This is a modern-English version of The Life of the Bee, originally written by Maeterlinck, Maurice. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.









THE LIFE OF THE BEE

By Maurice Maeterlinck



Translated By Alfred Sutro

NEW YORK

1914

Published May, 1901










CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS












I — ON THE THRESHOLD OF THE HIVE

{1}

IT is not my intention to write a treatise on apiculture, or on practical bee-keeping. Excellent works of the kind abound in all civilised countries, and it were useless to attempt another. France has those of Dadant, Georges de Layens and Bonnier, Bertrand, Hamet, Weber, Clement, the Abbe Collin, etc. English-speaking countries have Langstroth, Bevan, Cook, Cheshire, Cowan, Root, etc. Germany has Dzierzon, Van Berlespoch, Pollmann, Vogel, and many others.

IT is not my aim to write a detailed study on beekeeping or practical hive management. There are already great resources available in all developed countries, so there's no point in trying to create another one. France has works by Dadant, Georges de Layens, Bonnier, Bertrand, Hamet, Weber, Clement, the Abbe Collin, and others. English-speaking countries have Langstroth, Bevan, Cook, Cheshire, Cowan, Root, and more. Germany features Dzierzon, Van Berlespoch, Pollmann, Vogel, and many others.

Nor is this book to be a scientific monograph on Apis Mellifica, Ligustica, Fasciata, Dorsata, etc., or a collection of new observations and studies. I shall say scarcely anything that those will not know who are somewhat familiar with bees. The notes and experiments I have made during my twenty years of beekeeping I shall reserve for a more technical work; for their interest is necessarily of a special and limited nature, and I am anxious not to over-burden this essay. I wish to speak of the bees very simply, as one speaks of a subject one knows and loves to those who know it not. I do not intend to adorn the truth, or merit the just reproach Reaumur addressed to his predecessors in the study of our honey-flies, whom he accused of substituting for the marvellous reality marvels that were imaginary and merely plausible. The fact that the hive contains so much that is wonderful does not warrant our seeking to add to its wonders. Besides, I myself have now for a long time ceased to look for anything more beautiful in this world, or more interesting, than the truth; or at least than the effort one is able to make towards the truth. I shall state nothing, therefore, that I have not verified myself, or that is not so fully accepted in the text-books as to render further verification superfluous. My facts shall be as accurate as though they appeared in a practical manual or scientific monograph, but I shall relate them in a somewhat livelier fashion than such works would allow, shall group them more harmoniously together, and blend them with freer and more mature reflections. The reader of this book will not learn therefrom how to manage a hive; but he will know more or less all that can with any certainty be known of the curious, profound, and intimate side of its inhabitants. Nor will this be at the cost of what still remains to be learned. I shall pass over in silence the hoary traditions that, in the country and many a book, still constitute the legend of the hive. Whenever there be doubt, disagreement, hypothesis, when I arrive at the unknown, I shall declare it loyally; you will find that we often shall halt before the unknown. Beyond the appreciable facts of their life we know but little of the bees. And the closer our acquaintance becomes, the nearer is our ignorance brought to us of the depths of their real existence; but such ignorance is better than the other kind, which is unconscious, and satisfied.

Nor is this book meant to be a scientific study on Apis Mellifica, Ligustica, Fasciata, Dorsata, etc., or a collection of new observations and research. I won't say much that those who are somewhat familiar with bees won't already know. The notes and experiments I've gathered over my twenty years of beekeeping are reserved for a more technical work; their interest is naturally specialized and limited, and I don’t want to overload this essay. I want to talk about bees simply, as one discusses a subject they know and love with those who might not know it. I don’t intend to embellish the truth, or earn the rightful reproach that Reaumur directed at his predecessors in studying our honeybees, who he accused of substituting fanciful wonders for marvelous reality. The fact that the hive holds so many wonders doesn’t give us reason to add to them. Besides, I've long stopped looking for anything more beautiful or interesting in this world than the truth, or at least the effort one can put into seeking the truth. So, I will only present what I have verified myself, or what is so widely accepted in textbooks that further verification is unnecessary. My facts will be as accurate as if they appeared in a practical guide or scientific study, but I will share them in a more engaging way than such works would allow, organizing them more harmoniously and blending them with more free and mature reflections. The reader of this book won’t learn how to manage a hive, but they will gain insights into the curious, profound, and intimate aspects of its inhabitants. This won’t come at the expense of what is still unknown. I will skip over the old traditions that still make up the legend of the hive in rural areas and many books. Whenever there is doubt, disagreement, or hypothesis, and when I reach the unknown, I will state it honestly; you will see that we often pause before the unknown. Beyond the observable facts of their lives, we know very little about bees. The closer we get to them, the more aware we become of our ignorance regarding the depths of their true existence; but that kind of ignorance is better than the unconscious, complacent kind.

Does an analogous work on the bee exist? I believe I have read almost all that has been written on bees; but of kindred matter I know only Michelet's chapter at the end of his book "The Insect," and Ludwig Buchner's essay in his "Mind in Animals." Michelet merely hovers on the fringe of his subject; Buchner's treatise is comprehensive enough, but contains so many hazardous statements, so much long-discarded gossip and hearsay, that I suspect him of never having left his library, never having set forth himself to question his heroines, or opened one of the many hundreds of rustling, wing-lit hives which we must profane before our instinct can be attuned to their secret, before we can perceive the spirit and atmosphere, perfume and mystery, of these virgin daughters of toil. The book smells not of the bee, or its honey; and has the defects of many a learned work, whose conclusions often are preconceived, and whose scientific attainment is composed of a vast array of doubtful anecdotes collected on every side. But in this essay of mine we rarely shall meet each other; for our starting-point, our aim, and our point of view are all very different.

Does a similar work on bees exist? I think I’ve read almost everything written about them, but in terms of related topics, I only know Michelet's chapter at the end of his book "The Insect," and Ludwig Buchner's essay in "Mind in Animals." Michelet only touches on the edges of his topic; Buchner's piece is detailed enough, but includes so many questionable claims, a lot of outdated gossip, and hearsay that I suspect he has never actually left his library, never ventured out to observe the bees himself, or opened any of the countless buzzing, winged hives that we must disturb before our instincts can align with their secrets, before we can sense the essence, atmosphere, scent, and mystery of these untouched workers. The book doesn’t smell of bees or their honey; it reflects the flaws of many academic works, whose conclusions are often biased and whose scientific insights are built on a collection of dubious anecdotes gathered from various sources. However, in this essay of mine, we are unlikely to align; our starting points, goals, and perspectives are all very different.

{2}

{2}

The bibliography of the bee (we will begin with the books so as to get rid of them as soon as we can and go to the source of the books) is very extensive. From the beginning this strange little creature, that lived in a society under complicated laws and executed prodigious labours in the darkness, attracted the notice of men. Aristotle, Cato, Varro, Pliny, Columella, Palladius all studied the bees; to say nothing of Aristomachus, who, according to Cicero, watched them for fifty-eight years, and of Phyliscus, whose writings are lost. But these dealt rather with the legend of the bee; and all that we can gather therefrom—which indeed is exceedingly little—we may find condensed in the fourth book of Virgil's Georgics.

The bibliography of the bee (we'll start with the books to get through them quickly and move on to the primary sources) is quite extensive. From the outset, this fascinating little creature, which lives in a society governed by complex rules and undertakes incredible tasks in the dark, has caught the attention of people. Aristotle, Cato, Varro, Pliny, Columella, and Palladius all studied bees; not to mention Aristomachus, who, according to Cicero, observed them for fifty-eight years, and Phyliscus, whose works have been lost. However, these authors focused more on the myths surrounding bees; and all that we can glean from them—which is actually very little—we can find summarized in the fourth book of Virgil's Georgics.

The real history of the bee begins in the seventeenth century, with the discoveries of the great Dutch savant Swammerdam. It is well, however, to add this detail, but little known: before Swammerdam a Flemish naturalist named Clutius had arrived at certain important truths, such as the sole maternity of the queen and her possession of the attributes of both sexes, but he had left these unproved. Swammerdam founded the true methods of scientific investigation; he invented the microscope, contrived injections to ward off decay, was the first to dissect the bees, and by the discovery of the ovaries and the oviduct definitely fixed the sex of the queen, hitherto looked upon as a king, and threw the whole political scheme of the hive into most unexpected light by basing it upon maternity. Finally he produced woodcuts and engravings so perfect that to this day they serve to illustrate many books on apiculture. He lived in the turbulent, restless Amsterdam of those days, regretting "Het Zoete Buiten Leve "—The Sweet Life of the Country—and died, worn-out with work, at the age of forty-three. He wrote in a pious, formal style, with beautiful, simple outbursts of a faith that, fearful of falling away, ascribed all things to the glory of the Creator; and embodied his observations and studies in his great work "Bybel der Natuure," which the doctor Boerhave, a century later, caused to be translated from the Dutch into Latin under the title of "Biblia Naturae." (Leyden, 1737.)

The real history of the bee begins in the seventeenth century with the discoveries of the great Dutch scientist Swammerdam. However, it’s worth noting a lesser-known detail: before Swammerdam, a Flemish naturalist named Clutius had uncovered some important truths, such as the queen's sole responsibility for reproduction and her characteristics of both sexes, but he hadn’t provided proof for these findings. Swammerdam established the true methods of scientific research; he invented the microscope, developed injections to prevent decay, was the first to dissect bees, and by discovering the ovaries and oviduct, he confirmed the queen's sex, which had previously been thought to be male, shedding new light on the entire political structure of the hive by basing it on motherhood. Ultimately, he created woodcuts and engravings so precise that they still illustrate many books on beekeeping today. He lived in the bustling, dynamic Amsterdam of his time, longing for "Het Zoete Buiten Leve"—The Sweet Life of the Country—and passed away, exhausted from his work, at the age of forty-three. He wrote in a devout, formal style, with beautiful, simple expressions of faith that attributed everything to the glory of the Creator; he compiled his observations and studies in his significant work "Bybel der Natuure," which a century later, Dr. Boerhave had translated from Dutch to Latin under the title "Biblia Naturae." (Leyden, 1737.)

Then came Reaumur, who, pursuing similar methods, made a vast number of curious experiments and researches in his gardens at Charenton, and devoted to the bees an entire volume of his "Notes to Serve for a History of Insects." One may read it with profit to-day, and without fatigue. It is clear, direct, and sincere, and possessed of a certain hard, arid charm of its own. He sought especially the destruction of ancient errors; he himself was responsible for several new ones; he partially understood the formation of swarms and the political establishment of queens; in a word, he discovered many difficult truths, and paved the way for the discovery of more. He fully appreciated the marvellous architecture of the hive; and what he said on the subject has never been better said. It is to him, too, that we owe the idea of the glass hives, which, having since been perfected, enable us to follow the entire private life of these fierce insects, whose work, begun in the dazzling sunshine, receives its crown in the darkness. To be comprehensive, one should mention also the somewhat subsequent works and investigations of Charles Bonnet and Schirach (who solved the enigma of the royal egg); but I will keep to the broad lines, and pass at once to Francois Huber, the master and classic of contemporary apiarian science.

Then came Reaumur, who, using similar methods, conducted a wide range of interesting experiments and research in his gardens at Charenton, devoting an entire volume of his "Notes to Serve for a History of Insects" to bees. You can read it profitably today without getting tired. It’s clear, straightforward, and genuine, with a certain unique, stark charm. He aimed mainly to eliminate old misconceptions; he was also responsible for some new ones; he had a partial understanding of how swarms form and how queens are established; in short, he uncovered several complex truths and laid the groundwork for future discoveries. He truly appreciated the incredible architecture of the hive, and what he wrote about it has never been better articulated. We also owe him the concept of glass hives, which, now improved, allow us to observe the complete private lives of these aggressive insects, whose work, which begins in brilliant sunlight, culminates in darkness. To be thorough, it’s also worth mentioning the later works and studies of Charles Bonnet and Schirach (who solved the mystery of the royal egg); however, I will stick to the main points and move directly to François Huber, the master and classic of contemporary beekeeping science.

Huber was born in Geneva in 1750, and fell blind in his earliest youth. The experiments of Reaumur interested him; he sought to verify them, and soon becoming passionately absorbed in these researches, eventually, with the assistance of an intelligent and faithful servant, Francois Burnens, devoted his entire life to the study of the bee. In the annals of human suffering and human triumph there is nothing more touching, no lesson more admirable, than the story of this patient collaboration, wherein the one who saw only with immaterial light guided with his spirit the eyes and hands of the other who had the real earthly vision; where he who, as we are assured, had never with his own eyes beheld a comb of honey, was yet able, notwithstanding the veil on his dead eyes that rendered double the veil in which nature enwraps all things, to penetrate the profound secrets of the genius that had made this invisible comb; as though to teach us that no condition in life can warrant our abandoning our desire and search for the truth. I will not enumerate all that apiarian science owes to Huber; to state what it does not owe were the briefer task. His "New Observations on Bees," of which the first volume was written in 1789, in the form of letters to Charles Bonnet, the second not appearing till twenty years later, have remained the unfailing, abundant treasure into which every subsequent writer has dipped. And though a few mistakes may be found therein, a few incomplete truths; though since his time considerable additions have been made to the micrography and practical culture of bees, the handling of queens, etc., there is not a single one of his principal statements that has been disproved, or discovered in error; and in our actual experience they stand untouched, and indeed at its very foundation.

Huber was born in Geneva in 1750 and went blind in his early youth. The experiments conducted by Reaumur captured his interest, prompting him to verify them. He soon became passionately engrossed in this research, ultimately dedicating his entire life to studying bees, with the help of his smart and loyal servant, Francois Burnens. There’s nothing more poignant in the history of human struggle and achievement than the story of their collaboration, where the one who could only see with his mind guided the vision and efforts of another who had real sight; someone who, as we know, never actually saw a honeycomb with his own eyes yet managed to uncover the deep secrets behind its creation. It's a reminder that no matter our circumstances, we should never give up our pursuit of truth. I won’t list everything that apiarian science owes to Huber; it would be quicker to mention what it doesn’t owe him. His "New Observations on Bees," the first volume of which was written in 1789 as letters to Charles Bonnet and the second appearing twenty years later, has become a vital and rich resource for every writer that followed. While there may be a few errors and incomplete truths within, and despite significant advancements since his time in bee micrography and practical care, no major assertions he made have been disproven or found to be wrong; they remain solid and foundational in our current understanding.

{3}

{3}

Some years of silence followed these revelations; but soon a German clergyman, Dzierzon, discovered parthenogenesis, i. e. the virginal parturition of queens, and contrived the first hive with movable combs, thereby enabling the bee-keeper henceforth to take his share of the harvest of honey, without being forced to destroy his best colonies and in one instant annihilate the work of an entire year. This hive, still very imperfect, received masterly improvement at the hands of Langstroth, who invented the movable frame properly so called, which has been adopted in America with extraordinary success. Root, Quinby, Dadant, Cheshire, De Layens, Cowan, Heddon, Howard, etc., added still further and precious improvement. Then it occurred to Mehring that if bees were supplied with combs that had an artificial waxen foundation, they would be spared the labour of fashioning the wax and constructing the cells, which costs them much honey and the best part of their time; he found that the bees accepted these combs most readily, and adapted them to their requirements.

Some years of silence followed these revelations, but soon a German clergyman, Dzierzon, discovered parthenogenesis, meaning the virginal birth of queens, and created the first hive with movable frames. This innovation allowed beekeepers to harvest honey without having to destroy their best colonies and wipe out a year's worth of work in an instant. Although this hive was still quite imperfect, it was significantly improved by Langstroth, who invented the properly designed movable frame, which has been adopted in America with great success. Root, Quinby, Dadant, Cheshire, De Layens, Cowan, Heddon, Howard, and others contributed further valuable improvements. Then it occurred to Mehring that if bees were given frames with an artificial wax foundation, they would save the effort of making wax and building cells, which costs them a lot of honey and most of their time; he found that bees readily accepted these frames and adapted them to their needs.

Major de Hruschka invented the Honey-Extractor, which enables the honey to be withdrawn by centrifugal force without breaking the combs, etc. And thus, in a few years, the methods of apiculture underwent a radical change. The capacity and fruitfulness of the hives were trebled. Great and productive apiaries arose on every side. An end was put to the useless destruction of the most industrious cities, and to the odious selection of the least fit which was its result. Man truly became the master of the bees, although furtively, and without their knowledge; directing all things without giving an order, receiving obedience but not recognition. For the destiny once imposed by the seasons he has substituted his will. He repairs the injustice of the year, unites hostile republics, and equalises wealth. He restricts or augments the births, regulates the fecundity of the queen, dethrones her and instals another in her place, after dexterously obtaining the reluctant consent of a people who would be maddened at the mere suspicion of an inconceivable intervention. When he thinks fit, he will peacefully violate the secret of the sacred chambers, and the elaborate, tortuous policy of the palace. He will five or six times in succession deprive the bees of the fruit of their labour, without harming them, without their becoming discouraged or even impoverished. He proportions the store-houses and granaries of their dwellings to the harvest of flowers that the spring is spreading over the dip of the hills. He compels them to reduce the extravagant number of lovers who await the birth of the royal princesses. In a word he does with them what he will, he obtains what he will, provided always that what he seeks be in accordance with their laws and their virtues; for beyond all the desires of this strange god who has taken possession of them, who is too vast to be seen and too alien to be understood, their eyes see further than the eyes of the god himself; and their one thought is the accomplishment, with untiring sacrifice, of the mysterious duty of their race.

Major de Hruschka invented the Honey Extractor, which lets honey be extracted using centrifugal force without breaking the combs. In just a few years, the methods of beekeeping changed dramatically. The capacity and productivity of the hives tripled. Large, productive apiaries popped up everywhere. The unnecessary destruction of the hardest-working colonies ended, along with the terrible practice of selecting the weakest among them. Humans truly became the masters of bees, although covertly and without their awareness; controlling everything without issuing commands, gaining obedience without acknowledgment. He replaced the fate dictated by the seasons with his own will. He fixes the injustices of the year, unites rival colonies, and balances wealth. He controls or increases reproduction, regulates the queen's fertility, removes her, and installs another after skillfully winning the reluctant approval of a society that would go wild at the slightest hint of an unimaginable interference. Whenever he chooses, he will peacefully invade the sacred chambers and the complex, winding politics of the hive. He can repeatedly take away the fruits of their labor without harming them or causing them to feel disheartened or even impoverished. He adjusts the storage and granaries of their homes according to the bloom of flowers that spring brings to the rolling hills. He forces them to limit the excessive number of suitors waiting for the birth of the royal princesses. In short, he does what he wants with them, getting what he desires, as long as it aligns with their laws and values; for beyond all the wishes of this strange god who has taken control of them, who is too grand to be visible and too unfamiliar to be comprehended, their vision extends further than the deity’s itself; and their sole focus is the unwavering commitment to fulfill the mysterious duty of their kind.

{4}

{4}

Let us now, having learned from books all that they had to teach us of a very ancient history, leave the science others have acquired and look at the bees with our own eyes. An hour spent in the midst of the apiary will be less instructive, perhaps; but the things we shall see will be infinitely more stimulating and more actual.

Let’s now, having learned from books everything they have to offer about a very ancient history, set aside the knowledge others have gained and observe the bees with our own eyes. An hour spent in the apiary might not be as informative, but what we will witness will be infinitely more exciting and real.

I have not yet forgotten the first apiary I saw, where I learned to love the bees. It was many years ago, in a large village of Dutch Flanders, the sweet and pleasant country whose love for brilliant colour rivals that of Zealand even, the concave mirror of Holland; a country that gladly spreads out before us, as so many pretty, thoughtful toys, her illuminated gables, and waggons, and towers; her cupboards and clocks that gleam at the end of the passage; her little trees marshalled in line along quays and canal-banks, waiting, one almost might think, for some quiet, beneficent ceremony; her boats and her barges with sculptured poops, her flower-like doors and windows, immaculate dams, and elaborate, many-coloured drawbridges; and her little varnished houses, bright as new pottery, from which bell-shaped dames come forth, all a-glitter with silver and gold, to milk the cows in the white-hedged fields, or spread the linen on flowery lawns, cut into patterns of oval and lozenge, and most astoundingly green.

I still remember the first bee farm I visited, where I discovered my love for bees. It was many years ago in a large village in Dutch Flanders, a sweet and charming place that loves bright colors, rivaling even Zealand, the curved mirror of Holland; a land that lays out its beautiful, thoughtful features like delightful toys — illuminated gables, wagons, and towers; shining cupboards and clocks at the end of halls; little trees lined up along quays and canal banks, almost waiting for some quiet, kind event; boats and barges with sculpted sterns; flower-like doors and windows; pristine dams; and intricate, colorful drawbridges; and its little varnished houses, bright as new pottery, from which bell-shaped ladies emerge, sparkling with silver and gold, to milk cows in the white-hedged fields or spread linens on flowery lawns, perfectly cut into oval and diamond shapes, and strikingly green.

To this spot, where life would seem more restricted than elsewhere—if it be possible for life indeed to become restricted—a sort of aged philosopher had retired; an old man somewhat akin to Virgil's—

To this place, where life seems more limited than anywhere else—if it's even possible for life to be limited—a kind of old philosopher had withdrawn; an old man somewhat similar to Virgil's—

     "Man equal to kings, and approaching the gods;"
"Man equal to kings and nearing the gods;"

whereto Lafontaine might have added,—

where Lafontaine might have added,—

     "And, like the gods, content and at rest."
"And, like the gods, satisfied and at peace."

Here had he built his refuge, being a little weary; not disgusted, for the large aversions are unknown to the sage; but a little weary of interrogating men, whose answers to the only interesting questions one can put concerning nature and her veritable laws are far less simple than those that are given by animals and plants. His happiness, like the Scythian philosopher's, lay all in the beauties of his garden; and best-loved and visited most often, was the apiary, composed of twelve domes of straw, some of which he had painted a bright pink, and some a clear yellow, but most of all a tender blue; having noticed, long before Sir John Lubbock's demonstrations, the bees' fondness for this colour.

Here he had built his escape, feeling a bit tired; not disgusted, because a sage doesn't experience strong aversions; but just a little worn out from questioning people, whose answers to the only intriguing questions about nature and its true laws are much more complicated than those given by animals and plants. His happiness, like that of the Scythian philosopher, was found entirely in the beauty of his garden; and the place he loved best and visited the most was the beehive, made up of twelve straw domes, some of which he had painted bright pink, some a clear yellow, but most of all a gentle blue; having noticed long before Sir John Lubbock's findings that bees are attracted to this color.

These hives stood against the wall of the house, in the angle formed by one of those pleasant and graceful Dutch kitchens whose earthenware dresser, all bright with copper and tin, reflected itself through the open door on to the peaceful canal. And the water, burdened with these familiar images beneath its curtain of poplars, led one's eyes to a calm horizon of mills and of meadows.

These hives were positioned against the wall of the house, in the corner created by one of those charming and elegant Dutch kitchens, where the earthenware dresser, shining with copper and tin, was mirrored through the open door onto the serene canal. The water, holding onto these familiar reflections beneath its curtain of poplars, drew one’s gaze to a peaceful horizon of windmills and fields.

Here, as in all places, the hives lent a new meaning to the flowers and the silence, the balm of the air and the rays of the sun. One seemed to have drawn very near to the festival spirit of nature. One was content to rest at this radiant crossroad, where the aerial ways converge and divide that the busy and tuneful bearers of all country perfumes unceasingly travel from dawn unto dusk. One heard the musical voice of the garden, whose loveliest hours revealed their rejoicing soul and sang of their gladness. One came hither, to the school of the bees, to be taught the preoccupations of all-powerful nature, the harmonious concord of the three kingdoms, the indefatigable organisation of life, and the lesson of ardent and disinterested work; and another lesson too, with a moral as good, that the heroic workers taught there, and emphasised, as it were, with the fiery darts of their myriad wings, was to appreciate the somewhat vague savour of leisure, to enjoy the almost unspeakable delights of those immaculate days that revolved on themselves in the fields of space, forming merely a transparent globe, as void of memory as the happiness without alloy.

Here, like everywhere else, the beehives gave new meaning to the flowers and the quiet, the calming air, and the sunlight. It felt like one was very close to the festive spirit of nature. One could relax at this bright crossroads, where the skies meet and split, and the busy, musical bearers of all the country’s scents endlessly travel from dawn to dusk. You could hear the beautiful voice of the garden, whose most delightful moments revealed its joyful essence and sang of happiness. People came here, to the school of the bees, to learn the concerns of all-powerful nature, the harmonious connection of the three kingdoms, the tireless organization of life, and the lesson of passionate and selfless work; and another valuable lesson taught there, emphasized by the lively flurry of their countless wings, was to appreciate the somewhat elusive joy of rest, to savor the nearly indescribable pleasures of those pure days that spun around themselves in the open fields, forming a clear sphere, as free of memory as happiness without blemish.

{5}

{5}

In order to follow, as simply as possible, the life of the bees through the year, we will take a hive that awakes in the spring and duly starts on its labours; and then we shall meet, in their natural order, all the great episodes, viz.: the formation and departure of the swarm, the foundation of the new city, the birth, combat and nuptial flight of the young queens, the massacre of the males, and finally, the return of the sleep of winter. With each of these episodes there will go the necessary explanations as to the laws, habits, peculiarities and events that produce and accompany it; so that, when arrived at the end of the bee's short year, which extends only from April to the last days of September, we shall have gazed upon all the mysteries of the palace of honey. Before we open it, therefore, and throw a general glance around, we only need say that the hive is composed of a queen, the mother of all her people; of thousands of workers or neuters who are incomplete and sterile females; and lastly of some hundreds of males, from whom one shall be chosen as the sole and unfortunate consort of the queen that the workers will elect in the future, after the more or less voluntary departure of the reigning mother.

To simply follow the life of bees throughout the year, we'll focus on a hive that wakes up in spring and begins its activities. We'll encounter, in their natural sequence, all the major events: the formation and departure of the swarm, the establishment of a new hive, the birth, fight, and mating flight of the young queens, the culling of the males, and finally, the return to the stillness of winter. Each of these events will come with the necessary explanations about the laws, habits, peculiarities, and occurrences that create and accompany them. By the end of the bees' short year, which lasts from April to the end of September, we will have explored all the mysteries of the honey palace. Before we open it up and take a general look around, we just need to mention that the hive consists of a queen, the mother of all her workers; thousands of workers or neuters, who are incomplete and sterile females; and finally, a few hundred males, from which one will be chosen as the sole and unfortunate mate of the queen that the workers will select in the future, following the more or less voluntary departure of the current queen.

{6}

{6}

The first time that we open a hive there comes over us an emotion akin to that we might feel at profaning some unknown object, charged perhaps with dreadful surprise, as a tomb. A legend of menace and peril still clings to the bees. There is the distressful recollection of her sting, which produces a pain so characteristic that one knows not wherewith to compare it; a kind of destroying dryness, a flame of the desert rushing over the wounded limb, as though these daughters of the sun had distilled a dazzling poison from their father's angry rays, in order more effectively to defend the treasure they gather from his beneficent hours.

The first time we open a hive, we feel an emotion similar to what we might experience when we unintentionally disturb some mysterious object, perhaps something as shocking as a tomb. There's a lingering sense of danger and threat associated with bees. We also remember the pain from their sting, which is so unique that it's hard to compare it to anything else; it's like a burning dryness, a fiery desert wind sweeping over the injured part, as if these daughters of the sun have extracted a brilliant poison from their father's fierce rays to better protect the bounty they collect during his generous hours.

It is true that were some one who neither knows nor respects the customs and character of the bee suddenly to fling open the hive, it would turn at once into a burning bush of heroism and anger; but the slight amount of skill needed to handle it with impunity can be most readily acquired. Let but a little smoke be deftly applied, much coolness and gentleness be shown, and our well-armed workers will suffer themselves to be despoiled without dreaming of drawing their sting. It is not the fact, as some have maintained, that the bees recognise their master; nor have they any fear of man; but at the smell of the smoke, at the large slow gestures that traverse their dwellings without threatening them, they imagine that this is not the attack of an enemy against whom defence is possible, but that it is a force or a natural catastrophe whereto they do well to submit.

It’s true that if someone who doesn’t know or respect the habits and nature of bees suddenly opened a hive, it would instantly become a chaotic scene of aggression and fury; however, the minimal skill required to manage it safely can be easily learned. A little smoke applied skillfully, along with calmness and gentleness, allows our well-armed workers to be handled without any thought of stinging. It’s not accurate, as some have claimed, that bees recognize their master or fear humans; instead, the smell of smoke and the slow, gentle movements around their home make them think it’s not an attack from an enemy they can defend against, but rather a natural force or disaster that it’s best to submit to.

Instead of vainly struggling, therefore, they do what they can to safeguard the future; and, obeying a foresight that for once is in error, they fly to their reserves of honey, into which they eagerly dip in order to possess within themselves the wherewithal to start a new city, immediately and no matter where, should the ancient one be destroyed or they be compelled to forsake it.

Instead of futilely fighting, they do what they can to secure the future; and, following a misguided instinct, they rush to their honey reserves, eagerly dipping into them to gather what they need to kickstart a new city, right away and anywhere, in case the old one is destroyed or they have to leave it behind.

{7}

{7}

The first impression of the novice before whom an observation-hive* is opened will be one of some disappointment. He had been told that this little glass case contained an unparalleled activity, an infinite number of wise laws, and a startling amalgam of mystery, experience, genius, calculation, science, of various industries, of certitude and prescience, of intelligent habits and curious feelings and virtues. All that he sees is a confused mass of little reddish groups, somewhat resembling roasted coffee-berries, or bunches of raisins piled against the glass. They look more dead than alive; their movements are slow, incoherent, and incomprehensible. Can these be the wonderful drops of light he had seen but a moment ago, unceasingly flashing and sparkling, as they darted among the pearls and the gold of a thousand wide-open calyces?

The first impression of a newcomer when an observation hive* is opened will be one of disappointment. They had been told that this little glass case held incredible activity, countless wise laws, and a fascinating mix of mystery, experience, genius, calculation, science, various skills, certainty, foresight, intelligent behaviors, and intriguing feelings and virtues. All they see is a chaotic mass of small reddish clusters, somewhat like roasted coffee beans or clumps of raisins pressed against the glass. They appear more dead than alive; their movements are slow, jumbled, and confusing. Can these be the amazing flashes of light they had just seen moments ago, constantly darting and sparkling among the pearls and gold of a thousand wide-open flowers?

By observation-hive is meant a hive of glass, furnished with black curtains or shutters. The best kind have only one comb, thus permitting both faces to be studied. These hives can be placed in a drawing-room, library, etc., without inconvenience or danger. The bees that inhabit the one I have in my study in Paris are able even in the stony desert of that great city, to find the wherewithal to nourish themselves and to prosper.

An observation hive is a glass hive, equipped with black curtains or shutters. The best ones have just one comb, allowing both sides to be observed. These hives can be set up in a living room, library, etc., without causing any issues or risks. The bees that live in the one I have in my study in Paris manage to find what they need to thrive, even in the concrete jungle of that big city.

They appear to be shivering in the darkness, to be numbed, suffocated, so closely are they huddled together; one might fancy they were ailing captives, or queens dethroned, who have had their one moment of glory in the midst of their radiant garden, and are now compelled to return to the shameful squalor of their poor overcrowded home.

They seem to be shivering in the dark, feeling numb and suffocated, so tightly wrapped up together; one might think they were sick captives or dethroned queens who once experienced a moment of glory in their beautiful garden, but are now forced to return to the shameful squalor of their cramped home.

It is with them as with all that is deeply real; they must be studied, and one must learn how to study them. The inhabitant of another planet who should see men and women coming and going almost imperceptibly through our streets, crowding at certain times around certain buildings, or waiting for one knows not what, without apparent movement, in the depths of their dwellings, might conclude therefrom that they, too, were miserable and inert. It takes time to distinguish the manifold activity contained in this inertia.

It’s the same with everything that is truly real; they need to be studied, and you have to learn how to study them. If an alien were to observe men and women moving almost unnoticed through our streets, gathering at certain times around particular buildings, or waiting for who knows what, seemingly frozen in the depths of their homes, they might assume that we are also miserable and lifeless. It takes time to recognize the diverse activity within this stillness.

And indeed every one of the little almost motionless groups in the hive is incessantly working, each at a different trade. Repose is unknown to any; and such, for instance, as seem the most torpid, as they hang in dead clusters against the glass, are intrusted with the most mysterious and fatiguing task of all: it is they who secrete and form the wax. But the details of this universal activity will be given in their place. For the moment we need only call attention to the essential trait in the nature of the bee which accounts for the extraordinary agglomeration of the various workers. The bee is above all, and even to a greater extent than the ant, a creature of the crowd. She can live only in the midst of a multitude. When she leaves the hive, which is so densely packed that she has to force her way with blows of her head through the living walls that enclose her, she departs from her proper element. She will dive for an instant into flower-filled space, as the swimmer will dive into the sea that is filled with pearls, but under pain of death it behoves her at regular intervals to return and breathe the crowd as the swimmer must return and breathe the air. Isolate her, and however abundant the food or favourable the temperature, she will expire in a few days not of hunger or cold, but of loneliness. From the crowd, from the city, she derives an invisible aliment that is as necessary to her as honey. This craving will help to explain the spirit of the laws of the hive. For in them the individual is nothing, her existence conditional only, and herself, for one indifferent moment, a winged organ of the race. Her whole life is an entire sacrifice to the manifold, everlasting being whereof she forms part. It is strange to note that it was not always so. We find even to-day, among the melliferous hymenoptera, all the stages of progressive civilisation of our own domestic bee. At the bottom of the scale we find her working alone, in wretchedness, often not seeing her offspring (the Prosopis, the Colletes, etc.); sometimes living in the midst of the limited family that she produces annually (as in the case of the humble-bee). Then she forms temporary associations (the Panurgi, the Dasypodoe, the Hacliti, etc.) and at last we arrive, through successive stages, at the almost perfect but pitiless society of our hives, where the individual is entirely merged in the republic, and the republic in its turn invariably sacrificed to the abstract and immortal city of the future.

And indeed, every one of the small, almost motionless groups in the hive is constantly busy, each doing a different job. No one gets to rest; even those that seem the most sluggish, hanging in clusters against the glass, are taking on the most mysterious and demanding task of all: they are the ones who produce and shape the wax. But the specifics of this widespread activity will be shared later. For now, we need to highlight the key characteristic of bees that explains the incredible gathering of various workers. The bee is primarily, even more than the ant, a social creature. She can only thrive in the midst of a crowd. When she leaves the hive, which is packed so tightly that she has to push her way through the living walls that surround her, she is stepping out of her element. She may momentarily dive into the flower-filled space, like a swimmer plunging into a sea filled with pearls, but she must regularly return to the crowd, just as a swimmer must come back to the air, or risk dying. If she is isolated, even with plenty of food or favorable temperatures, she will perish in a few days—not from hunger or cold, but from loneliness. She derives an invisible sustenance from the crowd, as essential to her as honey. This need helps explain the spirit behind the laws of the hive. In these laws, the individual means nothing; her existence is conditional, and she is, for one indifferent moment, merely a winged part of the species. Her entire life is dedicated to the collective, everlasting being of which she is a part. It's interesting to note that it hasn't always been this way. Even today, among the nectar-producing wasps, we find all the stages of progressive development of our domestic bee. At the lowest level, we see her working alone, in hardship, often not even seeing her offspring (like the Prosopis, the Colletes, etc.); sometimes living among the limited family she produces each year (as in the case of the humble-bee). Then she forms temporary partnerships (like the Panurgi, the Dasypodoe, the Hacliti, etc.), and eventually, after successive stages, we reach the nearly perfect yet ruthless society of our hives, where the individual is completely absorbed into the collective, which in turn is consistently sacrificed for the abstract, immortal city of the future.

{8}

{8}

Let us not too hastily deduce from these facts conclusions that apply to man. He possesses the power of withstanding certain of nature's laws; and to know whether such resistance be right or wrong is the gravest and obscurest point in his morality. But it is deeply interesting to discover what the will of nature may be in a different world; and this will is revealed with extraordinary clearness in the evolution of the hymenoptera, which, of all the inhabitants of this globe, possess the highest degree of intellect after that of man. The aim of nature is manifestly the improvement of the race; but no less manifest is her inability, or refusal, to obtain such improvement except at the cost of the liberty, the rights, and the happiness of the individual. In proportion as a society organises itself, and rises in the scale, so does a shrinkage enter the private life of each one of its members. Where there is progress, it is the result only of a more and more complete sacrifice of the individual to the general interest. Each one is compelled, first of all, to renounce his vices, which are acts of independence. For instance, at the last stage but one of apiarian civilisation, we find the humble-bees, which are like our cannibals. The adult workers are incessantly hovering around the eggs, which they seek to devour, and the mother has to display the utmost stubbornness in their defence. Then having freed himself from his most dangerous vices, each individual has to acquire a certain number of more and more painful virtues. Among the humble-bees, for instance, the workers do not dream of renouncing love, whereas our domestic bee lives in a state of perpetual chastity. And indeed we soon shall show how much more she has to abandon, in exchange for the comfort and security of the hive, for its architectural, economic, and political perfection; and we shall return to the evolution of the hymenoptera in the chapter devoted to the progress of the species.

Let’s not rush to draw conclusions from these facts that apply to humans. People have the ability to resist certain laws of nature; figuring out if that resistance is right or wrong is one of the most serious and complex issues in morality. However, it’s fascinating to explore what nature’s intentions might be in a different world, and these intentions are surprisingly clear in the evolution of the hymenoptera, which, among all Earth’s inhabitants, have the highest level of intelligence after humans. Nature's obvious goal is to improve the species, yet it’s equally clear that this improvement often comes at the expense of individual freedom, rights, and happiness. As society organizes itself and advances, we see a retreat in the personal lives of its members. With progress, it often results from increasing sacrifices of individual desires for the greater good. Each person is first required to give up their vices, which are expressions of independence. For example, at the penultimate stage of bee civilization, we see humble bees acting like our cannibals. The adult workers constantly hover around the eggs, trying to eat them, while the mother has to fiercely defend them. Once they have rid themselves of their most harmful vices, each individual must develop a number of more painful virtues. Among humble bees, for instance, the workers don’t even think about giving up love, whereas our domestic bee lives in a state of constant chastity. In fact, we will soon demonstrate just how much more she has to sacrifice in exchange for the comfort and security of the hive, as well as its architectural, economic, and political excellence; we will revisit the evolution of the hymenoptera in the chapter focused on species progress.





II — THE SWARM

{9}

WE will now, so as to draw more closely to nature, consider the different episodes of the swarm as they come to pass in an ordinary hive, which is ten or twenty times more populous than an observation one, and leaves the bees entirely free and untrammelled.

We will now, to get closer to nature, look at the different events of the swarm as they happen in a regular hive, which is ten or twenty times more populated than an observation hive, allowing the bees to be completely free and unrestrained.

Here, then, they have shaken off the torpor of winter. The queen started laying again in the very first days of February, and the workers have flocked to the willows and nut-trees, gorse and violets, anemones and lungworts. Then spring invades the earth, and cellar and stream with honey and pollen, while each day beholds the birth of thousands of bees. The overgrown males now all sally forth from their cells, and disport themselves on the combs; and so crowded does the too prosperous city become that hundreds of belated workers, coming back from the flowers towards evening, will vainly seek shelter within, and will be forced to spend the night on the threshold, where they will be decimated by the cold. Restlessness seizes the people, and the old queen begins to stir. She feels that a new destiny is being prepared. She has religiously fulfilled her duty as a good creatress; and from this duty done there result only tribulation and sorrow. An invincible power menaces her tranquillity; she will soon be forced to quit this city of hers, where she has reigned. But this city is her work, it is she, herself. She is not its queen in the sense in which men use the word. She issues no orders; she obeys, as meekly as the humblest of her subjects, the masked power, sovereignly wise, that for the present, and till we attempt to locate it, we will term the "spirit of the hive." But she is the unique organ of love; she is the mother of the city. She founded it amid uncertainty and poverty. She has peopled it with her own substance; and all who move within its walls—workers, males, larvae, nymphs, and the young princesses whose approaching birth will hasten her own departure, one of them being already designed as her successor by the "spirit of the hive"—all these have issued from her flanks.

Here, they have finally shaken off the sluggishness of winter. The queen started laying eggs in the very first days of February, and the worker bees have rushed to the willows and nut trees, gorse and violets, anemones and lungworts. Then spring sweeps across the earth, filling the cellar and stream with honey and pollen, while each day witnesses the birth of thousands of bees. The overgrown males now all emerge from their cells and hang out on the combs; and the city becomes so crowded that hundreds of late-returning workers, coming back from foraging in the evening, will unsuccessfully try to find shelter inside and will have to spend the night on the threshold, where they’ll be chilled to death. A sense of restlessness takes over, and the old queen starts to feel it. She knows a new fate is coming. She has faithfully fulfilled her role as a good mother; but from this duty comes only struggle and sorrow. An unstoppable force threatens her peace; she will soon have to leave this city she has ruled. But this city is her creation, it is her very essence. She's not its queen in the way that humans think of queens. She doesn't give orders; she obeys, just like the humblest of her subjects, the hidden power, superbly wise, that for now, until we figure it out, we'll call the "spirit of the hive." But she is the single source of love; she is the mother of the city. She built it in times of uncertainty and hardship. She has filled it with her own essence; and all who move within its walls—workers, males, larvae, nymphs, and the young princesses whose imminent births will speed up her own departure, one of whom has already been chosen as her successor by the "spirit of the hive"—all of them have come from her.

{10}

{10}

What is this "spirit of the hive"—where does it reside? It is not like the special instinct that teaches the bird to construct its well planned nest, and then seek other skies when the day for migration returns. Nor is it a kind of mechanical habit of the race, or blind craving for life, that will fling the bees upon any wild hazard the moment an unforeseen event shall derange the accustomed order of phenomena. On the contrary, be the event never so masterful, the "spirit of the hive" still will follow it, step by step, like an alert and quickwitted slave, who is able to derive advantage even from his master's most dangerous orders.

What is this "spirit of the hive"—where does it live? It's not like the unique instinct that guides a bird to build its carefully designed nest and then fly to different skies when migration time comes. Nor is it simply a mechanical habit of the species, or a blind urge for survival, that drives bees into any risky situation the moment something unexpected disrupts their usual routine. On the contrary, no matter how overwhelming the event, the "spirit of the hive" will still follow it, step by step, like a quick-witted servant who can find a way to benefit even from their master's most dangerous commands.

It disposes pitilessly of the wealth and the happiness, the liberty and life, of all this winged people; and yet with discretion, as though governed itself by some great duty. It regulates day by day the number of births, and contrives that these shall strictly accord with the number of flowers that brighten the country-side. It decrees the queen's deposition or warns her that she must depart; it compels her to bring her own rivals into the world, and rears them royally, protecting them from their mother's political hatred. So, too, in accordance with the generosity of the flowers, the age of the spring, and the probable dangers of the nuptial flight, will it permit or forbid the first-born of the virgin princesses to slay in their cradles her younger sisters, who are singing the song of the queens. At other times, when the season wanes, and flowery hours grow shorter, it will command the workers themselves to slaughter the whole imperial brood, that the era of revolutions may close, and work become the sole object of all. The "spirit of the hive" is prudent and thrifty, but by no means parsimonious. And thus, aware, it would seem, that nature's laws are somewhat wild and extravagant in all that pertains to love, it tolerates, during summer days of abundance, the embarrassing presence in the hive of three or four hundred males, from whose ranks the queen about to be born shall select her lover; three or four hundred foolish, clumsy, useless, noisy creatures, who are pretentious, gluttonous, dirty, coarse, totally and scandalously idle, insatiable, and enormous.

It mercilessly disposes of the wealth and happiness, freedom and life, of all these winged creatures; yet it does so with discretion, as if driven by some higher duty. It manages the number of births day by day, ensuring they align closely with the number of flowers that dot the landscape. It decides when to remove the queen or alerts her that she needs to leave; it forces her to give birth to her own competitors and raises them royally, shielding them from their mother's political hostility. Likewise, based on the generosity of the flowers, the season of spring, and the potential risks of the mating flight, it will allow or prevent the first-born of the virgin princesses from killing their younger sisters, who are singing the song of the queens. At other times, as the season comes to a close and the flowery hours decrease, it will order the workers to wipe out the entire imperial brood so that the age of revolutions can end and work becomes the only focus. The "spirit of the hive" is sensible and careful, but not stingy. Thus, seemingly aware that nature's rules can be a bit wild and excessive when it comes to love, it tolerates, during the abundant summer days, the awkward presence of three or four hundred males, from whom the soon-to-be-born queen will choose her mate; three or four hundred foolish, clumsy, useless, noisy beings who are pretentious, greedy, dirty, crude, entirely and scandalously lazy, insatiable, and gigantic.

But after the queen's impregnation, when flowers begin to close sooner, and open later, the spirit one morning will coldly decree the simultaneous and general massacre of every male. It regulates the workers' labours, with due regard to their age; it allots their task to the nurses who tend the nymphs and the larvae, the ladies of honour who wait on the queen and never allow her out of their sight; the house-bees who air, refresh, or heat the hive by fanning their wings, and hasten the evaporation of the honey that may be too highly charged with water; the architects, masons, wax-workers, and sculptors who form the chain and construct the combs; the foragers who sally forth to the flowers in search of the nectar that turns into honey, of the pollen that feeds the nymphs and the larvae, the propolis that welds and strengthens the buildings of the city, or the water and salt required by the youth of the nation. Its orders have gone to the chemists who ensure the preservation of the honey by letting a drop of formic acid fall in from the end of their sting; to the capsule-makers who seal down the cells when the treasure is ripe, to the sweepers who maintain public places and streets most irreproachably clean, to the bearers whose duty it is to remove the corpses; and to the amazons of the guard who keep watch on the threshold by night and by day, question comers and goers, recognise the novices who return from their very first flight, scare away vagabonds, marauders and loiterers, expel all intruders, attack redoubtable foes in a body, and, if need be, barricade the entrance.

But after the queen becomes pregnant, when flowers start to close up sooner and open later, the spirit will one morning coldly decide on the simultaneous and complete elimination of every male. It organizes the workers' tasks based on their age; it assigns duties to the nurses who care for the nymphs and larvae, the ladies-in-waiting who attend to the queen and never let her out of their sight; the house-bees who ventilate, cool, or warm the hive by fanning their wings, and speed up the evaporation of honey that might be too watery; the architects, masons, wax-workers, and sculptors who build the chains and construct the combs; the foragers who venture out to the flowers in search of the nectar that becomes honey, the pollen that nourishes the nymphs and larvae, the propolis that strengthens and binds the structures of the colony, or the water and salt needed by the young of the community. Its orders go to the chemists who preserve the honey by letting a drop of formic acid fall from the tip of their sting; to the capsule-makers who seal the cells when the treasure is ready, to the cleaners who keep public places and streets spotless, to the bearers tasked with removing the corpses; and to the guard amazons who watch over the entrance day and night, interrogate those who come and go, recognize the newcomers returning from their first flight, scare away wanderers, raiders, and loiterers, drive off any intruders, confront formidable enemies as a group, and, if necessary, block the entrance.

Finally, it is the spirit of the hive that fixes the hour of the great annual sacrifice to the genius of the race: the hour, that is, of the swarm; when we find a whole people, who have attained the topmost pinnacle of prosperity and power, suddenly abandoning to the generation to come their wealth and their palaces, their homes and the fruits of their labour; themselves content to encounter the hardships and perils of a new and distant country. This act, be it conscious or not, undoubtedly passes the limits of human morality. Its result will sometimes be ruin, but poverty always; and the thrice-happy city is scattered abroad in obedience to a law superior to its own happiness. Where has this law been decreed, which, as we soon shall find, is by no means as blind and inevitable as one might believe? Where, in what assembly, what council, what intellectual and moral sphere, does this spirit reside to whom all must submit, itself being vassal to an heroic duty, to an intelligence whose eyes are persistently fixed on the future?

Finally, it's the spirit of the hive that determines the time of the great annual sacrifice to the genius of the race: the time of the swarm; when we see an entire society, having reached the highest point of prosperity and power, suddenly leaving behind their wealth and their grand homes, their lives and the fruits of their labor; willingly facing the challenges and dangers of a new and distant land. This action, whether intentional or not, definitely goes beyond the limits of human morality. Its outcome may sometimes be destruction, but it always leads to poverty; and the incredibly fortunate city is dispersed in obedience to a law that is greater than its own happiness. Where has this law been defined, which, as we will soon see, is not nearly as blind and unavoidable as one might think? Where, in what assembly, council, or realm of thought and ethics, does this spirit dwell to which everyone must submit, itself being subject to a heroic duty, to an intelligence focused on the future?

It comes to pass with the bees as with most of the things in this world; we remark some few of their habits; we say they do this, they work in such and such fashion, their queens are born thus, their workers are virgin, they swarm at a certain time. And then we imagine we know them, and ask nothing more. We watch them hasten from flower to flower, we see the constant agitation within the hive; their life seems very simple to us, and bounded, like every life, by the instinctive cares of reproduction and nourishment. But let the eye draw near, and endeavour to see; and at once the least phenomenon of all becomes overpoweringly complex; we are confronted by the enigma of intellect, of destiny, will, aim, means, causes; the incomprehensible organisation of the most insignificant act of life.

It turns out that the bees are like many other things in this world; we notice a few of their habits and say they do this, they work like this, their queens are born this way, their workers are female, and they swarm at a specific time. Then we think we understand them and don’t ask anything more. We watch them rush from flower to flower, and we see the constant activity inside the hive; their lives seem very straightforward to us, limited like every life, by the instinctual needs of reproduction and food. But if we take a closer look and really try to see, even the simplest behavior becomes incredibly complex; we face the mystery of thought, fate, intention, purpose, methods, causes; the bewildering organization behind even the tiniest act of life.

{11}

{11}

Our hive, then, is preparing to swarm; making ready for the great immolation to the exacting gods of the race. In obedience to the order of the spirit—an order that to us may well seem incomprehensible, for it is entirely opposed to all our own instincts and feelings—60,000 or 70,000 bees out of the 80,000 or 90,000 that form the whole population, will abandon the maternal city at the prescribed hour. They will not leave at a moment of despair; or desert, with sudden and wild resolve, a home laid waste by famine, disease, or war. No, the exile has long been planned, and the favourable hour patiently awaited. Were the hive poor, had it suffered from pillage or storm, had misfortune befallen the royal family, the bees would not forsake it. They leave it only when it has attained the apogee of its prosperity; at a time when, after the arduous labours of the spring, the immense palace of wax has its 120,000 well-arranged cells overflowing with new honey, and with the many-coloured flour, known as "bees' bread," on which nymphs and larvae are fed.

Our hive is getting ready to swarm, preparing for the significant sacrifice to the demanding gods of the species. Following the command of the spirit—something that might seem puzzling to us because it goes completely against our instincts and feelings—60,000 or 70,000 bees out of the total 80,000 or 90,000 will leave the mother city at the scheduled time. They won't leave out of despair or suddenly abandon a home destroyed by hunger, sickness, or war. No, this departure has been carefully planned, and they have patiently waited for the right moment. If the hive were struggling, if it had been robbed or hit by a storm, or if disaster had struck the royal family, the bees wouldn’t leave. They only depart when the hive has reached the peak of its prosperity; at a time when, after the hard work of spring, the vast wax palace has its 120,000 well-arranged cells brimming with fresh honey and the colorful flour known as "bees' bread," which nourishes the nymphs and larvae.

Never is the hive more beautiful than on the eve of its heroic renouncement, in its unrivalled hour of fullest abundance and joy; serene for all its apparent excitement and feverishness.

Never is the hive more beautiful than on the eve of its brave decision to let go, in its unmatched moment of complete abundance and joy; calm despite all its visible excitement and intensity.

Let us endeavour to picture it to ourselves, not as it appears to the bees,—for we cannot tell in what magical, formidable fashion things may be reflected in the 6,000 or 7,000 facets of their lateral eyes and the triple cyclopean eye on their brow,—but as it would seem to us, were we of their stature. From the height of a dome more colossal than that of St. Peter's at Rome waxen walls descend to the ground, balanced in the void and the darkness; gigantic and manifold, vertical and parallel geometric constructions, to which, for relative precision, audacity, and vastness, no human structure is comparable. Each of these walls, whose substance still is immaculate and fragrant, of virginal, silvery freshness, contains thousands of cells, that are stored with provisions sufficient to feed the whole people for several weeks. Here, lodged in transparent cells, are the pollens, love-ferment of every flower of spring, making brilliant splashes of red and yellow, of black and mauve. Close by, in twenty thousand reservoirs, sealed with a seal that shall only be broken on days of supreme distress, the honey of April is stored, most limpid and perfumed of all, wrapped round with long and magnificent embroidery of gold, whose borders hang stiff and rigid. Still lower the honey of May matures, in great open vats, by whose side watchful cohorts maintain an incessant current of air. In the centre, and far from the light whose diamond rays steal in through the only opening, in the warmest part of the hive, there stands the abode of the future; here does it sleep, and wake. For this is the royal domain of the brood-cells, set apart for the queen and her acolytes; about 10,000 cells wherein the eggs repose, 15,000 or 16,000 chambers tenanted by larvae, 40,000 dwellings inhabited by white nymphs to whom thousands of nurses minister.* And finally, in the holy of holies of these partss are the three, four, six, or twelve sealed palaces, vast in size compared with the others, where the adolescent princesses lie who await their hour, wrapped in a kind of shroud, all of them motionless and pale, and fed in the darkness.

Let’s try to imagine it, not as the bees see it—because we can’t know how things appear in the 6,000 or 7,000 facets of their eyes and the single cyclopean eye on their forehead—but as it would look to us if we were their size. From the height of a dome even larger than St. Peter's in Rome, waxen walls descend to the ground, suspended in the emptiness and darkness; gigantic and various, vertically and parallel geometric structures that no human building can match in terms of precision, boldness, and scale. Each of these walls, still clean and fragrant, with a virginal, silvery freshness, holds thousands of cells filled with enough provisions to feed the entire population for several weeks. Here, in clear cells, are the pollens, the love-pollen of every spring flower, making vibrant splashes of red and yellow, black and mauve. Nearby, in twenty thousand reservoirs, sealed with a closure that will only be opened in times of extreme need, is stored the honey of April, the clearest and most fragrant of all, wrapped in long and magnificent golden embroidery, with borders that hang stiff and rigid. Lower down, the honey of May ripens in large open vats, watched over by vigilant groups that maintain a constant flow of air. In the center, far from the light that streams in through the only opening, in the warmest part of the hive, lies the home of the future; here it sleeps and awakens. This is the royal domain of the brood cells, reserved for the queen and her attendants; about 10,000 cells where the eggs rest, 15,000 or 16,000 chambers occupied by larvae, 40,000 places inhabited by white nymphs cared for by thousands of nurses.* And finally, in the innermost sanctum of these parts are three, four, six, or twelve sealed palaces, vast compared to the others, where the young princesses wait for their time, wrapped in a kind of shroud, all motionless and pale, and fed in the dark.

     *The figures given here are scrupulously exact. They are
     those of a well-filled hive in full prosperity.
     *The figures provided here are meticulously accurate. They represent a thriving, well-populated hive at its peak.

On the day, then, that the Spirit of the Hive has ordained, a certain part of the population will go forth, selected in accordance with sure and immovable laws, and make way for hopes that as yet are formless. In the sleeping city there remain the males, from whose ranks the royal lover shall come, the very young bees that tend the brood-cells, and some thousands of workers who continue to forage abroad, to guard the accumulated treasure, and preserve the moral traditions of the hive. For each hive has its own code of morals. There are some that are very virtuous and some that are very perverse; and a careless bee-keeper will often corrupt his people, destroy their respect for the property of others, incite them to pillage, and induce in them habits of conquest and idleness which will render them sources of danger to all the little republics around. These things result from the bee's discovery that work among distant flowers, whereof many hundreds must be visited to form one drop of honey, is not the only or promptest method of acquiring wealth, but that it is easier to enter ill-guarded cities by stratagem, or force her way into others too weak for self-defence. Nor is it easy to restore to the paths of duty a hive that has become thus depraved.

On the day that the Spirit of the Hive has decided, a certain part of the population will head out, chosen according to strict and unchanging laws, to create space for hopes that are still undefined. In the sleeping city, the males remain, from whom the royal lover will emerge, the very young bees that care for the brood-cells, and several thousand workers who keep foraging, protect the gathered treasure, and uphold the moral traditions of the hive. Each hive has its own set of morals. Some are very virtuous, while others are quite corrupt; a careless beekeeper can easily lead his bees astray, destroy their respect for others' property, incite them to steal, and instill habits of conquest and laziness that can make them a threat to all the little communities around. These issues arise from the bee's realization that working among distant flowers, visiting hundreds to produce a single drop of honey, isn’t the only or quickest way to gain wealth; it’s often easier to sneak into poorly defended areas or force entry into those too weak to protect themselves. It is also difficult to bring back to the right path a hive that has become morally corrupt.

{13}

{13}

All things go to prove that it is not the queen, but the spirit of the hive, that decides on the swarm. With this queen of ours it happens as with many a chief among men, who though he appear to give orders, is himself obliged to obey commands far more mysterious, far more inexplicable, than those he issues to his subordinates. The hour once fixed, the spirit will probably let it be known at break of dawn, or the previous night, if indeed not two nights before; for scarcely has the sun drunk in the first drops of dew when a most unaccustomed stir, whose meaning the bee-keeper rarely will fail to grasp, is to be noticed within and around the buzzing city. At times one would almost appear to detect a sign of dispute, hesitation, recoil. It will happen even that for day after day a strange emotion, apparently without cause, will appear and vanish in this transparent, golden throng. Has a cloud that we cannot see crept across the sky that the bees are watching; or is their intellect battling with a new regret? Does a winged council debate the necessity of the departure? Of this we know nothing; as we know nothing of the manner in which the spirit conveys its resolution to the crowd. Certain as it may seem that the bees communicate with each other, we know not whether this be done in human fashion. It is possible even that their own refrain may be inaudible to them: the murmur that comes to us heavily laden with perfume of honey, the ecstatic whisper of fairest summer days that the bee-keeper loves so well, the festival song of labour that rises and falls around the hive in the crystal of the hour, and might almost be the chant of the eager flowers, hymn of their gladness and echo of their soft fragrance, the voice of the white carnations, the marjoram, and the thyme. They have, however, a whole gamut of sounds that we can distinguish, ranging from profound delight to menace, distress, and anger; they have the ode of the queen, the song of abundance, the psalms of grief, and, lastly, the long and mysterious war-cries the adolescent princesses send forth during the combats and massacres that precede the nuptial flight. May this be a fortuitous music that fails to attain their inward silence? In any event they seem not the least disturbed at the noises we make near the hive; but they regard these perhaps as not of their world, and possessed of no interest for them. It is possible that we on our side hear only a fractional part of the sounds that the bees produce, and that they have many harmonies to which our ears are not attuned. We soon shall see with what startling rapidity they are able to understand each other, and adopt concerted measures, when, for instance, the great honey thief, the huge sphinx atropos, the sinister butterfly that bears a death's head on its back, penetrates into the hive, humming its own strange note, which acts as a kind of irresistible incantation; the news spreads quickly from group to group, and from the guards at the threshold to the workers on the furthest combs, the whole population quivers.

All things show that it’s not the queen, but the spirit of the hive, that decides when to swarm. With our queen, it’s like many leaders among humans, who, although they seem to give orders, must actually follow commands that are more mysterious and inexplicable than what they tell their subordinates. Once the time is set, the spirit usually makes it known at dawn or possibly the night before, if not even two nights before; for hardly has the sun started to take in the first drops of dew when a strange stir, which the beekeeper rarely misinterprets, can be felt inside and around the buzzing city. Sometimes, it almost seems like there are signs of disagreement, hesitation, or retreat. It can even happen that for days on end, a strange, seemingly unwarranted emotion appears and disappears in this clear, golden swarm. Has a hidden cloud crossed the sky that the bees are watching, or is their intelligence grappling with a new regret? Is there a winged council debating whether to leave? We don’t know; just as we don’t know how the spirit informs the crowd of its decision. It may seem certain that the bees communicate with each other, but we don’t know if it’s like how humans do. It’s possible that their own sounds might be inaudible to them: the hum that reaches us, heavy with the scent of honey, the ecstatic whispers of the blissful summer days that the beekeeper loves, the joyful song of labor that rises and falls around the hive at the right time, and could almost be the chant of the eager flowers, their joyful hymn and echo of their soft fragrance, the voice of the white carnations, marjoram, and thyme. However, they have a full range of sounds that we can recognize, from deep joy to threats, distress, and anger; they have the ode of the queen, the song of abundance, the psalms of sorrow, and finally, the long and mysterious battle cries that the young princesses send out during the fights and chaos that occur before the nuptial flight. Could this be a chance music that doesn’t reach their internal stillness? In any case, they don’t seem the least bit bothered by the noises we make near the hive; they might view these sounds as outside their world and of no concern to them. It’s possible that we only hear a small part of the sounds the bees create, and they have many harmonies our ears can’t detect. We will soon see how quickly they can understand each other and take coordinated actions when, for instance, the great honey thief — the huge sphinx moth, the eerie butterfly with a death's head on its back — comes into the hive, humming its own strange tune, which acts like an irresistible spell; the news spreads quickly from one group to another, and from the guards at the entrance to the workers at the farthest combs, the entire population shudders.

{14}

{14}

It was for a long time believed that when these wise bees, generally so prudent, so far-sighted and economical, abandoned the treasures of their kingdom and flung themselves upon the uncertainties of life, they were yielding to a kind of irresistible folly, a mechanical impulse, a law of the species, a decree of nature, or to the force that for all creatures lies hidden in the revolution of time. It is our habit, in the case of the bees no less than our own, to regard as fatality all that we do not as yet understand. But now that the hive has surrendered two or three of its material secrets, we have discovered that this exodus is neither instinctive nor inevitable. It is not a blind emigration, but apparently the well-considered sacrifice of the present generation in favour of the generation to come. The bee-keeper has only to destroy in their cells the young queens that still are inert, and, at the same time, if nymphs and larvae abound, to enlarge the store-houses and dormitories of the nation, for this unprofitable tumult instantaneously to subside, for work to be at once resumed, and the flowers revisited; while the old queen, who now is essential again, with no successor to hope for, or perhaps to fear, will renounce for this year her desire for the light of the sun. Reassured as to the future of the activity that will soon spring into life, she will tranquilly resume her maternal labours, which consist in the laying of two or three thousand eggs a day, as she passes, in a methodical spiral, from cell to cell, omitting none, and never pausing to rest.

For a long time, people thought that when these wise bees, usually so cautious, forward-thinking, and resourceful, left the riches of their hive and launched themselves into the unknown, they were succumbing to some kind of unavoidable madness, a mechanical urge, a natural law, or the forces inherent in the passage of time. We tend to label as fate anything we don’t yet understand, whether it concerns bees or ourselves. However, now that we’ve uncovered a couple of material secrets of the hive, we’ve realized that this departure is neither instinctual nor inevitable. It’s not a mindless migration but seems to be a thoughtful sacrifice by the current generation for the benefit of those to come. The beekeeper just needs to eliminate the young queens that are still inactive in their cells, and, at the same time, if there are plenty of nymphs and larvae, increase the hive’s storage and sleeping areas. This chaotic disruption will instantly settle down, work will begin again, and the flowers will be revisited. Meanwhile, the old queen, who is now essential again, with no successor to look forward to or perhaps dread, will this year forgo her urge to bask in the sun. Comforted about the future activity that will soon be revived, she will calmly resume her motherly duties, which involve laying two or three thousand eggs a day as she methodically spirals from cell to cell, not skipping any, and never taking a break.

Where is the fatality here, save in the love of the race of to-day for the race of to-morrow? This fatality exists in the human species also, but its extent and power seem infinitely less. Among men it never gives rise to sacrifices as great, as unanimous, or as complete. What far-seeing fatality, taking the place of this one, do we ourselves obey? We know not; as we know not the being who watches us as we watch the bees.

Where is the tragedy here, except in today's love for the generations to come? This tragedy exists in humanity as well, but its scope and impact seem much smaller. Among people, it never leads to sacrifices as significant, as united, or as total. What distant fate, replacing this one, do we follow? We don’t know; just as we don’t know the being that observes us while we observe the bees.

But the hive that we have selected is disturbed in its history by no interference of man; and as the beautiful day advances with radiant and tranquil steps beneath the trees, its ardour, still bathed in dew, makes the appointed hour seem laggard. Over the whole surface of the golden corridors that divide the parallel walls the workers are busily making preparation for the journey. And each one will first of all burden herself with provision of honey sufficient for five or six days. From this honey that they bear within them they will distil, by a chemical process still unexplained, the wax required for the immediate construction of buildings. They will provide themselves also with a certain amount of propolis, a kind of resin with which they will seal all the crevices in the new dwelling, strengthen weak places, varnish the walls, and exclude the light; for the bees love to work in almost total obscurity, guiding themselves with their many-faceted eyes, or with their antennae perhaps, the seat, it would seem, of an unknown sense that fathoms and measures the darkness.

But the hive we've chosen hasn't been affected by human interference in its history; and as the beautiful day unfolds with bright and calm steps beneath the trees, its energy, still glistening with dew, makes the scheduled time feel slow. Across the entire surface of the golden paths that separate the parallel walls, the workers are hard at work preparing for the journey. Each one will first load herself down with enough honey to last five or six days. From this honey they carry inside them, they will produce, through a chemical process that remains a mystery, the wax needed for immediate construction of their homes. They will also gather a certain amount of propolis, a type of resin, to seal all the cracks in the new dwelling, reinforce weak spots, polish the walls, and block out light; because bees prefer to work in near-total darkness, navigating with their many-faceted eyes or perhaps using their antennae, which seem to house an unknown sense that detects and measures the dark.

{16}

{16}

They are not without prescience, therefore, of what is to befall them on this the most dangerous day of all their existence. Absorbed by the cares, the prodigious perils of this mighty adventure, they will have no time now to visit the gardens and meadows; and to-morrow, and after tomorrow, it may happen that rain may fall, or there may be wind; that their wings may be frozen or the flowers refuse to open. Famine and death would await them were it not for this foresight of theirs. None would come to their help, nor would they seek help of any. For one city knows not the other, and assistance never is given. And even though the bee-keeper deposit the hive, in which he has gathered the old queen and her attendant cluster of bees, by the side of the abode they have but this moment quitted, they would seem, be the disaster never so great that shall now have befallen them, to have wholly forgotten the peace and the happy activity that once they had known there, the abundant wealth and the safety that had then been their portion; and all, one by one, and down to the last of them, will perish of hunger and cold around their unfortunate queen rather than return to the home of their birth, whose sweet odour of plenty, the fragrance, indeed, of their own past assiduous labour, reaches them even in their distress.

They are not unaware of what awaits them on this most dangerous day of their lives. Consumed by the worries and tremendous risks of this grand adventure, they won't have time to visit the gardens and meadows. Tomorrow, and the day after, it could rain, or there might be wind; their wings could freeze or the flowers might not bloom. Hunger and death would be their fate without this foresight. No one would come to help them, nor would they ask for help from anyone. Each city is unaware of the others, and assistance is never offered. Even if the beekeeper places the hive, containing the old queen and her group of bees, next to the home they just left, they would seem to have completely forgotten the peace and joyful activity they once experienced there, along with the abundant resources and safety that were once theirs. One by one, down to the last, they will starve and freeze around their unfortunate queen rather than return to their birthplace, whose sweet scent of abundance—indeed, the fragrance of their own past hard work—reaches them even in their distress.

{17}

{17}

That is a thing, some will say, that men would not do,—a proof that the bee, notwithstanding the marvels of its organisation, still is lacking in intellect and veritable consciousness. Is this so certain? Other beings, surely, may possess an intellect that differs from ours, and produces different results, without therefore being inferior. And besides, are we, even in this little human parish of ours, such infallible judges of matters that pertain to the spirit? Can we so readily divine the thoughts that may govern the two or three people we may chance to see moving and talking behind a closed window, when their words do not reach us? Or let us suppose that an inhabitant of Venus or Mars were to contemplate us from the height of a mountain, and watch the little black specks that we form in space, as we come and go in the streets and squares of our towns. Would the mere sight of our movements, our buildings, machines, and canals, convey to him any precise idea of our morality, intellect, our manner of thinking, and loving, and hoping,—in a word, of our real and intimate self? All he could do, like ourselves when we gaze at the hive, would be to take note of some facts that seem very surprising; and from these facts to deduce conclusions probably no less erroneous, no less uncertain, than those that we choose to form concerning the bee.

Some might say that this is something men wouldn’t do—a sign that the bee, despite its incredible design, still lacks intellect and true consciousness. Is this really certain? Other creatures might have a different kind of intellect, leading to different outcomes, without being inferior. Besides, are we really such reliable judges of spiritual matters, even in our little human community? Can we easily guess the thoughts of the two or three people we might see moving and talking behind a closed window when we can't hear them? Or let’s imagine that someone from Venus or Mars were to observe us from a mountaintop, watching the tiny black figures we create in space as we go about in our streets and squares. Would just seeing our actions, buildings, machines, and canals give them any clear understanding of our morality, intellect, or how we think, love, and hope—in short, our true and inner selves? All they could do, like us when we look at a beehive, would be to note some surprising facts; from those facts, they might draw conclusions that are likely as wrong and uncertain as the ones we make about the bee.

This much at least is certain; our "little black specks" would not reveal the vast moral direction, the wonderful unity, that are so apparent in the hive. "Whither do they tend, and what is it they do?" he would ask, after years and centuries of patient watching. "What is the aim of their life, or its pivot? Do they obey some God? I can see nothing that governs their actions. The little things that one day they appear to collect and build up, the next they destroy and scatter. They come and they go, they meet and disperse, but one knows not what it is they seek. In numberless cases the spectacle they present is altogether inexplicable. There are some, for instance, who, as it were, seem scarcely to stir from their place. They are to be distinguished by their glossier coat, and often too by their more considerable bulk. They occupy buildings ten or twenty times larger than ordinary dwellings, and richer, and more ingeniously fashioned. Every day they spend many hours at their meals, which sometimes indeed are prolonged far into the night. They appear to be held in extraordinary honour by those who approach them; men come from the neighbouring houses, bringing provisions, and even from the depths of the country, laden with presents. One can only assume that these persons must be indispensable to the race, to which they render essential service, although our means of investigation have not yet enabled us to discover what the precise nature of this service may be. There are others, again, who are incessantly engaged in the most wearisome labour, whether it be in great sheds full of wheels that forever turn round and round, or close by the shipping, or in obscure hovels, or on small plots of earth that from sunrise to sunset they are constantly delving and digging. We are led to believe that this labour must be an offence, and punishable. For the persons guilty of it are housed in filthy, ruinous, squalid cabins. They are clothed in some colourless hide. So great does their ardour appear for this noxious, or at any rate useless activity, that they scarcely allow themselves time to eat or to sleep. In numbers they are to the others as a thousand to one. It is remarkable that the species should have been able to survive to this day under conditions so unfavourable to its development. It should be mentioned, however, that apart from this characteristic devotion to their wearisome toil, they appear inoffensive and docile; and satisfied with the leavings of those who evidently are the guardians, if not the saviours, of the race."

This much is clear: our "little black specks" won't show the vast moral direction and incredible unity that are so evident in the hive. "Where are they headed, and what do they do?" he would ask after years and centuries of patient observation. "What is the purpose of their lives, or what drives them? Do they follow some higher power? I can't see anything that guides their actions. The small things that one day they seem to collect and build, the next day they tear apart and scatter. They come and go, they meet and separate, but we don’t know what they’re really after. In countless instances, the scene they create is completely baffling. For example, some of them seem hardly to move from their spot. They're recognizable by their shinier appearance and often larger size. They inhabit structures ten or twenty times bigger than typical homes, and they’re more luxurious and intricately designed. Every day they spend hours eating, sometimes continuing deep into the night. They seem to be held in high regard by those around them; people come from neighboring houses bringing food, and even from far away, carrying gifts. One can only assume that these individuals are essential to the community, providing crucial service, although we haven’t yet figured out exactly what that service is. Then there are others who are tirelessly engaged in hard labor, whether in large buildings full of wheels that endlessly spin, near shipping docks, in dark shacks, or on small plots of land where they dig from sunrise to sunset. It seems like this work must be a punishment, as those doing it live in filthy, crumbling, miserable huts. They wear dull, colorless skin. Their enthusiasm for this unpleasant, or at least pointless, work is so intense that they barely take time to eat or sleep. In numbers, they outmatch the others by a thousand to one. It’s astonishing that the species has managed to survive under such harsh conditions. However, it should be noted that despite their dedication to this exhausting toil, they appear harmless and compliant, content with the scraps left by those who are clearly the guardians, if not the saviors, of the community.

{18}

{18}

Is it not strange that the hive, which we vaguely survey from the height of another world, should provide our first questioning glance with so sure and profound a reply? Must we not admire the manner in which the thought or the god that the bees obey is at once revealed by their edifices, wrought with such striking conviction, by their customs and laws, their political and economical organisation, their virtues, and even their cruelties? Nor is this god, though it be perhaps the only one to which man has as yet never offered serious worship, by any means the least reasonable or the least legitimate that we can conceive. The god of the bees is the future. When we, in our study of human history, endeavour to gauge the moral force or greatness of a people or race, we have but one standard of measurement—the dignity and permanence of their ideal, and the abnegation wherewith they pursue it. Have we often encountered an ideal more conformable to the desires of the universe, more widely manifest, more disinterested or sublime; have we often discovered an abnegation more complete and heroic?

Isn’t it odd that the hive, which we somewhat observe from a different perspective, gives us such clear and deep answers right away? Shouldn’t we appreciate how the thoughts or the guiding principle that the bees follow is clearly shown through their impressive structures, created with such strong belief, their customs and laws, their political and economic systems, their virtues, and even their harshness? This principle, although perhaps the only one that humanity has yet to take seriously, is by no means the least reasonable or legitimate one we can think of. The principle of the bees is the future. When we examine human history, trying to understand the moral strength or greatness of a people or race, we have just one way to measure—by the dignity and lasting nature of their ideals, and the selflessness with which they pursue them. Have we often found an ideal that aligns more closely with the universe’s desires, is more evident, more selfless, or more uplifting; have we often seen a selflessness that is more complete and heroic?

{19}

{19}

Strange little republic, that, for all its logic and gravity, its matured conviction and prudence, still falls victim to so vast and precarious a dream! Who shall tell us, O little people that are so profoundly in earnest, that have fed on the warmth and the light and on nature's purest, the soul of the flowers, wherein matter for once seems to smile, and put forth it? most wistful effort towards beauty and happiness,—who shall tell us what problems you have resolved, but we not yet, what certitudes you have acquired that we still have to conquer? And if you have truly resolved these problems, and acquired these certitudes, by the aid of some blind and primitive impulse and not through the intellect, then to what enigma, more insoluble still, are you not urging us on? Little city abounding in faith and mystery and hope, why do your myriad virgins consent to a task that no human slave has ever accepted? Another spring might be theirs, another summer, were they only a little less wasteful of strength, a little less self-forgetful in their ardour for toil; but at the magnificent moment when the flowers all cry to them, they seem to be stricken with the fatal ecstasy of work; and in less than five weeks they almost all perish, their wings broken, their bodies shrivelled and covered with wounds.

Strange little republic, that, for all its logic and seriousness, its strong beliefs and caution, still gets caught up in such a vast and unstable dream! Who will tell us, O little people who are so deeply sincere, who have thrived on warmth, light, and nature's purest essence, the soul of the flowers, where matter seems to smile for once and strive for beauty and happiness—who will tell us what problems you have solved that we haven't yet, what certainties you have gained that we still need to conquer? And if you have truly figured out these problems and gained these certainties through some blind, instinctive impulse rather than through thought, then what even greater puzzle are you pushing us toward? Little city filled with faith, mystery, and hope, why do your countless virgins agree to a task that no human slave has ever taken on? Another spring could be theirs, another summer, if only they were a little less reckless with their strength, a little less lost in their passion for labor; but at the moment when the flowers all call to them, they seem to be struck by the deadly ecstasy of work; and in less than five weeks, nearly all of them perish, their wings broken, their bodies shriveled and covered in wounds.

    "Tantus amor florum, et generandi gloria mellis!"
"Tantus amor florum, et generandi gloria mellis!"

cries Virgil in the fourth book of the Georgics, wherein he devotes himself to the bees, and hands down to us the charming errors of the ancients, who looked on nature with eyes still dazzled by the presence of imaginary gods.

cries Virgil in the fourth book of the Georgics, where he focuses on the bees and shares with us the delightful misunderstandings of the ancients, who viewed nature with eyes still blinded by the presence of imagined gods.

{20}

{20}

Why do they thus renounce sleep, the delights of honey and love, and the exquisite leisure enjoyed, for instance, by their winged brother, the butterfly? Why will they not live as he lives? It is not hunger that urges them on. Two or three flowers suffice for their nourishment, and in one hour they will visit two or three hundred, to collect a treasure whose sweetness they never will taste. Why all this toil and distress, and whence comes this mighty assurance? Is it so certain, then, that the new generation whereunto you offer your lives will merit the sacrifice; will be more beautiful, happier, will do something you have not done? Your aim is clear to us, clearer far than our own; you desire to live, as long as the world itself, in those that come after; but what can the aim be of this great aim; what the mission of this existence eternally renewed?

Why do they give up sleep, the joys of honey and love, and the relaxing life enjoyed, for example, by their flying brother, the butterfly? Why won't they live like he does? It's not hunger that pushes them. Two or three flowers are enough for their food, and in just one hour they can visit two or three hundred to gather a treasure whose sweetness they will never taste. Why all this struggle and distress, and where does this strong confidence come from? Is it really so certain that the new generation to which you dedicate your lives will deserve the sacrifice; will be more beautiful, happier, will accomplish something you haven't done? Your goal is clear to us, much clearer than our own; you want to live on, as long as the world exists, in those who come after; but what could be the purpose of this great aim; what is the mission of this constantly renewed existence?

And yet may it not be that these questions are idle, and we who are putting them to you mere childish dreamers, hedged round with error and doubt? And, indeed, had successive evolutions installed you all-powerful and supremely happy; had you gained the last heights, whence at length you ruled over nature's laws; nay, were you immortal goddesses, we still should be asking you what your desires might be, your ideas of progress; still wondering where you imagined that at last you would rest and declare your wishes fulfilled. We are so made that nothing contents us; that we can regard no single thing as having its aim self-contained, as simply existing, with no thought beyond existence. Has there been, to this day, one god out of all the multitude man has conceived, from the vulgarest to the most thoughtful, of whom it has not been required that he shall be active and stirring, that he shall create countless beings and things, and have myriad aims outside himself? And will the time ever come when we shall be resigned for a few hours tranquilly to represent in this world an interesting form of material activity; and then, our few hours over, to assume, without surprise and without regret, that other form which is the unconscious, the unknown, the slumbering, and the eternal?

And yet, could it be that these questions are pointless, and we who are asking them are just naive dreamers, surrounded by mistakes and uncertainty? And, in fact, if you were installed as all-powerful and completely happy through successive evolutions; if you had reached the ultimate heights from which you governed the laws of nature; indeed, if you were immortal goddesses, we would still be asking you what your desires are, what you consider progress; still wondering where you thought you would finally find rest and declare your wishes fulfilled. We are inherently built in a way that nothing satisfies us; we cannot see any single thing as having a purpose that is self-contained, merely existing without thoughts beyond that existence. Has there been, to this day, one god out of all the countless ones humans have imagined, from the most common to the most profound, who hasn't been expected to be active and dynamic, to create countless beings and things, and to have myriad purposes beyond himself? And will there ever be a time when we can peacefully spend a few hours just representing an interesting form of material activity in this world; and then, when those few hours are over, calmly accept, without surprise or regret, that other form which is the unconscious, the unknown, the slumbering, and the eternal?

{21}

{21}

But we are forgetting the hive wherein the swarming bees have begun to lose patience, the hive whose black and vibrating waves are bubbling and overflowing, like a brazen cup beneath an ardent sun. It is noon; and the heat so great that the assembled trees would seem almost to hold back their leaves, as a man holds his breath before something very tender but very grave. The bees give their honey and sweet-smelling wax to the man who attends them; but more precious gift still is their summoning him to the gladness of June, to the joy of the beautiful months; for events in which bees take part happen only when skies are pure, at the winsome hours of the year when flowers keep holiday. They are the soul of the summer, the clock whose dial records the moments of plenty; they are the untiring wing on which delicate perfumes float; the guide of the quivering light-ray, the song of the slumberous, languid air; and their flight is the token, the sure and melodious note, of all the myriad fragile joys that are born in the heat and dwell in the sunshine. They teach us to tune our ear to the softest, most intimate whisper of these good, natural hours. To him who has known them and loved them, a summer where there are no bees becomes as sad and as empty as one without flowers or birds.

But we are forgetting the hive where the swarming bees have started to lose patience, the hive whose dark, buzzing waves are bubbling and overflowing, like a shiny cup under a burning sun. It’s noon; and the heat is so intense that the trees seem to be holding back their leaves, like a person holding their breath before something very delicate yet serious. The bees give their honey and sweet-smelling wax to the person who tends to them; but an even more precious gift is their invitation to the joy of June, to the happiness of the beautiful months; for events involving bees only happen when the skies are clear, during the delightful times of the year when flowers take a break. They are the heart of summer, the clock marking the moments of abundance; they are the tireless wings carrying delicate fragrances; the guides of the shimmering light, the song of the drowsy, warm air; and their flight is the sign, the sure and melodic note, of all the countless fragile joys that emerge in the heat and thrive in the sunlight. They teach us to listen for the softest, most personal whispers of these good, natural hours. For someone who has experienced and cherished them, a summer without bees feels as sad and empty as one without flowers or birds.

{22}

{22}

The man who never before has beheld the swarm of a populous hive must regard this riotous, bewildering spectacle with some apprehension and diffidence. He will be almost afraid to draw near; he will wonder can these be the earnest, the peace-loving, hard-working bees whose movements he has hitherto followed? It was but a few moments before he had seen them troop in from all parts of the country, as pre-occupied, seemingly, as little housewives might be, with no thoughts beyond household cares. He had watched them stream into the hive, imperceptibly almost, out of breath, eager, exhausted, full of discreet agitation; and had seen the young amazons stationed at the gate salute them, as they passed by, with the slightest wave of antennae. And then, the inner court reached, they had hurriedly given their harvest of honey to the adolescent portresses always stationed within, exchanging with these at most the three or four probably indispensable words; or perhaps they would hasten themselves to the vast magazines that encircle the brood-cells, and deposit the two heavy baskets of pollen that depend from their thighs, thereupon at once going forth once more, without giving a thought to what might be passing in the royal palace, the work-rooms, or the dormitory where the nymphs lie asleep; without for one instant joining in the babel of the public place in front of the gate, where it is the wont of the cleaners, at time of great heat, to congregate and to gossip.

The man who has never seen the chaotic, swirling activity of a busy hive must look at this wild and confusing scene with some fear and hesitation. He might hesitate to approach; he will wonder if these are really the earnest, peace-loving, hard-working bees he has watched before. Just moments ago, he had seen them coming in from all over the area, looking as focused and busy as housewives concerned only with their home duties. He had observed them flowing into the hive, nearly breathless, eager, exhausted, and buzzing with quiet energy; and he had seen the young worker bees at the entrance greet them with a slight wave of their antennae as they went by. Once inside, they quickly handed over their honey to the young guards stationed inside, exchanging just a few essential words; or maybe they hurried to the large storage areas surrounding the brood cells to drop off the heavy loads of pollen hanging from their legs, then immediately went back out, giving no thought to what might be happening in the royal area, the working rooms, or the sleeping quarters of the nymphs; without for a moment joining in the chatter of the public area at the gate, where cleaners tend to gather and gossip during the hottest times.

{23}

{23}

To-day this is all changed. A certain number of workers, it is true, will peacefully go to the fields, as though nothing were happening; will come back, clean the hive, attend to the brood-cells, and hold altogether aloof from the general ecstasy. These are the ones that will not accompany the queen; they will remain to guard the old home, feed the nine or ten thousand eggs, the eighteen thousand larvae, the thirty-six thousand nymphs and seven or eight royal princesses, that to-day shall all be abandoned. Why they have been singled out for this austere duty, by what law, or by whom, it is not in our power to divine. To this mission of theirs they remain inflexibly, tranquilly faithful; and though I have many times tried the experiment of sprinkling a colouring matter over one of these resigned Cinderellas, that are moreover easily to be distinguished in the midst of the rejoicing crowds by their serious and somewhat ponderous gait, it is rarely indeed that I have found one of them in the delirious throng of the swarm.

Today, everything has changed. Some workers, it's true, will quietly head to the fields as if nothing is happening; they'll come back, clean the hive, care for the brood cells, and stay completely apart from the general excitement. These are the ones who won’t follow the queen; they will stay to protect the old home, feed the nine or ten thousand eggs, the eighteen thousand larvae, the thirty-six thousand nymphs, and seven or eight royal princesses that will all be left behind today. We cannot understand why they have been chosen for this strict duty, by what law, or by whom. They remain steadfast and calm in their mission; although I've often tried sprinkling some color on one of these resigned Cinderellas, who can be easily spotted among the joyful crowds because of their serious and somewhat heavy gait, it’s rare that I’ve found one of them in the ecstatic swarm.

And yet, the attraction must seem irresistible. It is the ecstasy of the perhaps unconscious sacrifice the god has ordained; it is the festival of honey, the triumph of the race, the victory of the future: the one day of joy, of forgetfulness and folly; the only Sunday known to the bees. It would appear to be also the solitary day upon which all eat their fill, and revel, to heart's content, in the delights of the treasure themselves have amassed. It is as though they were prisoners to whom freedom at last had been given, who had suddenly been led to a land of refreshment and plenty. They exult, they cannot contain the joy that is in them. They come and go aimlessly,—they whose every movement has always its precise and useful purpose—they depart and return, sally forth once again to see if the queen be ready, to excite their sisters, to beguile the tedium of waiting. They fly much higher than is their wont, and the leaves of the mighty trees round about all quiver responsive. They have left trouble behind, and care. They no longer are meddling and fierce, aggressive, suspicious, untamable, angry. Man—the unknown master whose sway they never acknowledge, who can subdue them only by conforming to their every law, to their habits of labour, and following step by step the path that is traced in their life by an intellect nothing can thwart or turn from its purpose, by a spirit whose aim is always the good of the morrow—on this day man can approach them, can divide the glittering curtain they form as they fly round and round in songful circles; he can take them up in his hand, and gather them as he would a bunch of grapes; for to-day, in their gladness, possessing nothing, but full of faith in the future, they will submit to everything and injure no one, provided only they be not separated from the queen who bears that future within her.

And yet, the pull must feel irresistible. It’s the thrill of the maybe unconscious sacrifice that the god has set in motion; it’s the celebration of sweetness, the triumph of the species, the win for what’s to come: the one day of happiness, forgetfulness, and silliness; the only Sunday known to the bees. It seems to be the one day when everyone gets to indulge and fully enjoy the treasures they've collected. It’s as if they’re prisoners who have finally gained their freedom, suddenly led to a land of comfort and abundance. They celebrate, unable to hold back their joy. They come and go without direction—those who usually move with such exact and practical purpose—they leave and return, venture out again to see if the queen is ready, to engage their sisters, to ease the boredom of waiting. They fly much higher than usual, and the leaves of the great trees around them tremble in response. They’ve left their troubles and worries behind. They’re no longer meddlesome and fierce, aggressive, suspicious, or angry. Humans—the mysterious masters whose control they never admit, who can only tame them by aligning with their every rule, their working habits, and following the steps laid out in their lives by an intellect nothing can derail or divert, by a spirit always aiming for the good of tomorrow—on this day, humans can approach them, can part the shimmering curtain they form as they dance around in joyful circles; they can scoop them up in their hands, gathering them like a bunch of grapes; because today, in their joy, having nothing but full faith in the future, they’ll accept everything and harm no one, as long as they’re not separated from the queen who embodies that future.

{25}

{25}

But the veritable signal has not yet been given. In the hive there is indescribable confusion; and a disorder whose meaning escapes us. At ordinary times each bee, once returned to her home, would appear to forget her possession of wings; and will pursue her active labours, making scarcely a movement, on that particular spot in the hive that her special duties assign. But to-day they all seem bewitched; they fly in dense circles round and round the polished walls like a living jelly stirred by an invisible hand. The temperature within rises rapidly,—to such a degree, at times, that the wax of the buildings will soften, and twist out of shape. The queen, who ordinarily never will stir from the centre of the comb, now rushes wildly, in breathless excitement, over the surface of the vehement crowd that turn and turn on themselves. Is she hastening their departure, or trying to delay it? Does she command, or haply implore? Does this prodigious emotion issue from her, or is she its victim? Such knowledge as we possess of the general psychology of the bee warrants the belief that the swarming always takes place against the old sovereign's will. For indeed the ascetic workers, her daughters, regard the queen above all as the organ of love, indispensable, certainly, and sacred, but in herself somewhat unconscious, and often of feeble mind. They treat her like a mother in her dotage. Their respect for her, their tenderness, is heroic and boundless. The purest honey, specially distilled and almost entirely assimilable, is reserved for her use alone. She has an escort that watches over her by day and by night, that facilitates her maternal duties and gets ready the cells wherein the eggs shall be laid; she has loving attendants who pet and caress her, feed her and clean her, and even absorb her excrement. Should the least accident befall her the news will spread quickly from group to group, and the whole population will rush to and fro in loud lamentation. Seize her, imprison her, take her away from the hive at a time when the bees shall have no hope of filling her place, owing, it may be, to her having left no predestined descendants, or to there being no larvae less than three days old (for a special nourishment is capable of transforming these into royal nymphs, such being the grand democratic principle of the hive, and a counterpoise to the prerogatives of maternal predestination), and then, her loss once known, after two or three hours, perhaps, for the city is vast; work will cease in almost every direction. The young will no longer be cared for; part of the inhabitants will wander in every direction, seeking their mother, in quest of whom others will sally forth from the hive; the workers engaged in constructing the comb will fall asunder and scatter, the foragers no longer will visit the flowers, the guard at the entrance will abandon their post; and foreign marauders, all the parasites of honey, forever on the watch for opportunities of plunder, will freely enter and leave without any one giving a thought to the defence of the treasure that has been so laboriously gathered. And poverty, little by little, will steal into the city; the population will dwindle; and the wretched inhabitants soon will perish of distress and despair, though every flower of summer burst into bloom before them.

But the real signal hasn’t been given yet. Inside the hive, there’s indescribable chaos and a disorder we can’t understand. Normally, each bee, once back at home, seems to forget she has wings and continues her busy work, hardly moving from the spot assigned to her duties in the hive. But today, they all seem enchanted; they fly in tight circles around the shiny walls like a living jelly stirred by an unseen hand. The temperature inside rises quickly—so much so that sometimes the wax of the structures softens and warps. The queen, who usually never leaves the center of the comb, is now frantically moving over the surface of the excited crowd that keeps spinning. Is she pushing them to leave, or trying to hold them back? Does she command them, or is she begging? Is this overwhelming emotion coming from her, or is she experiencing it? What we know about bee psychology suggests that the swarming happens against the old queen's wishes. In fact, the hardworking daughters see the queen primarily as the source of love—essential, of course, and revered, but somewhat oblivious and often not very bright. They treat her like a mother in her old age. Their respect and tenderness for her is heroic and endless. The purest honey, specially made and almost completely digestible, is reserved just for her. She has escorts watching over her day and night, helping with her maternal duties and preparing the cells for laying eggs; she has loving attendants who pamper and care for her, feed her, clean her, and even take care of her waste. If the slightest accident happens to her, news spreads quickly from one group to another, and the entire population rushes back and forth in loud mourning. If she is captured or taken away from the hive when the bees have no chance of replacing her—perhaps because she hasn’t left behind any destined offspring, or because there are no larvae less than three days old (as specific nourishment can turn these into royal nymphs, which is the grand democratic principle of the hive and a counterbalance to the privileges of maternal destiny)—then, once her absence is known, after two or three hours, perhaps, since the city is large, work will nearly come to a halt all around. The young will no longer be cared for; part of the bees will wander aimlessly looking for their mother, while others will venture out of the hive in search of her. The workers building the comb will scatter, the foragers will stop visiting the flowers, the guards at the entrance will abandon their posts; and intruders, all the pests that prey on honey, always on the lookout for a chance to steal, will roam freely in and out without anyone thinking to defend the treasure that was so hard-earned. Gradually, poverty will creep into the city; the population will shrink; and the unfortunate inhabitants will soon perish from distress and despair, even as every flower of summer blooms around them.

But let the queen be restored before her loss has become an accomplished, irremediable fact, before the bees have grown too profoundly demoralised,—for in this they resemble men: a prolonged regret, or misfortune, will impair their intellect and degrade their character,—let her be restored but a few hours later, and they will receive her with extraordinary, pathetic welcome. They will flock eagerly round her; excited groups will climb over each other in their anxiety to draw near; as she passes among them they will caress her with the long antennae that contain so many organs as yet unexplained; they will present her with honey, and escort her tumultuously back to the royal chamber. And order at once is restored, work resumed, from the central comb of the brood-cells to the furthest annex where the surplus honey is stored; the foragers go forth, in long black files, to return, in less than three minutes sometimes, laden with nectar and pollen; streets are swept, parasites and marauders killed or expelled; and the hive soon resounds with the gentle, monotonous cadence of the strange hymn of rejoicing, which is, it would seem, the hymn of the royal presence.

But let the queen be brought back before her absence becomes a permanent, irreversible situation, before the bees have become too deeply discouraged—because in this, they are like humans: a long-lasting regret or misfortune will weaken their minds and lower their spirits. If she returns just a few hours later, they will welcome her with an incredible, heartfelt reception. They will swarm around her eagerly; excited groups will jostle to get closer. As she moves among them, they will gently touch her with their long antennae, which have so many still-unknown functions; they will offer her honey and noisily escort her back to the royal chamber. And order is quickly restored, work resumes, from the central brood cells to the farthest storage area where the extra honey is kept; foragers head out in long, black lines, returning sometimes in less than three minutes, loaded with nectar and pollen; the streets are cleaned, pests and invaders are killed or driven away; and soon the hive fills with the soft, steady rhythm of the unique song of celebration, which seems to be the anthem of the queen's presence.

{26}

{26}

There are numberless instances of the absolute attachment and devotion that the workers display towards their queen. Should disaster befall the little republic; should the hive or the comb collapse, should man prove ignorant, or brutal; should they suffer from famine, from cold or disease, and perish by thousands, it will still be almost invariably found that the queen will be safe and alive, beneath the corpses of her faithful daughters. For they will protect her, help her to escape; their bodies will provide both rampart and shelter; for her will be the last drop of honey, the wholesomest food. And be the disaster never so great, the city of virgins will not lose heart so long as the queen be alive. Break their comb twenty times in succession, take twenty times from them their young and their food, you still shall never succeed in making them doubt of the future; and though they be starving, and their number so small that it scarcely suffices to shield their mother from the enemy's gaze, they will set about to reorganize the laws of the colony, and to provide for what is most pressing; they will distribute the work in accordance with the new necessities of this disastrous moment, and thereupon will immediately re-assume their labours with an ardour, a patience, a tenacity and intelligence not often to be found existing to such a degree in nature, true though it be that most of its creatures display more confidence and courage than man.

There are countless examples of the loyalty and dedication that the workers have for their queen. If a disaster strikes the little colony, whether the hive or comb collapses, or if humans act thoughtlessly or cruelly, and they face famine, cold, or disease, resulting in the loss of thousands, it will still usually be found that the queen is safe and alive beneath the bodies of her devoted daughters. They will protect her and help her escape; their bodies will serve as both a barrier and shelter; she will have the last drop of honey, the best food. No matter how great the disaster, the colony of virgins will remain strong as long as the queen is alive. Even if you break their comb twenty times in a row, take away their young and their food, you will never make them doubt the future; and although they may be starving, with numbers so small that they barely cover their mother from the enemy's view, they will start to reorganize the rules of the colony and address what is most urgent. They will assign tasks based on the new needs of this critical moment and will quickly return to their work with a passion, patience, tenacity, and intelligence rarely seen in nature, even though it’s true that most creatures show more confidence and bravery than humans.

But the presence of the queen is not even essential for their discouragement to vanish and their love to endure. It is enough that she should have left, at the moment of her death or departure, the very slenderest hope of descendants. "We have seen a colony," says Langstroth, one of the fathers of modern apiculture, "that had not bees sufficient to cover a comb of three inches square, and yet endeavoured to rear a queen. For two whole weeks did they cherish this hope; finally, when their number was reduced by one-half, their queen was born, but her wings were imperfect, and she was unable to fly. Impotent as she was, her bees did not treat her with the less respect. A week more, and there remained hardly a dozen bees; yet a few days, and the queen had vanished, leaving a few wretched, inconsolable insects upon the combs."

But the queen's presence isn't even necessary for their discouragement to fade and their love to last. It's enough for her to have left even the slightest hope of offspring at the time of her death or departure. "We’ve seen a colony," says Langstroth, one of the pioneers of modern beekeeping, "that didn’t have enough bees to cover a three-inch square comb, yet they tried to raise a queen. For two whole weeks, they held on to this hope; finally, when their numbers were reduced by half, their queen was born, but her wings were underdeveloped, and she couldn’t fly. Despite her inability, the bees treated her with utmost respect. A week later, there were hardly a dozen bees left; yet within a few days, the queen disappeared, leaving behind a few miserable, heartbroken insects on the combs."

There is another instance, and one that reveals most palpably the ultimate gesture of filial love and devotion. It arises from one of the extraordinary ordeals that our recent and tyrannical intervention inflicts on these hapless, unflinching heroines. I, in common with all amateur bee-keepers, have more than once had impregnated queens sent me from Italy; for the Italian species is more prolific, stronger, more active, and gentler than our own. It is the custom to forward them in small, perforated boxes. In these some food is placed, and the queen enclosed, together with a certain number of workers, selected as far as possible from among the oldest bees in the hive. (The age of the bee can be readily told by its body, which gradually becomes more polished, thinner, and almost bald; and more particularly by the wings, which hard work uses and tears.) It is their mission to feed the queen during the journey, to tend her and guard her. I would frequently find, when the box arrived, that nearly every one of the workers was dead. On one occasion, indeed, they had all perished of hunger; but in this instance as in all others the queen was alive, unharmed, and full of vigour; and the last of her companions had probably passed away in the act of presenting the last drop of honey she held in her sac to the queen, who was symbol of a life more precious, more vast than her own.

There’s another example that clearly shows the ultimate act of love and devotion from a child. It comes from one of the challenging situations that our recent and oppressive actions impose on these brave, steadfast heroines. Like many amateur beekeepers, I've had impregnated queens sent to me from Italy more than once, since the Italian species is more productive, stronger, more active, and gentler than our own. They are typically sent in small, perforated boxes. These boxes contain some food, and the queen is placed inside along with a number of workers, chosen as much as possible from the oldest bees in the hive. (You can easily tell the age of a bee by its body, which gradually becomes more polished, thinner, and almost bald; and especially by the wings, which become worn and torn from hard work.) Their job is to feed the queen during the journey, care for her, and protect her. I often found that by the time the box arrived, nearly all of the workers were dead. Once, they had all died of hunger; but in this case, as in all the others, the queen was alive, unharmed, and full of energy; and the last of her companions likely died while giving the final drop of honey from her sac to the queen, who represented a life more precious and expansive than her own.

{28}

{28}

This unwavering affection having come under the notice of man, he was able to turn to his own advantage the qualities to which it gives rise, or that it perhaps contains: the admirable political sense, the passion for work, the perseverance, magnanimity, and devotion to the future. It has allowed him, in the course of the last few years, to a certain extent to domesticate these intractable insects, though without their knowledge; for they yield to no foreign strength, and in their unconscious servitude obey only the laws of their own adoption. Man may believe, if he choose, that, possessing the queen, he holds in his hand the destiny and soul of the hive. In accordance with the manner in which he deals with her—as it were, plays with her—he can increase and hasten the swarm or restrict and retard it; he can unite or divide colonies, and direct the emigration of kingdoms. And yet it is none the less true that the queen is essentially merely a sort of living symbol, standing, as all symbols must, for a vaster although less perceptible principle; and this principle the apiarist will do well to take into account, if he would not expose himself to more than one unexpected reverse. For the bees are by no means deluded. The presence of the queen does not blind them to the existence of their veritable sovereign, immaterial and everlasting, which is no other than their fixed idea. Why inquire as to whether this idea be conscious or not? Such speculation can have value only if our anxiety be to determine whether we should more rightly admire the bees that have the idea, or nature that has planted it in them. Wherever it lodge, in the vast unknowable body or in the tiny ones that we see, it merits our deepest attention; nor may it be out of place here to observe that it is the habit we have of subordinating our wonder to accidents of origin or place, that so often causes us to lose the chance of deep admiration; which of all things in the world is the most helpful to us.

This unwavering affection has caught the attention of humans, allowing them to leverage the qualities it brings about or perhaps contains: impressive political insight, a strong work ethic, perseverance, generosity, and commitment to the future. In recent years, it has enabled people to partly tame these stubborn insects, albeit without their knowledge; they don't submit to any outside force, and in their unconscious servitude, they only follow the rules they’ve chosen for themselves. A person might believe that by having the queen, they control the fate and essence of the hive. Depending on how they interact with her—almost like playing with her—they can speed up or slow down the swarm, unite or split colonies, and steer the migration of kingdoms. However, it's still true that the queen is essentially just a living symbol, representing a larger, though less visible, principle; and the beekeeper should keep this principle in mind to avoid facing unexpected setbacks. The bees are not easily fooled. The presence of the queen doesn’t obscure their awareness of their true, intangible, and eternal sovereign, which is nothing other than their fixed idea. Why question whether this idea is conscious or not? Such thoughts are only valuable if we're anxious to decide whether we should admire the bees that hold this idea, or the nature that instilled it in them. Wherever it resides, in the vast unknown or in the tiny creatures we observe, it deserves our utmost attention. It might also be worth noting that our tendency to prioritize our amazement based on origin or location often leads us to miss out on profound admiration, which is the most beneficial thing in the world.

{29}

{29}

These conjectures may perhaps be regarded as exceedingly venturesome, and possibly also as unduly human. It may be urged that the bees, in all probability, have no idea of the kind; that their care for the future, love of the race, and many other feelings we choose to ascribe to them, are truly no more than forms assumed by the necessities of life, the fear of suffering or death, and the attraction of pleasure. Let it be so; look on it all as a figure of speech; it is a matter to which I attach no importance. The one thing certain here, as it is the one thing certain in all other cases, is that, under special circumstances, the bees will treat their queen in a special manner. The rest is all mystery, around which we only can weave more or less ingenious and pleasant conjecture. And yet, were we speaking of man in the manner wherein it were wise perhaps to speak of the bee, is there very much more we could say? He too yields only to necessity, the attraction of pleasure, and the fear of suffering; and what we call our intellect has the same origin and mission as what in animals we choose to term instinct. We do certain things, whose results we conceive to be known to us; other things happen, and we flatter ourselves that we are better equipped than animals can be to divine their cause; but, apart from the fact that this supposition rests on no very solid foundation, events of this nature are rare and infinitesimal, compared with the vast mass of others that elude comprehension; and all, the pettiest and the most sublime, the best known and the most inexplicable, the nearest and the most distant, come to pass in a night so profound that our blindness may well be almost as great as that we suppose in the bee.

These ideas might be seen as quite bold, and perhaps even a bit too human. One could argue that bees likely don’t have any notion of this kind; that their concern for the future, their care for their kind, and many other emotions we attribute to them are really just responses shaped by survival needs, the fear of pain or death, and the pursuit of pleasure. Let’s accept that; consider it just a figure of speech; it's not something I think is significant. The one thing that is certain here, as it is in all other situations, is that under specific circumstances, bees will treat their queen differently. The rest is all a mystery, around which we can only create more or less clever and enjoyable speculation. And yet, if we were to discuss humans the same way it's perhaps wise to speak about bees, is there really much more we could say? Humans too respond mainly to necessity, the lure of pleasure, and the fear of suffering; and what we call our intellect has the same roots and purpose as what we refer to as instinct in animals. We do certain things, believing we understand their outcomes; other things occur, and we convince ourselves that we’re better than animals at identifying their causes; but aside from the fact that this assumption isn't built on very solid ground, such instances are rare and extremely small compared to the vast number of events that we can’t comprehend; and all, from the most trivial to the most profound, the best understood to the most mysterious, the closest to the furthest, happen in a depth of night so profound that our ignorance may be almost as great as what we assume exists in bees.

{30}

{30}

"All must agree," remarks Buffon, who has a somewhat amusing prejudice against the bee,—"all must agree that these flies, individually considered, possess far less genius than the dog, the monkey, or the majority of animals; that they display far less docility, attachment, or sentiment; that they have, in a word, less qualities that relate to our own; and from that we may conclude that their apparent intelligence derives only from their assembled multitude; nor does this union even argue intelligence, for it is governed by no moral considerations, it being without their consent that they find themselves gathered together. This society, therefore, is no more than a physical assemblage ordained by nature, and independent either of knowledge, or reason, or aim. The mother-bee produces ten thousand individuals at a time, and in the same place; these ten thousand individuals, were they a thousand times stupider than I suppose them to be, would be compelled, for the mere purpose of existence, to contrive some form of arrangement; and, assuming that they had begun by injuring each other, they would, as each one possesses the same strength as its fellow, soon have ended by doing each other the least possible harm, or, in other words, by rendering assistance. They have the appearance of understanding each other, and of working for a common aim; and the observer, therefore, is apt to endow them with reasons and intellect that they truly are far from possessing. He will pretend to account for each action, show a reason behind every movement; and from thence the gradation is easy to proclaiming them marvels, or monsters, of innumerable ideas. Whereas the truth is that these ten thousand individuals, that have been produced simultaneously, that have lived together, and undergone metamorphosis at more or less the same time, cannot fail all to do the same thing, and are compelled, however slight the sentiment within them, to adopt common habits, to live in accord and union, to busy themselves with their dwelling, to return to it after their journeys, etc., etc. And on this foundation arise the architecture, the geometry, the order, the foresight, love of country,—in a word, the republic; all springing, as we have seen, from the admiration of the observer." There we have our bees explained in a very different fashion. And if it seem more natural at first, is it not for the very simple reason that it really explains almost nothing? I will not allude to the material errors this chapter contains; I will only ask whether the mere fact of the bees accepting a common existence, while doing each other the least possible harm, does not in itself argue a certain intelligence. And does not this intelligence appear the more remarkable to us as we more closely examine the fashion in which these "ten thousand individuals" avoid hurting each other, and end by giving assistance? And further, is this not the history of ourselves; and does not all that the angry old naturalist says apply equally to every one of our human societies? And yet once again: if the bee is indeed to be credited with none of the feelings or ideas that we have ascribed to it, shall we not very willingly shift the ground of our wonder? If we must not admire the bee, we will then admire nature; the moment must always come when admiration can be no longer denied us, nor shall there be loss to us through our having retreated, or waited.

"Everyone has to agree," says Buffon, who has a somewhat amusing bias against bees, "everyone has to agree that these insects, when looked at individually, have much less intelligence than dogs, monkeys, or most animals; they show far less compliance, attachment, or emotional depth; they have, in short, fewer qualities that relate to us. From this, we can conclude that their apparent intelligence comes solely from their large numbers; and this gathering doesn't even indicate intelligence, as it's not driven by moral considerations—they find themselves grouped together without their consent. This society is nothing more than a physical gathering dictated by nature, independent of knowledge, reasoning, or purpose. The queen bee produces ten thousand individuals at once, all in the same place; these ten thousand, even if they were a thousand times duller than I think they are, would have to create some form of organization simply to survive. And assuming they started off by harming each other, since each one has the same strength as its peers, they'd quickly learn to do each other the least harm possible, or in other words, start to help each other. They seem to understand each other and act toward a common goal; therefore, observers tend to attribute them with motives and intelligence they really lack. They'll try to explain each action, seeking a reason behind every movement; and from there, it's easy to declare them as wonders or monsters of countless ideas. However, the truth is that these ten thousand individuals, born at the same time, living together, and undergoing metamorphosis more or less simultaneously, cannot help but act together, and are forced, however minimal their feelings, to adopt shared habits, live in harmony, tend to their home, and return to it after their travels, etc., etc. And from this foundation arise architecture, geometry, order, foresight, patriotism—in a word, a community—all stemming, as we've seen, from the observer's admiration." There we have a very different explanation for our bees. If it seems more natural at first, isn't it simply because it really explains almost nothing? I won't mention the factual inaccuracies in this chapter; I only want to ask if the mere fact that bees accept a shared existence while causing each other the least possible harm doesn't suggest a certain level of intelligence. And doesn't this intelligence seem more impressive as we look closer at how these "ten thousand individuals" avoid hurting each other and end up helping each other? Furthermore, isn't this the story of ourselves; doesn't everything the frustrated old naturalist says apply equally to all of our human societies? And once more: if we conclude that bees really don't possess any of the emotions or thoughts we've attributed to them, shouldn't we readily shift our wonder to nature instead? If we don't admire the bee, then we will admire nature; there will always come a moment when admiration cannot be denied, nor will we lose anything by stepping back or being patient.

However these things may be, and without abandoning this conjecture of ours, that at least has the advantage of connecting in our mind certain actions that have evident connection in fact, it is certain that the bees have far less adoration for the queen herself than for the infinite future of the race that she represents. They are not sentimental; and should one of their number return from work so severely wounded as to be held incapable of further service, they will ruthlessly expel her from the hive. And yet it cannot be said that they are altogether incapable of a kind of personal attachment towards their mother. They will recognise her from among all. Even when she is old, crippled, and wretched, the sentinels at the door will never allow another queen to enter the hive, though she be young and fruitful. It is true that this is one of the fundamental principles of their polity, and never relaxed except at times of abundant honey, in favour of some foreign worker who shall be well laden with food.

However, regardless of how things are, and without giving up on our idea that at least connects certain actions in our minds, it’s clear that the bees have far less reverence for the queen herself than for the endless future of the species she symbolizes. They aren’t sentimental; if one of their own returns from foraging severely injured and unable to contribute, they will mercilessly kick her out of the hive. Yet, it can’t be said that they are completely unable to form a sort of personal bond with their queen. They can recognize her among all others. Even when she is old, damaged, and struggling, the guards at the entrance will never allow another queen to enter the hive, even if she is young and fertile. This is indeed one of the basic rules of their society, only relaxed during times of plenty, when they might allow a foreign worker loaded with food to come in.

When the queen has become completely sterile, the bees will rear a certain number of royal princesses to fill her place. But what becomes of the old sovereign? As to this we have no precise knowledge; but it has happened, at times, that apiarists have found a magnificent queen, in the flower of her age, on the central comb of the hive; and in some obscure corner, right at the back, the gaunt, decrepit "old mistress," as they call her in Normandy. In such cases it would seem that the bees have to exercise the greatest care to protect her from the hatred of the vigorous rival who longs for her death; for queen hates queen so fiercely that two who might happen to be under the same roof would immediately fly at each other. It would be pleasant to believe that the bees are thus providing their ancient sovereign with a humble shelter in a remote corner of the city, where she may end her days in peace. Here again we touch one of the thousand enigmas of the waxen city; and it is once more proved to us that the habits and the policy of the bees are by no means narrow, or rigidly predetermined; and that their actions have motives far more complex than we are inclined to suppose.

When the queen is completely sterile, the bees will raise a number of royal princesses to take her place. But what happens to the old queen? We don’t have exact information about this; however, there have been times when beekeepers found a beautiful queen, still in her prime, on the central comb of the hive, while in some hidden corner at the back, there is the thin, old "mistress," as they refer to her in Normandy. In such cases, it seems that the bees have to be very careful to protect her from the anger of the strong rival who wants her dead; after all, queens despise each other so intensely that if two were to share the same hive, they would immediately attack one another. It would be nice to think that the bees provide their former queen with a simple shelter in a quiet corner of the hive, allowing her to spend her last days in peace. Again, we encounter one of the many mysteries of the waxy city, and it further shows that the behaviors and strategies of bees are anything but narrow or strictly predetermined; their actions are motivated by much more complex reasons than we might assume.

{32}

{32}

But we are constantly tampering with what they must regard as immovable laws of nature; constantly placing the bees in a position that may be compared to that in which we should ourselves be placed were the laws of space and gravity, of light and heat, to be suddenly suppressed around us. What are the bees to do when we, by force or by fraud, introduce a second queen into the city? It is probable that, in a state of nature, thanks to the sentinels at the gate, such an event has never occurred since they first came into the world. But this prodigious conjuncture does not scatter their wits; they still contrive to reconcile the two principles that they appear to regard in the light of divine commands. The first is that of unique maternity, never infringed except in the case of sterility in the reigning queen, and even then only very exceptionally; the second is more curious still, and, although never transgressed, susceptible of what may almost be termed a Judaic evasion. It is the law that invests the person of a queen, whoever she be, with a sort of inviolability. It would be a simple matter for the bees to pierce the intruder with their myriad envenomed stings; she would die on the spot, and they would merely have to remove the corpse from the hive. But though this sting is always held ready to strike, though they make constant use of it in their fights among themselves, they will never draw it against a queen; nor will a queen ever draw hers on a man, an animal, or an ordinary bee. She will never unsheath her royal weapon—curved, in scimeter fashion, instead of being straight, like that of the ordinary bee—save only in the case of her doing battle with an equal: in other words, with a sister queen.

But we keep messing with what they see as the unchangeable laws of nature; constantly putting bees in a situation that’s similar to what we would face if the laws of space and gravity, light and heat, were suddenly removed around us. What are the bees supposed to do when we, either by force or trickery, introduce a second queen into their hive? In nature, it’s likely that, thanks to the sentinels at the entrance, this has never happened since they first appeared. Yet this huge event doesn’t confuse them; they still manage to balance the two principles that they seem to treat like divine commands. The first is that there should only be one mother; this rule is only broken in rare cases, usually when the reigning queen is sterile. The second principle is even more intriguing, and while it’s never violated, it has a kind of Jewish loophole. This rule gives any queen a sort of inviolability. It would be easy for the bees to attack the intruder with their countless stings; she would die instantly, and they would just need to remove her body from the hive. But even though they are always ready to strike and frequently use their stings in fights among themselves, they will never use it against a queen; nor will a queen ever use hers against a human, an animal, or a regular bee. She won’t draw her royal weapon—curved like a scimitar instead of straight like the worker bee’s—except when battling an equal: in other words, a sister queen.

No bee, it would seem, dare take on herself the horror of direct and bloody regicide. Whenever, therefore, the good order and prosperity of the republic appear to demand that a queen shall die, they endeavour to give to her death some semblance of natural decease, and by infinite subdivision of the crime, to render it almost anonymous.

No bee, it seems, is willing to face the horror of directly and violently killing their queen. So, whenever the stability and well-being of the colony require that a queen must die, they try to make her death look like a natural one, and by breaking the act into countless smaller parts, they make it almost untraceable.

They will, therefore, to use the picturesque expression of the apiarist, "ball" the queenly intruder; in other words, they will entirely surround her with their innumerable interlaced bodies. They will thus form a sort of living prison wherein the captive is unable to move; and in this prison they will keep her for twenty-four hours, if need be, till the victim die of suffocation or hunger.

They will, as the beekeeper puts it, "ball" the queen bee; in other words, they will completely surround her with their countless intertwined bodies. They will create a kind of living cage where she cannot move; and in this cage, they will keep her for twenty-four hours, if necessary, until she dies from suffocation or starvation.

But if, at this moment, the legitimate queen draw near, and, scenting a rival, appear disposed to attack her, the living walls of the prison will at once fly open; and the bees, forming a circle around the two enemies, will eagerly watch the strange duel that will ensue, though remaining strictly impartial, and taking no share in it. For it is written that against a mother the sting may be drawn by a mother alone; only she who bears in her flanks close on two million lives appears to possess the right with one blow to inflict close on two million deaths.

But if, right now, the rightful queen approaches and, sensing a rival, seems ready to fight her, the living walls of the prison will instantly swing open; and the bees, forming a circle around the two opponents, will eagerly observe the unusual duel that follows, while staying completely neutral and not getting involved. For it is said that only a mother can remove the sting when facing another mother; only the one who carries nearly two million lives within her can claim the right to deal nearly two million deaths with a single blow.

But if the combat last too long, without any result, if the circular weapons glide harmlessly over the heavy cuirasses, if one of the queens appear anxious to make her escape, then, be she the legitimate sovereign or be she the stranger, she will at once be seized and lodged in the living prison until such time as she manifest once more the desire to attack her foe. It is right to add, however, that the numerous experiments that have been made on this subject have almost invariably resulted in the victory of the reigning queen, owing perhaps to the extra courage and ardour she derives from the knowledge that she is at home, with her subjects around her, or to the fact that the bees, however impartial while the fight is in progress, may possibly display some favouritism in their manner of imprisoning the rivals; for their mother would seem scarcely to suffer from the confinement, whereas the stranger almost always emerges in an appreciably bruised and enfeebled condition.

But if the battle drags on for too long without any outcome, if the circular weapons slide harmlessly over the heavy armor, and if one of the queens seems eager to escape, then whether she is the rightful sovereign or an outsider, she will immediately be captured and put in a living cage until she shows the desire to fight her opponent again. It's worth mentioning, though, that the many trials on this matter have almost always ended with the reigning queen winning, possibly due to the extra courage and determination she gains from knowing she's at home, surrounded by her subjects, or because the bees, while fair during the fight, might show favoritism in how they imprison their rivals; their mother appears to endure confinement with little issue, while the outsider usually comes out noticeably bruised and weakened.

{33}

{33}

There is one simple experiment which proves the readiness with which the bees will recognise their queen, and the depth of the attachment they bear her. Remove her from the hive, and there will soon be manifest all the phenomena of anguish and distress that I have described in a preceding chapter. Replace her, a few hours later, and all her daughters will hasten towards her, offering honey. One section will form a lane, for her to pass through; others, with head bent low and abdomen high in the air, will describe before her great semicircles throbbing with sound; hymning, doubtless, the chant of welcome their rites dictate for moments of supreme happiness or solemn respect.

There’s a straightforward experiment that shows how quickly bees recognize their queen and how deeply connected they are to her. Remove her from the hive, and soon you’ll see all the signs of distress and anguish I mentioned in a previous chapter. Put her back a few hours later, and all her daughters will rush towards her, offering honey. One group will create a pathway for her to pass through; others, with their heads lowered and abdomens raised, will move in large semicircles around her, buzzing loudly, likely singing a welcome song as part of their rituals for moments of great joy or serious respect.

But let it not be imagined that a foreign queen may with impunity be substituted for the legitimate mother. The bees will at once detect the imposture; the intruder will be seized, and immediately enclosed in the terrible, tumultuous prison, whose obstinate walls will be relieved, as it were, till she dies; for in this particular instance it hardly ever occurs that the stranger emerges alive.

But let’s not think that a foreign queen can be easily swapped in for the rightful mother. The bees will quickly spot the deception; the intruder will be captured and immediately locked away in a chaotic, harsh prison, whose stubborn walls will keep her trapped until she dies; in this case, it almost never happens that the stranger comes out alive.

And here it is curious to note to what diplomacy and elaborate stratagem man is compelled to resort in order to delude these little sagacious insects, and bend them to his will. In their unswerving loyalty, they will accept the most unexpected events with touching courage, regarding them probably as some new and inevitable fatal caprice of nature. And, indeed, all this diplomacy notwithstanding, in the desperate confusion that may follow one of these hazardous expedients, it is on the admirable good sense of the bee that man always, and almost empirically, relies; on the inexhaustible treasure of their marvellous laws and customs, on their love of peace and order, their devotion to the public weal, and fidelity to the future; on the adroit strength, the earnest disinterestedness, of their character, and, above all, on the untiring devotion with which they fulfil their duty. But the enumeration of such procedures belongs rather to technical treatises on apiculture, and would take us too far.*

And it’s interesting to see how much diplomacy and elaborate tactics people use to trick these clever little insects and make them do what they want. In their unwavering loyalty, they accept the most unexpected situations with remarkable courage, likely viewing them as just another unavoidable whim of nature. And despite all this maneuvering, in the chaotic aftermath of one of these risky strategies, it’s the remarkable common sense of the bee that humans always rely on, almost instinctively; on their endless wealth of amazing laws and customs, their love for peace and order, their commitment to the greater good, and their loyalty to the future; on the clever strength and genuine selflessness of their character, and, most importantly, on the tireless dedication with which they perform their duties. But discussing all these methods belongs more to technical books on beekeeping, and would take us too far.*

     *The stranger queen is usually brought into the hive
     enclosed in a little cage, with iron wires, which is hung
     between two combs. The cage has a door made of wax and
     honey, which the workers, their anger over, proceed to gnaw,
     thus freeing the prisoner, whom they will often receive
     without any ill-will. Mr. Simmins, manager of the great
     apiary at Rottingdean, has recently discovered another
     method of introducing a queen, which, being extremely simple
     and almost invariably successful, bids fair to be generally
     adopted by apiarists who value their art. It is the
     behaviour of the queen that usually makes her introduction a
     matter of so great difficulty. She is almost distracted,
     flies to and fro, hides, and generally comports herself as
     an intruder, thus arousing the suspicions of the bees, which
     are soon confirmed by the workers' examination. Mr. Simmins
     at first completely isolates the queen he intends to
     introduce, and lets her fast for half an hour. He then lifts
     a corner of the inner cover of the orphaned hive, and places
     the strange queen on the top of one of the combs. Her former
     isolation having terrified her, she is delighted to find
     herself in the midst of the bees; and being famished she
     eagerly accepts the food they offer her. The workers,
     deceived by her assurance, do not examine her, but probably
     imagine that their old queen has returned, and welcome her
     joyfully. It would seem, therefore, that, contrary to the
     opinion of Huber and all other investigators, the bees are
     not capable of recognising their queen. In any event, the
     two explanations, which are both equally plausible—though
     the truth may lurk, perhaps, in a third, that is not yet
     known to us—only prove once again how complex and obscure
     is the psychology of the bee. And from this, as from all
     questions that deal with life, we can draw one conclusion
     only: that, till better obtain, curiosity still must rule in
     our heart.
*The new queen is usually brought into the hive in a small cage made of wire, which is hung between two combs. The cage has a door made of wax and honey, which the workers, after overcoming their initial anger, begin to chew open, freeing the queen who they often accept without any hostility. Mr. Simmins, the manager of the large apiary at Rottingdean, has recently found a different method for introducing a queen, which is very simple and almost always works, likely to be widely adopted by beekeepers who appreciate their craft. The behavior of the queen usually complicates her introduction. She becomes agitated, flies around, hides, and generally acts like a stranger, raising the bees' suspicions, which are then confirmed when the workers examine her. Mr. Simmins first isolates the queen he wants to introduce, allowing her to fast for half an hour. He then lifts a corner of the inner cover of the hive without a queen and places the new queen on top of one of the combs. Having been frightened by her previous isolation, she is thrilled to be surrounded by bees, and being hungry, she eagerly accepts their food. The workers, fooled by her confidence, do not examine her, likely believing that their old queen has returned, and they welcome her happily. Therefore, it seems that, contrary to what Huber and other researchers thought, bees are not able to recognize their queen. In any case, the two theories, both equally likely—though the truth might lie in a third explanation that we do not yet know—only highlight how complicated and puzzling bee psychology is. And from this, as with all questions about life, we can only draw one conclusion: that, until we have better answers, curiosity must continue to govern our hearts.*

{34}

{34}

As regards this personal affection of which we have spoken, there is one word more to be said. That such affection exists is certain, but it is certain also that its memory is exceedingly short-lived. Dare to replace in her kingdom a mother whose exile has lasted some days, and her indignant daughters will receive her in such a fashion as to compel you hastily to snatch her from the deadly imprisonment reserved for unknown queens. For the bees have had time to transform a dozen workers' habitations into royal cells, and the future of the race is no longer in danger. Their affection will increase, or dwindle, in the degree that the queen represents the future. Thus we often find, when a virgin queen is performing the perilous ceremony known as the "nuptial flight," of which I will speak later, that her subjects are so fearful of losing her that they will all accompany her on this tragic and distant quest of love. This they will never do, however, if they be provided with a fragment of comb containing brood-cells, whence they shall be able to rear other queens. Indeed, their affection even may turn into fury and hatred should their sovereign fail in her duty to that sort of abstract divinity that we should call future society, which the bees would appear to regard far more seriously than we. It happens, for instance, at times, that apiarists for various reasons will prevent the queen from joining a swarm by inserting a trellis into the hive; the nimble and slender workers will flit through it, unperceiving, but to the poor slave of love, heavier and more corpulent than her daughters, it offers an impassable barrier. The bees, when they find that the queen has not followed, will return to the hive, and scold the unfortunate prisoner, hustle and ill-treat her, accusing her of laziness, probably, or suspecting her of feeble mind. On their second departure, when they find that she still has not followed, her ill-faith becomes evident to them, and their attacks grow more serious. And finally, when they shall have gone forth once more, and still with the same result, they will almost always condemn her, as being irremediably faithless to her destiny and to the future of the race, and put her to death in the royal prison.

As for this personal affection we've talked about, there's one more thing to mention. It's clear that such affection exists, but it's also true that its memory is very short-lived. If you dare to bring back a mother who has been away for a few days, her upset daughters will greet her in a way that will make you quickly have to rescue her from the deadly confinement meant for unknown queens. The bees have had enough time to turn several workers' homes into royal cells, meaning the future of the colony is no longer at risk. Their affection will grow or fade depending on how much the queen symbolizes the future. We often see that when a virgin queen is going through the risky process known as the "nuptial flight," which I’ll explain later, her subjects are so afraid of losing her that they all accompany her on this tragic and distant search for love. However, they will never do this if they have a piece of comb with brood-cells, which allows them to raise other queens. In fact, their affection can even turn into rage and hatred if their queen fails to fulfill her duty to that abstract idea of future society, which the bees seem to take more seriously than we do. Sometimes, beekeepers, for various reasons, will prevent the queen from joining a swarm by putting a barrier into the hive; the quick and slender workers can slip through it without noticing, but for the poor queen, who is heavier and bulkier than her daughters, it presents an impassable obstacle. When the bees realize the queen hasn't followed them, they will return to the hive, scold the unfortunate captive, push her around, and mistreat her, accusing her of laziness or suspecting she’s not very bright. On their second leave, when they see she still hasn’t followed, they become convinced of her disloyalty, and their attacks become more intense. Finally, when they go out once more and get the same result, they will almost always condemn her for being hopelessly unfaithful to her purpose and to the future of the colony, and they will put her to death in the royal prison.

{35}

{35}

It is to the future, therefore, that the bees subordinate all things; and with a foresight, a harmonious co-operation, a skill in interpreting events and turning them to the best advantage, that must compel our heartiest admiration, particularly when we remember in how startling and supernatural a light our recent intervention must present itself to them. It may be said, perhaps, that in the last instance we have given, they place a very false construction upon the queen's inability to follow them. But would our powers of discernment be so very much subtler, if an intelligence of an order entirely different from our own, and served by a body so colossal that its movements were almost as imperceptible as those of a natural phenomenon, were to divert itself by laying traps of this kind for us? Has it not taken us thousands of years to invent a sufficiently plausible explanation for the thunderbolt? There is a certain feebleness that overwhelms every intellect the moment it emerges from its own sphere, and is brought face to face with events not of its own initiation. And, besides, it is quite possible that if this ordeal of the trellis were to obtain more regularly and generally among the bees, they would end by detecting the pitfall, and by taking steps to elude it. They have mastered the intricacies of the movable comb, of the sections that compel them to store their surplus honey in little boxes symmetrically piled; and in the case of the still more extraordinary innovation of foundation wax, where the cells are indicated only by a slender circumference of wax, they are able at once to grasp the advantages this new system presents; they most carefully extend the wax, and thus, without loss of time or labour, construct perfect cells. So long as the event that confronts them appear not a snare devised by some cunning and malicious god, the bees may be trusted always to discover the best, nay, the only human, solution. Let me cite an instance; an event, that, though occurring in nature, is still in itself wholly abnormal. I refer to the manner in which the bees will dispose of a mouse or a slug that may happen to have found its way into the hive. The intruder killed, they have to deal with the body, which will very soon poison their dwelling. If it be impossible for them to expel or dismember it, they will proceed methodically and hermetically to enclose it in a veritable sepulchre of propolis and wax, which will tower fantastically above the ordinary monuments of the city. In one of my hives last year I discovered three such tombs side by side, erected with party-walls, like the cells of the comb, so that no wax should be wasted. These tombs the prudent grave-diggers had raised over the remains of three snails that a child had introduced into the hive. As a rule, when dealing with snails, they will be content to seal up with wax the orifice of the shell. But in this case the shells were more or less cracked and broken; and they had considered it simpler, therefore, to bury the entire snail; and had further contrived, in order that circulation in the entrance-hall might not be impeded, a number of galleries exactly proportionate, not to their own girth, but to that of the males, which are almost twice as large as themselves. Does not this instance, and the one that follows, warrant our believing that they would in time discover the cause of the queen's inability to follow them through the trellis? They have a very nice sense of proportion, and of the space required for the movement of bodies. In the regions where the hideous death's-head sphinx, the acherontia atropos, abounds, they construct little pillars of wax at the entrance of the hive, so restricting the dimension as to prevent the passage of the nocturnal marauder's enormous abdomen.

It is to the future that the bees prioritize everything, and with a foresight, harmonious cooperation, and a skill in interpreting events to their advantage, they earn our utmost admiration, especially when we consider how startling and supernatural our recent intrusion must seem to them. It could be argued that, in the last example we provided, they misinterpret the queen's inability to follow them. But would our ability to understand be any sharper if an intelligence completely different from ours, using a body so massive that its movements were nearly invisible like a natural phenomenon, set traps for us? Hasn't it taken us thousands of years to come up with a believable explanation for lightning? Every intellect feels a certain weakness the moment it steps outside its own realm and confronts events it didn't initiate. Furthermore, it's quite possible that if this challenge of the trellis happened more regularly among the bees, they would ultimately recognize the trap and find ways to avoid it. They have figured out the complexities of the movable comb, where they have to store extra honey in neatly piled little boxes; and with the even more extraordinary innovation of foundation wax, where the cells are marked only by a thin ring of wax, they quickly grasp the benefits of this new system. They carefully extend the wax, thus constructing perfect cells without wasting time or effort. As long as the situation they face doesn't appear to be a snare set by some clever and malevolent force, the bees can always be trusted to find the best, or even the only, human-like solution. For example, consider how bees handle a mouse or a slug that finds its way into the hive. Once the intruder is dead, they need to deal with its body, which could soon contaminate their home. If they can't remove or rip it apart, they will methodically and tightly encase it in a real tomb made of propolis and wax, rising high above the regular monuments of the hive. Last year in one of my hives, I found three such tombs side by side, built with partition walls like the cells of the comb, ensuring no wax was wasted. These tombs had been created by the careful bees over the remains of three snails that a child had brought into the hive. Usually, when it comes to snails, they just seal the opening of the shell with wax. But in this case, since the shells were somewhat cracked and broken, they found it simpler to bury the entire snail and even planned several galleries at the entrance that were just the right size—not for themselves, but for the males, which are nearly twice their size, so that movement wasn’t hindered. Does this situation, along with the next one, not suggest that they would eventually figure out why the queen couldn't follow them through the trellis? They have a keen sense of proportion and the space needed for movement. In areas where the ugly death's-head sphinx, the acherontia atropos, is common, they build little pillars of wax at the entrance of the hive, carefully limiting the size to block the passage of the nocturnal pest's huge body.

{36}

{36}

But enough on this point; were I to cite every instance I should never have done. To return to the queen, whose position in the hive, and the part that she plays therein, we shall most fitly describe by declaring her to be the captive heart of the city, and the centre around which its intelligence revolves. Unique sovereign though she be, she is also the royal servant, the responsible delegate of love, and its captive custodian. Her people serve her and venerate her; but they never forget that it is not to her person that their homage is given, but to the mission that she fulfils, and the destiny she represents. It would not be easy for us to find a human republic whose scheme comprised more of the desires of our planet; or a democracy that offered an independence more perfect and rational, combined with a submission more logical and more complete. And nowhere, surely, should we discover more painful and absolute sacrifice. Let it not be imagined that I admire this sacrifice to the extent that I admire its results. It were evidently to be desired that these results might be obtained at the cost of less renouncement and suffering. But, the principle once accepted,—and this is needful, perhaps, in the scheme of our globe,—its organisation compels our wonder. Whatever the human truth on this point may be, life, in the hive, is not looked on as a series of more or less pleasant hours, whereof it is wise that those moments only should be soured and embittered that are essential for maintaining existence. The bees regard it as a great common duty, impartially distributed amongst them all, and tending towards a future that goes further and further back ever since the world began. And, for the sake of this future, each one renounces more than half of her rights and her joys. The queen bids farewell to freedom, the light of day, and the calyx of flowers; the workers give five or six years of their life, and shall never know love, or the joys of maternity. The queen's brain turns to pulp, that the reproductive organs may profit; in the workers these organs atrophy, to the benefit of their intelligence. Nor would it be fair to allege that the will plays no part in all these renouncements. We have seen that each worker's larva can be transformed into a queen if lodged and fed on the royal plan; and similarly could each royal larva be turned into worker if her food were changed and her cell reduced. These mysterious elections take place every day in the golden shade of the hive. It is not chance that controls them, but a wisdom whose deep loyalty, gravity, and unsleeping watchfulness man alone can betray: a wisdom that makes and unmakes, and keeps careful watch over all that happens within and without the city. If sudden flowers abound, or the queen grow old, or less fruitful; if population increase, and be pressed for room, you then shall find that the bees will proceed to rear royal cells. But these cells may be destroyed if the harvest fail, or the hive be enlarged. Often they will be retained so long as the young queen have not accomplished, or succeeded in, her marriage flight,—to be at once annihilated when she returns, trailing behind her, trophy-wise, the infallible sign of her impregnation. Who shall say where the wisdom resides that can thus balance present and future, and prefer what is not yet visible to that which already is seen? Where the anonymous prudence that selects and abandons, raises and lowers; that of so many workers makes so many queens, and of so many mothers can make a people of virgins? We have said elsewhere that it lodged in the "Spirit of the Hive," but where shall this spirit of the hive be looked for if not in the assembly of workers? To be convinced of its residence there, we need not perhaps have studied so closely the habits of this royal republic. It was enough to place under the microscope, as Dujardin, Brandt, Girard, Vogel, and other entomologists have done, the little uncouth and careworn head of the virgin worker side by side with the somewhat empty skull of the queen and the male's magnificent cranium, glistening with its twenty-six thousand eyes. Within this tiny head we should find the workings of the vastest and most magnificent brain of the hive: the most beautiful and complex, the most perfect, that, in another order and with a different organisation, is to be found in nature after that of man. Here again, as in every quarter where the scheme of the world is known to us, there where the brain is, are authority and victory, veritable strength and wisdom. And here again it is an almost invisible atom of this mysterious substance that organises and subjugates matter, and is able to create its own little triumphant and permanent place in the midst of the stupendous, inert forces of nothingness and death.*

But let's move on; if I were to mention every example, I’d never finish. Returning to the queen, we can best describe her role in the hive by calling her the heart of the colony and the center around which its intelligence revolves. Although she is a unique sovereign, she is also the royal servant, the responsible representative of love, and its devoted protector. Her subjects serve and respect her, but they never forget that their admiration is not just for her as a person but for the mission she fulfills and the destiny she embodies. It wouldn’t be easy to find a human republic that reflects more of the desires of our planet or a democracy that combines perfect and rational independence with a logical and complete submission. Nowhere, surely, would we find more intense and total sacrifice. Let’s not think that I admire this sacrifice as much as I admire its outcomes. It would obviously be better if those results could be achieved with less renunciation and suffering. However, once the principle is accepted—which is perhaps necessary in the grand scheme of our world—its organization compels our amazement. No matter what the human truth might be, life in the hive isn't seen as just a series of more or less pleasant hours, where it's sensible for only the moments essential for survival to be bitter. The bees view it as a great shared duty, evenly spread among them all, working toward a future that stretches back to the dawn of time. For this future, each one sacrifices more than half of her rights and joys. The queen gives up freedom, the light of day, and the beauty of flowers; the workers give up five or six years of their lives, and will never know love or the joys of motherhood. The queen's brain turns to mush so her reproductive organs can thrive; in the workers, these organs shrink to enhance their intelligence. It wouldn’t be fair to say that will plays no part in all this sacrifice. We’ve seen that each worker’s larva can turn into a queen if it’s housed and fed appropriately, just as each royal larva can become a worker if its food is altered and its cell modified. These mysterious selections happen daily in the golden light of the hive. It’s not chance that governs them, but a wisdom whose deep loyalty, seriousness, and constant vigilance can only be betrayed by humans: a wisdom that creates and destroys, and carefully observes everything happening both inside and outside the colony. If flowers suddenly bloom, or if the queen ages or becomes less fruitful; if the population grows and needs more space, you'll find that the bees will start to raise royal cells. But these cells can be destroyed if the harvest fails or if the hive is expanded. Often, they are kept as long as the young queen hasn’t finished or completed her mating flight—only to be destroyed when she returns, dragging behind her the undeniable sign of her fertilization. Who can say where the wisdom lies that balances the present and future, preferring what is not yet seen to what is already visible? Where is the anonymous prudence that selects and discards, raises and lowers; that from so many workers creates so many queens, and from so many mothers can produce a population of virgins? We have previously mentioned that it resides in the "Spirit of the Hive," but where is this spirit if not among the assembly of workers? To confirm its existence there, we probably don’t need to study this royal republic so closely. It’s enough to place under the microscope, as Dujardin, Brandt, Girard, Vogel, and other entomologists have done, the small rugged head of the virgin worker next to the somewhat empty skull of the queen and the male’s magnificent cranium, sparkling with its twenty-six thousand eyes. Within this tiny head, we would discover the workings of the largest and most magnificent brain of the hive: the most beautiful and complex, the most perfect, found in nature after that of humans, albeit in a different order and organization. Here again, as in every area where we understand the world’s design, where the brain is located, there lies authority and victory, true strength and wisdom. And once more, it's an almost invisible atom of this mysterious substance that organizes and subjugates the matter, capable of creating its own small, triumphant, and lasting space amidst the immense, inert forces of nothingness and death.

     *The brain of the bee, according to the calculation of
     Dujardin, constitutes the 1-174th part of the insect's
     weight, and that of the ant the 1-296th. On the other hand
     the peduncular parts, whose development usually keeps pace
     with the triumphs the intellect achieves over instinct, are
     somewhat less important in the bee than in the ant. It would
     seem to result from these estimates—which are of course
     hypothetical, and deal with a matter that is exceedingly
     obscure—that the intellectual value of the bee and the ant
     must be more or less equal.
     *The brain of the bee, according to Dujardin's calculations, makes up 1/174 of the insect's weight, while the ant's brain is 1/296 of its weight. On the other hand, the parts of the brain that usually develop alongside the successes of intellect over instinct are somewhat less significant in bees than in ants. These estimates—which are, of course, hypothetical and address a very unclear topic—suggest that the intellectual capacities of bees and ants must be roughly equal.

{37}

{37}

And now to return to our swarming hive, where the bees have already given the signal for departure, without waiting for these reflections of ours to come to an end. At the moment this signal is given, it is as though one sudden mad impulse had simultaneously flung open wide every single gate in the city; and the black throng issues, or rather pours forth in a double, or treble, or quadruple jet, as the number of exits may be; in a tense, direct, vibrating, uninterrupted stream that at once dissolves and melts into space, where the myriad transparent, furious wings weave a tissue throbbing with sound. And this for some moments will quiver right over the hive, with prodigious rustle of gossamer silks that countless electrified hands might be ceaselessly rending and stitching; it floats undulating, it trembles and flutters like a veil of gladness invisible fingers support in the sky, and wave to and fro, from the flowers to the blue, expecting sublime advent or departure. And at last one angle declines another is lifted; the radiant mantle unites its four sunlit corners; and like the wonderful carpet the fairy-tale speaks of, that flits across space to obey its master's command, it steers its straight course, bending forward a little as though to hide in its folds the sacred presence of the future, towards the willow, the pear-tree, or lime whereon the queen has alighted; and round her each rhythmical wave comes to rest, as though on a nail of gold, and suspends its fabric of pearls and of luminous wings.

And now, back to our busy hive, where the bees have already signaled their departure, not waiting for our thoughts to wrap up. The moment this signal goes off, it’s like a sudden wild impulse has flung wide open every single gate in the city; and the crowd spills out, or rather rushes out in a double, triple, or quadruple stream, depending on how many exits there are; in a tense, direct, vibrating, uninterrupted flow that immediately dissolves into the space around it, where countless transparent, furious wings create a sound-filled tapestry. For a few moments, this buzzing reverberates right over the hive, with an amazing rustle of delicate silks that countless electrified hands might be endlessly tearing and weaving; it floats and sways, quivers and flaps like a veil of joy that invisible fingers hold up in the sky, waving back and forth, from the flowers to the blue, anticipating a glorious arrival or departure. Finally, one corner dips while another rises; the radiant covering brings together its four sunlit edges; and like the magical carpet from the fairy tale that glides through the air to obey its master’s command, it moves straight ahead, leaning forward slightly as if to hide within its folds the sacred presence of what’s to come, towards the willow, the pear tree, or the lime where the queen has landed; and around her, each rhythmic wave settles, as if resting on a golden nail, suspending its fabric of pearls and luminous wings.

And then there is silence once more; and, in an instant, this mighty tumult, this awful curtain apparently laden with unspeakable menace and anger, this bewildering golden hail that streamed upon every object near—all these become merely a great, inoffensive, peaceful cluster of bees, composed of thousands of little motionless groups, that patiently wait, as they hang from the branch of a tree, for the scouts to return who have gone in search of a place of shelter.

And then there’s silence again; and, in a flash, this overwhelming noise, this terrifying backdrop seemingly filled with unexplainable threat and fury, this confusing golden rain that fell on everything nearby—all of this transforms into just a large, harmless, peaceful swarm of bees, made up of thousands of little still groups, that patiently hang from a tree branch, waiting for the scouts to come back who went to look for a place to take cover.

{38}

{38}

This is the first stage of what is known as the "primary swarm" at whose head the old queen is always to be found. They will settle as a rule on the shrub or the tree that is nearest the hive; for the queen, besides being weighed down by her eggs, has dwelt in constant darkness ever since her marriage-flight, or the swarm of the previous year; and is naturally reluctant to venture far into space, having indeed almost forgotten the use of her wings.

This is the first stage of what’s called the "primary swarm," led by the old queen. They usually settle on the nearest shrub or tree to the hive; the queen, weighed down by her eggs, has been in constant darkness since her wedding flight or the swarm from the previous year, and is naturally hesitant to go too far, having nearly forgotten how to use her wings.

The bee-keeper waits till the mass be completely gathered together; then, having covered his head with a large straw hat (for the most inoffensive bee will conceive itself caught in a trap if entangled in hair, and will infallibly use its sting), but, if he be experienced, wearing neither mask nor veil; having taken the precaution only of plunging his arms in cold water up to the elbow, he proceeds to gather the swarm by vigorously shaking the bough from which the bees depend over an inverted hive. Into this hive the cluster will fall as heavily as an over-ripe fruit. Or, if the branch be too stout, he can plunge a spoon into the mass; and deposit where he will the living spoonfuls, as though he were ladling out corn. He need have no fear of the bees that are buzzing around him, settling on his face and hands. The air resounds with their song of ecstasy, which is different far from their chant of anger. He need have no fear that the swarm will divide, or grow fierce, will scatter, or try to escape. This is a day, I repeat, when a spirit of holiday would seem to animate these mysterious workers, a spirit of confidence, that apparently nothing can trouble. They have detached themselves from the wealth they had to defend, and they no longer recognise their enemies. They become inoffensive because of their happiness, though why they are happy we know not, except it be because they are obeying their law. A moment of such blind happiness is accorded by nature at times to every living thing, when she seeks to accomplish her end. Nor need we feel any surprise that here the bees are her dupes; we ourselves, who have studied her movements these centuries past, and with a brain more perfect than that of the bee, we too are her dupes, and know not even yet whether she be benevolent or indifferent, or only basely cruel.

The beekeeper waits until the swarm is fully gathered; then, putting on a large straw hat (since even the gentlest bee might think it's trapped if it gets caught in hair and will definitely sting), he confidently goes without a mask or veil if he’s experienced. He only takes the precaution of soaking his arms in cold water up to his elbows, and then he gathers the swarm by shaking the branch from which the bees hang over an upside-down hive. The cluster will fall into the hive like overripe fruit. If the branch is too thick, he can use a spoon to scoop out portions of the swarm and drop them where he wants, like serving corn. He has no reason to worry about the bees buzzing around him, landing on his face and hands. The air is filled with their joyful sounds, which are completely different from their angry buzz. He doesn’t have to worry about the swarm splitting, becoming aggressive, scattering, or trying to escape. This is a day, I repeat, when a festive spirit seems to energize these mysterious creatures, bringing a sense of calm that appears untouchable. They have detached from the treasures they usually protect and no longer see their enemies. They become harmless because they’re happy, though we don’t know why they’re happy—maybe it’s simply because they’re following their instinct. Nature sometimes grants all living beings moments of blind joy, as she strives to fulfill her purpose. It’s no surprise that here the bees are her unwitting accomplices; we, who have studied her ways for centuries and boast a better brain than the bee's, are also her unwitting victims, still unsure whether she is kind, indifferent, or simply cruel.

There where the queen has alighted the swarm will remain; and had she descended alone into the hive, the bees would have followed, in long black files, as soon as intelligence had reached them of the maternal retreat. The majority will hasten to her, with utmost eagerness; but large numbers will pause for an instant on the threshold of the unknown abode, and there will describe the circles of solemn rejoicing with which it is their habit to celebrate happy events. "They are beating to arms," say the French peasants. And then the strange home will at once be accepted, and its remotest corners explored; its position in the apiary, its form, its colour, are grasped and retained in these thousands of prudent and faithful little memories. Careful note is taken of the neighbouring landmarks, the new city is founded, and its place established in the mind and the heart of all its inhabitants; the walls resound with the love-hymn of the royal presence, and work begins.

There where the queen has landed, the swarm will stay; and if she had come down alone into the hive, the bees would have followed in long black lines as soon as they heard about her arrival. Most will rush to her with great eagerness; but many will pause for a moment at the entrance of the unfamiliar space, and there they will perform the circles of solemn celebration that they typically do to mark joyful occasions. "They are beating to arms," say the French farmers. Then, the unfamiliar home will be accepted immediately, and its farthest corners will be explored; its location in the apiary, its shape, its color, are all noted and remembered by these thousands of careful and loyal little minds. They take careful note of the nearby landmarks, a new city is established, and its place is secured in the thoughts and hearts of all its residents; the walls vibrate with the joyful song of the royal presence, and work commences.

{39}

{39}

But if the swarm be not gathered by man, its history will not end here. It will remain suspended on the branch until the return of the workers, who, acting as scouts, winged quartermasters, as it were, have at the very first moment of swarming sallied forth in all directions in search of a lodging. They return one by one, and render account of their mission; and as it is manifestly impossible for us to fathom the thought of the bees, we can only interpret in human fashion the spectacle that they present. We may regard it as probable, therefore, that most careful attention is given to the reports of the various scouts. One of them it may be, dwells on the advantage of some hollow tree it has seen; another is in favour of a crevice in a ruinous wall, of a cavity in a grotto, or an abandoned burrow. The assembly often will pause and deliberate until the following morning. Then at last the choice is made, and approved by all. At a given moment the entire mass stirs, disunites, sets in motion, and then, in one sustained and impetuous flight, that this time knows no obstacle, it will steer its straight course, over hedges and cornfields, over haystack and lake, over river and village, to its determined and always distant goal. It is rarely indeed that this second stage can be followed by man. The swarm returns to nature; and we lose the track of its destiny.

But if the swarm isn't gathered by a person, its story won't end here. It will stay resting on the branch until the workers come back, who, acting like scouts or winged quartermasters, immediately fly off in all directions searching for a new home. They return one by one to report back on their findings; and since it's clearly impossible for us to understand what the bees are thinking, we can only interpret what we see in human terms. It's likely that they pay close attention to the reports from the various scouts. One of them might highlight the benefits of a certain hollow tree it spotted; another might advocate for a crack in a crumbling wall, a void in a cave, or an old burrow. The group often stops to discuss until the next morning. Then, finally, a decision is made and approved by everyone. At a certain moment, the whole swarm stirs, breaks apart, and sets off, taking off in one smooth and forceful flight that encounters no obstacles this time, flying straight over hedges and fields, past haystacks and lakes, across rivers and villages, towards their chosen yet always distant destination. It’s very rare for humans to be able to follow this second stage. The swarm returns to nature, and we lose track of what happens next.





III — THE FOUNDATION OF THE CITY

{40}

LET us rather consider the proceedings of the swarm the apiarist shall have gathered into his hive. And first of all let us not be forgetful of the sacrifice these fifty thousand virgins have made, who, as Ronsard sings,—

LET us instead think about the actions of the swarm that the beekeeper has gathered into his hive. And first of all, let us not forget the sacrifice these fifty thousand virgins have made, who, as Ronsard sings,—

    "In a little body bear so true a heart,—"
"In a small body beats such a true heart,"

and let us, yet once again, admire the courage with which they begin life anew in the desert whereon they have fallen. They have forgotten the splendour and wealth of their native city, where existence had been so admirably organised and certain, where the essence of every flower reminiscent of sunshine had enabled them to smile at the menace of winter. There, asleep in the depths of their cradles, they have left thousands and thousands of daughters, whom they never again will see. They have abandoned, not only the enormous treasure of pollen and propolis they had gathered together, but also more than 120 pounds of honey; a quantity representing more than twelve times the entire weight of the population, and close on 600,000 times that of the individual bee. To man this would mean 42,000 tons of provisions, a vast fleet of mighty ships laden with nourishment more precious than any known to us; for to the bee honey is a kind of liquid life, a species of chyle that is at once assimilated, with almost no waste whatever.

and let us once again admire the courage with which they start life anew in the desert where they have landed. They have forgotten the beauty and wealth of their home city, where life was so well organized and certain, where the essence of every flower, reminiscent of sunshine, allowed them to smile at the threat of winter. There, asleep in the depths of their cradles, they have left thousands and thousands of daughters, whom they will never see again. They have abandoned not only the huge treasure of pollen and propolis they had gathered but also more than 120 pounds of honey; a quantity that is more than twelve times the total weight of the population, and nearly 600,000 times that of an individual bee. To a human, this would mean 42,000 tons of provisions, a vast fleet of powerful ships loaded with nourishment more precious than anything known to us; for to the bee, honey is a type of liquid life, a form of chyle that is almost entirely used with very little waste.

Here, in the new abode, there is nothing; not a drop of honey, not a morsel of wax; neither guiding-mark nor point of support. There is only the dreary emptiness of an enormous monument that has nothing but sides and roof. Within the smooth and rounded walls there only is darkness; and the enormous arch above rears itself over nothingness. But useless regrets are unknown to the bee; or in any event it does not allow them to hinder its action. Far from being cast down by an ordeal before which every other courage would succumb, it displays greater ardour than ever. Scarcely has the hive been set in its place, or the disorder allayed that ensued on the bees' tumultuous fall, when we behold the clearest, most unexpected division in that entangled mass. The greater portion, forming in solid columns, like an army obeying a definite order, will proceed to climb the vertical walls of the hive. The cupola reached, the first to arrive will cling with the claws of their anterior legs, those that follow hang on to the first, and so in succession, until long chains have been formed that serve as a bridge to the crowd that rises and rises. And, by slow degrees, these chains, as their number increases, supporting each other and incessantly interweaving, become garlands which, in their turn, the uninterrupted and constant ascension transforms into a thick, triangular curtain, or rather a kind of compact and inverted cone, whose apex attains the summit of the cupola, while its widening base descends to a half, or two-thirds, of the entire height of the hive. And then, the last bee that an inward voice has impelled to form part of this group having added itself to the curtain suspended in darkness, the ascension ceases; all movement slowly dies away in the dome; and, for long hours, this strange inverted cone will wait, in a silence that almost seems awful, in a stillness one might regard as religious, for the mystery of wax to appear.

Here, in the new home, there’s nothing; not a drop of honey, not a piece of wax; no guiding marks or support. There’s just the dull emptiness of a huge structure that only has walls and a roof. Inside the smooth, curved walls, there’s only darkness; and the massive arch above looms over nothingness. But useless regrets are foreign to the bee; or at least it doesn’t let them stop its work. Instead of being discouraged by a challenge that would break the spirit of others, it shows even more determination than before. No sooner has the hive been set in place, or the chaos from the bees’ chaotic fall settled, than we see a clear, unexpected division in that tangled mass. Most of the bees, forming solid columns, like an army following a clear command, begin to climb the hive’s vertical walls. Once they reach the dome, the first ones cling on with their front legs, while those that follow hang onto the first, and so on, until long chains are created that serve as a bridge for the crowd that keeps ascending. Gradually, these chains, as they multiply, supporting each other and constantly intertwining, become garlands which, through their continuous and steady rise, transform into a thick, triangular curtain, or rather a solid, inverted cone, whose peak touches the top of the dome while its widening base descends to halfway, or two-thirds, of the hive’s total height. And then, once the last bee, urged by an inner voice, joins this group hanging in the darkness, the ascent stops; all movement slowly fades away in the dome; and for many hours, this strange inverted cone will wait, in a silence that almost feels eerie, in a stillness that could be considered sacred, for the mystery of wax to emerge.

In the meantime the rest of the bees—those, that is, that remained down below in the hive—have shown not the slightest desire to join the others aloft, and pay no heed to the formation of the marvellous curtain on whose folds a magical gift is soon to descend. They are satisfied to examine the edifice and undertake the necessary labours. They carefully sweep the floor, and remove, one by one, twigs, grains of sand, and dead leaves; for the bees are almost fanatically cleanly, and when, in the depths of winter, severe frosts retard too long what apiarists term their "flight of cleanliness," rather than sully the hive they will perish by thousands of a terrible bowel-disease. The males alone are incurably careless, and will impudently bestrew the surface of the comb with their droppings, which the workers are obliged to sweep as they hasten behind them.

In the meantime, the rest of the bees—those that stayed down in the hive—have shown no interest in joining the others up above and ignore the formation of the amazing curtain from which a magical gift will soon fall. They are content to check out the structure and do the necessary work. They carefully clean the floor, removing twigs, grains of sand, and dead leaves one by one; because bees are almost obsessively clean, and when, in the depths of winter, harsh frosts delay what beekeepers call their "cleaning flight" for too long, they would rather die by the thousands from a terrible gut disease than dirty their hive. Only the males are incurably lazy and will shamelessly scatter their droppings across the surface of the comb, which the workers have to clean up as they rush behind them.

The cleaning over, the bees of the profane group that form no part of the cone suspended in a sort of ecstasy, set to work minutely to survey the lower circumference of the common dwelling. Every crevice is passed in review, and filled, covered over with propolis; and the varnishing of the walls is begun, from top to bottom. Guards are appointed to take their stand at the gate; and very soon a certain number of workers will go to the fields and return with their burden of pollen.

The cleaning finished, the bees from the ordinary group that aren’t part of the cone, almost in a trance, started meticulously inspecting the lower edge of their shared home. Every nook and cranny was checked and sealed with propolis, and they began varnishing the walls from top to bottom. Guards were assigned to stand at the entrance, and soon, a group of workers would head out to the fields and come back loaded with pollen.

{41}

{41}

Before raising the folds of the mysterious curtain beneath whose shelter are laid the veritable foundations of the home, let us endeavour to form some conception of the sureness of vision, the accurate calculation and industry our little people of emigrants will be called to display in order to adapt this new dwelling to their requirements. In the void round about them they must lay the plans for their city, and logically mark out the site of the edifices that must be erected as economically and quickly as possible, for the queen, eager to lay, already is scattering her eggs on the ground. And in this labyrinth of complicated buildings, so far existing only in imagination, laws of ventilation must be considered, of stability, solidity; resistance of the wax must not be lost sight of, or the nature of the food to be stored, or the habits of the queen; ready access must be contrived to all parts, and careful attention be given to the distribution of stores and houses, passages and streets,—this however is in some measure pre-established, the plan already arrived at being organically the best,—and there are countless problems besides, whose enumeration would take too long.

Before we lift the curtain that hides the true foundations of the home, let’s try to understand the clarity of vision, precise planning, and hard work that our little group of emigrants will need to adapt this new dwelling to their needs. In the empty space around them, they must create a blueprint for their city, logically outline where the buildings should go, and do it as efficiently and quickly as possible, since the queen is already eager to lay eggs on the ground. In this maze of complex structures, which exist only in their imagination for now, they need to think about ventilation, stability, and strength; they can't overlook the wax’s durability, the type of food to be stored, or the queen's habits. They have to design easy access to all areas and carefully plan the layout of stores and homes, paths and streets — this is somewhat pre-defined, and the plan they have is already the best suited for their needs — and there are countless other issues to consider that would take too long to list.

Now, the form of the hive that man offers to the bee knows infinite variety, from the hollow tree or earthenware vessel still obtaining in Asia and Africa, and the familiar bell-shaped constructions of straw which we find in our farmers' kitchen-gardens or beneath their windows, lost beneath masses of sunflowers, phlox, and hollyhock, to what may really be termed the factory of the model apiarist of today. An edifice, this, that can contain more than three hundred pounds of honey, in three or four stories of superposed combs enclosed in a frame which permits of their being removed and handled, of the harvest being extracted through centrifugal force by means of a turbine, and of their being then restored to their place like a book in a well-ordered library.

Now, the types of hives that people provide for bees come in countless forms, from the hollow trees or clay pots still used in Asia and Africa, to the familiar bell-shaped straw structures found in our farmers' gardens or tucked beneath their windows, surrounded by sunflowers, phlox, and hollyhocks, to what can truly be called the modern beekeeping factory. This structure can hold more than three hundred pounds of honey across three or four levels of stacked combs sealed in a frame that allows them to be removed and managed, with the honey harvested through centrifugal force using a turbine, and then the combs can be put back in place like a book on a well-organized shelf.

And one fine day the industry or caprice of man will install a docile swarm in one of these disconcerting abodes. And there the little insect is expected to learn its bearings, to find its way, to establish its home; to modify the seemingly unchangeable plans dictated by the nature of things. In this unfamiliar place it is required to determine the site of the winter storehouses, that must not extend beyond the zone of heat that issues from the half-numbed inhabitants; it must divine the exact point where the brood-cells shall concentrate, under penalty of disaster should these be too high or too low, too near to or far from the door. The swarm, it may be, has just left the trunk of a fallen tree, containing one long, narrow, depressed, horizontal gallery; and it finds itself now in a tower-shaped edifice, whose roof is lost in gloom. Or, to take a case that is more usual, perhaps, and one that will give some idea of the surprise habitually in store for the bees: after having lived for centuries past beneath the straw dome of our village hives, they are suddenly transplanted to a species of mighty cupboard, or chest, three or four times as large as the place of their birth; and installed in the midst of a confused scaffolding of superposed frames, some running parallel to the entrance and some perpendicular; the whole forming a bewildering network that obscures the surfaces of their dwelling.

And one day, by human design or whim, a compliant swarm will be placed in one of these puzzling homes. There, the little insect is expected to figure out its surroundings, navigate its way, and set up its home; to adjust the seemingly unchangeable plans dictated by nature. In this unfamiliar space, it needs to pinpoint the location of the winter storage, which shouldn't go beyond the warmth provided by the semi-comatose residents; it must identify the exact spot where the brood-cells should gather, with disaster looming if they are placed too high or low, too close to or far from the entrance. The swarm may have just left the trunk of a fallen tree, which had one long, narrow, depressed, horizontal tunnel; and now it finds itself in a tower-like structure, whose roof is shrouded in darkness. Or, to consider a more typical scenario that gives an idea of the surprises often awaiting the bees: after living for centuries under the straw dome of our village hives, they are suddenly moved to a type of massive cupboard or chest, three or four times larger than their birthplace; and placed amid a chaotic framework of stacked frames, some aligned parallel to the entrance and some perpendicular; creating a confusing network that obscures the surfaces of their new home.

And yet, for all this, there exists not a single instance of a swarm refusing its duty, or allowing itself to be baffled or discouraged by the strangeness of its surroundings, except only in the case of the new dwelling being absolutely uninhabitable, or impregnated with evil odours. And even then the bees will not be disheartened or bewildered; even then they will not abandon their mission. The swarm will simply forsake the inhospitable abode, to seek better fortune some little distance away. And similarly it can never be said of them that they can be induced to undertake any illogical or foolish task. Their common-sense has never been known to fail them; they have never, at a loss for definite decision, erected at haphazard structures of a wild or heterogeneous nature. Though you place the swarm in a sphere, a cube, or a pyramid, in an oval or polygonal basket, you will find, on visiting the bees a few days later, that if this strange assembly of little independent intellects has accepted the new abode, they will at once, and unhesitatingly and unanimously have known how to select the most favourable, often humanly speaking the only possible spot in this absurd habitation, in pursuance of a method whose principles may appear inflexible, but whose results are strikingly vivid.

And yet, despite all this, there isn’t a single instance of a swarm refusing its duty or getting confused or discouraged by the oddness of its surroundings, except when the new home is completely unlivable or filled with bad odors. Even then, the bees won’t be disheartened or puzzled; they won’t abandon their mission. The swarm will just leave the unsuitable place to find better options a bit further away. Similarly, it can never be said that they would agree to take on any illogical or foolish task. Their common sense has never let them down; they have never, in moments of indecision, built random structures that are chaotic or mismatched. No matter if you put the swarm in a sphere, a cube, a pyramid, or an oval or polygon-shaped basket, if you check on the bees a few days later, you will find that if this group of little independent thinkers has accepted the new home, they will have quickly and decisively chosen the best spot, often the only reasonable one in this strange setup, using a method whose rules may seem rigid but whose results are remarkably clear.

When installed in one of the huge factories, bristling with frames, that we mentioned just now, these frames will interest them only to the extent in which they provide them with a basis or point of departure for their combs; and they very naturally pay not the slightest heed to the desires or intentions of man. But if the apiarist have taken the precaution of surrounding the upper lath of some of these frames with a narrow fillet of wax, they will be quick to perceive the advantage this tempting offer presents, and will carefully extract the fillet, using their own wax as solder, and will prolong the comb in accordance with the indicated plan. Similarly—and the case is frequent in modern apiculture—if all the frames of the hive into which the bees have been gathered be covered from top to bottom with leaves of foundation-wax, they will not waste time in erecting buildings across or beside these, or in producing useless wax, but, finding that the work is already half finished, they will be satisfied to deepen and lengthen each of the cells designed in the leaf, carefully rectifying these where there is the slightest deviation from the strictest vertical. Proceeding in this fashion, therefore, they will possess in a week a city as luxurious and well-constructed as the one they have quitted; whereas, had they been thrown on their own resources, it would have taken them two or three months to construct so great a profusion of dwellings and storehouses of shining wax.

When installed in one of the large factories filled with frames that we just mentioned, these frames will only catch their interest if they give them a starting point for their combs; they naturally don't pay any attention to what humans want or intend. However, if the beekeeper has taken the step of surrounding the upper edge of some of these frames with a narrow strip of wax, the bees will quickly notice the advantage this tempting offer provides, and they will carefully remove the strip, using their own wax as adhesive, and will extend the comb according to the plan indicated. Likewise—and this is common in modern beekeeping—if all the frames of the hive that the bees have settled in are covered completely with sheets of foundation wax, they won't waste time building across or next to these, or producing unnecessary wax, but instead, finding the work already half done, they'll be satisfied to deepen and lengthen each of the cells outlined in the sheet, carefully correcting them if there's any deviation from being perfectly vertical. By proceeding in this way, they will end up with a beautifully constructed city in a week, just as luxurious and well-made as the one they left; whereas, if they had to rely on their own efforts, it would have taken them two or three months to build such an abundance of homes and storehouses made of shiny wax.

{43}

{43}

This power of appropriation may well be considered to overstep the limit of instinct; and indeed there can be nothing more arbitrary than the distinction we draw between instinct and intelligence properly so-called. Sir John Lubbock, whose observations on ants, bees, and wasps are so interesting and so personal, is reluctant to credit the bee, from the moment it forsakes the routine of its habitual labour, with any power of discernment or reasoning. This attitude of his may be due in some measure to an unconscious bias in favour of the ants, whose ways he has more specially noted; for the entomologist is always inclined to regard that insect as the more intelligent to which he has more particularly devoted himself, and we have to be on our guard against this little personal predilection. As a proof of his theory, Sir John cites as an instance an experiment within the reach of all. If you place in a bottle half a dozen bees and the same number of flies, and lay the bottle down horizontally, with its base to the window, you will find that the bees will persist, till they die of exhaustion or hunger, in their endeavour to discover an issue through the glass; while the flies, in less than two minutes, will all have sallied forth through the neck on the opposite side. From this Sir John Lubbock concludes that the intelligence of the bee is exceedingly limited, and that the fly shows far greater skill in extricating itself from a difficulty, and finding its way. This conclusion, however, would not seem altogether flawless. Turn the transparent sphere twenty times, if you will, holding now the base, now the neck, to the window, and you will find that the bees will turn twenty times with it, so as always to face the light. It is their love of the light, it is their very intelligence, that is their undoing in this experiment of the English savant. They evidently imagine that the issue from every prison must be there where the light shines clearest; and they act in accordance, and persist in too logical action. To them glass is a supernatural mystery they never have met with in nature; they have had no experience of this suddenly impenetrable atmosphere; and, the greater their intelligence, the more inadmissible, more incomprehensible, will the strange obstacle appear. Whereas the featherbrained flies, careless of logic as of the enigma of crystal, disregarding the call of the light, flutter wildly hither and thither, and, meeting here the good fortune that often waits on the simple, who find salvation there where the wiser will perish, necessarily end by discovering the friendly opening that restores their liberty to them.

This ability to take control could easily be seen as going beyond instinct; in fact, the line we draw between instinct and true intelligence is quite arbitrary. Sir John Lubbock, whose observations on ants, bees, and wasps are both fascinating and personal, is hesitant to credit the bee with any ability to understand or reason once it leaves its usual routine. This view might partly come from an unconscious preference for ants, which he has studied more closely; entomologists often see the insect they focus on as the smartest. We need to be cautious of this personal bias. To support his theory, Sir John presents a simple experiment. If you put half a dozen bees and an equal number of flies in a bottle and lay it on its side with the bottom facing the window, you'll see that the bees will keep trying to find a way out through the glass until they exhaust themselves or starve, while the flies will all escape through the opening on the opposite side in less than two minutes. From this, Sir John concludes that the intelligence of bees is very limited, and that flies are much better at navigating challenges and finding their way out. However, this conclusion doesn't seem entirely sound. If you turn the clear bottle around multiple times, holding the bottom and the neck toward the window, you'll notice that the bees will keep turning with it to always face the light. It's their attraction to the light, their very intelligence, that trips them up in this experiment by the English scientist. They clearly believe that the way out must be where the light shines brightest; they act accordingly and stick to a too-logical approach. To them, glass is an unnatural mystery they haven't encountered before in nature; they lack experience with this suddenly impermeable barrier, and the more intelligent they are, the more confusing this strange obstacle seems to them. In contrast, the flighty flies, ignoring logic and the mystery of glass, disregarding the allure of light, flit around chaotically and, by sheer luck, often stumble upon the opening that brings them back to freedom.

The same naturalist cites yet another proof of the bees' lack of intelligence, and discovers it in the following quotation from the great American apiarist, the venerable and paternal Langstroth:—

The same naturalist points out another example of the bees' lack of intelligence, referencing the following quote from the great American beekeeper, the esteemed and fatherly Langstroth:—

"As the fly was not intended to banquet on blossoms, but on substances in which it might easily be drowned, it cautiously alights on the edge of any vessel containing liquid food, and warily helps itself; while the poor bee, plunging in headlong, speedily perishes. The sad fate of their unfortunate companions does not in the least deter others who approach the tempting lure from madly alighting on the bodies of the dying and the dead, to share the same miserable end. No one can understand the extent of their infatuation until he has seen a confectioner's shop assailed by myriads of hungry bees. I have seen thousands strained out from the syrups in which they had perished; thousands more alighting even on the boiling sweets; the floors covered and windows darkened with bees, some crawling, others flying, and others still so completely besmeared as to be able neither to crawl nor to fly—not one in ten able to carry home its ill-gotten spoils, and yet the air filled with new hosts of thoughtless comers."

"As the fly wasn't meant to feast on flowers, but on substances where it could easily drown, it carefully lands on the edge of any container with liquid food and cautiously helps itself; while the poor bee, diving in recklessly, quickly meets its end. The unfortunate fate of their doomed companions does nothing to stop others who are drawn to the enticing treat from madly landing on the bodies of the dying and the dead, to face the same tragic outcome. No one can grasp the depth of their obsession until they've seen a candy store overwhelmed by swarms of hungry bees. I've witnessed thousands pulled from the syrups in which they had died; thousands more landing even on the boiling sweets; the floors covered and windows darkened with bees, some crawling, others flying, and still others so completely covered in syrup that they could neither crawl nor fly—not one in ten able to take home its ill-gotten gains, and yet the air filled with new waves of thoughtless newcomers."

This, however, seems to me no more conclusive than might be the spectacle of a battlefield, or of the ravages of alcoholism, to a superhuman observer bent on establishing the limits of human understanding. Indeed, less so, perhaps; for the situation of the bee, when compared with our own, is strange in this world. It was intended to live in the midst of an indifferent and unconscious nature, and not by the side of an extraordinary being who is forever disturbing the most constant laws, and producing grandiose, inexplicable phenomena. In the natural order of things, in the monotonous life of the forest, the madness Langstroth describes would be possible only were some accident suddenly to destroy a hive full of honey. But in this case, even, there would be no fatal glass, no boiling sugar or cloying syrup; no death or danger, therefore, other than that to which every animal is exposed while seeking its prey.

This, however, doesn’t seem any more convincing to me than watching a battlefield or witnessing the effects of alcoholism, especially to a superhuman observer trying to understand the limits of human comprehension. In fact, it might be less convincing; because the situation of the bee, compared to ours, is odd in this world. It was meant to live among an indifferent and unconscious nature, not alongside an extraordinary being that constantly disrupts the most fundamental laws and creates grand, mysterious phenomena. In the natural order of things, in the repetitive life of the forest, the chaos Langstroth talks about would only be possible if some accident suddenly wiped out a hive full of honey. But even then, there would be no fatal glass, no boiling sugar or sickly syrup; no death or danger, other than what every animal faces while hunting for its food.

Should we be more successful than they in preserving our presence of mind if some strange power were at every step to ensnare our reason? Let us not be too hasty in condemning the bees for the folly whereof we are the authors, or in deriding their intellect, which is as poorly equipped to foil our artifices as our own would be to foil those of some superior creature unknown to us to-day, but on that account not impossible. None such being known at present, we conclude that we stand on the topmost pinnacle of life on this earth; but this belief, after all, is by no means infallible. I am not assuming that when our actions are unreasonable, or contemptible, we merely fall into the snares that such a creature has laid; though it is not inconceivable that this should one day be proved true. On the other hand, it cannot be wise to deny intelligence to the bee because it has not yet succeeded in distinguishing us from the great ape or the bear. It is certain that there are, in us and about us, influences and powers no less dissimilar whose distinction escapes us as readily.

Should we be more successful than they in keeping our composure if some strange force were constantly trying to trap our reason? Let’s not be too quick to blame the bees for the foolishness we ourselves create, or to mock their intelligence, which is just as ill-equipped to counter our tricks as ours would be against some superior being we haven't encountered yet, but that doesn’t mean it’s impossible. Since we don’t know of such a being right now, we might think we’re at the height of life on this planet; however, this belief isn’t guaranteed to be right. I’m not saying that when our actions are unreasonable or disgusting, we’re just falling into traps set by such a creature, although it’s not out of the question that this could be proven true one day. On the other hand, it wouldn’t be smart to dismiss the bee's intelligence just because it hasn’t figured out how to differentiate us from the great ape or the bear. It’s clear that we have influences and forces around us that are just as different, which we often fail to recognize.

And finally, to end this apology, wherein I seem somewhat to have fallen into the error I laid to Sir John Lubbock's charge, does not the capacity for folly so great in itself argue intelligence? For thus it is ever in the uncertain domain of the intellect, apparently the most vacillating and precarious condition of matter. The same light that falls on the intellect falls also on passion, whereof none can tell whether it be the smoke of the flame or the wick. In the case above it has not been mere animal desire to gorge themselves with honey that has urged on the bees. They could do this at their leisure in the store-rooms at home. Watch them in an analogous circumstance; follow them; you will see that, as soon as their sac is filled, they will return to the hive and add their spoil to the general store; and visit the marvellous vintage, and leave it, perhaps thirty times in an hour. Their admirable labours, therefore, are inspired by a single desire: zeal to bring as much wealth as they can to the home of their sisters, which is also the home of the future. When we discover a cause as disinterested for the follies of men, we are apt to call them by another name.

And finally, to wrap up this apology, where I seem to have made the same mistake I accused Sir John Lubbock of, doesn't the ability to act foolishly actually suggest a level of intelligence? Because it’s always like this in the unpredictable area of the mind, which appears to be the most unstable and changing state of existence. The same light that shines on the mind also shines on passion, and no one can determine whether it’s the smoke from the fire or the wick itself. In the case mentioned, the bees aren’t just driven by a basic urge to gorge on honey. They could do that whenever they wanted in their home storage. Observe them in a similar situation; if you follow them, you’ll see that as soon as their stomach is full, they head back to the hive and add their haul to the collective stash, visiting the amazing source and leaving it, maybe thirty times in an hour. Their incredible work is therefore fueled by one single motivation: a commitment to bring as much wealth back to their sisters' home, which is also the home of the future. When we find a selfless reason behind the foolishness of humans, we often call it something different.

{44}

{44}

However, the whole truth must be told. In the midst of the marvels of their industry, their policy, their sacrifice, one thing exists that must always check and weaken our admiration; and this is the indifference with which they regard the misfortunes or death of their comrades. There is a strange duality in the character of the bee. In the heart of the hive all help and love each other. They are as united as the good thoughts that dwell in the same soul. Wound one of them, and a thousand will sacrifice themselves to avenge its injury. But outside the hive they no longer recognise each other. Mutilate them, crush them,—or rather, do nothing of the kind; it would be a useless cruelty, for the fact is established beyond any doubt,—but were you to mutilate, or crush, on a piece of comb placed a few steps from their dwelling, twenty or thirty bees that have all issued from the same hive, those you have left untouched will not even turn their heads. With their tongue, fantastic as a Chinese weapon, they will tranquilly continue to absorb the liquid they hold more precious than life, heedless of the agony whose last gestures almost are touching them, of the cries of distress that arise all around. And when the comb is empty, so great is their anxiety that nothing shall be lost, that their eagerness to gather the honey which clings to the victims will induce them tranquilly to climb over dead and dying, unmoved by the presence of the first and never dreaming of helping the others. In this case, therefore, they have no notion of the danger they run, seeing that they are wholly untroubled by the death that is scattered about them, and they have not the slightest sense of solidarity or pity. As regards the danger, the explanation lies ready to hand; the bees know not the meaning of fear, and, with the exception only of smoke, are afraid of nothing in the world. Outside the hive, they display extreme condescension and forbearance. They will avoid whatever disturbs them, and affect to ignore its existence, so long as it come not too close; as though aware that this universe belongs to all, that each one has his place there, and must needs be discreet and peaceful. But beneath this indulgence is quietly hidden a heart so sure of itself that it never dreams of protesting. If they are threatened, they will alter their course, but never attempt to escape. In the hive, however, they will not confine themselves to this passive ignoring of peril. They will spring with incredible fury on any living thing, ant or lion or man, that dares to profane the sacred ark. This we may term anger, ridiculous obstinacy, or heroism, according as our mind be disposed.

However, the whole truth must be told. Amidst the wonders of their industry, their policies, and their sacrifices, there’s one thing that will always hold back and weaken our admiration: their indifference to the misfortunes or deaths of their fellow bees. There’s a strange duality in the nature of bees. Inside the hive, they help and care for one another. They’re as united as the good thoughts that exist within a single soul. If one gets hurt, a thousand will sacrifice themselves to avenge that injury. But outside the hive, they no longer recognize each other. If you injure or crush them—though honestly, don't do that; it would be pointless cruelty, as the fact is clear—if you were to hurt or crush twenty or thirty bees on a piece of comb a few steps away from their home, those that remain untouched won’t even glance over. With their tongue, as unusual as a Chinese weapon, they will calmly continue to suck up the liquid they value more than life, oblivious to the suffering of those nearby, and to the cries of distress that echo around them. And when the comb is empty, they’re so anxious not to waste anything that their eagerness to gather the honey clinging to the victims will lead them to calmly crawl over the dead and dying, indifferent to the presence of the former and unaware of the need to help the latter. In this scenario, they have no sense of the danger they face, since they are completely unconcerned about the deaths surrounding them, lacking even an ounce of solidarity or compassion. Regarding the danger, the explanation is clear; bees don’t know fear, and except for smoke, they’re not afraid of anything in the world. Outside the hive, they show extreme condescension and patience. They will avoid whatever bothers them and pretend it doesn’t exist, as long as it doesn’t get too close; as if they recognize that this universe belongs to everyone, that each one has their place, and that they must be discreet and peaceful. But beneath this tolerance lies a heart so self-assured that it never considers protesting. If they’re threatened, they’ll change direction, but they never try to flee. However, inside the hive, they won’t just passively ignore danger. They will fiercely attack any living thing—be it an ant, a lion, or a human—that dares to invade their sacred space. We might call this anger, ridiculous stubbornness, or heroism, depending on how we see it.

But of their want of solidarity outside the hive, and even of sympathy within it, I can find nothing to say. Are we to believe that each form of intellect possesses its own strange limitation, and that the tiny flame which with so much difficulty at last burns its way through inert matter and issues forth from the brain, is still so uncertain that if it illumine one point more strongly the others are forced into blacker darkness? Here we find that the bees (or nature acting within them) have organised work in common, the love and cult of the future, in a manner more perfect than can elsewhere be discovered. Is it for this reason that they have lost sight of all the rest? They give their love to what lies ahead of them; we bestow ours on what is around. And we who love here, perhaps, have no love left for what is beyond. Nothing varies so much as the direction of pity or charity. We ourselves should formerly have been far less shocked than we are to-day at the insensibility of the bees; and to many an ancient people such conduct would not have seemed blameworthy. And further, can we tell how many of the things that we do would shock a being who might be watching us as we watch the bees?

But about their lack of solidarity outside the hive, and even the absence of sympathy within it, I have nothing to say. Should we really believe that each type of intelligence has its own strange limitations, and that the tiny spark which struggles so hard to emerge from inert matter and comes from the brain is so unpredictable that if it lights one area more brightly, the others are plunged into deeper darkness? Here, we see that the bees (or nature acting through them) have organized communal work, fostering love and commitment to the future in a way that's more perfect than we find anywhere else. Is this why they’ve lost sight of everything else? They invest their love in what lies ahead; we put ours into what’s currently around us. And perhaps we, who love what’s present, have no love left for what’s beyond. No two directions of compassion or charity are the same. In the past, we might have been less shocked by the bees’ insensitivity than we are today; to many ancient cultures, such behavior wouldn’t have seemed wrong. Moreover, how many of the things we do would shock someone observing us in the same way we observe the bees?





IV — THE LIFE OF THE BEE

{45}

LET us now, in order to form a clearer conception of the bees' intellectual power, proceed to consider their methods of inter-communication. There can be no doubting that they understand each other; and indeed it were surely impossible for a republic so considerable, wherein the labours are so varied and so marvellously combined, to subsist amid the silence and spiritual isolation of so many thousand creatures. They must be able, therefore, to give expression to thoughts and feelings, by means either of a phonetic vocabulary or more probably of some kind of tactile language or magnetic intuition, corresponding perhaps to senses and properties of matter wholly unknown to ourselves. And such intuition well might lodge in the mysterious antennae—containing, in the case of the workers, according to Cheshire's calculation, twelve thousand tactile hairs and five thousand "smell-hollows," wherewith they probe and fathom the darkness. For the mutual understanding of the bees is not confined to their habitual labours; the extraordinary also has a name and place in their language; as is proved by the manner in which news, good or bad, normal or supernatural, will at once spread in the hive; the loss or return of the mother, for instance, the entrance of an enemy, the intrusion of a strange queen, the approach of a band of marauders, the discovery of treasure, etc. And so characteristic is their attitude, so essentially different their murmur at each of these special events, that the experienced apiarist can without difficulty tell what is troubling the crowd that moves distractedly to and fro in the shadow.

LET's now, to get a clearer picture of the bees' intelligence, look at how they communicate with each other. There's no doubt they understand one another; it's really impossible for such a significant community, with such varied and wonderfully coordinated activities, to exist in silence and isolation among so many thousands of creatures. Therefore, they must be able to express thoughts and feelings, possibly through a spoken vocabulary or, more likely, some kind of tactile language or magnetic intuition, which might relate to senses and properties of matter that we don't even know about. This intuition could very well reside in their mysterious antennae—containing, in the case of the workers, according to Cheshire's calculation, twelve thousand tactile hairs and five thousand "smell-hollows," which they use to explore the darkness. The bees' mutual understanding isn't limited to their usual tasks; they also have names and ways to express extraordinary events. This is evident in how news, whether good or bad, normal or unusual, quickly spreads throughout the hive; for example, the loss or return of the queen, the entrance of a predator, the arrival of a strange queen, the approach of a group of attackers, the discovery of food, and so on. Their reactions are so distinctive and their tones so different for each of these events that an experienced beekeeper can easily identify what is causing the commotion among the bees that are busily moving around in the shadows.

If you desire a more definite proof, you have but to watch a bee that shall just have discovered a few drops of honey on your window-sill or the corner of your table. She will immediately gorge herself with it; and so eagerly, that you will have time, without fear of disturbing her, to mark her tiny belt with a touch of paint. But this gluttony of hers is all on the surface; the honey will not pass into the stomach proper, into what we might call her personal stomach, but remains in the sac, the first stomach,—that of the community, if one may so express it. This reservoir full, the bee will depart, but not with the free and thoughtless motion of the fly or butterfly; she, on the contrary, will for some moments fly backwards, hovering eagerly about the table or window, with her head turned toward the room.

If you want more clear evidence, just watch a bee that has just found a few drops of honey on your window sill or the edge of your table. She will immediately stuff herself with it; so eagerly, in fact, that you'll have time to mark her tiny waist with a little paint without worrying about bothering her. But this gluttony is only superficial; the honey doesn't go into her main stomach, what we might call her personal stomach, but stays in the pouch, the first stomach — the one for the community, if you will. Once this pouch is full, the bee will leave, but not in the carefree and thoughtless way of a fly or butterfly; instead, she will fly backward for a moment, hovering eagerly around the table or window, with her head facing into the room.

She is reconnoitring, fixing in her memory the exact position of the treasure. Thereupon she will go to the hive, disgorge her plunder into one of the provision-cells, and in three or four minutes return, and resume operations at the providential window. And thus, while the honey lasts, will she come and go, at intervals of every five minutes, till evening, if need be; without interruption or rest; pursuing her regular journeys from the hive to the window, from the window back to the hive.

She is exploring, memorizing the exact location of the treasure. Then she will go to the hive, unload her loot into one of the storage cells, and in three or four minutes return to continue her work at the lucky window. So, as long as the honey lasts, she will keep coming and going every five minutes until evening, if necessary; without stopping or resting; making her usual trips from the hive to the window and back.

{46}

{46}

Many of those who have written on bees have thought fit to adorn the truth; I myself have no such desire. For studies of this description to possess any interest, it is essential that they should remain absolutely sincere. Had the conclusion been forced upon me that bees are incapable of communicating to each other news of an event occurring outside the hive, I should, I imagine, as a set-off against the slight disappointment this discovery would have entailed, have derived some degree of satisfaction in recognising once more that man, after all, is the only truly intelligent being who inhabits our globe. And there comes too a period of life when we have more joy in saying the thing that is true than in saying the thing that merely is wonderful. Here as in every case the principle holds that, should the naked truth appear at the moment less interesting, less great and noble than the imaginary embellishment it lies in our power to bestow, the fault must rest with ourselves who still are unable to perceive the astonishing relation in which this truth always must stand to our being, and to universal law; and in that case it is not the truth, but our intellect, that needs embellishment and ennoblement.

Many of those who have written about bees have felt the need to embellish the truth; I, however, have no such desire. For studies like this to hold any interest, it’s crucial that they remain completely honest. If I had come to the conclusion that bees can’t communicate about events happening outside the hive, I think, despite the slight disappointment this discovery would cause, I would feel some satisfaction in recognizing once again that humans are the only truly intelligent beings on our planet. There also comes a time in life when we find more joy in stating what is true than in sharing what is merely amazing. Here, as in every case, the principle applies that if the bare truth seems less interesting, less grand, and less noble than the imaginative embellishment we choose to add, the fault lies with us for not being able to see the incredible connection that truth has to our existence and to universal law; in such cases, it’s not the truth that needs embellishment and elevation, but our own understanding.

I will frankly confess, therefore, that the marked bee often returns alone. Shall we believe that in bees there exists the same difference of character as in men; that of them too some are gossips, and others prone to silence? A friend who stood by and watched my experiment, declared that it was evidently mere selfishness or vanity that caused so many of the bees to refrain from revealing the source of their wealth, and from sharing with others the glory of an achievement that must seem miraculous to the hive. These were sad vices indeed, which give not forth the sweet odour, so fragrant and loyal, that springs from the home of the many thousand sisters. But, whatever the cause, it often will also happen that the bee whom fortune has favoured will return to the honey accompanied by two or three friends. I am aware that Sir John Lubbock, in the appendix to his book on "Ants, Bees, and Wasps," records the results of his investigations in long and minute tables; and from these we are led to infer that it is a matter of rarest occurrence for a single bee to follow the one who has made the discovery. The learned naturalist does not name the race of bees which he selected for his experiments, or tell us whether the conditions were especially unfavourable. As for myself I only can say that my own tables, compiled with great care,—and every possible precaution having been taken that the bees should not be directly attracted by the odour of the honey,—establish that on an average one bee will bring others four times out of ten.

I will honestly admit that the marked bee often returns alone. Should we believe that bees have different personalities like humans do, with some being chatty and others more reserved? A friend who was observing my experiment said it seemed like pure selfishness or vanity that led so many bees to keep the source of their treasure to themselves, not wanting to share the glory of an achievement that must seem amazing to the hive. These are indeed unfortunate flaws, which don’t give off the sweet fragrance, so delightful and loyal, that comes from the home of countless sisters. However, whatever the reason, it often happens that a bee who has been lucky will return to the honey with two or three friends. I know that Sir John Lubbock, in the appendix to his book on "Ants, Bees, and Wasps," describes his findings in detailed tables, and from those we can gather that it is extremely rare for a single bee to follow the one who discovered something. The learned naturalist does not mention the specific type of bee he used for his experiments, nor does he tell us if the conditions were particularly unfavorable. As for me, I can only say that my own tables, made with great care—and taking every possible precaution to ensure the bees were not drawn in by the scent of the honey—show that on average, one bee will bring others four times out of ten.

I even one day came across an extraordinary little Italian bee, whose belt I had marked with a touch of blue paint. In her second trip she brought two of her sisters, whom I imprisoned, without interfering with her. She departed once more, and this time returned with three friends, whom I again confined, and so till the end of the afternoon, when, counting my prisoners, I found that she had told the news to no less than eighteen bees.

I even came across an amazing little Italian bee one day, and I had marked her belt with a bit of blue paint. On her second trip, she brought two of her sisters, whom I captured without bothering her. She left again and came back with three more friends, whom I once again captured, and so on until the end of the afternoon, when I counted my prisoners and found that she had communicated with no less than eighteen bees.

In fact you will find, if you make this experiment yourself, that communication, if not general, at least is frequent. The possession of this faculty is so well known to American bee-hunters that they trade upon it when engaged in searching for nests. Mr. Josiah Emery remarks on this head (quoted by Romanes in his "Intellect of Animals"): "Going to a field or wood at a distance from tame bees with their box of honey, they gather up from the flowers and imprison one or more bees, and after they have become sufficiently gorged, let them out to return to their home with their easily gotten load. Waiting patiently a longer or shorter time, according to the distance of the bee-tree, the hunter scarcely ever fails to see the bee or bees return accompanied by other bees, which are in like manner imprisoned till they in turn are filled; then one or more are let out at places distant from each other, and the direction in which the bee flies noted; and thus, by a kind of triangulation, the position of the bee-tree proximately ascertained."

In fact, you’ll find, if you try this experiment yourself, that communication, if not universal, at least happens often. American bee-hunters are very aware of this ability and use it when looking for nests. Mr. Josiah Emery notes on this point (quoted by Romanes in his "Intellect of Animals"): "Going to a field or woods away from tame bees with their box of honey, they catch one or more bees from the flowers and let them fill up. After they’ve had enough, they’re released to go back home with their easy haul. After waiting patiently for a while, depending on how far the bee-tree is, the hunter almost always sees the bee or bees come back with other bees, which are similarly captured until they’re filled; then one or more are let go at different spots, and the direction the bee flies in is noted; this way, through a sort of triangulation, the location of the bee-tree is roughly determined."

{47}

{47}

You will notice too in your experiments that the friends who appear to obey the behests of good fortune do not always fly together, and that there will often be an interval of several seconds between the different arrivals. As regards these communications, therefore, we must ask ourselves the question that Sir John Lubbock has solved as far as the ants are concerned.

You will also notice in your experiments that the friends who seem to follow the whims of good luck don't always come together, and there will often be a gap of several seconds between the different arrivals. Regarding these communications, we need to ask ourselves the question that Sir John Lubbock has answered when it comes to ants.

Do the comrades who flock to the treasure only follow the bee that first made the discovery, or have they been sent on by her, and do they find it through following her indications, her description of the place where it lies? Between these two hypotheses, that refer directly to the extent and working of the bee's intellect, there is obviously an enormous difference. The English savant has succeeded, by means of an elaborate and ingenious arrangement of gangways, corridors, moats full of water, and flying bridges, in establishing that the ants in such cases do no more than follow in the track of the pioneering insect. With ants, that can be made to pass where one will, such experiments are possible; but for the bee, whose wings throw every avenue open, some other expedient must of necessity be contrived. I imagined the following, which, though it gave no definite result, might yet, under more favourable conditions, and if organised more carefully, give rise to definite and satisfactory conclusions.

Do the comrades who gather around the treasure only follow the bee that first found it, or have they been directed by her and do they locate it by following her clues and her description of where it is? There's a huge difference between these two possibilities, which directly relate to the bee's intelligence. An English scholar has shown, through a complex and clever setup of paths, corridors, water-filled moats, and aerial bridges, that ants in these situations simply follow the trail of the leading insect. With ants, which can be directed to go wherever needed, such experiments are feasible. But for bees, which can fly anywhere, some other method has to be devised. I thought of the following, which, although it didn't provide a clear result, might still, under better conditions and with more careful organization, lead to clear and satisfying conclusions.

My study in the country is on the first floor, above a somewhat lofty room; sufficiently high, therefore, to be out of the ordinary range of the bees' flight, except at times when the chestnuts and lime trees are in bloom. And for more than a week before I started this experiment I had kept on my table an open comb of honey, without the perfume having attracted, or induced the visit of, a single bee. Then I went to a glass hive that was close to the house, took an Italian bee, brought her to my study, set her on the comb, and marked her while she was feeding.

My study in the countryside is on the first floor, above a fairly tall room; it's high enough that it's usually out of the bees' flight range, except when the chestnuts and lime trees are blooming. For over a week before I started this experiment, I had an open honeycomb on my table, and the scent never attracted or brought in a single bee. Then I went to a glass hive near the house, took an Italian bee, brought her to my study, placed her on the comb, and marked her while she was feeding.

When satisfied, she flew away and returned to the hive. I followed, saw her pass over the surface of the crowd, plunge her head into an empty cell, disgorge her honey, and prepare to set forth again. At the door of the hive I had placed a glass box, divided by a trap into two compartments. The bee flew into this box; and as she was alone, and no other bee seemed to accompany or follow her, I imprisoned her and left her there. I then repeated the experiment on twenty different bees in succession. When the marked bee reappeared alone, I imprisoned her as I had imprisoned the first. But eight of them came to the threshold of the hive and entered the box accompanied by two or three friends. By means of the trap I was able to separate the marked bee from her companions, and to keep her a prisoner in the first compartment. Then, having marked her companions with a different colour, I threw open the second compartment and set them at liberty, myself returning quickly to my study to await their arrival. Now it is evident that if a verbal or magnetic communication had passed, indicating the place, describing the way, etc., a certain number of the bees, having been furnished with this information, should have found their way to my room. I am compelled to admit that there came but a single one. Was this mere chance, or had she followed instructions received? The experiment was insufficient, but circumstances prevented me from carrying it further. I released the "baited" bees, and my study soon was besieged by the buzzing crowd to whom they had taught the way to the treasure.

When she was done, she flew off and went back to the hive. I followed her and watched as she passed over the crowd, dipped her head into an empty cell, released her honey, and prepared to take off again. At the entrance of the hive, I had set up a glass box divided by a trap into two sections. The bee flew into this box; since she was alone and no other bees seemed to be with or following her, I trapped her and left her there. I then repeated the experiment with twenty different bees one after another. When the marked bee came back alone, I trapped her just like the first one. However, eight of them reached the hive's threshold and entered the box with two or three companions. Using the trap, I separated the marked bee from her friends and kept her locked in the first section. Then, after marking her companions with a different color, I opened the second section and set them free, quickly heading back to my study to wait for them. Now, it's clear that if some form of communication had occurred, indicating where to go, describing the way, etc., a certain number of the bees, having this information, should have found their way to my room. I have to admit that only one of them showed up. Was that just coincidence, or had she followed some instructions? The experiment wasn't enough, but circumstances stopped me from going further. I released the "baited" bees, and soon my study was swarmed by the buzzing crowd they had shown the way to the treasure.

We need not concern ourselves with this incomplete attempt of mine, for many other curious traits compel us to recognise the existence among the bees of spiritual communications that go beyond a mere "yes" or "no," and that are manifest in cases where mere example or gesture would not be sufficient. Of such, for instance, are the remarkable harmony of their work in the hive, the extraordinary division of labour, the regularity with which one worker will take the place of another, etc. I have often marked bees that went foraging in the morning, and found that, in the afternoon, unless flowers were specially abundant, they would be engaged in heating and fanning the brood-cells, or perhaps would form part of the mysterious, motionless curtain in whose midst the wax-makers and sculptors would be at work. Similarly I have noticed that workers whom I have seen gathering pollen for the whole of one day, will bring no pollen back on the morrow, but will concern themselves exclusively with the search for nectar, and vice-versa.

We shouldn’t worry about my incomplete attempt here, because many other interesting traits make us recognize that bees communicate in ways that go beyond a simple "yes" or "no." This is evident in situations where a simple example or gesture wouldn't be enough. For example, there's the amazing harmony in their work inside the hive, the incredible division of labor, and the way one worker regularly takes over for another, among other things. I've often observed bees that went out to gather food in the morning. In the afternoon, unless there were plenty of flowers around, they would be busy warming and fanning the brood cells or would be part of the mysterious, still curtain while the wax-makers and sculptors worked nearby. I've also noticed that workers who spent the whole day collecting pollen wouldn’t bring any pollen back the next day, instead focusing entirely on finding nectar, and vice versa.

{48}

{48}

And further, we might mention what M. Georges de Layens, the celebrated French apiarist, terms the "Distribution of Bees over Melliferous Plants." Day after day, at the first hour of sunrise, the explorers of the dawn return, and the hive awakes to receive the good news of the earth. "The lime trees are blossoming to-day on the banks of the canal." "The grass by the roadside is gay with white clover." "The sage and the lotus are about to open." "The mignonette, the lilies are overflowing with pollen." Whereupon the bees must organise quickly, and arrange to divide the work. Five thousand of the sturdiest will sully forth to the lime trees, while three thousand juniors go and refresh the white clover. Those who yesterday were absorbing nectar from the corollas will to-day repose their tongue and the glands of their sac, and gather red pollen from the mignonette, or yellow pollen from the tall lilies; for never shall you see a bee collecting or mixing pollen of a different colour or species; and indeed one of the chief pre-occupations of the hive is the methodical bestowal of these pollens in the store-rooms, in strict accordance with their origin and colour. Thus does the hidden genius issue its commands. The workers immediately sally forth, in long black files, whereof each one will fly straight to its allotted task. "The bees," says De Layens, "would seem to be perfectly informed as to the locality, the relative melliferous value, and the distance of every melliferous plant within a certain radius from the hive.

And additionally, we could highlight what M. Georges de Layens, the famous French beekeeper, refers to as the "Distribution of Bees over Flowering Plants." Day after day, right at sunrise, the dawn explorers return, and the hive wakes up to hear the good news about the world. "The lime trees are blooming today along the canal." "The grass by the roadside is filled with white clover." "The sage and lotus are about to bloom." "The mignonette and lilies are full of pollen." At this point, the bees need to quickly organize and divide the work. Five thousand of the strongest will head out to the lime trees, while three thousand younger ones will go to gather nectar from the white clover. Those who were getting nectar from the blossoms yesterday will take a break today and collect red pollen from the mignonette or yellow pollen from the tall lilies; you will never see a bee collecting or mixing pollen of different colors or types. In fact, one of the main concerns of the hive is the orderly storage of these pollens, organized by their origin and color. This is how the hidden intelligence issues its commands. The workers then swarm out in long black lines, each one flying straight to its designated task. "The bees," says De Layens, "seem to be fully aware of the location, the relative nectar-gathering value, and the distance of every flowering plant within a certain range from the hive."

"If we carefully note the different directions in which these foragers fly, and observe in detail the harvest they gather from the various plants around, we shall find that the workers distribute themselves over the flowers in proportion not only to the numbers of flowers of one species, but also to their melliferous value. Nay, more—they make daily calculations as to the means of obtaining the greatest possible wealth of saccharine liquid. In the spring, for instance, after the willows have bloomed, when the fields still are bare, and the first flowers of the woods are the one resource of the bees, we shall see them eagerly visiting gorse and violets, lungworts and anemones. But, a few days later, when fields of cabbage and colza begin to flower in sufficient abundance, we shall find that the bees will almost entirely forsake the plants in the woods, though these be still in full blossom, and will confine their visits to the flowers of cabbage and colza alone. In this fashion they regulate, day by day, their distribution over the plants, so as to collect the greatest value of saccharine liquid in the least possible time.

"If we pay close attention to the different directions these foragers fly and carefully observe the nectar they gather from various plants around them, we’ll notice that the workers spread themselves over the flowers not only based on the number of flowers of each species but also on how much nectar they produce. What's more, they make daily calculations on how to get the most sugary liquid possible. For example, in the spring, after the willows have bloomed and the fields are still bare, the only resource for the bees is the first flowers of the woods. We will see them eagerly visiting gorse, violets, lungworts, and anemones. However, just a few days later, when fields of cabbage and canola begin to bloom in enough abundance, the bees will almost completely abandon the plants in the woods, even though they are still in full bloom, and will focus solely on the flowers of cabbage and canola. This way, they adjust their distribution over the plants each day to collect the most sugary liquid in the least time possible."

"It may fairly be claimed, therefore, for the colony of bees that, in its harvesting labours no less than in its internal economy, it is able to establish a rational distribution of the number of workers without ever disturbing the principle of the division of labour."

"It can be reasonably said, then, that the bee colony, in both its foraging efforts and its internal organization, is capable of creating a logical allocation of workers without ever disrupting the rule of division of labor."

{49}

{49}

But what have we to do, some will ask, with the intelligence of the bees? What concern is it of ours whether this be a little less or a little more? Why weigh, with such infinite care, a minute fragment of almost invisible matter, as though it were a fluid whereon depended the destiny of man? I hold, and exaggerate nothing, that our interest herein is of the most considerable. The discovery of a sign of true intellect outside ourselves procures us something of the emotion Robinson Crusoe felt when he saw the imprint of a human foot on the sandy beach of his island. We seem less solitary than we had believed. And indeed, in our endeavour to understand the intellect of the bees, we are studying in them that which is most precious in our own substance: an atom of the extraordinary matter which possesses, wherever it attach itself, the magnificent power of transfiguring blind necessity, of organising, embellishing, and multiplying life; and, most striking of all, of holding in suspense the obstinate force of death, and the mighty, irresponsible wave that wraps almost all that exists in an eternal unconsciousness.

But what do we have to do with the intelligence of bees, some might ask? What does it matter to us whether it's a little less or a little more? Why should we carefully weigh a tiny fragment of nearly invisible matter as if it were a substance that determined the fate of humanity? I believe, and I’m not exaggerating, that our interest in this is quite significant. Discovering a sign of true intelligence outside ourselves gives us a glimpse of the emotion Robinson Crusoe must have felt when he saw a human footprint on the sandy beach of his island. We feel less alone than we thought. In our effort to understand the intelligence of bees, we are examining in them what is most valuable in our own essence: a particle of extraordinary matter that, wherever it attaches, has the incredible ability to transform blind necessity, to organize, beautify, and enhance life; and, most impressively, to suspend the relentless force of death and the powerful, indifferent tide that envelops almost all that exists in eternal unconsciousness.

Were we sole possessors of the particle of matter that, when maintained in a special condition of flower or incandescence, we term the intellect, we should to some extent be entitled to look on ourselves as privileged beings, and to imagine that in us nature achieved some kind of aim; but here we discover, in the hymenoptera, an entire category of beings in whom a more or less identical aim is achieved. And this fact, though it decide nothing perhaps, still holds an honourable place in the mass of tiny facts that help to throw light on our position in this world. It affords even, if considered from a certain point of view, a fresh proof of the most enigmatic part of our being; for the superpositions of destinies that we find in the hive are surveyed by us from an eminence loftier than any we can attain for the contemplation of the destinies of man. There we see before us, in miniature, the large and simple lines that in our own disproportionate sphere we never have the occasion to disentangle and follow to the end. Spirit and matter are there, the race and the individual, evolution and permanence, life and death, the past and the future; all gathered together in a retreat that our hand can lift and one look of our eye embrace. And may we not reasonably ask ourselves whether the mere size of a body, and the room that it fills in time and space, can modify to the extent we imagine the secret idea of nature; the idea that we try to discover in the little history of the hive, which in a few days already is ancient, no less than in the great history of man, of whom three generations overlap a long century?

If we were the only ones who held the part of matter that, when kept in a special state of blooming or glowing, we call the intellect, we might feel justified in viewing ourselves as special beings and think that nature had achieved some sort of purpose through us. However, we find in the hymenoptera a whole category of beings that seem to achieve a similar goal. This observation, while it may not conclusively prove anything, still holds a respectable spot among the many small facts that help clarify our place in the world. From a certain perspective, it even offers new evidence regarding the most mysterious aspects of our existence; for the intertwining destinies we see in the hive are viewed from a height greater than any we can reach when contemplating human destinies. There, in miniature, we can observe the large and straightforward patterns that in our own vast sphere we never have the chance to untangle or follow through to completion. Spirit and matter, the species and the individual, evolution and stability, life and death, the past and the future; all gathered together in a space that our hand can lift and our gaze can encompass. And can we not reasonably question whether the sheer size of a body, and the space it occupies in time and place, can truly alter the secret intention of nature? The intention we seek to understand in the brief saga of the hive, which in just a few days is already old, is no less significant than the grand story of humanity, where three generations often overlap a century.

{50}

{50}

Let us go on, then, with the story of our hive; let us take it up where we left it; and raise, as high as we may, a fold of the festooned curtain in whose midst a strange sweat, white as snow and airier than the down of a wing, is beginning to break over the swarm. For the wax that is now being born is not like the wax that we know; it is immaculate, it has no weight; seeming truly to be the soul of the honey, that itself is the spirit of flowers. And this motionless incantation has called it forth that it may serve us, later—in memory of its origin, doubtless, wherein it is one with the azure sky, and heavy with perfumes of magnificence and purity—as the fragrant light of the last of our altars.

Let’s continue with the story of our hive; let’s pick up where we left off and lift, as high as we can, a section of the decorated curtain where a strange sweat, white as snow and lighter than a feather, is beginning to form over the swarm. The wax that is being created now isn’t like the wax we know; it’s pure, weightless, and seems to truly be the essence of honey, which itself embodies the spirit of flowers. This still enchantment has brought it forth so that it can serve us later—as a reminder of its origin, where it is one with the blue sky and filled with scents of beauty and purity—as the fragrant light for the last of our altars.

{51}

{51}

To follow the various phases of the secretion and employment of wax by a swarm that is beginning to build, is a matter of very great difficulty. All comes to pass in the blackest depths of the crowd, whose agglomeration, growing denser and denser, produces the temperature needful for this exudation, which is the privilege of the youngest bees. Huber, who was the first to study these phenomena, bringing incredible patience to bear and exposing himself at times to very serious danger, devotes to them more than two hundred and fifty pages; which, though of considerable interest, are necessarily somewhat confused. But I am not treating this subject technically; and while referring when necessary to Huber's admirable studies, I shall confine myself generally to relating what is patent to any one who may gather a swarm into a glass hive.

To track the different stages of wax secretion and use by a swarm that's just starting to build is quite challenging. Everything happens in the darkest parts of the crowd, whose increasing density creates the necessary warmth for this secretion, which only the youngest bees can produce. Huber, who was the first to explore these phenomena with remarkable patience and often putting himself in serious danger, dedicated over two hundred and fifty pages to them. While these pages are quite interesting, they are inevitably a bit confusing. However, I'm not addressing this topic in a technical way; while I will refer to Huber's excellent studies when needed, I will mainly focus on what anyone can observe when gathering a swarm into a glass hive.

We have to admit, first of all, that we know not yet by what process of alchemy the honey transforms itself into wax in the enigmatic bodies of our suspended bees. We can only say that they will remain thus suspended for a period extending from eighteen to twenty-four hours, in a temperature so high that one might almost believe that a fire was burning in the hollow of the hive; and then white and transparent scales will appear at the opening of four little pockets that every bee has underneath its abdomen.

We have to admit, first of all, that we still don’t know how exactly honey turns into wax in the mysterious bodies of our hanging bees. All we can say is that they’ll stay like this for about eighteen to twenty-four hours in a temperature so high that you could almost think there was a fire burning inside the hive; and then white and clear scales will appear at the opening of the four tiny pockets each bee has under its abdomen.

When the bodies of most of those who form the inverted cone have thus been adorned with ivory tablets, we shall see one of the bees, as though suddenly inspired, abruptly detach herself from the mass, and climb over the backs of the passive crowd till she reach the inner pinnacle of the cupola. To this she will fix herself solidly, dislodging, with repeated blows of her head, such of her neighbours as may seem to hamper her movements. Then, with her mouth and claws, she will seize one of the eight scales that hang from her abdomen, and at once proceed to clip it and plane it, extend it, knead it with her saliva, bend it and flatten it, roll it and straighten it, with the skill of a carpenter handling a pliable panel. When at last the substance, thus treated, appears to her to possess the required dimensions and consistency, she will attach it to the highest point of the dome, thus laying the first, or rather the keystone of the new town; for we have here an inverted city, hanging down from the sky, and not rising from the bosom of earth like a city of men.

When the bodies of most of those forming the inverted cone are adorned with ivory tablets, we will see one of the bees, as if suddenly inspired, break away from the group and climb over the backs of the passive crowd until she reaches the top of the dome. There, she will secure herself firmly, nudging away any neighboring bees that might get in her way. Then, using her mouth and claws, she will grab one of the eight scales hanging from her abdomen and immediately begin to clip, plane, stretch, knead it with her saliva, bend it, flatten it, roll it, and straighten it, like a carpenter working with a flexible panel. Once the material seems to have the right size and consistency, she will attach it to the highest point of the dome, effectively laying the first, or rather the keystone of the new town; for we have here an inverted city, hanging down from the sky, rather than rising from the earth like a city of humans.

To this keystone, depending in the void, she will add other fragments of wax that she takes in succession from beneath her rings of horn; and finally, with one last lick of the tongue, one last wave of antennae, she will go as suddenly as she came, and disappear in the crowd. Another will at once take her place, continue the work at the point where the first one has left it, add on her own, change and adjust whatever may seem to offend the ideal plan of the tribe, then vanish in her turn, to be succeeded by a third, a fourth, and a fifth, all appearing unexpectedly, suddenly, one after the other, none completing the work, but each bringing her share to the task in which all combine.

To this central piece, balancing in the emptiness, she will add other bits of wax that she takes one by one from under her horn rings; and finally, with one last lick of her tongue, one last wave of her antennae, she will leave as suddenly as she arrived and blend into the crowd. Another will immediately take her place, pick up the work from where the first left off, contribute her own, change and adjust whatever might not fit the tribe's perfect plan, then disappear in her turn, to be followed by a third, a fourth, and a fifth, all appearing unexpectedly, one right after the other, none finishing the job, but each adding her part to the collective effort.

{52}

{52}

A small block of wax, formless as yet, hangs down from the top of the vault. So soon as its thickness may be deemed sufficient, we shall see another bee emerge from the mass, her physical appearance differing appreciably from that of the foundresses who preceded her. And her manner displays such settled conviction, her movements are followed so eagerly by all the crowd, that we almost might fancy that some illustrious engineer had been summoned to trace in the void the site of the first cell of all, from which every other must mathematically depend. This bee belongs to the sculptor or carver class of workers; she produces no wax herself and is content to deal with the materials others provide. She locates the first cell, scoops into the block for an instant, lays the wax she has removed from the cavity on the borders around it; and then, like the foundresses, abruptly departs and abandons her model. Her place is taken at once by an impatient worker, who continues the task that a third will finish, while others close by are attacking the rest of the surface and the opposite side of the wall; each one obeying the general law of interrupted and successive labour, as though it were an inherent principle of the hive that the pride of toil should be distributed, and every achievement be anonymous and common to all, that it might thereby become more fraternal.

A small block of wax, still shapeless, hangs from the top of the vault. As soon as it’s thick enough, we’ll see another bee emerge from the mass, looking noticeably different from the founders before her. She carries herself with such confidence, and everyone watches her so intently, that it almost feels like a brilliant engineer has been called in to mark where the very first cell will go, which every other cell will rely on. This bee is part of the sculptor or carver group; she doesn’t produce wax herself and is happy to work with the materials supplied by others. She finds the spot for the first cell, quickly scoops out some wax, places the wax she removed around the edges, and then, like the founders, suddenly leaves her model. Immediately, an eager worker takes her place to continue the task that a third will finish, while others nearby tackle the rest of the surface and the other side of the wall. Each one follows the hive's principle of shared and interrupted labor, as if it’s a fundamental rule of the hive that the pride in work should be spread out and that every achievement should be shared and anonymous, making it more like a family effort.

{53}

{53}

The outline of the nascent comb may soon be divined. In form it will still be lenticular, for the little prismatic tubes that compose it are unequal in length, and diminish in proportion as they recede from the centre to the extremities. In thickness and appearance at present it more or less resembles a human tongue whose sides might be formed of hexagonal cells, contiguous, and placed back to back.

The shape of the developing comb might soon become clear. It will still be lens-shaped, since the small prismatic tubes that make it up vary in length and get thinner as they move away from the center to the edges. In terms of thickness and look, it currently somewhat resembles a human tongue, with its sides potentially made of hexagonal cells that are next to each other and arranged back to back.

The first cells having been built, the foundresses proceed to add a second block of wax to the roof; and so in gradation a third and a fourth. These blocks follow each other at regular intervals so nicely calculated that when, at a much later period, the comb shall be fully developed, there will be ample space for the bees to move between its parallel walls.

The first cells built, the founders add a second block of wax to the roof; and then, gradually, a third and a fourth. These blocks are arranged at regular intervals so perfectly timed that when, much later, the comb is fully developed, there will be plenty of space for the bees to move between its parallel walls.

Their plan must therefore embrace the final thickness of every comb, which will be from eighty-eight to ninety-two hundredths of an inch, and at the same time the width of the avenues between, which must be about half an inch, or in other words twice the height of a bee, since there must be room to pass back to back between the combs.

Their plan must therefore account for the final thickness of each comb, which will be between eighty-eight and ninety-two hundredths of an inch, and at the same time the width of the spaces in between, which should be about half an inch, or in other words twice the height of a bee, since there needs to be enough room to pass back to back between the combs.

The bees, however, are not infallible, nor does their certainty appear mechanical. They will commit grave errors at times, when circumstances present unusual difficulty. They will often leave too much space, or too little, between the combs. This they will remedy as best they can, either by giving an oblique twist to the comb that too nearly approaches the other, or by introducing an irregular comb into the gap. "The bees sometimes make mistakes," Reaumur remarks on this subject, "and herein we may find yet another fact which appears to prove that they reason."

The bees, however, aren't perfect, and their confidence doesn't seem automatic. They can make serious mistakes sometimes when faced with unusual challenges. They often leave either too much or too little space between the combs. They try to fix it in the best way they can, either by twisting a comb that’s too close to the other one or by placing an irregular comb in the gap. "The bees sometimes make mistakes," Reaumur points out about this, "and this might be another fact that suggests they can reason."

{54}

{54}

We know that the bees construct four kinds of cells. First of all, the royal cells, which are exceptional, and contrived somewhat in the shape of an acorn; then the large cells destined for the rearing of males and storing of provisions when flowers super-abound; and the small cells, serving as workers' cradles and ordinary store-rooms, which occupy normally about four-fifths of the built-over surface of the hive. And lastly, so as to connect in orderly fashion the larger cells with the small, the bees will erect a certain number of what are known as transition cells. These must of necessity be irregular in form; but so unerringly accurate are the dimensions of the second and third types that, at the time when the decimal system was established, and a fixed measure sought in nature to serve as a starting-point and an incontestable standard, it was proposed by Reaumur to select for this purpose the cell of the bee.*

We know that bees build four types of cells. First, there are the royal cells, which are unique and shaped somewhat like an acorn. Then, there are the large cells meant for raising males and storing food when there are plenty of flowers. Next, we have the small cells, which serve as cradles for workers and regular storage spaces, taking up about four-fifths of the hive's built area. Finally, to connect the larger cells to the small ones in a neat way, bees create a certain number of transition cells. These are necessarily irregular in shape, but the sizes of the second and third types are so precise that, when the decimal system was established and a fixed natural measurement was needed as a solid standard, it was suggested by Reaumur to use the bee cell for this purpose.*

     *It was as well, perhaps, that this standard was not
     adopted. For although the diameter of the cells is admirably
     regular, it is, like all things produced by a living
     organism, not mathematically invariable in the same hive.
     Further, as M. Maurice Girard has pointed out, the apothem
     of the cell varies among different races of bees, so that
     the standard would alter from hive to hive, according to the
     species of bee that inhabited it.
     *It might have been a good thing that this standard wasn’t adopted. Even though the diameter of the cells is impressively consistent, it isn’t mathematically fixed within the same hive, just like everything created by a living organism. Additionally, as M. Maurice Girard noted, the apothem of the cell differs among various bee species, meaning the standard would change from hive to hive depending on the type of bee living in it.

Each of the cells is an hexagonal tube placed on a pyramidal base; and two layers of these tubes form the comb, their bases being opposed to each other in such fashion that each of the three rhombs or lozenges which on one side constitute the pyramidal base of one cell, composes at the same time the pyramidal base of three cells on the other. It is in these prismatic tubes that the honey is stored; and to prevent its escaping during the period of maturation,—which would infallibly happen if the tubes were as strictly horizontal as they appear to be,—the bees incline them slightly, to an angle of 4 deg or 5 deg.

Each of the cells is a hexagonal tube sitting on a pyramidal base; and two layers of these tubes create the comb, with their bases facing each other in a way that each of the three rhombs or lozenges that make up the pyramidal base of one cell also forms the pyramidal base of three cells on the other side. It's in these prismatic tubes that the honey is stored; and to keep it from leaking out during the maturation period—which would definitely happen if the tubes were as perfectly horizontal as they seem—they tilt them slightly at an angle of 4 or 5 degrees.

"Besides the economy of wax," says Reaumur, when considering this marvellous construction in its entirety, "besides the economy of wax that results from the disposition of the cells, and the fact that this arrangement allows the bees to fill the comb without leaving a single spot vacant, there are other advantages also with respect to the solidity of the work. The angle at the base of each cell, the apex of the pyramidal cavity, is buttressed by the ridge formed by two faces of the hexagon of another cell. The two triangles, or extensions of the hexagon faces which fill one of the convergent angles of the cavity enclosed by the three rhombs, form by their junction a plane angle on the side they touch; each of these angles, concave within the cell, supports, on its convex side, one of the sheets employed to form the hexagon of another cell; the sheet, pressing on this angle, resists the force which is tending to push it outwards; and in this fashion the angles are strengthened. Every advantage that could be desired with regard to the solidity of each cell is procured by its own formation and its position with reference to the others."

"Besides the efficiency of wax," Reaumur says when looking at this amazing structure as a whole, "aside from the efficiency of wax due to the arrangement of the cells, which enables the bees to fill the comb without leaving any empty spots, there are also other benefits concerning the strength of the work. The angle at the base of each cell, the tip of the pyramid-shaped cavity, is supported by the ridge created by the two sides of the hexagon of another cell. The two triangles, or extensions of the hexagon sides that fill one of the converging angles of the cavity enclosed by the three rhombs, create a flat angle where they touch; each of these angles, concave inside the cell, supports, on its outer side, one of the walls forming the hexagon of another cell; the wall, pressing against this angle, withstands the force trying to push it outward; and in this way, the angles are reinforced. Every advantage that could be desired regarding the strength of each cell is achieved by its own shape and its position relative to the others."

{55}

{55}

"There are only," says Dr. Reid, "three possible figures of the cells which can make them all equal and similar, without any useless interstices. These are the equilateral triangle, the square, and the regular hexagon. Mathematicians know that there is not a fourth way possible in which a plane shall be cut into little spaces that shall be equal, similar, and regular, without useless spaces. Of the three figures, the hexagon is the most proper for convenience and strength. Bees, as if they knew this, make their cells regular hexagons.

"There are only," says Dr. Reid, "three possible shapes for the cells that can make them all equal and similar, without any unnecessary gaps. These shapes are the equilateral triangle, the square, and the regular hexagon. Mathematicians know that there’s no fourth way to divide a plane into little spaces that are equal, similar, and regular, without leaving any gaps. Of the three shapes, the hexagon is the best for efficiency and strength. Bees, as if they understand this, create their cells in the shape of regular hexagons."

"Again, it has been demonstrated that, by making the bottoms of the cells to consist of three planes meeting in a point, there is a saving of material and labour in no way inconsiderable. The bees, as if acquainted with these principles of solid geometry, follow them most accurately. It is a curious mathematical problem at what precise angle the three planes which compose the bottom of a cell ought to meet, in order to make the greatest possible saving, or the least expense of material and labour.* This is one of the problems which belong to the higher parts of mathematics. It has accordingly been resolved by some mathematicians, particularly by the ingenious Maclaurin, by a fluctionary calculation which is to be found in the Transactions of the Royal Society of London. He has determined precisely the angle required, and he found, by the most exact mensuration the subject would admit, that it is the very angle in which the three planes at the bottom of the cell of a honey comb do actually meet."

"Once again, it's been shown that by designing the bottoms of the cells to consist of three planes meeting at a point, there's a significant saving in both materials and labor. The bees, almost as if they understand these principles of solid geometry, follow them very precisely. It's a fascinating mathematical problem to determine the exact angle at which the three planes that form the bottom of a cell should meet to achieve the greatest material and labor savings. This is one of the challenges that falls into advanced mathematics. Some mathematicians, notably the clever Maclaurin, have solved it through a complex calculation published in the Transactions of the Royal Society of London. He pinpointed the precise angle required and discovered, through the most accurate measurements possible for this subject, that it matches the exact angle at which the three planes at the bottom of a honeycomb cell actually meet."

     *Reaumur suggested the following problem to the celebrated
     mathematician Koenig: "Of all possible hexagonal cells with
     pyramidal base composed of three equal and similar rhombs,
     to find the one whose construction would need the least
     material." Koenig's answer was, the cell that had for its
     base three rhombs whose large angle was 109 deg 26', and the
     small 70 deg 34'. Another savant, Maraldi, had measured as
     exactly as possible the angles of the rhombs constructed by
     the bees, and discovered the larger to be 109 deg 28', and
     the other 70 deg 32'. Between the two solutions there was a
     difference, therefore, of only 2'. It is probable that the
     error, if error there be, should be attributed to Maraldi
     rather than to the bees; for it is impossible for any
     instrument to measure the angles of the cells, which are not
     very clearly defined, with infallible precision.
     *Reaumur presented the following question to the famous mathematician Koenig: "Out of all possible hexagonal cells with a pyramidal base made of three equal and similar rhombs, which one would require the least amount of material?" Koenig replied that the optimal cell would have a base of three rhombs with a large angle of 109 degrees 26 minutes and a small angle of 70 degrees 34 minutes. Another scholar, Maraldi, accurately measured the angles of the rhombs built by bees and found the larger angle to be 109 degrees 28 minutes and the smaller to be 70 degrees 32 minutes. Therefore, there was only a 2-minute difference between the two solutions. It's likely that any error, if there is one, is more likely to be Maraldi's than the bees'; it's almost impossible for any instrument to measure the angles of the cells, which are not very clearly defined, with absolute precision.

The problem suggested to Koenig was put to another mathematician, Cramer, whose solution came even closer to that of the bees, viz., 109 deg 28 1/2' for the large angle, and 70 deg 31 1/2' for the small.

The problem presented to Koenig was given to another mathematician, Cramer, whose solution was even closer to the bees', specifically, 109 degrees 28.5 minutes for the large angle and 70 degrees 31.5 minutes for the small.

{56}

{56}

I myself do not believe that the bees indulge in these abstruse calculations; but, on the other hand, it seems equally impossible to me that such astounding results can be due to chance alone, or to the mere force of circumstance. The wasps, for instance, also build combs with hexagonal cells, so that for them the problem was identical, and they have solved it in a far less ingenious fashion. Their combs have only one layer of cells, thus lacking the common base that serves the bees for their two opposite layers. The wasps' comb, therefore, is not only less regular, but also less substantial; and so wastefully constructed that, besides loss of material, they must sacrifice about a third of the available space and a quarter of the energy they put forth. Again, we find that the trigonae and meliponae, which are veritable and domesticated bees, though of less advanced civilisation, erect only one row of rearing-cells, and support their horizontal, superposed combs on shapeless and costly columns of wax. Their provision-cells are merely great pots, gathered together without any order; and, at the point between the spheres where these might have intersected and induced a profitable economy of space and material, the meliponae clumsily insert a section of cells with flat walls. Indeed, to compare one of their nests with the mathematical cities of our own honey-flies, is like imagining a hamlet composed of primitive huts side by side with a modern town; whose ruthless regularity is the logical, though perhaps somewhat charmless, result of the genius of man, that to-day, more fiercely than ever before, seeks to conquer space, matter, and time.

I personally don’t think the bees engage in complex math; however, it also seems impossible to me that such incredible results could just be a coincidence or purely the result of circumstances. Wasps, for example, build combs with hexagonal cells too, so their challenge is the same, but they solve it in a much less clever way. Their combs only have one layer of cells, missing the common base that allows bees to create two interlocking layers. As a result, the wasps’ combs are not only less organized but also less durable, constructed so wastefully that they lose material and must give up about a third of the space and a quarter of the energy they put into it. Similarly, we see that the trigonae and meliponae, which are true domesticated bees but less developed, only build one row of brood cells and support their flat, stacked combs on awkward and expensive wax columns. Their storage cells are just large pots randomly grouped together; and at the point where these could have neatly intersected to maximize space and materials, the meliponae clumsily add a section of cells with flat walls. In fact, comparing one of their nests to the mathematically organized cities of our honeybees is like picturing a small village made of simple huts next to a modern city; the latter’s harsh uniformity is the logical, albeit somewhat unappealing, outcome of human ingenuity, which today, more than ever, strives to dominate space, materials, and time.

{57}

{57}

There is a theory, originally propounded by Buffon and now revived, which assumes that the bees have not the least intention of constructing hexagons with a pyramidal base, but that their desire is merely to contrive round cells in the wax; only, that as their neighbours, and those at work on the opposite side of the comb, are digging at the same moment and with the same intentions, the points where the cells meet must of necessity become hexagonal. Besides, it is said, this is precisely what happens to crystals, the scales of certain kinds of fish, soap-bubbles, etc., as it happens in the following experiment that Buffon suggested. "If," he said, "you fill a dish with peas or any other cylindrical bean, pour as much water into it as the space between the beans will allow, close it carefully and then boil the water, you will find that all these cylinders have become six-sided columns. And the reason is evident, being indeed purely mechanical; each of the cylindrical beans tends, as it swells, to occupy the utmost possible space within a given space; wherefore it follows that the reciprocal compression compels them all to become hexagonal. Similarly each bee seeks to occupy the utmost possible space within a given space, with the necessary result that, its body being cylindrical, the cells become hexagonal for the same reason as before, viz., the working of reciprocal obstacles."

There’s a theory, originally proposed by Buffon and recently revived, which suggests that bees don’t actually intend to create hexagons with a pyramidal base. Instead, their goal is simply to make round cells in the wax. However, since their neighbors and those working on the opposite side of the comb are digging at the same time with the same goal, the points where the cells meet naturally end up being hexagonal. Moreover, it’s said that this is exactly what happens with crystals, the scales of certain fish, soap bubbles, and so on, as demonstrated in an experiment proposed by Buffon. “If,” he said, “you fill a dish with peas or any other cylindrical beans, add water until it fills the spaces between the beans, seal it carefully, and then boil the water, you'll find that all these cylinders turn into six-sided columns. The reason is clear and purely mechanical; each cylindrical bean, as it swells, tries to take up as much space as possible within the available area. Therefore, the mutual compression forces them all to become hexagonal. Similarly, each bee tries to occupy the maximum possible space within a certain area, resulting in hexagonal cells for the same reason—due to the influence of reciprocal obstacles.”

{58}

{58}

These reciprocal obstacles, it would seem, are capable of marvellous achievement; on the same principle, doubtless, that the vices of man produce a general virtue, whereby the human race, hateful often in its individuals, ceases to be so in the mass. We might reply, first of all, with Brougham, Kirby and Spence, and others, that experiments with peas and soap-bubbles prove nothing; for the reason that in both cases the pressure produces only irregular forms, and in no wise explains the existence of the prismatic base of the cells. But above all we might answer that there are more ways than one of dealing with rigid necessity; that the wasp, the humble-bee, the trigonae and meliponae of Mexico and Brazil achieve very different and manifestly inferior results, although the circumstances, and their own intentions, are absolutely identical with those of the bees. It might further be urged that if the bee's cell does indeed follow the law that governs crystals, snow, soap-bubbles, as well as Buffon's boiled peas, it also, through its general symmetry, disposition in opposite layers, and angle of inclination, obeys many other laws that are not to be found in matter. May we not say, too, of man that all his genius is comprised in his fashion of handling kindred necessities? And if it appear to us that his manner of treating these is the best there can possibly be, the reason only can lie in the absence of a judge superior to ourselves. But it is well that argument should make way for fact; and indeed, to the objection based on an experiment, the best reply of all must be a counter-experiment.

These mutual obstacles seem to have the potential for amazing accomplishments; probably based on the idea that human flaws can lead to a collective good, making humanity, often unlikable in individuals, more admirable as a whole. We could first argue, like Brougham, Kirby, Spence, and others, that tests with peas and soap bubbles don't prove anything because, in both cases, the pressure leads to irregular shapes and doesn't clarify how the prismatic base of the cells exists. More importantly, we could say there are various ways to handle strict necessity; the wasp, the bumblebee, and the trigonae and meliponae in Mexico and Brazil achieve very different and clearly lesser outcomes, despite having identical circumstances and intentions to the bees. It could also be noted that if the bee's cell does follow the rules that govern crystals, snow, and soap bubbles, as well as Buffon's boiled peas, it also adheres to many other laws that don't exist in physical matter, thanks to its overall symmetry, arrangement in opposing layers, and angle of inclination. Can we not also say that all of humanity's creativity is found in how it addresses similar necessities? And if we believe that this method is the very best possible, the reason for that must simply be that there isn't a higher judge than ourselves. However, it’s important that argument yields to facts, and to any objection based on experiments, the strongest response must be a counter-experiment.

In order to satisfy myself that hexagonal architecture truly was written in the spirit of the bee, I cut off and removed one day a disc of the size of a five-franc piece from the centre of a comb, at a spot where there were both brood-cells and cells full of honey. I cut into the circumference of this disc, at the intersecting point of the pyramidal cells; inserted a piece of tin on the base of one of these sections, shaped exactly to its dimensions, and possessed of resistance sufficient to prevent the bees from bending or twisting it. Then I replaced the slice of comb, duly furnished with its slab of tin, on the spot whence I had removed it; so that, while one side of the comb presented no abnormal feature, the damage having been repaired, the other displayed a sort of deep cavity, covering the space of about thirty cells, with the piece of tin as its base. The bees were disconcerted at first; they flocked in numbers to inspect and examine this curious chasm; day after day they wandered agitatedly to and fro, apparently unable to form a decision. But, as I fed them copiously every evening, there came a moment when they had no more cells available for the storage of provisions. Thereupon they probably summoned their great engineers, distinguished sculptors, and wax-workers, and invited them to turn this useless cavity to profitable account.

To make sure that hexagonal architecture was really designed in the spirit of bees, one day I cut out a disc the size of a five-franc coin from the center of a honeycomb, where there were both brood cells and cells filled with honey. I cut around the edge of the disc, where the pyramidal cells met; inserted a piece of tin at the base of one of these sections, shaped perfectly to fit, and strong enough to stop the bees from bending or twisting it. Then I put the slice of comb, now with its tin slab, back in the spot I had taken it from; so that one side of the comb looked normal since the damage was fixed, while the other had a deep cavity covering about thirty cells, with the piece of tin as its base. The bees were puzzled at first; they gathered in large numbers to check out this strange hole. Day by day, they wandered back and forth, clearly unable to decide what to do. But, since I fed them well every evening, there came a time when they had no more cells left for storing food. At that point, they likely called upon their top engineers, talented sculptors, and wax workers to help turn this empty space into something useful.

The wax-makers having gathered around and formed themselves into a dense festoon, so that the necessary heat might be maintained, other bees descended into the hole and proceeded solidly to attach the metal, and connect it with the walls of adjacent cells, by means of little waxen hooks which they distributed regularly over its surface. In the upper semicircle of the disc they then began to construct three or four cells, uniting these to the hooks. Each of these transition, or accommodation, cells was more or less deformed at the top, to allow of its being soldered to the adjoining cell on the comb; but its lower portion already designed on the tin three very clear angles, whence there ran three little straight lines that correctly indicated the first half of the following cell.

The wax-makers gathered around and formed a tight group to keep the necessary heat up. Meanwhile, other bees descended into the hole and firmly attached the metal, connecting it to the walls of nearby cells with little wax hooks that they evenly distributed over the surface. In the upper semicircle of the disc, they started constructing three or four cells, linking these to the hooks. Each of these transition, or accommodation, cells was somewhat misshapen at the top to allow it to be joined to the adjoining cell on the comb, but its lower part was already showing three clear angles, from which three straight lines indicated the beginning of the next cell.

After forty-eight hours, and notwithstanding the fact that only three bees at a time were able to work in the cavity, the entire surface of the tin was covered with outlined cells. These were less regular, certainly, than those of an ordinary comb; wherefore the queen, having inspected them, wisely declined to lay any eggs there, for the generation that would have arisen therefrom would necessarily have been deformed. Each cell, however, was a perfect hexagon; nor did it contain a single crooked line, a single curved figure or angle. And yet the ordinary conditions had all been changed; the cells had neither been scooped out of a block, according to Huber's description, nor had they been designed within a waxen hood, and, from being circular at first, been subsequently converted into hexagons by the pressure of adjoining cells, as explained by Darwin. Neither could there be question here of reciprocal obstacles, the cells having been formed one by one, and their first lines traced on what practically was a bare table. It would seem incontestable, therefore, that the hexagon is not merely the result of mechanical necessities, but that it has its true place in the plans, the experience, the intellect and will of the bee. I may relate here another curious instance of the workers' sagacity: the cells they built on the tin had no other base than the metal itself. The engineers of the corps had evidently decided that the tin could adequately retain the honey; and had considered that, the substance being impermeable, they need not waste the material they value so highly by covering the metal with a layer of wax. But, a short time after, some drops of honey having been placed in two of these cells, the bees discovered, in tasting it, that the contact of the metal had a deteriorating effect. Thereupon they reconsidered the matter, and covered over with wax the entire surface of the tin.

After forty-eight hours, and despite the fact that only three bees at a time could work in the space, the entire surface of the tin was covered with outlined cells. These were certainly less regular than those of a typical comb; therefore, the queen, after inspecting them, wisely chose not to lay any eggs there because the generation that would have come from them would have been deformed. Each cell, however, was a perfect hexagon; not a single crooked line or curved figure or angle was present. Yet, all the usual conditions had changed; the cells had neither been scooped from a block, as Huber described, nor had they been created inside a wax cover and then transformed from circular shapes into hexagons by the pressure of neighboring cells, as Darwin explained. There was also no issue of reciprocal obstacles since the cells were formed one by one, their initial outlines traced on what was practically a bare surface. It seems indisputable, therefore, that the hexagon is not just a result of mechanical necessities, but that it has its true place in the plans, experience, intellect, and intention of the bee. I can share another interesting example of the workers’ intelligence: the cells they built on the tin had no other base than the metal itself. The engineers of the group clearly decided that the tin could hold the honey well enough; and figured that since the material was impermeable, they didn’t need to waste the valuable wax by covering the metal. However, shortly after, when some drops of honey were placed in two of these cells, the bees tasted it and realized that the metal was negatively affecting it. So, they reconsidered and coated the entire surface of the tin with wax.

{59}

{59}

Were it our desire to throw light upon all the secrets of this geometric architecture, we should have more than one curious question still to consider; as for instance the shape of the first cells, which, being attached to the roof, are modified in such a manner as to touch the roof at the greatest possible number of points.

Were we eager to uncover all the secrets of this geometric architecture, we would still have several intriguing questions to explore; for instance, the shape of the first cells, which are connected to the roof and are designed to touch the roof at as many points as possible.

The design of the principal thoroughfares is determined by the parallelism of the combs; but we must admire the ingenious construction of alleys and gangways through and around the comb, so skilfully contrived as to provide short cuts in every direction and prevent congestion of traffic, while ensuring free circulation of air. And finally we should have to study the construction of transition cells, wherein we see a unanimous instinct at work that impels the bees at a given moment to increase the size of their dwellings. Three reasons may dictate this step: an extraordinary harvest may call for larger receptacles, the workers may consider the population to be sufficiently numerous, or it may have become necessary that males should be born. Nor can we in such cases refrain from wondering at the ingenious economy, the unerring, harmonious conviction, with which the bees will pass from the small to the large, from the large to the small; from perfect symmetry to, where unavoidable, its very reverse, returning to ideal regularity so soon as the laws of a live geometry will allow; and all the time not losing a cell, not suffering a single one of their numerous structures to be sacrificed, to be ridiculous, uncertain, or barbarous, or any section thereof to become unfit for use. But I fear that I have already wandered into many details that will have but slender interest for the reader, whose eyes perhaps may never have followed a flight of bees; or who may have regarded them only with the passing interest with which we are all of us apt to regard the flower, the bird or the precious stone, asking of these no more than a slight superficial assurance, and forgetting that the most trivial secret of the non-human object we behold in nature connects more closely perhaps with the profound enigma of our origin and our end, than the secret of those of our passions that we study the most eagerly and the most passionately.

The layout of the main roads is shaped by the alignment of the combs; however, we must appreciate the clever design of the alleys and pathways that wind through and around the comb, skillfully created to provide shortcuts in every direction and prevent traffic jams while allowing air to flow freely. Lastly, we need to examine how transition cells are built, where we see a collective instinct that drives the bees to expand their living space at certain times. Three reasons might lead to this decision: an abundant harvest may require larger storage, the workers might feel the population has grown enough, or it might be essential for males to be born. We can’t help but marvel at the bees' ingenious efficiency and the precise, harmonious way they transition from small cells to larger ones and back again; moving from perfect symmetry to, when necessary, its opposite, and returning to ideal regularity as soon as possible. All the while, they manage to retain every cell, ensuring none of their many structures are wasted, become pointless, uncertain, or chaotic, nor that any part becomes unusable. But I worry that I may have delved into too many details that may not interest the reader, who perhaps has never closely followed a swarm of bees, or who may regard them only with the fleeting curiosity with which we tend to view a flower, a bird, or a gemstone, seeking only a superficial assurance, and forgetting that even the simplest secret of a non-human thing we observe in nature might connect more deeply with the profound mystery of our beginnings and our endings than the secrets of our passions, which we study with the most eagerness and intensity.

{60}

{60}

And I will pass over too—in my desire that this essay shall not become too didactic—the remarkable instinct that induces the bees at times to thin and demolish the extremity of their combs, when these are to be enlarged or lengthened; though it must be admitted that in this case the "blind building instinct" fails signally to account for their demolishing in order that they may rebuild, or undoing what has been done that it may be done afresh, and with more regularity. I will content myself also with a mere reference to the remarkable experiment that enables us, with the aid of a piece of glass, to compel the bees to start their combs at a right angle; when they most ingeniously contrive that the enlarged cells on the convex side shall coincide with the reduced cells on the concave side of the comb.

And I will also move on—out of my wish for this essay not to be too preachy—from the amazing instinct that sometimes drives bees to thin and tear down the ends of their honeycombs when they need to be expanded or extended; although it must be acknowledged that in this situation the "blind building instinct" clearly doesn't explain why they dismantle to rebuild, or undo what has been created so they can do it again, and more neatly this time. I will also limit myself to just mentioning the fascinating experiment that shows us, with the help of a piece of glass, how we can make the bees start their honeycombs at a right angle; and they cleverly manage to make the expanded cells on the outside match up with the smaller cells on the inside of the comb.

But before finally quitting this subject let us pause, though it be but for an instant, and consider the mysterious fashion in which they manage to act in concert and combine their labour, when simultaneously carving two opposite sides of a comb, and unable therefore to see each other. Take a finished comb to the light, fix your eyes on the diaphanous wax; you will see, most clearly designed, an entire network of sharply cut prisms, a whole system of concordances so infallible that one might almost believe them to be stamped on steel.

But before we move on from this topic, let's take a moment, even if just for a second, to think about the mysterious way they manage to work together and combine their efforts when they’re carving opposite sides of a comb, unable to see one another. Hold a finished comb up to the light and look closely at the clear wax; you’ll see a complete network of sharply cut prisms, a whole system of such perfect alignment that you might almost think it was stamped in steel.

I wonder whether those who never have seen the interior of a hive can form an adequate conception of the arrangement and aspect of the combs. Let them imagine—we will take a peasant's hive, where the bee is left entirely to its own resources—let them imagine a dome of straw or osier, divided from top to bottom by five, six, eight, sometimes ten, strips of wax, resembling somewhat great slices of bread, that run in strictly parallel lines from the top of the dome to the floor, espousing closely the shape of the ovoid walls. Between these strips is contrived a space of about half an inch, to enable the bees to stand and to pass each other. At the moment when they begin to construct one of these strips at the top of the hive, the waxen wall (which is its rough model, and will later be thinned and extended) is still very thick, and completely excludes the fifty or sixty bees at work on its inner face from the fifty or sixty simultaneously engaged in carving the outer, so that it is wholly impossible for one group to see the other, unless indeed their sight be able to penetrate opaque matter. And yet there is not a hole that is scooped on the inner surface, not a fragment of wax that is added, but corresponds with mathematical precision to a protuberance or cavity on the outer surface, and vice versa. How does this happen? How is it that one does not dig too deep, another not deep enough? Whence the invariable magical coincidence between the angles of the lozenges? What is it tells the bees that at this point they must begin, and at that point stop? Once again we must content ourselves with the reply, that is no reply: "It is a mystery of the hive."

I wonder if people who have never seen inside a hive can really understand how the combs are arranged and what they look like. Let’s picture a peasant's hive, where the bees are completely left to their own devices. Imagine a dome made of straw or willow, divided from top to bottom by five, six, eight, or even ten strips of wax. These strips look a bit like large slices of bread, running in perfectly parallel lines from the top of the dome to the bottom, closely following the shape of the oval walls. Between these strips, there’s about half an inch of space, allowing the bees to stand and pass each other. When they start to build one of these strips at the top of the hive, the wax wall (which is just the rough version and will later be thinned out and expanded) is still very thick, completely separating the fifty or sixty bees working on the inner side from the fifty or sixty busy on the outer side. This makes it impossible for one group to see the other, unless they can see through solid matter. And yet, not a single hole is made on the inner surface, and not a piece of wax is added that doesn’t match up with something on the outer surface, and vice versa. How does this happen? How do they know not to dig too deep or too shallow? What explains the perfect alignment of the angles? What tells the bees when to start at one point and stop at another? Once again, we are left with an answer that isn’t really an answer: “It’s a mystery of the hive.”

Huber has sought to explain this mystery by suggesting that the pressure of the bees' hooks and teeth may possibly produce slight projections, at regular intervals, on the opposite side of the comb; or that they may be able to estimate the thickness of the block by the flexibility, elasticity, or some other physical quality of the wax; or again, that their antennae, which seem so well adapted for the questioning of the finer, less evident side of things, may serve as a compass in the invisible; or, lastly, that the position of every cell may derive mathematically from the arrangement and dimensions of the cells on the first row, and thus dispense with the need for further measurement. But these explanations are evidently insufficient; the first are mere hypotheses that cannot be verified, the others do no more than transplant the mystery. And useful as it may be to transplant mystery as often as we possibly can, it were not wise to imagine that a mystery has ceased to be because we have shifted its home.

Huber has tried to explain this mystery by suggesting that the pressure from the bees' hooks and teeth might create slight bumps, at regular intervals, on the opposite side of the comb; or that they might gauge the thickness of the block by the flexibility, elasticity, or some other physical property of the wax; or again, that their antennae, which seem so well suited for exploring the finer, less obvious aspects of things, might act like a compass in the unseen; or finally, that the position of each cell may mathematically derive from the arrangement and size of the cells in the first row, eliminating the need for further measurement. But these explanations are clearly inadequate; the first ones are just hypotheses that can’t be confirmed, while the others merely shift the mystery elsewhere. And as useful as it may be to move mystery around whenever we can, it would be unwise to think that a mystery has disappeared just because we've moved it.

{61}

{61}

Now let us leave these dreary building grounds, this geometrical desert of cells. The combs have been started, and are becoming habitable. Though it be here the infinitely little that, without apparent hope, adds itself to the infinitely little; though our eye with its limited vision look and see nothing, the work of wax, halting neither by day nor by night, will advance with incredible quickness. The impatient queen already has more than once paced the stockades that gleam white in the darkness; and no sooner is the first row of dwellings complete than she takes possession with her escort of counsellors, guardians, or servants—for we know not whether she lead or be led, be venerated or supervised. When the spot has been reached that she, or her urgent advisers, may regard as favourable, she arches her back, bends forward, and introduces the extremity of her long spindle-shaped abdomen into one of the cells; the-little eager heads of her escort meanwhile forming a passionate circle around her, watching her with their enormous black eyes, supporting her, caressing her wings, and waving their feverish antennae as though to encourage, incite, or congratulate. You may easily discover the spot where the queen shall be found by the sort of starry cockade, or oval brooch perhaps of the imposing kind our grandmothers used to wear, of which she forms the central stone. And one may mention here the curious fact that the workers always avoid turning their back on the queen. No sooner has she approached a group than they will invariably arrange themselves so as to face her with eyes and antennae, and to walk backwards before her. It is a token of respect, or of solicitude, that, unlikely as it may seem, is nevertheless constant and general. But to return to the queen. During the slight spasm that visibly accompanies the emission of an egg, one of her daughters will often throw her arms round her and appear to be whispering to her, brow pressed to brow and mouth to mouth. But the queen, in no wise disturbed by this somewhat bold demonstration, takes her time, tranquilly, calmly, wholly absorbed by the mission that would seem amorous delight to her rather than labour. And after some seconds she will rise, very quietly, take a step back, execute a slight turn on herself, and proceed to the next cell, into which she will first, before introducing her abdomen, dip her head to make sure that all is in order and that she is not laying twice in the same cell; and in the meanwhile two or three of her escort will have plunged into the cell she has quitted to see whether the work be duly accomplished, and to care for, and tenderly house, the little bluish egg she has laid.

Now let's leave this dull building area, this geometric wasteland of cells. The combs have been started and are becoming livable. Even though it seems like the smallest things are adding up without any real hope, and our eyes can’t see much, the work of the bees, never stopping day or night, moves incredibly fast. The impatient queen has already walked around the white stockades more than once in the darkness; and as soon as the first row of homes is finished, she takes over with her entourage of advisers, guardians, or servants—we're not sure if she leads or is led, if she is revered or monitored. When she or her eager advisers find a spot they like, she arches her back, bends forward, and puts the tip of her long, spindle-shaped abdomen into one of the cells, while the eager heads of her escort form an excited circle around her, watching her with their huge black eyes, supporting her, stroking her wings, and waving their frenzied antennae as if to encourage, inspire, or congratulate her. You can easily spot where the queen is by the kind of starry rosette, or maybe an oval brooch, similar to the grand ones our grandmothers used to wear, with her at the center. Interestingly, the workers never turn their backs on the queen. As soon as she approaches a group, they always position themselves to face her with their eyes and antennae and walk backward in front of her. This shows respect or concern, which, however unlikely it may seem, is constant and universal. Back to the queen. During the brief spasm that visibly accompanies the laying of an egg, one of her daughters often wraps her arms around her and seems to be whispering to her, foreheads touching and mouths close. But the queen, undisturbed by this bold display, takes her time, calmly and completely focused on what seems to be a loving task rather than work. After a few seconds, she quietly steps back, turns slightly, and heads to the next cell, where she first dips her head to check everything is in order and that she isn’t laying in the same cell twice. Meanwhile, two or three of her escort will rush into the cell she's just left to check that everything is done properly and to gently take care of the little bluish egg she has laid.

From this moment, up to the first frosts of autumn, she does not cease laying; she lays while she is being fed, and even in her sleep, if indeed she sleeps at all, she still lays. She represents henceforth the devouring force of the future, which invades every corner of the kingdom. Step by step she pursues the unfortunate workers who are exhaustedly, feverishly erecting the cradles her fecundity demands. We have here the union of two mighty instincts; and their workings throw into light, though they leave unresolved, many an enigma of the hive.

From this moment until the first frosts of autumn, she doesn’t stop laying eggs; she lays while she’s being fed, and even in her sleep, if she even sleeps at all, she still lays. From now on, she embodies the unstoppable force of the future, which invades every corner of the kingdom. Step by step, she chases after the unfortunate workers who are exhaustively and feverishly building the cradles her productivity demands. We see here the union of two powerful instincts, and their processes shed light on, though they leave unresolved, many enigmas of the hive.

It will happen, for instance, that the workers will distance her, and acquire a certain start; whereupon, mindful of their duties as careful housewives to provide for the bad days ahead, they hasten to fill with honey the cells they have wrested from the avidity of the species. But the queen approaches; material wealth must give way to the scheme of nature; and the distracted workers are compelled with all speed to remove the importunate treasure.

It will happen, for example, that the workers will move away from her and get a certain boost; then, remembering their responsibilities as diligent housekeepers to prepare for tough times, they hurry to fill the cells they’ve taken from the greed of their kind. But the queen comes closer; material wealth has to make room for nature's plan; and the distracted workers are forced to quickly get rid of the unwanted treasure.

But assume them to be a whole comb ahead, and to have no longer before them her who stands for the tyranny of days they shall none of them see; we find then that they eagerly, hurriedly, build a zone of large cells, cells for males; whose construction is very much easier, and far more rapid. When the queen in her turn attains this unthankful zone, she will regretfully lay a few eggs there, then cease, pass beyond, and clamour for more workers' cells. Her daughters obey; little by little they reduce the cells; and then the pursuit starts afresh, till at last the insatiable mother shall have traversed the whole circumference of the hive, and have returned to the first cells. These, by this time, will be empty; for the first generation will have sprung into life, soon to go forth, from their shadowy corner of birth, disperse over the neighbouring blossoms, people the rays of the sun and quicken the smiling hours; and then sacrifice themselves in their turn to the new generations that are already filling their place in the cradles.

But let's say they have a whole bunch of time ahead of them, and no longer face the one who symbolizes the oppression of days they will never witness; we then see that they quickly and eagerly construct a series of large cells, cells for males, which are much easier and faster to build. When the queen eventually reaches this thankless zone, she will regretfully lay a few eggs there, then move on, demanding more workers’ cells. Her daughters comply; gradually, they reduce the cells, and then the cycle begins again, until finally, the never-satisfied mother has gone around the entire hive and returned to the first cells. By this time, those will be empty because the first generation will have emerged, soon to leave their quiet birthplace, scatter over the nearby flowers, fill the sunlight, and brighten the happy hours; and then sacrifice themselves in turn for the new generations that are already taking their place in the cradles.

{62}

{62}

And whom does the queen-bee obey? She is ruled by nourishment given her; for she does not take her own food, but is fed like a child by the very workers whom her fecundity harasses. And the food these workers deal out is nicely proportioned to the abundance of flowers, to the spoil brought back by those who visit the calyces. Here, then, as everywhere else in the world, one part of the circle is wrapped in darkness; here, as everywhere, it is from without, from an unknown power, that the supreme order issues; and the bees, like ourselves, obey the nameless lord of the wheel that incessantly turns on itself, and crushes the wills that have set it in motion.

And who does the queen bee listen to? She is controlled by the food provided to her; she doesn’t gather her own sustenance but is fed like a child by the very workers who benefit from her ability to reproduce. The food these workers provide is carefully matched to the number of flowers and the bounty brought back by those who visit the blooms. Here, like everywhere else in the world, one part of the cycle is shrouded in mystery; here, as anywhere, it comes from outside, from an unknown force, that the ultimate order emerges; and the bees, like us, follow the nameless master of the wheel that keeps turning endlessly, crushing the desires that set it in motion.

Some little time back, I conducted a friend to one of my hives of glass, and showed him the movements of this wheel, which was as readily perceptible as the great wheel of a clock; showed him, in all its bareness, the universal agitation on every comb, the perpetual, frantic, bewildered haste of the nurses around the brood-cells; the living gangways and ladders formed by the makers of wax, the abounding, unceasing activity of the entire population, and their pitiless, useless effort; the ardent, feverish coming and going of all, the general absence of sleep save in the cradles alone, around which continuous labour kept watch; the denial of even the repose of death in a home which permits no illness and accords no grave; and my friend, his astonishment over, soon turned his eyes away, and in them I could read the signs of I know not what saddened fear.

Some time ago, I took a friend to one of my glass hives and showed him the motion of this wheel, which was as clear as the big wheel of a clock. I revealed to him, in all its simplicity, the universal movement on every comb, the constant, frantic, confused rush of the nurses around the brood cells; the living pathways and ladders created by the wax makers, the never-ending activity of the entire population, and their relentless, pointless efforts; the eager, feverish coming and going of all, the general lack of sleep except in the cradles, around which continuous work kept watch; the absence of even the rest of death in a home that allows no sickness and offers no grave. My friend, after his astonishment wore off, soon turned his gaze away, and in his eyes, I could see the signs of an unknown, saddened fear.

And truly, underlying the gladness that we note first of all in the hive, underlying the dazzling memories of beautiful days that render it the storehouse of summer's most precious jewels, underlying the blissful journeys that knit it so close to the flowers and to running water, to the sky, to the peaceful abundance of all that makes for beauty and happiness—underlying all these exterior joys, there reposes a sadness as deep as the eye of man can behold. And we, who dimly gaze on these things with our own blind eyes, we know full well that it is not they alone that we are striving to see, not they alone that we cannot understand, but that before us there lies a pitiable form of the great power that quickens us also.

And really, beneath the joy that we first notice in the hive, beneath the stunning memories of beautiful days that make it a treasure chest of summer's most valuable gems, beneath the delightful journeys that connect it so closely to the flowers, to flowing water, to the sky, and to the peaceful richness of everything that brings beauty and happiness—beneath all these outward joys, there rests a sadness as deep as the human eye can see. And we, who vaguely observe these things with our own limited vision, know very well that it’s not just these things we are trying to understand, not just these things that remain unclear to us, but that before us exists a pitiful reflection of the great force that animates us too.

Sad let it be, as all things in nature are sad, when our eyes rest too closely upon them. And thus it ever shall be so long as we know not her secret, know not even whether secret truly there be. And should we discover some day that there is no secret, or that the secret is monstrous, other duties will then arise that, as yet, perhaps, have no name. Let our heart, if it will, in the meanwhile repeat, "It is sad;" but let our reason be content to add, "Thus it is." At the present hour the duty before us is to seek out that which perhaps may be hiding behind these sorrows; and, urged on by this endeavour, we must not turn our eyes away, but steadily, fixedly, watch these sorrows and study them, with a courage and interest as keen as though they were joys. It is right that before we judge nature, before we complain, we should at least ask every question that we can possibly ask.

It's sad, as everything in nature can be, when we focus on it too closely. And it will always be this way as long as we don't know its secret, or even whether there's a secret at all. If we ever find out that there isn't a secret, or that the secret is terrifying, then new responsibilities will come that we might not even have names for yet. For now, let our hearts say, "It is sad," but let our minds remind us, "That's just how it is." Right now, our task is to search for what might be hidden behind these sorrows; and driven by this goal, we should keep our eyes steady and watchful on these sorrows, studying them with as much courage and curiosity as if they were joys. It's important that before we judge nature or complain, we should try to ask every question we can.

{63}

{63}

We have seen that the workers, when free for the moment from the threatening fecundity of the queen, hasten to erect cells for provisions, whose construction is more economical and capacity greater. We have seen, too, that the queen prefers to lay in the smaller cells, for which she is incessantly clamouring. When these are wanting, however, or till they be provided, she resigns herself to laying her eggs in the large cells she finds on her road.

We’ve noticed that when the workers are temporarily away from the demanding reproduction of the queen, they rush to build storage cells that are more efficient and have a greater capacity. We’ve also observed that the queen prefers to lay her eggs in the smaller cells, which she constantly demands. However, when those aren’t available or until they are made, she settles for laying her eggs in the larger cells she comes across.

These eggs, though absolutely identical with those from which workers are hatched, will give birth to males, or drones. Now, conversely to what takes place when a worker is turned into queen, it is here neither the form nor the capacity of the cell that produces this change; for from an egg laid in a large cell and afterwards transferred to that of a worker (a most difficult operation, because of the microscopic minuteness and extreme fragility of the egg, but one that I have four or five times successfully accomplished) there will issue an undeniable male, though more or less atrophied. It follows, therefore, that the queen must possess the power, while laying, of knowing or determining the sex of the egg, and of adapting it to the cell over which she is bending. She will rarely make a mistake. How does she contrive, from among the myriad eggs her ovaries contain, to separate male from female, and lower them, at will, into the unique oviduct?

These eggs, while completely identical to those from which worker bees hatch, will produce males, or drones. Unlike when a worker is turned into a queen, the change here isn’t caused by the shape or size of the cell; for an egg laid in a large cell and then moved to a worker cell (a very tricky task because of the egg's tiny size and fragility, but I’ve successfully done it four or five times) will still result in a definite male, albeit somewhat underdeveloped. Thus, it appears that the queen has the ability, while laying, to identify or determine the sex of the egg and adjust it to the cell she’s working on. She rarely makes a mistake. How does she manage to separate male from female among the countless eggs in her ovaries and guide them, at will, into the single oviduct?

Here, yet again, there confronts us an enigma of the hive; and in this case one of the most unfathomable. We know that the virgin queen is not sterile; but the eggs that she lays will produce only males. It is not till after the impregnation of the nuptial flight that she can produce workers or drones at will. The nuptial flight places her permanently in possession, till death, of the spermatozoa torn from her unfortunate lover. These spermatozoa, whose number Dr. Leuckart estimates at twenty-five millions, are preserved alive in a special gland known as the spermatheca, that is situate under the ovaries, at the entrance to the common oviduct. It is imagined that the narrow aperture of the smaller cells, and the manner in which the form of this aperture compels the queen to bend forward, exercise a certain pressure upon the spermatheca, in consequence of which the spermatozoa spring forth and fecundate the egg as it passes. In the large cells this pressure would not take place, and the spermatheca would therefore not open. Others, again, believe that the queen has perfect control over the muscles that open and close the spermatheca on the vagina; and these muscles are certainly very numerous, complex, and powerful. For myself, I incline to the second of these hypotheses, though I do not for a moment pretend to decide which is the more correct; for indeed, the further we go and the more closely we study, the more plainly is it brought home to us that we merely are waifs shipwrecked on the ocean of nature; and ever and anon, from a sudden wave that shall be more transparent than others, there leaps forth a fact that in an instant confounds all we imagined we knew. But the reason of my preferring the second theory is that, for one thing, the experiments of a Bordeaux bee-keeper, M. Drory, have shown that in cases where all the large cells have been removed from the hive, the mother will not hesitate, when the moment for laying male eggs has come, to deposit these in workers' cells; and that, inversely, she will lay workers' eggs in cells provided for males, if she have no others at her disposal. And, further, we learn from the interesting observations of M. Fabre on the Osmiae, which are wild and olitary bees of the Gastrilegidae family, that not only does the Osmia know in advance the sex of the egg she will lay, but that this sex is "optional for the mother, who decides it in accordance with the space of which she disposes; this space being often governed by chance and not to be modified; and she will deposit a male egg here and a female there." I shall not enter into the details of the great French entomologist's experiments, for they are exceedingly minute, and would take us too far. But whichever be the hypothesis we prefer to accept, either will serve to explain the queen's inclination to lay her eggs in workers' cells, without it being necessary to credit her with the least concern for the future.

Once again, we face a puzzle of the hive, and this one is among the most baffling. We know that the virgin queen is not sterile, but the eggs she lays will only produce males. It isn’t until after her nuptial flight that she can lay workers or drones at will. The nuptial flight gives her permanent access, until her death, to the sperm taken from her unfortunate mate. Dr. Leuckart estimates that these sperm number around twenty-five million and are kept alive in a special gland called the spermatheca, located beneath the ovaries at the entrance to the common oviduct. It is believed that the narrow opening of the smaller cells, along with how this opening forces the queen to bend forward, creates pressure on the spermatheca, causing the sperm to spring forth and fertilize the egg as it passes. In larger cells, this pressure wouldn’t occur, so the spermatheca wouldn’t open. Others believe that the queen has complete control over the muscles that open and close the spermatheca in the vagina; these muscles are indeed numerous, complex, and strong. Personally, I tend to favor the second theory, though I don’t claim to decide which is correct; the more we investigate, the more evident it becomes that we are merely castaways adrift in the ocean of nature. Every so often, a sudden wave that is clearer than the rest reveals a fact that completely overturns what we thought we knew. The reason I prefer the second theory is that the experiments of a Bordeaux beekeeper, M. Drory, have shown that when all the large cells are removed from the hive, the queen will not hesitate to lay male eggs in workers' cells when the time comes, and conversely, she will lay workers' eggs in cells meant for males if she has no other options. Moreover, from the fascinating observations of M. Fabre on the Osmiae, wild solitary bees in the Gastrilegidae family, we learn that not only does the Osmia know in advance the sex of the egg she will lay, but this sex is "optional for the mother, who decides based on the space she has available; this space is often determined by chance and cannot be changed, leading her to lay a male egg here and a female egg there." I won't delve into the details of the great French entomologist’s experiments, as they are extremely detailed and would take us too far. However, whichever hypothesis we choose to accept can explain the queen’s tendency to lay her eggs in workers' cells without requiring us to believe she has any concern for the future.

It is not impossible that this slave-mother, whom we are inclined to pity, may be indeed a great amorist, a great voluptuary, deriving a certain enjoyment, an after-taste, as it were, of her one marriage-flight, from the union of the male and female principle that thus comes to pass in her being. Here again nature, never so ingenious, so cunningly prudent and diverse, as when contriving her snares of love, will not have failed to provide a certain pleasure as a bait in the interest of the species. And yet let us pause for a moment, and not become the dupes of our own explanation. For indeed, to attribute an idea of this kind to nature, and regard that as sufficient, is like flinging a stone into an unfathomable gulf we may find in the depths of a grotto, and imagining that the sounds it creates as it falls shall answer our every question, or reveal to us aught beside the immensity of the abyss.

It’s possible that this slave mother, whom we tend to feel sorry for, might actually be a passionate lover, someone who enjoys the experience of her one moment of marriage, deriving a certain pleasure from the connection of male and female that exists within her. Here again, nature, in her cleverness and unpredictability, when crafting her love traps, will likely have provided some pleasure as a lure for the sake of the species. However, let's take a moment to pause and not fall for our own reasoning. After all, attributing such an idea to nature and considering that explanation enough is like throwing a stone into an endless abyss in a cave, hoping that the sounds it makes as it falls will answer all our questions or reveal anything beyond the vastness of the void.

When we say to ourselves, "This thing is of nature's devising; she has ordained this marvel; those are her desires that we see before us!" the fact is merely that our special attention has been drawn to some tiny manifestation of life upon the boundless surface of matter that we deem inactive, and choose to describe, with evident inaccuracy, as nothingness and death. A purely fortuitous chain of events has allowed this special manifestation to attract our attention; but a thousand others, no less interesting, perhaps, and informed with no less intelligence, have vanished, not meeting with a like good-fortune, and have lost for ever the chance of exciting our wonder. It were rash to affirm aught beside; and all that remains, our reflections, our obstinate search for the final cause, our admiration and hopes—all these in truth are no more than our feeble cry as, in the depths of the unknown, we clash against what is more unknowable still; and this feeble cry declares the highest degree of individual existence attainable for us on this mute and impenetrable surface, even as the flight of the condor, the song of the nightingale, reveal to them the highest degree of existence their species allows. But the evocation of this feeble cry, whenever opportunity offers, is none the less one of our most unmistakable duties; nor should we let ourselves be discouraged by its apparent futility.

When we tell ourselves, "This is a creation of nature; she has made this wonder; those are her desires that we see before us!" the truth is that our focus has simply been drawn to a small expression of life on the vast surface of matter that we mistakenly think is inactive, describing it inaccurately as nothingness and death. A random series of events has allowed this particular expression to catch our attention; but a thousand others, just as fascinating and filled with just as much intelligence, have vanished without the same good fortune and lost the chance to amaze us forever. It would be unwise to claim anything different; and all that’s left—our thoughts, our stubborn quest for the ultimate reason, our admiration and hopes—are really just our weak attempt to make sense of the unknown as we grapple with something even more unknowable; and this weak attempt represents the highest level of individual existence we can achieve on this silent and impenetrable surface, just as the flight of the condor and the song of the nightingale symbolize the greatest existence their species can reach. Yet, calling upon this weak attempt whenever we have the chance is undeniably one of our clearest responsibilities; we shouldn’t let ourselves be discouraged by its seeming pointlessness.





V — THE YOUNG QUEENS

{64}

HERE let us close our hive, where we find that life is reassuming its circular movement, is extending and multiplying, to be again divided as soon as it shall attain the fulness of its happiness and strength; and let us for the last time reopen the mother-city, and see what is happening there after the departure of the swarm.

HERE let us close our hive, where we see that life is returning to its cycle, growing and spreading, only to be divided again as soon as it reaches the height of its joy and strength; and let us for the last time open up the mother-city and check what's going on there after the swarm has left.

The tumult having subsided, the hapless city, that two thirds of her children have abandoned for ever, becomes feeble, empty, moribund; like a body from which the blood has been drained. Some thousands of bees have remained, however; and these, though a trifle languid perhaps, are still immovably faithful to the duty a precise destiny has laid upon them, still conscious of the part that they have themselves to play; they resume their labours, therefore, fill as best they can the place of those who have gone, remove all trace of the orgy, carefully house the provisions that have escaped pillage, sally forth to the flowers again, and keep scrupulous guard over the hostages of the future.

The chaos has settled, and the unfortunate city, that two-thirds of its inhabitants have left for good, feels weak, empty, and lifeless—like a body that has lost all its blood. However, a few thousand bees remain; and while they may be a bit sluggish, they remain steadfast in their commitment to the role that fate has assigned to them, still aware of their responsibilities. They go back to work, trying their best to fill the void left by those who have departed, clearing away the remnants of the chaos, carefully storing the supplies that have survived the looting, venturing out to the flowers again, and keeping a vigilant watch over the future's potential.

And for all that the moment may appear gloomy, hope abounds wherever the eye may turn. We might be in one of the castles of German legend, whose walls are composed of myriad phials containing the souls of men about to be born. For we are in the abode of life that goes before life. On all sides, asleep in their closely sealed cradles, in this infinite superposition of marvellous six-sided cells, lie thousands of nymphs, whiter than milk, who with folded arms and head bent forward await the hour of awakening. In their uniform tombs, that, isolated, become nearly transparent, they seem almost like hoary gnomes, lost in deep thought, or legions of virgins whom the folds of the shroud have contorted, who are buried in hexagonal prisms that some inflexible geometrician has multiplied to the verge of delirium.

And even though the moment might seem bleak, there's hope everywhere you look. We could be in one of those legendary German castles, with walls made up of countless vials that hold the souls of babies about to be born. Because we are in the place of life that comes before life. All around us, asleep in their tightly sealed cradles, in this infinite arrangement of amazing six-sided cells, lie thousands of nymphs, whiter than milk, waiting with folded arms and bowed heads for the moment they wake up. In their uniform tombs, which, when isolated, seem almost transparent, they resemble ancient gnomes lost in deep thought, or legions of virgins whose shrouds have twisted them, buried in hexagonal shapes that some strict mathematician has multiplied to the limits of madness.

Over the entire area that the vertical walls enclose, and in the midst of this growing world that so soon shall transform itself, that shall four or five times in succession assume fresh vestments, and then spin its own winding-sheet in the shadow, hundreds of workers are dancing and flapping their wings. They appear thus to generate the necessary heat, and accomplish some other object besides that is still more obscure; for this dance of theirs contains some extraordinary movements, so methodically conceived that they must infallibly answer some purpose which no observer has as yet, I believe, been able to divine.

Over the entire area enclosed by the vertical walls, and in the midst of this thriving world that will soon change, that will don new forms four or five times in a row, then wrap itself in its own shroud in the shadows, hundreds of workers are dancing and flapping their wings. They seem to generate the necessary heat and achieve another goal that remains even more mysterious; for their dance features some remarkable movements, so deliberately designed that they definitely fulfill a purpose that, it seems, no observer has yet been able to understand.

A few days more, and the lids of these myriad urns—whereof a considerable hive will contain from sixty to eighty thousand—will break, and two large and earnest black eyes will appear, surmounted by antennae that already are groping at life, while active jaws are busily engaged in enlarging the opening from within. The nurses at once come running; they help the young bee to emerge from her prison, they clean her and brush her, and at the tip of their tongue present the first honey of the new life. But the bee, that has come from another world, is bewildered still, trembling and pale; she wears the feeble look of a little old man who might have escaped from his tomb, or perhaps of a traveller strewn with the powdery dust of the ways that lead unto life. She is perfect, however, from head to foot; she knows at once all that has to be known; and, like the children of the people, who learn, as it were, at their birth, that for them there shall never be time to play or to laugh, she instantly makes her way to the cells that are closed, and proceeds to beat her wings and to dance in cadence, so that she in her turn may quicken her buried sisters; nor does she for one instant pause to decipher the astounding enigma of her destiny, or her race.

A few days from now, the lids of these countless urns—each hive containing around sixty to eighty thousand—will break open, revealing two large, eager black eyes topped with antennae that are already reaching out for life, while busy jaws work to expand the exit from within. The nurse bees come running immediately; they help the young bee to break free from her confinement, clean her, and tidy her up, offering the first taste of honey from her new life on the tip of their tongues. But the bee, having emerged from another world, is still dazed, trembling, and pale; she has the fragile look of a little old man who just escaped from his grave, or perhaps of a traveler covered in the dusty remnants of the paths that lead to life. Yet, she is perfect from head to toe; she instinctively knows everything she needs to know; and, like children who, it seems, learn at birth that there will never be time for play or laughter, she immediately heads to the sealed cells and begins to flap her wings and dance in rhythm, eager to awaken her buried sisters; she doesn't pause for even a moment to contemplate the incredible mystery of her purpose or her lineage.

{65}

{65}

The most arduous labours will, however, at first be spared her. A week must elapse from the day of her birth before she will quit the hive; she will then perform her first "cleansing flight," and absorb the air into her tracheae, which, filling, expand her body, and proclaim her the bride of space. Thereupon she returns to the hive, and waits yet one week more; and then, with her sisters born the same day as herself, she will for the first time set forth to visit the flowers. A special emotion now will lay hold of her; one that French apiarists term the "soleil d'artifice," but which might more rightly perhaps be called the "sun of disquiet." For it is evident that the bees are afraid, that these daughters of the crowd, of secluded darkness, shrink from the vault of blue, from the infinite loneliness of the light; and their joy is halting, and woven of terror. They cross the threshold and pause; they depart, they return, twenty times. They hover aloft in the air, their head persistently turned to the home; they describe great soaring circles that suddenly sink beneath the weight of regret; and their thirteen thousand eyes will question, reflect, and retain the trees and the fountain, the gate and the walls, the neighbouring windows and houses, till at last the aerial course whereon their return shall glide have become as indelibly stamped in their memory as though it were marked in space by two lines of steel.

The hardest work will initially be kept from her. A week must pass from the day she’s born before she leaves the hive; then she will take her first "cleansing flight," filling her tracheae with air, which will expand her body and announce her as the bride of space. After that, she returns to the hive and waits one more week; then, with her sisters born on the same day, she will set out for the first time to visit the flowers. A special feeling will take hold of her; one that French beekeepers call the "soleil d'artifice," but it might be better described as the "sun of unease." It’s clear that the bees are afraid, that these daughters of the crowd, born in darkness, shy away from the blue sky and the endless loneliness of the light; their joy is hesitant and mixed with fear. They cross the threshold and pause; they leave, then return, twenty times. They hover in the air, their heads constantly turning back to home; they trace large soaring circles that suddenly drop under the weight of regret; and their thirteen thousand eyes will observe, reflect, and remember the trees and the fountain, the gate and the walls, the nearby windows and houses, until the aerial path they will follow home is etched in their memory as if it were marked in space by two lines of steel.

{66}

{66}

A new mystery confronts us here, which we shall do well to challenge; for though it reply not, its silence still will extend the field of our conscious ignorance, which is the most fertile of all that our activity knows. How do the bees contrive to find their way back to the hive that they cannot possibly see, that is hidden, perhaps, by the trees, that in any event must form an imperceptible point in space? How is it that if taken in a box to a spot two or three miles from their home, they will almost invariably succeed in finding their way back?

A new mystery challenges us here, and it's worth diving into; because even if it doesn't answer us, its silence will still widen the gap of what we don't know, which is the most productive aspect of our exploration. How do bees manage to return to their hive, which they can't possibly see and may be hidden by trees, making it just a tiny point in space? How is it that if they're placed in a box and taken two or three miles away from their home, they almost always manage to find their way back?

Do obstacles offer no barrier to their sight; do they guide themselves by certain indications and landmarks; or do they possess that peculiar, imperfectly understood sense that we ascribe to the swallows and pigeons, for instance, and term the "sense of direction"? The experiments of J. H. Fabre, of Lubbock, and, above all, of Romanes (Nature, 29 Oct. 1886) seem to establish that it is not this strange instinct that guides them. I have, on the other hand, more than once noticed that they appear to pay no attention to the colour or form of the hive. They are attracted rather by the ordinary appearance of the platform on which their home reposes, by the position of the entrance, and of the alighting-board. But this even is merely subsidiary; were the front of the hive to be altered from top to bottom, during the workers' absence, they would still unhesitatingly direct their course to it from out the far depths of the horizon; and only when confronted by the unrecognisable threshold would they seem for one instant to pause. Such experiments as lie in our power point rather to their guiding themselves by an extraordinarily minute and precise appreciation of landmarks. It is not the hive that they seem to remember, but its position, calculated to the minutest fraction, in its relation to neighbouring objects. And so marvellous is this appreciation, so mathematically certain, so profoundly inscribed in their memory, that if, after five months' hibernation in some obscure cellar, the hive, when replaced on the platform, should be set a little to right or to left of its former position, all the workers, on their return from the earliest flowers, will infallibly steer their direct and unwavering course to the precise spot that it filled the previous year; and only after some hesitation and groping will they discover the door which stands not now where it once had stood. It is as though space had preciously preserved, the whole winter through, the indelible track of their flight: as though the print of their tiny, laborious footsteps, still lay graven in the sky.

Do obstacles not block their sight; do they navigate by certain signals and markers; or do they have that unique, not fully understood sense that we credit to swallows and pigeons, which we call the "sense of direction"? The experiments by J. H. Fabre, Lubbock, and especially Romanes (Nature, 29 Oct. 1886) suggest that it isn’t this strange instinct that guides them. On the other hand, I've noticed more than once that they don’t seem to care about the color or shape of the hive. They are drawn more to the regular look of the platform where their home rests, the location of the entrance, and the landing board. But even this is just a secondary factor; if the front of the hive were changed completely while the workers were away, they would still confidently make their way to it from far across the horizon; and only when faced with the unfamiliar entrance would they seem to pause for just a moment. The experiments we can conduct indicate that they guide themselves by an incredibly detailed and precise awareness of landmarks. It is not the hive they seem to remember, but its exact position in relation to nearby objects. This sense of awareness is so remarkable, so mathematically accurate, so deeply embedded in their memory, that if, after five months’ hibernation in some hidden cellar, the hive is moved slightly to the right or left of its former spot, all the workers, upon returning from the earliest flowers, will unerringly head straight for the exact place it occupied the previous year; and only after some hesitation and searching will they find the entrance that is no longer where it used to be. It’s as if space has carefully preserved the exact path of their flight all winter long: as if the imprint of their tiny, hardworking footsteps still remains etched in the sky.

If the hive be displaced, therefore, many bees will lose their way; except in the case of their having been carried far from their former home, and finding the country completely transformed that they had grown to know perfectly within a radius of two or three miles; for then, if care be taken to warn them, by means of a little gangway connecting with the alighting-board, at the entrance to the hive, that some change has occurred, they will at once proceed to seek new bearings and create fresh landmarks.

If the hive is moved, many bees will get lost; unless they have been taken far from their old home and discover that the area they once knew well within two or three miles has completely changed. In that case, if you carefully guide them with a small pathway connecting to the landing board at the hive's entrance, letting them know that something has changed, they will quickly look for new directions and set up new landmarks.

{67}

{67}

And now let us return to the city that is being repeopled, where myriad cradles are incessantly opening, and the solid walls even appear to be moving. But this city still lacks a queen. Seven or eight curious structures arise from the centre of one of the combs, and remind us, scattered as they are over the surface of the ordinary cells, of the circles and protuberances that appear so strange on the photographs of the moon. They are a species of capsule, contrived of wrinkled wax or of inclined glands, hermetically sealed, which fills the place of three or four workers' cells. As a rule, they are grouped around the same point; and a numerous guard keep watch, with singular vigilance and restlessness, over this region that seems instinct with an indescribable prestige. It is here that the mothers are formed. In each one of these capsules, before the swarm departs, an egg will be placed by the mother, or more probably—though as to this we have no certain knowledge—by one of the workers; an egg that she will have taken from some neighbouring cell, and that is absolutely identical with those from which workers are hatched.

And now let's go back to the city that's being repopulated, where countless cradles are constantly opening, and the solid walls even seem to be moving. But this city still doesn't have a queen. Seven or eight odd structures rise from the center of one of the combs, and remind us, scattered as they are over the surface of the regular cells, of the circles and bumps that look so strange in photographs of the moon. They are a type of capsule, made of wrinkled wax or inclined glands, sealed tight, which takes the place of three or four worker cells. Usually, they are grouped around the same point; a large number of guards keep watch, with unusual vigilance and restlessness, over this area that feels charged with an indescribable prestige. This is where the mothers are formed. In each of these capsules, before the swarm leaves, a mother will place an egg, or more likely—though we can't be certain—one of the workers will; an egg that she will have taken from a nearby cell, and that is exactly the same as those from which workers are hatched.

From this egg, after three days, a small larva will issue, and receive a special and very abundant nourishment; and henceforth we are able to follow, step by step, the movements of one of those magnificently vulgar methods of nature on which, were we dealing with men, we should bestow the august name of fatality. The little larva, thanks to this regimen, assumes an exceptional development; and in its ideas, no less than in its body, there ensues so considerable a change that the bee to which it will give birth might almost belong to an entirely different race of insects.

From this egg, after three days, a small larva will emerge and receive a special and abundant nourishment; from this point on, we can closely observe the remarkable yet ordinary processes of nature that, if it were about humans, we might call fate. Thanks to this nourishment, the little larva undergoes exceptional development; and in its physical form, as well as in its instincts, it experiences such a significant transformation that the bee it eventually becomes could almost be considered a completely different species of insect.

Four or five years will be the period of her life, instead of the six or seven weeks of the ordinary worker. Her abdomen will be twice as long, her colour more golden, and clearer; her sting will be curved, and her eyes have seven or eight thousand facets instead of twelve or thirteen thousand. Her brain will be smaller, but she will possess enormous ovaries, and a special organ besides, the spermatheca, that will render her almost an hermaphrodite. None of the instincts will be hers that belong to a life of toil; she will have no brushes, no pockets wherein to secrete the wax, no baskets to gather the pollen. The habits, the passions, that we regard as inherent in the bee, will all be lacking in her. She will not crave for air, or the light of the sun; she will die without even once having tasted a flower. Her existence will pass in the shadow, in the midst of a restless throng; her sole occupation the indefatigable search for cradles that she must fill. On the other hand she alone will know the disquiet of love. Not even twice, it may be, in her life shall she look on the light—for the departure of the swarm is by no means inevitable; on one occasion only, perhaps, will she make use of her wings, but then it will be to fly to her lover. It is strange to see so many things—organs, ideas, desires, habits, an entire destiny—depending, not on a germ, which were the ordinary miracle of the plant, the animal, and man, but on a curious inert substance: a drop of honey.*

Four or five years will be the duration of her life, instead of the six or seven weeks typical for an ordinary worker. Her abdomen will be twice as long, her color more golden and clearer; her sting will be curved, and her eyes will have seven or eight thousand facets instead of twelve or thirteen thousand. Her brain will be smaller, but she will have huge ovaries and a special organ called the spermatheca, which will make her almost a hermaphrodite. She won’t have any instincts that come from a life of hard work; she won’t have brushes, pockets to store wax, or baskets to collect pollen. The habits and passions we consider inherent to bees will all be absent in her. She won’t long for air or sunlight; she will die without even having tasted a flower. Her life will be spent in shadow, among a restless crowd; her only task will be the tireless search for cradles she needs to fill. However, she alone will know the restlessness of love. It’s possible she won’t see the light more than twice in her life—since the swarming isn’t guaranteed; perhaps she’ll only use her wings once, and it will be to fly to her mate. It’s strange to see so many things—organs, ideas, desires, habits, an entire destiny—depending not on a germ, which is the usual miracle of plants, animals, and humans, but on a curious, inert substance: a drop of honey.*

     *It is generally admitted to-day that workers and queens,
     after the hatching of the egg, receive the same
     nourishment,—a kind of milk, very rich in nitrogen, that a
     special gland in the nurses' head secretes. But after a few
     days the worker larvae are weaned, and put on a coarser diet
     of honey and pollen; whereas the future queen, until she be
     fully developed, is copiously fed on the precious milk known
     as "royal jelly."
     *It is generally accepted today that worker bees and queens, after the egg hatches, get the same kind of food—a type of milk that is very high in nitrogen, secreted by a special gland in the nurses' heads. However, after a few days, the worker larvae are weaned and given a rougher diet of honey and pollen; meanwhile, the future queen continues to be fed abundantly with the valuable substance known as "royal jelly" until she is fully developed.*

{68}

{68}

About a week has passed since the departure of the old queen. The royal nymphs asleep in the capsules are not all of the same age, for it is to the interest of the bees that the births should be nicely gradationed, and take place at regular intervals, in accordance with their possible desire for a second swarm, a third, or even a fourth. The workers have for some hours now been actively thinning the walls of the ripest cell, while the young queen, from within, has been simultaneously gnawing the rounded lid of her prison. And at last her head appears; she thrusts herself forward; and, with the help of the guardians who hasten eagerly to her, who brush her, caress her, and clean her, she extricates herself altogether and takes her first steps on the comb. At the moment of birth she too, like the workers, is trembling and pale, but after ten minutes or so her legs become stronger, and a strange restlessness seizes her; she feels that she is not alone, that her kingdom has yet to be conquered, that close by pretenders are hiding; and she eagerly paces the waxen walls in search of her rivals. But there intervene here the mysterious decisions and wisdom of instinct, of the spirit of the hive, or of the assembly of workers. The most surprising feature of all, as we watch these things happening before us in a hive of glass, is the entire absence of hesitation, of the slightest division of opinion. There is not a trace of discussion or discord. The atmosphere of the city is one of absolute unanimity, preordained, which reigns over all; and every one of the bees would appear to know in advance the thought of her sisters. And yet this moment is the gravest, the most vital, in their entire history. They have to choose between three or four courses whose results, in the distant future, will be totally different; which, too, the slightest accident may render disastrous. They have to reconcile the multiplication of species—which is their passion, or innate duty—with the preservation of the hive and its people. They will err at times; they will successively send forth three or four swarms, thereby completely denuding the mother-city; and these swarms, too feeble to organise, will succumb, it may be, at the approach of winter, caught unawares by this climate of ours, which is different far from their original climate, that the bees, notwithstanding all, have never forgotten. In such cases they suffer from what is known as "swarming fever;" a condition wherein life, as in ordinary fever, reacting too ardently on itself, passes its aim, completes the circle, and discovers only death.

About a week has gone by since the old queen left. The royal nymphs asleep in their cells aren’t all the same age because it benefits the bees to have births spaced out nicely, according to their potential desire for a second swarm, a third, or even a fourth. For several hours now, the worker bees have been actively thinning the walls of the ripest cell while the young queen has been gnawing at the round lid of her prison from the inside. Finally, her head appears; she pushes herself forward, and with help from the eager guardians who rush to her, brush her, caress her, and clean her, she frees herself completely and takes her first steps on the comb. At the moment she’s born, she’s trembling and pale, like the workers, but after about ten minutes her legs grow stronger, and a strange restlessness grips her; she senses that she’s not alone, that her kingdom still needs to be claimed, and that pretenders are hiding nearby. She eagerly walks along the wax walls looking for her rivals. But here, the mysterious decisions and wisdom of instinct, the spirit of the hive, or the assembly of workers come into play. The most surprising thing, as we watch this unfold in a glass hive, is the complete lack of hesitation or even the slightest disagreement. There’s no sign of discussion or discord. The atmosphere within the hive exudes absolute unity, a preordained order that governs everything; every bee seems to know what her sisters are thinking ahead of time. Yet this moment is the most critical, the most significant, in their entire history. They need to choose between three or four paths, each leading to completely different outcomes in the future; even the smallest accident could make things disastrous. They have to balance their passion for multiplying the species, which is their instinctive duty, with the survival of the hive and its community. They will make mistakes; they may send out three or four swarms that will completely strip the mother city, and those swarms, too weak to organize, could perish when winter comes, caught off guard by this climate that is so different from their original one, which the bees, nevertheless, have never forgotten. In such cases, they suffer from what’s called “swarming fever”—a state where life, like in regular fever, reacts too intensely upon itself, misses its target, completes the cycle, and ends up discovering only death.

{69}

{69}

Of all the decisions before them there is none that would seem imperative; nor can man, if content to play the part of spectator only, foretell in the slightest degree which one the bees will adopt. But that the most careful deliberation governs their choice is proved by the fact that we are able to influence, or even determine it, by for instance reducing or enlarging the space we accord them; or by removing combs full of honey, and setting up, in their stead, empty combs which are well supplied with workers' cells.

Of all the decisions in front of them, none seem urgent; nor can a person, if they choose to just watch, predict at all which option the bees will take. However, it's clear that their choice is guided by careful consideration, as shown by how we can affect or even decide it by, for example, making the space we give them smaller or larger; or by taking away honey-filled combs and replacing them with empty combs that have plenty of worker cells.

The question they have to consider is not whether a second or third swarm shall be immediately launched,—for in arriving at such a decision they would merely be blindly and thoughtlessly yielding to the caprice or temptation of a favourable moment,—but the instantaneous, unanimous adoption of measures that shall enable them to issue a second swarm or "cast" three or four days after the birth of the first queen, and a third swarm three days after the departure of the second, with this first queen at their head. It must be admitted, therefore, that we discover here a perfectly reasoned system, and a mature combination of plans extending over a period considerable indeed when compared with the brevity of the bee's existence.

The question they need to think about isn't whether to immediately send out a second or third swarm—because making that choice would just mean blindly giving in to the moment's whim or allure. Instead, they should quickly and collectively agree on a strategy that allows them to release a second swarm or "cast" three or four days after the first queen is born, and a third swarm three days after the second leaves, all with the first queen leading them. So, it must be acknowledged that we see here a well-thought-out system and a carefully planned approach that spans a significant amount of time when you consider how short the bee's life is.

These measures concern the care of the youthful queens who still lie immured in their waxen prisons. Let us assume that the "spirit of the hive" has pronounced against the despatch of a second swarm. Two courses still remain open. The bees may permit the first-born of the royal virgins, the one whose birth we have witnessed, to destroy her sister-enemies; or they may elect to wait till she have performed the perilous ceremony known as the "nuptial flight," whereon the nation's future depends. The immediate massacre will be authorised often, and often denied; but in the latter case it is of course not easy for us to pronounce whether the bees' decision be due to a desire for a second swarm, or to their recognition of the dangers attending the nuptial flight; for it will happen at times that, on account of the weather unexpectedly becoming less favourable, or for some other reason we cannot divine, they will suddenly change their mind, renounce the cast that they had decreed, and destroy the royal progeny they had so carefully preserved. But at present we will suppose that they have determined to dispense with a second swarm, and that they accept the risks of the nuptial flight. Our young queen hastens towards the large cradles, urged on by her great desire, and the guard make way before her. Listening only to her furious jealousy, she will fling herself on to the first cell she comes across, madly strip off the wax with her teeth and claws, tear away the cocoon that carpets the cell, and divest the sleeping princess of every covering. If her rival should be already recognisable, the queen will turn so that her sting may enter the capsule, and will frantically stab it with her venomous weapon until the victim perish. She then becomes calmer, appeased by the death that puts a term to the hatred of every creature; she withdraws her sting, hurries to the adjoining cell, attacks it and opens it, passing it by should she find in it only an imperfect larva or nymph; nor does she pause till, at last, exhausted and breathless, her claws and teeth glide harmless over the waxen walls.

These measures relate to the care of the young queens who are still trapped in their waxen cells. Let's assume that the "spirit of the hive" has decided against sending out a second swarm. Two options are still available. The bees might allow the first-born of the royal virgins, the one whose birth we have seen, to eliminate her sister rivals; or they might choose to wait until she has completed the risky process known as the "nuptial flight," which the future of the colony depends on. The immediate slaughter will often be approved and often denied; but in the latter case, it’s hard for us to determine whether the bees' choice is based on a wish for a second swarm or a recognition of the risks involved in the nuptial flight. Sometimes, unexpectedly poor weather or some other unknown reason could cause them to change their minds, abandon the plan they had made, and destroy the royal offspring they had been so careful to protect. For now, let’s assume they have decided against sending out a second swarm and are willing to take the risks of the nuptial flight. Our young queen rushes toward the large cradles, driven by her strong desire, and the guards clear a path for her. Ignoring her intense jealousy, she lunges at the first cell she encounters, frantically tearing off the wax with her teeth and claws, ripping away the cocoon that lines the cell, and stripping the sleeping princess of all coverings. If her rival is already identifiable, the queen positions herself so her sting can reach the capsule and angrily stabs it with her venomous weapon until her enemy dies. She then becomes calmer, soothed by the death that ends the hatred of all beings; she withdraws her sting, rushes to the next cell, attacks it, and opens it, passing it by if she finds only an imperfect larva or nymph. She doesn’t stop until, finally exhausted and breathless, her claws and teeth glide harmlessly over the waxen walls.

The bees that surround her have calmly watched her fury, have stood by, inactive, moving only to leave her path clear; but no sooner has a cell been pierced and laid waste than they eagerly flock to it, drag out the corpse of the ravished nymph, or the still living larva, and thrust it forth from the hive, thereupon gorging themselves with the precious royal jelly that adheres to the sides of the cell. And finally, when the queen has become too weak to persist in her passion, they will themselves complete the massacre of the innocents; and the sovereign race, and their dwellings, will all disappear.

The bees around her have calmly observed her anger, standing by, doing nothing but keeping her path clear; but as soon as a cell is damaged and ruined, they quickly swarm to it, dragging out the body of the violated nymph or the still-living larva, and pushing it out of the hive, then feasting on the valuable royal jelly that clings to the sides of the cell. Finally, when the queen is too weak to continue her frenzy, they will finish the slaughter of the innocent themselves; and the royal lineage, along with their homes, will vanish completely.

This is the terrible hour of the hive; the only occasion, with that of the more justifiable execution of the drones, when the workers suffer discord and death to be busy amongst them; and here, as often in nature, it is the favoured of love who attract to themselves the most extraordinary shafts of violent death.

This is the awful hour of the hive; the only time, along with the more justified removal of the drones, when the workers experience conflict and death among them; and here, as is often the case in nature, it is those favored by love who draw the most extraordinary and violent ends upon themselves.

It will happen at times that two queens will be hatched simultaneously, the occurrence being rare, however, for the bees take special care to prevent it. But whenever this does take place, the deadly combat will begin the moment they emerge from their cradles; and of this combat Huber was the first to remark an extraordinary feature. Each time, it would seem that the queens, in their passes, present their chitrinous cuirasses to each other in such a fashion that the drawing of the sting would prove mutually fatal; one might almost believe that, even as a god or goddess was wont to interpose in the combats of the Iliad, so a god or a goddess, the divinity of the race, perhaps, interposes here; and the two warriors, stricken with simultaneous terror, divide and fly, to meet shortly after and separate again should the double disaster once more menace the future of their people; till at last one of them shall succeed in surprising her clumsier or less wary rival, and in killing her without risk to herself. For the law of the race has called for one sacrifice only.

It sometimes happens that two queens hatch at the same time, though this is rare because the bees take special care to prevent it. But whenever it does happen, a deadly battle starts the moment they come out of their cells; and Huber was the first to notice something extraordinary about this fight. It seems that, as they clash, the queens show their hardened exoskeletons to each other in such a way that if either stings, it would be fatal for both. One might almost think that, just like a god or goddess intervened in the battles of the Iliad, a deity—a divine figure of their kind—steps in here as well; and the two fighters, suddenly scared, break apart and flee, only to regroup and separate again if their future is once more threatened by mutual destruction. Eventually, one of them will catch her more clumsy or less careful rival off guard and kill her without endangering herself. For the law of their kind allows for only one to survive.

The cradles having thus been destroyed and the rivals all slain, the young queen is accepted by her people; but she will not truly reign over them, or be treated as was her mother before her, until the nuptial flight be accomplished; for until she be impregnated the bees will hold her but lightly, and render most passing homage. Her history, however, will rarely be as uneventful as this, for the bees will not often renounce their desire for a second swarm. In that case, as before, quick with the same desires, the queen will approach the royal cells; but instead of meeting with docile servants who second her efforts, she will find her path blocked by a numerous and hostile guard. In her fury, and urged on by her fixed idea, she will endeavour to force her way through, or to outflank them; but everywhere sentinels are posted to protect the sleeping princesses. She persists, she returns to the charge, to be repulsed with ever increasing severity, to be somewhat roughly handled even, until at last she begins vaguely to understand that these little inflexible workers stand for a law before which that law must bend whereby she is inspired.

The cradles have been destroyed and the rivals are all gone, so the young queen is accepted by her people. However, she won’t truly reign over them or be treated like her mother was until she completes her nuptial flight; because until she’s fertilized, the bees will regard her lightly and give her only minimal respect. Her story, though, is rarely this uneventful, as the bees often won’t let go of their desire for a second swarm. In that situation, driven by the same instincts, the queen will head toward the royal cells; but instead of finding obedient supporters ready to help her, she will encounter a large and aggressive guard blocking her way. In her anger, and pushed by her obsession, she will try to push through or outmaneuver them; but sentinels are posted everywhere to guard the sleeping princesses. She continues to push forward, coming back to try again, only to be pushed back with increasing force, even being handled rather roughly, until she starts to grasp that these little, determined workers represent a law she must respect, despite the one that drives her.

And at last she goes, and wanders from comb to comb, her unsatisfied wrath finding vent in a war-song, or angry complaint, that every bee-keeper knows; resembling somewhat the note of a distant trumpet of silver; so intense, in its passionate feebleness, as to be clearly audible, in the evening especially, two or three yards from the double walls of the most carefully enclosed hive.

And finally, she leaves and moves from comb to comb, her unfulfilled anger expressed in a war song or frustrated complaint that every beekeeper recognizes; it sounds a bit like a distant silver trumpet; so intense in its passionate weakness that it can be clearly heard, especially in the evening, two or three yards away from the double walls of the most securely enclosed hive.

Upon the workers this royal cry has a magical effect. It terrifies them, it induces a kind of respectful stupor; and when the queen sends it forth, as she halts in front of the cells whose approach is denied her, the guardians who have but this moment been hustling her, pushing her back, will at once desist, and wait, with bent head, till the cry shall have ceased to resound. Indeed, some believe that it is thanks to the prestige of this cry, which the Sphinx Atropos imitates, that the latter is able to enter the hive, and gorge itself with honey, without the least molestation on the part of the bees.

Upon the workers, this royal shout has a magical effect. It scares them and puts them in a sort of respectful daze; when the queen lets it out while standing in front of the cells she can't access, the guardians who were just shoving her back will immediately stop and wait, heads bowed, until the shout fades away. In fact, some believe that it's because of the power of this shout, which the Sphinx Atropos mimics, that the latter can enter the hive and stuff itself with honey without any trouble from the bees.

For two or three days, sometimes even for five, this indignant lament will be heard, this challenge that the queen addresses to her well protected rivals. And as these in their turn develop, in their turn grow anxious to see the light, they too set to work to gnaw the lids of their cells. A mighty disorder would now appear to threaten the republic. But the genius of the hive, at the time that it formed its decision, was able to foretell every consequence that might ensue; and the guardians have had their instructions: they know exactly what must be done, hour by hour, to meet the attacks of a foiled instinct, and conduct two opposite forces to a successful issue. They are fully aware that if the young queens should escape who now clamour for birth, they would fall into the hands of their elder sister, by this time irresistible, who would destroy them one by one. The workers, therefore, will pile on fresh layers of wax in proportion as the prisoner reduces, from within, the walls of her tower; and the impatient princess will ardently persist in her labour, little suspecting that she has to deal with an enchanted obstacle, that rises ever afresh from its ruin. She hears the war-cry of her rival; and already aware of her royal duty and destiny, although she has not yet looked upon life, nor knows what a hive may be, she answers the challenge from within the depths of her prison. But her cry is different; it is stifled and hollow, for it has to traverse the walls of a tomb; and, when night is falling, and noises are hushed, and high over all there reigns the silence of the stars, the apiarist who nears these marvellous cities and stands, questioning, at their entrance, recognises and understands the dialogue that is passing between the wandering queen and the virgins in prison.

For two or three days, sometimes even five, this angry cry can be heard, this challenge that the queen throws out to her well-guarded rivals. And as they start to grow anxious for their own emergence, they also begin to work at gnawing the lids of their cells. A huge disruption seems to be threatening the community. But the intelligence of the hive, when it made its decision, could predict every consequence that might follow; and the guardians have been given their orders: they know precisely what needs to be done, hour by hour, to counter the thwarted instincts and guide two opposing forces to a successful outcome. They fully understand that if the young queens who are now clamoring for freedom manage to escape, they will be at the mercy of their older sister, who by now is unstoppable, and she would eliminate them one by one. Therefore, the workers will keep adding more layers of wax as the captive reduces the walls of her tower from the inside; and the impatient princess will tirelessly continue her efforts, unaware that she is up against an enchanted barrier that rises anew from its own destruction. She hears the battle cry of her rival; and already conscious of her royal duty and destiny, even though she has yet to witness life or know what a hive truly is, she responds to the challenge from the depths of her prison. But her cry is different; it is muffled and hollow, as it has to pass through the walls of a tomb; and when night falls, and sounds quiet down, with the silence of the stars enveloping everything, the beekeeper who approaches these incredible cities and stands, pondering at their entrance, recognizes and understands the exchange happening between the wandering queen and the imprisoned maidens.

{72}

{72}

To the young princesses, however, this prolonged reclusion is of material benefit; for when they at last are freed they have grown mature and vigorous, and are able to fly. But during this period of waiting the strength of the first queen has also increased, and is sufficient now to enable her to face the perils of the voyage. The time has arrived, therefore, for the departure of the second swarm, or "cast," with the first-born of the queens at its head. No sooner has she gone than the workers left in the hive will set one of the prisoners free; and she will evince the same murderous desires, send forth the same cries of anger, until, at last, after three or four days, she will leave the hive in her turn, at the head of the tertiary swarm; and so in succession, in the case of "swarming fever," till the mother-city shall be completely exhausted.

To the young princesses, however, this long period of isolation is really beneficial; because when they finally get to leave, they have matured and gained strength, making them ready to fly. But during this waiting time, the strength of the first queen has also grown, and she is now strong enough to handle the risks of the journey. The moment has come for the second group, or "cast," to leave, led by the first-born of the queens. As soon as she departs, the workers left in the hive will free one of the captives; she will show the same aggressive instincts and make the same angry cries, until finally, after three or four days, she will exit the hive as well, leading the third swarm; and this continues, in the case of "swarming fever," until the mother city is completely drained.

Swammerdam cites a hive that, through its swarms and the swarms of its swarms, was able in a single season to found no less than thirty colonies.

Swammerdam mentions a hive that, through its swarms and the swarms of its swarms, managed to establish no less than thirty colonies in just one season.

Such extraordinary multiplication is above all noticeable after disastrous winters; and one might almost believe that the bees, forever in touch with the secret desires of nature, are conscious of the dangers that menace their race. But at ordinary times this fever will rarely occur in a strong and well-governed hive. There are many that swarm only once; and some, indeed, not at all.

Such incredible reproduction is especially evident after harsh winters; it almost seems like the bees, always in tune with nature's hidden desires, are aware of the threats to their survival. However, during normal times, this intense activity rarely happens in a strong and well-managed hive. Many hives only swarm once, and some don’t swarm at all.

After the second swarm the bees, as a rule, will renounce further division, owing either to their having observed the excessive feebleness of their own stock, or to the prudence urged upon them by threatening skies. In that case they will allow the third queen to slaughter the captives; ordinary life will at once be resumed, and pursued with the more ardour for the reason that the workers are all very young, that the hive is depopulated and impoverished, and that there are great voids to fill before the arrival of winter.

After the second swarm, the bees usually stop dividing further, either because they've noticed how weak their colony has become or due to the caution brought on by looming storms. In this case, they'll let the third queen take care of the captives; normal life will quickly resume, and the workers will be more motivated because they are all very young, the hive is empty and lacking resources, and there are significant gaps to fill before winter comes.

{73}

{73}

The departure of the second and third swarms resembles that of the first, and the conditions are identical, with the exception that the bees are fewer in number, less circumspect, and lacking in scouts; and also that the young and virgin queen, being unencumbered and ardent, will fly much further, and in the first stage lead the swarm to a considerable distance from the hive. The conduct of these second and third migrations will be far more rash, and their future more problematical. The queen at their head, the representative of the future, has not yet been impregnated. Their entire destiny depends on the ensuing nuptial flight. A passing bird, a few drops of rain, a mistake, a cold wind—any one of these may give rise to irremediable disaster. Of this the bees are so well aware that when the young queen sallies forth in quest of her lover, they often will abandon the labours they have begun, will forsake the home of a day that already is dear to them, and accompany her in a body, dreading to let her pass out of their sight, eager, as they form closely around her, and shelter her beneath their myriad devoted wings, to lose themselves with her, should love cause her to stray so far from the hive that the as yet unfamiliar road of return shall grow blurred and hesitating in every memory.

The departure of the second and third swarms is similar to the first, with the same conditions, except there are fewer bees, they're less cautious, and there are no scouts. Also, the young, virgin queen, being free and enthusiastic, will fly much farther and initially lead the swarm far away from the hive. The behavior of these second and third migrations will be much more reckless, and their future is uncertain. The queen leading them, representing what’s to come, hasn’t been mated yet. Their entire fate depends on the upcoming mating flight. A passing bird, a few drops of rain, a misstep, or a cold wind—any of these could lead to a serious disaster. The bees are well aware of this, so when the young queen goes out searching for her mate, they often abandon their tasks, leave behind the home they've grown attached to, and follow her closely, fearing to lose sight of her. They form a tight circle around her, eager to protect her with their many devoted wings, ready to get lost with her if love takes her so far from the hive that the unfamiliar path home becomes blurry and uncertain in their memories.

{74}

{74}

But so potent is the law of the future that none of these uncertainties, these perils of death, will cause a single bee to waver. The enthusiasm displayed by the second and third swarms is not less than that of the first. No sooner has the mother-city pronounced its decision than a battalion of workers will flock around each dangerous young queen, eager to follow her fortunes, to accompany her on the voyage where there is so much to lose, and so little to gain beyond the desire of a satisfied instinct. Whence do they derive the energy we ourselves never possess, whereby they break with the past as though with an enemy? Who is it selects from the crowd those who shall go forth, and declares who shall remain? No special class divides those who stay from those who wander abroad; it will be the younger here and the elder there; around each queen who shall never return veteran foragers jostle tiny workers, who for the first time shall face the dizziness of the blue. Nor is the proportionate strength of a swarm controlled by chance or accident, by the momentary dejection or transport of an instinct, thought, or feeling. I have more than once tried to establish a relation between the number of bees composing a swarm and the number of those that remain; and although the difficulties of this calculation are such as to preclude anything approaching mathematical precision, I have at least been able to gather that this relation—if we take into account the brood-cells, or in other words the forthcoming births—is sufficiently constant to point to an actual and mysterious reckoning on the part of the genius of the hive.

But the law of the future is so powerful that none of these uncertainties, these threats of death, will make a single bee hesitate. The enthusiasm shown by the second and third swarms is just as strong as that of the first. As soon as the mother city makes its decision, a group of worker bees will crowd around each risky young queen, eager to follow her lead, to accompany her on the journey where there’s so much to lose and so little to gain aside from the urge of a fulfilled instinct. Where do they get the energy that we ourselves never have, allowing them to break ties with the past as if it were an enemy? Who decides from the crowd who gets to leave and who stays behind? There’s no special category separating those who remain from those who venture out; it could be the younger here and the older there; surrounding each queen, who will never return, experienced foragers jostle with tiny workers, who will face the vast blue for the first time. The overall strength of a swarm isn’t determined by chance or accident, or by fleeting feelings of sadness or excitement. I have tried more than once to find a connection between the number of bees in a swarm and the number that stay behind; and although the complexities of this calculation make it impossible to achieve exact mathematical precision, I have at least been able to conclude that this relationship—if we consider the brood cells, or in other words the upcoming births—is consistent enough to suggest an actual and mysterious calculation by the hive’s instinct.

{75}

{75}

We will not follow these swarms on their numerous, and often most complicated, adventures. Two swarms, at times, will join forces; at others, two or three of the imprisoned queens will profit by the confusion attending the moment of departure to elude the watchfulness of their guardians and join the groups that are forming. Occasionally, too, one of the young queens, finding herself surrounded by males, will cause herself to be impregnated in the swarming flight, and will then drag all her people to an extraordinary height and distance. In the practice of apiculture these secondary and tertiary swarms are always returned to the mother-hive. The queens will meet on the comb; the workers will gather around and watch their combat; and, when the stronger has overcome the weaker they will then, in their ardour for work and hatred of disorder, expel the corpses, close the door on the violence of the future, forget the past, return to their cells, and resume their peaceful path to the flowers that await them.

We will not follow these swarms in their many complex adventures. At times, two swarms will team up; at other times, a couple of the trapped queens will take advantage of the confusion during their departure to slip past their caretakers and join the emerging groups. Occasionally, one of the young queens, surrounded by males, will allow herself to be mated during the swarming flight and then lead all her followers to an extraordinary height and distance. In beekeeping, these secondary and tertiary swarms are always returned to the main hive. The queens will meet on the comb; the workers will gather around to watch their fight; and when the stronger queen defeats the weaker one, they will, driven by their urge to work and their aversion to chaos, remove the bodies, shut the door on future violence, forget the past, return to their cells, and resume their peaceful journey to the flowers waiting for them.

{76}

{76}

We will now, in order to simplify matters, return to the queen whom the bees have permitted to slaughter her sisters, and resume the account of her adventures. As I have already stated, this massacre will be often prevented, and often sanctioned, at times even when the bees apparently do not intend to issue a second swarm; for we notice the same diversity of political spirit in the different hives of an apiary as in the different human nations of a continent. But it is clear that the bees will act imprudently in giving their consent; for if the queen should die, or stray in the nuptial flight, it will be impossible to fill her place, the workers' larvae having passed the age when they are susceptible of royal transformation. Let us assume, however, that the imprudence has been committed; and behold our first-born, therefore, unique sovereign, and recognised as such in the spirit of her people. But she is still a virgin. To become as was the mother before her, it is essential that she should meet the male within the first twenty days of her life. Should the event for some reason be delayed beyond this period, her virginity becomes irrevocable. And yet we have seen that she is not sterile, virgin though she be. There confronts us here the great mystery—or precaution—of Nature, that is known as parthenogenesis, and is common to a certain number of insects, such as the aphides, the lepidoptera of the Psyche genus, the hymenoptera of the Cynipede family, etc. The virgin queen is able to lay; but from all the eggs that she will deposit in the cells, be these large or small, there will issue males alone; and as these never work, as they live at the expense of the females, as they never go foraging except on their own account, and are generally incapable of providing for their subsistence, the result will be, at the end of some weeks, that the last exhausted worker will perish, and the colony be ruined and totally annihilated. The queen, we have said, will produce thousands of drones; and each of these will possess millions of the spermatozoa whereof it is impossible that a single one can have penetrated into the organism of the mother. That may not be more astounding, perhaps, than a thousand other and analogous phenomena; and, indeed, when we consider these problems, and more especially those of generation, the marvellous and the unexpected confront us so constantly—occurring far more frequently, and above all in far less human fashion, than in the most miraculous fairy stories—that after a time astonishment becomes so habitual with us that we almost cease to wonder. The fact, however, is sufficiently curious to be worthy of notice. But, on the other hand, how shall we explain to ourselves the aim that nature can have in thus favouring the valueless drones at the cost of the workers who are so essential? Is she afraid lest the females might perhaps be induced by their intellect unduly to limit the number of their parasites, which, destructive though they be, are still necessary for the preservation of the race? Or is it merely an exaggerated reaction against the misfortune of the unfruitful queen? Can we have here one of those blind and extreme precautions which, ignoring the cause of the evil, overstep the remedy; and, in the endeavour to prevent an unfortunate accident, bring about a catastrophe? In reality—though we must not forget that the natural, primitive reality is different: from that of the present, for in the original forest the colonies might well be far more scattered than they are to-day—in reality the queen's unfruitfulness will rarely be due to the want of males, for these are very numerous always, and will flock from afar; but rather to the rain, or the cold, that will have kept her too long in the hive, and more frequently still to the imperfect state of her wings, whereby she will be prevented from describing the high flight in the air that the organ of the male demands. Nature, however, heedless of these more intrinsic causes, is so deeply concerned with the multiplication of males, that we sometimes find, in motherless hives, two or three workers possessed of so great a desire to preserve the race that, their atrophied ovaries notwithstanding, they will still endeavour to lay; and, their organs expanding somewhat beneath the empire of this exasperated sentiment, they will succeed in depositing a few eggs in the cells; but from these eggs, as from those of the virgin mother, there will, issue only males.

We will now simplify things by going back to the queen whom the bees have allowed to kill her sisters and continue her story. As I mentioned earlier, this massacre will often be prevented and sometimes approved, even when the bees don’t seem to intend to send out a second swarm. We observe the same diversity of political spirit in the various hives of an apiary as we do among different human nations on a continent. However, it’s clear that the bees will act foolishly by giving their consent; if the queen dies or gets lost during her mating flight, it will be impossible to replace her since the worker larvae have outgrown the stage where they can become queens. Let’s assume, though, that this foolish act has taken place; here we have our first-born, a unique sovereign, recognized as such by her people. But she is still a virgin. To become like her mother before her, she must meet a male within the first twenty days of her life. If this meeting is delayed beyond this time, her virginity becomes permanent. Yet, it’s interesting to note that she isn’t sterile, even though she’s a virgin. This brings us to the great mystery—or strategy—of Nature, known as parthenogenesis, which is common among certain insects, like aphids, the Psyche genus of moths, and hymenopterans of the Cynipede family, etc. The virgin queen can lay eggs; however, all the eggs she deposits in the cells, whether large or small, will only produce males. Since these males never work, live off the females, only forage for themselves, and are generally incapable of looking after themselves, eventually, after some weeks, the last exhausted worker will die, leading to the collapse and complete destruction of the colony. We noted that the queen will produce thousands of drones; each of these will have millions of sperm cells, none of which can possibly fertilize her. This may not be any more surprising than countless other phenomena; indeed, when we consider these issues, particularly those of reproduction, we’re often faced with the marvelous and unexpected—occurring far more frequently and in much less human ways than in the most fantastical fairy tales—that, over time, astonishment becomes so routine that we almost stop being surprised. Nevertheless, the fact is intriguing enough to warrant attention. But on the flip side, how do we explain nature’s rationale for favoring these worthless drones at the expense of the crucial workers? Is it worried that the females might use their intelligence to unduly limit the number of parasites, which, while destructive, are still necessary for species survival? Or is it merely an overreaction to the misfortune of a barren queen? Could this be one of those blind and drastic precautions that disregard the root cause of the issue and, in trying to prevent a mishap, lead to disaster? In reality—though we need to remember that the natural, primitive reality is different from today's, as in the original forests, colonies may have been much more spread out—the queen's infertility is rarely due to a lack of males since they are always plentiful and will come from afar. More often, it’s due to rain or cold that keeps her inside the hive too long, and more frequently still, it’s because of her imperfect wing condition that prevents her from performing the high flight required for mating. Nature, however, ignoring these more fundamental causes, is so intent on producing males that we sometimes find, in hives without a mother, two or three workers so driven to preserve the species that, despite their atrophied ovaries, they still try to lay eggs; and, under the influence of this intense feeling, they manage to deposit a few eggs in the cells. But, like those from the virgin mother, these eggs will only produce males.

{77}

{77}

Here we behold the active intervention of a superior though perhaps imprudent will, which offers irresistible obstruction to the intelligent will of a life. In the insect world such interventions are comparatively frequent, and much can be gained from their study; for this world being more densely peopled and more complex than others, certain special desires of nature are often more palpably revealed to us there; and she may even at times be detected in the midst of experiments we might almost be warranted in regarding as incomplete. She has one great and general desire, for instance, that she displays on all sides; the amelioration of each species through the triumph of the stronger. This struggle, as a rule, is most carefully organised. The hecatomb of the weak is enormous, but that matters little so long as the victors' reward be effectual and certain. But there are cases when one might almost imagine that nature had not had time enough to disentangle her combinations; cases where reward is impossible, and the fate of the victor no less disastrous than that of the vanquished. And of such, selecting an instance that will not take us too far from our bees, I know of no instance more striking than that of the triongulins of the Sitaris colletes. And it will be seen that, in many details, this story is less foreign to the history of man than might perhaps be imagined.

Here we observe the active involvement of a superior, though possibly reckless, will, which creates an unavoidable barrier to the intelligent will of a living being. In the insect world, such interventions are relatively common, and we can learn a lot from studying them; since this world is more densely populated and complex than others, certain specific desires of nature are often more clearly revealed to us there. At times, we may even catch nature in the middle of experiments that we could almost think are incomplete. For example, she has one major and overarching desire that she shows all around: the improvement of each species through the success of the stronger. Normally, this struggle is very well organized. The toll on the weak is immense, but that doesn’t matter much as long as the rewards for the victors are effective and guaranteed. However, there are situations where it seems that nature hasn't had enough time to sort out her plans; circumstances where rewards are impossible, and the fate of the victor is just as disastrous as that of the defeated. And in this regard, choosing an example that won’t stray too far from our bees, I know of no example more striking than that of the triongulins of the Sitaris colletes. It will also become clear that, in many ways, this story is less unrelated to human history than one might think.

These triongulins are the primary larvae of a parasite proper to a wild, obtuse-tongued, solitary bee, the Colletes, which builds its nest in subterranean galleries. It is their habit to lie in wait for the bee at the approach to these galleries; and then, to the number of three, four, five, or often of more, they will leap on her back, and bury themselves in her hair. Were the struggle of the weak against the strong to take place at this moment there would be no more to be said, and all would pass in accordance with universal law. But, for a reason we know not, their instinct requires, and nature has consequently ordained, that they should hold themselves tranquil so long as they remain on the back of the bee. They patiently bide their time while she visits the flowers, and constructs and provisions her cells. But no sooner has an egg been laid than they all spring upon it; and the innocent colletes carefully seals down her cell, which she has duly supplied with food, never suspecting that she has at the same time ensured the death of her offspring.

These triongulins are the main larvae of a parasite that belongs to a wild, blunt-tongued, solitary bee called the Colletes, which builds its nest in underground tunnels. They tend to wait for the bee near these tunnels, and then, in groups of three, four, five, or often more, they jump onto her back and bury themselves in her fur. If the weak were to struggle against the strong in that moment, there would be little left to say, and everything would unfold according to nature's law. However, for reasons we don't understand, their instinct dictates that they remain still as long as they’re on the bee’s back. They patiently wait while she visits flowers, builds her nest, and gathers food for her cells. But as soon as she lays an egg, they all jump on it; and the unsuspecting colletes carefully seals her cell, which she has filled with provisions, never realizing that she has also sealed the fate of her offspring.

The cell has scarcely been closed when the triongulins grouped round the egg engage in the inevitable and salutary combat of natural selection. The stronger, more agile, will seize its adversary beneath the cuirass, and, raising it aloft, will maintain it for hours in its mandibles until the victim expire. But, while this fight is in progress, another of the triongulins, that had either no rival to meet, or already has conquered, takes possession of the egg and bursts it open. The ultimate victor has therefore this fresh enemy to subdue; but the conquest is easy, for the triongulin, deep in the satisfaction of its pre-natal hunger, clings obstinately to the egg, and does not even attempt to defend itself. It is quickly despatched; and the other is at last alone, and possessor of the precious egg it has won so well. It eagerly plunges its head into the opening its predecessor had made; and begins the lengthy repast that shall transform it into a perfect insect. But nature, that has decreed this ordeal of battle, has, on the other hand, established the prize of victory with such miserly precision that nothing short of an entire egg will suffice for the nourishment of a single triongulin. So that, as we are informed by M. Mayet, to whom we owe the account of these disconcerting adventures, there is lacking to our conqueror the food its last victim consumed before death; and incapable therefore of achieving the first stage of its transformation, it dies in its turn, adhering to the skin of the egg, or adding itself, in the sugary liquid, to the number of the drowned.

The cell has hardly been closed when the triongulins gathered around the egg engage in the inevitable and beneficial struggle of natural selection. The stronger, more agile one will grab its opponent beneath the armor and, lifting it up, will hold it for hours in its jaws until the victim dies. But while this fight is happening, another triongulin, having no rival to face or already having conquered, takes over the egg and breaks it open. The ultimate winner now has this new enemy to deal with, but the conquest is easy, as the triongulin, lost in the satisfaction of its pre-natal hunger, stubbornly clings to the egg and doesn't even try to defend itself. It is quickly dispatched; and the other is finally alone, possessing the precious egg it has fought so hard for. It eagerly sticks its head into the opening made by its predecessor and begins the long feast that will transform it into a perfect insect. But nature, which has designed this battle, has also set the reward for victory so sparingly that nothing less than an entire egg will provide enough nourishment for a single triongulin. Therefore, as M. Mayet informs us, who documented these unsettling events, our conqueror lacks the food its last victim consumed before dying; and thus, unable to reach the first stage of its transformation, it dies in its turn, clinging to the skin of the egg or adding itself, in the sugary liquid, to the number of the drowned.

{78}

{78}

This case, though rarely to be followed so closely, is not unique in natural history. We have here, laid bare before us, the struggle between the conscious will of the triongulin, that seeks to live, and the obscure and general will of nature, that not only desires that the triongulin should live, but is anxious even that its life should be improved, and fortified, to a degree beyond that to which its own will impels it. But, through some strange inadvertence, the amelioration nature imposes suppresses the life of even the fittest, and the Sitaris Colletes would have long since disappeared had not chance, acting in opposition to the desires of nature, permitted isolated individuals to escape from the excellent and far-seeing law that ordains on all sides the triumph of the stronger.

This case, although rarely followed so closely, isn’t unique in natural history. We have in front of us the conflict between the conscious will of the triongulin, which strives to survive, and the vague and overarching will of nature, which not only wants the triongulin to live but is also eager for its life to be enhanced and strengthened beyond what its own will pushes for. However, due to some strange oversight, the improvements nature enforces actually undermine the survival of even the strongest, and the Sitaris Colletes would have disappeared long ago if chance hadn’t allowed some isolated individuals to escape the excellent and far-sighted law that ensures the victory of the stronger.

Can this mighty power err, then, that seems unconscious to us, but necessarily wise, seeing that the life she organises and maintains is forever proving her to be right? Can feebleness at times overcome that supreme reason, which we are apt to invoke when we have attained the limits of our own? And if that be so, by whom shall this feebleness be set right?

Can this incredible power make mistakes, even though it seems unaware to us but is clearly wise, considering that the life it organizes and sustains constantly proves it to be correct? Can weakness sometimes override that ultimate reason, which we tend to rely on when we reach the limits of our understanding? And if that’s the case, who will put this weakness in its place?

But let us return to that special form of her resistless intervention that we find in parthenogenesis. And we shall do well to remember that, remote as the world may seem in which these problems confront us, they do indeed yet concern ourselves very nearly. Who would dare to affirm that no interventions take place in the sphere of man—interventions that may be more hidden, but not the less fraught with danger? And in the case before us, which is right, in the end,—the insect, or nature? What would happen if the bees, more docile perhaps, or endowed with a higher intelligence, were too clearly to understand the desires of nature, and to follow them to the extreme; to multiply males to infinity, seeing that nature is imperiously calling for males? Would they not risk the destruction of their species? Are we to believe that there are intentions in nature that it is dangerous to understand too clearly, fatal to follow with too much ardour; and that it is one of her desires that we should not divine, and follow, all her desires? Is it not possible that herein there may lie one of the perils of the human race? We too are aware of unconscious forces within us, that would appear to demand the reverse of what our intellect urges. And this intellect of ours, that, as a rule, its own boundary reached, knows not whither to go—can it be well that it should join itself to these forces, and add to them its unexpected weight?

But let's go back to that unique way she intervenes, which we see in parthenogenesis. It's important to remember that, even though these issues may seem distant, they are still very relevant to us. Who would claim that no interventions occur in human affairs—interventions that may be less obvious, but still packed with risk? In our current situation, which is ultimately right—the insect or nature? What if bees, perhaps more compliant or equipped with higher intelligence, clearly understood nature's demands and took them to the extreme; if they endlessly increased the male population because nature urgently calls for them? Wouldn't they risk wiping out their own species? Should we believe that there are intentions in nature that it's dangerous to fully comprehend, fatal to pursue too eagerly; and that one of her wishes is for us not to perceive and follow all her desires? Might this be one of the dangers facing humanity? We too recognize unconscious forces within us that seem to demand the opposite of what our intellect suggests. And this intellect of ours, which usually stops when it reaches its limits and doesn’t know where to go next—could it be wise for it to align with these forces and add its unexpected weight to them?

{79}

{79}

Have we the right to conclude, from the dangers of parthenogenesis, that nature is not always able to proportion the means to the end; and that what she intends to preserve is preserved at times by means of precautions she has to contrive against her own precautions, and often through foreign circumstances she has not herself foreseen? But is there anything she does foresee, anything she does intend to preserve? Nature, some may say, is a word wherewith we clothe the unknowable; and few things authorise our crediting it with intelligence, or with aim. That is true. We touch here the hermetically sealed vases that furnish our conception of the universe. Reluctant, over and over again, to label these with the inscription "UNKNOWN," that disheartens us and compels us to silence, we engrave upon them, in the degree of their size and grandeur, the words "Nature, life, death, infinite, selection, spirit of the race," and many others, even as those who went before us affixed the words "God, Providence, destiny, reward," etc. Let it be so, if one will, and no more. But, though the contents of the vases remain obscure, there is gain at least in the fact that the inscriptions to-day convey less menace to us, that we are able therefore to approach them and touch them, and lay our ears close to them and listen, with wholesome curiosity.

Do we have the right to conclude, from the risks of parthenogenesis, that nature doesn’t always effectively align the means with the ends? And that what she aims to protect is sometimes safeguarded by precautions she has to create against her own measures, often influenced by external factors she hasn’t anticipated? But is there anything she does foresee, anything she truly intends to protect? Some might argue that "nature" is just a term we use to describe the unknowable; and there are few reasons to believe it possesses intelligence or purpose. That’s true. We are confronted with sealed containers that shape our understanding of the universe. Reluctantly, time and again, we hesitate to label these as "UNKNOWN," a term that discourages us and leads us to silence. Instead, we inscribe on them, according to their size and significance, terms like "Nature, life, death, infinite, selection, spirit of the race," and many others, just as those before us wrote "God, Providence, destiny, reward," etc. Let it be so, if one chooses, and nothing more. However, even if the contents of these containers remain unclear, at least there is value in the fact that the labels today pose less of a threat to us, allowing us to approach them, touch them, and listen closely with a healthy curiosity.

But whatever the name we attach to these vases, it is certain that one of them, at least, and the greatest—that which bears on its flank the name "Nature"—encloses a very real force, the most real of all, and one that is able to preserve an enormous and marvellous quantity and quality of life on our globe, by means so skilful that they surpass all that the genius of man could contrive. Could this quantity and quality be maintained by other means? Is it we who deceive ourselves when we imagine that we see precautions where perhaps there is truly no more than a fortunate chance, that has survived a million unfortunate chances?

But no matter what name we give these vases, it’s clear that at least one of them, the most significant one—with the name "Nature" marked on its side—contains a very real force, the most genuine of all. This force can sustain an incredible and wonderful amount of life on our planet, using methods so skillful that they go beyond anything human ingenuity could create. Could this amount and quality of life be sustained by other means? Are we fooling ourselves when we think we see precautions where there might actually just be a lucky chance that has survived countless unfortunate events?

{80}

{80}

That may be; but these fortunate chances teach us a lesson in admiration as valuable as those we might learn in regions superior to chance. If we let our gaze travel beyond the creatures that are possessed of a glimmer of intellect and consciousness, beyond the protozoa even, which are the first nebulous representatives of the dawning animal kingdom, we find, as has been abundantly proved by the experiments of Mr. H. J. Carter, the celebrated microscopist, that the very lowest embryos, such as the myxomycetes, manifest a will and desires and preferences; and that infusoria, which apparently have no organism whatever, give evidence of a certain cunning. The Amoebae, for instance, will patiently lie in wait for the new-born Acinetes, as they leave the maternal ovary; being aware that these must as yet be lacking their poisonous tentacles. Now, the Amoebae have neither a nervous system nor distinguishable organs of any kind. Or if we turn to the plants, which, being motionless, would seem exposed to every fatality,—without pausing to consider carnivorous species like the Drusera, which really act as animals,—we are struck by the genius that some of our humblest flowers display in contriving that the visit of the bee shall infallibly procure them the crossed fertilisation they need. See the marvellous fashion in which the Orchis Moris, our humble country orchid, combines the play of its rostellum and retinacula; observe the mathematical and automatic inclination and adhesion of its pollinia; as also the unerring double seesaw of the anthers of the wild sage, which touch the body of the visiting insect at a particular spot in order that the insect may, in its turn, touch the stigma of the neighbouring flower at another particular spot; watch, too, in the case of the Pedicularis Sylvatica, the successive, calculated movements of its stigma; and indeed the entrance of the bee into any one of these three flowers sets every organ vibrating, just as the skilful marksman who hits the black spot on the target will cause all the figures to move in the elaborate mechanisms we see in our village fairs.

That might be true; but these fortunate chances teach us a lesson in admiration just as valuable as those we might learn in places beyond chance. If we look beyond the beings that show a hint of intellect and awareness, even past the protozoa, which are the first vague representatives of the emerging animal kingdom, we discover, as demonstrated by the experiments of Mr. H. J. Carter, the renowned microscopist, that the very simplest embryos, like the myxomycetes, show will, desires, and preferences; and that infusoria, which seem to lack any real structure, reveal a certain cleverness. The Amoebae, for example, will patiently wait for the new-born Acinetes as they leave their mother’s ovary, knowing that these young ones do not yet have their poisonous tentacles. Now, the Amoebae have no nervous system or any distinguishable organs. Or if we look at plants, which, being stationary, seem vulnerable to every danger—without considering carnivorous types like the Drosera, which actually behave like animals—we are amazed by the cleverness of some of our simplest flowers in ensuring that a bee’s visit will definitely result in the cross-pollination they need. Look at the remarkable way the Orchis Moris, our humble country orchid, manipulates its rostellum and retinacula; notice the precise and automatic leaning and sticking of its pollinia; as well as the reliable double seesaw of the anthers of the wild sage, which touch the insect's body at a specific spot, allowing the insect to then touch the stigma of a nearby flower at another precise spot; also, watch the Pedicularis Sylvatica as it calculates the movements of its stigma. In fact, the entrance of the bee into any of these three flowers sets every part in motion, just like a skilled marksman hitting the bullseye will cause all the figures to move in the intricate mechanisms we see at village fairs.

We might go lower still, and show, as Ruskin has shown in his "Ethics of the Dust," the character, habits, and artifices of crystals; their quarrels, and mode of procedure, when a foreign body attempts to oppose their plans, which are more ancient by far than our imagination can conceive; the manner in which they admit or repel an enemy, the possible victory of the weaker over the stronger, as, for instance, when the all-powerful quartz submits to the humble and wily epidote, and allows this last to conquer it; the struggle, terrible sometimes and sometimes magnificent, between the rock-crystal and iron; the regular, immaculate expansion and uncompromising purity of one hyaline block, which rejects whatever is foul, and the sickly growth, the evident immorality, of its brother, which admits corruption, and writhes miserably in the void; as we might quote also the strange phenomena of crystalline cicatrisation and reintegration mentioned by Claude Bernard, etc. But the mystery here becomes too foreign to us. Let us keep to our flowers, which are the last expression of a life that has yet some kinship with our own. We are not dealing now with animals or insects, to which we attribute a special, intelligent will, thanks to which they survive. We believe, rightly or wrongly, that the flowers possess no such will; at least we cannot discover in them the slightest trace of the organs wherein will, intellect, and initiative of action, are usually born and reside. It follows, therefore, that all that acts in them in so admirable a fashion must directly proceed from what we elsewhere call nature. We are no longer concerned with the intellect of the individual; here we find the un conscious, undivided force in the act of ensnaring other forms of itself. Shall we on that account refuse to believe that these snares are pure accidents, occurring in accordance with a routine that is also incidental? We are not yet entitled to such a deduction. It might be urged that these flowers, had these miraculous combinations not been, would not have survived, but would have had their place filled by others that stood in no need of crossed fertilisation; and the non-existence of the first would have been perceived by none, nor would the life that vibrates on the earth have seemed less incomprehensible to us, less diverse, or less astounding.

We might go even deeper and show, as Ruskin did in his "Ethics of the Dust," the characteristics, habits, and tricks of crystals; their conflicts and how they respond when something foreign tries to interfere with their plans, which are far older than we can imagine; the way they accept or reject an enemy, the potential for the weaker to triumph over the stronger, like when the powerful quartz gives way to the humble and clever epidote and allows it to win; the struggle, sometimes fierce and sometimes beautiful, between rock-crystal and iron; the regular, flawless growth and uncompromising purity of one clear block that rejects anything impure, and the unhealthy developments, the evident decay, of its counterpart, which allows corruption and struggles sadly in the emptiness; as we might also mention the strange phenomena of crystalline healing and reformation mentioned by Claude Bernard, etc. But this mystery is becoming too distant for us. Let's stick to our flowers, which are the last expression of a life that still has some connection to our own. We're not talking about animals or insects, which we attribute a special, intelligent will that helps them survive. We believe, whether rightly or wrongly, that flowers lack such will; at least we can't find even a hint of the organs where will, intellect, and initiative typically arise. Therefore, everything that operates in them so impressively must come directly from what we call nature. We're no longer dealing with individual intellect; here we find the unconscious, unified force in the act of capturing other forms of itself. Should we then refuse to believe that these captures are just random occurrences, happening according to a routine that is also coincidental? We can't make that assumption just yet. It could be argued that if these miraculous combinations hadn't existed, these flowers wouldn't have survived and would have been replaced by others that didn't need cross-fertilization; and the absence of the former would have gone unnoticed, and the life that vibrates on Earth wouldn't have seemed any less incomprehensible, less diverse, or less amazing to us.

And yet it would be difficult not to admit that acts which bear all the appearance of acts of intelligence and prudence produce and support these fortunate chances. Whence do they issue,—from the being itself, or from the force whence that being draws life? I will not say "it matters but little," for, on the contrary, to know the answer were of supreme importance to us. But, in the meantime, and till we shall learn whether it be the flower that endeavours to maintain and perfect the life that nature has placed within it, or whether it be nature that puts forth an effort to maintain and improve the degree of existence the flower has assumed, or finally whether it be chance that ultimately governs chance, a multitude of semblances invite us to believe that something equal to our loftiest thoughts issues at times from a common source, that we are compelled to admire without knowing where it resides.

And yet, it would be hard to deny that actions that seem intelligent and wise create and support these fortunate outcomes. Where do they come from—within the being itself, or from the force that gives that being life? I won’t say “it doesn’t matter much,” because, on the contrary, knowing the answer is extremely important to us. But in the meantime, until we learn whether it’s the flower trying to sustain and perfect the life that nature has given it, or whether it’s nature trying to maintain and enhance the level of existence the flower has reached, or finally, if it’s chance that ultimately governs chance, a lot of appearances make us believe that something equal to our highest thoughts sometimes comes from a common source, compelling us to admire it without knowing where it exists.

There are moments when what seems error to us comes forth from this common source. But, although we know very few things, proofs abound that the seeming error was in reality an act of prudence that we at first could not grasp. In the little circle, even, that our eyes embrace we are constantly shown that what we regarded as nature's blunder close by was due to her deeming it well to adjust the presumed inadvertence out yonder. She has placed the three flowers we mentioned under conditions of such difficulty that they are unable to fertilise themselves; she considers it beneficial, therefore, for reasons beyond our powers of perception, that they should cause themselves to be fertilised by their neighbours; and, inasmuch as she enhances the intelligence of her victims, she displays on our right the genius she failed to display on our left. The byways of this genius of hers remain incomprehensible to us, but its level is always the same. It will appear to fall into error—assuming that error be possible—thereupon rising again at once in the organ charged to repair this error. Turn where we may, it towers high over our heads. It is the circular ocean, the tideless water, whereon our boldest and most independent thoughts will never be more than mere abject bubbles. We call it Nature to-day; to-morrow, perhaps, we shall give it another name, softer or more alarming. In the meanwhile it holds simultaneous, impartial sway over life and death; furnishing the two irreconcilable sisters with the magnificent and familiar weapons that adorn and distract its bosom.

There are times when what appears to be a mistake to us actually comes from this shared source. However, even though we know very little, there is plenty of evidence that the apparent error was really a wise decision that we initially did not understand. Within the small area that our eyes can see, we constantly find that what we considered nature's mistake nearby was due to her deciding it was best to correct the suspected oversight out there. She has placed the three flowers we mentioned in conditions so challenging that they cannot fertilize themselves; she believes, for reasons beyond our understanding, that it is beneficial for them to be fertilized by their neighbors. And since she enhances the capabilities of her creatures, she reveals on our right the brilliance she did not show on our left. The pathways of her genius remain baffling to us, but the level of her design is always consistent. It may seem to falter—if we assume that faltering is possible—only to rise again immediately in the mechanism designed to rectify that mistake. No matter where we look, it looms above us. It is the endless ocean, the still water, where even our boldest and most independent thoughts will always be nothing more than insignificant bubbles. We call it Nature today; tomorrow, perhaps, we will refer to it by a different name, something softer or more unsettling. In the meantime, it simultaneously and impartially governs life and death, providing the two irreconcilable sisters with the magnificent and familiar tools that both embellish and distract its embrace.

{81}

{81}

Does this force take measures to maintain what may be struggling on its surface, or must we say, arguing in the strangest of circles, that what floats on its surface must guard itself against the genius that has given it life? That question must be left open. We have no means of ascertaining whether it be notwithstanding the efforts of the superior will, or independently of these, or lastly because of these, that a species has been able to survive.

Does this force take steps to protect what might be struggling on its surface, or should we say, in a strange sort of loop, that whatever floats on its surface must defend itself against the brilliance that created it? That question remains unanswered. We have no way of knowing whether it's despite the efforts of a higher will, regardless of them, or ultimately because of them, that a species has managed to survive.

All we can say is that such a species exists, and that, on this point, therefore, nature would seem to be right. But who shall tell us how many others that we have not known have fallen victim to her restless and forgetful intellect? Beyond this, we can recognise only the surprising and occasionally hostile forms that the extraordinary fluid we call life assumes, in utter unconsciousness sometimes, at others with a kind of consciousness: the fluid which animates us equally with all the rest, which produces the very thoughts that judge it, and the feeble voice that attempts to tell its story.

All we can say is that such a species exists, and on this point, it seems that nature is right. But who can tell us how many others, that we haven't discovered, have fallen victim to her restless and forgetful nature? Beyond this, we can only recognize the surprising and sometimes hostile forms that the incredible fluid we call life takes on, sometimes without any awareness, and other times with a sort of awareness: the fluid that animates us just like everything else, which produces the very thoughts that evaluate it, and the weak voice that tries to tell its story.





VI — THE NUPTIAL FLIGHT

WE will now consider the manner in which the impregnation of the queen-bee comes to pass. Here again nature has taken extraordinary measures to favour the union of males with females of a different stock; a strange law, whereto nothing would seem to compel her; a caprice, or initial inadvertence, perhaps, whose reparation calls for the most marvellous forces her activity knows.

WE will now look at how the queen bee gets impregnated. Once again, nature has gone to great lengths to encourage the pairing of males with females from different groups; a peculiar law that seems to have no actual obligation behind it; maybe a whim or an early mistake, whose correction requires the most remarkable forces that her activity can muster.

If she had devoted half the genius she lavishes on crossed fertilisation and other arbitrary desires to making life more certain, to alleviating pain, to softening death and warding off horrible accidents, the universe would probably have presented an enigma less incomprehensible, less pitiable, than the one we are striving to solve. But our consciousness, and the interest we take in existence, must grapple, not with what might have been, but with what is.

If she had put even half the talent she spends on cross fertilization and other random desires into making life more certain, easing pain, softening death, and preventing terrible accidents, the universe would likely have posed a riddle that was less confusing and less sad than the one we’re trying to figure out. But our awareness, and the interest we have in life, has to deal not with what could have been, but with what actually is.

Around the virgin queen, and dwelling with her in the hive, are hundreds of exuberant males, forever drunk on honey; the sole reason for their existence being one act of love. But, notwithstanding the incessant contact of two desires that elsewhere invariably triumph over every obstacle, the union never takes place in the hive, nor has it been possible to bring about the impregnation of a captive queen.*

Around the virgin queen, and living with her in the hive, are hundreds of lively males, constantly intoxicated by honey; the only purpose of their existence is one act of love. However, despite the constant clash of two desires that usually overcome all obstacles elsewhere, the union never occurs in the hive, nor has it been possible to achieve the impregnation of a captured queen.*

     *Professor McLain has recently succeeded in causing a few
     queens to be artificially impregnated; but this has been the
     result of a veritable surgical operation, of the most
     delicate and complicated nature. Moreover, the fertility of
     the queens was restricted and ephemeral.
     *Professor McLain has recently managed to artificially impregnate a few queens; however, this involved a true surgical procedure that was very delicate and complex. Additionally, the queens’ fertility was limited and short-lived.

While she lives in their midst the lovers about her know not what she is. They seek her in space, in the remote depths of the horizon, never suspecting that they have but this moment quitted her, have shared the same comb with her, have brushed against her, perhaps, in the eagerness of their departure. One might almost believe that those wonderful eyes of theirs, that cover their head as though with a glittering helmet, do not recognise or desire her save when she soars in the blue. Each day, from noon till three, when the sun shines resplendent, this plumed horde sallies forth in search of the bride, who is indeed more royal, more difficult of conquest, than the most inaccessible princess of fairy legend; for twenty or thirty tribes will hasten from all the neighbouring cities, her court thus consisting of more than ten thousand suitors; and from these ten thousand one alone will be chosen for the unique kiss of an instant that shall wed him to death no less than to happiness; while the others will fly helplessly round the intertwined pair, and soon will perish without ever again beholding this prodigious and fatal apparition.

While she lives among them, the lovers around her have no idea what she truly is. They search for her in the distance, in the far depths of the horizon, never realizing that just moments ago they were with her, shared the same comb, even brushed against her in their eagerness to leave. One might almost think that their beautiful eyes, which shine like a glittering helmet, only recognize or desire her when she soars in the sky. Every day, from noon to three, when the sun shines brightly, this feathered group sets out to find the bride, who is more majestic and harder to win than the most distant princess from fairy tales. Twenty or thirty tribes rush from all the nearby cities, making her court consist of more than ten thousand suitors; and from these ten thousand, only one will be chosen for the unique kiss of a moment that will bind him to both death and happiness. The others will helplessly circle around the intertwined pair and soon perish without ever seeing this wondrous and deadly vision again.

{83}

{83}

I am not exaggerating this wild and amazing prodigality of nature. The best-conducted hives will, as a rule, contain four to five hundred males. Weaker or degenerate ones will often have as many as four or five thousand; for the more a hive inclines to its ruin, the more males will it produce. It may be said that, on an average, an apiary composed of ten colonies will at a given moment send an army of ten thousand males into the air, of whom ten or fifteen at most will have the occasion of performing the one act for which they were born.

I’m not exaggerating the incredible and astonishing abundance of nature. Well-managed hives usually have around four to five hundred males. Weaker or failing hives can have as many as four or five thousand, because the closer a hive gets to its downfall, the more males it produces. On average, an apiary with ten colonies will release an army of ten thousand males into the air at any one time, but only about ten or fifteen of them will actually get the chance to do the one thing they were born for.

In the meanwhile they exhaust the supplies of the city; each one of the parasites requiring the unceasing labour of five or six workers to maintain it in its abounding and voracious idleness, its activity being indeed solely confined to its jaws. But nature is always magnificent when dealing with the privileges and prerogatives of love. She becomes miserly only when doling out the organs and instruments of labour. She is especially severe on what men have termed virtue, whereas she strews the path of the most uninteresting lovers with innumerable jewels and favours. "Unite and multiply; there is no other law, or aim, than love," would seem to be her constant cry on all sides, while she mutters to herself, perhaps: "and exist afterwards if you can; that is no concern of mine." Do or desire what else we may, we find, everywhere on our road, this morality that differs so much from our own. And note, too, in these same little creatures, her unjust avarice and insensate waste. From her birth to her death, the austere forager has to travel abroad in search of the myriad flowers that hide in the depths of the thickets. She has to discover the honey and pollen that lurk in the labyrinths of the nectaries and in the most secret recesses of the anthers. And yet her eyes and olfactory organs are like the eyes and organs of the infirm, compared with those of the male. Were the drones almost blind, had they only the most rudimentary sense of smell, they scarcely would suffer. They have nothing to do, no prey to hunt down; their food is brought to them ready prepared, and their existence is spent in the obscurity of the hive, lapping honey from the comb. But they are the agents of love; and the most enormous, most useless gifts are flung with both hands into the abyss of the future. Out of a thousand of them, one only, once in his life, will have to seek, in the depths of the azure, the presence of the royal virgin. Out of a thousand one only will have, for one instant, to follow in space the female who desires not to escape. That suffices. The partial power flings open her treasury, wildly, even deliriously. To every one of these unlikely lovers, of whom nine hundred and ninety-nine will be put to death a few days after the fatal nuptials of the thousandth, she has given thirteen thousand eyes on each side of their head, while the worker has only six thousand. According to Cheshire's calculations, she has provided each of their antennae with thirty-seven thousand eight hundred olfactory cavities, while the worker has only five thousand in both. There we have an instance of the almost universal disproportion that exists between the gifts she rains upon love and her niggardly doles to labour; between the favours she accords to what shall, in an ecstasy, create new life, and the indifference wherewith she regards what will patiently have to maintain itself by toil. Whoever would seek faithfully to depict the character of nature, in accordance with the traits we discover here, would design an extraordinary figure, very foreign to our ideal, which nevertheless can only emanate from her. But too many things are unknown to man for him to essay such a portrait, wherein all would be deep shadow save one or two points of flickering light.

In the meantime, they drain the city's resources; each one of the parasites needs the constant effort of five or six workers to keep it in its abundant and greedy laziness, with its activity being limited to just its mouth. But nature is always spectacular when it comes to the privileges and perks of love. She becomes stingy only when it comes to giving out the tools and instruments of labor. She is especially harsh on what people call virtue, while she showers the most boring lovers with countless treasures and blessings. "Reproduce and multiply; there’s no other rule or goal, just love," seems to be her ongoing message everywhere, as she quietly thinks to herself, perhaps: "and exist afterwards if you can; that's not my problem." No matter what else we do or want, we find everywhere on our path this morality that is so different from our own. And notice too, in these tiny creatures, her unjust greed and reckless waste. From birth to death, the serious forager has to go out searching for the countless flowers hidden in the depths of the thickets. She has to find the honey and pollen that are tucked away in the intricate paths of the nectar glands and in the most secret corners of the anthers. Yet her eyes and sense of smell are like those of the impaired compared to the males. If the drones were nearly blind and only had the most basic sense of smell, they wouldn’t really suffer. They have nothing to do, no prey to chase; their food is served to them ready-made, and their lives are spent in the shadows of the hive, sipping honey from the comb. But they are the agents of love; and the largest, most pointless gifts are tossed with both hands into the void of the future. Out of a thousand of them, only one, once in his life, will need to search, amid the blue, for the presence of the royal virgin. Out of a thousand, only one will have, for one brief moment, to follow in space the female who doesn’t want to escape. That’s enough. The partial power throws open her treasury, wildly, even excitedly. To each of these unlikely lovers, of whom nine hundred and ninety-nine will be killed just a few days after the fateful wedding of the thousandth, she has given thirteen thousand eyes on each side of their head, while the workers only have six thousand. According to Cheshire's calculations, she has equipped each of their antennae with thirty-seven thousand eight hundred smell receptors, while the worker has only five thousand combined. Here we see an example of the almost universal imbalance between the gifts she showers upon love and her stingy offerings to labor; between the favors she grants to create new life in an ecstasy and the indifference she shows toward what must patiently sustain itself through hard work. Anyone attempting to faithfully depict nature’s character using these traits would create an extraordinary figure, quite different from our ideal, which still can only come from her. But there are too many unknowns for humankind to attempt such a portrait, where everything would be deep shadows except for one or two flickering points of light.

{84}

{84}

Very few, I imagine, have profaned the secret of the queen-bee's wedding, which comes to pass in the infinite, radiant circles of a beautiful sky. But we are able to witness the hesitating departure of the bride-elect and the murderous return of the bride.

Very few, I think, have spoiled the secret of the queen bee's wedding, which takes place in the endless, glowing circles of a beautiful sky. But we can see the nervous departure of the bride-to-be and the deadly return of the bride.

However great her impatience, she will yet choose her day and her hour, and linger in the shadow of the portal till a marvellous morning fling open wide the nuptial spaces in the depths of the great azure vault. She loves the moment when drops of dew still moisten the leaves and the flowers, when the last fragrance of dying dawn still wrestles with burning day, like a maiden caught in the arms of a heavy warrior; when through the silence of approaching noon is heard, once and again, a transparent cry that has lingered from sunrise.

However impatient she may be, she will still choose her day and time, and wait by the entrance until a beautiful morning opens up the wedding spaces in the depths of the vast blue sky. She loves the moment when drops of dew still wet the leaves and flowers, when the last scent of fading dawn still clashes with the heat of midday, like a young woman caught in the embrace of a strong warrior; when, through the quiet of the coming noon, a clear cry can be heard again and again, lingering from sunrise.

Then she appears on the threshold—in the midst of indifferent foragers, if she have left sisters in the hive; or surrounded by a delirious throng of workers, should it be impossible to fill her place.

Then she shows up at the entrance—in a crowd of indifferent foragers, if she has left sisters in the hive; or surrounded by a wild crowd of workers, if it's impossible to take her place.

She starts her flight backwards; returns twice or thrice to the alighting-board; and then, having definitely fixed in her mind the exact situation and aspect of the kingdom she has never yet seen from without, she departs like an arrow to the zenith of the blue. She soars to a height, a luminous zone, that other bees attain at no period of their life. Far away, caressing their idleness in the midst of the flowers, the males have beheld the apparition, have breathed the magnetic perfume that spreads from group to group till every apiary near is instinct with it. Immediately crowds collect, and follow her into the sea of gladness, whose limpid boundaries ever recede. She, drunk with her wings, obeying the magnificent law of the race that chooses her lover, and enacts that the strongest alone shall attain her in the solitude of the ether, she rises still; and, for the first time in her life, the blue morning air rushes into her stigmata, singing its song, like the blood of heaven, in the myriad tubes of the tracheal sacs, nourished on space, that fill the centre of her body. She rises still. A region must be found unhaunted by birds, that else might profane the mystery. She rises still; and already the ill-assorted troop below are dwindling and falling asunder. The feeble, infirm, the aged, unwelcome, ill-fed, who have flown from inactive or impoverished cities, these renounce the pursuit and disappear in the void. Only a small, indefatigable cluster remain, suspended in infinite opal. She summons her wings for one final effort; and now the chosen of incomprehensible forces has reached her, has seized her, and bounding aloft with united impetus, the ascending spiral of their intertwined flight whirls for one second in the hostile madness of love.

She takes off flying backward, returning two or three times to the launching platform; then, having clearly pictured the exact situation and appearance of the kingdom she has never seen from the outside, she zooms upward like an arrow into the blue sky. She climbs to a height, a bright zone, that no other bees reach at any point in their lives. Far below, enjoying their laziness among the flowers, the male bees notice her appearance and catch the intoxicating scent that spreads from group to group until every nearby hive is filled with it. Instantly, crowds gather and follow her into a joyful sea, its clear boundaries always receding. She, exhilarated by her wings, follows the glorious rule of her species that chooses her mate and declares that only the strongest shall reach her in the solitude of the sky. She climbs higher, and for the first time in her life, the blue morning air rushes into her stigmata, singing its song like the blood of heaven, filling her tracheal sacs, nourished by the vastness that fills her body. She continues to rise. A region must be found free from birds, which could otherwise disturb the mystery. She goes higher, and already the mismatched group below is shrinking and breaking apart. The weak, the sick, the old, the unwanted, the undernourished, who have flown from stagnant or struggling cities, give up the chase and vanish into the emptiness. Only a small, tireless cluster remains, suspended in infinite opal. She urges her wings for one last push; and now, the chosen by incomprehensible forces has reached her, has claimed her, and with their combined momentum, the spiraling ascent of their intertwined flight spins for one moment in the wild frenzy of love.

{85}

{85}

Most creatures have a vague belief that a very precarious hazard, a kind of transparent membrane, divides death from love; and that the profound idea of nature demands that the giver of life should die at the moment of giving. Here this idea, whose memory lingers still over the kisses of man, is realised in its primal simplicity. No sooner has the union been accomplished than the male's abdomen opens, the organ detaches itself, dragging with it the mass of the entrails; the wings relax, and, as though struck by lightning, the emptied body turns and turns on itself and sinks down into the abyss.

Most living beings have a vague sense that there's a fragile barrier, like a clear membrane, between death and love; and that nature's deep truth requires the life-giver to die at the moment of creation. Here, this concept, which still lingers in the kisses of humans, is realized in its most basic form. Immediately after the union takes place, the male's abdomen opens up, the organ separates, pulling along the mass of the intestines; the wings droop, and as if struck by lightning, the emptied body spins and spirals before sinking into the abyss.

The same idea that, before, in parthenogenesis, sacrificed the future of the hive to the unwonted multiplication of males, now sacrifices the male to the future of the hive.

The same idea that previously, in parthenogenesis, sacrificed the future of the hive for the unusual increase of males, now sacrifices the male for the future of the hive.

This idea is always astounding; and the further we penetrate into it, the fewer do our certitudes become. Darwin, for instance, to take the man of all men who studied it the most methodically and most passionately, Darwin, though scarcely confessing it to himself, loses confidence at every step, and retreats before the unexpected and the irreconcilable. Would you have before you the nobly humiliating spectacle of human genius battling with infinite power, you have but to follow Darwin's endeavours to unravel the strange, incoherent, inconceivably mysterious laws of the sterility and fecundity of hybrids, or of the variations of specific and generic characters. Scarcely has he formulated a principle when numberless exceptions assail him; and this very principle, soon completely overwhelmed, is glad to find refuge in some corner, and preserve a shred of existence there under the title of an exception.

This idea is always astounding, and the deeper we dive into it, the fewer certainties we have. Darwin, for example, the person who studied it most thoroughly and passionately, though he barely admits it to himself, loses confidence with every step and retreats from the unexpected and the unresolvable. If you want to witness the nobly humbling sight of human genius struggling against infinite power, just look at Darwin's efforts to understand the strange, chaotic, and incredibly mysterious laws of hybrid sterility and fertility, or the variations in species and genus traits. He hardly manages to establish a principle before countless exceptions bombard him; and this very principle, soon completely overwhelmed, is relieved to find a little refuge somewhere, holding on to a shred of existence under the name of an exception.

For the fact is that in hybridity, in variability (notably in the simultaneous variations known as correlations of growth), in instinct, in the processes of vital competition, in geologic succession and the geographic distribution of organised beings, in mutual affinities, as indeed in every other direction, the idea of nature reveals itself, in one and the same phenomenon and at the very same time, as circumspect and shiftless, niggard and prodigal, prudent and careless, fickle and stable, agitated and immovable, one and innumerable, magnificent and squalid. There lay open before her the immense and virgin fields of simplicity; she chose to people them with trivial errors, with petty contradictory laws that stray through existence like a flock of blind sheep. It is true that our eye, before which these things happen, can only reflect a reality proportionate to our needs and our stature; nor have we any warrant for believing that nature ever loses sight of her wandering results and causes.

The truth is that in hybrid forms, in variability (especially in the simultaneous changes known as growth correlations), in instincts, in the processes of natural competition, in geological succession and the geographical spread of living beings, in mutual relationships, and in every other aspect, the concept of nature shows itself, all at once and in the same instance, as careful yet aimless, stingy yet generous, wise yet reckless, unpredictable yet steady, restless yet unyielding, singular yet countless, impressive yet squalid. There lay before her vast and untamed fields of simplicity; she chose to fill them with trivial mistakes, with minor contradictory rules that wander through existence like a herd of blind sheep. It's true that our eyes, which witness all these things, can only reflect a reality that matches our needs and our level of understanding; we also have no basis for thinking that nature ever loses track of her wandering outcomes and causes.

In any event she will rarely permit them to stray too far, or approach illogical or dangerous regions. She disposes of two forces that never can err; and when the phenomenon shall have trespassed beyond certain limits, she will beckon to life or to death—which arrives, re-establishes order, and unconcernedly marks out the path afresh.

In any case, she rarely allows them to wander too far or get into illogical or dangerous areas. She uses two forces that can never go wrong; when the situation crosses certain boundaries, she will call for life or death—which comes, restores order, and calmly maps out the path again.

{86}

{86}

She eludes us on every side; she repudiates most of our rules and breaks our standards to pieces. On our right she sinks far beneath the level of our thoughts, on our left she towers mountain-high above them. She appears to be constantly blundering, no less in the world of her first experiments than in that of her last, of man. There she invests with her sanction the instincts of the obscure mass, the unconscious injustice of the multitude, the defeat of intelligence and virtue, the uninspired morality which urges on the great wave of the race, though manifestly inferior to the morality that could be conceived or desired by the minds composing the small and the clearer wave that ascends the other. And yet, can such a mind be wrong if it ask itself whether the whole truth—moral truths, therefore, as well as non-moral—had not better be sought in this chaos than in itself, where these truths would seem comparatively clear and precise?

She escapes us on every side; she ignores most of our rules and shatters our standards. On the right, she sinks far below our level of thought; on the left, she rises mountain-high above it. She seems to be constantly making mistakes, not just in her initial experiments but also in her later ones with humanity. In doing so, she endorses the instincts of the obscure masses, the unconscious injustice of the crowd, the failure of intelligence and virtue, and the uninspired morality that drives the great wave of the race, even though it's clearly inferior to the morality that could be imagined or desired by the minds of the smaller, clearer wave that rises on the other side. And yet, can such a mind be mistaken if it wonders whether the whole truth—moral truths as well as non-moral ones—might be better discovered in this chaos than within itself, where these truths would seem comparatively clear and precise?

The man who feels thus will never attempt to deny the reason or virtue of his ideal, hallowed by so many heroes and sages; but there are times when he will whisper to himself that this ideal has perhaps been formed at too great a distance from the enormous mass whose diverse beauty it would fain represent. He has, hitherto, legitimately feared that the attempt to adapt his morality to that of nature would risk the destruction of what was her masterpiece. But to-day he understands her a little better; and from some of her replies, which, though still vague, reveal an unexpected breadth, he has been enabled to seize a glimpse of a plan and an intellect vaster than could be conceived by his unaided imagination; wherefore he has grown less afraid, nor feels any longer the same imperious need of the refuge his own special virtue and reason afford him. He concludes that what is so great could surely teach nothing that would tend to lessen itself. He wonders whether the moment may not have arrived for submitting to a more judicious examination his convictions, his principles, and his dreams.

The man who feels this way will never try to deny the reasoning or value of his ideal, which has been honored by many heroes and sages; however, there are times when he quietly tells himself that this ideal may have been shaped from too far away from the vast mass of diverse beauty it aims to represent. Until now, he has rightfully feared that trying to align his morality with that of nature could threaten the destruction of what is her greatest creation. But today, he understands her a bit better; from some of her responses, which, while still unclear, show an unexpected depth, he has caught a glimpse of a plan and intelligence far greater than he could have imagined on his own. As a result, he feels less fearful and no longer has the same urgent need for the comfort that his own specific virtue and reasoning provide. He wonders if the time has come to more carefully examine his beliefs, principles, and dreams.

Once more, he has not the slightest desire to abandon his human ideal. That even which at first diverts him from this ideal teaches him to return to it. It were impossible for nature to give ill advice to a man who declines to include in the great scheme he is endeavouring to grasp, who declines to regard as sufficiently lofty to be definitive, any truth that is not at least as lofty as the truth he himself desires. Nothing shifts its place in his life save only to rise with him; and he knows he is rising when he finds himself drawing near to his ancient image of good. But all things transform themselves more freely in his thoughts; and he can descend with impunity, for he has the presentiment that numbers of successive valleys will lead him to the plateau that he expects. And, while he thus seeks for conviction, while his researches even conduct him to the very reverse of that which he loves, he directs his conduct by the most humanly beautiful truth, and clings to the one that provisionally seems to be highest. All that may add to beneficent virtue enters his heart at once; all that would tend to lessen it remaining there in suspense, like insoluble salts that change not till the hour for decisive experiment. He may accept an inferior truth, but before he will act in accordance therewith he will wait, if need be for centuries, until he perceive the connection this truth must possess with truths so infinite as to include and surpass all others.

Once again, he has no desire to give up on his ideal of humanity. Even those things that initially distract him from this ideal teach him to return to it. It's impossible for nature to lead a man astray who refuses to include in the grand scheme he is trying to understand, who won't consider any truth that isn’t at least as noble as the truth he seeks. Nothing in his life changes except to rise alongside him; and he knows he's advancing when he feels himself getting closer to his timeless concept of good. However, everything can transform more freely in his thoughts; he can explore lower truths without fear, as he senses that many valleys will eventually lead him to the plateau he desires. And while he searches for conviction, even if his inquiries take him to the opposite of what he loves, he guides his actions by the most beautifully human truth and holds onto the one that currently seems the most elevated. Anything that might enhance his virtuousness enters his heart immediately; anything that could diminish it lingers there, like insoluble salts that only change when the moment for a decisive test arrives. He may accept a lesser truth, but before he acts on it, he will wait, if necessary for centuries, until he perceives the connection this truth must have with truths so vast that they encompass and exceed all others.

In a word, he divides the moral from the intellectual order, admitting in the former that only which is greater and more beautiful than was there before. And blameworthy as it may be to separate the two orders in cases, only too frequent in life, where we suffer our conduct to be inferior to our thoughts, where, seeing the good, we follow the worse—to see the worse and follow the better, to raise our actions high over our idea, must ever be reasonable and salutary; for human experience renders it daily more clear that the highest thought we can attain will long be inferior still to the mysterious truth we seek. Moreover, should nothing of what goes before be true, a reason more simple and more familiar would counsel him not yet to abandon his human ideal. For the more strength he accords to the laws which would seem to set egoism, injustice, and cruelty as examples for men to follow, the more strength does be at the same time confer on the others that ordain generosity, justice, and pity; and these last laws are found to contain something as profoundly natural as the first, the moment he begins to equalise, or allot more methodically, the share he attributes to the universe and to himself.

In short, he separates moral values from intellectual ideas, recognizing that in the moral realm, only what is greater and more beautiful than what existed before should be accepted. While it can be criticized to distinguish between these two aspects in situations, which are too common in life, where we allow our behavior to fall short of our ideals, realizing the good but choosing the lesser path—it is always reasonable and beneficial to recognize the lesser and strive for the better, elevating our actions above our thoughts. Human experience increasingly shows that the highest ideas we can reach will always be lower than the profound truth we are seeking. Furthermore, even if everything stated before is untrue, a simpler and more familiar reason would still encourage him not to abandon his human ideals. The more importance he gives to the laws that appear to promote egoism, injustice, and cruelty as models for others to follow, the more he simultaneously reinforces the ideals of generosity, justice, and compassion; these latter principles are just as inherently natural as the former, the moment he starts to balance or systematically allocate the contributions he assigns to the universe and to himself.

{87}

{87}

Let us return to the tragic nuptials of the queen. Here it is evidently nature's wish, in the interests of crossed fertilisation, that the union of the drone and the queen-bee should be possible only in the open sky. But her desires blend network-fashion, and her most valued laws have to pass through the meshes of other laws, which, in their turn, the moment after, are compelled to pass through the first.

Let’s go back to the queen’s tragic marriage. It’s clear that nature intends for the drone and queen bee to unite only in the open air, for the sake of cross-fertilization. However, her wishes intertwine like a network, and her most important laws have to navigate through the filters of other laws, which, in turn, are forced to comply with the first right after.

In the sky she has planted so many dangers—cold winds, storm-currents, birds, insects, drops of water, all of which also obey invincible laws—that she must of necessity arrange for this union to be as brief as possible. It is so, thanks to the startlingly sudden death of the male. One embrace suffices; the rest all enacts itself in the very flanks of the bride.

In the sky, she has set up numerous dangers—cold winds, storm currents, birds, insects, drops of water—all of which follow unstoppable laws. Therefore, she must ensure that this union is as short as possible. And it is, due to the shockingly quick death of the male. One embrace is enough; everything else happens right in the flanks of the bride.

She descends from the azure heights and returns to the hive, trailing behind her, like an oriflamme, the unfolded entrails of her lover. Some writers pretend that the bees manifest great joy at this return so big with promise—Buchner, among others, giving a detailed account of it. I have many a time lain in wait for the queen-bee's return, and I confess that I have never noticed any unusual emotion except in the case of a young queen who had gone forth at the head of a swarm, and represented the unique hope of a newly founded and still empty city. In that instance the workers were all wildly excited, and rushed to meet her. But as a rule they appear to forget her, even though the future of their city will often be no less imperilled. They act with consistent prudence in all things, till the moment when they authorise the massacre of the rival queens. That point reached, their instinct halts; and there is, as it were, a gap in their foresight.—They appear to be wholly indifferent. They raise their heads; recognise, probably, the murderous tokens of impregnation; but, still mistrustful, manifest none of the gladness our expectation had pictured. Being positive in their ways, and slow at illusion, they probably need further proofs before permitting themselves to rejoice. Why endeavour to render too logical, or too human, the feelings of little creatures so different from ourselves? Neither among the bees nor among any other animals that have a ray of our intellect, do things happen with the precision our books record. Too many circumstances remain unknown to us. Why try to depict the bees as more perfect than they are, by saying that which is not? Those who would deem them more interesting did they resemble ourselves, have not yet truly realised what it is that should awaken the interest of a sincere mind. The aim of the observer is not to surprise, but to comprehend; and to point out the gaps existing in an intellect, and the signs of a cerebral organisation different from our own, is more curious by far than the relating of mere marvels concerning it.

She comes down from the blue heights and returns to the hive, trailing behind her, like a banner, the exposed remains of her lover. Some writers claim that the bees show great joy at her return, which is full of promise—Buchner, among others, provides a detailed account of it. I’ve often waited for the queen bee’s return, and I admit that I’ve never noticed any unusual excitement, except in the case of a young queen who had left at the head of a swarm, representing the unique hope of a newly established and still empty colony. In that instance, the workers were all incredibly excited and rushed to meet her. But usually, they seem to forget her, even though the future of their colony is often just as endangered. They act with consistent caution in everything, until the moment they permit the slaughter of rival queens. Once that moment comes, their instinct stops; and there seems to be a gap in their foresight. They appear to be entirely indifferent. They lift their heads and likely recognize the deadly signs of impregnation; but still wary, they show none of the joy we expected. Being straightforward in their behavior and slow to illusion, they probably need more evidence before allowing themselves to celebrate. Why try to make the feelings of these little creatures too logical or too human? Neither among the bees nor any other animals that possess a hint of our intellect do things happen with the precision our books state. Too many factors remain unknown to us. Why attempt to portray the bees as more perfect than they are, by claiming what isn’t true? Those who think they would be more interesting if they were like us have not yet truly understood what should capture the interest of a sincere mind. The goal of the observer is not to astonish, but to understand; and pointing out the gaps in their intellect and the signs of a brain structure different from our own is far more fascinating than simply recounting wonders about it.

But this indifference is not shared by all; and when the breathless queen has reached the alighting-board, some groups will form and accompany her into the hive; where the sun, hero of every festivity in which the bees take part, is entering with little timid steps, and bathing in azure and shadow the waxen walls and curtains of honey. Nor does the new bride, indeed, show more concern than her people, there being not room for many emotions in her narrow, barbarous, practical brain. She has but one thought, which is to rid herself as quickly as possible of the embarrassing souvenirs her consort has left her, whereby her movements are hampered. She seats herself on the threshold, and carefully strips off the useless organs, that are borne far away by the workers; for the male has given her all he possessed, and much more than she requires. She retains only, in her spermatheca, the seminal liquid where millions of germs are floating, which, until her last day, will issue one by one, as the eggs pass by, and in the obscurity of her body accomplish the mysterious union of the male and female element, whence the worker-bees are born. Through a curious inversion, it is she who furnishes the male principle, and the drone who provides the female. Two days after the union she lays her first eggs, and her people immediately surround her with the most particular care. From that moment, possessed of a dual sex, having within her an inexhaustible male, she begins her veritable life; she will never again leave the hive, unless to accompany a swarm; and her fecundity will cease only at the approach of death.

But not everyone feels indifferent; when the breathless queen makes it to the landing board, some groups form and follow her into the hive. The sun, the star of every celebration the bees enjoy, enters timidly, lighting up the waxy walls and the drapes of honey with its warmth. The new bride doesn't seem to care much either, as there's barely space for many feelings in her small, practical mind. Her only thought is to get rid of the awkward souvenirs her mate left behind as quickly as possible, since they slow her down. She sits at the threshold and carefully removes the unnecessary parts, which the workers carry far away; the male has given her everything he had, and more than she needs. She keeps only the seminal fluid in her spermatheca, where millions of cells are floating. These will be released one by one as she lays eggs, facilitating the mysterious union of male and female that produces the worker bees. Oddly enough, she supplies the male element, while the drone offers the female. Two days after mating, she lays her first eggs, and her workers immediately surround her with meticulous care. From that moment, possessing both sexes and with an endless supply of male material within her, she begins her true life; she will never leave the hive again except to join a swarm, and her ability to reproduce will last only until her death approaches.

{88}

{88}

Prodigious nuptials these, the most fairylike that can be conceived, azure and tragic, raised high above life by the impetus of desire; imperishable and terrible, unique and bewildering, solitary and infinite. An admirable ecstasy, wherein death supervening in all that our sphere has of most limpid and loveliest, in virginal, limitless space, stamps the instant of happiness in the sublime transparence of the great sky; purifying in that immaculate light the something of wretchedness that always hovers around love, rendering the kiss one that can never be forgotten; and, content this time with moderate tithe, proceeding herself, with hands that are almost maternal, to introduce and unite, in one body, for a long and inseparable future, two little fragile lives.

Incredible weddings these, the most magical you can imagine, beautiful and tragic, lifted above life by pure longing; eternal and intense, unique and confusing, alone and endless. A remarkable ecstasy, where death arrives amidst everything our world has of the clearest and loveliest, in pure, boundless space, marks the moment of joy in the sublime clarity of the vast sky; cleansing in that spotless light the hint of sadness that always lingers around love, making the kiss unforgettable; and, this time content with a modest offering, she herself, with hands that feel almost motherly, brings together and merges, into one being, for a long and inseparable future, two delicate little lives.

Profound truth has not this poetry, but possesses another that we are less apt to grasp, which, however, we should end, perhaps, by understanding and loving. Nature has not gone out of her way to provide these two "abbreviated atoms," as Pascal would call them, with a resplendent marriage, or an ideal moment of love. Her concern, as we have said, was merely to improve the race by means of crossed fertilisation. To ensure this she has contrived the organ of the male in such a fashion that he can make use of it only in space. A prolonged flight must first expand his two great tracheal sacs; these enormous receptacles being gorged on air will throw back the lower part of the abdomen, and permit the exsertion of the organ. There we have the whole physiological secret—which will seem ordinary enough to some, and almost vulgar to others—of this dazzling pursuit and these magnificent nuptials.

Profound truth doesn’t have this poetry, but it has another kind that we’re less likely to understand, which, in the end, we might come to grasp and appreciate. Nature hasn’t gone out of her way to give these two “abbreviated atoms,” as Pascal would call them, a splendid union or an ideal moment of love. As we've pointed out, her main goal was simply to improve the species through cross-fertilization. To make this happen, she designed the male organ in such a way that it can only be used in space. A long flight must first inflate his two large tracheal sacs; these huge receptacles, filled with air, will push back the lower part of the abdomen, allowing the organ to extend. That’s the whole physiological secret—which might seem pretty ordinary to some and almost tacky to others—behind this dazzling pursuit and these magnificent unions.

{89}

{89}

"But must we always, then," the poet will wonder, "rejoice in regions that are loftier than the truth?"

"But do we always have to," the poet will wonder, "celebrate in places that are higher than the truth?"

Yes, in all things, at all times, let us rejoice, not in regions loftier than the truth, for that were impossible, but in regions higher than the little truths that our eye can seize. Should a chance, a recollection, an illusion, a passion,—in a word, should any motive whatever cause an object to reveal itself to us in a more beautiful light than to others, let that motive be first of all dear to us. It may only be error, perhaps; but this error will not prevent the moment wherein this object appears the most admirable to us from being the moment wherein we are likeliest to perceive its real beauty. The beauty we lend it directs our attention to its veritable beauty and grandeur, which, derived as they are from the relation wherein every object must of necessity stand to general, eternal, forces and laws, might otherwise escape observation. The faculty of admiring which an illusion may have created within us will serve for the truth that must come, be it sooner or later. It is with the words, the feelings, and ardour created by ancient and imaginary beauties, that humanity welcomes today truths which perhaps would have never been born, which might not have been able to find so propitious a home, had these sacrificed illusions not first of all dwelt in, and kindled, the heart and the reason whereinto these truths should descend. Happy the eyes that need no illusion to see that the spectacle is great! It is illusion that teaches the others to look, to admire, and rejoice. And look as high as they will, they never can look too high. Truth rises as they draw nearer; they draw nearer when they admire. And whatever the heights may be whereon they rejoice, this rejoicing can never take place in the void, or above the unknown and eternal truth that rests over all things like beauty in suspense.

Yes, in everything, at all times, let’s celebrate, not in realms beyond the truth, since that’s impossible, but in areas beyond the small truths we can grasp. If a chance, a memory, an illusion, or a passion—basically, if any reason causes something to appear to us more beautifully than to others, let that reason be dear to us first. It might just be a mistake, but this mistake won’t stop the moment when this thing seems most admirable to us from being the moment when we’re most likely to see its true beauty. The beauty we attribute to it helps us focus on its genuine beauty and greatness, which, since they stem from the relationship every object has with universal, eternal forces and laws, might otherwise go unnoticed. The ability to admire, which an illusion might have sparked in us, will facilitate the truth that’s bound to come, whether soon or later. It’s with the words, feelings, and passion created by ancient and imagined beauties that humanity embraces truths today that might never have emerged or found such a welcoming home without those cherished illusions first inspiring and igniting the hearts and minds that these truths will enter. Blessed are the eyes that don’t need an illusion to recognize that the spectacle is magnificent! It’s the illusion that teaches others to look, to admire, and to rejoice. And no matter how high they aim, they can never aim too high. Truth rises as they come closer; they come closer when they admire. And regardless of how lofty their rejoicing may be, it can never occur in a void or above the unknown and eternal truth that overshadows everything like beauty in suspense.

{90}

{90}

Does this mean that we should attach ourselves to falsehood, to an unreal and factitious poetry, and find our gladness therein for want of anything better? Or that in the example before us—in itself nothing, but we dwell on it because it stands for a thousand others, as also for our entire attitude in face of divers orders of truths—that here we should ignore the physiological explanation, and retain and taste only the emotions of this nuptial flight, which is yet, and whatever the cause, one of the most lyrical, most beautiful acts of that suddenly disinterested, irresistible force which all living creatures obey and are wont to call love? That were too childish; nor is it possible, thanks to the excellent habits every loyal mind has today acquired.

Does this mean we should cling to falsehoods, to a fake and artificial poetry, and find happiness in that because we can't find anything better? Or that in the example in front of us—in itself nothing, but we focus on it because it represents a thousand others, and our overall attitude towards various truths—that we should ignore the physiological explanation and only hold onto the feelings of this wedding journey, which is still, no matter the reason, one of the most lyrical and beautiful acts of that sudden, selfless, irresistible force that all living beings follow and call love? That would be too naive; it's also impossible, thanks to the great habits that every loyal mind has developed today.

The fact being incontestable, we must evidently admit that the exsertion of the organ is rendered possible only by the expansion of the tracheal vesicles. But if we, content with this fact, did not let our eyes roam beyond it; if we deduced therefrom that every thought that rises too high or wanders too far must be of necessity wrong, and that truth must be looked for only in the material details; if we did not seek, no matter where, in uncertainties often far greater than the one this little explanation has solved, in the strange mystery of crossed fertilisation for instance, or in the perpetuity of the race and life, or in the scheme of nature; if we did not seek in these for something beyond the current explanation, something that should prolong it, and conduct us to the beauty and grandeur that repose in the unknown, I would almost venture to assert that we should pass our existence further away from the truth than those, even, who in this case wilfully shut their eyes to all save the poetic and wholly imaginary interpretation of these marvellous nuptials. They evidently misjudge the form and colour of the truth, but they live in its atmosphere and its influence far more than the others, who complacently believe that the entire truth lies captive within their two hands. For the first have made ample preparations to receive the truth, have provided most hospitable lodging within them; and even though their eyes may not see it, they are eagerly looking towards the beauty and grandeur where its residence surely must be.

The undeniable fact is that the functioning of the organ is made possible only by the expansion of the tracheal vesicles. But if we, satisfied with this fact, don't look beyond it; if we conclude that every thought that reaches too high or goes too far must be wrong, and that we can only find truth in the material details; if we don't explore, no matter where, in uncertainties that are often much greater than the small explanation we've just discussed, such as the strange mystery of cross-fertilization, the continuity of the species and life, or the design of nature; if we don't seek something beyond the current explanation, something that can extend it and lead us to the beauty and greatness found in the unknown, I might almost argue that we would be living further from the truth than those who, even in this case, willfully ignore everything except the poetic and entirely imaginary interpretation of these marvelous unions. They clearly misunderstand the form and essence of the truth, but they exist within its atmosphere and influence far more than those who complacently believe that the whole truth lies entirely in their grasp. The former have made ample preparations to embrace the truth, providing a welcoming space within themselves; and even if their eyes do not see it, they are eagerly looking toward the beauty and grandeur where its true home must surely be.

We know nothing of nature's aim, which for us is the truth that dominates every other. But for the very love of this truth, and to preserve in our soul the ardour we need for its search, it behoves us to deem it great. And if we should find one day that we have been on a wrong road, that this aim is incoherent and petty, we shall have discovered its pettiness by means of the very zeal its presumed grandeur had created within us; and this pettiness once established, it will teach us what we have to do. In the meanwhile it cannot be unwise to devote to its search the most strenuous, daring efforts of our heart and our reason. And should the last word of all this be wretched, it will be no little achievement to have laid bare the inanity and the pettiness of the aim of nature.

We know nothing about nature's purpose, which for us is the truth that overshadows everything else. But for the love of this truth, and to keep in our souls the passion we need for its pursuit, we should consider it significant. And if one day we realize we've been on the wrong path, that this purpose is inconsistent and trivial, we’ll have uncovered its triviality through the very enthusiasm its supposed grandeur inspired in us; and once we recognize this triviality, it will guide us on what to do next. In the meantime, it’s not foolish to dedicate our deepest, boldest efforts of heart and mind to seeking it. And even if the ultimate realization is disheartening, it will still be a considerable achievement to reveal the emptiness and triviality of nature's purpose.

"There is no truth for us yet," a great physiologist of our day remarked to me once, as I walked with him in the country; "there is no truth yet, but there are everywhere three very good semblances of truth. Each man makes his own choice, or rather, perhaps, has it thrust upon him; and this choice, whether it be thrust upon him, or whether, as is often the case, he have made it without due reflection, this choice, to which he clings, will determine the form and the conduct of all that enters within him. The friend whom we meet, the woman who approaches and smiles, the love that unlocks our heart, the death or sorrow that seals it, the September sky above us, this superb and delightful garden, wherein we see, as in Corneille's 'Psyche,' bowers of greenery resting on gilded statues, and the flocks grazing yonder, with their shepherd asleep, and the last houses of the village, and the sea between the trees,—all these are raised or degraded before they enter within us, are adorned or despoiled, in accordance with the little signal this choice of ours makes to them. We must learn to select from among these semblances of truth. I have spent my own life in eager search for the smaller truths, the physical causes; and now, at the end of my days, I begin to cherish, not what would lead me from these, but what would precede them, and, above all, what would somewhat surpass them." We had attained the summit of a plateau in the "pays de Caux," in Normandy, which is supple as an English park, but natural and limitless. It is one of the rare spots on the globe where nature reveals herself to us unfailingly wholesome and green. A little further to the north the country is threatened with barrenness, a little further to the south, it is fatigued and scorched by the sun. At the end of a plain that ran down to the edge of the sea, some peasants were erecting a stack of corn. "Look," he said, "seen from here, they are beautiful. They are constructing that simple and yet so important thing, which is above all else the happy and almost unvarying monument of human life taking root—a stack of corn. The distance, the air of the evening, weave their joyous cries into a kind of song without words, which replies to the noble song of the leaves as they whisper over our heads. Above them the sky is magnificent; and one almost might fancy that beneficent spirits, waving palm-trees of fire, had swept all the light towards the stack, to give the workers more time. And the track of the palms still remains in the sky. See the humble church by their side, overlooking and watching them, in the midst of the rounded lime trees and the grass of the homely graveyard, that faces its native ocean. They are fitly erecting their monument of life underneath the monuments of their dead, who made the same gestures and still are with them. Take in the whole picture. There are no special, characteristic features, such as we find in England, Provence, or Holland. It is the presentment, large and ordinary enough to be symbolic, of a natural and happy life. Observe how rhythmic human existence becomes in its useful moments. Look at the man who is leading the horses, at that other who throws up the sheaves on his fork, at the women bending over the corn, and the children at play. ... They have not displaced a stone, or removed a spadeful of earth, to add to the beauty of the scenery; nor do they take one step, plant a tree or a flower, that is not necessary. All that we see is merely the involuntary result of the effort that man puts forth to subsist for a moment in nature; and yet those among us whose desire is only to create or imagine spectacles of peace, deep thoughtfulness, or beatitude, have been able to find no scene more perfect than this, which indeed they paint or describe whenever they seek to present us with a picture of beauty or happiness. Here we have the first semblance, which some will call the truth."

"There’s no real truth for us yet," a well-known physiologist of our time said to me once as we walked through the countryside. "There’s no truth yet, but there are three very solid appearances of truth everywhere. Each person makes their own choice, or maybe that choice is forced upon them; and this choice, whether it’s imposed or made without much thought—this choice they hold onto—determines how all things enter within them. The friend we encounter, the woman who comes close and smiles, the love that opens our hearts, the death or sadness that shuts them, the September sky above us, this beautiful and enchanting garden, where we see, like in Corneille's 'Psyche,' green arbors resting on golden statues, the flocks grazing over there with their shepherd asleep, and the last houses of the village along with the sea peeking through the trees—all these things are elevated or diminished before they come into us, adorned or stripped, based on the little signal our choice sends to them. We must learn to choose among these appearances of truth. I’ve dedicated my life to the search for the smaller truths, the physical causes; and now, at the end of my days, I begin to value not what will lead me away from them, but what comes before them, and above all, what might even surpass them." We had reached the top of a plateau in the "pays de Caux" in Normandy, which is as flexible as an English park, yet natural and boundless. It’s one of those rare places on Earth where nature shows herself beautifully fresh and green. A little further north, the land faces barrenness; a little further south, it’s weary and scorched by the sun. At the end of a plain running down to the sea, some farmers were building a stack of grain. "Look," he said, "from here, they look beautiful. They’re creating that simple yet essential thing, which above all is the happy and almost constant monument of human life taking root—a grain stack. The distance and the evening air weave their joyful shouts into a kind of wordless song, responding to the noble song of the leaves whispering above us. The sky above them is stunning; one might almost believe that benevolent spirits, waving fiery palm trees, have swept all the light toward the stack to give the workers more time. And the trace of the palms still lingers in the sky. See the humble church beside them, overseeing and watching over them, nestled among the round lime trees and the grass of the simple graveyard that faces its native ocean. They are rightly raising their monument of life beneath the monuments of their dead, who made the same gestures and are still with them. Take in the whole scene. There are no special, unique features like we find in England, Provence, or Holland. It’s a broad representation, ordinary enough to be symbolic of a natural and happy life. Notice how rhythmic human existence becomes in its useful moments. Look at the man guiding the horses, the other tossing up the sheaves with his fork, the women bending over the grain, and the children at play... They haven’t shifted a stone or removed a shovelful of earth to enhance the beauty of the landscape; nor do they take a step, plant a tree, or flower that isn’t necessary. Everything we see is just the natural outcome of the effort people put in to survive for a moment in nature; and yet those among us who only wish to create or imagine scenes of peace, deep thoughtfulness, or bliss have found no scene more perfect than this, which they indeed paint or describe whenever they aim to present us with a picture of beauty or happiness. Here is the first semblance, which some will call the truth."

{92}

{92}

"Let us draw nearer. Can you distinguish the song that blended so well with the whispering of the leaves? It is made up of abuse and insult; and when laughter bursts forth, it is due to an obscene remark some man or woman has made, to a jest at the expense of the weaker,—of the hunchback unable to lift his load, the cripple they have knocked over, or the idiot whom they make their butt.

"Come closer. Can you hear the song that mixes perfectly with the rustling of the leaves? It's filled with insults and put-downs; and when laughter erupts, it's because of a crude comment someone has made, a joke at the expense of the vulnerable—the hunchback struggling to carry his burden, the disabled person they've pushed down, or the fool they target with their mockery."

"I have studied these people for many years. We are in Normandy; the soil is rich and easily tilled. Around this stack of corn there is rather more comfort than one would usually associate with a scene of this kind. The result is that most of the men, and many of the women, are alcoholic. Another poison also, which I need not name, corrodes the race. To that, to the alcohol, are due the children whom you see there: the dwarf, the one with the hare-lip, the others who are knock-kneed, scrofulous, imbecile. All of them, men and women, young and old, have the ordinary vices of the peasant. They are brutal, suspicious, grasping, and envious; hypocrites, liars, and slanderers; inclined to petty, illicit profits, mean interpretations, and coarse flattery of the stronger. Necessity brings them together, and compels them to help each other; but the secret wish of every individual is to harm his neighbour as soon as this can be done without danger to himself. The one substantial pleasure of the village is procured by the sorrows of others. Should a great disaster befall one of them, it will long be the subject of secret, delighted comment among the rest. Every man watches his fellow, is jealous of him, detests and despises him. While they are poor, they hate their masters with a boiling and pent-up hatred because of the harshness and avarice these last display; should they in their turn have servants, they profit by their own experience of servitude to reveal a harshness and avarice greater even than that from which they have suffered. I could give you minutest details of the meanness, deceit, injustice, tyranny, and malice that underlie this picture of ethereal, peaceful toil. Do not imagine that the sight of this marvellous sky, of the sea which spreads out yonder behind the church and presents another, more sensitive sky, flowing over the earth like a great mirror of wisdom and consciousness—do not imagine that either sea or sky is capable of lifting their thoughts or widening their minds. They have never looked at them. Nothing has power to influence or move them save three or four circumscribed fears, that of hunger, of force, of opinion and law, and the terror of hell when they die. To show what they are, we should have to consider them one by one. See that tall fellow there on the right, who flings up such mighty sheaves. Last summer his friends broke his right arm in some tavern row. I reduced the fracture, which was a bad and compound one. I tended him for a long time, and gave him the wherewithal to live till he should be able to get back to work. He came to me every day. He profited by this to spread the report in the village that he had discovered me in the arms of my sister-in-law, and that my mother drank. He is not vicious, he bears me no ill-will; on the contrary, see what a broad, open smile spreads over his face as he sees me. It was not social animosity that induced him to slander me. The peasant values wealth far too much to hate the rich man. But I fancy my good corn-thrower there could not understand my tending him without any profit to myself. He was satisfied that there must be some underhand scheme, and he declined to be my dupe. More than one before him, richer or poorer, has acted in similar fashion, if not worse. It did not occur to him that he was lying when he spread those inventions abroad; he merely obeyed a confused command of the morality he saw about him. He yielded unconsciously, against his will, as it were, to the all-powerful desire of the general malevolence.... But why complete a picture with which all are familiar who have spent some years in the country? Here we have the second semblance that some will call the real truth. It is the truth of practical life. It undoubtedly is based on the most precise, the only, facts that one can observe and test."

"I've studied these people for many years. We're in Normandy; the soil is rich and easy to farm. Around this pile of corn, there's a bit more comfort than one would usually expect in a scene like this. Because of that, most of the men, and many of the women, are alcoholics. There's also another poison, which I don't need to name, that damages the community. Because of that, and the alcohol, you see the children there: the dwarf, the one with the hare-lip, the others who are knock-kneed, sickly, mentally impaired. All of them, men and women, young and old, have the usual flaws of rural life. They are brutal, suspicious, greedy, and envious; hypocrites, liars, and gossipers; prone to small, illegal gains, harsh judgments, and flattery of those with more power. Necessity brings them together and forces them to help each other; but deep down, each person wishes to harm their neighbor as soon as they can do so without putting themselves at risk. The one real pleasure in the village comes from the misfortunes of others. If a major disaster strikes one of them, it will be whispered about with secret delight for a long time among the rest. Every man keeps an eye on his neighbors, feels jealousy toward them, and harbors contempt for them. While they are poor, they seethe with pent-up hatred for their masters due to the harshness and greed these masters show; if they ever have servants, they use their own experience of being servants to become even more harsh and greedy than they suffered under. I could give you the tiniest details of the meanness, deceit, injustice, tyranny, and malice that lie behind this image of serene, peaceful labor. Don't imagine that the sight of this beautiful sky, or the sea that stretches out beyond the church and reflects a more sensitive sky, can inspire them or broaden their minds. They’ve never really looked at them. Nothing influences or moves them except for a few limited fears—fear of hunger, fear of power, fear of public opinion and law, and the terror of hell when they die. To show what they really are, we should consider them individually. Look at that tall guy over there on the right, who throws up those huge bundles. Last summer, his friends broke his right arm in a bar fight. I set the fracture, which was bad and complex. I cared for him for a long time and helped him with what he needed to live until he could get back to work. He came to see me every day. He took that opportunity to spread rumors around the village that he found me in a compromising situation with my sister-in-law, and that my mother drank. He’s not malicious, he doesn’t hold a grudge against me; on the contrary, look at the broad smile that spreads across his face when he sees me. It wasn’t social hostility that drove him to slander me. The peasant values money way too much to hate a wealthy person. But I think my good fellow there couldn’t understand my caring for him without any benefit to myself. He assumed there must be some secret motive, and he refused to let himself be fooled. More than one before him, whether richer or poorer, has acted in the same or even worse way. It didn’t occur to him that he was lying when he spread those stories; he simply followed a confused sense of the morality he saw around him. He unconsciously, almost against his will, gave in to the overpowering instinct of collective malice... But why draw a complete picture that everyone who has spent some years in the countryside is already familiar with? Here we have the second likeness that some will call the real truth. It’s the truth of practical life. It is undoubtedly based on the most precise and only facts that can be observed and tested."

{93}

{93}

"Let us sit on these sheaves," he continued, "and look again. Let us reject not a single one of the little facts that build up the reality of which I have spoken. Let us permit them to depart of their own accord into space. They cumber the foreground, and yet we cannot but be aware of the existence behind them of a great and very curious force that sustains the whole. Does it only sustain and not raise? These men whom we see before us are at least no longer the ferocious animals of whom La Bruyere speaks, the wretches who talked in a kind of inarticulate voice, and withdrew at night to their dens, where they lived on black bread, water, and roots.

"Let’s sit on these bundles," he continued, "and take another look. Let’s not dismiss a single one of the little details that make up the reality I mentioned. Let’s allow them to drift away into space on their own. They clutter the front, but we can’t help but notice the great and intriguing force behind them that supports everything. Does it only support and not elevate? These men we see in front of us are certainly no longer the savage creatures La Bruyère described, the unfortunate souls who spoke in a sort of mumble and retreated at night to their hideouts, where they survived on stale bread, water, and roots."

"The race, you will tell me, is neither as strong nor as healthy. That may be; alcohol and the other scourge are accidents that humanity has to surmount; ordeals, it may be, by which certain of our organs, those of the nerves, for instance, may benefit; for we invariably find that life profits by the ills that it overcomes. Besides, a mere trifle that we may discover to-morrow may render these poisons innocuous. These men have thoughts and feelings that those of whom La Bruyere speaks had not." "I prefer the simple, naked animal to the odious half-animal," I murmured. "You are thinking of the first semblance now," he replied, "the semblance dear to the poet, that we saw before; let us not confuse it with the one we are now considering. These thoughts and feelings are petty, if you will, and vile; but what is petty and vile is still better than that which is not at all. Of these thoughts and feelings they avail themselves only to hurt each other, and to persist in their present mediocrity; but thus does it often happen in nature. The gifts she accords are employed for evil at first, for the rendering worse what she had apparently sought to improve; but, from this evil, a certain good will always result in the end. Besides, I am by no means anxious to prove that there has been progress, which may be a very small thing or a very great thing, according to the place whence we regard it. It is a vast achievement, the surest ideal, perhaps, to render the condition of men a little less servile, a little less painful; but let the mind detach itself for an instant from material results, and the difference between the man who marches in the van of progress and the other who is blindly dragged at its tail ceases to be very considerable. Among these young rustics, whose mind is haunted only by formless ideas, there are many who have in themselves the possibility of attaining, in a short space of time, the degree of consciousness that we both enjoy. One is often struck by the narrowness of the dividing line between what we regard as the unconsciousness of these people and the consciousness that to us is the highest of all."

"The race, you might say, isn't as strong or healthy. That could be true; alcohol and other problems are hurdles humanity has to overcome; challenges, perhaps, through which some of our organs, like the nerves, might benefit. We often see that life gains from the hardships it conquers. Plus, a small discovery we might make tomorrow could render these substances harmless. These people have thoughts and feelings that those La Bruyere talked about didn't have." "I prefer the simple, raw human to the disgusting half-human," I murmured. "You're thinking of the initial appearance, the one cherished by poets, that we saw earlier; let’s not mix it up with what we’re discussing now. These thoughts and feelings may be trivial, if you want to call them that, and despicable; but what is trivial and despicable is still better than nothing at all. They use these thoughts and feelings only to hurt each other and to stay stuck in their current mediocrity, but that often happens in nature. The gifts she gives are initially used for bad—worsening what she seemed to want to improve; but from that bad, some good will always emerge in the end. Besides, I'm not at all eager to prove there's been progress, which might be a small thing or a huge thing depending on where you look at it from. It’s a significant achievement, perhaps the most reliable ideal, to make people's lives a bit less servile, a bit less painful; but if we take a moment to look past material outcomes, the difference between the person leading the way in progress and the one being dragged along blindly isn't very significant. Among these young villagers, whose minds are filled only with vague ideas, many have within them the potential to quickly reach the level of awareness that we both have. One often notices how thin the line is between what we see as their unconsciousness and the consciousness we consider the highest."

"Besides, of what is this consciousness composed, whereof we are so proud? Of far more shadow than light, of far more acquired ignorance than knowledge; of far more things whose comprehension, we are well aware, must ever elude us, than of things that we actually know. And yet in this consciousness lies all our dignity, our most veritable greatness; it is probably the most surprising phenomenon this world contains. It is this which permits us to raise our head before the unknown principle, and say to it: 'What you are I know not; but there is something within me that already enfolds you. You will destroy me, perhaps, but if your object be not to construct from my ruins an organism better than mine, you will prove yourself inferior to what I am; and the silence that will follow the death of the race to which I belong will declare to you that you have been judged. And if you are not capable even of caring whether you be justly judged or not, of what value can your secret be? It must be stupid or hideous. Chance has enabled you to produce a creature that you yourself lacked the quality to produce. It is fortunate for him that a contrary chance should have permitted you to suppress him before he had fathomed the depths of your unconsciousness; more fortunate still that he does not survive the infinite series of your awful experiments. He had nothing to do in a world where his intellect corresponded to no eternal intellect, where his desire for the better could attain no actual good.'

"Besides, what is this consciousness that we take so much pride in? It contains far more shadow than light, far more ignorance than knowledge; it’s filled with far more things we know we can never understand than with things we actually know. And yet in this consciousness lies all our dignity, our true greatness; it is probably the most astonishing phenomenon this world has. It allows us to stand tall before the unknown and say: 'I don't know what you are; but there’s something inside me that already embraces you. You might destroy me, but if your goal isn't to create something better from my ruins, you will show yourself to be lesser than what I am; and the silence that follows the death of my kind will tell you that you have been judged. And if you don't even care whether that judgment is fair or not, what value can your secret hold? It must be foolish or ugly. Chance allowed you to create a being you yourself couldn’t produce. It’s lucky for him that another chance allowed you to wipe him out before he could grasp the depths of your ignorance; even luckier that he doesn’t survive the endless cycle of your terrible experiments. He had no place in a world where his intellect didn’t match any eternal intellect, where his longing for something better could reach no real good.'”

"Once more, for the spectacle to absorb us, there is no need of progress. The enigma suffices; and that enigma is as great, and shines as mysteriously, in the peasants as in ourselves. As we trace life back to its all-powerful principle, it confronts us on every side. To this principle each succeeding century has given a new name. Some of these names were clear and consoling. It was found, however, that consolation and clearness were alike illusory. But whether we call it God, Providence, Nature, chance, life, fatality, spirit, or matter, the mystery remains unaltered; and from the experience of thousands of years we have learned nothing more than to give it a vaster name, one nearer to ourselves, more congruous with our expectation, with the unforeseen.

"Once again, for the spectacle to captivate us, there's no need for progress. The mystery is enough; and that mystery is as profound and shines as enigmatically in the peasants as it does in us. As we trace life back to its fundamental principle, it surrounds us from every direction. Each century has given this principle a new name. Some of these names were clear and comforting. However, it turned out that both comfort and clarity were merely illusions. But whether we call it God, Providence, Nature, chance, life, fate, spirit, or matter, the mystery remains unchanged; and from the experiences of thousands of years, we've learned nothing more than to give it a broader name, one that is closer to ourselves, more aligned with our expectations, and the unexpected."

"That is the name it bears to-day, wherefore it has never seemed greater. Here we have one of the numberless aspects of the third semblance, which also is truth."

"That's the name it has today, which is why it has never seemed more significant. Here we have one of the countless aspects of the third appearance, which is also truth."





VII — THE MASSACRE OF THE MALES

{94}

IF skies remain clear, the air warm, and pollen and nectar abound in the flowers, the workers, through a kind of forgetful indulgence, or over-scrupulous prudence perhaps, will for a short time longer endure the importunate, disastrous presence of the males. These comport themselves in the hive as did Penelope's suitors in the house of Ulysses. Indelicate and wasteful, sleek and corpulent, fully content with their idle existence as honorary lovers, they feast and carouse, throng the alleys, obstruct the passages, and hinder the work; jostling and jostled, fatuously pompous, swelled with foolish, good-natured contempt; harbouring never a suspicion of the deep and calculating scorn wherewith the workers regard them, of the constantly growing hatred to which they give rise, or of the destiny that awaits them. For their pleasant slumbers they select the snuggest corners of the hive; then, rising carelessly, they flock to the open cells where the honey smells sweetest, and soil with their excrements the combs they frequent. The patient workers, their eyes steadily fixed on the future, will silently set things right. From noon till three, when the purple country trembles in blissful lassitude beneath the invincible gaze of a July or August sun, the drones will appear on the threshold. They have a helmet made of enormous black pearls, two lofty, quivering plumes, a doublet of iridescent, yellowish velvet, an heroic tuft, and a fourfold mantle, translucent and rigid. They create a prodigious stir, brush the sentry aside, overturn the cleaners, and collide with the foragers as these return laden with their humble spoil. They have the busy air, the extravagant, contemptuous gait, of indispensable gods who should be simultaneously venturing towards some destiny unknown to the vulgar. One by one they sail off into space, irresistible, glorious, and tranquilly make for the nearest flowers, where they sleep till the afternoon freshness awake them. Then, with the same majestic pomp, and still overflowing with magnificent schemes, they return to the hive, go straight to the cells, plunge their head to the neck in the vats of honey, and fill themselves tight as a drum to repair their exhausted strength; whereupon, with heavy steps, they go forth to meet the good, dreamless and careless slumber that shall fold them in its embrace till the time for the next repast.

IF the skies are clear, the air warm, and the flowers rich with pollen and nectar, the worker bees, perhaps out of a momentary lapse in judgment or too much caution, will put up with the annoying and harmful presence of the males a little longer. These males behave in the hive like Penelope's suitors did in Ulysses' home. Indecent and wasteful, plump and satisfied with their lazy existence as honorary lovers, they feast and party, crowd the passages, block the corridors, and hinder the work; shoving and being shoved, overly proud, inflated with foolish, easygoing arrogance; completely unaware of the deep disdain the workers have for them, of the growing hatred they inspire, or of the fate that awaits them. For their comfortable naps, they choose the coziest corners of the hive; then, rising carelessly, they flock to the open cells where the honey smells the sweetest, and dirty the combs with their waste. The diligent workers, their eyes focused on the future, will quietly put things right. From noon until three, when the purple countryside lies lazily beneath the powerful gaze of the July or August sun, the drones appear at the entrance. They wear a helmet made of huge black pearls, two tall, quivering plumes, a doublet of shimmering, yellowish velvet, a heroic tuft, and a four-layered, translucent, rigid cloak. They create a huge disturbance, brush the guards aside, knock over the cleaners, and bump into the foragers returning with their humble haul. They exude the busy air, the extravagant, disdainful swagger, of essential gods who are heading toward some unknown destiny. One by one, they glide off into the sky, irresistible, magnificent, and calmly make their way to the nearest flowers, where they nap until the afternoon chill wakes them. Then, with the same grandiosity, and still filled with ambitious plans, they return to the hive, head straight to the cells, dive their heads into the vats of honey, and stuff themselves to recover their strength; afterward, with heavy steps, they go out to meet the good, dreamless, and carefree sleep that will envelop them until it's time for their next meal.

{95}

{95}

But the patience of the bees is not equal to that of men. One morning the long-expected word of command goes through the hive; and the peaceful workers turn into judges and executioners. Whence this word issues, we know not; it would seem to emanate suddenly from the cold, deliberate indignation of the workers; and no sooner has it been uttered than every heart throbs with it, inspired with the genius of the unanimous republic. One part of the people renounce their foraging duties to devote themselves to the work of justice. The great idle drones, asleep in unconscious groups on the melliferous walls, are rudely torn from their slumbers by an army of wrathful virgins. They wake, in pious wonder; they cannot believe their eyes; and their astonishment struggles through their sloth as a moonbeam through marshy water. They stare amazedly round them, convinced that they must be victims of some mistake; and the mother-idea of their life being first to assert itself in their dull brain, they take a step towards the vats of honey to seek comfort there. But ended for them are the days of May honey, the wine-flower of lime trees and fragrant ambrosia of thyme and sage, of marjoram and white clover. Where the path once lay open to the kindly, abundant reservoirs, that so invitingly offered their waxen and sugary mouths, there stands now a burning-bush all alive with poisonous, bristling stings. The atmosphere of the city is changed; in lieu of the friendly perfume of honey, the acrid odour of poison prevails; thousands of tiny drops glisten at the end of the stings, and diffuse rancour and hatred. Before the bewildered parasites are able to realise that the happy laws of the city have crumbled, dragging down in most inconceivable fashion their own plentiful destiny, each one is assailed by three or four envoys of justice; and these vigorously proceed to cut off his wings, saw through the petiole that connects the abdomen with the thorax, amputate the feverish antennae, and seek an opening between the rings of his cuirass through which to pass their sword. No defence is attempted by the enormous, but unarmed, creatures; they try to escape, or oppose their mere bulk to the blows that rain down upon them. Forced on to their back, with their relentless enemies clinging doggedly to them, they will use their powerful claws to shift them from side to side; or, turning on themselves, they will drag the whole group round and round in wild circles, which exhaustion soon brings to an end. And, in a very brief space, their appearance becomes so deplorable that pity, never far from justice in the depths of our heart, quickly returns, and would seek forgiveness, though vainly, of the stern workers who recognise only nature's harsh and profound laws. The wings of the wretched creatures are torn, their antennae bitten, the segments of their legs wrenched off; and their magnificent eyes, mirrors once of the exuberant flowers, flashing back the blue light and the innocent pride of summer, now, softened by suffering, reflect only the anguish and distress of their end. Some succumb to their wounds, and are at once borne away to distant cemeteries by two or three of their executioners. Others, whose injuries are less, succeed in sheltering themselves in some corner, where they lie, all huddled together, surrounded by an inexorable guard, until they perish of want. Many will reach the door, and escape into space dragging their adversaries with them; but, towards evening, impelled by hunger and cold, they return in crowds to the entrance of the hive to beg for shelter. But there they encounter another pitiless guard. The next morning, before setting forth on their journey, the workers will clear the threshold, strewn with the corpses of the useless giants; and all recollection of the idle race disappear till the following spring.

But the patience of bees isn’t the same as that of humans. One morning, the long-awaited command reverberates through the hive; the once-peaceful workers turn into judges and executioners. We don’t know where this command comes from; it seems to arise suddenly from the cold, determined anger of the workers; and no sooner has it been spoken than every heart beats in sync, fueled by the spirit of the united community. A portion of the workers abandon their foraging tasks to focus on executing justice. The huge idle drones, asleep in mindless clusters on the honey-rich walls, are roughly jolted awake by a swarm of furious young bees. They wake up in bewildered amazement; they can’t believe their eyes, and their shock struggles through their laziness like a moonbeam cutting through murky water. They look around in disbelief, sure that they must be victims of some mistake; and the core idea of their existence, which starts to assert itself in their sluggish minds, prompts them to move toward the honey vats for comfort. But the days of sweet May honey are over for them, as is the nectar from lime trees and the fragrant ambrosia of thyme, sage, marjoram, and white clover. Where the path once led to the welcoming, plentiful reservoirs, now stands a burning bush alive with poisonous, sharp stings. The environment of the hive has changed; instead of the friendly scent of honey, the sharp smell of poison fills the air; thousands of tiny drops glisten at the tips of the stings, spreading resentment and hatred. Before the confused drones realize that the happy laws of the hive have collapsed, dragging down their abundant fate in an unimaginable way, each one is attacked by three or four enforcers of justice; they fiercely cut off his wings, saw through the joint connecting his abdomen to his thorax, amputate his frenzied antennae, and look for a way to stab him through the rings of his armor. The huge, defenseless creatures make no effort to resist; they try to escape or counteract the blows with their massive bodies. Forced onto their backs, with relentless attackers clinging to them, they will shift their powerful claws side to side; or by rolling over, they will drag the whole group in wild circles, which exhaustion soon brings to a halt. In a very short time, their appearance becomes so tragic that the pity, always close to justice in the depths of our hearts, quickly re-emerges, seeking forgiveness, though in vain, from the stern workers who recognize only nature's harsh and profound laws. The poor creatures' wings are torn, their antennae bitten off, their legs ripped apart; and their beautiful eyes, once mirrors of vibrant flowers reflecting the blue light and pure pride of summer, now, softened by pain, show only anguish and despair at their end. Some succumb to their injuries and are quickly carried away to distant graves by a couple of their executioners. Others, less severely hurt, manage to find shelter in some corner, huddled together, surrounded by an unyielding guard, until they die from lack of sustenance. Many will make it to the door and escape into the open air, dragging their attackers along; but as evening approaches, driven by hunger and cold, they return in swarms to the hive entrance to beg for shelter. Yet, there they encounter another relentless guard. The next morning, before heading out again, the workers will clear the threshold, littered with the corpses of the useless giants; and all memory of the idle race will vanish until the following spring.

{96}

{96}

In very many colonies of the apiary this massacre will often take place on the same day. The richest, best-governed hive will give the signal; to be followed, some days after, by the little and less prosperous republics. Only the poorest, weakest colonies—those whose mother is very old and almost sterile—will preserve their males till the approach of winter, so as not to abandon the hope of procuring the impregnation of the virgin queen they await, and who may yet be born. Inevitable misery follows; and all the tribe—mother, parasites, workers—collect in a hungry and closely intertwined group, who perish in silence before the first snows arrive, in the obscurity of the hive.

In many bee colonies, this slaughter often happens on the same day. The strongest, best-managed hive will lead the way; a few days later, the smaller and less successful colonies will follow. Only the weakest colonies—those with an old and nearly infertile queen—will keep their males until winter approaches, holding onto the hope of fertilizing the virgin queen they’re expecting to be born. Inevitable suffering follows; and the whole community—mother, drones, workers—gathers in a hungry, tightly packed group, quietly perishing before the first snow falls, hidden in the darkness of the hive.

In the wealthy and populous cities work is resumed after the execution of the drones,—although with diminishing zeal, for flowers are becoming scarce. The great festivals, the great dramas, are over. The autumn honey, however, that shall complete the indispensable provisions, is accumulating within the hospitable walls; and the last reservoirs are sealed with the seal of white, incorruptible wax. Building ceases, births diminish, deaths multiply; the nights lengthen, and days grow shorter. Rain and inclement winds, the mists of the morning, the ambushes laid by a hastening twilight, carry off hundreds of workers who never return; and soon, over the whole little people, that are as eager for sunshine as the grasshoppers of Attica, there hangs the cold menace of winter.

In the rich and crowded cities, work starts up again after the execution of the drones, although with less enthusiasm because flowers are becoming scarce. The big festivals and grand dramas are over. However, the autumn honey, which is essential for supplies, is building up within the welcoming walls; and the last reservoirs are sealed with a layer of white, unspoiled wax. Construction stops, births decrease, and deaths increase; the nights get longer, and the days get shorter. Rain and harsh winds, the morning fog, and the traps set by the approaching twilight take away hundreds of workers who never come back; and soon, over the whole small population, eager for sunshine like the grasshoppers of Attica, looms the cold threat of winter.

Man has already taken his share of the harvest. Every good hive has presented him with eighty or a hundred pounds of honey; the most remarkable will sometimes even give two hundred, which represent an enormous expanse of liquefied light, immense fields of flowers that have been visited daily one or two thousand times. He throws a last glance over the colonies, which are becoming torpid. From the richest he takes their superfluous wealth to distribute it among those whom misfortune, unmerited always in this laborious world, may have rendered necessitous. He covers the dwellings, half closes the doors, removes the useless frames, and leaves the bees to their long winter sleep. They gather in the centre of the hive, contract themselves, and cling to the combs that contain the faithful urns; whence there shall issue, during days of frost, the transmuted substance of summer. The queen is in the midst of them, surrounded by her guard. The first row of the workers attach themselves to the sealed cells; a second row cover the first, a third the second, and so in succession to the last row of all, which form the envelope. When the bees of this envelope feel the cold stealing over them, they re-enter the mass, and others take their place. The suspended cluster is like a sombre sphere that the walls of the comb divide; it rises imperceptibly and falls, it advances or retires, in proportion as the cells grow empty to which it clings. For, contrary to what is generally believed, the winter life of the bee is not arrested, although it be slackened. By the concerted beating of their wings—little sisters that have survived the flames of the sun—which go quickly or slowly in accordance as the temperature without may vary, they maintain in their sphere an unvarying warmth, equal to that of a day in spring. This secret spring comes from the beautiful honey, itself but a ray of heat transformed, that returns now to its first condition. It circulates in the hive like generous blood. The bees at the full cells present it to their neighbours, who pass it on in their turn. Thus it goes from hand to hand and from mouth to mouth, till it attain the extremity of the group in whose thousands of hearts one destiny, one thought, is scattered and united. It stands in lieu of the sun and the flowers, till its elder brother, the veritable sun of the real, great spring, peering through the half-open door, glides in his first softened glances, wherein anemones and violets are coming to life again; and gently awakens the workers, showing them that the sky once more is blue in the world, and that the uninterrupted circle that joins death to life has turned and begun afresh.

Man has already collected his share of the harvest. Every good hive has given him eighty to a hundred pounds of honey; the most impressive ones can even produce two hundred, which represents a huge amount of liquid sunlight, vast fields of flowers that have been visited daily one or two thousand times. He takes one last look at the colonies, which are starting to slow down. From the richest hives, he collects their extra abundance to share with those who misfortune—always undeserved in this hardworking world—may have left in need. He covers the hives, partially closes the doors, removes the unnecessary frames, and allows the bees to settle into their long winter rest. They gather in the center of the hive, huddle together, and cling to the combs that hold their precious stores; from there, during the cold days, they will release the transformed essence of summer. The queen is among them, surrounded by her guards. The first line of workers attaches themselves to the sealed cells; a second line covers the first, a third covers the second, and so on, making up the outer layer. When the bees on this outer layer sense the cold creeping in, they move back to the core, and others take their place. The suspended cluster resembles a dark sphere, divided by the walls of the comb; it subtly rises and falls, advances or retreats, depending on how the cells they cling to become empty. Contrary to popular belief, the bees' winter life is not fully stopped, even though it slows down. By the coordinated beating of their wings—little sisters that have survived the sun's heat—which varies in speed based on the outside temperature, they maintain a consistent warmth within their sphere, equal to a spring day. This hidden spring comes from the beautiful honey, just a ray of heat transformed, which returns to its original state. It flows through the hive like rich blood. The bees at the full cells share it with their neighbors, who pass it along in turn. Thus, it travels from hand to hand and from mouth to mouth until it reaches the edge of the group, where one fate, one thought, is spread and united in thousands of hearts. It stands in for the sun and the flowers until its elder sibling, the real sun of the true, great spring, peeks through the half-open door, casting his first gentle rays, bringing new life to anemones and violets; and softly wakes the workers, showing them that the sky is blue again, and that the continuous cycle connecting death to life has turned and begun anew.





VIII — THE PROGRESS OF THE RACE

{97}

BEFORE closing this book—as we have closed the hive on the torpid silence of winter—I am anxious to meet the objection invariably urged by those to whom we reveal the astounding industry and policy of the bees. Yes, they will say, that is all very wonderful; but then, it has never been otherwise. The bees have for thousands of years dwelt under remarkable laws, but during those thousands of years the laws have not varied. For thousands of years they have constructed their marvellous combs, whereto we can add nothing, wherefrom we can take nothing,—combs that unite in equal perfection the science of the chemist, the geometrician, the architect, and the engineer; but on the sarcophagi, on Egyptian stones and papyri, we find drawings of combs that are identical in every particular. Name a single fact that will show the least progress, a single instance of their having contrived some new feature or modified their habitual routine, and we will cheerfully yield, and admit that they not only possess an admirable instinct, but have also an intellect worthy to approach that of man, worthy to share in one knows not what higher destiny than awaits unconscious and submissive matter.

BEFORE closing this book—as we’ve closed the hive on the stillness of winter—I want to address the common objection raised by those we share the incredible hard work and organization of bees with. Yes, they might say, that’s all very impressive; but it’s always been that way. Bees have lived under remarkable laws for thousands of years, but those laws haven’t changed at all. For thousands of years, they have built their amazing combs, which we can’t improve upon and can’t take anything from—combs that perfectly combine the knowledge of chemists, geometricians, architects, and engineers. Yet, on sarcophagi, Egyptian stones, and papyri, we find drawings of combs that are exactly the same in every detail. Name a single fact that shows even a hint of progress, a single example of them having created something new or altered their usual behavior, and we will gladly concede and acknowledge that they not only have an impressive instinct but also an intelligence that could rival that of humans, worthy of sharing in some unknown higher destiny beyond what awaits lifeless and passive matter.

This language is not even confined to the profane; it is made use of by entomologists of the rank of Kirby and Spence, in order to deny the bees the possession of intellect other than may vaguely stir within the narrow prison of an extraordinary but unchanging instinct. "Show us," they say, "a single case where the pressure of events has inspired them with the idea, for instance, of substituting clay or mortar for wax or propolis; show us this, and we will admit their capacity for reasoning."

This language isn't just used in a negative sense; even respected entomologists like Kirby and Spence use it to argue that bees don't possess any intelligence beyond the basic yet unyielding instincts they have. "Prove to us," they say, "that there's even one instance where external circumstances have led them to think of using clay or mortar instead of wax or propolis; show us that, and we'll acknowledge their ability to reason."

This argument, that Romanes refers to as the "question-begging argument," and that might also be termed the "insatiable argument," is exceedingly dangerous, and, if applied to man, would take us very far. Examine it closely, and you find that it emanates from the "mere common-sense," which is often so harmful; the "common-sense" that replied to Galileo: "The earth does not turn, for I can see the sun move in the sky, rise in the morning and sink in the evening; and nothing can prevail over the testimony of my eyes." Common-sense makes an admirable, and necessary, background for the mind; but unless it be watched by a lofty disquiet ever ready to remind it, when occasion demand, of the infinity of its ignorance, it dwindles into the mere routine of the baser side of our intellect. But the bees have themselves answered the objection Messrs. Kirby and Spence advanced. Scarcely had it been formulated when another naturalist, Andrew Knight, having covered the bark of some diseased trees with a kind of cement made of turpentine and wax, discovered that his bees were entirely renouncing the collection of propolis, and exclusively using this unknown matter, which they had quickly tested and adopted, and found in abundant quantities, ready prepared, in the vicinity of their dwelling.

This argument, referred to by Romanes as the "question-begging argument," and which could also be called the "insatiable argument," is extremely dangerous and, if applied to humans, could lead us far astray. If you look closely, you'll see it comes from "mere common sense," which is often quite harmful; the "common sense" that told Galileo: "The earth doesn’t move because I can see the sun moving in the sky, rising in the morning and setting in the evening; nothing can contradict what my eyes tell me." Common sense provides a great and necessary foundation for our thinking, but if it's not kept in check by a higher awareness that reminds it of its profound ignorance whenever needed, it can degrade into the simple routines of our less refined intellect. However, the bees have responded to the objection raised by Messrs. Kirby and Spence. Hardly had this objection been made when another naturalist, Andrew Knight, covered the bark of some sick trees with a type of cement made from turpentine and wax, discovering that his bees entirely stopped collecting propolis and instead only used this unfamiliar substance, which they quickly tested, adopted, and found in plentiful supply, readily available near their home.

And indeed, one-half of the science and practice of apiculture consists in giving free rein to the spirit of initiative possessed by the bees, and in providing their enterprising intellect with opportunities for veritable discoveries and veritable inventions. Thus, for instance, to aid in the rearing of the larvae and nymphs, the bee-keeper will scatter a certain quantity of flour close to the hive when the pollen is scarce of which these consume an enormous quantity. In a state of nature, in the heart of their native forests in the Asiatic valleys, where they existed probably long before the tertiary epoch, the bees can evidently never have met with a substance of this kind. And yet, if care be taken to "bait" some of them with it, by placing them on the flour, they will touch it and test it, they will perceive that its properties more or less resemble those possessed by the dust of the anthers; they will spread the news among their sisters, and we shall soon find every forager hastening to this unexpected, incomprehensible food, which, in their hereditary memory, must be inseparable from the calyx of flowers where their flight, for so many centuries past, has been sumptuously and voluptuously welcomed.

And indeed, half of the science and practice of beekeeping involves letting the bees' natural initiative thrive and giving their clever minds chances for real discoveries and genuine inventions. For example, to help raise the larvae and nymphs, the beekeeper will spread a certain amount of flour near the hive when pollen is scarce, which they consume in large quantities. In the wild, deep in their native forests in the Asian valleys, where they likely existed long before the tertiary period, bees certainly never encountered a substance like this. Yet, if we take the time to "bait" some of them by placing it on the flour, they will touch it and test it, realizing that its properties somewhat resemble those of pollen. They will share this information with their fellow bees, and soon we will see every forager rushing to this unexpected and confusing food, which, in their inherited memory, must be closely tied to the flowers where they have enjoyed visiting for so many centuries.

{98}

{98}

It is a little more than a hundred years ago that Huber's researches gave the first serious impetus to our study of the bees, and revealed the elementary important truths that allowed us to observe them with fruitful result. Barely fifty years have passed since the foundation of rational, practical apiculture was rendered possible by means of the movable combs and frames devised by Dzierzon and Langstroth, and the hive ceased to be the inviolable abode wherein all came to pass in a mystery from which death alone stripped the veil. And lastly, less than fifty years have elapsed since the improvements of the microscope, of the entomologist's laboratory, revealed the precise secret of the principal organs of the workers, of the mother, and the males. Need we wonder if our knowledge be as scanty as our experience? The bees have existed many thousands of years; we have watched them for ten or twelve lustres. And if it could even be proved that no change has occurred in the hive since we first opened it, should we have the right to conclude that nothing had changed before our first questioning glance? Do we not know that in the evolution of species a century is but as a drop of rain that is caught in the whirl of the river, and that millenaries glide as swiftly over the life of universal matter as single years over the history of a people?

It’s been just over a hundred years since Huber's research gave a significant boost to the study of bees and uncovered key truths that allowed us to observe them with positive outcomes. It’s been only fifty years since the establishment of practical beekeeping became possible through the movable frames and combs created by Dzierzon and Langstroth, transforming the hive from a mysterious place where everything happened unseen until death lifted the veil. Lastly, it’s been less than fifty years since advancements in microscopy and entomology revealed the details of the main organs of worker bees, queens, and drones. Is it any surprise that our knowledge is as limited as our experience? Bees have been around for thousands of years; we've only been studying them for ten or twelve decades. And if we could even prove that there have been no changes in the hive since we first opened it, would we have the right to assume that nothing changed before we started observing? We know that in the evolution of species, a century is just a raindrop caught in the flow of a river, and that millennia pass as quickly over the life of the universe as single years do over the history of a nation.

{99}

{99}

But there is no warrant for the statement that the habits of the bees are unchanged. If we examine them with an unbiassed eye, and without emerging from the small area lit by our actual experience, we shall, on the contrary, discover marked variations. And who shall tell how many escape us? Were an observer of a hundred and fifty times our height and about seven hundred and fifty thousand times our importance (these being the relations of stature and weight in which we stand to the humble honey-fly), one who knew not our language, and was endowed with senses totally different from our own; were such an one to have been studying us, he would recognise certain curious material transformations in the course of the last two thirds of the century, but would be totally unable to form any conception of our moral, social, political, economic or religious evolution.

But there's no basis for the claim that the habits of bees haven't changed. If we look at them with an unbiased perspective, without stepping outside the limited view shaped by our own experiences, we will actually find significant differences. And who knows how many changes go unnoticed by us? If there were an observer towering one hundred and fifty times our height and weighing about seven hundred and fifty thousand times more than us (which is how we relate in size and weight to the humble honeybee), someone who didn’t understand our language and had senses completely different from ours; if such a being were studying us, they would notice some strange material transformations that have taken place over the last two-thirds of a century, but they would have no way of grasping our moral, social, political, economic, or religious development.

The most likely of all the scientific hypotheses will presently permit us to connect our domestic bee with the great tribe of the "Apiens," which embraces all wild bees, and where its ancestors are probably to be found. We shall then perceive physiological, social, economic, industrial, and architectural transformations more extraordinary than those of our human evolution. But for the moment we will limit ourselves to our domestic bee properly so called. Of these sixteen fairly distinct species are known; but, essentially, whether we consider the Apis Dorsata, the largest known to us, or the Apis Florea, which is the smallest, the insect is always exactly the same, except for the slight modifications induced by the climate and by the conditions whereto it has had to conform.*

The most likely scientific hypotheses will now allow us to connect our domestic bees with the larger group of "Apiens," which includes all wild bees and likely contains their ancestors. We'll then see physiological, social, economic, industrial, and architectural changes that are even more impressive than those in human evolution. For now, though, we'll focus on our domestic bee specifically. There are sixteen fairly distinct known species; however, whether we look at the Apis Dorsata, the largest one we know, or the Apis Florea, the smallest, the insect remains fundamentally the same, except for slight changes caused by climate and the conditions it has adapted to.*

    *The scientific classification of the domestic bee is as follows:

    Class....... Insecta

    Order....... Hymenoptera

    Family...... Apidae

    Genus....... Apis

    Species..... Mellifica
*The scientific classification of the domestic bee is as follows:

Class....... Insecta

Order....... Hymenoptera

Family...... Apidae

Genus....... Apis

Species..... Mellifica

The term "Mellifica" is that of the Linnaean classification. It is not of the happiest, for all the Apidae, with the exception of certain parasites perhaps, are producers of honey. Scopoli uses the term "Cerifera "; Reaumur "Domestica "; Geoffroy "Gregaria." The "Apis Ligustica," the Italian bee, is another variety of the "Mellifica."

The term "Mellifica" comes from the Linnaean classification. It's not the best choice since all the Apidae, except for a few parasites, produce honey. Scopoli uses the term "Cerifera"; Reaumur calls it "Domestica"; Geoffroy refers to it as "Gregaria." The "Apis Ligustica," the Italian bee, is another type of "Mellifica."

The difference between these various species is scarcely greater than that between an Englishman and a Russian, a Japanese and a European. In these preliminary remarks, therefore, we will confine ourselves to what actually lies within the range of our eyes, refusing the aid of hypothesis, be this never so probable or so imperious. We shall mention no facts that are not susceptible of immediate proof; and of such facts we will only rapidly refer to some of the more significant.

The difference between these various species is hardly greater than that between an Englishman and a Russian, or a Japanese and a European. In these initial comments, we will stick to what we can actually see, ignoring any theories, no matter how likely or urgent they may seem. We won’t mention any facts that can’t be immediately verified; and of those facts, we will only briefly highlight some of the more significant ones.

{100}

{100}

Let us consider first of all the most important and most radical improvement, one that in the case of man would have called for prodigious labour: the external protection of the community.

Let’s first think about the most important and radical improvement, one that, for humanity, would have required tremendous effort: the community’s external protection.

The bees do not, like ourselves, dwell in towns free to the sky, and exposed to the caprice of rain and storm, but in cities entirely covered with a protecting envelope. In a state of nature, however, in an ideal climate, this is not the case. If they listened only to their essential instinct, they would construct their combs in the open air. In the Indies, the Apis Dorsata will not eagerly seek hollow trees, or a hole in the rocks. The swarm will hang from the crook of a branch; and the comb will be lengthened, the queen lay her eggs, provisions be stored, with no shelter other than that which the workers' own bodies provide. Our Northern bees have at times been known to revert to this instinct, under the deceptive influence of a too gentle sky; and swarms have been found living in the heart of a bush. But even in the Indies, the result of this habit, which would seem innate, is by no means favourable. So considerable a number of the workers are compelled to remain on one spot, occupied solely with the maintenance of the heat required by those who are moulding the wax and rearing the brood, that the Apis Dorsata, hanging thus from the branches, will construct but a single comb; whereas if she have the least shelter she will erect four or five, or more, and will proportionately increase the prosperity and the population of the colony. And indeed we find that all species of bees existing in cold and temperate regions have abandoned this primitive method. The intelligent initiative of the insect has evidently received the sanction of natural selection, which has allowed only the most numerous and best protected tribes to survive our winters. What had been merely an idea, therefore, and opposed to instinct, has thus by slow degrees become an instinctive habit. But it is none the less true that in forsaking the vast light of nature that was so dear to them and seeking shelter in the obscure hollow of a tree or a cavern, the bees have followed what at first was an audacious idea, based on observation, probably, on experience and reasoning. And this idea might be almost declared to have been as important to the destinies of the domestic bee as was the invention of fire to the destinies of man.

The bees don’t, like us, live in open towns beneath the sky, exposed to rain and storms, but in cities completely covered by protective structures. In nature, though, in an ideal climate, this isn't the case. If they followed only their basic instincts, they would build their hives outdoors. In the Indies, the Apis Dorsata doesn’t actively seek hollow trees or crevices in rocks. The swarm hangs from the bend of a branch; the comb grows longer, the queen lays her eggs, and food is stored with only the shelter provided by the bodies of the worker bees. Our Northern bees have sometimes reverted to this instinct when influenced by an unusually calm sky; swarms have been found living deep within a bush. But even in the Indies, this behavior, which seems natural, doesn’t yield favorable results. A significant number of workers must stay in one place, solely focused on maintaining the heat needed for those shaping the wax and raising the young, so the Apis Dorsata, hanging from branches, will only build one comb; whereas with the slightest shelter, it can create four or five or more, which increases the colony's prosperity and population proportionately. In fact, we see that all bee species in cold and temperate areas have abandoned this primitive approach. The clever instincts of these insects have clearly been shaped by natural selection, allowing only the most numerous and well-protected groups to survive the winters. What started as merely a concept, initially against instinct, has gradually evolved into an instinctive behavior. However, it’s still true that by leaving the vast natural light they cherished and seeking refuge in the dark hollow of a tree or cave, bees have pursued what was first a bold idea, likely based on observation, experience, and reasoning. This idea could almost be seen as pivotal to the future of the domestic bee, just as the invention of fire was to humanity.

{101}

{101}

This great progress, not the less actual for being hereditary and ancient, was followed by an infinite variety of details which prove that the industry, and even the policy, of the hive have not crystallised into infrangible formulae. We have already mentioned the intelligent substitution of flour for pollen, and of an artificial cement for propolis. We have seen with what skill the bees are able to adapt to their needs the occasionally disconcerting dwellings into which they are introduced, and the surprising adroitness wherewith they turn combs of foundation-wax to good account. They display extraordinary ingenuity in their manner of handling these marvellous combs, which are so strangely useful, and yet incomplete. In point of fact, they meet man half-way. Let us imagine that we had for centuries past been erecting cities, not with stones, bricks, and lime, but with some pliable substance painfully secreted by special organs of our body. One day an all-powerful being places us in the midst of a fabulous city. We recognise that it is made of a substance similar to the one that we secrete, but, as regards the rest, it is a dream, whereof what is logical is so distorted, so reduced, and as it were concentrated, as to be more disconcerting almost than had it been incoherent. Our habitual plan is there; in fact, we find everything that we had expected; but all has been put together by some antecedent force that would seem to have crushed it, arrested it in the mould, and to have hindered its completion. The houses whose height must attain some four or five yards are the merest protuberances, that our two hands can cover. Thousands of walls are indicated by signs that hint at once of their plan and material. Elsewhere there are marked deviations, which must be corrected; gaps to be filled and harmoniously joined to the rest, vast surfaces that are unstable and will need support. The enterprise is hopeful, but full of hardship and danger. It would seem to have been conceived by some sovereign intelligence, that was able to divine most of our desires, but has executed them clumsily, being hampered by its very vastness. We must disentangle, therefore, what now is obscure, we must develop the least intentions of the supernatural donor; we must build in a few days what would ordinarily take us years; we must renounce organic habits, and fundamentally alter our methods of labour. It is certain that all the attention man could devote would not be excessive for the solution of the problems that would arise, or for the turning to fullest account the help thus offered by a magnificent providence. Yet that is, more or less, what the bees are doing in our modern hives.*

This significant progress, even though it's been passed down and is quite old, led to countless details proving that the bees' industry and even their practices haven’t solidified into unchangeable rules. We've already noted how intelligently they substitute flour for pollen and use artificial cement instead of propolis. We've seen how skilled the bees are at adapting the sometimes confusing environments they find themselves in, and the impressive way they make good use of foundation-wax combs. They show remarkable creativity in how they handle these incredible combs, which are oddly very useful yet unfinished. In fact, they meet humans halfway. Imagine if for centuries we've been building cities, not with stones, bricks, and mortar, but with some flexible material painstakingly produced by special organs of our bodies. One day, a powerful entity places us in the middle of an astonishing city. We recognize that it’s made from a substance similar to what we produce, but everything else is like a dream, where what seems logical is so twisted, shrunk down, and focused that it’s almost more confusing than if it were incoherent. Our usual layout is there; we find everything we expected, but it's all been put together by some prior force that seems to have squished it, trapped it in a mold, and stopped it from being finished. The houses, which should reach about four or five yards high, are just tiny bumps that our hands can cover. Thousands of walls are represented by signs suggesting their design and material. Elsewhere, there are clear mistakes that need fixing; gaps to fill in and blend into the rest; large areas that are unstable and need support. The task is promising but filled with challenges and risks. It seems to have been conceived by some supreme intelligence that understood most of our desires but executed them poorly due to its own vastness. We need to untangle what’s unclear, develop the faint intentions of this supernatural provider; we have to build in a few days what would normally take us years; we must abandon our natural habits and fundamentally change our working methods. It's true that all the attention humans could give wouldn’t be too much for solving the issues that would come up, or for making the most of the help offered by this amazing provision. Yet, that’s more or less what the bees are doing in our modern hives.*

     *As we are now concerned with the construction of the bee,
     we may note, in passing, a strange peculiarity of the Apis
     Florea. Certain walls of its cells for males are cylindrical
     instead of hexagonal. Apparently she has not yet succeeded
     in passing from one form to the other, and indefinitely
     adopting the better.
     *As we focus on how bees are built, we should mention an interesting feature of the Apis Florea. Some walls of its male cells are cylindrical instead of hexagonal. It seems that it has not yet been able to transition from one shape to the other and is still using the less efficient option.

{102}

{102}

I have said that even the policy of the bees is probably subject to change. This point is the obscurest of all, and the most difficult to verify. I shall not dwell on their various methods of treating the queens, or the laws as to swarming that are peculiar to the inhabitants of every hive, and apparently transmitted from generation to generation, etc.; but by the side of these facts which are not sufficiently established are others so precise and unvarying as to prove that the same degree of political civilisation has not been attained by all races of the domestic bee, and that, among some of them, the public spirit still is groping its way, seeking perhaps another solution of the royal problem. The Syrian bee, for instance, habitually rears 120 queens and often more, whereas our Apis Mellifica will rear ten or twelve at most. Cheshire tells of a Syrian hive, in no way abnormal, where 120 dead queen-mothers were found, and 90 living, unmolested queens. This may be the point of departure, or the point of arrival, of a strange social evolution, which it would be interesting to study more thoroughly. We may add that as far as the rearing of queens is concerned, the Cyprian bee approximates to the Syrian. And finally, there is yet another fact which establishes still more clearly that the customs and prudent organisation of the hive are not the results of a primitive impulse, mechanically followed through different ages and climates, but that the spirit which governs the little republic is fully as capable of taking note of new conditions and turning these to the best advantage, as in times long past it was capable of meeting the dangers that hemmed it around. Transport our black bee to California or Australia, and her habits will completely alter. Finding that summer is perpetual and flowers forever abundant, she will after one or two years be content to live from day to day, and gather sufficient honey and pollen for the day's consumption; and, her thoughtful observation of these new features triumphing over hereditary experience, she will cease to make provision for the winter.* In fact it becomes necessary, in order to stimulate her activity, to deprive her systematically of the fruits of her labour.

I’ve mentioned that even the behavior of bees is likely to change over time. This aspect is the most unclear and hardest to confirm. I won’t focus on their different ways of treating queens or the unique swarming rules that differ among hives and seem to be passed down through generations; instead, alongside these not fully established facts, there are others so clear and consistent that they show that not all bee species have reached the same level of social development. Among some, the collective mindset is still figuring things out, possibly searching for a new solution to the queen issue. For instance, the Syrian bee typically raises 120 queens or even more, while our honeybee usually produces ten or twelve at most. Cheshire recounts a story of a typical Syrian hive where 120 dead queen bees were discovered, along with 90 healthy, undisturbed queens. This might represent either the beginning or the culmination of an unusual social evolution that would be fascinating to explore further. It's worth noting that when it comes to raising queens, the Cyprian bee is similar to the Syrian bee. Lastly, there’s another fact that clearly indicates that the customs and wise organization of the hive aren’t just the result of a primitive instinct mindlessly followed across time and different environments. The system that governs this tiny community is equally capable of adapting to new conditions and leveraging them for its benefit, just as it once managed the threats it faced. If we take our black bee to California or Australia, her habits will completely change. Realizing that summer lasts forever and flowers are always plentiful, she will, after a year or two, adapt to living day by day, collecting enough honey and pollen for daily use. Her keen observations of these new circumstances will override her inherited behaviors, leading her to stop preparing for winter. In fact, to encourage her activity, it becomes necessary to regularly take away the results of her efforts.

     *Buchner cites an analogous fact. In the Barbadoes, the bees
     whose hives are in the midst of the refineries, where they
     find sugar in abundance during the whole year, will entirely
     abandon their visits to the flowers.
     *Buchner points out a similar fact. In Barbados, the bees that have their hives near the refineries, where they find plenty of sugar all year round, will completely stop visiting the flowers.

{103}

{103}

So much for what our own eyes can see. It will be admitted that we have mentioned some curious facts, which by no means support the theory that every intelligence is arrested, every future clearly defined, save only the intelligence and future of man.

So much for what we can see with our own eyes. It's clear that we've pointed out some interesting facts that definitely don't back up the idea that every intelligence is stagnant, or that every future is set in stone, except for the intelligence and future of humans.

But if we choose to accept for one moment the hypothesis of evolution, the spectacle widens, and its uncertain, grandiose light soon attains our own destinies. Whoever brings careful attention to bear will scarcely deny, even though it be not evident, the presence in nature of a will that tends to raise a portion of matter to a subtler and perhaps better condition, and to penetrate its substance little by little with a mystery-laden fluid that we at first term life, then instinct, and finally intelligence; a will that, for an end we know not, organises, strengthens, and facilitates the existence of all that is. There can be no certainty, and yet many instances invite us to believe that, were an actual estimate possible, the quantity of matter that has raised itself from its beginnings would be found to be ever increasing. A fragile remark, I admit, but the only one we can make on the hidden force that leads us; and it stands for much in a world where confidence in life, until certitude to the contrary reach us, must remain the first of all our duties, at times even when life itself conveys no encouraging clearness to us.

But if we take a moment to consider the idea of evolution, the scene expands, and its uncertain, grand light soon influences our own futures. Anyone who pays close attention will find it hard to deny, even if it’s not obvious, that there is a will in nature that seems to elevate some matter into a finer and maybe better state, gradually filling its essence with a mysterious force that we first call life, then instinct, and finally intelligence; a will that, for a reason we don’t understand, organizes, strengthens, and supports the existence of everything. There’s no certainty, but many examples lead us to believe that, if we could measure it, the amount of matter that has evolved from its origins would show a constant increase. It’s a delicate statement, I know, but it’s the only one we can make about the hidden force guiding us; and it represents a lot in a world where faith in life, until proven otherwise, must remain our top priority, even when life itself doesn't provide us with clear encouragement.

I know all that may be urged against the theory of evolution. In its favour are numerous proofs and most powerful arguments, which yet do not carry irresistible conviction. We must beware of abandoning ourselves unreservedly to the prevailing truths of our time. A hundred years hence, many chapters of a book instinct to-day with this truth, will appear as ancient as the philosophical writings of the eighteenth century seem to us now, full as they are of a too perfect and non-existing man, or as so many works of the seventeenth century, whose value is lessened by their conception of a harsh and narrow god.

I understand that there are many arguments against the theory of evolution. However, there are also numerous proofs and strong arguments in its favor that still don't convince everyone completely. We need to be cautious about fully accepting the dominant ideas of our time. A hundred years from now, many sections of a book that seem true today will appear as outdated as the philosophical texts from the eighteenth century do to us now, which are filled with an unrealistic and idealized view of humanity, or like the works from the seventeenth century, whose worth is diminished by their harsh and limited view of God.

Nevertheless, when it is impossible to know what the truth of a thing may be, it is well to accept the hypothesis that appeals the most urgently to the reason of men at the period when we happen to have come into the world. The chances are that it will be false; but so long as we believe it to be true it will serve a useful purpose by restoring our courage and stimulating research in a new direction. It might at the first glance seem wiser, perhaps, instead of advancing these ingenious suppositions, simply to say the profound truth, which is that we do not know. But this truth could only be helpful were it written that we never shall know. In the meanwhile it would induce a state of stagnation within us more pernicious than the most vexatious illusions. We are so constituted that nothing takes us further or leads us higher than the leaps made by our errors. In point of fact we owe the little we have learned to hypotheses that were always hazardous and often absurd, and, as a general rule, less discreet than they are to-day. They were unwise, perhaps, but they kept alive the ardour for research. To the traveller, shivering with cold, who reaches the human Hostelry, it matters little whether he by whose side he seats himself, he who has guarded the hearth, be blind or very old. So long as the fire still burn that he has been watching, he has done as much as the best could have done. Well for us if we can transmit this ardour, not as we received it, but added to by ourselves; and nothing will add to it more than this hypothesis of evolution, which goads us to question with an ever severer method and ever increasing zeal all that exists on the earth's surface and in its entrails, in the depths of the sea and expanse of the sky. Reject it, and what can we set up against it, what can we put in its place? There is but the grand confession of scientific ignorance, aware of its knowing nothing—but this is habitually sluggish, and calculated to discourage the curiosity more needful to man than wisdom—or the hypothesis of the fixity of the species and of divine creation, which is less demonstrable than the other, banishes for all time the living elements of the problem, and explains nothing.

However, when it's impossible to know the truth about something, it's best to accept the hypothesis that speaks most urgently to people’s reason at the time we happen to be living. Chances are, it will be wrong; but as long as we believe it’s true, it will help to restore our courage and inspire research in new directions. At first glance, it might seem wiser to simply state the deep truth that we don’t know. But this truth would only be helpful if it were clear that we will never know. In the meantime, it would lead to a kind of stagnation within us that is more harmful than the most annoying illusions. We’re built in such a way that nothing drives us further or elevates us more than the leaps made by our mistakes. In fact, what little we’ve learned, we owe to hypotheses that were always risky and often ridiculous, and generally less cautious than they are today. They might have been unwise, but they kept the longing for research alive. For a traveler, shivering with cold, reaching the human inn, it doesn’t matter much whether the person next to him, the one tending the fire, is blind or very old. As long as the fire keeps burning, he has done just as much as the best could have done. We should be grateful if we can pass on this passion not just as we received it but enhanced by our own contributions; and nothing can enhance it more than this hypothesis of evolution, which drives us to question with an ever sharper method and growing passion everything that exists on the earth’s surface, in its depths, in the sea, and in the sky. If we reject it, what can we put in its place? There’s only the grand acknowledgment of scientific ignorance, knowing nothing—this is typically slow-moving and tends to dampen the curiosity that is more essential for humans than wisdom—or the hypothesis of fixed species and divine creation, which is less demonstrable than the former, removes the living elements of the problem, and explains nothing.

{104}

{104}

Of wild bees approximately 4500 varieties are known. It need scarcely be said that we shall not go through the list. Some day, perhaps, a profound study, and searching experiments and observations of a kind hitherto unknown, that would demand more than one lifetime, will throw a decisive light upon the history of the bee's evolution. All that we can do now is to enter this veiled region of supposition, and, discarding all positive statement, attempt to follow a tribe of hymenoptera in their progress towards a more intelligent existence, towards a little more security and comfort, lightly indicating the salient features of this ascension that is spread over many thousands of years. The tribe in question is already known to us; it is that of the "Apiens," whose essential characteristics are so distinct and well-marked that one is inclined to credit all its members with one common ancestor.*

Of wild bees, around 4,500 species are known. It's hardly necessary to go through the entire list. Someday, perhaps, a deep study and thorough experiments and observations of a kind that we've never seen before, which would take more than one lifetime, will provide a clear understanding of the bee's evolution. For now, all we can do is step into this uncertain area of speculation and, without making definitive claims, try to trace a group of hymenoptera as they move toward a more intelligent existence, seeking a bit more security and comfort, lightly highlighting the key aspects of this journey that spans many thousands of years. The group in question is already familiar to us; it is that of the "Apiens," whose essential traits are so distinct and well-defined that it’s tempting to think all its members share a common ancestor.*

     *It is important that the terms we shall successively
     employ, adopting the classification of M. Emile Blanchard,—
     "APIENS, APIDAE and APITAE,—should not be confounded. The
     tribe of the Apiens comprises all families of bees. The
     Apidae constitute the first of these families, and are
     subdivided into three groups: the Meliponae, the Apitae, and
     the Bombi (humble-bees). And, finally, the Apitae include
     all the different varieties of our domestic bees.
*It's important that the terms we will use, following the classification of M. Emile Blanchard—"APIENS, APIDAE, and APITAE"—are not confused. The tribe of Apiens includes all families of bees. The Apidae is the first of these families and is divided into three groups: Meliponae, Apitae, and Bombi (humble-bees). Finally, the Apitae includes all the different types of our domestic bees.

The disciples of Darwin, Hermann Muller among others, consider a little wild bee, the Prosopis, which is to be found all over the universe, as the actual representative of the primitive bee whence all have issued that are known to us to-day.

The followers of Darwin, including Hermann Muller, view a small wild bee, the Prosopis, which can be found all over the world, as the true representative of the ancient bee from which all the bees we know today have evolved.

The unfortunate Prosopis stands more or less in the same relation to the inhabitants of our hives as the cave-dwellers to the fortunate who live in our great cities. You will probably more than once have seen her fluttering about the bushes, in a deserted corner of your garden, without realising that you were carelessly watching the venerable ancestor to whom we probably owe most of our flowers and fruits (for it is actually estimated that more than a hundred thousand varieties of plants would disappear if the bees did not visit them) and possibly even our civilisation, for in these mysteries all things intertwine. She is nimble and attractive, the variety most common in France being elegantly marked with white on a black background. But this elegance hides an inconceivable poverty. She leads a life of starvation. She is almost naked, whereas her sisters are dad in a warm and sumptuous fleece. She has not, like the Apidae, baskets to gather the pollen, nor, in their default, the tuft of the Andrenae, nor the ventral brush of the Gastrilegidae. Her tiny claws must laboriously gather the powder from the calices, which powder she needs must swallow in order to take it back to her lair. She has no implements other than her tongue, her mouth and her claws; but her tongue is too short, her legs are feeble, and her mandibles without strength. Unable to produce wax, bore holes through wood, or dig in the earth, she contrives clumsy galleries in the tender pith of dry berries; erects a few awkward cells, stores these with a little food for the offspring she never will see; and then, having accomplished this poor task of hers, that tends she knows not whither and of whose aim we are no less ignorant, she goes off and dies in a corner, as solitarily as she had lived.

The unfortunate Prosopis relates to the residents of our hives much like cave dwellers relate to those fortunate enough to live in our large cities. You’ve likely seen her fluttering around the bushes in a quiet spot in your garden, not realizing you were idly observing the ancient ancestor to whom we probably owe most of our flowers and fruits (it’s estimated that over a hundred thousand plant varieties would vanish if bees didn’t visit them), and possibly even our civilization, as everything is interconnected in these mysteries. She is quick and attractive, with the most common variety in France elegantly marked in white against a black background. But this elegance masks an unimaginable poverty. She lives a life of starvation. She is almost bare, while her sisters are clad in warm and luxurious fur. Unlike the Apidae, she doesn’t have baskets to collect pollen, nor the tuft of the Andrenae, nor the ventral brush of the Gastrilegidae. Her tiny claws must clumsily gather pollen from the flower cups, which she must swallow to take back to her nest. She has no tools other than her tongue, her mouth, and her claws; but her tongue is too short, her legs are weak, and her mandibles lack strength. Unable to produce wax, bore into wood, or dig in the ground, she creates awkward tunnels in the soft center of dry berries; builds a few clumsy cells, fills them with a little food for offspring she will never see; and then, after finishing this meager task that has an unknown purpose, she wanders off and dies in a corner, as alone as she lived.

We shall pass over many intermediary species, wherein we may see the gradual lengthening of the tongue, enabling more nectar to be extracted from the cups of corollas, and the dawning formation and subsequent development of the apparatus for collecting pollen,—hairs, tufts, brushes on the tibia, on the tarsus, and abdomen,—as also claws and mandibles becoming stronger, useful secretions being formed, and the genius that presides over the construction of dwellings seeking and finding extraordinary improvement in every direction. Such a study would need a whole volume. I will merely outline a chapter of it, less than a chapter, a page, which shall show how the hesitating endeavours of the will to live and be happier result in the birth, development, and affirmation of social intelligence.

We will skip over many intermediate species, where we can see the gradual lengthening of the tongue, allowing more nectar to be gathered from the flowers, along with the early formation and later development of the features for collecting pollen—like hairs, tufts, and brushes on the legs and abdomen—as well as stronger claws and mandibles, the creation of useful secretions, and the talent for building homes seeking and achieving remarkable improvements in every way. This topic would require an entire volume. I will only sketch out a part of it, less than a full chapter, just a page, which will illustrate how the hesitant efforts of the will to survive and thrive lead to the birth, growth, and affirmation of social intelligence.

We have seen the unfortunate Prosopis silently bearing her solitary little destiny in the midst of this vast universe charged with terrible forces. A certain number of her sisters, belonging to species already more skilful and better supplied with utensils, such as the well-clad Colletes, or the marvellous cutter of rose-leaves, the Megachile Centuncularis, live in an isolation no less profound; and if by chance some creature attach itself to them, and share their dwelling, it will either be an enemy, or, more often, a parasite.

We have seen the unfortunate Prosopis quietly enduring her lonely fate in the midst of this vast universe filled with powerful forces. Some of her sisters, belonging to species that are already more skilled and better equipped, like the well-dressed Colletes or the amazing rose-leaf cutter, Megachile Centuncularis, live in an equally deep isolation. If by chance a creature attaches itself to them and shares their home, it will either be an enemy or, more often, a parasite.

For the world of bees is peopled with phantoms stranger than our own; and many a species will thus have a kind of mysterious and inactive double, exactly similar to the victim it has selected, save only that its immemorial idleness has caused it to lose one by one its implements of labour, and that it exists solely at the expense of the working type of its race.*

For the world of bees is populated with more unusual creatures than our own; and many species will have an eerie and inactive counterpart, almost identical to the host it chooses, except that its long-standing laziness has caused it to gradually lose its tools of work, and it lives entirely at the cost of the hardworking members of its species.*

     *The humble-bees, for instance, have the Psithyri as
     parasites, while the Stelites live on the Anthidia. "As
     regards the frequent identity of the parasite with its
     victim," M. J. Perez very justly remarks in his book "The
     Bees," "one must necessarily admit that the two genera are
     only different forms of the same type, and are united to
     each other by the closest affinity. And to naturalists who
     believe in the theory of evolution this relationship is not
     purely ideal, but real. The parasitic genus must be regarded
     as merely a branch of the foraging genus, having lost its
     foraging organs because of its adaptation to parasitic
     life."
     *Humble-bees, for example, have Psithyri as parasites, while Stelites feed on Anthidia. "Regarding the frequent similarity between the parasite and its host," M. J. Perez rightly points out in his book "The Bees," "we must acknowledge that the two genera are simply different forms of the same type, and are closely related to each other. For naturalists who support the theory of evolution, this connection isn't just a concept, but a reality. The parasitic genus should be seen as just a branch of the foraging genus, having lost its foraging abilities due to its adaptation to a parasitic lifestyle."

Among the bees, however, which are somewhat too arbitrarily termed the "solitary Apidae," the social instinct already is smouldering, like a flame crushed beneath the overwhelming weight of matter that stifles all primitive life. And here and there, in unexpected directions, as though reconnoitring, with timid and sometimes fantastic outbursts, it will succeed in piercing the mass that oppresses it, the pyre that some day shall feed its triumph.

Among the bees, though, which are somewhat inaccurately called the "solitary Apidae," the social instinct is already simmering, like a flame crushed under the heavy weight of matter that stifles all primitive life. Occasionally, in unexpected ways, as if scouting around, with shy and sometimes bizarre bursts, it manages to break through the mass that weighs it down, the pile that will someday fuel its success.

If in this world all things be matter, this is surely its most immaterial movement. Transition is called for from a precarious, egotistic and incomplete life to a life that shall be fraternal, a little more certain, a little more happy. The spirit must ideally unite that which in the body is actually separate; the individual must sacrifice himself for the race, and substitute for visible things the things that cannot be seen. Need we wonder that the bees do not at the first glance realise what we have not yet disentangled, we who find ourselves at the privileged spot whence instinct radiates from all sides into our consciousness? And it is curious too, almost touching, to see how the new idea gropes its way, at first, in the darkness that enfolds all things that come to life on this earth. It emerges from matter, it is still quite material. It is cold, hunger, fear, transformed into something that as yet has no shape. It crawls vaguely around great dangers, around the long nights, the approach of winter, of an equivocal sleep which almost is death....

If everything in this world is made of matter, then this is definitely its most intangible movement. We need to shift from a precarious, self-centered, and incomplete life to one that is more brotherly, a bit more certain, and a bit happier. The spirit should ideally connect what is physically separate in the body; individuals must sacrifice themselves for the greater good and replace visible things with those that are unseen. Should we be surprised that bees don’t immediately understand what we have yet to unravel, we who are in a special position where instinct radiates from all directions into our awareness? It’s also interesting, even touching, to watch how a new idea feels its way through the darkness that surrounds everything alive on this earth. It comes out of matter, still very material. It is cold, hungry, fearful, transformed into something that doesn’t yet have a form. It crawls vaguely around significant dangers, long nights, the coming of winter, and an ambiguous sleep that almost feels like death...

{106}

{106}

The Xylocopae are powerful bees which worm their nest in dry wood. Their life is solitary always. Towards the end of summer, however, some individuals of a particular species, the Xylocopa Cyanescens, may be found huddled together in a shivering group, on a stalk of asphodel, to spend the winter in common. Among the Xylocopae this tardy fraternity is exceptional, but among the Ceratinae, which are of their nearest kindred, it has become a constant habit. The idea is germinating. It halts immediately; and hitherto has not succeeded, among the Xylocopae, in passing beyond this first obscure line of love.

The Xylocopae are strong bees that make their nests in dry wood. They always live a solitary life. However, towards the end of summer, some individuals of a specific species, the Xylocopa Cyanescens, can be found huddled together in a shivering group on a stalk of asphodel to spend the winter together. This late grouping among the Xylocopae is unusual, but among the Ceratinae, which are their closest relatives, it has become a regular behavior. The idea is starting to take shape. It stops right there and, so far, has not progressed among the Xylocopae beyond this initial, vague expression of affection.

Among other Apiens, this groping idea assumes other forms. The Chalicodomae of the out-houses, which are building-bees, the Dasypodae and Halicti, which dig holes in the earth, unite in large colonies to construct their nests. But it is an illusory crowd composed of solitary units, that possess no mutual understanding, and do not act in common. Each one is profoundly isolated in the midst of the multitude, and builds a dwelling for itself alone, heedless of its neighbour. "They are," M. Perez remarks, "a mere congregation of individuals, brought together by similar tastes and habits, but observing scrupulously the maxim of each one for itself; in fact, a mere mob of workers, resembling the swarm of a hive only as regards their number and zeal. Such assemblies merely result from a great number of individuals inhabiting the same locality."

Among other Apiens, this vague idea takes on different forms. The Chalicodomae found in outbuildings, which are building-bees, along with the Dasypodae and Halicti that dig into the ground, come together in large colonies to build their nests. However, this seems like a crowd made up of solitary individuals, lacking any mutual understanding and not working together. Each one is deeply isolated in the middle of the group, constructing a home solely for itself, indifferent to its neighbors. "They are," M. Perez notes, "just a collection of individuals, gathered by similar preferences and behaviors, but strictly adhering to the rule of each one for themselves; essentially, a mere mob of workers, comparable to the swarm of a hive only in terms of their numbers and enthusiasm. Such gatherings simply arise from a large number of individuals living in the same area."

But when we come to the Panurgi, which are cousins of the Dasypodae, a little ray of light suddenly reveals the birth of a new sentiment in this fortuitous crowd. They collect in the same way as the others, and each one digs its own subterranean chambers; but the entrance is common to all, as also the gallery which leads from the surface of the ground to the different cells. "And thus," M. Perez adds, "as far as the work of the cells is concerned, each bee acts as though she were alone; but all make equal use of the gallery that conducts to the cells, so that the multitude profit by the labours of an individual, and are spared the time and trouble required for the construction of separate galleries. It would be interesting to discover whether this preliminary work be not executed in common, by relays of females, relieving each other in turn."

But when we look at the Panurgi, which are related to the Dasypodae, a little insight suddenly shows the emergence of a new feeling within this random group. They gather just like the others, and each one digs its own underground chambers; however, the entrance is shared by all, as is the tunnel that leads from the ground surface to the various cells. "And so," M. Perez adds, "regarding the construction of the cells, each bee behaves as if she were working alone; but all utilize the common tunnel that leads to the cells, allowing the group to benefit from an individual's efforts and saving time and effort that would have been needed to create separate tunnels. It would be interesting to find out whether this initial work is done collectively, with teams of females taking turns."

However this may be, the fraternal idea has pierced the wall that divided two worlds. It is no longer wild and unrecognisable, wrested from instinct by cold and hunger, or by the fear of death; it is prompted by active life. But it halts once more; and in this instance arrives no further. No matter, it does not lose courage; it will seek other channels. It enters the humble-bee, and, maturing there, becomes embodied in a different atmosphere, and works its first decisive miracles.

However this may be, the idea of brotherhood has broken through the barrier that separated two worlds. It’s no longer wild and unrecognizable, driven by instinct due to cold, hunger, or the fear of death; it’s now inspired by active life. But it stops short again, and in this case doesn’t go any further. No matter, it doesn’t lose hope; it will look for other ways. It enters the humble bee, and as it develops there, it becomes part of a different environment and performs its first significant wonders.

The humble-bees, the great hairy, noisy creatures that all of us know so well, so harmless for all their apparent fierceness, lead a solitary life at first. At the beginning of March the impregnated female who has survived the winter starts to construct her nest, either underground or in a bush, according to the species to which she belongs. She is alone in the world, in the midst of awakening spring. She chooses a spot, clears it, digs it and carpets it. Then she erects her somewhat shapeless waxen cells, stores these with honey and pollen, lays and hatches the eggs, tends and nourishes the larvae that spring to life, and soon is surrounded by a troop of daughters who aid her in all her labours, within the nest and without, while some of them soon begin to lay in their turn. The construction of the cells improves; the colony grows, the comfort increases. The foundress is still its soul, its principal mother, and finds herself now at the head of a kingdom which might be the model of that of our honeybee. But the model is still in the rough.

The bumblebees, those big, furry, noisy creatures that we're all familiar with, are completely harmless despite their fierce appearance. They initially lead a solitary life. At the start of March, the fertilized female that made it through the winter begins to build her nest, either underground or in a bush, depending on her species. She is alone in the world as spring begins to awaken. She picks a spot, clears it out, digs it, and lines it with materials. Then she constructs her somewhat misshapen waxy cells, fills them with honey and pollen, lays eggs, and hatches them. She cares for and feeds the larvae that emerge, and soon she's surrounded by a group of daughters who help her with all her tasks, both inside and outside the nest, while some of them start laying eggs themselves. The construction of the cells gets better; the colony grows, and their living conditions improve. The original female is still the heart of it all, the main mother, and now she leads a little kingdom that resembles that of our honeybees. But it’s still just getting started.

The prosperity of the humble-bees never exceeds a certain limit, their laws are ill-defined and ill-obeyed, primitive cannibalism and infanticide reappear at intervals, the architecture is shapeless and entails much waste of material; but the cardinal difference between the two cities is that the one is permanent, and the other ephemeral. For, indeed, that of the humble-bee will perish in the autumn; its three or four hundred inhabitants will die, leaving no trace of their passage or their endeavours; and but a single female will survive, who, the next spring, in the same solitude and poverty as her mother before her, will recommence the same useless work. The idea, however, has now grown aware of its strength. Among the humble-bees it goes no further than we have stated, but, faithful to its habits and pursuing its usual routine, it will immediately undergo a sort of unwearying metempsychosis, and re-incarnate itself, trembling with its last triumph, rendered all-powerful now and nearly perfect, in another group, the last but one of the race, that which immediately precedes our domestic bee wherein it attains its crown; the group of the Meliponitae, which comprises the tropical Meliponae and Trigonae.

The prosperity of the humble bees never goes beyond a certain point; their rules are vague and often ignored, primitive cannibalism and infanticide pop up from time to time, and their buildings are messy, wasting a lot of resources. However, the main difference between the two kinds of bees is that one is permanent while the other is temporary. The humble bee colony will die off in the autumn; its three or four hundred members will pass away, leaving no evidence of their existence or efforts, and only one female will survive. The next spring, in the same isolation and poverty as her mother, she will start the same pointless work again. However, the concept is now aware of its power. Among the humble bees, it doesn’t extend beyond what we’ve mentioned, but true to its nature and following its typical pattern, it will undergo a kind of relentless cycle of rebirth and will manifest itself again, invigorated by its last success, now all-powerful and nearly perfect, in another group, the second to last of the lineage, which precedes our domestic bee and where it reaches its peak—the group of the Meliponitae, which includes the tropical Meliponae and Trigonae.

{108}

{108}

Here the organisation is as complete as in our hives. There is an unique mother, there are sterile workers and males. Certain details even seem better devised. The males, for instance, are not wholly idle; they secrete wax. The entrance to the hive is more carefully guarded; it has a door that can be closed when nights are cold, and when these are warm a kind of curtain will admit the air.

Here, the organization is as complete as in our hives. There’s a single queen, along with sterile worker bees and drones. Some details even seem better designed. For example, the drones aren't completely idle; they produce wax. The entrance to the hive is more carefully protected; it has a door that can be shut when the nights are cold, and during warm nights, a sort of curtain allows fresh air in.

But the republic is less strong, general life less assured, prosperity more limited, than with our bees; and wherever these are introduced, the Meliponitae tend to disappear before them. In both races the fraternal idea has undergone equal and magnificent development, save in one point alone, wherein it achieves no further advance among the Meliponitae than among the limited offspring of the humble-bees. In the mechanical organisation of distributed labour, in the precise economy of effort; briefly, in the architecture of the city, they display manifest inferiority. As to this I need only refer to what I said in section 42 of this book, while adding that, whereas in the hives of our Apitae all the cells are equally available for the rearing of the brood and the storage of provisions, and endure as long as the city itself, they serve only one of these purposes among the Meliponitae, and the cells employed as cradles for the nymphs are destroyed after these have been hatched.*

But the republic is less robust, everyday life less certain, and prosperity more restricted than with our bees; and wherever these are introduced, the Meliponitae tend to fade away before them. In both types, the sense of community has seen an equal and remarkable development, except in one area where it doesn't progress further among the Meliponitae than among the limited offspring of the humble bees. In terms of the organization of labor, efficiency of effort, and the overall design of their cities, they show clear inferiority. I only need to point to what I mentioned in section 42 of this book, while adding that, while in the hives of our Apitae all cells are equally available for raising the young and storing supplies, and they last as long as the city itself, they serve only one of these functions among the Meliponitae, and the cells used as nurseries for the nymphs are destroyed after they have hatched.*

     *It is not certain that the principle of unique royalty, or
     maternity, is strictly observed among the Meliponitae.
     Blanchard remarks very justly, that as they possess no sting
     and are consequently less readily able than the mothers of
     our own bees to kill each other, several queens will
     probably live together in the same hive. But certainty on
     this point has hitherto been unattainable owing to the great
     resemblance that exists between queens and workers, as also
     to the impossibility of rearing the Meliponitae in our
     climate.
     *It’s not clear if the principle of unique royalty, or maternity, is strictly followed among the Meliponitae. Blanchard rightly points out that since they have no sting and are therefore less able than the queens of our bees to fight each other, it’s likely that several queens can live together in the same hive. However, certainty on this matter has been elusive due to the strong similarities between queens and workers, as well as the difficulty of raising Meliponitae in our climate.

It is in our domestic bees, therefore, that the idea, of whose movements we have given a cursory and incomplete picture, attains its most perfect form. Are these movements definitely, and for all time, arrested in each one of these species, and does the connecting-line exist in our imagination alone? Let us not be too eager to establish a system in this ill-explored region. Let our conclusions be only provisional, and preferentially such as convey the utmost hope, for, were a choice forced upon us, occasional gleams would appear to declare that the inferences we are most desirous to draw will prove to be truest. Besides, let us not forget that our ignorance still is profound. We are only learning to open our eyes. A thousand experiments that could be made have as yet not even been tried. If the Prosopes, for instance, were imprisoned, and forced to cohabit with their kind, would they, in course of time, overstep the iron barrier of total solitude, and be satisfied to live the common life of the Dasypodae, or to put forth the fraternal effort of the Panurgi? And if we imposed abnormal conditions upon the Panurgi, would these, in their turn, progress from a general corridor to general cells? If the mothers of the humble-bees were compelled to hibernate together, would they arrive at a mutual understanding, a mutual division of labour? Have combs of foundation-wax been offered to the Meliponitae? Would they accept them, would they make use of them, would they conform their habits to this unwonted architecture? Questions, these, that we put to Very tiny creatures; and yet they contain the great word of our greatest secrets. We cannot answer them, for our experience dates but from yesterday. Starting with Reaumur, about a hundred and fifty years have elapsed since the habits of wild bees first received attention. Reaumur was acquainted with only a few of them; we have since then observed a few more; but hundreds, thousands perhaps, have hitherto been noticed only by hasty and ignorant travellers. The habits of those that are known to us have undergone no change since the author of the "Memoirs" published his valuable work; and the humble-bees, all powdered with gold, and vibrant as the sun's delectable murmur, that in the year 1730 gorged themselves with honey in the gardens of Charenton, were absolutely identical with those that to-morrow, when April returns, will be humming in the woods of Vincennes, but a few yards away. From Reaumur's day to our own, however, is but as the twinkling of an eye; and many lives of men, placed end to end, form but a second in the history of Nature's thought.

In our domestic bees, the concept we have only briefly and incompletely explored reaches its most refined expression. Are these behaviors truly set in stone for each species, or do they only exist in our imagination? We shouldn’t rush to develop a system in this little understood area. Let’s keep our conclusions tentative and focus on those that bring the most optimism, because if we had to choose, the occasional insights we catch might indicate that the conclusions we most hope for are the most accurate. Also, we must remember that our ignorance is still deep. We are just beginning to learn how to truly see. There are countless experiments that haven’t even been attempted yet. For example, if the Prosopes were trapped and forced to live with their own kind, would they eventually break through the harsh barrier of complete isolation and adapt to the shared lifestyle of the Dasypodae, or work together like the Panurgi? And if we put unusual conditions on the Panurgi, would they then evolve from a general corridor to shared cells? If the mothers of the humble-bees were made to hibernate together, would they find a way to communicate and divide tasks? Have combs made of foundation-wax been offered to the Meliponitae? Would they accept them, use them, and adjust their behaviors to this unfamiliar design? These are questions we ask of tiny creatures, yet they hold significant keys to our greatest mysteries. We can't answer them because our experience only goes back to yesterday. Since Reaumur's time, about one hundred and fifty years ago, the behaviors of wild bees have first caught our attention. Reaumur knew a few of them; we have since identified a few more, but hundreds or perhaps thousands have only been observed by hasty and uninformed travelers. The behaviors of those we do know have not changed since Reaumur published his insightful work; the humble-bees, all dusted with gold and buzzing with the sun's delightful hum, that in 1730 fed on honey in the gardens of Charenton are exactly the same as those that will buzz in the Vincennes woods just a few yards away when April comes again. Yet, the time from Reaumur’s day to now is just a blink in the grand timeline of Nature's ideas, and many lifetimes lined up together form just a brief moment in that history.

{109}

{109}

Although the idea that our eyes have followed attains its supreme expression in our domestic bees, it must not be inferred therefrom that the hive reveals no faults. There is one masterpiece, the hexagonal cell, that touches absolute perfection,—a perfection that all the geniuses in the world, were they to meet in conclave, could in no way enhance. No living creature, not even man, has achieved, in the centre of his sphere, what the bee has achieved in her own; and were some one from another world to descend and ask of the earth the most perfect creation of the logic of life, we should needs have to offer the humble comb of honey.

Although the idea that our eyes have followed reaches its peak expression in our domestic bees, it shouldn't be assumed that the hive has no imperfections. There is one masterpiece, the hexagonal cell, that embodies absolute perfection—a perfection that no amount of genius in the world could improve. No living creature, not even humans, has achieved what the bee has accomplished in its own realm; and if someone from another world were to come down and ask for the earth’s most perfect creation in terms of life's logic, we would have to present the humble honeycomb.

But the level of this perfection is not maintained throughout. We have already dealt with a few faults and shortcomings, evident sometimes and sometimes mysterious, such as the ruinous superabundance and idleness of the males, parthenogenesis, the perils of the nuptial flight, excessive swarming, the absence of pity, and the almost monstrous sacrifice of the individual to society. To these must be added a strange inclination to store enormous masses of pollen, far in excess of their needs; for the pollen, soon turning rancid, and hardening, encumbers the surface of the comb; and further, the long sterile interregnum between the date of the first swarm and the impregnation of the second queen, etc., etc.

But this level of perfection isn't consistent. We've already discussed some faults and issues, which can be obvious at times and mysterious at others, like the excessive numbers and inactivity of the males, parthenogenesis, the dangers of the nuptial flight, over-swarming, the lack of compassion, and the almost bizarre sacrifice of the individual for the group. Additionally, there's a strange tendency to hoard huge amounts of pollen, far more than they actually need; the pollen quickly goes bad and hardens, cluttering the surface of the comb. Also, there’s the long, unproductive gap between the first swarm and the fertilization of the second queen, and so on.

Of these faults the gravest, the only one which in our climates is invariably fatal, is the repeated swarming. But here we must bear in mind that the natural selection of the domestic bee has for thousands of years been thwarted by man. From the Egyptian of the time of Pharaoh to the peasant of our own day, the bee-keeper has always acted in opposition to the desires and advantages of the race. The most prosperous hives are those which throw only one swarm after the beginning of summer. They have fulfilled their maternal duties, assured the maintenance of the stock and the necessary renewal of queens; they have guaranteed the future of the swarm, which, being precocious and ample in numbers, has time to erect solid and well-stored dwellings before the arrival of autumn. If left to themselves, it is clear that these hives and their offshoots would have been the only ones to survive the rigours of winter, which would almost invariably have destroyed colonies animated by different instincts; and the law of restricted swarming would therefore by slow degrees have established itself in our northern races. But it is precisely these prudent, opulent, acclimatised hives that man has always destroyed in order to possess himself of their treasure. He has permitted only—he does so to this day in ordinary practice—the feeblest colonies to survive; degenerate stock, secondary or tertiary swarms, which have just barely sufficient food to subsist through the winter, or whose miserable store he will supplement perhaps with a few droppings of honey. The result is, probably, that the race has grown feebler, that the tendency to excessive swarming has been hereditarily developed, and that to-day almost all our bees, particularly the black ones, swarm too often. For some years now the new methods of "movable" apiculture have gone some way towards correcting this dangerous habit; and when we reflect how rapidly artificial selection acts on most of our domestic animals, such as oxen, dogs, pigeons, sheep and horses, it is permissible to believe that we shall before long have a race of bees that will entirely renounce natural swarming and devote all their activity to the collection of honey and pollen.

Of these issues, the most serious one, and the only one that is always deadly in our climates, is repeated swarming. However, we need to remember that human intervention has disrupted the natural selection of domestic bees for thousands of years. From the Egyptians in Pharaoh's time to today's farmers, beekeepers have consistently acted against the needs and benefits of their bees. The most successful hives are those that only produce one swarm after summer begins. They have fulfilled their motherly roles, ensured the survival of the colony, and successfully renewed their queens; they have secured the future of the swarm, which, being early and numerous, has time to build solid and well-stocked homes before autumn arrives. If left alone, it’s clear that these hives and their offshoots would have been the only ones to survive the harshness of winter, which would almost always wipe out colonies driven by different instincts; thus, the rule of limited swarming would have gradually established itself in our northern species. However, these cautious, thriving, and well-adapted hives are precisely those that humans have always destroyed to get their honey. They have allowed only the weakest colonies to survive—degenerate stock, secondary or tertiary swarms, which barely have enough food to make it through winter, or whose meager supplies they might supplement with a few drops of honey. As a result, it's likely that the species has weakened, developing a hereditary tendency for excessive swarming, and today almost all our bees, especially the black ones, swarm too frequently. In recent years, new methods of "movable" beekeeping have started to address this problematic behavior; and when we consider how quickly artificial selection influences many of our domestic animals, like cattle, dogs, pigeons, sheep, and horses, we can reasonably believe that we will soon have a breed of bees that completely abandons natural swarming and focuses all their efforts on gathering honey and pollen.

{110}

{110}

But for the other faults: might not an intelligence that possessed a clearer consciousness of the aim of common life emancipate itself from them? Much might be said concerning these faults, which emanate now from what is unknown to us in the hive, now from swarming and its resultant errors, for which we are partly to blame. But let every man judge for himself, and, having seen what has gone before, let him grant or deny intelligence to the bees, as he may think proper. I am not eager to defend them. It seems to me that in many circumstances they give proof of understanding, but my curiosity would not be less were all that they do done blindly. It is interesting to watch a brain possessed of extraordinary resources within itself wherewith it may combat cold and hunger, death, time, space, and solitude, all the enemies of matter that is springing to life; but should a creature succeed in maintaining its little profound and complicated existence without overstepping the boundaries of instinct, without doing anything but what is ordinary, that would be very interesting too, and very extraordinary. Restore the ordinary and the marvellous to their veritable place in the bosom of nature, and their values shift; one equals the other. We find that their names are usurped; and that it is not they, but the things we cannot understand or explain that should arrest our attention, refresh our activity, and give a new and juster form to our thoughts and feelings and words. There is wisdom in attaching oneself to nought beside.

But regarding the other faults: couldn’t an intelligence that has a clearer understanding of the purpose of everyday life free itself from them? There’s a lot to discuss about these faults, which sometimes come from what remains unknown to us in the hive and sometimes from swarming and the inevitable mistakes that follow, for which we share some responsibility. However, let everyone judge for themselves, and after considering what has come before, let them decide whether or not to attribute intelligence to bees, as they see fit. I’m not particularly eager to defend them. It seems to me that in many situations they demonstrate understanding, but my curiosity wouldn’t diminish if everything they do were done blindly. It’s fascinating to observe a brain with extraordinary resources that it uses to fight against cold, hunger, death, time, space, and solitude—all the enemies of living matter; but if a creature manages to sustain its intricate existence without going beyond instinct and only does what is ordinary, that would be interesting too, and quite remarkable. If we restore the ordinary and the marvelous to their true place in nature, their values change; one equals the other. We find that their names are misattributed; it’s not them, but the things we can’t comprehend or explain that should capture our attention, invigorate our actions, and give a new and more accurate shape to our thoughts, feelings, and words. There’s wisdom in clinging to nothing else.

{111}

{111}

And further, our intellect is not the proper tribunal before which to summon the bees, and pass their faults in review. Do we not find, among ourselves, that consciousness and intellect long will dwell in the midst of errors and faults without perceiving them, longer still without effecting a remedy? If a being exist whom his destiny calls upon most specially, almost organically, to live and to organise common life in accordance with pure reason, that being is man. And yet see what he makes of it, compare the mistakes of the hive with those of our own society. How should we marvel, for instance, were we bees observing men, as we noted the unjust, illogical distribution of work among a race of creatures that in other directions appear to manifest eminent reason! We should find the earth's surface, unique source of all common life, insufficiently, painfully cultivated by two or three tenths of the whole population; we should find another tenth absolutely idle, usurping the larger share of the products of this first labour; and the remaining seven-tenths condemned to a life of perpetual half-hunger, ceaselessly exhausting themselves in strange and sterile efforts whereby they never shall profit, but only shall render more complex and more inexplicable still the life of the idle. We should conclude that the reason and moral sense of these beings must belong to a world entirely different from our own, and that they must obey principles hopelessly beyond our comprehension. But let us carry this review of our faults no further. They are always present in our thoughts, though their presence achieves but little. From century to century only will one of them for a moment shake off its slumber, and send forth a bewildered cry; stretch the aching arm that supported its head, shift its position, and then lie down and fall asleep once more, until a new pain, born of the dreary fatigue of repose, awaken it afresh.

And besides, our intellect isn't the right judge to call out the bees and look at their flaws. Don't we see that our own awareness and intellect often ignore errors and faults for a long time and take even longer to find a solution? If there's a being whose purpose is especially, almost inherently, to live and organize common life according to pure reason, it’s humans. Yet, just look at how we handle it; compare the mistakes of the hive to those of our society. Imagine if we were bees observing humans, noticing the unfair and illogical distribution of work among a species that otherwise shows great reason! We’d see that the earth, the unique source of all common life, is only poorly cultivated by two or three tenths of the entire population; another tenth completely idle, taking a larger share of the results of that initial labor; and the remaining seven-tenths forced to live in constant semi-hunger, endlessly working in strange and futile ways that won’t benefit them, only complicating life for the idle even more. We would think that the reason and moral sense of these beings must come from a completely different world and that they follow principles hopelessly beyond our understanding. But let's not dwell on our faults any longer. They're always on our minds, although they don't change much. Only from century to century does one of them briefly wake up, let out a confused cry, stretch the tired arm that held up its head, shift around a bit, and then lie back down to sleep until a new pain, caused by the dull fatigue of rest, jolts it awake again.

{112}

{112}

The evolution of the Apiens, or at least of the Apitae, being admitted, or regarded as more probable than that they should have remained stationary, let us now consider the general, constant direction that this evolution takes. It seems to follow the same roads as with ourselves. It tends palpably to lessen the struggle, insecurity, and wretchedness of the race, to augment authority and comfort, and stimulate favourable chances. To this end it will unhesitatingly sacrifice the individual, bestowing general strength and happiness in exchange for the illusory and mournful independence of solitude. It is as though Nature were of the opinion with which Thucydides credits Pericles: viz., that individuals are happier in the bosom of a prosperous city, even though they suffer themselves, than when individually prospering in the midst of a languishing state. It protects the hardworking slave in the powerful city, while those who have no duties, whose association is only precarious, are abandoned to the nameless, formless enemies who dwell in the minutes of time, in the movements of the universe, and in the recesses of space. This is not the moment to discuss the scheme of nature, or to ask ourselves whether it would be well for man to follow it; but it is certain that wherever the infinite mass allows us to seize the appearance of an idea, the appearance takes this road whereof we know not the end. Let it be enough that we note the persistent care with which nature preserves, and fixes in the evolving race, all that has been won from the hostile inertia of matter. She records each happy effort, and contrives we know not what special and benevolent laws to counteract the inevitable recoil. This progress, whose existence among the most intelligent species can scarcely be denied, has perhaps no aim beyond its initial impetus, and knows not whither it goes. But at least, in a world where nothing save a few facts of this kind indicates a precise will, it is significant enough that we should see certain creatures rising thus, slowly and continuously; and should the bees have revealed to us only this mysterious spiral of light in the overpowering darkness, that were enough to induce us not to regret the time we have given to their little gestures and humble habits, which seem so far away and are yet so nearly akin to our grand passions and arrogant destinies.

The evolution of the Apiens, or at least the Apitae, is accepted or seen as more likely than that they would have remained unchanged. So, let's now look at the overall, consistent direction this evolution takes. It seems to follow the same paths as ours. It clearly tends to reduce the struggle, insecurity, and misery of the species, while increasing authority and comfort, and promoting favorable opportunities. To achieve this, it will readily sacrifice the individual, providing general strength and happiness in exchange for the illusory and sorrowful independence of solitude. It’s as if Nature agrees with Thucydides’ portrayal of Pericles: that individuals are happier in a thriving city, even if they suffer, than when they are individually successful in a failing state. It protects the hardworking individual in the strong city, while those without obligations, whose associations are only temporary, are left to face the nameless, formless threats that exist in the moments of time, in the flow of the universe, and in the depths of space. This is not the time to debate Nature's plan or question whether it would be good for humanity to follow it; however, it is clear that wherever the vast cosmos allows us to grasp the essence of an idea, it tends to follow a path whose end we do not know. It suffices to observe the ongoing care with which nature safeguards and solidifies in the evolving species all that has been gained from the hostile inertia of matter. She notes each positive effort and devises unknown special and beneficial laws to counteract the unavoidable pushback. This progress, whose presence among the most intelligent species can hardly be denied, may have no purpose beyond its initial drive and may not know where it’s headed. But at least, in a world where only a few facts of this sort indicate a definite intention, it’s noteworthy that we can see certain beings rising slowly and steadily. And if the bees have only shown us this mysterious spiral of light amid the overwhelming darkness, that would be enough to make us appreciate the time we spent observing their small actions and modest routines, which seem so distant yet are so closely related to our great passions and lofty destinies.

{113}

{113}

It may be that these things are all vain; and that our own spiral of light, no less than that of the bees, has been kindled for no other purpose save that of amusing the darkness. So, too, is it possible that some stupendous incident may suddenly surge from without, from another world, from a new phenomenon, and either inform this effort with definitive meaning, or definitively destroy it. But we must proceed on our way as though nothing abnormal could ever befall us. Did we know that to-morrow some revelation, a message, for instance, from a more ancient, more luminous planet than ours, were to root up our nature, to suppress the laws, the passions, and radical truths of our being, our wisest plan still would be to devote the whole of to-day to the study of these passions, these laws, and these truths, which must blend and accord in our mind; and to remain faithful to the destiny imposed on us, which is to subdue, and to some extent raise within and around us the obscure forces of life.

It might be that all of this is pointless; and that our own spiral of light, just like that of the bees, has been ignited for no other reason than to entertain the darkness. It's also possible that some incredible event could suddenly emerge from beyond, from another world, or from a new phenomenon, and either give this effort a definitive purpose or completely obliterate it. But we have to carry on as if nothing unusual could ever happen to us. If we knew that tomorrow some revelation, say, a message from a more ancient, more brilliant planet than ours, was going to shake our very existence, undermining the laws, passions, and fundamental truths of our being, our best plan would still be to spend all of today examining these passions, these laws, and these truths, which must connect and harmonize in our minds; and to stay true to the destiny placed upon us, which is to tame and, to some extent, elevate the obscure forces of life both within and around us.

None of these, perhaps, will survive the new revelation; but the soul of those who shall up to the end have fulfilled the mission that is pre-eminently the mission of man, must inevitably be in the front rank of all to welcome this revelation; and should they learn therefrom that indifference, or resignation to the unknown, is the veritable duty, they will be better equipped than the others for the comprehension of this final resignation and indifference, better able to turn these to account.

None of these will likely withstand the new revelation; however, the souls of those who have faithfully fulfilled the mission that is fundamentally the mission of humanity will surely be at the forefront to welcome this revelation. If they discover that indifference or acceptance of the unknown is the true duty, they will be better prepared than others to understand this ultimate acceptance and indifference and to make the most of it.

{114}

{114}

But such speculations may well be avoided. Let not the possibility of general annihilation blur our perception of the task before us; above all, let us not count on the miraculous aid of chance. Hitherto, the promises of our imagination notwithstanding, we have always been left to ourselves, to our own resources. It is to our humblest efforts that every useful, enduring achievement of this earth is due. It is open to us, if we choose, to await the better or worse that may follow some alien accident, but on condition that such expectation shall not hinder our human task. Here again do the bees, as Nature always, provide a most excellent lesson. In the hive there has truly been prodigious intervention. The bees are in the hands of a power capable of annihilating or modifying their race, of transforming their destinies; the bees' thraldom is far more definite than our own. Therefore none the less do they perform their profound and primitive duty. And, among them, it is precisely those whose obedience to duty is most complete who are able most fully to profit by the supernatural intervention that to-day has raised the destiny of their species. And indeed, to discover the unconquerable duty of a being is less difficult than one imagines. It is ever to be read in the distinguishing organs, whereto the others are all subordinate. And just as it is written in the tongue, the stomach, and mouth of the bee that it must make honey, so is it written in our eyes, our ears, our nerves, our marrow, in every lobe of our head, that we must make cerebral substance; nor is there need that we should divine the purpose this substance shall serve. The bees know not whether they will eat the honey they harvest, as we know not who it is shall reap the profit of the cerebral substance we shall have formed, or of the intelligent fluid that issues therefrom and spreads over the universe, perishing when our life ceases or persisting after our death. As they go from flower to flower collecting more honey than themselves and their offspring can need, let us go from reality to reality seeking food for the incomprehensible flame, and thus, certain of having fulfilled our organic duty, preparing ourselves for whatever befall. Let us nourish this flame on our feelings and passions, on all that we see and think, that we hear and touch, on its own essence, which is the idea it derives from the discoveries, experience and observation that result from its every movement. A time then will come when all things will turn so naturally to good in a spirit that has given itself to the loyal desire of this simple human duty, that the very suspicion of the possible aimlessness of its exhausting effort will only render the duty the clearer, will only add more purity, power, disinterestedness, and freedom to the ardour wherewith it still seeks.

But we can avoid such speculations. Let's not let the possibility of total destruction cloud our view of the task before us; most importantly, let's not rely on the miraculous help of chance. Until now, despite the promises of our imagination, we've always had to depend on ourselves and our resources. Every useful, lasting achievement on this earth comes from our humble efforts. We can choose to wait for the better or worse that might come from some external event, but only if this expectation doesn’t hinder our human task. Here again, the bees, as is typical of nature, offer a great lesson. In the hive, there has indeed been tremendous intervention. The bees are under a power that can destroy or change their species and transform their futures; their servitude is much more certain than our own. Nevertheless, they perform their deep and fundamental duty. Among them, those who are most obedient to their duty are the ones who benefit the most from the supernatural intervention that has elevated their species' fate today. In fact, discovering the indomitable duty of a being is often easier than one thinks. It can always be found in the defining traits, to which all others are subordinate. Just as the need for bees to make honey is written in their tongues, stomachs, and mouths, so is the need for us to create thinking substance written in our eyes, ears, nerves, and every part of our heads; we don't even need to figure out what this substance will be used for. The bees don’t know if they will eat the honey they gather, just as we don’t know who will benefit from the thinking substance we create, or from the intelligent thoughts that arise from it and spread throughout the universe, lasting beyond our lives or perishing when we die. As they move from flower to flower, collecting more honey than they and their offspring can consume, let’s move from reality to reality in search of nourishment for the incomprehensible flame, ensuring we have fulfilled our organic duty while preparing for whatever happens. Let’s feed this flame with our feelings and passions, everything we see and think, everything we hear and touch, and its own essence, which comes from the ideas formed through discoveries, experiences, and observations that result from its every movement. A time will come when everything will align towards good in a spirit that has devoted itself to the sincere desire for this simple human duty, making any doubt about the potential futility of its exhausting efforts only clarify the duty, adding more purity, strength, selflessness, and freedom to the passion with which it continues to seek.





APPENDIX

TO give a complete bibliography of the bee were outside the scope of this book; we shall be satisfied, therefore, merely to indicate the more interesting works:—

TO provide a complete bibliography of the bee would be beyond the scope of this book; so we will only highlight the more interesting works:—

1. The Historical Development of Apiarian Science:

1. The Historical Development of Beekeeping Science:

(a) The ancient writers: Aristotle, "History of Animals" (Trans. Bart. St. Hilaire); T. Varro, "De Agricultura," L. III. xvi.; Pliny, "Hist. Nat.," L. xi.; Columella, "De Re Rustica;" "Palladius, "De Re Rustica," L. I. xxxvii., etc.

(a) The ancient writers: Aristotle, "History of Animals" (Trans. Bart. St. Hilaire); T. Varro, "De Agricultura," L. III. xvi.; Pliny, "Hist. Nat.," L. xi.; Columella, "De Re Rustica;" "Palladius, "De Re Rustica," L. I. xxxvii., etc.

(b) The moderns: Swammerdam, "Biblia Naturae," 1737; Maraldi, "Observations sur les Abeilles," 1712; Reaumur, "Memoires pour servir a l'Histoire des Insectes," 1740; Ch. Bonnet, "OEuvres d'Histoire Naturelle," 1779-1783; A. G. Schirach, "Physikalische Untersuchung der bisher unbekannten aber nachher entdeckten Erzeugung der Bienen-mutter," 1767; J. Hunter, "On Bees" (Philosophical Transactions, 1732); J. A. Janscha, "Hinterlassene Vollstandige Lehre von der Bienenzucht," 1773; Francois Huber, "Nouvelles Observations sur les Abeilles," 1794, etc.

(b) The moderns: Swammerdam, "Biblia Naturae," 1737; Maraldi, "Observations on Bees," 1712; Reaumur, "Memoirs to serve the History of Insects," 1740; Ch. Bonnet, "Works of Natural History," 1779-1783; A. G. Schirach, "Physical Investigation of the Previously Unknown but Subsequently Discovered Generation of the Queen Bee," 1767; J. Hunter, "On Bees" (Philosophical Transactions, 1732); J. A. Janscha, "Complete Teachings on Beekeeping," 1773; Francois Huber, "New Observations on Bees," 1794, etc.

2. Practical Apiculture:

2. Practical Beekeeping:

Dzierzon, "Theorie und Praxis des neuen Bienenfreundes;" Langstroth, "The Honeybee"(translated into French by Ch. Dadant: "L'Abeille et la Ruche," which corrects and completes the original); Georges de Layens and Bonnier, "Cours Complet d'Apiculture;" Frank Cheshire, "Bees and Bee-keeping" (vol. ii.—Practical); Dr. E. Bevan, "The Honey-bee;" T. W. Cowan, "The British Bee-keeper's Guidebook;" A. Root, "The A B C of Bee-Culture;" Henry Alien, "The Bee-keeper's Handy-book;" L'Abbe Collin, "Guide du Proprietaire des Abeilles;" Ch. Dadant, "Petit Cours d'Apiculture Pratique;" Ed. Bertrand, "Conduite du Rucher;" Weber, "Manuel pratique d'Apiulture;" Hamet, "Cours Complet d'Api-culture;" De Bauvoys, "Guide de l'Apiculteur;" Pollmann, "Die Biene und ihre Zucht;" Jeker, Kramer, and Theiler, "Der Schweizerische Bienenvater;" S. Simmins, "A Modern Bee Farm;" F. W. Vogel, "Die Honigbiene und die Vermehrung der Bienvolker;" Baron A. Von Berlepsch, "Die Biene und ihre Frucht," etc.

Dzierzon, "Theory and Practice of the New Beekeeper;" Langstroth, "The Honeybee" (translated into French by Ch. Dadant: "L'Abeille et la Ruche," which corrects and completes the original); Georges de Layens and Bonnier, "Complete Course in Beekeeping;" Frank Cheshire, "Bees and Beekeeping" (vol. ii.—Practical); Dr. E. Bevan, "The Honeybee;" T. W. Cowan, "The British Beekeeper's Guidebook;" A. Root, "The ABC of Bee Culture;" Henry Alien, "The Beekeeper's Handbook;" L'Abbe Collin, "Guide for Beekeeping Owners;" Ch. Dadant, "Short Course in Practical Beekeeping;" Ed. Bertrand, "Management of the Apiary;" Weber, "Practical Guide to Beekeeping;" Hamet, "Complete Course in Beekeeping;" De Bauvoys, "Guide for the Beekeeper;" Pollmann, "The Bee and Its Breeding;" Jeker, Kramer, and Theiler, "The Swiss Beekeeper;" S. Simmins, "A Modern Bee Farm;" F. W. Vogel, "The Honeybee and the Multiplication of Bee Colonies;" Baron A. Von Berlepsch, "The Bee and Its Fruit," etc.

3. General Monographs:

3. General Books:

F. Cheshire, "Bees and Bee-keeping" (vol. i.—Scientific); T. W. Cowan, "The Honey-bee;" J. Perez, "Les Abeilles;" Girard, "Manuel d'Apiculture" (Les Abeilles, Organes et Fonctions); Schuckard, "British Bees;" Kirby and Spence, "Introduction to Entomology;" Girdwoyn, "Anatomie et Physiologic de l'Abeille;" F. Cheshire, "Diagrams on the Anatomy of the Honeybee;" Gunderach, "Die Naturgeschichte der Honigbiene;" L. Buchner, "Geistes-leben der Thiere;" O. Butschli, "Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Biene;" J. D. Haviland, "The Social Instincts of Bees, their Origin and Natural Selection."

F. Cheshire, "Bees and Beekeeping" (vol. i.—Scientific); T. W. Cowan, "The Honeybee"; J. Perez, "The Bees"; Girard, "Beekeeping Manual" (The Bees, Organs and Functions); Schuckard, "British Bees"; Kirby and Spence, "Introduction to Entomology"; Girdwoyn, "Anatomy and Physiology of the Bee"; F. Cheshire, "Diagrams on the Anatomy of the Honeybee"; Gunderach, "The Natural History of the Honeybee"; L. Buchner, "The Mental Life of Animals"; O. Butschli, "On the Development of the Bee"; J. D. Haviland, "The Social Instincts of Bees, Their Origin and Natural Selection."

4. Special Monographs (Organs, Functions, Undertakings, etc.):

4. Special Monographs (Organs, Functions, Activities, etc.):

F. Dujardin, "Memoires sur le Systeme nerveux des Insectes;" Dumas and Milne Edwards, "Sur la Production de la Cire des Abeilles;" E. Blanchard, "Recherches anatomiques sur le Systeme nerveux des Insectes;" L. R. D. Brougham, "Observations, Demonstrations, and Experiences upon the Structure of the Cells of Bees;" P. Cameron, "On Parthenogenesis in the Hymenoptera" (Transactions Natural Society of Glasgow, 1888); Erichson, "De Fabrica et Usu Antennarum in Insectis;" B. T. Lowne, "On the Simple and Compound Eyes of Insects "(Philosophical Transactions, 1879); G. K. Waterhouse, "On the Formation of the Cells of Bees and Wasps;" Dr. C. T. E. von Siebold, "On a True Parthenogenesis in Moths and Bees;" F. Leydig, "Das Auge der Gliederthiere;" Pastor Schonfeld, "Bienen-Zeitung," 1854—1883; "Illustrierte Bienen-Zeitung," 1885-1890; Assmuss, "Die Parasiten der Honig-biene."

F. Dujardin, "Memoirs on the Nervous System of Insects;" Dumas and Milne Edwards, "On the Production of Beeswax;" E. Blanchard, "Anatomical Researches on the Nervous System of Insects;" L. R. D. Brougham, "Observations, Demonstrations, and Experiences on the Structure of Bee Cells;" P. Cameron, "On Parthenogenesis in Hymenoptera" (Transactions Natural Society of Glasgow, 1888); Erichson, "On the Structure and Function of Antennae in Insects;" B. T. Lowne, "On the Simple and Compound Eyes of Insects" (Philosophical Transactions, 1879); G. K. Waterhouse, "On the Formation of Cells in Bees and Wasps;" Dr. C. T. E. von Siebold, "On True Parthenogenesis in Moths and Bees;" F. Leydig, "The Eye of Articulates;" Pastor Schonfeld, "Bee Newspaper," 1854—1883; "Illustrated Bee Newspaper," 1885-1890; Assmuss, "The Parasites of the Honeybee."

5. Notes on Melliferous Hymenoptera:

Notes on Honeybee Species:

E. Blanchard, "Metamorphoses, Moeurs et Instincts des Insectes;" Vid: "Histoire des Insectes;" Darwin, "Origin of Species;" Fabre, "Souvenirs Entomologiques" (3d series); Romanes, "Mental Evolution in Animals;" id., "Animal Intelligence;" Lepeletier et Fargeau, "Histoire Naturelle des Hymenopteres;" V. Mayet, "Memoire sur les Moeurs et sur les Metamorphoses d'une Nouvelle Espece de la Famille des Vesicants" (Ann. Soc. Entom. de France, 1875); H. Muller, "Ein Beitrag zur Lebensgeschichte der Dasypoda Hirtipes;" E. Hoffer, "Biologische Beobachtungen an Hummeln und Schmarotzerhummeln;" Jesse, "Gleanings in Natural History;" Sir John Lubbock, "Ants, Bees, and Wasps;" id., "The Senses, Instincts, and Intelligence of Animals;" Walkenaer, "Les Haclites;" Westwood, "Introduction to the Study of Insects;" V. Rendu, "De l'Intelligence des Betes;" Espinas, "Animal Communities," etc.

E. Blanchard, "Metamorphoses, Behavior and Instincts of Insects;" Vid: "History of Insects;" Darwin, "Origin of Species;" Fabre, "Entomological Memories" (3rd series); Romanes, "Mental Evolution in Animals;" id., "Animal Intelligence;" Lepeletier and Fargeau, "Natural History of Hymenoptera;" V. Mayet, "Memoir on the Behavior and Metamorphoses of a New Species in the Family of Vesicants" (Ann. Soc. Entom. de France, 1875); H. Muller, "A Contribution to the Life History of the Dasypoda Hirtipes;" E. Hoffer, "Biological Observations on Bumblebees and Cuckoo Bumblebees;" Jesse, "Gleanings in Natural History;" Sir John Lubbock, "Ants, Bees, and Wasps;" id., "The Senses, Instincts, and Intelligence of Animals;" Walkenaer, "The Haclites;" Westwood, "Introduction to the Study of Insects;" V. Rendu, "On the Intelligence of Beasts;" Espinas, "Animal Communities," etc.








Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!