the apparatus, to state, that it bears a perfect resemblance to the two first strokes of the written figure 4; and the third stroke, if carried up as high as the first, and made sloping instead of upright, will very well represent the situation of the candle.
“To prevent this issue, I’ve created a wire frame for a lampshade that attaches to a rod angled like the candle, which at the bottom aligns with the candlestick in a horizontal line of about two inches, ending in a fitting that matches the candlestick. The distance of this rod from the candlestick, or in other words, the length of the foot or horizontal line, will be determined by the space between the two circles that make up the top and bottom openings of the shade. To explain this part of the setup in a more familiar way, it looks just like the first two lines of the written number 4; and if the third line is drawn up to the same height as the first but slanted instead of straight, it nicely represents the position of the candle.[40]”
“When a strong light, for the purposes of reading or writing, be required, a white silk or paper may be used, as is common, over the skeleton; but when it be required that the light should be dispersed over the room, a glass of a similar shape may be adopted, for the purpose of preventing the flame from being influenced by any agitation of the air of the room. If the upper circle of the shade be four inches in diameter, the apex of the flame will be within it during more than half the time of the complete consumption of the candle; the shade[41] will not, therefore, require adjusting for the purpose of preventing injury to the silk, or whatever else may be used over the skeleton, more than once during that time.
“When a strong light is needed for reading or writing, a white silk or paper can be used over the frame, as is common. But if the light needs to be spread out over the room, a glass of a similar shape can be used to stop the flame from being affected by any drafts in the room. If the top circle of the shade is four inches in diameter, the tip of the flame will stay within it for more than half the time it takes for the candle to burn down completely. Therefore, the shade[41] won’t need to be adjusted to prevent damage to the silk or whatever else is used over the frame more than once during that time."
“Being myself much averse to the interruptions which a candle used in a vertical position occasions, and which, though short, may, under some circumstances, be highly vexatious, I wish to extend to others a benefit which I prize rather highly.”
“Since I really dislike the interruptions caused by a candle when it’s used upright, which, although brief, can be quite annoying in certain situations, I want to offer others a benefit that I value a lot.”
Lord Stanhope[9] has published a simple method of manufacturing candles, which, according to his Lordship’s statement, is superior to the method usually employed. The principles upon which the process depends are the following:—First, the wick of the candle is to have only three-fourths of the usual number of cotton threads, if the candle be of wax or spermaceti; and only two-thirds of the usual number, if the candle be of tallow. Secondly, it is required that the wick in all cases be perfectly free from moisture, a circumstance seldom attended to in the manufacturing of candles; and thirdly, to deprive the wick of wax[42] candles, of all the air which is entangled in its fibres, and this may conveniently be done, by boiling it in melted wax, till no more air bubbles, or froth appear on the surface of the fluid.
Lord Stanhope[9] has published a straightforward method for making candles that, according to him, is better than the usual technique. The process is based on the following principles: First, the wick of the candle should have only three-fourths of the usual number of cotton threads for wax or spermaceti candles, and only two-thirds for tallow candles. Second, the wick must be completely dry, which is often overlooked in candle-making. Third, to remove all the air trapped in the fibers of the wick of wax candles, it should be boiled in melted wax until no more air bubbles or froth appear on the surface of the liquid.[42]
If these circumstances be attended to, three candles of any size thus prepared, last as long as four of the same size manufactured in the common way. The light which they afford is superior and more steady than the light of common candles; and lastly, candles made in this manner, whether of wax, spermaceti, or tallow, do not require to be snuffed as often. Besides all this, they flame much less, and are consequently better for writing, reading, working and drawing, than candles made by the common method.
If you pay attention to these details, three candles prepared this way last as long as four of the same size made in the usual way. The light they give off is better and steadier than that of regular candles. Plus, candles made in this manner, whether from wax, spermaceti, or tallow, don’t need to be snuffed as often. On top of that, they flicker much less, making them more suitable for writing, reading, working, and drawing than candles made by the standard method.
The following observations will enable any person who is willing to try the candles manufactured according to Lord Stanhope’s plan, to ascertain the real value of the improvements suggested by his Lordship. It shews also the result of some experiments, made to ascertain the expence of burning oil in lamps with wicks of various sizes.
The following observations will help anyone who is willing to try the candles made according to Lord Stanhope’s plan to determine the true value of the improvements suggested by his Lordship. It also shows the results of some experiments conducted to determine the cost of burning oil in lamps with wicks of different sizes.
A taper lamp, with eight threads of cotton, will consume in one hour 225⁄1000 oz. of spermaceti oil: at six shillings per gallon, the expence of burning twelve hours is 13.71 farthings.
A taper lamp, with eight threads of cotton, will use in one hour 225/1000 oz. of spermaceti oil: at six shillings per gallon, the cost of burning for twelve hours is 13.71 farthings.
At seven shillings, it is 15.995 farthings.
At seven shillings, it's 15.995 farthings.
At eight shillings, it is 18.280 farthings.
At eight shillings, it is 18,280 farthings.
N. B. This gives as good a light as tallow candles of eight and ten in the pound. This lamp seldom wants snuffing, and casts a steady and strong light.
N. B. This provides light comparable to tallow candles weighing eight and ten to the pound. This lamp rarely needs to be trimmed and gives off a steady and bright light.
A taper, chamber, or watch lamp, with four ordinary threads of cotton in the wick, consumes 1.664 oz. of spermaceti oil in one hour: the oil at seven shillings per gallon, the expence of burning twelve hours, 7.02 farthings.
A taper, chamber, or watch lamp, with four regular cotton threads in the wick, uses 1.664 oz. of spermaceti oil in one hour: the oil costing seven shillings per gallon means that burning it for twelve hours costs 7.02 farthings.
At eight shillings, it is 8.022 farthings.
At eight shillings, that's 8.022 farthings.
At nine shillings, it is 9.024 farthings.
At nine shillings, that’s 9.024 farthings.
TABLE,
TABLE,
Exhibiting a series of experiments, made with a view to determine the real and comparative expence of burning candles of different sorts and sizes.
Exhibiting a series of experiments aimed at determining the actual and comparative cost of burning candles of various types and sizes.
Number of candles in one pound. |
Weight of one candle. |
Time one candle lasted. |
The time that one pound will last. |
The expence in twelve hours when candles are at 12s. per dozen, which also shews the proportion of expence at any price, per dozen. |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oz. | Dr. | Hr. | Min. | Hr. | Min. | Farthings and hundredth parts. |
|||||
A small wick. A large wick. |
18 | 3⁄4 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 15 | 59 | 26 | 9 | .70 | |
19 | 0 | 13 | 1⁄2 | 2 | 40 | 50 | 34 | 11 | .40 | ||
16 | 1⁄2 | 0 | 15 | 1⁄2 | 2 | 40 | 44 | 2 | 13 | .08 | |
12 | 1 | 5 | 1⁄4 | 3 | 27 | 41 | 24 | 13 | .92 | ||
10 | 3⁄4 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 36 | 38 | 24 | 15 | .00 | ||
7 | 3⁄4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 32 | 12 | 17 | .88 | ||
8 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 34 | 0 | 16 | .94 | |||
5 | 3⁄4 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 19 | 30 | 15 | 19 | .06 | ||
Mould candles. |
Moulds at 14d. per dozen. |
||||||||||
Each. | |||||||||||
With wax’d wick. |
3 | 7⁄8 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 20 | 42 | 39 | 15 | .74 | |
4 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 36 | 20 | 18 | .56 | |||
3 | 5 | 2 | 3⁄4 | 17 | 30 | 52 | 30 | 16 | .825 |
The time each candle lasted, was taken from an average of several trials on each size.
The time each candle burned was based on the average from multiple tests for each size.
It has been suggested by Dr. Franklin, that the flame of two candles joined, gives a much stronger light than both of them separately. The same, has been observed by Mr. Warren, to be the case with flames of gas-lights, which,[45] when combined, give a much stronger light than they would afford, when in a separate state.
Dr. Franklin has suggested that when two candles are joined, they produce a much stronger light than when they are alone. Mr. Warren has also noted that the same is true for gas lights; when combined, they emit a much stronger light than they do individually. [45]
Indeed, in all cases, where flames for producing light are placed near to each other, it is always beneficial to preserve the heat of the flame as much as possible. One of the most simple methods of doing this, is no doubt, the placing of the several flames together, and as near as possible to each other without touching, in order that they may mutually cover and defend each other against the powerful cooling influence of the surrounding cold bodies. This principle is now employed in the Liverpool lamp, which acts by several flat or ribband wicks placed in the form of a cylinder. The power of illumination of this lamp is superior in effect and more economical than any other lamp in use—and as flame is perfectly transparent to the light of another flame which passes through it, there is no danger of loss of light on account of the flames covering each other.
In all situations where light-producing flames are positioned close to one another, it's always helpful to keep the heat of the flame as preserved as possible. One of the simplest ways to achieve this is by placing several flames together, as close as possible without touching, so they can shield and protect each other from the strong cooling effects of the surrounding cold objects. This principle is currently utilized in the Liverpool lamp, which uses multiple flat or ribbon wicks arranged in a cylindrical shape. The illumination power of this lamp is more effective and economical than any other lamp available—and since flame is completely transparent to the light of another flame that passes through it, there's no risk of losing light due to the flames covering each other.
PART II.
GAS-LIGHT.
PRELIMINARY OBSERVATION.
A new art of procuring artificial light, which consists in burning the gazeous fluid obtained by distillation from common pit-coal, has of late engaged the attention of the public, under the name of gas-light.
A new way of producing artificial light, which involves burning the gas obtained by distilling regular coal, has recently caught the public's interest, known as gas-light.
The encouragement that has been given for some years past by the legislature to this system of lighting, has induced certain individuals to apply the coal-gas light for the illumination of streets, houses, roads, and public edifices. And it is sufficiently known that a company has been incorporated by charter under the name of the “Gas Light and Coke Company,” to apply this new art of procuring light, by[48] way of experiment, on a large scale, in lighting the streets of the metropolis.[10]
The support that the government has provided for this lighting system over the past few years has led some people to use coal-gas lighting for illuminating streets, homes, roads, and public buildings. It's well-known that a company has been established by charter under the name of the “Gas Light and Coke Company” to experiment with this new method of generating light on a large scale in the streets of the city.[48][10]
[10] An Act for granting certain powers and authorities to a company to be incorporated by charter, called the “Gas Light and Coke Company,” for making inflammable air for the lighting of the streets of the metropolis, &c.—Session 1810, 50th Geo. III.
[10] An Act to grant specific powers and authorities to a company that will be formed by charter, known as the “Gas Light and Coke Company,” to produce gas for lighting the streets of the city, etc.—Session 1810, 50th Geo. III.
The power and authorities granted to this corporate body are very restricted and moderate. The individuals composing it have no exclusive privilege; their charter does not prevent other persons from entering into competition with them. Their operations are confined to the metropolis where they are bound to furnish not only a stronger and better light to such streets and parishes as chuse to be lighted with gas, but also at a cheaper price than shall be paid for lighting the said streets with oil in the usual manner. The corporation is not permitted to traffic in machinery for manufacturing or conveying the gas into private houses, their capital or joint stock is limited to 200,000l. and His Majesty has the power of declaring the gas-light charter void, if the company fail to fulfil the terms of it.
The powers and authorities granted to this corporate body are quite limited and moderate. The individuals involved have no exclusive rights; their charter does not stop others from competing with them. Their activities are restricted to the city, where they must provide a stronger and better light for any streets and areas that choose to be lit with gas, but also at a lower price than what would be paid for illuminating those streets with oil as usual. The corporation is not allowed to deal in machinery for manufacturing or supplying gas to private homes, their capital or joint stock is capped at £200,000, and the King has the authority to revoke the gas-light charter if the company fails to meet its terms.
THEORY
OF
THE COMBUSTION OF COAL
IN
CLARIFICATION OF THE NATURE AND PRODUCTION
OF
GAS LIGHT.
Pit-coal exists in this island in strata, which, as far as concerns many hundred generations after us, may be pronounced inexhaustible; and is so admirably adapted, both for domestic purposes and the uses of the arts, that it is justly regarded as a most essential constituent of our national wealth. Like all other bituminous substances, it is composed of a fixed carbonaceous base or bitumen, united to more or less earthy and saline matter constituting the ashes left behind when this substance is burnt. The proportions of these parts differ considerably, in different kinds of coal; and according to the prevalency of one or other of them, so the coal is more or less combustible, and possesses the characters of[50] perfect pit-coal; and by various shades, passes from the most inflammable canel-coal, into blind, Kilkenny, or stone-coal; and, lastly, into a variety of earthy or stony substances; which, although they are inflammable, do not merit the appellation of coal.
Pit coal is found in layers on this island, which, for many generations to come, can be considered limitless; and it is so well-suited for both home use and industrial applications that it is rightly seen as a vital part of our national wealth. Like all other types of coal, it consists of a stable carbon base or bitumen, mixed with varying amounts of earthy and salty materials that make up the ashes left after burning. The ratios of these components vary significantly among different coal types; based on the dominance of one or the other, the coal becomes more or less flammable and exhibits the characteristics of[50] high-quality pit coal. It ranges from the highly flammable cannel coal to blind, Kilkenny, or stone coal, and ultimately to various earthy or rocky materials, which, while they can catch fire, do not qualify as true coal.
Every body knows that when pit-coals are burning in our grates, a flame more or less luminous issues from them, and that they frequently emit beautiful streams of flame remarkably bright. But besides the flame, which is a peculiar gas in the state of combustion, heat expels from coal an aqueous vapour, loaded with several kinds of ammoniacal salts, a thick viscid fluid resembling tar, and some gases that are not of a combustible nature. The consequence of which is, that the flame of a coal-fire is continually wavering and changing, both in shape, as well as brilliance and in colour, so that what one moment gave a beautiful bright light, in the next, perhaps, is obscured by a stream of thick smoke.
Everyone knows that when coal is burning in our fireplaces, it produces a flame that varies in brightness, and it often sends out beautiful, bright streams of fire. But in addition to the flame, which is a specific gas in the process of combustion, heat causes coal to release water vapor, filled with different types of ammoniacal salts, a thick, sticky liquid similar to tar, and some gases that aren’t flammable. As a result, the flame of a coal fire is constantly flickering and changing, both in form and in brightness and color, so that what one moment might cast a lovely, bright light can, in the next, be overshadowed by a wave of thick smoke.
But if coals, instead of being suffered to burn in this way, are submitted to distillation in close vessels, all its immediate constituent parts may be collected. The bituminous part[51] is melted out in the form of tar. There is disengaged at the same time, a large quantity of an aqueous fluid, contaminated with a portion of oil, and various ammoniacal salts. A large quantity of carburetted hidrogen, and other uninflammable gases, make their appearance, and the fixed base of the coal remains behind in the distillatory apparatus in the form of a carbonaceous substance, called coke.
But if coal is distilled in closed vessels instead of being allowed to burn, all its immediate components can be collected. The bituminous part[51] is melted out as tar. At the same time, a large amount of a watery fluid, mixed with some oil and various ammonium salts, is released. A significant amount of hydrocarbon gases and other non-flammable gases are produced, and the solid part of the coal is left behind in the distillation apparatus as a carbon-rich substance called coke.
All these products may be separately collected in different vessels. The carburetted hidrogen, or coal-gas, may be freed from the non-inflammable gases, and afterwards forced in streams out of small appertures, which, when lighted, may serve as the flame of a candle to illuminate a room or any other place. It is thus, that from pit-coal a native production of this country, we may procure a pure, lasting, and copious light; which, in other cases, must be derived from expensive materials, in part imported from abroad.
All these products can be collected separately in different containers. The carburetted hydrogen, or coal gas, can be separated from the non-flammable gases and then pushed out in streams through small openings, which, when lit, can act like a candle flame to light up a room or any other space. This way, from pit coal, a natural resource of this country, we can get a pure, long-lasting, and abundant light; whereas, in other instances, light must come from costly materials, some of which are imported from overseas.
It is chiefly upon the power of collecting the products afforded by coal, with convenience and cheapness, that the promoters of the gas-light illumination found their claims to public encouragement. They conceive that the flame[52] which pit-coal yields, as it is now consumed, is turned to very little advantage: it is not only confined to one place, where a red heat is more wanted than a brilliant flame, but it is obscured, and sometimes entirely smothered, by the quantity of incombustible materials that ascend along with it and pollute the atmosphere.
The main reason the supporters of gas lighting sought public support was because of the ability to gather the benefits provided by coal in a convenient and affordable way. They believe that the flame[52] produced by coal is not utilized effectively; it’s not only restricted to one area where a strong heat is more needed than a bright flame, but it is also dimmed and sometimes completely overshadowed by the large amount of non-combustible materials that rise with it and pollute the air.
That much inflammable matter is thus lost, is evident from facts that come under our daily observation. We often see a flame suddenly burst from the densest smoke, and as suddenly disappear; and if a light be applied to the little jets that issue from the bituminous parts of the coal, they will catch fire, and burn with a bright flame. A considerable quantity of a gazeous fluid, capable of affording light and heat continually escapes up the chimney, whilst another part is occasionally ignited, and exhibits the phenomena of the flame and light of the fire.
A lot of flammable material gets wasted, as we can see in our daily lives. We often witness a flame suddenly erupting from thick smoke, only to vanish just as quickly. If we bring a light to the small jets that come from the oily parts of the coal, they'll ignite and burn with a bright flame. A significant amount of a gas that can provide light and heat continually escapes up the chimney, while another portion occasionally ignites, showing the effects of the fire's flame and light.
The theory of the production of gas-light is therefore analogous to the action of a lamp or candle. The wick of a candle being surrounded by the flame, is in the same situation of the pit-coal exposed to distillation. The office of the wick is chiefly to convey tallow, by capillary[53] attraction, to the place of combustion. As it is decomposed into carburetted hidrogen gas it is consumed and flies off, another portion succeeds; and in this way a continued current of tallow and maintenance of flame are effected. See page 15.
The process of producing gas light is similar to how a lamp or candle works. The wick of a candle, surrounded by the flame, is in the same position as the coal being distilled. The wick's main job is to transport the wax, using capillary[53] action, to the burning area. As it breaks down into combustible hydrogen gas, it gets consumed and evaporates, while another portion takes its place. This creates a continuous flow of wax and maintains the flame. See page 15.
The combustion of oil by means of a lamp depends on similar circumstances. The tubes formed by the wick serve the same office as a retort placed in a heated furnace through which the inflammable liquid is transmitted. The oil is drawn up into these ignited tubes, and is decomposed into carburetted hidrogen gas, and from the combustion of this gas the illumination proceeds. See p. 15. What then does the gas-light system attempt? Nothing more than to generate, by means of sufficient furnaces and a reservoir of sufficient capacity, desired quantities of the gas, which is the same material of the flame of candles or lamps; and then by passing it through pipes to any desired distance, to exhibit it there at the mouths of the conducting tubes, so that it may be ignited for any desired purpose. The only difference between this process and that of an ordinary candle or lamp, consists in having the furnace[54] at the manufactory, instead of its being in the wick of the candle or lamp—in having the inflammable material distilled at the station, instead of its present exhibitions in oil, wax, or tallow, and then in transmitting the gas to any required distance, and igniting it at the orifice of the conducting pipe instead of igniting it at the apex of the wick. The principle is rational, and justified by the universal mode in which all light is produced. Indeed, this discovery ranks among the numerous recent applications of chemical science to the purposes of life, which promise to be of the most general utility.
The burning of oil in a lamp works under similar conditions. The tubes formed by the wick act like a retort in a heated furnace that transmits the flammable liquid. The oil is pulled into these lit tubes and breaks down into hydrogen gas, and the light comes from the combustion of this gas. See p. 15. So, what does the gas-light system aim to do? It simply tries to produce, with enough furnaces and a large enough reservoir, the desired amounts of gas, which is the same substance that fuels the flame of candles or lamps. Then, it passes this gas through pipes to any location, allowing it to be ignited at the end of the pipes for whatever purpose is needed. The only difference between this method and that of a regular candle or lamp is that the furnace is at the production site instead of being in the wick of the candle or lamp. It distills the flammable material at the facility instead of showcasing it in oil, wax, or tallow, and it sends the gas to the necessary distance, igniting it at the outlet of the pipe instead of at the tip of the wick. The principle makes sense and is supported by the universal way in which all light is generated. In fact, this discovery is one of many recent applications of chemical science for practical purposes, which are expected to be widely beneficial.
It is evident from the outline here given of the production and application of coal-gas, that all the uses of pit-coal are not exhausted; it will be sufficient to observe, that the complete analysis of coal, which has been hitherto confined to the laboratory of the chemist, requiring skill and nicety in the operator, and attended with great trouble and expence, is now so far simplified, that many chaldrons of coals may be decomposed by one gas-light apparatus in the space of six hours, and all the component parts produced in their most useful[55] shape, at an expence out of all proportion below the value of the products.
It’s clear from the outline provided about the production and use of coal gas that we haven't tapped into all the potential applications of pit coal. It's worth noting that the complete analysis of coal, which previously took place only in a chemist's lab and required a skilled operator and a lot of effort and cost, has now been simplified to the point where several chaldrons of coal can be broken down with one gas light apparatus in just six hours, yielding all the useful components at a cost that’s significantly lower than the value of the products. [55]
SKETCH
OF
THE RISE AND PROGRESS
OF THE
DISCOVERY AND APPLICATION
OF
COAL-GAS,
INSTEAD OF BUYING
ARTIFICIAL LIGHT.
To assist the reader in comprehending the nature and object of substituting coal-gas for tallow or oil, for the purpose of obtaining light, it may be proper to touch slightly upon the successive discoveries that have been made as to the decomposition of coal, and the application of its different ingredients. Such a sketch will add to the many examples that occur in the history of science and art, showing the slow progress of mankind in following up known principles, or extracting from acknowledged facts every possible advantage.
To help the reader understand the reason for replacing tallow or oil with coal gas for lighting, it’s worth briefly mentioning the discoveries made regarding the decomposition of coal and the use of its various components. This overview will contribute to the many examples found in the history of science and art that illustrate the gradual advancement of humanity in pursuing established principles and maximizing the benefits from recognized facts.
In the Philosophical Transactions of the[56] Royal Society, V. XLI. so long ago as the year 1739, is recorded a paper, exhibiting an account of some experiments made by Dr. James Clayton, from which it appears that the inflammable nature of coal-gas was then already known. Dr. Clayton having distilled Newcastle coal, obtained, as products of the process, an aqueous fluid, a black oil, and an inflammable gas, which he caught in bladders, and by pricking these he was enabled to inflame the gas at pleasure.
In the Philosophical Transactions of the[56] Royal Society, V. XLI, dated back to 1739, there’s a paper documenting experiments conducted by Dr. James Clayton. The findings show that the flammable nature of coal gas was already understood at that time. Dr. Clayton distilled Newcastle coal and ended up with an aqueous liquid, a black oil, and a flammable gas, which he stored in bladders. By pricking these bladders, he could ignite the gas whenever he wanted.
It is further known, that in the beginning of the last century, Dr. Hales[11] on submitting pit-coal to a chemical examination, found, that during the ignition of this fossil in close vessels, nearly one-third of the coal became volatilized in the form of an inflammable vapour. Hence the discovery of the inflammable nature of coal-gas can no longer be claimed by any person now living.
It is also known that at the start of the last century, Dr. Hales[11] conducted a chemical examination of pit-coal and found that when this fossil was ignited in sealed containers, nearly one-third of the coal turned into an inflammable vapor. Therefore, the discovery of the flammable nature of coal gas can no longer be credited to anyone currently alive.
[11] Vegetab. Statics, vol. I.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Veg. Statics, vol. I.
In the year 1767, the Bishop of Llandaff[12] examined the nature of the vapour and gazeous products evolved during the distillation of pit-coal. This learned philosopher noticed, that[57] the volatile product is not only inflammable as it issues from the distillatory vessel, but that it also retained its inflammability after having been made to pass through water, and suffered to ascend through two high curved tubes. The solid matters obtained by this venerable prelate, were, an aqueous ammoniacal fluid, a tenaceous oil, resembling tar, an ammoniacal liquor, and a spongy coal, or coke.
In 1767, the Bishop of Llandaff[12] studied the nature of the vapor and gaseous products released during the distillation of pit coal. This knowledgeable scholar observed that[57] the volatile product is not only flammable as it comes out of the distillation vessel, but it also retained its flammability after passing through water and rising through two high curved tubes. The solid materials obtained by this esteemed bishop included an ammoniacal aqueous fluid, a thick oil that resembled tar, an ammoniacal liquid, and a spongy coal, or coke.
[12] Watson’s Chemical Essays, vol. II.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Watson’s Chemical Essays, vol. II.
The first discovery and application of the use of coal-gas for the purpose of illumination is claimed by Mr. Murdoch.
The first discovery and use of coal gas for lighting is credited to Mr. Murdoch.
Dr. W. Henry of Manchester, has published the following account[13] of this discovery.
Dr. W. Henry from Manchester has published the following account[13] of this discovery.
“In the year 1792, at which time Mr. Murdoch resided at Redruth, in Cornwall, he commenced a series of experiments upon the quantity and quality of the gases contained in different substances. In the course of these he remarked, that the gas obtained by distillation from coal, peat, wood, and other inflammable substances, burnt with great brilliancy upon being set fire to; and it occurred to him, that by confining and conducting it[58] through tubes, it might be employed as an economical substitute for lamps and candles. The distillation was performed in iron retorts, and the gas conducted through tinned iron and copper tubes to the distance of 70 feet. At this termination, as well as at intermediate points, the gas was set fire to, as it passed through apertures of different diameters and forms, purposely varied with a view of ascertaining which would answer best. In some the gas issued through a number of small holes like the head of a watering pan; in others it was thrown out in thin long sheets; and again in others in circular ones, upon the principle of Argand’s lamp. Bags of leather and of varnished silk, bladders, and vessels of tinned iron, were filled with the gas, which was set fire to, and carried about from room to room, with a view of ascertaining how far it could be made to answer the purpose of a moveable or transferable light. Trials were likewise made of the different quantities and qualities of gas produced by coals of various descriptions, such as the Swansea, Haverfordwest, Newcastle, Shropshire, Staffordshire, and some kinds of Scotch coals.
"In 1792, when Mr. Murdoch was living in Redruth, Cornwall, he began a series of experiments to examine the quantity and quality of gases found in different substances. During these experiments, he noticed that the gas produced by distilling coal, peat, wood, and other flammable materials burned very brightly when ignited. He realized that by confining and directing it through tubes, it could be used as an economical alternative to lamps and candles. The distillation took place in iron retorts, and the gas was channeled through tinned iron and copper tubes over a distance of 70 feet. At the end of this distance, as well as at various points along the way, the gas was ignited as it flowed through openings of different sizes and shapes, which were intentionally varied to see which worked best. In some instances, the gas came out through several small holes like the head of a watering can; in others, it exited in thin, long sheets; and in yet others, it came out in circular patterns, similar to the design of Argand’s lamp. Leather and varnished silk bags, bladders, and containers made of tinned iron were filled with the gas, which was then ignited and carried from room to room to test how well it could serve as a portable or transferable light source. They also experimented with the various quantities and qualities of gas produced by different types of coal, including Swansea, Haverfordwest, Newcastle, Shropshire, Staffordshire, and some types of Scottish coal."
“Mr. Murdoch’s constant occupations prevented his giving farther attention to the subject at that time; but he again availed himself of a moment of leisure to repeat his experiments upon coal and peat at Old Cumnock, in Ayrshire, in 1797; and it may be proper to notice that both these, and the former ones, were exhibited to numerous spectators, who, if necessary, can attest them. In 1798, he constructed an apparatus at Soho Foundry, which was applied during many successive nights to the lighting of the building; when the experiments upon different apertures were repeated and extended upon a large scale. Various methods were also practised of washing and purifying the air, to get rid of the smoke and smell. These experiments were continued, with occasional interruptions, until the epoch of the peace in the spring of 1802, when the illumination of the Soho manufactory afforded an opportunity of making a public display of the new lights; and they were made to constitute a principal feature in that exhibition.”
Mr. Murdoch’s busy schedule kept him from focusing on the subject at that time; however, he took advantage of some free time to repeat his experiments with coal and peat at Old Cumnock, in Ayrshire, in 1797. It's worth noting that both these experiments and the earlier ones were shown to many spectators who can confirm them if needed. In 1798, he built a device at Soho Foundry, which was used over several nights to light the building, where the experiments on different openings were repeated and expanded on a large scale. Various methods were also tried for washing and purifying the air to eliminate smoke and odor. These experiments continued, with occasional breaks, until the peace in the spring of 1802, when the lighting of the Soho manufactory provided an opportunity for a public display of the new lights, making them a key feature of that exhibition.
In the year 1803 and 1804, Mr. Winsor exhibited at the Lyceum in London the general[60] nature of this new mode of illumination though the machinery for procuring, and the manner of purifying the gas, he kept a secret. He exhibited the mode of conducting the gas through the house, and a number of devices for chandeliers, lamps, and burners, by which it might be applied. Among these he proposed long flexible tubes suspended from the ceiling, or wall of the room, and at the end communicating with burners or lamps of different kinds. This gentleman showed also by experiment, that the flame of the gas-light, produced no smoke; that it was not so dangerous as the flame of candles or lamps; that it could not produce sparks; and that it was not so readily extinguished by gusts of wind or torrents of rain.
In 1803 and 1804, Mr. Winsor showcased the overall[60] concept of this new type of lighting at the Lyceum in London, although he kept the machinery for producing and purifying the gas a secret. He demonstrated how to pipe the gas throughout a building, along with various designs for chandeliers, lamps, and burners to use it. Among these, he suggested using long, flexible tubes hung from the ceiling or walls of the room that connected to different types of burners or lamps. He also experimentally proved that gas light produced no smoke, was less dangerous than candle or lamp flames, didn’t create sparks, and was not as easily blown out by wind or heavy rain.
Mr. Winsor’s display of gas-lights took place more than two years before Mr. Murdoch’s priority of right was heard of.
Mr. Winsor’s showcase of gas lights happened over two years before anyone heard about Mr. Murdoch’s claim to priority.
In stating these facts I do not mean to say that Mr. Murdoch derived the hint of applying the coal-gas from the previous exhibition of Mr. Winsor, because it is quite within the bounds of probability that the ideas of Mr.[61] Murdoch may have arisen totally independent of all acquaintance with Mr. Winsor’s.
In sharing these facts, I want to clarify that Mr. Murdoch did not necessarily get the idea of using coal gas from Mr. Winsor's earlier exhibition. It’s entirely possible that Mr. Murdoch's ideas came about completely independently, without any knowledge of Mr. Winsor.
The claims of invention, or the determination of the right of priority, concerns the public only so far as the honour and estimation of any useful discovery conferred on the inventor may induce other individuals to devote their talents to similar pursuits; by means of which, more discoveries may be made, and the subject of human invention become extended, or rendered more useful. For as the mere benefits which mankind may derive from any particular discovery, they are certainly more indebted to the person who first applied the discovery to actual practice, than to him who first made it, and merely illustrated it by barren experiments. Mr. Winsor certainly pressed on the mind of the public with unremitted perseverance and diligence the extensive application of gas-light in the year 1802, but he made no new discovery with regard to the composition of coal; he did not even invent the mode of conducting the gas through tubes; and if he has pointed out the particulars of the process, he has made a very important, though not the most brilliant improvement in this line of business. Mr.[62] Winsor’s publications are, perhaps, but ill adapted to promote his cause; and the exaggerated calculation which the sanguine mind of a discoverer is naturally disposed to indulge in, have, to superficial observers, thrown an air of ridicule and improbability on the whole scheme of lighting with gas.
The claims of invention, or determining who has priority, only matter to the public in that the recognition and respect given to a useful discovery can inspire others to use their skills for similar projects. This leads to more discoveries, expanding human invention and making it more useful. While the benefits that society gains from any one discovery are evident, people owe more to the individual who first put that discovery into practice than to the person who merely made it known through unsuccessful experiments. Mr. Winsor definitely impressed upon the public the broad application of gas lighting in 1802 with his relentless dedication and effort, but he didn’t make any new discoveries about coal composition; he didn’t even invent the method of transporting gas through tubes. Even if he has detailed the process, he introduced a significant yet not the most remarkable improvement in this field. Mr. Winsor’s writings may not effectively support his cause, and the exaggerated expectations that a hopeful inventor often has can make his entire gas lighting plan seem ridiculous and unlikely to those who take a cursory look.
It may, however, be safely affirmed, that if the same facts had come forward, under the sanction of some great name in the chemical or philosophical world, the public incredulity would long since have been subdued; and the plan, which for many years has been struggling for existence, would have been eagerly adopted as a national object.
It can be confidently stated that if the same facts had been presented with the endorsement of a prominent figure in the fields of chemistry or philosophy, public skepticism would have been overcome long ago; and the plan, which has been trying to gain traction for many years, would have been enthusiastically embraced as a national priority.
On the 18th of May, 1804, Mr. Frederick Albert Winsor, took out a patent for combining the saving and purifying of the inflammable gas (for producing light and heat), the ammonia, tar, and other products of pit-coal, with the manufacture of a superior kind of coke (see Repertory, 2d Series, v. 172). And, lately, the same gentleman has taken out a second patent, for further improvements in these processes.
On May 18, 1804, Mr. Frederick Albert Winsor received a patent for combining the saving and purifying of flammable gas (used for producing light and heat), ammonia, tar, and other products from coal, with the production of a higher quality coke (see Repertory, 2d Series, v. 172). Recently, the same gentleman has obtained a second patent for additional improvements in these processes.
In the year 1805, Mr. Northern, of Leeds,[63] also directed the attention of the public to the application of coal-gas, as a substitute for tallow light, as will be seen by the following extract of the Monthly Magazine for April, 1805.
In 1805, Mr. North from Leeds,[63] also brought public attention to using coal gas as a replacement for tallow lights, as shown in the following excerpt from the Monthly Magazine for April 1805.
“I distilled in a retort, 50 ounces of pit-coal in a red heat, which gave 6 ounces of a liquid matter covered with oil, more or less fluid as the heat was increased or diminished. About 26 ounces of cinder remained in the retort; the rest came over in the form of air, as it was collected in the pneumatic apparatus. I mixed part of it with atmospherical air, and fired it with the electric spark with a tolerable explosion, which proves it to be hydrogene.—Whether any of the other gases were mixed with it, I did not then determine. In the receiver I found a fluid of an acid taste, with a great quantity of oil, and, at the bottom, a substance resembling tar.
“I heated 50 ounces of pit coal in a retort until it was red hot, which produced 6 ounces of a liquid covered with oil, varying in fluidity as I adjusted the heat. About 26 ounces of cinder remained in the retort; the rest escaped as gas, collected in the pneumatic apparatus. I mixed some of it with atmospheric air and ignited it with an electric spark, resulting in a noticeable explosion, confirming it to be hydrogen. I couldn’t determine if any other gases were present at that time. In the receiver, I found a fluid with an acidic taste, a lot of oil, and a substance resembling tar at the bottom.”
“The apparatus I make use of for producing light is a refiner’s crucible, the top of which (after filling with coal) I close with a metal cover, luted with clay or other luting, so as to prevent the escape of the gas; a metal pipe is soldered into the cover, bent so as to[64] come under the shelf in the pneumatic trough, over which I place a jar with a stop-cock and a small tube; the jar being previously filled with water, the crucible I place on the common or other fire as is most convenient; and as the heat increases in it, the gas is forced rapidly through the water into the jar, and regularly displaces it. I then open the cock and put fire to the gas, which makes its escape through the small tube, and immediately a most beautiful flame ensues, perfectly free from smoke or smell of any kind. A larger light, but not so vivid or clear, will be produced without passing the gas through water, but attended with a smoke somewhat greater than that of a lamp charged with common oil.
The device I use to produce light is a refiner’s crucible, the top of which I close with a metal cover after filling it with coal, sealing it with clay or another adhesive to stop the gas from escaping. A metal pipe is soldered into the cover, bent to come under the shelf in the pneumatic trough, where I place a jar with a stopcock and a small tube; the jar is filled with water beforehand. I set the crucible on a common fire or any other heat source that’s convenient, and as the heat increases, the gas is quickly forced through the water into the jar, displacing it regularly. I then open the stopcock and ignite the gas, which escapes through the small tube, creating a beautiful flame that is completely free from smoke or any odor. A larger light can be produced without passing the gas through water, but it will emit slightly more smoke than a lamp filled with regular oil.
“I have great hopes that some active mechanic or chemist will, in the end, hit on a plan to produce light for large factories, and other purposes, at a much less expence, by the above or similar means, than is at present produced from oil.”
“I really hope that some innovative mechanic or chemist will eventually come up with a way to create light for big factories and other uses, at a much lower cost, using the methods mentioned above or something similar, than what we currently get from oil.”
Since that time, the application of gas-light has spread rapidly, and numerous manufactories and other establishments have been lighted by coal-gas.
Since then, the use of gas lighting has grown quickly, and many factories and other businesses have been lit by coal gas.
In France, the application of gas-lights to economical purposes, was pointed out long before it was publicly introduced into this country. M. Le Bon had a house fitted up in Paris, in the winter of 1802, so as to be entirely illuminated by gas-lights, which was seen by thousands with admiration; and had a brevet d’invention (patent) granted to him by the French government, for the art of producing light from wood, ignited in close vessels.
In France, the use of gas lights for practical purposes was recognized long before it was introduced to this country. M. Le Bon had a house set up in Paris, during the winter of 1802, to be completely illuminated by gas lights, which thousands admired. He also received a brevet d’invention (patent) from the French government for the method of producing light from wood burned in sealed containers.
Many other attempts have been made to derive advantage from the different ingredients of coal; but they are too obscure to merit particular enumeration.
Many other efforts have been made to take advantage of the various components of coal, but they are too unclear to be worth listing individually.
In the year 1808, Mr. Murdoch presented to the Royal Society his account of the application of gas-light, and was complimented with Count Romford’s medal for the same.
In 1808, Mr. Murdoch presented to the Royal Society his report on the use of gas lighting and was awarded Count Romford’s medal for it.
The following statement is taken from Mr. Murdoch’s paper.
The following statement is taken from Mr. Murdoch’s paper.
“The whole of the rooms of the cotton mill of Mr. Lee, at Manchester, which is I believe the most extensive in the United Kingdom, as well as its counting-houses and store-rooms, and the adjacent dwelling house of Mr. Lee, are lighted with the gas from coal. The total quantity of light used during the hours of burning has been ascertained, by a comparison of shadows, (see page 23) to be about equal to the light which 2500 mould candles, of six to the pound, would give; each of the candles with which the comparison was made consuming at the rate of 4-10ths of an ounce (175 grains) of tallow per hour.
“The entire area of Mr. Lee's cotton mill in Manchester, which I believe is the largest in the United Kingdom, along with its offices and storage rooms, and the nearby residence of Mr. Lee, is illuminated by gas derived from coal. The total amount of light used during burning hours has been determined, through a comparison of shadows, (see page 23) to be roughly equivalent to the light produced by 2500 mold candles, weighing six to the pound; each candle in this comparison burns at a rate of 4-10ths of an ounce (175 grains) of tallow per hour.”
“The gas-burners are of two kinds: the one is upon the principle of the Argand lamp, and resembles it in appearance; the other is a small curved tube with a conical end, having three circular apertures or perforations, of about a thirtieth of an inch in diameter, one at the point of the cone, and two lateral ones, through which the gas issues, forming three divergent jets of flame, somewhat like a fleur-de-lis. The shape and general appearance of this tube has procured it, among the workmen, the name of the cockspur burner.
“The gas burners come in two types: one works on the principle of the Argand lamp and looks similar to it; the other is a small curved tube with a pointed end that has three circular openings about a thirtieth of an inch in diameter—one at the tip of the cone and two on the sides—through which the gas flows, creating three outward jets of flame, resembling a fleur-de-lis. The design and overall look of this tube have earned it the nickname 'cockspur burner' among the workers.”
“The number of burners employed in all the buildings amounts to 271 Argand, and 653 cockspurs, each of the former giving a light equal to that of four candles of the description above-mentioned; and each of the latter a light equal to two and a quarter of the same candles; making therefore the total of the gas-light a little more than equal to that of 2500 candles, six to the pound. When thus regulated, the whole of the above burners require an hourly supply of 1250 cubic feet of the gas produced from cannel-coal; the superior quality and quantity of the gas produced from that material having given it a decided preference in this situation over every other coal, notwithstanding its higher price.
The total number of burners used in all the buildings is 271 Argand and 653 cockspur burners. Each Argand burner provides the same light as four of the previously mentioned candles, while each cockspur gives off light equivalent to two and a quarter of those candles. This means the overall gas light output is just over 2,500 candles, based on six candles per pound. With this setup, all these burners need a supply of 1,250 cubic feet of gas generated from cannel coal every hour. The higher quality and quantity of gas produced from this material make it clearly preferable in this situation, even with its higher cost.
“The time during which the gas-light is used may, upon an average of the whole year, be stated at least at two hours per day of 24 hours. In some mills, where there is over work, it will be three hours; and in the few where night work is still continued nearly 12 hours. But taking two hours per day as the common average throughout the year, the consumption in Messrs. Philips and Lee’s mill will be 1250 × 2 = 2500 cubic feet of gas per day; to produce which 700 weight of[68] cannel-coal is required in the retort. The price of the best Wiggan cannel-coal (the sort used) is 131⁄2d. per cwt. (22s. 6d. per ton) delivered at the mill, or say about eight shillings for the seven hundred weight. Multiplying by the number of working days in the year (313,) the annual consumption of coal will be 110 tons, and its cost 125l.
“The average time the gas light is used throughout the year is about two hours a day. In some mills, where there's overtime, it can be three hours; and in a few places where night shifts are still happening, it’s nearly 12 hours. But if we take two hours a day as the general average for the year, the gas consumption in Messrs. Philips and Lee’s mill will be 1250 × 2 = 2500 cubic feet of gas each day; to produce that amount, 700 pounds of [68] cannel coal is needed in the retort. The price of the best Wiggan cannel coal (the kind used) is 131⁄2d. per hundredweight (22s. 6d. per ton) delivered at the mill, which is around eight shillings for the 700 pounds. Multiplying that by the number of working days in the year (313), the total annual coal consumption will be 110 tons, at a cost of 125l.
“About one-third of the above quantity, or say forty tons of good common coal, value ten shillings per ton, is required for fuel to heat the retorts, the annual amount of which is 20l.
“About one-third of the above quantity, or around forty tons of good common coal, worth ten shillings per ton, is needed to heat the retorts, which totals an annual amount of 20l.
“The 110 tons of cannel-coal, when distilled, produce about 70 tons of good coke, which is sold upon the spot at 1s. 4d. per cwt. and will therefore amount annually to the sum of 93l.
“The 110 tons of cannel coal, when distilled, produce about 70 tons of good coke, which is sold on-site for 1s. 4d. per cwt. and will therefore total an annual amount of 93l.
“The quantity of tar produced from each ton of cannel-coal is from 11 to 12 ale gallons, making a total annual produce of about 1250 ale gallons, which not having been yet sold, it cannot yet be determined its value.
“The amount of tar produced from each ton of cannel coal is between 11 and 12 ale gallons, resulting in a total annual production of about 1250 ale gallons. Since it hasn’t been sold yet, its value cannot be determined.”
“The interest of the capital expended in the necessary apparatus and buildings, together with what is considered as an ample allowance for wear and tear, is stated by Mr. Lee at about 550l. per annum, in which some allowance is[69] made for this apparatus being made upon a scale adequate to the supply of a still greater quantity of light, than he has occasion to make use of.
“The interest on the capital spent on the necessary equipment and buildings, along with what’s seen as a reasonable allowance for wear and tear, is estimated by Mr. Lee at around 550l. per year, factoring in some allowance for this equipment being designed to provide an even larger quantity of light than he actually needs to use.”
“Mr. Lee is of opinion that the cost of attendance upon candles would be as much, if not more, than upon the gas apparatus; so that, in forming the comparison, nothing need be stated upon that score, on either side.
“Mr. Lee believes that the cost of using candles would be just as much, if not more, than that of the gas equipment; therefore, when making the comparison, there’s no need to mention that aspect from either side.”
“The economical statement for one year, then, stands thus:
“The financial statement for one year, then, looks like this:
Cost of 110 tons of cannel coal | £ 125 |
Ditto of 40 tons of common ditto, to carbonise | 20 |
In all | 145 |
Deduct the value of 70 tons of coke | 93 |
The annual expenditure in coal, after deducting the value of the coke, and without allowing any thing for the tar, is therefore | 52 |
And the interest of capital sunk, and wear and tear of apparatus | 550 |
Making the total expence of the gas apparatus per annum, about | 600 |
“That of candles, to give the same light,[70] would be about 2000l. For each candle, consuming at the rate of 4-10ths of an ounce of tallow per hour, the 2500 candles burning, upon an average of the year, two hours per day, would, at one shilling per pound, the present price, amount to nearly the sum of money above-mentioned.
“That of candles, to provide the same light,[70] would be about 2000l. For each candle, using 4-10ths of an ounce of tallow per hour, the 2500 candles burning, on average, two hours a day throughout the year, would, at one shilling per pound, the current price, come to nearly the same amount of money mentioned above.
“If the comparison were made upon an average of three hours per day, as in most cases, would perhaps be nearer to the truth, and the tear and wear remaining nearly the same as on the former case, the whole cost would not exceed 650l. while that of the tallow would be 3000l.”
“If the comparison were based on an average of three hours per day, which is typical in most cases, it would likely be more accurate, and the wear and tear would be nearly the same as in the previous case, so the total cost wouldn't go beyond 650l. while the cost for the tallow would be 3000l.”
Mr. Ackerman in this metropolis, has shown that the art of gas-light illumination is not confined to great manufactories, but that its advantages are equally applicable to those on a moderate scale. The whole of Mr. Ackerman’s establishment, his public library, warehouse, printing-offices and work-shops, together with his dwelling house, from the kitchen to the drawing-room, has, for these four years past, been lighted with gas, to the total exclusion of all other lights. The result of the whole of this proceeding will be obvious from the following letter:
Mr. Ackerman in this city has demonstrated that gas lighting isn't just for large factories; its benefits can also be enjoyed by smaller businesses. For the past four years, every part of Mr. Ackerman’s establishment—his public library, warehouse, printing offices, and workshops, along with his home from the kitchen to the living room—has been lit entirely by gas, without using any other lighting sources. The outcome of this will be clear from the following letter:
To Mr. ACCUM.
To Mr. ACCUM.
Sir,
Sir,
“In answer to your request with regard to my gas-lights, which I now have in my house, I take this mode of informing you, that I charge two retorts with 240lbs. of coal, half cannel and half Newcastle, from which I extract 1000 cubic feet of gas. To obtain this quantity of gas, when the retorts are cold, I use from 100 to 110lb. of common coals; but when they are in a working state, that is to say, when they are once red hot, the carbonising fuel amounts to about 25lb. per retort. The bulk of gas thus obtained supplies 40 Argand’s lamps, of the large size, for four hours per night, during the long winter evenings, together with eight Argand’s lamps and about 22 single cockspur burners, for three hours per night: in addition to which my printers employ 16 cockspur burners for ten hours per day to heat their plates instead of charcoal fire. In the depth of winter we charge two retorts per day: but, upon an average, we work 365 retorts in 365 days.
“In reply to your inquiry about my gas lamps at home, I want to let you know that I fill two retorts with 240 lbs. of coal, divided equally between cannel and Newcastle, which generates 1,000 cubic feet of gas. To get this amount when the retorts are cold, I use between 100 and 110 lbs. of regular coal; however, when they’re hot and working, I only need about 25 lbs. per retort. The gas produced powers 40 large Argand lamps for four hours each night during the long winter evenings, as well as eight Argand lamps and around 22 single cockspur burners for three hours each night. My printers also use 16 cockspur burners for ten hours a day to heat their plates instead of using charcoal fires. During the coldest part of winter, we load two retorts each day, but on average, we use 365 retorts year-round.”
Now 365 retorts containing 120lb. of coal each, make 43800lb. which is equal to ten chaldrons of Newcastle and eight tons of cannel coal.
Now, 365 retorts holding 120 pounds of coal each make 43,800 pounds, which is the same as ten chaldrons of Newcastle and eight tons of cannel coal.
[15] Although cannel-coal sells at nearly double the price of Newcastle coal, I use it in preference to the latter, because it affords a larger portion of gas, and gives a much more brilliant light.
[15] Even though cannel coal is almost twice as expensive as Newcastle coal, I prefer it because it produces more gas and provides a much brighter light.
Such is the simple statement of my present system of lighting, the brilliancy of which, when contrasted with our former lights, bears the same comparison to them as a bright summer sun-shine does to a murky November day: nor are we, as formerly, almost suffocated with the effluvia of charcoal and fumes of candles and lamps. In addition to this, the damage sustained by the spilling of oil and tallow upon prints, drawings, books and paper, &c. amounted annually to upwards of 50l. All the workmen employed in my establishment consider their gas-lights as the greatest blessing; and I have only to add, that the light we now enjoy, were it to be produced by means of Argand’s lamps or candles, would cost at least 350l. per annum.
This is a simple description of my current lighting system, which is much brighter than our old lights, just like a sunny summer day stands out against a cloudy November day. We're no longer bothered by the smoke and smells from charcoal, candles, and lamps. Additionally, the damage from spilled oil and tallow on prints, drawings, books, and paper used to cost us over £50 a year. Everyone in my business sees the gas lights as a significant improvement, and it's important to mention that if we were still using Argand’s lamps or candles, the lighting costs would be at least £350 a year.
I am, with respect,
Yours,I am, respectfully,
Yours,Strand, March 13,
1815.Strand, March 13,
1815.R. ACKERMAN.”
R. ACKERMAN.”
Another manufacturer who was one of the first that adopted the use of this method of illumination in the small way, and who gave a statement of its advantages to the public, is Mr. Cook, a manufacturer of metal toys, at Birmingham, a clear-headed, prudent man, not apt to be dazzled by a fanciful speculation, but governed in his transactions by a simple balance of profit and loss. There is a naïveté in his own account of the process which will amuse as well as instruct the reader.
Another manufacturer who was among the first to use this type of lighting on a small scale and who shared its benefits with the public is Mr. Chef, a metal toy manufacturer from Birmingham. He is a clear-thinking, practical individual who isn't easily swayed by unrealistic ideas but makes decisions based on a straightforward assessment of profit and loss. His own description of the process has a certain charm that will both entertain and educate the reader.
“My apparatus is simply a small cast-iron pot, of about eight gallons, with a cast-iron cover, which I lute to it with sand. Into this pot I put my coal. I pass the gas through water into the gasometer or reservoir, which holds about 400 gallons; and, by means of old gun-barrels, convey it all round my shops. Now, from twenty or twenty-five pounds of coal, I[73] make perhaps six hundred gallons[16] of gas; for, when my reservoir is full, we are forced to burn away the overplus in waste, unless we have work to use it as it is made: but, in general, we go on making and using it, so that I cannot tell to fifty or a hundred gallons;—and, in fact, a great deal depends on the coals, some coals making much more than others. These twenty-five pounds of coal put into the retort, and say twenty-five pounds more to heat the retort, which is more than it does take one time with another, but I am willing to say the utmost, are worth four-pence per day. From this four-pence we burn eighteen or twenty lights during the winter season.”
“My setup is just a small cast-iron pot, about eight gallons, with a cast-iron cover that I seal with sand. I put my coal in this pot. I pass the gas through water into a gasometer or reservoir, which holds about 400 gallons, and then use old gun-barrels to distribute it throughout my shops. Now, from twenty or twenty-five pounds of coal, I can produce around six hundred gallons of gas; when my reservoir is full, we have to burn off the excess if we don’t have work to use it right away. In general, we keep producing and using it, so I can’t pinpoint exactly how much, maybe fifty or a hundred gallons; a lot depends on the type of coal, as some produce much more than others. These twenty-five pounds of coal in the retort, plus say twenty-five pounds more to heat the retort—though that's more than what it usually takes—are worth four pence a day. From that four pence, we burn eighteen or twenty lights during the winter season.”
Thus are the candles which Mr. Cook used to employ, and which cost him three shillings a day, entirely superseded. But, besides his expence in candles, oil and cotton for soldering, used to cost him full 30l. a year; which is entirely saved, as he now does all his soldering by the gas flame only. For “in all trades in which the blow-pipe is used with oil[74] and cotton, or where charcoal is employed to produce a moderate heat, the gas flame will be found much superior, both as to quickness and neatness in the work: the flame is sharper, and is constantly ready for use; while, with oil and cotton or charcoal, the workman is always obliged to wait for his lamp or coal getting up; that is, till it is sufficiently on fire to do his work. Thus, a great quantity of oil is always burned away useless; but, with the gas, the moment the stop-cock is turned, the lamp is ready, and not a moment is lost.” We must refer to Mr. Cook’s letter for the details of expence, which he gives with faithful minuteness, and always leaning to the side unfavourable to the gas. The result of the whole is, that he saves 30l. out of the 50l. which his lights formerly cost him: and, when we consider that his calculation allows the gas-lights to burn the whole year, and the candles only twenty weeks, there can be little doubt, that the savings in this case follow nearly the same proportion as in the former. If the apparatus be erected even on a smaller scale, “the saving,” Mr. Cook assures us, “will still be considerable:[75] for the poor man, who lights only six candles, or uses one lamp, if the apparatus is put up in the cheapest way possible, will find it only cost him 10l. or 12l. which he will nearly, if not quite, save the first year.”
So, the candles that Mr. Chef used to use, which cost him three shillings a day, are now completely replaced. Besides his candle expenses, oil and cotton for soldering used to cost him around 30l. a year; now he saves all that because he does all his soldering with just a gas flame. In trades that use a blowpipe with oil[74] and cotton, or where charcoal is used to create a moderate heat, the gas flame is much better, both in speed and cleanliness: the flame is sharper and is always ready to use, while with oil and cotton or charcoal, the worker has to wait for the lamp or coal to heat up; that is, until it's on fire and ready for work. A lot of oil goes wasted this way, but with gas, the moment you turn the stop-cock, the lamp is ready, and there's no time lost. We need to look at Mr. Chef’s letter for the specifics on expenses, which he details very carefully, always leaning towards the unfavorable side for gas. The bottom line is that he saves 30l. out of the 50l. his lights used to cost. Considering that his calculations assume the gas lights burn all year while the candles last only twenty weeks, it’s clear that the savings follow a similar pattern. Even if the setup is on a smaller scale, “the savings,” Mr. Cook assures us, “will still be significant:[75] for the average person who lights only six candles or uses one lamp, if the setup is done as cheaply as possible, it will only cost him about 10l. or 12l., which he will almost entirely, if not completely, save in the first year.”
Mr. Ackerman having, in this town, set the example of lighting his establishment with gas, several other individuals soon followed the attempt. The following statement will show, that this species of light may be made use of with the greatest advantage, upon a still smaller scale, where no great nicety with regard to the apparatus for procuring gas is required. The following report I have received from Messrs. Lloyd, of Queen Street, Southwark, thimble manufacturers and whitesmiths, who have used the gas-light for soldering and other purposes these five years past.
Mr. Ackerman set the example of lighting his business with gas in this town, and several others quickly followed his lead. The statement below shows that this type of lighting can be used very effectively on a smaller scale, where there's no need for a complicated setup for obtaining gas. The following report is from Messrs. Lloyd, thimble manufacturers and whitesmiths on Queen Street, Southwark, who have been using gas light for soldering and other purposes for the past five years.
From 4 pecks or 1 bushel of coals, weighing 69lbs. for which we now pay (1809) 1s. we produce 43⁄4 pecks of coke and 1⁄2 peck of coal not carbonised remains in the distilling pot, which together with the coke weighs 58lbs. 6 oz. value at 1s. per bushel | 0 | 1 | 4 |
we procure 6lbs. 4 oz. of tar which[76] we use as pith—it saves us | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 2 | 4 | |
Deduct for coal | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Profit on coke and tar | 0 | 1 | 0 |
The gas yielded by the 4 pecks of coals in the pot, make 42 brilliant lights, which burn 7 hours. To keep 42 tallow candles which were formerly used in the manufactory burning for the same time, required 7lbs. which at 1s. per lb. cost | 0 | 7 | 0 |
To this, add profits on coke and tar | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Gained out of every bushel of coal | 0 | 8 | 0 |
“The gas-burners made use of in our manufactory produce jets of flame, which in our business, where much soldering with the blow-pipe must be done, have a decided superiority over Argand’s lamps. We are not nice concerning the quality of the gas—a great part of it is burned from the gasometer, without allowing it to purify itself in the gasometer, because our gasometer is not large enough to store up the whole quantity of gas we want for use.”
“The gas burners we use in our factory produce flames that are much better for our work, especially since we do a lot of soldering with the blowpipe, compared to Argand’s lamps. We're not picky about the gas quality—most of it comes straight from the gasometer without being purified, because our gasometer isn't big enough to hold all the gas we need.”
THEORY
OF
THE PRODUCTION OF GAS-LIGHT,
AND
DESCRIPTION
OF
A PORTABLE APPARATUS
FOR SHOWING, IN A SMALL WAY, THE GENERAL
NATURE OF THIS TYPE OF LIGHT.
To obtain carburetted hidrogen, or coal-gas, from common pit-coal, and to apply it for the purposes of illumination, the coal is introduced into large iron cylinders, called retorts, to the apertures of which iron pipes are adapted, terminating in a vessel, or vessels, destined to purify and collect the gas. The retorts charged with coals and made air-tight, are placed upon the fire, the action of which extricates the gazeous products from the coals, together with an aqueous ammoniacal vapour, and a tenaceous bituminous fluid, or tar, &c. The liquid substances are conveyed into proper vessels, and the gazeous products are conducted, by means of pipes, under the gasometer, where the[78] gas is again washed, and remains ready for use. There are also other pipes leading from the gasometer, which branch out into smaller ramifications, until they terminate at the places where the lights are wanted. The extremities of the pipes have small apertures, out of which the gas issues, and the streams of gas being lighted at those apertures burn with a clear and steady flame as long as the supply of gas continues. All the pipes which come from the gasometer are furnished at their extremities with stop-cocks to regulate the admission of the gas. The burners are formed in various ways, either a tube ending with a simple orifice, at which the gas issues in a stream, and if once lighted will continue to burn with the most steady and regular light imaginable, as long as the gas is supplied; or two concentric tubes of brass, or sheet-iron, are placed at a distance of a small fraction of an inch from each other, and closed at the bottom. The gas which enters between these cylinders, when lighted, forms an Argand lamp, which is supplied by an internal and external current of air in the usual manner. Or the two concentric tubes are closed at the top with a ring having small perforations, out of[79] which the gas alone can issue, thus forming small distinct streams of light.
To get hydrogen gas, or coal gas, from regular coal and use it for lighting, the coal is placed into large iron containers called retorts. These retorts have iron pipes attached to openings that lead to a container or containers designed to purify and collect the gas. Once the retorts are filled with coal and sealed tightly, they are heated, causing the gaseous products to be released from the coal, along with ammonia vapor and a sticky tar-like liquid. The liquids are directed into appropriate containers, while the gases are funneled through pipes to a gasometer, where the gas is washed and kept ready for use. There are also other pipes coming from the gasometer that split into smaller branches, leading to the spots where lights are needed. The ends of the pipes have small openings through which the gas escapes, and when lit at these points, the gas burns with a bright and steady flame as long as the gas supply lasts. Each pipe coming from the gasometer has shut-off valves at the ends to control the flow of gas. The burners are designed in different ways: one style is a tube with a simple opening at the end, allowing the gas to flow out in a stream that, once ignited, burns steadily and brightly as long as there is gas; another design uses two concentric tubes made of brass or sheet metal, spaced just slightly apart and closed at the bottom. The gas that enters between these tubes, when lit, creates an Argand lamp, which receives air from both inside and outside as usual. Alternatively, the two concentric tubes can be closed at the top with a ring that has small holes, allowing the gas to escape and form distinct streams of light.
The gas-apparatus, plate 2, will be found very convenient for exhibiting, in the small way, the general nature of this new art of illumination, whilst at the same time it may serve to ascertain, at a trifling expence, the comparative value of different kinds of coals intended to be employed for the production of this species of light, as well as other occasional purposes connected with the gas-light system of illumination.
The gas apparatus, plate 2, will be very useful for demonstrating, in a small way, the general nature of this new form of lighting. At the same time, it can help determine, at a low cost, the relative value of different types of coal meant for producing this kind of light, as well as other occasional uses related to the gas-light system.
It consists of three distinct apparatus:—namely, a portable furnace, fig. 1, plate 2, by means of which the gas is prepared—fig. 2, a purifyer, or condenser, which separates and purifies the products obtained from the coal, so as to render the gas fit for the purpose of illumination—fig. 3, a gasometer, or reservoir for receiving and preserving the purified stock of gas, and from which it may be transferred and distributed as occasion may require. The following statement will explain more fully the general nature of this portable chamber apparatus:—a, represents a cast iron retort, such as is used for chemical operations in the small[80] way. This retort rests upon a tripod of hammered iron, placed upon the bars of the grate of the chemical furnace. Into this retort the coals are put for furnishing the gas. It is provided with a solid iron stopper ground air-tight into the mouth of the retort, and the stopper is secured in its place by an iron wedge passing over it in the centre; by means of which the mouth of the retort when charged with coal is readily made air-tight, and the stopper may easily be removed by knocking out the iron wedge. b. is a metal pipe which conveys all the distillatory products from the retort into the purifier fig. 2. This tube is bent at right angles at the extremity where it enters the intermediate vessel fig. 2. The purifier fig. 2, is divided into three compartments marked c. d. e. The first compartment is filled with water, and by means of it an air-tight communication is established with the retort which furnishes the gas. The second compartment, d, contains a solution of caustic pot-ash composed of about 2 parts of caustic pot-ash and 16 of water, or a mixture of quick-lime and water of the consistence of very thin cream. The object of this compartment is to separate the non-inflammable[81] gases and other products evolved during the distillation of the coal, from the carburetted hidrogen or coal-gas, so as to render it fit for use. The third compartment e is left empty to receive the tar and other liquid products. Into the first compartment c, all the gazeous and liquid products are delivered, as they become evolved during the distillation, by means of the pipe b. The compartment d, of the purifier, or alcali vessel, is furnished with a wide perpendicular pipe, which serves to make an air-tight communication with the retort, by allowing the tube b, to pass readily through it. From the chamber c, the liquid and gazeous products pass to the tar-chamber, or compartment e, by means of the descending pipe f. The tar and other condensible substances are therefore deposited at e, whilst the gazeous products alone ascend from the tar-chamber e, by the pipe g, and down again the pipe h, (which is closed at the top) into the compartment d, of the vessel or purifier, fig. 2. The gas being thus made to pass from the compartment e, up into the pipe g, and down the pipe h, (which is closed at the top) into the purifier d, is brought into contact with[82] the liquor in that vessel, where it is opposed to a pressure in proportion to the perpendicular height of the column of liquid which it contains. The funnel in the compartment c, is considerably higher than the purifying apparatus, it therefore allows the liquid which it contains, when pressed upon by the gas, to ascend into it, without overflowing the apparatus, and to descend again as the pressure diminishes—i is another wide-mouth funnel, by means of which the chamber d, is filled with the alcaline solution, or mixture of lime and water. The carbonic acid gas and sulphuretted hidrogen, evolved during the distillation of the coal, are thus made to combine with the alcali or lime, in the compartment d, of the purifier, forming carbonate and hidro-sulphuret of lime. The carburetted hidrogen, being left more or less pure, is conveyed through the pipe k, into the gasometer, fig. 3. The communication of the purifier, fig. 2, with the gasometer, is made by means of the well-known water-valve l, placed so that the communicating tube k, may be easily removed at pleasure—m, is a cock for drawing off the tar, &c. n, a gauge-cock for ascertaining the height of[83] the liquid in the chamber d. The gasometer, fig. 3, the object of which is to store up the gas, consists of two principal parts—namely, a large interior vessel designed to contain the gas, and an outer cistern or vessel, of rather greater capacity, in which the former is suspended, designed to contain the water by which the gas is confined. The interior vessel which contains the gas is suspended by chains or cords hung over pullies, to which weights are attached, so as to nearly equipoise it. o is a pipe, which communicates with the water-valve l, and by means of which the gas passes from the purifier, fig. 2, into the gasometer. The upper end of this pipe is covered, in the manner of a hood, by a cylindrical vessel p, open at bottom, but partially immersed beneath the surface of the water contained in the outer cistern of the gasometer, and perforated round near the lower edge with a number of small holes. The gas displaces the water from this receiver p, and escapes through the small holes, rising in bubbles through the water, so as to expose a large surface to its action, that it may be properly washed, &c. After rising through the water the gas enters[84] the gasometer, which is suspended to move up and down by the chains, pullies, and balance-weights, q. From the centre of the gasometer a tube, r, descends, which includes a pipe, s, fixed perpendicular from the bottom of the cistern. The fixed pipe r, forms a guide to keep the gasometer always perpendicular. t is also an iron pipe made fast in the centre of the inner vessel, and communicates with the upright tube, s, in the outer vessel. This contrivance obliges the gas to pass into the pipe t, whilst it also serves to keep the gasometer steady when nearly out of the outer cistern.
It consists of three distinct parts: a portable furnace, fig. 1, plate 2, used to prepare the gas—fig. 2, a purifier or condenser that separates and cleans the products from the coal to make the gas suitable for lighting—fig. 3, a gasometer or reservoir that collects and holds the purified gas, allowing it to be transported and distributed as needed. The following explanation will clarify the general structure of this portable chamber apparatus:—a represents a cast iron retort used for chemical operations on a small scale[80]. This retort sits on a tripod of hammered iron placed on the bars of the chemical furnace's grate. Coal is added to this retort to generate the gas. It is fitted with a solid iron stopper that creates an airtight seal at the mouth of the retort, secured by an iron wedge that goes over the top; this makes the mouth airtight when filled with coal, and the stopper can be easily removed by knocking out the iron wedge. b. is a metal pipe that carries all the distillatory products from the retort to the purifier fig. 2. This pipe is bent at a right angle at the end where it enters the intermediate vessel fig. 2. The purifier fig. 2 is divided into three sections marked c. d. e. The first section is filled with water, establishing an airtight connection with the retort that provides the gas. The second section, d, contains a solution of caustic potash made of about 2 parts caustic potash and 16 parts water, or a mix of quicklime and water that has the consistency of very thin cream. This section's purpose is to remove non-flammable gases and other products created during the coal's distillation, ensuring the carburetted hydrogen, or coal gas, is ready for use. The third section e is empty to collect tar and other liquid products. All gaseous and liquid products are directed into the first section c as they are produced during distillation via the pipe b. The second section, d, of the purifier, is equipped with a wide vertical pipe that enables an airtight connection with the retort, allowing the tube b to pass through it easily. From section c, the liquid and gaseous products flow into the tar chamber, or section e, through the descending pipe f. The tar and other condensible substances settle in e, while only the gaseous products move up from the tar chamber e, by the pipe g, and down the pipe h, (closed at the top) into section d of the purifier fig. 2. As the gas travels from section e up the pipe g and down pipe h (closed at the top) into section d, it contacts the liquid in that vessel, facing a pressure proportional to the height of the liquid column it contains. The funnel in section c is significantly higher than the purifying apparatus, allowing the liquid within to rise when pressed by the gas without overflowing the apparatus and to recede as the pressure drops—i is another wide-mouthed funnel used to fill section d with the alkaline solution or lime-water mix. The carbonic acid gas and hydrogen sulfide produced during the coal distillation combine with the alkali or lime in section d of the purifier, forming carbonate and hydrosulfide of lime. The carburetted hydrogen, remaining relatively pure, is sent through the pipe k into the gasometer fig. 3. The connection between the purifier fig. 2 and the gasometer is made through the well-known water valve l, designed for easy removal of the connecting tube k—m is a tap for draining the tar, etc. n is a gauge tap for checking the liquid level in section d. The gasometer fig. 3, aimed at storing the gas, consists of two main parts: a large inner vessel for the gas and an outer container that is slightly larger, holding the water that confines the gas. The inner gas-holding vessel is suspended with chains or cords over pulleys, attached to weights that balance it almost perfectly. o is a pipe connected to the water valve l, allowing gas to flow from the purifier fig. 2 into the gasometer. The top of this pipe is covered like a hood by a cylindrical vessel p, open at the bottom but partially submerged in the water of the outer gasometer vessel, and has several small holes near the lower edge. The gas displaces water from this receiver p, bubbling up through the small holes, which exposes a large surface for washing, etc. After passing through the water, the gas enters[84] the gasometer, which can move up and down with the chains, pulleys, and counterweights q. A tube r descends from the center of the gasometer, containing a vertical pipe s fixed at the bottom of the cistern. The fixed pipe r serves as a guide to keep the gasometer upright. t is another iron pipe securely fastened in the center of the inner vessel, connecting with the vertical tube s in the outer vessel. This setup forces the gas into pipe t while also stabilizing the gasometer when it is nearly out of the outer cistern.
When the operation commences, the gasometer is sunk down nearly to a level with the surface of the water in the outer cistern, and is consequently filled with water; but as the gas enters, it rises up to receive it. It is to be noted, that the balance-weights q q, should not be quite so heavy as the gasometer, in order that some pressure may be exerted, to force the gas out of the burners with a proper jet. The gas which issues from the retort enters the purifier as stated already, and ascends the pipe o, into the vessel, p, from which it displaces the water, and passes out at the small holes, as[85] before described, rising through the water into the gasometer, and raising it up: the gas then passes away to the burners, u u. In this manner the process proceeds until the whole of the volatile products of the coal in the retort is evaporated. The use of the gasometer is, to equalize the emission of the gas which comes from the retort more quickly at some time than others. When this happens, the interior vessel rises up to receive it, and when the stream from the retort diminishes, the weight of the gasometer expels its contents. When the process is finished, the retort is suffered to cool, and its ground stopper is then removed to replenish it with coal. The residue found in the retort is coke. v v are cocks to let off any liquid that may collect in the pipe o or t; for if the smallest portion of liquid were to obstruct the free passage of the gas to the burners, the consequence would be, that the lights would not burn steadily—they would, as it is called, dance, or become extinguished. x is the main stop-cock which communicates with the burners—these, of course, may be placed as convenience may require. z z are two projecting parts in the top of the gasometer;[86] they are intended to receive the hood p, and the upper extremity of the pipe t, so as to allow the gasometer to be wholly immersed into the cistern. The wheels or pullies of the gasometer have a groove to allow the links of the chain to pass freely.
When the operation starts, the gasometer is lowered almost to the same level as the water in the outer cistern, which means it fills with water; but as gas enters, it rises to accommodate it. It's important to note that the balance weights q q shouldn't be as heavy as the gasometer, so some pressure can be applied to push the gas out of the burners with an adequate jet. The gas that comes from the retort goes into the purifier as mentioned before and rises through the pipe o into the vessel p, where it displaces the water and escapes through the small holes, as[85] previously described, rising through the water into the gasometer and lifting it up. The gas then moves on to the burners u u. This process continues until all the volatile products from the coal in the retort are evaporated. The purpose of the gasometer is to stabilize the gas emission from the retort, which can be more rapid at some times than others. When this occurs, the inner vessel rises to collect it, and when the flow from the retort slows down, the weight of the gasometer pushes its contents out. After the process is complete, the retort is allowed to cool, and its ground stopper is then removed to refill it with coal. The leftover material in the retort is coke. v v are the valves used to release any liquid that might collect in pipes o or t; because if even a small amount of liquid blocks the gas from reaching the burners, the lights would not burn steadily—they would, as it's called, dance or go out. x is the main stop-cock that connects to the burners—these can be arranged as needed. z z are two protruding parts at the top of the gasometer;[86] they are designed to hold the hood p and the top end of the pipe t, allowing the gasometer to be fully submerged in the cistern. The wheels or pulleys of the gasometer have a groove to let the chain links move freely.
In this apparatus there is no provision made for the unequal pressure which the gas suffers, accordingly as the gasometer is more or less immersed in water. It will be observed that, in this apparatus, the weight of the interior vessel is constantly increasing, in proportion as it fills with gas, and rises out of the water, and consequently, if a constant, uniform, counterpoising weight, equal only to that of the gasometer in the first moment of its rise, be employed, the gas becomes gradually more and more compressed by that part of the weight of the gasometer which is not counterpoised, and if its pressure or quantity be then estimated by the bulk which it occupies, without making allowance for the increasing pressure, a material error must arise, and this, in the large way, would give rise to insurmountable difficulties with regard to the regulation[87] of the size of the flames; which could not be rendered uniform.
In this setup, there's no allowance for the uneven pressure that the gas experiences based on how deep the gasometer is in the water. It’s noticeable that in this system, the weight of the inner container keeps increasing as it fills with gas and rises out of the water. Therefore, if a steady, equal counterweight is used, only matching the weight of the gasometer at the initial moment of its rise, the gas gets increasingly compressed by the portion of the gasometer's weight that isn’t counterbalanced. If we then measure the gas's pressure or quantity based on the space it occupies without accounting for this growing pressure, we’ll encounter a significant error. This, on a larger scale, would lead to major challenges in controlling the size of the flames, which could not be made consistent.[87]
Suppose the cistern or exterior vessel full of water, and the gasometer partly filled with gas and partly with water, it is evident that the balance-weight may be so adjusted, as to occasion an exact equilibrium, so that the external air shall not tend to enter into the gasometer nor the gas to escape from it; and in this case the water will stand exactly at the same level both within the gasometer and within the outer cistern. On the contrary, if the balance-weights be diminished, the gasometer will then press downwards from its own gravity, and the water will stand lower in the gasometer than it does in the cistern; in this case, the included air or gas will suffer a degree of compression above that experienced by the external air, exactly proportioned to the weight of a column of water, equal to the difference of the external and internal surfaces of the water.
Imagine a tank or outside container full of water, and a gas holder that’s partially filled with gas and water. It's clear that if we adjust the balance weight correctly, we can create perfect equilibrium so that outside air doesn’t flow into the gas holder, and gas doesn’t escape from it. In this situation, the water will be at the same level both in the gas holder and in the outer tank. On the other hand, if we decrease the balance weight, the gas holder will press down due to its own weight, causing the water level inside the gas holder to drop below that in the tank. In this case, the air or gas inside will be compressed more than the outside air—this compression is directly related to the weight of a water column equal to the difference in height between the external and internal water surfaces.
To compensate for this increasing weight of the gasometer, and render a scale of equal graduations accurate, some have ingeniously[88] adopted the plan of a spiral pulley to the chain, which has the effect of gradually avoiding the evil, but the best way of accomplishing it will be stated hereafter.
To counteract the growing weight of the gasometer and ensure that a scale with equal divisions remains accurate, some have cleverly[88] implemented a spiral pulley for the chain. This helps to gradually mitigate the issue, but the best solution will be discussed later.
With regard to the philosophy or the production of coal-gas, it proves that pit-coal contains solid hidrogen, carbon, and oxigen. When the intensity of the heat has reached a certain degree, a part of the carbon unites with part of the oxigen and produces carbonic acid, which by means of caloric is melted into the gazeous state and forms carbonic acid gas; at the same time, part of the hidrogen of the coal combines with another portion of carbon and caloric, and forms the carburetted hidrogen gas, which varies considerably in its constitution, according to the circumstances under which it is produced; a portion of olifiant gas, carbonic oxid, hidrogen, and sulphuretted hidrogen, is also produced during the process. The quantities of these products vary according to the nature of the coal employed in the process.
Regarding the production of coal gas, it shows that pit coal contains solid hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen. When the heat reaches a certain level, some of the carbon combines with some of the oxygen to produce carbonic acid, which is then heated into a gas and forms carbonic acid gas. At the same time, some of the hydrogen from the coal combines with another portion of carbon and heat to create carburetted hydrogen gas, which varies significantly in its composition depending on the conditions under which it is produced. A portion of olefins, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and hydrogen sulfide is also produced during the process. The amounts of these products vary based on the type of coal used.
Pit-coal is not the only substance which affords carburetted hydrogen; this gazeous fluid[89] may be obtained in a great variety of ways, and with very considerable differences in specific gravity and proportion of ingredients.
Pit coal isn't the only material that produces carburetted hydrogen; this gas[89] can be generated in many different ways, with notable variations in specific gravity and ingredient proportions.
It is found plentifully native or ready formed on the surface of stagnant waters, marshes, wet ditches, &c. through which, if examined closely, large bubbles will be seen to rise in hot weather, and may be increased at pleasure by stirring the bottom or mud with a stick.
It is commonly found naturally occurring or already formed on the surface of still waters, marshes, wet ditches, etc. If you look closely, you’ll see large bubbles rising in hot weather, and you can create more by stirring the bottom or mud with a stick.
In close still evenings if a lighted candle is held over the surface, flashes of blue lambent flame may sometimes be perceived spreading to a considerable distance. All that is not fabulous concerning the ignis fatuus is probably derived from this source. This species of gas is termed for distinction the carburetted hydrogen of marshes. In the purest form in which it can be collected it is mixed with about 20 per cent. of azot or nitrogen.
In calm, quiet evenings, if you hold a lit candle above the surface, you might sometimes see blue flickering flames spreading over a considerable distance. Everything that’s not a myth about the ignis fatuus probably comes from this. This type of gas is known as the carburetted hydrogen of marshes. In its purest form, it contains about 20 percent nitrogen.
To procure the gas for the purpose of philosophical amusement, fill a wide-mouthed bottle with the water of the ditch, and keep it inverted therein with a large funnel in its neck, then with a stick stir the mud at the bottom just under the funnel, so as to cause the bubbles of air which rise from the mud to enter[90] into the bottle; when by thus stirring the mud in various places, the air may be catched in the bottle.
To get the gas for some philosophical fun, fill a wide-mouthed bottle with ditch water and keep it upside down with a large funnel stuck in the neck. Then, use a stick to stir the mud at the bottom right under the funnel, which will make air bubbles rise from the mud and enter[90] the bottle. By stirring the mud in different spots, the air can be collected in the bottle.
Carburetted hidrogen gas is also given out very abundantly by all kinds of vegetable matter when subjected to a scorching heat sufficient to decompose them. When heated in close vessels much more gas is obtained than when burnt in the open air. If moistened charcoal be put into an earthen retort and heat be applied till the retort becomes ignited; gas will be evolved, consisting partly of carbonic acid, and partly of carburetted hidrogen. A gas of similar properties is obtained by causing steam to pass through a tube filled with red-hot charcoal; by passing spirit of wine, or camphor, through red-hot tubes; by distilling oils, wood, bones, wax and tallow, or any animal or vegetable body whatever.
Carburetted hydrogen gas is also released abundantly by all types of plant matter when exposed to high heat that can break them down. When heated in closed containers, a lot more gas is produced than when burned in the open air. If you place moistened charcoal into a clay retort and heat it until the retort ignites, gas will be released, which consists partly of carbon dioxide and partly of carburetted hydrogen. A similar gas is produced by passing steam through a tube filled with red-hot charcoal; by passing alcohol or camphor through red-hot tubes; by distilling oils, wood, bones, wax, tallow, or any animal or plant material.
Indeed it would be endless to enumerate the various sources of this gazeous fluid. A most curious variety of carburetted hidrogen gas has been discovered by the associated Dutch chemists (Van Dieman, Troostwyck, and others) which is procured from ether or alcohol, and has the remarkable property of generating a heavy oil when in contact with chlorine gas.[91] Hence it has been termed oily carburetted hidrogen, or olifiant gas—it consists of carburetted hydrogen, supersaturated with carbon. The oil generated is heavier than water, whitish, and semi-transparent. By keeping, it becomes yellow and limpid; its smell is highly fragrant and penetrating—its taste somewhat sweet—it is partly soluble in water, imparting to it, its peculiar smell. A portion of this gas always accompanies the common carburetted hidrogen obtained from coal, and those sorts of coal that afford the largest quantity of it are best suited for the production of gas-light.
Indeed, it would be endless to list the different sources of this gaseous fluid. A particularly interesting type of carbureted hydrogen gas has been discovered by the associated Dutch chemists (Van Diemen, Troostwyck, and others) which is derived from ether or alcohol, and has the notable ability to produce a heavy oil when it comes into contact with chlorine gas.[91] Therefore, it has been called oily carbureted hydrogen, or olifiant gas—it consists of carbureted hydrogen that is oversaturated with carbon. The oil produced is heavier than water, whitish, and semi-transparent. When stored, it turns yellow and clear; its smell is very fragrant and strong—its taste is slightly sweet—it is partly soluble in water, giving it its distinctive scent. Some of this gas always comes along with the common carbureted hydrogen obtained from coal, and the varieties of coal that provide the largest amount of it are the most suitable for producing gas light.
The nature of carburetted hidrogen obtained from coal varies considerably according to the conditions under which it is obtained. The first part is always much heavier than the last, though still lighter than common air, and holds in solution a portion of oil, for on standing for some time over water it becomes lighter, and is found to require less oxygen for saturation than before. The oil which it held suspended, then becomes precipitated. The average specific gravity of the first and last gas mixed, which may be taken as an average of the whole specific gravity is to that of common[92] air as 2 to 3—112lb. of common cannel coal produce at its minimum, from 350 to 360 cubic feet of carburetted hidrogen gas; but the same quantity of the best Newcastle coal, that is to say, such as coke, which, when laid on the fire readily undergoes a kind of semi-fusion, and sends out brilliant streams of flame, produces upon an average from 300 to 360 cubic feet of this gazeous fluid, besides a large portion of sulphuretted hidrogen, carbonic oxid and carbonic acid. Half a cubic foot of this carburetted hidrogen, fresh prepared, that is to say, holding in solution or suspension, a portion of the essential oil, which is generated during the evolution of the gas, is equal in illuminating power to from 170 to 180 grains of tallow, (being the quantity consumed by a candle six to the pound in one hour.) Now, one pound avoirdupoise is equal to 7000 grains, and consequently one pound of candles of six in the pound, burning one at a time in succession, would last (if we take 175 grains of tallow to be consumed in an hour) 7000175 = 40 hours. To produce the same light we must burn one half of a cubic foot of coal-gas per hour; therefore, one-half multiplied by forty hours is equal to twenty cubic feet of gas in 40 hours,[93] consequently equal to one pound of candles, six to the pound, provided they were burnt one after another. One hundred and twelve pounds of cannel-coal, produce, at its minimum, three hundred and fifty cubic feet of gas; and are equal to three hundred and fifty, divided by twenty, which last is equivalent to one pound of tallow, making one hundred and twelve pounds of cannel-coal, equal to 35020 = 171⁄2lbs. of tallow. Further, one hundred and twelve pounds of cannel-coal, divided by seventeen and a half of tallow make six and four-tenths of cannel-coal, equal to one pound of tallow.
The characteristics of carburetted hydrogen extracted from coal vary greatly depending on how it’s obtained. The initial portion is always much heavier than the last, but still lighter than regular air, and it contains some oil. After standing for a while over water, it becomes lighter and requires less oxygen for saturation than before. The suspended oil then precipitates out. The average specific gravity of the mixed initial and final gas, which we can consider as the average specific gravity for the whole, is in a ratio of 2 to 3 compared to common air. One hundred twelve pounds of common cannel coal can produce, at its minimum, between 350 to 360 cubic feet of carburetted hydrogen gas; conversely, the same amount of the best Newcastle coal, like coke—which easily undergoes a semi-fusion and emits bright flames—produces around 300 to 360 cubic feet of this gaseous fluid, along with a notable amount of hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. Half a cubic foot of freshly prepared carburetted hydrogen, which contains some essential oil generated during its production, has an illuminating power equivalent to 170 to 180 grains of tallow (the amount a six-to-the-pound candle consumes in an hour). Since one pound avoirdupois equals 7000 grains, if we burn one candle at a time from a batch of six, it would last (assuming 175 grains of tallow are used in one hour) 7000175 = 40 hours. To generate the same amount of light, we’d need to burn half a cubic foot of coal gas every hour; thus, half multiplied by forty hours gives us twenty cubic feet of gas over 40 hours,[93] which equals one pound of six-to-the-pound candles burned one after the other. One hundred twelve pounds of cannel coal yield, at its minimum, three hundred fifty cubic feet of gas, which is equal to three hundred fifty divided by twenty (which corresponds to one pound of tallow), making one hundred twelve pounds of cannel coal equivalent to 35020 = 171⁄2 pounds of tallow. Additionally, dividing one hundred twelve pounds of cannel coal by seventeen and a half pounds of tallow results in six and four-tenths of cannel coal being equal to one pound of tallow.
With regard to Newcastle coals[17], it may be stated that one chaldron of Wall’s-End coal may be made to produce in the large way upwards of 11,000 cubic feet of crude gas; which, when properly purified, diminishes to nearly 10,000 cubic feet.
With respect to Newcastle coals[17], it can be said that one chaldron of Wall's-End coal can produce over 11,000 cubic feet of raw gas on a large scale; after proper purification, this amount reduces to nearly 10,000 cubic feet.
The production of carburetted hydrogen, both with regard to quantity and quality from the same kind of coal depends much upon the degree of temperature employed in the distillatory process. If the tar and oil produced during[94] the evolution of the gas in its nascent state, be made to come in contact with the sides of the red hot retorts, or if it be made to pass through an iron cylinder or other vessel heated red hot, a large portion becomes decomposed into carburetted hydrogen gas and olifiant gas, and thus a much larger quantity of gas is produced than would be obtained without such precaution from the same quantity of coal.[18]
The production of carburetted hydrogen, in terms of both quantity and quality from the same type of coal, greatly relies on the temperature used in the distillation process. If the tar and oil produced during the gas's initial formation make contact with the sides of the red-hot retorts, or if they pass through an iron cylinder or another vessel heated to red-hot, a significant portion breaks down into carburetted hydrogen gas and olefins. This results in a much larger volume of gas being produced than what would be achieved without such measures from the same amount of coal.[94][18]
The distillation of the coal, (if gas be the chief object) should therefore not be carried on too rapidly. Most of the retorts used in the large way, are calculated for containing about one hundred weight of coal, and in general, when previously heated, produce from two and one-half to three cubic feet of gas, in four hours for each pound of coal they contain; but when the layer of coals in them does not exceed four inches in depth, three and one-half to four feet of gas may be obtained in the same time.
The distillation of coal, especially when gas is the main goal, shouldn’t be done too quickly. Most large-scale retorts can hold about 100 pounds of coal, and typically, when preheated, they produce about two and a half to three cubic feet of gas for every pound of coal over a four-hour period. However, if the layer of coal in them is no more than four inches deep, you can get three and a half to four feet of gas in the same amount of time.
The retorts best calculated for large gas-light works are seven or eight foot long (without the mouth-piece) and twelve inches in diameter,[95] tapering down to ten inches—if they are larger the coal which they contain cannot be heated properly. The advantages that may be derived from the circumstances before stated are of greater value in the gas-light manufacture than is often imagined, and the quantity as well as the quality of the gas is very much influenced by such circumstances. If coal be distilled with a very low red heat scarcely observable by daylight, the gas produced gives a feeble light—if the temperature be increased so that the distillatory vessel is of a dull redness, the light is more brilliant and of a better colour—if a bright or cherry-red heat be employed the gas produced, burns with a brilliant white flame, and if the heat be increased so far that the retort is almost white hot, and consequently in danger of melting, the gas given out, has little illuminating power, and burns with a clear blueish flame;[19] or if the coal abounds in pyrites or sulphuret of iron, as is sometimes the case with Newcastle coal, a large quantity of sulphuretted hidrogen is likewise evolved, which although it increases the illuminating power of the coal-gas, has the capital disadvantage, of producing[96] an intolerable suffocating odour, when the gas is burnt which is particularly perceptible in low rooms illuminated with such gas.
The best retorts for large gas-light works are about seven or eight feet long (excluding the mouthpiece) and twelve inches in diameter, tapering down to ten inches. If they are any larger, the coal inside can’t be heated properly. The benefits of the conditions mentioned are more valuable in gas-light manufacturing than people often realize, and both the quantity and quality of the gas are heavily influenced by these factors. If coal is distilled at a very low red heat that's barely visible in daylight, the resulting gas produces a weak light. If the temperature is increased to a dull red glow, the light becomes brighter and better in color. When a bright or cherry-red heat is applied, the gas burns with a brilliant white flame. However, if the heat is raised to the point where the retort is nearly white hot and at risk of melting, the gas released has very little illuminating power and burns with a clear bluish flame; or if the coal has a lot of pyrites or iron sulfide, like sometimes found in Newcastle coal, a significant amount of hydrogen sulfide is also released, which, although it boosts the illuminating power of the coal gas, has the major drawback of creating a terrible suffocating smell when burned, especially noticeable in low rooms lit with such gas.
These observations also apply to the distillation of tar, which when distilled either in a vaporous or nascent state, during its first production from coal in the ordinary process, or if it be submitted to a second distillation, mingled with a fresh portion of pit-coal, a practice usually had recourse to when this product cannot be disposed of more advantageously. The best depth of coal in the retort for procuring excellent gas, and at the same time for yielding the greatest quantity from the same weight in the shortest possible time, is about six inches.
These observations also apply to the distillation of tar, which, when distilled either in a vaporous or newly formed state during its initial production from coal in the standard process, or if it undergoes a second distillation mixed with a fresh batch of coal, is a method often used when this product can't be sold more profitably. The optimal amount of coal in the retort for producing high-quality gas while maximizing the output from the same weight in the shortest time is about six inches.
The brightness of the coal-gas flame is rather diminished when the gas has been long kept over water, and hence for illumination it should be used as soon as prepared, but of course properly purified.
The brightness of the coal-gas flame is reduced when the gas has been stored over water for a long time, so it should be used for lighting as soon as it's made, but it definitely needs to be properly purified.
The quantity of gas taken up by water is affected by temperature, because the temperature increases its elasticity; the quantity of gas absorbed, diminishes as the temperature increases, and increases as the temperature diminishes. 1⁄27 part of its own bulk of pure coal-gas[97] is absorbed by the water over which it is confined in the gazometer.
The amount of gas that water can hold is influenced by temperature, as increasing temperature raises its elasticity. The amount of gas absorbed decreases when the temperature goes up and increases when the temperature goes down. 1⁄27 of its own volume of pure coal gas[97] is absorbed by the water in the gas holder.
The chemical constitution of this gazeous fluid is best ascertained by burning it in a vessel of oxygen gas, over lime-water in a pneumatic reservoir, by means of a bladder and bent brass pipe. Two products are then obtained, viz. water and carbonic acid. That water is produced, may be shown by burning a very small stream of the gas in a long funnel-shaped tube open at both ends. The formation of carbonic acid is evinced, by the copious precipitation of the lime-water in the foregoing experiment.
The chemical composition of this gas is best determined by burning it in a container of oxygen gas, over lime water in a gas collection jar, using a bladder and a bent brass pipe. Two products are formed: water and carbon dioxide. The production of water can be demonstrated by igniting a small stream of the gas in a long funnel-shaped tube that is open at both ends. The formation of carbon dioxide is indicated by the heavy precipitation of the lime water in the previous experiment.
If carburetted hydrogen be mixed with a sufficient quantity of oxygen gas or common air and fired by the electric spark, or by any other method, an explosion takes place more or less violent according to the quantity of carbonaceous matter condensed in the hydrocarbonat; and the remaining gas consists of carbonic acid, together with any unconsumed gas, or excess of oxygen, whilst the water condenses in drops on the sides of the vessel. A few cubic inches of the mixed airs is as much as can be conveniently managed at a single explosion; and when any portion of[98] olefiant gas is present, even this quantity will endanger very thick glass jars. A very vivid red flame appears at the moment of the explosion, and a great enlargement takes place in an instant, after which the bulk is suddenly reduced to much less than the original quantity. When the carbonic acid is absorbed by lime-water, if the gasses have been properly proportioned, no gazeous residue is left, except accidental impurities. Though carburetted hydrogen gas, is sometimes naturally produced in coal-mines, and occasionally mixes with common air, producing dreadful explosions, yet when coal-gas is mixed with common air, it does not explode unless the gas be to the air as 1 to 10 nearly. Such are the leading chemical habitudes of this gazeous product. The varieties of carburetted hydrogen gas all agree in being inflammable; but they possess this property in various degrees, as is evinced by the variable brightness of the flame which they yield when set on fire.
If hydrogen gas is mixed with enough oxygen or regular air and ignited by an electric spark or another method, an explosion happens, varying in intensity based on the amount of carbon in the hydrocarbon. The remaining gas consists of carbon dioxide, along with any unburned gas or excess oxygen, while water condenses in droplets on the sides of the container. A few cubic inches of the mixed gases is all that can be safely managed in a single explosion; if any olefiant gas is present, even this amount can pose a danger to very thick glass jars. A bright red flame appears at the moment of the explosion, followed by a rapid expansion, after which the volume quickly decreases to much less than the original amount. When carbon dioxide is absorbed by lime water, and if the gases have been correctly mixed, no gaseous residue is left, aside from random impurities. While hydrogen gas can occur naturally in coal mines and sometimes mixes with regular air, creating dangerous explosions, coal gas does not explode when mixed with air unless the ratio is nearly 1 to 10. These are the main chemical behaviors of this gas. All types of hydrogen gas are flammable, but they vary in how readily they ignite, which is reflected in the different brightness levels of the flames they produce when lit.
“Messrs. Sobolewsky and Horrer, of St. Petersburgh, have employed wood for the purpose of producing carburetted hydrogen gas. The pyroligneous acid obtained in this operation, when freed from the empyreumatic oil with[99] which it is mixed, becomes acetous acid, and is applicable to all the uses of vinegar. A cubic cord of wood equal to 2.133 French metres (a metre being rather more than an English yard), yields 255 Paris pounds of charcoal, and 70 buckets of acid. The latter gives 30 pounds of tar, after the extraction of it 50 buckets of good vinegar remain. The same quantity of wood furnishes 50,000 cubic feet of gas, sufficient for the supply of 4000 lamps for five hours.”[20]
“Mr. Sobolevsky and Mr. Horror from St. Petersburg have used wood to generate carburetted hydrogen gas. The pyroligneous acid produced in this process, once separated from the empyreumatic oil it’s mixed with[99], turns into acetic acid, which can be used like vinegar. One cubic cord of wood, equal to 2.133 French meters (a meter is slightly more than a yard), yields 255 Paris pounds of charcoal and 70 buckets of acid. From the acid, 30 pounds of tar can be extracted, leaving 50 buckets of good vinegar. The same amount of wood produces 50,000 cubic feet of gas, enough to supply 4,000 lamps for five hours.”[20]
UTILITY
OF THE
GAS-LIGHT ILLUMINATION,
REGARDING
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ECONOMY.
From what has been stated in the preceding pages it becomes obvious, that a substance yielding an artificial light may be obtained from common coal in immense quantities. The attempt to derive advantage from so valuable a discovery is surely no idle speculation. Let us therefore now consider to what objects of public and private utility this mode of procuring[100] light may be applied with effect. It is obvious that coal-gas may be preserved in a reservoir for any length of time and that it may be conveyed by means of tubes to any distance flowing equably and regularly like water. Those, indeed, who have not seen the contrivance will find it difficult to imagine with what ease it is managed. The gas may be distributed through an infinity of ramifications of tubes with the utmost facility. Near the termination of each of the tubes through which it flows, it is confined by a valve or stop-cock, upon turning which, when required to be lighted, it flows out in an equable stream and ascends by its specific levity. There is nothing to indicate its presence; no noise at the opening of the stop-cock or valve—no disturbance in the transparency of the atmosphere—it instantly bursts on the approach of a lighted taper, into a brilliant, noiseless, steady and beautiful flame. Its purity is attested by its not blacking or soiling in the least degree the metallic orifice from which it issues, nor even a sheet of white paper, or polished surface brought in contact with it. There is no escape of combustible matter unconsumed, which is so great a nuisance[101] in all our common lights. The products of the combustion are water and carbonic acid gas[21]. The accurate and elegant experiments of Dr. W. Henry have shewn in the most satisfactory manner, that considerably less carbonic acid is produced by the flame of coal-gas, than by that of oil, tallow, or wax[22], which[102] sufficiently refutes the absurd notions that have been circulated respecting the pernicious effects of gas-lights. But if the gas from Newcastle coal is badly prepared, or not deprived of the portion of sulphuretted hydrogen, which it usually contains, it then emits fiery sparks and produces a portion of sulphureous acid by virtue of the union of the oxygen of the air with the sulphur dissolved in the gas, the consequence of which is, a suffocating odour, which is particularly observable in the higher stratum of the air of apartments in which the gas is burnt. Such gas likewise tarnishes all metallic bodies—it discolours the paintings effected with metallic oxids, and always produces a suffocating odour very noxious to health. It is freed from the sulphuretted hydrogen and may be rendered fit for illumination by passing it repeatedly through very dilute solutions of sub-acetate of lead, green sulphate of iron, quicklime and water, or hyper-oxymuriate of lime.
From what’s been discussed in the earlier pages, it’s clear that we can produce artificial light from common coal in huge amounts. Trying to take advantage of such a valuable discovery is definitely not a pointless idea. So let's look at how this method of generating light can be effectively applied for public and private use. It’s evident that coal-gas can be stored in a reservoir for as long as needed and can be transported through tubes to any distance, flowing smoothly and regularly like water. For those who haven't seen the setup, it’s hard to imagine just how easily it works. The gas can be distributed through countless tube branches without any difficulty. Near the end of each tube, it’s controlled by a valve or stop-cock, and when it needs to be lit, it flows out steadily and rises due to its lighter density. There’s no indication of its presence—no sound when turning the stop-cock or valve, and no disturbance in the air’s clarity—it immediately bursts into a brilliant, quiet, steady, and beautiful flame when a lit taper approaches. Its purity is confirmed by the fact that it doesn’t blacken or dirty the metallic outlet from which it comes, nor does it mark a sheet of white paper or a polished surface that comes into contact with it. There’s no release of unburned combustible materials, which is such a nuisance with regular lights. The only byproducts of combustion are water and carbon dioxide. Dr. W. Henry's precise and elegant experiments have shown very convincingly that burning coal-gas produces significantly less carbon dioxide than burning oil, tallow, or wax, which effectively disproves the ridiculous ideas circulated about the harmful effects of gas lights. However, if the gas from Newcastle coal is poorly prepared or not stripped of the sulfur-containing hydrogen it usually has, it can emit fiery sparks and produce sulfuric acid due to the reaction of air's oxygen with the sulfur in the gas, resulting in a suffocating odor that’s especially noticeable in the upper layers of air in rooms where the gas is burned. That kind of gas also tarnishes metals—it discolors paintings made with metallic oxides and always produces a very harmful suffocating odor. It can be purified from the hydrogen sulfide and made suitable for lighting by passing it several times through very dilute solutions of lead subacetate, green iron sulfate, quicklime and water, or calcium hyperchlorite.
[21] The water (which passes off in imperceptible vapour) is generated by part of the oxygen of the air uniting with part of the hydrogen, which forms the great bulk of the coal-gas: and the carbonic acid gas is produced by the union of another portion of the oxygen uniting with the smaller portion of carbon, which is the other component part of the coal-gas.
[21] The water (which evaporates unnoticed) is created when some of the oxygen in the air combines with part of the hydrogen that makes up most of coal gas. The carbon dioxide is formed when another portion of the oxygen combines with the smaller amount of carbon, which is the other component of coal gas.
[22] 100 Cubic inches of carburetted hydrogen from coal, require for burning 220 cubic inches of oxygen and produce 100 cubic inches of carbonic acid—100 cubic inches of the same gas obtained from wax, require for burning 280 cubic inches of oxygen and produce 137 cubic inches of carbonic acid—100 cubic inches of the same gas procured from lamp-oil, require 190 cubic inches of oxygen for burning, and produce 124 cubic inches of carbonic acid.
[22] 100 cubic inches of hydrogen gas from coal require 220 cubic inches of oxygen to burn, producing 100 cubic inches of carbon dioxide. In comparison, 100 cubic inches of the same gas from wax need 280 cubic inches of oxygen for combustion and produce 137 cubic inches of carbon dioxide. Similarly, 100 cubic inches of the gas from lamp oil require 190 cubic inches of oxygen to burn, yielding 124 cubic inches of carbon dioxide.
The following lines relating to the salubrity of the gas-light illumination are copied from Mr. Lee’s evidence in the House of Commons, when examined on that subject.
The following statements about the health benefits of gas lighting come from Mr. Lee’s testimony in the House of Commons when he was asked about it.
Question—“Is the health of your manufacturers at all affected by the use of gas?—Answer—Not in the least, or I would not have adopted it. I believe I explained to the Committee, that I used the gas-lights in my own house first.”
Question—“Does using gas impact the health of your workers?”—Answer—“Not at all, or I wouldn’t have chosen it. I believe I told the Committee that I first used gas lights in my own home.”
Q. “You have not seen the smallest alteration in the health of your workmen?—A. Not in the least, for had I seen it, it would have been a fatal objection to it.”
Q. “You haven’t seen any change in the health of your workers? — A. Not at all, because if I had, it would have been a serious concern.”
Q. “And you say the same in regard to the use of the gas-lights in your own family?—A. Certainly I do.”
Q. “Do you feel the same way about using gas lights in your own home?—A. Absolutely.”
As to the brilliancy of the flame, an appeal may be made to every one who has witnessed the gas-light illumination, whether it be not superior to the best wax candle-light, or the light of Argand’s lamps.
As for the brightness of the flame, anyone who has seen gas lighting can attest that it’s better than the best wax candles or the light from Argand lamps.
It may be described as a rich compact flame, burning with a white and agreeable light. It is also perfectly steady, when the flame is limited to a moderate size: in large masses, it is subject to that undulation which is common to it with all flames of certain dimensions, and is caused by the agitation of the surrounding atmosphere. The gas flame is entirely free from smell. The coal-gas itself certainly has a disagreeable foetid odour before it is burnt, so has the vapour of wax, oil, and tallow, as it comes from a lamp or candle newly blown out. This concession proves nothing against the flame of gas which is perfectly inodorous, a white handkerchief, passed repeatedly through it and applied to the nose, excites no odour.
It can be described as a bright, compact flame, burning with a white and pleasant light. It remains completely steady when the flame is kept to a moderate size; however, in larger flames, it experiences the flickering that's typical of flames of certain sizes, caused by the movement of the surrounding air. The gas flame has no smell at all. The coal gas itself definitely has an unpleasant, foul odor before being burned, and so do the vapors from wax, oil, and tallow when they come from a lamp or candle that has just been blown out. This point doesn't really argue against the gas flame, which is completely odorless; a white handkerchief, passed through the flame several times and then held to the nose, produces no smell.
Another peculiar advantage of the gas flame is, that it may be applied in any direction we please, as there is nothing to spill and the gas is propelled by a certain force which is always the same, it will burn equally well in an almost horizontal as in an upright position; and we can thus obviate two great objections to all our artificial lights, that their least luminous end is directed downwards where the light is generally most wanted, and that a shade is cast below[104] by the stand or support of the combustible matter.
Another unique benefit of the gas flame is that we can use it in any direction we want. Since there’s nothing to spill and the gas is pushed out with a consistent force, it burns just as well in a nearly horizontal position as it does upright. This allows us to address two major issues with our artificial lights: their least bright end usually points downward, where light is often most needed, and a shadow is created below by the fixture or support of the fuel. [104]
The size, shape and intensity of the gas-flame may be regulated by simply turning a stop-cock which supplies the gas to the burner. It may at command be made to burn with an intensity sufficient to illuminate every corner of a room, or so low and dim as barely to be perceived. It is unnecessary to point out how valuable such lights may be in nurseries, stables, warehouses, in the chambers of the sick, &c.
The size, shape, and intensity of the gas flame can be easily adjusted by turning a stopcock that supplies gas to the burner. You can make it burn brightly enough to light up every corner of a room or so low and dim that it’s barely noticeable. It's worth mentioning how useful such lights can be in nurseries, stables, warehouses, and for those in sickrooms, etc.
From the facility with which the gas-flame can be conveyed in any direction, from the diversified application, size and shape which the flame can be made to assume, there is no other kind of light so well calculated for being made the subject of splendid illuminations.
From how easily the gas flame can be directed in any direction, along with the variety of uses, sizes, and shapes the flame can take on, there’s no other type of light better suited for creating stunning displays.
Where lustres are required in the middle of a room, the best mode of conducting the gas to the chandelier, is to pass the gas-pipe through the ceiling from the room above, immediately over the lustre. This can be easily done without injury to the apartment.
Where lights are needed in the center of a room, the best way to run the gas to the chandelier is to route the gas pipe through the ceiling from the room above, directly above the light fixture. This can be done easily without damaging the space.
Where side-lights and chandeliers are required the tubes need never appear in sight, but may be concealed in the wall or floor of the[105] house. When transparencies are wanted as decorations for halls, lobbies, &c. more than light, recesses may be filled with different coloured media, or paintings, and any intensity of light may be thrown on the object.
Where side lights and chandeliers are needed, the tubes can be hidden from view and placed in the walls or floors of the[105]house. When you want transparencies as decorations for halls, lobbies, etc., rather than just lighting, recessed areas can be filled with different colored media or paintings, and any level of light can be directed onto the object.
If a number of minute holes are made in the end of a gas pipe, it forms as many jets de feu, which have a very brilliant appearance; these may sometimes be placed in the focus of a parabolic reflector. In cases where the light is required to be thrown to a distance, other burners are constructed upon the same principle as the Argand lamp, forming a cylinder of flame, and admitting a current of air both to the inside and outside.
If several tiny holes are made in the end of a gas pipe, it creates several jets de feu, which look very bright; these can sometimes be positioned in the focus of a parabolic reflector. When light needs to be projected over a distance, other burners are designed based on the same principle as the Argand lamp, creating a cylinder of flame and allowing air to flow both inside and outside.
On comparing the flame of a gas-light with the flame of a candle whatever its size may be, it appears just as yellow and dull as the flame of a common lamp appears when compared with that of a lamp of Argand. The beautiful whiteness of gas-light never fails to excite the surprize and admiration of those who behold it for the first time.
When you compare the flame of a gas light to that of a candle, no matter how big the candle is, the gas flame looks just as yellow and dull as a regular lamp does compared to an Argand lamp. The stunning whiteness of gas light always amazes and impresses those who see it for the first time.
A large edifice or manufactory lighted by gas, contrasted with one of the same kind lighted by candles or lamps, resembles a street on the[106] night of a general illumination, compared with the glimmering light of its ordinary parish lamps.
A big building or factory lit by gas, compared to one of the same type lit by candles or lamps, looks like a street on the[106] night of a big celebration, in contrast to the faint glow of its usual neighborhood lamps.
The intensity of one of the parish gas-light lamps, now exhibited in the streets of this metropolis, will bear ample testimony of this assertion; the light of the parish gas-lamps, is to the intensity of the parish oil lamps as 1 to 12.
The brightness of one of the parish gas lamps, now displayed in the streets of this city, clearly proves this point; the light from the parish gas lamps is 12 times brighter than that of the parish oil lamps.
One of the most obvious applications of the gas-light illumination unquestionably consists in lighting streets, shops and houses; and let it be observed that as this is found safe and economical, it proves all that the most ardent friends of the gas-light system can desire. For in contending with the common mode of lighting the streets and shops, the new lights must beat out of the market the cheapest of all artificial lights; and as it has succeeded in doing this it shews in the most satisfactory point of view, the prodigious advantages of gas-lights when compared with the materials of tallow and oil.
One of the most obvious uses of gas lighting is definitely for illuminating streets, shops, and homes. It’s important to note that since this method is both safe and cost-effective, it meets all the expectations of even the most passionate supporters of gas lighting. When compared to the traditional ways of lighting streets and shops, the new gas lights have to outperform the cheapest artificial lights available. Since they have managed to do this, it clearly demonstrates the huge advantages of gas lights compared to tallow and oil.
The original expence of laying the pipes for conveying the gas, together with the cost of the machinery, is all that is required; the preparation of the gas being itself a lucrative process,[107] no doubt will pay all its expences besides the interest of capital, and leave a surplus of profit.
The initial cost of installing the pipes to transport the gas, along with the price of the machinery, is all that's needed; the process of producing the gas is profitable in itself,[107] and will likely cover all expenses, the interest on the capital, and still generate a profit.
Indeed the application of the coal-gas, as a substitute for tallow and oil, to illuminate houses, shops, &c. is no longer problematical, a considerable extent of this capital, together with numerous shops and houses being already supplied with this species of light.[23]
Indeed, using coal gas instead of tallow and oil to light up homes, shops, etc. is no longer uncertain; a significant number of businesses and residences are already equipped with this type of lighting.[23]
[23] The Liberty of Norton Falgate, as far as Bishopgate-street, is lighted with gas-light, from the Chartered Company’s station at Norton Falgate; and gas-light pipes are laid from that station as far as the west end of Cheapside, and in all the streets north of that great thoroughfare.
[23] The Liberty of Norton Falgate, up to Bishopgate Street, is illuminated with gas lights from the Chartered Company’s station at Norton Falgate; and gas pipes are installed from that station all the way to the west end of Cheapside, as well as in all the streets north of that major road.
In the West end of the Town, the main pipes for supplying the streets and houses with light from the Gas-Light Company, extend through the most eligible parts; from their Establishment in Peter-street, Westminster, along the line from Pall Mall to Temple-bar, compleatly surrounding the parish of St. Martin’s in the Field. Main pipes are also placed in the Hay-market, Coventry-street, Long-Acre, St. Martin’s-lane; and in the principal parts of the parishes of St. James and St. Ann.
In the west end of the town, the main pipes for providing gas lighting to the streets and houses run through the best areas. They start at the Gas-Light Company's location on Peter Street in Westminster and follow a route from Pall Mall to Temple Bar, completely encircling the parish of St. Martin's in the Fields. Main pipes are also laid out in Haymarket, Coventry Street, Long Acre, and St. Martin's Lane, as well as in the main areas of the parishes of St. James and St. Ann.
In the East end of the metropolis, the gas-light mains extend from Cornhill to St. Paul’s, Wood-street, Fore-street, &c.—Consent has also been given to the incorporated Gas-Light Company for laying their pipes in the parish of St. Stephen’s in the Field; St. Paul Covent-garden; St. Mary-le-Strand; St. Clement Danes; St. George’s, Bloomsbury; St. Giles’s in the Fields; St. Andrew’s, Holborn, above the bars; part of the parish of St. Mary-la-bonne; besides several other districts, comprehending the whole of the city and suburbs of Westminster.
In the East end of the city, the gas-light mains stretch from Cornhill to St. Paul’s, Wood Street, Fore Street, etc.—The incorporated Gas-Light Company has also been granted permission to lay their pipes in the parish of St. Stephen’s in the Field; St. Paul Covent Garden; St. Mary-le-Strand; St. Clement Danes; St. George’s, Bloomsbury; St. Giles’s in the Fields; St. Andrew’s, Holborn, above the bars; part of the parish of St. Marylebone; as well as several other areas, covering the entire city and suburbs of Westminster.
[24] I am informed by Mr. Clegg, the engineer of the Chartered Gas-Light Company, under whose direction the new system of lighting is carried on, that the total length of pipe laid down, as mains, in the streets of London amounts already to nearly 15 miles.
[24] Mr. Clegg, the engineer of the Chartered Gas-Light Company, which manages the new lighting system, informed me that the total length of pipes installed as mains in the streets of London now adds up to almost 15 miles.
In the Eastern part of London, the same Company is engaged to lay their pipes in the principal parts of Whitechapel, Spitalfields, St. Luke’s, and the adjoining neighbourhood.
In the eastern part of London, the same company is laying pipes in the main areas of Whitechapel, Spitalfields, St. Luke’s, and the surrounding neighborhoods.
One part of the city of London, extending from Temple-bar to the West end of Cheapside; from Newgate-street to Holborn Bars, together with the intervening streets, is also provided with pipes laid down by another gas-light association, who have opened a new Establishment in Water-lane, Fleet-street, but are unconnected with the Chartered Company. A third company is projected in Southwark, and a fourth in the Eastern district of London, creating by a rivalry of interest, that laudable competition which always proves beneficial to the public at large, and which cannot fail to accelerate the progress of this new art of procuring light.
Another section of London, from Temple Bar to the western end of Cheapside and from Newgate Street to Holborn Bars, along with the streets in between, has pipes installed by a different gas-light company that has recently opened a new location on Water Lane, Fleet Street; however, they are not connected to the Chartered Company. A third company is planned for Southwark, and a fourth for the eastern part of London, creating healthy competition that will always benefit the public and will certainly accelerate the progress of this new method of producing light.
The Church of St. John the Evangelist in this metropolis has been illuminated with gas-lights for upwards of two years: the lights employed in this edifice is equal to 360 tallow candles eight to the pound. The avenues to the House of Lords and House of Commons, Westminster-hall, Westminster-bridge; the house and offices of the Speaker of the House of Commons, the Mansion-house, and many other places, deserve to be named, as having already adopted this species of illumination.
The Church of St. John the Evangelist in this city has been lit with gas lights for over two years. The lighting used in this building is equivalent to 360 tallow candles, eight to the pound. The roads to the House of Lords and House of Commons, Westminster Hall, Westminster Bridge, the house and offices of the Speaker of the House of Commons, the Mansion House, and many other locations should be mentioned, as they have all already adopted this type of lighting.
Another advantageous application of the gas-light must be the supplying of light-houses.
Another beneficial use of gas lighting must be to provide illumination for lighthouses.
From the splendour and distinguishing forms which the gas-light flame is capable of assuming, no light is better calculated for signal-lights than this. By means of one single furnace as much gas might readily be procured as would furnish a flame of sufficient intensity, during the longest winter night, exceeding in brilliancy or intensity of light any light-house in Britain or elsewhere.
From the brilliance and unique shapes that a gas flame can take on, there's no light better suited for signals than this. With just one furnace, you could easily produce enough gas to create a flame that remains brightly lit throughout the longest winter night, outshining any lighthouse in Britain or beyond.
If every light-house round this island were possessed of a gas-light furnace, one-half part of the enormous expence which they at present require would furnish a much more brilliant light. The cheapness of this light and its efficacy for the purpose, would soon multiply the number of light-houses, and thus most essentially contribute to the security of navigation on our coast. The gas may be made to issue from tubes by long narrow slips, and a surface of flame produced of any given dimensions, and free from all smoke that would obscure the reflectors.
If every lighthouse around this island had a gas-light furnace, half of the huge expenses they currently require would provide a much brighter light. The affordability of this light and its effectiveness for the purpose would soon increase the number of lighthouses, significantly improving navigation safety along our coast. The gas can be released from tubes through long, narrow openings, creating a flame surface of any desired size, free from any smoke that would block the reflectors.
The ease with which the largest gas-light flame is instantly extinguished by shutting the[110] stop-cock, and the readiness with which a long line of gas catches fire by applying a lighted taper to one extremity, are properties that cannot fail to recommend it for the purposes of telegraphic communications by night. Another application of the gas unquestionably might be the lighting of barracks, arsenals, dock-yards, and other establishments where much light is wanted in a small place.
The way the biggest gas-light flame goes out immediately when you close the[110] stop-cock, and how easily a long line of gas ignites when you bring a lit taper to one end, are features that definitely make it suitable for nighttime telegraphic communications. Another use for gas could be lighting barracks, arsenals, dockyards, and other places where a lot of light is needed in a small area.
The annual expence of lighting the barracks of Great Britain is said to fall little short of 50,000l. a small part of which on the new plan, would supply them with a much purer and safer light.
The yearly cost of lighting the barracks in Great Britain is reported to be just under £50,000, a small portion of which under the new plan would provide them with a much cleaner and safer light.
The uses of the gas-lights already enumerated must of themselves, justify us in attaching great importance to the discovery, and if reduced to practice all over the kingdom, would employ a large capital in a way the most advantageous and productive. But the utility of this light will be almost indefinitely increased to the use of private families. That such an application is practicable, in all towns of Great Britain, is obvious, from what has been done already, and that it would be highly economical and ornamental, there can be little doubt.
The uses of the gas lights already mentioned justify their importance. If implemented throughout the country, they would invest significant capital in a highly beneficial and productive way. Additionally, the usefulness of this lighting system for private households would be significantly enhanced. It's clear that such an application is doable in all towns across Great Britain, based on what has already been achieved, and it's hard to argue against its economic and aesthetic advantages.
By means of gas we may have a pure and agreeable light at command in every room of our house, just as we have the command of water, with this singular advantage, that these lights may burn for hours within an inch of the most combustible substance without danger, because they neither can burn down like a candle nor emit sparks. These properties make the gas-lights a most desirable light on board our ships of war, where severe regulations are necessary to prevent danger from fire, which after all are frequently evaded. The gas-light might be used in the store-rooms, and even in the powder magazine, and the captain would completely command the supply of light by the possession of the key which opens and shuts the stop-cock. A small apparatus which may be erected at a trifling expence would be sufficient for that purpose.
With gas, we can have a clean and pleasant light available in every room of our house, just like we have access to water, with the unique advantage that these lights can burn for hours close to the most flammable materials without any risk, since they don’t burn down like candles and don’t produce sparks. These features make gas lights a very suitable option on our warships, where strict regulations are needed to prevent fire hazards, which can often be ignored. Gas lights could be used in storage rooms, and even in the powder magazine, allowing the captain to fully control the lighting supply by having the key to the stop-cock. A small setup that can be created at a low cost would be enough for this purpose.
In shops, counting-houses, and public offices, the advantages are a white light, nearly equal to day-light, a warmth which almost supersedes the use of fires, a total absence of smoke, smell, and vapour, and great economy of labour.
In stores, offices, and government buildings, the benefits include bright lighting that's almost like daylight, warmth that often replaces the need for fires, no smoke, odors, or vapor, and a significant reduction in labor costs.
The heat produced by gas-lights must be observed by every one who has had an opportunity[112] of attending to it in the most superficial manner, and the reason why gas-lights produce more heat than oil or candle-light will not appear strange to our chemical readers (and who is there now that does not know something of chemistry?) when it is considered that the gas-light flame condenses more air than the flame of oil and tallow, and consequently must produce more heat.
The heat generated by gas lights is noticeable to anyone who has even casually observed it[112]. The reason gas lights produce more heat than oil or candle lights won’t seem strange to our readers familiar with chemistry (and who doesn’t know a bit about chemistry these days?). This is because the gas light flame draws in more air than the flame from oil or tallow, and therefore must create more heat.
The flame of gas may be produced in so large a surface, as to be applied to heat the most spacious apartments as well as to light them.
The gas flame can be produced over a large area, allowing it to be used for heating and lighting even the biggest rooms.
If the gas is made to issue by a circular rim of about twelve inches diameter; it forms a sort of an Argand lamp on a great scale, and it is manifest that a circumference of three feet of flame will heat the air very rapidly, and with such uniformity that we need no longer be exposed to the partial heating occasioned by the strong draft of a large fire. A lamp of this description in the centre of a large room, with a very small fire to secure a gradual renewal of the air would enable us to enjoy the most healthful and agreeable temperature.
If gas is released through a circular rim about twelve inches in diameter, it creates a large-scale version of an Argand lamp. It’s clear that a flame with a three-foot circumference will heat the air quickly and evenly, so we won’t have to deal with the uneven heating caused by the strong draft of a large fire. A lamp like this in the center of a big room, combined with a small fire to ensure a steady flow of fresh air, would allow us to enjoy a healthy and comfortable temperature.
From trials made on this subject, I am enabled[113] to state, that three Argand’s lamps, consuming five cubic feet of gas per hour, are sufficient to keep a room 10 feet square at a temperature of 55° Fahr. when the air without doors has a temperature of freezing.[25]
From tests conducted on this topic, I can say that three Argand lamps, using five cubic feet of gas per hour, are enough to maintain a 10-foot square room at a temperature of 55° Fahrenheit when the outside air is at freezing.
[25] Mr. Dalton’s method of ascertaining the comparative quantity or effects of heat evolved during the combustion of different inflammable gases, and other substances capable of burning with flame, as stated in his System of Chemistry, vol. I. p. 76, deserves to be recommended to those who are more immediately interested in this subject. The process, which is simple, easy, and accurate, is as follows:
[25] Mr. Dalton's approach to figuring out how much heat is produced during the burning of various flammable gases and other materials that can burn with a flame, as mentioned in his System of Chemistry, vol. I. p. 76, should definitely be recommended to those who are directly interested in this topic. The process is straightforward, easy to follow, and precise, and it is as follows:
Take a bladder of any size, (let us suppose for the sake of illustration, the bladder to hold or to be equal in capacity to 30,000 grains of water,) and having furnished it with a stop-cock and a small jet pipe, fill it with the combustible gas the heating power of which is to be tried. Take also a tinned iron vessel with a concave bottom of the same capacity, pour into it as much water as will make the vessel and water together equal to the above stated bulk of water in the bladder, viz. 30,000 grains. This being done, set fire to the gas at the orifice of the pipe, and bring the point of the flame under the bottom of the tinned vessel, and suffer it to burn there, by squeezing the bladder till the whole of the gas is consumed. The increase of temperature of the water in the tinned vessel being carefully noticed before and after the experiment, gives very accurately the heating power of the given bulk of the inflammable gas.
Take a bladder of any size (let's say, for the sake of illustration, it holds 30,000 grains of water) and attach a stop-cock and a small jet pipe to it. Fill it with the combustible gas whose heating power you want to test. Next, take a tinned iron vessel with a concave bottom that has the same capacity. Pour enough water into it so that the vessel and the water together equal the same volume as that in the bladder, which is 30,000 grains. Once this is done, ignite the gas at the end of the pipe and position the flame under the bottom of the tinned vessel, letting it burn by squeezing the bladder until all the gas is used up. By carefully monitoring the temperature of the water in the tinned vessel before and after the experiment, you can accurately determine the heating power of the specified amount of flammable gas.
It was thus proved that—
It was proven that—
Olefiant gas raises an equal volume of water | 14° |
Carburetted hidrogen, or coal gas | 10 |
Carbonic oxid | 4 |
Hidrogen | 5 |
Spermaceti oil 10 grains burnt in a lamp raised 30,000 grains of water | 5 |
Tallow | 5 |
Wax | 5,75 |
Oil of turpentine | 3 |
Spirit of wine | 2 |
In all processes of the arts where a moderate heat is wanted the gas-light flame will be found very advantageous—even on a large scale this flame may be used with profit. It possesses advantages which cannot be obtained from flaming fuel, where much nicety is required; because no fuel can be managed like the flame of coal-gas. For it is well known, that when too[114] little air be given to flaming fuel it produces no flame, but sooty vapour; and if too much air be admitted to make those vapours break out into flame, the heat is often too violent. It is a fact, that flame, when produced in great quantity, and made to burn violently, by mixing with a proper portion of fresh air, driving it on the subject, and throwing it into whirls and eddies, thereby mixing the air with every part of the hot vapour, produces a very intense heat.
In all artistic processes where moderate heat is needed, gas-light flames are very beneficial—even on a large scale, this flame can be used effectively. It has advantages that can't be achieved with flaming fuels, especially when precision is required, because no fuel can be controlled like coal-gas flame. It's well known that when not enough air is supplied to flaming fuel, it creates no flame, just sooty vapor; and if too much air is allowed to ignite those vapors, the heat often becomes excessive. In fact, flame, when generated in large quantities and allowed to burn fiercely by mixing it with the right amount of fresh air—forcing it onto the material and creating whirls and eddies to combine the air with all parts of the hot vapor—produces a very intense heat.
The great power of a gas-flame does not appear when we try small quantities of it, and[115] allow it to burn quietly, because the air is not intimately brought into contact with it, but acts only on the outside; and the quantity of burning matter in the surface of a small flame is too minute to produce much effect.
The true power of a gas flame doesn't show itself when we just use small amounts and let it burn slowly, because the air doesn’t mix with it closely enough and only affects the outer layer. Plus, the amount of fuel burning on the surface of a small flame is too little to create a significant impact.
But when the flame is produced in large quantity and is freely brought forward into contact and agitated with air, its power to heat bodies is immensely increased. It is therefore peculiarly proper for heating large quantities of matter to a violent degree, especially if the contact of solid fuel with such matter is inconvenient.
But when the flame is created in large amounts and is freely exposed to air, its ability to heat objects increases significantly. This makes it especially suitable for heating large volumes of material to high temperatures, particularly when using solid fuel with that material is impractical.
As the gas-flame may be made to assume any shape and intensity, and as there is nothing to spill, it may be exhibited under such variety of forms and designs, as cannot fail to give rise to the most tasteful ornamental illumination.
As the gas flame can take on any shape and intensity, and since there’s nothing to spill, it can be displayed in a wide variety of forms and designs that are sure to inspire the most stylish decorative lighting.
Plates III. IV. and V. exhibit such designs of different kinds of gas-lamps, chandeliers, lustres, candelabras, &c. as are already in use in this Metropolis.
Dishes III. IV. and V. showcase various designs of gas lamps, chandeliers, light fixtures, candelabras, etc., that are currently in use in this city.
Plate III. fig. 1, represents a Rod Lamp. The gas passes through the rod a, to the Argand burner, which is surrounded by a cylindrical chimney, c, swelling out at the lower[116] extremity. The construction of the Argand burner we have mentioned already, p. 78.
Plate III. fig. 1, represents a Rod Lamp. The gas flows through the rod a to the Argand burner, which is enclosed by a cylindrical chimney, c, expanding at the lower[116] end. We have already discussed the design of the Argand burner, p. 78.
In all the gas-light burners, constructed on Argand’s plan, care should be taken that the flame be in contact with the air on all sides, and that the current of air be directed towards the upper extremity of the flame. This may be effected by causing a current of air to rise up perpendicular from the bottom of the chimney glass, and to pass out again through the contracted part, or upper extremity of the chimney; but no other current of air should ever be permitted to come near the gas-flame, or enter the glass chimney which covers or defends the light; for if more air be permitted to mix with the flame than is sufficient for the compleat combustion of the coal-gas, it necessarily diminishes the heat, and consequently reduces the quantity of light.
In all the gas lamps designed based on Argand's plan, it's important to ensure that the flame has airflow on all sides and that the air movement directs towards the top of the flame. This can be achieved by allowing a current of air to rise straight up from the bottom of the chimney glass and exit through the narrower part at the top. However, no other air currents should be allowed to come close to the gas flame or enter the glass chimney that protects the light; if too much air mixes with the flame beyond what is needed for complete combustion of the coal gas, it will reduce the heat and, as a result, decrease the amount of light produced.
Fig. 2. A Rod Gas Lamp, with branches. The gas passes through the hollow rod, a, and part of the hollow branch, b, to the burner of the lamp. The cylindrical shaped glass, c, exhibited in this figure, is not so well adapted for the compleat combustion of coal-gas, as the belly-shaped chimney, c, represented in[117] fig. 1, 3, 5, 6, because the ascending current of fresh air is not turned out of its perpendicular course, and thrown immediately in a concentrated state, into the upper part of the flame where the combustion of the gas is less perfect. The exterior current of air which enters at the bottom into the lamp, rises merely with a velocity proportioned to the length of the cylinder, and to the rarefaction of the air in the same, but without being propelled to the apex of the flame, as it should do, and is made to do, in the bellied glass adapted to the lamp, fig. 1.
Fig. 2. A Rod Gas Lamp, with branches. The gas flows through the hollow rod, a, and part of the hollow branch, b, to the burner of the lamp. The cylindrical glass shape, c, shown in this figure, isn't as good for the complete combustion of coal gas as the belly-shaped chimney, c, shown in[117] fig. 1, 3, 5, 6, because the rising current of fresh air isn't redirected from its straight path and isn't immediately concentrated into the upper part of the flame where the gas combustion is less effective. The outside air that enters the lamp from the bottom rises only at a speed determined by the length of the cylinder and the lower pressure of the air inside, but it doesn’t get pushed to the top of the flame as it should and does in the bellied glass designed for the lamp, fig. 1.
Fig. 3. A Bracket Lamp. a, the tube which conveys the gas to the burner; b, the stop-cock of the tube.
Fig. 3. A Bracket Lamp. a, the tube that carries the gas to the burner; b, the valve of the tube.
Fig. 4. A Pendent Rod Lamp; in which the gas is supposed to come from a pipe above, through the ceiling, into the pipe, a, to supply the burners. The tulip-shaped chimney, b, of this lamp, is likewise ill adapted for gas-light burners.
Fig. 4. A Pendent Rod Lamp; where the gas is expected to flow from a pipe above, through the ceiling, into the pipe, a, to provide fuel for the burners. The tulip-shaped chimney, b, of this lamp is also not well suited for gas-light burners.
Fig. 5. A pendent double-bracket Lamp. The gas passing through the perpendicular tube, a, into the brackets, b b; c shows the Argand burner.
Fig. 5. A hanging double-bracket lamp. The gas flowing through the vertical tube, a, into the brackets, b b; c displays the Argand burner.
Fig. 6. A swing Bracket Lamp. a, the gas-pipe with its stop-cock; b, a brass ball, communicating with the pipe, a; c, the conducting tube, ground air-tight into the ball, b, and communicating with the burner of the lamp, so as to allow it to have an horizontal motion.
Fig. 6. A swing Bracket Lamp. a, the gas pipe with its shut-off valve; b, a brass ball that connects to the pipe, a; c, the conducting tube, sealed tightly into the ball, b, and connected to the lamp's burner, enabling it to move horizontally.
Fig. 9. A stop-cock with ball and socket, which, when adapted to a gas-light pipe, allows it to have an universal motion, so that the light may be turned in any direction.
Fig. 9. A stopcock with a ball and socket, which, when fitted to a gas light pipe, lets it move in any direction, so the light can be aimed wherever needed.
Fig. 10. Section of the stop-cock, with ball and socket.
Fig. 10. Section of the stop-cock, with ball and socket.
[26] The gas-lamps exhibited in this plate, are employed in the library, counting-house, warehouse, and offices of Mr. Ackerman, and, by whose permission, they are copied on this occasion.
[26] The gas lamps shown in this image are used in the library, office, storage space, and work areas of Mr. Ackerman, who has kindly allowed their reproduction for this occasion.
Fig. 2. A fancy pendent Cockspur Lamp. The gas being transmitted to the burners, c c, by means of the pipe, a.
Fig. 2. An elegant pendant Cockspur Lamp. The gas is being delivered to the burners, c c, through the pipe, a.
Fig. 3. A Pedestal Argand Lamp. a, the pipe and stop-cock, which transmits to, and shuts off the gas from the burner of the lamp.
Fig. 3. A Pedestal Argand Lamp. a, the pipe and shut-off valve, which controls the gas flow to, and from, the lamp's burner.
Fig. 4. A Pedestal Cockspur Lamp. a, the stop-cock and gas-pipe.
Fig. 4. A Pedestal Cockspur Lamp. a, the stopcock and gas pipe.
Fig. 5. A fancy bracket Cockspur Lamp, intended merely to show that the coal-gas, as it passes to the burner, is perfectly devoid of colour, and invisible. a is a glass vessel furnished at its orifice with a brass cap, c, and perforated ball, out of which the gas-flame proceeds. b, the pipe which conveys the gas into the glass vessel, a.
Fig. 5. A stylish Cockspur Lamp, meant to demonstrate that the coal gas, as it travels to the burner, is completely colorless and invisible. a is a glass container with a brass cap at its opening, c, and a perforated ball, from which the gas flame comes out. b is the pipe that delivers the gas into the glass container, a.
Fig. 6. A Bracket Argand Lamp. a and b, the gas pipe communicating with the burner.
Fig. 6. A Bracket Argand Lamp. a and b, the gas pipe connected to the burner.
Fig. 7 and 8. A Horizontal Bracket Lamp. a, the gas pipe, supposed to be concealed in the ceiling. b, the communicating pipe, which, together with c, branches out at right angles at d d. e e, are the burners of the lamp.
Fig. 7 and 8. A Horizontal Bracket Lamp. a, the gas pipe, which is meant to be hidden in the ceiling. b, the connecting pipe, that, along with c, extends out at right angles at d d. e e, are the lamp's burners.
Fig. 2. An Arabesque Chandelier. The gas enters from the ceiling of the room into the rope-shaped pipe, a, from which it proceeds through one of the arched ribs, b b, into the horizontal hoop, or pipe, c.
Fig. 2. An Arabesque Chandelier. The gas flows from the ceiling of the room into the rope-shaped pipe, a, which it then travels through one of the arched ribs, b b, into the horizontal hoop, or pipe, c.
Fig. 3. A Roman Chandelier. The gas enters through the inflexible hollow chain, a, into the central tube, b, from whence the burners are supplied by the lateral branches, c c.
Fig. 3. A Roman Chandelier. The gas flows through the rigid hollow chain, a, into the central tube, b, from which the burners receive supply through the side branches, c c.
Fig. 4. A Gothic Chandelier. The gas is transmitted to the burners through the rope, a, which includes a tube, and the communication with the burners is established through the lateral branches.
Fig. 4. A Gothic Chandelier. The gas travels to the burners through the rope, a, which contains a tube, and the connection to the burners is made through the side branches.
Fig. 5. A Pedestal Figure Lamp. The gas is here made to pass by means of a pipe through the body of the figure into the lattice-work plateau, constructed of hollow and perforated brass tubes.
Fig. 5. A Pedestal Figure Lamp. The gas is directed through a pipe that runs through the body of the figure into the lattice-work plateau, made from hollow and perforated brass tubes.
Fig. 7. A Girandole. The gas enters through the bracket, a, and is conveyed to the burners by the descending tubes, b b.
Fig. 7. A Girandole. The gas comes in through the bracket, a, and is directed to the burners via the descending tubes, b b.
Fig. 8. A Candelabrum, having a central pipe, through which the gas is conducted to the burner at the top.
Fig. 8. A Candelabrum, with a central pipe that directs gas to the burner at the top.
OTHER
PRODUCTS OBTAINABLE FROM COAL:
specifically,
COKE, TAR, ESSENTIAL OIL, &c.
Having thus far considered the nature of coal-gas as a substitute for the lights now in use, it will be necessary to attend more particularly to some other products which are obtained during the production of this species of light: namely, coke, tar, ammoniacal liquor, &c.
Having looked at coal gas as a replacement for the lights we currently use, we now need to focus more closely on some other products that are produced during the creation of this type of light: specifically, coke, tar, ammoniacal liquor, etc.
It is sufficiently known, that coke is a more valuable fuel than the coal from which it is obtained.
It is well known that coke is a more valuable fuel than the coal from which it is made.
Hence, immense quantities are prepared in the large way, but the gazeous and other substances are lost in the process employed for carbonizing the coal.[27] In the manufacture[123] of coal-gas, the coke comes from the retort, enlarged in size, and greatly diminished in weight, when compared with the original coal. In whatever state the coal may be when introduced into the retort, the coke is uniformly taken out in large masses, so that the refuse coal, or dust, and sweepings of the pit, which are now thrown away, may be employed and converted into an excellent fuel. Coke is decidedly superior to coal for all domestic, and more especially for culinary purposes; the heat which it throws out being more uniform, more intense, and more durable. No flame, indeed, accompanies it, and it seldom needs the application of the poker,—that specific for the ennui of Englishmen; but these deficiences are more than balanced by the valuable property of emitting no sparks, of giving more heat, and burning free from dust and smoke.
Therefore, large quantities are produced on a massive scale, but gases and other substances are lost during the coal carbonization process.[27] In the production[123] of coal gas, the coke that comes from the retort is larger in size and significantly lighter compared to the original coal. Regardless of the state of the coal when it's placed into the retort, the coke is consistently removed in large chunks, allowing the leftover coal, dust, and debris from the mine, which is currently discarded, to be used and converted into excellent fuel. Coke is definitely better than coal for all household purposes, especially for cooking, as it produces heat that is more consistent, intense, and long-lasting. It has no flame, and it rarely requires the use of a poker—the specific remedy for the ennui of Englishmen; however, these shortcomings are more than offset by its valuable qualities: it produces no sparks, generates more heat, and burns cleanly without dust and smoke.
[27] The preparation of coke is as follows:—A quantity of large coal is placed on the ground in a round heap, of from 12 to 15 feet in diameter, and about two feet in height; as many as possible of the large pieces are placed on their ends, to form passages for the air; above them are thrown the smaller pieces and coal dust, and in the midst of this circular heap, is left, a vacancy of a foot wide where a few faggots are deposited to kindle it. Four or five apertures of this kind are formed round the ring, particularly on the side exposed to the wind; there is, however, seldom occasion to light it with wood, for other masses being generally on fire, the workmen most frequently use a few shovels of coal already burning, which acts more rapidly than wood, and soon kindles the surrounding pile; as the fire spreads, the mass increases in bulk, puffs up, becomes spongy and light, cakes into one body, and at length loses its volatile parts, and emits no more smoke. It then acquires an uniform red colour, inclining a little to white, in which state it begins to break into gaps and chinks, and assumes the appearance of the under part of a mushroom; at this moment the heap must be quickly covered with ashes, of which there is always a sufficient provision around the numerous fires, where the coke is prepared.
[27] The process of making coke is as follows: A quantity of large coal is piled on the ground in a round heap, about 12 to 15 feet in diameter and around two feet high. The larger pieces are stood on their ends to create air passages; smaller pieces and coal dust are then added on top. In the middle of this circular heap, there’s a space about a foot wide where a few sticks are placed to ignite it. Four or five such openings are made around the ring, especially on the side facing the wind. However, it's rarely necessary to light it with wood, as other piles are usually on fire. The workers often use a few shovels of already burning coal, which ignites the surrounding pile more quickly than wood. As the fire spreads, the mass expands, puffs up, becomes spongy and light, cakes into a single mass, and eventually loses its volatile components, no longer emitting smoke. It then takes on a uniform red color, with a slight white tint, at which point it starts to crack and develop gaps, resembling the bottom of a mushroom. At this moment, the heap must be quickly covered with ashes, which are always readily available around the many fires where the coke is produced.
That coke must give out more heat during its combustion than coal, will at once become obvious, when we consider that the quantity of matter which, in the combustion of coal is changed from a solid to a state of elastic fluidity, must necessarily carry off a portion[124] of caloric, which then becomes converted in a latent state without producing heat, whilst the glow of the coke radiates caloric with an intensity unimpaired by any demand of this kind.
That coke must generate more heat during combustion than coal. This is obvious when we think about the amount of material that shifts from solid to gas during coal combustion, which must take away some heat that then becomes latent and doesn’t produce any warmth. In contrast, the glow of coke emits heat intensely without being affected by that kind of demand.[124]
It is thus that coke, though somewhat more difficult of ignition than common coal, always gives out a more steady, a more lasting, and a more intense heat.
It is this way that coke, although a bit harder to ignite than regular coal, consistently produces a more steady, longer-lasting, and more intense heat.
The only inconveniences that attend the use of coke is, that, as it consumes, it leaves much more ashes than common coal, charcoal, or wood; and these much heavier too, which are, therefore, liable to collect in such quantity as to obstruct the free passage of air through the fire; and further, that when the heat is very intense, these ashes are disposed to melt or vitrify into a tenacious drossy substance, which clogs the grate, the sides of the furnace and the vessels. This last inconvenience is only troublesome, however, when the heat required is very great. In ordinary heats, such as are produced by kitchen or parlour grates, the ashes do not melt, and though they are more copious and heavy than those of charcoal or wood, they do not choke up[125] the fire, unless the bars of the grate be too close together.
The only drawbacks of using coke are that it leaves a lot more ashes than regular coal, charcoal, or wood as it burns, and these ashes are much heavier, which can build up and block airflow through the fire. Additionally, when the heat is very intense, these ashes can melt or turn into a sticky, glassy substance that clogs the grate, the sides of the furnace, and the containers. However, this last issue only becomes a problem when very high heat is needed. In typical situations, like those produced by kitchen or living room grates, the ashes don’t melt, and while they may be heavier and more abundant than charcoal or wood ashes, they won’t obstruct[125] the fire unless the bars of the grate are too close together.
The relative effects of heat produced by coke and coal are as follows:—
The effects of heat produced by coke and coal are as follows:—
Six hundred pounds of pit-coal are capable of evaporating 10 cubic feet of water in 20 hours, and 430lb. of coke are capable of evaporating 17 cubic feet of water in 12 hours and a half.[28]
Six hundred pounds of pit coal can evaporate 10 cubic feet of water in 20 hours, and 430 pounds of coke can evaporate 17 cubic feet of water in 12.5 hours.[28]
[28] In order to learn the relative effect of different kinds of fuel, with regard to their capability of producing heat, chemistry teaches that equal quantities of fuel alike expended, will raise the temperature of a given quantity of water through the same number of degrees; whence, by knowing the original quantity and temperature of water, together with the quantity of fuel expended to raise the water to the boiling point, the result sought may be expressed by stating the quantity of water at 30 degrees, which would have been raised 180 degrees by one pound of the fuel employed; or in the form of a rule,
[28] To understand how different types of fuel affect heat production, chemistry explains that using equal amounts of fuel will raise the temperature of a specific amount of water by the same number of degrees. Therefore, by knowing the initial quantity and temperature of the water, along with the amount of fuel used to bring the water to a boil, you can determine the result. This can be stated as the quantity of water at 30 degrees that would be raised by 180 degrees with one pound of the fuel used; or simply as a rule,
Multiply the quantity of water by the number expressing the degrees actually raised; multiply the number of pounds of fuel expended by 180 degrees. Divide the first product by the latter, and the quotient will express the water which would have been raised 180 degrees by one pound of the fuel. Or equal quantities of water may be compleatly evaporated under equal surfaces and circumstances, with the different kinds of fuel, the nature of which is to be examined; the quantities of fuel expended for that purpose give the relative effect of the different kinds of fuel, with regard to their power of producing heat.
Multiply the amount of water by the number of degrees it has actually heated; then multiply the number of pounds of fuel used by 180 degrees. Divide the first result by the second, and the answer will show how much water could be heated 180 degrees by one pound of fuel. Alternatively, equal amounts of water can be completely evaporated under the same conditions using different types of fuel, which should be analyzed; the amount of fuel used for that process will provide the relative effectiveness of the different fuels in terms of their heat-producing capabilities.
The Earl of Dundonald has shown that, in the application for burning lime, a quantity of coke uniformly burns a given portion of lime-stone in one-third part of the time that the quantity of coal from which the coke had been made could do.
The Earl of Dundonald has demonstrated that, when using coke to burn lime, a specific amount of coke can uniformly burn a certain amount of limestone in one-third the time it would take the equivalent amount of coal that was used to make the coke.
This effect is to be accounted for from having previously freed the coal, or rather its coke, from the moisture and the tar, which it sends out during combustion, and which condenses on the middle and upper strata of stratified limestone and coal in the lime kiln, and impedes the whole mass of materials from coming into a rapid and compleat ignition; because the greater the quantity of materials, and the sooner the whole is ignited, the better and more economically the lime is burned, both as to coals and time; the saving of which last is a material object, especially at lime-kilns where there is in the summer time a great demand for lime, the coke occasioning the kilns to hold a third more lime at the same time.
This effect happens because the coal, or more precisely, its coke, has been freed from moisture and tar before, which it releases during burning. This moisture and tar condense on the middle and upper layers of limestone and coal in the lime kiln, making it harder for the entire mass of materials to ignite quickly and completely. The more materials there are and the faster they ignite, the better and more efficiently the lime is produced, saving both coal and time. This time-saving is particularly important at lime kilns, especially in the summer when there's a high demand for lime, as the coke allows the kilns to hold a third more lime at the same time.
In the art of making bricks, in the smelting of metallic ores, and the drying of malt, the advantages of coke over coal, are sufficiently known.
In making bricks, smelting metal ores, and drying malt, the benefits of coke compared to coal are well understood.
The following account given by Mr. Davis,[29] shows that the advantages that may be derived in the processes of burning lime, plaster of paris, and bricks, by means of coke, are greater than at first sight might be imagined.
The account provided by Mr. Davis,[29] shows that the benefits gained from using coke in the processes of burning lime, plaster of Paris, and bricks are more significant than one might initially think.
“The coke obtained in the gas process is so valuable, that it appears inexplicable that men should not avail themselves of this mode of procuring light, to the almost total exclusion of all other methods now in use. As a landholder, placed among an industrious but wholly illiterate society of men, I have had the more opportunity of trying this species of fuel or coke, which I could not otherwise procure in this sequestered spot, at a tolerably cheap rate, for purposes to which it has not, as far as I know, been hitherto employed. I must tell you that I am my own lime-burner, plaster of paris baker, and brick-maker; and that in these processes of rural economy I have derived the greatest benefits from this species of fuel, which I now prepare at a cheap rate, although I waste almost the whole of the light of the coal gas intentionally. The coal which I employed formerly for the burning[128] of limestone into lime, is a very inferior kind of small coal, called here Welsh culm. The kiln for burning the limestone into lime is a cup-shaped concavity, surrounded with solid brick-work, open at the top, and terminating below by an iron grate. It has a stone door that may be opened and closed for charging and emptying the furnace when required. This furnace I formerly charged with alternate strata or layers of small coal and limestone, the latter being broken previously into pieces not larger than a man’s fist, until the kiln was completely filled. The stone is thus slowly decomposed; the upper part of the charge descends, and when it has arrived at the bottom of the furnace new strata are super-imposed, so as to keep the furnace continually full during a period of 50 hours. The quantity of lime I procured with small coal formerly amounted to 85 bushels. The strata of coal necessary for the production of this quantity of lime require to be four inches thick, and the time necessary for calcination was, as stated already, 50 hours.
The coke produced through the gas process is so valuable that it seems strange that people don’t fully take advantage of this way to create light, almost ignoring all the other methods currently in use. As a landowner surrounded by a hardworking but completely uneducated community, I’ve had the chance to test this type of fuel or coke, which I wouldn't be able to get easily in this remote area at a reasonably low cost, for uses that it hasn’t, as far as I know, been previously applied to. I should mention that I handle all my own lime-burning, plaster of Paris making, and brick-making, and I’ve gained significant benefits from this type of fuel, which I now produce cheaply, even though I intentionally waste almost all the light from the coal gas. The coal I used before for burning limestone into lime is a very low-grade type of small coal known here as Welsh culm. The kiln for burning the limestone into lime is a cup-shaped structure surrounded by solid brickwork, open at the top, and ending below with an iron grate. It has a stone door that can be opened and closed to load and unload the furnace as needed. I used to fill this furnace with alternating layers of small coal and limestone, the latter being broken into pieces no larger than a man’s fist, until the kiln was completely packed. The stone is slowly broken down; the upper part of the charge moves down, and when it reaches the bottom of the furnace, new layers are added to keep the furnace full for about 50 hours. The amount of lime I used to get from small coal was 85 bushels. The layers of coal needed to produce this quantity of lime need to be four inches thick, and the calcination process took, as mentioned earlier, 50 hours.
“On applying coke instead of coal, the produce of lime may be increased to nearly 30[129] per cent. from the same furnace, and the time required to effect the calcination of this quantity of lime-stone is reduced to 39 hours: it also requires less attendance and less labour, and the whole saving, thus accomplished, amounts to more than 50 per cent. on the lime-kiln.
“By using coke instead of coal, the output of lime can increase to almost 30[129] percent from the same furnace, and the time needed for calcining this amount of limestone is cut down to 39 hours. It also needs less supervision and less work, and the total savings achieved amount to over 50 percent on the lime-kiln.
“I have lately also employed coke for the burning of bricks. My bricks are burnt in clamps, made of bricks themselves. The place for the fuel, or fire-place, is perpendicular, about three feet high. The flues are formed by gathering or arching the bricks over, so as to leave a space between each of a brick’s breadth; and as the whole of the coal, if this fuel be employed, must, on account of the construction of the pile, be put in at once, the charge of the bricks is not, and never can be, burnt properly throughout; and the interference of the legislature, with regard to the measurement of the clamp, is a sufficient inducement for the manufacturer to allow no more space for coal than he can possibly spare.
“I have recently started using coke to fire bricks. I burn my bricks in clamps made of the bricks themselves. The area for the fuel, or the fireplace, is upright, about three feet high. The flues are created by arching the bricks over, leaving a gap the width of a brick between each one; and since all the coal, if this fuel is used, must be added at once due to the design of the pile, the batch of bricks is not, and can never be, properly burned throughout. The government's regulations regarding the measurement of the clamp provide enough reason for the manufacturer to minimize the space for coal as much as possible.”
“If coke be applied instead of coal, the arches, or empty spaces in the clamp or pile,[130] as well as the strata of the fuel, may be considerably smaller: the heat produced in this case is more uniform and more intense, and a saving of 30 per cent. at least is gained.
“If coke is used instead of coal, the arches, or empty spaces in the clamp or pile,[130] as well as the layers of the fuel, can be significantly smaller: the heat generated in this scenario is more even and more intense, and at least a 30 percent savings is achieved.”
“In the baking my own plaster-stone I also employ coke. The calcination of the stone for manure I perform in a common reverberatory furnace, and the men who conduct the process (who are otherwise averse to every thing new) are much pleased with the steadiness of the fire, and little attendance which the process requires, when coke is used instead of coal.
“In making my own plaster-stone, I also use coke. I calcine the stone for fertilizer in a regular reverberatory furnace, and the workers involved in this process (who usually dislike anything new) are quite happy with how consistent the fire is and how little attention the process needs when using coke instead of coal.”
“These are the few facts I wish to state, with regard to the useful application of this species of fuel, which, no doubt, hereafter will become an object of economy of incalculable advantage to individuals, if its nature be better understood than it is at present.”
“These are a few facts I want to share about the practical use of this type of fuel, which will likely become an incredibly beneficial economic resource for people in the future, if we understand its nature better than we do now.”
The quantity of coke obtainable from a given quantity of coal varies according to the nature of the coal employed. One chaldron of Newcastle coal produced, upon an average, in the gas-light manufacture, from one chaldron and a quarter to one chaldron and a half of well formed coke. If the carbonization of the coal has been carried to its utmost point,[131] the coke produced, has a brilliant silvery lustre. Such coke is excellent for metallurgical operations, because it stands the powerful blast of the bellows, but for culinary and other purposes of domestic economy, the carbonization should not be carried so far, because, the coke then produced, kindles more readily and makes a more cheerful fire.
The amount of coke you can get from a specific quantity of coal depends on the type of coal used. One chaldron of Newcastle coal usually produces, on average, between one and a quarter to one and a half chaldrons of well-formed coke in gas-light manufacturing. If the coal has been carbonized to its maximum extent,[131] the resulting coke has a shiny, silvery look. This type of coke is great for metalworking because it can handle the strong blast from the bellows. However, for cooking and other household uses, the carbonization shouldn’t go that far, as the coke will ignite more easily and create a cozier fire.
Coal-tar, Oil, and Pitch.—Another, valuable product obtainable from pit-coal, is coal-tar.[30] This substance is deposited, in the purification of the coal-gas, in a separate vessel destined to receive it.
Coal-tar, Oil, and Pitch.—Another valuable product that can be obtained from pit coal is coal-tar.[30] This substance is collected during the purification of coal gas in a separate vessel designed to hold it.
[30] In the year 1665, Becher, a German chemist, brought to England his discovery for extracting tar from coal, this distillation he performed in close vessels. It is not mentioned in the records of the time, whether Becher obtained, or rather collected, any other articles than the tar.
[30] In 1665, Becher, a German chemist, introduced his method for extracting tar from coal to England. He conducted this distillation in sealed containers. The records from that time do not specify whether Becher obtained or collected any other substances besides the tar.
The coal-tar is so called from its resembling common tar in its appearance, and most of its qualities.
The coal-tar is named because it looks like regular tar in both its appearance and most of its properties.
Several works have been, at different times, erected both in England and on the continent, to procure from coal a substitute for tar; but they turned out unprofitable speculations. In 1781, the Earl of Dundonald invented a mode of distilling coal in the large way, which enabled[132] him not only to form coke, but, at the same time, to save and collect the tar. Even this process however, for which a patent was taken out, has gained very little ground. Its object was still too limited; for though some of the ingredients of coal were procured, they were procured at an expense that nearly balanced the profits; and no attention whatever was paid to the coal gas, which constitutes the most important part of coal.
Several projects have been carried out, both in England and on the continent, at different times to create a substitute for tar from coal; however, they ended up being unprofitable ventures. In 1781, the Earl of Dundonald developed a method for large-scale coal distillation, which allowed[132]him to produce coke while also capturing and saving the tar. Yet, even this patented process made very little progress. Its focus was still too narrow; although some components of coal were obtained, they were acquired at a cost that almost offset the profits, and there was no attention given to coal gas, which is the most significant part of coal.
Coal-tar may be used with advantage for painting and securing wood that is exposed to the action of air or water. The wood being warmed, the tar is applied cold, and penetrating into the pores, gives the timber an uncommon degree of hardness and durability.
Coal tar can be effectively used for painting and protecting wood that is exposed to air or water. When the wood is warmed, the tar is applied cold, and it seeps into the pores, giving the timber an extraordinary level of hardness and durability.
One chaldron of Newcastle coal produces in the gas-light manufacture from 150 to 180lb of tar, according to the circumstances under which it is produced. See page 94.
One chaldron of Newcastle coal produces between 150 to 180 pounds of tar in the gas-light manufacturing process, depending on the conditions during production. See page 94.
The tar obtained from Newcastle coal-tar is specifically heavier than that produced from cannel-coal; hence it sinks in water, whereas the latter swims on the surface of that fluid.
The tar made from Newcastle coal-tar is specifically heavier than the one produced from cannel-coal; therefore, it sinks in water, while the latter floats on the surface.
To render the tar fit for use, it requires to be evaporated to give it a sufficient consistence.[133] If this process be performed in close vessels, a portion of an essential oil is obtained, which is known to colourmen by the name of oil of tar. To obtain this oil, a common still is filled with the coal-tar, and, being properly luted, the fire is kindled and kept up very moderate, for the tar is very apt to boil up in the early part of the process. The first product that distils over is principally a brown ammoniacal fluid, mixed however with a good deal of oil. As the process advances, and the heat is increased, the quantity of ammoniacal liquor lessens, and that of oil increases, and towards the end of the distillation the product is chiefly oil.
To make the tar usable, it needs to be evaporated to achieve the right consistency.[133] If this is done in closed containers, a part of an essential oil is produced, which colorists refer to as oil of tar. To obtain this oil, a typical still is filled with coal-tar, sealed carefully, and then heated gently, as the tar tends to boil over at the start of the process. The first product that comes out is mainly a brown ammoniacal liquid, but it also contains a significant amount of oil. As the process continues and the heat is increased, the amount of ammoniacal liquid decreases while the oil increases, and towards the end of the distillation, the product is mostly oil.
The oil and ammoniacal water which distil over do not mix, so that they may be easily separated by decantation. The oil is a yellowish inferior kind of oil of turpentine, which is very useful in painting ships, for making varnishes, and other coarse out-door work.
The oil and ammoniacal water that distill over don’t mix, so they can be easily separated by pouring off. The oil is a yellowish lower-quality type of turpentine, which is very useful for painting ships, making varnishes, and other rough outdoor projects.
Two hundred pounds of tar produce, upon an average, fifty-three pounds of essential oil.
Two hundred pounds of tar yield, on average, fifty-three pounds of essential oil.
If the coal-tar is wanted to be converted into pitch, without obtaining the oil which it is capable of furnishing, the evaporation of it[134] may be performed in a common boiler; but as it is extremely liable to boil over, the greatest precaution is necessary in conducting the evaporation. A boiler constructed on the following plan is very convenient for the conversion of coal-tar into pitch. The contrivance consists in adding a spout, or rim, to the common boiler, into which the tar spreads itself as it rises, and by this means becomes cooled, and the boiling over is checked.
If you want to turn coal-tar into pitch without collecting the oil it can produce, you can evaporate it in a regular boiler. However, since it tends to boil over easily, you need to be very careful during the evaporation process. A boiler designed in the following way is really useful for converting coal-tar into pitch. It has a spout, or rim, added to the standard boiler, allowing the tar to spread out as it rises, which cools it down and prevents it from boiling over.
Kettle for boiling Tar.
Kettle for boiling tar.

1000lb. of coal-tar produce, upon an average, from 460 to 480lb. of pitch. A subsequent fusion, with a gentle heat, converts the coal-pitch into a substance possessing all the characters of asphaltum.
1000 lb. of coal tar usually yields between 460 and 480 lb. of pitch. A later heating process, done gently, transforms the coal pitch into a substance that has all the properties of asphaltum.
Ammoniacal Fluid.—The properties of the ammoniacal liquor, which accompanies the tar,[135] and which is deposited in the tar-cistern, has not yet been fully investigated. It is employed already in the manufacture of muriate of ammonia (sal ammoniac). One chaldron of coal affords from 220 to 240lb. of this ammoniacal fluid, which is composed chiefly of sulphate, and carbonate of ammonia.—Such are the products obtainable from coal.
Ammoniacal Fluid.—The properties of the ammoniacal liquid that comes with the tar,[135] and is collected in the tar-cistern, haven't been fully studied yet. It's already used in the production of muriate of ammonia (sal ammoniac). One chaldron of coal produces about 220 to 240 lb. of this ammoniacal fluid, which mainly consists of ammonium sulfate and ammonium carbonate.—These are the products that can be obtained from coal.
However certain the practicability of extending the new lights to the dwelling houses of every town and village is, it cannot be expected that such an event should take place speedily and generally. To eradicate prejudice, and to alter established habits, is a work which nothing but time can effect; because prejudice is the effect of habit, and can seldom be eradicated from the minds of such individuals as consider the ready occurrence of a proposition as a test of its truth. To establish a new philosophical theory has, in every instance, required time sufficient to educate an entire generation of men. The rejection of the Aristotelian philosophy—the adoption of experimental research—the substitution of the doctrine of gravitation instead of that of vortices, and the rejection of phlogiston by modern chemists, are[136] sufficiently illustrative of this assertion. New arts, and new practices, are still more difficult to be introduced. The new art of bleaching need merely be mentioned to prove this assertion. The new grammar—the new rudiments of science—the new stile—or the new instrument, however superior to the old in simplicity, facility, and truth, must be less valuable to the ordinary teacher or artisan, whose memory is familiarized with the precepts of the latter, and whose only ambition is to earn his subsistence with the least possible exertion.
However certain the practicality of extending the new ideas to the homes of every town and village is, it can't be expected that this will happen quickly or widely. To eliminate prejudice and change established habits takes nothing but time because prejudice is a result of habit and is rarely removed from the minds of those who see the easy acceptance of a proposal as proof of its truth. Establishing a new philosophical theory has, in every case, taken enough time to educate an entire generation of people. The rejection of Aristotelian philosophy, the adoption of experimental research, the replacement of the vortex theory with the doctrine of gravitation, and the dismissal of phlogiston by modern chemists are[136]clear examples of this. New arts and practices are even harder to introduce. The new art of bleaching only needs to be mentioned to support this claim. The new grammar, the new basics of science, the new style, or the new tools, no matter how superior they are in simplicity, ease, and accuracy, will likely be less appealing to the ordinary teacher or worker, who is accustomed to the rules of the old methods and whose main goal is to make a living with the least effort possible.
The slowness with which improvements of every kind, make their way into common use, and especially such discoveries as are most calculated to be of an extended or general utility is very remarkable, and forms a striking contrast to the extreme avidity with which those unmeaning changes are adopted, which folly and caprice are continually sending forth into the world under the auspices of fashion.
The slow pace at which improvements of all kinds become widely used, especially those discoveries that have the potential for broad or general benefit, is quite surprising. It stands in stark contrast to the eagerness with which trivial changes are embraced, constantly emerging from folly and whim under the influence of fashion.
On the first view of the subject it appears very extraordinary, that any person should neglect, or refuse to avail himself of a proposed invention, or improvement, which is evidently calculated to economise his labour,[137] and to encrease his comforts; but when we reflect on the power of habit, and consider how difficult it is for a person even to perceive the disadvantages or imperfections of former modes to which he has been accustomed from his early youth, our surprize will be diminished, or vanish altogether.
At first glance, it seems really strange that anyone would ignore or turn down an invention or improvement that's clearly designed to save them effort and make their lives more comfortable. But when we think about the influence of habit and recognize how hard it is for someone to even notice the downsides or flaws of the old ways they've been used to since childhood, our surprise will lessen or completely disappear.[137]
Many other circumstances, besides prejudice, are unfavourable to the introduction of new and useful discoveries. Among these jealousy, malice, envy, and revenge, have too often their share in obstructing the progress of real improvement, and in preventing the adoption of plans evidently calculated to promote the public good.
Many other factors, besides bias, work against the introduction of new and helpful discoveries. Among these, jealousy, malice, envy, and revenge often play a role in hindering genuine progress and stopping the implementation of ideas clearly designed to benefit the public.
A plan like the present, which proposes not only to trench upon domestic habits, but to give an entire new direction to a portion of the skill and capital of the country, must necessarily encounter the most strenuous opposition. It is thus that some individuals have mustered all their strength against the introduction of this new art. An endeavour has been made to move the public opinion by dismal forebodings of the Greenland trade, and the subsequent loss of a nursery of British seamen. This objection[138] is nothing more than the common clamour that is always set up against every new means of abridging labour, to which had the public listened, an interdict would have been laid upon the spinning and threshing machines, the steam engine, and a thousand other improvements in machinery.
A plan like this one, which not only affects people's daily lives but also aims to redirect a significant amount of skill and investment in the country, is bound to face intense opposition. Some people have rallied all their energy against the introduction of this new method. There has been an effort to sway public opinion with gloomy predictions about the Greenland trade and the potential loss of a source of British seamen. This objection[138] is just the usual noise that arises against every new way to reduce labor, which, if the public had heeded, would have led to bans on spinning and threshing machines, the steam engine, and countless other machinery innovations.
Indeed such clamour scarcely ever fails to be made when the extension of machinery and the abridgement of labour or the application of inanimate powers are considered. On such occasions, it is stated by certain humane but mistaken objectors, that the scheme of mechanical and chemical improvement is pointed against the human species—that it tends to drive them out of the system of beneficial employment—that the introduction of machinery is injurious to the labouring class of society, by abridging their work. Two creatures offer themselves for employment and support—a man and a horse. I must invariably prefer the latter, and leave the former to starve. Two other beings—a horse and a steam-engine, are candidates for my favour. My preference to the latter tends to exterminate the species of the former. In both cases it is stated, that the number of intelligent[139] creatures capable of the enjoyment of happiness must be diminished for want of support; and that, on the whole, the sum of the proposed improvement is not only a less proportion of good to society, but a positive accession of misery to the unemployed poor.
Indeed, such outcry rarely fails to arise when discussing the expansion of machinery and the reduction of labor or the use of inanimate forces. During these discussions, some well-meaning but misguided individuals argue that advancements in mechanical and chemical technology are a threat to humanity—that they push people out of beneficial jobs—that the introduction of machinery harms the working class by lessening their work. When two candidates for a job and support present themselves—a man and a horse—I will always choose the horse and leave the man to struggle. Similarly, when a horse and a steam engine are competing for my favor, I prefer the engine, which leads to the decline of the horse population. In both situations, it's argued that the number of intelligent creatures capable of experiencing happiness will decline due to lack of support; and that, ultimately, the overall benefit of these proposed improvements is not only a smaller share of good for society, but also a significant increase in suffering for the unemployed poor.
On this wide and extended argument, which can in fact be maintained against all improvements whatever in no other way than by insisting that the savage state of man, with all its wants, its ignorance, its ferocity, and its privations, is preferable to the social intercourse of effort and division of labour we are habituated to prefer, it may be sufficient to observe that it includes matter not only for reasoning and induction, but also for experiment. By reference to the matter of fact, though it must be allowed that new improvements, which change the habits of the poor, must at first expose them to a temporary inconvenience and distress, against which, in fairness, it is the duty of society to defend them; yet the invariable result of such improvements is always to better the condition of mankind. A temporary inconvenience to individuals must often be incurred for the sake of general national benefit.
On this broad and extensive argument, which can only be supported against any improvements by insisting that the primitive state of humanity, with all its needs, ignorance, brutality, and hardships, is better than the social interactions and division of labor that we typically prefer, it may be enough to point out that it involves both reasoning and evidence, as well as experimentation. Referring to the facts, while it must be acknowledged that new improvements, which alter the habits of the less fortunate, may initially subject them to temporary discomfort and distress, it is only fair that society should protect them from this. Nevertheless, the consistent outcome of such improvements is always an enhancement of human conditions. A short-term inconvenience for individuals is often necessary for the greater national good.
It is to manufactories carried on by machinery and to the abridgment of labour, that this country is indebted for her riches, her independence and pre-eminent station among the nations of the world.
It is thanks to factories run by machines and the reduction of labor that this country owes its wealth, independence, and leading position among the nations of the world.
But let us return to the subject.—The progress of the new mode of lighting with coal-gas can never wholly supersede the use of candles and moveable lights. The objection with regard to the Greenland trade is equally futile. This traffic, might with more propriety be called a drain, than a nursery, of the naval force. The nature of the Greenland service requires that the crew should consist chiefly of able-bodied sailors; and being protected men, not subject to the impress law, they are thus rendered useless for national defence. The nursery of British seamen is the coasting trade; and if the gas-light illumination be put in practice to a large extent, it will increase that trade as much as it will diminish the Greenland fishery.
But let's get back to the topic. The advancement of using coal gas for lighting will never completely replace candles and portable lights. The argument regarding the Greenland trade is just as pointless. This trade could more accurately be referred to as a drain on, rather than a source for, the naval force. The nature of the Greenland service requires that the crew mainly consists of able-bodied sailors; and since they are protected individuals, not subject to the impressment law, they become ineffective for national defense. The real source of British seamen is the coasting trade; and if gas lighting is widely adopted, it will boost that trade just as much as it will reduce the Greenland fishery.
Even on the extreme supposition that it would annihilate the Greenland fisheries altogether, we should have no reason to regret the event. The soundest principles of political[141] economy must condemn the practice of fitting out vessels to navigate the polar seas for oil, if we can extract a superior material for procuring light at a cheaper rate from the produce of our own soil.
Even if it completely wiped out the Greenland fisheries, we shouldn't regret that. The best principles of economic policy would condemn sending ships to the polar seas for oil if we can obtain a better material for light at a lower cost from our own land.
Indeed the fisheries will find ample encouragement, and the consequence of lighting our streets with gas can prove injurious only to our continental friends, one of whose staple commodities, tallow, we shall then have less occasion to purchase.
Indeed, the fisheries will receive plenty of support, and the result of lighting our streets with gas can only harm our continental friends, one of whose main products, tallow, we will then have less need to buy.
There will be less waste indeed, but a greater consumption of coal. The lower classes of the community are at present very scantily supplied with firing; and nothing but a reduction of price is necessary to increase to a very large amount the whole average quantity of fuel consumed in the country. The lightness of the coke produced in the gas-light manufacture diminishing the expence of land carriage, will facilitate its general diffusion—the comforts of the poor will be materially augmented, and a number of useful operations in agriculture and the arts be carried on, which are now checked and impeded by the price of fuel.
There will definitely be less waste, but there will be a higher demand for coal. Right now, the lower-income members of the community have very limited access to heating; all that’s needed to significantly increase the overall amount of fuel used across the country is a drop in prices. The lighter coke produced in gas-light manufacturing will reduce transportation costs, making it more widely available. This will improve the lives of the poor and allow for many beneficial activities in farming and the arts that are currently hindered by fuel costs.
If any additional want were wanted for the[142] coke it will readily be found in the continental market; coke being much better suited than coal to the habits of most European nations.
If anyone needs more coke, it can easily be found in the[142] continental market, since coke is much better suited to the habits of most European nations than coal.
The gas-light illumination cannot tend to diminish the coal-trade; on the contrary it will prove beneficial to it; it will contribute to lower the price of the superior kinds of coal, and keep a level which cannot be shaken under any circumstances; it will contribute to prevent combinations which do certainly operate to the prejudice of the public, and do sometimes put this great town at the mercy of particular proprietors in the north, who deal out coal in the way they please. The competition thus produced, it is impossible not to consider as an advantage, which would prevent in future such combinations, and put those in London out of the reach of them.
The gaslight won't hurt the coal trade; in fact, it will help it. It will help lower the prices of higher-quality coal and keep them stable no matter what happens. It will also help stop collusion that harms the public and sometimes puts this big city at the mercy of certain suppliers up north, who sell coal however they want. This competition is clearly a benefit, as it will prevent such collusion in the future and shield those in London from it.
It is worthy observation, that the annual importation of coal into this Metropolis, is above one million and eighty-eight thousand chaldrons.[31]
It’s worth noting that the yearly import of coal into this city exceeds one million and eighty-eight thousand chaldrons.[31]
[31] To give an idea how long there is a probability of Great Britain being applied with coal from the rivers Tyne and Wear only, it must be observed,
[31] To give an idea of how long there’s a chance of Great Britain relying on coal from just the rivers Tyne and Wear, it should be noted,
1st. That the Seams of coal which are now worked at Newcastle and Sunderland, are equal to a seam or bed of 15 miles by 20 miles.
1st. The coal seams currently being mined at Newcastle and Sunderland cover an area of 15 miles by 20 miles.
2dly. That this seam, on an average, is at least four feet and a half thick.
2dly. That this seam is, on average, at least four and a half feet thick.
3dly, That 1-6th part of the above extent is sufficient for pillars to support the roofs of the mines, &c.
3dly, That one-sixth portion of the above extent is enough for pillars to support the roofs of the mines, etc.
And, 4thly, It appears, by experiments, that a cubic yard of coal weighs 1 ton, or 20 cwt.
And, 4thly, experiments show that a cubic yard of coal weighs 1 ton, or 20 cwt.
London Chaldrons | |
The total consumption of coal from the rivers Tyne and Wear known from the register to be | 2,300,000 |
The number of tons in the above quantity taking the London chaldron at 27 cwt. is | 3,100,000 |
Now a ton weight of coal is estimated to occupy in the earth the space of one cubic yard. | |
The number of cubic yards in the square mile is | 3,097,600 |
The beds or seams of coal are, on an average, 4 feet and a half in thickness, which increases the above number of cubic yards in the square mile by half the number of square yards to | 1,548,800 |
And hence the square mile of the beds or seams of coal we are describing contains, of cubic yards and tons of coal | 4,645,000 |
A deduction of 1-6th for pillars to support the mine, &c. | 800,000 |
The number of tons per square mile | 5,445,000 |
We have already mentioned the length and breadth of the seams of coal to be equal to 20 miles by 15, making an area of 300 square miles, and consequently a source of consumption for 375 years.
We have already noted that the dimensions of the coal seams are 20 miles by 15, covering an area of 300 square miles, providing enough supply for 375 years.
It may be objected to the universality of our conclusion, that the price of coals, differing very much in different places, will occasion a variation in the expence of the new mode of[144] illumination. But there are two reasons why this should have less place, because we find, in Mr. Murdoch’s statement, page 69, that of 600l. the estimated yearly expence of lighting the cotton mill, 550l. consist of interest of capital, and tear and wear of apparatus, leaving the cost of coal only 50l. a sum so trifling, when we reflect that it replaces 2000l. worth of candles, that the price of coal, even where it is highest, can but slightly affect the general profits.[32]
It may be argued that the universality of our conclusion is flawed because the price of coal varies significantly in different locations, which would affect the cost of the new method of[144] illumination. However, there are two reasons why this concern is less relevant. First, in Mr. Murdoch’s statement, page 69, we see that out of an estimated yearly expense of 600 pounds for lighting the cotton mill, 550 pounds is for capital interest and wear and tear of equipment, leaving only 50 pounds for coal. This amount is quite small, especially considering that it replaces candles worth 2000 pounds, meaning that even at the highest coal prices, it has minimal impact on overall profits.[32]
2dly, The coal, by yielding the gas and other products,—namely, tar, pitch, ammoniacal liquor, &c. of which we have treated already, is converted into a substance, increased in bulk, and in the power of producing heat, namely, coke; and as a manufactory generally requires heating as well as lighting, there will be a gain both ways. The manufacturer, by distilling his coal, instead of burning it as it comes from the pit, will save his candles and improve his fuel. One effort at the outset, in erecting a proper apparatus, will reduce his annual disbursement, for these two articles of prime necessity,[145] much in the same manner, (though in a far greater degree) as the farmer gains by building a thrashing machine and laying aside the use of the flail.
Secondly, the coal, by producing gas and other products—like tar, pitch, ammoniacal liquor, etc., which we've already discussed—gets transformed into a substance that takes up more space and generates more heat, specifically coke. Since a manufacturing facility typically needs heating as well as lighting, this results in benefits in both areas. By distilling his coal instead of burning it directly from the mine, the manufacturer will save on candles and enhance his fuel. A single investment upfront in setting up the right equipment will cut down his yearly expenses for these two essential items, [145] much like how a farmer benefits from investing in a threshing machine instead of using a flail.
The principal expence in the pursuit of this branch of civil and domestic economy is therefore the dead capital employed in erecting the machinery destined for preparing and conveying the gas; the floating or live capital is comparatively small. At the same time, were we to offer an advice to the public on this subject, it would be, that no private individual resident in London should attempt to light his premises for the sake of economy with coal-gas by means of his own apparatus, whose annual expence for light does not exceed 60l. because the expence of erecting and attending a small apparatus is almost as great as one constructed on a larger scale would be. For if the quantity of gas wanted is not sufficient to keep the retorts continually in a red-hot or working state, the cost of the gas will be considerably enhanced; because either the empty retorts must be continued red-hot, or the fire must be suffered to go out; and the retorts, when cold, cannot be[146] brought to a working state, that is to say, be made red hot again, but at a considerable expence of fuel, which must be wasted to no purpose. Whereas, if the retorts are constantly kept red hot and in action, one half of the coal necessary to produce a given quantity of gas will then be saved. But when a street, or a small neighbourhood is wanted to be lighted, and the retorts can always be kept in a working state, that is to say, red hot, the operation may be commenced with safety; because the sum required for erecting the apparatus, and the labour attending it, together with the interest of money sunk, will then soon be liquidated by the light which it will afford.
The main expense in pursuing this aspect of civil and domestic economy is the fixed capital used to build the machinery for producing and distributing gas; the variable or operating costs are relatively low. At the same time, if we were to give advice to the public about this matter, it would be that no private individual living in London should try to light their premises using coal gas with their own setup, if their annual lighting costs do not exceed £60. This is because the cost of installing and maintaining a small setup is almost as high as that of a larger one. If the amount of gas needed isn't enough to keep the retorts hot or operational at all times, the gas costs will increase significantly. This is because either the empty retorts must stay hot, or the fire has to be allowed to go out. When the retorts cool down, they can't be reactivated—made hot again—without a significant waste of fuel. However, if the retorts are kept hot and in use continuously, half the amount of coal needed to produce a certain quantity of gas can be saved. But when lighting a street or a small neighborhood, and if the retorts can be kept operational, meaning hot, the process can start safely. The total amount needed to set up the apparatus, along with the labor involved and the interest on the capital invested, will quickly be recovered through the light it provides.
Individuals, therefore, may engage in the distillation of coal, and trade with advantage in the articles produced by that process, and the lighting of cities may be accomplished without the aid of incorporated bodies; and parishes may be lighted by almost as many individuals as there are streets in a parish.
Individuals can, therefore, distill coal and profit from the products created by that process. Cities can be lit without the need for formal organizations, and almost as many individuals as there are streets in a parish can provide lighting for those areas.
From experiments, made by Mr. Clegg, on the effects produced by a number of gas-lights, of a certain intensity, there is reason to believe[147] that the streets of small towns might be illuminated at a cheaper rate, by means of a tower, or pagoda, furnished with gas-lamps, than can be done in the ordinary way by street lamps: the gas being conducted to the top of the building from the apparatus below, and the light directed down again, upon the objects to be illuminated, by means of reflectors placed at a certain angle. By this contrivance, all the main pipes which convey the gas through the streets, as well as those collateral ones that branch out from them to the street lamps, would be saved, and thus compensate for the expense of the tower.
From experiments conducted by Mr. Clegg on the effects produced by various gas lights of a specific intensity, there is reason to believe[147] that the streets of small towns could be lit more cheaply using a tower or pagoda equipped with gas lamps than through the traditional street lamps. The gas would be routed to the top of the structure from the equipment below, and the light would be directed down onto the areas needing illumination using reflectors set at a certain angle. This setup would eliminate the need for all the main pipes that deliver gas throughout the streets, as well as the smaller pipes branching off to the street lamps, thereby offsetting the cost of the tower.
The most beneficial application of gas-lights unquestionably is in all those situations where a great quantity of light is wanted in a small place: and where light is required to be most diffused, the advantages of this mode of illumination are the least.—Hence, as already stated, the lighting of the parish, or street-lamps only, without lighting shops or houses, can never be accomplished with economy.
The best use of gas lights is definitely in situations where a lot of light is needed in a small area. However, when light needs to be spread out the most, this type of lighting isn’t as beneficial. Therefore, as mentioned before, lighting the parish or street lamps alone, without lighting shops or homes, will never be cost-effective.
We have noticed before the reason why the price of coals can have little effect upon the gas-light; because the very refuse, or small[148] coals, called slack, which pass through the screen at the pit’s mouth, and which cannot be brought into the market—nay, even the sweepings of the pit, which are thrown away, may be employed for the production of coal-gas. It makes no difference in what form the coal is used, and this circumstance may contribute to enable the coal-merchant to furnish coals in larger masses, and as they come from the mine, instead of increasing the bulk by breaking them into a smaller size,[33] which is a practice commonly[149] adhered to. This unquestionably reduces the value of coals; because the quantity of radiant heat generated in the combustion of a given quantity of any kind of fuel depends much upon the management of the fire, or upon the manner in which the fuel is consumed. When the fire burns bright, much radiant heat will be sent off from it; but when[150] it is smothered up, very little will be generated: most of the heat produced will then be expended in giving elasticity to a thick dense vapour, or smoke, which is seen rising from the fire; and the combustion being very incomplete, the carburetted hidrogen gas of the coal being driven up the chimney without being inflamed, the fuel is wasted to little purpose.
We’ve previously pointed out why the price of coal has little effect on gas lighting. The leftover bits or small coals, known as slack, that fall through the screen at the mine entrance and can’t be sold—even the sweepings from the pit that are discarded—can be used to produce coal gas. It doesn't matter how the coal is utilized, and this could help the coal merchant supply larger quantities straight from the mine instead of breaking them down into smaller sizes, which is a common practice. This definitely lowers the value of coal because the amount of radiant heat produced when burning any type of fuel largely depends on how the fire is managed and how the fuel is consumed. When the fire burns brightly, it gives off a lot of radiant heat. However, when the fire is smothered, only a little heat is generated; most of the heat will then go into creating a thick, dense vapor or smoke rising from the fire. As a result, the combustion is very incomplete, and the carburetted hydrogen gas from the coal escapes up the chimney unlit, wasting the fuel pretty much entirely.
[33] It is not generally apprehended, how very wasteful the use of small coals is in the ordinary open fire-grates. Necessity makes us use the poker very much, particularly, when the coals are small; and habit prevails even when they are large. By the constant stirring of the fire almost the whole of the small coal passes through the bars; and consequently a great deal goes to the dust-hole without being burnt at all. To prove this, we need only take a shovel full of ashes and put them into a pail, and then pouring water over them, which being gently run off, will carry away nearly all the light and burnt parts: and leave an astonishing quantity of bright unburnt coal, which has escaped from the fire-place, in consequence of being small.
[33] It's not widely understood how wasteful using small coals is in regular open fire grates. We often have to use the poker, especially when the coals are small, and this habit continues even with larger ones. Constantly stirring the fire causes almost all the small coal to fall through the bars, which means a lot ends up going to the dust hole without being burned at all. To demonstrate this, we can take a shovel full of ashes and put them into a bucket; then, when we pour water over them, gently letting it run off, we’ll find that nearly all the light and burnt parts are carried away, leaving an astonishing amount of bright unburnt coal that escaped from the fireplace simply because it was small.
When the grate of the fire-place is large, and the small coals are thrown behind; or when we can have patience enough to bear the cold for an hour or two, or contrive to have the fire lighted a long time before we want it, the small coal may be of some use, but the fire made with it is never strong, nor so bright; and does not burn so long as a fire made with large or round coals: it often requires the help of the poker, and produces a great quantity of breeze.
When the fireplace grate is big, and the small coals are pushed to the back; or when we can manage to endure the cold for an hour or two, or plan to light the fire well in advance, the small coal can be somewhat useful. However, the fire made with it is never strong or bright, and it doesn’t last as long as a fire made with larger or round coals. It often needs the assistance of a poker and creates a lot of smoke.
The loss in the use of small coals is more considerable to the poor, who cannot keep large fires. When they want their breakfast or dinner, the time they can spare is limited; and to have their water sooner boiling, or their meals quicker ready; they must make use of the poker, and lose a great deal of coal. This fact is so evident, that any body who wishes to make the experiment before recommended, will find that much more bright coal goes to the dust-hole of the poor man, than to the dust-hole of a rich family, where, the fire-place being large, the small coal has more chance of burning.
The loss in using small coal affects the poor more significantly, as they can’t afford to keep big fires. When they want breakfast or dinner, their time is limited; to boil water faster or get meals ready more quickly, they end up using the poker and wasting a lot of coal. This is so obvious that anyone who tries the experiment previously suggested will see that a lot more good coal ends up as waste for the poor than for a wealthy family, where the bigger fireplace gives the small coal a better chance to burn.
The loss is still greater to the poor, in consequence of the inferior sorts of coal which are sold to them. If it is the light sort, it burns too quick, and they consume double the quantity; if the strong sort, it burns too slow, and is nearly as wasteful; for a great quantity of it then goes to the dust-hole without having been lighted at all.
The loss is even worse for the poor because they get stuck with lower quality coal. If they buy the lighter type, it burns too fast, and they end up using twice as much. If they buy the stronger type, it burns too slowly and is almost as wasteful since a lot of it ends up in the dustbin without ever being lit.
An incorrect opinion is often entertained, that the real quantity of coal contained in a sack is lessened by separating or screening the small from the round coals; but we must recollect, that any compact body occupies less space than is required to contain the same matter, reduced to smaller irregular pieces, or to powder.—Now the screening only takes away the finest dusty part of the coals, and admits more small pieces of round coals to be filled into the sack.
A common misconception is that the actual amount of coal in a sack decreases when you separate or screen the small pieces from the larger ones. However, we need to remember that a solid mass takes up less space than the same material when it's broken down into smaller irregular pieces or powder. Screening only removes the finest dust from the coal while allowing more small round pieces to fit into the sack.
Nothing can be more perfectly devoid of common sense, and wasteful and slovenly at the same time, than the manner in which chimney fires, where coals are burnt, are commonly managed by servants. They throw on a load of (perhaps all small) coals at once, through which the flame is hours in making its way; and frequently it is not without much care and trouble that the fire is prevented from going quite out. During this time no heat is communicated to the room; and, what is still worse, the throat of the chimney being occupied merely by a heavy dense vapour, not possessed of any heating power, and, consequently, not having much elasticity, the warm air of the room finds less difficulty in forcing its way up the chimney and escaping,[151] than when the fire burns bright, and the coal-gas is ignited. And it happens not unfrequently, especially in chimnies and fire-places ill-constructed, that this current of warm air from the room which presses into the chimney, crossing upon the current of heavy smoke and aqueous vapour which escapes slowly from the fire, obstructs it in its ascent, and beats it back into the room. Hence it is that chimnies so often smoke when too large a quantity of fresh coals is put upon the fire. So many coals should never be put on the fire at once as to prevent the free passage of the flame between them, or to prevent them becoming quickly heated, so as to give out the carburetted hidrogen gas which they are capable of furnishing, and to cause it to be inflamed, In short, a fire should never be smothered: and when attention is paid to the quantity of coals put on, there is little use for the poker; and this circumstance will contribute much to cleanliness, and the preservation of furniture.
Nothing is more lacking in common sense, and more wasteful and careless at the same time, than how servants typically manage chimney fires where coals are burned. They dump a whole load of (usually all small) coals at once, causing the flames to take hours to find their way through. Often, it takes a lot of care and effort to keep the fire from going completely out. Meanwhile, no heat is produced for the room; and, even worse, the throat of the chimney is filled only with a heavy, dense vapor that doesn't generate heat and lacks much elasticity, allowing the warm air from the room to escape up the chimney more easily than when the fire is burning brightly and the coal gas is ignited. It frequently happens, especially in poorly constructed chimneys and fireplaces, that the warm air from the room pushes into the chimney, colliding with the sluggish smoke and watery vapor escaping from the fire, which obstructs its upward movement and pushes it back into the room. This is why chimneys often smoke when too many fresh coals are added to the fire. You should never put so many coals on the fire at once that they block the flame from moving freely between them or prevent them from heating up quickly enough to release the combustible hydrogen gas they can produce and ignite it. In short, a fire should never be smothered; and when attention is given to the amount of coals added, the poker is largely unnecessary, which will help uphold cleanliness and protect furniture.[151]
The author of a paper in the Plain Dealer asserts, that, of the various perversions of abilities, there is none that makes a human being more ridiculous, than that of attempting[152] to stir a fire without judgment; to prevent which he lays down the following rules:—1. Stirring of a fire is of use, because it makes a hollow where, the air being rarefied by the adjacent heat, the surrounding air rushes into this hollow, and gives life and support to the fire, and carries the flame with it. 2. Never stir a fire when fresh coals are laid on, particularly when they are very small, because they immediately fall into the hollow place, and therefore ruin the fire. 3. Always keep the bottom bars clear. 4. Never begin to stir the fire at the top, unless when the bottom is quite clear, and the top only wants breaking.
The author of an article in the Plain Dealer argues that among the many ways people misuse their abilities, there's nothing more foolish than trying to stir a fire without sense. To avoid this, he provides the following rules: 1. Stirring a fire is useful because it creates a hollow space where, due to the heat, the air becomes less dense and rushes in, feeding the fire and carrying the flames with it. 2. Never stir a fire when new coals are added, especially small ones, because they will immediately collapse into the hollow and ruin the fire. 3. Always keep the bottom bars clear. 4. Never start stirring the fire from the top unless the bottom is completely clear and the top only needs breaking.
There is one subject more on which it is necessary to speak.—In the present instance, the public has been alarmed by representations that the general adoption of gas-lights would expose us to innumerable accidents, from the inflammable nature of the gas, and the explosion of the apparatus in which it is prepared, or the bursting of the pipes by which it is conveyed. But there is no ground for such fears.
There’s one more topic we need to address. Right now, the public is worried because they’ve heard that widely using gas lights could lead to countless accidents due to the flammable nature of the gas, potential explosions of the equipment used to produce it, or the pipes carrying it bursting. However, there’s no reason to be afraid of these concerns.
Those who are familiar with the subject will readily allow, that there is no more risk[153] in the action of a gas-light machinery, properly constructed, than there is in the action of a steam-engine, built on just principles.
Those who know about the topic will easily agree that there's no more risk in operating gas-light machinery, when it's built correctly, than there is in running a steam engine designed on sound principles.
The manufacture of the coal-gas requires nothing more than what the most ignorant person, with a common degree of care and attention, is competent to perform. The heating of the gas-furnace, the charging of the retorts with coal, the closing them up air-tight, the keeping them red-hot, and discharging them again, are the only operations required in this art; and these, surely, demand no more skill than a few practical lessons can teach to the meanest capacity. The workman is not called upon to exercise his own judgment, because, when the fire is properly managed, the evolution of the gas goes on spontaneously, and without further care, till all the gas is extricated from the coal.
The production of coal gas doesn't require anything more than what even the least knowledgeable person, with a basic level of care and attention, can handle. Heating the gas furnace, loading the retorts with coal, sealing them tightly, keeping them red-hot, and then unloading them are the only processes needed in this task; and surely, these steps don't require more skill than a few practical lessons can provide to anyone. The worker doesn’t need to use their own judgment because, when the fire is properly controlled, the gas is produced automatically, without any extra effort, until all the gas is released from the coal.
No part of the machinery is liable to be out of order,—there are no cocks to be turned, no valves to be regulated; nor can the operator derange the apparatus but by the most violent efforts. And when the stock of gas is prepared, we may depend on its lighting power as much[154] as we depend on the light to be obtained from a certain number of candles or oil-lamps.
No part of the machine is likely to break down—there are no knobs to turn, no valves to adjust; and the operator can't mess up the system except with extreme force. And once the gas is ready, we can rely on its lighting ability just as much[154] as we trust the light from a specific number of candles or oil lamps.
The diversified experiments which have been made by different individuals, unconnected with each other, have sufficiently established the perfect safety of the new lights; and numerous manufactories might be named in which the gas-lights have now been in use for upwards of seven years, where nothing like an accident has occurred, though the apparatus in all of them is entrusted to the most ignorant man.
The various experiments conducted by different people, who are not connected in any way, have clearly shown that the new lights are completely safe. Many factories could be mentioned where gas lights have been in use for over seven years without any incidents, even though the equipment is handled by the least experienced individuals.
It would be easy to state the causes which have given rise to some of those accidents that have spread alarm amongst the public; but of this it is not my business to speak at length. It is sufficient, on the present occasion, to state, that those melancholy occurrences which have happened at some gas-light establishments which I have had an opportunity of examining, were totally occasioned by egregious failures committed in the construction of the machinery. Thus, an explosion very lately took place in a manufactory lighted with coal-gas, in consequence of a large quantity of gas escaping into a[155] building, where it mingled with common air, and was set on fire by the approach of a lighted candle. That such an accident could happen, is an evident proof that the machinery was erected by a bungler, unacquainted with the most essential principles of this art; because such an accident might have been effectually prevented, by adapting a waste pipe to the gasometer and gasometer house. By this means, if more gas had been prepared than the gasometer would contain, the superfluous quantity could never have accumulated, but would have been transported out of the building into the open air, in as an effectual manner as the waste-pipe of a water cistern conveys away the superfluous quantity of water, when the cistern is full. Such an expedient did not form part of the machinery.
It would be easy to list the causes behind some of the accidents that have caused public alarm; however, that's not my focus right now. For this occasion, it’s enough to say that the unfortunate events that have occurred at some gas light facilities I’ve looked at were entirely due to serious mistakes made in the machinery's construction. Recently, an explosion happened in a factory powered by coal gas because a large amount of gas escaped into a[155] building, where it mixed with regular air and was ignited by a nearby lighted candle. The fact that such an accident could occur clearly shows that the machinery was set up by someone inexperienced, who didn't understand the fundamental principles of this field; this kind of incident could have been easily avoided by adding a waste pipe to the gasometer and gasometer house. With this setup, if there was more gas produced than the gasometer could hold, the excess would not have built up but would have been directed outside into the open air, similar to how a waste pipe in a water tank pushes out extra water when the tank is full. Unfortunately, this kind of solution was not part of the machinery.
Other instances might be named, where explosions have been occasioned through egregious mistakes having been committed in the erection of the gas-light machinery, were this a subject on which I meant to treat.
Other examples could be mentioned where explosions occurred due to serious mistakes made in setting up the gas-light equipment, if this were a topic I intended to discuss.
That the coal-gas, when mixed with a certain portion of common air, in close vessels, may be inflamed by the contact of a lighted[156] body, as has been stated, page 98, is a fact sufficiently known. But the means of preventing such an occurrence in the common application of gas-lights, are so simple, easy, and effectual, that it would be ridiculous to dread danger where there is nothing to be apprehended. In speaking thus of the safety of the gas-light illumination, I do not mean to deny that no possible circumstances may occur where the coal-gas may be the cause of accident. It is certain that the gas, when suffered to accumulate in large quantities in close and confined places, where there is no current of air, such as in cellars, vaults, &c. and where it can mix with common air, and remain undisturbed, that it may be liable to take fire when approached by a lighted body; but I do not see how it is probable that such an accumulation of gas should take place in the apartments of dwelling houses. The constant current of air which passes continually through the rooms, is sufficient to prevent the possibility of such an accumulation ever to take place. And with regard to the bursting of the pipes which convey the gas, no accident can possibly happen from that quarter; because the[157] gas which passes through the whole range of pipes sustains a pressure equal to the perpendicular weight of about one inch of water only, and such a weight of course is insufficient to burst iron pipes. Nor could the town when illuminated by gas-lights, be thrown suddenly into darkness, as has been asserted might happen by the fracture of a main pipe, supposing such an event should take place; because the lateral branches, which supply the street-lamps and houses, are supplied by more than one main; and the consequence of a fracture would be only an extinction of the few lamps in the immediate vicinity of the broken pipe, because the rest of the pipes, situated beyond the fracture, would continue to be supplied with gas from the other mains, as will become obvious from the sketch exhibited in the next page.
That coal gas, when mixed with a certain amount of regular air in enclosed spaces, can ignite when it comes into contact with a lit object, as mentioned, page 98, is a well-known fact. However, the methods to prevent such incidents in everyday gas lighting are simple, easy, and effective, making it ridiculous to fear danger where there isn’t any. When I talk about the safety of gas lighting, I don’t mean to deny that there could be circumstances where coal gas might cause an accident. It’s true that if gas accumulates in large amounts in closed and confined spaces, like cellars and vaults, where there’s no airflow, mixing with regular air without disturbance, it might catch fire if a lit object gets too close; but I don’t see how such gas buildup could happen in residential areas. The constant airflow through the rooms is enough to prevent any accumulation. Regarding the breaking of pipes that carry the gas, no accidents could occur from that, because the gas traveling through the pipes is under a pressure equal to the weight of just one inch of water, which is not enough to burst iron pipes. Also, if a town using gas lights were to suddenly go dark, as some have claimed might happen if a main pipe broke, it wouldn’t be the case; the lateral branches that supply street lamps and homes come from multiple mains. Therefore, if a main were to break, the result would only be the extinguishing of a few lamps close to the break, since other pipes beyond the break would still receive gas from the other mains, as illustrated in the sketch on the next page.
Main pipe, leading from the Gas-light station or
apparatus,
situated in Brick Lane, near Old St.[34]
Main pipe, leading from the gaslight station or equipment,
located on Brick Lane, close to Old St.[34]

* The gasometer at this place is equal in capacity to 22000 cubic feet.
Understood! Please provide the text you want me to modernize. The gasometer here has a capacity of 22,000 cubic feet.
† The capacity of the gasometer here is equal to 15928 cubic feet.
† The gasometer's capacity here is 15,928 cubic feet.
‡ At this station the gasometer is equal in capacity to 14808 cubic feet.
‡ At this station, the gasometer has a capacity of 14,808 cubic feet.
The black lines represent the gas-light mains, or largest pipes, from which the smaller pipes branch off: they are connected with each other at the places marked A B C; and the dotted lines represent the smaller mains, or collateral branches before-mentioned. The main pipes are all furnished with valves, or cocks, placed at about 100 feet distant from each other. Now let us suppose that a main pipe, in any part of the street marked in the sketch, Pall Mall, should break, it is evident, on mere inspection, that the gas which is[159] passing through the main in the Strand, and which is also connected with the main in the Haymarket, Piccadilly, and Coventry Street, would continue to supply the broken pipe, and the valve nearest to the fracture being shut, would prevent the loss of any considerable quantity of gas, and the few lamps situated between the two valves and the fracture would therefore only become extinguished.
The black lines represent the gas light main lines, or the largest pipes, from which smaller pipes branch off: they connect at the points marked A, B, and C; the dotted lines represent the smaller mains or previously mentioned branches. All the main pipes have valves, or taps, spaced about 100 feet apart. Now, let's say that a main pipe in any part of the street shown in the sketch, Pall Mall, breaks. It's clear, just from looking at it, that the gas flowing through the main in the Strand, which is also connected to the mains in Haymarket, Piccadilly, and Coventry Street, would keep supplying the broken pipe. By closing the valve nearest to the break, we can prevent a significant loss of gas, and the few lamps located between the two valves and the break would only go out.
Further, let us suppose a main pipe should break in Piccadilly; in that case, the valve being shut on each side of the fracture, the gas would be supplied from the mains in the Haymarket and St. James’s Street. And the same effect would be produced in any part of the town, supplied with gas-pipes. Besides all this, in the statement thus far given, we have assumed that all the gas-light mains are supplied with gas from one manufacturing station only, but which in reality is not the case. The range of pipes that convey the gas is connected with three gas-light establishments, situated at different parts of the town; and the gas which is supplied from these stations is connected with the whole system of pipes in the[160] streets.[37] If, therefore, one of the manufactories should be annihilated, it would make no difference, because the lights would be amply supplied from the other two manufacturing stations. Hence it is obvious, that the fracture of any of the gas-light mains, or even the total destruction of one or more of the manufactories themselves, would be attended with no serious consequence; and as the system of lighting with gas becomes more extended, the manufactories, or stations for supplying it, will also be multiplied, to give effect and security to the whole.
Furthermore, let's say a main gas pipe breaks in Piccadilly; in that case, with the valves shut on either side of the break, gas would be provided from the mains in the Haymarket and St. James’s Street. The same result would happen anywhere else in the town that has gas pipes. Additionally, so far in this discussion, we've assumed that all gas mains are fed from a single manufacturing station, but that's not actually true. The network of pipes carrying the gas is linked to three gas manufacturing plants located in different areas of the town, and the gas supplied from these stations is integrated into the overall system of pipes in the [160] streets.[37] Therefore, if one of the manufacturing plants were to be destroyed, it wouldn't matter because the lights would still have plenty of supply from the other two stations. It's clear that a break in any of the gas mains, or even the complete shutdown of one or more of the manufacturing plants, wouldn't lead to any serious issues; and as the gas lighting system expands, the number of manufacturing stations will also increase to enhance effectiveness and safety across the board.
In fact, no danger can arise from the application of gas-lights in any way, but what is common to candle-light, and lamps of all kinds, and is the fault of none of them. Even in this case the gas-lights are less hazardous. There is no risk of those accidents which often happen from the guttering or burning down of candles, or from carelessly snuffing them. The gas-light lamps and burners must necessarily be fixed to one place, and therefore cannot fall, or otherwise become[161] deranged, without being immediately extinguished. Besides, the gas-light flames emit no sparks, nor are any embers detached from them. As a proof of the comparative safety of the gas-lights, it need only be stated, that the Fire-offices engage themselves to insure cotton-mills, and other public works, at a less premium, where gas-lights are used, than in the case of any other lights.[38] The excessive expence of insurance arising from the numerous candles employed in most of the first rate manufactories, and the combustible nature of the structure of the buildings; the great difficulty of retrieving the injury resulting to a well-organised business, from the accidental destruction of the machinery, are objects alone sufficient to furnish the strongest economical,[162] as well as political recommendations, for the adoption of the new lights in all manufactories where work is done by candle-light.
In fact, there’s no danger from using gas lights that isn't also present with candles and lamps of all kinds, and none of them are to blame. In this case, gas lights are actually less risky. There’s no chance of accidents caused by candles dripping or burning down, or from careless snuffing. Gas lamps and burners have to be fixed in one place, so they can’t fall or get moved around without being put out immediately. Plus, gas flames don’t give off sparks, nor do they produce any embers. To prove how much safer gas lights are, it’s enough to mention that insurance companies are willing to insure cotton mills and other public facilities for a lower premium when gas lights are used, compared to any other lighting. The high cost of insurance due to the many candles used in most top-tier factories, along with the flammable construction of the buildings, and the huge challenge of fixing damage caused by the accidental destruction of machinery, are strong economic and political reasons to switch to gas lighting in all factories that currently rely on candle light.
[38] Since the preceding pages have been printed, I have seen a self-extinguishing gas-lamp, invented by Mr. Clegg. This lamp is so constructed, that the gas cannot flow to the burner, when the flame becomes extinguished. If, therefore, the lamp should be blown out, and the stop-cock which supplies the gas be left open, the extinction of the flame will effectually shut the valve. The action of this lamp depends upon the expansibility of a metallic rod, heated by the flame of the lamp, and thus keeping open the valve, whereas, when the lamp is extinguished, and the rod becomes cold, it contracts to its natural dimensions, and, by that means, effectually closes the valve. The same engineer has invented a machine, which both measures and registers, in the absence of the observer, the quantity of gas delivered by any pipe communicating with a gas-light main. The machine occupies a space of about two feet by one foot, and, if put up in a room, house, or other place, where gas is burnt, will, at any time, by mere inspection, give an account of the quantity of gas consumed in that place during any given time. On the present occasion, it would not become me to say more on these subjects, which, no doubt, Mr. Clegg will make known to the public; I shall only remark, that these contrivances do signal honour to the talents and abilities of the inventor; and that they will render the greatest services to those who are engaged in the gas-light illumination.
[38] Since the previous pages were printed, I have seen a self-extinguishing gas lamp invented by Mr. Clegg. This lamp is designed so that gas cannot flow to the burner when the flame goes out. Therefore, if the lamp is blown out and the stopcock supplying gas is left open, the extinguishing of the flame will effectively close the valve. The operation of this lamp relies on the expansion of a metallic rod, which is heated by the lamp's flame and keeps the valve open; when the lamp is out and the rod cools, it contracts to its original size and effectively closes the valve. The same engineer has created a device that measures and records, without the observer present, the amount of gas being supplied by any pipe connected to a gas main. The device takes up about two feet by one foot of space and, if placed in a room, house, or any area using gas, will provide an account of the gas consumption over any specified time with just a quick look. In this instance, it wouldn’t be appropriate for me to say more on these topics, which Mr. Clegg will likely share with the public; I only wish to note that these inventions greatly honor the skills and talents of the inventor and will provide significant assistance to those involved in gas lighting.
After considering the facts so far detailed, many other advantages, connected with the gas-light illumination, will naturally suggest themselves to the reader. I have endeavoured merely to point out the leading characters of the new lights, as they are at present. Ingenious men may speculate from what has been done to what remains to be effected, which, no doubt, will embrace objects of the greatest utility and most extended national importance. The public attention is awakened to the new properties of coal, and will not rest till they are extensively applied to economical purposes. The consequence will be, a considerable[163] defalcation in the revenue. For, in proportion as the gas-lights are more or less generally adopted in all towns of the country, the consumption of oil and tallow will be diminished, and the impost on those articles become less productive; and when this takes place, Government, no doubt, will share in the profits, by levying a tax on the new lights. The Exchequer will thus have nothing to fear; as one branch of the revenue fails, another, and a more productive one, will supply its place.
After looking at the facts presented so far, many other benefits related to gas-lighting will likely come to mind for the reader. I have only aimed to highlight the main features of the new lights as they currently exist. Innovative thinkers may speculate on what has been accomplished and what still needs to be achieved, which will certainly include goals of great usefulness and broad national significance. The public is becoming aware of the new properties of coal and won’t stop until they are widely used for practical purposes. As a result, there will be a significant[163] decline in revenue. Because as gas lights are adopted more widely in towns across the country, the usage of oil and tallow will decrease, leading to a reduction in taxes on those products. When this happens, the Government will likely benefit by imposing a tax on the new lights. The Exchequer thus has nothing to worry about; as one source of revenue diminishes, another, and more profitable one, will take its place.
Upon the whole, when we reflect that the object of the gas-light illumination is to open a source of national wealth, of which nothing can deprive us, to create, we may almost say, new articles of value, its friends cannot be thought guilty of great presumption, if they look forward with confidence to the successful extension of this new art of civil economy; and if, contrary to all expectations, the effects of jealousy and prejudice should, in some respect or other, continue here and there its influence against this new art of procuring light, a firm perseverance of its application must at length remove that ignorance which alone can give them birth.
Overall, when we consider that the goal of gas lighting is to create a source of national wealth that no one can take away from us, to generate what we might almost call new valuables, its supporters can't really be seen as overly presumptuous if they look forward with optimism to the successful growth of this new practice in managing resources; and if, against all odds, jealousy and prejudice still manage to affect it in some way, a strong commitment to using this method will eventually eliminate the ignorance that is responsible for such negativity.
TABULAR VIEW,
EXHIBITING
SHOWING
The quantity of Gas, Coke, Tar, Pitch, Essential Oil, and Ammoniacal Liquor, obtainable from a given quantity of Coal; together with an Estimate of the quantity of Coal necessary to produce a quantity of Gas, capable of yielding a Light equal in duration of time and intensity to that produced by Tallow Candles of different kinds.
The amount of Fuel, Coca-Cola, Tar, Suggest, Essential oil, and Ammonia Solution that can be obtained from a specific amount of Coal; along with an estimate of the amount of Coal needed to produce a quantity of Gas that can provide light equal in duration and intensity to that produced by different types of Tallow Candles.
Cost of Coal. | Weight of Coal. | Produce of Gas, in cubic feet. | - | [39]Equal to as many tallow candles, 12 in the pound, burning two hours; or to | Candles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mini- mum. |
Maxi- mum. |
Aver- age. |
Min. | Max. | Aver. | Min. | Max. | Aver. | 9,516 8,651 |
11 10 |
to the pound. to thdo. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Chal. of Coal, from 25 to 28 cwt. |
- | 40 | s | to | 60 | s | — | 50 | s | 2,800 | to | 3,136 | — | 2,968 | 8,906 | to | 11,872 | — | 10,388 | [39] | 7,786 6,921 6,556 5,194 |
10 9 8 7 |
to thdo. to thdo. to thedo. to thdo. |
|||||||||||||
One Ton | 30 | s | to | 48 | s | — | 38 | s | 6 | d | 2,240 | 6,720 | to | 8,960 | — | 7,840 | 4,325 | 5 | to thdo. | |||||||||||||||||
One Sack | 3 | s | 4 | d | to | 5 | s | — | 4 | s | 2 | d | 233 | to | 261 | — | 247 | 741 | to | 988 | — | 814 | 3,463 | 4 | to thdo. | |||||||||||
One Bushel | 1 | s | 2 | d | to | 1 | s | 8 | d | — | 1 | s | 5 | d | 78 | to | 87 | — | 82 | 1⁄2 | 247 | to | 330 | — | 290 | 2,595 | 3 | to thdo. | ||||||||
One Peck | 3 | 1⁄2 | to | 5 | d | — | 4 | 1⁄4 | 19 | 1⁄2 | to | 21 | 1⁄4 | — | 20 | 1⁄4 | 61 | to | 82 | — | 71 | 1⁄2 | 1,730 | 2 | to thdo. | |||||||||||
One Pound | 1⁄4 | 1 | 3 | to | 4 | — | 3 | 1⁄2 | 866 | 1 | to thdo. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coca-Cola.—One chaldron of coal, from 25 to 28 cwt. gives 11⁄4 to 1½ chaldron of Coke. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asphalt.—One chaldron of coal, from 25 to 28 cwt. gives from 150 to 180lb. of Tar,[39] or 15 to 18 ale gallons, 10lb. each. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ammonia Solution.—One chaldron of coal, gives from 220 to 240lb. of Ammoniacal Liquor, or 22 to 24 ale gallons. |
[39]1000lb. of Coal-Tar afford by distillation, from 260 to 265lb. of Essential Oil, or Naphtha. 1000lb. of Coal-Tar produce by mere evaporation, from 460 to 480lb. of Pitch.
[39]1000 lbs of Coal-Tar yield through distillation about 260 to 265 lbs of Essential Oil or Naphtha. 1000 lbs of Coal-Tar produce through simple evaporation about 460 to 480 lbs of Pitch.
Tabular View, exhibiting the illuminating power of Coal-Gas, compared with the illuminating power of Tallow Candles of different sizes.
Table comparing the brightness of Coal-Gas to the brightness of Tallow Candles of various sizes.
One chaldron of Coal produces, according to weight and quality, | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Burning. | Candles. | 12 to 1lb. | 6 to 1lb. | |||||||
Cubic feet of Gas. | Average. | 1 | hour | = | 21,000 | = | 10,500 | |||
From | 9,000 | to | 12,000 | 10,500 | 2 | hours | = | 10,500 | = | 5,250 |
6,000 | 8,000 | 7,000 | 3 | ditto | = | 7,000 | = | 3,500 | ||
4,500 | 6,000 | 5,250 | 4 | ditto | = | 5,250 | = | 2,625 | ||
3,600 | 4,800 | 4,400 | 5 | ditto | = | 4,400 | = | 2,200 | ||
3,000 | 4,000 | 3,500 | 6 | ditto | = | 3,500 | = | 1,750 | ||
2,571 | 3,428 | 3,005 | 7 | ditto | = | 3,005 | = | 1,502 | ||
2,250 | 3,000 | 2,625 | 8 | ditto | = | 2,625 | = | 1,312 | ||
2,000 | 2,666 | 2,333 | 9 | ditto | = | 2,333 | = | 1,166 | ||
1,800 | 2,100 | 2,100 | 10 | ditto | = | 2,100 | = | 1,050 | ||
1,636 | 2,191 | 1,913 | 11 | ditto | = | 1,913 | = | 956 | ||
1,500 | 2,000 | 1,750 | 12 | ditto | = | 1,750 | = | 875 | ||
1,384 | 1,846 | 1,615 | 13 | ditto | = | 1,615 | = | 807 | ||
1,285 | 1,714 | 1,499 | 14 | ditto | = | 1,499 | = | 749 | ||
1,200 | 1,600 | 1,400 | 15 | ditto | = | 1,400 | = | 700 | ||
1,125 | 1,500 | 1,312 | 16 | ditto | = | 1,312 | = | 656 | ||
1,058 | 1,111 | 1,234 | 17 | ditto | = | 1,234 | = | 617 | ||
1,000 | 1,333 | 1,166 | 18 | ditto | = | 1,166 | = | 583 | ||
947 | 1,263 | 1,105 | 19 | ditto | = | 1,105 | = | 552 | ||
900 | 1,200 | 1,050 | 20 | ditto | = | 1,050 | = | 525 | ||
857 | 1,143 | 1,000 | 21 | ditto | = | 1,000 | = | 500 | ||
818 | 1,095 | 956 | 22 | ditto | = | 956 | = | 478 | ||
783 | 1,044 | 913 | 23 | ditto | = | 913 | = | 456 | ||
750 | 1,000 | 875 | 21 | ditto | = | 875 | = | 437 |
N. B. If it be required to know, for how many hours one pound, or one peck, or one bushel, or one sack, of coal will produce Gas Light equal to that of a certain number of well-snuffed Tallow Candles, the proportion of each of the average weights of a pound, peck, bushel, or sack, to that of the average weight of a chaldron of coal, is as follows:
N. B. If you need to know how many hours one pound, one peck, one bushel, or one sack of coal will produce gas light equivalent to a specific number of well-snuffed tallow candles, the proportion of each of the average weights of a pound, peck, bushel, or sack, compared to the average weight of a chaldron of coal, is as follows:
1 | lb. | = | 2968th | part of a chaldron. | |
One peck | 20 | = | 148th | ditto. | |
One bushel | 82 | = | 36th | ditto. | |
One sack | 248 | = | 12th | ditto. |
Rule.—Divide with either of the above parts of weight, the number of lights opposite to their hours, and the product will be the number of lights burning for the same number of hours.
Rule.—Divide the number of lights by either of the weights mentioned above according to their hours, and the result will be the number of lights that are on for the same duration.
Example.—To know how many lights one peck of coal will give for six hours, divide the 148th part in 3,500, opposite to the number of six hours, the product is almost 24 lights. The same rule holds good for any given quantity or number of pounds of coal, in a chaldron, to find how many lights, or candles, 12 to the lb. or 6 to the lb. they will give for a given number of hours.
Example.—To find out how many lights one peck of coal will produce for six hours, divide the 148th part in 3,500 by the number of six hours; the result is almost 24 lights. The same method applies to any amount or weight of coal in a chaldron to determine how many lights or candles, whether 12 per pound or 6 per pound, they will produce for a specific number of hours.
DESCRIPTION
OF
THE GAS-LIGHT APPARATUS.
PLATE I.
Exhibits a perspective view of a gas-light apparatus,[40] for lighting factories, or small districts of houses. It consists of the following parts: which may be considered separately.
Exhibits a perspective view of a gas-light setup,[40] for lighting factories or small groups of houses. It consists of the following parts, which can be considered separately.
Fig. 1. The Retort Furnace, for distilling the coals. It is built of brick-work. The bricks which are exposed to the immediate action of the fire, are Welch tumps, or fire-bricks; they are bedded in clay, or Windsor loam.
Fig. 1. The Retort Furnace is used for distilling coal. It is made of brick. The bricks that face the flames are Welch tumps or fire-bricks; they are set in clay or Windsor loam.
Fig. 2. The Tar Cistern, to collect the coal-tar, and other condensible products obtained during the distillation of the coals. It is a cast-iron hollow cylinder, closed at the top with a cast-iron cover, which has a very small hole to allow the air to escape as the liquid enters into the vessel.
Fig. 2. The Tar Cistern is designed to collect coal tar and other condensable products obtained during coal distillation. It's a hollow cylinder made of cast iron, sealed at the top with a cast-iron cover that features a tiny hole to let air escape while the liquid flows into the vessel.
Fig. 4. The Gasometer, for collecting and preserving the purified gas, and for distributing and applying it as occasion may require. It consists of two principal parts—namely, a large interior vessel closed at the top and open at the bottom, made of sheet iron, designed to contain the gas, and an outer cistern or vessel, of rather greater capacity, constructed of cast-iron plates, in which the former vessel is suspended. The latter contains the water by which the gas is confined. The interior vessel which contains the gas is suspended by chains hung over wheels or pullies, to which weights are attached, so as to be just sufficient to balance the weight of the gasometer, all but a small difference, and allowing its slow descent in the manner which is found as nearly adapted as can be to the proper supply of the lamps. The weight of the chains must be equal to the specific gravity of the material of which the gasometer is composed, so as to compensate accurately for the quantity of water which the gasometer displaces, or what is the same, it must be equal to the loss of weight which the gasometer sustains, when immersed in the water; and the counterpoise weight must be equal (or nearly so) to the absolute weight of the gasometer.
Fig. 4. The Gasometer is used for collecting and storing the purified gas, as well as for distributing and using it whenever needed. It has two main parts: a large inner vessel that is closed at the top and open at the bottom, made of sheet iron, designed to hold the gas, and an outer cistern or vessel that is slightly larger, built from cast-iron plates, which suspends the inner vessel. The outer vessel contains the water that keeps the gas confined. The inner vessel, which holds the gas, is suspended by chains that run over wheels or pulleys, with weights attached to them, just enough to balance the weight of the gasometer, minus a small difference, allowing it to slowly descend in a way that is ideally suited to supply the lamps. The weight of the chains must equal the specific gravity of the gasometer's material, accurately compensating for the volume of water displaced by the gasometer, or in other words, it must match the loss of weight that the gasometer experiences when it is submerged in water; and the counterweight must be equal to (or nearly equal to) the actual weight of the gasometer.
The action of these different parts of the apparatus will be obvious from the following explanation:
The function of these different parts of the equipment will be clear from the following explanation:
A, A, are two iron retorts, placed horizontally, and side by side, in the furnace; the mouth of the[168] retorts where the coals are introduced, projects into an arched chamber, situated in front of the furnace, as shewn in the drawing by the broken down brick-work. The object of suffering the mouth of the retorts to project into a separate chamber, is merely to discharge with convenience the red hot coke from the retorts when the process is at an end; the coke being suffered to fall to the bottom of the chamber, where it cools, without becoming troublesome to the operator. It may be removed from this fire-safe chamber by the door represented at the end view of the furnace.
A, A, are two iron retorts that are positioned horizontally and next to each other in the furnace. The openings of the[168] retorts, where the coals are added, extend into an arched chamber located in front of the furnace, as shown in the drawing of the damaged brickwork. The reason the openings of the retorts extend into a separate chamber is simply to allow for the convenient discharge of the red-hot coke at the end of the process; the coke falls to the bottom of the chamber, where it cools without causing issues for the operator. It can be taken out from this fire-safe chamber through the door depicted in the end view of the furnace.
When the operation commences, the inner vessel of the gasometer, fig. 4 is sunk down, to expel the air which it contains to a level with the exterior vessel, or outer cistern, of the gasometer; and, consequently, becomes filled with water. As the distillation of the coal in the retorts proceeds, the liquid and gazeous products evolved from the coals are transmitted by means of the perpendicular syphon pipes B, B, into the horizontal pipe or main condenser C, with which they are connected. The liquid which is distilled, collects in the pipe, or main condenser, C, where it is retained until its quantity has risen so high as to discharge itself into the pipe D, which is connected with the upper part of one of the extremities of the condenser, C. One of the extremities of the pipes, B, B, therefore become immersed into the liquid contained in the main condenser or pipe C, whilst the vaporous or condensible fluid, after having overcome the pressure there opposed to it, is transported into the pipe E, which, after passing in a serpentine direction, E, E,[169] &c. through the exterior vessel or cistern of the gasometer, terminates in the tar-vessel, fig. 2. Thus the vaporous fluids are condensed by passing through the serpentine pipe, E, E, &c. and become deposited in the tar-cistern, fig. 2; whilst the non-condensible or gazeous products are made to proceed by the pipe F, which branches off from the pipe E, into the lime machine, fig. 3. In this apparatus the gas, as it is evolved from the coals, comes into contact with slaked lime and water; the object of which is, to strip it of its sulphuretted hydrogen and carbonic acid gas with which it always abounds, and to render it fit for illumination. This being accomplished, the purified gas is conducted away out of the lime machine by means of the pipe G, into the perpendicular pipe H, which branches up through the bottom of the gasometer cistern. The upper extremity of this pipe is covered, in the manner of a hood, by a cylindrical vessel I, open at bottom, but partially immersed beneath the surface of the water contained in the outer cistern of the gasometer, it is also perforated round near the lower edge with a number of small holes. The gas, as it passes out of the pipe H, displaces the water from the receiver I, and escapes through the small holes, and is thus made to pass through the water in the cistern, in which the hood of the pipe I, is partly immersed, so as to expose a large surface to its action, that it may once more be washed, and deprived of all the foreign gazeous products which might have escaped the action of the lime, whilst it was agitated[170] with this substance in the lime machine, fig. 3. After rising through the water in the gasometer cistern, it enters into the gasometer, which then ascends as the gas accumulates in it.
When the operation starts, the inner part of the gasometer, fig. 4, is lowered to expel the air it contains until it's at the same level as the outer vessel or cistern of the gasometer, causing it to fill with water. As the coal is distilled in the retorts, the liquid and gaseous products that come from the coal are sent through the vertical siphon pipes B, B into the horizontal pipe or main condenser C, to which they are connected. The distilled liquid collects in the main condenser pipe C, where it stays until its level is high enough to flow into pipe D, which connects to the upper part of one end of the condenser C. One end of pipes B, B is therefore submerged in the liquid inside the main condenser or pipe C, while the vapor or condensable fluid, after overcoming the opposing pressure, is pushed into pipe E, which winds in a serpentine shape E, E,[169]&c. through the outer vessel or cistern of the gasometer, ending in the tar vessel, fig. 2. This way, the vaporous fluids are condensed as they travel through the serpentine pipe E, E, &c. and settle in the tar cistern, fig. 2; while the non-condensable or gaseous products move via pipe F, which branches from pipe E, to the lime machine, fig. 3. In this setup, the gas that comes from the coal interacts with slaked lime and water, aiming to remove its hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide, which are typically present, making it suitable for lighting. Once this is done, the purified gas is carried out of the lime machine through pipe G, into the vertical pipe H, which rises from the bottom of the gasometer cistern. The top of this pipe is covered like a hood by a cylindrical vessel I, which is open at the bottom but partially submerged under the water in the outer cistern of the gasometer, and has several small holes around the edge. As the gas exits pipe H, it pushes the water out of the receiver I and escapes through the small holes, passing through the water in the cistern where the hood of pipe I is partially submerged. This increases the surface area for interaction, allowing the gas to be washed again and removing any gaseous impurities that might have escaped the lime’s effect while mixed with it in the lime machine, fig. 3. After rising through the water in the gasometer cistern, it enters the gasometer, which then rises as the gas builds up inside.
In this manner the process proceeds, until the whole of the volatile products of the coal in the retort are disengaged. The use of the gasometer is, partly to equalize the evolution of the gas which comes from the retort more quickly at some time than others. When this happens, the vessel rises up to receive it, and when the stream from the retort diminishes, the weight of the gasometer expels its contents, provided the main-cock be open. When the process is finished, the retort is suffered to cool, and its lid is then removed to replenish it with coal. When the main stop-cock is then opened, the gasometer descends, and the gas passes from the gasometer through the pipe K, to the burners, or main pipe, which communicates with the gas burners or lamps. L, is a wooden tub or barrel, containing the mixture of lime and water, for charging the lime machine; and into which the contents of the barrel, L, may be conveyed by the curved pipe M, without admitting common air. N, N, is a water-pipe, to convey fresh water into the gasometer cistern occasionally; because it is essential that the water used for washing and purifying the gas should be changed for fresh as soon as it becomes dirty; and unless this is done, the gas will not be perfectly purified by washing, but produce a disagreeable odour when burnt; the same holds good with regard to the lime[171] machine, the contents of which should be renewed occasionally. This pipe also conveys the necessary water into the barrel, L. O, is a waste-pipe, to convey the water as it becomes impregnated with the impurities of the gas, out of the gasometer cistern. P, is an agitator, to stir up the contents of the lime machine occasionally, Q, Q, are two iron rods, which serve as stays to guide the motion of the gasometer. R, is an index, connected by means of a shaft and pulley with the axis of one of the gasometer wheels. This index is graduated to the capacity of the cubical contents of the gasometer, so as to indicate, by the rising and falling of the gasometer, its relative contents of gas expressed in cubic feet. S, is the waste pipe of the lime machine, to remove the insoluble parts of the lime. T, represents the iron cover, or lid, which is turned on the lathe, and ground air-tight, to close up the mouth of the retort, so as to make readily an air-tight fitting. U is an iron wedge to secure the cover of the retort. The left-hand retort in the design shows the retort closed up, and the cover, or lid of the mouth of it secured by means of the wedge, in its place, so as to render the mouth of the retort perfectly air tight.
In this way, the process goes on until all the volatile products of the coal in the retort are released. The gasometer is used partly to balance the flow of gas that comes from the retort, which can happen more quickly at times than others. When this occurs, the vessel rises to collect it, and when the flow from the retort decreases, the weight of the gasometer pushes out its contents, as long as the main valve is open. Once the process is complete, the retort is allowed to cool, and then the lid is removed to refill it with coal. When the main stopcock is opened, the gasometer drops, and the gas flows from the gasometer through the pipe K to the burners or main pipe, which connects to the gas burners or lamps. L is a wooden tub or barrel that holds a mixture of lime and water for charging the lime machine; the contents of this barrel, L, can be transferred via the curved pipe M without allowing in outside air. N, N is a water pipe that brings fresh water into the gasometer cistern occasionally; this is important because the water used for washing and purifying the gas needs to be replaced with clean water as soon as it gets dirty. If this isn't done, the gas won't be properly purified by washing and will produce an unpleasant smell when burned; the same applies to the lime machine, which should also have its contents replaced now and then. This pipe also supplies necessary water into the barrel, L. O is a waste pipe that drains water from the gasometer cistern as it becomes contaminated with gas impurities. P is an agitator that occasionally stirs the contents of the lime machine. Q, Q are two iron rods that act as supports to guide the movement of the gasometer. R is an index connected via a shaft and pulley to the axis of one of the gasometer wheels. This index is marked to show the gasometer's capacity, indicating, through the rising and falling of the gasometer, its relative gas content measured in cubic feet. S is the waste pipe for the lime machine, removing the insoluble parts of the lime. T represents the iron cover or lid, which is machined and ground to be airtight, sealing the mouth of the retort for a perfect fit. U is an iron wedge that secures the cover of the retort. The left retort in the design shows the retort closed, and the cover, or lid, is secured in place with the wedge, ensuring the mouth of the retort is completely airtight.
There is a safety valve attached to this gasometer which could not be represented in the drawing; and the object of which is, to convey away any portion of gas that might happen to be produced by a careless operator, when the gasometer is full, and which is thus prevented from accumulating in the place where the gasometer is erected. It is represented in[172] the right-hand corner of plate VII. where fig. 1 shows the edge of the gasometer; 2, the surface of the water in the inside of the gasometer; 3, the surface of the water in the outside of the gasometer, or in the cistern; 4, a pipe issuing from the lower edge of the gasometer, and surrounded at its upper extremity with a cup marked 5; 6, the waste pipe, the mouth of which is immersed in water. It is obvious that, when the gasometer is full, if an additional quantity of gas should be attempted to be put into it, it will be transported by means of the pipe 4, into the waste-pipe 6; the upper extremity of which reaches out of the building, and there communicates with the open air.
There is a safety valve on this gasometer that couldn't be shown in the drawing. Its purpose is to release any gas that might be produced by a careless operator when the gasometer is full, preventing it from building up in the area where the gasometer is located. It is shown in[172] the right-hand corner of plate VII. where fig. 1 displays the edge of the gasometer; 2 represents the surface of the water inside the gasometer; 3 shows the surface of the water outside the gasometer or in the cistern; 4 is a pipe coming from the lower edge of the gasometer, topped with a cup marked 5; 6 is the waste pipe, whose opening is submerged in water. It's clear that when the gasometer is full, if more gas is added, it will flow through pipe 4 into the waste pipe 6, which extends outside the building and connects to the open air.
PLATE II.
Represents a Portable experimental Gas Apparatus for exhibiting, in the small way, the general nature of the gas-light illumination.—It is described page 79.
Represents a portable experimental gas apparatus for demonstrating, in a small way, the basic concept of gas-light illumination.—It is described page 79.
PLATES III. IV. V.
PLATE VI.
Fig. 1. Exhibits a design of the gasometer framing, or skeleton, which serves to give stability and strength to the gasometer. It consists of wooden frame work, marked A, A, A, interlaced[173] with iron rods, B, B, B, &c. The whole framing is so disposed that it will float in the cistern horizontally, and therefore keep the gasometer perfectly steady and level with the surface of the water.
Fig. 1. shows a design of the gasometer framing, or skeleton, which provides stability and strength to the gasometer. It consists of a wooden framework, marked A, A, A, interwoven[173] with iron rods, B, B, B, etc. The entire structure is arranged so that it will float in the cistern horizontally, ensuring the gasometer remains perfectly stable and level with the water's surface.
The rest of the sketches represent various kinds of gas pipes employed as mains for conveying the gas, and the methods of connecting them.
The remaining sketches show different types of gas pipes used as mains to transport the gas, along with the methods of connecting them.
Fig. 2. Represents a longitudinal section of a Spigot and Faucet Pipe. These kinds of pipes are applicable in most cases as mains for conveying gas. A, is called the spigot, and B, the faucet. They are joined together, and made air tight, by iron cement, the composition of which is as follows:
Fig. 2. Represents a long view of a Spigot and Faucet Pipe. These pipes are generally used as main lines for transporting gas. A is referred to as the spigot, and B is the faucet. They are connected and sealed tightly using iron cement, which is made up of the following ingredients:
Take two ounces of sal ammoniac, one ounce of flowers of sulphur, and sixteen ounces of cast iron filings or borings. Mix all well together, by rubbing them in a mortar, and keep the powder dry.
Take two ounces of sal ammoniac, one ounce of flowers of sulfur, and sixteen ounces of cast iron filings or shavings. Mix everything well by grinding them in a mortar, and keep the powder dry.
When the cement is wanted for use, take one part of the above powder, and twenty parts of clean iron borings or filings, and blend them intimately by grinding them in a mortar. Wet the compound with water, and when brought to a convenient consistence, apply it to the joints with a wooden or blunt iron spatula.
When you need to use the cement, take one part of the powder mentioned above and mix it with twenty parts of clean iron shavings or filings. Grind them together thoroughly in a mortar. Add water to the mixture, and once it reaches a workable consistency, apply it to the joints using a wooden or blunt iron spatula.
By a play of affinities, which those who are at all acquainted with chemistry will be at no loss to comprehend, a degree of action and re-action takes place among the ingredients, and between them and the iron surfaces, which at last causes the whole to unite as one mass. In fact, after a time, the mixture and the surfaces of the flanches become a species of pyrites (holding a very large[174] proportion of iron,) all the parts of which cohere strongly together.
Through a series of affinities, which anyone familiar with chemistry can easily understand, a certain level of action and reaction occurs among the ingredients, and between them and the iron surfaces, ultimately causing everything to come together as a single mass. In fact, after a while, the mixture and the surfaces of the flanges turn into a type of pyrite (containing a significant amount of iron), all parts of which bond tightly together.
The inner parts of the faucet ought to be no larger in diameter than just to fit the spigot. This supports the pipe, independently of the cement, and prevents the risk of hurting the joint from any external stress. The inner faucet is commonly made about 21⁄2 inches deep, and has the spigot inserted 11⁄2 inch into it. The practice of some workmen, is to make the outer faucet, or that which contains the cement, six inches deep, for all pipes above six inches diameter; and to make the faucets of all pipes below six inches, the same depth as the diameter of the pipes. It is usual to make the space for the cement, all round the spigot, from 1 to 11⁄2 inch; that width is required, in order that the cement may be firmly driven into the joint. When the space is very narrow, this cannot be done. On the other hand, when too wide, there is a waste of cement, and a risk of injury from unequal expansion.
The inner parts of the faucet should be no larger in diameter than just enough to fit the spigot. This supports the pipe independently of the cement and prevents the risk of damaging the joint from any external stress. The inner faucet is typically about 21⁄2 inches deep and has the spigot inserted 11⁄2 inches into it. Some workers practice making the outer faucet, which holds the cement, six inches deep for all pipes over six inches in diameter, and they make the faucets of pipes under six inches the same depth as the diameter of the pipes. It's common to leave a space for the cement around the spigot of 1 to 11⁄2 inches; this width is necessary so that the cement can be firmly packed into the joint. If the space is too narrow, this can't be achieved. Conversely, if it's too wide, there's a waste of cement and a risk of damage due to uneven expansion.
Fig. 3. Exhibits a profile view of these kinds of pipes when joined together. The spigot and faucet pipes are liable to burst from the great expansion of the spigot, and the risk of this accident is increased by increasing the space between the spigot and faucet, which requires to be filled with cement.
Fig. 3. Shows a side view of these types of pipes when connected. The spigot and faucet pipes can break due to the significant expansion of the spigot, and the chance of this happening increases when the gap between the spigot and faucet widens, which needs to be filled with cement.
Fig. 4. Represents a longitudinal section of two flanch pipes, and the modes of connecting them. A and B, show the parts of the pipes; and C and D, the flanches. These pipes are also joined together, and rendered air-tight, by interposing between[175] the flanches rope-yarn, hemp, or some other pliable material, and iron cement, and then screwing up the faces of them by means of the bolts and screw nuts.
Fig. 4. Shows a long section of two flange pipes and how to connect them. A and B indicate the pipe parts; C and D represent the flanges. The pipes are also connected securely and made air-tight by placing rope-yarn, hemp, or another flexible material, along with iron cement, between the flanges, then tightening the faces with bolts and screw nuts.
Fig. 5. Profile view of the same kind of pipes connected together, A and B, the pipes; C and D, the flanches; E and F, the bolts.
Fig. 5. Profile view of the same type of pipes connected together, A and B, the pipes; C and D, the flanges; E and F, the bolts.
Fig. 6. Represents the method of joining spigot and faucet pipes when they are to have a turn or angle. This method is convenient when the place where the turn required to be made is previously known, and the pipes cast accordingly.
Fig. 6. Represents the method for connecting spigot and faucet pipes when they need to bend or angle. This method is useful when the location for the turn is already determined, and the pipes are made accordingly.
Fig. 7. Exhibits the method of connecting spigot and faucet pipes when they have a round turn. A and B, the junctures of the pipes.
Fig. 7. Shows how to connect spigot and faucet pipes when they have a bend. A and B, the joints of the pipes.
Fig. 8. Represents a longitudinal section of the mode of joining pipes by means of what is called a thimble joint. The junctures of the pipes to be connected, are made air tight, as mentioned already, by iron cement. A, the thimble or small cylinder, with projecting edges, which unites the pipes B, C.
Fig. 8. Represents a side view of how pipes are joined using what’s known as a thimble joint. The connections of the pipes to be linked are sealed off airtight, as mentioned earlier, with iron cement. A is the thimble or small cylinder with extended edges that connects the pipes B and C.
Fig. 9. A thimble joint made in two parts, which is sometimes convenient to join pipes. The parts are joined together by screw bolts, and nuts, in the usual manner.
Fig. 9. A thimble joint made in two parts, which is sometimes useful for connecting pipes. The parts are fastened together with screw bolts and nuts, just like usual.
Fig. 10. Section of the same.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Same section.
Fig. 11. Represents a profile view of what is called the saddle joint. It is employed for taking off a branch-pipe. The branch has a piece A B, formed on its end, and fits round one-half of the outside of the pipe from which it is to proceed. C, is called the saddle, which fits round the other half of the pipe. The parts are secured together[176] by screw bolts, and iron cement. By this method a branch may be formed on any part of a gas-pipe, by cutting a hole there, and applying the branch to that place. Where there is much risk of the inequality of expansion, the joints at certain places, should be secured by a soft stuffing of hemp and tallow; but in most cases the joints may be made with iron cement. Lead is frequently used for making the joints of gas pipes instead of iron cement, though cheaper and more easy of repair. The galvanic action which takes place between the lead and iron, soon renders the joints leaky, and the danger is increased by the unequal expansion of the two metals.
Fig. 11. Represents a profile view of what's called the saddle joint. It's used for attaching a branch pipe. The branch has a piece A B that fits around one-half of the outside of the pipe from which it extends. C is called the saddle, which fits around the other half of the pipe. The parts are held together[176] with screw bolts and iron cement. This method allows a branch to be formed on any part of a gas pipe by cutting a hole there and attaching the branch. Where there is a significant risk of uneven expansion, the joints in certain areas should be secured with a soft packing of hemp and tallow; however, in most cases, the joints can be made with iron cement. Lead is often used to make the joints of gas pipes instead of iron cement, even though it's cheaper and easier to repair. The galvanic reaction between the lead and iron can quickly cause leaks, and the risk is increased by the uneven expansion of the two metals.
Fig. 12. Section of the saddle-joint.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Part of the saddle joint.
Before the gas is suffered to enter into the pipe, they should be proved to be sound, by the usual process of forcing water into them: The pipes serving as mains, are placed perfectly solid, so that they cannot give way; their course should be rectilinear, having a descent of about 1 inch in 9 or 10 feet, to allow the water of condensation which may be deposited from the gas by a change of temperature to collect readily at the lowermost part.
Before allowing the gas to enter the pipe, they should be checked for soundness by the usual method of forcing water into them. The pipes that serve as mains should be securely positioned so that they won't give way. Their layout should be straight, with a slope of about 1 inch for every 9 or 10 feet to ensure that any condensation resulting from temperature changes collects easily at the lowest point.
Fig. 13. Shows a reservoir for collecting the water of condensation which might accumulate in the pipes. It consists of a receptacle, A, in which the water may pass; B, a branch-pipe closed at the top, by means of which the water may be removed, by drawing it out with a syringe. This receptacle is placed in those situations where pipes incline towards each other.
Fig. 13. Shows a container for collecting the condensation that might build up in the pipes. It consists of a receptacle, A, where the water can flow; B, a branch pipe sealed at the top, which allows the water to be extracted using a syringe. This container is positioned in areas where pipes slant toward each other.
PLATE VII.
Exhibits a perpendicular section of a gas-light apparatus, calculated for lighting towns, or large districts of streets and houses.
Exhibits a cross-section of a gas-light system designed for illuminating towns or large areas of streets and homes.
Fig. 1. The Retort Furnace. The retorts are placed over each other in one or more rows; so that a certain number of them may be heated by separate fire-places. A, A, shows two of the retorts placed horizontally above each other; B, the fire-place; C, the flue which causes the fire to circulate round the retorts so as to heat them equally in every part; D, the opening of the flue where the fire passes into the chimney; E, the ash-pit; F, a chamber in front of the retort furnace, into which the orifice or mouth of the retorts project; G, G, the doors of the chamber, to enable the workmen to charge and discharge the retorts; H, a funnel shaped hole at the floor of the chamber F, through which the red hot coke as it is discharged from the retorts passes into the arched vault I; K, the syphon tube; L, the horizontal condenser[41]—the action of both of these pipes have been already explained, p. 168; M, main pipe, which conveys the liquid substances from the condenser, to the tar cistern, fig. 3, and[178] which conducts also the gazeous products into the lime machine, fig. 2; N N, shows that part of the pipe which is interposed between the tar cistern, fig. 3, and the condensing pipe M,—it passes in a serpentine direction along the inner sides of the gasometer cistern, and, like the so-called worm in a distillatory apparatus, condenses the products which escape in a vaporous state from the condenser L; O, shows the place where the serpentine pipe N N, passes again out of the gasometer cistern, and its communication with the lime machine, fig. 2, and tar chamber, fig. 3. The action of the lime machine is as follows: The liquid products evolved from the coal, having been deposited in the tar cistern, fig. 3, by means of the serpentine pipe N, N, the gazeous products which accompany it, are conveyed by means of the pipe P, which branches out from the pipe O, into the interior receptacle of the lime machine marked Q, which consists of a vessel open at the bottom, and closed at the top, where it communicates with the pipe O. As the gas accumulates in the interior part Q, of the lime machine, it is made to pass through the liquid which it contains, namely, slaked lime and water; and escapes through appertures made in the horizontal partitions R, R, R, R, into the outer vessel, S, of the lime machine and from thence it is conducted away by the pipe T, T, T, into the additional washing apparatus, of the gasometer; fig. 4, the construction of this apparatus, greatly resembles the lime machine, fig. 2, namely, V, is a water pipe, proceeding from a cistern U, placed 3 or 4 feet above the orifice of the pipe V; T, T, is the gas-pipe,[179] covered with a hood, marked W, and immersed in a small cistern, having horizontal perforated shelves, like those in the lime machine—they fit close to the hood. The gas which enters the hood W, meets with a shower of water delivered by the pipe V. The gas, as it passes through the holes in the horizontal partitions, is, therefore, again washed and thoroughly purified from foreign gases which may have escaped the action of the lime machine; Y, is a waste pipe, the lower extremity of which is sealed by being immersed in water,—it serves to carry away the water delivered by the pipe V, as it has been acted on by the gas. The summary action of this gas apparatus is, therefore, as follows: The liquid products obtained from the coal during the distillation are first deposited in the main condenser L, by means of the pipe K, and from whence they cannot escape until a quantity of tar has accumulated in it to a certain height, and by this means, one of the extremities of the pipes K, K, becomes immersed and hermetically sealed by the liquid which the condenser L, contains. The liquid products, after having accumulated to a certain height in the condenser, overflow the perpendicular portion which it contains, and discharge themselves into the pipe M, from whence they are transported into the tar cistern, fig. 3, by means of the system of pipes N, N, O, whilst the gazeous products are made to pass by means of the branch pipe P, into the lime machine, fig. 2. From this part of the apparatus the gas passes through the pipe T, T, T, into the additional or smaller washing apparatus placed upon a tressel in the cistern of the[180] gasometer, where it is again exposed a second time to the action of a current of fresh water; and from this vessel the gas ascends into the gasometer. The gasometer is furnished with a pipe A, closed at the top, and fixed in one corner of the gasometer, but open at the bottom; it includes another pipe marked B, which communicates with the main pipe leading to the burners, or place where the gas is wanted. The pipe A, which slides over the pipe B, is perforated at the top, the gas passes through these perforations and is thus made to enter into the pipe B, and disposed of as mentioned. C, C, is a tube of safety adapted to the gasometer; its lower extremity remains sealed by the water in the cistern so long as the gasometer is not overcharged with gas; but, if more gas should be made to enter the gasometer than it is destined to receive, this pipe then delivers the gas into the funnel-shaped tube D, which reaches through the roof of the gasometer house, and thus the superfluous quantity of gas is conveyed away into the open air.
Fig. 1. The Retort Furnace. The retorts are stacked one above the other in one or more rows, allowing several to be heated by separate fireplaces. A, A, shows two retorts positioned horizontally on top of each other; B, the fireplace; C, the flue that circulates fire around the retorts to heat them evenly in every part; D, the opening of the flue where the fire passes into the chimney; E, the ash pit; F, a chamber in front of the retort furnace, where the mouth of the retorts projects; G, G, the doors of the chamber, allowing workers to load and unload the retorts; H, a funnel-shaped hole at the floor of chamber F, through which the red-hot coke discharged from the retorts falls into the arched vault I; K, the siphon tube; L, the horizontal condenser—the function of both pipes has been explained already, p. 168; M, main pipe, which carries the liquid substances from the condenser to the tar cistern, fig. 3, and[178] which also directs the gaseous products into the lime machine, fig. 2; N N, shows that part of the pipe that is between the tar cistern, fig. 3, and the condensing pipe M—it goes in a serpentine direction along the inner sides of the gasometer cistern, and, like the so-called worm in a distillation setup, condenses the products that emerge in vapor form from the condenser L; O, shows where the serpentine pipe N N exits the gasometer cistern and connects with the lime machine, fig. 2, and tar chamber, fig. 3. The action of the lime machine works as follows: The liquid products produced from the coal are initially stored in the tar cistern, fig. 3, and through the serpentine pipe N N, the gaseous products are transported via pipe P, which branches from the pipe O, into the interior compartment of the lime machine marked Q, which consists of a vessel open at the bottom and closed at the top, where it connects with pipe O. As gas builds up in the inner part Q of the lime machine, it passes through the liquid inside, which consists of slaked lime and water, and escapes through openings in the horizontal partitions R, R, R, R, into the outer vessel S of the lime machine, from where it is led away by the pipe T, T, T, into the additional washing apparatus of the gasometer; fig. 4, the design of this apparatus closely resembles the lime machine, fig. 2, namely, V, is a water pipe originating from a cistern U, located 3 or 4 feet above the entrance of pipe V; T, T, is the gas pipe,[179] covered with a hood, marked W, and submerged in a small cistern with perforated horizontal shelves, similar to those in the lime machine—they fit closely against the hood. The gas that enters the hood W encounters a spray of water from pipe V. As the gas moves through the holes in the horizontal partitions, it is washed again and thoroughly cleansed of any foreign gases that might have escaped the lime machine's process; Y, is a waste pipe, the lower end of which is sealed by immersion in water—it serves to carry away the water released by the pipe V, as it has been treated by the gas. The overall function of this gas apparatus is as follows: The liquid products obtained from the coal during distillation are first deposited in the main condenser L via the pipe K, and cannot escape until a certain amount of tar has built up, sealing one end of pipe K, K with the liquid in the condenser L. Once the liquid products rise to a specific level in the condenser, they overflow into the vertical section of the pipe M, from where they are moved into the tar cistern, fig. 3, through pipes N, N, O, while the gaseous products are directed via the branch pipe P into the lime machine, fig. 2. From this part of the apparatus, the gas flows through the pipe T, T, T, into the additional or smaller washing apparatus set up on a trestle in the gasometer cistern, where it is once more exposed to fresh water; from this vessel, the gas rises into the gasometer. The gasometer is equipped with a pipe A, closed at the top and fixed in one corner of the gasometer, but open at the bottom; it includes another pipe marked B, which connects to the main pipe leading to the burners, or wherever the gas is needed. The pipe A, which slides over pipe B, has openings at the top, allowing the gas to flow through these openings into pipe B, where it is then utilized as described. C, C, is a safety tube attached to the gasometer; its lower end remains sealed by the water in the cistern as long as the gasometer isn't overfilled with gas; however, if more gas is forced into the gasometer than it can hold, this pipe will release the excess gas into the funnel-shaped tube D, which extends through the roof of the gasometer house, thus directing the surplus gas into the open air.
[41] The condenser in this apparatus is placed at right angles to the row, or rows of retorts. It is furnished at one extremity with a partition placed perpendicularly, and of a height equal to about one-half of the diameter of the condenser. The object of this partition is to prevent the tar, &c. deposited in it, to seal the pipes K, K, and not to discharge itself into the pipe M, till this has been effected. The partition is seen in the drawing.
[41] The condenser in this setup is positioned at a right angle to the row or rows of retorts. At one end, it has a vertical partition that is about half the diameter of the condenser in height. This partition's purpose is to keep the tar and similar substances contained, sealing the pipes K, K, and preventing them from flowing into pipe M until this containment is complete. The drawing shows the partition.
The cylindrical vessel P, of fig. 3, surrounding the orifice of the pipe O, which delivers the tar into the tar cistern, fig. 3, serves to keep this pipe constantly immersed into a portion of tar, so that the contents of the cistern may be drawn off by the cock without admitting air into any part of the apparatus. The tar cistern has a small hole at the top, to allow the air which it encloses to escape, as it becomes filled with tar and ammoniacal liquor. The main condenser L, is placed, as shown in the drawing, higher than the level of the water in the gasometer cistern,[181] to allow a free descent of the distillatory liquids as they pass from this vessel along into the pipes M, N, O, &c. The cistern of the gasometer, as well as the lime machine, and tar cistern, are constructed of cast iron plates, bolted and cemented together with iron cement. The gasometer is made of sheet iron plates rivetted together—E, E, are two iron stays—G, G, are friction wheels.
The cylindrical container P, of fig. 3, surrounding the opening of the pipe O, which delivers the tar into the tar cistern, fig. 3, is designed to keep this pipe constantly submerged in a portion of tar, so that the contents of the cistern can be drawn off using the valve without allowing air to enter any part of the system. The tar cistern has a small hole at the top to let the air inside escape as it fills with tar and ammonia solution. The main condenser L is positioned, as shown in the drawing, higher than the water level in the gasometer cistern,[181] to facilitate the free flow of distillatory liquids as they move from this vessel into the pipes M, N, O, etc. The gasometer cistern, along with the lime machine and tar cistern, are made from cast iron plates that are bolted and sealed together with iron cement. The gasometer is constructed from sheet iron plates that are riveted together—E, E are two iron supports—G, G are friction wheels.
METHOD of correcting the relative pressure of the Gasometer, so as to cause the gas which it contains to be uniformly of an equal density.[42]
We have mentioned already that the pressure of the gas in the gasometer should be invariable, for it is obvious that the weight of the gasometer is constantly increasing in proportion as it fills with gas, and rises out of the water—see p. 88, and 167. To render its pressure uniform, we first take the absolute weight of that part of the gasometer which becomes immersed in the water, and knowing the specific weight of the substance of which it is composed, we divide its absolute weight by the specific weight of the substance of which it is composed; and this being done, we make part of the chain, (measured at right angles from the axis of the wheels over which it passes downwards towards the top of the gasometer,) which is equal to the length of that part of the gasometer which becomes immersed in water, equal in weight to the specific gravity of the substance[182] of which the gasometer is composed. For example, let us suppose that the part of the gasometer which becomes immersed in water weighs 861 lb. and that it is composed of sheet iron, the specific gravity of which, in round numbers, we will take to be 7. It is then evident, that the part of the chain of the gasometer measured downward from the axis of the wheel over which it passes, and which is equal in length to the height of the gasometer, must be loaded with a weight of, or must itself weigh, 123lb. for this would be the weight of the water displaced by the gasometer; or let us suppose the gasometer to be made of sheet copper, the specific weight of which (omitting decimals) is 8; and that the absolute weight of the gasometer is 1792lbs. then the chain of the gasometer equal in length to the height of the gasometer, immersed into the water must weigh 224lb. for this would be the weight of the quantity of water which the gasometer displaces. This being accomplished by then adding or diminishing the absolute or balance weight of the gasometer, any desired uniform pressure may be effected, and the same bulk of gas will always be of the same specific gravity.
We've already mentioned that the pressure of the gas in the gasometer should remain constant, since it's clear that the weight of the gasometer keeps increasing as it fills with gas and rises out of the water—see p. 88, and 167. To keep its pressure uniform, we first determine the absolute weight of the part of the gasometer submerged in the water, and knowing the specific weight of the material it’s made of, we divide its absolute weight by the specific weight of that material. Once that's done, we create a part of the chain (measured perpendicular to the axis of the wheels as it goes down towards the top of the gasometer) that's equal in length to the submerged portion of the gasometer, matching the weight of the specific gravity of the material the gasometer is made from[182]. For instance, let’s say the submerged part of the gasometer weighs 861 lb. and it’s made of sheet iron, which we’ll take to have a specific gravity of about 7. It follows that the part of the gasometer chain measured down from the wheel's axis, equal in length to the height of the gasometer, must bear a weight of or weigh itself 123lb., as this would be the weight of the water displaced by the gasometer. Alternatively, if we assume the gasometer is made of sheet copper, the specific weight of which (excluding decimals) is 8, and the absolute weight of the gasometer is 1792lbs., then the section of the gasometer chain equal in length to its height and submerged in water must weigh 224lb., as this would represent the weight of the water the gasometer displaces. By adjusting the absolute or balance weight of the gasometer accordingly, we can achieve any desired uniform pressure, ensuring that the same volume of gas always maintains the same specific gravity.
DIRECTIONS TO WORKMEN
Joining
THE GAS-LIGHT APPARATUS[43].
Particular care must be taken to make the joints of the mouth-pieces of the retorts perfectly air tight, which may be done in the following manner:—Take[183] some common clay, dry, pulverize, and sift it, then add as much water as will make it into the consistency of treacle; make the mouth-piece and the lid of the retort clean, lay this luting thinly over the turned part of the lid, press the lid so luted gently to the mouth-piece, and then secure it moderately, by means of the iron wedge: if the workman observes this rule, he will never fail to make good joints; but if, on the other hand, the operator is careless and neglects to remove the old luting, &c. from the turned or smooth part of the mouth of the retort, and thereby cause a bad joint, the consequence will be the loss of a considerable quantity of gas, and a very disagreeable smell and smoke.
Particular care must be taken to ensure the joints of the mouthpieces of the retorts are completely airtight, which can be done in the following way: Take[183] some common clay, dry it, crush it into a powder, and sift it. Then add enough water to achieve a consistency similar to treacle. Clean the mouthpiece and lid of the retort, apply this mixture thinly over the rim of the lid, press the lid gently onto the mouthpiece, and then secure it moderately with the iron wedge. If the worker follows this guideline, they'll consistently create good joints. However, if the operator is careless and fails to remove the old luting, etc., from the smooth part of the mouth of the retort, resulting in a poor joint, it will lead to a significant loss of gas, as well as an unpleasant smell and smoke.
The bridge or row of bricks of the flue C, of the retorts, should never be made hotter than a bright red, which may be regulated by the door of the ash-pit being kept close shut when the fire is getting too hot. If the operator neglects this, and suffers the fire-bricks to arrive at a bright white heat the retorts will soon be destroyed, and bad gas be produced.
The bridge or row of bricks of the flue C, of the retorts, should never be heated beyond a bright red. This can be regulated by keeping the ash-pit door tightly closed when the fire is getting too hot. If the operator ignores this and allows the fire-bricks to reach a bright white heat, the retorts will quickly be ruined, and poor-quality gas will be produced.
The gasometer should be well examined, at least once a week, to see if it leaks, by the following method, viz. Let the main stop-cock be shut, then make a mark on the gasometer at the water’s edge when it is full or nearly of gas, there being no gas coming from the retorts at the time, and if the mark sinks in the water, the gasometer leaks; to find out the place, walk slowly round it, and you may perceive the leak by the smell, apply a lighted candle to the part suspected, and if there be gas issuing from[184] it, it will take fire, and perhaps appear like a small blue flame—blow it out, and mark the place: thus proceed round the gasometer till you have found all the places; if you perceive a smell, and yet cannot produce a flame in the part suspected, take a brush with a little thin white-lead paint, and lay it on the part where you think the leak is, and, if it be there, the gas which escapes from the leak, will immediately turn the paint brown. After the sides of the gasometer have been well examined, and secured by dipping a piece of cloth about the size of a shilling, into some melted pitch, tempered with a little bees-wax and tar, apply the cloth whilst hot to the place with the end of your finger, rubbing it till it is quite cold; next examine the top of the gasometer in the same manner,—when it is about two feet high in the cistern, it will then be better to get at. The water in the cistern should always be kept within 3 or four inches of the top, if suffered to sink much lower without replenishing, the gas will not pass through a sufficient quantity of water, and oily particles will be apt to condense in the pipes, to their great detriment.
The gasometer should be inspected at least once a week for leaks using the following method. First, shut the main stop-cock, then mark the gasometer at the water’s edge when it’s full or nearly full of gas, ensuring no gas is coming from the retorts at the time. If the mark sinks in the water, it indicates a leak. To locate the leak, walk slowly around it; you may detect the leak by smell. Light a candle near the suspected area, and if gas is escaping, it will ignite, possibly showing as a small blue flame. Extinguish it and mark the spot. Continue moving around the gasometer until all leaks are identified. If you smell gas but cannot ignite it in the suspected area, use a brush with a bit of thin white-lead paint and apply it where you think the leak is. If there is a leak, the escaping gas will turn the paint brown. After thoroughly examining the sides of the gasometer, seal any identified leaks by dipping a piece of cloth about the size of a shilling into melted pitch mixed with a little beeswax and tar. While the cloth is still hot, press it onto the leak with your finger and rub it until it cools completely. Next, inspect the top of the gasometer in the same way; it’s easier to reach when the water level in the cistern is about two feet high. The water in the cistern should always be kept within three or four inches of the top. If it drops too low without being replenished, gas won’t filter through enough water, and oily particles may condense in the pipes, causing significant damage.
The only thing to be observed in the place lighted is, that the lamps and pipes are not suffered to be touched on any pretence whatever, but by the person entrusted with their care. When a lamp is not wanted, it must be completely shut off from the pipe which supplies it, by a stop-cock provided for the purpose, and not opened again but when a flame is held over it; not a lighted candle, as the tallow is liable to drop into the lamps; lighted paper is better.
The only thing to note in the lit area is that the lamps and pipes should not be touched for any reason, except by the person responsible for them. When a lamp isn't needed, it must be completely turned off from the supply pipe using a stop-cock made for that purpose, and it should only be opened again when a flame is held above it; a lit candle shouldn't be used, as the wax may drip into the lamps; using lit paper is a better option.
ESTIMATE
OF
THE PRICE
OF
A GAS-LIGHT APPARATUS,
IF BUILT IN LONDON,
Capable of affording, every 24 hours, Light equal to 40,000 Tallow Candles, six in the pound, burning one hour.
Capable of providing, every 24 hours, light equivalent to 40,000 tallow candles, six per pound, burning for one hour.
£. | s. | |
---|---|---|
Gasometer, to contain 10,000 cubic feet of gas | 236 | 0 |
Wheel-work, regulating chain, ballance-weight for ditto, with wooden framing | 160 | 11 |
Wrought iron cistern for gasometer—36 feet wide, 24 feet long and 16 feet deep | 500 | 0 |
(It would weigh about 16 tons.) | ||
Wooden framing built around it, to secure ditto | 150 | 0 |
Condenser, cistern and communicating pipes | 126 | 0 |
Lime machine, made of cast iron plates | 82 | 0 |
Gasometer-house, built of frame-work and weather-boarded | 250 | 0 |
Twenty-four retorts set in brick-work, with furnaces for ditto, compleat | 336 | 0 |
Sundries | 100 | 0 |
£ 1940 | 11 |
A gas-light apparatus complete for work, capable of affording every twenty-four hours a quantity of light equal to 1,400 Argand’s Lamps, each lamp equal in intensity to six candles, six in the pound, burning for five hours, will cost 3,500l. if erected in this metropolis.
A complete gas-light system ready for use, able to provide a total amount of light every twenty-four hours equivalent to 1,400 Argand Lamps, with each lamp having an intensity equal to six candles, six to the pound, burning for five hours, will cost £3,500 if set up in this city.
LONDON Price List of the most essential articles[44] employed in the erection of a Gas-Light apparatus.
[44] All the articles are warranted to be perfect and of the best kind. They are delivered free of expence at any wharf between London and Westminster-bridge.
[44] All the items are guaranteed to be flawless and of the highest quality. They are delivered free of charge to any dock between London and Westminster Bridge.
Sheet-iron pipes brazed. | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
s. | d. | ||||||||
1⁄4 | inch in diameter | 0 | 4 | a foot | - | in 15 to 18 feet lengths. |
|||
3⁄8 | ditto | 0 | 4 | ditto | |||||
1⁄2 | ditto | 0 | 5 | ditto | |||||
5⁄8 | ditto | 0 | 6 | ditto | |||||
3⁄4 | ditto | 0 | 6 | 1⁄2 | ditto | ||||
7⁄8 | ditto | 7 | ditto | ||||||
1 | inch, ditto | 0 | 7 | 1⁄2 | ditto | ||||
1 | 1⁄4 | ditto | 0 | 9 | ditto | ||||
1 | 1⁄2 | ditto | 0 | 10 | 1⁄2 | ditto | |||
1 | 3⁄4 | ditto | 0 | 11 | ditto | ||||
2 | inch, ditto | 1 | 1 | 1⁄2 | ditto | ||||
2 | 1⁄4 | ditto | 1 | 4 | ditto | ||||
2 | 1⁄2 | ditto | 1 | 5 | ditto | ||||
3 | inch, ditto | 1 | 6 | 1⁄2 | ditto | ||||
Copper pipes brazed 1⁄4 inch | 0 | 4 | per foot | ||||||
Ditto, ditto, ditto 3⁄8 inch | 0 | 5 | 1⁄2 | ditto | |||||
Gas-light cockspur burners with stop-cock 2s 6d to 3s 6d | |||||||||
Argand’s lamps, with glass-holders, from 3s to 4s 6d |
Cast-iron retorts, weighing 7 cwt. at 15s 6d per cwt | £5 | 8 | 6 |
Mouth-piece for ditto, compleat | 1 | 14 | 8 |
Cast-iron door frames for retort furnace | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Furnace bars 10s. per cwt. | |||
Sheet iron for gazometer (No. 23) 24s. per cwt. | |||
Gazometer chains, 5d per lb. | |||
Ballance weights [Plates] for gazometer, 9l 10s per ton. | |||
Cast-iron cistern plates | |||
----------------------- smaller size for lime machine, 18l per ton. | |||
----------------------- middling size for tar cistern, 16l ditto | |||
----------------------- largest size for gazometer cistern 14l ditto |
Cast-iron flanch pipes | 2 | - | inch diameter, at | 5s | per yd. in | 6 | feet lengths | ||
ditto | 3 | ditto | 6s | ditto | 6 | ditto | |||
ditto | 4 | ditto | 8s | 6d | ditto | 9 | ditto | ||
ditto | 5 | ditto | 10s | ditto | 9 | ditto | |||
ditto | 6 | ditto | 12s | ditto | 9 | ditto | |||
ditto | 7 | ditto | 13s | 6d | ditto | 9 | ditto | ||
ditto | 8 | - | 11l. 5s. per ton | 9 | ditto | ||||
ditto | 9 | ||||||||
ditto | 10 | ||||||||
ditto | 11 |
1⁄2 inch nuts, screws and washers to put iron pipes together | 7d. | per lb |
5⁄8 ditto | 7d. | ditto |
3⁄4 ditto | 6d. | ditto |
English bar-iron | 13l. | per ton |
Best, ditto | 18l. | ditto |
FINIS.
THE END.
Transcriber’s notes
The entries in the Table of Contents do not always conform to the chapter and section headings in the text. Both have been retained as in the original work.
The errata have already been incorporated in the text; the error mentioned as occurring on page 24 actually occurs on page 22.
The original language, including inconsistencies in spelling, hyphenation, punctuation, formatting, etc. has been retained, except as mentioned below.
The e-reader cover image has been created for this project, and is placed in the public domain.
Unclear parts of the text have been checked against the on-line copy of this book of the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich.
Fractions like 1⁄2 and 1-10th have both been retained.
Page 90, Van Dieman, Troostwyck: Jan Rudolph Deiman and Adriaan Paets van Troostwijk.
The entries in the Table of Contents don't always match the chapter and section headings in the text. Both have been kept as in the original work.
The errors have already been fixed in the text; the mistake noted as being on page 24 actually appears on page 22.
The original language, including inconsistencies in spelling, hyphenation, punctuation, formatting, etc., has been preserved, except as noted below.
The e-reader cover image has been created for this project and is placed in the public domain.
Unclear parts of the text have been verified against the online copy of this book from the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich.
Fractions like 1⁄2 and 1-10th have both been kept.
Page 90, Van Dieman, Troostwyck: Jan Rudolph Deiman and Adriaan Paets van Troostwijk.
Changes made to the text:
Obvious punctuation and typographical errors have been corrected silently.
Some footnotes, tables and illustrations have been moved; some tables have been re-arranged.
Changes made to the text:
Obvious punctuation and typographical errors have been corrected quietly.
Some footnotes, tables, and illustrations have been relocated; some tables have been rearranged.
Other changes:
Page 23: any surfaces changed to any surface
Page 26: opening or shuting changed to opening or shutting
Page 47: A New changed to A new
Page 48: trafic changed to traffic; footnote [10]: corporated changed to incorporated (cf. errata)
Page 53: This combustion changed to The combustion (cf. errata)
Page 64: Cleg changed to Clegg (cf. errata); footnote anchor [14] moved from next page (cf. errata, footnote anchor *); communicates changed to communicated (cf. errata)
Page 67: 1250 + 2 = 2500 changed to 1250 × 2 = 2500
Page 69: Mr. Lee changed to “Mr. Lee for consistency
Page 72: closing quote mark added to letter
Page 96: pure coal- changed to pure coal-gas
Page 102: sub acetate changed to sub-acetate
Page 118: ball 6 changed to ball b
Page 119: e, are changed to e e, are
Page 125: 180 degree changed to 180 degrees (cf. errata); footnote [28]: may he compleatly changed to may be compleatly
Page 131: and make changed to and makes
Page 132: coal changed to coal-tar (cf. errata)
Page 158: Nortou Falgate changed to Norton Falgate; a about changed to about
Page 165, table: 10,509 changed to 10,500.
Other changes:
Page 23: any surfaces changed to any surface
Page 26: opening or shuting changed to opening or shutting
Page 47: A New changed to A new
Page 48: trafic changed to traffic; footnote [10]: corporated changed to incorporated (cf. errata)
Page 53: This combustion changed to The combustion (cf. errata)
Page 64: Cleg changed to Clegg (cf. errata); footnote anchor [14] moved from next page (cf. errata, footnote anchor *); communicates changed to communicated (cf. errata)
Page 67: 1250 + 2 = 2500 changed to 1250 × 2 = 2500
Page 69: Mr. Lee changed to “Mr. Lee for consistency
Page 72: closing quote mark added to letter
Page 96: pure coal- changed to pure coal-gas
Page 102: sub acetate changed to sub-acetate
Page 118: ball 6 changed to ball b
Page 119: e, are changed to e e, are
Page 125: 180 degree changed to 180 degrees (cf. errata); footnote [28]: may he compleatly changed to may be compleatly
Page 131: and make changed to and makes
Page 132: coal changed to coal-tar (cf. errata)
Page 158: Nortou Falgate changed to Norton Falgate; a about changed to about
Page 165, table: 10,509 changed to 10,500.
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!