This is a modern-English version of Signers of the Declaration: Historic Places Commemorating the Signing of the Declaration of Independence, originally written by unknown author(s). It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.

Transcriber’s Note

Transcription Note

Cover created by Transcriber and placed in the Public Domain.

Cover created by Transcriber and placed in the Public Domain.

ii

ii

Independence Hall in 1776. Here the Continental Congress adopted and signed the Declaration of Independence.

Signers of the Declaration

John Trumbull’s “The Declaration of Independence” hangs in the rotunda of the U.S. Capitol. Depicting the drafting committee presenting the document to the Continental Congress, the painting commemorates the signers.

THE NATIONAL SURVEY OF HISTORIC SITES AND BUILDINGS • VOLUME XVIII

THE NATIONAL SURVEY OF HISTORIC SITES AND BUILDINGS • VOLUME XVIII

Signers
OF THE DECLARATION

Signers of the Declaration


Historic Places Commemorating the Signing
of the Declaration of Independence

Historic Places Commemorating the Signing
of the Declaration of Independence

ROBERT G. FERRIS
Series Editor

ROBERT G. FERRIS
Series Editor

Department Seal

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

Washington, D.C. 1973

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

Washington, D.C. 1973


ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Ernest A. Connally

OFFICE OF ARCHEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Robert M. Utley, Director

DIVISION OF HISTORY
A. Russell Mortensen, Chief

HISTORIC SITES SURVEY
Horace J. Sheely, Jr., Chief

ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Ernest A. Connally

OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Robert M. Utley, Director

DIVISION OF HISTORY
A. Russell Mortensen, Chief

HISTORIC SITES SURVEY
Horace J. Sheely, Jr., Chief

This volume incorporates a comprehensive survey of sites and buildings associated with the signers accomplished by Charles W. Snell and the late John O. Littleton. Also utilized were survey and evaluation reports authored by the following individuals: S. Sydney Bradford, Charles E. Hatch, Jr., W. Brown Morton III, Denys Peter Myers, John D. R. Platt, Frank B. Sarles, Jr., Charles E. Shedd, Jr., Horace J. Sheely, Jr., and Martin I. Yoelson. These surveys and reports were reviewed by the Advisory Board on National Parks, Historic Sites, Buildings, and Monuments. Members of this group are listed in the Acknowledgments. Directly involved in all aspects of the preparation of this book were Assistant Editor Richard E. Morris and Editorial Assistant James H. Charleton. It was designed by Gary Gore.

This volume includes a thorough survey of sites and buildings connected to the signers, done by Charles W. Snell and the late John O. Littleton. Also referenced were survey and evaluation reports written by the following individuals: S. Sydney Bradford, Charles E. Hatch, Jr., W. Brown Morton III, Denys Peter Myers, John D. R. Platt, Frank B. Sarles, Jr., Charles E. Shedd, Jr., Horace J. Sheely, Jr., and Martin I. Yoelson. These surveys and reports were reviewed by the Advisory Board on National Parks, Historic Sites, Buildings, and Monuments. The members of this group are listed in the Acknowledgments. Assisting in all aspects of the book's preparation were Assistant Editor Richard E. Morris and Editorial Assistant James H. Charleton. The design was done by Gary Gore.

THIS BOOK IS ISSUED AS PART OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE OBSERVANCE OF OUR NATION’S BICENTENNIAL.

THIS BOOK IS PUBLISHED AS PART OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE'S CELEBRATION OF OUR NATION’S BICENTENNIAL.

As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has basic responsibilities for water, fish, wildlife, mineral, land, park, and recreational resources. Indian and Territorial affairs are other major concerns of America’s “Department of Natural Resources.” The Department works to assure the wisest choice in managing all our resources so each will make its full contribution to a better United States—now and in the future.

As the main conservation agency in the country, the Department of the Interior has fundamental responsibilities for water, fish, wildlife, minerals, land, parks, and recreational resources. Indian and Territorial affairs are also significant concerns for America’s “Department of Natural Resources.” The Department strives to ensure that we make the best decisions in managing all our resources so that each can fully contribute to a better United States—both now and in the future.

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 73-600028

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 73-600028


For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 · Price $5.65
Stock Number 2405-00496

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 · Price $5.65
Stock Number 2405-00496


v

v

Foreword

As we approach the two hundredth anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, each of us is stirred by the memory of those who framed the future of our country.

As we near the two hundredth anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, we are all moved by the memories of those who shaped the future of our nation.

In the coming years we will have many opportunities to refresh our understanding of what America means, but none can mean more than personal visits to the sites where freedom was forged and our founding fathers actually made the decisions which have stood the severest tests of time.

In the years ahead, we will have plenty of chances to reevaluate what America represents, but none will be as meaningful as visiting the places where freedom was created and where our founding fathers made decisions that have withstood the toughest tests of time.

I remember my reactions, for example, when I visited Independence Hall in Philadelphia in 1972 to sign the new revenue sharing legislation. Walking into the building where that small group of patriots gathered some two centuries ago, I thought back to what it must have been like when the giants of our American heritage solemnly committed themselves and their children to liberty. The dilemmas they faced, the uncertainties they felt, the ideals they cherished—all seemed more alive to me than ever before, and I came away with an even stronger appreciation for their courage and their vision.

I remember how I felt when I visited Independence Hall in Philadelphia in 1972 to sign the new revenue sharing legislation. As I walked into the building where that small group of patriots met two centuries ago, I thought about what it must have been like when the great figures of our American history solemnly dedicated themselves and their children to freedom. The challenges they faced, the doubts they had, the values they held dear—all felt more real to me than ever before, and I left with an even greater appreciation for their bravery and their vision.

As people from all over the world visit the places described in this valuable book, they, too, will feel the excitement of history and relive in their minds the beginnings of a great Nation.

As people from around the globe visit the locations mentioned in this valuable book, they will also experience the thrill of history and mentally revisit the beginnings of a great nation.

I commend this book to your attention and encourage all people, Americans and foreigners alike, to make a special effort to visit our historic sites during these Bicentennial years.

I recommend this book to you and urge everyone, both Americans and international visitors, to take the time to explore our historic sites during this Bicentennial celebration.

The White House
Washington, D.C.

The White House
Washington, D.C.

(signature)
Richard Nixon

vii

vii

Preface

Nearly two hundred years have passed since America proclaimed her independence. Yet this action and the beliefs and hopes motivating those responsible for it are as central to us as a people today as they were to Abraham Lincoln, whose words still remind us that “... our fathers brought forth upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal....”

Nearly two hundred years have passed since America declared its independence. Yet this event and the ideals and aspirations that inspired it are just as important to us today as they were to Abraham Lincoln, whose words still remind us that “...our fathers brought forth upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal....”

To understand what we have become, we must know what we have been. This volume illuminates the role of those who framed the Declaration of Independence and took the bold risk of putting their signatures to it, thus bringing into being a new Nation on a new model of stated principle. It will stimulate our visual memory of the persons and events that cast this Nation upon its course, and I commend it to all who would more fully appreciate that heritage.

To understand who we are today, we need to know who we were. This book highlights the people who created the Declaration of Independence and bravely signed it, leading to the birth of a new Nation based on new principles. It will refresh our memories of the individuals and events that set this Nation on its path, and I encourage everyone to read it to better appreciate that legacy.

Rogers C. B. Morton
Secretary of the Interior

Rogers C. B. Morton
Secretary of the Interior

viii

viii

It is my hope that this volume will not only increase popular knowledge of the Declaration of Independence and its signers, but that it will also undergird the efforts of historic preservationists to protect sites and buildings associated with them. Written records alone cannot convey the appreciation and understanding that come from personal acquaintance with historic places. Thus, while we preserve and study the documents of the American Revolution, we must also save and experience what physical evidences remain to illustrate the lives of those who so boldly brought it about. With the assistance of this book, many more Americans may come to know the sites and structures frequented by the signers of the Declaration, to visit them personally, and to appreciate more deeply the importance of their preservation.

It’s my hope that this book will not only boost public awareness of the Declaration of Independence and its signers, but also support the work of historic preservationists in protecting the sites and buildings connected to them. Written records alone can’t capture the appreciation and understanding that come from personally experiencing historic places. Therefore, while we preserve and study the documents of the American Revolution, we also need to save and experience the physical evidence that remains to showcase the lives of those who courageously made it happen. With the help of this book, many more Americans may get to know the sites and structures visited by the signers of the Declaration, visit them in person, and gain a deeper appreciation for the importance of their preservation.

Credit for the preparation of this volume is shared widely by persons both in and out of the National Park Service. The historic preservation activities of the Service have particularly benefited from the assistance of the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States, cosponsor of the National Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings. The Survey is authorized by the Historic Sites Act of 1935.

Credit for putting this volume together goes to many individuals, both within and outside the National Park Service. The Service's efforts in historic preservation have especially gained from the support of the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States, co-sponsor of the National Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings. The Survey is authorized by the Historic Sites Act of 1935.

Ronald H. Walker
Director
National Park Service

Ronald H. Walker
Director
National Park Service


ix

ix

Contents

Part I
Signers of the Declaration:
Historical Background
1
Part II
Signers of the Declaration:
Biographical Sketches
25
John Adams • Massachusetts 33
Samuel Adams • Massachusetts 36
Josiah Bartlett • New Hampshire 39
Carter Braxton • Virginia 41
Charles Carroll • Maryland 43
Samuel Chase • Maryland 45
Abraham Clark • New Jersey 47
George Clymer • Pennsylvania 49
William Ellery • Rhode Island 51
William Floyd • New York 53
Benjamin Franklin • Pennsylvania 55
Elbridge Gerry • Massachusetts 59
Button Gwinnett • Georgia 62
Lyman Hall • Georgia 65
John Hancock • Massachusetts 67
Benjamin Harrison • Virginia 70
John Hart • New Jersey 71
Joseph Hewes • North Carolina 73
Thomas Heyward, Jr. • South Carolina 75
William Hooper • North Carolina 77
Stephen Hopkins • Rhode Island 79
Francis Hopkinson • New Jersey 81
Samuel Huntington • Connecticut 83
Thomas Jefferson • Virginia 85x
Francis Lightfoot Lee • Virginia 90
Richard Henry Lee • Virginia 92
Francis Lewis • New York 94
Philip Livingston • New York 96
Thomas Lynch, Jr. • South Carolina 99
Thomas McKean • Delaware 100
Arthur Middleton • South Carolina 103
Lewis Morris • New York 104
Robert Morris • Pennsylvania 106
John Morton • Pennsylvania 109
Thomas Nelson, Jr. • Virginia 110
William Paca • Maryland 113
Robert Treat Paine • Massachusetts 115
John Penn • North Carolina 116
George Read • Delaware 118
Caesar Rodney • Delaware 120
George Ross • Pennsylvania 122
Benjamin Rush • Pennsylvania 123
Edward Rutledge • South Carolina 127
Roger Sherman • Connecticut 129
James Smith • Pennsylvania 132
Richard Stockton • New Jersey 133
Thomas Stone • Maryland 135
George Taylor • Pennsylvania 137
Matthew Thornton • New Hampshire 139
George Walton • Georgia 140
William Whipple • New Hampshire 142
William Williams • Connecticut 144
James Wilson • Pennsylvania 145
John Witherspoon • New Jersey 149
Oliver Wolcott • Connecticut 152
George Wythe • Virginia 154
Part III
Signers of the Declaration:
Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings
157
Huntington Birthplace, Conn. 164
Huntington House, Conn. 165
Williams Birthplace, Conn. 166xi
Williams House, Conn. 168
Wolcott House, Conn. 169
The White House, D.C. 170
College Hill, Ga. 173
Meadow Garden, Ga. 175
Tabby Cottage, Ga. 176
Whipple Birthplace, Maine 177
Carroll Mansion, Md. 179
Carrollton Manor, Md. 180
Chase-Lloyd House, Md. 181
Deshon-Caton-Carroll House, Md. 183
Doughoregan Manor, Md. 185
Habre-de-Venture, Md. 186
Paca House, Md. 188
Peggy Stewart House, Md. 189
Adams (John) Birthplace, Mass. 191
Adams (John Quincy) Birthplace, Mass. 192
Adams National Historic Site, Mass. 193
Elmwood, Mass. 195
Gerry Birthplace, Mass. 197
Hancock-Clarke House, Mass. 198
Bartlett House, N.H. 199
Moffatt-Ladd House, N.H. 201
Thornton House, N.H. 203
Hopkinson House, N.J. 204
Maybury Hill, N.J. 206
Morven, N.J. 207
President’s House, N.J. 208
Tusculum, N.J. 209
Floyd Birthplace (Fire Island National
Seashore), N.Y. 210
General Floyd House, N.Y. 212
Iredell House, N.C. 213
Nash-Hooper House, N.C. 214
Independence National Historical Park, Pa. 216
Parsons-Taylor House, Pa. 226
Shippen-Wistar House, Pa. 228
Summerseat, Pa. 229
Taylor House, Pa. 230xii
Governor Hopkins House, R.I. 231
Heyward-Washington House, S.C. 233
Hopsewee-on-the-Santee, S.C. 234
Middleton Place, S.C. 236
Rutledge House, S.C. 237
Berkeley, Va. 239
Elsing Green, Va. 240
Menokin, Va. 242
Monticello, Va. 243
Mount Airy, Va. 246
Nelson House (Colonial National
Historical Park), Va. 247
Poplar Forest, Va. 249
Stratford Hall, Va. 251
Tuckahoe, Va. 253
Wythe House, Va. 255
Appendix
The Declaration and Its History 257
Text of the Declaration 259
History of the Document 262
Suggested Reading 268
Criteria for Selection of Historic Sites of National Significance 270
Acknowledgments 272
Art and Picture Credits 274
Index 281
Map: Signers of the Declaration—Historic Sites of National Significance 162–163
All photographs are indexed.

1

1

Part One
Signers of the Declaration:
Historical Background

3

3

At Philadelphia in the summer of 1776, the Delegates to the Continental Congress courageously signed a document declaring the independence of the Thirteen American Colonies from Great Britain. Not only did the Declaration of Independence create a Nation, but it also pronounced timeless democratic principles. Enshrined today in the National Archives Building at Washington, D.C., it memorializes the founding of the United States and symbolizes the eternal freedom and dignity of Man.

In Philly during the summer of 1776, the delegates to the Continental Congress boldly signed a document that declared the independence of the Thirteen American Colonies from Great Britain. The Declaration of Independence not only established a nation but also articulated timeless democratic principles. Now preserved in the National Archives Building in Washington, D.C., it commemorates the founding of the United States and represents the enduring freedom and dignity of humanity.

* *Understood. Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.*Understood! Please provide the text you would like modernized.

By the time the Continental Congress adopted the Declaration in July 1776, the War for Independence had been underway for more than a year. Failing to obtain satisfactory redress from the mother country for their economic and political grievances during the previous decade, the colonists had finally resorted to armed conflict. These grievances had come to a head shortly after the French and Indian War (1754–63). Long and costly, the war depleted the royal treasury and added the financial burden of administering the vast territory acquired from France. Britain levied new, direct taxes in the Colonies and tightened customs controls.

By the time the Continental Congress adopted the Declaration in July 1776, the War for Independence had been going on for over a year. After not getting a satisfactory response from the mother country for their economic and political complaints over the previous decade, the colonists had finally taken up arms. These complaints reached a tipping point shortly after the French and Indian War (1754–63). The long and expensive war drained the royal treasury and increased the financial burden of governing the vast territory gained from France. Britain imposed new direct taxes in the colonies and tightened customs regulations.

The colonists, accustomed to considerable economic freedom, resented these measures. A number of Americans also felt that some4 sort of conspiracy existed in England to destroy their liberties and self-government. They believed that the mission of the large force of redcoats assigned to the Colonies actually was internal suppression rather than protection from a nonexistent external threat, especially since the French had been expelled. Particularly aggravating was the realization that the new tax levies supported the force. Some of the discontent was regional in nature. Indebtedness to British creditors irritated Southern planters. Commercial interests in the Middle Colonies disliked the prohibition on manufacturing certain products. Frontier settlers and speculators were irked at restrictions on westward expansion and the Indian trade.

The colonists, used to a lot of economic freedom, were upset about these measures. Many Americans also believed there was some kind of conspiracy in England to take away their liberties and self-governance. They thought the large number of redcoats sent to the Colonies was really meant to suppress them internally rather than protect them from a non-existent external threat, especially since the French had already been removed. What was particularly frustrating was realizing that the new taxes were funding that force. Some of the discontent was regional. Southern planters were annoyed by their debts to British creditors. Commercial interests in the Middle Colonies didn't like the ban on manufacturing certain goods. Frontier settlers and speculators were frustrated with restrictions on westward expansion and trade with Native Americans.

George III, King of England during the War for Independence, was the focus of colonial hatred.

5

5

The Revolutionaries utilized this exaggerated version of the Boston Massacre (1770) by Paul Revere to nourish resentment of British troops.

6

6

“The Bostonians Paying the Excise-Man or Tarring & Feathering,” a British cartoon satirizing colonial methods of protest.

In various places, peaceful protest and harassment of tax and customs collectors gave way to rioting and mob violence. In New York and Massachusetts, clashes with British troops culminated in bloodshed. Realizing that some of these disturbances stemmed from agitation in the colonial assemblies, which had enjoyed wide autonomy,7 the Crown tightened its control over them. Disputes between legislators and the King’s officials, once spasmodic, became commonplace. In some instances, notably in Virginia and Massachusetts, the Royal Governors dissolved the assemblies. In these and a few other provinces the Whigs separated from their Tory, or Loyalist, colleagues, met extralegally, and adopted retaliatory measures. Nearly all the Colonies formed special “committees of correspondence” to communicate with each other—the first step toward unified action.

In various places, peaceful demonstrations and harassment of tax and customs collectors turned into rioting and mob violence. In New York and Massachusetts, confrontations with British troops ended in bloodshed. Recognizing that some of these disturbances came from unrest in the colonial assemblies, which had enjoyed significant autonomy,7 the Crown increased its control over them. Disputes between legislators and the King’s officials, once irregular, became routine. In some cases, especially in Virginia and Massachusetts, the Royal Governors disbanded the assemblies. In these and a few other colonies, the Whigs split from their Tory, or Loyalist, colleagues, held meetings outside the law, and took retaliatory actions. Almost all the Colonies established specific “committees of correspondence” to communicate with each other—the first step toward unified action.

In retaliation for the Boston Tea Party (1773), the Crown imposed rigid limitations on the freedom of Massachusetts citizens.

In May 1774, in retaliation for the “Boston Tea Party,” Parliament closed the port of Boston and virtually abolished provincial self-government in Massachusetts. These actions stimulated resistance across the land. That summer, the Massachusetts lower house, through the committees of correspondence, secretly invited all 138 Colonies to attend a convention. In response, on the fifth of September, 55 Delegates representing 12 Colonies, Georgia excepted, assembled at Philadelphia. They convened at Carpenters’ Hall and organized the First Continental Congress.

In May 1774, in response to the “Boston Tea Party,” Parliament shut down the port of Boston and effectively eliminated self-government in Massachusetts. These actions sparked resistance throughout the country. That summer, the lower house in Massachusetts, through the committees of correspondence, secretly invited all 138 Colonies to attend a convention. In response, on September 5th, 55 delegates representing 12 Colonies, excluding Georgia, gathered in Philadelphia. They met at Carpenters’ Hall and formed the First Continental Congress.

A rare contemporary engraving of the British-American clash in 1775 at North Bridge, near Concord, Mass.

Sharing though they did common complaints against the Crown, the Delegates propounded a wide variety of political opinions. Most of them agreed that Parliament had no right to control the internal affairs of the Colonies. Moderates, stressing trade benefits with the mother country, believed Parliament should continue to regulate commerce. Others questioned the extent of its authority. A handful of Delegates felt the answer to the problem lay in parliamentary representation. Most suggested legislative autonomy for the Colonies. Reluctant to sever ties of blood, language, trade, and cultural heritage, none yet openly entertained the idea of complete independence from Great Britain.

Sharing their common grievances against the Crown, the Delegates put forward a wide range of political views. Most agreed that Parliament had no authority to control the internal matters of the Colonies. Moderates, emphasizing the trade benefits with the mother country, believed that Parliament should still regulate commerce. Others questioned how much power it really had. A few Delegates thought the solution lay in having representatives in Parliament. Most suggested that the Colonies should have their own legislative autonomy. Hesitant to break ties of family, language, trade, and cultural heritage, none were yet openly considering the idea of complete independence from Great Britain.

After weeks of debate and compromise, Congress adopted two significant measures. The first declared that the American colonists9 were entitled to the same rights as Englishmen everywhere and denounced any infringement of those rights. The second, the Continental Association, provided for an embargo on all trade with Britain. To enforce the embargo and punish violators, at the behest of Congress counties, cities, and towns formed councils, or committees, of safety—many of which later became wartime governing or administrative bodies. When Congress adjourned in late October, the Delegates resolved to reconvene in May 1775 if the Crown had not responded by then.

After weeks of discussion and compromise, Congress passed two important measures. The first stated that the American colonists were entitled to the same rights as Englishmen everywhere and condemned any violation of those rights. The second, the Continental Association, established an embargo on all trade with Britain. To enforce the embargo and penalize violators, at Congress's request, counties, cities, and towns formed councils, or committees, of safety—many of which later became wartime governing or administrative bodies. When Congress adjourned in late October, the Delegates agreed to meet again in May 1775 if the Crown had not responded by then.

Headlines of a broadside showing American alarm over the Battle of Concord. The two rows of coffins at the top represent slain militiamen.

In a sense the Continental Congress acted with restraint, for while it was in session the situation in Massachusetts verged on war. In September, just before Congress met, British troops from Boston had seized ordnance supplies at Charlestown and Cambridge and almost clashed with the local militia. The next month, Massachusetts patriots, openly defying royal authority, organized a Revolutionary provincial assembly as well as a military defense committee. Whigs in three other colonies—Maryland, Virginia, and New Hampshire—had earlier that year formed governments. By the end of the year, all the Colonies except Georgia and New York had either set up new ones or taken control of those already in existence. During the winter of 1774–75, while Parliament mulled over conciliatory measures, colonial militia units prepared for war.

In a way, the Continental Congress showed restraint because, while it was in session, the situation in Massachusetts was on the brink of war. In September, just before Congress convened, British troops from Boston had taken military supplies in Charlestown and Cambridge and nearly clashed with the local militia. The following month, Massachusetts patriots, openly challenging royal authority, set up a Revolutionary provincial assembly and a military defense committee. Whigs in three other colonies—Maryland, Virginia, and New Hampshire—had formed their own governments earlier that year. By the end of the year, all the colonies except Georgia and New York had either established new governments or taken control of the existing ones. During the winter of 1774–75, while Parliament considered conciliatory measures, colonial militia units were preparing for war.

10

10

Continental Army recruiting poster.

The crisis came in the spring of 1775, predictably in Massachusetts. Late on the night of April 18 the Royal Governor, Gen. Thomas Gage, alarmed at the militancy of the rebels, dispatched 600 troops from Boston to seize a major supply depot at Concord. Almost simultaneously the Boston council of safety, aware of Gage’s intentions, directed Paul Revere and William Dawes to ride ahead to warn militia units and citizens along the way of the British approach, as well as John Hancock and Samuel Adams, who were staying at nearby Lexington. Forewarned, the two men went into hiding.

The crisis hit in the spring of 1775, predictably in Massachusetts. Late on the night of April 18, Royal Governor Gen. Thomas Gage, worried about the rebels' increasing aggression, sent 600 troops from Boston to capture a major supply depot in Concord. Almost at the same time, the Boston council of safety, aware of Gage’s plans, ordered Paul Revere and William Dawes to ride ahead to alert militia units and citizens along the route about the British advance, as well as John Hancock and Samuel Adams, who were staying nearby in Lexington. Forewarned, the two men went into hiding.

11

11

Title page of Common Sense, the anonymously written and widely distributed pamphlet that converted thousands of colonists to the Revolutionary cause.

12 About 77 militiamen confronted the redcoats when they plodded into Lexington at dawn. After some tense moments, as the sorely outnumbered colonials were dispersing, blood was shed. More flowed at Concord and much more along the route of the British as they retreated to Boston, harassed most of the way by an aroused citizenry. What had once been merely protest had evolved into open warfare; the War for Independence had begun.

12 About 77 militiamen faced off against the redcoats when they marched into Lexington at dawn. After some tense moments, as the outnumbered colonials were scattering, blood was spilled. More spilled in Concord and even more along the route of the British as they retreated to Boston, harassed most of the way by an angry citizenry. What had once been just a protest had turned into open warfare; the War for Independence had started.

Thomas Paine, author of Common Sense, did not emigrate to America from England until 1774, but he became an ardent patriot.

13

13

Sir William Howe, British commander in chief in America from 1776 until 1778.

14 The Second Continental Congress convened in the Pennsylvania State House at Philadelphia on May 10, 1775. Burdened by wartime realities and the need to prepare a unified defense, it created a Continental Army, unanimously elected George Washington as commander in chief, appointed other generals, and tackled problems of military finance and supply. Yet, despite these warlike actions, many Delegates still hoped for a peaceful reconciliation.

14 The Second Continental Congress met in the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia on May 10, 1775. Confronted with the realities of war and the necessity for a coordinated defense, it established a Continental Army, unanimously chose George Washington as the commander in chief, appointed additional generals, and addressed issues related to military finance and supplies. However, despite these aggressive measures, many delegates still held out hope for a peaceful resolution.

Robert R. Livingston of New York, the most conservative member of the drafting committee, neither voted on independence nor signed the Declaration.

In July Congress adopted the Olive Branch Petition, a final attempt to achieve an understanding with the Crown. The petition appealed directly to King George III to cease hostilities and restore harmony. But, unwilling to challenge the supremacy of Parliament, he refused to acknowledge the plea and proclaimed the Colonies to be in a state of rebellion.

In July, Congress adopted the Olive Branch Petition, a last effort to reach an agreement with the Crown. The petition appealed directly to King George III to stop the fighting and bring back peace. However, unwilling to challenge Parliament's authority, he refused to acknowledge the request and declared the Colonies to be in a state of rebellion.

15 During the winter of 1775–76, as the war intensified, all chance for accommodation vanished. Congress, for the first time representing all Thirteen Colonies because Georgia had sent Delegates in the fall, disclaimed allegiance to Parliament, created a navy, and appointed a committee of foreign affairs. Nevertheless the patriots, despite their mounting influence in the provincial assemblies, felt they needed more public support and hesitated to urge a final break with the Crown.

15 During the winter of 1775–76, as the war heated up, all hope for compromise disappeared. Congress, now representing all Thirteen Colonies because Georgia had sent Delegates in the fall, denied loyalty to Parliament, established a navy, and set up a committee for foreign affairs. Still, the patriots, despite their growing influence in the provincial assemblies, felt they needed more public backing and were reluctant to push for a complete split from the Crown.

The turning point came in January 1776 with publication in Philadelphia of the pamphlet Common Sense, authored anonymously by the recent English immigrant Thomas Paine. Attacking the “myth” of an evil Parliament and a benevolent King, he denounced George III for creating the Colonies’ miseries, condemned the British constitution as well as monarchy in general, and exhorted his fellow Americans to declare independence immediately. The pamphlet, widely reprinted, was purchased by many thousands of people and read by thousands more. It created a furor. From Georgia to New Hampshire, independence became the major topic of discussion and debate. The Revolutionaries won thousands of converts.

The turning point came in January 1776 with the publication in Philadelphia of the pamphlet Common Sense, written anonymously by the recent English immigrant Thomas Paine. He criticized the “myth” of an evil Parliament and a caring King, condemned George III for the suffering of the Colonies, rejected the British constitution and monarchy as a whole, and urged his fellow Americans to declare independence right away. The pamphlet, widely reprinted, was bought by many thousands of people and read by even more. It sparked a huge reaction. From Georgia to New Hampshire, independence became the main topic of conversation and debate. The Revolutionaries gained many new supporters.

In May Congress took a bold step toward political freedom by authorizing the Colonies to form permanent governments. Those that had not done so began to oust Crown officials and draft constitutions. Independence, though not yet officially declared, was for all practical purposes a reality.

In May, Congress made a significant move toward political freedom by allowing the Colonies to establish permanent governments. Those that hadn’t already done this began to remove Crown officials and create constitutions. Independence, while not yet officially declared, was essentially a reality.

* Understood! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.Understood. Please provide the text to be modernized.Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Sure! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.

The official movement for independence took root in the provincial assemblies. The North Carolina assembly in April 1776 instructed its congressional Delegates to vote for the issue should it be proposed. The next month, on May 4, Rhode Island announced its independence publicly—the first colony to do so. But it was Virginia that prodded Congress to action. On May 15 a Williamsburg convention declared Virginia independent and authorized its delegation at Philadelphia to propose a similar course for the Colonies. On June 7 the delegation’s leader, Richard Henry Lee, introduced the following resolution:

The official movement for independence began in the provincial assemblies. In April 1776, the North Carolina assembly instructed its congressional delegates to vote for independence if it came up for discussion. The following month, on May 4, Rhode Island publicly declared its independence—the first colony to do so. However, it was Virginia that pushed Congress to take action. On May 15, a convention in Williamsburg declared Virginia independent and authorized its delegation in Philadelphia to propose the same for the Colonies. On June 7, the leader of the delegation, Richard Henry Lee, introduced the following resolution:

That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.

That these United Colonies are, and should be, free and independent states, no longer loyal to the British Crown, and that all political connections between them and Great Britain are, and should be, entirely severed.

16 The resolution also incorporated proposals to form foreign alliances; and to devise a plan for confederation, which would be submitted to the Colonies for their approval.

16 The resolution also included suggestions to create foreign alliances and to come up with a plan for confederation, which would be presented to the Colonies for their approval.

Despite the enthusiastic response of many Delegates, some of them, though they foresaw the inevitability of independence, objected to the timing. They believed the decision should reflect the desires of the people as expressed through the provincial assemblies and pointed out that the Middle Colonies, not yet ripe for freedom, needed more time for deliberation. On June 10 the moderates obtained a postponement of consideration of the Lee resolution until July 1.

Despite the enthusiastic response from many delegates, some of them, while acknowledging that independence was inevitable, had concerns about the timing. They felt that the decision should align with the wishes of the people as expressed through the provincial assemblies and noted that the Middle Colonies, which were not ready for freedom yet, required more time for discussion. On June 10, the moderates managed to delay the consideration of the Lee resolution until July 1.

On June 11 the Revolutionaries, undaunted by the delay and convinced of their ultimate victory, persuaded Congress to appoint a committee to draft a declaration of independence. Three of its five members, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson, were Revolutionaries. Roger Sherman disliked extremism but had recently backed the independence movement. The most unlikely member, Robert R. Livingston, had stood in the front ranks of opposition to Lee’s resolution. Possibly he was appointed to exert a moderating effect on its supporters or, conversely, in the hope that his membership would help swing over the conservative New York delegation.

On June 11, the Revolutionaries, undeterred by the delay and sure of their eventual success, convinced Congress to set up a committee to write a declaration of independence. Three of the five members, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson, were Revolutionaries. Roger Sherman wasn't a fan of extremism but had recently supported the independence movement. The least likely member, Robert R. Livingston, had previously opposed Lee’s resolution. He might have been appointed to help moderate the supporters or, on the flip side, to encourage the more conservative New York delegation to join in.

At the time Lee had introduced his resolution, seven of the Colonies—New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Virginia, North Carolina, and Georgia—favored independence. New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, South Carolina, and Maryland were either opposed or undecided. Throughout the month, Revolutionaries in those provinces labored to gain control of the assemblies. Delaware and Pennsylvania, unable to reach a decision, instructed their representatives to vote in their colonies’ “best interests.” New Jersey issued similar directions, but also elected an entirely new and Whig-oriented slate of Delegates. The Maryland assembly, largely through the persuasion of Samuel Chase, Charles Carroll of Carrollton, and William Paca, voted unanimously for independence and so charged its Delegates. The South Carolinians, though they had been authorized months before to cast their lot with the majority, vacillated. The New Yorkers impatiently awaited instructions.

At the time Lee introduced his resolution, seven of the Colonies—New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Virginia, North Carolina, and Georgia—supported independence. New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, South Carolina, and Maryland were either against it or undecided. Throughout the month, Revolutionaries in those areas worked to gain control of the assemblies. Delaware and Pennsylvania, unable to make a decision, instructed their representatives to vote in their colonies’ “best interests.” New Jersey gave similar orders but also elected an entirely new slate of Delegates who were aligned with the Whigs. The Maryland assembly, largely due to the influence of Samuel Chase, Charles Carroll of Carrollton, and William Paca, voted unanimously for independence and instructed its Delegates accordingly. The South Carolinians, though they had been authorized months earlier to join the majority, hesitated. The New Yorkers impatiently waited for instructions.

17

17

First page of Jefferson’s rough draft of the Declaration.

18 July 1 was the day of decision. The Revolutionaries, overconfident from their progress of the preceding month, anticipated an almost unanimous vote for independence. They were disappointed. Following congressional procedure, each colony balloted as a unit, determined by the majority of Delegate opinion. Only nine of the Colonies voted affirmatively; Pennsylvania and South Carolina, negatively; New York abstained; and the two Delegates present from Delaware deadlocked. Technically the resolution had carried, but the solidarity desirable for such a vital decision was missing. Edward Rutledge of South Carolina, hinting his colony might change sides, moved that the vote be retaken the next day.

18 July 1 was the day of decision. The Revolutionaries, feeling overly confident from their progress the previous month, expected almost everyone to vote for independence. They were let down. Following congressional rules, each colony voted as a unit, based on the majority opinion of the Delegates. Only nine of the Colonies voted in favor; Pennsylvania and South Carolina voted against it; New York abstained; and the two Delegates from Delaware were split. Technically, the resolution had passed, but the unity needed for such an important decision was lacking. Edward Rutledge from South Carolina, suggesting that his colony might change its position, proposed that the vote be taken again the next day.

That day proved to be one of the most dramatic in the history of the Continental Congress. John Adams of Massachusetts exerted an overwhelming influence. South Carolina, its Delegates swayed by Rutledge, reversed its position. Two conservatives among the seven Pennsylvanians, Robert Morris and John Dickinson, though unwilling to make a personal commitment to independence, cooperated by purposely absenting themselves; the remaining Delegates voted three to two in favor. The most exciting moment of the day occurred when Caesar Rodney, Delaware’s third Delegate, galloped up to the statehouse after a harrowing 80-mile night ride from Dover through a thunderstorm and broke the Delaware tie. Home on a military assignment, the evening before he had received an urgent plea from Thomas McKean, the Delawarean who had voted for independence, to rush to Philadelphia. In the final vote, 12 Colonies approved Lee’s resolution, New York again abstaining. Congress declared the resolution to be in effect.

That day turned out to be one of the most dramatic in the history of the Continental Congress. John Adams from Massachusetts had a huge influence. South Carolina, persuaded by Rutledge, changed its stance. Two conservatives among the seven Pennsylvanians, Robert Morris and John Dickinson, although not willing to personally commit to independence, intentionally stayed away; the remaining Delegates voted three to two in favor. The most thrilling moment of the day happened when Caesar Rodney, Delaware’s third Delegate, rode up to the statehouse after a grueling 80-mile night ride from Dover during a thunderstorm and broke the tie for Delaware. The night before, while on a military assignment, he received an urgent request from Thomas McKean, the Delawarean who had voted for independence, to hurry to Philadelphia. In the final vote, 12 Colonies supported Lee’s resolution, with New York abstaining once again. Congress declared the resolution to be in effect.

* Understood. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Sure! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.

For the remainder of July 2 and continuing until the 4th, Congress weighed and debated the content of the Declaration of Independence, which the drafting committee had submitted on June 28. Its author was young Thomas Jefferson, who had been in Congress about a year. The committee had chosen him for the task because he was from Virginia, the colony responsible for the independence resolution, and because of his reputation as an excellent writer and man of talent and action.

For the rest of July 2 and continuing until the 4th, Congress discussed and debated the content of the Declaration of Independence, which the drafting committee had submitted on June 28. Its author was young Thomas Jefferson, who had been in Congress for about a year. The committee selected him for the task because he was from Virginia, the colony that proposed the independence resolution, and because of his reputation as an outstanding writer and a talented, proactive individual.

19

19

Facsimile of the Declaration of Independence, engraved in 1823 while the document was still in relatively good condition.

20 Laboring in his rented rooms on the second floor of a private home at the corner of Seventh and Market Streets, Jefferson had completed a rough draft in about 2 weeks. Apparently Franklin and Adams made some minor changes, and Livingston and Sherman expressed no reservations so far as is known. To Jefferson’s irritation, however, Congress altered the final draft considerably. Most of the changes consisted of refinements in phraseology. Two major passages, however, were deleted. The first, a censure of the people of Great Britain, seemed harsh and needless to most of the Delegates. The second, an impassioned condemnation of the slave trade, offended Southern planters as well as New England shippers, many of whom were as culpable as the British in the trade.

20 Working in his rented rooms on the second floor of a private home at the corner of Seventh and Market Streets, Jefferson finished a rough draft in about two weeks. Apparently, Franklin and Adams made some minor tweaks, and Livingston and Sherman had no objections as far as we know. To Jefferson’s frustration, however, Congress made significant changes to the final draft. Most of the modifications involved refining the wording. However, two major sections were removed. The first was a criticism of the people of Great Britain, which seemed harsh and unnecessary to most of the Delegates. The second was a passionate denunciation of the slave trade, which upset Southern planters and New England merchants alike, many of whom were just as guilty as the British in the trade.

* Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Understood. Please provide the short phrases you would like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.Sure! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.

The first official document of the American Republic and one of the most influential in human history, the Declaration expressed the spirit of human freedom and affirmed Man’s universal rights. Jefferson’s goal in drafting it was not, he said, to invent “new ideas” but to compose “an expression of the American mind” in a tone and spirit suitable for the momentous occasion. Stylistically, the Declaration resembled his own preamble to the Virginia constitution and contained an almost identical list of grievances. Its political philosophy, reflecting the Lockean concepts espoused by many intellectuals of the day, was certainly not new. Jefferson himself had touched on the basic points in previous writings, and in essence he echoed George Mason’s “Declaration of Rights,” which some of the Philadelphia newspapers had published early in June. In other words, the Declaration assimilated existing concepts into a concise statement of national doctrine.

The first official document of the American Republic and one of the most influential in human history, the Declaration expressed the spirit of human freedom and affirmed people’s universal rights. Jefferson's goal in writing it was not, he claimed, to create “new ideas” but to craft “an expression of the American mind” in a tone and spirit suitable for the significant occasion. Stylistically, the Declaration resembled his own preamble to the Virginia constitution and included an almost identical list of grievances. Its political philosophy, reflecting the Lockean ideas supported by many thinkers of the time, was definitely not new. Jefferson himself had addressed the main points in earlier writings, and essentially he echoed George Mason's “Declaration of Rights,” which some of the Philadelphia newspapers had published early in June. In other words, the Declaration combined existing concepts into a concise statement of national doctrine.

Jefferson began the preamble with the oft-quoted and stirring words, “When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another....” He then listed a series of “self-evident” truths—that “all men are created equal” and that they are “endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights,” particularly “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Governments, “deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” are instituted by men to insure these rights. When they fail to do so, it is the “right of the people to alter or to abolish” them and to institute new governments. Men should not carelessly change governments, but should only take such action after a long series of abuses and usurpations lead to “absolute despotism.” Then it becomes their duty to do so. The longest portion of the Declaration is a list of colonial grievances and examples of the King’s tyranny. The final section includes a restatement of Lee’s resolution and a pledge by the signers of their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to the cause of independence.

Jefferson started the preamble with the famous and powerful words, “When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another....” He then outlined a series of “self-evident” truths—that “all men are created equal” and that they are “endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights,” especially “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Governments, “deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” are established by people to protect these rights. When they do not, it is the “right of the people to alter or to abolish” them and create new governments. People should not change governments lightly, but only after a long series of abuses and usurpations lead to “absolute despotism.” At that point, it is their duty to act. The longest part of the Declaration is a list of colonial complaints and examples of the King’s tyranny. The final section includes a restatement of Lee’s resolution and a commitment by the signers of their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to the cause of independence.

21

21

The Declaration first appeared in newspapers on July 9, the day after the official announcement in Philadelphia.

22

22

The New York City Sons of Liberty celebrated independence by pulling down a statue of George III, which they later melted and molded into bullets.
* Sure! Please provide the text you want me to modernize.Understood. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the text for modernization.Understood. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.

On July 4 all the Colonies except New York voted to adopt the Declaration. Congress ordered it printed and distributed to colonial officials, military units, and the press. John Hancock and Charles Thomson, President and Secretary of Congress respectively, were the only signers of this broadside copy. On July 8, outside the Pennsylvania State House, the document was first read to the public. During the ensuing celebration, people cheered, bells rang out, and soldiers paraded. At other cities, similar celebrations soon took place. Yet many citizens—the Loyalists, or Tories—could not accept independence now that it had been declared any more than previously when23 it had been merely a concept. Some of them would continue to dream of reconciliation. Others would flee from or be driven out of the country. In addition, another sizable group of citizens remained noncommittal, neither supporting nor opposing independence.

On July 4, all the Colonies except New York voted to adopt the Declaration. Congress ordered it to be printed and distributed to colonial officials, military units, and the press. John Hancock and Charles Thomson, the President and Secretary of Congress respectively, were the only signers of this broadside copy. On July 8, outside the Pennsylvania State House, the document was first read to the public. During the celebration that followed, people cheered, bells rang out, and soldiers paraded. In other cities, similar celebrations soon took place. However, many citizens—the Loyalists, or Tories—could not accept independence now that it had been declared any more than they could when it was just an idea. Some of them continued to hope for reconciliation. Others would flee or be driven out of the country. Additionally, another sizable group of citizens remained neutral, neither supporting nor opposing independence.

Artist’s rendition of the Battle of Germantown (October 1777).

Four days after obtaining New York’s approval of the Declaration on July 15, Congress ordered it engrossed on parchment for signature. At this time, indicative of unanimity, the title was changed from “A Declaration by the Representatives of the United States of America in General Congress Assembled” to “The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America.”

Four days after getting New York's approval of the Declaration on July 15, Congress ordered it to be written out on parchment for signatures. At this point, to show unity, the title was changed from “A Declaration by the Representatives of the United States of America in General Congress Assembled” to “The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America.”

* I’m ready to assist you! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Sure! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.Sure! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.Sure, please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.

Contrary to a widespread misconception, the 56 signers did not sign as a group and did not do so on July 4, 1776. The official event occurred on August 2, 1776, when 50 men probably took part. Later that year, five more apparently signed separately and one added his name in a subsequent year. Not until January 18, 1777, in the wake of Washington’s victories at Trenton and Princeton, did Congress,24 which had sought to protect the signers from British retaliation for as long as possible, authorize printing of the Declaration with all their names listed. At this time, Thomas McKean had not yet penned his name.

Contrary to a common belief, the 56 signers didn’t sign as a group and didn’t do it on July 4, 1776. The official event took place on August 2, 1776, when around 50 men likely participated. Later that year, five more apparently signed separately, and one added his name in a later year. It wasn’t until January 18, 1777, after Washington’s victories at Trenton and Princeton, that Congress,24 which had tried to keep the signers safe from British retaliation for as long as possible, authorized the printing of the Declaration with all their names included. At that point, Thomas McKean had not yet signed his name.

The most impressive signature is that of John Hancock, President of Congress, centered over the others. According to tradition, Hancock wrote boldly and defiantly so that King George III would not need spectacles to identify him as a “traitor” and double the reward for his head. The other Delegates signed in six columns, which ran from right to left. They utilized the standard congressional voting order, by colony generally from north to south: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.

The most striking signature is John Hancock's, President of Congress, prominently placed above the others. Legend has it that Hancock wrote it large and boldly so King George III wouldn't need glasses to see him labeled as a “traitor” and increase the bounty on his head. The other delegates signed in six columns, arranged from right to left. They followed the usual congressional voting order by colony, generally from north to south: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.

Those who signed on August 2 undoubtedly did not realize that others would follow them and thus allowed no room to accommodate the signatures of the later six men. Two of them, George Wythe and Richard Henry Lee, found ample room above their fellow Virginians. One, Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, crowded his name into the space between the Massachusetts and Rhode Island groups. Two of the others—Thomas McKean and Oliver Wolcott—signed at the bottom of columns following their State delegations. Only Matthew Thornton of New Hampshire needed to add his name separately from his colleagues—at the bottom of the first column on the right at the end of the Connecticut group.

Those who signed on August 2 probably didn't realize that others would join them later, which left no space for the signatures of the six men who followed. George Wythe and Richard Henry Lee found enough room above their fellow Virginians. Elbridge Gerry from Massachusetts squeezed his name into the space between the Massachusetts and Rhode Island groups. Two others—Thomas McKean and Oliver Wolcott—signed at the bottom of the columns after their state delegations. Only Matthew Thornton from New Hampshire had to add his name separately from his colleagues—at the bottom of the first column on the right, at the end of the Connecticut group.

* *Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Sure! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.

Independence had been declared; it still had to be won on the field of battle. The War for Independence was already underway, but 5 more years of struggle and bloody campaigning lay ahead. In 1781 the Colonies achieved military victory, and 2 years later Britain in the Treaty of Paris officially recognized the independence they had proclaimed in 1776. The building of the Nation could begin.

Independence had been declared; it still needed to be fought for on the battlefield. The War for Independence was already in progress, but 5 more years of struggle and fierce fighting were ahead. In 1781, the Colonies secured military victory, and 2 years later, Britain officially recognized the independence they had announced in 1776 with the Treaty of Paris. The construction of the Nation could begin.


25

25

Part Two
Signers of the Declaration:
Bio Sketches

27

27

Liberally endowed as a whole with courage and sense of purpose, the signers consisted of a distinguished group of individuals. Although heterogeneous in background, education, experience, and accomplishments, at the time of the signing they were practically all men of means and represented an elite cross section of 18th-century American leadership. Every one of them had achieved prominence in his colony, but only a few enjoyed a national reputation.

Well-endowed as a whole with bravery and a clear sense of purpose, the signers were a notable group of individuals. Despite their differences in background, education, experience, and achievements, at the time of the signing, they were mostly wealthy men representing a top tier of 18th-century American leadership. Each of them had become prominent in his colony, but only a handful had gained national recognition.

The signers were those individuals who happened to be Delegates to Congress at the time. Such men of stature in the Nation as George Washington and Patrick Henry were not then even serving in the body. On the other hand, Jefferson, the two Adamses, Richard Henry Lee, and Benjamin Rush ranked among the outstanding people in the Colonies; and Franklin had already acquired international fame. Some of the signers had not taken a stand for or against independence in the final vote on July 2. For example, Robert Morris of Pennsylvania had purposely absented himself. Others had not yet been elected to Congress or were away on business or military matters. Some were last-minute replacements for opponents of independence. The only signer who actually voted negatively on July 2 was George Read of Delaware.

The signers were the individuals who happened to be delegates to Congress at the time. Prominent figures in the nation like George Washington and Patrick Henry were not serving in Congress then. However, Jefferson, the two Adamses, Richard Henry Lee, and Benjamin Rush were among the most notable people in the colonies, and Franklin had already gained international fame. Some of the signers hadn’t taken a clear position for or against independence during the final vote on July 2. For instance, Robert Morris from Pennsylvania intentionally stayed away. Others hadn’t yet been elected to Congress or were absent due to business or military obligations. Some were last-minute substitutes for those opposed to independence. The only signer who actually voted against it on July 2 was George Read from Delaware.

* Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the text that you'd like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Sure! Please provide the text you'd like to have modernized.

The signers possessed many basic similarities. Most were American-born and of Anglo-Saxon origin. The eight foreign-born—Button28 Gwinnett, Francis Lewis, Robert Morris, James Smith, George Taylor, Matthew Thornton, James Wilson, and John Witherspoon—were all natives of the British Isles. Except for Charles Carroll, a Roman Catholic, and a few Deists, every one subscribed to Protestantism. For the most part basically political nonextremists, many at first had hesitated at separation let alone rebellion. A few signed only reluctantly.

The signers had a lot in common. Most were born in America and were of Anglo-Saxon descent. The eight who were born abroad—Button Gwinnett, Francis Lewis, Robert Morris, James Smith, George Taylor, Matthew Thornton, James Wilson, and John Witherspoon—were all from the British Isles. With the exception of Charles Carroll, a Roman Catholic, and a few Deists, everyone else was Protestant. Generally, they were political moderates, and many hesitated about the idea of separation, not to mention rebellion. A few signed only with reluctance.

Fervid Revolutionary Patrick Henry numbered among those patriots of national reputation who were not Members of Congress at the time of the signing of the Declaration.

The majority were well educated and prosperous. More than half the southerners belonged to the planter class and owned slaves, though Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, and others heartily opposed the institution of slavery, as did also several of the signers from the North. On the other hand, William Whipple, as a sea captain early in his career, had likely sometimes carried slaves on his ship.

The majority were well-educated and doing well financially. More than half of the southerners were part of the planter class and owned slaves, although Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, and others strongly opposed slavery, as did several signers from the North. On the other hand, William Whipple, who was a sea captain early in his career, probably sometimes transported slaves on his ship.

Although the signers ranged in age at the time from 26 (Edward Rutledge) to 70 (Benjamin Franklin), the bulk of them were in their thirties or forties. Probably as a result of their favored economic29 position, an amazingly large number attained an age that far exceeded the life expectancy of their time; 38 of the 56 lived into their sixties or beyond and 14 into the eighties and nineties.

Although the signers were aged between 26 (Edward Rutledge) and 70 (Benjamin Franklin) at the time, most of them were in their thirties or forties. Likely due to their favorable economic position, an impressively large number lived well beyond the average life expectancy of their era; 38 out of the 56 lived into their sixties or older, and 14 reached their eighties and nineties.29

George Washington inspecting his troops at Valley Forge. Busy serving as commander in chief of the Continental Army, he did not sign the Declaration.

With few exceptions, those who subscribed to the Declaration continued in public service under the new Federal and State Governments. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson became President; they and Elbridge Gerry, Vice President. Samuel Chase and James Wilson won appointment to the Supreme Court. Others served as Congressmen, diplomats, Governors, and judges. Six of the signers—George Clymer, Benjamin Franklin, Robert Morris, George Read, Roger Sherman, and James Wilson—also signed the Constitution. Sixteen of them underwrote the Articles of Confederation. Only two, Roger Sherman and Robert Morris, affixed their signatures to the Declaration, Constitution, and Articles.

With few exceptions, those who signed the Declaration continued to serve in public office under the new Federal and State Governments. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson became President, with Elbridge Gerry as Vice President. Samuel Chase and James Wilson were appointed to the Supreme Court. Others took roles as Congressmen, diplomats, Governors, and judges. Six of the signers—George Clymer, Benjamin Franklin, Robert Morris, George Read, Roger Sherman, and James Wilson—also signed the Constitution. Sixteen of them supported the Articles of Confederation. Only two, Roger Sherman and Robert Morris, signed the Declaration, Constitution, and Articles.

Caesar Rodney and Joseph Hewes were the only bachelors in the group. All but five fathered children. Carter Braxton sired no fewer than 18, but 10 others each had at least 10 offspring. The average30 number was about six. Some of the sons of the signers attained national distinction. John Adams’ son John Quincy became President; the son of Benjamin Harrison, William Henry, won the same office, as did also Benjamin’s great-grandson with the same name. Other male progeny of the signers served as U.S. Congressmen, Governors, and State legislators.

Caesar Rodney and Joseph Hewes were the only single men in the group. All but five had children. Carter Braxton had no fewer than 18 kids, while 10 others each had at least 10 children. The average30 number was about six. Some of the sons of the signers achieved national recognition. John Adams’ son John Quincy became President; Benjamin Harrison's son, William Henry, held the same office, as did Benjamin’s great-grandson with the same name. Other male descendants of the signers served as U.S. Congressmen, Governors, and State legislators.

* Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.

Yet the group manifested diversity. Each man tended to reflect the particular attitudes and interests of his own region and colony. Fourteen represented New England; 21, the Middle Colonies; and 21, the South. The largest number, nine, came from Pennsylvania; the least, two, from Rhode Island. All those from three Colonies (Georgia, New Hampshire, and North Carolina) were born elsewhere. About half of the men received their higher education in colonial colleges or abroad; most of the others studied at home, in local schools or private academies, or with tutors. A few were almost entirely self-taught.

Yet the group showed a lot of diversity. Each person tended to reflect the specific attitudes and interests of their own region and colony. Fourteen represented New England; 21 came from the Middle Colonies; and 21 from the South. The largest number, nine, was from Pennsylvania; the smallest, two, was from Rhode Island. All the individuals from three colonies (Georgia, New Hampshire, and North Carolina) were born in other places. About half of the men got their higher education in colonial colleges or overseas; most of the others studied at home, in local schools or private academies, or with tutors. A few were almost completely self-taught.

Harvard College, about 1725. Indicative of the favored economic circumstances of the signers, about half of them enjoyed a higher education. Eight, including all five from Massachusetts, attended Harvard.

31 In wealth, the signers ranged from Charles Carroll, one of the wealthiest men in the Colonies, to Samuel Adams, whose friends supplied money and clothes so he could attend Congress. About one-third were born into wealth; most of the others acquired it on their own. Some were self-made men. A few were of humble origin; one, George Taylor, had come to America as an indentured servant.

31 In terms of wealth, the signers varied from Charles Carroll, one of the richest men in the Colonies, to Samuel Adams, who relied on his friends for financial support and clothing to attend Congress. About a third were born into wealth, while most others earned it themselves. Some were self-made individuals. A few came from modest beginnings; one, George Taylor, arrived in America as an indentured servant.

Many pursued more than one vocation. More than half were trained in the law, but not all of them practiced it. Some won a livelihood as merchants and shippers. Roughly a quarter of the group earned their living from agriculture, usually as wealthy planters or landed gentry, but just a few could be called farmers. Four—Josiah Bartlett, Benjamin Rush, Lyman Hall, and Matthew Thornton—were doctors. Oliver Wolcott also studied medicine for awhile, but never entered the profession. George Taylor’s occupation was ironmaster. Of the four trained as ministers—Lyman Hall, William Hooper, Robert Treat Paine, and John Witherspoon—only the latter made it his lifetime vocation. William Williams received some theological training. Samuel Adams followed no real occupation other than politics.

Many people had more than one job. More than half were trained in law, but not all of them practiced it. Some made a living as merchants and shippers. About a quarter of the group earned their income from farming, usually as wealthy plantation owners or land gentry, but very few could be considered farmers. Four—Josiah Bartlett, Benjamin Rush, Lyman Hall, and Matthew Thornton—were doctors. Oliver Wolcott also studied medicine for a while but never became a doctor. George Taylor worked as an ironmaster. Of the four trained as ministers—Lyman Hall, William Hooper, Robert Treat Paine, and John Witherspoon—only John Witherspoon made it his lifelong career. William Williams received some theological training. Samuel Adams didn't really have any job other than politics.

* Understood. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Understood. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Got it! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Sure! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.

For their dedication to the cause of independence, the signers risked loss of fortune, imprisonment, and death for treason. Although none died directly at the hands of the British, the wife of one, Mrs. Francis Lewis, succumbed as a result of harsh prison treatment. About one-third of the group served as militia officers, most seeing wartime action. Four of these men (Thomas Heyward, Jr., Arthur Middleton, Edward Rutledge, and George Walton), as well as Richard Stockton, were taken captive. The homes of nearly one-third of the signers were destroyed or damaged, and the families of a few were scattered when the British pillaged or confiscated their estates.

For their commitment to independence, the signers risked losing their wealth, imprisonment, and death for treason. Although none were executed directly by the British, the wife of one, Mrs. Francis Lewis, died due to brutal prison conditions. About a third of the group served as militia officers, with most seeing combat during the war. Four of these men (Thomas Heyward, Jr., Arthur Middleton, Edward Rutledge, and George Walton), along with Richard Stockton, were captured. Nearly a third of the signers had their homes destroyed or damaged, and the families of some were scattered when the British looted or seized their estates.

Nearly all of the group emerged poorer for their years of public service and neglect of personal affairs. Although a couple of the merchants and shippers among them profited from the war, the businesses of most of them deteriorated as a result of embargoes on trade with Britain and heavy financial losses when their ships were confiscated or destroyed at sea. Several forfeited to the Government precious specie for virtually worthless Continental currency or made donations or loans, usually unrepaid, to their colonies or the Government. Some even sold their personal property to help finance the war.

Nearly all of the group ended up worse off after their years of public service and neglecting their personal affairs. While a few merchants and shippers benefited from the war, most saw their businesses suffer due to trade embargoes with Britain and significant financial losses when their ships were seized or destroyed at sea. Several lost valuable gold and silver to the government in exchange for practically worthless Continental currency, or made donations or loans—often without repayment—to their colonies or the government. Some even sold their personal property to help fund the war.

32 Certainly most of the signers had little or nothing to gain materially and practically all to lose when they subscribed to the Declaration of Independence. By doing so, they earned a niche of honor in the annals of the United States. Whatever other heights they reached or whatever else they contributed to history, the act of signing insured them immortality.

32 Most of the signers had little to gain for themselves and just about everything to lose when they approved the Declaration of Independence. In doing so, they secured a place of honor in the history of the United States. No matter what other achievements they had or contributions they made to history, the act of signing guaranteed them a lasting legacy.

* Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the short text for me to modernize.Sure, please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.

The following biographical sketches are arranged alphabetically by last name. Readers interested in signers for a certain State should consult the Index under the appropriate State.

The biographical sketches below are listed alphabetically by last name. If you're looking for signers from a specific State, please check the Index under that State.


33

33

John Adams

MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS

Few men contributed more to U.S. Independence than John Adams, the “Atlas of American Independence” in the eyes of fellow signer Richard Stockton. A giant among the Founding Fathers, Adams was one of the coterie of leaders who generated the American Revolution, for which his prolific writings provided many of the politico-philosophical foundations. Not only did he help draft the Declaration, but he also steered it through the Continental Congress.

Few individuals played a bigger role in U.S. Independence than John Adams, referred to as the “Atlas of American Independence” by fellow signer Richard Stockton. A prominent figure among the Founding Fathers, Adams was part of the leadership that ignited the American Revolution, and his extensive writings helped establish many of the political and philosophical principles. He not only assisted in drafting the Declaration but also helped navigate it through the Continental Congress.

The subsequent career of Adams—as a diplomat and first Vice President and second President of the United States—overshadows those of all the other signers except Jefferson. Adams was also the progenitor of a distinguished family. His son John Quincy gained renown as diplomat, Congressman, Secretary of State, and President. John’s grandson Charles Francis and great-grandsons John Quincy II, Charles Francis, Jr., Henry, and Brooks excelled in politics, diplomacy, literature, historiography, and public service.

The later career of Adams—as a diplomat, the first Vice President, and the second President of the United States—overshadows those of all the other signers except Jefferson. Adams also had a distinguished family. His son John Quincy became well-known as a diplomat, Congressman, Secretary of State, and President. John's grandson Charles Francis and great-grandsons John Quincy II, Charles Francis Jr., Henry, and Brooks excelled in politics, diplomacy, literature, historiography, and public service.

Adams, descended from a long line of yeomen farmers, was born in 1735 at Braintree (later Quincy), Mass. He graduated from Harvard College in 1755, and for a short time taught school at Worcester, Mass. At that time, he considered entering the ministry, but decided instead to follow the law and began its study with a local lawyer. Adams was admitted to the bar at Boston in 1758 and began34 to practice in his hometown. Six years later, he married Abigail Smith, who was to bear three sons and a daughter. She was also the first mistress of the White House and the only woman in U.S. history to be the wife of one President and the mother of another.

Adams, coming from a long line of small farmers, was born in 1735 in Braintree (now Quincy), Massachusetts. He graduated from Harvard College in 1755 and briefly taught school in Worcester, Massachusetts. At that time, he thought about becoming a minister but ultimately chose to pursue law and began studying it with a local lawyer. Adams was admitted to the bar in Boston in 1758 and started practicing in his hometown. Six years later, he married Abigail Smith, who would give birth to three sons and a daughter. She was also the first lady of the White House and the only woman in U.S. history to be the wife of one President and the mother of another.

Adams, like many others, was propelled into the Revolutionary camp by the Stamp Act. In 1765 he wrote a protest for Braintree that scores of other Massachusetts towns adopted. Three years later, he temporarily left his family behind and moved to Boston. He advanced in the law, but devoted more and more of his time to the patriot cause. In 1768 he achieved recognition throughout the Colonies for his defense of John Hancock, whom British customs officials had charged with smuggling. Adams later yielded to a stern sense of legal duty but incurred some public hostility by representing the British soldiers charged with murder in the Boston Massacre (1770). Ill health forced him to return to Braintree following a term in the colonial legislature (1770–71), and for the next few years he divided his time between there and Boston.

Adams, like many others, was pushed into the Revolutionary camp by the Stamp Act. In 1765, he wrote a protest for Braintree that many other Massachusetts towns adopted. Three years later, he temporarily left his family and moved to Boston. He advanced in his legal career but spent more and more time supporting the patriot cause. In 1768, he gained recognition throughout the Colonies for defending John Hancock, who had been accused of smuggling by British customs officials. Adams later felt a strong sense of legal duty but faced public backlash for representing the British soldiers charged with murder in the Boston Massacre (1770). Ill health forced him to return to Braintree after serving a term in the colonial legislature (1770–71), and for the next few years, he split his time between Braintree and Boston.

A 3-year stint in the Continental Congress (1774–77), punctuated by short recuperative leaves and service in the colonial legislature in 1774–75, brought Adams national fame. Because he was sharply attuned to the temper of Congress and aware that many Members resented Massachusetts extremism, he at first acceded to conciliatory efforts with Britain and restrained himself publicly. When Congress opted for independence, he became its foremost advocate, eschewing conciliation and urging a colonial confederation.

A 3-year term in the Continental Congress (1774–77), interrupted by short breaks for recovery and his work in the colonial legislature in 1774–75, brought Adams national attention. He was very aware of the mood in Congress and knew that many members were frustrated with Massachusetts’ radical approach, so he initially supported efforts to make peace with Britain and held back in public. When Congress decided to pursue independence, he became its strongest supporter, abandoning attempts at compromise and promoting the idea of a colonial confederation.

Adams was a master of workable compromise and meaningful debate, though he was sometimes impatient. He chaired 25 of the more than 90 committees on which he sat, the most important of which dealt with military and naval affairs. He played an instrumental part in obtaining Washington’s appointment as commander in chief of the Continental Army. Adams was a member of the five-man committee charged with drafting the Declaration in June of 1776, though he probably made no major changes in Jefferson’s draft. But, more directly involved, he defended it from its congressional detractors, advocated it to the wavering, and guided it to passage.

Adams was a pro at finding workable compromises and engaging in meaningful debates, although he could be a bit impatient at times. He led 25 of the more than 90 committees he served on, with the most significant ones focused on military and naval issues. He played a key role in getting Washington appointed as commander in chief of the Continental Army. Adams was part of the five-member committee responsible for drafting the Declaration in June 1776, although he likely didn’t make any major changes to Jefferson’s draft. However, he was actively involved in defending it against congressional critics, persuading those who were unsure, and ensuring its passage.

The independence battle won, exhausted by the incessant toil and strain and worried about his finances and family, Adams in November 1777 retired from Congress—never to return. He headed back to Braintree intending to resume his law practice. But, before the month35 expired, Congress appointed him to a diplomatic post in Europe—a phase of his career that consumed more than a decade (1777–88).

The independence battle won, worn out from the endless work and stress and concerned about his finances and family, Adams retired from Congress in November 1777—never to return. He went back to Braintree planning to restart his law practice. But, before the month35 was over, Congress appointed him to a diplomatic position in Europe—a part of his career that lasted more than a decade (1777–88).

Adams served in France during the period 1778–85, interrupted only by a visit to the United States in the summer of 1779, during which he attended the Massachusetts constitutional convention. Independent-minded and forthright, as well as somewhat jealous of the fame and accomplishments of others, he frequently found himself at odds with fellow diplomats Benjamin Franklin and Arthur Lee, as well as French officials, whose policies toward the Colonies he mistrusted. He joined Franklin and John Jay, however, in negotiating the Treaty of Paris (1783), by which Britain recognized the independence of the United States.

Adams was in France from 1778 to 1785, except for a trip to the United States in the summer of 1779, during which he participated in the Massachusetts constitutional convention. He was independent-minded and straightforward, but also somewhat resentful of the success of others. This often put him in conflict with fellow diplomats Benjamin Franklin and Arthur Lee, as well as French officials, whose policies toward the Colonies he did not trust. Nonetheless, he teamed up with Franklin and John Jay to negotiate the Treaty of Paris (1783), which established Britain’s recognition of the United States' independence.

Meanwhile, during the preceding 3 years, Adams had persuaded the Dutch to recognize the Colonies as an independent Nation, grant a series of loans, and negotiate a treaty of alliance. As the first American Envoy to Great Britain (1785–88), he strove to resolve questions arising from the Treaty of Paris and to calm the harsh feelings between the two countries.

Meanwhile, over the last three years, Adams had convinced the Dutch to recognize the Colonies as an independent nation, provide a series of loans, and negotiate a treaty of alliance. As the first American Envoy to Great Britain (1785–88), he worked to address issues stemming from the Treaty of Paris and to ease the strained relations between the two countries.

Back in the United States, Adams was soon elected as the first Vice President (1789–97), an office he considered insignificant but in which he emerged as a leader of the Federalist Party. During his stormy but statesmanlike Presidency (1797–1801), he inherited the deep political discord between the Hamiltonians and Jeffersonians that had taken root during Washington’s administration. Adams pursued a neutral course without abandoning his principles. He kept the United States out of a declared war with France and achieved an amicable peace. But he proved unable to unite his party, divided by Hamilton’s machinations and the ramifications of the French Revolution.

Back in the United States, Adams was soon elected as the first Vice President (1789–97), a position he thought was unimportant but where he became a leader of the Federalist Party. During his turbulent yet statesmanlike presidency (1797–1801), he faced the intense political conflict between the Hamiltonians and Jeffersonians that had developed during Washington’s time in office. Adams followed a neutral path without compromising his beliefs. He kept the United States out of a declared war with France and managed to secure a peaceful resolution. However, he struggled to bring his party together, which was split by Hamilton’s schemes and the effects of the French Revolution.

The Jeffersonians drove the Federalists out of office in 1800, and Adams retired to Quincy, where he spent his later years quietly. The death of his wife in 1818 saddened him, but he never lost interest in public affairs and lived to see his son John Quincy become President. John died at the age of 90 just a few hours after Jefferson, on July 4, 1826—dramatically enough the 50th anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration. Except for Charles Carroll, who was to live until 1832, Adams and Jefferson were the last two surviving signers. The remains of John and Abigail Adams are interred in a basement crypt at the United First Parish Church in Quincy.

The Jeffersonians pushed the Federalists out of office in 1800, and Adams retired to Quincy, where he spent his later years in peace. The death of his wife in 1818 made him sad, but he never lost interest in public affairs and lived to see his son John Quincy become President. John died at age 90 just a few hours after Jefferson, on July 4, 1826—ironically, the 50th anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration. Besides Charles Carroll, who lived until 1832, Adams and Jefferson were the last two surviving signers. The remains of John and Abigail Adams are buried in a basement crypt at the United First Parish Church in Quincy.


36

36

Samuel Adams

MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS

“Firebrand of the Revolution,” Samuel Adams probably more than almost any other individual instigated and organized colonial resistance to the Crown. A talented polemicist and agitator-propagandist who relied more on his facile pen than the podium in behind-the-scenes manipulation of men and events, he religiously believed in the righteousness of his political causes, to which he persistently tried to convert others. He failed in business, neglected his family, gained a reputation as an eccentric, and demonstrated as much indifference to his own welfare as he did solicitousness for that of the public. His second cousin John Adams, more of a statesman, eclipsed him in the Continental Congress, though Samuel signed both the Declaration and the Articles of Confederation. In his later years, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts bestowed on him many high offices, capped by the governorship.

Known as the “Firebrand of the Revolution,” Samuel Adams likely did more than almost anyone else to motivate and organize colonial resistance against the Crown. He was a skilled debater and an agitator-propagandist who relied more on his quick writing than on speeches to subtly influence people and events. He firmly believed in the righteousness of his political causes and constantly sought to persuade others of their importance. He faced challenges in business, neglected his family, earned a reputation for being eccentric, and showed as much disregard for his own well-being as he did concern for the public's. His second cousin, John Adams, being more of a statesman, outshined him in the Continental Congress, although Samuel signed both the Declaration and the Articles of Confederation. In his later years, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts recognized him with numerous high offices, culminating in the governorship.

Adams was one of 12 offspring of a prosperous and politically active brewer and landowner. He was born at Boston in 1722 and enjoyed an excellent education at the Boston Latin School and Harvard College. Upon his graduation in 1740, he first demonstrated his lifelong aversion to normal employment. He studied law for awhile and then skipped from job to job, working for a time in his father’s brewery as well as in a counting house and dissipating a paternal loan in an unsuccessful business venture.

Adams was one of 12 children of a successful and politically engaged brewer and landowner. He was born in Boston in 1722 and received a great education at the Boston Latin School and Harvard College. After graduating in 1740, he showed his lifelong dislike for conventional jobs right away. He studied law for a bit and then bounced from job to job, working for a while in his father's brewery, in a counting house, and wasting a loan from his dad on a failed business venture.

When his father died in 1748 and his mother soon afterwards, Adams inherited a sizable estate, including the family home and brewery. By 1764, when the colonial quarrel with Britain began, he had long since lost the latter. And, during the previous 8 years as city tax collector, he had fallen in arrears about £8,000 in his collections.37 At the age of 42, unable to support a new wife and two children from his first marriage and residing in his rundown birthplace, he was destitute and besieged by creditors. He subsisted mainly on gifts and donations from loyal friends and neighbors.

When his father died in 1748 and his mother soon after, Adams inherited a large estate, including the family home and brewery. By 1764, when the colonial dispute with Britain started, he had already lost the brewery. In the eight years he served as the city tax collector, he had fallen behind by about £8,000 in his collections.37 At 42, unable to support a new wife and two children from his first marriage while living in his dilapidated hometown, he was broke and overwhelmed by creditors. He mostly survived on gifts and donations from loyal friends and neighbors.

Adams was a failure by most standards, but he had long before found the only meaningful “occupation” he ever pursued. For almost two decades he had been active in local political clubs, where he earned a reputation as a writer and emerged as leader of the “popular” party that opposed the powerful conservative aristocracy controlling the Massachusetts government. As clerk in the colonial legislature (1765–74), he drafted most of the body’s official papers and quickly seized the tools of power. He pounced on the taxation issue raised by the Sugar and Stamp Acts (1764–65), and within a year he and his party fanned popular hatred of the conservatives and gained control of the legislature. He also spurred organization of the militant Boston Sons of Liberty, a secret society. As time went on, the stridency of his anti-British harangues escalated and sometimes became shrill enough to distress John Hancock and John Adams.

Adams was considered a failure by most standards, but he had long discovered the only meaningful “occupation” he ever pursued. For almost twenty years, he had been involved in local political clubs, where he built a reputation as a writer and became the leader of the “popular” party that opposed the powerful conservative aristocracy in control of the Massachusetts government. As a clerk in the colonial legislature (1765–74), he drafted most of the official documents and quickly took hold of the tools of power. He jumped on the taxation issue raised by the Sugar and Stamp Acts (1764–65), and within a year, he and his party fueled public anger against the conservatives and gained control of the legislature. He also encouraged the formation of the militant Boston Sons of Liberty, a secret society. As time passed, the intensity of his anti-British speeches increased and sometimes became loud enough to concern John Hancock and John Adams.

The Townshend Acts (1767), imposing a series of taxes on imports, provided Adams with a new cause for dissent. He urged merchants not to purchase goods from Britain, fomented opposition toward customs officials, inflamed the resentment toward British troops stationed in the colony that led to the Boston Massacre (1770), and humiliated the Royal Governor so much that he was recalled. Adams also authored a circular letter protesting British taxation and advocating united opposition. When, in 1768, the Massachusetts legislature sent it to the 12 other colonial assemblies, the Royal Governor dissolved the legislature, soon a common British practice in America. All these activities, coupled with authorship of scores of newspaper articles and extensive correspondence with prominent persons in the Colonies and England, brought Adams fame.

The Townshend Acts (1767), which placed a series of taxes on imports, gave Adams a new reason to protest. He encouraged merchants to stop buying British goods, stirred up resistance against customs officials, increased the anger toward British troops stationed in the colony that eventually led to the Boston Massacre (1770), and publicly shamed the Royal Governor to the point that he was recalled. Adams also wrote a circular letter opposing British taxation and promoting united resistance. When, in 1768, the Massachusetts legislature sent this letter to the 12 other colonial assemblies, the Royal Governor dissolved the legislature, which soon became a common British tactic in America. All these actions, along with writing numerous newspaper articles and maintaining extensive correspondence with influential figures in the Colonies and England, earned Adams widespread recognition.

The conservative reaction on the part of merchants, the legislature, and the populace that surfaced after the repeal of practically all the Townshend Acts in 1770 failed to stifle Adams, though his popularity and influence declined. Relentlessly, in perhaps his chief contribution to the Revolution, he kept the controversy alive by filling the columns of the Boston newspapers with reports of British transgressions and warnings of more to come. Furthermore, in 1772 he began constructing the framework of a Revolutionary organization in Massachusetts.38 Drawing on a similar scheme he had proposed for all the Colonies 2 years earlier but which had come to naught, he convinced Boston and other towns to create committees of correspondence. The next year, he was appointed to the Massachusetts committee, formed in response to a call from the Virginia House of Burgesses.

The conservative backlash from merchants, lawmakers, and the public that arose after the repeal of nearly all the Townshend Acts in 1770 didn’t stop Adams, even though his popularity and influence took a hit. He kept the debate going, which was perhaps his main contribution to the Revolution, by constantly filling the Boston newspapers with reports of British wrongdoings and warnings of more to come. Additionally, in 1772, he started to build a Revolutionary organization in Massachusetts. Drawing on a similar plan he had suggested for all the Colonies two years earlier that had gone nowhere, he got Boston and other towns to set up committees of correspondence. The following year, he was appointed to the Massachusetts committee, formed in response to a call from the Virginia House of Burgesses.38

Passage of the Tea Act (1773) provided the spark Adams was seeking to rekindle the flame of rebellion. He helped to incite and probably participated in the “Boston Tea Party,” which engendered a series of rebellious incidents throughout the Colonies and pushed them closer to war. Parliament retaliated the next spring by passing a series of acts designed to punish Massachusetts.

Passage of the Tea Act (1773) provided the spark Adams was seeking to reignite the flame of rebellion. He helped to incite and likely participated in the “Boston Tea Party,” which led to a series of rebellious incidents throughout the Colonies and pushed them closer to war. Parliament retaliated the next spring by passing a series of acts aimed at punishing Massachusetts.

Adams, recognizing that the other Colonies would only adopt non-intercourse measures in concert, urged an intercolonial congress to discuss mutual grievances and plan a united course of action. Subsequently, in June, the Massachusetts house of representatives, meeting behind locked doors to prevent interference by the Royal Governor, resolved to invite the other 12 Colonies to send representatives to Philadelphia in September and also appointed five Delegates, including Adams. That same day, the Royal Governor disbanded the legislature for the last time. Before heading for Philadelphia, outfitted in new clothes supplied by friends, Adams helped organize the convention that adopted the Suffolk Resolves, which in effect declared Massachusetts to be in a state of rebellion.

Adams, realizing that the other Colonies would only implement non-intercourse measures together, pushed for an intercolonial congress to talk about shared grievances and plan a unified response. Then, in June, the Massachusetts House of Representatives, meeting behind closed doors to avoid interference from the Royal Governor, decided to invite the other 12 Colonies to send representatives to Philadelphia in September and also appointed five Delegates, including Adams. That same day, the Royal Governor disbanded the legislature for the last time. Before heading to Philadelphia, dressed in new clothes provided by friends, Adams helped organize the convention that adopted the Suffolk Resolves, which effectively declared Massachusetts to be in a state of rebellion.

Adams served in the Continental Congress until 1781, longer than most other Delegates, but his role was less conspicuous than his preceding career augured. In the early sessions, most of the time he shrewdly stayed in the background with his fellow Massachusetts Delegates, whose radicalism offended most of their colleagues. And, throughout the Congress, he walked in the shadow of John Adams, who dominated the proceedings.

Adams was part of the Continental Congress until 1781, longer than most of the other delegates, but his role wasn't as prominent as his earlier career suggested it would be. During the early sessions, he often wisely kept a low profile alongside his fellow Massachusetts delegates, whose radical views annoyed many of their peers. Throughout the Congress, he operated in the shadow of John Adams, who was the standout figure in the discussions.

But nothing in the latter’s career could match the drama of an episode involving Samuel in the interim between the First and Second Continental Congresses. Back at Lexington, Mass., one night in April 1775, he and Hancock had barely escaped the British force seeking to capture the colonial supply depot at Concord. The outbreak of armed conflict the next dawn—a “glorious morning” for Adams—marked the beginning of the War for Independence.

But nothing in the latter's career could compare to the drama of an episode involving Samuel during the time between the First and Second Continental Congresses. One night in April 1775 in Lexington, Mass., he and Hancock narrowly escaped a British force trying to seize the colonial supply depot at Concord. The start of armed conflict the next morning—a “glorious morning” for Adams—marked the beginning of the War for Independence.

While still in Congress, in 1779–80 Adams participated in the Massachusetts constitutional convention. He returned to Boston for39 good the next year and entered the State senate (1781–88), over which he presided. He refused to attend the Constitutional Convention of 1787 because of his objection to a stronger National Government, and the following year unenthusiastically took part in the Massachusetts ratifying convention. A lifetime of public service culminated in his election as Lieutenant Governor (1789–93), interim Governor in the latter year upon Hancock’s death, and Governor (1794–97). Still living in “honest poverty,” he died at Boston in 1803 at the age of 81 and was buried in the Old Granary Burying Ground.

While still in Congress, from 1779 to 1780, Adams took part in the Massachusetts constitutional convention. He returned to Boston for good the next year and joined the State Senate (1781–88), where he served as president. He chose not to attend the Constitutional Convention of 1787 because he opposed a stronger National Government, and the following year participated in the Massachusetts ratifying convention with little enthusiasm. His long career in public service culminated in his election as Lieutenant Governor (1789–93), serving as interim Governor that same year after Hancock’s death, and then as Governor (1794–97). Still living in “honest poverty,” he died in Boston in 1803 at the age of 81 and was buried in the Old Granary Burying Ground.


Josiah Bartlett

NEW HAMPSHIRE

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Thanks to the voting order in the Continental Congress, Josiah Bartlett of New Hampshire was probably the first Delegate to vote for independence, the second to sign the Declaration (after President John Hancock), and the first to ballot for and pen his name to the Articles of Confederation. He also has the distinction of being one of several physician signers. His State service, more extensive than the National, included the governorship.

Due to the voting order in the Continental Congress, Josiah Bartlett from New Hampshire was probably the first Delegate to vote for independence, the second to sign the Declaration (after President John Hancock), and the first to vote for and write his name on the Articles of Confederation. He is also significant for being one of the few doctors who signed. His contributions to the state were more extensive than his national role, including serving as governor.

Bartlett was born in 1729 at Amesbury, Mass. At the age of 16, equipped with a common school education and some knowledge of Latin and Greek, he began to study medicine in the office of a relative. Five years later, in 1750, he hung out his shingle at nearby Kingston, N.H. He quickly won a name not only as a general practitioner40 but also as an experimenter and innovator in diagnosis and treatment. Marrying in 1754, he fathered 12 children.

Bartlett was born in 1729 in Amesbury, Massachusetts. At 16, with a basic education and some knowledge of Latin and Greek, he began studying medicine with a relative. Five years later, in 1750, he set up his practice in nearby Kingston, New Hampshire. He quickly gained a reputation not just as a general practitioner40 but also as an innovator and experimenter in diagnosis and treatment. After marrying in 1754, he had 12 children.

During the decade or so preceding the outbreak of the War for Independence, Bartlett held the offices of justice of the peace, militia colonel, and legislator. In 1774 he cast his lot with the Revolutionaries. He became a member of the New Hampshire committee of correspondence and the first provincial congress, which came into being when the Royal Governor disbanded the colonial assembly. Bartlett was elected that same year to the Continental Congress, but tragedy intervened and kept him at home. Arsonists, possibly Loyalists, burned his house to the ground. Discouraged but undeterred, he immediately constructed a new one on the very same site.

During the decade before the start of the War for Independence, Bartlett served as a justice of the peace, militia colonel, and legislator. In 1774, he joined the Revolutionaries. He became a member of the New Hampshire committee of correspondence and the first provincial congress, which was formed after the Royal Governor disbanded the colonial assembly. That same year, Bartlett was elected to the Continental Congress, but tragedy struck and kept him home. Arsonists, likely Loyalists, burned his house to the ground. Discouraged but not defeated, he quickly built a new one on the same spot.

While in Congress (1775–76), Bartlett also served on the New Hampshire council of safety. Although he rarely participated in congressional debates, whose seeming futility vexed him, he sat on various committees. He was reelected in 1777, but was too exhausted to attend. He nevertheless managed in August to lend his medical skills to Gen. John Stark’s force of New Hampshire militia and Continental troops. They defeated a predominantly German element of Gen. John Burgoyne’s command in the Battle of Bennington, N.Y.—one of the reverses that helped force him to surrender 2 months later at Saratoga, N.Y. Bartlett’s last tour in Congress was in 1778–79, after which he refused reelection because of fatigue.

While in Congress (1775–76), Bartlett also served on the New Hampshire council of safety. Although he rarely took part in congressional debates, which he found frustrating, he was a member of various committees. He was reelected in 1777, but was too worn out to attend. However, he still found time in August to offer his medical expertise to Gen. John Stark’s group of New Hampshire militia and Continental troops. They defeated mainly German forces under Gen. John Burgoyne in the Battle of Bennington, N.Y.—one of the setbacks that contributed to his surrender two months later at Saratoga, N.Y. Bartlett’s final term in Congress was in 1778–79, after which he declined reelection due to fatigue.

Bartlett spent the remainder of his life on the State scene. Despite his lack of legal training, he sat first as chief justice of the court of common pleas (1779–82), then as associate (1782–88) and chief (1788–90) justice of the Superior Court. Meantime, in 1788, he had taken part in the State convention that ratified the Federal Constitution, which he strongly favored. The next year, probably on account of his age and the weight of his judicial duties, he declined election to the U.S. Senate. The following year, he became chief executive, or president, of the State. He held that title for 2 years, in 1793–94 being named the first Governor, as the newly amended constitution redesignated the position.

Bartlett spent the rest of his life involved in state affairs. Even though he had no formal legal training, he served first as the chief justice of the court of common pleas (1779–82), and then as an associate (1782–88) and chief (1788–90) justice of the Superior Court. In 1788, he participated in the state convention that ratified the Federal Constitution, which he strongly supported. The following year, likely due to his age and the demands of his judicial responsibilities, he turned down an election to the U.S. Senate. The year after that, he became the chief executive, or president, of the state. He held that title for two years, and in 1793–94, he was named the first Governor, as the newly amended constitution changed the title.

Despite all his political activities, Bartlett had never lost interest in the field of medicine. In 1790 Dartmouth College conferred on him an honorary degree of Doctor of Medicine. The next year, he founded the New Hampshire Medical Society and became its first president.41 In 1794, the year before he died in Kingston at the age of 65, ill health forced his retirement from public life. His remains lie in the yard of the Universalist Church in Kingston.

Despite all his political activities, Bartlett had never lost interest in medicine. In 1790, Dartmouth College awarded him an honorary degree of Doctor of Medicine. The following year, he established the New Hampshire Medical Society and became its first president.41 In 1794, the year before he passed away in Kingston at the age of 65, his poor health forced him to retire from public life. He is buried in the yard of the Universalist Church in Kingston.


Carter Braxton

VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA

Carter Braxton, an aristocratic planter and probably the most conservative of the seven Virginia signers, originally opposed independence but later changed his mind and signed the Declaration. His tour in the Continental Congress lasted less than a year, but he held State office for most of his life. His two wives bore him 18 children, more than any other signer fathered.

Carter Braxton, a wealthy plantation owner and probably the most traditional among the seven Virginia signers, initially opposed independence but later decided to support it and signed the Declaration. He served in the Continental Congress for under a year, yet he held various state positions for much of his life. His two wives bore him 18 children, more than any other signer had.

Braxton was born in 1736 at Newington Plantation, on the Mattaponi River, in King and Queen County, Va. His father was a wealthy and politically influential planter. His mother, who died at his birth, was the daughter of Robert “King” Carter, a prominent landowner and politician.

Braxton was born in 1736 at Newington Plantation, on the Mattaponi River, in King and Queen County, Virginia. His father was a wealthy and politically connected planter. His mother, who passed away during childbirth, was the daughter of Robert “King” Carter, a well-known landowner and politician.

In 1755, the same year Braxton graduated from the College of William and Mary, he married. His bride died in childbirth 2 years later. The following year, he left for an extended visit to England. He returned to Virginia in 1760 and moved into Elsing Green, an estate overlooking the Pamunkey River, in King William County, that his brother George had apparently built for him in 1758 during his absence. At the age of 25, in 1761, Carter remarried and entered the House of Burgesses. He served there, except for a term as county42 sheriff in 1772–73, until 1775. Meantime, in 1767, he had erected a new home, Chericoke, a couple of miles northwest of Elsing Green.

In 1755, the same year Braxton graduated from the College of William and Mary, he got married. His wife died during childbirth two years later. The next year, he went on an extended trip to England. He came back to Virginia in 1760 and moved into Elsing Green, an estate overlooking the Pamunkey River in King William County, which his brother George had apparently built for him in 1758 while he was away. At 25, in 1761, Carter remarried and joined the House of Burgesses. He served there, except for a term as county 42 sheriff in 1772–73, until 1775. In the meantime, in 1767, he had built a new home, Chericoke, a couple of miles northwest of Elsing Green.

When the trouble with Great Britain erupted, Braxton, like many other conservatives, sided with the patriots, though he did not condone violence. In 1769 he signed the Virginia Resolves, a document protesting parliamentary regulation of the colony’s affairs, and the Virginia Association, a nonimportation agreement. During the period 1774–76, he attended various Revolutionary conventions. In 1775, upon dissolution of the royal government, he accepted a position on the council of safety, the temporary governing body.

When the conflict with Great Britain broke out, Braxton, like many other conservatives, supported the patriots, although he did not approve of violence. In 1769, he signed the Virginia Resolves, a document that protested against parliamentary control over the colony's affairs, and the Virginia Association, which was a nonimportation agreement. Between 1774 and 1776, he attended several Revolutionary conventions. In 1775, after the royal government was dissolved, he took a position on the council of safety, the temporary governing body.

In the spring of that year, Braxton was instrumental in preventing the outbreak of war in Virginia. On April 20, the day after the clashes at Lexington and Concord, Royal Governor Lord John M. Dunmore seized the gunpowder in the Williamsburg magazine. Several colonial militia units prepared to retaliate, but moderate leaders such as George Washington and Peyton Randolph restrained them. Patrick Henry, however, refusing to be pacified, led a group of the Hanover County militia into Williamsburg and demanded the return of the gunpowder or payment for it. Before any hostilities occurred, Braxton, as spokesman for Henry, met with crown official Richard Corbin, his father-in-law, and convinced him to pay for the powder.

In the spring of that year, Braxton played a key role in stopping the outbreak of war in Virginia. On April 20, the day after the clashes at Lexington and Concord, Royal Governor Lord John M. Dunmore took control of the gunpowder in the Williamsburg magazine. Several colonial militia units got ready to fight back, but moderate leaders like George Washington and Peyton Randolph held them back. Patrick Henry, however, refusing to be calm, led a group of the Hanover County militia into Williamsburg and demanded either the return of the gunpowder or compensation for it. Before any violence broke out, Braxton, acting as Henry's spokesperson, met with crown official Richard Corbin, his father-in-law, and persuaded him to pay for the powder.

In the fall of 1775 Braxton was selected to fill a vacancy in Congress caused by the death of Peyton Randolph. Arriving at Philadelphia early in 1776, he at first sharply criticized the independence movement, but eventually yielded to the majority and backed the Declaration. That same year, apparently both in writing and in a speech at a Virginia convention, he urged adoption of a conservative form of State government and expressed such a mistrust of popular government that he lost his congressional appointment. The conservatives, however, elected him to the new State legislature, in which he sat for the rest of his life. For many years, he was also a member of the Governor’s executive council.

In the fall of 1775, Braxton was chosen to take a seat in Congress after Peyton Randolph passed away. He arrived in Philadelphia early in 1776 and initially voiced strong criticism of the independence movement, but eventually went along with the majority and supported the Declaration. That same year, both in writing and during a speech at a Virginia convention, he pushed for a conservative form of state government and showed such distrust of popular government that he lost his congressional position. However, the conservatives elected him to the new state legislature, where he served for the rest of his life. For many years, he was also a member of the Governor’s executive council.

The War for Independence brought financial hardships to Braxton. At its beginning, he had invested heavily in shipping, but the British captured most of his vessels and ravaged some of his plantations and extensive landholdings. Commercial setbacks in later years ruined him. In 1786, though he retained Chericoke, he moved to Richmond, where he died in 1797 at the age of 61. He was buried in the family cemetery adjacent to Chericoke.

The War for Independence caused financial troubles for Braxton. At the start, he had invested a lot in shipping, but the British seized most of his ships and devastated some of his plantations and large landholdings. The business failures in the following years left him broke. In 1786, although he still owned Chericoke, he relocated to Richmond, where he passed away in 1797 at the age of 61. He was buried in the family cemetery next to Chericoke.


43

43

Charles Carroll

MARYLAND

MARYLAND

As one of the wealthiest men in America, Charles Carroll III of Carrollton risked his fortune as well as his life when he joined the Revolutionaries. Possessing one of the most cultivated minds of any of the signers, he achieved remarkable success as planter, businessman, and politician. He was the only Roman Catholic signer, the last to survive, and the longest lived.

As one of the wealthiest individuals in America, Charles Carroll III of Carrollton risked his fortune and his life by joining the Revolutionaries. With one of the brightest minds among the signers, he achieved significant success as a planter, businessman, and politician. He was the only Roman Catholic signer, the last one to survive, and lived the longest.

Of Irish descent, Carroll was born in 1737 at his father’s townhouse, Carroll Mansion in Annapolis. Jesuits educated him until he reached about 11 years of age. He then voyaged to Europe and studied the liberal arts and civil law at various schools and universities in Paris, elsewhere in France, and in London.

Of Irish descent, Carroll was born in 1737 at his father’s townhouse, Carroll Mansion in Annapolis. He was educated by Jesuits until he was about 11 years old. He then traveled to Europe and studied liberal arts and civil law at several schools and universities in Paris, other parts of France, and London.

Carroll sailed home in 1765 at the age of 28, and built a home at Carrollton Manor, a 10,000-acre estate in Frederick County newly deeded to him by his father. At that time, he added “of Carrollton” to his name to distinguish himself from relatives of the same name. For most of his life, however, he preferred for his country residence the family ancestral home, Doughoregan Manor, in Howard County; when in Annapolis, he usually resided at his birthplace. For almost a decade after his return from Europe, barred from public life by his religion, he lived quietly. During that time, in 1768, he married. His offspring numbered seven, three of whom lived to maturity.

Carroll returned home in 1765 at the age of 28 and built a house at Carrollton Manor, a 10,000-acre estate in Frederick County that had just been given to him by his father. At that point, he added “of Carrollton” to his name to differentiate himself from relatives with the same name. However, for most of his life, he preferred his family’s ancestral home, Doughoregan Manor, in Howard County as his country residence; when he was in Annapolis, he usually stayed at his birthplace. For nearly a decade after coming back from Europe, he kept a low profile because of his religion, living quietly. During that time, in 1768, he got married. He had seven children, three of whom survived to adulthood.

In 1773 Carroll became a champion of the patriots through his newspaper attacks on the Proprietary Governor. The latter was44 opposing reforms in officers’ fees and stipends for Anglican clergy that the lower house of the legislature had proposed. From then on, Carroll took a prominent part in provincial affairs. In the years 1774–76 he supported nonimportation measures, attended the first Maryland Revolutionary convention, and served on local and provincial committees of correspondence and the council of safety. In 1776 he and his cousin John, a priest—chosen because of their religion and knowledge of French—traveled to Canada with Benjamin Franklin and Samuel Chase on a congressionally appointed committee that sought but failed to obtain a union of Canada with the Colonies.

In 1773, Carroll became a strong supporter of the patriots through his newspaper criticisms of the Proprietary Governor. The governor was opposing reforms in officers’ fees and salaries for Anglican clergy that the lower house of the legislature had proposed. From that point on, Carroll played a significant role in provincial matters. Between 1774 and 1776, he backed nonimportation measures, attended the first Maryland Revolutionary convention, and served on local and provincial committees for communication and the safety council. In 1776, he and his cousin John, a priest—chosen for their faith and knowledge of French—traveled to Canada with Benjamin Franklin and Samuel Chase as part of a congressionally appointed committee that aimed, but ultimately failed, to secure a union between Canada and the Colonies.

Carroll and Chase arrived back in Philadelphia on June 11 that same year, the day after Congress had postponed the vote on Richard Henry Lee’s independence resolution (June 7) until July 1. Maryland had refused to commit herself. Carroll and Chase rushed to Annapolis, recruited William Paca’s aid, and conducted a whirlwind campaign that persuaded the provincial convention to pass a unanimous independence resolution. It reached Congress just in time to put the colony in the affirmative column on July 1, the day of the first vote. Three days later, Carroll himself became a Delegate and functioned in that capacity until 1778.

Carroll and Chase got back to Philadelphia on June 11 of that year, the day after Congress had postponed the vote on Richard Henry Lee’s independence resolution (June 7) until July 1. Maryland had held out on making a decision. Carroll and Chase hurried to Annapolis, got William Paca on board, and ran a fast campaign that convinced the provincial convention to pass a unanimous independence resolution. It reached Congress just in time to count Maryland in the yes column on July 1, the day of the first vote. Three days later, Carroll himself became a Delegate and served in that role until 1778.

Two years before, Carroll had also been elected to the State senate, a seat he retained until just after the turn of the century. Along with fellow signers Chase and Paca, he was a member of the committee that in 1776 drafted Maryland’s constitution. Elected to but not attending the Constitutional Convention of 1787, he nevertheless allied himself with the Federalists and helped bring about his State’s ratification of the Constitution. In the years 1789–92, while also in the State senate, he served as a U.S. Senator, one of Maryland’s first two.

Two years earlier, Carroll had also been elected to the State Senate, a position he held until just after the turn of the century. Along with fellow signers Chase and Paca, he was part of the committee that drafted Maryland’s constitution in 1776. Although he was elected to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, he didn’t attend, but he still aligned himself with the Federalists and helped secure his State’s ratification of the Constitution. From 1789 to 1792, while also serving in the State Senate, he was one of Maryland’s first two U.S. Senators.

Not reelected to the State senate in 1804, the 67-year-old Carroll retired from public life and concentrated on managing his landholdings, consisting of about 80,000 acres in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New York, and his business interests. The latter included investments in the Patowmack (Potowmack) Company, which established a canal system in the Potomac and Shenandoah Valleys, and its successor the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company. Carroll was also a member of the first board of directors of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad.

Not reelected to the State Senate in 1804, the 67-year-old Carroll retired from public life and focused on managing his land holdings, which included about 80,000 acres in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New York, as well as his business interests. These included investments in the Patowmack Company, which set up a canal system in the Potomac and Shenandoah Valleys, and its successor, the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company. Carroll was also a member of the first board of directors for the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad.

45 In his final years, revered by the Nation as the last surviving signer of the Declaration, Carroll spent most of his time at Doughoregan Manor. But he passed the winters in the home of his youngest daughter and her husband in Baltimore. There, in 1832, he died at the age of 95. His body was interred in the family chapel at Doughoregan Manor.

45 In his last years, admired by the country as the last living signer of the Declaration, Carroll spent most of his time at Doughoregan Manor. However, he spent the winters at the home of his youngest daughter and her husband in Baltimore. There, in 1832, he passed away at the age of 95. His body was laid to rest in the family chapel at Doughoregan Manor.


Samuel Chase

MARYLAND

MARYLAND

Fervid Revolutionary Samuel Chase led the campaign that crushed conservative opposition and alined his colony with the others in the independence struggle. Labeled the “Demosthenes of Maryland” for his fancy albeit effective oratory, he also demonstrated skill as a writer. But his independent attitude, stormy disposition, and outspokenness diluted his political effectiveness. As an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, he became a controversial figure.

Passionate revolutionary Samuel Chase spearheaded the effort that overcame conservative opposition and united his colony with others in the struggle for independence. Renowned as the “Demosthenes of Maryland” for his powerful yet persuasive speeches, he also proved to be a skilled writer. However, his independent thinking, intense personality, and straightforwardness diminished his political effectiveness. As an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, he became a controversial figure.

Chase was the son of an Anglican clergyman. He was born in 1741 at the farmhouse of his mother’s parents on Maryland’s Eastern Shore near the city of Princess Anne. His mother had come there from her home at nearby Allen for a visit. She died at or soon after the birth. Likely Chase’s grandparents cared for him at least a few years, until about the time his father took over a parish in Baltimore. The latter provided the youth with his initial education, mainly in the classics.

Chase was the son of an Anglican priest. He was born in 1741 at his maternal grandparents' farmhouse on Maryland’s Eastern Shore, close to the city of Princess Anne. His mother had traveled there from nearby Allen for a visit. She passed away at or shortly after his birth. It’s probable that Chase’s grandparents looked after him for at least a few years until his father took a parish in Baltimore. His father gave him his early education, which focused primarily on the classics.

Between the ages of 18 and 20, Chase read law with an Annapolis firm and joined the bar in 1761. The next year, he married; his wife bore at least two sons and two daughters. Two years after his marriage, he entered the colonial/State legislature and retained membership for two decades. From the beginning, he opposed the royal government. Annapolis officials denounced him for his participation in the violent protests of the Sons of Liberty in 1765 against the Stamp Act. In 1774–75 he took part in the Maryland committee of correspondence, council of safety, and the provincial convention.

Between the ages of 18 and 20, Chase studied law with a firm in Annapolis and became a lawyer in 1761. The following year, he got married; his wife had at least two sons and two daughters. Two years after getting married, he joined the colonial/State legislature and remained a member for twenty years. From the start, he opposed the royal government. Annapolis officials criticized him for his involvement in the violent protests of the Sons of Liberty in 1765 against the Stamp Act. In 1774–75, he participated in the Maryland committee of correspondence, council of safety, and the provincial convention.

In the former year, Chase had joined the Continental Congress.46 He advocated an embargo on trade with Britain, showed special interest in diplomatic matters, early urged a confederation of the Colonies, defended George Washington from his congressional detractors, and in 1776 journeyed to Montreal with a commission that tried but failed to achieve a union with Canada. When he returned to Philadelphia around the middle of June, Congress had just postponed the vote on the Lee independence resolution. Realizing that Maryland was straddling the fence on the issue, Chase rushed home. Along with Charles Carroll of Carrollton and William Paca, he labored for 2 weeks to overcome opposition and won a committal to independence from the convention. The Maryland Delegates registered it in time for the first congressional vote, on July 1. In 1778 Chase lost his office because of adverse publicity generated by the advantage he had taken of knowledge gained in Congress to engage in a profiteering scheme.

In the past year, Chase had joined the Continental Congress.46 He pushed for a trade embargo with Britain, showed a strong interest in diplomatic issues, early on called for a union of the Colonies, defended George Washington against his critics in Congress, and in 1776 traveled to Montreal with a commission that tried, but ultimately failed, to establish a union with Canada. When he returned to Philadelphia around mid-June, Congress had just postponed the vote on the Lee independence resolution. Realizing that Maryland was undecided on the issue, Chase hurried home. Along with Charles Carroll of Carrollton and William Paca, he worked for two weeks to overcome opposition and secured a commitment to independence from the convention. The Maryland Delegates registered it in time for the first congressional vote, on July 1. In 1778, Chase lost his position because of negative publicity generated by his use of insider information from Congress to participate in a profiteering scheme.

In 1783–84 Chase traveled to London as a State emissary on an unfruitful mission to recover Maryland stock in the Bank of England from two fugitive Loyalists. Upon his return apparently, his first wife having died, he remarried; resumed his law practice; and engaged in various unsuccessful business enterprises that led to bankruptcy in 1789. Meantime, he had reentered politics. In 1785 he had represented Maryland at the Mount Vernon (Va.) Conference, forerunner of the Annapolis Convention. The next year, he moved his family from Annapolis to Baltimore, where he soon became chief judge of the Baltimore County criminal court (1788–95). As a delegate to the Maryland ratifying convention in 1788, he strongly opposed the Constitution, though he later became a staunch Federalist. From 1791 until 1794, while still a county judge, he also held the position of chief justice of the Maryland Superior Court.

In 1783–84, Chase traveled to London as a state representative on a fruitless mission to recover Maryland stock in the Bank of England from two escaped Loyalists. After he returned, it seems that his first wife had died, and he remarried. He restarted his law practice and got involved in several unsuccessful business ventures that led to bankruptcy in 1789. In the meantime, he reentered politics. In 1785, he represented Maryland at the Mount Vernon (Va.) Conference, which was the precursor to the Annapolis Convention. The following year, he moved his family from Annapolis to Baltimore, where he quickly became the chief judge of the Baltimore County criminal court (1788–95). As a delegate to the Maryland ratifying convention in 1788, he strongly opposed the Constitution, although he later became a committed Federalist. From 1791 until 1794, while still serving as a county judge, he also held the role of chief justice of the Maryland Superior Court.

Chase achieved his greatest fame as an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (1796–1811). He was one of the ablest jurists in the body prior to Chief Justice John Marshall (1801–35), and delivered many influential opinions. His inability to control his political partisanship while on the bench—a trait he shared with some other judges of his time—led to various judicial improprieties and impeachment proceedings against him in 1805. But Congress acquitted him.

Chase became most famous as an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (1796–1811). He was one of the most skilled judges before Chief Justice John Marshall (1801–35) and gave many important opinions. His struggle to manage his political bias while serving—as other judges did at the time—resulted in several judicial missteps and impeachment proceedings against him in 1805. However, Congress found him not guilty.

Still a Justice, Chase died in Baltimore 2 months after he celebrated his 70th birthday. His grave is in St. Paul’s Cemetery.

Still a Justice, Chase passed away in Baltimore two months after celebrating his 70th birthday. His grave is located in St. Paul’s Cemetery.


47

47

Abraham Clark

NEW JERSEY

NEW JERSEY

Abraham Clark—farmer, surveyor, self-taught lawyer, and politician—typifies those signers who dedicated most of their lives to public service but never gained national renown.

Abraham Clark—farmer, surveyor, self-taught lawyer, and politician—represents the signers who devoted most of their lives to public service but never gained national recognition.

An only child, Clark was born in 1726 at his father’s farm in what is now Roselle, N.J. In his boyhood, he was too frail for farmwork. He received only a minimum of formal education, but in his independent study demonstrated a bent for mathematics. When he reached manhood, besides farming his father’s land, he took up surveying and informally read law to aid in mediating land disputes. Although probably never admitted to the bar, he gained a reputation as the “poor man’s counselor” for his willingness to dispense free legal advice or accept produce or merchandise in lieu of a fee. He married in 1749, and fathered 10 children.

An only child, Clark was born in 1726 on his father’s farm in what is now Roselle, N.J. As a boy, he was too weak for farm work. He had only a basic education, but through self-study, he showed a talent for mathematics. When he became an adult, in addition to farming his father's land, he took up surveying and casually studied law to help settle land disputes. Although he likely was never admitted to the bar, he earned a reputation as the “poor man’s counselor” for being willing to give free legal advice or accept produce or goods instead of payment. He got married in 1749 and had 10 children.

Clark followed his father’s example by taking an active part in civic affairs. For many years, he served the Crown as high sheriff of Essex County and as clerk in the colonial legislature. The exact date of his entry into the patriot ranks is not known, but in the period 1774–76 he became a member and secretary of the New Jersey council of safety, attended several Revolutionary conventions, and won election to the provincial assembly. In June of the latter year, he and four other men replaced the existing congressional Delegates, who were opposing independence.

Clark followed in his father's footsteps by actively participating in civic matters. For many years, he served the Crown as the high sheriff of Essex County and as a clerk in the colonial legislature. The exact date he joined the patriots isn't known, but between 1774 and 1776, he became a member and secretary of the New Jersey council of safety, attended several Revolutionary conventions, and was elected to the provincial assembly. In June of the latter year, he and four other men replaced the current congressional delegates who were against independence.

Despite poor health and deep concern for the welfare of his family and the safety of his home, located not far from an area of British occupation, Clark stayed in Congress throughout the War for Independence48 and sometimes sat concurrently in the State legislature. He suffered additional anxiety when the British captured his two soldier sons and incarcerated them for a time on the prison ship Jersey, where hundreds of captives perished.

Despite his poor health and deep worry for his family’s well-being and the safety of his home, which was close to a British-occupied area, Clark remained in Congress during the War for Independence48 and sometimes also served in the State legislature at the same time. He experienced even more anxiety when the British captured his two soldier sons and imprisoned them for a period on the prison ship Jersey, where hundreds of captives died.

Thousands of American soldiers, including two of Abraham Clark’s sons, endured the agonies of captivity on the British prison ship Jersey.

At the end of the war in 1783, Clark resumed his life back in New Jersey. The next year he began a 3-year tour in the State legislature, which he represented at the Annapolis Convention (1786). The following year, ill health prevented his attendance at the Constitutional Convention. He subsequently opposed the Constitution until it incorporated the Bill of Rights. In 1787–89 he returned to the Continental Congress, but in 1789–90 remained in New Jersey as commissioner to settle his State’s accounts with the Federal Government. In 1791–94 he climaxed a long career of alternating State-National service as a Representative in the Second and Third Congresses.

At the end of the war in 1783, Clark went back to his life in New Jersey. The next year, he started a 3-year term in the State legislature, where he represented the state at the Annapolis Convention (1786). The following year, due to health issues, he couldn't attend the Constitutional Convention. He later opposed the Constitution until it included the Bill of Rights. From 1787 to 1789, he returned to the Continental Congress, but from 1789 to 1790, he stayed in New Jersey as a commissioner to settle his state's accounts with the Federal Government. From 1791 to 1794, he wrapped up a long career of alternating between state and national service as a Representative in the Second and Third Congresses.

Clark was stricken with a sunstroke in 1794 at his birthplace in Roselle, where he had lived all his life except when political duty called him away. He died a few hours later, at the age of 68, in the nearby town of Rahway and was buried there in the Presbyterian Cemetery.

Clark was hit with a sunstroke in 1794 at his hometown in Roselle, where he had lived his entire life except when political duties took him away. He died a few hours later, at the age of 68, in the nearby town of Rahway and was buried there in the Presbyterian Cemetery.


49

49

George Clymer

PENNSYLVANIA

PENNSYLVANIA

George Clymer, a leading Philadelphia merchant, rendered long years of service to his city, State, and Nation. He signed the Constitution as well as the Declaration, and applied his commercial acumen to the financial problems of the Colonies and the Confederation.

George Clymer, a notable merchant from Philadelphia, devoted many years to serving his city, state, and country. He signed both the Constitution and the Declaration, applying his business expertise to address the financial difficulties encountered by the Colonies and the Confederation.

Clymer was orphaned in 1740, only a year after his birth in Philadelphia. A wealthy uncle reared and informally educated him and advanced him from clerk to a full-fledged partner in his mercantile firm, which on his death he bequeathed to his ward. Later, Clymer merged operations with the Merediths, prominent businessmen, and cemented the relationship by marrying his senior partner’s daughter.

Clymer was orphaned in 1740, just a year after his birth in Philadelphia. A wealthy uncle raised him and gave him informal education, promoting him from clerk to a full partner in his mercantile firm, which he left to Clymer upon his death. Later, Clymer combined operations with the Merediths, who were well-known businessmen, and strengthened their connection by marrying his senior partner’s daughter.

Motivated at least partly by the impact of British economic restrictions on his business, Clymer early adopted the Revolutionary cause and was one of the first to recommend independence. He attended patriotic meetings, served on the Pennsylvania council of safety, and in 1773 headed a committee that forced the resignation of Philadelphia tea consignees appointed by Britain under the Tea Act. Inevitably, in light of his economic background, he channeled his energies into financial matters. In 1775–76 he acted as one of the first two Continental treasurers, even personally underwriting the war by exchanging all his own specie for Continental currency.

Motivated at least partly by the effects of British economic restrictions on his business, Clymer quickly embraced the Revolutionary cause and was among the first to advocate for independence. He attended patriotic meetings, served on the Pennsylvania council of safety, and in 1773 led a committee that forced the resignation of Philadelphia tea agents appointed by Britain under the Tea Act. Naturally, given his economic background, he focused his efforts on financial matters. In 1775–76, he served as one of the first two Continental treasurers, even personally supporting the war by exchanging all his own cash for Continental currency.

In the Continental Congress (1776–77 and 1780–82) the quiet and50 unassuming Clymer rarely spoke in debate but made his mark in committee efforts, especially those pertaining to commerce, finance, and military affairs. During and between his two congressional tours, he also served on a series of commissions that conducted important field investigations. In December 1776, when Congress fled from Philadelphia to Baltimore, he and fellow signers George Walton and Robert Morris remained behind to carry on congressional business. Within a year, after their victory at the Battle of Brandywine, Pa. (Sept. 11, 1777), British troops advancing on Philadelphia detoured for the purpose of vandalizing Clymer’s home in Chester County, about 25 miles outside the city, while his wife and children hid nearby in the woods.

In the Continental Congress (1776–77 and 1780–82), the quiet and unassuming Clymer rarely spoke during debates but made significant contributions in committee work, especially in areas related to commerce, finance, and military affairs. During and between his two terms in Congress, he also served on various commissions that conducted important field investigations. In December 1776, when Congress moved from Philadelphia to Baltimore, he and fellow signers George Walton and Robert Morris stayed behind to continue congressional business. Within a year, after their victory at the Battle of Brandywine, Pa. (Sept. 11, 1777), British troops advancing on Philadelphia took a detour to vandalize Clymer’s home in Chester County, about 25 miles outside the city, while his wife and children hid nearby in the woods.

George Clymer lived in this Philadelphia townhouse during the Revolutionary period.

After a brief retirement following his last tour in the Continental Congress, Clymer was reelected in the years 1784–88 to the Pennsylvania legislature, where he had also served part time in 1780–82 while still in Congress. As a State legislator, he advocated reform of the penal code, opposed capital punishment, and represented Pennsylvania in the Constitutional Convention (1787). The next phase51 of his career consisted of service as a U.S. Representative in the First Congress (1789–91), followed by appointment as collector of excise taxes on alcoholic beverages in Pennsylvania (1791–94). In 1795–96 he sat on a Presidential commission that negotiated a treaty with the Indians in Georgia.

After a short retirement following his last term in the Continental Congress, Clymer was reelected from 1784 to 1788 to the Pennsylvania legislature, where he had also served part-time from 1780 to 1782 while still in Congress. As a state legislator, he pushed for reform of the penal code, opposed the death penalty, and represented Pennsylvania at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The next stage of his career involved serving as a U.S. Representative in the First Congress from 1789 to 1791, followed by his appointment as the collector of excise taxes on alcoholic beverages in Pennsylvania from 1791 to 1794. In 1795 and 1796, he served on a presidential commission that negotiated a treaty with the Native Americans in Georgia.

During his retirement, Clymer advanced various community projects, including the Philadelphia Agricultural Society, the Philadelphia Academy of Fine Arts, and the Philadelphia Bank. At the age of 73, in 1813, he died at Summerseat, an estate a few miles outside Philadelphia at Morrisville that he had purchased and moved to in 1806. His grave is in the Friends Meeting House Cemetery at Trenton, N.J.

During his retirement, Clymer supported different community projects, including the Philadelphia Agricultural Society, the Philadelphia Academy of Fine Arts, and the Philadelphia Bank. At 73 years old, he died in 1813 at Summerseat, an estate a few miles outside Philadelphia in Morrisville that he had bought and moved to in 1806. His grave is located in the Friends Meeting House Cemetery in Trenton, N.J.


William Ellery

RHODE ISLAND

Rhode Island

One of a small group of lesser known signers whose achievements were comparatively modest, William Ellery gained little fame beyond his hometown—in sharp contrast to fellow Rhode Island signer Stephen Hopkins. The office of Delegate to the Continental Congress was the only significant position, State or National, to which Ellery ever won election, but he occupied it for a far longer period than most other Members.

William Ellery was one of a few lesser-known signers whose accomplishments were quite modest. He didn’t earn much fame outside his hometown, unlike his fellow signer from Rhode Island, Stephen Hopkins. The position of Delegate to the Continental Congress was the only significant role Ellery was elected to, whether at the state or national level, but he served in it for a much longer period than most other members.

The second son in a family of four, Ellery was born in 1727 at Newport, his lifelong residence. He followed in the footsteps of his father, a rich merchant and political leader, by attending Harvard.52 On his graduation in 1747, he returned home. During the following two decades or so, he tried his hand at several occupations, eventually taking up the study of law, which he began practicing in 1770. Meantime, he had married twice and was to rear two sons and three daughters. Among his grandchildren were William Ellery Channing, influential theologian and apostle of Unitarianism, and Richard Henry Dana, Sr., noted poet and essayist.

The second son in a family of four, Ellery was born in 1727 in Newport, where he lived his whole life. He followed in his father's footsteps, a wealthy merchant and political leader, by attending Harvard.52 After graduating in 1747, he returned home. Over the next two decades, he tried out various jobs, eventually studying law, which he started practicing in 1770. In the meantime, he got married twice and raised two sons and three daughters. Among his grandchildren were William Ellery Channing, an influential theologian and advocate of Unitarianism, and Richard Henry Dana, Sr., a well-known poet and essayist.

By May 1776, when the colonial legislature sent Ellery to the Continental Congress, he had already earned a reputation for his work on local patriotic committees. Tradition records that, at the formal signing of the Declaration on August 2, he placed himself beside the Secretary and observed “undaunted resolution” on every face as the Delegates subscribed to their “death warrant.” The next year, Rhode Island initiated popular election of congressional Delegates, and Ellery’s Newport constituency maintained him in office until 1786 except for the years 1780 and 1782. In 1780 he remained in Philadelphia as an ex officio member of the board of admiralty, on which he had been sitting. His other committee assignments included those dealing with commercial and naval affairs. On occasion, to entertain himself and others, he wrote witty epigrams about various speakers. In 1785 he turned down the chief justiceship of the Rhode Island Superior Court to remain in Congress, where he had attained commanding seniority.

By May 1776, when the colonial legislature sent Ellery to the Continental Congress, he had already built a reputation for his work on local patriotic committees. Tradition says that, at the formal signing of the Declaration on August 2, he positioned himself next to the Secretary and noted “undaunted resolution” on every face as the Delegates signed their “death warrant.” The following year, Rhode Island started electing congressional Delegates through popular vote, and Ellery’s Newport constituency kept him in office until 1786, except for the years 1780 and 1782. In 1780, he stayed in Philadelphia as an ex officio member of the board of admiralty, where he had been serving. His other committee assignments focused on commercial and naval matters. Occasionally, to entertain himself and others, he wrote clever epigrams about various speakers. In 1785, he declined the chief justiceship of the Rhode Island Superior Court to stay in Congress, where he had gained significant seniority.

The very next year, Ellery terminated his congressional career to accept an appointment as commissioner of the Continental Loan Office for Rhode Island (1786–90). Probably the need to straighten out his finances compelled him to accept. British troops in 1778, during their 3-year occupation of Newport, had destroyed his home and property, and he had been too busy to rebuild his fortune. In 1790 President Washington appointed Ellery as customs collector for the district of Newport, a position he held for three decades. Although he was a Federalist, he managed to retain office during the Democratic-Republican administrations, probably because of his Revolutionary record and competence.

The very next year, Ellery ended his congressional career to take a position as commissioner of the Continental Loan Office for Rhode Island (1786–90). He likely accepted this role due to the need to get his finances back on track. British troops had destroyed his home and property during their 3-year occupation of Newport starting in 1778, and he had been too occupied to rebuild his wealth. In 1790, President Washington appointed Ellery as the customs collector for the Newport district, a role he held for thirty years. Although he was a Federalist, he managed to stay in office during the Democratic-Republican administrations, likely due to his Revolutionary credentials and competence.

In his later years, Ellery prospered. He kept active in public affairs and spent many hours in scholarly pursuits and correspondence. Living to 92, a more advanced age than all the signers except Charles Carroll, he died in 1820 at Newport. His remains rest there in the Common Ground Cemetery.

In his later years, Ellery thrived. He remained engaged in public affairs and dedicated many hours to scholarly activities and correspondence. Living to 92, which was a greater age than all the signers except Charles Carroll, he passed away in 1820 in Newport. His remains are laid to rest in the Common Ground Cemetery.


53

53

William Floyd

NEW YORK

NYC

William Floyd, a wealthy landowner-farmer, belongs to the category of signers who played only a peripheral part in the Revolution. Nevertheless, he suffered anguish when British troops and Loyalists ravaged his estate during the war and drove his family into a 7-year exile in Connecticut. He also climbed to the rank of major general in the State militia, and served in the U.S. First Congress.

William Floyd, a rich landowner and farmer, was one of the signers who played a minor role in the Revolution. However, he faced significant hardship when British troops and Loyalists destroyed his estate during the war, forcing his family into a 7-year exile in Connecticut. He also achieved the rank of major general in the state militia and served in the first U.S. Congress.

Floyd was born in 1734 at present Mastic, Long Island, N.Y., in Brookhaven Township. He was the second child and eldest of two sons in a family of nine. His father, a prosperous farmer of Welsh ancestry, kept the youth busy with chores. As a result, his education consisted only of informal instruction at home. When Floyd reached his 20th year, his father and mother died within 2 months of each other, and he inherited a large estate along with the responsibility of caring for his brothers and sisters. Six years later, he married. His bride helped care for the family and assisted in managing the farm, for which slaves supplied most of the labor. A community stalwart, Floyd also devoted considerable time to the affairs of the Brookhaven church, occupied the position of town trustee (1769–71), and moved up in the ranks of the Suffolk County militia to a colonelcy in 1775.

Floyd was born in 1734 in what is now Mastic, Long Island, N.Y., in Brookhaven Township. He was the second child and the oldest of two sons in a family of nine. His father, a successful farmer of Welsh descent, kept him busy with chores. As a result, his education was limited to informal instruction at home. When Floyd turned 20, his parents passed away within two months of each other, and he inherited a large estate along with the responsibility of caring for his siblings. Six years later, he got married. His wife helped care for the family and assisted in managing the farm, which relied mostly on slave labor. A community leader, Floyd also dedicated a lot of time to the Brookhaven church, served as town trustee (1769–71), and rose through the ranks of the Suffolk County militia to become a colonel in 1775.

The Revolutionary movement in New York was much less fervent and started later than that in the other Colonies. The spirited Massachusetts opposition to the Tea Act in the later half of 1773 and in54 1774 created the first major ferment in New York. One of the scattered focal points was eastern Long Island, where Floyd lived. He and many of his neighbors attended meetings that extended sympathy and aid to Massachusetts and protested the closing of the port of Boston by the British. Despite such local outbursts, by the end of 1774 New York was one of only two Colonies, Georgia being the other, in which the patriots did not control the government. For this reason, the Revolutionaries operated mainly on a county basis.

The Revolutionary movement in New York was much less intense and started later than in the other Colonies. The strong opposition in Massachusetts to the Tea Act in the latter half of 1773 and in 54 1774 stirred up the first major activity in New York. One of the key areas was eastern Long Island, where Floyd lived. He and many of his neighbors participated in meetings that expressed support and provided aid to Massachusetts and protested the closure of the Boston port by the British. Despite such local reactions, by the end of 1774, New York was one of only two Colonies, the other being Georgia, where the patriots did not control the government. Because of this, the Revolutionaries mainly operated on a county level.

In 1774 Suffolk County sent Floyd to the Continental Congress. He remained there until 1777, returned in the period 1779–83, and in the interim served in the State senate and on the council of safety. Yielding the floor of Congress to the other New York Delegates, he labored without special distinction on a few committees. But worry about the welfare of his family presented a major distraction. In 1776, when British forces occupied Long Island, his wife, son, and two daughters fled northward across the sound and took refuge in Middletown, Conn. His wife died there in 1781. To make matters worse, the redcoats used his home at Mastic for a barracks, and Loyalists plundered his lands and belongings. When he brought his children back in 1783, he found the fields and timber stripped, the fences destroyed, and the house damaged.

In 1774, Suffolk County sent Floyd to the Continental Congress. He stayed there until 1777, returned from 1779 to 1783, and during that time, he served in the State Senate and on the Council of Safety. Giving way to the other New York delegates in Congress, he worked on a few committees without any special recognition. However, worries about his family's well-being were a significant distraction. In 1776, when British forces took over Long Island, his wife, son, and two daughters escaped north across the sound and sought refuge in Middletown, Connecticut. His wife passed away there in 1781. To make matters worse, the redcoats used his home in Mastic as barracks, and Loyalists looted his property. When he brought his children back in 1783, he discovered the fields and timber stripped, the fences destroyed, and the house damaged.

After the war, Floyd sat for several terms in the State senate, attended the constitutional convention of 1801, supported the Federal Constitution, won election in the years 1789–91 as a Representative in the First Congress, served as presidential elector on four occasions, and became a major general in the New York militia. His second wife, whom he had married in 1784, bore him two daughters.

After the war, Floyd served multiple terms in the State Senate, participated in the constitutional convention of 1801, backed the Federal Constitution, was elected as a Representative in the First Congress from 1789 to 1791, acted as a presidential elector four times, and became a major general in the New York militia. His second wife, whom he married in 1784, gave birth to two daughters.

About this time, Floyd acquired an interest in western lands. The year of his marriage, he purchased a tract in central New York at the headwaters of the Mohawk River in the environs of present Rome; he supplemented this 3 years later by obtaining a State grant of more than 10,000 acres in the area. He spent most of his summers visiting and developing the acreage.

About this time, Floyd became interested in western lands. The year he got married, he bought a piece of land in central New York at the headwaters of the Mohawk River near what is now Rome; three years later, he added to this by getting a state grant of over 10,000 acres in the region. He spent most of his summers visiting and developing the property.

In 1803, in his late sixties, at a time when most men possess lesser ambitions, Floyd deeded his Long Island home and farm to his son Nicoll, and set out with the rest of his family to make a new life on the frontier. During the first year, he built a home at present Westernville, N.Y. There he succumbed, at the age of 86 in 1821, and was buried in the Presbyterian Cemetery.

In 1803, at nearly seventy, when most men have smaller dreams, Floyd transferred ownership of his Long Island home and farm to his son Nicoll and set off with his family to start a new life on the frontier. In the first year, he built a house in what is now Westernville, N.Y. He passed away at the age of 86 in 1821 and was laid to rest in the Presbyterian Cemetery.


55

55

Benjamin Franklin

PENNSYLVANIA

PENNsylvania

Benjamin Franklin, elder statesman of the Revolution and oldest signer of both the Declaration and the Constitution, sat on the committee that drafted the Declaration, attended the Constitutional Convention, and distinguished himself as a diplomat. But he was a self-made and self-educated intellectual colossus whose interests far transcended politics. He won international renown as a printer-publisher, author, philosopher, scientist, inventor, and philanthropist. On both sides of the Atlantic he mingled with the social elite, whom he impressed with his sagacity, wit, and zest for life.

Benjamin Franklin, a key figure in the Revolution and the oldest signer of both the Declaration and the Constitution, was part of the committee that drafted the Declaration, participated in the Constitutional Convention, and made a name for himself as a diplomat. He was also a self-taught intellectual powerhouse with interests that extended far beyond politics. He gained international recognition as a publisher, author, philosopher, scientist, inventor, and philanthropist. On both sides of the Atlantic, he mingled with the elite, impressing them with his wisdom, humor, and zest for life.

Franklin was born in 1706 at Boston. He was the tenth son of a soap- and candle-maker. He received some formal education but was principally self-taught. After serving an apprenticeship to his father between the ages of 10 and 12, he went to work for his half-brother James, a printer. In 1721 the latter founded the New England Courant, the fourth newspaper in the Colonies. Benjamin secretly contributed to it 14 essays, his first published writings.

Franklin was born in 1706 in Boston. He was the tenth son of a soap and candle maker. He received some formal education but was mostly self-taught. After doing an apprenticeship with his father from ages 10 to 12, he started working for his half-brother James, who was a printer. In 1721, James started the New England Courant, the fourth newspaper in the Colonies. Benjamin anonymously contributed 14 essays to it, which were his first published writings.

In 1723, because of dissension with his half-brother, Franklin moved to Philadelphia. He spent only a year there, and then sailed to London for two more years. Back in Philadelphia, he rose rapidly in the printing industry. He published The Pennsylvania Gazette (1730–48), which had been founded by another man in 1728, but his most successful venture was annual Poor Richard’s Almanac56 (1733–58). It won a popularity in the Colonies second only to the Bible, and its fame eventually spread to Europe.

In 1723, after a falling out with his half-brother, Franklin moved to Philadelphia. He only stayed there for a year before sailing to London for another two years. When he returned to Philadelphia, he quickly made his mark in the printing industry. He published The Pennsylvania Gazette (1730–48), which had been started by someone else in 1728, but his biggest success was the annual Poor Richard’s Almanac56 (1733–58). It became incredibly popular in the Colonies, second only to the Bible, and its reputation eventually spread to Europe.

Meantime, in 1730 Franklin had taken a common-law wife, who was to bear him a son and a daughter, as was another woman out of wedlock. By 1748 he had achieved financial independence and gained recognition for his philanthropy and the stimulus he provided to such worthwhile civic causes as libraries, educational institutions, and hospitals. Energetic and tireless, he also found time to pursue his deep interest in science, as well as enter politics.

Meantime, in 1730 Franklin had taken a common-law wife, who was to bear him a son and a daughter, as was another woman out of wedlock. By 1748 he had achieved financial independence and gained recognition for his philanthropy and the support he provided to important civic causes like libraries, educational institutions, and hospitals. Energetic and tireless, he also found time to pursue his strong interest in science and get involved in politics.

Franklin served as clerk (1736–51) and member (1751–64) of the colonial legislature, and as deputy postmaster of Philadelphia (1737–53) and deputy postmaster general of the Colonies (1753–74). In addition, he represented Pennsylvania at the Albany Congress (1754), called to unite the Colonies during the French and Indian War. The congress adopted his “Plan of Union,” but the colonial assemblies rejected it because it encroached on their powers.

Franklin worked as a clerk (1736–51) and a member (1751–64) of the colonial legislature, as well as the deputy postmaster of Philadelphia (1737–53) and deputy postmaster general of the Colonies (1753–74). He also represented Pennsylvania at the Albany Congress (1754), which aimed to unite the Colonies during the French and Indian War. The congress accepted his “Plan of Union,” but the colonial assemblies turned it down because it infringed on their authority.

During the years 1757–62 and 1764–75, Franklin resided in England, originally in the capacity of agent for Pennsylvania and later for Georgia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. During the latter period, which coincided with the growth of colonial unrest, he underwent a political metamorphosis. Until then a contented Englishman in outlook, primarily concerned with Pennsylvania provincial politics, he distrusted popular movements and saw little purpose to be served in carrying principle to extremes. Until the issue of parliamentary taxation undermined the old alliances, he led the conservative Quaker party in its attack on the Anglican proprietary party and its Presbyterian frontier cohorts. His purpose throughout the years at London in fact had been displacement of the Penn family administration by royal authority—the conversion of the province from a proprietary to a royal colony.

During the years 1757–62 and 1764–75, Franklin lived in England, initially as the agent for Pennsylvania and later for Georgia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. During the latter period, which coincided with the rise of colonial unrest, he went through a political transformation. Until then, he had been a satisfied Englishman focused mainly on Pennsylvania provincial politics; he was skeptical of popular movements and felt that extreme principles were often unnecessary. Before the issue of parliamentary taxation disrupted the old alliances, he led the conservative Quaker party in its opposition to the Anglican proprietary party and its Presbyterian frontier supporters. His goal throughout his years in London was actually to replace the Penn family administration with royal authority—essentially changing the province from a proprietary to a royal colony.

It was during the Stamp Act crisis that Franklin evolved from leader of a shattered provincial party’s faction to celebrated spokesman at London for American rights. Although as agent for Pennsylvania he opposed by every conceivable persuasive means enactment of the bill in 1765, he did not at first realize the depth of colonial hostility. He regarded passage as unavoidable and preferred to submit to it while actually working for its repeal. His nomination of a friend and political ally as stamp distributor in Pennsylvania, coupled with his apparent acceptance of the legislation, armed his57 proprietary opponents with explosive issues. Their energetic exploitation of them endangered his reputation at home until reliable information was published demonstrating his unabated opposition. For a time, mob resentment threatened his family and new home in Philadelphia until his tradesmen supporters rallied. Subsequently, Franklin’s defense of the American position in the House of Commons during the debates over the Stamp Act’s repeal restored his prestige at home.

It was during the Stamp Act crisis that Franklin transformed from leading a broken faction of a provincial party to a well-known spokesperson in London for American rights. Although, as the agent for Pennsylvania, he used every persuasive tactic he could think of to oppose the bill in 1765, he initially didn’t grasp the extent of colonial anger. He thought the bill’s passage was inevitable and preferred to comply while actually working to have it repealed. His nomination of a friend and political ally as the stamp distributor in Pennsylvania, along with his apparent acceptance of the legislation, gave his proprietary opponents plenty of controversial issues to work with. Their vigorous use of these issues put his reputation at risk back home until credible information was released showing he still opposed the Act. For a while, public anger threatened his family and new home in Philadelphia until his business supporters came to his aid. Eventually, Franklin’s defense of the American position in the House of Commons during the debates over repealing the Stamp Act restored his standing back home.

Benjamin Franklin being arraigned in 1774 by a committee of Lords of Parliament for disloyalty to the Crown. The following day, he was dismissed as deputy postmaster general of the Colonies.

Franklin returned to Philadelphia in May 1775, and immediately became a Member of the Continental Congress. Thirteen months58 later, he served on the committee that drafted the Declaration. According to a traditional anecdote, when he finished signing he declared, “Gentlemen, we must now all hang together, or we shall most assuredly all hang separately,” He subsequently contributed to the Government in other important ways, and took over the duties of president of the Pennsylvania constitutional convention.

Franklin came back to Philadelphia in May 1775 and quickly joined the Continental Congress. Thirteen months58 later, he was part of the committee that wrote the Declaration. According to a well-known story, after he finished signing it, he said, “Gentlemen, we must now all hang together, or we shall most assuredly all hang separately.” He went on to play a significant role in the government and took on the responsibilities of president of the Pennsylvania constitutional convention.

But, within less than a year and a half after his return, the aged statesman set sail once again for Europe, beginning a career as diplomat that would occupy him for most of the rest of his life. In 1776–79, one of three commissioners, he directed the negotiations that led to treaties of commerce and alliance with France, where the people adulated him, but he and the other commissioners squabbled constantly. While he was sole commissioner to France (1779–85), he and John Jay and John Adams negotiated the Treaty of Paris (1783), which ended the War for Independence.

But, less than a year and a half after he returned, the older statesman set sail again for Europe, starting a diplomatic career that would take up most of the rest of his life. From 1776 to 1779, as one of three commissioners, he led the negotiations that resulted in treaties of commerce and alliance with France, where the people admired him, but he and the other commissioners always argued. While he was the sole commissioner to France from 1779 to 1785, he, John Jay, and John Adams negotiated the Treaty of Paris in 1783, which ended the War for Independence.

Back in the United States, in 1785–87 Franklin became president of the Supreme Executive Council of Pennsylvania. At the Constitutional Convention (May 1787), though he did not approve of many aspects of the finished document, he lent his prestige, soothed passions, and compromised disputes. In his twilight years, working on his Autobiography, he could look back on a fruitful life as the toast of two continents. Active nearly to the last, in 1787 he was elected as first president of the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery—a cause to which he had committed himself as early as the 1730’s. His final public act was signing a memorial to Congress recommending dissolution of the slavery system. Shortly thereafter, in 1790 at the age of 84, Franklin passed away in Philadelphia and was buried in Christ Church Burial Ground.

Back in the United States, from 1785 to 1787, Franklin was the president of the Supreme Executive Council of Pennsylvania. At the Constitutional Convention in May 1787, even though he didn’t agree with many parts of the finished document, he used his influence to calm tensions and help resolve conflicts. In his later years, while working on his Autobiography, he could reflect on a successful life that made him the toast of two continents. He remained active almost until the end; in 1787, he was elected as the first president of the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery—an issue he had dedicated himself to since the 1730s. His last public act was signing a memorial to Congress urging the abolition of the slavery system. Shortly after, in 1790, at the age of 84, Franklin passed away in Philadelphia and was buried in Christ Church Burial Ground.


59

59

Elbridge Gerry

MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS

During an extended and controversial career, Elbridge Gerry experienced many triumphs and disappointments. A prosperous merchant who worked alongside the two Adamses and John Hancock in the cause of independence, he integrated personal interests with public service and translated them into wartime profits. In the course of his long tenure in the Continental Congress, he signed both the Declaration and Articles of Confederation. But throughout his years in office, which crested in the U.S. Vice-Presidency, his inconsistencies, ambivalence, and truculence stirred up animosity among his colleagues—though he usually managed to muster enough party and popular support to win reelection.

Throughout his long and controversial career, Elbridge Gerry faced both successes and failures. As a successful merchant who worked with the two Adamses and John Hancock for independence, he mixed personal interests with public service and profited during wartime. During his extensive time in the Continental Congress, he signed both the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation. However, his years in office, which culminated in the U.S. Vice Presidency, were marked by inconsistencies, ambivalence, and aggressiveness that created tension among his colleagues—although he usually managed to secure enough support from his party and the public to get reelected.

Gerry was born in 1744 at Marblehead, Mass., the third of 12 children. His mother was the daughter of a Boston merchant; his father, a wealthy and politically active merchant-shipper who had once been a sea captain. Upon graduating from Harvard in 1762, Gerry joined his father and two brothers in the family business, which consisted of exporting dried codfish to Barbados and Spain. In 1772–74 he entered the colonial legislature, where he came under the influence of Samuel Adams, and took part in the Marblehead and Massachusetts committees of correspondence. In June of the latter year, when Parliament closed Boston Harbor and Marblehead became a major port of entry for supplies donated by patriots throughout the Colonies to relieve the Bostonians, he aided in the transshipment.

Gerry was born in 1744 in Marblehead, Massachusetts, as the third of 12 children. His mother was the daughter of a Boston merchant, and his father was a wealthy, politically active merchant-shipper who had once been a sea captain. After graduating from Harvard in 1762, Gerry joined his father and two brothers in the family business, which focused on exporting dried codfish to Barbados and Spain. From 1772 to 1774, he entered the colonial legislature, where he was influenced by Samuel Adams and participated in the Marblehead and Massachusetts committees of correspondence. In June of the latter year, when Parliament closed Boston Harbor and Marblehead became a major entry point for supplies donated by patriots from all over the Colonies to help the people of Boston, he assisted in the transshipment.

Between 1774 and 1776, Gerry attended the first and second60 provincial congresses; served with Samuel Adams and John Hancock on the council of safety, which prepared the colony for war; and, as chairman of the committee of supply, a job for which his merchant background ideally suited him, raised troops and dealt with military logistics. During the night of April 18, 1775, he barely eluded capture by the British troops marching on Lexington and Concord. Following the adjournment of a meeting of the council of safety at an inn in Menotomy (Arlington), on the road from Cambridge to Lexington, he had retired for the night but responded to the alarm and fled.

Between 1774 and 1776, Gerry participated in the first and second 60 provincial congresses; worked alongside Samuel Adams and John Hancock on the council of safety, which got the colony ready for war; and, as chairman of the committee of supply—perfect for his merchant background—raised troops and handled military logistics. On the night of April 18, 1775, he narrowly escaped being captured by British troops heading to Lexington and Concord. After a meeting of the council of safety at an inn in Menotomy (Arlington), while traveling from Cambridge to Lexington, he had gone to bed for the night but quickly responded to the alarm and fled.

Gerry entered the Continental Congress in 1776 and voted for independence in July, but his absence at the formal ceremonies on August 2 necessitated his signing the Declaration later in the year. His congressional specialties were military and financial matters, in both of which he demonstrated a duality of attitude that was to become his political trademark. He earned the nickname “soldiers’ friend” for his advocacy of better pay and equipment, yet he vacillated on the issue of pensions. Despite his disapproval of standing armies, he recommended long-term enlistments. Although mistrustful of military officials, he befriended both George Washington and Thomas Conway, two generals who were implacable enemies.

Gerry joined the Continental Congress in 1776 and voted for independence in July, but missing the formal ceremonies on August 2 meant he had to sign the Declaration later that year. His focus in Congress was on military and financial issues, where he showcased a mixed attitude that would become his political trademark. He earned the nickname “soldiers’ friend” for pushing for better pay and equipment, but he was inconsistent on the topic of pensions. Even though he didn’t approve of standing armies, he suggested long-term enlistments. While he was skeptical of military officials, he formed friendships with both George Washington and Thomas Conway, two generals who were fierce rivals.

Until 1779 Gerry sat on and sometimes presided over the congressional treasury board, which regulated Continental finances. An Army procurement agent as well as a merchant-supplier, he utilized information he obtained in Congress to benefit his lucrative business. On the other hand, he denounced profiteering and personally adhered to a fair-price schedule. In 1780, as wartime financial problems mounted, however, the Delegates resolved to revise the schedule. Gerry’s vehement objections led to a quarrel, and he stormed out of Congress. Although nominally a Member, he did not reappear for 3 years. During the interim, he engaged in trade and privateering and saw duty in the lower house of the State legislature.

Until 1779, Gerry sat on and sometimes chaired the congressional treasury board, which managed Continental finances. As both an Army procurement agent and a merchant-supplier, he used information he gathered in Congress to benefit his profitable business. However, he criticized profiteering and personally followed a fair-price schedule. In 1780, as wartime financial issues worsened, the Delegates decided to update the schedule. Gerry's strong objections led to an argument, and he stormed out of Congress. Though he was technically still a Member, he didn’t return for 3 years. During that time, he was involved in trade and privateering and served in the lower house of the State legislature.

Back in Congress in 1783–85, Gerry numbered among those Representatives who had possessed talent as Revolutionary agitators and wartime leaders but who could not effectually cope with the painstaking task of stabilizing the National Government. He was experienced and conscientious, but created many enemies with his lack of humor, suspicion of the motives of others, and obsessive fear of political and military tyranny. In 1786, the year after leaving Congress, his fortune well established, he retired from business, married,61 and took a seat in the State legislature. The next year, he moved from Marblehead to Cambridge and purchased a confiscated Loyalist estate, where he was to reside for the rest of his life.

Back in Congress from 1783 to 1785, Gerry was one of those Representatives who had shown talents as Revolutionary activists and wartime leaders but struggled to handle the tough job of stabilizing the National Government. He was experienced and dedicated, but his lack of humor, skepticism about others' motives, and constant fear of political and military oppression made him many enemies. In 1786, a year after leaving Congress and with his fortune secure, he retired from business, got married,61 and took a seat in the State legislature. The following year, he moved from Marblehead to Cambridge and bought a confiscated Loyalist estate, where he would live for the rest of his life.

Gerry was one of the most vocal of the delegates at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. He antagonized practically everyone by his inconsistency and, according to a colleague, “objected to everything he did not propose.” At first he advocated a strong Central Government, but ultimately rejected and refused to sign the Constitution, especially because it lacked a bill of rights and because he deemed it a threat to republicanism. He led the drive against ratification in Massachusetts. In 1789, when he changed his mind and announced his intention to support the Constitution, he was elected to the First Congress, where to the chagrin of the Antifederalists he championed Federalist policies.

Gerry was one of the most outspoken delegates at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. He annoyed almost everyone with his inconsistency and, as a colleague put it, “objected to everything he didn’t propose.” Initially, he supported a strong central government, but in the end, he rejected and refused to sign the Constitution, mainly because it didn't include a bill of rights and he saw it as a threat to republicanism. He led the opposition to ratification in Massachusetts. In 1789, when he changed his mind and decided to support the Constitution, he was elected to the First Congress, where, much to the dismay of the Antifederalists, he promoted Federalist policies.

Gerry left Congress for the last time in 1793 and retired for 4 years. During this time, he came to mistrust the aims of the Federalists, particularly their attempts to nurture an alliance with Britain, and sided with the pro-French Democratic-Republicans. In 1797 President John Adams appointed him as the only non-Federalist member of a three-man commission charged with negotiating a reconciliation with France, on the brink of war with the United States. During the ensuing XYZ affair (1797–98), Gerry tarnished his reputation. The French foreign minister duped him into believing that his presence in France would prevent war, and he lingered on long after the departure of the other disgusted commissioners. Finally, the embarrassed Adams recalled him, amid Federalist vituperation.

Gerry left Congress for the last time in 1793 and took a 4-year break. During this time, he grew skeptical of the Federalists' goals, especially their efforts to build an alliance with Britain, and aligned himself with the pro-French Democratic-Republicans. In 1797, President John Adams appointed him as the only non-Federalist on a three-person commission tasked with negotiating peace with France, which was on the verge of war with the United States. During the subsequent XYZ affair (1797–98), Gerry damaged his reputation. The French foreign minister misled him into thinking that his presence in France would prevent war, and he stayed much longer than the other frustrated commissioners. Eventually, the embarrassed Adams recalled him, facing criticism from the Federalists.

In 1800–03 Gerry, never very popular among the Massachusetts electorate because of his aristocratic haughtiness, met defeat in four bids for the Massachusetts governorship, but finally triumphed in 1810–12. Near the end of his two terms, scarred by partisan controversy, the Democratic-Republicans passed a devious redistricting measure to insure their domination of the State senate. In response, the Federalists heaped ridicule on Gerry and punningly coined the term “gerrymander” to describe the salamander-like shape of one of the redistricted areas.

In 1800–03, Gerry, who was never very popular with the voters in Massachusetts due to his aristocratic arrogance, lost four attempts to become governor. However, he finally succeeded in 1810–12. Toward the end of his two terms, battered by political controversy, the Democratic-Republicans pushed through a shady redistricting plan to ensure their control over the State Senate. In response, the Federalists mocked Gerry and cleverly came up with the term “gerrymander” to describe the salamander-like shape of one of the newly drawn districts.

Despite his advanced age, frail health, and the threat of poverty brought on by neglect of personal affairs, in 1813 Gerry accepted the Vice-Presidency in James Madison’s Democratic-Republican administration.62 In the fall of 1814, the 70-year-old politician was stricken fatally while on the way to the Senate. He left his wife, who was to live until 1849, the last surviving widow of a signer, as well as three sons and four daughters. Gerry is buried in Congressional Cemetery at Washington, D.C.

Despite his old age, poor health, and the risk of poverty due to neglecting his personal affairs, in 1813 Gerry accepted the Vice-Presidency in James Madison’s Democratic-Republican administration.62 In the fall of 1814, the 70-year-old politician was fatally struck down while heading to the Senate. He left behind his wife, who would live until 1849, as the last surviving widow of a signer, along with three sons and four daughters. Gerry is buried in Congressional Cemetery in Washington, D.C.


Button Gwinnett

GEORGIA

GEORGIA

Tempestuousness and ill-fortune marked the destiny of uniquely named Button Gwinnett, whose forename is that of a branch of his mother’s family. The second signer to die, he met a tragic end in a duel while only in his forties. The only highlight of his brief tour in the Continental Congress was signing the Declaration. Even in Georgia, where he rose to the acting governorship, controversy and failure usually dogged him. Financial misfortunes were continual distractions, and he found that his paltry rewards as a merchant and planter matched his disappointments in politics.

Button Gwinnett, with his uniquely chosen name from his mother’s family line, had a life filled with turbulence and bad luck. He was the second signer of the Declaration to die, tragically ending his life in a duel before he reached forty. His only notable achievement in the Continental Congress was signing the Declaration. Even in Georgia, where he served as acting governor, he was often surrounded by controversy and failure. Financial difficulties were a constant distraction, and his modest success as a merchant and planter reflected his political disappointments.

Gwinnett was likely born in 1735, at the village of Down Hatherly, Gloucestershire, England. The second male in a family numbering at least seven, he was the son of an Anglican vicar of Welsh ancestry and a mother with English ties. He probably learned trade and finance from an uncle, a Bristol merchant, and in 1757 moved to Wolverhampton, Staffordshire. He married a grocer’s daughter, who was to bear three girls, and for a time he joined her father in a partnership. In 1759, however, Gwinnett entered the export shipping business and built up an extensive trade with the American Colonies, possibly sometimes visiting them himself.

Gwinnett was likely born in 1735 in the village of Down Hatherly, Gloucestershire, England. He was the second son in a family of at least seven children, the son of an Anglican vicar of Welsh descent and a mother with English heritage. He probably learned about trade and finance from an uncle who was a merchant in Bristol, and in 1757, he moved to Wolverhampton, Staffordshire. He married the daughter of a grocer, with whom he had three daughters, and for a while, he was in a partnership with her father. In 1759, however, Gwinnett got into the export shipping business and developed a significant trade with the American Colonies, possibly even visiting them himself at times.

63 The date of Gwinnett’s emigration to Savannah, Ga., is not known but in 1765 he purchased a store there. Later that same year, for some reason, he sold it and abruptly switched vocation. Apparently dazzled by visions of a planter’s life on a great estate but undeterred by his lack of capital, experience, and training, he borrowed £3,000 and purchased large St. Catherine’s Island. It was located off the Georgia coast not far from the busy mainland port of Sunbury, a rival of Savannah. At this time, he probably erected a home on the island. Before long, though already deep in debt, he also purchased some coastal lands on credit and received grants of others from the colony; and bought large numbers of slaves to work his holdings. Poachers aggravated his problems by raiding the island’s livestock.

63 The exact date Gwinnett moved to Savannah, Ga., is unknown, but in 1765, he bought a store there. Later that same year, for some reason, he sold it and suddenly changed careers. Clearly captivated by dreams of being a plantation owner on a big estate but undeterred by his lack of money, experience, and training, he borrowed £3,000 and bought large St. Catherine’s Island. It was off the Georgia coast, not far from the busy mainland port of Sunbury, which was a competitor of Savannah. At this time, he likely built a home on the island. However, even though he was already heavily in debt, he also bought some coastal lands on credit and received grants for others from the colony, as well as purchased a large number of slaves to work his properties. Poachers made his situation worse by stealing the island’s livestock.

Fanciful depiction of Button Gwinnett’s duel with Gen. Lachlan McIntosh in 1777 that resulted in the former’s death.

Gwinnett’s land, slaves, and other possessions were soon gobbled up by creditors. Finally, in 1773, they took over the island, but allowed Gwinnett to maintain his home there. He did so for the rest64 of his life. During the war, however, the approach of British vessels, who replenished their food supplies from the livestock on the exposed island, sometimes forced him and his family to scurry over in their boat to Sunbury for temporary refuge.

Gwinnett’s land, slaves, and other belongings were quickly taken by creditors. Eventually, in 1773, they seized the island but let Gwinnett keep his home there. He lived there for the rest64 of his life. However, during the war, the arrival of British ships, which restocked their food supplies using the livestock on the vulnerable island, occasionally compelled him and his family to hurriedly cross over to Sunbury for temporary shelter.

Meantime, Gwinnett had long since entered politics. In 1768–69 he had been designated as one of His Majesty’s justices of the peace and as a local pilotage commissioner. In the years 1769–71 the voters of St. John’s Parish elected him to the colonial assembly at Savannah, but he attended only spasmodically because of his financial woes. When they worsened, he left public office for 5 years.

Meantime, Gwinnett had already gotten into politics. In 1768–69, he was appointed as one of the King’s justices of the peace and as a local pilotage commissioner. From 1769 to 1771, the voters of St. John’s Parish elected him to the colonial assembly in Savannah, but he attended only sporadically due to his financial struggles. When his situation worsened, he stepped away from public office for five years.

Gwinnett returned on the national level. Unlike the other two Georgia signers, Lyman Hall and George Walton, he belatedly joined the patriot side—apparently held back for some time by his English birth and close family connections in England. His friend Hall, a Sunbury resident and fellow member of the Midway Congregational Church, swung him over, probably beginning in the summer of 1775. The next February, the provincial congress named Gwinnett to the Continental Congress, though he did not arrive in Philadelphia until May. He attended for only about 10 weeks. Right after he signed the Declaration on August 2, he trekked back to Georgia, where he hoped but failed to win at least an Army colonelcy in one of the units the State was forming.

Gwinnett made a comeback on the national scene. Unlike the other two Georgia signers, Lyman Hall and George Walton, he joined the patriot side later than them—apparently delayed for some time due to his English birth and strong family ties in England. His friend Hall, who lived in Sunbury and was also part of the Midway Congregational Church, probably convinced him starting in the summer of 1775. The following February, the provincial congress appointed Gwinnett to the Continental Congress, though he didn’t reach Philadelphia until May. He was there for only about 10 weeks. After signing the Declaration on August 2, he returned to Georgia, where he hoped to secure a colonel position in one of the units the State was forming, but he was unsuccessful.

In October Gwinnett was reelected to the Continental Congress, but chose not to attend. Instead, during the next 5 months, he played a key role in drafting the State’s first constitution, in the course of which he helped thwart a proposed union of South Carolina and Georgia. Upon the death of the Governor, or president of the Executive Council, in March 1777 the council commissioned Gwinnett as Acting Governor for 2 months, but he failed to achieve reelection. Before leaving office, he had clashed with controversial Gen. Lachlan McIntosh, an old rival. The result was a pistol duel in May just outside Savannah. Both men suffered wounds, but Gwinnett died a few days later of a gangrenous infection in his leg. Colonial Park Cemetery in Savannah contains a grave reputed to be his.

In October, Gwinnett was reelected to the Continental Congress but decided not to attend. Instead, over the next five months, he was instrumental in drafting the state’s first constitution, during which he helped prevent a proposed union between South Carolina and Georgia. After the death of the governor, or president of the Executive Council, in March 1777, the council appointed Gwinnett as Acting Governor for two months, but he was unable to secure reelection. Before leaving office, he had a conflict with the controversial General Lachlan McIntosh, an old rival. This led to a pistol duel in May just outside Savannah. Both men were wounded, but Gwinnett died a few days later from a gangrenous infection in his leg. Colonial Park Cemetery in Savannah has a grave that is believed to be his.


65

65

Lyman Hall

GEORGIA

GEORGIA

Lyman Hall was one of the four signers originally trained as ministers. He eventually found his pulpit in politics, though he had to preach vigorously to inspire the “congregation” of Georgia. He enthusiastically sparked the slow-developing independence movement there with George Walton and recruited Button Gwinnett, the third Georgia signer. Somehow Hall also managed to pursue careers as doctor, planter, and Governor.

Lyman Hall was one of the four signers who were originally trained as ministers. He ultimately discovered his passion in politics, but he had to put in a lot of effort to motivate the “congregation” of Georgia. He passionately fueled the emerging independence movement there alongside George Walton and included Button Gwinnett, the third signer from Georgia. Somehow, Hall also managed to have careers as a doctor, planter, and Governor.

A native of Wallingford, Conn., Hall was born in 1724. He graduated from Yale College in 1747 at the age of 23, returned home, and heeded a family call to the Congregational ministry. An uncle, Rev. Samuel Hall, trained him in theology. In 1749 he began preaching in Bridgeport and adjacent towns. Young and immature, he probably entrapped himself in the middle of a liberal-conservative schism and in some way alienated his congregation, but repentance brought quick reinstatement from dismissal in 1751, and for a couple of years he temporarily filled vacant pulpits.

A native of Wallingford, Conn., Hall was born in 1724. He graduated from Yale College in 1747 at the age of 23, returned home, and answered a family call to the Congregational ministry. An uncle, Rev. Samuel Hall, taught him theology. In 1749, he started preaching in Bridgeport and nearby towns. Young and inexperienced, he likely found himself caught in the middle of a liberal-conservative divide and somehow distanced himself from his congregation, but he quickly regained their trust after showing remorse following his dismissal in 1751, and for a few years, he temporarily filled vacant pulpits.

During this period, in 1752, Hall married, but his wife lived only a year; about 2 years later he remarried, a union that was to bring forth a son. Meantime, Hall had become disillusioned by his ministerial experiences. He studied medicine with a local doctor, partially supporting himself by teaching. When his medical training was completed, he moved back to Wallingford and hung out his shingle.

During this time, in 1752, Hall got married, but his wife only lived for a year; about two years later, he remarried, and this union produced a son. Meanwhile, Hall became disheartened by his experiences as a minister. He studied medicine with a local doctor and partially supported himself by teaching. Once he finished his medical training, he moved back to Wallingford and set up his practice.

In 1757 the 33-year-old Hall, seeking brighter fields, emigrated to Dorchester, S.C., a settlement of New England Puritans not far from Charleston. Within a few months, he joined some of the residents in a relocation that had been underway since 1752. They were66 pushing southward to Georgia’s coastal Midway District, in St. John’s Parish (present Liberty County). This area provided more land and a healthier climate.

In 1757, 33-year-old Hall moved to Dorchester, S.C., a community of New England Puritans near Charleston, searching for better opportunities. Within a few months, he joined some of the locals in a move that had started back in 1752. They were66 heading south to Georgia’s coastal Midway District, in St. John’s Parish (now Liberty County). This region offered more land and a healthier climate.

In 1758 the colonists finished their emigration and founded Sunbury. It evolved into the thriving seaport-hub of the surrounding slave-based, rice-indigo economy. Like many other planters, Hall maintained a home there, where it was healthier than inland, as well as at Hall’s Knoll, the plantation just north of the present town of Midway that he had purchased shortly after arriving in the area. Because its plantations skirted malarial swamps, Hall kept busy providing medical treatment, as well as managing his estate.

In 1758, the colonists completed their move and established Sunbury. It developed into a bustling seaport that supported the surrounding slave-based rice and indigo economy. Like many other planters, Hall had a home there, which was healthier than inland, as well as at Hall’s Knoll, the plantation he bought just north of what is now Midway shortly after arriving in the area. Because the plantations were near malarial swamps, Hall was occupied with providing medical care and managing his estate.

St. John’s Parish became the wealthiest in Georgia. This was not its only uniqueness, for the populace was steeped in the New England tradition of independence. When the trouble with Britain erupted in the mid-1760’s the parish, guided by Hall, stood apart in its opposition from virtually all the rest of the colony except for another cluster of Revolutionaries at Savannah led by George Walton and others. Georgia, which was to be the last of the Colonies to join the Continental Association, was the youngest, most remote, and most sparsely settled. Also the poorest, it felt less the impact of British economic restrictions. The Loyalist ruling aristocracy of Georgia, regarding the tiny band of Revolutionaries with contempt, resisted their every move.

St. John’s Parish became the richest in Georgia. But that wasn’t its only distinction; the people were deeply rooted in the New England tradition of independence. When tensions with Britain flared up in the mid-1760s, the parish, under Hall's leadership, stood out in its opposition compared to almost everyone else in the colony, except for another group of Revolutionaries in Savannah led by George Walton and others. Georgia, which would be the last of the colonies to join the Continental Association, was the youngest, most isolated, and most sparsely populated. Also the poorest, it felt less of the impact from British economic restrictions. The Loyalist ruling elite in Georgia looked down on the small group of Revolutionaries and fought against their every effort.

Hall was appalled by the poor representation of the parishes as a whole and the indecisiveness of Revolutionary conventions he attended at Savannah in the summer of 1774 and the next January, especially by their failure to send Delegates to the Continental Congress. He dejectedly returned to St. John’s Parish. It was ready to secede from the colony, and proposed an alliance to South Carolina, which refused. Not to be denied, in March 1775 the parish held its own convention and sent Hall as its own “delegate” to the Continental Congress.

Hall was shocked by the inadequate representation of the parishes as a whole and the indecisiveness of the Revolutionary conventions he attended in Savannah during the summer of 1774 and the following January, particularly their failure to send Delegates to the Continental Congress. He sadly returned to St. John’s Parish. It was poised to break away from the colony and proposed an alliance with South Carolina, which rejected the offer. Unfazed, in March 1775, the parish held its own convention and sent Hall as its own “delegate” to the Continental Congress.

Two months later, Congress admitted Hall as a nonvoting member. In July, Georgia, finally coming into the fold, sanctioned Hall’s presence in Congress and appointed four other Delegates. Hall served until 1780. Two years earlier, he had moved his family somewhere to the north just before British troops ravaged and conquered the Georgia coast. In the process, they destroyed Hall’s Knoll and Hall’s Sunbury residence and confiscated his property.

Two months later, Congress welcomed Hall as a nonvoting member. In July, Georgia, finally on board, approved Hall’s presence in Congress and appointed four other delegates. Hall served until 1780. Two years earlier, he had moved his family a bit north right before British troops devastated and took over the Georgia coast. During this, they destroyed Hall’s Knoll and his Sunbury home and seized his property.

67 When the British evacuated Savannah in 1782, Hall settled there and resumed his medical practice to mend his fortune. The next January, St. John’s Parish, where he had maintained ties, elected him to the State legislature. That body, in turn, awarded him the governorship (1783–84). His reconstruction-oriented administration, though marred by his purchase of and speculation in lands confiscated from Loyalists, rehabilitated the wartorn State and laid foundations for future growth.

67 When the British left Savannah in 1782, Hall moved there and restarted his medical practice to improve his finances. The following January, St. John’s Parish, where he had kept connections, chose him for the State legislature. That group, in turn, named him governor (1783–84). His administration, which focused on reconstruction, was somewhat tainted by his buying and speculating on lands taken from Loyalists, but it helped rebuild the war-torn state and established a foundation for future growth.

In Hall’s final years he acted for a time as a judge of the inferior court of Chatham County and as a trustee of a proposed State university (to be called first Franklin College and later the University of Georgia). But his duties as executor of Button Gwinnett’s tangled estate required years of legal wrangling. In 1785 he sold his Hall’s Knoll land. Five years later, he moved from Savannah to Burke County and purchased Shell Bluff Plantation, on the Savannah River about 25 miles below Augusta. A few months hence he died and was buried there. His remains are now interred at the Signers’ Monument in Augusta.

In Hall's later years, he served for a time as a judge of the lower court in Chatham County and as a trustee for a proposed state university (initially named Franklin College and later the University of Georgia). However, his role as executor of Button Gwinnett’s complicated estate demanded years of legal disputes. In 1785, he sold his Hall’s Knoll land. Five years later, he relocated from Savannah to Burke County and bought Shell Bluff Plantation, located on the Savannah River about 25 miles south of Augusta. A few months later, he passed away and was buried there. His remains are now interred at the Signers’ Monument in Augusta.

68

68


John Hancock

MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS

One of the fathers of U.S. independence, John Hancock helped spearhead the pivotal revolt in Massachusetts, presided as President of Congress during the voting for independence and adoption of the Declaration, and boldly penned the first signature on the document. Subsequently he served as the first and longtime Governor of his Commonwealth. Despite all these achievements and the persistent loyalty of his constituents, whom he wooed with lavish expenditures for public projects, his vanity, ostentation, and regal way of life irked many of his professional associates.

John Hancock, one of the key figures in U.S. independence, played an important role in the major uprising in Massachusetts. He was the President of Congress during the vote for independence and the adoption of the Declaration, and he famously signed his name first on the document. Later, he became the first and long-serving Governor of his Commonwealth. Despite his many achievements and the ongoing support of his constituents—won over by his generous spending on public projects—his vanity, flamboyance, and lavish lifestyle frustrated many of his colleagues.

Hancock, born in 1737 at Braintree (present Quincy), Mass., lost his father, a Congregational pastor, at the age of 7. He spent the next 6 years with his grandparents at Lexington before joining his guardian, Thomas Hancock, a childless uncle who was one of the richest merchant-shippers in Boston. After studying at Boston Latin School and graduating from Harvard College in 1754, John began working as a clerk in his uncle’s business and learned it rapidly. In 1760–61, while visiting London to observe the English side of the business, he attended the funeral of George II and the coronation of George III, who apparently granted him an audience. In 1763 he became a partner of his uncle, who died the next year and willed him the firm, a fortune that was probably the greatest in New England, and a luxurious house on Beacon Street.

Hancock, born in 1737 in Braintree (now Quincy), Massachusetts, lost his father, a Congregational pastor, when he was 7. He spent the next 6 years living with his grandparents in Lexington before moving in with his guardian, Thomas Hancock, a childless uncle who was one of the richest merchant-shippers in Boston. After attending Boston Latin School and graduating from Harvard College in 1754, John started working as a clerk in his uncle’s business and quickly learned the ropes. In 1760–61, while visiting London to see the English side of the business, he attended the funeral of George II and the coronation of George III, who reportedly granted him an audience. In 1763, he became a partner in his uncle's business, which his uncle left to him when he died the following year, along with a fortune that was likely the largest in New England and a luxurious house on Beacon Street.

Hancock allied with other merchants in protesting the Stamp Act (1765), and the next year inaugurated a long legislative career. But he did not strongly identify with the patriots until 2 years later. At that time, British customs officials, their courage bolstered by the arrival of a warship in Boston Harbor, charged him with smuggling and seized one of his ships. During the ensuing riots, the terrified customs officials fled to an island in the harbor. A few months later, the first major contingent of British troops sailed into port and created a tense situation that resulted in the Boston Massacre (1770). John Adams ably defended Hancock in court until the British dropped the smuggling charge, but the episode made him a hero throughout the Colonies.

Hancock teamed up with other merchants to protest the Stamp Act (1765), and the following year began a long career in politics. However, he didn’t really connect with the patriots until two years later. At that point, British customs officials, feeling emboldened by the arrival of a warship in Boston Harbor, accused him of smuggling and confiscated one of his ships. During the riots that followed, the frightened customs officials escaped to an island in the harbor. A few months later, the first large group of British troops arrived in the port, creating a tense situation that ultimately led to the Boston Massacre (1770). John Adams successfully defended Hancock in court until the British dropped the smuggling charge, but this incident made him a hero across the Colonies.

Other factors tied Hancock to the patriots. Samuel and John Adams, shrewdly perceiving the advantages of such a rich and well-known affiliate, welcomed him into their ranks, encouraged his idolatry by the populace, and pushed him upward in the Revolutionary hierarchy. When the first provincial congress met at Salem and Concord in 1774, he acted as its president as well as chairman of the vital council of safety. The second provincial congress, convening the next year at Cambridge and Concord, elected him to the Continental Congress.

Other factors connected Hancock to the patriots. Samuel and John Adams, recognizing the benefits of having such a wealthy and prominent ally, welcomed him into their group, supported his popularity among the public, and helped elevate his status in the Revolutionary hierarchy. When the first provincial congress met in Salem and Concord in 1774, he served as its president and as chairman of the crucial council of safety. The second provincial congress, which met the following year in Cambridge and Concord, chose him to represent them in the Continental Congress.

On April 18, only 3 days after the provincial congress adjourned, British troops marched from Boston to seize rebel stores at Concord. Warned of their approach during the night by Paul Revere, Hancock and Samuel Adams, who were visiting at nearby Lexington, escaped. But the British-American clashes at Lexington and Concord marked69 the outbreak of war. The two men avoided Boston and hid at various places for 2 weeks before proceeding to Philadelphia. Later that summer, Hancock married, siring a daughter who died in infancy and a son, John George Washington Hancock, who lived but 9 years.

On April 18, just 3 days after the provincial congress finished, British troops marched from Boston to take rebel supplies at Concord. Paul Revere warned Hancock and Samuel Adams, who were visiting nearby Lexington, about their approach during the night, allowing them to escape. However, the conflicts between the British and Americans at Lexington and Concord marked the start of the war. The two men avoided Boston and hid in various locations for 2 weeks before heading to Philadelphia. Later that summer, Hancock got married and had a daughter who died as an infant and a son, John George Washington Hancock, who lived only 9 years.

From 1775 until 1777 Hancock presided over the Continental Congress. The very first year, his egotism, which regularly aroused the antipathy of many Members, created personal embitterment as well. Blind to his own limitations, particularly his lack of military experience, he unrealistically entertained the hope that he, instead of Washington, would be appointed as commander in chief of the Continental Army. Hancock also provoked ill will among his fellow New Englanders, especially Samuel Adams, by courting moderates such as John Dickinson and Benjamin Harrison. Hancock believed that Samuel Adams was responsible in 1777 for blocking a congressional vote of thanks for his services and never forgave him.

From 1775 until 1777, Hancock led the Continental Congress. In his first year, his ego often created tension with many members and caused personal bitterness as well. He was unaware of his own limitations, especially his lack of military experience, and foolishly hoped that he, rather than Washington, would be appointed commander in chief of the Continental Army. Hancock also stirred resentment among his fellow New Englanders, particularly Samuel Adams, by seeking the support of moderates like John Dickinson and Benjamin Harrison. Hancock believed that Samuel Adams was the one who, in 1777, blocked a congressional vote of thanks for his services and he never forgave him.

Only Hancock and Charles Thomson, the President and Secretary of Congress, signed the broadside copy of the Declaration, printed the night of its adoption, July 4, 1776, and disseminated to the public the following day. At the formal signing of the parchment copy on August 2, tradition holds that Hancock wrote his name in large letters so that the King would not need spectacles to recognize him as a “traitor.” After resigning as presiding officer in 1777, he remained a Member of Congress until 1780, though he spent much of his time in Boston and for the rest of his life solidified his political position in Massachusetts. In 1778, as a major general in the militia, he commanded an expedition that failed to recapture Newport, R.I., from the British. He made a more tangible contribution to the war by accepting Continental currency from his debtors, even though his fortune had already been dented by wartime-induced reverses.

Only Hancock and Charles Thomson, the President and Secretary of Congress, signed the broadside copy of the Declaration, which was printed the night it was adopted, July 4, 1776, and shared with the public the next day. During the formal signing of the parchment copy on August 2, tradition says that Hancock wrote his name in large letters so that the King wouldn't need glasses to recognize him as a “traitor.” After stepping down as the presiding officer in 1777, he kept serving as a Member of Congress until 1780, although he spent much of his time in Boston and solidified his political standing in Massachusetts for the rest of his life. In 1778, as a major general in the militia, he led an expedition that failed to reclaim Newport, R.I., from the British. He made a more direct contribution to the war by accepting Continental currency from his debtors, despite the fact that his wealth had already taken a hit due to the war.

In 1780, the same year Hancock gave up his seat in Congress and attended his Commonwealth’s constitutional convention, he was overwhelmingly elected as first Governor (1780–85). He won reelection in 1787–93. In the interim (1785–86), he once again sat in Congress. In 1788 he chaired the Massachusetts convention that ratified the U.S. Constitution, which he favored.

In 1780, the same year Hancock stepped down from his position in Congress and attended his state's constitutional convention, he was overwhelmingly elected as the first Governor (1780–85). He won reelection in 1787–93. In between (1785–86), he once again served in Congress. In 1788, he chaired the Massachusetts convention that ratified the U.S. Constitution, which he supported.

While still Governor, in 1793 at the age of 56, Hancock died at Boston. His funeral, one of the most impressive ever held in New England, culminated in burial at Old Granary Burying Ground.

While still Governor, in 1793 at the age of 56, Hancock died in Boston. His funeral, one of the most impressive ever held in New England, ended with burial at Old Granary Burying Ground.


70

70

Benjamin Harrison

VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA

Benjamin Harrison, the most conservative of the Virginia signers except for Carter Braxton, was a member of one of the most prominent planter families in the South and was the fifth in a line of active politicians bearing the same name. Because of his rotundity, joviality, love of good foods and wines, and fondness for luxury, he acquired the nickname “Falstaff of Congress.” His son, William Henry, and his great-grandson, Benjamin, served as the ninth and 23d Presidents of the United States.

Benjamin Harrison, the most conservative of the Virginia signers except for Carter Braxton, came from one of the prominent planter families in the South and was the fifth in a line of active politicians with the same name. Known for his round figure, cheerful personality, love of good food and wine, and appreciation for luxury, he earned the nickname “Falstaff of Congress.” His son, William Henry, and his great-grandson, Benjamin, later served as the ninth and 23rd Presidents of the United States.

Harrison was born in 1726 at his father’s estate, Berkeley, in Charles City County, Va. He matriculated at the College of William and Mary, but left before graduating in 1745 upon the death of his father in order to assume management of the family plantation. Shortly thereafter he married; seven of his children were to survive infancy. In time, his landholdings grew to include eight plantations and other properties, and he also expanded into shipping and shipbuilding. Following the precedent set by his forebears, about 1749 he gained admission to the House of Burgesses. He sat there, frequently as speaker, until 1774, when the Royal Governor disbanded the body.

Harrison was born in 1726 at his father’s estate, Berkeley, in Charles City County, Virginia. He enrolled at the College of William and Mary but left before graduating in 1745 after his father passed away to take over the management of the family plantation. Soon after, he got married, and seven of his children would survive infancy. Over time, his landholdings expanded to include eight plantations and other properties, and he also ventured into shipping and shipbuilding. Following in the footsteps of his predecessors, around 1749 he was admitted to the House of Burgesses. He served there, often as speaker, until 1774, when the Royal Governor disbanded the assembly.

Harrison’s conservatism manifested itself early in the Revolutionary movement. In 1764 the burgesses, learning about the Stamp Act, impending in Parliament, named a committee to draw up a protest. As one of the committeemen, Harrison helped pen the document. The very next year, however, when the act went into effect, he refused to endorse Patrick Henry’s resolutions urging civil disobedience as a countermeasure. Forced to take a stand as the rift with the Crown widened, Harrison cast his lot with the patriots. Between 1773 and 1776, he shared in the tasks of the Revolutionary conventions, the committee of correspondence, and the provincial congresses.

Harrison's conservatism showed itself early in the Revolutionary movement. In 1764, when the burgesses learned about the Stamp Act that was about to be passed in Parliament, they created a committee to write a protest. As a member of that committee, Harrison helped write the document. However, the next year, when the act took effect, he refused to support Patrick Henry's resolutions calling for civil disobedience as a response. When he had to take a stand as the divide with the Crown grew, Harrison aligned himself with the patriots. Between 1773 and 1776, he participated in the work of the Revolutionary conventions, the committee of correspondence, and the provincial congresses.

Meantime, in 1774, Harrison had been appointed to the First71 Continental Congress. Although usually silent on the floor, he made valuable contributions on the foreign affairs, marine, military, and financial committees. As chairman of the committee of the whole (1776–77), he chaired the deliberations leading up to the adoption of the Declaration and the early debates on the proposed Articles of Confederation.

Meantime, in 1774, Harrison was appointed to the First71 Continental Congress. Although he usually stayed quiet during discussions, he made important contributions on the foreign affairs, marine, military, and financial committees. As chair of the committee of the whole (1776–77), he led the discussions that resulted in the adoption of the Declaration and the early debates about the proposed Articles of Confederation.

In 1777, the same year Harrison withdrew from Congress, he entered the lower house of the Virginia legislature, where he presided as speaker in the years 1778–81. His three terms as Governor (1781–84) reflected the ascendancy in Virginia of the conservatives, who included in addition to Harrison and Braxton such former extremists as Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee. Succeeded by Henry, Harrison rejoined the legislature (1784–91), holding the speakership part of the time. In 1788 at the Virginia ratifying convention he objected to the Federal Constitution because it lacked a bill of rights. Once ratification had occurred, however, he supported the new Government. Three years later, Harrison died in his mid-sixties at Berkeley and was buried there in the family cemetery.

In 1777, the same year Harrison stepped away from Congress, he joined the lower house of the Virginia legislature, where he served as speaker from 1778 to 1781. His three terms as Governor (1781–84) marked a rise in influence for the conservatives in Virginia, which included Harrison, Braxton, and former extremists like Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee. After being succeeded by Henry, Harrison returned to the legislature (1784–91), taking on the speaker role at times. In 1788, at the Virginia ratifying convention, he raised concerns about the Federal Constitution for not including a bill of rights. However, once ratification was achieved, he supported the new Government. Three years later, Harrison passed away in his mid-sixties at Berkeley and was buried in the family cemetery there.

72

72


John Hart

NEW JERSEY

NEW JERSEY

Signing the Declaration represented John Hart’s one significant act during an ephemeral tour in the Continental Congress, his only role in national politics. Yet, like most of the signers, he was dominant in community and State affairs. And he and his family directly experienced the tragedy of the war. Unfortunately, he died before the attainment of victory.

Signing the Declaration was John Hart’s main contribution during his short time in the Continental Congress, marking his only participation in national politics. However, similar to many other signers, he was highly influential in local and state matters. He and his family faced the challenges brought on by the war. Unfortunately, he died before the victory was won.

The year after Hart’s birth in 1711 at Stonington, Conn., his parents emigrated to New Jersey and settled on a farm in the Hopewell vicinity. Hart was to live there and till the soil all his life. In 1740 he married and began raising a family of 13. In time, while gaining the sobriquet “Honest John,” he acquired considerable property, including grist, saw, and fulling mills, and emerged as a civic leader. From the 1750’s until the outbreak of the War for Independence in 1775, despite a paucity of education, he worked his way up the political ladder in Hunterdon County and the State. He held the offices of justice of the peace, county judge, colonial legislator (1761–71), and judge of the New Jersey court of common pleas.

The year after Hart was born in 1711 in Stonington, Conn., his parents moved to New Jersey and settled on a farm near Hopewell. Hart lived there and farmed the land for the rest of his life. In 1740, he got married and started a family of 13. Over time, he earned the nickname “Honest John” and acquired a significant amount of property, including grist, saw, and fulling mills, becoming a community leader. From the 1750s until the start of the War for Independence in 1775, despite having limited education, he climbed the political ranks in Hunterdon County and the state. He served as a justice of the peace, county judge, colonial legislator (1761–71), and judge of the New Jersey court of common pleas.

In the legislature’s dispute with the Royal Governor, Hart opposed parliamentary taxation and the stationing of British troops in the colony. During the years 1774–76, he attended the New Jersey provincial congresses, where he achieved the vice-presidency, and won appointment to the council of safety and the committee of correspondence. In June 1776 he and four other Delegates were chosen to replace the incumbent conservatives in the Continental Congress. The new delegation arrived at Philadelphia just a few days before the votes for independence on July 1 and 2 and cast affirmative ballots.

In the legislature's conflict with the Royal Governor, Hart opposed parliamentary taxation and the presence of British troops in the colony. During the years 1774–76, he participated in the New Jersey provincial congresses, where he became the vice-president and was appointed to the council of safety and the committee of correspondence. In June 1776, he and four other delegates were selected to replace the current conservatives in the Continental Congress. The new delegation arrived in Philadelphia just a few days before the votes for independence on July 1 and 2 and voted in favor.

In August 1776, just after Hart signed the Declaration, he departed to accept the speakership in the lower house of the New Jersey legislature. That winter, during the British invasion of the province, the redcoats wreaked havoc on his farm and mills and drove him into hiding among the hills surrounding the Sourland Mountains. When he ended his exile in the wake of the American victories at Princeton and Trenton, he discovered that his wife, ill at the time of the attack, had died and his family scattered. In 1777–78 he sat again on the council of safety, but failing health forced his retirement. He died the next year, at the age of 69, on his Hopewell farm. He is buried in the yard of the First Baptist Church at Hopewell.

In August 1776, right after Hart signed the Declaration, he left to become the speaker of the lower house of the New Jersey legislature. That winter, during the British invasion of the area, the Redcoats caused a lot of destruction on his farm and mills, forcing him to hide in the hills around the Sourland Mountains. When he came out of hiding after the American victories at Princeton and Trenton, he found that his wife, who had been ill during the attack, had died and his family was scattered. In 1777–78, he served again on the council of safety, but his declining health led to his retirement. He passed away the following year at the age of 69 on his Hopewell farm. He is buried in the yard of the First Baptist Church at Hopewell.


73

73

Joseph Hewes

NORTH CAROLINA

N.C.

Even in an age and land of such unlimited opportunities as 18th-century America, few men attained such success as merchant Joseph Hewes. He was rarely thwarted in his ambitions and enjoyed wealth and social prestige, reflected in political conservatism.

Even in a time and place with so many opportunities like 18th-century America, few people attained the level of success that merchant Joseph Hewes did. He was rarely hindered in his ambitions and enjoyed both wealth and social status, which was reflected in his political conservatism.

Born in 1730 at Maybury Hill, an estate on the outskirts of Princeton, N.J., Hewes was the son of a pious and well-to-do Quaker farmer. He received a strict religious upbringing, and studied at a local school. After learning trade from a Philadelphia merchant, he entered business for himself. About 1760, anxious to expand his modest fortune, he moved to the thriving seaport town of Edenton, N.C. There, where he was to reside for the rest of his life, he founded a profitable mercantile and shipping firm and gained prominence. Only one fateful event marred his life. A few days before his intended wedding date, his fiancée suddenly died. Hewes remained a bachelor for the rest of his life.

Born in 1730 at Maybury Hill, an estate on the outskirts of Princeton, N.J., Hewes was the son of a devout and well-off Quaker farmer. He had a strict religious upbringing and attended a local school. After learning the trade from a Philadelphia merchant, he started his own business. Around 1760, eager to grow his modest wealth, he moved to the bustling seaport town of Edenton, N.C. There, where he would live for the rest of his life, he established a successful mercantile and shipping company and gained recognition. Only one significant event disrupted his life. A few days before his planned wedding, his fiancée unexpectedly passed away. Hewes remained single for the rest of his life.

As a member of the North Carolina assembly (1766–75), the committee of correspondence (1773), and the provincial assemblies (1774–75), Hewes helped the Whigs overthrow the royal government. Elected to the Continental Congress in 1774, he vigorously supported nonimportation measures even though it meant personal financial loss. By the time of the outbreak of the War for Independence, the next year, anathema to the pacifistic Quakers, he had rejected the faith altogether—culminating a trend that had been evolving because of his love of dancing and other social pleasures, as well as his Revolutionary activities.

As a member of the North Carolina assembly (1766–75), the committee of correspondence (1773), and the provincial assemblies (1774–75), Hewes helped the Whigs take down the royal government. Elected to the Continental Congress in 1774, he strongly backed nonimportation measures even though it meant personal financial setbacks. By the time the War for Independence broke out the following year, he had completely rejected the pacifistic beliefs of the Quakers—this change had been developing due to his passion for dancing and other social activities, as well as his involvement in Revolutionary efforts.

74

74

Joseph Hewes sponsored the American career of his friend John Paul Jones, who became the most famous naval officer of the Revolution.

Hewes was one of those who originally opposed separation from Great Britain. Thus it was a disagreeable task for him, in May 1776, to present the Halifax Resolves to the Continental Congress. Enacted the month before by the provincial assembly, they instructed the North Carolina Delegates to vote for independence should it be proposed. Hewes, who considered the resolves premature, ignored his State’s commitment and at first opposed Richard Henry Lee’s June 7 independence resolution. According to John Adams, however, at one point during debate a transformation came over Hewes. “He started suddenly upright,” reported Adams, “and lifting up both his hands to Heaven, as if he had been in a trance, cried out, ‘It is done! and I will abide by it.’”

Hewes was one of those who initially opposed breaking away from Great Britain. So, when he had to present the Halifax Resolves to the Continental Congress in May 1776, it was a tough role for him. These resolves, passed the month before by the provincial assembly, directed the North Carolina Delegates to vote for independence if it was proposed. Hewes, who thought the resolves were hasty, went against his State’s commitment and initially opposed Richard Henry Lee’s independence resolution on June 7. However, according to John Adams, a change overcame Hewes during the debate. “He suddenly stood up straight,” Adams reported, “and lifting both his hands to Heaven, as if he had been in a trance, shouted, ‘It is done! and I will abide by it.’”

One episode involving Hewes illustrates the recurring problem of sectional rivalries among the Delegates. As key members of the marine committee, Hewes and John Adams were instrumental in establishing the Continental Navy. When the time came to appoint the Nation’s first naval captains, the two men clashed. For one of the positions, Hewes nominated his friend John Paul Jones, an experienced seaman who had recently emigrated to Virginia from Scotland. Adams, maintaining that all the captaincies should be filled by New Englanders, stubbornly protested. New England had yielded to the South in the selection of a commander in chief of the75 Continental Army and Adams had fostered the selection of the able Virginian George Washington, so he was not now about to make a concession on the Navy. Hewes, sensing the futility of argument, reluctantly submitted. Jones, who was to become the most honored naval hero of the Revolution, received only a lieutenant’s commission.

One incident involving Hewes highlights the ongoing issue of regional rivalries among the Delegates. As key members of the marine committee, Hewes and John Adams played crucial roles in setting up the Continental Navy. When it came time to select the nation’s first naval captains, the two men had a conflict. For one of the positions, Hewes nominated his friend John Paul Jones, an experienced sailor who had recently moved to Virginia from Scotland. Adams argued that all captain positions should go to New Englanders and stubbornly opposed the nomination. New England had already given in to the South by accepting George Washington, an able Virginian, as commander in chief of the Continental Army, so Adams wasn’t about to make another concession for the Navy. Sensing that arguing was pointless, Hewes reluctantly backed down. Jones, who would become the most celebrated naval hero of the Revolution, ended up receiving only a lieutenant’s commission.

In 1777 Hewes lost his bid for reelection to Congress, one of the few failures in his life, and in 1778–79 he found solace in the State legislature. In the latter year, despite health problems, he accepted reelection to the Continental Congress. A few months after arriving back in Philadelphia and not long before his 50th birthday, overworked and fatigued, he died. His grave is in Christ Church Burial Ground there.

In 1777, Hewes lost his attempt to get reelected to Congress, which was one of the few setbacks in his life. In 1778–79, he found comfort in the State legislature. In 1779, despite health issues, he agreed to be reelected to the Continental Congress. A few months after returning to Philadelphia and not long before his 50th birthday, he died from exhaustion and fatigue. He is buried in Christ Church Burial Ground there.


Thomas Heyward, Jr.

SOUTH CAROLINA

S.C.

An aristocratic planter, lawyer, and jurist, Thomas Heyward, Jr., sat in the State legislature and the Continental Congress and commanded a militia battalion. He was one of three South Carolina signers captured and imprisoned by the British.

Thomas Heyward, Jr. was an aristocratic planter, lawyer, and judge who served in the state legislature and the Continental Congress, and also led a militia battalion. He was one of three South Carolina signers who were captured and imprisoned by the British.

The eldest son of one of the wealthiest planters in South Carolina, Heyward was born in 1746 at Old House Plantation, in St. Helena’s Parish (later St. Luke’s Parish and present Jasper County) near the76 Georgia border about 25 miles northeast of Savannah. In 1771, following 5 years of study in London, he began practicing law. The next year, his parish sent him to the colonial legislature (1772–75), which was feuding with the Royal Governor over parliamentary taxation. During that period, in 1773, he married and settled down at White Hall Plantation, only a couple of miles from the residence of his father.

The eldest son of one of the wealthiest planters in South Carolina, Heyward was born in 1746 at Old House Plantation in St. Helena’s Parish (later St. Luke’s Parish and now Jasper County) near the76 Georgia border, about 25 miles northeast of Savannah. In 1771, after studying in London for 5 years, he started practicing law. The following year, his parish elected him to the colonial legislature (1772–75), which was in conflict with the Royal Governor over taxes imposed by Parliament. During that time, in 1773, he got married and settled at White Hall Plantation, just a couple of miles from his father's home.

While a legislator, Heyward apparently joined the Revolutionaries, for in the summer of 1774 he attended a provincial convention that chose Delegates to the Continental Congress. During 1775–76 he was active in the first and second provincial congresses and on the council of safety and the committee that drafted a State constitution. In the Continental Congress (1776–78), he signed the Articles of Confederation as well as the Declaration. At the end of his tour, he journeyed to Charleston and took up residence in the townhouse he had inherited from his father the year before. He became a circuit court judge; represented Charleston in the State legislature, which convened in the city; and held a militia captaincy.

While serving as a legislator, Heyward seemingly joined the Revolutionaries, as he attended a provincial convention in the summer of 1774 that selected Delegates for the Continental Congress. Throughout 1775–76, he was active in the first and second provincial congresses, along with the council of safety and the committee that wrote a State constitution. During his time in the Continental Congress (1776–78), he signed both the Articles of Confederation and the Declaration. After his term, he traveled to Charleston and moved into the townhouse he had inherited from his father the previous year. He became a circuit court judge, represented Charleston in the State legislature that met in the city, and held the title of militia captain.

In 1779 Heyward was wounded during Brig. Gen. William Moultrie’s repulse of a British attack on Port Royal Island, along the South Carolina coast near Heyward’s home. The following year, the British plundered White Hall and carried off all the slaves. When they took Charleston, they captured Heyward, who was helping defend the city. He was imprisoned at St. Augustine, Fla., until July 1781. Shortly before his release, he celebrated Independence Day by setting patriotic verses to the British national anthem. “God save the King” became “God save the thirteen States,” a rendition that soon echoed from New Hampshire to Georgia.

In 1779, Heyward was injured during Brig. Gen. William Moultrie’s successful defense against a British attack on Port Royal Island, located along the South Carolina coast near where Heyward lived. The next year, the British raided White Hall and took all the slaves. When they captured Charleston, they also took Heyward, who was helping to defend the city. He was held in prison in St. Augustine, Florida, until July 1781. Just before he was released, he celebrated Independence Day by rewriting patriotic verses to the British national anthem. “God save the King” became “God save the thirteen States,” a version that quickly spread from New Hampshire to Georgia.

From 1782 until 1789 Heyward resumed his position of circuit court judge, concurrently serving two terms in the State legislature (1782–84). In 1785 he helped found and became the first president of the Agricultural Society of South Carolina. The following year, his wife passed away and he remarried; apparently only one child from his two marriages reached maturity. He devoted most of his remaining days, except for attendance in 1790 at the State constitutional convention, to managing his plantation; he sold his Charleston townhouse in 1794. The last to survive among the South Carolina signers, he died in 1809 at the age of 62 and was interred in the family cemetery at Old House Plantation.

From 1782 to 1789, Heyward returned to his role as a circuit court judge while also serving two terms in the State legislature (1782–84). In 1785, he helped establish and became the first president of the Agricultural Society of South Carolina. The next year, his wife died, and he remarried; it seems only one child from his two marriages reached adulthood. He spent most of the rest of his life—except for attending the State constitutional convention in 1790—managing his plantation; he sold his townhouse in Charleston in 1794. The last surviving signer from South Carolina, he died in 1809 at the age of 62 and was buried in the family cemetery at Old House Plantation.


77

77

William Hooper

NORTH CAROLINA

N.C.

The ambivalence of William Hooper’s convictions prevented him from ever carving a solid niche in the field of politics. His youthful choice of occupation and political affiliation brought estrangement from his family and emigration from Massachusetts to far-off North Carolina. Motivated sometimes by self-interest and sometimes by intense patriotism, he flourished in law and politics. He originally supported the royal government, but became a Whig leader during the Revolution. After the war, his aristocratic leanings caused him to lose favor among the electorate.

William Hooper's conflicting beliefs prevented him from establishing a stable position in politics. His early career decisions and political connections caused a rift with his family and prompted him to move from Massachusetts to far-off North Carolina. At times motivated by personal gain and at other times by a deep sense of patriotism, he excelled in law and politics. He initially supported the royal government but later emerged as a Whig leader during the Revolution. After the war, his upper-class inclinations led to a loss of support among voters.

Hooper was born in Boston, Mass., in 1742, the first child of William Hooper, a Scotch immigrant and Congregationalist clergyman who 5 years later was to transfer to the Anglican Church. Groomed for the ministry in his youth, Hooper undertook 7 years of preparatory education at Boston Latin School. This qualified him in 1757 to enter Harvard College in the sophomore class. He graduated 3 years later, but much to the chagrin of his father rejected the ministry as a profession. The next year, he further alienated his Loyalist father and isolated himself from his family by taking up the study of law under James Otis, a brilliant but radical lawyer.

Hooper was born in Boston, MA, in 1742, the first child of William Hooper, a Scottish immigrant and Congregationalist minister who five years later would switch to the Anglican Church. Prepared for the ministry in his youth, Hooper spent seven years in pre-college education at Boston Latin School. This allowed him to enter Harvard College as a sophomore in 1757. He graduated three years later, but much to his father's disappointment, he rejected a career in ministry. The following year, he further distanced himself from his Loyalist father and isolated himself from his family by studying law under James Otis, a brilliant but radical lawyer.

Partly to ameliorate family strife and partly to better his legal opportunities, about 1764 Hooper sought his fortune at Wilmington, N.C. Three years later, he married the daughter of an early settler, by whom he was to have two sons and a daughter. He resided either in Wilmington or at his nearby estate, Finian, about 8 miles away on Masonboro Sound, rode the circuit from court to court, and built up a clientele among the wealthy planters of the lower Cape Fear region. Ambitious, he harbored political aspirations and by 1770–71 had obtained the position of deputy attorney general of North Carolina.

Partly to ease family conflict and partly to improve his legal prospects, around 1764, Hooper went to Wilmington, N.C. Three years later, he married the daughter of an early settler, and they had two sons and a daughter. He lived either in Wilmington or at his nearby estate, Finian, about 8 miles away on Masonboro Sound, traveled from court to court, and built a clientele among the wealthy planters of the lower Cape Fear region. Ambitious, he had political ambitions and by 1770–71 had secured the role of deputy attorney general of North Carolina.

In this capacity, protecting his own economic interests and political goals, Hooper sided with Royal Governor William Tryon in a conflict between the government and a group of North Carolina78 frontiersmen known as the Regulators. They were rebelling against governmental corruption and oppression and high legal and other fees. Hooper urged the use of force to quell the rebellion, and in 1771 accompanied the government forces that defeated the rebels in the Battle of Alamance.

In this role, looking out for his own financial interests and political objectives, Hooper supported Royal Governor William Tryon during a clash between the government and a group of North Carolina78 frontiersmen known as the Regulators. They were rising up against government corruption and oppression, as well as excessive legal and other fees. Hooper advocated for using force to suppress the rebellion, and in 1771, he joined the government forces that defeated the rebels at the Battle of Alamance.

Within a few years, Hooper’s allegiance to the royal government waned. At the time of his election to the colonial assembly (1773–75), the act providing for the colony’s court system was about to expire. The assembly attempted to attach to the new court act a clause by which the colony could confiscate American property owned by foreign debtors, including inhabitants of Great Britain. When the Royal Governor blocked the bill, a 4-year struggle for control of the colony ensued. Hooper, though deprived of a source of income as a lawyer and dependent upon his wife’s small fortune for subsistence, championed the cause of the assembly.

Within a few years, Hooper’s loyalty to the royal government faded. At the time of his election to the colonial assembly (1773–75), the law establishing the colony’s court system was about to expire. The assembly tried to attach a provision to the new court law that would allow the colony to seize American property owned by foreign debtors, including residents of Great Britain. When the Royal Governor blocked the bill, a 4-year struggle for control of the colony began. Hooper, despite losing his income as a lawyer and relying on his wife’s small fortune for support, advocated for the assembly’s cause.

Hooper rose to a position of leadership among the Whigs, though he disapproved of extremism. In a letter dated April 1774 to his friend James Iredell, he prophesized the Colonies’ break with Great Britain—the earliest known prediction of independence, which won for Hooper the epithet “Prophet of Independence.” In the summer, after the Royal Governor had dissolved the colonial assembly, he helped organize and presided over an extralegal conference at Wilmington. It voted to convene a provincial assembly, which met in August at New Bern and elected Delegates, one of whom was Hooper, to the Continental Congress. Later that same year, he became a member of the committee of correspondence.

Hooper rose to a leadership role among the Whigs, although he wasn’t a fan of extreme actions. In a letter from April 1774 to his friend James Iredell, he predicted the Colonies’ separation from Great Britain—the earliest known forecast of independence, which earned him the nickname “Prophet of Independence.” That summer, after the Royal Governor dissolved the colonial assembly, he helped organize and led an unofficial conference in Wilmington. It decided to hold a provincial assembly, which gathered in August at New Bern and elected Delegates, one of whom was Hooper, to the Continental Congress. Later that same year, he became a member of the committee of correspondence.

During the period 1774–77, Hooper divided his time between Congress, where he gained a reputation as an orator, and the North Carolina provincial assembly, in which he labored to set up a State government. In 1777, however, the financial difficulties with his law practice and a desire to be near his family prompted him to resign from Congress and return to Wilmington. He was immediately elected to the State legislature and served there almost continuously until 1786.

During the years 1774–77, Hooper split his time between Congress, where he became known as a great speaker, and the North Carolina provincial assembly, where he worked to establish a state government. In 1777, though, financial issues with his law practice and a wish to be closer to his family led him to resign from Congress and head back to Wilmington. He was quickly elected to the state legislature and served there almost continuously until 1786.

In 1780 the British invaded North Carolina. Hooper moved his family from Finian into Wilmington for safety, but in January 1781, while he was away on business, the city fell to the enemy. Separated from his loved ones for more than 10 months and often destitute, he depended upon friends in Edenton and vicinity for shelter and food.79 On one occasion, taken violently ill with malaria, he was nursed back to health by Iredell’s wife. Upon the British evacuation of the Wilmington area, in November, Hooper returned to find most of his property, including Finian, in ruins. Shortly thereafter he rejoined his wife and children, who had fled to Hillsborough, which he made his home for the rest of his life.

In 1780, the British invaded North Carolina. Hooper moved his family from Finian to Wilmington for safety, but in January 1781, while he was away on business, the city fell to the enemy. Separated from his loved ones for over 10 months and often in dire straits, he relied on friends in Edenton and nearby areas for shelter and food.79 One time, after contracting malaria, he was nursed back to health by Iredell’s wife. When the British evacuated the Wilmington area in November, Hooper returned to find most of his property, including Finian, in ruins. Shortly after, he rejoined his wife and children, who had fled to Hillsborough, which he made his home for the rest of his life.

During the aftermath of the Revolution, Hooper, despite continuing political aspirations, lost favor with the public. Unable to adjust to the rise of republicanism in the State, he adopted a conservative stance. His aristocratic pretensions, forgiving attitude toward Loyalists, and lack of faith in the common people undermined his popularity. In 1788 he strenuously campaigned for State ratification of the Federal Constitution, which occurred early the next year. By this time, he was in ill health and despondent, but lingered on for nearly 2 years. He died in 1790 in his late forties. His remains, moved from the Hillsborough town cemetery in 1894, rest today at Guilford Courthouse National Military Park near Greensboro.

During the aftermath of the Revolution, Hooper, despite his ongoing political ambitions, lost the public's support. Unable to adapt to the rise of republicanism in the State, he took a conservative approach. His aristocratic outlook, lenient attitude towards Loyalists, and skepticism of the common people hurt his popularity. In 1788, he vigorously campaigned for the State to ratify the Federal Constitution, which was accomplished early the following year. By then, he was in poor health and feeling down, but he managed to hang on for almost 2 more years. He died in 1790 in his late forties. His remains, relocated from the Hillsborough town cemetery in 1894, now rest at Guilford Courthouse National Military Park near Greensboro.

80

80


Stephen Hopkins

RHODE ISLAND

Rhode Island

This signer, the second oldest next to Benjamin Franklin, is noted for his tremulous signature. Aged 69 and afflicted with palsy, according to tradition he declared, “My hand trembles, but my heart does not!” Before, during, and after a comparatively brief stretch of congressional service, he occupied Rhode Island’s highest offices and fostered the cultural and economic growth of Providence.

This signer, the second oldest after Benjamin Franklin, is known for his shaky signature. At 69 years old and struggling with palsy, he reportedly said, “My hand trembles, but my heart does not!” During his relatively brief time in Congress, he held the highest positions in Rhode Island and supported the cultural and economic growth of Providence.

Hopkins attained success purely by his own efforts. Born in 1707 at Providence and equipped with but a modicum of basic education, he grew up in the adjacent agricultural community of Scituate, earned his living as a farmer and surveyor, and married at the age of 19. Five years later, in 1731, when Scituate Township separated from Providence, he plunged into politics. During the next decade, he held the following elective or appointive offices: moderator of the first town meeting, town clerk, president of the town council, justice of the peace, justice and clerk of the Providence County court of common pleas, legislator, and speaker of the house.

Hopkins achieved success entirely through his own efforts. Born in 1707 in Providence and with just a basic education, he grew up in the nearby farming community of Scituate, made a living as a farmer and surveyor, and got married at 19. Five years later, in 1731, when Scituate Township split from Providence, he got involved in politics. Over the next ten years, he held various elected and appointed positions: moderator of the first town meeting, town clerk, president of the town council, justice of the peace, justice and clerk of the Providence County court of common pleas, legislator, and speaker of the house.

In 1742, about 2 years after he and his brother Esek founded a mercantile-shipping firm, Stephen moved back to Providence. For the next three decades, he built up his business and would probably have acquired a fortune had he not at the same time supported a variety of civic enterprises and broadened his political activities. He continued in the legislature, served as assistant and chief justice of the Superior Court and ten-time Governor, and represented Rhode Island at various intercolonial meetings. At the Albany Congress (1754), he cultivated a friendship with Franklin and assisted him in framing a plan of colonial union that the congress passed but the Colonies rejected. The next year, 2 years after the demise of his first wife, who had given birth to five sons and two daughters, he remarried.

In 1742, about two years after he and his brother Esek started a shipping and trading business, Stephen moved back to Providence. Over the next thirty years, he grew his business and likely would have amassed a fortune if he hadn't also supported various community projects and expanded his political involvement. He remained active in the legislature, served as assistant and chief justice of the Superior Court, was elected governor ten times, and represented Rhode Island at several intercolonial meetings. At the Albany Congress (1754), he developed a friendship with Franklin and helped draft a plan for colonial unity that the congress approved, but the Colonies ultimately rejected. The following year, two years after the death of his first wife, who had given birth to five sons and two daughters, he remarried.

About this time, Hopkins took over leadership of the colony’s radical faction, supported by Providence merchants. For more than a decade, it bitterly fought for political supremacy in Rhode Island with a conservative group in Newport, led by Samuel Ward, a political enemy of Hopkins.

About this time, Hopkins took charge of the colony’s radical faction, backed by merchants from Providence. For over a decade, it fiercely battled for political dominance in Rhode Island against a conservative group in Newport, led by Samuel Ward, who was a political rival of Hopkins.

Hopkins was a man of broad interests, including humanitarianism, education, and science, and exerted his talents in many fields. About 1754 he helped set up a public subscription library in Providence. He acted as first chancellor of Rhode Island College (later Brown University), founded in 1764 at Warren, and 6 years later was instrumental in relocating it to Providence. He also held membership in the Philosophical Society of Newport. Strongly opposing slavery, in 1774 he authored a bill enacted by the Rhode Island legislature that prohibited the importation of slaves into the colony—one of the earliest antislavery laws in the United States.

Hopkins was a man with a wide range of interests, including humanitarianism, education, and science, and he applied his skills in many areas. Around 1754, he helped establish a public subscription library in Providence. He served as the first chancellor of Rhode Island College (later Brown University), which was founded in 1764 in Warren, and six years later, he played a key role in moving it to Providence. He was also a member of the Philosophical Society of Newport. Firmly against slavery, in 1774 he wrote a bill that was passed by the Rhode Island legislature, prohibiting the importation of slaves into the colony—one of the earliest antislavery laws in the United States.

Long before, Hopkins had sided with the Revolutionaries. In 176281 he helped found the influential Providence Gazette and Country Journal. Two years later, he contributed to it an article entitled “The Rights of the Colonies Examined,” which criticized parliamentary taxation and recommended colonial home rule. Issued as a pamphlet the next year, it circulated widely throughout the Colonies and Great Britain and established Hopkins as one of the earliest of the patriot leaders. He also sat on the Rhode Island committee of correspondence and carried on with his duties in the legislature and Superior Court while a Member of the Continental Congress (1774–76). He served on the committees that prepared the Articles of Confederation and that created the Continental Navy and appointed Esek Hopkins as its commander in chief. Ill health compelled Stephen to retire in September 1776, a month after he signed the Declaration.

Long ago, Hopkins had aligned himself with the Revolutionaries. In 176281, he helped establish the influential Providence Gazette and Country Journal. Two years later, he contributed an article titled “The Rights of the Colonies Examined,” which criticized parliamentary taxation and advocated for colonial self-governance. Released as a pamphlet the following year, it spread widely across the Colonies and Great Britain, positioning Hopkins as one of the earliest patriot leaders. He also served on the Rhode Island committee of correspondence while managing his responsibilities in the legislature and Superior Court, all while being a Member of the Continental Congress (1774–76). He participated in the committees that drafted the Articles of Confederation and established the Continental Navy, appointing Esek Hopkins as its commander in chief. Due to poor health, Stephen had to step back in September 1776, a month after he signed the Declaration.

Hopkins declined subsequent reelections to Congress, but sat in the State legislature for a time and took part in several New England political conventions. He withdrew from public service about 1780 and died 5 years later in Providence at the age of 78. He was interred in the North Burial Ground.

Hopkins chose not to run for Congress again after his initial terms, but he was active in the State legislature for a while and participated in several political conventions in New England. He stepped away from public service around 1780 and passed away five years later in Providence at the age of 78. He was buried in the North Burial Ground.

82

82


Francis Hopkinson

NEW JERSEY

NEW JERSEY

The literary and artistic talents of this versatile signer brought him more acclaim than his political and legal activities. Although a lawyer and judge by profession, he achieved more eminence as an essayist, poet, artist, and musician. His verse and satirical essays rank among the better literary efforts of the Revolutionary and early Federal periods, and he was one of America’s first native composers. His eldest son, Joseph (1770–1842), wrote “Hail Columbia” and won distinction as a lawyer, jurist, U.S. Congressman, and patron of the arts.

The diverse talents of this multi-talented signer earned him more fame than his work in politics and law. While he was a lawyer and judge by trade, he became better known as an essayist, poet, artist, and musician. His poetry and satirical essays are considered some of the finest literary works from the Revolutionary and early Federal periods, and he was one of America’s first native composers. His oldest son, Joseph (1770–1842), wrote “Hail Columbia” and achieved recognition as a lawyer, judge, U.S. Congressman, and advocate for the arts.

Hopkinson was born at Philadelphia in 1737, the eldest of eight children. His father, who died when he was 14, was a prominent lawyer-jurist, politician, and civic leader. Upon graduation from the College of Philadelphia (later part of the University of Pennsylvania) in 1757, young Hopkinson studied law under Benjamin Chew, attorney general of the province, and 4 years later joined the bar. In 1763 he obtained the position of customs collector at Salem, N.J. Three years hence, after failing in business, he sailed to England to seek an appointment as colonial customs collector through the influence of friends and relatives. During his yearlong stay, though unsuccessful in his vocational quest, he visited Benjamin Franklin, Lord North, and other prominent people, and may have studied under artist Benjamin West.

Hopkinson was born in Philadelphia in 1737, the oldest of eight kids. His father, who passed away when he was 14, was a well-known lawyer, politician, and community leader. After graduating from the College of Philadelphia (which later became part of the University of Pennsylvania) in 1757, young Hopkinson studied law under Benjamin Chew, the attorney general of the province, and four years later he was admitted to the bar. In 1763, he took the job of customs collector in Salem, N.J. Three years later, after struggling in business, he went to England to try to get a position as a colonial customs collector with the help of friends and family. During his year there, although he didn't find the job he was looking for, he met with Benjamin Franklin, Lord North, and other notable figures, and he may have studied under the artist Benjamin West.

Back in Philadelphia, Hopkinson operated a store and married in 1768. Four years later he became the customs collector at New Castle, Del. About 1774 he took up residence at the home of his father-in-law in Bordentown, N.J., practiced law, and began a 2-year tour in the legislature. As a Member of the Continental Congress for only a few months in 1776, he relieved his ennui by drawing caricatures of his colleagues. His later offices included: chairman (1777–78) of Philadelphia’s Continental Navy Board, treasurer of loans (1778–81), judge of the admiralty court of Pennsylvania (1779), and Federal circuit judge for the eastern district of the State (1789–91).

Back in Philadelphia, Hopkinson ran a store and got married in 1768. Four years later, he became the customs collector in New Castle, Delaware. Around 1774, he moved in with his father-in-law in Bordentown, New Jersey, started practicing law, and began a two-year term in the legislature. As a Member of the Continental Congress for just a few months in 1776, he kept himself entertained by drawing caricatures of his fellow members. His later positions included: chairman (1777–78) of Philadelphia’s Continental Navy Board, treasurer of loans (1778–81), judge of the admiralty court of Pennsylvania (1779), and Federal circuit judge for the eastern district of the state (1789–91).

During his busy public career, the ambitious Hopkinson managed to leave his stamp on the fields of music, art, and literature. His “My Days Have Been So Wondrous Free” (1759) probably represents the first American composition of secular music; his “Temple of Minerva” (1781), the first American attempt at opera. In art, he was noted particularly for his crayon portraits and his work on heraldic emblems. But his literary attainments surpassed all his others.

During his busy public career, the ambitious Hopkinson left his mark on music, art, and literature. His “My Days Have Been So Wondrous Free” (1759) is likely the first American piece of secular music, while his “Temple of Minerva” (1781) was the first American attempt at an opera. In the art world, he was especially recognized for his crayon portraits and his work on heraldic symbols. However, his literary achievements were more impressive than all his other contributions.

Between 1757 and 1773, Hopkinson contributed numerous poems and essays, many of them in a humorous and satirical vein, to various periodicals. The following year, he began advancing the patriot cause. A profusion of widely read and influential pamphlets, essays, and letters, often presented in an allegorical style, derided and ridiculed the British and the Loyalists, outlined colonial grievances, and encouraged the colonists. The Prophecy, written in 1776 before the adoption of the Declaration of Independence, predicted that event.83 After the war, Hopkinson continued to treat political and social themes, and became one of the best known writers in the United States.

Between 1757 and 1773, Hopkinson wrote a lot of poems and essays, many of which were humorous and satirical, for various periodicals. The following year, he started promoting the patriot cause. He published a number of widely read and influential pamphlets, essays, and letters, often in an allegorical style, that mocked the British and Loyalists, highlighted colonial grievances, and motivated the colonists. The Prophecy, written in 1776 before the Declaration of Independence was adopted, predicted that event.83 After the war, Hopkinson continued to address political and social issues and became one of the best-known writers in the United States.

While a Federal circuit judge, Hopkinson died in Philadelphia at the age of 53. He was laid to rest in Christ Church Burial Ground. Surviving him were his widow and five children.

While serving as a Federal circuit judge, Hopkinson passed away in Philadelphia at the age of 53. He was buried in Christ Church Burial Ground. He is survived by his wife and five children.


Samuel Huntington

CONNECTICUT

CONNECTICUT

Several of the signers were self-made men. One of the most successful of them was Samuel Huntington. Reared amid humble surroundings, he educated himself in the law and, despite recurring health problems, climbed to the pinnacles of the State and National Governments.

Many of the signers were self-made individuals. One of the most successful was Samuel Huntington. Growing up in a humble background, he taught himself the law and, despite dealing with ongoing health problems, made it to the top ranks of both State and National Governments.

Born into a large family in 1731 at Windham (present Scotland), Conn., Huntington grew up on a farm, received a limited education, and at the age of 16 began work as a cooper. But his ambition soon pushed him onward. He independently studied borrowed legal tomes, won admittance to the bar about 1758, and set up practice. Two years later, he moved to nearby Norwich. The next year, he married; he and his wife, who were to be childless, later adopted three children. As time went on, he prospered in the law and became a community leader.

Born into a large family in 1731 in Windham (present-day Scotland), Conn., Huntington grew up on a farm, received a limited education, and at 16 began working as a cooper. However, his ambition soon drove him to pursue more. He self-studied borrowed legal books, gained admission to the bar around 1758, and started his practice. Two years later, he moved to nearby Norwich. The following year, he got married; he and his wife, who remained childless, later adopted three children. As time went on, he thrived in law and became a community leader.

In 1764 Huntington began his public career, in the Connecticut legislature. The next year, he was appointed as King’s Attorney of84 the colony and won election as justice of the peace for New London County. He occupied these positions for practically the entire decade or so prior to the outbreak of the War for Independence, in 1775. Meantime, 2 years earlier, the colonial legislature had named him as a judge of the Connecticut Superior Court, an appointment renewed annually for a decade.

In 1764, Huntington started his public career in the Connecticut legislature. The following year, he was appointed as the King’s Attorney for the colony and was elected as a justice of the peace for New London County. He held these positions for almost the entire decade leading up to the start of the War for Independence in 1775. In the meantime, two years earlier, the colonial legislature had appointed him as a judge of the Connecticut Superior Court, a position he was reappointed to every year for a decade.

In 1774 Huntington, registering his growing sympathy for the Colonies in their struggle against the Crown, resigned as King’s Attorney and joined the front ranks of the Revolutionaries. The next year, he became a member of the upper house of the legislature (1775–84), and entered national politics when he became a Delegate to the Continental Congress. His committee assignments included those dealing with Indian affairs, ordnance supply, and marine matters. In the fall of 1776, fatigue and health worries caused him to return to Connecticut. Between then and 1783, plagued with spells of illness, he attended congressional sessions intermittently (1778, 1779–81, 1783), often returning home to recuperate. Despite this burden, he assumed the heavy responsibilities of President of Congress (1779–81), presiding on March 1, 1781, when the Articles of Confederation were adopted.

In 1774, Huntington, showing his increasing support for the Colonies in their fight against the Crown, stepped down as King’s Attorney and joined the Revolutionaries. The following year, he became a member of the upper house of the legislature (1775–84) and got involved in national politics as a Delegate to the Continental Congress. His committee work included areas like Indian affairs, ordnance supply, and maritime issues. In the fall of 1776, health concerns and exhaustion led him to return to Connecticut. From then until 1783, he struggled with illness, attending congressional sessions sporadically (1778, 1779–81, 1783), often going home to recover. Despite these challenges, he took on the significant role of President of Congress (1779–81), presiding on March 1, 1781, when the Articles of Confederation were adopted.

Huntington’s well-earned “retirement” when he returned to Connecticut in 1783, after 8 years of service to the Nation, turned out to involve 12 years of vigorous activity—despite his waning health. Even while he had been in Congress, he had served his State in various other ways, and all his legislative and other positions had been held open for him. A succession of appointive and elective offices followed: chief justice of the Superior Court (1784), Lieutenant Governor (1785), and Governor (1786–96). In the latter capacity, he led the battle for Connecticut’s ratification of the Federal Constitution and improved the educational system. As one of Connecticut’s seven first presidential electors, in 1789 he won two “favorite son” votes for the Presidency.

Huntington's well-deserved "retirement" when he returned to Connecticut in 1783, after eight years of service to the nation, ended up being 12 years of active engagement—despite his declining health. Even while he was in Congress, he continued to serve his state in various other ways, and all his legislative and other positions were kept open for him. He held a series of appointed and elected offices: chief justice of the Superior Court (1784), Lieutenant Governor (1785), and Governor (1786–96). As Governor, he championed Connecticut's ratification of the Federal Constitution and worked to enhance the educational system. As one of Connecticut's seven first presidential electors in 1789, he received two "favorite son" votes for the presidency.

Ever interested in education, despite his own lack of a college degree, in the 1780’s Huntington received honorary degrees from Princeton, Yale, and Dartmouth; and was appointed one of the original trustees of Plainfield (Conn.) Academy. Before that time, he had acted as adviser to the president of Yale.

Ever interested in education, despite not having a college degree himself, in the 1780s Huntington received honorary degrees from Princeton, Yale, and Dartmouth, and was appointed as one of the original trustees of Plainfield (Conn.) Academy. Before that, he served as an adviser to the president of Yale.

In 1796 at the age of 65, still Governor, he died at his home in Norwich and was interred in the Old Burial Ground.

In 1796, at the age of 65, he was still Governor when he passed away at his home in Norwich and was buried in the Old Burial Ground.


85

85

Thomas Jefferson

VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA

An intellectual and political titan who ranked among the most brilliant men of his time, Thomas Jefferson richly contributed to his State and Nation—as statesman, diplomat, scientist, architect, author, and educator. Graced with a wide-ranging and probing mind, he also delved into linguistics, law, art, geography, ethnology, music, agriculture, paleontology, botany, meteorology, geology, parliamentary practice, and invention.

An intellectual and political powerhouse who was one of the most brilliant minds of his time, Thomas Jefferson made major contributions to his state and nation—as a statesman, diplomat, scientist, architect, writer, and teacher. With a varied and curious intellect, he also delved into linguistics, law, art, geography, ethnology, music, agriculture, paleontology, botany, meteorology, geology, parliamentary procedure, and invention.

As author of the Declaration of Independence, influential political theorist, cofounder of the Democratic-Republican Party, Virginia legislator and Governor, first U.S. Secretary of State, second Vice President, and third President, Jefferson has left an indelible impression on our political system and philosophy. Beyond that, he laid the basis for the westward expansion of the Nation; and two of his disciples, Madison and Monroe, followed him into the White House.

As the author of the Declaration of Independence, an influential political thinker, a cofounder of the Democratic-Republican Party, a Virginia legislator and Governor, the first U.S. Secretary of State, the second Vice President, and the third President, Jefferson has made a lasting impact on our political system and philosophy. Additionally, he set the groundwork for the westward expansion of the nation; and two of his followers, Madison and Monroe, succeeded him in the White House.

Like most successful politicians, however, Jefferson created his share of enemies and felt the sting of failure. Inability to reconcile his contradictory traits of idealism and pragmatism resulted in inconsistencies that rendered him vulnerable. He lacked the aggressiveness and charisma of many leaders. To compensate for his basic shyness and his deficiencies as a speaker, he mastered written expression and learned to exercise administrative power. His governorship ended ignominiously. And his vision of an agricultural America,86 peopled by well-educated and politically astute yeomen farmers was never to be realized. Yet none of these factors diminishes his stature or undermines his achievements.

Like most successful politicians, Jefferson made his fair share of enemies and experienced the pain of failure. His struggle to balance his contradictory traits of idealism and pragmatism led to inconsistencies that made him vulnerable. He didn't have the aggressiveness or charisma of many leaders. To make up for his natural shyness and shortcomings as a speaker, he excelled in written communication and learned to wield administrative power. His time as governor ended poorly. His vision of an agricultural America,86 filled with well-educated and politically savvy farmers, was never achieved. Yet none of these factors diminish his reputation or undermine his accomplishments.

The eldest of two sons in a family of ten, Jefferson was born in 1743 at Shadwell, a frontier plantation in Goochland (present Albemarle) County, Va. But 2 years later his father, Peter, a self-made surveyor-magistrate-planter who had married into the distinguished Randolphs, moved his family eastward to Tuckahoe Plantation, near Richmond. His reason for doing so was a promise he had made to his wife’s newly deceased first cousin, William Randolph, to act as guardian of his son, Thomas Mann Randolph. Young Jefferson passed most of his boyhood in the Randolph home, beginning his elementary education with private tutors. In 1752, when he was about 9 years old, the family returned to Shadwell. His father died 5 years later and bequeathed him almost 3,000 acres.

The oldest of two sons in a family of ten, Jefferson was born in 1743 at Shadwell, a frontier plantation in Goochland (now Albemarle) County, Virginia. However, two years later, his father, Peter, a self-made surveyor-magistrate-planter who had married into the prominent Randolph family, moved the family east to Tuckahoe Plantation, near Richmond. He did this to fulfill a promise he made to his wife's recently deceased cousin, William Randolph, to act as guardian for his son, Thomas Mann Randolph. Young Jefferson spent most of his childhood in the Randolph home, starting his elementary education with private tutors. In 1752, when he was about nine years old, the family returned to Shadwell. His father passed away five years later and left him almost 3,000 acres.

In 1760, at the age of 17, Jefferson matriculated at the College of William and Mary, in Williamsburg. An incidental benefit was the chance to observe the operation of practical politics in the colonial capital. Jefferson graduated in 1762, studied law locally under the noted teacher George Wythe, and in 1767 was admitted to the bar.

In 1760, at 17 years old, Jefferson started at the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg. An unexpected advantage was the opportunity to witness practical politics in the colonial capital. Jefferson graduated in 1762, studied law locally under the well-known teacher George Wythe, and was admitted to the bar in 1767.

At Shadwell, Jefferson assumed the civic responsibilities and prominence his father had enjoyed. In 1770, when fire consumed the structure, he moved to his nearby estate Monticello, where he had already begun building a home. In 1772 he married Martha Wayles Skelton, a widow. During their decade of life together, she was to bear six children, but only two daughters reached maturity.

At Shadwell, Jefferson took on the civic duties and status that his father had held. In 1770, when a fire destroyed the building, he moved to his nearby estate, Monticello, where he had already started constructing a home. In 1772, he married Martha Wayles Skelton, a widow. During their ten years together, she gave birth to six children, but only two daughters lived to adulthood.

Meanwhile, in 1769 at the age of 26, Jefferson had been elected to the House of Burgesses in Williamsburg. He was a member continuously until 1775, and alined himself with the anti-British group. Unlike his smooth-tongued confreres Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee, Jefferson concentrated his efforts in committee work rather than in debate. A literary stylist, he drafted many of the Revolutionary documents adopted by the House of Burgesses. His A Summary View of the Rights of British America (1774), one of the most influential essays of the era, disavowed parliamentary control of the Colonies and contended that they were tied to the King only by their own volition and recognition of mutual benefits.

Meanwhile, in 1769 at the age of 26, Jefferson was elected to the House of Burgesses in Williamsburg. He served continuously until 1775 and aligned himself with the anti-British group. Unlike his eloquent peers Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee, Jefferson focused his efforts on committee work instead of public debate. A skilled writer, he drafted many of the revolutionary documents adopted by the House of Burgesses. His A Summary View of the Rights of British America (1774), one of the most influential essays of the time, rejected parliamentary control of the Colonies and argued that their connection to the King was based solely on their own choice and recognition of mutual benefits.

87

87

First page of Thomas Jefferson’s pamphlet A Summary View (1774), one of the earliest and most influential Revolutionary tracts.

Jefferson utilized the same working methods in the Continental Congress (1775–76), where his decisiveness in committee contrasted88 markedly with his silence on the floor. His colleagues, however, rejected several of the documents he drafted his first year because of their extreme anti-British tone. But, by the time he returned the following May, after spending the winter in Virginia, the temper of Congress had changed drastically. The very next month, though only 33 years old, he was assigned to the five-man committee chosen to draft the Declaration of Independence, a task his colleagues assigned to him. In September, not long after Congress had adopted the draft with modifications and most of the Delegates signed it, Jefferson returned to Virginia—anxious to be nearer home and feeling he could make a deeper political mark there.

Jefferson used the same working methods in the Continental Congress (1775–76), where his decisiveness in committees stood in stark contrast to his silence on the floor. However, his colleagues rejected several of the documents he wrote in his first year due to their extreme anti-British tone. But by the time he returned the following May after spending the winter in Virginia, the mood in Congress had changed significantly. The very next month, at just 33 years old, he was appointed to the five-man committee tasked with drafting the Declaration of Independence, a responsibility his colleagues gave him. In September, shortly after Congress adopted the draft with changes and most Delegates signed it, Jefferson went back to Virginia—eager to be closer to home and feeling he could have a bigger political impact there.

A notable career in the House of Delegates (1776–79), the lower house of the legislature, followed. There Jefferson took over leadership of the “progressive” party from Patrick Henry, who relinquished it to become Governor. Highlights of this service included revision of the State laws (1776–79), in which Jefferson collaborated with George Wythe and Edmund Pendleton; and authorship of a bill for the establishment of religious freedom in Virginia, introduced in 1779 but not passed until 7 years later.

A notable career in the House of Delegates (1776–79), the lower house of the legislature, followed. There, Jefferson took over leadership of the "progressive" party from Patrick Henry, who stepped down to become Governor. Highlights of this service included revising the state laws (1776–79), in which Jefferson worked with George Wythe and Edmund Pendleton; and writing a bill for establishing religious freedom in Virginia, which was introduced in 1779 but not passed until seven years later.

Although hampered as Governor (1779–81) by wartime conditions and constitutional limitations, Jefferson proved to be a weak executive, even in emergencies hesitating to wield his authority. When the British invaded the State in the spring of 1781, the situation became chaotic. On June 3, while the legislature was meeting in Charlottesville because the redcoats held Richmond, Jefferson recommended the combining of civil and military agencies under Gen. Thomas Nelson, Jr., and virtually abdicated office. The next day, British raiders almost captured him and a group of legislators he was entertaining at Monticello. Although later formally vindicated for his abandonment of the governorship, the action fostered a conservative takeover of the government and his reputation remained clouded for some time.

Although limited as Governor (1779–81) by wartime conditions and constitutional restrictions, Jefferson turned out to be a weak leader, often hesitating to use his authority even in emergencies. When the British invaded the state in the spring of 1781, chaos ensued. On June 3, while the legislature was meeting in Charlottesville because the British controlled Richmond, Jefferson suggested merging civil and military agencies under Gen. Thomas Nelson, Jr., effectively stepping down from his position. The next day, British raiders nearly captured him and a group of lawmakers he was hosting at Monticello. Even though he was later formally cleared of blame for leaving the governorship, his actions led to a conservative takeover of the government, and his reputation remained tarnished for a while.

Jefferson stayed out of the limelight for 2 years, during which time his wife died. In 1783 he reentered Congress, which the next year sent him to Paris to aid Benjamin Franklin and John Adams in their attempts to negotiate commercial treaties with European nations. During his 5-year stay, Jefferson succeeded Franklin as Minister to France (1785–89), gained various commercial concessions from and strengthened relations with the French, visited89 England and Italy, absorbed European culture, and observed the beginnings of the French Revolution.

Jefferson stayed out of the spotlight for two years while his wife passed away. In 1783, he returned to Congress, which the following year sent him to Paris to help Benjamin Franklin and John Adams negotiate trade agreements with European countries. During his five years there, Jefferson took over from Franklin as Minister to France (1785–89), secured various trade concessions from the French, strengthened ties with them, visited England and Italy, experienced European culture, and witnessed the early stages of the French Revolution.

The University of Virginia in 1826, the year of the death of founder Jefferson.

In the years that followed, interspersed with pleasant interludes at Monticello, Jefferson filled the highest offices in the land: Secretary of State (1790–93), Vice President (1797–1801), and two-term President (1801–9). Ever averse to political strife, he occupied these positions as much out of a sense of civic and party duty as personal ambition. Aggravating normal burdens and pressures were his bitter feuds with Alexander Hamilton on most aspects of national policy, and the vindictiveness of Federalist attacks. Jefferson took considerable satisfaction, however, from his many accomplishments. Among these was the cofounding with James Madison of the Democratic-Republican Party, which in time drove the Federalists out of power.

In the years that followed, along with enjoyable breaks at Monticello, Jefferson held the highest offices in the country: Secretary of State (1790–93), Vice President (1797–1801), and two terms as President (1801–09). Always resistant to political conflict, he took on these roles as much out of civic and party responsibility as personal ambition. On top of the usual burdens and pressures were his intense disagreements with Alexander Hamilton on most national policy matters and the harsh attacks from Federalists. However, Jefferson found significant satisfaction in his many achievements. One of these was cofounding the Democratic-Republican Party with James Madison, which eventually pushed the Federalists out of power.

Physically and mentally exhausted, in 1809 Jefferson retired for the final time to Monticello. He retained his health and varied interests and corresponded with and entertained statesmen, politicians, scientists, explorers, scholars, and Indian chiefs. When the pace of life grew too hectic, he found haven at Poplar Forest, a retreat near Lynchburg he had designed and built in 1806–19. His pet project during most of his last decade was founding the University of Virginia (1819), in Charlottesville.

Physically and mentally worn out, in 1809 Jefferson retired for the last time to Monticello. He maintained his health and diverse interests, keeping in touch with and hosting statesmen, politicians, scientists, explorers, scholars, and Native American leaders. When life became too hectic, he found peace at Poplar Forest, a getaway near Lynchburg that he had designed and built between 1806 and 1819. His main focus during most of his final decade was establishing the University of Virginia (1819) in Charlottesville.

Painfully distressing to Jefferson, however, was the woeful state of his finances. His small salary in public office, the attendant neglect90 of his fortune and estate, general economic conditions, and debts he inherited from his wife had taken a heavy toll. He lived more frugally than was his custom in an attempt to stave off disaster and sold off as many of his lands and slaves as he could. But when a friend defaulted on a note for a large sum, Jefferson fell hopelessly into debt and was forced to sell his library to the Government. It became the nucleus of the Library of Congress.

Painfully distressing to Jefferson, however, was the miserable state of his finances. His small salary in public office, the resulting neglect of his fortune and estate, the general economic conditions, and debts he inherited from his wife had taken a heavy toll. He lived more frugally than usual in an attempt to avoid disaster and sold off as many of his lands and slaves as he could. But when a friend defaulted on a loan for a large amount, Jefferson fell hopelessly into debt and had to sell his library to the government. It became the foundation of the Library of Congress.

Jefferson died only a few hours before John Adams at the age of 83 on July 4, 1826, the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration of Independence. For his tombstone at Monticello, ignoring his many high offices and multitudes of other achievements, he chose three accomplishments that he wanted to be remembered for: authorship of the Declaration of Independence and the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom and the founding of the University of Virginia.

Jefferson died just a few hours before John Adams at the age of 83 on July 4, 1826, the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration of Independence. For his tombstone at Monticello, overlooking his many high offices and numerous other achievements, he chose three accomplishments he wanted to be remembered for: authoring the Declaration of Independence, the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, and founding the University of Virginia.

91

91


Francis Lightfoot Lee

VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA

No less a patriot than his dynamic elder brother Richard Henry and his gifted younger brothers Arthur and William, Francis Lightfoot Lee preferred the uneventful life of a country squire to the public spotlight and chose to follow rather than to lead. Despite his shyness and weakness as a speaker, he exercised extensive political influence, took an active part in the Revolution, and signed both the Declaration and the Articles of Confederation.

Just as patriotic as his charismatic older brother Richard Henry and his gifted younger brothers Arthur and William, Francis Lightfoot Lee chose a quieter life as a country gentleman instead of seeking fame. He preferred to support others rather than take charge. Despite being shy and struggling with public speaking, he held considerable political influence, was actively involved in the Revolution, and signed both the Declaration and the Articles of Confederation.

Lee, a member of one of the most famous families in Virginia and U.S. history and the sixth son and eighth child of planter Thomas Lee, was born in 1734 at the family estate, Stratford Hall, in Westmoreland County, Va. He was educated by a private tutor and never attended college. In 1750, upon the death of his father, he inherited Coton, an estate in Fairfax County. Seven years later, newly created Loudoun County absorbed Coton. At that time, the colonial legislature nominated him as Loudoun lieutenant. The next year, he moved to Coton and became trustee of the newly incorporated village of Leesburg, named after him or his brother Philip Ludwell, both local landowners. For the next decade, Francis Lightfoot represented the county in the House of Burgesses.

Lee, a member of one of the most famous families in Virginia and U.S. history and the sixth son and eighth child of plantation owner Thomas Lee, was born in 1734 at the family estate, Stratford Hall, in Westmoreland County, Virginia. He was educated by a private tutor and never attended college. In 1750, after his father passed away, he inherited Coton, an estate in Fairfax County. Seven years later, when Loudoun County was created, it took over Coton. At that time, the colonial legislature appointed him as Loudoun's lieutenant. The following year, he moved to Coton and became a trustee of the newly incorporated village of Leesburg, named after him or his brother Philip Ludwell, both local landowners. For the next ten years, Francis Lightfoot represented the county in the House of Burgesses.

In 1769 Lee married socialite Rebecca Tayloe of Richmond County. The newlyweds resided at Mount Airy estate with Rebecca’s parents for a few months until Menokin, a new home that Colonel Tayloe was building nearby for them, was completed. From then until 1774, Lee sat again with the burgesses.

In 1769, Lee married socialite Rebecca Tayloe from Richmond County. The newlyweds lived at the Mount Airy estate with Rebecca’s parents for a few months until Menokin, a new home that Colonel Tayloe was building nearby for them, was finished. From then until 1774, Lee served again with the burgesses.

Lee had joined the Revolutionary movement at an early date. From the time of the Stamp Act (1765) until the outbreak of war a decade later, he participated in most of the Virginia protests and assemblies. He rarely debated on the floor in Congress (1775–79), but often opposed the position of his brother Richard Henry, and served on the military and marine committees as well as that charged with drafting the Articles of Confederation.

Lee joined the Revolutionary movement early on. From the time of the Stamp Act (1765) until the war broke out a decade later, he took part in most of the protests and assemblies in Virginia. He didn’t often speak in Congress (1775–79), but frequently disagreed with his brother Richard Henry and was on the military and marine committees, as well as the one responsible for drafting the Articles of Confederation.

In 1779, weary of office and longing for the peace and quiet of Menokin, Lee left Congress. Except for a few years in the State legislature, he abandoned public service altogether and lived quietly. In 1797, only a few months after the death of his childless wife, at the age of 62 he succumbed. Burial took place in the Tayloe family graveyard at Mount Airy.

In 1779, tired of his duties and craving the peace and quiet of Menokin, Lee left Congress. Aside from a few years in the State legislature, he completely stepped away from public service and lived a quiet life. In 1797, just a few months after his wife passed away without any children, he died at the age of 62. He was buried in the Tayloe family graveyard at Mount Airy.


92

92

Richard Henry Lee

VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA

Richard Henry Lee, brilliant orator and fiery Revolutionary leader, introduced the independence resolution in the Continental Congress, served for awhile as its President, and later became a U.S. Senator. Fearing undue centralization of power, he fought against the Constitution and led the campaign that brought inclusion of the Bill of Rights. Throughout his life, he strenuously opposed the institution of slavery. He and Francis Lightfoot Lee were the only brothers among the signers.

Richard Henry Lee, a skilled speaker and dedicated Revolutionary leader, introduced the independence resolution in the Continental Congress, served as its President for a period, and later became a U.S. Senator. Concerned about excessive central authority, he opposed the Constitution and advocated for the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. Throughout his life, he was a strong opponent of slavery. He and his brother Francis Lightfoot Lee were the only siblings among the signers.

Fifth son and seventh of 11 children, Lee was born in 1732 along the Potomac shore at Stratford Hall. His initial tutorial education was supplemented by extensive study at Wakefield Academy, in Yorkshire, England, and a tour of northern Europe. He sailed home about 1751 at the age of 19, the year after his father’s death, and resided with his eldest brother Philip Ludwell at Stratford Hall. In 1757 Richard Henry married. About this time, he began building and soon occupied Chantilly, about 3 miles to the east on land leased from his brother. In 1768 Richard Henry’s wife died, leaving four children; the next year, he remarried, a union that yielded five more offspring.

Fifth son and seventh of 11 children, Lee was born in 1732 along the Potomac River at Stratford Hall. His early education was enhanced by extensive study at Wakefield Academy in Yorkshire, England, and a tour of northern Europe. He returned home around 1751 at the age of 19, the year after his father's death, and lived with his oldest brother, Philip Ludwell, at Stratford Hall. In 1757, Richard Henry got married. Around this time, he started building and soon moved into Chantilly, about 3 miles to the east on land leased from his brother. In 1768, Richard Henry’s wife passed away, leaving him with four children; the following year, he remarried, which resulted in five more kids.

Lee meantime, following family tradition, had committed himself to politics. In 1757, at the age of 25, he became justice of the peace for Westmoreland County. The following year, he moved up to the House of Burgesses and sat there until 1775. One of the first to oppose Britain, he early allied with Patrick Henry. As a protest93 against the Stamp Act (1765), Lee drew up the Westmoreland Association (1766), a nonimportation agreement signed by some of the citizens of his county. The next year, he denounced the Townshend Acts. And a year later he proposed in a letter to John Dickinson of Pennsylvania that the individual colonies set up committees to correspond with each other—an idea that did not come to fruition for 5 years.

Lee, following family tradition, had committed himself to politics. In 1757, at the age of 25, he became a justice of the peace for Westmoreland County. The next year, he was elected to the House of Burgesses and served there until 1775. One of the first to oppose Britain, he quickly allied with Patrick Henry. As a protest against the Stamp Act (1765), Lee created the Westmoreland Association (1766), a nonimportation agreement signed by some citizens of his county. The following year, he denounced the Townshend Acts. A year later, he proposed in a letter to John Dickinson of Pennsylvania that the individual colonies establish committees to communicate with each other—an idea that wouldn't be realized for another 5 years.

In 1769, when Lee and Henry penned an address to the King protesting several actions of Parliament, the Royal Governor disbanded the House of Burgesses. Lee thereupon met with other patriots at Raleigh’s Tavern and helped frame the Virginia Association, a nonimportation agreement. Many other colonies formed similar associations, but in 1770 Parliament repealed most of the duties and the protest spirit subsided.

In 1769, when Lee and Henry wrote a letter to the King protesting various actions by Parliament, the Royal Governor dissolved the House of Burgesses. Lee then gathered with other patriots at Raleigh’s Tavern and helped create the Virginia Association, a nonimportation agreement. Many other colonies established similar groups, but in 1770, Parliament canceled most of the duties, and the spirit of protest faded.

In March 1773, when anti-British feeling flared once again, Lee, Henry, and Jefferson, who had entered the House of Burgesses in 1769, organized a Virginia committee of correspondence and invited the other colonies to do likewise. Learning of the British closing of Boston Harbor in May 1774, they persuaded their colleagues to declare, as a protest, a day of fasting and prayer. The Royal Governor again dissolved the burgesses. The Revolutionaries reconvened at Raleigh’s Tavern, drew up a new nonimportation agreement, and resolved to appeal to the other colonies for an intercolonial congress. But, before such action could be taken, Virginia received an invitation from Massachusetts to send representatives to a congress to be held in September at Philadelphia—the First Continental Congress. Virginia’s first provincial assembly met in August and designated seven Delegates, including Lee and Henry.

In March 1773, when anti-British sentiment surged again, Lee, Henry, and Jefferson, who had joined the House of Burgesses in 1769, set up a Virginia committee of correspondence and invited the other colonies to do the same. After learning about the British closing of Boston Harbor in May 1774, they convinced their colleagues to declare a day of fasting and prayer as a form of protest. The Royal Governor dissolved the burgesses once more. The Revolutionaries gathered again at Raleigh’s Tavern, created a new nonimportation agreement, and decided to reach out to the other colonies for an intercolonial congress. However, before any action could be taken, Virginia received an invitation from Massachusetts to send representatives to a congress planned for September in Philadelphia—the First Continental Congress. Virginia’s first provincial assembly met in August and appointed seven Delegates, including Lee and Henry.

Lee’s outstanding congressional act was the introduction on June 7, 1776, of the resolution for independence from Britain, seconded by John Adams. This document, Lee’s condensed redraft of one forwarded him by a convention that had met in Williamsburg on May 15, proposed severing relations with Britain, the forming of foreign alliances, and preparation of a plan for confederation. On June 13, or 2 days after a committee was appointed to draft the Declaration, Lee journeyed back to Virginia, apparently because of illness in the family. He did not return and sign the Declaration until sometime subsequent to the formal ceremony on August 2. Like his brother Francis Lightfoot, in 1777 he also subscribed to the94 Articles of Confederation. After 1776, however, his influence in Congress waned, and 3 years later ill health forced his resignation.

Lee’s remarkable congressional achievement was presenting the resolution for independence from Britain on June 7, 1776, which was supported by John Adams. This document was Lee’s shortened version of one that had been sent to him by a convention that met in Williamsburg on May 15. It called for breaking away from Britain, forming foreign alliances, and preparing a plan for confederation. On June 13, two days after a committee was formed to draft the Declaration, Lee returned to Virginia, likely due to a family illness. He didn’t come back to sign the Declaration until sometime after the official ceremony on August 2. Like his brother Francis Lightfoot, he also endorsed the Articles of Confederation in 1777. However, after 1776, his influence in Congress diminished, and three years later, poor health forced him to resign.

As a State legislator (1780–84) Lee joined the conservative faction, which represented the interests of the large planters. A Member of Congress again in the period 1784–89, he served in 1784–85 as its President. In 1787, though elected to the Constitutional Convention, he refused to attend and led congressional opposition to the Constitution, especially because of the absence of a bill of rights. Although he was well aware of the deficiencies of the Articles of Confederation, he and others feared a stronger Central Government. Lee’s “Letters of the Federal Farmer to the Republican,” the collective title for two pamphlets outlining his objections to the Constitution, epitomized antifederalist sentiment.

As a state legislator from 1780 to 1784, Lee was part of the conservative group that represented the interests of large plantation owners. He returned to Congress from 1784 to 1789 and served as its President during 1784-85. In 1787, despite being elected to the Constitutional Convention, he chose not to attend and led the congressional opposition to the Constitution, mainly due to the lack of a bill of rights. Though he recognized the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, he and others were worried about a stronger central government. Lee’s “Letters of the Federal Farmer to the Republican,” the title for two pamphlets expressing his objections to the Constitution, summed up antifederalist feelings.

In 1789 Lee entered the U.S. Senate, but because of failing health resigned in 1792, the year after the Bill of Rights was incorporated into the Constitution. He died in 1794, aged 62, at Chantilly. His grave is in the Lee family cemetery near Hague, Virginia.

In 1789, Lee joined the U.S. Senate, but due to declining health, he resigned in 1792, the year after the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution. He passed away in 1794, at the age of 62, in Chantilly. His grave is located in the Lee family cemetery near Hague, Virginia.

95

95


Francis Lewis

NEW YORK

NYC

Few other signers felt the tragedy of the War for Independence more directly than Francis Lewis, whose wife died as a result of British imprisonment. To further the cause, he also expended a considerable portion of the fortune he had acquired as a merchant.

Few other signers experienced the tragedy of the War for Independence more personally than Francis Lewis, whose wife died due to British imprisonment. To support the cause, he also spent a large portion of the fortune he had made as a merchant.

Lewis was the only child of a minister. He was born in 1713 at Llandaff, Glamorganshire, Wales. Orphaned at an early age and raised by relatives, he studied at Westminster School in London and then took employment with a local firm. In 1738, deciding to go into business for himself, he set up branches in New York and Philadelphia and for a few years shuttled between those cities and northern European ports. In 1745 he married a New York girl, his partner’s sister.

Lewis was the only child of a minister. He was born in 1713 in Llandaff, Glamorganshire, Wales. Orphaned at a young age and raised by relatives, he went to Westminster School in London and then got a job with a local company. In 1738, he decided to start his own business, opening branches in New York and Philadelphia, and for a few years, he traveled back and forth between those cities and northern European ports. In 1745, he married a girl from New York, who was his partner’s sister.

During the French and Indian War, in 1756, while functioning as a clothing contractor for British troops at Fort Oswego, in present New York, Lewis was taken captive and sent to France for imprisonment. Upon his release, apparently in 1763, as a recompense the British Government awarded him a large land grant in America. He returned to New York City, reentered business, and quickly earned a fortune. In 1765 he retired to the village of Whitestone (now part of Flushing), on Long Island, but in 1771 he temporarily returned to New York City to help his son enter the business world, even probably making a voyage to England with him.

During the French and Indian War in 1756, while working as a clothing contractor for British troops at Fort Oswego in what is now New York, Lewis was captured and sent to France for imprisonment. After his release, likely in 1763, the British Government compensated him with a large land grant in America. He went back to New York City, got back into business, and quickly made a fortune. In 1765, he retired to the village of Whitestone (now part of Flushing) on Long Island, but in 1771, he temporarily returned to New York City to help his son start his career, possibly even making a trip to England with him.

Back home, Lewis devoted most of his energies to the Revolutionary movement, which he had joined in 1765 by attending the Stamp Act Congress. He was also likely one of the leaders of the New York Sons of Liberty. In 1774 he became a member of the New York Revolutionary committees of fifty-one and sixty, the next year attended the provincial convention, and subsequently helped set up the State government.

Back home, Lewis dedicated most of his efforts to the Revolutionary movement, which he joined in 1765 by going to the Stamp Act Congress. He was probably one of the leaders of the New York Sons of Liberty. In 1774, he became a member of the New York Revolutionary committees of fifty-one and sixty, attended the provincial convention the following year, and later helped establish the State government.

In the Continental Congress (1775–79), Lewis rarely took the floor but served on the marine, foreign affairs, and commerce committees, as well as sitting on the Board of Admiralty and engaging in troop supply matters. He defended Gen. George Washington from the attacks of the Conway Cabal. Because of Tory dominance in New York, Lewis and the other Delegates were instructed not to vote for independence on July 1 and 2, 1776, but Lewis signed the Declaration on August 2.

In the Continental Congress (1775–79), Lewis seldom spoke up but was a member of the marine, foreign affairs, and commerce committees. He also sat on the Board of Admiralty and worked on troop supply issues. He defended Gen. George Washington against the criticism from the Conway Cabal. Due to Tory influence in New York, Lewis and the other Delegates were told not to vote for independence on July 1 and 2, 1776, but Lewis signed the Declaration on August 2.

That same year, when the British invaded Long Island, they destroyed Lewis’ home in Whitestone and took his wife into custody. She was eventually released in an exchange for wives of British officials, but the hardships she had endured ruined her health and brought about her death in 1779. The grief-stricken Lewis immediately left Congress, but remained on the Board of Admiralty until96 1781, at which time he abandoned politics altogether. He lived in retirement with his sons, and died in 1802 at the age of 89 in New York City. He was buried there in an unmarked grave in the yard of Trinity Church.

That same year, when the British invaded Long Island, they destroyed Lewis' home in Whitestone and took his wife into custody. She was eventually released in exchange for the wives of British officials, but the hardships she endured ruined her health and led to her death in 1779. The grief-stricken Lewis immediately left Congress but stayed on the Board of Admiralty until96 1781, at which point he completely abandoned politics. He lived in retirement with his sons and died in 1802 at the age of 89 in New York City. He was buried there in an unmarked grave in the yard of Trinity Church.


Philip Livingston

NEW YORK

NYC

A member of the landed gentry, merchant Philip Livingston lived a princely life and devoted much energy to civic affairs and philanthropic enterprises. He was a conservative in politics, and at first opposed independence. On the other hand, despite wartime business reverses, he contributed generously to the Revolutionary effort and continued in public service until the day he died.

Philip Livingston, a wealthy merchant from the upper class, lived a luxurious life and spent a significant amount of his time on community activities and charitable initiatives. He was politically conservative and initially against independence. However, even though he encountered business difficulties during the war, he generously backed the Revolutionary cause and stayed engaged in public service until his death.

Livingston was the fifth son of Philip Livingston, second lord of Livingston Manor, of Scotch descent, and Catherine Van Brugh, of Dutch lineage. Young Livingston was born in 1716 at his father’s townhouse in Albany and spent most of his childhood there or at the family manor at Linlithgo, about 30 miles to the south.

Livingston was the fifth son of Philip Livingston, the second lord of Livingston Manor, who was of Scottish descent, and Catherine Van Brugh, who had Dutch ancestry. Young Livingston was born in 1716 at his father’s townhouse in Albany and spent most of his childhood either there or at the family manor in Linlithgo, located about 30 miles to the south.

Upon receiving a degree from Yale in 1737, Livingston entered the import business in New York City. Three years later, he married97 and moved into a townhouse on Duke Street in Manhattan; he was to sire five sons and four daughters. As time went on, he built up a fortune, particularly as a trader-privateer during the French and Indian War (1754–63). In 1764, though retaining his Duke Street home, he acquired a 40-acre estate on Brooklyn Heights overlooking the East River and New York Harbor.

Upon graduating from Yale in 1737, Livingston started working in the import business in New York City. Three years later, he got married97 and moved into a townhouse on Duke Street in Manhattan; he went on to have five sons and four daughters. As time passed, he built up a fortune, especially as a trader-privateer during the French and Indian War (1754–63). In 1764, while keeping his home on Duke Street, he bought a 40-acre estate on Brooklyn Heights overlooking the East River and New York Harbor.

While prospering as a merchant, Livingston devoted many of his energies to humanitarian and philanthropic endeavors. Among the organizations he fostered, financially aided, or helped administer were King’s College (later Columbia University), the New York Society Library, St. Andrew’s Society, the New York Chamber of Commerce, and New York Hospital.

While thriving as a merchant, Livingston committed much of his energy to humanitarian and philanthropic efforts. Among the organizations he supported, funded, or helped manage were King’s College (which later became Columbia University), the New York Society Library, St. Andrew’s Society, the New York Chamber of Commerce, and New York Hospital.

Livingston was also a proponent of political and religious freedom. As a New York City alderman (1754–63), he identified with the popular party that opposed the aristocratic ruling class of the colony. In a decade of service (1759–69) in the colonial legislature, he stood behind the Whigs in their quarrel with the Royal Governor and attended the Stamp Act Congress in 1765. But, a believer in the sort of dignified protests mounted by lawyers and merchants, he resented the riotous behavior of such groups as the Sons of Liberty.

Livingston was also a supporter of political and religious freedom. As an alderman in New York City (1754–63), he aligned with the popular party that opposed the aristocratic ruling class of the colony. During his ten years of service (1759–69) in the colonial legislature, he backed the Whigs in their conflict with the Royal Governor and attended the Stamp Act Congress in 1765. However, as someone who believed in dignified protests led by lawyers and merchants, he disapproved of the violent actions of groups like the Sons of Liberty.

The Brooklyn home of Philip Livingston from 1764 until his death in 1778. When the British occupied New York, they used it as a hospital. In 1811 fire destroyed it.

98 In the 1769 elections the Tories gained control of the legislature. In his bid for reelection, Livingston, fearful of the rise of extremism among the populace, attempted to unite the moderate factions. Defeated in New York City, which from then on was Tory-dominated, he managed to obtain reelection from the Livingston Manor district. The new assembly, claiming he could not represent an area in which he did not reside, unseated him.

98 In the 1769 elections, the Tories took control of the legislature. In his attempt to get reelected, Livingston, worried about the rise of extremism among the people, tried to bring together the moderate groups. After losing in New York City, which became Tory-dominated from that point on, he was able to get reelected from the Livingston Manor district. However, the new assembly, claiming he couldn't represent an area he didn't live in, removed him from office.

In 1774 Livingston became a member of the committee of fifty-one, an extralegal group that selected New York City Delegates to the Continental Congress, one of whom was Livingston. He also served on the committee of sixty, formed to enforce congressional enactments. The next year, he won election to the committee of one hundred, which governed New York City temporarily until the first provincial congress of the colony met later that year.

In 1774, Livingston joined a group of fifty-one, an unofficial committee that chose New York City delegates for the Continental Congress, one of whom was Livingston himself. He also served on a committee of sixty, established to implement congressional decisions. The following year, he was elected to the committee of one hundred, which temporarily governed New York City until the first provincial congress of the colony convened later that year.

Between 1774 and 1778 Livingston divided his time between the Continental Congress and the New York provincial assembly/legislature. In Congress he sat on committees dealing with marine, commerce, finance, military, and Indian matters. He was absent on July 1–2, 1776, perhaps on purpose even though the New York Delegates abstained from voting on the independence issue, but on August 2 he signed the Declaration.

Between 1774 and 1778, Livingston split his time between the Continental Congress and the New York provincial assembly/legislature. In Congress, he served on committees focused on marine, commerce, finance, military, and Indian affairs. He was absent on July 1–2, 1776, possibly intentionally, even though the New York Delegates chose not to vote on the independence issue. However, he signed the Declaration on August 2.

After their defeat in the Battle of Long Island (August 27, 1776), Washington and his officers met at Livingston’s residence in Brooklyn Heights and decided to evacuate the island. Subsequent to the ill-fated peace negotiations at Staten Island in September between Admiral Lord Richard Howe and three representatives of the Continental Congress, the British occupied New York City. They utilized Livingston’s Duke Street home as a barracks and his Brooklyn Heights residence as a Royal Navy hospital, as well as confiscating his business interests. He later sold some of his remaining property to sustain public credit. With the advance of the British, Livingston and his family had fled to Esopus (later Kingston), N.Y., where the State capital was temporarily located before moving to nearby Poughkeepsie.

After their defeat in the Battle of Long Island (August 27, 1776), Washington and his officers met at Livingston’s house in Brooklyn Heights and decided to evacuate the island. After the unsuccessful peace talks at Staten Island in September between Admiral Lord Richard Howe and three representatives of the Continental Congress, the British took control of New York City. They used Livingston’s Duke Street home as a barracks and his Brooklyn Heights residence as a Royal Navy hospital, in addition to taking over his business interests. He later sold some of his remaining property to keep public credit alive. As the British advanced, Livingston and his family fled to Esopus (later Kingston), N.Y., where the State capital was temporarily located before moving to nearby Poughkeepsie.

Livingston passed away at the age of 62 in 1778, the third earliest signer to die (after John Morton and Button Gwinnett). At the time, though in poor health, he was still in Congress, then meeting at York, Pa. He is buried in Prospect Hill Cemetery in that city.

Livingston died at 62 in 1778, making him the third earliest signer to pass away (after John Morton and Button Gwinnett). At that time, despite being in bad health, he was still a member of Congress, which was meeting in York, PA. He is buried in Prospect Hill Cemetery in that city.


99

99

Thomas Lynch, Jr.

SOUTH CAROLINA

S.C.

Like two of the three other South Carolina signers, Heyward and Middleton, Thomas Lynch, Jr., was an aristocratic planter. But, despite his wealth and social position, he experienced one of the most tragic lives of all the signers. He was stricken by illness in the midst of his political and military labors for his State, never fully recovered his health, and perished at sea in his 30th year. He died at a younger age than any other signer, though a couple succumbed at an earlier date. He was also the second youngest in the group, next to fellow South Carolinian Edward Rutledge.

Like two of the other three South Carolina signers, Heyward and Middleton, Thomas Lynch, Jr. was a wealthy planter. However, despite his wealth and social standing, he experienced one of the most tragic lives among the signers. He became ill while serving in politics and the military for his state, never fully recovered, and died at sea when he was just 29. He was younger than any other signer at his time of death, although a couple died earlier. He was also the second youngest in the group, after fellow South Carolinian Edward Rutledge.

The only son of Thomas Lynch, Sr., a rich rice planter, Lynch was born in 1749 at Hopsewee Plantation, located at Winyaw on the North Santee River in Prince George’s Parish (present Georgetown County), S.C. After attending the Indigo Society School at nearby Georgetown, from 1764 until 1772 he studied abroad at Eton and Cambridge and read law in London. Upon his return home, deciding not to engage in the law, he married and settled at Peach Tree Plantation. A gift from his father, it was situated in St. James Parish (present Charleston County) on the South Santee River about 4 miles south of Hopsewee.

The only son of Thomas Lynch, Sr., a wealthy rice planter, Lynch was born in 1749 at Hopsewee Plantation, located in Winyaw on the North Santee River in Prince George’s Parish (now Georgetown County), S.C. After attending the Indigo Society School in nearby Georgetown, he studied abroad at Eton and Cambridge from 1764 to 1772 and studied law in London. Upon returning home, he chose not to pursue a legal career, got married, and settled at Peach Tree Plantation. This plantation, a gift from his father, was located in St. James Parish (now Charleston County) on the South Santee River, about 4 miles south of Hopsewee.

As the heir of one of the most fervent Revolutionaries and influential men in the colony, Lynch naturally took a deep interest in politics and enjoyed strong support from the electorate. During the years 1774–76, while his father served in the Continental Congress, he labored on the home front, attending the first and second provincial congresses as well as the first State legislature and sitting on the State constitutional committee.

As the heir to one of the most passionate Revolutionaries and influential figures in the colony, Lynch naturally had a strong interest in politics and received significant support from voters. From 1774 to 1776, while his father was in the Continental Congress, he worked on the home front, participating in the first and second provincial congresses, as well as the first State legislature, and serving on the State constitutional committee.

In 1775, however, fate dealt Lynch a cruel blow. He accepted a captaincy in the First South Carolina Regiment of Continentals—to the dismay of his father who had hoped to use his position to obtain a higher rank for him. On a recruiting trip to North Carolina, young100 Lynch contracted bilious fever. This ended his military days and rendered him a partial invalid for his few remaining years.

In 1775, however, fate dealt Lynch a harsh blow. He accepted a captaincy in the First South Carolina Regiment of Continentals—much to his father's disappointment, who had hoped to leverage his position for a higher rank. During a recruiting trip to North Carolina, young100 Lynch contracted bilious fever. This put an end to his military career and left him partially disabled for the rest of his years.

Early in 1776 at Philadelphia the elder Lynch suffered a stroke that virtually incapacitated him for further public service. In the spring, his concerned colleagues in South Carolina elected his son to the Continental Congress, probably so that he could care for his father and act officially on his behalf. Although ill himself, Lynch made the onerous trip to Philadelphia. He stayed there throughout the summer, long enough to vote for and sign, at the age of 27, the Declaration of Independence. His father was unable to take part in the ceremony. The two were the only father-son team that served concurrently in the Continental Congress.

Early in 1776 in Philadelphia, the elder Lynch suffered a stroke that left him unable to continue his public service. In the spring, his worried colleagues in South Carolina elected his son to the Continental Congress, likely so he could take care of his father and represent him officially. Despite being ill himself, Lynch made the challenging journey to Philadelphia. He stayed there throughout the summer, long enough to vote for and sign the Declaration of Independence at the age of 27. His father couldn't participate in the ceremony. The two were the only father-son pair to serve together in the Continental Congress.

By the end of the year, the failing health of both men compelled them to start homeward. En route, at Annapolis, Md., a second stroke took the life of the senior Lynch. His son, broken in spirit and physically unable to continue in politics, retired to Peach Tree. Late in 1779 he and his wife, heading for southern France in an attempt to regain his health, boarded a ship bound for the West Indies that foundered. The couple died childless.

By the end of the year, the declining health of both men forced them to head home. On the way, in Annapolis, Md., a second stroke claimed the life of the senior Lynch. His son, devastated and unable to continue in politics, retired to Peach Tree. Later in 1779, he and his wife, trying to regain his health, boarded a ship bound for the West Indies that sank. The couple died without children.

101

101


Thomas McKean

DELAWARE

DELAWARE

Lawyer-jurist Thomas McKean stands out from the other signers in a variety of ways. He was the last to pen his signature to the Declaration, sometime after January 18, 1777. Although many Delegates simultaneously took part in State affairs, none did so as extensively as McKean—and he figured prominently in not one but two States, Delaware and Pennsylvania. He was also the only signer to be the chief executive of and concurrent officeholder in two States. Furthermore, he numbered among those who also subscribed to the Articles of Confederation, and he served a long tour in Congress.

Lawyer Thomas McKean is unique among the other signers in several ways. He was the last to sign the Declaration, doing so sometime after January 18, 1777. While many Delegates were involved in state matters, none were as engaged as McKean, who made significant contributions in both Delaware and Pennsylvania. He was also the only signer to serve as the chief executive and hold multiple positions in two states. Additionally, he was one of those who signed the Articles of Confederation and had a long tenure in Congress.

Of Scotch-Irish ancestry, McKean was born in 1734. He was the second son of a farmer-tavernkeeper who lived in New London Township, in Chester County, Pa., near the New Jersey and Delaware boundaries. After studying for 7 years at Rev. Francis Alison’s academy at nearby New London, McKean read law with a cousin at New Castle, Del. In 1754, at the age of 20, he was admitted to the Delaware bar and soon expanded his practice into Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Of Scotch-Irish descent, McKean was born in 1734. He was the second son of a farmer and tavern owner who lived in New London Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania, close to the borders of New Jersey and Delaware. After studying for seven years at Rev. Francis Alison’s academy in nearby New London, McKean studied law with a cousin in New Castle, Delaware. In 1754, at the age of 20, he was admitted to the Delaware bar and quickly broadened his practice to include Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

During the next two and a half decades, McKean occupied an array of appointive and elective offices in Delaware, some simultaneously: high sheriff of Kent County; militia captain; trustee of the loan office of New Castle County; customs collector and judge at New Castle; deputy attorney general of Sussex County; chief notary officer for the province; and clerk (1757–59) and member (1762–79) of the legislature, including the speakership of the lower house (1772–73). In 1762, he had also helped compile the colony’s laws.

During the next twenty-five years, McKean held various appointed and elected positions in Delaware, often at the same time: high sheriff of Kent County; militia captain; trustee of the loan office of New Castle County; customs collector and judge in New Castle; deputy attorney general of Sussex County; chief notary officer for the province; and clerk (1757–59) and member (1762–79) of the legislature, including serving as speaker of the lower house (1772–73). In 1762, he also helped compile the colony’s laws.

McKean’s Revolutionary tendencies had first revealed themselves during the Stamp Act (1765) controversy. He was one of the most vociferous of the delegates at the Stamp Act Congress. In 1774, a year after the death of his wife, whom he had wed in 1763, he remarried and established his home in Philadelphia. He nevertheless retained membership in the Delaware legislature, which that same year elected him to the Continental Congress. Except for the period December 1776-January 1778, when conservative opposition unseated him, he stayed there until 1783 and served as President for a few months in 1781. He played a key role in the Revolutionary program, at the same time fostering the establishment of governments in Delaware and Pennsylvania.

McKean's revolutionary tendencies first showed during the Stamp Act (1765) controversy. He was one of the most vocal delegates at the Stamp Act Congress. In 1774, a year after his wife's death, whom he had married in 1763, he remarried and set up his home in Philadelphia. However, he kept his position in the Delaware legislature, which elected him to the Continental Congress that same year. Except for the period from December 1776 to January 1778, when conservative opposition removed him, he remained there until 1783 and served as President for a few months in 1781. He played a crucial role in the Revolutionary program while also promoting the formation of governments in Delaware and Pennsylvania.

Furthermore, it was McKean who was responsible for breaking the Delaware tie in the congressional vote for independence. On July 1, 1776, date of the first vote, the two Delaware representatives present, McKean and George Read, deadlocked. McKean, who had balloted affirmatively, dispatched an urgent message to the third Delegate, Caesar Rodney, who was at his home near Dover, Del., on military matters, to rush to Philadelphia. Rodney, making an 80-mile horseback ride through a storm, arrived just in time to swing Delaware over to independence on July 2.

Furthermore, it was McKean who broke the Delaware tie in the congressional vote for independence. On July 1, 1776, the date of the first vote, the two Delaware representatives present, McKean and George Read, were deadlocked. McKean, who had voted in favor, sent an urgent message to the third Delegate, Caesar Rodney, who was at his home near Dover, Del., dealing with military matters, to hurry to Philadelphia. Rodney, making an 80-mile horseback ride through a storm, arrived just in time to swing Delaware in favor of independence on July 2.

During the hiatus in his congressional career, from late 1776 until early in 1778, McKean had remained in the lower house of the102 Delaware legislature, of which he became speaker once again. In that capacity, in September-November 1777, he temporarily replaced the president of Delaware, whom the British had captured. In vain they also pursued McKean, who was forced to move his family several times. Meantime, in July, he had been appointed chief justice of the Pennsylvania Superior Court, a position he was to hold for 22 years.

During his break from Congress, from late 1776 to early 1778, McKean stayed in the lower house of the 102 Delaware legislature, where he once again became speaker. In that role, from September to November 1777, he temporarily took over for the president of Delaware, who had been captured by the British. They also tried to capture McKean, forcing him to move his family several times. In July, he was appointed chief justice of the Pennsylvania Superior Court, a position he would hold for 22 years.

After 1783, when his congressional service ended, McKean focused his political activities in Pennsylvania. As a Federalist, in 1787 he was instrumental in that State’s ratification of the U.S. Constitution. In the State constitutional convention of 1789–90 he demonstrated mistrust of popular government. During the 1790’s, disenchanted with Federalist foreign policy, he switched to the Democratic-Republicans.

After 1783, when his time in Congress ended, McKean concentrated his political work in Pennsylvania. As a Federalist, he played a key role in the state's ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1787. At the state constitutional convention from 1789 to 1790, he showed his distrust of popular government. During the 1790s, frustrated with Federalist foreign policy, he switched to the Democratic-Republicans.

While Governor for three terms (1799–1808), McKean was the storm center of violent partisan warfare. Although he exercised strong leadership and advanced education and internal improvements, his imperiousness infuriated the Federalists, alienated many members of his own party, and resulted in an attempt to impeach him. Especially controversial were his rigid employment of the spoils system, including the appointment of friends and relatives, and his refusal to call a convention to revise the constitution. As a result, he won reelection only with the support of members of both parties who opposed the revision.

While serving as governor for three terms (1799–1808), McKean was at the center of intense partisan conflict. Even though he provided strong leadership and promoted education and infrastructure improvements, his overbearing nature annoyed the Federalists, caused many in his own party to turn against him, and led to an attempt to impeach him. His strict use of the spoils system, which included appointing friends and family, and his refusal to convene a group to revise the constitution were particularly controversial. As a result, he only managed to win reelection with the backing of members from both parties who were against the revision.

McKean lived out his life quietly in Philadelphia. He died in 1817 at the age of 83, survived by his second wife and four of the 11 children from his two marriages. He was buried in Laurel Hill Cemetery. His substantial estate consisted of stocks, bonds, and huge tracts of land in Pennsylvania.

McKean lived a quiet life in Philadelphia. He passed away in 1817 at the age of 83, leaving behind his second wife and four of his 11 children from two marriages. He was buried in Laurel Hill Cemetery. His considerable estate included stocks, bonds, and large parcels of land in Pennsylvania.


103

103

Arthur Middleton

SOUTH CAROLINA

S.C.

Despite long years of study in England, exceptional wealth, and social eminence, Arthur Middleton evolved into an avid Revolutionary. Because of preoccupation with State matters, particularly military defense, his attendance in Congress was spasmodic. The British captured him during their attack on Charleston and ravished his estate.

Even after many years of studying in England, having significant wealth, and holding a high social position, Arthur Middleton became a dedicated Revolutionary. Because he was focused on government issues, particularly military defense, he only occasionally attended Congress. The British captured him during their attack on Charleston and plundered his estate.

Middleton was born in 1742 at Middleton Place, the family estate on the Ashley River near Charleston. His father, who owned a score of plantations comprising 50,000 acres and employing some 800 slaves, ranked among the wealthiest and most politically active men in the province. While still a young boy, Arthur sailed to England for an education. He attended Hackney School, graduated from Cambridge University, and studied law in London. In 1764, the year after his return, he wed the woman who was to bear him nine children, and embarked on a career as justice of the peace and colonial legislator. In the years 1768–71, however, he and his wife made an extended tour of Europe.

Middleton was born in 1742 at Middleton Place, the family estate on the Ashley River near Charleston. His father owned numerous plantations covering 50,000 acres and employing about 800 slaves, making him one of the wealthiest and most politically active men in the province. As a young boy, Arthur sailed to England for his education. He attended Hackney School, graduated from Cambridge University, and studied law in London. In 1764, the year after his return, he married the woman who would give him nine children and began his career as a justice of the peace and a colonial legislator. However, from 1768 to 1771, he and his wife took an extended tour of Europe.

Reelected the next year to the legislature, Middleton joined the Revolutionaries in their campaign against the Royal Governor. While sitting in the first and second provincial assemblies (1775–76), Middleton aided in organizing a night raid on public arms stores at Charleston before the Governor could seize them, raised money for armed resistance, recommended defense measures for Charleston Harbor, served on the council of safety, and urged tight enforcement of the Continental Association. An extremist, he advocated the tarring and feathering of Loyalists and confiscation of the estates of those who had fled the country.

Reelected the following year to the legislature, Middleton joined the Revolutionaries in their fight against the Royal Governor. While serving in the first and second provincial assemblies (1775–76), Middleton helped organize a night raid on public armories in Charleston before the Governor could take them, raised funds for armed resistance, suggested defense strategies for Charleston Harbor, served on the council of safety, and pushed for strict enforcement of the Continental Association. An extremist, he supported the tarring and feathering of Loyalists and the seizure of the estates of those who had escaped the country.

104 In 1776, while engaged in helping draft a State constitution, Middleton was chosen to replace his more conservative father in the Continental Congress. Two years later, when young Middleton declined reelection, he also rejected an offer of the governorship of South Carolina by the legislature, which had enacted a new constitution that he opposed. In 1779 and 1780, though reelected to the Continental Congress, Middleton failed to attend, probably because of concern over the British threat to his State. While serving in the militia during the siege of Charleston in 1780, along with fellow signers Heyward and Rutledge he was captured by the British and imprisoned at St. Augustine, Fla., until July 1781.

104 In 1776, while helping to draft a state constitution, Middleton was chosen to take his more conservative father's place in the Continental Congress. Two years later, when young Middleton turned down reelection, he also declined an offer from the legislature for the governorship of South Carolina, which had enacted a new constitution that he disagreed with. In 1779 and 1780, even though he was reelected to the Continental Congress, Middleton didn’t show up, likely due to worries about the British threat to his state. While serving in the militia during the siege of Charleston in 1780, he was captured by the British along with fellow signers Heyward and Rutledge, and they were imprisoned in St. Augustine, Florida, until July 1781.

Two months later, Middleton returned to Congress and served throughout 1782. He then retired to Middleton Place, which had been ravaged by the British. He rehabilitated it, resumed his life as a planter, sat intermittently in the State legislature, and accepted assignment as one of the original trustees of the College of Charleston. He died in 1787 at the age of 44. His remains rest at Middleton Place.

Two months later, Middleton went back to Congress and served throughout 1782. He then retired to Middleton Place, which had been damaged by the British. He restored it, went back to his life as a planter, occasionally served in the State legislature, and took on the role of one of the original trustees of the College of Charleston. He passed away in 1787 at the age of 44. His remains are at Middleton Place.

105

105


Lewis Morris

NEW YORK

NYC

Although Lewis Morris was a wealthy landowner who enjoyed the prestige of the social elite, he represented the patriot element in Tory-dominated New York. The British sacked his estate during the war, and his three eldest sons fought under Washington.

Even though Lewis Morris was a rich landowner who had the respect of high society, he stood for the patriotic side in Tory-controlled New York. The British plundered his estate during the war, and his three oldest sons fought alongside Washington.

Born in 1726, Morris was the eldest son of the second lord of the vast manor of Morrisania, in Westchester (present Bronx) County, N.Y. Upon graduating from Yale College in 1746, he helped manage the estate. Three years later, he married, siring 10 children. In 1762, when his father died, he inherited Morrisania and became its third lord. About this time, he gained an interest in local politics, and in 1769 served a term in the colonial legislature.

Born in 1726, Morris was the oldest son of the second lord of the large manor of Morrisania, in Westchester (now the Bronx) County, N.Y. After graduating from Yale College in 1746, he helped run the estate. Three years later, he got married and had 10 children. In 1762, when his father passed away, he inherited Morrisania and became its third lord. Around this time, he became interested in local politics, and in 1769 he served a term in the colonial legislature.

As time went on, though residing in a pro-Loyalist county, Morris became increasingly critical of British policy. In 1775 he helped organize a meeting at White Plains that overcame strong opposition and chose county delegates, including Morris as chairman, to New York’s first provincial convention. It elected him to the Continental Congress (1775–77), where he specialized in military and Indian affairs. For most of 1776, he was absent from Philadelphia, serving as a brigadier general in the Westchester County militia. During the British invasion of New York that year, the redcoats ravaged Morrisania, and forced Morris’ family to flee.

As time passed, despite living in a pro-Loyalist county, Morris became more critical of British policy. In 1775, he helped organize a meeting at White Plains that overcame strong opposition and appointed county delegates, with Morris as chairman, to New York’s first provincial convention. He was elected to the Continental Congress (1775–77), where he focused on military and Native American issues. For most of 1776, he was away from Philadelphia, serving as a brigadier general in the Westchester County militia. During the British invasion of New York that year, the redcoats devastated Morrisania, forcing Morris' family to flee.

When his career in Congress ended, Morris rose to the rank of major general in the militia and became a county judge (1777–78) and State senator (1777–81 and 1784–88). After war’s end in 1783, when he was able to return to Morrisania, he devoted much of his time to rehabilitating it. In 1784 he sat on the first board of regents of the University of New York. And 4 years later, at the State ratifying convention in Poughkeepsie, he strongly supported Alexander Hamilton’s successful drive for approval of the U.S. Constitution.

When his time in Congress ended, Morris was promoted to major general in the militia and became a county judge (1777–78) and a state senator (1777–81 and 1784–88). After the war ended in 1783, he returned to Morrisania and dedicated much of his time to restoring it. In 1784, he was part of the first board of regents for the University of New York. Four years later, at the state ratifying convention in Poughkeepsie, he strongly backed Alexander Hamilton’s successful push for the approval of the U.S. Constitution.

Morris died in 1798 at Morrisania at the age of 71. His grave is in the family vault in the yard of St. Ann’s Church in the Bronx.

Morris died in 1798 in Morrisania at the age of 71. His grave is in the family vault in the yard of St. Ann’s Church in the Bronx.


106

106

Robbert Morris

PENNSYLVANIA

PENNSYLVANIA

Merchant Robert Morris was a man of many distinctions. One of the wealthiest individuals in the Colonies and an economic wizard, he won the accolade “Financier of the Revolution,” yet died penniless and forgotten. He and Roger Sherman were the only signers of all three of the Nation’s basic documents: the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, and Constitution. Morris, who turned down appointment as the first Secretary of the Treasury, also served as a Senator in the First Congress.

Merchant Robert Morris was a man of many achievements. He was one of the wealthiest individuals in the Colonies and a financial prodigy, earning the nickname "Financier of the Revolution," but he died poor and unrecognized. He and Roger Sherman were the only signers of all three of the nation’s foundational documents: the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution. Morris, who declined the position of the first Secretary of the Treasury, also served as a Senator in the First Congress.

Morris was born in or near Liverpool, England, in 1734. At the age of 13, he emigrated to Maryland to join his father, a tobacco exporter at Oxford, Md. After brief schooling at Philadelphia, the youth obtained employment with Thomas and Charles Willing’s well-known shipping firm. In 1754 he became a partner, and for almost four decades was one of the company’s directors as well as one of Philadelphia’s most influential citizens. Marrying in 1769 at the age of 35, he fathered five sons and two daughters.

Morris was born in or near Liverpool, England, in 1734. At 13, he moved to Maryland to join his father, who was a tobacco exporter in Oxford, Md. After a short time in school in Philadelphia, he got a job with the famous shipping company run by Thomas and Charles Willing. In 1754, he became a partner, and for nearly 40 years, he was one of the company’s directors and one of Philadelphia’s most influential residents. He got married in 1769 at 35 years old and had five sons and two daughters.

During the Stamp Act turmoil in 1765, Morris had joined other merchants in protest, but not until the outbreak of hostilities a decade hence did he fully commit himself to the Revolution. In 1775 the Continental Congress contracted with his firm to import arms and ammunition; and he was elected to the Pennsylvania council of safety (1775–76), the committee of correspondence, the provincial assembly (1775–76), the State legislature (1776–78), and the Continental Congress (1775–78). In the latter body, on July 1, 1776, he voted against independence, which he personally considered premature, but the next day purposely absented himself to facilitate an affirmative ballot by his State.

During the turmoil of the Stamp Act in 1765, Morris joined other merchants in protest, but he didn't fully commit to the Revolution until the hostilities broke out a decade later. In 1775, the Continental Congress hired his firm to import arms and ammunition, and he was elected to the Pennsylvania council of safety (1775–76), the committee of correspondence, the provincial assembly (1775–76), the State legislature (1776–78), and the Continental Congress (1775–78). In the latter body, on July 1, 1776, he voted against independence, which he personally thought was premature, but the next day he purposely stayed away to help ensure a positive vote from his State.

Morris, a key Member of Congress, specialized in financial affairs and military procurement. Although he and his firm profited handsomely,107 had it not been for his assiduous labors the Continental Army would probably have needed to demobilize. He worked closely with General Washington, wheedled money and supplies from the States, borrowed money in the face of overwhelming difficulties, and on occasion even obtained personal loans to further the war cause. Immediately following his congressional service, Morris sat for two more terms in the Pennsylvania legislature in the period 1778–81. During this time, Thomas Paine and others attacked him for profiteering in Congress, which investigated his accounts and vindicated him. Nevertheless, his reputation slipped.

Morris, a key Member of Congress, focused on financial matters and military procurement. Although he and his firm made significant profits, had it not been for his hard work, the Continental Army likely would have had to disband. He collaborated closely with General Washington, secured money and supplies from the States, borrowed funds amid overwhelming challenges, and even occasionally took out personal loans to support the war effort. Right after his congressional service, Morris served two additional terms in the Pennsylvania legislature from 1778 to 1781. During this period, Thomas Paine and others criticized him for profiting while in Congress, leading to an investigation of his accounts, which ultimately cleared him. However, his reputation still declined.

In 1794 Robert Morris began building this palatial townhouse in Philadelphia. After his imprisonment for debt in 1798, the unfinished house came to be known as “Morris’ Folly.” It stood until 1800.

Morris embarked on the most dramatic phase of his career by accepting the office of Superintendent of Finance (1781–84) under the Articles of Confederation. Congress, recognizing the perilous state of the Nation’s finances and its impotence to remedy it, granted him dictatorial powers and acquiesced to his condition that he be108 allowed to continue his private commercial enterprises. He slashed all governmental and military expenditures, personally purchased Army and Navy supplies, tightened accounting procedures, prodded the States to fulfill quotas of money and supplies, and when necessary strained his personal credit by issuing notes over his own signature or borrowing from friends.

Morris entered the most intense period of his career by taking the position of Superintendent of Finance (1781–84) under the Articles of Confederation. Congress, aware of the dangerous state of the nation’s finances and its inability to fix it, granted him extraordinary powers and agreed to his condition that he could continue his private business ventures. He cut all government and military spending, personally bought supplies for the Army and Navy, improved accounting practices, urged the states to meet their money and supply quotas, and when necessary stretched his personal credit by issuing notes with his own signature or borrowing from friends.

To finance Washington’s Yorktown campaign in 1781, in addition to the above techniques Morris obtained a sizable loan from France. He used part of it, along with some of his own fortune, to organize the Bank of North America, chartered that December. The first Government-incorporated bank in the United States, it aided war financing.

To fund Washington’s Yorktown campaign in 1781, in addition to the methods mentioned above, Morris secured a large loan from France. He used part of this loan, along with some of his own wealth, to establish the Bank of North America, which was chartered that December. It was the first government-incorporated bank in the United States and helped with financing the war.

Although Morris was reelected to the Pennsylvania legislature in 1785–86, his private commercial ventures consumed most of his time. In the latter year, he attended the Annapolis Convention, and the following year the Constitutional Convention, where he sympathized with the Federalists. In 1789, declining Washington’s offer of appointment as the first Secretary of the Treasury, he took instead a senatorial seat in Congress (1789–95).

Although Morris was reelected to the Pennsylvania legislature in 1785–86, he spent most of his time on his private business ventures. In the latter year, he went to the Annapolis Convention, and the next year he attended the Constitutional Convention, where he aligned himself with the Federalists. In 1789, he turned down Washington’s offer to be the first Secretary of the Treasury and instead accepted a seat in the Senate (1789–95).

During the later years of his public life, Morris speculated wildly, often on overextended credit, in lands in the West and at the site of Washington, D.C. To compound his difficulties, in 1794 he began constructing on Philadelphia’s Chestnut Street a palatial townhouse designed by Maj. Pierre Charles L’Enfant. Not long thereafter, Morris attempted to escape creditors by retreating to The Hills, the country estate along the Schuylkill River on the edge of Philadelphia that he had acquired in 1770.

During the later years of his public life, Morris took risks and speculated heavily, often on borrowed money, in lands in the West and at the site of Washington, D.C. To make matters worse, in 1794 he started building an extravagant townhouse on Chestnut Street in Philadelphia, designed by Maj. Pierre Charles L’Enfant. Shortly after that, Morris tried to avoid his creditors by retreating to The Hills, the country estate he had bought in 1770 along the Schuylkill River at the edge of Philadelphia.

Arrested at the behest of creditors in 1798 and forced to abandon completion of the townhouse, henceforth known in its unfinished state as “Morris’ Folly,” Morris was thrown into the Philadelphia debtors’ prison, where he was well treated. Nevertheless, by the time he was released in 1801, under a Federal bankruptcy law, his property and fortune had vanished, his health deteriorated, and his spirit been broken. He lingered on amid poverty and obscurity, living in a simple Philadelphia home on an annuity Gouverneur Morris had obtained for his wife. He died in 1806 in his 72d year. He was buried in the yard of Christ Church.

Arrested at the request of creditors in 1798 and forced to stop working on the townhouse, which would later be called "Morris’ Folly," Morris ended up in the Philadelphia debtors’ prison, where he was treated well. However, by the time he was released in 1801 under a Federal bankruptcy law, his property and wealth were gone, his health had worsened, and his spirit was broken. He lived on in poverty and obscurity, residing in a modest home in Philadelphia on an annuity Gouverneur Morris had secured for his wife. He passed away in 1806 at the age of 72. He was buried in the yard of Christ Church.


109

109

John Morton

PENNSYLVANIA

Pennsylvania

John Morton, one of the nine signers from Pennsylvania, is better known there than in the Nation, but he rendered meritorious service to both. He cast the decisive ballot that swung his State over to an affirmative vote for independence in the Continental Congress. He was the first signer to die.

John Morton, one of the nine signers from Pennsylvania, is more recognized locally than nationally, but he made significant contributions to both. He cast the pivotal vote that secured his state's support for independence in the Continental Congress. He was the first signer to die.

Morton was born of Finnish-Swedish descent in 1725, shortly after the death of his father, on a farm in Ridley Township, Chester (present Delaware) County. John Sketchley, an Englishman who subsequently married the widowed mother of the youth, reared and educated him. Their relationship was apparently close, for Morton later named his eldest son Sketchley. The stepfather, learned in mathematics, taught the boy the three R’s as well as surveying. He practiced that profession on and off all his life, as well as farming, politics, and jurisprudence. He married in his early 20’s, in 1748 or 1749, and fathered five daughters and four sons.

Morton was born of Finnish-Swedish descent in 1725, shortly after his father's death, on a farm in Ridley Township, Chester (now Delaware) County. John Sketchley, an Englishman who later married Morton's widowed mother, raised and educated him. Their bond was clearly strong, as Morton eventually named his eldest son Sketchley. The stepfather, knowledgeable in mathematics, taught the boy the basics as well as surveying. Morton practiced surveying on and off throughout his life, along with farming, politics, and law. He got married in his early 20s, around 1748 or 1749, and had five daughters and four sons.

At the age of 30, Morton entered politics, which from then on absorbed most of his energies. From 1756 until a few months before he died in 1777, he served 18 terms in the colonial/State legislature (1756–66 and 1769–76), which he presided over during the last year and a half. In 1774 he won appointment as an associate justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

At 30, Morton got into politics, which took up most of his energy from that point on. From 1756 until a few months before he died in 1777, he served 18 terms in the colonial/State legislature (1756–66 and 1769–76), leading it during the last year and a half. In 1774, he was appointed as an associate justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Meantime, despite his rise in State circles, Morton had always110 maintained strong ties with his own county. He resided there all his life, remained active in civic and church affairs, and stayed close to the people. Between terms of office as county justice of the peace (1757–64 and 1770–74), he worked in a tour as sheriff (1766–69).

Meantime, even with his rise in State circles, Morton always110 kept strong connections to his own county. He lived there his whole life, stayed active in community and church activities, and remained close to the people. Between his terms as county justice of the peace (1757–64 and 1770–74), he served a term as sheriff (1766–69).

Morton’s service to the Nation began in 1765, while he was a member of the Pennsylvania legislature. He and two colleagues represented the colony at the Stamp Act Congress in New York. His most dramatic act as Delegate to the Continental Congress (1774–77), in which he numbered among the moderates, was his sudden and crucial switch on July 1, 1776, to the side of his friend Benjamin Franklin and James Wilson in the vote for national independence. On the final vote the next day, these three ballots outweighed those of Thomas Willing and Charles Humphreys. Robert Morris and John Dickinson being purposely absent, Pennsylvania registered a “yea.” Less glamorously, Morton was a member of many committees, in 1777 chairing the committee of the whole on the adoption of the Articles of Confederation, finally ratified after his death.

Morton’s service to the nation started in 1765 when he was a member of the Pennsylvania legislature. He and two colleagues represented the colony at the Stamp Act Congress in New York. His most significant moment as a delegate to the Continental Congress (1774–77), where he counted himself among the moderates, was his sudden and important switch on July 1, 1776, to support his friend Benjamin Franklin and James Wilson in the vote for national independence. In the final vote the next day, these three ballots outweighed those of Thomas Willing and Charles Humphreys. Robert Morris and John Dickinson were purposely absent, allowing Pennsylvania to register a “yes.” Less dramatically, Morton was part of many committees, and in 1777, he chaired the committee of the whole on the adoption of the Articles of Confederation, which were finally ratified after his death.

Within a year of signing the Declaration, in the spring of 1777, Morton fell ill and died on his farm at the age of 51. A few months earlier, he had bequeathed his land and property, including a few slaves, to his wife and five daughters and three surviving sons. But he could not will them security; shortly after his demise they had to flee from their home in the face of an imminent British attack. Morton’s grave is located in Old St. Paul’s Cemetery in Chester, Pa.

Within a year of signing the Declaration, in the spring of 1777, Morton became ill and died on his farm at the age of 51. A few months earlier, he had passed on his land and property, which included a few slaves, to his wife and five daughters and three surviving sons. But he couldn’t provide them with safety; shortly after he died, they had to escape from their home due to an impending British attack. Morton’s grave is located in Old St. Paul’s Cemetery in Chester, Pa.

111

111


Thomas Nelson, Jr.

VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA

Thomas Nelson, Jr., a rich planter-merchant who at one time owned more than 400 slaves, was one of the most active of the Virginia patriots. Mainly because of health problems, however, his career in Congress was brief and undistinguished, though he made great financial sacrifices during the war and won fame as a militia commander and State politician.

Thomas Nelson, Jr. was a wealthy plantation owner and merchant who once owned more than 400 slaves. He was one of the most involved Virginia patriots. However, because of health problems, his time in Congress was brief and not particularly distinguished, although he made considerable financial sacrifices during the war and earned recognition as a militia leader and state politician.

The eldest of five sons, Nelson was born at Yorktown, Va., in 1738. At the age of 14, he sailed to England to supplement his initial tutorial education. In 1761, after graduating from Hackney School and Cambridge University, he returned to Virginia to help his father manage his plantation and mercantile business. The next year, young Nelson married; he and his wife were to have 11 children.

The oldest of five sons, Nelson was born in Yorktown, Virginia, in 1738. At 14, he traveled to England to enhance his early education. In 1761, after graduating from Hackney School and Cambridge University, he returned to Virginia to assist his father in running his plantation and business. The following year, young Nelson got married; he and his wife would go on to have 11 children.

In 1764 Nelson became a justice of the peace for York County and entered the House of Burgesses. He served in the house until May 1774, when Royal Governor Lord Dunmore, provoked at its protests over the Boston Port Act, dissolved it. That year and the next, Nelson attended three of the Virginia provincial assemblies, where he worked closely with Patrick Henry. The last assembly elected Nelson to the Continental Congress, at which time he resigned his colonelcy in the Virginia militia.

In 1764, Nelson became a justice of the peace for York County and joined the House of Burgesses. He served in the house until May 1774, when Royal Governor Lord Dunmore, angered by its protests against the Boston Port Act, dissolved it. That year and the following one, Nelson attended three of the Virginia provincial assemblies, where he collaborated closely with Patrick Henry. The last assembly elected Nelson to the Continental Congress, at which point he stepped down from his position as a colonel in the Virginia militia.

In Congress, Nelson was outspoken in his desire to sever the bonds with England. He journeyed to Virginia in the spring of 1776. At a convention held in Williamsburg in May, he introduced and won approval for a resolution recommending national independence, drafted by Edmund Pendleton. Nelson carried it to Philadelphia and presented it to Richard Henry Lee, who redrafted and condensed it into his June 7 resolution. Not long afterward, Nelson’s health began to decline. Subsequently, he divided his time between Philadelphia and Virginia, and in the spring of 1777 resigned from Congress.

In Congress, Nelson was vocal about his wish to break away from England. He traveled to Virginia in the spring of 1776. At a convention in Williamsburg in May, he introduced and got approval for a resolution urging national independence, which was drafted by Edmund Pendleton. Nelson took it to Philadelphia and presented it to Richard Henry Lee, who reworked and shortened it into his June 7 resolution. Shortly after, Nelson's health started to decline. After that, he split his time between Philadelphia and Virginia, and in the spring of 1777, he resigned from Congress.

Back in Virginia, Nelson was awarded the rank of brigadier general in the militia and was elected to the lower house of the legislature. In the spring of 1778 Congress appealed to men of means in the Colonies to form troops of light cavalry. Nelson, partially at his own expense, raised, outfitted, and trained such a unit. In July he marched it northward to Philadelphia. The next month, Congress decided it was not needed and it returned home.

Back in Virginia, Nelson was given the rank of brigadier general in the militia and was elected to the lower house of the legislature. In the spring of 1778, Congress reached out to wealthy individuals in the Colonies to form light cavalry troops. Nelson, mostly at his own cost, raised, equipped, and trained such a unit. In July, he marched it north to Philadelphia. The following month, Congress decided it wasn't needed, and it returned home.

Nelson served in Congress again for a short time in 1779, but poor health forced him to retire once more. Nevertheless, the next year he obtained munitions and supplies for the militia, commanded troops, attended the legislature, and raised money to help subsidize the war. He was particularly effective in soliciting funds from wealthy plantation owners, to whom he pledged to repay the loans personally if the State should fail to do so.

Nelson returned to Congress for a brief period in 1779, but his health issues forced him to step back again. However, the following year, he secured weapons and supplies for the militia, led troops, participated in the legislature, and raised funds to support the war. He was especially successful in getting financial contributions from wealthy plantation owners, promising to personally repay the loans if the State was unable to.

When the British invaded Virginia in 1780–81, civilian control seriously hampered Nelson’s effectiveness as a militia commander.112 Consequently, in the latter year the legislature elected him as Governor and granted him powers approaching those of a military dictator. Although still bothered by bad health, he kept the government intact and strengthened defenses. In September-October 1781, while taking part in the Yorktown siege, according to family tradition he ordered troops to shell his own mansion when he learned it was a British headquarters. Soon after the victory at Yorktown, overwhelmed by the burdens of office and still in poor physical condition, he resigned the governorship.

When the British invaded Virginia in 1780–81, civilian control really limited Nelson’s effectiveness as a militia commander.112 As a result, in the latter year, the legislature elected him as Governor and gave him powers similar to those of a military dictator. Even though he was still struggling with health issues, he kept the government running and reinforced defenses. In September-October 1781, while participating in the Yorktown siege, family tradition says he ordered troops to bombard his own mansion when he discovered it was being used as a British headquarters. Shortly after the victory at Yorktown, overwhelmed by the responsibilities of the office and still in poor health, he resigned as governor.

This painting commemorates one of the highlights of the siege of Yorktown (1781). Thomas Nelson, Jr., commander in chief of Virginia troops, took an active part.

That same year, Nelson partially retired to Offley Hoo, a modest estate in Hanover County that his father had willed to him on his death in 1772. In financial distress from his wartime sacrifices, the younger Nelson lacked money to renovate his Yorktown home, where he had lived since 1767. Except for occasional tours in the legislature and visits to Yorktown, he devoted the rest of his life to his business affairs. He died at Offley Hoo in 1789 at the age of 50. His grave is at Yorktown in the yard of Grace Episcopal Church.

That same year, Nelson partially retired to Offley Hoo, a modest estate in Hanover County that his father had left to him when he died in 1772. Struggling financially due to his sacrifices during the war, the younger Nelson didn't have the money to renovate his Yorktown home, where he had lived since 1767. Aside from occasional stints in the legislature and visits to Yorktown, he spent the rest of his life focused on his business affairs. He died at Offley Hoo in 1789 at the age of 50. His grave is located at Yorktown in the yard of Grace Episcopal Church.


113

113

William Paca

MARYLAND

MARYLAND

William Paca was one of the earliest Revolutionaries in a conservative colony. A wealthy planter and eminent lawyer and judge, he held numerous State offices, including the governorship, but his role in national affairs was limited.

William Paca was one of the initial Revolutionaries in a conservative colony. As a wealthy planter and a respected lawyer and judge, he held various state positions, including governor, but his role in national issues was minimal.

The second son of a prominent planter-landowner, Paca was born, probably of Italian descent, in 1740 at Chilbury Hall, near Abingdon in Harford County, Md. He received his early education from private tutors and at the age of 15 matriculated at the College of Philadelphia (later part of the University of Pennsylvania). Upon graduating, he studied with an attorney in Annapolis and read law in London. In 1763, the year before initiating his practice in the former city, he married a local girl from a wealthy family and began building a home, completed 2 years later. When in the country, he resided at Wye Plantation, in Queen Annes County, which he had purchased about 1760.

The second son of a well-known plantation owner, Paca was likely of Italian descent and was born in 1740 at Chilbury Hall, near Abingdon in Harford County, Maryland. He was educated by private tutors and at 15, he enrolled at the College of Philadelphia (which later became part of the University of Pennsylvania). After graduating, he studied law with an attorney in Annapolis and also read law in London. In 1763, the year before he started his practice in Annapolis, he married a local girl from a wealthy family and began building a home, which was finished two years later. While in the country, he lived at Wye Plantation in Queen Anne's County, which he had bought around 1760.

In 1768 Paca won a seat in the colonial legislature, where he soon alined himself with Samuel Chase and other Whigs in protesting the powers of the Proprietary Governor. In the early 1770’s Paca joined other Maryland patriots in urging governmental regulation of fees paid to civil officers and in opposing the poll tax, used to pay the salaries of Anglican clergy, representing the established church. In 1773 he became a member of the Maryland committee of correspondence.114 The following year, along with Samuel Chase and Thomas Johnson, he acted as counsel for fellow legislator Joseph H. Harrison, who had been jailed for refusing to pay the poll tax. All three men also attended the first provincial convention that same year and received appointments to the First Continental Congress. About this time, Paca’s wife died.

In 1768, Paca won a seat in the colonial legislature, where he quickly teamed up with Samuel Chase and other Whigs to oppose the powers of the Proprietary Governor. In the early 1770s, Paca joined other Maryland patriots in pushing for government regulation of fees paid to civil officers and in opposing the poll tax, which was used to pay the salaries of Anglican clergy, representing the established church. In 1773, he became a member of the Maryland committee of correspondence.114 The following year, along with Samuel Chase and Thomas Johnson, he served as legal counsel for fellow legislator Joseph H. Harrison, who had been jailed for refusing to pay the poll tax. All three men also attended the first provincial convention that same year and received appointments to the First Continental Congress. Around this time, Paca’s wife passed away.

Although he sat in Congress until 1779, Paca’s most noteworthy efforts were on the State level. In the spring and early summer of 1776, the provincial convention, a relatively conservative body, refused to authorize its congressional Delegates to vote for independence. Paca, aiding Chase and Carroll, drummed up enough support on the home front to persuade the convention to change its mind and bring Maryland into the affirmative column in the congressional voting on July 1–2, 1776. A few months later, he helped draft a State constitution. The next year, he began a 2-year term in the Maryland senate and saw militia duty. In addition, he sat on the council of safety and spent large amounts of his own money outfitting troops.

Although he served in Congress until 1779, Paca's most significant contributions were at the state level. In the spring and early summer of 1776, the provincial convention, which was a relatively conservative group, refused to let its congressional delegates vote for independence. Paca, along with Chase and Carroll, rallied enough support on the home front to convince the convention to change its stance and officially bring Maryland into the affirmative side of the congressional vote on July 1–2, 1776. A few months later, he helped draft a state constitution. The following year, he started a 2-year term in the Maryland Senate and participated in militia duty. Additionally, he served on the council of safety and spent a significant amount of his own money to equip the troops.

Between the years 1778 and 1782, Paca distinguished himself first as chief justice of the State Superior Court and then as chief judge of the circuit court of appeals in admiralty and prize cases. During that time, in 1780, a few months after the demise of his second wife, whom he had married 3 years earlier, he sold his home in Annapolis and moved permanently to Wye Plantation. In 1782 he raised funds for Washington College, founded that same year in Chestertown as the first institution of higher learning in Maryland, and served on its board of visitors. As Governor of Maryland (1782–85), he concerned himself with the welfare of war veterans and other postwar problems.

Between 1778 and 1782, Paca made a name for himself as the chief justice of the State Superior Court and then as the chief judge of the circuit court of appeals for admiralty and prize cases. During that time, in 1780, a few months after the death of his second wife, whom he had married 3 years prior, he sold his home in Annapolis and moved permanently to Wye Plantation. In 1782, he raised funds for Washington College, which was founded that same year in Chestertown as Maryland's first institution of higher learning, and he served on its board of visitors. As Governor of Maryland (1782–85), he focused on the well-being of war veterans and other postwar issues.

A delegate to the State convention to ratify the Federal Constitution in 1788, Paca urged its adoption if amended and helped draw up a list of proposed amendments. In 1789 President Washington appointed him as Federal district judge. He held this position until 1799, the year of his death at the age of 58, at Wye Hall, on Wye Island across the narrows from his own home, Wye Plantation. The former was the home of his son John, probably the only one of his five children from his two or possibly three marriages who reached maturity. At first interred at Wye Hall, Paca’s remains now rest in the family burial ground near Wye Plantation.

A delegate to the state convention to approve the Federal Constitution in 1788, Paca supported its adoption with amendments and helped create a list of proposed amendments. In 1789, President Washington appointed him as a federal district judge. He held this position until his death in 1799 at the age of 58, at Wye Hall on Wye Island, just across the narrows from his home, Wye Plantation. The former was the home of his son John, likely the only one of his five children from his two or possibly three marriages who lived to adulthood. Initially buried at Wye Hall, Paca’s remains are now in the family burial ground near Wye Plantation.


115

115

Robert Treat Paine

MASSACHUSETTS

MASSACHUSETTS

A clergyman turned lawyer-jurist, Robert Treat Paine spent only a short time in Congress but enjoyed considerable political prestige in Massachusetts. His second son (1773–1811) and great-grandson (1835–1910), both bearing exactly the same names as he, gained fame respectively as poet and businessman-philanthropist.

Robert Treat Paine was a clergyman who transitioned into a career as a lawyer. He served a short time in Congress but had a considerable political impact in Massachusetts. His second son (1773–1811) and great-grandson (1835–1910), both named after him, gained recognition as a poet and a businessman-philanthropist, respectively.

Among the ancestors of Paine, who was born at Boston in 1731, were many New England religious and political leaders. His father was a merchant who had once been a clergyman. Young Paine led his class at Boston Latin School and graduated from Harvard in 1749. He then taught school for a time before yielding to family tradition and entering the ministry.

Among the ancestors of Paine, who was born in Boston in 1731, were many New England religious and political leaders. His father was a merchant who had once been a clergyman. Young Paine topped his class at Boston Latin School and graduated from Harvard in 1749. He then taught school for a while before following family tradition and entering the ministry.

In 1755, during the French and Indian War, he served as chaplain on a military expedition to Crown Point, N.Y. To improve his health, he made a voyage to the Carolinas, England, Spain, and Greenland. About this time, he decided to forsake the ministry for the law, in which he had become interested during his theological studies. Admitted to the Massachusetts bar in 1757, he opened an office in Portland but in 1761 moved to Taunton.

In 1755, during the French and Indian War, he served as a chaplain on a military mission to Crown Point, NY. To boost his health, he took a trip to the Carolinas, England, Spain, and Greenland. Around this time, he decided to leave the ministry for a career in law, which he had become interested in during his theology studies. He was admitted to the Massachusetts bar in 1757 and opened an office in Portland, but in 1761 he moved to Taunton.

Paine, a friend of John Adams and John Hancock, early became involved in the patriot movement. As a result, he was chosen in 1770 as one of the prosecuting attorneys in the Boston Massacre trial and thus gained recognition throughout the Colonies. That same year, he married, siring eight children. Between 1773 and 1778, except in 1776, he served in the Massachusetts legislature, in 1777 being speaker of the lower house. He was one of the first five Delegates sent by Massachusetts to the Continental Congress (1774–76), where he specialized in military and Indian affairs. He gained the116 nickname “Objection Maker” because he argued against so many proposals.

Paine, a friend of John Adams and John Hancock, got involved in the patriot movement early on. Because of this, he was chosen in 1770 as one of the prosecuting attorneys in the Boston Massacre trial, which helped him gain recognition throughout the Colonies. That same year, he got married and had eight children. From 1773 to 1778, except in 1776, he served in the Massachusetts legislature, becoming speaker of the lower house in 1777. He was one of the first five Delegates sent by Massachusetts to the Continental Congress (1774–76), where he focused on military and Indian affairs. He earned the nickname “Objection Maker” because he opposed so many proposals.

Although reelected to Congress in 1777, Paine chose to stay in Massachusetts. In addition to his legislative speakership, he was elected as the first attorney general, a position he held until 1790. Between 1778 and 1780 he played a prominent role in drafting the Massachusetts constitution. From 1790 until 1804, appointed by his old friend Hancock, he sat as an associate justice of the Superior Court.

Although he was reelected to Congress in 1777, Paine decided to remain in Massachusetts. Along with being the speaker of the legislature, he was elected as the first attorney general, a role he held until 1790. From 1778 to 1780, he played a key part in drafting the Massachusetts constitution. From 1790 to 1804, he served as an associate justice of the Superior Court, appointed by his old friend Hancock.

Meantime, in 1780, Paine had moved from Taunton to Boston and become active in civic affairs. Indicative of his lifelong interest in science, that same year he was one of the founders of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. In religion, he broke away from Calvinism and embraced Unitarianism. Politically, he alined himself with the Federalists. In 1804 increasing deafness brought about his retirement from the Superior Court, and he died a decade later at the age of 83 in Boston. He was buried in the Old Granary Burying Ground.

Meantime, in 1780, Paine moved from Taunton to Boston and became active in local affairs. Reflecting his lifelong interest in science, he was one of the founders of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences that same year. In terms of religion, he broke away from Calvinism and adopted Unitarianism. Politically, he aligned himself with the Federalists. In 1804, worsening deafness led to his retirement from the Superior Court, and he passed away a decade later at the age of 83 in Boston. He was buried in the Old Granary Burying Ground.

117

117


John Penn

NORTH CAROLINA

N.C.

Like fellow signers Joseph Hewes and William Hooper, John Penn adopted North Carolina as his home. Except for a 5-year stint in the Continental Congress and a brief career in State service, he passed the years peacefully as a country lawyer far from the clamor of the public forum.

Like other signers Joseph Hewes and William Hooper, John Penn made North Carolina his home. Apart from a 5-year stint in the Continental Congress and a brief period in State service, he lived his life quietly as a country lawyer, away from the hustle of public life.

Penn was born in 1740 or 1741 in Caroline County, Va. His father was a well-to-do farmer, and his mother the daughter of a prominent county judge. Despite the family’s social position, Penn received only a few years of formal schooling. At the age of 18, when his father died, he inherited a sizable estate. But he was dissatisfied with the prospects it offered, and decided to continue his education. Encouraged by a relative, Edmund Pendleton, a well-known lawyer who made available his personal library, Penn studied law on his own and within 3 years gained admittance to the bar. Soon thereafter he married; he and his wife reared three children.

Penn was born in 1740 or 1741 in Caroline County, Virginia. His father was a wealthy farmer, and his mother was the daughter of a prominent county judge. Despite the family's social status, Penn only received a few years of formal education. When he was 18 and his father passed away, he inherited a large estate. However, he was unhappy with the opportunities it provided and chose to further his education. Motivated by a relative, Edmund Pendleton, a well-known lawyer who offered access to his personal library, Penn studied law independently and within three years was admitted to the bar. Shortly after that, he got married, and he and his wife raised three children.

In 1774, at the end of more than a decade of successful law practice in Virginia, Penn journeyed to Granville County, N.C., and made his home near Stovall. The next year, he was elected to the provincial assembly and only a few weeks later to the Continental Congress (1775–80). In 1777, upon the retirement of Hewes and Hooper, he inherited the leadership of his State’s delegation. He was one of the 16 signers of the Declaration who also signed the Articles of Confederation.

In 1774, after over a decade of thriving in his law practice in Virginia, Penn moved to Granville County, N.C., and settled near Stovall. The following year, he was elected to the provincial assembly and just a few weeks later to the Continental Congress (1775–80). In 1777, after Hewes and Hooper retired, he took over as the leader of his state's delegation. He was one of the 16 signers of the Declaration who also signed the Articles of Confederation.

Unobtrusive and unassuming but remarkably efficient, likeable, and discreet, Penn quickly won the respect of his congressional colleagues. He rarely disputed with others, but when he did his good humor and peaceful manner saved the day. On one occasion, he feuded with President of Congress Henry Laurens of South Carolina over a personal matter. He accepted Laurens’ challenge to a duel, but en route to the proposed site convinced Laurens that they should bury their differences and drop the matter.

Unobtrusive and unassuming but incredibly efficient, friendly, and discreet, Penn quickly earned the respect of his colleagues in Congress. He rarely argued with others, but when he did, his good humor and calm demeanor resolved the situation. One time, he had a conflict with the President of Congress, Henry Laurens from South Carolina, over a personal issue. He accepted Laurens' challenge to a duel, but on the way to the designated spot, he persuaded Laurens that they should put their differences aside and let it go.

Late in 1780 the Governor of North Carolina recalled Penn from Congress to sit on the emergency Board of War, created by the legislature in September to share with the Governor responsibility for military affairs. The three-man board, of which Penn became the leading member, in effect soon assumed control of all military matters. The Governor and military officials, resenting the infringement upon their prerogatives and their loss of authority, persuaded the legislature to abolish the board in January 1781.

Late in 1780, the Governor of North Carolina brought Penn back from Congress to join the emergency Board of War, which the legislature had created in September to help manage military affairs alongside the Governor. The three-member board, with Penn as its leading member, quickly took charge of all military matters. The Governor and military officials, upset about losing power and control, convinced the legislature to get rid of the board in January 1781.

His health declining, the following July Penn declined an appointment to the Governor’s Council. With the exception of a short tour in 1784 as State tax receiver for the Confederation, he apparently devoted his last years to his law practice. In 1788, only in his late forties, he died at his home near Stovall. Originally buried in the118 family graveyard adjacent to his home, his remains now rest in Guilford Courthouse National Military Park near Greensboro.

His health deteriorating, the following July, Penn turned down an appointment to the Governor’s Council. Except for a brief stint in 1784 as the state tax collector for the Confederation, he seemed to spend his final years focused on his law practice. In 1788, at just in his late forties, he passed away at his home near Stovall. Initially buried in the118 family graveyard next to his home, his remains are now interred at Guilford Courthouse National Military Park near Greensboro.


George Read

DELAWARE

DELAWARE

Conservative lawyer George Read was the only signer who voted against independence in the final congressional vote on July 2, 1776. In addition to attaining many prominent State offices, he attended the Constitutional Convention, where he defended the rights of the smaller States, and subsequently served as a Senator in the First Congress.

George Read, a conservative lawyer, was the only signer who voted against independence in the final congressional vote on July 2, 1776. In addition to holding various important state positions, he attended the Constitutional Convention, where he advocated for the rights of smaller states, and later served as a Senator in the First Congress.

Read’s mother was the daughter of a Welsh planter, and his Dublin-born father a landholder of means. Soon after George’s birth in 1733 near North East in Cecil County, Md., his family moved to New Castle, Del., where the youth grew up. He attended school at Chester, Pa., and Rev. Francis Alison’s academy at New London, Pa., and about the age of 15 began reading law with a Philadelphia lawyer. In 1753 he was admitted to the bar and began to practice. The next year, he journeyed back to New Castle, hung out his shingle, and before long enlisted a clientele that extended into Maryland. In 1763 he wed the widowed sister of future fellow signer George Ross, and she bore him four sons and a daughter.

Read’s mother was the daughter of a Welsh planter, and his father, who was born in Dublin, was a well-off landowner. Shortly after George was born in 1733 near North East in Cecil County, Maryland, his family moved to New Castle, Delaware, where he grew up. He attended school in Chester, Pennsylvania, and Rev. Francis Alison’s academy in New London, Pennsylvania. At around 15 years old, he started studying law with a lawyer in Philadelphia. In 1753, he passed the bar exam and began practicing law. The following year, he returned to New Castle, set up his practice, and soon built a clientele that reached into Maryland. In 1763, he married the widowed sister of future fellow signer George Ross, and they had four sons and a daughter together.

While crown attorney general (1763–74) for the Three Lower119 Counties (present Delaware), Read protested against the Stamp Act. In 1765 he began a career in the colonial legislature that extended for more than a decade. A moderate Whig, he supported nonimportation measures and dignified protests. His attendance in Congress (1774–77) was irregular. Like his friend John Dickinson, he was willing to protect colonial rights but was wary of extremism. He balloted against independence on July 2, 1776, apparently either bowing to the strong Tory sentiment in Delaware or believing reconciliation with Britain was still possible.

While serving as the crown attorney general (1763–74) for the Three Lower119 Counties (now Delaware), Read protested against the Stamp Act. In 1765, he started a career in the colonial legislature that lasted over a decade. As a moderate Whig, he supported nonimportation measures and dignified protests. His participation in Congress (1774–77) was inconsistent. Like his friend John Dickinson, he was willing to defend colonial rights but was cautious about extremism. He voted against independence on July 2, 1776, likely either succumbing to the strong Tory sentiment in Delaware or believing that reconciliation with Britain was still possible.

That same year, Read gave priority to State responsibilities. He presided over the Delaware constitutional convention, in which he chaired the drafting committee, and began a term as speaker of the legislative council, which in effect made him vice president of the State. When the British captured Wilmington the next fall, they captured the president, a resident of the city. At first, because Read was away in Congress, Thomas McKean, speaker of the lower house, took over as acting president. But in November, after almost being captured himself while he and his family were en route to Dover from Philadelphia, newly captured by the British, Read assumed the office and held it until the spring of 1778.

That same year, Read focused on state responsibilities. He led the Delaware constitutional convention, where he chaired the drafting committee, and began a term as speaker of the legislative council, effectively making him the vice president of the state. When the British took Wilmington the following fall, they captured the president, a resident of the city. At first, since Read was away in Congress, Thomas McKean, the speaker of the lower house, stepped in as acting president. However, in November, after nearly being captured himself while he and his family were traveling to Dover from Philadelphia, which had just been taken by the British, Read took office and held it until the spring of 1778.

During 1779, in poor health, Read resigned from the legislative council, refused reelection to Congress, and began a period of inactivity. In the years 1782–88, he again sat on the council, and concurrently held the position of judge of the court of appeals in admiralty cases. Meantime, in 1784, he had served on a commission that adjusted New York-Massachusetts land claims. In 1786 he attended the Annapolis Convention. The next year, he participated in the Constitutional Convention. He later led the ratification movement in Delaware, the first State to ratify.

During 1779, in poor health, Read stepped down from the legislative council, declined reelection to Congress, and entered a period of inactivity. From 1782 to 1788, he once again served on the council while also holding the position of judge for the court of appeals in admiralty cases. Meanwhile, in 1784, he was part of a commission that resolved the land claims between New York and Massachusetts. In 1786, he attended the Annapolis Convention. The following year, he took part in the Constitutional Convention. He later led the ratification effort in Delaware, which was the first state to ratify.

In the U.S. Senate (1789–93), Read’s attendance was again spasmodic, but when present he allied with the Federalists. He resigned to accept the post of chief justice of Delaware. He held this office until his death at New Castle 5 years later, just 3 days after he celebrated his 65th birthday. His grave is located there in the Immanuel Episcopal Churchyard.

In the U.S. Senate (1789–93), Read's attendance was again inconsistent, but when he was there, he sided with the Federalists. He resigned to take on the role of chief justice of Delaware. He held this position until he passed away in New Castle five years later, just three days after celebrating his 65th birthday. His grave is located in the Immanuel Episcopal Churchyard.


120

120

Caesar Rodney

DELAWARE

DELAWARE

Self-educated Caesar Rodney climbed to high State and National offices, but his military-political duties in Delaware spared him little time for the affairs of Congress. He is noted mainly for his emergency ride to Philadelphia that broke his State’s deadlock in the vote for independence, but he was also one of two bachelor signers and the only native of the three from Delaware.

Self-taught, Caesar Rodney achieved significant State and National roles, but his military and political duties in Delaware left him with little time for Congressional affairs. He is best known for his urgent ride to Philadelphia, which broke his state's deadlock on the vote for independence, but he was also one of only two single signers and the only native Delawarean among the three.

Rodney was born in 1728 on his father’s 800-acre plantation, Byfield, near Dover in Kent County. In 1745, as the eldest child, he inherited the plantation. Despite a lack of formal and legal education, a decade later he accepted the first of a series of county offices: high sheriff, register of wills, recorder of deeds, clerk of the orphans’ court, justice of the peace, militia captain, and cotrustee of the loan office.

Rodney was born in 1728 on his father's 800-acre plantation, Byfield, near Dover in Kent County. In 1745, as the oldest child, he inherited the plantation. Even without formal legal education, ten years later he took on the first of several county positions: high sheriff, register of wills, recorder of deeds, clerk of the orphans’ court, justice of the peace, militia captain, and co-trustee of the loan office.

On the provincial level, for most of the period 1758–76 Rodney functioned as a justice of the Superior Court for the Three Lower Counties (present Delaware) and as a legislator in the lower house, including many tours as speaker. Between 1765 and 1774, he owned and occupied a townhouse that he used while in Dover. He and Thomas McKean compiled the colony’s laws, and they both attended the Stamp Act Congress (1765). Three years later, the two of them and George Read, all three later to sign the Declaration, drafted a protest to the King concerning the Townshend Acts. In 1774, after Parliament closed Boston Harbor, Rodney usurped the prerogative121 of the Proprietary Governor by calling a special meeting of the legislature at New Castle, the first Revolutionary convention in the State. Rodney, McKean, and Read were sent to the First Continental Congress.

On the provincial level, for most of the period from 1758 to 1776, Rodney served as a justice of the Superior Court for the Three Lower Counties (now Delaware) and as a legislator in the lower house, including several terms as speaker. Between 1765 and 1774, he owned and lived in a townhouse that he used while in Dover. He and Thomas McKean put together the colony’s laws, and they both attended the Stamp Act Congress in 1765. Three years later, the two of them, along with George Read—who all later signed the Declaration—drafted a protest to the King regarding the Townshend Acts. In 1774, after Parliament closed Boston Harbor, Rodney took the initiative, bypassing the Proprietary Governor, by calling a special meeting of the legislature in New Castle, marking the first Revolutionary convention in the state. Rodney, McKean, and Read were sent to the First Continental Congress.

Although a congressional Member for 2 years, Rodney was often absent in Delaware, sometimes presiding over the legislature and sometimes meeting military responsibilities. In May 1775 he was elected a colonel in the militia, and in September moved up to brigadier general. Late the next June, while the independence resolution was pending in Congress, he was investigating Loyalist agitations in Sussex County. On the evening of July 1, after his return to Byfield, he received McKean’s dispatch pointing out that Read had voted against independence that day and pleading with Rodney to hurry to Philadelphia to break the tie. Riding all night through a thunderstorm and stopping only to change horses, he completed the 80-mile trip just in time to make possible an affirmative vote for Delaware.

Although he had been a congressional member for 2 years, Rodney was often away in Delaware, sometimes leading the legislature and other times fulfilling military duties. In May 1775, he was elected as a colonel in the militia, and by September, he was promoted to brigadier general. Late the following June, while the independence resolution was still being debated in Congress, he was looking into Loyalist activities in Sussex County. On the evening of July 1, after returning to Byfield, he received McKean’s message informing him that Read had voted against independence that day and urging Rodney to rush to Philadelphia to break the tie. He rode all night through a thunderstorm, stopping only to switch horses, and completed the 80-mile journey just in time to secure a positive vote for Delaware.

This brought down the wrath of the Kent County conservatives on Rodney, who was not reelected to Congress nor to the legislature and not appointed to the State constitutional convention. Out of office, that fall and the next year he turned to military affairs, recruiting troops and taking part in minor actions in Delaware and New Jersey. In September 1777 acting State president McKean commissioned him as a major general.

This earned Rodney the anger of the Kent County conservatives, leading to him not being reelected to Congress or the legislature, and he was also not appointed to the State constitutional convention. Out of office, that fall and the following year, he focused on military matters, recruiting troops and participating in minor engagements in Delaware and New Jersey. In September 1777, acting State president McKean appointed him as a major general.

That spring, the legislature had designated Rodney as an admiralty judge. In December it reelected him to the Continental Congress. The next year, it nominated him as State president (1778–81), in which capacity he stimulated the Delaware war effort. When he left office, he belatedly sought medical treatment in Philadelphia for a cancerous growth on his face, which had been bothering him for a decade and which he had covered with a green silk veil. In 1783, though a dying man, he entered the State senate and accepted the speakership, but passed away the next year at the age of 55. Interred originally at Byfield Plantation, his remains are now buried in the yard of Christ Episcopal Church in Dover.

That spring, the legislature appointed Rodney as an admiralty judge. In December, they re-elected him to the Continental Congress. The following year, they nominated him as State president (1778–81), where he boosted Delaware's war effort. After leaving office, he finally sought medical treatment in Philadelphia for a cancerous growth on his face, which had been troubling him for a decade and which he had covered with a green silk veil. In 1783, despite being gravely ill, he joined the State senate and took on the role of speaker, but he passed away the next year at the age of 55. Originally buried at Byfield Plantation, his remains are now laid to rest in the yard of Christ Episcopal Church in Dover.


122

122

George Ross

PENNSYLVANIA

PENNSYLVANIA

A few of the signers, such as George Ross, were latecomers to the Revolutionary cause. Like many others, he exerted more influence in State than national affairs.

Some of the signers, such as George Ross, joined the Revolutionary cause later than others. Like many individuals, he had a bigger influence on state matters than on national issues.

The oldest son of an Anglican clergyman who had immigrated from Scotland, Ross was born in 1730 at New Castle, Del. After a preliminary classical education, he read law with his stepbrother John at Philadelphia and in 1750 entered the bar. Settling the next year at Lancaster, Pa., where he married and fathered two sons and a daughter, he built up a successful law practice and served as crown prosecutor for Cumberland County (1751–63). A member of the colonial legislature from 1768 until 1775, he sometimes joined in its disputes with the Proprietary Governor and demonstrated an interest in Indian affairs.

The oldest son of an Anglican cleric who had moved from Scotland, Ross was born in 1730 in New Castle, Delaware. After receiving a basic classical education, he studied law with his stepbrother John in Philadelphia and was admitted to the bar in 1750. He settled in Lancaster, Pennsylvania the following year, where he married and had two sons and a daughter. He built a successful law practice and served as the crown prosecutor for Cumberland County from 1751 to 1763. A member of the colonial legislature from 1768 until 1775, he occasionally got involved in its conflicts with the Proprietary Governor and showed an interest in Native American affairs.

Meantime, in 1774, despite his Loyalist leanings, a provincial convention to which Ross had been elected sent him to the Continental Congress. The next year, by which time he had for some reason decided to affiliate with the Revolutionaries, he also served on the Pennsylvania council of safety and held a militia colonelcy. In 1776 he assisted in negotiating a peace treaty with the Indians in northwestern Pennsylvania, and acted as vice president of the State constitutional123 convention, for which he helped draft a declaration of rights. Not a Member of Congress during the voting for independence on July 1–2, 1776, he received his appointment soon enough to sign the Declaration on August 2. He won a reputation among his colleagues for his eloquence, wit, and conviviality, but made no noteworthy contributions to congressional proceedings. Illness brought about his resignation in January 1777.

In 1774, even though he leaned towards Loyalism, a provincial convention that Ross was elected to sent him to the Continental Congress. The following year, for some reason, he chose to align with the Revolutionaries and also served on the Pennsylvania council of safety while holding the rank of militia colonel. In 1776, he helped negotiate a peace treaty with the Indians in northwestern Pennsylvania and served as vice president of the state constitutional convention, where he assisted in drafting a declaration of rights. He wasn’t a Member of Congress during the vote for independence on July 1–2, 1776, but he got appointed soon enough to sign the Declaration on August 2. He gained a reputation among his peers for his eloquence, wit, and friendliness, but he didn’t make any significant contributions to congressional proceedings. Illness led to his resignation in January 1777.

In 1778, while Ross was acting as admiralty judge in Pennsylvania, a congressional court of appeals overruled his decision in a case involving a dispute between a citizen of Connecticut and the State of Pennsylvania. Ross, refusing to acknowledge the authority of the higher court to counter State decisions, initiated a dispute between Pennsylvania and the Central Government that represented an early manifestation of the States rights controversy and did not subside until 1809. But Ross did not live to see the outcome, for he died in Philadelphia in 1779 at the age of 49. He was buried in Christ Church Burial Ground.

In 1778, while Ross was serving as the admiralty judge in Pennsylvania, a congressional court of appeals overturned his ruling in a case involving a conflict between a citizen of Connecticut and the State of Pennsylvania. Ross, refusing to recognize the authority of the higher court to challenge state decisions, sparked a dispute between Pennsylvania and the Central Government that represented an early sign of the States' rights controversy, which did not die down until 1809. However, Ross did not live to see the outcome, as he passed away in Philadelphia in 1779 at the age of 49. He was buried in Christ Church Burial Ground.

124

124


Benjamin Rush

PENNSYLVANIA

PENNSYLVANIA

Doctor, medical educator, chemist, humanitarian, politician, author, reformer-moralist, soldier, temperance advocate, abolitionist—Benjamin Rush was all of these. One of the younger signers, only 30 years of age at the time, he was already a physician of note.

Doctor, medical educator, chemist, humanitarian, politician, author, reformer, soldier, advocate for temperance, abolitionist—Benjamin Rush was all of these. One of the younger signers, he was only 30 years old at the time and was already a prominent physician.

Rush, the fourth of seven children, was born in 1745 at Byberry (“The Homestead”), near Philadelphia. At the age of 5, his farmer-gunsmith father died. The youth obtained a sound education at West Nottingham Academy, in Rising Sun, Md., operated by an uncle, and graduated from the College of New Jersey (later Princeton University). Returning to Philadelphia in 1760, he apparently first considered studying law but chose medicine. In 1766, at the end of a 5-year apprenticeship to a local physician, he sailed to Scotland, where 2 years later the University of Edinburgh awarded him a medical degree.

Rush, the fourth of seven children, was born in 1745 at Byberry (“The Homestead”), near Philadelphia. When he was 5, his father, who was a farmer and gunsmith, passed away. He received a solid education at West Nottingham Academy in Rising Sun, Md., which was run by his uncle, and graduated from the College of New Jersey (now Princeton University). After returning to Philadelphia in 1760, he initially thought about studying law but decided to pursue medicine instead. In 1766, after completing a 5-year apprenticeship with a local doctor, he sailed to Scotland, where two years later, the University of Edinburgh awarded him a medical degree.

While there, assisted by a fellow college alumnus and one-day fellow signer, Richard Stockton, Rush helped overcome the objections of John Witherspoon’s wife and persuaded Witherspoon to accept the presidency of the College of New Jersey. In 1769, after further training in London, where Rush made the acquaintance of Benjamin Franklin, and a short visit to Paris, he came back to Philadelphia and set up practice. Before the year was out, he obtained the first professorship of chemistry in the country at the College of Philadelphia, and wrote the first American textbook on the subject.

While he was there, with the help of a fellow college graduate and future signer, Richard Stockton, Rush managed to address the concerns of John Witherspoon’s wife and convinced Witherspoon to take on the presidency of the College of New Jersey. In 1769, after further training in London, where Rush met Benjamin Franklin, and a brief trip to Paris, he returned to Philadelphia and started his practice. By the end of the year, he secured the first chemistry professorship in the country at the College of Philadelphia and wrote the first American textbook on the subject.

While prospering as a physician, Rush cultivated the friendship of such men as Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Thomas Paine. In fact, Rush suggested to the latter that he write his famous tract Common Sense (1776), supplied the title, and aided in its publication. He also contributed political articles to the press. That same year, he married Stockton’s eldest daughter, Julia.

While thriving as a doctor, Rush developed friendships with notable figures like Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Thomas Paine. In fact, Rush encouraged Paine to write his famous pamphlet Common Sense (1776), came up with the title, and helped get it published. He also wrote political articles for the press. That same year, he married Stockton's oldest daughter, Julia.

Rush’s tour in the Continental Congress was brief. In June 1776 he attended a Pennsylvania conference of patriots and helped draft a declaration of the colony’s support for national independence. In recognition of these services, the following month the provincial convention sent him to Congress—after the adoption of the Declaration. In December, Philadelphia threatened by British invasion, the Government fled to Baltimore. Rush apparently, however, did not spend much time there. That same month, he relocated his wife at the home of a relative in Cecil County, Md., and took part in General Washington’s New Jersey campaign as a surgeon in the Philadelphia militia.

Rush’s time in the Continental Congress was short. In June 1776, he attended a Pennsylvania gathering of patriots and helped write a declaration supporting national independence. In recognition of his contributions, the provincial convention sent him to Congress the following month—after the Declaration was adopted. In December, with Philadelphia under threat of British invasion, the government fled to Baltimore. However, Rush didn't seem to spend much time there. That same month, he moved his wife to stay with a relative in Cecil County, Maryland, and participated in General Washington’s campaign in New Jersey as a surgeon in the Philadelphia militia.

In April 1777, not reelected to Congress because of his opposition to the Pennsylvania constitution of the previous year, Rush accepted125 the position of surgeon general in the Middle Department of the Continental Army. Abhorring the deplorable conditions prevailing in the medical service, in a complaint to Washington he accused his superior, Dr. William Shippen, of maladministration. Washington referred the matter to Congress, which vindicated Shippen. In January 1778 Rush angrily resigned. His subsequent criticisms of Washington and his participation in the Conway Cabal, a movement to replace General Washington, ended his military and, for a time, his political career. He resumed his medical practice in Philadelphia.

In April 1777, not re-elected to Congress due to his opposition to the Pennsylvania constitution from the previous year, Rush accepted the position of surgeon general in the Middle Department of the Continental Army. Disgusted by the poor conditions in the medical service, he complained to Washington, accusing his superior, Dr. William Shippen, of mismanagement. Washington referred the issue to Congress, which cleared Shippen of any wrongdoing. In January 1778, Rush resigned in anger. His later criticisms of Washington and his involvement in the Conway Cabal, a movement aimed at replacing General Washington, ended his military career and, for a time, his political career. He returned to practicing medicine in Philadelphia.

Benjamin Rush long served on the staff of Philadelphia’s Pennsylvania Hospital, shown here in 1799. Founded in 1751 and still in use today, it is the oldest hospital in the United States.

In 1787 Rush wrote tracts in the newspapers endorsing the U.S. Constitution. In the Commonwealth ratifying convention that same year, he aided James Wilson in the struggle for its adoption. In 1789–90 Rush attended the Pennsylvania constitutional convention. From 1797 until 1813 he served as Treasurer of the U.S. Mint.

In 1787, Rush wrote articles in newspapers supporting the U.S. Constitution. During the Commonwealth ratifying convention that same year, he assisted James Wilson in the effort to get it approved. Between 1789 and 1790, Rush participated in the Pennsylvania constitutional convention. From 1797 to 1813, he held the position of Treasurer of the U.S. Mint.

126 Meantime Rush, through his writings and lectures, had become probably the best known physician and medical teacher in the land, and he fostered Philadelphia’s ascendancy as the early medical center of the Nation. His students, who idolized him, came from as far away as Europe to attend his classes at the College of Philadelphia, and its successors the University of the State of Pennsylvania and the University of Pennsylvania (1791). He also served on the staff of the Pennsylvania Hospital from 1783 until the end of his life, helped found the Philadelphia College of Physicians (1787), and held office as first president of the Philadelphia Medical Society. In 1786 he founded the Philadelphia Dispensary, the first free medical clinic in the country. His work among the insane at the Pennsylvania Hospital resulted in Medical Inquiries and Observations Upon the Diseases of the Mind (1812), which to some degree foreshadowed modern psychiatric techniques.

126 In the meantime, Rush, through his writings and lectures, had become probably the most well-known physician and medical teacher in the country, and he helped establish Philadelphia as the early medical center of the nation. His students, who admired him greatly, traveled from as far away as Europe to attend his classes at the College of Philadelphia, and its successors, the University of the State of Pennsylvania and the University of Pennsylvania (1791). He also served on the staff of the Pennsylvania Hospital from 1783 until the end of his life, helped found the Philadelphia College of Physicians (1787), and was the first president of the Philadelphia Medical Society. In 1786, he established the Philadelphia Dispensary, the first free medical clinic in the country. His work with the mentally ill at the Pennsylvania Hospital led to Medical Inquiries and Observations Upon the Diseases of the Mind (1812), which, to some extent, anticipated modern psychiatric techniques.

Rush won much less favor from his professional peers than he did from his students. His critics particularly attacked his theory of bleeding and purging for the treatment of disease. Although he was one of the few doctors who remained in Philadelphia during the devastating yellow fever epidemics of 1793 and 1798, his opponents criticized his methods of treatment.

Rush earned much less respect from his professional colleagues than he did from his students. His critics especially targeted his theory of bleeding and purging as a way to treat illness. Even though he was one of the few doctors who stayed in Philadelphia during the deadly yellow fever outbreaks of 1793 and 1798, his opponents condemned his treatment methods.

Aroused by the idealism of the Revolution as well as the plight of the poor and sick he encountered in his medical practice, Rush helped pioneer various humanitarian and social movements that were to restructure U.S. life in the 19th century. These included abolition of slavery and educational and prison reform. Rush also condemned public and capital punishment and advocated temperance. Many of his reform articles appeared in Essays: Literary, Moral, and Philosophical (1798).

Aroused by the idealism of the Revolution as well as the struggles of the poor and sick he saw in his medical practice, Rush helped lead various humanitarian and social movements that would reshape U.S. life in the 19th century. These included the abolition of slavery and reforms in education and prisons. Rush also spoke out against public and capital punishment and championed temperance. Many of his reform articles appeared in Essays: Literary, Moral, and Philosophical (1798).

Finally, Rush helped organize and sat as a trustee of Dickinson College (1783); aided in founding the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery (1787) and later served as its president; enjoyed membership in the American Philosophical Society; and was a cofounder and vice president of the Philadelphia Bible Society, which advocated the use of scripture in the public schools.

Finally, Rush helped organize and served as a trustee of Dickinson College (1783); assisted in founding the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery (1787) and later served as its president; was a member of the American Philosophical Society; and was a cofounder and vice president of the Philadelphia Bible Society, which promoted the use of scripture in public schools.

A typhus epidemic claimed Rush’s life at the age of 67 in 1813. Surviving him were six sons and three daughters of the 13 children he had fathered. His grave is in Christ Church Burial Ground at Philadelphia.

A typhus epidemic took Rush’s life at the age of 67 in 1813. He is survived by six sons and three daughters out of the 13 children he had fathered. His grave is in Christ Church Burial Ground in Philadelphia.


127

127

Edward Rutledge

SOUTH CAROLINA

S.C.

Edward Rutledge, at the age of 26, was the youngest of the signers. Despite his youth, he had already made a name for himself in South Carolina as a lawyer-politician and had assumed leadership of his congressional delegation. A moderate, he at first fought against the independence resolution but finally submitted to the majority and voted for it. His later State career, which included combat action in the militia, culminated in the governorship.

At just 26, Edward Rutledge was the youngest signer of the Declaration. Despite his youth, he had made a name for himself in South Carolina as both a lawyer and a politician, leading his congressional delegation. He was a moderate who initially opposed the independence resolution but ultimately joined the majority and voted in favor of it. His later career in the state included serving in the militia, culminating in his role as governor.

The fifth son and youngest child of an Irish immigrant and physician, Rutledge was born in 1749 at or near Charleston, S.C. Like Middleton, Lynch, and Heyward, the other South Carolina signers, as a young man he studied law in England. In 1773, during his first year of practice on his return to Charleston, he won Whig acclaim by obtaining the release of newspaper publisher Thomas Powell, who had been imprisoned by the Crown for printing an article critical of the Loyalist upper house of the colonial legislature. The next year, the grateful Whigs named Rutledge as one of five Delegates to the First Continental Congress; and he married Henrietta Middleton, his colleague’s sister. The Rutledges were to have three children.

The fifth son and youngest child of an Irish immigrant and doctor, Rutledge was born in 1749 in or near Charleston, S.C. Like Middleton, Lynch, and Heyward, the other South Carolina signers, he studied law in England as a young man. In 1773, during his first year of practicing law after returning to Charleston, he gained recognition from the Whigs by securing the release of newspaper publisher Thomas Powell, who had been imprisoned by the Crown for publishing an article that criticized the Loyalist upper house of the colonial legislature. The following year, grateful Whigs chose Rutledge as one of five Delegates to the First Continental Congress; he also married Henrietta Middleton, the sister of his colleague. The Rutledges were to have three children.

Rutledge spent his first congressional term in the shadow of the more experienced South Carolina Delegates, among them his older brother, John, and his father-in-law, Henry Middleton. During 1775–76, however, both in Congress and in two South Carolina provincial assemblies, his increasing self-confidence and maturation of128 judgment brought him the esteem of his associates. In the latter year, two of the senior South Carolina Delegates, Christopher Gadsden and Henry Middleton, retired from Congress and Thomas Lynch, Sr., suffered an incapacitating stroke. Rutledge, his brother absent on State business, found himself the delegation leader.

Rutledge spent his first term in Congress overshadowed by the more experienced South Carolina delegates, including his older brother, John, and his father-in-law, Henry Middleton. However, during 1775–76, both in Congress and in two South Carolina provincial assemblies, his growing self-confidence and improved judgment earned him the respect of his peers. In that same year, two senior South Carolina delegates, Christopher Gadsden and Henry Middleton, stepped down from Congress, and Thomas Lynch, Sr., suffered a debilitating stroke. With his brother away on state business, Rutledge became the leader of the delegation.

On June 7, 1776, when Richard Henry Lee of Virginia proposed national independence, Rutledge led the moderates in securing a delay in the voting. He knew that independence was inevitable. In March his colony, preceded only by New Hampshire, had adopted a constitution. Moreover, that same month the provincial assembly had empowered its Delegates to vote for independence if they so desired. Yet Rutledge firmly believed that the Colonies should first confederate and nurture foreign alliances to strengthen themselves for the perilous step they were about to take. When the vote on independence came up on July 1, he refused to yield and South Carolina balloted negatively. But nine of the Colonies voted affirmatively. Rutledge, realizing that the resolution would probably carry anyway, proposed that the vote be recast the following day. He persuaded the other South Carolina Delegates to submit to the will of the majority for the sake of unanimity, and South Carolina reversed its position.

On June 7, 1776, when Richard Henry Lee from Virginia suggested national independence, Rutledge led the moderates in getting the voting postponed. He understood that independence was unavoidable. In March, his colony, following only New Hampshire, had adopted a constitution. Additionally, that same month, the provincial assembly had given its Delegates the authority to vote for independence if they chose to. However, Rutledge strongly believed that the Colonies should first come together and build foreign alliances to better prepare themselves for the risky move they were about to make. When the vote on independence was held on July 1, he refused to back down and South Carolina voted against it. But nine of the Colonies voted in favor. Realizing that the resolution would likely pass anyway, Rutledge suggested that the vote be taken again the next day. He convinced the other South Carolina Delegates to go along with the majority for the sake of unity, and South Carolina changed its vote.

Rutledge’s last important assignment occurred in September, when he accompanied John Adams and Benjamin Franklin on a vain peace mission to Staten Island to negotiate with British Admiral Lord Richard Howe, who in union with his brother, Gen. William Howe, was belatedly and idealistically trying to resolve the differences between the Colonies and the mother country. Two months later, Rutledge departed from Congress in order to resume his law practice in Charleston.

Rutledge’s last significant assignment happened in September when he went with John Adams and Benjamin Franklin on a fruitless peace mission to Staten Island to negotiate with British Admiral Lord Richard Howe. He was, along with his brother, Gen. William Howe, trying to amicably settle the issues between the Colonies and Great Britain, though it was a late and somewhat unrealistic effort. Two months later, Rutledge left Congress to go back to his law practice in Charleston.

In 1778 Rutledge accepted a seat in the State legislature and the next year won reelection to Congress, though military duties prevented his attendance. As a militia captain, in February 1779 he took part in Gen. William Moultrie’s defeat of the British at Port Royal Island, S.C. But in May, 1780, during the siege of Charleston, the redcoats captured Rutledge, as well as Heyward and Middleton, and imprisoned them at St. Augustine, Fla., until July 1781.

In 1778, Rutledge took a seat in the state legislature and the following year was re-elected to Congress, although military obligations kept him from attending. As a militia captain, he participated in General William Moultrie’s victory over the British at Port Royal Island, S.C., in February 1779. However, in May 1780, during the siege of Charleston, the redcoats captured Rutledge, along with Heyward and Middleton, and imprisoned them in St. Augustine, Fla., until July 1781.

From 1782 until 1798 Rutledge sat in the State legislature, which on three occasions designated him as a presidential elector. During this period, his mistrust of unbridled republicanism reinforced his conservatism and brought him into the Federalist Party. In private129 life he flourished, his wealth increasing through his law practice and investments in plantations. In 1792 his first wife died and he remarried. To crown his achievements, 6 years later the people of South Carolina chose him as Governor. But, his health poor, he died at Charleston early in 1800 at the age of 50, nearly a year before the end of his term. The yard of St. Philip’s Episcopal Church is the site of his grave.

From 1782 until 1798, Rutledge served in the State legislature, which designated him as a presidential elector three times. During this time, his distrust of unrestricted republicanism strengthened his conservative views and led him to join the Federalist Party. In his personal life, he thrived, with his wealth growing through his law practice and investments in plantations. In 1792, his first wife passed away, and he remarried. To top off his achievements, six years later, the people of South Carolina elected him as Governor. However, due to poor health, he passed away in Charleston early in 1800 at the age of 50, nearly a year before his term ended. The yard of St. Philip’s Episcopal Church is where he is buried.


Roger Sherman

CONNECTICUT

CONNECTICUT

By dint of self-education, hard work, and business acumen, Roger Sherman soared above his humble origins to prominence in local, State, and National political affairs. He was a member of the committee that drafted the Declaration of Independence. He and Robert Morris were the only men to sign the three bulwark documents of the Republic: the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, and Constitution. Twice married, Sherman fathered 15 children.

Through hard work, self-education, and his business acumen, Roger Sherman transformed his humble beginnings into a significant role in local, state, and national politics. He was a member of the committee that drafted the Declaration of Independence. Along with Robert Morris, he was one of only two individuals to sign the three key documents of the Republic: the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution. Sherman married twice and had 15 children.

In 1723, when Sherman was 2 years of age, his family relocated from his Newton, Mass., birthplace to Dorchester (present Stoughton). As a boy, he was spurred by a desire to learn, and read widely in his spare time to supplement his minimal education at a common school. But he spent most of his waking hours helping his father with farming chores and learning the cobbler’s trade from him. In 1743, or 2 years after his father’s death, Sherman joined an elder brother who had settled at New Milford, Conn.

In 1723, when Sherman was 2 years old, his family moved from his birthplace in Newton, Mass., to Dorchester (now Stoughton). As a child, he was driven by a desire to learn and read a lot in his free time to make up for his limited education at a local school. However, he spent most of his waking hours assisting his father with farming tasks and learning the cobbler's trade from him. In 1743, two years after his father's death, Sherman joined an older brother who had settled in New Milford, Conn.

130 Purchasing a store, becoming county surveyor, and winning a variety of town offices, Sherman prospered and assumed leadership in the community. Without benefit of a legal education, he was admitted to the bar in 1754 and embarked upon a distinguished judicial and political career. In the period 1755–61, except for a brief interval, he served as a representative in the colonial legislature and held the offices of justice of the peace and county judge. Somehow he also eked out time to publish an essay on monetary theory and a series of almanacs incorporating his own astronomical observations and verse.

130 Sherman thrived in the community by buying a store, becoming the county surveyor, and winning various local offices. Even without a law degree, he was admitted to the bar in 1754 and began a notable career in law and politics. From 1755 to 1761, with just a short break, he was a representative in the colonial legislature and also held positions as a justice of the peace and county judge. Somehow, he managed to find time to publish an essay on monetary theory and a series of almanacs that included his own astronomical observations and poetry.

In 1761, abandoning his law practice, Sherman moved to New Haven, Conn. There he managed a store that catered to Yale students and another one in nearby Wallingford. He also became a friend and benefactor of Yale College, functioning for many years as its treasurer.

In 1761, leaving his law practice behind, Sherman moved to New Haven, Connecticut. There, he ran a store that served Yale students and another in nearby Wallingford. He also became a friend and supporter of Yale College, serving for many years as its treasurer.

Residence of Roger Sherman, in New Haven, Conn., from 1768 until his death in 1793.

Meanwhile, Sherman’s political career had blossomed. He rose from justice of the peace and county judge to an associate judge of the Connecticut Superior Court and to representative in both houses of the colonial assembly. Although opposed to extremism, he early joined the fight against Britain. He supported nonimportation measures and headed the New Haven committee of correspondence.

Meanwhile, Sherman’s political career had flourished. He advanced from justice of the peace and county judge to an associate judge of the Connecticut Superior Court and served as a representative in both houses of the colonial assembly. Although against extremism, he quickly joined the fight against Britain. He backed nonimportation measures and led the New Haven committee of correspondence.

131 Sherman was a longtime and influential Member of the Continental Congress (1774–81 and 1783–84). He won membership on the committees that drafted the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation, as well as those concerned with Indian affairs, national finance, and military matters. To solve economic problems, at both the National and State levels, he advocated high taxes rather than excessive borrowing or the issuance of paper currency. While in Congress, Sherman remained active in State and local politics, continuing to hold the office of judge of the Connecticut Superior Court, as well as membership on the council of safety. In 1783 he helped codify Connecticut’s statutory laws. The next year, he was elected mayor of New Haven (1784–86).

131 Sherman was a longtime and influential member of the Continental Congress (1774–81 and 1783–84). He was part of the committees that drafted the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation, as well as those dealing with Indian affairs, national finance, and military issues. To address economic problems at both the national and state levels, he supported high taxes instead of excessive borrowing or printing paper money. While in Congress, Sherman was also active in state and local politics, continuing to serve as a judge of the Connecticut Superior Court and being part of the council of safety. In 1783, he helped codify Connecticut’s laws. The following year, he was elected mayor of New Haven (1784–86).

Sherman could not resist the lure of national service. In 1787 he represented his State at the Constitutional Convention, in which he played a major role. He conceived and introduced the Connecticut, or so-called Great, Compromise, which broke a deadlock between the large and small States by providing for a dual legislative system—representation by proportion of population in the lower house and equal representation in the upper house. He was also instrumental in Connecticut’s ratification of the Constitution.

Sherman couldn't resist the appeal of serving his country. In 1787, he represented his state at the Constitutional Convention, where he played a significant role. He came up with and introduced the Connecticut, or Great, Compromise, which resolved a stalemate between large and small states by establishing a dual legislative system—representation based on population in the lower house and equal representation in the upper house. He also played a key role in Connecticut's ratification of the Constitution.

Sherman capped his career by serving as U.S. Representative (1789–91) and Senator (1791–93), espousing the Federalist cause. He died at New Haven in 1793 at the age of 72 and is buried in the Grove Street Cemetery.

Sherman wrapped up his career by serving as a U.S. Representative (1789–91) and Senator (1791–93), supporting the Federalist cause. He passed away in New Haven in 1793 at the age of 72 and is buried in Grove Street Cemetery.


132

132

James Smith

PENNSYLVANIA

PENN.

James Smith, a lawyer who had emigrated from Ireland to the Colonies, represented the Pennsylvania back-country in Revolutionary conventions and the Continental Congress. He also helped draft the Pennsylvania constitution.

James Smith, a lawyer who relocated from Ireland to the Colonies, represented the Pennsylvania backcountry in Revolutionary conventions and the Continental Congress. He also contributed to drafting the Pennsylvania constitution.

Smith, the second son in a large family, was born in northern Ireland about 1719. When he was around 10 years old, his father emigrated to America and settled on acreage west of the Susquehanna River in York County, Pa. James studied surveying and classical languages at Rev. Francis Alison’s academy in New London, Pa., and then read law in the office of his elder brother at Lancaster. He was admitted to the bar in 1745 and moved westward to the Shippensburg vicinity in Cumberland County. A lack of clients and surveying work caused him about 1750 to relocate eastward to York, where he married a decade later. Although he was the only lawyer in town until 1769, he experienced difficulty in recruiting clients. Probably for this reason, during the years 1771–78 he undertook iron manufacturing, but the venture failed and he lost £5,000.

Smith, the second son in a large family, was born in northern Ireland around 1719. When he was about 10 years old, his father moved to America and settled on land west of the Susquehanna River in York County, Pa. James studied surveying and classical languages at Rev. Francis Alison’s academy in New London, Pa., and then studied law in the office of his older brother in Lancaster. He was admitted to the bar in 1745 and moved west to the Shippensburg area in Cumberland County. A lack of clients and surveying work led him to move back east to York around 1750, where he got married a decade later. Although he was the only lawyer in town until 1769, he struggled to attract clients. Likely for this reason, between 1771 and 1778, he tried his hand at iron manufacturing, but the business failed and he lost £5,000.

Smith early emerged as a local Whig leader. In 1774, at a provincial convention in Philadelphia, he supported nonimportation measures and advocated an intercolonial congress. That same year, at York he raised a militia company, in which he served as captain and later honorary colonel. At two provincial meetings in 1775–76, he championed the interests of the western counties and helped formulate133 resolutions calling for independence, the strengthening of defenses, and establishment of a new provincial government. During the latter year, he sat on the drafting committee in the State constitutional convention. Elected to Congress (1776–78) on July 20, 1776, after the vote on independence had been taken, he arrived in Philadelphia in time to sign the Declaration. Among his colleagues he gained a reputation as a wit, conversationalist, and eccentric.

Smith quickly became a local Whig leader. In 1774, at a provincial convention in Philadelphia, he supported non-importation measures and pushed for an intercolonial congress. That same year, in York, he raised a militia company, serving as captain and later as honorary colonel. At two provincial meetings in 1775-76, he advocated for the interests of the western counties and helped create133 resolutions calling for independence, enhanced defenses, and the establishment of a new provincial government. During that year, he was part of the drafting committee at the State constitutional convention. He was elected to Congress (1776-78) on July 20, 1776, right after the vote on independence, and arrived in Philadelphia just in time to sign the Declaration. Among his peers, he earned a reputation as a witty conversationalist and an eccentric.

During the period 1779–82 Smith held various State offices: one-term legislator, judge of the Pennsylvania high court of errors and appeals, brigadier general in the militia, and State counselor during the Wyoming Valley land dispute between Pennsylvania and Connecticut. In 1785 he turned down reelection to Congress because of his age. His major activity prior to his retirement in 1801 was the practice of law. Smith died at about the age of 87 in 1806 at York, survived by two of his five children. His grave is in the First Presbyterian Church Cemetery.

During the years 1779–82, Smith held several state positions: he was a one-term legislator, a judge on Pennsylvania's high court of errors and appeals, a brigadier general in the militia, and a state counselor during the Wyoming Valley land dispute between Pennsylvania and Connecticut. In 1785, he declined reelection to Congress due to his age. His main focus before retiring in 1801 was practicing law. Smith passed away around the age of 87 in 1806 in York, leaving behind two of his five children. His burial site is in the First Presbyterian Church Cemetery.

134

134


Richard Stockton

NEW JERSEY

NEW JERSEY

Circumstances of the times draw some men into public life who otherwise might avoid its burdens—and sorrows. One of these was Richard Stockton, whose wartime detention by the British contributed to his untimely death.

The events of the era draw some individuals into public life who would normally avoid its challenges and hardships. One such person was Richard Stockton, whose capture by the British during the war resulted in his premature death.

Stockton, son of a wealthy landowner and judge, was born in 1730 at Morven, the family estate and his lifelong home, at Princeton, N.J. After a preparatory education at West Nottingham Academy, in Rising Sun, Md., he graduated in 1748 from the College of New Jersey (later Princeton University), then in Newark but relocated 8 years hence at Princeton. In 1754 he completed an apprenticeship with a Newark lawyer and joined the bar. The next year, he wed poetess Annis Boudinot, by whom he had two sons and four daughters. By the mid-1760’s he was recognized as one of the ablest lawyers in the Middle Colonies.

Stockton, the son of a wealthy landowner and judge, was born in 1730 at Morven, the family estate and his lifelong home, in Princeton, N.J. After getting his early education at West Nottingham Academy in Rising Sun, Md., he graduated in 1748 from the College of New Jersey (later Princeton University), which had moved from Newark to Princeton eight years earlier. In 1754, he finished an apprenticeship with a lawyer in Newark and joined the bar. The following year, he married poetess Annis Boudinot, with whom he had two sons and four daughters. By the mid-1760s, he was recognized as one of the top lawyers in the Middle Colonies.

Like his father a patron of the College of New Jersey, in 1766 Stockton sailed on its behalf to Scotland to recruit Rev. John Witherspoon for the presidency. Aiding in this endeavor, complicated by the opposition of Witherspoon’s wife, was Benjamin Rush, a fellow alumnus then enrolled at the University of Edinburgh. In 1768, the year after Stockton’s departure, Witherspoon finally accepted.

Like his father, a supporter of the College of New Jersey, in 1766, Stockton traveled to Scotland to recruit Rev. John Witherspoon for the presidency. Benjamin Rush, a fellow alumnus who was studying at the University of Edinburgh at the time, helped with this effort, which was complicated by Witherspoon’s wife's objections. In 1768, the year after Stockton left, Witherspoon finally agreed to take the position.

Stockton resumed his law practice, spending his spare hours at Morven breeding choice cattle and horses, collecting art objects, and expanding his library. Yet, though he had some time before expressed disinterest in public life, in 1768 he began a 6-year term on the executive council of New Jersey and then sat on the provincial Supreme Court (1774–76).

Stockton went back to his law practice, using his free time at Morven to breed quality cattle and horses, collect art, and grow his library. However, even though he had previously shown no interest in public life, in 1768 he started a 6-year term on the executive council of New Jersey and then served on the provincial Supreme Court (1774–76).

Stockton became associated with the Revolutionary movement during its initial stages. In 1764 he advocated American representation in Parliament, but during the Stamp Act crisis the next year questioned its right to control the Colonies at all. By 1774, though dreading the possibility of war, he was espousing colonial self-rule under the Crown. Elected to Congress 2 years later, he voted for independence and signed the Declaration. That same year, he met defeat in a bid for the New Jersey governorship, but rejected the chance to become first chief justice of the State Supreme Court to remain in Congress.

Stockton got involved with the Revolutionary movement early on. In 1764, he pushed for American representation in Parliament, but during the Stamp Act crisis the following year, he questioned Parliament's right to control the Colonies at all. By 1774, despite fearing the possibility of war, he was advocating for colonial self-rule under the Crown. Two years later, he was elected to Congress, where he voted for independence and signed the Declaration. That same year, he lost in his attempt to become the governor of New Jersey, but turned down the opportunity to be the first chief justice of the State Supreme Court to stay in Congress.

Late in 1776 fate turned against Stockton. In November, while inspecting the northern Continental Army in upper New York State with fellow Congressman George Clymer, Stockton hurried home when he learned of the British invasion of New Jersey and removed his family to a friend’s home in Monmouth County. While he was there, Loyalists informed the British, who captured and imprisoned him under harsh conditions at Perth Amboy, N.J., and later in New135 York. A formal remonstrance from Congress and other efforts to obtain his exchange resulted in his release, in poor physical condition, sometime in 1777. To add to his woes, he found that the British had pillaged and partially burned Morven. Still an invalid, he died at Princeton in 1781 at the age of 50. He is buried at the Stony Brook Quaker Meeting House Cemetery.

Late in 1776, things took a turn for the worse for Stockton. In November, while reviewing the northern Continental Army in upstate New York with fellow Congressman George Clymer, Stockton rushed home after hearing about the British invasion of New Jersey and moved his family to a friend's place in Monmouth County. While he was there, Loyalists tipped off the British, who captured him and imprisoned him under harsh conditions in Perth Amboy, N.J., and later in New York. A formal complaint from Congress and other efforts to secure his release eventually led to him being freed, although he was in poor health, sometime in 1777. To make matters worse, he discovered that the British had looted and partially burned Morven. Still unwell, he passed away in Princeton in 1781 at the age of 50. He is buried at the Stony Brook Quaker Meeting House Cemetery.


Thomas Stone

MARYLAND

MARYLAND

By the time the Continental Congress voted for independence from Great Britain on July 2, 1776, only a handful of conservatives remained in the body. Included in this group were Thomas Stone of Maryland, Carter Braxton of Virginia, George Read of Delaware, and Edward Rutledge of South Carolina—erstwhile opponents of independence who, except for Read, submitted to the will of the majority and balloted for it. Stone, a rich planter-lawyer of retiring disposition, preferred to stay in the background during his long but limited political career.

When the Continental Congress voted for independence from Great Britain on July 2, 1776, only a small number of conservatives remained in the group. This included Thomas Stone from Maryland, Carter Braxton from Virginia, George Read from Delaware, and Edward Rutledge from South Carolina—who were once against independence but, except for Read, went along with the majority's decision and voted in favor. Stone, a wealthy planter-lawyer known for his quiet personality, preferred to stay out of the spotlight during his lengthy but limited political career.

Stone was born in 1743 at Poynton Manor, his father’s plantation near the village of Welcome in Charles County, Md. He enjoyed all the advantages that accrued to the eldest son. Following tutorial instruction in the classics as a youth, he apprenticed himself to an Annapolis lawyer and in 1764 joined the bar. For the first 2 years he practiced at Frederick, Md., and then settled in his home county. He married 2 years later. Apparently with part of his wife’s dowry, he purchased land a few miles to the northeast of his birthplace.136 There, near Port Tobacco, in 1771 he built Habre-de-Venture, his home and principal residence for the rest of his life.

Stone was born in 1743 at Poynton Manor, his father's plantation near the village of Welcome in Charles County, Maryland. He had all the benefits that came with being the eldest son. After receiving private tutoring in the classics as a child, he apprenticed with a lawyer in Annapolis and joined the bar in 1764. For the first two years, he practiced in Frederick, Maryland, and then moved back to his home county. He got married two years later. Using part of his wife's dowry, he bought land a few miles northeast of where he was born. There, near Port Tobacco, he built Habre-de-Venture in 1771, which became his home and primary residence for the rest of his life.136

Stone entered politics in 1773 as a member of the Charles County committee of correspondence. The next year, on behalf of the Proprietary Governor, he helped prosecute Joseph H. Harrison, a Maryland legislator who had refused to pay the poll tax for the support of the Anglican clergy. This action, despite its legal ethicality, did not endear Stone to the patriots. His opponents, counsel for the defense, consisted of Thomas Johnson, Samuel Chase, and William Paca—all three of whom later became his congressional colleagues.

Stone got into politics in 1773 as a member of the Charles County committee of correspondence. The following year, representing the Proprietary Governor, he helped prosecute Joseph H. Harrison, a Maryland legislator who had refused to pay the poll tax for the support of the Anglican clergy. Although this action was legally ethical, it didn't win Stone any favor with the patriots. His opponents, who represented the defense, included Thomas Johnson, Samuel Chase, and William Paca—all three of whom would later become his colleagues in Congress.

That same year, 1774, Stone won appointment to the provincial convention, which the following year sent him to Congress. A far less enthusiastic Revolutionary than most Congressmen, he heartily favored reconciliation almost up to the time of the vote on independence and was one of the few Delegates who favored peace negotiations with Britisher Lord Richard Howe in September 1776, some 2 months after the adoption of the Declaration. A poor speaker, Stone rarely participated in debates but sat on the committee that drafted the Articles of Confederation, though he did not sign the document. He remained in Congress until 1778.

That same year, 1774, Stone was appointed to the provincial convention, which sent him to Congress the following year. Unlike most Congressmen, he was not very enthusiastic about the Revolution and strongly supported reconciliation almost up until the vote on independence. He was one of the few Delegates who backed peace talks with British Lord Richard Howe in September 1776, about two months after the Declaration was adopted. Not a great speaker, Stone rarely took part in debates but was on the committee that drafted the Articles of Confederation, although he did not sign the document. He stayed in Congress until 1778.

Meantime, a couple of years earlier, Stone had begun a tour in the State senate that was to last for practically the remainder of his life. In 1784 he also returned to the Continental Congress, where he served for a few days as acting President but resigned before the year expired to resume his law practice. His last act of public service occurred the following year, when he and two others represented Maryland at the Mount Vernon Conference.

Meantime, a couple of years earlier, Stone had started a tour in the State Senate that would last for almost the rest of his life. In 1784, he also went back to the Continental Congress, where he served for a few days as acting President but stepped down before the year was over to return to his law practice. His final act of public service took place the following year when he and two others represented Maryland at the Mount Vernon Conference.

In 1787 Stone’s wife, whose health had been failing for more than a decade, passed away at the age of 34. The grief-stricken Stone abandoned his work, declined to attend the Constitutional Convention to which he had been elected, and decided to visit England. A few months later, though only in his mid-forties, he died suddenly while awaiting a vessel at Alexandria, Va. Three of his children survived him. Stone is buried in the family graveyard adjacent to Habre-de-Venture.

In 1787, Stone's wife, who had been in poor health for over a decade, died at the age of 34. Heartbroken, Stone stopped working, refused to go to the Constitutional Convention he had been elected to, and chose to travel to England. A few months later, despite being only in his mid-forties, he died unexpectedly while waiting for a ship in Alexandria, Va. Three of his children survived him. Stone is buried in the family graveyard next to Habre-de-Venture.


137

137

George Taylor

PENNSYLVANIA

PENNSYLVANIA

Surmounting the poverty that forced him to come to the American Colonies from Ireland as an indentured servant to an ironmaster, George Taylor climbed to the top of the industry. In the process, merging politics with commerce, he gained enough distinction in county and State affairs to win election to the Continental Congress—his only service on the national level. Even then, he attended only a few months, just long enough to sign the Declaration. He contributed more directly to the cause of liberty as an ironmaster, producing ordnance for the Continental Army.

George Taylor overcame the poverty that drove him to migrate from Ireland to the American Colonies as an indentured servant to an ironmaster, eventually reaching the highest level of the industry. By combining politics with business, he gained enough recognition in local and state issues to be elected to the Continental Congress—his only national experience. However, he only served for a few months, just long enough to sign the Declaration. He contributed more directly to the cause of freedom as an ironmaster, producing weapons for the Continental Army.

When Taylor was about 20 years of age, he indentured himself and emigrated from northern Ireland, where he had been born in 1716, to Pennsylvania. He began as a laborer and then became a clerk at Warwick Furnace, in Chester County, and within 3 years rose to bookkeeper-manager of nearby Coventry Forge, another enterprise of his employer. In 1742, the year after the latter died, Taylor acquired his business when he married his widow; she bore him a son and daughter.

When Taylor was around 20 years old, he signed an indenture and moved from Northern Ireland, where he was born in 1716, to Pennsylvania. He started as a laborer and later became a clerk at Warwick Furnace in Chester County. Within three years, he was promoted to bookkeeper-manager at Coventry Forge, another business owned by his employer. In 1742, the year after the latter passed away, Taylor took over the business by marrying his widow; she had a son and a daughter with him.

In the mid-1750’s Taylor moved northeastward to Bucks County, where he and a partner leased Durham Furnace, about 2 miles south of the Northampton County line and 10 miles south of Easton. Apparently after 1763 Taylor lived much of the time at or near Easton and acquired property there. In 1768 his wife died; he subsequently sired five children by his housekeeper out of wedlock. The year of his wife’s death, he built a home about 15 miles west of the138 city on a 331-acre tract he had purchased the year before. In 1771 he leased most of the land out as a farm, and 5 years later sold the house and land.

In the mid-1750s, Taylor moved northeast to Bucks County, where he and a partner leased Durham Furnace, located about 2 miles south of the Northampton County line and 10 miles south of Easton. After 1763, Taylor seemingly spent a lot of his time at or near Easton and bought property there. In 1768, his wife passed away; he then fathered five children with his housekeeper out of wedlock. The year his wife died, he built a home about 15 miles west of the138 city on a 331-acre piece of land he had bought the year before. In 1771, he leased most of the land as a farm, and five years later, he sold the house and land.

Taylor had begun his public life in 1747, when he took a commission as a captain in the Chester County militia. In 1761 he was appointed as justice of the peace for Bucks County, but devoted most of his energies to Northampton County, which he served as justice of the peace (1764–75) and representative in the colonial legislature (1764–70). In 1774 Taylor, a political moderate, became a member of the Northampton County committee of correspondence. The next year, he attended a provincial Revolutionary convention, was elected to the provincial assembly, served on the council of safety, and became a colonel in the Bucks and Northampton County militias.

Taylor began his public life in 1747 when he became a captain in the Chester County militia. In 1761, he was appointed a justice of the peace for Bucks County, but he focused most of his efforts on Northampton County, where he served as justice of the peace (1764–75) and as a representative in the colonial legislature (1764–70). In 1774, Taylor, who was politically moderate, joined the Northampton County committee of correspondence. The following year, he participated in a provincial Revolutionary convention, was elected to the provincial assembly, served on the council of safety, and became a colonel in the Bucks and Northampton County militias.

In July 1776 the Pennsylvania assembly selected Taylor as one of its new Delegates to the Continental Congress. His only noteworthy action there was signing the Declaration. The next January, however, he and fellow signer George Walton of Georgia negotiated a peace treaty with the Six Indian Nations (Iroquois) at Easton, Pa., but Congress did not ratify it. In March the voters of Northampton County elected Taylor to the new Supreme Executive Assembly of Pennsylvania, but illness and financial difficulties restricted his participation to only 6 weeks, at the end of which he retired from public life.

In July 1776, the Pennsylvania assembly chose Taylor as one of its new Delegates to the Continental Congress. His only significant action there was signing the Declaration. The following January, however, he and fellow signer George Walton from Georgia negotiated a peace treaty with the Six Indian Nations (Iroquois) in Easton, Pa., but Congress did not approve it. In March, voters in Northampton County elected Taylor to the new Supreme Executive Assembly of Pennsylvania, but illness and financial issues limited his participation to just 6 weeks, after which he stepped back from public life.

By this time, Taylor’s Durham Furnace was turning out grapeshot, cannonballs, bar shot, and cannon for the Revolutionary army—for which Taylor was ill-compensated. In 1778 the State dispossessed him of his lease on the Durham Furnace, owned by the Philadelphia Loyalist John Galloway and confiscated by the State. Taylor then moved to Greenwich Township, N.J., and leased Greenwich Forge, which he operated until his death at the age of 65 in 1781. The year before, his health failing, Taylor had returned to Easton and leased a home. Originally buried in the yard of the German Evangelical Lutheran Church at Easton, his body was later moved to the Easton Cemetery.

By this time, Taylor’s Durham Furnace was producing grapeshot, cannonballs, bar shot, and cannons for the Revolutionary army—though he was poorly compensated for it. In 1778, the State took away his lease on the Durham Furnace, which belonged to the Philadelphia Loyalist John Galloway and was seized by the State. Taylor then relocated to Greenwich Township, N.J., and leased Greenwich Forge, which he ran until he died at the age of 65 in 1781. The year before, as his health declined, Taylor returned to Easton and rented a home. He was initially buried in the yard of the German Evangelical Lutheran Church in Easton, but his body was later moved to the Easton Cemetery.


139

139

Matthew Thornton

NEW HAMPSHIRE

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Probably six of the 56 signers belatedly penned their signatures, eight of them were foreign-born, and four were physicians. Matthew Thornton belongs in all three categories. Less exclusively, he ranks among the substantial number of signers whose national service was brief or relatively insignificant.

Probably six out of the 56 signers added their names later, eight were born outside the country, and four were doctors. Matthew Thornton fits into all three categories. More broadly, he is part of the larger group of signers whose contributions to national service were brief or not very impactful.

Thornton was born in Ireland about 1714. Approximately 4 years later, his Scotch-Irish parents emigrated with their family to America, settling first at Wiscasset, in present Maine, and then near Worcester, Mass. Young Thornton, after attending common schools, undertook the study of medicine with a local doctor. In 1740 he began what proved to be a thriving practice in the Scotch-Irish town of Londonderry (present Derry Village), N.H. Five years later, as a surgeon in the New Hampshire militia during King George’s War (1740–48), he participated in the British expedition from New England that captured Louisbourg, the French fortress in Nova Scotia.

Thornton was born in Ireland around 1714. About four years later, his Scotch-Irish parents moved the family to America, initially settling in Wiscasset, now in Maine, and then near Worcester, Massachusetts. Young Thornton, after going to local schools, started studying medicine with a nearby doctor. In 1740, he launched what turned out to be a successful practice in the Scotch-Irish community of Londonderry (now Derry Village), New Hampshire. Five years later, serving as a surgeon in the New Hampshire militia during King George’s War (1740–48), he took part in the British expedition from New England that captured Louisbourg, the French fortress in Nova Scotia.

By 1758 Thornton was representing Londonderry in the colonial legislature and stayed there until 1775. During the long interim, about 1760 he married and began a family of five; and throughout the period he figured prominently in New Hampshire politics and Revolutionary activities. In 1775–76 he held the offices of president of the provincial assembly and constitutional convention, chairman140 of the council of safety, and member of the upper and lower houses of the legislature, as well as speaker of the former. Although he did not enter Congress until November 1776, or 3 months after the formal signing of the Declaration, he was granted permission to affix his signature.

By 1758, Thornton was representing Londonderry in the colonial legislature and stayed there until 1775. During that time, around 1760, he got married and started a family of five. Throughout this period, he played a significant role in New Hampshire politics and Revolutionary activities. In 1775–76, he held the positions of president of the provincial assembly and constitutional convention, chairman of the council of safety, and member of both the upper and lower houses of the legislature, as well as speaker of the former. Although he didn't join Congress until November 1776, three months after the formal signing of the Declaration, he was allowed to put his signature on it.

About a year later, Thornton left Congress to devote his time to his duties as associate justice of the State Superior Court. Despite a lack of legal education, he had acquired this position in 1776. He held it until 1782, some 2 years after he retired from his medical practice in Londonderry and settled on a farm he purchased near Merrimack, N.H. Later, in 1784–86, he completed a tour in the State senate. He spent his last years farming and operating a ferry—Lutwyche’s (later Thornton’s) Ferry—across the Merrimack River.

About a year later, Thornton left Congress to focus on his role as an associate justice of the State Superior Court. Even though he didn't have a formal legal education, he landed this position in 1776. He held it until 1782, about two years after he retired from his medical practice in Londonderry and settled on a farm he bought near Merrimack, N.H. Later, from 1784 to 1786, he served in the State Senate. He spent his final years farming and running a ferry—Lutwyche’s (later Thornton’s) Ferry—across the Merrimack River.

Thornton died in 1803 at about the age of 89 while visiting his daughter in Newburyport, Mass. His grave is in Thornton’s Ferry Cemetery, near the site of his Merrimack home.

Thornton died in 1803 at around the age of 89 while visiting his daughter in Newburyport, Massachusetts. His grave is in Thornton’s Ferry Cemetery, close to where his home in Merrimack was located.

141

141


George Walton

GEORGIA

GEORGIA

Like signers Button Gwinnett and Lyman Hall a nonnative of Georgia, George Walton fought hard to win independence for his adopted State and his Nation—both in the political arena and on the battlefield. He was wounded in the British siege of Savannah late in 1778 and endured captivity for almost a year. He evinced the same kind of tenacity in all his other endeavors and conquered a string of adversities in his ascent from humble origins to the highest National and State offices.

Like signers Button Gwinnett and Lyman Hall, who weren't originally from Georgia, George Walton worked hard to achieve independence for his adopted state and his country—both in politics and on the battlefield. He was injured during the British siege of Savannah in late 1778 and endured nearly a year in captivity. He displayed the same determination in all his other endeavors and overcame numerous challenges as he climbed from humble beginnings to the highest national and state positions.

Born sometime in the 1740’s near Farmville, Va., Walton was orphaned early and reared by an uncle, who apprenticed him to a carpenter. Walton supplemented extensive independent study with some formal schooling. In 1769 he moved to Savannah, Ga., read law under a local attorney, and 5 years later joined the bar.

Born in the 1740s near Farmville, VA, Walton lost his parents at a young age and was raised by an uncle, who trained him as a carpenter. Walton combined a lot of self-directed study with some formal education. In 1769, he relocated to Savannah, GA, studied law with a local attorney, and five years later became a licensed lawyer.

That same year, Walton plunged into politics. Rallying Revolutionaries at Savannah as did Lyman Hall in St. John’s Parish—the two Whig hotbeds in a lukewarm colony—Walton helped organize and played a key part in meetings at Savannah in July and August 1774 and the first provincial congress the next January. But these meetings, to which only a few parishes sent representatives, hardly set the dissent in motion. The divided delegates, aware of their limited constituency, failed to send Delegates to the Continental Congress, as had all the other Colonies, and thus alienated St. John’s Parish. Except for creation of a committee of correspondence, to which Walton was appointed, the conferees for the most part substituted patriotic talk for action. During this period, Walton, blending political activism with romance, took a bride. She later gave birth to two sons.

That same year, Walton got involved in politics. Gathering Revolutionaries in Savannah, just like Lyman Hall did in St. John’s Parish—the two Whig strongholds in a mostly apathetic colony—Walton helped organize and played a major role in meetings in Savannah during July and August 1774 and the first provincial congress the following January. However, these meetings, which only a handful of parishes sent representatives to, barely sparked any dissent. The divided delegates, aware of their limited support, didn’t send delegates to the Continental Congress like all the other colonies did, which alienated St. John’s Parish. Other than forming a committee of correspondence, which Walton was appointed to, the conference mostly replaced action with patriotic talk. During this time, Walton combined political activism with romance and got married. She later gave birth to two sons.

By July 1775, when the second provincial congress convened and designated Walton as secretary, apathy in the Revolutionary ranks had given way to aggressiveness. The congress dispatched four Delegates to the Continental Congress to join Hall, already an unofficial “delegate” from St. John’s Parish. The next year, the third provincial congress elected Walton, by this time chairman of the council of safety, as a Delegate (1776–81). In this capacity, he sat on committees dealing with western lands, national finance, and Indian affairs. His only lapse in attendance occurred in 1778–79, when the military defense of his own State took precedence over his congressional obligations. As a colonel in the Georgia militia, he was wounded and captured during the siege of Savannah in November-December 1778—the beginning of the British invasion of the South. He was imprisoned until the following September, when he was exchanged for a navy captain.

By July 1775, when the second provincial congress met and appointed Walton as secretary, the indifference in the Revolutionary ranks had turned into determination. The congress sent four delegates to the Continental Congress to join Hall, who was already acting as an unofficial “delegate” from St. John’s Parish. The following year, the third provincial congress elected Walton, who was now the chairman of the council of safety, as a Delegate (1776–81). In this role, he served on committees that focused on western lands, national finance, and Indian affairs. His only absence occurred in 1778–79 when the military defense of his own state took priority over his congressional responsibilities. As a colonel in the Georgia militia, he was wounded and captured during the siege of Savannah in November-December 1778, marking the start of the British invasion of the South. He was imprisoned until the next September, when he was swapped for a navy captain.

Right after his release, at Augusta Walton became involved in a factional dispute between two groups of Revolutionaries. Walton’s group, irritated because their conservative opponents had taken advantage of the confusion generated by the British occupation of Savannah by putting their own “governor” into office without142 benefit of a general election, countered by selecting Walton as its “governor” (November 1779-January 1780). In January the new legally elected legislature picked a Governor, another anti-conservative. Walton returned to the Continental Congress in 1780–81, after which he headed back to Georgia.

Right after his release, in Augusta, Walton got caught up in a power struggle between two factions of Revolutionaries. His group was frustrated because their conservative rivals had taken advantage of the chaos from the British occupation of Savannah to put their own “governor” in office without a general election. In response, they chose Walton as their “governor” (November 1779-January 1780). In January, the newly elected legislature appointed a Governor, another anti-conservative. Walton went back to the Continental Congress in 1780-81, and then he returned to Georgia.

Walton’s subsequent career suffered no diminution. His offices included those of chief justice (1783–89) and justice (1790–95 and 1799–1804) of the State Superior Court; delegate to the State constitutional convention (1788); presidential elector (1789); Governor (1789–90); and U.S. Senator (1795–96), filling out an unexpired term. Meantime, he had been elected as a delegate to the U.S. Constitutional Convention (1787), but did not attend. An advocate of higher education, he was also a trustee and founder of Richmond Academy, in Augusta, and Franklin College (later the University of Georgia), in Athens.

Walton's career continued to thrive. He held several positions, including chief justice (1783–89) and justice (1790–95 and 1799–1804) of the State Superior Court; delegate to the State constitutional convention (1788); presidential elector (1789); Governor (1789–90); and U.S. Senator (1795–96), completing an unexpired term. In addition, he was elected as a delegate to the U.S. Constitutional Convention (1787), though he didn't attend. A supporter of higher education, he also served as a trustee and founder of Richmond Academy in Augusta and Franklin College (which later became the University of Georgia) in Athens.

About 1790 while Governor, changing his residence from Savannah to the capital of Augusta, Walton built “Meadow Garden” cottage on the northern edge of the city on confiscated Loyalist lands he had acquired. He lived in the cottage for 5 years, when he moved to College Hill, a country estate he erected on the western outskirts. He died there in 1804. Assigned first to the Rosney Cemetery in Augusta, his remains now rest at the Signers’ Monument in that city.

About 1790, while serving as Governor, Walton moved his residence from Savannah to Augusta, the capital, where he built the “Meadow Garden” cottage on the northern edge of the city using confiscated Loyalist lands he had acquired. He lived in the cottage for five years before relocating to College Hill, a country estate he built on the western outskirts. He died there in 1804. Initially buried in Rosney Cemetery in Augusta, his remains now rest at the Signers’ Monument in that city.

143

143


William Whipple

NEW HAMPSHIRE

NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Whipple, a sea captain turned merchant, retired from business to further the Revolution. In addition to sitting in Congress, he commanded New Hampshire militia in two major campaigns and held various State offices.

William Whipple, a sea captain turned merchant, stepped away from business to support the Revolution. In addition to serving in Congress, he led the New Hampshire militia in two major campaigns and held several state positions.

Whipple, the eldest of five children, was born in 1730, at Kittery, in present Maine. He attended local schools and went to sea while still a boy. In his early twenties he became a shipmaster, and later probably sometimes engaged in the slave trade. About 1760 he gave up the sea and founded a mercantile firm at Portsmouth, N.H., with his brother Joseph. In 1767 he married the daughter of a wealthy merchant-sea captain; their only child died in infancy.

Whipple, the oldest of five siblings, was born in 1730 in Kittery, which is now part of Maine. He went to local schools and started sailing while he was still a kid. In his early twenties, he became a captain of his own ship and later likely participated in the slave trade at times. Around 1760, he left the sea and started a trading business in Portsmouth, N.H., with his brother Joseph. In 1767, he married the daughter of a wealthy merchant-sea captain; their only child passed away in infancy.

By the outbreak of the Revolution, Whipple had become one of the leading citizens of Portsmouth. In 1775, his fortune well established, he left business to devote his time to public affairs. That year, he represented Portsmouth in the provincial assembly at Exeter, and served on the New Hampshire council of safety. The following year, he won seats in the upper house of the State legislature and in the Continental Congress. His congressional tour, interrupted intermittently by militia duty, lasted until 1779. He concerned himself mainly with military, marine, and financial matters. A tough-minded, independent individual, he recommended military aggressiveness in the war instead of diplomacy and favored severe punishment of Loyalists and speculators.

By the time the Revolution broke out, Whipple had become one of the leading figures in Portsmouth. In 1775, with his wealth firmly established, he stepped away from business to focus on public service. That year, he represented Portsmouth in the provincial assembly in Exeter and served on the New Hampshire council of safety. The next year, he secured positions in the upper house of the State legislature and the Continental Congress. His time in Congress, which was occasionally interrupted by militia duties, continued until 1779. He mainly focused on military, maritime, and financial issues. Strong-minded and independent, he advocated for a more aggressive military approach in the war instead of relying on diplomacy and supported harsh penalties for Loyalists and speculators.

In the fall of 1777 Whipple, a brigadier general in the New Hampshire militia, led four regiments to upper New York State and helped encircle and besiege the British army at Saratoga. He was present on October 17 at the surrender of Gen. John Burgoyne; signed the Convention of Saratoga, ending the New York campaign; and helped escort the British troops to a winter encampment near Boston to await embarkation for England. In 1778 he led another contingent of New Hampshire militia into Rhode Island on a campaign that sought but failed to recapture Newport from the British.

In the fall of 1777, Whipple, a brigadier general in the New Hampshire militia, led four regiments to upper New York State and helped encircle and besiege the British army at Saratoga. He was present on October 17 for the surrender of Gen. John Burgoyne, signed the Convention of Saratoga, which ended the New York campaign, and helped escort the British troops to a winter camp near Boston to wait for their departure to England. In 1778, he led another group of New Hampshire militia into Rhode Island in an attempt to recapture Newport from the British, but they were unsuccessful.

During his last years, Whipple held the offices of State legislator (1780–84), associate justice of the New Hampshire Superior Court (1782–85), receiver of finances for Congress in New Hampshire (1782–84), and in 1782 president of a commission that arbitrated the Wyoming Valley land dispute between Connecticut and Pennsylvania. Ill the remaining few years of his life, he passed away in 1785 at the age of 55 at Portsmouth, where he was buried in Union Cemetery. His wife survived him.

During his final years, Whipple served as a state legislator (1780–84), an associate justice of the New Hampshire Superior Court (1782–85), the financial receiver for Congress in New Hampshire (1782–84), and in 1782 he was the president of a commission that resolved the Wyoming Valley land dispute between Connecticut and Pennsylvania. In the last few years of his life, he passed away in 1785 at the age of 55 in Portsmouth, where he was buried in Union Cemetery. His wife outlived him.


144

144

William Williams

CONNECTICUT

CONNECTICUT

Merchant William Williams was prominent in Connecticut politics, but never won national fame except for signing the Declaration.

Merchant William Williams was an important player in Connecticut politics, but he never became nationally famous except for signing the Declaration.

A Congregational pastor’s son, Williams was born in 1731 at Lebanon, Conn., his lifelong home. After graduating from Harvard in 1751, he began studying for the ministry under his father. Four years later, during the French and Indian War (1754–63), he accompanied a British expedition to Lake George, in northeastern New York, that won a victory. Back home, he became a merchant. In 1771 he married a daughter of Jonathan Trumbull, Royal Governor of Connecticut; they had three children.

A Congregational pastor's son, Williams was born in 1731 in Lebanon, Connecticut, where he lived his entire life. After graduating from Harvard in 1751, he started studying for the ministry under his father. Four years later, during the French and Indian War (1754–63), he joined a British expedition to Lake George in northeastern New York, which achieved a victory. Back home, he became a merchant. In 1771, he married a daughter of Jonathan Trumbull, the Royal Governor of Connecticut; they had three children.

During his long political career, Williams held a myriad of local, provincial, and State offices: town clerk (1752–96) and selectman (1760–85); member, clerk, and speaker of the lower house of the colonial legislature (1755–76); State legislator (1781–84); member of the Governor’s council (1784–1803); judge of the Windham County court (1776–1805); and probate judge for the Windham district (1775–1809). He also represented Connecticut at various New England meetings, and attended the 1788 convention that ratified the Federal Constitution, of which he approved.

During his long political career, Williams held numerous local, state, and provincial offices: town clerk (1752–96) and selectman (1760–85); member, clerk, and speaker of the lower house of the colonial legislature (1755–76); state legislator (1781–84); member of the Governor’s council (1784–1803); judge of the Windham County court (1776–1805); and probate judge for the Windham district (1775–1809). He also represented Connecticut at various New England meetings and attended the 1788 convention that ratified the Federal Constitution, which he supported.

145 Upon the outbreak of the Revolution, Williams threw his weight behind the cause. Besides writing tracts for the press expressing the colonial viewpoint, he prepared Revolutionary state papers for Governor Trumbull. Williams also raised money for and personally contributed to the war effort. Between 1773 and 1776 he held a colonelcy in the Connecticut militia and served on the provincial council of safety. In Congress (1776–78 and 1783–84), he sat on the Board of War and helped frame the Articles of Confederation, though he did not sign them. During the winter of 1780–81, while a French regiment was stationed in Lebanon, he moved out of his home and turned it over to the officers.

145 When the Revolution started, Williams threw his support behind the cause. In addition to writing pamphlets for the press that expressed the colonial perspective, he prepared Revolutionary state papers for Governor Trumbull. Williams also raised funds for and personally contributed to the war effort. Between 1773 and 1776, he held the rank of colonel in the Connecticut militia and served on the provincial council of safety. In Congress (1776–78 and 1783–84), he was on the Board of War and helped draft the Articles of Confederation, although he did not sign them. During the winter of 1780–81, while a French regiment was stationed in Lebanon, he moved out of his house and gave it to the officers.

Williams died at the age of 80 in 1811. His grave is in the Trumbull Cemetery, about a mile northeast of town.

Williams died at the age of 80 in 1811. His grave is in Trumbull Cemetery, around a mile northeast of town.


James Wilson

PENNSYLVANIA

PENNSYLVANIA

Brilliant yet enigmatic James Wilson possessed one of the most complex and contradictory personalities of all the signers. Never able to reconcile his strong personal drive for wealth and power with his political goals nor to find a middle road between conservatism and republicanism, he alternately experienced either popularity or public scorn, fame or obscurity, wealth or poverty. Yet his mastery of the law and political theory enabled him to play a leading role in framing the U.S. Constitution and to rise from frontier lawyer to Justice of the Supreme Court.

Brilliant yet enigmatic, James Wilson had one of the most complex and contradictory personalities among the signers. He struggled to balance his strong personal ambitions for wealth and power with his political goals, nor could he reconcile conservatism with republicanism. Consequently, he swung between popularity and public disdain, fame and obscurity, wealth and poverty. However, his knowledge of law and political theory enabled him to play a key role in shaping the U.S. Constitution and transition from being a frontier lawyer to a Justice of the Supreme Court.

Wilson was born in 1741 or 1742 at Carskerdo, near St. Andrews, Scotland, and educated at the universities of St. Andrews, Glasgow, and Edinburgh. He then emigrated to America, arriving in the midst146 of the Stamp Act agitations in 1765. Early the next year, he accepted a position as Latin tutor at the College of Philadelphia, but almost immediately abandoned it to study law under John Dickinson.

Wilson was born in 1741 or 1742 at Carskerdo, near St. Andrews, Scotland, and studied at the universities of St. Andrews, Glasgow, and Edinburgh. He then moved to America, arriving during the Stamp Act protests in 1765. Early the next year, he took a job as a Latin tutor at the College of Philadelphia but quickly left it to study law under John Dickinson.

From 1778 until 1790 James Wilson resided in this Philadelphia residence, which became known as “Fort Wilson” in 1779, when a mob of citizens and militiamen attacked it.

In 1768, the year after his admission to the bar, Wilson set up practice at Reading, Pa. Two years later, he moved westward to the Scotch-Irish settlement of Carlisle, and the following year took a bride. He specialized in land law and built up a broad clientele. On borrowed capital, he also began to speculate in land. In some way he managed, too, to lecture for many years on English literature at the College of Philadelphia.

In 1768, the year after he became a lawyer, Wilson started his practice in Reading, Pa. Two years later, he moved west to the Scotch-Irish community of Carlisle, and the next year he got married. He focused on land law and developed a wide range of clients. Using borrowed funds, he also started investing in land. Somehow, he also managed to teach English literature for many years at the College of Philadelphia.

Wilson also became involved in Revolutionary politics. In 1774 he took over chairmanship of the Carlisle committee of correspondence, attended the first provincial assembly, and completed preparation of Considerations on the Nature and Extent of the Legislative Authority of the British Parliament. This tract circulated widely in England and America and established Wilson as a Whig leader. It denied Parliament’s authority over the Colonies, though it did not question their allegiance to the Crown, and recommended a147 reorganization of the imperial structure similar to the later British Commonwealth of Nations.

Wilson also got involved in Revolutionary politics. In 1774, he took over as chairman of the Carlisle committee of correspondence, attended the first provincial assembly, and finished preparing Considerations on the Nature and Extent of the Legislative Authority of the British Parliament. This pamphlet spread widely in England and America and established Wilson as a Whig leader. It rejected Parliament’s authority over the Colonies, though it didn’t question their loyalty to the Crown, and recommended a147 reorganization of the imperial structure similar to the later British Commonwealth of Nations.

The next year, Wilson was elected to both the provincial assembly and the Continental Congress, where he sat mainly on military and Indian affairs committees. In 1776, reflecting the wishes of his constituents, he joined the moderates in voting for a 3-week delay in considering Richard Henry Lee’s resolution of June 7. On July 1, however, Wilson dissented from the majority of the Pennsylvania delegation and balloted with John Morton and Benjamin Franklin for independence. On July 2 the three men, representing a majority of the Commonwealth’s Delegates present, voted the same. Wilson’s strenuous opposition to the republican Pennsylvania constitution of 1776, besides indicating a switch to conservatism on his part, led to his removal from Congress the following year. To avoid the clamor among his frontier constituents, he repaired to Annapolis during the winter of 1777–78, and then took up residence in Philadelphia.

The next year, Wilson was elected to both the provincial assembly and the Continental Congress, where he mainly served on military and Indian affairs committees. In 1776, reflecting his constituents' wishes, he joined the moderates in voting for a 3-week delay in considering Richard Henry Lee’s resolution from June 7. However, on July 1, Wilson went against the majority of the Pennsylvania delegation and voted with John Morton and Benjamin Franklin for independence. On July 2, the three men, representing a majority of the Commonwealth’s Delegates present, voted the same way. Wilson's strong opposition to the republican Pennsylvania constitution of 1776, besides showing a shift to conservatism on his part, led to his removal from Congress the following year. To avoid the backlash from his frontier constituents, he went to Annapolis during the winter of 1777–78 and then moved to Philadelphia.

Wilson affirmed his newly assumed political stance by closely identifying with the aristocratic and conservative republican groups, multiplying his business interests, and accelerating his land speculation. He also took a position as Advocate-General for France in America (1779–83), dealing with commercial and maritime matters, and legally defended Loyalists and their sympathizers.

Wilson confirmed his new political views by aligning himself with aristocratic and conservative republican groups, expanding his business interests, and ramping up his land speculation. He also served as Advocate-General for France in America (1779–83), handling commercial and maritime issues, and legally representing Loyalists and their supporters.

In the fall of 1779, during a period of inflation and food shortages, a mob, including many militiamen and led by radical-constitutionalists, set out to attack the republican leadership. Wilson was a prime target. He and some 35 of his colleagues barricaded themselves in his home at Third and Walnut Streets, henceforth known as “Fort Wilson.” During a brief skirmish, several people on both sides were killed or wounded. The shock cooled sentiments and pardons were issued all around, though major political battles over the Commonwealth constitution still lay ahead.

In the fall of 1779, during a time of inflation and food shortages, a mob made up of many militiamen and led by radical constitutionalists planned to attack the republican leadership. Wilson was a main target. He and about 35 of his colleagues locked themselves in his home at Third and Walnut Streets, which became known as “Fort Wilson.” During a short skirmish, several people from both sides were killed or injured. The shock of the violence calmed tempers, and pardons were granted all around, although significant political conflicts over the Commonwealth constitution were still to come.

During 1781 Congress appointed Wilson as one of the directors of the Bank of North America, newly founded by Robert Morris with the legal advice of Wilson. In 1782–83, by which time the conservatives had regained some of their power, he was reelected to Congress, as well as in the period 1785–87.

During 1781, Congress appointed Wilson as one of the directors of the Bank of North America, which had recently been founded by Robert Morris with legal advice from Wilson. In 1782–83, by which time the conservatives had regained some power, he was reelected to Congress, as well as during the period of 1785–87.

Wilson reached the apex of his career in the U.S. Constitutional Convention (1787), in which he was one of the leaders, both in the floor debates and the drafting committee. That same year, overcoming powerful opposition, he led the drive for ratification in148 Pennsylvania, the second State to ratify. The new Commonwealth constitution, drafted in 1789–90 along the lines of the U.S. Constitution, was also primarily Wilson’s work and represented the climax of his 14-year fight against the constitution of 1776.

Wilson reached the peak of his career during the U.S. Constitutional Convention in 1787, where he was a key leader in both the debates and the drafting committee. That same year, despite facing strong opposition, he led the push for ratification in148 Pennsylvania, making it the second state to ratify. The new Commonwealth constitution, created between 1789 and 1790 based on the U.S. Constitution, was largely his work and marked the culmination of his 14-year struggle against the 1776 constitution.

For his services in the formation of the Federal Government, though Wilson expected to be appointed Chief Justice, in 1789 President Washington named him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. He was chosen that same year as the first law professor at the College of Philadelphia. Two years hence, he began an official digest of the laws of Pennsylvania, a project he never completed, though he carried on for awhile after funds ran out.

For his contributions to creating the Federal Government, even though Wilson hoped to be appointed Chief Justice, in 1789, President Washington appointed him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. That same year, he was selected as the first law professor at the College of Philadelphia. Two years later, he started an official summary of Pennsylvania's laws, a project he never finished, although he continued for a while after the funding ran out.

Wilson, who wrote only a few opinions, did not achieve the success on the Supreme Court that his capabilities and experience promised. Indeed, during those years he was the object of much criticism and barely escaped impeachment. For one thing, he tried to influence the enactment of legislation in Pennsylvania favorable to land speculators. Between 1792 and 1795 he also made huge but unwise land investments in western New York and Pennsylvania, as well as in Georgia. This did not stop him from conceiving a grandiose but ill-fated scheme, involving vast sums of European capital, for the recruitment of European colonists and their settlement on western lands. Meantime, in 1793, a widower with six children, he had remarried; the one son from this union died in infancy.

Wilson, who wrote only a few opinions, didn't achieve the success on the Supreme Court that his skills and experience promised. During those years, he faced a lot of criticism and narrowly avoided impeachment. For one thing, he tried to influence legislation in Pennsylvania that would benefit land speculators. Between 1792 and 1795, he also made significant but poor investments in land in western New York, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. This didn't stop him from coming up with a grand but doomed plan that involved large amounts of European capital to recruit European settlers to the western lands. Meanwhile, in 1793, as a widower with six children, he remarried; the one son from this marriage died in infancy.

Four years later, to avoid arrest for debt, the distraught Wilson moved from Philadelphia to Burlington, N.J. The next year, apparently while on Federal circuit court business, he arrived at Edenton, N.C., in a state of acute mental stress and was taken into the home of James Iredell, a fellow Supreme Court Justice. He died there within a few months. Although first buried at Hayes Plantation near Edenton, his remains were later reinterred in the yard of Christ Church at Philadelphia.

Four years later, to escape arrest for debt, the troubled Wilson moved from Philadelphia to Burlington, N.J. The following year, apparently while on Federal circuit court business, he arrived in Edenton, N.C., in a state of severe mental distress and was taken into the home of James Iredell, a fellow Supreme Court Justice. He died there within a few months. Although initially buried at Hayes Plantation near Edenton, his remains were later moved to the yard of Christ Church in Philadelphia.


149

149

John Witherspoon

NEW JERSEY

NEW JERSEY

Rev. John Witherspoon, the only active clergyman among the signers, achieved a greater reputation as a religious leader and educator than as a politician. Emigrating from Scotland to America in the midst of the controversy between the Colonies and the Crown, he took part in the Revolution, lost a son during the war, and signed the Articles of Confederation as well as the Declaration. He is better known, however, for his role in the growth of the Presbyterian Church and for his distinguished presidency of the College of New Jersey (later Princeton University).

Rev. John Witherspoon, the only clergyman actively involved among the signers, became better known as a religious leader and educator than as a politician. He relocated from Scotland to America during the conflict between the Colonies and the Crown, participated in the Revolution, lost a son in the war, and signed both the Articles of Confederation and the Declaration. However, he is best remembered for his role in the expansion of the Presbyterian Church and for his prominent presidency at the College of New Jersey (which eventually became Princeton University).

The son of a Calvinist minister, Witherspoon was born in 1723 at the village of Gifford, near Edinburgh. He attended grammar school at the neighboring town of Haddington and won master of arts (1739) and divinity (1743) degrees from the University of Edinburgh. In 1743 the Haddington Presbytery licensed him to preach. He was ordained 2 years later at Beith, where he occupied a pulpit until 1757. He then transferred to Paisley, not far from Glasgow. Meantime, in 1748, he had married; only five of his ten children survived childhood.

The son of a Calvinist minister, Witherspoon was born in 1723 in the village of Gifford, near Edinburgh. He attended grammar school in the nearby town of Haddington and earned his master of arts (1739) and divinity (1743) degrees from the University of Edinburgh. In 1743, the Haddington Presbytery licensed him to preach. He was ordained two years later at Beith, where he served as a pastor until 1757. He then moved to Paisley, not far from Glasgow. In the meantime, in 1748, he got married; only five of his ten children survived childhood.

Over the years, Witherspoon attained leadership of a group of conservative clergymen who were engaged in a prolonged struggle with a group of their colleagues to maintain the “purity” of orthodox Church doctrine. Witherspoon penned a stream of sermons and tracts attacking the opposition and denouncing moral decay in Scotland. He also defended the traditional prerogative of the people150 to choose their own ministers, a right ecclesiastical authorities had taken from them.

Over the years, Witherspoon became the leader of a group of conservative ministers who were in a long battle with some of their colleagues to preserve the "purity" of orthodox Church beliefs. Witherspoon wrote a series of sermons and pamphlets criticizing the opposition and condemning moral decline in Scotland. He also defended the traditional right of the people150 to select their own ministers, a right that church authorities had taken away from them.

In 1768 Witherspoon channeled his energies in a new direction. He gave up his post at Paisley and accepted the presidency of the College of New Jersey, after two representatives of the college had visited him and finally at the end of 2 years of effort overcome the objections of his wife. He sailed to America with his family. The college bloomed under his direction. He increased the endowment, instituted new methods of instruction, and broadened and revitalized the curriculum. Continuing also as a minister and church leader, he patched up a major schism in the Presbyterian Church; stimulated its expansion, especially in the Middle Colonies; and worked closely with the Congregationalists.

In 1768, Witherspoon redirected his focus. He left his position in Paisley and took the presidency of the College of New Jersey, after two college representatives visited him and finally, after two years of effort, convinced his wife. He sailed to America with his family. The college thrived under his leadership. He increased the endowment, introduced new teaching methods, and expanded and revitalized the curriculum. While continuing as a minister and church leader, he mended a significant split in the Presbyterian Church, encouraged its growth, particularly in the Middle Colonies, and collaborated closely with the Congregationalists.

The College of New Jersey (later Princeton University) in 1764. Rev. John Witherspoon served as its president from 1768 until 1794. The main building, Nassau Hall, is on the left; the President’s House, on the right.

The Revolution fanned Witherspoon’s hatred of the English, which had originated in Scotland. By 1770 his students were openly demonstrating in favor of the patriot cause. In a commencement oration he advocated resistance to the Crown, which became his favorite theme in sermons and essays. In 1774–76 he represented his county in the New Jersey provincial assemblies, and sat on local committees of correspondence. In the latter year he figured prominently in the agitations that led to the removal from office and imprisonment of151 the Royal Governor, and then received an appointment to the Continental Congress.

The Revolution intensified Witherspoon’s animosity toward the English, which had started in Scotland. By 1770, his students were openly supporting the patriot cause. In a commencement speech, he advocated for resistance against the Crown, a theme that became central to his sermons and essays. From 1774 to 1776, he represented his county in the New Jersey provincial assemblies and served on local committees of correspondence. In 1776, he played a key role in the movements that resulted in the dismissal and imprisonment of the Royal Governor, after which he was appointed to the Continental Congress.

On July 2, 1776, in a congressional speech urging independence, Witherspoon declared that the Colonies were “not only ripe for the measure but in danger of rotting for the want of it.” In November, when the British invaded New Jersey, he closed the College of New Jersey. The redcoats occupied its major building, Nassau Hall, burned the library, and committed other acts of destruction. The next year, Witherspoon’s son James lost his life at the Battle of Germantown, Pa.

On July 2, 1776, in a speech to Congress advocating for independence, Witherspoon stated that the Colonies were "not only ready for this action but at risk of suffering for the lack of it." In November, when the British invaded New Jersey, he shut down the College of New Jersey. The British troops took over its main building, Nassau Hall, burned the library, and carried out other acts of destruction. The following year, Witherspoon's son James died at the Battle of Germantown, Pennsylvania.

Witherspoon stayed in Congress until 1782. His main committee assignments dealt with military and foreign affairs. He also participated in the debates on the Articles of Confederation, aided in setting up the executive departments, and argued for financial stability. Meantime, in 1779, he had moved from the President’s House at Princeton to Tusculum, a country home he had earlier built nearby. He left the Rev. Samuel S. Smith, his son-in-law and the college vice president, in charge of the nearly defunct institution.

Witherspoon stayed in Congress until 1782. His main committee assignments were focused on military and foreign affairs. He also took part in the discussions about the Articles of Confederation, helped establish the executive departments, and advocated for financial stability. Meanwhile, in 1779, he moved from the President’s House at Princeton to Tusculum, a country home he had previously built nearby. He left Rev. Samuel S. Smith, his son-in-law and the college vice president, in charge of the nearly defunct institution.

Witherspoon devoted most of his effort during the postwar years to rebuilding the college, which never fully recovered its prewar prosperity during his lifetime. In addition, during the years 1783–89 he sat for two terms in the State legislature, attended the New Jersey (1787) convention that ratified the Federal Constitution, participated in the reorganization of the Presbyterian Church, and moderated its first general assembly (1789). In 1791, at the age of 68, Witherspoon took a second wife, a 24-year-old widow, who bore him two daughters. Blind his last 2 years, he died in 1794, aged 71, at Tusculum. His remains rest in the Presidents’ Lot at Princeton Cemetery.

Witherspoon focused most of his efforts during the postwar years on rebuilding the college, which never fully regained its prewar success during his lifetime. Additionally, from 1783 to 1789, he served two terms in the State legislature, attended the New Jersey convention in 1787 that ratified the Federal Constitution, took part in reorganizing the Presbyterian Church, and moderated its first general assembly in 1789. In 1791, at the age of 68, Witherspoon married a 24-year-old widow, who gave birth to two daughters. He was blind in his final two years and passed away in 1794 at the age of 71 at Tusculum. His remains are interred in the Presidents’ Lot at Princeton Cemetery.


152

152

Oliver Wolcott

CONNECTICUT

CONNECTICUT

Oliver Wolcott, as much a soldier as a politician, helped convert the concept of independence into reality on the battlefield. He also occupied many local, provincial, and State offices, including the governorship. One of his five children, Oliver, also held that position and became U.S. Secretary of the Treasury.

Oliver Wolcott was both a soldier and a politician, playing a crucial role in making the idea of independence a reality on the battlefield. He held several local, provincial, and state positions, including governor. One of his five children, also named Oliver, served as governor and later became the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury.

Wolcott was the youngest son in a family of 15. Sired by Roger Wolcott, a leading Connecticut politician, he was born in 1726 at Windsor (present South Windsor), Conn. In 1747, just graduated from Yale College at the top of his class, he began his military career. As a militia captain during King George’s War (1740–48), he accompanied an unsuccessful British expedition against the French in New France. Back home, he studied medicine for a time with his brother before deciding to turn to law.

Wolcott was the youngest son in a family of 15. He was the son of Roger Wolcott, a prominent Connecticut politician, and was born in 1726 in Windsor (now South Windsor), Connecticut. In 1747, after graduating at the top of his class from Yale College, he started his military career. As a militia captain during King George’s War (1740–48), he took part in an unsuccessful British expedition against the French in New France. After returning home, he studied medicine for a while with his brother before deciding to pursue a career in law.

In 1751, when Litchfield County was organized, Wolcott moved about 30 miles westward to the town of Litchfield and immediately took over the first of a long string of county and State offices: county sheriff (1751–71); member of the lower house (1764, 1767–68, and 1770) and upper house (1771–86) of the colonial and State legislatures; and probate (1772–81) and county (1774–78) judge. By 1774 he had risen to the rank of colonel in the militia.

In 1751, when Litchfield County was established, Wolcott moved about 30 miles west to the town of Litchfield and immediately began a long career in various county and state positions: county sheriff (1751–71); member of the lower house (1764, 1767–68, and 1770) and upper house (1771–86) of the colonial and state legislatures; and probate (1772–81) and county (1774–78) judge. By 1774, he had achieved the rank of colonel in the militia.

The next spring, the legislature named him as a commissary for Connecticut troops and in the summer the Continental Congress designated him as a commissioner of Indian affairs for the northern153 department. In that capacity he attended a conference that year with the Iroquois (Six Nations) at Albany, N.Y., that temporarily gained their neutrality in the war. Before the year was out, he also aided in arbitrating land disputes between Pennsylvania and Connecticut and New York and Vermont.

The following spring, the legislature appointed him as a supply officer for the Connecticut troops, and in the summer, the Continental Congress named him a commissioner for Indian affairs in the northern153 department. In that role, he participated in a conference that year with the Iroquois (Six Nations) in Albany, N.Y., which temporarily secured their neutrality in the war. Before the year ended, he also helped settle land disputes between Pennsylvania and Connecticut and between New York and Vermont.

Wolcott sat in Congress from 1775 until 1783 except for the year 1779. In June 1776 illness caused him to return to Connecticut. Absent at the time of the voting for independence the next month and at the formal signing of the Declaration in August, he added his signature sometime after his return to Congress in October. Throughout his tour, Wolcott devoted portions of each year to militia duty, highlighted by participation as a brigadier general in the New York campaigns of 1776–77 that culminated in the surrender of Gen. John Burgoyne in October of the latter year at Saratoga (Schuylerville). During 1779, as a major general, Wolcott defended the Connecticut seacoast against the raids of William Tryon, Royal Governor of New York.

Wolcott served in Congress from 1775 to 1783, except for 1779. In June 1776, he became ill and had to return to Connecticut. He was absent during the vote for independence the following month and at the official signing of the Declaration in August, but he added his signature after returning to Congress in October. Throughout his time in office, Wolcott also spent parts of each year on militia duty, notably serving as a brigadier general in the New York campaigns of 1776–77, which ended with the surrender of General John Burgoyne in October of that year at Saratoga (Schuylerville). In 1779, as a major general, Wolcott defended the Connecticut coastline against raids by William Tryon, the Royal Governor of New York.

Wolcott’s postwar career was varied. On the national level, he helped negotiate two Indian treaties: the Second Treaty of Fort Stanwix, N.Y. (1784), in which the Iroquois ceded to the United States some of their lands in New York and Pennsylvania; and another (1789) with the Wyandottes, who gave up their tract in the Western Reserve, in present Ohio. On the State level, Wolcott continued his long period of service in the upper house of the legislature (ended 1786); enjoyed a lengthy stint as Lieutenant Governor (1787–96); attended the convention (1788) that ratified the U.S. Constitution; and, like his father before him and his son after him, held the office of Governor (1796–97).

Wolcott’s postwar career was diverse. Nationally, he helped negotiate two Indian treaties: the Second Treaty of Fort Stanwix, N.Y. (1784), where the Iroquois ceded some of their lands in New York and Pennsylvania to the United States; and another one (1789) with the Wyandottes, who surrendered their land in the Western Reserve, now part of Ohio. At the state level, Wolcott continued his long service in the upper house of the legislature (which ended in 1786); had a lengthy term as Lieutenant Governor (1787–96); participated in the convention (1788) that ratified the U.S. Constitution; and, like his father before him and his son after him, served as Governor (1796–97).

While occupying the latter position, Wolcott died, aged 71, at East Windsor. His remains rest in the East Cemetery at Litchfield.

While in that position, Wolcott passed away at the age of 71 in East Windsor. His remains are buried in the East Cemetery in Litchfield.


154

154

George Wythe

VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA

Virginia’s George Wythe spent only about a year in the Continental Congress, never aspired to any other national office, and played a minor part in the Constitutional Convention. But he made a deep impress on legal education in the Nation and strongly influenced the government and jurisprudence of his State. A brilliant classical scholar and the first professor of law in an American college, he instructed scores of young lawyers. Included among them were Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe, John Marshall, and Henry Clay.

George Wythe from Virginia served about a year in the Continental Congress, didn't seek any other national position, and played a minor role in the Constitutional Convention. Nevertheless, he made a significant impact on legal education in the country and greatly influenced the government and legal system of his state. A brilliant classical scholar and the first law professor at an American college, he taught many young lawyers, including Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe, John Marshall, and Henry Clay.

Wythe was born in 1726, the second of three children, on his father’s plantation on the Back River in Elizabeth City County, Va., within the confines of present Hampton. He lost his parents at an early age and grew up under the guardianship of his older brother, Thomas. George acquired a knowledge of the classics from his well-educated mother before her death, and he probably attended for a time a grammar school operated by the College of William and Mary.

Wythe was born in 1726 as the second of three children on his father's plantation along the Back River in Elizabeth City County, Virginia, which is now part of Hampton. He lost his parents when he was young and was raised by his older brother, Thomas. George learned about classical literature from his educated mother before she passed away, and he likely attended a grammar school run by the College of William and Mary for a while.

Wythe’s brother later sent him to Prince George County to read law under an uncle. In 1746, at the age of 20, he joined the bar, moved to Spotsylvania County, and became associated with a lawyer there. In December 1747, he married his partner’s sister, but she succumbed the next year. In 1754 Lt. Gov. Robert Dinwiddie appointed him as acting colonial attorney general, a position he held for a few months and which likely required that he spend some time in Williamsburg. The next year, Wythe’s brother died and he inherited his birthplace. He chose, however, to live in Williamsburg in the house that his new father-in-law, an architect, designed and155 built for him and his betrothed, whom he married about 1755. Their only child died in infancy.

Wythe's brother later sent him to Prince George County to study law with an uncle. In 1746, at the age of 20, he became a lawyer, moved to Spotsylvania County, and teamed up with a lawyer there. In December 1747, he married his partner's sister, but she passed away the following year. In 1754, Lt. Gov. Robert Dinwiddie appointed him as acting colonial attorney general, a position he held for a few months, which likely required him to spend some time in Williamsburg. The next year, Wythe's brother died, and he inherited his birthplace. However, he decided to live in Williamsburg in the house that his new father-in-law, an architect, designed and built for him and his fiancée, whom he married around 1755. Their only child died in infancy.

At Williamsburg, Wythe immersed himself in further study of the classics and the law and achieved accreditation by the colonial Supreme Court. Like his father, he served in the House of Burgesses (mid-1750’s until 1775), first as delegate and after 1769 as clerk. During this period, in 1768 he held the mayorship of Williamsburg, and the next year sat on the board of visitors of the College of William and Mary. He also had found time during the years 1762–67 to train youthful Thomas Jefferson in the law. The two men, at first as mentor and pupil and later as political allies, maintained a lifetime friendship.

At Williamsburg, Wythe dove deeper into the study of the classics and the law, earning accreditation from the colonial Supreme Court. Like his father, he served in the House of Burgesses from the mid-1750s until 1775, initially as a delegate and then as clerk after 1769. During this time, in 1768, he was the mayor of Williamsburg, and the following year, he served on the board of visitors for the College of William and Mary. He also managed to find time between 1762 and 1767 to teach a young Thomas Jefferson about the law. The two began as mentor and student and later became political allies, maintaining a lifelong friendship.

Wythe first exhibited Revolutionary leanings in 1764 when Parliament hinted to the Colonies that it might impose a Stamp Tax. By then an experienced legislator, he drafted for the House of Burgesses a remonstrance to Parliament so strident that his fellow legislators modified it before adoption. Wythe was one of the first to express the concept of separate nationhood for the Colonies within the British Empire.

Wythe first showed his Revolutionary ideas in 1764 when Parliament suggested to the Colonies that they might impose a Stamp Tax. By then a seasoned legislator, he wrote a strong protest for the House of Burgesses to send to Parliament, which his fellow lawmakers toned down before it was approved. Wythe was one of the first to articulate the idea of the Colonies having separate nationhood within the British Empire.

Although elected to Congress in 1775–76, Wythe exerted little influence in that body. He spent considerable time helping draft a State constitution and design a State seal, and was not present at the time of the formal signing of the Declaration in August 1776. Furthermore, within a few months, Wythe, Jefferson, and Edmund Pendleton undertook a 3-year project to revise Virginia’s legal code. In 1777 Wythe also presided as speaker of the lower house of the legislature.

Although he was elected to Congress in 1775–76, Wythe didn't have much influence there. He spent a lot of time helping to draft a state constitution and design a state seal, and he wasn't present for the formal signing of the Declaration in August 1776. Additionally, within a few months, Wythe, Jefferson, and Edmund Pendleton began a 3-year project to revise Virginia's legal code. In 1777, Wythe also served as the speaker of the lower house of the legislature.

An appointment as one of the three judges of the newly created Virginia high court of chancery followed the next year. Sitting on it for 28 years, during 13 of which he was the only chancellor, Wythe charted the course of Virginia jurisprudence. In conjunction with these duties, he was an ex officio member of the State Superior Court.

An appointment as one of the three judges of the newly established Virginia High Court of Chancery came the following year. Serving for 28 years, during which he was the only chancellor for 13 years, Wythe shaped the direction of Virginia law. In addition to these responsibilities, he was also an ex officio member of the State Superior Court.

Wythe’s real love was teaching. In 1779 Jefferson and other officials of the College of William and Mary created the first chair of law in a U.S. institution of higher learning and appointed Wythe to fill it. In that position, he educated America’s earliest college-trained lawyers, among them John Marshall and James Monroe. To supplement his lectures, Wythe introduced the use of moot156 courts and legislatures, in which students could put their knowledge into actual practice. In 1787 he also demonstrated his love of the classics and literature by offering free to anyone interested a class in Latin, Greek, and English literature. That same year, he attended the U.S. Constitutional Convention, but played an insignificant role and did not sign the Constitution. The following year, however, he was one of the Federalist leaders at the Virginia ratifying convention.

Wythe's true passion was teaching. In 1779, Jefferson and other officials from the College of William and Mary established the first chair of law at a U.S. institution of higher education and appointed Wythe to that position. There, he trained some of America's earliest college-educated lawyers, including John Marshall and James Monroe. To enhance his lectures, Wythe implemented moot courts and legislatures, where students could apply their knowledge in real-world scenarios. In 1787, he also showcased his love for the classics and literature by offering a free class in Latin, Greek, and English literature to anyone interested. That same year, he attended the U.S. Constitutional Convention, although he played a minor role and did not sign the Constitution. The following year, however, he became one of the Federalist leaders at the Virginia ratifying convention.

In 1791, the year after Wythe resigned his professorship, his chancery duties caused him to move his home to Richmond, the State capital. But he was reluctant to give up his teaching and opened a private law school. One of his last and most promising pupils was a teenager named Henry Clay.

In 1791, the year after Wythe stepped down from his teaching position, his chancery responsibilities required him to relocate to Richmond, the state capital. However, he was hesitant to stop teaching and decided to open a private law school. One of his final and most promising students was a teenager named Henry Clay.

In 1806, in his eighth decade, Wythe died at Richmond under mysterious circumstances—probably of poison administered by his heir, a favorite grandnephew. Reflecting a lifelong aversion to slavery, Wythe emancipated his slaves in his will. His grave is in the yard of St. John’s Episcopal Church at Richmond.

In 1806, at the age of nearly 80, Wythe died in Richmond under mysterious circumstances—likely from poison given to him by his favored grandnephew. Showing his lifelong opposition to slavery, Wythe freed his slaves in his will. His grave is located in the yard of St. John’s Episcopal Church in Richmond.


157

157

Part Three
Signers of the Declaration:
Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings

159

159

Over the decades that separate present-day America from the early periods of its history, a large number of the structures commemorating those periods have been marred or obliterated. Those relating to the signers of the Declaration of Independence have not been spared. The ravages of war, urbanization, fire, aging, weathering, neglect, and vandalism have destroyed all the residences of 21 of these 56 men and seriously impaired some of those that have survived.

Over the decades that separate today's America from its early history, many of the buildings honoring those times have been damaged or destroyed. Those connected to the signers of the Declaration of Independence haven't been exempt. The impacts of war, urban development, fire, aging, weather, neglect, and vandalism have led to the loss of all the homes of 21 out of these 56 men and have seriously affected some of the ones that are still standing.

Beyond those factors detrimental to all historic buildings are two special ones that have hampered the marking and preserving of signers’ homes and other sites. For decades following adoption of the Declaration, these individuals were not accorded the reverence bestowed on them in modern times. Secondly, many of them have received only slight historical recognition because they lacked national reputations other than as signers.

Beyond the factors that harm all historic buildings, there are two specific issues that have hindered the marking and preservation of the homes and sites of the signers. For decades after the Declaration was adopted, these individuals were not treated with the respect they receive today. Additionally, many of them have received only minimal historical recognition because they did not have national reputations beyond being signers.

Yet among the residences and buildings that remain are many of major significance. As a whole, they reveal much about the way of life of the signers and illuminate the events involved in the creation of the Declaration. Of outstanding significance is Independence National Historical Park, Pa. Within its boundaries the document was written, debated, approved, and signed. The National160 Park Service administers the park in cooperation with the city of Philadelphia and various private agencies. Three residences of signers are also units of the National Park System: Adams National Historic Site, Mass.; the Floyd House, in Fire Island National Seashore, N.Y.; and the Nelson House, part of Colonial National Historical Park, Va.

Yet among the homes and buildings that are still standing, many hold significant importance. Collectively, they provide insight into the lives of the signers and shed light on the events surrounding the creation of the Declaration. A key highlight is Independence National Historical Park in Pennsylvania. This is where the document was written, discussed, approved, and signed. The National160 Park Service manages the park in partnership with the city of Philadelphia and various private organizations. Three residences of signers are also part of the National Park System: Adams National Historic Site in Massachusetts; the Floyd House at Fire Island National Seashore in New York; and the Nelson House, which is part of Colonial National Historical Park in Virginia.

Almost half the extant homes of the signers are owned by private individuals, many of whom personally reside in them and a few of whom are descendants of the signers. The rest of the residences are owned and maintained by States, cities, and a wide variety of nongovernmental institutions, such as patriotic-civic organizations, memorial associations, local historical societies, foundations, universities, churches, and corporations and business firms.

Almost half of the existing homes of the signers are owned by private individuals, many of whom live in them and a few of whom are descendants of the signers. The rest of the homes are owned and maintained by states, cities, and a variety of nonprofit organizations, such as patriotic and civic groups, memorial associations, local historical societies, foundations, universities, churches, and businesses.

Reflecting the dedicated efforts of many of the above individuals and agencies, a considerable number of the buildings and residences provide fine examples of historic preservation and restoration. Unfortunately, some structures have badly deteriorated. But the increased recent interest in the signers has enhanced the identification, renovation, and preservation of pertinent sites and buildings.

Reflecting the hard work of many individuals and organizations mentioned above, a good number of the buildings and homes showcase excellent examples of historic preservation and restoration. Unfortunately, some structures have significantly fallen into disrepair. However, the recent surge in interest in the signers has improved the identification, renovation, and preservation of related sites and buildings.

In addition to the preservation of sites and buildings, the subject of this book, the signers have been honored in many other ways. Commemoration varies widely, however, from State to State and from signer to signer. Some have been recognized in a major way; others hardly at all.

In addition to preserving sites and buildings, which is the focus of this book, the signers have been honored in various other ways. However, the nature of these commemorations differs significantly from one state to another and from one signer to another. Some have received substantial recognition, while others have barely been acknowledged.

In the forefront of the groups that have marked extant homes and buildings, as well as the sites of former structures and graves, or otherwise memorialized the signers are: Daughters of the American Revolution; Daughters of the Revolution; Colonial Dames of America; National Society of Colonial Dames of America; Sons of the American Revolution; Sons of the Revolution; and the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, Inc., chartered by Congress in 1907.

In the forefront of the organizations that have recognized existing homes and buildings, as well as the locations of former structures and graves, or otherwise honored the signers are: Daughters of the American Revolution; Daughters of the Revolution; Colonial Dames of America; National Society of Colonial Dames of America; Sons of the American Revolution; Sons of the Revolution; and the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, Inc., chartered by Congress in 1907.

A major share of the sites of residences with no physical remains has been marked. The 20 signers for whom no existing homes have been located are: Samuel Adams, Abraham Clark, William Ellery, Benjamin Franklin, Lyman Hall, John Hart, Francis Lewis, Philip Livingston, Thomas McKean, Lewis Morris, Robert Morris, John Morton, Robert Treat Paine, John Penn, George Read, Caesar Rodney, George Ross, Benjamin Rush, Roger Sherman, and James161 Smith. Another signer, Samuel Chase, is represented in this volume only by a structure (Chase-Lloyd House) that he began building but never resided in.

A significant number of residential sites without any physical remains have been identified. The 20 signers for whom no existing homes have been found are: Samuel Adams, Abraham Clark, William Ellery, Benjamin Franklin, Lyman Hall, John Hart, Francis Lewis, Philip Livingston, Thomas McKean, Lewis Morris, Robert Morris, John Morton, Robert Treat Paine, John Penn, George Read, Caesar Rodney, George Ross, Benjamin Rush, Roger Sherman, and James161 Smith. Another signer, Samuel Chase, is only represented in this volume by a building (Chase-Lloyd House) that he started constructing but never lived in.

Monuments and memorials range from simple plaques to the Thomas Jefferson Memorial, D.C., in the National Park System. Statues of several signers are located in the U.S. Capitol. Special monuments have been erected to those from two States. The Founders’ Monument, in Augusta, Ga., is dedicated to the three signers from that State (Gwinnett, Hall, and Walton) and contains the burial places of the latter two. A monument to the three North Carolina signers (Hewes, Hooper, and Penn) at Guilford Courthouse National Military Park, in Greensboro, N.C., includes the tombs of Hooper and Penn.

Monuments and memorials come in various forms, from simple plaques to the Thomas Jefferson Memorial in Washington, D.C., which is part of the National Park System. Statues of several signers are found in the U.S. Capitol. Special monuments have been built for individuals from two states. The Founders’ Monument in Augusta, Georgia, is dedicated to the three signers from that state (Gwinnett, Hall, and Walton) and includes the burial sites of Hall and Walton. A monument honoring the three signers from North Carolina (Hewes, Hooper, and Penn) is located at Guilford Courthouse National Military Park in Greensboro, North Carolina, and contains the tombs of Hooper and Penn.

Described in the following pages are the principal buildings associated with the signers of the Declaration. They are comprised of three categories: National Park Service Areas, National Historic Landmarks, and Other Sites Considered.

Described in the following pages are the main buildings connected to the signers of the Declaration. They fall into three categories: National Park Service Areas, National Historic Landmarks, and Other Sites Considered.

The principal aim of the National Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings is to identify nationally important sites that are not National Park Service Areas, but no survey of historic places would be complete without including them. This is particularly true because many of them were designated as National Historic Landmarks before they became part of the National Park System. Further information about a particular area may be obtained by writing directly to the park superintendent at the address listed immediately following the location.

The main goal of the National Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings is to identify sites that are nationally important but aren't National Park Service Areas. However, no survey of historic places would be complete without including these sites. This is especially true since many were named National Historic Landmarks before joining the National Park System. For more details about a specific area, you can write directly to the park superintendent at the address provided right after the location.

National Historic Landmarks are those sites judged by the Advisory Board on National Parks, Historic Sites, Buildings, and Monuments to meet the criteria of national significance in commemorating the history of the United States (pp. 270–271). They have been declared by the Secretary of the Interior to be eligible for designation as National Historic Landmarks. Final designation occurs when the owners apply for such status. They receive certificates and bronze plaques attesting to the distinction.

National Historic Landmarks are sites that the Advisory Board on National Parks, Historic Sites, Buildings, and Monuments has determined meet the standards for national significance in honoring the history of the United States (pp. 270–271). The Secretary of the Interior has declared them eligible for designation as National Historic Landmarks. Final designation happens when the owners apply for this status. They receive certificates and bronze plaques recognizing this distinction.

Other Sites Considered consist of those sites deemed by the Advisory Board to possess noteworthy historical value but not national significance. The list of sites included in this category does not162 purport to be exhaustive; it is merely a representative sampling, all that is possible because of space limitations.

Other Sites Considered include those locations identified by the Advisory Board as having notable historical value, but without national significance. The list of sites in this category does not162 claim to be exhaustive; it is just a representative sample, limited by space constraints.

Many sites in the Other Sites Considered category in all phases of history are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, maintained by the National Park Service’s Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation. The register consists not only of sites in the National Park System and National Historic Landmarks but also those of State and local significance, nominated through appropriate channels by the various States. It is published biennally and distributed by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402. The latest volume is The National Register of Historic Places, 1972, price $7.80.

Many places in the Other Sites Considered category throughout history are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, maintained by the National Park Service’s Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation. The register includes not only sites in the National Park System and National Historic Landmarks but also those of state and local importance, nominated through the proper channels by various states. It is published every two years and distributed by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402. The latest volume is The National Register of Historic Places, 1972, priced at $7.80.

(map)

SIGNERS OF THE DECLARATION

SIGNERS OF THE DECLARATION

HISTORIC SITES OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE

National Historic Sites

163 For the convenience of users of this volume, sites and buildings are listed alphabetically by State. The following code indicates site categories:

163 For the convenience of users of this volume, locations and buildings are listed in alphabetical order by State. The following code shows the categories of sites:

Site Categories

☑  NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AREAS
∆   NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS
‎⊗  OTHER SITES CONSIDERED

Website Categories

☑  NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AREAS
∆   NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS
‎⊗  OTHER SITES CONSIDERED

NOTE: The following descriptions indicate sites that are open to the public. Before visiting any of them, inquiry should be made to the owners or custodians concerning dates and hours of access and admission costs, usually nominal. Special permission should be obtained to visit privately owned sites.

NOTE: The following descriptions indicate places that are open to the public. Before visiting any of them, you should check with the owners or custodians about the dates and hours of access and any admission fees, which are usually minimal. You should get special permission to visit privately owned sites.


164

164

Huntington Birthplace, Connecticut  ∆

Location: Windham County, on the north side of Conn. 14, about 2 blocks west of its junction with Conn. 97, Scotland.

Location: Windham County, north side of Conn. 14, approximately 2 blocks west of its intersection with Conn. 97, Scotland.

This plain but charming farmhouse on the bank of Merrick’s Brook was the birthplace and home of Samuel Huntington through his boyhood and early manhood. He lived in it from 1731 probably until 1760, the year he moved to Norwich.

This simple yet charming farmhouse by Merrick’s Brook was the birthplace and home of Samuel Huntington during his childhood and early adulthood. He lived here from 1731 until around 1760, the year he relocated to Norwich.

The house, built in the period 1700–22, is shaded by huge trees and fronted by a spacious lawn. It is a large, two-story, clapboarded-frame structure of saltbox design. The gable roof slopes steeply at the rear. Exterior windows are topped by projecting cornices; the center door, by a rectangular transom. A one-story kitchen wing with front porch at the northeast end of the house along the main axis was added early in the 19th century.

The house, built between 1700 and 1722, is surrounded by large trees and has a spacious lawn in front. It’s a big, two-story, clapboard-frame structure with a saltbox design. The gable roof has a steep slope at the back. The exterior windows have projecting cornices above them, and the center door features a rectangular transom. A one-story kitchen wing with a front porch was added early in the 19th century at the northeast end of the house along the main axis.

Huntington Birthplace.

The floor plan is typical of a central chimney New England dwelling. Behind a short central entrance hall, which contains an L-shaped stairway, is a large stone central chimney with three fireplaces. Two of these heat the parlor and dining room, entered from the hall; a huge third one serves the large original kitchen, which ranges across the rear two-thirds of the house behind the dining room and chimney.165 A small bedroom is situated back of the parlor alongside the original kitchen, between it and the one-story new kitchen addition. Three additional bedrooms, one of which has a fully paneled fireplace wall, are located upstairs. Wallpaper has been added to some of the rooms, but the fireplaces, wainscoting, and wide-board floors are original.

The floor plan is typical of a central chimney New England house. Behind a short central entrance hall, which features an L-shaped staircase, is a large stone central chimney with three fireplaces. Two of these heat the parlor and dining room, which are accessed from the hall; a massive third one serves the spacious original kitchen, which spans the rear two-thirds of the house behind the dining room and chimney.165 A small bedroom is located behind the parlor next to the original kitchen, nestled between it and the new one-story kitchen addition. Three more bedrooms, one of which has a fully paneled fireplace wall, are found upstairs. Wallpaper has been added to some rooms, but the fireplaces, wainscoting, and wide-board floors remain original.

The privately owned house, which is in good condition and little altered, has never been restored, though some modern conveniences have been installed. It is not open to the public.

The privately owned house, which is in good shape and mostly unchanged, has never been renovated, although some modern conveniences have been added. It is not open to the public.


Huntington House, Connecticut  ‎⊗

Location: New London County, 34 East Town Street, Norwich.

Location: New London County, 34 East Town Street, Norwich.

Samuel Huntington erected this house in the years 1783–85 and lived in it until his death in 1796. Since that time, the frame dwelling has been extensively modified on both the exterior and interior and a major addition made at the rear.

Samuel Huntington built this house between 1783 and 1785 and lived in it until he died in 1796. Since then, the wooden structure has been significantly changed on both the outside and inside, and a large addition has been added at the back.

Huntington House.

Originally the residence was a large, two-story, rectangular structure with a gable roof, two interior chimneys, tall corner pilasters, and triangular pediments above the first-story windows. By the166 middle of the 19th century, however, the structure had been remodeled in Greek Revival style, including the construction of a two-story portico across the entire front, or north, side, and in the center of this facade a central two-tiered porch. Later in the century, the portico and the two interior chimneys were removed. Sometime during the century, a large two-story section was added to the rear of the house, and a projecting two-story bay on the west side.

Originally, the residence was a large, two-story rectangular building with a gable roof, two interior chimneys, tall corner pilasters, and triangular pediments above the ground-floor windows. By the166mid-19th century, however, the building had been remodeled in Greek Revival style, which included adding a two-story portico across the entire front or north side, along with a central two-tiered porch in the middle of this facade. Later in the century, the portico and the two interior chimneys were removed. At some point during the century, a large two-story section was added to the back of the house, and a projecting two-story bay was added on the west side.

The present two-tiered porch at the entrance is a modern replacement whose design differs considerably from the earlier one. Four large Doric columns support it, and a railing runs around the second-story level. The east entranceway consists of a one-story portico with an elliptical plan and Doric columns. Other modern features include clapboarding and window sash.

The current two-level porch at the entrance is a modern update that looks quite different from the original. It is supported by four large Doric columns, and there's a railing around the second floor. The east entrance has a single-story portico with an elliptical shape and Doric columns. Other modern details include clapboard siding and window sashes.

The central hall, extending from the entranceway through the rest of the house and rear addition, has always dominated the floor plan, which otherwise has been completely obliterated. Interior partitions have either been removed to create larger rooms or added to make smaller ones. Stairs are located in the front and rear of the hall. Little, if any, of the original interior finish remains.

The central hall, stretching from the entrance all the way through the house and the back addition, has always been the main feature of the layout, which has otherwise been completely altered. Interior walls have either been taken down to create larger spaces or put up to form smaller ones. Stairs are positioned at both the front and back of the hall. Hardly any of the original interior finishes are left.

The house, also known as the Governor Huntington House, in excellent condition, is owned and occupied by a charitable organization and is not open to the general public. Huntington’s remains rest in the adjacent Old Burial Ground.

The house, also called the Governor Huntington House, is in great condition, owned and lived in by a charitable organization, and isn’t open to the public. Huntington’s remains are buried in the nearby Old Burial Ground.


Williams Birthplace, Connecticut  ‎⊗

Location: New London County, on the west side of Conn. 87 at the south end of the commons, Lebanon.

Location: New London County, on the west side of Conn. 87 at the southern end of the commons, Lebanon.

William Williams was born in this house in 1731 and lived in it until 1755, when his father gave him a residence elsewhere in Lebanon. Constructed about 1712 by Rev. Samuel Welles, a Congregational minister, it later came into the possession of Rev. Solomon Williams, the signer’s father, and is also known as the Welles-Williams House. Over the years, considerable alteration has occurred.

William Williams was born in this house in 1731 and lived here until 1755, when his father provided him with a place to stay elsewhere in Lebanon. Built around 1712 by Rev. Samuel Welles, a Congregational minister, it later became the property of Rev. Solomon Williams, the signer’s father, and is also called the Welles-Williams House. Over the years, it has undergone significant changes.

The rectangular frame structure is two stories high with a gable roof. Exterior louvered shutters flank the windows on both stories. The Greek Revival architrave of the central door was added about 1830. A one-story ell, containing a kitchen and part of the dining167 room, is located at the rear southwest corner of the house. A barn has been built on the end of the ell. A more recent one-story frame wing extends from the southeast rear corner. The residence was recently covered with clapboard.

The rectangular frame house is two stories tall with a gable roof. Shuttered windows on both floors are flanked by louvered shutters. The Greek Revival-style trim around the central door was added around 1830. At the back southwest corner of the house, there’s a one-story ell that includes a kitchen and part of the dining room. A barn has been built at the end of the ell. A newer one-story frame addition extends from the southeast rear corner. The house was recently covered with clapboard.

Williams Birthplace.

In modern times the original large central stone chimney has been replaced by a much smaller brick one, which provides a fireplace for the present living room. This has resulted in a major revamping of the typical central chimney floor plan. It once consisted of two tiers of four rooms but today is divided into large living room, dining room, and parlor, plus a bath, and three bedrooms upstairs. Two of the latter originally had fully paneled walls. Only one is paneled today.

In recent times, the original large central stone chimney has been replaced with a much smaller brick one, which now serves as a fireplace for the current living room. This change has led to a significant redesign of the typical central chimney floor plan. It used to have two levels consisting of four rooms, but now it's divided into a large living room, dining room, and parlor, along with a bathroom and three bedrooms upstairs. Two of the bedrooms originally had fully paneled walls, but now only one remains paneled.

The house, a private residence not accessible to the public, is in good condition.

The house, a private residence that's not open to the public, is in good shape.


168

168

Williams House, Connecticut  ∆

Location: New London County, southeast corner of the junction of Conn. 207 and Conn. 87, Lebanon.

Location: New London County, at the southeast corner of the intersection of Conn. 207 and Conn. 87, Lebanon.

Of the two extant residences of William Williams, this house, where he lived the greater part of his life, is less altered. His father, Rev. Solomon Williams, acquired it in 1748 and 7 years later presented it to William, who resided there until his death in 1811.

Of the two existing homes of William Williams, this house, where he lived most of his life, is the least changed. His father, Rev. Solomon Williams, bought it in 1748 and seven years later gave it to William, who lived there until his death in 1811.

The dwelling is a two-story, rectangular frame building. A long, 1½-story service wing extends from the center of the rear of the house. The original clapboard siding, covered with asbestos shingles in the 1930’s, has recently been reexposed. The front entranceway, in the Greek Revival style, was probably constructed about 1830. Other exterior changes to the main house are limited to the lowering of the two original interior chimneys on the back side of the ridge of the gabled roof, the addition of a brick chimney at the north end, and the insertion of a one-story bay window in the living room at the south end.

The house is a two-story, rectangular frame building. A long, 1½-story service wing extends from the center of the back of the house. The original clapboard siding, which was covered with asbestos shingles in the 1930s, has recently been uncovered. The front entrance, designed in the Greek Revival style, was likely built around 1830. Other changes to the main house are limited to lowering the two original interior chimneys on the back side of the gabled roof, adding a brick chimney at the north end, and putting in a one-story bay window in the living room at the south end.

Williams House.

The central hall divides each floor into two large rooms. Downstairs, to the north of the hall, which incorporates the original stairway, is a parlor, whose entire fireplace wall is still covered with the169 old paneling; to the south of the hall is the living room. Its entranceway from the hall has been widened and two columns inserted. Upstairs are two bedrooms with fully paneled fireplace walls. The six original fireplaces, except for the one in the kitchen, have been closed up, but their mantels have been left in place. All the original wide floorboards remain. The rear service wing contains a dining room and kitchen on the first floor and four small bedrooms above.

The central hall separates each floor into two large rooms. Downstairs, to the north of the hall, which includes the original staircase, is a parlor with a fireplace wall still covered in the old paneling; to the south of the hall is the living room. Its entrance from the hall has been widened and two columns added. Upstairs are two bedrooms with fully paneled fireplace walls. The six original fireplaces, except for the one in the kitchen, have been sealed, but their mantels are still in place. All the original wide floorboards are intact. The back service wing has a dining room and kitchen on the first floor and four small bedrooms above.

The well-preserved house is today a private home and is not open to the public.

The well-preserved house is now a private residence and isn't open to the public.


Wolcott House, Connecticut  ∆

Location: Litchfield County, on the east side of South Street nearly opposite its intersection with Wolcott Avenue, Litchfield.

Location: Litchfield County, on the east side of South Street almost directly across from its intersection with Wolcott Avenue, Litchfield.

Oliver Wolcott erected and occupied this residence in 1753, some 2 years after he moved from Windsor to Litchfield, and lived in it until he died in 1797. Except for a major rear addition, it has been only slightly altered.

Oliver Wolcott built and moved into this house in 1753, about 2 years after he relocated from Windsor to Litchfield, and lived there until he passed away in 1797. Aside from a significant addition at the back, it has been only minimally changed.

Wolcott House.

The two-story, frame structure has a gable roof, a large central chimney, and slight overhangs at the gable ends. Attached to the170 south end of the house on the main axis is a small, 1½-story frame wing with gambrel roof. A one-story porch, added by Wolcott about 1783, extends across this wing. The roof of the porch is of the coved, or “barrow,” type. The walls of the main house and wing are covered with clapboards, and the windows have louvered shutters. Triangular pediments cap the first-story windows. The center door, topped by a round arch fanlight, is sheltered by a Federal period broken-pediment portico supported by two fluted columns.

The two-story frame building has a gable roof, a large central chimney, and slight overhangs at the gable ends. Attached to the170 south end of the house on the main axis is a small, 1½-story frame wing with a gambrel roof. A one-story porch, added by Wolcott around 1783, extends across this wing. The porch roof is of the coved, or “barrow,” style. The walls of the main house and wing are covered with clapboards, and the windows have louvered shutters. Triangular pediments cap the first-story windows. The center door, topped by a round arch fanlight, is sheltered by a Federal period broken-pediment portico supported by two fluted columns.

Later additions include small bay windows on each side of the chimney in the south end wall of the south wing; a wide dormer in the west, or front, upper story of the wing; and a two-story, frame, clapboard-covered service wing, added in the 1880’s at the northeast corner on the rear of the main house, which gave the structure its present L-shape. The service wing, which cannot be seen from the street, contains the present kitchen and servants’ workrooms and bedrooms.

Later additions feature small bay windows on either side of the chimney in the south end wall of the south wing; a wide dormer in the west, or front, upper level of the wing; and a two-story, frame, clapboard-covered service wing, added in the 1880s at the northeast corner at the back of the main house, which gave the structure its current L-shape. The service wing, which is not visible from the street, includes the current kitchen as well as staff work areas and bedrooms.

The floor plan of the main house is the central chimney type. To the rear of the short central hall, which is equipped with the original L-shaped stairway and divides this portion of the house into two tiers of rooms, is the central chimney. On the first floor, to the north of the hall, is the dining room; to the south, the parlor. The fireplace walls in both rooms are fully paneled, and the floors have wide boards. Back of the parlor, a hall leads on the south to the morning room, or bedroom, in the south wing; and on the north, to the original kitchen, which contains a large fireplace. Four bedrooms occupy the second story of the main house, two of them featuring paneled overmantels, and one bedroom is located on the second floor of the south wing.

The floor plan of the main house follows a central chimney design. At the back of the short central hall, which features the original L-shaped staircase and divides this part of the house into two sections of rooms, is the central chimney. On the first floor, to the north of the hall is the dining room, and to the south is the parlor. The fireplace walls in both rooms are fully paneled, and the floors have wide planks. Behind the parlor, a hallway leads south to the morning room, or bedroom, in the south wing; and north to the original kitchen, which has a large fireplace. The second story of the main house has four bedrooms, two of which have paneled overmantels, and there is one bedroom located on the second floor of the south wing.

One of Wolcott’s descendants, who acquired and restored the house about 1920, resides in it today. In excellent condition, it is the oldest extant structure in Litchfield Historic District, a National Historic Landmark relating primarily to colonial architecture. The house is not accessible to the public.

One of Wolcott’s descendants, who bought and renovated the house around 1920, still lives in it today. In great shape, it’s the oldest building still standing in the Litchfield Historic District, a National Historic Landmark mainly focused on colonial architecture. The house isn't open to the public.


The White House, District of Columbia  ∆

Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington.

Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, D.C.

Signers John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were the first two occupants of the White House, official residence of our Nation’s171 Presidents since 1800. It is a national shrine that symbolizes the honor and dignity of the highest office in the land, and has been the scene of many historic events and brilliant social affairs. Like the Nation itself, it bears the influences of successive Chief Executives. Although rebuilt and modernized, it retains the simplicity and charm of its original appearance.

Signers John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were the first two residents of the White House, the official home of our Nation’s171 Presidents since 1800. It is a national landmark that represents the honor and dignity of the highest office in the country and has hosted many historic events and impressive social gatherings. Like the Nation itself, it reflects the influences of successive Presidents. Although it has been rebuilt and modernized, it still keeps the simplicity and charm of its original look.

South facade of the White House.

President George Washington approved the plans for the White House, drawn by Irish-born James Hoban, winner of the prize competition. Maj. Pierre Charles L’Enfant, the French artist-engineer, located the mansion in his plan of the Federal City, in which it and the Capitol were the first public buildings erected. The cornerstone was laid on October 13, 1792. Workmen used light gray sandstone from the Aquia Creek Quarries, in Virginia, for the exterior walls. During the course of construction or soon thereafter, they apparently172 were painted white. The building was thus unofficially termed the “White House” from an early date, but for many years it was usually referred to as the “President’s House” or the “President’s Palace.”

President George Washington approved the plans for the White House, which were designed by Irish-born James Hoban, the winner of the competition. Major Pierre Charles L’Enfant, the French artist-engineer, placed the mansion in his layout of the Federal City, where it and the Capitol were the first public buildings constructed. The cornerstone was laid on October 13, 1792. Workers used light gray sandstone from the Aquia Creek Quarries in Virginia for the exterior walls. During or shortly after construction, they were apparently painted white. As a result, the building was informally called the “White House” from an early stage, but for many years, it was mostly referred to as the “President’s House” or the “President’s Palace.”

North facade of the White House in 1807.

In the Palladian style of architecture, the main facade resembles the Duke of Leinster’s mansion in Dublin. Hoban probably derived the details of other faces and the interior arrangement from other contemporary European mansions. He supervised the original construction; the rebuilding after the burning by British forces, in 1814; and the erection of the north and south porticoes, some years later. Over the course of time, however, various architects modified Hoban’s original plans, notably Benjamin H. Latrobe during and after the Jefferson administration.

In the Palladian style of architecture, the main facade looks like the Duke of Leinster’s mansion in Dublin. Hoban likely borrowed details for other facades and the interior layout from other contemporary European mansions. He oversaw the initial construction, the rebuilding after the fire set by British forces in 1814, and the construction of the north and south porticoes a few years later. Over time, though, various architects changed Hoban’s original designs, especially Benjamin H. Latrobe during and after the Jefferson administration.

President and Mrs. John Adams were the first occupants, in November 1800 when the Government moved from Philadelphia to Washington. The interior had not yet been completed, and Mrs. Adams used the unfinished East Room to dry the family wash. During Jefferson’s administration the east and west terraces, or173 pavilions, were built. Jefferson, who practiced democratic simplicity in his social life, opened the mansion each morning to all arrivals.

President and Mrs. John Adams were the first residents, in November 1800 when the Government moved from Philadelphia to Washington. The interior hadn't been finished yet, and Mrs. Adams used the incomplete East Room to dry the family's laundry. During Jefferson’s presidency, the east and west terraces, or 173 pavilions, were constructed. Jefferson, who embraced democratic simplicity in his social life, opened the mansion every morning to everyone who arrived.

During the War of 1812, British forces captured the city and set the torch to the White House, the Capitol, and other Government buildings in retaliation for the destruction by U.S. troops of some public buildings in Canada. Only the partially damaged exterior walls and interior brickwork of the White House remained in the spring of 1815 when reconstruction began. In 1817 the recently elected President, James Monroe, was able to occupy the structure. In 1824 builders erected the south portico; and in 1829, the large north portico over the entrance and driveway. The west wing, including the President’s oval office, was added during the first decade of the 20th century. The east wing was built in 1942.

During the War of 1812, British forces took over the city and burned the White House, the Capitol, and other government buildings in response to the destruction caused by U.S. troops to public buildings in Canada. By the spring of 1815, only the partially damaged exterior walls and interior brickwork of the White House were left when reconstruction started. In 1817, the newly elected President, James Monroe, was able to move into the building. In 1824, the builders added the south portico; and in 1829, they completed the large north portico over the entrance and driveway. The west wing, which includes the President’s Oval Office, was constructed during the first decade of the 20th century. The east wing was built in 1942.

Over the years, the White House proper has been extensively renovated and modernized on various occasions. The old sandstone walls have been retained, however. The aim has been to keep the historical atmosphere while providing a more livable home for the President and his family.

Over the years, the White House has undergone significant renovations and updates multiple times. However, the original sandstone walls have been preserved. The goal has been to maintain the historical charm while creating a more comfortable home for the President and their family.

Located on the first floor of the main building are the East Room, Green Room, Blue Room, Red Room, State Dining Room, and Family Dining Room. These richly furnished rooms are open to the public on a special schedule. The ground and second floors are restricted to the use of the presidential family and guests. On the ground floor are the Diplomatic Reception Room, Curator’s Office, Vermeil Room, China Room, and Library. The second floor contains the Lincoln Bedroom, Lincoln Sitting Room, Queens’ Bedroom (Rose Guest Room), Treaty Room, Yellow Oval Room, and Empire Guest Room. Neither of the wings, reserved for the President and his staff, are ordinarily accessible to the public.

Located on the first floor of the main building are the East Room, Green Room, Blue Room, Red Room, State Dining Room, and Family Dining Room. These beautifully furnished rooms are open to the public on a special schedule. The ground and second floors are restricted to the use of the presidential family and their guests. On the ground floor are the Diplomatic Reception Room, Curator’s Office, Vermeil Room, China Room, and Library. The second floor includes the Lincoln Bedroom, Lincoln Sitting Room, Queens’ Bedroom (Rose Guest Room), Treaty Room, Yellow Oval Room, and Empire Guest Room. Neither of the wings, reserved for the President and their staff, are usually open to the public.

The simple dignity of the White House is enhanced by the natural beauty of its informal but carefully landscaped grounds.

The straightforward elegance of the White House is complemented by the natural beauty of its casually yet thoughtfully designed grounds.


College Hill, Georgia  ∆

Location: Richmond County, 2216 Wrightsboro Road, Augusta.

Location: Richmond County, 2216 Wrightsboro Road, Augusta.

In 1795 George Walton built this house on the western outskirts of Augusta on land that had been granted him by the State of Georgia in 1787. He lived in it until his death in 1804.

In 1795, George Walton built this house on the western edge of Augusta on land that the State of Georgia had granted him in 1787. He lived there until his death in 1804.

174

174

College Hill.

The handsome, two-story, frame structure features weatherboarded and clapboarded walls, a gable roof, and a brick chimney at each end. Of special interest is the two-tiered veranda extending across the entire main facade. At its front and sides on both levels are a series of segmental arches supported by delicate square columns on high pedestals. The fine balustrade is composed of delicate, sheaf-like balusters. Central double doors are located on the front of both stories. The doors are framed by pilasters and sidelights and topped by segmental fanlights. The windows have exterior louvered shutters. A one-story kitchen, added in 1898, extends from the southwest rear corner of the house.

The attractive two-story frame building has weatherboarded and clapboarded walls, a gable roof, and a brick chimney on each end. Notably, there's a two-tiered veranda that spans the entire front facade. Both levels feature a series of rounded arches supported by slender square columns on tall pedestals. The elegant balustrade consists of delicate, sheaf-like balusters. Central double doors are positioned at the front of both stories. The doors are framed by pilasters and sidelights, topped with rounded fanlights. The windows have exterior louvered shutters. A one-story kitchen, added in 1898, extends from the southwest rear corner of the house.

The central hall, which contains a U-shaped stairway, divides the main section of the structure into two pairs of rooms. The larger front two are equipped with fireplaces and have original mantels decorated in the Adam style. Behind the main hall is a smaller rear hall. The hall walls are plastered, and the board walls of the principal rooms are covered with paper and wainscoting. Five bedrooms occupy the second floor. The original kitchen was situated in a separate building that is no longer extant.

The central hall, featuring a U-shaped staircase, splits the main part of the building into two sets of rooms. The larger front pair comes with fireplaces and has the original mantels styled in the Adam design. At the back of the main hall is a smaller rear hall. The hall walls are plastered, and the walls of the main rooms are covered with wallpaper and wainscoting. The second floor has five bedrooms. The original kitchen used to be in a separate building that no longer exists.

Known today as the Walton-Harper House, since 1885 College175 Hill has been owned by the Harper family, descendants of Walton. Little altered but never restored, it is a private residence and is not shown publicly.

Known today as the Walton-Harper House, since 1885 College175 Hill has been owned by the Harper family, who are descendants of Walton. It has changed little and has never been restored; it remains a private residence and is not open to the public.


Meadow Garden, Georgia  ‎⊗

Location: Richmond County, 1320 Nelson Street, Augusta.

Location: Richmond County, 1320 Nelson Street, Augusta.

About 1790 Gov. George Walton moved from Savannah to Augusta, then the capital. At that time, he built Meadow Garden cottage at the northern edge of the city, on confiscated Loyalist lands in his possession. He resided in it until 1795, the year he constructed and occupied a larger home, College Hill, just west of Augusta. He deeded Meadow Garden under trusteeship to Thomas Watkins, who later conveyed it to George Walton, Jr. Over the years, it has been doubled in size and otherwise altered.

About 1790, Governor George Walton moved from Savannah to Augusta, which was then the capital. During that time, he built Meadow Garden cottage at the northern edge of the city, on Loyalist lands that had been seized and were in his possession. He lived there until 1795, the year he built and moved into a larger house, College Hill, just west of Augusta. He transferred Meadow Garden under trusteeship to Thomas Watkins, who later passed it on to George Walton, Jr. Over the years, it has been expanded and changed in various ways.

Meadow Garden.

Meadow Garden was originally a modest 1½-story cottage of frame construction built over a high brick basement. The gable roof was pierced by two front dormers and an interior central chimney. Windows were located in the gable ends. An entrance door and hall were situated on the western bay of the south facade, which had176 three bays. Two rooms on the first floor opened off the east of the hall, and the basement contained two more finished rooms.

Meadow Garden was originally a simple 1½-story cottage made of wood, built over a high brick basement. The gable roof had two front dormers and a central chimney inside. Windows were positioned in the gable ends. The entrance door and hall were located on the western side of the south facade, which had176 three sections. Two rooms on the first floor were accessed from the east side of the hall, and the basement had two more finished rooms.

Sometime after 1800 the house was enlarged and converted into a central hall type by a major three-bay wide extension to the west of the side hall, which became the central hall. The gable roof of the original building was extended over the new portion, which was also equipped with an interior chimney. About 1903 a single dormer was added to the extension. The two first-floor rooms in the addition, which lacks a cellar, are about two steps lower than the two in the original structure. The second floor of the present house contains four bedrooms. A one-story porch, probably not original, extends across the front, or south, side. Its Doric columns rest on square pedestals and are linked by a light balustrade. About 1903 a one-story kitchen was added to the rear northwest corner of the house.

Sometime after 1800, the house was expanded and turned into a central hall layout with a significant three-bay extension to the west of the side hall, which became the central hall. The gable roof of the original building was extended over the new section, which also included an interior chimney. Around 1903, a single dormer was added to the extension. The two first-floor rooms in the addition, which doesn’t have a cellar, are about two steps lower than the two in the original structure. The second floor of the current house has four bedrooms. A one-story porch, likely not original, spans the front, or south, side. Its Doric columns sit on square pedestals and are connected by a light balustrade. Around 1903, a one-story kitchen was added to the rear northwest corner of the house.

Many interior features are intact, but the plaster walls are covered with paper. The southwest room, or library, located in the 1800 addition and restored in 1969, contains an excellent late Georgian mantel and overmantel. The building has been roofed with modern material.

Many interior features are still preserved, but the plaster walls are covered with wallpaper. The southwest room, or library, which is part of the 1800 addition and was restored in 1969, has a beautiful late Georgian mantel and overmantel. The building is now topped with modern roofing materials.

The National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution acquired the residence in 1900, and the following year opened it to visitors. In 1960 the National Society presented it to the State Society. It is currently operated as a historic house museum by the Augusta Chapter. A caretaker’s residence is located on the grounds.

The National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution acquired the house in 1900, and the next year opened it to visitors. In 1960, the National Society gave it to the State Society. It is now run as a historic house museum by the Augusta Chapter. A caretaker's residence is on the property.


Tabby Cottage, Georgia  ‎⊗

Location: Liberty County, on St. Catherines Island, which is located about 10 miles off the Georgia coast southeast of Midway between St. Catherines and Sapelo Sounds.

Location: Liberty County, on St. Catherines Island, approximately 10 miles off the Georgia coast, southeast of Midway between St. Catherines and Sapelo Sounds.

The original portion of this structure, today an eight-bedroom house and the main building on St. Catherines Island, may have been built by Button Gwinnett in 1765 when he purchased the island, on which he resided until his death in 1777 at Savannah. In 1929 the owner of the island extensively remodeled the gable-roofed building. He retained its basic shape and preserved many of its features, including mantels, stair rail, and wide-board, hand-pegged floors. To the rear177 at a right angle on one side he added a 1½-story wing, also with gable roof, which more than doubled the floor space. The original, or front, section of the house, also 1½ stories in height, was constructed of “tabby,” a mixture of lime, ground from burned oyster shells, with sand, shells, and water. The wing is of frame with a stucco finish. Both parts of the residence are now roofed with Ludowici tile and feature dormers, interior chimneys, and shuttered exterior windows.

The original part of this building, which is now an eight-bedroom house and the main structure on St. Catherines Island, may have been built by Button Gwinnett in 1765 when he bought the island, where he lived until his death in 1777 in Savannah. In 1929, the island's owner did a major remodel of the gable-roofed building. He kept its basic shape and preserved many of its features, including mantels, the stair rail, and wide-board, hand-pegged floors. He also added a 1½-story wing at the back, at a right angle on one side, which more than doubled the floor space. The original front section of the house, also 1½ stories tall, was made of “tabby,” a mix of lime from burned oyster shells, sand, shells, and water. The wing is made of frame with a stucco finish. Both parts of the residence now have roofs made of Ludowici tile and feature dormers, interior chimneys, and shuttered exterior windows.

Other tabby structures on the island include seven guest cottages and about a dozen slave quarters, all probably dating from the early 19th century. Many of them are in ruins but some are in good condition. Elsewhere are four present employee residences, as well as several barns and maintenance buildings. Boundaries of old cotton and tobacco fields are discernible, as well as dozens of Indian burial mounds. Of special interest, between Persimmon Point and Wamassee Head, is the undisturbed site of the Mission of Santa Catalina (1566-ca. 1684), a Spanish mission. None of the buildings remain, but potsherds and other surface debris are plentiful.

Other tabby structures on the island include seven guest cottages and about twelve slave quarters, all likely dating back to the early 19th century. Many of them are in ruins, but some are in decent shape. Additionally, there are four current employee residences, along with several barns and maintenance buildings. You can still see the boundaries of old cotton and tobacco fields, as well as numerous Indian burial mounds. Of particular interest is the undisturbed site of the Mission of Santa Catalina (1566-ca. 1684), a Spanish mission, located between Persimmon Point and Wamassee Head. None of the buildings are left, but potsherds and other surface debris are abundant.

When this volume went to press, the National Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings was making a further study of Tabby Cottage to determine the exact degree of its authenticity in relation to Gwinnett. Privately owned St. Catherines Island, not accessible to the public, has already been accorded National Historic Landmark status because of its associations with Spanish exploration and settlement.

When this book was being published, the National Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings was conducting another study of Tabby Cottage to figure out how authentic it really is in connection to Gwinnett. St. Catherines Island, which is privately owned and not open to the public, has already been designated as a National Historic Landmark due to its links to Spanish exploration and settlement.


Whipple Birthplace, Maine  ‎⊗

Location: York County, 88 Whipple Street, Kittery.

Location: York County, 88 Whipple Street, Kittery.

William Whipple, a signer from New Hampshire, was a native of Kittery, now in Maine but then in Massachusetts. Born in this house in 1730, he probably lived in it until, like many boys of the locality, he went to sea. About 1760 he abandoned his life as a seaman and took up residence in Portsmouth, N.H.

William Whipple, a signer from New Hampshire, was originally from Kittery, which is now in Maine but was part of Massachusetts back then. Born in this house in 1730, he likely lived there until, like many local boys, he went to sea. Around 1760, he left his life as a sailor and moved to Portsmouth, N.H.

This handsome frame residence, the only one extant associated with a signer in Maine, occupies a picturesque setting on a small cove along the Piscataqua River. The two-story building has been considerably altered and enlarged over the years, but it is in excellent178 condition and rests on original foundations. It has been painted red since at least 1873.

This beautiful framed house, the only one still standing linked to a signer in Maine, sits in a charming spot on a small cove by the Piscataqua River. The two-story building has been significantly changed and expanded over the years, but it remains in great condition and is built on the original foundations. It's been painted red since at least 1873.178

Whipple Birthplace.

In its present form the house is Georgian in style with a central hall plan. The exterior walls are clapboarded. On the east, or front, elevation a round arch window on the second story sits over a pedimented center door. The ell at the rear is a 20th-century addition. A slight overhang on the south end of the house indicates that it may once have been a garrison house, and that the upper story projected over the first. This portion of the house was constructed of hemlock, square-dovetailed at the corners. At some later date, the structure was enlarged, and in the mid-19th century the exterior was completely renovated.

In its current form, the house is in the Georgian style with a central hall layout. The exterior walls are made of clapboard. On the front, or east, side, a round arch window on the second floor sits above a pedimented main door. The rear ell is a 20th-century addition. A slight overhang on the south end of the house suggests that it may have once been a garrison house, with the upper floor extending over the first. This section of the house was made from hemlock, with square dovetailing at the corners. At some later date, the building was expanded, and in the mid-19th century, the exterior was completely renovated.

The residence originally featured a center chimney floor plan. In the 19th century the central chimney was removed and a center hall with stairway added, as well as two small interior chimneys with fireplaces, one at each side of the hall. On the first floor, to the south of the hall, is the bedroom where Whipple was born; to the north, a large parlor. The original kitchen is located to the rear, or west, of the center hall and parlor.

The house originally had a center chimney layout. In the 19th century, the central chimney was taken out, and a center hall with a staircase was added, along with two small interior chimneys with fireplaces, one on each side of the hall. On the first floor, to the south of the hall, is the bedroom where Whipple was born; to the north, there's a large parlor. The original kitchen is located in the back, or west, of the center hall and parlor.

Privately occupied, the house is not open to the public.

Privately occupied, the house isn’t open to the public.


179

179

Carroll Mansion, Maryland

Location: Anne Arundel County, Duke of Gloucester Street, between Newman and St. Marys Streets, Annapolis.

Location: Anne Arundel County, Duke of Gloucester Street, between Newman and St. Marys Streets, Annapolis.

Charles Carroll III of Carrollton was born in 1737 at this townhouse, which his father had probably built about 1735. Around the age of 11, young Carroll traveled to Europe for an education and did not return to Maryland until 1765. Thereafter, he lived mainly at Doughoregan Manor but utilized his birthplace, which he inherited from his father, when in Annapolis. In 1804, when he retired from public life, he closed it up. In 1870 one of his granddaughters deeded the house and property to the Redemptionist Fathers of St. Mary’s Catholic Church, which had been built in 1858–60 on adjacent lands also donated by the Carrolls.

Charles Carroll III of Carrollton was born in 1737 at this townhouse, which his father likely built around 1735. When he was about 11, young Carroll went to Europe for his education and didn’t return to Maryland until 1765. After that, he mostly lived at Doughoregan Manor but used his birthplace, which he inherited from his father, whenever he was in Annapolis. In 1804, when he retired from public life, he closed it up. In 1870, one of his granddaughters transferred the house and property to the Redemptionist Fathers of St. Mary’s Catholic Church, which had been built between 1858 and 1860 on nearby land also donated by the Carroll family.

Carroll Mansion.

Carroll Mansion, a brick rectangular structure constructed in Flemish bond, rises 2½ stories over a basement. Belt courses mark the first- and second-floor levels on the north and south sides. Segmental arches head the windows. Two massive chimneys penetrate the slate-covered gable roof. They are located at what may have been the original gable ends. Five gabled dormers protrude from the south side of the roof; four from the north. A wood cornice with180 dentils and modillions extends along the sides and up the gables at the ends.

Carroll Mansion is a brick rectangular building built in Flemish bond, standing 2½ stories tall above a basement. Belt courses outline the first- and second-floor levels on the north and south sides. The windows are topped with segmental arches. Two large chimneys rise through the slate-covered gable roof, positioned where the original gable ends might have been. Five gabled dormers stick out from the south side of the roof, and four from the north. A wooden cornice with180 dentils and modillions runs along the sides and up the ends of the gables.

Exterior alterations include the addition of a one-story basement at the east, or present rear, end of the residence and a one-story porch and entrance at the west end. The front entrance, probably dating from the early or mid-19th century, is highlighted by a rectangular transom and sidelights. The original entrance was apparently located in the center of the north side of the house, where a passageway, erected in 1858, now connects it to St. Mary’s Church.

Exterior changes include adding a one-story basement at the east, or current rear, side of the house and a one-story porch and entrance at the west end. The front entrance, likely from the early to mid-19th century, features a rectangular transom and sidelights. The original entrance was seemingly located in the middle of the north side of the house, where a passageway built in 1858 now connects it to St. Mary’s Church.

Interior alterations have practically obliterated the original floor plan. A stair hall occupies a central compartment at the north side, and the stairs appear to be original. Only two major rooms retain some of their original finish. A large one on the south side of the first floor, now used as a chapel, has walls paneled in plaster and a plaster cornice. Another, at the east end, features a plaster cornice, a ceiling divided by triple panels, and a wooden mantelpiece.

Interior changes have nearly wiped out the original floor plan. A stair hall takes up a central space on the north side, and the stairs seem to be original. Only two main rooms still have some of their original features. A large room on the south side of the first floor, now used as a chapel, has walls paneled in plaster and a plaster cornice. Another room at the east end has a plaster cornice, a ceiling divided by triple panels, and a wooden mantelpiece.

The building, in fair condition, is used as a residence by the Redemptionist Fathers and is not accessible to the public. It is part of Colonial Annapolis Historic District.

The building, in decent shape, is used as a home by the Redemptionist Fathers and isn't open to the public. It's part of the Colonial Annapolis Historic District.


Carrollton Manor, Maryland  ‎⊗

Location: Frederick County, on the south side of Manor Wood Road, immediately east of the East Alco Aluminum Company Plant, just west of Buckeystown.

Location: Frederick County, on the south side of Manor Wood Road, right next to the East Alco Aluminum Company Plant, just west of Buckeystown.

In 1765 Charles Carroll, returning to Maryland after completing his extensive education in Europe, built this home near the mouth of the Monocacy River along Tuscarora Creek on a 10,000-acre tract of land he had acquired from his father. Young Carroll never spent much time at Carrollton Manor. Shortly after he had constructed it, his father died, and he preferred to spend his time at Doughoregan Manor, the ancestral family home in Howard County.

In 1765, Charles Carroll returned to Maryland after finishing his education in Europe and built this house near the mouth of the Monocacy River along Tuscarora Creek on a 10,000-acre property he got from his father. Young Carroll didn't spend much time at Carrollton Manor. Shortly after he built it, his father passed away, and he chose to spend his time at Doughoregan Manor, the family home in Howard County.

The rectangular manor is constructed of native limestone. It rises 2½ stories above an elevated basement. A pair of chimneys are located at the west end of the gable roof, and a single chimney at the east end. A later one-story addition extends from the east end. The central door, sheltered by a one-story porch on the north, is topped by a rectangular transom and flanked by sidelights, both181 probably dating from the Greek Revival period. Dating from the same time are the two triple windows in the first story at the rear of the house. A one-story porch that once extended across that elevation has been removed.

The rectangular manor is made of local limestone. It stands 2½ stories high above an elevated basement. There are two chimneys on the west end of the gable roof and one chimney on the east end. A later one-story addition extends from the east end. The central door, covered by a one-story porch on the north side, features a rectangular transom above and sidelights on both sides, likely from the Greek Revival period. The two triple windows on the first story at the back of the house also date from that time. A one-story porch that used to stretch across that side has been removed.

Carrollton Manor.

The house contains four rooms on each floor. East of the front entrance is a stair hall and a spacious dining room; to the west, a library and living room. Large double doors connect the living and dining rooms. The second floor contains four bedrooms; the attic, four more.

The house has four rooms on each floor. To the east of the front entrance is a stair hall and a big dining room; to the west are a library and a living room. Large double doors connect the living room and the dining room. The second floor has four bedrooms; the attic has four more.

Upon Carroll’s death, his descendants inherited the manor. In 1968 an aluminum company bought the property and erected a large office and plant buildings and a spur railroad track to the west of the house. In excellent condition, though never restored, it is today used as a company residence and is not open to visitors. A nearby chapel, erected by Carroll, is still used as a parish church.

Upon Carroll’s death, his descendants inherited the manor. In 1968, an aluminum company purchased the property and constructed large office and plant buildings along with a spur railroad track to the west of the house. It remains in excellent condition, although it has never been restored, and is currently used as a company residence, not open to visitors. A nearby chapel, built by Carroll, is still in use as a parish church.


Chase-Lloyd House, Maryland  ∆

Location: Anne Arundel County, 22 Maryland Avenue, Annapolis.

Location: Anne Arundel County, 22 Maryland Avenue, Annapolis.

Although Samuel Chase began building this house in 1769 while he was a young lawyer, he never resided in it, for he sold it unfinished in 1771 to Edward Lloyd IV, a wealthy Maryland planter and politician. Lloyd immediately engaged architect William Buckland, newly182 arrived in Annapolis, to continue construction, completed 3 years later with the aid of local architect William Noke.

Although Samuel Chase started building this house in 1769 when he was a young lawyer, he never lived in it because he sold it unfinished in 1771 to Edward Lloyd IV, a wealthy planter and politician from Maryland. Lloyd immediately hired architect William Buckland, who had just arrived in Annapolis, to continue construction, which was completed 3 years later with the help of local architect William Noke.

Chase-Lloyd House.

The structure, one of the first three-story Georgian townhouses erected in the American Colonies, ranks among the finest of its type in the United States and is one of the major attractions in Colonial Annapolis Historic District. The house rises three full stories over a high basement. Two massive interior chimneys protrude through the broad, low, hip-on-hip roof. The brick walls are laid in Flemish bond and adorned by belt courses of rubbed brick at the second- and third-floor levels. An enriched cornice embellishes the roofline. At the front, or east, facade the axial line features a tall, projecting central pavilion and entranceway, an arched window on the third floor, and crowning pediment with a small bull’s-eye window.

The building is one of the first three-story Georgian townhouses built in the American Colonies and is considered one of the best examples of its kind in the United States. It's a major attraction in the Colonial Annapolis Historic District. The house has three full stories above a high basement. Two large interior chimneys extend from the broad, low, hip-on-hip roof. The brick walls are arranged in Flemish bond and decorated with belt courses of rubbed brick on the second and third floors. An ornate cornice enhances the roofline. On the front, or east, facade, the central axis features a tall, protruding pavilion and entrance, an arched window on the third floor, and a decorative pediment topped with a small bull’s-eye window.

Of particular note is the entranceway, in essentially a Palladian motif. The three-section composition was rarely used in Georgian houses before the Revolution. The door is topped by a fanlight and flanked by two panels of sidelights. The three openings are framed by two engaged Ionic columns and two Ionic pilasters which support an entablature that becomes an open pediment over the door. The triple windows on the second floor over the entrance door and the183 arched windows in the center of the three on the third are also unusual.

Of particular note is the entranceway, designed in a Palladian style. The three-section layout was rarely seen in Georgian houses before the Revolution. The door is topped by a fanlight and flanked by two sidelights. The three openings are framed by two engaged Ionic columns and two Ionic pilasters that support an entablature, which forms an open pediment over the door. The triple windows on the second floor above the entrance and the arched windows in the center of the three on the third floor are also unusual.

The sides of the house lack architectural distinction, but in the rear a large Palladian window within a brick arch ornaments and lights the interior stair landing. The only exterior alterations are a three-story wooden screened porch and adjoining steel fire escape on the south side of the structure near the west corner.

The sides of the house don't have any standout architectural features, but at the back, a large Palladian window set in a brick arch beautifies and brightens the interior stair landing. The only changes made to the exterior are a three-story wooden screened porch and a steel fire escape that are located on the south side of the building near the west corner.

The floor plan is typical of the center hall type of house, with four rooms on each floor, except that lateral halls divide the front and rear rooms. The unusually large center hall is dominated by a magnificent stairway and a pair of free-standing Ionic columns bearing a full entablature. A parlor, large dining room, sitting room, and breakfast room are located on the first floor, which has been only slightly altered. A small back stairway is adjacent to the breakfast room. Ornamentation of the plaster ceilings and doorways is outstanding. The dining room, the most elaborate room, contains an imported Italian mantelpiece that is richly decorated. The second floor is also exquisitely ornamented.

The layout is typical of a center hall style house, featuring four rooms on each floor, with side halls separating the front and back rooms. The surprisingly spacious center hall is highlighted by a stunning staircase and a pair of freestanding Ionic columns supporting a complete entablature. On the first floor, you'll find a parlor, a large dining room, a sitting room, and a breakfast room, which has seen only minor changes. A small back stairway is next to the breakfast room. The decorative plaster ceilings and doorways are exceptional. The dining room, the most elaborate space, includes an imported Italian mantelpiece that is richly adorned. The second floor is also beautifully decorated.

The Lloyd family owned the house until 1847, when Chase’s descendants acquired it. In 1888 one of them bequeathed it to the Protestant Episcopal Church for use as a home for elderly women. It is in excellent condition and is well maintained. The first floor is open to visitors and contains some items that belonged to the Lloyds or to the later Chase owners. The upper two floors are utilized for the ladies’ home.

The Lloyd family owned the house until 1847, when Chase’s descendants took over. In 1888, one of them donated it to the Protestant Episcopal Church to be used as a home for elderly women. It’s in great shape and well-kept. The first floor is open to visitors and features some items that belonged to the Lloyds or the later Chase owners. The upper two floors are used for the women’s home.


Deshon-Caton-Carroll House, Maryland  ‎⊗

Location: 800 East Lombard Street, Baltimore.

Location: 800 East Lombard Street, Baltimore.

This was the winter home of Charles Carroll of Carrollton during his twilight years and the site of his death in 1832. Christopher Deshon, a Baltimore merchant, built it in 1811–12, and in 1818 sold it to Richard Caton, husband of Carroll’s youngest daughter, Mary. Carroll spent the winters there with the couple until his demise. The rest of the time, he resided at Doughoregan Manor in Howard County.

This was the winter home of Charles Carroll of Carrollton during his later years and the place where he died in 1832. Christopher Deshon, a merchant from Baltimore, built it in 1811–12 and sold it to Richard Caton, who was married to Carroll’s youngest daughter, Mary, in 1818. Carroll spent his winters there with the couple until he passed away. The rest of the time, he lived at Doughoregan Manor in Howard County.

The Deshon-Caton-Carroll House, a good example of Classic Revival architecture, is constructed of brick laid in Flemish bond. It184 stands 3½ stories high. Six pedimented dormers—three each at the south (front) and north elevations—as well as a central chimney and two end chimneys pierce the low gable roof. A belt course at the second-floor line and dentil cornice at roof level, both of sandstone, extend across the north and south elevations. Recessed rectangular panels of wood are inserted between the second- and third-story windows of the south and west elevations. A large semicircular window is located in the west gable of the attic story. The wide-paneled center door at the main entrance to the house is sheltered by an Ionic marble portico surmounted by an iron railing.

The Deshon-Caton-Carroll House, a great example of Classic Revival architecture, is built with brick laid in Flemish bond. It184 stands 3½ stories tall. Six pedimented dormers—three on the south (front) and three on the north sides—along with a central chimney and two end chimneys break through the low gable roof. A belt course made of sandstone runs along the second-floor line, and a dentil cornice at roof level extends across the north and south sides. Recessed rectangular wood panels are placed between the second- and third-story windows on the south and west sides. A large semicircular window is found in the west gable of the attic story. The main entrance features a wide-paneled center door, which is sheltered by an Ionic marble portico topped with an iron railing.

Deshon-Caton-Carroll House.

The central hall plan provides for four large rooms, two on each side of the hallway on each of the first three floors. The front entrance opens into a stair hall, in which an elegant spiral stairway rises in an open well up through the three stories. A counting room for business purposes, family dining room, breakfast room, and study occupy the first floor. The second floor, once used primarily for recreation and formal entertainment, contains a large parlor, formal dining room, music room, and library. Bedrooms occupy the third floor, and the attic at one time contained slave quarters.

The central hall layout includes four large rooms, two on each side of the hallway on the first three floors. The front entrance leads into a stair hall, where an elegant spiral staircase rises through an open space across all three stories. The first floor has a counting room for business, a family dining room, a breakfast room, and a study. The second floor, which was mainly for recreation and formal entertaining, features a large parlor, a formal dining room, a music room, and a library. The third floor is dedicated to bedrooms, while the attic used to have slave quarters.

The house remained in the Caton family until 1856. During the last quarter of that century, a furniture store occupied the first floor, and the owner divided the upper floors into apartments. In 1914 the city of Baltimore acquired the building, and 3 years later put it to use as the “Carroll Vocational School.” From about 1930 until 1956 the structure served as a recreation center. Subsequently the house faced the threat of demolition, prevented by the efforts of185 the Charles Carroll American Heritage Association, Inc. In 1963 the mayor of Baltimore decided that the residence should be preserved. Upon completion of restoration and renovation, in 1967, it was placed under the Municipal Museum, a nonprofit corporation. This organization operates it today for the city as a historic house museum.

The house stayed in the Caton family until 1856. In the last part of that century, a furniture store took over the first floor, and the owner turned the upper floors into apartments. In 1914, the city of Baltimore bought the building, and three years later converted it into the “Carroll Vocational School.” From around 1930 until 1956, the building acted as a recreation center. After that, it faced the risk of being demolished, but the Charles Carroll American Heritage Association, Inc. stepped in to save it. In 1963, the mayor of Baltimore decided the residence should be preserved. After its restoration and renovation in 1967, it became part of the Municipal Museum, a nonprofit organization. This group manages it today as a historic house museum.


Doughoregan Manor, Maryland  ∆

Location: Howard County, on the west side of Manor Lane, about 1 mile south of Md. 144 and 8 miles west of Ellicott City.

Location: Howard County, on the west side of Manor Lane, approximately 1 mile south of Md. 144 and 8 miles west of Ellicott City.

Charles Carroll III of Carrollton preferred this manor, the ancestral family home, over his other residences. He lived in it for most of the period 1766–1832 rather than at Carrollton Manor or his Annapolis townhouse. In 1717 Charles Carroll I had acquired the 10,000 acres that originally comprised the estate. His son Charles II probably built the main section of the mansion about a decade later. In the 1760’s Charles III inherited it. In the 1830’s, after his death in 1832, it was greatly enlarged. It is still owned and occupied by the Carroll family.

Charles Carroll III of Carrollton preferred this manor, the family’s ancestral home, over his other residences. He lived there for most of the time from 1766 to 1832 instead of at Carrollton Manor or his townhouse in Annapolis. In 1717, Charles Carroll I acquired the 10,000 acres that originally made up the estate. His son, Charles II, likely built the main part of the mansion about ten years later. In the 1760s, Charles III inherited it. In the 1830s, after his death in 1832, it was significantly enlarged. It is still owned and occupied by the Carroll family.

Doughoregan Manor.

Much changed over the years, Doughoregan Manor is now an architecturally distinguished complex of buildings united into one long structure, about 300 feet in extent. The original manor was a Georgian, 1½-story, brick structure with gambrel roof and two186 pairs of end chimneys. A kitchen-servants’ quarters and a chapel, both probably one-story and constructed of brick about 1780, stood detached from the house, on the south and north respectively.

Much has changed over the years; Doughoregan Manor is now a distinct architectural complex made up of buildings connected into one long structure, about 300 feet long. The original manor was a Georgian, one-and-a-half-story, brick building with a gambrel roof and two pairs of end chimneys. A kitchen, servants’ quarters, and a chapel, both likely one-story and built of brick around 1780, were located separately from the house, on the south and north sides, respectively.

In the 1830’s Charles Carroll V undertook a comprehensive expansion in the Greek Revival style that converted the manor to its present five-part composition. He raised the main house to two stories and cut off the gable roof to form a flat deck, which was balustraded and surmounted by an octagonal cupola. At the front (east) center door he added a one-story portico with four Doric columns. To the rear of the residence, he attached another portico, over which he erected a room. Along both sides of the rear portico, he constructed a covered, one-story veranda with iron columns that extended the length of the main house. The heights of the kitchen-servants’ quarters and the chapel were raised and they were connected to the main house by two-story wings, topped by unifying wooden walkways.

In the 1830s, Charles Carroll V undertook a major expansion in the Greek Revival style, transforming the manor into its current five-part layout. He raised the main house to two stories and replaced the gable roof with a flat deck, which was bordered by a railing and topped with an octagonal cupola. At the front (east) center door, he added a one-story portico supported by four Doric columns. At the back of the residence, he attached another portico, on top of which he built an additional room. Along both sides of the rear portico, he constructed a covered, one-story veranda with iron columns that ran the length of the main house. The heights of the kitchen-servants' quarters and the chapel were increased, and they were connected to the main house by two-story wings topped with unifying wooden walkways.

Inside the central part of the mansion, an oak-paneled central hall extends from front to rear. The principal stairway is located in a small side hall adjacent to the front of the main hall. On one side of the main hall in the 1727 portion of the house are library and large parlor; on the other, small parlor and dining room. The second-floor bedrooms, remodeled in the 1830’s, were completely renovated and redecorated about 1915. The chapel, refurbished in the 1830’s and again after the Civil War, is in good condition and is still used as a parish church. It is one of the few surviving private chapels in the United States dating from the 18th century. The grave of Charles Carroll III is located next to the altar.

Inside the main part of the mansion, a central hall with oak-paneled walls runs from the front to the back. The main staircase is situated in a small side hall next to the front of the main hall. On one side of the main hall, built in 1727, are the library and a large parlor; on the other side are a small parlor and the dining room. The second-floor bedrooms, updated in the 1830s, were completely renovated and redecorated around 1915. The chapel, renovated in the 1830s and again after the Civil War, is well-maintained and still serves as a parish church. It is one of the few remaining private chapels in the United States from the 18th century. The grave of Charles Carroll III is located next to the altar.

The estate, comprising 2,800 acres, and mansion are well maintained. They are not open to the public.

The estate, covering 2,800 acres, and the mansion are well kept. They aren't open to the public.


Habre-de-Venture, Maryland  ∆

Location: Charles County, on the west side of Rose Hill Road, which connects Md. 6 and Md. 225, about 1 mile north of Port Tobacco.

Location: Charles County, west of Rose Hill Road, which links MD 6 and MD 225, approximately 1 mile north of Port Tobacco.

In 1771 Thomas Stone built this plantation house near the busy riverport town of Port Tobacco, Md. He lived in it during his most politically active years, and on his death in 1787 was buried in the adjacent family graveyard.

In 1771, Thomas Stone built this plantation house near the bustling riverport town of Port Tobacco, Md. He lived there during his most politically active years, and upon his death in 1787, he was buried in the nearby family graveyard.

187

187

Habre-de-Venture.

A Georgian structure of brick and frame, Habre-de-Venture consists of five parts: a central house connected to two wings by two covered passageways, or “hyphens.” The hyphens and wings extend southward to form a semicircle. The main building is a 1½-story structure over an elevated basement. It has a dormered gambrel roof flanked by external end chimneys. The brick walls are laid in Flemish bond with glazed headers. Center doors and full-length, one-story porches are located at the front and rear of the house.

A Georgian building made of brick and timber, Habre-de-Venture includes five sections: a central house linked to two wings by two covered passageways, or “hyphens.” The hyphens and wings extend southward to create a semicircle. The main building is a 1½-story structure sitting on a raised basement. It features a dormered gambrel roof with external end chimneys on either side. The brick walls are arranged in Flemish bond with glazed headers. There are center doors and full-length, one-story porches at both the front and back of the house.

A center hall, with stairs set against its west wall, divides the central unit into dining and living rooms. In 1928 the Baltimore Museum of Art removed the elaborate hand-carved paneling in the living room; it was subsequently replaced with a replica. The fireplace wall in the dining room protrudes out into the room, and the flue curves back to the wall and up to the ceiling.

A central hallway, with stairs along its west wall, separates the main area into dining and living rooms. In 1928, the Baltimore Museum of Art took out the intricate hand-carved paneling in the living room; it was later replaced with a replica. The fireplace wall in the dining room sticks out into the room, and the flue bends back to the wall and extends up to the ceiling.

To the west of the central house is the kitchen wing, a low, two-story, gable-roofed structure with brick ends and frame sides. Its second story, added about 1820, contains two bedrooms. The connecting hyphen, originally gabled roof and one story in height and containing a breakfast room, was increased to 1½ stories by the addition of a gambrel roof with dormers to provide bathrooms for the second floor of the main house. The east wing, a gambrel-roofed, low, 1½-story frame structure that has one room on each floor, served as Stone’s law office. A one-story gabled brick hyphen connects it to the main house.

To the west of the main house is the kitchen wing, a low, two-story structure with a gable roof, brick ends, and framed sides. Its second story, added around 1820, has two bedrooms. The connecting hyphen, originally a one-story gabled roof that housed a breakfast room, was raised to 1½ stories with the addition of a gambrel roof and dormers to create bathrooms for the main house's second floor. The east wing, a low, 1½-story gambrel-roofed frame building with one room on each floor, served as Stone’s law office. A one-story gabled brick hyphen connects it to the main house.

188 Except for the alterations mentioned above, Habre-de-Venture has changed but slightly through the years. In excellent condition and carefully restored, it now serves as a private residence and is not shown publicly.

188 Other than the changes mentioned above, Habre-de-Venture has barely changed over the years. It’s in great shape and has been carefully restored; it now functions as a private home and isn’t open to the public.


Paca House, Maryland  ∆

Location: Anne Arundel County, 186 Prince George Street, Annapolis.

Location: Anne Arundel County, 186 Prince George Street, Annapolis.

William Paca, a young, newly married lawyer, built this townhouse in the years 1763–65 as his principal residence and occupied it until 1780. At that time, a few months after the death of his second wife, he sold the house and moved to Wye Plantation, a country estate in Queen Annes County he had acquired about 1760.

William Paca, a young lawyer who had just gotten married, built this townhouse between 1763 and 1765 as his main home and lived there until 1780. A few months after his second wife passed away, he sold the house and moved to Wye Plantation, a country estate in Queen Anne's County that he had bought around 1760.

Paca House.

The Paca House is a large, five-part Georgian structure, today part of Colonial Annapolis Historic District. Two brick wings (kitchen and office) sit at right angles to the main axis of the central house, to which they are connected by brick passageways, or hyphens. The central unit is a gable-roofed brick structure of 2½ stories over an elevated basement. The front facade is laid in all-header bond, and the ends in Flemish bond. The window arches, of rubbed brick,189 are flat. A small, one-story frame porch, which is pedimented and done in modified Roman Doric style, provides access to the central entrance.

The Paca House is a large, five-part Georgian building, now part of the Colonial Annapolis Historic District. Two brick wings (kitchen and office) are positioned at right angles to the main part of the central house, connected by brick passageways, or hyphens. The central unit is a gable-roofed brick structure with 2½ stories above an elevated basement. The front facade features all-header bond, while the ends are in Flemish bond. The window arches, made of rubbed brick, are flat. A small, one-story frame porch, which has a pediment and is styled in a modified Roman Doric way, leads to the central entrance.

Large brick chimneys rise from both ends of the central house, and smaller ones from the wings. Three gabled dormers are situated in the front of the main roof and two in the rear. The 1½-story wings are also gable-roofed. The west wing and both of the hyphens had been raised to two stories in the 19th century, but were recently lowered to their original height.

Large brick chimneys rise from both ends of the main house, with smaller ones on the wings. There are three gabled dormers at the front of the main roof and two at the back. The 1½-story wings also have gable roofs. The west wing and both hyphens had been raised to two stories in the 19th century but were recently brought back down to their original height.

On each side of the center hall in the main house are two rooms. The interior has been greatly altered over the years, and portions of the original wood and plaster finish remain only in the center hall, the stair hall behind it, and the parlor. The main stairway is equipped with the original Chinese Chippendale balustrade.

On each side of the central hallway in the main house, there are two rooms. The interior has changed significantly over the years, and only parts of the original wood and plaster finish are left in the central hall, the stair hall behind it, and the parlor. The main staircase features the original Chinese Chippendale railing.

In 1899 the Paca House became the Carvel Hall Hotel, enlarged in 1906 by rear additions that completely hid the back of the original house. In 1964, when the structure faced demolition, Historic Annapolis, Inc., purchased the Paca House portion. The next year, the State of Maryland acquired the entire property. In 1967–69 it razed the 1906 hotel additions and restored the gardens. Presently, the Maryland Historical Trust, a public agency, holds title to the house, but Historic Annapolis, Inc., retains all the responsibilities and rights of ownership and administration. When this volume went to press, the residence was undergoing an extensive restoration program and was not accessible to the public. Historic Annapolis, Inc., plans to utilize it as a guesthouse for visiting dignitaries, though the first floor will be open to visitors.

In 1899, the Paca House became the Carvel Hall Hotel, which was expanded in 1906 with rear additions that completely concealed the back of the original house. In 1964, when the structure was at risk of demolition, Historic Annapolis, Inc. purchased the Paca House section. The following year, the State of Maryland acquired the entire property. Between 1967 and 1969, it demolished the 1906 hotel additions and restored the gardens. Currently, the Maryland Historical Trust, a public agency, holds the title to the house, but Historic Annapolis, Inc. maintains all responsibilities and rights of ownership and administration. When this volume was published, the residence was undergoing a major restoration project and was not open to the public. Historic Annapolis, Inc. plans to use it as a guesthouse for visiting dignitaries, although the first floor will be available for visitors.


Peggy Stewart House, Maryland

Location: Anne Arundel County, 207 Hanover Street, Annapolis.

Location: Anne Arundel County, 207 Hanover Street, Annapolis.

Thomas Stone purchased this Georgian residence in 1783 and until his death 4 years later occupied it while in Annapolis, though he maintained his home at Habre-de-Venture in Charles County. The Peggy Stewart House was built sometime between 1761 and 1764 by Thomas Rutland. Its owner in the period 1772–79 was Anthony Stewart, an Annapolis merchant. In 1774 Revolutionaries forced him to burn his ship, the Peggy Stewart, when he attempted to land a190 cargo of tea on which he had paid taxes. Five years later, he fled to England.

Thomas Stone bought this Georgian home in 1783 and lived there until his death four years later while he was in Annapolis, although he kept his main residence at Habre-de-Venture in Charles County. The Peggy Stewart House was built sometime between 1761 and 1764 by Thomas Rutland. From 1772 to 1779, it was owned by Anthony Stewart, a merchant from Annapolis. In 1774, Revolutionaries forced him to burn his ship, the Peggy Stewart, when he tried to unload a cargo of tea that he had already paid taxes on. Five years later, he fled to England.

Peggy Stewart House.

Over the years, the rectangular brick house has been substantially modified on both the exterior and interior. Its 2½ stories rest on an elevated basement. At the time of a major alteration in 1894, the gable roof was replaced by the present hip roof, which has a cutoff deck and balustrade, and the chimneys were rebuilt in their current form. Two gabled dormers are located at the front of the roof and one at each side. Highlighting the ends of the house are central pavilions, which have triangular pediments with round center windows. The chimneys cut through the front corners of the pediments. A191 wooden box cornice with frieze board below extends around the eaves. A large wing at the rear is a later addition.

Over the years, the rectangular brick house has been significantly changed on both the outside and inside. Its 2½ stories sit on an elevated basement. During a major renovation in 1894, the gable roof was replaced with the current hip roof, which features a cutoff deck and balustrade, and the chimneys were reconstructed in their present form. There are two gabled dormers on the front of the roof and one on each side. Central pavilions at the ends of the house have triangular pediments with round windows in the center. The chimneys extend through the front corners of the pediments. A191 wooden box cornice with a frieze board below wraps around the eaves. A large wing at the back is a later addition.

The front facade of the house is comprised of all-header bond and the sides of English bond. The basement and first-story windows are topped by segmental arches, but the second-story windows have flat ones. The sills are of stone, and louvered shutters flank the first- and second-floor windows. The front entranceway, sheltered by a small wooden porch with a triangular broken pediment, has a paneled door that is surmounted by a rectangular glazed transom.

The front of the house is made of all-header bond, while the sides are in English bond. The basement and first-floor windows have curved tops, but the second-floor windows are flat. The sills are made of stone, and there are louvered shutters on the first and second floors. The front entrance, protected by a small wooden porch with a triangular broken pediment, features a paneled door topped by a rectangular glass transom.

In 1837 the house had 12 rooms, eight of which were equipped with fireplaces. The original portion of the house, excluding the rear addition, has a center hall floor plan. The stairs are set against the east wall, beyond which is a large living room. A parlor and dining room are situated to the west of the hall. Five bedrooms are located upstairs. The interior of the house has been extensively remodeled in recent times. Only one fireplace, in the southeast front room on the second floor, retains its original mantel.

In 1837, the house had 12 rooms, eight of which had fireplaces. The original part of the house, not including the rear addition, features a center hall floor plan. The stairs are against the east wall, and beyond that is a large living room. A parlor and dining room are located to the west of the hall. Five bedrooms are on the upper floor. The interior of the house has been extensively remodeled recently. Only one fireplace, in the southeast front room on the second floor, still has its original mantel.

The Peggy Stewart House, also known as the Rutland-Peggy Stewart House and the Rutland-Stewart-Stone House, is privately owned and is not open to the public. It is part of Colonial Annapolis Historic District.

The Peggy Stewart House, also called the Rutland-Peggy Stewart House and the Rutland-Stewart-Stone House, is privately owned and isn’t open to the public. It’s part of the Colonial Annapolis Historic District.


Adams (John) Birthplace, Massachusetts  ∆

Location: Norfolk County, 133 Franklin Street, Quincy.

Location: Norfolk County, 133 Franklin Street, Quincy.

This was the original homestead of the Adams family and the birthplace of John Adams. Although not architecturally impressive, it is historically notable as the place where John Adams grew to manhood. It is adjacent to the John Quincy Adams Birthplace.

This was the original home of the Adams family and the birthplace of John Adams. While it may not be architecturally striking, it is historically significant as the place where John Adams grew up. It is next to the John Quincy Adams Birthplace.

The original house, a typical New England saltbox structure of frame construction with a massive central chimney, was probably built about 1681. It consisted of two lower and two upper rooms. Extensive alterations were made over the years. The rear lean-to, built at some unknown date in the 18th century, added two downstairs rooms and two small upper ones, separated by a large attic.

The original house, a typical New England saltbox design made of wood with a large central chimney, was likely built around 1681. It had two lower rooms and two upper ones. Over the years, many changes were made. The back lean-to, constructed at some unspecified time in the 18th century, added two downstairs rooms and two small upper rooms, divided by a large attic.

In 1720 John Adams’ father, “Deacon” John Adams, purchased the house, where in 1735 young John was born. He lived there until192 his marriage in 1764. He and his bride moved into a residence next door that he had inherited from his father in 1761 and 6 years later was to be the birthplace of his son John Quincy. In 1774 John bought his birthplace home from his brother. His public duties and legal business kept him away most of the time. By 1783, when he and his family were in Europe, tenants resided in both the John Adams Birthplace and the John Quincy Adams Birthplace. In 1788, when John Adams sailed home, he settled at “Peacefield,” or the “Old House,” now Adams National Historic Site, in another part of Quincy. In 1803 he sold both birthplaces to his son John Quincy.

In 1720, John Adams' father, "Deacon" John Adams, bought the house where young John was born in 1735. He lived there until his wedding in 1764. He and his new wife moved into a house next door that he inherited from his father in 1761, which six years later would become the birthplace of his son, John Quincy. In 1774, John purchased his childhood home from his brother. His public duties and legal work often kept him away. By 1783, when he and his family were in Europe, tenants were living in both the John Adams Birthplace and the John Quincy Adams Birthplace. In 1788, when John Adams sailed back home, he settled at “Peacefield,” or the “Old House,” now known as Adams National Historic Site, in another part of Quincy. In 1803, he sold both birthplaces to his son John Quincy.

John Adams and John Quincy Adams Birthplaces.

The John Adams Birthplace remained in the possession of the Adams family until 1940, when they deeded it to the city of Quincy. In 1896 they had given the Adams Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, permission to restore the residence, which the next year was made accessible to the public. When the Adams Chapter dissolved in 1950, the Quincy Historical Society took over the administration. In excellent condition and still owned by the city, the house is open to the public.

The John Adams Birthplace stayed in the Adams family's ownership until 1940, when they transferred it to the city of Quincy. In 1896, they allowed the Adams Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, to restore the house, which opened to the public the following year. When the Adams Chapter disbanded in 1950, the Quincy Historical Society took over its management. The house is in great condition and is still owned by the city, remaining open to the public.


Adams (John Quincy) Birthplace, Massachusetts  ∆

Location: Norfolk County, 141 Franklin Street, Quincy.

Location: Norfolk County, 141 Franklin Street, Quincy.

This frame structure was John Adams’ residence and law office during the War for Independence and the birthplace of his son John193 Quincy. In 1744 “Deacon” John Adams had acquired the residence, the oldest part of which may date from 1663. In 1761 he bequeathed it to young John. At the time of the latter’s marriage 3 years later, he moved into it from his neighboring birthplace so that he could better accommodate his library and set up a law office. In 1767 John Quincy was born in the house.

This frame structure was John Adams' home and law office during the War for Independence and the birthplace of his son John Quincy. In 1744, “Deacon” John Adams purchased the residence, the oldest part of which may date back to 1663. In 1761, he passed it down to young John. When John got married three years later, he moved in from his nearby birthplace to better fit his library and set up a law office. John Quincy was born in the house in 1767.

Shortly thereafter, John’s growing law practice and role in public affairs made it convenient for him to live in Boston most of the time, but his wife and son remained in the Quincy home until after the War for Independence. By 1783, when the family was in Europe, tenants were occupying it. After coming back to the United States in 1788, John Adams took up residence at “Peacefield,” or the “Old House,” now Adams National Historic Site. In 1803 John Quincy purchased both birthplaces from his father, and from 1805 to 1807 lived in his own birthplace.

Shortly after that, John’s expanding law practice and involvement in public affairs made it easier for him to live in Boston most of the time, but his wife and son stayed in their Quincy home until after the War for Independence. By 1783, when the family was in Europe, tenants were living there. After returning to the United States in 1788, John Adams moved to “Peacefield,” or the “Old House,” which is now the Adams National Historic Site. In 1803, John Quincy bought both birthplaces from his father, and from 1805 to 1807, he lived in his own birthplace.

The John Quincy Adams Birthplace is well preserved. Like the John Adams Birthplace, it is of typical New England saltbox design, originally comprised of two upper and two lower rooms arranged around a huge central chimney, and has been extensively altered. John Adams added a lean-to of two rooms at the back for use as a new kitchen during the time he used the original kitchen as a law office-library.

The John Quincy Adams Birthplace is well preserved. Like the John Adams Birthplace, it features the classic New England saltbox design, originally made up of two upper and two lower rooms arranged around a large central chimney, and has undergone significant changes. John Adams added a lean-to with two rooms at the back to serve as a new kitchen while he used the original kitchen as a law office-library.

In 1897 the Quincy Historical Society, aided by Adams heirs, restored and opened the John Quincy Adams Birthplace to the public. In 1940 the Adams family turned it over to the city of Quincy. Administered by the Quincy Historical Society, it is accessible to the public.

In 1897, the Quincy Historical Society, with the help of the Adams heirs, restored and opened the John Quincy Adams Birthplace to the public. In 1940, the Adams family handed it over to the city of Quincy. Managed by the Quincy Historical Society, it is open to the public.


Adams National Historic Site, Massachusetts ‎☑

Location: Norfolk County, bounded by Adams Street, Furnace Brook Parkway, and Newport Avenue, Quincy; address: 135 Adams Street, Quincy, Mass. 02169.

Location: Norfolk County, bordered by Adams Street, Furnace Brook Parkway, and Newport Avenue in Quincy; address: 135 Adams Street, Quincy, MA 02169.

Featuring the Adams Mansion, this site is a memorial to four generations of the distinguished Adams family, who resided in it from 1788 until 1927.

Featuring the Adams Mansion, this site is a tribute to four generations of the notable Adams family, who lived here from 1788 until 1927.

John Adams (1735–1826), signer of the Declaration of Independence, diplomat, the first Vice President, and the second President,194 founded a long line of men who were outstanding in politics and intellectual life. John Quincy (1767–1848), his son, won fame as a diplomat, U.S. Congressman, Secretary of State, and sixth President. Charles Francis Adams (1807–86), son of John Quincy, became a U.S. Congressman, diplomat, and author. His four sons—John Quincy II (1833–94), Charles Francis, Jr. (1835–1915), Henry (1838–1918), and Brooks (1848–1927)—made notable marks in politics, literature, and historiography.

John Adams (1735–1826), a signer of the Declaration of Independence, diplomat, the first Vice President, and the second President,194 established a legacy of men who excelled in politics and intellectual pursuits. His son, John Quincy (1767–1848), gained recognition as a diplomat, U.S. Congressman, Secretary of State, and sixth President. Charles Francis Adams (1807–86), John Quincy’s son, became a U.S. Congressman, diplomat, and author. His four sons—John Quincy II (1833–94), Charles Francis, Jr. (1835–1915), Henry (1838–1918), and Brooks (1848–1927)—made significant contributions in politics, literature, and history.

Adams Mansion.

The Adams Mansion, named “Peacefield” by John Adams but known to some as the Vassall-Adams House and later to the Adams family as the “Old House,” was dear and close to all of them. In 1730–31 Maj. Leonard Vassall, a wealthy West Indian sugar planter who had come to Massachusetts some 8 years before, built the oldest part of the building. Comprising the front western section of the present residence, it was a 2½-story frame structure of Georgian design with clapboarded walls and gambrel roof. The first floor contained two rooms separated by a central stair hall; the second floor, two bedrooms and center hall; and the dormered attic, three smaller chambers. The kitchen and servants’ quarters were detached.

The Adams Mansion, named “Peacefield” by John Adams but also known as the Vassall-Adams House and later referred to by the Adams family as the “Old House,” was cherished by them all. In 1730–31, Maj. Leonard Vassall, a wealthy West Indian sugar planter who had moved to Massachusetts about eight years earlier, built the oldest part of the house. This section, which makes up the front western part of the current residence, was a 2½-story frame structure in Georgian style with clapboard walls and a gambrel roof. The first floor had two rooms divided by a central stair hall; the second floor had two bedrooms and a center hall; and the dormered attic featured three smaller rooms. The kitchen and servants’ quarters were in a separate building.

John Adams, while still Minister to Great Britain, bought the house in September 1787 from Vassall’s grandson, Leonard Vassall Borland, and on his return the next year took possession. At that time, he apparently attached the 2½-story kitchen and servants’ quarters to the rear, or northwest, corner of the main structure. In 1800, near the end of his Presidency, he doubled the size of the residence195 by adding a large, 2½-story, L-shaped wing of frame at the east end. It was constructed in the same Georgian style as the original house and contained on the first floor a second entry hall and staircase and the “Long Room” to the east of the hall. Adams’ large study-library was located on the second floor.

John Adams, while still serving as Minister to Great Britain, purchased the house in September 1787 from Vassall’s grandson, Leonard Vassall Borland, and moved in the following year. At that time, he apparently added a 2½-story kitchen and staff quarters to the back, or northwest, corner of the main building. In 1800, towards the end of his presidency, he expanded the residence195 by adding a large, 2½-story, L-shaped wing made of wood at the east end. It was built in the same Georgian style as the original house and included a second entry hall and staircase on the first floor, along with the “Long Room” to the east of the hall. Adams’ spacious study-library was situated on the second floor.

Other additions were made in the 19th century. In 1836 John Quincy Adams built the passage along the back, or north, side of the structure connecting the two rear service ells. In 1869 Charles Francis added 30 feet to the kitchen ell for additional servants’ quarters; the following year, a detached stone library overlooking the garden; and in 1873, the stone stable. Brooks constructed the present entrance gates in 1906.

Other additions were made in the 19th century. In 1836, John Quincy Adams built a passage along the back, or north, side of the building that connected the two rear service wings. In 1869, Charles Francis expanded the kitchen wing by 30 feet to create more living space for servants; the following year, a separate stone library was added that overlooked the garden; and in 1873, the stone stable was built. Brooks constructed the current entrance gates in 1906.

After retiring from the Presidency in 1801, John Adams lived in the house year round until his death in 1826. Subsequently, until Brooks’ death in 1927, other family members resided in it full time or spent their summers there. The furnishings, to which each generation contributed, reveal the continuity of life in the residence and the tastes of the Adams family.

After stepping down from the presidency in 1801, John Adams lived in the house year-round until he passed away in 1826. After that, until Brooks’ death in 1927, other family members either lived there full time or spent their summers there. The furnishings, which each generation added to, show the lasting presence of life in the home and the preferences of the Adams family.

In 1946 the Adams Memorial Society donated the property to the Federal Government. Consisting of almost 5 acres, it includes the well-maintained house, library, garden, and stables. It may be visited from spring until the fall.

In 1946, the Adams Memorial Society gave the property to the Federal Government. Covering nearly 5 acres, it features a well-kept house, library, garden, and stables. It is open for visits from spring to fall.


Elmwood, Massachusetts  ∆

Location: Middlesex County, 33 Elmwood Street, Cambridge.

Location: Middlesex County, 33 Elmwood Street, Cambridge.

This impressive 18th-century mansion, also known as the Oliver-Gerry-Lowell House, was the residence of three men prominent in American history: Andrew Oliver, royal Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts (1771–74); Elbridge Gerry, politician, diplomat, Governor of the Commonwealth, signer of the Declaration, U.S. Representative, and Vice President; and James Russell Lowell, author, poet, teacher, and statesman.

This impressive 18th-century mansion, also known as the Oliver-Gerry-Lowell House, was home to three important figures in American history: Andrew Oliver, the royal Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts (1771–74); Elbridge Gerry, a politician, diplomat, Governor of the Commonwealth, signer of the Declaration, U.S. Representative, and Vice President; and James Russell Lowell, an author, poet, teacher, and statesman.

In 1767 Andrew Oliver, while serving as royal secretary of Massachusetts, erected the building. An ex-stamp tax collector and a firm Tory, he aroused the hatred of the Whigs, who on at least one occasion attacked his home. He died in 1774 while serving as royal Lieutenant Governor. Some time during the War for Independence, Oliver’s estate including the mansion, was confiscated.

In 1767, Andrew Oliver, who was the royal secretary of Massachusetts, built the structure. A former stamp tax collector and a staunch Tory, he stirred up the anger of the Whigs, who attacked his home at least once. He died in 1774 while holding the position of royal Lieutenant Governor. At some point during the War for Independence, Oliver’s estate, including the mansion, was taken over.

196

196

Elmwood.

In 1787 Elbridge Gerry, who the previous year had retired from business in Marblehead, Mass., moved to Cambridge and purchased the estate. He lived there for the rest of his long career in public service. In March 1813 he took the oath of office as Vice President in his home. Because of heavy debts, on his death in Washington, D.C., in 1814, his Cambridge residence remained his sole real estate holding.

In 1787, Elbridge Gerry, who had retired from his business in Marblehead, Mass., the year before, moved to Cambridge and bought the estate. He lived there for the remainder of his long career in public service. In March 1813, he took the oath of office as Vice President in his home. Due to significant debts, when he passed away in Washington, D.C., in 1814, his Cambridge residence was his only property.

The mansion was also the birthplace and lifelong home of James Russell Lowell (1819–91), one of the most distinguished men of letters of his era, as well as a prominent U.S. diplomat. Except during the period 1877–85, when he served as Minister to Spain and Great Britain, he lived at his birthplace, which he named “Elmwood.”

The mansion was also the birthplace and lifelong home of James Russell Lowell (1819–91), one of the most notable writers of his time, as well as a prominent U.S. diplomat. Except for the years 1877–85, when he served as Minister to Spain and Great Britain, he lived at his birthplace, which he called “Elmwood.”

Elmwood is a large, square, clapboarded-frame structure in Georgian style with brick-lined walls and two interior chimneys. The first- and second-story windows are topped by cornices. Above the foreshortened third-story windows, typical in three-story Georgian houses, runs a boldly modillioned cornice. A balustrade encloses the low-pitched hip roof. The most striking exterior feature, however, is the entranceway, which is flanked by Tuscan pilasters supporting a classic entablature decorated with a frieze. A large window rests197 on the entablature parapet motif and is flanked by Ionic pilasters and topped by a triangular pediment.

Elmwood is a large, square-frame building in Georgian style with brick-lined walls and two interior chimneys. The windows on the first and second floors have decorative cornices above them. A prominent cornice runs above the shortened third-story windows, which is typical in three-story Georgian homes. A balustrade surrounds the low-pitched hip roof. However, the most eye-catching feature of the exterior is the entrance, which is flanked by Tuscan pilasters that support a classic entablature decorated with a frieze. A large window sits on the entablature's parapet motif, flanked by Ionic pilasters and topped with a triangular pediment.197

A one-story porch with balustraded roof deck on the north side of the house, as well as a terrace on the south side, are later additions. Located in the rear, at the northwest corner, is a two-story service wing; in the rear, at the southwest corner, a one-story wing. Both of them are of frame construction. All three floors in the main section are bisected into two rooms on either side by a central hall. Portions of the interior have been altered and modernized.

A single-story porch with a railed roof deck on the north side of the house, along with a terrace on the south side, are later additions. At the rear, in the northwest corner, there's a two-story service wing; in the rear, at the southwest corner, is a one-story wing. Both are made of frame construction. The main section has three floors, each divided into two rooms on either side of a central hall. Parts of the interior have been changed and updated.

Donated to Harvard University in 1962 and now used as the presidential residence, Elmwood is not open to the public. The house and grounds are in fine condition.

Donated to Harvard University in 1962 and now serving as the presidential residence, Elmwood is not open to the public. The house and grounds are in excellent condition.


Gerry Birthplace, Massachusetts  ‎⊗

Location: Essex County, 44 Washington Street, Marblehead.

Location: Essex County, 44 Washington Street, Marblehead.

Elbridge Gerry was born in this framehouse and resided in it until 1787, when he moved to Cambridge, Mass. His father, Thomas, had built it about 1730, and it remained in possession of the Gerry family until 1820.

Elbridge Gerry was born in this frame house and lived there until 1787, when he moved to Cambridge, Mass. His father, Thomas, built it around 1730, and it stayed in the Gerry family's possession until 1820.

Architectural evidence strongly suggests that the L-shaped building was originally a two-story Georgian structure. About 1820 the two stories were apparently raised and a third one built underneath. Since that time, changes have been slight. The original interior finish of the first story is entirely 19th century, and the original paneling on the walls of the second story is clearly 18th century.

Architectural evidence strongly suggests that the L-shaped building was originally a two-story Georgian structure. Around 1820, the two stories were likely raised, and a third was built underneath. Since then, changes have been minimal. The original interior finish of the first story is entirely 19th century, and the original paneling on the walls of the second story is clearly 18th century.

Gerry Birthplace.

198 Today, the exterior is clapboarded. The long arm of the ell faces north toward the street. A central hall divides the first floor of the long arm into two rooms, the east and west parlors, both with 19th century mantels, fireplaces, and flanking arched alcoves. The west parlor opens into the short arm of the ell, which extends southward to the rear and contains the dining room. Attached to the rear of the short arm is a small rear service wing containing an L-shaped, one-story kitchen. A one-story open veranda runs around the east and south elevations of the long side of the ell, and a small porch flanks the dining room on its west side. The second story contains three bedrooms, all displaying the original 18th-century paneling on the fireplace walls. The third floor consists of four bedrooms.

198 Today, the outside is covered with clapboard. The long arm of the ell faces north toward the street. A central hall divides the first floor of the long arm into two rooms, the east and west parlors, both featuring 19th-century mantels, fireplaces, and arched alcoves on either side. The west parlor opens into the short arm of the ell, which extends southward to the back and includes the dining room. Attached to the back of the short arm is a small service wing with an L-shaped, one-story kitchen. A one-story open veranda wraps around the east and south sides of the long side of the ell, and a small porch sits on the west side of the dining room. The second floor has three bedrooms, all showcasing the original 18th-century paneling on the fireplace walls. The third floor consists of four bedrooms.

The house and grounds, privately owned and not open to the public, are well maintained.

The house and garden, privately owned and not accessible to the public, are kept in great condition.


Hancock-Clarke House, Massachusetts  ∆

Location: Middlesex County, 35 Hancock Street, Lexington.

Location: Middlesex County, 35 Hancock Street, Lexington.

The only extant residence associated with John Hancock, this was his boyhood home. In 1744, upon the death of his father at Quincy, the 7-year-old boy came to live at this house with his grandfather,199 Rev. John Hancock. In 1750 the lad joined his childless uncle, Thomas Hancock, a wealthy Boston merchant who adopted him.

The only remaining home linked to John Hancock, this was his childhood house. In 1744, after his father passed away in Quincy, the 7-year-old moved into this house with his grandfather, 199 Rev. John Hancock. In 1750, the boy joined his uncle, Thomas Hancock, a wealthy Boston merchant who adopted him.

Hancock-Clarke House.

By the time of the Revolution, Rev. Jonas Clarke, a relative by marriage of the Hancocks, occupied the house, which had been built as a parsonage by Rev. John Hancock. Clarke encouraged Revolutionaries to use his home as a meetingplace and refuge. On the evening of April 18, 1775, patriot leaders Hancock and Samuel Adams were visiting there. Around midnight, after everyone had gone to bed, Paul Revere and later William Dawes, warning the countryside of the approach of British troops, galloped up and informed the household. A few hours later, Hancock and Adams fled northward to Burlington, Mass. They later moved from place to place, staying away from Boston, until they proceeded to Philadelphia to attend the Continental Congress, which convened the next month.

By the time of the Revolution, Rev. Jonas Clarke, who was related by marriage to the Hancocks, lived in the house that had been built as a parsonage by Rev. John Hancock. Clarke encouraged Revolutionaries to use his home as a meeting place and safe haven. On the evening of April 18, 1775, patriot leaders Hancock and Samuel Adams were visiting. Around midnight, after everyone had gone to bed, Paul Revere and later William Dawes, warning the countryside about the approaching British troops, rode up and informed the household. A few hours later, Hancock and Adams escaped north to Burlington, Mass. They then moved from place to place, staying away from Boston, until they headed to Philadelphia to attend the Continental Congress, which would meet the following month.

The Hancock-Clarke House consists of two frame sections, erected by Rev. John Hancock at different times. The original one, built in 1698, presently forms the small rear ell, 1½ stories high with gambrel roof. A living room-kitchen and tiny study are located downstairs and two low-studded chambers upstairs. The 2½-story front, or main, section of the house dates from 1734 and was financed by Thomas Hancock for his father. It has a large central chimney and contains a short center hall and two rooms on each of the two floors.

The Hancock-Clarke House has two frame sections built by Rev. John Hancock at different times. The original section, constructed in 1698, currently serves as the small rear ell, which is 1½ stories tall and has a gambrel roof. There’s a living room-kitchen and a tiny study on the first floor, along with two low-ceiling bedrooms on the second floor. The front or main section of the house, which is 2½ stories high, was built in 1734 and funded by Thomas Hancock for his father. It features a large central chimney and includes a short center hall with two rooms on each of the two floors.

In 1896, when the building faced demolition, the Lexington Historical Society acquired it and moved it from across the street to its present location. In 1902 the society constructed a rear brick addition containing a fireproof vault to protect its more valuable possessions. Restored to its 18th-century appearance and well maintained, the Hancock-Clarke House is open to the public and serves as headquarters of the society. Recently the society purchased the original site of the house, where foundations are visible.

In 1896, when the building was about to be demolished, the Lexington Historical Society bought it and relocated it from across the street to its current spot. In 1902, the society built a brick addition at the back with a fireproof vault to safeguard its more valuable items. Restored to look like it did in the 18th century and well maintained, the Hancock-Clarke House is open to the public and serves as the society's headquarters. Recently, the society acquired the original site of the house, where the foundations can still be seen.


Bartlett House, New Hampshire  ∆

Location: Rockingham County, on the west side of N.H. 111, opposite the town hall, Kingston.

Location: Rockingham County, on the west side of N.H. 111, across from the Kingston town hall.

This is the only extant structure closely associated with Josiah Bartlett. He built it in 1774, after fire consumed his earlier home on the same site, and lived in it until his death in 1795.

This is the only existing structure closely linked to Josiah Bartlett. He built it in 1774, after a fire destroyed his earlier home on the same site, and lived in it until his death in 1795.

200

200

Bartlett House.

The rectangular frame residence is clapboarded and two stories in height. Two interior chimneys pierce the gabled roof. Exterior louvered shutters border the windows. Many of the house’s existing features date from the second third of the 19th century, when it was remodeled in the Greek Revival style. They include the giant corner pilasters; cornices over the first-story windows; the center door with cornice, sidelights, and pilasters; and the one-story porch across the south end of the structure. Another addition, at the southwest corner, was the two-story frame ell, which gave the building its present L-shape. This ell contains a summer kitchen and workroom on the first floor and four bedrooms on the second.

The rectangular house is made of clapboard and has two stories. Two interior chimneys rise through the gabled roof. The windows are framed with exterior louvered shutters. Many of the house's current features are from the mid-19th century when it was remodeled in the Greek Revival style. These features include the large corner pilasters, cornices above the first-floor windows, the center door with a cornice, sidelights, and pilasters, and the one-story porch at the south end of the building. An additional two-story frame section was added at the southwest corner, giving the building its current L-shape. This section has a summer kitchen and workroom on the first floor and four bedrooms on the second.

Center halls bisect the rooms on both stories of the main house into pairs. The downstairs hall is divided into two sections, each containing a stairway set against the north wall. To the south of the hall on the first floor are the living room and the dining room, originally the kitchen. These rooms are equipped with the original chimneys and fireplaces. North of the hall is a parlor and behind it a bedroom. Around 1860 the chimney for these rooms and the fireplace in the parlor were rebuilt, and two closets that flanked the parlor fireplace201 were converted into the existing arched alcoves. The second floor contains four bedrooms, two on each side of the central hall. The original wide floorboards are still in place throughout the residence.

Center halls split the rooms on both floors of the main house into pairs. The downstairs hall is divided into two sections, each with a stairway against the north wall. To the south of the hall on the first floor are the living room and the dining room, which was originally the kitchen. These rooms feature the original chimneys and fireplaces. North of the hall is a parlor, with a bedroom behind it. Around 1860, the chimney for these rooms and the fireplace in the parlor were rebuilt, and two closets that flanked the parlor fireplace201 were turned into the current arched alcoves. The second floor has four bedrooms, two on each side of the central hall. The original wide floorboards are still in place throughout the home.

The house, in excellent condition, is still in the possession of Bartlett descendants and is not open to the public. It has never been restored, but is furnished with some original Bartlett pieces, including a medical table and instruments.

The house, in great shape, is still owned by the Bartlett descendants and isn't open to the public. It has never been restored, but is furnished with some original Bartlett items, including a medical table and instruments.


Moffatt-Ladd House, New Hampshire  ∆

Location: Rockingham County, 154 Market Street, Portsmouth.

Location: Rockingham County, 154 Market Street, Portsmouth.

An outstanding example of a late Georgian mansion, this impressive three-story structure was the longtime residence of William Whipple. Ship carpenters constructed it in 1763 for John Moffatt, a sea captain and wealthy merchant. He presented it the following year as a wedding gift to his son, Samuel, a merchant-shipowner. In 1768,202 after the latter had failed in business and fled to the West Indies to escape creditors, Captain Moffatt reacquired it and lived in it for the rest of his life. Whipple and his wife, Catherine, Moffatt’s daughter, moved into the house the same year as the captain. Whipple resided there until his death in 1785; his wife and apparently his father-in-law, too, survived him.

An outstanding example of a late Georgian mansion, this impressive three-story building was the longtime home of William Whipple. Ship carpenters built it in 1763 for John Moffatt, a sea captain and wealthy merchant. He gave it the following year as a wedding gift to his son, Samuel, who was a merchant-shipowner. In 1768,202 after Samuel went bankrupt and fled to the West Indies to escape his creditors, Captain Moffatt got it back and lived in it for the rest of his life. Whipple and his wife, Catherine, Moffatt’s daughter, moved into the house the same year as the captain. Whipple lived there until his death in 1785; his wife and apparently his father-in-law also survived him.

Moffatt-Ladd House.

The square, clapboarded building stands on a slight elevation overlooking old Portsmouth Harbor. Noteworthy features of the elaborate exterior include white corner quoins and richly pedimented first- and second-floor windows. The third-story windows, smaller in size, abut the distinctive cornice. Side windows, like those on the third-floor front, lack pediments. Rear windows on the first two stories have flat arches with lengthened keystones. The hip roof, flanked by three end chimneys, is cut off to form a flat deck, or captain’s walk, which is enclosed by an attractive balustrade with urn finials. A delicate fence with large ornamental posts, also topped by urn finials, spans the front of the house, which is approached by a flight of granite steps that lead up to the portico-covered entranceway. Near the front northeast comer of the residence is the countinghouse, or office (1810), a small, square building with a hip roof.

The square, clapboard building sits on a slight hill overlooking old Portsmouth Harbor. Key features of the detailed exterior include white corner quoins and intricately topped first- and second-floor windows. The smaller third-story windows sit right below the unique cornice. The side windows, like those on the third floor at the front, don’t have pediments. The rear windows on the first two stories have flat arches with elongated keystones. The hip roof, flanked by three end chimneys, is trimmed off to create a flat deck, or captain’s walk, which is surrounded by a stylish balustrade with urn finials. A delicate fence with large decorative posts, also topped by urn finials, runs across the front of the house, which is accessed by a flight of granite steps leading up to the portico-covered entrance. Near the front northeast corner of the house is the countinghouse, or office (1810), a small square building with a hip roof.

The interior of the house is as highly embellished as the exterior. The outstanding room on the first floor is the unusually spacious entrance hall, one of the finest in New England. Its carved cornice is handsome, and the walls are covered with rare imported French wallpaper of the early 19th century. The beautiful and finely carved flight of stairs is lighted by a roundheaded window in the side wall above the landing. Except for the simple detail in the drawing room, that in other first-floor rooms—dining room and pantry—is rich. Four bedrooms are located on the second floor, and five additional chambers on the third. Three of the second-floor bedrooms have richly carved overmantels.

The inside of the house is just as lavishly decorated as the outside. The standout room on the first floor is the surprisingly spacious entrance hall, one of the best in New England. Its carved cornice is beautiful, and the walls are covered with rare imported French wallpaper from the early 19th century. The elegant and finely carved staircase is illuminated by a round-headed window in the side wall above the landing. With the exception of the simple details in the drawing room, the other first-floor rooms—like the dining room and pantry—are ornate. There are four bedrooms on the second floor, and five more rooms on the third. Three of the second-floor bedrooms have beautifully carved overmantels.

The carefully restored house and grounds were owned by the Ladd family, descendants of the Moffatts through marriage, until 1969. From 1913 until 1969, they leased the house to the Colonial Dames of America, which maintained it for public display. In 1969 the Colonial Dames acquired full title to the property. The first two floors of the house are furnished in period pieces, and the third floor is not open.

The carefully restored house and grounds were owned by the Ladd family, descendants of the Moffatts by marriage, until 1969. From 1913 until 1969, they rented the house to the Colonial Dames of America, who kept it open for public viewing. In 1969, the Colonial Dames gained full ownership of the property. The first two floors of the house are furnished with period furniture, and the third floor is not accessible.


203

203

Thornton House, New Hampshire  ∆

Location: Rockingham County, 2 Thornton Street, Derry Village.

Location: Rockingham County, 2 Thornton Street, Derry Village.

Matthew Thornton lived in this residence, which has since been considerably altered, during his medical and most of his political career. He probably acquired it in 1740, the year he moved from Worcester, Mass., to present Derry Village (then a part of Londonderry) to set up his medical practice. He resided in it until about 1780, when he retired as a doctor and moved to a farm near Merrimack, N.H.

Matthew Thornton lived in this house, which has changed a lot since then, during most of his medical and political career. He probably bought it in 1740, the year he moved from Worcester, Mass., to what is now Derry Village (then part of Londonderry) to start his medical practice. He lived there until around 1780, when he retired as a doctor and moved to a farm near Merrimack, N.H.

The gable roof of the two-story frame structure, of the saltbox type, slopes steeply to the rear, or north, and forms a one-story lean-to. Two interior chimneys sit behind the ridge of the roof. The exterior, remodeled in the Greek Revival style probably in the mid-19th century, features giant pilasters on the front corners and a one-story portico over the center door. The clapboarding is a replacement of the original. All windows, including those in the gable ends, have exterior louvered shutters, and flat cornices surmount those on the first floor. A one-story frame service ell, extending from the northwest corner and giving the house its present L-shape, contains the modernized kitchen and what were once workrooms for servants.

The gable roof of the two-story frame building, designed in the saltbox style, slopes steeply toward the back, or north side, creating a one-story lean-to. Two interior chimneys are located behind the peak of the roof. The exterior, updated in the Greek Revival style likely in the mid-19th century, features large pilasters at the front corners and a one-story porch above the center door. The clapboarding is a replacement for the original. All windows, including those in the gable ends, have exterior louvered shutters, and flat cornices are placed above the first-floor windows. A one-story frame service ell, extending from the northwest corner and giving the house its current L-shape, includes the updated kitchen and what were once servants' workrooms.

Thornton House.

204 Inside the house, a center hall bisects the rooms into two pairs and is divided into two sections, each with its own stairway on the east wall. To the east of the hall are the living room and modern laundry room; to the west, dining room and present family room. The two chimneys, built between the pairs of rooms to provide four fireplaces, one for each room, were rebuilt on a smaller scale in the early 19th century for use with Franklin stoves. Thus none of the original fireplaces and mantels exist any longer, but a 19th-century mantel remains in the dining room. The opposite fireplace in the family room, however, is modern. Features dating from the 18th century include the framing and wide floorboards, visible in all rooms except the family room where they are covered. The second floor contains three bedrooms.

204 Inside the house, a central hallway splits the rooms into two sets and is divided into two sections, each with its own staircase on the east wall. To the east of the hallway are the living room and a modern laundry room; to the west are the dining room and the current family room. The two chimneys, built between the pairs of rooms to provide four fireplaces—one for each room—were rebuilt on a smaller scale in the early 19th century for use with Franklin stoves. As a result, none of the original fireplaces and mantels remain, but a 19th-century mantel can still be found in the dining room. The fireplace opposite in the family room, however, is modern. Features from the 18th century include the framing and wide floorboards, which are visible in all rooms except the family room, where they are covered. The second floor has three bedrooms.

The Thornton House, in fair condition, is used as a private residence and is not open to the public. Its present owner hopes to restore it.

The Thornton House, in decent shape, is used as a private home and is not open to the public. Its current owner hopes to restore it.


Hopkinson House, New Jersey  ∆

Location: Burlington County, 101 Farnsworth Avenue, Bordentown.

Location: Burlington County, 101 Farnsworth Ave, Bordentown.

Owned by the Hopkinson family for several generations, this house was the residence of signer Francis Hopkinson from 1774 until his death in 1791. It was built in 1750 by merchant John Imlay (Emley), who used part of it as a store. Sometime before 1768 Joseph Borden, a prominent New Jersey citizen, acquired it. Hopkinson married his daughter at Philadelphia in 1768, and, after a tour as customs collector at New Castle, Del. (1772–74), moved to Bordentown and took up residence with his father-in-law.

Owned by the Hopkinson family for several generations, this house was the home of signer Francis Hopkinson from 1774 until his death in 1791. It was built in 1750 by merchant John Imlay (Emley), who used part of it as a store. Before 1768, Joseph Borden, a prominent New Jersey citizen, acquired it. Hopkinson married his daughter in Philadelphia in 1768, and after serving as customs collector in New Castle, Del. (1772–74), he moved to Bordentown and lived with his father-in-law.

Upon Hopkinson’s death, his eldest son, Joseph (1770–1842), inherited the house. He achieved fame as composer, lawyer, judge, and politician. Among his distinguished guests were Irish poet Thomas Moore, Thomas Paine, and Joseph Bonaparte, Napoleon’s brother. The Hopkinson family retained possession of the property until 1915; since then, it has been owned by the Wells family.

Upon Hopkinson’s death, his oldest son, Joseph (1770–1842), inherited the house. He became well-known as a composer, lawyer, judge, and politician. Some of his notable guests included Irish poet Thomas Moore, Thomas Paine, and Joseph Bonaparte, Napoleon’s brother. The Hopkinson family kept ownership of the property until 1915; since then, it has been owned by the Wells family.

The Hopkinson House is an L-shaped, brick and frame structure with a gambrel, dormered roof. The main 2½-story section is constructed of brick. The center door is topped by a rectangular transom, flanked by sidelights, and sheltered by a segmental hood. A central205 hall, divided into two sections by means of a wide folding door with an arched fanlight above, bisects the first floor into two large rooms, living room and library. Both of these are currently used by the Bordentown Chamber of Commerce as an office and museum, open to the public. The front portion of the central hall serves as an entrance hall; the rear section, as the stair hall. A narrow hall extends from the stair hall south across the rear of the main house. The second and third floors, each containing four bedrooms, are used as apartments.

The Hopkinson House is an L-shaped, brick and frame building with a gambrel roof and dormers. The main 2½-story part is made of brick. The front door is topped by a rectangular transom, with sidelights on either side, and has a segmental hood over it. A central205 hall, split into two sections by a wide folding door with an arched fanlight above, divides the first floor into two large rooms: the living room and library. These spaces are currently used by the Bordentown Chamber of Commerce as an office and museum, which is open to the public. The front part of the central hall acts as an entrance hall, while the back section serves as the stair hall. A narrow hall runs from the stair hall south across the back of the main house. The second and third floors, each having four bedrooms, are used as apartments.

Hopkinson House.

A two-story brick wing extends to the rear from the northeast corner of the main section. Its first-floor dining room and the two bedrooms comprising the second floor form an apartment unit. Attached to this wing at the rear of the brick arm is a two-story frame wing that once contained the kitchen and servant’s bedroom.

A two-story brick extension reaches out from the northeast corner of the main building. The dining room on the first floor and the two bedrooms on the second floor make up an apartment unit. Connected to this extension at the back of the brick section is a two-story frame wing that used to hold the kitchen and the servant’s bedroom.

The exterior of the house, except for the metal roof, appears to be little altered. Interior features are plastered walls, wide floorboards, and 19th-century mantels. Much of the original woodwork and trim has apparently been replaced, but the basic floor plan has not been greatly changed. The residence is in good condition.

The outside of the house, aside from the metal roof, looks mostly the same. Inside, there are plastered walls, wide floorboards, and 19th-century mantels. A lot of the original woodwork and trim seems to have been replaced, but the basic layout hasn’t changed much. The house is in good shape.


206

206

Maybury Hill, New Jersey  ∆

Location: Mercer County, 346 Snowden Lane, Princeton.

Location: Mercer County, 346 Snowden Lane, Princeton.

Maybury Hill, built about 1725, was the birthplace and boyhood home of North Carolina signer Joseph Hewes. His father leased it from 1730 until 1755.

Maybury Hill, built around 1725, was the birthplace and childhood home of North Carolina signer Joseph Hewes. His father rented it from 1730 until 1755.

The house provides a fine example of Georgian architecture. It was originally a small, two-story stone structure with gable roof. A short distance away, at the northeast corner, stood a detached kitchen building. In 1735, following a fire, the main house was rebuilt. In 1753 a major addition was made on the north side connecting it with the kitchen building. This resulted in an L-shaped, two-story structure with gabled roof and three end chimneys. The only alteration of consequence since that time occurred about 1900, when the fieldstone exterior walls were covered with concrete.

The house is a great example of Georgian architecture. It was originally a small, two-story stone building with a gabled roof. Not far away, at the northeast corner, was a separate kitchen building. In 1735, after a fire, the main house was rebuilt. In 1753, a major expansion was added to the north side, connecting it to the kitchen building. This created an L-shaped, two-story structure with a gabled roof and three chimneys at the ends. The only significant change since then happened around 1900, when the fieldstone exterior walls were covered in concrete.

Flat brick arches top the windows. Second-story windows have exterior louvered shutters; those on the first, paneled shutters. Today the house has a center hall floor plan. To the south of the hall is the large parlor, which dates from 1725. To the north are the dining and living rooms, added in 1753. Both of them have paneled walls, shell cabinets, and exposed ceiling beams. The kitchen, dating from 1725, is still in the northeast corner of the building. The dining room fireplace is faced with tile. Four bedrooms occupy the upstairs. All the floors are constructed of wide boards.

Flat brick arches sit above the windows. The second-story windows have exterior louvered shutters, while the first-floor ones feature paneled shutters. Today, the house has a center hall floor plan. To the south of the hall is the large parlor, which dates back to 1725. To the north are the dining and living rooms, added in 1753. Both have paneled walls, shell cabinets, and exposed ceiling beams. The kitchen, also from 1725, is still in the northeast corner of the building. The dining room fireplace is covered with tile. There are four bedrooms upstairs. All the floors are made of wide boards.

Little-altered Maybury Hill was renovated in 1920, and is still in excellent condition. A private residence, it is not open to visitors.

Little-altered Maybury Hill was renovated in 1920 and is still in excellent condition. As a private residence, it is not open to visitors.

Maybury Hill.

207

207

Morven, New Jersey  ∆

Location: Mercer County, 55 Stockton Street, Princeton.

Location: Mercer County, 55 Stockton Street, Princeton.

Morven was the birthplace and lifelong home of Richard Stockton (1730–81). In the summer of 1783 it was also the official residence of his brother-in-law Elias Boudinot, President of the Continental Congress, which was then meeting in Princeton. That same year, many Revolutionary leaders gathered at the mansion to celebrate the signing of the Treaty of Paris, which ended the War for Independence.

Morven was the birthplace and lifelong home of Richard Stockton (1730–81). In the summer of 1783, it also served as the official residence of his brother-in-law Elias Boudinot, President of the Continental Congress, which was meeting in Princeton at that time. That same year, many Revolutionary leaders gathered at the mansion to celebrate the signing of the Treaty of Paris, which marked the end of the War for Independence.

Between 1701 and 1709 Stockton’s grandfather, also named Richard, built the earliest section of Morven. It grew in a series of stages until about 1775, when its exterior appearance approximated that of today. Because fires in 1776, set by the British during the War for Independence, and 1821 necessitated extensive repairs, the interior dates from the late 18th or early 19th century.

Between 1701 and 1709, Stockton’s grandfather, also named Richard, constructed the earliest part of Morven. It developed in several phases until around 1775, when its exterior looked similar to how it appears today. The fires in 1776, caused by the British during the War for Independence, and in 1821 required significant repairs, so the interior is from the late 18th or early 19th century.

Morven.

A large Georgian mansion of brick, Morven consists of three sections: a main central, two-story section over a raised basement and two lower, attached, two-story wings. The facade of the main section, although basically early Georgian in style, was altered in the 19th century by the addition of a wide, one-story, Greek Revival porch. A central hall divides the section into a large dining room and the Gold Room. Fireplace walls in these rooms are fully paneled. The central hall intersects a stair hall, which runs across the rear of the main portion of the house and connects with the two wings. On the first floor of the east wing are two large family rooms, the Red Room and library. This wing was partially burned208 by the British. The west service wing includes the kitchen. The only recent change, in 1945–54, was the addition of a solarium, or Green Room, at the rear of the main section; a one-story porch was enclosed to form the new room.

A large Georgian brick mansion, Morven has three parts: a main central section that’s two stories with a raised basement, and two lower, attached two-story wings. The front of the main section, while it has an early Georgian style, was changed in the 19th century with the addition of a wide, one-story Greek Revival porch. A central hall splits the section into a spacious dining room and the Gold Room. The fireplace walls in both rooms are fully paneled. The central hall connects with a stair hall that runs along the back of the main part of the house and links to the two wings. On the first floor of the east wing, there are two large family rooms: the Red Room and the library. This wing was partially burned208 by the British. The west service wing includes the kitchen. The only recent update, from 1945–54, was the addition of a solarium, or Green Room, at the back of the main section; a one-story porch was enclosed to create the new room.

Morven remained in possession of the Stockton family until 1945, when Gov. and Mrs. Walter E. Edge acquired it. Nine years later, they donated it to the State of New Jersey. Since that time, it has been the official residence of the Governor. It is not accessible to the public.

Morven stayed with the Stockton family until 1945, when Governor and Mrs. Walter E. Edge bought it. Nine years later, they gave it to the State of New Jersey. Since then, it has been the official residence of the Governor. It is not open to the public.


President’s House, New Jersey  ∆

Location: Mercer County, on Nassau Street just northwest of Nassau Hall, on the Princeton University campus, Princeton.

Location: Mercer County, on Nassau Street just northwest of Nassau Hall, within the Princeton University campus, Princeton.

From 1756 until 1879 this house was the official residence of the president of the College of New Jersey (Princeton University after 1896). In 1768, when John Witherspoon emigrated from Scotland to America to assume the presidency, he occupied it. While living there, he represented New Jersey in the Continental Congress and signed the Declaration. In 1779 he moved to his nearby farm, Tusculum. From then until 1794 his son-in-law Samuel S. Smith, vice president of the college, resided in the President’s House. From 1879 until 1968 it was the home of the Dean of the Faculty and was known as the “Dean’s House.” Since 1968, it has been called the Maclean House and has been used by the Princeton Alumni Council.

From 1756 to 1879, this house served as the official residence of the president of the College of New Jersey (now Princeton University, since 1896). In 1768, when John Witherspoon moved from Scotland to America to take on the presidency, he lived here. During his time there, he represented New Jersey in the Continental Congress and signed the Declaration of Independence. In 1779, he relocated to his nearby farm, Tusculum. From then until 1794, his son-in-law Samuel S. Smith, who was the vice president of the college, lived in the President’s House. From 1879 to 1968, it was the home of the Dean of the Faculty and was referred to as the “Dean’s House.” Since 1968, it has been called the Maclean House and has been used by the Princeton Alumni Council.

President’s House.

209 The Georgian building was designed and constructed in 1756 by Robert Smith, a master carpenter of Philadelphia. Both on the exterior and the interior, it has changed only slightly throughout the years. It was originally a two-story brick structure, rectangular in shape, with gable roof. A one-story polygonal bay extends westward from the rear southwest comer. Near the same corner, a two-story service wing of brick and stone runs southward. Above the windows of the main facade are flat stone winged arches with keystones. Over the center door is a fanlight surmounted by a triangular pediment. The exterior has retained its original appearance and arrangement except that small double dormers were later inserted in the center of the front and rear roofs to create a third level. Additions in 1868 were a wide one-story frame porch on the front of the residence and a one-story frame, polygonal bay on the east side near the northeast front corner.

209 The Georgian building was designed and built in 1756 by Robert Smith, a master carpenter from Philadelphia. It has changed only slightly over the years, both inside and out. Originally, it was a two-story brick structure, rectangular in shape, with a gable roof. A one-story polygonal bay extends westward from the rear southwest corner. Near that corner, a two-story service wing made of brick and stone runs southward. Above the windows on the main facade are flat stone winged arches with keystones. A fanlight sits above the center door, topped by a triangular pediment. The exterior has kept its original look and layout, except that small double dormers were added later in the center of the front and rear roofs to create a third level. Additions in 1868 included a wide one-story frame porch at the front of the house and a one-story frame polygonal bay on the east side near the northeast front corner.

The center door opens into a central hall that extends through the house to rear stairs, against the east wall. To the east of the hall are a library and study. The fireplace wall in the library is fully paneled. To the west of the hall are a parlor and dining room. The second floor of the main house contains four bedrooms; the third floor, three additional rooms. Two bedrooms are located on the second floor of the service wing. In excellent condition, the house is open to the public.

The center door opens into a main hall that runs through the house to the back stairs on the east wall. To the east of the hall are a library and a study. The fireplace wall in the library is completely paneled. To the west of the hall are a parlor and a dining room. The second floor of the main house has four bedrooms; the third floor has three more rooms. Two bedrooms are located on the second floor of the service wing. In great shape, the house is open to the public.


Tusculum, New Jersey  ‎⊗

Location: Mercer County, 166 Cherry Hill Road, Princeton.

Location: Mercer County, 166 Cherry Hill Road, Princeton.

John Witherspoon made this his home from 1779 until his death in 1794. In 1773, while serving as president of the College of New Jersey (later Princeton University), he acquired some farmland near Princeton and built Tusculum. For several years he leased out the house and farm, but in 1779 he moved from the President’s House to Tusculum.

John Witherspoon lived here from 1779 until he passed away in 1794. In 1773, while he was president of the College of New Jersey (now Princeton University), he bought some farmland near Princeton and built Tusculum. For a number of years, he rented out the house and farm, but in 1779, he moved from the President’s House to Tusculum.

The two-story Georgian structure of fieldstone with gabled roof and two pairs of end chimneys originally had only one extension, a lower, two-story, stone and frame wing attached to the west end of the house along its main axis. First-story windows of both sections have exterior paneled shutters; second-story windows, louvered210 shutters. In later years, two additional wings, both of frame and two stories in height, were added to the east and west ends of the structure. Designed in the same style as the rest of the house, they do not seriously alter the original appearance of the front elevation.

The two-story Georgian building made of fieldstone, featuring a gabled roof and two pairs of end chimneys, initially had only one extension: a lower, two-story stone and frame wing added to the west end of the house along its main axis. The first-story windows of both sections have exterior paneled shutters, while the second-story windows have louvered shutters.210 In later years, two more wings, both frame and two stories high, were added to the east and west ends of the structure. Designed in the same style as the rest of the house, they do not significantly change the original look of the front elevation.

Tusculum.

The stairway is located in an ell at the rear portion of the center hall along the east wall. To the east of the hall lie the living room and study; to the west, a large dining room, which occupies the entire west half of the main house. Four bedrooms are upstairs. The finish in two of them date from about 1825. The original service wing, on the west side, contains a kitchen on the first floor and two bedrooms on the second.

The stairway is situated in an extension at the back of the center hall along the east wall. To the east of the hall are the living room and study; to the west is a large dining room that takes up the entire west half of the main house. There are four bedrooms upstairs. The finishes in two of them date back to around 1825. The original service wing on the west side includes a kitchen on the first floor and two bedrooms on the second.

Tusculum has never undergone any major alterations and it is in excellent condition. In 1924 the present owner acquired it. Under his supervision, a Philadelphia firm restored it to its 18th-century appearance. The major changes were the removal of 19th-century porches at the front, or south, and elimination of a partition wall in the dining room. The structure continues to serve as a private residence and is not shown to visitors.

Tusculum has never experienced any major changes and is in great shape. The current owner bought it in 1924. With his oversight, a Philadelphia company restored it to its 18th-century look. The main updates included taking down the 19th-century porches at the front (or south side) and removing a dividing wall in the dining room. The building still functions as a private home and is not open to visitors.


Floyd Birthplace (Fire Island National Seashore), New York  ‎☑

Location: Suffolk County, 20 Washington Avenue, Mastic, Long Island; address: Fire Island National Seashore, P.O. Box 229, Patchogue, N.Y. 11772.

Location: Suffolk County, 20 Washington Avenue, Mastic, Long Island; address: Fire Island National Seashore, P.O. Box 229, Patchogue, NY 11772.

This farmhouse, which stood on a large estate the Floyd family had acquired in 1718, was the birthplace in 1734 of William Floyd and211 his residence for the greater part of his life—though he and his family were forced to abandon it in the period 1776–83 and flee to Middletown, Conn. During that time, British troops and Loyalists considerably damaged the estate. In 1803 Floyd presented the house to his son Nicoll and moved to present Westernville, N.Y.

This farmhouse, which was built on a large estate the Floyd family acquired in 1718, was where William Floyd was born in 1734 and where he lived for most of his life—although he and his family had to leave it between 1776 and 1783 and escape to Middletown, Conn. During that time, British troops and Loyalists caused significant damage to the estate. In 1803, Floyd gave the house to his son Nicoll and moved to what is now Westernville, N.Y.

Floyd Birthplace.

The earliest section of the large, frame Georgian building, which was enlarged several times along its west side during the 18th century, dates from about 1724. The structure now consists of a two-story main section and three wings. The former, entered through a Dutch door, is laid out in central hall fashion. To the west of the hall are a parlor and back of that an office; to the east, a dining room, behind which are a gunroom and pantry side by side. Interesting features on the first floor are exposed ceiling beams and wide floorboards. Seven bedrooms occupy the second floor.

The oldest part of the large Georgian building, which was expanded several times on its west side during the 18th century, dates back to around 1724. The building now has a two-story main section and three wings. The main entrance, accessed through a Dutch door, opens into a central hall. To the west of the hall, there’s a parlor, and behind that is an office; to the east, there’s a dining room, with a gunroom and pantry located next to each other behind it. Notable features on the first floor include exposed ceiling beams and wide floorboards. The second floor has seven bedrooms.

Extending from the rear of the central hall is a two-story north service wing, probably added about 1900. A 1½-story east service wing, with a dormered, gable roof, dates from the 18th century. At the rear, or to the north, of this wing, is a third service wing, 1½ stories high. It contained the original kitchen and was once located at the west end of the main house. Except for this relocation and the addition of the north wing, the main house and east wing are basically unchanged from their 18th-century appearance. The overall structure is in good condition and is furnished with many original pieces belonging to the Floyd family.

Extending from the back of the central hall is a two-story north service wing, likely added around 1900. A 1½-story east service wing, featuring a dormered gable roof, dates back to the 18th century. At the back, or to the north, of this wing is a third service wing, also 1½ stories high. It housed the original kitchen and was once at the west end of the main house. Aside from this relocation and the addition of the north wing, the main house and east wing remain largely unchanged from their 18th-century look. The overall structure is in good shape and is filled with many original pieces that belonged to the Floyd family.

212 In 1965 Floyd descendants donated 613 acres of the estate to the U.S. Government for inclusion in Fire Island National Seashore, but retained use and occupational rights to 43 acres and the house for a period of 25 years. Thus the residence will not be open to the public until 1990.

212 In 1965, the Floyd family donated 613 acres of the estate to the U.S. Government to include it in Fire Island National Seashore, but they kept the use and occupancy rights to 43 acres and the house for 25 years. Therefore, the residence won't be open to the public until 1990.


General Floyd House, New York  ∆

Location: Oneida County, on the west side of Main Street opposite Gilford Hill Road, Westernville.

Location: Oneida County, on the west side of Main Street, facing Gilford Hill Road, Westernville.

William Floyd lived in this home from 1803 until his death in 1821. In 1784 he had begun purchasing frontier land near present Rome in western New York, and 3 years later the State granted him 10,240 acres in the same area. During the summers, he visited and developed his tracts. In 1803, nearly 70 years of age, he deeded his residence at present Mastic, on Long Island, N.Y., to his son Nicoll and moved the rest of his family to present Westernville, where he constructed this farmhouse. He spent the remainder of his life farming and improving his wilderness lands.

William Floyd lived in this house from 1803 until he died in 1821. In 1784, he started buying frontier land near what is now Rome in western New York, and three years later, the State granted him 10,240 acres in the same area. During the summers, he visited and developed his land. In 1803, nearly 70 years old, he transferred his home in what is now Mastic, Long Island, NY, to his son Nicoll and moved the rest of his family to what is now Westernville, where he built this farmhouse. He spent the rest of his life farming and improving his wilderness land.

General Floyd House.

Constructed of frame, the Georgian-style residence consists of a large, two-story main section with gable roof and a lower, two-story service wing attached to the west end. A center door, flanked by a pair of small windows, opens into a central hall that extends through the house to another door on the north side. The stairs are set against the west wall of the hall. To the east of the hall are213 two large parlors containing cupboards and paneled fireplace walls. To the west of the hall is a dining room and behind that a study. The rooms have plastered walls and ceilings and wide floorboards. Four bedrooms occupy the second floor, and the attic is unfinished. The service wing, which includes the kitchen, is located to the west of the dining room.

Constructed with a frame, the Georgian-style house features a large, two-story main section with a gable roof and a shorter, two-story service wing attached to the west side. A center door, flanked by a pair of small windows, leads into a central hall that runs through the house to another door on the north side. The stairs are positioned against the west wall of the hall. To the east of the hall are two spacious parlors with cupboards and paneled fireplace walls. To the west of the hall is a dining room, followed by a study. The rooms have plastered walls and ceilings and wide floorboards. Four bedrooms are situated on the second floor, and the attic isn't finished. The service wing, which includes the kitchen, is located to the west of the dining room.

The structure, unaltered except for metal roofs and modern plumbing, is in excellent condition. It remained in the possession of Floyd descendants until 1956. Still privately owned, it is not open to the public.

The structure, unchanged except for metal roofs and modern plumbing, is in great condition. It stayed in the hands of Floyd's descendants until 1956. Now still privately owned, it is not open to the public.


Iredell House, North Carolina  ‎⊗

Location: Chowan County, 107 East Church Street, Edenton.

Location: Chowan County, 107 East Church Street, Edenton.

Early in 1798, in a state of extreme mental anguish because of mounting debts brought on by unwise speculation in lands, James Wilson, probably while visiting North Carolina on Federal circuit court matters, took refuge in this house. It was the home of his friend and fellow U.S. Supreme Court Justice James Iredell. Within a few months, Wilson died there.

Early in 1798, suffering from intense mental distress due to increasing debts caused by poor land investments, James Wilson, likely during a trip to North Carolina for Federal circuit court matters, sought solace in this house. It belonged to his friend and fellow U.S. Supreme Court Justice James Iredell. A few months later, Wilson passed away there.

Iredell House.

214 The little-altered Iredell House is a large L-shaped structure. It is constructed of frame and is two stories in height with gable roof. Two-story verandas span the front, or south, and rear elevations of the long arm of the ell. The building was erected in three stages. The earliest, the present short, or east, arm of the ell, was built in 1759 by John Wilkins, with its narrow gable end fronting on the street. In 1776 Joseph Whedbee enlarged the structure by adding to its west side the two easternmost bays of the present five-bay long arm. In 1810 Iredell’s widow extended the arm by three bays to its present size and added the verandas.

214 The mostly unchanged Iredell House is a large L-shaped building. It's made of wood and has two stories with a gabled roof. Two-story porches stretch across the front, or south side, and the back of the long part of the structure. The building was built in three phases. The oldest part, the current short east side of the ell, was constructed in 1759 by John Wilkins, with its narrow gabled end facing the street. In 1776, Joseph Whedbee expanded the structure by adding the two easternmost sections of the current five-bay long side to the west. In 1810, Iredell’s widow extended the long side by three bays to its current size and added the porches.

The original section of the house contains a living room and one other room on the first floor and two bedrooms on the second. The first floor of the 1776 section consists of the dining room; the second floor, a large bedroom. These two sections are furnished as a historic house museum and are open to the public. The remaining section of the long arm, dating from 1810, serves as the caretaker’s quarters. The State owns and administers the residence.

The original part of the house includes a living room and another room on the first floor, along with two bedrooms on the second floor. The first floor of the 1776 section has a dining room, while the second floor features a large bedroom. These two sections are set up as a historic house museum and are open to the public. The remaining part of the long arm, built in 1810, is used as the caretaker’s quarters. The State owns and manages the residence.


Nash-Hooper House, North Carolina  ∆

Location: Orange County, 118 West Tryon Street, Hillsborough.

Location: Orange County, 118 West Tryon Street, Hillsborough.

The Nash-Hooper House is the only extant residence that can be associated with William Hooper and is the only surviving home of a signer in the State. It was built in 1772 by Francis Nash, who later attained the rank of brigadier general in the Continental Army and lost his life in the War for Independence. In 1782, after the British had driven Hooper into hiding and destroyed his estate Finian near Wilmington, he moved to Hillsborough, where his family had fled. He purchased the Nash-Hooper House and resided in it until his death in 1790. Subsequently, from 1869 until 1875, it was the home of William A. Graham, former Governor of North Carolina.

The Nash-Hooper House is the only existing residence linked to William Hooper and the only remaining home of a signatory in the state. It was built in 1772 by Francis Nash, who eventually became a brigadier general in the Continental Army and lost his life in the War for Independence. In 1782, after the British forced Hooper into hiding and destroyed his estate, Finian, near Wilmington, he moved to Hillsborough, where his family had taken refuge. He bought the Nash-Hooper House and lived there until his death in 1790. Later, from 1869 to 1875, it was home to William A. Graham, a former Governor of North Carolina.

The original portion of the rectangular, two-story house was constructed with a braced oak frame that was held together by pegs and pins. It rests on shale foundations over an elevated basement, in which are located two rooms and a center hall. The roof is gabled, with a chimney at each end. A one-story, frame, “sitting room” (later dining room) wing, added in 1819 on a log base, extends from the rear, or north, of the house and creates its present L-shape.215 Weatherboarded siding covers both sides of the wing and the front of the main section. All the windows are flanked with exterior louvered shutters. The one-story porch spanning the front of the house dates from the late 19th century. A detached kitchen, erected in 1819 just east of the house adjacent to the storeroom and dining room in the north wing, was demolished in 1908. Sometime during the period 1939–59, the dining room in the north wing was converted into the present kitchen, and bathrooms were installed in the residence.

The original part of the rectangular two-story house was built with a braced oak frame held together by pegs and pins. It sits on shale foundations above an elevated basement, which includes two rooms and a central hall. The roof is gabled, with a chimney at each end. A one-story frame "sitting room" (later the dining room) wing, added in 1819 on a log base, extends from the back, or north, side of the house and gives it its current L-shape.215 Weatherboard siding covers both sides of the wing and the front of the main section. All the windows have exterior louvered shutters. The one-story porch spanning the front of the house dates from the late 19th century. A detached kitchen, built in 1819 just east of the house next to the storeroom and dining room in the north wing, was torn down in 1908. At some point between 1939 and 1959, the dining room in the north wing was turned into the current kitchen, and bathrooms were added to the house.

Nash-Hooper House.

The center hall of the main house is divided into two sections by means of an arch near the rear. West of the hall are a large library and a small study or bedroom; to the east, a large parlor and in the rear corner a narrow, lateral stair hall, with the stairs set against the north wall. Three bedrooms are located on the second floor, and the attic is unfinished. Wide floorboards are exposed throughout most of the main house. An original pine mantel remains in the dining room.

The main house has a center hall that’s split into two sections by an archway near the back. To the west of the hall, there’s a big library and a small study or bedroom; to the east, there’s a spacious parlor and in the back corner, a narrow stair hall, with the stairs positioned against the north wall. Three bedrooms are on the second floor, and the attic isn’t finished. Most of the main house features wide exposed floorboards. An original pine mantel is still in the dining room.

Although the little-altered Nash-Hooper House is structurally sound, it has never been restored, and extensive painting and plastering216 will be required to return it to good condition. It is privately owned and is not open to the public.

Although the minimally changed Nash-Hooper House is structurally sound, it has never been restored, and extensive painting and plastering216 will be needed to bring it back to good condition. It is privately owned and not open to the public.

Hooper was buried to the east of his home in the garden. That part of the garden was later absorbed by the town cemetery, behind the Presbyterian Church. In 1894 Hooper’s remains were reinterred at Guilford Courthouse National Military Park, N.C., though his original gravestone remains in the Hillsborough cemetery.

Hooper was buried to the east of his house in the garden. That part of the garden was later incorporated into the town cemetery, behind the Presbyterian Church. In 1894, Hooper’s remains were moved to Guilford Courthouse National Military Park, N.C., although his original gravestone is still in the Hillsborough cemetery.


Independence National Historical Park, Pennsylvania  ‎☑

Location: Philadelphia County, in downtown Philadelphia; address: 313 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19106.

Location: Philadelphia County, in downtown Philadelphia; address: 313 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

This park in the old part of Philadelphia is not only preeminent among the sites associated with the signers of the Declaration of Independence, but also notably commemorates other major aspects217 of the Nation’s founding and initial growth and many momentous national events. These include meetings of the First and Second Continental Congresses; adoption and signing of the Declaration, which marked the creation of the United States; and the labors of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which perpetuated it. As historian Carl Van Doren has said: “On account of the Declaration of Independence, [Independence Hall] is a shrine honored wherever the rights of man are honored. On account of the Constitution, it is a shrine cherished wherever the principles of self-government on a federal scale are cherished.”

This park in the historic part of Philadelphia is not only a top site linked to the signers of the Declaration of Independence, but it also commemorates other significant aspects217 of the nation’s founding and early growth, along with many important national events. These include the meetings of the First and Second Continental Congresses, the adoption and signing of the Declaration that created the United States, and the efforts of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that established it. As historian Carl Van Doren said: “Because of the Declaration of Independence, [Independence Hall] is a shrine honored wherever the rights of man are recognized. Because of the Constitution, it is a shrine valued wherever the principles of self-government on a federal scale are upheld.”

Independence Hall.

Independence Hall was originally the State House for the Province of Pennsylvania. In 1729 the provincial assembly set aside funds for the building, designed by lawyer Andrew Hamilton. Three years later, construction began under the supervision of master carpenter Edmund Wooley. In 1736 the assembly moved into the statehouse, which was not fully completed until 1756.

Independence Hall was originally the State House for the Province of Pennsylvania. In 1729, the provincial assembly allocated funds for the building, which was designed by lawyer Andrew Hamilton. Three years later, construction started under the supervision of master carpenter Edmund Wooley. In 1736, the assembly moved into the statehouse, which wasn't fully completed until 1756.

As American opposition to British colonial policies mounted, Philadelphia became a center of organized protest. To decide on a unified course of action, in 1774 the First Continental Congress met in newly finished Carpenters’ Hall, whose erection the Carpenters’ Company of Philadelphia had begun 4 years earlier. In 1775 the Second Continental Congress, taking over the east room of the ground floor of the statehouse from the Pennsylvania assembly, moved from protest to resistance. Warfare had already begun in Massachusetts. Congress created an Army and appointed George Washington as commander in chief. Yet the final break with the Crown had not come; not until a year later would independence be declared.

As American opposition to British colonial policies grew, Philadelphia became a hub for organized protest. In 1774, the First Continental Congress met in the newly completed Carpenters’ Hall, which the Carpenters’ Company of Philadelphia had started building four years earlier. In 1775, the Second Continental Congress took over the east room on the ground floor of the statehouse from the Pennsylvania Assembly and shifted from protest to resistance. Warfare had already begun in Massachusetts. Congress established an Army and appointed George Washington as commander in chief. However, the final break with the Crown hadn’t happened yet; it wouldn't be until a year later that independence would be declared.

On July 2, 1776, Congress passed Richard Henry Lee’s resolution of June 7 recommending independence. The Delegates then turned their attention to Thomas Jefferson’s draft of the Declaration, which had been submitted on June 28. After modification, it was adopted on July 4. Four days later, in Independence Square, the document was first read publicly, to the citizens of Philadelphia. In a formal ceremony on August 2, about 50 of the 56 signers affixed their signatures to the Declaration; the others apparently did so later.

On July 2, 1776, Congress approved Richard Henry Lee’s resolution from June 7 suggesting independence. The Delegates then focused on Thomas Jefferson’s draft of the Declaration, which was submitted on June 28. After some changes, it was officially adopted on July 4. Four days later, in Independence Square, the document was read publicly for the first time to the people of Philadelphia. In a formal event on August 2, about 50 of the 56 signers added their signatures to the Declaration; the others reportedly did so later.

Long, hard years of war ensued. In the late autumn and winter of 1776–77, the British threatened Philadelphia and Congress moved to Baltimore. Again in the fall of 1777 it departed, this time for218 York, Pa. During the British occupation of Philadelphia that winter and the next spring, the redcoats used Independence Hall as a barracks and as a hospital for American prisoners. In the summer of 1778, the Government returned. On November 3, 1781, Congress officially received news of Cornwallis’ surrender at Yorktown. Independence practically had been won.

Long, tough years of war followed. In the late autumn and winter of 1776–77, the British threatened Philadelphia, prompting Congress to move to Baltimore. Once again in the fall of 1777, it relocated, this time to York, Pa. During the British occupation of Philadelphia that winter and the following spring, the redcoats used Independence Hall as a barracks and a hospital for American prisoners. In the summer of 1778, the government returned. On November 3, 1781, Congress officially received the news of Cornwallis’ surrender at Yorktown. Independence was practically secured.

Earlier that same year, the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union had gone into effect. Under the Confederation, Congress stayed in Philadelphia until 1783, and later met in other cities. In 1787 the Constitutional Convention also held its highly secret sessions in Independence Hall, in the same chamber in which the Declaration had been adopted.

Earlier that same year, the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union had gone into effect. Under the Confederation, Congress stayed in Philadelphia until 1783, and later met in other cities. In 1787, the Constitutional Convention also held its highly secret sessions in Independence Hall, in the same chamber where the Declaration had been adopted.

About the same time that Philadelphia became the second Capital (1790–1800) under the Constitution, after the Government had moved from New York City, Independence Hall acquired three new neighbors in Independence Square: City Hall (1791), on the east; County Court House (1789), on the west; and American Philosophical Society Hall, on the southeast. Beginning in 1790, Congress met in the County Court House (subsequently known as Congress Hall). The following year, after sitting for a few days in Independence Hall, the U.S. Supreme Court moved to City Hall. In 1793 George Washington was inaugurated for his second term as President in Congress Hall, and 4 years later President Adams also took his oath of office there.

About the same time that Philadelphia became the second Capital (1790–1800) under the Constitution, after the Government moved from New York City, Independence Hall gained three new neighbors in Independence Square: City Hall (1791) to the east; County Court House (1789) to the west; and American Philosophical Society Hall to the southeast. Starting in 1790, Congress met in the County Court House (later known as Congress Hall). The next year, after meeting for a few days in Independence Hall, the U.S. Supreme Court relocated to City Hall. In 1793, George Washington was inaugurated for his second term as President in Congress Hall, and 4 years later, President Adams also took his oath of office there.

In 1799 the State government vacated Independence Hall and moved to Lancaster. The next year, the Federal Government relocated to Washington, D.C. The city of Philadelphia then used City Hall and Congress Hall, and various tenants occupied Independence Hall until the city acquired it in 1818. For example, during the period 1802–27 artist Charles Willson Peale operated a museum there. He and his son painted many of the signers and heroes of the War for Independence. These portraits form the nucleus of the park’s present collection, which is exhibited in the Second Bank of the United States Building; a special room is devoted to the signers.

In 1799, the State government left Independence Hall and moved to Lancaster. The following year, the Federal Government relocated to Washington, D.C. Philadelphia then used City Hall and Congress Hall, while various tenants occupied Independence Hall until the city took ownership of it in 1818. For instance, from 1802 to 1827, artist Charles Willson Peale ran a museum there. He and his son painted many of the signers and heroes of the War for Independence. These portraits are the core of the park’s current collection, which is displayed in the Second Bank of the United States Building; there is a special room dedicated to the signers.

Stately and symmetrical Independence Hall, a 2½-story red brick structure that has been carefully restored, is the most beautiful 18th-century public building of Georgian style in the United States. The tall belltower, reconstructed along the original lines in 1828 by architect William Strickland, dominates the south facade. Smaller219 two-story, hip-roofed, brick wings, erected in 1736 and 1739 and restored in 1897–98, one of which serves as a park information center, are connected to the main building by arcades.

Independence Hall is an impressive, symmetrical 2½-story red brick building that has been carefully restored. It's widely regarded as the most beautiful 18th-century public building in Georgian style in the United States. The tall belltower, rebuilt in 1828 by architect William Strickland to match the original design, stands out on the south side. Smaller two-story, hip-roofed brick wings, built in 1736 and 1739 and restored in 1897–98—one of which functions as a park information center—are linked to the main building by arcades.

Independence Hall in 1778.

The interior focus of interest in Independence Hall is the Assembly Room, the eastern one on the first floor. Probably no other room in the United States has been the scene of such political courage and wisdom. In this chamber, members of the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention formulated and signed the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. The room is about 40 feet square and 20 feet high. Twin segmental-arched fireplaces along the east wall flank the speaker’s dais. Massive fluted pilasters raised on pedestals adorn the paneled east wall. The other three walls are plastered. A heavy Roman Doric entablature borders the plaster ceiling. The furniture arrangement at the time of the Continental Congress has been duplicated. The only original furnishings are the “Rising Sun” chair and the silver inkstand with quill box and shaker used by the signers of the Declaration and the Constitution.

The main point of interest inside Independence Hall is the Assembly Room, the one on the eastern side of the first floor. Probably no other room in the United States has witnessed such political courage and wisdom. In this room, members of the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention created and signed the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The room is about 40 feet square and 20 feet high. Twin segmental-arched fireplaces on the east wall flank the speaker’s platform. Massive fluted pillars set on pedestals decorate the paneled east wall. The other three walls are plastered. A heavy Roman Doric entablature surrounds the plaster ceiling. The furniture arrangement from the time of the Continental Congress has been recreated. The only original pieces are the “Rising Sun” chair and the silver inkstand with quill box and shaker used by the signers of the Declaration and the Constitution.

220

220

Restored Assembly Room, Independence Hall, where Members of the Continental Congress adopted and signed the Declaration of Independence.

221 The other large room on the ground floor, where the U.S. Supreme Court held sessions for a few days in 1791 and again in August 1796, housed the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and later other State and local courts. The paneled walls are decorated with massive fluted pilasters of the Roman Doric order. The central hall between this room and the Assembly Room is richly adorned with a Roman Doric order of columns and entablature, fully membered. On the second floor are the Long Room, Governor’s Council Chamber, and Committee Room. These are furnished to represent the activities of the Pennsylvania legislature and government prior to 1775.

221 The other large room on the ground floor, where the U.S. Supreme Court met for a few days in 1791 and again in August 1796, served as the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and later as a venue for other state and local courts. The panelled walls are adorned with large fluted columns in the Roman Doric style. The central hall between this room and the Assembly Room is richly decorated with columns and entablature in the Roman Doric style, fully detailed. On the second floor, there are the Long Room, the Governor’s Council Chamber, and the Committee Room. These are furnished to showcase the activities of the Pennsylvania legislature and government before 1775.

The Liberty Bell, a worldwide emblem of freedom, is displayed in the tower stair hall on the south end of the first floor. [When this volume went to press, the bell was scheduled to be moved in the near future to a newly constructed belltower, part of the park visitor center, located 2 blocks from Independence Hall.] The source of the 2,080-pound bell’s name is the “Proclaim Liberty” inscription, engraved on it to commemorate the 50th anniversary of William Penn’s Charter of Privileges (1701). In 1750 the Pennsylvania assembly authorized erection of the Independence Hall belltower, and the next year ordered a bell from England. After it arrived in 1752, it was cracked during testing and was twice recast by local workmen. As the official statehouse bell, it was rung on public occasions. In 1777, before the British occupied Philadelphia, the Government moved it temporarily to Allentown, Pa. Traditionally the bell cracked once again, in 1835, while tolling the death of Chief Justice John Marshall. The exterior appearances of City Hall and Congress Hall have changed little since the 1790’s, when many of the signers served in the Government. The interior of Congress Hall has been restored and refurnished as the meetingplace of Congress in the 1790’s. Exhibits in City Hall describe the activities of the U.S. Supreme Court during the same period of time, and portray Philadelphia life during the late 18th century. Carpenters’ Hall, a block east of Independence Square, is still owned and operated by the Carpenters’ Company of Philadelphia. The hall memorializes the First Continental Congress and possesses architectural significance.

The Liberty Bell, an international symbol of freedom, is showcased in the tower stair hall at the south end of the first floor. [When this volume was published, there were plans to move the bell soon to a newly built belltower as part of the park visitor center, located 2 blocks from Independence Hall.] The 2,080-pound bell gets its name from the “Proclaim Liberty” inscription engraved on it to celebrate the 50th anniversary of William Penn’s Charter of Privileges (1701). In 1750, the Pennsylvania assembly approved the construction of the Independence Hall belltower, and the following year ordered a bell from England. When it arrived in 1752, it cracked during testing and was recast twice by local craftsmen. As the official statehouse bell, it was rung for public events. In 1777, before the British took over Philadelphia, the Government temporarily moved it to Allentown, PA. Traditionally, the bell cracked again in 1835 while ringing in memory of Chief Justice John Marshall. The exteriors of City Hall and Congress Hall have changed little since the 1790s, when many of the signers served in Government. The interior of Congress Hall has been restored and furnished to reflect its use as the meeting place of Congress in the 1790s. Exhibits in City Hall detail the activities of the U.S. Supreme Court during that same period and depict life in Philadelphia during the late 18th century. Carpenters’ Hall, located a block east of Independence Square, is still owned and operated by the Carpenters’ Company of Philadelphia. The hall commemorates the First Continental Congress and has architectural significance.

The American Philosophical Society, founded in 1743 by Benjamin Franklin and the oldest learned society in the United States, still maintains its headquarters in Philosophical Hall. Its distinguished membership once included 15 of the signers. The society’s collections also contain furniture and documents associated with them.

The American Philosophical Society, founded in 1743 by Benjamin Franklin and the oldest learned society in the United States, still has its headquarters in Philosophical Hall. Its notable membership once included 15 of the signers. The society's collections also include furniture and documents linked to them.

222 In the years 1789–91, the Library Company of Philadelphia (organized in 1731), one of the first public libraries in the United States, erected Library Hall, across from Independence Square on the corner of Library and Fifth Streets. Numbering among the members were 11 signers, including company founder Franklin. Library Hall, reconstructed by the American Philosophical Society, now serves as its library. The Library Company is quartered elsewhere in the city.

222 Between 1789 and 1791, the Library Company of Philadelphia (established in 1731), one of the first public libraries in the United States, built Library Hall, located across from Independence Square at the corner of Library and Fifth Streets. Among its members were 11 signers of the Declaration of Independence, including the company's founder, Franklin. Library Hall, which was rebuilt by the American Philosophical Society, now functions as its library. The Library Company is based elsewhere in the city.

In addition to the preceding buildings, numerous sites associated with the signers have also been identified within the park. Many of them have been marked. On some, later buildings now stand. In a few instances, the National Park Service has excavated and stabilized foundations. Outstanding among the sites is that of the Jacob Graff, Jr., House, two blocks from Independence Hall on the southwest corner of Seventh and Market Streets. Jefferson was occupying the second floor of the 3½-story brick house when he wrote the Declaration in June 1776. His rented quarters consisted of a bedroom and parlor. He likely did much of his writing on a portable writing desk of his own design. In 1791 the Graff House was also the residence of signer James Wilson. It was demolished in 1883.

In addition to the buildings mentioned earlier, several locations related to the signers have also been discovered within the park. Many of them have been marked. Some now have newer buildings on them. In a few cases, the National Park Service has excavated and reinforced the foundations. One of the most notable sites is the Jacob Graff, Jr., House, which is two blocks from Independence Hall at the southwest corner of Seventh and Market Streets. Jefferson lived on the second floor of the 3½-story brick house when he wrote the Declaration in June 1776. His rented space included a bedroom and a parlor. He probably did a lot of his writing at a portable writing desk he designed himself. In 1791, the Graff House was also the home of signer James Wilson. It was torn down in 1883.

Other sites include those of the home (1766–90) and other structures associated with Franklin, on Franklin Court in the block south of Market Street between Third and Fourth Streets; two adjoining homes (1785–90 and 1790–95) of Robert Morris, on the southeast corner of Market and Sixth Streets, one of which was the unofficial Presidential Mansion (1790–1800), where John Adams resided (1797–1800) while President; Clarke Hall, on the southwest corner of Chestnut and Third Streets, the residence of Samuel Huntington (1779–81) and Thomas McKean (1781); Benjamin Rush’s home (1791–93), on the northwest corner of Walnut and Third Streets; the James Wilson home (“Fort Wilson”) (1778–90), on the southwest corner of the same intersection; and City Tavern, near Walnut and Second Streets, a gathering place for members of the Continental Congress and Constitutional Convention, as well as other Government officials.

Other sites include the house (1766–90) and other buildings connected to Franklin, located at Franklin Court in the block south of Market Street between Third and Fourth Streets; two neighboring homes (1785–90 and 1790–95) of Robert Morris, on the southeast corner of Market and Sixth Streets, one of which served as the unofficial Presidential Mansion (1790–1800), where John Adams lived (1797–1800) while he was President; Clarke Hall, on the southwest corner of Chestnut and Third Streets, the home of Samuel Huntington (1779–81) and Thomas McKean (1781); Benjamin Rush’s residence (1791–93), on the northwest corner of Walnut and Third Streets; the James Wilson house (“Fort Wilson”) (1778–90), on the southwest corner of the same intersection; and City Tavern, near Walnut and Second Streets, a meeting spot for members of the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention, along with other government officials.

In connection with the U.S. Bicentennial commemoration, the National Park Service plans to reconstruct the Graff House and the City Tavern.

In relation to the U.S. Bicentennial celebration, the National Park Service intends to rebuild the Graff House and the City Tavern.

223

223

Congress Hall, seat of the U.S. Congress from 1790 until 1800.

224 The graves and tombs of seven signers are also located in the park. Five (Franklin, Hewes, Hopkinson, Ross, and Rush) are in Christ Church Burial Ground, at the southeast corner of Fifth and Arch Streets; and two (Wilson and Robert Morris) in the yard of Christ Church, on Second Street between Church and Filbert Streets. The graves of Hewes and Ross are unmarked. A rose garden, dedicated in January 1971 to the memory of the signers of the Declaration by the Daughters of the American Revolution, is situated in a plot in the area between Walnut and Locust and Fourth and Fifth Streets.

224 The graves and tombs of seven signers are also found in the park. Five (Franklin, Hewes, Hopkinson, Ross, and Rush) are in Christ Church Burial Ground, located at the southeast corner of Fifth and Arch Streets; while two (Wilson and Robert Morris) are in the yard of Christ Church, on Second Street between Church and Filbert Streets. The graves of Hewes and Ross are unmarked. A rose garden, dedicated in January 1971 to honor the signers of the Declaration by the Daughters of the American Revolution, is situated in a plot between Walnut and Locust and Fourth and Fifth Streets.

Carpenters’ Hall, meetingplace in 1774–75 of the First Continental Congress.

Buildings and sites in the park that are mainly of interest in other themes of history than that treated in this volume include: the First Bank of the United States; the Second Bank of the United States (Old Custom House); New Hall (Marine Corps Museum); the Pemberton House (Army-Navy Museum); the Philadelphia (Merchants’) Exchange; the Bishop White House; the Deshler-Morris House, in Germantown; the Todd House; St. George’s Church; St. Joseph’s Church; St. Mary’s Church; Mikveh Israel Cemetery; and Gloria Dei (Old Swede’s) Church National Historic Site.

Buildings and sites in the park that are mainly of interest in other historical themes besides those covered in this volume include: the First Bank of the United States; the Second Bank of the United States (Old Custom House); New Hall (Marine Corps Museum); the Pemberton House (Army-Navy Museum); the Philadelphia (Merchants’) Exchange; the Bishop White House; the Deshler-Morris House in Germantown; the Todd House; St. George’s Church; St. Joseph’s Church; St. Mary’s Church; Mikveh Israel Cemetery; and the Gloria Dei (Old Swede’s) Church National Historic Site.

225

225

The Graff House about 1855. By this time, alterations had rendered it almost completely unrecognizable from its original appearance. Among other changes, it had been joined to an adjacent building and raised a story higher, more than doubling its size.

226 The structures and properties in 22-acre Independence National Historical Park, most of which are open to the public, include those owned by the city of Philadelphia, but administered by the National Park Service. These consist of Independence Hall, Congress Hall, City Hall, and Independence Square. In recent years, to enhance the setting of the area, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has created Independence Mall in the three blocks directly north of Independence Hall. Federally owned buildings include the First and Second Banks of the United States; the Deshler-Morris House, administered by the Germantown Historical Society; Todd House; Bishop White House; New Hall; Pemberton House; and the Philadelphia Exchange.

226 The structures and features of the 22-acre Independence National Historical Park, most of which are accessible to the public, include those owned by the city of Philadelphia but managed by the National Park Service. They include Independence Hall, Congress Hall, City Hall, and Independence Square. Recently, to improve the area’s atmosphere, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has developed Independence Mall in the three blocks directly north of Independence Hall. Federally owned buildings include the First and Second Banks of the United States; the Deshler-Morris House, managed by the Germantown Historical Society; Todd House; Bishop White House; New Hall; Pemberton House; and the Philadelphia Exchange.

Among those privately owned buildings whose owners have cooperative agreements with the National Park Service are Carpenters’ Hall and Christ Church, both National Historic Landmarks. The American Philosophical Society owns Philosophical Hall, another Landmark and the only privately owned building on the square, but also operates Library Hall, on federally owned land.

Among the privately owned buildings that have cooperative agreements with the National Park Service are Carpenters' Hall and Christ Church, both of which are National Historic Landmarks. The American Philosophical Society owns Philosophical Hall, another Landmark and the only privately owned building in the square, and also manages Library Hall, which is on federally owned land.

In 1948, upon recommendation of the Philadelphia National Shrines Park Commission, Congress created Independence National Historical Park. This act specified the Federal Government’s role in the commemoration of existing historic sites and buildings and the acquisition and management of others. The entire undertaking is guided by an advisory commission of distinguished citizens. Many individuals and private and civic organizations have contributed to the preservation and beautification of the park.

In 1948, based on the recommendation of the Philadelphia National Shrines Park Commission, Congress established Independence National Historical Park. This legislation outlined the Federal Government's responsibility in honoring existing historic sites and buildings, as well as in acquiring and managing additional ones. The whole effort is overseen by an advisory commission made up of prominent citizens. Numerous individuals, along with private and civic organizations, have played a significant role in preserving and enhancing the park.


Parsons-Taylor House, Pennsylvania  ‎⊗

Location: Northampton County, northeast corner of Fourth and Ferry Streets, Easton.

Location: Northampton County, at the northeast corner of Fourth and Ferry Streets, Easton.

This house, built by William Parsons in 1757, was leased by George Taylor during the last year of his life and was the site of his death in February 1781. His health failing and his iron business declining, he had moved there the previous April from Greenwich Township, N.J.

This house, built by William Parsons in 1757, was rented by George Taylor during the last year of his life and was where he passed away in February 1781. With his health declining and his iron business struggling, he had moved there the previous April from Greenwich Township, N.J.

227

227

Parsons-Taylor House.

The residence, a small, two-story Georgian structure constructed of fieldstone, has a steep gable roof and a pent roof extending along the front at the second-floor level. A single chimney is located in the north sidewall. The front door is surmounted by a rectangular transom; the center door, in the south side, is sheltered by a hood. A frame attachment to the house, probably existing in 1780, no longer stands.

The house, a small two-story Georgian building made of fieldstone, has a steep gabled roof and a pent roof that extends across the front at the second floor. There's a single chimney on the north side wall. The front door has a rectangular transom above it; the center door, on the south side, is covered by a hood. An addition to the house, likely built in 1780, is no longer there.

A single large room containing stairs and a fireplace on the north wall make up the first floor. The walls are plastered, and the joists are supported by heavy, exposed beams. Bedrooms occupy the second floor and attic. Restored about 1906, the structure is in fine condition and is owned by the George Taylor Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, which uses it as a meetingplace. It is not usually open to visitors.

A single large room with stairs and a fireplace on the north wall makes up the first floor. The walls are plastered, and the joists are supported by heavy, exposed beams. Bedrooms are on the second floor and in the attic. Restored around 1906, the building is in great condition and is owned by the George Taylor Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, which uses it as a meeting place. It’s not usually open to visitors.


228

228

Shippen-Wistar House, Pennsylvania  ‎⊗

Location: Philadelphia County, southwest corner of Fourth and Locust Streets, Philadelphia.

Location: Philadelphia County, at the southwest corner of Fourth and Locust Streets, Philadelphia.

Meetingplace of medical and political dignitaries, this townhouse was the residence of three eminent doctors and was visited by some of the signers and other key governmental officials. It was erected about 1750 by Dr. William Shippen, Sr. (1712–1802). A prominent medical man of his day, he also served in the Continental Congress and contributed to Philadelphia’s cultural life. His son, Dr. William Shippen, Jr. (1736–1808), won distinction as a teacher as well as a practitioner, helped found the University of Pennsylvania Medical School, and in the period 1777–81 directed medical services in the Continental Army. He and his father apparently shared the residence part of the time during their careers. Like the Shippens, Dr. Caspar Wistar (1761–1818), who acquired the house in 1798, was distinguished in medical and intellectual circles.

Meeting place for medical and political leaders, this townhouse was home to three notable doctors and was frequented by some of the signers and other key government officials. It was built around 1750 by Dr. William Shippen, Sr. (1712–1802). A leading medical figure of his time, he also served in the Continental Congress and contributed to Philadelphia’s cultural scene. His son, Dr. William Shippen, Jr. (1736–1808), gained recognition as both a teacher and a practitioner, helped establish the University of Pennsylvania Medical School, and from 1777 to 1781 managed medical services in the Continental Army. He and his father apparently shared the home for part of their careers. Like the Shippens, Dr. Caspar Wistar (1761–1818), who purchased the house in 1798, was well-respected in medical and intellectual circles.

Various signers and other Delegates to the Continental Congress paid visits to the home. Richard Henry Lee, brother-in-law of young Shippen, stayed there. Francis Lightfoot and Arthur Lee likely often made calls. On occasion John Adams and John Witherspoon stopped by. Other notables who did so later were George Washington, while presiding over the Constitutional Convention (1787); Benjamin Rush, before his clash with Shippen, Jr., over medical conditions in the Continental Army; Robert R. Livingston, who had served on the Declaration drafting committee, in the 1780’s; John Adams, while Vice President; and Jefferson, as Secretary of State.

Various signers and other delegates of the Continental Congress visited the home. Richard Henry Lee, who was the brother-in-law of young Shippen, stayed there. Francis Lightfoot and Arthur Lee probably stopped by often. From time to time, John Adams and John Witherspoon would drop in. Other notable visitors later included George Washington while he was presiding over the Constitutional Convention (1787); Benjamin Rush, before his disagreement with Shippen Jr. about medical issues in the Continental Army; Robert R. Livingston, who had been on the Declaration drafting committee in the 1780s; John Adams when he was Vice President; and Jefferson when he was Secretary of State.

The exterior of the house is in good condition, but the interior has been extensively altered. A 3½-story building in the colonial Philadelphia architectural style, it is constructed in Flemish bond with red bricks and black headers. The windows are shuttered. Notable are a high gable on the Fourth Street side and brick parapet walls on the roof joining the two end chimneys, one on each side of the roof near the peak of the ridge. A garden extends along the Locust Street side at the original rear of the house, which is now entered from that side rather than from Fourth Street. The building is owned and occupied by an insurance company, which has built a passageway between it and the adjacent Cadwalader House on the south. Access to the two structures is limited to the company’s customers.

The outside of the house is in good shape, but the inside has been significantly changed. It’s a 3½-story building in the colonial Philadelphia architectural style, made from Flemish bond red bricks with black headers. The windows have shutters. A standout feature is the high gable on the Fourth Street side and the brick parapet walls on the roof connecting the two end chimneys, one on each side near the peak of the roof. There’s a garden along the Locust Street side at the original back of the house, which is now accessed from that side instead of Fourth Street. The building is owned and occupied by an insurance company, which has created a passageway between it and the neighboring Cadwalader House to the south. Access to both buildings is restricted to the company’s customers.


229

229

Summerseat, Pennsylvania  ∆

Location: Bucks County, on Clymer Street in the block bounded by Morris and Hillcrest Avenues, Morrisville.

Location: Bucks County, on Clymer Street between Morris and Hillcrest Avenues, Morrisville.

Summerseat was erected in the 1770’s by Thomas Barclay, a Philadelphia merchant. In 1806 George Clymer acquired it and resided in it until his death in 1813. It is a two-story, brick and stone Georgian structure over an elevated basement. The roof is gabled and slate-covered. The wall of the front, or east, facade is brick; the end walls, probably also of brick, are covered with cement; the rear wall is of fieldstone. Front first- and second-story windows are topped by flat arches of gauged brick; rear windows on both levels and all the basement windows, by segmental arches, also of gauged brick. Exterior solid shutters flank the first- and second-story windows.

Summerseat was built in the 1770s by Thomas Barclay, a merchant from Philadelphia. In 1806, George Clymer bought it and lived there until he died in 1813. It’s a two-story, brick and stone Georgian building with an elevated basement. The roof has a gabled design and is covered in slate. The front wall, or east facade, is made of brick; the side walls, likely also brick, are covered with cement; the back wall is made of fieldstone. The first and second-story front windows have flat arches made of gauged brick, while the rear windows on both levels and all the basement windows have segmental arches, also made of gauged brick. Solid exterior shutters line the first and second-story windows.

A rectangular transom and triangular pediment surmount the front center door. Central halls divide the four rooms on each floor into pairs. Each of the rooms is equipped with a fireplace. The stairs, located at the rear of the hall along the south wall, are lighted by a large window over the landing. The walls, floors, and some of the woodwork appear to be original. Restored in 1931 and renovated 4 years later, the house is owned by the Morrisville School District and is used for educational purposes. It is open to the public only on a restricted basis.

A rectangular transom and triangular pediment sit above the front center door. Central halls split the four rooms on each floor into pairs. Each room has a fireplace. The stairs, located at the back of the hall along the south wall, are lit by a large window above the landing. The walls, floors, and some of the woodwork seem to be original. Restored in 1931 and renovated four years later, the house is owned by the Morrisville School District and is used for educational purposes. It is open to the public only on a limited basis.

Summerseat.

230

230

Taylor House, Pennsylvania  ∆

Location: Lehigh County, on Front Street, Catasauqua.

Location: Lehigh County, on Front Street, Catasauqua.

In 1768 George Taylor employed Philadelphia carpenters to build this stone residence on the east bank of the Lehigh River, about 15 miles west of Easton at the site of present Catasauqua. The structure was located on a 331-acre tract of land, known as the “Manor of Chawton,” which he had acquired the previous year. In 1771 he leased out most of the manor as a farm, and 5 years later sold the house and land to Philadelphia merchant John Benezet.

In 1768, George Taylor hired carpenters from Philadelphia to construct this stone house on the east bank of the Lehigh River, about 15 miles west of Easton, at what is now Catasauqua. The building was situated on a 331-acre piece of land called the “Manor of Chawton,” which he had purchased the year before. In 1771, he rented out most of the manor as farmland, and five years later, he sold the house and land to Philadelphia merchant John Benezet.

The rectangular residence is Georgian in style and consists of two stories over an elevated basement. The thick walls are built of stone masonry rubble faced with a whitish, slaked-lime stucco. Over the windows are flat arches of gauged brick. First-floor windows have exterior solid-panel shutters; those on the second floor, louvered. A heavy, overhanging cornice surrounds the truncated hip roof. The brick chimneys at both ends are symmetrically paired. A two-story stone kitchen wing, dating from about 1800, adjoins the house at the south end.

The rectangular house is in the Georgian style and has two stories above an elevated basement. The thick walls are made of stone masonry rubble covered with a whitish, slaked-lime stucco. Flat arches of gauged brick sit above the windows. The first-floor windows have solid-panel shutters on the outside, while the second-floor windows have louvered shutters. A heavy, overhanging cornice runs around the truncated hip roof. The brick chimneys at both ends are arranged symmetrically. A two-story stone kitchen wing, dating back to around 1800, connects to the house at the south end.

Taylor House.

At the center of the front, or west, facade, a flight of marble pyramidal steps lead up to a double door, over which are a rectangular transom and triangular pediment. The central hall, which extends to the rear of the house toward the stairway, is divided by an archway, with fluted pilasters. Situated to the north of the hall are living room and parlor; to the south, dining room and reception, or service, room. Of special interest in the dining room, parlor, and living room231 are the finely executed door pediments and fully paneled fireplace walls. Other walls in these rooms have paneled wainscots and finely detailed chair rails. The fireplace paneling and mantel in the dining room date from the 19th century and represent the Greek Revival style, but the rest of the first-floor paneling and mantels are original, as are also the wide pine floorboards and iron hardware.

At the center of the front, or west, facade, a set of marble pyramid steps leads up to a double door, above which are a rectangular transom and triangular pediment. The central hall, which extends toward the back of the house towards the stairway, is divided by an archway with fluted pilasters. To the north of the hall are the living room and parlor; to the south, the dining room and a reception or service room. Notable features in the dining room, parlor, and living room231 include the elegantly designed door pediments and fully paneled fireplace walls. The other walls in these rooms have paneled wainscoting and intricately detailed chair rails. The fireplace paneling and mantel in the dining room are from the 19th century and represent the Greek Revival style, but the rest of the first-floor paneling and mantels are original, as are the wide pine floorboards and iron hardware.

The second floor consists of four bedrooms and two small dressing rooms. The fireplace paneling in the two bedrooms on the front side of the house is almost as elaborate as that downstairs. A 1½-story, brick summer kitchen, near the rear of the house, dates from about 1850.

The second floor has four bedrooms and two small dressing rooms. The fireplace paneling in the two bedrooms at the front of the house is nearly as detailed as that on the first floor. A 1½-story brick summer kitchen, located at the back of the house, was built around 1850.

The slightly altered Taylor House, acquired in 1945 by the Lehigh County Historical Society and restored in 1966–68, is in excellent condition and is open to the public.

The slightly modified Taylor House, purchased in 1945 by the Lehigh County Historical Society and renovated in 1966–68, is in great shape and is open to the public.


Governor Hopkins House, Rhode Island  ∆

Location: Providence County, 15 Hopkins Street, Providence.

Location: Providence County, 15 Hopkins Street, Providence.

Stephen Hopkins bought this framehouse in 1742 and resided in it until his death in 1785. It is the only extant structure closely associated with him. The oldest section, the lower level of the present southwest rear ell, dates from about 1707, when the small dwelling comprised two first-floor rooms and an attic. As soon as he acquired the building, Hopkins enlarged and remodeled it into its present L-shaped, two-story form.

Stephen Hopkins bought this house in 1742 and lived in it until he passed away in 1785. It’s the only remaining building closely linked to him. The oldest part, the lower level of the current southwest rear section, dates back to around 1707, when the small home had two rooms on the first floor and an attic. Once he purchased the place, Hopkins expanded and remodeled it into its current L-shaped, two-story design.

The Georgian building, which has a gabled roof and two chimneys, is clapboarded. Cornices decorate the first-story windows. In 1928, during a major restoration, a reconstructed door, with triangular pediment and pilasters typical of the 18th century, was inserted in place of one of the four windows along the present front elevation. This door, the only major alteration in the house, became the main entrance. It replaced a door on the west side, which opens into the original kitchen and is still extant.

The Georgian building, featuring a gabled roof and two chimneys, is covered with clapboard. The first-story windows are adorned with cornices. In 1928, during a significant restoration, a reconstructed door with a triangular pediment and pilasters typical of the 18th century was added in place of one of the four windows on the current front elevation. This door, the only major change to the house, became the main entrance. It replaced a door on the west side that leads into the original kitchen, which is still there.

The central hall, along the east wall of which is the main stairway, divides the front of the residence into two rooms, study and parlor. The recessed parlor bookshelves, set in paneling above the hearth, are distinctive. The paneling of the two fireplaces in the study and ell is simpler. A passageway leads from the parlor to the southwest ell,232 which consists of the original kitchen and in the southeast corner a small bedroom. Five bedrooms, two of which are equipped with fireplaces, are located upstairs. The interior of the house, including stairs, woodwork, floors, and fireplaces, is largely original. The fine garden was designed by a descendant of Stephen Hopkins, the late Alden Hopkins, prominent landscape architect.

The central hall, which has the main staircase along the east wall, separates the front of the house into two rooms: the study and the parlor. The built-in bookcases in the parlor, set into the paneling above the fireplace, are quite unique. The paneling around the fireplaces in the study and ell is more straightforward. A hallway connects the parlor to the southwest ell,232, which includes the original kitchen and a small bedroom in the southeast corner. There are five bedrooms upstairs, two of which have fireplaces. The interior of the house, including the stairs, woodwork, floors, and fireplaces, mostly retains its original style. The beautiful garden was designed by a descendant of Stephen Hopkins, the late Alden Hopkins, who was a well-known landscape architect.

Governor Hopkins House.

The Governor Hopkins House, first located on the northeast corner of Hopkins and South Main Streets, was moved eastward in 1804 along the north side of and about halfway up Hopkins Street. In 1927, to make way for the construction of a new courthouse, the building was again relocated eastward along the same street, to its present site, and the next year was restored. Since that time, the State of Rhode Island has owned the house and maintained the exterior and grounds. The Society of Colonial Dames in the State of Rhode Island maintains and administers the interior as a historic house museum.

The Governor Hopkins House, initially located at the northeast corner of Hopkins and South Main Streets, was moved east in 1804 to the north side of Hopkins Street, about halfway up. In 1927, to make space for a new courthouse, the building was relocated again along the same street to its current location, and it was restored the following year. Since then, the State of Rhode Island has owned the house and taken care of the exterior and grounds. The Society of Colonial Dames in the State of Rhode Island manages the interior as a historic house museum.


233

233

Heyward-Washington House, South Carolina  ∆

Location: Charleston County, 87 Church Street, Charleston.

Location: Charleston County, 87 Church Street, Charleston.

From 1778 until 1794 this townhouse was the principal residence of Thomas Heyward, Jr. During this period, however, he also spent considerable time at White Hall, his country estate near that of his father about 25 miles northeast of Savannah, and in 1780–81 was imprisoned by the British at St. Augustine. In 1770 his father, Daniel, a rice planter, had purchased the lot and a two-story house standing on it. Within 2 years, he probably demolished it and erected the present one. Thomas inherited it in 1777, and moved in the following year, upon completion of his tour in the Continental Congress. In 1780, when the British took Charleston, they captured him and forced his family to flee from the townhouse. For a week in 1791 the city rented it for use of President Washington, who was visiting Charleston while touring the Southern States. Three years later, Heyward sold the property and retired to White Hall.

From 1778 to 1794, this townhouse was the main home of Thomas Heyward, Jr. During this time, he also spent a lot of time at White Hall, his country estate near his father's place, about 25 miles northeast of Savannah. In 1780–81, he was imprisoned by the British in St. Augustine. In 1770, his father, Daniel, a rice planter, bought the lot and a two-story house on it. Within two years, he likely tore it down and built the current one. Thomas inherited it in 1777 and moved in the next year, after finishing his time in the Continental Congress. In 1780, when the British captured Charleston, they took him prisoner and forced his family to escape from the townhouse. For a week in 1791, the city rented it for President Washington's use while he was visiting Charleston during his tour of the Southern States. Three years later, Heyward sold the property and retired to White Hall.

Heyward-Washington House.

A slightly altered Georgian structure, the residence is a superb example of a Charleston “double house.” The floor plan is the typical Georgian center hall type, with four rooms on each floor. Two234 interior chimneys allow for two fireplaces in pairs set back to back on all floors. The first-floor rooms are simple; those on the second, elaborate, for entertaining. The downstairs hall, divided by an arch at midpoint, extends to a rear door. A Palladian window lights the stairway, located at the rear of the hall against the north wall.

A slightly modified Georgian building, this residence is a fantastic example of a Charleston “double house.” The layout follows the typical Georgian center hall style, featuring four rooms on each floor. Two interior chimneys provide for two fireplaces arranged back to back on every floor. The rooms on the first floor are straightforward, while those on the second are more elaborate for entertaining. The downstairs hall, separated by an arch in the middle, leads to a back door. A Palladian window illuminates the staircase, which is found at the rear of the hall along the north wall.

The large second-floor drawing room, the most elaborate room in the house, features paneled walls, pedimented doors, interior paneled shutters, an elaborate ceiling cornice, and a fireplace with a magnificent carved mantel. In addition to the drawing room, the second floor contains a smaller parlor and two bedrooms, each of which has a paneled fireplace wall. Four more rooms are located on both the first and third floors. Except for reconstruction in 1929 of one front room and the front of the hall on the first floor, the structure is largely original.

The large drawing room on the second floor, the most ornate room in the house, has paneled walls, pedimented doors, interior paneled shutters, a detailed ceiling cornice, and a stunning fireplace with a beautifully carved mantel. Besides the drawing room, the second floor also has a smaller parlor and two bedrooms, each with a paneled fireplace wall. There are four more rooms on both the first and third floors. Aside from a remodel in 1929 of one front room and the front of the hall on the first floor, the building is mostly original.

The brick house is square and rises three stories. The hipped roof is pierced by a single front dormer and ornamented by a narrow, denticulated cornice. Brick flat arches head the windows. The upper windows have louvered shutters; those on the first floor, paneled shutters. The center entrance, a reconstruction, consists of a fan-lighted door surmounted by a pediment and flanked by Roman Doric columns. A rear courtyard contains a brick kitchen-laundry with slave quarters above, a carriage house, wood and tool sheds, a necessary, and garden.

The brick house is square and three stories tall. The hipped roof has a single front dormer and is decorated with a narrow, denticulated cornice. Brick flat arches top the windows. The upper windows have louvered shutters, while the first-floor windows have paneled shutters. The center entrance, which is a reconstruction, features a door with a fan light above it, topped by a pediment and flanked by Roman Doric columns. A back courtyard includes a brick kitchen-laundry with slave quarters above, a carriage house, wood and tool sheds, a restroom, and a garden.

Subsequent to Heyward’s ownership, the house passed through several hands until rescued from the threat of demolition in 1929 by the Charleston Museum. After restoration and furnishing with period pieces, it was opened to the public. A collection of china once owned by Heyward is on display, as well as portraits of the Heyward family.

After Heyward's ownership, the house changed hands several times until it was saved from being demolished in 1929 by the Charleston Museum. After being restored and furnished with period pieces, it opened to the public. A collection of china that once belonged to Heyward is on display, along with portraits of the Heyward family.


Hopsewee-on-the-Santee, South Carolina  ∆

Location: Georgetown County, on an unimproved road just west of U.S. 17, about 13 miles southwest of Georgetown.

Location: Georgetown County, on a dirt road just west of U.S. 17, approximately 13 miles southwest of Georgetown.

Erected by his father during the 1740’s, this house on the north bank of the North Santee River was the birthplace in 1749 and the boyhood home of Thomas Lynch, Jr. He lived in it until his father sold it in 1763, the year before young Lynch sailed to Europe to235 continue his education. It is the only surviving residence closely associated with him.

Erected by his father in the 1740s, this house on the north bank of the North Santee River was the birthplace in 1749 and the childhood home of Thomas Lynch, Jr. He lived there until his father sold it in 1763, the year before young Lynch went to Europe to235continue his education. It’s the only remaining residence closely associated with him.

Hopsewee-on-the-Santee.

The 2½-story framehouse rests on a brick foundation, which is covered with scored tabby. Two front dormers and two interior chimneys protrude from the hip roof. A broad, two-story porch, or piazza, with square columns extends across the front of the building. The frame, comprised of black cypress, is of mortise-and-tenon construction, and the walls are clapboarded. Exterior paneled shutters flank the first- and second-story windows. Except for the present metal roof and the screening of the front porch, the outside of the structure has not been appreciably altered.

The 2½-story frame house sits on a brick foundation, which is coated with scored tabby. Two front dormers and two interior chimneys stick out from the hip roof. A wide, two-story porch, or piazza, with square columns spans the front of the building. The frame, made of black cypress, uses mortise-and-tenon construction, and the walls are covered with clapboard. Exterior paneled shutters are positioned next to the windows on both the first and second floors. Aside from the current metal roof and the screening on the front porch, the outside of the building hasn’t changed much.

The central hall arrangement divides four rooms into pairs on the first two floors. All the rooms are equipped with fireplaces. Throughout, the mantels, wainscoting, cornice mold, and heart pine floors are original and excellently crafted. The full cellar is constructed of brick and divided into rooms. Two one-story, cypress, shingled outbuildings, located to the northeast and northwest of the main house, probably once served as kitchens. About 1948, by which time the house had fallen into decay and the grounds were overgrown, the present owner acquired the property, restored the garden, and236 repaired the residence. In fine condition, it is privately occupied, but is shown to the public part of the week.

The central hall setup splits four rooms into pairs on the first two floors. All the rooms have fireplaces. Throughout the space, the mantels, wainscoting, cornice mold, and heart pine floors are original and well-crafted. The full cellar is made of brick and divided into separate rooms. There are two one-story cypress shingled outbuildings, located to the northeast and northwest of the main house, which probably used to be kitchens. Around 1948, when the house had become rundown and the grounds were overgrown, the current owner bought the property, restored the garden, and236 repaired the house. It’s in great condition, privately occupied, but open to the public part of the week.


Middleton Place, South Carolina  ∆

Location: Dorchester County, on an unimproved road just east of S.C. 61, about 13 miles northwest of Charleston.

Location: Dorchester County, on a bumpy road just east of S.C. 61, approximately 13 miles northwest of Charleston.

This mansion, of which only the south wing stands today, was the birthplace and lifelong home of Arthur Middleton (1742–87). About 1738 his grandfather had built a 3½-story brick house at the site. Some 3 years later, Arthur’s father began laying out the surrounding gardens that have since won international fame as Middleton Place Gardens. More than 100 slaves labored for a decade to complete the 45-acre gardens and 16-acre lawn. In 1755 the mansion was enlarged by the addition of two two-story brick flankers, or detached wings, on the north and south sides of the original structure, for use respectively as a library-conservatory and guest quarters.

This mansion, of which only the south wing remains today, was the birthplace and lifelong home of Arthur Middleton (1742–87). Around 1738, his grandfather built a 3½-story brick house on this site. About three years later, Arthur’s father started designing the surrounding gardens that have since gained international recognition as Middleton Place Gardens. More than 100 enslaved people worked for a decade to finish the 45 acres of gardens and 16 acres of lawn. In 1755, the mansion was expanded with the addition of two two-story brick wings on the north and south sides of the original building, which served as a library-conservatory and guest quarters, respectively.

During the War for Independence, British troops pillaged the residence and despoiled the plantation. In 1865, as Union soldiers approached during the Civil War, the slaves set the mansion to the torch, which left only the walls standing. In 1868 William Middleton erected a roof over the south wing, the least damaged section of the three, and reoccupied it. In 1886 an earthquake felled the ruined walls of the north wing and central section.

During the War for Independence, British troops raided the house and ransacked the plantation. In 1865, as Union soldiers drew near during the Civil War, the enslaved people set the mansion on fire, leaving only the walls standing. In 1868, William Middleton put a roof on the south wing, the least damaged part of the three, and moved back in. In 1886, an earthquake caused the crumbling walls of the north wing and central section to collapse.

The south wing (1755) of Middleton Place, the only 18th-century section of the mansion that has survived.

237 In the 1930’s the two-story, brick south wing was renovated and enlarged. The major additions, both two-story brick and executed in an 18th-century manner, were a service wing along the main axis of the wing at the south end; and, on the west side, a right-angled entrance wing, containing a vestibule and stairway, and constructed with a stepped and curvilinear gable roof to match those on the ends of the original south wing. A third addition in the 1930’s was a one-story brick porch on the east, or river, elevation. All the brickwork is Flemish bond, the shutters are paneled, and a louvered circular window decorates the gable end of the new entrance wing. The interior chimneys are three in number. A parlor, dining room, and living room are located on the first floor of the original south wing and three bedrooms on the second. The interior finish dates from the mid-19th century, but many of the furnishings are original 18th-century Middleton pieces.

237 In the 1930s, the two-story brick south wing was updated and expanded. The main additions, both two-story brick and designed in an 18th-century style, included a service wing along the main axis at the south end, and a right-angled entrance wing on the west side, which features a vestibule and stairway, topped with a stepped and curvilinear gable roof that matches those on the ends of the original south wing. A third addition in the 1930s was a one-story brick porch on the east side, facing the river. All the brickwork is done in Flemish bond, the shutters are paneled, and there's a louvered circular window adorning the gable end of the new entrance wing. There are three interior chimneys. The first floor of the original south wing has a parlor, dining room, and living room, while three bedrooms are located on the second floor. The interior finish dates back to the mid-19th century, but many of the furnishings are original 18th-century pieces from Middleton.

To the east and north of the present house and ruins of the central block and north wing are the famous gardens, which have been enlarged and perfected over the years. They extend from the Ashley River and the paired butterfly lakes at their foot west toward the residence and beyond in sweeping terraces. To the northwest of the house, in another 18th-century formal garden, is the family graveyard, containing the mausoleum of Arthur Middleton.

To the east and north of the current house and the ruins of the central block and north wing are the well-known gardens, which have been expanded and improved over the years. They stretch from the Ashley River and the twin butterfly lakes at their base, extending westward toward the residence and beyond in broad terraces. To the northwest of the house, in another 18th-century formal garden, is the family graveyard, which includes the mausoleum of Arthur Middleton.

The estate comprises 7,000 acres and is still owned by Middleton descendants. They occupy the south wing, which is not open to the public, unlike the gardens. According to present plans, about 110 acres, embracing the gardens, burial plot, plantation house, and reconstructed outbuildings, will be donated to a nonprofit organization that will preserve them and keep them open to the public.

The estate covers 7,000 acres and is still owned by the descendants of Middleton. They live in the south wing, which is not accessible to the public, unlike the gardens. According to current plans, about 110 acres, including the gardens, burial plot, plantation house, and restored outbuildings, will be given to a nonprofit organization that will preserve them and keep them open to the public.


Rutledge House, South Carolina  ∆

Location: Charleston County, 117 Broad Street, Charleston.

Location: Charleston County, 117 Broad Street, Charleston.

The residence of Edward Rutledge during his later years, this building is the only existing one that can be identified with him. Unfortunately the construction date and the exact years of his residence cannot be determined, though he was definitely the occupant in 1787.

The home of Edward Rutledge in his later years, this building is the only one that can be linked to him. Unfortunately, we can't pinpoint the construction date or the exact years he lived here, but he was definitely residing here in 1787.

The large, rectilinear, clapboarded, frame structure is two stories high over a basement. The roof is hipped. A bilevel porch, supported238 by columns, extends across the west side and around the south, or rear, side of the house. A central modillioned pediment with circular window fronts the main roof and is “supported” by consoles. Exterior louvered shutters flank the corniced windows. The center doorway, once crowned by a cornice, now has a triangular pediment. A small, two-story clapboard wing, added to the front of the east end along the main axis in the late 19th century, is the only definite major exterior alteration. Behind it, runs a two-story porch.

The large, rectangular, clapboard-frame building is two stories tall over a basement. The roof is hipped. A two-level porch, supported by columns, stretches across the west side and wraps around the south, or rear, side of the house. A central pediment with a circular window highlights the main roof and is “supported” by consoles. Exterior louvered shutters are on either side of the corniced windows. The center doorway, which used to have a cornice, now features a triangular pediment. A small, two-story clapboard addition was added to the front of the east end along the main axis in the late 19th century; it is the only significant exterior change. Behind it, there is a two-story porch.

Rutledge House.

A center hall extends about halfway through the house. On one side are two rooms with fireplaces; on the other, a front stair hall containing a curved stairway. Behind this is a large room, accessible only from the entrance hall. The kitchen, possibly another later addition, is located in a wing that projects from the rear of the house at the southeast corner. The interior woodwork appears to date from the 1880’s, and partition walls now subdivide the large original rooms into smaller ones.

A central hallway runs about halfway through the house. On one side, there are two rooms with fireplaces; on the other side, there's a front stair hall featuring a curved staircase. Behind this is a large room that's only accessible from the entrance hall. The kitchen, which may have been added later, is in a wing that extends from the back of the house at the southeast corner. The interior woodwork seems to be from the 1880s, and partition walls have since divided the large original rooms into smaller ones.

The Rutledge House, known in modern times as the Carter-May House, is now a Roman Catholic home for elderly women. Portions of the first floor may be visited upon request. A large garden is located at the rear of the building.

The Rutledge House, now called the Carter-May House, is currently a Roman Catholic home for elderly women. Parts of the first floor can be visited upon request. There's a large garden at the back of the building.


239

239

Berkeley, Virginia  ∆

Location: Charles City County, on the south side of Va. 5, about 8 miles west of Charles City.

Location: Charles City County, on the south side of Va. 5, approximately 8 miles west of Charles City.

In historical interest this fine mansion has few rivals among the James River plantations. It was the birthplace and lifelong home of Benjamin Harrison V (1726–91), signer of the Declaration and three-term Governor of Virginia, as well as the birthplace and boyhood residence of his son, William Henry (1773–1841), ninth President of the United States and grandfather of Benjamin (1833–1901), the 23rd President. William Henry probably wrote his 1841 inaugural address at Berkeley in the room in which he had been born.

In terms of historical significance, this impressive mansion stands out among the James River plantations. It was the birthplace and lifelong home of Benjamin Harrison V (1726–91), who signed the Declaration of Independence and served as Governor of Virginia for three terms, as well as the birthplace and childhood home of his son, William Henry (1773–1841), who became the ninth President of the United States and the grandfather of Benjamin (1833–1901), the 23rd President. William Henry likely wrote his inaugural address in 1841 at Berkeley, in the room where he was born.

Berkeley.

Benjamin Harrison IV, the signer’s father, built the structure in 1726. In 1781 British troops under Benedict Arnold plundered the plantation, but did not seriously harm the mansion. In the 1790’s one of the Harrisons, probably Benjamin VI, made some architectural alterations and redecorated the interior in the Adam style. By the time of the Civil War, the plantation was known as Harrison’s Landing. In 1862 it served as a supply base and camp for the Union Army of the Potomac following its retreat from the Battle of Malvern Hill, Va., which ended the Peninsular Campaign. Gen. George B.240 McClellan utilized the mansion as his headquarters. While quartered nearby, Gen. Daniel Butterfield composed the famous bugle call “Taps.”

Benjamin Harrison IV, the signer’s father, built the structure in 1726. In 1781, British troops led by Benedict Arnold raided the plantation but didn’t seriously damage the mansion. In the 1790s, one of the Harrisons, probably Benjamin VI, made some architectural changes and redecorated the interior in the Adam style. By the time of the Civil War, the plantation was known as Harrison's Landing. In 1862, it served as a supply base and camp for the Union Army of the Potomac after their retreat from the Battle of Malvern Hill, VA, which concluded the Peninsular Campaign. Gen. George B.240 McClellan used the mansion as his headquarters. While staying nearby, Gen. Daniel Butterfield composed the famous bugle call “Taps.”

The early Georgian mansion has been altered somewhat over the years, but retains much of the original structure and character. It is 2½ stories high and has a dormered, gable roof with two tall interior ridge chimneys, and distinctive pedimented gable ends, including modillioned cornice. The brick walls are laid in Flemish bond. Gauged brick is employed in the flat window arches, the belt course, and door pediments. The broad-piered central doors on the north and south elevations, with pediments in gauged brick, are reconstructions. Two detached, two-story, brick dependencies, set slightly south of the house on the river side, were built in the 1840’s to replace similar structures that had been erected sometime before 1800.

The early Georgian mansion has been updated a bit over the years, but it still keeps a lot of the original structure and character. It stands 2½ stories high and features a dormered, gable roof with two tall interior ridge chimneys and unique pedimented gable ends, including a cornice with modillions. The brick walls are laid in Flemish bond. Gauged brick is used for the flat window arches, the belt course, and door pediments. The wide-paneled central doors on the north and south sides, with pediments made of gauged brick, are newer reconstructions. Two separate, two-story brick outbuildings, located slightly south of the house on the river side, were built in the 1840s to replace similar structures that were put up sometime before 1800.

The center hall plan has been slightly modified. The hall bisects the four rooms on the first floor into pairs. A small stairs in the northwest corner was probably inserted about 1800. Most of the interior finish clearly reflects the Adam alterations of the 1790’s.

The center hall plan has been slightly changed. The hall splits the four rooms on the first floor into pairs. A small staircase in the northwest corner was likely added around 1800. Most of the interior finish clearly shows the Adam changes from the 1790s.

By 1915 the mansion was in poor condition. Subsequent owners have reconstructed and restored it to its 18th-century appearance. This included removal of a 19th-century porch on all four sides, replacement of the window sash and exterior door framings, and reconstruction of the center stairs. The upper floors are used as a private residence, but the basement and first floor may be visited. The unmarked grave of signer Benjamin Harrison is located in the family cemetery, a quarter of a mile southeast of the plantation house.

By 1915, the mansion was in bad shape. Later owners have rebuilt and restored it to look like it did in the 18th century. This included taking off a 19th-century porch on all four sides, replacing the window sashes and outer door frames, and reconstructing the main staircase. The upper floors are now a private home, but visitors can check out the basement and the first floor. The unmarked grave of signer Benjamin Harrison is in the family cemetery, a quarter mile southeast of the plantation house.


Elsing Green, Virginia  ∆

Location: King William County, on a private road about 1 mile southwest of Va. 632, some 10 miles southwest of King William Court House.

Location: King William County, on a private road approximately 1 mile southwest of Va. 632, around 10 miles southwest of King William Court House.

In 1758, while Carter Braxton was visiting in England, his brother George probably built for him this impressive plantation home on a high bluff overlooking the Pamunkey River. Upon his return in 1760, Carter took up residence in it and lived there until 1767. He then moved to a new residence, Chericoke, a few miles to the northwest.

In 1758, while Carter Braxton was visiting England, his brother George likely built this impressive plantation home for him on a high bluff overlooking the Pamunkey River. When he returned in 1760, Carter moved in and lived there until 1767. He then relocated to a new home, Chericoke, a few miles to the northwest.

241

241

Elsing Green.

The exterior is original, but about 1800 a fire destroyed the interior. The present 18th-century style woodwork is a 20th-century reconstruction. The Georgian structure of brick, laid in Flemish bond, is U-shaped. Two wings project to the north, or rear, of the central section. The large building is two stories in height and has a hip roof and four tall chimneys. Side doors are centered in each wing, and there are also central doors in the front and rear facades of the main house. The door on the front, or river, facade, with gauged brick triangular pediment, is a reconstruction.

The outside is original, but around 1800, a fire destroyed the inside. The current 18th-century style woodwork is a 20th-century reconstruction. The Georgian brick structure, laid in Flemish bond, is U-shaped. Two wings extend to the north, or back, of the central section. The large building is two stories tall and features a hip roof with four tall chimneys. Side doors are centered in each wing, and there are also central doors at the front and back of the main house. The door on the front, or river, side, with a gauged brick triangular pediment, is a reconstruction.

The flat window arches are constructed of splayed brick. The second-floor level is marked by a strong course of gauged brick, unmolded and four courses high. Two old, detached, brick dependencies, 1½ stories high, flank the mansion. The eastern one may date from 1719; the western contains a restored kitchen. A reconstructed smokehouse and dairy rest on their original, symmetrically located, foundations.

The flat window arches are made of slanted brick. The second floor features a prominent layer of carefully finished brick, four bricks high and without any molds. Two old, separate brick buildings, standing 1½ stories tall, are on either side of the mansion. The one on the east might date back to 1719; the one on the west has a renovated kitchen. A rebuilt smokehouse and dairy sit on their original, evenly positioned foundations.

An off-center hall extends northward halfway through the main arm of the U from the south, or front, entrance and intersects with an east-west lateral hall running the length of the main mansion. The ends of this long cross hall each contain a stairway set against the242 south wall. The southeast comer of the residence is occupied by a large parlor; the southwest corner, by a smaller living room; and each of the north wings, by a single large room. Four bedrooms are upstairs, which has the same general plan as the ground floor.

An off-center hallway extends northward from the front entrance, halfway through the main arm of the U, and intersects with a lateral hallway that runs east to west along the length of the main mansion. Each end of this long cross hallway has a stairway set against the242 south wall. The southeast corner of the house features a large parlor, the southwest corner has a smaller living room, and each of the north wings contains one large room. There are four bedrooms upstairs, which follow the same general layout as the ground floor.

The carefully restored house and well maintained estate, which now includes about 3,000 acres, are in excellent condition but are privately occupied and not open to visitors.

The beautifully restored house and well-kept estate, which now spans about 3,000 acres, are in fantastic shape but are privately owned and not open to the public.


Menokin, Virginia  ∆

Location: Richmond County, on an unimproved road about 1 mile west of County Route 690, some 4 miles northwest of Warsaw.

Location: Richmond County, on a bumpy road about 1 mile west of County Route 690, approximately 4 miles northwest of Warsaw.

Menokin, completed in 1769 by Col. John Tayloe of nearby Mount Airy as a wedding gift for his daughter and her husband, Francis Lightfoot Lee, was the home where they spent most of their lives and the one Lee loved best. He died there in 1797.

Menokin, completed in 1769 by Col. John Tayloe of nearby Mount Airy as a wedding gift for his daughter and her husband, Francis Lightfoot Lee, was the home where they spent most of their lives and the one Lee loved the most. He passed away there in 1797.

This late Georgian house, similar in many respects to Mount Airy though much smaller, was likely constructed by the same architect-builder, probably John Ariss. The exterior possesses the qualities of a large mansion, though the actual dimensions are rather modest.

This late Georgian house, which resembles Mount Airy in many ways but is much smaller, was probably built by the same architect-builder, likely John Ariss. The outside has the characteristics of a large mansion, even though the actual size is quite modest.

Ruins of Menokin.

243 The residence, constructed of local brown sandstone, is two stories high with hip-on-hip roof and two large interior chimneys. Its exterior walls are covered with plaster. The stone trim—quoins, belt courses, and window and door trim—is elaborate. Two stone belt courses, one at the second-floor line and the other at the sill level of the upper windows, divide the main, or north, facade horizontally. The upper course is eliminated on the other three facades. No longer standing are two two-story, gable-roofed, detached, symmetrical service buildings, a kitchen to the east and office to the west, which once stood in the forecourt at right angles to the main house. They undoubtedly heightened the impression of the mansion’s large size.

243 The house, made of local brown sandstone, is two stories tall with a hip-on-hip roof and two large interior chimneys. Its outside walls are covered in plaster. The stone details—corners, belt courses, and the trim around windows and doors—are intricate. Two stone belt courses, one at the second floor level and the other at the sill level of the upper windows, horizontally divide the main, or north, facade. The upper course is missing on the other three sides. No longer present are two two-story, gable-roofed, detached, symmetrical service buildings, a kitchen to the east and an office to the west, which used to be in the forecourt at right angles to the main house. They definitely added to the impression of the mansion’s large size.

A center hall extends halfway through the first floor, which contains dining room, living room, kitchen, and bedroom. Four bedrooms, divided into pairs by a central hall, are located on the second floor.

A central hallway runs halfway through the first floor, which includes a dining room, living room, kitchen, and bedroom. There are four bedrooms on the second floor, grouped in pairs by a central hallway.

Unoccupied for many years, Menokin is in ruinous condition. The roof and walls on the southeast side have collapsed. The yard and grounds, part of a 590-acre farm, are overgrown with vegetation and small trees. The owner has removed and stored the original interior paneling. Extensive reconstruction would be required to restore the structure to its original condition. It is not open to the public.

Unoccupied for many years, Menokin is in bad shape. The roof and walls on the southeast side have fallen down. The yard and grounds, part of a 590-acre farm, are overgrown with plants and small trees. The owner has taken out and stored the original interior paneling. A lot of reconstruction would be needed to bring the building back to its original state. It is not open to the public.


Monticello, Virginia  ∆

Location: Albemarle County, just off Va. 53, about 2 miles southeast of Charlottesville.

Location: Albemarle County, right off Va. 53, approximately 2 miles southeast of Charlottesville.

“Monticello,” Italian for “Little Mountain,” is an enduring tribute to the genius and versatility of Thomas Jefferson, who personally designed and supervised erection of the splendid mansion. He resided in it for many years of his long life, his spirit lives on in its architectural perfection and the ingenious devices with which he equipped it, and he is buried nearby. Sitting amid pleasant gardens and lawns on a hilltop, the residence overlooks Charlottesville; the University of Virginia, which Jefferson founded and some of whose buildings he designed; and the green rolling hills of the surrounding countryside. Especially after his retirement from public life in 1809 until his death, at the age of 83 on July 4, 1826, the prominent men of his244 age made pilgrimages to Monticello. To this day it is visited by the humble, as well as the great—all who admire Jefferson’s character and accomplishments.

“Monticello,” which means “Little Mountain” in Italian, is a lasting tribute to the brilliance and versatility of Thomas Jefferson, who personally designed and oversaw the construction of this magnificent mansion. He lived there for many years during his long life, and his spirit endures in its architectural beauty and the clever innovations he incorporated into it; he is also buried nearby. Nestled among lovely gardens and lawns on a hillside, the residence overlooks Charlottesville, the University of Virginia—which Jefferson founded and designed some of its buildings—and the lush rolling hills of the surrounding countryside. Especially after he retired from public life in 1809 until he passed away at 83 on July 4, 1826, prominent figures of his time made pilgrimages to Monticello. Even today, it attracts visitors from all walks of life—everyone who admires Jefferson’s character and achievements.

Monticello.

In 1757 Jefferson’s father died and passed on the property, 2,750 acres, to him. Eleven years later, he began leveling the hilltop. To make all parts of it accessible, he built paths, or roundabouts, as he called them, on its slopes at four different levels; remains of these are visible today. In 1770 fire destroyed Jefferson’s modest residence, his birthplace Shadwell, and he moved to Monticello, where he had already begun building a mansion. The first part of it completed was the small southwest pavilion, which Jefferson occupied as a bachelor’s quarters until January 1772, when he brought his bride, Martha Wayles Skelton, to share it with him. It is still known as “Honeymoon Cottage.”

In 1757, Jefferson's father died and left him the property, which was 2,750 acres. Eleven years later, he started leveling the hilltop. To make it accessible, he built paths, which he called roundabouts, on its slopes at four different levels; remnants of these are still visible today. In 1770, fire destroyed Jefferson's modest home, his birthplace Shadwell, and he moved to Monticello, where he had already started building a mansion. The first section he finished was the small southwest pavilion, which Jefferson used as a bachelor’s quarters until January 1772, when he brought his bride, Martha Wayles Skelton, to share it with him. It is still called “Honeymoon Cottage.”

The first Monticello, vastly different from the present one, was probably completed in 1775. Constructed of brick with cut-stone trim, it consisted of a central two-story unit, with pedimented gable roof running from front to rear and one-story gabled wings, set perpendicularly to the central block. The chief architectural accent was the main two-story portico, Doric below and Ionic above. Small polygonal bays projected from the ends of the wings. Jefferson made245 numerous alterations and major changes after the War for Independence. The present two-wing structure, built between 1793 and 1809, incorporates the rooms of the original house at its rear. It also reflects a shift in architectural preference in the United States from Georgian to Roman Revival—elements of both of which are represented. Jefferson was almost entirely responsible for starting the Roman Revival.

The first Monticello, which looked completely different from the current one, was probably finished in 1775. Made of brick with stone trim, it had a central two-story section with a peaked roof running from front to back and one-story gabled wings that were positioned perpendicular to the main block. The main architectural feature was the two-story portico, with Doric columns below and Ionic columns above. Small polygonal bays extended from the ends of the wings. Jefferson made245 numerous alterations and major changes after the War for Independence. The current two-wing structure, built between 1793 and 1809, includes the rooms of the original house at the back. It also shows a change in architectural style in the United States from Georgian to Roman Revival—both styles are represented. Jefferson played a significant role in initiating the Roman Revival.

The mansion consists of 2½ stories over a basement and contains 35 rooms. The dominating feature is the central dome, over an octagonal room. The house is furnished largely with Jefferson belongings, including a replica of the small portable desk on which he probably wrote the Declaration of Independence. Some of the clever devices in the residence are a 7-day calendar-clock and a dumbwaiter. One room contains one of the first parquet floors in the United States. The upper levels, accessible only by narrow staircases, are not shown to the public.

The mansion has 2½ stories above a basement and includes 35 rooms. The standout feature is the central dome above an octagonal room. The house is mostly filled with Jefferson's belongings, including a replica of the small portable desk he likely used to write the Declaration of Independence. Some of the innovative features in the home are a 7-day calendar clock and a dumbwaiter. One room has one of the first parquet floors in the United States. The upper levels, which can only be reached by narrow staircases, are not open to the public.

Before Jefferson built Monticello, every plantation had a group of small outbuildings such as the laundry, smokehouse, dairy, stable, weaving house, schoolhouse, and kitchen. Jefferson sought to render these as inconspicuous as possible and increase the efficiency of the facilities they provided by constructing two series of rooms for these purposes beneath the outer sides of two long L-shaped terraces extending from the house. Below the south terrace, beyond the angle of the ell, are the kitchen, the cook’s room, servants’ rooms, room for smoking meat, and the dairy. At the end of this terrace, stands “Honeymoon Cottage.” Under the far side of the north terrace are the stables, carriage house, icehouse, and laundry. Jefferson used the small building terminating this terrace, adjacent to which is the paddock, as an office. An underground passageway—containing storage rooms for wine, beer, cider, and rum—connects the basement of the main house with the series of service rooms along the outer sides of the ells. Jefferson is buried in the family graveyard, which is adjacent to the road leading from the house.

Before Jefferson built Monticello, every plantation had a set of small outbuildings like the laundry, smokehouse, dairy, stable, weaving house, schoolhouse, and kitchen. Jefferson aimed to make these as unobtrusive as possible and improve the efficiency of the facilities by creating two series of rooms for these functions under the outer sides of two long L-shaped terraces extending from the house. Below the south terrace, beyond the angle of the ell, are the kitchen, the cook’s room, servants’ rooms, a room for smoking meat, and the dairy. At the end of this terrace is “Honeymoon Cottage.” On the far side of the north terrace are the stables, carriage house, icehouse, and laundry. Jefferson utilized the small building at the end of this terrace, next to which is the paddock, as an office. An underground passageway—containing storage rooms for wine, beer, cider, and rum—connects the basement of the main house with the series of service rooms along the outer sides of the ells. Jefferson is buried in the family graveyard, which is next to the road leading from the house.

Upon Jefferson’s death in 1826, his daughter Martha inherited Monticello, but was soon forced to sell it, to the first of a series of private owners. In 1923 the newly organized Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation purchased the estate, the following year opened it to the public, and has retained ownership to the present day.

Upon Jefferson’s death in 1826, his daughter Martha inherited Monticello, but she quickly had to sell it to the first of a series of private owners. In 1923, the newly formed Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation purchased the estate, opened it to the public the following year, and has owned it ever since.


246

246

Mount Airy, Virginia  ∆

Location: Richmond County, on the north side of U.S. 360, about 1½ miles west of Warsaw.

Location: Richmond County, on the north side of U.S. 360, approximately 1.5 miles west of Warsaw.

Francis Lightfoot Lee resided in this beautiful mansion for a short time in 1769, while its owner, his new father-in-law, Col. John Tayloe, completed building Menokin nearby as a residence for him and his bride.

Francis Lightfoot Lee lived in this beautiful mansion for a brief period in 1769, while its owner, his new father-in-law, Col. John Tayloe, finished constructing Menokin nearby as a home for him and his wife.

Mount Airy, which sits on a ridge overlooking the Rappahannock Valley, is one of the finest late Georgian mansions to be erected in America. Built in the years 1758–62, it is attributed to noted Virginia architect John Ariss, and is considered to be his best work. It was the first residence in the English Colonies to carry out completely a full five-part Palladian villa plan: a main house connected to two dependencies by quadrant passageways that partially enclose a forecourt. The massive main section, standing over an elevated basement, and the two dependencies are two stories high and of dark brown sandstone construction trimmed in light-colored limestone. The one-story passageways curve from the main house to the dependencies and enclose a semicircular forecourt on the north, or entrance, facade.

Mount Airy, which is perched on a ridge overlooking the Rappahannock Valley, is one of the finest late Georgian mansions built in America. Constructed between 1758 and 1762, it's attributed to the famous Virginia architect John Ariss and is considered his best work. It was the first home in the English Colonies to fully implement a complete five-part Palladian villa design: a main house connected to two outbuildings by quartered passageways that partially surround a front courtyard. The large main section, which stands over an elevated basement, along with the two outbuildings, are two stories high and made of dark brown sandstone with light-colored limestone trim. The one-story passageways curve from the main house to the outbuildings and create a semicircular courtyard on the north, or entrance, side.

Mount Airy.

Prominent characteristics of the main building are front and rear central projecting pavilions of rusticated limestone, both having loggias, three windows in the second story, and crowning triangular pediments; limestone belt course; rusticated angle quoins; and two pairs of interior chimneys near the ridge of the hip roof, which was247 rebuilt after a fire in 1844 and may have replaced a hip-on-hip roof. The four square piers gracing the front loggia are faced with Roman Doric pilasters. The rear loggia has three round arches topped with heavy, marked, voussoired keystones.

Prominent features of the main building include the central projecting pavilions at the front and back made of rough limestone, both featuring loggias, three windows on the second floor, and topped with triangular pediments; a limestone belt course; rough corner quoins; and two pairs of interior chimneys close to the ridge of the hip roof, which was 247 rebuilt after a fire in 1844 and might have replaced a hip-on-hip roof. The four square piers embellishing the front loggia are covered with Roman Doric pilasters. The rear loggia has three round arches topped with heavy, defined, voussoired keystones.

The two dependencies have hip roofs and central chimneys, and their corner quoins match those of the main house. The connecting passageways, also of stone, are covered with shed roofs concealed from the front. At the point where they connect with the main house, which rests on an elevated basement, they are stepped up to allow entrance to the first floor.

The two side buildings have sloped roofs and central chimneys, and their corner stones match those of the main house. The connecting pathways, also made of stone, are topped with shed roofs hidden from view in the front. Where they connect with the main house, which sits on a raised basement, they are stepped up to provide access to the first floor.

Fire destroyed the probably fine wooden interiors in 1844, but the original floor plan was retained in the reconstruction. A magnificent central hall extends through the house between the front and rear loggias. Full-height windows flank both central entrance doors. The elliptical stairway in the front northwest corner room, in which there is also a pantry, dates from the 19th century, but the original stairs may have been in the present cross hall between the two east drawing rooms, lighted by the central arch of a Palladian window in the east end wall. In the southwest corner is a large dining room.

Fire destroyed what were likely beautiful wooden interiors in 1844, but the original floor plan was kept in the rebuild. A stunning central hall runs through the house between the front and back loggias. Full-height windows are on either side of both main entrance doors. The elliptical staircase in the front northwest corner room, which also has a pantry, is from the 19th century, but the original stairs may have been in the current cross hall between the two eastern drawing rooms, which is lit by the central arch of a Palladian window on the east end wall. In the southwest corner, there is a large dining room.

Mount Airy, in good condition, is still used as a residence by Tayloe descendants and is not open to the public. Francis Lightfoot Lee is buried with his wife in the Tayloe family cemetery, located about 300 yards northwest of the mansion.

Mount Airy, in good shape, is still used as a home by the Tayloe descendants and isn’t open to the public. Francis Lightfoot Lee is buried with his wife in the Tayloe family cemetery, which is about 300 yards northwest of the mansion.


Nelson House (Colonial National Historical Park), Virginia  ‎☑

Location: York County, northwest corner of Main and Pearl Streets, Yorktown; address: Colonial National Historical Park, P.O. Box 210, Yorktown, Va. 23490.

Location: York County, at the northwest corner of Main and Pearl Streets, Yorktown; address: Colonial National Historical Park, P.O. Box 210, Yorktown, VA 23490.

Thomas Nelson, Jr., may have been born in this house in 1738, resided fulltime in it from 1767 until 1781, and probably stayed in it on occasion during the following 8 years prior to his death. During the latter period, he was living in partial retirement at his Hanover County estate, Offley Hoo.

Thomas Nelson, Jr., might have been born in this house in 1738, lived in it full time from 1767 until 1781, and probably stayed there occasionally during the next 8 years before he died. During that time, he was living in semi-retirement at his Hanover County estate, Offley Hoo.

The probable builder, between 1732 and 1741, was Thomas (“Scotch Tom”) Nelson, Sr., the signer’s grandfather. Thomas Jr.’s father, William, lived in the residence until about 1738, the year of his marriage, when he moved to his own house across the street.248 Thomas, Jr., could have been born at either place. After “Scotch Tom” died, in 1745, his widow continued in residence. Upon her death in 1766, Thomas, Jr., who since his marriage 4 years earlier had apparently lived with his father, acquired her home and moved in the next year.

The likely builder, between 1732 and 1741, was Thomas (“Scotch Tom”) Nelson, Sr., the signer’s grandfather. Thomas Jr.’s father, William, lived in the house until about 1738, the year he got married, when he moved to his own place across the street.248 Thomas Jr. could have been born at either location. After “Scotch Tom” passed away in 1745, his widow continued living there. When she died in 1766, Thomas Jr., who had apparently lived with his father since his marriage 4 years earlier, inherited her home and moved in the following year.

Nelson House.

According to family tradition, the Nelson House served as the second headquarters of Gen. Charles Cornwallis during the siege of Yorktown (September-October 1781), and with Nelson’s permission American artillery shelled and hit the house. The historical record indicates that both British and French military personnel likely used it, but their identities cannot be definitely ascertained. And the southeast face of the residence does show evidence of damage from cannon fire. The Marquis de Lafayette, who revisited the United States in 1824–25, was quartered there when in the former year he attended the celebration of the anniversary of the Battle of Yorktown, in which he had played a key role.

According to family tradition, the Nelson House was the second headquarters of General Charles Cornwallis during the siege of Yorktown (September-October 1781), and with Nelson’s permission, American artillery fired at and hit the house. Historical records suggest that both British and French military personnel likely used it, but their identities can’t be determined for sure. The southeast side of the house does show signs of damage from cannon fire. The Marquis de Lafayette, who revisited the United States in 1824–25, stayed there when he attended the anniversary celebration of the Battle of Yorktown the previous year, where he had played a significant role.

The Nelson House is an impressive specimen of early Georgian architecture, though the four south and five north dormers added in the 1920’s detract from the original design. The broad roof is gabled and pedimented at the ends, with two massive interior chimneys249 and strongly dentiled cornice. The Flemish bond brickwork includes gauged belt course, water table, and flat window arches with segmental soffits. Corner quoins, as well as the window sills and lintels and their tall keystones, are of stone. The quoins and two levels of tall windows give the house a strong vertical effect. The north center door has simple gauged and molded brick piers that are topped by a brick pediment. Destroying the symmetry of the south facade is the off-center door, enclosed in a vestibule. A more elaborate door on the west side is modern, replacing an original untrimmed service opening.

The Nelson House is an impressive example of early Georgian architecture, although the four dormers on the south and five on the north added in the 1920s take away from the original design. It features a broad gabled roof with pedimented ends and two large interior chimneys, along with a strongly dentiled cornice. The Flemish bond brickwork includes a gauged belt course, a water table, and flat window arches with segmental soffits. The corner quoins, as well as the window sills, lintels, and their tall keystones, are made of stone. The quoins and two levels of tall windows give the house a strong vertical look. The door in the center of the north side has simple gauged and molded brick piers topped by a brick pediment. The off-center door on the south facade, enclosed in a vestibule, disrupts the symmetry. A more elaborate door on the west side is modern, replacing an original untrimmed service opening.

On one side of the off-center hall are two small rooms, with a lobby and service stairs between them; on the opposite side of the hall, are two larger rooms, divided by a tiny one, probably a pantry. The general plan is repeated upstairs, where there are four bedrooms. Most of the original interior woodwork, highlighted by the first-floor wall-to-ceiling paneling, is still intact. From a decorative standpoint, the most striking chamber is the northeast drawing room. All the fireplaces in the residence are apparently reconstructions, as are also the balusters and handrails of the stairs.

On one side of the off-center hall are two small rooms, with a lobby and service stairs in between; on the opposite side of the hall are two larger rooms, separated by a tiny one, likely a pantry. The general layout is repeated upstairs, where there are four bedrooms. Most of the original interior woodwork, showcased by the first-floor wall-to-ceiling paneling, is still intact. From a decorative perspective, the most notable room is the northeast drawing room. All the fireplaces in the house seem to be reconstructions, as are the balusters and handrails of the stairs.

The house remained in possession of the Nelson family until 1914. In 1920–21 its owners rehabilitated and restored it and renamed it York Hall. In 1968 the National Park Service acquired it. When this volume went to press, an extensive research and restoration program was being carried out preparatory to opening the building to the public.

The house stayed with the Nelson family until 1914. In 1920–21, its owners renovated and restored it and renamed it York Hall. In 1968, the National Park Service took ownership. When this book was published, a major research and restoration project was underway in preparation for opening the building to the public.


Poplar Forest, Virginia  ∆

Location: Bedford County, on the east side of County Route 661, about 6½ miles west of Lynchburg.

Location: Bedford County, east side of County Route 661, approximately 6.5 miles west of Lynchburg.

In 1806–19 Thomas Jefferson designed and built this architecturally significant octagonal house on his 4,000-acre Bedford County plantation as a summer home and retreat. He occupied it intermittently until his death in 1826.

In 1806–19, Thomas Jefferson designed and built this architecturally significant octagonal house on his 4,000-acre Bedford County plantation as a summer home and retreat. He stayed there occasionally until his death in 1826.

The plantation came into the possession of Jefferson through Martha Wayles Skelton, whom he married in 1772. For many years, whenever he visited it to superintend its management, he resided in a two-room cottage, the only dwelling. In June 1781, just after abdicating250 the governorship and narrowly escaping capture with a group of legislators during a British raid on Charlottesville, he temporarily moved his family to the cottage. Before the month was out, a horse threw and injured him. During his recuperation, he wrote Notes on the State of Virginia, a study of social and political life in 18th-century Virginia. In 1806–19 he erected Poplar Forest, whose completion coincided with his retirement from public office. When visitors became too numerous at Monticello or the fancy struck, he took up residence at his retreat for a month or two, usually twice a year. As the years went on, he refined the structure.

The plantation became Jefferson's property when he married Martha Wayles Skelton in 1772. For many years, whenever he visited to oversee its management, he lived in a two-room cottage, the only place to stay. In June 1781, right after stepping down as governor and narrowly escaping capture with a group of legislators during a British raid on Charlottesville, he temporarily moved his family to the cottage. Before the month was over, a horse threw him off and injured him. While he was recovering, he wrote Notes on the State of Virginia, a study of social and political life in 18th-century Virginia. From 1806 to 1819, he built Poplar Forest, finishing it around the time he retired from public office. When too many visitors came to Monticello or he felt like getting away, he stayed at his retreat for a month or two, usually twice a year. As the years went by, he improved the structure.

Poplar Forest.

In 1845 a fire destroyed the roof and interior, leaving only the four chimneys, the brick walls, and possibly the portico columns. That same year, the present unadorned roof, octagonal and hipped like its predecessor, and dormers were added. Prior to the fire, there was a skylight and balustraded deck at the edge of the roof, with a Tuscan cornice below that extended around the building. The one-story brick building is set over a high basement. Because of the sloping ground on the rear side, the structure is two stories high there. One- and two-story tetrastyle Tuscan porticoes are attached to the front and rear of the house respectively. The front one is pedimented; the unpedimented rear one is built over a one-story arcade.

In 1845, a fire wiped out the roof and interior, leaving just the four chimneys, the brick walls, and possibly the portico columns. That same year, the current plain roof, which is octagonal and hipped like the original, along with dormers, was added. Before the fire, there was a skylight and a deck with a railing at the edge of the roof, featuring a Tuscan cornice below that wrapped around the building. The one-story brick structure sits on a high basement. Due to the sloping ground at the back, the building is two stories high there. The front and back of the house each have one- and two-story tetrastyle Tuscan porticoes. The front one has a pediment, while the back one, which doesn’t have a pediment, is built over a one-story arcade.

The original interior plan is unchanged. Four elongated octagonal rooms are grouped symmetrically around the present dining room, a square central room that was once lighted from above by the central skylight, not replaced in 1845. No aboveground traces remain of251 a flat-roofed office wing, referred to by Jefferson, but a kitchen and smokehouse still stand.

The original interior layout hasn't changed. Four long octagonal rooms are arranged symmetrically around the current dining room, a square central space that used to be lit from above by the central skylight, which wasn't replaced in 1845. There are no aboveground signs left of 251 a flat-roofed office wing mentioned by Jefferson, but the kitchen and smokehouse are still there.

Poplar Forest, in good condition, is a private residence and is not open to the public.

Poplar Forest, in good shape, is a private home and is not open to the public.


Stratford Hall, Virginia  ∆

Location: Westmoreland County, just north of Va. 214, about 1 mile northeast of Lerty.

Location: Westmoreland County, just north of Va. 214, approximately 1 mile northeast of Lerty.

This architecturally outstanding mansion along the Potomac River was the ancestral home of the Lee family. It was the birthplace and boyhood home of two signers of the Declaration of Independence, Richard Henry and Francis Lightfoot Lee, as well as their three distinguished brothers, Arthur, William, and Thomas Ludwell. A later resident was Col. Henry “Lighthorse Harry,” hero of the War for Independence. His son, Robert E., Confederate leader during the Civil War, was born in the house in 1807.

This architecturally impressive mansion along the Potomac River was the ancestral home of the Lee family. It was the birthplace and childhood home of two signers of the Declaration of Independence, Richard Henry and Francis Lightfoot Lee, as well as their three notable brothers, Arthur, William, and Thomas Ludwell. A later resident was Col. Henry “Lighthorse Harry,” a hero of the War for Independence. His son, Robert E., a Confederate leader during the Civil War, was born in the house in 1807.

Stratford Hall.

Thomas Lee—planter, merchant, shipowner, and politician—built the mansion in the years 1725–30 on his 16,000-acre plantation. Upon his death in 1750, the residence passed to his eldest son, Philip Ludwell. Meantime, Richard Henry had been born there in 1732 and Francis Lightfoot 2 years later. They maintained residence until 1757 and 1758 respectively, when they moved to their own estates. In 1782 Philip Ludwell’s oldest daughter, Matilda, wife of252 “Lighthorse Harry,” her cousin, inherited the mansion. In 1790 she died, and 3 years later her husband remarried. One of his sons by that union was Robert E. Lee, who lived in the house only 3 or 4 years, at the end of which his parents moved to Alexandria.

Thomas Lee—planter, merchant, shipowner, and politician—built the mansion between 1725 and 1730 on his 16,000-acre plantation. After his death in 1750, the home was passed down to his oldest son, Philip Ludwell. During that time, Richard Henry was born there in 1732, followed by Francis Lightfoot two years later. They lived there until 1757 and 1758, respectively, when they moved to their own estates. In 1782, Philip Ludwell’s oldest daughter, Matilda, who was married to “Lighthorse Harry,” her cousin, inherited the mansion. She died in 1790, and three years later, her husband remarried. One of his sons from that marriage was Robert E. Lee, who lived in the house for only 3 or 4 years before his parents moved to Alexandria.

Stratford Hall is a magnificent and rare example of an H-shaped residence and illustrates the transition from the 17th-century William and Mary style of architecture to early Georgian. The mansion is one story high over an elevated basement and has a hip roof. Variations in color and size between the Flemish bond brickwork in the basement and upper story soften the austerity of the bold mass of the house. In the central connecting arm, the flights of stone steps leading up to the north and south entrances, which diminish in width as they ascend to the main floor level and are flanked by ponderous balustrades, are conjectural reconstructions, erected in 1929. Twin sets of four huge chimney stacks are centered over the east and west wings. The stacks are connected by arches and encompass balustraded roof decks, from which the Lees could view navigation on the Potomac River.

Stratford Hall is a stunning and unique example of an H-shaped home, showcasing the shift from 17th-century William and Mary architecture to early Georgian style. The mansion stands one story above an elevated basement and features a hip roof. The difference in color and size between the Flemish bond brickwork in the basement and the upper story softens the bold appearance of the house. In the central connecting arm, the stone steps leading up to the north and south entrances narrow as they rise to the main floor. These steps, flanked by heavy balustrades, were speculative reconstructions added in 1929. Twin sets of four large chimney stacks sit at the center of the east and west wings. The stacks are linked by arches and include balustraded roof decks, providing the Lees a view of navigation on the Potomac River.

“Lighthorse Harry” Lee made many changes. By 1800 he had altered or replaced the exterior stairs and changed most of the interior trim, except that in the central block’s great hall, to the Adam style. The floor plan is unusual in colonial dwellings. The two wings each have four rooms, divided laterally by a central hallway on the main floor. The connecting central block consists of the fully paneled great hall, or salon—one of the most formal and monumental rooms of the early Georgian period in the English Colonies. The basement contains service rooms and some bedrooms; the main floor, living quarters and bedrooms. In the east wing’s dining room is a service alcove, common in Virginia mansions. The 18th-century stairway was removed during the 1929 restoration. The only access between floors is now a small stairway in the east wing.

“Lighthorse Harry” Lee made many updates. By 1800, he had changed or replaced the exterior stairs and remodeled most of the interior trim, except for the great hall in the central block, to the Adam style. The layout is unusual for colonial homes. Each of the two wings has four rooms, separated by a central hallway on the main floor. The central block connects the fully paneled great hall, or salon—one of the most formal and impressive rooms from the early Georgian period in the English Colonies. The basement has service rooms and some bedrooms; the main floor has living areas and bedrooms. In the dining room of the east wing, there's a service alcove, which is common in Virginia mansions. The 18th-century staircase was taken out during the 1929 restoration. The only way to go between floors now is a small staircase in the east wing.

The mansion is built in the center of a square parterre, a service building being located at each corner of the square. Flanking the entrance forecourt are the kitchen and library, 1½-story brick structures with jerkin-head roofs. At the rear corners are a school and office, with hip roofs. Outside the square are balanced brick buildings: a stable on one side and smokehouse on the other. Seven of the 12 original structures that were still standing in 1929 have been restored. They provide an excellent picture of plantation life253 in the 18th century. Farther removed from the house, near the wharf on the river, is the reconstructed mill.

The mansion sits in the middle of a square garden, with a service building at each corner of the square. On either side of the entrance courtyard are the kitchen and library, both 1½-story brick buildings featuring jerkin-head roofs. At the back corners are a school and an office, topped with hip roofs. Outside the square, there are balanced brick buildings: a stable on one side and a smokehouse on the other. Seven of the 12 original structures that were still standing in 1929 have been restored. They offer a great glimpse into plantation life253 in the 18th century. Further away from the house, near the wharf on the river, is the reconstructed mill.

In 1929 the Robert E. Lee Memorial Foundation, Inc., acquired the mansion and 1,100 acres. Besides reconstructing the exterior stairs, the foundation restored the library and library closet in the west wing, as well as the dining room and service alcove in the east wing, to their 18th-century appearance. The east and west corridors, parlor in the west wing, Robert E. Lee’s birthplace room, and an adjoining bedroom in the east wing were left as they appeared about 1800. The formal garden, just east of the mansion, has also been restored. The foundation today operates Stratford Hall as a historic house museum.

In 1929, the Robert E. Lee Memorial Foundation, Inc. acquired the mansion and 1,100 acres. In addition to rebuilding the exterior stairs, the foundation restored the library and library closet in the west wing, along with the dining room and service alcove in the east wing, to reflect their 18th-century style. The east and west corridors, the parlor in the west wing, Robert E. Lee’s birthplace room, and an adjoining bedroom in the east wing were preserved to look like they did around 1800. The formal garden, located just east of the mansion, has also been restored. Today, the foundation operates Stratford Hall as a historic house museum.


Tuckahoe, Virginia  ∆

Location: Goochland County, on the south side of Va. 650, about 13 miles west of Richmond.

Location: Goochland County, on the south side of Va. 650, about 13 miles west of Richmond.

Tuckahoe, situated along the James River, was the boyhood home of Thomas Jefferson for 7 years and the place where he obtained his elementary education. The mansion, outbuildings, and surrounding254 gardens and lands constitute an outstanding example of a Southern colonial plantation.

Tuckahoe, located by the James River, was Thomas Jefferson's childhood home for 7 years and where he got his early education. The mansion, outbuildings, and the gardens and land around it represent a remarkable example of a Southern colonial plantation. 254

Tuckahoe.

The land on which Tuckahoe stands was patented in 1695 by William Randolph. His son Thomas inherited the plantation and built the north wing of the mansion about 1712. Sometime between 1730 and 1745, William Randolph II enlarged the residence to its present proportions. When Randolph died in 1745, Peter Jefferson moved his family, including 2-year-old Thomas, from Shadwell to Tuckahoe to fulfill a promise Peter had made to Randolph, his wife’s cousin, to act as guardian of his son, Thomas Mann Randolph. In 1752 the Jeffersons returned to Shadwell.

The land where Tuckahoe is located was patented in 1695 by William Randolph. His son Thomas inherited the plantation and built the north wing of the mansion around 1712. Between 1730 and 1745, William Randolph II expanded the residence to its current size. When Randolph passed away in 1745, Peter Jefferson moved his family, including 2-year-old Thomas, from Shadwell to Tuckahoe to keep a promise he had made to Randolph, who was his wife’s cousin, to be the guardian of his son, Thomas Mann Randolph. In 1752, the Jeffersons moved back to Shadwell.

Like Stratford Hall, the house is an outstanding and rare example of an H-shaped structure of early Georgian style in the Colonies. It is a large, two-story frame structure lined with brick nogging and exterior weatherboarded walls, except for the two solid brick ends of the south wing. Two long gabled wings are connected by a broad central block. Tall slender chimneys accentuate the narrow gable ends and the marked verticality of the structure, which is further enhanced by the high brick foundations. The chimneys in the frame ends of the north wing project, but those in the south brick ends are flush with the walls. The second-floor level is marked by a wooden belt course and the roofline by a modillioned cornice.

Like Stratford Hall, this house is an exceptional and rare example of an H-shaped structure in early Georgian style in the Colonies. It features a large, two-story frame design with brick nogging and weatherboarded exterior walls, except for the two solid brick ends of the south wing. Two long gabled wings connect through a broad central block. Tall, slender chimneys emphasize the narrow gable ends and the overall verticality of the structure, which is further highlighted by the tall brick foundations. The chimneys in the frame ends of the north wing project outward, while those in the south brick ends are flush with the walls. The second-floor level is defined by a wooden belt course, and the roofline is marked by a modillioned cornice.

The central doorways on the north and south sides have low porches with square posts supporting gable roofs. The south porch is approached by a long flight of stone steps, splayed but lacking a balustrade; the north porch is near ground level. The doors in the center block, on the east and west elevations, are sheltered by pedimented hoods. All four exterior doors, one in each wing and two in the central block, are original, as are also the weatherboarding and sash.

The main doorways on the north and south sides have low porches with square posts that hold up gable roofs. The south porch is reached by a long set of stone steps that are wide but don’t have a railing; the north porch is close to the ground. The doors in the center block, on the east and west sides, are protected by pedimented hoods. All four exterior doors, one in each wing and two in the central block, are original, as well as the weatherboarding and sash.

On the first floor of each of the wings are two rooms, divided by a center cross hall. The north wing contains two parlors; the south, a dining room and “children’s” room. The central connecting block contains one large room, or salon. The second floor repeats the plan of the first floor except that, of the original five bedrooms, the one in the central block has been modernized and subdivided into several rooms.

On the first floor of each wing, there are two rooms separated by a central hallway. The north wing has two sitting rooms, while the south wing has a dining room and a “children’s” room. The central connecting area features one large room, or salon. The second floor follows the same layout as the first floor, but the original five bedrooms have been revamped, with the one in the central area updated and divided into several rooms.

The interior decoration and trim, of the finest workmanship, is remarkably unaltered and in fine condition. All the walls are covered255 with simple paneling. The original wide floorboards remain throughout the structure. The hall stairways, especially the north one, with elaborately turned and spiraled balusters, are outstanding examples of early Georgian style. Mantels throughout the house date from the 19th century, but the marble fireplace facing in the west bedroom of the north wing is original.

The interior decoration and trim, crafted with exceptional skill, are impressively intact and in great condition. All the walls are covered255 with simple paneling. The original wide floorboards are preserved throughout the building. The hall stairways, especially the one on the north side, featuring intricately turned and spiraled balusters, are excellent examples of early Georgian style. The mantels in the house date back to the 19th century, but the marble fireplace in the west bedroom of the north wing is original.

East of the mansion is the small, one-room, brick, one-story schoolhouse attended by Jefferson, as well as fine boxwood gardens. A short distance to the west of the main house is a plantation street, containing a complex of eight early 18th-century buildings, all in excellent condition and little altered. They include kitchen, tobacco house, three slave quarters, smokehouse, and barn.

East of the mansion is a small, one-room brick schoolhouse that Jefferson attended, along with beautiful boxwood gardens. A short distance to the west of the main house is a plantation street, featuring a group of eight early 18th-century buildings, all in great shape and mostly unchanged. These include a kitchen, tobacco house, three slave quarters, smokehouse, and barn.

Since Tuckahoe passed out of the possession of the Randolph family in 1830, a succession of individuals have owned it. It is still a private residence, not open to the public.

Since Tuckahoe left the Randolph family in 1830, it has had a series of owners. It remains a private home and is not open to the public.


Wythe House, Virginia  ∆

Location: On the west side of the Palace Green, between Duke of Gloucester and Prince George Streets, Williamsburg.

Location: On the west side of Palace Green, between Duke of Gloucester Street and Prince George Street, Williamsburg.

This house in Colonial Williamsburg is a superb example of a Georgian brick house. It was the residence of George Wythe from around 1755 until 1791, a period that spanned some of his most active years in politics and jurisprudence. His father-in-law, the noted Virginia architect Richard Taliaferro, designed and built it for him and his second wife about 1755. When Taliaferro died two decades later, Wythe inherited it and resided in it until 1791, when he moved to Richmond. A decade earlier, the house had served as Gen. George Washington’s headquarters prior to the siege of Yorktown.

This house in Colonial Williamsburg is a great example of a Georgian brick house. It was home to George Wythe from around 1755 until 1791, covering some of his busiest years in politics and law. His father-in-law, the famous Virginia architect Richard Taliaferro, designed and built it for him and his second wife around 1755. When Taliaferro passed away two decades later, Wythe inherited the house and lived in it until 1791, when he moved to Richmond. A decade earlier, the house had been used as General George Washington’s headquarters before the siege of Yorktown.

The outstanding aspects of the little-altered early Georgian structure are its good lines and fine brickwork, in Flemish bond. It is two stories high over a basement and has a hip roof and two interior chimneys. Smaller windows on the upper level create an illusion that the modestly sized house is larger than it actually is. The simple facade is enriched mainly by the broad muntins and wide frames of the windows and a fine paneled double door with rectangular256 transom. The flat window arches are constructed of gauged brick. Windows, doors, and house corners have rubbed dressings, and a modillioned cornice decorates the eaveline.

The main features of the little-changed early Georgian building are its elegant lines and quality brickwork in Flemish bond. It stands two stories tall above a basement and has a hip roof with two internal chimneys. The smaller windows on the upper floor give the impression that the relatively small house is actually larger than it is. The straightforward facade is enhanced mainly by the broad muntins and wide frames of the windows, along with a beautifully paneled double door that has a rectangular256 transom. The flat window arches are made of gauged brick. The windows, doors, and corners of the house feature rubbed dressings, and a cornice with modillions adorns the eaves.

Wythe House.

Each floor consists of four rooms bisected into pairs by a central hall. Chimneys between each of the pairs afford fireplaces for all eight rooms. The handsome but unpretentious stairway contains the only elaborate woodwork. Plaster dadoes, however, are found in every room, with chair rails on plasterboard, and single molded cornices. On the first floor are study, parlor, students’ room, and dining room; on the second, four bedrooms. The existing mantels are replacements. Furnishings are of the late 18th century or earlier and represent American craftmanship. Extending behind the house is the formal garden; along the north, the kitchen, smokehouse, laundry, lumberhouse, and stable.

Each floor has four rooms divided into pairs by a central hallway. Chimneys between each pair provide fireplaces for all eight rooms. The attractive but simple staircase features the only detailed woodwork. Plaster dadoes are present in every room, with chair rails on plasterboard and single molded cornices. The first floor includes a study, parlor, student room, and dining room; the second floor has four bedrooms. The existing mantels have been replaced. The furnishings are from the late 18th century or earlier and showcase American craftsmanship. Behind the house is a formal garden, and along the north side are the kitchen, smokehouse, laundry, lumberhouse, and stable.

In 1926, when Bruton Parish acquired the residence, it was in poor condition. By 1931 the parish had repaired and restored it, and utilized it as a parish house for 6 years. Colonial Williamsburg then acquired it, and in 1939–40 accomplished additional restoration. Today the building is one of the main attractions at Colonial Williamsburg and is part of Williamsburg Historic District, a National Historic Landmark.

In 1926, when Bruton Parish bought the house, it was in bad shape. By 1931, the parish had fixed it up and used it as a parish house for six years. Colonial Williamsburg then took it over, and in 1939–40, they did more restoration work. Today, the building is one of the main attractions at Colonial Williamsburg and is part of the Williamsburg Historic District, a National Historic Landmark.


257

257

Appendix
The Declaration and Its History

259

259

Text of the Declaration

Text of the Declaration

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776.

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

When human events make it necessary for one group of people to break the political ties that connect them with another, and to take their place among the powers of the earth as a separate and equal entity entitled to by the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God, it’s respectful to the opinions of others to explain the reasons for their decision to separate.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.——That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.——That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are260 more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.——Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

We hold these truths to be obvious: that all people are created equal, that they are granted by their Creator certain unalienable Rights, which include Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. — To protect these rights, Governments are created among People, deriving their legitimate powers from the consent of the governed. — Whenever any form of Government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the Right of the People to change or abolish it, and to establish a new Government, building its foundation on principles and organizing its powers in such a way that seems most likely to ensure their Safety and Happiness. Prudence will suggest that long-established Governments should not be changed for trivial and fleeting reasons; and all experience has shown that people are more likely to endure, while evils are tolerable, than to correct themselves by getting rid of the institutions they are used to. But when a long history of abuses and usurpations, constantly pursuing the same objective, reveals an intent to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, and their duty, to throw off such Government and to provide new safeguards for their future security. — Such has been the patient suffering of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity that compels them to change their previous Systems of Government. The history of the current King of Great Britain is one of repeated injuries and usurpations, all aimed at establishing an absolute Tyranny over these States. To demonstrate this, let the Facts be presented to an honest world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has denied his approval to laws that are essential and beneficial for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has prohibited his Governors from making laws that are urgent and important unless their enforcement is paused until he gives his approval; and when they are paused, he has completely ignored them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has refused to create other laws to help large groups of people unless those people give up their right to be represented in the Legislature, a right that is invaluable to them and only intimidating to tyrants.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has summoned legislative bodies to unusual, uncomfortable, and far-off locations from where their public records are kept, solely to wear them down into agreeing with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has repeatedly dissolved Representative Houses for standing up firmly against his attacks on the people's rights.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has long refused to facilitate the election of others after such dissolutions, which has led the legislative powers, unable to be destroyed, to revert back to the people as a whole for their use. In the meantime, the state remains vulnerable to external invasions and internal upheaval.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has tried to limit the population of these States by blocking the laws for naturalizing foreigners, refusing to create new laws to encourage their immigration here, and making it harder to gain access to new land.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has hindered the administration of justice by refusing to approve laws that establish judicial powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has made judges dependent solely on his will for the length of their terms and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has set up numerous new offices and sent over a bunch of officers to annoy our people and drain their resources.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has maintained, in peaceful times, Standing Armies without the approval of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He pretends to make the military independent and above the civil authority.

261 He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

261 He has teamed up with others to put us under a legal system that's not recognized by our constitution and ignored by our laws, approving their actions of fake legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For housing large groups of armed soldiers among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

To protect them, through a fake trial, from any punishment for murders they might commit against the residents of these states:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For stopping our trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For imposing taxes on us without our consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For taking away the benefits of a trial by jury in many cases:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For taking us overseas to be tried for made-up offenses:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

To get rid of the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, set up an arbitrary government there, and expand its boundaries to make it both an example and a suitable tool for bringing the same absolute rule to these colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For taking away our charters, getting rid of our most important laws, and fundamentally changing the structure of our governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

For shutting down our own Legislatures and claiming the authority to make laws for us in every situation.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has given up control of the government here by declaring us outside of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He has robbed our seas, devastated our coasts, burned our towns, and ruined the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He is currently bringing in large armies of foreign mercenaries to finish the work of death, destruction, and oppression that has already started, characterized by cruelty and betrayal that are almost unmatched in the darkest times, and completely unworthy of the leader of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has forced our fellow citizens captured on the high seas to fight against their own country, to become the executioners of their friends and relatives, or to be killed by them.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

He has stirred up rebellions among us and has tried to bring the ruthless Native Americans from our borders into the conflict, whose way of fighting is to indiscriminately destroy people of all ages, genders, and circumstances.

In every stage of these Oppressions we have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

At every point in these injustices, we have asked for help in the most respectful way: our repeated requests have only been met with more harm. A leader whose actions clearly show he is a Tyrant is unfit to govern a free people.

Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation,262 and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We have also shown our British brothers plenty of attention. We have warned them repeatedly about their government's attempts to impose unjust control over us. We have reminded them about why we emigrated and settled here. We have appealed to their sense of fairness and generosity, and we've urged them, as family, to reject these overreachings that would surely disrupt our ties and communication. But they have ignored the calls for justice and family connection. Therefore, we have no choice but to accept the necessity that leads us to separate from them,262 and regard them, like everyone else, as Enemies in War, but Friends in Peace.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the fairness of our intentions, do, in the name and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare that these United Colonies are, and of right should be, Free and Independent States; that they are freed from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is and should be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full power to wage war, make peace, form alliances, establish trade, and do all other acts and things which Independent States may rightfully do.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

And to support this Declaration, with a strong reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we each commit to one another our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.


History of the Document

The best known of all the copies of the Declaration of Independence is the parchment copy, engrossed by Timothy Matlack. This one, signed by 56 Delegates of the Continental Congress on and after August 2, 1776, is displayed today in Exhibition Hall at the National Archives Building. Jefferson’s final draft of the Declaration, known as the “rough draft,” cumulatively bearing the corrections, amendments, and deletions of the drafting committee and of Congress as a whole, as well as Jefferson’s marginal and textual notes, is preserved among the Jefferson Papers at the Library of Congress. The revised draft, adopted by the Delegates on July 4, 1776, and signed only by John Hancock and Charles Thomson, President and Secretary of the Continental Congress, is known as the broadside copy. It was sent to the printer and has never been located. Sixteen copies of the printed broadside have survived. In addition to the “rough draft,” as least six other handwritten contemporary copies of the Declaration, one fragmentary, have survived and are in various archival collections. Five were made by Jefferson and one by John Adams.

The most famous version of the Declaration of Independence is the parchment copy created by Timothy Matlack. This version, signed by 56 Delegates of the Continental Congress on and after August 2, 1776, is currently displayed in the Exhibition Hall at the National Archives Building. Jefferson’s final draft of the Declaration, often referred to as the “rough draft,” includes all the corrections, amendments, and deletions made by the drafting committee and Congress as a whole, along with Jefferson’s notes in the margins and text. This draft is stored among the Jefferson Papers at the Library of Congress. The revised draft, which the Delegates approved on July 4, 1776, and was signed only by John Hancock and Charles Thomson, the President and Secretary of the Continental Congress, is known as the broadside copy. It was sent to the printer but has never been found. Sixteen copies of the printed broadside still exist. Besides the “rough draft,” at least six other handwritten copies of the Declaration, one of which is incomplete, are preserved in various archival collections. Five of these were made by Jefferson, and one by John Adams.

The history of the parchment copy of the Declaration is fascinating. From 1776 until 1789, along with other important national papers, it was safeguarded by Secretary of Congress Thomson, who263 carried it with him as Congress, at first to escape British troops and later for other reasons, convened in various cities: Philadelphia, Baltimore, Lancaster, York, Princeton, Trenton, Annapolis, and New York.

The history of the parchment copy of the Declaration is fascinating. From 1776 until 1789, along with other important national documents, it was kept safe by Secretary of Congress Thomson, who263 carried it with him as Congress, initially to avoid British troops and later for other reasons, met in various cities: Philadelphia, Baltimore, Lancaster, York, Princeton, Trenton, Annapolis, and New York.

When the Constitution took effect in 1789 and Thomson left office, he relinquished the Declaration to the newly created Department of State, which was under the temporary stewardship of Acting Secretary John Jay. Its offices were in New York’s old City Hall (Federal Hall). The next March, Thomas Jefferson became the first Secretary of State and custodian of the instrument he had created. Later that year, Philadelphia became the seat of the Federal Government and the Declaration returned to its birthplace. There it remained for a decade, until 1800, when the Government moved to the new national Capital of Washington.

When the Constitution went into effect in 1789 and Thomson left his position, he handed over the Declaration to the newly established Department of State, which was temporarily led by Acting Secretary John Jay. Its offices were located in New York’s old City Hall (Federal Hall). The following March, Thomas Jefferson became the first Secretary of State and the custodian of the document he had created. Later that year, Philadelphia became the capital of the Federal Government, and the Declaration returned to where it was originally signed. It stayed there for ten years, until 1800, when the Government relocated to the new national Capital of Washington.

Secretary of State John Marshall apparently at first stored the Declaration in his Department’s temporary offices in the old Treasury Building, at 15th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., and possibly then at Seven Buildings, 19th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW. After a few months, likely in 1801, the document was transferred to the War Office Building, at 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., where the Department of State moved its offices. The Declaration remained there until the summer of 1814, during the War of 1812, when British troops invaded the Capital. Shortly before they arrived, Secretary of State James Monroe packed the instrument and other state papers in linen sacks and sent them by wagon to a barn on the Virginia side of the Potomac 2 miles above Chain Bridge for one night, and then to a clergyman’s home in Leesburg, Va. Within a few weeks, after the British threat had subsided, the documents were brought back to Washington and probably temporarily kept in various structures because of the burning of the War Office Building by the British.

Secretary of State John Marshall initially stored the Declaration in his department’s temporary offices in the old Treasury Building at 15th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW, and possibly later at Seven Buildings, 19th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW. After a few months, likely in 1801, the document was moved to the War Office Building at 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW, where the Department of State had relocated its offices. The Declaration stayed there until the summer of 1814, during the War of 1812, when British troops invaded the Capital. Just before they arrived, Secretary of State James Monroe packed the document and other state papers in linen sacks and sent them by wagon to a barn on the Virginia side of the Potomac, 2 miles above Chain Bridge, for one night, and then to a clergyman’s home in Leesburg, Va. Within a few weeks, after the British threat had lessened, the documents were returned to Washington and likely kept temporarily in various buildings due to the War Office Building being burned by the British.

In 1820 the Department of State moved the Declaration to its headquarters at 15th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW. Stored for years in scroll fashion, the document had already been damaged by numerous unrollings, other handling, and frequent moves. In the period 1820–23 the use of a “wet” copying process to produce a facsimile apparently divested the parchment of some of its ink, especially that of the signatures.

In 1820, the Department of State relocated the Declaration to its headquarters at 15th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW. Having been stored for years in a rolled-up manner, the document had already suffered damage from repeated unrolling, handling, and frequent relocations. Between 1820 and 1823, using a “wet” copy process to create a facsimile apparently removed some of the ink from the parchment, particularly the signatures.

Subsequently the Declaration remained relatively undisturbed264 until 1841, when Secretary of State Daniel Webster, concluding that it should be on public view, ordered that it be mounted, framed, and moved to the newly constructed Patent Office, in the block bounded by Seventh, Ninth, F, and G Streets NW. The Patent Office was then part of the Department of State. Placed beside George Washington’s commission as commander in chief of the Continental Army in a large frame on a wall of the second floor hall opposite a window, for 35 years the Declaration endured exposure to glare, summer heat, and winter cold. The text retained its legibility, but the parchment faded and yellowed, cracked and warped. Many of the signatures had faded, some becoming blurred or almost invisible.

After that, the Declaration stayed mostly untouched264 until 1841, when Secretary of State Daniel Webster decided it should be displayed to the public. He ordered it to be mounted, framed, and moved to the newly built Patent Office, located in the block between Seventh, Ninth, F, and G Streets NW. At that time, the Patent Office was part of the Department of State. It was placed next to George Washington’s commission as commander in chief of the Continental Army in a large frame on the second floor hall wall, opposite a window. For 35 years, the Declaration faced bright glare, summer heat, and winter chill. While the text remained readable, the parchment faded and turned yellow, cracked, and warped. Many of the signatures faded too, some becoming blurry or nearly invisible.

The Federal Government in 1876 lent the Declaration to the city of Philadelphia, site of the national Centennial Exposition. On July 4 Richard Henry Lee, grandson of the signer, read it publicly. It was then exhibited in a fireproof safe behind a plate glass window and seen by more people than ever before. Philadelphians, deploring its condition, fought to retain it and only reluctantly returned it to Washington. Heeding the outcry of those who had viewed the timeworn parchment, a Government commission studied the possibility of restoration and in time concluded that such an attempt might be damaging.

The Federal Government in 1876 loaned the Declaration to the city of Philadelphia, where the national Centennial Exposition was being held. On July 4, Richard Henry Lee, the grandson of one of the signers, read it publicly. It was then displayed in a fireproof safe behind a plate glass window and was seen by more people than ever before. Philadelphians, saddened by its condition, fought to keep it and only reluctantly returned it to Washington. Listening to the concerns of those who had seen the worn parchment, a Government commission looked into the possibility of restoring it and eventually determined that such an attempt could actually cause more harm.

Meantime, in 1877, as a safeguard the Declaration was moved from the Patent Office to a more fireproof building at 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW. shared by the State, War, and Navy Departments. It had narrowly escaped destruction, for only a few months later fire gutted the Patent Office. Finally, in 1894, for protection from the light, State Department officials sealed the 118-year-old sheet between two glass plates and locked it in a safe in the basement. There it lay, except for rare occasions, in darkness and unobserved for more than a quarter of a century.

In 1877, as a precaution, the Declaration was relocated from the Patent Office to a more fire-resistant building on 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW, which was shared by the State, War, and Navy Departments. It had just avoided destruction, as only a few months later, a fire destroyed the Patent Office. Finally, in 1894, to protect it from light, State Department officials sealed the 118-year-old document between two glass plates and stored it in a safe in the basement. There it remained, only rarely seen, in darkness and unnoticed for over twenty-five years.

In 1921 the Department of State, responding to the recommendation of a special commission, relinquished custodianship of the Declaration to the Library of Congress. The transfer was made personally by Herbert Putnam, the Librarian, using a library mail truck, a Model T Ford. At first he kept the document in his office. In 1924, however, he placed it together with the Constitution, on public exhibition in a bronze-and-marble shrine on the second floor. At this time, the Declaration was encased between heavy glass panes specially treated to keep out harmful rays of light.

In 1921, the Department of State, acting on a special commission's recommendation, gave up its responsibility for the Declaration and handed it over to the Library of Congress. Herbert Putnam, the Librarian, personally made the transfer using a library mail truck, a Model T Ford. Initially, he kept the document in his office. However, in 1924, he displayed it along with the Constitution in a bronze-and-marble shrine on the second floor. At that time, the Declaration was protected between heavy glass panels designed to block harmful light.

265 The Declaration and the Constitution remained there until the outbreak of World War II. On December 26, 1941, just 19 days after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, they left Washington under heavy guard by train en route to Fort Knox, Ky., where they arrived the following day. Specialists took advantage of the opportunity and cleaned and restored the Declaration to the maximum degree. In 1944 both it and the Constitution were taken back to the Library of Congress. They remained there until 1952, at which time a tank under military escort carried them to Washington’s National Archives Building, repository of the Nation’s permanent records, which are under the jurisdiction of the National Archives and Records Service of the U.S. General Services Administration.

265 The Declaration and the Constitution stayed in place until the start of World War II. On December 26, 1941, just 19 days after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, they were removed from Washington under heavy guard by train heading to Fort Knox, KY, where they arrived the next day. Specialists took the chance to clean and restore the Declaration as much as possible. In 1944, both documents were returned to the Library of Congress. They stayed there until 1952, when a tank, under military escort, transported them to Washington’s National Archives Building, which houses the Nation’s permanent records and is managed by the National Archives and Records Service of the U.S. General Services Administration.

Constitution Avenue entrance of the National Archives Building, Washington, D.C.

266

266

This marble shrine at the rear center of Exhibition Hall, National Archives Building, contains the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights.

267

267

* Sure! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Understood! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.Understood. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.Sure! Please provide the text you'd like modernized.

Still enshrined there today, along with thousands of other priceless national records, is the parchment copy of the Declaration. The massive bronze doors at the Constitution Avenue entrance to the building lead to the circular Exhibition Hall. At its rear center stands a marble shrine containing the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. They are sealed in helium-filled bronze and glass cases, screened from harmful light rays by special filters, and can be lowered within seconds into a large fireproof, shockproof, and bombproof vault.

Still preserved there today, along with thousands of other invaluable national records, is the parchment copy of the Declaration. The large bronze doors at the Constitution Avenue entrance to the building lead into the circular Exhibition Hall. At the back center is a marble shrine housing the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. They are sealed in helium-filled bronze and glass cases, protected from harmful light by special filters, and can be lowered within seconds into a large fireproof, shockproof, and bombproof vault.

The hall also features a “Formation of the Union” exhibit, a collection of documents illustrating the evolution of the U.S. Government from 1774 until 1791. They include the Articles of Association (1774), the Articles of Confederation (1777), the Treaty of Paris (1783), and Washington’s inaugural address (1789). Above the exhibits are two murals. In one, Jefferson is presenting the Declaration to John Hancock, President of the Continental Congress; in the other, James Madison is submitting the Constitution to George Washington, President of the Constitutional Convention.

The hall also features a “Formation of the Union” exhibit, a collection of documents showing how the U.S. Government developed from 1774 to 1791. They include the Articles of Association (1774), the Articles of Confederation (1777), the Treaty of Paris (1783), and Washington’s inaugural address (1789). Above the exhibits are two murals. In one, Jefferson is presenting the Declaration to John Hancock, President of the Continental Congress; in the other, James Madison is submitting the Constitution to George Washington, President of the Constitutional Convention.


268

268

Suggested Reading

BECKER, CARL L. The Declaration of Independence: A Study in the History of Political Ideas. New York: rev. ed., Harcourt, Brace, 1942. A classic and scholarly study, originally published in 1922, that analyzes the Declaration in terms of its political background, philosophical origins, and literary merit, and discusses subsequent reaction to it.

BECKER, CARL L. The Declaration of Independence: A Study in the History of Political Ideas. New York: rev. ed., Harcourt, Brace, 1942. A timeless and scholarly examination, initially published in 1922, that analyzes the Declaration within its political context, philosophical origins, and literary quality, while also discussing the reactions it provoked afterward.

BOYD, JULIAN P. The Declaration of Independence: The Evolution of the Text as Shown in Facsimiles of Various Drafts by Its Author, Thomas Jefferson. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1945. This valuable work is a revised edition of a study published by the Library of Congress in 1943 in connection with the bicentennial celebration of Jefferson’s birth. Examines the nature and evolution of the various drafts.

BOYD, JULIAN P. The Declaration of Independence: The Evolution of the Text as Shown in Facsimiles of Various Drafts by Its Author, Thomas Jefferson. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1945. This significant work is a revised edition of a study released by the Library of Congress in 1943 for the bicentennial celebration of Jefferson’s birth. It examines the nature and development of the various drafts.

BURNETT, EDMUND C. The Continental Congress. New York: Macmillan, 1941. Although written in a cumbersome style, this book remains one of the best on its subject. Includes chapters dealing with the events surrounding adoption of the Declaration.

BURNETT, EDMUND C. The Continental Congress. New York: Macmillan, 1941. Though written in a dense style, this book remains one of the best on the subject. It includes chapters covering the events surrounding the adoption of the Declaration.

DUMBAULD, EDWARD. The Declaration of Independence and What It Means Today. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Press, 1950. Phrase-by-phrase study of the contents of the document and differences in the several drafts. Also treats the underlying intellectual and political influences.

DUMBAULD, EDWARD. The Declaration of Independence and What It Means Today. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Press, 1950. A thorough analysis of the document's content, exploring the differences in its various drafts. It also discusses the foundational intellectual and political influences.

269 MALONE, DUMAS. The Story of the Declaration of Independence. New York: Oxford University Press, 1954. Enhancing this readable account of the early phases of the Revolution and biographical sketches of the signers is a fine collection of illustrations assembled by Hirst Milhollen and Milton Kaplan.

269 MALONE, DUMAS. The Story of the Declaration of Independence. New York: Oxford University Press, 1954. This captivating narrative of the early stages of the Revolution, along with biographical sketches of the signers, is enhanced by an excellent collection of illustrations compiled by Hirst Milhollen and Milton Kaplan.

McGEE, DOROTHY H. Famous Signers of the Declaration. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1955. One of a series oriented to young readers, this volume presents biographies of selected signers.

McGEE, DOROTHY H. Famous Signers of the Declaration. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1955. As part of a series aimed at young readers, this book provides biographies of notable signers.

NATIONAL ARCHIVES. The Formation of the Union. Washington: National Archives and Records Service (Pub. No. 70-13), 1970. A handsome but moderately priced brochure that consists of a brief history of the period 1774–91 and facsimiles of key documents.

NATIONAL ARCHIVES. The Formation of the Union. Washington: National Archives and Records Service (Pub. No. 70-13), 1970. A well-made yet affordable brochure that includes a brief history of the period 1774–91 and reproductions of significant documents.

WHITNEY, DAVID C. Founders of Freedom in America: Lives of the Men Who Signed the Declaration of Independence and So Helped to Establish the United States of America. Chicago: J. G. Ferguson, 1964. This superbly illustrated work is one of the best popular versions of the events of the Revolutionary period and those associated with the signing. Includes biographies of the signers and patriots Patrick Henry and James Otis.

WHITNEY, DAVID C. Founders of Freedom in America: Lives of the Men Who Signed the Declaration of Independence and Helped Establish the United States of America. Chicago: J. G. Ferguson, 1964. This beautifully illustrated book is one of the best popular accounts of the events during the Revolutionary era and the individuals involved in the signing. It features biographies of the signers and patriots Patrick Henry and James Otis.


270

270

Criteria for Selection of Historic
Sites of National Significance

A. National significance is ascribed to buildings, sites, objects, or districts which possess exceptional value or quality in illustrating or interpreting the historical (history and archeology) heritage of our Nation, such as:

A. National significance is given to buildings, sites, objects, or districts that have outstanding value or quality in showcasing or explaining the historical (history and archaeology) heritage of our Nation, such as:

1. Structures or sites at which events occurred that have made a significant contribution to, and are identified prominently with, or which outstandingly represent, the broad cultural, political, economic, military, or social history of the Nation, and from which an understanding and appreciation of the larger patterns of our American heritage may be gained.

1. Places or sites where important events took place that have greatly contributed to, are closely associated with, or prominently represent the wide cultural, political, economic, military, or social history of the Nation, and from which we can gain insight and appreciation of the larger trends in our American heritage.

2. Structures or sites associated importantly with the lives of persons nationally significant in the history of the United States.

2. Structures or places that are significantly connected to the lives of individuals who are nationally important in the history of the United States.

3. Structures or sites associated significantly with an important event that outstandingly represents some great idea or ideal of the American people.

3. Structures or locations that are closely linked to a significant event that exceptionally embodies a great idea or ideal of the American people.

4. Structures that embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, exceptionally valuable for a study of a period, style, or method of construction; or a notable structure representing the work of a master builder, designer, or architect.

4. Buildings that showcase the key features of a specific architectural style, highly valuable for examining a particular period, style, or construction method; or a significant structure that highlights the work of a skilled builder, designer, or architect.

5. Objects that figured prominently in nationally significant events; or that were prominently associated with nationally significant persons; or that outstandingly represent some great idea or ideal of the American people; or that embody distinguishing characteristics of a type specimen,271 exceptionally valuable for a study of a period, style, or method of construction; or that are notable as representations of the work of master workers or designers.

5. Items that played a key role in significant national events; or that were closely linked to notable national figures; or that exceptionally represent a great idea or ideal of the American people; or that display unique characteristics of a type specimen,271 extremely valuable for studying a particular period, style, or construction method; or that are remarkable as examples of the work of master artisans or designers.

6. Archeological sites that have produced information of a major scientific importance by revealing new cultures, or by shedding light upon periods of occupation over large areas of the United States. Such sites are those which have produced, or which may reasonably be expected to produce, data affecting theories, concepts, and ideas to a major degree.

6. Archaeological sites that have provided information of significant scientific importance by uncovering new cultures or by clarifying periods of occupation across large areas of the United States. These are sites that have yielded, or are likely to yield, data that significantly influences theories, concepts, and ideas.

7. When preserved or restored as integral parts of the environment, historic buildings not sufficiently significant individually by reason of historical association or architectural merit to warrant recognition may collectively compose a “historic district” that is of historical significance to the Nation in commemorating or illustrating a way of life in its developing culture.

7. When preserved or restored as key parts of the environment, historic buildings that may not be individually important due to their historical associations or architectural value can together form a “historic district” that holds historical significance for the Nation by commemorating or illustrating a way of life in its evolving culture.

B. To possess national significance, a historic or prehistoric structure, district, site, or object must possess integrity. For a historic or prehistoric site, integrity requires original location and intangible elements of feeling and association. The site of a structure no longer standing may possess national significance if the person or event associated with the structure was of transcendent importance in the Nation’s history and the association consequential.

B. For a historic or prehistoric structure, district, site, or object to be nationally significant, it must have integrity. For a historic or prehistoric site, integrity means having the original location and intangible elements of feeling and connection. A site where a structure no longer exists can still hold national significance if the person or event linked to that structure was extremely important in the Nation’s history and the connection was significant.

For a historic or prehistoric structure, integrity is a composite quality derived from original workmanship, original location, and intangible elements of feeling and association. A structure no longer on the original site may possess national significance if the person or event associated with it was of transcendent importance in the Nation’s history and the association consequential.

For a historic or prehistoric structure, integrity is a blend of qualities that come from its original craftsmanship, its original location, and the intangible feelings and connections it evokes. A structure that's no longer in its original spot can still hold national significance if the person or event linked to it was extremely important in the country's history and the connection is meaningful.

For a historic district, integrity is a composite quality derived from original workmanship, original location, and intangible elements of feeling and association inherent in an ensemble of historic buildings having visual architectural unity.

For a historic district, integrity is a combined quality that comes from original craftsmanship, original location, and the intangible feelings and connections that arise from a group of historic buildings that share visual architectural unity.

For a historic object, integrity requires basic original workmanship.

For a historic object, having integrity means it must have basic original craftsmanship.

C. Structures or sites which are primarily of significance in the field of religion or to religious bodies but are not of national importance in other fields of the history of the United States, such as political, military, or architectural history, will not be eligible for consideration.

C. Structures or sites that are mainly important in the area of religion or to religious organizations but are not significant on a national level in other areas of U.S. history, like political, military, or architectural history, will not be eligible for consideration.

D. Birthplaces, graves, burials, and cemeteries, as a general rule, are not eligible for consideration and recognition except in cases of historical figures of transcendent importance. Historic sites associated with the actual careers and contributions of outstanding historical personages usually are more important than their birthplaces and burial places.

D. Generally, birthplaces, graves, burials, and cemeteries aren't considered for recognition unless they are tied to historically significant figures. Historic sites related to the actual careers and contributions of notable historical figures are typically more important than where they were born or buried.

E. Structures, sites, and objects achieving historical importance within the past 50 years will not as a general rule be considered unless associated with persons or events of transcendent significance.

E. Structures, sites, and objects that have gained historical significance in the past 50 years will generally not be considered unless they are connected to individuals or events of outstanding importance.


272

272

Acknowledgments

Advisory Board on National Parks, Historic Sites,
Buildings, and Monuments (1971)

Advisory Board on National Parks, Historic Sites,
Buildings, and Monuments (1971)

Durward L. Allen, Purdue University.
Hon. E. Y. Berry, Rapid City, S. Dak.
Anthony A. Buford, Clayton, Mo.
Loren C. Eiseley, University of Pennsylvania.
Mrs. Lyndon B. Johnson, Stonewall, Tex.
Peter C. Murphy, Jr., Springfield, Oreg.
Nathaniel A. Owings, San Francisco, Calif.
Melvin M. Payne, National Geographic Society.
Linden C. Pettys, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Steven Rose, Arcadia, Calif.
William G. Shade, Lehigh University.
Elisha Walker, Jr., New York, N.Y.
James W. Whittaker, Seattle, Wash.

Durward L. Allen, Purdue University.
Hon. E. Y. Berry, Rapid City, S.D.
Anthony A. Buford, Clayton, MO
Loren C. Eiseley, University of Pennsylvania.
Mrs. Lyndon B. Johnson, Stonewall, TX
Peter C. Murphy, Jr., Springfield, OR
Nathaniel A. Owings, San Francisco, CA
Melvin M. Payne, National Geographic Society.
Linden C. Pettys, Ann Arbor, MI
Steven Rose, Arcadia, CA
William G. Shade, Lehigh University.
Elisha Walker, Jr., New York, NY
James W. Whittaker, Seattle, WA

National Park Service

National Park Service

Edwin C. Bearss, Historian, Historic Preservation Project (East), Denver Service Center.

Edwin C. Bearss, Historian, Historic Preservation Project (East), Denver Service Center.

S. Sydney Bradford, Chief, Plans and Grants, National Register of Historic Places.

S. Sydney Bradford, Chief, Plans and Grants, National Register of Historic Places.

273 George S. Cattanach, Jr., Program Coordinator, National Register of Historic Places.

273 George S. Cattanach, Jr., Program Coordinator, National Register of Historic Places.

Henry A. Judd, Chief, Park Historic Architecture, Division of Historic Architecture.

Henry A. Judd, Chief, Park Historic Architecture, Division of Historic Architecture.

Herbert E. Kahler, Chief (retired), Division of History and Archeology.

Herbert E. Kahler, Chief (retired), Division of History and Archaeology.

Ronald F. Lee, Special Assistant to the Director.

Ronald F. Lee, Special Assistant to the Director.

John Luzader, Historian, Historic Preservation Project (East), Denver Service Center.

John Luzader, Historian, Historic Preservation Project (East), Denver Service Center.

Warren A. McCullough, Management Assistant, Independence National Historical Park, Pa.

Warren A. McCullough, Management Assistant, Independence National Historical Park, PA.

John D. McDermott, Assistant Executive Secretary, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

John D. McDermott, Assistant Executive Secretary, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

Thomas W. Mullen, Student Research Assistant (Northeastern University), Division of History.

Thomas W. Mullen, Student Research Assistant (Northeastern University), Division of History.

Denys Peter Myers, Architectural Historian, Division of History.

Denys Peter Myers, Architectural Historian, History Division.

John D. R. Platt, Historian, Independence National Historical Park, Pa.

John D. R. Platt, Historian, Independence National Historical Park, PA.

Charles W. Porter III, Chief Historian (retired), Division of History.

Charles W. Porter III, Chief Historian (retired), Division of History.

Charles W. Snell, Historian, Division of History.

Charles W. Snell, Historian, History Division.

Martin I. Yoelson, Supervisory Interpretive Specialist, Independence National Historical Park, Pa.

Martin I. Yoelson, Supervisory Interpretive Specialist, Independence National Historical Park, PA.

Other Individuals

Other People

Roland A. Block, Regional Director, Taconic State Park Commission, Staatsburg, N.Y.

Roland A. Block, Regional Director, Taconic State Park Commission, Staatsburg, NY.

Jerry M. Bloomer, Secretary-Registrar, R. W. Norton Art Gallery, Shreveport.

Jerry M. Bloomer, Secretary-Registrar, R. W. Norton Art Gallery, Shreveport.

Edwin Cox, President, Virginia Historical Society, Richmond.

Edwin Cox, President, Virginia Historical Society, Richmond.

Alonzo T. Dill, West Point, Va.

Alonzo T. Dill, West Point, VA.

Educational Programs Staff, National Archives and Records Service, U.S. General Services Administration.

Educational Programs Staff, National Archives and Records Service, U.S. General Services Administration.

Ms. Constance M. Greiff, Vice President, Historical Society of Princeton, N.J.

Ms. Constance M. Greiff, Vice President, Historical Society of Princeton, NJ.

Ms. Virginia Gunter, Curator, New Hampshire Historical Society, Concord.

Ms. Virginia Gunter, Curator, New Hampshire Historical Society, Concord.

Edgar R. Lafferty, Jr., Elsing Green, King William, Va.

Edgar R. Lafferty, Jr., Elsing Green, King William, VA.

Charles H. McCormick, Assistant Professor of History, Fairmont State College, Fairmont, W. Va.

Charles H. McCormick, Assistant Professor of History, Fairmont State College, Fairmont, WV.

Ms. Mildred Steinbach, Librarian, Frick Art Reference Library, New York.

Ms. Mildred Steinbach, Librarian, Frick Art Reference Library, New York.

E. Berkeley Tompkins, Director, Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs, Department of State, State of Delaware, Dover.

E. Berkeley Tompkins, Director, Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs, Department of State, State of Delaware, Dover.


274

274

Art and Picture Credits

The National Park Service gratefully acknowledges the assistance of agencies and individuals furnishing illustrations and granting permission to reproduce them.

The National Park Service sincerely thanks the agencies and individuals who provided illustrations and allowed us to reproduce them.

Page

Page

  ii  Oil (1817) by John Trumbull, after his earlier painting of the same name (1786–95). Color separations courtesy United States Capitol Historical Society and Eastern National Park and Monument Association. Of the 48 individuals in the painting, 44 are signers. The likenesses were the basis for many later portraits by other artists.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Oil (1817) by John Trumbull, based on his earlier painting with the same title (1786–95). Color separations provided by the United States Capitol Historical Society and Eastern National Park and Monument Association. Out of the 48 individuals depicted, 44 are signers. Their likenesses influenced many subsequent portraits created by other artists.

  4  Oil (date unknown) by Allan Ramsay. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ Oil (date unknown) by Allan Ramsay. Library of Congress.

  5  Engraving (1770) by Paul Revere. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ Engraving (1770) by Paul Revere. Library of Congress.

  6  Lithograph (1830) by either William or John Pendleton, after a cartoon (1774) published in London. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__ Lithograph (1830) by either William or John Pendleton, based on a cartoon (1774) published in London. Library of Congress.

  7  Lithograph (1846) by Nathaniel Currier. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__ Lithograph (1846) by Nathaniel Currier. Library of Congress.

  8  Engraving (1775) by Amos Doolittle. National Park Service.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__ Engraving (1775) by Amos Doolittle. National Park Service.

  9  Detail from broadside, publisher unknown. National Park Service.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__ Detail from broadside, publisher unknown. National Park Service.

10  Engraving (ca. 1776) by an unknown artist. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__ Engraving (circa 1776) by an unknown artist. Library of Congress.

11  Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_8__ Library of Congress.

12  Oil (ca. 1858) by Bass Otis, after George Romney. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_9__ Oil (circa 1858) by Bass Otis, after George Romney. Independence National Historical Park.

13  Mezzotint (1778) by an unknown artist, after Corbutt. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_10__ Mezzotint (1778) by an unknown artist, after Corbutt. Library of Congress.

14  Oil (ca. 1782) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_11__ Oil (around 1782) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

17  Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_12__ Library of Congress.

19  Engraving (1823) by William Stone. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_13__ Engraving (1823) by William Stone. Library of Congress.

21  Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_14__ Library of Congress.

22  Engraving (1859) by John C. McRae, after Johannes A. S. Oertel. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_15__ Engraving (1859) by John C. McRae, after Johannes A. S. Oertel. Library of Congress.

23  Oil (date unknown) by Xavier D. Gratta. Valley Forge (Pa.) Historical Society.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_16__ Oil (date unknown) by Xavier D. Gratta. Valley Forge (Pa.) Historical Society.

28  Oil (before 1897) by an unknown artist, after Thomas Sully. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_17__ Oil (before 1897) by an unknown artist, after Thomas Sully. Independence National Historical Park.

29  Oil (date unknown) by W. Trego. Valley Forge (Pa.) Historical Society.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_18__ Oil (date unknown) by W. Trego. Valley Forge (PA) Historical Society.

30  Engraving (ca. 1725–26) by William Burgis. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_19__ Engraving (around 1725–26) by William Burgis. Library of Congress.

27533  Oil (ca. 1791–94) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

275  __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_20__ Oil (circa 1791–94) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

36  Oil (1873) by Nahum B. Onthank, after John S. Copley. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_21__ Oil (1873) by Nahum B. Onthank, after John S. Copley. Independence National Historical Park.

39  Oil (1871) by Caroline Weeks, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_22__ Oil (1871) by Caroline Weeks, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

41  Oil (1901) by Albert Rosenthal, after a miniature by an unknown artist. Independence National Historical Park. In 1913 Charles H. Hart, an authority on historical portraits, maintained that this likeness was not Carter Braxton but was that of his brother George.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_23__ Oil (1901) by Albert Rosenthal, after a miniature by an unknown artist. Independence National Historical Park. In 1913, Charles H. Hart, an expert on historical portraits, asserted that this portrait was not of Carter Braxton but rather his brother George.

43  Oil (1823) by Charles Willson Peale, after Rembrandt Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_24__ Oil (1823) by Charles Willson Peale, after Rembrandt Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

45  Oil (1819) by Charles Willson Peale, after his 1773 painting. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_25__ Oil (1819) by Charles Willson Peale, after his 1773 painting. Independence National Historical Park.

47  Oil (1873) by James R. Lambdin, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_26__ Oil (1873) by James R. Lambdin, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

48  Wood engraving by an unknown artist, after F. O. C. Darley, from Henry Howe, Life and Death on the Ocean (1855). Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_27__ Wood engraving by an unknown artist, after F. O. C. Darley, from Henry Howe, Life and Death on the Ocean (1855). Library of Congress.

49  Oil (1872) by Edward D. Marchant, after Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_28__ Oil (1872) by Edward D. Marchant, based on Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

50  Pen and ink drawing by an unknown artist, from Magazine of American History (September 1880). Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_29__ Pen and ink drawing by an unknown artist, from Magazine of American History (September 1880). Library of Congress.

51  Oil (1876) by Samuel B. Waugh, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_30__ Oil (1876) by Samuel B. Waugh, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

53  Oil (1874) by Edward L. Henry, after Ralph Earl (Earle). Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_31__ Oil (1874) by Edward L. Henry, after Ralph Earl (Earle). Independence National Historical Park.

55  Oil (date unknown) by David Martin. Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, Philadelphia.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_32__ Oil (date unknown) by David Martin. Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, Philadelphia.

57  Engraving (1859) by Robert Whitechurch, after Christian Schussele. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_33__ Engraving (1859) by Robert Whitechurch, after Christian Schussele. Library of Congress.

59  Oil (1861) by James Bogle, after John Vanderlyn. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_34__ Oil (1861) by James Bogle, after John Vanderlyn. Independence National Historical Park.

62  Detail from the lithograph “Signers of the Declaration of Independence,” published in 1876 by Ole Erekson. Library of Congress. The detail is a conjectural representation; no portrait or reliable likeness of Button Gwinnett is known to exist.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_35__ Detail from the lithograph “Signers of the Declaration of Independence,” published in 1876 by Ole Erekson. Library of Congress. This detail is a speculative representation; no portrait or reliable likeness of Button Gwinnett exists.

63  Lithograph, probably by an artist named Ferris, from William Brotherhead, The Book of the Signers (1861). Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_36__ Lithograph, possibly by an artist named Ferris, from William Brotherhead, The Book of the Signers (1861). Library of Congress.

65  Detail from the lithograph “Signers of the Declaration of Independence,” published in 1876 by Ole Erekson. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_37__ Detail from the lithograph “Signers of the Declaration of Independence,” published in 1876 by Ole Erekson. Library of Congress.

67  Oil (1816) by Samuel F. B. Morse, after John S. Copley. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_38__ Oil (1816) by Samuel F. B. Morse, after John S. Copley. Independence National Historical Park.

27670  Oil (1873) by James R. Lambdin, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

276  __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_39__ Oil (1873) by James R. Lambdin, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

71  Oil (ca. 1884) by Herman F. Deigendisch, after Henry Bryan, Jr. Independence National Historical Park. Some authorities have questioned the authenticity of this likeness.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_40__ Oil (ca. 1884) by Herman F. Deigendisch, after Henry Bryan, Jr. Independence National Historical Park. Some experts have questioned the authenticity of this likeness.

73  Oil (before 1893) by an unknown artist, after Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_41__ Oil (before 1893) by an unknown artist, after Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

74  Engraving by James B. Longacre, after Charles Willson Peale, from James Herring and James B. Longacre, The National Portrait Gallery of Distinguished Americans (1836). Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_42__ Engraving by James B. Longacre, after Charles Willson Peale, from James Herring and James B. Longacre, The National Portrait Gallery of Distinguished Americans (1836). Library of Congress.

75  Oil (before 1851) by Charles Fraser, after Jeremiah Theus. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_43__ Oil (before 1851) by Charles Fraser, after Jeremiah Theus. Independence National Historical Park.

77  Oil (1873) by James R. Lambdin, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_44__ Oil (1873) by James R. Lambdin, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

79  Oil (1873) by James R. Lambdin, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park. According to one authority, Trumbull based his likeness on the features of Hopkins’ eldest son, Rufus, who bore a close resemblance to his father.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_45__ Oil (1873) by James R. Lambdin, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park. According to one expert, Trumbull based his representation on the features of Hopkins' oldest son, Rufus, who strongly resembled his father.

81  Oil (before 1854) by Dubois (probably Samuel T.), after Robert E. Pine. Historical Society of Pennsylvania and Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_46__ Oil (before 1854) by Dubois (probably Samuel T.), after Robert E. Pine. Historical Society of Pennsylvania and Independence National Historical Park.

83  Oil (1783) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_47__ Oil (1783) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

85  Oil (1791) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_48__ Oil (1791) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

87  Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_49__ Library of Congress.

89  Engraving (1826) by Benjamin Tanner. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_50__ Engraving (1826) by Benjamin Tanner. Library of Congress.

90  Detail from the lithograph “Signers of the Declaration of Independence,” published in 1876 by Ole Erekson. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_51__ Detail from the lithograph “Signers of the Declaration of Independence,” published in 1876 by Ole Erekson. Library of Congress.

92  Oil (1784) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_52__ Oil (1784) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

94  Oil (1906) by Albert Rosenthal, after an engraving from John Sanderson, Biography of the Signers to the Declaration of Independence (1824). Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_53__ Oil (1906) by Albert Rosenthal, based on an engraving by John Sanderson, Biography of the Signers to the Declaration of Independence (1824). Independence National Historical Park.

96  Oil (ca. 1770) probably by Abraham Delanoy, Jr. Frick Art Reference Library, New York City, and Taconic State Park Commission, Staatsburg, N.Y.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_54__ Oil (circa 1770) likely by Abraham Delanoy, Jr. Frick Art Reference Library, New York City, and Taconic State Park Commission, Staatsburg, N.Y.

97  Pen and ink drawing by an unknown artist, from Magazine of American History (December 1885). Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_55__ Pen and ink drawing by an unknown artist, from Magazine of American History (December 1885). Library of Congress.

99  Oil (1875) by Anna Lea, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_56__ Oil (1875) by Anna Lea, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

277 100  Oil (1797) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

277 __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_57__ Oil (1797) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

103  Oil (1872) by Philip F. Wharton, after Benjamin West. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_58__ Oil (1872) by Philip F. Wharton, after Benjamin West. Independence National Historical Park.

104  Oil (1873) by Charles N. Flagg, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_59__ Oil (1873) by Charles N. Flagg, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

106  Oil (ca. 1872) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_60__ Oil (circa 1872) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

107  Engraving by William Birch, from The City of Philadelphia (1800). Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_61__ Engraving by William Birch, from The City of Philadelphia (1800). Independence National Historical Park.

109  Watercolor (ca. 1765) by Pierre Eugene Du Simitière. The R. W. Norton Art Gallery, Shreveport, La.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_62__ Watercolor (circa 1765) by Pierre Eugene Du Simitière. The R. W. Norton Art Gallery, Shreveport, LA.

110  Oil (ca. 1876) by William L. Sheppard, after Mason Chamberlin. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_63__ Oil (c. 1876) by William L. Sheppard, after Mason Chamberlin. Independence National Historical Park.

112  Oil (date unknown) by Louis E. Lami. Hangs in the Virginia State Capitol. National Park Service.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_64__ Oil painting (date unknown) by Louis E. Lami. Hangs in the Virginia State Capitol. National Park Service.

113  Oil (date unknown) by Francis B. Mayer, after Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_65__ Oil (date unknown) by Francis B. Mayer, after Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

115  Oil (1876) by Richard M. Staigg, after Edward Savage. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_66__ Oil (1876) by Richard M. Staigg, after Edward Savage. Independence National Historical Park.

116  Detail from the lithograph “Signers of the Declaration of Independence,” published in 1876 by Ole Erekson. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_67__ Detail from the lithograph “Signers of the Declaration of Independence,” published in 1876 by Ole Erekson. Library of Congress.

118  Oil (1860) by Thomas Sully, after Robert E. Pine. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_68__ Oil (1860) by Thomas Sully, after Robert E. Pine. Independence National Historical Park.

120  Detail from the lithograph “Signers of the Declaration of Independence,” published in 1876 by Ole Erekson. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_69__ Detail from the lithograph “Signers of the Declaration of Independence,” published in 1876 by Ole Erekson. Library of Congress.

122  Oil (1873) by Philip F. Wharton, after Benjamin West. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_70__ Oil (1873) by Philip F. Wharton, after Benjamin West. Independence National Historical Park.

123  Oil (1783) by Charles Willson Peale. The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, Del. Gift of Mrs. Julia B. Henry.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_71__ Oil (1783) by Charles Willson Peale. The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, Del. Gift of Mrs. Julia B. Henry.

125  Engraving (1799) by William Birch & Son. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_72__ Engraving (1799) by William Birch & Son. Library of Congress.

127  Oil (1873) by Philip F. Wharton, after James Earl (Earle). Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_73__ Oil (1873) by Philip F. Wharton, after James Earl (Earle). Independence National Historical Park.

129  Oil (1874–75) by Thomas Hicks, after Ralph Earl (Earle). Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_74__ Oil (1874–75) by Thomas Hicks, after Ralph Earl (Earle). Independence National Historical Park.

130  Lithograph by an unknown artist, from William Brotherhead, The Book of the Signers (1861). Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_75__ Lithograph by an unknown artist, from William Brotherhead, The Book of the Signers (1861). Library of Congress.

132  Watercolor (ca. 1760) by an unknown artist. The R. W. Norton Art Gallery, Shreveport, La.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_76__ Watercolor (around 1760) by an unknown artist. The R. W. Norton Art Gallery, Shreveport, LA.

133  Oil (1873) by George W. Conarroe, after John Wollaston. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_77__ Oil (1873) by George W. Conarroe, after John Wollaston. Independence National Historical Park.

278 135  Library of Congress.

278 __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_78__ Library of Congress.

137  Oil (1912) by Laura J. Schneider, probably after George T. Pool. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_79__ Oil (1912) by Laura J. Schneider, likely inspired by George T. Pool. Independence National Historical Park.

139  Oil (date unknown) by an unknown artist. New Hampshire Historical Society, Concord.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_80__ Oil painting (date unknown) by an unknown artist. New Hampshire Historical Society, Concord.

140  Oil (1874) by Samuel B. Waugh, after Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_81__ Oil (1874) by Samuel B. Waugh, based on Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

142  Oil (1888) by Ulysses D. Tenney, after John Trumbull. Hangs in the Moffatt-Ladd House, Portsmouth, N.H. Photographer, Douglas Armsden, Kittery Point, Maine.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_82__ Oil (1888) by Ulysses D. Tenney, after John Trumbull. It’s displayed in the Moffatt-Ladd House in Portsmouth, N.H. Photographer: Douglas Armsden, Kittery Point, Maine.

144  Oil (1873) by James J. Sawyer, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_83__ Oil (1873) by James J. Sawyer, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

145  Oil (1873) by Philip F. Wharton, after a miniature attributed to James Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_84__ Oil (1873) by Philip F. Wharton, based on a miniature credited to James Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

146  Sketch (date unknown) by C. A. Poulson. Historical Society of Pennsylvania and Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_85__ Sketch (date unknown) by C. A. Poulson. Historical Society of Pennsylvania and Independence National Historical Park.

149  Oil (ca. 1783) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_86__ Oil (circa 1783) by Charles Willson Peale. Independence National Historical Park.

150  Engraving by Henry Dawkins, after W. Tennant, from An Account of the College of New Jersey (1764). Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_87__ Engraving by Henry Dawkins, after W. Tennant, from An Account of the College of New Jersey (1764). Library of Congress.

152  Oil (1873) by James R. Lambdin, after Ralph Earl (Earle). Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_88__ Oil (1873) by James R. Lambdin, after Ralph Earl (Earle). Independence National Historical Park.

154  Oil (1876) by John F. Weir, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_89__ Oil (1876) by John F. Weir, after John Trumbull. Independence National Historical Park.

164  National Park Service (Tony P. Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_90__ National Park Service (Tony P. Wrenn).

165  National Park Service (Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_91__ National Park Service (Wrenn).

167  National Park Service (Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_92__ National Park Service (Wrenn).

168  National Park Service (Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_93__ National Park Service (Wrenn).

169  National Park Service (Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_94__ National Park Service (Wrenn).

171  National Park Service (Abbie Rowe).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_95__ National Park Service (Abbie Rowe).

172  Aquatint by an unknown artist, from Charles W. Janson, The Stranger in America (1807). Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_96__ Aquatint by an unknown artist, from Charles W. Janson, The Stranger in America (1807). Library of Congress.

174  National Park Service (Charles W. Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_97__ National Park Service (Charles W. Snell).

175  National Park Service (John O. Littleton).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_98__ National Park Service (John O. Littleton).

178  National Park Service (Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_99__ National Park Service (Wrenn).

179  National Park Service (Littleton).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_100__ National Park Service (Littleton).

181  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_101__ National Park Service (Snell).

182  National Park Service (Littleton).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_102__ National Park Service (Littleton).

184  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_103__ National Park Service (Snell).

279 185  National Park Service (Snell).

279 __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_104__ National Park Service (Snell).

187  Photographer, William L. Klender.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_105__ Photographer, William L. Klender.

188  National Park Service (Littleton).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_106__ National Park Service (Littleton).

190  National Park Service (Littleton).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_107__ National Park Service (Littleton).

192  Engraving (date unknown) probably by Stephen A. Schouff. Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_108__ Engraving (date unknown) likely by Stephen A. Schouff. Library of Congress.

194  National Park Service (Joseph L. Winn, Jr.).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_109__ National Park Service (Joseph L. Winn, Jr.).

196  National Park Service (Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_110__ National Park Service (Wrenn).

197  National Park Service (Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_111__ National Park Service (Wrenn).

198  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_112__ National Park Service (Snell).

200  National Park Service (Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_113__ National Park Service (Wrenn).

201  National Park Service (Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_114__ National Park Service (Wrenn).

203  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_115__ National Park Service (Snell).

205  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_116__ National Park Service (Snell).

206  Historical Society of Princeton, N.J. Photographer, Constance Greiff.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_117__ Historical Society of Princeton, NJ. Photographer: Constance Greiff.

207  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_118__ National Park Service (Snell).

208  Department of Public Information, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_119__ Department of Public Information, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.

210  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_120__ National Park Service (Snell).

211  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_121__ National Park Service (Snell).

212  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_122__ National Park Service (Snell).

213  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_123__ National Park Service (Snell).

215  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_124__ National Park Service (Snell).

216  National Park Service (Ralph H. Anderson).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_125__ National Park Service (Ralph H. Anderson).

219  Engraving by an unknown artist, from Columbian Magazine (July 1787). Library of Congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_126__ Engraving by an unknown artist, from Columbian Magazine (July 1787). Library of Congress.

220  National Park Service.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_127__ National Park Service.

223  National Park Service.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_128__ National Park Service.

224  National Park Service (Jack E. Boucher).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_129__ National Park Service (Jack E. Boucher).

225  National Park Service.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_130__ National Park Service.

227  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_131__ National Park Service (Snell).

229  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_132__ National Park Service (Snell).

230  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_133__ National Park Service (Snell).

232  National Park Service (Wrenn).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_134__ National Park Service (Wrenn).

233  National Park Service.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_135__ National Park Service.

235  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_136__ National Park Service (Snell).

236  Photographer, Jesse Gibbes.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_137__ Photographer, Jesse Gibbes.

280 238  National Park Service (Snell).

280 __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_138__ National Park Service (Snell).

239  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_139__ National Park Service (Snell).

241  National Park Service (Littleton).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_140__ National Park Service (Littleton).

242  National Park Service (Littleton).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_141__ National Park Service (Littleton).

244  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_142__ National Park Service (Snell).

246  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_143__ National Park Service (Snell).

248  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_144__ National Park Service (Snell).

250  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_145__ National Park Service (Snell).

251  National Park Service (Littleton).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_146__ National Park Service (Littleton).

253  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_147__ National Park Service (Snell).

256  National Park Service (Snell).

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_148__ National Park Service (Snell).

265  National Archives.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_149__ National Archives.

266  National Archives.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_150__ National Archives.

 —  FRONT END PAPER: Engraving (1776) by John C. McRae. Independence National Historical Park.

— __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_151__: Engraving (1776) by John C. McRae. Independence National Historical Park.

 —  REAR END PAPER: National Park Service sketch.

— __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_152__: National Park Service sketch.


281

281

Index

☆ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1974 O-477-940

☆ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1974 O-477-940

Sketch of proposed reconstruction of the Graff House, where Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence.

Transcriber’s Notes

Punctuation and spelling were made consistent when a predominant preference was found in this book; otherwise they were not changed.

Punctuation and spelling were standardized when a clear preference was identified in this book; otherwise, they were left unchanged.

Simple typographical errors were corrected; occasional unbalanced quotation marks retained.

Simple typographical errors were fixed; occasional unbalanced quotation marks kept.

Ambiguous hyphens at the ends of lines were retained; occurrences of inconsistent hyphenation have not been changed.

Ambiguous hyphens at the ends of lines were kept; instances of inconsistent hyphenation have not been altered.

Text on the obverse of many illustrations appeared in the scans of those pages and could not be removed, resulting in mottled dark bands across those images. Also, most of the images were slightly distorted (non-rectangular): small, non-essential edges of those images have been omitted here.

Text on the front of many illustrations showed up in the scans of those pages and couldn't be removed, causing mottled dark bands across those images. Additionally, most of the images were slightly distorted (non-rectangular): small, non-essential edges of those images have been left out here.

For compatibility with various display devices, the symbols for Site Categories beginning on page 163 are slightly different from the ones used in the original book.

For compatibility with different display devices, the symbols for Site Categories starting on page 163 are a bit different from the ones used in the original book.

Index not checked for proper alphabetization or correct page references.

Index not verified for accurate alphabetization or correct page references.


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!