This is a modern-English version of The Noble and Gentle Men of England: or, notes touching the arms and descents of the ancient knightly and gentle houses of England, arranged in their respective counties., originally written by Shirley, Evelyn Philip. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.


[Illustration: cover art]




THE
NOBLE AND GENTLE
MEN OF ENGLAND.




THE

Noble and kind

MEN OF ENGLAND;

OR, NOTES ABOUT

THE ARMS AND DESCENTS

OF THE

ANCIENT KNIGHTLY AND GENTLE HOUSES OF ENGLAND,

ARRANGED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNTIES.

ATTEMPTED BY

Evelyn Philip Shirley, Esq. M.A. F.S.A.

LATE ONE OF THE KNIGHTS OF THE SHIRE FOR WARWICKSHIRE COUNTY.


WESTMINSTER:
JOHN BOWER NICHOLS AND SONS.
Third Edition, Corrected 1866.




PREFACE.



"That noble families are continued in a long succession of wealth, honour, and reputation, is justly esteemed as one of the most valuable of worldly blessings, as being the certain tokens of God Almighty's providential favour, and the prudent conduct of such ancestors,"—Nath. Johnston's Account of the Family of Bruce Earl of Aylesbury, 1691, Harl. MS, 3879.

"That noble families continue through generations of wealth, honor, and reputation is rightly considered one of the greatest earthly blessings, as it reflects God's divine favor and the wise actions of their forebears,"—Nath. Johnston's Account of the Family of Bruce Earl of Aylesbury, 1691, Harl. MS, 3879.

THE following imperfect attempt to bring together a few notes relating to the ancient aristocracy of England, is confined in the first place to the families now existing, and regularly established either as knightly or gentle houses before the commencement of the sixteenth century; secondly, no notice is taken of those families who may have assumed the name and arms of their ancestors in the female line: for the truth is, as it has been well observed,* "that, unless we take the male line as the general standard of genealogical rank, we shall find ourselves in a hopeless state of confusion;" thirdly, illegitimate descent is of course excluded; and, fourthly, where families have sold their original estates, they will be noticed in those counties where they are at present seated; if however they still possess the ancient estate of their family, though they may reside in another county, they will be mentioned for the most part under that county from whence they originally sprung.

THE following imperfect attempt to compile a few notes about the ancient aristocracy of England focuses mainly on families currently existing and regularly established as knightly or gentle houses before the start of the sixteenth century; secondly, it does not include families that may have taken on the name and arms of their ancestors through the female line: because, as has been aptly stated,* "unless we use the male line as the general standard for genealogical rank, we will find ourselves in a hopeless state of confusion;" thirdly, illegitimate descent is excluded; and fourthly, if families have sold their original estates, they will be noted in the counties where they currently reside; however, if they still own their family's ancient estate, even if they live in a different county, they will mostly be mentioned under the county from which they originally came.

In those cases where the whole landed estate of the family has been dissipated, although the male line still remains, all notice is omitted, such families having no longer any claim to be classed in any county. For, "ancient dignity was territorial rather than personal, the whole system was rooted in the land, and, even in the present day, though the land may have changed hands often, it has carried along with it some of that sentiment of regard attached to the lordship of it, as surely as its earth has the fresh smell which it gives when upturned by the husbandman."**

In cases where the family has completely lost its land, even though the male line still exists, they are no longer recognized, as such families no longer have any claim to be identified in any county. "Ancient dignity was more about the land than the individuals; the entire system was based on the land. Even today, although the land might have changed hands frequently, it still carries some of the respect associated with its ownership, just like the soil gives off a fresh smell when turned over by the farmer."

This list also, it must be remembered, does not profess to give an account of all those families whose descent may possibly be traced beyond the year 1500, but merely of those who were in the position of what we now call county families before that period. The line of demarcation indeed between the families who rose upon the ruins of the monastic system, and the more ancient aristocracy of England, is often very difficult to be traced, depending as it does on documentary evidence often inaccessible, and obscured by the fanciful and too favourable deductions of the heralds of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.

This list also, it should be noted, doesn’t claim to cover all the families whose ancestry can possibly be traced back before 1500. It only includes those who were what we now call county families before that time. In fact, the division between the families that emerged from the downfall of the monastic system and the older aristocracy of England is often hard to define. This is largely because it relies on documentary evidence that is often hard to access and is complicated by the fanciful and overly generous interpretations of the heralds from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.

With regard to the sources from whence the following memoranda have been taken, I have endeavoured as much as possible to rely upon the best county histories and MS. collections of authority, and carefully to eschew those modern accounts of family history, which, by ascribing the most absurd pretensions of ancient lineage to families who bore no real claim to that distinction, have done much to bring genealogy itself into contempt among that numerous class of readers who are but slightly acquainted with the subject.

Regarding the sources from which the following notes were taken, I have tried as much as possible to rely on the best county histories and authoritative manuscript collections, and to carefully avoid those modern accounts of family history that, by attributing ridiculous claims of ancient lineage to families without any real justification, have done a lot to undermine genealogy itself among the many readers who are only a little familiar with the topic.

I cannot conclude without recording my obligations to several gentlemen who have in the most liberal manner placed their genealogical collections at my service, and by so doing rendered less imperfect these notices of the noble and gentle houses of England: among that number I wish particularly to mention the names of the late Mr. Joseph Morris of Shrewsbury and Mr. Joseph Hunter, one of the Assistant Keepers of the Records, the learned and accurate historian of South Yorkshire.
E.P.S.

I can’t wrap up without acknowledging the kindness of several gentlemen who have generously made their genealogical collections available to me. Their contributions have improved these accounts of the noble and gentle families of England. I especially want to highlight the late Mr. Joseph Morris of Shrewsbury and Mr. Joseph Hunter, one of the Assistant Keepers of the Records, who is a knowledgeable and precise historian of South Yorkshire.
E.P.S.

Lower Eatington, July 1, 1860.

Lower Eatington, July 1, 1860.


* Quarterly Review, Jan. 1858, p. 37.
** Quarterly Review, Jan. 1858, p. 31.




PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION.


ANOTHER edition of this little work having been called for, I have carefully revised and corrected what has been already written; I have also made some additions, the result of further investigation, and the information of many friends and correspondents, whose courtesy and kindness I here beg most gratefully to acknowledge.

ANOTHER edition of this little work has been requested, so I have carefully revised and corrected what has already been written; I have also added some new information based on further research and the insights of many friends and correspondents, whose generosity and kindness I would like to acknowledge with deep gratitude.

Since the book was published in the year 1859, the male lines of three families, whose names were originally comprehended in it, have become extinct, viz.: Cotton of Landwade, in the county of Cambridge, Hornyold of Blackmore Park, and Hanford of Wollashill, both in Worcestershire. On the other hand, notices of eight "new peers?" will be found in the present volume, four of which also occurred in the second edition. I allude to Lovett of Liscombe, in the county of Buckingham, and Basset of Tehidy, in the county of Cornwall—very ancient families, whose landed property being until lately in female hands, could not, in accordance with the rules which I had laid down, be comprehended in the first edition; I have also added Huyshe of Sand, in Devonshire, Patten of Bank Hall, in Lincolnshire, Bertie of Uffington, Anderson of Brocklesby, and Massingberd of Wrangle, all in Lincolnshire, and, lastly, Upton of Ashton Court, in the county of Somerset. And here I must again beg to remind the reader, that the intention of this work is not to give an account of every family whose pedigree may be continued in the male line beyond the time which I have mentioned (the beginning of the sixteenth century), but of those only who were established as county families, "inheriting arms from their ancestors," at that period. It is no doubt in many cases very difficult to distinguish accurately the pretensions of many families who may possibly have a fair claim to this distinction, though, from the reasons to which I have formerly alluded, it is not easy to establish them. I can only say that as far as my information extends I have endeavoured fairly and honestly to draw the correct line, but whether I have succeeded must be left to the judgment of others.
E. P. S.

Since the book was published in 1859, the male lines of three families originally included in it have died out: Cotton of Landwade in Cambridge, Hornyold of Blackmore Park, and Hanford of Wollashill, both in Worcestershire. On the other hand, you will find mentions of eight "new peers?" in this volume, four of which were also included in the second edition. I refer to Lovett of Liscombe in Buckinghamshire and Basset of Tehidy in Cornwall—very old families whose land was held by women until recently, preventing their inclusion in the first edition according to the rules I established. I've also added Huyshe of Sand in Devon, Patten of Bank Hall in Lincolnshire, Bertie of Uffington, Anderson of Brocklesby, and Massingberd of Wrangle, all in Lincolnshire, plus Upton of Ashton Court in Somerset. I must remind the reader that the purpose of this work is not to document every family whose lineage can be traced through the male line beyond the early sixteenth century, but only those recognized as county families, "inheriting arms from their ancestors," at that time. It is undoubtedly difficult to accurately determine the claims of many families that might well deserve this acknowledgment; however, because of reasons I've mentioned before, it is not easy to establish them. I can only say that as far as my information goes, I have tried my best to draw the right line, but whether I have succeeded is up to others to judge.
E.P.S.

Lower Eatington, January 22, 1866.

Lower Eatington, January 22, 1866.





"An ancient estate should always go to males. It is mighty foolish to let a stranger have it because he marries your daughter and takes your name. As for an Estate newly acquired by trade, you may give it, if you will, to the dog Towser, and let him keep his own name."—DR. JOHNSON.

"An old estate should always be passed down to males. It’s really foolish to let a stranger have it just because he marries your daughter and takes your name. As for an estate gained through trade, you can give it to the dog Towser, and let him keep his own name." —DR. JOHNSON.





Noble and Gentle Men of England


BEDFORDSHIRE.

Knightly.

St.John of Melchbourne, Lord St.John of Bletshoe 1558-9.

arms_page001.jpg

THIS great and ancient Family, though not connected with this county before the reign of Henry VIII., yet, having been for a considerable time seated at Melchbourne, may with propriety be included among the Bedfordshire families, and indeed stands alone as the only one of knightly rank.* Descended in the direct male line from Hugh de Port mentioned in Domesday, in the twelfth century William son of Adam de Port took the name of St.John from the heiress of that great Norman family. Basing in Hampshire, Stanton St.John in Oxfordshire, Bletshoe in the county of Northampton, and Lydiard Tregoze in Wiltshire, both derived from the heiress of Beauchamp in the reign of Henry VI.—have successively been seats of the St.Johns, who have made themselves sufficiently remarkable both for their loyalty and disloyalty in the reign of Charles I., not to mention the ambition and ill-directed abilities of the great Lord Bolingbroke in that of Anne.

THIS great and ancient family, although not tied to this county before the reign of Henry VIII, has been based at Melchbourne for a considerable time, so it can rightly be included among the Bedfordshire families and stands out as the only one of knightly rank.* Descended directly in the male line from Hugh de Port mentioned in Domesday, in the twelfth century, William, son of Adam de Port, adopted the name St. John from the heiress of that prominent Norman family. Basing in Hampshire, Stanton St. John in Oxfordshire, Bletshoe in Northamptonshire, and Lydiard Tregoze in Wiltshire, all derived from the heiress of Beauchamp during the reign of Henry VI, have been the homes of the St. Johns, who became notable for their loyalty and disloyalty during the reign of Charles I, not to mention the ambition and misdirected talents of the great Lord Bolingbroke in the time of Anne.

Younger Branch. St.John of Lydiard Tregoze, Viscount Bolingbroke 1712. Baronet 1611. Descended from Oliver, second son of Sir Oliver St.John and the heiress of Beauchamp.

Younger Branch. St. John of Lydiard Tregoze, Viscount Bolingbroke 1712. Baronet 1611. Descended from Oliver, the second son of Sir Oliver St. John and the heiress of Beauchamp.

See Leland's Itinerary, edition 1769, vol. vi. folio 27, p. 26. Brydges's Collins, vi. 42 and 741. For an account of Bletshoe, and the monuments there, see Gent. Mag. 1799, p. 745. For Lydiard Tregoze, and other monuments of the St.Johns, whose pedigree, by Sir R. St.George, is painted on folding-doors on the north side of the chancel, see the Topographer, i. 508.

See Leland's Itinerary, edition 1769, vol. vi. folio 27, p. 26. Brydges's Collins, vi. 42 and 741. For information about Bletshoe and the monuments there, check Gent. Mag. 1799, p. 745. For Lydiard Tregoze and other monuments of the St. Johns, whose family tree, created by Sir R. St. George, is illustrated on folding doors on the north side of the chancel, refer to the Topographer, i. 508.

Arms.—Argent, on a chief gules two mullets pierced or. William de St.John in the thirteenth century bore in his arms the addition of a bend gules, which was continued by his descendants till the reign of Elizabeth. (Gent. Mag. 1787, 681.) The present coat was borne by Sir John de St.John in the reign of Edward II.; at the same time other members of the family varied the field and charges thus: Sir Roger bore, Ermine, on a chief gules two mullets or; Sir Eymis, Argent, crusilly sable, on a chief gules two mullets or; Sir John de Layneham, Argent, on a chief gules two mullets or, a border indented sable. John, heir of John de St.John, differenced his arms with a label azure, according to the roll of Carlaverock. The roll of arms of the reign of Richard II. gives the mullets of six points pierced azure. Edward St.John at this period bore, Argent, on a chief dancetté gules two mullets of six points or, pierced vert. Rolls of the dates.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, on a red chief two gold stars with holes. William de St. John added a red diagonal stripe to his coat of arms in the thirteenth century, and his descendants used it until the reign of Elizabeth. (Gent. Mag. 1787, 681.) The current coat was used by Sir John de St. John during the reign of Edward II; meanwhile, other family members modified their arms as follows: Sir Roger had Ermine, on a red chief two gold stars; Sir Eymis had Silver, with black crosses, on a red chief two gold stars; Sir John de Layneham had Silver, on a red chief two gold stars, with a black indented border. John, the heir of John de St. John, marked his arms with a blue label, according to the roll of Carlaverock. The roll of arms from the reign of Richard II shows six-pointed stars pierced blue. At this time, Edward St. John bore Silver, on a jagged red chief two six-pointed gold stars, pierced green. Rolls of the dates.

Present Representative, St.Andrew Beauchamp St.John, 14th Baron St.John.

Present Representative, St. Andrew Beauchamp St. John, 14th Baron St. John.

* "Hungry Time hath made a glutton's meal on this Catalogue of Gentry (the List of Gentry of the reign of Henry VI,) and hath left but a very little morsel for manners remaining." Fuller, Worthies of Bedfordshire.




Gentle.

Polhill of Howbury, in the parish of Renhold.

arms_page003.jpg

This family is of ancient Kentish extraction, and is a branch of the Polhills or Polleys of Preston, in Shoreham, in that county, descended from John Polhill, eldest son of John Polhill and Alice de Buckland, the heiress of Preston, in the reign of Henry VI. The Rev. Richard Polwhele, the Historian of Cornwall, was of opinion that the Polhills of Kent were a branch of the Cornish Polwheles, which emigrated from the western into the eastern counties at a very early period; they were certainly seated at Detling in Hollingbourne, in Kent, at or previous to the reign of Edward III. In the time of Elizabeth, the Polhills were of Frenches, in the parish of Burwash, in Sussex. The immediate ancestor of the present family was Nathaniel Polhill, of Burwash and Howbury, an eminent merchant, who died in 1782.

This family has ancient roots in Kent and is a branch of the Polhills or Polleys of Preston, in Shoreham, Kent. They are descended from John Polhill, the eldest son of John Polhill and Alice de Buckland, the heiress of Preston, during the reign of Henry VI. The Rev. Richard Polwhele, the historian of Cornwall, believed that the Polhills of Kent were a branch of the Cornish Polwheles, who moved from the western to the eastern counties at a very early time. They definitely lived in Detling in Hollingbourne, Kent, during or before the reign of Edward III. By the time of Elizabeth, the Polhills were associated with Frenches, in the parish of Burwash, Sussex. The direct ancestor of the current family was Nathaniel Polhill, from Burwash and Howbury, a prominent merchant who passed away in 1782.

See a very minute account of all the branches of this ancient family in the Topographer and Genealogist, i. pp. 180 and 577. See also Hasted's History of Kent, vol. i, p. 365, and vol. iii. p. 4.

See a detailed report of all the branches of this ancient family in the Topographer and Genealogist, i. pp. 180 and 577. Also check Hasted's History of Kent, vol. i, p. 365, and vol. iii. p. 4.

Arms.—Or, on a bend gules three cross-crosslets of the first. It appears by the Roll of Arms of the reign of Richard II., that Monsr. Rauff Poley bore a coat nearly similar, viz, Argent, on a bend gules three crosses patée or.

Coat of Arms.—Gold, with a red diagonal stripe featuring three small crosses in the same color. According to the Roll of Arms from the reign of Richard II, Monsr. Rauff Poley had a coat that was quite similar, specifically, Silver, with a red diagonal stripe and three gold cross pattée.

Present Representative, Frederick Polhill, Esq.

Present Representative, Frederick Polhill, Esq.





BERKSHIRE.

Gentle.

Eyston of East Hendred.

arms_page004.jpg

It has been observed by old Fuller, "The Lands of Berkshire are very skittish, and are apt to cast their owners;" and again, "Of names which were in days of yore—few remain here of a great store." The ancient family of Eyston, and the succeeding one of Clarke, are indeed the only exceptions at the present day to this rule. The Eystons have been seated at East Hendred since the reign of Henry VI.; John Eiston, their ancestor, having at that period married "Isabel, daughter and heir of John Stow, of Burford, co. Oxford, whose wife was Maud, daughter and heir of Rawlin Arches, of East Henreth, whose great-grandmother was Amy, daughter and heir of Richard Turbervill, of East Henreth, Esq."

It has been noted by the old Fuller, "The lands of Berkshire are quite unpredictable and tend to discard their owners;" and again, "Of names that were prominent in the past—few remain here from a once vast number." The ancient Eyston family and the later Clarke family are indeed the only exceptions to this today. The Eystons have been established in East Hendred since the reign of Henry VI; their ancestor, John Eiston, married "Isabel, daughter and heir of John Stow, of Burford, co. Oxford, whose wife was Maud, daughter and heir of Rawlin Arches, of East Henreth, whose great-grandmother was Amy, daughter and heir of Richard Turbervill, of East Henreth, Esq."

See the Visitation of Berks, 1566. Harl. MS. 1822, 26 b, and Harl. 1532, 19 b. See also Lysons's Berkshire, pp. 186, 292, and Clarke's Hundred of Wanting, 4to. 1824, p. 130.

See the Visitation of Berks, 1566. Harl. MS. 1822, 26 b, and Harl. 1532, 19 b. See also Lysons's Berkshire, pp. 186, 292, and Clarke's Hundred of Wanting, 4to. 1824, p. 130.

Arms.—(Confirmed in 1566.) Sable, three lions rampant or.

Coat of Arms.—(Confirmed in 1566.) Black, featuring three lions standing on their hind legs in gold.

Present Representative, Charles John Eyston, Esq.

Present Representative, Charles John Eyston, Esq.





Clarke of Ardington.

arms_page005.jpg

The pedigree begins with John Clarke, of Basledon, in this county, living there the latter part of the fifteenth century. The family afterwards removed to Ardington, where they were established, according to Lysons, in the reign of Henry VII. The Visitations of 1566 and 1623 record five generations of the Clarkes before the year 1600.

The family tree starts with John Clarke from Basledon in this county, who lived there during the latter part of the 15th century. The family later moved to Ardington, where they were reportedly established, according to Lysons, during the reign of Henry VII. The Visitations of 1566 and 1623 document five generations of the Clarkes before the year 1600.

See the Visitation of Berks, 1566. Harl. MS. 5822, 22 b, and Harl. 1532. See also Lysons's Berkshire, pp. 180, 186, and Clarke's Hundred of Wanting, p. 56.

See the Visitation of Berks, 1566. Harl. MS. 5822, 22 b, and Harl. 1532. See also Lysons's Berkshire, pp. 180, 186, and Clarke's Hundred of Wanting, p. 56.

Arms.—(Confirmed Oct. 22, 1600.) Argent, on a fess sable three plates between three crosses patée of the second. Sometimes the fess is placed between six crosses patée.

Arms.—(Confirmed Oct. 22, 1600.) Silver, on a black band with three roundels flanked by three black crosses. Sometimes the band is shown between six black crosses.

Present Representative, William Nelson Clarke, Esq.

Present Representative, William Nelson Clarke, Esq.





BUCKINGHAMSHIRE.

Knightly.

Chetwode of Chetwode, Baronet 1700.

arms_page006.jpg

This very ancient family is lineally descended from Robert de Thain, who held Chetwode under the Bishop of Baieux in the time of William the Conqueror, as appears by Domesday Book.

This very old family is directly descended from Robert de Thain, who held Chetwode under the Bishop of Baieux during the time of William the Conqueror, as shown in the Domesday Book.

John de Chetwode having during the reign of Edward III. married the heiress of Oakeley, of Oakeley in Staffordshire, the family have mostly resided there, as well as at Ansley Hall in Warwickshire, derived from the heiress of Ludford in 1821.

John de Chetwode, during the reign of Edward III, married the heiress of Oakeley in Staffordshire. Since then, the family has mainly lived there, as well as at Ansley Hall in Warwickshire, which they acquired from the heiress of Ludford in 1821.

Willis, writing in 1755, says—"This manor of Chetwode, as appears to me, has been in the possession and inheritance of the Chetwodes longer than any estate or manor in this county of Buckingham has continued the property of any other family now there existing."

Willis, writing in 1755, says—"This manor of Chetwode, as it seems to me, has been owned and inherited by the Chetwodes longer than any estate or manor in Buckingham County has remained the property of any other family currently existing there."

See Willis's Buckingham, p. 172; Erdeswicke's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, p. 119; Wotton's Baronetage, iv. p. 82; and Lysons's Buckinghamshire, p. 172.

See Willis's Buckingham, p. 172; Erdeswicke's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, p. 119; Wotton's Baronetage, iv. p. 82; and Lysons's Buckinghamshire, p. 172.

Arms.—Quarterly argent and gules, four crosses patée counterchanged.

Coat of Arms.—Split into four sections, silver and red, with four cross shapes alternating in color.

Present Representative, Sir John Newdigate-Ludford-Chetwode, 5th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Newdigate-Ludford-Chetwode, 5th Baronet.





Dayrell of Lillingstone Dayrell.

arms_page007.jpg

A very ancient and honourable family of Norman descent, who came over with the Conqueror, and seated themselves at Lillingstone before the year 1200, Richard son of Elias Dayrell being seised of a message and half a knight's fee there in King Richard the First's time, or the beginning of King John's reign. Before 1306 the Dayrell became possessed of the fee of the manor, which has ever since continued in the family.

A very old and respected family of Norman descent, who arrived with the Conqueror and settled at Lillingstone before the year 1200, with Richard, son of Elias Dayrell, holding a property and half a knight's fee there during King Richard the First's time or the start of King John's reign. By 1306, the Dayrell family acquired the ownership of the manor, which has remained in the family ever since.

The Dayrell of Shudy Camps, in the county of Cambridge, are a younger branch of this family, sprung from Francis, second son of Paul Dayrell of Lillingstone, sheriff of Buckinghamshire 1579.*

The Dayrell family of Shudy Camps, in Cambridgeshire, is a younger branch of this family, descended from Francis, the second son of Paul Dayrell of Lillingstone, who was the sheriff of Buckinghamshire in 1579.*

See Willis's Buckingham, p. 213; Lysons, p. 595.

See Willis's Buckingham, p. 213; Lysons, p. 595.

Arms.—Azure, a lion rampant or, crowned argent.

Coat of Arms.—Blue background, a lion standing on one hind leg in gold, wearing a silver crown.

Present Representative, Edmund Francis Dayrell, Esq.

Present Representative, Edmund Francis Dayrell, Esq.

* The Darells of Calehill, in Kent, purchased in the 4th Henry IV., and sprung from the Darells of Sesay, in Yorkshire, are supposed to be a younger branch of this venerable family. The extinct family of Darell of Littlecote, Wiltshire, for which see the Topographer, ii. 101, and the Darells of Richmond, Baronet, 1795, are sprung from the house of Calehill.




Grenville of Wotton under Barnwood, Duke of Buckingham 1822, Marquess of Buckingham 1782, Earl Temple 1749, Viscount and Baron Cobham 1718.

arms_page008.jpg

There is good reason to believe that this family, seated at Wotton from the reign of Henry I., is a collateral branch of the Grenvilles of the West. The manor of Wotton, among many others, was given by William I. to Walter Giffard, Earl of Buckingham. Isabel, daughter and coheir of Walter the second Earl, is said to have brought it in marriage, about the year 1097, to Richard de Grenville.

There is good reason to believe that this family, seated at Wotton since the reign of Henry I, is a collateral branch of the Grenvilles of the West. The manor of Wotton, along with many others, was given by William I to Walter Giffard, Earl of Buckingham. Isabel, the daughter and coheir of Walter the second Earl, is said to have brought it in marriage, around the year 1097, to Richard de Grenville.

The consequence of this family in modern times is owing to matches with the heiresses of the great houses of Temple, Nugent, and Chandos.

The result of this family today is due to marriages with the heiresses of the prominent houses of Temple, Nugent, and Chandos.

See Brydges's Collins's Peerage, ii. p. 390, and Lysons, p. 673. See also Moule's Bibliotheca Herald, p. 563, for an account of the MS., formerly at Stowe, viz. The original Evidences of the Grenville Family, collected by Richard Grenville, of Wotton, Esq. during the civil wars of the seventeenth century.

See Brydges's Collins's Peerage, ii. p. 390, and Lysons, p. 673. See also Moule's Bibliotheca Herald, p. 563, for an account of the manuscript, formerly at Stowe, specifically The original Evidences of the Grenville Family, collected by Richard Grenville, of Wotton, Esq. during the civil wars of the seventeenth century.

Arms.—Vert, on a cross argent five torteauxes.

Coat of Arms.—Green background with a silver cross featuring five red circles.

Present Representative, Richard Plantagenet Campbell Temple-Nugent-Brydges-Chandos-Grenville, 3rd Duke of Buckingham.

Present Representative, Richard Plantagenet Campbell Temple-Nugent-Brydges-Chandos-Grenville, 3rd Duke of Buckingham.





Harcourt of Ankerwycke.

arms_page009.jpg

On the decease of the last Earl Harcourt, in 1830, the representation in the male line of the illustrious House of Harcourt devolved on this family, descended from a younger brother of Simon, first Viscount Harcourt, and the heiress of Lee. Stanton Harcourt, in the county of Oxford, was possessed by the ancestors of this great House in 1166, and continued in the family till the extinction of the elder line in 1830. The pedigree is traced to Robert de Harcourt, who married Joan, daughter of Robert Beaumont, Earl of Mellent, and who was grandson of Robert who attended William the Conqueror in his expedition to England in 1066.

Upon the death of the last Earl Harcourt in 1830, the representation of the male line of the prestigious House of Harcourt passed to this family, which descends from a younger brother of Simon, the first Viscount Harcourt, and the heiress of Lee. Stanton Harcourt, in Oxfordshire, was owned by the ancestors of this prominent House since 1166 and remained in the family until the elder line ended in 1830. The family lineage can be traced back to Robert de Harcourt, who married Joan, the daughter of Robert Beaumont, Earl of Mellent, and was the grandson of Robert who served William the Conqueror during his campaign in England in 1066.

See Brydges's Collins's Peerage, iv. p. 428; and Nichols's Leicestershire, iv. pt. 2. p. 519.*

See Brydges's Collins's Peerage, iv. p. 428; and Nichols's Leicestershire, iv. pt. 2. p. 519.*

Arms.—Gules, two bars or. This coat was borne by Sir John de Harcourt in the reign of Edward II. Thomas Harecourt, the reverse, in the reign of Richard II. Rolls of the period.

Coat of Arms.—Red with two gold bars. This coat was used by Sir John de Harcourt during the reign of Edward II. Thomas Harecourt had the reverse during the reign of Richard II. Records from that time.

Present Representative, George Simon Harcourt, Esq.

Present Representative, George Simon Harcourt, Esq.





Gentle.

Lovett of Liscombe.

arms_page010.jpg

Vitalis Lovett of Rushton, in the county of Northampton, who lived in the reign of Henry II., appears to be the first proved ancestor of this venerable family, said to be of Norman origin. William Lovett of Rushton, the son of Vitalis, held certain lands in Henwick, also in Northamptonshire, of Richard Engaine and his heirs by the service of finding two horsemen to follow the said Richard to hunt the wolf in any part of England. This service was remitted to John Lovet, son or grandson of William, in the reign of Edward I., and in lieu thereof an annual rent-charge of ten shillings was imposed. Soon after this period, viz: in 1304, (33 Edw. I.) Liscombe in the parish of Soulbury came into the family, being in the possession of Robert Lovett and Sarah his wife, daughter and heir of Sir Roger Turvile, from the second marriage of their son Thomas, descended the Lovetts of Astwell in Northamptonshire, since the reign of Elizabeth represented in the female line by the Shirleys Earls Ferrers. Liscombe has from the beginning of the fourteenth century remained the inheritance of the elder branch of the Lovetts, though the direct descent has been often interrupted. In 1781, Jonathan Lovett, the representative of the family, was created a baronet by King George III. His Majesty's remark on this occasion is preserved in Betham's Baronetage. "In the summer of 1781, the Earl of Chesterfield having been some time absent from court, was asked by the King where he had been so long? 'On a visit to Mr. Lovett of Buckinghamshire,' said the Earl. 'Ah,' said the King, 'is that Lovett of Liscombe? They are of the genuine old Norman breed, how happens it that they are not baronets? would they accept the title? Go tell him,' continued the King, 'is that the title is much at his service; they have ever stuck to the Crown at a pinch.'" The same work also gives a very curious, and to an antiquary very tantalizing, account of the ancient armour and documents once preserved at Liscombe, and describes their melancholy fate. Sir Jonathan Lovett having died without surviving male issue in 1812, the title of Baronet became extinct and the property descended to his daughters; on the decease of the survivor, Miss Eliza Lovett, in 1861, the ancient seat of this venerable family reverted by her will to the next male heir, the present representative of the family, descended from a younger brother of Sir Jonathan Lovett, baronet.

Vitalis Lovett of Rushton, in Northamptonshire, who lived during the reign of Henry II, is believed to be the first confirmed ancestor of this distinguished family, which is said to have Norman roots. William Lovett of Rushton, the son of Vitalis, held lands in Henwick, also in Northamptonshire, from Richard Engaine and his heirs in exchange for providing two horsemen to accompany Richard in hunting wolves anywhere in England. This obligation was eased for John Lovet, the son or grandson of William, during the reign of Edward I, and instead, he was required to pay an annual rent of ten shillings. Shortly after this, in 1304 (33 Edw. I), Liscombe in the parish of Soulbury came into the family when it was owned by Robert Lovett and his wife Sarah, the daughter and heir of Sir Roger Turvile. From the second marriage of their son Thomas came the Lovetts of Astwell in Northamptonshire, who have been represented in the female line by the Shirleys, Earls Ferrers, since the reign of Elizabeth. Since the beginning of the fourteenth century, Liscombe has remained the estate of the elder branch of the Lovetts, although direct descent has often been broken. In 1781, Jonathan Lovett, the family's representative, was made a baronet by King George III. His Majesty's comment on the occasion is documented in Betham's Baronetage: "In the summer of 1781, the Earl of Chesterfield, having been absent from court for a while, was asked by the King where he had been so long? 'On a visit to Mr. Lovett of Buckinghamshire,' the Earl replied. 'Ah,' said the King, 'is that Lovett of Liscombe? They are of the genuine old Norman breed. Why aren't they baronets? Would they accept the title? Go tell him,' the King continued, 'that the title is very much at his service; they have always supported the Crown in tough times.'" The same source also provides a fascinating yet frustrating account of the ancient armor and documents once kept at Liscombe and describes their unfortunate fate. Sir Jonathan Lovett died without surviving male heirs in 1812, which led to the extinction of the Baronet title, with the property passing to his daughters. Upon the death of the surviving daughter, Miss Eliza Lovett, in 1861, the historic estate of this esteemed family was transferred through her will to the next male heir, the current representative of the family, who descends from a younger brother of Sir Jonathan Lovett, baronet.

See Baker's Northamptonshire, i. p. 732; Lipscombe's Buckinghamshire, iii. p. 457; Stemmata Shirleiana, pr. pr., 1841, p. 58; Collectanea Topog. et Genealog. vi. p. 300, and Betham's Baronetage.

See Baker's Northamptonshire, i. p. 732; Lipscombe's Buckinghamshire, iii. p. 457; Stemmata Shirleiana, pr. pr., 1841, p. 58; Collectanea Topog. et Genealog. vi. p. 300, and Betham's Baronetage.

Arms.—Evidently allusive to the name, and to the service of hunting the wolf, Argent, three wolves passant in pale sable, armed and langued gules.

Arms.—Clearly referencing the name and purpose of hunting the wolf, Silver, three wolves walking in a line, black, with red claws and tongues.

Present Representative, Jonathan Vaughan Lovett, Esq.

Present Representative, Jonathan Vaughan Lovett, Esq.





CAMBRIDGESHIRE.

Gentle.

Bendyshe of Barrington.

arms_page012.jpg

The name is local, from Bendish, in the parish of Radwinter, in Essex, where Peter Westley was seated at a very early period. His grandson was called Ralf of Westley, alias Bendishe, and from him this ancient family, one branch of which was long settled at Steeple Bumstead, in Essex, is descended. A manor in Barrington came from the heiress of Bradfield early in the fifteenth century, and had acquired the name of "The Manor of Bendyshe" so far back as the year 1493; it has ever since remained the inheritance of this the eldest line of the Bendyshe family, of whom a younger branch was of Topfield Hall, in Hadley, co. Suffolk, whose heiress married Doyley of Overbury, also of Steeple Bumstead before mentioned, created Baronet in 1611, extinct in 1717; and other branches again were of Hadley and Turvey in Bedfordshire.

The name is local, from Bendish, in the parish of Radwinter, in Essex, where Peter Westley settled quite early on. His grandson was named Ralf of Westley, also known as Bendishe, and from him the ancient family descends, one branch of which was long established at Steeple Bumstead, in Essex. A manor in Barrington came from the heiress of Bradfield in the early fifteenth century and was referred to as "The Manor of Bendyshe" as early as 1493; it has since remained the inheritance of this oldest line of the Bendyshe family, from which a younger branch was at Topfield Hall in Hadley, Suffolk. This branch's heiress married Doyley of Overbury, also from Steeple Bumstead mentioned earlier, who was made a Baronet in 1611 and became extinct in 1717. Other branches were located in Hadley and Turvey in Bedfordshire.

See Lysons's Cambridgeshire, p. 86, and the Visitation of Essex 1612, Harl. MS. 6095, fol. 16, where is a good pedigree of Bendyshe, brought down to William Bendyshe, Esq. tenth in descent from Peter Westley.

See Lysons's Cambridgeshire, p. 86, and the Visitation of Essex 1612, Harl. MS. 6095, fol. 16, where there is a good family tree of Bendyshe, descending to William Bendyshe, Esq., who is the tenth generation from Peter Westley.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron sable between three ram's heads erased azure.

Arms.—Silver, with a black chevron between three blue ram's heads severed at the neck.

Present Representative, John Bendyshe, Esq.

Present Rep, John Bendyshe, Esq.





CHESHIRE.

Knightly.

Davenport of Woodford.

arms_page013.jpg

The Davenports claim precedence among the knightly families of Cheshire,—that "seed-plot of gentry," "the mother and the nurse of the gentility of England," and are traced directly to the Conquest. The elder line, which Leland terms "the best and first house of the Davenports at Devonport; a great old house covered with leade on the Ripe of Daven, three miles above Congleton," became extinct in 1674. The coheiresses married Davies and Davenport of Woodford. Ormus de Daumporte, living in the time of William I., is the first recorded ancestor of this family. To his son, Richard de Dauneporte, Hugh Earl of Chester gave the chief foresterships of the forests of Leek and Macclesfield about 1166, a feudal office still held by this house.

The Davenports claim precedence among the noble families of Cheshire, often referred to as "the birthplace of gentry," "the mother and nurturer of the gentility of England," and can be traced directly to the Conquest. The elder line, which Leland calls "the best and first house of the Davenports at Devonport; a grand old house covered with lead on the River of Daven, three miles above Congleton," became extinct in 1674. The coheiresses married into the Davies and Davenport families of Woodford. Ormus de Daumporte, who lived during the time of William I, is the earliest recorded ancestor of this family. His son, Richard de Dauneporte, was appointed chief forest steward of the forests of Leek and Macclesfield by Hugh, Earl of Chester, around 1166, a feudal role still held by this house.

The present family are sprung from Nicholas, third son of Sir John or Jenkin Davenport, of Wheltrough and Henbury, who was himself a younger son of Thomas, second son of Sir Thomas Davenport of Davenport, the 13th of Edward II. Woodford was granted by John Stafford and Isabella his wife, about the time of Edward III., to John, third son of Thomas Davenport of Wheltrough, (an elder line not traced beyond 1677,) while the Davenports of Henbury were extinct before 1664. Davenport of Calveley, founded by Arthur, sixth son of Sir John Davenport of Davenport, killed at Shrewsbury in 1403, became extinct in 1771. The coheiresses married Bromley and Davenport of Woodford. Davenport of Bramhall, founded by the second son of Thomas Davenport of Wheltrough and the heiress of Bramhall, in the time of Edward III., survived till 1838. The Davenports of Davenport House, in the parish of Worfield, in Shropshire, are the only younger branch now remaining; they spring from the Davenports of Chorley and the heiress of Bromley of Hallon or Hawn, in the parish of Worfield. See Blakeway's Sheriffs of Salop, pp. 85, 143, 228.

The current family descends from Nicholas, the third son of Sir John or Jenkin Davenport, from Wheltrough and Henbury, who was a younger son of Thomas, the second son of Sir Thomas Davenport of Davenport, during the reign of Edward II. Woodford was granted by John Stafford and his wife Isabella, around the time of Edward III, to John, the third son of Thomas Davenport of Wheltrough (an earlier line not traced beyond 1677), while the Davenports of Henbury had died out before 1664. The Davenport family from Calveley, established by Arthur, the sixth son of Sir John Davenport of Davenport, who was killed at Shrewsbury in 1403, became extinct in 1771. The coheiresses married into the Bromley family and Davenport of Woodford. The Davenport family from Bramhall, founded by the second son of Thomas Davenport of Wheltrough and the heiress of Bramhall, during the time of Edward III, survived until 1838. The Davenports of Davenport House, located in the parish of Worfield in Shropshire, are the only remaining younger branch; they trace their lineage back to the Davenports of Chorley and the heiress of Bromley of Hallon or Hawn, in the parish of Worfield. See Blakeway's Sheriffs of Salop, pp. 85, 143, 228.

For Davenport of Davenport and Woodford, see Ormerod's Cheshire, iii. 39, 346, 357; for those of Calveley, ib. ii. 153; Henbury, iii. 352; Bramhall, iii. 401; Chorley, iii. 312. See also Leland's Itin., vii. fol. 42, and Harl. MSS. 2119, for a good pedigree of the family drawn from original evidences.

For Davenport of Davenport and Woodford, see Ormerod's Cheshire, iii. 39, 346, 357; for those of Calveley, ib. ii. 153; Henbury, iii. 352; Bramhall, iii. 401; Chorley, iii. 312. Also, refer to Leland's Itin., vii. fol. 42, and Harl. MSS. 2119, for a solid family tree based on original records.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three cross-crosslets fitchée sable. The crest of this family, a felon's head, souped proper, haltered or, alludes to the power of life and death within the Forests of Leek and Macclesfield, granted by Hugh Earl of Chester.

Arms.—Silver, a chevron between three black cross-crosslets. The crest of this family, a felon's head, shown naturally, with a golden halter, symbolizes the power over life and death in the Forests of Leek and Macclesfield, granted by Hugh, Earl of Chester.

Present Representative, Arthur Henry Davenport, Esq.

Present Representative, Arthur Henry Davenport, Esq.





Grosvenor of Eaton, Marquess of Westminster 1831, Earl Grosvenor 1784, Baron Grosvenor 1761, Baronet 1662.

arms_page014.jpg

Descended from Gilbert le Grosvenor, nephew of Hugh Lupus, Earl of Chester; the pedigree of this ancient family is, thanks to the famous controversy with the Scropes, well ascertained. The principal line of the Grosvenors was seated at Hulme, in this county, in the hundred of Northwich, and was extinct in the 22nd year of Henry VI. The Grosvenors of Eaton descend from Ralph second son of Sir Thomas Grosvenor of Hulme, who married Joan, sole daughter and heir of John Eaton, of Eton or Eaton, Esq. early in the fifteenth century. The match of Sir Thomas Grosvenor, Bart. in 1676, with Mary, sole daughter and heir of Alexander Davies, of Ebury, in the county of Middlesex, Esq. laid the foundation of the great wealth and consequent honours of this family.

Descended from Gilbert le Grosvenor, the nephew of Hugh Lupus, Earl of Chester, the lineage of this ancient family is well-documented, thanks to the famous dispute with the Scropes. The main line of the Grosvenors was based in Hulme, in this county, within the hundred of Northwich, and it ended in the 22nd year of Henry VI. The Grosvenors of Eaton trace their roots back to Ralph, the second son of Sir Thomas Grosvenor of Hulme, who married Joan, the only daughter and heir of John Eaton, of Eton or Eaton, Esq., in the early fifteenth century. The union of Sir Thomas Grosvenor, Bart., in 1676, with Mary, the only daughter and heir of Alexander Davies, of Ebury, in Middlesex, Esq., established the substantial wealth and resulting honors of this family.

Younger branches: the Earl of Wilton 1801; the Baron Ebury 1857.

Younger branches: the Earl of Wilton 1801; the Baron Ebury 1857.

See Ormerod, ii. 454, and iii. 87; Brydges's Collins, v. 239; and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll passim.

See Ormerod, ii. 454, and iii. 87; Brydges's Collins, v. 239; and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll passim.

Arms.—Azure, a garb or, used since the sentence of the Court in the cause of Sir Richard le Scrope and Sir Robert le Grosvenor in 1389, instead of Azure, a bend or, and allusive to his descent from the ancient Earls of Chester.

Arms.—Blue, a wheat sheaf in gold, used since the ruling of the Court in the case of Sir Richard le Scrope and Sir Robert le Grosvenor in 1389, instead of Blue, a diagonal stripe in gold, and signifies his descent from the ancient Earls of Chester.

Present Representative, Richard Grosvenor, 2nd Marquess of Westminster, K.G.

Present Representative, Richard Grosvenor, 2nd Marquess of Westminster, K.G.





Egerton of Oulton, Baronet 1617.

arms_page015.jpg

This is the principal male branch of the great House of Egerton, formerly Earls and Dukes of Bridgewater and Earl of Wilton. The pedigree begins with Philip Goch, second son of David de Malpas, surnamed le Clerk, which David was lord of a moiety of the Barony of Malpas. The present family is descended from Sir Philip Egerton, third son of Sir Rowland Egerton, of Egerton and Oulton, Baronet, who died in 1698. The Baronetcy devolved on Sir John Egerton, uncle of the present Baronet, on the death of the Earl of Wilton, and extinction of the elder line, in 1814. Oulton came from the heiress of Hugh Done, anno 1498. It is thus mentioned in Leland's Itinerary: "The auncientest of the Egertons dwellith now at Oldeton, and Egerton buildith ther now." (Itin. vii. fol. 42.) Younger branch, Egerton-Warburton, of Warburton and Arley, in this county.

This is the main male line of the great House of Egerton, which used to be Earls and Dukes of Bridgewater and the Earl of Wilton. The family tree starts with Philip Goch, the second son of David de Malpas, also known as le Clerk, who was the lord of half of the Barony of Malpas. The current family is descended from Sir Philip Egerton, the third son of Sir Rowland Egerton of Egerton and Oulton, Baronet, who passed away in 1698. The Baronetcy passed to Sir John Egerton, the uncle of the current Baronet, following the death of the Earl of Wilton and the end of the elder line in 1814. Oulton came from the heiress of Hugh Done in the year 1498. Leland's Itinerary mentions it like this: "The oldest of the Egertons now lives at Oldeton, and Egerton is building there now." (Itin. vii. fol. 42.) A younger branch, Egerton-Warburton, resides in Warburton and Arley, in this county.

See Wotton's Baronetage, i. 271; Brydges's Collins, iii. 170, v. 528; Ormerod, ii. 118, 350; and for many curious particulars of the Bridgewater Egertons, see the Topographer, ii. 136, &c.

See Wotton's Baronetage, i. 271; Brydges's Collins, iii. 170, v. 528; Ormerod, ii. 118, 350; and for many interesting details about the Bridgewater Egertons, see the Topographer, ii. 136, &c.

Arms.—Argent, a lion rampant gules between three pheons sable. The pheons were the ancient arms of Malpas; the lion was added by Uryan Egerton, about the middle of the fourteenth century; according to tradition, an augmentation granted as a reward for his services in the Scotch wars.

Arms.—Silver, a red lion standing upright between three black arrowheads. The arrowheads were the historical arms of Malpas; the lion was added by Uryan Egerton around the mid-fourteenth century. According to tradition, this addition was granted as a reward for his contributions in the Scottish wars.

Present Representative, Sir Philip de Malpas Grey-Egerton, 10th Baronet, M. P. for S. Cheshire.

Present Representative, Sir Philip de Malpas Grey-Egerton, 10th Baronet, Member of Parliament for South Cheshire.





Cholmondeley of Cholmondeley, Marquess of Cholmondeley 1815, Earl of Cholmondeley 1706, Baron 1689.

arms_page016.jpg

Descended with the Egertons from the Barons of Malpas, and immediately from Robert de Cholmondelegh, second son of William Belward, lord of a moiety of the Barony of Malpas, and younger brother of David the ancestor of the Egertons; which Robert was seated at Cholmondeley in the reign of King John.

Descended from the Egertons, who were originally from the Barons of Malpas, and directly from Robert de Cholmondelegh, the second son of William Belward, who was the lord of half of the Barony of Malpas and the younger brother of David, the ancestor of the Egertons; this Robert settled at Cholmondeley during the reign of King John.

Younger branches. Cholmeley of Whitby, in Yorkshire, Baronet 1641, extinct 1688; descended from Robert, younger son of Hugh Cholmondeley, temp. Edw. III. See the Memoirs of Sir Hugh Cholmeley, Knight and Baronet, a curious book privately printed in 1787.—Cholmeley of Brandsby, since the extinction of the Whitby family the only representative of the Cholmondeleys of Yorkshire.—Cholmeley of Easton, co. Lincoln, Baronet 1806, descended from Sir Henry Cholmeley, of Burton Coggles, co. Lincoln, who died in 1620.

Younger branches. Cholmeley of Whitby, in Yorkshire, Baronet 1641, extinct 1688; descended from Robert, the younger son of Hugh Cholmondeley, during the reign of Edward III. See the Memoirs of Sir Hugh Cholmeley, Knight and Baronet, an interesting book privately printed in 1787.—Cholmeley of Brandsby, since the Whitby family died out, the only representative of the Cholmondeleys of Yorkshire.—Cholmeley of Easton, co. Lincoln, Baronet 1806, descended from Sir Henry Cholmeley, of Burton Coggles, co. Lincoln, who died in 1620.

Cholmondeley of Vale Royal in this county, Baron Delamere 1821, descended from Thomas, younger son of Sir Hugh Cholmondeley of Cholmondeley, who died in 1501.

Cholmondeley of Vale Royal in this county, Baron Delamere 1821, descended from Thomas, the younger son of Sir Hugh Cholmondeley of Cholmondeley, who passed away in 1501.

See Ormerod, ii. 356, and for Cholmondeley of Vale Royal, ii. 78. Brydges's Collins, iv. 16.

See Ormerod, ii. 356, and for Cholmondeley of Vale Royal, ii. 78. Brydges's Collins, iv. 16.

Arms.—Gules, two helmets in chief argent, garnished or, and in base a garb of the third.

Coat of Arms.—Red, with two silver helmets at the top, edged in gold, and at the bottom, a sheaf of yellow wheat.

Present Representative, George Horatio Cholmondeley, 2nd Marquess of Cholmondeley.

Present Representative, George Horatio Cholmondeley, 2nd Marquess of Cholmondeley.





Tatton, called Egerton of Tatton, Baron Egerton of Tatton 1859.

arms_page017.jpg

Robert Tatton of Kenworthy, in Northenden, who married the heiress of William de Withenshaw, alias Massey, about the latter end of the reign of Edward III., is the first proved ancestor of this family, but there is reason to believe that he was descended from the much more ancient house of the name who were seated at Tatton in the twelfth century. Withenshaw, now the seat of the younger branch of this family, remained from the period above mentioned the inheritance and residence of the Tattons, until the decease of Samuel Egerton, Esq. in 1780, when the estate of Tatton, which is supposed to have given name to the family, devolved by his will on William Tatton of Withenshaw, Esq., who had married Hester, sister of Mr. Egerton. Tatton had passed to the Egertons through the families of Tatton, Massey, Stanley, and Brereton.

Robert Tatton of Kenworthy, in Northenden, who married the heiress of William de Withenshaw, also known as Massey, toward the end of Edward III's reign, is the first proved ancestor of this family. However, there's reason to believe he was descended from a much older house of the same name that was established at Tatton in the twelfth century. Withenshaw, now the home of the younger branch of this family, remained the property and residence of the Tattons from the time mentioned until the death of Samuel Egerton, Esq. in 1780. After his passing, the estate of Tatton, which is thought to have given the family its name, was passed on by his will to William Tatton of Withenshaw, Esq., who had married Hester, sister of Mr. Egerton. Tatton had come to the Egertons through the families of Tatton, Massey, Stanley, and Brereton.

Younger branch, Tatton of Withenshaw, in this county. See Ormerod, iii. 315, and Gentleman's Magazine 1798, 930.

Younger branch, Tatton of Withenshaw, in this county. See Ormerod, iii. 315, and Gentleman's Magazine 1798, 930.

Arms.—Quarterly argent and gules, four crescents counterchanged. The arms are perhaps founded on the coat of Massey.

Coat of Arms.—Divided into four sections: silver and red, featuring four crescent shapes in alternating colors. These arms are probably inspired by the coat of Massey.

Present Representative, William Tatton Egerton, Baron Egerton of Tatton.

Present Representative, William Tatton Egerton, Baron Egerton of Tatton.





Bunbury of Stanney, Baronet 1681.

arms_page018.jpg

A family of great antiquity, descended from Henry de Boneberi, in the time of Stephen, a younger brother of the House of St. Pierre in Normandy. William de Boneberi, son of Henry, was Lord of Boneberi in the reign of Richard I. But the direct ancestor was David brother of Henry, whose great-grandson Alexander de Bunbury was living in the fifteenth of Henry III. Stanney, still the inheritance, but not the residence, of the Bunburys, came from the heiress of the same name in the seventeenth of Edward III.

A family with a long history, descended from Henry de Boneberi during the time of Stephen, who was a younger brother of the House of St. Pierre in Normandy. William de Boneberi, Henry's son, was Lord of Boneberi during Richard I's reign. However, the direct ancestor was David, Henry's brother, whose great-grandson Alexander de Bunbury was alive in the fifteenth year of Henry III. Stanney, still the property but not the home of the Bunburys, came from the heiress of the same name in the seventeenth year of Edward III.

See Ormerod, ii. 216, and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 687.

See Ormerod, ii. 216, and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 687.

Arms.—Argent, on a bend sable three chessrooks of the field.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a black diagonal stripe that has three chess rooks in their natural colors.

Present Representative, Sir Charles James Fox Bunbury, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Charles James Fox Bunbury, 8th Baronet.





Leycester of Toft.

arms_page019a.jpg

Descended from Sir Nicholas Leycester, who acquired the manor of Nether-Tabley in marriage, and died in 1295. The male line of the eldest branch of this family, established at Nether-Tabley, became extinct in 1742. The present and younger branch springs from Ralph, younger brother of John Leycester of Tabley, who married Joan, daughter and heir of Robert Toft of Toft: she was a widow in 1390. The antiquary Sir Peter was of the Tabley line.

Descended from Sir Nicholas Leycester, who gained the manor of Nether-Tabley through marriage and passed away in 1295. The male line of the oldest branch of this family, established at Nether-Tabley, became extinct in 1742. The current and younger branch originates from Ralph, the younger brother of John Leycester of Tabley, who married Joan, the daughter and heir of Robert Toft of Toft; she was a widow in 1390. The antiquarian Sir Peter was part of the Tabley line.

Younger branch, Leycester of Whiteplace, co. Berks.

Younger branch, Leycester of Whiteplace, Berks County.

See Ormerod, i. 385, 456; iii. 190.

See Ormerod, i. 385, 456; iii. 190.

Arms.—Azure, a fess or, fretty gules, between two fleurs-de-lis of the second. Another coat was granted by Dethick to Sir Ralph Leycester of Toft, the second year of Edward VI., viz. Sable, on a fess engrailed between three falcons volant argent, beaked and membered or, a lion's head caboshed azure between two covered cups gules. But this very unnecessary and overloaded coat does not appear to have been used.

Coat of Arms.—Blue background with a gold stripe crossed with red between two gold fleurs-de-lis. Another coat was granted by Dethick to Sir Ralph Leycester of Toft in the second year of Edward VI., specifically, Black background with an indented gold stripe between three flying silver falcons, which have gold beaks and feet, and a blue lion's head facing forward between two red covered cups. However, this rather complicated and elaborate coat doesn’t appear to have been used.

Present Representative, Ralph Oswald Leycester, Esq.

Present Representative, Ralph Oswald Leycester, Esq.





Massie of Coddington.

arms_page019b.jpg

The pedigree in Ormerod begins with Hugh Massie, who married Agnes, daughter and heir of Nicholas Bold, of Coddington. Their son William purchased the manor of Coddington in the eighteenth of Henry VI. The parentage of Hugh Massie is a matter of dispute, but he was probably a younger son of Sir John Massie of Tatton, who died in the eighth of Henry. He is also by others supposed to have been descended from the Massies of Podington, a younger branch of the Barons of Dunham Massey. This family is perhaps the only remnant in the direct male line of the posterity of any of the Cheshire Barons. General Massie, a younger son of this house, was a distinguished officer in the Civil Wars, both in the service of the Commonwealth and in that of Charles II.

The family history in Ormerod starts with Hugh Massie, who married Agnes, the daughter and heir of Nicholas Bold from Coddington. Their son William bought the manor of Coddington in the 18th year of Henry VI. There's some debate about Hugh Massie's parentage, but he was likely a younger son of Sir John Massie of Tatton, who died in the 8th year of Henry. Some believe he was also descended from the Massies of Podington, a younger branch of the Barons of Dunham Massey. This family might be the only remaining direct male line of any of the Cheshire Barons. General Massie, a younger son from this family, was a notable officer during the Civil Wars, serving both the Commonwealth and Charles II.

Younger branches: Massey of Pool-Hall, in this county, descended from the second son of Massie of Coddington, who was born in 1604. From Edward the third son descended the Massies of Rosthorne, also in Cheshire, now extinct. For the extinct branches of Broxton and Podington, see Ormerod, ii. 372 and 308; for Massie of Coddington, ii. 399; for Massie of Pool-Hall, iii. 188.

Younger branches: Massey of Pool-Hall, in this county, came from the second son of Massie of Coddington, who was born in 1604. The third son, Edward, is the ancestor of the Massies of Rosthorne, also in Cheshire, which is now extinct. For the extinct branches of Broxton and Podington, see Ormerod, ii. 372 and 308; for Massie of Coddington, ii. 399; for Massie of Pool-Hall, iii. 188.

Arms.—Quarterly gules and or, in the first and fourth three fleurs-de-lis argent, a canton of the third. There was a dispute about the arms of Massey between the Houses of Tatton and Podington (for which see "The Scrope and Grosvenor Roll," vol. ii. p. 262), which was decided in 1378 by the arbitration of Sir Hugh Calveley and others. The present coat, except that the first and second quarters were or, and the canton omitted, was awarded to Massey of Podington. Massey of Tatton bore the same arms with three escallops argent in lieu of the fleurs-de-lis. The elder line of Dunham bore Quarterly or and gules, in the second quarter a lion passant argent.

Coat of Arms.—Divided quarterly in red and gold, with three silver fleurs-de-lis in the first and fourth sections, and one third of the same color. There was a dispute regarding the arms of Massey between the Tatton and Podington families (for details, see "The Scrope and Grosvenor Roll," vol. ii. p. 262), which was resolved in 1378 by the arbitration of Sir Hugh Calveley and others. The current coat, except that the first and second quarters were gold and the canton was omitted, was awarded to Massey of Podington. Massey of Tatton used the same arms but with three silver scallops instead of the fleurs-de-lis. The earlier line of Dunham displayed Quarterly gold and red, featuring a silver lion in the second quarter.

Present Representative, Richard Massie, Esq.

Presenting Representative, Richard Massie, Esq.





Wilbraham of Delamere.

arms_page020.jpg

This family represents the eldest branch of the Wilbrahams of Cheshire, descended from Richard de Wilburgkam, sheriff of this county in the forty-third year of Henry III. In the third of Edward IV. the Wilbrahams were seated at Woodhay, in Cheshire, by a match with the heiress of Golborne: this, the elder line, created Baronet in 1620-1, was extinct in 1692. The present family are descended from the second son of Thomas Wilbraham of Woodhay, and were seated at Townsend in Nantwich in the reign of Elizabeth; they removed to Delamere the latter part of the eighteenth century.

This family represents the oldest branch of the Wilbrahams from Cheshire, descended from Richard de Wilburgkam, who was the sheriff of this county in the forty-third year of Henry III. In the third year of Edward IV, the Wilbrahams settled at Woodhay, in Cheshire, through a marriage with the heiress of Golborne. This elder line was created Baronet in 1620-21 and became extinct in 1692. The current family descends from the second son of Thomas Wilbraham of Woodhay and settled at Townsend in Nantwich during the reign of Elizabeth; they moved to Delamere in the late eighteenth century.

Younger branches: Wilbraham Baron Skelmersdale 1828; and Wilbraham of Rode, in this county, both descended from Randle, younger brother of Roger Wilbraham, of Nantwich, who died in 1754. Wilbraham of Dorfold, sold in 1754, but existing at Falmouth in 1818, was sprung from the youngest son of Richard Wilbraham, of Nantwich, who died in 1612. See Ormerod, ii. 65; iii. 31, 184, 199.

Younger branches: Wilbraham Baron Skelmersdale 1828; and Wilbraham of Rode, in this county, both descended from Randle, the younger brother of Roger Wilbraham, of Nantwich, who died in 1754. Wilbraham of Dorfold, sold in 1754 but still existing at Falmouth in 1818, came from the youngest son of Richard Wilbraham, of Nantwich, who died in 1612. See Ormerod, ii. 65; iii. 31, 184, 199.

Arms.—Argent, three bends wavy azure. The Dorfold branch bore for distinction a canton gules. Additional coat, granted by Flower, temp. Eliz.; Azure, two bars argent, on a canton of the first a wolf's head erased of the second.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, three wavy blue stripes. The Dorfold branch added a red square for distinction. An additional coat was granted by Flower during the reign of Elizabeth; Blue, two silver bars, with a red square featuring a silver wolf's head.

Present Representative, George Fortescue Wilbraham, Esq.

Present Representative, George Fortescue Wilbraham, Esq.





Legh of East Hall, in High Legh.

arms_page021.jpg

Efward de Lega, who appears from his name to have been of Saxon origin, and who lived at or near the period of the Conquest, was the patriarch of this ancient family, of which the principal male line failed in the time of Edward IV. Thomas Legh, of Northwood, in the same parish of High-Legh, the ancestor of the present family, succeeded after a long litigation as the next heir male in the reign of Henry VIII. See Ormerod, i. 358.

Efward de Lega, who seems to have been of Saxon descent based on his name and who lived around the time of the Conquest, was the patriarch of this old family, whose main male line ended during the time of Edward IV. Thomas Legh, from Northwood in the same parish of High-Legh, became the next male heir after a lengthy legal battle during the reign of Henry VIII. See Ormerod, i. 358.

Arms.—Allowed 1566. Argent, a lion rampant gules, armed and langued azure.

Coat of Arms.—Granted in 1566. Silver, featuring a red lion standing on one hind leg, with blue claws and tongue.

Present Representative, George Cornwall Legh, Esq. M.P. for North Cheshire.

Present Representative, George Cornwall Legh, Esq. M.P. for North Cheshire.





Leigh of West Hall, in High Legh.

arms_page022.jpg

Descended from Richard de Lymme, younger son of Hugh de Lymme, which Richard in the latter part of the thirteenth century married Agnes, daughter and sole heir of Richard de Legh, great-grandson of Hamon de Legh, the first mentioned in the pedigree. Richard de Lymme had issue Thomas de Legh, of West Hall, living in 1305.

Descended from Richard de Lymme, the younger son of Hugh de Lymme, Richard married Agnes, the daughter and sole heir of Richard de Legh, in the late thirteenth century. Richard de Legh was the great-grandson of Hamon de Legh, the first person mentioned in the family tree. Richard de Lymme had a son, Thomas de Legh, of West Hall, who was alive in 1305.

Younger branches: Leigh (called Trafford), of Oughtrington, in this county, descended from John second son of Richard Leigh, of West Hall, who died in 1486; for whom see Ormerod, i. 439.

Younger branches: Leigh (known as Trafford) from Oughtrington in this county, are descended from John, the second son of Richard Leigh of West Hall, who passed away in 1486; for more information, see Ormerod, i. 439.

Leigh of Leatherlake House in Surrey, descended from Thomas second son of the Rev. Peter Leigh of West Hall, who died in 1719; and Leigh of South Carolina, Baronet 1773, descended from Peter third son of the same Rev. Peter Leigh. See Ormerod, i. 350.

Leigh of Leatherlake House in Surrey is a descendant of Thomas, the second son of Rev. Peter Leigh of West Hall, who passed away in 1719; and Leigh of South Carolina, Baronet 1773, is a descendant of Peter, the third son of the same Rev. Peter Leigh. See Ormerod, i. 350.

Arms.—Allowed 1563. Or, a lion rampant gules, armed and langued azure. For four descents after the match with Agnes de Legh, her descendants used the coat of Lymme, Gules, a pale fusillé argent, conclusive evidence of the descent of this family from Richard de Lymme, and not from William de Venables, another husband of Agnes de Legh. Indeed, in the Visitation of 1566, this coat of Lymme was allowed to Leigh of West Hall; but in 1584 both the East and West Hall families claimed the lion rampant gules. In 1663 the arms were settled as at present.

Arms.—Granted in 1563. A red lion standing on its hind legs, with blue claws and tongue. For four generations after the alliance with Agnes de Legh, her descendants used the coat of Lymme, Red, with a silver striped vertical band, clearly showing this family's descent from Richard de Lymme, and not from William de Venables, another husband of Agnes de Legh. In fact, during the Visitation of 1566, this coat of Lymme was acknowledged for Leigh of West Hall; however, in 1584 both the East and West Hall families claimed the red lion. In 1663, the arms were confirmed as they are today.

Present Representative, Egerton Leigh, Esq.

Present Rep, Egerton Leigh, Esq.





Aldersey of Aldersey, in the parish of Coddington.

arms_page023a.jpg

The pedigree is traced to Hugh de Aldersey, in the reign of Henry III., soon after which time the family divided into two branches; the estate and manor of Aldersey being also held in separate moieties by the representatives of the two families: one moiety eventually passed by an heir-general to Hatton of Hatton, and has since been united into one estate, by purchase from Dutton of Hatton. A younger branch of this family was seated at Chester, of which was William Aldersey the antiquary, mayor of that city in 1614.

The family lineage goes back to Hugh de Aldersey during the reign of Henry III. Shortly after, the family split into two branches, with the Aldersey estate and manor being held in separate shares by the two family representatives. One share eventually went to an heir-general who became Hatton of Hatton, and has since been combined into one estate through a purchase from Dutton of Hatton. A younger branch of this family established itself in Chester, where William Aldersey, the antiquary, served as mayor in 1614.

See Ormerod, ii. 404.

See Ormerod, vol. 2, p. 404.

Arms.—Gules, on a bend engrailed argent, between two cinquefoils or, three leopard's faces vert. The more ancient coat, given in King's Vale Royal, appears to have been, Sable, three chargers or dishes argent.

Arms.—Red, with a wavy silver stripe, flanked by two gold cinquefoil flowers, and three green leopard faces. The previous coat, mentioned in King's Vale Royal, appears to have been Black, with three golden dishes.

Present Representative, Thomas Aldersey, Esq.

Present Representative, Thomas Aldersey, Esq.





Baskervyle, (called Glegg,) of Old Withington.

arms_page023b.jpg

Ormerod traces this family to Sir John Baskervyle, grantee of a moiety of Old Withington from Robert de Camvyle in 1266, and that estate has ever since remained in the family. In 1758 John Baskervyle, Esq., the representative of the house of Old Withington, having married the heiress of Glegg of Gayton, in this county, assumed that name in lieu of his own.

Ormerod traces this family back to Sir John Baskervyle, who received half of Old Withington from Robert de Camvyle in 1266, and that estate has stayed in the family ever since. In 1758, John Baskervyle, Esq., the representative of the Old Withington house, married the heiress of Glegg of Gayton, in this county, and took that name instead of his own.

See Ormerod, iii. 355; and for Glegg, ib. ii. 285.

See Ormerod, iii. 355; and for Glegg, ib. ii. 285.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron gules between three hurts. This coat, the chevron charged with three fleurs-de-lis or, was borne by "Monsire de Baskervile;" see Sir Harris Nicolas's Roll of Arms temp. E. III.

Arms.—Silver, a red chevron between three blue circles. This coat, the chevron having three golden fleurs-de-lis, was used by "Lord Baskerville;" refer to Sir Harris Nicolas's Roll of Arms from the time of Edward III.

Present Representative, John Baskervyle Glegg, Esq.

Present Representative, John Baskervyle Glegg, Esq.





Brooke of Norton, Baronet 1662.

arms_page024.jpg

Adam Lord of Leighton, in the reign of Henry III., is the first recorded ancestor of this family, who continued at Leighton, the seat of the principal branch of the Brookes, until the extinction of the elder male line, in or about the year 1632. Richard Brooke, younger son of Thomas Brooke of Leighton, purchased Norton from King Henry VIII. in the year 1545, which has remained the residence of his heirs male.

Adam, Lord of Leighton, during the reign of Henry III, is the first recorded ancestor of this family. They lived at Leighton, the primary home of the Brookes, until the main male line ended around 1632. Richard Brooke, the younger son of Thomas Brooke of Leighton, bought Norton from King Henry VIII in 1545, and it has stayed the home of his male descendants.

Younger branches: Broke of Nacton in the county of Suffolk, Baronet 1813; descended from Sir Richard Brooke, Knight, Chief Baron of the Exchequer, in the reign of Henry VIII., youngest son of Thomas Brooke of Leighton, the ancestor of the Norton family. There was a former baronetcy in this family, created 1661, extinct 1693. Brooke of Mere in this county, sprung from Sir Peter Brooke, third son of Thomas Brooke of Norton, established at Mere by purchase in 1632.

Younger branches: Brooke of Nacton in Suffolk, Baronet 1813; descended from Sir Richard Brooke, Knight, Chief Baron of the Exchequer, during the reign of Henry VIII, and the youngest son of Thomas Brooke of Leighton, the ancestor of the Norton family. There was a previous baronetcy in this family, established in 1661, which became extinct in 1693. Brooke of Mere in this county originated from Sir Peter Brooke, the third son of Thomas Brooke of Norton, who was established at Mere by purchase in 1632.

See Ormerod, i. 360, 500; and iii. 241; Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica, i. 22; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 392.

See Ormerod, i. 360, 500; and iii. 241; Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica, i. 22; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 392.

Arms.—Or, a cross engrailed party per pale gules and sable.

Coat of Arms.—Gold, featuring a notched cross split vertically in red and black.

Present Representative, Sir Richard Brooke, 7th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Richard Brooke, 7th Baronet.





Gentle.

Clutton of Chorlton, in the parish of Malpas.

arms_page025a.jpg

Ormerod gives no detailed pedigree, but states that the Cluttons had been settled at Clutton, in the parish of Farndon, in this county, as early as the 21st of Edward I, and that the manor of the same place was held by this family in the time of Henry VI. In the reign of Henry VIII., Roger, third son of Owen Clutton of Courthyn, having married an heiress of Aldersey of Chorlton, became seated there, and was the ancestor of the present family. From Henry, elder brother of this Roger, were descended the Clutton Brocks late of Pensax in Worcestershire, who were there established in the seventeenth century.

Ormerod doesn’t provide a detailed family history but mentions that the Cluttons were established in Clutton, in the parish of Farndon, in this county as early as the 21st year of Edward I's reign. He notes that the manor of the same place was held by this family during the time of Henry VI. In the reign of Henry VIII, Roger, the third son of Owen Clutton of Courthyn, married an heiress from the Aldersey family of Chorlton, settled there, and became the ancestor of the current family. Henry, the older brother of Roger, was the ancestor of the Clutton Brocks, who were settled at Pensax in Worcestershire, where they were established in the seventeenth century.

See Ormerod, ii. 366, 410, and a pedigree of this family in Harleian MS. 2119.

See Ormerod, ii. 366, 410, and a family tree of this family in Harleian MS. 2119.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron ermine, cotised sable, between three annulets gules.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, featuring a black chevron with ermine borders, flanked by three red rings.

Present Representative, Thomas Charlton Clutton, Esq.

Present Representative, Thomas Charlton Clutton, Esq.





Leche of Carden.

arms_page0025b.jpg

The pedigree commences in the reign of Henry IV. with John Leche, (said to be a younger brother of the house of Leche of Chatsworth, in Derbyshire,) who married the heiress of Cawarthyn, or Carden, and settled there about the year 1475. Some pedigrees, however, seat the Leches at Carden as early as the twentieth of Edward III.; and there is also a tradition that the family is descended from the leche, or chirurgeon, of that monarch himself. It is remarkable that Nolan has been the family christian name, with one exception, during thirteen generations.

The family history starts during the reign of Henry IV with John Leche, who is said to be a younger brother of the Leche family from Chatsworth in Derbyshire. He married the heiress of Cawarthyn, or Carden, and settled there around 1475. However, some family trees place the Leches in Carden as far back as the 20th year of Edward III. There is also a tradition that the family descends from the leche, or surgeon, of that king himself. Interestingly, the name Nolan has been the given name for the family, with one exception, for thirteen generations.

Younger branch, extinct in 1694, Leche of Mollington, in this county.

Younger branch, extinct in 1694, Leche of Mollington, in this county.

See Harl. MS. 2119, 50, quoted by Ormerod, ii. 385.

See Harl. MS. 2119, 50, quoted by Ormerod, ii. 385.

Arms.—Ermine, on a chief indented gules three crowns or.

Arms.—Ermine, with a red indented chief featuring three gold crowns.

Present Representative, John Hurleston Leche, Esq.

Present Representative, John Hurleston Leche, Esq.





Barnston of Churton, in the parish of Farndon.

arms_page026.jpg

The descent of this family is not proved beyond Robert Barnston, of Churton, in the third year of Richard II. But Hugh de Barnston was lord of a moiety of Barnston in the twenty-first of Edward I. The pedigree was confirmed in the Visitations of 1613 and 1663-4.

The history of this family can only be traced back to Robert Barnston of Churton, during the third year of Richard II. However, Hugh de Barnston was the lord of half of Barnston in the twenty-first year of Edward I. The family tree was validated during the Visitations of 1613 and 1663-4.

See Ormerod, ii. 408.

See Ormerod, vol. 2, p. 408.

Arms.—Azure, a fess indented ermine between six cross-crosslets fitchée or. Thomas de Bernaston bore this coat, except that the crosses were argent. See the Roll of Arms of the Reign of Edward III.

Coat of Arms.—Blue with a wavy band featuring fur, flanked by six gold cross-crosslets. Thomas de Bernaston had this coat, but the crosses were silver. Refer to the Roll of Arms from the reign of Edward III.

Present Representative, Roger Barnston, Esq.

Present Rep, Roger Barnston, Esq.





Antrobus of Antrobus, Baronet 1815.

arms_page027a.jpg

This is an instance of an ancient family, which, having gone down in the world, has recovered itself by means of commercial pursuits, after centuries of comparative obscurity. Antrobus was sold by Henry Antrobus in the reign of Henry IV., and repurchased by Edmund Antrobus in 1808; he having proved himself a descendant of Henry, youngest son of Henry Antrobus above mentioned. Antrobus of Eaton Hall, in this county, is again a younger branch of this family.

This is an example of an old family that, after experiencing hardship, has rebuilt its status through business ventures after many years of relative obscurity. Henry Antrobus sold Antrobus during the reign of Henry IV, and it was bought back by Edmund Antrobus in 1808; he was able to prove that he was a descendant of Henry, the youngest son of the previously mentioned Henry Antrobus. Antrobus of Eaton Hall, in this county, is another younger branch of this family.

See Ormerod, i. 487; Lysons's Cheshire, p. 532; Debrett's Baronetage, ed. 1836, p. 383.

See Ormerod, i. 487; Lysons's Cheshire, p. 532; Debrett's Baronetage, ed. 1836, p. 383.

Arms.—Lozengy or and azure, on a pale gules three estoiles of the first.

Coat of Arms.—Gold and blue checkered pattern, with a red vertical stripe featuring three bright stars of the same color.

Present Representative, Sir Edmund William Romer Antrobus, 2nd Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Edmund William Romer Antrobus, 2nd Baronet.





Lawton of Lawton.

arms_page027b.jpg

It is not improbable that this family is descended from Robert, a younger son of Vivian de Davenport, who settled at Lawton in the 50th of Henry III. and assumed the local name: this assertion is borne out by the arms, which are evidently founded on those of Davenport. The pedigree is not however traced beyond Hugh Lawton, who married Isabella, daughter of John Madoc, in the reign of Henry VI. The manor of Lawton was purchased by William Lawton, Esq. from King Henry VIII. It had been formerly held by the Abbey of Chester, to which the Lawtons appear to have been tenants from a very early period. Younger branch, Lawton of Lake Marsh, in the county of Cork.

It’s likely that this family descends from Robert, a younger son of Vivian de Davenport, who settled in Lawton during the 50th year of Henry III and took on the local name. This claim is supported by their coat of arms, which clearly draws from those of Davenport. However, the family tree isn’t traced further back than Hugh Lawton, who married Isabella, the daughter of John Madoc, during the reign of Henry VI. William Lawton, Esq. bought the manor of Lawton from King Henry VIII. It had previously been held by the Abbey of Chester, to which the Lawtons seem to have been tenants for a long time. There is a younger branch, Lawton of Lake Marsh, in County Cork.

See Ormerod, iii. 11, and Lysons's Cheshire, p. 673.

See Ormerod, iii. 11, and Lysons's Cheshire, p. 673.

Arms.—Argent, on a fess between three cross-crosslets fitchée sable a cinquefoil of the first.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, with a band featuring three black cross-crosslets and a five-leaf flower in the same color.

Present Representative, John Lawton, Esq.

Present Representative, John Lawton, Esq.





Cotton of Combermere, Viscount Combermere 1826, Baronet 1677.

arms_page028.jpg

There are several places called Cotton, and antiquaries have doubted from which of them the present family is called. The house usually assigned is that of Cotton, near Wem, in Shropshire, where Sir Hugh Cotton was seated in the reign of Edward I., and whose descendant, Roger Cotton, acquired the estate of Alkington, in the same county, by marriage of the heiress, in the reign of Richard II. He was the ancestor of Sir George Cotton, grantee of Combermere after the Dissolution in 1540, from whom the present family directly descend. Younger branch, extinct in the male line, but represented in the female line by R. H. Cotton of Etwall, co. Derby, Esq.

There are several places named Cotton, and historians have debated which one the current family is linked to. The house most commonly identified is the one in Cotton, near Wem, in Shropshire, where Sir Hugh Cotton lived during the reign of Edward I. His descendant, Roger Cotton, gained the estate of Alkington in the same county by marrying the heiress in the reign of Richard II. He was the ancestor of Sir George Cotton, who received Combermere after the Dissolution in 1540, and from him, the current family directly descends. A younger branch went extinct in the male line but is represented in the female line by R. H. Cotton of Etwall, co. Derby, Esq.

MSS. of the late Mr. Joseph Morris of Shrewsbury. See a different account of this family in Ormerod, iii. 212; Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, p. 104; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 611.

MSS. of the late Mr. Joseph Morris of Shrewsbury. See a different account of this family in Ormerod, iii. 212; Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, p. 104; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 611.

Arms.—Azure, a chevron between three hawk's lures, or cotton-hanks, argent.

Arms.—Blue, with a chevron placed between three hawk's lures or cotton hanks in silver.

Present Representative, Wellington Henry Cotton, 2nd Viscount Combermere.

Present Representative, Wellington Henry Cotton, 2nd Viscount Combermere.





CORNWALL.

Knightly.

Trelawnyy of Trelawny, Baronet 1628.

arms_page029.jpg

"The most Cornish gentlemen can better vaunt of their pedigree than their livelyhood," wrote Richard Carew, of Antonie, Esq. in 1602,—"for that they derive from great antiquitie; and I make question whether any shire in England, of but equal quantitie, can muster a like number of faire coat-armours:" and again,

"The most Cornish gentlemen can boast about their lineage more than their livelihoods," wrote Richard Carew, of Antonie, Esq. in 1602,—"for they come from great antiquity; and I wonder if any county in England, of similar size, can show as many beautiful coat-of-arms:" and again,

"By Tre, Pol, and Pen,
You shall know the Cornish men."

There are two manors called Trelawny in Cornwall, one in the parish of Alternon, the other in that of Pelynt; the former was the original seat of the Trelawnys, probably before the Conquest, and here they remained till the extinction of the cider branch in the reign of Henry VI. The latter was purchased from Queen Elizabeth by "Sir Jonathan Trelawny, a knight well spoken, stayed in his cariage, and of thrifty providence," the head of a younger line of this family, in the year 1600; and it has ever since remained the seat of this venerable house. Hamelin, who held Treloen, i.e. Trelawny, under the Earl of Moreton, at the period of the Domesday Survey, is the first recorded ancestor.

There are two manors named Trelawny in Cornwall, one in the parish of Alternon and the other in Pelynt. The first was the original home of the Trelawnys, likely before the Conquest, and they lived there until the cider branch died out during the reign of Henry VI. The second manor was bought from Queen Elizabeth by "Sir Jonathan Trelawny, a well-regarded knight, composed in his behavior, and of prudent foresight," the head of a younger branch of this family, in 1600; it has since been the home of this distinguished house. Hamelin, who held Treloen, i.e., Trelawny, under the Earl of Moreton during the Domesday Survey, is the first documented ancestor.

See Leland's Itin., iii. fol. 20; Carew's Survey of Cornwall, ed. 1602, p. 63 b; Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, i. 546; Lysons's Cornwall, pp. 14 and 257; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 87.

See Leland's Itin., iii. fol. 20; Carew's Survey of Cornwall, ed. 1602, p. 63 b; Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, i. 546; Lysons's Cornwall, pp. 14 and 257; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 87.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron sable. In the reign of Henry V. an augmentation was added, viz. three oak-leaves vert, borne by Sir John Trelawny with the ancient coat, in consequence of his having greatly distinguished himself in the French wars with that monarch.

Coat of Arms.—Silver with a black chevron. During the rule of Henry V, an addition was made, namely three green oak leaves, carried by Sir John Trelawny along with the original coat, in recognition of his notable accomplishments in the French wars under that king.

Present Representative, Sir John Salusbury-Trelawny, 9th Baronet, late M. P. for Tavistock.

Present Representative, Sir John Salusbury-Trelawny, 9th Baronet, former M.P. for Tavistock.





Prideaux of Place, in the parish of Padstow.

arms_page030.jpg

This is the eldest remaining branch of the ancient family of Prideaux, who trace their descend from Paganus, lord of Prideaux Castle, in Luxulion, in this county, in the time of William I.; where the family continued till the latter part of the fourteenth century, when Prideaux passed by an heiress to the Herles of West Herle, in Northumberland. The present family, which was seated at "Place" in the sixteenth century, is sprung from the Prideauxes of Solden, in Holsworthy, in Devonshire, a branch of Prideaux of Thuborough in Sutcombe, in the same county, who were themselves descended from Prideaux of Orcherton in Modbury, also in Devonshire, where the family was established by marriage with the heiress of Orcherton in the reign of Henry III.

This is the oldest surviving branch of the ancient Prideaux family, which traces its lineage back to Paganus, the lord of Prideaux Castle in Luxulion, in this county, during the time of William I. The family remained there until the late 14th century when Prideaux passed to the Herles of West Herle in Northumberland through an heiress. The current family, which established itself at "Place" in the 16th century, descends from the Prideauxes of Solden in Holsworthy, Devonshire, a branch of the Prideaux of Thuborough in Sutcombe in the same county, who themselves were descended from the Prideaux of Orcherton in Modbury, also in Devonshire, where the family was founded through marriage with the heiress of Orcherton during the reign of Henry III.

Younger branch, Prideaux of Netherton, co. Devon, Baronet 1622, founded by Edmund Prideaux, an eminent lawyer, second son of Roger Prideaux of Solden.

Younger branch, Prideaux of Netherton, co. Devon, Baronet 1622, founded by Edmund Prideaux, a notable lawyer, second son of Roger Prideaux of Solden.

See Carew, 143 b; Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, i. 542; Lysons, 252, cxii.; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 515; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 470; Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1, p. 307.

See Carew, 143 b; Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, i. 542; Lysons, 252, cxii.; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 515; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 470; Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1, p. 307.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron sable, a label of three points gules. This was the coat of Orcherton.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, a black chevron, and a red label with three points. This was the coat of Orcherton.

Present Representative, Charles Prideaux-Brune, Esq.

Present Representative, Charles Prideaux-Brune, Esq.





Basset of Tehidy.

arms_page031.jpg

The immediate ancestor of the Cornish Bassets was William Basset, who married in 1150 Cecilia, daughter and coheiress of Alan de Dunstanville, and the daughter of Reginald Fitzhenry, Earl of Cornwall, natural son of Henry I., who thus acquired the manor of Tehidy, which has ever since continued the residence of his descendants of the house of Basset. In the early part of the sixteenth century, John Basset appears to have been the chief of this ancient family: he married Frances daughter and coheir of Arthur Plantagenet, Viscount Lisle, natural son of King Edward IV. From Arthur, his eldest son, descended the Bassets of Heanton Court in Devonshire, extinct in the early part of the present century; and from George, the second son, the house of Tehidy, the elder branch of which were created Barons de Dunstanville in 1797. Extinct 1855.

The immediate ancestor of the Cornish Bassets was William Basset, who married Cecilia in 1150. She was the daughter and co-heiress of Alan de Dunstanville and the daughter of Reginald Fitzhenry, Earl of Cornwall, a natural son of Henry I. He acquired the manor of Tehidy, which has since remained the home of his descendants from the Basset line. In the early 1500s, John Basset was the head of this ancient family; he married Frances, the daughter and co-heir of Arthur Plantagenet, Viscount Lisle, who was a natural son of King Edward IV. From Arthur, his eldest son, came the Bassets of Heanton Court in Devonshire, which became extinct in the early part of this century; and from George, the second son, came the house of Tehidy, whose elder branch was made Barons de Dunstanville in 1797, becoming extinct in 1855.

Leland mentions "the right goodly lordship of Tehidy, and the castelet or pile of Bassets on Carnbray Hill."

Leland talks about "the really impressive lordship of Tehidy, and the castle or fort of Bassets on Carnbray Hill."

See Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, i. 486.

See Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, vol. 1, page 486.

Arms.—Or, three bars wavy gules.

Arms.—Or, three wavy red bars.

Present Representative, John Francis Basset, Esq.

Present Representative, John Francis Basset, Esq.





Vyvyan of Trelowarren, in the parish of Mawgan, Baronet 1644. originally of Trevidern in the parish of St. Burian.

arms_page032.jpg

The first recorded ancestor is Sir Vyel Vyvyan, Knight, who lived in the thirteenth century, and whose descendant John, having married an heiress of Ferrers, succeeded to the lordship of Trelowarren in the reign of Edward IV., which has since continued the seat and residence of this family. The Baronetcy was conferred by King Charles I. on Sir Richard Vyvyan, as a reward for his services in the civil wars of that period.

The first recorded ancestor is Sir Vyel Vyvyan, a knight who lived in the 13th century. His descendant, John, married an heiress of Ferrers and took over the lordship of Trelowarren during Edward IV's reign, which has since been the home of this family. King Charles I awarded the baronetcy to Sir Richard Vyvyan in recognition of his services during the civil wars of that time.

See Leland's Itin. iii. fol. 3; Gilbert's Survey, i. 557; Lysons, pp. xc. and 218; Polwhele's Cornwall, 1803, vol. i. p. 42; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 411.

See Leland's Itin. iii. fol. 3; Gilbert's Survey, i. 557; Lysons, pp. xc. and 218; Polwhele's Cornwall, 1803, vol. i. p. 42; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 411.

Arms.—Argent, a lion rampant gules, armed sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, featuring a red lion standing upright, with black claws.

Present Representative, Sir Richard Rawlinson Vyvyan, 8th Baronet, late M.P. for Helstone.

Present Representative, Sir Richard Rawlinson Vyvyan, 8th Baronet, former Member of Parliament for Helstone.





Molesworth of Pencarrow, in the parish of Egloshayle, Baronet 1689.

arms_page033.jpg

This is a younger branch of the Molesworths of Ireland, Viscount Molesworth of Swords, in the county of Dublin, 1716. They can be traced to the reign of Edward I. as a knightly family, but never remained very long in any one county: they have been seated in Bedfordshire, Huntingdonshire, and Northamptonshire. Sir Walter de Molesworth, the first recorded ancestor, is said to have attended Edward I. in his expedition to the Holy Land. The family estate is believed to have been greatly impoverished by the profuse entertainment of Queen Elizabeth at Fotheringay, by Antony, elder brother of John Molesworth, who settled at Pencarrow in the reign of the same Queen.

This is a younger branch of the Molesworths of Ireland, Viscount Molesworth of Swords, in Dublin County, 1716. They can be traced back to the reign of Edward I as a knightly family, but they never stayed in one county for very long: they have lived in Bedfordshire, Huntingdonshire, and Northamptonshire. Sir Walter de Molesworth, the first recorded ancestor, is said to have accompanied Edward I on his expedition to the Holy Land. The family estate is believed to have been significantly weakened by the lavish entertainment of Queen Elizabeth at Fotheringay, hosted by Antony, the elder brother of John Molesworth, who settled at Pencarrow during the same Queen's reign.

See Gilbert's Cornwall, i. 571; Lysons, xcii. 82; Wotton's Baronetage, iv. 25; Archdall's Lodge, v. 127.

See Gilbert's Cornwall, i. 571; Lysons, xcii. 82; Wotton's Baronetage, iv. 25; Archdall's Lodge, v. 127.

Arms.—Vaire, a border gules charged with cross-crosslets or.

Coat of Arms.—Vairy, with a red border that has golden cross-crosslets.

This coat, except that the crosses were argent, was borne by Sir Walter de Molesworth of co. Huntingdon, as appears by the Roll of Arms of the reign of Edward II. Sir Gilbert Lyndesey (?) of the same county bore the present coat.

This coat, except that the crosses were silver, was used by Sir Walter de Molesworth of Huntingdonshire, as shown in the Roll of Arms from the reign of Edward II. Sir Gilbert Lyndesey (?) from the same county carried the current coat.

Present Representative, the Rev. Sir Paul William Molesworth, 10th Baronet.

Present Representative, the Rev. Sir Paul William Molesworth, 10th Baronet.





Gentle.

Polwhele of Polwhele, in the parish of St. Clement.

arms_page034a.jpg

This venerable family, supposed to be of Saxon origin, traces its descent to one Drogo or Drew, Chamberlain to the Empress Maude, and Grantee of the Manor of Polwhele in the year 1140. The family are said to have been seated there even before the Conquest; there appears however no proof that Drogo was the descendant of Winus de Polhill, the owner of this place in the time of Edward the Confessor. The Rev. Richard Polwhele, the historian of this county, was the representative of the family.

This esteemed family, believed to have Saxon roots, traces its lineage back to Drogo or Drew, who served as Chamberlain to Empress Maude and was granted the Manor of Polwhele in 1140. The family is said to have lived there even before the Conquest; however, there is no evidence that Drogo was a descendant of Winus de Polhill, who owned this land during the reign of Edward the Confessor. The Rev. Richard Polwhele, the historian of this county, was a representative of the family.

See Polwhele's Cornwall, i. 42; Gilbert's Survey, ii. 239; and Lysons, pp. cxi. 60.

See Polwhele's Cornwall, i. 42; Gilbert's Survey, ii. 239; and Lysons, pp. cxi. 60.

Arms.—Sable, a saltier engrailed ermine.

Arms.—Black, a wavy ermine outline.

Present Representative, T. R. Polwhele, Esq.

Present Representative, T. R. Polwhele, Esq.





Trefusis of Trefusis, in the parish of Milor, Baron Clinton 1299.

arms_page034b.jpg

From time immemorial this ancient family have been seated at Trefusis, from whence the name is derived. The pedigree is traced four generations before the year 1292. The ancient Barony of Clinton devolved upon this family, (through the Bolles,) on the death of George third Earl of Orford, in 1791.

This ancient family has been established at Trefusis for as long as anyone can remember, which is where their name comes from. Their lineage can be traced back four generations before 1292. The historic Barony of Clinton passed to this family (through the Bolles) when George, the third Earl of Orford, died in 1791.

See Carew, 150 b; Leland's Itin. iii. 26; Polwhele's Cornwall, i. 42; Gilbert's Cornwall, i. 468.

See Carew, 150 b; Leland's Itin. iii. 26; Polwhele's Cornwall, i. 42; Gilbert's Cornwall, i. 468.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three wharrow spindles sable, which Randle Holmes, in his Academy, p. 288, explains, as a "sort of Spindle used by women at a distaff put under their girdle, so as they oftentimes spin therewith going."

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a chevron between three black wharrow spindles, which Randle Holmes describes in his Academy, p. 288, as a "type of spindle that women used, carried under their girdle so they could often spin while walking."

Present Representative, Charles Rodolph Trefusis, 18th Baron Clinton.

Present Representative, Charles Rodolph Trefusis, 18th Baron Clinton.





Boscawen of Boscawen-Rose, in the parish of St. Burian, Viscount Falmouth 1720.

arms_page035.jpg

Descended from Henry who lived in the reign of King John, and who took the name of Boscawen from the lordship of Boscawen-Rose, still the property of the family. In the reign of Edward III. the Boscawens removed to Tregothnan, their present seat, in consequence of the marriage of John de Boscawen with Joan, daughter and heir of John de Tregothnan of that place, in the parish of St. Michael-Penkevil.

Descended from Henry, who lived during the reign of King John and took the name Boscawen from the estate of Boscawen-Rose, still owned by the family. During the reign of Edward III, the Boscawens moved to Tregothnan, their current residence, due to the marriage of John de Boscawen with Joan, daughter and heir of John de Tregothnan from that location, in the parish of St. Michael-Penkevil.

See Gilbert's Survey, i. 452; Lysons, pp. lxxiv. 50; Brydges's Collins, vi. 62.

See Gilbert's Survey, i. 452; Lysons, pp. 74. 50; Brydges's Collins, vi. 62.

Arms.—Ermine, a rose gules barbed and seeded proper. The ancient arms of the family were, according to Lysons, Vert, a bull-dog argent, with a chief containing the arms now used.

Coat of Arms.—Ermine, a red rose with thorns and seeds. According to Lysons, the family's original coat of arms was green, showcasing a silver bulldog, with the upper section displaying the arms currently in use.

Present Representative, Evelyn Boscawen, 6th Viscount Falmouth.

Present Representative, Evelyn Boscawen, 6th Viscount Falmouth.





Tremayne of Helligan, in the parish of St. Ewe.

arms_page036.jpg

Tremayne is in the parish of St. Martin, and here the ancestor of the family, Perys, lived in the reign of Edward III. and assumed the local name. This estate passed with the heiress of the elder branch of the family to the Trethurfes, and from them to the Reskymers, to whom it belonged in Leland's time. A grandson of the first Tremayne, having married the heiress of Trenchard, of Collacomb, in Devonshire, removed hither, where his descendants existed till the extinction of that line in 1808. The founder of the present family was Richard Tremayne, whose son purchased Helligan in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, and who is thus noticed by Carew in his Survey of this county. "At the adjoining St. Ive, dwelleth master Richard Tremayne, descended from a younger brother of Colocome House in Devon, who, being learned in the laws, is yet to learne, or at least to practise, how he may make other profit thereby, then by hoarding up treasure of gratitude in the mindful breasts of poor and rich, on whom he gratis bestoweth the fruits of his pains and knowledge."

Tremayne is located in the parish of St. Martin, where the family's ancestor, Perys, lived during the reign of Edward III and took on the local name. This estate passed through the heiress of the elder branch of the family to the Trethurfes, and then to the Reskymers, who owned it during Leland's time. A grandson of the first Tremayne, who married the heiress of Trenchard from Collacomb in Devonshire, moved here, and his descendants lived on until that line ended in 1808. The founder of the current family was Richard Tremayne, whose son bought Helligan during Queen Elizabeth’s reign, and he is mentioned by Carew in his Survey of this county. "At the nearby St. Ive lives Master Richard Tremayne, descended from a younger brother of Colocome House in Devon, who, being knowledgeable in the law, still needs to learn, or at least to practice, how to make a profit from it, other than stockpiling treasure of gratitude in the grateful hearts of both the poor and the rich, to whom he freely shares the benefits of his efforts and knowledge."

See Leland's Itin. iii. 25, fol. 9; Carew, 104 b; Gilbert's Survey, ii. 292; Lysons, pp. cxv. 96, 214; Prince's Worthies of Devon, 1st ed. 569.

See Leland's Itin. iii. 25, fol. 9; Carew, 104 b; Gilbert's Survey, ii. 292; Lysons, pp. cxv. 96, 214; Prince's Worthies of Devon, 1st ed. 569.

Arms.—Gules, three dexter arms conjoined at the shoulders and flexed in triangle or, fists proper.

Arms.—Red background, three right arms joined at the shoulders and arranged in a triangle, with gold fists.

Present Representative, John Tremayne, Esq.

Present Representative, John Tremayne, Esq.





Kendall of Pelyn, in the parish of Lanlivery.

arms_page037.jpg

A younger branch of an ancient Cornish family of which the principal line became extinct in the early part of the seventeenth century. They were formerly seated at Treworgy in Duloe, and are traced to Richard Kendall of Treworgy, Burgess for Launceston in the forty-third of Edward III. Pelyn has been for many generations the seat of this family, descended from Walter, third son of John Kendall of Treworgy, who married a daughter and coheir of Robert Holland, an illegitimate son of a Duke of Exeter. It has been remarked of this family, that they have perhaps sent more members to the British Senate than any other in the United Kingdom.

A younger branch of an ancient Cornish family, whose main line died out in the early seventeenth century. They used to live at Treworgy in Duloe and can be traced back to Richard Kendall of Treworgy, who was a Burgess for Launceston in the forty-third year of Edward III. Pelyn has been the family seat for many generations, descended from Walter, the third son of John Kendall of Treworgy, who married a daughter and co-heir of Robert Holland, an illegitimate son of a Duke of Exeter. It's been noted that this family may have sent more members to the British Senate than any other family in the United Kingdom.

See Carew, 132 c.; Gilbert's Survey, ii. 176; Lysons, pp. cviii. 178.

See Carew, 132 c.; Gilbert's Survey, ii. 176; Lysons, pp. cviii. 178.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three dolphins naiant embowed sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, with a chevron between three black dolphins swimming.

Present Representative, Nicholas Kendall, Esq. M.P. for East Cornwall.

Present Representative, Nicholas Kendall, Esq. M.P. for East Cornwall.





Wrey of Trebigh, in the parish of St. Ive, Baronet.

arms_page038a.jpg

An old Devonshire family, descended from Robert le Wrey, who lived in the second of Stephen (1136-7), and whose son was seated at Wrey, in the parish of Moreton-Hamstead, in that county. A match with the heiress of Killigrew removed the Wreys into Cornwall, and Trebigh became their principal house, until, by the marriage of Sir Chichester Wrey, the second Baronet, with one of the co-heiresses of Edward Bourchier, fourth Earl of Bath, they became possessed of the noble seat of Tawstock, in Devonshire, the present usual residence of the family.

An old family from Devonshire, descended from Robert le Wrey, who lived during the reign of Stephen (1136-7), and whose son settled at Wrey, in the parish of Moreton-Hamstead, in that county. A marriage with the heiress of Killigrew moved the Wreys to Cornwall, and Trebigh became their main residence until, through the marriage of Sir Chichester Wrey, the second Baronet, to one of the co-heiresses of Edward Bourchier, fourth Earl of Bath, they acquired the noble estate of Tawstock, in Devonshire, which is now the family's usual home.

See Carew, 117 a; Gilbert's Survey, i. 555; Lysons, lxxxix. 146; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 84; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, 567.

See Carew, 117 a; Gilbert's Survey, i. 555; Lysons, lxxxix. 146; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 84; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, 567.

Arms.—Sable, a fess between three pole-axes argent, helved gules.

Coat of Arms.—Black, with a stripe across featuring three silver pole-axes with red handles.

Present Representative, Sir Bourchier Palk Wrey, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Bourchier Palk Wrey, 8th Baronet.





Rashleigh of Menabilly.

arms_page038b.jpg

Rashleigh in the parish of Wemworthy, in Devonshire, gave name this ancient family, the elder line of which became extinct in the reign of Henry VII.

Rashleigh in the parish of Wemworthy, in Devonshire, named this ancient family, whose elder line became extinct during the reign of Henry VII.

John Rashleigh, a merchant of Fowey, was the first who settled in Cornwall, and was in fact the founder of the present family. He is thus mentioned by Carew, writing in 1602, "I may not passe in silence the commendable deserts of Master Rashleigh the elder, descended from a younger brother of an ancient house in Devon, for his industrious judgement and adventuring in trade of merchandize first opened a light and way to the townsmen newe thriveing, and left his sonne large wealth and possessions, who, with a dayly bettering his estate, converteth the same to hospitality, and other actions fitting a gentleman well affected to his God, Prince, and Country."

John Rashleigh, a merchant from Fowey, was the first to settle in Cornwall and is really the founder of the current family. Carew mentioned him in 1602, saying, "I can't go without acknowledging the noteworthy achievements of Master Rashleigh the elder, who came from a younger brother of an ancient family in Devon. His hardworking judgment and boldness in trade opened a path for the townspeople to thrive and left his son a significant wealth and property. His son, by continually improving his fortune, uses his resources for hospitality and other activities fitting for a gentleman who is devoted to his God, Prince, and Country."

See Carew, p. 136 a; Gilbert's Survey, ii. 244; Lysons, pp. cxiii. 316.

See Carew, p. 136 a; Gilbert's Survey, ii. 244; Lysons, pp. cxiii. 316.

Arms.—Sable, a cross or between, in the first quarter, a Cornish chough argent, beaked and legged gules, in the second a text T, in the third and fourth a crescent, all argent. The Cornish chough and crescents were added on removing into Cornwall; the elder branch bore only two text T's in chief with the cross S.

Coat of Arms.—Black, featuring a cross or, with a silver Cornish chough in the first quarter, which has a red beak and legs; a text T in the second quarter; and silver crescents in the third and fourth quarters. The Cornish chough and crescents were added when relocating to Cornwall; the earlier version only included two text T's at the top along with the black cross.

Present Representative, William Rashleigh, Esq.

Present Representative, William Rashleigh, Esq.





Glanville of Catchfrench, in the parish of St. German.

arms_page039.jpg

Descended from the Glanvilles of Halwell, in the parish of Whitchurch, in Devonshire, where they were settled about the year 1400. This branch is derived from a younger son of Serjeant Glanville, the son of Sir John Glanville, one of the Justices of the Common Pleas in the reign of Elizabeth. Catchfrench became the seat of the family in 1728.

Descended from the Glanvilles of Halwell, in the parish of Whitchurch, in Devon, where they settled around the year 1400. This branch comes from a younger son of Serjeant Glanville, the son of Sir John Glanville, who was one of the Justices of the Common Pleas during Elizabeth's reign. Catchfrench became the family's home in 1728.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, pp. 326 and 339; Gilbert's Survey, ii. 121; Lysons, pp. civ. 116.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, pp. 326 and 339; Gilbert's Survey, ii. 121; Lysons, pp. civ. 116.

Arms.—Azure, three saltiers or. Present Representative, Francis Glanville, Esq.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, with three diagonal crosses in gold. Current Representative: Francis Glanville, Esq.





CUMBERLAND.

Knightly.

Musgrave of Edenhall, Baronet 1611.

arms_page040.jpg

Originally seated at Musgrave in Westmerland, and traced to the time of King John, about the year 1204. After the marriage of Sir Thomas Musgrave, who died in 1469-70, with the coheiress of Stapleton of Edenhall, he removed to that manor, where is preserved the celebrated glass vessel called the Luck of Edenhall, well known from the Duke of Wharton's ballad:

Originally based at Musgrave in Westmerland, and dating back to the time of King John, around the year 1204. After Sir Thomas Musgrave married the coheiress of Stapleton of Edenhall, who passed away in 1469-70, he moved to that manor, where the famous glass vessel known as the Luck of Edenhall is kept, which is well known from the Duke of Wharton's ballad:

"God prosper long from being broke
The Luck of Edenhall."

See Lysons, ccix. where it is engraved.

See Lysons, ccix. where it is engraved.

Younger branches. The Musgraves of Hayton Castle, in this county, Baronet of Nova Scotia 1638; and the Musgraves of Tourin, in the county of Waterford, Baronet 1782.

Younger branches. The Musgraves of Hayton Castle, in this county, Baronet of Nova Scotia 1638; and the Musgraves of Tourin, in the county of Waterford, Baronet 1782.

See Lysons, lxiv. 100; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 74, iv. 354; and St. George's Visitation of Westmerland, printed 1853, p. 5, &c.

See Lysons, lxiv. 100; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 74, iv. 354; and St. George's Visitation of Westmerland, printed 1853, p. 5, &c.

Arms.—Azure, six annulets or.

Arms.—Blue, six golden rings.

Monsire de Musgrave bore this coat, as appears by the Roll of the reign of Edward III., and Thomas Musgrave in that of Richard II. (Rolls of those dates.)

Monsieur de Musgrave wore this coat, as shown in the Roll from the reign of Edward III, and Thomas Musgrave did the same in the time of Richard II. (Rolls from those dates.)

Present Representative, Sir George Musgrave, 10th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir George Musgrave, 10th Baronet.





Huddlestone of Hutton-John.

arms_page041.jpg

An ancient Northern family, said to be of Saxon descent, originally of Huddleston in Yorkshire, and afterwards of Millom Castle in this county, from an heiress of that name, where the elder line flourished till its extinction in 1745. Andrew, a younger son of John Huddleston of Millom, who lived in the reign of Henry VIII., married the heiress of Hutton of Hutton-John, and was the ancestor of the present family.

An old Northern family, believed to be of Saxon origin, originally from Huddleston in Yorkshire, and later from Millom Castle in this county through an heiress of that name, where the main branch thrived until it ended in 1745. Andrew, a younger son of John Huddleston of Millom, who lived during the reign of Henry VIII, married the heiress of Hutton of Hutton-John, and became the ancestor of the current family.

A younger branch of the Huddlestons were fixed in the county of Cambridge by a match with the illustrious House of Neville. Sir William Huddleston having married Isabel, fifth daughter of John, Marquess of Montecute, became possessed, on the partition of the Neville estates in 1496, of the manor of Sawston, still the inheritance of this line of the family.

A younger branch of the Huddlestons settled in Cambridge County through a marriage with the famous House of Neville. Sir William Huddleston married Isabel, the fifth daughter of John, Marquess of Montecute, and upon the division of the Neville estates in 1496, he acquired the manor of Sawston, which remains the inheritance of this branch of the family.

For Sir John Huddleston, so much trusted by Queen Mary, see Fuller's Worthies, 1st ed. p. 168.

For Sir John Huddleston, who was greatly trusted by Queen Mary, see Fuller's Worthies, 1st ed. p. 168.

John Huddleston, the priest instrumental in saving the life of Charles II, and the same who attended him on his deathbed, was second son of Andrew Huddleston, of Hutton-John. This family afterwards became Protestants, and were active promoters of the Revolution.

John Huddleston, the priest who played a key role in saving Charles II's life and who was also by his side on his deathbed, was the second son of Andrew Huddleston from Hutton-John. This family later converted to Protestantism and became active supporters of the Revolution.

For a curious account of Sawston and the Huddlestons, see Gent. Mag. for 1815, pt. 2. pp. 25 and 120; Lysons's Cambridgeshire, p. 248, and Cumberland, p. lxxiv. and 107; also Banks's Stemmata Anglicana, "Barones Rejecti," and the Visitation of Cambridgeshire 1619, fol. 1840, p. 19.

For an interesting overview of Sawston and the Huddlestons, check out Gent. Mag. for 1815, pt. 2. pp. 25 and 120; Lysons's Cambridgeshire, p. 248, and Cumberland, p. lxxiv. and 107; also Banks's Stemmata Anglicana, "Barones Rejecti," and the Visitation of Cambridgeshire 1619, fol. 1840, p. 19.

Arms.—Gules, fretty argent. This coat was borne by Sir John de Hodelestone in the reign of Edward II., Sir Adam the same, with a border indented or, Sir Richard with a label azure, Sir Richard, the nephew, with a label or. (Roll of the reign of Edw. II. co. York.)

Coat of Arms.—Red, with silver frets. This coat was owned by Sir John de Hodelestone during the reign of Edward II, Sir Adam had the same coat with a notched gold border, Sir Richard had a blue label, and Sir Richard, the nephew, had a gold label. (Roll from the reign of Edw. II, co. York.)

Present Representative, W. Huddleston, Esq.

Present Rep, W. Huddleston, Esq.





Gentle.

Irton of Irton.

arms_page042.jpg

A family of very great antiquity, and resident at Irton, on the river Irt, from whence the name is derived, as early as the reign of Henry I. The Manor of Irton has belonged also to the ancestors of Mr. Irton almost from the time of the Conquest.

A family with a long history, living in Irton by the river Irt, which is where the name comes from, since at least the time of Henry I. The Manor of Irton has also been in the family of Mr. Irton nearly since the Conquest.

See Lysons, lxxv. 119.

See Lysons, lxxv. 119.

Arms.—Argent, a fess sable, in chief three mullets gules.

Arms.—Silver background with a black stripe in the middle and three red stars above it.

Present Representative, Samuel Irton, Esq. late M.P. for the Western Division of Cumberland.

Present Representative, Samuel Irton, Esq., former Member of Parliament for the Western Division of Cumberland.





Briscoe of Crofton, in the parish of Thursby, Baronet 1782.

arms_page043a.jpg

Originally of Briscoe near Carlisle, where the family were seated three generations before the reign of Edward I. Crofton, which came by an heiress of that name, has been since the year 1390 the residence of the Briscoe family.

Originally from Briscoe near Carlisle, where the family had settled three generations before Edward I's reign. Crofton, which was inherited through an heiress of that name, has been the home of the Briscoe family since 1390.

See Lysons, lxvi. 159.

See Lysons, lxvi. 159.

Arms.—Argent, three greyhounds currant sable.

Arms.—Silver, three black greyhounds.

In Clutterbuck's Hertfordshire, i. 158, there is a pedigree of a younger branch of this family, who were seated at Aldenham, in that county, previous to 1736.

In Clutterbuck's Hertfordshire, i. 158, there is a family tree of a younger branch of this family, who lived at Aldenham in that county before 1736.

Present Representative, Sir Robert Briscoe, 3rd Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Robert Briscoe, 3rd Baronet.





Dykes of Dovenby, in the parish of Bridekirk.

arms_page043b.jpg

The name, originally "Del Dykes," is derived from the two lines of Roman wall in "Burgh," from whence the family at a remote period originated; Ramerus de Dikes, who lived before the reign of Henry II., is the first supposed ancestor. The pedigree is regularly traced three generations before the 50th of Edward III. to the present time. In the Wars of the Roses the Dykes's, like most other families in the Northern counties, were Lancastrian; and in the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century, devoted Royalists, and sufferers for their allegiance to the Crown. Dovenby, formerly the seat of the Lamplughs, came by marriage in the present century. The Manor of Warthole or Wardhill, purchased in the reign of Henry VI., and still in the family, was the former residence. Waverton, acquired in the 10th of Edward II., exchanged in 1619, and Distington, acquired in the 7th of Richard II., and afterwards alienated, were more ancient possessions.

The name, originally "Del Dykes," comes from the two lines of Roman wall in "Burgh," where the family originally came from a long time ago; Ramerus de Dikes, who lived before Henry II.'s reign, is considered the first ancestor. The family lineage is regularly traced back three generations before the 50th year of Edward III. to the present day. During the Wars of the Roses, the Dykes family, like many others in the Northern counties, supported the Lancastrians; and in the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century, they were loyal Royalists who suffered for their loyalty to the Crown. Dovenby, which was formerly the seat of the Lamplughs, came into the family by marriage in this century. The Manor of Warthole or Wardhill, purchased during Henry VI.'s reign, is still in the family and was their previous home. Waverton, acquired in the 10th year of Edward II., was exchanged in 1619, and Distington, acquired in the 7th year of Richard II., was later sold, were older possessions.

See Lysons, lxxii. 36; Hutchinson's Cumberland, ii. 98 and note; Burn's Cumberland, ii. 49, and i. 157. I am obliged to the present Representative for additions to this account.

See Lysons, lxxii. 36; Hutchinson's Cumberland, ii. 98 and note; Burn's Cumberland, ii. 49, and i. 157. I am grateful to the current Representative for the additional information in this account.

Arms.—Or, three cinquefoils sable. Monsr. Willm. de Dyks bore, Argent, a fess vaire or and gules, between three water bougets sable, as appears by the Roll of the reign of Richard II.

Coat of Arms.—Gold, featuring three black cinquefoils. Mr. William de Dyks had, Silver, a checkered band of gold and red, between three black water buckets, as indicated in the Roll from the reign of Richard II.

Present Representative, Frecheville-Lawson Ballantine-Dykes, Esq.

Present Representative, Frecheville-Lawson Ballantine-Dykes, Esq.





DERBYSHIRE.

Knightly.

Gresley of Drakelow, Baronet 1611.

arms_page045.jpg

"In point of stationary antiquity hardly any families in the kingdom can compare with the Gresleys," wrote the Topographer in 1789. In this county certainly none can claim precedence to the house of Drakelow; descended from Nigel, mentioned in Domesday, called de Stafford, and said to have been a younger son of Roger de Toni, standard-bearer in Normandy, it was very soon after the Conquest established in Derbyshire, first at Gresley, and immediately afterwards at Drakelow, in the same parish. The present is a younger branch, seated at Nether Seale, in Leicestershire, at the beginning of the eighteenth century.

"In terms of history, hardly any families in the kingdom can compare to the Gresleys," wrote the Topographer in 1789. In this county, none can claim precedence over the house of Drakelow; descended from Nigel, mentioned in the Domesday Book, called de Stafford, and believed to be a younger son of Roger de Toni, who was a standard-bearer in Normandy. Soon after the Conquest, it was established in Derbyshire, first at Gresley, and then immediately afterwards at Drakelow, in the same parish. The current branch is seated at Nether Seale, in Leicestershire, since the beginning of the eighteenth century.

See Leland's Itinerary in Coll. Topog. et Genealog. iii. 339; Nichols's History of Leicestershire, iii. pt. 2, p. 1009*; the Topographer, i. 432, 455, 474; Lysons, lxiii.; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 121; and Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed 1844, p. 208.

See Leland's Itinerary in Coll. Topog. et Genealog. iii. 339; Nichols's History of Leicestershire, iii. pt. 2, p. 1009*; the Topographer, i. 432, 455, 474; Lysons, lxiii.; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 121; and Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed 1844, p. 208.

Arms.—Vaire, ermine and gules. Allusive no doubt to the Ferrers,' under whom Drakelow was held anno 1200, by the service of a bow, quiver, and 12 arrows. The same coat was borne by Sir Geffray de Greseley in the reign of Edward I., and by Sir Peres de Gresle, in the reign of Edward II. (Rolls.) John de Greseley bore simply, Vair, argent and gules. (Roll Ric. II.)

Coat of Arms.—Vaire, ermine and gules. This probably refers to the Ferrers, who held Drakelow in 1200, depicted with a bow, quiver, and 12 arrows. The same coat was used by Sir Geffray de Greseley during Edward I's reign, and by Sir Peres de Gresle during Edward II's reign. (Rolls.) John de Greseley used Vair, argent and gules. (Roll Ric. II.)

Present Representative, Sir Thomas Gresley, 10th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas Gresley, 10th Baronet.





Fitzherbert of Norbury.

arms_page046.jpg

This ancient Norman house was seated at Norbury, by the grant of the Prior of Tutbury, in 1125, 25 Henry I. The principal male line becoming extinct in 1649, the succession went to a younger branch descended from William, third son of the celebrated Sir Anthony Fitzherbert the judge, who had seated themselves at Swinnerton, in Staffordshire, still the residence of this family.

This old Norman house was located in Norbury, granted by the Prior of Tutbury in 1125, during the reign of Henry I. The main male line died out in 1649, and the succession passed to a younger branch descended from William, the third son of the famous Sir Anthony Fitzherbert the judge, who established themselves in Swinnerton, Staffordshire, which is still the home of this family.

Younger branch. Fitzherbert of Tissington, Baronet 1783, descended from Nicholas, younger son of John Fitzherbert of Somersall. See Topographer for a curious account of the pedigree and monuments, ii. 225, and Lysons, 217; for Fitzherbert of Tissington, Topographer and Genealogist, i. 362; Gent. Mag. lxvii. p. 645; Topographer, iii. 57; and Brydges's Collins, ix. 156.

Younger branch. Fitzherbert of Tissington, Baronet 1783, is descended from Nicholas, the younger son of John Fitzherbert of Somersall. See Topographer for an interesting account of the family lineage and monuments, ii. 225, and Lysons, 217; for Fitzherbert of Tissington, Topographer and Genealogist, i. 362; Gent. Mag. lxvii. p. 645; Topographer, iii. 57; and Brydges's Collins, ix. 156.

Arms.—Argent, a chief vaire or and gules, over all a bend sable. This coat is also complimentary to Ferrers. The Tissington Fitzherberts have assumed a different coat, viz. Gules, three lions rampant or, from a fanciful notion of their descent from Henry Fitzherbert, Lord Chamberlain 5th Stephen, ancestor of the Herberts of Dean. The lions were assumed as early as 1569. See the Visitation of Derbyshire.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a chief of alternating blue and red, and a black diagonal stripe across it. This coat also matches that of Ferrers. The Tissington Fitzherberts have taken on a different coat, namely Red, featuring three golden lions standing on their hind legs, based on an imaginative belief in their descent from Henry Fitzherbert, Lord Chamberlain to the 5th Stephen, who is an ancestor of the Herberts of Dean. The lions were adopted as early as 1569. See the Visitation of Derbyshire.

Present Representative, Basil Fitzherbert, Esq.

Present Rep, Basil Fitzherbert, Esq.





Curzon of Kedleston, Baron Scarsdale 1761, Baronet 1641.

arms_page047.jpg

This ancient family was seated at Kedleston as early as the reign of Henry I. It is said to be of Breton origin, and descended from Geraline, a great benefactor to the Abbey of Abingdon, in Berkshire, in which county the Curzons held lands soon after the Conquest.

This old family settled at Kedleston as early as the rule of Henry I. They are believed to be of Breton origin and descended from Geraline, a major supporter of the Abbey of Abingdon in Berkshire, where the Curzons owned land shortly after the Conquest.

Younger branches. Curzon Earl Howe 1821; Curzon of Parham, Sussex.

Younger branches: Curzon Earl Howe 1821; Curzon of Parham, Sussex.

Extinct branches. Curzon of Croxall and Water-Perry, co. Oxford, and of Letheringset, Norfolk.

Extinct branches: Curzon of Croxall and Water-Perry, Oxfordshire, and of Letheringset, Norfolk.

See Lysons, lii.; Brydges's Collins, vii. 294; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 243.

See Lysons, lii.; Brydges's Collins, vii. 294; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 243.

Arms.—Argent, a bend sable, charged with three popinjays or, collared gules, borne by Monsr. Roger Curson in the reign of Richard II. Sir John Cursoun bore, Argent, a bend gules bezantée, in that of Edward II. (Rolls.) According to Burton's Collections quoted by Wotton, the more ancient coat was, Vair, or and gules, a border sable charged with popinjays argent: this was in compliment to William Earl Ferrers and Derby, who had granted to Stephen Curson the manor of Fauld, co. Stafford.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a black diagonal stripe, featuring three gold parrots with red collars, carried by Monsr. Roger Curson during the reign of Richard II. Sir John Cursoun displayed Silver background with a red diagonal stripe decorated with gold coins, during the era of Edward II. (Rolls.) According to Burton's Collections cited by Wotton, the older coat was Vair, gold and red, with a black border featuring silver parrots: this was in honor of William Earl Ferrers and Derby, who had granted Stephen Curson the manor of Fauld, county Stafford.

Present Representative, the Rev. Alfred Nathaniel Holden Curzon, 4th Baron Scarsdale.

Present Representative, the Rev. Alfred Nathaniel Holden Curzon, 4th Baron Scarsdale.





Vernon of Sudbury, Baron Vernon 1762.

arms_page048.jpg

The Vernons were originally of Cheshire, and Barons of Shipbrooke, but became connected with Derbyshire by the heiress of Avenell's marriage with Richard Vernon in the 12th century; their son died s.p.m. leaving a daughter and heiress married to Gilbert le Francis, whose son Richard took the name of Vernon, seated himself at Haddon Hall in this county, and was the ancestor of the different branches of the House of Vernon. The Sudbury Vernons settled there in the reign of Henry VIII., and, by the extinction of the other lines, became in the end the chief of the family. Few houses have been more connected together by intermarriage than the Vernons.

The Vernons originally came from Cheshire and were Barons of Shipbrooke, but they became linked to Derbyshire through the marriage of the heiress Avenell to Richard Vernon in the 12th century. Their son died without a male heir, leaving a daughter and heiress who married Gilbert le Francis. Their son Richard adopted the name Vernon, moved to Haddon Hall in this county, and became the ancestor of the various branches of the House of Vernon. The Sudbury Vernons established themselves there during the reign of Henry VIII, and with the other lines dying out, they eventually became the leading branch of the family. Few families have been more intertwined through intermarriage than the Vernons.

Younger branches. The Vernon-Harcourts, now of Nuneham Courteney, co. Oxon; the Vernons of Hilton, Staffordshire; and the Vernon-Wentworths, of Wentworth Castle, Yorkshire.

Younger branches. The Vernon-Harcourts, now from Nuneham Courteney, Oxon; the Vernons from Hilton, Staffordshire; and the Vernon-Wentworths, from Wentworth Castle, Yorkshire.

See Lysons, liii.; Brydges's Collins, vii. 396; Topographer, ii. 217, for inscriptions to the Vernons at Sudbury, which came from the heiress of Montgomery: for Vernon of Houndhill, in the parish of Henbury, and of Harleston in Clifton Camville, see Shaw's Staffordshire, i. 87, 399, and the Topographer, ii. 11: and for Vernon of Tonge, Topographer, iii. 109, and Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. ii. p. 191.

See Lysons, liii.; Brydges's Collins, vii. 396; Topographer, ii. 217, for inscriptions to the Vernons at Sudbury, which came from the heiress of Montgomery: for Vernon of Houndhill, in the parish of Henbury, and of Harleston in Clifton Camville, see Shaw's Staffordshire, i. 87, 399, and the Topographer, ii. 11: and for Vernon of Tonge, Topographer, iii. 109, and Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. ii. p. 191.

Arms.—Argent, fretty sable. This coat, with a quarter gules, was borne by Monsr. Richard Vernon in the reign of Richard II. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Silver, interlaced black. This coat, featuring a red quarter, was held by Mr. Richard Vernon during the reign of Richard II. (Roll.)

Present Representative, George John Warren, 5th Baron Vernon.

Present Representative, George John Warren, 5th Baron Vernon.





Pole of Radborne.

arms_page049a.jpg

Originally from Newborough in Staffordshire, but from the fourteenth century established, through female descent, first at Hartington, and afterwards at Wakebridge, in this county. Radborne was inherited from the Chandos's, through the Lawtons, also in the fourteenth century. It came to the Chandos family from an heiress of Ferrers or "Fitz-Walkelin."

Originally from Newborough in Staffordshire, but since the fourteenth century established, through female lineage, first at Hartington, and later at Wakebridge, in this county. Radborne was passed down from the Chandos family through the Lawtons, also in the fourteenth century. It came to the Chandos family from an heiress of Ferrers or "Fitz-Walkelin."

See Leland's Itinerary, vol. viii. fol. 70 a, and vol. iv. fol. 6; the Topographer, i. 280; Topographer and Genealogist, i. 176; and Lysons, xciv.

See Leland's Itinerary, vol. viii. fol. 70 a, and vol. iv. fol. 6; the Topographer, i. 280; Topographer and Genealogist, i. 176; and Lysons, xciv.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three crescents gules.

Arms.—Silver background with a chevron and three red crescents.

Present Representative, Edward Sacheverell Chandos Pole, Esq.

Present Representative, Edward Sacheverell Chandos Pole, Esq.





Cavendish of Hardwick, Duke of Devonshire 1694, Earl 1618, Baron 1605.

arms_page049b.jpg

This family was originally from Cavendish Overhall, near Clare, in Suffolk, and is descended from Sir John Cavendish, who in the reign of Edward III. was Chief Justice of the King's Bench. It was John, a younger son of the Judge, who killed Wat Tyler, and from him the family are descended. But it was Sir William Cavendish, younger brother of George Cavendish, who had been Gentleman Usher to Wolsey, who may be called the real founder of the Cavendishes, by the great share of abbey lands which he obtained at the Dissolution of Monasteries, "and afterwards," adds Brydges, "by the abilities, rapacity, and good fortune of Elizabeth, his widow," the celebrated Countess of Shrewsbury. The Cavendishes first settled in Derbyshire by the marriage of this Sir William with "Bess of Hardwick," in 1544.

This family originated from from Cavendish Overhall, near Clare, in Suffolk, and is descended from Sir John Cavendish, who was the Chief Justice of the King's Bench during the reign of Edward III. It was John, a younger son of the Judge, who killed Wat Tyler, and the family descends from him. However, it was Sir William Cavendish, the younger brother of George Cavendish, who had been the Gentleman Usher to Wolsey, who can be considered the real founder of the Cavendishes due to the significant amount of abbey lands he acquired during the Dissolution of Monasteries, “and afterwards,” adds Brydges, “by the skills, greed, and good fortune of Elizabeth, his widow,” the famous Countess of Shrewsbury. The Cavendishes first settled in Derbyshire when this Sir William married "Bess of Hardwick" in 1544.

See Topographer, iii. 306; Brydges's Collins, i. 302; Collins's Noble Families.

See Topographer, iii. 306; Brydges's Collins, i. 302; Collins's Noble Families.

Arms.—Sable, three buck's heads cabossed argent, attired or. Monsr. Andrew Cavendysh of this family bore, Sable, three crosses botonnée fitchée or, 2 and 1. (Roll Ric. II.)

Arms.—Black, featuring three silver buck's heads facing forward, with gold antlers. Mr. Andrew Cavendysh from this family had, Black, with three gold crosses with fitché ends, arranged 2 and 1. (Roll Ric. II.)

Present Representative, William Cavendish, 7th Duke of Devonshire, and 2nd Earl of Burlington.

Present Representative, William Cavendish, 7th Duke of Devonshire, and 2nd Earl of Burlington.





Harpur of Calke, Baronet 1626 (called Crewe).

arms_page050.jpg

This family was originally of Chesterton in Warwickshire, where it is traced as early as the reigns of Henry I. and II.

This family originally came from Chesterton in Warwickshire, where its history can be traced back to the reigns of Henry I and II.

In right of Elianor, daughter and heir to William Grober, descended from Richard de Rushall, of Rushall, in Staffordshire, the Harpurs were afterwards seated at that place, but had no connection with Derbyshire till the reign of Elizabeth. Calke was purchased by Henry Harpur, Esq. in 1621.

In the right of Elianor, the daughter and heir of William Grober, who was a descendant of Richard de Rushall from Rushall in Staffordshire, the Harpurs later settled there, but they had no ties to Derbyshire until the reign of Elizabeth. Calke was bought by Henry Harpur, Esq. in 1621.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed, vol. i. 478; Shaw's History of Staffordshire, ii. 69; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 1; Lysons, lxiii.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed, vol. i. 478; Shaw's History of Staffordshire, ii. 69; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 1; Lysons, lxiii.

Arms.—Argent, a lion rampant within a border engrailed sable. This was the coat of Rushall; the arms of Harpur were a plain cross.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, a lion standing on one hind leg inside a wavy black border. This was the coat of Rushall; the arms of Harpur featured a plain cross.

Present Representative, Sir John Harpur Crewe, 9th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Harpur Crewe, 9th Baronet.





Burdett of Foremark, Baronet 1618.

arms_page051.jpg

The pedigree begins with Hugo de Burdet, who came into England with William I., and was lord of the manor of Loseby, in Leicestershire, in 1066. Arrow, in the county of Warwick, which came from the heiress of Camvile the 9th of Edward II., was long the seat of the Burdetts, but they had long before, as Dugdale shows, been connected by property with that county, William Burdett having founded the cell of Ancote, near Sekindon, in the fifth of Henry II. The manor of Arrow, and many other estates of this family, carried by an heiress to the Conways in the reign of Henry VII., became the fruitful cause of many lawsuits, which were not finally settled till the end of the reign of Henry VIII. See Dugdale for the curious details. Foremark was inherited from the heiress of Francis in 1602.

The family tree starts with Hugo de Burdet, who came to England with William I and was the lord of the manor of Loseby in Leicestershire in 1066. Arrow, located in Warwickshire, which passed down from the heiress of Camvile during the reign of Edward II, was the main home of the Burdetts. However, as Dugdale points out, they had long been linked to properties in that county, with William Burdett establishing the cell of Ancote, near Sekindon, during the fifth year of Henry II's reign. The manor of Arrow and several other estates belonging to this family were inherited by the Conways during the reign of Henry VII, leading to numerous lawsuits that weren’t resolved until the end of Henry VIII's reign. For more intriguing details, see Dugdale. Foremark was inherited from the heiress of Francis in 1602.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd edit. ii. 847; Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, 462; Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. pt. 1. 351; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 327; and Lysons.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed. ii. 847; Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, 462; Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. pt. 1. 351; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 327; and Lysons.

Arms.—Azure, two bars or. Sir William Burdett bore this coat in the reign of Edward II. Sir Robert the same, in the upper bar three martlets gules. (Roll Edw. II. under Leicestershire.) Sir Richard the same, with an orle of martlets gules. (Roll E. III.) Monsr, John Burdet the same, each bar charged with three martlets gules. (Roll Richard II.)

Arms.—Blue, with two gold bars. Sir William Burdett used this coat during the reign of Edward II. Sir Robert had the same, with three red martlets on the upper bar. (Roll Edw. II. under Leicestershire.) Sir Richard used the same design, with an outline of red martlets. (Roll E. III.) Mr. John Burdet also had the same, each bar featuring three red martlets. (Roll Richard II.)

Present Representative, Sir Robert Burdett, 6th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Robert Burdett, 6th Baronet.





Cave of Stretton, Baronet 1641.

arms_page052.jpg

A family of great antiquity, which can be traced to the Conquest; originally of South and North Cave in Yorkshire. In the fifteenth century they removed into Northamptonshire and Leicestershire, and were long of Stanford, in the former county. The elder line of the Caves becoming extinct in 1810, the Baronetcy devolved on a younger branch, descended in the female line from the Brownes of Stretton, and from hence their connection with Derbyshire.

A family with a long history, tracing back to the Conquest; originally from South and North Cave in Yorkshire. In the 15th century, they moved to Northamptonshire and Leicestershire, and were long associated with Stanford in the former county. The older branch of the Caves became extinct in 1810, and the Baronetcy passed to a younger branch, which descended through the female line from the Brownes of Stretton, linking them to Derbyshire.

See Nichols's History of Leicestershire, vol. iv. part i. 350, for a curious account of this family, and for their monuments in Stanford Church, (the earliest of which is that for John Cave, who died in 1471;) Pedigree at p. 371; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 164; Lysons, xviii.

See Nichols's History of Leicestershire, vol. iv. part i. 350, for an interesting account of this family and their monuments in Stanford Church, (the earliest of which is for John Cave, who died in 1471); Pedigree at p. 371; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 164; Lysons, xviii.

Arms.—Azure, fretty argent. This coat was borne by "Monsire de Cave;" see the Roll of Arms of the reign of Edward III.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, with silver netting. This coat was worn by "Monsire de Cave;" refer to the Roll of Arms from the reign of Edward III.

Present Representative, Sir Mylles Cave-Browne-Cave, 11th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Mylles Cave-Browne-Cave, 11th Baronet.





Colvile of Lullington.

arms_page053.jpg

This is an ancient Suffolk and Cambridgeshire family, and can be traced to the time of Henry I. The Colviles, Barons of Culross, in Scotland, are descended from a younger brother of the second progenitor of the family.

This is an old family from Suffolk and Cambridgeshire, dating back to the time of Henry I. The Colviles, Barons of Culross in Scotland, are descendants of a younger brother of the family's second ancestor.

The manor of Newton-Colvile, acquired by the marriage of Sir Roger Colvile of Carleton Colvile in Suffolk, called "The Rapacious Knight," with the heiress of De Marisco, and held under the Bishop of Ely, continued in the Colviles from a period extending nearly from the Conquest to the year 1792, when it was sold, and the representative of this family, Sir Charles Colvile, settled in Derbyshire in consequence of his marriage with Miss Bonnel of Duffield. The head of the family was on the Royalist side in the reign of Charles I., and one of the intended Knights of the Royal Oak.

The manor of Newton-Colvile was acquired when Sir Roger Colvile of Carleton Colvile in Suffolk, known as "The Rapacious Knight," married the heiress of De Marisco. It was held under the Bishop of Ely and remained with the Colvile family from the time of the Conquest until 1792, when it was sold. The family representative, Sir Charles Colvile, moved to Derbyshire after marrying Miss Bonnel of Duffield. The head of the family supported the Royalist cause during Charles I's reign and was one of the intended Knights of the Royal Oak.

See Lysons's Cambridgeshire, 242; Blomefield's Norfolk; and Watson's History of Wisbeach.

See Lysons's Cambridgeshire, 242; Blomefield's Norfolk; and Watson's History of Wisbeach.

Arms.—Azure, a lion rampant or, a label of five points gules. This coat, with the lion argent, was borne by Sir Geoffry de Colville in the reign of Edward II., and without the label by Monsr. John Colvyle in that of Richard II. (Rolls of Arms of the dates.) Sir Roger de Colvile bore the present coat with a label of three points only, in 1240; as appears by his seal to a deed of that date.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, featuring a gold lion standing on one hind leg, with a red label of five points. This shield, displaying the silver lion, was used by Sir Geoffry de Colville during the reign of Edward II, and without the label by Monsr. John Colvyle in the time of Richard II. (Rolls of Arms from those periods.) Sir Roger de Colvile used the current shield with only a three-point label in 1240, as indicated by his seal on a document from that year.

Present Representative, Charles R. Colvile, Esq. M.P. for South Derbyshire.

Present Representative, Charles R. Colvile, Esq. M.P. for South Derbyshire.





Gentle.

Coke of Trusley.

arms_page054a.jpg

This is a younger branch of the old house of the Cokes of Trusley, a family of considerable antiquity. The elder line became extinct in 1718. The present family are descended from the Cokes of Suckley in Worcestershire. The Cokes were originally of Staffordshire, but settled in Derbyshire in consequence of a match with one of the coheiresses of Odingsells of Trusley, in the middle of the fifteenth century.

This is a younger branch of the old Cokes family from Trusley, which has a long history. The older line died out in 1718. The current family comes from the Cokes of Suckley in Worcestershire. The Cokes originally hailed from Staffordshire but moved to Derbyshire due to a marriage with one of the coheiresses of the Odingsells family of Trusley in the mid-fifteenth century.

There is a younger branch of this family at Lower Moor, in Herefordshire. The Cokes of Melbourn were also a younger branch, from whom the Lambs, Viscounts Melbourne, were descended.

There is a younger branch of this family in Lower Moor, Herefordshire. The Cokes of Melbourn were also a younger branch, from which the Lambs, Viscounts Melbourne, are descended.

See Lysons, lxxxi.

See Lysons, 81.

Arms.—Gules, three crescents and a canton or.

Coat of Arms.—Red background with three crescents and a gold rectangle in the corner.

Present Representative, Edward Thomas Coke, Esq.

Present Representative, Edward Thomas Coke, Esq.





Thornhill of Stanton, in the Parish of Youlgrave.

arms_page054b.jpg

Descended from the Thornhills of Thornhill in the Peak, where they were seated as early as the seventh of Edward I. Stanton was inherited from an heiress of Bache in 1697.

Descended from the Thornhills of Thornhill in the Peak, where they had been established as early as the reign of Edward I in the 7th century. Stanton was passed down from an heiress of Bache in 1697.

See Lysons, xcvii.

See Lysons, 97.

ARMS, confirmed in 1734.—Gules, two bars gemelles and a chief argent, thereon a mascle sable. This coat, without the mascle, was borne by M. Bryan de Thornhill in the reign of Edward III. (Roll.)

ARMS, confirmed in 1734.—Red, two horizontal bars and a silver chief, with a black mascle on it. This coat, without the mascle, was used by M. Bryan de Thornhill during the reign of Edward III. (Roll.)

Present Representative, William Pole Thornhill, Esq. late M.P. for North Derbyshire.

Present Representative, William Pole Thornhill, Esq., former M.P. for North Derbyshire.





Abney of Measham.

arms_page055.jpg

This is a younger branch of a family who were seated at Willersley, by a match with the heiress of Ingwardby at the beginning of the fifteenth century. Willersley was the property of the late Sir Charles Abney Hastings by female descent. Measham is a purchase of about a century.

This is a younger branch of a family that settled at Willersley after a marriage with the heiress of Ingwardby in the early fifteenth century. Willersley was owned by the late Sir Charles Abney Hastings through female lineage. Measham is a property they acquired around a century ago.

See Lysons, cxii.

See Lysons, cxii.

Arms.—Or, on a chief gules a lion passant argent. Lysons however gives, Argent, on a cross sable five bezants.

Coat of Arms.—Gold background with a red upper portion that has a silver lion walking. However, Lysons notes Silver background with a black cross and five bezants.

Present Representative, William Wotton-Abney, Esq.

Current Representative, William Wotton-Abney, Esq.





DEVONSHIRE.

Knightly.

Fulford of Fulford, in the parish of Dunsford.

arms_page056a.jpg

There is every reason to believe that the ancestors of this venerable family have resided at Fulford from the time of the Conquest. Three knights of the house distinguished themselves in the wars of the Holy Land. William de Fulford, who held Fulford in the reign of Richard I., is the first ascertained ancestor. Sir Baldwin Fulford, a leading Lancastrian, was beheaded at Bristol in 1461.

There’s every reason to think that the ancestors of this respected family have lived at Fulford since the time of the Conquest. Three knights from this family made their mark in the wars of the Holy Land. William de Fulford, who held Fulford during the reign of Richard I, is the first confirmed ancestor. Sir Baldwin Fulford, a prominent Lancastrian, was executed in Bristol in 1461.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1701, p. 298, for description of Fulford; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 612; Lysons, cxlv. 171.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1701, p. 298, for description of Fulford; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 612; Lysons, cxlv. 171.

Arms.—Gules, a chevron argent.

Arms.—Red, a silver chevron.

Present Representative, Baldwin Fulford, Esq.

Presenting Rep, Baldwin Fulford, Esq.





Courtenay of Powderham Castle, Earl of Devon 1553, restored 1831.

arms_page056b.jpg

This illustrious house is descended from Reginald de Courtenay, who came over to England with Henry II. A.D. 1151, and, having married the daughter and heiress of the hereditary sheriff of Devonshire, became immediately connected with this county. The Earldom of Devon was first conferred on the Courtenays in 1335, by reason of their descent from William de Redvers, Earl of Devon, The Powderham branch springs from Sir Philip, sixth son of Hugh second Earl of Devon.

This prominent family descends from Reginald de Courtenay, who came to England with Henry II in 1151. After marrying the daughter and heiress of the hereditary sheriff of Devonshire, he became closely linked to this county. The Earldom of Devon was first granted to the Courtenays in 1335, due to their lineage from William de Redvers, Earl of Devon. The Powderham branch originates from Sir Philip, the sixth son of Hugh, the second Earl of Devon.

See Brydges's Collins, vi. 214; Lysons, lxxxvii.; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, 570, &c.; Journal of Arch. Institute, x. 52; and Sir Harris Nicolas's Earldom of Devon.

See Brydges's Collins, vi. 214; Lysons, lxxxvii.; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, 570, &c.; Journal of Arch. Institute, x. 52; and Sir Harris Nicolas's Earldom of Devon.

Arms.—Or, three torteauxes.

Arms.—Or, three red circles.

This coat, with a bend azure, was borne by Sir Philip de Courtenay in the reign of Edward II. (Roll.) And the same, with a label azure, by Hugh de Courtenay in 1300. See the Roll of Carlaverock, and Sir Harris Nicolas's notes, p. 193. This label was, he remarks, charged by respective branches of the family with mitres, crescents, lozenges, annulets, fleurs-de-lis, guttees, and plates, and with a bend over all. See also Willement's Heraldic Notices in Canterbury Cathedral.

This coat, with a blue stripe, was carried by Sir Philip de Courtenay during the reign of Edward II. (Roll.) The same coat, with a blue label, was used by Hugh de Courtenay in 1300. Refer to the Roll of Carlaverock and Sir Harris Nicolas's notes, p. 193. He notes that this label was marked by different branches of the family with mitres, crescents, lozenges, rings, fleurs-de-lis, drops, and plates, along with a stripe across everything. See also Willement's Heraldic Notices in Canterbury Cathedral.

Present Representative, William Reginald Courtenay, 11th Earl of Devon.

Present Representative, William Reginald Courtenay, 11th Earl of Devon.





Edgcumbe of Edgcumbe, in the parish of Milton Abbot's.

arms_page057.jpg

Richard Edgcumbe was Lord of Edgcumbe in 1292, and was the direct ancestor of this venerable family, the present representative being twentieth in lineal descent from this first Richard.

Richard Edgcumbe was Lord of Edgcumbe in 1292 and was the direct ancestor of this respected family, with the current representative being the twentieth in line of descent from this first Richard.

In the reign of Edward III. William Edgcumbe, second son of the house of Edgcumbe, having married the heiress of Cotehele, in the parish of Calstock, removed into Cornwall, and was the ancestor of the Edgcumbes of Cotehele and Mount Edgcumbe, Earls of Mount Edgcumbe (1789).

In the time of Edward III, William Edgcumbe, the second son of the Edgcumbe family, married the heiress of Cotehele in the parish of Calstock. He moved to Cornwall and became the ancestor of the Edgcumbes of Cotehele and Mount Edgcumbe, Earls of Mount Edgcumbe (1789).

Another younger branch was of Brompton, or Brampton, in Kent.

Another younger branch was of Brompton, or Brampton, in Kent.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1701, p. 281; Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, 4to. 1820, vol. i. p. 444; Carew's Cornwall, 1st ed., p. 99 b and 114 a; Brydges's Collins, v. 306; and Lysons's Cornwall, lxxiii. 212, 53.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1701, p. 281; Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, 4to. 1820, vol. i. p. 444; Carew's Cornwall, 1st ed., p. 99 b and 114 a; Brydges's Collins, v. 306; and Lysons's Cornwall, lxxiii. 212, 53.

Arms.—Gules, on a bend ermine cotised or three boar's heads couped argent.

Coat of Arms.—Red background with a black diagonal stripe edged in gold, featuring three silver boar's heads cut off.

Present Representative, Richard D. Edgcumbe, Esq.

Present Representative, Richard D. Edgcumbe, Attorney.





Chichester of Youlston, in the parish of Sherwill, formerly of Ralegh, in the parish of Pilton; Baronet 1641.

arms_page058.jpg

This ancient family is said to have taken its name from Cirencester, in Gloucestershire, the residence of its remote ancestors. The Chichesters were, however, as early as the reign of Henry III. of the county of Devon, although Ralegh came to them at a later period from an heiress of that name; Youlston, the present seat, from an heiress of Beaumont in the time of Henry VII. John de Cirencester, living in the 20th of Henry I. is said to have been the first recorded ancestor.

This ancient family is believed to have taken its name from Cirencester in Gloucestershire, where its distant ancestors lived. The Chichesters were, however, already in Devon during the reign of Henry III, although Ralegh joined them later through an heiress of that name; Youlston, the current seat, came from an heiress of Beaumont during the time of Henry VII. John de Cirencester, who lived in the 20th year of Henry I, is considered the first recorded ancestor.

Younger branches. Chichester of Hall, in Bishop's-Towton; seated at Hall, from an heiress of that name in the 15th century, Chichester of Arlington, since the reign of Henry VII.; and Chichester, Marquis of Donegal, descended from Edward, 3rd son of Sir John Chichester, in the reign of Elizabeth, &c.

Younger branches. Chichester of Hall, in Bishop's-Towton; established at Hall by marrying an heiress of that name in the 15th century, Chichester of Arlington, since the reign of Henry VII.; and Chichester, Marquis of Donegal, descended from Edward, the 3rd son of Sir John Chichester, during the reign of Elizabeth, etc.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1701, pp. 135, 199; Westcote's Devonshire, 303, and Pedigrees, 604, &c., Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 226; Brydges's Collins, viii. 177; Shaw's Staffordshire, i. 374; Lysons, cxi. 440; and Archdall's Lodge's Peerage, ii. 314.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1701, pp. 135, 199; Westcote's Devonshire, 303, and Pedigrees, 604, etc., Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 226; Brydges's Collins, viii. 177; Shaw's Staffordshire, i. 374; Lysons, cxi. 440; and Archdall's Lodge's Peerage, ii. 314.

Arms.—Cheeky or and gules, a chief vair.

Coat of Arms.—Red and gold, with a blue fur chief.

Present Representative, Sir Arthur Chichester, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Arthur Chichester, 8th Baronet.





Fortescue of Castle Hill, Earl Fortescue 1789.

arms_page059.jpg

Like the Chichesters, an ancient and wide-spreading family, settled at Wymodeston, now called Winston, in the parish of Modbury, in the year 1209. "This was," writes Sir William Pole, "the most ancient seat of the Fortescues, in whose possession it continued from the days of King John to the Reign of Queen Elizabeth."

Like the Chichesters, an old and widespread family, settled at Wymodeston, now known as Winston, in the parish of Modbury, in 1209. "This was," writes Sir William Pole, "the most ancient home of the Fortescues, which remained in their possession from the days of King John to the reign of Queen Elizabeth."

There are many younger branches of this family, both in England and Ireland, "to rank which in their seniority, and by delineating the descent to give every man his dew place, surpasseth, I freely confesse, my ability at the present." (Westcote's MSS. quoted by The Topographer, i. 178.) The great glory of this house is Sir John Fortescue, Lord Chief Justice of England in the reign of Henry VI. and the author of' the work "Of absolute and limited Monarchy."

There are many younger branches of this family in both England and Ireland, and figuring out their seniority and mapping the lineage to give each person their rightful place is more than I can handle right now. (Westcote's MSS. quoted by The Topographer, i. 178.) The notable figure from this family is Sir John Fortescue, who was the Lord Chief Justice of England during the reign of Henry VI and wrote the work "Of Absolute and Limited Monarchy."

Among the principal younger branches were the Fortescues of Buckland Filleigh and Fortescue of Fallopit in this county, both extinct in the male line, and the Fortescues of the county of Louth in Ireland, represented by the Barons Clermont.

Among the main younger branches were the Fortescues of Buckland Filleigh and Fortescue of Fallopit in this county, both now extinct in the male line, and the Fortescues from County Louth in Ireland, represented by the Barons Clermont.

See Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, 498, 625, &c.; Prince's Worthies, ed. 1701, 304; Brydges's Collins, v. 335; Lysons, lxxxv.

See Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, 498, 625, &c. Prince's Worthies, ed. 1701, 304; Brydges's Collins, v. 335; Lysons, lxxxv.

Arms.—Azure, a bend engrailed argent cotised or.

Arms.—Blue, with a jagged edge outlined in silver and bordered in gold.

Present Representative, Hugh Fortescue, 3rd Earl Fortescue.

Present Representative, Hugh Fortescue, 3rd Earl Fortescue.





Cary of Torr-Abbey, in the parish of Tor-Mohun.

arms_page060.jpg

An ancient family, the history of which however is involved in great obscurity, supposed by some to have come from Castle Cary, in Somersetshire, by others from Cary, in the parish of St. Giles's in the Heath, near Launceston. It was certainly of the latter place in the reign of Edward I.

An old family, the history of which is quite unclear, is thought by some to have originated from Castle Cary in Somerset, and by others from Cary in the parish of St. Giles's in the Heath, near Launceston. It definitely came from the latter place during the reign of Edward I.

Cockington in this county was, previous to the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century, the principal seat of the family. Torr-Abbey was purchased by Sir George Cary, Knt. in 1662.

Cockington in this county was, before the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century, the main residence of the family. Torr-Abbey was bought by Sir George Cary, Knt. in 1662.

Younger branches. Cary of Follaton, in this county. In the county of Donegal and in that of Cork, and in Guernsey, there are families which claim to be branches of the House of Cary. The present Viscounts Falkland, and the extinct Barons Hunsdon, descend from the second marriage of Sir William Cary, of Cockington, in the time of Henry VII.

Younger branches: Cary of Follaton, in this county. In the counties of Donegal and Cork, and in Guernsey, there are families that say they are branches of the House of Cary. The current Viscounts Falkland, and the now-extinct Barons Hunsdon, are descended from the second marriage of Sir William Cary of Cockington during the time of Henry VII.

See Prince's Worthies, p. 196; Westcote's Devonshire Families, 507, &c.; Lysons, cxxxviii. 524; and Clutterbuck's Hertfordshire, i. 129. For Cary Viscount Falkland, see The Herald and Genealogist, vol. iii.; and for Cary Baron Hunsdon, the same work, vol. iv.

See Prince's Worthies, p. 196; Westcote's Devonshire Families, 507, &c. Lysons, cxxxviii. 524; and Clutterbuck's Hertfordshire, i. 129. For Cary Viscount Falkland, see The Herald and Genealogist, vol. iii.; and for Cary Baron Hunsdon, the same work, vol. iv.

Arms.—Argent, on a bend sable three roses of the first seeded proper, said to have been the arms of a Knight of Arragon, vanquished by Sir Robert Cary in single combat in the reign of Henry V.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, with a black diagonal stripe that has three roses in their natural colors, believed to have belonged to a knight from Aragon, who was defeated by Sir Robert Cary in a duel during the reign of Henry V.

Present Representative, Robert Shedden Sulyarde Cary, Esq.

Present Representative, Robert Shedden Sulyarde Cary, Esq.





Carew of Haccombe, Baronet 1661.

arms_page061.jpg

About the year 1300, by the marriage of Sir John de Carru with a coheiress of Mohun, this ancient family first became connected with the county of Devon. The Carews are descended from Gerald, son of Walter de Windsor, who lived in the reign of Henry I., which Walter was son of Otho, in the time of William the Conqueror. Haccombe was inherited from an heiress of Courtenay, and was settled on this the second branch of the family in the fifteenth century.

About the year 1300, when Sir John de Carru married a coheiress of Mohun, this ancient family first became linked to the county of Devon. The Carews are descendants of Gerald, the son of Walter de Windsor, who lived during the reign of Henry I. Walter was the son of Otho, from the time of William the Conqueror. Haccombe was inherited from a Courtenay heiress and was settled on this second branch of the family in the fifteenth century.

The extinct families of Carew of Bickleigh and Carew Earl of Totnes were descended from Sir Thomas Carew, elder brother of Nicholas, the first of the Haccombe line. The present Lord Carew, of Ireland, represents, in fact the elder line of this family, being descended from a nephew of the Earl of Totnes. Carew of Antony, Baronet (1641), now extinct, was a younger branch of the house of Haccombe.

The extinct families of Carew of Bickleigh and Carew Earl of Totnes were descended from Sir Thomas Carew, the older brother of Nicholas, the first of the Haccombe line. The current Lord Carew from Ireland actually represents the older line of this family, being a descendant of a nephew of the Earl of Totnes. Carew of Antony, Baronet (1641), which is now extinct, was a younger branch of the Haccombe family.

See Leland's Itin., iii. fol. 40; Prince's Worthies of Devon, 148, 176, 204; Westcote's Devonshire, 440; Pedigrees, 528; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 323; Lysons, cxiv. For notices of a branch of this family formerly seated in the county of Cork, see Coll. Topog. and Genealog. v. 95; see also Nicolas's Roll of Carlaverock, p. 154, and Maclean's Life of Sir Peter Carew, London, 8vo. 1857.

See Leland's Itin., iii. fol. 40; Prince's Worthies of Devon, 148, 176, 204; Westcote's Devonshire, 440; Pedigrees, 528; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 323; Lysons, cxiv. For information about a branch of this family that was previously based in County Cork, see Coll. Topog. and Genealog. v. 95; also refer to Nicolas's Roll of Carlaverock, p. 154, and Maclean's Life of Sir Peter Carew, London, 8vo. 1857.

Arms.—Or, three lions passant sable. This coat was borne by Sir Nicholas Carru in 1300. (Roll of Carlaverock.) Sir John de Carru, the same, with a label gules, in the reign of Edward II; and by M. de Carrew in that of Edward III. (Rolls.)

Arms.—Gold, three black lions walking. This coat was used by Sir Nicholas Carru in 1300. (Roll of Carlaverock.) Sir John de Carru, the same, with a red label, during the reign of Edward II; and by M. de Carrew in the time of Edward III. (Rolls.)

Present Representative, Sir Walter Palk Carew, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Walter Palk Carew, 8th Baronet.





Kelly of Kelly.

arms_page062a.jpg

Kelly is a manor in the hundred of Lifton and deanery of Tavistock, and lies on the borders of Cornwall, about six miles from Tavistock. The manor and advowson have been in the family of Kelly at least since the time of Henry II., and here they have uninterruptedly resided since that very early period.

Kelly is a manor in the hundred of Lifton and the deanery of Tavistock, located on the border of Cornwall, about six miles from Tavistock. The manor and the right to appoint clergy have been in the Kelly family since at least the time of Henry II, and they have continuously lived here since that early period.

See Westcote's Pedigrees, p. 540; Lysons, cl. 296.

See Westcote's Pedigrees, p. 540; Lysons, cl. 296.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three billets gules.

Arms.—Silver with a chevron between three red rectangles.

Present Representative, Arthur Kelly, Esq.

Present Rep, Arthur Kelly, Esq.





Pole of Shute, Baronet 1628.

arms_page062b.jpg

This is an ancient Cheshire family, who settled in the county of Devon in the reign of Richard II., Arthur Pole, their ancestor, having married the heiress of Pole of Honiton. The representative of the family, the learned antiquary Sir William Pole, resided at Chute in the early part of the seventeenth century, though the fee of that manor, once the inheritance of the noble family of Bonvile, did not belong to the Poles till it was purchased by Sir John Pole, Baronet, in 1787.

This is an old Cheshire family that moved to Devon during the reign of Richard II. Their ancestor, Arthur Pole, married the heiress of the Pole family from Honiton. The current representative of the family, the knowledgeable historian Sir William Pole, lived in Chute in the early 1600s, even though the ownership of that manor, which was once part of the noble Bonvile family's estate, didn't actually belong to the Poles until it was bought by Sir John Pole, Baronet, in 1787.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, p. 504; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 124; Lysons, cix. 442.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, p. 504; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 124; Lysons, cix. 442.

Arms.—Azure, semée of fleurs-de-lis or, a lion rampant argent.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, scattered with gold lilies, a silver lion in an upright position.

Present Representative, Sir John George Reeve De-la-Pole Pole, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John George Reeve De-la-Pole Pole, 8th Baronet.





Clifford of Ugbrooke, Baron Clifford of Chudleigh 1672.

arms_page063.jpg

An illustrious Norman family, traced to the Conquest, of which the extinct Earls of Cumberland were the chiefs, first connected with Devonshire by the marriage of Thomas, fourth grandson of Sir Louis Clifford, who died in 1404, with a daughter of John Thorpe of King's Teignton.

An impressive Norman family, linked to the Conquest, whose former Earls of Cumberland were the leaders, first connected with Devonshire through the marriage of Thomas, the fourth grandson of Sir Louis Clifford, who died in 1404, to a daughter of John Thorpe of King's Teignton.

Ugbrooke came from an heiress of Courtenay, in the reign of Elizabeth. The peerage was conferred by Charles II. on the Lord Treasurer Clifford, one of the celebrated CABAL.

Ugbrooke came from an heir of Courtenay during Elizabeth's reign. The title was granted by Charles II to Lord Treasurer Clifford, one of the famous CABAL.

Sir Thomas Clifford-Constable, Baronet (1815), represents a younger branch of this family, descended from Thomas, fourth son of the fourth Lord Clifford.

Sir Thomas Clifford-Constable, Baronet (1815), represents a younger branch of this family, descended from Thomas, the fourth son of the fourth Lord Clifford.

See "Cliffordiana," by the Rev. G. Oliver, Exeter, 8vo., and "Collectanea Cliffordiana," Paris, 1817, 8vo.; Erdeswick's Staffordshire, edit. 1844, 73; and for the Earls of Cumberland, and their ancestors the Lords Clifford, see Whitaker's admirable account in his "Craven," ed. 1812, 240, &c., see also Queen's Coll. Ox. MS. cv. for "Evidences of the Cliffords;" Brydges's Collins, vii. 117, and Lysons, xci.; and for the early history of this family, Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. v. p. 146.

See "Cliffordiana," by Rev. G. Oliver, Exeter, 8vo, and "Collectanea Cliffordiana," Paris, 1817, 8vo; Erdeswick's Staffordshire, edit. 1844, 73; and for the Earls of Cumberland and their ancestors, the Lords Clifford, check out Whitaker's excellent account in his "Craven," ed. 1812, 240, etc. Also, see Queen's Coll. Ox. MS. cv. for "Evidences of the Cliffords"; Brydges's Collins, vii. 117, and Lysons, xci.; and for the early history of this family, refer to Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. v. p. 146.

Arms.—Checky or and azure, a fess gules. Borne by Roger de Clifford in the reign of Henry III., and by Walter de Clifford at the same period, instead of a fess, a bend gules. Sir Robert de Clifford, in the reigns of Edward II. and III. bore the present coat. Sir Lewis de Clifford, in the time of Richard II. differenced his coat by a border gules. (Rolls.) See also the Roll of Carlaverock, p. 195.

Arms.—Checkered gold and blue with a red stripe. Used by Roger de Clifford during the reign of Henry III, and by Walter de Clifford at the same time, instead of a stripe, a diagonal red line. Sir Robert de Clifford, during the reigns of Edward II and III, used the current coat. Sir Lewis de Clifford, in the time of Richard II, added a red border to his coat. (Rolls.) See also the Roll of Carlaverock, p. 195.

Present Representative, Hugh Charles Clifford, 8th Baron Clifford of Chudleigh.

Present Representative, Hugh Charles Clifford, 8th Baron Clifford of Chudleigh.





Harington of Dartington (called Champernowne).

arms_page064.jpg

This is a younger line of the ancient and noble family of Harington, formerly of Ridlington, in the county of Rutland, created Baronet in 1611, and still represented by Sir John Edward Harington, the tenth Baronet: the name is local, from Harington in Cumberland, from whence Robert Harington was called in the reign of Henry III.

This is a younger branch of the ancient and noble family of Harington, formerly from Ridlington in Rutland, which was made a Baronet in 1611 and is still represented by Sir John Edward Harington, the tenth Baronet. The name is derived from Harington in Cumberland, from which Robert Harington was called during the reign of Henry III.

A younger branch of the Haringtons was fixed at Ridlington by purchase in the first year of Philip and Mary; but had been seated at Exton in the same county from the reign of Henry VII. Sir James Harington, third Baronet, was attainted in the 13th of Charles II., having been named as one of the Judges of his sovereign Charles I. He sat however only one day, and refused to sign the fatal warrant. Dartington, the ancient seat of the Champernowne family, was carried by an heiress, Jane, only daughter of Arthur Champernowne, Esq., the last heir male of the family, to the Rev. Richard Harington, second son of Sir James Harington, Baronet, grandfather of the present representative, and who assumed her name.

A younger branch of the Haringtons settled in Ridlington after buying land in the first year of Philip and Mary, but they had been based in Exton in the same county since the reign of Henry VII. Sir James Harington, the third Baronet, was declared a traitor in the 13th year of Charles II, having been named as one of the judges for his sovereign Charles I. He only served for one day and refused to sign the deadly warrant. Dartington, the historic home of the Champernowne family, was passed on to Jane, the only daughter of Arthur Champernowne, Esq., the last male heir of the family, who married the Rev. Richard Harington, the second son of Sir James Harington, Baronet, and grandfather of the current representative, who took on her name.

See Wright's History of the County of Rutland, pp. 48, 108; Blore's Rutlandshire; and Courthope's Debrett's Baronetage, p. 10. Arms.—Sable, fretty argent.

See Wright's History of the County of Rutland, pp. 48, 108; Blore's Rutlandshire; and Courthope's Debrett's Baronetage, p. 10. Limbs.—Black with silver fretting.

Present Representative, Arthur Champernowne, Esq.

Present Rep, Arthur Champernowne, Esq.





Gentle.

Bastard of Kitley, in the parish of Yealmton, or Yalmeton.

arms_page065.jpg

Descended from Robert Bastard, who held several manors in this county in the reign of William I. For several generations Efford, in the parish of Egg-Buckland, was the seat of this family, but in the early part of the seventeenth century the hereditary estates were sold, and they were of Wolston and Garston, in West Allington. About the beginning of the eighteenth century Kitley, the present seat, was inherited from the heiress of Pollexfen.

Descended from Robert Bastard, who owned several estates in this county during the reign of William I. For many generations, Efford in the parish of Egg-Buckland was the home of this family, but in the early seventeenth century, the family sold their hereditary estates, which included Wolston and Garston in West Allington. Around the beginning of the eighteenth century, Kitley, the current residence, was inherited from the heiress of Pollexfen.

In 1779, William Bastard, Esq., the representative of this family, was gazetted a Baronet: the honour, which was declined by Mr. Bastard, was intended as an acknowledgment of his services in raising men to defend Plymouth in 1779.

In 1779, William Bastard, Esq., the representative of this family, was announced as a Baronet: the honor, which Mr. Bastard declined, was meant as recognition of his efforts in recruiting men to defend Plymouth in 1779.

See Lysons, cxxxi, and 577.

See Lysons, cxxxi, and 577.

Arms.—Or, a chevron azure.

Arms.—Or, a blue chevron.

Present Representative, Baldwin John Pollexfen Bastard, Esq.

Present Representative, Baldwin John Pollexfen Bastard, Esq.





Acland of Acland, Baronet 1644.

arms_page066.jpg

Acland, which gave name to this ancient family, is now a farm in the parish of Landkey; it is thus described in Westcote's Devonshire, (p. 290:) "Then Landkey, or Londkey; and therein Acland, or rather Aukeland, as taking name from a grove of oaks, for by such an one the house is seated, and hath given name and long habitation to the clarous family of the Aclands, which have many ages here flourished in a worshipful degree." Hugh de Accalen is the first recorded ancestor; he was living in 1155; from whom the present Sir Thomas Dyke Acland is twenty-second in lineal descent. Killerton, in the parish of Broad-Clist, purchased at the beginning of the seventeenth century, is the present seat of the family. Columb-John, an ancient Elizabethan mansion in the same parish, now pulled down, was the earlier residence of the Aclands, who were remarkable for their royalty during the Civil Wars.

Acland, which gave its name to this old family, is now a farm in the parish of Landkey. It is described in Westcote's Devonshire, (p. 290): "Then Landkey, or Londkey; and there Acland, or rather Aukeland, named after a grove of oaks, as the house is located near one, and has provided the name and long residence to the notable family of the Aclands, who have thrived here for many generations in a respected position." Hugh de Accalen is the first recorded ancestor; he was alive in 1155, and from him, the current Sir Thomas Dyke Acland is the twenty-second in direct descent. Killerton, in the parish of Broad-Clist, purchased at the start of the seventeenth century, is the current home of the family. Columb-John, an old Elizabethan mansion in the same parish, now demolished, was the earlier residence of the Aclands, who were known for their royal connections during the Civil Wars.

Younger branch. Acland of Fairfield, Baronet 1818.

Younger branch. Acland of Fairfield, Baronet 1818.

See Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, i. 559; Prince's Worthies of Devon, p. 18; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 407; and Lysons, cxiii.

See Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, i. 559; Prince's Worthies of Devon, p. 18; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 407; and Lysons, cxiii.

Arms.—Checky argent and sable, a fess gules. This coat was borne by M. John Acland, as appears by the Roll of Arms of the reign of Richard II. According to Prince, three oak-leaves on a bend between two lions rampant, was also borne at this time by this family.

Coat of Arms.—Silver and black checkered pattern, with a red band. This coat was used by M. John Acland, as recorded in the Roll of Arms from the reign of Richard II. According to Prince, three oak leaves on a diagonal stripe between two standing lions were also used by this family during that time.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas Dyke-Acland, 10th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas Dyke-Acland, 10th Baronet.





Bamfylde of Poltimore, Baron Poltimore 1831, Baronet 1641.

arms_page067a.jpg

John Baumfield, the ancestor of this family, became possessed of Poltimore in the reign of Edward I.; but the pedigree can be traced three generations before that period.

John Baumfield, the ancestor of this family, acquired Poltimore during the reign of Edward I; however, the family lineage can be tracked back three generations before that time.

A younger branch was of Hardington in Somersetshire, extinct about the beginning of the eighteenth century.

A younger branch was of Hardington in Somerset, which went extinct around the beginning of the eighteenth century.

For the story of the heir of the Bamfyldes taken away and recovered, see Prince's Worthies of Devon, p. 121; see also Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 492; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 188; and Lysons, cx.

For the story of the Bamfylde heir who was taken and then found again, check out Prince's Worthies of Devon, p. 121; also look at Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 492; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 188; and Lysons, cx.

Arms.—Or, on a bend gules three mullets argent.

Coat of Arms.—Gold background with a red diagonal stripe featuring three silver stars.

Present Representative, Augustus Frederick George Warwick Bampfylde, 2nd Baron Poltimore.

Present Representative, Augustus Frederick George Warwick Bampfylde, 2nd Baron Poltimore.





Northcote of Pynes, Baronet 1641.

arms_page067b.jpg

Descended from Galfridus, who was of Northcote, in the parish of East-Downe, in the twelfth century. Hayne, in the parish of Newton St. Cyres, was afterwards acquired by marriage with the heiress of Drew. Pynes was inherited from the heiress of' Stafford, originally Stowford, early in the last century.

Descended from Galfridus, who was from Northcote, in the parish of East-Downe, in the twelfth century. Hayne, in the parish of Newton St. Cyres, was later acquired through marriage with the heiress of Drew. Pynes was inherited from the heiress of Stafford, originally Stowford, early in the last century.

See Lysons, pp. cx. 361, 545, and Wotton's Baronetage; ii. 206.

See Lysons, pp. cx. 361, 545, and Wotton's Baronetage; ii. 206.

Arms.—Argent, three cross-crosslets botonny in bend sable. Used on seals in the reign of Henry VI. The earliest coat, used till the time of Edward III. was Or, a chief gules fretty of the first. Afterwards, Argent, a fess between three cross molines sable. In 1571, Robert Cooke, Clarencieux, is said to have granted, according to the foolish custom of the day, another coat to Walter Northcote of Crediton, grandfather or uncle of the 1st Baronet, viz.: Or, on a pale argent three bends sable. Sir William Pole mentions another coat, Or, three spread eaglets gules, on a chief sable three escallops of the first. But this appears to be a mistake.—From the information of the present Baronet.

Arms.—Silver, featuring three black cross-crosslets in a diagonal line. This was used on seals during Henry VI's reign. The earliest coat, used until Edward III's time, was Gold, with a red chief and a mesh pattern of the same. After that, it changed to Silver, with a band between three black cross molines. In 1571, Robert Cooke, Clarencieux, supposedly granted, following the silly custom of the time, another coat to Walter Northcote of Crediton, who was the grandfather or uncle of the 1st Baronet, described as: Gold, on a silver pale three black bends. Sir William Pole mentions another coat, Gold, with three red spread eaglets, on a black chief three scallops of the first. However, this appears to be an error.—Based on information from the current Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Stafford Henry Northcote, 8th Baronet, M.P. for Stamford.

Present Representative, Sir Stafford Henry Northcote, 8th Baronet, M.P. for Stamford.





Fursdon of Fursdon, in the parish of Cadbury.

arms_page068.jpg

From the days of Henry III. if not from an earlier period, this ancient family has resided at the place from whence the name is derived.

From the days of Henry III, if not even earlier, this old family has lived in the place that the name comes from.

See the Visitation of Devon, 1620, Harl. MS. 1080. fo. 4; Lysons, cxlv. and 92.

See the Visitation of Devon, 1620, Harl. MS. 1080. fo. 4; Lysons, cxlv. and 92.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron azure between three fireballs proper.

Arms.—Silver, with a blue chevron between three natural fireballs.

Present Representative, George Fursdon, Esq.

Present Representative, George Fursdon, Esq.





Strode of Newenham, in the parish of Plympton St. Mary.

arms_page069a.jpg

Originally of Strode, in the parish of Ermington, where Adam de Strode, the first recorded ancestor, was seated in the reign of Henry III, In that of Henry IV. by the marriage of the coheiress of Newenham of Newenham, they became possessed of that place, since the seat of the family. "A right ancient and honourable family," says Prince; it may also be called an historical one, William Strode, of this house, being one of the Five Members of the House of Commons demanded by Charles I. in 1641.

Originally from Strode, in the parish of Ermington, where Adam de Strode, the first recorded ancestor, lived during the reign of Henry III. In the time of Henry IV, through the marriage of the coheiress of Newenham, they acquired that estate, which has since been the family seat. "A very old and honorable family," says Prince; it could also be described as a historical one, as William Strode from this family was one of the Five Members of the House of Commons sought by Charles I in 1641.

See Prince's Worthies, p. 563; Westcote's Pedigrees, p. 542; Lysons, clv.

See Prince's Worthies, p. 563; Westcote's Pedigrees, p. 542; Lysons, clv.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three conies sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a chevron between three black rabbits.

Present Representative, George Strode, Esq.

Present Rep, George Strode, Esq.





Walrond of Dulford in the parish of Broad Hembury.

arms_page069b.jpg

This is a younger branch of an ancient family seated at Bradfield, in Uffculm, as early as the reign of Henry III, For many years the Walronds, living at their venerable mansion of Bradfield, were a powerful family in Devonshire. The male line of this the principal branch has become extinct since the time of Lysons, and the representation devolved on the present family, descended from Colonel Humphry Walrond, a distinguished Loyalist during the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century. On the fall of the Royal Cause he emigrated to Barbadoes, of which island with the aid of other Royalists he made himself Governor. Philip IV. of Spain conferred upon him the title of Marques de Vallado, and other Spanish honours, for, as the still existing patent states, "services rendered to the Spanish Marine."

This is a younger branch of an ancient family based in Bradfield, Uffculm, since the reign of Henry III. For many years, the Walronds, living in their historic mansion of Bradfield, were a powerful family in Devon. The main male line of this branch has died out since Lysons' time, and the representation was passed down to the current family, who are descended from Colonel Humphry Walrond, a notable Loyalist during the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century. After the Royal Cause fell, he moved to Barbados, where, with the help of other Royalists, he became Governor of the island. Philip IV of Spain granted him the title of Marques de Vallado and other Spanish honors for, as noted in the still-existing patent, "services rendered to the Spanish Marine."

See Lysons, clviii. and 540; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 484.

See Lysons, clviii. and 540; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 484.

Arms.—Argent, three bull's heads cabossed sable.

Arms.—Silver, featuring three black bull's heads looking straight ahead.

Present Representative, Bethell Walrond, Esq.

Present Representative, Bethell Walrond, Esq.





Bellew of Court, in the parish of Stockleigh-English.

arms_page070.jpg

This is a younger branch of the great Anglo-Irish family of Bellew of Bar-meath, in the county of Meath, settled in Devonshire in the reign of Edward IV., in consequence of a marriage with one of the coheiresses of Fleming of Bratton-Fleming.

This is a more recent branch of the prominent Anglo-Irish family of Bellew from Barmeath, in County Meath, who settled in Devonshire during the reign of Edward IV, due to a marriage with one of the co-heiresses of Fleming from Bratton-Fleming.

See the Visitations of Devon in 1564 and 1620: Lysons, cxxxiv. and 455.

See the Visitations of Devon in 1564 and 1620: Lysons, cxxxiv. and 455.

Arms.—Sable, fretty or, a crescent for difference.

Coat of Arms.—Black with a pattern of gold frets, featuring a crescent for distinction.

Present Representative, John Prestwood Bellew, Esq.

Present Representative, John Prestwood Bellew, Esq.





Drewe of Grange, in the parish of Broad Hembury.

arms_page071.jpg

The name is derived from Drogo or Dru, and is supposed to be Norman. The first proved ancestor of the family however is William Drewe, who married an heiress of Prideaux of Orcheston in this county, and appears to have lived about the beginning of the fourteenth century. His son was of Sharpham, also in Devonshire. The present seat was erected by Sir Thomas Drewe in 1610.

The name comes from Drogo or Dru and is believed to be Norman. The first confirmed ancestor of the family is William Drewe, who married an heiress from the Prideaux family of Orcheston in this county and is thought to have lived around the early fourteenth century. His son was from Sharpham, also in Devonshire. The current residence was built by Sir Thomas Drewe in 1610.

Younger branches of this family were of Drew's Cliffe and High Hayne in Newton St. Cyres.

Younger branches of this family were from Drew's Cliffe and High Hayne in Newton St. Cyres.

See Lysons, cxliii. and 266; Westcote's Pedigrees, 582-3; and the Topographer and Genealogist, ii. 209, for the Drews of Ireland, descended from a second son of the house of Drew's Cliffe, who came to Ireland, and settled at Meanus, in the county of Kerry, in 1633; see also Prince's Worthies, 1st ed. p. 249.

See Lysons, cxliii. and 266; Westcote's Pedigrees, 582-3; and the Topographer and Genealogist, ii. 209, for the Drews of Ireland, descended from a second son of the house of Drew's Cliffe, who came to Ireland and settled at Meanus in County Kerry in 1633; see also Prince's Worthies, 1st ed. p. 249.

Arms.—Ermine, a lion passant gules.

Arms.—White with a red lion walking.

Present Representative, Edward Simcoe Drewe, Esq.

Present Representative, Edward Simcoe Drewe, Esq.





Buller of Downes, in the parish of Crediton.

arms_page072.jpg

This is the head of the wide-spread family of Buller, of which there are several branches in the Western counties. The first recorded ancestor appears to be Ralph Buller, who in the fourteenth century was seated at Woode, in the hundred of South Petherton, and county of Somerset, by an heiress of Beauchamp. They became possessed of Lillesdon, in the same county, and afterwards, by an heiress of Trethurffe, we find them at Tregarrick, in Cornwall, but were not till the eighteenth century of Downes, which came from the coheiress of Gould.

This is the head of the widespread Buller family, which has several branches in the Western counties. The first recorded ancestor seems to be Ralph Buller, who in the fourteenth century lived at Woode, in the hundred of South Petherton, Somerset, through a marriage with a Beauchamp heiress. They acquired Lillesdon in the same county, and later, through a Trethurffe heiress, we find them at Tregarrick in Cornwall. However, they were not associated with Downes until the eighteenth century, which came from the coheiress of Gould.

Younger branches. Buller of Morval and of Lanreath, both in the county of Cornwall. Buller of Lupton, in this county, Baronet 1790, Baron Churston 1858.

Younger branches. Buller of Morval and Lanreath, both in Cornwall. Buller of Lupton, in this county, Baronet 1790, Baron Churston 1858.

See Lysons, cxxxvi.; Carew's Cornwall, ed. 1st, p. 133 b; and Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, ii. 38.

See Lysons, cxxxvi.; Carew's Cornwall, 1st ed., p. 133 b; and Gilbert's Survey of Cornwall, ii. 38.

Arms.—Sable, on a plain cross argent, quarter pierced, four eagles of the field.

Coat of Arms.—Black, with a plain silver cross that is quarter pierced, showing four eagles in the background.

Present Representative, James Wentworth Buller, Esq.

Present Representative, James Wentworth Buller, Esq.





Huyshe of Sand.

arms_page073.jpg

Originally of Doniford, in Somersetshire, where John de Hywish is said to have been seated in the early part of the thirteenth century. Sand, in the parish of Sidbury, came by purchase to an ancestor of the family in the reign of Elizabeth; and, although we find it in Lysons's List of the Decayed Mansions of the County of Devon, it still remains the inheritance of this ancient family.

Originally from Doniford in Somerset, where John de Hywish is believed to have lived in the early 1200s. Sand, located in the parish of Sidbury, was bought by an ancestor of the family during the reign of Elizabeth; and, although it appears in Lysons's List of the Decayed Mansions of the County of Devon, it is still part of the inheritance of this ancient family.

See Lysons, cxlix. v. 144, and Burke's History of the Commoners, 1st ed. vol. iv. p. 409.

See Lysons, cxlix. v. 144, and Burke's History of the Commoners, 1st ed. vol. iv. p. 409.

Arms.—Argent, on a bend sable three lutes naiant of the first.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a black diagonal stripe that has three lutes in silver.

Present Representative, the Rev. John Huyshe.

Present Representative, the Rev. John Huyshe.





DORSETSHIRE.

Knightly.

Bingham of Bingham's Melcombe.

arms_page074.jpg

Sir John de Bingham, Knight, who lived in the reign of Henry I., is the first recorded ancestor of this ancient family; he was of Sutton, in the county of Somerset. Melcombe was inherited from an heiress of Turberville in the time of Henry III., and has been ever since the residence of the Binghams, of whom the most remarkable was Sir Richard, a younger son of the head of the family in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, who greatly distinguished himself in Ireland.

Sir John de Bingham, Knight, who lived during the reign of Henry I, is the first documented ancestor of this ancient family; he came from Sutton in Somerset. Melcombe was passed down from an heiress of the Turberville family during the time of Henry III and has since been the home of the Binghams. The most notable among them was Sir Richard, a younger son of the family leader during Queen Elizabeth's reign, who made a significant name for himself in Ireland.

Younger branch. The Earls of Lucan in the Peerage of Ireland (1795) descended from George, fourth son of Robert Bingham and Alice Coker, and younger brother of Sir Richard.

Younger branch. The Earls of Lucan in the Peerage of Ireland (1795) descended from George, the fourth son of Robert Bingham and Alice Coker, and the younger brother of Sir Richard.

See Hutchins's History of Dorset, vol. iv. 202; and Archdall's Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, vii. 104.

See Hutchins's History of Dorset, vol. iv. 202; and Archdall's Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, vii. 104.

Arms.—Azure, a bend cotised between six crosses patée or.

Coat of Arms.—Blue background with a diagonal stripe edged by six gold crosses.

Present Representative, Richard Hippisley Bingham, Esq.

Present Representative, Richard Hippisley Bingham, Esq.





Russell of Kingston-Russell, Duke of Bedford 1694, Earl of Bedford 1550.

arms_page075.jpg

Although this family may be said to have made their fortune in the reign of Henry VII., first by Mr. John Russell's accidental meeting with Philip Archduke of Austria, and his consequent introduction to the King, and secondly by the large share of ecclesiastical plunder acquired by this same John at the Dissolution of the Monasteries, yet there is no reason to doubt that the Russells are sprung from a younger branch of an ancient baronial family, of whom the elder line were known by the name of Gorges, and were Barons of Parliament in the time of Edward III.

Although this family can be said to have made their fortune during the reign of Henry VII—first through Mr. John Russell's chance encounter with Philip, Archduke of Austria, which led to his introduction to the King, and second by the significant portion of church wealth acquired by John during the Dissolution of the Monasteries—there's no doubt that the Russells come from a younger branch of an ancient baronial family, whose older line was known as Gorges and were Barons of Parliament during the time of Edward III.

The Russells were seated at Kingston as early as the reign of Henry III.

The Russells had been living at Kingston since the time of Henry III.

See Wiffen's House of Russell, and Brydges's Collins, i. 266, &c.

See Wiffen's House of Russell, and Brydges's Collins, i. 266, &c.

Arms.—Argent, a lion rampant gules, on a chief sable three escallops of the first.

Coat of Arms.—Silver field with a red lion standing on its hind legs, over a black upper section featuring three silver shells.

Present Representative, William Russell, 8th Duke of Bedford, K.G.

Present Representative, William Russell, 8th Duke of Bedford, K.G.





Digby from Tilton, Baron Digby of Sherborne 1765, Baron Digby of Geashill in Ireland 1620.

arms_page076.jpg

An ancient Leicestershire family, to be traced nearly to the Conquest, and supposed to be of Saxon origin. The name is derived from Digby, in Lincolnshire; but Tilton, in the county of Leicester, where AElmar, the first recorded ancestor of the Digbys, held lands in 1086, also gave name to the earlier generations of the family. These ancient possessions have long ceased to belong to the Digbys; and by the will of the last Earl Digby, who died in 1856, the manor of Coleshill, in Warwickshire, granted by Henry VII. to Simon Digby, and the Castle of Sherborne, in Dorsetshire, have also been alienated from the male line of the family.

An ancient family from Leicestershire can be traced back nearly to the Conquest and is believed to have Saxon roots. The name comes from Digby in Lincolnshire, but Tilton in Leicester County, where AElmar, the first recorded ancestor of the Digbys, owned land in 1086, also contributed to the family's earlier name. These historic lands no longer belong to the Digbys; and according to the will of the last Earl Digby, who passed away in 1856, the manor of Coleshill in Warwickshire, granted by Henry VII to Simon Digby, and the Castle of Sherborne in Dorsetshire have also been separated from the male line of the family.

There have been several branches of the Digbys both in England and Ireland, besides the extinct Earls of Bristol. During the seventeenth century the history of the family, as evinced in the lives of the celebrated Sir Kenelm Digby and the Earl of Bristol, is very remarkable.

There have been several branches of the Digbys in both England and Ireland, in addition to the now-extinct Earls of Bristol. During the seventeenth century, the family's history, as shown through the lives of the famous Sir Kenelm Digby and the Earl of Bristol, is quite notable.

See Leland's Itin., iv. fo. 19; Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed., vol. ii. 1012; and Pedigree of Digby of Tilton, Eye, Kettleby, Sisonby, North Luffenham, and Welby, in Nichols's Leicestershire, ii. pt. i. p. *261; for a more extended Pedigree see vol. iii. pt. i. p. 473, under Tilton; Brydges's Collins, v. 348; Hutchins's Dorset, iv. 133; and for an account of the famous Digby Pedigree, compiled by order of Sir Kenelm in 1634, at the expense, it is said, of £1200, see Pennant's Journey from Chester to London, 8vo. 1811, p. 441; and for portraits of the Digbys at Gothurst, ib. p. 449.

See Leland's Itin., iv. fo. 19; Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed., vol. ii. 1012; and the Pedigree of Digby of Tilton, Eye, Kettleby, Sisonby, North Luffenham, and Welby, in Nichols's Leicestershire, ii. pt. i. p. *261; for a more detailed Pedigree, see vol. iii. pt. i. p. 473, under Tilton; Brydges's Collins, v. 348; Hutchins's Dorset, iv. 133; and for an account of the famous Digby Pedigree, compiled by order of Sir Kenelm in 1634, at a reported cost of £1200, see Pennant's Journey from Chester to London, 8vo. 1811, p. 441; and for portraits of the Digbys at Gothurst, ib. p. 449.

Arms.—Azure, a fleur-de-lis argent.

Arms.—Blue, a silver fleur-de-lis.

Present Representative, Edward St. Vincent Digby, 9th Baron Digby of Geashill.

Present Representative, Edward St. Vincent Digby, 9th Baron Digby of Geashill.





Gentle.

Frampton of Moreton.

arms_page077.jpg

John de Frampton, M. P. for Dorset in 1373 and 1380, is the first recorded ancestor; his son Walter, having married Margaret heiress of the Manor of Moreton, became possessed of that estate as early as the year 1365, which has since continued the seat of the family.

John de Frampton, M.P. for Dorset in 1373 and 1380, is the first recorded ancestor. His son Walter married Margaret, the heiress of the Manor of Moreton, and gained ownership of that estate as early as 1365, which has since remained the family home.

See Hutchins's History of Dorset, vol. i. 238, where the pedigree is given from the Heralds' Office, CC. 22, 155, continued from 1623 to 1753 by James Lane, Richmond Herald, and the new edition of Hutchins, vol. i. p. 398.

See Hutchins's History of Dorset, vol. i. 238, where the family tree is provided from the Heralds' Office, CC. 22, 155, continued from 1623 to 1753 by James Lane, Richmond Herald, and the new edition of Hutchins, vol. i. p. 398.

Arms.—Argent, a bend pules cotised sable. Said to have been borne by the first ancestor, John Frampton.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, featuring a dark diagonal stripe outlined in black. This design is believed to have been used by the original ancestor, John Frampton.

Present Representative, Henry James Frampton, Esq.

Present Representative, Henry James Frampton, Esq.





Bond of Grange and Lutton, in the parish of Steple, in the Isle of Purbeck.

arms_page078a.jpg

Originally of Cornwall, and said to be a family of great antiquity, but not connected with Dorset till the middle of the fifteenth century. In 1431 (9th Henry VI.) Robert Bond of Beauchamp's Hache, in the county of Somerset, was seated at Lutton, his mother having been the heiress of that name and family. Grange was purchased by Nathaniel Bond, Esq in 1686.

Originally from Cornwall and claimed to have a long history, this family didn’t connect with Dorset until the mid-fifteenth century. In 1431 (9th Henry VI), Robert Bond of Beauchamp's Hache in Somerset was established at Lutton, as his mother was the heiress of that name and family. Nathaniel Bond, Esq., bought Grange in 1686.

There were other branches of this family seated at Blackmanston, Swanwick, and Wareham.

There were other branches of this family living in Blackmanston, Swanwick, and Wareham.

See Hutchins's History of Dorset, vol. i. 326, and the new edition, vol. i. p. 602.

See Hutchins's History of Dorset, vol. i. 326, and the new edition, vol. i. p. 602.

Arms.—Sable, a fess or. A former coat, recognised in the Visitation of Dorset in 1623, was, Argent, on a chevron sable three besants.

Coat of Arms.—Black, with a gold band. The earlier coat, recognized in the Visitation of Dorset in 1623, was Silver, featuring a black chevron with three round gold coins.

Present Representative, The Rev. Nathaniel Bond.

Present Representative, The Rev. Nathaniel Bond.





Tregonwell of Anderson and Cranborne.

arms_page078b.jpg

The name is derived from Tregonwell, in the parish of Cranstock and county of Cornwall, and there the remote ancestors of this family doubtless resided, though the pedigree is not proved beyond the latter part of the fifteenth century. In the reign of Henry VIII., Sir John Tregonwell was employed by the king on his matrimonial affairs, and sent into France, Germany, and Italy. His services were rewarded by grants of monastic lands, among others by the mitred Abbey of Milton in this county. Milton was sold to the Damers in the eighteenth century, and Anderson purchased in 1622.

The name comes from Tregonwell, in the parish of Cranstock and county of Cornwall, where the early ancestors of this family likely lived, though the family history isn't confirmed beyond the late 1400s. During the reign of Henry VIII, Sir John Tregonwell was assigned by the king to handle his marriage matters and was sent to France, Germany, and Italy. His work was rewarded with grants of monastic lands, including the abbey of Milton in this county. Milton was sold to the Damers in the 1700s, and Anderson bought it in 1622.

See Gilbert's Cornwall, ii. 313; Hutchins's Dorset, iv. 210, and the new edition, i. p. 161.

See Gilbert's Cornwall, ii. 313; Hutchins's Dorset, iv. 210, and the new edition, i. p. 161.

Arms.—Argent, on a fess cotised sable, between three Cornish choughs proper three plates.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a black band bordered on either side, featuring three Cornish choughs in their natural colors and three discs in between.

Present Representative, John Tregonwell, Esq.

Present Rep, John Tregonwell, Esq.





Weld of Lulworth Castle.

arms_page079.jpg

Founded by William Weld, Sheriff of London in 1352, who married Anne Wettenhall; his posterity were seated at Eaton in Cheshire, till the reign of Charles II. The present family are descended from Sir Humphry, Lord Mayor of London in 1609, who was fourth son of John Weld of Eaton and Joan Fitzhugh. Lulworth was purchased in 1641.

Founded by William Weld, Sheriff of London in 1352, who married Anne Wettenhall; his descendants lived in Eaton, Cheshire, until the reign of Charles II. The current family is descended from Sir Humphry, Lord Mayor of London in 1609, who was the fourth son of John Weld of Eaton and Joan Fitzhugh. Lulworth was bought in 1641.

Younger branch, Weld-Blundell of Ince-Blundell, Lancashire.

Younger branch, Weld-Blundell of Ince-Blundell, Lancashire.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, ii. 131; Hutchins's Dorset, i. 226; and the new edition, i. p. 372; Blakeway's Sheriffs of Salop, p. 120,

See Ormerod's Cheshire, ii. 131; Hutchins's Dorset, i. 226; and the new edition, i. p. 372; Blakeway's Sheriffs of Salop, p. 120,

Arms.—Azure, a fess nebulée between three crescents ermine. Confirmed by Camden in 1606. See Morgan's Sphere of Gentry, book 2, p. 112.

Arms.—Blue with a wavy band between three white crescents. Confirmed by Camden in 1606. See Morgan's Sphere of Gentry, book 2, p. 112.

Present Representative, Edward Weld, Esq.

Present Representative, Edward Weld, Esq.





Floyer of West-Stafford.

arms_page080.jpg

This is a Devonshire family of good antiquity seated at Floyers-Hayes, in the parish of St. Thomas in that county, soon after the Norman Conquest. That estate appears to have remained in the family till the latter part of the seventeenth century. The Floyers afterwards removed into Dorsetshire, of which county Anthony Floyer, Esq. was a justice of the peace in 1701.

This is a Devonshire family with a long history, based at Floyers-Hayes in the parish of St. Thomas in that county, shortly after the Norman Conquest. It seems that the estate stayed in the family until the late seventeenth century. The Floyers later moved to Dorset, where Anthony Floyer, Esq. was a justice of the peace in 1701.

See Prince's Worthies of Devonshire, ed. 1701, p. 308; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 556.

See Prince's Worthies of Devonshire, ed. 1701, p. 308; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 556.

Arms.—Sable, a chevron between three broad arrows argent.

Coat of Arms.—Black with a chevron between three silver broad arrows.

Present Representative, John Floyer, Esq. M. P. for Dorset.

Present Representative, John Floyer, Esq. M.P. for Dorset.





DURHAM.

Knightly.

Lumley of Lumley Castle, Earl of Scarborough 1690, Viscount Lumley of Ireland 1628.

arms_page081.jpg

This very distinguished family is of Anglo-Saxon descent, and has been seated in this county from the time of the Conquest; Liulph, who lived before the year 1080, is the first recorded ancestor. In the female line the Lumleys represent the Barons Thweng of Kilton, and from hence the arms borne by this ancient house, who were themselves summoned as Barons from the 8th of Richard II. to the 1st of Henry IV. The elder line of the family became extinct on the death of John Lord Lumley in 1609. It was during the time of this Lord that the following anecdote is told. "Oh, mon, gang na farther; let me digest the knowledge I ha' gained, for I did na ken Adam's name was Lumley,"—exclaimed King James I. when wearied with Bishop James's prolix account of the Lumley Pedigree, on his Majesty's first visit to Lumley Castle in 1603. For the curious story of the lucky leap of Richard Lumley, the immediate ancestor of the present family, see Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. pt. i. 363; and Surtees's Durham, ii. 162.

This very distinguished family is of Anglo-Saxon descent and has been established in this county since the time of the Conquest; Liulph, who lived before 1080, is the first recorded ancestor. Through the female line, the Lumleys descend from the Barons Thweng of Kilton, which is where the arms used by this ancient house come from. They were summoned as Barons from the 8th year of Richard II to the 1st year of Henry IV. The elder line of the family became extinct with the death of John Lord Lumley in 1609. It was during this Lord's time that the following anecdote is told. "Oh, man, don't go any further; let me digest the knowledge I've gained, for I did not know Adam's name was Lumley," exclaimed King James I when he was tired of Bishop James's lengthy account of the Lumley Pedigree during His Majesty's first visit to Lumley Castle in 1603. For the interesting story of the lucky leap of Richard Lumley, the direct ancestor of the current family, see Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. pt. i. 363; and Surtees's Durham, ii. 162.

See also Leland's Itin., vi. fol. 62; Brydges's Collins, iii. 693; the Roll of Carlaverock by Sir H. Nicolas, p.313; and the Surrey Archaeological collections, vol. iii. pp. 324-348, for a valuable account of the Lumley monuments in Cheam church, and notes on the pedigree and arms.

See also Leland's Itin., vi. fol. 62; Brydges's Collins, iii. 693; the Roll of Carlaverock by Sir H. Nicolas, p.313; and the Surrey Archaeological collections, vol. iii. pp. 324-348, for a valuable overview of the Lumley monuments in Cheam church, along with notes on the family tree and coat of arms.

Arms.—Argent, a fess gules between three popinjays proper, collared of the second. This coat was borne by Marmaduke de Twenge in the reign of Henry III. and by M. de Thwenge and Monsieur Rauf Lumleye in the reign of Edward III. and Richard II. (Rolls.) John le Fitz Marmaduke bore, Gules, a fess and three popinjays argent. (Roll of Carlaverock, 1300.) Sir Robert de Lumley the same, but on the fess three mullets sable. (Roll of the reign of Edward II) See the seal of John Lord Lumley, who died in 1421, in Bysshe's Notes on Upton, p. 58.

Arms.—Silver, a red stripe between three properly depicted parrots, each with a red collar. This coat was used by Marmaduke de Twenge during Henry III's reign, and by M. de Thwenge and Monsieur Rauf Lumleye during the reigns of Edward III and Richard II. (Rolls.) John le Fitz Marmaduke bore Red, a stripe and three silver parrots. (Roll of Carlaverock, 1300.) Sir Robert de Lumley had the same, but on the stripe were three black stars. (Roll of the reign of Edward II.) See the seal of John Lord Lumley, who died in 1421, in Bysshe's Notes on Upton, p. 58.

Present Representative, Richard George Lumley, 9th Earl of Scarborough.

Present Representative, Richard George Lumley, 9th Earl of Scarborough.





Salvin of Croxdale.

arms_page082.jpg

Sir Osbert Silvayne, Knight, of Norton Woodhouse, in the Forest of Sherwood, living in the 29th of Henry III., is the first proved ancestor of this family: he is said to have been son of Ralph Silvayne. Some of the name, which we may supposed to be derived from this wood or forest, were seated at Norton before the year 1140. Croxdale was inherited from the heiress of Whalton in 1402.

Sir Osbert Silvayne, Knight, of Norton Woodhouse, in the Forest of Sherwood, living during the reign of Henry III in 1244, is the first confirmed ancestor of this family: he is believed to be the son of Ralph Silvayne. Some people with this name, which we assume is derived from this wood or forest, were already established in Norton before the year 1140. Croxdale was inherited from the heiress of Whalton in 1402.

Younger branch, Salvin of Sunderland Bridge, in this county.

Younger branch, Salvin of Sunderland Bridge, in this county.

See Surtees's Durham iv. 117, and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, ii. p. 340. For the extinct family of Salvin of Newbiggen, see Graves's Cleveland.

See Surtees's Durham iv. 117, and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, ii. p. 340. For the extinct family of Salvin of Newbiggen, see Graves's Cleveland.

Arms.—Argent, on a chief sable two mullets pierced or. This coat was borne by Sir Gerard Salveyn in the reign of Edward II., and also I suppose by the same Sir Gerard in that of Edward III., but here the mullets are voided vert. Again, in the reign of Richard II, Monsieur Gerard Salvayn bore his mullets of six points or, pierced gules.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a black chief featuring two gold pierced stars. This coat was used by Sir Gerard Salveyn during the reign of Edward II, and I believe by the same Sir Gerard during the reign of Edward III, but here the stars are empty green. Additionally, during the reign of Richard II, Monsieur Gerard Salvayn displayed his gold six-pointed stars, pierced red.

Present Representative, Gerard Salvin, Esq.

Presenting Representative, Gerard Salvin, Esq.





Gentle.

Lambton of Lambton Castle, Earl of Durham 1833, Baron 1828.

arms_page083.jpg

According to Surtees, traced to Robert de Lambton, Lord of Lambton in 1314. 'There was, it is true, a John de Lambton, living between 1180 and 1200, but the pedigree cannot be proved beyond this Robert. The Lambtons were among the first families of the North who embraced the Reformed Religion, and were loyal during the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century.

According to Surtees, this can be traced back to Robert de Lambton, Lord of Lambton in 1314. 'There was, indeed, a John de Lambton, who lived between 1180 and 1200, but the family lineage cannot be proved beyond this Robert. The Lambtons were among the first families in the North to adopt the Reformed Religion and remained loyal during the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century.

See Surtees's Durham, ii. 174.

See Surtees's Durham, vol. II, p. 174.

Arms.—Sable, a fess between three lambs trippant argent.

Coat of Arms.—Black background with a horizontal band between three upright silver lambs.

Present Representative, George Frederick D'Arcy Lambton, 2nd Earl of Durham.

Present Representative, George Frederick D'Arcy Lambton, 2nd Earl of Durham.





ESSEX.

Knightly.

Tyrell of Boreham, Baronet 1809.

arms_page084.jpg

"This is," says Morant, "one of the most ancient knightly families which has subsisted to our own days;" descended from Walter Tyrell, who held the manor of Langham, in this county, at the time of Domesday; it is doubtful whether he was the person who shot William Rufus. Indeed, although the ancient descent of the Terells or Tyrells is generally admitted, the pedigree appears to require the attention of an experienced genealogist. There have been many branches of the Tyrells in this and other counties; the present is a junior one of the original stock, and Boreham a very recent possession.

"This is," says Morant, "one of the oldest knightly families that has survived to this day;" descended from Walter Tyrell, who owned the manor of Langham in this county back in the Domesday period; it's uncertain whether he was the one who shot William Rufus. In fact, while the ancient lineage of the Terells or Tyrells is widely accepted, the family tree seems to need the expertise of a skilled genealogist. There have been many branches of the Tyrells in this and other counties; the current branch is a junior offshoot of the original family, and Boreham is a very recent acquisition.

Elder branches now extinct:—

Elder branches are now extinct:—

Tyrell of Thornton, co. Buckingham, Baronet 1627 to 1749. Tyrell of Springfield, Essex, Baronet 1666 to 1766.

Tyrell of Thornton, Buckinghamshire, Baronet 1627 to 1749. Tyrell of Springfield, Essex, Baronet 1666 to 1766.

See Morant's History of Essex, i. 208; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 85, iii. 610.

See Morant's History of Essex, i. 208; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 85, iii. 610.

Arms.—Argent, two chevrons azure within a border engrailed gules

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, with two blue chevrons inside a red wavy border

Present Representative, Sir John Tyssen Tyrell, 2nd Baronet, late M.P. for Essex.

Present Representative, Sir John Tyssen Tyrell, 2nd Baronet, former M.P. for Essex.





Waldegrave of Naverstoke, Earl Waldegrave, 1729; Baronet 1685, Baronet 1643.

arms_page085.jpg

An ancient family, which has been seated in many counties, originally of Waldegrave, in Northamptonshire; afterwards settled in Suffolk; about the latter end of the fifteenth century, seised of lands in this county; and again we find them in Norfolk and Somersetshire. Naverstock was granted by Queen Mary in 1553, the Waldegraves having suffered for their attachment to the old faith at the time of the Reformation. Leland thus mentions the family; "As far as I could gather of young Walgreve, of the Courte, the eldest house of the Walgreves cummith owt of the Town of Northampton or ther about, and there yet remaineth in Northamptonshire a man of landes of that name."

An old family that has lived in many counties, originally from Waldegrave in Northamptonshire, later settled in Suffolk. By the end of the fifteenth century, they owned land in this county, and we also find them in Norfolk and Somerset. Naverstock was granted by Queen Mary in 1553, as the Waldegraves had suffered for their loyalty to the old faith during the Reformation. Leland mentions the family like this: "From what I could gather about young Walgreve of the Court, the oldest branch of the Walgreves comes from the town of Northampton or nearby, and there is still a landowner by that name in Northamptonshire."

See Leland's Itinerary, iv. fol. 19; Morant's Essex, i. 181; Brydges's Collins, iv. 232; and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, ii. p. 374, for an interesting memoir of Sir Richard Waldegrave, who died in 1401, having been chosen Speaker of the House of Commons in 1381.

See Leland's Itinerary, iv. fol. 19; Morant's Essex, i. 181; Brydges's Collins, iv. 232; and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, ii. p. 374, for an interesting biography of Sir Richard Waldegrave, who died in 1401 after being elected Speaker of the House of Commons in 1381.

Younger branch, Baron Radstock, of Ireland, 1800, descended from the younger brother of the fourth Earl Waldegrave.

Younger branch, Baron Radstock, of Ireland, 1800, descended from the younger brother of the fourth Earl Waldegrave.

Arms.—Per pale argent and gules. This coat was borne by M. Richard Waldeg've, as appears by the Roll of the reign of Richard II.

Coat of Arms.—Divided in white and red. This coat was used by M. Richard Waldeg've, as indicated in the Roll from the reign of Richard II.

Present Representative, William Frederick Waldegrave, 9th Earl Waldegrave.

Present Representative, William Frederick Waldegrave, 9th Earl Waldegrave.





Disney of the Hyde, in the parish of Ingatstone.

arms_page086.jpg

A younger branch of an ancient Knightly Norman house, settled for many years at Norton D'Isney in Lincolnshire, where the principal line became extinct in 1722. The present family descend from the eldest son by the second marriage of Sir Henry Disney of Norton Disney, who died in 1641. See very elaborate pedigrees of this family in the College of Arms, Norfolk 1, p. 38, and Norfolk 7, p. 76; also Hutchins's Dorset, iv. p. 389, for Disney of Swinderby, co. Lincoln, and of Corscomb, co. Dorset, and for the present family.

A younger branch of an ancient Norman knightly family settled for many years in Norton D'Isney, Lincolnshire, where the main line became extinct in 1722. The current family descends from the eldest son of Sir Henry Disney of Norton Disney's second marriage, who died in 1641. For detailed family pedigrees, see the College of Arms, Norfolk 1, p. 38, and Norfolk 7, p. 76; also, refer to Hutchins's Dorset, iv. p. 389, for the Disney family from Swinderby, Lincolnshire, and Corscomb, Dorset, as well as for the present family.

See also the Topographer and Genealogist, iii. 393; and Leland's Itinerary, i. p. 28, "Disney, alias De Iseney. He dwelleth at Diseney, and of his name and line be Gentilmen yn Fraunce."

See also the Topographer and Genealogist, iii. 393; and Leland's Itinerary, i. p. 28, "Disney, also known as De Iseney. He lives in Diseney, and from his name and lineage, he is a gentleman in France."

Arms.—Argent, on a fess gules three fleurs-de-lis or. In the reign of Richard II. Monsieur William Dysney bore, Argent, three lions passant in pale gules. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a red band featuring three golden fleurs-de-lis. During the reign of Richard II, Monsieur William Dysney showed Silver, three red lions walking in a vertical line. (Roll.)

Present Representative, Edgar Disney, Esq.

Present Representative, Edgar Disney, Esq.





Gentle.

Gent of Moyns.

arms_page087.jpg

The family of Gent was seated at Wymbish in this county in 1328. William Gent, living in 1468, married Joan, daughter and heir of William Moyne of Moyne or Moyns. His widow purchased that manor in 1494, and it has since continued the seat of this family, who were greatly advanced by Sir Thomas Gent, the Judge, in the reign of Queen Elizabeth.

The Gent family settled in Wymbish in this county in 1328. William Gent, who was alive in 1468, married Joan, the daughter and heir of William Moyne of Moyne or Moyns. His widow bought that manor in 1494, and it has remained the family's home since then. The family was significantly elevated by Sir Thomas Gent, the Judge, during the reign of Queen Elizabeth.

See Morant's History of Essex, ii. 353.

See Morant's History of Essex, vol. 2, p. 353.

Arms.—Ermine, a chief indented sable. Sometimes a chevron sable is borne on the field. The Judge bore two spread eagles on the chief, as appears by his seal.

Coat of Arms.—Ermine, with a black indented chief. Occasionally, a black chevron may be seen on the field. The Judge had two spread eagles on the chief, as indicated by his seal.

Present Representative, George Gent, Esq.

Present Representative, George Gent, Esq.





Vincent of Debden Hall, Baronet 1620.

arms_page088.jpg

The family of Vincent descend from Miles Vincent, owner of lands at Swinford in the county of Leicester, in the tenth of Edward II. Early in the fifteenth century the family removed to Bernack, in the county of Northampton, on marriage with the heiress of Sir John Bernack, of that place. Here they continued to reside, until David Vincent, Esq. seventh in descent from that marriage, settled at Long-Ditton, in Surrey, in the reign of Henry VIII. His son, Sir Thomas Vincent, by marriage with the heiress of Lyfield, removed to Stoke d'Abernon, in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, which was sold shortly after 1809, when the family removed to the present seat in this county.

The family of Vincent descends from Miles Vincent, who owned land in Swinford, Leicestershire, during the reign of Edward II. In the early fifteenth century, the family moved to Bernack in Northamptonshire after marrying the heiress of Sir John Bernack from that area. They lived there until David Vincent, Esq., the seventh generation from that marriage, settled in Long-Ditton, Surrey, during the reign of Henry VIII. His son, Sir Thomas Vincent, married the heiress of Lyfield and moved to Stoke d'Abernon during the reign of Queen Elizabeth. The property was sold shortly after 1809, and the family relocated to their current residence in this county.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 418; and Manning and Bray's Surrey, vol. ii. p. 723.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 418; and Manning and Bray's Surrey, vol. ii. p. 723.

Arms.—Azure, three quatrefoils urgent.

Arms.—Blue, three urgent quatrefoils.

Present Representative, Sir Francis Vincent, 10th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Francis Vincent, 10th Baronet.





GLOUCESTERSHIRE.

Knightly.

Berkeley of Berkeley Castle, Earl of Berkeley 1679; Baron Berkeley 1416.

arms_page089.jpg

Pre-eminent among the Norman aristocracy is the house of Berkeley, and more especially remarkable from being the only family in England in the male line retaining as their residence their ancient Feudal Castle. This great family are descended from Hardinge, who fought with William at the battle of Hastings; and whose son, Robert Fitzhardinge, received the lordship and castle of Berkeley from Henry II., in reward for his fidelity to the Empress Maude and her son. His son and successor Maurice married Alice, daughter of Roger de Berkeley, the former and dispossessed owner of Berkeley.

The leading family among the Norman aristocracy is the house of Berkeley, notable for being the only family in England that still lives in their ancient feudal castle in the male line. This prominent family is descended from Hardinge, who fought alongside William at the Battle of Hastings; his son, Robert Fitzhardinge, was granted the lordship and castle of Berkeley by Henry II in recognition of his loyalty to Empress Maude and her son. Maurice, his son and successor, married Alice, the daughter of Roger de Berkeley, the previous and dispossessed owner of Berkeley.

Younger branches. The Berkeleys of Cotheridge and Spetchley, both in Worcestershire, and both descended from Thomas, fourth son of James fifth Lord Berkeley, and Isabel, daughter of Thomas Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk. (Nash's Worcestershire, i. 258.)

Younger branches. The Berkeleys of Cotheridge and Spetchley, both in Worcestershire, are both descendants of Thomas, the fourth son of James, the fifth Lord Berkeley, and Isabel, the daughter of Thomas Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk. (Nash's Worcestershire, i. 258.)

For Berkeley of Stoke-Gifford in this county, and of Bruton, co. Somerset, (Lords Berkeley of Stratton,) both extinct, see Blore's Rutlandshire, p, 210; for Berkeley of Wymondham, also extinct, see Nichols's Leicestershire, ii. pt. 1. p. 413; for Berkeley-Portman of Bryanston, co. Dorset, see Hutchins's Dorset, i. 154.

For Berkeley of Stoke-Gifford in this county and of Bruton, Somerset (Lords Berkeley of Stratton), both extinct, see Blore's Rutlandshire, p. 210; for Berkeley of Wymondham, also extinct, see Nichols's Leicestershire, ii. pt. 1. p. 413; for Berkeley-Portman of Bryanston, Dorset, see Hutchins's Dorset, i. 154.

For Berkeley Genealogy, see Leland's Itinerary, vi. fo. 49, &c.; for Charters of the Berkeleys, with their seals copied from the originals at Berkeley Castle, see MSS. Reg. Coll. Oxon. cxlix., and, above all, Fosbroke's "Abstracts and Extracts of Smyth's Lives of the Berkeleys," admirably illustrative of the ancient manners of our old landed families.

For Berkeley Genealogy, check Leland's Itinerary, vi. fo. 49, etc.; for Charters of the Berkeleys, with their seals copied from the originals at Berkeley Castle, see MSS. Reg. Coll. Oxon. cxlix., and, most importantly, Fosbroke's "Abstracts and Extracts of Smyth's Lives of the Berkeleys," which wonderfully illustrates the ancient customs of our historical landed families.

Arms.—Gules, a chevron between ten crosses patée argent. The original arms were, Gules, a chevron argent, and were so borne by Moris de Barkele, in the reign of Henry III. The present coat was used by Sir Moris in the reigns of Edward II. and III. and Richard II. His son, during his father's life, differenced his arms by a label azure; Sir Thomas de Berkeley used "rosettes" instead of crosses; Sir John de Berkeley, Gules, a chevron argent between three crosses patée or. (Roll of Edw. II. &c.)

Arms.—Red, a chevron between ten silver crosses. The original arms were Red, a silver chevron, used by Moris de Barkele during Henry III's reign. The current coat was used by Sir Moris during the reigns of Edward II, Edward III, and Richard II. His son, while his father was still living, marked his arms with a blue label; Sir Thomas de Berkeley used "rosettes" instead of crosses; Sir John de Berkeley had Red, a silver chevron between three gold crosses. (Roll of Edw. II. &c.)

See for the differences in the Berkeley coat, Camden's Remains, ed. 1657, p. 226.

See for the differences in the Berkeley coat, Camden's Remains, ed. 1657, p. 226.

Present Representative, Thomas Morton Fitz-Hardinge Berkeley, 6th Earl of Berkeley.

Present Representative, Thomas Morton Fitz-Hardinge Berkeley, 6th Earl of Berkeley.





Gentle.

Kingscote of Kingscote.

arms_page090.jpg

Ansgerus, or Arthur, owner of lands in Combe, in the parish of Wotton under Edge, in this county, the gift of the Empress Maude, is the patriarch of this venerable family. The manor of Kingscote, which had been given by William I. to Roger de Berkeley, was inherited from Aldeva, the daughter of Robert Fitz-Hardinge and the wife of Nigel de Kingscote, soon after the reign of Henry II.

Ansgerus, or Arthur, who owns land in Combe, in the parish of Wotton under Edge in this county, a gift from Empress Maude, is the head of this respected family. The manor of Kingscote, which was given by William I to Roger de Berkeley, was inherited from Aldeva, the daughter of Robert Fitz-Hardinge and the wife of Nigel de Kingscote, shortly after the reign of Henry II.

The Kingscotes shared in the glories of both Poictiers and Agincourt, and, although a family of such long standing in this county, appear never to have exceeded the moderate limits of their present ancestral property.

The Kingscotes were part of the victories at both Poictiers and Agincourt, and even though they've been a long-established family in this county, they never seemed to go beyond the modest scope of their current family estate.

See Atkyns's Gloucestershire, 2nd edit. 1768, p. 258; Rudder's Gloucestershire, p. 512; and Fosbroke's Smyth's Lives of the Berkeleys, p. 218.

See Atkyns's Gloucestershire, 2nd ed. 1768, p. 258; Rudder's Gloucestershire, p. 512; and Fosbroke's Smyth's Lives of the Berkeleys, p. 218.

Arms.—Argent, nine escallops sable, on a canton gules a mullet pierced or.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, nine black scallops, on a red square a gold star with a hole in it.

Present Representative, Thomas Henry Kingscote, Esq.

Present Representative, Thomas Henry Kingscote, Esq.





Trye of Leckhampton-Court.

arms_page091.jpg

This family is traced to Rawlin Try, in the reign of Richard II. He married an heiress of Berkeley, by whom he had the manor of Alkington in Berkeley. His great-grandson was High Sheriff of Gloucestershire in 1447, and married an heiress of Boteler, from whence came the manor of Hardwicke, sold to the Yorkes in the last century. Leckhampton came from the Norwood family in recent times.

This family can be traced back to Rawlin Try during the reign of Richard II. He married an heiress from Berkeley, with whom he acquired the manor of Alkington in Berkeley. His great-grandson served as High Sheriff of Gloucestershire in 1447 and married an heiress from the Boteler family, which led to the manor of Hardwicke, sold to the Yorkes in the last century. Leckhampton was obtained from the Norwood family more recently.

See Atkyns's Gloucestershire, p. 238; and Rudder, p. 471, &c.

See Atkyns's Gloucestershire, p. 238; and Rudder, p. 471, etc.

Arms.—Or, a bend azure. In the Roll of Arms of the Thirteenth Century, printed by the Society of Antiquaries in 1864 [numbers 69 and 70], occur the following coats:

Limbs.—Gold, with a blue diagonal stripe. In the Roll of Arms of the Thirteenth Century, published by the Society of Antiquaries in 1864 [numbers 69 and 70], the following coats appear:

"Signeur de Bilebatia de Try, d'or un bend gobony d'argent et d'azure.
"Regnald de Try, d'or un bend d'azure un labell gulez."

Present Representative, Rev. Charles Brandon Trye.

Present Representative, Rev. Charles Brandon Trye.





Estcourt of Estcourt, in Shipton-Moyne.

arms_page092a.jpg

The printed accounts of this ancient family are somewhat meagre, but original evidences in the possession of the present Mr. Estcourt prove the long continuance of his ancestors as lords of the manor of the place from whence the name is derived, and of which John Estcourt died seised in the fourteenth year of Edward IV. The estate has remained the inheritance of his descendants from that period.

The written records of this old family are rather scarce, but original documents held by the current Mr. Estcourt show that his ancestors were lords of the manor from which the name comes, and that John Estcourt passed away owning it in the fourteenth year of Edward IV's reign. The estate has stayed in his descendants' hands since then.

Walter de la Estcourt is the first recorded ancestor. He held lands in Shipton in 1317, and died about 1325. See Atkyns's Gloucestershire, 2nd ed. p. 340; Rudder, p. 654 and Lee's History of the Parish of Tetbury, p. 196.

Walter de la Estcourt is the first recorded ancestor. He owned land in Shipton in 1317 and died around 1325. See Atkyns's Gloucestershire, 2nd ed. p. 340; Rudder, p. 654 and Lee's History of the Parish of Tetbury, p. 196.

Arms.—Ermine, on a chief indented gules three estoiles or, and so borne by William Estcourt, Warden of New College, Oxford, in 1426, as appears by his silver seal in the possession of Mr. Estcourt.

Coat of Arms.—Ermine, with a notched red chief featuring three gold estoiles, as displayed by William Estcourt, Warden of New College, Oxford, in 1426, as indicated by his silver seal owned by Mr. Estcourt.

Present Representative, The Right Hon. Thomas H. S. Sotheron-Estcourt, late M.P. for North Wilts.

Present Representative, The Right Hon. Thomas H. S. Sotheron-Estcourt, former M.P. for North Wilts.





Leigh of Adlestrop, Baron Leigh of Stoneleigh 1839.

arms_page092b.jpg

Descended from Agnes, daughter and heir of Richard de Legh, and her second husband William Venables, the common ancestress of the Leighs of West-Hall in High-Leigh. (See p. 22.) They had a son who took the name of Legh, and settled at Booths in Cheshire: from hence came the Leighs of Adlington, and from them the Leighs of Lyme, both in Cheshire, and both now extinct. John Leigh, Escheator of Cheshire in the 12th of Henry VI., was a younger son of Sir Peter Leigh, of Lyme, and the ancestor of the Leighs of Ridge, in the same county. Ridge was sold in the fourth of George II., and the family (still I believe existing) removed into Kent.

Descended from Agnes, the daughter and heir of Richard de Legh, and her second husband William Venables, she is the common ancestor of the Leigh family from West-Hall in High-Leigh. (See p. 22.) They had a son who adopted the name Legh and settled at Booths in Cheshire. From this lineage came the Leighs of Adlington, and from them, the Leighs of Lyme, both in Cheshire and now both extinct. John Leigh, Escheator of Cheshire during the 12th year of Henry VI's reign, was a younger son of Sir Peter Leigh of Lyme and the ancestor of the Leighs of Ridge in the same county. Ridge was sold in the fourth year of George II, and the family (still believed to be existing) moved to Kent.

The present family are descended from Sir Thomas Leigh, Knight, Lord Mayor of London in 1558, who was also the ancestor of the extinct house of Stoneleigh. Sir Thomas was great-grandson of Sir Peter Leigh, Knight Banneret, who fell at Agincourt.

The current family is descended from Sir Thomas Leigh, Knight, who served as Lord Mayor of London in 1558, and was also the ancestor of the now-extinct house of Stoneleigh. Sir Thomas was the great-grandson of Sir Peter Leigh, Knight Banneret, who died at Agincourt.

Younger Branches. Leigh of Middleton in Yorkshire, and Egginton in Derbyshire. See also Townley of Townley.

Younger Branches. Leigh of Middleton in Yorkshire, and Egginton in Derbyshire. See also Townley of Townley.

Extinct Branches. Leigh of Rushall, in Staffordshire; see Shaw's Staffordshire, ii. 69; of Brownsover, co. Warwick, Baronet; of Baguly, co. Chester; of Annesley, co. Notts; of Birch, co. Lancaster; of Stockwell, co. Surrey; and of Isall, co. Cumberland, &c.

Extinct Branches. Leigh of Rushall, in Staffordshire; see Shaw's Staffordshire, ii. 69; of Brownsover, Warwickshire, Baronet; of Baguly, Cheshire; of Annesley, Nottinghamshire; of Birch, Lancashire; of Stockwell, Surrey; and of Isall, Cumberland, &c.

So various indeed are the ramifications of the different branches of this wide-spreading family, that "as many Leighs as fleas" has grown into a proverb in Cheshire.

So many branches of this large family exist that the saying "as many Leighs as fleas" has become a proverb in Cheshire.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, i. 350; iii. 333, 338, 374.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, i. 350; iii. 333, 338, 374.

Arms.—Gules, a cross engrailed, and in the dexter point a fusil argent.

Coat of Arms.—Red with a notched cross, and a silver diamond shape in the top right corner.

Present Representative, William Henry Leigh, 2nd Baron Leigh.

Present Representative, William Henry Leigh, 2nd Baron Leigh.





HEREFORDSHIRE.

Knightly.

Bodenham of Rotherwas.

arms_page094.jpg

Hugh de Bodenham, Lord of Bodenham, in this county, grandfather of Roger who lived in the reign of Henry III., is the ancestor of this family; who were afterwards of Monington and of Rotherwas, about the middle of the fifteenth century.

Hugh de Bodenham, Lord of Bodenham in this county, was the grandfather of Roger, who lived during the reign of Henry III. He is the ancestor of this family, which later settled in Monington and Rotherwas around the middle of the fifteenth century.

See Blore's Rutlandshire for Bodenham of Ryhall, in that county, now extinct, (p. 49,) and Duncomb's Herefordshire, i. 91, 104.

See Blore's Rutlandshire for Bodenham of Ryhall, in that county, now extinct, (p. 49,) and Duncomb's Herefordshire, i. 91, 104.

Arms.—Azure, a fess between three chess-rooks or.

Coat of Arms.—Blue background, with a horizontal band featuring three gold chess rooks.

Present Representative, Charles De la Barre Bodenham, Esq.

Present Representative, Charles De la Barre Bodenham, Esq.





Scudamore of Kentchurch.

arms_page095.jpg

This is the only remaining branch of an ancient Norman family formerly seated at Upton and Norton near Warminster, in Wiltshire; Walter de Scudamore being lord of the former manor in the reign of Stephen. In that of Edward III. Thomas, younger son of Sir Peter Scudamore, of Upton-Scudamore, having married the heiress of Ewias, removed into Herefordshire, and was the ancestor of the family long seated at Holme-Lacy, created Viscounts Scudamore in 1628, and extinct in 1716. From him also descended the house of Kentchurch, who are said to have been seated there in the reign of Edward IV.

This is the only surviving branch of an ancient Norman family that used to be based in Upton and Norton near Warminster, in Wiltshire. Walter de Scudamore was the lord of the former manor during the reign of Stephen. In the time of Edward III, Thomas, the younger son of Sir Peter Scudamore from Upton-Scudamore, married the heiress of Ewias and moved to Herefordshire. He became the ancestor of the family that was long established at Holme-Lacy, which was made Viscounts Scudamore in 1628 and became extinct in 1716. From him also descended the house of Kentchurch, which is said to have been established there during the reign of Edward IV.

See Gibson's Views of the Churches of Door, Holme-Lacy, and Hemsted, &c. 4to. 1727; and Guillim's Heraldry, ed. 1724, p. 549.

See Gibson's Views of the Churches of Door, Holme-Lacy, and Hemsted, &c. 4to. 1727; and Guillim's Heraldry, ed. 1724, p. 549.

Arms.—Gules, three stirrups, leathered and buckled, or. Ancient coat, Or, a cross patée fitchée gules.

Coat of Arms.—Red, with three leather-covered and buckled gold stirrups. Ancient coat, Gold, featuring a red cross with a pointed end.

Present Representative, John Lucy Scudamore, Esq.

Present Representative, John Lucy Scudamore, Esq.





Gentle.

Luttley of Brockhampton (called Barneby).

arms_page096.jpg

Luttley is in the parish of Enfield, in the county of Stafford, and Philip de Luttley was lord thereof in the 20th of Edward I. He was the ancestor of a family the direct line of which terminated in an heiress in the reign of Henry VI. But Adam de Luttley, younger brother of Philip above-named, was grandfather of Sir William Luttley, Knight, of Munslow Hall, co. Salop, whose lineal descendant, John Luttley, Esq. was of Bromcroft Castle, in the same county, 1623. Philip Luttley, Esq. of Lawton Hall, co. Salop, great-grandson of John last-named, married Penelope, only daughter of Richard Barneby, Esq. of Brockhampton; and their son, Bartholomew, succeeding to the Barneby estates, assumed that name; and was grandfather of the late John Barneby, Esq. M. P. for the county of Worcester.

Luttley is in the parish of Enfield, in Staffordshire, and Philip de Luttley was the lord there in the 20th year of Edward I's reign. He was the ancestor of a family whose direct line ended with an heiress during the reign of Henry VI. However, Adam de Luttley, the younger brother of Philip mentioned above, was the grandfather of Sir William Luttley, Knight, of Munslow Hall, Shropshire, whose direct descendant, John Luttley, Esq., lived at Bromcroft Castle in the same county in 1623. Philip Luttley, Esq. of Lawton Hall, Shropshire, the great-grandson of the last John named, married Penelope, the only daughter of Richard Barneby, Esq. of Brockhampton. Their son, Bartholomew, inherited the Barneby estates and took on that name; he was the grandfather of the late John Barneby, Esq., Member of Parliament for Worcestershire.

From the MSS. of Mr. Joseph Morris of Shrewsbury.

From the manuscripts of Mr. Joseph Morris of Shrewsbury.

Arms.—Quarterly or and azure, four lions rampant counterchanged.

Coat of Arms.—Quarterly, gold and blue, featuring four lions standing on their hind legs, alternating in color.

Present Representative, John Habington Barneby, Esq.

Present Representative, John Habington Barneby, Esq.





Berington of Winsley.

arms_page097.jpg

The name is derived from Berington, in the hundred of Condover, and county of Salop, where Thomas and Roger de Berington were living in the reigns of Edward I. and II. Another Thomas, living in the time of Edward III., married Alice, daughter of Sir John Draycot, Knight, and was ancestor of John Berington, of Stoke-Lacy, in this county, who, about the reign of Henry VII. married Eleanor, daughter and heir of Rowland Winsley, of Winsley, Esq. From this marriage the present Mr. Berington is tenth in descent.

The name comes from Berington, in the hundred of Condover, and county of Shropshire, where Thomas and Roger de Berington lived during the reigns of Edward I and II. Another Thomas, living in the time of Edward III, married Alice, the daughter of Sir John Draycot, Knight, and was the ancestor of John Berington from Stoke-Lacy in this county, who, around the time of Henry VII, married Eleanor, the daughter and heir of Rowland Winsley, Esq. The current Mr. Berington is the tenth in descent from this marriage.

From Roger de Berington, brother of Thomas first-named, the Beringtons of Shrewsbury and of Moat Hall, co. Salop, traced their descent. Thomas Berington, of Moat Hall, Esq. who died in 1719, married Anne, daughter of John Berington, of Winsley, Esq.; and the last heir male of their descendants, Philip Berington, Esq. dying s.p. in 1803, devised his Shropshire estates to his kinsman, Mr. Berington, of Winsley.

From Roger de Berington, brother of Thomas, the Beringtons of Shrewsbury and Moat Hall, co. Salop, traced their lineage. Thomas Berington, of Moat Hall, Esq., who passed away in 1719, married Anne, the daughter of John Berington, of Winsley, Esq.; and the last male heir of their line, Philip Berington, Esq., died without children in 1803, leaving his Shropshire estates to his relative, Mr. Berington, of Winsley.

From the MSS. of Mr. Joseph Morris, of Shrewsbury, and Eyton's Shropshire, vi. p. 42.

From the manuscripts of Mr. Joseph Morris from Shrewsbury, and Eyton's Shropshire, vi. p. 42.

Arms.—Sable, three greyhounds courant in pale argent, collared gules, within a border of the last.

Coat of Arms.—Black background, featuring three greyhounds running in a vertical line, silver-colored, with red collars, enclosed by a red border.

Present Representative, John Berington, Esq.

Present Representative, John Berington, Esq.





HERTFORDSHIRE.

Knightly.

Jocelyn, of Hyde Hall, in the parish of Sabridgeworth, Earl of Roden in Ireland 1771; Irish Baron 1743; Baronet 1665.

arms_page098.jpg

A family of Norman origin, said to have come into England with William the Conqueror, and to have been seated at Sempringham, in the county of Lincoln, by the grant of that monarch. In 1249 Thomas Jocelyn, son of John, having married Maud, daughter and coheir of Sir John Hyde, of Hyde, brought that manor and lordship into this family, in which it has ever since continued. The peerage was originally conferred on Robert Jocelyn, Lord Chancellor of Ireland in 1739, created Baron Newport 1743, whose son, the first Earl, married the heiress of the Hamiltons, Earls of Clanbrassil, in 1752.

A family of Norman descent, believed to have arrived in England with William the Conqueror, established themselves at Sempringham in Lincolnshire through the king’s grant. In 1249, Thomas Jocelyn, son of John, married Maud, daughter and co-heir of Sir John Hyde of Hyde, and brought that manor and lordship into the family, which has owned it ever since. The peerage was first given to Robert Jocelyn, the Lord Chancellor of Ireland in 1739, who was made Baron Newport in 1743. His son, the first Earl, married the heiress of the Hamiltons, Earls of Clanbrassil, in 1752.

See "Historical Anecdotes of the Families of the Boleyns, Careys, Mordaunts, Hamiltons, and Jocelyns, arranged as an Elucidation of the Genealogical Chart at Tollymore Park," Newry, 1839, privately printed. See also Archdall's Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, iii. 258, and Chauncy's Hertfordshire, 1st ed. p. 182.

See "Historical Anecdotes of the Families of the Boleyns, Careys, Mordaunts, Hamiltons, and Jocelyns, arranged as a Clarification of the Genealogical Chart at Tollymore Park," Newry, 1839, privately printed. Also, check Archdall's Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, iii. 258, and Chauncy's Hertfordshire, 1st ed. p. 182.

Arms.—Azure, a circular wreath argent and sable, with four hawk's bells joined thereto in quadrature or.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, featuring a circular wreath in silver and black, with four hawk's bells arranged in a square pattern of gold.

Present Representative, Robert Jocelyn, third Earl of Roden, K.P.

Present Representative, Robert Jocelyn, third Earl of Roden, K.P.





Wolryche of Croxley.

arms_page099.jpg

This is a very ancient Shropshire family, descended from Sir Adam Wolryche, Knight, of Wenlock, living in the reign of Henry III., and who, previous to being knighted, was admitted of the Roll of Guild Merchants of the town of Shrewsbury in 1231, by the old Saxon name of "Adam Wulfric." His descendant Andrew Wolryche was M. P. for Bridgnorth in 1435, being then of Dudmaston, where the elder branch of this family was seated for a considerable period, created Baronets in 1641, extinct in 1723. The present family descend from Edward, third son of Humphry Wolryche, Esq. grandson of Andrew Wolryche, which Humphry is recorded as one of the "Gentlemen" of Shropshire, in the seventeenth of Henry VII., 1501. There were branches of the family, now extinct, at Cowling and Wickhambroke, Suffolk, and Alconbury, Huntingdonshire.

This is a very old Shropshire family, descended from Sir Adam Wolryche, Knight, of Wenlock, who lived during the reign of Henry III. Before being knighted, he was listed as a member of the Guild Merchants of the town of Shrewsbury in 1231 under the old Saxon name "Adam Wulfric." His descendant Andrew Wolryche was the Member of Parliament for Bridgnorth in 1435, at that time residing in Dudmaston, where the older branch of this family was established for a significant period and was created Baronet in 1641, becoming extinct in 1723. The current family descends from Edward, the third son of Humphry Wolryche, Esq., who was a grandson of Andrew Wolryche. Humphry is noted as one of the "Gentlemen" of Shropshire in the seventeenth year of Henry VII, 1501. There were branches of the family, now extinct, at Cowling and Wickhambroke in Suffolk, and Alconbury in Huntingdonshire.

From the MSS. of Mr. Joseph Morris, of Shrewsbury.

From the manuscripts of Mr. Joseph Morris, of Shrewsbury.

Arms.—Azure, a chevron between three swans argent.

Coat of Arms.—Blue background with a chevron and three white swans.

Present Representative, Humphry William Wolryche, Esq.

Present Representative, Humphry William Wolryche, Esq.





HUNTINGDONSHIRE.

Knightly.

Sherard of Glatton, Baron Sherard in Ireland 1627.

arms_page100.jpg

The pedigree of this family does not appear to be proved beyond William Sherard, who died in 1304. His ancestors, however, are said to have been of Thornton, in Cheshire, in the thirteenth century. In 1402 the family were established at Stapleford in Leicestershire by marriage with the heiress of Hawberk.

The family lineage doesn't seem to be confirmed beyond William Sherard, who passed away in 1304. However, it's said that his ancestors were from Thornton in Cheshire during the thirteenth century. In 1402, the family settled in Stapleford, Leicestershire, through a marriage with the heiress of Hawberk.

On the decease of Robert Sherard, sixth Earl of Harborough, in 1859, the representation of the family devolved upon the present lord, descended from George, third son of the first Baron.

On the death of Robert Sherard, sixth Earl of Harborough, in 1859, the representation of the family passed to the current lord, who is a descendant of George, the third son of the first Baron.

See Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. ii. pt. i. 343; and Brydges's Collins, iv. 180,

See Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. ii. pt. i. 343; and Brydges's Collins, iv. 180,

An extinct younger branch was of Lopthorne, in the county of Leicester.

An extinct younger branch was of Lopthorne, in the county of Leicester.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron gules between three torteauxes.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, with a red chevron between three red circles.

Present Representative, Philip Castell Sherard, 9th Baron Sherard.

Present Representative, Philip Castell Sherard, 9th Baron Sherard.





KENT

Knightly.

Dering of Surenden-Dering, Baronet 1626.

arms_page101.jpg

The family of Dering descend from Norman de Morinis, whose ancestor, Vitalis FitzOsbert, lived in the reign of Henry II. Norman de Morinis married the daughter of Deringus, descended from Norman Fitz-Dering, Sheriff of this county in King Stephen's reign. Richard Dering died seised of Surenden, which came from the heiress of Haute, in 1480. The loyalty of Sir Edward Dering in the Civil Wars, in Charles I.'s time, deserves to be remembered: see his character in Peck's Desiderata Curiosa, II. B. 14, 19, 20, and the interesting memoir of him by John Bruce, Esq. F.S.A. in "Proceedings in the County of Kent," printed for the Camden Society 1861.

The Dering family descends from Norman de Morinis, whose ancestor, Vitalis FitzOsbert, lived during the reign of Henry II. Norman de Morinis married the daughter of Deringus, who was a descendant of Norman Fitz-Dering, the Sheriff of this county in King Stephen's reign. Richard Dering passed away in possession of Surenden, acquired from the heiress of Haute, in 1480. The loyalty of Sir Edward Dering during the Civil Wars in the time of Charles I is noteworthy: see his character in Peck's Desiderata Curiosa, II. B. 14, 19, 20, and the intriguing memoir about him by John Bruce, Esq. F.S.A. in "Proceedings in the County of Kent," published for the Camden Society in 1861.

For a notice of the old seats of this family, in the parish of Lidd, called Dengemarsh Place and Westbrooke, see Hasted's History of Kent, iii. 515, and for the family, iii. 228; and Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 13,

For information about the old seats of this family in the parish of Lidd, known as Dengemarsh Place and Westbrooke, check out Hasted's History of Kent, iii. 515, and for details about the family, see iii. 228; also refer to Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 13,

Arms.—Argent, a fess azure, in chief three torteauxes, borne by "Richard fil' Deringi de Haut," in 19 Hen. IV. as appears by his seal. The same coat is on the roof of the cloisters of Canterbury Cathedral. The son of this Sir Richard Dering bore, Or, a saltier sable, the ancient arms of De Morinis, and now generally quartered with Dering. See Willement's Heraldic Notices of Canterbury Cathedral, pp. 90, 106.

Coat of Arms.—Silver with a blue horizontal stripe and three red roundels above, used by "Richard, son of Dering of Haut," in the 19th year of Henry IV, as shown by his seal. The same coat appears on the roof of the cloisters at Canterbury Cathedral. The son of this Sir Richard Dering displayed Gold with a black saltire, the ancient arms of De Morinis, which is now commonly combined with Dering. See Willement's Heraldic Notices of Canterbury Cathedral, pp. 90, 106.

Present Representative, Sir Edward C. Dering, 8th Baronet, M.P. for East Kent.

Present Representative, Sir Edward C. Dering, 8th Baronet, M.P. for East Kent.





Neville of Birling, Earl of Abergavenny 1784; Baron 1392.

arms_page102.jpg

"In point of antiquity, and former feudal power, probably the most illustrious house in the peerage," says Brydges. Descended from Gospatric, the Saxon Earl of Northumberland, whose great-grandson, marrying the heiress of Neville, gave that name to his posterity, for many ages the Nevilles were Barons of Raby and Earls of Westmerland. The last Earl was attainted in the 13th of Elizabeth. A younger branch of the Nevilles, in the person of Sir Edward Neville, obtained the castle and barony of Abergavenny, and the estate of Birling, with the heiress of Beauchamp, in the reign of Henry VI.; and the present family is descended from this match, having been Barons of Abergavenny previously to the creation of the Earldom. Birling was long deserted by the family, whose principal seat was afterwards at Sheffield, and Eridge, in Sussex; but it is now the residence of Lord Abergavenny.

"In terms of age and past feudal power, probably the most notable house in the peerage," says Brydges. They descended from Gospatric, the Saxon Earl of Northumberland, whose great-grandson married the heiress of Neville, passing that name to his descendants. For many years, the Nevilles were Barons of Raby and Earls of Westmorland. The last Earl was stripped of his title in the 13th year of Elizabeth's reign. A younger branch of the Nevilles, represented by Sir Edward Neville, acquired the castle and barony of Abergavenny, along with the estate of Birling, by marrying the heiress of Beauchamp during the reign of Henry VI.; the current family is descended from this union, having been Barons of Abergavenny before the Earldom was created. Birling was long abandoned by the family, whose main residence later became Sheffield and Eridge, in Sussex; but it is now the home of Lord Abergavenny.

See Hasted, ii. 200; Brydges's Collins, v. 151; and Surtees's Durham, iv. 158, for pedigrees of the Nevilles, Earls of Westmerland, and the Nevilles of Weardale and Thornton-Bridge. See also Rowland's "Account of the Noble Family of Neville," privately printed 1830, folio; Surtees's "Sketch of the Stock of Nevill," 8vo. 1843.

See Hasted, vol. 2, page 200; Brydges's Collins, vol. 5, page 151; and Surtees's Durham, vol. 4, page 158, for family trees of the Nevilles, Earls of Westmorland, and the Nevilles of Weardale and Thornton-Bridge. Also, check out Rowland's "Account of the Noble Family of Neville," privately published in 1830, folio; Surtees's "Sketch of the Stock of Nevill," 8vo, 1843.

Arms.—Gules, a saltier argent, thereon a rose of the first, seeded proper.

Coat of Arms.—Red, with a silver diagonal cross, over which is a rose of the same color, naturally grown.

This coat, without the rose, was borne by Robert de Neville in the reign of Henry III. In the reign of Edward III. M. de Neville de Hornby bore the coat reversed, Argent, a saltier gules. M. Alexander de Neville, at the same period, differenced it by a martlet sable. M. William Neville and N. Thomas Neville bore for difference respectively, a fleur-de-lis azure and a martlet gules, in the reign of Richard II. (Rolls.) The Rose is allusive to the House of Lancaster, Ralph Neville, 1st Earl of Westmerland, having married to his second wife Joan, daughter of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster. The older coat was, Or, fretty gules, on a canton sable an ancient ship.

This coat, without the rose, was worn by Robert de Neville during the reign of Henry III. In the reign of Edward III, M. de Neville de Hornby displayed the coat in reverse, Argent, a saltier gules. M. Alexander de Neville, around the same time, added a difference of a martlet sable. M. William Neville and N. Thomas Neville used respective differences of a fleur-de-lis azure and a martlet gules during the reign of Richard II. (Rolls.) The rose refers to the House of Lancaster, as Ralph Neville, 1st Earl of Westmerland, married his second wife Joan, the daughter of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster. The earlier coat was Or, fretty gules, on a canton sable an ancient ship.

Present Representative, the Rev. William Neville, 4th Earl of Abergavenny.

Present Representative, the Rev. William Neville, 4th Earl of Abergavenny.





Gentle.

Honywood of Evington, in Elmsted, Baronet 1660.

arms_page103.jpg

The name is derived from Henewood, near Postling, in this county, where the ancestors of this family resided as early as the reign of Henry III. In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries the Honywoods removed to Hythe, which they often represented in Parliament, and afterwards to Sene, in Newington, near Hythe. Caseborne, in Cheriton, came from an heiress of that name before the time of Henry VI.; Evington, by purchase, in the reign of Henry VII.

The name comes from Henewood, near Postling, in this county, where this family's ancestors lived as early as the reign of Henry III. In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, the Honywoods moved to Hythe, which they frequently represented in Parliament, and later to Sene, in Newington, near Hythe. Caseborne, in Cheriton, came from an heiress of that name before the time of Henry VI.; Evington was acquired by purchase during the reign of Henry VII.

Younger branches were of Marks Hall, in Essex, and of Petts, in Charing, in this county. Of the former family was Robert Honywood, whose wife Mary, daughter of Robert Atwaters, or Waters, lived to see 367 descendants: she died in 1620, aged 93.

Younger branches came from Marks Hall in Essex and Petts in Charing, in this county. From the former family was Robert Honywood, whose wife Mary, daughter of Robert Atwaters or Waters, lived to see 367 descendants. She died in 1620 at the age of 93.

See Topographer and Genealogist, i. 397, 568; ii. 169, 189, 256, 312, 433; Hasted's Kent, ii. 442, 449; iii. 308; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 105.

See Topographer and Genealogist, i. 397, 568; ii. 169, 189, 256, 312, 433; Hasted's Kent, ii. 442, 449; iii. 308; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 105.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three hawk's heads erased azure. These arms, of the time of Richard II. are carved on the cloisters of Canterbury Cathedral. See Willement, p. 101.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a chevron between three blue hawk's heads severed at the neck. These arms date back to the time of Richard II and are engraved on the cloisters of Canterbury Cathedral. See Willement, p. 101.

Present Representative, Sir Courtenay John Honywood, 7th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Courtenay John Honywood, 7th Baronet.





Twysden of Roydon-Hall, in East Peckham, Baronet 1611.

arms_page104.jpg

Twysden, in the parish of Goudhurst, appears to have given name to this family: it was possessed by Adam de Twysden in the reign of Edward I.; and in that of Henry IV. Roger Twysden, his descendant, married the daughter and heir of Thomas Chelmington of Chelmington, in Great Chart, Esq. where his son Roger removed. Twysden was sold in the reign of Henry VI. In the reign of Elizabeth, William Twysden, of Chelmington, married Elizabeth, daughter of Thomas Roydon, of Roydon-Hall, which has since been the residence of his descendants. There is another Twysden, in the parish of Sandhurst, in this county, where the family are also said to have lived in the time of Edward I.

Twysden, in the Goudhurst area, seems to have given its name to this family. Adam de Twysden owned it during the reign of Edward I. Later, in the time of Henry IV, his descendant Roger Twysden married the daughter and heir of Thomas Chelmington from Chelmington in Great Chart, and their son Roger moved there. Twysden was sold during the reign of Henry VI. In Elizabeth's reign, William Twysden from Chelmington married Elizabeth, the daughter of Thomas Roydon from Roydon-Hall, which has since been the home of his descendants. There's another Twysden in the parish of Sandhurst in this county, where the family is also said to have lived during Edward I's time.

A younger branch of Bradbourne, in this county, also Baronets, were extinct in 1841.

A younger branch of Bradbourne in this county, which was also made up of Baronets, went extinct in 1841.

See Hasted's Kent, ii. 213, 275; iii. 37, 244; Philpot's Kent, p. 300; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 211.

See Hasted's Kent, ii. 213, 275; iii. 37, 244; Philpot's Kent, p. 300; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 211.

Arms.—Gyronny of four, argent and gules, a saltier between four crosses crosslet, all counterchanged.

Coat of Arms.—Divided into four sections, silver and red, with a diagonal cross and four small crosses, all with swapped colors.

Present Representative, Sir William Twysden, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir William Twysden, 8th Baronet.





Toke, of Godington.

arms_page105.jpg

This family claim descent from Robert de Toke, who was present with Henry III. at the Battle of Northampton. In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries the Tokes were seated at Bere, in the parish of Westcliffe, in this county: this line became extinct at the latter end of the seventeenth century.

This family claims descent from Robert de Toke, who was present with Henry III at the Battle of Northampton. In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, the Tokes lived in Bere, in the parish of Westcliffe, in this county; this line became extinct towards the end of the seventeenth century.

The Tokes of Godington are a junior branch, descended from the heiress of Goldwell, of Godington, about the reign of Henry VI.

The Tokes of Godington are a junior branch that comes from the heiress of Goldwell, from Godington, around the time of Henry VI's reign.

See Hasted's Kent, iii. 247; Visitations of Kent, 1574 and 1619; and Harleian MSS. 1195. 55, 1196. 108.

See Hasted's Kent, iii. 247; Visitations of Kent, 1574 and 1619; and Harleian MSS. 1195. 55, 1196. 108.

Arms.—Party per chevron sable and argent, three gryphon's heads erased and counterchanged. John Toke, of Godington, had an additional coat, an augmentation granted to him by Henry VII., as a reward for his expedition in a message on which he was employed to the French King: viz. Argent, on a chevron between three greyhound's heads erased sable, collared or, three plates.

Arms.—Divided diagonally black and silver, displaying three gryphon heads severed and switched in color. John Toke, of Godington, was awarded an additional coat of arms by Henry VII as a reward for his mission to the French King: specifically, Silver, with a diagonal band between three black greyhound heads cut off with gold collars, accompanied by three silver discs.

Present Representative, the Rev. Nicholas Toke.

Present Representative, the Rev. Nicholas Toke.





Roper of Linstead, Baron Teynham 1616.

arms_page106.jpg

William Roper, or Rosper, who lived in the reign of Henry III, is the first recorded ancestor; his descendants were of St. Dunstan's, near Canterbury, in the reigns of Edward III. and Richard II. Edmund Roper was one of the Justices of the Peace for this county in the time of Henry IV. and V.

William Roper, or Rosper, who lived during the reign of Henry III, is the first recorded ancestor; his descendants were from St. Dunstan's, near Canterbury, in the reigns of Edward III and Richard II. Edmund Roper was one of the Justices of the Peace for this county during the time of Henry IV and V.

The elder line of this family were seated at West-Hall, in Eltham, and also at St. Dunstan's, and became extinct in 1725. The younger and present branch at Linstead, which came from the heiress of Fineux, in the reign of Henry VIII. King James I. conferred the peerage on Sir John Roper in 1616.

The older branch of this family lived at West-Hall in Eltham and also at St. Dunstan's, but it died out in 1725. The younger and current branch at Linstead, which descended from the heiress of Fineux during the reign of Henry VIII, was granted a peerage by King James I to Sir John Roper in 1616.

For the origin of the family, see Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed. p. 316; Hasted's Kent, i. 55; ii. 687; iii. 589; and Brydges's Collins, vii. 77.

For the origin of the family, see Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed. p. 316; Hasted's Kent, i. 55; ii. 687; iii. 589; and Brydges's Collins, vii. 77.

Arms.—Per fess azure and or, a pale counterchanged, three buck's heads erased of the second.

Coat of Arms.—Divided horizontally, with blue on the top and gold on the bottom, a vertical stripe that alternates colors, displaying three deer heads severed at the neck in gold.

Present Representative, George Henry Roper Curzon, 16th Baron Teynham.

Present Representative, George Henry Roper Curzon, 16th Baron Teynham.





Knatchbull of Mersham-Hatch, Baronet 1641.

arms_page107.jpg

Hasted gives no detailed pedigree of this family before the purchase of the manor and estate of Hatch, by Richard Knatchbull, in the reign of Henry VII. It appears however that the first recorded ancestor, John Knatchbull, held lands in the parish of Limne, in this county, in the reign of Edward III., where some of the name remained in that of Charles I. There are pedigrees in the Visitations of Kent of 1574 and 1619.

Hasted doesn't provide a detailed family background for this family before Richard Knatchbull bought the manor and estate of Hatch during the reign of Henry VII. However, it seems that the first documented ancestor, John Knatchbull, owned land in the parish of Limne in this county during the reign of Edward III. Some members of the family were still there during the time of Charles I. There are family trees in the Visitations of Kent from 1574 and 1619.

See Philpot's Kent, p.199; Hasted's Kent, iii. 286; and Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 228.

See Philpot's Kent, p.199; Hasted's Kent, iii. 286; and Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 228.

Arms.—Azure, three cross-crosslets fitchée in bend or, cotised of the same.

Arms.—Blue background with three gold cross-crosslets that have pointed ends arranged diagonally, outlined in gold.

Present Representative, Sir Norton Joseph Knatchbull, 10th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Norton Joseph Knatchbull, 10th Baronet.





Filmer of East-Sutton, Baronet 1674.

arms_page108.jpg

The Filmers were anciently seated at the manor of Herst, in the parish of Otterden, in this county, in the reign of Edward II., and there remained till the time of Elizabeth, when Robert Filmer, son of James, removed to Little-Charleton, in East-Sutton: the manor was purchased by his elder son. There are pedigrees of Filmer in the Kentish Visitations of 1574 and 1619. The Baronetcy was conferred by Charles II., as a reward for the loyal exertions of Sir Robert Filmer during the Usurpation.

The Filmers were historically established at the manor of Herst, in the parish of Otterden, in this county, during the reign of Edward II, and stayed there until the time of Elizabeth. At that point, Robert Filmer, son of James, moved to Little Charleton in East Sutton; the manor was bought by his older son. There are family trees of the Filmer family in the Kentish Visitations of 1574 and 1619. The Baronetcy was granted by Charles II as a reward for the loyal efforts of Sir Robert Filmer during the Usurpation.

See Hasted's Kent, ii. 410; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 581. Arms.—Sable three bars, and in chief three cinquefoils or.

See Hasted's Kent, ii. 410; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 581. Limbs.—Black with three horizontal stripes, and at the top three gold cinquefoils.

Present Representative, Sir Edmund Filmer, 9th Baronet, late M.P. for West Kent.

Present Representative, Sir Edmund Filmer, 9th Baronet, former M.P. for West Kent.





Oxenden of Dene, Baronet 1678.

arms_page109a.jpg

Solomon Oxenden, who lived in the reign of Edward III., is the first known ancestor. Dene, in the parish of Wingham, was purchased at the latter part of the reign of Henry VI. The family had previously been stated at Brook, in the same parish. Thomas Oxenden died seised of Dene in 1492. There is a pedigree in the Visitation of Kent in 1619.

Solomon Oxenden, who lived during the reign of Edward III, is the first known ancestor. Dene, located in the parish of Wingham, was bought towards the end of Henry VI's reign. The family had previously lived at Brook, in the same parish. Thomas Oxenden died owning Dene in 1492. There is a family tree in the Visitation of Kent from 1619.

See Hasted's Kent, iii. 696; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 638.

See Hasted's Kent, iii. 696; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 638.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron gules between three oxen sable. Confirmed in the 24th of Henry VI.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a red chevron between three black oxen. Confirmed in the 24th year of Henry VI.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Chudleigh Oxenden, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Chudleigh Oxenden, 8th Baronet.





Finch of Eastwell, Earl of Winchilsea and Nottingham 1628-1681.

arms_page109b.jpg

"The name of the Finches," writes Leland, "hath bene of ancient tyme in estimation in Southsex about Winchelesey, and by all likelyhod rose by sum notable merchaunte of Winchelesey." The name is said to be derived from the manor of Finches in the parish of Kidd.

"The name of the Finches," writes Leland, "has been held in high regard in Sussex around Winchelsea since ancient times, and likely originated from some notable merchant of Winchelsea." The name is believed to come from the manor of Finches in the parish of Kidd.

Vincent Herbert, alias Finch, married Joan, daughter and heir of Robert de Pitlesden, of Tenderden. His son was of Netherfield, in Sussex, in the reign of Richard II. and Henry IV.; and was the ancestor of this family, who were of the Moat, near Canterbury, by marriage with the heiress of Belknap before 1493. Eastwell came by the coheiress of Moyle about the reign of Elizabeth.

Vincent Herbert, also known as Finch, married Joan, the daughter and heir of Robert de Pitlesden from Tenderden. His son lived in Netherfield, Sussex, during the reigns of Richard II and Henry IV and was the ancestor of this family, who settled at the Moat near Canterbury through marriage with the heiress of Belknap before 1493. Eastwell was acquired via the coheiress of Moyle around the time of Elizabeth's reign.

The heiress of Heneage, who married Sir Moyle Finch, was created Countess of Winchilsea in 1628. The Earldom of Nottingham is due to the law, being granted in 1681 to Heneage, grandson of the first Countess.

The heiress of Heneage, who married Sir Moyle Finch, became the Countess of Winchilsea in 1628. The Earldom of Nottingham was established by law and was granted in 1681 to Heneage, the grandson of the first Countess.

Younger Branch. Earl of Aylesford 1714.

Younger Branch. Earl of Aylesford 1714.

From John, second son of the second Vincent Finch, of Netherfield, were descended the Finches of Sewards, Norton, Kingsdown, Feversham, Wye, and other places in this county.

From John, the second son of the second Vincent Finch of Netherfield, came the Finches of Sewards, Norton, Kingsdown, Feversham, Wye, and other areas in this county.

See Leland's Itinerary, vi. fol. 59; Basted's Kent. iii. 198; and Brydges's Collins, iii. 371.

See Leland's Itinerary, vi. fol. 59; Basted's Kent. iii. 198; and Brydges's Collins, iii. 371.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three gryphons sable.

Arms.—Silver, with a chevron between three black gryphons.

Present Representative, George James Finch Hatton, 10th Earl of Winchilsea, and 7th Earl of Nottingham.

Present Representative, George James Finch Hatton, 10th Earl of Winchilsea, and 7th Earl of Nottingham.





LANCASHIRE.

Knightly.

Pennington of Pennington, Baron Muncaster in Ireland 1676.

arms_page111.jpg

Gamel de Pennington, ancestor of this ancient family, was seated at Pennington at the period of the Conquest. But, as early as the reign of Henry II., Muncaster, in Cumberland, belonged to the Penningtons, and afterwards became their residence; and here King Henry VI. was concealed by Sir John Pennington in his flight from his enemies. There is a tradition that, on quitting Muncaster, the king presented his host with a small glass vessel, still possessed by the family, and called "The Luck of Muncaster:" to the preservation of which a considerable degree of superstition was attached.

Gamel de Pennington, the ancestor of this old family, was living at Pennington during the time of the Conquest. However, as early as the reign of Henry II, Muncaster in Cumberland was owned by the Penningtons and later became their home; it was here that King Henry VI was hidden by Sir John Pennington while escaping from his enemies. There’s a tale that when leaving Muncaster, the king gave his host a small glass vessel, which the family still has today, known as "The Luck of Muncaster;" a significant amount of superstition was associated with its preservation.

See Baines's History of the County of Lancaster, iv. 669; Lysons's Cumberland, 139; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 602.

See Baines's History of the County of Lancaster, iv. 669; Lysons's Cumberland, 139; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 602.

Arms.—Or, five fusils in fess azure.

Coat of Arms.—Gold background with five blue fusils arranged in a horizontal line.

Present Representative, Josslyn Francis Pennington, 5th Baron Muncaster.

Present Representative, Josslyn Francis Pennington, 5th Baron Muncaster.





Molyneux of Sefton, Earl of Sefton in Ireland 1771 Viscount Molyneux in Ireland 1628; Baron Sefton 1831; Baronet 1611.

arms_page112.jpg

An ancient Norman family, who have been possessed of the manor of Sefton, in this county, from the period of the Conquest, or very soon afterwards: it was held as a knight's fee, as of the Castle of Lancaster.

An old Norman family has owned the manor of Sefton in this county since the time of the Conquest, or shortly afterward. It was held as a knight's fee, as part of the Castle of Lancaster.

William de Molines is the first recorded ancestor, and from him the pedigree is very regularly deduced to the present day. This truly noble family have been greatly distinguished in the field, witness Agincourt and Flodden. Thrice has the honour of the banner been conferred on a Molyneux. The second occasion was in Spain in 1367, from the hands of the Black Prince himself. In the seventeenth century, the family proved themselves right loyal to the crown, and suffered accordingly.

William de Molines is the first documented ancestor, and from him the family lineage is clearly traced to the present day. This truly noble family has achieved significant recognition in battles, as seen at Agincourt and Flodden. The honor of carrying the banner has been awarded to a Molyneux three times. The second time was in Spain in 1367, directly from the Black Prince himself. In the seventeenth century, the family demonstrated their loyalty to the crown and faced the consequences.

Sir Archdall's Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, iii. 239; Brydges's Biographical Peerage, iv. 93; and Baines's Lancashire, iv. 276.

Sir Archdall's Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, iii. 239; Brydges's Biographical Peerage, iv. 93; and Baines's Lancashire, iv. 276.

Younger Branch. Molyneux, of Castle Dillon, co. Armagh, Baronet 1730, descended from Thomas Molyneux, born at Calais in 1531, for whom see "An Account of the Family and Descendants of Sir Thomas Molyneux, Knight, Chancellor of the Exchequer in Ireland to Queen Elizabeth." Evesham, sm. 4to. 1820.

Younger Branch. Molyneux, of Castle Dillon, County Armagh, Baronet 1730, descended from Thomas Molyneux, born in Calais in 1531. For more information, see "An Account of the Family and Descendants of Sir Thomas Molyneux, Knight, Chancellor of the Exchequer in Ireland to Queen Elizabeth." Evesham, sm. 4to. 1820.

For Molyneux of Teversal, co. Notts, Baronet 1611, extinct 1812, descended from the second son of Sir Richard Molyneux, the hero of Agincourt, see Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, p. 269; and Wotton's Baronetage, i. 141.

For Molyneux of Teversal, Nottinghamshire, Baronet 1611, extinct 1812, descended from the second son of Sir Richard Molyneux, the hero of Agincourt, see Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, p. 269; and Wotton's Baronetage, i. 141.

Arms.—Azure, a cross moline or. The Irish branch bears a fleur-de-lis or in the dexter quarter.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, featuring a gold cross with split ends. The Irish branch shows a gold fleur-de-lis in the right quarter.

Present Representative, William Philip Molyneux, 4th Earl of Sefton.

Present Representative, William Philip Molyneux, 4th Earl of Sefton.





Hoghton of Hoghton-Tower, Baronet 1611.

arms_page113.jpg

Hocton, or Hoghton, appears to have been granted in marriage by Warin Bussel to one Hamon, called "Pincerna," whose grandson was the first "Adam de Hocton," who held one carucate of land in Hocton in the reign of Henry II. His grandson, Sir Adam de Hoghton, lived in the 50th of Henry III., and was the ancestor of this family.

Hocton, or Hoghton, seems to have been given in marriage by Warin Bussel to a man named Hamon, referred to as "Pincerna," whose grandson was the first "Adam de Hocton," who owned one carucate of land in Hocton during the reign of Henry II. His grandson, Sir Adam de Hoghton, lived during the 50th year of Henry III., and was the ancestor of this family.

See Baines's Lancashire, iii. 348 and 459, for an interesting account of Hoghton-Tower, long deserted by the family; and Wotton's Baronetage, i. 15.

See Baines's Lancashire, iii. 348 and 459, for an interesting account of Hoghton Tower, which has been long abandoned by the family; and Wotton's Baronetage, i. 15.

Arms.—Sable, three bars argent: borne in the reign of Richard II. by Mons. Ric. de Hoghton. His son (?) Richard, the same, with a label of three points gules. (Rolls.)

Coat of Arms.—Black, with three silver bars: used during Richard II's reign. by Mr. Ric. de Hoghton. His son (?) Richard, the same, with a red label of three points. (Rolls.)

Present Representative, Sir Henry Hoghton, 9th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Hoghton, 9th Baronet.





Clifton of Clifton.

arms_page114.jpg

Clifton is in the parish of Kirkham, and here William de Clifton held ten carucates of land in the 42nd year of Henry III., and was Collector of Aids for this county. His son Gilbert, Lord of Clifton, died in the seventeenth of Edward II. On the death of Cuthbert Clifton, in 1512, the manor was temporarily alienated from the male line by an heiress; but by a match with the coheiress of Halsall, before 1657, it again became the property of the then principal branch of this ancient family, who were originally a junior line descended from the Cliftons of Westby.

Clifton is in the parish of Kirkham, where William de Clifton owned ten carucates of land in the 42nd year of Henry III, and served as Collector of Aids for this county. His son Gilbert, Lord of Clifton, passed away in the seventeenth year of Edward II. After Cuthbert Clifton died in 1512, the manor was briefly transferred away from the male line through an heiress; however, through a marriage with the coheiress of Halsall before 1657, it returned to the principal branch of this ancient family, which was originally a junior line descended from the Cliftons of Westby.

See Baines's Lancashire, iv. 404.

See Baines's Lancashire, vol. 4, p. 404.

Arms.—Sable, on a bend argent three mullets pierced gules: borne in the reigns of Edward III. and Richard II. by Mons. Robert de Clyfton. (Rolls.)

Coat of Arms.—Black, with a silver diagonal stripe and three red stars: used during the reigns of Edward III and Richard II by Mr. Robert de Clyfton. (Rolls.)

Present Representative, John Talbot Clifton, Esq.

Present Representative, John Talbot Clifton, Esq.





Trafford of Trafford, Baronet 1841.

arms_page115.jpg

Trafford is in the parish of Eccles, and here the ancestors of this family are said to have been established even before the Norman Conquest. The pedigree given in Baines's Lancashire professes to be founded on documents in possession of the family, but some of it is certainly inaccurate, and cannot be depended on: Ralph de Trafford, who is said to have died about 1050, is the first recorded ancestor, but this is before the general assumption of surnames, which, as Camden observes, are first found in the Domesday Survey. On the whole, it may be assumed that the antiquity of the family is exaggerated, though the name no doubt is derived from this locality at an early period.

Trafford is in the parish of Eccles, and it's believed that the ancestors of this family were established here even before the Norman Conquest. The family tree presented in Baines's Lancashire claims to be based on documents held by the family, but some of it is definitely inaccurate and shouldn't be relied upon. Ralph de Trafford, who is said to have died around 1050, is the first recorded ancestor, but this is before surnames became common, which, as Camden notes, first appear in the Domesday Survey. Overall, it seems that the family's age is somewhat exaggerated, although the name likely originates from this area at an early time.

See Baines's Lancashire, iii. 110.

See Baines's Lancashire, vol. 3, p. 110.

Arms.—Argent, a gryphon segreant gules. See in "Hearne's Curious Discourses," i. 262. edit. 1771, for the supposed origin of the Trafford Crest, "a man thrashing," which was however only granted about the middle of the 16th century.

Arms.—Silver, a red gryphon standing upright. For the supposed origin of the Trafford Crest, "a man thrashing," see "Hearne's Curious Discourses," i. 262, edited in 1771. This was granted around the mid-16th century.

Present Representative, Sir Humphry Trafford, 2nd Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Humphry Trafford, 2nd Baronet.





Hesketh of Rufford, Baronet 1761

arms_page116.jpg

In the year 1275, the 4th of Edward I., Sir William Heskayte, Knight, married the coheiress of Fytton, and thus became possessed of Rufford, which has since remained the inheritance of this ancient family.

In the year 1275, during the reign of Edward I, Sir William Heskayte, Knight, married the coheiress of Fytton and acquired Rufford, which has since been passed down through this ancient family.

Younger branch. Hesketh of Gwyrch Castle, Denbighshire, descended from the Heskeths of Rossel, Lancashire, who were a younger branch of the house of Rufford.

Younger branch. Hesketh of Gwyrch Castle, Denbighshire, is descended from the Heskeths of Rossel, Lancashire, who formed a younger branch of the Rufford family.

See Baines's Lancashire, iii. 426.

See Baines's Lancashire, vol. iii, p. 426.

Arms.—Argent, on a bend sable three garbs or, the ancient coat of Fytton. Hesketh of Gwyrch Castle bears, Or, on a bend sable between two torteauxes three garbs of the field.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a black diagonal stripe featuring three golden wheatsheaves, the traditional coat of Fytton. Hesketh of Gwyrch Castle has, Gold, with a black diagonal stripe between two red circles and three wheatsheaves of the same color.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas George Hesketh, 5th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas George Hesketh, 5th Baronet.





Townley of Townley.

arms_page117.jpg

"This is not one of those long lines which are memorable only for their antiquity," says Whitaker, in his account of several remarkable members of this eminent family; who are descended from John del Legh, who died about the 4th of Edward III., and the great heiress Cecilia, daughter of Richard de Townley, whose family was of Saxon origin, and traced to the reign of Alfred. There is preserved at Townley, of which beautiful place Whitaker gives a charming account, an unbroken series of portraits from John Townley, Esq. in the reign of Elizabeth to the present time.

"This isn't one of those long lines that are only remembered for being old," says Whitaker in his account of several notable members of this distinguished family, which descends from John del Legh, who died around the 4th year of Edward III, and the great heiress Cecilia, daughter of Richard de Townley, whose family has Saxon roots and can be traced back to the reign of Alfred. There’s an unbroken series of portraits preserved at Townley, which Whitaker describes beautifully, ranging from John Townley, Esq. in the reign of Elizabeth to the present day.

See Leland's Itinerary, i. 96 and v. 102; Whitaker's Whalley, 271, 341, 484; and for the extinct branches of Hurstwood Hall, [1562-1794,] p. 384; and of Barnside [Edw. IV.—1739,] p. 395.

See Leland's Itinerary, i. 96 and v. 102; Whitaker's Whalley, 271, 341, 484; and for the extinct branches of Hurstwood Hall, [1562-1794,] p. 384; and of Barnside [Edw. IV.—1739,] p. 395.

For the origin of the Legh (properly Venables) family of Cheshire, see Leigh of Adlestrop, p. 92.

For the background of the Legh (actually Venables) family from Cheshire, refer to Leigh of Adlestrop, p. 92.

Arms.—Argent, a fess and in chief three mullets sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a band and three black stars above it.

Present Representative, Charles Townley, Esq.

Present Representative, Charles Townley, Esq.





Gerard of Bryan, Baronet 1611.

arms_page118.jpg

This family claims the same ancestor as the now extinct house of the Windsors Earls of Plymouth; the Carews also, both of England and Ireland, are descended, according to Camden, from the same progenitors: the pedigree therefore is extended to the Conquest, Otherus or Otho being the first recorded ancestor. The Lancashire branch were not settled there till the reign of Edward III., when they became possessed of Bryn, by marriage with the heiress of that name and place, From the Gerards of Ince descended the extinct Lords Gerard, of Gerard's-Bromley, and Sir William Gerard, Lord Chancellor of Ireland, who died in 1581.

This family traces its roots to the same ancestor as the now-extinct house of the Windsors, Earls of Plymouth. The Carews, both from England and Ireland, also claim descent from the same ancestors, according to Camden. This lineage goes back to the time of the Conquest, with Otherus or Otho being the first recorded ancestor. The Lancashire branch didn't settle there until the reign of Edward III, when they acquired Bryn through marriage with the heiress of that name and place. The Gerards of Ince gave rise to the extinct Lords Gerard of Gerard's-Bromley, and Sir William Gerard, who served as Lord Chancellor of Ireland and died in 1581.

See Baines's Lancashire, iii. 641; and Wotton's Baronetage, i. 51.

See Baines's Lancashire, iii. 641; and Wotton's Baronetage, i. 51.

Arms.—Argent, a saltire gules.

Arms.—Silver, a red saltire.

Present Representative, Sir Robert Tolver Gerard, 13th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Robert Tolver Gerard, 13th Baronet.





Stanley of Knowesley, Earl of Derby 1485; Baronet 1627.

arms_page119.jpg

Although Sir Rowland Stanley Errington, brother of Sir William Massey Stanley, late of Hooton, in the county of Chester, Baronet, is in fact the head of this illustrious house, yet, as that estate has been sold, and his family have now no connection with Cheshire, the Earl of Derby must be considered the chief, as he is in truth the principal, branch of the house of Stanley.

Although Sir Rowland Stanley Errington, brother of Sir William Massey Stanley, formerly of Hooton in Cheshire, is technically the head of this prestigious family, since that estate has been sold and his family no longer has ties to Cheshire, the Earl of Derby should be regarded as the chief since he is genuinely the principal branch of the Stanley family.

As few families have acted a more prominent part in History, so few can trace a more satisfactory pedigree. Descended from a younger branch of the Barons Audeley, of Audeley in Staffordshire, the name of Stanley, from the manor of that name in this county, in the reign of John, was assumed by William de Audleigh. Sir John Stanley, K.G., Lord Deputy of Ireland, in 1381 married the heiress of Lathom, and thus became possessed of Knowesley; it was this Sir John also who obtained a grant of the Isle of Man, which afterwards descended to the Murrays Dukes of Athol till 1765. The principal branch of this family became extinct on the death of James, tenth Earl, in 1736; when the earldom descended on Sir Edward Stanley of Bickerstaff, Baronet, descended from Sir James Stanley, brother of Thomas second Earl of Derby.

As few families have played a more significant role in history, so few can trace such a satisfying lineage. Descended from a younger branch of the Barons Audeley, from Audeley in Staffordshire, the name Stanley was adopted by William de Audleigh, who took it from the manor of that name in the county during the reign of John. Sir John Stanley, K.G., Lord Deputy of Ireland, married the heiress of Lathom in 1381, acquiring Knowesley as a result. It was this Sir John who also secured a grant for the Isle of Man, which later passed to the Murrays, Dukes of Athol, until 1765. The main branch of this family became extinct with the death of James, the tenth Earl, in 1736; the earldom then went to Sir Edward Stanley of Bickerstaff, Baronet, who was descended from Sir James Stanley, the brother of Thomas, the second Earl of Derby.

For Stanley of Hooton, see Ormerod's Cheshire, ii. 230. The famous, or rather infamous, Sir William Stanley was of this line.

For Stanley of Hooton, see Ormerod's Cheshire, ii. 230. The well-known, or rather notorious, Sir William Stanley was part of this lineage.

Younger Branches. Stanley of Cross-Hall, descended from Peter second son of Sir Thomas Stanley, 2nd Baronet, who died in 1653; and the family of the late Rev. James Stanley of Ormskirk, descended from Henry 2nd son of Sir Edward Stanley 1st. Bart. who died in 1640.

Younger Branches. Stanley of Cross-Hall, a descendant of Peter, the second son of Sir Thomas Stanley, 2nd Baronet, who died in 1653; and the family of the late Rev. James Stanley of Ormskirk, descended from Henry, the second son of Sir Edward Stanley 1st Bart., who died in 1640.

Stanley of Alderley, Cheshire, Baron Stanley of Alderley 1839, descended from Sir John Stanley and the heiress of Wever of Alderley. See Ormerod, iii. 306.

Stanley of Alderley, Cheshire, Baron Stanley of Alderley 1839, descended from Sir John Stanley and the heiress of Wever of Alderley. See Ormerod, iii. 306.

Stanley of Dalegarth, Cumberland, descended from John, second son of John Stanley, Esq., younger brother of Sir William Stanley, and the heiress of Bamville.

Stanley of Dalegarth, Cumberland, is a descendant of John, the second son of John Stanley, Esq., who was the younger brother of Sir William Stanley, and the heiress of Bamville.

See Brydges's Collins, iii. 50; Seacome's House of Stanley, 4to. 1741; for Stanley Legend, &c. Coll. Topog. et Genealog. vii. 1.

See Brydges's Collins, iii. 50; Seacome's House of Stanley, 4to. 1741; for Stanley Legend, &c. Coll. Topog. et Genealog. vii. 1.

Arms.—Argent, on a bend azure three buck's heads cabossed and attired or, assumed on the match with the heiress of Bamville, instead of the coat of Audeley.*

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a diagonal blue stripe featuring three deer heads facing forward with gold antlers, adopted upon marrying the heiress of Bamville, in place of the Audeley coat of arms.*

Present Representative, Edward Geoffery Smith Stanley, 14th Earl of Derby, K.G.

Present Representative, Edward Geoffrey Smith Stanley, 14th Earl of Derby, K.G.

* The Dalegarth family bear the bend cotised vert.




Assheton of Downham.

arms_page120.jpg

This is the only remaining branch of the old Lancashire family of Assheton, originally seated at Assheton-under-Lyne, and of whom the Asshetons of Middleton and of Great Lever, both Baronets, represented the elder lines. The present family descend from Radcliffe Assheton, second son of Ralph Assheton, of Great Lever, born in 1582.

This is the only remaining branch of the old Lancashire family of Assheton, originally based in Assheton-under-Lyne, and from whom the Asshetons of Middleton and Great Lever, both Baronets, descended from the elder lines. The current family descends from Radcliffe Assheton, the second son of Ralph Assheton of Great Lever, born in 1582.

Downham appears to have come into the family in the seventeenth century.

Downham seems to have become part of the family in the seventeenth century.

See Whitaker's Whalley, p. 299 and p. 300, for the curious journal of Nicholas Assheton, of Downham, Esq. 1617-18, since published entire as vol. xiv. of the series of the Chetham Society, 1848. For Assheton of Ashton-under-Lyne, Baines's Lancashire, ii. 532, and Collectanea Topog. et Genealog. vii. 12; for Ashton of Lever and Whalley, Baines, iii. 190.

See Whitaker's Whalley, pp. 299 and 300, for the interesting journal of Nicholas Assheton from Downham, Esq. 1617-18, which has been fully published as vol. xiv. in the series of the Chetham Society, 1848. For Assheton of Ashton-under-Lyne, refer to Baines's Lancashire, ii. 532, and Collectanea Topog. et Genealog. vii. 12; for Ashton of Lever and Whalley, see Baines, iii. 190.

Arms.—Argent, a mullet pierced sable.

Arms.—Silver, a black pierced star.

Present Representative, Ralph Assheton, Esq.

Present Representative, Ralph Assheton.





Radclyffe of Foxdenton.

arms_page121.jpg

This is a younger branch of the well-known Lancashire family of this name, who trace their descent from Richard of Radclyffe Tower, near Bury, in the reign of Edward I. Ordshall, also in this county, was for many ages the seat of the ancestors of the present family, who are descended from Robert, sixth and youngest son of Sir Alexander Radclyffe, of Ordshall, who was born in 1650. Foxdenton, which as early as the fifteenth century belonged to one branch of the Radclyffes, was bequeathed to the present family early in the last century. The extinct house of the Radclyffes, Barons Fitzwalter and Earls of Sussex 1529, were sprung from William, elder brother of the first Sir John Radclyffe, of Ordshall. The Radclyffes of Dilston, Baronets 1619, and Earls of Derwentwater 1687, were perhaps also of the same origin, but this has not been ascertained.

This is a younger branch of the well-known Lancashire family of this name, who trace their ancestry back to Richard of Radclyffe Tower, near Bury, during the reign of Edward I. Ordshall, also in this county, was for many years the home of the ancestors of the current family, who are descendants of Robert, the sixth and youngest son of Sir Alexander Radclyffe of Ordshall, born in 1650. Foxdenton, which belonged to one branch of the Radclyffes as early as the fifteenth century, was passed down to the current family early in the last century. The now-extinct house of the Radclyffes, Barons Fitzwalter and Earls of Sussex since 1529, descended from William, the elder brother of the first Sir John Radclyffe of Ordshall. The Radclyffes of Dilston, Baronet 1619, and Earls of Derwentwater since 1687, possibly also share the same origin, though this has not been confirmed.

See Burke's Landed Gentry, 2nd. ed. vol. ii. p. 1091, and Ellis's Family of Radclyffe, for the House of Dilston (1850).

See Burke's Landed Gentry, 2nd ed. vol. ii. p. 1091, and Ellis's Family of Radclyffe, for the House of Dilston (1850).

Arms.—Argent, two bends engrailed sable, a label of three points gules. The more simple coat of Argent, a bend engrailed sable, was borne by the Earls of Sussex, and also by the Earls of Derwentwater.

Coat of Arms.—Silver with two wavy black stripes and a red label with three points. A simpler version, Silver with a wavy black stripe, was used by the Earls of Sussex and the Earls of Derwentwater.

Present Representative, Robert. Radclyffe, Esq.

Present Rep, Robert Radclyffe, Esq.





Gentle.

Hulton of Hulton.

arms_page122.jpg

Hulton is in the parish of Dean, and gave name to Bleythen, called de Hulton, in the reign of Henry II., and from him this ancient family, still seated at their ancestral and original manor, is regularly descended.

Hulton is in the parish of Dean and gave its name to Bleythen, known as de Hulton, during the reign of Henry II. This ancient family, which still resides at their original manor, is linearly descended from him.

See Baines's Lancashire, iii. p. 40.

See Baines's Lancashire, iii. p. 40.

Arms.—Argent, a lion rampant gules.

Arms.—Silver, a red lion rampant.

Present Representative, William Hulton, Esq.

Present Rep, William Hulton, Esq.





Eccleston of Scarisbrick (called Scarisbrick).

arms_page123.jpg

Descended from Robert Eccleston of Eccleston, living in the reign of Henry III., an estate which continued in the family until the last generation, when it was sold, and that of Scarisbrick, with the name, acquired by marriage about the same period.

Descended from Robert Eccleston of Eccleston, who lived during the reign of Henry III, an estate that remained in the family until the last generation, when it was sold, along with the name of Scarisbrick, which was acquired through marriage around the same time.

See Baines, iii. 480; and for Scarisbrick, iv. 258.

See Baines, iii. 480; and for Scarisbrick, iv. 258.

In Flower's Visitation of this county, in 1567, is a pedigree of Eccleston.

In Flower's visit to this county in 1567, there's a family tree of Eccleston.

Arms.—Argent, a cross sable, in the first quarter a fleur-de-lis gules.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a black cross; in the top left quarter, there is a red fleur-de-lis.

Present Representative, Charles Scarisbrick, Esq.

Current Representative, Charles Scarisbrick, Esq.





Ormerod of Tyldesley.

arms_page124a.jpg

There is a good pedigree of this, his own family, in Ormerod's History of Cheshire, (ii. p. 204,) under Chorlton, a seat of the family purchased in 1811. The first recorded ancestor is Matthew de Hormerodes, living about 1270. The elder line of his descendants, whose name was derived from Ormerod in Whalley, became extinct in 1793. The present family trace their lineage from George Ormerod, fourth son of Peter Ormerod, of Ormerod, who died in 1653.

There’s a solid family history about this in Ormerod's History of Cheshire, (ii. p. 204), under Chorlton, a property the family bought in 1811. The first known ancestor is Matthew de Hormerodes, who lived around 1270. The older branch of his descendants, named after Ormerod in Whalley, went extinct in 1793. The current family traces their lineage back to George Ormerod, the fourth son of Peter Ormerod from Ormerod, who passed away in 1653.

See also Whitaker's Whalley, p. 364.

See also Whitaker's Whalley, p. 364.

Arms.—Or, three bars, and in chief a lion passant gules.

Coat of Arms.—Gold background, with three horizontal bars, and a red lion walking at the top.

Present Representative, George Ormerod, Esq.

Present Rep, George Ormerod, Esq.





Starkie of Huntroyd.

arms_page124b.jpg

The pedigree begins with Geoffry Starky, of Barthington (Barnton) in Cheshire, supposed to be the same with Geoffry, son of Richard Starkie, of Stretton, in the same county, an ancient family which can be traced almost to the Conquest. William Starkie was of Barnton in the seventh of Edward IV. Huntroyd was acquired by marriage, in 1464, with the heiress of Symondstone.

The family tree starts with Geoffry Starky from Barthington (Barnton) in Cheshire, believed to be the same as Geoffry, son of Richard Starkie from Stretton, in the same county, a long-established family traced back nearly to the Conquest. William Starkie was in Barnton during the seventh year of Edward IV. Huntroyd was obtained through marriage in 1464, when he married the heiress of Symondstone.

See Whitaker's Whalley, 266, 529; also Ormerod's Cheshire, i. 474; and Baines, iii. 309.

See Whitaker's Whalley, 266, 529; also Ormerod's Cheshire, i. 474; and Baines, iii. 309.

Younger branches. Starkie of Twiston, and Starkie of Thornton, Yorkshire.

Younger branches. Starkie of Twiston, and Starkie of Thornton, Yorkshire.

Arms.—Argent, a bend between six storks sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, featuring a diagonal stripe with six black storks.

Present Representative, Le Gendre Starkie, Esq.

Present Representative, Le Gendre Starkie, Esq.





Chadwick of Healey.

arms_page125.jpg

A younger branch of Chadwick of Chadwick, now extinct, a family which can be traced to the reign of Edward III.

A younger branch of the Chadwick family, which is now extinct, can be traced back to the reign of Edward III.

Healey came from the coheiress of Okeden in 1483. Mavesyn Ridware, in Staffordshire, is also the property of this family, derived by an heiress from the Cawardens, and ultimately from the Malvesyns, who came in with the Conqueror.

Healey came from the coheiress of Okeden in 1483. Mavesyn Ridware, in Staffordshire, also belongs to this family, inherited from an heiress of the Cawardens, and ultimately from the Malvesyns, who came with the Conqueror.

Younger branch. Chadwick of Swinton, in this county, derived from the heiress of Strettell: they bear their arms differenced by a border engrailed or, charged with cross crosslets.

Younger branch. Chadwick of Swinton, in this county, comes from the heiress of Strettell: they bear their arms differentiated by a border engrailed or, charged with cross crosslets.

See Shaw's Staffordshire, i. p. 166, for a curious account of the Malvesyns, Cawardens, and Chadwicks of Mavesyn Ridware: see also Whitaker's Whalley, p. 459.

See Shaw's Staffordshire, vol. 1, p. 166, for an interesting account of the Malvesyns, Cawardens, and Chadwicks of Mavesyn Ridware; also check out Whitaker's Whalley, p. 459.

Arms.—Gules, an inescutcheon within an orle of martlets argent.

Coat of Arms.—Red, a shield with a border of silver martlets.

Present Representative, John de Heley Mavesyn Chadwick, Esq.

Present Representative, John de Heley Mavesyn Chadwick, Esq.





Patten of Bank-Hall.

arms_page126.jpg

Richard Patten, who appears to have flourished before the reign of Henry III. by his marriage with a coheiress of Dagenham became possessed of the Court of that name in the county of Essex, and was the remote ancestor of this family. John Patten of Dagenham Court, living in 1376, removed to Waynflete in Lincolnshire; he was the great-grandfather of the celebrated William Patten alias Waynflete Bishop of Winchester; from whose brother, Richard Patten, of Boslow, in the county of Derby, the present family descend. His son was of Warrington in this county in 1536.

Richard Patten, who seems to have thrived before Henry III's reign, gained ownership of the Court of Dagenham in Essex through his marriage to a coheiress. He was the distant ancestor of this family. John Patten of Dagenham Court, who lived in 1376, moved to Waynflete in Lincolnshire; he was the great-grandfather of the well-known William Patten, also known as Waynflete, Bishop of Winchester. The present family descends from William's brother, Richard Patten, of Boslow in Derbyshire. His son lived in Warrington in this county in 1536.

See the pedigree by Bigland and Heard drawn up in 1770, and printed in Bloxam's Memorial of Bishop Waynflete for the Caxton Society in 1851.

See the family tree by Bigland and Heard created in 1770, and printed in Bloxam's Memorial of Bishop Waynflete for the Caxton Society in 1851.

Arms.—Lozengy ermine and sable, a canton gules.

Arms.—Diamond-shaped patterns in white and black, featuring a red square in the corner.

Present Representative, John Wilson Patten, Esq. M.P. for North Lancashire.

Present Representative, John Wilson Patten, Esq. M.P. for North Lancashire.





LEICESTERSHIRE.

Knightly.

Turvile of Husband's Bosworth.

arms_page127.jpg

"One of the ancientest families in the whole shire," wrote Burton in 1622; descended from Ralph Turvile, a benefactor to the abbey of Leicester in 1297. The principal seat was at Normanton Turvile, in this county, where the elder line of the family became extinct in 1776. Aston Flamvile, also in Leicestershire, was the residence of the immediate ancestors of this younger branch. It was sold early in the eighteenth century, and Husband's Bosworth inherited, by the will of Maria-Alathea Fortescue, in 1763.

"One of the oldest families in the entire county," wrote Burton in 1622; they descended from Ralph Turvile, a supporter of the abbey of Leicester in 1297. The main residence was at Normanton Turvile, in this county, where the older branch of the family went extinct in 1776. Aston Flamvile, also in Leicestershire, was the home of the immediate ancestors of this younger branch. It was sold in the early eighteenth century, and Husband's Bosworth inherited it through the will of Maria-Alathea Fortescue in 1763.

See Nichols's Leicestershire, under Normanton Turvile, iv. pt. 2. 1004; under Aston Flamvile, ii. pt. 2. 465; under Husband's Bosworth, iv. pt. 2. 451

See Nichols's Leicestershire, under Normanton Turvile, iv. pt. 2. 1004; under Aston Flamvile, ii. pt. 2. 465; under Husband's Bosworth, iv. pt. 2. 451

Arms.—Gules, three chevronels vair. This coat was borne by Sir Richard Turvile, de co. Warw. in the reign of Edward II., and Sir Nicholas Turvil, at the same period, bore the same coat reduced to two chevrons. (Rolls of the date.)

Coat of Arms.—Red with three small fur chevrons. This coat was worn by Sir Richard Turvile of Warwickshire during the reign of Edward II, while Sir Nicholas Turvil displayed a similar coat at the same time, but with only two chevrons instead. (Rolls of the date.)

Present Representative, Francis Charles Turvile, Esq.

Present Representative, Francis Charles Turvile, Esq.





Farnham of Quorndon.

arms_page128.jpg

This ancient family was certainly seated at Quorndon two descents before the reign of Edward I. In that of Henry VI. Thomas, second son of John Farnham and Margaret Billington, living in 1393, founded a junior branch denominated of "The Nether-Hall." He was the ancestor of the present family, who also descend in the female line from the elder branch, denominated "of Quorndon," by the marriage of the coheiress in 1703 with Benjamin Farnham, of the Nether-Hall.

This old family was definitely established in Quorndon two generations before the reign of Edward I. During the time of Henry VI, Thomas, the second son of John Farnham and Margaret Billington, who was living in 1393, founded a younger branch known as "The Nether-Hall." He is the ancestor of the current family, which also has ties to the older branch called "of Quorndon," through the marriage of the coheiress in 1703 to Benjamin Farnham of the Nether-Hall.

See Nichols's History of Leicestershire, vol. iii. pt. i. p. 103.

See Nichols's History of Leicestershire, vol. iii. pt. i. p. 103.

Arms.—Quarterly or and azure, in the first and second quarter a crescent interchanged.

Coat of Arms.—Divided into four sections, blue and white, featuring a crescent shape in the first and second sections.

Sir Robert de Farnham, of the county of Stafford, bore in the reign of Edward II. Quarterly argent and azure, four crescents counterchanged. (Roll.)

Sir Robert de Farnham, from Stafford County, had the following coat of arms during the reign of Edward II: Quarterly silver and blue, four crescents alternating in color. (Roll.)

Present Representative, Edward Basil Farnham, Esq. late M.P. for North Leicestershire.

Present Representative, Edward Basil Farnham, Esq. former M.P. for North Leicestershire.





Beaumont of Coleorton, Baronet 1660.

arms_page129.jpg

Lewis de Brienne, who died in 1283, married Agnes, Viscountess de Beaumont, who died in 1300: their children took the name of Beaumont, and from hence this noble family is supposed to be descended. Coleorton came from the heiress of Maureward in the fifteenth century, but Grace-dieu, also in this county, was the older seat. The representative of the elder line of the family was created Viscount Beaumont in Ireland in 1622, extinct 1702, when Coleorton went to the ancestors of the present Baronet, descended from the third son of Nicholas Beaumont, of Coleorton, who died in 1585.

Lewis de Brienne, who passed away in 1283, was married to Agnes, Viscountess de Beaumont, who died in 1300. Their children took on the Beaumont name, and this is believed to be the origin of this noble family. Coleorton came from the heiress of Maureward in the fifteenth century, but Grace-dieu, also in this county, was the earlier residence. The representative of the older line of the family was made Viscount Beaumont in Ireland in 1622, which became extinct in 1702. At that time, Coleorton went to the ancestors of the current Baronet, who is a descendant of the third son of Nicholas Beaumont of Coleorton, who died in 1585.

See Nicholas Leicestershire, iii. pt. 2. 743; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 230; Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, 396; and Hornby's Tract on Dugdale's Baronage.

See Nicholas Leicestershire, iii. pt. 2. 743; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 230; Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, 396; and Hornby's Tract on Dugdale's Baronage.

Arms.—Azure, semée of fleurs-de-lis and a lion rampant or. Sir Henry de Beaumont bore this coat with a baton gabonny argent and gules, in the reign of Edward II.; in that of Richard II. Mons. de Beaumont omitted the baton (Rolls of the dates.)

Coat of Arms.—Blue, dotted with lilies and a golden lion standing on one hind leg. Sir Henry de Beaumont showed this coat with a silver and red striped baton during the reign of Edward II; under Richard II, Mr. de Beaumont omitted the baton (Rolls of the dates.)

Present Representative, Sir George Howland Beaumont, ninth Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir George Howland Beaumont, ninth Baronet.





Grey of Groby and Bradgate, Earl of Stamford 1628; Baron 1603.

arms_page130.jpg

Dugdale begins the pedigree of this great historical family with Henry de Grey, unto whom King Richard the First in the sixth year of his reign gave the manor of Turroc or Thurrock in Essex. His son Richard was of Codnoure or Codnor in Derbyshire, inherited from his mother, a coheiress of Bardolf. Groby and Bradgate came from the heiress of Ferrers in the reign of Henry VI. Of the latter Leland writes, "This parke was parte of the old Erles of Leicester's landes, and since by heires generales it came to the Lord Ferrers of Groby, and so to the Greyes."

Dugdale starts the family tree of this significant historical family with Henry de Grey, to whom King Richard the First granted the manor of Turroc or Thurrock in Essex in the sixth year of his reign. His son Richard was associated with Codnoure or Codnor in Derbyshire, which he inherited from his mother, a coheiress of Bardolf. Groby and Bradgate came from the heiress of Ferrers during the reign of Henry VI. Regarding the latter, Leland writes, "This park was part of the old Earl of Leicester's lands, which later came to the Lord Ferrers of Groby through general heirs, and then to the Greyes."

Extinct Branches of this illustrious family were, the Greys of Codnor, of Wilton, of Rotherfield, of Ruthyn, and the Dukes of Kent and Suffolk.

Extinct branches of this illustrious family include the Greys of Codnor, Wilton, Rotherfield, Ruthyn, and the Dukes of Kent and Suffolk.

See Dugdale's Baronage, i. 709; Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. pt. 2. 682; Brydges's Collins, iii. 340.

See Dugdale's Baronage, i. 709; Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. pt. 2. 682; Brydges's Collins, iii. 340.

Arms.—Barry of six, argent and azure. Richard de Grey bore this coat in the reign of Henry III. John de Grey differenced it with a label gules. In the reign of Edward II. the same arms were borne by different members of the family, with the additions of a bend gules, a label gules, a label gules bezantée, a baton gules, and three torteauxes in chief, which last was used by the Dukes of Suffolk.

Coat of Arms.—Six vertical stripes in silver and blue. Richard de Grey used this coat during the reign of Henry III. John de Grey added a red label to it. During Edward II's reign, different family members showcased the same arms, incorporating a red diagonal stripe, a red label, a red label with gold discs, a red baton, and three red roundels at the top, with the last being used by the Dukes of Suffolk.

Present Representative, George Harry Grey, seventh Earl of Stamford and Warrington.

Present Representative, George Harry Grey, seventh Earl of Stamford and Warrington.





Babington, of Rothley-Temple.

arms_page131.jpg

The Babingtons were of Babington in Northumberland in the reign of King John: they afterwards removed into Nottinghamshire, and became very distinguished. The elder line was seated at Dethick in Ashover, in the county of Derby, by marriage with the coheiress of the ancient family of that name, before the year 1431. The Rothley branch, descended from a second son of the house of Dethick, was seated there at the very beginning of the sixteenth century, and is now the chief line of the family on the extinction of Babington of Dethick about 1650.

The Babingtons originated from Babington in Northumberland during the reign of King John. They later moved to Nottinghamshire and became notable figures. The main line was established at Dethick in Ashover, Derbyshire, through marriage with the coheiress of that ancient family, before 1431. The Rothley branch, which came from a second son of the Dethick family, was settled there at the start of the sixteenth century and is now the principal line of the family after the Babingtons of Dethick died out around 1650.

See Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. pt. 2. 955; and Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica, ii. 94, and viii. 313, for a most valuable article on the elder line of this family. See also Topographer and Genealogist, i. 133, 259, 333, for the various branches of this ancient family.

See Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. pt. 2. 955; and Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica, ii. 94, and viii. 313, for a highly valuable article on the older branch of this family. Also, check out Topographer and Genealogist, i. 133, 259, 333, for the different branches of this ancient family.

Arms.—Argent, ten torteauxes and a label of three points azure. This coat reversed and without the label was borne by Sir John de Babington in the reign of Edward II. (Roll of the date.)

Arms.—Silver, ten red circles and a blue banner with three points. This coat, reversed and without the banner, was worn by Sir John de Babington during the reign of Edward II. (Roll of the date.)

Present Representative, Thomas Gisborne Babington, Esq.

Present Representative, Thomas Gisborne Babington, Esq.





Gentle.

Hazlerigg of Noseley, Baronet 1622.

arms_page132.jpg

Originally of Northumberland, where Simon de Hasilrig was seated in the time of Edward I. Early in the fifteenth century Thomas Hasilrig of Fawdon, in that county, having married Isabel Heron, heiress of Noseley, the family removed into Leicestershire. Leland makes the following mention of the head of the house in his time, "Hasilrig of Northamptonshire [a mistake for Leicestershire] hath about 50li lande in Northumbreland, at Esselington, where is a pratie pile of Hasilriggs; and one of the Coilingwooddes dwellith now in it, and hath the over-site of his landes."

Originally from Northumberland, where Simon de Hasilrig lived during Edward I's reign. In the early 15th century, Thomas Hasilrig of Fawdon, in that county, married Isabel Heron, the heiress of Noseley, and the family moved to Leicestershire. Leland mentions the head of the family during his time: "Hasilrig of Northamptonshire [a mistake for Leicestershire] has about 50li land in Northumberland, at Esselington, where there is a notable house of the Hasilrigs; and one of the Coilingwoods now lives there and oversees his lands."

See Leland's Itin., i. fol. 15. v. fol. 101; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 520; Nichols's Leicestershire, ii. pt. 2. 756; and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, vol. ii. p. 325.

See Leland's Itin., i. fol. 15. v. fol. 101; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 520; Nichols's Leicestershire, ii. pt. 2. 756; and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, vol. ii. p. 325.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three hazel-leaves slipped vert.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, with a chevron between three green hazel leaves.

Present Representative, Sir Arthur Grey Hazlerigg, 12th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Arthur Grey Hazlerigg, 12th Baronet.





Wollaston of Shenton.

arms_page133.jpg

The Wollastons were lords of the manor of Wollaston in the parish of Old Swinford and county of Stafford, (which they sold to the Aston family in the time of Richard II.) at a very early period: they afterwards settled at Trescot and Perton, in the parish of Tettenhall, in the same shire. The pedigree in Nichols's Leicestershire begins with Thomas Wollaston of Perton, "a person of figure in the reigns of Henry VII. and VIII." In 1709, William Wollaston, Esq., the celebrated author of "The Religion of Nature," compiled an account of this family, which is printed in the History of Leicestershire. He was the direct ancestor of the present family, who have been also seated at Oncott, in Staffordshire, and Finborough Hall, in Suffolk. Shenton was acquired early in the reign of James I.

The Wollastons were lords of the manor of Wollaston in the Old Swinford parish and Staffordshire county (which they sold to the Aston family during the reign of Richard II) at a very early period. They later settled at Trescot and Perton in the Tettenhall parish in the same county. The family tree in Nichols's Leicestershire starts with Thomas Wollaston of Perton, "a notable figure during the reigns of Henry VII and VIII." In 1709, William Wollaston, Esq., the renowned author of "The Religion of Nature," put together an account of this family, which is published in the History of Leicestershire. He was the direct ancestor of the current family, who have also been based at Oncott in Staffordshire and Finborough Hall in Suffolk. Shenton was acquired early in the reign of James I.

See Nichols's Leicestershire, iv. pt. 2. 541.

See Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. 4, part 2, page 541.

Arms.—Argent, three mullets pierced sable.

Arms.—Silver, three black starbursts.

Present Representative, Frederick William Wollaston, Esq.

Present Representative, Frederick William Wollaston, Esq.





LINCOLNSHIRE.

Knightly.

Welby of Denton, Baronet 1801.

arms_page134.jpg

Welby, near Grantham, in this county, is supposed to have given name to this "ancient howse, Bering armes,"* and here Sir William Welby, who heads their well-authenticated pedigree, undoubtedly possessed property between 1307 and 1327. The manor of Frieston, with Poynton Hall, also in Lincolnshire, was held by Sir Thomas Welby, (who it cannot be doubted was a still earlier ancestor,) of King Henry III. in chief, in 1216. The first-mentioned Sir William having married the heiress of Multon of Multon in this county, that place continued, till the end of the sixteenth century, the principal seat of his descendants. Denton was purchased by John Welby, the ancestor of the present family, in 1539.

Welby, near Grantham in this county, is believed to have given its name to this "ancient house, bearing arms," and here Sir William Welby, who is clearly documented in their lineage, owned property between 1307 and 1327. The manor of Frieston, along with Poynton Hall, also in Lincolnshire, was held by Sir Thomas Welby, who was undoubtedly an even earlier ancestor, from King Henry III. in 1216. The aforementioned Sir William married the heiress of Multon of Multon in this county, and that location remained the main residence of his descendants until the end of the sixteenth century. John Welby, the ancestor of the current family, purchased Denton in 1539.

See "Notices of the Family of Welby," 8vo., Grantham, 1842; and Allen's History of Lincolnshire, ii. 314; for Welby of Multon, see Blore's Rutlandshire, 192.

See "Notices of the Family of Welby," 8vo., Grantham, 1842; and Allen's History of Lincolnshire, ii. 314; for Welby of Multon, see Blore's Rutlandshire, 192.

Arms.—Sable, a fess between three fleurs-de-lis argent.

Arms.—Black, with a stripe between three silver fleurs-de-lis.

Present Representative, Sir Glynne Earle Welby, 3rd Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Glynne Earle Welby, 3rd Baronet.

* So styled in the Heralds' grant of crest in 1562.




Dymoke of Scrivelsby, Champion of England.

arms_page135.jpg

The name is supposed to be derived from Dimmok, in the county of Gloucester, but the pedigree is not proved beyond Henry Dymmok in the second year of Edward III. His grandson John married Margaret, sole grand-daughter and heir of Sir Thomas de Ludlowe, by Joan youngest daughter and coheir of Philip last Lord Marmyon, Baron of Scrivelsby, and by the tenure of that manor hereditary Champion of England, which office, since the Coronation of Richard II. has been held by the Dymoke family.

The name is believed to come from Dimmok, in Gloucester County, but the family history isn't confirmed beyond Henry Dymmok in the second year of Edward III. His grandson John married Margaret, the only granddaughter and heir of Sir Thomas de Ludlowe, who was the son of Joan, the youngest daughter and coheir of Philip, the last Lord Marmyon, Baron of Scrivelsby. Because of the ownership of that manor, the Dymoke family has held the hereditary title of Champion of England since the coronation of Richard II.

See Banks's Family of Marmyon, p. 117; and Allen's Lincolnshire, ii. 83.

See Banks's Family of Marmyon, p. 117; and Allen's Lincolnshire, ii. 83.

Arms.—Sable, two lions passant argent crowned or. Borne by Monsr. John Dymoke in the reign of Richard II. (Roll of the date.)

Coat of Arms.—Black field, featuring two silver lions walking, each crowned in gold. Used by Mr. John Dymoke during the reign of Richard II. (Roll of the date.)

Present Representative, The Honourable and Rev. John Dymoke.

Present Representative, The Honorable and Rev. John Dymoke.





Heneage of Hainton.

arms_page136.jpg

John Heneage stands at the head of the pedigree; he was living in the 38th Henry III. From him descended another John, who in the 10th of Edward III. was Lord of the Manor of Hainton; according to Leland however, "the olde Henege lands passid not a fyfetie poundes by the yere." The family evidently rose on the ruins of the monastic houses: "Syr Thomas Hennage hath doone much cost at Haynton, where he is Lorde and Patrone, yn translating and new building with brike and abbay stone."

John Heneage is at the top of the family tree; he was alive during the 38th year of Henry III's reign. He had a descendant also named John, who was Lord of the Manor of Hainton in the 10th year of Edward III's reign. However, according to Leland, "the old Heneage lands didn't bring in more than fifty pounds a year." The family clearly benefited from the decline of the monastic houses: "Sir Thomas Hennage has spent a lot of money at Haynton, where he is Lord and Patron, on renovations and new construction using brick and abbey stone."

See Leland's Itinerary, vii. fol. 52; and Allen's History of Lincolnshire, ii. 67.

See Leland's Itinerary, vii. fol. 52; and Allen's History of Lincolnshire, ii. 67.

Arms.—Or, a greyhound courant sable between three leopard's heads azure, a border engrailed gules.

Coat of Arms.—Gold, a black greyhound in motion positioned between three blue leopard heads, with a red wavy border.

Present Representative, Edward Heneage, Esq., M.P. for Lincoln.

Present Representative, Edward Heneage, Esq., M.P. for Lincoln.





Manners of Belvoir Castle, Duke of Rutland 1703, Earl 1525.

arms_page137.jpg

Originally of Northumberland, where the family were seated at an early period. The first recorded ancestor is Sir Robert de Maners, who obtained a grant of land in Berrington in 1327, and was M.P. for Northumberland in 1340. His son William Maners, of Etal, died before 1324, which estate appears to have been inherited from an heiress of Muschamp. At the end of the fifteenth century, by marriage with the heiress of the baronial family of Roos, the house of Manners came into possession of the Castle of Belvoir. In the succeeding century, a fortunate match with the heiress of Vernon of Haddon still further increased the wealth and importance of this noble family.

Originally from Northumberland, where the family established themselves early on. The first recorded ancestor is Sir Robert de Maners, who received a land grant in Berrington in 1327 and served as M.P. for Northumberland in 1340. His son, William Maners of Etal, died before 1324, and this estate seems to have been inherited from an heiress of Muschamp. By the end of the fifteenth century, through marriage with the heiress of the baronial family of Roos, the Manners family acquired the Castle of Belvoir. In the following century, a fortunate union with the heiress of Vernon of Haddon further enhanced the wealth and significance of this noble family.

The royal title of Rutland, which had belonged to the house of York, was conferred upon Thomas Lord Roos in 1525 as the grandson of the lady Anne of York, sister to King Edward the Fourth.

The royal title of Rutland, which had belonged to the House of York, was given to Thomas Lord Roos in 1525 as the grandson of Lady Anne of York, sister to King Edward IV.

An extinct branch was from the time of Henry VIII. for a long period of Newmanor House, in the parish of Framlington, in Durham. Another branch of the Etal family was of Cheswick, in the same county, extinct after 1633.

An extinct branch dated back to the time of Henry VIII. for a long time of Newmanor House, in the parish of Framlington, in Durham. Another branch of the Etal family was from Cheswick, in the same county, which became extinct after 1633.

See Raine's North Durham, 211, 230; Nichols's Leicestershire, ii. pt. i. 67; and Brydges's Collins, i. 454.

See Raine's North Durham, 211, 230; Nichols's Leicestershire, ii. pt. i. 67; and Brydges's Collins, i. 454.

Arms.—Or, two bars azure; a chief quarterly azure and gules, on the 1st and 4th two fleurs-de-lis, on the 2nd and 3rd a leopard of England of the first; the chief being an augmentation granted by Henry VIII. The ancient arms, no doubt founded on those of the Muschamp family, were, Or, two bars azure, a chief gules. See the Rolls of the reign of Edward II. and Richard III.

Coat of Arms.—Gold background, two blue stripes; a quartered top section in blue and red, featuring 1st and 4th quarters with two fleurs-de-lis, and 2nd and 3rd quarters displaying a gold leopard from England; the top section being an enhancement granted by Henry VIII. The original coat of arms, likely inspired by the Muschamp family’s arms, were Gold background, two blue stripes, a red top section. Refer to the records from the reigns of Edward II and Richard III.

Present Representative, Charles Cecil John Manners, sixth Duke of Rutland.

Present Representative, Charles Cecil John Manners, 6th Duke of Rutland.





Alington of Sswinhope.

arms_page138.jpg

This is a branch of the extinct family of the Lords Alington, of Horseheath, in Cambridgeshire, who were originally of Alington, in the same county, soon after the Conquest. The family descend from a younger son of Sir Giles Alington, and were seated at Swinhope in the reign of Queen Elizabeth.

This is a branch of the extinct Lords Alington family from Horseheath in Cambridgeshire, who originally came from Alington in the same county shortly after the Conquest. The family descends from a younger son of Sir Giles Alington and settled at Swinhope during Queen Elizabeth's reign.

See Clutterbuck's History of Hertfordshire, ii. 542; and Collectanea Topog. et Genealog. iv. 33-53, and note 2, p. 39. For Horseheath, see Topographer, ii. 374.

See Clutterbuck's History of Hertfordshire, ii. 542; and Collectanea Topog. et Genealog. iv. 33-53, and note 2, p. 39. For Horseheath, see Topographer, ii. 374.

Arms.—Sable, a bend engrailed between six billets argent.

Coat of Arms.—Black, featuring a notched diagonal band among six silver rectangles.

Present Representative, George Marmaduke Alington, Esq.

Present Representative, George Marmaduke Alington, Esq.





Gentle.

Thorold of Marston, Baronet 1642.

arms_page139.jpg

It has been supposed, but without any evidence or authority, that this family is descended from Thorold, Sheriff of Lincolnshire in 1052, and that consequently it may claim Saxon origin. There is however no doubt that this is a family of very great antiquity, and seated at Marston as early as the reign of Henry I.

It has been assumed, though without any proof or authority, that this family is descended from Thorold, Sheriff of Lincolnshire in 1052, and therefore can claim Saxon origins. However, there is no doubt that this is a very ancient family, established at Marston as early as the reign of Henry I.

See Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 338, and iv. 250.

See Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 338, and iv. 250.

Arms.—Sable, three goats salient argent.

Arms.—Black, three rearing silver goats.

Present Representative, Sir John Charles Thorold, 11th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Charles Thorold, 11th Baronet.





Langton of Langton.

arms_page140a.jpg

"Langton, Sir," exclaimed Dr. Johnson, alluding to his friend Bennet Langton of Langton, at that time the accomplished head of this very ancient family, "has a grant of free warren from Henry the Second, and Cardinal Stephen Langton in King John's reign was of this family." The name is derived from Langton-by-Spilsby in Lincolnshire, a manor which has remained to the present day the inheritance of this house, who are descended in the female line from the Massingberds of Sutterton in this county.

"Langton, Sir," Dr. Johnson exclaimed, referring to his friend Bennet Langton of Langton, who was then the distinguished head of this very old family, "has a grant of free warren from Henry II, and Cardinal Stephen Langton during King John's reign was from this family." The name comes from Langton-by-Spilsby in Lincolnshire, a manor that has remained, to this day, the inheritance of this house, which is descended through the female line from the Massingberds of Sutterton in this county.

Younger branch. The Langton-Massingberds of Gunby.

Younger branch. The Langton-Massingberds of Gunby.

See Allen's History of the County of Lincoln, ii. 175; and Boswell's Life of Johnson, ed. 1836, i. 294.

See Allen's History of the County of Lincoln, ii. 175; and Boswell's Life of Johnson, ed. 1836, i. 294.

Arms.—Paly of six argent and sable, a bend or.

Coat of Arms.—Split vertically into six sections, silver and black, featuring a gold diagonal stripe.

Present Representative, Bennet Rothes Langton, Esq.

Present Representative, Bennet Rothes Langton, Attorney at Law.





Massingberd of Wrangle.

arms_page140b.jpg

This very ancient family is descended from Lambert Massyngberd of Soterton, now Sutterton, in this county, who lived in the reign of Edward I. and has ever since remained in Lincolnshire. In the latter part of the fifteenth century, by the marriage of Sir Thomas Massyngberd with the heiress of Braytoft of Braytoft Hall in Gunby, the Massingberds removed to that place, which became the principal seat of their descendants. Ormsby, purchased from the Skipwiths in 1636, and afterwards Gunby Hall, built by Sir William Massingberd, the 2nd Baronet of this family, in 1699, was their principal residence, till it went by an heiress to a younger branch of the Langtons, who have assumed the name. Wrangle is a recent purchase in this county by the present representative of the male line of the family. The Massingberds early embraced the Reformed faith. Thomas Massingberd, the last representative for Calais in 1552, "fled abroad for his religion" under Mary. Nevertheless his descendant, William Burrell Massingberd of Ormsby, joined Prince Charles Edward at Derby: a miniature given to him by the Prince is still in the family. Ormsby belongs at present to a younger branch of the Mundys of Markeaton in Derbyshire, who have assumed the name of Massingberd.

This very old family descends from Lambert Massyngberd of Soterton, now Sutterton, in this county, who lived during the reign of Edward I and has stayed in Lincolnshire ever since. In the late 1400s, through the marriage of Sir Thomas Massyngberd to the heiress of Braytoft of Braytoft Hall in Gunby, the Massingberds moved to that location, which became the main seat of their descendants. Ormsby, bought from the Skipwiths in 1636, and later Gunby Hall, built by Sir William Massingberd, the 2nd Baronet of this family, in 1699, was their main residence until it passed by an heiress to a younger branch of the Langtons, who adopted the name. Wrangle is a recent purchase in this county by the current representative of the male line of the family. The Massingberds early on embraced the Reformed faith. Thomas Massingberd, the last representative for Calais in 1552, "fled abroad for his religion" during Mary’s rule. However, his descendant, William Burrell Massingberd of Ormsby, joined Prince Charles Edward at Derby: a miniature given to him by the Prince is still in the family. Ormsby currently belongs to a younger branch of the Mundys of Markeaton in Derbyshire, who have taken on the name Massingberd.

See the Genealogy of this House, a MS. by Robert Dale, Suffolk Herald, compiled about the year 1718, and still at Ormsby; and Allen's History of the County, under Ormsby and Gunby.

See the Genealogy of this House, a manuscript by Robert Dale, Suffolk Herald, created around the year 1718, and still located at Ormsby; and Allen's History of the County, under Ormsby and Gunby.

Arms.—Azure, three quatrefoils (two and one,) and in chief a boar passant or, charged on the shoulder with a cross patée gules, with which the following coat is generally quartered, said to be the arms assumed by Sir Thomas Massingberd, Knight of St. John, in the reign of Henry VIII. Quarterly or and argent, on a cross humetté gules, between four lions rampant sable, two escallops of the first.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, featuring three quatrefoils (two above one), and at the top, a gold boar walking, marked on the shoulder with a red cross, generally linked to the following coat, thought to have been used by Sir Thomas Massingberd, Knight of St. John, during the reign of Henry VIII. Quarterly gold and silver, on a red cross with smaller arms, surrounded by four black lions standing, two scallops of the first.

Present Representative, The Rev. Francis Charles Massingberd.

Present Representative, The Rev. Francis Charles Massingberd.





Monson of Burton, Baron Monson 1728, Baronet 1611.

arms_page142a.jpg

"In the Isle" of Axholme "be now there 4 gentilmen of name, Sheffild, Candisch, Evers, and Mounsun. The lands of one Bellewodde became by marriage to this Mounson, a younger son to old Mounson of Lincolnshire. This old Mounson is in a maner the first avauncer of his family." Thus wrote Leland in his Itinerary. The Monsons however are clearly traced to the year 1378, as resident at East-Reson, in this county. They were afterwards seated at South Carlton, a village adjacent to Burton.

"In the Isle" of Axholme, there are now 4 gentlemen of note: Sheffield, Candish, Evers, and Mounson. The lands of one Bellewood were inherited by this Mounson, a younger son of the old Mounson from Lincolnshire. This old Mounson is somewhat considered the first to elevate his family." Thus wrote Leland in his Itinerary. However, the Monsons can be clearly traced back to the year 1378, as residents of East-Reson in this county. They later settled at South Carlton, a village near Burton.

See Leland's Itin., i. fol. 42; Allen's Lincolnshire, ii. 57; and Brydges's Collins, vii. 228.

See Leland's Itin., i. fol. 42; Allen's Lincolnshire, ii. 57; and Brydges's Collins, vii. 228.

Arms.—Or, two chevronels gules.

Arms.—Or, two red chevronels.

Present Representative, William John Monson, 7th Baron Monson.

Present Representative, William John Monson, 7th Baron Monson.





Whichcote of Aswarby, Baronet 1660.

arms_page142b.jpg

This is an ancient Shropshire house descended from William de Whichcote, of Whichcote, in that county, in 1255. In the reign of Edward IV., by marriage with the heiress of Tyrwhitt, the family became possessed of Harpswell in this county, which for a long time continued the residence of the Whichcotes.

This is an old house in Shropshire that comes from William de Whichcote of Whichcote in that county, dating back to 1255. During the reign of Edward IV, through marriage with the heiress of Tyrwhitt, the family acquired Harpswell in this county, which remained the home of the Whichcotes for a long time.

See Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 13; and Allen's History of Lincolnshire, i. 38.

See Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 13; and Allen's History of Lincolnshire, i. 38.

Arms.—Ermine, two boars passant in pale gules.

Coat of Arms.—White fur featuring two red boars standing on their hind legs, one positioned above the other.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas Whichcote, 7th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas Whichcote, 7th Baronet.





Anderson of Brocklesby, Earl of Yarborough 1837, Baron Yarborough 1794.

arms_page143.jpg

Roger Anderson of Wrawby, in this county, Esquire, living in the latter part of the fourteenth century, and who came from Northumberland, stands at the head of the pedigree. His great-grandson Henry, also of Wrawby, was grandfather of Sir Edmund Anderson of Flixborough, Knight, Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, who died in 1605. He was the ancestor of the present family, and of Sir Charles Anderson of Broughton in Lincolnshire, Baronet 1660, and of the Andersons of Eyworth in Bedfordshire, Baronets 1664, extinct in 1773. Brocklesby came from an heiress of Pelham, a younger branch of the Pelhams Earls of Chichester.

Roger Anderson of Wrawby, in this county, was a gentleman living in the late 14th century, who came from Northumberland, and he is the starting point of the family lineage. His great-grandson Henry, also from Wrawby, was the grandfather of Sir Edmund Anderson of Flixborough, a knight and the Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, who passed away in 1605. He was the ancestor of the current family, as well as of Sir Charles Anderson of Broughton in Lincolnshire, Baronet in 1660, and the Andersons of Eyworth in Bedfordshire, Baronet in 1664, which became extinct in 1773. Brocklesby came from an heiress of Pelham, a younger branch of the Pelhams, Earls of Chichester.

See Wotton's English Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 191, vol. iv. p. 427, and "The History of Lea," printed in 1841.

See Wotton's English Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 191, vol. iv. p. 427, and "The History of Lea," published in 1841.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three crosses flory sable.

Arms.—Silver background with a chevron between three black crosses that have flowered ends.

Present Representative, Charles Anderson Pelham, 3rd Earl of Yarborough.

Present Representative, Charles Anderson Pelham, 3rd Earl of Yarborough.





Bertie of Uffington, Earl of Lindsey 1626.

arms_page144.jpg

The ancient extraction of the Berties from Berstead in the county of Kent is proved by the Thurnham charters in the possession of Sir Edward Dering, and by various public records of undoubted authority; and, although the exact line of pedigree is by no means clear, there appears no reason to doubt the descent of this "undefamed house" from John or Bartholomew de Bereteghe, who were living in the 35th of Edward I. The marriage of Richard Bertie son of Robert, who died in 1500, with Katherine daughter of William Willoughby, last Lord Willoughby of Eresby, and widow of Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk, was, as is well known, the origin of the consequence of this right loyal family, five generations of whose history have been so agreeably illustrated by Lady Georgiana Bertie. Grimsthorpe, inherited from the Duchess of Suffolk from her paternal Willoughby ancestors, became the principal seat of the Berties, Barons Willoughby of Eresby and Lords Great Chamberlains of England, advanced in the person of Robert second Lord Willoughby to the Earldom of Lindsey by King Charles I. His great-grandson was created Duke of Ancaster and Kesteven in 1715, which titles became extinct on the decease of the fifth Duke in 1809. The Earldom of Lindsey and representation of the family thereupon devolved on the father of the present Earl, descended from the fifth son of the second Earl of Lindsey by his first wife.

The early history of the Berties from Berstead in Kent is documented by the Thurnham charters owned by Sir Edward Dering and various reliable public records. Although the exact lineage isn't entirely clear, there seems to be no reason to doubt that this "undefamed house" descended from John or Bartholomew de Bereteghe, who were alive during the 35th year of Edward I's reign. The marriage between Richard Bertie, son of Robert who died in 1500, and Katherine, daughter of William Willoughby, the last Lord Willoughby of Eresby, and widow of Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk, is well-known as the beginning of this prominent family. Their history has been delightfully illustrated over five generations by Lady Georgiana Bertie. Grimsthorpe, inherited from the Duchess of Suffolk through her paternal Willoughby ancestors, became the main residence of the Berties, Barons Willoughby of Eresby and Lords Great Chamberlains of England. Robert, the second Lord Willoughby, was elevated to the Earldom of Lindsey by King Charles I. His great-grandson was granted the title Duke of Ancaster and Kesteven in 1715, which became extinct after the fifth Duke passed away in 1809. The Earldom of Lindsey and the representation of the family then passed to the father of the current Earl, who is descended from the fifth son of the second Earl of Lindsey by his first wife.

Younger branch, the Earl of Abingdon 1682, Baron Norreys of Rycote 1572, descended from the second marriage of the second Earl of Lindsey and the heiress of Wray, whose mother was the sole heir of Francis Norreys, Earl of Berkshire, and Lord Norreys of Rycote.

Younger branch, the Earl of Abingdon 1682, Baron Norreys of Rycote 1572, is descended from the second marriage of the second Earl of Lindsey and the heiress of Wray, whose mother was the sole heir of Francis Norreys, Earl of Berkshire, and Lord Norreys of Rycote.

See Lady G. Bertie's "Five Generations of a Loyal House," 4to. 1845, and Brydges's Collins, vol. ii. p. 1, vol. iii. 628.

See Lady G. Bertie's "Five Generations of a Loyal House," 4to. 1845, and Brydges's Collins, vol. ii. p. 1, vol. iii. 628.

Arms.—Argent, three battering rams barways in pale azure, armed and garnished or. The "docquet or grant" in the fourth of Edward VI. gives the arms, Quarterly, 1 and 4, Argent, a battering ram azure, garnished or; 2 and 3, Sable a tower argent.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, featuring three blue battering rams arranged vertically, highlighted and detailed in gold. The "document or grant" from the fourth year of Edward VI describes the arms as, Quarterly, 1 and 4, Silver with a blue battering ram, accented in gold; 2 and 3, Black with a silver tower.

Present Representative, George Augustus Frederick Albemarle Bertie, 10th Earl of Lindsey.

Present Representative, George Augustus Frederick Albemarle Bertie, 10th Earl of Lindsey.





NORFOLK.

Knightly.

Wodehouse of Kimberley, Baron Wodehouse 1797, Baronet 1611.

arms_page146.jpg

"This family is very ancient, for they were gentlemen of good ranke in the time of King John, as it appeareth by many ancient grants and evidences of theirs which I have seen," wrote Peacham in his "Compleate Gentleman," in 1634. (p. 191.) The name is local, being derived from Wodehouse in Silfield, in this county; but as early as the reign of Henry III. the family had property in Kimberley, and in that of Henry IV. the manor was also inherited from the heiress of Fastolff.

"This family is very old, as they were gentlemen of good standing during the time of King John, as shown by many ancient documents and records I've seen," wrote Peacham in his "Compleate Gentleman," in 1634. (p. 191.) The name is local, coming from Wodehouse in Silfield, in this county; however, as early as the reign of Henry III, the family owned property in Kimberley, and during the reign of Henry IV, the manor was also inherited from the heiress of Fastolff.

See Blomefield's Norfolk, ed. 1739, vol. i. p. 751, for long extracts from the curious old pedigree in verse; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 164; and Brydges's Collins's Peerage, viii. 562.

See Blomefield's Norfolk, ed. 1739, vol. i. p. 751, for long extracts from the interesting old family tree in verse; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 164; and Brydges's Collins's Peerage, viii. 562.

Arms.—Sable, a chevron or, guttée de sang, between three cinquefoils ermine. This coat is said to have been augmented as now borne, by Henry V. in honour of John Wodehouse's valour at the Battle of Agincourt, the guttée de sang, not at present considered very good heraldry, being then added. The supporters, two wode or wild men, were also, it has been said, then first used.

Coat of Arms.—Black, featuring a gold chevron with blood drops, between three white five-petal flowers. This coat is believed to have been updated to its current design by Henry V in honor of John Wodehouse's courage at the Battle of Agincourt, with the blood drops, which are not considered great heraldry today, being added at that time. The supporters, two wild men, were also said to have been used for the first time then.

Present Representative, John Wodehouse, 3rd Baron Wodehouse, Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.

Present Representative, John Wodehouse, 3rd Baron Wodehouse, Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.





Walpole of Wolterton, Earl of Orford 1806, Baron 1723.

arms_page147.jpg

Walpole, in Mershland, in this county, gave name to this historical family, and here Joceline de Walpole was living in the reign of Stephen. Reginald de Walpole, in the time of Henry I. seems to have been lineal ancestor of the house. He was father of Richard, who married Emma, daughter of Walter de Hawton, or Houghton, which at a very early period became the family seat, and which, after the death of the third Earl of the first creation, passed to the issue of his aunt Mary, Viscountess Malpas, daughter of Sir Robert Walpole; whose descendant, the Marquess of Cholmondeley, is the present possessor.

Walpole, in Mershland, in this county, gave its name to this historical family, and Joceline de Walpole was living here during the reign of Stephen. Reginald de Walpole, during the time of Henry I, seems to have been the direct ancestor of the family. He was the father of Richard, who married Emma, the daughter of Walter de Hawton, or Houghton, which very early on became the family seat, and which, after the death of the third Earl of the first creation, was passed on to the descendants of his aunt Mary, Viscountess Malpas, daughter of Sir Robert Walpole; whose descendant, the Marquess of Cholmondeley, is the current owner.

See Blomefield, iii. 796, and iv. 708; also Brydges's Collins, v. 631.

See Blomefield, iii. 796, and iv. 708; also Brydges's Collins, v. 631.

Arms.—Or, on a fess between two chevrons sable three cross-crosslets of the first.

Coat of Arms.—Yellow, featuring a horizontal band between two black chevrons with three small crosses of the same color.

Present Representative, Horatio William Walpole, 4th Earl of Orford.

Present Representative, Horatio William Walpole, 4th Earl of Orford.





Berney of Kirby Beedon, Baronet 1620.

arms_page148.jpg

Berney, in the hundred of North Greenhow in this county, doubtless gave name to this ancient family, who are traced pretty nearly to the Conquest. Park Hall, the former seat, is in the parish of Reedham, and was acquired by the marriage of Sir Thomas de Berney with Margaret daughter and heir of Sir William de Reedham in the reign of Edward III.

Berney, in the hundred of North Greenhow in this county, surely gave its name to this old family, which can be traced back almost to the Conquest. Park Hall, their former home, is in the parish of Reedham and was

Younger branch, Berney of Morton Hall in this county, descended from a younger brother of the first Baronet.

Younger branch, Berney of Morton Hall in this county, descended from a younger brother of the first Baronet.

See Parkins's continuation of Blomefield's Norfolk, v. 1482; and Wotton's Baronetage, i. 378.

See Parkins's continuation of Blomefield's Norfolk, v. 1482; and Wotton's Baronetage, i. 378.

Arms.—Party per pale gules and azure, a cross engrailed ermine.

Coat of Arms.—Split vertically, red on one side and blue on the other, featuring a notched white cross.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Hanson Berney, 9th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Hanson Berney, 9th Baronet.





Astley, of Melton-Constable, Baron Hastings 1841, Baronet 1660.

arms_page149.jpg

Descended from the noble house of Astley Castle in Warwickshire, and traced to Philip de Estlega in the 12th of Henry II., and in the female line from the Constables of Melton-Constable, which estate came into the family by the second marriage of Thomas Lord Astley with Edith, third sister and coheir of Geffrey de Constable, in the time of Henry III. Astley Castle, the original seat, descended by an heiress to the Greys of Ruthin, afterwards Marquesses of Dorset, and Dukes of Suffolk. Hill-Morton in Warwickshire was also the seat of this family from the reign of Henry III.

Descended from the noble house of Astley Castle in Warwickshire, and traced back to Philip de Estlega during the 12th year of Henry II., and through the female line from the Constables of Melton-Constable, which estate came into the family through the second marriage of Thomas Lord Astley with Edith, the third sister and co-heir of Geffrey de Constable, in the time of Henry III. Astley Castle, the original seat, passed down by an heiress to the Greys of Ruthin, who later became Marquesses of Dorset and Dukes of Suffolk. Hill-Morton in Warwickshire was also the residence of this family since the reign of Henry III.

The Astleys formerly of Patishull in Staffordshire were the elder branch, sprung from the first marriage of Thomas Lord Astley, who was killed in the Barons' Wars at Evesham, (the 49th of Henry III.,) extinct 1771. The Astleys, now of Everley, in Wiltshire, Baronets 1821, descend from the second son of Walter Astley of Patishull, the father of the first Baronet of that line (1662).

The Astleys, originally from Patishull in Staffordshire, were the older branch that came from Thomas Lord Astley's first marriage. He was killed during the Barons' Wars at Evesham (in the 49th year of Henry III.) and the line ended in 1771. The Astleys now residing in Everley, Wiltshire, became Baronet in 1821 and are descendants of the second son of Walter Astley of Patishull, who was the father of the first Baronet of that line (1662).

See Parkins's Blomefield's Norfolk, v. 940; Thomas's Dugdale's Warwickshire, i. 19, 107; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 63; for Astleys of Patishull, Shaw's Staffordshire, ii. 287; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 368.

See Parkins's Blomefield's Norfolk, v. 940; Thomas's Dugdale's Warwickshire, i. 19, 107; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 63; for Astleys of Patishull, Shaw's Staffordshire, ii. 287; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 368.

Arms.—Azure, a cinquefoil ermine within a border engrailed or. The Patishull and Everley family omit the border, and it was thus borne by the head of the house in the reign of Richard II. Thomas de Astley, at the same period, differenced his coat by a label of three points or, charged with two bars gules. (Rolls.)

Arms.—Blue, a cinquefoil of ermine within a wavy gold border. The Patishull and Everley family does not feature the border, and this was how the head of the house displayed it during the reign of Richard II. Around the same time, Thomas de Astley modified his coat by adding a label with three points in gold, marked with two red bars. (Rolls.)

Present Representative, Jacob Henry Delaval Astley, 3rd Baron Hastings.

Present Representative, Jacob Henry Delaval Astley, 3rd Baron Hastings.





Bedingfeld of Oxborough, Baronet 1660.

arms_page150.jpg

Traditionally a Norman family seated at Bedingfeld, in Suffolk, soon after the Conquest. Oxburgh, or Oxborough, has been the residence of this eminently knightly house from the reign of Edward IV., when it came by the marriage of Edmund Bedingfeld with Margaret, daughter of Robert Tudenham, and to whom licence was granted to build the walls and towers of Oxburgh in the year 1482. The baronetcy was conferred by Charles II. as a mark of his favour and in consideration of the eminent loyalty and consequent sufferings of the family during the usurpation. The Bedingfelds of Ditchingham, in this county, are a younger branch parted from the parent stem as early as the middle of the fourteenth century.

Originally a Norman family based at Bedingfeld in Suffolk, they settled there soon after the Conquest. Oxburgh, or Oxborough, has been the home of this distinguished knightly family since the reign of Edward IV., when Edmund Bedingfeld married Margaret, the daughter of Robert Tudenham, who received permission to build the walls and towers of Oxburgh in 1482. The baronetcy was granted by Charles II. as a sign of his favor and in recognition of the family's notable loyalty and the hardships they endured during the usurpation. The Bedingfelds of Ditchingham, in this county, are a younger branch that separated from the main lineage as early as the mid-fourteenth century.

See Blomefield, iii. 482; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 212; and the Rev. G. H. M'Gill's account of Oxburgh Hall in the Proceedings of the Norfolk Archeological Society.

See Blomefield, iii. 482; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 212; and the Rev. G. H. M'Gill's account of Oxburgh Hall in the Proceedings of the Norfolk Archaeological Society.

Arms.—Ermine, an eagle displayed gules, armed or.

Arms.—Ermine, a red eagle with wings spread, talons in gold.

Present Representative, Sir Henry George Paston Bedingfeld, 7th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Henry George Paston Bedingfeld, 7th Baronet.





Howard of East-Winch, Duke of Norfolk 1483.

arms_page151.jpg

The great historical house of Howard in point of antiquity must yield precedence to many other English families: it can only be traced with certainty to Sir William Howard, Judge of the Common Pleas in 1297. Norfolk appears to be the county where this great family should be noticed, the Duke of Norfolk still possessing property in the county of his dukedom derived from his ancestors of the house of Bigod. In the fourteenth century, by the match with the heiress of Mowbray, the foundation of the honors and consequence of the Howards was laid, the first Duke being the son of Margaret, daughter and coheir of Thomas de Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk. The Sussex estates came from the heiress of Fitzalan, Earl of Arundel, in the reign of Edward VI.; Worksop from the Talbots; Greystoke and Morpeth from the Dacres.

The prestigious historical family of Howard, when it comes to age, falls behind many other English families: it can only be reliably traced back to Sir William Howard, who was a Judge of the Common Pleas in 1297. Norfolk seems to be the county where this notable family should be recognized, with the Duke of Norfolk still owning land in the county that comes from his ancestors of the Bigod family. In the fourteenth century, the marriage to the heiress of Mowbray established the foundation of the honors and significance of the Howards, with the first Duke being the son of Margaret, the daughter and co-heir of Thomas de Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk. The estates in Sussex were inherited from the heiress of Fitzalan, Earl of Arundel, during the reign of Edward VI.; Worksop came from the Talbots; and Greystoke and Morpeth were inherited from the Dacres.

All the English Peers of the house of Howard are traced to a common ancestor in Thomas, the second Duke of Norfolk, who died in 1524. The Duke of Norfolk, the Earls of Suffolk and Carlisle, descend from his first wife, and the Earl of Effingham from the second. The Howards of Greystoke, in Cumberland, are a younger branch of the present ducal house. The Howards of Corby Castle, in the same county, descend from the second son of "Belted Will," the ancestor of the house of Carlisle.

All the English peers of the house of Howard can be traced back to a common ancestor, Thomas, the second Duke of Norfolk, who passed away in 1524. The Duke of Norfolk, the Earls of Suffolk and Carlisle, are descended from his first wife, while the Earl of Effingham comes from his second wife. The Howards of Greystoke, in Cumberland, are a younger branch of the current ducal house. The Howards of Corby Castle, also in Cumberland, are descendants of the second son of "Belted Will," who is the ancestor of the house of Carlisle.

Extinct branches. The Viscount Bindon; the Earls of Northampton, Nottingham, and Stafford; and Lord Howard of Escrick.

Extinct branches: The Viscount Bindon; the Earls of Northampton, Nottingham, and Stafford; and Lord Howard of Escrick.

See Brydges's Collins, i. 50, for the Duke of Norfolk; iii. 147, for the Earl of Suffolk; iii. 501, for the Earl of Carlisle; and iv. 264, for the Earl of Effingham. See also Cartwright's Rape of Bramber, p. 185; and Dallaway's Rape of Arundel; Hunter's South Yorkshire, ii. 10. For the Howard Monuments at East-Winch, see Weever's Funeral Monuments, p. 842-9; for their state in the 18th century Parkins's Blomefield's Norfolk, iv. 746; and Topographer and Genealogist, ii. 90. For the Earl of Carlisle, see Hodgson's History of Northumberland, ii. pt. 2, p. 381; for Howard of Corby, the same vol. p. 477. See also "Historical Anecdotes of some of the Howard Family," 12mo. 1769; Tierney's Castle and Town of Arundel, 8vo. 1834; and Mr. Howard's "Indication of Memorials, &c. of the Howard Family," fol. 1834.

See Brydges's Collins, i. 50, for the Duke of Norfolk; iii. 147 for the Earl of Suffolk; iii. 501 for the Earl of Carlisle; and iv. 264, for the Earl of Effingham. Also check out Cartwright's Rape of Bramber, p. 185; Dallaway's Rape of Arundel; and Hunter's South Yorkshire, ii. 10. For the Howard Monuments at East-Winch, see Weever's Funeral Monuments, p. 842-9; for their state in the 18th century, refer to Parkins's Blomefield's Norfolk, iv. 746; and Topographer and Genealogist, ii. 90. For the Earl of Carlisle, see Hodgson's History of Northumberland, ii. pt. 2, p. 381; for Howard of Corby, the same volume, p. 477. Also, see "Historical Anecdotes of some of the Howard Family," 12mo. 1769; Tierney's Castle and Town of Arundel, 8vo. 1834; and Mr. Howard's "Indication of Memorials, &c. of the Howard Family," fol. 1834.

Arms.—Gules, a bend between six cross-crosslets fitcheé argent, on an escucheon a demi-lion pierced through the mouth with an arrow, within a double tressure flory counter-flory gules, granted by patent 5 Henry VIII. to Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk, in remembrance of the victory gained over the Scots at Flodden. The present coat was borne by Sir John Howard in the reign of Edward II., and by Mr. Howard in those of Edward II. and Richard III.: it has been conjectured, from the similarity of this coat with that of the Botilers, Barons of Wem, (Gules, a fess cheeky argent and sable between six crosses pateé fitchée argent,) that Sir William Howard the Judge was descended from the Hords, stewards to these Barons: it is observable that none of the Howards ever prefixed the de to their name, a fact which opposes their derivation from Hawarden in Flintshire. (Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, pp. 53 note.)

Coat of Arms.—Red, with a diagonal stripe between six small silver crosses with pointed ends, on a shield featuring a half-lion pierced through the mouth with an arrow, surrounded by a double floral border in red, granted by patent 5 Henry VIII. to Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk, to commemorate the victory over the Scots at Flodden. The current coat was used by Sir John Howard during Edward II's reign, and by Mr. Howard during the reigns of Edward II and Richard III. It has been suggested, due to the similarity of this coat with that of the Botilers, Barons of Wem (Red, a checkered band in silver and black between six crosses with rounded ends in silver), that Sir William Howard the Judge was descended from the Hords, who were stewards to these Barons. It's interesting to note that none of the Howards ever added the de to their name, which contradicts their supposed connection to Hawarden in Flintshire. (Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, pp. 53 note.)

Present Representative, Henry Fitzalan Howard, 15th Duke of Norfolk.

Present Representative, Henry Fitzalan Howard, 15th Duke of Norfolk.





Gurney of Keswick.

arms_page153.jpg

This is a younger branch of the Gurneys of West Barsham in this county, whose principal male line became extinct in 1661, West Barsham came from the heiress of Waunci about the reign of Edward III. Previous to that time the Gurneys appear to have been seated at Harpley, also in Norfolk, as early as 1206, and are traced for two descents beyond that period, being (as there appears no reason to doubt) descended from the great Norman baronial house of the name. The present family may be said to have been refounded by John Gurney, an eminent silk-merchant at Norwich, about 1670. Keswick was purchased in 1747. The Gournays of Somersetshire, represented by the Earls of Egmont, may have been a distinct family; their arms were, Paly of six or and azure. Dugdale, however, gives them a common ancestor with the former house. (Baronage, i. 429.)

This is a younger branch of the Gurneys from West Barsham in this county, whose main male line ended in 1661. West Barsham came from the heiress of Waunci around the time of Edward III. Before that, the Gurneys seem to have been settled at Harpley, also in Norfolk, as early as 1206, and they can be traced back for two additional generations, being (as there's no reason to doubt) descended from the prominent Norman baronial family of the same name. The current family can be considered to have been reestablished by John Gurney, a notable silk merchant in Norwich, around 1670. Keswick was bought in 1747. The Gournays of Somersetshire, represented by the Earls of Egmont, may be a separate family; their coat of arms was Paly of six or and azure. However, Dugdale suggests they share a common ancestor with the earlier house. (Baronage, i. 429.)

See the "Records of the House of Gournay," privately printed, 4to., 1848, and particularly, for the Norman origin of the family page 293 of that work. For the Gournays of Somersetshire, see the History of the House of Ivery. London, 1742, vol. ii. p. 473,

See the "Records of the House of Gournay," privately printed, 4to., 1848, and especially for the Norman origin of the family on page 293 of that book. For the Gournays of Somersetshire, check the History of the House of Ivery. London, 1742, vol. ii. p. 473,

Arms.—Argent, a cross engrailed gules, in the first quarter a cinquefoil azure.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a red cross that has curved edges; in the top left corner, there's a blue cinquefoil.

Present Representative, Hudson Gurney, Esq.

Present Rep, Hudson Gurney, Esq.





De Grey of Merton, Baron Walsingham 1780.

arms_page154.jpg

This ancient family is supposed to have the same origin as the noble Norman house of Grey, now represented by the Earl of Stamford; it is traced to William de Grey, of Cavendish, in Suffolk; whose grandson Sir Thomas was seated about 1306 at Cornerth in that county, by his marriage with the heiress of the same name; their son and heir married the coheiress of Baynard, and thus became possessed of Merton, the long-continued seat of this family.

This ancient family is believed to share the same origin as the noble Norman house of Grey, currently represented by the Earl of Stamford. Its lineage can be traced back to William de Grey of Cavendish, Suffolk, whose grandson, Sir Thomas, settled in Cornerth around 1306 through his marriage to the heiress of the same name. Their son and heir married the coheiress of Baynard, which led to them acquiring Merton, the long-standing residence of this family.

See Blomefield, i. 576; and Brydges's Collins, vii. 510.

See Blomefield, i. 576; and Brydges's Collins, vii. 510.

Arms.—Barry of six argent and azure, in chief three annulets gules. The ancient coat of Cornerth, Azure, a fess between two chevronels or, (which was doubtless derived from their superior lords the Baynards,) was borne for many generations by the ancestors of this family.

Coat of Arms.—Split into six parts, silver and blue, with three red rings at the top. The traditional coat of Cornerth, blue, with a gold stripe between two gold chevrons, (likely inherited from their higher-ranking lords, the Baynards,) was passed down through many generations of this family's ancestors.

Present Representative, Thomas de Grey, 5th Baron Walsingham.

Present Representative, Thomas de Grey, 5th Baron Walsingham.





Bacon of Raveningham, Premier Baronet of England, of Redgrave, Suffolk, 1611.

arms_page155.jpg

This family is said to have been established at a period shortly subsequent to the Conquest at Letheringsett, in Norfolk, but is better known as a Suffolk family, having been seated at Monks' Bradfield, in that county, in the reign of Richard I. Redgrave was granted by Henry VIII. in the 36th year of his reign, to the great Sir Nicholas Bacon, who with Francis his son, Viscount St. Alban's, were the principal ornaments of this family. Raveningham descended to the Bacons from the heiress of the ancient family of Castell, or de Castello, about the middle of the 18th century.

This family is said to have been founded shortly after the Conquest in Letheringsett, Norfolk, but is more well-known as a Suffolk family, having settled in Monks' Bradfield in that county during the reign of Richard I. Redgrave was granted to the esteemed Sir Nicholas Bacon by Henry VIII in the 36th year of his reign, along with his son Francis, Viscount St. Alban's, who were the main figures of this family. Raveningham passed down to the Bacons from the heiress of the ancient family of Castell, or de Castello, around the middle of the 18th century.

See Parkins's Continuation of Blomefield's Norfolk, iv. 262 Wotton's Baronetage, i. 1, and ii. 72.

See Parkins's Continuation of Blomefield's Norfolk, iv. 262 Wotton's Baronetage, i. 1, and ii. 72.

Arms.—Gules, on a chief argent two mullets pierced sable. This coat was borne by Sir Edmund Bacon, in the reign of Edward II., and by M. Bacon in that of Edward III. (Rolls.) A brass circa A.D. 1320, at Gorleston church, Suffolk, supposed to represent one of this family, bears five lozenges in bend on the field, besides the mullets in chief: see Boutell's Brasses, p. 36.

Coat of Arms.—Red, with a silver upper section that has two black stars. This coat of arms was used by Sir Edmund Bacon during the reign of Edward II, and by M. Bacon during the reign of Edward III. (Rolls.) A brass from around A.D. 1320, found in Gorleston church, Suffolk, is thought to represent a member of this family and features five diamond shapes arranged diagonally on the field, along with the stars in the upper section: see Boutell's Brasses, p. 36.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Hickman Bacon, 11th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Hickman Bacon, 11th Baronet.





Jerningham of Cossey, Baron Stafford, restored 1824, Baronet 1621.

arms_page156.jpg

The ancestors of this ancient house were seated at Horham in Suffolk in the 13th century, "knights of high esteem in those parts," saith Camden, and traced to Sir Hubert Jernegan of that place. Somerleyton, in the same county, derived from the heiress of Fitzosbert, afterwards became the family seat, and so continued until the extinction of the elder line. Cossey was granted to Sir Henry Jerningham, (son of Sir Edward Jerningham, by his second wife,) in 1547, by Queen Mary, "being the first that appeared openly for her after the death of Edward VI." He was the ancestor of Lord Stafford.

The ancestors of this old house were based in Horham, Suffolk, in the 13th century, "knights of high repute in those parts," according to Camden, and traced back to Sir Hubert Jernegan from there. Somerleyton, also in Suffolk, came from the heiress of Fitzosbert and later became the family home, continuing as such until the elder line died out. Cossey was granted to Sir Henry Jerningham (son of Sir Edward Jerningham by his second wife) in 1547 by Queen Mary, "being the first who openly supported her after the death of Edward VI." He was the ancestor of Lord Stafford.

See Weever's Ancient Funerall Monuments, p. 769; Blomefield's Norfolk, i. p. 660; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 450; and Suckling's History of Suffolk, ii. p. 46.

See Weever's Ancient Funerall Monuments, p. 769; Blomefield's Norfolk, i. p. 660; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 450; and Suckling's History of Suffolk, ii. p. 46.

Arms.—Argent, three buckles gules.

Arms.—Silver, three red buckles.

Present Representative, Henry Valentine Stafford Jerningham, 9th Baron Stafford.

Present Representative, Henry Valentine Stafford Jerningham, 9th Baron Stafford.





Townshend of Rainham, Marquess Townshend 1787; Baron 1661; Viscount 1682.

arms_page157.jpg

In 1377, the ancestor of this family was of Snoring Magna in this county. In 1398, John Townshend settled at Rainham, which according to some accounts accrued to them by the heiress of Havile, but the pedigree as given by Collins cannot be relied on, neither can the defamatory account of Leland, who says—"the grandfather of Townsende now living was a meane man of substance." The truth seems to be that the family is old, but not of great account before the time of Sir Walter de Townsend, who married Maud Scogan, and flourished about the year 1400.

In 1377, the ancestor of this family lived in Snoring Magna in this county. In 1398, John Townshend moved to Rainham, which some say he inherited from the heiress of Havile, but the lineage provided by Collins isn't trustworthy, and Leland's negative description, stating that "the grandfather of Townsende currently living was an ordinary man of some means," is also questionable. The reality seems to be that the family is old, but not particularly significant before the time of Sir Walter de Townsend, who married Maud Scogan and was active around the year 1400.

See Blomefield, iii. 815; Brydges's Collins, ii. 454; and Leland's Itinerary, iv. p. 13.

See Blomefield, iii. 815; Brydges's Collins, ii. 454; and Leland's Itinerary, iv. p. 13.

Arms.—Azure, a chevron ermine between three escallops argent.

Coat of Arms.—Blue field with a white fur chevron between three silver scallops.

Present Representative, John Villiers Stuart Townshend, 5th Marquess Townshend.

Present Representative, John Villiers Stuart Townshend, 5th Marquess Townshend.





NORTHAMPTONSHIRE.

Knightly.

Wake of Courteenhall, Baronet 1621.

arms_page158.jpg

This is a younger branch of the very ancient baronial house of Wake, who were Lincolnshire Barons in the reign of Henry I. Sir Hugh Wake was lord of Deeping in the county of Lincoln, and of Blisworth in this county, by gift of his father, Baldwin fourth Lord Wake. He died in 1315, and was the direct ancestor of the present Baronet. See memoir of the family of Wake privately printed in 1833, but written by Archbishop Wake; and Wotton's Baronetage, i. 465.

This is a newer branch of the very old baronial house of Wake, who were Barons in Lincolnshire during the reign of Henry I. Sir Hugh Wake was the lord of Deeping in Lincolnshire and of Blisworth in this county, given to him by his father, Baldwin, the fourth Lord Wake. He passed away in 1315 and was the direct ancestor of the current Baronet. See the memoir of the Wake family, printed privately in 1833 and written by Archbishop Wake, and Wotton's Baronetage, i. 465.

Arms.—Or, two bars gules, in chief three torteauxes. This coat was borne by Hugh Wake in the reign of Henry III., and again by Sir John Wake in that of Edward II. Sir Hugh Wake at the latter period differenced his arms by a canton azure. His uncle reversed the colours gules and argent, the field being gules. M. Thomas Wake de Blisworth in the reign of Edward III. bore the same arms, with a border engrailed sable. (Rolls of the dates.)

Arms.—Gold, with two red bars above three circles. This coat was used by Hugh Wake during the reign of Henry III and later by Sir John Wake under Edward II. Sir Hugh Wake updated his arms at that time by adding a blue canton. His uncle changed the colors to red and silver, with the background being red. M. Thomas Wake de Blisworth, during Edward III's reign, used the same arms, with a notched black border. (Rolls of the dates.)

Present Representative, Sir William Wake, 11th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir William Wake, 11th Baronet.





Brudenell of Dene, Earl of Cardigan 1661; Baron 1627; Baronet 1611.

arms_page159.jpg

William de Bredenhill, seated at Dodington in Oxfordshire, in the reign of Edward I., and the owner of lands at Aynho in this county at the same period, is the first ascertained ancestor of the Brudenells, whose principal consequence however must be traced to Sir Robert Brudenell, Chief Justice of the King's Bench in the reign of Henry VII., who married a coheiress of Entwisell, and thus became possessed of Dene and of Stanton Wyvill in the county of Leicester.

William de Bredenhill, sitting at Dodington in Oxfordshire during the reign of Edward I, and owning lands at Aynho in the same county at that time, is the first verified ancestor of the Brudenells. However, their main significance can be traced back to Sir Robert Brudenell, Chief Justice of the King's Bench in the reign of Henry VII, who married a coheiress of Entwisell, thereby acquiring Dene and Stanton Wyvill in the county of Leicester.

See the pedigree of this family in Nichols's History of Leicestershire, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 807; see also Brydges's Collins, iii. 487.

See the family background in Nichols's History of Leicestershire, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 807; also check Brydges's Collins, iii. 487.

Younger branch. The Marquess of Ailesbury (1821), descended from Thomas, fourth son of George fourth Earl of Cardigan, and the Lady Elizabeth Bruce, eldest daughter of Thomas second Earl of Ailesbury.

Younger branch. The Marquess of Ailesbury (1821), descended from Thomas, the fourth son of George, the fourth Earl of Cardigan, and Lady Elizabeth Bruce, the eldest daughter of Thomas, the second Earl of Ailesbury.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron gules between three morions azure.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a red chevron between three blue helmets.

Present Representative, James Thomas Brudenell, 7th Earl of Cardigan, K.C.B.

Present Representative, James Thomas Brudenell, 7th Earl of Cardigan, K.C.B.





Knightley of Fawsley, Baronet 1798.

arms_page160.jpg

The first recorded ancestor of this ancient family is Rainald, mesne lord of Knightley, in the county of Stafford, under Earl Roger, in the time of William the Conqueror, as appears by Domesday Book. That estate went out of the family by an heiress who married Robert de Peshall, about the reign of Edward III., and the Knightleys removed to Gnowsall, in the same county, in the 17th of Richard II. (1394). Fawsley was purchased in the 3rd of Henry V. (1415-16). It is thus mentioned by Leland: "Mr. Knightley, a man of great lands, hath his principal house at Foullesle, but it is no very sumptuous thing." (Itin. i. fol. 11.)

The first recorded ancestor of this ancient family is Rainald, who was the mesne lord of Knightley in Staffordshire, under Earl Roger during the time of William the Conqueror, as noted in the Domesday Book. That estate left the family when an heiress married Robert de Peshall around the reign of Edward III., and the Knightleys moved to Gnowsall in the same county in the 17th year of Richard II. (1394). Fawsley was bought in the 3rd year of Henry V. (1415-16). Leland mentions it like this: "Mr. Knightley, a man of great lands, has his main house at Foullesle, but it isn’t very magnificent." (Itin. i. fol. 11.)

See Baker's Northamptonshire, i. 381. Blakeway (Sheriffs of Salop, p. 103) asserts that "the Knightleys appear to have been a branch of the Shirleys," an assumption without any foundation except the similarity of their arms.

See Baker's Northamptonshire, i. 381. Blakeway (Sheriffs of Salop, p. 103) claims that "the Knightleys seem to have been a branch of the Shirleys," a statement that has no supporting evidence beyond the resemblance of their coats of arms.

Arms.—Quarterly ermine, and paly of six or and gules. This coat was borne as early as 1301-2 (30th Ed. I.) by Sir Robert de Knyteley: it is also borne by Cotes of Cotes, co. Stafford, probably from family connection.

Arms.—Quarterly ermine, and paly of six or and gules. This coat of arms was first recorded as early as 1301-2 (30th Ed. I.) by Sir Robert de Knyteley; it is also used by Cotes of Cotes, co. Stafford, probably because of a family connection.

Present Representative, Sir Rainald Knightley, 3rd Baronet, M. P. for South Northamptonshire.

Present Representative, Sir Rainald Knightley, 3rd Baronet, M.P. for South Northamptonshire.





Spencer of Althorpe, Earl Spencer 1765.

arms_page161.jpg

The Spencers claim a collateral descent from the ancient baronial house of Le Despenser, a claim which, without being irreconcileable perhaps with the early pedigrees of that family, admits of very grave doubts and considerable difficulties. It seems to be admitted that they descend from Henry Spencer, who, having been educated in the Abbey of Evesham, obtained from the abbot in the reign of Henry VI. a lease of the domains and tithes of Badby in this county, and was induced to settle there. His son removed to Hodnell in Warwickshire, his grandson to Rodburn in the same county, his great-grandson Sir John purchased Althorpe in 1508. The Spencers of Claverdon, co. Warwick (extinct 1685), were a younger branch. The Dukes of Marlborough (1702) represent the elder line of this family.

The Spencers claim a collateral descent from the ancient baronial house of Le Despenser, a claim that, while not completely contradicting the early family pedigrees, raises significant doubts and challenges. It seems agreed that they trace back to Henry Spencer, who, after being educated in the Abbey of Evesham, secured a lease of the lands and tithes of Badby in this county from the abbot during the reign of Henry VI and decided to settle there. His son moved to Hodnell in Warwickshire, his grandson to Rodburn in the same county, and his great-grandson Sir John purchased Althorpe in 1508. The Spencers of Claverdon, co. Warwick (extinct 1685), were a younger branch. The Dukes of Marlborough (1702) represent the elder line of this family.

See Baker's Northamptonshire, i. 106; and Brydges's Collins, i. 378.

See Baker's Northamptonshire, i. 106; and Brydges's Collins, i. 378.

The poet Spenser boasted that he belonged to this house; though, says Baker, "the precise link of genealogical connexion cannot now perhaps be ascertained."

The poet Spenser claimed that he was part of this family; however, Baker notes, "the exact link of genealogical connection can't be determined now."

Arms.—Quarterly, first and fourth argent, second and third gules, a fret or, over all a bend sable charged with three escallops of the first. This coat, which is differenced from the ancient baronial arms by the three escallop shells, was used by Henry Spencer of Badby, who sealed his will with it. In 1504 another coat was granted, viz. Azure, a fess ermine between six sea-mew's heads erased argent, but the more ancient arms have been generally borne by the Spencers.

Coat of Arms.—Quartered: the first and fourth sections are silver, the second and third are red, featuring a gold fret. Over all, there is a black diagonal stripe that has three silver scallop shells on it. This coat, which differs from the old baronial arms due to the inclusion of the three scallop shells, was used by Henry Spencer of Badby, who sealed his will with it. In 1504, another coat was granted, described as blue, with a white fur stripe between six silver sea gull heads cut off, but the older arms have generally been used by the Spencers.

Present Representative, John Poyntz Spencer, 5th Earl Spencer.

Present Representative, John Poyntz Spencer, 5th Earl Spencer.





Rokeby of Arthingworth.

arms_page162.jpg

This is a junior branch of the Rokebys of Rokeby in Yorkshire, a knightly race immortalized by Scott. The principal line has been long extinct. Sir Thomas Rokeby was Sheriff of Yorkshire in the eighth of Henry IV. The family was seated in the parish of Ecclesfield, and also at Sandal-Parva, in South Yorkshire, where William Rokeby was Rector in the reign of Henry VII. In 1512 he became Archbishop of Dublin. His brother Ralph wrote the history of the family, now in possession of Mr. Rokeby of Arthingworth, and which is printed in Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. i. p. 158. The present family acquired Arthingworth from the Langhams by marriage in the end of the seventeenth century.

This is a junior branch of the Rokebys of Rokeby in Yorkshire, a knightly family made famous by Scott. The main line has been extinct for a long time. Sir Thomas Rokeby was the Sheriff of Yorkshire in the eighth year of Henry IV's reign. The family lived in the parish of Ecclesfield and also at Sandal-Parva in South Yorkshire, where William Rokeby was Rector during Henry VII's reign. In 1512, he became the Archbishop of Dublin. His brother Ralph wrote the family's history, which is now owned by Mr. Rokeby of Arthingworth and printed in Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. i. p. 158. The current family acquired Arthingworth from the Langhams through marriage at the end of the seventeenth century.

See Hunter's South Yorkshire, i. p. 199.

See Hunter's South Yorkshire, i. p. 199.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three rooks sable, borne by Mons. Thomas de Rokeby in the reigns of Edward III. and Richard II. (Rolls of the dates.)

Coat of Arms.—Silver with a chevron between three black rooks, used by Mons. Thomas de Rokeby during the reigns of Edward III and Richard II. (Rolls of the dates.)

Present Representative, the Rev. Henry Ralph Rokeby.

Present Representative, Rev. Henry Ralph Rokeby.





Maunsell of Thorpe-Malsor.

arms_page163.jpg

The curious poetical history of this family, preserved in "Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica," claims one "Saher," there written "Sier, the syer of us all," as their ancestor: he is stated to have been the son of Ralph Maunsel, who was living in Buckinghamshire in the 14th of Henry II. (1167). Thickthornes in Chicheley in that county appears to have been the residence of the Maunsells, and also Turvey in Bedfordshire. These lands were sold by William the son of Sampson le Maunsel of Turvey to William Mordaunt in 1287. The Maunsells afterwards settled at Bury-End in Chicheley, and in 1622 at Thorpe-Malsor.

The interesting poetic history of this family, recorded in "Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica," mentions one "Saher," noted there as "Sier, the syer of us all," as their ancestor. He is said to have been the son of Ralph Maunsel, who lived in Buckinghamshire during the reign of Henry II (1167). The Maunsells appear to have lived at Thickthornes in Chicheley in that county, as well as in Turvey in Bedfordshire. These lands were sold by William, the son of Sampson le Maunsel of Turvey, to William Mordaunt in 1287. The Maunsells later settled at Bury-End in Chicheley and in 1622 at Thorpe-Malsor.

Elder Branches. 1. Maunsell of Muddlescombe, co. Carmarthen, Baronet 1621-2. 2. The extinct Barons Maunsell, created 1711, extinct 1744.

Elder Branches. 1. Maunsell of Muddlescombe, Carmarthen, Baronet 1621-2. 2. The now-defunct Barons Maunsell, created in 1711, became extinct in 1744.

Younger Branch. Maunsell of Cosgrave in this county, which came from the coheiress of Furtho.

Younger Branch. Maunsell of Cosgrave in this county, which came from the coheiress of Furtho.

See Coll. Topog. et Genealog. i. p. 389; Baker's Northamptonshire, ii. p. 132; and Memoirs of the family, an unfinished work privately printed in 1850 by William W. Maunsell, esq.

See Coll. Topog. et Genealog. i. p. 389; Baker's Northamptonshire, ii. p. 132; and Memoirs of the family, an unfinished work privately printed in 1850 by William W. Maunsell, esq.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three maunches sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver field with a chevron between three black maunches.

Present Representative, Thomas Philip Maunsell, Esq. late M. P. for North Northamptonshire.

Present Representative, Thomas Philip Maunsell, Esq., former M.P. for North Northamptonshire.





Gentle.

Isham of Lamport, Baronet 1627.

arms_page164.jpg

The name is local, from Isham in the hundred of Orlingbury in this county, where an elder branch of the family was seated soon after the Conquest. Robert Isham, who died in 1424, is however the first ancestor from whom the pedigree can with certainty be deduced. He was Escheator of the county of Northampton, and was of Picheley (a lordship contiguous to Isham) in the first of Henry V. Lamport was purchased by John Isham, the immediate ancestor of the present family, fourth son of Sir Euseby Isham, of Picheley, Knight, in the year 1559. He was an eminent merchant of London.

The name comes from Isham in the Orlingbury area of this county, where an older branch of the family settled shortly after the Conquest. Robert Isham, who died in 1424, is the first ancestor from whom we can definitively trace the family tree. He served as Escheator for Northamptonshire and was from Picheley (a lordship next to Isham) during the first year of Henry V's reign. Lamport was bought by John Isham, the immediate ancestor of the current family, who was the fourth son of Sir Euseby Isham of Picheley, Knight, in 1559. He was a prominent merchant in London.

See Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 28.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. 2, p. 28.

Arms.—Gules, a fess and in chief three piles wavy argent. This coat was borne by Robert de Isham in the 2nd of Richard II.

Arms.—Red, with a band and above it three wavy silver shapes. This coat was used by Robert de Isham in the second year of Richard II.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Edmund Isham, 10th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Edmund Isham, 10th Baronet.





Palmer of Carlton, Baronet 1660.

arms_page165a.jpg

This family appears to have been founded by the law early in the fifteenth century, and descends from William Palmer, who was established at the present seat of Carlton in the ninth of Henry IV. The celebrated Sir Geoffry Palmer, Attorney-General to Charles II. was the first Baronet.

This family seems to have been established by law in the early fifteenth century and descends from William Palmer, who settled at the current location of Carlton in the ninth year of Henry IV. The notable Sir Geoffry Palmer, who served as Attorney-General to Charles II, was the first Baronet.

See Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 19; and Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 543.

See Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 19; and Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 543.

Arms.—Sable, a chevron or between three crescents argent.

Emblems.—Black background with a gold chevron between three silver crescent shapes.

Present Representative, Sir Geoffrey Palmer, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Geoffrey Palmer, 8th Baronet.





Fane of Apthorp, Earl of Westmoreland 1642.

arms_page165b.jpg

The Fanes or Vanes are said to have originated from Wales; in the reign of Henry VI. they were seated at Hilden in Tunbridge, in Kent, by a marriage with the Peshalls. In 1574 Sir Thomas Fane married Mary daughter and heir of Henry Neville, Lord Abergavenny; hence the importance of the family, and the Earldom of Westmoreland, the ancient honour of the house of Neville. Apthorp came from the heiress of Mildmay, about the end of the reign of Queen Elizabeth.

The Fanes, or Vanes, are said to have come from Wales. During Henry VI’s reign, they settled in Hilden, Tunbridge, Kent, through a marriage with the Peshalls. In 1574, Sir Thomas Fane married Mary, the daughter and heir of Henry Neville, Lord Abergavenny, which is why the family became significant, along with the Earldom of Westmoreland, an ancient honor belonging to the Neville family. Apthorp came from the heiress of Mildmay around the end of Queen Elizabeth's reign.

Younger Branches. Fane of Wormesley, Oxfordshire, descended from Henry Fane, Esq., younger brother of Thomas eighth Earl of Westmoreland. The Duke of Cleveland (1833) and Sir Henry Vane, of Hutton Hall in Cumberland, Baronet (1786), descend from John younger brother of Richard Fane, ancestor of the Earl of Westmoreland.

Younger Branches. Fane of Wormesley, Oxfordshire, descended from Henry Fane, Esq., the younger brother of Thomas, the eighth Earl of Westmoreland. The Duke of Cleveland (1833) and Sir Henry Vane, of Hutton Hall in Cumberland, Baronet (1786), descend from John, the younger brother of Richard Fane, who is the ancestor of the Earl of Westmoreland.

See Brydges's Collins, iii. 283, and iv. 499; Hasted's Kent, ii. 265; and Blore's Rutlandshire, p. 103.

See Brydges's Collins, iii. 283, and iv. 499; Hasted's Kent, ii. 265; and Blore's Rutlandshire, p. 103.

Arms.—Azure, three right-hand gauntlets or.

Arms.—Blue, three right-hand gauntlets or.

Present Representative, Francis William Henry Fane, 12th Earl of Westmoreland.

Present Representative, Francis William Henry Fane, 12th Earl of Westmoreland.





NORTHUMBERLAND.

Knightly.

Clavering of Callaly Castle.

arms_page167.jpg

Robert Fitz-Roger, Baron of Warkworth, the ancestor of this great Norman family, was father of John, who assumed the name of "Clavering," from a lordship in Essex, as it is said, by the appointment of King Edward I. From Sir Alan, younger brother of John, the present family is descended. Callaly was granted to Robert Fitz-Roger by Gilbert de Callaly in the reign of Henry III., and has ever since continued in the possession of the house of Clavering.

Robert Fitz-Roger, Baron of Warkworth, the ancestor of this prominent Norman family, was the father of John, who took on the name "Clavering," supposedly from a lordship in Essex, by the appointment of King Edward I. The current family descends from Sir Alan, John’s younger brother. Callaly was granted to Robert Fitz-Roger by Gilbert de Callaly during the reign of Henry III, and it has remained in the possession of the Clavering family ever since.

Younger Branches. Clavering of Axwell, co. Durham, Baronet 1661, descended from James, third son of Robert Clavering of Callaly. Clavering of Berrington in North Durham, descended from William, third son of Sir John Clavering, who died a prisoner in London for his loyalty to King Charles I. Extinct about 1812.

Younger Branches. Clavering of Axwell, co. Durham, Baronet 1661, descended from James, the third son of Robert Clavering of Callaly. Clavering of Berrington in North Durham, descended from William, the third son of Sir John Clavering, who died a prisoner in London for his loyalty to King Charles I. Extinct around 1812.

See Nicolas's Siege of Carlaverock, pp. 115, 117; Mackenzie's View of Northumberland, vol. ii. p. 27; Surtees's Durham, ii. 248; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 295; and Raine's North Durham, p. 213.

See Nicolas's Siege of Carlaverock, pp. 115, 117; Mackenzie's View of Northumberland, vol. ii. p. 27; Surtees's Durham, ii. 248; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 295; and Raine's North Durham, p. 213.

Arms.—Quarterly or and gules, a bend sable, and so borne by Robert Fitz-Roger, as appears by the Roll of Carlaverock, and by his son John de Clavering, who differenced his coat by a label vert. Sir Alexander de Clavering, in the reign of Edward II., charged the bend with three mullets argent. John Clavering, in the reign of Richard II., the same arms, with a label of three points argent. (Rolls of the dates.)

Arms.—Quarterly or and red, with a black diagonal stripe, as shown by Robert Fitz-Roger in the Roll of Carlaverock, and by his son John de Clavering, who changed his coat by adding a green label. Sir Alexander de Clavering, during Edward II's reign, added three silver stars to the stripe. John Clavering, in the time of Richard II, used the same arms, with a silver label of three points. (Rolls of the dates.)

Present Representative, Edward John Clavering, Esq.

Present Representative, Edward John Clavering, Esq.





Mitford of Mitford Castle.

arms_page168.jpg

Descended from Mathew, brother of John, who is said to have held the Castle of Mitford soon after the Conquest, and by whose only daughter and heiress it went to the Bertrams. The ancestors of the present family appear to have been for many ages resident at Mitford, though the castle was not in their possession till it was granted with the manor by Charles II. to Robert Mitford, Esq.

Descended from Mathew, brother of John, who is believed to have held the Castle of Mitford soon after the Conquest, and through his only daughter and heiress, it passed to the Bertrams. The ancestors of the current family seem to have lived at Mitford for many generations, although they didn't actually own the castle until it was granted along with the manor by Charles II to Robert Mitford, Esq.

Younger Branches. Mitford of Pitshill, co. Sussex, descended from the fourth son of Robert Mitford of Mitford Castle, Esq., Sheriff of Yorkshire in 1702. Mitford of Exbury, co. Southampton, sprung from the third son of Robert Mitford, of Mitford Castle, Esq., who died in 1674. From this latter branch Mitford Baron Redesdale (1803) of Batsford, co. Gloucester, is derived.

Younger Branches. Mitford of Pitshill, Sussex, is descended from the fourth son of Robert Mitford of Mitford Castle, a gentleman who was Sheriff of Yorkshire in 1702. Mitford of Exbury, Hampshire, comes from the third son of Robert Mitford of Mitford Castle, who passed away in 1674. The Mitford Baron Redesdale (1803) of Batsford, Gloucestershire, is derived from this latter branch.

See Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 44 and for Mitford of Exbury the same work, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 152; see also Brydges's Collins, ix. 182.

See Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 44 and for Mitford of Exbury the same work, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 152; see also Brydges's Collins, ix. 182.

Arms.—Argent, a fess sable between three moles proper.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with a black band across three moles in their natural colors.

Present Representative, Robert Mitford, Esq.

Present Rep, Robert Mitford, Esq.





Swinburne of Capheaton, Baronet 1660.

arms_page169.jpg

Swinburne in this county gave name to this ancient family, the first recorded ancestor being John, father of Sir William de Swinburne, living in 1278, and Alan Swinburne, Rector of Whitfield, who purchased Capheaton from Sir Thomas Fenwick, Knt., in 1274.

Swinburne in this county gave its name to this ancient family, with the first recorded ancestor being John, the father of Sir William de Swinburne, who lived in 1278, and Alan Swinburne, Rector of Whitfield, who bought Capheaton from Sir Thomas Fenwick, Knt., in 1274.

Chollerton in Northumberland was also an ancient seat of the Swinburnes; it was held under the great Umfrevile family by this same Sir William de Swinburne, the arms being evidently founded upon the coat of the Umfreviles. The date of the baronetcy points to the loyalty of the family during the civil wars of the seventeenth century.

Chollerton in Northumberland was also an old home of the Swinburnes; it was held by Sir William de Swinburne under the prominent Umfrevile family, with the family crest clearly based on the coat of arms of the Umfreviles. The date of the baronetcy indicates the family's loyalty during the civil wars of the seventeenth century.

See the early part of the pedigree in Surtees's Durham, ii. 872; Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 231; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 167.

See the early part of the family tree in Surtees's Durham, ii. 872; Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 231; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 167.

Arms.—Per fess gules and argent, three cinquefoils counterchanged, borne by Monsieur William Swynburne in the reign of Richard II. (Roll of the date.)

Arms.—Split horizontally, with red on the top and silver on the bottom, displaying three cinquefoils in alternating colors, used by Monsieur William Swynburne during the reign of Richard II. (Roll of the date.)

Present Representative, Sir John Swinburne, 7th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Swinburne, 7th Baronet.





Middleton (called Monck) of Belsey Castle, Baronet 1662.

arms_page170.jpg

John de Middleton, father of Sir Richard Middleton, sometime secretary and chancellor to King Henry III., is the first on record of the ancestors of this family. The castle of Belsey appears to have come from the heiress of Stryvelin in the reign of Edward III. The name was exchanged for Monck in 1799. A younger branch, now extinct, was of Silksworth, co. Durham.

John de Middleton, father of Sir Richard Middleton, who was once the secretary and chancellor to King Henry III, is the first known ancestor of this family. The castle of Belsey seems to have been inherited from the heiress of Stryvelin during the reign of Edward III. The name was changed to Monck in 1799. A younger branch, which is now extinct, was based in Silksworth, County Durham.

See Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 353; "The Record of the House of Gourney," 4to, pr. pr. 1848, p. 560; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 382.

See Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 353; "The Record of the House of Gourney," 4to, pr. pr. 1848, p. 560; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 382.

Arms.—Quarterly gules and or, in the first quarter a cross flory argent.

Coat of Arms.—Divided into four sections, red and gold, featuring a silver flory cross in the top left section.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Miles Lambert Monck, sixth Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Miles Lambert Monck, sixth Baronet.





Selby of Biddleston.

arms_page171a.jpg

In 1272, King Edward I. granted in the first year of his reign the lands of Biddleston to Sir Walter de Selby: it has ever since remained in the possession of his descendants, and has been usually the chief seat of the Selbys. Their early history unfortunately is defective, occasioned by an accidental fire which took place at Allenton in 1721, at that time the residence of the family, whose evidences were thereby mostly destroyed.

In 1272, King Edward I granted the lands of Biddleston to Sir Walter de Selby in the first year of his reign: it has since stayed in the hands of his descendants and has typically been the main residence of the Selbys. Their early history is unfortunately lacking due to an accidental fire that occurred at Allenton in 1721, which was then the family's home, resulting in the destruction of most of their records.

For the grant above mentioned, and for the pedigree, see Mackenzie's View of Northumberland, ii. 39.

For the grant mentioned above and for the family tree, see Mackenzie's View of Northumberland, ii. 39.

Arms.—Barry of eight or and sable.

Arms.—Split into eight sections, gold and black.

Present Representative, Walter Selby, Esq.

Present Rep, Walter Selby, Esq.





Grey of Howick, Earl Grey 1806, Baronet 1746.

arms_page171b.jpg

An eminent border family, of which there have been many branches, descended from Thomas Grey of Heton, living in the second of Edward I. (1273), and from Sir John Grey of Berwick, living in 1372, who was ancestor of the baronial house of Grey of Wark and Chillingham, and of the Howick family, founded by Sir Edward Grey of Howick, who died in 1532, and was the fourth son of. Sir Ralph Grey of Chillingham.

An important border family with many branches descended from Thomas Grey of Heton, who lived during the reign of Edward I (1273), and from Sir John Grey of Berwick, who lived in 1372. He was the ancestor of the baronial house of Grey of Wark and Chillingham, as well as the Howick family, founded by Sir Edward Grey of Howick, who died in 1532 and was the fourth son of Sir Ralph Grey of Chillingham.

"No family perhaps in the whole of England," writes Raine in his admirable History of North Durham, "has in the course of the centuries through which the line of Grey can be traced, afforded so great a variety of character."

"No family maybe in all of England," writes Raine in his admirable History of North Durham, "has over the centuries through which the line of Grey can be traced, provided such a wide range of character."

Younger Branches. Sir George Grey, Baronet 1814, and Grey of Morwick, co. Northumberland.

Younger Branches. Sir George Grey, Baronet 1814, and Grey of Morwick, Northumberland.

See the curious and valuable "Illustrations of the Pedigree of Grey," in Raine's North Durham, p. 327, &c.; Surtees's Durham, ii. 19; and Brydges's Collins, v. 676.

See the interesting and valuable "Illustrations of the Pedigree of Grey," in Raine's North Durham, p. 327, etc.; Surtees's Durham, ii. 19; and Brydges's Collins, v. 676.

Arms.—Gules, a lion rampant within a border engrailed argent, a mullet for difference. The present coat was borne by Monsieur Thomas Grey, as appears by the Roll of the reign of Richard II.

Coat of Arms.—Red, a lion standing on one hind leg within a wavy silver border, with a star for distinction. This coat was used by Monsieur Thomas Grey, as shown by the Roll from the reign of Richard II.

Present Representative, Henry George Grey, 3rd Earl Grey, K. G.

Present Representative, Henry George Grey, 3rd Earl Grey, K. G.





Gentle.

Loraine of Kirk-Harle, Baronet 1664.

arms_page172.jpg

This is said to be a Norman family, and to have been originally settled in the county of Durham. Kirk-Harle was inherited from Johanna, daughter of William, son of Alan del Strother, in the time of Henry IV.

This family is believed to be of Norman origin and is thought to have originally settled in County Durham. Kirk-Harle was inherited from Johanna, the daughter of William, who was the son of Alan del Strother, during the time of Henry IV.

See Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 246; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 433.

See Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 246; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 433.

Arms.—Quarterly sable and argent, a plain cross counter quartered of the field. Another coat, viz. Argent, five lozenges conjoined in pale azure, in the dexter chief an escucheon of the second, is given in Courthope's Debrett's Baronetage.

Coat of Arms.—Divided into four parts, black and white, with a simple cross separating the sections. Another coat, described as White, featuring five blue diamond shapes arranged vertically, with a small shield of the same color in the top left corner, is mentioned in Courthope's Debrett's Baronetage.

Present Representative, Sir Lambton Loraine, 11th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Lambton Loraine, 11th Baronet.





Haggerston of Ellingham, Baronet 1643.

arms_page173.jpg

The pedigree is not regularly traced beyond Robert de Hagreston, Lord of Hagreston in 1399, although a Robert de Hagardeston occurs in 1312. It has been supposed that this family is of Scotch extraction; but a fire which took place at Haggerston Castle, the ancestral seat of this house, in the year 1618, and another which happened in 1687, having destroyed the ancient evidences, the early history is somewhat imperfect.

The family tree isn't regularly traced beyond Robert de Hagreston, Lord of Hagreston in 1399, although there was a Robert de Hagardeston mentioned in 1312. It's believed that this family has Scottish roots; however, a fire at Haggerston Castle, the ancestral home of this family, in 1618, followed by another fire in 1687, destroyed a lot of the early records, leaving the early history somewhat incomplete.

See Mackenzie's Northumberland, i. p. 328, note; Raine's North Durham, p. 224; and Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 388.

See Mackenzie's Northumberland, i. p. 328, note; Raine's North Durham, p. 224; and Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 388.

Arms.—Azure, on a bend cotised argent three billets sable. The ancient arms of this venerable family, of which Raine writes, "few families can boast of such a pedigree or of such a shield of arms," was a scaling ladder between two leaves, alluding to the coat of Hazlerigg, an heiress of that house having married into the Haggerston family. The arms were so borne in 1577, as appears by a seal of that date: the scaling ladder was afterwards corrupted into the bendlets and billets.

Arms.—Blue, with a silver striped band featuring three black rectangles. The traditional arms of this notable family, of which Raine writes, "few families can claim such a lineage or such a coat of arms," included a scaling ladder between two leaves, connecting to the Hazlerigg coat of arms because an heiress from that family had married into the Haggerston family. These arms were used in 1577, as demonstrated by a seal from that year: the scaling ladder was later modified into the stripes and rectangles.

Present Representative, Sir John Haggerston, 9th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Haggerston, 9th Baronet.





Ridley of Blagdon, Baronet 1756.

arms_page174.jpg

The pedigree is proved for three descents before the reign of Henry VIII., the original seat of the family being at Willimoteswick in this county, of which place Nicholas de Rydle is designated Esquire in 1481; here also was born the Martyr Bishop of London, Nicholas Ridley, early in the sixteenth century.

The family tree is verified for three generations before the reign of Henry VIII, with the original home of the family located at Willimoteswick in this county, where Nicholas de Rydle is referred to as Esquire in 1481. The Martyr Bishop of London, Nicholas Ridley, was also born here in the early sixteenth century.

The present family is a younger branch, seated at Blagdon and inheriting the baronetcy on the death of Sir Mathew White in 1763.

The current family is a younger branch, based in Blagdon and inheriting the baronet title after the death of Sir Mathew White in 1763.

See Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 322, and vol. iii. pt. ii. p. 340.

See Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 322, and vol. iii. pt. ii. p. 340.

Arms.—Gules, a chevron between three goshawks argent. The more ancient coat was, Argent, an ox passant gules through reeds proper.

Coat of Arms.—Red, with a chevron between three silver goshawks. The previous design was Silver, featuring a red ox walking through natural reeds.

Present Representative, Sir Mathew White Ridley, 4th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Mathew White Ridley, 4th Baronet.





NOTTINGHAMSHIRE.

Knightly.

Clifton of Clifton, Baronet 1611.

arms_page175.jpg

Gervase de Clifton, living in the fifth of John, is the patriarch of this honourable family, who took their name from the manor of Clifton, which was the inheritance of Sir Gervase Clifton, in the ninth of Edward II. One of the most remarkable members was the first Baronet, Sir Gervase Clifton, who died in 1666, "very prosperous and beloved of all, after having been the husband of seven wives."

Gervase de Clifton, living in the fifth year of John, is the head of this esteemed family, which got its name from the manor of Clifton. This manor was inherited by Sir Gervase Clifton in the ninth year of Edward II. One of the most notable members was the first Baronet, Sir Gervase Clifton, who died in 1666, "very prosperous and loved by all, after having been married to seven wives."

See an interesting account of him and of the family and their curious monuments in Thoroton's Antiquities of Nottinghamshire, p. 53, &c.; see also Wotton's Baronetage, i. 34.

See an interesting account of him and the family and their unusual monuments in Thoroton's Antiquities of Nottinghamshire, p. 53, &c. see also Wotton's Baronetage, i. 34.

Arms.—Sable, semee of cinquefoils, and a lion rampant argent, armed and langued gules. This coat reversed was borne by Monsieur John de Clyfton, in the reign of Richard II. (Roll of the date.)

Coat of Arms.—Black, with five-petaled flowers, and a silver lion standing on its hind legs, with red claws and tongue. This reversed coat of arms was held by Monsieur John de Clyfton during the reign of Richard II. (Roll of the date.)

Present Representative, Sir Robert Juckes Clifton, 9th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Robert Juckes Clifton, 9th Baronet.





Sutton of Norwood, Baronet 1772.

arms_page176.jpg

Sutton-upon-Trent gave name to this ancient family, the first upon record being Roland, son of Hervey, who lived in the reign of Henry III., and married Alice, daughter and coheiress of Richard de Lexington. From this match came the manor of Averham or Egram in this county, which long continued the seat and residence of the Suttons, who were represented in the days of Queen Elizabeth by Sir William Sutton, whom her Majesty coupled, not in the most complimentary manner, with three other eminent Nottinghamshire knights in the following distich:—

Sutton-upon-Trent named this ancient family, with the first recorded member being Roland, son of Hervey, who lived during the reign of Henry III. He married Alice, the daughter and coheiress of Richard de Lexington. This union resulted in the manor of Averham or Egram in this county, which remained the home and residence of the Suttons for a long time. In the days of Queen Elizabeth, they were represented by Sir William Sutton, whom her Majesty not-so-flatteringly associated with three other notable knights from Nottinghamshire in the following verse:—

"Gervase the gentle,* Stanhope the stout,
Markham the lion, and Sutton the lout."

In 1646, Robert Sutton, the head of this family, was raised to the Peerage as Baron Lexington, extinct 1723, who is represented in the female line by Viscount Canterbury. The present family descend from Henry, younger brother of the first Lord Lexington.

In 1646, Robert Sutton, the leader of this family, was elevated to the Peerage as Baron Lexington, which became extinct in 1723, and he is represented in the female line by Viscount Canterbury. The current family descends from Henry, the younger brother of the first Lord Lexington.

See Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, pp. 327, 359; and Courthope's Debrett's Baronetage, p. 195.

See Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, pp. 327, 359; and Courthope's Debrett's Baronetage, p. 195.

Arms.—Argent, a canton sable.

Arms.—Silver, a black canton.

Present Representative, Sir John Sutton, 3rd Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Sutton, 3rd Baronet.

* i.e. Sir Gervase Clifton.




Stanhope of Shelford, Earl of Chesterfield 1628.

arms_page177.jpg

Stanhope, in the wapentake of Darlington in the bishoprick of Durham, gave name to this knightly family, of whom the first recorded ancestor is Walter de Stanhope, whose son Richard died at Stanhope, in 1338 or 1339. In the reign of Edward III. we find Sir Richard Stanhope, grandson of Walter, Mayor of Newcastle-on-Tyne. Hampton and other manors in this county came by marriage with the heiress of Maulovel about 1370; but on the death of Richard Stanhope in 1529, these estates went to his only daughter and heiress, who became the wife of John Babington. The monastery of Shelford was soon after this period granted to Sir Michael Stanhope (in the 31st of Henry VIII).

Stanhope, in the wapentake of Darlington in the bishopric of Durham, is the namesake of this knightly family, with the first recorded ancestor being Walter de Stanhope. His son Richard died at Stanhope in 1338 or 1339. During the reign of Edward III, we find Sir Richard Stanhope, grandson of Walter, serving as Mayor of Newcastle-on-Tyne. Hampton and other manors in this county were acquired through marriage with the heiress of Maulovel around 1370; however, when Richard Stanhope died in 1529, these estates went to his only daughter and heiress, who married John Babington. The monastery of Shelford was granted shortly after this period to Sir Michael Stanhope (in the 31st year of Henry VIII).

Younger Branches. 1. Stanhope of Holme-Lacy, Baronet 1807, descended from the youngest brother of the great-grandfather of the present Earl. 2. Stanhope Earl Stanhope 1718, descended from the eldest son of the second marriage of the first Earl of Chesterfield. 3. Stanhope Earl of Harrington 1742, descended from Sir John Stanhope, younger brother by the half-blood of the first Earl of Chesterfield.

Younger Branches. 1. Stanhope of Holme-Lacy, Baronet 1807, comes from the youngest brother of the current Earl's great-grandfather. 2. Stanhope Earl Stanhope 1718, comes from the oldest son of the second marriage of the first Earl of Chesterfield. 3. Stanhope Earl of Harrington 1742, comes from Sir John Stanhope, the younger half-brother of the first Earl of Chesterfield.

See Lord Mahon's (now Earl Stanhope) Notices of the Stanhopes. 8vo., 1855; Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, 147; Surtees's Durham, ii. 46; and Brydges's Collins, iii. 407, iv. 171, and 284.

See Lord Mahon's (now Earl Stanhope) Notices of the Stanhopes. 8vo., 1855; Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, 147; Surtees's Durham, ii. 46; and Brydges's Collins, iii. 407, iv. 171, and 284.

Arms.—Quarterly ermine and gules. And so borne in the reign of Edward III., but after the match with Maulovel, who brought into the family the estate and seat of Rampton from the heiress of Longvillers, the arms of that family, viz. Sable, a bend between six cross-crosslets argent, were assumed; on losing that great estate, Sir Michael Stanhope resumed the more ancient coat in the reign of Henry VIII.

Coat of Arms.—Quarterly ermine and gules. These were used during the reign of Edward III, but after the marriage to Maulovel, who brought the estate and residence of Rampton into the family from the heiress of Longvillers, the family arms, which are Sable, a bend between six cross-crosslets argent, were adopted. After losing that important estate, Sir Michael Stanhope returned to the older coat during the reign of Henry VIII.

Present Representative, George Stanhope, 6th Earl of Chesterfield.

Present Representative, George Stanhope, 6th Earl of Chesterfield.





Willoughby of Wollaton, Baron Middleton 1711.

arms_page178.jpg

This is a younger and now the only remaining male branch of the great Lincolnshire family of Willoughby, descended from Sir Thomas Willoughby, Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas in the reign of Henry VIII., youngest son of Sir Christopher Willoughby of Eresby, who was sprung from Sir William Willoughby of Willoughby in Lincolnshire, and lord of that manor in the reign of Edward I. Wollaton was inherited from the heiress of Willoughby (of another family) in the thirty-eighth year of Queen Elizabeth.

This is a younger and now the only remaining male branch of the famous Willoughby family from Lincolnshire, tracing its roots back to Sir Thomas Willoughby, who was Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas during the reign of Henry VIII. He was the youngest son of Sir Christopher Willoughby of Eresby, who descended from Sir William Willoughby of Willoughby in Lincolnshire and was the lord of that manor in the reign of Edward I. Wollaton was passed down from the heiress of another Willoughby family in the thirty-eighth year of Queen Elizabeth.

See Brydges's Collins, vi. 591, vii. 215; and for the Nottinghamshire family, see Thoroton, p. 221; and for the tombs of this ancient house, pp. 36, 223, 227; see also Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed. vol. ii. p. 1052.

See Brydges's Collins, vi. 591, vii. 215; and for the Nottinghamshire family, see Thoroton, p. 221; and for the tombs of this ancient house, pp. 36, 223, 227; see also Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed. vol. ii. p. 1052.

Arms.—Or, fretty azure. And so borne by Robert de Willoughby in 1300, as appears by the Roll of Carlaverock; but after the death of Bishop Bek, his maternal uncle, in the 4th of Edward II. he adopted the coat of Bek, Gules, a mill-rind argent. See Nicolas's Roll of Carlaverock, p, 328.

Coat of Arms.—Gold with blue frets. This design was used by Robert de Willoughby in 1300, as recorded in the Roll of Carlaverock; however, after the death of his maternal uncle, Bishop Bek, in the 4th year of Edward II, he adopted the coat of Bek, Red with a silver mill-rind. See Nicolas's Roll of Carlaverock, p. 328.

Willoughby of Wollaton and of Middleton in the county of Warwick bore, Or, two bars gules, the upper charged with two waterbougets, the lower with one waterbouget, argent.

Willoughby of Wollaton and of Middleton in the county of Warwick bore, Or, two red bars, the upper one charged with two water buckets, the lower one with one water bucket, silver.

Present Representative, Henry Willoughby, 8th Baron Middleton.

Present Representative, Henry Willoughby, 8th Baron Middleton.





Clinton of Clumber, Duke of Newcastle 1756.

arms_page179.jpg

The Clintons are traced to the reign of Henry I., when, by favour of that king, Geffery de Clinton "was raised from the dust," as a contemporary writer affirms, and made Justice of England. He was enriched by large grants of land from the crown, and built the castle of Kenilworth. The present family descend from the brother of this Geffery, whose issue were of Coleshill and Maxtoke in Warwickshire, of which latter place John de Clinton was created Baron in 1298. His descendant, Edward Lord Clinton, was advanced to the Earldom of Lincoln in 1572. No family was more nobly allied, few had broader possessions—all have been long dissipated; but a fortunate match with the eventual heiress of Pelham in 1717 revived the drooping fortunes of the Clintons; hence the estate of Clumber, the former seat of the Holles family, and the Dukedom of Newcastle.

The Clintons can be traced back to the reign of Henry I, when, with the king’s favor, Geffery de Clinton "was raised from the dust," as a contemporary writer noted, and became Justice of England. He acquired extensive land grants from the crown and built Kenilworth Castle. The current family descends from the brother of Geffery, whose descendants were from Coleshill and Maxtoke in Warwickshire, where John de Clinton was made Baron in 1298. His descendant, Edward Lord Clinton, was elevated to the Earldom of Lincoln in 1572. No family was more nobly connected, and few had larger holdings—all of which have long been diminished; however, a fortunate marriage with the future heiress of Pelham in 1717 revitalized the declining fortunes of the Clintons, leading to the estate of Clumber, the former residence of the Holles family, and the Dukedom of Newcastle.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed. vol. ii. pp. 992, 1007; and Brydges's Collins, ii. 181.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed. vol. ii. pp. 992, 1007; and Brydges's Collins, ii. 181.

Arms.—Argent, three cross crosslets fitchée sable, on a chief azure two mullets pierced of the first. The original arms, as borne by Thomas de Clinton in the reign of Henry III., appears to have been a plain chief. See his seal engraved in Upton, de Studio Militari, p. 82. In the reign of Edward II. Sir John Clinton of Maxtoke bore, Argent, on a chief azure two mullets or. At the same period another Sir John Clinton bore, Or, three piles azure, a canton ermine. His son in the fifth of Edward III. bore, Argent, on a chief azure two fleurs-de-lis or. William Clinton, Earl of Huntingdon, at the same period bore the present coat with the exception of three mullets or in place of the two mullets argent, and John Clinton omitted the crosslets. William Clinton, Lord of Allesley, who lived at the same period, bore the present coat. John de Clinton in the succeeding reign, bore two mullets of six points or pierced gules, and Thomas de Clynton the same with a label of three points ermine.

Arms.—Silver, three black cross crosslets fitchée, on a blue chief two hollow stars of the same. The original coat of arms used by Thomas de Clinton during Henry III's reign seems to have been a plain chief. See his seal in Upton, de Studio Militari, p. 82. During Edward II's reign, Sir John Clinton of Maxtoke displayed Silver, on a blue chief two gold stars. Around the same time, another Sir John Clinton had Gold, three blue piles, a white canton. His son, in the fifth year of Edward III, showed Silver, on a blue chief two gold fleurs-de-lis. William Clinton, Earl of Huntington, displayed the current coat, except he had three gold stars instead of two silver stars, and John Clinton left out the crosslets. William Clinton, Lord of Allesley, who lived during the same period, bore the current coat. John de Clinton in the next reign had two six-pointed gold stars with red holes, and Thomas de Clynton had the same, along with a label of three points in ermine.

See Willement's and Nicolas's Rolls, and Montagu's Guide to the Study of Heraldry, p. 51.

See Willement's and Nicolas's Rolls, and Montagu's Guide to the Study of Heraldry, p. 51.

Present Representative, Henry Pelham Alexander Pelham-Clinton, 6th Duke of Newcastle.

Present Representative, Henry Pelham Alexander Pelham-Clinton, 6th Duke of Newcastle.





Gentle.

Eyre of Hampton.

arms_page180.jpg

The Eyres appear as witnesses to charters in the Peak of Derbyshire in the remotest period to which private charters ascend. The first of the name known is William le Eyre, of Hope, in the reign of Henry III. In the reign of Henry V. the family divided into three great branches: the present house descends from Eyre of Laughton in South Yorkshire, who spring from Eyre of Home Hall near Chesterfield. One moiety of Rampton was purchased by Anthony Eyre in the reign of Elizabeth; the other came from the coheiress of Babington, in 1624.

The Eyres are recorded as witnesses to charters in the Peak of Derbyshire from the earliest time private charters began. The first known person with this name is William le Eyre, from Hope, during the reign of Henry III. In the reign of Henry V, the family split into three major branches: the current branch comes from Eyre of Laughton in South Yorkshire, who are descendants of Eyre of Home Hall near Chesterfield. Anthony Eyre bought half of Rampton during the reign of Elizabeth, while the other half came from the coheiress of Babington in 1624.

See Hunter's South Yorkshire, i. 288; see also Lysons's Derbyshire, lxxxiii., for a note on the various branches of Eyre, and Gent. Mag. 1795, pp. 121, 212.

See Hunter's South Yorkshire, i. 288; see also Lysons's Derbyshire, lxxxiii., for a note on the different branches of Eyre, and Gent. Mag. 1795, pp. 121, 212.

Extinct Branches. 1. Eyre of Highlow, who adopted the names of Archer, Newton, and Gell. 2. Eyre of Normanton-upon-Soar. 3. Eyre Earl of Newburgh.

Extinct Branches. 1. Eyre of Highlow, who took on the names Archer, Newton, and Gell. 2. Eyre of Normanton-upon-Soar. 3. Eyre Earl of Newburgh.

Arms.—Argent, on a chevron sable three quatrefoils or.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, with a black chevron featuring three golden quatrefoils.

Present Representative, the Rev. Charles Wasteneys Eyre.

Present Representative, the Rev. Charles Wasteneys Eyre.





OXFORDSHIRE.

Knightly.

Stonor of Stonor, Baron Camoys 1383, restored 1839.

arms_page181.jpg

"Stonor is a 3 miles out of Henley. Ther is a fayre parke and a warren of connies and fayre woods. The mansion place standithe clyminge on a hille, and hathe 2 courtes buyldyd withe tymbar, brike, and flynte; Sir Walter Stonor, now possessor of it, hathe augmentyd and strengthed the howse. The Stonors hathe longe had it in possessyon syns one Fortescue invadyd it by mariage of an heire generall of the Stonors, but after dispocessed." Thus wrote Leland in his Itinerary, (vii. fo. 62a.): to which it may be added that the family has the reputation of being very ancient, and may certainly be traced to the twelfth century as resident at Stonor. In the reigns of Edward II. and III., Sir John Stonor, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, (whose tomb is preserved in the chancel of Dorchester church in this county,) was the representative and great advancer of the family.

Stonor is 3 miles outside Henley. There is a beautiful park and a warren of rabbits and lovely woods. The mansion is situated on a hill and has 2 courtyards built with timber, brick, and flint; Sir Walter Stonor, the current owner, has improved and reinforced the house. The Stonors have long owned it since a Fortescue took it over by marrying a general heir of the Stonors, but they were later dispossessed. Thus wrote Leland in his Itinerary, (vii. fo. 62a.): it can also be added that the family is known to be very ancient and can definitely be traced back to the twelfth century as residents of Stonor. During the reigns of Edward II and III, Sir John Stonor, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas (whose tomb is preserved in the chancel of Dorchester church in this county), was the representative and major benefactor of the family.

See Magna Britannia, iv. 425; and the first edition of Burke's Commoners, ii. 440; see also Excerpta Historica, p. 353, for some curious letters of the Stonors of the time of Edward IV.

See Magna Britannia, iv. 425; and the first edition of Burke's Commoners, ii. 440; see also Excerpta Historica, p. 353, for some interesting letters from the Stonors during the time of Edward IV.

Arms.—Azure, two bars dancetté or, a chief argent. Monsieur John de Stonor bore, Azure, a fess dancetté and chief or, in the reign of Edward III. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Blue, featuring two wavy gold bars and a silver chief. Monsieur John de Stonor had Blue, with a wavy gold band and chief, during the reign of Edward III. (Roll.)

Present Representative, Thomas Stonor, 3rd Baron Camoys.

Present Representative, Thomas Stonor, 3rd Baron Camoys.





Wykeham of Tythrop.

arms_page182.jpg

This ancient family is traced to the commencement of the fourteenth century, when Robert Wykeham was Lord of Swalcliffe, the original seat of the Wykehams in this county, and possessed by the late W. H. Wykeham, Esq., who died in 1800, and still, I believe, belonging to his daughter the Baroness Wenman. Tythrop came from the Herberts by will to the late P. P. Wykeham, Esq. uncle of Lady Wenman.

This ancient family can be traced back to the early fourteenth century when Robert Wykeham was the Lord of Swalcliffe, the original home of the Wykehams in this county. It was later owned by the late W. H. Wykeham, Esq., who passed away in 1800, and I believe it is still owned by his daughter, the Baroness Wenman. Tythrop was inherited from the Herberts through a will to the late P. P. Wykeham, Esq., who was the uncle of Lady Wenman.

The relationship of the great William of Wykeham, Bishop of Winchester, with this family is a disputed point, for which see Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica, ii. 225, 368, iii. 178, 245; see also the Topographer and Genealogist, iii. 49, for a very interesting paper on this subject by C. Wykeham Martin, Esq., M.P.

The connection between the esteemed William of Wykeham, Bishop of Winchester, and this family is a matter of debate; for details, refer to Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica, ii. 225, 368, iii. 178, 245; also check the Topographer and Genealogist, iii. 49, for an interesting article on this topic by C. Wykeham Martin, Esq., M.P.

Younger Branch. Wykeham Martin, of Leeds Castle, Kent.

Younger Branch. Wykeham Martin, from Leeds Castle, Kent.

Arms.—Allowed by Robert Cooke, Clarencieux, in 1571.—Argent, two chevronels sable between three roses gules, barbed and seeded proper. This coat was borne by the great Bishop, though when he was Archdeacon of Lincoln he bore but one chevron between the roses. But the herald Glover attributed a variation of the arms of Chamberlaine, derived from the Counts of Tankerville, to Wykeham of Swalcliffe, viz: Ermine, on a bordure gules six mullets or.

Coat of Arms.—Granted by Robert Cooke, Clarencieux, in 1571.—Silver, two black chevronels between three red roses, with natural barbs and seeds. This coat was used by the great Bishop, although when he was Archdeacon of Lincoln, he only had one chevron between the roses. However, the herald Glover assigned a variation of the arms of Chamberlaine, which came from the Counts of Tankerville, to Wykeham of Swalcliffe, specifically: Ermine, with a red border featuring six gold stars.

Present Representative, Philip Thomas Herbert Wykeham, Esq.

Present Representative, Philip Thomas Herbert Wykeham, Esq.





Croke of Studley, anciently Blount.

arms_page183.jpg

This is the eldest branch of the great family of Blount or le Blond, whose origin has been traced by the late Sir Alexander Croke to the Counts of Guisnes before the Norman Conquest. Robert le Blount, whose name is found recorded in Domesday, was a considerable landholder in Suffolk, Ixworth in that county being the seat of his Barony. Belton in Rutlandshire was afterwards inherited by his descendants from the Odinsels, and Hampton-Lovet, in the county of Worcester, from the Lovet family. In 1404, Nicholas le Blount, who had been deeply engaged in the conspiracy to restore Richard II. to his throne, changed his name to Croke, on his return to England, in order to avoid the revenge of Henry IV. The Crokes afterwards became a legal family, and seated themselves at Chilton in Buckinghamshire. The priory of Studley was purchased from Henry VIII. by John Croke, in 1539.

This is the oldest branch of the prominent Blount or le Blond family, which the late Sir Alexander Croke traced back to the Counts of Guisnes before the Norman Conquest. Robert le Blount, whose name appears in the Domesday Book, was a significant landowner in Suffolk, with Ixworth being the center of his Barony. His descendants later acquired Belton in Rutlandshire from the Odinsels and Hampton-Lovet in Worcester from the Lovet family. In 1404, Nicholas le Blount, who was heavily involved in the conspiracy to restore Richard II to the throne, changed his name to Croke upon returning to England to evade the wrath of Henry IV. The Crokes eventually became a prominent legal family and settled in Chilton, Buckinghamshire. John Croke purchased the priory of Studley from Henry VIII in 1539.

Younger Branches. Blount of Sodington, in the county of Worcester, and of Mawley Hall in Shropshire, descended from William, second son of Sir Robert le Blount, who died in 1288, and the heiress of Odinsels. The Blounts of Maple-Durham in this county, and the extinct Lords Mountjoy, are of a still junior line to the house of Sodington. The other extinct branches are too numerous to mention.

Younger Branches. Blount of Sodington, in Worcester county, and of Mawley Hall in Shropshire, are descendants of William, the second son of Sir Robert le Blount, who passed away in 1288, and the heiress of Odinsels. The Blounts of Maple-Durham in this county, as well as the extinct Lords Mountjoy, come from an even younger line than the house of Sodington. The other extinct branches are too many to list.

See Croke's Genealogy of the Croke Family, 4to. 1823, and "The Scrope and Grosvenor Roll," vol. ii. p. 192, for a memoir of Sir Walter Blount, who fell at the battle of Shrewsbury together with Sir Hugh Shirley and two other knights in the royal coat-armour of Henry the Fourth—

See Croke's Genealogy of the Croke Family, 4to. 1823, and "The Scrope and Grosvenor Roll," vol. ii. p. 192, for a biography of Sir Walter Blount, who died at the battle of Shrewsbury alongside Sir Hugh Shirley and two other knights in the royal coat-of-arms of Henry the Fourth—

"semblably furnished like the King himself."

Arms.—For Blount. Barry nebulée of six or and sable. For Croke, Gules, a fess between six martlets argent. The more ancient coat was, Lozengy or and sable, which was borne by William le Blount in the reign of Henry III. Sir William le Blount of Warwickshire, (so called because he held under the Earl of Warwick,) bore the present nebulée coat in the reign of Edward II. Sir Thomas le Blount at the same period the fess between three martlets, now called the coat of Croke. (Rolls of the dates.)

Coats of Arms. — For Blount: Barry spotted in six pieces of gold and black. For Croke: Red with a band featuring six white martlets. The older coat was gold and black in a diamond pattern, which was used by William le Blount during the reign of Henry III. Sir William le Blount of Warwickshire (named because he held land under the Earl of Warwick) displayed the current spotted coat during the reign of Edward II. At the same time, Sir Thomas le Blount used a band with three martlets, now known as the coat of Croke. (Rolls from those dates.)

Present Representative, George Croke, Esq.

Present Rep, George Croke, Esq.





Ashurst of Waterstock.

arms_page184.jpg

A Lancashire family of good antiquity, and until the middle of the last century lords of Ashurst in that county, where they appear to have been seated not long after the Conquest. In the reign of James II. the eldest son of a younger brother was created a Baronet, of Waterstock in this county. His daughter and eventual heiress married Sir Richard Allin, Baronet, whose daughter, marrying Mr. Ashurst of Ashurst, great-grandfather of the present representative of the family, brought the estate of Waterstock into the elder line of the Ashursts.

A Lancashire family with a long history, who were lords of Ashurst in that county until the middle of the last century, seem to have been established there not long after the Conquest. During the reign of James II, the eldest son of a younger brother was made a Baronet of Waterstock in this county. His daughter and eventual heiress married Sir Richard Allin, Baronet, and their daughter married Mr. Ashurst of Ashurst, who was the great-grandfather of the current representative of the family. This marriage brought the estate of Waterstock into the main line of the Ashursts.

See Burke's Extinct and Dormant Baronetage, and his Landed Gentry.

See Burke's Extinct and Dormant Baronetage, and his Landed Gentry.

Arms.—Gules, a cross between four fleurs-de-lis argent. The Baronet family bore the cross engrailed or, and but one fleur-de-lis of the same.

Arms.—Red, with a cross consisting of four silver fleurs-de-lis. The Baronet family had the engrailed gold cross, featuring only one fleur-de-lis of the same color.

Present Representative, John Henry Ashurst, Esq.

Present Representative, John Henry Ashurst, Esq.





Annesley of Bletchingdon, Viscount Valentia in Ireland 1621.

arms_page185.jpg

Ralph, surnamed Brito de Annesley, living in the second year of Henry II. (1156,) is assumed to have been son of Richard, of Annesley, in the county of Nottingham, mentioned in the Domesday Survey. That estate continued in the Annesleys till the death of John de Annesley, Esq., in 1437, when it went by an heiress to the Chaworths. The family then removed to Rodington in the same county, and afterwards to Newport-Pagnell in Buckinghamshire; but Ireland was the scene of the prosperity of the family, early in the seventeenth century, which may be said to have been re-founded by Sir Francis Annesley, Secretary of State in 1616. Hence the Viscountcy of Valentia, which afterwards merged in the Earldom of Anglesey in England, adjudged by the English House of Lords to be extinct in 1761; but by the same evidence the Viscountcy of Valentia was allowed to the grandson of the last Earl of Anglesey, whom the English House of Lords found to be illegitimate. He was created Earl of Mountnorris in Ireland in 1793, and on the decease of the last Earl in 1844, the Irish Viscountcy and the representation of the family descended to Arthur Annesley of Bletchingdon, Esq., descended from the second marriage of the first Viscount Valentia.

Ralph, known as Brito de Annesley, lived during the second year of Henry II. (1156) and is believed to be the son of Richard from Annesley in Nottinghamshire, who is mentioned in the Domesday Survey. That estate remained with the Annesley family until the death of John de Annesley, Esq., in 1437, when it passed to the Chaworth family through an heiress. The family then moved to Rodington in the same county and later to Newport Pagnell in Buckinghamshire; however, their fortunes increased in Ireland in the early seventeenth century, largely thanks to Sir Francis Annesley, who became Secretary of State in 1616. This led to the Viscountcy of Valentia, which later merged into the Earldom of Anglesey in England, considered extinct by the English House of Lords in 1761. However, the same review granted the Viscountcy of Valentia to the grandson of the last Earl of Anglesey, who the English House of Lords determined to be illegitimate. He was made Earl of Mountnorris in Ireland in 1793, and upon the death of the last Earl in 1844, the Irish Viscountcy and the family representation passed to Arthur Annesley of Bletchingdon, Esq., who was a descendant of the second marriage of the first Viscount Valentia.

Younger Branches. 1. Annesley of Clifford Chambers, co. Gloucester. 2. The Earl of Annesley in Ireland, 1789.

Younger Branches. 1. Annesley of Clifford Chambers, Gloucestershire. 2. The Earl of Annesley in Ireland, 1789.

See Baker's Northamptonshire, i. 502; Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, p. 251; Archdall's Lodge, iv. 99; and the Tyndale Genealogy, privately printed, folio, 1843.

See Baker's Northamptonshire, vol. 1, p. 502; Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, p. 251; Archdall's Lodge, vol. 4, p. 99; and the Tyndale Genealogy, privately printed, folio, 1843.

Arms.—Paly of six argent and azure, a bend gules. Monsieur de Annesley bore, Paly of six argent and gules, a bend vairy argent and sable, in the reign of Edward III. The present coat was borne by John de Annesley in the reign of Richard II. (Rolls.)

Coat of Arms.—Split vertically into six sections of silver and blue, featuring a red diagonal stripe. Monsieur de Annesley had split vertically into six sections of silver and red, with a diagonal pattern of alternating silver and black during Edward III's reign. The current coat was held by John de Annesley during Richard II's reign. (Rolls.)

Present Representative, Arthur Annesley, 11th Viscount Valentia.

Present Representative, Arthur Annesley, 11th Viscount Valentia.





Villiers of Middleton-Stoney, Earl of Jersey 1697.

arms_page186.jpg

The family of Villers or Villiers is ancient in Leicestershire, Alexander de Villiers being lord of Brokesby in that county early in the thirteenth century. The present coat of arms is said to have been assumed in the reign of Edward I., as a badge of Sir Richard de Villers' services in the crusades. "Villiers of Brokesby" occurs among the gentlemen of Leicestershire, "that be there most of reputation," in the Itinerary of Leland the antiquary in the reign of Henry VIII. But the great rise of the family was in the reign of James I., when the favourite Sir George Villiers became Duke of Buckingham in 1623, extinct 1687. The Earls of Jersey are sprung from the second but elder brother of the first duke. Their connection with Oxfordshire appears not to have been before the middle of the last century. Brokesby was sold by Sir William Villiers, who died s. p. 1711.

The Villers or Villiers family is old in Leicestershire, with Alexander de Villiers being the lord of Brokesby in that county early in the 13th century. The current coat of arms is believed to have been adopted during the reign of Edward I as a symbol of Sir Richard de Villers' contributions in the crusades. "Villiers of Brokesby" is mentioned among the most respected gentlemen of Leicestershire in the Itinerary of Leland the antiquary during the reign of Henry VIII. However, the family really rose to prominence during the reign of James I, when the favorite Sir George Villiers became the Duke of Buckingham in 1623, a title that became extinct in 1687. The Earls of Jersey are descendants of the second but older brother of the first duke. Their link to Oxfordshire seems to have begun in the mid-18th century. Brokesby was sold by Sir William Villiers, who died without heirs in 1711.

Younger Branch. The Earl of Clarendon (1776), descended from the second son of the second Earl of Jersey.

Younger Branch. The Earl of Clarendon (1776), descended from the second son of the second Earl of Jersey.

Extinct branch. The Earl of Grandison in Ireland, 1721; extinct 1766; descended from the elder brother of Sir Edward Villiers, who died 1689, ancestor of the Earl of Jersey.

Extinct branch. The Earl of Grandison in Ireland, 1721; extinct 1766; descended from the older brother of Sir Edward Villiers, who died in 1689, ancestor of the Earl of Jersey.

See Leland's Itinerary, i. fol. 23, and vi. fol. 65; Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. pt. i. p. 197; and Brydges's Collins, iii. 762.

See Leland's Itinerary, i. fol. 23, and vi. fol. 65; Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. pt. i. p. 197; and Brydges's Collins, iii. 762.

Arms.—Argent, on a cross gules five escallops or. The ancient arms founded on those of the Bellemonts Earls of Leicester were Sable, three cinquefoils argent.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, featuring a red cross with five golden scallop shells. The original coat of arms, inspired by the Bellemonts, Earls of Leicester, was Black, with three silver cinquefoils.

Present Representative, Victor Albert George Villiers, 7th Earl of Jersey.

Present Representative, Victor Albert George Villiers, 7th Earl of Jersey.





Gentle.

Coker of Bicester.

arms_page188.jpg

The younger, but I believe now the only remaining, line of a family formerly seated at Coker in the county of Somerset, where it can be traced to the time of Edward I. Mapouder in Dorsetshire, derived from the heiress of Veale in the reign of Henry V., became afterwards the family seat. In 1554, John Coker, who appears to have been second son of Thomas Coker, of Mapouder, purchased the Manor of "Nuns' Place or King's End in Biscester," which has since remained the residence of this ancient family.

The younger line of a family that used to be based at Coker in Somerset, which can be traced back to the time of Edward I. Mapouder in Dorsetshire, came from the heiress of Veale during the reign of Henry V., and later became the family seat. In 1554, John Coker, who seems to have been the second son of Thomas Coker of Mapouder, bought the Manor of "Nuns' Place or King's End in Biscester," which has since been the home of this old family.

See Coker's Survey of Dorsetshire, p. 98; Hutchins's History of Dorsetshire, vol. iii. p. 273; Kennett's Parochial Antiquities, 1st. ed. p. 109; and Burke's Commoners, 2nd ed. vol. iii. p. 347.

See Coker's Survey of Dorsetshire, p. 98; Hutchins's History of Dorsetshire, vol. iii. p. 273; Kennett's Parochial Antiquities, 1st ed. p. 109; and Burke's Commoners, 2nd ed. vol. iii. p. 347.

Arms.—Argent, on a bend gules three leopard's heads or. The Mapouder line bore the arms within a border engrailed sable; but the elder branch of the family, who are represented by the Seymours Dukes of Somerset, omitted the border.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a red diagonal stripe featuring three golden leopard heads. The Mapouder line included the arms with a notched black border; however, the older branch of the family, represented by the Seymours Dukes of Somerset, omitted the border.

Present Representative, Lewis Coker, Esq.

Present Rep, Lewis Coker, Esq.





Parker of Shirburn Castle, Earl of Macclesfield 1721, Baron Parker 1716.

arms_page189.jpg

By the decease of the late Thomas Hawe Parker, Esq., of Park Hall, in the county of Stafford, the representation of the family has devolved upon the Earl of Macclesfield, who represents the junior line. The Parkers were established at Park Hall, in the parish of Caverswall, in the seventeenth century, having been previously seated at Parwich, and before that at Norton-Lees, in the county of Derby. The first recorded ancestor, Thomas Parker, was of Bulwell, in Nottinghamshire, in the reign of Richard II. He married the heiress of Gotham, and from hence, says Lysons, the seat of Norton-Lees.

With the passing of the late Thomas Hawe Parker, Esq., of Park Hall in Staffordshire, the family representation has passed to the Earl of Macclesfield, who comes from the junior branch. The Parkers established themselves at Park Hall in the Caverswall parish in the seventeenth century, having previously lived in Parwich, and before that in Norton-Lees, in Derbyshire. The first documented ancestor, Thomas Parker, was from Bulwell in Nottinghamshire during the reign of Richard II. He married the heir of Gotham, which, according to Lysons, became the site of Norton-Lees.

See Lysons's Derbyshire, p. cxxxviii.; Brydges's Collins, iv, 190; and Ward's Stoke-upon-Trent, p. 561.

See Lysons's Derbyshire, p. cxxxviii.; Brydges's Collins, iv, 190; and Ward's Stoke-upon-Trent, p. 561.

Arms.—Gules, a chevron between three leopard's heads or.

Coat of Arms.—Red background with a chevron and three golden leopard heads.

Present Representative, Thomas Augustus Wolstenholme Parker, 6th Earl of Macclesfield.

Present Representative, Thomas Augustus Wolstenholme Parker, 6th Earl of Macclesfield.





RUTLANDSHIRE.

Knightly.

Wingfield of Tickencote.

arms_page190.jpg

The Wingfields of Wingfield and Letheringham, both in Suffolk, a distinguished family of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, are traced nearly to the Conquest, though they do not appear to have been lords of the manor or castle of Wingfield before the reign of Edward II. The elder branch of this family is represented by the Viscount Powerscourt in Ireland, descended from Lewis the ninth son of Sir John Wingfield of Letheringham. The present family is sprung from Henry, a younger brother of this Sir John, who died in 1481. Tickencote was acquired by marriage in the reign of Elizabeth with the heiress of Gresham.

The Wingfields of Wingfield and Letheringham, both in Suffolk, were a notable family during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, with roots dating back to the Conquest. However, they don’t seem to have held the title of lords of the manor or castle of Wingfield until the reign of Edward II. The main branch of this family is represented by the Viscount Powerscourt in Ireland, who is a descendant of Lewis, the ninth son of Sir John Wingfield of Letheringham. The current family comes from Henry, a younger brother of this Sir John, who died in 1481. Tickencote was obtained through marriage during the reign of Elizabeth with the heiress of Gresham.

Younger Branch. Wingfield of Onslow in Shropshire, according to the Visitation of that county, descended from Anthony Wingfield of Glossop, co. Derby, younger son of Sir Robert Wingfield of Letheringham, who died in 1431.

Younger Branch. Wingfield of Onslow in Shropshire, according to the Visitation of that county, is descended from Anthony Wingfield of Glossop, co. Derby, who was the younger son of Sir Robert Wingfield of Letheringham, who died in 1431.

See the elaborate dissertation on the House of Wingfield in the second volume of Anstis's Register of the Order of the Garter; see also Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, pp. 147, 150; Camden's Visitation of the county of Huntingdon, 1613, (printed by the Camden Society,) p. 125, &c.; and Blore's Rutlandshire, (fo. 1811,) for full pedigrees of the different branches formerly seated at Crowfield and Dunham-Magna, co. Norfolk; Kimbolton Castle, co. Huntingdon; Letheringham and Brantham, co. Suffolk; and Upton, co. Northampton, p. 65-70. For Viscount Powerscourt, see Archdall's Lodge, v. 255.

See the detailed discussion on the House of Wingfield in the second volume of Anstis's Register of the Order of the Garter; see also Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, pp. 147, 150; Camden's Visitation of the county of Huntingdon, 1613, (printed by the Camden Society,) p. 125, &c.; and Blore's Rutlandshire, (fo. 1811,) for complete family trees of the different branches that were once based at Crowfield and Dunham-Magna, co. Norfolk; Kimbolton Castle, co. Huntingdon; Letheringham and Brantham, co. Suffolk; and Upton, co. Northampton, pp. 65-70. For Viscount Powerscourt, see Archdall's Lodge, v. 255.

Arms.—Argent, on a bend gules cotised sable three pair of wings conjoined of the field. In the reign of Richard II. Monsieur William Wyngefeld bore, Gules, two wings conjoined in lure argent. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a red diagonal stripe outlined in black, featuring three pairs of wings connected in silver. During the time of Richard II, Mr. William Wyngefeld displayed the arms Red, with two wings connected in silver. (Roll.)

Present Representative, John Muxloe Wingfield, Esq.

Present Representative, John Muxloe Wingfield, Esq.





SHROPSHIRE.

Knightly.

Corbet of Moreton-Corbet, Baronet 1808.

arms_page192.jpg

Pre-eminent among the ancient aristocracy of Shropshire is the House of Corbet, descended from "Roger, son of Corbet," so called in the Domesday Survey. In the twelfth century the Corbets divided into two branches; the elder was seated at Wattlesborough, the younger at Caus-Castle. In the time of Henry III. the former became of Moreton-Corbet, derived from the heiress of the Anglo-Saxon family of Toret; but the Caus-Castle line was by far the most eminent, and became barons of the realm. In the reign of Richard II. several of the most ancient of the Corbet estates were lost by an heiress; and this happened again in 1583, when the lands brought into the family by the heiress of Hopton went by marriage to the Wallops and Careys. Moreton-Corbet remained till 1688, when it also descended to the sister of Sir Vincent Corbet; but the male line was still preserved by the Corbets of Shrewsbury, and the ancient estate of Moreton-Corbet re-purchased about 1743.

Leading among the ancient aristocracy of Shropshire is the House of Corbet, which traces its lineage back to "Roger, son of Corbet," as mentioned in the Domesday Survey. In the twelfth century, the Corbets split into two branches; the elder settled in Wattlesborough, and the younger in Caus-Castle. During Henry III's reign, the former branch became known as Moreton-Corbet, named after the heiress of the Anglo-Saxon family of Toret; however, the Caus-Castle line was significantly more prominent and eventually became barons of the realm. During Richard II's reign, several of the oldest Corbet estates were lost when an heiress inherited them, and this occurred again in 1583 when the lands brought into the family by the heiress of Hopton were married away to the Wallops and Careys. Moreton-Corbet remained in the family's possession until 1688, when it passed to the sister of Sir Vincent Corbet; nevertheless, the male line continued through the Corbets of Shrewsbury, and the historic estate of Moreton-Corbet was repurchased around 1743.

Younger Branch. Corbett of Elsham (co. Lincoln) and of Darnhall (co. Chester,) descended from Robert second son of Sir Vincent Corbet, of Moreton-Corbet, who died in 1622.

Younger Branch. Corbett of Elsham (Lincolnshire) and of Darnhall (Cheshire) is descended from Robert, the second son of Sir Vincent Corbet of Moreton-Corbet, who passed away in 1622.

Extinct Branches. 1. Corbet of Stoke and Adderley in this county, Baronet 1627, sprung from Reginald third son of Sir Robert Corbet of Moreton-Corbet; extinct 1780. 2. Corbet of Hadley in this county, descended from the second marriage of Sir Roger Corbet of Wattlesborough, who died temp. King John. The heiress married John Greville, in the 7th Henry V. 3. Corbet of Longnor in this county, and of Leighton, co. Montgomery, Baronet 1642, descended also from John third son of Peter Corbet, Baron of Caus, and Alice Orreby; extinct 1814. 4. Corbet of Sundorne, formerley of Leigh in this county, descended from John third son of Peter Corbet, Baron of Caus, and of Alice his wife, daughter of Sir Fulke de Orreby; extinct 1859.

Extinct Branches. 1. Corbet of Stoke and Adderley in this county, Baronet 1627, descended from Reginald, the third son of Sir Robert Corbet of Moreton-Corbet; extinct 1780. 2. Corbet of Hadley in this county, descended from the second marriage of Sir Roger Corbet of Wattlesborough, who died during the reign of King John. The heiress married John Greville in the 7th year of Henry V. 3. Corbet of Longnor in this county, and of Leighton, in Montgomery, Baronet 1642, also descended from John, the third son of Peter Corbet, Baron of Caus, and Alice Orreby; extinct 1814. 4. Corbet of Sundorne, formerly of Leigh in this county, descended from John, the third son of Peter Corbet, Baron of Caus, and his wife Alice, daughter of Sir Fulke de Orreby; extinct 1859.

See Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, fol. Shrewsbury, 1831, pp. 37, 63, 65, 230, &c., corrected by the MSS. of the late Mr. Joseph Morris of Shrewsbury;* see also Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. vii. p. 5; and Gent. Mag. for 1809, pp. 599, 903.

See Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, fol. Shrewsbury, 1831, pp. 37, 63, 65, 230, etc., updated by the manuscripts of the late Mr. Joseph Morris of Shrewsbury;* see also Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. vii. p. 5; and Gent. Mag. for 1809, pp. 599, 903.

Arms.—Or, a raven proper. The present coat, "Or, un corbyn de sable," was borne by Sir Peter Corbet in the reign of Edward II.; but Thomas Corbet, in that of Henry III., bore "Or, 2 corbeaux sable," which, with the addition of a bordure engrailed sable, is the coat of the Corbets of Sundorne. Or, three ravens in pale proper, was borne by Corbet of Hadley, and was so borne by Sir Thomas Corbet in the reign of Edward II. (Rolls.)

Coat of Arms.—Gold, a raven proper. The current coat, "Gold, a black raven," was used by Sir Peter Corbet during the reign of Edward II. However, Thomas Corbet, during Henry III's reign, carried "Gold, 2 black ravens," which, along with a black engrailed border, is the coat of the Corbets of Sundorne. Gold, three ravens in pale proper, was used by Corbet of Hadley and was carried by Sir Thomas Corbet in the reign of Edward II. (Rolls.)

Present Representative, Sir Vincent Rowland Corbet, 3rd Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Vincent Rowland Corbet, 3rd Baronet.

* In future quoted as "Morris MSS."




Leighton of Loton, Baronet 1692-3.

arms_page194.jpg

The Leightons are stated to have been seated at Leighton in this county prior to the Conquest: Domesday has "Rainald (vicecom') ten' Lestone; Leuui tenuit temp. Reg. Edw." Hence there can be no doubt the name Lestone, i.e. Lewi's-town, now Leighton, was derived. Certain it is that the direct ancestors of the family of Leighton were resident there at the very commencement of the twelfth century. From Rainald the sheriff, who was the superior lord of Leighton when Domesday was compiled, that and all his other manors passed in marriage with his daughter to Alan, the ancestor of the Fitz-Alan family; and in the Liber Niger, under the year 1167, Richard son of Tiel (Tihel) is stated to hold Leighton under William Fitz-Alan by the service of one knight. This Richard was the undoubted ancestor of this ancient family. Leighton is now severed from the inheritance of the male line of the Leightons, belonging to Robert Gardner, Esq., whose wife was the heiress of the Kinnersleys, descended in the female line from the second marriage of Sir Thomas Leighton, knighted in 1513. Church Stretton, acquired by the heiress of Cambray in the fifteenth century, was for four generations the family seat. Loton (an ancient Corbet estate) was acquired by marriage with a coheiress of Burgh, by John Leighton, Sheriff of Shropshire in 1468.

The Leightons are said to have been established in Leighton in this county before the Conquest. Domesday mentions "Rainald (vicecom') ten' Lestone; Leuui tenuit temp. Reg. Edw." So, there's no doubt that the name Lestone, meaning Lewi's-town, which is now Leighton, originated from there. It's clear that the direct ancestors of the Leighton family lived there at the very beginning of the twelfth century. Rainald the sheriff, who was the lord of Leighton when Domesday was created, and all his other manors went to Alan, the ancestor of the Fitz-Alan family, through marriage with his daughter. In the Liber Niger, under the year 1167, it's noted that Richard, son of Tiel (Tihel), held Leighton under William Fitz-Alan, performing the service of one knight. Richard is definitely the ancestor of this ancient family. Leighton is now separate from the inheritance of the male line of the Leightons and belongs to Robert Gardner, Esq., whose wife is the heiress of the Kinnersleys, descended through the female line from Sir Thomas Leighton's second marriage, who was knighted in 1513. Church Stretton, obtained by the heiress of Cambray in the fifteenth century, served as the family seat for four generations. Loton, an old Corbet estate, was acquired by John Leighton, Sheriff of Shropshire in 1468, through marriage with a coheiress of Burgh.

See Eyton's Shropshire, vii. p. 325; Wotton's Baronetage, iv. 38; Blakeway, pp. 74, 75, 80, 91; Stemmata Botvilliana, 1858; and Morris MSS.

See Eyton's Shropshire, vii. p. 325; Wotton's Baronetage, iv. 38; Blakeway, pp. 74, 75, 80, 91; Stemmata Botvilliana, 1858; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Quarterly per fess indented or and gules. In 1315, Sir Richard de Leighton bore the present coat differenced by a bendlet, as appears by his seal attached to a deed still preserved at Loton: the same arms are on his monument, formerly in Buildwas Abbey, and now in Leighton church.

Coat of Arms.—Divided into four sections horizontally, gold and red. In 1315, Sir Richard de Leighton showcased this coat with a small diagonal stripe, as evidenced by his seal on a deed still held at Loton: the same arms are featured on his monument, which was originally in Buildwas Abbey and is now in Leighton church.

Present Representative, Sir Baldwin Leighton, 7th Baronet, late M.P. for South Salop.

Present Representative, Sir Baldwin Leighton, 7th Baronet, former M.P. for South Salop.





Sandford of Sandford.

arms_page195.jpg

A family of acknowledged antiquity, whose ancestor Richard de Sanford was certainly seated at Sandford soon after the Conquest, and which has ever since remained their principal seat; it is in the parish of Prees, and is mentioned by Leland in his Itinerary. The Herald of the eighteenth century, and the late excellent Bishop of Edinburgh, were both of this family.

A family of recognized heritage, whose ancestor Richard de Sanford was definitely established at Sandford shortly after the Conquest, and which has since remained their main residence; it is located in the parish of Prees and is referenced by Leland in his Itinerary. The herald from the eighteenth century and the recently esteemed Bishop of Edinburgh were both part of this family.

Younger Branch. Sandford of the Isle House near Shrewsbury, parted from the parent stem in the fifteenth century, and who also by marriage represent the ancient Shropshire families of Sprenghose and Winsbury.

Younger Branch. Sandford of the Isle House near Shrewsbury broke away from the main family in the fifteenth century and also represents the historic Shropshire families of Sprenghose and Winsbury through marriage.

See Eyton's Shropshire, ix. p. 221; and Blakeway, pp. 54, 190, 222.

See Eyton's Shropshire, ix. p. 221; and Blakeway, pp. 54, 190, 222.

Arms.—Quarterly per fess indented azure and ermine. The Sandfords of the Isle bear, Party per chevron sable and ermine, in chief two boar's heads couped close or.

Coat of Arms.—Divided into four sections, the top half is blue, and the bottom half is white with black spots. The Sandfords from the Isle have, divided in a chevron shape with a black top and a white bottom, featuring two gold boar heads severed at the neck on top.

Present Representative, Thomas Hugh Sandford, Esq.

Present Representative, Thomas Hugh Sandford, Esq.





Kynaston of Hardwicke, Baronet 1818.

arms_page196.jpg

The Kynastons are lineal descendants of the ancient British Princes of Powys, sprung from Griffith, son of Iorwerth Goch, who took refuge in this county; where, as it is stated in the Testa de Nevill, King Henry II. gave him the manors of Rowton and Ellardine, in the parish of High Ercall, and Sutton and Brocton in the parish of Sutton, to be held in capite by the service of being latimer (i.e. interpreter) between the English and Welsh. He married Matilda, younger sister and coheir of Ralph le Strange, and in her right became possessed of the manor of Kinnerley and other estates in Shropshire. Madoc, the eldest son of Griffith, seated himself at Sutton, from him called to this day "Sutton Madoc;" Griffith Vychan, the younger son, had Kinnerley, a portion of his mother's inheritance, and in that manor he resided at Tre-gynvarth, Anglicè Kynvarth's Town, usually written and spoken as Kynaston; and hence the name of the family. Griffith or Griffin de Kyneveston, son of Griffith Vychan, was witness to a grant of land to the abbey of Haghmond in 1313. His lineal descendant Roger Kynaston fought at Blore Heathe in 1459, and Lord Audley the Lancastrian General is supposed to have fallen by his hand; hence the second quarter in the arms, and for this and other services he received the honour of knighthood. The Kynastons, from the place so called, went to Hordley, and latterly in the seventeenth century removed to Hardwicke.

The Kynastons are direct descendants of the ancient British Princes of Powys, descended from Griffith, the son of Iorwerth Goch, who sought refuge in this county. According to the Testa de Nevill, King Henry II granted him the manors of Rowton and Ellardine in the parish of High Ercall, and Sutton and Brocton in the parish of Sutton, to hold in chief by serving as a latimer (i.e. interpreter) between the English and Welsh. He married Matilda, the younger sister and co-heir of Ralph le Strange, and through her, he acquired the manor of Kinnerley and other estates in Shropshire. Madoc, Griffith's eldest son, settled in Sutton, which is still called "Sutton Madoc" today. Griffith Vychan, the younger son, inherited Kinnerley, part of his mother’s inheritance, and lived at Tre-gynvarth, or Kynvarth's Town in English, which is commonly written and said as Kynaston; this is how the family got their name. Griffith or Griffin de Kyneveston, son of Griffith Vychan, was a witness to a land grant to the abbey of Haghmond in 1313. His direct descendant Roger Kynaston fought at Blore Heathe in 1459, and it’s believed that Lord Audley, the Lancastrian General, fell by his hand; this is reflected in the second quarter of the family's coat of arms, and for this and other services, he received the honor of knighthood. The Kynastons, from the place so named, moved to Hordley, and later in the seventeenth century, they relocated to Hardwicke.

The Kynastons of Oteley, extinct early in the eighteenth century, were an elder branch; they acquired Oteley by the marriage of an heiress of that ancient house in the reign of Henry VII., and were descended from John, elder brother of Sir Roger Kynaston before mentioned.

The Kynastons of Oteley, who became extinct early in the eighteenth century, were an older branch. They acquired Oteley through the marriage of an heiress from that ancient family during the reign of Henry VII, and they were descended from John, the older brother of Sir Roger Kynaston mentioned earlier.

See Blakeway, p. 73; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, p. 73; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Quarterly, 1 and 4, Argent, a lion rampant sable; 2 and 3, Ermine, a chevron gules. Sir John de Kynastone in the reign of Edward II. bore, Sable, a lion rampant queve forchée or. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Divided into four parts, 1 and 4: Silver background with a black lion standing on one leg; 2 and 3: Ermine background with a red chevron. Sir John de Kynastone, during the reign of Edward II, displayed: Black background with a lion standing on one hind leg with a forked tail in gold. (Roll.)

Present Representative, Sir John Roger Kynaston, 3rd Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Roger Kynaston, 3rd Baronet.





Cornewall of Delbury.

arms_page197.jpg

This is the only remaining branch of the once powerful family of Cornewall, for so many ages Barons of Burford, (though without a summons to parliament,) descended from Richard, natural son of Richard Earl of Cornwall, King of the Romans, and second son of John King of England: (an illegitimacy however which was denied at the Heralds' Visitation of this county in 1623, by Sir Thomas Cornewall, of Burford, who stated that the said Richard was the legitimate son of Richard Plantagenet, Earl of Cornwall, by Sanchia of Provence, his second wife). The Barony of Burford came into the Cornewall family before he ninth of Edward II. with the coheiress of Mortimer, and continued with the descendants till the death of Francis, Baron of Burford, in 1726. The present family is sprung from a younger line, seated at Berrington in the county of Hereford, in the fifteenth century, and which estate was sold in the eighteenth. Delbury was purchased by and became the seat of Frederick Cornewall, Esq. who died in 1788, and was father of the late Bishop of Worcester.

This is the only surviving branch of the once powerful Cornewall family, who were Barons of Burford for many generations (although they didn’t have a seat in parliament). They are descended from Richard, the illegitimate son of Richard, Earl of Cornwall, who was King of the Romans and the second son of John, King of England. This illegitimacy was disputed at the Heralds' Visitation of this county in 1623 by Sir Thomas Cornewall of Burford, who claimed that Richard was actually the legitimate son of Richard Plantagenet, Earl of Cornwall, and Sanchia of Provence, his second wife. The Barony of Burford came into the Cornewall family before the ninth of Edward II, through the co-heiress of Mortimer, and remained with their descendants until the death of Francis, Baron of Burford, in 1726. The current family descends from a younger branch that was based at Berrington in Herefordshire in the fifteenth century, although that estate was sold in the eighteenth century. Delbury was purchased by Frederick Cornewall, Esq., who died in 1788 and was the father of the late Bishop of Worcester.

See Blakeway, pp. 72, 83, 92; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, pages 72, 83, 92; and Morris manuscripts.

Arms.—Ermine, a lion rampant gules crowned or within a bordure engrailed sable bezantee. "Jeffery de Cornewall" and "Symon de Cornewall" bore, Argent, a lion rampant gules crowned or, with a baston sable, the first charged with three mullets or, the second with three bezants. (Roll of the reign of Edward III.) The present coat was borne by Monsieur Bryan Cornewall, in the reign of Richard II. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Ermine, a red lion rearing on its hind legs, crowned in gold, surrounded by a black wavy border dotted with gold. "Jeffery de Cornewall" and "Symon de Cornewall" displayed, Silver, a red lion rearing on its hind legs, crowned in gold, with a black staff, the first having three gold stars, the second with three gold circles. (Roll from the reign of Edward III.) The current coat was used by Monsieur Bryan Cornewall during the reign of Richard II. (Roll.)

Present Representative, Herbert Cornewall, Esq.

Rep. Herbert Cornewall, Esq.





Lingen (called Burton) of Longnor.

arms_page198.jpg

The first recorded ancestor of this loyal family is Ralph de Wigmore, lord of Lingen, in the county of Hereford, founder of the Priory of Lyngbroke. His son and grandson John took the name of Lingen: the latter is recorded in the Testa de Nevill as holding various estates in Herefordshire, "of the old feoffment," that is, by descent from the time of King Henry I. His lineal descendant, Sir John Lingen, of Lingen and Sutton, in the county of Hereford, having married in the reign of Edward IV. the daughter and coheiress of Sir John Burgh, succeeded to considerable estates in Shropshire, and to the manor of Radbrook, in the county of Gloucester, until recently the inheritance of his descendants. Longnor, the ancient seat of the Burtons, came into the family in 1722, by the marriage of Thomas Lingen, Esq. of Radbrook, with Anne, only daughter of Robert Burton, Esq. and sister and heir of Thomas Burton, of Longnor, Esq. Their son assumed the name of Burton by Act of Parliament in 1748.

The first recorded ancestor of this loyal family is Ralph de Wigmore, lord of Lingen in Herefordshire, who founded the Priory of Lyngbroke. His son and grandson, both named John, adopted the name Lingen; the latter is documented in the Testa de Nevill as owning several estates in Herefordshire, "of the old feoffment," meaning he inherited them from the time of King Henry I. His direct descendant, Sir John Lingen, from Lingen and Sutton in Herefordshire, married during the reign of Edward IV to the daughter and co-heir of Sir John Burgh, gaining substantial estates in Shropshire and the manor of Radbrook in Gloucestershire, which remained with his descendants until recently. Longnor, the historic seat of the Burtons, came into the family in 1722 through the marriage of Thomas Lingen, Esq. of Radbrook, and Anne, the only daughter of Robert Burton, Esq., and sister and heir of Thomas Burton of Longnor, Esq. Their son changed his name to Burton by Act of Parliament in 1748.

From Morris MSS.

From Morris Manuscripts.

Arms.—Barry of six or and azure, on a bend gules three roses argent.

Coat of Arms.—Divided horizontally into six parts of gold and blue, with a red diagonal stripe that has three silver roses.

Present Representative, Robert Burton, Esq.

Present Representative, Robert Burton, Esq.





Harley of Down-Rossal.

arms_page199.jpg

The origin of this knightly family has been recently explored by Mr. Eyton in his Antiquities of Shropshire, and from that valuable authority it appears that Edward and Hernulf, living in the first half of the twelfth century, were lords of Harley, and the ancestors of the race who were afterwards denominated therefrom. Sixth in descent from William de Harley living in 1231 was Sir Robert de Harley, who having married the coheiress of Brampton Bryan, in the county of Hereford, that place became the residence of his descendants, sprung from Sir Bryan his second son. The Shropshire estates went to the elder son, and passed through heiresses first to the Peshalls, and thence to the Lacons. Fifth in descent from Sir Bryan de Harley was John Harley, Esq. who signalised himself at Flodden Field in 1513. His eldest son was ancestor of the Earls of Oxford (1711,) extinct 1853. The present family, who now represent this ancient lineage, are descended from William third son of the above mentioned John. He died in 1600, having seated himself at Beckjay, in this county. The family afterwards became citizens of Shrewsbury, and acquired Down-Rossal, the present seat, in 1852.

The history of this knightly family has recently been examined by Mr. Eyton in his *Antiquities of Shropshire*, and according to this valuable source, Edward and Hernulf, who lived in the first half of the twelfth century, were lords of Harley and the ancestors of the family that later took their name from it. The sixth in descent from William de Harley, who lived in 1231, was Sir Robert de Harley. He married the coheiress of Brampton Bryan in Herefordshire, making that place the home of his descendants, who came from Sir Bryan, his second son. The Shropshire estates went to the elder son and were passed through heiresses first to the Peshalls and then to the Lacons. Fifth in descent from Sir Bryan de Harley was John Harley, Esq., who distinguished himself at Flodden Field in 1513. His eldest son was the ancestor of the Earls of Oxford (1711), who became extinct in 1853. The current family, representing this ancient lineage, descends from William, the third son of the aforementioned John. He died in 1600 after settling at Beckjay in this county. The family later became citizens of Shrewsbury and acquired Down-Rossal, their current residence, in 1852.

See Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. vi. p. 230; Collins's Noble Families, p. 184; Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 37; and Morris MSS.

See Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. vi. p. 230; Collins's Noble Families, p. 184; Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 37; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Or, a bend cotised sable, and which was borne by Sir Richard de Harlee in the reign of Edward II. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms. — Gold with a black diagonal stripe bordered by a narrow black line, which was used by Sir Richard de Harlee during the reign of Edward II. (Roll.)

Present Representative, John Harley, Esq.

Present Rep, John Harley, Esq.





Tyrwhitt, of Stanley-Hall, Baronet 1808.

arms_page201.jpg

This is a younger branch of an ancient Lincolnshire family, according to Wotton, to be traced to Sir Hercules Tyrwhitt, living in the tenth of Henry I., and raised to eminence by Sir Robert Tyrwhitt, Justice of the Common Pleas and King's Bench in the reign of Henry IV. He was seated at Kettleby, in that county, which remained the residence of the elder branch, created Baronets in 1611, until its extinction in 1673. A younger son was of Scotter, in the same county, the ancestor of the present family, of whom John, fifth son of the Rev. Robert Tyrwhitt, married a descendant of the Jones's of Shrewsbury, and by her acquired the Stanley-Hall estate, and took the name of Jones, but the present Baronet has since resumed the ancient name of Tyrwhitt.

This is a younger branch of an old Lincolnshire family. According to Wotton, it can be traced back to Sir Hercules Tyrwhitt, who lived during the reign of Henry I, and gained prominence through Sir Robert Tyrwhitt, who served as Justice of the Common Pleas and King's Bench during the reign of Henry IV. He was based at Kettleby in that county, which remained the home of the elder branch, made Baronet in 1611, until it faded out in 1673. A younger son settled in Scotter, also in the same county, and became the ancestor of the current family. John, the fifth son of Rev. Robert Tyrwhitt, married a descendant of the Jones's of Shrewsbury, which allowed him to acquire the Stanley-Hall estate and adopt the surname Jones, but the current Baronet has since taken back the ancient name of Tyrwhitt.

See Blakeway, p. 240; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 178; Camden's Remains, p. 151; Baker's Northamptonshire, i. 115 and "Notices and Remains of the Family of Tyrwhitt," &c. "printed not published." 8vo. n.d. [By R. P. Tyrwhitt, Esq. of the Middle Temple, eldest son of Richard Tyrwhitt, late of Nantyr Hall in Denbighshire, Esq. younger brother of the first Baronet.]

See Blakeway, p. 240; Wotton's Baronetage, i. 178; Camden's Remains, p. 151; Baker's Northamptonshire, i. 115 and "Notices and Remains of the Family of Tyrwhitt," etc. "printed not published." 8vo. n.d. [By R. P. Tyrwhitt, Esq. of the Middle Temple, the eldest son of Richard Tyrwhitt, late of Nantyr Hall in Denbighshire, Esq. younger brother of the first Baronet.]

Arms.—Gules, three tyrwhitts or.

Arms.—Red, three tyrwhitts gold.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Thomas Tyrwhitt, third Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Thomas Tyrwhitt, third Baronet.





Gentle.

Gatacre of Gatacre.

arms_page202.jpg

A family of great antiquity, and which is said to have been established at Gatacre by a grant from Edward the Confessor. The pedigree, however, is not traced beyond the reign of Henry III.

A family with a long history, believed to have been established at Gatacre through a grant from Edward the Confessor. However, the family lineage cannot be traced back beyond the reign of Henry III.

Although very ancient, this family does not appear to have been distinguished except by "The fair maid of Gatacre," (see Blakeway, p. 169,) and by the eminent divine of this house noticed in "Fuller's Worthies," and who was the ancestor of the Gatacres of Mildenhall, in Suffolk.

Although very old, this family doesn’t seem to have been notable except for "The fair maid of Gatacre," (see Blakeway, p. 169,) and by the famous clergyman from this family mentioned in "Fuller's Worthies," who was the ancestor of the Gatacres of Mildenhall, in Suffolk.

See Leland's Itinerary, v. p. 31; Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. iii. p. 86; and Morris MSS.

See Leland's Itinerary, v. p. 31; Eyton's Antiquities of Shropshire, vol. iii. p. 86; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Quarterly gules and ermine, on the second and third quarters three piles of the first, on a fess azure five bezants. This coat, a remarkable exception to the simple heraldry of the period, is supposed to have been granted to Humphry Gatacre, Esquire of the Body to King Henry VI. The following coat, ascribed to this family, was about the end of the seventeenth century in the church of Claverley in this county: Quarterly, first and fourth ermine, a chief indented gules; second and third gules, over all on a fess azure three bezants. (Eyton's Shropshire, iii. p. 103.)

Coat of ArmsDivided into four parts, red and white; in the second and third parts, there are three triangular shapes in red, and on a blue band, there are five round gold coins. This coat of arms, a significant departure from the simple heraldry of the time, is thought to have been granted to Humphry Gatacre, Esquire of the Body to King Henry VI. The following coat of arms, associated with this family, was discovered in the late seventeenth century in the church of Claverley in this county: Divided into four parts, the first and fourth parts are white with a jagged red top; the second and third parts are red, and across all, on a blue band, there are three gold coins. (Eyton's Shropshire, iii. p. 103.)

Present Representative, Edward Lloyd Gatacre, Esq.

Present Representative, Edward Lloyd Gatacre, Esq.





Eyton of Eyton.

arms_page203.jpg

This family can also lay claim to great antiquity, being certainly resident at Eyton on the Wealdmoors as early as the reigns of Henry I. and II. They were in some way connected with the Pantulfs, Barons of Wem, who were Lords of Eyton at the period of the Domesday Survey, and, in consequence of this connection, not only quarter their arms, but were among the very few Shropshire gentry who were not dispossessed after the Rebellion of the third Norman Earl of Shrewsbury, in the time of Henry I.

This family can also claim a long history, having lived at Eyton on the Wealdmoors as early as the reigns of Henry I and II. They were somehow linked to the Pantulfs, Barons of Wem, who were Lords of Eyton at the time of the Domesday Survey. Because of this connection, they not only share their coat of arms but were also among the few Shropshire gentry who weren't dispossessed after the rebellion of the third Norman Earl of Shrewsbury during Henry I's reign.

Robert de Eyton stands at the head of the pedigree.

Robert de Eyton is at the top of the family tree.

See Blakeway, pp. 56, 70, 71; Eyton's Shropshire, viii. p. 26; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, pp. 56, 70, 71; Eyton's Shropshire, viii. p. 26; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Quarterly, first and fourth, or, a fret azure; second and third, gules two bars ermine.

Arms.—Split into four parts, the first and fourth parts have a blue cross; the second and third parts show two white stripes on a red background.

Present Representative, Thomas Campbell Eyton, Esq.

Present Representative, Thomas Campbell Eyton, Esq.





Plowden of Plowden.

arms_page204a.jpg

When the ancestors of this family were first seated at Plowden is a matter of doubt, but it was at a very early period. In 1194 Roger de Plowden is said to have been at the siege of Acre with Richard I., and there to have acquired the fleurs-de-lis in the arms. The name occurs upon all the county records from the reign of Henry III. Edmund Plowden the lawyer, in the sixteenth century, was the great luminary of this family.

When the ancestors of this family first settled in Plowden is unclear, but it happened quite early on. In 1194, Roger de Plowden is said to have participated in the siege of Acre with Richard I and gained the fleurs-de-lis in his coat of arms there. The name appears in all county records starting from the reign of Henry III. Edmund Plowden, the lawyer, was the leading figure of this family in the sixteenth century.

See Baker's Northamptonshire, i. 470; Blakeway, pp. 132, 222, and Morris MSS.

See Baker's Northamptonshire, i. 470; Blakeway, pp. 132, 222, and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Azure, a fess dancettée, the two upper points terminating in fleurs-de-lis or.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, featuring a zigzag band, with the two upper ends ending in golden fleurs-de-lis.

Present Representative, William Henry Francis Plowden, Esq.

Present Representative, William Henry Francis Plowden, Esq.





Acton of Aldenham, Baronet 1643-4.

arms_page204b.jpg

Engelard de Acton, of Acton-Pigot and Acton-Burnell, was admitted on the Roll of Guild Merchants of Shrewsbury in 1209. His descendant Edward de Acton, of Aldenham, married the coheiress of Le'Strange, living in 1387, and with her acquired an estate in Longnor, in this county. The baronetcy was the reward of loyalty in the beginning of the great rebellion.

Engelard de Acton, from Acton-Pigot and Acton-Burnell, was registered in the Guild Merchants of Shrewsbury in 1209. His descendant Edward de Acton, from Aldenham, married the coheiress of Le'Strange, who was alive in 1387, and together they gained an estate in Longnor, in this county. The baronetcy was a reward for loyalty at the start of the great rebellion.

General Acton, Prime Minister to the King of Naples for twenty-nine years, commencing in 1778, was a distinguished member of this family.

General Acton, who served as Prime Minister to the King of Naples for twenty-nine years starting in 1778, was an esteemed member of this family.

See Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 398; Blakeway, pp. 54, 174.

See Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 398; Blakeway, pp. 54, 174.

Arms.—Gules, crusilly or, two lions passant in pale argent. This coat is evidently founded on that of Le'Strange.

Coat of Arms.—Red background with golden crosses and two silver lions walking side by side. This coat of arms clearly derives from that of Le'Strange.

Present Representative, Sir John Emerick Edward Dalberg Acton, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Emerick Edward Dalberg Acton, 8th Baronet.





Whitmore of Apley.

arms_page205.jpg

This is a younger branch of an ancient family formerly seated at Whittimere or Whitmore, in the parish of Claverley, where it is traced to the reign of Henry III. The Apley branch made a large fortune by mercantile transactions in London in the reign of Elizabeth, and purchased that estate in 1572, from Sir Thomas Lucy, Knight. The Whitmores have represented Bridgnorth in Parliament constantly since the reign of Charles II. Blakeway observes that this family does not appear to have had any connection with the Whitmores of Cheshire, though the Heralds have given them similar arms, with a crest allusive to the springing of a young shoot out of an old stock.

This is a younger branch of an ancient family that used to be based in Whittimere or Whitmore, in the parish of Claverley, where its roots can be traced back to the reign of Henry III. The Apley branch earned a significant fortune through trading in London during Elizabeth’s reign and bought that estate in 1572 from Sir Thomas Lucy, Knight. The Whitmores have represented Bridgnorth in Parliament continuously since the reign of Charles II. Blakeway points out that this family doesn’t seem to have any connection with the Whitmores of Cheshire, even though the Heralds have given them similar coats of arms, featuring a crest symbolizing a young shoot emerging from an old stock.

Younger Branches. Whitmore of Dudmaston, in this county, and Whitmore-Jones, of Chastleton, in the county of Oxford.

Younger Branches. Whitmore of Dudmaston, in this county, and Whitmore-Jones, of Chastleton, in the county of Oxford.

See Blakeway, p. 106, and Notes on the Whitmore Family, in Notes and Queries, 3rd series, v. p. 159.

See Blakeway, p. 106, and Notes on the Whitmore Family, in Notes and Queries, 3rd series, v. p. 159.

Arms.—Vert, fretty or.

Arms.—Green, fretty gold.

Present Representative, Thomas Charlton Whitmore, Esq.

Present Representative, Thomas Charlton Whitmore, Esq.





Walcot of Bitterley.

arms_page206.jpg

The name is derived from Walcot in the parish of Lydbury, which was held under the Bishop of Hereford by Roger de Walcot in 1255. He was the ancestor of the present family. Sixth in descent from Roger de Walcot was John Walcot, of whom the pedigree relates, "that playing at Chess with King Henry V. he gave him the check-mate with the rooke, whereupon the King changed his coat of arms, which was the cross with fleurs-de-lis, and gave him the rooke for a remembrance." Walcot was sold in the year 1764, and Bitterley, which had belonged to the family in 1660, became the seat of the Walcots, descended from Humphry Walcot, who died in 1616, and who was the eldest son of John Walcot of Walcot. He had livery of the manor of Walcot in 1611, "on the extinction (says Blakeway,) I suppose of the elder line."

The name comes from Walcot in the parish of Lydbury, which was held under the Bishop of Hereford by Roger de Walcot in 1255. He was the ancestor of the current family. John Walcot, who was the sixth generation from Roger de Walcot, is mentioned in the family history for having checkmated King Henry V while playing chess, which led the King to change his coat of arms from the cross with fleurs-de-lis and gave him the rook as a keepsake. Walcot was sold in 1764, and Bitterley, which the family had owned since 1660, became the home of the Walcot family, descended from Humphry Walcot, who died in 1616 and was the eldest son of John Walcot of Walcot. He received the livery of the manor of Walcot in 1611, "on the extinction (says Blakeway,) I suppose of the elder line."

See Blakeway, p. 112; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, p. 112; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three chess-rooks ermine. The former coat, Argent, on a cross patonce azure five fleurs-de-lis or, was ascribed to John de Walcote in the Roll of the reign of Richard II.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a chevron between three white chess rooks. The previous coat, Silver, with a cross having rounded ends in blue and five gold fleurs-de-lis, was linked to John de Walcote in the Roll dating from the reign of Richard II.

Present Representative, the Rev. Charles Walcot.

Present Representative, the Rev. Charles Walcot.





Baldwin (called Childe) of Kinlet.

arms_page207.jpg

This ancient family, which has been supposed to be of Norman origin, was early seated at Diddlebury, (or Delbury,) in Corvedale, which appears to have come from the heiress of Wigley. Roger Baldwin of Diddlebury died anno 1398, and was the ancestor of the family. Diddlebury was sold to the Cornewalls of Berrington in the last century, when the Baldwins removed to Aqualate in Staffordshire. Kinlet was the inheritance of the Childes, whose coheiress married Charles Baldwin, Esq. The Childes derived it from the Lacons, and the Lacons by inheritance from the Blounts of Kinlet.

This old family, thought to be of Norman descent, settled in Diddlebury (or Delbury) in Corvedale early on, which seems to have come from the heiress of Wigley. Roger Baldwin of Diddlebury died in 1398 and was the ancestor of the family. Diddlebury was sold to the Cornewalls of Berrington last century, at which point the Baldwins moved to Aqualate in Staffordshire. Kinlet was inherited by the Childes, whose coheiress married Charles Baldwin, Esq. The Childes got it from the Lacons, and the Lacons inherited it from the Blounts of Kinlet.

See Blakeway, p. 212.

See Blakeway, p. 212.

Arms.—Argent, a saltire sable.

Arms.—Silver, a black saltire.

Present Representative, Walter Lacon Childe, Esq.

Present Representative, Walter Lacon Childe, Esq.





Dod of Cloverly.

arms_page208.jpg

A branch of the Dods of Edge in Cheshire, now extinct in the male line, and one of the oldest families in England, which can be traced in a direct line, undoubtedly of Saxon, if not of British descent, which, says Blakeway, "is in the highest degree probable." The following is Ormerod's account of the origin of this family. "About the time of Henry II., Hova, son of Cadwgan Dot, married the daughter and heiress of the Lord of Edge, with whom he had the fourth of that manor. It is probable that the Lord of Edge was son of Edwin, who before the Conquest was sole proprietor of eight manors; we may call him a Saxon thane. It appears by Domesday that Dot was the Saxon lord of sixteen manors, from all of which he was ejected; we may presume he was identical with Cadwgan Dot." "A descent in the male line (adds Ormerod) from a Saxon noticed in Domesday would be unique in this county" (Cheshire). The Dods of Cloverley descend from Hugo, living in the fourteenth of Henry IV., who married the coheiress of Roger de Cloverley. He was the son of John Dod of Farndon, who was son of Roger Dod of Edge, living in the reign of Edward III., which John Dod had also acquired property in Shropshire, by marriage with the coheiress of Warden of Ightfield.

A branch of the Dods of Edge in Cheshire, which has now died out in the male line, is one of the oldest families in England, tracing its lineage directly back, likely of Saxon, if not British, descent—a fact that Blakeway considers "extremely probable." Here’s Ormerod's account of the family’s origins: "Around the time of Henry II, Hova, son of Cadwgan Dot, married the daughter and heiress of the Lord of Edge, and from this union, he received a quarter of that manor. It’s likely that the Lord of Edge was the son of Edwin, who was the sole owner of eight manors before the Conquest; we could refer to him as a Saxon thane. According to Domesday, Dot was the Saxon lord of sixteen manors, from which he was dispossessed; we can assume he was the same as Cadwgan Dot." "A direct male descent from a Saxon mentioned in Domesday would be unique in this county" (Cheshire), adds Ormerod. The Dods of Cloverley are descended from Hugo, who lived during the reign of Henry IV, and married the coheiress of Roger de Cloverley. He was the son of John Dod of Farndon, who was the son of Roger Dod of Edge, who lived during the reign of Edward III. This John Dod also acquired property in Shropshire by marrying the coheiress of Warden of Ightfield.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, ii. 374; and Blakeway, p. 206.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, vol. 2, p. 374; and Blakeway, p. 206.

Arms.—Argent, a fess gules between two cotises wavy sable. The Dods of Edge bore three crescents or, on the fess, by which one would imagine they were the younger rather than the elder line of the family, and the present owner of Cloverly possesses deeds which appear to prove that this was the fact.

Arms.—Silver, with a red stripe between two wavy black bands. The Dods of Edge showcased three gold crescents on the stripe, indicating they were the younger branch of the family instead of the older one, and the current owner of Cloverly has documents that appear to confirm this.

Present Representative, John Whitehall Dod, Esq. late M.P. for North Shropshire.

Present Representative, John Whitehall Dod, Esq., former Member of Parliament for North Shropshire.





Oakeley of Oakeley.

arms_page209.jpg

An ancient family, descended from Philip, who in the reign of Henry III. was lord of Oakeley in the parish of Bishop's Castle, from whence he assumed his name, and which has ever since been the inheritance of his descendants.

An old family, descended from Philip, who during the reign of Henry III was the lord of Oakeley in the parish of Bishop's Castle, from which he took his name, and which has since been inherited by his descendants.

Younger Branch. Sir Charles Oakeley, Baronet 1790.

Younger Branch. Sir Charles Oakeley, Baronet 1790.

See Blakeway, pp. 132, 173; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, pp. 132, 173; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Argent, on a fess between three crescents gules as many fleurs-de-lis or. These arms are, with those of the Plowdens and other families of the vicinity, allusive to the services of ancestors who fought under the banners of the great suzeraines of their district, the Fitz-Alans, in the Crusades and the battlefields of France.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a stripe between three red crescents and three golden fleurs-de-lis. These arms, along with those of the Plowdens and other local families, honor the ancestors who fought under the banners of the notable leaders of their area, the Fitz-Alans, during the Crusades and in battles in France.

Present Representative, the Rev. Arthur Oakeley.

Present Representative, the Rev. Arthur Oakeley.





Hill of Hawkstone, Viscount Hill 1842, Baronet 1726-7.

arms_page210.jpg

The first in the pedigree is Hugh de la Hulle, who held the estate of Hulle, that is, Court of Hill, in the parish of Burford, in this county, as the eleventh part of a knight's fee, of the Barony of Stuteville, in the reigns of Richard I. and John, as appears by the Testa de Neville. The family afterwards removed into the north of the county, by marriages with the coheiresses of Wlenkeslow, Buntingsdale, Styche, and Warren. The castle still borne in the coat of Hill is found on the seal of William Hill in the reign of Richard II. Court of Hill, the original seat of the Hills, was bequeathed in the reign of Queen Elizabeth to the second son of the eldest branch of the family, in whose line it continued till carried by an heiress to the family of the present proprietor. Hawkstone, the present seat, was settled upon Humphry Hill in 1560. The great ornament of this family, and indeed he may be called the founder of its modern consequence, was Richard Hill, Envoy Extraordinary to the Italian States in the very beginning of the eighteenth century.

The first in the lineage is Hugh de la Hulle, who owned the estate of Hulle, or Court of Hill, in the Burford parish of this county, as the eleventh part of a knight's fee, belonging to the Barony of Stuteville, during the reigns of Richard I and John, as shown by the Testa de Neville. The family later moved to the northern part of the county through marriages with the coheiresses of Wlenkeslow, Buntingsdale, Styche, and Warren. The castle still represented in the coat of arms for Hill appears on the seal of William Hill during the reign of Richard II. Court of Hill, the original home of the Hills, was passed down during the reign of Queen Elizabeth to the second son of the eldest branch of the family, where it remained until it was inherited by an heiress into the family of the current owner. Hawkstone, the present residence, was settled on Humphry Hill in 1560. The significant figure of this family, and he may be regarded as the founder of its modern importance, was Richard Hill, Envoy Extraordinary to the Italian States at the very beginning of the eighteenth century.

See Blakeway, pp. 142, 179; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, pp. 142, 179; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Ermine, on a fess sable a castle argent.

Coat of Arms.—White fur, featuring a silver castle on a black band.

Present Representative, Rowland Hill, second Viscount Hill.

Present Representative, Rowland Hill, 2nd Viscount Hill.





Forester of Willey, Baron Forester 1821.

arms_page211.jpg

This family is clearly descended from "Robert de Wolint," (Wellington,) alias Forester, who is named in the Testa de Neville as holding his estate by the serjeantry of keeping the royal hay of Wellington in the forest of the Wrekin; and there is every probability that he was the descendant of Ulger the Forester, chief forester of all the king's forests in Shropshire in the time of Stephen.

This family clearly descends from "Robert de Wolint" (Wellington), also known as Forester, who is mentioned in the Testa de Neville as holding his estate by the serjeantry of maintaining the royal hay of Wellington in the Wrekin forest; and it's very likely that he was a descendant of Ulger the Forester, the chief forester of all the king's forests in Shropshire during the reign of Stephen.

See Blakeway, p. 126; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, p. 126; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Quarterly per fess dancettée argent and sable, on the first and fourth quarters a bugle horn of the last, garnished or.

Coat of Arms.—It's divided into four parts, with the top and bottom sections in silver and black in a zigzag pattern, and in the first and fourth sections, there's a black bugle horn trimmed in gold.

Present Representative, John George Weld Forester, 2nd Baron Forester.

Present Representative, John George Weld Forester, 2nd Baron Forester.





Edwardes, of Harnage Grange and Shrewsbury, Baronet 1645.

arms_page212.jpg

Iddon, son of Rys Sais, a powerful British chieftain in the Shropshire Marches at the period of the Norman Conquest, is the ancestor of the family of Edwardes. His descendants were seated at Kilhendre, in the parish of Ellesmere, in the reign of Henry I., an estate which continued in the family in the time of Queen Elizabeth. The eminent services of Sir Thomas Edwardes of Shrewsbury to King Charles I. were rewarded by the grant of a Baronetcy in 1645. The patent, however, was not taken out till the year 1678, with a right of precedency before all baronets created after 1644. The distinguished Major Herbert Edwardes, C.B., one of Her Majesty's Commissioners for settling the affairs of the Punjaub, is of this family.

Iddon, the son of Rys Sais, a powerful British chieftain in the Shropshire Marches during the Norman Conquest, is the ancestor of the Edwardes family. His descendants settled at Kilhendre in the parish of Ellesmere during the reign of Henry I, and the estate remained in the family by the time of Queen Elizabeth. Sir Thomas Edwardes of Shrewsbury earned a Baronetcy in 1645 for his notable services to King Charles I. However, the official patent wasn’t issued until 1678, granting him precedence over all baronets created after 1644. The notable Major Herbert Edwardes, C.B., one of Her Majesty's Commissioners for managing the affairs of the Punjab, is also a part of this family.

See Blakeway, pp. 107, 121; Blakeway and Owen's Shrewsbury, ii. 259; and Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 415; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, pp. 107, 121; Blakeway and Owen's Shrewsbury, ii. 259; and Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 415; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Gules, a chevron engrailed between three heraldic tiger's heads erased argent.

Arms.—Red background with a chevron featuring notched edges between three silver heraldic tiger heads.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Hope Edwardes, 10th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Hope Edwardes, 10th Baronet.





Betton (called Bright) of Totterton Hall.

arms_page213.jpg

Walter De Betton had a freehold estate at Betton-Strange, near Shrewsbury, in the reign of Edward I. William Betton, fourth in descent from Walter, was seated at Great Berwick prior to the reign of Henry IV., and at his house the renowned Hotspur lay during the night preceding the Battle of Shrewsbury.

Walter De Betton owned land at Betton-Strange, near Shrewsbury, during the reign of Edward I. William Betton, who was the fourth generation from Walter, lived at Great Berwick before the reign of Henry IV, and it was at his home that the famous Hotspur spent the night before the Battle of Shrewsbury.

The estate and mansion of Great Berwick continued with their lineal descendants until sold in 1831, by Richard Betton, Esq. whose uncle having succeeded to the estates of John Bright, Esq. assumed that name, and was father of the present proprietor of Totterton Hall.

The estate and mansion of Great Berwick remained in their direct family line until they were sold in 1831 by Richard Betton, Esq. His uncle, who inherited the estates from John Bright, Esq., took on that name and was the father of the current owner of Totterton Hall.

From the Morris MSS.

From the Morris manuscripts.

Arms.—Argent, two pales sable, each charged with three cross-crosslets fitchée or.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with two black vertical stripes, each featuring three gold cross-crosslets arranged diagonally.

Present Representative, the Rev. John Bright.

Present Representative, the Rev. John Bright.





Clive (called Herbert) of Styche, Earl of Powis 1804; Baron Clive in the peerage of Ireland 1762.

arms_page214.jpg

Although this family owe their elevation to the military genius of the great Lord Clive, to whom the English nation is so much indebted for its glory and power in the East, yet the Clives have undoubted claims to antiquity both in Shropshire and Cheshire, in which latter county, in the hundred of Northwich, is Clive, from whence their ancestor Warin assumed his name in the time of Henry III. About the reign of Edward II. the family removed to Huxley, also in Cheshire, Henry de Clive having married the coheiress; and again in the reign of Henry VI. on the marriage of James Clive with the heiress of Styche, of Styche, they settled in Shropshire at that place, which is in the parish of Moreton-Say, and has remained uninterruptedly in the Clive family. The Earldom of Powis is the result of the match with the heiress of Herbert, of Powis Castle, in 1784.

Although this family owes their rise to the military brilliance of the great Lord Clive, to whom the English nation is greatly indebted for its glory and power in the East, the Clives also have undeniable claims to history in both Shropshire and Cheshire. In the latter county, in the hundred of Northwich, lies Clive, from where their ancestor Warin took his name during the reign of Henry III. Around the time of Edward II, the family moved to Huxley, also in Cheshire, after Henry de Clive married the coheiress. Later, during the reign of Henry VI, James Clive married the heiress of Styche, leading them to settle in Shropshire at that location, which is in the parish of Moreton-Say, and has remained continuously in the Clive family. The Earldom of Powis was established as a result of the marriage to the heiress of Herbert, of Powis Castle, in 1784.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, ii. 435, iii. 115; Blakeway, p. 140; Brydges's Collins, v. 543; and Morris MSS.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, ii. 435, iii. 115; Blakeway, p. 140; Brydges's Collins, v. 543; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Argent, on a fess sable three mullets or. In the fourth year of Edward VI., three wolf's heads erased sable were added to the field of the original coat. See Archdall's Lodge, vii. 80.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a black band featuring three gold stars. In the fourth year of Edward VI, three black wolf's heads were added to the original coat of arms. See Archdall's Lodge, vii. 80.

Present Representative, Edward James Herbert, 3rd Earl of Powis.

Present Representative, Edward James Herbert, 3rd Earl of Powis.





Lawley of Spoonbill, Baron Wenlock 1839; Baronet 1641.

arms_page215a.jpg

This family is descended from Thomas Lawley, cousin and next heir to John Lord Wenlock, K.G. in the reign of Edward IV., who was slain at the battle of Tewkesbury. The Lawleys were described as "of Wenlock" in the reign of' Henry VI., and until that of Henry VIII., when Richard Lawley, Esq. ancestor of Lord Wenlock, was written "of Spoonhill."

This family descends from Thomas Lawley, cousin and next in line to John Lord Wenlock, K.G. during the reign of Edward IV, who was killed at the battle of Tewkesbury. The Lawleys were referred to as "of Wenlock" during the reign of Henry VI, and continued to be until the reign of Henry VIII, when Richard Lawley, Esq., the ancestor of Lord Wenlock, was listed as "of Spoonhill."

See Blakeway, p. 92; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 261; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, p. 92; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 261; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Argent, a cross formée, checky or and sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, featuring a cross formée, patterned in gold and black.

Present Representative, Beilby Richard Lawley-Thompson, 2nd Baron Wenlock.

Present Representative, Beilby Richard Lawley-Thompson, 2nd Baron Wenlock.





Pigott of Edgmond.

arms_page215b.jpg

The Pigotts were formerly seated at Chetwynd in this county, which they inherited from the coheiress of Peshall in the fourteenth century.

The Pigotts used to live at Chetwynd in this county, which they inherited from the coheiress of Peshall in the fourteenth century.

The family came originally from Cheshire; William Pigott of Butley in the parish of Prestbury in that county, who died in 1376, was grandfather of Richard Pigott of Butley who married the heiress of Peshall. Chetwynd was sold about 1776, and the rectory of Edgmond purchased by Thomas Pigott, Esq., in the reign of James I.

The family originally came from Cheshire; William Pigott of Butley, in the parish of Prestbury in that county, who died in 1376, was the grandfather of Richard Pigott of Butley, who married the heiress of Peshall. Chetwynd was sold around 1776, and the rectory of Edgmond was purchased by Thomas Pigott, Esq., during the reign of James I.

See Blakeway, p. 84; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, p. 84; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Ermine, three fusils in fess sable. The coat formerly borne by this family, founded on the arms of Chetwynd, was, Azure, a chevron between three mullets or, on a chief ermine three fusils sable.

Arms.—Ermine, three fusils in fess sable. The coat that this family used before, inspired by the Chetwynd arms, was Azure, a chevron between three mullets or, on a chief ermine three fusils sable.

Present Representative, the Rev. John Dryden Pigott.

Present Representative, the Rev. John Dryden Pigott.





Thornes of Llwyntidman Hall.

arms_page216.jpg

The name is local, from Thornes in the parish of Shenstone, in the county of Stafford, where Robert, son of Roger de la Thornes, was resident early in the fourteenth century. He was elected burgess for Shrewsbury in 1357, a position subsequently filled by several of his descendants. The family also became seated at Shelvock in this county at an early period. Thomas Thornes of that place erected a mansion on the old family estate at Thornes in the reign of Edward IV., which estate was sold by his descendant Roger Thornes in 1507. Shelvock continued in the family until the extinction of the eldest branch of it in 1678. The present family descend from Nicholas Thornes of Melverley, great-uncle of Richard Thornes who was sheriff of this county in 1610.

The name is local, originating from Thornes in the parish of Shenstone, in Staffordshire, where Robert, son of Roger de la Thornes, lived in the early fourteenth century. He was elected representative for Shrewsbury in 1357, a position later held by several of his descendants. The family also established themselves in Shelvock in this county at an early date. Thomas Thornes from that area built a mansion on the old family estate at Thornes during the reign of Edward IV., which was sold by his descendant Roger Thornes in 1507. Shelvock remained with the family until the main branch died out in 1678. The current family descends from Nicholas Thornes of Melverley, the great-uncle of Richard Thornes, who served as sheriff of this county in 1610.

See Sanders's History of Shenstone, p. 215; Blakeway, p. 101; and Morris MSS.

See Sanders's History of Shenstone, p. 215; Blakeway, p. 101; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Sable, a lion rampant guardant argent.

Coat of Arms.—Black background with a silver lion standing tall and facing forward.

Present Representative, Thomas William Thornes, Esq.

Present Representative, Thomas William Thornes, Esq.





Harries of Cruckton.

arms_page217a.jpg

The ancestor of this family was of Cruckton in the parish of Pontesbury in 1463. It has been supposed that the Harries's are of the old race of "Fitz-Henry," mentioned in ancient deeds of this county, and who were seated at Little Sutton prior to the reign of Edward III.

The ancestor of this family was from Cruckton in the parish of Pontesbury in 1463. It's believed that the Harries family descends from the old line of "Fitz-Henry," noted in historical documents of this county, who lived at Little Sutton before the reign of Edward III.

See Blakeway, p. 178; and Morris MSS.

See Blakeway, p. 178; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Ermine, three bars azure, over all three annulets or.

Coat of Arms.—White background, featuring three blue horizontal stripes, with three gold rings on top.

Present Representative, Francis Harries, Esq.

Present Rep, Francis Harries, Esq.





Salwey of Moor Park.

arms_page217b.jpg

About the reign of Henry III. William Salwey was Lord of Leacroft, a hamlet in the parish of Cannock in Staffordshire; hence the family removed to Stanford in Worcestershire; of' which John Salwey was owner in the third of Henry IV. But this estate was carried by an heiress to Sir Francis Winnington in the reign of Charles II. Richard Salwey, younger brother of Edward Salwey of Stanford, was seated at Richard's Castle in the county of Hereford at the time of the Protectorate. His grandson Richard was of the Moor Park, where he died in 1759, and was succeeded by his great-nephew, whose grandson is the present representative of this ancient family. See Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, p. 200; Nash's Worcestershire, ii. 369; and Morris MSS.

About the reign of Henry III, William Salwey was the Lord of Leacroft, a small village in the Cannock parish in Staffordshire. The family later moved to Stanford in Worcestershire, where John Salwey owned it during the reign of Henry IV. This estate eventually passed to Sir Francis Winnington through an heiress in the reign of Charles II. Richard Salwey, the younger brother of Edward Salwey of Stanford, lived at Richard's Castle in Hereford at the time of the Protectorate. His grandson Richard was at Moor Park, where he died in 1759, and he was succeeded by his great-nephew, whose grandson is the current representative of this ancient family. See Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, p. 200; Nash's Worcestershire, ii. 369; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Sable, a saltier engrailed or.

Arms.—Black, a saltire engrailed gold.

Present Representative, John Salwey, Esq.

Present Rep, John Salwey, Esq.





Borough of Chetwynd.

arms_page218.jpg

Lineally descended from Robert "Borowe," noticed by Leland in his Itinerary, which Robert died in 1418, and was father of Robert surnamed de Stokeden, Lord of Erdborough in the county of Leicester.

Lineally descended from Robert "Borowe," mentioned by Leland in his Itinerary, who died in 1418, and was the father of Robert nicknamed de Stokeden, Lord of Erdborough in the county of Leicester.

Chetwynd was purchased by Thomas Borough, Esq., in 1803, the family having been previously for many years resident at Derby.

Chetwynd was bought by Thomas Borough, Esq., in 1803, with the family having lived in Derby for many years before that.

See Glover's History of the County of Derby, 8vo. 1833, vol. ii. p. 558, who refers to the genealogy of the family in the College of Arms, 4 Norfolk, p. 189; Nichols's Leicestershire, ii. 528; and Morris MSS.

See Glover's History of the County of Derby, 8vo. 1833, vol. ii. p. 558, who refers to the genealogy of the family in the College of Arms, 4 Norfolk, p. 189; Nichols's Leicestershire, ii. 528; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Gules, the stem and trunk of a tree eradicated, as also couped, sprouting out two branches argent. In 1702 a frightful modern coat founded on the preceding, with the shield of Pallas dependent from an oak-tree or, was granted by the College of Arms.

Arms.—Red, with the stem and trunk of a pulled-out and cut-off tree, sprouting two silver branches. In 1702, a striking modern coat inspired by the earlier design was granted by the College of Arms, showcasing the shield of Pallas hanging from a golden oak tree.

Present Representative, John Charles Burton Borough, Esq.

Present Representative, John Charles Burton Borough, Esq.





SOMERSETSHIRE.

Knightly.

Poulett of Hinton St. George, Earl Poulett 1706; Baron 1627.

arms_page219.jpg

Paulet, in the hundred of North Petherton in this county, gave name to this historical family, the first on record being Sir William de Paulet, who died in 1242. He was of Leigh in Devonshire, which, with Rode in Somersetshire, successively became the family seat. Hinton St. George, which came from the heiress of Denebaud in the reign of Henry VI., is noticed by Leland as "a right goodly manor place of fre stone, with two goodly high tourres embattled in the ynner court," and has ever since remained the seat of this the elder branch of the family. The Marquesses of Winchester (1551) and the extinct Dukes of Bolton descend from William second son of Sir John Paulet of Paulet, who died in 1378. They were of Basing in Hampshire, derived through the heiress of Poynings from the great house of St.John, in the reign of Henry VI.

Paulet, in the hundred of North Petherton in this county, gave its name to this historical family, with the first on record being Sir William de Paulet, who died in 1242. He was from Leigh in Devonshire, which, along with Rode in Somerset, became the family seat. Hinton St. George, acquired from the heiress of Denebaud during the reign of Henry VI, is described by Leland as "a really good manor place made of freestone, with two impressive high towers in the inner court," and has since remained the seat of the elder branch of the family. The Marquesses of Winchester (1551) and the now-extinct Dukes of Bolton are descendants of William, the second son of Sir John Paulet of Paulet, who died in 1378. They were from Basing in Hampshire and trace their lineage through the heiress of Poynings from the prominent St. John family during the reign of Henry VI.

See Leland's Itinerary, ii. fol. 55, vi. fol. 11; Brydges's Collins, ii. 367, iv. 1; Collinson's History of Somersetshire, ii. p. 165. For an account of Hinton St. George, the Topographer, vol. i. p. 171, vol. ii. p.354. For Basing, Gent. Mag. 1787, p. 680.

See Leland's Itinerary, ii. fol. 55, vi. fol. 11; Brydges's Collins, ii. 367, iv. 1; Collinson's History of Somersetshire, ii. p. 165. For an account of Hinton St. George, the Topographer, vol. i. p. 171, vol. ii. p. 354. For Basing, Gent. Mag. 1787, p. 680.

Arms.—Sable, three swords in pile, their points towards the base, argent, the pomels and hilts or. Gules, a pair of wings conjoined in lure argent, being the coat of his mother the heiress of Reyney, was borne by Sir John Paulet in the 15th of Richard II.

Arms.—Black, featuring three silver swords stacked with their points facing down, complete with gold pommels and hilts. Red, displaying a pair of wings joined in silver, represents the coat of arms of his mother, the heiress of Reyney, which was carried by Sir John Paulet in the 15th year of Richard II.

Present Representative, William Poulett, 6th Earl Poulett.

Present Representative, William Poulett, 6th Earl Poulett.





Speke of Jordans.

arms_page220.jpg

This is a younger branch of an ancient family descended from Richard le Espek, who lived in the reign of Henry II. Wemworthy and Brampton, in the county of Devon, were the original seats; but in the time of Henry VI. Sir John Speke, having married an heiress of Beauchamp, became possessed of the manor of Whitelackington in this county, which for eleven generations continued the inheritance of his descendants in the male line, when an heiress carried it to the Norths, Earls of Guildford. Jordans, a hamlet in the manor of Ashill, also inherited from the Beauchamps, appears to be the only remnant of the former possessions of this venerable house.

This is a younger branch of an ancient family that descends from Richard le Espek, who lived during the reign of Henry II. Wemworthy and Brampton, located in Devon, were the original estates; however, during the time of Henry VI, Sir John Speke, after marrying an heiress of Beauchamp, acquired the manor of Whitelackington in this county. This manor was passed down through eleven generations of his male descendants until it was eventually inherited by an heiress who gave it to the Norths, Earls of Guildford. Jordans, a small village in the manor of Ashill, also inherited from the Beauchamps and seems to be the only remnant of the former holdings of this venerable family.

See Leland's Itinerary, ii. ff. 51, 55; Topographer, i. 507; and Collinson's History of Somersetshire, i. pp. 12, 66.

See Leland's Itinerary, ii. ff. 51, 55; Topographer, i. 507; and Collinson's History of Somersetshire, i. pp. 12, 66.

Arms.—Barry of eight argent and azure, an eagle with two heads displayed gules.

Arms.—Divided into eight sections in silver and blue, a two-headed eagle displayed in red.

Present Representative, William Speke, Esq.

Rep. William Speke, Esq.





Gentle.

Trevelyan of Nettlecomb, Baronet 1661-2.

arms_page221.jpg

The name sufficiently implies that this is a Cornish family, traced to Nicholas de Trevelyan living in the reign of Edward I., whose ancestors were of Trevelyan, in the parish of St. Vehap, near Fowey, at a still earlier period. Nettlecomb was inherited from the heiress of Whalesborough towards the end of the fifteenth century. The Trevelyans suffered for their loyalty during the Usurpation, and were rewarded by the baronetcy on the Restoration. The estate of Wallington, in the county of Northumberland, came from the heiress of Calverley of Calverley in the last century.

The name clearly indicates that this is a Cornish family, originating from Nicholas de Trevelyan, who lived during the reign of Edward I. His ancestors were from Trevelyan in the parish of St. Vehap, near Fowey, even earlier than that. Nettlecomb was inherited from the heiress of Whalesborough towards the end of the fifteenth century. The Trevelyans faced difficulties due to their loyalty during the Usurpation but were honored with a baronetcy after the Restoration. The Wallington estate in Northumberland was inherited from the heiress of Calverley of Calverley in the last century.

Younger Branch, Trevelyan of Nether-Witton in the county of Northumberland.

Younger Branch, Trevelyan of Nether-Witton in Northumberland.

See Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 558; Collinson's Somersetshire, iii. p. 539; Gilbert's Cornwall, i. 564; Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. i. pt. 2. p. 262; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. p. 353.

See Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 558; Collinson's Somersetshire, iii. p. 539; Gilbert's Cornwall, i. 564; Hodgson's History of Northumberland, vol. i. pt. 2. p. 262; and Wotton's Baronetage, iii. p. 353.

Arms.—Gules, a land-horse argent, armed or, coming out of the sea party per fess wavy azure and of the second. This coat is traditionally derived from one of the family swimming on horseback from the rocks called Seven Stones to the Land's End, at the time of an inundation. The more ancient arms are said to have been a lion rampant holding a baton.

Coat of Arms.—Red background, with a silver horse, adorned in gold, rising from the sea split by wavy blue and silver. This design is typically inspired by a tale of a family member swimming on horseback from the rocks known as Seven Stones to Land's End during a flood. The earlier coat of arms is said to have shown a lion standing on its hind legs holding a staff.

Present Representative, Sir Walter Calverley Trevelyan, 6th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Walter Calverley Trevelyan, 6th Baronet.





Upton (called Smyth) of Ashton-Court, Baronet 1859.

arms_page222.jpg

An ancient Cornish family, said to have been originally of Upton, in that county, or, according to Prince in his Worthies of Devon, named from Upton in the parish of Collumpton in Devonshire, and fixed at Portlinch in the parish of Newton Ferrers, by a match with the heiress of Mohun, about the end of the fifteenth century. Here the elder branch was long seated, and became extinct in 1709. The present family descend from a younger brother, who settled at Lupton in Devonshire: his descendant was of Ingmire Hall in Westmerland, derived from the heiress of Otway about the beginning of the eighteenth century. The present representative, succeeding to the estates of the Smyths of Ashton, assumed that name, and was created a Baronet in 1859.

An old Cornish family, believed to have originally come from Upton in that county, or according to Prince in his Worthies of Devon, named after Upton in the parish of Collumpton in Devon, established themselves at Portlinch in the parish of Newton Ferrers through a marriage with the heiress of Mohun around the end of the fifteenth century. The senior branch was settled there for a long time and went extinct in 1709. The current family descends from a younger brother who moved to Lupton in Devon: his descendant was at Ingmire Hall in Westmorland, linked through the heiress of Otway around the early eighteenth century. The current head of the family, who inherited the estates of the Smyths of Ashton, adopted that name and was made a Baronet in 1859.

Younger Branches. Upton of Glyde-Court in the county of Louth, descended from the third son of John Upton of Lupton, living in 1620; and Upton, Baron Templetown, descended from Henry second son of Arthur Upton of Lupton. This Henry came into Ireland in 1598, a captain in the army under the Earl of Essex, and established himself in the county of Antrim.

Younger Branches. Upton of Glyde-Court in County Louth is descended from the third son of John Upton of Lupton, who lived in 1620. Upton, Baron Templetown, is descended from Henry, the second son of Arthur Upton of Lupton. This Henry came to Ireland in 1598 as a captain in the army under the Earl of Essex and settled in County Antrim.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1701, p. 572; Westcote's Devonshire, p. 519; and Archdall's Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, vii. p. 152.

See Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1701, p. 572; Westcote's Devonshire, p. 519; and Archdall's Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, vii. p. 152.

Arms.—Sable, a cross moline argent.

Arms.—Black, a silver cross moline.

Present Representative, Sir John Henry Greville Upton Smythe, Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Henry Greville Upton Smythe, Baronet.





SOUTHAMPTONSHIRE.

Knightly.

Tichborne of Tichborne, Baronet 1620.

arms_page223.jpg

Of the great antiquity of this family there is no doubt, they having been seated at their manor of Tichborne from the reign of Henry II., at which period Sir Roger de Tichborne, their first recorded ancestor, was lord of that manor. The immediate ancestors of the present family were of Aldershot, in this county, being descended from the second son of the first Baronet. Henry Tichborne, grandson of the celebrated Sir Henry Tichborne, so distinguished during the Great Rebellion in Ireland, and who was fourth son of the first Baronet, was raised to the peerage in Ireland as Baron Ferrard in 1715; he died, and the peerage became extinct, in 1728.

There’s no doubt about the long history of this family, as they’ve been at their manor in Tichborne since the reign of Henry II. At that time, Sir Roger de Tichborne, their first recorded ancestor, was the lord of that manor. The immediate ancestors of the current family were from Aldershot in this county, descending from the second son of the first Baronet. Henry Tichborne, grandson of the well-known Sir Henry Tichborne, who was notable during the Great Rebellion in Ireland and the fourth son of the first Baronet, was made a Baron in Ireland as Baron Ferrard in 1715. He died, and the title became extinct in 1728.

See Wotton's Baronetage, i. 425; Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica, vii. p. 213; and for a notice of Chidiock Tichborne, engaged in the Babington Conspiracy in 1586, see Disraeli's Curiosities of Literature, 1st series, vol. iii. p. 95.

See Wotton's Baronetage, i. 425; Collectanea Topographica et Genealogica, vii. p. 213; and for a mention of Chidiock Tichborne, involved in the Babington Conspiracy in 1586, see Disraeli's Curiosities of Literature, 1st series, vol. iii. p. 95.

Arms.—Vair, a chief or, borne by Sir John Tichborne in the sixth of Henry IV.

Arms.—Vair, a gold chief, held by Sir John Tichborne in the sixth year of Henry IV.

Present Representative, Sir Alfred Joseph, Doughty Tichborne, 11th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Alfred Joseph, Doughty Tichborne, 11th Baronet.





Oglander of Nunwell, Baronet 1665.

arms_page224.jpg

Richard de Okelandre, the patriarch of his family, is supposed to have been of Norman origin, and was Lord of Nunwell, in the Isle of Wight, the present seat, from the time of King John. Seventeenth in direct male descent from Richard, was Sir John Oglander, Knt., a great sufferer, both in person and fortune, for his zealous attachment to his sovereign King Charles I. He died before the Restoration, but his loyalty was recognised by the baronetcy conferred upon his son, a worthy successor to his father, by Charles II. in 1665.

Richard de Okelandre, the head of his family, is believed to have been of Norman descent and was Lord of Nunwell on the Isle of Wight, the current estate, since the time of King John. Seventeenth in direct male lineage from Richard was Sir John Oglander, Knt., who suffered greatly, both physically and financially, due to his strong loyalty to his sovereign King Charles I. He passed away before the Restoration, but his loyalty was honored with a baronetcy granted to his son, a deserving successor, by Charles II in 1665.

See Hutchins's History of Dorset, i, p. 450, for an account of the family under "Parnham," which came from the heiress of Strode; see also Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 492.

See Hutchins's History of Dorset, i, p. 450, for an account of the family under "Parnham," which came from the heiress of Strode; see also Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 492.

Arms.—Azure, a stork between three cross-crosslets fitchée or.

Coat of Arms.—Blue background, a stork positioned between three black crosslets with pointed ends.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Oglander, 7th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Oglander, 7th Baronet.





Wallop of Wallop, Earl of Portsmouth 1743.

arms_page225.jpg

The true and original name of this family is Barton, Peter de Barton, lord of West Barton, in this county, having married Alice, only daughter and heiress of Sir Robert de Wallop, who died in the eleventh year of Edward I. His great-grandson Richard assumed the name of Wallop, and was returned as one of the knights of the shire for the county of Southampton in the second of Edward III. Over and Nether Wallop, so called, says Camden, "from Well-hop, that is, a pretty well in the side of a hill," continued till the reign of Henry V. the principal seat, when Margaret de Valoynes brought into the family the manor of Farley, afterwards called Farley-Wallop, which has since been the usual residence of the Wallops; of whom Sir John was greatly distinguished in the reign of Henry VII., and Sir Henry in Ireland in that of Elizabeth. Robert Wallop, grandson of Sir Henry, unfortunately taking part against his sovereign Charles I., and sitting as one of his judges, though he did not sign the fatal warrant, fell into universal contempt after the Restoration, and died in the Tower of London in 1667. He was great-grandfaher of the first peer.

The true and original name of this family is Barton. Peter de Barton, lord of West Barton in this county, married Alice, the only daughter and heiress of Sir Robert de Wallop, who died in the eleventh year of Edward I. His great-grandson Richard took on the name Wallop and was elected as one of the knights of the shire for the county of Southampton in the second year of Edward III. Over and Nether Wallop, named by Camden as "Well-hop, meaning a nice spring on the side of a hill," remained the main seat until the reign of Henry V. That was when Margaret de Valoynes brought the manor of Farley into the family, which later became known as Farley-Wallop and has since been the usual residence of the Wallops. Sir John distinguished himself during the reign of Henry VII, while Sir Henry made a name for himself in Ireland during the reign of Elizabeth. Robert Wallop, grandson of Sir Henry, unfortunately took sides against his sovereign Charles I and served as one of his judges. Although he didn’t sign the fatal warrant, he fell into widespread disrepute after the Restoration and died in the Tower of London in 1667. He was the great-grandfather of the first peer.

See Brydges's Collins, iv. p. 291.

See Brydges's Collins, iv. p. 291.

Arms.—Argent, a bend wavy sable. This coat was borne by Monsieur John de Barton in the reign of Richard II. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Silver with a wavy black stripe. This coat was used by Mr. John de Barton during the reign of Richard II. (Roll.)

Present Representative, Isaac Newton Wallop, 5th Earl of Portsmouth.

Present Representative, Isaac Newton Wallop, 5th Earl of Portsmouth.





Cope of Bramshill, Baronet 1611.

arms_page226.jpg

The Copes appear in the character of civil servants of the crown in the reign of Richard II. and Henry IV., and were rewarded with large grants of land in the counties of Northampton and Buckingham. Hardwick and Hanwell, both in the neighbourhood of Banbury, were subsequently the family seats, and are noticed by Leland, who calls the latter "a very pleasant and gallant house." Towards the end of the seventeenth century the family appear to have been established at Bramshill, traditionally said to have been built for Henry Prince of Wales, eldest son of King James I.

The Copes served as civil servants for the crown during the reigns of Richard II and Henry IV, and they received large land grants in Northampton and Buckingham counties. Hardwick and Hanwell, both near Banbury, later became the family estates, and Leland mentions them, referring to the latter as "a very pleasant and gallant house." By the late seventeenth century, the family seems to have settled at Bramshill, which is traditionally believed to have been built for Henry, Prince of Wales, the eldest son of King James I.

See Wotton's Baronetage i. p. 112; and Beesley's History of Banbury, p. 190.

See Wotton's Baronetage vol. 1, p. 112; and Beesley's History of Banbury, p. 190.

Arms.—Argent, on a chevron azure between three roses gules, slipped and leaved vert, as many fleurs-de-lis or. The original coat was, Argent, a boar passant sable, which William Cope, Cofferer to Henry VII., abandoned for Argent, three coffers sable, allusive to his office; but he afterwards had assigned to him the present arms alluding to the royal badges of the crown.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a blue chevron between three red roses, featuring green stems and leaves, and as many gold fleurs-de-lis. The original design was Silver, depicting a black boar walking, which William Cope, Treasurer to Henry VII, relinquished for Silver, three black coffers, reflecting his role; however, he was later awarded the current arms, representing the royal symbols of the crown.

Present Representative, the Rev. Sir William Henry Cope, 12th Baronet.

Present Representative, the Rev. Sir William Henry Cope, 12th Baronet.





STAFFORDSHIRE.

Knightly.

Okeover of Okeover.

arms_page227.jpg

Ormus, at the period of the Norman Conquest was Lord of Okeover by grant of Nigel, Abbot of Burton. He is the direct ancestor of this venerable house, which has been ever since in possession of the ancient seat which gives name to the family, and which lies on the very edge of the county, near Ashbourne in Derbyshire.

Ormus, at the time of the Norman Conquest, was the Lord of Okeover by a grant from Nigel, Abbot of Burton. He is the direct ancestor of this respected family, which has since held the historic estate that bears their name, located right on the edge of the county, near Ashbourne in Derbyshire.

See Wood's MSS. 8594, vol. 6, for a very curious and valuable cartulary of the Okeovers, and Dodsworth's MSS. 5037, vol. 96, fol. 17 (both in the Bodleian Library); see also Erdeswick's Staffordshire, Harwood's ed. 1844, p. 487; Shaw's Staffordshire, vol. i. p. 26; and the Topographer, ii. p. 313.

See Wood's MSS. 8594, vol. 6, for a really interesting and valuable collection of documents about the Okeovers, and Dodsworth's MSS. 5037, vol. 96, fol. 17 (both in the Bodleian Library); also check out Erdeswick's Staffordshire, Harwood's ed. 1844, p. 487; Shaw's Staffordshire, vol. i. p. 26; and the Topographer, ii. p. 313.

Arms.—Ermine, on a chief gules three bezants. This coat was borne by Monsieur Philip de Oker, in the reign of Richard II. (Roll).

Coat of Arms.—Ermine, with a red chief featuring three gold coins. This coat was used by Monsieur Philip de Oker during the reign of Richard II. (Roll).

Present Representative, Haughton Charles Okeover, Esq.

Present Representative, Haughton Charles Okeover, Esq.





Bagot of Bagot's Bromley; Baron Bagot 1780; Baronet 1627.

arms_page228.jpg

A most ancient family, also coeval with the Conquest, descended from Bagod, who at the time of the compilation of Domesday Book held Bromley of Robert de Stadford or Stafford. In the reign of Richard I. the male line of the Staffords failing, Milicent Stafford married Henry Bagot of this family, and their issue, assuming their mother's name, were progenitors of the illustrious house of Stafford, Dukes of Buckingham. Blythfield in this county, which came from an heiress of that name, has been the seat of the Bagots from the thirteenth century.

A very old family, dating back to the time of the Conquest, came from Bagod, who, when the Domesday Book was compiled, held Bromley from Robert de Stafford. During the reign of Richard I, with the male line of the Staffords ending, Milicent Stafford married Henry Bagot from this family, and their children, taking their mother's name, became the ancestors of the prominent House of Stafford, Dukes of Buckingham. Blythfield in this county, which came from an heiress of that name, has been the Bagots' residence since the thirteenth century.

Younger Branches. Chester of Chicheley Hall, co. Bucks, and Bagot of Pype Hayes, co. Warwick, descended from the second and third sons of Sir Walter W. Bagot, father of the first Lord Bagot.

Younger Branches. Chester of Chicheley Hall, Bucks, and Bagot of Pype Hayes, Warwick, are descendants of the second and third sons of Sir Walter W. Bagot, the father of the first Lord Bagot.

See Bagot Memorials, privately printed, 4to. 1824; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 47; and Erdeswick, p. 262.

See Bagot Memorials, privately printed, 4to. 1824; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 47; and Erdeswick, p. 262.

Arms.—Ermine, two chevrons azure. A former coat was, Argent, a chevron gules between three martlets sable, which was used from the reign of Edward III. to that of Henry VIII. (Rolls.) The present coat is of still greater antiquity.

Arms.—Ermine, two blue chevrons. The earlier coat was Silver, a red chevron between three black martlets, used from the reign of Edward III to that of Henry VIII. (Rolls.) The current coat is even older.

Present Representative, William Bagot, 3rd Baron Bagot.

Present Representative, William Bagot, 3rd Baron Bagot.





Gifford of Chillington.

arms_page229.jpg

A noble Norman family, which is traced to the Conquest, and of which there were in Leland's time four "notable houses" remaining in England, in the counties of Devon, Southampton, Stafford, and Buckingham. All with the exception of the third have been long extinct. The Giffords have been seated in Staffordshire since the reign of Henry II., when Peter Gifford, by the gift of Peter Corbesone, became Lord of the Manor of Chillington, ever since their principal residence. He is called in the Deed of Gift, "Nepos uxoris meae." This family had the honour to be concerned in the preservation of King Charles II. after the Battle of Worcester.

A noble Norman family, tracing its roots back to the Conquest, had four “notable houses” in England during Leland's time, located in the counties of Devon, Southampton, Stafford, and Buckingham. Except for the third, all have long been extinct. The Giffords have been established in Staffordshire since the reign of Henry II, when Peter Gifford became Lord of the Manor of Chillington through a gift from Peter Corbesone, which has since been their main residence. He is referred to in the Deed of Gift as "Nepos uxoris meae." This family played a significant role in the protection of King Charles II after the Battle of Worcester.

See Erdeswick, p. 158, corrected from Huntbach's MSS. penes Lord Wrottesley.

See Erdeswick, p. 158, corrected from Huntbach's manuscripts in the possession of Lord Wrottesley.

Arms.—Azure, three stirrups with leathers or. The more ancient coat, which was used by the elder line of the Giffords, who were Earls of Buckingham, was, Gules, three lions passant argent.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, featuring three stirrups with straps or. The older coat, used by the senior line of the Giffords, who were Earls of Buckingham, was Red, with three silver lions walking.

Present Representative, Thomas William Gifford, Esq.

Present Representative, Thomas William Gifford, Esq.





Wrottesley of Wrottesley: Baron Wrottesley 1838; Baronet 1542.

arms_page230.jpg

"Sumetime," writes Leland, "the Wrotesleys were men of more land than they bee now, and greate with the Earles of Warwick; yet he hath 200 markes of londe; at Wrotesley is a fayre house and a parker" and here, it may be added, the family are supposed to have been seated from the period of the Conquest. The pedigree however is not proved beyond William de Wrottesley, lord of that manor before the reign of Henry III., father of Sir Hugh, who, joining the insurgent Barons in the reign of Henry III., forfeited his estate, redeemed under the dictum de Kenelworth for 60 marcs. His great-grandson Sir Hugh Wrottesley, one of the "Founders" of the Order of the Garter, who died in 1380-1, is the direct ancestor of the present lord.

"Sometimes," writes Leland, "the Wrotesleys had more land than they do now and were influential with the Earls of Warwick; however, he has 200 marks of land; at Wrotesley, there is a beautiful house and a park." It should be noted that the family is believed to have been settled there since the time of the Conquest. However, the lineage isn't proven beyond William de Wrottesley, who was the lord of that manor before the reign of Henry III, and the father of Sir Hugh. Sir Hugh joined the rebel Barons during Henry III's reign, lost his estate, and redeemed it under the dictum de Kenelworth for 60 marks. His great-grandson, Sir Hugh Wrottesley, one of the "Founders" of the Order of the Garter, who died in 1380-1, is the direct ancestor of the current lord.

See Leland's Itinerary in Coll. Topog. et Genealogica, iii. 340; Erdeswick, p. 359; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 345; and Shaw's Staffordshire, ii. 205, kindly corrected by the Hon. Charles Wrottesley.

See Leland's Itinerary in Coll. Topog. et Genealogica, iii. 340; Erdeswick, p. 359; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 345; and Shaw's Staffordshire, ii. 205, kindly corrected by the Hon. Charles Wrottesley.

Arms.—Or, three piles sable and a quarter ermine. The more ancient coat, as appears by seals to original deeds of the years 1298 and 1333-37, preserved at Wrottesley, was fretty. Sir Hugh de Wrottesleye bore the present arms in 1349 and 1381. But he is also stated, on the authority of the Roll of the reign of Richard II., to have used, Or, a bend engrailed gules. Sir William Wrottesley, father of Sir Hugh, K.G., married Joan, daughter of Roger Basset, which will account for the present arms, which belonged to the Bassets of Warwickshire.

Coat of Arms.—Gold, three black piles and a quarter of ermine. The older version, as indicated by seals on original documents from 1298 and 1333-37, located at Wrottesley, was fretty. Sir Hugh de Wrottesleye used the current arms in 1349 and 1381. However, according to the Roll from the reign of Richard II, he was also noted to have used Gold, a bend engrailed red. Sir William Wrottesley, the father of Sir Hugh, K.G., married Joan, the daughter of Roger Basset, which explains the current arms that belonged to the Bassets of Warwickshire.

Present Representative, John Wrottesley, 2nd Baron Wrottesley.

Present Representative, John Wrottesley, 2nd Baron Wrottesley.





Broughton of Broughton, Baronet 1660.

arms_page231.jpg

"The Broughtons descend in the male line from one of the most ancient families of the county of Chester, the Vernons of Shipbrook. Richard de Vernon, a younger brother of this house, was father of Adam de Napton, in the county of Warwick, whose issue assumed their local name from Broughton in Staffordshire. The pedigrees vary as to the exact point of connection, and, confused and contradictory as the Shipbrooke pedigree is at this period, there can be little hope of its being positively identified; but the general fact of descent is allowed by all authorities."

The Broughtons come from one of the oldest families in Chester, the Vernons of Shipbrook. Richard de Vernon, a younger brother from this family, was the father of Adam de Napton, who lived in Warwick. Adam's descendants took their local name from Broughton in Staffordshire. The family trees differ on the exact connection, and although the Shipbrook lineage is confusing and inconsistent at this time, there’s little hope of it being clearly identified. However, the general fact of their descent is acknowledged by all experts.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, iii. 269; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 259; and Erdeswick, p. 111.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, iii. 269; Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 259; and Erdeswick, p. 111.

Arms.—Argent, two bars gules, on a canton of the last a cross of the first. In the reign of Richard II. Monsieur Thomas de Broughton bore, Azure, a cross engrailed argent. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with two red bars, and a red canton featuring a white cross. During Richard II's reign, Monsieur Thomas de Broughton had Blue, with a white engrailed cross. (Roll.)

Present Representative, Sir Henry Delves Broughton, ninth Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Delves Broughton, ninth Baronet.





Mainwaring of Whitmore.

arms_page232.jpg

The first recorded ancestor of this great and widely-spreading family is Ranulphus, a Norman, Lord of Warmincham, in Cheshire, at the period of the Domesday Survey; where his descendants remained seated for two centuries. In the reign of Henry III. they were of Over-Peover in the same county, and remained there until the principal male line became extinct in the person of Sir Henry Mainwaring of Peover, Baronet, who died unmarried in 1797. Whitmore was inherited by Edward ninth son of Sir John Mainwaring of Peover, on his marriage with the heiress of Humphry de Boghey or Bohun of Whitmore. This was in the year 1519. The senior line of the Mainwarings were on the loyal side during the great Rebellion, and in 1745 opposed to the pretensions of the house of Stuart. But the Whitmore branch favoured the Parliamentary interest.

The first recorded ancestor of this large and far-reaching family is Ranulphus, a Norman, Lord of Warmincham in Cheshire, during the time of the Domesday Survey; his descendants lived there for two centuries. During the reign of Henry III, they were in Over-Peover in the same county and stayed until the main male line ended with Sir Henry Mainwaring of Peover, Baronet, who died unmarried in 1797. Whitmore was passed down to Edward, the ninth son of Sir John Mainwaring of Peover, when he married the heiress of Humphry de Boghey or Bohun of Whitmore in 1519. The main line of the Mainwarings supported the loyal side during the great Rebellion and, in 1745, opposed the claims of the house of Stuart. However, the Whitmore branch supported the Parliamentary side.

Younger Branch. Mainwaring of Oteley Park, in the parish of Ellesmere in Shropshire, sprung from Randle, third son of Edward Mainwaring of Whitmore.

Younger Branch. Mainwaring of Oteley Park, in the parish of Ellesmere in Shropshire, comes from Randle, the third son of Edward Mainwaring of Whitmore.

Extinct Branches. Maynwaring of Ightfield, co. Salop; extinct 1712. (See Blakeway, Sheriffs of Shropshire, pp. 83, 133.) Mainwaring of Kermincham, co. Chester, extinct 1783. (See Ormerod's Cheshire, vol. iii. p. 46.) And Mainwaring of Bromborough, in the same county, extinct 1827.

Extinct Branches. Mainwaring of Ightfield, Salop; extinct 1712. (See Blakeway, Sheriffs of Shropshire, pp. 83, 133.) Mainwaring of Kermincham, Chester, extinct 1783. (See Ormerod's Cheshire, vol. iii. p. 46.) And Mainwaring of Bromborough, in the same county, extinct 1827.

See Erdeswick's Staffordshire, p. 78; and Ormerod, vol. i. p. 368; vol. ii. p. 239; vol. iii. p. 447.

See Erdeswick's Staffordshire, p. 78; and Ormerod, vol. i. p. 368; vol. ii. p. 239; vol. iii. p. 447.

Arms.—Argent, two bars gules.

Arms.—Silver, two red bars.

Present Representative, Rowland Mainwaring, Esq.

Present Rep, Rowland Mainwaring, Esq.





Arden of Longcroft.

arms_page233.jpg

No family in England can claim a more noble origin than the house of Arden, descended in the male line from the Saxon Earls of Warwick before the Conquest. The name of Arden was assumed from the Woodlands of Arden, in the North of Warwickshire, by Siward de Arden, in the reign of Henry I.; which Siward was grandson of Alwin the Sheriff in the reign of Edward the Confessor. The elder line of the family was long seated at Park-Hall in Warwickshire, and became extinct in 1643. A younger branch descended from Simon second son of Thomas Arden, of Park-Hall, Esq. settled at Longcroft, in the parish of Yoxall, in the reign of Elizabeth, and now represents this most ancient and noble family.

No family in England can claim a more distinguished origin than the Arden family, which can trace its lineage directly back to the Saxon Earls of Warwick before the Conquest. The name Arden was taken from the Woodlands of Arden in Northern Warwickshire by Siward de Arden during the reign of Henry I. Siward was the grandson of Alwin the Sheriff, who served during the reign of Edward the Confessor. The older branch of the family was based at Park-Hall in Warwickshire for many years, but it became extinct in 1643. A younger branch descended from Simon, the second son of Thomas Arden of Park-Hall, Esq., settled at Longcroft in the parish of Yoxall during the reign of Elizabeth and now carries on the legacy of this very ancient and noble family.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd edit. vol. ii. p. 295; Shaw's Staffordshire, vol. i. p. 102; and Erdeswick, p. 279; also a paper by George Ormerod, Esq. LL.D., the historian of Cheshire, "On the connection of Arden, or Arderne, of Cheshire, with the Ardens of Warwickshire," in "The Topographer and Genealogist," vol. i. 1846.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed. vol. ii. p. 295; Shaw's Staffordshire, vol. i. p. 102; and Erdeswick, p. 279; also a paper by George Ormerod, Esq. LL.D., the historian of Cheshire, "On the connection of Arden, or Arderne, of Cheshire, with the Ardens of Warwickshire," in "The Topographer and Genealogist," vol. i. 1846.

Arms.—Ermine, a fess checky or and azure, and so borne by Sir——de Arderne in the reign of Edward II. (Roll.)

Arms.—Ermine, a checkered fess of gold and blue, as used by Sir——de Arderne during the reign of Edward II. (Roll.)

Present Representative, George Pincard Arden, Esq.

Present Representative, George Pincard Arden, Esq.





Meynell of Hore-Cross.

arms_page234.jpg

An ancient Derbyshire family, which can be traced to the reign of Henry II. One of their most ancient possessions was Langley-Meynell, in that county, an estate which remained in the family till the end of the fourteenth century. A younger son at this period was seated at Yeaveley, his grandson at Willington, both in Derbyshire. Bradley, in the same county, became in the seventeenh century, by purchase, the residence of a still younger branch, descended from Francis, fourth son of Godfrey Meynell of Willington: from him descends the present family, who were of Hore-Cross the latter part of the last century. Temple-Newsom, in Yorkshire, was inherited from the Ingrams by the present Mr. Meynell on the death of the Marchioness of Hertford in 1835.

An old Derbyshire family can be traced back to the reign of Henry II. One of their earliest possessions was Langley-Meynell in that county, an estate that stayed in the family until the end of the fourteenth century. A younger son from that time settled at Yeaveley, and his grandson settled at Willington, both in Derbyshire. In the seventeenth century, Bradley, also in Derbyshire, was acquired through purchase by a younger branch of the family, descended from Francis, the fourth son of Godfrey Meynell of Willington; from him comes the current family, who were in Hore-Cross in the latter part of the last century. Temple-Newsom in Yorkshire was inherited by the current Mr. Meynell from the Ingrams after the death of the Marchioness of Hertford in 1835.

Younger Branch. Meynell of Langley-Meynell, Derbyshire, descended from Francis, second son of Francis Meynell, of Willington, who died in 1616.

Younger Branch. Meynell of Langley-Meynell, Derbyshire, is descended from Francis, the second son of Francis Meynell, of Willington, who died in 1616.

See Leland's Itinerary, iv. fo. 17; and Topographer and Genealogist, i. 439, and 494.

See Leland's Itinerary, iv. fo. 17; and Topographer and Genealogist, i. 439, and 494.

Arms.—Vaire argent and sable. This was the coat of De-la-Ward, of which house Hugh de Meynell married the heiress in the reign of Edward III. The proper coat of Meynell was, Paly of six argent and gules, on a bend azure three horseshoes or.

Coat of Arms.—Vaire argent and sable. This was the coat of De-la-Ward, which Hugh de Meynell acquired by marrying the heiress during the reign of Edward III. The original coat of Meynell was Paly of six argent and gules, on a bend azure three horseshoes or.

Present Representative, Hugo Charles Meynell-Ingram, Esq.

Present Representative, Hugo Charles Meynell-Ingram, Esq.





Gentle.

Wolseley of Wolseley, Baronet 1628.

arms_page235.jpg

"The most ancient among all the very ancient families in this county," writes Mr. Harwood in his notes to Erdeswick's Staffordshire. Siward, mentioned as Lord of Wlselei in a deed without date, is the first in the pedigree of this venerable house, who are said to have been resident at Wolseley even before the Norman Conquest, and it has ever since remained their seat and residence.

"The oldest of all the very old families in this county," writes Mr. Harwood in his notes to Erdeswick's Staffordshire. Siward, who is mentioned as Lord of Wolseley in an undated deed, is the first in the family tree of this distinguished house, which is said to have lived in Wolseley even before the Norman Conquest. Since then, it has always been their home and residence.

Younger Branch. Wolseley of Mount Wolseley, in the county of Carlow, Baronet of Ireland (1744), descended from the third son of the second Baronet.

Younger Branch. Wolseley of Mount Wolseley, in County Carlow, Baronet of Ireland (1744), descended from the third son of the second Baronet.

See Erdeswick, p. 203; Wotton's Baronetage, ii. 133.

See Erdeswick, p. 203; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. 2, p. 133.

Arms.—Argent, a talbot passant gules.

Arms.—Silver, a red talbot dog walking.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Michael Wolseley, ninth Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Michael Wolseley, 9th Baronet.





Cotes of Cotes.

arms_page236.jpg

Descended from Richard de Cotes, who was probably son of Thomas de Cotes, living in 1157, when the Black Book of the Exchequer was compiled. About the reign of Henry VI. the family removed to Woodcote, in Shropshire, which has since continued the principal seat, though the more ancient manor of Cotes or "Kothes," on the banks of the Sow, has ever remained the property of this ancient house.

Descended from Richard de Cotes, who was likely the son of Thomas de Cotes, living in 1157 when the Black Book of the Exchequer was compiled. Around the time of Henry VI's reign, the family moved to Woodcote in Shropshire, which has since been their main residence, although the older manor of Cotes or "Kothes," located by the Sow, has always been owned by this historic family.

See Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, p. 103; and Erdeswick, p. 122.

See Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, p. 103; and Erdeswick, p. 122.

Arms.—Quarterly ermine and paly of six or and gules. According to the Visitation of Shropshire in 1623, the ermine was borne in the third and fourth quarter. Erdeswick observes, "It would seem that the Cotes's should derive themselves from the Knightleys, or else they do the Knightleys wrong by usurping their armoury." It may be remarked that Robert, third in descent from the first Robert de Cotes, married a daughter of Richard de Knightley, and from hence perhaps the arms.

Arms.—Quarterly ermine and paly of six or and gules. According to the Visitation of Shropshire in 1623, the ermine was shown in the third and fourth quarters. Erdeswick notes, "It seems that the Cotes family should trace their lineage back to the Knightleys, or they are misrepresenting the Knightleys by claiming their coat of arms." It’s important to mention that Robert, the third in line from the first Robert de Cotes, married a daughter of Richard de Knightley, which might clarify the arms.

Present Representative, John Cotes, Esq.

Present Representative, John Cotes, Esq.





Congreve of Congreve.

arms_page237.jpg

The name, like those of most ancient families, is local, derived from Congreve, in this county, where the ancestors of this house were seated soon after the Conquest.

The name, just like most ancient family names, is local, originating from Congreve in this county, where the ancestors of this family settled shortly after the Conquest.

In the reign of Edward II. William Congreve removed to the adjoining village of Stretton, having married the heiress of Campion of that place. Stretton was sold towards the end of the eighteenth century, but Congreve still continues the inheritance of its ancient lords.

In the rule of Edward II, William Congreve moved to the nearby village of Stretton after marrying the heiress of Campion from there. Stretton was sold near the end of the eighteenth century, but Congreve still holds the legacy of its historic lords.

Younger Branch. Congreve of Walton, Baronet 1812.

Younger Branch. Congreve of Walton, Baronet 1812.

See Erdeswick, p. 167.

See Erdeswick, p. 167.

Arms.—Sable, a chevron between three battleaxes argent. This is, says Erdeswick, the coat of Campion.

Coat of Arms.—Black, with a chevron between three silver battleaxes. This is, according to Erdeswick, the symbol of Campion.

Present Representative, William Walter Congreve, Esq.

Present Representative, William Walter Congreve, Esq.





Sneyd of Keel.

arms_page238.jpg

"The noble race of Sneyds, of great worship and account,"* appear to be denominated from Snead, a hamlet in the parish of Tunstall, in this county, where they were seated as early as the reign of Henry III. By marriage with the heiress of Tunstall they had other lands in that parish, and for two descents were called Snead alias Tunstall. Bradwell, the former seat of this family, was purchased in the reign of Henry IV. The fine old house at Keel, lately taken down and now rebuilt, was erected by Ralph Sneyd, Esq. in 1581. During the Usurpation, the Sneyds being on the loyal side, Keel house narrowly escaped destruction, and many of the ancient evidences were plundered and lost at that time.

"The noble family of Sneyds, who are greatly respected and well-known," appear to be named after Snead, a small village in the parish of Tunstall in this county, where they have been established since the reign of Henry III. Through marriage with the heiress of Tunstall, they acquired additional lands in that parish and were known as Snead alias Tunstall for two generations. Bradwell, their former residence, was purchased during the reign of Henry IV. The historic old house at Keel, which has recently been demolished and rebuilt, was constructed by Ralph Sneyd, Esq. in 1581. During the Usurpation, the Sneyds, being loyalists, nearly lost Keel house to destruction, and many of their ancient documents were stolen and lost during that time.

Younger Branches. Sneyd of Ashcombe, and of Loxley in this county, descended from the second son of William Sneyd, of Keel, who died in 1694: and the Sneyds of Ireland, descended from Wettenhall, Archdeacon of Kilmore, younger brother of the ancestor of the preceding branches.

Younger Branches. Sneyd of Ashcombe and Loxley in this county descends from the second son of William Sneyd of Keel, who died in 1694. The Sneyds of Ireland are descended from Wettenhall, Archdeacon of Kilmore, the younger brother of the ancestor of the previous branches.

See Erdeswick, pp. 20, 25; Leland's Itinerary in Coll. Topog. et Genealog. iii. 342; Gent. Mag. vol. lxxi. p. 28; and Ward's History of the Borough of Stoke-upon-Trent.

See Erdeswick, pp. 20, 25; Leland's Itinerary in Coll. Topog. et Genealog. iii. 342; Gent. Mag. vol. lxxi. p. 28; and Ward's History of the Borough of Stoke-upon-Trent.

Arms.—Argent, a scythe, the blade in chief, the sned and handle in bend sinister sable, on the fess point a fleur-de-lis of the second. This fleur-de-lis is said to have been assumed by Richard de Tunstall, alias Sneyd, after the battle of Poictiers.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, featuring a scythe with the blade at the top, the sned and handle positioned diagonally in black, and a fleur-de-lis of the same color at the center. This fleur-de-lis is thought to have been taken on by Richard de Tunstall, also known as Sneyd, after the battle of Poitiers.

Present Representative, Ralph Sneyd, Esq.

Present Rep, Ralph Sneyd, Esq.

* King's Vale Royal, b. ii. p. 77, who would derive them from Cheshire.




Whitgreave of Moseley.

arms_page239.jpg

In the reign of Henry III., Robert Whitgreave, the ancestor of this family, was seated at Burton near Stafford. Bridgeford, in the vicinity of Whitgreave, from whence the name is derived, and early in the seventeenth century Moseley, successively became the residence of the Whitgreaves, and at the latter place Thomas Whitgreave, Esq. had the honour to shelter his sovereign Charles II. after the battle of Worcester.

During the reign of Henry III, Robert Whitgreave, the ancestor of this family, lived in Burton near Stafford. Bridgeford, close to Whitgreave, where the name comes from, and early in the seventeenth century, Moseley became the home of the Whitgreaves. At Moseley, Thomas Whitgreave, Esq. had the honor of providing refuge to his king, Charles II, after the battle of Worcester.

See Erdeswick, pp. 137, 185, 348.

See Erdeswick, pp. 137, 185, 348.

Arms.—Azure, on a cross quarterly pierced or four chevrons gules. This coat, founded on the arms of Stafford, was granted by Humphry Earl of Stafford to Robert Whitgrave in the 20th of Henry VI. See the grant in Camden's Remains, ed. 1657, p. 221. An augmentation has been lately added, On a chief argent, a rose gules within a wreath of oak proper.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, featuring a cross divided by four red chevrons. This coat, inspired by the arms of Stafford, was awarded by Humphry, Earl of Stafford, to Robert Whitgrave in the 20th year of Henry VI. Refer to the grant in Camden's Remains, ed. 1657, p. 221. A new addition has recently been made: On a white upper section, a red rose encircled by a natural oak wreath.

Present Representative, George Thomas Whitgreave, Esq.

Present Representative, George Thomas Whitgreave, Esq.





Lane of King's Bromley.

arms_page240.jpg

The ancient seat of this family was at Bentley in this county, of which Richard Lane was possessed in the sixth of Henry VI. The Lanes can be traced to Adam de Lone de Hampton, grandfather of Richard de le Lone de Hampton, in the ninth of Edward II. (1315). The three last Lanes of Bentley each lessened the estate, mainly from their devotion to the ill-fated house of Stuart; and the fourth, John Lane, sold Bentley in 1748. This family, even more than the Giffords and Whitgreaves, can lay claim to be remembered for its loyalty to Charles II. after his flight from Worcester. The celebrated Jane Lane was the daughter of the then head of the house, and rode behind the King from Bentley to Bristol. King's Bromley was inherited from the Newtons about the end of the last century.

The old home of this family was at Bentley in this county, which Richard Lane owned during the sixth year of Henry VI's reign. The Lanes can be traced back to Adam de Lone de Hampton, who was the grandfather of Richard de le Lone de Hampton, in the ninth year of Edward II's reign (1315). The last three Lanes of Bentley each reduced the estate, mostly because of their loyalty to the doomed house of Stuart; the fourth, John Lane, sold Bentley in 1748. This family, even more than the Giffords and Whitgreaves, deserves recognition for their loyalty to Charles II after his escape from Worcester. The famous Jane Lane was the daughter of the then head of the family and rode behind the King from Bentley to Bristol. King's Bromley was inherited from the Newtons around the end of the last century.

See Erdeswick, pp. 235, 410; Shaw's Staffordshire, vol. ii. p. 97; Gent. Mag. for 1822, vol. i. pp. 194, 415, 482.

See Erdeswick, pp. 235, 410; Shaw's Staffordshire, vol. ii. p. 97; Gent. Mag. for 1822, vol. i. pp. 194, 415, 482.

Arms.—Per fesse or and azure, a chevron gules between three mullets counter-changed, on a canton of the third the Royal lions of England, being an augmentation granted by Charles II.

Coat of Arms.—Divided horizontally, gold and blue, with a red chevron between three stars in alternating colors, and in the upper corner, the Royal lions of England on a blue background, which is an addition granted by Charles II.

Present Representative, John Newton Lane, Esq.

Present Representative, John Newton Lane, Esq.





SUFFOLK.

Knightly.

Barnardiston of the Ryes.

arms_page241.jpg

A very remote but the only remaining branch of what was in former ages the most important family in Suffolk, descended from Geoffry de Barnardiston, of Barnardiston in this county, who was living in the reign of Edward I., and who by his marriage with the daughter and coheir of Newmarch became possessed of the adjoining manor of Kedington or Ketton, which continued the seat and residence of the Barnardistons, created Baronet in 1663, until the death of Sir John the sixth Baronet of Ketton, in 1745. The present family descended from Thomas Barnardiston, a merchant in London, who died in 1681, fifth son of Sir Thomas of Ketton, Knight, and Mary, daughter of Sir Richard Knightley. Besides the elder and principal line of Ketton, other branches were of Brightwell in this county, (created Baronets in 1663, extinct in 1721,) and of Northill, co. Bedford, extinct in 1778.

A very remote but the only remaining branch of what used to be the most important family in Suffolk comes from Geoffry de Barnardiston of Barnardiston in this county, who lived during the reign of Edward I. He acquired the nearby manor of Kedington (or Ketton) through his marriage to the daughter and coheir of Newmarch. This manor remained the seat and residence of the Barnardistons, who were made Baronet in 1663, until the death of Sir John, the sixth Baronet of Ketton, in 1745. The current family descends from Thomas Barnardiston, a merchant in London who died in 1681 and was the fifth son of Sir Thomas of Ketton, Knight, and Mary, the daughter of Sir Richard Knightley. In addition to the main line of Ketton, there were other branches based in Brightwell in this county (created Baronet in 1663, extinct in 1721) and Northill, Bedfordshire, which became extinct in 1778.

See Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 396; and Davy's Suffolk Collections in the British Museum, Add. MSS. 19,116, p. 537, for long and interesting accounts of this remarkable family.

See Wotton's Baronetage, iii. 396; and Davy's Suffolk Collections in the British Museum, Add. MSS. 19,116, p. 537, for detailed and fascinating accounts of this remarkable family.

Arms.—Azure, a fess dancettée ermine between six cross-crosslets argent.

Arms.—Blue, with a zigzag band of ermine surrounded by six silver crosslets.

Present Representative, Nathaniel Clarke Barnardiston. Esq.

Present Representative, Nathaniel Clarke Barnardiston, Esq.





Jenney of Bredfield.

arms_page242.jpg

This ancient family is supposed to be of French extraction, and the name to be derived from Guisnes near Calais. The first in the pedigree is Edmund Jenny, of Knoddishall, in this county; grandfather of John Jenney, of the same place, who died in 1460; who was father of Sir William, one of the Judges of the King's Bench in 1477. Edmund, second son of Sir Robert Jenney, of Knoddishall, who died in 1660, married Dorothy, daughter and coheiress of Robert Marryatt, of Bredfield, from whom the present family descend.

This ancient family is thought to have French roots, with the name coming from Guisnes near Calais. The earliest ancestor in the family tree is Edmund Jenny from Knoddishall in this county; he was the grandfather of John Jenney, also from the same place, who died in 1460. John was the father of Sir William, one of the Judges of the King's Bench in 1477. Edmund, the second son of Sir Robert Jenney of Knoddishall, who passed away in 1660, married Dorothy, the daughter and coheiress of Robert Marryatt from Bredfield, and from them, the current family descends.

See Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 19,137, p. 181.

See Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 19,137, p. 181.

Arms.—Ermine, a bend gules cotised or.

Coat of Arms.—White with a red diagonal stripe outlined in gold.

Present Representative, William Jenney, Esq.

Present Representative, William Jenney, Esq.





Brooke of Ufford.

arms_page243.jpg

Sir Thomas Brooke, Knight, Lord Cobham in right of his wife, Joan, daughter and heir of Sir Reginald Braybrooke, Knight, was sixth in descent from William de la Brooke, owner of the manor of Brooke, in the county of Somerset, who died in the fifteenth of Henry III. (1231). Sir Thomas Brooke died in the seventeenth of Henry VI. From his eldest son descended the Barons Cobham; from Reginald the second son sprung the present family. He was seated at Aspel, in Suffolk, and here his descendants continued for nine generations. Ufford came from the heiress of Thomson in 1761.

Sir Thomas Brooke, Knight, Lord Cobham through his wife, Joan, who was the daughter and heir of Sir Reginald Braybrooke, Knight, was the sixth generation from William de la Brooke, who owned the manor of Brooke in Somerset and died in the 15th year of Henry III (1231). Sir Thomas Brooke passed away in the 17th year of Henry VI. His eldest son became the ancestor of the Barons Cobham, and Reginald, the second son, is the ancestor of the current family. He lived in Aspel, Suffolk, where his descendants thrived for nine generations. Ufford came from the heiress of Thomson in 1761.

See Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 19,120, vol. xliv.; and Gent. Mag. for March 1841, p. 306, for an account of the restoration of the Brooke monuments at Cobham.

See Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 19,120, vol. xliv.; and Gent. Mag. for March 1841, p. 306, for a report on the restoration of the Brooke monuments at Cobham.

Arms.—Gules, on a chervon argent a lion rampant sable.

Coat of Arms.—Red background, with a silver chevron featuring a black lion standing upright.

Present Representative, Francis Capper Brooke, Esq.

Present Representative, Francis Capper Brooke, Esq.





Hervey of Ickworth, Marquess of Bristol 1826; Earl 1714; Baron 1703.

arms_page244.jpg

Descended from Thomas Hervey, who died before 1470, having married Jane, daughter and sole heir of Henry Drury, of Ickworth. There is some uncertainty as to who this Thomas Hervey was; the peerages indeed assume that he was younger brother of Sir George Hervey, of Thurleigh, in Bedfordshire; Mr. Gages however has proved that this could not have been the case, but the Rev. Lord Arthur Hervey in his interesting Memoir on Ickworth and the Hervey family, has adduced several reasons by which it would seem that Thomas Hervey was a younger son of John Hervey, senior, of Thurleigh, and the coheiress of Niernuyt, and uncle of Sir George, the last of the legitimate elder line of that knightly family.

Descended from Thomas Hervey, who died before 1470, after marrying Jane, the daughter and only heir of Henry Drury of Ickworth. There’s some uncertainty about who this Thomas Hervey was; peerage records generally assume he was the younger brother of Sir George Hervey of Thurleigh in Bedfordshire. However, Mr. Gages has demonstrated that this could not be true. The Rev. Lord Arthur Hervey, in his insightful memoir on Ickworth and the Hervey family, has provided several reasons suggesting that Thomas Hervey was a younger son of John Hervey, senior of Thurleigh, and the coheiress of Niernuyt, making him the uncle of Sir George, the last legitimate heir of that knightly family.

Younger Branch. Bathurst Hervey, of Clarendon, Wiltshire, Baronet 1818, descended from the eighth son of the first Earl of Bristol.

Younger Branch. Bathurst Hervey, of Clarendon, Wiltshire, Baronet 1818, is a descendant of the eighth son of the first Earl of Bristol.

See Gage's Thingoe, p. 286; Brydges's Collins, iv. p. 139; Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 19,135, vol. lix. p. 160; the Rev. Lord Arthur Hervey's papers on Ickworth and the Family of Hervey, 4to. Lowestoft, 1858; and Proceedings of the Suffolk Archaeological Society, vol. ii. No. 7.

See Gage's Thingoe, p. 286; Brydges's Collins, iv.

Arms.—Gules, on a bend argent three trefoils slipped vert, and so borne by John Hervey, Esq., as appears by "The Proceedings in the Grey and Hastings Controversy" in the Court of Chivalry in the year 1407. See the Proceedings, privately printed by Lord Hastings in 1841, p. 27. The arms of Hervey appear to have been founded on the coat of Foliot, Gules, a bend argent.

Coat of Arms. — Red, with a silver diagonal stripe featuring three green trefoils, as used by John Hervey, Esq., noted in "The Proceedings in the Grey and Hastings Controversy" in the Court of Chivalry in 1407. For more details, see the Proceedings, privately published by Lord Hastings in 1841, p. 27. The Hervey arms appear to be influenced by the coat of Foliot, Red, with a silver diagonal stripe.

Present Representative, Frederick William John Hervey, 3rd Marquess of Bristol.

Present Representative, Frederick William John Hervey, 3rd Marquess of Bristol.





Gentle.

Rous of Dennington and Henham, Earl of Stradbroke 1821; Baron 1796; Baronet 1660.

arms_page245.jpg

"All the Roucis that be in Southfolk cum oute of the house of Rouse of Dennington," writes Leland in his Itinerary, vol. vi. fol. 13. That estate appears to have come into the family by the marriage of Peter Rouse with an heiress of Hobart in the reign of Edward III., and to have been increased afterwards by matches with the heiress of le-Watre and Phillips, the last representing one of the co-heiresses of Erpingham. Henham, the present residence, was purchased in 1545 by Sir Anthony Rous, son of Sir William Rous of Dennington.

"All the Roucis in Southfolk come from the house of Rouse of Dennington," writes Leland in his Itinerary, vol. vi. fol. 13. That estate seems to have entered the family through the marriage of Peter Rouse with an heiress of Hobart during the reign of Edward III., and it was later expanded through marriages with the heiress of le-Watre and Phillips, the last of whom represented one of the co-heiresses of Erpingham. Henham, the current residence, was bought in 1545 by Sir Anthony Rous, son of Sir William Rous of Dennington.

See Wotton's Baronetage, iii. p. 159; Brydges's Collins, viii. p. 476; Suckling's History and Antiquities of Suffolk, vol. ii. p. 365; and Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 19,147, vol. lxxi. p. 192.

See Wotton's Baronetage, iii. p. 159; Brydges's Collins, viii. p. 476; Suckling's History and Antiquities of Suffolk, vol. ii. p. 365; and Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 19,147, vol. lxxi. p. 192.

Arms.—Sable, a fess dancettée or between three crescents argent.

Arms.—Black, with a zigzag gold band between three silver crescents.

Present Representative, John Edward Cornwallis Rous, 2nd Earl of Stradbroke.

Present Representative, John Edward Cornwallis Rous, 2nd Earl of Stradbroke.





Heigham of Hunston.

arms_page246.jpg

A younger branch of an old Suffolk family, who derived their name from a hamlet in the parish of Gaseley in this county. The pedigree is traced to Richard Heigham, who died in 1340; his grandson Thomas was of Heigham, and died in 1409. The elder line ended in co-heiresses in 1558. A younger branch was seated at Barrow, and continued there till 1714, founded by Clement, fourth son of Thomas Heigham, of Heigham, Esq., who died in 1492. From Sir Clement, third in descent from the first Clement, the present family is descended. Hunston was inherited from the heiress of Lurkin in 1701.

A younger branch of an old Suffolk family, who got their name from a small village in the Gaseley parish in this county. The family tree goes back to Richard Heigham, who died in 1340; his grandson Thomas was from Heigham and died in 1409. The older line ended with co-heiresses in 1558. A younger branch was established at Barrow and remained there until 1714, founded by Clement, the fourth son of Thomas Heigham of Heigham, Esq., who died in 1492. The current family descends from Sir Clement, who is the third in line from the first Clement. Hunston was inherited from the heiress of Lurkin in 1701.

See Gage's History of the Hundred of Thingoe, p. 8; and Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 19,135, vol. lix. p. 50.

See Gage's History of the Hundred of Thingoe, p. 8; and Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 19,135, vol. lix. p. 50.

Arms.—Sable, a fess cheeky, or and azure, between three horse's heads erased argent.

Coat of Arms.—Black background with a stripe featuring alternating gold and blue patterns, flanked by three silver horse heads cut off at the neck.

Present Representative, John Henry Heigham, Esq.

Present Representative, John Henry Heigham, Esq.





Blois of Cockfield Hall, Baronet 1686.

arms_page247.jpg

This family is supposed to derive its name from Blois in France, and is thought to be of great antiquity in this county; it is not regularly deduced, however, beyond Thomas Blois, who was living at Norton in Suffolk in 1470. Third in descent was Richard Blois of Grundisburgh, which he purchased, and which became for many years the principal seat of the family. He died in 1557.

This family is believed to get its name from Blois in France and is thought to have a long history in this county. However, the lineage isn't clearly traced back further than Thomas Blois, who was living in Norton, Suffolk, in 1470. The third in descent was Richard Blois of Grundisburgh, which he bought, and it became the family's main residence for many years. He passed away in 1557.

See Wotton's Baronetage, iv. p. 9; and Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 91,118, vol. xlii. p. 386.

See Wotton's Baronetage, iv. p. 9; and Davy's Suffolk Collections, Add. MSS. 91,118, vol. xlii. p. 386.

Arms.—Gules, a bend vair between two fleurs-de-lis argent. Gwillim makes the field sable, and the fleurs-de-lis or.

Coat of Arms.—Red, featuring a silver diagonal band with a design of blue and white fur between two silver fleurs-de-lis. Gwillim mentions that the background is black, and the fleurs-de-lis are gold.

Present Representative, Sir John Ralph Blois, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Ralph Blois, 8th Baronet.





SURREY.

Knightly.

Bray of Shere.

arms_page248.jpg

The first in the pedigree is Sir Robert Bray, of Northamptonshire, father of Sir James, who lived about the period of Richard I. His great-grandson, Thomas, was lord of Thurnby, in the same county, in the ninth of Edward II. (1316); from him descended Sir Edward Bray, who died in 1558. Harleston, also in the county of Northampton, was an ancient seat of the Bray family, which rose into opulence with the success of Henry VII. after the Battle of Bosworth, where Sir Reginald Bray, the devoted adherent of the King, was said to have discovered the crown in a thorn-bush, in memory of which he afterwards bore for his badge, "a thorn with a crown in the middle of it." Shere was granted, with many other manors, to Sir Reginald as a reward for his services. The present family spring from Reginald, eldest son by the first wife of Sir Edward Bray, son of John, and nephew of the celebrated Sir Reginald. Edmund Lord Bray was elder brother of Sir Edward; he had an only son, John Lord Bray, who died s. p. in 1557.

The first in the family tree is Sir Robert Bray from Northamptonshire, father of Sir James, who lived around the time of Richard I. His great-grandson, Thomas, was lord of Thurnby in the same county during the ninth year of Edward II (1316); from him came Sir Edward Bray, who passed away in 1558. Harleston, also in Northamptonshire, was an old residence of the Bray family, which gained wealth with the success of Henry VII after the Battle of Bosworth. Sir Reginald Bray, a loyal supporter of the King, was said to have found the crown in a thorn bush, and as a reminder of this, he later adopted a badge featuring "a thorn with a crown in the middle." Shere, along with several other manors, was granted to Sir Reginald as a reward for his services. The current family descends from Reginald, the eldest son by the first wife of Sir Edward Bray, son of John and nephew of the famous Sir Reginald. Edmund Lord Bray was the older brother of Sir Edward; he had one son, John Lord Bray, who died without heirs in 1557.

Of this family was William Bray, Esq., Treasurer of the Society of Antiquaries, and joint Historian of Surrey.

Of this family was William Bray, Esq., Treasurer of the Society of Antiquaries, and co-Historian of Surrey.

See Leland's Itinerary, viii. 113, a; and Manning and Bray's Surrey, vol. i. p. 514-523.

See Leland's Itinerary, viii. 113, a; and Manning and Bray's Surrey, vol. i. p. 514-523.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three eagle's legs sable erased a la cuisse, their talons gules. Another coat usually quartered with the above is, Vair, three bends gules.

Coat of Arms.—Silver with a chevron between three black eagle legs severed at the thigh, their talons red. Another coat that is frequently combined with the one above is Vair, featuring three red diagonal stripes.

Present Representative, Edward Bray, Esq.

Presenting Representative, Edward Bray, Esq.





Perceval of Nork House, Earl of Egmont in Ireland 1733; Baron Lovell and Holland 1762; Baron Arden 1802.

arms_page249.jpg

"The House of Yvery," a work privately printed by the second Earl of Egmont in 1742, professes to give the history of this family, but the earlier descents cannot with certainty be relied on, and even the extraction of Richard Perceval, the modern founder of the present family in the time of James I., from the Somersetshire Percevals, is according to Brydges, in his Biographical Peerage, not without some doubts. It appears, however, certain that he was the son of George Perceval, of Tykenham, in the county of Somerset, by Elizabeth Bampfylde, and fifth in descent from Richard Perceval, of Weston-Gordein, in the same county, who died between 1433 and 1439, the representative of a family who had been seated there from the reign of Richard I., and who claim to be descended from the House of Yvery in Normandy. The elder branch of the Percevals continued at their manor of Weston until the extinction of the male line in the person of Thomas Perceval, Esq. in 1691. The younger branch, the ancestors of the present family, were seated in the county of Cork in Ireland, and in the eighteenth century at Enmore in Somersetshire, sold after the death of the fifth Earl of Egmont. Nork House was the seat of Lord Arden, father of the present Earl, and brother of the third Earl of Egmont.

"The House of Yvery," a work privately printed by the second Earl of Egmont in 1742, claims to provide the history of this family, but the earlier ancestry cannot be relied upon with certainty, and even Richard Perceval, the modern founder of the current family during the time of James I, is linked to the Somersetshire Percevals with some doubts, according to Brydges in his Biographical Peerage. However, it is clear that he was the son of George Perceval of Tykenham in Somerset, by Elizabeth Bampfylde, and the fifth in descent from Richard Perceval of Weston-Gordein in the same county, who died between 1433 and 1439. He represented a family that had lived there since the reign of Richard I and claims descent from the House of Yvery in Normandy. The elder branch of the Percevals remained at their manor of Weston until the male line ended with Thomas Perceval, Esq. in 1691. The younger branch, ancestors of the current family, settled in county Cork in Ireland and, in the eighteenth century, at Enmore in Somersetshire, which was sold after the death of the fifth Earl of Egmont. Nork House was the residence of Lord Arden, father of the current Earl and brother of the third Earl of Egmont.

See "A Genealogical History of the House of Yvery, &c." 8vo. 1742; and Collinson's History of Somersetshire, vol. iii. p. 171.

See "A Genealogical History of the House of Yvery, &c." 8vo. 1742; and Collinson's History of Somersetshire, vol. iii. p. 171.

Arms.—Argent, on a chief indented gules three crosses patée of the first. This coat appears to have been borne by Sir Roger Perceval in the reign of Edward I. See his seal engraved in "The House of Yvery," vol. i. p. 41.

Arms.—Silver, with a jagged red chief featuring three crosses in silver. This coat appears to have been used by Sir Roger Perceval during the reign of Edward I. Refer to his seal in "The House of Yvery," vol. i, p. 41.

Present Representative, George James Perceval, sixth Earl of Egmont.

Present Representative, George James Perceval, the sixth Earl of Egmont.





Gentle.

Weston of West-Horsley.

arms_page250.jpg

Adam de Weston, living in 1205, was the ancestor of this family, which has been from a very early period connected with Surrey. In the reign of Edward II., the Westons were of West-Clandon, and also of Weston in Albury, and of Send and Ockham, in this county. The last was sold in the latter part of the seventeenth century, and West-Horsley inherited by the will of William Nicholas, Esq. in 1749.

Adam de Weston, who lived in 1205, was the ancestor of this family, which has been connected to Surrey for a long time. During the reign of Edward II, the Westons were from West-Clandon, as well as from Weston in Albury, and from Send and Ockham in this county. The last property was sold in the late seventeenth century, and West-Horsley was inherited by the will of William Nicholas, Esq. in 1749.

See Manning and Bray's Surrey, vol. iii. p. 41; and Gent. Mag. for 1789, p. 223; for a notice of this family, as well as of the extinct family of the same name, of Sutton, in this county, see also Gent. Mag. for 1800, p. 606.

See Manning and Bray's Surrey, vol. iii. p. 41; and Gent. Mag. for 1789, p. 223; for a mention of this family, as well as the extinct family of the same name from Sutton, in this county. Also, see Gent. Mag. for 1800, p. 606.

Arms.—Sable, a chevron or between three leopard's heads erased argent, crowned or.

Coat of Arms.—Black background, with a gold chevron between three silver leopard heads without bodies, each crowned in gold.

Present Representative, Henry Weston, Esq.

Presenting Rep, Henry Weston, Esq.





Onslow of West-Clandon, Earl of Onslow 1801; Baron 1716; Baronet 1660.

arms_page251.jpg

Although the foundation of the consequence of this family was laid by Richard Onslow, a celebrated lawyer of the reign of Elizabeth, yet he was sprung from an old gentle family seated at Onslow in Shropshire, as far back as the time of Richard I., and probably much earlier. The first recorded ancestor is John de Ondeslowe, whose grandson, Warin, was father of "Roger de Ondeslow juxta Shrewsbury," whose son Thomas was living in the twelfth of Edward II. 1318. Richard Onslow became Speaker of the House of Commons, and died in 1571. He was the first of his family connected with Surrey, by his marriage with Catherine, daughter and heir of Richard Harding, of Knoll, in this county, in the year 1554. West-Clandon was purchased in 1641 by Sir Richard Onslow, created a Baronet in 1660; the ancient family estate of Onslow having been sold by Edward Onslow in 1617.

Although the foundation of this family's legacy was established by Richard Onslow, a renowned lawyer during Elizabeth's reign, he descended from an old gentry family based in Onslow, Shropshire, dating back to the time of Richard I, and likely even earlier. The first recorded ancestor is John de Ondeslowe, whose grandson Warin was the father of "Roger de Ondeslow juxta Shrewsbury," whose son Thomas was alive in the twelfth year of Edward II, 1318. Richard Onslow became Speaker of the House of Commons and died in 1571. He was the first in his family to connect with Surrey, through his marriage to Catherine, the daughter and heir of Richard Harding of Knoll in this county, in 1554. West-Clandon was bought in 1641 by Sir Richard Onslow, who was made a Baronet in 1660; the ancient family estate of Onslow had been sold by Edward Onslow in 1617.

Younger Branches. Onslow of Altham in the county of Lancaster, Baronet 1797, descended from the next brother of the Right Hon. Arthur Onslow, Speaker of the House of Commons from 1726 to 1761. Onslow of Staughton, in the county of Huntingdon, descended from the second son of Sir Richard Onslow, the first Baronet.

Younger Branches. Onslow of Altham in Lancashire, Baronet 1797, is descended from the next brother of the Right Hon. Arthur Onslow, who was Speaker of the House of Commons from 1726 to 1761. Onslow of Staughton, in Huntingdonshire, is descended from the second son of Sir Richard Onslow, the first Baronet.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. v. p. 461; Manning and Bray's Surrey, vol. ii. p. 723; and Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, p. 90, corrected by the MSS. of Mr. Joseph Morris.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. v. p. 461; Manning and Bray's Surrey, vol. ii. p. 723; and Blakeway's Sheriffs of Shropshire, p. 90, updated by the manuscripts of Mr. Joseph Morris.

Arms.—Argent, a fess gules between six Cornish choughs proper.

Arms.—Silver background with a red band featuring six Cornish choughs in their natural colors.

Present Representative, Arthur George Onslow, third Earl of Onslow.

Present Representative, Arthur George Onslow, third Earl of Onslow.





SUSSEX.

Knightly.

Ashburnham of Ashburnham, Earl of Ashburnham 1730; Baron 1689.

arms_page253.jpg

"A family of stupendous antiquity," writes Fuller. "The most ancient family in these tracts," according to Camden. "Genealogists have given them a Saxon origin," says Brydges; "but that is a fact very difficult to be proved, though very commonly asserted. They do not, I believe, appear in Domesday Book." There can be no doubt, however, that the Ashburnhams have been seated at Ashburnham from the reign of Henry II., and probably from a much earlier period, and are descended from Bertram, Constable of Dover in the reign of William the Conqueror. By the improvidence of Sir John Ashburnham, who died in 1620, this ancient patrimony was lost for a time, but recovered by Frances Holland, the wife of his eldest son John (the groom of the bed-chamber to Charles I.), who sold her whole estate, and laid out the money in redeeming Ashburnham.

"A family of incredible antiquity," writes Fuller. "The oldest family in these areas," according to Camden. "Genealogists have traced their roots to a Saxon origin," says Brydges; "but that’s a claim that’s very hard to prove, despite being widely accepted. They don’t, I believe, appear in the Domesday Book." However, it's clear that the Ashburnhams have been established at Ashburnham since the reign of Henry II, and likely even earlier, and are descended from Bertram, Constable of Dover during the reign of William the Conqueror. Due to the careless actions of Sir John Ashburnham, who died in 1620, this ancient estate was lost for a time, but was regained by Frances Holland, the wife of his eldest son John (the bedchamber groom to Charles I), who sold her entire estate and used the money to redeem Ashburnham.

Younger Branch. Ashburnham of Bromham in this county, Baronet 1661, descended from Richard, second son of Thomas Ashburnham, living in the reign of Henry VI.

Younger Branch. Ashburnham of Bromham in this county, Baronet 1661, descended from Richard, the second son of Thomas Ashburnham, who lived during the reign of Henry VI.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 249; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 283.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 249; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 283.

Arms.—Gules, a fess between six mullets argent. The earliest seal remaining of any of the ancestors of this family is, I believe, that of "Stephen de Esburne," great-grandson of Bertram, the Constable of Dover: the device is a slip or branch of Ash. His grandson, "Richard de Hasburnan," bore the Maltravers fret, his mother being daughter of Sir John Maltravers: the present coat was borne by Sir John de Aschebornham, in the reign of Edward II. (Seals and Roll of the reign of Edward II.)

Arms.—Red, with a horizontal band and six silver stars. The oldest seal that still exists from any of this family's ancestors is, I believe, that of "Stephen de Esburne," the great-grandson of Bertram, the Constable of Dover: the emblem shows a slip or branch of ash. His grandson, "Richard de Hasburnan," had the Maltravers design because his mother was the daughter of Sir John Maltravers: the current coat was used by Sir John de Aschebornham during the reign of Edward II. (Seals and Roll of the reign of Edward II.)

Present Representative, Bertram Ashburnham, 4th Earl of Ashburnham.

Present Representative, Bertram Ashburnham, 4th Earl of Ashburnham.





Goring of Highden, Baronet 1627.

arms_page254.jpg

The name is derived from Goring, in the rape of Arundel, where the family can be traced to John de Goring, living in the reign of Edward II. Burton, in this county, was the seat of the principal and elder line of the family, created Baronets in 1662, extinct in 1723. Of a younger branch was the celebrated George Lord Goring 1628, Earl of Norwich 1644, (which titles were extinct on the death of his third son, but heir, the second Lord, in 1670,) sprung from the second son of Sir William Gorynge, of Burton, who died in 1553.

The name comes from Goring, in the district of Arundel, where the family can be traced back to John de Goring, who lived during the reign of Edward II. Burton, in this county, was the home of the main and older branch of the family, which was made Baronet in 1662 and became extinct in 1723. A younger branch produced the famous George Lord Goring in 1628, who became Earl of Norwich in 1644 (these titles ended with the death of his third son, but the second Lord's heir was in 1670), and he was descended from the second son of Sir William Gorynge of Burton, who died in 1553.

The present family is descended from the second son of Sir Henry Goring, of Burton, Knight, who died in 1594. Highden was purchased in 1647.

The current family comes from the second son of Sir Henry Goring of Burton, a knight, who died in 1594. Highden was bought in 1647.

Younger Branch. Goring of Wiston, Sussex, descended from the second marriage of Sir Charles Matthew Goring, of Highden, the fourth Baronet, and the co-heiress of Fagg.

Younger Branch. Goring of Wiston, Sussex, is a descendant of Sir Charles Matthew Goring of Highden, the fourth Baronet, and the co-heiress of Fagg from his second marriage.

See Dallaway's Rape of Arundel, p. 281, who refers to Evidences relating to the family of Goring, MSS. Coll. Arm. Philpot, F. 119; Leland's Itin., vol. vi. fol. 17; Cartwright's Rape of Bramber, p. 132; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. ii. p. 71.

See Dallaway's Rape of Arundel, p. 281, who refers to records related to the Goring family, MSS. Coll. Arm. Philpot, F. 119; Leland's Itin., vol. vi. fol. 17; Cartwright's Rape of Bramber, p. 132; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. ii. p. 71.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three annulets gules.

Arms.—Silver background, with a chevron and three red rings.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Goring, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Goring, 8th Baronet.





Pelham of Laughton, Earl of Chichester 1801; Baron 1672; Baronet 1611.

arms_page255.jpg

The name is local, from Pelham, in Hertfordshire, the seat of the ancestors of this family in the time of Edward I., and probably even before the Conquest. In the 28th of Edward I., Walter de Pelham had a confirmation grant of lands in Heilsham, Horsey, &c. in this county. From the reign of Edward III. the Pelhams have been a most important Sussex family; it was in that reign that Sir John Pelham assumed the Buckle as his badge, in token of his claim to the honour of taking John King of France prisoner at the battle of Poictiers. Laughton belonged to the Pelhams before 1403, but has been long deserted as the residence of the family.

The name is local, from Pelham in Hertfordshire, the ancestral home of this family during the time of Edward I and probably even before the Conquest. In the 28th year of Edward I's reign, Walter de Pelham received a confirmation grant of lands in Heilsham, Horsey, etc., in this county. Since the reign of Edward III, the Pelhams have been a significant family in Sussex; it was during that reign that Sir John Pelham adopted the Buckle as his symbol, as a sign of his claim to the honor of capturing John, King of France, at the Battle of Poitiers. Laughton was owned by the Pelhams before 1403, but has long been abandoned as the family's residence.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. v. p. 488; Horsfield's Lewes; and Sussex Archaeological Collections, vol. iii. p. 211, for a curious paper on the arms and badges of the Pelhams.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. v. p. 488; Horsfield's Lewes; and Sussex Archaeological Collections, vol. iii. p. 211, for an interesting article on the coats of arms and insignia of the Pelhams.

Arms.—Quarterly, 1 and 4, Azure, three pelicans argent, vulning themselves proper; 2 and 3, Gules, two belts in pale argent with buckles and studs or.

Arms.—Divided into four sections, the first and fourth sections are blue with three silver pelicans harming themselves; the second and third sections are red with two silver belts arranged vertically, each featuring gold buckles and studs.

Present Representative, Henry Thomas Pelham, 3rd Earl of Chichester.

Present Representative, Henry Thomas Pelham, 3rd Earl of Chichester.





Shelley of Maresfield, Baronet 1611.

arms_page256.jpg

Although there is no doubt of the antiquity of the house of Shelley, the accounts of the earlier descents of the family are very scanty. Originally of the county of Huntingdon, the Shelleys are said to have removed into this county at a very early period. But the earliest mention we have in history of any of this family is of John and Thomas Shelley, who, following the fortunes of Richard II., were attainted and beheaded in the first year of Henry IV. The remaining brother, Sir William Shelley, not being connected with the followers of Richard II., retained his possessions, and was the ancestor of this family, who in the reign of Henry VI., by a match with the heiress of Michelgrove, of Michelgrove, in Clapham, was seated at that place, which continued the residence of the Shelleys until the year 1800, when it was sold, and Maresfield became the family seat.

Although the Shelley family's history is quite old, the records of their earlier generations are limited. Originally from Huntingdon County, the Shelleys are said to have moved to this county a long time ago. However, the earliest historical mention of this family refers to John and Thomas Shelley, who were executed in the first year of Henry IV for supporting Richard II. The surviving brother, Sir William Shelley, wasn't linked to Richard II's supporters, so he kept his land and became the ancestor of this family. During Henry VI's reign, through a marriage with the heiress of Michelgrove in Clapham, they established themselves at that location, which remained the Shelley home until 1800 when it was sold, and Maresfield became the family estate.

Younger Branches. Shelley or Castle-Goring, Baronet 1806, descended from the fourth son of Sir John Shelley, of Michelgrove, who died in 1526. Shelley of Avington, in the county of Southampton, and Shelley (called Sidney Foulis) Lord de L'Isle and Dudley 1835, descended from the second marriage of Sir Bysshe Shelley, of Castle-Goring, Baronet, and the heiress of Perry, of Penshurst.,

Younger Branches. Shelley or Castle-Goring, Baronet 1806, descended from the fourth son of Sir John Shelley, of Michelgrove, who died in 1526. Shelley of Avington, in the county of Southampton, and Shelley (known as Sidney Foulis) Lord de L'Isle and Dudley 1835, descended from the second marriage of Sir Bysshe Shelley, of Castle-Goring, Baronet, and the heiress of Perry, of Penshurst.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 39; Cartwright's Topography of the Rape of Bramber, p. 76; and Dallaway's Rape of Arundel, p. 40.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 39; Cartwright's Topography of the Rape of Bramber, p. 76; and Dallaway's Rape of Arundel, p. 40.

Arms.—Sable, a fess engrailed between three whelk-shells or.

Arms.—Black with a wavy band between three gold whelk shells.

Present Representative, Sir John Villiers Shelley, 7th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Villiers Shelley, 7th Baronet.





West of Buckhurst, Earl de la Warr 1761; Baron 1427.

arms_page257.jpg

The Wests are remarkable, not so much for the antiquity of the family as for the early period at which they attained the honour of the peerage. Sir Thomas West is the first recorded ancestor; he died in the seventeenth of Edward II., having married the heiress of Cantilupe, and thus became possessed of lands in Devonshire, and at Snitterfield in Warwickshire. His grandson, Thomas, married the heiress of De la Warr, and thus became connected with Sussex. But the principal property of the Wests in this county was granted to Thomas West, afterwards Lord la Warr, in the first year of Henry VII. Few families indeed had broader lands; among which may be mentioned, Offington, in the parish of Broadwater, derived from the heiress of Peverel at the end of the fourteenth century; and Halnaker, in the parish of Boxgrove, both in Sussex; and Wherwell, in Hampshire; all now alienated. Buckhurst came to the present Lord by his marriage with the coheiress of Sackville.

The Wests are notable, not so much for the age of the family but for how early they achieved the honor of a peerage. Sir Thomas West is the first recorded ancestor; he died in the seventeenth year of Edward II, having married the heiress of Cantilupe and thus acquired lands in Devonshire and at Snitterfield in Warwickshire. His grandson, Thomas, married the heiress of De la Warr, connecting the family with Sussex. However, the main property of the Wests in this county was granted to Thomas West, who later became Lord la Warr, in the first year of Henry VII. Few families had more extensive lands; for instance, Offington, in the parish of Broadwater, was acquired from the heiress of Peverel at the end of the fourteenth century. Halnaker, in the parish of Boxgrove, both in Sussex, and Wherwell in Hampshire, have all since been sold off. Buckhurst came to the current Lord through his marriage to the coheiress of Sackville.

Younger Branch. West of Ruthyn Castle, Denbighshire, descended from the younger son of John, second Earl De la Warr.

Younger Branch. To the west of Ruthyn Castle, Denbighshire, descended from the younger son of John, the second Earl De la Warr.

The Wests of Alscot, in the county of Gloucester, claim to be descended from Leonard, the younger son of Sir Thomas West, Lord De la Warr, K.G., who died in the year 1525, although there is nothing but "family tradition," as is evident by the memorial to the Earl Marshal of Mr. James West, of Alscot, dated December 12, 1768, to justify this assumption; a distinct coat, viz. Argent, a fess dancette pean, was granted to Mr. West on this occasion.

The Wests of Alscot, in Gloucestershire, claim to be descended from Leonard, the younger son of Sir Thomas West, Lord De la Warr, K.G., who passed away in 1525. However, this is based solely on "family tradition," as highlighted by the memorial to Mr. James West of Alscot, dated December 12, 1768, which does not provide solid proof for this claim; a unique coat of arms, namely Argent, a fess dancette pean, was granted to Mr. West on this occasion.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. v. p. i.; Blore's Rutlandshire, p. 100; Cartwright's Rape of Bramber, p. 38; and Dallaway's Rape of Chichester, pp. 129, 133.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. v. p. i.; Blore's Rutlandshire, p. 100; Cartwright's Rape of Bramber, p. 38; and Dallaway's Rape of Chichester, pp. 129, 133.

Arms.—Argent, a fess dancette sable. The badge of the De-la-Warrs was a crampet or shape of a sword; assumed by Roger la-Warr, Lord la-Warr, for having assisted Sir John Pelham in making John King of France prisoner at the Battle of Poictiers. See Sussex Archaeological Collections, vol. iii. p. 211.

Coat of Arms.—Silver with a zigzag black band. The emblem of the De-la-Warr family featured a crampet or sword shape; it was taken up by Roger la-Warr, Lord la-Warr, for assisting Sir John Pelham in capturing John, King of France, at the Battle of Poictiers. Refer to Sussex Archaeological Collections, vol. iii. p. 211.

Present Representative, George John Sackville West, 5th Earl De la Warr.

Present Representative, George John Sackville West, 5th Earl De la Warr.





Gage of Firle; Baron Gage 1790; Viscount Gage in Ireland 1720; Baronet 1622.

arms_page259.jpg

John, son of John Gage, living in the ninth of Henry IV., had issue by Joan, heiress of John Sudgrove, of Sudgrove, in Gloucestershire, Sir John Gage; an adherent of the house of York, knighted by Edward IV., and who died in 1475. He married Elianor, second daughter and coheiress of Thomas St.Clere, of Heighton St. Clere, in Sussex, and acquired by this marriage several manors in this county, as well as in Surrey, Kent, Buckinghamshire, and Northamptonshire. The present family, seated at Firle from this period, descend from his eldest son. From his second son sprung the Gages of Raunds, in Northamptonshire, sold in 1675.

John, son of John Gage, living during the ninth year of Henry IV, had children with Joan, the heiress of John Sudgrove from Sudgrove in Gloucestershire. Their son was Sir John Gage, a supporter of the York family, knighted by Edward IV, and who died in 1475. He married Elianor, the second daughter and co-heir of Thomas St. Clere from Heighton St. Clere in Sussex, and through this marriage, he acquired several manors in Sussex, as well as in Surrey, Kent, Buckinghamshire, and Northamptonshire. The current family, based in Firle since that time, descends from his oldest son. From his second son came the Gages of Raunds in Northamptonshire, which were sold in 1675.

Younger Branch. Gage of Hengrave, in Suffolk, Baronet 1622, descended from Edward, third son of Sir John Gage, of Firle, who died in 1633.

Younger Branch. Gage of Hengrave, in Suffolk, Baronet 1622, descended from Edward, the third son of Sir John Gage of Firle, who passed away in 1633.

See Gage's Hengrave, p. 225; Gage's Hundred of Thingoe, p. 204; Bridges's History of Northamptonshire, vol. ii. p. 188; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 503, vol. iii. p. 366; Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 249; and Leland's Itinerary, vol. iv. p. 12.

See Gage's Hengrave, p. 225; Gage's Hundred of Thingoe, p. 204; Bridges's History of Northamptonshire, vol. ii. p. 188; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 503, vol. iii. p. 366; Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 249; and Leland's Itinerary, vol. iv. p. 12.

Arms.—Party per saltier argent and azure, a saltier gules.

Coat of Arms.—Split by a diagonal line, silver and blue, featuring a red diagonal cross.

Present Representative, Henry Hall Gage, 4th Viscount Gage.

Present Representative, Henry Hall Gage, 4th Viscount Gage.





Gentle.

Barttelot of Stopham.

arms_page260.jpg

The head of this family, according to Dallaway, may be considered one of the most ancient proprietors of land residing upon his estate in this county. The first in the pedigree is Adam de Bartelott, said to be of Norman origin, father of John, who married Joan Stopham, coheiress of lands in the manor from whence the name is derived. He died in 1428, and Stopham has ever since remained the inheritance of their descendants.

The head of this family, according to Dallaway, is considered one of the oldest landowners living on his estate in this county. The first in the family tree is Adam de Bartelott, believed to be of Norman descent, father of John, who married Joan Stopham, a co-heiress of lands in the manor that gave the name. He passed away in 1428, and Stopham has remained the inheritance of their descendants ever since.

See the Topographer, vol. iv. p. 346; and Cartwright's edition of Dallaway's Rape of Arundel, p. 347.

See the Topographer, vol. iv. p. 346; and Cartwright's edition of Dallaway's Rape of Arundel, p. 347.

Arms.—Sable, three falconer's sinister gloves pendent argent, tasseled or.

Arms.—Black, with three falconer’s left-hand gloves hanging in silver, trimmed with gold tassels.

Present Representative, George Barttelot, Esq.

Present Representative, George Barttelot, Esq.





Courthope of Wyleigh.

arms_page261.jpg

From the reign of King Edward I., this family has been settled at Wadhurst, Lamberhurst, Ticehurst, and the adjoining parishes on the borders of Sussex and Kent: at Goudhurst, in the latter county, they held the manors of Bockingfield and the Pillery from the year 1413 to 1498, and in 1513 Wyleigh, in the parish of Ticehurst, was acquired by John Courthope in marriage with his wife Elizabeth, daughter of William Saunders of Wyleigh. From this marriage sprung three sons, John, George, and Thomas; the issue male of the eldest has been long extinct; from the second, who had Wyleigh, is descended the present Representative of the family; and from the third and youngest, who succeeded to the estate of "Courthope" in Goudhurst, is descended William Courthope, Esq. Somerset Herald.

Since the reign of King Edward I, this family has been based in Wadhurst, Lamberhurst, Ticehurst, and nearby parishes along the borders of Sussex and Kent. In Goudhurst, located in Kent, they owned the manors of Bockingfield and the Pillery from 1413 to 1498. In 1513, John Courthope acquired Wyleigh in the parish of Ticehurst when he married Elizabeth, the daughter of William Saunders of Wyleigh. Their marriage produced three sons: John, George, and Thomas. The male line of the eldest has long been extinct; the second son, who inherited Wyleigh, is the ancestor of the current representative of the family, and the youngest son, who took over the estate of "Courthope" in Goudhurst, is the ancestor of William Courthope, Esq. Somerset Herald.

See Collectanea Topog. et Genealog., vol. ii. pp. 279, 363; and The Visitation of Sussex, C. 27, in Coll. Arm.

See Collectanea Topog. et Genealog., vol. ii. pp. 279, 363; and The Visitation of Sussex, C. 27, in Coll. Arm.

Arms.—Argent, a fess azure between three estoiles sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver field with a blue band between three black stars.

Present Representative, George Campion Courthope, Esq.

Present Representative, George Campion Courthope, Esq.





WARWICKSHIRE.

Knightly.

Shirley of Eatington (elder branch of Staunton-Harold, in the County of Leicester, Earl Ferrers 1711, Baron Ferrers of Chartley 1677, Baronet 1611.)

arms_page262.jpg

Sasuualo, or Sewallis, whose name, says Dugdale, "argues him to be of the old English stock," mentioned in Domesday as mesne Lord of Eatington, under Henry de Ferrers, is the first recorded ancestor of this, the oldest knightly family in the county of Warwick. Until the reign of Edward III., Eatington appears to have continued the principal seat of the Shirleys, whose name was assumed in the twelfth century from the manor of Shirley, in Derbyshire, and which, with Ratcliffe-on-Sore, in the county of Nottingham, and Rakedale and Staunton-Harold, in Leicestershire, derived from the heiresses of Basset and Staunton, succeeded, during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, as the usual residence of the chiefs of the house. In the sixteenth century, Astwell, in Northamptonshire, was brought into the family by the heiress of Lovett; and in 1615, by the marriage of Sir Henry Shirley with the coheiress of Devereux, a moiety of the possessions of the Earls of Essex, after the extinction of that title in 1646, centred in Sir Robert Shirley, father of the first Earl Ferrers; on whose death, in 1717, the family estates were divided, the Derbyshire, Leicestershire, and Staffordshire estates descending with the earldom to the issue of his first marriage, and the Warwickshire property, the original seat of the Shirleys, eventually to the great-grandfather of the present possessor, the eldest surviving son of the second marriage of the first Earl Ferrers.

Sasuualo, or Sewallis, whose name, according to Dugdale, "suggests he comes from old English heritage," is mentioned in the Domesday Book as the middle Lord of Eatington under Henry de Ferrers. He is the first recorded ancestor of this, the oldest knightly family in Warwickshire. Until the reign of Edward III, Eatington seems to have remained the main seat of the Shirleys, who took their name in the twelfth century from the manor of Shirley in Derbyshire. Along with Ratcliffe-on-Sore in Nottinghamshire, and Rakedale and Staunton-Harold in Leicestershire, it was inherited from the heiresses of Basset and Staunton. Throughout the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, these places were usually the home of the heads of the family. In the sixteenth century, Astwell in Northamptonshire came into the family through the heiress of Lovett; and in 1615, when Sir Henry Shirley married the coheiress of Devereux, he acquired part of the estates of the Earls of Essex. After that title became extinct in 1646, those estates passed to Sir Robert Shirley, father of the first Earl Ferrers. When he died in 1717, the family estates were divided, with the properties in Derbyshire, Leicestershire, and Staffordshire passing to the descendants of his first marriage, and the Warwickshire property, the original seat of the Shirleys, eventually going to the great-grandfather of the current owner, the eldest surviving son from the first Earl Ferrers' second marriage.

Elder Branches.* Shirley of Staunton-Harold, in the county of Leicester, represented by Sewallis Edward, tenth Earl Ferrers 1711; and Shirley of Shirley, in the county of Derby, represented by the Rev. Walter Waddington Shirley, Canon of Christ Church, D.D. only son of the late Bishop of Sodor and Man, and great-grandson of Walter, younger brother of the fourth, fifth, and sixth Earls Ferrers.

Elder Branches.* Shirley of Staunton-Harold, in Leicester, represented by Sewallis Edward, the tenth Earl Ferrers, 1711; and Shirley of Shirley, in Derby, represented by Rev. Walter Waddington Shirley, Canon of Christ Church, D.D., the only son of the late Bishop of Sodor and Man, and great-grandson of Walter, who was the younger brother of the fourth, fifth, and sixth Earls Ferrers.

Younger Branches (extinct). Shirley, of Wiston, Preston, West-Grinstead, and Ote-Hall, all in Sussex, and all descended from the second marriage of Ralph Shirley, Esq., and Elizabeth Blount; which Ralph died in 1466. All these families are presumed to be extinct on the death of Sir William Warden Shirley, Baronet, in 1815.

Younger Branches (extinct). Shirley, of Wiston, Preston, West-Grinstead, and Ote-Hall, all in Sussex, and all descended from the second marriage of Ralph Shirley, Esq., and Elizabeth Blount; Ralph died in 1466. All these families are believed to be extinct following the death of Sir William Warden Shirley, Baronet, in 1815.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, ed. 2, vol. i. p. 621; Nichols's History of Leicestershire, vol. iii. pt. ii. p. 704-727; Stemmata Shirleiana, pr. pr. 4to. 1841; and Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 85.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed., vol. i, p. 621; Nichols's History of Leicestershire, vol. iii, pt. ii, pp. 704-727; Stemmata Shirleiana, pr. pr. 4to, 1841; and Brydges's Collins, vol. iv, p. 85.

Arms.—Paly of six, or and azure, a quarter ermine. The more ancient coat was, Paly of six, or and sable, as appears by the seal of "Sir Sewallis de Ethindon, Knight," with the legend, "Sum scutum de auro et nigro senis ductibus palatum," engraved in Dugdale's Warwickshire, and in Upton de Studio Militari. Indeed Sir Ralph Shirley bore it as late as the reign of Edward II; see Nicolas's Roll of that date, p. 73. Sir Hugh de Shirley bore the present coat (Roll of Richard II.): so did his father Sir Thomas, and his great-grandfather Sir James, as appears by their several seals engraved in Upton, &c.

Arms.—It features six vertical stripes in gold and blue, along with a section of ermine. The older coat had six vertical stripes in gold and black, as shown on the seal of "Sir Sewallis de Ethindon, Knight," which is inscribed with the phrase, "This shield is gold and black with six vertical stripes," documented in Dugdale's Warwickshire and Upton de Studio Militari. In fact, Sir Ralph Shirley used this design as recently as the reign of Edward II; see Nicolas's Roll from that period, p. 73. Sir Hugh de Shirley displayed the current coat (Roll of Richard II.), along with his father Sir Thomas and his great-grandfather Sir James, as evidenced by their various seals engraved in Upton, etc.

Present Representative, Evelyn Philip Shirley, Esq., late M. P. for South Warwickshire.

Present Representative, Evelyn Philip Shirley, Esq., former Member of Parliament for South Warwickshire.

* The Iretons of Little Ireton, in the county of Derby, extinct in 1711, were in fact the elder line of the family, sprung from Henry, eldest son of Fulcher, and elder brother of Sewallis de Shirley.




Bracebridge of Atherstone.

arms_page264.jpg

In the time of King John, the venerable family of Bracebridge, originally of Bracebridge in Lincolnshire, acquired by marriage in the person of Peter de Bracebridge with Amicia, daughter of Osbert de Arden and Maud, and granddaughter of Turchill de Warwick, the manor of Kingsbury in this county, an ancient seat of the Mercian Kings, and inherited by Turchill, called the last Saxon Earl of Warwick, with his second wife Leverunia. The descendants of which Peter and Amicia had their principal seat at Kingsbury till about the beginning of Queen Elizabeth's reign, when it was sold, and the Atherstone estate purchased. "Kinisbyri is a fair manor place," writes Leland, in his Itinerary, "and lordship of 140 li.; one Bracebridge is lord of it; it is in Warwikshir." At Bracebridge, on the river Witham, near Lincoln, the original seat of the family, so called it is supposed from the two bridges which still exist there, a grant of free warren was obtained in the 29th of Edward I., which was still retained by Thomas Bracebridge, Esq. who died in 1567.

During King John's reign, the respected Bracebridge family, originally from Bracebridge in Lincolnshire, gained the manor of Kingsbury in this county through Peter de Bracebridge's marriage to Amicia, the daughter of Osbert de Arden and Maud, and granddaughter of Turchill de Warwick. Kingsbury was an ancient home of the Mercian Kings and was inherited by Turchill, known as the last Saxon Earl of Warwick, from his second wife, Leverunia. The descendants of Peter and Amicia held their main residence at Kingsbury until around the start of Queen Elizabeth's reign, when it was sold and the Atherstone estate was acquired. "Kinisbyri is a fair manor place," writes Leland in his Itinerary, "and lordship of 140 li.; one Bracebridge is lord of it; it is in Warwikshir." At Bracebridge, on the river Witham near Lincoln, where the family originally lived, it is believed the name comes from the two bridges that still stand there. A grant of free warren was obtained in the 29th year of Edward I., which was still held by Thomas Bracebridge, Esq., who passed away in 1567.

The Bracebridges represent the Holtes of Aston, near Birmingham, and, through that ancient family, the Breretons of Cheshire.

The Bracebridges are linked to the Holtes of Aston, near Birmingham, and through that historic family, the Breretons of Cheshire.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 1057-1061; Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iii. part ii. p. 1145; for Holte, see Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 871, and Davidson's History of the Holtes of Aston, fol. 1854; for Brereton, see Ormerod's Cheshire, vol. iii. pt. 31.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 1057-1061; Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iii. part ii. p. 1145; for Holte, see Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 871, and Davidson's History of the Holtes of Aston, fol. 1854; for Brereton, see Ormerod's Cheshire, vol. iii. pt. 31.

Arms.—Vair, argent and sable, a fess gules. This coat was borne by Sir John de Brasbruge, de co. Lincoln, in the reign of Edward II. and again by Monsire de Brasbridge in those of Edward III. and Richard III. (Rolls).

Coat of Arms.—Vair, silver and black, with a red band. This coat was worn by Sir John de Brasbruge from Lincoln during the reign of Edward II, and later by Monsire de Brasbridge in the times of Edward III and Richard III. (Rolls).

Present Representative, Charles Holte Bracebridge, Esq.

Present Representative, Charles Holte Bracebridge, Esq.





Compton of Compton Wyniate, Marquess of Northampton 1812; Earl 1618; Baron 1572.

arms_page265.jpg

Although the early part of the pedigree of the Comptons is not entirely without doubt, we may conclude that the family was seated at Compton, called "in le Windgate," soon after the Conquest. Arnulphus de Compton and Osbertus de Compton were living in the 16th of Henry II., but Philip de Compton is the first of the name who certainly held the manor of Compton, in the fifth of John. Here the family continued resident for many ages; but its importance arose in a great degree from Sir William Compton having been brought up with Henry Duke of York, afterwards Henry VIII., and from the marriage of his great-grandson, the first Earl of Northampton, with the City Heiress of Spencer.

Although there is some uncertainty about the early history of the Comptons, we can conclude that the family established its presence at Compton, known as "in le Windgate," shortly after the Conquest. Arnulphus de Compton and Osbertus de Compton were living during the 16th year of Henry II, but Philip de Compton is the first confirmed holder of the manor of Compton, in the fifth year of John. The family remained living there for many generations; however, its significance grew mainly because Sir William Compton was raised alongside Henry Duke of York, who later became Henry VIII, and due to the marriage of his great-grandson, the first Earl of Northampton, to the heiress of the Spencer family.

The Comptons were pre-eminently distinguished for loyalty during the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century.

The Comptons were especially known for their loyalty during the Civil Wars of the 1600s.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 549; and Brydges's Collins, vol. iii. p. 223.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 549; and Brydges's Collins, vol. iii. p. 223.

Arms.—Sable, a lion of England or between three esquire's helmets argent. A former coat, borne by Thomas de Comptone, apparently about the reign of Edward III., was a chevron charged with three fleurs-de-lis. This is proved by a silver seal dug up at Compton in the year 1845; and the same arms are still to be traced on an ancient mutilated monument of a knight with collar of S.S., supposed to represent Sir Thomas de Compton, in the church of Compton Wyniate. The three helmets were afterwards adopted, and appear to have been the arms of a distinct family, the Comptons of Fenny Compton in this county; to which Henry VIII. gave the lion as an augmentation; at the same time, according to the custom of the period, was added a quartering to the family arms, viz.: Argent, a chevron azure, within a border vert bezantee.

Coat of Arms.—Black, a lion of England gold between three silver esquire's helmets. A previous coat, used by Thomas de Comptone, likely during the reign of Edward III, featured a chevron decorated with three fleurs-de-lis. This is supported by a silver seal discovered in Compton in 1845; the same arms can still be seen on an old, damaged monument of a knight with a collar of S.S., believed to represent Sir Thomas de Compton, in the church of Compton Wyniate. The three helmets were later adopted and appear to have belonged to a separate family, the Comptons of Fenny Compton in this county, to which Henry VIII added the lion as an enhancement; at the same time, consistent with the customs of the period, a quartering was added to the family arms, namely: Silver, a blue chevron, within a green border with gold bezants.

Present Representative, Charles Douglas Compton, 3rd Marquess of Northampton.

Present Representative, Charles Douglas Compton, 3rd Marquess of Northampton.





Chetwynd of Grendon, Baronet 1795.

arms_page266.jpg

The younger, but, in England, the only remaining branch of a very ancient family, denominated from Chetwynd, in Shropshire, and of Baxterly, in this county, in the 37th of Henry III. Sir William Chetwind was the first of the name seated at Grendon, in the 39th of Edward III., his mother being daughter and coheir of Sir Ralph de Grendon; but Ingestre, in Staffordshire, which came from the heiress of Mutton, was the principal seat of the Chetwinds, which was eventually carried by an heiress into the Talbot family (now Earl of Shrewsbury).

The younger branch, but the only one left in England from a very old family named after Chetwynd in Shropshire and Baxterly in this county, dates back to the 37th year of Henry III. Sir William Chetwind was the first of the name to settle at Grendon in the 39th year of Edward III, with his mother being the daughter and co-heir of Sir Ralph de Grendon. However, Ingestre in Staffordshire, which came from the heiress of Mutton, was the main seat of the Chetwinds, which was eventually inherited by an heiress who married into the Talbot family (now the Earls of Shrewsbury).

Elder Branch. The Viscounts Chetwynd of Ireland (1717).

Elder Branch. The Viscounts Chetwynd of Ireland (1717).

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 1101; Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, p. 61; Eyton's Shropshire, viii. p. 81; and Archdall's Lodge, vol. v. p. 148.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 1101; Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, p. 61; Eyton's Shropshire, viii. p. 81; and Archdall's Lodge, vol. v. p. 148.

Arms.—Azure, a chevron between three mullets or. In the reign of Edward II. Sir John Chetwind bore, Azure, a chevron or, without the mullets; the present coat was borne by others of the family in the reigns of Edward III. and Richard II. (Rolls.)

Coat of Arms.—Blue, with a chevron between three stars. During the rule of Edward II, Sir John Chetwind had Blue, with a gold chevron, without the stars; the current coat was used by other family members during the reigns of Edward III and Richard II. (Rolls.)

Present Representative, Sir George Chetwynd, third Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir George Chetwynd, third Baronet.





Feilding of Newnham Paddox, Earl of Denbigh 1622.

arms_page267.jpg

The princely extraction of this noble family from the counts of Hapsburg in Germany is well known; its ancestor, Galfridus, or Geffrey, came into England in the twelfth year of the reign of Henry III., and received large possessions from that monarch. The name is derived from Rinfelden, in Germany, where, and at Lauffenburg, were the patrimonial possessions of the house of Hapsburg. Newnham was in possession of John Fildying in the twelfth of Henry VI., inherited from his mother Joan, daughter and heir of William Prudhome.

The royal lineage of this noble family comes from the counts of Hapsburg in Germany, which is well known. Their ancestor, Galfridus, or Geoffrey, arrived in England during the twelfth year of Henry III's reign and was granted extensive land by the king. The name is derived from Rinfelden in Germany, where the ancestral lands of the Hapsburg family were located, along with Lauffenburg. Newnham was owned by John Fildying in the twelfth year of Henry VI, passed down from his mother, Joan, who was the daughter and heir of William Prudhome.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 86; Brydges's Collins' vol. iii. p. 265; and Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iv. pt. i. p. 273, for the history of this illustrious family, compiled by Nathaniel Wanley about the year 1670.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 86; Brydges's Collins' vol. iii. p. 265; and Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iv. pt. i. p. 273, for the history of this notable family, compiled by Nathaniel Wanley around the year 1670.

Arms.—Argent, on a fess azure three fusils or. The present coat was borne in the reigns of Edward III. and Richard II., as appears by Seals of those dates.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a blue band featuring three gold diamonds. This coat of arms was in use during the reigns of Edward III and Richard II, as evidenced by seals from that period.

Present Representative, Rudolph William Basil Feilding, 8th Earl of Denbigh.

Present Representative, Rudolph William Basil Feilding, 8th Earl of Denbigh.





Staunton of Longbridge.

arms_page268.jpg

This family is stated by Thomas, in his additions to Dugdale's Warwickshire, to be a branch of the Stauntons of Staunton, in the county of Nottingham, an ancient house which is traced to the Conquest, and was lately represented by Sir George Staunton, Baronet of Ireland 1785, extinct 1859. The first of the line seated in Warwickshire was Thomas Staunton, in the 39th of Henry VI., 1461. The parent house, existing in the male line, until the year 1688, at Staunton, in Nottinghamshire, held their lands by tenure of Castle-Guard, by keeping and defending a tower in the Castle of Belvoir, to this day called Staunton Tower. There is an ancient custom also that the chief of the house of Staunton should present the key of this tower to any of the Royal Family who may honour Belvoir with their presence.

This family is noted by Thomas, in his additions to Dugdale's Warwickshire, as a branch of the Stauntons of Staunton in Nottinghamshire, an ancient lineage traced back to the Conquest, which was recently represented by Sir George Staunton, Baronet of Ireland (1785), who passed away in 1859. The first member of this line settled in Warwickshire was Thomas Staunton, during the 39th year of Henry VI, in 1461. The main house continued through the male line until 1688 at Staunton in Nottinghamshire, holding their lands under a tenure called Castle-Guard, which involved maintaining and defending a tower in the Castle of Belvoir, still known as Staunton Tower today. There's also a historical custom that the chief of the Staunton family should present the key of this tower to any member of the Royal Family who visits Belvoir.

Younger Branch. Staunton of Wolverton, in this county, settled there in the eighteenth of Elizabeth; extinct in the last century.

Younger Branch. Staunton of Wolverton, in this county, settled there in the 18th year of Elizabeth; extinct in the past century.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 665; Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, p. 157; and for the poetical pedigree of this house, Ib. p. 159; the monuments at p. 164; see also "Memoirs of the Life and Family of the late Sir G. L. Staunton, Bart." pr. pr. 8vo. 1833.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 665; Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, p. 157; and for the poetic ancestry of this family, Ib. p. 159; the memorials at p. 164; also check "Memoirs of the Life and Family of the late Sir G. L. Staunton, Bart." pr. pr. 8vo. 1833.

Arms.—Argent, two chevrons within a border engrailed sable. Founded on the coat of Albany Lord of Belvoir, who bore, Or, two chevrons and a border gules. The elder line of Staunton sometimes omitted the border; see the tombs in the church of Staunton.

Arms.—Silver, two chevrons within an indented black border. This is inspired by the coat of arms of Albany Lord of Belvoir, which features Gold, two chevrons and a red border. The older branch of Staunton sometimes omitted the border; refer to the tombs in the church of Staunton.

Present Representative, John Staunton, Esq.

Presenting Representative, John Staunton, Esq.





Ferrers of Baddesley-Clinton.

arms_page269.jpg

The sole remains of what was perhaps during the middle ages the most powerful Norman family in England. Illustrious both for the antiquity of race, the former political consequence, and the splendour of connection of the various branches, of which the forfeited Earls of Derby, and De Ferrariis, or Ferrers, were the chiefs. Descended from Henry de Feriers at the time of the Conquest, who held in chief 210 lordships in fourteen counties of England, besides the castle and borough of Tutbury, in Staffordshire, the principal seat of the earldom.

The only remaining traces of what was likely the most powerful Norman family in England during the Middle Ages. Famous for its long lineage, past political importance, and the prestige of its various branches, with the lost Earls of Derby and De Ferrariis, or Ferrers, being the most notable. This family descended from Henry de Ferriers at the time of the Conquest, who held 210 lordships in fourteen counties across England, in addition to the castle and borough of Tutbury in Staffordshire, which was the main seat of the earldom.

The Baddesley-Clinton line was founded by Sir Edward Ferrers, (son of Sir Henry, who was second son of Thomas Ferrers, of Tamworth Castle, in this county,) by his marriage with Constantia, daughter and heiress of Nicholas Brome, of Baddesley. He died in 1535.

The Baddesley-Clinton line was established by Sir Edward Ferrers, (son of Sir Henry, who was the second son of Thomas Ferrers, from Tamworth Castle in this county,) through his marriage to Constantia, the daughter and heiress of Nicholas Brome, from Baddesley. He passed away in 1535.

After the forfeiture of the Earldom of Derby, in the reign of Henry III., and the vast possessions attached to it, the Castle of Chartley, in Staffordshire, inherited from Agnes, daughter and coheir of Ranulph, Earl of Chester, became the seat of the principal male line, extinct on the death of William Lord Ferrers of Chartley in the 28th of Henry VI. The representation of the family thereupon devolved on the Ferrers's of Tamworth, sprung from the house of Groby, who were founded by William, younger brother of the last Earl of Derby: and on the decease of John Ferrers, of Tamworth, Esq. in 1680, the present family of Baddesley-Clinton succeeded as chief of this illustrious house.

After the loss of the Earldom of Derby during Henry III's reign, along with its extensive lands, Chartley Castle in Staffordshire, inherited from Agnes, the daughter and coheir of Ranulph, Earl of Chester, became the seat of the main male lineage, which ended with the death of William Lord Ferrers of Chartley in the 28th year of Henry VI. The family's representation then passed to the Ferrers of Tamworth, who descended from the Groby line established by William, the younger brother of the last Earl of Derby. Following the death of John Ferrers of Tamworth, Esq. in 1680, the present Baddesley-Clinton family ascended as the heads of this distinguished house.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 971, for Baddesley-Clinton, where however will be found no engravings of the monuments of the Ferrers's, "because," says Dugdale, "so frugall a person is the present heir of the family, now (1656) residing here, as that he refusing to contribute anything towards the charge thereof, they are omitted." For Ferrers of Chartley, and the Earls of Derby, see Sir O. Mosley's History of Tutbury, 8vo. 1832; and Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 1089; and for Ferrers of Tamworth, the same, p. 1135.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 971, for Baddesley-Clinton, where, however, there are no engravings of the Ferrers monuments because, as Dugdale states, "the current heir of the family, now (1656) living here, is so frugal that he refuses to contribute anything towards the cost, so they are left out." For Ferrers of Chartley and the Earls of Derby, check out Sir O. Mosley's History of Tutbury, 8vo. 1832; and Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. p. 1089; and for Ferrers of Tamworth, see the same, p. 1135.

Arms.—Gules, seven mascles or, a canton ermine. This was the coat of Quinci, Earl of Winchester, from whom the Ferrers of Groby were descended, the canton being added for difference. The original coat assigned to the first Earls of Derby, was, Argent, six horseshoes sable; afterwards, Vair or and gules, within a bordure of horseshoes, was used. The Chartley line bore only, Vair, or and gules, which was latterly also borne by Ferrers of Tamworth. The Quinci coat was used by William de Ferrers at Carlaverock in 1300. (See the Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Red, with seven gold mascles and an ermine canton. This was the coat of Quinci, Earl of Winchester, from whom the Ferrers of Groby were descended, with the canton added for distinction. The original coat given to the first Earls of Derby was Silver, with six black horseshoes; later, Vair gold and red, within a border of horseshoes, was used. The Chartley line only carried Vair, gold and red, which was also later used by the Ferrers of Tamworth. The Quinci coat was used by William de Ferrers at Carlaverock in 1300. (See the Roll.)

Present Representative, Marmion Edward Ferrers, Esq.

Present Representative, Marmion Edward Ferrers, Esq.





Mordaunt of Walton, Baronet 1611.

arms_page270.jpg

Turvey in Bedfordshire was the principal seat in England of this noble Norman family, descended from Osbert le Mordaunt, who came over from Normandy with William the Conqueror, and received a grant of the lordship of Radwell in that county. In 1529, John Mordaunt, the representative of the family, was summoned to Parliament by writ as Baron Mordaunt of Turvey. His great-great-grandson was created Earl of Peterborough in 1628; which title, together with the elder line of the family, became extinct on the decease of Charles-Henry Mordaunt, fifth Earl, in 1814.

Turvey in Bedfordshire was the main seat in England for this noble Norman family, which descended from Osbert le Mordaunt, who came to England from Normandy with William the Conqueror and was granted the lordship of Radwell in that county. In 1529, John Mordaunt, the head of the family, was summoned to Parliament by writ as Baron Mordaunt of Turvey. His great-great-grandson was made Earl of Peterborough in 1628; that title, along with the elder line of the family, became extinct with the death of Charles-Henry Mordaunt, the fifth Earl, in 1814.

The present family descend from Robert, son of William Mordaunt of Hemsted, in Essex, who was second son of William Mordaunt of Turvey, living in the 11th of Henry IV., which Robert married Barbara, daughter of John le Strange, of Massingham-Parva in Norfolk, and of Walton-D'Eivile, in this county, which since the 32nd year of Henry VIII., 1549-50, has remained the inheritance of their descendants.

The current family is descended from Robert, the son of William Mordaunt of Hemsted in Essex, who was the second son of William Mordaunt of Turvey, who lived during the 11th year of Henry IV. Robert married Barbara, the daughter of John le Strange of Massingham-Parva in Norfolk and Walton-D'Eivile in this county. Since the 32nd year of Henry VIII, 1549-50, this has remained the inheritance of their descendants.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 577: Parkins's continuation of Blomefield's Norfolk, vol. iv. p. 643; and that very rare volume compiled by order of the second Earl of Peterborough, called "Halstead's Genealogies," fo. 1685, privately printed.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 577: Parkins's continuation of Blomefield's Norfolk, vol. iv. p. 643; and that very rare book compiled by order of the second Earl of Peterborough, called "Halstead's Genealogies," fo. 1685, privately printed.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three estoiles sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, a chevron between three black estoiles.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Mordaunt, 10th. Baronet, M. P. for South Warwickshire.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Mordaunt, 10th Baronet, MP for South Warwickshire.





Biddulph of Birdingbury, Baronet 1654.

arms_page271.jpg

This ancient family, originally of Biddulph, in the northern parts of Staffordshire, is traced to Ormus, mentioned in the Domesday Survey. He was, it is said, of Norman descent, and is supposed to have married the Saxon heiress of Biddulph, from whence the name was afterwards assumed. The elder line terminated on the death of' John Biddulph, Esq. of Biddulph and of Burton in Sussex, in the year 1835. The Birdingbury branch, now representing this venerable house, was founded by Symon, second son of Richard Biddulph, of Biddulph, in the time of Henry VIII., whose descendant, another Symon, purchased Birdingbury in 1687. The family were eminently loyal during the Civil Wars, when the ancient seat of Biddulph was destroyed by the Cromwellians about 1643-4.

This old family, originally from Biddulph in northern Staffordshire, can be traced back to Ormus, mentioned in the Domesday Survey. He is said to be of Norman descent and is thought to have married the Saxon heiress of Biddulph, from which the name was later adopted. The main branch ended with the death of John Biddulph, Esq. of Biddulph and Burton in Sussex, in 1835. The Birdingbury branch, which now carries on this historic line, was founded by Symon, the second son of Richard Biddulph of Biddulph, during the reign of Henry VIII, whose descendant, another Symon, bought Birdingbury in 1687. The family showed strong loyalty during the Civil Wars when the old estate of Biddulph was destroyed by Cromwell's forces around 1643-4.

Younger Branch. Biddulph of Ledbury, in the county of Hereford, descended from Anthony, younger brother of the first Baronet.

Younger Branch. Biddulph of Ledbury, in Herefordshire, descended from Anthony, the younger brother of the first Baronet.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 324; Shaw's History of Staffordshire, vol. i. p. 352; Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, p. 8; Ward's History of the Borough of Stoke-upon-Trent, p. 277; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 442.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 324; Shaw's History of Staffordshire, vol. i. p. 352; Erdeswick's Staffordshire, ed. 1844, p. 8; Ward's History of the Borough of Stoke-upon-Trent, p. 277; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 442.

Arms.—Vert, an eagle displayed argent, armed and langued gules. Argent, three soldering-irons sable, is also said to have been borne by the Biddulphs.

Coat of Arms.—Green background, a silver eagle displayed with red beak and talons. Silver also features three black soldering irons, which are said to have been used by the Biddulphs.

Present Representative, Sir Theophilus William Biddulph, 7th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Theophilus William Biddulph, 7th Baronet.





Skipwith of Harborough, Baronet 1622 (formerly of Newbold Hall).

arms_page272.jpg

The name is derived from Skipwith, in the East Riding of Yorkshire, and was first borne by Patrick, living in the reign of Henry I., who was second son of Robert de Estotevile, Baron of Cottingham in the reign of William the Conqueror. In the reign of Henry III. the Skipwiths removed into Lincolnshire, and were seated at Beckeby and Ormesby, in that county; a younger son of Sir William Skipwith, of Ormesby, who died in 1587, was of Prestwould, in Leicestershire. He was the ancestor of the Skipwiths of Newbold Hall, created Baronet in 1670, extinct in 1790, and of the present family, who for five generations were of Virginia, in America, where the grandfather of the present Baronet was born.

The name comes from Skipwith, in the East Riding of Yorkshire, and was first used by Patrick, who lived during the reign of Henry I. He was the second son of Robert de Estotevile, Baron of Cottingham in the time of William the Conqueror. During the reign of Henry III, the Skipwith family moved to Lincolnshire and settled at Beckeby and Ormesby in that county. A younger son of Sir William Skipwith from Ormesby, who died in 1587, lived in Prestwould, Leicestershire. He was the ancestor of the Skipwiths of Newbold Hall, who were made Baronet in 1670 and went extinct in 1790, and of the current family, who have been in Virginia, America, for five generations, where the grandfather of the current Baronet was born.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 84; Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iii. pt. i. p. 368; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 536,

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 84; Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iii. pt. i. p. 368; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 536,

Arms.—Argent, three bars pules, in chief a greyhound courant sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with three purple stripes, above which is a running black greyhound.

Present Representative, Sir Peyton Estoteville Skipwith, 10th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Peyton Estoteville Skipwith, 10th Baronet.





Gentle.

Shuckburgh of Shuckburgh, Baronet 1660.

arms_page273.jpg

The antiquity of this family need not be doubted, although the lineal descent, as Dugdale avouches, is not very plain. William de Suckeberge is presumed to be the first who assumed the name, from Shuckborough Superior, in this county; he was living in the third of John. The pedigree is deduced by Baker, in his History of Northamptonshire, from John de Shuckburgh, living in the first of Edward III. In the seventh of Henry V. his great-grandson William is ranked amongst those knights and esquires of this county who bore ancient arms from their ancestors. It was to Richard Shuckburgh, head of the family in 1642, that the remarkable incident happened which is related by Dugdale. Charles I. having met him hunting with his hounds a day or two before the battle of Edgehill, "Who is that," said the King, "hunting so merrily, while I am about to fight for my crown and dignity?" He was knighted the next day, and proved his loyalty at the battle of Edge-hill. He died in 1656, and his son was rewarded with the Baronetcy on the Restoration.

The ancient history of this family is clear, even if the direct lineage, as Dugdale states, isn’t very straightforward. William de Suckeberge is thought to be the first person to take on the name, coming from Shuckborough Superior in this county; he lived during the reign of King John. Baker traces the family tree in his History of Northamptonshire back to John de Shuckburgh, who lived during the first reign of Edward III. In the seventh year of Henry V, his great-grandson William was listed among the knights and gentlemen from this county who carried on the traditional family arms. In 1642, Richard Shuckburgh, the head of the family, experienced a notable event that Dugdale recounts. Charles I, having encountered him while hunting with his dogs just a day or two before the battle of Edgehill, remarked, "Who is that, hunting so merrily, while I am about to fight for my crown and dignity?" He was knighted the following day and showed his loyalty at the battle of Edgehill. He passed away in 1656, and his son was honored with the title of Baronet after the monarchy’s restoration.

Younger Branch. Shuckburgh of Downton, Wiltshire, descended from Charles, fourth son of the first Baronet.

Younger Branch. Shuckburgh of Downton, Wiltshire, is a descendant of Charles, the fourth son of the first Baronet.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 309; Baker's Northamptonshire, vol. i. p. 371; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 76; and Hoare's Modern Wiltshire, vol. iv. p. 34.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 309; Baker's Northamptonshire, vol. i. p. 371; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 76; and Hoare's Modern Wiltshire, vol. iv. p. 34.

Arms.—Sable, a chevron between three mullets pierced argent. This coat is evidently founded on the arms of Danvers, the Norman family under whom the Shuckburghs held: it has been fondly assumed that the mullets are allusive to the astroites found in the ploughed fields at Shuckburgh.

Coat of Arms.—Black background, featuring a chevron between three silver stars. This coat of arms is clearly influenced by the arms of Danvers, the Norman family connected to the Shuckburghs: it’s often thought that the stars represent the sea stars found in the plowed fields at Shuckburgh.

Present Representative, Sir Francis Shuckburgh, 8th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Francis Shuckburgh, 8th Baronet.





Throckmorton of Coughton, Baronet 1642.

arms_page274.jpg

The name is derived from Throcmorton, in the parish of Fladbury, in the county of Worcester, where John de Trockemerton, the supposed ancestor of this family, was living about the year 1200. From this John descended, after many generations, another "John Throkmerton," who was, according the Leland, "the first setter up of his name to any worship in Throkmerton village, the which was at that tyme neither of his inheritance or purchase, but as a thing taken of the Sete of Wircester in farme, bycause he bore the name of the lordeship and village. This John was Under-Treasurer of England about the tyme of Henry V.;" and married Elianor, daughter and coheir of Guido de la Spine, and thus became possessed of Coughton, in the parish of Hadley, in this county, which has continued the principal seat of the family, of whom the most remarkable was Sir Nicholas Throckmorton, ambassador in France, in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, who died in 1570.

The name comes from Throcmorton, in the parish of Fladbury, in the county of Worcester, where John de Trockemerton, the supposed ancestor of this family, lived around the year 1200. From this John descended, after many generations, another "John Throkmerton," who was, according to Leland, "the first to establish his name in any notable way in Throkmerton village, which at that time was neither his inheritance nor a purchase, but rather something taken on lease from the See of Worcester, because he carried the name of the lordship and village. This John was Under-Treasurer of England around the time of Henry V; " and married Elianor, daughter and coheir of Guido de la Spine, and thus became the owner of Coughton, in the parish of Hadley, in this county, which has continued to be the main seat of the family, of whom the most notable was Sir Nicholas Throckmorton, ambassador to France during the reign of Queen Elizabeth, who died in 1570.

Younger Branches (now extinct), were the Throckmortons of Stoughton and Ellington, in Huntingdonshire, [for the latter see Camden's Visitation of that county in 1613, printed by the Camden Society in 1849, p. 123;] and the Carews of Bedington, in Surrey, Baronet 1714, extinct 1764; descended in the male line from Sir Nicholas, younger son of Sir Nicholas Throckmorton, and Anne, daughter of Sir Nicholas Carew, Knt.; see Wotton's Baronetage, vol. ii. pi 351, and vol. iv. p. 159; Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. pp. 749 and 819; Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. p. 452; Leland's Itinerary, vol. iv. p. 16; and for the poetical life of Sir Nicholas Throckmorton, see Peck's Memoirs of Milton.

Younger Branches (now extinct) included the Throckmortons of Stoughton and Ellington in Huntingdonshire, [for the latter see Camden's Visitation of that county in 1613, printed by the Camden Society in 1849, p. 123;] and the Carews of Bedington in Surrey, Baronet 1714, extinct 1764; they descended in the male line from Sir Nicholas, the younger son of Sir Nicholas Throckmorton, and Anne, the daughter of Sir Nicholas Carew, Knt.; see Wotton's Baronetage, vol. ii. pi 351, and vol. iv. p. 159; Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. pp. 749 and 819; Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. p. 452; Leland's Itinerary, vol. iv. p. 16; and for the poetic life of Sir Nicholas Throckmorton, see Peck's Memoirs of Milton.

Arms.—Gules, on a chevron argent three bars gemelles sable.

Coat of Arms.—Red background, featuring a silver chevron with three black stripes.

Present Representative, Sir Nicholas William Throckmorton, 9th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Nicholas William Throckmorton, 9th Baronet.





Sheldon of Brailes.

arms_page276.jpg

The descent of this family from the ancient house of Sheldon, of Sheldon, in this county, is a matter of doubt, but admitted by Dugdale to be not improbable. It appears to be proved that the Sheldons are descended from John Sheldon, of Abberton, in Worcestershire, in the reign of Henry IV. Nash, in his History of that county, carries the pedigree two descents higher, viz., to Richard Sheldon of Rowley, in the county of Stafford, whose grandson John was of the same place in the fourth of Edward IV. The manor of Beoly, in Worcestershire, was purchased of Richard Neville Lord Latimer by William Sheldon in the same reign, and continued till the destruction of the mansion-house by fire in the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century, the principal seat of the family, who were connected with Warwickshire by the marriage of William Sheldon, Esq. with Mary, daughter and coheir of William Willington, of Barcheston, Esq., in the reign of Henry VIII. It was this William Sheldon who purchased the manor of Weston, in the parish of Long-Compton, in this county, and here his son Ralph built "a very fair house" in the reign of Queen Elizabeth; but these estates have both, within the memory of man, passed from this ancient family, who still possess considerable properly at Brailes, purchased by William Sheldon in the first of Edward VI.

The descent of this family from the ancient house of Sheldon, in this county, is uncertain, but Dugdale acknowledged it to be quite possible. It seems proven that the Sheldons descend from John Sheldon, of Abberton, in Worcestershire, during the reign of Henry IV. Nash, in his History of that county, traces the lineage two generations further back to Richard Sheldon of Rowley, in Staffordshire, whose grandson John lived in the same place in the fourth year of Edward IV. The manor of Beoly, in Worcestershire, was bought from Richard Neville Lord Latimer by William Sheldon in the same reign, and remained the main residence of the family until the mansion was destroyed by fire during the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century. They were linked to Warwickshire through the marriage of William Sheldon, Esq. with Mary, the daughter and co-heir of William Willington of Barcheston, Esq., in the reign of Henry VIII. It was this William Sheldon who acquired the manor of Weston, in the parish of Long-Compton, in this county, and here his son Ralph built "a very fair house" during the reign of Queen Elizabeth; but both of these estates have, within living memory, been lost to this ancient family, who still own considerable property at Brailes, purchased by William Sheldon in the first year of Edward VI.

Younger branches of the Sheldons were formerly of Abberton, Childswicombe, Broadway, and Spechley, in Worcestershire. See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 584; and Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. pp. 65 and 144.

Younger branches of the Sheldons used to be from Abberton, Childswicombe, Broadway, and Spechley in Worcestershire. See Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 584; and Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. pp. 65 and 144.

Arms.—Sable, a fess between three sheldrakes argent.

Coat of Arms.—Black, featuring a white band between three silver sheldrakes.

Present Representative, Henry James Sheldon, Esq.

Present Representative, Henry James Sheldon, Esq.





Gregory of Styvechall.

arms_page277a.jpg

This family is traced to John Gregory, Lord of the manors of Freseley and Asfordby, in the county of Leicester, who married Maud, daughter of Sir Roger Moton, of Peckleton, knight; his son, Richard Gregory, of the same places, died in the year 1292. Arthur Gregory, Esquire, the representative of this ancient family, was seated at Styvechall, within the county of the city of Coventry, of which his father, Thomas, died seized in the sixteenth of Elizabeth.

This family can be traced back to John Gregory, Lord of the manors of Freseley and Asfordby in Leicester, who married Maud, the daughter of Sir Roger Moton of Peckleton, a knight. His son, Richard Gregory, from the same places, passed away in 1292. Arthur Gregory, Esquire, the representative of this old family, was based in Styvechall, within the county of the city of Coventry, where his father, Thomas, died holding land in the sixteenth year of Elizabeth's reign.

See Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iii. pt. i. p. 19; and Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 202.

See Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iii. pt. i. p. 19; and Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. i. p. 202.

Arms.—Or, two bars and in chief a lion passant azure.

Coat of Arms.—Gold background with two horizontal bars and a blue lion walking in the upper section.

Present Representative, Arthur Francis Gregory, Esq.

Present Representative, Arthur Francis Gregory, Esq.





Greville of Warwick Castle, Earl Brooke 1746, and Earl of Warwick 1759; Baron 1620-1.

arms_page277b.jpg

This family was founded by the wool-trade in the fourteenth century by William Grevel, "the flower of the wool merchants of the whole realm of England," who died and was buried at Campden, in Gloucestershire, in 1401. He it was who purchased Milcote, in this county, long the seat of the elder line of this family, who, after a succession of crimes, the particulars of which may be seen in Dugdale's Warwickshire, became extinct in the reign of James I. Fulke, second son of Sir Edward Greville of Milcote, who died in the 20th of Henry VIII., having married Elizabeth, one of the daughters and coheiress of Edward Willoughby, only son of Robert Willoughby, Lord Brooke, became possessed of Beauchamp's Court, in the parish of Alcester, inherited from her grandmother Elizabeth, the eldest of the daughters and coheirs of the last Lord Beauchamp of Powyke. This Fulke Greville was grandfather of the more celebrated Sir Fulke Greville, Lord Brooke, "servant to Queen Elizabeth, Counsellor to King James, and friend to Sir Philip Sidney," who died in 1628. "The fanatic Brooke," killed at Lichfield Close, was his cousin and successor, and ancestor of the present family. The Castle of Warwick was granted to Sir Fulke Greville by James I. in the second year of his reign.

This family was established in the wool trade in the 14th century by William Grevel, "the best of the wool merchants in all of England," who died and was buried in Campden, Gloucestershire, in 1401. He purchased Milcote in this county, which long served as the home of the elder branch of this family, who, after a series of crimes—details of which can be found in Dugdale's Warwickshire—eventually became extinct during the reign of James I. Fulke, the second son of Sir Edward Greville of Milcote, who died in the 20th year of Henry VIII, married Elizabeth, one of the daughters and co-heirs of Edward Willoughby, the only son of Robert Willoughby, Lord Brooke. He acquired Beauchamp's Court in the parish of Alcester, inherited from her grandmother Elizabeth, the eldest of the daughters and co-heirs of the last Lord Beauchamp of Powyke. This Fulke Greville was the grandfather of the more well-known Sir Fulke Greville, Lord Brooke, "servant to Queen Elizabeth, counselor to King James, and friend to Sir Philip Sidney," who died in 1628. "The fanatic Brooke," who was killed at Lichfield Close, was his cousin and successor, and an ancestor of the current family. The Castle of Warwick was granted to Sir Fulke Greville by James I in the second year of his reign.

Younger Branch. Greville of North Myms Place, in the county of Hertford, and of Westmeath, in Ireland, descended from Algernon, second son of Fulke 5th Lord Brooke.

Younger Branch. Greville of North Myms Place, in Hertfordshire, and of Westmeath, in Ireland, is a descendant of Algernon, the second son of Fulke, 5th Lord Brooke.

See Leland's Itinerary, vol. iv. pt. i. fol. 16, vol. vi. fol. 19; Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. pp. 706, 766; Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 330; and Edmondson's Account of the Greville Family, 8vo. 1766.

See Leland's Itinerary, vol. iv. pt. i. fol. 16, vol. vi. fol. 19; Dugdale's Warwickshire, vol. ii. pp. 706, 766; Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 330; and Edmondson's Account of the Greville Family, 8vo. 1766.

Arms.—Sable, on a cross engrailed or, five pellets within a border engrailed of the second. The present coat, with the addition of a mullet in the first quarter, was borne by William Grevil, of Campden, as appears by his brass, still in good preservation; his son John differenced his arms with ten annulets, in lieu of the five pellets; both were omitted by the Grevilles of Milcote.

Coat of Arms.—Black, featuring a notched gold cross with five round dots inside a notched gold border. The current coat, now with a star in the first quarter, was used by William Grevil of Campden, as indicated by his well-preserved brass; his son John changed his arms to include ten rings instead of the five dots. Both versions were omitted by the Grevilles of Milcote.

Present Representative, George Guy Greville, 4th Earl of Warwick.

Present Representative, George Guy Greville, 4th Earl of Warwick.





WESTMORLAND.

Knightly.

Lowther of Lowther-Castle, Earl of Lonsdale 1807; Baron 1797; Baronet 1764.

arms_page279.jpg

Eminently a knightly family, traced by Brydges to Sir Gervase de Lowther, living in the reign of Henry III. Other authorities make Sir Hugh de Lowther, knight of the shire for this county, in the 28th of Edward I., the first recorded ancestor; his great-grandson was at Agincourt in 1415. There have been three principal branches of this family, the first descended from Sir John Lowther, created a Baronet of Nova Scotia in 1640, who was grandfather of the first Viscount Lonsdale (1696), extinct on the death of the third Viscount in 1750. The second family sprung from Richard, third son of Sir John Lowther; and the third and present family descended from William, third son of a former Sir John Lowther, of Lowther, who died in 1637.

This family is definitely a knightly one, traced by Brydges back to Sir Gervase de Lowther, who lived during the reign of Henry III. Other sources identify Sir Hugh de Lowther, a knight for the county in the 28th year of Edward I’s reign, as the first recorded ancestor; his great-grandson fought at Agincourt in 1415. There are three main branches of this family: the first is descended from Sir John Lowther, who was made a Baronet of Nova Scotia in 1640 and was the grandfather of the first Viscount Lonsdale (1696), which ended when the third Viscount died in 1750. The second branch comes from Richard, the third son of Sir John Lowther; and the third and currently active branch descends from William, the third son of an earlier Sir John Lowther of Lowther, who passed away in 1637.

Younger Branch. Lowther of Swillington, in the county of York, Baronet 1824, descended from John, second son of Sir William Lowther, who died in 1788.

Younger Branch. Lowther of Swillington, in York County, Baronet 1824, descended from John, the second son of Sir William Lowther, who passed away in 1788.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. v. p. 695; Burn's Westmorland, vol. i. p. 428; Whitaker's Leeds, vol. i. p. 281; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. ii. p. 302.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. v. p. 695; Burn's Westmorland, vol. i. p. 428; Whitaker's Leeds, vol. i. p. 281; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. ii. p. 302.

Arms.—Or, six annulets sable, and borne by Monsire Louther, in the reign of Edward III. (Roll )

Coat of Arms.—Gold, featuring six black rings, used by Monsire Louther during the reign of Edward III. (Roll)

Present Representative, William Lowther, 2nd Earl of Lonsdale.

Present Representative, William Lowther, 2nd Earl of Lonsdale.





Strickland of Sizergh.

arms_page280.jpg

Descended from Walter de Stirkland, Knight, so called from the pasture-ground of the young cattle, called stirks or steers, in the parish of Morland, in this county; who was living in the reign of Henry III. A good account of this family, derived from original evidences, is given by Burn.

Descended from Walter de Stirkland, Knight, named after the pasture for young cattle, known as stirks or steers, in the parish of Morland in this county; who lived during the reign of Henry III. A detailed account of this family, based on original documents, is provided by Burn.

Sizergh, in the parish of Helsington, appears to have belonged to the Stricklands in the reign of Edward I. Sir Walter de Strickland had licence to empark there in the ninth of Edward III. During the civil wars of the seventeenth century the head of this house was loyal, while Walter, son of Sir William Strickland, of Boynton, Baronet 1641, was one of Cromwell's pretended House of Peers. The Stricklands of Boynton are supposed to be a younger branch of the house of Sizergh. The Stricklands called Standish, of Standish, in the county of Lancaster, represent the elder line, the present Mr. Standish being the eldest son of the late Thomas Strickland, of Sizergh, Esq.

Sizergh, located in the parish of Helsington, seems to have belonged to the Stricklands during the reign of Edward I. Sir Walter de Strickland received permission to create a park there during the ninth year of Edward III. During the civil wars in the seventeenth century, the head of this family remained loyal, while Walter, the son of Sir William Strickland of Boynton, Baronet 1641, was part of Cromwell's so-called House of Peers. The Stricklands of Boynton are believed to be a younger branch of the Sizergh family. The Stricklands called Standish, from Standish in Lancashire, represent the older line, with the current Mr. Standish being the eldest son of the late Thomas Strickland of Sizergh, Esq.

See Burn's Westmorland, vol. i. p. 87; and Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. ii. p. 333.

See Burn's Westmorland, vol. i. p. 87; and Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. ii. p. 333.

Arms.—Sable, three escallops within a border engrailed argent. The present coat, but without the border, was borne by Walter de Strykelande, in the reign of Richard II. Another coat, used in the reign of Edward II. was Argent, two bars and a quarter gules. (Rolls.) The Stricklands of Boynton bear, Gules, a chevron or between three crosses patée argent, on a canton ermine a stag's head erased sable.

Coat of Arms.—Black, with three scallops set against a wavy silver border. The current design, but without the border, was used by Walter de Strykelande during the reign of Richard II. An earlier design, used in the reign of Edward II, featured Silver, with two bars and a red quarter. (Rolls.) The Stricklands of Boynton display Red, with a gold chevron between three silver crosses, on a black and white canton a black stag's head erased.

Present Representative, Walter Strickland, Esq.

Present Representative, Walter Strickland, Esq.





Fleming of Rydal; Baronet 1705.

arms_page281.jpg

Michael le Fleming, living in the reign of William the Conqueror, is the ancestor of this ancient family, originally seated in Cumberland and at Gleston, in Furness, in Lancashire. Isabel, daughter of Sir John de Lancastre, living in the sixth of Henry VI., having married Sir Thomas le Fleming, of Coniston, Knight, seated the Flemings at Rydal, ever since the residence of the family.

Michael le Fleming, who lived during the reign of William the Conqueror, is the ancestor of this old family, originally based in Cumberland and at Gleston, in Furness, Lancashire. Isabel, the daughter of Sir John de Lancastre, who lived during the sixth year of Henry VI., married Sir Thomas le Fleming of Coniston, Knight, and established the Flemings at Rydal, where the family has lived ever since.

See Burn's Westmorland, vol. i. p. 150; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iv. p. 105.

See Burn's Westmorland, vol. i. p. 150; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iv. p. 105.

Arms.—Gules, fretty argent. The present coat, called "The arms of Hoddleston," with a label vert, was borne by John Fleming de Westmerland in the reign of Edward III. (Roll.) A more ancient coat, according to Wotton, was a Fleur-de-lis, within a roundell.

Arms.—Red, crossed with silver. The current coat, referred to as "The arms of Hoddleston," featuring a green label, was utilized by John Fleming of Westmerland during the reign of Edward III. (Roll.) An earlier coat, as mentioned by Wotton, displayed a Fleur-de-lis inside a circle.

Present Representative, Sir Michael le Fleming, 7th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Michael le Fleming, 7th Baronet.





Gentle.

Wybergh of Clifton.

arms_page282.jpg

In the thirty-eighth year of the reign of Edward III., William de Wybergh, of Saint Bee's, in Cumberland, became possessed of the manor of Clifton, in marriage with Elianor, only daughter of Gilbert D'Engayne, whose family had held it from the time of Henry II. It has ever since continued the seat and residence of their descendants. In Cromwell's days the Wyberghs had the honour to be considered delinquents; and in the succeeding century, in 1715, the head of the house was taken prisoner in consequence of his allegiance to the house of Hanover.

In the thirty-eighth year of King Edward III's reign, William de Wybergh from Saint Bee's in Cumberland inherited the manor of Clifton after marrying Elianor, the only daughter of Gilbert D'Engayne, whose family had owned it since the time of Henry II. Since then, it has remained the home of their descendants. During Cromwell's time, the Wyberghs were viewed as delinquents, and in the following century, in 1715, the head of the family was captured due to his loyalty to the house of Hanover.

Younger Branch. Lawson of Brayton, Baronet 1831.

Younger Branch. Lawson of Brayton, Baronet 1831.

See Burn's Westmorland, vol. i. p. 417.

See Burn's Westmorland, vol. i. p. 417.

Arms.—Sable, three bars or, in chief two estoiles of the last. Sometimes I find two mullets in chief, and one in base, used in place of the estoiles.

Coat of Arms.—Black, featuring three gold bars and two gold stars at the top. Occasionally, I notice two stars at the top and one at the bottom instead of the other stars.

Present Representative, William Wybergh, Esq.

Present Representative, William Wybergh, Esq.





WILTSHIRE.

Knightly.

Seymour of Maiden-Bradley; Duke of Somerset 1546-7, Baronet 1611.

arms_page283.jpg

This great historical family is of Norman origin, descended from Roger de Seimor, or Seymour, who lived in the reign of Henry I. Woundy, Penhow, and Seymour Castle, all in the county of Monmouth, (the last sold in the reign of Henry VIII.,) were ancient seats of the family, who we find in the fourteenth century resident in Somersetshire, after the marriage of Sir Roger Seymour with the coheiress of Beauchamp of Hache; his grandson married the heiress of Esturmi or Sturmey of Chadham, in this county, and thus first became connected with Wiltshire. Maiden-Bradley belonged to Sir Edward Seymour, the elder, the eldest surviving son of the Protector Somerset by his first wife, and the ancestor of the present family, who in 1750, on the death of the seventh Duke of Somerset, succeeded to the Dukedom, which by special entail went first to the descendants of the Protector by his second wife, until the extinction of her male line in that year.

This notable historical family has Norman roots, descended from Roger de Seimor, or Seymour, who lived during the reign of Henry I. Woundy, Penhow, and Seymour Castle, all located in Monmouthshire (the last was sold during the reign of Henry VIII), were ancient homes of the family. In the fourteenth century, they were settled in Somersetshire after Sir Roger Seymour married the coheiress of Beauchamp of Hache. His grandson married the heiress of Esturmi or Sturmey of Chadham in this county, thus establishing a connection with Wiltshire. Maiden-Bradley was owned by Sir Edward Seymour, the elder, the oldest surviving son of the Protector Somerset by his first wife, and the ancestor of the current family. In 1750, following the death of the seventh Duke of Somerset, they inherited the Dukedom, which, by special entail, had first gone to the descendants of the Protector by his second wife, until her male line became extinct that year.

Younger Branches. Seymour, of Knoyle, in this county, descended from Francis, next brother of Edward eighth Duke of Somerset, and second son of Sir Edward Seymour, Baronet, of Maiden-Bradley, who died in 1741. Seymour Marquess of Hertford, (1793,) descended from Francis, son of Sir Edward Seymour, Bart., who died in 1708, and his second wife, Letitia, daughter of Francis Popham.

Younger Branches. Seymour, of Knoyle, in this county, is a descendant of Francis, the next brother of Edward, the eighth Duke of Somerset, and the second son of Sir Edward Seymour, Baronet, of Maiden-Bradley, who passed away in 1741. Seymour, Marquess of Hertford, (1793), is descended from Francis, the son of Sir Edward Seymour, Bart., who died in 1708, and his second wife, Letitia, the daughter of Francis Popham.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. i. p. 144, vol. ii. p. 560; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 479; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 86.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. i. p. 144, vol. ii. p. 560; Westcote's Devonshire Pedigrees, p. 479; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 86.

Arms.—Quarterly, 1 and 4, Or, on a pile gules between six fleurs-de-lis azure three lions of England; 2 and 3, Gules, two wings conjoined in lure of the first, the points downwards. The wings, the original coat, was borne by Sir Roger de Seimor in the 23rd Henry III., as appears by his seal, with the legend "Sigill' Rogeri de Seimor." (Collins.) The first quarter was granted by Henry VIII. as an augmentation in consequence of his marrying Jane, daughter of Sir John Seymour.

Coat of Arms.—Divided into four parts, 1 and 4: Gold background, with a red triangle featuring six blue fleurs-de-lis and three lions representing England; 2 and 3: Red background, displaying two joined wings in the same color, pointing downwards. The wings, which are from the original coat, were used by Sir Roger de Seimor in the 23rd year of Henry III, as evidenced by his seal that reads "Sigill' Rogeri de Seimor." (Collins.) The first quarter was granted by Henry VIII as an upgrade due to his marriage to Jane, the daughter of Sir John Seymour.

Present Representative, Edward Adolphus Seymour, K.G. 13th Duke of Somerset.

Present Representative, Edward Adolphus Seymour, K.G., 13th Duke of Somerset.





Arundell of Wardour, Baron Arundell of Wardour 1605.

arms_page284.jpg

A Norman family, which for centuries has flourished in the West of England, traced by Dugdale to "Rogerius Arundel," mentioned in Domesday. "The most diligent inspection, however," writes Hoare in his Wiltshire, "of an immense collection of ancient charters, deeds, and instruments of all kinds, and from the earliest periods of documentary evidence, among the archives of Wardour Castle, have not enabled us to trace the filiation of this House from the said Rogerius." Reinfred de Arundell, who lived at the end of the reign of Henry III. stands therefore at the head of the pedigree as given by Hoare. Gilbert in his "Survey of Cornwall," is inclined to believe the name to be derived from Arundel in Sussex, and refers to "Yorke's Union of Honour." He says the family came into Cornwall by a match with the heiress of Trembleth about the middle of the twelfth century. Lanherne, in that county, was in the fourteenth century their principal seat. The Castle of Wardour was purchased by Sir Thomas Arundell from Sir Fulke Greville in 1547.

A Norman family that has thrived in the West of England for centuries is traced by Dugdale to "Rogerius Arundel," who is mentioned in the Domesday Book. "Despite our thorough examination," writes Hoare in his Wiltshire, "of a vast collection of ancient charters, deeds, and various documents, from the earliest periods of recorded history, among the archives of Wardour Castle, we haven't been able to trace the lineage of this House from the aforementioned Rogerius." Reinfred de Arundell, who lived at the end of Henry III's reign, is therefore at the beginning of the family tree as stated by Hoare. Gilbert, in his "Survey of Cornwall," tends to think the name comes from Arundel in Sussex and cites "Yorke's Union of Honour." He mentions that the family arrived in Cornwall through a marriage with the heiress of Trembleth around the mid-twelfth century. Lanherne, in that county, was their main residence in the fourteenth century. The Castle of Wardour was bought by Sir Thomas Arundell from Sir Fulke Greville in 1547.

Camden, Carew, and Leland unite in recording the hospitality and honourable demeanour of this family, in all relations of social life, and state that from the pre-eminence of their ample possessions they were popularly designated "The Great Arundells."

Camden, Carew, and Leland come together to document the hospitality and respectable behavior of this family in all aspects of social life, noting that due to their significant wealth, they were commonly referred to as "The Great Arundells."

See Coll. Topog. et Genealog., vol. iii. p. 389; Leland's Itin., vol. iii. fol. 2; Gilbert's Cornwall, vol. i. p. 470; Brydges's Collins, vol. vii. p. 40; and Hoare's Wiltshire, vol. iii. pt. i. p. 175, &c.

See Coll. Topog. et Genealog., vol. iii. p. 389; Leland's Itin., vol. iii. fol. 2; Gilbert's Cornwall, vol. i. p. 470; Brydges's Collins, vol. vii. p. 40; and Hoare's Wiltshire, vol. iii. pt. i. p. 175, &c.

Arms.—Sable, six martlets argent. The martlets, or hirondelles, may be considered an early instance of Canting Heraldry.

Coat of Arms.—Black background with six white martlets. The martlets, or swallows, represent an early example of pun-based heraldry.

Present Representative, John Francis Arundell, 12th Baron Arundell of Wardour.

Present Representative, John Francis Arundell, 12th Baron Arundell of Wardour.





Wyndham of Dinton.

arms_page286.jpg

The sole remaining branch in the male line of this ancient family, said to be of Saxon origin, and descended from "Ailwardus" of Wymondham, or Wyndham, in Norfolk, living soon after the Norman Conquest. Felbrigge, in the same county, was for many ages the seat of the Wyndhams, and afterwards Orchard, in Somersetshire, which came from the co-heiress of Sydenham. The present family, who succeeded to the representation on the death of the fourth and last Earl of Egremont, in 1845, descend from Sir Wadham, ninth son of Sir John Wyndham, of Orchard and Felbrigge. They were seated at Norrington, in this county, about 1660. Dinton was purchased in 1689.

The only remaining branch in the male line of this ancient family, believed to be of Saxon origin and descended from "Ailwardus" of Wymondham, or Wyndham, in Norfolk, who lived soon after the Norman Conquest. Felbrigge, in the same county, was the home of the Wyndhams for many years, and later Orchard, in Somerset, which came from the co-heiress of Sydenham. The current family, who took over the family line after the death of the fourth and last Earl of Egremont in 1845, descends from Sir Wadham, the ninth son of Sir John Wyndham of Orchard and Felbrigge. They settled at Norrington in this county around 1660. Dinton was bought in 1689.

See Parkins's Continuation of Blomefield's Norfolk, vol. iv. p. 309; Hoare's Wiltshire, vol. iii. pt. i. 108, and vol. iv. p. 93; Hutchins's History of Dorset, vol. iii. p. 330; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 346; and Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 401.

See Parkins's Continuation of Blomefield's Norfolk, vol. iv. p. 309; Hoare's Wiltshire, vol. iii. pt. i. 108, and vol. iv. p. 93; Hutchins's History of Dorset, vol. iii. p. 330; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 346; and Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 401.

Arms.—Azure, a chevron between three lion's heads erased or.

Arms.—Blue, a chevron between three silver lion's heads.

Present Representative, William Wyndham, Esq.

Present Rep, William Wyndham, Esq.





Malet of Wilbury, Baronet 1791.

arms_page287.jpg

A noble Norman family of great antiquity, who were of Baronial rank immediately after the Conquest, descended from William Baron Malet, whose grandson, another William Baron Malet, was expelled by Henry I. The elder branch of the family were long seated at Enmore, in the county of Somerset; but the ancestors of the present family, whose baronetcy was conferred for services in the East Indies, at Corypole and Wolleigh, in the county of Devon, and at Pointington and St. Audries, in Somersetshire. Wilbury was purchased in 1803.

A noble Norman family with deep roots, who held Baronial rank right after the Conquest, descended from William Baron Malet. His grandson, also named William Baron Malet, was expelled by Henry I. The elder branch of the family was long established in Enmore, Somerset. However, the ancestors of the current family, who received their baronetcy for services in the East Indies, were based in Corypole and Wolleigh in Devon, as well as Pointington and St. Audries in Somerset. Wilbury was purchased in 1803.

See Hoare's Modern Wiltshire, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 106; Collinson's History of Somersetshire, vol. i. p. 90; and the Gentleman's Magazine for 1799, p. 117.

See Hoare's Modern Wiltshire, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 106; Collinson's History of Somersetshire, vol. i. p. 90; and the Gentleman's Magazine for 1799, p. 117.

Arms.—Azure, three escallops or. Robert Malet bore Argent, three fermaux sable, in the reign of Edward I. as appears by Sir R. St. George's Roll, Harl. MS. 6137.

Coat of Arms.—Blue field with three gold scallop shells. Robert Malet bore Silver field with three black ferrets during the reign of Edward I, as recorded in Sir R. St. George's Roll, Harl. MS. 6137.

Present Representative, Sir Alexander Charles Malet, 2nd Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Alexander Charles Malet, 2nd Baronet.





Gentle.

Codrington of Wroughton.

arms_page288.jpg

The name is local, from Codrington, in the parish of' Wapley, in the county of Gloucester, where this family was seated as early as the reign of Henry IV. John Codrington, Esquire, Standard-bearer to Henry V. in his wars in France, was the direct ancestor; he died in 1475, at the age, it is said, of 112; his monument remains at Wapley.

The name comes from Codrington, in the parish of Wapley, in Gloucestershire, where this family has been established since the reign of Henry IV. John Codrington, Esquire, who served as Standard-bearer to Henry V. during his campaigns in France, is a direct ancestor. He died in 1475 at what is said to be the age of 112; his monument still exists in Wapley.

Codrington remained in the family till 1753, when it passed with an heiress to the Bamfyldes of Poltimore, and has since been re-purchased by the present owner of Dodington. Didmarton, also in Gloucestershire, which came by marriage in 1570, and was afterwards sold, and latterly Wroughton, in this county, became the family seats.

Codrington stayed in the family until 1753, when it was inherited by an heiress who passed it to the Bamfyldes of Poltimore. It has since been bought back by the current owner of Dodington. Didmarton, also in Gloucestershire, became part of the family through marriage in 1570 and was later sold. Eventually, Wroughton in this county became the family homes.

Two younger branches have been seated at Dodington; the first, descended from Thomas Codrington, brother of John the Standard-bearer, long settled at Frampton-on-Severn in Gloucestershire, bought Dodington in the time of Queen Elizabeth and sold it at the beginning of the eighteenth century to the ancestor of the present family, Codrington of Dodington, in the county of Gloucester, Baronet 1721, descended from Christopher, second son of Robert Codrington, who died in 1618.

Two younger branches have settled at Dodington; the first, descended from Thomas Codrington, brother of John the Standard-bearer, who had long been established at Frampton-on-Severn in Gloucestershire, purchased Dodington during the reign of Queen Elizabeth and sold it at the beginning of the eighteenth century to the ancestor of the current family, Codrington of Dodington, in the county of Gloucester, Baronet 1721, descended from Christopher, the second son of Robert Codrington, who passed away in 1618.

See Atkyns's Gloucestershire, pp. 204 and 391; Rudder's Gloucestershire, p. 787; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iv. p. 201. Corrected by the information of Mr. R. H. Codrington.

See Atkyns's Gloucestershire, pp. 204 and 391; Rudder's Gloucestershire, p. 787; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iv. p. 201. Corrected by the information of Mr. R. H. Codrington.

Arms.—Argent, a fess embattled counter-embattled sable, fretty gules, between three lioncels passant of the third. The fretty is sometimes omitted by the present Dodington branch. The ancient coat was simply, Argent, a fess between three lioncels passant gules, still used by the former family of Dodington, now settled in Somersetshire. The embattlement and fret was an augmentation granted to the Standard-bearer in the 19th of Henry VI.; and again two years before he died he received a further acknowledgement of his support of the Red Rose in a coat to be borne quarterly, Vert, on a bend argent three roses gules, in the sinister quarter a dexter hand couped of the second.

Arms.—Silver background, a bold black band with battlements, decorated with red patterns, alongside three golden little lions walking. The decorative patterns are sometimes omitted by the current Dodington family. The original coat simply stated, Silver, a band between three little lions walking red, which is still used by the former Dodington family, now located in Somerset. The battlements and patterns were added as an enhancement given to the Standard-bearer in the 19th year of Henry VI.; and again, two years before his death, he received further recognition for his support of the Red Rose in a coat displayed quarterly, Green, with a diagonal silver stripe featuring three red roses, and in the left quarter a silver hand cut off.

Present Representative, William Wyndham Codrington, Esq.

Present Representative, William Wyndham Codrington, Esq.





Thynne of Longleate, Marquess of Bath 1789; Viscount Weymouth 1682; Baronet 1641.

arms_page289.jpg

The name is derived from the mansion or inn at Stretton, in the county of Salop, to which the freehold lands of the family, with various detached copyholds, were attached. The original name was Botfield, so called from Botfield in Stretton; the first on record being William de Bottefeld, sub-forester of Shirlet, in Shropshire, in 1255. About the time of Edward IV. the elder line of the family assumed the name of Thynne, otherwise Botfeld, which was borne for three generations before the time of Sir John Thynne, the purchaser of Longleate, who died in 1580, the ancestor of the present family.

The name comes from the mansion or inn at Stretton, in Shropshire, which was connected to the family’s freehold lands and several detached copyholds. The original name was Botfield, named after Botfield in Stretton; the first recorded mention is William de Bottefeld, sub-forester of Shirlet, in Shropshire, in 1255. Around the time of Edward IV, the older branch of the family took on the name Thynne, also known as Botfeld, which was used for three generations before Sir John Thynne, who bought Longleate and died in 1580, becoming the ancestor of the current family.

Younger Branch represented by the late Beriah Botfield of Norton Hall, in the county of Northampton, and Decker Hill, co. Salop, descended from John, second son of Thomas Bottefeld, of Bottefeld, living in 1439.

Younger Branch represented by the late Beriah Botfield of Norton Hall, in Northamptonshire, and Decker Hill, in Shropshire, is descended from John, the second son of Thomas Bottefeld, of Bottefeld, who was alive in 1439.

See the Topographer and Genealogist, vol. iii. p. 468; and the Stemmata Botevilliana, (privately printed,) second edition, 1858, 4to.

See the Topographer and Genealogist, vol. iii. p. 468; and the Stemmata Botevilliana, (privately printed,) second edition, 1858, 4to.

Arms.—Barry of ten or and sable. The younger branch, who retained the name of Botfield, bore Barry of twelve or and sable.

Arms.—Gold and black stripes. The younger branch that retained the name Botfield displayed gold and black stripes in twelve segments.

Present Representative, John Alexander Thynne, 4th Marquess of Bath.

Present Representative, John Alexander Thynne, 4th Marquess of Bath.





WORCESTERSHIRE.

Knightly.

Acton of Wolverton.

arms_page291.jpg

A junior branch of a very ancient family, said indeed by Habington, the Worcestershire antiquary, to be of Saxon origin, and formerly seated at Acton, properly Oakton, in the parish of Ombersley. Elias de Acton, of Ombersley, occurs in the third of Henry III. He was the ancestor of various branches of the Actons resident in different parts of this county, at Sutton, Ribbesford, Elmley-Lovet, Bokelton, and Burton, all of whom now appear to be extinct, the male line being preserved by the present family, founded by a younger son of Sir Roger Acton, of Sutton, and the heiress of Cokesey, about the middle of the seventeenth century.

A junior branch of a very old family, said by Habington, the Worcestershire historian, to be of Saxon descent, and previously based at Acton, or more accurately Oakton, in the parish of Ombersley. Elias de Acton from Ombersley is mentioned during the reign of Henry III. He was the ancestor of several branches of the Actons living in different parts of this county, at Sutton, Ribbesford, Elmley-Lovet, Bokelton, and Burton, all of which now seem to be extinct, with the male line continued by the current family, founded by a younger son of Sir Roger Acton from Sutton, and the heiress of Cokesey, around the middle of the seventeenth century.

See Nash's History of Worcestershire, vol. ii. p. 217; and Blakeway's Sheriffs of Salop, p. 60.

See Nash's History of Worcestershire, vol. ii. p. 217; and Blakeway's Sheriffs of Salop, p. 60.

Arms.—Gules, a fess within a border engrailed ermine.

Arms.—Red, with a band featuring a wavy border made of fur.

Present Representative, William Joseph Acton, Esq.

Present Representative, William Joseph Acton, Esq.





Lyttleton of Frankley, Baron Lyttleton 1794; Irish Baron 1776; Baronet 1618.

arms_page292.jpg

The name is derived from a place in the Vale of Evesham, where the ancestors of this family in the female line were seated before the reign of Richard I. Frankley came from an heiress of that name in the reign of Henry III. In that of Henry V. Elizabeth, heiress of Sir Thomas Lyttleton, of Frankley, married Thomas Westcote of Westcote, in the county of Devon, Esquire, "but the old knight, her father, desirous to perpetuate his name, (and his purpose failed not,) would not yield consent to the marriage but upon his son's-in-law assured promise that his son, enjoying his mother's inheritance, should also take her name, and continue it, which was justly performed." (Westcote's Devonshire, p. 306.)

The name comes from a place in the Vale of Evesham, where the ancestors of this family through the female line lived before the reign of Richard I. Frankley was passed down from a heiress of that name during the reign of Henry III. In the time of Henry V, Elizabeth, the heiress of Sir Thomas Lyttleton of Frankley, married Thomas Westcote of Westcote in Devon, Esquire. However, her father, the old knight, eager to keep his name going (and he succeeded), wouldn’t agree to the marriage unless his son-in-law promised that his son would inherit his mother’s property and also take her name, which was indeed fulfilled. (Westcote's Devonshire, p. 306.)

Hagley, the principal seat, was purchased in 1564. Mr. John Lyttleton, the head of this family, was implicated in Lord Essex's rising in 1600; but his son, Sir Thomas, was right loyal to the Crown in 1642.

Hagley, the main residence, was bought in 1564. Mr. John Lyttleton, the leader of this family, was involved in Lord Essex's uprising in 1600; however, his son, Sir Thomas, remained loyal to the Crown in 1642.

See Leland's Itinerary in Coll. Topog. et Genealog., vol. iii. p. 339; Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. p. 493; Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1701, p. 583; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 306; and Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 316. See also in the Library of the Society of Antiquaries a genealogical account of this family, in the handwriting of Dr. Charles Lyttleton, Bishop of Carlisle, No. 151, 4to.

See Leland's Itinerary in Coll. Topog. et Genealog., vol. iii. p. 339; Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. p. 493; Prince's Worthies of Devon, ed. 1701, p. 583; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 306; and Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 316. Also, check the Library of the Society of Antiquaries for a genealogical account of this family written by Dr. Charles Lyttleton, Bishop of Carlisle, No. 151, 4to.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three escallops sable, borne by Thomas Lyttelton in the reign of Henry IV. as appears by his seal.

Arms.—Silver, with a chevron between three black scallop shells, used by Thomas Lyttelton during the reign of Henry IV, as indicated by his seal.

Present Representative, George William Lyttleton, 4th Lord Lyttleton.

Present Representative, George William Lyttleton, 4th Lord Lyttleton.





Talbot of Grafton, Earl of Shrewsbury 1442; Earl Talbot 1784; Baron 1733; Earl of Waterford in Ireland 1661.

arms_page293.jpg

This great historical family is traced to the Conquest, Richard Talbot, living at that period, being the first recorded ancestor. No family in England is more connected with the history of our country than this noble race; few are more highly allied. The Marches of Wales appear to be the original seat; afterwards we find the Talbots in Shropshire, in Staffordshire, (where their estates were inherited from the Verdons in the time of the Edwards,) and lastly in Yorkshire, at Sheffield, derived from the great heiress of Neville Lord Furnival. This was the seat of the first seven Earls of Shrewsbury, of whom an excellent biographical account will be found in Hunter's Hallamshire (p. 43). The manor of Grafton, formerly the estate of the Staffords, was granted by Henry VII. to Sir Gilbert Talbot in 1486; it afterwards became the seat of a younger branch, who eventually, on the death of the eighth Earl, became Earls of Shrewsbury, from whom all the succeeding Earls, to the decease of Bertram Arthur, 17th Earl of Shrewsbury, in 1856, were descended. The present and 18th Earl, who is also the 3rd Earl Talbot, springs from the second marriage of Sir John Talbot of Albrighton in Shropshire, and of Grafton, in this county, who died in 1550, and who was grandfather of the 9th and ancestor of the succeeding Earls.

This prominent historical family traces its roots back to the Conquest, with Richard Talbot as the first recorded ancestor from that time. No family in England is more intertwined with the history of our country than this noble lineage; few are more distinguished. The original seat seems to be in the Marches of Wales; later, the Talbots are found in Shropshire and Staffordshire (where they inherited their estates from the Verdons during the era of the Edwards) and eventually in Yorkshire, at Sheffield, through the great heiress of Neville Lord Furnival. This was the home of the first seven Earls of Shrewsbury, and an excellent biographical account can be found in Hunter's Hallamshire (p. 43). The manor of Grafton, which was previously the estate of the Staffords, was granted by Henry VII. to Sir Gilbert Talbot in 1486; it later became the residence of a younger branch, who ultimately became Earls of Shrewsbury upon the death of the eighth Earl. All subsequent Earls, up until the death of Bertram Arthur, the 17th Earl of Shrewsbury, in 1856, were descended from this branch. The current and 18th Earl, who is also the 3rd Earl Talbot, comes from the second marriage of Sir John Talbot of Albrighton in Shropshire and Grafton in this county, who died in 1550 and was the grandfather of the 9th Earl and ancestor of the later Earls.

Younger Branch. Talbot, Baron Talbot of Malahide in Ireland, (1831,) descended from Richard, second son of Richard Talbot and Maud Montgomery, the third ancestor of the House of Shrewsbury, who was living in 1153.

Younger Branch. Talbot, Baron Talbot of Malahide in Ireland, (1831,) is descended from Richard, the second son of Richard Talbot and Maud Montgomery, the third ancestor of the House of Shrewsbury, who was alive in 1153.

See Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. p. 158; Brydges's Collins, vol. iii. p. i.; and the Shrewsbury Peerage Claim before the House of Lords, 1857.

See Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. p. 158; Brydges's Collins, vol. iii. p. i.; and the Shrewsbury Peerage Claim before the House of Lords, 1857.

Arms.—Gules, a lion rampant within a border engrailed or. Borne by Sir Gilbert Talbot in the reign of Edward II. (Rolls), and said to be the coat of Rhese ap Griffith, Prince of South Wales. The ancient arms of Talbot being Bendy of ten argent and gules. The Talbots of Malahide bear the border erminoise instead of or.

Coat of Arms.—Red, with a lion standing upright inside a notched gold border. This was carried by Sir Gilbert Talbot during the reign of Edward II. (Rolls), and is thought to be the coat of Rhese ap Griffith, Prince of South Wales. The original arms of Talbot are striped in ten alternating silver and red. The Talbots of Malahide show the border in ermine instead of gold.

Present Representative, Henry John Chetwynd Talbot, 18th Earl of Shrewsbury, and third Earl Talbot.

Present Representative, Henry John Chetwynd Talbot, 18th Earl of Shrewsbury, and third Earl Talbot.





Winnington of Stanford; Baronet 1755.

arms_page294.jpg

Descended from Paul Winnington, living in 1615, great-grandson of Robert, who was son of Thomas Winnington of the Birches, in the county of Chester, living in the reign of Henry VII. This Thomas represented a younger branch of the Winningtons, of Winnington, in the same county, descended from Robert, son of Lidulfus de Croxton, who took the name of Winnington in the reign of Edward I., on his marriage with Margery, daughter and heiress of Robert de Winnington, living in the fifty-sixth of Henry III. Stanford, formerly the seat of the Salways, came to the Winningtons in the early part of the reign of Charles II., on the marriage of Sir Francis Wilmington and Elizabeth Salway.

Descended from Paul Winnington, living in 1615, great-grandson of Robert, who was the son of Thomas Winnington of the Birches, in the county of Chester, during the reign of Henry VII. This Thomas represented a younger branch of the Winningtons from Winnington, in the same county, descended from Robert, son of Lidulfus de Croxton, who adopted the name Winnington in the reign of Edward I., after marrying Margery, daughter and heiress of Robert de Winnington, who was alive during the fifty-sixth year of Henry III. Stanford, formerly the home of the Salways, became part of the Winningtons in the early part of the reign of Charles II., when Sir Francis Wilmington married Elizabeth Salway.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, vol. ii. p. 112, vol. iii. pp. 74 and 93; Pedigree privately printed by Sir Thomas Phillipps, from an original MS. penes Sir Thomas Winnington, Bart.; and Nash's Worcestershire, vol. ii. p. 368.

See Ormerod's Cheshire, vol. ii. p. 112, vol. iii. pp. 74 and 93; Pedigree privately printed by Sir Thomas Phillipps, from an original MS. penes Sir Thomas Winnington, Bart.; and Nash's Worcestershire, vol. ii. p. 368.

Arms.—Argent, an inescucheon voided, within an orle of martlets sable.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, a hollow shield edged with a border of black martlets.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas Edward Winnington, M.P. for Bewdley, 4th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas Edward Winnington, Member of Parliament for Bewdley, 4th Baronet.





Noel of Bell-Hall.

arms_page295.jpg

This is the only remaining branch in the male line of the very ancient family of Noel; of which the Earls of Gainsborough, created 1681, extinct 1798, represented a junior line. William, the ancestor of all the Noels, was living in the reign of Henry I., and was at that period Lord of Ellenhall, in the county of Stafford. In the time of Henry II., either he or his son founded the Priory of Raunton, in the same county.

This is the only remaining branch of the male line of the very old family of Noel; the Earls of Gainsborough, who were created in 1681 and became extinct in 1798, were from a younger line. William, the ancestor of all the Noels, lived during the reign of Henry I and was the Lord of Ellenhall in Staffordshire at that time. During the reign of Henry II, either he or his son established the Priory of Raunton in the same county.

From the Noels of Ellenhall descended a branch of the family seated at Hilcote, in Staffordshire; an estate which remained with them until recent times; the father of the present representative, who was son of Walter Noel, of Hilcote, Esq., having removed to Bell-Hall, in the parish of Bell-Broughton, in this county.

From the Noels of Ellenhall came a branch of the family that settled at Hilcote in Staffordshire; an estate that stayed with them until recent times. The father of the current representative, who was the son of Walter Noel of Hilcote, Esq., moved to Bell-Hall in the parish of Bell-Broughton in this county.

The Noels of Rutlandshire and Leicestershire were also descended from the house of Ellenhall.

The Noels from Rutlandshire and Leicestershire were also descended from the house of Ellenhall.

See Harwood's edition of Erdeswick's Staffordshire, 1844, p. 132 and Blore's Rutlandshire.

See Harwood's edition of Erdeswick's Staffordshire, 1844, p. 132 and Blore's Rutlandshire.

Arms.—Or, fretty gules, a canton ermine.

Coat of Arms.—Gold, featuring a red fretty design and a black-and-white checkered corner.

Present Representative, Charles Noel, Esq.

Present Representative, Charles Noel, Esq.





Gentle.

Lechmere of Hanley; Baronet 1818.

arms_page296.jpg

A family of great antiquity, said to have migrated from the Low Countries, and to have received a grant of land called "Lechmere's Field," in Hanley, from William the Conqueror. The first in the pedigree is Reginald de Lechm'e de Hanlee, mentioned in a deed without date. He was father of Adam de Lechmere, who married Isabella, and was the ancestor of this venerable house, whose ancient seat at Severn-End, in Hanley, with the exception of a period of thirty years, has ever since remained in the family. During the civil wars the Lechmeres were on the side of the Parliament. A second son, who died without issue in 1727, was raised to the Peerage in 1721.

A family with deep roots, believed to have moved from the Low Countries, obtained a land grant known as "Lechmere's Field" in Hanley from William the Conqueror. The earliest ancestor recorded is Reginald de Lechm'e de Hanlee, mentioned in an undated document. He was the father of Adam de Lechmere, who married Isabella and became the forefather of this respected family, whose historic residence at Severn-End in Hanley has, apart from a thirty-year gap, always been in the family. During the civil wars, the Lechmeres supported Parliament. A second son, who died without children in 1727, was elevated to the Peerage in 1721.

Younger Branches. Lechmere of Steeple-Aston, in the county of Oxford, and Lechmere of Fanhope, in the county of Hereford; also the Lechmeres (called Patteshalls) of Allensmore, in the same county; the two last being descended from Sandys, second son of Sir Nicholas Lechmere, the Judge, who died in 1701.

Younger Branches. Lechmere of Steeple-Aston, in Oxfordshire, and Lechmere of Fanhope, in Herefordshire; also the Lechmeres (known as Patteshalls) of Allensmore, in the same county; the last two being descendants of Sandys, the second son of Sir Nicholas Lechmere, the Judge, who passed away in 1701.

See Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. p. 563.

See Nash's Worcestershire, vol. 1, p. 563.

Arms.—Gules, a fess and in chief two pelicans or, vulning themselves proper.

Arms.—Red background with a horizontal band, and above it, two gold pelicans naturally wounding themselves.

Present Representative, Sir Edmund Anthony Harley Lechmere, 3rd Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Edmund Anthony Harley Lechmere, 3rd Baronet.





Sebright of Besford; Baronet 1626.

arms_page297.jpg

William Sebright, of Sebright, in Much Beddow, in Essex, living in the reign of Henry II. is the ancestor of this ancient family, who removed into this county at a very early period, apparently after the marriage of Mabel Sebright with Katharine, daughter and heir of Ralph Cowper, of Blakeshall, in the parish of Wolverly, in which parish the Sebrights possessed lands in the sixth year of Edward I. Besford was purchased about the reign of Elizabeth.

William Sebright, from Sebright in Much Beddow, Essex, lived during the reign of Henry II and is the ancestor of this long-standing family. They moved to this county quite early on, likely after Mabel Sebright married Katharine, the daughter and heir of Ralph Cowper from Blakeshall, located in the parish of Wolverly. The Sebrights owned land in that parish during the sixth year of Edward I. Besford was acquired around the reign of Elizabeth.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. ii. p. 8; and Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. p. 78.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. ii. p. 8; and Nash's Worcestershire, vol. i. p. 78.

Arms.—Argent, three cinquefoils pierced sable.

Arms.—Silver, three black cinquefoils.

Present Representative, Sir John Gage Saunders Sebright, 9th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir John Gage Saunders Sebright, 9th Baronet.





Boughton of Rouse-Lench; Baronet 1641.

arms_page298.jpg

This is a Warwickshire family of good antiquity, traced to Robert de Boreton, grandfather of William, who lived in the reign of Edward III. In that of Henry VI. by the heiress of Allesley, the family became possessed of the manor of Lawford, which remained their residence till the murder of Sir Theodosius Boughton, Baronet, by his brother-in-law Mr. Donnellan, in 1781. After that event, a younger branch succeeding to the estate and title, Lawford Hall was pulled down, and the ninth Baronet, on inheriting the property of the Rouses of Rouse-Lench, in this county, assumed that name, and made it his seat and residence.

This is a Warwickshire family with a long history, tracing back to Robert de Boreton, the grandfather of William, who lived during the reign of Edward III. During the reign of Henry VI, through the heiress of Allesley, the family acquired the manor of Lawford, which remained their home until the murder of Sir Theodosius Boughton, Baronet, by his brother-in-law Mr. Donnellan in 1781. After that incident, a younger branch took over the estate and title, Lawford Hall was demolished, and the ninth Baronet, upon inheriting the property of the Rouses of Rouse-Lench in this county, adopted that name and made it his home.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, second ed., vol. i. p. 98; Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iv. pt. i. p. 202; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. ii. p. 220.

See Dugdale's Warwickshire, 2nd ed., vol. i. p. 98; Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iv. pt. i. p. 202; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. ii. p. 220.

Arms.—Sable, three crescents or.

Arms.—Black, three gold crescents.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Henry Rouse Boughton, 11th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Charles Henry Rouse Boughton, 11th Baronet.





YORKSHIRE.

Knightly.

Fitzwilliam of Wentworth House; Earl Fitzwilliam 1746; Baron of Ireland 1620.

arms_page299.jpg

William FitzGodric, who married Albreda de Lizours, Lady of Sprotsborough, in this county, and who died before 1195, is the remote ancestor of this ancient house. Their son, William FitzWilliam, was seated at Sprotsborough in the reign of Henry II., and here the family continued till the extinction of the elder line, which ended in coheiresses in the reign of Henry VIII.

William FitzGodric, who married Albreda de Lizours, Lady of Sprotsborough, in this county, and who died before 1195, is the distant ancestor of this ancient family. Their son, William FitzWilliam, lived in Sprotsborough during the reign of Henry II., and the family remained there until the younger branch faded out, which concluded with coheiresses in the reign of Henry VIII.

The rise of this branch of the family must be ascribed to Sir William Fitzwilliam, Lord Justice, and afterwards Lord Deputy of Ireland, in the reign of Elizabeth, whose grandson was created Baron Fitzwilliam in 1620. In the year 1565, Hugh Fitzwilliam collected whatever evidences could be found touching the descent of the family. This account, which is in the possession of Earl Fitzwilliam, is the foundation of most of the histories of this great family, whose present Yorkshire property came from the Wentworths through the coheiress of the Marquis of Rockingham in 1744. From this match resulted the Earldom in 1746.

The rise of this branch of the family can be attributed to Sir William Fitzwilliam, who served as Lord Justice and later as Lord Deputy of Ireland during Elizabeth's reign. His grandson was made Baron Fitzwilliam in 1620. In 1565, Hugh Fitzwilliam gathered all available evidence regarding the family's lineage. This account, which is held by Earl Fitzwilliam, is the basis for most histories of this prominent family, whose current estate in Yorkshire came from the Wentworths through the coheiress of the Marquis of Rockingham in 1744. This union ultimately led to the Earldom in 1746.

See Hunter's South Yorkshire, vol. i. p. 331, vol. ii. p. 93; and Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 374.

See Hunter's South Yorkshire, vol. i. p. 331, vol. ii. p. 93; and Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 374.

Arms.—Lozengy argent and gules. The present coat, except that ermine takes the place of argent, was borne by Thomas Fitzwilliam in the reign of Henry III. In that of Richard II. William Fitzwilliam bore the arms as at present used.

Arms.—Lozengy silver and red. The present coat, which only differs by having ermine instead of silver, was used by Thomas Fitzwilliam during Henry III's reign. During Richard II's time, William Fitzwilliam used the arms as they are currently displayed.

Present Representative, William Thomas Spencer Wentworth-Fitzwilliam, K.G. 6th Earl Fitzwilliam.

Present Representative, William Thomas Spencer Wentworth-Fitzwilliam, K.G. 6th Earl Fitzwilliam.





Scrope of Danby.

arms_page300.jpg

Few families were more important in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries than the noble house of Scrope; their descent is unbroken from the Conquest. Few houses also have been more distinguished by the number of great offices of honour held both in Church and State. The Scropes were very early settled in Yorkshire, Bolton being, from the period of the reign of Edward I., their principal seat and Barony. The present family is sprung from a younger son of Henry, 6th Lord Scrope of Bolton; it was established at Danby about the middle of the seventeenth century, by marriage with the heiress of Conyers.

Few families were more significant in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries than the noble house of Scrope; their lineage has remained unbroken since the Conquest. This family has also been highly distinguished by the numerous prestigious positions held in both the Church and State. The Scropes settled in Yorkshire quite early, with Bolton being their main residence and Barony since the reign of Edward I. The current family is descended from a younger son of Henry, 6th Lord Scrope of Bolton; they were established at Danby around the middle of the seventeenth century through marriage with the heiress of Conyers.

See Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. i. p. 368; the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll by Sir Harris Nicolas, 1832, vol. ii. p. 1, and Poulett-Scrope's History of Castle-Combe; see also Blore's Rutlandshire, (fol. 1811,) p. 5-8, for full pedigrees of the Scropes of Bolton and Masham, (Yorkshire,) Cockerington, (Lincolnshire,) Wormsleigh or Wormsley, (Oxfordshire,) and Castle-Combe, (Wiltshire,) all now extinct; also the Topographer, vol. iii. p. 181, for Church Notes from Cockerington by Gervase Hollis. Adrian Scrope the Regicide was of the Wormsley branch.

See Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. i. p. 368; the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll by Sir Harris Nicolas, 1832, vol. ii. p. 1, and Poulett-Scrope's History of Castle-Combe; also check Blore's Rutlandshire, (fol. 1811,) p. 5-8, for complete family trees of the Scropes of Bolton and Masham, (Yorkshire,) Cockerington, (Lincolnshire,) Wormsleigh or Wormsley, (Oxfordshire,) and Castle-Combe, (Wiltshire,) all of which are now extinct; also see the Topographer, vol. iii. p. 181, for Church Notes from Cockerington by Gervase Hollis. Adrian Scrope the Regicide was from the Wormsley branch.

Arms.—Azure, a bend or. These arms were confirmed by the Court of Chivalry in 1390, on the celebrated dispute between the houses of Scrope and Grosvenor, as to the right of bearing them. In the reign of Edward III. M. William le Scroope bore the present coat, "en le point de la bend une lyon rampant de purpure." In that of Richard II., M. Henry le Skrop differenced his arms with a label of three points argent, M. Thomas le Scrop at the same period charged his label with an annulet sable, while other members of the family bore the label ermine charged with bars gules, and lozenges and mullets ermine. (Rolls of the dates.)

Coat of Arms.—Blue with a gold diagonal stripe. These arms were officially recognized by the Court of Chivalry in 1390 during the famous dispute between the Scrope and Grosvenor families over the right to use them. During Edward III's reign, Mr. William le Scroope had the current coat featuring "a purple lion rampant on the diagonal stripe." In the time of Richard II, Mr. Henry le Skrop modified his arms with a silver label of three points, while Mr. Thomas le Scrop at the same time added a black ring to his label, and other family members displayed the label in ermine with red stripes, lozenges, and star shapes in ermine. (Rolls of the dates.)

Present Representative, Simon Thomas Scrope, Esq.

Present Representative, Simon Thomas Scrope, Esq.





Grimston of Grimston-Garth.

arms_page301.jpg

Sylvester de Grimston, "Standard-bearer and Chamberlain to William I.," of Grimston, in the parish of Garton, is claimed as the ancestor of this venerable Norman family, who have ever since the period of the Conquest resided at the place from whence the name is derived.

Sylvester de Grimston, "Standard-bearer and Chamberlain to William I," of Grimston, in the parish of Garton, is said to be the ancestor of this respected Norman family, who have lived in the place that gave them their name ever since the time of the Conquest.

Younger branches of the Grimstons were seated in Norfolk and Essex, besides the Grimstons of Gorhambury, Earls of Verulam, all now extinct in the male line.

Younger branches of the Grimstons were located in Norfolk and Essex, alongside the Grimstons of Gorhambury, Earls of Verulam, all of which are now extinct in the male line.

See Poulson's Holderness, vol. ii. p. 60; Clutterbuck's Hertfordshire, vol. i. p. 95; Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 209; and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, vol. ii. p. 292. See also Boutell's Brasses, p. 129, for inscriptions to Sir Edward Grimston and his son in Rishangles Church, near Eye, in Suffolk.

See Poulson's Holderness, vol. ii. p. 60; Clutterbuck's Hertfordshire, vol. i. p. 95; Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 209; and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, vol. ii. p. 292. Also, check out Boutell's Brasses, p. 129, for inscriptions to Sir Edward Grimston and his son in Rishangles Church, near Eye, in Suffolk.

Arms.—Argent, on a fess sable three mullets of six points or, pierced gules. This coat was borne by Monsieur Gerrard de Grymston in the reign of Richard II. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Silver, featuring a black band with three gold five-pointed stars, each with red centers. This coat was used by Mr. Gerrard de Grymston during the reign of Richard II. (Roll.)

Present Representative, Marmaduke Gerard Grimston, Esq.

Present Representative, Marmaduke Gerard Grimston, Esq.





Wyvill of Constable-Burton.

arms_page302.jpg

This ancient Norman family is said to be descended from Sir Humphry de Wyvill, who lived at the time of the Conquest, and whose descendants were seated at Slingsby in this county; the more modern part of the pedigree begins with Robert Wyvill of Ripon, whose son was of Little Burton, in the reign of Henry VIII.; from thence the family migrated to Constable-Burton, about the end of the reign of James I. During the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century, the Wyvills were distinguished by their loyalty and consequent sufferings in the royal cause. An elder line of this family, on whom the Baronetcy, created in 1611, has descended, is said to be resident in Maryland, in the United States of America.

This old Norman family is said to be descended from Sir Humphry de Wyvill, who lived during the time of the Conquest, and whose descendants settled in Slingsby in this county. The more recent part of the family tree starts with Robert Wyvill of Ripon, whose son lived in Little Burton during the reign of Henry VIII. From there, the family moved to Constable-Burton near the end of James I's reign. During the Civil Wars of the seventeenth century, the Wyvills were known for their loyalty and the hardships they faced in support of the royal cause. An older branch of this family, which holds the Baronetcy created in 1611, is said to be living in Maryland, in the United States.

See Leland's Itinerary, vol. iv. pl. i.; Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. i. p. 322; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 232.

See Leland's Itinerary, vol. iv. pl. i.; Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. i. p. 322; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 232.

Arms.—Gules, three chevronels interlaced vaire, and a chief or. The arms are founded upon the coat of Fitz Hugh, and may be taken as a proof of high antiquity.

Coat of Arms.—Red, featuring three interlaced chevron shapes arranged in alternating silver and blue, with a gold shield above. The coat of arms is derived from the Fitz Hugh family and reflects their extensive history.

Present Representative, Marmaduke Wyvill, Esq.

Present Representative, Marmaduke Wyvill, Esq.





Tempest of Broughton.

arms_page303.jpg

The pedigree of this ancient family is traced to Roger, whom Dr. Whitaker calls "Progenitor of this the oldest and most distinguished of the Craven families now surviving. That this man was a Norman the name will not permit us to doubt; that he was a dependant of Roger of Poitou is extremely probable; that he was at all events possessed of Bracewell (in Craven) early in the reign of Henry I., is absolutely certain." Dr. Whitaker proceeds to remark on the name of Tempest, which he says, "whatever was its origin, seems to have been venerated by the family, as in the two next centuries, when local appellation became almost universal, they never chose to part with it." The elder line of the Tempests continued at Bracewell till the time of Charles I., when Richard Tempest, the last representative, pulled down the family house, and devised the estate to a distant relation. The house of Broughton descends directly from Roger, second son of Sir Peirs Tempest, which Roger married in the seventh of Henry IV. Katharine daughter and heir of Peter Gilliott of Broughton, which has been ever since the seat of the Tempests— "a name never stained with dishonour, but often illustrated with deeds of arms."

The family history of this ancient lineage goes back to Roger, whom Dr. Whitaker refers to as "the ancestor of the oldest and most distinguished of the surviving Craven families." There's no doubt that he was a Norman; it’s highly likely he was connected to Roger of Poitou. It's definitely true that he owned Bracewell (in Craven) early in the reign of Henry I. Dr. Whitaker also comments on the name Tempest, noting that "regardless of its origin, it seems to have been cherished by the family, as over the next two centuries, when local names became common, they never chose to abandon it." The main line of the Tempests remained at Bracewell until the time of Charles I, when Richard Tempest, the last family member, dismantled the family home and left the estate to a distant relative. The Broughton family directly descends from Roger, the second son of Sir Peirs Tempest, who married Katharine, the daughter and heir of Peter Gilliott of Broughton, in the seventh year of Henry IV. Broughton has been the seat of the Tempests ever since—"a name never tarnished by dishonor, but often highlighted by acts of valor."

A younger branch was of Tong in this county, descended from Henry, youngest son of Sir Richard Tempest of Bracewell, Sheriff of Yorkshire in the 8th of Henry VIII. created Baronet in 1664, extinct 1819.

A younger branch was of Tong in this county, descended from Henry, youngest son of Sir Richard Tempest of Bracewell, Sheriff of Yorkshire in the 8th of Henry VIII, created Baronet in 1664, extinct 1819.

See Whitaker's Craven, pp. 80, 87.

See Whitaker's Craven, pp. 80, 87.

Arms.—Argent, a bend between six storm finches sable.

Arms.—Silver with a diagonal stripe and six black storm finches.

Present Representative, Charles Henry Tempest, Esq.

Present Representative, Charles Henry Tempest, Esq.





Hamerton of Hellifield Peel.

arms_page304.jpg

One of the most ancient families in the North of England, according to Dr. Whitaker, descended from Richard de Hamerton, who lived in the twenty-sixth of Henry II., anno 1170. From Hamerton, the original seat, the family removed to Hellifield, acquired by marriage with the heiress of Knolle, in the reign of Edward III. The Castle, or Peel, was built in the reign of Henry VII. The Hamertons were engaged in the Northern Rebellion in 1537, and thereby Sir Stephen Hamerton lost his head, and his family the estate; which was restored to the male representative of the family, in the third year of Elizabeth, by a munificent settlement made by John Redman, who had become possessed of the property, and was related by marriage to the Hamertons. A younger branch was of Preston-Jacklyn in this county.

One of the oldest families in the North of England, according to Dr. Whitaker, is descended from Richard de Hamerton, who lived during the twenty-sixth year of Henry II, around 1170. From their original home in Hamerton, the family moved to Hellifield, which they acquired through marriage with the heiress of Knolle during the reign of Edward III. The Castle, or Peel, was built during the reign of Henry VII. The Hamertons were involved in the Northern Rebellion in 1537, resulting in Sir Stephen Hamerton losing his head and his family losing their estate. This estate was restored to the male representative of the family in the third year of Elizabeth through a generous settlement made by John Redman, who acquired the property and was related by marriage to the Hamertons. A younger branch was located in Preston-Jacklyn in this county.

See Whitaker's Craven, ed. 1812, p. 124; and Dugdale's Visitation of Yorkshire, 1665-6, printed by the Surtees Society in 1859, p. 354.

See Whitaker's Craven, ed. 1812, p. 124; and Dugdale's Visitation of Yorkshire, 1665-6, printed by the Surtees Society in 1859, p. 354.

Arms.—Argent, three hammers sable. The Preston-Jacklyn line bore Argent, on a chevron between three hammers sable a trefoil slipped or.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background, three black hammers. The Preston-Jacklyn family had Silver background, on a chevron between three black hammers a gold trefoil.

Present Representative, James Hamerton, Esq.

Present Rep, James Hamerton, Esq.





Hotham of South Dalton; Baron of Ireland 1797; Baronet 1621.

arms_page305.jpg

Peter de Trehouse, who assumed the local name of Hotham, and was living in the year 1188, is the ancestor of this family, who were of Scarborough in this county in the reign of Edward I., a seat which continued the principal residence of the Hothams for several centuries until it went to decay after the Civil Wars in the seventeenth century. The siege of Hull in 1643, when Sir John Hotham was Governor for the Parliament, and with his son was discovered holding correspondence with the Royalists, for which they both suffered death, will ever render this family historical.

Peter de Trehouse, who adopted the local name of Hotham, and was living in 1188, is the ancestor of this family, who were based in Scarborough in this county during the reign of Edward I. This location remained the main residence of the Hothams for several centuries until it fell into disrepair after the Civil Wars in the seventeenth century. The siege of Hull in 1643, when Sir John Hotham was Governor for the Parliament, and he and his son were found to be communicating with the Royalists, leading to both of their executions, will always make this family significant in history.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 473; the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, vol. ii. p. 306; and Oliver's Beverley, p. 509.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 473; the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, vol. ii. p. 306; and Oliver's Beverley, p. 509.

Arms.—Barry of ten argent and azure, on a canton or a raven proper. M. John de Hotham is stated in the Roll of arms of the period of Edward III. to have borne, Or, a bend sable charged with three mullets argent voided gules.

Coat of Arms.—Divided into ten sections, silver and blue, with a gold square that has a black raven. M. John de Hotham is noted in the Roll of Arms from the time of Edward III as having displayed, Gold, with a black diagonal stripe adorned with three silver stars outlined in red.

Present Representative, Beaumont Hotham, 3rd Baron Hotham.

Present Representative, Beaumont Hotham, 3rd Baron Hotham.





Boynton of Barmston, Baronet 1618.

arms_page306.jpg

Bartholomew de Bovington, living at the beginning of the twelfth century, stands at the head of the pedigree; other authorities mention Sir Ingram de Boynton of Aclam, (in Cleveland,) who lived in the reign of Henry III., as the first recorded ancestor. Barmston came from the daughter and coheir of Sir Martyn del See, about the end of the fifteenth century.

Bartholomew de Bovington, who lived at the start of the twelfth century, is at the top of the family tree; other sources refer to Sir Ingram de Boynton of Aclam, (in Cleveland,) who lived during the reign of Henry III., as the first documented ancestor. Barmston is descended from the daughter and co-heir of Sir Martyn del See, around the end of the fifteenth century.

During the Civil Wars, Sir Matthew Boynton, the head of this family, was one of the gentlemen chiefly trusted in Yorkshire by the Parliament.

During the Civil Wars, Sir Matthew Boynton, the leader of this family, was one of the main gentlemen trusted by Parliament in Yorkshire.

See Poulson's History of Holderness, vol. i. p. 196; the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, vol. ii. p. 309; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 301.

See Poulson's History of Holderness, vol. i. p. 196; the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, vol. ii. p. 309; and Wotton's Baronetage, vol. i. p. 301.

Arms.—Or, a fess between three crescents gules. This coat was borne by Monsieur Thomas de Boynton in the reign of Richard II. (Roll.)

Coat of Arms.—Gold, featuring a band with three red crescents. This coat was worn by Monsieur Thomas de Boynton during the reign of Richard II. (Roll.)

Present Representative, Sir Henry Boynton, 10th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Henry Boynton, 10th Baronet.





Waterton of Walton.

arms_page307.jpg

Waterton in the county of Lincoln was the original seat, and from hence the name was derived at an early period. Sir Robert Waterton, Master of the Horse to Henry IV., and John Waterton, who served King Henry V. at Agincourt in the same office, were of this place; the last was succeeded by his brother Sir Robert, who was of Methley in this county, which he inherited with his wife Cicely, the daughter and heir of Robert Fleming, of Woodhall in that parish, and where his tomb is still preserved. This Sir Robert was Govenor of Pontefract Castle during the time that Richard II. was confined there. The present family descend from John Waterton, a younger son of this house, (the male line of the elder branch being extinct,) who married Catherine de Burgh, heiress of Walton, in the year 1435, which has since continued the residence of this ancient knightly lineage.

Waterton in Lincolnshire was the original seat, and this is where the name originated early on. Sir Robert Waterton, Master of the Horse to Henry IV, and John Waterton, who served King Henry V at Agincourt in the same role, were from this area; John was succeeded by his brother Sir Robert, who lived in Methley in this county, which he inherited along with his wife Cicely, the daughter and heir of Robert Fleming of Woodhall in that parish, where his tomb is still maintained. This Sir Robert was Governor of Pontefract Castle when Richard II was held there. The current family descends from John Waterton, a younger son of this house (since the male line of the older branch has died out), who married Catherine de Burgh, heiress of Walton, in 1435, thus continuing the residence of this ancient knightly lineage.

See Whitaker's Leeds, vol. i. p. 269; and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, vol. ii. p. 190, for a memoir of Hugh Waterton, Esq.; and the History of the Isle of Axholme by Archdeacon Stonehouse.

See Whitaker's Leeds, vol. i. p. 269; and the Scrope and Grosvenor Roll, vol. ii. p. 190, for a biography of Hugh Waterton, Esq.; and the History of the Isle of Axholme by Archdeacon Stonehouse.

Arms.—Barry of six ermine and gules, over all three crescents sable.

Arms.—Divided into six sections, alternating between white (ermine) and red (gules), featuring three black crescents positioned above them.

Present Representative, Edmund Waterton, Esq.

Present Rep, Edmund Waterton, Esq.





Fairfax of Steeton.

arms_page308.jpg

"The truly ancient family of Fairfax," as Camden styles it, is supposed to be of Saxon origin, and to have been seated at Torcester in Northumberland at the period of the Conquest. In 1205 (sixth of John,) Richard Fairfax, the first of the family proved by evidence, was possessed of the lands of Ascham, not far from the City of York. His grandson William purchased the Manor of Walton in the West Riding, which continued for near six hundred years, till the extinction of the elder male line of the family in the person of Charles Gregory Fairfax, tenth Viscount Fairfax of Ireland, in 1772, the inheritance of his descendants. From a younger son of Richard Fairfax, of Walton, Chief Justice of England in the reign of Henry VI. the present family is descended, as well as Fairfax of Denton, Baron Fairfax of Cameron in Scotland (1627,) who represents an elder line,* and who resides in the United States of America.

"The truly ancient family of Fairfax," as Camden puts it, is believed to be of Saxon origin and to have been established at Torcester in Northumberland around the time of the Conquest. In 1205 (the sixth year of John’s reign), Richard Fairfax, the first recorded member of the family, owned the lands of Ascham, located not far from the City of York. His grandson William bought the Manor of Walton in the West Riding, which remained in the family for nearly six hundred years, until the elder male line ended with Charles Gregory Fairfax, the tenth Viscount Fairfax of Ireland, in 1772, passing the inheritance to his descendants. The current family descends from a younger son of Richard Fairfax of Walton, who was Chief Justice of England during Henry VI's reign, as well as from Fairfax of Denton, Baron Fairfax of Cameron in Scotland (1627), who represents an older line and currently lives in the United States.

Steeton was the gift of the Chief Justice to Sir Guy Fairfax, his third son, the founder of this branch of the family, and here he erected a castle in 1477.

Steeton was a gift from the Chief Justice to Sir Guy Fairfax, his third son, who started this branch of the family, and here he built a castle in 1477.

See Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, ed. 1754, vol. ii. p. 397.

See Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, ed. 1754, vol. ii. p. 397.

Arms.—Argent, three bars gemelles gules, surmounted by a lion rampant sable, crowned or.

Coat of Arms.—Silver background with three red stripes, topped by a black lion on its hind legs, wearing a gold crown.

Present Representative, Thomas Fairfax, Esq.

Present Rep, Thomas Fairfax, Esq.

* He is descended from the eldest son of Sir William Fairfax of Steeton, who died in 1557.




Norton of Grantley, Baron Grantley 1782.

arms_page309.jpg

The pedigree begins with Egbert Coigniers, whose son Roger was living in the ninth year of Edward II., and was father of another Roger, who marrying the heiress of Norton of Norton, their son took that name; sixth in descent was Richard Norton, who joined with the Earls of Northumberland and Westmerland in the Rebellion of the North in 1569, and thereby caused the destruction of almost every branch of his family. He was attainted in the twelfth of Elizabeth, and died in exile in Spain. The present family descend from Sir Fletcher Norton, Speaker of the House of Commons, descended from Edmund Norton of Clowcroft, third son of old Richard Norton, which Edmund had taken no part in the Northern Rebellion.

The family history starts with Egbert Coigniers, whose son Roger was alive during the ninth year of Edward II. Roger had another son named Roger, who married the heiress of Norton of Norton, and their son adopted that name. Six generations later, Richard Norton joined forces with the Earls of Northumberland and Westmorland in the Northern Rebellion of 1569, leading to the downfall of almost all branches of his family. He was declared an outlaw in the twelfth year of Elizabeth’s reign and died in exile in Spain. The current family descends from Sir Fletcher Norton, who was the Speaker of the House of Commons and came from Edmund Norton of Clowcroft, the third son of the old Richard Norton, who did not participate in the Northern Rebellion.

An elder branch, also descended from the third son of Sir Richard, and believed to be now extinct, was of Sawley near Ripon, from the period of Charles I.

An older branch, also descended from the third son of Sir Richard, and thought to be extinct now, was from Sawley near Ripon, dating back to the time of Charles I.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. vii. p. 546; Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. ii. p. 182; and "Memorials of the Rebellion of 1569."

See Brydges's Collins, vol. vii. p. 546; Whitaker's Richmondshire, vol. ii. p. 182; and "Memorials of the Rebellion of 1569."

Arms.—Azure, a maunch ermine, over all a bend gules. In the reign of Edward II., Sir John de Conyers bore, Azure, a maunch or, and a hand proper. Sir Robert de Conyers at the same period reversed the colours, bearing, Or, a maunch azure, and a hand proper. Monsieur Robert Conyers in the reign of Richard II. bore, Azure, a maunch or charged with an annulet sable. (Rolls of the dates.)

Coat of Arms.—Blue background, with a white maunch and a red diagonal stripe. During the reign of Edward II, Sir John de Conyers displayed, Blue background, a gold maunch, and a natural-colored hand. At the same time, Sir Robert de Conyers reversed the colors, showing, Gold background, a blue maunch, and a natural-colored hand. Monsieur Robert Conyers during the reign of Richard II displayed, Blue background, a gold maunch with a black ring on it. (Rolls of the dates.)

Present Representative, Fletcher Norton, 3rd Baron Grantley.

Present Representative, Fletcher Norton, 3rd Baron Grantley.





Savile of Methley, Earl of mexborough in Ireland 1765; and Baron Pollington 1753.

arms_page310.jpg

The family of Savile was one of the most illustrious in the West Riding of the county of York. Some writers have fancifully ascribed to it an Italian origin, but it probably had its rise at Silkston, in this county. It certainly flourished in those parts in the thirteenth century; and in the middle of the fourteenth century we find (1358) Margaret Savile Prioress of Kirklees.

The Savile family was one of the most notable in West Riding, York County. Some writers have imaginatively suggested that it has Italian roots, but it likely originated in Silkston, located in this county. The family definitely thrived in the area during the thirteenth century, and by the mid-fourteenth century, we see (1358) Margaret Savile serving as Prioress of Kirklees.

In the reign of Edward III. the family divided itself into two main branches, in the person of two brothers, John of Tankersley and Henry of Bradley. The senior branch acquired its greatest renown in the person of George first Marquess of Halifax, a title which became extinct in 1700. The junior branch was of Copley and Methley, and, having produced one of the most learned men of our country, Sir Henry Savile, the Provost of Eton, is now represented by the Earl of Mexborough.

During the reign of Edward III, the family split into two main branches, represented by two brothers, John of Tankersley and Henry of Bradley. The senior branch gained significant fame through George, the first Marquess of Halifax, a title that became extinct in 1700. The junior branch came from Copley and Methley and produced one of the most educated men in our country, Sir Henry Savile, the Provost of Eton. It is now represented by the Earl of Mexborough.

See Dugdale's Baronage, ii. p. 462; Whitaker's Leeds, vol. i. pp. 272, 310; Archdall's ed. of Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, vol. iii. p. 156; Hunter's Antiquarian Notices of Lupset, 1851; and the Savile Correspondence, edited for the Camden Society by W. D. Cooper, F.S.A., 1858.

See Dugdale's Baronage, vol. ii, p. 462; Whitaker's Leeds, vol. i, pp. 272, 310; Archdall's edition of Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, vol. iii, p. 156; Hunter's Antiquarian Notices of Lupset, 1851; and the Savile Correspondence, edited for the Camden Society by W. D. Cooper, F.S.A., 1858.

Arms.—Argent, on a bend sable three owls of the field. This coat was borne by Monsieur John Sayvill, in the reign of Richard II. His son John differenced it by a label of three points gules.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a black diagonal stripe that has three owls in the same color. This coat was used by John Sayvill during the reign of Richard II. His son John changed it by adding a red label with three points.

Present Representative, John Charles George Savile, 4th Earl of Mexborough.

Present Representative, John Charles George Savile, 4th Earl of Mexborough.





Gower of Stittenham, Duke of Sutherland 1833; Marquess of Stafford 1786; Earl Gower 1746; Baron 1703.

arms_page311.jpg

Descended from Sir Nicholas Gower, knight of the shire for this county in the reign of Edward III., and seated at Stittenham from about the same period. Of this family, it has been said, was Gower the Poet, but Sir Harris Nicolas in his memoir of Gower could not trace the connection. Leland remarks, "The House of Gower the Poet yet remayneth at Switenham (Stittenham) in Yorkshire, and divers of them syns have beene knightes." In the end of the seventeenth century the wealth of this family was greatly increased by marriage with the heiress of Leveson, of Trentham, in Staffordshire, and also in the year 1785 by the marriage of the Marquess of Stafford with Elizabeth, daughter and heir of William eighteenth Earl of Sutherland, mother of the present Duke.

Descended from Sir Nicholas Gower, a knight for this county during the reign of Edward III, and settled in Stittenham since around the same time. It's been said that Gower the Poet came from this family, but Sir Harris Nicolas, in his memoir about Gower, couldn’t confirm that link. Leland noted, "The House of Gower the Poet still remains at Switenham (Stittenham) in Yorkshire, and several of them have since been knights." By the end of the seventeenth century, the family's wealth significantly increased through a marriage with the heiress of Leveson from Trentham in Staffordshire, and again in 1785 when the Marquess of Stafford married Elizabeth, the daughter and heir of William, the eighteenth Earl of Sutherland, and mother of the current Duke.

Younger Branches. The Earl of Ellesmere 1846, and Gower of Bill-Hill, co. Berks, descended from John son of John first Earl Gower, by his third wife.

Younger Branches. The Earl of Ellesmere 1846, and Gower of Bill-Hill, co. Berks, are descendants of John, son of John, the first Earl Gower, through his third wife.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. ii. p. 441; Historical and Antiquarian Mag., 1828, vol. ii. p. 103; and Leland's Itin., vol. vi. fol. 15.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. ii. p. 441; Historical and Antiquarian Mag., 1828, vol. ii. p. 103; and Leland's Itin., vol. vi. fol. 15.

Arms.—Barry of eight argent and gules, a cross patonce sable.

Arms.—Divided into eight parts, silver and red, featuring a black cross with wider ends.

Present Representative, George Granville William Sutherland Leveson Gower, 3rd Duke of Sutherland, K. G.

Present Representative, George Granville William Sutherland Leveson Gower, 3rd Duke of Sutherland, K. G.





Dawnay of Cowick and Danby, Viscount Downe in Ireland 1680.

arms_page312.jpg

A Norman family by reputation, and said to be traced to the Conquest, descended from Sir William Downay, who was in the wars in the Holy Land with Richard I. in 1192, at which time that King gave him, in memory of his acts of valour, a ring from his finger, which is still in possession of the family.

A family of Norman descent, supposedly traced back to the Conquest, descended from Sir William Downay, who fought in the Holy Land alongside Richard I in 1192. At that time, the King gave him a ring from his finger as a memento of his bravery, and that ring is still held by the family.

At an early period the Dawnays were in possession of lands in Cornwall; fifteen manors in that county descended by an heiress to the house of Courtenay Earl of Devon, about the reign of Edward II. In Richard the Second's time the family removed into this county by a match with the heiress of Newton of Snaith. Cowick was the seat and residence of Sir Guy Dawnay, in the reigns of Henry VII. and Henry VIII.

At an early time, the Dawnays owned land in Cornwall; fifteen manors in that area passed down through an heiress to the Courtenay family, Earls of Devon, around the reign of Edward II. During Richard II's reign, the family moved to this county by marrying the heiress of Newton of Snaith. Cowick was the home and residence of Sir Guy Dawnay during the reigns of Henry VII and Henry VIII.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 453; and Gilbert's Cornwall, vol. i. p. 457.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 453; and Gilbert's Cornwall, vol. i. p. 457.

Arms.—Argent, on a bend cotised sable three annulets of the field.

Coat of Arms.—Silver, with a black striped diagonal band featuring three rings from the background.

Present Representative, Hugh Richard Dawnay, 8th Viscount Downe.

Present Representative, Hugh Richard Dawnay, 8th Viscount Downe.





Pilkington of Nether-Bradley and Chevet-Hall, Baronet of Nova-Scotia 1635.

arms_page313.jpg

"A right ancient family, gentlemen of repute in the county (of Lancaster) before the Conquest," according to Fuller in his "Worthies," and also mentioned by Gwillim as a "knightly family of great antiquity, taking name from Pilkington in Lancashire." That estate appears to have remained in the family until the ruin of the elder branch in consequence of Sir Thomas Pilkington having taken part against Henry VII. and with Richard III. at the battle of Bosworth. The present house descended from Sir John Pilkington, second son of Robert Pilkington, and brother of the unfortunate Sir Thomas. His son Robert is stated to have been of Bradley, in this county. He died in 1429, and was the ancestor of Sir Arthur the first Baronet.

"A very old family, respected in the county of Lancaster before the Conquest," according to Fuller in his "Worthies," and also noted by Gwillim as a "knightly family of great antiquity, taking their name from Pilkington in Lancashire." That estate seems to have stayed in the family until the downfall of the elder branch after Sir Thomas Pilkington sided with Richard III against Henry VII at the Battle of Bosworth. The current house traces its lineage back to Sir John Pilkington, the second son of Robert Pilkington and brother of the unfortunate Sir Thomas. His son Robert is said to have been from Bradley in this county. He died in 1429 and was the ancestor of Sir Arthur, the first Baronet.

Younger Branches. Pilkington of Park-Lane Hall, in this county, descended from the second son of Robert Pilkington, of Bradley, who was living in 1540; and Pilkington of Tore, in the county of Westmeath, descended from Sir Robert, younger brother of Sir John Pilkington, ancestor of the house of Bradley.

Younger Branches. Pilkington of Park-Lane Hall, in this county, is descended from the second son of Robert Pilkington, of Bradley, who was alive in 1540; and Pilkington of Tore, in Westmeath, is descended from Sir Robert, the younger brother of Sir John Pilkington, the ancestor of the Bradley family.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iv. p. 338; Hunter's South Yorkshire, vol. ii. p. 394; Burke's Landed Gentry; and "The Grand Juries of the County of Westmeath," vol. ii. p. 254.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iv. p. 338; Hunter's South Yorkshire, vol. ii. p. 394; Burke's Landed Gentry; and "The Grand Juries of the County of Westmeath," vol. ii. p. 254.

Arms.—A cross patonce voided gules. The crest, "a mower of parti-colours argent and gules," is said by Fuller in his "Worthies of England" to have been assumed in memory of the ancestor of the family having so disguised himself in order to escape after the Battle of Hastings. The Battle of Bosworth is the more probable scene of this event, where four knights of the family were in arms on the part of Richard III.

Arms.—A cross patonce with a red outline. The crest, "a mower in alternating colors of silver and red," was mentioned by Fuller in his "Worthies of England" as being chosen to honor an ancestor of the family who disguised himself to escape after the Battle of Hastings. However, the more likely context for this story is the Battle of Bosworth, where four knights from the family fought for Richard III.

Present Representative, Sir Lionel Milborne Swinnerton Pilkington, 11th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Lionel Milborne Swinnerton Pilkington, 11th Baronet.





Stourton of Allerton, Baron Stourton 1447.

arms_page314.jpg

A well-known Wiltshire family, seated at Stourton, in that county, soon after the Norman Conquest. "The name of the Stourtons be very aunciente yn those parties," writes Leland in his Itinerary. "The Ryver of Stoure risith ther of six fountaines or springer, wherof three be on the northe side of the Parke harde withyn the pale: the other three be north also, but without the Parke; the Lord Stourton gyveth these six Fountaynes yn his armes."

A well-known family from Wiltshire, based in Stourton, in that county, soon after the Norman Conquest. "The name of the Stourtons is very ancient in those parts," writes Leland in his Itinerary. "The River Stour rises there from six fountains or springs, three of which are on the north side of the park, just inside the boundary; the other three are also to the north, but outside the park; Lord Stourton includes these six fountains in his coat of arms."

The Yorkshire property, and consequent settlement in this county, came from the match with the heiress of Langdale Lord Langdale in 1775.

The Yorkshire property and the resulting settlement in this county came from the marriage to the heiress of Langdale, Lord Langdale, in 1775.

Younger Branch. Stourton, (called Vavasour,) of Hazlewood. Baronet 1828, first cousin of the present peer.

Younger Branch. Stourton, (known as Vavasour) of Hazlewood. Baronet 1828, first cousin of the current peer.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. vi. p. 633; and Leland's Itin., vii. fol. 78 b.

See Brydges's Collins, vol. vi. p. 633; and Leland's Itin., vii. fol. 78 b.

Arms.—Sable, a bend or between six fountains proper.

Coat of Arms.—Black, with a diagonal gold stripe between six natural fountains.

Present Representative, Charles Stourton, 18th Baron Stourton.

Present Representative, Charles Stourton, 18th Baron Stourton.





Markham of Becca-Hall.

arms_page315.jpg

A remote branch of an ancient Nottinghamshire family, which can be traced to the time of Henry II. The name is derived from Markham, near Tuxford, in that county, but Coatham was afterwards the family seat, until it was sold by Markham, "a fatal unthrift," who was the brother of the antiquary Francis Markham; this was about the end of the reign of Elizabeth. William Markham, Archbishop of York, who died in 1807, was the ancestor and restorer of this worthy family; he was descended from Daniel, a younger son of the House of Coatham. Becca-Hall has been in possession of the Markhams since the end of the last century.

A distant branch of an old Nottinghamshire family that dates back to the time of Henry II. The name comes from Markham, near Tuxford, in that county, but Coatham later became the family home until it was sold by Markham, "a reckless spender," who was the brother of the historian Francis Markham; this happened around the end of Queen Elizabeth's reign. William Markham, Archbishop of York, who passed away in 1807, was the ancestor and restorer of this distinguished family; he was a descendant of Daniel, a younger son of the House of Coatham. Becca-Hall has been owned by the Markhams since the late 1700s.

See Markham's History of the Markhams, privately printed, 8vo. 1854; the Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries, 1859; and the Topographer, vol. ii. p. 296, for Markham of Sedgebrook, co. Lincoln, extinct 1779.

See Markham's History of the Markhams, privately printed, 8vo. 1854; the Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries, 1859; and the Topographer, vol. ii. p. 296, for Markham of Sedgebrook, co. Lincoln, extinct 1779.

Arms.—Azure, on a chief or a demi-lion rampant issuing gules. The Markhams of Sedgebrook bore their arms differenced by a border argent.

Coat of Arms.—Blue, with a gold top section displaying a red half-lion standing upright. The Markhams of Sedgebrook had their coat of arms bordered in silver.

Present Representative, William Thomas Markham, Esq.

Present Representative, William Thomas Markham, Esq.





Burton (called Denison), of Grimstone, Baron Londesborough 1850.

arms_page316.jpg

The name is derived from Boreton, in the parish of Condover, in Shropshire, an estate which remained in the family until the reign of James I., although the Burtons became resident at Longner, in the same county, prior to the reign of Edward IV. "Goiffrid de Bortona," (Burton,) one of the foresters of Shropshire, in the reign of Henry I., is the first recorded ancestor. The senior line of this house terminated with Thomas Burton, who died unmarried in 1730, and whose sister carried the Longner estate to the Lingen family, who have assumed the name of Burton (see p. 198.) Thomas, fifth son of Thomas Burton, of Longner, is the ancestor of the present family, and of the Marquess of Conyngham (elder brother of the late Lord Londesborough). He went to Ireland in the reign of James I., and died there in 1665. His great-grandson married the heiress of Conyngham. The late Lord assumed the name of Denison on succeeding to the estates of his uncle W. J. Denison, Esq.

The name comes from Boreton, in the parish of Condover, in Shropshire, an estate that stayed in the family until the reign of James I, even though the Burtons started living at Longner, in the same county, before the reign of Edward IV. "Goiffrid de Bortona" (Burton), one of the foresters of Shropshire during the reign of Henry I, is the first recorded ancestor. The main line of this family ended with Thomas Burton, who died unmarried in 1730, and whose sister brought the Longner estate to the Lingen family, who adopted the name Burton (see p. 198). Thomas, the fifth son of Thomas Burton of Longner, is the ancestor of the current family and of the Marquess of Conyngham (the older brother of the late Lord Londesborough). He moved to Ireland during the reign of James I and died there in 1665. His great-grandson married the heiress of Conyngham. The late Lord took the name Denison after inheriting his uncle W. J. Denison, Esq.’s estates.

See Archdall's edition of Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, vol. vii. p. 173; and Morris MSS.

See Archdall's edition of Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, vol. vii. p. 173; and Morris MSS.

Arms.—Per pale azure and purpure, a cross engrailed or between four roses argent, granted in 1478, and commemorative of the devotion of this house to the White Rose of York.

Arms.—Split vertically in blue and purple, featuring a gold wavy cross surrounded by four silver roses, awarded in 1478, honoring this house's loyalty to the White Rose of York.

Present Representative, William Henry Forester Denison, 2nd Baron Londesborough.

Present Representative, William Henry Forester Denison, 2nd Baron Londesborough.





Gentle.

Rawdon of Rawdon-Hall, Marquess of Hastings 1816 Earl of Moira in Ireland 1761; Baronet 1665.

arms_page317.jpg

Rawdon, in the parish of Guiseley in this county, is the original seat of this ancient family, which is traced to Thor de Rawdon, whose son Serlo lived in the reign of Stephen. Rawdon remained the family residence till early in the seventeenth century, when Sir George Rawdon, the then head of the house, removed into the North of Ireland, and was seated at Moira, in the county of Down, where the family principally lived till the match with the heiress of Hastings in 1752.

Rawdon, located in the parish of Guiseley in this county, is the original home of this ancient family, which traces its roots back to Thor de Rawdon. His son Serlo lived during the reign of Stephen. Rawdon was the family residence until the early seventeenth century when Sir George Rawdon, the head of the family at that time, moved to Northern Ireland and settled in Moira, in County Down, where the family mainly lived until their marriage alliance with the heiress of Hastings in 1752.

See Whitaker's Leeds, vol. i. p. 171; Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 606; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 467; and Archdall's Lodge, vol. iii. p. 95.

See Whitaker's Leeds, vol. i. p. 171; Brydges's Collins, vol. iv. p. 606; Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 467; and Archdall's Lodge, vol. iii. p. 95.

Arms.—Argent, a fess between three pheons sable.

Arms.—Silver with a band featuring three black arrowheads.

Present Representative, Henry Weysford Charles Plantagenet Rawdon Hastings, 4th Marquess of Hastings.

Present Representative, Henry Weysford Charles Plantagenet Rawdon Hastings, 4th Marquess of Hastings.





Tancred of Borough-Bridge, Baronet 1662.

arms_page318a.jpg

At a very early date, and probably not long after the Conquest, the ancestors of this family were seated at Borough-Bridge, which appears to have been ever since one of the residences of the house of Tancred.

At a very early date, and probably not long after the Conquest, the ancestors of this family settled at Borough-Bridge, which seems to have been one of the homes of the Tancred family ever since.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 387.

See Wotton's Baronetage, vol. iii. p. 387.

Arms.—Argent, a chevron between three escallops gules.

Coat of Arms.—Silver field with a chevron between three red scallops.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas Tancred, 7th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir Thomas Tancred, 7th Baronet.





Meynell of North Kilvington.

arms_page318b.jpg

Hilton in Cleveland appears to have been the original seat of this ancient family; here it was resident in the twelfth century, and here it remained till the middle of the sixteenth, when Anthony Meynell, the immediate ancestor of the present family, removed by purchase to North Kilvington, which has since continued the residence of his descendants.

Hilton in Cleveland seems to have been the original home of this ancient family; it was located there in the twelfth century, and it stayed that way until the mid-sixteenth century when Anthony Meynell, the direct ancestor of the current family, bought a property in North Kilvington, which has since been the home of his descendants.

See Graves's History of Cleveland; and Burke's Landed Gentry.

See Graves's History of Cleveland; and Burke's Landed Gentry.

Arms.—Azure, three bars gemelles and a chief or. This is the ancient coat of Meysnill or Meynell of Dalby-on-the-Woulds in Leicestershire, and was borne by Trevor de Menyll in the reign of Henry III., and also by Sir Nicholas de Meynell in that of Edward II., with the exception of two instead of three bars gemelles. (Rolls of the dates.)

Arms.—Blue, with three parallel bars and a gold chief. This is the historic coat of arms of Meysnill or Meynell from Dalby-on-the-Wolds in Leicestershire. It was utilized by Trevor de Menyll during the reign of Henry III, and also by Sir Nicholas de Meynell during the reign of Edward II, although Sir Nicholas's version had two bars instead of three. (Rolls of the dates.)

Present Representative, Thomas Meynell, Esq.

Present Rep, Thomas Meynell, Esq.





Anne of Burgh-Wallis.

arms_page319.jpg

Of this family Mr. Hunter has remarked, that "it is a single instance of the male line being maintained in its ancient port and rank out of all the gentry of the Deanery of Doncaster, summoned to appear before the Heralds in 1584." The pedigree begins with Sir William de Anne, Constable of the Castle of Tickhill in the time of Edward II. He married the coheiress of Haringel, from whom came the manor of Frickley, sold in the latter part of the eighteenth century. Burgh-Wallis came from the heiress of Fenton in the reign of Elizabeth. Mr. Hunter observes, "The Annes, like too many other families, have not been careful of preserving their ancient evidences, and theirs was not one of the muniment rooms to which our diligent antiquary Dodsworth had access."

Of this family, Mr. Hunter noted that "it is a unique case of the male line being maintained in its historic status and rank among all the gentry of the Deanery of Doncaster, summoned to appear before the Heralds in 1584." The lineage starts with Sir William de Anne, Constable of Tickhill Castle during the reign of Edward II. He married the coheiress of Haringel, which led to the manor of Frickley being sold in the late eighteenth century. Burgh-Wallis originated from the heiress of Fenton during the reign of Elizabeth. Mr. Hunter comments, "The Annes, like too many other families, have not been diligent in preserving their historical documents, and theirs was not one of the places where our devoted antiquarian Dodsworth had access."

See Hunter's South Yorkshire, vol. ii. pp. 148, 485.

See Hunter's South Yorkshire, vol. ii, pp. 148, 485.

Arms.—Gules, three stag's heads cabossed argent attired or.

Arms.—Red background, featuring three silver stag heads facing forward with gold antlers.

Present Representative, George Anne, Esq.

Present Rep, George Anne, Esq.





Lister of Gisburn, Baron Ribblesdale 1797.

arms_page320.jpg

The pedigree is traced to the sixth of Edward II., when John de Lister was resident at Derby. He married the daughter and heiress of John de Bolton, Bowbearer of Bollond, and thus became connected with this county. The elder line was of Mydhope, or Middop, and afterwards, in the reign of Philip and Mary, of Thornton in Craven, and became extinct in 1667. The present family is sprung from Thomas, second son of Christopher Lister, who lived in the time of Edward IV. The Listers were of Gisburn early in the sixteenth century, the ancient seat of Arnoldsbiggin in that manor being their seat for many generations. Lyster, of Rowton, in Shropshire, is supposed to be a branch of this family, though there is no evidence of the fact; Rowton has been in possession of the Lysters since 1482.

The family lineage goes back to the sixth of Edward II, when John de Lister lived in Derby. He married the daughter and heiress of John de Bolton, Bowbearer of Bollond, and that’s how he connected with this county. The elder line was from Mydhope, or Middop, and later, during the reign of Philip and Mary, from Thornton in Craven, which became extinct in 1667. The current family descends from Thomas, the second son of Christopher Lister, who lived during the time of Edward IV. The Listers were in Gisburn in the early sixteenth century, with the ancient seat at Arnoldsbiggin in that manor being their residence for many generations. Lyster, of Rowton in Shropshire, is thought to be a branch of this family, although there's no evidence to support that; Rowton has been owned by the Lysters since 1482.

See Whitaker's Craven, ed. 1812, pp. 38, 103; and Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 584; and for Rowton, Blakeway's Sheriffs of Salop, p. 144.

See Whitaker's Craven, ed. 1812, pp. 38, 103; and Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 584; and for Rowton, Blakeway's Sheriffs of Salop, p. 144.

Arms.—Ermine, on a fess sable three mullets or. Lyster of Rowton bears the mullets argent.

Arms.—Ermine, with a black stripe featuring three gold stars. Lyster of Rowton has the stars in silver.

Present Representative, Thomas Lister, 3rd Baron Ribblesdale.

Present Representative, Thomas Lister, 3rd Baron Ribblesdale.





Lascelles of Harewood; Earl of Harewood 1812 Baron 1796.

arms_page321.jpg

A family of ancient standing in this county, descended from John de Lascelles, of Hinderskelfe, now called Castle Howard, in the wapentake of Bulmer, in the North riding, living in the ninth year of Edward II. For seven generations immediately following they were called "Lascelles alias Jackson." About the reign of Henry VI. they removed to Gawthorpe, also in the North riding, and afterwards to Stank and Northallerton; Harewood was purchased about 1721.

A family with a long history in this county, descended from John de Lascelles of Hinderskelfe, now known as Castle Howard, in the Bulmer wapentake in the North Riding, living in the ninth year of Edward II. For the next seven generations, they were known as "Lascelles alias Jackson." Around the time of Henry VI, they moved to Gawthorpe, also in the North Riding, and later to Stank and Northallerton; they bought Harewood around 1721.

See Whitaker's Leeds, vol. i. p. 169; and Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 508.

See Whitaker's Leeds, vol. i. p. 169; and Brydges's Collins, vol. viii. p. 508.

Arms.—Sable, a cross flory within a border or. This coat, without the border, was borne by Monsieur Lascelles de Worthorpe, as appears by the Roll of the reign of Edward III. Monsieur Rafe de Lascelles bore at the same period, Argent, three chaplets of roses vermaux, with a border engrailed sable.

Arms.—Black, with a floral cross inside a golden border. This coat, without the border, was used by Monsieur Lascelles de Worthorpe, as noted in the Roll from the reign of Edward III. During the same time, Monsieur Rafe de Lascelles had Silver, featuring three red rose wreaths red, with a black engrailed border.

Present Representative, Henry Thynne Lascelles, fourth Earl of Harewood.

Present Representative, Henry Thynne Lascelles, fourth Earl of Harewood.





Wombwell of Wombwell, Baronet 1778.

arms_page322.jpg

There was a family who took the local name of Wombwell from that manor in the thirteenth century, but this cannot with certainty be connected with it. The pedigree therefore commences with Hugh Wombwell of Wombwell, son of Henry Lowell de Wombwell, living in the reign of Edward III. The elder branch of this family became extinct in the male line on the death of William Wombwell of Wombwell, Esq. in 1733. Part of the estate from whence the name is derived belongs to the present family, who represent a junior line, descended from George Wombwell, of Leeds, who died in 1682, by purchase of the coheirs.

There was a family that took the local name Wombwell from a manor in the thirteenth century, but this connection isn't certain. The family lineage starts with Hugh Wombwell of Wombwell, the son of Henry Lowell de Wombwell, who lived during the reign of Edward III. The main branch of this family ended with the death of William Wombwell of Wombwell, Esq. in 1733, who left no male heirs. Part of the estate that the name comes from belongs to the current family, which represents a junior line descended from George Wombwell of Leeds, who passed away in 1682, through the purchase from the coheirs.

See Hunter's South Yorkshire, vol. ii. p. 124.

See Hunter's South Yorkshire, vol. ii. p. 124.

Arms.—Gules, a bend between six unicorn's heads cooped argent; and so borne in the sixth of Henry IV.

Coat of Arms.—Red with a diagonal stripe featuring six silver unicorn heads; displayed during the sixth reign of Henry IV.

Present Representative, Sir George Orby Wombwell, 4th Baronet.

Present Representative, Sir George Orby Wombwell, 4th Baronet.





Palmes of Naburn.

arms_page323a.jpg

There appears no reason to doubt the antiquity of this family, said to be descended from Manfred Palmes, living in the reign of Stephen, and seated at Naburn since the year 1226, by a match with the heiress of Watterville.

There seems to be no reason to question the age of this family, claimed to be descended from Manfred Palmes, who lived during Stephen's reign and has been based in Naburn since 1226, due to a marriage with the heiress of Watterville.

See Burke's Landed Gentry.

Check out Burke's Landed Gentry.

Arms.—Gules, three fleurs-de-lis argent, a chief vaire.

Arms.—Red background, three silver fleurs-de-lis, a split chief.

Present Representative, the Rev, William Lindsay Palmes.

Present representative, the Rev. William Lindsay Palmes.





Roundell of Screven.

arms_page323b.jpg

On the authority of Whitaker we learn that Screven has been in this family since the early part of the fifteenth century; the first recorded ancestor being John Roundell, of Screven, living in the third of Henry VI.

On the authority of Whitaker, we learn that Screven has been in this family since the early part of the 15th century, with the first recorded ancestor being John Roundell of Screven, who lived during the reign of Henry VI.

See Whitaker's Craven, ed. 1812, p. 76.

See Whitaker's Craven, ed. 1812, p. 76.

Arms.—Or, a fess gules between three olive-branches vert.

Coat of Arms.—Gold with a red horizontal stripe across three green olive branches.

Present Representative, the Rev. Danson Richardson Roundell.

Present Representative, the Rev. Danson Richardson Roundell.





"There is no subject more difficult to be dwelt on than that of honourable descent; none on which the world are greater sceptics, none more offensive to them; and yet there is no quality to which every one in his heart pays so great a respect."—SIR EGERTON BRYDGES'S Autobiography, p. 153.

"There’s no topic harder to talk about than honorable lineage; none on which people are more skeptical, and none that offends them more; yet there’s no quality that everyone secretly respects more." —SIR EGERTON BRYDGES'S Autobiography, p. 153.





INDEX




































































































































































































































































































































































WESTMINSTER:
J. B. NICHOLS AND SONS, PRINTERS.
PARLIAMENT STREET.




Transcriber's Notes:


        
        
    
Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!