This is a modern-English version of The Epidemics of the Middle Ages, originally written by Hecker, J. F. C. (Justus Friedrich Carl), Caius, John. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.



THE
OUTBREAKS
OF
THE MEDIEVAL PERIOD.

FROM THE GERMAN OF
J. F. C. HECKER, M.D.
PROFESSOR AT FREDERICK WILLIAM’S UNIVERSITY AT BERLIN,
AND MEMBER OF VARIOUS LEARNED SOCIETIES IN
ALBANY, BERLIN, BONN, COPENHAGEN, DIJON, DRESDEN, ERLANGEN, HANAU, HEIDELBERG, LEIPZIG, LONDON, LYONS, MARSEILLES, METZ, NAPLES, NEW YORK, OFFENBURG, PHILADELPHIA, STOCKHOLM, TOULOUSE, WARSAW AND ZURICH.
TRANSLATED BY
B. G. BABINGTON, M.D. F.R.S.,
ETC.
LONDON
MDCCCXLIV

LONDON:
WOODFALL & SON,
Angel Court, Skinner Street

v

GENERAL PREFACE.


The Council of the Sydenham Society having deemed Hecker’s three treatises on different Epidemics occurring in the Middle Ages worthy of being collected into a volume, and laid before its members in an English dress, I have felt much pleasure in presenting them with the copyright of the Black Death; in negociating for them, the purchase of that of the Dancing Mania, whereof I could resign only my share of a joint interest; and, in preparing for the press these productions, together with a translation, now for the first time made public, of the Sweating Sickness. This last work, from its greater length, and from the immediate relation of its chief subject to our own country, may be considered the most interesting and important of the series.

The Council of the Sydenham Society has decided that Hecker’s three treatises on various epidemics from the Middle Ages are valuable enough to be compiled into a single volume and presented to its members in English. I am pleased to offer them the copyright for the Black Death and to negotiate the purchase of the Dancing Mania copyright, from which I can only give up my share of a joint interest. Additionally, I am preparing these works for publication, along with a translation of the Sweating Sickness, which is being made public for the first time. This last piece, due to its greater length and its direct connection to our own country, may be viewed as the most interesting and significant of the series.

Professor Hecker is generally acknowledged to be the most learned medical historian, and one of the most able medical writers in Germany. His numerous works suffice to show not only with what zeal he has laboured, but also how highly his labours have been appreciated by his countrymen; and when I state that, with one trifling exception, they have all been translated into other languages, I furnish a fair proof of the estimation in which they are held in foreign countries; and, so far at least as regards the originals, a full justification of the Council of the Sydenham Society in their choice on the present occasion.

Professor Hecker is widely regarded as the most knowledgeable medical historian and one of the most skilled medical writers in Germany. His many works demonstrate not only the enthusiasm he has put into his efforts but also how much his countrymen value them. When I mention that, with one minor exception, all of his works have been translated into other languages, I provide solid proof of how they are viewed in other countries. This, at least in terms of the originals, validates the Sydenham Society Council's decision in this matter.

The “Schwarze Tod,” or “Black Death,” was published in 1832; and I was prompted to undertake its translation, from avi belief that it would prove interesting at a moment when another fearful epidemic, the Cholera, with which it admitted of comparison in several particulars, was fresh in the memory of men. The “Tanzwuth,” or “Dancing Mania,” came out shortly afterwards; and, as it appeared to me that, though relating to a less terrific visitation, it possessed an equal share of interest, and, holding a kind of middle place between a physical and a moral pestilence, furnished subject of contemplation for the general as well as the professional reader, I determined on adding it also to our common stock of medical literature. When the “Englische Schweiss,” or “Sweating Sickness,” which contained much collateral matter little known in England, and which completed the history of the principal epidemics of the middle ages, appeared in 1834, I proceeded to finish my task; but failing in the accomplishment of certain arrangements connected with its publication, I laid aside my translation for the time under a hope, which has at length been fulfilled, that at some future more auspicious moment, it might yet see the light.

The “Schwarze Tod,” or “Black Death,” was published in 1832, and I was motivated to translate it because I thought it would be interesting at a time when another dreadful epidemic, Cholera, which it could be compared to in several ways, was still fresh in people's minds. The “Tanzwuth,” or “Dancing Mania,” was released soon after, and since I believed it was less terrifying but still equally captivating, as it represented a kind of middle ground between a physical and a moral plague, I decided to add it to our common collection of medical literature. When the “Englische Schweiss,” or “Sweating Sickness,” which included much little-known related material in England and completed the history of the major epidemics of the Middle Ages, came out in 1834, I intended to finish my task. However, due to some issues with its publication arrangements, I set my translation aside for a while, holding on to the hope that one day, at a more favorable moment, it would still be published.

It must not be supposed that the author, in thus taking up the history of three of the most important epidemics of the middle ages, although he has illustrated them by less detailed notices of several others, considers that he has exhausted his subject; on the contrary, it is his belief, that, in order to come at the secret springs of these general morbific influences, a most minute as well as a most extended survey of them, such as can be made only by the united efforts of many, is required. He would seem to aim at collecting together such a number of facts from the medical history of all countries and of all ages, as may at length enable us to deal with epidemics in the same way as Louis has dealt with individual diseases; and thus by a numerical arrangement of data, together with a just consideration of their relative value, to arrive at the discovery of general laws. The present work, therefore, is but one stone of an edifice, for the construction of which he invites medical men in all parts of the world to furnish materials[1].

It shouldn't be assumed that the author, by examining the history of three of the most significant epidemics of the Middle Ages, and providing less detailed accounts of several others, believes he has covered everything. On the contrary, he thinks that to truly understand the underlying causes of these widespread health influences, we need both a thorough and broad exploration that can only be achieved through the collaborative efforts of many individuals. He seems to aim to gather a comprehensive collection of facts from the medical histories of all countries and periods, enabling us to approach epidemics similarly to how Louis approached individual diseases. This way, through a systematic arrangement of data and careful consideration of its relative value, we can discover general laws. Thus, this work is just one part of a larger project, and he encourages medical professionals around the world to contribute materials. [1]

Whether the information which could be collected even by viithe most diligent and extensive research would prove sufficiently copious and accurate to enable us to pursue this method with complete success, may be a matter of doubt; but it is at least probable, that many valuable facts, now buried in oblivion, would thus be brought to light; and the incidental results, as often occurs in the pursuit of science, might prove as serviceable as those which were the direct object of discovery. Of what immense importance, for instance, in the fourteenth century, would a general knowledge have been of the simple but universal circumstance, that in all severe epidemics, from the time of Thucydides[2] to the present day, a false suspicion has been entertained by the vulgar, that the springs or provisions have been poisoned, or the air infected by some supposed enemies to the common weal. How many thousands of innocent lives would thus have been spared, which were barbarously sacrificed under this absurd notion?

Whether the information that could be gathered even by vii the most diligent and thorough research would be enough and accurate enough for us to successfully follow this method is uncertain. However, it's likely that many valuable facts, currently lost to history, would be uncovered this way. Additionally, the unexpected findings, as often happens in scientific research, might end up being just as useful as the original discoveries we aimed for. For example, in the fourteenth century, how important would it have been to know that throughout severe epidemics, from the time of Thucydides[2] to today, the general public has held a misguided belief that springs or food supplies were poisoned, or that the air was contaminated by some imagined threats to public health? How many thousands of innocent lives would have been saved, which were cruelly taken under this ridiculous belief?

Whether Hecker’s call for aid in his undertaking has, in any instance, been answered by the physicians of Germany, I know not; but he will be as much pleased to learn, as I am to inform him, that it was the perusal of the “Black Death” which suggested to Dr. Simpson of Edinburgh the idea of collecting materials for a history of the Leprosy, as it existed in Great Britain during the middle ages; and that this author’s very learned and interesting antiquarian researches on that subject, as published in the Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, have been the valuable, and, I trust, will not prove the solitary result.

Whether Hecker's request for help in his project has ever been answered by the doctors in Germany, I don't know; but I am pleased to share that it was the reading of the “Black Death” that inspired Dr. Simpson from Edinburgh to gather information for a history of Leprosy as it was in Great Britain during the middle ages. This author's highly knowledgeable and engaging historical research on that topic, published in the Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, has been a valuable contribution, and I hope it won't be the only one.

As the three treatises, now comprised for the first time under the title of “The Epidemics of the Middle Ages,” came out at different periods, I have thought it best to prefix to each the original preface of the author; and to the two which have already been published in English, that of the translator also; while Hecker’s Address to the Physicians of Germany, although written before the publication of the “Englische Schweiss,” forms an appropriate substitute for an author’s general preface to the whole volume.

As the three treatises, now gathered together for the first time under the title “The Epidemics of the Middle Ages,” were released at different times, I thought it would be best to include the original preface of the author for each. For the two that have already been published in English, I’ve included the translator’s preface as well. Additionally, Hecker’s Address to the Physicians of Germany, even though it was written before the release of the “Englische Schweiss,” serves as a fitting replacement for a general preface to the entire volume.

viii

viii

At the end of the “Black Death,” I had originally given, as No. III. of the Appendix, some copious extracts from Caius’ “Boke or Counseill against the Disease commonly called the Sweate or Sweatyng Sicknesse;” but this little treatise is so characteristic of the times in which it was written, so curious, so short, and so very scarce[3], that I have thought it worth while, with the permission of the council of our Society, to reprint it entire, and to add it in its more appropriate place, as an Appendix to the Sweating Sickness.

At the end of the “Black Death,” I initially provided, as No. III of the Appendix, some extensive excerpts from Caius’ “Book or Counsel against the Disease commonly called the Sweat or Sweating Sickness;” but this brief treatise is so representative of the times it was written in, so interesting, so concise, and so very rare that I've deemed it worthwhile, with the consent of our Society's council, to reprint it in full and include it in its more fitting place, as an Appendix to the Sweating Sickness.


ix

ADDRESS
TO THE
PHYSICIANS OF GERMANY.

By J. F. C. HECKER.

It has long been my earnest desire to address my honoured colleagues, especially those with whom I feel myself connected by congeniality of sentiment, in order to impress on them a subject in which science is deeply interested, and which, according to the direct evidence of Nature herself, is one of the most exalted and important that can be submitted to the researches of the learned. I allude to the investigation of Epidemic Diseases, on a scale commensurate with the extent of our exertions in other departments, and worthy of the age in which we live. It is, with justice, required of medical men, since their sole business is with life, that they should regard it in a right point of view. They are expected to have a perception of life, as it exists individually and collectively: in the former, to bear in mind the general system of creation; in the latter, to demonstrate the connexion and signification of the individual phenomena,—to discern the one by the aid of the other, and thus to penetrate, with becoming reverence, into the sanctuary of cosmical and microcosmical science. This expectation is not extravagant, and the truth of the principles which the medical explorer of nature deduces from it, is so obvious, that it seems scarcely possible that any doubts should be entertained on the subject.

I have always genuinely wanted to talk to my respected colleagues, especially those I feel a close connection with, about a topic that is profoundly significant to science and, based on the clear evidence from Nature itself, is one of the most important subjects we can explore. I’m referring to the study of Epidemic Diseases on a scale that matches our efforts in other fields and that is appropriate for our time. It is rightly expected of medical professionals, given that their main focus is on life, that they should view it in the correct light. They should have an understanding of life as it exists both individually and as a whole: on an individual level, they need to keep in mind the broader system of creation; on a collective level, they should illustrate the connections and meanings of individual phenomena—recognizing one with the help of the other, and thus respectfully delving into the depths of both cosmological and microcosmic science. This expectation is not unreasonable, and the validity of the principles that a medical researcher derives from this understanding is so evident that it seems almost impossible for any doubts to exist on the subject.

Yet we may ask, Has medical science as it exists in our days, with all the splendour which surrounds it, with all the perfection of which it boasts, satisfied this demand? This question we are obliged to answer in the negative.

Yet we may ask, has medical science as it exists today, with all the brilliance that surrounds it, with all the perfection it claims, satisfied this demand? We have to answer this question with a no.

x

x

Let us consider only the doctrine of diseases, which has been cultivated since the commencement of scientific study. It has grown up amid the illumination of knowledge and the gloom of ignorance; it has been nurtured by the storms of centuries; its monuments of ancient and modern times cannot be numbered, and it speaks clearly to the initiated, in the languages of all civilized nations. Yet, hitherto, it has given an account only of individual diseases, so far as the human mind can discern their nature. In this it has succeeded admirably, and its success becomes every year greater and more extensive.

Let’s focus on the study of diseases, which has been developed since the beginning of scientific inquiry. It has flourished amidst the light of knowledge and the darkness of ignorance; it has been shaped by the challenges of centuries. The monuments from both ancient and modern times are countless, and it communicates clearly to those who understand, in the languages of all civilized nations. However, until now, it has only provided insights into individual diseases, as far as the human mind can understand their nature. In this regard, it has been remarkably successful, and its success grows larger and more widespread each year.

But if we extend our inquiries to the diseases of nations, and of the whole human race, science is mute; as if it were not her province to take cognizance of them, and shows us only an immeasurable and unexplored country, which many suppose to be merely a barren desert, because no one to whose voice they are wont to listen, gives any information respecting it. Small is the number of those who have traversed it; often have they arrested their steps, filled with admiration at striking phenomena; have beheld inexhaustible mines waiting only for the hand of the labourer, and, from contemplating the development of collective organic life, which science nowhere else displays to them on so magnificent a scale, have experienced all the sacred joy of the naturalist to whom a higher source of knowledge has been opened. Yet could they not make themselves heard in the noisy tumult of the markets, and still less answer the innumerable questions directed to them by many, as from one mouth, not indeed to inquire after the truth, but to obtain a confirmation of an anciently received opinion, which originated in the fifth century before our era.

But if we expand our exploration to the diseases of nations and the entire human race, science has nothing to say; it's as if these matters are outside its scope, revealing only a vast and uncharted territory that many believe is just a barren wasteland because no credible voices provide any insight about it. Only a few have ventured through it; they often paused, filled with wonder at remarkable phenomena; they’ve seen endless resources waiting for someone's effort, and, by observing the development of collective life—which science doesn't showcase elsewhere on such a grand scale—they’ve felt the pure joy of a naturalist discovering a deeper source of knowledge. Yet, they couldn't make themselves heard over the loud noise of the markets, and even less could they respond to the countless questions posed to them by many, all asking not to seek the truth, but to get confirmation of an old belief that dates back to the fifth century before our era.

Hence it is, that the doctrine of epidemics, surrounded by the other flourishing branches of medicine, remains alone unfruitful—we might almost say stunted in its growth. For, to the weighty opinions of Hippocrates, to the doctrines of Fracastoro which contain the experience of the much-tried Middle Ages, and lastly to the observations of Sydenham, only trifling and isolated facts have been added. Beyond these facts there exist, even up to the present times, only assumptions, which might, long since, have been reduced to their original nothingness, had that serious spirit of inquiry prevailed which comprehends space and penetrates ages.

So it is that the study of epidemics, despite being surrounded by the other thriving areas of medicine, remains unproductive—we could almost say stunted in its development. The significant contributions of Hippocrates, the ideas of Fracastoro that reflect the experiences of the troubled Middle Ages, and finally, the observations of Sydenham have only been supplemented by trivial and isolated facts. Beyond these facts, even to this day, there are only assumptions that could have long ago been dismissed entirely, had a serious spirit of inquiry existed that encompasses both space and time.

No epidemic ever prevailed during which the need of morexi accurate information was not felt, and during which the wish of the learned was not loudly expressed, to become acquainted with the secret springs of such stupendous engines of destruction. Was the disease of a new character?—the spirit of inquiry was roused among physicians; nor were the most eminent of them ever deficient either in courage or in zeal for investigation. When the glandular plague first made its appearance as an universal epidemic, whilst the more pusillanimous, haunted by visionary fears, shut themselves up in their closets, some physicians at Constantinople, astonished at the phenomenon, opened the boils of the deceased. The like has occurred both in ancient and modern times, not without favourable results for science; nay, more matured views excited an eager desire to become acquainted with similar or still greater visitations among the ancients; but as later ages have always been fond of referring to Grecian antiquity, the learned of those times, from a partial and meagre predilection, were contented with the descriptions of Thucydides, even where nature had revealed, in infinite diversity, the workings of her powers.

No epidemic has ever happened without a clear need for more accurate information, and during every outbreak, the desire among scholars to understand the hidden causes of these massive forces of destruction was always strong. Was the disease something new? This sparked curiosity among doctors, and the most distinguished among them never lacked courage or enthusiasm for investigation. When the glandular plague first emerged as a widespread epidemic, while the fearful hid away in their homes, some doctors in Constantinople, intrigued by the situation, examined the boils of the deceased. Similar instances have occurred throughout history, both in ancient and modern times, yielding beneficial results for science; indeed, more developed understandings prompted an eager interest in learning about similar or even more severe outbreaks from ancient times. However, as later eras often looked back to ancient Greece, the scholars of those days, with their narrow and limited focus, were satisfied with Thucydides' descriptions, even when nature had displayed her powers in countless different ways.

These researches, if indeed they deserved that name, were never scientific or comprehensive. They never seized but upon a part, and no sooner had the mortality ceased, than the scarcely awakened zeal relapsed into its former indifference to the interesting phenomena of nature, in the same way as abstemiousness, which had ever been practised during epidemics, only as a constrained virtue, gave place, as soon as the danger was over, to unbridled indulgence. This inconstancy might almost bring to our mind the pious Byzantines who, on the shock of an earthquake, in 529, which appeared as the prognostic of the great epidemic, prostrated themselves before their altars by thousands, and sought to excel each other in Christian self-denial and benevolence; but no sooner did they feel the ground firm beneath their feet, than they again abandoned themselves, without remorse, to all the vices of the metropolis. May I be pardoned for this comparison of scientific zeal with other human excitements? Alas! even this is a virtue which few practise for its own sake, and which, with the multitude, stands quite as much in need as any other, of the incentives of fear and reward.

These studies, if they even deserve to be called that, were never scientific or thorough. They focused only on a part of the issue, and as soon as the death rate went down, the barely ignited passion quickly faded back into its previous indifference to the fascinating aspects of nature, much like how moderation during epidemics was only practiced out of necessity, giving way to reckless indulgence once the threat was gone. This inconsistency might remind us of the devout Byzantines who, after the earthquake in 529 that seemed to signal the impending epidemic, fell to their knees in front of their altars by the thousands, trying to outdo each other in Christian charity and self-restraint; but as soon as they felt the ground steady again, they returned, without guilt, to all the vices of the city. Forgive me for comparing scientific enthusiasm to other human impulses? Unfortunately, even this is a virtue that few pursue for its own sake and, like many others, requires motivation from fear and reward to thrive among the masses.

But we are constrained to acknowledge that among our medical predecessors, these incentives were scarcely ever sufficientlyxii powerful to induce them to leave us circumstantial and scientific accounts of contemporary epidemics, which, nevertheless, have, even in historical times, afflicted, in almost numberless visitations, the whole human race. Still less did it occur to them to take a more exalted stand, whence they could comprehend at one view, these stupendous phenomena of organic collective life, wherein the whole spirit of humanity powerfully and wonderfully moves, and thus regard them as one whole, in which higher laws of nature, uniting together the utmost diversity of individual parts, might be anticipated or perceived.

But we have to admit that, among our medical predecessors, their motivations were rarely strong enough to encourage them to provide us with detailed and scientific accounts of contemporary epidemics, which have, even throughout history, afflicted nearly all of humanity in countless outbreaks. Even less did they think to adopt a broader perspective, from which they could grasp these immense phenomena of collective organic life, where the entire spirit of humanity moves powerfully and wonderfully, and thus view them as a single entity, in which higher natural laws, connecting the greatest diversity of individual components, might be anticipated or understood.

Here a wide, and almost unfathomable chasm occurs in the science of medicine, which, in this age of mature judgment and multifarious learning, cannot, as formerly, be overlooked. History alone can fill it up; she alone can give to the doctrine of diseases that importance without which its application is limited to occurrences of the moment; whereas the development of the phenomena of life, during extensive periods, is no less a problem of research for the philosopher, who makes the boundless science of nature his study, than the revolutions of the planet on which we move. In this region of inquiry the very stones have a language, and the inscriptions are yet legible which, before the creation of man, were engraved by organic life, in wondrous forms on eternal tablets. Exalted ideas of the monuments of primæval antiquity are here excited, and the forms of the antemundane ways and creations of nature are conjured up from the inmost bosom of the earth, in order to throw their bright beaming light upon the surface of the present.

Here, a vast and almost incomprehensible gap exists in the field of medicine, which, in this age of mature understanding and diverse knowledge, cannot, as it once was, be ignored. Only history can bridge this gap; it alone can give the study of diseases the significance that is essential for its application to be more than just relevant to immediate situations. Meanwhile, exploring the development of life’s phenomena over long periods is just as much a research challenge for philosophers, who study the vast science of nature, as are the changes that occur on the planet we inhabit. In this area of inquiry, even the stones speak, and the inscriptions from long before mankind carry messages that were etched by organic life in remarkable forms on everlasting surfaces. Grandeur inspired by the monuments of ancient times arises here, and the forms of the primordial ways and creations of nature are summoned from deep within the earth to cast their radiant light upon the present.

Medicine extends not so far. The remains of animals make us indeed acquainted, even now, with diseases to which the brute creation was subject long ere the waters overflowed, and the mountains sunk; but the investigation which is our more immediate object, scarcely reaches to the beginning of human culture. Records of remote and of proximate eras, lie before us in rich abundance. They speak of the deviations and destructions of human life, of exterminated and newly-formed nations; they lay before us stupendous facts, which we are called upon to recognise and expound in order to solve this exalted problem. If physicians cannot boast of having unrolled these records with the avidity of true explorers of Nature, they may find some excuse in the nature of the inquiry—for the characters are dead, and the spirits of which they are the magicxiii symbols, manifest themselves only to him who knows how to adjure them. Epidemics leave no corporeal traces; whence their history is perhaps more intellectual than the science of the Geologist, who, on his side, possesses the advantage of treating on subjects which strike the senses, and are therefore more attractive,—such as the impressions of plants no longer extant, and the skeletons of lost races of animals. This, however, does not entirely exculpate us from the charge of neglecting our science, in a quarter where the most important facts are to be unveiled. It is high time to make up for what has been left unaccomplished, if we would not remain idle and mean-spirited in the rear of other naturalists.

Medicine has its limits. The remains of animals still inform us about diseases that impacted them long before floods and mountains changed the landscape. However, our current investigation barely touches on the start of human civilization. We have plenty of records from both ancient and more recent times that discuss the ups and downs of human life, the rise and fall of nations, and present us with impressive facts we need to recognize and explore to tackle this significant issue. If doctors can't claim to have examined these records with the enthusiasm of true explorers of Nature, they might have some justification due to the nature of the research—since the characters are long gone, and their spirits, which those records symbolize, reveal themselves only to those who know how to summon them. Epidemics leave no physical traces, making their history possibly more abstract than that of geology, where geologists have the advantage of studying tangible subjects that engage the senses, like fossils of extinct plants and the skeletons of lost animal species. However, this doesn’t completely excuse us from being accused of neglecting our field, especially where the most important facts are waiting to be uncovered. It’s time to catch up on what hasn’t been done if we want to avoid being left behind while other naturalists move ahead.

I was animated by these and similar reflections, and excited too by passing events, when I undertook to write the history of the “Black Death.” With some anxiety, I sent this book into the world, for it was scarcely to be expected that it would be everywhere received with indulgence, since it belonged to an hitherto unknown department of historical research, the utility of which might not be obvious in our practical times. Yet I soon received encouragement, not only from learned friends, but also from other men of distinguished merit, on whose judgment I placed great reliance; and thus I was led to hope that it was not in vain, and without some advantage to science, that I had unveiled the dismal picture of a long departed age.

I was inspired by these and similar thoughts, and excited by recent events, when I decided to write the history of the “Black Death.” With some nervousness, I released this book into the world, as it was hard to expect it would be warmly received everywhere since it fell into a previously unknown area of historical research, the value of which might not seem clear in our practical times. However, I quickly received support, not just from knowledgeable friends but also from other respected individuals whose opinions I trusted; this gave me hope that it wasn’t in vain, and that my exploration of the bleak picture of a long-gone era might benefit science.

This work I have followed up by a treatise on a nervous disorder, which, for the first time, appeared in the same century, as an epidemic, with symptoms that can be accounted for only by the spirit of the Middle Ages—symptoms which, in the manner of the diffusion of the disease among thousands of people, and of its propagation for more than two centuries, exercised a demoniacal influence over the human race, yet in close, though uncongenial alliance, with kindlier feelings. I have prepared materials for various other subjects, so far as the resources at my disposal extend, and I may hope, if circumstances prove favourable, to complete by degrees, the history of a more extensive series of Epidemics on the same plan as the “Black Death,” and the “Dancing Mania.”

This work has been followed up with a study on a nervous disorder, which, for the first time, emerged in the same century as an epidemic, displaying symptoms that can only be explained by the spirit of the Middle Ages—symptoms that, through the spread of the disease among thousands and its persistence for over two centuries, had a demonic influence on humanity, yet coexisted in a strange, although not harmonious, connection with kinder emotions. I have gathered materials on various other topics, as far as my available resources allow, and I hope, if conditions are favorable, to gradually complete the history of a broader range of epidemics in the same manner as the “Black Death” and the “Dancing Mania.”

Amid the accumulated materials which past ages afford, the powers and the life of one individual, even with the aid of previous study, are insufficient to complete a comprehensive history of Epidemics. The zealous activity of many must be exerted xivif we would speedily possess a work which is so much wanted in order that we may not encounter new epidemics with culpable ignorance of analogous phenomena. How often has it appeared on the breaking out of epidemics, as if the experience of so many centuries had been accumulated in vain. Men gazed at the phenomena with astonishment, and even before they had a just perception of their nature, pronounced their opinions, which, as they were divided into strongly opposed parties, they defended with all the ardour of zealots, wholly unconscious of the majesty of all-governing nature. In the descriptive branches of natural history, a person would infallibly expose himself to the severest censure, who should attempt to describe some hitherto unknown natural production, whether animal or vegetable, if he were ignorant of the allied genera and species, and perhaps neither a botanist nor zoologist; yet an analogous ignorance of epidemics, in those who nevertheless discussed their nature, but too frequently occurred, and men were insensible to the justest reproof. Thus it has ever been, and for this reason we cannot apply to ourselves in this department, the significant words of Bacon, that we are the ancients, and our forefathers the moderns, for we are equally remote, with them, from a scientific and comprehensive knowledge of epidemics. This might, and ought to be otherwise, in an age which, in other respects, may, with justice, boast of a rich diversity of knowledge, and of a rapid progress in the natural sciences.

Amid the wealth of information that past ages provide, the knowledge and experience of one person, even with prior study, is not enough to create a complete history of epidemics. The dedicated efforts of many individuals must be applied xivif we want to quickly produce a work that is greatly needed so that we do not face new epidemics with a blameworthy lack of understanding of similar events. How often has it seemed that centuries of experience were wasted when epidemics arose, as people stared at the events in disbelief, and even before fully understanding their nature, they shared their opinions, which were often sharply divided, defending their views with the enthusiasm of fanatics, completely unaware of the grand design of nature. In the descriptive fields of natural history, someone would surely face harsh criticism for trying to describe a previously unknown natural entity, whether animal or plant, without knowing the related genera and species, and perhaps not even being a botanist or zoologist; yet a similar ignorance of epidemics among those who still debated their nature frequently occurred, and people were oblivious to the most valid criticisms. This has always been the case, and for this reason, we cannot claim in this area the significant words of Bacon, that we are the ancients and our ancestors the moderns, as we are just as far removed as they are from a scientific and thorough understanding of epidemics. This could—and should—be different in an age that, in many other respects, can justifiably take pride in its vast variety of knowledge and rapid advancements in the natural sciences.

If in the form of an address to the physicians of Germany, I express the wish to see such a melancholy state of things remedied, the nature of the subject requires that, with the exception of the still prevailing Cholera, remarkable universal epidemics should be selected for investigation. They form the grand epochs, according to which those epidemics which are less extensive, but not, on that account, less worthy of observation, naturally range themselves. Far be it from me to recommend any fixed series, or even the plan and method to be pursued in treating the subject. It would, perhaps, be, on the whole, most advantageous, if my honoured Colleagues, who attend to this request, were to commence with those epidemics for which they possess complete materials, and that entirely according to their own plan, without adopting any model for imitation, for in this manner simple historical truth will be best elicited. Should it,xv however, be found impracticable to furnish historical descriptions of entire epidemics, a task often attended with difficulties, interesting fragments of all kinds, for which there are rich treasures in MSS. and scarce works in various places, would be no less welcome and useful towards the great object of preparing a collective history of epidemics.

If I address the physicians of Germany with the hope of improving this unfortunate situation, the topic at hand necessitates that, aside from the ongoing Cholera, we focus on significant universal epidemics for investigation. These epidemics mark major events in history and can be naturally categorized alongside those less widespread but still important for study. I’m not suggesting a specific order or method to approach this topic. It would likely be most beneficial if my esteemed colleagues, who respond to this request, start with the epidemics for which they have thorough resources, and do so in their own way, without trying to follow a specific model. This approach will reveal straightforward historical truths more effectively. However, if it proves difficult to provide comprehensive historical accounts of entire epidemics—a task often fraught with challenges—then interesting pieces from various sources, which can be found in manuscripts and rare works, would still be welcomed and valuable in creating a collective history of epidemics.

Up to the present moment, it might almost seem that the most essential preliminaries are wanting for the accomplishment of such an undertaking. The study of medical history is everywhere at a low ebb;—in France and England scarcely a trace remains, to the most serious detriment of the whole domain of medicine; in Germany too, there are but few who suspect what inexhaustible stores of instructive truth are lying dormant within their power; they may, perhaps, class them among theoretical doctrines, and commend the laborious investigation of them without being willing to recognise their spirit. None of the Universities of Germany, whose business it ought to be to provide, in this respect, for the prosperity of the inheritance committed to their charge, can boast a Professor’s chair for the History of Medicine; nay, in many, it is so entirely unknown, that it is not even regarded as an object of secondary importance, so that it is to be apprehended that the fame of German erudition, may, at least in medicine, gradually vanish, and our medical knowledge become, as practical indeed, but at the same time as assuming, as mechanical, and as defective, as that of France and England. Even those noble institutions, the Academies, in which the spirit of the eighteenth century still lingers, and whose more peculiar province it is to explore the rich pages of science, have not entered upon the history of Epidemics, and by their silence have encouraged the unfounded and injurious supposition, that this field is desolate and unfruitful.

Up to now, it might seem that the most important steps needed for such an endeavor are missing. The study of medical history is in a poor state everywhere; in France and England, hardly any traces remain, which is seriously harmful to the entire field of medicine. In Germany, too, few people realize what endless valuable insights are lying dormant within their reach; they may consider them just theoretical ideas and praise the hard work of studying them without acknowledging their significance. None of the German universities, whose responsibility it should be to ensure the well-being of this important legacy, can claim a Professorship in the History of Medicine. In fact, in many places, it's so completely overlooked that it's not even seen as a secondary priority, which raises concerns that the reputation of German scholarship, at least in medicine, may gradually fade, and our medical knowledge could become practical yet as pretentious, mechanical, and flawed as that of France and England. Even those esteemed institutions, the Academies, where the spirit of the eighteenth century still thrives, and which should be dedicated to exploring the rich pages of science, have not ventured into the history of Epidemics, and by staying silent, they've encouraged the unfounded and damaging belief that this area is barren and unproductive.

All these obstacles are indeed great, but to determined and persevering exertion they are not insuperable; and, though we cannot conceal them from ourselves, we should not allow them to daunt our spirit. There is, in Germany, a sufficiency of intellectual power to overcome them; let this power be combined, and exert itself in active co-operation. Sooner or later a new road must be opened for Medical Science. Should the time not yet have arrived, I have at least endeavoured to discharge my duty, by attempting to point out its future direction.

All these obstacles are certainly significant, but with determined and persistent effort, they are not unbeatable; and while we can't ignore them, we shouldn't let them discourage us. In Germany, there is enough intellectual power to overcome them; let this power come together and work in active collaboration. Sooner or later, a new path will be created for Medical Science. Even if that time hasn't come yet, I've at least tried to fulfill my responsibility by pointing out its future direction.


xvii

CONTENTS.


 
PAGE
General Preface
v
Hecker’s Address
ix
THE BLACK DEATH.
Translator’s Preface
xxiii
Preface
xxvii
CHAPTER I.
General Observations
1
CHAPTER II.
The Disease
2
CHAPTER III.
Causes—Spread
11
CHAPTER IV.
Mortality
21
CHAPTER V.
Moral Effects
32
CHAPTER VI.
Physicians
50
Appendix:—  
         I. The Ancient Song of the Flagellants
68
        II. Examination of the Jews accused of poisoning the Wells
74
 
xviii
THE DANCING MANIA.
Translator’s Preface
81
Preface
85
CHAPTER I.
Dancing Mania in Germany and the Netherlands.
Sect. 1.—St. John’s Dance
87
         2.—St. Vitus’s Dance
91
         3.—Causes
94
         4.—More ancient Dancing Plagues
97
         5.—Physicians
100
         6.—Decline and Termination of the Dancing Plague
103
CHAPTER II.
Dancing craze in Italy.
Sect. 1.—Tarantism
107
         2.—Most Ancient Traces.—Causes
110
         3.—Increase
116
         4.—Idiosyncracies.—Music
119
         5.—Hysteria
126
         6.—Decrease
129
CHAPTER III.
Dancing craze in Abyssinia.
Sect. 1.—Tigretier
133
CHAPTER IV.
Sympathy
139
Appendix:—  
         I. Extract from “Vita Gregorii XI.,” &c.
153
        II. From “Chronicon Magnum,” &.c
154
       III. From “die Limburger Chronik,” &c.
155
       IV. From “die Chronica van Coellen,” &c.
156
        V. From “an Account of Convulsive Diseases in Scotland,” &c.
157
      VI. Music for the Dance of the Tarantati, &c.
167
 
xix
THE SWEATING SICKNESS.
Introduction
177
CHAPTER I.
FIRST VISIT. 1485.
Sect. 1.—Eruption
181
         2.—The Physicians
185
         3.—Causes
187
         4.—Other Epidemics
188
         5.—Richmond’s Army
190
         6.—Nature of the Sweating Sickness.—Preliminary Investigation
191
CHAPTER II.
SECOND VISITATION. 1506.
Sect. 1.—Mercenary Troops
193
         2.—New Circumstances
196
         3.—Sweating Sickness
197
         4.—Accompanying Phenomena
198
         5.—Petechial Fever in Italy. 1505
199
         6.—Other Diseases
203
         7.—Blood Spots
205
CHAPTER III.
THIRD VISIT. 1517.
Sect. 1.—Poverty
208
         2.—Sweating Sickness
209
         3.—Causes
211
         4.—Habits of the English
212
         5.—Contagion
215
         6.—Influenzas
218
         7.—Epidemics of 1517
223
xx
CHAPTER IV.
FOURTH VISITATION. 1528, 1529.
Sect. 1.—Destruction of the French Army before Naples, 1528
228
         2.—Trousse-Galant in France, 1528, and the following years
235
         3.—Sweating Sickness in England, 1528
238
         4.—Natural Occurrences.—Prognostics
240
         5.—Sweating Sickness in Germany, 1529
246
         6.——————————the Netherlands
254
         7.——————————Denmark, Sweden, and Norway
255
         8.—Terror
257
         9.—Moral Consequences
261
         10.—The Physicians
264
         11.—Pamphlets
270
         12.—Form of the Disease
278
CHAPTER V.
Fifth Visit. 1551.
Sect. 1.—Eruption
290
         2.—Extension and Duration
291
         3.—Causes.—Natural Phenomena
295
         4.—Diseases
297
         5.—John Kaye
301
CHAPTER VI.
Sick from sweating.
Sect. 1.—The Cardiac Disease of the Ancients. (Morbus Cardiacus.)
306
         2.—The Picardy Sweat. (Suette des Picards—Suette Miliaire.)
315
         3.—The Roettingen Sweating Sickness
324
Chronological Survey
330
Catalogue of Works referred to
339
 
Appendix.—A Boke, or Counseill against the Disease commonly called the Sweate, or Sweatyng Sicknesse. By Jhon Caius
353

xxi

xxi

THE BLACK DEATH.


xxiii

TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE.


In reading Dr. Hecker’s account of the Black Death which destroyed so large a portion of the human race in the fourteenth century, I was struck, not only with the peculiarity of the Author’s views, but also with the interesting nature of the facts which he has collected. Some of these have never before been made generally known, while others have passed out of mind, being effaced from our memories by subsequent events of a similar kind, which, though really of less magnitude and importance, have, in the perspective of time, appeared greater, because they have occurred nearer to our own days.

While reading Dr. Hecker’s account of the Black Death that wiped out such a huge part of the human population in the fourteenth century, I was struck not only by the uniqueness of the Author’s views but also by the intriguing facts he has gathered. Some of these have never been widely known before, while others have faded from memory, overshadowed by later events of a similar nature that, although less significant, seem more impactful in hindsight because they happened closer to our time.

Dreadful as was the pestilence here described, and in few countries more so than in England, our modern historians only slightly allude to its visitation:—Hume deems a single paragraph sufficient to devote to its notice, and Henry and Rapin are equally brief.

Dreadful as the plague described here was, and in few countries more so than in England, our modern historians barely mention its impact: Hume thinks a single paragraph is enough to address it, and Henry and Rapin are just as brief.

It may not then be unacceptable to the medical, or even to the general reader, to receive an authentic and somewhat detailed account of one of the greatest natural calamities that ever afflicted the human race.

It might not be inappropriate for medical professionals, or even the general reader, to get a genuine and fairly detailed account of one of the greatest natural disasters that ever impacted humanity.

My chief motive, however, for translating this small work, and at this particular period, has been a desire that, in the study of the causes which have produced and propagated general pestilences, and of the moral effects by which they have been followed, the most enlarged views should be taken. The contagionist and the anti-contagionist may each find ample support for his belief in particular cases; but in the construction of a theory sufficiently comprehensive to explain throughout, the origin and dissemination of universal disease, we shall not only perceive the insufficiency of either doctrine, taken singly, but after admitting the combined influence of both, shall even thenxxiv find our views too narrow, and be compelled, in our endeavours to explain the facts, to acknowledge the existence of unknown powers, wholly unconnected either with communication by contact or atmospheric contamination.

My main reason for translating this small work at this particular time is my desire for a broader understanding of the causes behind widespread diseases and the moral consequences that follow them. Both the contagionists and anti-contagionists can find plenty of evidence for their beliefs in specific cases. However, when trying to create a theory that fully explains the origins and spread of diseases, we’ll see that neither viewpoint alone is enough. Even after considering the combined effects of both, we’ll still find our perspective limited and must recognize the existence of unknown factors that aren’t related to contact transmission or airborne contamination.

I by no means wish it to be understood, that I have adopted the author’s views respecting astral and telluric influences, the former of which, at least, I had supposed to have been, with alchemy and magic, long since consigned to oblivion; much less am I prepared to accede to his notion, or rather an ancient notion derived from the East and revived by him, of an organic life in the system of the universe. We are constantly furnished with proofs, that that which affects life is not itself alive; and whether we look to the earth for exhalations, to the air for electrical phenomena, to the heavenly bodies for an influence over our planet, or to all these causes combined, for the formation of some unknown principle noxious to animal existence, still, if we found our reasoning on ascertained facts, we can perceive nothing throughout this vast field for physical research which is not evidently governed by the laws of inert matter—nothing which resembles the regular succession of birth, growth, decay, death, and regeneration, observable in organized beings. To assume, therefore, causes of whose existence we have no proof, in order to account for effects which, after all, they do not explain, is making no real advance in knowledge, and can scarcely be considered otherwise than an indirect method of confessing our ignorance.

I definitely don’t want it to be taken that I’ve accepted the author’s views on astral and telluric influences, the former of which I thought had long been forgotten along with alchemy and magic. Even less am I willing to agree with his idea, or rather an ancient idea from the East that he revived, of organic life in the universe. We constantly see evidence that what affects life isn't alive itself; whether we're looking at the earth for exhalations, the air for electrical phenomena, the stars for their influence on our planet, or all these factors combined to create some unknown harmful principle for living beings, if we base our reasoning on established facts, we find nothing in this vast area of physical research that isn’t clearly governed by the laws of inert matter—nothing that resembles the consistent cycle of birth, growth, decay, death, and regeneration seen in living organisms. Therefore, to assume causes for which we have no evidence to explain effects that they don’t actually clarify is not making any real progress in knowledge and can hardly be seen as anything other than a roundabout way of admitting our ignorance.

Still, however, I regard the author’s opinions, illustrated as they are by a series of interesting facts diligently collected from authentic sources, as, at least, worthy of examination before we reject them, and valuable, as furnishing extensive data on which to build new theories.

Still, I consider the author's views, backed by a collection of interesting facts carefully gathered from reliable sources, to be at least worth looking into before we dismiss them, and valuable for providing extensive data that could help us develop new theories.

I have another, perhaps I may be allowed to say a better, motive for laying before my countrymen this narrative of the sufferings of past ages,—that by comparing them with those of our own time, we may be made the more sensible how lightly the chastening hand of Providence has fallen on the present generation, and how much reason, therefore, we have to feel grateful for the mercy shown us.

I have another, and maybe a better, reason for sharing this account of the hardships of the past with my fellow countrymen—that by comparing those struggles to our own, we can better understand how lightly the corrective hand of Providence has touched our current generation, and how grateful we should be for the mercy we've received.

The publication has, with this view, been purposely somewhat delayed, in order that it might appear at a moment when it is to be presumed that men’s thoughts will be especiallyxxv directed to the approaching hour of public thanksgiving, and when a knowledge of that which they have escaped, as well as of that which they have suffered, may tend to heighten their devotional feelings on that solemn occasion.

The publication has been intentionally delayed so that it can come out at a time when it's likely that people's thoughts will be particularly focused on the upcoming moment of public thanksgiving. This is also when an awareness of what they've avoided, along with what they've endured, might enhance their sense of devotion during that serious occasion.xxv

When we learn that, in the fourteenth century, one quarter, at least, of the population of the old world was swept away in the short space of four years, and that some countries, England among the rest, lost more than double that proportion of their inhabitants in the course of a few months, we may well congratulate ourselves that our visitation has not been like theirs, and shall not justly merit ridicule, if we offer our humble thanks to the “Creator and Preserver of all mankind” for our deliverance.

When we find out that in the fourteenth century, at least a quarter of the population in the old world was wiped out in just four years, and that some countries, like England, lost more than double that percentage of their people in a few months, we can feel grateful that our situation hasn't been as dire. We won't deserve mockery if we express our sincere gratitude to the “Creator and Preserver of all mankind” for our survival.

Nor would it disgrace our feelings, if, in expiation of the abuse and obloquy not long since so lavishly bestowed by the public on the medical profession, we should entertain some slight sense of gratitude towards those members of the community, who were engaged, at the risk of their lives and the sacrifice of their personal interests, in endeavouring to arrest the progress of the evil, and to mitigate the sufferings of their fellow men.

Nor would it embarrass us if, to make up for the abuse and insults recently directed at the medical profession, we felt some small sense of gratitude towards those community members who, risking their lives and sacrificing their own interests, worked to stop the spread of the epidemic and lessen the suffering of their fellow humans.

I have added, at the close of the Appendix, some extracts from a scarce little work in black letter, called “A Boke or Counseill against the Disease commonly called the Sweate or Sweatyng Sicknesse,” published by Caius in 1552. This was written three years before his Latin treatise on the same subject, and is so quaint, and, at the same time, so illustrative of the opinions of his day, and even of those of the fourteenth century, on the causes of universal diseases, that the passages which I have quoted will not fail to afford some amusement as well as instruction. If I have been tempted to reprint more of this curious production than was necessary to my primary object, it has been from a belief that it would be generally acceptable to the reader to gather some particulars regarding the mode of living in the sixteenth century, and to observe the author’s animadversions on the degeneracy and credulity of the age in which he lived. His advice on the choice of a medical attendant cannot be too strongly recommended, at least by a physician; and his warning against quackery, particularly the quackery of painters, who “scorne (quære score?) you behind your backs with their medicines, so filthy that I am ashamed to name them,” seems quite prophetic.

I’ve included some excerpts at the end of the Appendix from a rare little book in black letter called “A Boke or Counseill against the Disease commonly called the Sweate or Sweatyng Sicknesse,” published by Caius in 1552. This was written three years before his Latin treatise on the same topic and is both quirky and reflective of the views of his time, as well as the fourteenth century, about the causes of widespread diseases. The quotes I’ve included are sure to provide both entertainment and insight. If I’ve included more from this fascinating work than was necessary for my main purpose, it’s because I thought readers would enjoy learning about living conditions in the sixteenth century and seeing the author’s comments on the decline and gullibility of his era. His advice on choosing a medical professional is highly recommended, at least by a physician; and his warning against quackery, especially from painters, who “mock (quære score?) you behind your backs with their medicines, so disgusting that I’m ashamed to mention them,” seems incredibly prescient.

xxvi

xxvi

In conclusion, I beg to acknowledge the obligation which I owe to my friend Mr. H. E. Lloyd, whose intimate acquaintance with the German language and literature will, I hope, be received as a sufficient pledge that no very important errors remain in a translation which he has kindly revised.

In conclusion, I want to acknowledge the debt I owe to my friend Mr. H. E. Lloyd, whose close familiarity with the German language and literature will, I hope, be seen as a solid assurance that no significant errors are left in a translation that he has kindly reviewed.

London, 1833.

London, 1833.


xxvii

PREFACE.


We here find an important page of the history of the world laid open to our view. It treats of a convulsion of the human race, unequalled in violence and extent. It speaks of incredible disasters, of despair and unbridled demoniacal passions. It shews us the abyss of general licentiousness, in consequence of an universal pestilence, which extended from China to Iceland and Greenland.

We here discover a significant chapter in world history laid bare before us. It addresses a disruption of humanity, unmatched in its severity and scope. It describes unimaginable disasters, despair, and uncontrollable demonic passions. It reveals the depths of widespread lawlessness resulting from a universal plague that stretched from China to Iceland and Greenland.

The inducement to unveil this image of an age, long since gone by, is evident. A new pestilence has attained almost an equal extent, and though less formidable, has partly produced, partly indicated, similar phenomena. Its causes and its diffusion over Asia and Europe, call on us to take a comprehensive view of it, because it leads to an insight into the organism of the world, in which the sum of organic life is subject to the great powers of Nature. Now, human knowledge is not yet sufficiently advanced, to discover the connexion between the processes which occur above, and those which occur below, the surface of the earth, or even fully to explore those laws of nature, an acquaintance with which would be required; far less to apply them to great phenomena, in which one spring sets a thousand others in motion.

The reason to reveal this image of a time long past is clear. A new disease has spread widely, and while it's not as deadly, it has created and shown similar effects. The causes and its spread across Asia and Europe urge us to view it as a whole because it helps us understand the world, where all organic life is influenced by the major forces of nature. Currently, human knowledge isn't advanced enough to uncover the connections between the processes happening above and below the Earth's surface, or even to fully understand the natural laws necessary for that knowledge; let alone to apply them to significant events, where one trigger sets off a chain reaction of many others.

On this side, therefore, such a point of view is not to be found, if we would not lose ourselves in the wilderness of conjectures, of which the world is already too full: but it may be found in the ample and productive field of historical research.

On this side, therefore, you won't find such a perspective, unless we want to get lost in a maze of guesses, of which the world already has too many: but it can be found in the rich and rewarding area of historical research.

History—that mirror of human life in all its bearings, offers, even for general pestilences, an inexhaustible, though scarcely explored, mine of facts; here too it asserts its dignity, as the philosophy of reality delighting in truth.

History—that reflection of human life in all its aspects—provides, even for widespread plagues, an endless but rarely tapped source of facts; here it also maintains its importance, as the philosophy of reality reveling in truth.

It is conformable to its spirit to conceive general pestilences as events affecting the whole world—to explain their phenomena by the comparison of what is similar. Thus the facts speak for themselves, because they appear to have proceeded from thosexxviii higher laws which govern the progression of the existence of mankind. A cosmical origin and convulsive excitement, productive of the most important consequences among the nations subject to them, are the most striking features to which history points in all general pestilences. These, however, assume very different forms, as well in their attacks on the general organism, as in their diffusion; and in this respect a development from form to form, in the course of centuries, is manifest, so that the history of the world is divided into grand periods in which positively defined pestilences prevailed. As far as our chronicles extend, more or less certain information can be obtained respecting them.

It's in line with its spirit to see widespread epidemics as events that affect the entire world—to explain their patterns by comparing similarities. The facts are clear because they seem to come from those xxviii higher laws that govern human existence. A cosmic origin and intense upheaval, leading to significant impacts among affected nations, are the most notable aspects history highlights in all major epidemics. However, these diseases take on very different forms, both in how they affect the overall population and in how they spread; and over the centuries, there's a clear evolution from one form to another, resulting in distinct historical periods where specific epidemics dominated. As far as our records go, we can gather more or less reliable information about them.

But this part of medical history, which has such a manifold and powerful influence over the history of the world, is yet in its infancy. For the honour of that science which should everywhere guide the actions of mankind, we are induced to express a wish, that it may find room to flourish amidst the rank vegetation with which the field of German medical science is unhappily encumbered.

But this part of medical history, which has such a diverse and strong impact on the history of the world, is still in its early stages. In the interest of that science that should guide humanity's actions everywhere, we hope it can thrive amid the dense growth that sadly burdens the landscape of German medical science.


1
THE BLACK DEATH.

CHAPTER I.

GENERAL OBSERVATIONS.

That Omnipotence which has called the world with all its living creatures into one animated being, especially reveals himself in the desolation of great pestilences. The powers of creation come into violent collision; the sultry dryness of the atmosphere; the subterraneous thunders; the mist of overflowing waters, are the harbingers of destruction. Nature is not satisfied with the ordinary alternations of life and death, and the destroying angel waves over man and beast his flaming sword.

That all-powerful force that has brought the world and all its living creatures together into one vibrant existence particularly shows itself in the devastation of major plagues. The forces of creation clash violently; the sweltering heat of the air, the underground rumbles, and the flood of rising waters are signs of destruction. Nature isn’t content with the usual cycles of life and death, and the angel of destruction hovers over humans and animals with his fiery sword.

These revolutions are performed in vast cycles, which the spirit of man, limited, as it is, to a narrow circle of perception, is unable to explore. They are, however, greater terrestrial events than any of those which proceed from the discord, the distress, or the passions of nations. By annihilations they awaken new life; and when the tumult above and below the earth is past, nature is renovated, and the mind awakens from torpor and depression to the consciousness of an intellectual existence.

These revolutions happen in huge cycles, which the human spirit, as limited as it is, cannot fully comprehend. However, they are far more significant events on Earth than any caused by the conflicts, struggles, or emotions of nations. Through destruction, they bring about new life; and when the chaos above and below the Earth has settled, nature is renewed, and the mind emerges from slumber and gloom into a state of awareness and intellectual existence.

Were it in any degree within the power of human research to draw up, in a vivid and connected form, an historical sketch of such mighty events, after the manner of the historians of wars and battles, and the migrations of nations, we might then arrive at clear views with respect to the mental development of the human race, and the ways of Providence would be more plainly discernible. It would then be demonstrable, that the mind of nations is deeply affected by the destructive conflict of the powers of nature, and that great disasters lead to striking changes in general civilization. For all that exists in man,2 whether good or evil, is rendered conspicuous by the presence of great danger. His inmost feelings are roused—the thought of self-preservation masters his spirit—self-denial is put to severe proof, and wherever darkness and barbarism prevail, there the affrighted mortal flies to the idols of his superstition, and all laws, human and divine, are criminally violated.

If it were at all possible for human research to create a vivid and connected overview of such significant events, like historians do for wars, battles, and the migrations of peoples, we could gain a clearer understanding of the mental development of humanity, making the ways of Providence more evident. It would then be clear that a nation's mindset is heavily influenced by the destructive forces of nature, and that major disasters lead to significant changes in overall civilization. Everything in humans, whether good or evil, becomes obvious in the face of great danger. Their deepest feelings are stirred—the instinct for self-preservation takes over—self-denial is challenged, and where darkness and barbarism reign, frightened individuals turn to the idols of their superstitions, violating all human and divine laws.

In conformity with a general law of nature, such a state of excitement brings about a change, beneficial or detrimental, according to circumstances, so that nations either attain a higher degree of moral worth, or sink deeper in ignorance and vice. All this, however, takes place upon a much grander scale than through the ordinary vicissitudes of war and peace, or the rise and fall of empires, because the powers of nature themselves produce plagues, and subjugate the human will, which, in the contentions of nations, alone predominates.

In line with a general law of nature, such a state of excitement leads to a change, either positive or negative, depending on the situation, so that nations either achieve a greater level of moral value or plunge further into ignorance and wrongdoing. However, all of this occurs on a much larger scale than through the usual ups and downs of war and peace, or the rise and fall of empires, because the forces of nature themselves create disasters and dominate human will, which is typically the sole force in the conflicts between nations.


CHAPTER II.

THE DISEASE.

The most memorable example of what has been advanced, is afforded by a great pestilence of the fourteenth century, which desolated Asia, Europe, and Africa, and of which the people yet preserve the remembrance in gloomy traditions. It was an oriental plague, marked by inflammatory boils and tumours of the glands, such as break out in no other febrile disease. On account of these inflammatory boils, and from the black spots, indicatory of a putrid decomposition, which appeared upon the skin, it was called in Germany and in the northern kingdoms of Europe, the Black Death, and in Italy, la Mortalega Grande, the Great Mortality[4].

The most memorable example of what has been discussed is provided by a major plague in the fourteenth century that devastated Asia, Europe, and Africa, and which people still remember through grim stories. This plague, originating in the east, was characterized by painful boils and swollen glands that are not seen in other fevers. Because of these painful boils and the black spots indicating severe decay that appeared on the skin, it was referred to in Germany and the northern European countries as the Black Death, and in Italy as the Great Mortalega, the Great Mortality[4].

Few testimonies are presented to us respecting its symptoms and its course, yet these are sufficient to throw light upon the 3form of the malady, and they are worthy of credence, from their coincidence with the signs of the same disease in modern times.

Few accounts exist regarding its symptoms and progression, but they are enough to clarify the 3nature of the illness, and they are credible due to their alignment with modern observations of the same disease.

The imperial writer, Kantakusenos[5], whose own son, Andronikus, died of this plague in Constantinople, notices great imposthumes[6] of the thighs and arms of those affected, which, when opened, afforded relief by the discharge of an offensive matter. Buboes, which are the infallible signs of the oriental plague, are thus plainly indicated, for he makes separate mention of smaller boils on the arms and in the face, as also in other parts of the body, and clearly distinguishes these from the blisters[7], which are no less produced by plague in all its forms. In many cases, black spots[8] broke out all over the body, either single, or united and confluent.

The imperial writer, Kantakusenos[5], whose own son, Andronikus, died from this plague in Constantinople, observes large swellings[6] in the thighs and arms of those affected. When these swellings are lanced, they relieve the suffering by draining a foul substance. Buboes, which unmistakably indicate the oriental plague, are clearly described, as he also mentions smaller sores on the arms and face, as well as in other areas of the body, and makes a clear distinction between these and the blisters[7], which are also caused by the plague in all its varieties. In many instances, black spots[8] appeared all over the body, either as isolated marks or merged together.

These symptoms were not all found in every case. In many, one alone was sufficient to cause death, while some patients recovered, contrary to expectation, though afflicted with all. Symptoms of cephalic affection were frequent; many patients became stupified and fell into a deep sleep, losing also their speech from palsy of the tongue; others remained sleepless and without rest. The fauces and tongue were black, and as if suffused with blood; no beverage would assuage their burning thirst, so that their sufferings continued without alleviation until terminated by death, which many in their despair accelerated with their own hands. Contagion was evident, for attendants caught the disease of their relations and friends, and many houses in the capital were bereft even of their last inhabitant. Thus far the ordinary circumstances only of the oriental plague occurred. Still deeper sufferings, however, were connected with this pestilence, such as have not been felt at other times; the organs of respiration were seized with a putrid inflammation; a violent pain in the chest attacked the patient; blood was expectorated, and the breath diffused a pestiferous odour.

These symptoms weren't present in every case. In many instances, just one was enough to cause death, while some patients surprisingly recovered, even when experiencing all the symptoms. Signs of head issues were common; many patients became dazed and fell into a deep sleep, losing their ability to speak due to tongue paralysis; others couldn’t sleep or find rest at all. The throat and tongue turned black, as if filled with blood; no drink could quench their intense thirst, leaving their suffering unrelieved until it ended in death, which many, in their despair, hastened by their own actions. The disease was clearly contagious, as caregivers caught it from their relatives and friends, and many homes in the city lost even their last occupant. Up to this point, the usual characteristics of the eastern plague appeared. However, even greater suffering was linked to this plague, unlike anything experienced before; the respiratory organs became infected with a foul inflammation; patients suffered from severe chest pain; blood was coughed up, and their breath had a terrible odor.

In the West, the following were the predominating symptoms on the eruption of this disease[9]. An ardent fever, accompanied 4by an evacuation of blood, proved fatal in the first three days. It appears that buboes and inflammatory boils did not at first come out at all, but that the disease, in the form of carbuncular (anthraxartigen) affection of the lungs, effected the destruction of life before the other symptoms were developed.

In the West, the main symptoms when this disease first erupted were an intense fever, along with bleeding, which led to death in the first three days. It seems that buboes and inflamed boils didn't appear initially; instead, the disease presented itself as a carbuncular lung condition, causing death before any other symptoms showed up.

Thus did the plague rage in Avignon for six or eight weeks, and the pestilential breath of the sick, who expectorated blood, caused a terrible contagion far and near; for even the vicinity of those who had fallen ill of plague was certain death[10]; so that parents abandoned their infected children, and all the ties of kindred were dissolved. After this period, buboes in the axilla and in the groin, and inflammatory boils all over the body, made their appearance; but it was not until seven months afterwards that some patients recovered with matured buboes, as in the ordinary milder form of plague.

The plague raged in Avignon for six to eight weeks, and the infectious breath of the sick, who were coughing up blood, caused a terrible outbreak nearby; even just being close to those who had fallen ill meant certain death[10]; so parents abandoned their infected children, and all family bonds were broken. After this time, lumps in the armpits and groin, along with painful sores all over the body, began to appear; but it wasn't until seven months later that some patients recovered with developed lumps, similar to the usual milder form of the plague.

Such is the report of the courageous Guy de Chauliac, who vindicated the honour of medicine, by bidding defiance to danger; boldly and constantly assisting the affected, and disdaining the excuse of his colleagues, who held the Arabian notion, that medical aid was unavailing, and that the contagion justified flight. He saw the plague twice in Avignon, first in the year 1348, from January to August, and then twelve years later, in the autumn, when it returned from Germany, and for nine months spread general distress and terror. The first time it raged chiefly among the poor, but in the year 1360, more among the higher classes. It now also destroyed a great many children, whom it had formerly spared, and but few women.

This is the account of the brave Guy de Chauliac, who defended the integrity of medicine by facing danger head-on; he boldly and consistently helped those affected, ignoring the excuses of his colleagues who believed in the Arabian idea that medical help was useless and that the threat justified fleeing. He witnessed the plague twice in Avignon, first in 1348, from January to August, and then twelve years later in the autumn, when it returned from Germany, spreading widespread suffering and fear for nine months. The first time it mostly affected the poor, but in 1360, it struck more among the upper classes. It also killed many more children this time, who had previously been spared, and affected very few women.

The like was seen in Egypt[11]. Here also inflammation of the lungs was predominant, and destroyed quickly and infallibly, with burning heat and expectoration of blood. Here too the breath of the sick spread a deadly contagion, and human aid was as vain as it was destructive to those who approached the infected.

The same was observed in Egypt[11]. Here, inflammation of the lungs was common and quickly and inevitably caused death, with severe fever and coughing up blood. The breath of the sick also spread a deadly contagion, and any attempt to help was as useless as it was harmful to those who got close to the infected.

Boccacio, who was an eye-witness of its incredible fatality in 5Florence, the seat of the revival of science, gives a more lively description of the attack of the disease than his non-medical contemporaries[12].

Boccaccio, who witnessed its shocking death toll in 5Florence, the center of the science revival, offers a more vivid account of the disease's assault than his non-medical peers[12].

It commenced here, not as in the East, with bleeding at the nose, a sure sign of inevitable death; but there took place at the beginning, both in men and women, tumours in the groin and in the axilla, varying in circumference up to the size of an apple or an egg, and called by the people, pest-boils (gavoccioli). Then there appeared similar tumours indiscriminately over all parts of the body, and black or blue spots came out on the arms or thighs, or on other parts, either single and large, or small and thickly studded. These spots proved equally fatal with the pest-boils, which had been from the first regarded as a sure sign of death[13]. No power of medicine brought relief—almost all died within the first three days, some sooner, some later, after the appearance of these signs, and for the most part entirely without fever[14] or other symptoms. The plague spread itself with the greater fury, as it communicated from the sick to the healthy, like fire among dry and oily fuel, and even contact with the clothes and other articles which had been used by the infected, seemed to induce the disease. As it advanced, not only men, but animals fell sick and shortly expired, if they had touched things belonging to the diseased or dead. Thus Boccacio himself saw two hogs on the rags of a person who had died of plague, after staggering about for a short time, fall down dead, as if they had taken poison. In other places multitudes of dogs, cats, fowls and other animals, fell victims to the contagion[15]; and it is to be presumed that other epizootes among animals likewise took place, although the ignorant writers of the fourteenth century are silent on this point.

It started here, not like in the East where a nosebleed was a sure sign of imminent death; instead, it began with both men and women developing tumors in the groin and armpits, some getting as large as an apple or an egg, which people called pest-boils (gavoccioli). Then similar tumors appeared all over the body, along with black or blue spots appearing on the arms, thighs, or other areas, either single and large or small and numerous. These spots were just as deadly as the pest-boils, which had been seen from the beginning as a definite sign of death[13]. No medicine could help—almost everyone died within the first three days, some sooner and some later, after these symptoms appeared, mostly without a fever[14] or other signs. The plague spread with increasing ferocity, transferring from the sick to the healthy, like fire catching onto dry, oily fuel, and even contact with the clothing and items used by the infected seemed to trigger the disease. As it progressed, not just people but animals also fell ill and soon died if they had touched anything belonging to the infected or deceased. Boccaccio himself witnessed two pigs collapsing dead after staggering around on the rags of a person who died from the plague, as if they had been poisoned. In other places, large numbers of dogs, cats, chickens, and other animals fell victim to the contagion[15]; and it can be assumed that other outbreaks among animals occurred as well, although the uninformed writers of the fourteenth century fail to mention this.

In Germany there was a repetition in every respect of the same phenomena. The infallible signs of the oriental bubo-plague with its inevitable contagion were found there as everywhere else; but the mortality was not nearly so great as in the 6other parts of Europe[16]. The accounts do not all make mention of the spitting of blood, the diagnostic symptom of this fatal pestilence; we are not, however, thence to conclude that there was any considerable mitigation or modification of the disease, for we must not only take into account the defectiveness of the chronicles, but that isolated testimonies are often contradicted by many others. Thus, the chronicles of Strasburg, which only take notice of boils and glandular swellings in the axillæ and groins[17], are opposed by another account, according to which the mortal spitting of blood was met with in Germany[18]; but this again is rendered suspicious, as the narrator postpones the death of those who were thus affected, to the sixth, and (even the) eighth day, whereas, no other author sanctions so long a course of the disease; and even in Strasburg, where a mitigation of the plague may, with most probability, be assumed, since in the year 1349, only 16,000 people were carried off, the generality expired by the third or fourth day[19]. In Austria, and especially in Vienna, the plague was fully as malignant as anywhere, so that the patients who had red spots and black boils, as well as those afflicted with tumid glands, died about the third day[20]; and lastly, very frequent sudden deaths occurred on the coasts of the North Sea and in Westphalia, without any further development of the malady[21].

In Germany, the same phenomena were repeated in every way. The unmistakable signs of the oriental bubo-plague with its inevitable spread were there, just like everywhere else; but the death toll was not nearly as high as in the 6other parts of Europe[16]. Not all reports mention the spitting of blood, the key symptom of this deadly plague; however, we shouldn’t conclude that the disease was significantly less severe, because we need to consider the shortcomings of historical records, and individual testimonies are often contradicted by numerous others. For instance, the records from Strasburg only mention boils and swollen glands in the armpits and groins[17], which contradicts another account that states bloody spitting was also seen in Germany[18]; yet this claim is questionable since the narrator delays the deaths of those affected to the sixth or even eighth day, while no other sources support such a lengthy progression of the disease. Even in Strasburg, where some level of relief from the plague can most likely be assumed—since in 1349 only 16,000 people died—the majority passed away by the third or fourth day[19]. In Austria, especially in Vienna, the plague was just as deadly as anywhere else, with patients who showed red spots and black boils, as well as those with swollen glands, typically dying by the third day[20]; and lastly, there were frequent sudden deaths along the North Sea coast and in Westphalia, with no further worsening of the illness[21].

To France, this plague came in a northern direction from Avignon, and was there more destructive than in Germany, so that in many places not more than two in twenty of the inhabitants survived. Many were struck, as if by lightning, and died on the spot, and this more frequently among the young and strong than the old; patients with enlarged glands in the axillæ 7and groins scarcely survived two or three days: and no sooner did these fatal signs appear, than they bid adieu to the world, and sought consolation only in the absolution which Pope Clement VI. promised them in the hour of death[22].

To France, this plague came from the north, starting at Avignon, and it was more devastating there than in Germany, with many places seeing fewer than two in twenty inhabitants survive. Many were struck down suddenly, as if by lightning, and this happened more often to the young and strong than to the old; patients with swollen glands in the armpits and groin barely survived two or three days. As soon as these deadly symptoms appeared, they said their goodbyes and sought comfort only in the absolution that Pope Clement VI. assured them in their final moments. 7[22].

In England the malady appeared, as at Avignon, with spitting of blood, and with the same fatality, so that the sick who were afflicted either with this symptom or with vomiting of blood, died in some cases immediately, in others within twelve hours, or at the latest, in two days[23]. The inflammatory boils and buboes in the groins and axillæ were recognised at once as prognosticating a fatal issue, and those were past all hope of recovery in whom they arose in numbers all over the body. It was not till towards the close of the plague that they ventured to open, by incision, these hard and dry boils, when matter flowed from them in small quantity, and thus, by compelling nature to a critical suppuration, many patients were saved. Every spot which the sick had touched, their breath, their clothes, spread the contagion; and, as in all other places, the attendants and friends who were either blind to their danger or heroically despised it, fell a sacrifice to their sympathy. Even the eyes of the patient were considered as sources of contagion[24], which had the power of acting at a distance, whether on account of their unwonted lustre or the distortion which they always suffer in plague, or whether in conformity with an ancient notion, according to which the sight was considered as the bearer of a demoniacal enchantment. Flight from infected cities seldom availed the fearful, for the germ of the disease adhered to them, and they fell sick, remote from assistance, in the solitude of their country houses.

In England, the disease showed up, just like in Avignon, with symptoms like coughing up blood, and it was just as deadly. Those who experienced this symptom or were vomiting blood sometimes died immediately, while others passed away within twelve hours or, at most, two days[23]. The inflammatory boils and buboes in the groin and armpits were immediately recognized as signs of a fatal outcome, and those who had many of them all over their bodies were beyond hope of recovery. It wasn't until later in the plague that doctors dared to make incisions in these hard, dry boils, and when some pus came out, it helped push the body toward a critical healing stage, saving many patients. Every surface the sick person touched, their breath, and their clothing spread the infection; and, like in other places, caregivers and friends, either unaware of the risk or bravely ignoring it, often became victims due to their compassion. Even the patients' eyes were seen as sources of contagion[24], capable of affecting others from a distance, whether because of their unusual brightness or the changes that came with the plague, or due to an old belief that sight could convey a demonic curse. Running away from infected cities rarely helped those in fear, as the disease clung to them, causing them to fall ill in isolation at their countryside homes, far from any help.

Thus did the plague spread over England with unexampled rapidity, after it had first broken out in the county of Dorset, whence it advanced through the counties of Devon and Somerset, to Bristol, and thence reached Gloucester, Oxford and London. Probably few places escaped, perhaps not any; for the annals of contemporaries report that throughout the land only a tenth part of the inhabitants remained alive[25].

Thus, the plague spread across England at an unprecedented speed, after it first broke out in Dorset, then moved through Devon and Somerset, reaching Bristol, and from there to Gloucester, Oxford, and London. It’s likely that very few places were spared, maybe none at all, since records from that time report that only about one-tenth of the population survived.[25]

8

8

From England the contagion was carried by a ship to Bergen, the capital of Norway, where the plague then broke out in its most frightful form, with vomiting of blood; and throughout the whole country, spared not more than a third of the inhabitants. The sailors found no refuge in their ships; and vessels were often seen driving about on the ocean and drifting on shore, whose crews had perished to the last man[26].

From England, the disease was brought over by a ship to Bergen, the capital of Norway, where the plague exploded in its most horrific form, causing people to vomit blood; it wiped out no more than a third of the population across the entire country. The sailors couldn't find safety on their ships, and vessels were frequently spotted aimlessly drifting on the ocean and washing up on shore, with crews that had all died—A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.

In Poland the infected were attacked with spitting of blood, and died in a few days in such vast numbers, that, as it has been affirmed, scarcely a fourth of the inhabitants were left[27].

In Poland, those who were infected were attacked by blood-spitting, and they died within just a few days in such large numbers that, as has been stated, barely a fourth of the population remained[27].

Finally, in Russia the plague appeared two years later than in Southern Europe; yet here again, with the same symptoms as elsewhere. Russian contemporaries have recorded that it began with rigor, heat, and darting pain in the shoulders and back; that it was accompanied by spitting of blood, and terminated fatally in two, or at most, three days. It is not till the year 1360, that we find buboes mentioned as occurring in the neck, in the axillæ and in the groins, which are stated to have broken out when the spitting of blood had continued some time. According to the experience of Western Europe, however, it cannot be assumed that these symptoms did not appear at an earlier period[28].

Finally, in Russia, the plague showed up two years later than it did in Southern Europe; yet here again, it had the same symptoms as elsewhere. Russian contemporaries noted that it began with chills, fever, and sharp pain in the shoulders and back; it was accompanied by coughing up blood and often ended fatally in two or, at most, three days. It wasn’t until 1360 that we find mentions of buboes appearing in the neck, armpits, and groin, which reportedly surfaced after the blood spitting had gone on for some time. However, based on Western European experience, it can't be ruled out that these symptoms were present earlier[28].

Thus much, from authentic sources, on the nature of the Black Death. The descriptions which have been communicated contain, with a few unimportant exceptions, all the symptoms of the oriental plague which have been observed in more modern times. No doubt can obtain on this point. The facts are placed clearly before our eyes. We must, however, bear in mind that this violent disease does not always appear in the same form, and that while the essence of the poison which it produces, and which is separated so abundantly from 9the body of the patient, remains unchanged, it is proteiform in its varieties, from the almost imperceptible vesicle, unaccompanied by fever, which exists for some time before it extends its poison inwardly, and then excites fever and buboes, to the fatal form in which carbuncular inflammations fall upon the most important viscera.

Here’s what we know, from reliable sources, about the Black Death. The descriptions shared cover, with a few minor exceptions, all the symptoms of the oriental plague that have been seen in more recent times. There’s no doubt about this. The facts are clearly presented before us. However, we must remember that this severe disease doesn't always show up in the same way, and while the core of the poison it creates—which is released abundantly from the patient’s body—remains constant, it comes in various forms. It ranges from the nearly invisible blister that appears without fever, existing for a while before it sends its poison inward and then triggers fever and swollen lymph nodes, to the deadly type where carbuncular inflammations attack the most vital organs.

Such was the form which the plague assumed in the 14th century, for the accompanying chest affection which appeared in all the countries whereof we have received any account, cannot, on a comparison with similar and familiar symptoms, be considered as any other than the inflammation of the lungs of modern medicine[29], a disease which at present only appears sporadically, and, owing to a putrid decomposition of the fluids, is probably combined with hemorrhages from the vessels of the lungs. Now, as every carbuncle, whether it be cutaneous or internal, generates in abundance the matter of contagion which has given rise to it, so, therefore, must the breath of the affected have been poisonous in this plague, and on this account its power of contagion wonderfully increased; wherefore the opinion appears incontrovertible, that owing to the accumulated numbers of the diseased, not only individual chambers and houses, but whole cities were infected, which, moreover, in the middle ages, were, with few exceptions, narrowly built, kept in a filthy state, and surrounded with stagnant ditches[30]. Flight was, in consequence, of no avail to the timid; for even though they had sedulously avoided all communication with the diseased and the suspected, yet their clothes were saturated with the pestiferous atmosphere, and every inspiration imparted to them the seeds of the destructive malady, which, in the greater number of cases, germinated with but too much fertility. Add to which, the usual propagation of the plague through clothes, beds, and a thousand other things to which the pestilential poison adheres,—a propagation, which, from want of caution, must have been infinitely multiplied; and since articles of this kind, removed from the access of air, not only retain the matter of contagion for an indefinite period, but also increase its activity and engender it like a living being, frightful ill consequences 10followed for many years after the first fury of the pestilence was past.

The plague in the 14th century took on a specific form, as shown by the chest issues that arose in all the regions we have information about. When compared to similar and well-known symptoms, these can only be viewed as lung inflammation according to modern medicine[29]. This disease now appears only sporadically and is likely accompanied by bleeding from lung vessels due to the decay of bodily fluids. Just as every carbuncle, whether on the skin or inside the body, produces infectious material, so too did the breath of those infected become toxic during this plague. As a result, the contagion's potency increased significantly. It seems undeniable that, due to the large number of sick people, not just individual rooms and houses, but entire cities were infected. Moreover, in the Middle Ages, cities were, with few exceptions, tightly packed, dirty, and surrounded by stagnant ditches[30]. Therefore, fleeing was no help for the fearful; even if they carefully avoided contact with the sick and suspected, their clothing absorbed the contaminated air, and every breath they took exposed them to the seeds of this deadly disease, which often thrived far too easily. Additionally, the typical spread of the plague through clothing, bedding, and countless other items to which the infectious poison clung—this spread, due to a lack of caution, must have multiplied immensely. Items kept away from air not only retained the contagion for an indefinite time but also heightened its activity and replicated it like a living organism, leading to horrifying consequences that 10 lingered for many years after the worst of the outbreak had passed.

The affection of the stomach, often mentioned in vague terms, and occasionally as a vomiting of blood, was doubtless only a subordinate symptom, even if it be admitted that actual hematemesis did occur. For the difficulty of distinguishing a flow of blood from the stomach, from a pulmonic expectoration of that fluid, is, to non-medical men, even in common cases, not inconsiderable. How much greater then must it have been in so terrible a disease, where assistants could not venture to approach the sick without exposing themselves to certain death? Only two medical descriptions of the malady have reached us, the one by the brave Guy de Chauliac, the other by Raymond Chalin de Vinario, a very experienced scholar, who was well versed in the learning of his time. The former takes notice only of fatal coughing of blood; the latter, besides this, notices epistaxis, hematuria and fluxes of blood from the bowels, as symptoms of such decided and speedy mortality, that those patients in whom they were observed, usually died on the same or the following day[31].

The issues with the stomach, often described vaguely and sometimes as vomiting blood, were probably just a minor symptom, even if we accept that actual vomiting blood did happen. For people without medical training, distinguishing between blood coming from the stomach and blood coughed up from the lungs can be quite challenging, even in straightforward cases. So, it must have been even harder in such a deadly disease, where caregivers couldn’t get near the sick without risking their own lives. Only two medical accounts of the illness have survived, one by the brave Guy de Chauliac and the other by Raymond Chalin de Vinario, a knowledgeable scholar well-versed in the medical knowledge of his time. The first only mentions fatal coughing up of blood; the second also includes nosebleeds, blood in urine, and bleeding from the bowels as signs of such certain and swift death that patients displaying these symptoms usually died on the same day or the next.[31]

That a vomiting of blood may not, here and there, have taken place, perhaps have been even prevalent in many places, is, from a consideration of the nature of the disease, by no means to be denied; for every putrid decomposition of the fluids begets a tendency to hemorrhages of all kinds. Here, however, it is a question of historical certainty, which, after these doubts, is by no means established. Had not so speedy a death followed the expectoration of blood, we should certainly have received more detailed intelligence respecting other hemorrhages; but the malady had no time to extend its effects further over the extremities of the vessels. After its first fury, however, was spent, the pestilence passed into the usual febrile form of the oriental plague. Internal carbuncular inflammations no 11longer took place, and hemorrhages became phenomena, no more essential in this than they are in any other febrile disorders. Chalin, who observed not only the great mortality of 1348, and the plague of 1360, but also that of 1373 and 1382, speaks moreover of affections of the throat, and describes the black spots of plague patients more satisfactorily than any of his contemporaries. The former appeared but in few cases, and consisted in carbuncular inflammation of the gullet, with a difficulty of swallowing, even to suffocation, to which, in some instances, was added inflammation of the ceruminous glands of the ears, with tumours, producing great deformity. Such patients, as well as others, were affected with expectoration of blood; but they did not usually die before the sixth, and sometimes, even so late as the fourteenth day[32]. The same occurrence, it is well known, is not uncommon in other pestilences; as also blisters on the surface of the body, in different places, in the vicinity of which, tumid glands and inflammatory boils, surrounded by discoloured and black streaks, arose, and thus indicated the reception of the poison. These streaked spots were called, by an apt comparison, the girdle, and this appearance was justly considered extremely dangerous[33].

That there may have been instances of vomiting blood, possibly even widespread in many areas, is undeniable considering the nature of the disease; every putrid breakdown of body fluids creates a tendency for all kinds of hemorrhages. However, here it’s a matter of historical certainty, which is by no means established after these doubts. Had death not followed so quickly after coughing up blood, we would certainly have received more detailed reports regarding other hemorrhages; but the illness didn’t have time to spread its effects further throughout the blood vessels. After its initial intensity subsided, the plague shifted into the typical feverish form of the eastern plague. Internal carbuncular inflammations no longer occurred, and hemorrhages became phenomena no more significant here than they are in other fevers. Chalin, who observed not only the great mortality of 1348 and the plague of 1360 but also those of 1373 and 1382, additionally discusses throat afflictions and describes the black spots on plague patients more effectively than any of his contemporaries. The throat issues appeared in only a few cases and consisted of carbuncular inflammation of the throat, leading to difficulty swallowing, even to suffocation, and in some instances was accompanied by inflammation of the ear’s wax glands, resulting in tumors that caused significant deformity. Those patients, along with others, also experienced coughing up blood; however, they typically didn’t die until the sixth day, and sometimes even as late as the fourteenth day[32]. This same occurrence is well known to be common in other plagues; likewise, blisters appeared on the skin in various locations, where swollen glands and inflammatory boils arose, surrounded by discolored and black streaks, indicating the introduction of the poison. These streaked spots were aptly referred to as the girdle, and this appearance was rightly considered extremely dangerous[33].


CHAPTER III.

CAUSES.—SPREAD.

An inquiry into the causes of the Black Death, will not be without important results in the study of the plagues which have 12visited the world, although it cannot advance beyond generalization without entering upon a field hitherto uncultivated, and, to this hour, entirely unknown. Mighty revolutions in the organism of the earth, of which we have credible information, had preceded it. From China to the Atlantic, the foundations of the earth were shaken,—throughout Asia and Europe the atmosphere was in commotion, and endangered, by its baneful influence, both vegetable and animal life.

An investigation into the causes of the Black Death will lead to significant insights in the study of the plagues that have 12affected the world, even though it can't go further than generalizations without delving into an area that has not been explored and remains completely unknown to this day. Major upheavals in the Earth's ecosystem, of which we have reliable accounts, occurred before it. From China to the Atlantic, the Earth's surface was disturbed—throughout Asia and Europe, the atmosphere was agitated and threatened, with its harmful effects on both plant and animal life.

The series of these great events began in the year 1333, fifteen years before the plague broke out in Europe: they first appeared in China. Here a parching drought, accompanied by famine, commenced in the tract of country watered by the rivers Kiang and Hoai. This was followed by such violent torrents of rain, in and about Kingsai, at that time the capital of the empire, that, according to tradition, more than 400,000 people perished in the floods. Finally the mountain Tsincheou fell in, and vast clefts were formed in the earth. In the succeeding year (1334), passing over fabulous traditions, the neighbourhood of Canton was visited by inundations; whilst in Tche, after an unexampled drought, a plague arose, which is said to have carried off about 5,000,000 of people. A few months afterwards an earthquake followed, at and near Kingsai; and subsequent to the falling in of the mountains of Ki-ming-chan, a lake was formed of more than a hundred leagues in circumference, where, again, thousands found their grave. In Hou-kouang and Ho-nan, a drought prevailed for five months; and innumerable swarms of locusts destroyed the vegetation; while famine and pestilence, as usual, followed in their train. Connected accounts of the condition of Europe before this great catastrophe, are not to be expected from the writers of the fourteenth century. It is remarkable, however, that simultaneously with a drought and renewed floods in China, in 1336, many uncommon atmospheric phenomena, and in the winter, frequent thunder storms, were observed in the north of France; and so early as the eventful year of 1333, an eruption of Etna took place[34]. According to the Chinese annals, about 4,000,000 of people perished by famine in the neighbourhood of Kiang in 1337: and deluges, swarms of locusts, and an earthquake which 13lasted six days, caused incredible devastation. In the same year, the first swarms of locusts appeared in Franconia, which were succeeded in the following year by myriads of these insects. In 1338, Kingsai was visited by an earthquake of ten days’ duration; at the same time France suffered from a failure in the harvest; and thenceforth, till the year 1342, there was in China, a constant succession of inundations, earthquakes, and famines. In the same year great floods occurred in the vicinity of the Rhine and in France, which could not be attributed to rain alone; for, everywhere, even on the tops of mountains, springs were seen to burst forth, and dry tracts were laid under water in an inexplicable manner. In the following year, the mountain Hong-tchang, in China, fell in, and caused a destructive deluge; and in Pien-tcheou and Leang-tcheou, after three months’ rain, there followed unheard-of inundations, which destroyed seven cities. In Egypt and Syria, violent earthquakes took place; and in China they became, from this time, more and more frequent; for they recurred, in 1344, in Ven-tcheou, where the sea overflowed in consequence; in 1345, in Ki-tcheou, and in both the following years in Canton, with subterraneous thunder. Meanwhile, floods and famine devastated various districts, until 1347, when the fury of the elements subsided in China[35].

The series of these major events started in 1333, fifteen years before the plague hit Europe; they first appeared in China. A severe drought, leading to famine, began in the region along the Kiang and Hoai rivers. This was followed by such intense rainfall in and around Kingsai—then the capital of the empire—that, according to tradition, over 400,000 people drowned in the floods. Eventually, the Tsincheou mountain collapsed, creating huge cracks in the earth. The following year (1334), skipping over fantastic stories, the area near Canton experienced floods; meanwhile, in Tche, after an unprecedented drought, a plague emerged that is said to have killed about 5,000,000 people. A few months later, an earthquake struck Kingsai and its surroundings, and after the collapse of the Ki-ming-chan mountains, a lake formed that stretched more than a hundred leagues in circumference, claiming thousands of lives again. In Hou-kouang and Ho-nan, a drought lasted for five months; swarms of locusts devastated crops, and famine and disease followed, as they usually do. We can't expect detailed accounts of Europe's condition before this catastrophe from 14th-century writers. Interestingly, alongside the drought and renewed flooding in China in 1336, many unusual atmospheric phenomena were observed in northern France, including frequent thunderstorms that winter. As early as 1333, there was an eruption of Etna[34]. According to Chinese records, about 4,000,000 people died from famine near Kiang in 1337, and floods, swarms of locusts, and an earthquake that lasted six days caused unimaginable destruction. That same year, the first swarms of locusts appeared in Franconia, followed by countless more the next year. In 1338, Kingsai experienced an earthquake that lasted ten days; at the same time, France faced a poor harvest. From then until 1342, China saw a continuous succession of floods, earthquakes, and famines. That same year, significant floods occurred around the Rhine and in France, which couldn't be explained by rain alone; springs burst forth even on mountain tops, and dry land was inexplicably submerged. The following year, the Hong-tchang mountain in China collapsed, causing a destructive flood, and in Pien-tcheou and Leang-tcheou, after three months of rain, unprecedented floods destroyed seven cities. Violent earthquakes occurred in Egypt and Syria, and they became more frequent in China from this point on; there were earthquakes in 1344 in Ven-tcheou, causing the sea to overflow; in 1345 in Ki-tcheou; and in both of the following years in Canton, accompanied by subterranean thunder. Meanwhile, floods and famine ravaged various regions until 1347, when the severity of the elements in China finally eased[35].

The signs of terrestrial commotions commenced in Europe in the year 1348, after the intervening districts of country in Asia had probably been visited in the same manner.

The signs of land disturbances began in Europe in 1348, likely after the affected regions in Asia had experienced similar events.

On the island of Cyprus, the plague from the East had already broken out; when an earthquake shook the foundations of the island, and was accompanied by so frightful a hurricane, that the inhabitants who had slain their Mahometan slaves, in order that they might not themselves be subjugated by them, fled in dismay, in all directions. The sea overflowed—the ships were dashed to pieces on the rocks, and few outlived the terrific event, whereby this fertile and blooming island was converted into a desert. Before the earthquake, a pestiferous wind spread so poisonous an odour, that many, being overpowered by it, fell down suddenly and expired in dreadful agonies[36].

On the island of Cyprus, the plague from the East had already started spreading when an earthquake shook the island’s foundations, accompanied by a terrifying hurricane. The inhabitants, who had killed their Muslim slaves to avoid being controlled by them, fled in panic in all directions. The sea flooded—the ships were wrecked on the rocks, and few survived the horrifying disaster that turned this fertile and vibrant island into a wasteland. Before the earthquake, a toxic wind spread such a foul odor that many, overwhelmed by it, suddenly collapsed and died in excruciating pain.[36].

This phenomenon is one of the rarest that has ever been observed, 14for nothing is more constant than the composition of the air; and in no respect has nature been more careful in the preservation of organic life. Never have naturalists discovered in the atmosphere foreign elements, which, evident to the senses, and borne by the winds, spread from land to land, carrying disease over whole portions of the earth, as is recounted to have taken place in the year 1348. It is, therefore, the more to be regretted, that in this extraordinary period, which, owing to the low condition of science, was very deficient in accurate observers, so little that can be depended on respecting those uncommon occurrences in the air, should have been recorded. Yet, German accounts say expressly, that a thick, stinking mist advanced from the East, and spread itself over Italy[37]; and there could be no deception in so palpable a phenomenon[38]. The credibility of unadorned traditions, however little they may satisfy physical research, can scarcely be called in question when we consider the connexion of events; for just at this time earthquakes were more general than they had been within the range of history. In thousands of places chasms were formed, from whence arose noxious vapours; and as at that time natural occurrences were transformed into miracles, it was reported, that a fiery meteor, which descended on the earth far in the East, had destroyed every thing within a circumference of more than a hundred leagues, infecting the air far and wide[39]. The consequences of innumerable floods contributed to the same effect; vast river districts had been converted into swamps; foul vapours arose everywhere, increased by the odour of putrified locusts, which had never perhaps 15darkened the sun in thicker swarms[40], and of countless corpses, which, even in the well regulated countries of Europe, they knew not how to remove quickly enough out of the sight of the living. It is probable, therefore, that the atmosphere contained foreign, and sensibly perceptible, admixtures to a great extent, which, at least in the lower regions, could not be decomposed, or rendered ineffective by separation.

This phenomenon is one of the rarest ever observed, 14 because nothing is more constant than the composition of the air, and nature has been especially careful in preserving organic life. Naturalists have never found foreign elements in the atmosphere that could be detected by our senses and carried by the winds from one land to another, spreading disease over large portions of the earth, as was reported in the year 1348. It’s all the more unfortunate that during this extraordinary period, which was characterized by a low level of scientific understanding and a lack of accurate observers, so little reliable information about these unusual occurrences in the air has been recorded. Nevertheless, German accounts explicitly state that a thick, foul mist came from the East and spread over Italy[37]; there could be no deception regarding such a noticeable phenomenon[38]. The credibility of straightforward traditions, no matter how little they satisfy scientific inquiry, can hardly be questioned when we look at the connection of events, for at that time earthquakes were more common than they had been in recorded history. In thousands of places, chasms opened up, emitting noxious vapors; and during that period, natural events were often seen as miracles. It was reported that a fiery meteor, which fell to earth far in the East, destroyed everything within a radius of over a hundred leagues, contaminating the air for miles[39]. The aftermath of numerous floods added to the problem; vast river areas had turned into swamps, and foul vapors arose everywhere, intensified by the stench of rotting locusts, which may have never before darkened the sun in such thick swarms[40], along with countless corpses that even in the well-organized countries of Europe could not be removed quickly enough from the view of the living. It is likely, therefore, that the atmosphere contained foreign and noticeably perceptible mixtures to a significant degree, which, at least in the lower regions, could neither be decomposed nor made ineffective through separation.

Now, if we go back to the symptoms of the disease, the ardent inflammation of the lungs points out, that the organs of respiration yielded to the attack of an atmospheric poison—a poison, which, if we admit the independent origin of the Black Plague at any one place on the globe, which, under such extraordinary circumstances, it would be difficult to doubt, attacked the course of the circulation in as hostile a manner as that which produces inflammation of the spleen, and other animal contagions that cause swelling and inflammation of the lymphatic glands.

Now, if we revisit the symptoms of the disease, the intense inflammation of the lungs indicates that the respiratory organs have succumbed to an atmospheric poison—a poison that, if we accept the idea that the Black Plague originated independently at some point on the globe, which is hard to dispute given the unusual circumstances, affected the circulatory system as aggressively as the inflammation of the spleen and other animal diseases that lead to swelling and inflammation of the lymphatic glands.

Pursuing the course of these grand revolutions further, we find notice of an unexampled earthquake, which, on the 25th of January, 1348, shook Greece, Italy, and the neighbouring countries. Naples, Rome, Pisa, Bologna, Padua, Venice and many other cities suffered considerably: whole villages were swallowed up. Castles, houses and churches were overthrown, and hundreds of people were buried beneath their ruins[41]. In Carinthia, thirty villages, together with all the churches, were demolished; more than a thousand corpses were drawn out of the rubbish; the city of Villach was so completely destroyed, that very few of its inhabitants were saved; and when the earth ceased to tremble, it was found that mountains had been moved from their positions, and that many hamlets were left in ruins[42]. It is recorded that, during this earthquake, the wine in the casks became turbid, a statement which may be considered as furnishing a proof, that changes causing a decomposition of the atmosphere had taken place; but if we had no other information from which the excitement of conflicting powers of 16nature during these commotions might be inferred, yet scientific observations in modern times have shewn, that the relation of the atmosphere to the earth is changed by volcanic influences. Why then, may we not, from this fact, draw retrospective inferences respecting those extraordinary phenomena?

Continuing our exploration of these major revolutions, we come across an unprecedented earthquake that struck Greece, Italy, and the surrounding regions on January 25, 1348. Cities like Naples, Rome, Pisa, Bologna, Padua, Venice, and many others were severely affected: entire villages were destroyed. Castles, homes, and churches collapsed, burying hundreds of people under the wreckage[41]. In Carinthia, thirty villages, along with all their churches, were destroyed; over a thousand bodies were pulled from the debris, and the city of Villach was so utterly devastated that very few of its residents survived. When the ground finally stopped shaking, it was discovered that mountains had shifted from their locations and many small communities were left in ruins[42]. It is noted that during this earthquake, the wine in the barrels became cloudy, suggesting that changes in the atmosphere had occurred. Even if we lacked other evidence to understand the conflicting forces of nature during these upheavals, modern scientific observations indicate that volcanic activity alters the relationship between the atmosphere and the earth. So, why can't we use this fact to make inferences about those extraordinary events in the past?

Independently of this, however, we know that during this earthquake, the duration of which is stated by some to have been a week, and by others a fortnight, people experienced an unusual stupor and headache, and that many fainted away[43].

Independently of this, however, we know that during this earthquake, the duration of which some say lasted a week and others two weeks, people experienced an unusual stupor and headache, and many fainted away[43].

These destructive earthquakes extended as far as the neighbourhood of Basle[44], and recurred until the year 1360, throughout Germany, France, Silesia, Poland, England and Denmark, and much further north[45].

These devastating earthquakes reached as far as the area around Basel[44], and continued to occur until the year 1360, across Germany, France, Silesia, Poland, England, and Denmark, and even further north[45].

Great and extraordinary meteors appeared in many places, and were regarded with superstitious horror. A pillar of fire, which on the 20th of December, 1348, remained for an hour at sunrise over the pope’s palace in Avignon[46]; a fireball, which in August of the same year was seen at sunset over Paris, and was distinguished from similar phenomena, by its longer duration[47], not to mention other instances mixed up with wonderful prophecies and omens, are recorded in the chronicles of that age.

Huge and extraordinary meteors appeared in many places and were viewed with a mix of fear and superstition. A pillar of fire, which on December 20th, 1348, lasted for an hour at sunrise over the pope’s palace in Avignon[46]; a fireball, which was seen at sunset over Paris in August of the same year and stood out from other similar events due to its longer duration[47], not to mention other instances associated with amazing prophecies and omens, are documented in the chronicles of that time.

The order of the seasons seemed to be inverted,—rains, floods and failures in crops were so general, that few places were exempt from them; and though an historian of this century assures us, that there was an abundance in the granaries and storehouses[48], all his contemporaries, with one voice, contradict him. The consequences of failure in the crops were soon felt, especially in Italy and the surrounding countries, where, in this year, a rain which continued for four months, had destroyed the seed. In the larger cities, they were compelled, 17in the spring of 1347, to have recourse to a distribution of bread among the poor, particularly at Florence, where they erected large bake-houses, from which, in April, ninety-four thousand loaves of bread, each of twelve ounces in weight, were daily dispensed[49]. It is plain, however, that humanity could only partially mitigate the general distress, not altogether obviate it.

The order of the seasons seemed all mixed up—rains, floods, and crop failures were so widespread that hardly any place was unaffected; and while a historian from this century claims that the granaries and storehouses were full[48], all his contemporaries unanimously disagree. The effects of crop failures were quickly felt, especially in Italy and the neighboring countries, where a continuous rain lasting four months had ruined the seeds. In the larger cities, they were forced, 17in the spring of 1347, to distribute bread to the poor, particularly in Florence, where they set up large bakehouses that, in April, distributed ninety-four thousand loaves of bread, each weighing twelve ounces, every day[49]. It's clear, however, that humanity could only ease the widespread suffering to some extent, not eliminate it entirely.

Diseases, the invariable consequence of famine, broke out in the country, as well as in cities; children died of hunger in their mothers’ arms,—want, misery and despair, were general throughout Christendom[50].

Diseases, the inevitable result of famine, spread through the country and cities; children died from hunger in their mothers’ arms—poverty, suffering, and hopelessness were widespread throughout Christendom[50].

Such are the events which took place before the eruption of the Black Plague in Europe. Contemporaries have explained them after their own manner, and have thus, like their posterity, under similar circumstances, given a proof, that mortals possess neither senses nor intellectual powers sufficiently acute to comprehend the phenomena produced by the earth’s organism, much less scientifically to understand their effects. Superstition, selfishness in a thousand forms, the presumption of the schools, laid hold of unconnected facts. They vainly thought to comprehend the whole in the individual, and perceived not the universal spirit which, in intimate union with the mighty powers of nature, animates the movements of all existence, and permits not any phenomenon to originate from isolated causes. To attempt, five centuries after that age of desolation, to point out the causes of a cosmical commotion, which has never recurred to an equal extent,—to indicate scientifically the influences which called forth so terrific a poison in the bodies of men and animals, exceeds the limits of human understanding. If we are even now unable, with all the varied resources of an extended knowledge of nature, to define that condition of the atmosphere by which pestilences are generated, still less can we pretend to reason retrospectively from the nineteenth to the fourteenth century; but if we take a general view of the occurrences, that century will give us copious information, and, as applicable to all succeeding times, of high importance.

These are the events that occurred before the outbreak of the Black Plague in Europe. People at that time interpreted them in their own ways, and, like those who followed them, they showed that humans lack both the sensory and intellectual abilities needed to fully understand the phenomena caused by the Earth’s systems, let alone scientifically grasp their effects. Superstition, selfishness in many forms, and the arrogance of academia seized on unrelated facts. They mistakenly believed they could understand the whole through the individual, failing to recognize the universal spirit that, in close connection with the powerful forces of nature, drives all existence and prevents any phenomenon from arising from isolated causes. To try, five centuries later, to identify the causes of a cosmic disturbance that has never happened again on such a scale—to scientifically pinpoint the influences that produced such a deadly toxin in humans and animals—goes beyond human understanding. Even today, despite our extensive knowledge of nature, we cannot define the atmospheric conditions that lead to plagues, and it is even less feasible to reason backward from the nineteenth century to the fourteenth. However, if we take a broad look at the events, that century provides rich insights that remain highly relevant to all future times.

In the progress of connected natural phenomena, from East 18to West, that great law of nature is plainly revealed which has so often and evidently manifested itself in the earth’s organism, as well as in the state of nations dependent upon it. In the inmost depths of the globe, that impulse was given in the year 1333, which in uninterrupted succession for six-and-twenty years shook the surface of the earth, even to the western shores of Europe. From the very beginning the air partook of the terrestrial concussion, atmospherical waters overflowed the land, or its plants and animals perished under the scorching heat. The insect tribe was wonderfully called into life, as if animated beings were destined to complete the destruction which astral and telluric powers had begun. Thus did this dreadful work of nature advance from year to year; it was a progressive infection of the Zones, which exerted a powerful influence both above and beneath the surface of the earth; and after having been perceptible in slighter indications, at the commencement of the terrestrial commotions in China, convulsed the whole earth.

In the ongoing series of interconnected natural events, from East 18 to West, that great law of nature is clearly revealed, as it has often shown itself in the earth’s ecosystem and in the states that rely on it. Deep within the earth, an impulse was set in motion in the year 1333, which, for twenty-six uninterrupted years, shook the surface of the planet, reaching the western shores of Europe. From the very start, the air felt the effects of this terrestrial disturbance, atmospheric waters flooded the land, and its plants and animals suffered due to the intense heat. Insects were mysteriously brought to life, as if these animated creatures were meant to finish the destruction initiated by celestial and earth forces. This terrifying natural process progressed year by year; it was a spreading contagion of the Zones, strongly affecting both the surface and subsurface of the earth; and after it became noticeable in minor signs at the beginning of the earth’s upheavals in China, it led to turmoil across the entire globe.

The nature of the first plague in China is unknown. We have no certain intelligence of the disease, until it entered the western countries of Asia. Here it shewed itself as the oriental plague with inflammation of the lungs; in which form it probably also may have begun in China, that is to say, as a malady which spreads, more than any other, by contagion—a contagion, that, in ordinary pestilences, requires immediate contact, and only under unfavourable circumstances of rare occurrence is communicated by the mere approach to the sick. The share which this cause had in the spreading of the plague over the whole earth, was certainly very great: and the opinion that the Black Death might have been excluded from Western Europe, by good regulations, similar to those which are now in use, would have all the support of modern experience, provided it could be proved that this plague had been actually imported from the East; or that the oriental plague in general, whenever it appears in Europe, has its origin in Asia or Egypt. Such a proof, however, can by no means be produced so as to enforce conviction; for it would involve the impossible assumption, either that there is no essential difference between the degree of civilization of the European nations, in the most ancient and in modern times, or that detrimental circumstances, which have yielded only to the civilization of human society and the regular 19cultivation of countries, could not formerly keep up the glandular plague.

The nature of the first plague in China is unknown. We don’t have any clear information about the disease until it entered the western parts of Asia. Here, it showed up as the eastern plague with lung inflammation; this is likely how it started in China, as a disease that spreads more than any other through contagion—a contagion that, in typical outbreaks, requires direct contact and is only transmitted under unusual circumstances by just being near the sick. The role this played in spreading the plague worldwide was certainly significant: the belief that the Black Death could have been kept out of Western Europe through effective regulations, similar to those used today, would be strongly supported by modern experience, provided it could be shown that this plague was actually brought in from the East; or that the eastern plague, whenever it appears in Europe, originates from Asia or Egypt. However, such proof cannot be produced convincingly; it would involve the impossible assumption that there is no fundamental difference between the level of civilization of European nations in ancient times and today, or that harmful conditions, which have only been overcome by the advancement of human society and the systematic cultivation of lands, could not have previously sustained the glandular plague.

The plague was, however, known in Europe before nations were united by the bonds of commerce and social intercourse[51]; hence there is ground for supposing that it sprung up spontaneously, in consequence of the rude manner of living and the uncultivated state of the earth; influences which peculiarly favour the origin of severe diseases. Now, we need not go back to the earlier centuries, for the 14th itself, before it had half expired, was visited by five or six pestilences[52].

The plague was known in Europe even before countries were connected through trade and social interactions [51]; therefore, it’s reasonable to think that it arose on its own due to the rough living conditions and the undeveloped state of the land, factors that particularly promote the emergence of serious diseases. We don't need to look back to earlier centuries, as even the 14th century, before it was halfway through, experienced five or six outbreaks [52].

If, therefore, we consider the peculiar property of the plague, that, in countries which it has once visited, it remains for a long time in a milder form, and that the epidemic influences of 1342, when it had appeared for the last time, were particularly favourable to its unperceived continuance, till 1348, we come to the notion, that in this eventful year also, the germs of plague existed in Southern Europe, which might be vivified by atmospherical deteriorations; and that thus, at least in part, the Black Plague may have originated in Europe itself. The corruption of the atmosphere came from the East; but the disease itself came not upon the wings of the wind, but was only excited and increased by the atmosphere where it had previously existed.

If we think about the unique nature of the plague, we see that in countries it has affected, it lingers for a long time in a milder form. The epidemic conditions of 1342, when it appeared for the last time, were especially conducive to its unnoticed persistence until 1348. This leads us to believe that in that significant year, the germs of the plague were present in Southern Europe, waiting to be activated by atmospheric changes. Therefore, at least in part, the Black Plague may have started in Europe itself. The atmospheric corruption came from the East; however, the disease didn't arrive riding the winds but was instead stimulated and intensified by the environment where it had previously been present.

This source of the Black Plague was not, however, the only one; for, far more powerful than the excitement of the latent elements of the plague by atmospheric influences, was the effect of the contagion communicated from one people to another, on the great roads, and in the harbours of the Mediterranean. From China, the route of the caravans lay to the north of the Caspian Sea, through Central Asia, to Tauris. Here ships were ready to take the produce of the East to Constantinople, the capital of commerce, and the medium of connexion between Asia, Europe and Africa[53]. Other caravans went from India to 20Asia Minor, and touched at the cities south of the Caspian Sea, and lastly from Bagdad, through Arabia to Egypt; also the maritime communication on the Red Sea, from India to Arabia and Egypt, was not inconsiderable. In all these directions contagion made its way; and doubtless, Constantinople and the harbours of Asia Minor, are to be regarded as the foci of infection; whence it radiated to the most distant seaports and islands.

This source of the Black Plague wasn’t the only one; far more impactful than the excitement of the hidden elements of the plague due to atmospheric conditions was the effect of the contagion spreading from one population to another along the main routes and in the harbors of the Mediterranean. From China, the caravan route went north of the Caspian Sea, through Central Asia, to Tauris. Here, ships were ready to transport goods from the East to Constantinople, the hub of trade and the link between Asia, Europe, and Africa[53]. Other caravans traveled from India to 20Asia Minor, stopping at cities south of the Caspian Sea, and finally from Baghdad, through Arabia to Egypt; the maritime routes across the Red Sea from India to Arabia and Egypt were also significant. In all these directions, contagion spread; and undoubtedly, Constantinople and the harbors of Asia Minor should be seen as the focal points of infection, from which it radiated to the most distant seaports and islands.

To Constantinople, the plague had been brought from the northern coast of the Black Sea[54], after it had depopulated the countries between those routes of commerce; and appeared as early as 1347, in Cyprus, Sicily, Marseilles and some of the seaports of Italy. The remaining islands of the Mediterranean, particularly Sardinia, Corsica and Majorca, were visited in succession. Foci of contagion existed also in full activity along the whole southern coast of Europe; when, in January 1348, the plague appeared in Avignon[55], and in other cities in the south of France and north of Italy, as well as in Spain.

To Constantinople, the plague was brought from the northern coast of the Black Sea[54], after it had wiped out populations in the regions along those trade routes; it first showed up as early as 1347, in Cyprus, Sicily, Marseilles, and some of the seaports in Italy. The remaining islands of the Mediterranean, especially Sardinia, Corsica, and Majorca, were affected one after another. Areas of infection were also actively spreading along the entire southern coast of Europe; then, in January 1348, the plague surfaced in Avignon[55], as well as in other cities in southern France and northern Italy, and in Spain.

The precise days of its eruption in the individual towns, are no longer to be ascertained; but it was not simultaneous; for in Florence, the disease appeared in the beginning of April[56]; in Cesena, the 1st of June[57]; and place after place was attacked throughout the whole year; so that the plague, after it had passed through the whole of France and Germany, where, however, it did not make its ravages until the following year, did not break out till August, in England; where it advanced so gradually, that a period of three months elapsed before it reached London[58]. The northern kingdoms were attacked by it in 1349. Sweden, indeed, not until November of that year: almost two years after its eruption in Avignon[59]. Poland received the plague in 1349, probably from Germany[60], if not from the northern countries; but in Russia, it did not make its appearance until 1351, more than three years after it had broken out in Constantinople. Instead of advancing in a north-westerly 21direction from Tauris and from the Caspian Sea, it had thus made the great circuit of the Black Sea, by way of Constantinople, Southern and Central Europe, England, the northern kingdoms and Poland, before it reached the Russian territories; a phenomenon which has not again occurred with respect to more recent pestilences originating in Asia.

The exact dates of its outbreak in individual towns can no longer be determined, but it wasn't simultaneous; in Florence, the disease first appeared in early April[56]; in Cesena, on June 1st[57]; and one place after another was hit throughout the entire year. The plague, after sweeping through France and Germany—where it didn’t wreak havoc until the following year—didn’t break out in England until August, advancing so slowly that it took three months to reach London[58]. The northern kingdoms were hit by it in 1349. Sweden, in fact, didn't see it until November of that year, nearly two years after its outbreak in Avignon[59]. Poland faced the plague in 1349, likely from Germany[60], if not from the northern regions; however, in Russia, it didn’t show up until 1351, more than three years after it had first emerged in Constantinople. Instead of moving in a north-westerly direction from Tauris and the Caspian Sea, it took a lengthy route around the Black Sea through Constantinople, Southern and Central Europe, England, the northern kingdoms, and Poland before finally reaching Russia; a pattern that hasn't been observed with more recent pandemics originating in Asia.

Whether any difference existed between the indigenous plague, excited by the influence of the atmosphere, and that which was imported by contagion, can no longer be ascertained from facts; for the contemporaries, who in general were not competent to make accurate researches of this kind, have left no data on the subject. A milder and a more malignant form certainly existed, and the former was not always derived from the latter, as is to be supposed from this circumstance—that the spitting of blood, the infallible diagnostic of the latter, on the first breaking out of the plague, is not similarly mentioned in all the reports; and it is therefore probable, that the milder form belonged to the native plague,—the more malignant, to that introduced by contagion. Contagion was, however, in itself, only one of many causes which gave rise to the Black Plague.

Whether there was any difference between the native plague, triggered by atmospheric conditions, and the one brought in by contagion can no longer be determined from existing facts. The people of that time, who generally weren't capable of conducting thorough investigations of this kind, didn't leave behind any data on the matter. A milder form and a more severe form undoubtedly existed, and the milder one didn't always come from the more severe one, as suggested by the fact that the coughing up of blood, the unmistakable sign of the more severe form, isn't consistently reported at the onset of the plague. Therefore, it's likely that the milder form was linked to the native plague, while the more severe form was associated with contagion. However, contagion was just one of many factors that contributed to the outbreak of the Black Plague.

This disease was a consequence of violent commotions in the earth’s organism—if any disease of cosmical origin can be so considered. One spring set a thousand others in motion for the annihilation of living beings, transient or permanent, of mediate or immediate effect. The most powerful of all was contagion; for in the most distant countries which had scarcely yet heard the echo of the first concussion, the people fell a sacrifice to organic poison,—the untimely offspring of vital energies thrown into violent commotion.

This disease was the result of violent disturbances in the earth's system—if any disease from outer space can be viewed that way. One event triggered a thousand others aimed at the destruction of living beings, whether temporary or permanent, with both immediate and long-term effects. The strongest of all was contagion; even in distant lands that had barely heard the first shock, people fell victim to organic poison—the unexpected byproduct of vital energies thrown into chaos.


CHAPTER IV.

MORTALITY.

We have no certain measure by which to estimate the ravages of the Black Plague, if numerical statements were wanted, as in modern times. Let us go back for a moment to the 14th century. The people were yet but little civilized. The church22 had indeed subdued them; but they all suffered from the ill consequences of their original rudeness. The dominion of the law was not yet confirmed. Sovereigns had everywhere to combat powerful enemies to internal tranquillity and security. The cities were fortresses for their own defence. Marauders encamped on the roads.—The husbandman was a feodal slave, without possessions of his own.—Rudeness was general.—Humanity, as yet unknown to the people.—Witches and heretics were burned alive.—Gentle rulers were contemned as weak;—wild passions, severity and cruelty, everywhere predominated.—Human life was little regarded.—Governments concerned not themselves about the numbers of their subjects, for whose welfare it was incumbent on them to provide. Thus, the first requisite for estimating the loss of human life, namely, a knowledge of the amount of the population, is altogether wanting; and, moreover, the traditional statements of the amount of this loss, are so vague, that from this source likewise, there is only room for probable conjecture.

We have no clear way to estimate the destruction caused by the Black Plague, as we would expect in modern times with numerical data. Let's take a moment to look back at the 14th century. People were still not very civilized. The church22 had indeed controlled them, but they all suffered from the negative effects of their initial harshness. The rule of law was not yet established. Rulers everywhere had to fight powerful enemies to maintain peace and security. Cities were fortresses for their own protection. Robbers camped along the roads. The farmer was a feudal slave, with no possessions of his own. Brutish behavior was common. Humanity was not yet recognized by the people. Witches and heretics were burned alive. Kind rulers were seen as weak; wild emotions, harshness, and cruelty were everywhere. Human life was not highly valued. Governments did not concern themselves with the number of their citizens for whose welfare they were supposed to care. Thus, the first requirement for assessing the loss of human life, which is knowledge of the population size, is completely lacking; moreover, the traditional accounts of this loss are so vague that they allow for only speculative guesses.

Kairo lost daily, when the plague was raging with its greatest violence, from 10 to 15,000; being as many as, in modern times, great plagues have carried off during their whole course. In China, more than thirteen millions are said to have died; and this is in correspondence with the certainly exaggerated accounts from the rest of Asia. India was depopulated. Tartary, the Tartar kingdom of Kaptschak, Mesopotamia, Syria, Armenia, were covered with dead bodies—the Kurds fled in vain to the mountains. In Caramania and Cæsarea, none were left alive. On the roads,—in the camps,—in the caravansaries,—unburied bodies alone were seen; and a few cities only (Arabian historians name Maara el nooman, Schisur and Harem) remained, in an unaccountable manner, free. In Aleppo, 500 died daily; 22,000 people, and most of the animals, were carried off in Gaza, within six weeks. Cyprus lost almost all its inhabitants[61]; and ships without crews were often seen in the Mediterranean; as afterwards in the North Sea, driving about, and spreading the plague wherever they went on shore[62]. It was reported to Pope Clement, at Avignon, that throughout the East, probably with the exception of China, 23,840,000 people had fallen victims to the plague[63]. Considering the occurrences 23of the 14th and 15th centuries, we might, on first view, suspect the accuracy of this statement. How (it might be asked) could such great wars have been carried on—such powerful efforts have been made; how could the Greek empire, only a hundred years later, have been overthrown, if the people really had been so utterly destroyed?

Kairo lost daily, when the plague was at its worst, between 10,000 to 15,000 people; that’s as many as great plagues in modern times have taken during their entire duration. In China, more than thirteen million are said to have died, which aligns with the probably exaggerated reports from the rest of Asia. India was depopulated. Tartary, the Tartar kingdom of Kaptschak, Mesopotamia, Syria, and Armenia were filled with dead bodies—the Kurds fled in vain to the mountains. In Caramania and Cæsarea, there was no one left alive. On the roads, in the camps, in the inns, only unburied bodies were seen; and only a few cities (Arabian historians mention Maara el Nooman, Schisur, and Harem) somehow remained free. In Aleppo, 500 died each day; 22,000 people, along with most of the animals, were lost in Gaza within six weeks. Cyprus lost almost all its population[61]; and ships without crews were often spotted in the Mediterranean; later, in the North Sea, drifting about and spreading the plague wherever they landed[62]. It was reported to Pope Clement in Avignon that throughout the East, likely excluding China, 23,840,000 people had fallen victim to the plague[63]. Considering the events 23 of the 14th and 15th centuries, we might initially doubt the accuracy of this claim. How could such great wars have been fought—such powerful efforts made; how could the Greek empire, only a hundred years later, have been overthrown if the population had truly been so completely devastated?

This account is nevertheless rendered credible by the ascertained fact, that the palaces of princes are less accessible to contagious diseases than the dwellings of the multitude; and that in places of importance, the influx from those districts which have suffered least, soon repairs even the heaviest losses. We must remember, also, that we do not gather much from mere numbers without an intimate knowledge of the state of society. We will, therefore, confine ourselves to exhibiting some of the more credible accounts relative to European cities.

This account is still believable because it's been proven that royal palaces are less vulnerable to infectious diseases than the homes of ordinary people; and in major cities, the arrival of people from areas that have been less affected quickly makes up for even the worst losses. We also need to keep in mind that just looking at numbers doesn't tell us much without a deep understanding of the society involved. So, we will limit ourselves to presenting some of the more reliable accounts concerning European cities.

In Florence there died of the Black Plague
60,000[64]
In Venice
100,000[65]
In Marseilles, in one month
16,000[66]
In Siena
70,000[67]
In Paris
50,000[68]
In St. Denys
14,000[69]
In Avignon
60,000[70]
In Strasburg
16,000[71]
In Lübeck
9,000[72]
In Basle
14,000     
In Erfurt, at least
16,000     
In Weimar
5,000[73]
In Limburg
2,500[74]
In London, at least
100,000[75]
In Norwich
51,100[76]
    To which may be added—  
Franciscan Friars in Germany
124,434[77]
Minorites in Italy
30,000[78]

24

24

This short catalogue might, by a laborious and uncertain calculation, deduced from other sources, be easily further multiplied, but would still fail to give a true picture of the depopulation which took place. Lübeck, at that time the Venice of the North, which could no longer contain the multitudes that flocked to it, was thrown into such consternation on the eruption of the plague, that the citizens destroyed themselves as if in frenzy.

This brief catalog could, with a complicated and uncertain calculation based on other sources, be easily expanded further, but it would still not accurately represent the depopulation that occurred. Lübeck, then known as the Venice of the North, which could no longer hold the crowds that came to it, was thrown into such panic when the plague broke out that the citizens turned on themselves as if they were in a frenzy.

Merchants whose earnings and possessions were unbounded, coldly and willingly renounced their earthly goods. They carried their treasures to monasteries and churches, and laid them at the foot of the altar; but gold had no charms for the monks, for it brought them death. They shut their gates; yet, still it was cast to them over the convent walls. People would brook no impediment to the last pious work to which they were driven by despair. When the plague ceased, men thought they were still wandering among the dead, so appalling was the livid aspect of the survivors, in consequence of the anxiety they had 25undergone, and the unavoidable infection of the air[79]. Many other cities probably presented a similar appearance; and it is ascertained that a great number of small country towns and villages which have been estimated, and not too highly, at 200,000[80], were bereft of all their inhabitants.

Merchants whose wealth and possessions were limitless coldly and willingly gave up their worldly goods. They brought their treasures to monasteries and churches and placed them at the altar; however, gold meant nothing to the monks because it brought them death. They locked their gates, but people still threw gifts over the convent walls. People wouldn’t let anything stop them from performing the last pious acts driven by their despair. When the plague ended, men felt like they were still surrounded by the dead, so shocking was the pale look of the survivors, due to the stress they had gone through and the inevitable contamination in the air[79]. Many other cities likely looked the same, and it's confirmed that a large number of small towns and villages, estimated—not overly—at 200,000[80], lost all their inhabitants.

In many places in France not more than two out of twenty of the inhabitants were left alive[81], and the capital felt the fury of the plague, alike in the palace and the cot.

In many parts of France, no more than two out of every twenty residents were still alive[81], and the capital experienced the wrath of the plague, affecting everyone from royalty to commoners.

Two queens[82], one bishop[83], and great numbers of other distinguished persons, fell a sacrifice to it, and more than 500 a day died in the Hôtel-Dieu, under the faithful care of the sisters of charity, whose disinterested courage, in this age of horror, displayed the most beautiful traits of human virtue. For although they lost their lives, evidently from contagion, and their numbers were several times renewed, there was still no want of fresh candidates, who, strangers to the unchristian fear of death, piously devoted themselves to their holy calling.

Two queens[82], one bishop[83], and many other notable figures fell victim to it, and more than 500 people died each day at the Hôtel-Dieu, under the devoted care of the sisters of charity, whose selfless bravery, in this time of horror, showcased the best qualities of human virtue. Even though they lost their lives, clearly due to the infection, and their ranks were replenished several times, there was still no shortage of new applicants, who, untroubled by the unchristian fear of death, faithfully dedicated themselves to their sacred mission.

The churchyards were soon unable to contain the dead[84], and many houses, left without inhabitants, fell to ruins.

The churchyards quickly ran out of space for the dead[84], and many homes, abandoned by their residents, fell into disrepair.

In Avignon, the pope found it necessary to consecrate the Rhone, that bodies might be thrown into the river without delay, as the churchyards would no longer hold them[85]; so likewise, in all populous cities, extraordinary measures were adopted, in order speedily to dispose of the dead. In Vienna, where for some time 1200 inhabitants died daily[86], the interment of corpses in the churchyards and within the churches, was forthwith prohibited; and the dead were then arranged in layers, by thousands, in six large pits outside the city[87], as had already been 26done in Cairo, and Paris. Yet, still many were secretly buried; for at all times, the people are attached to the consecrated cemeteries of their dead, and will not renounce the customary mode of interment.

In Avignon, the pope felt it was necessary to bless the Rhone so that bodies could be thrown into the river without delay, since the churchyards were no longer able to hold them[85]; similarly, in all crowded cities, exceptional measures were taken to quickly deal with the dead. In Vienna, where for some time 1,200 people were dying each day[86], burying corpses in churchyards and churches was immediately banned; instead, the dead were laid out in layers, by the thousands, in six large pits outside the city[87], as had already been done in Cairo and Paris. Yet, many were still buried in secret; because at all times, people feel a connection to the consecrated burial sites of their loved ones and will not give up the traditional way of burial.

In many places, it was rumoured that plague patients were buried alive[88], as may sometimes happen through senseless alarm and indecent haste; and thus the horror of the distressed people was everywhere increased. In Erfurt, after the churchyards were filled, 12,000 corpses were thrown into eleven great pits; and the like might, more or less exactly, be stated with respect to all the larger cities[89]. Funeral ceremonies, the last consolation of the survivors, were everywhere impracticable.

In many places, it was rumored that plague patients were buried alive, which can sometimes occur due to irrational fear and reckless haste; as a result, the terror of the suffering people grew everywhere. In Erfurt, after the graveyards were full, 12,000 bodies were dumped into eleven large pits; similar situations could be reported for all the larger cities. Funeral services, the last comfort for the survivors, were impossible everywhere.

In all Germany, according to a probable calculation, there seem to have died only 1,244,434[90] inhabitants; this country, however, was more spared than others: Italy, on the contrary, was most severely visited. It is said to have lost half its inhabitants[91]; and this account is rendered credible from the immense losses of individual cities and provinces: for in Sardinia and Corsica, according to the account of the distinguished Florentine, John Villani, who was himself carried off by the Black Plague[92], scarcely a third part of the population remained alive; and it is related of the Venetians, that they engaged ships at a high rate to retreat to the islands; so that after the plague had carried off three fourths of her inhabitants, that proud city was left forlorn and desolate[93]. In Padua, after the cessation of the plague, two thirds of the inhabitants were wanting; and in Florence it was prohibited to publish the numbers of the dead, and to toll the bells at their funerals, in order that the living might not abandon themselves to despair[94].

In all of Germany, it's estimated that only 1,244,434 inhabitants died; this country, however, suffered less than others: Italy, on the other hand, was hit the hardest. It's said to have lost half its population; this claim is supported by the massive losses in individual cities and regions. In Sardinia and Corsica, according to the account of the renowned Florentine, John Villani, who himself succumbed to the Black Plague, barely a third of the population survived; and it's reported that the Venetians hired ships at a high cost to escape to the islands, so that after the plague took away three-fourths of its inhabitants, that proud city was left abandoned and desolate. In Padua, after the plague ended, two-thirds of the population were gone; and in Florence, it was forbidden to announce the number of the dead or ring the bells at their funerals, so that the living wouldn't fall into despair.

We have more exact accounts of England; most of the great cities suffered incredible losses; above all, Yarmouth, in which, 7052 died: Bristol, Oxford, Norwich, Leicester, York 27and London where, in one burial ground alone, there were interred upwards of 50,000 corpses, arranged in layers, in large pits[95]. It is said, that in the whole country, scarcely a tenth part remained alive[96]; but this estimate is evidently too high. Smaller losses were sufficient to cause those convulsions, whose consequences were felt for some centuries, in a false impulse given to civil life, and whose indirect influence, unknown to the English, has, perhaps, extended even to modern times.

We have more detailed records from England; most of the major cities faced devastating losses; especially Yarmouth, where 7,052 people died: Bristol, Oxford, Norwich, Leicester, York 27 and London, where in just one burial ground, over 50,000 bodies were buried, stacked in layers in large pits[95]. It’s said that across the entire country, barely a tenth of the population survived[96]; although this estimate is clearly too high. Even smaller losses were enough to trigger those upheavals, the effects of which were felt for centuries, creating an unsettling shift in civil life, and whose indirect impact, unknown to the English, may have even reached modern times.

Morals were deteriorated everywhere, and the service of God was, in a great measure, laid aside; for, in many places, the churches were deserted, being bereft of their priests. The instruction of the people was impeded[97]; covetousness became general; and when tranquillity was restored, the great increase of lawyers was astonishing, to whom the endless disputes regarding inheritances, offered a rich harvest. The want of priests too, throughout the country, operated very detrimentally upon the people, (the lower classes being most exposed to the ravages of the plague, whilst the houses of the nobility were, in proportion, much more spared,) and it was no compensation that whole bands of ignorant laymen, who had lost their wives during the pestilence, crowded into the monastic orders, that they might participate in the respectability of the priesthood, and in the rich heritages which fell in to the church from all quarters. The sittings of Parliament, of the King’s Bench, and of most of the other courts, were suspended as long as the malady raged. The laws of peace availed not during the dominion of death. Pope Clement took advantage of this state of disorder, to adjust the bloody quarrel between Edward III. and Philip VI.; yet he only succeeded during the period that the plague commanded peace. Philip’s death (1350) annulled all treaties; and it is related, that Edward, with other troops indeed, but with the same leaders and knights, again took the field. Ireland was much less heavily visited than England. The disease seems to have scarcely reached the mountainous districts of that kingdom; and Scotland too would, perhaps, 28have remained free, had not the Scots availed themselves of the discomfiture of the English, to make an irruption into their territory, which terminated in the destruction of their army, by the plague and by the sword, and the extension of the pestilence, through those who escaped, over the whole country.

Morals were declining everywhere, and many people had mostly abandoned the service of God; in many places, the churches were empty, lacking priests. Teaching the community was hindered[97]; greed became common; and when peace was restored, the sudden rise in the number of lawyers was shocking, as endless disputes over inheritances provided them with plenty of work. The shortage of priests across the country was very harmful to the people, especially the lower classes who suffered the most from the plague, while the wealthy were relatively spared. It didn't help that groups of uneducated laypeople, who had lost their wives to the disease, flocked to monastic orders to gain the respect that came with being a priest and to claim the rich inheritances that were coming to the church from all sides. Sessions of Parliament, the King’s Bench, and most other courts were suspended as long as the plague persisted. The laws of peace meant nothing during the reign of death. Pope Clement took advantage of this chaos to try to resolve the bloody conflict between Edward III and Philip VI; however, he only managed to do so while the plague enforced a temporary peace. Philip’s death in 1350 canceled all agreements; it’s said that Edward, along with other troops but the same leaders and knights, took the field again. Ireland was hit much less severely than England. The disease barely seemed to reach the mountainous areas of that kingdom; and Scotland would likely have remained untouched, had the Scots not seized the opportunity of the English defeat to invade their territory, which resulted in the destruction of their army by the disease and by battle, spreading the plague to the entire country through those who survived.

At the commencement, there was in England a superabundance of all the necessaries of life; but the plague, which seemed then to be the sole disease, was soon accompanied by a fatal murrain among the cattle. Wandering about without herdsmen, they fell by thousands; and, as has likewise been observed in Africa, the birds and beasts of prey are said not to have touched them. Of what nature this murrain may have been, can no more be determined, than whether it originated from communication with plague patients, or from other causes; but thus much is certain, that it did not break out until after the commencement of the Black Death. In consequence of this murrain, and the impossibility of removing the corn from the fields, there was everywhere a great rise in the price of food which to many was inexplicable, because the harvest had been plentiful; by others it was attributed to the wicked designs of the labourers and dealers; but it really had its foundation in the actual deficiency arising from circumstances by which individual classes at all times endeavour to profit. For a whole year, until it terminated in August, 1349, the Black Plague prevailed in this beautiful island, and everywhere poisoned the springs of comfort and prosperity[98].

At the beginning, England had an abundance of all the essentials for life; however, the plague, which seemed to be the only disease at that time, was soon followed by a deadly sickness among the cattle. The animals wandered around without herders and died by the thousands; and, as has also been observed in Africa, the birds and predatory animals reportedly didn't touch them. The exact nature of this cattle sickness is still unknown, just like it’s unclear whether it was caused by contact with plague sufferers or from other reasons; but what is certain is that it didn't break out until after the start of the Black Death. Because of this cattle sickness, and the inability to harvest the corn from the fields, there was a significant increase in food prices everywhere, which many found puzzling because the harvest had been good; some blamed the greedy actions of the workers and merchants; but the reality was that it stemmed from an actual shortage created by circumstances that various groups always try to take advantage of. For a full year, until it ended in August 1349, the Black Plague spread through this beautiful island, poisoning the sources of comfort and prosperity everywhere.[98].

In other countries, it generally lasted only half a year, but returned frequently in individual places; on which account, some, without sufficient proof, assigned to it a period of seven years[99].

In other countries, it usually lasted only six months, but showed up repeatedly in certain areas; for this reason, some, without solid evidence, attributed it a duration of seven years[99].

Spain was uninterruptedly ravaged by the Black Plague till after the year 1350, to which the frequent internal feuds and the wars with the Moors not a little contributed. Alphonso XI., whose passion for war carried him too far, died of it at the siege of Gibraltar, on the 26th of March, 1350. He was the only king in Europe who fell a sacrifice to it; but even before this period, innumerable families had been thrown into affliction[100]. 29The mortality seems otherwise to have been smaller in Spain than in Italy, and about as considerable as in France.

Spain was constantly devastated by the Black Plague until after 1350, which was worsened by ongoing internal conflicts and wars with the Moors. King Alfonso XI, whose obsession with war led him too far, died from it during the siege of Gibraltar on March 26, 1350. He was the only king in Europe to fall victim to it; however, even before this time, countless families had suffered great hardship. A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__. 29The death toll appears to have been lower in Spain compared to Italy and about the same as in France.

The whole period during which the Black Plague raged with destructive violence in Europe, was, with the exception of Russia, from the year 1347 to 1350. The plagues, which in the sequel often returned until the year 1383[101], we do not consider as belonging to “the Great Mortality.” They were rather common pestilences, without inflammation of the lungs, such as in former times, and in the following centuries, were excited by the matter of contagion everywhere existing, and which, on every favourable occasion, gained ground anew, as is usually the case with this frightful disease.

The entire time the Black Plague spread violently across Europe, except for Russia, was from 1347 to 1350. The outbreaks that followed, which continued until 1383[101], are not considered part of “the Great Mortality.” Instead, they were more like common illnesses without lung inflammation, similar to those seen in earlier and later centuries, caused by the existing contagion that, whenever conditions were right, reemerged, as typically happens with this terrifying disease.

The concourse of large bodies of people was especially dangerous; and thus, the premature celebration of the Jubilee, to which Clement VI. cited the faithful to Rome, (1350,) during the great epidemic, caused a new eruption of the plague, from which it is said, that scarcely one in an hundred of the pilgrims escaped[102].

The gathering of large crowds was particularly risky; and so, the early celebration of the Jubilee, which Clement VI. called the faithful to Rome for in 1350 during the major epidemic, led to a new outbreak of the plague, from which it's said that barely one in a hundred of the pilgrims survived.[102]

Italy was, in consequence, depopulated anew; and those who returned, spread poison and corruption of morals in all directions[103]. It is, therefore, the less apparent, how that Pope, who was in general so wise and considerate, and who knew how to pursue the path of reason and humanity, under the most difficult circumstances, should have been led to adopt a measure so injurious; since he, himself, was so convinced of the salutary effect of seclusion, that during the plague in Avignon, he kept up constant fires, and suffered no one to approach him[104]; and, in other respects, gave such orders as averted, or alleviated, much misery.

Italy was once again depopulated, and those who returned spread poison and moral corruption everywhere[103]. It’s less clear how that Pope, who was generally so wise and considerate, and who knew how to navigate the path of reason and humanity even in the toughest situations, ended up taking such a harmful action; after all, he was convinced of the beneficial effects of isolation, as during the plague in Avignon, he kept constant fires burning and didn’t let anyone near him[104]; in other ways, he issued orders that prevented or eased a lot of suffering.

The changes which occurred about this period in the north of Europe, are sufficiently memorable to claim a few moments’ attention. In Sweden two princes died—Håken and Knut, half-brothers of King Magnus; and in Westgothland alone, 466 priests[105]. The inhabitants of Iceland and Greenland, found in 30the coldness of their inhospitable climate, no protection against the southern enemy who had penetrated to them from happier countries. The plague caused great havoc among them. Nature made no allowance for their constant warfare with the elements, and the parsimony with which she had meted out to them the enjoyments of life[106]. In Denmark and Norway, however, people were so occupied with their own misery, that the accustomed voyages to Greenland ceased. Towering icebergs formed at the same time on the coast of East Greenland, in consequence of the general concussion of the earth’s organism; and no mortal, from that time forward, has ever seen that shore or its inhabitants[107].

The changes that happened during this time in Northern Europe are memorable enough to deserve a moment’s attention. In Sweden, two princes died—Håken and Knut, who were half-brothers of King Magnus; and in Westgothland alone, 466 priests [105]. The people of Iceland and Greenland found no protection against the southern enemy that had come to them from more favorable lands, despite the cold of their harsh climate. The plague caused massive destruction among them. Nature offered no relief from their ongoing struggles against the elements, and she had been stingy in providing them the pleasures of life [106]. In Denmark and Norway, however, people were so consumed by their own suffering that the usual voyages to Greenland stopped. At the same time, massive icebergs formed along the coast of East Greenland due to the overall disturbance of the earth’s structure; and since then, no one has ever seen that shore or its inhabitants again [107].

It has been observed above, that in Russia, the Black Plague did not break out until 1351, after it had already passed through the south and north of Europe. In this country also, the mortality was extraordinarily great; and the same scenes of affliction and despair were exhibited, as had occurred in those nations which had already passed the ordeal. The same mode of burial—the same horrible certainty of death—the same torpor and depression of spirits. The wealthy abandoned their treasures, and gave their villages and estates to the churches and monasteries; this being, according to the notions of the age, the surest way of securing the favour of Heaven and the forgiveness of past sins. In Russia too, the voice of nature was silenced by fear and horror. In the hour of danger, fathers and mothers deserted their children, and children their parents[108].

It has been noted above that in Russia, the Black Plague didn't break out until 1351, after it had already swept through southern and northern Europe. The death toll in this country was also exceptionally high, and the same scenes of suffering and despair were evident as those that had already taken place in the nations that endured the crisis. The same methods of burial—the same grim certainty of death—the same numbness and hopelessness were present. Wealthy individuals abandoned their riches, giving their villages and estates to churches and monasteries; this was, according to the beliefs of the time, the best way to gain God's favor and secure forgiveness for past sins. In Russia as well, the voice of nature was drowned out by fear and horror. In times of danger, fathers and mothers abandoned their children, and children left their parents[108].

Of all the estimates of the number of lives lost in Europe, the most probable is, that altogether, a fourth part of the inhabitants were carried off. Now, if Europe at present contain 210,000,000 inhabitants, the population, not to take a higher estimate, which might easily be justified, amounted to at least 105,000,000 in the 16th century.

Of all the estimates of the number of lives lost in Europe, the most likely is that about a quarter of the population was wiped out. Now, if Europe currently has 210,000,000 people, the population—without going for a higher estimate, which could easily be justified—was at least 105,000,000 in the 16th century.

It may, therefore, be assumed, without exaggeration, that Europe lost during the Black Death, 25,000,000 of inhabitants.

It can, therefore, be assumed, without exaggeration, that Europe lost around 25 million people during the Black Death.

31

31

That her nations could so quickly overcome such a fearful concussion in their external circumstances, and, in general, without retrograding more than they actually did, could so develope their energies in the following century, is a most convincing proof of the indestructibility of human society as a whole. To assume, however, that it did not suffer any essential change internally, because in appearance every thing remained as before, is inconsistent with a just view of cause and effect. Many historians seem to have adopted such an opinion; accustomed, as usual, to judge of the moral condition of the people solely according to the vicissitudes of earthly power, the events of battles, and the influence of religion, but to pass over with indifference, the great phenomena of nature, which modify, not only the surface of the earth, but also the human mind. Hence, most of them have touched but superficially on the “great mortality” of the 14th century. We, for our parts, are convinced, that in the history of the world, the Black Death is one of the most important events which have prepared the way for the present state of Europe.

That her nations were able to quickly recover from such a terrifying shock to their circumstances, and, in general, without regressing more than they actually did, could develop their strengths in the following century, is strong evidence of the resilience of human society as a whole. However, to claim that it did not undergo any significant internal change just because everything looked the same on the surface is inconsistent with a proper understanding of cause and effect. Many historians seem to have taken such a stance; they are typically inclined to judge the moral condition of people solely based on shifts in earthly power, the outcomes of battles, and the influence of religion, while neglecting to acknowledge the major natural phenomena that affect not only the surface of the earth but also the human mind. As a result, most of them have only superficially addressed the “great mortality” of the 14th century. We, on our part, believe that in the history of the world, the Black Death is one of the most significant events that has shaped the current state of Europe.

He who studies the human mind with attention, and forms a deliberate judgment on the intellectual powers which set people and states in motion, may, perhaps, find some proofs of this assertion in the following observations:—at that time, the advancement of the hierarchy was, in most countries, extraordinary; for the church acquired treasures and large properties in land, even to a greater extent than after the crusades; but experience has demonstrated, that such a state of things is ruinous to the people, and causes them to retrograde, as was evinced on this occasion.

Anyone who carefully studies the human mind and makes a thoughtful judgment about the intellectual forces that influence individuals and nations might find some evidence for this claim in the observations that follow: at that time, the growth of the hierarchy was remarkable in many countries; the church gained wealth and vast land holdings, even more than after the Crusades. However, experience has shown that this situation is harmful to the people and leads to their decline, as was evident in this case.

After the cessation of the Black Plague, a greater fecundity in women was everywhere remarkable—a grand phenomenon, which, from its occurrence after every destructive pestilence, proves to conviction, if any occurrence can do so, the prevalence of a higher power in the direction of general organic life. Marriages were, almost without exception, prolific; and double and treble births were more frequent than at other times; under which head, we should remember the strange remark, that after the “great mortality” the children were said to have got fewer teeth than before; at which contemporaries were mightily shocked, and even later writers have felt surprise.

After the end of the Black Plague, there was a notable increase in fertility among women everywhere—a significant phenomenon that, happening after every major epidemic, strongly suggests the influence of a higher power on the overall vitality of life. Almost all marriages were fruitful, and twins and triplets were born more frequently than at other times. In this context, we should note the peculiar observation that after the “great mortality,” children seemed to have fewer teeth than before, which surprised people at the time and continues to astonish later writers.

If we examine the grounds of this oft-repeated assertion, we32 shall find that they were astonished to see children cut twenty, or at most, twenty-two teeth, under the supposition that a greater number had formerly fallen to their share[109]. Some writers of authority, as, for example, the physician Savonarola[110], at Ferrara, who probably looked for twenty-eight teeth in children, published their opinions on this subject. Others copied from them, without seeing for themselves, as often happens in other matters which are equally evident; and thus the world believed in the miracle of an imperfection in the human body which had been caused by the Black Plague.

If we look into the basis of this often-repeated claim, we32 will find that they were surprised to see children develop twenty, or at most, twenty-two teeth, under the assumption that a larger number had previously been common. Some respected writers, like the physician Savonarola[110] from Ferrara, who likely expected to see twenty-eight teeth in children, shared their views on the matter. Others simply copied their opinions without verifying for themselves, which is something that often happens in various equally obvious issues. As a result, people came to believe in the myth of a flaw in the human body that arose from the Black Plague.

The people gradually consoled themselves after the sufferings which they had undergone; the dead were lamented and forgotten; and in the stirring vicissitudes of existence, the world belonged to the living[111].

The people slowly comforted themselves after the hardships they had faced; they mourned the dead and moved on; and in the ups and downs of life, the world belonged to the living[111].


CHAPTER V.

MORAL EFFECTS.

The mental shock sustained by all nations during the prevalence of the Black Plague, is without parallel and beyond description. In the eyes of the timorous, danger was the certain harbinger of death; many fell victims to fear, on the first appearance of the distemper[112], and the most stout-hearted lost their confidence. Thus, after reliance on the future had died away, the spiritual union which binds man to his family and his fellow creatures, was gradually dissolved. The pious closed their accounts with the world,—eternity presented itself to their view,—their only remaining desire, was for a participation in 33the consolations of religion, because to them death was disarmed of its sting.

The mental shock experienced by all nations during the Black Plague was unprecedented and indescribable. For the fearful, danger was a certain sign of death; many succumbed to fear at the first signs of the illness[112], and even the bravest lost their confidence. As hope for the future disappeared, the spiritual connection that binds people to their families and fellow human beings gradually fell apart. The devout wrapped up their affairs in this world—eternity loomed before them—their only remaining wish was to find comfort in 33religion, as to them, death had lost its power to hurt.

Repentance seized the transgressor, admonishing him to consecrate his remaining hours to the exercise of Christian virtues. All minds were directed to the contemplation of futurity; and children, who manifest the more elevated feelings of the soul without alloy, were frequently seen, while labouring under the plague, breathing out their spirit with prayer and songs of thanksgiving[113].

Repentance took hold of the sinner, urging him to dedicate his remaining hours to practicing Christian values. Everyone's thoughts turned to the contemplation of the future; and children, who show the purest emotions of the soul, were often seen, even while suffering from the plague, letting their spirits go through prayer and songs of gratitude[113].

An awful sense of contrition seized Christians of every communion; they resolved to forsake their vices, to make restitution for past offences, before they were summoned hence, to seek reconciliation with their Maker, and to avert, by self-chastisement, the punishment due to their former sins. Human nature would be exalted, could the countless noble actions, which, in times of most imminent danger, were performed in secret, be recorded for the instruction of future generations. They, however, have no influence on the course of worldly events. They are known only to silent eye-witnesses, and soon fall into oblivion. But hypocrisy, illusion and bigotry, stalk abroad undaunted; they desecrate what is noble, they pervert what is divine, to the unholy purposes of selfishness; which hurries along every good feeling in the false excitement of the age. Thus it was in the years of this plague. In the 14th century, the monastic system was still in its full vigour, the power of the ecclesiastical orders and brotherhoods was revered by the people, and the hierarchy was still formidable to the temporal power. It was, therefore, in the natural constitution of society that bigoted zeal, which in such times makes a show of public acts of penance, should avail itself of the semblance of religion. But this took place in such a manner, that unbridled, self-willed penitence, degenerated into lukewarmness, 34renounced obedience to the hierarchy, and prepared a fearful opposition to the church, paralysed as it was by antiquated forms.

A terrible feeling of remorse overwhelmed Christians from all denominations; they decided to give up their sins, make amends for their past wrongdoings, seek forgiveness from their Creator, and through self-discipline, avoid the consequences of their previous sins. Imagine how uplifted humanity could be if all the countless noble deeds done in secret during the most dangerous times were documented for future generations to learn from. However, these actions have no impact on the course of worldly events. They are known only to those who witnessed them silently and soon fade into obscurity. Meanwhile, hypocrisy, delusion, and bigotry roam freely; they tarnish what is noble and distort what is sacred for selfish ends, overwhelming every good sentiment with the false excitement of the times. That was the reality during the years of this plague. In the 14th century, the monastic system was still thriving, the power of religious orders and brotherhoods was respected by the people, and the hierarchy remained a formidable force against secular authority. Thus, it was a natural part of society for zealous bigotry, which in such times showcased public acts of penance, to take advantage of the appearance of religion. However, this unfolded in such a way that uncontrolled, willful penitence turned into indifference, abandoned obedience to the hierarchical structure, and set the stage for a terrifying opposition to the church, which was already weakened by outdated traditions.

While all countries were filled with lamentations and woe, there first arose in Hungary[114], and afterwards in Germany, the Brotherhood of the Flagellants, called also the Brethren of the Cross, or Cross-bearers, who took upon themselves the repentance of the people, for the sins they had committed, and offered prayers and supplications for the averting of this plague. This Order consisted chiefly of persons of the lower class, who were either actuated by sincere contrition, or, who joyfully availed themselves of this pretext for idleness, and were hurried along with the tide of distracting frenzy. But as these brotherhoods gained in repute, and were welcomed by the people, with veneration and enthusiasm, many nobles and ecclesiastics ranged themselves under their standard; and their bands were not unfrequently augmented by children, honourable women and nuns; so powerfully were minds of the most opposite temperaments enslaved by this infatuation[115]. They marched through the cities, in well organized processions, with leaders and singers; their heads covered as far as the eyes; their look fixed on the ground, accompanied by every token of the deepest contrition and mourning. They were robed in sombre garments, with red crosses on the breast, back, and cap, and bore triple scourges, tied in three or four knots, in which points of iron were fixed[116]. Tapers and magnificent banners of velvet and cloth of gold, were carried before them; wherever they made their appearance, they were welcomed by the ringing of the bells; and the people flocked from all quarters, to listen to their hymns and to witness their penance, with devotion and tears.

While all countries were filled with grief and sorrow, the Brotherhood of the Flagellants, also known as the Brethren of the Cross or Cross-bearers, first emerged in Hungary[114], and later in Germany. They dedicated themselves to repenting for the sins of the people and offered prayers to prevent the plague. This group mainly consisted of lower-class individuals, some genuinely remorseful and others using this as an excuse for laziness, swept up in the frenzy of the moment. As these brotherhoods gained popularity and were embraced by the people with reverence and enthusiasm, many nobles and clergy joined their ranks. Their numbers often included children, respectable women, and nuns, as people of very different backgrounds were caught up in this fervor[115]. They marched through the cities in organized processions, led by leaders and singers; their heads covered down to their eyes, with their gaze fixed on the ground, showing clear signs of deep remorse and mourning. They wore dark robes adorned with red crosses on their chest, back, and caps, and carried triple scourges tied with three or four knots, containing iron tips[116]. Candles and beautiful banners made of velvet and gold cloth were carried in front of them; wherever they went, they were greeted by the sound of ringing bells, and people gathered from all around to hear their hymns and witness their penance with devotion and tears.

In the year 1349, two hundred Flagellants first entered 35Strasburg, where they were received with great joy, and hospitably lodged by the citizens. Above a thousand joined the brotherhood, which now assumed the appearance of a wandering tribe, and separated into two bodies, for the purpose of journeying to the north and to the south. For more than half a year, new parties arrived weekly; and, on each arrival, adults and children left their families to accompany them; till, at length, their sanctity was questioned, and the doors of houses and churches were closed against them[117]. At Spires, two hundred boys, of twelve years of age and under, constituted themselves into a Brotherhood of the Cross, in imitation of the children, who, about a hundred years before, had united, at the instigation of some fanatic monks, for the purpose of recovering the Holy Sepulchre. All the inhabitants of this town were carried away by the illusion; they conducted the strangers to their houses with songs of thanksgiving, to regale them for the night. The women embroidered banners for them, and all were anxious to augment their pomp; and at every succeeding pilgrimage, their influence and reputation increased[118].

In 1349, two hundred Flagellants first arrived in 35Strasburg, where the citizens welcomed them with great joy and offered them hospitality. Over a thousand people joined the group, which began to resemble a wandering tribe, splitting into two groups to travel north and south. For more than six months, new members arrived weekly, and with each arrival, adults and children left their families to join them, until eventually, their holiness was questioned, and doors to houses and churches were shut against them[117]. In Spires, two hundred boys aged twelve and under formed a Brotherhood of the Cross, inspired by the children who had come together about a hundred years earlier under the influence of some fanatic monks to reclaim the Holy Sepulchre. The entire town was swept up in this delusion; they welcomed the newcomers into their homes with songs of gratitude to host them for the night. Women made banners for them, and everyone wanted to enhance their grandeur; with each pilgrimage, their power and prestige grew[118].

It was not merely some individual parts of the country that fostered them: all Germany, Hungary, Poland, Bohemia, Silesia, and Flanders, did homage to the mania; and they at length became as formidable to the secular, as they were to the ecclesiastical power. The influence of this fanaticism was great and threatening; resembling the excitement which called all the inhabitants of Europe into the deserts of Syria and Palestine, about two hundred and fifty years before. The appearance, in itself, was not novel. As far back as the 11th century, many believers, in Asia and Southern Europe, afflicted themselves with the punishment of flagellation. Dominicus Loricatus, a monk of St. Croce d’Avellano, is mentioned as the master and model of this species of mortification of the flesh; which, according to the primitive notions of the Asiatic Anchorites, was deemed eminently Christian. The author of the solemn processions of the Flagellants, is said to have been St. Anthony; for even in his time (1231), this kind of penance was so much in vogue, that it is recorded as an eventful circumstance in the history of the world. In 1260, the Flagellants appeared in Italy as Devoti. 36“When the land was polluted by vices and crimes[119], an unexampled spirit of remorse suddenly seized the minds of the Italians. The fear of Christ fell upon all: noble and ignoble, old and young, and even children of five years of age, marched through the streets with no covering but a scarf round the waist. They each carried a scourge of leathern thongs, which they applied to their limbs, amid sighs and tears, with such violence, that the blood flowed from the wounds. Not only during the day, but even by night, and in the severest winter, they traversed the cities with burning torches and banners, in thousands and tens of thousands, headed by their priests, and prostrated themselves before the altars. They proceeded in the same manner in the villages: and the woods and mountains resounded with the voices of those whose cries were raised to God. The melancholy chaunt of the penitent alone was heard. Enemies were reconciled; men and women vied with each other in splendid works of charity, as if they dreaded, that Divine Omnipotence would pronounce on them the doom of annihilation.”

It wasn't just certain areas of the country that nurtured them: all of Germany, Hungary, Poland, Bohemia, Silesia, and Flanders were swept up in the craze; and they eventually became as much of a threat to secular authorities as they were to the church. The influence of this fanaticism was strong and alarming, similar to the frenzy that had drawn all the people of Europe to the deserts of Syria and Palestine around 250 years earlier. The phenomenon itself wasn't new. As far back as the 11th century, many believers in Asia and Southern Europe inflicted self-punishment through flagellation. Dominicus Loricatus, a monk from St. Croce d’Avellano, was noted as a key figure and exemplar of this form of self-discipline, which, according to early Asiatic Anchorites, was considered highly Christian. The author of the formal processions of the Flagellants is said to have been St. Anthony; during his time (1231), this type of penance was so widespread that it was recorded as a significant event in history. In 1260, the Flagellants emerged in Italy as Devoti. 36“When the land was tainted by vices and crimes[119], an unprecedented wave of remorse suddenly overtook the minds of the Italians. A fear of Christ gripped everyone: nobles and commoners, young and old, and even five-year-old children paraded through the streets wearing nothing but a scarf around their waist. Each carried a whip made of leather strips, which they used on their bodies, amid sighs and tears, with such force that blood flowed from their wounds. They marched not only during the day but even at night, and in the harshest winters, filling the cities with burning torches and banners, in the thousands and tens of thousands, led by their priests, and they prostrated themselves before the altars. They followed the same pattern in the villages; the woods and mountains echoed with the voices of those crying out to God. Only the sorrowful chants of the penitent could be heard. Enemies reconciled; men and women competed in acts of charity, as if they feared that Divine Omnipotence would decree their destruction.”

The pilgrimages of the Flagellants extended throughout all the provinces of Southern Germany, as far as Saxony, Bohemia and Poland, and even further; but at length, the priests resisted this dangerous fanaticism, without being able to extirpate the illusion, which was advantageous to the hierarchy, as long as it submitted to its sway. Regnier, a hermit of Perugia, is recorded as a fanatic preacher of penitence, with whom the extravagance originated[120]. In the year 1296, there was a great procession of the Flagellants in Strasburg[121]; and in 1334, fourteen years before the great mortality, the sermon of Venturinus, a Dominican friar, of Bergamo, induced above 10,000 persons to undertake a new pilgrimage. They scourged themselves in the churches, and were entertained in the market-places, at the public expense. At Rome, Venturinus was derided, and banished by the Pope to the mountains of Ricondona. He patiently endured all—went to the Holy Land, and died at Smyrna, 1346[122]. Hence we see that this fanaticism was a 37mania of the middle ages, which, in the year 1349, on so fearful an occasion, and while still so fresh in remembrance, needed no new founder; of whom, indeed, all the records are silent. It probably arose in many places at the same time; for the terror of death, which pervaded all nations and suddenly set such powerful impulses in motion, might easily conjure up the fanaticism of exaggerated and overpowering repentance.

The pilgrimages of the Flagellants spread across all the provinces of Southern Germany, reaching as far as Saxony, Bohemia, and Poland, and even beyond. However, over time, the priests pushed back against this dangerous fanaticism, although they couldn't completely eliminate the delusion, which benefited the hierarchy as long as it remained under its control. Regnier, a hermit from Perugia, is noted as a zealous preacher of penance, from whom this extravagance started[120]. In 1296, there was a major procession of the Flagellants in Strasburg[121]; and in 1334, fourteen years before the great mortality, a sermon by Venturinus, a Dominican friar from Bergamo, inspired over 10,000 people to undertake a new pilgrimage. They whipped themselves in churches and were supported in public squares, at the expense of the community. In Rome, Venturinus was mocked and exiled by the Pope to the mountains of Ricondona. He endured it all patiently—went to the Holy Land, and died in Smyrna in 1346[122]. Therefore, we see that this fanaticism was a 37mania of the Middle Ages, which, in 1349, during such a terrifying time, and while still fresh in people's memories, didn't need a new founder; in fact, all records are silent on this point. It likely emerged in multiple places simultaneously, as the widespread fear of death that gripped all nations sparked such powerful impulses, easily giving rise to the fanaticism of extreme and overwhelming repentance.

The manner and proceedings of the Flagellants of the 13th and 14th centuries, exactly resemble each other. But, if during the Black Plague, simple credulity came to their aid, which seized, as a consolation, the grossest delusion of religious enthusiasm, yet it is evident that the leaders must have been intimately united, and have exercised the power of a secret association. Besides, the rude band was generally under the control of men of learning, some of whom at least, certainly had other objects in view, independent of those which ostensibly appeared. Whoever was desirous of joining the brotherhood, was bound to remain in it thirty-four days, and to have four pence per day at his own disposal, so that he might not be burthensome to any one; if married, he was obliged to have the sanction of his wife, and give the assurance that he was reconciled to all men. The Brothers of the Cross, were not permitted to seek for free quarters, or even to enter a house without having been invited; they were forbidden to converse with females; and if they transgressed these rules, or acted without discretion, they were obliged to confess to the Superior, who sentenced them to several lashes of the scourge, by way of penance. Ecclesiastics had not, as such, any pre-eminence among them; according to their original law, which, however, was often transgressed, they could not become Masters, or take part in the Secret Councils. Penance was performed twice every day: in the morning and evening, they went abroad in pairs, singing psalms, amid the ringing of the bells; and when they arrived at the place of flagellation, they stripped the upper part of their bodies and put off their shoes, keeping on only a linen dress, reaching from the waist to the ancles. They then lay down in a large circle, in 38different positions, according to the nature of their crime: the adulterer with his face to the ground; the perjurer on one side, holding up three of his fingers, &c., and were then castigated, some more and some less, by the Master, who ordered them to rise in the words of a prescribed form[123]. Upon this, they scourged themselves, amid the singing of psalms and loud supplications for the averting of the plague, with genuflexions, and other ceremonies, of which contemporary writers give various accounts; and at the same time constantly boasted of their penance, that the blood of their wounds was mingled with that of the Saviour[124]. One of them, in conclusion, stood up to read a letter, which it was pretended an angel had brought from heaven, to St. Peter’s church, at Jerusalem, stating that Christ, who was sore displeased at the sins of man, had granted, at the intercession of the Holy Virgin and of the angels, that all who should wander about for thirty-four days and scourge themselves, should be partakers of the Divine grace[125]. This scene caused as great a commotion among the believers as the finding of the holy spear once did at Antioch; and if any among the clergy inquired who had sealed the letter? he was boldly answered, the same who had sealed the Gospel!

The actions and rituals of the Flagellants in the 13th and 14th centuries were very similar. During the Black Plague, their simple gullibility was boosted by a misguided sense of religious fervor that offered false comfort. It's clear that the leaders were closely connected and must have operated like a secret society. Additionally, this rough group was usually guided by educated individuals, some of whom likely had their own agendas beyond what was publicly stated. Anyone wanting to join the brotherhood had to commit to thirty-four days and have four pence a day to spend, to avoid being a burden to anyone. If married, they needed their wife’s approval and had to ensure they were reconciled with everyone. The Brothers of the Cross couldn’t seek free lodging or enter a home unless invited; they weren’t allowed to talk to women; and if they broke these rules or acted irresponsibly, they had to confess to the Superior, who would impose a punishment of several lashes as penance. Clergy did not have any special status among them; according to their original rules, which were often ignored, they couldn’t become Masters or participate in the Secret Councils. Penance was performed twice daily: in the morning and the evening, when they would go out in pairs singing psalms as the bells rang. At the site chosen for flagellation, they would strip their upper bodies, remove their shoes, and wear only a linen garment that reached from their waists to their ankles. They then lay down in a large circle, in 38 different positions based on their sins: the adulterer facedown; the perjurer lay on one side, holding up three fingers, etc. They were then whipped, to varying degrees, by the Master, who would instruct them to rise with a prescribed phrase[123]. After this, they would whip themselves while singing psalms and making loud pleas for the plague to be averted, incorporating genuflections and other rituals that contemporary writers describe in various ways; all the while, they boasted that their blood from the wounds mixed with that of the Savior[124]. Lastly, one of them would stand up to read a letter, supposedly delivered from heaven by an angel to St. Peter’s church in Jerusalem, claiming that Christ, who was very displeased with humanity’s sins, had granted, at the request of the Holy Virgin and the angels, that anyone wandering for thirty-four days while whipping themselves would receive Divine grace[125]. This event created as much excitement among the followers as the discovery of the holy spear did in Antioch; and if any clergy member asked who sealed the letter, they boldly replied that it was the same person who sealed the Gospel!

All this had so powerful an effect, that the church was in considerable danger; for the Flagellants gained more credit than the priests, from whom they so entirely withdrew themselves, that they even absolved each other. Besides, they everywhere took possession of the churches, and their new songs, which went from mouth to mouth, operated strongly on the minds of the people. Great enthusiasm and originally pious feelings, are clearly distinguishable in these hymns, and especially in the chief psalm of the Cross-bearers, which is still extant, and which was sung all over Germany, in different dialects, and is probably of a more ancient date[126]. Degeneracy, however, 39soon crept in; crimes were everywhere committed; and there was no energetic man capable of directing the individual excitement to purer objects, even had an effectual resistance to the tottering church been at that early period seasonable, and had it been possible to restrain the fanaticism. The Flagellants sometimes undertook to make trial of their power of working miracles; as in Strasburg, where they attempted, in their own circle, to resuscitate a dead child: they however failed, and their unskilfulness did them much harm, though they succeeded here and there in maintaining some confidence in their holy calling, by pretending to have the power of casting out evil spirits[127].

All this had such a powerful effect that the church was in serious danger; the Flagellants gained more credibility than the priests, from whom they completely separated themselves, to the point that they even granted absolution to one another. Moreover, they took over churches everywhere, and their new songs, which spread from person to person, had a strong impact on the minds of the people. Great enthusiasm and originally pious feelings are clearly evident in these hymns, especially in the main psalm of the Cross-bearers, which still exists and was sung all over Germany in different dialects, likely of a more ancient origin[126]. However, degeneracy soon set in; crimes were committed everywhere, and there was no strong leader to guide the individual excitement towards purer aims, even if an effective resistance to the crumbling church had been timely and it had been possible to curb the fanaticism. The Flagellants sometimes tried to demonstrate their ability to perform miracles; in Strasbourg, for instance, they attempted, among themselves, to bring a dead child back to life: they failed, and their lack of skill caused them significant harm, though they occasionally managed to maintain some faith in their holy mission by pretending to have the ability to cast out evil spirits[127].

The Brotherhood of the Cross announced that the pilgrimage of the Flagellants was to continue for a space of thirty-four years; and many of the Masters had, doubtless, determined to form a lasting league against the church; but they had gone too far. So early as the first year of their establishment, the general indignation set bounds to their intrigues; so that the strict measures adopted by the Emperor Charles IV., and Pope Clement[128], who, throughout the whole of this fearful period, manifested prudence and noble-mindedness, and conducted himself in a manner every way worthy of his high station, were easily put into execution[129].

The Brotherhood of the Cross announced that the pilgrimage of the Flagellants would go on for thirty-four years, and many of the Masters probably intended to create a lasting alliance against the church. However, they had gone too far. As early as the first year of their formation, widespread outrage limited their schemes, so that the strict actions taken by Emperor Charles IV and Pope Clement[128], who showed wisdom and generosity throughout this troubling time and acted in a way befitting his high position, were easily implemented[129].

The Sorbonne, at Paris, and the Emperor Charles, had already applied to the Holy See, for assistance against these formidable and heretical excesses, which had well nigh destroyed the influence of the clergy in every place; when a hundred of the Brotherhood of the Cross arrived at Avignon from Basle, and desired admission. The Pope, regardless of the intercession of several cardinals, interdicted their public penance, which he had not authorized; and, on pain of excommunication, prohibited 40throughout Christendom the continuance of these pilgrimages[130]. Philip VI., supported by the condemnatory judgment of the Sorbonne, forbad their reception in France[131]. Manfred, King of Sicily, at the same time threatened them with punishment by death: and in the East, they were withstood by several bishops, among whom was Janussius, of Gnesen[132], and Preczlaw, of Breslaw, who condemned to death one of their Masters, formerly a deacon; and, in conformity with the barbarity of the times, had him publicly burnt[133]. In Westphalia, where so shortly before they had venerated the Brothers of the Cross, they now persecuted them with relentless severity[134]; and in the Mark, as well as in all the other countries of Germany, they pursued them, as if they had been the authors of every misfortune[135].

The Sorbonne in Paris and Emperor Charles had already reached out to the Holy See for help against these powerful and heretical excesses that were nearly ruining the clergy's influence everywhere. At that time, a hundred members of the Brotherhood of the Cross arrived in Avignon from Basle and asked to be let in. The Pope, ignoring the pleas from several cardinals, banned their public penance, which he hadn't approved; and, under threat of excommunication, he prohibited 40 the continuation of these pilgrimages throughout Christendom[130]. Philip VI, backed by the Sorbonne's ruling, forbade their entry into France[131]. Manfred, King of Sicily, simultaneously threatened them with the death penalty. In the East, several bishops opposed them, including Janussius of Gnesen[132] and Preczlaw of Breslaw, who condemned one of their Masters, a former deacon, to death and, in line with the brutality of the times, had him publicly burned[133]. In Westphalia, where they had recently been honored, the Brothers of the Cross were now relentlessly persecuted[134], and in the Mark, as well as in all other German territories, they were hunted down as if they were responsible for every misfortune[135].

The processions of the Brotherhood of the Cross undoubtedly promoted the spreading of the plague; and it is evident, that the gloomy fanaticism which gave rise to them, would infuse a new poison into the already desponding minds of the people.

The processions of the Brotherhood of the Cross definitely contributed to the spread of the plague; and it’s clear that the dark fanaticism that sparked them would only add more negativity to the already troubled minds of the people.

Still, however, all this was within the bounds of barbarous enthusiasm; but horrible were the persecutions of the Jews, which were committed in most countries, with even greater exasperation than in the 12th century, during the first Crusades. In every destructive pestilence, the common people at first attribute the mortality to poison. No instruction avails; the supposed testimony of their eyesight, is to them a proof, and they authoritatively demand the victims of their rage. On whom then was it so likely to fall, as on the Jews, the usurers and the strangers who lived at enmity with the Christians? They were everywhere suspected of having poisoned the wells or infected the air[136]. They alone were considered as having brought this fearful mortality upon the Christians[137]. They were, in consequence, 41pursued with merciless cruelty; and either indiscriminately given up to the fury of the populace, or sentenced by sanguinary tribunals, which, with all the forms of law, ordered them to be burnt alive. In times like these, much is indeed said of guilt and innocence; but hatred and revenge bear down all discrimination, and the smallest probability, magnifies suspicion into certainty. These bloody scenes, which disgraced Europe in the 14th century, are a counterpart to a similar mania of the age, which was manifested in the persecutions of witches and sorcerers; and, like these they prove, that enthusiasm, associated with hatred, and leagued with the baser passions, may work more powerfully upon whole nations, than religion and legal order; nay, that it even knows how to profit by the authority of both, in order the more surely to satiate with blood, the sword of long suppressed revenge.

Still, all of this was within the limits of a brutal enthusiasm; but the persecution of the Jews was horrific, happening in many countries with even greater anger than in the 12th century during the first Crusades. In every devastating plague, the common people initially blame the deaths on poison. No amount of reasoning helps; their supposed eyewitness accounts are proof to them, and they demand the victims of their rage. So, who was more likely to be targeted than the Jews, the moneylenders and outsiders who lived in conflict with Christians? They were suspected everywhere of having poisoned the wells or contaminated the air[136]. They alone were seen as the cause of this terrible mortality among Christians[137]. As a result, they were pursued with merciless cruelty; either they were handed over to the rage of the mob or sentenced by bloodthirsty courts that, with all the legal formalities, ordered them to be burned alive. In times like these, much is said about guilt and innocence; however, hatred and revenge override all distinctions, and the slightest possibility turns suspicion into certainty. These bloody events that shamed Europe in the 14th century mirror a similar frenzy of the time, seen in the witch hunts; both show that passion, combined with hatred and fueled by base emotions, can sway entire nations more powerfully than religion and the rule of law; indeed, it can even exploit the authority of both to satisfy a long-suppressed thirst for blood.

The persecution of the Jews commenced in September and October, 1348[138], at Chillon, on the Lake of Geneva, where the first criminal proceedings were instituted against them, after they had long before been accused by the people of poisoning the wells; similar scenes followed in Bern and Freyburg, in January, 1349. Under the influence of excruciating suffering, the tortured Jews confessed themselves guilty of the crime imputed to them; and it being affirmed that poison had in fact been found in a well at Zoffingen, this was deemed a sufficient proof to convince the world; and the persecution of the abhorred culprits, thus appeared justifiable. Now, though we can take as little exception at these proceedings, as at the multifarious confessions of witches, because the interrogatories of the fanatical and sanguinary tribunals, were so complicated, that by means of the rack, the required answer must inevitably be obtained; and it is besides conformable to human nature, that crimes which are in every body’s mouth, may, in the end, be actually committed by some, either from wantonness, revenge, or desperate exasperation: yet crimes and accusations are, under circumstances like these, merely the offspring of a revengeful, frenzied spirit in the people; and the accusers, according to the fundamental principles of morality, which are the same in every age, are the more guilty transgressors.

The persecution of the Jews began in September and October, 1348, at Chillon on Lake Geneva, where the first legal actions were taken against them after they had long been accused by the locals of poisoning the wells. Similar events occurred in Bern and Freyburg in January 1349. Under immense suffering, the tortured Jews confessed to the crimes attributed to them; and since it was claimed that poison was actually found in a well at Zoffingen, this was considered enough evidence to convince everyone, making the persecution of those despised individuals seem justified. While we can find as little fault with these actions as we can with the numerous confessions of witches, because the questioning by the fanatic and brutal courts was so convoluted that the desired answer was inevitably extracted through torture, it is also true that human nature allows for the possibility that crimes that everyone talks about might, in the end, be committed by some, either out of malice, revenge, or sheer frustration. However, in such circumstances, the crimes and accusations are merely the product of a vengeful, frenzied spirit in the populace; and according to the fundamental principles of morality—which are consistent in every age—the accusers are the ones who are more guilty.

42

42

Already in the autumn of 1348, a dreadful panic, caused by this supposed empoisonment, seized all nations; in Germany especially, the springs and wells were built over, that nobody might drink of them, or employ their contents for culinary purposes: and for a long time, the inhabitants of numerous towns and villages, used only river and rain water[139]. The city gates were also guarded with the greatest caution: only confidential persons were admitted; and if medicine, or any other article, which might be supposed to be poisonous, was found in the possession of a stranger,—and it was natural that some should have these things by them for their private use,—they were forced to swallow a portion of it[140]. By this trying state of privation, distrust and suspicion, the hatred against the supposed poisoners became greatly increased, and often broke out in popular commotions, which only served still further to infuriate the wildest passions. The noble and the mean, fearlessly bound themselves by an oath, to extirpate the Jews by fire and sword, and to snatch them from their protectors, of whom the number was so small, that throughout all Germany, but few places can be mentioned where these unfortunate people were not regarded as outlaws and martyred and burnt[141]. Solemn summonses were issued from Bern to the towns of Basle, Freyburg in the Breisgau, and Strasburg, to pursue the Jews as poisoners. The Burgomasters and Senators, indeed, opposed this requisition; but in Basle the populace obliged them to bind themselves by an oath, to burn the Jews, and to forbid persons of that community from entering their city, for the space of two hundred years. Upon this, all the Jews in Basle, whose number could not have been inconsiderable, were inclosed in a wooden building, constructed for the purpose, and burnt together with it, upon the mere outcry of the people, without sentence or trial, which indeed would have availed them nothing. Soon after, the same thing took place at Freyburg. A regular Diet was held at Bennefeld, in Alsace, where the bishops, lords and barons, as also deputies of the counties and towns, consulted how they should proceed with regard to the Jews; and when the deputies of Strasburg 43—not indeed the bishop of this town, who proved himself a violent fanatic—spoke in favour of the persecuted, as nothing criminal was substantiated against them; a great outcry was raised, and it was vehemently asked, why, if so, they had covered their wells and removed their buckets? A sanguinary decree was resolved upon, of which the populace, who obeyed the call of the nobles and superior clergy, became but the too willing executioners[142]. Wherever the Jews were not burnt, they were at least banished; and so being compelled to wander about, they fell into the hands of the country people, who without humanity, and regardless of all laws, persecuted them with fire and sword. At Spires, the Jews, driven to despair, assembled in their own habitations, which they set on fire, and thus consumed themselves with their families. The few that remained were forced to submit to baptism; while the dead bodies of the murdered, which lay about the streets, were put into empty wine casks, and rolled into the Rhine, lest they should infect the air. The mob was forbidden to enter the ruins of the habitations that were burnt in the Jewish quarter; for the senate itself caused search to be made for the treasure, which is said to have been very considerable. At Strasburg, two thousand Jews were burnt alive in their own burial ground, where a large scaffold had been erected: a few who promised to embrace Christianity, were spared, and their children taken from the pile. The youth and beauty of several females also excited some commiseration; and they were snatched from death against their will: many, however, who forcibly made their escape from the flames, were murdered in the streets.

Already in the autumn of 1348, a terrible panic, caused by this supposed poisoning, seized all nations; in Germany especially, the springs and wells were covered up so that no one could drink from them or use their water for cooking: for a long time, the residents of many towns and villages relied only on river and rainwater[139]. The city gates were also guarded very carefully: only trusted individuals were allowed in; and if a stranger was found with medicine or any other item that might be considered poisonous—which was natural since some would have those things for personal use—they were forced to ingest a portion of it[140]. This difficult situation of deprivation, distrust, and suspicion greatly heightened the hatred against the supposed poisoners, often erupting into public riots that only fueled even greater anger. Both nobles and commoners rashly vowed to eliminate the Jews by fire and sword and to take them from their protectors, whose numbers were so few that across all of Germany, only a handful of places can be mentioned where these unfortunate people were not considered outlaws, martyred, and burned[141]. Official summonses were sent from Bern to the towns of Basle, Freyburg in the Breisgau, and Strasburg, urging them to hunt down the Jews as poisoners. The Burgomasters and Senators opposed this demand; however, in Basle, the populace forced them to swear an oath to burn the Jews and to prohibit members of that community from entering their city for two hundred years. As a result, all the Jews in Basle, whose numbers couldn't have been small, were confined in a wooden building created for that purpose and burned along with it, simply on the outcry of the people, without any judgment or trial, which would have done them no good anyway. Soon after, the same thing occurred in Freyburg. A formal assembly was held at Bennefeld in Alsace, where bishops, lords, and barons, as well as deputies from counties and towns, discussed how to deal with the Jews; when the deputies of Strasburg 43—not including the town's bishop, who was a fierce fanatic—spoke up for the persecuted, pointing out that nothing criminal had been proven against them, a loud outcry erupted, with questions raised about why, if that was the case, they had covered their wells and removed their buckets. A bloody decree was decided upon, and the populace, who followed the nobles and higher clergy, became willing executioners[142]. Wherever the Jews were not burned, they were at least expelled; and thus forced to wander, they fell prey to local country people, who ruthlessly and without regard for any laws, persecuted them with fire and sword. In Spires, the Jews, driven to despair, gathered in their homes, which they set ablaze, consuming themselves along with their families. The few who survived were compelled to convert to Christianity; while the corpses of the murdered, laying in the streets, were placed into empty wine barrels and rolled into the Rhine to prevent them from contaminating the air. The mob was forbidden from entering the ruins of the houses that were burned in the Jewish quarter; for the senate itself sought to find the treasure that was said to be quite substantial. In Strasburg, two thousand Jews were burned alive in their own burial ground, where a large scaffold had been built: a few who agreed to convert to Christianity were spared, and their children were taken from the fire. The youth and beauty of several women also drew some sympathy; and they were pulled from certain death against their will: many, however, who forcibly escaped the flames were killed in the streets.

The senate ordered all pledges and bonds to be returned to the debtors, and divided the money among the work-people[143]. Many, however, refused to accept the base price of blood, and, indignant at the scenes of blood-thirsty avarice, which made the infuriated multitude forget[144] that the plague was raging around them, presented it to monasteries, in conformity with the advice 44of their confessors. In all the countries on the Rhine, these cruelties continued to be perpetrated during the succeeding months; and after quiet was in some degree restored, the people thought to render an acceptable service to God, by taking the bricks of the destroyed dwellings, and the tombstones of the Jews, to repair churches and to erect belfries[145].

The senate ordered that all loans and bonds be returned to the debtors and divided the money among the workers[143]. However, many refused to accept the shameful compensation for blood, and outraged by the scenes of greedy violence that made the furious crowd forget[144] that the plague was ravaging around them, donated it to monasteries, following the advice 44 of their confessors. In all the areas along the Rhine, these atrocities continued for the following months; and after some calm was restored, the people thought it would please God by using the bricks from the destroyed homes and the gravestones of the Jews to repair churches and build bell towers[145].

In Mayence alone, 12,000 Jews are said to have been put to a cruel death. The Flagellants entered that place in August; the Jews, on this occasion, fell out with the Christians, and killed several; but when they saw their inability to withstand the increasing superiority of their enemies, and that nothing could save them from destruction, they consumed themselves and their families, by setting fire to their dwellings. Thus also, in other places, the entry of the Flagellants gave rise to scenes of slaughter; and as thirst for blood was everywhere combined with an unbridled spirit of proselytism, a fanatic zeal arose among the Jews, to perish as martyrs to their ancient religion. And how was it possible, that they could from the heart embrace Christianity, when its precepts were never more outrageously violated? At Eslingen, the whole Jewish community burned themselves in their synagogue[146]; and mothers were often seen throwing their children on the pile, to prevent their being baptized, and then precipitating themselves into the flames[147]. In short, whatever deeds, fanaticism, revenge, avarice and desperation, in fearful combination, could instigate mankind to perform,—and where in such a case is the limit?—were executed in the year 1349, throughout Germany, Italy and France, with impunity, and in the eyes of all the world. It seemed as if the plague gave rise to scandalous acts and frantic tumults, not to mourning and grief: and the greater part of those who, by their education and rank, were called upon to raise the voice of reason, themselves led on the savage mob to murder and to plunder. Almost all the Jews who saved their lives by baptism, were afterwards burnt at different times; for they continued to be accused of poisoning the water and the air. Christians also, whom philanthropy or gain had induced to offer them protection, were put on the rack and executed with them[148]. Many Jews who had embraced Christianity, repented of their apostacy,—and, 45returning to their former faith, sealed it with their death[149].

In Mainz alone, 12,000 Jews are reported to have been brutally killed. The Flagellants arrived there in August; during this time, the Jews quarreled with the Christians and killed several people. However, when they realized they couldn't hold their ground against their enemies' growing power and that nothing could save them from doom, they took their own lives along with their families by setting fire to their homes. Similarly, in other places, the arrival of the Flagellants led to horrific massacres. Fueled by a thirst for blood combined with an uncontrollable desire to convert others, a fanatical zeal emerged among the Jews, pushing them to die as martyrs for their ancient faith. And how could they wholeheartedly embrace Christianity when its teachings were being so viciously violated? In Esslingen, the entire Jewish community burned themselves in their synagogue[146]; mothers were frequently seen throwing their children onto the pyre to prevent them from being baptized and then jumping into the flames themselves[147]. In short, whatever acts of fanaticism, revenge, greed, and desperation, in horrific combination, could drive people to commit—what limits could there be?—were carried out in 1349 across Germany, Italy, and France, with total impunity, and in front of the entire world. It seemed that the plague inspired scandalous acts and chaotic riots instead of mourning and sorrow: most of those who were expected to speak out with reason ended up leading the savage mob to murder and looting. Almost all the Jews who managed to save themselves by converting to Christianity were later burned at various times because they were still accused of poisoning water and air. Christians who had offered them protection out of kindness or greed were also tortured and executed alongside them[148]. Many Jews who had converted to Christianity regretted their decision— and, 45 returning to their former faith, sealed it with their deaths[149].

The humanity and prudence of Clement VI., must, on this occasion, also be mentioned to his honour; but even the highest ecclesiastical power was insufficient to restrain the unbridled fury of the people. He not only protected the Jews at Avignon, as far as lay in his power, but also issued two bulls, in which he declared them innocent; and admonished all Christians, though without success, to cease from such groundless persecutions[150]. The Emperor Charles IV. was also favourable to them, and sought to avert their destruction, wherever he could; but he dared not draw the sword of justice, and even found himself obliged to yield to the selfishness of the Bohemian nobles, who were unwilling to forego so favourable an opportunity of releasing themselves from their Jewish creditors, under favour of an imperial mandate[151]. Duke Albert of Austria burned and pillaged those of his cities, which had persecuted the Jews,—a vain and inhuman proceeding, which, moreover, is not exempt from the suspicion of covetousness; yet he was unable, in his own fortress of Kyberg, to protect some hundreds of Jews, who had been received there, from being barbarously burnt by the inhabitants[152]. Several other princes and counts, among whom was Ruprecht von der Pfalz, took the Jews under their protection on the payment of large sums: in consequence of which they were called “Jew-masters,” and were in danger of being attacked by the populace and by their powerful neighbours[153]. These persecuted and ill-used people, except indeed where humane individuals took compassion on them at their own peril, or when they could command riches to purchase protection, 46had no place of refuge left but the distant country of Lithuania, where Boleslav V., Duke of Poland (1227–1279), had before granted them liberty of conscience; and King Casimir the Great (1333–1370), yielding to the entreaties of Esther, a favourite Jewess, received them, and granted them further protection[154]: on which account, that country is still inhabited by a great number of Jews, who by their secluded habits, have, more than any people in Europe, retained the manners of the middle ages.

The compassion and wisdom of Clement VI must also be acknowledged here; however, even the highest church authority was not enough to control the unchecked anger of the people. He not only defended the Jews in Avignon as much as he could but also issued two papal bulls declaring them innocent and urged all Christians—though without success—to stop such unfounded persecutions[150]. Emperor Charles IV was also supportive and tried to prevent their destruction whenever possible, but he didn't have the courage to take action and had to give in to the greed of the Bohemian nobles, who were eager to use this opportunity to free themselves from their Jewish creditors under the guise of an imperial order[151]. Duke Albert of Austria destroyed and looted the cities that had persecuted the Jews—a futile and cruel act, which also raises suspicions of greed; yet he was unable to protect the hundreds of Jews who had sought refuge in his fortress at Kyberg from being brutally burned by the locals[152]. Several other princes and counts, including Ruprecht von der Pfalz, took the Jews under their protection in exchange for large sums of money: as a result, they were referred to as “Jew-masters” and faced the risk of attacks from the populace and their powerful neighbors[153]. These persecuted and mistreated individuals, except where kind-hearted people helped them at great personal risk or when they had enough wealth to buy protection, 46had no sanctuary left but the distant land of Lithuania, where Boleslav V., Duke of Poland (1227–1279), had previously granted them freedom of belief; and King Casimir the Great (1333–1370), responding to the pleas of a beloved Jewess named Esther, welcomed them and provided them with additional protection[154]: because of this, that region is still home to a large number of Jews, who, due to their isolated lifestyles, have retained the customs of the Middle Ages more than any other group in Europe.

But to return to the fearful accusations against the Jews; it was reported in all Europe, that they were in connexion with secret superiors in Toledo, to whose decrees they were subject, and from whom they had received commands respecting the coining of base money, poisoning, the murder of Christian children, &c.[155]; that they received the poison by sea from remote parts, and also prepared it themselves from spiders, owls and other venomous animals; but, in order that their secret might not be discovered, that it was known only to the Rabbis and rich men[156]. Apparently there were but few who did not consider this extravagant accusation well founded; indeed, in many writings of the 14th century, we find great acrimony with regard to the suspected poison mixers, which plainly demonstrates the prejudice existing against them. Unhappily, after the confessions of the first victims in Switzerland, the rack extorted similar ones in various places. Some even acknowledged having received poisonous powder in bags, and injunctions from Toledo, by secret messengers. Bags of this description were also often found in wells, though it was not unfrequently discovered that the Christians themselves had thrown them in; probably to give occasion to murder and pillage; similar instances of which may be found in the persecutions of the witches[157].

But to return to the alarming accusations against the Jews; it was reported throughout Europe that they were connected with secret leaders in Toledo, to whose orders they were subject, and from whom they had received commands regarding the production of counterfeit money, poisoning, the murder of Christian children, etc.[155]; that they received poison by sea from distant locations and also prepared it themselves from spiders, owls, and other poisonous creatures; however, to keep their secret hidden, it was known only to the Rabbis and wealthy individuals[156]. Apparently, very few people doubted that this outrageous accusation was justified; indeed, in many writings from the 14th century, we see a strong animosity towards the suspected poisoners, which clearly shows the prejudice against them. Unfortunately, after the confessions of the first victims in Switzerland, similar confessions were extracted under torture in various places. Some even admitted to receiving poisonous powder in bags and orders from Toledo via secret messengers. Bags like these were often found in wells, although it was frequently discovered that Christians themselves had thrown them in, likely to create opportunities for murder and looting; similar occurrences can be found in the witch hunts[157].

47

47

This picture needs no additions. A lively image of the Black Plague, and of the moral evil which followed in its train, will vividly represent itself to him who is acquainted with nature and the constitution of society. Almost the only credible accounts of the manner of living, and of the ruin which occurred in private life, during this pestilence, are from Italy; and these may enable us to form a just estimate of the general state of families in Europe, taking into consideration what is peculiar in the manners of each country.

This picture doesn’t need any extras. A vivid image of the Black Plague and the moral decay that came afterward will clearly come to mind for anyone familiar with nature and society's structure. Almost the only reliable accounts of how people lived and the destruction that happened in personal lives during this epidemic come from Italy, and these can help us understand the overall condition of families in Europe, keeping in mind the unique customs of each country.

“When the evil had become universal,” (speaking of Florence,) “the hearts of all the inhabitants were closed to feelings of humanity. They fled from the sick and all that belonged to them, hoping by these means to save themselves. Others shut themselves up in their houses, with their wives, their children and households, living on the most costly food, but carefully avoiding all excess. None were allowed access to them; no intelligence of death or sickness was permitted to reach their ears; and they spent their time in singing and music, and other pastimes. Others, on the contrary, considered eating and drinking to excess, amusements of all descriptions, the indulgence of every gratification, and an indifference to what was passing around them, as the best medicine, and acted accordingly. They wandered day and night, from one tavern to another, and feasted without moderation or bounds. In this way they endeavoured to avoid all contact with the sick, and abandoned their houses and property to chance, like men whose death-knell had already tolled.

“When the evil became widespread,” (referring to Florence,) “the hearts of all the residents were closed off to feelings of humanity. They avoided the sick and anything related to them, hoping to save themselves. Others locked themselves in their homes with their wives, children, and households, living only on the most expensive food while avoiding any excess. No one was allowed to visit them; they didn’t want to hear any news of death or illness; instead, they spent their time singing, making music, and engaging in other pastimes. On the other hand, some believed that overeating, drinking excessively, indulging in all kinds of entertainment, and ignoring what was happening around them were the best ways to cope, and they acted accordingly. They roamed day and night from one bar to another, feasting without limits. This way, they tried to avoid any contact with the sick, leaving their homes and possessions to fate, like people who already knew their own end was near.”

“Amid this general lamentation and woe, the influence and authority of every law, human and divine, vanished. Most of those who were in office, had been carried off by the plague, or lay sick, or had lost so many members of their families, that they were unable to attend to their duties; so that thenceforth every one acted as he thought proper. Others, in their mode of living, chose a middle course. They ate and drank what they 48pleased, and walked abroad, carrying odoriferous flowers, herbs or spices, which they smelt to from time to time, in order to invigorate the brain, and to avert the baneful influence of the air, infected by the sick, and by the innumerable corpses of those who had died of the plague. Others carried their precaution still further, and thought the surest way to escape death was by flight. They therefore left the city; women as well as men abandoning their dwellings and their relations, and retiring into the country. But of these also, many were carried off, most of them alone and deserted by all the world, themselves having previously set the example. Thus it was, that one citizen fled from another—a neighbour from his neighbours—a relation from his relations; and in the end, so completely had terror extinguished every kindlier feeling, that the brother forsook the brother—the sister the sister—the wife her husband; and at last, even the parent his own offspring, and abandoned them, unvisited and unsoothed, to their fate. Those, therefore, that stood in need of assistance fell a prey to greedy attendants; who for an exorbitant recompense, merely handed the sick their food and medicine, remained with them in their last moments, and then not unfrequently, became themselves victims to their avarice and lived not to enjoy their extorted gain. Propriety and decorum were extinguished among the helpless sick. Females of rank seemed to forget their natural bashfulness, and committed the care of their persons, indiscriminately, to men and women of the lowest order. No longer were women, relatives or friends, found in the house of mourning, to share the grief of the survivors—no longer was the corpse accompanied to the grave by neighbours and a numerous train of priests, carrying wax tapers and singing psalms, nor was it borne along by other citizens of equal rank. Many breathed their last without a friend to sooth their dying pillow; and few indeed were they who departed amid the lamentations and tears of their friends and kindred. Instead of sorrow and mourning, appeared indifference, frivolity and mirth; this being considered, especially by the females, as conducive to health. Seldom was the body followed by even ten or twelve attendants; and instead of the usual bearers and sextons, mercenaries of the lowest of the populace undertook the office for the sake of gain; and accompanied by only a few priests, and often without a single taper, it was borne to the very nearest church, and lowered into the first49 grave that was not already too full to receive it. Among the middling classes, and especially among the poor, the misery was still greater. Poverty or negligence induced most of these to remain in their dwellings, or in the immediate neighbourhood; and thus they fell by thousands: and many ended their lives in the streets, by day and by night. The stench of putrefying corpses was often the first indication to their neighbours that more deaths had occurred. The survivors, to preserve themselves from infection, generally had the bodies taken out of the houses, and laid before the doors; where the early morn found them in heaps, exposed to the affrighted gaze of the passing stranger. It was no longer possible to have a bier for every corpse,—three or four were generally laid together—husband and wife, father and mother, with two or three children, were frequently borne to the grave on the same bier; and it often happened that two priests would accompany a coffin, bearing the cross before it, and be joined on the way by several other funerals; so that instead of one, there were five or six bodies for interment.”

“Amid this widespread grief and suffering, the impact and control of every law, both human and divine, disappeared. Most of those in positions of authority had either died from the plague, were sick, or had lost so many family members that they couldn't focus on their responsibilities; so from then on, everyone acted as they saw fit. Some adopted a moderate lifestyle. They ate and drank whatever they wanted, strolling around with fragrant flowers, herbs, or spices that they periodically smelled to boost their spirits and ward off the harmful effects of the contaminated air, tainted by the sick and the countless bodies of those who perished from the plague. Others took more drastic measures, believing the best way to avoid death was to escape. They fled the city, with both men and women leaving their homes and loved ones to seek refuge in the countryside. However, many of them also succumbed, often alone and abandoned by everyone, having set the precedent themselves. This is how it happened: one citizen ran from another—a neighbor from their neighbors—a relative from their relatives; and ultimately, fear had erased every ounce of affection, causing brother to forsake brother, sister to abandon sister, wife to leave husband; and finally, even parents turned their backs on their own children, leaving them lonely and uncared for to face their fate. Those in need of help fell prey to greedy attendants, who for an outrageous fee, merely delivered food and medicine to the sick, stayed with them in their final moments, and frequently became victims of their own greed, never living to enjoy their ill-gotten gains. Manners and modesty vanished among the vulnerable sick. Women of high status seemed to forget their natural shyness, freely entrusting their care to men and women of the lowest class. No longer were women—relatives or friends—present in the mourning household to share in the sorrow of those left behind; no longer was the deceased accompanied to the grave by neighbors and a large procession of priests carrying wax candles and singing hymns, nor was it carried by fellow citizens of similar standing. Many breathed their last without a single friend to comfort them; and very few departed amidst the lamentations and tears of their loved ones. Instead of grief and mourning, there was apathy, frivolity, and even laughter; this was particularly seen as beneficial for health by women. Rarely did a body have even ten or twelve attendees; and instead of regular bearers and sextons, those from the lowest classes took on the job for money; accompanied by only a few priests, and often without a single candle, the body was taken to the nearest church and buried in the first grave that wasn’t already too full to accept it. Among the middle class and especially the poor, the suffering was even greater. Poverty or indifference kept many of them in their homes or the nearby area; and thus, they fell by the thousands, with many meeting their end in the streets, day and night. The stench of decaying bodies was often the first sign for neighbors that more deaths had occurred. To protect themselves from infection, the survivors typically had the bodies removed from their homes and left outside their doors; by morning, they would be found in piles, laid bare to the horrified eyes of passersby. It was no longer feasible to have a coffin for every corpse—three or four were usually laid together—husband and wife, father and mother, sometimes with two or three children, were often buried on the same bier; and it frequently happened that two priests would accompany a coffin, carrying the cross ahead, joined along the way by several other funerals, resulting in five or six bodies being buried together.”

Thus far Boccacio. On the conduct of the priests, another contemporary observes[158]: “In large and small towns, they had withdrawn themselves through fear, leaving the performance of ecclesiastical duties to the few who were found courageous and faithful enough to undertake them.” But we ought not on that account to throw more blame on them than on others; for we find proofs of the same timidity and heartlessness in every class. During the prevalence of the Black Plague, the charitable orders conducted themselves admirably, and did as much good as can be done by individual bodies, in times of great misery and destruction; when compassion, courage, and the nobler feelings, are found but in the few, while cowardice, selfishness and ill-will, with the baser passions in their train, assert the supremacy. In place of virtue, which had been driven from the earth, wickedness everywhere reared her rebellious standard, and succeeding generations were consigned to the dominion of her baleful tyranny.

So far, Boccaccio. Regarding the behavior of the priests, another contemporary notes[158]: “In both big and small towns, they withdrew out of fear, leaving the responsibility of church duties to the few who were brave and loyal enough to take them on.” However, we shouldn’t blame them any more than we do others; we see the same cowardice and indifference across all social classes. During the Black Plague, charitable organizations acted admirably, doing as much good as individuals can in times of great suffering and devastation; when compassion, bravery, and noble qualities are found only in a few, while cowardice, selfishness, and malice, along with their more base instincts, take over. Instead of virtue, which had been pushed out of society, wickedness took its place, raising her defiant banner everywhere, and future generations were left under the control of her harmful tyranny.


CHAPTER VI.

PHYSICIANS.

If we now turn to the medical talent which encountered the “Great Mortality,” the middle ages must stand excused, since even the moderns are of opinion that the art of medicine is not able to cope with the Oriental plague, and can afford deliverance from it only under particularly favourable circumstances[159]. We must bear in mind also, that human science and art appear particularly weak in great pestilences, because they have to contend with the powers of nature, of which they have no knowledge; and which, if they had been, or could be comprehended in their collective effects, would remain uncontrollable by them, principally on account of the disordered condition of human society. Moreover, every new plague has its peculiarities, which are the less easily discovered on first view, because, during its ravages, fear and consternation humble the proud spirit.

If we now look at the medical talent that faced the “Great Mortality,” we should forgive the middle ages, as even today, many believe that medicine struggles to handle the Oriental plague and can only provide relief under particularly favorable conditions[159]. We must also remember that human science and art seem especially powerless during major pandemics because they are up against the forces of nature, which they do not understand; and even if these forces were known or could be understood collectively, they would still remain out of reach, mainly due to the chaos in human society. Additionally, every new plague has its own unique characteristics, which are harder to identify at first glance because, during its outbreaks, fear and panic can diminish even the strongest spirit.

The physicians of the 14th century, during the Black Death, did what human intellect could do in the actual condition of the healing art; and their knowledge of the disease was by no means despicable. They, like the rest of mankind, have indulged in prejudices, and defended them, perhaps, with too much obstinacy; some of these, however, were founded on the mode of thinking of the age, and passed current in those days, as established truths: others continue to exist to the present hour.

The doctors of the 14th century, during the Black Death, did what human knowledge allowed in the context of medicine at that time; their understanding of the disease was not insignificant. Like everyone else, they held onto certain biases and defended them, maybe with too much stubbornness; some of these were based on the mindset of the era and were accepted as established truths back then: others still exist today.

Their successors in the 19th century, ought not therefore to vaunt too highly the pre-eminence of their knowledge, for they too will be subjected to the severe judgment of posterity—they too, will, with reason, be accused of human weakness and want of foresight.

Their successors in the 19th century shouldn't brag too much about their knowledge, because they too will face harsh judgment from future generations—they too will rightly be criticized for human weaknesses and a lack of foresight.

The medical faculty of Paris, the most celebrated of the 14th century, were commissioned to deliver their opinion on the causes of the Black Plague, and to furnish some appropriate regulations with regard to living, during its prevalence. This document is sufficiently remarkable to find a place here.

The medical faculty of Paris, the most well-known of the 14th century, was asked to provide their insights on the causes of the Black Plague and to suggest suitable guidelines for living during its outbreak. This document is notable enough to be included here.

“We, the Members of the College of Physicians of Paris, have, after mature consideration and consultation on the present 51mortality, collected the advice of our old masters in the art, and intend to make known the causes of this pestilence, more clearly than could be done according to the rules and principles of astrology and natural science; we, therefore, declare as follows:—

“We, the Members of the College of Physicians of Paris, have, after careful thought and discussion on the current 51mortality, gathered the insights of our experienced mentors in the field, and we plan to clarify the reasons behind this epidemic more effectively than what can be achieved through the rules and principles of astrology and natural science; we, therefore, declare as follows:—

“It is known that in India, and the vicinity of the Great Sea, the constellations which combated the rays of the sun, and the warmth of the heavenly fire, exerted their power especially against that sea, and struggled violently with its waters. (Hence, vapours often originate which envelope the sun, and convert his light into darkness.) These vapours alternately rose and fell for twenty-eight days; but at last, sun and fire acted so powerfully upon the sea, that they attracted a great portion of it to themselves, and the waters of the ocean arose in the form of vapour; thereby the waters were, in some parts, so corrupted, that the fish which they contained, died. These corrupted waters, however, the heat of the sun could not consume, neither could other wholesome water, hail or snow, and dew, originate therefrom. On the contrary, this vapour spread itself through the air in many places on the earth, and enveloped them in fog.

“It is known that in India and around the Great Sea, the constellations that battled against the sun's rays and the heat of the celestial fire exerted their power particularly against that sea, struggling fiercely with its waters. (As a result, vapors often formed that shrouded the sun, turning its light into darkness.) These vapors rose and fell alternately for twenty-eight days; but eventually, the sun and fire acted so strongly upon the sea that they drew a large portion of it to themselves, causing the ocean’s waters to rise as vapor. Consequently, in some areas, the waters became so contaminated that the fish within them died. However, the sun's heat could not eliminate these polluted waters, nor could any fresh water, hail, snow, or dew form from them. Instead, this vapor spread through the air in many places on earth, engulfing them in fog.”

“Such was the case all over Arabia, in a part of India; in Crete; in the plains and valleys of Macedonia; in Hungary, Albania and Sicily. Should the same thing occur in Sardinia, not a man will be left alive; and the like will continue, so long as the sun remains in the sign of Leo, on all the islands and adjoining countries to which this corrupted sea-wind extends, or has already extended from India. If the inhabitants of those parts do not employ and adhere to the following, or similar means and precepts, we announce to them inevitable death—except the grace of Christ preserve their lives.

“Such was the case all over Arabia, in a part of India; in Crete; in the plains and valleys of Macedonia; in Hungary, Albania, and Sicily. If the same thing happens in Sardinia, no one will be left alive; and this will continue as long as the sun is in the sign of Leo, affecting all the islands and neighboring areas that this tainted sea-wind reaches or has already reached from India. If the people in those regions do not use and follow the methods and guidelines below, we warn them of certain death—unless the grace of Christ saves their lives.”

“We are of opinion, that the constellations, with the aid of Nature, strive, by virtue of their divine might, to protect and heal the human race; and to this end, in union with the rays of the sun, acting through the power of fire, endeavour to break through the mist. Accordingly, within the next ten days, and until the 17th of the ensuing month of July, this mist will be converted into a stinking deleterious rain, whereby the air will be much purified. Now, as soon as this rain shall announce itself, by thunder or hail, every one of you should protect himself from the air; and, as well before as after the rain, kindle a large fire52 of vine-wood, green laurel, or other green wood; wormwood and chamomile should also be burnt in great quantity in the market-places, in other densely inhabited localities, and in the houses. Until the earth is again completely dry, and for three days afterwards, no one ought to go abroad in the fields. During this time the diet should be simple, and people should be cautious in avoiding exposure in the cool of the evening, at night, and in the morning. Poultry and water-fowl, young pork, old beef, and fat meat, in general, should not be eaten; but on the contrary, meat of a proper age, of a warm and dry, but on no account of a heating and exciting nature. Broth should be taken, seasoned with ground pepper, ginger and cloves, especially by those who are accustomed to live temperately, and are yet choice in their diet. Sleep in the day-time is detrimental; it should be taken at night until sunrise, or somewhat longer. At breakfast, one should drink little; supper should be taken an hour before sunset, when more may be drunk than in the morning. Clear light wine, mixed with a fifth or sixth part of water, should be used as a beverage. Dried or fresh fruits, with wine, are not injurious; but highly so without it. Beet-root and other vegetables, whether eaten pickled or fresh, are hurtful; on the contrary, spicy pot-herbs, as sage or rosemary, are wholesome. Cold, moist, watery food is in general prejudicial. Going out at night, and even until three o’clock in the morning, is dangerous, on account of the dew. Only small river fish should be used. Too much exercise is hurtful. The body should be kept warmer than usual, and thus protected from moisture and cold. Rain-water must not be employed in cooking, and every one should guard against exposure to wet weather. If it rain, a little fine treacle should be taken after dinner. Fat people should not sit in the sunshine. Good clear wine should be selected and drunk often, but in small quantities, by day. Olive oil as an article of food, is fatal. Equally injurious are fasting and excessive abstemiousness, anxiety of mind, anger, and immoderate drinking. Young people, in autumn especially, must abstain from all these things, if they do not wish to run a risk of dying of dysentery. In order to keep the body properly open, an enema, or some other simple means, should be employed, when necessary. Bathing is injurious. Men must preserve chastity as they value their lives. Every one should impress53 this on his recollection, but especially those who reside on the coast, or upon an island into which the noxious wind has penetrated.”[160]

“We believe that the constellations, with Nature's help, are trying, through their divine power, to protect and heal humanity. To achieve this, they work together with the sun's rays and the power of fire to try to break through the mist. Therefore, within the next ten days and until the 17th of July, this mist will turn into a foul, harmful rain, which will significantly purify the air. As soon as this rain is announced by thunder or hail, everyone should protect themselves from the air; also, both before and after the rain, make a large fire of vine wood, green laurel, or other types of green wood. Wormwood and chamomile should also be burned in large quantities in marketplaces, densely populated areas, and homes. Until the ground is completely dry again, and for three days after, no one should go out into the fields. During this time, meals should be simple, and people should be careful to avoid exposure in the cool evening, at night, and in the morning. Poultry, waterfowl, young pork, old beef, and fatty meats should be avoided; instead, eat meat that is of proper age, warm, and dry, but definitely not heating or stimulating. Broth should be consumed, seasoned with ground pepper, ginger, and cloves, especially by those who are used to living moderately while still being selective about their food. Sleeping during the day is harmful; sleep should occur at night until sunrise or a little longer. For breakfast, drink very little; supper should be consumed an hour before sunset, allowing for more drinking than in the morning. Clear light wine mixed with one-fifth or one-sixth water should be used as a drink. Dried or fresh fruits with wine are fine; however, highly injurious without it. Beetroot and other vegetables, whether pickled or fresh, are bad for you; in contrast, spicy herbs like sage or rosemary are beneficial. Cold, moist, watery food is generally harmful. Going out at night, even until three in the morning, is dangerous because of the dew. Only small river fish should be eaten. Excessive exercise is harmful. Keep the body warmer than usual to protect against moisture and cold. Do not use rainwater for cooking, and everyone should avoid exposure to wet weather. If it rains, take a little fine treacle after dinner. Overweight individuals should not sit in the sun. Good clear wine should be chosen and drunk frequently, but in small amounts during the day. Olive oil in food is dangerous. Fasting and extreme restraint, mental anxiety, anger, and excessive drinking are equally harmful. Young people, especially in autumn, must avoid all these things, or they risk dying from dysentery. To keep the body properly functioning, an enema or some other simple method should be used when needed. Bathing is harmful. Men should maintain chastity if they value their lives. Everyone should remember this, but especially those who live on the coast or an island where the harmful wind has come.”

On what occasion these strange precepts were delivered can no longer be ascertained, even if it were an object to know it. It must be acknowledged, however, that they do not redound to the credit either of the faculty of Paris, or of the 14th century in general. This famous faculty found themselves under the painful necessity of being wise at command, and of firing a point blank shot of erudition at an enemy who enveloped himself in a dark mist, of the nature of which they had no conception. In concealing their ignorance by authoritative assertions, they suffered themselves, therefore, to be misled; and while endeavouring to appear to the world with eclat, only betrayed to the intelligent their lamentable weakness. Now some might suppose, that in the condition of the sciences of the 14th century, no intelligent physicians existed; but this is altogether at variance with the laws of human advancement, and is contradicted by history. The real knowledge of an age is shewn only in the archives of its literature. Here alone the genius of truth speaks audibly:—here alone men of talent deposit the results of their experience and reflection, without vanity or a selfish object. There is no ground for believing that, in the 14th century, men of this kind were publicly questioned regarding their views; and it is, therefore, the more necessary that impartial history should take up their cause and do justice to their merits.

On what occasion these strange precepts were delivered can no longer be determined, even if it were important to know. However, it's clear that they don't reflect well on the faculty of Paris or on the 14th century as a whole. This famous faculty found themselves in the uncomfortable position of needing to appear knowledgeable on command, trying to hit their opponent with a direct shot of knowledge while wrapped in a fog they didn't understand. By hiding their ignorance with authoritative statements, they allowed themselves to be misled, and in their effort to present a polished image to the world, they only revealed their unfortunate shortcomings to those who were truly aware. Some might think that during the 14th century, there were no knowledgeable physicians, but this contradicts the principles of human progress and is contradicted by history. The genuine knowledge of a time is only evident in the records of its literature. It is here that the essence of truth speaks clearly: here, talented individuals share the outcomes of their experiences and thoughts without vanity or selfish motives. There is no reason to believe that, in the 14th century, such individuals were publicly asked about their opinions; thus, it is even more essential for impartial history to advocate for them and acknowledge their contributions.

The first notice on this subject is due to a very celebrated teacher in Perugia, Gentilis of Foligno, who, on the 18th of June, 1348, fell a sacrifice to the plague, in the faithful discharge of his duty[161]. Attached to Arabian doctrines, and to the universally respected Galen, he, in common with all his contemporaries, believed in a putrid corruption of the blood in the lungs and in the heart, which was occasioned by the pestilential atmosphere, and was forthwith communicated to the whole body. He thought, therefore, that every thing depended upon a sufficient purification of the air, by means of large 54blazing fires of odoriferous wood, in the vicinity of the healthy, as well as of the sick, and also upon an appropriate manner of living; so that the putridity might not overpower the diseased. In conformity with notions derived from the ancients, he depended upon bleeding and purging, at the commencement of the attack, for the purpose of purification; ordered the healthy to wash themselves frequently with vinegar or wine, to sprinkle their dwellings with vinegar, and to smell often to camphor, or other volatile substances. Hereupon he gave, after the Arabian fashion, detailed rules, with an abundance of different medicines, of whose healing powers wonderful things were believed. He laid little stress upon super-lunar influences, so far as respected the malady itself; on which account, he did not enter into the great controversies of the astrologers, but always kept in view, as an object of medical attention, the corruption of the blood in the lungs and heart. He believed in a progressive infection from country to country, according to the notions of the present day; and the contagious power of the disease, even in the vicinity of those affected by plague, was, in his opinion, beyond all doubt[162]. On this point, intelligent contemporaries were all agreed; and in truth, it required no great genius to be convinced of so palpable a fact. Besides, correct notions of contagion have descended from remote antiquity, and were maintained unchanged in the 14th century[163]. So far back as the age of Plato, a knowledge of the contagious power of malignant inflammations of the eye, of which also no physician of the middle ages entertained a doubt[164], was general among the people[165]; yet, in modern times, surgeons have filled volumes with partial controversies on this subject. The whole language of antiquity has adapted itself to the notions of the people, respecting the contagion of pestilential diseases; and their terms were, beyond comparison, more expressive than those in use among the moderns[166].

The first mention of this topic comes from a well-known teacher in Perugia, Gentilis of Foligno, who, on June 18, 1348, succumbed to the plague while faithfully carrying out his duties[161]. He adhered to Arabian teachings and respected Galen, and like his peers, he believed that there was a putrid corruption of the blood in the lungs and heart caused by the infected atmosphere, which then spread to the entire body. Therefore, he thought that everything depended on adequately purifying the air with large, blazing fires of fragrant wood near both the healthy and the sick, as well as maintaining a healthy lifestyle, so the decay wouldn't overwhelm the ill. Following ancient ideas, he relied on bleeding and purging at the onset of the disease for purification; he advised the healthy to wash themselves often with vinegar or wine, to sprinkle their homes with vinegar, and to frequently inhale camphor or other volatile substances. He then provided, after the Arabian style, detailed guidelines with a variety of different medicines, which were believed to have miraculous healing powers. He didn't emphasize celestial influences concerning the disease itself; therefore, he didn't engage in the major debates among astrologers but always focused on the corruption of the blood in the lungs and heart as a medical concern. He believed in a gradual spread of infection from one country to another, according to modern views; and he was certain that the contagious nature of the disease, even near those who had the plague, was indisputable[162]. This viewpoint was widely accepted among intelligent contemporaries; in fact, one didn't need to be exceptionally insightful to be convinced of such an evident fact. Furthermore, accurate ideas about contagion have persisted since ancient times and remained unchanged in the 14th century[163]. As far back as Plato's time, people generally understood the contagious nature of severe eye infections, a fact no physician of the middle ages doubted[164], yet in modern times, surgeons have filled books with partial arguments about this topic. The language of antiquity has adapted to people's understandings regarding the contagion of deadly diseases; their terminology was, by far, more expressive than that of modern times[166].

Arrangements for the protection of the healthy against contagious 55diseases, the necessity of which is shewn from these notions, were regarded by the ancients as useful; and by many, whose circumstances permitted it, were carried into effect in their houses. Even a total separation of the sick from the healthy, that indispensable means of protection against infection by contact, was proposed by physicians of the 2nd century after Christ, in order to check the spreading of leprosy. But it was decidedly opposed, because, as it was alleged, the healing art ought not to be guilty of such harshness[167]. This mildness of the ancients, in whose manner of thinking inhumanity was so often and so undisguisedly conspicuous, might excite surprise, if it were any thing more than apparent. The true ground of the neglect of public protection against pestilential diseases, lay in the general notion and constitution of human society,—it lay in the disregard of human life, of which the great nations of antiquity have given proofs in every page of their history. Let it not be supposed that they wanted knowledge respecting the propagation of contagious diseases. On the contrary, they were as well informed on this subject as the moderns; but this was shewn where individual property, not where human life, on the grand scale, was to be protected. Hence the ancients made a general practice of arresting the progress of murrains among cattle, by a separation of the diseased from the healthy. Their herds alone enjoyed that protection which they held it impracticable to extend to human society, because they had no wish to do so[168]. That the governments in the 14th century, were not yet so far advanced, as to put into practice general regulations for checking the plague, needs no especial proof. Physicians could, therefore, only advise public purifications of the air by means of large fires, as had often been practised in ancient times; and they were obliged to leave it to individual families, either to seek safety in flight, or to shut themselves up in their dwellings[169], a method which answers in 56common plagues, but which here afforded no complete security, because such was the fury of the disease when it was at its height, that the atmosphere of whole cities was penetrated by the infection.

Arrangements to protect healthy individuals from contagious diseases, which are necessary according to these ideas, were seen as beneficial by ancient people. Many who had the means implemented these measures in their homes. In fact, complete separation of the sick from the healthy, which is an essential way to prevent infection through contact, was suggested by physicians in the 2nd century AD to slow the spread of leprosy. However, this idea faced strong opposition because it was claimed that the healing profession shouldn't resort to such harsh measures. The kindness of the ancients, who often showed blatant inhumanity in their thinking, may seem surprising if it weren't so apparent. The real reason for the lack of public protection against plague-like diseases was rooted in the general view and structure of human society—it stemmed from a disregard for human life, as demonstrated by the great civilizations of antiquity throughout their entire history. It shouldn’t be assumed that they lacked knowledge about how contagious diseases spread. On the contrary, they understood this issue as well as we do today; however, their focus was on protecting individual property rather than human life on a larger scale. Therefore, the ancients routinely worked to stop the spread of diseases among livestock by isolating sick animals from healthy ones. Only their herds received the protection they deemed impractical to extend to human society, simply because they didn't want to. It’s evident that governments in the 14th century were not advanced enough to implement widespread measures to combat the plague. As a result, physicians could only advise public air purification through large fires, a method used in ancient times. They had to leave it up to individual families to either flee for safety or confine themselves at home, a strategy that works during common outbreaks but provided no complete security here, as the intensity of the disease at its peak meant that the infection contaminated the air in entire cities.

Of the astral influence which was considered to have originated the “Great Mortality,” physicians and learned men were as completely convinced as of the fact of its reality. A grand conjunction of the three superior planets, Saturn, Jupiter and Mars, in the sign of Aquarius, which took place, according to Guy de Chauliac, on the 24th of March, 1345, was generally received as its principal cause. In fixing the day, this physician, who was deeply versed in astrology, did not agree with others; whereupon there arose various disputations, of weight in that age, but of none in ours; people, however, agreed in this—that conjunctions of the planets infallibly prognosticated great events; great revolutions of kingdoms, new prophets, destructive plagues, and other occurrences which bring distress and horror on mankind. No medical author of the 14th and 15th centuries omits an opportunity of representing them as among the general prognostics of great plagues; nor can we, for our parts, regard the astrology of the middle ages, as a mere offspring of superstition. It has not only, in common with all ideas which inspire and guide mankind, a high historical importance, entirely independent of its error or truth—for the influence of both is equally powerful—but there are also contained in it, as in alchymy, grand thoughts of antiquity, of which modern natural philosophy is so little ashamed that she claims them as her property. Foremost among these, is the idea of the general life which diffuses itself throughout the whole universe, expressed by the greatest Greek sages, and transmitted to the middle ages, through the new Platonic natural philosophy. To this impression of an universal organism, the assumption of a reciprocal influence of terrestrial bodies could not be foreign[170], nor did this cease to correspond with a higher view of nature, until astrologers overstepped the limits of human knowledge with frivolous and mystical calculations.

Of the astrological influence believed to have caused the “Great Mortality,” doctors and scholars were as convinced of its reality as they were of its existence. A major alignment of the three outer planets, Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars, in the sign of Aquarius, which occurred on March 24, 1345, according to Guy de Chauliac, was widely accepted as its main cause. In determining the date, this physician, who was well-versed in astrology, disagreed with others, leading to various debates that were significant during that time but are irrelevant today. People, however, agreed that planetary alignments inevitably foretold major events; significant changes in kingdoms, new prophets, devastating plagues, and other happenings that bring suffering and terror to humanity. No medical writer from the 14th and 15th centuries misses a chance to point out these as indicators of significant plagues; nor can we consider medieval astrology as merely a product of superstition. It holds high historical importance independent of its accuracy or inaccuracy—both can have strong influence. Furthermore, it contains, much like alchemy, significant ideas from ancient times, which modern natural philosophy is not shy about claiming as its own. Chief among these is the concept of universal life that pervades the entire universe, articulated by the greatest Greek thinkers and passed down through the new Platonic natural philosophy to the middle ages. To this notion of a universal organism, the idea of reciprocal influence among earthly bodies was not unrelated, and it only ceased to align with a deeper understanding of nature when astrologers exceeded the bounds of human knowledge with trivial and mystical calculations.

Guy de Chauliac, considers the influence of the conjunction, which was held to be all-potent, as the chief general cause of the Black Plague; and the diseased state of bodies, the corruption 57of the fluids, debility, obstruction, and so forth, as the especial subordinate causes[171]. By these, according to his opinion, the quality of the air, and of the other elements, was so altered, that they set poisonous fluids in motion towards the inward parts of the body, in the same manner as the magnet attracts iron; whence there arose in the commencement fever and the spitting of blood; afterwards, however, a deposition in the form of glandular swellings and inflammatory boils. Herein the notion of an epidemic constitution was set forth clearly, and conformably to the spirit of the age. Of contagion, Guy de Chauliac was completely convinced. He sought to protect himself against it by the usual means[172]; and it was probably he who advised Pope Clement VI. to shut himself up while the plague lasted. The preservation of this pope’s life, however, was most beneficial to the city of Avignon, for he loaded the poor with judicious acts of kindness, took care to have proper attendants provided, and paid physicians himself to afford assistance wherever human aid could avail—an advantage which, perhaps, no other city enjoyed[173]. Nor was the treatment of plague-patients in Avignon by any means objectionable; for, after the usual depletions by bleeding and aperients, where circumstances required them, they endeavoured to bring the buboes to suppuration; they made incisions into the inflammatory boils, or burned them with a red-hot iron, a practice which at all times proves salutary, and in the Black Plague saved many lives. In this city, the Jews, who lived in a state of the greatest filth, were most severely visited, as also the Spaniards, whom Chalin accuses of great intemperance[174].

Guy de Chauliac believed that the alignment of planets, thought to be extremely powerful, was the main cause of the Black Plague. He considered the unhealthy condition of bodies, the corruption of fluids, weakness, blockages, and similar issues to be specific contributing factors57. In his view, these issues altered the quality of the air and other elements, causing poisonous fluids to move towards the inner parts of the body, much like a magnet attracts iron. This led to an initial fever and coughing up blood; later, it resulted in glandular swellings and inflammatory boils. He clearly expressed the idea of an epidemic state in line with the thinking of his time. Guy de Chauliac was completely convinced of contagion and tried to protect himself against it through common methods; he likely advised Pope Clement VI to isolate himself during the plague. The preservation of the pope’s life was greatly beneficial to the city of Avignon because he showed kindness to the poor, ensured they had proper care, and paid doctors to provide help wherever it could be offered—an advantage that perhaps no other city had. The treatment of plague patients in Avignon was also not without merit; after the usual bloodletting and laxatives when needed, they tried to bring the buboes to a head. They made incisions in the inflammatory boils or cauterized them with a red-hot iron, a method that has always been helpful and saved many lives during the Black Plague. In this city, the Jews, who lived in extreme filth, were hit particularly hard, as were the Spaniards, whom Chalin accused of excessive indulgence.

Still more distinct notions on the causes of the plague were stated to his contemporaries in the 14th century, by Galeazzo di Santa Sofia, a learned man, a native of Padua, who likewise 58treated plague-patients at Vienna[175], though in what year is undetermined. He distinguishes carefully pestilence from epidemy and endemy. The common notion of the two first accords exactly with that of an epidemic constitution, for both consist, according to him, in an unknown change or corruption of the air; with this difference, that pestilence calls forth diseases of different kinds; epidemy, on the contrary, always the same disease. As an example of an epidemy, he adduces a cough (influenza) which was observed in all climates at the same time, without perceptible cause; but he recognised the approach of a pestilence, independently of unusual natural phenomena, by the more frequent occurrence of various kinds of fever, to which the modern physicians would assign a nervous and putrid character. The endemy originates, according to him, only in local telluric changes—in deleterious influences which develop themselves in the earth and in the water, without a corruption of the air. These notions were variously jumbled together in his time, like every thing which human understanding separates by too fine a line of limitation. The estimation of cosmical influences, however, in the epidemy and pestilence, is well worthy of commendation; and Santa Sofia, in this respect, not only agrees with the most intelligent persons of the 14th and 15th centuries, but he has also promulgated an opinion which must, even now, serve as a foundation for our scarcely commenced investigations into cosmical influences[176]. Pestilence and epidemy, consist not in alterations of the four primary qualities[177], but in a corruption of the air, powerful, though quite immaterial, and not cognoscible by the senses:—(corruptio aëris non substantialis, sed qualitativa) in a disproportion of the imponderables in the atmosphere, as it would be expressed by the moderns[178]. The causes of the pestilence and epidemy are, first of all, astral influences, 59especially on occasion of planetary conjunctions; then extensive putrefaction of animal and vegetable bodies, and terrestrial corruptions (corruptio in terra); to which also, bad diet and want may contribute. Santa Sofia considers the putrefaction of locusts, that had perished in the sea, and were again thrown up, combined with astral and terrestrial influences, as the cause of the pestilence in the eventful year of the “Great Mortality.”

Still more distinct ideas about the causes of the plague were shared with his contemporaries in the 14th century by Galeazzo di Santa Sofia, a learned man from Padua, who also treated plague patients in Vienna, though the exact year is unclear. He carefully distinguishes between pestilence, epidemic, and endemic. The general understanding of the first two aligns perfectly with that of an epidemic condition, as both arise from an unknown change or corruption of the air; however, pestilence brings about various kinds of diseases, while epidemic always refers to the same disease. As an example of an epidemic, he cites a cough (influenza) that was observed simultaneously across all climates without any obvious cause; yet he identified the onset of a pestilence based not on unusual natural phenomena, but on the increased frequency of different types of fevers, which modern physicians would describe as having a nervous and putrid nature. According to him, endemic arises solely from local telluric changes—from harmful influences originating in the earth and water, without any corruption of the air. These concepts were often confused in his time, much like everything else that human understanding tries to categorize too rigidly. However, his recognition of cosmic influences in epidemic and pestilence is commendable; in this regard, Santa Sofia not only aligns with the most insightful thinkers of the 14th and 15th centuries, but he also offered an idea that should still serve as a basis for our ongoing research into cosmic influences. Pestilence and epidemic do not consist of changes in the four primary qualities, but rather in an alteration of the air, which is powerful yet quite immaterial and not perceivable by the senses: (corruptio aëris non substantialis, sed qualitativa) as a misunderstanding of the balance of imponderables in the atmosphere, which would be expressed by modern terms. The causes of pestilence and epidemic are primarily astral influences, especially during planetary conjunctions; then extensive decay of animal and plant matter, and terrestrial corruption, to which poor diet and deprivation may also contribute. Santa Sofia believes the decay of locusts that had died in the sea and were washed ashore, combined with astral and terrestrial influences, caused the plague during the notable year of the “Great Mortality.”

All the fevers which were called forth by the pestilence, are, according to him, of the putrid kind; for they originate principally from putridity of the heart’s blood, which inevitably follows the inhalation of infected air. The Oriental Plague is, sometimes, but by no means always, occasioned by pestilence (?), which imparts to it a character (qualitas occulta) hostile to human nature. It originates frequently from other causes, among which, this physician was aware that contagion was to be reckoned; and it deserves to be remarked, that he held epidemic small-pox and measles to be infallible forerunners of the plague, as do the physicians and people of the East[179], at the present day.

All the fevers caused by the pestilence are, according to him, of the rotting kind; they mainly result from the decay of the heart's blood, which inevitably follows breathing in infected air. The Oriental Plague is sometimes, but not always, caused by pestilence (?), which gives it a quality (qualitas occulta) that is harmful to human nature. It often has other causes, among which this physician recognized contagion as important; it's worth noting that he believed epidemic smallpox and measles are reliable precursors to the plague, just as physicians and people in the East do today[179].

In the exposition of his therapeutical views of the plague, a clearness of intellect is again shewn by Santa Sofia, which reflects credit on the age. It seemed to him to depend, 1st, on an evacuation of putrid matters, by purgatives and bleeding: yet he did not sanction the employment of these means indiscriminately, and without consideration; least of all where the condition of the blood was healthy. He also declared himself decidedly against bleeding ad deliquium (venæ sectio eradicativa). 2d, Strengthening of the heart and prevention of putrescence. 3d, Appropriate regimen. 4th, Improvement of the air. 5th, Appropriate treatment of tumid glands and inflammatory boils, with emollient, or even stimulating poultices (mustard, lily-bulbs), as well as with red-hot gold and iron. Lastly, 6th, Attention to prominent symptoms. The stores of the Arabian pharmacy, which he brought into action to meet all these indications, were indeed very considerable; it is to be observed, however, that, for the most part, gentle means were accumulated, which, in case of abuse, would do no harm; for the character of the Arabian system of medicine, whose principles 60were everywhere followed at this time, was mildness and caution. On this account too, we cannot believe that a very prolix treatise by Marsigli di Santa Sofia[180], a contemporary relative of Galeazzo, on the prevention and treatment of plague, can have caused much harm, although, perhaps, even in the 14th century, an agreeable latitude and confident assertions respecting things which no mortal has investigated, or which it is quite a matter of indifference to distinguish, were considered as proofs of a valuable practical talent.

In his explanation of his therapeutic views on the plague, Santa Sofia shows a clear intellect that reflects positively on his time. He believed it relied on, first, removing harmful substances through purgatives and bleeding; however, he didn't support using these methods indiscriminately or without careful thought, especially not when the blood was healthy. He was also firmly against excessive bleeding. Second, he focused on strengthening the heart and preventing decay. Third, he recommended an appropriate regimen. Fourth, he emphasized improving the air quality. Fifth, he advocated for proper treatment of swollen glands and inflammatory boils using soothing or even stimulating poultices (like mustard and lily bulbs), as well as red-hot gold and iron. Lastly, he advised paying attention to noticeable symptoms. The resources from Arabian medicine that he utilized to address all these points were impressive; it should be noted, though, that mostly gentle methods were included, which wouldn’t cause harm if misused. This aligns with the nature of the Arabian medical system, which was characterized by mildness and caution. Therefore, we can't believe that a lengthy treatise by Marsigli di Santa Sofia, a contemporary relative of Galeazzo, on the prevention and treatment of the plague could have caused much harm, even though, perhaps in the 14th century, a certain flexibility and confident assertions about things that no one has examined, or that are indifferent to distinguish, were seen as evidence of valuable practical skill.

The agreement of contemporary and later writers, shews that the published views of the most celebrated physicians of the 14th century, were those generally adopted. Among these, Chalin de Vinario is the most experienced. Though devoted to astrology, still more than his distinguished contemporary, he acknowledges the great power of terrestrial influences, and expresses himself very sensibly on the indisputable doctrine of contagion, endeavouring thereby to apologize for many surgeons and physicians of his time, who neglected their duty[181]. He asserted boldly, and with truth, “that all epidemic diseases might become contagious[182], and all fevers epidemic,” which attentive observers of all subsequent ages have confirmed.

The agreement of modern and later writers shows that the published views of the most famous physicians of the 14th century were widely accepted. Among them, Chalin de Vinario is the most experienced. Although he was dedicated to astrology, even more than his notable contemporary, he recognizes the significant impact of earthly influences and discusses the undeniable idea of contagion sensibly, trying to defend many surgeons and physicians of his time who neglected their responsibilities[181]. He boldly and truthfully asserted that “all epidemic diseases might become contagious[182], and all fevers epidemic,” which careful observers of all later periods have confirmed.

He delivered his sentiments on blood-letting with sagacity, as an experienced physician; yet he was unable, as may be imagined, to moderate the desire for bleeding shewn by the ignorant monks. He was averse to draw blood from the veins of patients under fourteen years of age; but counteracted inflammatory excitement in them by cupping; and endeavoured to moderate the inflammation of the tumid glands by leeches[183]. 61Most of those who were bled, died; he therefore reserved this remedy for the plethoric; especially for the papal courtiers, and the hypocritical priests, whom he saw gratifying their sensual desires, and imitating Epicurus, whilst they pompously pretended to follow Christ[184]. He recommended burning the boils with a red-hot iron, only in the plague without fever, which occurred in single cases[185]; and was always ready to correct those over-hasty surgeons, who, with fire and violent remedies, did irremediable injury to their patients[186]. Michael Savonarola, professor in Ferrara (1462), reasoning on the susceptibility of the human frame to the influence of pestilential infection, as the cause of such various modifications of disease, expresses himself as a modern physician would on this point; and an adoption of the principle of contagion was the foundation of his definition of the plague[187]. No less worthy of observation are the views of the celebrated Valescus of Taranta, who, during the final visitation of the Black Death, in 1382, practised as a physician at Montpellier, and handed down to posterity what has been repeated in innumerable treatises on plague, which were written during the 15th and 16th centuries[188].

He shared his thoughts on bloodletting wisely, as an experienced doctor; however, he couldn't control the thirst for bloodletting displayed by the ignorant monks. He was reluctant to draw blood from patients under fourteen; instead, he tackled their inflammatory issues with cupping and tried to reduce the swelling of their glands using leeches[183]. 61Most of those who were bled ended up dying, so he saved this treatment for the overly full, particularly the papal courtiers and the pretentious priests he saw indulging their desires and mimicking Epicurus while they falsely claimed to follow Christ[184]. He suggested burning boils with a red-hot iron only in cases of plague without fever, which happened rarely[185]; and he was always ready to correct the precocious surgeons who, with fire and extreme treatments, did irreparable damage to their patients[186]. Michael Savonarola, a professor in Ferrara (1462), argued about how the human body is affected by pestilential infections causing various disease patterns, expressing this in a way that a modern physician would; the acceptance of contagion was the basis of his definition of the plague[187]. Also noteworthy are the views of the renowned Valescus of Taranta, who practiced as a physician in Montpellier during the last outbreak of the Black Death in 1382 and left behind insights that have been repeated in countless treatises on plague written in the 15th and 16th centuries[188].

Of all these notions and views regarding the plague, whose development we have represented, there are two especially, which are prominent in historical importance:—1st, The opinion of learned physicians, that the pestilence, or epidemic constitution, is the parent of various kinds of disease; that the plague sometimes, indeed, but by no means always, originates from it: that, to speak in the language of the moderns, the pestilence bears the same relation to contagion, that a predisposing cause does to an occasional cause: and 2dly, the universal conviction of the contagious power of that disease.

Of all these ideas and perspectives about the plague that we have discussed, two stand out due to their historical significance: 1st, the belief among knowledgeable doctors that the pestilence, or epidemic condition, is the source of various kinds of disease; that the plague sometimes arises from it, but definitely not all the time; in modern terms, the pestilence is to contagion what a predisposing cause is to an occasional cause; and 2nd, the widespread belief in the contagious nature of that disease.

Contagion gradually attracted more notice: it was thought 62that in it, the most powerful occasional cause might be avoided; the possibility of protecting whole cities by separation, became gradually more evident; and so horrifying was the recollection of the eventful year of the “Great Mortality,” that before the close of the 14th century, ere the ill effects of the Black Plague had ceased, nations endeavoured to guard against the return of this enemy, by an earnest and effectual defence.

Contagion gradually gained more attention: it was believed 62that in it, the most potent occasional cause could be excluded; the potential to protect entire cities through isolation became increasingly clear; and the memory of the dreadful year of the “Great Mortality” was so terrifying that before the end of the 14th century, before the harmful effects of the Black Plague had faded, countries tried to safeguard themselves against the return of this threat with serious and effective measures.

The first regulation which was issued for this purpose, originated with Viscount Bernabo, and is dated the 17th Jan. 1374. “Every plague-patient was to be taken out of the city into the fields, there to die or to recover. Those who attended upon a plague-patient, were to remain apart for ten days, before they again associated with any body. The priests were to examine the diseased, and point out to special commissioners the persons infected; under punishment of the confiscation of their goods, and of being burned alive. Whoever imported the plague, the state condemned his goods to confiscation. Finally, none except those who were appointed for that purpose, were to attend plague-patients, under penalty of death and confiscation[189].”

The first regulation issued for this purpose came from Viscount Bernabo, dated January 17, 1374. “Every plague patient was to be removed from the city to the fields, where they would either die or recover. Those who cared for a plague patient were to stay away from others for ten days before mixing again. The priests were to inspect the sick and inform special commissioners about the infected, under threat of confiscation of their belongings and being burned alive. Anyone who brought the plague into the area would have their goods confiscated by the state. Lastly, only those appointed for this duty were allowed to attend to plague patients, with a penalty of death and confiscation.”

These orders, in correspondence with the spirit of the 14th century, are sufficiently decided to indicate a recollection of the good effects of confinement, and of keeping at a distance those suspected of having plague. It was said that Milan itself, by a rigorous barricado of three houses in which the plague had broken out, maintained itself free from the “Great Mortality,” for a considerable time[190]; and examples of the preservation of individual families, by means of a strict separation, were certainly very frequent. That these orders must have caused universal affliction from their uncommon severity, as we know to have been especially the case in the city of Reggio, may be easily conceived; but Bernabo did not suffer himself to be deterred from his purpose by fear—on the contrary, when the plague returned in the year 1383, he forbad the admission of people from infected places into his territories, on pain of death[191]. We have now, it is true, no account how far he succeeded; yet it is 63to be supposed that he arrested the disease, for it had long lost the property of the Black Death, to spread abroad in the air the contagious matter which proceeded from the lungs, charged with putridity, and to taint the atmosphere of whole cities by the vast numbers of the sick. Now that it had resumed its milder form, so that it infected only by contact, it admitted being confined within individual dwellings, as easily as in modern times.

These orders, reflecting the spirit of the 14th century, were pretty clear about the benefits of quarantine and keeping away from those suspected of having the plague. It was said that Milan managed to stay free from the “Great Mortality” for quite a while by rigorously blocking off three houses where the plague had broken out. There were definitely many examples of individual families being saved through strict separation. It's easy to imagine that these orders caused widespread distress due to their unusual harshness, as was especially the case in the city of Reggio. However, Bernabo wasn’t swayed by fear—when the plague came back in 1383, he banned people from infected areas from entering his lands, punishable by death. We don’t have records of how successful he was, but it’s reasonable to think that he contained the disease, as it had lost its deadly ability to spread through the air from infected lungs and poison entire cities with large numbers of sick people. Now that it had taken on a milder form and could only be spread through contact, it could be contained within individual homes, much like it can today.

Bernabo’s example was imitated; nor was there any century more appropriate for recommending to governments strong regulations against the plague, than the 14th; for when it broke out in Italy, in the year 1399, and still demanded new victims, it was for the 16th time; without reckoning frequent visitations of measles and small-pox. In this same year, Viscount John, in milder terms than his predecessor, ordered that no stranger should be admitted from infected places, and that the city gates should be strictly guarded. Infected houses were to be ventilated for at least eight or ten days, and purified from noxious vapours by fires, and by fumigations with balsamic and aromatic substances. Straw, rags, and the like, were to be burned; and the bedsteads which had been used, set out for four days in the rain or the sunshine, so that, by means of the one or the other, the morbific vapour might be destroyed. No one was to venture to make use of clothes or beds out of infected dwellings, unless they had been previously washed and dried either at the fire or in the sun. People were, likewise, to avoid, as long as possible, occupying houses which had been frequented by plague-patients[192].

Bernabo’s example was followed; and there wasn't a better century to recommend to governments strong regulations against the plague than the 14th. When it broke out in Italy in 1399, it was the 16th time it had done so, not counting frequent outbreaks of measles and smallpox. That same year, Viscount John, in gentler terms than his predecessor, ordered that no one from infected areas should be allowed into the city, and that the gates should be closely monitored. Infected houses had to be aired out for at least eight or ten days and cleansed of harmful vapors through fires and fumigations with aromatic substances. Straw, rags, and similar items were to be burned, and any beds previously used were to be left outside in the rain or sun for four days to destroy the harmful vapor. No one was allowed to use clothing or bedding from infected homes unless they had been washed and dried either by fire or in the sun. People were also advised to avoid, for as long as possible, staying in houses that had been occupied by plague patients[192].

We cannot precisely perceive in these an advance towards general regulations; and perhaps people were convinced of the insurmountable impediments which opposed the separation of open inland countries, where bodies of people connected together could not be brought, even by the most obdurate severity, to renounce the habit of a profitable intercourse.

We can’t clearly see any progress toward overall regulations here; and maybe people believed in the insurmountable obstacles that stood in the way of separating open inland regions, where groups of people connected to one another couldn’t be forced, no matter how harshly, to give up their profitable interactions.

Doubtless it is nature which has done the most to banish the Oriental plague from western Europe, where the increasing cultivation of the earth, and the advancing order in civilized society, have prevented it from remaining domesticated; which it most probably was in the more ancient times.

Certainly, it’s nature that has played the biggest role in driving the Oriental plague out of Western Europe, where the growing farming activities and the improving organization of civil society have stopped it from becoming established; something it likely was in ancient times.

64

64

In the 15th century, during which it broke out seventeen times in different places in Europe[193], it was of the more consequence to oppose a barrier to its entrance from Asia, Africa, and Greece (which had become Turkish); for it would have been difficult for it to maintain itself indigenously any longer. Among the southern commercial states, however, which were called on to make the greatest exertions to this end, it was principally Venice, formerly so severely attacked by the Black Plague, that put the necessary restraint upon the perilous profits of the merchant. Until towards the end of the 15th century, the very considerable intercourse with the East was free and unimpeded. Ships of commercial cities had often brought over the plague: nay, the former irruption of the “Great Mortality” itself had been occasioned by navigators. For, as in the latter end of Autumn, 1347, four ships full of plague-patients returned from the Levant to Genoa, the disease spread itself there with astonishing rapidity. On this account, in the following year, the Genoese forbad the entrance of suspected ships into their port. These sailed to Pisa and other cities on the coast, where already nature had made such mighty preparations for the reception of the Black Plague, and what we have already described took place in consequence[194].

In the 15th century, when it broke out seventeen times in different places in Europe[193], it was crucial to set up a barrier against its arrival from Asia, Africa, and Greece (which had become Turkish); otherwise, it would have been hard for it to survive locally for much longer. Among the southern trading states that were called to exert the most effort in this regard, it was mainly Venice, which had previously suffered greatly from the Black Plague, that imposed the necessary restrictions on the dangerous profits of merchants. Up until the end of the 15th century, the significant trade with the East was mostly unrestricted. Ships from trading cities often brought the plague with them: in fact, the earlier outbreak of the “Great Mortality” was caused by sailors. In late Autumn of 1347, four ships filled with plague victims returned from the Levant to Genoa, and the disease spread there with astonishing speed. Because of this, the following year, the Genoese prohibited suspected ships from entering their port. These ships then went to Pisa and other coastal cities, where nature had already made significant preparations for the arrival of the Black Plague, and what we have already described occurred as a result[194].

In the year 1485, when, among the cities of northern Italy, Milan especially felt the scourge of the plague, a special council of health, consisting of three nobles, was established at Venice, who probably tried every thing in their power to prevent the entrance of this disease, and gradually called into activity all those regulations which have served in later times as a pattern for the other southern states of Europe. Their endeavours were, however, not crowned with complete success; on which account their powers were increased, in the year 1504, by granting them the right of life and death over those who violated the regulations[195]. Bills of health were probably first introduced in the year 1527, during a fatal plague[196] which visited Italy for five years (1525–30), and called forth redoubled caution.

In 1485, when the plague hit northern Italy hard, especially in Milan, a special health council made up of three nobles was set up in Venice. They likely tried everything they could to prevent the spread of the disease and slowly activated all the regulations that later served as a model for other southern European states. However, their efforts weren’t fully successful, which led to their powers being expanded in 1504, granting them the authority to impose life-and-death penalties on those who broke the regulations[195]. Health certificates were probably first introduced in 1527 during a deadly plague[196] that struck Italy for five years (1525–30), prompting even greater caution.

The first lazarettos were established upon islands at some distance from the city, seemingly as early as the year 1485. Here all 65strangers coming from places where the existence of plague was suspected were detained. If it appeared in the city itself, the sick were despatched with their families to what was called the Old Lazaretto, were there furnished with provisions and medicines, and, when they were cured, were detained, together with all those who had had intercourse with them, still forty days longer in the New Lazaretto, situated on another island. All these regulations were every year improved, and their needful rigour was increased, so that from the year 1585 onwards, no appeal was allowed from the sentence of the Council of Health; and the other commercial nations gradually came to the support of the Venetians, by adopting corresponding regulations[197]. Bills of health, however, were not general until the year 1665[198].

The first lazarettos were set up on islands located some distance from the city, apparently as early as 1485. Here, all strangers arriving from areas suspected of having plague were held. If the disease appeared in the city itself, the sick, along with their families, were sent to what was known as the Old Lazaretto, where they received food and medicine. Once they were cured, they, along with anyone who had come into contact with them, had to stay for another forty days in the New Lazaretto, located on a different island. Every year, these regulations were refined, and the necessary strictness was intensified. Starting in 1585, no appeals were allowed against the decisions of the Council of Health, and other trading nations gradually supported the Venetians by implementing similar regulations[197]. However, health certificates did not become standard until 1665[198].

The appointment of a forty days’ detention, whence quarantines derive their name, was not dictated by caprice, but probably had a medical origin, which is derivable in part from the doctrine of critical days; for the fortieth day, according to the most ancient notions, has been always regarded as the last of ardent diseases, and the limit of separation between these and those which are chronic. It was the custom to subject lying-in women for forty days to a more exact superintendence. There was a good deal also said in medical works of forty day epochs in the formation of the fœtus, not to mention that the alchymists expected more durable revolutions in forty days, which period they called the philosophical month.

The decision to detain someone for forty days, which is where the term quarantines comes from, wasn't made on a whim but likely had a medical basis tied to the idea of critical days. The fortieth day has always been viewed as the final stage of severe illnesses and the point of separation between those and chronic conditions. It was common practice to monitor women after childbirth closely for forty days. Medical literature also discussed forty-day periods in fetal development, and alchemists believed that significant transformations occurred over forty days, referring to this time frame as the philosophical month.

This period being generally held to prevail in natural processes, it appeared reasonable to assume, and legally to establish it, as that required for the development of latent principles of contagion, since public regulations cannot dispense with decisions of this kind, even though they should not be wholly justified by the nature of the case. Great stress has likewise been laid on theological and legal grounds, which were certainly of greater weight in the fifteenth century than in more modern times[199].

This period is generally accepted to influence natural processes, so it seemed reasonable to assume, and legally establish, that it was necessary for the development of hidden principles of contagion, since public regulations cannot ignore decisions of this kind, even if they aren't completely justified by the specifics of the situation. There has also been significant emphasis on theological and legal reasons, which were definitely more important in the fifteenth century than in more recent times[199].

66

66

On this matter, however, we cannot decide, since our only object here is to point out the origin of a political means of protection against a disease, which has been the greatest impediment to civilization within the memory of man; a means, that, like Jenner’s vaccine, after the small-pox had ravaged Europe for twelve hundred years, has diminished the check which mortality puts on the progress of civilization, and thus given to the life and manners of the nations of this part of the world a new direction, the result of which we cannot foretell.

On this issue, though, we can’t make a decision, since our main goal here is just to highlight the origin of a political strategy for protecting against a disease that has been a major barrier to civilization within living memory; a strategy that, like Jenner's vaccine, after smallpox had devastated Europe for twelve hundred years, has reduced the constraints that death places on the advancement of civilization, and thus given the lives and customs of the nations in this part of the world a new path, the outcome of which we can't predict.


67

67

APPENDIX.

68

68

I.

Das alte Geisslerlied
NACH MASSMANN’S AUSGABE VON HERRN PROFESSOR LACHMANN MIT DER HANDSCHRIFT VERGLICHEN.

Sve siner sele wille pleghen
De sal gelden unde weder geuen
So wert siner sele raed
Des help uns leue herre goed
Nu tredet here we botsen wille5
Vle wi io de hetsen helle
Lucifer is en bose geselle
Sven her hauet
Mit peke he en lauet
Datz vle wi ef wir hauen sin10
Des help uns maria koninghin
Das wir dines kindes hulde win
Jesus crist de wart ge vanghen
An en cruce wart he ge hanghen
Dat cruce wart des blodes rod15
Wer klaghen sin marter unde sin dod
Sunder war mide wilt tu mi lonen
Dre negele unde en dornet crone
Das cruce vrone en sper en stich
Sunder datz leyd ich dor dich20
Was wltu nu liden dor mich
So rope wir herre mit luden done
Unsen denst den nem to lone
Be hode uns vor der helle nod
Des bidde wi dich dor dinen dod25
Dor god vor gete wi unse blot
Dat is uns tho den suden guot
Maria muoter koninginghe
Dor dines leuen kindes minne
Al unse nod si dir ghe klaghet30
Des help uns moter maghet reyne.
69De erde beuet och kleuen de steyne
Lebe hertze du salt weyne
Wir wenen trene mit den oghen
Unde hebben des so guden louen35
Mit unsen sinnen unde mit hertzen
Dor uns leyd crist vil manighen smertzen
Nu slaed w sere
Dor cristus ere.
Dor god nu latet de sunde mere40
Dor god nu latet de sunde varen
Se wil sich god ouer uns en barmen
Maria stund in grotzen noden
Do se ire leue kint sa doden
En svert dor ire sele snet45
Sunder dat la di wesen led
In korter vrist
God tornich ist
Jesus wart gelauet mid gallen
Des sole wi an en cruce vallen50
Er heuet uch mit uwen armen
Dat sic god ouer uns en barme
Jesus dorch dine namen dry
Nu make uns hir van sunde vry
Jesus dor dine wnden rod55
Be hod uns vor den gehen dod
Dat he sende sinen geist
Und uns dat kortelike leist
De vrowe unde man ir e tobreken
Dat wil god selven an en wreken60
Sveuel pik und och de galle
Dat gutet de duuel in se alle
Vor war sint se des duuels spot
Dor vor behode uns herre god
De e de ist en reyne leuen65
De had uns god selven gheuen
Ich rade uch vrowen unde mannen
Dor god gy solen houard annen
Des biddet uch de arme sele
Dorch god nu latet houard mere70
Dor god nu latet houard varen
So wil sich god ouer uns en barmen
70Cristus rep in hemelrike
Sinen engelen al gelike
De cristenheit wil mi ent wichen75
Des wil lan och se vor gaen
Marie bat ire kint so sere
Leue kint la se di boten
Dat wil ich sceppen dat se moten
Bekeren sich.80
Des bidde ich dich
Gi logenere
Gy meynen ed sverer
Gi bichten reyne und lan de sunde uch ruwen
So wil sich god in uch vor nuwen85
Owe du arme wokerere
Du bringest en lod up en punt
Dat senket din an der helle grunt
Ir morder und ir straten rouere
Ir sint dem leuen gode un mere90
Ir ne wilt uch ouer nemende barmen
Des sin gy eweliken vor loren
Were dusse bote nicht ge worden
De cristenheit wer gar vorsunden
De leyde duuel had se ge bunden95
Maria had lost unsen bant
Sunder ich saghe di leue mere
Sunte peter is portenere
Wende dich an en he letset dich in
He bringhet dich vor de koninghin100
Leue herre sunte Michahel
Du bist en plegher aller sel
Be hode uns vor der helle nod
Dat do dor dines sceppers dod.

71

71

The Ancient Song of the Flagellants.
ACCORDING TO MASSMANN’S EDITION COMPARED WITH THE MS. BY PROFESSOR LACHMANN.

(Translation.)
Whoever to save his soul is fain,
Must pay and render back again.
His safety so shall he consult:
Help us, good Lord, to this result.
Ye that repent your crimes, draw nigh.5
From the burning hell we fly,
From Satan’s wicked company.
Whom he leads
With pitch he feeds.
If we be wise we this shall flee.10
Maria! Queen! we trust in thee,
To move thy Son to sympathy.
Jesus Christ was captive led,
And to the cross was riveted.
The cross was reddened with his gore15
And we his martyrdom deplore.
“Sinner, canst thou to me atone.
Three pointed nails, a thorny crown,
The holy cross, a spear, a wound,
These are the cruel pangs I found.20
What wilt thou, sinner, bear for me?”
Lord, with loud voice we answer thee,
Accept our service in return,
And save us lest in hell we burn.
We, through thy death, to thee have sued.25
For God in heaven we shed our blood:
This for our sins will work to good.
Blessed Maria! Mother! Queen!
Through thy loved Son’s redeeming mean
Be all our wants to thee portrayed.30
Aid us, Mother! spotless maid!
72Trembles the earth, the rocks are rent[200],
Fond heart of mine, thou must relent.
Tears from our sorrowing eyes we weep;
Therefore so firm our faith we keep35
With all our hearts—with all our senses.
Christ bore his pangs for our offences.
Ply well the scourge for Jesus’ sake,
And God through Christ your sins shall take.
For love of God abandon sin,40
To mend your vicious lives begin,
So shall we his mercy win.
Direful was Maria’s pain
When she beheld her dear One slain.
Pierced was her soul as with a dart:45
Sinner, let this affect thy heart.
The time draws near
When God in anger shall appear.
Jesus was refreshed with gall:
Prostrate crosswise let us fall,50
Then with uplifted arms arise,
That God with us may sympathize.
Jesus, by thy titles three[201],
From our bondage set us free.
Jesus, by thy precious blood,55
Save us from the fiery flood.
Lord, our helplessness defend,
And to our aid thy Spirit send.
If man and wife their vows should break
God will on such his vengeance wreak.60
Brimstone and pitch, and mingled gall,
Satan pours on such sinners all.
Truly, the devil’s scorn are they:
Therefore, O Lord, thine aid we pray.
Wedlock’s an honourable tie65
Which God himself doth sanctify.
By this warning, man, abide,
God shall surely punish pride.
Let your precious soul entreat you,
Lay down pride lest vengeance meet you.70
I do beseech ye, pride forsake,
So God on us shall pity take.
73Christ in heaven, where he commands,
Thus addressed his angel bands:—
“Christendom dishonours me,75
Therefore her ruin I decree.”
Then Mary thus implored her Son:—
“Penance to thee, loved Child, be done;
That she repent be mine the care;
Stay then thy wrath, and hear my prayer.”80
Ye liars!
Ye that break your sacrament,
Shrive ye throughly and repent.
Your heinous sins sincerely rue,
So shall the Lord your hearts renew.85
Woe! usurer, though thy wealth abound,
For every ounce thou mak’st a pound
Shall sink thee to the hell profound.
Ye murd’rers, and ye robbers all,
The wrath of God on you shall fall,90
Mercy ye ne’er to others shew,
None shall ye find; but endless woe.
Had it not been for our contrition,
All Christendom had met perdition.
Satan had bound her in his chain;95
Mary hath loosed her bonds again.
Glad news I bring thee, sinful mortal,
In heaven Saint Peter keeps the portal,
Apply to him with suppliant mien,
He bringeth thee before thy Queen.100
Benignant Michael, blessed saint,
Guardian of souls, receive our plaint.
Through thy Almighty Maker’s death,
Preserve us from the hell beneath.

74

II.

Investigation of the Jews accused of poisoning the wells.[202].

Answer from the Castellan of Chillon to the City of Strasburg, together with a Copy of the Inquisition and Confession of several Jews confined in the Castle of Chillon on suspicion of poisoning.    Anno 1348.

Response from the Castellan of Chillon to the City of Strasbourg, along with a Copy of the Inquiry and Confession of several Jews held in the Castle of Chillon on suspicion of poisoning. Anno 1348.

To the Honorable the Mayor, Senate and Citizens of the City of Strasburg, the Castellan of Chillon, Deputy of the Bailiff of Chablais, sendeth greeting with all due submission and respect.

To the Honorable Mayor, Senate, and Citizens of the City of Strasburg, the Castellan of Chillon, Deputy of the Bailiff of Chablais, sends greetings with all due respect and humility.


Understanding that you desire to be made acquainted with the confession of the Jews, and the proofs brought forward against them, I certify, by these presents, to you, and each of you that desires to be informed, that they of Berne have had a copy of the inquisition and confession of the Jews who lately resided in the places specified, and who were accused of putting poison into the wells and several other places: as also the most conclusive evidence of the truth of the charge preferred against them. Many Jews were put to the question, others being excused from it, because they confessed, and were brought to trial and burnt. Several Christians, also, who had poison given them by the Jews for the purpose of destroying the Christians, were put on the wheel and tortured. This burning of the Jews and torturing of the said Christians took place in many parts of the county of Savoy.

Understanding that you want to know about the confession of the Jews and the evidence presented against them, I hereby inform you, and anyone else who wishes to be informed, that those in Berne have a copy of the investigation and confession of the Jews who recently lived in the specified locations and who were accused of poisoning the wells and other places. They also have the most compelling evidence supporting the charges against them. Many Jews were interrogated, while others were excused because they confessed and were tried and executed by burning. Several Christians who were given poison by the Jews to harm them were tortured on the wheel. This execution of the Jews and torture of the Christians occurred in various parts of the county of Savoy.

Fare you well.

Farewell.


The Confession made on the 15th day of September, in the year of our Lord 1348, in the Castle of Chillon, by the Jews arrested in Neustadt, on the Charge of Poisoning the Wells, Springs and other places; also Food, &c., with the design of destroying and extirpating all Christians.

The confession made on September 15th, in the year 1348, at the Castle of Chillon, by the Jews arrested in Neustadt, on the charge of poisoning the wells, springs, and other places; also food, etc., with the intent to destroy and eliminate all Christians.

I. Balavignus, a Jewish physician, inhabitant of Thonon, was arrested at Chillon in consequence of being found in the neighbourhood. 75He was put for a short time to the rack, and on being taken down, confessed, after much hesitation, that, about ten weeks before, the Rabbi Jacob of Toledo, who, because of a citation, had resided at Chamberi since Easter, sent him, by a Jewish boy, some poison in the mummy of an egg: it was a powder sewed up in a thin leathern pouch accompanied by a letter, commanding him, on penalty of excommunication, and by his required obedience to the law, to throw this poison into the larger and more frequented wells of the town of Thonon, to poison those who drew water there. He was further enjoined not to communicate the circumstance to any person whatever, under the same penalty. In conformity with this command of the Jewish rabbis and doctors of the law, he, Balavignus, distributed the poison in several places, and acknowledged having one evening placed a certain portion under a stone in a spring on the shore at Thonon. He further confessed that the said boy brought various letters of a similar import, addressed to others of his nation, and particularly specified some directed severally to Mossoiet, Banditon, and Samoleto of Neustadt; to Musseo Abramo and Aquetus of Montreantz, Jews residing at Thurn in Vivey; to Benetonus and his son at St. Moritz; to Vivianus Jacobus, Aquetus and Sonetus, Jews at Aquani. Several letters of a like nature were sent to Abram and Musset, Jews at Moncheoli; and the boy told him that he had taken many others to different and distant places, but he did not recollect to whom they were addressed. Balavignus further confessed that, after having put the poison into the spring at Thonon, he had positively forbidden his wife and children to drink the water, but had not thought fit to assign a reason. He avowed the truth of this statement, and, in the presence of several credible witnesses, swore by his law, and the Five Books of Moses, to every item of his deposition.

I. Balavignus, a Jewish doctor living in Thonon, was arrested at Chillon for being found in the area. 75 He was subjected to the rack for a short time, and when he was taken down, he reluctantly confessed that about ten weeks prior, Rabbi Jacob of Toledo, who had been living in Chamberi since Easter due to a summons, sent him some poison inside the mummy of an egg through a Jewish boy. It was a powder packed in a thin leather pouch, along with a letter instructing him, under threat of excommunication and his obligation to obey the law, to pour this poison into the larger, more popular wells of Thonon to poison those who drew water from them. He was also ordered not to tell anyone about this, under the same penalty. Following this order from the Jewish rabbis and legal scholars, he, Balavignus, distributed the poison in several locations and admitted to placing a portion under a stone at a spring on the Thonon shore one evening. He also confessed that the boy delivered various letters with similar instructions to other members of his community, specifically mentioning those addressed to Mossoiet, Banditon, and Samoleto of Neustadt; Musseo Abramo and Aquetus of Montreantz, Jews living at Thurn in Vivey; and to Benetonus and his son at St. Moritz; to Vivianus Jacobus, Aquetus, and Sonetus, Jews at Aquani. Several similar letters were sent to Abram and Musset, Jews at Moncheoli; and the boy informed him that he had taken many others to different and far-off places, but he couldn't remember who they were addressed to. Balavignus also admitted that after placing the poison in the spring at Thonon, he explicitly told his wife and children not to drink the water, but he didn’t give them a reason. He confirmed the truth of this statement, and in front of several credible witnesses, he swore by his law and the Five Books of Moses to every detail of his testimony.

On the day following, Balavignus, voluntarily and without torture, ratified the above confession verbatim before many persons of character, and, of his own accord, acknowledged that, on returning one day from Tour near Vivey, he had thrown into a well below Mustruez, namely that of La Conerayde, a quantity of the poison tied up in a rag, given to him for the purpose by Aquetus of Montreantz, an inhabitant of the said Tour: that he had acquainted Manssiono, and his son Delosaz, residents of Neustadt, with the circumstance of his having done so, and advertised them not to drink of the water. He described the colour of the poison as being red and black.

The next day, Balavignus voluntarily and without any coercion confirmed his previous confession word for word in front of several reputable witnesses. He admitted that, while returning one day from a place near Vivey, he had thrown a quantity of poison, wrapped in a rag, into a well below Mustruez, specifically the La Conerayde well. This poison was given to him for that purpose by Aquetus of Montreantz, a resident of that area. He informed Manssiono and his son Delosaz, who lived in Neustadt, about what he had done and warned them not to drink the water. He described the poison as being red and black.

On the nineteenth day of September, the above-named Balavignus confessed, without torture, that about three weeks after Whitsuntide, a Jew named Mussus told him that he had thrown poison into the well, in the custom-house of that place, the property of the Borneller family; and that he no longer drank the water of this well, but that of the lake.76 He further deposed that Mussus informed him that he had also laid some of the poison under the stones in the custom-house at Chillon. Search was accordingly made in this well, and the poison found: some of it was given to a Jew by way of trial, and he died in consequence. He also stated that the rabbis had ordered him and other Jews to refrain from drinking of the water for nine days after the poison was infused into it; and immediately on having poisoned the waters, he communicated the circumstance to the other Jews. He, Balavignus, confessed that about two months previously, being at Evian, he had some conversation on the subject with a Jew called Jacob, and, among other things, asked him whether he also had received writings and poison, and was answered in the affirmative; he then questioned him whether he had obeyed the command, and Jacob replied that he had not, but had given the poison to Savetus, a Jew, who had thrown it into the Well de Morer at Evian. Jacob also desired him, Balavignus, to execute the command imposed on him with due caution. He confessed that Aquetus of Montreantz had informed him that he had thrown some of the poison into the well above Tour, the water of which he sometimes drank. He confessed that Samolet had told him that he had laid the poison which he had received, in a well, which, however, he refused to name to him. Balavignus, as a physician, further deposed that a person infected by such poison coming in contact with another while in a state of perspiration, infection would be the almost inevitable result; as might also happen from the breath of an infected person. This fact he believed to be correct, and was confirmed in his opinion by the attestation of many experienced physicians. He also declared that none of his community could exculpate themselves from this accusation, as the plot was communicated to all; and that all were guilty of the above charges. Balavignus was conveyed over the lake from Chillon to Clarens, to point out the well into which he confessed having thrown the powder. On landing, he was conducted to the spot; and, having seen the well, acknowledged that to be the place, saying, “This is the well into which I put the poison.” The well was examined in his presence, and the linen cloth in which the poison had been wrapped was found in the wastepipe by a notary-public named Heinrich Gerhard, in the presence of many persons, and was shewn to the said Jew. He acknowledged this to be the linen which had contained the poison, which he described as being of two colours, red and black, but said that he had thrown it into the open well. The linen cloth was taken away and is preserved.

On September 19th, the aforementioned Balavignus confessed, without any torture, that about three weeks after Whitsuntide, a Jew named Mussus had told him that he had poisoned the well at the customs house belonging to the Borneller family, and that he no longer drank from that well, but from the lake instead.76 He further stated that Mussus had also poisoned the area under the stones in the customs house at Chillon. An investigation was conducted in the well, and poison was found there; some of it was given to a Jew as a test, and he died as a result. He also mentioned that the rabbis had instructed him and other Jews to avoid drinking the water for nine days after the poison was added; immediately after poisoning the water, he informed the other Jews. Balavignus admitted that about two months earlier, while at Evian, he had discussed the matter with a Jew named Jacob and had asked him whether he had also received writings and poison, to which Jacob replied yes; he then inquired if Jacob had followed the command, and Jacob said he had not, but had given the poison to Savetus, a Jew, who had thrown it into the Well de Morer at Evian. Jacob also suggested to Balavignus to carry out the command carefully. He confessed that Aquetus of Montreantz had told him that he had also thrown some poison into the well above Tour, whose water he sometimes drank. He admitted that Samolet had told him he had placed the poison he received in a well, which he refused to name. Balavignus, being a physician, further stated that if a person infected by such poison came into contact with another while sweating, infection was almost guaranteed; it could also happen through the breath of an infected person. He believed this to be true, supported by many experienced physicians. He declared that no one in his community could clear themselves of this accusation since the plot had been shared with everyone, implicating them all. Balavignus was taken across the lake from Chillon to Clarens to identify the well where he confessed to throwing the powder. Upon arrival, he was led to the site, and after seeing the well, he confirmed, “This is the well into which I put the poison.” The well was examined in his presence, and the linen cloth in which the poison had been wrapped was discovered in the waste pipe by a notary named Heinrich Gerhard, in front of many witnesses, and was shown to the Jew. He identified it as the linen that contained the poison, describing it as being red and black, but insisted that he threw it into the open well. The linen cloth was taken and is now preserved.

Balavignus, in conclusion, attests the truth of all and every thing as above related. He believes this poison to contain a portion of the basilisk, because he had heard, and felt assured, that the above poison could not be prepared without it.

Balavignus, in conclusion, confirms the truth of everything mentioned above. He believes this poison contains a part of the basilisk because he had heard, and felt certain, that this poison couldn’t be made without it.

77

77


II. Banditono, a Jew of Neustadt, was, on the fifteenth day of September, subjected for a short time to the torture. After a long interval, he confessed having cast a quantity of poison, about the size of a large nut, given him by Musseus, a Jew, at Tour, near Vivey, into the well of Carutet, in order to poison those who drank of it.

II. Banditono, a Jew from Neustadt, was briefly tortured on the fifteenth day of September. After a considerable time, he admitted to having thrown a quantity of poison, roughly the size of a large nut, which was given to him by Musseus, a Jew, in Tour near Vivey, into the well of Carutet, intending to poison anyone who drank from it.

The following day, Banditono, voluntarily and without torture, attested the truth of the aforesaid deposition; and also confessed that the Rabbi Jacob von Pasche, who came from Toledo and had settled at Chamberi, sent him, at Pilliex, by a Jewish servant, some poison about the size of a large nut, together with a letter directing him to throw the powder into the wells on pain of excommunication. He had therefore thrown the poison, which was sown up in a leathern bag, into the well of Cercliti de Roch; further, also, that he saw many other letters in the hands of the servant addressed to different Jews; that he had also seen the said servant deliver one, on the outside of the upper gate, to Samuletus, the Jew, at Neustadt. He stated, also, that the Jew, Massolet, had informed him that he had put poison into the well near the bridge at Vivey.

The next day, Banditono freely and without any coercion confirmed the truth of the previous statement; he also admitted that Rabbi Jacob von Pasche, who had come from Toledo and settled in Chamberi, sent him, through a Jewish servant in Pilliex, some poison about the size of a large nut, along with a letter instructing him to pour the powder into the wells or face excommunication. He had indeed poured the poison, which was sealed in a leather bag, into the well of Cercliti de Roch. He additionally mentioned that he saw many other letters in the servant's possession addressed to different Jews; he also saw the servant deliver one, at the upper gate, to Samuletus, the Jew, in Neustadt. He further stated that the Jew, Massolet, had told him that he had put poison into the well near the bridge at Vivey.


III. The said Manssiono, Jew of Neustadt, was put upon the rack on the fifteenth day of the same month, but refused to admit the above charge, protesting his entire ignorance of the whole matter; but the day following, he, voluntarily and without any torture, confessed, in the presence of many persons, that he came from Mancheolo one day in last Whitsun-week, in company with a Jew named Provenzal, and, on reaching the well of Chabloz Crüez between Vyona and Mura, the latter said, “You must put some of the poison which I will give you into that well, or woe betide you!” He therefore took a portion of the powder about the bigness of a nut, and did as he was directed. He believed that the Jews in the neighbourhood of Evian had convened a council among themselves relative to this plot, before Whitsuntide. He further said that Balavignus had informed him of his having poisoned the well de la Conerayde below Mustruez. He also affirmed his conviction of the culpability of the Jews in this affair, stating that they were fully acquainted with all the particulars, and guilty of the alleged crime.

III. The aforementioned Manssiono, a Jew from Neustadt, was put on the rack on the fifteenth day of the same month but denied the charges, claiming he knew nothing about the matter. However, the next day, he voluntarily and without any torture confessed in front of many people that he had come from Mancheolo one day during the last Whitsun week, along with a Jew named Provenzal. When they reached the well of Chabloz Crüez between Vyona and Mura, Provenzal said, “You have to put some of the poison I give you into that well, or you’ll be in trouble!” So, he took a portion of the powder about the size of a nut and did as he was told. He believed that the Jews in the Evian area had gathered to discuss this plot before Whitsun. He also mentioned that Balavignus had told him he had poisoned the well de la Conerayde below Mustruez. He firmly believed that the Jews were responsible for this and were fully aware of all the details, guilty of the alleged crime.

On the third day of the October following, Manssiono was brought before the commissioners, and did not in the least vary from his former deposition, or deny having put the poison into the said wells.

On the third day of the following October, Manssiono was brought before the commissioners and did not change his previous statement at all or deny putting the poison into those wells.

The above-named Jews, prior to their execution, solemnly swore by their Law to the truth of their several depositions, and declared that all Jews whatsoever, from seven years old and upwards, could not be exempted from the charge of guilt, as all of them were acquainted with the plot, and more or less participators in the crime.

The Jews mentioned above, before their execution, solemnly swore by their Law that their testimonies were true and stated that all Jews, from the age of seven and up, could not be exempt from guilt, as they were all aware of the plan and were either partially or fully involved in the crime.

[The seven other examinations scarcely differ from the above, except in78 the names of the accused, and afford but little variety. We will, therefore, only add a characteristic passage at the conclusion of this document. The whole speaks for itself.]

[i>The seven other examinations hardly differ from the ones mentioned above, except for the names of the accused, and offer very little variety. Therefore, we will only include a notable passage at the end of this document. The entire text speaks for itself.]

There still remain numerous proofs and accusations against the above-mentioned Jews: also against Jews and Christians in different parts of the county of Savoy, who have already received the punishment due to their heinous crime; which, however, I have not at hand, and cannot therefore send you. I must add, that all the Jews of Neustadt were burnt according to the just sentence of the law. At Augst, I was present when three Christians were flayed on account of being accessory to the plot of poisoning. Very many Christians were arrested for this crime in various places in this country, especially at Evian, Gebenne, Krusilien and Hochstett, who at last and in their dying moments were brought to confess and acknowledge that they had received the poison from the Jews. Of these Christians some have been quartered; others flayed and afterwards hanged. Certain commissioners have been appointed by the magistrates to enforce judgment against all the Jews; and I believe that none will escape.

There are still many proofs and accusations against the Jews mentioned earlier, as well as against Jews and Christians in different areas of Savoy, who have already faced punishment for their terrible crimes; however, I don't have those details on hand to share with you. I should also mention that all the Jews of Neustadt were executed as per the law's ruling. In Augst, I witnessed three Christians being flayed for being involved in the poisoning plot. Many Christians were arrested in various places across this country, especially in Evian, Gebenne, Krusilien, and Hochstett, and in their final moments, they confessed that they had received the poison from the Jews. Some of these Christians were executed by quartering, while others were flayed and then hanged. Certain commissioners have been assigned by the magistrates to carry out judgments against all the Jews, and I believe that none will escape.


FOOTNOTES:
[1] I might here enlarge on the general importance of the study of epidemics; but this has been so fully set forth in the author’s Address to the Physicians of Germany, which immediately follows, as well as in the Preface to the Sweating Sickness, at p. 177, that any further observations on this subject would be superfluous on my part.
[2] They also said that the Peloponnesians had thrown drugs into the wells. Thucyd. Hist. B. ii. 49. “The disease was attributed by the people to poison, and nothing apparently could be more authentic than the reports that were spread of miscreants taken in the act of putting poisonous drugs into the food and drink of the common people.” Observations on the Cholera in St. Petersburg, p. 9. by G. W. Lefevre, M.D. 8vo. 1831.
[3] Only two copies are known to exist, one in the British Museum, and one in the library of the College of Physicians.
[4] La Mortalega Grande. Matth. de Griffonibus. Muratori. Script. rer. Italicar. T. XVIII. p. 167. D. They were called by others Anguinalgia. Andr. Gratiol. Discorso di Peste. Venet. 1576. 4to. Swedish: Diger-döden. Loccenii Histor. Suecan. L. III. p. 104.—Danish: den sorte Dod. Pontan. Rer. Danicar. Histor. L. VIII. p. 476.—Amstelod. 1631, fol. Icelandic: Svatur Daudi. Saabye, Tagebuch in Grönland. Introduction XVIII. Mansa, de Epidemiis maxime memorabilibus, quæ in Dania grassatæ sunt, &c. Part I. p. 12. Havniæ, 1831, 8.—In Westphalia the name of de groete Doet was prevalent. Meibom.
[5] Joann. Cantacuzen. Historiar. L. IV. c. 8. Ed. Paris. p. 730. 5. The ex-emperor has indeed copied some passages from Thucydides, as Sprengel justly observes, (Appendix to the Geschichte der Medicin. Vol. I. H. I. S. 73,) though this was most probably only for the sake of rounding a period. This is no detriment to his credibility, because his statements accord with the other accounts.
[6] Great distances.
[7] Black blisters.
[8] like black marks.
[9] Guidon. de Cauliaco Chirurgia. Tract 11. c. 5. p. 113. Ed. Lugdun. 1572.
[10] Et fuit tantæ contagiositatis specialiter quæ fuit cum sputo sanguinis, quod non solum morando, sed etiam inspiciendo unus recipiebat ab alio: intantum quod gentes moriebantur sine servitoribus, et sepeliebantur sine sacerdotibus, pater non visitabat filium, nec filius patrem: charitas erat mortua, spes prostrata.
[11] Deguignes, Histoire générale des Huns, des Turcs, des Mogols, &c. Tom. IV. Paris, 1758. 4to. p. 226.
[12] Decameron. Giorn. I. Introd.
[13] From this period black petechiæ have always been considered as fatal in the plague.
[14] A very usual circumstance in plague epidemics.
[15] Auger. de Biterris, Vitæ Romanor. pontificum, Muratori Scriptor. rer. Italic. Vol. III. Pt. II. p. 556.
[16] Contin. altera Chronici Guillelmi de Nangis in d’Acher, Spicilegium sive Collectio Veterum Scriptorum, &c. Ed. de la Barre, Tom. III. p. 110.
[17] “The people all died of boils and inflamed glands which appeared under the arms and in the groins.” Jac. v. Königshoven, the oldest Chronicle of Alsace and Strasburg, and indeed of all Germany. Strasburg, 1698. 4. cap. 5, § 86. p. 301.
[18] Hainr. Rebdorff, Annales, Marq. Freher. Germanicarum rerum Scriptores. Francof. 1624. fol. p. 439.
[19] Königshoven, in loc. cit.
[20] Anonym. Leobiens. Chron. L. VI. in Hier. Pez, Scriptor. rer. Austriac. Lips. 1721. fol. Tom. I. p. 970. The above named appearances are here called, rote sprinkel, swarcze erhubenn und druesz under den üchsen und ze den gemüchten.
[21] Ubb. Emmiie rer. Frisiacar. histor. L. XIV. p. 203. Lugd. Bat. 1616. fol.
[22] Guillelmus de Nangis, loc. cit.
[23] Ant. Wood, Historia et Antiquitates Universit. Oxoniens. Oxon. 1764. fol. L. l. p. 172.
[24] Mezeray, Histoire de France. Paris, 1685. fol. T. II. p. 418.
[25] Barnes, who has given a lively picture of the black plague, in England, taken from the Registers of the 14th century, describes the external symptoms in the following terms: knobs or swellings in the groin or under the armpits, called kernels, biles, blains, blisters, pimples, wheals or plague-sores. The Hist. of Edw. III. Cambridge, 1688, fol. p. 432.
[26] Torfæus, Historia rerum Norvegicarum. Hafn. 1711. fol. L. ix. c. 8. p. 478. This author has followed Pontanus (Rerum Danicar. Historia. Amstelod. 1631. fol.) who has given only a general account of the plague in Denmark, and nothing respecting its symptoms.
[27] Dlugoss, vide Longini Histor. polonic. L. xii. Lips. 1711. fol. T. I. p. 1086.
[28] W. M. Richter, Geschichte der Medicin in Russland. Moskwa, 1813, 8. p. 215. Richter has taken his information on the black plague in Russia, from authentic Russian MSS.
[29] Compare on this point, Balling’s treatise “Zur Diagnostik der Lungenerweichung.” Vol XVI. ii. 3. p. 257 of litt. Annalen der ges. Heilkunde.
[30] It is expressly ascertained with respect to Avignon and Paris, that uncleanliness of the streets increased the plague considerably. Raim. Chalin de Vinario.
[31] De Peste Libri tres, opera Jacobi Dalechampii in lucem editi. Lugduni, 1552. 16. p. 35. Dalechamp has only improved the language of this work, adding nothing to it but a preface in the form of two letters. Raymond Chalin de Vinario was contemporary with Guy de Chauliac at Avignon. He enjoyed a high reputation, and was in very affluent circumstances. He often makes mention of cardinals and high officers of the papal court, whom he had treated; and it is even probable, though not certain, that he was physician to Clement VI. (1342–1352), Innocent VI. (1352–1362), and Urban V. (1362–1370). He and Guy de Chauliac never mention each other.
[32] Dalechamp, p. 205—where, and at pp. 32–36, the plague-eruptions are mentioned in the usual indefinite terms: Exanthemata viridia, cærulea, nigra, rubra, lata, diffusa, velut signata punctis, &c.
[33] “Pestilentis morbi gravissimum symptoma est, quod zonam vulgo nuncupant. Ea sic fit: Pustulæ nonnunquam per febres pestilentes fuscæ, nigræ, lividæ existunt, in partibus corporis a glandularum emissariis sejunctis, ut in femore, tibia, capite, brachio, humeris, quarum fervore et caliditate succi corporis attracti, glandulas in trajectione replent, et attollunt, unde bubones fiunt atque carbunculi. Ab iis tanquam solidus quidam nervus in partem vicinam distentam ac veluti convulsione rigentem producitur, puta brachium vel tibiam, nunc rubens, nunc fuscus, nunc obscurior, nunc virens, nunc iridis colore, duos vel quatuor digitos latus. Hujus summo, qua desinit in emissarium, plerumque tuberculum pestilens visitur, altero vero extremo, qua in propinquum membrum porrigitur, carbunculus. Hoc scilicet malum vulgus zonam cinctumve nominat, periculosum minus, cum hic tuberculo, illic carbunculo terminatur, quam si tuberculum in capite solum emineat.” p. 198.
[34] V. Hoff. Geschichte der natürlichen Veränderungen der Erdoberfläche, T. II. p. 264. Gotha, 1824. This eruption was not succeeded by any other in the same century, either of Etna or of Vesuvius.
[35] Deguignes, loc. cit. p. 226, from Chinese sources.
[36] Ibid. p. 225.
[37] There were also many locusts which had been blown into the sea by a hurricane, and afterwards cast dead upon the shore, and produced a noxious exhalation; and a dense and awful fog was seen in the heavens, rising in the East, and descending upon Italy. Mansfeld Chronicle, in M. Cyriac Spangenberg, chap. 287, fol. 336. b. Eisleben, 1572. Compare Staind. Chron. (?) in Schnurrer, (“Ingens vapor magnitudine horribili boreali movens, regionem, magno adspicientium terrore dilabitur,”) and Ad. von Lebenwaldt, Land-Stadt-und Hausarzney-Buch. fol. p. 15. Nuremberg, 1695, who mentions a dark, thick mist which covered the earth. Chalin expresses himself on this subject in the following terms:—“Cœlum ingravescit, aër impurus sentitur: nubes crassæ ac multæ luminibus cœli obstruunt, immundus ac ignavus tepor hominum emollit corpora, exoriens sol pallescit.” p. 50.
[38] See Caius’ account of the causes of the sweating sickness, in the Appendix.—Transl. note.
[39] Mezeray, Histoire de France, Tom. II. 418. Paris, 1685. Compare Oudegheerst’s Chroniques de Flandres. Antwerp, 1571, 4to. Chap. 175, f. 297.
[40] They spread in a direction from East to West, over most of the countries from which we have received intelligence. Anonym. Leobiens, Chron. loc. cit.
[41] Giov. Villani Istorie Fiorentine, L. XII. chap. 121, 122. in Muratori, T. XIII. pp. 1001, 1002. Compare Barnes, loc. cit. p. 430.
[42] J. Vitoduran. Chronicon, in Füssli. Thesaurus Histor. Helvet. Tigur. 1735. fol. p. 84.
[43] Albert. Argentiniens. Chronic. in Urstis. Scriptor. rer. Germanic. Francof. 1585. fol. P. II. p. 147. Compare Chalin, loc. cit.
[44] Petrarch. Opera. Basil. 1554. fol. p. 210. Barnes, loc. cit. p. 431.
[45] “Un tremblement de terre universel, mesme en France et aux pays septentrionaux, renversoit les villes toutes entières, déracinoit les arbres et les montagnes, et remplissoit les campagnes d’abysmes si profondes, qu’il semblait que l’enfer eût voulu engloutir le genre humain.” Mezeray, loc. cit. p. 418. Barnes, p. 431.
[46] Villani, loc. cit. c. 119. p. 1000.
[47] Guillelm. de Nangis, Cont. alt. Chron. loc. cit. p. 109.
[48] Ibid. p. 110.
[49] Villani, loc. cit. c. 72. p. 954.
[50] Anonym. Istorie Pistolesi, in Muratori, T. XI. p. 524. “Ne gli anni di Chr. 1346 et 1357, fu grandissima carestia in tutta la Christianità, in tanto, che molta gente moria di fame, e fu grande mortalità in ogni paese del mondo.”
[51] According to Papon, its origin is quite lost in the obscurity of remote ages; and even before the Christian Era, we are able to trace many references to former pestilences. De la peste, ou époques mémorables de ce fléau, et les moyens de s’en préserver. T. II. Paris, An VIII. de la rép. 8.
[52] 1301, in the South of France; 1311, in Italy; 1316, in Italy, Burgundy and Northern Europe; 1335, the locust year, in the middle of Europe; 1340, in Upper Italy; 1342, in France; and 1347, in Marseilles and most of the larger islands of the Mediterranean. Ibid. T. II. p. 273.
[53] Compare Deguignes, loc. cit. p. 288.
[54] According to the general Byzantine designation, “from the country of the hyperborean Scythians.” Kantakuzen, loc. cit.
[55] Guid. Cauliac, loc. cit.
[56] Matt. Villani, Istorie, in Muratori, T. XIV. p. 14.
[57] Annal. Cæsenat, Ibid. p. 1179.
[58] Barnes, loc. cit.
[59] Olof Dalin’s, Svea-Rikes Historie, III. vol. Stockholm, 1747–61, 4. Vol. II. C. 12, p. 496.
[60] Dlugoss, Histor. Polon. L. IX. p. 1086, T. I. Lips. 1711, fol.
[61] Deguignes, loc. cit. p. 223, f.
[62] Matt. Villani, Istoria, loc. cit. p. 13.
[63] Knighton, in Barnes, loc. cit. p. 434.
[64] Jno. Trithem Annal. Hirsaugiens. (Monast. St. Gall. Hirsaug. 1690. fol.) T. II. p. 296. According to Boccacio, loc. cit. 100,000; according to Matt. Villani, loc. cit. p. 14, three out of five.
[65] Odoric. Raynald. Annal. ecclesiastic. Colon. Agripp. 1691. fol. Vol. XVI. p. 280.
[66] Vitoduran. Chronic. in Füssli, loc. cit.
[67] Tromby, Storia de S. Brunone e dell’ordine Cartusiano. Vol. VI. L. VIII. p. 235. Napol. 1777. fol.
[68] Barnes, p. 435.
[69] Ibid.
[70] Baluz. Vitæ Papar. Avenionens. Paris, 1693–4. Vol. I. p. 316. According to Rebdorf in Freher. loc. cit. at the worst period, 500 daily.
[71] Königshoven, loc. cit.
[72] According to Reimar Kork, from Easter to Michaelmas 1350, 80 to 90,000; among whom were eleven members of the senate, and bishop John IV. Vid. John Rud. Becker, Circumstantial History of the Imper. and free city of Lübeck. Lübeck, 1782, 84, 1805. 3 Vols. 4. Vol. I. p. 269. 71. Although Lübeck was then in its most flourishing state, yet this account, which agrees with that of Paul Lange, is certainly exaggerated. (Chronic. Citizense, in I. Pistorius, Rerum Germanic. Scriptores aliquot insignes, cur. Struve. Ratisb. 1626. fol. p. 1214.) We have, therefore, chosen the lower estimate of an anonym. writer. Chronic. Sclavic. by Erpold Lindenbrog. Scriptores rerum Germanic. Septentrional. vicinorumque populor. diversi, Francof. 1630. fol. p. 225, and Spangenberg, loc. cit., with whom again the assurance of the two authors, that on the 10th August, 1350, 15 or 1700 (according to Becker 2500) persons had died, does not coincide. Compare Chronik des Franciskaner Lesemeisters Detmar, nach der Urschrift und mit Ergänzungen aus anderen Chroniken herausgeg. published by F. H. Grautoff. Hamburg, 1829, 30. 8. P. I. p. 269. App. 471.
[73] Förstemann, Versuch einer Geschichte der christlichen Geisslergesellschaften, in Staüdlin’s und Tzschirner’s, Archiv für alte und neue Kirchengeschichte, Vol. III. 1817.
[74] Limburg Chronicle, pub. by C. D. Vogel. Marburg, 1828. 8vo. p. 14.
[75] Barnes, loc. cit.
[76] Ibid.
[77] Spangenberg. fol. 339. a. Grawsam Sterben vieler faulen Troppfen. Many lazy monks died a cruel death.
[78] Vitoduran, loc. cit.
[79] Becker, loc. cit.
[80] Hainr. Rebdorf. p. 630.
[81] Guillelm. de Nang. loc. cit.
[82] Johanna, queen of Navarre, daughter of Louis X., and Johanna of Burgundy, wife of king Philip de Valois.
[83] Fulco de Chanac.
[84] Mich. Felibien, Histoire de la ville de Paris, Liv. XII. Vol. II. p. 601, Paris, 1725. fol. Comp. Guillelm. de Nangis. loc. cit. and Daniel, Histoire de France, Tom. II. p. 484. Amsterd. 1720. 4to.
[85] Torfæus, loc. cit.
[86] According to another account, 960. Chronic. Salisburg, in Pez. loc. cit. T. I. p. 412.
[87] According to an anonymous Chronicler, each of these pits is said to have contained 40,000; this, however, we are to understand as only in round numbers. Anonym. Leobiens, in Pez. p. 970. According to this writer, above seventy persons died in some houses, and many were entirely deserted, and at St. Stephen’s alone, fifty-four ecclesiastics were cut off.
[88] Auger. de Biterris in Muratori. Vol. III. P. II. p. 556. The same is said of Paderborn, by Gobelin Person, in Henr. Meibom. Rer. Germanic. Script. T. I. p. 286. Helmstadt, 1688. fol.
[89] Spangenberg. loc. cit. chap. 287. fol. 337. b.
[90] Barnes, 435.
[91] Trithem. Annal. Hirsaug. loc. cit.
[92] Loc. cit. L. XII. c. 99. p. 977.
[93] Chronic. Claustro-Neoburg. in Pez. Vol. I. p. 490. Comp. Barnes, p. 435. Raynald Histor. ecclesiastic, loc. cit. According to this account, a runaway Venetian is said to have brought the plague to Padua.
[94] Giov. Villani, L. XII. c. 83. p. 964.
[95] Barnes, p. 436.
[96] Wood, loc. cit.
[97] Wood says, that before the plague, there were 13,000 students at Oxford; a number which may, in some degree, enable us to form an estimate of the state of education in England at that time, if we consider that the universities were, in the middle ages, frequented by younger students, who in modern times do not quit school till their 18th year.
[98] Barnes and Wood, loc. cit.
[99] Gobelin. Person, in Meibom. loc. cit.
[100] Juan de Mariana. Historia General de España, illustrated by Don José Sabau y Blanco. Tom. IX. Madrid, 1819. 8vo. Libro XVI. p. 225. Don Diego Ortiz de Zúñiga, Annales ecclesiasticos y seculares de Sevilla. Madrid, 1795. 4to. T. II. p. 121. Don Juan de Ferreras, Historia de España. Madrid, 1721. T. VII. p. 353.
[101] Gobelin. Person, loc. cit. Comp. Chalin, p. 53.
[102] Guillelm. de Nangis, loc. cit.
[103] Spangenberg. fol. 337. b. Limburg. Chronic, p. 20. “Und die auch von Rom kamen, wurden eines Theils böser als sie vor gewesen waren.”
[104] Guillelm. de Nangis, loc. cit. and many others.
[105] Dalin’s Svea Rikes Historie, Vol. II. c. 12. p. 496.
[106] Saabye. Tagebuch in Grönland. Einleit. XVIII.—Torfæi Histor. Norveg. Tom. IV. L. IX. c. viii. p. 478–79. F. G. Mansa, De epidemiis maxime memorabilibus quæ in Dania Grassatæ sunt, et de Medicinæ statu. Partic. I. Havn. 1831. 8vo. p. 12.
[107] Torfæi Groenlandia antiqua, s. veteris Groenlandiæ; descriptio. Havniæ, 1715. 8vo. p. 23.—Pontan. Rer. danicar. Histor. Amstelod. 1631. fol. L. VII. p. 476.
[108] Richter, loc. cit.
[109] We shall take this view of the subject from Guillelm. de Nangis and Barnes, if we read them with attention. Compare Olof Dalin, loc. cit.
[110] Practica de ægritudinibus a capite usque ad pedes. Papiæ, 1486. fol. Tract VI. c. vii.
[111] “Darnach, da das Sterben, die Geiselfarth, Römerfarth, Judenschlacht, als vorgeschrieben stehet, ein End hatte, da hub die Welt wieder an zu leben und fröhlich zu seyn, und machten die Männer neue Kleidung.” Limburger Chronik. p. 26. After this, when, as was stated before, the Mortality, the Processions of the Flagellants, the Expeditions to Rome, and the Massacre of the Jews, were at an end, the world began to revive and be joyful, and the people put on new clothing.
[112] Chalin, loc. cit. p. 92. Detmar’s Lübeck Chronicle, V. I. p. 401.
[113] Chronic. Ditmari, Episcop. Mersepurg, Francof. 1580, fol. p.358.—“Spagenberg, p. 338. The lamentation was piteous; and the only remaining solace, was the prevalent anxiety, inspired by the danger, to prepare for a glorious departure; no other hope remained—death appeared inevitable. Many were hence induced to search into their own hearts, to turn to God, and to abandon their wicked courses: parents warned their children, and instructed them how to pray, and to submit to the ways of Providence: neighbours mutually admonished each other; none could reckon on a single hour’s respite. Many persons, and even young children, were seen bidding farewell to the world; some with prayer, others with praises on their lips.”
[114] Torfæi Hist. rer. Norvegic. L. IX. c. viii. p. 478. (Havn. 1711, fol.) Die Cronica van der hilliger Stat van Coellen, off dat tzytboich, Coellen, 1490, fol. p. 263. “In dem vurss jair erhoiff sich eyn alzo wunderlich nuwe Geselschaft in Ungarien,” &c. The Chronicle of the holy city of Cologne, 1499. In this same year, a very remarkable society was formed in Hungary.
[115] Albert. Argentinens. Chronic. p. 149, in Chr. Urstisius. Germaniæ historicorum illustrium Tomus unus. Francof. 1585, fol.—Guillelm. de Nang. loc. cit.—Comp. also the Saxon Chronicle, by Mattheus Dresseren, Physician and Professor at Leipsig, Wittenberg, 1596, fol. p. 340; the above-named Limburg Chronicle, and the Germaniæ Chronicon, on the origin, name, commerce, &c., of all the Teutonic nations of Germany: by Seb. Francken, of Wörd. Tübingen, 1534, fol. p. 201.
[116] Ditmar, loc. cit.
[117] Königshoven, Elsassische und Strassburgische Chronicke. loc. cit. p. 297. f.
[118] Albert. Argentin. loc. cit. They never remained longer than one night at any place.
[119] Words of Monachus Paduanus, quoted in Förstemann’s Treatise, which is the best upon this subject.—See p. 24.
[120] Schnurrer, Chronicle of the Plagues, T. I. p. 291.
[121] Königshoven, loc. cit.
[122] Förstemann, loc. cit. The pilgrimages of the Flagellants of the year 1349, were not the last. Later in the 14th century this fanaticism still manifested itself several times, though never to so great an extent: in the 15th century, it was deemed necessary, in several parts of Germany, to extirpate them by fire and sword; and in the year 1710, processions of the Cross-bearers were still seen in Italy. How deeply this mania had taken root, is proved by the deposition of a citizen of Nordhäusen (1446): that his wife, in the belief of performing a Christian act, wanted to scourge her children, as soon as they were baptized.
[123] Königshoven, p. 298:
Stant uf durch der reinen Martel ere;
Und hüte dich vor der Sünden mere.
[124] Guill. de Nang. loc. cit.
[125] Albert. Argentinens. loc. cit.
[126] We meet with fragments of different lengths in the Chronicles of the times, but the only entire MS. which we possess, is in the valuable Library of President von Meusebach. Massmann has had this printed, accompanied by a translation, entitled Erläuterungen zum Wessobrunner Gebet des 8ten Jahrhunderts. Nebst Zweien noch ungedruckten, Poems of the Fourteenth Century, Berlin, 1824. “Elucidations of the Wessobrunn Prayer of the 8th century, together with two unpublished Hymns the 14th century.” We shall subjoin it at the end of this Treatise, as a striking document of the age. The Limburg Chronicle asserts, indeed, that it was not composed till that time, although a part, if not the whole, of it, was sung in the procession of the Flagellants, in 1260.—See Incerti auctoris Chronicon rerum per Austriam Vicinasque regiones gestarum inde ab anno 1025, usque ad annum 1282. Munich, 1827 8, p. 9.
[127] Trithem. Annal. Hirsaugiens, T. II. p. 206.
[128] He issued a bull against them, Oct. 20, 1349. Raynald. Trithem. loc. cit.
[129] But as they at last ceased to excite astonishment, were no longer welcomed by the ringing of bells, and were not received with veneration, as before, they vanished as human imaginations are wont to do. Saxon Chronicle, by Matt. Dresseren. Wittenberg, 1596, fol. p. 340, 341.
[130] Albert. Argentinens. loc. cit.
[131] Guillelm. de Nangis.
[132] Ditmar. loc. cit.
[133] Klose of Breslaw’s Documental History and Description, 8vo. Vol. II. p. 190. Breslaw, 1781.
[134] Limburg Chronicle, p. 17.
[135] Kehrberg’s Description of Königsberg, i. e. Neumark, 1724, 4to. p. 240.
[136] So says the Polish historian Dlugoss, loc. cit., while most of his contemporaries mention only the poisoning of the wells. It is evident, that in the state of their feelings, it mattered little whether they added another still more formidable accusation.
[137] In those places where no Jews resided, as in Leipsig, Magdeburg, Brieg, Frankenstein, &c., the grave-diggers were accused of the crime.—V. Möhsen’s History of the Sciences in the March of Brandenburg, T. II. p. 265.
[138] See the original proceedings, in the Appendix.
[139] Hermanni Gygantis Flores temporum, sive Chronicon Universale—Ed. Meuschen. Lugdun. Bat. 1743. 4to. p. 139. Hermann, a Franciscan monk of Franconia, who wrote in the year 1349, was an eye-witness of the most revolting scenes of vengeance, throughout all Germany.
[140] Guid. Cauliac. loc. cit.
[141] Hermann. loc. cit.
[142] Albert. Argentin.Königshoven, loc. cit.
[143] Dies was ouch die Vergift, die die Juden döttete. “This was also the poison that killed the Jews,” observes Königshoven, which he illustrates by saying, that their increase in Germany was very great, and their mode of gaining a livelihood, which, however, was the only resource left them, had engendered ill-will against them in all quarters.
[144] Many wealthy Jews, for example, were, on their way to the stake, stripped of their garments, for the sake of the gold coin that was sewed in them.—Albert. Argentinens.
[145] Vide preceding note.
[146] Spangenberg, loc. cit.
[147] Guillelm. de Nangis.Dlugoss, loc. cit.
[148] Albert. Argentinens.
[149] Spangenberg describes a similar scene which took place at Kostnitz.
[150] Guillelm. de Nang.—Raynald.
[151] Histor. Landgrav. Thuring. in Pistor. loc. cit. Vol. I. p. 948.
[152] Anonym. Leobiens, in Pez. loc. cit.
[153] Spangenberg. In the county of Mark, the Jews were no better off than in the rest of Germany. Margrave Ludwig, the Roman, even countenanced their persecutions, of which Kehrberg, loc. cit. 241. gives the following official account: Coram cunctis Christi fidelibus præsentia percepturis, ego Johannes dictus de Wedel Advocatus, inclyti Principis Domini, Ludovici, Marchionis, publice profiteor et recognosco, quod nomine Domini mei civitatem Königsberg visitavi et intravi, et ex parte Domini Marchionis Consulibus ejusdem civitatis in adjutorium mihi assumtis, Judæos inibi morantes igne cremavi, bonaque omnia eorundem Judæorum ex parte Domini mei totaliter usurpavi et assumsi. In cujus testimonium præsentibus meum sigillum appendi. Datum A.D. 1351. in Vigilia S. Matthæi Apostoli.
[154] Basnage, Histoire des Juifs. A la Haye, 1716. 8vo. T. IX. Part 2. Liv. IX. Chap. 23. §. 12. 24. pp. 664. 679. This valuable work gives an interesting account of the state of the Jews of the middle ages. Compare J. M. Jost’s History of the Israelites from the time of the Maccabees to the present day. T. VII. Berlin, 1827. 8vo. pp. 8. 262.
[155] Albert. Argentinens.
[156] Hermann. Gygas. loc. cit.
[157] On this subject see Königshoven, who has preserved some very valuable original proceedings. The most important are, the criminal examinations of ten Jews, at Chillon, on the Lake of Geneva, held in September and October, 1348.—V. Appendix. They produced the most strange confessions, and sanctioned, by the false name of justice, the blood-thirsty fanaticism which lighted the funeral piles. Copies of these proceedings were sent to Bern and Strasburg, where they gave rise to the first persecutions against the Jews.—V. also the original document of the offensive and defensive Alliance between Berthold von Götz, Bishop of Strasburg, and many powerful lords and nobles, in favour of the city of Strasburg, against Charles IV. The latter saw himself compelled, in consequence, to grant to that city an amnesty for the Jewish persecutions, which in our days would be deemed disgraceful to an imperial crown. Not to mention many other documents, which no less clearly shew the spirit of the 14th century, p. 1021. f.
[158] Guillelm. de Nangis, p. 110.
[159] “Curationem omnem respuit pestis confirmata.”—Chalin, p. 33.
[160] Jacob. Francischini de Ambrosiis. In the Appendix to the Istorie Pistolesi, in Muratori, Tom. XI. p. 528.
[161] Gentilis de Fulgineo Consilia. De Peste Cons. I. II. fol. 76, 77. Venet. 1514. fol.
[162] —“venenosa putredo circa partes cordis et pulmonis de quibus exeunte venenoso vapore, periculum est in vicinitatibus.” Cons. I. fol. 76, a.
[163] Dr. Maclean’s notion that the doctrine of contagion was first promulgated in the year 1547, by Pope Paul III., &c., thus falls to the ground, together with all the arguments founded on it.—See Maclean on Epid. and Pestilent. Diseases, 8vo, 1817, Pt. II. Book II. ch. 3, 4.—Transl. note.
[164] Lippitudo contagione spectantium oculos afficit.—Chalin de Vinario, p. 149.
[165] See the Author’s Geschichte der Heilkunde, Vol. II. P. III.
[166] Compare Marx, Origines contagii. Caroliruh. et Bad. 1824. 8.
[167] Cæl. Aurelian. Chron. L. IV. c. 1. p. 497. Ed. Amman. “Sed hi ægrotantem destituendum magis imperant, quam curandum, quod a se alienum humanitas approbat medicinæ.”
[168] Geschichte der Heilkunde, Vol. II. p. 248.
[169] Chalin assures us expressly, that many nunneries, by closing their gates, remained free from the contagion. It is worthy of note, and quite in conformity with the prevailing notions, that the continuance in a thick, moist atmosphere, was generally esteemed more advantageous and conservative, on account of its being more impenetrable to the astral influence, inasmuch as the inferior cause kept off the superior.—Chalin, p. 48.
[170] This was called Affluxus, or Forma specifica, and was compared to the effect of a magnet on iron, and of amber on chaff.—Chalin de Vinario, p. 23.
[171] Causa universalis agens—causa particularis patiens. To this correspond, in Chalin, the expressions Causa superior et inferior.
[172] Purging with alöetic pills; bleeding; purification of the air by means of large fires; the use of treacle; frequent smelling to volatile substances, of which certain “poma,” were prepared; the internal use of Armenian bole,—a plague-remedy derived from the Arabians, and, throughout the middle ages, much in vogue, and very improperly used; and the employment of acescent food, in order to resist putridity. Guy de Chauliac appears to have recommended flight to many. Loc. citat. p. 115. Compare Chalin, L. II., who gives most excellent precepts on this subject.
[173] Auger. de Biterris, loc. cit.
[174] L. I. c. 4. p. 39.
[175] Fol. 32. loc. cit.
[176] Galeacii de Sancta Sophia, Liber de Febribus. Venet. 1514, fol. (Printed together with Guillelmus Brixiensis, Marsilius de Sancta Sophia, Ricardus Parisiensis. fol. 29. seq.)
[177] Warmth, cold, dryness and moisture.
[178] The talented Chalin entertains the same conviction, “Obscurum interdum esse vitium aëris, sub pestis initia et menses primos, hoc est argumento: quod cum nec odore tetro gravis, nec turpi colore fœdatus fuerit, sed purus, tenuis, frigidus, qualis in montosis et asperis locis esse solet, et tranquillus, vehementissima sit tamen pestilentia infestaque,” etc. p. 28. The most recent observers of malaria have stated nothing more than this.
[179] Compare Enr. di Wolmar, Abhandlung über die Pest. Berlin, 1827. 8vo.
[180] Tractatus de Febribus, fol. 48.
[181] De Peste Liber, pura latinitate donatus a Jacobo Dalechampio. Lugdun. 1552. 16. p. 40. 188. “Longe tamen plurimi congressu eorum qui fuerunt in locis pestilentibus periclitantur et gravissime, quoniam e causa duplici, nempe et aëris vitio, et eorum qui versantur nobiscum, vitio. Hoc itaque modo fit, ut unius accessu in totam modo familiam, modo civitatem, modo villam, pestis invehatur.” Compare p. 20, “Solæ privatorum ædes pestem sentiunt, si adeat qui in pestilenti loco versatus est.”—“Nobis proximi ipsi sumus, nemoque est tanta occœcatus amentia, qui de sua salute potius quam aliorum sollicitus non sit, maxime in contagione tam cita et rapida.” Rather a loose principle, which might greatly encourage low sentiments, and much endanger the honour of the medical profession, but which, in Chalin, who was aware of the impossibility of avoiding contagion in uncleanly dwellings, is so far excusable, that he did not apply it to himself.
[182] Morbos omnes pestilentes esse contagiosos, audacter ego equidem pronuntio et assevero. p. 149.
[183] Vide preceding note, pp. 162, 163.
[184] Ibid. p. 97. 166. “Qualis (vita) esse solet eorum, qui sacerdotiorum et cultus divini prætextu, genio plus satis indulgent et obsequuntur, ac Christum speciosis titulis ementientes, Epicurum imitantur.” Certainly a remarkable freedom of sentiment for the 14th century.
[185] Ibid. p. 183. 151.
[186] Ibid. p. 159. 189.
[187] Canonica de Febribus, ad Raynerium Siculum, 1487, s. 1. cap. 10, sine pag. “Febris pestilentialis est febris contagiosa ex ebullitione putrefactiva in altero quatuor humorum cordi propinquorum principaliter.”
[188] Valesci de Tharanta, Philonium. Lugduni, 1535. 8. L. VII. c. 18. fol. 401. b. seq.—Compare Astruc. Mémoires pour servir à l’Histoire de la Faculté de Médecine de Montpellier. Paris, 1767. 4. p. 208.
[189] Chronicon Regiense, Muratori, Tom. XVIII. p. 82.
[190] Adr. Chenot, Hinterlassene Abhandlungen über die ärztlichen und politischen Anstalten bei der Pestseuche. Wien, 1798, 8vo. p. 146. From this period it was common in the middle ages to barricade the doors and windows of houses infected with plague, and to suffer the inhabitants to perish without mercy.—S. Möhsen, loc. cit.
[191] Chron. Reg. loc. cit.
[192] Muratori, Tom. XVI. p. 560.—Compare Chenot, loc. cit. p. 146.
[193] Papon, loc. cit.
[194] Chenot, p. 145.
[195] Le Bret, Staatsgeschichte der Republik Venedig. Riga, 1775. 4, Part II. Div. 2. p. 752.
[196] Zagata, Cronica di Verona, 1744. 4, III. p. 93.
[197] Le Bret, loc. cit. Compare Hamburger Remarquen of the year 1700, pp. 282 and 305.
[198] Göttinger gelehrte Anzeigen, 1772, p. 22.
[199] The forty days’ duration of the Flood, the forty days’ sojourn of Moses on Mount Sinai, our Saviour’s fast for the same length of time in the wilderness; lastly, what is called the Saxon term (Sächsische Frist,) which lasts for forty days, &c. Compare G. W. Wedel, Centuria Exercitationum Medico-philologicarum. De Quadragesima Medica. Jenæ, 1701. 4. Dec. IV. p. 16.
[200] We hence perceive with what feelings subterraneous thunders were regarded by the people.
[201] For the sake of thy Trinity.
[202] An appearance of justice having been given to all later persecutions by these proceedings, they deserve to be recorded as important historical documents. The original is in Latin, but we have preferred the German translation in Königshoven’s Chronicle, p. 1029.

79

79

THE DANCING MANIA.


81

TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE.


Dr. Hecker’s account of the “Black Death” having, in its English translation, met with a favourable reception, I am led to believe that the “Dancing Mania,” a similar production by the same able writer, will also prove acceptable. Should this be the case, it is my intention to complete the series by translating the history of the “Sweating Sickness,” the only remaining epidemic considered by our author to belong to the Middle Ages.

Dr. Hecker’s account of the “Black Death” received a positive response in its English translation, so I believe that the “Dancing Mania,” another work by this talented author, will also be well-received. If that happens, I plan to round out the series by translating the history of the “Sweating Sickness,” the only other epidemic that our author considers to be part of the Middle Ages.

The mind and the body reciprocally and mysteriously affect each other, and the maladies which are the subject of these pages, are so intimately connected with the disordered state of both, that it is often difficult to determine on which they more essentially depend, or which they more seriously influence.

The mind and body influence each other in complex and mysterious ways, and the illnesses discussed in this text are so closely linked to the disturbed state of both that it can be hard to figure out which one they depend on more or which one they impact more seriously.

The physician will probably be led by their contemplation to admit that the imagination has a larger share in the production of disease than he might, without a knowledge of the striking facts here recorded, have supposed to be within the limits of possibility. He has, no doubt, already observed, that joy will affect the circulation, grief the digestion; that anger will heat the frame as perniciously as ardent spirits, and that fear will chill it as certainly as ice; but he may not have carried his observation to the extent of perceiving, that not only single and transient effects, but specific diseases are produced through the agency of mental impressions, and he may therefore still be surprised to find that the dances of St. John and of St. Vitus, as they formerly spread by sympathy from city to city, gave rise to the same deviations from bodily health, in all the individuals whom they attacked; that Tarantism was the same disease, whether medically or morally considered, all over Italy; and that the “Lycanthropia,” of the past, and the82 “Leaping Ague” of the present times, have each its respective train of peculiar symptoms.

The doctor will likely come to realize that the imagination plays a bigger role in causing disease than they might have thought without being aware of the remarkable facts noted here. They have probably noticed already that joy can affect circulation, grief impacts digestion, anger can heat the body as harmfully as strong alcohol, and fear can chill it just as effectively as ice. However, they may not have observed that not only short-term effects but also specific diseases can arise from mental impressions. This might lead to surprise at the way the dances of St. John and St. Vitus historically spread from city to city, causing the same health issues in all those they affected. They might also find it interesting that Tarantism was the same condition, whether looked at medically or morally, all across Italy, and that the “Lycanthropia” of the past and the “Leaping Ague” of today each have their own unique set of symptoms.

The moralist will view these records of human frailty in a different light; he will examine the state of society which favoured the propagation of such maladies; he will inquire how far they have been the offspring of the ages in which they appeared, and although he may not be disposed to think with our author, that they can never return, he will at least deduce from the facts here laid before him, that they originate in those minds, whether ignorant or ill-educated, in which the imagination is permitted to usurp the power of sober sense, and the ideal is allowed to occupy the thoughts to the exclusion of the substantial.

The moralist will see these records of human weakness in a different way; he will look into the state of society that allowed such issues to spread; he will question how much they stem from the times they emerged in, and while he might not agree with our author that they can never come back, he will at least conclude from the facts presented to him that they arise from those minds, whether uneducated or poorly educated, where the imagination is allowed to take over from rational thinking, and the ideal is allowed to overshadow the real.

That such minds are most frequently to be met with in an age of ignorance, we should naturally suppose, and we are borne out in that supposition by the fact, that these diseases have been declining in proportion to the advance of knowledge; but credulity and enthusiasm are not incompatible with a high degree of civilization: and if, among the educated classes, the female sex is more sentimental than the male, and the affluent are more credulous than those who are dependent on their own exertions for their support, it is to be accounted for by the fact, that they usually devote more leisure to the pleasurable contemplation of works of imagination, and are less imperatively called on to improve their judgment by the dry study of facts, and the experience acquired in the serious business of life. But there is no class, even in this age of boasted reason, wholly exempt from the baneful influence of fanaticism; and instances are not wanting, in our own days, and in this very capital, to prove, that disorders (how can we more charitably designate them?) much resembling some of those described in the following pages, may make their appearance among people who have had all the advantages of an enlightened education, and every opportunity of enlarging their minds by a free intercourse with refined society.

That we often find such minds in a time of ignorance is something we would naturally expect, and this idea is supported by the fact that these issues have been decreasing as knowledge advances. However, gullibility and enthusiasm can exist alongside a high level of civilization. If, in educated circles, women tend to be more sentimental than men, and wealthy individuals are more gullible than those who rely on their own efforts for support, it can be explained by the tendency of these groups to spend more leisure time enjoying works of imagination, while they face less pressure to sharpen their judgment through the dry study of facts and the experiences gained from the serious tasks of life. Yet, no social class, even in this age that prides itself on reason, is completely free from the harmful effects of fanaticism. There are examples in our own time, right here in this very city, that show disorders (how else can we kindly describe them?) resembling those discussed in the following pages can arise among people who have had all the benefits of a good education and ample opportunities to expand their minds through interactions with cultured society.

I thus venture to hope, that by bestowing a leisure hour on this small portion of medical history, the physician may enlarge his knowledge of disease, and the moralist may gather a hint for the intellectual improvement of his fellow-men. The author has, however, a more extended object in view—the histories of particular epidemics are with him but the data from which we83 are to deduce the general laws that govern human health in the aggregate. Whether there be such an entity as collective organic life, and whether, as a consequence, there exist general laws which regulate its healthy or morbid condition, I do not here undertake to determine; but the notion is peculiar, and in order that it may be more fully exposed to the reader, I have translated as an introduction to the present volume[1], an Appeal which Dr. Hecker has made to the medical profession of his own country for assistance in his undertaking. If, in the course of the remarks contained in this address, he has been somewhat severe in his censure of the neglect, both in this country and in France, of the study of Medical History, I freely confess myself to be one of those who are more anxious to profit by his castigation than to dispute its justice.

I hope that by spending some free time on this small part of medical history, doctors can expand their understanding of diseases, and moralists might find inspiration for improving the intellect of their fellow humans. However, the author has a broader goal in mind—the histories of specific epidemics are just the data from which we83 can draw general principles that govern human health overall. Whether there exists something like a collective organic life, and whether there are general laws that regulate its healthy or unhealthy states, I won’t decide here; but the idea is intriguing. To elaborate on this for the reader, I have included as an introduction to this volume[1]an appeal that Dr. Hecker made to the medical community in his country for support in his work. If, in his address, he has been a bit harsh in criticizing the neglect of Medical History studies, both here and in France, I openly admit that I am one of those who is more eager to learn from his criticism than to argue against its validity.

I have added a few Notes, which I trust will be found not inapplicable. They consist chiefly of parallel accounts in illustration of what is set forth in the text; and with the same view, I have thrown together in No. V. of the Appendix, some Histories of Local Epidemics, and have referred to some single cases, which seem to me to have a peculiar interest in connexion with the subject of this work, and to render it, on the whole, more complete.

I’ve included some notes that I hope you’ll find relevant. They mainly consist of similar accounts to help illustrate what’s discussed in the text. Additionally, in No. V of the Appendix, I’ve compiled some stories of local epidemics and referenced a few individual cases that I think are particularly interesting in relation to this subject. Overall, I believe this makes the work more complete.


85

PREFACE.


The diseases which form the subject of the present investigation afford a deep insight into the workings of the human mind in a state of society. They are a portion of history, and will never return in the form in which they are there recorded; but they expose a vulnerable part of man—the instinct of imitation—and are therefore very nearly connected with human life in the aggregate. It appeared worth while to describe diseases which are propagated on the beams of light—on the wings of thought; which convulse the mind by the excitement of the senses, and wonderfully affect the nerves, the media of its will and of its feelings. It seemed worth while to attempt to place these disorders between the epidemics of a less refined origin, which affect the body more than the soul, and all those passions and emotions which border on the vast domain of disease, ready at every moment to pass the boundary. Should we be able to deduce from the grave facts of history here developed, a convincing proof that the human race, amidst the creation which surrounds it, moves in body and soul as an individual whole, the Author might hope that he had approached nearer to his ideal of a grand comprehension of diseases in time and space, and be encouraged, by the co-operation of contemporaries, zealous in the search of truth, to proceed along the path which he has already entered, in prosecuting the investigation.

The diseases discussed in this investigation provide a deep understanding of how the human mind works within a society. They are part of history and will never be experienced again in the way they are documented; however, they reveal a vulnerable aspect of humanity—the instinct to imitate—and are closely linked to human life as a whole. It seemed worthwhile to describe diseases that spread through ideas and inspire action, which disturb the mind through sensory excitement and significantly impact the nerves, the channels of will and emotion. It also seemed important to position these disorders between epidemics of a simpler origin that affect the body more than the spirit and the many passions and feelings that hover on the edge of disease, ready to cross the line at any moment. If we can derive convincing evidence from the serious facts of history presented here, showing that humanity, amidst its surroundings, operates as a single entity in body and soul, the Author might hope to be closer to realizing his vision of comprehending diseases across time and space, and feel encouraged by the collaboration of contemporaries dedicated to the pursuit of truth to continue along the path he has begun in this investigation.


87

87

THE DANCING MANIA.

CHAPTER I.
THE DANCING MANIA IN GERMANY AND THE NETHERLANDS.

Sect. 1.—St. John’s Dance.

The effects of the Black Death had not yet subsided, and the graves of millions of its victims were scarcely closed, when a strange delusion arose in Germany, which took possession of the minds of men, and, in spite of the divinity of our nature, hurried away body and soul into the magic circle of hellish superstition. It was a convulsion which in the most extraordinary manner infuriated the human frame, and excited the astonishment of contemporaries for more than two centuries, since which time it has never reappeared. It was called the dance of St. John or of St. Vitus, on account of the Bacchantic leaps by which it was characterized, and which gave to those affected, whilst performing their wild dance, and screaming and foaming with fury, all the appearance of persons possessed. It did not remain confined to particular localities, but was propagated by the sight of the sufferers, like a demoniacal epidemic, over the whole of Germany and the neighbouring countries to the north-west, which were already prepared for its reception by the prevailing opinions of the times.

The effects of the Black Death had not yet faded, and the graves of millions of its victims were barely closed when a strange delusion emerged in Germany, gripping people's minds and, despite the divinity of our nature, dragging them body and soul into the spell of hellish superstition. It was a disruption that, in an extraordinary way, drove the human body to madness and astounded contemporaries for over two centuries, after which it never reappeared. It was known as the dance of St. John or of St. Vitus, named for the frenzied leaps that characterized it, making those affected seem like they were possessed as they danced wildly, screamed, and foamed at the mouth. This phenomenon was not limited to specific areas but spread like a demonic epidemic throughout Germany and nearby countries to the northwest, which were already primed for its arrival by the prevailing beliefs of the time.

So early as the year 1374, assemblages of men and women were seen at Aix-la-Chapelle who had come out of Germany, and who, united by one common delusion, exhibited to the public both in the streets and in the churches the following strange spectacle[2]. They formed circles hand in hand, and appearing to have lost all control over their senses, continued dancing, regardless of the bystanders, for hours together, in wild 88delirium, until at length they fell to the ground in a state of exhaustion. They then complained of extreme oppression, and groaned as if in the agonies of death, until they were swathed in cloths bound tightly round their waists, upon which they again recovered, and remained free from complaint until the next attack. This practice of swathing was resorted to on account of the tympany which followed these spasmodic ravings, but the bystanders frequently relieved patients in a less artificial manner, by thumping and trampling upon the parts affected. While dancing they neither saw nor heard, being insensible to external impressions through the senses, but were haunted by visions, their fancies conjuring up spirits whose names[3] they shrieked out; and some of them afterwards asserted that they felt as if they had been immersed in a stream of blood, which obliged them to leap so high[4]. Others, during the paroxysm, saw the heavens open and the Saviour enthroned with the Virgin Mary, according as the religious notions of the age were strangely and variously reflected in their imaginations[5].

As early as 1374, groups of men and women gathered in Aix-la-Chapelle, having come from Germany, united by a shared delusion. They put on a bizarre display for the public in the streets and churches. They formed circles, holding hands, and seemed to have lost all control over their senses, dancing for hours in wild delirium, completely oblivious to onlookers, until they eventually collapsed from exhaustion. Afterwards, they complained of severe pressure and groaned as if in extreme pain until they were tightly wrapped in cloths around their waists. This helped them recover, and they remained symptom-free until the next episode. The wrapping was used due to the bloating that followed these fits, but bystanders often assisted the affected individuals in less conventional ways, like thumping and stomping on the affected areas. While dancing, they didn't see or hear anything, being completely unresponsive to external stimuli, but they were plagued by visions, conjuring up spirits whose names they screamed out. Some claimed they felt as if they had been submerged in a stream of blood, compelling them to jump high. Others, during these episodes, reported seeing the heavens opened and the Savior sitting with the Virgin Mary, reflecting the strange and varied religious beliefs of the time.

Where the disease was completely developed, the attack commenced with epileptic convulsions[6]. Those affected fell to the ground senseless, panting and labouring for breath. They foamed at the mouth, and suddenly springing up began their dance amidst strange contortions. Yet the malady doubtless made its appearance very variously, and was modified by temporary or local circumstances, whereof non-medical contemporaries but imperfectly noted the essential particulars, accustomed as they were to confound their observation of natural events with their notions of the world of spirits.

Where the disease was fully developed, the attack began with epileptic seizures[6]. Those affected collapsed to the ground, unconscious, struggling to breathe. They foamed at the mouth, and suddenly leaping up started to dance with unusual movements. However, the illness likely presented itself in many different ways and was influenced by temporary or local factors, which non-medical observers only partially noted, as they were used to mixing their observations of natural events with their beliefs about the spirit world.

It was but a few months ere this demoniacal disease had spread from Aix-la-Chapelle, where it appeared in July, over the 89neighbouring Netherlands[7]. In Liege, Utrecht, Tongres, and many other towns of Belgium, the dancers appeared with garlands in their hair, and their waists girt with cloths, that they might, as soon as the paroxysm was over, receive immediate relief on the attack of the tympany. This bandage was, by the insertion of a stick, easily twisted tight: many, however, obtained more relief from kicks and blows, which they found numbers of persons ready to administer; for, wherever the dancers appeared, the people assembled in crowds to gratify their curiosity with the frightful spectacle. At length the increasing number of the affected excited no less anxiety than the attention that was paid to them. In towns and villages they took possession of the religious houses, processions were everywhere instituted on their account, and masses were said and hymns were sung, while the disease itself, of the demoniacal origin of which no one entertained the least doubt, excited everywhere astonishment and horror. In Liege the priests had recourse to exorcisms, and endeavoured, by every means in their power, to allay an evil which threatened so much danger to themselves; for the possessed assembling in multitudes, frequently poured forth imprecations against them, and menaced their destruction. They intimidated the people also to such a degree that there was an express ordinance issued that no one should make any but square-toed shoes, because these fanatics had manifested a morbid dislike to the pointed shoes which had come into fashion immediately after the Great Mortality in 1350[8]. They were still more irritated at the sight of red colours, the influence of which on the disordered nerves might lead us to imagine an extraordinary accordance 90between this spasmodic malady and the condition of infuriated animals; but in the St. John’s dancers this excitement was probably connected with apparitions consequent upon their convulsions. There were likewise some of them who were unable to endure the sight of persons weeping[9]. The clergy seemed to become daily more and more confirmed in their belief that those who were affected were a kind of sectarians, and on this account they hastened their exorcisms as much as possible, in order that the evil might not spread amongst the higher classes, for hitherto scarcely any but the poor had been attacked, and the few people of respectability among the laity and clergy who were to be found among them, were persons whose natural frivolity was unable to withstand the excitement of novelty, even though it proceeded from a demoniacal influence. Some of the affected had indeed themselves declared, when under the influence of priestly forms of exorcism, that if the demons had been allowed only a few weeks more time, they would have entered the bodies of the nobility and princes, and through these have destroyed the clergy. Assertions of this sort, which those possessed uttered whilst in a state which may be compared with that of magnetic sleep, obtained general belief, and passed from mouth to mouth with wonderful additions. The priesthood were, on this account, so much the more zealous in their endeavours to anticipate every dangerous excitement of the people, as if the existing order of things could have been seriously threatened by such incoherent ravings. Their exertions were effectual, for exorcism was a powerful remedy in the fourteenth century; or it might perhaps be that this wild infatuation terminated in consequence of the exhaustion which naturally ensued from it; at all events, in the course of ten or eleven months the St. John’s dancers were no longer to be found in any of the cities of Belgium. The evil, however, was too deeply rooted to give way altogether to such feeble attacks[10].

It was only a few months before this horrifying illness spread from Aix-la-Chapelle, where it first appeared in July, over the neighboring Netherlands. In Liege, Utrecht, Tongres, and many other towns in Belgium, dancers showed up with garlands in their hair and cloths tied around their waists so they could quickly relieve themselves after a fit hit. This cloth could be tightened easily with a stick, but many found that kicks and blows provided more relief, offered by the numerous spectators gathered to witness the unsettling spectacle. Eventually, the growing number of affected individuals caused as much worry as the attention given to them. In towns and villages, they took over religious houses, and processions were organized everywhere for their sake, with masses said and hymns sung, while the disease itself, believed by all to be demonic in origin, sparked astonishment and horror everywhere. In Liege, priests turned to exorcisms and tried every means possible to mitigate an evil that posed significant danger to themselves; the possessed would often gather in droves, hurling curses at them and threatening their destruction. They terrified the public to such an extent that a specific order was issued stating that only square-toed shoes could be made, as these fanatics displayed an extreme aversion to the pointed shoes that had become popular right after the Great Mortality in 1350. They were even more disturbed by the sight of red colors, which seemed to aggravate their troubled nerves, suggesting a strange connection between this convulsive illness and the behavior of enraged animals; but in the St. John's dancers, this agitation was likely tied to visions resulting from their convulsions. Some of them could not tolerate seeing anyone cry. The clergy increasingly believed that the affected were a kind of sect, prompting them to hasten their exorcisms to prevent the evil from spreading to the upper classes, as until then, only the poor had been impacted. The few respectable individuals among the laity and clergy who were found in their midst were those whose natural lightheartedness couldn’t resist the excitement of something new, even if it stemmed from a demonic influence. Indeed, some of the affected declared while under the influence of the priests' exorcisms that if the demons had been given just a few more weeks, they would have possessed the bodies of the nobility and princes, which would have led to the destruction of the clergy. Such claims, made by those possessed during a state akin to magnetic sleep, gained widespread belief and spread rapidly, becoming embellished along the way. Because of this, the priesthood became even more zealous in their efforts to curb any dangerous excitement among the populace, as if the current order could be genuinely threatened by such nonsensical utterances. Their efforts were effective, for exorcism was a strong remedy in the fourteenth century; or perhaps this wild obsession faded due to the exhaustion that followed it. In any case, within ten or eleven months, the St. John's dancers had disappeared from all the cities of Belgium. However, the underlying issue was too deeply rooted to be entirely eliminated by such weak efforts.

A few months after this dancing malady had made its appearance at Aix-la-Chapelle, it broke out at Cologne, where the number of those possessed amounted to more than five hundred[11], 91and about the same time at Metz, the streets of which place are said to have been filled with eleven hundred dancers[12]. Peasants left their ploughs, mechanics their workshops, housewives their domestic duties, to join the wild revels, and this rich commercial city became the scene of the most ruinous disorder. Secret desires were excited, and but too often found opportunities for wild enjoyment; and numerous beggars, stimulated by vice and misery, availed themselves of this new complaint to gain a temporary livelihood. Girls and boys quitted their parents, and servants their masters, to amuse themselves at the dances of those possessed, and greedily imbibed the poison of mental infection. Above a hundred unmarried women were seen raving about in consecrated and unconsecrated places, and the consequences were soon perceived[13]. Gangs of idle vagabonds, who understood how to imitate to the life the gestures and convulsions of those really affected, roved from place to place seeking maintenance and adventures, and thus, wherever they went, spreading this disgusting spasmodic disease like a plague; for in maladies of this kind the susceptible are infected as easily by the appearance as by the reality. At last it was found necessary to drive away these mischievous guests, who were equally inaccessible to the exorcisms of the priests and the remedies of the physicians. It was not, however, until after four months that the Rhenish cities were able to suppress these impostures, which had so alarmingly increased the original evil. In the mean time, when once called into existence, the plague crept on, and found abundant food in the tone of thought which prevailed in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, and even, though in a minor degree, throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth, causing a permanent disorder of the mind, and exhibiting, in those cities to whose inhabitants it was a novelty, scenes as strange as they were detestable.

A few months after this dancing sickness first appeared in Aix-la-Chapelle, it broke out in Cologne, where over five hundred people were affected[11], 91. Around the same time, Metz experienced similar chaos with the streets reportedly filled with eleven hundred dancers[12]. Farmers left their fields, workers abandoned their jobs, and housewives stepped away from their chores to join the wild festivities, turning this bustling commercial city into a scene of total disorder. Hidden desires surged, often finding opportunities for reckless enjoyment. Many beggars, driven by desperation and vice, took advantage of this new craze to make a quick living. Young men and women ran away from their families, and servants ditched their employers to join the frenzied dances alongside the afflicted, eagerly absorbing this mental contagion. Over a hundred unmarried women were seen wandering aimlessly in both sacred and secular spaces, leading to noticeable consequences[13]. Groups of idle drifters, skilled at mimicking the movements and spasms of those genuinely affected, roamed from place to place, seeking sustenance and new experiences, and spread this revolting spasmodic disease like a plague. In cases like this, those susceptible could be easily infected by mere appearances as well as by the reality of the situation. Eventually, it became necessary to banish these troublesome newcomers, who were immune to both the priests' exorcisms and the doctors' remedies. However, it took four months for the cities along the Rhine to put a stop to these frauds, which greatly worsened the original issue. In the meantime, once this plague was unleashed, it found plenty of fuel in the prevailing mindset of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries; it also persisted, albeit to a lesser extent, through the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, causing a lasting mental disorder and presenting those cities where it was new with bizarre and detestable scenes.

Sect. 2.—St. Vitus' Dance[14].

Strasburg was visited by the “Dancing Plague” in the year 1418, and the same infatuation existed among the people there, 92as in the towns of Belgium and the Lower Rhine[15]. Many who were seized at the sight of those affected, excited attention at first by their confused and absurd behaviour, and then by their constantly following the swarms of dancers. These were seen day and night passing through the streets, accompanied by musicians playing on bagpipes, and by innumerable spectators attracted by curiosity, to which were added anxious parents and relations, who came to look after those among the misguided multitude who belonged to their respective families. Imposture and profligacy played their part in this city also, but the morbid delusion itself seems to have predominated. On this account religion could only bring provisional aid, and therefore the town-council benevolently took an interest in the afflicted. They divided them into separate parties, to each of which they appointed responsible superintendents to protect them from harm, and perhaps also to restrain their turbulence. They were thus conducted on foot and in carriages to the chapels of St. Vitus, near Zabern and Rotestein, where priests 93were in attendance to work upon their misguided minds by masses and other religious ceremonies. After divine worship was completed, they were led in solemn procession to the altar, where they made some small offering of alms, and where it is probable that many were, through the influence of devotion and the sanctity of the place, cured of this lamentable aberration. It is worthy of observation, at all events, that the Dancing Mania did not recommence at the altars of the saint, and that from him alone assistance was implored, and through his miraculous interposition a cure was expected, which was beyond the reach of human skill. The personal history of St. Vitus is by no means unimportant in this matter. He was a Sicilian youth, who, together with Modestus and Crescentia, suffered martyrdom at the time of the persecution of the Christians, under Diocletian, in the year 303[16]. The legends respecting him are obscure, and he would certainly have been passed 94over without notice among the innumerable apocryphal martyrs of the first centuries, had not the transfer of his body to St. Denys, and thence, in the year 836, to Corvey, raised him to a higher rank. From this time forth, it may be supposed that many miracles were manifested at his new sepulchre, which were of essential service in confirming the Roman faith among the Germans, and St. Vitus was soon ranked among the fourteen saintly helpers (Nothhelfer or Apotheker[17]). His altars were multiplied, and the people had recourse to them in all kinds of distresses, and revered him as a powerful intercessor. As the worship of these saints was, however, at that time stripped of all historical connexions, which were purposely obliterated by the priesthood, a legend was invented at the beginning of the fifteenth century, or perhaps even so early as the fourteenth, that St. Vitus had, just before he bent his neck to the sword, prayed to God that he might protect from the Dancing Mania all those who should solemnize the day of his commemoration, and fast upon its eve, and that thereupon a voice from heaven was heard, saying, “Vitus, thy prayer is accepted.”[18] Thus St. Vitus became the patron saint of those afflicted with the dancing plague, as St. Martin, of Tours, was at one time the succourer of persons in small-pox; St. Antonius of those suffering under the “hellish fire,” and as St. Margaret was the Juno Lucina of puerperal women.

Strasburg experienced the “Dancing Plague” in 1418, and the same obsession was present among the people there, 92as in the towns of Belgium and the Lower Rhine[15]. Many who were captivated by the sight of the affected individuals initially drew attention with their chaotic and nonsensical behavior, and then by constantly trailing the groups of dancers. These dancers could be seen day and night moving through the streets, accompanied by musicians playing bagpipes, and countless spectators drawn by curiosity, including worried parents and relatives looking for their family members among the misguided crowd. Deception and immorality played a role in this city as well, but the overwhelming delusion itself seemed to dominate. Because of this, religious efforts could only provide temporary relief, and the town council kindly took an interest in those afflicted. They organized the dancers into separate groups, assigning responsible supervisors to protect them from harm and perhaps to control their chaotic behavior. They were then led, both on foot and in carriages, to the chapels of St. Vitus, near Zabern and Rotestein, where priests 93attended to help guide their misguided minds through masses and other religious rituals. After the worship was completed, they were led in a solemn procession to the altar, where they made small offerings of charity, and it’s likely that many were cured of this unfortunate condition through the influence of devotion and the sanctity of the location. It's worth noting that the Dancing Mania did not resume at the altars of the saint, and that he alone was called upon for help, with people hoping for a miraculous cure beyond human ability. The personal history of St. Vitus is certainly significant here. He was a young Sicilian who, along with Modestus and Crescentia, was martyred during the persecution of Christians under Diocletian in the year 303[16]. The legends surrounding him are vague, and he likely would have gone unnoticed among the countless apocryphal martyrs of the early centuries, had not the transfer of his body to St. Denys and then, in 836, to Corvey raised his profile. From that time, many miracles attributed to him likely occurred at his new tomb, which were essential in strengthening the Roman faith among the Germans, and St. Vitus was soon recognized as one of the fourteen holy helpers (Nothhelfer or Apotheker[17]). His altars grew in number, and people turned to them in various crises, venerating him as a powerful intercessor. However, since the worship of these saints was stripped of all historical connections—deliberately erased by the priesthood—a legend was created in the early fifteenth century, or possibly as early as the fourteenth, claiming that St. Vitus, right before he was martyred, prayed to God to protect those who observed the day of his feast and fasted on the eve of the event. A voice from heaven then answered, “Vitus, your prayer is granted.”[18] Thus, St. Vitus became the patron saint of those suffering from the dancing plague, just as St. Martin of Tours once assisted people with smallpox, St. Antonius helped those afflicted by “hellish fire,” and St. Margaret served as the Juno Lucina for women in childbirth.

Sect. 3.—Causes.

The connexion which John the Baptist had with the dancing mania of the fourteenth century, was of a totally different character. He was originally far from being a protecting saint to those who were attacked, or one who would be likely to give them relief from a malady considered as the work of the devil. On the contrary, the manner in which he was worshipped afforded an important and very evident cause for its development. From the 95remotest period, perhaps even so far back as the fourth century, St. John’s day was solemnized with all sorts of strange and rude customs, of which the originally mystical meaning was variously disfigured among different nations by superadded relics of heathenism[19]. Thus the Germans transferred to the festival of St. John’s day an ancient heathen usage, the kindling of the “Nodfyr,” which was forbidden them by St. Boniface, and the belief subsists even to the present day that people and animals that have leaped through these flames, or their smoke, are protected for a whole year from fevers and other diseases, as if by a kind of baptism by fire[20]. Bacchanalian dances, which have originated in similar causes among all the rude nations of the earth, and the wild extravagancies of a heated imagination, were the constant accompaniments of this half-heathen, half-christian, festival. At the period of which we are treating, however, the Germans were not the only people who gave way to the ebullitions of fanaticism in keeping the festival of St. John the Baptist. Similar customs were also to be found among the nations of Southern Europe and of Asia[21], and it is more than probable that the Greeks transferred to the festival of John the Baptist, who is also held in high esteem among the Mahomedans, a part of their Bacchanalian mysteries, an absurdity of a kind which is but too frequently met with in human affairs. How far a remembrance of the history of St. 96John’s death may have had an influence on this occasion, we would leave learned theologians to decide. It is only of importance here to add, that in Abyssinia, a country entirely separated from Europe, where Christianity has maintained itself in its primeval simplicity against Mahomedanism, John is to this day worshipped, as protecting saint of those who are attacked with the dancing malady[22]. In these fragments of the dominion of mysticism and superstition, historical connexion is not to be found.

The connection that John the Baptist had with the dancing mania of the fourteenth century was completely different. He was never seen as a protective saint for those afflicted or someone likely to relieve them from a condition believed to be caused by the devil. On the contrary, the way he was worshipped actually contributed significantly to its spread. Since at least the fourth century, St. John’s day has been celebrated with various strange and primitive customs, whose original mystical meanings have been distorted over time by different cultures through added remnants of paganism. For example, the Germans adopted an ancient pagan practice, the lighting of the “Nodfyr,” for St. John’s festival, which was banned by St. Boniface. The belief that people and animals who jumped through these flames or their smoke would be protected from fevers and other diseases for an entire year, as if by a kind of baptism by fire, still exists today. Bacchanalian dances, arising from similar origins among various primitive cultures, and the wild excesses of a heated imagination were common features of this half-pagan, half-Christian festival. During the time we are discussing, however, the Germans were not the only ones expressing fanatical behaviors in celebrating St. John the Baptist. Similar customs were also observed among the peoples of Southern Europe and Asia, and it’s likely that the Greeks incorporated elements of their Bacchanalian mysteries into the celebration of John the Baptist, who is also highly regarded by Muslims, which is a common absurdity in human affairs. How much the memory of St. John’s death influenced these practices is something we leave for scholars to determine. It is important to note that in Abyssinia, a region completely isolated from Europe where Christianity has persisted in its original simplicity against Islam, John is still honored as the protective saint for those afflicted by the dancing mania. In these remnants of mysticism and superstition, no historical connection can be found.

When we observe, however, that the first dancers in Aix-la-Chapelle appeared in July with St. John’s name in their mouths, the conjecture is probable that the wild revels of St. John’s day, a. d. 1374, gave rise to this mental plague, which thenceforth has visited so many thousands with incurable aberration of mind, and disgusting distortions of body.

When we notice that the first dancers in Aix-la-Chapelle appeared in July shouting St. John's name, it's reasonable to guess that the wild celebrations of St. John's day, a. d. 1374, led to this mental epidemic, which has since affected countless people with permanent mental disturbances and grotesque physical distortions.

This is rendered so much the more probable, because some months previously the districts in the neighbourhood of the Rhine and the Maine had met with great disasters. So early as February, both these rivers had overflowed their banks to a great extent; the walls of the town of Cologne, on the side next the Rhine, had fallen down, and a great many villages had been reduced to the utmost distress[23]. To this was added the miserable condition of Western and Southern Germany. Neither law nor edict could suppress the incessant feuds of the Barons, and in Franconia especially, the ancient times of club law appeared to be revived. Security of property there was none; arbitrary will everywhere prevailed; corruption of morals and rude power rarely met with even a feeble opposition; whence it arose that the cruel, but lucrative, persecutions of the Jews, were in many places still practised through the whole of this century, with their wonted ferocity. Thus, throughout the western parts of Germany, and especially in the districts bordering on the Rhine, there was a wretched and oppressed populace; and if we take into consideration, that among their numerous bands many wandered about, whose consciences were tormented with the recollection of the crimes which they had 97committed during the prevalence of the black plague, we shall comprehend how their despair sought relief in the intoxication of an artificial delirium[24]. There is hence good ground for supposing that the frantic celebration of the festival of St. John, a.d. 1374, only served to bring to a crisis, a malady which had been long impending; and if we would further inquire how a hitherto harmless usage, which, like many others, had but served to keep up superstition, could degenerate into so serious a disease, we must take into account the unusual excitement of men’s minds, and the consequences of wretchedness and want. The bowels, which in many were debilitated by hunger and bad food, were precisely the parts which in most cases were attacked with excruciating pain, and the tympanitic state of the intestines, points out to the intelligent physician, an origin of the disorder which is well worth consideration.

This seems even more likely because, a few months earlier, the areas around the Rhine and the Maine experienced great disasters. As early as February, both rivers had significantly flooded; the walls of the town of Cologne next to the Rhine had collapsed, and many villages were left in extreme distress[23]. Additionally, the situation in Western and Southern Germany was dire. Neither law nor decree could stop the ongoing feuds among the Barons, and in Franconia especially, it seemed like the old days of mob rule were back. There was no security for property; arbitrary power was everywhere; moral corruption and brute force faced little to no opposition; this led to the cruel but profitable persecution of the Jews, which continued in many areas throughout this century with their usual brutality. Thus, throughout the western parts of Germany, especially in the regions along the Rhine, there was a miserable and oppressed population. Considering that many among them were tormented by their memories of the crimes committed during the peak of the Black Plague, we can understand how their despair sought relief in the intoxication of an artificial delirium[24]. Therefore, there is reasonable ground for believing that the frantic celebration of the festival of St. John, A.D. 1374, merely exacerbated a long-standing issue; and if we further investigate how a once harmless practice, which, like many others, mainly maintained superstition, could transform into such a serious condition, we must consider the unusual excitement of people’s minds and the effects of misery and deprivation. The intestines, which in many were weakened by hunger and poor food, were precisely the areas that commonly suffered excruciating pain, and the swollen state of the intestines indicates to the knowledgeable physician a significant origin of the disorder worth examining.

Sect. 4.—More ancient Dancing Plagues.

The dancing mania of the year 1374 was, in fact, no new disease, but a phenomenon well known in the middle ages, of which many wondrous stories were traditionally current among the people. In the year 1237, upwards of a hundred children were said to have been suddenly seized with this disease at Erfurt, and to have proceeded dancing and jumping along the road to Arnstadt. When they arrived at that place they fell exhausted to the ground, and, according to an account of an old chronicle, many of them, after they were taken home by their parents, died, and the rest remained affected, to the end of their lives, with a permanent tremor[25]. Another occurrence was related to have taken place on the Mosel bridge at Utrecht, on the 17th day of June, a.d. 1278, when two hundred 98fanatics began to dance, and would not desist until a priest passed who was carrying the Host to a person that was sick, upon which, as if in punishment of their crime, the bridge gave way, and they were all drowned[26]. A similar event also occurred so early as the year 1027, near the convent church of Kolbig, not far from Bernburg. According to an oft repeated tradition, eighteen peasants, some of whose names are still preserved, are said to have disturbed divine service on Christmas eve, by dancing and brawling in the churchyard, whereupon the priest, Ruprecht, inflicted a curse upon them, that they should dance and scream for a whole year without ceasing. This curse is stated to have been completely fulfilled, so that the unfortunate sufferers at length sank knee deep into the earth, and remained the whole time without nourishment, until they were finally released by the intercession of two pious bishops. It is said, that upon this, they fell into a deep sleep, which lasted three days, and that four of them died: the rest continuing to suffer all their lives from a trembling of their limbs[27]. It is not worth while to separate what may have been true, and what the addition of crafty priests, in this strangely distorted story. It is sufficient that it was believed, and related with astonishment and horror throughout the middle ages; so that when there was any exciting cause for this delirious raving, and wild rage for dancing, it failed not to produce its effects upon men whose thoughts were given up to a belief in wonders and apparitions.

The dancing mania of 1374 wasn't a new disease but rather a phenomenon that was well-known during the Middle Ages, with many incredible stories shared among the people. In 1237, over a hundred children were said to have suddenly been struck by this condition in Erfurt, and they danced and jumped their way to Arnstadt. When they got there, they collapsed from exhaustion, and according to an old chronicle, many of them died after their parents took them home, with the remaining ones suffering from a lasting tremor for the rest of their lives[25]. Another incident occurred on the Mosel bridge in Utrecht on June 17, A.D. 1278, when two hundred 98 fanatics started dancing and wouldn't stop until a priest carrying the Host to a sick person passed by. As if to punish them for their actions, the bridge collapsed, and they all drowned[26]. A similar event happened as early as 1027 near the convent church of Kolbig, not far from Bernburg. According to a frequently told tale, eighteen peasants, some of whose names are still remembered, disrupted worship on Christmas Eve by dancing and fighting in the churchyard. The priest, Ruprecht, cursed them, declaring they would dance and scream continuously for a whole year. This curse was reportedly fulfilled, leading the unfortunate souls to sink knee-deep into the ground and go without food for the entire time until they were finally freed through the intercession of two devout bishops. It’s said that afterward, they fell into a deep sleep lasting three days, and four of them died, while the others continued to suffer from trembling limbs for the rest of their lives[27]. It's not worth distinguishing what might have been true from what was added by crafty priests in this bizarre tale. What's important is that it was widely believed and recounted with shock and horror throughout the Middle Ages; whenever there was something to spark this frenzied dancing and wild excitement, it had a strong effect on people who were already inclined to believe in wonders and supernatural occurrences.

This disposition of mind, altogether so peculiar to the middle ages, and which, happily for mankind, has yielded to an improved state of civilization and the diffusion of popular instruction, accounts for the origin and long duration of this extraordinary mental disorder. The good sense of the people recoiled with horror and aversion from this heavy plague, which, whenever malevolent persons wished to curse their bitterest enemies and adversaries, was long after used as a malediction[28]. The 99indignation also that was felt by the people at large against the immorality of the age, was proved by their ascribing this frightful affliction to the inefficacy of baptism by unchaste priests, as if innocent children were doomed to atone, in after years, for this desecration of the sacrament administered by unholy hands[29]. We have already mentioned what perils the priests in the Netherlands incurred from this belief. They now, indeed, endeavoured to hasten their reconciliation with the irritated, and at that time very degenerate people[30], by exorcisms, which, with some, procured them greater respect than ever, because they thus visibly restored thousands of those who were affected. In general, however, there prevailed a want of confidence in their efficacy, and then the sacred rites had as little power in arresting the progress of this deeply rooted malady, as the prayers and holy services subsequently had at the altars of the greatly revered martyr St. Vitus. We may therefore ascribe it to accident merely, and to a certain aversion to this demoniacal disease, which seemed to lie beyond the reach of human skill, that we meet with but few and imperfect notices, of the St. Vitus’s dance in the second half of the fifteenth century. The highly coloured descriptions of the sixteenth century contradict the notion that this mental plague had in any degree diminished in its severity, and not a single fact is to be found which supports the opinion, that any one of the essential symptoms of the disease, not even excepting the tympany, had disappeared, or that the disorder itself had become milder in its attacks. The physicians never, as it seems, throughout the whole of the fifteenth century, undertook the treatment of the dancing mania, which, according to the prevailing notions, appertained exclusively to the servants of the church. Against demoniacal disorders they had no remedies, and though some at first did promulgate the opinion, that the malady had its origin in natural circumstances, such as a hot temperament, and other causes named in the phraseology of the schools[31], yet these opinions 100were the less examined, as it did not appear worth while to divide with a jealous priesthood, the care of a host of fanatical vagabonds and beggars.

This mindset, unique to the Middle Ages, which, luckily for humanity, has given way to a better state of civilization and the spread of public education, explains the origin and long persistence of this unusual mental disorder. The common sense of the people reacted with horror and disgust to this dreadful plague that, whenever malicious individuals wanted to curse their worst enemies, would later be used as a curse[28]. The 99 outrage felt by the general public against the immorality of the time was shown by their belief that this terrible affliction was a result of ineffective baptisms performed by impure priests, as if innocent children were condemned to suffer later in life for this desecration of the sacrament given by unholy hands[29]. We've already talked about the dangers faced by priests in the Netherlands due to this belief. They attempted to quickly regain the favor of the angry and, at that time, very corrupt people[30], through exorcisms, which gained them greater respect from some, as they visibly restored thousands who were affected. However, in general, there was a lack of faith in their effectiveness, and the sacred rites had as little power to stop the spread of this deep-seated illness as the prayers and holy services later had at the altars of the highly revered martyr St. Vitus. Therefore, we can attribute the scarcity of comprehensive accounts of St. Vitus's dance in the latter half of the fifteenth century to chance alone, along with a certain aversion to this demonic illness, which seemed beyond human ability to treat. The colorful accounts from the sixteenth century contradict the idea that this mental plague had in any way lessened in severity, and there's no evidence to support the belief that any of the key symptoms of the disease, including tympany, had vanished, or that the disorder itself had become less severe. Throughout the entire fifteenth century, it seems physicians never took on the treatment of dancing mania, which was thought at the time to belong solely to the church's domain. They had no remedies for demonic disorders, and while some initially suggested that the illness came from some natural causes, like a hot temperament, and other factors defined by academic jargon[31], these ideas received little scrutiny, as it didn't seem worthwhile to share the responsibility for a host of fanatical vagabonds and beggars with a jealous priesthood.

Sect. 5.—Physicians.

It was not until the beginning of the sixteenth century that the St. Vitus’s dance was made the subject of medical research, and stripped of its unhallowed character as a work of demons. This was effected by Paracelsus, that mighty, but as yet scarcely comprehended reformer of medicine, whose aim it was to withdraw diseases from the pale of miraculous interpositions and saintly influences, and explain their causes upon principles deduced from his knowledge of the human frame. “We will not, however, admit that the saints have power to inflict diseases, and that these ought to be named after them, although many there are who, in their theology, lay great stress on this supposition, ascribing them rather to God than to nature, which is but idle talk. We dislike such nonsensical gossip as is not supported by symptoms, but only by faith, a thing which is not human, whereon the gods themselves set no value.”

It wasn't until the early sixteenth century that St. Vitus's dance became the focus of medical research and lost its connection to demons. This change was brought about by Paracelsus, a powerful but still misunderstood reformer of medicine. His goal was to take diseases out of the realm of miraculous events and saintly influences and explain their causes based on his understanding of the human body. “However, we won't accept that the saints have the power to cause diseases, or that these diseases should be named after them, even though many people in their theology emphasize this idea, attributing them more to God than to nature, which is just meaningless chatter. We don't appreciate such nonsensical talk that isn't backed by symptoms but only by faith, which isn't human, and that even the gods themselves value little.”

Such were the words which Paracelsus addressed to his contemporaries, who were as yet incapable of appreciating doctrines of this sort; for the belief in enchantment still remained everywhere unshaken, and faith in the world of spirits still held men’s minds in so close a bondage that thousands were, according to their own conviction, given up as a prey to the devil; while at the command of religion as well as of law, countless piles were lighted, by the flames of which human society was to be purified.

Such were the words that Paracelsus spoke to his contemporaries, who were still unable to understand such ideas; the belief in magic was still strong everywhere, and faith in the spirit world kept people's minds in such tight grips that thousands were, according to their own beliefs, considered to be victims of the devil. Meanwhile, both religion and law commanded that countless bonfires be lit, with the flames intended to purify human society.

Paracelsus divides the St. Vitus’s dance into three kinds. First, that which arises from imagination (Vitista, Chorea imaginativa, æstimativa), by which the original dancing plague is to be understood. Secondly, that which arises from sensual desires, depending on the will (Chorea lasciva). Thirdly, that which arises from corporeal causes (Chorea naturalis, coacta), which, according to a strange notion of his own, he explained by maintaining, that in certain vessels which are susceptible of an internal pruriency, and thence produce laughter, the blood is set in commotion, in consequence of an alteration in the vital spirits, whereby involuntary fits of intoxicating joy, and a101 propensity to dance, are occasioned[32]. To this notion he was, no doubt, led from having observed a milder form of St. Vitus’s dance, not uncommon in his time, which was accompanied by involuntary laughter; and which bore a resemblance to the hysterical laughter of the moderns, except that it was characterized by more pleasurable sensations, and by an extravagant propensity to dance. There was no howling, screaming, and jumping, as in the severer form; neither was the disposition to dance by any means insuperable. Patients thus affected, although they had not a complete control over their understandings, yet were sufficiently self-possessed, during the attack, to obey the directions which they received. There were even some among them who did not dance at all, but only felt an involuntary impulse to allay the internal sense of disquietude, which is the usual forerunner of an attack of this kind, by laughter, and quick walking carried to the extent of producing fatigue[33]. This disorder, so different from the original type, evidently approximates to the modern chorea; or rather is in perfect accordance with it, even to the less essential symptom of laughter. A mitigation in the form of the dancing mania had thus clearly taken place at the commencement of the sixteenth century.

Paracelsus categorizes St. Vitus’s dance into three types. First, there’s the kind that comes from imagination (Vitista, Chorea imaginativa, æstimativa), which refers to the original dancing plague. Second, there’s the type that comes from sensual desires, linked to will (Chorea lasciva). Third, there’s the kind that comes from physical causes (Chorea naturalis, coacta). He explained this last type, based on his unique view, by suggesting that in certain vessels susceptible to internal irritation—which then leads to laughter—blood is stirred up due to a change in vital spirits, causing involuntary fits of joyous intoxication and a tendency to dance. He likely arrived at this idea after observing a milder version of St. Vitus’s dance, not uncommon in his day, characterized by involuntary laughter and resembling modern hysterical laughter, except it included more pleasurable sensations and an exaggerated urge to dance. There was no howling, screaming, or jumping, as seen in the more severe form; the urge to dance was not overpowering. Those affected, while not entirely in control of their minds, could still follow instructions during the episode. Some didn't dance at all but felt an involuntary need to ease their inner restlessness, which usually precedes such attacks, through laughter and brisk walking until they became fatigued. This disorder, clearly different from the original type, is very similar to modern chorea; or rather, it aligns perfectly with it, even including the less significant symptom of laughter. By the early sixteenth century, a milder version of the dancing mania had clearly emerged.

On the communication of the St. Vitus’s dance by sympathy, Paracelsus, in his peculiar language, expresses himself with great spirit, and shows a profound knowledge of the nature of sensual impressions, which find their way to the heart,—the seat of joys and emotions,—which overpower the opposition of reason; and whilst “all other qualities and natures” are subdued, incessantly impel the patient, in consequence of his original compliance, and his all conquering imagination, to imitate what he has seen. On his treatment of the disease, we cannot bestow any great praise, but must be content with the remark, that it was in conformity with the notions of the age in which he lived. For the first kind, which often originated in passionate excitement, he had a mental remedy, the efficacy of which is not to be despised, if we estimate its value in connexion 102with the prevalent opinions of those times. The patient was to make an image of himself in wax or resin, and by an effort of thought to concentrate all his blasphemies and sins in it. “Without the intervention of any other person, to set his whole mind and thoughts concerning these oaths in the image;” and when he had succeeded in this, he was to burn the image, so that not a particle of it should remain[34]. In all this there was no mention made of St. Vitus, or any of the other mediatory saints, which is accounted for by the circumstance, that, at this time, an open rebellion against the Romish Church had begun, and the worship of saints was by many rejected as idolatrous[35]. For the second kind of St. Vitus’s dance, arising from sensual irritation, with which women were far more frequently affected than men, Paracelsus recommended harsh treatment and strict fasting. He directed that the patients should be deprived of their liberty; placed in solitary confinement, and made to sit in an uncomfortable place, until their misery brought them to their senses and to a feeling of penitence. He then permitted them gradually to return to their accustomed habits. Severe corporal chastisement was not omitted; but, on the other hand, angry resistance on the part of the patient was to be sedulously avoided, on the ground that it might increase his malady, or even destroy him: moreover, where it seemed proper, Paracelsus allayed the excitement of the nerves by immersion in cold water. On the treatment 103of the third kind we shall not here enlarge. It was to be effected by all sorts of wonderful remedies, composed of the quintessences; and it would require, to render it intelligible, a more extended exposition of peculiar principles than suits our present purpose.

On the communication of St. Vitus's dance through sympathy, Paracelsus, in his unique style, expresses himself with great energy and demonstrates a deep understanding of how sensual impressions affect the heart—where joy and emotions reside—overpowering reason. While "all other qualities and natures" are subdued, these impressions constantly push the patient, due to their original compliance and powerful imagination, to mimic what they've seen. We can't give much praise to his treatment of the disease, but we can note that it aligned with the beliefs of his time. For the first type, which often arose from passionate excitement, he proposed a mental remedy that shouldn't be underestimated, considering its value in the context of prevalent ideas of that era. The patient was to create an image of themselves in wax or resin and focus all their blasphemies and sins into it. "Without the intervention of any other person, to set his whole mind and thoughts concerning these oaths in the image;" and once successful, they were to burn the image completely so that not a single piece remained. In all of this, there was no mention of St. Vitus or any other mediating saints, which is explained by the fact that, at this time, a rebellion against the Catholic Church had started, and many rejected the worship of saints as idolatrous. For the second type of St. Vitus's dance, stemming from sensual irritation, which affected women more often than men, Paracelsus recommended harsh treatments and strict fasting. He instructed that patients should be confined, placed in isolation, and made to sit in an uncomfortable position until their suffering brought them to their senses and feelings of repentance. He then allowed them to gradually return to their normal habits. Physical punishment was also used, but it was important to avoid angry resistance from the patient, as it could worsen their condition or even harm them. Additionally, where appropriate, Paracelsus eased nervous tension by immersing patients in cold water. We will not elaborate on the treatment of the third type here. It involved all sorts of remarkable remedies made from essences, and explaining it would require a more in-depth discussion of specific principles than we wish to undertake at this time.

Sect. 6.—Decline and Termination of the Dancing Plague.

About this time the St. Vitus’s dance began to decline, so that milder forms of it appeared more frequently, while the severer cases became more rare; and even in these, some of the important symptoms gradually disappeared. Paracelsus makes no mention of the tympanites as taking place after the attacks, although it may occasionally have occurred; and Schenck von Graffenberg, a celebrated physician of the latter half of the sixteenth century[36], speaks of this disease as having been frequent only in the time of his forefathers; his descriptions, however, are applicable to the whole of that century, and to the close of the fifteenth[37]. The St. Vitus’s dance attacked people of all stations, especially those who led a sedentary life, such as shoemakers and tailors; but even the most robust peasants abandoned their labours in the fields, as if they were possessed by evil spirits; and thus those affected were seen assembling indiscriminately, from time to time, at certain appointed places, and, unless prevented by the lookers on, continuing to dance without intermission, until their very last breath was expended. Their fury and extravagance of demeanour so completely deprived them of their senses, that many of them dashed their brains out against the walls and corners of buildings, or rushed headlong into rapid rivers, where they found a watery grave. Roaring and foaming as they were, the bystanders could only succeed in restraining them by placing benches and chairs in their way, so that, by the high leaps they were thus tempted to take, their strength might be exhausted. As soon as this was the case, they fell as it were lifeless to the ground, and, by very slow degrees, again recovered their strength. Many there were, 104who, even with all this exertion, had not expended the violence of the tempest which raged within them, but awoke with newly revived powers, and again and again mixed with the crowd of dancers, until at length the violent excitement of their disordered nerves was allayed by the great involuntary exertion of their limbs; and the mental disorder was calmed by the extreme exhaustion of the body. Thus the attacks themselves were in these cases, as in their nature they are in all nervous complaints, necessary crises of an inward morbid condition, which was transferred from the sensorium to the nerves of motion, and, at an earlier period, to the abdominal plexus, where a deep-seated derangement of the system was perceptible from the secretion of flatus in the intestines.

Around this time, St. Vitus’s dance started to fade, with milder forms becoming more common and the severe cases becoming rarer; even in these, some major symptoms gradually disappeared. Paracelsus doesn’t mention tympanites occurring after the attacks, although it might have happened occasionally; Schenck von Graffenberg, a well-known physician from the late sixteenth century, notes that this disease was common only in his ancestors’ time; however, his descriptions apply to the entire century and the end of the fifteenth century. St. Vitus’s dance affected people from all walks of life, especially those with sedentary jobs, like shoemakers and tailors; but even the strongest peasants would stop working in the fields as if they were haunted by evil spirits. Those affected were often seen gathering randomly at certain places, and unless held back by onlookers, they would continue to dance nonstop until they literally dropped. Their wild behavior completely overwhelmed them, leading many to smash their heads against walls or corners, or to plunge into fast rivers, meeting their end in the water. Despite their chaotic state, bystanders could only manage to control them by blocking their path with benches and chairs, hoping that the high jumps would wear them out. Once they were exhausted, they would collapse to the ground and, gradually, regain their strength. Many were still so charged with energy that they woke up with renewed vigor and jumped back into the crowd of dancers until the intense agitation of their nerves calmed down through the extreme physical effort, and their mental disorder settled down with complete exhaustion of the body. Thus, these episodes were, as they are in all nervous disorders, necessary events of a deeper morbid condition, which transferred from the mind to the motor nerves and, earlier on, to the abdominal plexus, where a significant disturbance in the system was evident from the buildup of gas in the intestines.

The cure effected by these stormy attacks was in many cases so perfect, that some patients returned to the factory or the plough as if nothing had happened. Others, on the contrary, paid the penalty of their folly by so total a loss of power, that they could not regain their former health, even by the employment of the most strengthening remedies. Medical men were astonished to observe, that women in an advanced state of pregnancy were capable of going through an attack of the disease, without the slightest injury to their offspring, which they protected merely by a bandage passed round the waist. Cases of this kind were not unfrequent so late as Schenck’s time. That patients should be violently affected by music, and their paroxysms brought on and increased by it, is natural with such nervous disorders; where deeper impressions are made through the ear, which is the most intellectual of all the organs, than through any of the other senses. On this account the magistrates hired musicians for the purpose of carrying the St. Vitus’s dancers so much the quicker through the attacks, and directed, that athletic men should be sent among them in order to complete the exhaustion, which had been often observed to produce a good effect[38]. At the same time there was a prohibition against 105wearing red garments, because, at the sight of this colour, those affected became so furious, that they flew at the persons who wore it, and were so bent upon doing them an injury that they could with difficulty be restrained. They frequently tore their own clothes whilst in the paroxysm, and were guilty of other improprieties, so that the more opulent employed confidential attendants to accompany them, and to take care that they did no harm either to themselves or others. This extraordinary disease was, however, so greatly mitigated in Schenck’s time, that the St. Vitus’s dancers had long since ceased to stroll from town to town; and that physician, like Paracelsus, makes no mention of the tympanitic inflation of the bowels. Moreover, most of those affected, were only annually visited by attacks; and the occasion of them was so manifestly referrible to the prevailing notions of that period, that if the unqualified belief in the supernatural agency of saints could have been abolished, they would not have had any return of the complaint. Throughout the whole of June, prior to the festival of St. John, patients felt a disquietude and restlessness which they were unable to overcome. They were dejected, timid, and anxious; wandered about in an unsettled state, being tormented with twitching pains, which seized them suddenly in different parts, and eagerly expected the eve of St. John’s day, in the confident hope, that by dancing at the altars of this saint, or of St. Vitus, (for in the Breisgau aid was equally sought from both,) they would be freed from all their sufferings. This hope was not disappointed; and they remained, for the rest of the year, exempt from any further attack, after having thus, by dancing and raving for three hours, satisfied an irresistible demand of nature. There were at that period two chapels in the Breisgau, visited by the St. Vitus’s dancers; namely, the Chapel of St. Vitus at Biessen, near Breisach, and that of St. John, near Wasenweiler; and it is probable that in the south-west of Germany, the disease was still in existence in the seventeenth century.

The cure brought about by these intense attacks was often so effective that some patients returned to work in factories or on farms as if nothing had happened. Others, however, suffered the consequences of their reckless behavior and experienced such a complete loss of vitality that they couldn’t regain their previous health, even with the strongest treatments. Doctors were amazed to see that women in the later stages of pregnancy could endure an attack of the disease without harming their babies, whom they protected simply by wearing a band around their waist. Cases like this were not uncommon even in Schenck’s time. It was natural for patients with nervous disorders to be significantly affected by music, which could trigger and intensify their episodes, as deeper impressions are made through hearing—the most intellectual of all senses—compared to the others. Therefore, the authorities hired musicians to help St. Vitus’s dancers get through their attacks more quickly and instructed strong men to join them in order to expedite their exhaustion, which was often observed to have a positive effect[38]. At the same time, there was a ban on wearing red clothing because, when they saw this color, those affected became so enraged that they would lash out at anyone wearing it. They were so determined to cause harm that they could barely be restrained. They often ripped their own clothes during these fits and displayed other inappropriate behavior, prompting wealthier individuals to hire trusted attendants to accompany them and ensure they didn’t hurt themselves or others. This bizarre illness was significantly less severe in Schenck’s time, as the St. Vitus dancers had long stopped wandering from town to town. That physician, like Paracelsus, did not mention the bloating of the abdomen. Moreover, most of those affected experienced attacks only once a year, and the triggers were so obviously linked to the beliefs of that time that if the strong belief in the supernatural influence of saints had been removed, they likely wouldn’t have experienced any recurrence of the affliction. Throughout June, leading up to the festival of St. John, patients felt anxious and restless, unable to find relief. They were depressed, fearful, and troubled; they roamed around in a state of disarray, plagued by sudden, twitching pains in various parts of their bodies, and eagerly awaited the eve of St. John’s Day, hoping that by dancing at the altars of this saint or St. Vitus (as both were sought for help in the Breisgau), they would be freed from all their struggles. This hope was fulfilled, and they remained unaffected for the rest of the year after spending three hours dancing and raving to satisfy an overwhelming need. At that time, there were two chapels in the Breisgau frequented by the St. Vitus dancers: the Chapel of St. Vitus at Biessen, near Breisach, and the Chapel of St. John, near Wasenweiler. It’s likely that the disease still existed in the southwest of Germany in the seventeenth century.

However, it grew every year more rare, so that, at the beginning of the seventeenth century, it was observed only occasionally in its ancient form. Thus in the spring of the year 1623, G. Horst saw some women who annually performed a pilgrimage to St. 106Vitus’s chapel at Drefelhausen, near Weissenstein, in the territory of Ulm, that they might wait for their dancing fit there, in the same manner as those in the Breisgau did, according to Schenck’s account. They were not satisfied, however, with a dance of three hours’ duration, but continued day and night in a state of mental aberration, like persons in an ecstacy, until they fell exhausted to the ground; and when they came to themselves again, they felt relieved from a distressing uneasiness and painful sensation of weight in their bodies, of which they had complained for several weeks prior to St. Vitus’s day[39].

However, it became increasingly rare each year, so that by the early seventeenth century, it was only occasionally seen in its original form. In the spring of 1623, G. Horst observed some women who made an annual pilgrimage to St. 106Vitus’s chapel at Drefelhausen, near Weissenstein, in the Ulm region, so they could wait for their dancing episode there, just like those in Breisgau, as reported by Schenck. They weren’t satisfied with a dance lasting three hours; instead, they kept going both day and night in a state of madness, like people in ecstasy, until they collapsed from exhaustion. When they finally regained their senses, they felt a sense of relief from a troubling uneasiness and painful heaviness in their bodies, which they had been complaining about for several weeks leading up to St. Vitus’s day[39].

After this commotion they remained well for the whole year; and such was their faith in the protecting power of the saint, that one of them had visited this shrine at Drefelhausen more than twenty times, and another had already kept the Saint’s day for the thirty-second time at this sacred station.

After this commotion, they stayed well for the entire year; and their belief in the protective power of the saint was so strong that one of them had visited this shrine at Drefelhausen more than twenty times, and another had already celebrated the Saint’s day for the thirty-second time at this sacred site.

The dancing fit itself was excited here, as it probably was in other places, by music, from the effects of which, the patients were thrown into a state of convulsion[40]. Many concurrent testimonies serve to show that music generally contributed much to the continuance of the St. Vitus’s dance, originated, and increased its paroxysms, and was sometimes the cause of their mitigation. So early as the fourteenth century, the swarms of St. John’s dancers were accompanied by minstrels playing upon noisy instruments, who roused their morbid feelings; and it may readily be supposed that, by the performance of lively melodies, and the stimulating effects which the shrill tones of fifes and trumpets would produce, a paroxysm, that was perhaps but slight in itself, might, in many cases, be increased to the most outrageous fury, such as in later times, was purposely induced in order that the force of the disease might be exhausted by the violence of its attack. Moreover, by means of intoxicating music a kind of demoniacal festival for the rude multitude was established, which had the effect of spreading this unhappy malady wider and wider. Soft harmony was, however, employed to calm the excitement of those affected, and it is mentioned as a character of the tunes played with this view to the St. Vitus’s dancers, that they contained transitions from a quick to 107a slow measure, and passed gradually from a high to a low key[41]. It is to be regretted that no trace of this music has reached our times, which is owing partly to the disastrous events of the seventeenth century, and partly to the circumstance that the disorder was looked upon as entirely national, and only incidentally considered worthy of notice by foreign men of learning. If the St. Vitus’s dance was already on the decline at the commencement of the seventeenth century, the subsequent events were altogether adverse to its continuance. Wars carried on with animosity and with various success for thirty years, shook the west of Europe; and although the unspeakable calamities which they brought upon Germany, both during their continuance, and in their immediate consequences, were by no means favourable to the advance of knowledge, yet, with the vehemence of a purifying fire, they gradually effected the intellectual regeneration of the Germans; superstition, in her ancient form, never again appeared, and the belief in the dominion of spirits, which prevailed in the middle ages, lost for ever its once formidable power.

The dancing phenomenon here was energized, just like it probably was in other places, by music, which often threw the patients into a state of convulsion[40]. Many reports indicate that music generally played a big role in the persistence of St. Vitus's dance, sparking and intensifying its spasms, and sometimes even helping to ease them. As far back as the fourteenth century, groups of St. John’s dancers were accompanied by minstrels playing loud instruments that stirred their troubled feelings; it’s easy to imagine that lively tunes and the sharp sounds of fifes and trumpets could elevate a minor episode into a furious outburst, something that was later intentionally triggered to help release the intensity of the illness through its violent episodes. Additionally, a kind of wild festival fueled by intoxicating music emerged for the rough crowds, which helped spread this unfortunate condition further and further. On the other hand, soothing melodies were used to calm those affected, and it’s noted that the tunes aimed at St. Vitus’s dancers had a characteristic shift from fast to slow tempos and gradually moved from a high to a low pitch[41]. It’s unfortunate that no remnants of this music have survived to the present day, due in part to the disastrous events of the seventeenth century, and also because the disorder was viewed as entirely national, only occasionally deemed worthy of attention by foreign scholars. If St. Vitus’s dance was already declining at the start of the seventeenth century, subsequent events were completely detrimental to its continuation. Wars, marked by intense hostility and varying degrees of success over thirty years, ravaged western Europe; and although the indescribable disasters they inflicted upon Germany, both during and immediately after, were not conducive to knowledge advancement, they ironically sparked an intellectual revival among the Germans. Superstition, in its old form, never returned, and the belief in the influence of spirits, which held sway during the Middle Ages, permanently lost its once-formidable power.


CHAPTER II.
Dancing craze in Italy.

Sect. 1.—Tarantism.

It was of the utmost advantage to the St. Vitus’s dancers that they made choice of a favourite patron saint; for, not to mention that people were inclined to compare them to the possessed with evil spirits, described in the Bible, and thence to consider them as innocent victims to the power of Satan, the name of their great intercessor recommended them to general commiseration, and a magic boundary was thus set to every harsh feeling which might otherwise have proved hostile to their safety. Other fanatics were not so fortunate, being often treated with the most relentless cruelty whenever the notions of the middle ages either excused or commanded it as a religious duty[42].

It was a huge advantage for the St. Vitus’s dancers that they chose a beloved patron saint; for, aside from the fact that people were likely to compare them to those possessed by evil spirits, as described in the Bible, and thus view them as innocent victims of Satan's power, the name of their great intercessor earned them widespread sympathy. This created a protective barrier against any harsh feelings that might otherwise threaten their safety. Other fanatics weren't as lucky, often facing ruthless cruelty whenever the ideas of the Middle Ages justified or mandated it as a religious duty[42].

108

108

Thus, passing over the innumerable instances of the burning of witches, who were, after all, only labouring under a delusion, the Teutonic knights in Prussia not unfrequently condemned those maniacs to the stake who imagined themselves to be metamorphosed into wolves[43]—an extraordinary species of insanity, which, having existed in Greece, before our era, spread, in process of time, over Europe, so that it was communicated not only to the Romaic, but also to the German and Sarmatian nations, and descended from the ancients, as a legacy of affliction 109to posterity. In modern times, Lycanthropy, such was the name given to this infatuation, has vanished from the earth, but it is nevertheless well worthy the consideration of the observer of human aberrations, and a history of it by some writer who is equally well acquainted with the middle ages as with antiquity is still a desideratum[44]. We leave it, for the present, 110without further notice, and turn to a malady most extraordinary in all its phenomena, having a close connexion with the St. Vitus’s dance, and, by a comparison of facts, which are altogether similar, affording us an instructive subject for contemplation. We allude to the disease called Tarantism, which made its first appearance in Apulia, and thence spread over the other provinces of Italy, where, during some centuries, it prevailed as a great epidemic. In the present times it has vanished, or at least has lost altogether its original importance, like the St. Vitus’s dance, lycanthropy, and witchcraft.

So, skipping over the countless examples of witch burnings, who were just deluded individuals, the Teutonic knights in Prussia often sentenced those crazies to be burned at the stake who thought they had turned into wolves—a bizarre form of insanity that, having existed in Greece before our era, eventually spread across Europe. It was shared not just with the Greeks, but also the German and Sarmatian people, passing down from ancient times as a legacy of suffering to future generations. In modern times, Lycanthropy, as this obsession was called, has disappeared from the world, but it’s still worth examining for anyone interested in human abnormalities, and a detailed history of it by someone knowledgeable about both the Middle Ages and antiquity is still needed. For now, we’ll set it aside without further comment and turn to another extraordinary illness, which closely relates to St. Vitus's dance, providing an insightful subject for reflection through the comparison of entirely similar facts. We’re referring to the disease known as Tarantism, which first emerged in Apulia and then spread to other provinces of Italy, where it acted as a major epidemic for several centuries. Nowadays, it has disappeared, or at least has lost its original significance, just like St. Vitus's dance, lycanthropy, and witchcraft.

Sect. 2.—Most ancient Traces.—Causes.

The learned Nicholas Perotti[45] gives the earliest account of this strange disorder. Nobody had the least doubt that it was caused by the bite of the tarantula[46][47], a ground-spider common 111in Apulia; and the fear of this insect was so general, that its bite was in all probability much oftener imagined, or the sting of some other kind of insect mistaken for it, than actually received. The word tarantula is apparently the same as terrantola, a name given by the Italians to the stellio of the old Romans, which was a kind of lizard[48], said to be poisonous, and invested by credulity with such extraordinary qualities, that, like the serpent of the Mosaic account of the Creation, it personified, in the imaginations of the vulgar, the notion of cunning, so that even the jurists designated a cunning fraud by the appellation of a “stellionatus”[49]. Perotti expressly assures us that this reptile was called by the Romans tarantula; and since he himself, who was one of the most distinguished authors of his time, strangely confounds spiders and lizards together, so that he considers the Apulian tarantula, which he ranks among the class of spiders, to have the same meaning as the kind of lizard, called ἀσκαλαβώτης[50], it is the less extraordinary that the unlearned country people of Apulia should confound the much dreaded ground-spider with the fabulous star-lizard[51], and appropriate to the one the name of the other. The derivation of the word tarantula, from the city of Tarentum, or the river Thara, in Apulia[52], on the banks of which this insect is said to have been most frequently found, or at least its bite to have had the most venomous effect, seems not to be supported by authority. So much for the name of this famous spider, which, unless we are greatly mistaken, throws no light whatever upon the nature of the disease in question. Naturalists who, possessing a knowledge of the past, should not misapply their talents by employing them in establishing the dry distinction of forms, would find here much that calls for research, and their efforts would clear up many a perplexing obscurity.

The knowledgeable Nicholas Perotti gives the earliest description of this unusual disorder. Everyone believed it was caused by the bite of the tarantula, a ground spider commonly found in Apulia; and the fear of this creature was so widespread that people probably imagined its bite or mistook the sting of another insect for it far more often than they actually encountered it. The term “tarantula” seems to be derived from “terrantola,” which the Italians used for a type of lizard known to the ancient Romans, believed to be poisonous and surrounded by myth, representing cunning in the minds of the general public. Even jurists referred to a clever deceit as “stellionatus.” Perotti explicitly tells us that the Romans called this reptile “tarantula”; since he, one of the most notable authors of his time, oddly mixes up spiders and lizards, considering the Apulian tarantula—a spider—to be the same as the lizard called ἀσκαλαβώτης, it’s not surprising that the uneducated rural people of Apulia would confuse the feared ground spider with the mythical star-lizard and use one name for the other. The origin of the word tarantula, from the city of Tarentum or the river Thara in Apulia—where this insect was said to be most commonly found, or at least where its bite was thought to have the most toxic effect—does not seem to be well-supported. That’s all there is to say about the name of this famous spider, which, unless we’re mistaken, doesn’t shed any light on the nature of the disease in question. Naturalists, who know about the past, should not waste their skills merely categorizing forms; there is much here that requires investigation, and their work could clarify many confusing issues.

112

112

Perotti states that the tarantula, that is, the spider so called, was not met with in Italy in former times, but that in his day it had become common, especially in Apulia, as well as in some other districts. He deserves, however, no great confidence as a naturalist, notwithstanding his having delivered lectures in Bologna on medicine and other sciences[53]. He at least has neglected to prove his assertion, which is not borne out by any analogous phenomenon observed in modern times with regard to the history of the spider species. It is by no means to be admitted that the tarantula did not make its appearance in Italy before the disease ascribed to its bite became remarkable, even though tempests more violent than those unexampled storms which arose at the time of the Black Death[54] in the middle of the fourteenth century had set the insect world in motion; for the spider is little, if at all, susceptible of those cosmical influences which at times multiply locusts and other winged insects to a wonderful extent, and compel them to migrate.

Perotti claims that the tarantula, specifically the spider by that name, wasn’t found in Italy in the past, but during his time, it had become common, especially in Apulia and some other areas. However, he shouldn’t be trusted too much as a naturalist, even though he gave lectures in Bologna on medicine and other sciences[53]. At the very least, he has failed to back up his claim, which isn’t supported by any similar evidence observed in modern times regarding the history of spider species. It's not reasonable to accept that the tarantula didn’t appear in Italy before the disease attributed to its bite became notable, even though storms more severe than the unprecedented tempests during the Black Death[54] in the mid-fourteenth century had disrupted the insect population; after all, the spider is hardly affected by those cosmic influences that can sometimes cause locusts and other flying insects to multiply dramatically and force them to migrate.

The symptoms which Perotti enumerates as consequent on the bite of the tarantula agree very exactly with those described by later writers. Those who were bitten, generally fell into a state of melancholy, and appeared to be stupified, and scarcely in possession of their senses. This condition was, in many cases, united with so great a sensibility to music, that, at the very first tones of their favourite melodies, they sprang up, shouting for joy, and danced on without intermission, until they sank to the ground exhausted and almost lifeless. In others, the disease did not take this cheerful turn. They wept constantly, and as if pining away with some unsatisfied desire, spent their days in the greatest misery and anxiety. Others, again, in morbid fits of love, cast their longing looks on women, and instances of death are recorded, which are said to have occurred under a paroxysm of either laughing or weeping.

The symptoms that Perotti lists as a result of a tarantula bite match closely with those described by later authors. Those who were bitten typically fell into a state of deep sadness, appearing dazed and barely aware of their surroundings. In many cases, this condition was accompanied by an intense sensitivity to music; at the first notes of their favorite songs, they would jump up, shouting with joy, and dance nonstop until they collapsed from exhaustion, nearly lifeless. In other cases, the illness did not have this joyful outcome. They cried continuously and seemed to be fading away from some unfulfilled longing, spending their days in misery and anxiety. Others, in fits of unhealthy love, gazed longingly at women, and there are accounts of deaths said to have occurred during extreme episodes of either laughter or weeping.

From this description, incomplete as it is, we may easily gather that tarantism, the essential symptoms of which are mentioned in it, could not have originated in the fifteenth century, to which Perotti’s account refers; for that author speaks of it as a well known malady, and states that the omission to notice it by older writers, was to be ascribed solely to the want of education 113in Apulia, the only province probably where the disease at that time prevailed. A nervous disorder that had arrived at so high a degree of development, must have been long in existence, and doubtless had required an elaborate preparation by the concurrence of general causes.

From this description, though incomplete, we can easily conclude that tarantism, the main symptoms of which are mentioned here, could not have started in the fifteenth century, which is when Perotti's account refers to; that author describes it as a well-known illness and suggests that the lack of mention by earlier writers was solely due to the lack of education 113 in Apulia, likely the only region where the disease was common at that time. A nervous disorder that had developed to such a significant degree must have been around for a long time and likely required a complex set of general factors to come about.

The symptoms which followed the bite of venomous spiders were well known to the ancients, and had excited the attention of their best observers, who agree in their descriptions of them. It is probable that among the numerous species of their phalangium[55], the Apulian tarantula is included, but it is difficult to determine this point with certainty, more especially, because in Italy the tarantula was not the only insect which caused this nervous affection, similar results being likewise attributed to the bite of the scorpion. Lividity of the whole body as well as of the countenance, difficulty of speech, tremor of the limbs, icy coldness, pale urine, depression of spirits, headache, a flow of tears, nausea, vomiting, sexual excitement, flatulence, syncope, dysuria, watchfulness, lethargy, even death itself, were cited by them as the consequences of being bitten by venomous spiders, and they made little distinction as to their kinds. To these symptoms we may add the strange rumour, repeated throughout the middle ages, that persons who were bitten, ejected by the bowels and kidneys, and even by vomiting, substances resembling a spider’s web.

The symptoms that followed the bites of venomous spiders were well known to ancient people and caught the attention of their keenest observers, who agreed in their descriptions. It’s likely that among the many species of their phalangium[55], the Apulian tarantula is included, but it's hard to confirm this, especially since in Italy, the tarantula wasn’t the only insect that caused such nervous issues; similar effects were also attributed to scorpion bites. They mentioned symptoms like overall body and facial discoloration, difficulty speaking, shaking limbs, extreme coldness, pale urine, low mood, headaches, excessive tears, nausea, vomiting, sexual arousal, bloating, fainting, painful urination, insomnia, lethargy, and even death as consequences of bites from venomous spiders, showing little distinction among the different kinds. Additionally, there was a strange rumor that persisted throughout the Middle Ages, claiming that those who were bitten expelled substances that looked like spider webs through their bowels, kidneys, and even by vomiting.

Nowhere, however, do we find any mention made that those affected felt an irresistible propensity to dancing, or that they were accidentally cured by it. Even Constantine of Africa, who lived 500 years after Aëtius, and as the most learned physician of the school of Salerno, would certainly not have passed over so acceptable a subject of remark, knows nothing of such a memorable course of this disease arising from poison, and merely repeats the observations of his Greek predecessors[56]. 114Gariopontus[57], a Salernian physician of the eleventh century, was the first to describe a kind of insanity, the remote affinity of which to the tarantula disease is rendered apparent by a very striking symptom. The patients in their sudden attacks behaved like maniacs, sprang up, throwing their arms about with wild movements, and, if perchance a sword was at hand, they wounded themselves and others, so that it became necessary carefully to secure them. They imagined that they heard voices, and various kinds of sounds, and if, during this state of illusion, the tones of a favourite instrument happened to catch their ear, they commenced a spasmodic dance, or ran with the utmost energy which they could muster until they were totally exhausted. These dangerous maniacs, who, it would seem, appeared in considerable numbers, were looked upon as a legion of devils, but on the causes of their malady this obscure writer adds nothing further than that he believes (oddly enough) that it may sometimes be excited by the bite of a mad dog. He calls the disease Anteneasmus, by which is meant no doubt the Enthusiasmus of the Greek physicians[58]. We cite this phenomenon as an important forerunner of Tarantism, under the conviction that we have thus added to the evidence that the development of this latter must have been founded on circumstances which existed from the twelfth to the end of the fourteenth century; for the origin of Tarantism itself is referrible, with the utmost probability, to a period between the middle and the end of this century, and is consequently contemporaneous with that of the St. Vitus’s dance (1374). The influence of the Roman 115Catholic religion, connected as this was, in the middle ages, with the pomp of processions, with public exercises of penance, and with innumerable practices which strongly excited the imaginations of its votaries, certainly brought the mind to a very favourable state for the reception of a nervous disorder. Accordingly, so long as the doctrines of Christianity were blended with so much mysticism, these unhallowed disorders prevailed to an important extent, and even in our own days we find them propagated with the greatest facility where the existence of superstition produces the same effect in more limited districts, as it once did among whole nations. But this is not all. Every country in Europe, and Italy perhaps more than any other, was visited during the middle ages by frightful plagues, which followed each other in such quick succession, that they gave the exhausted people scarcely any time for recovery. The oriental bubo-plague ravaged Italy[59] sixteen times between the years 1119 and 1340. Small-pox and measles were still more destructive than in modern times, and recurred as frequently. St. Anthony’s fire was the dread of town and country; and that disgusting disease, the leprosy, which, in consequence of the crusades, spread its insinuating poison in all directions, snatched from the paternal hearth innumerable victims who, banished from human society, pined away in lonely huts, whither they were accompanied only by the pity of the benevolent and their own despair. All these calamities, of which the moderns have scarcely retained any recollection, were heightened to an incredible degree by the Black Death[60], which spread boundless devastation and misery over Italy. Men’s minds were everywhere morbidly sensitive; and as it happens with individuals whose senses, when they are suffering under anxiety, become more irritable, so that trifles are magnified into objects of great alarm, and slight shocks, which would scarcely affect the spirits when in health, give rise in them to severe diseases, so was it with this whole nation, at all times so alive to emotions, and at that period so sorely pressed with the horrors of death.

Nowhere do we find any mention that those affected felt an overwhelming urge to dance or that they were accidentally cured by it. Even Constantine of Africa, who lived 500 years after Aëtius and was the most knowledgeable doctor from the school of Salerno, certainly would not have overlooked such an intriguing topic, but he knows nothing about this memorable progression of the disease caused by poison and simply repeats the observations of his Greek predecessors[56]. 114Gariopontus[57], a physician from Salerno in the eleventh century, was the first to describe a kind of insanity that resembles the tarantula disease, evident by a very striking symptom. The patients in their sudden episodes acted like maniacs, jumping up and flailing their arms wildly, and if a sword was nearby, they would injure themselves and others, making it necessary to secure them carefully. They believed they heard voices and various sounds, and if, during this state of delusion, they happened to hear the notes of a favorite instrument, they would start a spasmodic dance or run with all the energy they could muster until they were completely worn out. These dangerous individuals, who seemed to appear in large numbers, were viewed as a legion of devils. However, this obscure writer doesn’t add anything further about the causes of their illness, except to weirdly suggest it might sometimes be triggered by the bite of a rabid dog. He calls the disease Anteneasmus, which likely refers to the Enthusiasmus of the Greek doctors[58]. We cite this phenomenon as a significant precursor to Tarantism, believing that we have added to the evidence that the development of this later condition was based on circumstances that existed from the twelfth through the fourteenth century; for the origin of Tarantism itself likely dates between the middle and late part of this century, and thus coincides with the onset of St. Vitus’s dance (1374). The influence of the Roman 115Catholic religion, which during the Middle Ages was connected with grand processions, public acts of penance, and countless rituals that ignited the imaginations of its followers, definitely created a mindset conducive to the development of a nervous disorder. Thus, as long as the doctrines of Christianity were intertwined with so much mysticism, these unholy disorders flourished significantly, and even today, they spread easily where superstition exists, affecting more localized areas as they once did entire nations. But that's not all. Every country in Europe, and especially Italy, faced terrifying plagues during the Middle Ages, which came one after the other so quickly that they gave the worn-out people hardly any time to recover. The oriental bubo-plague devastated Italy[59] sixteen times between 1119 and 1340. Smallpox and measles were even more lethal than today, and occurred just as frequently. St. Anthony’s fire was feared in both cities and countryside; and that repulsive disease, leprosy, which spread its insidious poison due to the Crusades, took countless victims from their homes, leaving them to suffer alone in isolated huts, visited only by the pity of the compassionate and their own despair. All these disasters, which modern people have almost forgotten, were intensified to an incredible degree by the Black Death[60], which caused widespread destruction and suffering across Italy. People’s minds were everywhere overly sensitive; and just as individuals under anxiety become more irritable, causing minor issues to escalate into major concerns, and slight shocks that wouldn’t affect those in good health to provoke severe distress, so was it with this entire nation, always so attuned to emotions and at that time deeply burdened by the fright of death.

The bite of venomous spiders, or rather the unreasonable fear of its consequences, excited at such a juncture, though it could 116not have done so at an earlier period, a violent nervous disorder, which, like St. Vitus’s dance in Germany, spread by sympathy, increasing in severity as it took a wider range, and still further extending its ravages from its long continuance. Thus, from the middle of the fourteenth century, the furies of the Dance brandished their scourge over afflicted mortals; and music, for which the inhabitants of Italy, now probably for the first time, manifested susceptibility and talent, became capable of exciting ecstatic attacks in those affected, and then furnished the magical means of exorcising their melancholy.

The bite of venomous spiders, or more specifically, the irrational fear of its effects, created at this point in time, although it couldn't have at an earlier stage, a severe nervous condition which, like St. Vitus’s dance in Germany, spread through empathy, worsening as it expanded its reach and further escalating its impact due to its prolonged duration. Thus, from the mid-fourteenth century onward, the torments of the Dance loomed over suffering people; and music, for which the people of Italy, likely for the first time, showed a sensitivity and talent, became capable of triggering ecstatic episodes in those afflicted and then provided the magical means to dispel their gloom.

Sect. 3.—Increase.

At the close of the fifteenth century we find that Tarantism had spread beyond the boundaries of Apulia, and that the fear of being bitten by venomous spiders had increased. Nothing short of death itself was expected from the wound which these insects inflicted, and if those who were bitten escaped with their lives, they were said to be seen pining away in a desponding state of lassitude. Many became weak-sighted or hard of hearing, some lost the power of speech, and all were insensible to ordinary causes of excitement. Nothing but the flute or the cithern afforded them relief[61]. At the sound of these instruments they awoke as it were by enchantment, opened their eyes, and moving slowly at first, according to the measure of the music, were, as the time quickened, gradually hurried on to the most passionate dance. It was generally observable that country people, who were rude, and ignorant of music, evinced on these occasions an unusual degree of grace, as if they had been well practised in elegant movements of the body; for it is a peculiarity in nervous disorders of this kind, that the organs of motion are in an altered condition, and are completely under the control of the over-strained spirits. Cities and villages alike resounded throughout the summer season with the notes of fifes, clarinets, and Turkish drums; and patients were everywhere to be met with who looked to dancing as their only remedy. Alexander ab Alexandro[62], who gives this account, saw a young man in a remote 117village who was seized with a violent attack of Tarantism. He listened with eagerness and a fixed stare to the sound of a drum, and his graceful movements gradually became more and more violent, until his dancing was converted into a succession of frantic leaps, which required the utmost exertion of his whole strength. In the midst of this over-strained exertion of mind and body the music suddenly ceased, and he immediately fell powerless to the ground, where he lay senseless and motionless until its magical effect again aroused him to a renewal of his impassioned performances.

At the end of the fifteenth century, we see that Tarantism had spread beyond Apulia, and the fear of being bitten by poisonous spiders had grown. A bite from these insects was thought to threaten death, and if those bitten survived, they were often found languishing in a state of deep fatigue. Many developed vision or hearing problems, some lost their ability to speak, and all were indifferent to typical sources of excitement. Only the sound of the flute or cithern brought them any relief[61]. At the sound of these instruments, they seemed to wake up as if by magic, opened their eyes, and initially moved slowly in time with the music, but as the tempo picked up, they were gradually swept into a frenzied dance. It was often noted that rural people, who were unrefined and lacked musical training, displayed an unexpected elegance in their movements as if they had been well-trained in dance; this is characteristic of nervous disorders, as the body’s movement systems are in a changed state and are entirely controlled by heightened emotions. Cities and villages alike resonated with the sounds of flutes, clarinets, and Turkish drums throughout the summer, and patients could be found everywhere seeking dance as their sole cure. Alexander ab Alexandro[62], who recounts this, witnessed a young man in a remote 117village who experienced a severe episode of Tarantism. He listened intently and with a fixed gaze to the beat of a drum, and his graceful movements gradually intensified into frantic leaps that required all his strength. In the midst of this extreme physical and mental exertion, the music suddenly stopped, and he collapsed to the ground, lying there senseless and motionless until the music’s magical effect roused him once more to continue his impassioned dancing.

At the period of which we are treating there was a general conviction, that by music and dancing the poison of the Tarantula was distributed over the whole body, and expelled through the skin, but that if there remained the slightest vestige of it in the vessels, this became a permanent germ of the disorder, so that the dancing fits might again and again be excited ad infinitum by music. This belief, which resembled the delusion of those insane persons who, being by artful management freed from the imagined causes of their sufferings, are but for a short time released from their false notions, was attended with the most injurious effects: for in consequence of it those affected necessarily became by degrees convinced of the incurable nature of their disorder. They expected relief, indeed, but not a cure, from music; and when the heat of summer awakened a recollection of the dances of the preceding year, they, like the St. Vitus’s dancers of the same period before St. Vitus’s day, again grew dejected and misanthropic, until, by music and dancing, they dispelled the melancholy which had become with them a kind of sensual enjoyment.

At the time we’re discussing, there was a widespread belief that music and dancing spread the venom of the Tarantula throughout the body and pushed it out through the skin. However, if even the smallest trace of it remained in the bloodstream, it became a lasting source of the illness, causing the dancing fits to be triggered repeatedly by music. This belief was similar to the delusions of those who, through clever manipulation, are freed from the imagined causes of their pain but are only briefly liberated from their misconceptions. It had seriously harmful effects: those affected gradually became convinced that their condition was incurable. They hoped for relief but not a cure from music. When the summer heat reminded them of the dances from the previous year, they, like the St. Vitus’s dancers just before St. Vitus’s day, fell into gloom and misanthropy again, until music and dancing helped them shake off the sadness that had oddly become a form of pleasure for them.

Under such favourable circumstances it is clear that Tarantism must every year have made further progress. The number of those affected by it increased beyond all belief, for whoever had either actually been, or even fancied that he had been, once bitten by a poisonous spider or scorpion, made his appearance annually wherever the merry notes of the Tarantella resounded. Inquisitive females joined the throng and caught the disease, not indeed from the poison of the spider, but from the mental poison which they eagerly received through the eye; and thus 118the cure of the Tarantati gradually became established as a regular festival of the populace, which was anticipated with impatient delight.

Under such favorable circumstances, it's clear that Tarantism must have made even more progress each year. The number of people affected by it grew beyond belief, as anyone who had either actually been bitten, or even imagined they had been, by a poisonous spider or scorpion showed up every year wherever the cheerful sounds of the Tarantella played. Curious women joined in and caught the "disease," not from the spider's poison, but from the mental influence they eagerly absorbed through sight; and thus, 118 the cure for the Tarantati gradually became an established festival for the community, which was eagerly anticipated with excitement.

Without attributing more to deception and fraud than to the peculiar nature of a progressive mental malady, it may readily be conceived that the cases of this strange disorder now grew more frequent. The celebrated Matthioli[63], who is worthy of entire confidence, gives his account as an eye-witness. He saw the same extraordinary effects produced by music as Alexandro, for, however tortured with pain, however hopeless of relief the patients appeared, as they lay stretched on the couch of sickness, at the very first sounds of those melodies which made an impression on them—but this was the case only with the Tarantellas composed expressly for the purpose—they sprang up as if inspired with new life and spirit, and, unmindful of their disorder, began to move in measured gestures, dancing for hours together without fatigue, until, covered with a kindly perspiration, they felt a salutary degree of lassitude, which relieved them for a time at least, perhaps even for a whole year, from their dejection and oppressive feeling of general indisposition. Alexandro’s experience of the injurious effects resulting from a sudden cessation of the music was generally confirmed by Matthioli. If the clarinets and drums ceased for a single moment, which, as the most skilful players were tired out by the patients, could not but happen occasionally, they suffered their limbs to fall listless, again sank exhausted to the ground, and could find no solace but in a renewal of the dance. On this account care was taken to continue the music until exhaustion was produced; for it was better to pay a few extra musicians, who might relieve each other, than to permit the patient, in the midst of this curative exercise, to relapse into so deplorable a state of suffering. The attack consequent upon the bite of the Tarantula, Matthioli describes as varying much in its manner. Some became morbidly exhilarated, so that they remained for a long while without sleep, laughing, dancing, and singing in a state of the greatest excitement. Others, on the contrary, were drowsy. The generality felt nausea and suffered from vomiting, and some had constant tremors. Complete mania was no uncommon occurrence, 119not to mention the usual dejection of spirits and other subordinate symptoms.

Without attributing more to trickery and deceit than to the unique nature of a progressive mental illness, it's easy to see that cases of this strange disorder became more common. The well-known Matthioli[63], who can be completely trusted, shares his observations as an eyewitness. He witnessed the same remarkable effects from music as Alexandro did; despite being in pain and seemingly without hope for relief, the patients would spring to life at the first notes of melodies that resonated with them—specifically, the Tarantellas created for this purpose. They would rise as if filled with new energy and, forgetting their illness, start to move in rhythmic gestures, dancing for hours without getting tired, until, covered in a gentle sweat, they experienced a healing sense of fatigue that could lift their spirits and oppressive feelings of illness for a time, perhaps even a whole year. Alexandro’s findings about the harmful effects of abruptly stopping the music were generally supported by Matthioli. If the clarinets and drums paused for even a moment—which, given how tired the best players were from the patients, was bound to happen occasionally—they would let their limbs go limp, collapse back down, and could only find relief by resuming the dance. For this reason, efforts were made to keep the music going until the patients were exhausted; it was preferable to hire a few extra musicians to take turns rather than allow the patient to fall back into a miserable state of suffering during this therapeutic activity. Matthioli describes the reaction to a Tarantula bite as highly variable. Some became overly excited, staying awake for long periods, laughing, dancing, and singing in a state of extreme exhilaration. Others, on the contrary, felt sleepy. Most experienced nausea and vomiting, and some had constant shaking. Severe mania was not uncommon, 119 not to mention the usual feelings of depression and other related symptoms.

Sect. 4.—Idiosyncracies.—Music.

Unaccountable emotions, strange desires and morbid sensual irritations of all kinds, were as prevalent as in the St. Vitus’s dance and similar great nervous maladies. So late as the sixteenth century patients were seen armed with glittering swords which, during the attack, they brandished with wild gestures, as if they were going to engage in a fencing match[64]. Even women scorned all female delicacy[65] and, adopting this impassioned demeanour, did the same; and this phenomenon, as well as the excitement which the Tarantula dancers felt at the sight of any thing with metallic lustre, was quite common up to the period when, in modern times, the disease disappeared[66].

Uncontrollable emotions, bizarre desires, and disturbing physical sensations of all kinds were as common as conditions like St. Vitus’s dance and other serious nervous disorders. As late as the sixteenth century, people were seen wielding shiny swords, which they waved around wildly during episodes, as if preparing for a fencing match[64]. Even women dismissed all notions of feminine delicacy[65] and, adopting this intense attitude, did the same; this phenomenon, along with the excitement Tarantula dancers felt at the sight of anything shiny, was quite common until modern times when the disease eventually faded away[66].

The abhorrence of certain colours and the agreeable sensations produced by others, were much more marked among the excitable Italians than was the case in the St. Vitus’s dance with the more phlegmatic Germans. Red colours, which the St. Vitus’s dancers detested, they generally liked, so that a patient was seldom seen who did not carry a red handkerchief for his gratification, or greedily feast his eyes on any articles of red clothing worn by the bystanders. Some preferred yellow, others black colours, of which an explanation was sought, according to the prevailing notions of the times, in the difference of temperaments[67]. Others again were enraptured with green; and eye-witnesses describe this rage for colours as so extraordinary, that they can scarcely find words with which to express their astonishment. No sooner did the patients obtain a sight of 120the favourite colour than, new as the impression was, they rushed like infuriated animals towards the object, devoured it with their eager looks, kissed and caressed it in every possible way, and gradually resigning themselves to softer sensations, adopted the languishing expression of enamoured lovers, and embraced the handkerchief, or whatever other article it might be, which was presented to them, with the most intense ardour, while the tears streamed from their eyes as if they were completely overwhelmed by the inebriating impression on their senses.

The aversion to certain colors and the pleasant feelings caused by others were much more pronounced among the lively Italians than with the more stoic Germans during St. Vitus's dance. While the St. Vitus's dancers hated red, the Italians generally loved it, so you rarely saw a patient without a red handkerchief for their enjoyment or eagerly looking at any red clothing worn by people around them. Some preferred yellow, others black, with explanations grounded in the popular beliefs of the time regarding different temperaments[67]. Others were captivated by green; witnesses described this obsession with colors as so remarkable that they struggled to find words to convey their amazement. As soon as the patients caught sight of 120their favorite color, they would rush like wild animals toward the source, devouring it with eager eyes, kissing and caressing it in every way possible, and gradually giving in to softer feelings, adopting the dreamy look of love-struck lovers. They would embrace the handkerchief or whatever item was presented to them with intense passion, tears streaming down their faces as if completely overwhelmed by the intoxicating effect on their senses.

The dancing fits of a certain Capuchin friar in Tarentum excited so much curiosity, that Cardinal Cajetano proceeded to the monastery, that he might see with his own eyes what was going on. As soon as the monk, who was in the midst of his dance, perceived the spiritual prince clothed in his red garments, he no longer listened to the Tarantella of the musicians, but with strange gestures endeavoured to approach the Cardinal, as if he wished to count the very threads of his scarlet robe, and to allay his intense longing by its odour. The interference of the spectators, and his own respect, prevented his touching it, and thus the irritation of his senses not being appeased, he fell into a state of such anguish and disquietude, that he presently sank down in a swoon, from which he did not recover until the Cardinal compassionately gave him his cape. This he immediately seized in the greatest ecstacy, and pressed now to his breast, now to his forehead and cheeks, and then again commenced his dance as if in the frenzy of a love fit[68].

The wild dancing of a certain Capuchin friar in Tarentum sparked so much curiosity that Cardinal Cajetano went to the monastery to see for himself what was happening. As soon as the monk, lost in his dance, noticed the spiritual leader in his red robes, he stopped paying attention to the musicians playing the Tarantella. With strange movements, he tried to get closer to the Cardinal, as if he wanted to count the threads of his scarlet robe and satisfy his intense desire with its scent. The crowd's interference and his own sense of respect kept him from touching it, and since he couldn't calm his heightened senses, he fell into such distress and agitation that he collapsed in a swoon. He didn't come to until the Cardinal kindly offered him his cape. The monk immediately grabbed it in pure ecstasy, pressing it against his chest, forehead, and cheeks before resuming his dance as if caught in the frenzy of a love fit[68].

At the sight of colours which they disliked, patients flew into the most violent rage, and, like the St. Vitus’s dancers when they saw red objects, could scarcely be restrained from tearing the clothes of those spectators who raised in them such disagreeable sensations[69].

At the sight of colors they didn’t like, patients became incredibly angry, and, like St. Vitus's dancers when they saw red objects, could barely be held back from ripping the clothes off the spectators who triggered such unpleasant feelings in them.[69]

Another no less extraordinary symptom was the ardent longing for the sea which the patients evinced. As the St. John’s dancers of the fourteenth century saw, in the spirit, the heavens open and display all the splendour of the saints, so did those who were suffering under the bite of the Tarantula feel themselves attracted to the boundless expanse of the blue ocean, and lost themselves in its contemplation. Some songs, which are still preserved, marked this peculiar longing, which was moreover expressed by significant music, and was excited even by the 121bare mention of the sea[70]. Some, in whom this susceptibility was carried to the greatest pitch, cast themselves with blind fury into the blue waves[71], as the St. Vitus’s dancers occasionally did into rapid rivers. This condition, so opposite to the frightful state of hydrophobia, betrayed itself in others only in the pleasure afforded them by the sight of clear water in glasses. These they bore in their hands while dancing, exhibiting at the same time strange movements, and giving way to the most extravagant expressions of their feelings. They were delighted also when, in the midst of the space allotted for this exercise, more ample vessels, filled with water, and surrounded by rushes and water plants, were placed, in which they bathed their heads and arms with evident pleasure[72]. Others there were who rolled about on the ground, and were, by their own desire, buried up to the neck in the earth, in order to alleviate the misery of their condition, not to mention an endless variety of other symptoms which showed the perverted action of the nerves.

Another equally extraordinary symptom was the intense longing for the sea that the patients showed. Just as the St. John’s dancers in the fourteenth century saw, in their visions, the heavens open and reveal all the glory of the saints, those suffering from the bite of the Tarantula felt a strong pull toward the vast expanse of the blue ocean, losing themselves in its contemplation. Some songs, which are still preserved, captured this unusual longing, expressed not only through significant music but also sparked by even the mere mention of the sea121. Some, who felt this urge most intensely, would throw themselves into the blue waves with reckless abandon, much like the St. Vitus’s dancers occasionally did into rushing rivers. This condition, in stark contrast to the terrifying state of hydrophobia, revealed itself in others only by the enjoyment they got from seeing clear water in glasses. They held these glasses while dancing, displaying strange movements and letting loose the most extravagant expressions of their feelings. They were also thrilled when, in the middle of the area designated for this activity, larger vessels filled with water and surrounded by reeds and aquatic plants were set up, allowing them to bathe their heads and arms with clear pleasure. Others rolled around on the ground and, by their own choice, buried themselves up to their necks in the earth to ease the suffering of their condition, not to mention a seemingly endless variety of other symptoms that indicated the disturbed action of their nerves.

All these modes of relief, however, were as nothing in comparison with the irresistible charms of musical sound. Attempts had indeed been made in ancient times to mitigate the pain of sciatica[73], or the paroxysms of mania[74], by the soft melody of the flute, and, what is still more applicable to the present purpose, to remove the danger arising from the bite of vipers[75] by the same means. This, however, was tried only to a very small extent. But after being bitten by the Tarantula, there was, according to popular opinion, no way of saving life except by music, and it was hardly considered as an exception to the general rule, that every now and then the bad effects of a wound were prevented by placing a ligature on the 122bitten limb, or by internal medicine, or that strong persons occasionally withstood the effects of the poison, without the employment of any remedies at all[76]. It was much more common, and is quite in accordance with the nature of so exquisite a nervous disease, to hear accounts of many, who, when bitten by the Tarantula, perished miserably because the Tarantella, which would have afforded them deliverance, was not played to them[77]. It was customary, therefore, so early as the commencement of the seventeenth century, for whole bands of musicians to traverse Italy during the summer months, and, what is quite unexampled either in ancient or modern times, the cure of the Tarantati in the different towns and villages was undertaken on a grand scale. This season of dancing and music was called “the women’s little carnival,”[78] for it was women more especially who conducted the arrangements; so that throughout the whole country they saved up their spare money, for the purpose of rewarding the welcome musicians, and many of them neglected their household employments to participate in this festival of the sick. Mention is even made of one benevolent lady (Mita Lupa) who had expended her whole fortune on this object[79].

All these ways of finding relief, however, were nothing compared to the irresistible allure of music. In ancient times, attempts were made to ease the pain of sciatica[73] or the attacks of mania[74] with the gentle sound of a flute, and even to counteract the danger from snake bites[75] through the same means. However, this was only attempted on a very limited scale. But after being bitten by a Tarantula, it was widely believed that the only way to save a life was through music, and it was rarely seen as an exception to the general idea that sometimes the negative effects of a wound could be managed by tying off the 122 injured limb or with internal medicine, or that strong individuals could occasionally resist the effects of poison without any remedies at all[76]. It was far more common, and very much in line with the nature of such a delicate nervous condition, to hear stories of many people who, when bitten by a Tarantula, suffered terribly because the Tarantella, which could have saved them, was never played for them[77]. Therefore, as early as the beginning of the seventeenth century, it became customary for entire groups of musicians to travel across Italy during the summer months, and what is entirely unprecedented in both ancient and modern times, the treatment of the Tarantati in various towns and villages was carried out on a large scale. This time of dancing and music was referred to as “the women’s little carnival,”[78] as it was mainly women who organized the event; they saved up their extra money to reward the musicians who were welcomed, and many of them neglected their household chores to take part in this festival for the sick. There is even mention of a kind-hearted lady (Mita Lupa) who spent her entire fortune on this cause[79].

The music itself was of a kind perfectly adapted to the nature of the malady, and it made so deep an impression on the Italians, that even to the present time, long since the extinction of the disorder, they have retained the Tarantella, as a particular species of music employed for quick lively dancing. The different kinds of Tarantella were distinguished, very significantly, by particular names, which had reference to the moods observed in the patients. Whence it appears that they aimed at representing by these tunes, even the idiosyncracies of the mind as expressed in the countenance. Thus there was one kind of Tarantella which was called “Panno rosso,” a very lively impassioned style of music, to which wild dithyrambic songs were adapted; another, called “Panno verde,” which was suited to the milder excitement of the senses, caused by green colours, and set to Idyllian songs of verdant fields and shady groves. A third was named “Cinque tempi:” a fourth 123“Moresca,” which was played to a Moorish dance; a fifth, “Catena” and a sixth, with a very appropriate designation, “Spallata,” as if it were only fit to be played to dancers who were lame in the shoulder. This was the slowest and least in vogue of all[80]. For those who loved water they took care to select love songs, which were sung to corresponding music, and such persons delighted in hearing of gushing springs and rushing cascades and streams[81]. It is to be regretted that on this subject we are unable to give any further information, for only small fragments of songs, and a very few Tarantellas, have been preserved, which belong to a period so remote as the beginning of the seventeenth, or at furthest the end of the sixteenth century[82].

The music was perfectly suited to the nature of the illness and left such a strong impression on the Italians that even today, long after the disease has disappeared, they still have the Tarantella, a specific type of music used for lively dancing. Different types of Tarantella were notably distinguished by specific names that referred to the moods seen in the patients. This suggests they aimed to express, through these tunes, the unique mental states reflected in people's faces. For example, one type called “Panno rosso” was a vibrant and passionate style of music, often accompanied by wild, ecstatic songs; another, called “Panno verde,” matched the gentler excitement of the senses related to green colors and was set to idyllic songs about lush fields and shady groves. A third was named “Cinque tempi;” a fourth, “Moresca,” was played for a Moorish dance; a fifth was “Catena,” and a sixth, aptly named “Spallata,” seemed only appropriate for dancers who were lame in the shoulder. This was the slowest and least popular of them all[80]. For those who loved water, they made sure to choose love songs that were sung to corresponding music, and such individuals enjoyed hearing about gushing springs, rushing cascades, and streams[81]. It is unfortunate that we cannot provide more information on this topic, as only small fragments of songs and a very few Tarantellas from as far back as the early seventeenth, or at most the late sixteenth century, have been preserved[82].

The music was almost wholly in the Turkish style (aria Turchesca), and the ancient songs of the peasantry of Apulia, which increased in number annually, were well suited to the abrupt and lively notes of the Turkish drum and the shepherd’s pipe. These two instruments were the favourites in the country, but others of all kinds were played in towns and villages, as an accompaniment to the dances of the patients and the songs of the spectators. If any particular melody was disliked by those affected, they indicated their displeasure by violent gestures expressive of aversion. They could not endure false notes, and it is remarkable that uneducated boors, who had never in their lives manifested any perception of the enchanting power of harmony, acquired, in this respect, an extremely refined sense of hearing, as if they had been initiated into the profoundest secrets of the musical art[83]. It was a matter of every day’s experience, that patients showed a predilection for certain Tarantellas, in preference to others, which gave rise to the composition of a great variety of these dances. They were likewise very capricious in their partialities for particular instruments; so that some longed for the shrill notes of the trumpet, others for the softest music produced by the vibration of strings[84].

The music was almost entirely in the Turkish style (aria Turchesca), and the traditional songs of the rural people in Apulia, which grew in number each year, matched well with the sharp and lively sounds of the Turkish drum and the shepherd’s pipe. These two instruments were favorites in the countryside, but various other instruments were played in towns and villages, accompanying the dances of the patients and the songs of the spectators. If anyone disliked a particular tune, they showed their displeasure through dramatic gestures that expressed their aversion. They couldn’t stand off-key notes, and it’s striking that uneducated peasants, who had never shown an appreciation for the captivating power of harmony, developed an extremely refined sense of hearing in this regard, as if they had been introduced to the deepest secrets of musical art[83]. It was commonly observed that patients preferred certain Tarantellas over others, leading to the creation of a wide variety of these dances. They were also very particular about their favorite instruments; some craved the piercing sounds of the trumpet, while others preferred the gentlest music produced by vibrating strings[84].

Tarantism was at its greatest height in Italy in the seventeenth century, long after the St. Vitus’s Dance of Germany had disappeared. It was not the natives of the country only 124who were attacked by this complaint. Foreigners of every colour and of every race, negroes, gipsies, Spaniards, Albanians, were in like manner affected by it[85]. Against the effects produced by the Tarantula’s bite, or by the sight of the sufferers, neither youth nor age afforded any protection; so that even old men of ninety threw aside their crutches at the sound of the Tarantella, and, as if some magic potion, restorative of youth and vigour, were flowing through their veins, joined the most extravagant dancers[86]. Ferdinando saw a boy five years old seized with the dancing mania[87], in consequence of the bite of a tarantula, and, what is almost past belief, were it not supported by the testimony of so credible an eye-witness, even deaf people were not exempt from this disorder, so potent in its effect was the very sight of those affected, even without the exhilarating emotions caused by music[88].

Tarantism was at its peak in Italy in the seventeenth century, long after the St. Vitus’s Dance in Germany had faded away. It wasn't just the locals who were affected by this condition; people from all backgrounds and races—Black people, gypsies, Spaniards, Albanians—experienced it too124. Neither the young nor the old were spared from the effects of the Tarantula’s bite, or from witnessing those who suffered from it; even ninety-year-old men would toss aside their crutches at the sound of the Tarantella and, as if some magical elixir of youth and energy were coursing through them, they joined in the wild dancing. Ferdinando saw a five-year-old boy overcome by the dancing frenzy due to a tarantula bite, and astonishingly, as supported by the account of a reliable witness, even deaf individuals were not immune to this affliction, so powerful was the visual impact of the afflicted, even without the uplifting influences of music.

Subordinate nervous attacks were much more frequent during this century than at any former period, and an extraordinary icy coldness was observed in those who were the subjects of them; so that they did not recover their natural heat until they had engaged in violent dancing[89]. Their anguish and sense of oppression forced from them a cold perspiration; the secretion from the kidneys was pale[90], and they had so great a dislike to every thing cold, that when water was offered them they pushed it away with abhorrence. Wine, on the contrary, they all drank willingly, without being heated by it, or in the slightest degree intoxicated[91]. During the whole period of the attack they suffered from spasms in the stomach, and felt a disinclination to take food of any kind. They used to abstain some time before the expected seizures from meat and from snails, which they thought rendered them more severe[92], and their great thirst for wine may, therefore, in some measure, be attributable to the want of a more nutritious diet; yet the disorder of the nerves was evidently its chief cause, and the loss of appetite, as well as the necessity for support by wine, were its effects. Loss of 125voice, occasional blindness[93], vertigo, complete insanity, with sleeplessness, frequent weeping without any ostensible cause, were all usual symptoms. Many patients found relief from being placed in swings or rocked in cradles[94]; others required to be roused from their state of suffering by severe blows on the soles of their feet; others beat themselves, without any intention of making a display, but solely for the purpose of allaying the intense nervous irritation which they felt; and a considerable number were seen with their bellies swollen[95], like those of the St. John’s dancers, while the violence of the intestinal disorder was indicated in others by obstinate constipation or diarrhœa and vomiting[96]. These pitiable objects gradually lost their strength and their colour, and creeping about with injected eyes, jaundiced complexions, and inflated bowels, soon fell into a state of profound melancholy, which found food and solace in the solemn tolling of the funeral bell, and in an abode among the tombs of cemeteries, as is related of the Lycanthropes of former times.

Subordinate nervous attacks were much more common during this century than at any time before, and a remarkable icy chill was noticed in those who experienced them; they didn't regain their natural warmth until they engaged in intense dancing[89]. Their suffering and feeling of pressure caused them to sweat coldly; the urine was pale[90], and they had such a strong aversion to anything cold that when water was offered, they pushed it away in disgust. In contrast, they all drank wine eagerly, without it making them hot or slightly tipsy[91]. Throughout the entire episode, they dealt with stomach cramps and felt disinterested in all types of food. They usually avoided meat and snails before expected episodes, believing those made the attacks worse[92], leading to their intense thirst for wine, which might be partly due to the lack of a more nutritious diet; however, the main cause was clearly the nerve disorder, and the loss of appetite along with the need for wine were its consequences. Loss of 125voice, occasional blindness[93], dizziness, complete madness, sleeplessness, and random crying without a clear reason were all typical symptoms. Many patients found relief from being swung or rocked in cradles[94]; others needed to be jolted from their suffering with hard slaps on the soles of their feet; some would hit themselves, not for show, but just to ease the intense nerve irritation they experienced; and a significant number were seen with swollen bellies[95], similar to those of the St. John’s dancers, while others showed signs of severe intestinal issues through persistent constipation or diarrhea and vomiting[96]. These unfortunate individuals gradually lost their strength and color, crawling around with bloodshot eyes, yellowed skin, and bloated stomachs, eventually descending into deep melancholy, which found comfort in the solemn toll of funeral bells and in residing among cemetery tombs, as was said of the Lycanthropes of old.

The persuasion of the inevitable consequences of being bitten by the Tarantula, exercised a dominion over men’s minds which even the healthiest and strongest could not shake off. So late as the middle of the sixteenth century, the celebrated Fracastoro found the robust bailiff of his landed estate groaning, and, with the aspect of a person in the extremity of despair, suffering the very agonies of death, from a sting in the neck, inflicted by an insect which was believed to be a Tarantula. He kindly administered without delay, a potion of vinegar and Armenian bole, the great remedy of those days for the plague and all kinds of animal poisons, and the dying man was, as if by a miracle, restored to life and the power of speech[97]. Now, since it is quite out of the question that the bole could have any thing to do with the result in this case, notwithstanding Fracastoro’s belief in its virtues, we can only account for the cure by supposing, that a confidence in so great a physician prevailed over this fatal disease of the imagination, which would otherwise have yielded to scarcely any other remedy except the Tarantella. Ferdinando was acquainted with women who, for thirty years in succession, had overcome the attacks of this disorder 126by a renewal of their annual dance—so long did they maintain their belief in the yet undestroyed poison of the Tarantula’s bite, and so long did that mental affection continue to exist, after it had ceased to depend on any corporeal excitement[98].

The fear of the inevitable consequences of being bitten by the Tarantula had a grip on people's minds that even the healthiest and strongest couldn't shake off. As late as the mid-sixteenth century, the well-known Fracastoro found the strong bailiff of his estate groaning and looking like someone in utter despair, suffering terribly from a sting in the neck, supposedly from an insect believed to be a Tarantula. He quickly administered a potion of vinegar and Armenian bole, the main remedy of those times for the plague and various animal poisons, and the dying man was, as if by miracle, brought back to life and regained his ability to speak[97]. Since it's impossible that the bole had anything to do with the outcome in this case, despite Fracastoro’s faith in its effectiveness, we can only explain the recovery by suggesting that confidence in such a great physician overcame this deadly imaginative illness, which would otherwise have succumbed to hardly any other remedy except the Tarantella. Ferdinando knew women who, for thirty years in a row, managed to fend off the attacks of this disorder 126 by repeating their annual dance—so enduring was their belief in the still potent poison of the Tarantula’s bite, and so long did this mental condition persist after it was no longer tied to any physical trigger[98].

Wherever we turn we find that this morbid state of mind prevailed, and was so supported by the opinions of the age, that it needed only a stimulus in the bite of the Tarantula, and the supposed certainty of its very disastrous consequences, to originate this violent nervous disorder. Even in Ferdinando’s time there were many who altogether denied the poisonous effects of the Tarantula’s bite, whilst they considered the disorder, which annually set Italy in commotion, to be a melancholy depending on the imagination[99]. They dearly expiated this scepticism, however, when they were led, with an inconsiderate hardihood, to test their opinions by experiment; for many of them became the subjects of severe Tarantism, and even a distinguished prelate, Jo. Baptist Quinzato, Bishop of Foligno, having allowed himself, by way of a joke, to be bitten by a Tarantula, could obtain a cure in no other way than by being, through the influence of the Tarentella, compelled to dance[100]. Others among the clergy, who wished to shut their ears against music, because they considered dancing derogatory to their station, fell into a dangerous state of illness by thus delaying the crisis of the malady, and were obliged at last to save themselves from a miserable death by submitting to the unwelcome but sole means of cure[101]. Thus it appears that the age was so little favourable to freedom of thought, that even the most decided sceptics, incapable of guarding themselves against the recollection of what had been presented to the eye, were subdued by a poison, the powers of which they had ridiculed, and which was in itself inert in its effect.

Wherever we look, we see that this grim state of mind was widespread and supported by the beliefs of the time. It took just the trigger of a Tarantula's bite and the supposed certainty of its disastrous consequences to bring on this intense nervous disorder. Even in Ferdinando’s time, many completely denied the poisonous effects of a Tarantula’s bite, believing the disorder that stirred commotion across Italy every year was simply a melancholy rooted in imagination[99]. However, they paid dearly for this skepticism when they carelessly decided to test their beliefs, as many became victims of severe Tarantism. Even a notable bishop, Jo. Baptist Quinzato, Bishop of Foligno, jokingly allowed himself to be bitten by a Tarantula and couldn’t be cured except by being forced to dance through the influence of the Tarentella[100]. Others in the clergy, who tried to ignore music because they thought dancing was beneath their position, ended up seriously ill by delaying the crisis of the disorder. In the end, they had to resort to the unpleasant but only means of healing to avoid a miserable death[101]. Thus, it’s clear that the era was hardly supportive of free thought, as even the staunchest skeptics, unable to dismiss the memories of what they had seen, were overcome by a poison they had mocked, which was, in reality, harmless in its effects.

Sect. 5.—Hysteria.

Different characteristics of morbidly excited vitality having been rendered prominent by Tarantism in different individuals, it could not but happen that other derangements of the nerves would assume the form of this, whenever circumstances favoured 127such a transition. This was more especially the case with hysteria, that proteiform and mutable disorder, in which the imaginations, the superstitions and the follies of all ages have been evidently reflected. The “Carnevaletto delle Donne” appeared most opportunely for those who were hysterical. Their disease received from it, as it had at other times from other extraordinary customs, a peculiar direction; so that whether bitten by the tarantula or not, they felt compelled to participate in the dances of those affected, and to make their appearance at this popular festival, where they had an opportunity of triumphantly exhibiting their sufferings. Let us here pause to consider the kind of life which the women in Italy led. Lonely, and deprived by cruel custom of social intercourse, that fairest of all enjoyments, they dragged on a miserable existence. Cheerfulness and an inclination to sensual pleasures passed into compulsory idleness, and, in many, into black despondency[102]. Their imaginations became disordered—a pallid countenance and oppressed respiration bore testimony to their profound sufferings. How could they do otherwise, sunk as they were in such extreme misery, than seize the occasion to burst forth from their prisons, and alleviate their miseries by taking part in the delights of music. Nor should we here pass unnoticed a circumstance 128which illustrates, in a remarkable degree, the psychological nature of hysterical sufferings, namely, that many chlorotic females, by joining the dancers at the Carnevaletto, were freed from their spasms and oppression of breathing for the whole year, although the corporeal cause of their malady was not removed[103]. After such a result, no one could call their self-deception a mere imposture, and unconditionally condemn it as such.

Different traits of intensely excited vitality, highlighted by Tarantism in various individuals, led to the inevitable conclusion that other nerve disturbances would take on this form whenever the conditions allowed for such a shift. This was particularly true for hysteria, that ever-changing and varied disorder, reflecting the imaginations, superstitions, and follies of all times. The "Carnevaletto delle Donne" happened to be especially beneficial for those who were hysterical. Their condition drew a unique focus from it, just as it had from other unusual customs in the past, so that whether they were bitten by the tarantula or not, they felt an irresistible urge to join in the dances of those affected and to show up at this popular festival, where they could proudly display their sufferings. Let’s take a moment to think about the kind of life women in Italy lived. Isolated and deprived of social interaction by harsh customs, they led a miserable existence. Joy and the desire for pleasure turned into forced idleness, and for many, into deep despair. Their imaginations became unhinged—a pale complexion and labored breathing indicated their profound suffering. How could they do anything but seize the chance to break free from their confinement and ease their misery through the pleasures of music? We also shouldn’t overlook a particular circumstance that notably illustrates the psychological nature of hysterical suffering, which is that many anemic women, by joining the dancers at the Carnevaletto, were relieved of their spasms and breathing difficulties for an entire year, even though the physical cause of their illness had not been addressed. After such an outcome, no one could dismiss their self-deception as a mere trick and condemn it outright.

This numerous class of patients certainly contributed not a little to the maintenance of the evil, for their fantastic sufferings, in which dissimulation and reality could scarcely be distinguished even by themselves, much less by their physicians, were imitated, in the same way as the distortions of the St. Vitus’s dancers, by the impostors of that period. It was certainly by these persons also that the number of subordinate symptoms was increased to an endless extent, as may be conceived from the daily observation of hysterical patients, who, from a morbid desire to render themselves remarkable, deviate from the laws of moral propriety. Powerful sexual excitement had often the most decided influence over their condition. Many of them exposed themselves in the most indecent manner, tore their hair out by the roots, with howling and gnashing of their teeth; and when, as was sometimes the case, their unsatisfied passion hurried them on to a state of frenzy, they closed their existence by self-destruction; it being common at that time for these unfortunate beings to precipitate themselves into the wells[104].

This large group of patients definitely played a significant role in sustaining the problem, as their dramatic suffering, where it was almost impossible to tell what was fake and what was real—even for them—was mimicked, similar to the movements of St. Vitus’s dancers, by the fakers of that time. It was certainly by these people that the list of related symptoms grew to an endless length, as seen in the daily observations of hysterical patients who, driven by a sick desire to stand out, acted against the standards of moral behavior. Intense sexual excitement often greatly influenced their condition. Many engaged in extremely inappropriate behavior, ripped their hair out by the roots while screaming and grinding their teeth; and when, as sometimes happened, their unfulfilled desires pushed them into madness, they ended their lives by suicide, as it was not uncommon for these unfortunate souls to throw themselves into wells[104].

It might hence seem that, owing to the conduct of patients of this description, so much of fraud and falsehood would be mixed up with the original disorder, that having passed into another complaint, it must have been itself destroyed. This, however, did not happen in the first half of the seventeenth century; for as a clear proof that Tarantism remained substantially the same and quite unaffected by Hysteria, there were in many places, and in particular at Messapia, fewer women affected than men, who in their turn were, in no small proportion, led into temptation by sexual excitement[105]. In other places, as for example at Brindisi, the case was reversed, which 129may, as in other complaints, be in some measure attributable to local causes. Upon the whole it appears, from concurrent accounts, that women by no means enjoyed the distinction of being attacked by Tarantism more frequently than men.

It might seem that, because of the behavior of patients like this, a lot of fraud and deception would be mixed in with the original condition, making it seem like the original issue had been completely erased after evolving into a different complaint. However, this didn’t occur in the first half of the seventeenth century; as clear evidence that Tarantism stayed basically the same and wasn’t influenced by Hysteria, there were in many areas, especially in Messapia, fewer women affected than men, who were often tempted by sexual excitement[105]. In other places, like Brindisi, it was the opposite, which 129 may, like in other conditions, be somewhat due to local factors. Overall, it seems, from various reports, that women were not more likely than men to be affected by Tarantism.

It is said that the cicatrix of the tarantula bite, on the yearly or half-yearly return of the fit, became discoloured[106], but on this point the distinct testimony of good observers is wanting to deprive the assertion of its utter improbability.

It is said that the scar from the tarantula bite, during the annual or semiannual occurrence of the attack, became discolored[106], but there is a lack of clear evidence from credible observers to make this claim completely unlikely.

It is not out of place to remark here, that about the same time that Tarantism attained its greatest height in Italy, the bite of venomous spiders was more feared in distant parts of Asia likewise, than it had ever been within the memory of man. There was this difference, however, that the symptoms supervening on the occurrence of this accident were not accompanied by the Apulian nervous disorder, which, as has been shown in the foregoing pages, had its origin rather in the melancholic temperament of the inhabitants of the south of Italy, than in the nature of the tarantula poison itself. This poison is therefore doubtless to be considered only as a remote cause of the complaint, which, but for that temperament, would be inadequate to its production. The Persians employed a very rough means of counteracting the bad consequences of a poison of this sort. They drenched the wounded person with milk, and then, by violent rotatory motion in a suspended box, compelled him to vomit[107].

It's worth mentioning that around the same time Tarantism peaked in Italy, people in far-off parts of Asia also grew more afraid of poisonous spider bites than they had been in living memory. However, there was a key difference: the symptoms following this incident were not accompanied by the Apulian nervous disorder, which, as previously discussed, stemmed more from the melancholic temperament of southern Italians than from the nature of the tarantula's venom itself. Thus, this venom should be seen as just a distant cause of the issue, which, without that temperament, wouldn't lead to such effects. The Persians used a rather crude method to counteract the bad effects of this type of poison. They soaked the injured person in milk and then, through violent spinning in a suspended box, induced vomiting.[107].

Sect. 6.—Decrease.

The Dancing Mania, arising from the tarantula bite, continued, with all those additions of self-deception, and of the dissimulation which is such a constant attendant on nervous disorders of this kind, through the whole course of the seventeenth century. It was indeed gradually on the decline, but up to the termination of this period, showed such extraordinary symptoms, that Baglivi, one of the best physicians of that time, thought he did a service to science by making them the subject of a dissertation[108]. He repeats all the observations of Ferdinando, and 130supports his own assertions by the experience of his father, a physician at Lecce, whose testimony, as an eye-witness, may be admitted as unexceptionable[109].

The Dancing Mania, which came from a tarantula bite, persisted, along with all the elements of self-deception and the dishonesty that often accompany nervous disorders like this, throughout the seventeenth century. While it was gradually declining, even by the end of this period, it displayed such remarkable symptoms that Baglivi, one of the leading physicians of that time, believed he was contributing to science by writing a dissertation on it[108]. He included all of Ferdinando's observations and 130backed up his own claims with the experience of his father, a physician in Lecce, whose firsthand account can be considered reliable[109].

The immediate consequences of the tarantula bite, the supervening nervous disorder, and the aberrations and fits of those who suffered from Hysteria, he describes in a masterly style, nor does he ever suffer his credulity to diminish the authenticity of his account, of which he has been unjustly accused by later writers.

The immediate effects of the tarantula bite, the subsequent nervous disorder, and the strange behaviors and seizures of those who experienced hysteria are described in a skillful way, and he never lets his belief in the supernatural undermine the truth of his account, despite being unfairly criticized by later writers.

Finally, Tarantism has declined more and more in modern times, and is now limited to single cases. How could it possibly have maintained itself unchanged in the eighteenth century, when all the links which connected it with the middle ages had long since been snapped asunder? Imposture[110] grew more frequent, 131and wherever the disease still appeared in its genuine form, its chief cause, namely, a peculiar cast of melancholy, which formerly had been the temperament of thousands, was now possessed only occasionally by unfortunate individuals. It might therefore not unreasonably be maintained, that the Tarantism of modern times bears nearly the same relation to the original malady, as the St. Vitus’s dance which still exists, and certainly has all along existed, bears, in certain cases, to the original dancing mania of the dancers of St. John.

Finally, Tarantism has declined more and more in modern times and is now limited to isolated cases. How could it have possibly stayed the same in the eighteenth century when all the connections to the Middle Ages had long been broken? Deception grew more common, 131 and wherever the disease still appeared in its true form, its main cause, a unique kind of melancholy that used to characterize thousands, was now only occasionally found in unfortunate individuals. It might therefore be reasonable to say that modern Tarantism is nearly as related to the original illness as St. Vitus's dance, which still exists and certainly has always existed, is to the original dancing mania of the dancers of St. John.

To conclude. Tarantism, as a real disease, has been denied in toto, and stigmatized as an imposition, by most physicians and naturalists, who in this controversy have shown the narrowness of their views and their utter ignorance of history. In order to support their opinion they have instituted some experiments, apparently favourable to it, but under circumstances altogether inapplicable, since, for the most part, they selected, as the subjects of them, none but healthy men, who were totally uninfluenced by a belief in this once so dreaded disease. From individual instances of fraud and dissimulation, such as are found in connexion with most nervous affections without rendering their reality a matter of any doubt, they drew a too hasty conclusion respecting the general phenomenon, of which they appeared not to know, that it had continued for nearly four hundred years, having originated in the remotest periods of the middle ages. The most learned and the most acute among these sceptics is Serao the Neapolitan[111]. His reasonings amount 132to this, that he considers the disease to be a very marked form of melancholia, and compares the effect of the tarantula bite upon it to stimulating, with spurs, a horse which is already running. The reality of that effect he thus admits, and therefore directly confirms what in appearance only he denies[112]. By shaking the already vacillating belief in this disorder he is said to have actually succeeded in rendering it less frequent, and in setting bounds to imposture[113]; but this no more disproves the reality of its existence, than the oft-repeated detection of imposition has been able, in modern times, to banish magnetic sleep from the circle of natural phenomena, though such detection has, on its side, rendered more rare the incontestible effects of animal magnetism. Other physicians and naturalists[114] have delivered their 133sentiments on Tarantism, but as they have not possessed an enlarged knowledge of its history, their views do not merit particular exposition. It is sufficient for the comprehension of every one, that we have presented the facts freed from all extraneous speculation.

To wrap up, tarantism, as a genuine illness, has been completely denied and labeled as a fraud by most doctors and naturalists, who in this debate have revealed their limited perspectives and complete ignorance of history. To back up their stance, they conducted some experiments that seemed to support it, but under completely irrelevant conditions, selecting only healthy individuals who were unaffected by the belief in this once terrifying disease. From individual cases of trickery and deception, common in many nervous conditions, they jumped to a hasty conclusion about the overall phenomenon, failing to realize that it had persisted for nearly four hundred years, originating in the distant periods of the Middle Ages. The most knowledgeable and perceptive among these skeptics is Serao from Naples. His arguments boil down to the idea that he views the disease as a distinct form of melancholia, comparing the effect of a tarantula bite to spurring a horse that is already racing. By doing this, he acknowledges the reality of that effect, thereby confirming what he only superficially denies. By shaking the already wavering belief in this disorder, it is said that he has actually managed to make it less common and limit deceit; however, this does not disprove the reality of its existence, just as the frequent exposure of fraud has not been able, in modern times, to eliminate magnetic sleep from natural phenomena, even though such exposure has made the undeniable effects of animal magnetism rarer. Other doctors and naturalists have shared their thoughts on tarantism, but since they lack a deep understanding of its history, their opinions don't merit detailed discussion. It's enough for everyone to understand that we have presented the facts without any unrelated speculation.


CHAPTER III.
Dancing craze in Abyssinia.

Sect. 1.—Tigretier.

Both the St. Vitus’s dance and Tarantism belonged to the ages in which they appeared. They could not have existed under the same latitude at any other epoch, for at no other period were the circumstances which prepared the way for them combined in a similar relation to each other, and the mental as well as corporeal temperaments of nations, which depend on causes such as have been stated, are as little capable of renewal as the different stages of life in individuals. This gives so much the more importance to a disease but cursorily alluded to in the foregoing pages, which exists in Abyssinia, and which nearly resembles the original mania of the St. John’s dancers, inasmuch as it exhibits a perfectly similar ecstacy, with the same violent effect on the nerves of motion. It occurs most frequently in the Tigrè country, being thence called Tigretier, and is probably the same malady which is called in the Æthiopian language 134Astarāgaza[115]. On this subject we will introduce the testimony of Nathaniel Pearce[116], an eye-witness, who resided nine years in Abyssinia. “The Tigretier,” says he, “is more common among the women than among the men. It seizes the body as if with a violent fever, and from that turns to a lingering sickness, which reduces the patients to skeletons, and often kills them, if the relations cannot procure the proper remedy. During this sickness their speech is changed to a kind of stuttering, which no one can understand but those afflicted with the same disorder. When the relations find the malady to be the real tigretier, they join together to defray the expenses of curing it; the first remedy they in general attempt, is to procure the assistance of a learned Dofter, who reads the Gospel of St. John[117], and drenches the patient with cold water daily for the space of seven days—an application that very often proves fatal. The most effectual cure, though far more expensive than the former, is as follows:—The relations hire, for a certain sum of money, a band of trumpeters, drummers and fifers, and buy a quantity of liquor; then all the young men and women of the place assemble at the patient’s house, to perform the following most extraordinary ceremony.

Both St. Vitus’s dance and Tarantism were products of their time. They couldn't have existed under the same conditions in any other era, because no other time combined the circumstances that led to them in the same way. The mindset and physical states of nations, which depend on the causes mentioned, are as unchangeable as the different stages of life in individuals. This highlights the significance of a condition briefly mentioned earlier, which occurs in Abyssinia and closely resembles the original mania of the St. John’s dancers, as it shows a similar ecstasy and has the same intense effect on the nervous system. It is most common in the Tigrè region, hence it’s called Tigretier, and is probably the same illness referred to in the Ethiopian language as 134Astarāgaza[115]. Regarding this, we will include the account of Nathaniel Pearce[116], an eyewitness who lived in Abyssinia for nine years. “The Tigretier,” he says, “is more prevalent among women than men. It strikes the body as if with a severe fever, which then leads to a long-lasting illness that can leave patients emaciated and often leads to death if their families can't find the right treatment. During this sickness, their speech becomes a form of stuttering that only those with the same disorder can understand. When families realize the illness is the real tigretier, they come together to cover the cost of treatment; typically, the first step is to seek help from a knowledgeable Dofter, who reads the Gospel of St. John[117] and drenches the patient with cold water daily for seven days—an approach that often proves fatal. The most effective cure, though much more costly than the previous one, involves hiring a group of trumpeters, drummers, and fifers for a set amount of money, along with buying a quantity of liquor. Then, all the young men and women from the area gather at the patient’s house to carry out a truly extraordinary ceremony.

“I was once called in by a neighbour to see his wife, a very young woman, who had the misfortune to be afflicted with this disorder; and the man being an old acquaintance of mine, and always a close comrade in the camp, I went every day when at home to see her, but I could not be of any service to her, though she never refused my medicines. At this time, I could not understand a word she said, although she talked very freely, nor could any of her relations understand her. She could not bear the sight of a book or a priest, for at the sight of either, she struggled, and was apparently seized with acute agony, and 135a flood of tears, like blood mingled with water, would pour down her face from her eyes. She had lain three months in this lingering state, living upon so little that it seemed not enough to keep a human body alive; at last, her husband agreed to employ the usual remedy, and, after preparing for the maintenance of the band, during the time it would take to effect the cure, he borrowed from all his neighbours their silver ornaments, and loaded her legs, arms, and neck with them.

“I was once called by a neighbor to check on his wife, a very young woman, who was unfortunately suffering from this condition. Since the man was an old friend and always a close buddy in the camp, I visited her every day when I was home, but I couldn't help her, even though she never turned down my medications. At that time, I couldn't understand a word she said, even though she spoke quite freely, and neither could any of her family. She couldn’t stand the sight of a book or a priest; just seeing either would make her struggle, and she would seem to be in severe pain, with a stream of tears—like blood mixed with water—pouring down her face. She had been in this lingering state for three months, subsisting on so little it seemed barely enough to keep her alive. Eventually, her husband agreed to try the usual remedy. After making arrangements for the band’s upkeep during the cure, he borrowed silver ornaments from all his neighbors and covered her legs, arms, and neck with them. 135

“The evening that the band began to play, I seated myself close by her side as she lay upon the couch, and about two minutes after the trumpets had begun to sound, I observed her shoulders begin to move, and soon afterwards her head and breast, and in less than a quarter of an hour, she sat upon her couch. The wild look she had, though sometimes she smiled, made me draw off to a greater distance, being almost alarmed to see one nearly a skeleton move with such strength: her head, neck, shoulders, hands and feet, all made a strong motion to the sound of the music, and in this manner she went on by degrees, until she stood up on her legs upon the floor. Afterwards she began to dance, and at times to jump about, and at last, as the music and noise of the singers increased, she often sprang three feet from the ground. When the music slackened, she would appear quite out of temper, but when it became louder, she would smile and be delighted. During this exercise, she never showed the least symptom of being tired, though the musicians were thoroughly exhausted; and when they stopped to refresh themselves by drinking and resting a little, she would discover signs of discontent.

"The evening the band started playing, I settled in close to her on the couch. About two minutes after the trumpets kicked off, I noticed her shoulders start to move, and shortly after that, her head and chest followed. In less than fifteen minutes, she was sitting up. The wild look in her eyes, though she occasionally smiled, made me step back a bit, feeling almost alarmed to see someone who was nearly a skeleton move with such energy. Her head, neck, shoulders, hands, and feet all moved powerfully to the music, and gradually, she stood up on the floor. Then she began to dance, sometimes even jumping around, and eventually, as the music and singers got livelier, she often leaped three feet off the ground. When the music slowed down, she seemed quite upset, but when it got louder, she smiled and lit up with joy. Throughout this whole time, she never showed any signs of being tired, even though the musicians were completely worn out; when they took a break to drink and rest, she would visibly show her disappointment."

“Next day, according to the custom in the cure of this disorder, she was taken into the market-place, where several jars of maize or tsug were set in order by the relations, to give drink to the musicians and dancers. When the crowd had assembled and the music was ready, she was brought forth and began to dance and throw herself into the maddest postures imaginable, and in this manner she kept on the whole day. Towards evening, she began to let fall her silver ornaments from her neck, arms, and legs, one at a time, so that, in the course of three hours, she was stripped of every article. A relation continually kept going after her as she danced, to pick up the ornaments, and afterwards delivered them to the owners from whom they were borrowed. As the sun went down, she136 made a start with such swiftness, that the fastest runner could not come up with her, and when at the distance of about two hundred yards, she dropped on a sudden, as if shot. Soon afterwards, a young man, on coming up with her, fired a matchlock over her body, and struck her upon the back with the broad side of his large knife, and asked her name, to which she answered as when in her common senses—a sure proof of her being cured; for, during the time of this malady, those afflicted with it never answer to their Christian names. She was now taken up in a very weak condition and carried home, and a priest came and baptized her again in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, which ceremony concluded her cure. Some are taken in this manner to the market-place for many days before they can be cured, and it sometimes happens that they cannot be cured at all. I have seen them in these fits dance with a bruly, or bottle of maize, upon their heads, without spilling the liquor, or letting the bottle fall, although they have put themselves into the most extravagant postures.

“Next day, following the tradition for treating this condition, she was brought to the marketplace, where several jars of maize or tsug were arranged by her family to provide drinks for the musicians and dancers. Once the crowd gathered and the music started, she was brought out and began dancing, throwing herself into the wildest poses imaginable, and she continued like this all day. As evening approached, she started dropping her silver jewelry from her neck, arms, and legs, one piece at a time, until, over the course of three hours, she was left without any. A relative kept running after her while she danced, picking up the dropped jewelry and eventually returning it to the owners from whom it had been borrowed. When the sun began to set, she took off so fast that no runner could catch her, and about two hundred yards away, she suddenly collapsed as if shot. Shortly after, a young man reached her, fired a matchlock over her body, and struck her on the back with the flat side of his large knife, then asked her name. She responded as if she were in her right mind—definitive proof that she had been cured; during this illness, those affected do not respond to their Christian names. She was then picked up in a very weak state and taken home, and a priest came to baptize her again in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, which marked the end of her treatment. Some individuals are taken to the marketplace like this for many days before they can recover, and sometimes they can’t be cured at all. I have seen people in these episodes dance with a bruly, or bottle of maize, on their heads, not spilling any drink or dropping the bottle, even while contorting into the most outrageous positions.”

“I could not have ventured to write this from hearsay, nor could I conceive it possible, until I was obliged to put this remedy in practice upon my own wife[118], who was seized with the same disorder, and then I was compelled to have a still nearer view of this strange disorder. I at first thought that a whip would be of some service, and one day attempted a few strokes when unnoticed by any person, we being by ourselves, and I having a strong suspicion that this ailment sprang from the weak minds of women, who were encouraged in it for the sake of the grandeur, rich dress, and music which accompany the cure. But how much was I surprised, the moment I struck a light blow, thinking to do good, to find that she became like a corpse, and even the joints of her fingers became so stiff that I could not straighten them; indeed, I really thought that she was dead, and immediately made it known to the people in the house that she had fainted, but did not tell them the cause, upon which they immediately brought music, which I had for many days denied them, and which soon revived her; and I then left the house to her relations to cure her at my expense, in the manner I have before mentioned, though it took a much longer time to cure my wife than the woman I have just given an account of. One day I went privately, with a companion, to 137see my wife dance, and kept at a short distance, as I was ashamed to go near the crowd. On looking stedfastly upon her, while dancing or jumping more like a deer than a human being, I said that it certainly was not my wife; at which my companion burst into a fit of laughter, from which he could scarcely refrain all the way home. Men are sometimes afflicted with this dreadful disorder, but not frequently. Among the Amhara and Galla it is not so common.”

“I couldn’t have brought myself to write this based on rumors, nor did I think it could be possible until I had to use this remedy on my own wife[118], who was struck by the same illness. That’s when I was forced to take a closer look at this strange condition. At first, I thought a whip might help, and one day I tried giving her a few light strokes when no one was watching, just the two of us. I had a strong suspicion that this issue originated from the fragile minds of women, who were encouraged by the allure of the grandeur, fancy clothes, and music that come with the treatment. But I was shocked when, after giving her a light hit, thinking I was helping, she became totally unresponsive, almost like a corpse, and even her fingers stiffened to the point I couldn’t straighten them; I genuinely thought she was dead. I quickly informed the people in the house that she had fainted, but I didn’t tell them the reason. They immediately brought in music, which I had previously denied them, and it quickly revived her. I then left her in the care of her relatives for them to treat her at my expense, in the way I mentioned before, even though it took much longer to heal my wife than the woman I just described. One day, I stealthily went with a friend to 137watch my wife dance, keeping a distance since I was embarrassed to be near the crowd. As I stared at her, dancing like a deer rather than a person, I said it couldn’t possibly be my wife; my companion couldn’t help but burst into laughter, struggling to contain himself all the way home. Sometimes, men experience this terrible disorder, but it’s rare. Among the Amhara and Galla, it isn’t that common.”

Such is the account of Pearce, who is every way worthy of credit, and whose lively description renders the traditions of former times respecting the St. Vitus’s dance and Tarantism intelligible even to those who are sceptical respecting the existence of a morbid state of the mind and body of the kind described, because, in the present advanced state of civilization among the nations of Europe, opportunities for its development no longer occur. The credibility of this energetic, but by no means ambitious man, is not liable to the slightest suspicion, for, owing to his want of education, he had no knowledge of the phenomenon in question, and his work evinces throughout his attractive and unpretending impartiality.

This is the account of Pearce, who is completely trustworthy and whose vivid description makes the old traditions about St. Vitus's dance and Tarantism clear, even to those who doubt the existence of such a disturbed state of mind and body. This skepticism arises because, in today's advanced civilization in Europe, there are no longer opportunities for such conditions to develop. The credibility of this energetic, yet modest man is beyond question, as his lack of formal education meant he had no prior knowledge of the phenomenon he described, and his work consistently shows his engaging and unpretentious neutrality.

Comparison is the mother of observation, and may here elucidate one phenomena by another—the past by that which still exists. Oppression, insecurity, and the influence of a very rude priestcraft, are the powerful causes which operated on the Germans and Italians of the middle ages, as they now continue to operate on the Abyssinians of the present day. However these people may differ from us in their descent, their manners and their customs, the effects of the above-mentioned causes are the same in Africa as they were in Europe, for they operate on man himself independently of the particular locality in which he may be planted; and the condition of the Abyssinians of modern times is, in regard to superstition, a mirror of the condition of the European nations in the middle ages. Should this appear a bold assertion, it will be strengthened by the fact, that in Abyssinia, two examples of superstitions occur, which are completely in accordance with occurrences of the middle ages that took place contemporarily with the dancing mania. The Abyssinians have their Christian flagellants, and there exists among them a belief in a Zoomorphism, which presents a lively image of the lycanthropy of the middle ages. Their flagellants are called Zackarys. They are united into a separate Christian138 fraternity, and make their processions through the towns and villages with great noise and tumult, scourging themselves till they draw blood, and wounding themselves with knives[119]. They boast that they are descendants of St. George. It is precisely in Tigrè, the country of the Abyssinian dancing mania, where they are found in the greatest numbers, and where they have, in the neighbourhood of Axum, a church of their own, dedicated to their patron saint Oun Arvel. Here there is an ever-burning lamp, and they contrive to impress a belief that this is kept alight by supernatural means. They also here keep a holy water, which is said to be a cure for those who are affected by the dancing mania.

Comparison is the key to understanding, and can clarify one phenomenon through another—the past through what still exists today. Oppression, insecurity, and the impact of a very harsh religious authority were powerful forces affecting the Germans and Italians in the Middle Ages, just as they continue to impact the Abyssinians today. Regardless of how these people differ from us in their ancestry, customs, and behaviors, the effects of these aforementioned causes are the same in Africa as they were in Europe, as they affect people themselves regardless of their location; thus, the state of modern Abyssinians in terms of superstition mirrors that of European nations in the Middle Ages. If this seems like a bold claim, it is supported by the fact that in Abyssinia, there are two examples of superstitions that align perfectly with events from the Middle Ages that happened around the same time as the dancing mania. The Abyssinians have their Christian flagellants, and there is among them a belief in Zoomorphism, which vividly reflects the lycanthropy of the Middle Ages. Their flagellants are called Zackarys. They are part of a distinct Christian138 fraternity, and they march through towns and villages with much noise and chaos, whipping themselves until they bleed and injuring themselves with knives[119]. They claim to be descendants of St. George. They are most numerous in Tigrè, the region known for the Abyssinian dancing mania, where they have a church dedicated to their patron saint Oun Arvel near Axum. Here, there’s a constantly burning lamp, and they manage to foster the belief that it stays lit by supernatural means. They also maintain holy water here, said to cure those afflicted by the dancing mania.

The Abyssinian Zoomorphism is a no less important phenomenon, and shows itself in a manner quite peculiar. The blacksmiths and potters form, among the Abyssinians, a society, or caste called in Tigrè Tebbib, and in Amhara Buda, which is held in some degree of contempt, and excluded from the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper, because it is believed that they can change themselves into hyænas and other beasts of prey, on which account they are feared by every body, and regarded with horror. They artfully contrive to keep up this superstition, because by this separation they preserve a monopoly of their lucrative trades, and as in other respects they are good Christians, (but few Jews or Mahomedans live among them,) they seem to attach no great consequence to their excommunication. As a badge of distinction, they wear a golden earring, which is frequently found in the ears of hyænas that are killed, without its having ever been discovered how they catch these animals, so as to decorate them with this strange ornament, and this removes, in the minds of the people, all doubt as to the supernatural powers of the smiths and potters[120]. To the budas is also ascribed the gift of enchantment, especially that of the influence of the evil eye[121]. They nevertheless live unmolested, and are not condemned to the flames by fanatical priests, as the lycanthropes were in the middle ages.

The Abyssinian Zoomorphism is also an important phenomenon, and it reveals itself in a unique way. Among the Abyssinians, blacksmiths and potters form a society, or caste known as Tebbib in Tigrè and Buda in Amhara. This group is regarded with some contempt and is excluded from the Lord’s Supper because people believe they can transform themselves into hyenas and other predatory animals, which makes them feared and regarded with horror. They cleverly maintain this superstition, as it helps them preserve a monopoly on their profitable trades. Although they generally lead good Christian lives (with few Jews or Muslims among them), they don't seem to care much about their excommunication. As a mark of distinction, they wear a golden earring, often found in the ears of hyenas that have been killed, yet no one knows how they manage to catch these animals to decorate them with this unusual ornament. This reinforces people's belief in the supernatural powers of the blacksmiths and potters[120]. The budas are also believed to have enchanting abilities, especially the power of the evil eye[121]. Despite this, they live peacefully and are not condemned to be burned by fanatical priests, unlike werewolves in the Middle Ages.


139

CHAPTER IV.
CONDOLENCES.

Imitation—compassion—sympathy, these are imperfect designations for a common bond of union among human beings—for an instinct which connects individuals with the general body, which embraces with equal force, reason and folly, good and evil, and diminishes the praise of virtue as well as the criminality of vice. In this impulse there are degrees, but no essential differences, from the first intellectual efforts of the infant mind, which are in a great measure based on imitation, to that morbid condition of the soul in which the sensible impression of a nervous malady fetters the mind, and finds its way, through the eye, directly to the diseased texture, as the electric shock is propagated by contact from body to body. To this instinct of imitation, when it exists in its highest degree, is united a loss of all power over the will, which occurs as soon as the impression on the senses has become firmly established, producing a condition like that of small animals when they are fascinated by the look of a serpent. By this mental bondage, morbid sympathy is clearly and definitely distinguished from all subordinate degrees of this instinct, however closely allied the imitation of a disorder may seem to be to that of a mere folly, of an absurd fashion, of an awkward habit in speech and manner, or even of a confusion of ideas. Even these latter imitations, however, directed as they are to foolish and pernicious objects, place the self-independence of the greater portion of mankind in a very doubtful light, and account for their union into a social whole. Still more nearly allied to morbid sympathy than the imitation of enticing folly, although often with a considerable admixture of the latter, is the diffusion of violent excitements, especially those of a religious or political character, which have so powerfully agitated the nations of ancient and modern times, and which may, after an incipient compliance[122], pass into a total loss of power over the will, and an actual disease of the mind. Far be it from us to attempt to awaken all the various tones of this chord, whose vibrations reveal the profound secrets which lie hid in the inmost recesses of the soul. We might well want 140powers adequate to so vast an undertaking. Our business here is only with that morbid sympathy, by the aid of which the dancing mania of the middle ages grew into a real epidemic. In order to make this apparent by comparison, it may not be out of place, at the close of this inquiry, to introduce a few striking examples:—

Copying—compassion—sympathy; these are imperfect terms for a common connection among people—for an instinct that links individuals to the larger community, affecting both reason and folly, good and evil, and diminishing the praise of virtue as well as the blame of vice. There are different levels of this impulse, but no fundamental differences exist, from the initial intellectual efforts of an infant's mind, largely based on imitation, to that troubling state of the soul where the sensory impact of a nervous disorder confines the mind and connects directly to the damaged area, much like an electric shock spreads from body to body. When this instinct of imitation is at its peak, it results in a complete loss of willpower, which happens once the sensory impression is firmly established, creating a state similar to small animals being entranced by a snake. This mental confinement clearly distinguishes morbid sympathy from all lesser degrees of this instinct, no matter how closely imitating a disorder may resemble mimicking just a folly, an absurd trend, an awkward speech and manner, or even a tangle of ideas. Yet even these later imitations, though directed at foolish and harmful targets, throw the self-sufficiency of most individuals into a questionable light and explain their coming together as a social unit. Even more closely related to morbid sympathy than the imitation of tempting folly, although often mixed with it, is the spread of intense excitements, especially those of a religious or political nature, which have significantly stirred the nations of both ancient and modern times, and which may, after an initial compliance [122], lead to a complete loss of willpower and a true mental illness. It would be folly for us to try to explore all the complex nuances of this chord, whose vibrations reveal the deep secrets hidden within the soul's core. We would need 140 powers capable of such a vast undertaking. Our focus here is solely on that morbid sympathy, which fueled the dancing mania of the Middle Ages into a genuine epidemic. To illustrate this through comparison, it may be fitting at the end of this inquiry to present a few compelling examples:—

1. “At a cotton manufactory at Hodden Bridge, in Lancashire, a girl, on the fifteenth of February 1787, put a mouse into the bosom of another girl, who had a great dread of mice. The girl was immediately thrown into a fit, and continued in it, with the most violent convulsions, for twenty-four hours. On the following day, three more girls were seized in the same manner; and on the 17th, six more. By this time, the alarm was so great, that the whole work, in which 200 or 300 were employed, was totally stopped, and an idea prevailed that a particular disease had been introduced by a bag of cotton opened in the house. On Sunday the 18th, Dr. St. Clare was sent for from Preston; before he arrived three more were seized, and during that night and the morning of the 19th, eleven more, making in all twenty-four. Of these, twenty-one were young women, two were girls of about ten years of age, and one man, who had been much fatigued with holding the girls. Three of the number lived about two miles from the place where the disorder first broke out, and three at another factory at Clitheroe, about five miles distant, which last and two more were infected entirely from report, not having seen the other patients, but, like them and the rest of the country, strongly impressed with the idea of the plague being caught from the cotton. The symptoms were anxiety, strangulation, and very strong convulsions; and these were so violent as to last without any intermission from a quarter of an hour to twenty-four hours, and to require four or five persons to prevent the patients from tearing their hair and dashing their heads against the floor or walls. Dr. St. Clare had taken with him a portable electrical machine, and by electric shocks the patients were universally relieved without exception. As soon as the patients and the country were assured that the complaint was merely nervous, easily cured, and not introduced by the cotton, no fresh person was affected. To dissipate their apprehensions still further, the best effects were obtained by causing them to take a cheerful glass and join in a141 dance. On Tuesday the 20th, they danced, and the next day were all at work, except two or three, who were much weakened by their fits.”[123]

1. “At a cotton factory in Hodden Bridge, Lancashire, on February 15, 1787, a girl put a mouse into the shirt of another girl who was terrified of mice. The girl immediately had a fit and was in violent convulsions for twenty-four hours. The next day, three more girls experienced the same thing, and on the 17th, six more followed. By this point, the panic was so intense that the entire factory, which employed 200 to 300 people, was completely shut down. There was a belief that a certain disease had been brought in by a bag of cotton opened in the building. On Sunday the 18th, Dr. St. Clare was called from Preston; by the time he arrived, three more girls had gone into fits, and during that night and the morning of the 19th, eleven additional girls joined them, totaling twenty-four. Of those, twenty-one were young women, two were about ten years old, and one was a man who had been exhausted from trying to manage the girls. Three of the cases were from about two miles away from where the first incident happened, and three more were from another factory in Clitheroe, about five miles away. The last three and two others were affected solely through word of mouth, having never seen the initial patients, but like them and others in the community, they were convinced that the illness was contracted from the cotton. The symptoms included anxiety, choking, and very severe convulsions; these were so intense that they lasted continuously from a quarter of an hour to twenty-four hours, requiring four or five people to stop the patients from pulling their hair and smashing their heads against the floor or walls. Dr. St. Clare had brought a portable electrical machine with him, and he provided electric shocks that relieved all the patients without exception. Once it was made clear to the patients and the community that the issue was simply nervous, easily treatable, and not caused by the cotton, no new cases appeared. To further ease their fears, it was beneficial to encourage them to have a drink and join in a141 dance. On Tuesday the 20th, they danced, and the next day, all were back to work, except for two or three who were still quite weak from their fits.”[123]

The occurrence here described is remarkable on this account, that there was no important predisposing cause for convulsions in these young women, unless we consider as such their miserable and confined life in the work-rooms of a spinning manufactory. It did not arise from enthusiasm, nor is it stated that the patients had been the subjects of any other nervous disorders. In another perfectly analogous case, those attacked were all suffering from nervous complaints, which roused a morbid sympathy in them at the sight of a person seized with convulsions. This, together with the supervention of hysterical fits, may aptly enough be compared to Tarantism.

The event described here is notable because there was no significant underlying cause for the convulsions in these young women, except perhaps their miserable and restricted lives in the spinning factory. It wasn't due to enthusiasm, nor is there any mention of the patients having any other nervous disorders. In a similar case, all those who were affected had existing nervous issues that triggered a strong emotional response when they saw someone having convulsions. This, along with the onset of hysterical episodes, can be likened to Tarantism.

2. “A young woman of the lowest order, twenty-one years of age, and of a strong frame, came on the 13th of January, 1801, to visit a patient in the Charité hospital at Berlin, where she had herself been previously under treatment for an inflammation of the chest with tetanic spasms, and immediately on entering the ward, fell down in strong convulsions. At the sight of her violent contortions, six other female patients immediately became affected in the same way, and by degrees eight more were in like manner attacked with strong convulsions. All these patients were from sixteen to twenty-five years of age, and suffered without exception, one from spasms in the stomach, another from palsy, a third from lethargy, a fourth from fits with consciousness, a fifth from catalepsy, a sixth from syncope, &c. The convulsions, which alternate in various ways with tonic spasms, were accompanied by loss of sensibility, and were invariably preceded by languor with heavy sleep, which was followed by the fits in the course of a minute or two; and it is remarkable, that in all these patients their former nervous disorders, not excepting paralysis, disappeared, returning, however, after the subsequent removal of their new complaint. The treatment, during the course of which two of the nurses, who were young women, suffered similar attacks, was continued for four months. It was finally successful, and consisted principally 142in the administration of opium, at that time the favourite remedy[124].”

2. “A young woman from the lowest class, twenty-one years old and strong, came on January 13, 1801, to visit a patient at the Charité hospital in Berlin, where she had previously been treated for chest inflammation with tetanic spasms. As soon as she entered the ward, she collapsed into severe convulsions. Seeing her violent movements, six other female patients immediately experienced the same reaction, and gradually eight more began to suffer from intense convulsions. All these patients were between sixteen and twenty-five years old and were all dealing with different issues: one had stomach spasms, another had paralysis, a third was lethargic, a fourth experienced fits while remaining conscious, a fifth suffered from catalepsy, a sixth faced syncope, etc. The convulsions, which alternated in various ways with tonic spasms, came with a loss of sensation and were consistently preceded by a state of heaviness and deep sleep, which turned into fits within a minute or two. It’s notable that all these patients’ previous nervous disorders, including paralysis, vanished, though they returned after their new condition was treated. The treatment, during which two young female nurses also suffered similar attacks, continued for four months. It ultimately succeeded and primarily involved administering opium, which was the preferred remedy at the time[124].”

Now, every species of enthusiasm, every strong affection, every violent passion, may lead to convulsions—to mental disorders—to a concussion of the nerves, from the sensorium to the very finest extremities of the spinal chord. The whole world is full of examples of this afflicting state of turmoil, which, when the mind is carried away by the force of a sensual impression that destroys its freedom, is irresistibly propagated by imitation. Those who are thus infected do not spare even their own lives, but, as a hunted flock of sheep will follow their leader and rush over a precipice, so will whole hosts of enthusiasts, deluded by their infatuation, hurry on to a self-inflicted death. Such has ever been the case, from the days of the Milesian virgins to the modern associations for self-destruction[125]. Of all enthusiastic infatuations, however, that of religion is the most fertile in disorders of the mind as well as of the body, and both spread with the greatest facility by sympathy. The history of the church furnishes innumerable proofs of this, but we need go no further than the most recent times.

Now, every type of enthusiasm, every intense feeling, every extreme passion can lead to convulsions—mental disorders—disruptions of the nerves, from the brain all the way down to the smallest parts of the spinal cord. The world is full of examples of this distressing state of chaos, which, when the mind is overwhelmed by a powerful sensory experience that takes away its freedom, spreads uncontrollably through imitation. Those who become affected don't even hesitate to risk their own lives, and just like a panicked flock of sheep will follow their leader over a cliff, entire groups of enthusiasts, blinded by their obsession, will rush toward a self-destructive end. This has always been true, from the days of the Milesian virgins to today's organizations promoting self-harm[125]. Among all types of fervor, however, the obsession with religion is the most likely to cause disturbances of both the mind and body, and this too spreads easily through shared emotion. The history of the church provides countless examples of this, and we only need to look at the most recent times.

3. In a Methodist chapel at Redruth, a man during divine service, cried out with a loud voice, “What shall I do to be saved?” at the same time manifesting the greatest uneasiness and solicitude respecting the condition of his soul. Some other members of the congregation, following his example, cried out in the same form of words, and seemed shortly after to suffer the most excruciating bodily pain. This strange occurrence was soon publicly known, and hundreds of people, who had come thither, either attracted by curiosity, or a desire, from other motives, to see the sufferers, fell into the same state. The chapel remained open for some days and nights, and from that point the new disorder spread itself, with the rapidity of lightning, over the neighbouring towns of Camborne, Helston, Truro, Penryn, and Falmouth, as well as over the villages in the vicinity. Whilst thus advancing, it decreased in some measure at the place where it had first appeared, and it confined itself throughout 143to the Methodist chapels. It was only by the words which have been mentioned that it was excited, and it seized none but people of the lowest education. Those who were attacked betrayed the greatest anguish, and fell into convulsions; others cried out, like persons possessed, that the Almighty would straightway pour out his wrath upon them, that the wailings of tormented spirits rang in their ears, and that they saw hell open to receive them. The clergy, when in the course of their sermons, they perceived that persons were thus seized, earnestly exhorted them to confess their sins, and zealously endeavoured to convince them that they were by nature enemies to Christ; that the anger of God had therefore fallen upon them; and that if death should surprise them in the midst of their sins, the eternal torments of hell would be their portion. The over-excited congregation upon this repeated their words, which naturally must have increased the fury of their convulsive attacks. When the discourse had produced its full effect, the preacher changed his subject; reminded those who were suffering, of the power of the Saviour, as well as of the grace of God, and represented to them in glowing colours the joys of heaven. Upon this a remarkable reaction sooner or later took place. Those who were in convulsions felt themselves raised from the lowest depths of misery and despair to the most exalted bliss, and triumphantly shouted out that their bonds were loosed, their sins were forgiven, and that they were translated to the wonderful freedom of the children of God. In the mean time, their convulsions continued, and they remained, during this condition, so abstracted from every earthly thought, that they staid two and sometimes three days and nights together in the chapels, agitated all the time by spasmodic movements, and taking neither repose nor nourishment. According to a moderate computation, 4000 people were, within a very short time, affected with this convulsive malady.

3. In a Methodist chapel in Redruth, during a church service, a man shouted, “What should I do to be saved?” showing intense distress and concern for the state of his soul. Other members of the congregation, inspired by him, began to shout the same words and soon appeared to be suffering extreme physical pain. This strange event quickly became public knowledge, and hundreds of people, drawn either by curiosity or other motives to see those in distress, found themselves in the same condition. The chapel stayed open for several days and nights, and from that moment, this new disorder spread rapidly to neighboring towns like Camborne, Helston, Truro, Penryn, and Falmouth, as well as nearby villages. As it spread, it subsided slightly at the location where it first started, remaining confined to the Methodist chapels. The phenomenon was only triggered by the words mentioned, and it primarily affected people with the least education. Those who were affected showed immense anguish and fell into convulsions; some cried out, as if possessed, that God would immediately unleash His wrath upon them, that they heard the cries of tormented souls, and that they could see hell opening up to receive them. The clergy, noticing that people were being seized in the middle of their sermons, urged them to confess their sins and vigorously tried to convince them that they were naturally foes of Christ, that God's anger had therefore come upon them, and that if death caught them in their sins, they would face eternal torment in hell. The overly agitated congregation then echoed their words, which likely intensified the severity of their convulsive episodes. After the sermon reached its full impact, the preacher shifted topics, reminding those suffering of the Savior's power and God's grace, and vividly describing the joys of heaven. This eventually sparked a remarkable turnaround. Those in convulsions felt themselves lifted from the depths of misery and despair to the heights of bliss, joyfully proclaiming that their chains were broken, their sins were forgiven, and that they had been granted the remarkable freedom of God's children. Meanwhile, their convulsions persisted, and during this state, they were so absorbed in spiritual matters that they remained in the chapels for two or even three days and nights, constantly agitated by spasms and taking no rest or nourishment. According to estimates, around 4,000 people were affected by this convulsive condition in a very short period.

The course and symptoms of the attacks were in general as follows:—There came on at first a feeling of faintness, with rigour and a sense of weight at the pit of the stomach, soon after which the patient cried out, as if in the agonies of death or the pains of labour. The convulsions then began, first showing themselves in the muscles of the eyelids, though the eyes themselves were fixed and staring. The most frightful contortions 144of the countenance followed, and the convulsions now took their course downwards, so that the muscles of the neck and trunk were affected, causing a sobbing respiration, which was performed with great effort. Tremors and agitation ensued, and the patients screamed out violently, and tossed their heads about from side to side. As the complaint increased, it seized the arms, and its victims beat their breasts, clasped their hands, and made all sorts of strange gestures. The observer who gives this account remarked that the lower extremities were in no instance affected. In some cases, exhaustion came on in a very few minutes, but the attack usually lasted much longer, and there were even cases in which it was known to continue for sixty or seventy hours. Many of those who happened to be seated when the attack commenced, bent their bodies rapidly backwards and forwards during its continuance, making a corresponding motion with their arms, like persons sawing wood. Others shouted aloud, leaped about, and threw their bodies into every possible posture, until they had exhausted their strength. Yawning took place at the commencement in all cases, but as the violence of the disorder increased, the circulation and respiration became accelerated, so that the countenance assumed a swollen and puffed appearance. When exhaustion came on, patients usually fainted, and remained in a stiff and motionless state until their recovery. The disorder completely resembled the St. Vitus’s dance, but the fits sometimes went on to an extraordinarily violent extent, so that the author of the account once saw a woman, who was seized with these convulsions, resist the endeavours of four or five strong men to restrain her. Those patients who did not lose their consciousness were in general made more furious by every attempt to quiet them by force, on which account they were in general suffered to continue unmolested until nature herself brought on exhaustion. Those affected complained, more or less, of debility after the attacks, and cases sometimes occurred in which they passed into other disorders: thus some fell into a state of melancholy, which, however, in consequence of their religious ecstacy, was distinguished by the absence of fear and despair; and in one patient inflammation of the brain is said to have taken place. No sex or age was exempt from this epidemic malady. Children five years old and octogenarians were alike affected by it, and145 even men of the most powerful frame were subject to its influence. Girls and young women, however, were its most frequent victims[126].

The course and symptoms of the attacks were generally as follows: It started with a feeling of faintness, accompanied by shivering and a sense of heaviness in the stomach. Shortly after, the patient would cry out, as if in extreme pain or labor. Convulsions would then begin, first noticeable in the eyelid muscles, while the eyes themselves remained fixed and wide open. The most horrifying facial contortions followed, and the convulsions spread downward, affecting the neck and trunk, causing labored breathing that required significant effort. Tremors and agitation followed, and patients screamed violently, tossing their heads from side to side. As the condition worsened, it seized the arms, and the victims beat their chests, clasped their hands, and made various strange gestures. The observer who reported this noted that the lower limbs were never affected. In some instances, exhaustion set in within a few minutes, but the attack typically lasted much longer, with some cases continuing for sixty to seventy hours. Many patients who were seated when the attack began bent their bodies rapidly back and forth while moving their arms as if sawing wood. Others yelled loudly, jumped around, and contorted their bodies into every imaginable position until they were exhausted. Yawning occurred at the beginning in all instances, but as the intensity of the episode increased, breathing and circulation sped up, causing the face to look swollen and puffy. When exhaustion hit, patients usually fainted and remained stiff and motionless until they recovered. The disorder closely resembled St. Vitus’s dance, but the episodes sometimes escalated to an extraordinarily violent degree. One observer recounted seeing a woman experiencing these convulsions resist the efforts of four or five strong men trying to hold her down. Those patients who did not lose consciousness generally became even more agitated with every attempt to calm them by force, which is why they were usually left alone until nature took its course and led to exhaustion. Those affected reported varying degrees of weakness after the attacks, and there were instances where they developed other disorders: some fell into a state of melancholy, which, due to their religious fervor, was marked by a lack of fear and despair; in one patient, inflammation of the brain was reported. No sex or age group was exempt from this epidemic illness. Children as young as five and octogenarians were equally affected, and even men with strong builds were not immune. However, girls and young women were its most common victims.

4. For the last hundred years a nervous affection of a perfectly similar kind has existed in the Shetland Islands, which furnishes a striking example, perhaps the only one now existing, of the very lasting propagation by sympathy of this species of disorders. The origin of the malady was very insignificant. An epileptic woman had a fit in church, and whether it was that the minds of the congregation were excited by devotion, or that, being overcome at the sight of the strong convulsions, their sympathy was called forth, certain it is, that many adult women, and even children, some of whom were of the male sex, and not more than six years old, began to complain forthwith of palpitation, followed by faintness, which passed into a motionless and apparently cataleptic condition. These symptoms lasted more than an hour, and probably recurred frequently. In the course of time, however, this malady is said to have undergone a modification, such as it exhibits at the present day. Women whom it has attacked will suddenly fall down, toss their arms about, writhe their bodies into various shapes, move their heads suddenly from side to side, and with eyes fixed and staring, utter the most dismal cries. If the fit happen on any occasion of public diversion, they will, as soon as it has ceased, mix with their companions and continue their amusement as if nothing had happened. Paroxysms of this kind used to prevail most during the warm months of summer, and about fifty years ago there was scarcely a Sabbath in which they did not occur. Strong passions of the mind, induced by religious enthusiasm, are also exciting causes of these fits, but like all such false tokens of divine workings, they are easily encountered by producing in the patient a different frame of mind, and especially by exciting a sense of shame: thus those affected are under the control of any sensible preacher, who knows how to “administer to a mind diseased,” and to expose the folly of voluntarily yielding to a sympathy so easily resisted, or of inviting such attacks by affectation. An intelligent and pious minister of Shetland informed the physician, who gives an account 146of this disorder as an eye-witness, that being considerably annoyed, on his first introduction into the country, by these paroxysms, whereby the devotions of the church were much impeded, he obviated their repetition by assuring his parishioners, that no treatment was more effectual than immersion in cold water; and as his kirk was fortunately contiguous to a freshwater lake, he gave notice that attendants should be at hand, during divine service, to ensure the proper means of cure. The sequel need scarcely be told. The fear of being carried out of the church, and into the water, acted like a charm; not a single Naiad was made, and the worthy minister, for many years, had reason to boast of one of the best regulated congregations in Shetland. As the physician above alluded to was attending divine service in the kirk of Baliasta, on the Isle of Unst, a female shriek, the indication of a convulsion fit, was heard; the minister, Mr. Ingram, of Fetlar, very properly stopped his discourse, until the disturber was removed; and, after advising all those who thought they might be similarly affected, to leave the church, he gave out, in the meantime, a psalm. The congregation was thus preserved from further interruption; yet the effect of sympathy was not prevented, for as the narrator of the account was leaving the church, he saw several females writhing and tossing about their arms on the green grass, who durst not, for fear of a censure from the pulpit, exhibit themselves after this manner within the sacred walls of the kirk[127].

4. For the past hundred years, a similar nervous condition has existed in the Shetland Islands, serving as a striking example, perhaps the only one still around, of how sympathy can lead to the prolonged spread of these types of disorders. The origin of the issue was quite minor. An epileptic woman had a seizure in church, and whether the congregation was stirred by their devotion or overwhelmed by the intense convulsions, many adult women and even some children, including some boys no more than six years old, started to complain of palpitations followed by faintness, which led to a stiff and seemingly cataleptic state. These symptoms lasted for over an hour and likely occurred frequently. However, over time, this illness is said to have changed to what we see today. Women affected by it suddenly collapse, flail their arms, writhe their bodies into different positions, jerk their heads from side to side, and, with wide, staring eyes, cry out in despair. If a seizure happens during a public event, once it ends, they'll mingle back with their friends and continue enjoying themselves as if nothing happened. Such episodes were most common during the warm summer months, and about fifty years ago, there was hardly a Sunday when they didn't occur. Intense emotions spurred on by religious fervor also trigger these fits, but just like all such false signs of divine influence, they can be managed by altering the patient's mindset—especially by instilling a sense of shame. Those affected are thus under the influence of any wise preacher who knows how to “heal a troubled mind” and reveal the ridiculousness of willingly succumbing to such easily resisted sympathy or inviting these episodes through pretentious behavior. An insightful and devout minister from Shetland told the physician, who documented this disorder as an eyewitness, that he was quite bothered by these episodes when he first arrived in the area, which disrupted church services. To prevent them from happening again, he reassured his parishioners that nothing was more effective than immersion in cold water; since his church was conveniently located near a freshwater lake, he announced that there would be attendants ready to provide the necessary treatment during services. The outcome is hardly surprising. The fear of being carried out of church and into the water worked like magic; not a single person had a fit, and the dedicated minister was able to proudly claim for many years that he had one of the best-behaved congregations in Shetland. While the physician mentioned was attending a church service at Baliasta on the Isle of Unst, a female scream—indicating a seizure—was heard; the minister, Mr. Ingram from Fetlar, wisely paused his sermon until the disturbance was addressed, and after advising anyone who thought they might be similarly affected to leave the church, he led the congregation in a psalm. This way, the congregation was spared any further interruptions; however, the effect of sympathy was not deterred. As the narrator of the story left the church, he saw several women writhing and flailing their arms on the green grass, too afraid of being scolded from the pulpit to behave that way inside the church walls.

In the production of this disorder, which no doubt still exists, fanaticism certainly had a smaller share than the irritable state of women out of health, who only needed excitement, no matter of what kind, to throw them into the prevailing nervous paroxysms. When, however, that powerful cause of nervous disorders takes the lead, we find far more remarkable symptoms developed, and it then depends on the mental condition of the people among whom they appear, whether in their spread, they shall take a narrow or an extended range—whether confined to some small knot of zealots they are to vanish without a trace, or whether they are to attain even historical importance.

In creating this disorder, which definitely still exists, fanaticism played a smaller role than the irritated state of unhealthy women, who just needed some kind of excitement to trigger their nervous episodes. However, when that powerful cause of nervous issues is at the forefront, we see much more significant symptoms emerge, and it depends on the mindset of the people among whom they arise whether their spread will be limited or widespread—whether they will disappear without a trace in a small group of zealots or gain some historical significance.

5. The appearance of the Convulsionnaires in France, whose inhabitants, from the greater mobility of their blood, have in 147general been the less liable to fanaticism, is, in this respect, instructive and worthy of attention. In the year 1727 there died, in the capital of that country, the Deacon Pâris, a zealous opposer of the Ultramontanists, division having arisen in the French church on account of the bull “Unigenitus.” People made frequent visits to his tomb, in the cemetery of St. Medard, and four years afterwards, (in September, 1731,) a rumour was spread, that miracles took place there. Patients were seized with convulsions and tetanic spasms, rolled upon the ground like persons possessed, were thrown into violent contortions of their heads and limbs, and suffered the greatest oppression, accompanied by quickness and irregularity of pulse. This novel occurrence excited the greatest sensation all over Paris, and an immense concourse of people resorted daily to the above named cemetery, in order to see so wonderful a spectacle, which the Ultramontanists immediately interpreted as a work of Satan, while their opponents ascribed it to a divine influence. The disorder soon increased, until it produced, in nervous women, clairvoyance, (Schlafwachen,) a phenomenon till then unknown; for one female especially attracted attention, who blindfold, and, as it was believed, by means of the sense of smell, read every writing that was placed before her, and distinguished the characters of unknown persons. The very earth taken from the grave of the Deacon, was soon thought to possess miraculous power. It was sent to numerous sick persons at a distance, whereby they were said to have been cured, and thus this nervous disorder spread far beyond the limits of the capital, so that at one time it was computed that there were more than eight hundred decided Convulsionnaires, who would hardly have increased so much in numbers, had not Louis XV. directed that the cemetery should be closed[128]. The disorder itself assumed various forms, and augmented, by its attacks, the general excitement. Many persons, besides suffering from the convulsions, became the subjects of violent pain, which required the assistance of their brethren of the faith. On this account they, as well as those who afforded them aid, were called by the common title of Secourists. The modes of relief adopted were remarkably in accordance with those which were administered 148to the St. John’s dancers and the Tarantati, and they were in general very rough; for the sufferers were beaten and goaded in various parts of the body with stones, hammers, swords, clubs, &c., of which treatment the defenders of this extraordinary sect relate the most astonishing examples, in proof that severe pain is imperatively demanded by nature in this disorder, as an effectual counter-irritant. The Secourists used wooden clubs, in the same manner as paviors use their mallets, and it is stated that some Convulsionnaires have borne daily from six to eight thousand blows, thus inflicted, without danger[129]. One Secourist administered to a young woman, who was suffering under spasm of the stomach, the most violent blows on that part, not to mention other similar cases, which occurred everywhere in great numbers. Sometimes the patients bounded from the ground, impelled by the convulsions, like fish when out of water; and this was so frequently imitated at a later period, that the women and girls, when they expected such violent contortions, not wishing to appear indecent, put on gowns, made like sacks, closed at the feet. If they received any bruises by falling down, they were healed with earth from the grave of the uncanonized saint. They usually, however, showed great agility in this respect, and it is scarcely necessary to remark that the female sex especially was distinguished by all kinds of leaping, and almost inconceivable contortions of body. Some spun round on their feet with incredible rapidity, as is related of the dervishes; others ran their heads against walls, or curved their bodies like rope-dancers, so that their heels touched their shoulders.

5. The emergence of the Convulsionnaires in France, whose residents, due to the greater mobility of their blood, have generally been less prone to fanaticism, is noteworthy and should be given attention. In 1727, Deacon Pâris, a passionate opponent of the Ultramontanists, died in the capital. A division had occurred in the French church because of the bull “Unigenitus.” People frequently visited his tomb in the cemetery of St. Medard, and four years later, in September 1731, rumors began to circulate that miracles were happening there. Patients experienced convulsions and tetanic spasms, rolling on the ground as if possessed, twisting violently with their heads and limbs, and enduring intense oppression, along with a rapid and irregular pulse. This strange occurrence caused a huge sensation throughout Paris, and a massive crowd gathered daily at the cemetery to witness the spectacle. The Ultramontanists immediately claimed it was a work of Satan, while their opponents attributed it to divine intervention. The disorder quickly escalated, leading some nervous women to experience clairvoyance, or (Schlafwachen), a phenomenon previously unknown; one woman in particular drew attention as she was blindfolded yet, as believed, could read any writing placed before her using only her sense of smell and could recognize the handwriting of unknown individuals. Dirt taken from Deacon Pâris's grave soon gained a reputation for miraculous properties. It was sent to many sick people far away, who were said to have been cured, and thus this nervous disorder spread well beyond the city limits, with estimates suggesting that at one point there were over eight hundred confirmed Convulsionnaires, a number that likely wouldn't have grown so much if Louis XV hadn't ordered the cemetery to be closed[128]. The disorder itself manifested in various forms and intensified the general excitement. Many individuals, in addition to experiencing convulsions, suffered from severe pain that required assistance from their fellow believers. For this reason, both the sufferers and those who helped them were collectively called Secourists. The methods of relief they used were notably similar to those administered to the St. John’s dancers and the Tarantati, generally quite harsh; sufferers were struck and prodded in different parts of their bodies with stones, hammers, swords, clubs, etc. The defenders of this unusual sect shared astonishing examples to argue that severe pain is essential to counteract the disorder effectively. The Secourists used wooden clubs similarly to how paviors use mallets, and it was reported that some Convulsionnaires endured between six to eight thousand strikes daily without injury[129]. One Secourist delivered violent blows to a young woman suffering from stomach spasms, along with other similar occurrences that were widespread. Sometimes, the patients would leap off the ground, propelled by convulsions, resembling fish out of water; this became so frequently mimicked later that women and girls, anticipating such extreme contortions, chose to wear sack-like gowns with closed feet to avoid appearing indecent. If they bruised themselves from falling, they healed the injuries with dirt from the grave of the uncanonized saint. Generally, they displayed remarkable agility, and it’s worth mentioning that women, in particular, were known for their incredible leaps and almost unbelievable body contortions. Some spun around on their feet with extraordinary speed, akin to the dervishes; others crashed their heads against walls or bent their bodies like rope-dancers, bringing their heels to their shoulders.

All this degenerated at length into decided insanity. A certain Convulsionnaire, at Vernon, who had formerly led rather a loose course of life, employed herself in confessing the other sex; in other places women of this sect were seen imposing exercises of penance on priests, during which these were compelled to kneel before them. Others played with children’s rattles, or drew about small carts, and gave to these childish 149acts symbolical significations[130]. One Convulsionnaire even made believe to shave her chin, and gave religious instruction at the same time, in order to imitate Pâris, the worker of miracles, who, during this operation, and whilst at table, was in the habit of preaching. Some had a board placed across their bodies, upon which a whole row of men stood; and as, in this unnatural state of mind, a kind of pleasure is derived from excruciating pain, some too were seen who caused their bosoms to be pinched with tongs, while others, with gowns closed at the feet, stood upon their heads, and remained in that position longer than would have been possible had they been in health. Pinault, the advocate, who belonged to this sect, barked like a dog some hours every day, and even this found imitation among the believers.

All of this eventually descended into outright madness. A certain Convulsionnaire in Vernon, who had previously lived a rather reckless lifestyle, took to confessing men. In other locations, women from this group were seen forcing priests to perform penance, during which the priests had to kneel before them. Others played with children's rattles or pulled small carts around, giving these childish activities symbolic meanings. One Convulsionnaire even pretended to shave her chin while giving religious instruction at the same time, trying to mimic Pâris, the miracle worker, who was known to preach while eating. Some had a board placed across their bodies, on which a whole row of men stood; and as, in this twisted state of mind, a sort of pleasure was found in intense pain, there were also those who had their chests pinched with tongs, while others, dressed in gowns that were closed at the feet, stood on their heads and stayed in that position longer than would have been possible if they were healthy. Pinault, the lawyer who was part of this sect, barked like a dog for several hours each day, and even this behavior was copied by the followers.

The insanity of the Convulsionnaires lasted, without interruption, until the year 1790, and during these fifty-nine years, called forth more lamentable phenomena than the enlightened spirits of the eighteenth century would be willing to allow. The grossest immorality found, in the secret meetings of the believers, a sure sanctuary, and, in their bewildering devotional exercises, a convenient cloak. It was of no avail that, in the year 1762, the Grands Secours was forbidden by act of parliament; for thenceforth this work was carried on in secrecy, and with greater zeal than ever; it was in vain, too, that some physicians, and, among the rest, the austere, pious Hecquet[131], and after him Lorry[132], attributed the conduct of the Convulsionnaires to natural causes. Men of distinction among the upper classes, as, for instance, Montgeron the deputy, and Lambert an ecclesiastic (obt. 1813), stood forth as the defenders of this sect; and the numerous writings[133] which were exchanged on the subject, served, by the importance which they thus attached to it, to give it stability. The revolution, finally, shook the structure of this pernicious mysticism. It was not, however, destroyed; for, even during the period of the greatest excitement, the secret meetings were still kept up; prophetic books, by Convulsionnaires 150of various denominations, have appeared even in the most recent times, and only a few years ago (in 1828) this once celebrated sect still existed, although without the convulsions and the extraordinarily rude aid of the brethren of the faith, which, amidst the boasted pre-eminence of French intellectual advancement, remind us most forcibly of the dark ages of the St. John’s dancers[134].

The madness of the Convulsionnaires continued without interruption until 1790, and during these fifty-nine years, it brought about more tragic events than the enlightened thinkers of the eighteenth century would acknowledge. The most blatant immorality found a safe haven in the secret meetings of the followers and used their confusing devotional practices as a cover. It didn’t help that the Grands Secours was banned by parliament in 1762; this only led to the activities being conducted in secrecy with even more zeal. It was also in vain that some doctors, including the strict and devout Hecquet[131] and later Lorry[132], claimed the behavior of the Convulsionnaires was due to natural causes. Notable figures from the upper classes, such as Montgeron the deputy and Lambert an ecclesiastic (died 1813), emerged as defenders of this sect, and the many writings[133] exchanged on the topic gave it a sense of importance and stability. Ultimately, the revolution shook the foundation of this harmful mysticism. However, it was not entirely destroyed; even during the height of the excitement, secret meetings continued. Prophetic books by Convulsionnaires 150 of various kinds have been published even in recent times, and just a few years ago (in 1828), this once-famous sect still existed, although it lacked the convulsions and the crude support of its followers, which, amidst the claimed superiority of French intellectual progress, starkly reminded us of the dark ages of the St. John’s dancers[134].

6. Similar fanatical sects exhibit among all nations[135] of ancient and modern times the same phenomena. An over-strained bigotry is, in itself, and considered in a medical point of view, a destructive irritation of the senses, which draws men away from the efficiency of mental freedom, and peculiarly favours the most injurious emotions. Sensual ebullitions, with strong convulsions of the nerves, appear sooner or later[136], and insanity, suicidal disgust of life, and incurable nervous disorders[137], are but too frequently the consequences of a perverse, 151and, indeed, hypocritical zeal, which has ever prevailed, as well in the assemblies of the Mænades and Corybantes of antiquity, as under the semblance of religion among the Christians and Mahomedans.

6. Similar fanatical sects among all nations[135] in ancient and modern times show the same behaviors. An extreme form of bigotry is, from a medical perspective, a harmful irritation of the senses that distracts people from achieving mental freedom and particularly encourages destructive emotions. Sensual outbursts, accompanied by severe nerve convulsions, appear sooner or later[136], and insanity, a suicidal aversion to life, and chronic nervous disorders[137] are all too often the result of misguided, 151 and even hypocritical zeal, which has always existed, both in the gatherings of the Mænades and Corybantes of ancient times, and disguised as religion among Christians and Muslims.

There are some denominations of English Methodists which surpass, if possible, the French Convulsionnaires; and we may here mention, in particular, the Jumpers, among whom it is still more difficult, than in the example given above, to draw the line between religious ecstacy and a perfect disorder of the nerves; sympathy, however, operates perhaps more perniciously on them than on other fanatical assemblies. The sect of Jumpers was founded in the year 1760, in the county of Cornwall, by two fanatics[138], who were, even at that time, able to collect together a considerable party. Their general doctrine is that of the Methodists, and claims our consideration here, only in so far as it enjoins them, during their devotional exercises, to fall into convulsions, which they are able to effect in the strangest manner imaginable. By the use of certain unmeaning words, they work themselves up into a state of religious frenzy, in which they seem to have scarcely any control over their senses. They then begin to jump with strange gestures, repeating this exercise with all their might, until they are exhausted, so that it not unfrequently happens that women, who, like the Mænades, practise these religious exercises, are carried away from the midst of them in a state of syncope, whilst the remaining members of the congregations, for miles together, on their way home, terrify those whom they meet by the sight of such demoniacal ravings. There are never more than a few ecstatics, who, by their example, excite the rest to jump, and these are followed by the greatest part of the meeting, so that these assemblages of the Jumpers resemble, for hours together, the wildest orgies, rather than congregations met for Christian edification[139].

There are some groups of English Methodists that may even exceed the French Convulsionnaires in intensity, particularly the Jumpers. With them, it's even harder to distinguish between religious ecstasy and a complete breakdown of the nerves. Sympathy seems to have a more harmful effect on them than on other fanatical groups. The Jumpers sect was established in 1760 in Cornwall by two fanatics[138], who were already able to gather a significant following at that time. Their core beliefs align with those of the Methodists, but they stand out in this context because they encourage their members to enter convulsions during worship, which they can achieve in the most bizarre ways. By repeating nonsensical phrases, they work themselves into a state of religious frenzy where they have little control over their senses. They then start jumping with odd gestures, vigorously repeating this until they are worn out. It's not uncommon for women engaged in these religious practices, much like the Mænades, to collapse mid-exercise, while those who remain in the congregation terrify passersby on their way home with their frenzied behavior. Only a few individuals in ecstasy lead the rest into jumping, and they are typically followed by most of the group, making these gatherings of the Jumpers resemble wild orgies more than meetings intended for Christian worship[139].

In the United States of North America, communities of Methodists have existed for the last sixty years. The reports of credible witnesses of their assemblages for divine service in the open-air (camp meetings)[140], to which many thousands flock from 152great distances[141], surpass, indeed, all belief; for not only do they there repeat all the insane acts of the French Convulsionnaires and of the English Jumpers, but the disorder of their minds and of their nerves attains, at these meetings, a still greater height. Women have been seen to miscarry whilst suffering under the state of ecstacy and violent spasms into which they are thrown, and others have publicly stripped themselves and jumped into the rivers. They have swooned away[142] by hundreds, worn out with ravings and fits; and of the Barkers, who appeared among the Convulsionnaires only here and there, in single cases of complete aberration of intellect, whole bands are seen running on all fours, and growling[143] as if they wished to indicate, even by their outward form, the shocking degradation of their human nature. At these camp-meetings the children are witnesses of this mad infatuation, and as their weak nerves are, with the greatest facility, affected by sympathy, they, together with their parents, fall into violent fits, though they know nothing of their import, and many of them retain for life some severe nervous disorder, which, having arisen from fright and excessive excitement, will not afterwards yield to any medical treatment[144].

In the United States, Methodist communities have been around for the last sixty years. The reports from reliable witnesses about their outdoor gatherings for worship (camp meetings)[140]—which attract thousands from 152great distances[141]—are truly unbelievable. Not only do they reenact the bizarre behaviors of the French Convulsionnaires and the English Jumpers, but the chaos in their minds and nerves reaches new extremes at these meetings. Women have been seen to miscarry while in a state of ecstasy and violent spasms, and others have publicly stripped off their clothes and jumped into rivers. They've fainted[142] by the hundreds, exhausted from outbursts and seizures. Unlike the Barkers, who appeared sporadically among the Convulsionnaires in rare cases of complete mental breakdown, entire groups are seen running on all fours and growling[143], as if to show the shocking decline of their human nature. At these camp meetings, children witness this wild obsession, and since their delicate nerves can be easily affected by sympathy, they, along with their parents, enter into violent fits, despite not understanding what it means. Many of them end up with serious nervous disorders for life, which arise from fear and excessive excitement and do not respond to any medical treatment[144].

But enough of these extravagances, which, even in our own days, embitter the lives of so many thousands, and exhibit to the world, in the nineteenth century, the same terrific form of mental disturbance as the St. Vitus’s dance once did to the benighted nations of the middle ages.

But enough of these extravagances, which, even today, make life miserable for so many people and show the world, in the nineteenth century, the same terrifying kind of mental disorder that St. Vitus's dance once did to the uninformed nations of the Middle Ages.


153

153

APPENDIX.

I.

Petri de Herentals, Prioris Floreffiensis Vita Gregorii XI., in Stephan. Baluzii Vitæ Paparum Avenionensium. T. I. Paris, 1693. 4to. p. 483.

Petri de Herentals, Life of Prior Floreffiensis Gregorii XI., in Stephan. Baluzii Lives of the Avignon Popes. Vol. I. Paris, 1693. 4to. p. 483.

Ejus tempore, videlicet A. D. MCCCLXXV., mira secta tam virorum quam mulierum venit Aquisgrani de partibus Alamanniæ, et ascendit usque Hanoniam seu Franciam, cujus talis fuit conditio. Nam homines utriusque sexus illudebantur a dæmonio, taliter quod tam in domibus quam in plateis et in Ecclesiis se invicem manibus tenentes chorizabant et in altum saltabant, ac quædam nomina dæmoniorum nominabant, videlicet Friskes et similia, nullam cognitionem in hujusmodi chorizatione nec verecundiam sui propter astantes populos habentes. Et in fine hujus chorizationis in tantum circa pectoralia torquebantur, quod nisi mappulis lineis a suis amicis per medium ventris fortiter stringerentur, quasi furiose clamabant se mori. Hi vero in Leodio per conjurationes sumptas de illis quæ in catechismo ante baptismum fiunt, a dæmonio liberabantur, et sanati dicebant, quod videbatur eis quod in hora hujus chorizationis erant in fluvio sanguinis, et propterea sic in altum saltabant. Vulgus autem apud Leodium dicebat quod hujusmodi plaga populo contigisset eo, quod populus male baptizatus erat, maxime a Presbyteribus suas tenentibus concubinas. Et propter hoc proposuerat vulgus insurgere in clerum, eos occidendo et bona eorum diripiendo, nisi Deus de remedio providisset per conjurationes prædictas. Quo viso cessavit tempestas vulgi taliter quod clerus multo plus a populo fuit honoratus. De ista autem chorizatione seu secta talia extant rigmata:

Back then, specifically in 1375, a wonderful movement of both men and women arose in Aachen from the regions of Alamannia, and spread up to Hainaut or France, with the following characteristics. People of both genders were possessed by a demon, so much so that both in their homes and in the streets and churches, they held hands, danced in circles, and jumped up high, calling out certain names of demons, such as Friskes and similar ones, showing no shame in their chaotic dancing even in front of the watching crowd. At the end of this dancing, they were so constricted around their chests that unless they were tightly bound with linen cloths by their friends around their midsections, they would cry out as if they were dying. However, in Liège, they were freed from the demon through incantations taken from those performed in the catechism before baptism, and after being healed, they claimed that it felt to them as if during this dancing they were in a river of blood, and that’s why they jumped up high. The common people in Liège said that this plague had come upon them because they had been poorly baptized, especially by priests who kept concubines. Because of this, the populace had intended to rise up against the clergy, killing them and plundering their goods, unless God had provided a remedy through the aforementioned incantations. Seeing this, the rage of the people subsided, such that the clergy were honored much more by the people. Concerning this dancing or movement, such records exist:

Oritur in seculo nova quædam secta
In gestis aut in speculo visa plus nec lecta.
Populus tripudiat nimium saltando.
Se unus alteri sociat leviter clamando.
Frisch friskes cum gaudio clamat uterque sexus.
Cunctus manutergio et baculo connexus.
Capite fert pelleum desuper sertum.
Cernit Mariæ filium et cœlum apertum.
154Deorsum prosternitur. Dudum fit ululatus.
Calcato ventre cernitur statim liberatus.
Vagatur loca varia pompose vivendo.
Mendicat necessaria propriis parcendo.
Spernit videre rubea et personam flentem.
Ad fidei contraria crigit hic gens mentem.
Noctis sub umbraculo ista perpetravit.
Cum naturali baculo subtus se calcavit.
Clerum habet odio. Non curat sacramenta.
Post sunt Leodio remedia inventa,
Hanc nam fraudem qua suggessit sathan est convictus.
Conjuratus evanescit. Hinc sit Christus benedictus.

II.

Jo. Pistorii Rerum familiarumque Belgicarum Cbronicon magnum. Francof. 1654. fol. p. 319. De chorisantibus.

Item Anno. Dn. MCCCLXXIV. tempore pontificates venerabilis Domini Joannis de Arckel Episcopi Leodiensis, in mense Julio in crastino divisionis Apostolorum visi sunt dansatores scilicet chorisantes, qui postea venerunt Trajectum, Leodium, Tungrim et alia loca istarum partium in mense Septembri. Et cœpit hæc dæmoniaca pestis vexare in dictis locis et circumvicinis masculos et fœminas maxime pauperes et levis opinionis ad magnum omnium terrorem; pauci clericorum vel divitum sunt vexati. Serta in capitibus gestabant, circa ventrem mappa cum baculo se stringebant circa umbilicum, ubi post saltationem cadentes nimium torquebantur, et ne creparentur pedibus conculcabantur, vel contra creporem cum baculo ad mappam duriter se ligabant, vel cum pugno se trudi faciebant, rostra calceorum aliqui clamabant se abhorrere, unde in Leodio fieri tunc vetabantur. Ecclesias chorisando occupabant, et crescebant numerose de mense Septembri et Octobri, processiones fiebant ubique, litaniæ et missæ speciales. Leodii apud Sanctam crucem scholaris servitor in vesperis dedicationis, cœpit ludere cum thuribulo, et post vesperas fortiter saltare. Evocatus a pluribus, ut diceret Pater noster, noluit, et Credo respondit in diabolum. Quod videns capellanus, allata stola conjuravit cum per exorcismum baptizandorum, et statim dixit: Ecce inquit, scholaris recedit cum parva toga et calceis rostratis. Dic, tunc inquit, Pater noster et Credo. At ille utrumque dixit perfecte et curatus est. Apud Harstallium uno mane ante omnium Sanctorum, multi eorum ibi congregati consilium habuerunt, ut pariter venientes omnes canonicos, presbyteres et clericos Leodienses occiderent. Canonicus quidam parvæ mensæ minister Simon in claustro Leodiensi155 apud capellam Beatæ virginis, in Deo confortatus, scalam projecit in collum unius, dicens Evangelium: In principio erat verbum, super caput ejus, et per hoc fuit liberatus, et pro miraculo statim fuit pulsatum. Apud S. Bartolomæum Leodii, præsentibus multis, cuidam alii exorcisanti respondit dæmon: Ego exibo libenter. Expecta, inquit presbyter, volo tibi loqui. Et postquam aliquos alios curasset, dixit illi, loquere tu personaliter et responde mihi. Tum solus respondit dæmon: Nos eramus duo, sed socius meus nequior me, ante me exivit, habui tot pati in hoc corpore, si essem extra, nunquam intrarem in corpus Christianum. Cui presbyter: Quare intrasti corpora talium personarum? Respondit: Clerici et presbyteres dicunt tot pulchra verba et tot orationes, ut non possemus intrare corpora ipsorum. Si adhuc fuisset expectatum per quindenam vel mensem, nos intrassemus corpora divitum, et postea principum, et sic per eos destruxissemus clerum. Et hæc fuerunt ibi a multis audita et postea a multis narrata. Hæc pestis intra annum satis invaluit, sed postea per tres aut quatuor annos omnino cessavit.

Item Anno. Dn. 1474. During the pontificate of the venerable Lord John de Arckel, Bishop of Liège, in the month of July, the day after the Feast of the Apostles, dancers were seen performing, who later came to Trajectum, Liège, Tongeren, and other areas in the region in September. And this demonic plague began to afflict both men and women, particularly the poor and those of low reputation, to the great terror of everyone; very few clergy or wealthy individuals were affected. They wore crowns on their heads and wrapped cloths around their waists with a staff tightened around their bellies, where they would excessively twist after dancing, and to avoid being trampled underfoot, they would be bound harshly with the staff or pushed with a fist; some would shout that they rejected the sound of their shoes, which led to a ban on such activities in Liège at that time. They occupied the churches with their performances, and their numbers grew significantly from September to October, with processions occurring everywhere, special liturgies, and masses. In Liège, at the Church of the Holy Cross, a student server began to play with a thurible during the evening of the dedication and started to dance vigorously after vespers. Called upon by many to say the Our Father, he refused, and when asked the Creed, he responded with a curse. Seeing this, the chaplain, bringing forth a stole, performed an exorcism and immediately said: "Look," he said, "the student is retreating with his little robe and pointed shoes." "Then say the Our Father and the Creed," he said. And he spoke both perfectly and was healed. In Harstallium, one morning before All Saints, many gathered there to plan to kill all the canons, priests, and clerics of Liège together. A certain canon of small stature, Simon, in the cloister of Liège, strengthened by God, threw a ladder around one’s neck while saying the Gospel: "In the beginning was the Word," and through this he was liberated, and as a miracle, he was immediately struck. At St. Bartholomew’s in Liège, with many present, a certain exorcist was answered by the demon: "I will gladly leave." "Wait," said the priest, "I want to speak to you." And after he had healed some others, he said to him, "Speak personally and answer me." Then the demon answered alone: "We were two, but my worse companion left before me; I had to suffer so much in this body, had I been outside, I would never enter a Christian body." To which the priest asked: "Why did you enter the bodies of such people?" He replied: "Clerics and priests say so many beautiful words and so many prayers that we cannot enter their bodies. If we had been waited upon for a fortnight or a month longer, we would have entered the bodies of the wealthy, and then of the princes, and thus through them, we would have destroyed the clergy." And these things were heard by many there and later narrated by many. This plague became quite severe within a year but then completely ceased after three or four years.


III[145].

Die Limburger Chronik, herausgegeben von C. D. Vogel. Marburg, 1828, 8vo. s. 71.

Anno 1374 zu mitten im Sommer, da erhub sich ein wunderlich Ding auff Erdreich, und sonderlich in Teutschen Landen, auff dem Rhein und auff der Mosel, also dass Leute anhuben zu tantzen und zu rasen, und stunden je zwey gegen ein, und tantzeten auff einer Stätte einen halben Tag, und in dem Tantz da fielen sie etwan offt nieder, und liessen sich mit Füssen tretten auff ihren Leib. Davon nahmen sie sich an, dass sie genesen wären. Und lieffen von einer Stadt zu der andern, und von einer Kirchen zu der andern, und huben Geld auff von den Leuten, wo es ihnen mocht gewerden. Und wurd des Dings also viel, dass man zu Cölln in der Stadt mehr dann fünff hundert Täntzer fand. Und fand man, dass es eine Ketzerey war, und geschahe um Golds willen, das ihr ein Theil Frau und Mann in Unkeuschheit mochten kommen, und die vollbringen. Und fand man da zu Cölln mehr dann hundert Frauen und Dienstmägde, die nicht eheliche Männer hatten. Die wurden alle in der Täntzerey Kinder-tragend, und wann dass sie tantzeten, so bunden und knebelten sie sich hart um den Leib, dass sie desto geringer wären. Hierauff sprachen ein Theils Meister, 156sonderlich der guten Artzt, das ein Theil wurden tantzend, die von heisser Natur wären, und von andern gebrechlichen natürlichen Sachen. Dann deren war wenig, denen das geschahe. Die Meister von der heiligen Schrift, die beschwohren der Täntzer ein Theil, die meynten, dass sie besessen wären von dem bösen Geist. Also nahm es ein betrogen End, und währete wohl sechszehn Wochen in diesen Landen oder in der Mass. Auch nahmen die vorgenannten Täntzer Mann und Frauen sich an, dass sie kein roth sehen möchten. Und war ein eitel Teuscherey, und ist verbottschaft gewesen an Christum nach meinem Bedünken.

In the year 1374, in the middle of summer, something strange happened on Earth, particularly in German lands, along the Rhine and Moselle rivers. People began to dance and rave, standing in pairs and dancing at one spot for half a day. In their dancing, they would often fall down and let others step on their bodies. They believed this would heal them. They traveled from one city to another, and from one church to another, collecting money from people wherever they could. It became such a phenomenon that more than five hundred dancers were found in Cologne. It was thought to be heresy, occurring for the sake of money, causing some men and women to engage in immorality, and they acted out on it. In Cologne, more than a hundred women and maidservants were discovered who did not have husbands. All of them became pregnant during the dancing, and when they danced, they tightly bound and gagged themselves around their bodies to make themselves appear smaller. Some masters, especially the good physicians, noted that some dancers had hot tempers and other natural afflictions. However, there were few in that situation. The masters of holy scripture claimed that some of the dancers were possessed by evil spirits. Thus, it came to a deceiving end and lasted more than sixteen weeks in those lands or in the Mass. The aforementioned dancers, both men and women, resolved that they would not see anything red. It was all a pure delusion and, in my opinion, has been forbidden in Christ.


IV.

Die Chronica van der hilliger Stat van Coellen. A. D. MCCCLXXIV. fol. 277. Coellen, 1499. fol.

In dem seluen iair stonde eyn groisse kranckheit vp vnder den mynschen, ind was doch niet vill me gesyen dese selue kranckheit vur off nae ind quam van natuerlichen ursachen as die meyster schrijnen, ind noemen Sij maniam, dat is raserie off unsynnicheit. Ind vill lude beyde man ind frauwen junck ind alt hadden die kranckheit. Ind gyngen vyss huyss ind hoff, dat deden ouch junge meyde, die verliessen yr alderen, vrunde ind maege ind lantschaff. Disse vurss mynschen zo etzlichen tzijden as Sij die kranckheit anstiesse, so hadden Sij eyn wonderlich bewegung yrre lychamen. Sij gauen vyss kryschende vnd grusame stymme, ind mit dem wurpen Sij sich haestlich up die erden, vnd gyngen liggen up yren rugge, ind beyde man ind vrauwen moist men vmb yren buych ind vmp lenden gurdelen vnd kneuelen mit twelen vnd mit starcken breyden benden, asso stijff vnd harte als men mochte.

In the same year, there was a serious illness affecting humans, and not much was seen of this illness before or after, except for natural reasons as the masters describe it, and they call it mania, which means madness or unreasonableness. Many people, both men and women, young and old, were afflicted by this illness. They would go out from their houses and yards, as did young girls who left their elders, friends, peers, and surroundings. For those affected, whenever they caught this illness, they experienced a strange movement in their bodies. They would make loud and terrifying sounds, and throwing themselves down, they would lie on their backs, and both men and women had to bind their arms around their stomachs and around their waists with towels and strong broad bands, as stiff and tight as possible.

Item asso gegurt mit den twelen dantzten Sij in kyrchen ind in clusen ind vp allen gewijeden steden. As Sij dantzten, so sprungen Sij allit vp ind rieffen, Here sent Johan, so so, vrisch ind vro here sent Johan.

Item associated with the twelve dancers, they were in churches and in cloisters and in all consecrated places. As they danced, they always jumped up and shouted, Here comes John, so and so, fresh and lively here comes John.

Item die ghene die die kranckheit hadden wurden gemeynlichen gesunt bynnen. VV. dagen. Zom lesten geschiede vill bouerie vnd droch dae mit. Eyndeyll naemen sich an dat Sij kranck weren. vp dat Sij mochten gelt dae durch bedelen. Die anderen vinsden sich kranck vp dat Sij mochten vnkuyschheit bedrijuen mit den vrauwen. jnd gyngen durch alle lant ind dreuen vill bouerie. Doch zo lesten brach idt vyss ind wurden verdreuen vyss den landen. Die selue dentzer quamen ouch zo Coellen tusschen tzwen vnser lieuen frauwen missen Assumptionis ind Natiuitatis.

Item, those who were sick became commonly healthy within VV. days. Thus, in the end, many were affected and suffered because of it. Eventually, some took to being sick so they could beg for money. The others considered themselves sick so they could engage in misconduct with the women. They wandered through all the land and caused a lot of trouble. However, in the end, it broke out and spread throughout the lands. The same dancers also came to Cologne between two of our beloved ladies, the feasts of the Assumption and Nativity.

157

157


V.

In the third volume of the Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, p. 434, there is an account of “some convulsive diseases in certain parts of Scotland, which is taken from Sir J. Sinclair’s statistical account, and from which I have thought it illustrative of our author’s subject to make some extracts; the first that is noticed is peculiar to a part of Forfarshire, and is called the leaping ague, which bears so close an analogy to the original St. Vitus’s Dance, or to Tarantism, that it seems to want only the “foul fiend,” or the dreaded bite, as a cause, and a Scotch reel or strathspey as a cure, to render the resemblance quite complete. “Those affected with it first complain of a pain in the head, or lower part of the back, to which succeed convulsive fits, or fits of dancing, at certain periods. During the paroxysm they have all the appearance of madness, distorting their bodies in various ways, and leaping and springing in a surprising manner, whence the disease has derived its vulgar name. Sometimes they run with astonishing velocity, and often over dangerous passes, to some place out of doors, which they have fixed on in their own minds, or, perhaps, even mentioned to those in company with them, and then drop down quite exhausted. At other times, especially when confined to the house, they climb in the most singular manner. In cottages, for example, they leap from the floor to what is called the baulks, or those beams by which the rafters are joined together, springing from one to another with the agility of a cat, or whirling round one of them, with a motion resembling the fly of a jack. Cold bathing is found to be the most effectual remedy; but when the fit of dancing, leaping, or running comes on, nothing tends so much to abate the violence of the disease, as allowing them free scope to exercise themselves, till nature be exhausted. No mention is made of its being peculiar to any age, sex, or condition of life, although I am informed by a gentleman from Brechin, that it is most common before puberty. In some families it seems to be hereditary; and I have heard of one, in which a horse was always kept ready saddled, to follow the young ladies belonging to it, when they were seized with a fit of running. It was first observed in the parish of Kenmuir, and has prevailed occasionally in that and the neighbouring parishes, for about seventy years: but it is not now nearly so frequent as it was about thirty years ago. The history of this singular affection is still extremely imperfect: and it is only from some of the medical practitioners in that part of the country where it prevails, that a complete description can be expected.”

In the third volume of the Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, p. 434, there’s a discussion of “some convulsive diseases in certain parts of Scotland,” which is drawn from Sir J. Sinclair’s statistical account. I thought it was relevant to our author’s topic and decided to share some excerpts. The first condition mentioned is specific to a region in Forfarshire and is known as the leaping ague. It closely resembles the original St. Vitus’s Dance or Tarantism, needing only the “foul fiend” or the feared bite as a cause, along with a Scottish reel or strathspey as a cure, to make the similarity complete. “Those affected start by complaining of a headache or pain in the lower back, followed by convulsive fits, or dancing fits, that occur at specific intervals. During these episodes, they appear to be mad, contorting their bodies in various ways and jumping around surprisingly, which is how the disease got its common name. Sometimes, they run with incredible speed, often across dangerous terrain, to a predetermined outdoor location, which they may have mentioned to those around them, and then collapse in exhaustion. At other times, particularly when indoors, they climb in the most unusual ways. For example, in cottages, they leap from the floor to the beams connecting the rafters, springing between them with the agility of a cat, or spinning around one of them like a fly on a jack. Cold baths are found to be the most effective treatment. However, when the dancing, jumping, or running episodes occur, nothing is more effective in reducing the severity of the disease than allowing them to fully engage in physical activity until they tire themselves out. There’s no indication that it affects any specific age, gender, or social status, although a gentleman from Brechin informed me that it’s most common before puberty. In some families, it seems to be hereditary; I've heard of one family that always kept a horse saddled to follow the young ladies when they experienced a running fit. It was first seen in the parish of Kenmuir and has occasionally appeared in that and nearby parishes for about seventy years; however, it’s not nearly as common as it was thirty years ago. The understanding of this unusual condition is still quite incomplete, and only medical practitioners from that area where it occurs can provide a thorough description.”

Our author has already noticed the convulsive disease prevalent in the Shetland Islands, and has quoted Hibbert’s account of it. The following, however, from a very valuable manuscript account of the Orkney158 and Shetland Islands, drawn up about 1774, by George Low, with notes, by Mr. Pennant, is given in the journal already cited, and will be read with interest. The facts were communicated to Mr. Low by the Rev. Wm. Archibald, parochial clergyman of Unst, the most northerly of the Shetlands.

Our author has already noted the convulsive disease common in the Shetland Islands and has referenced Hibbert’s account of it. However, the following excerpt comes from a valuable manuscript detailing the Orkney158 and Shetland Islands, created around 1774 by George Low, with notes by Mr. Pennant. This is included in the previously mentioned journal and will be of interest to readers. The information was shared with Mr. Low by Rev. Wm. Archibald, the local clergyman of Unst, the northernmost of the Shetland Islands.

“There is a most shocking distemper, which has of late years prevailed very much, especially among young women, and was hardly known thirty or forty years ago. About that period only one person was subject to it. The inhabitants give it the name of convulsion fits; and indeed, in appearance it something resembles epilepsy. In its first rise, it began with a palpitation of the heart, of which they complained for a considerable time; it at length produced swooning fits, in which people seized with it would lie motionless upwards of an hour. At length, as the distemper gathered strength, when any violent passion seized, or on a sudden surprise, they would all at once fall down, toss their arms about, with their bodies, into many odd shapes, crying out all the while most dismally, throwing their heads about from side to side, with their eyes fixed and staring. At first this distemper obtained in a private way, with one female, but she being seized in a public way, at church, the disease was communicated to others; but, whether by the influence of fear or sympathy, is not easy to determine. However this was, our public assemblies, especially at church, became greatly disturbed by their outcries. This distemper always prevails most violently during the summer time, in which season, for many years, we are hardly one sabbath free. In these few years past, it has not prevailed so extensively, and upon the whole, seems on the decline. One thing remarkable in this distemper is, that as soon as the fit is over, the persons affected with it are generally as lively and brisk as before; and if it happens at any of their public diversions, as soon as they revive, they mix with their companions, and continue their amusement as vigorously as if nothing had happened. Few men are troubled with this distemper, which seems more confined to women; but there are instances of its seizing men, and girls of six years of age. With respect to the nature of this disease, people who have made enquiry about it differ, but most imagine it hysterical; however, this seems not entirely the case, as men and children are subject to it; however, it is a new disease in Shetland, but whence imported, none can imagine.

“There is a shocking illness that has become quite common in recent years, especially among young women, and it was hardly known thirty or forty years ago. Back then, only one person was affected by it. The locals call it convulsion fits, and it does resemble epilepsy in appearance. It typically starts with a racing heart, which people complain about for some time; eventually, it leads to fainting spells, where those affected lie still for over an hour. As the illness progresses, when someone experiences strong emotions or sudden shocks, they suddenly collapse, flail their arms and bodies into various strange positions, crying out in a distressing manner, tossing their heads from side to side, eyes wide open and staring. Initially, this illness affected one person privately, but when she had an episode in public at church, it spread to others; it’s unclear whether this was due to fear or sympathy. Regardless, our public gatherings, particularly at church, became quite disturbed by their screams. This illness tends to be most severe during the summer, making it rare for us to have a Sunday free from incidents for many years. In recent years, it hasn’t been as widespread and seems to be on the decline overall. One notable aspect of this illness is that once the episode is over, those affected usually feel as lively and energetic as before, and if it occurs during a public event, they quickly rejoin their friends and continue having fun as if nothing happened. Few men suffer from this illness, as it mainly affects women, although there have been cases involving men and girls as young as six. Opinions on the nature of this disease vary among those who have investigated it, but most believe it to be hysterical; however, this doesn’t fully explain it since men and children can also be affected. Nevertheless, it is a new illness in Shetland, and no one can determine where it originated from.”

“When the statistical account of this parish was published, this awful and afflicting disease was becoming daily less common. In the parishes of Aithsting, Sandsting, and Northmaven, in which it was once very frequent, it was now totally extinct. In the last of these the cure is said to have been effected by a very singular remedy, which, if true, and there seems no reason to doubt it, shows the influence of moral causes in removing, as well as in inducing convulsive disorders.”159 The cure is attributed to a rough fellow of a kirk officer, who tossed a woman in that state, with whom he had been frequently troubled, into a ditch of water. She was never known to have the disease afterwards, and others dreaded the same treatment.

“When the statistical report for this parish was published, this terrible and distressing disease was becoming less common every day. In the parishes of Aithsting, Sandsting, and Northmaven, where it used to be very common, it was now completely gone. In the last of these, the cure is said to have been achieved through a very unusual remedy, which, if true—and there seems to be no reason to doubt it—demonstrates the impact of moral factors in both causing and alleviating convulsive disorders.”159 The cure is credited to a rough kirk officer who threw a woman, whom he had often dealt with in that condition, into a water-filled ditch. She was never known to have the disease again, and others feared the same treatment.

“It, however, still prevails in some of the northern parishes, particularly in Delting, although, according to the description given of it, with some alteration in its symptoms.

“It still exists in some of the northern parishes, particularly in Delting, although, based on the description provided, there are some changes in its symptoms."

“Convulsion fits of a very extraordinary kind seem peculiar to this country. The patient is first seized with something like fainting, and immediately after utters wild cries and shrieks, the sound of which, at whatever distance, immediately puts all who are subject to the disorder in the same situation. It most commonly attacks them when the church is crowded, and often interrupts the service in this and many other churches in the country. On a sacramental occasion, fifty or sixty are sometimes carried out of the church, and laid in the churchyard, where they struggle and roar with all their strength, for five or ten minutes, and then rise up without recollecting a single circumstance that happened to them, or being in the least hurt or fatigued with the violent exertions they had made during the fit. One observation occurs on this disorder, that, during the late scarce years it was very uncommon, and, during the two last years of plenty (1791), it has appeared more frequently.

“Convulsion fits of a very unusual kind seem specific to this country. The person first experiences something like fainting, and immediately after lets out wild cries and screams, the sound of which, no matter the distance, instantly affects anyone else who suffers from the same condition. It usually strikes them when the church is crowded and often interrupts the service in this and many other churches across the country. On occasions like communion, fifty or sixty people are sometimes carried out of the church and laid in the churchyard, where they struggle and roar with all their might for five to ten minutes, and then get up without remembering any of the events that occurred or feeling the least bit hurt or tired from their violent efforts during the fit. One notable observation about this disorder is that, during the recent years of scarcity, it was quite rare, but during the last two years of plenty (1791), it has occurred more frequently.”

“Similar instances of epidemical convulsions are already upon record; but the history of that which occurred in Anglesea, North Wales, is the most remarkable, as its progress was, in all probability, checked by the judicious precautions recommended by Dr. Haygarth.

“Similar cases of widespread convulsions are already on record; however, the account of what happened in Anglesea, North Wales, is the most noteworthy, as its spread was likely halted by the wise measures suggested by Dr. Haygarth.”

“In 1796, on the estates of the Earl of Uxbridge and Holland Griffith, Esq., 23 females, from 10 to 25, and one boy, of about 17 years of age, who had all intercourse with each other, were seized with an unusual kind of convulsions, affecting only the upper extremities. It began with pain of the head, and sometimes of the stomach and side, not very violent; after which there came on violent twitchings or convulsions of the upper extremities, continuing with little intermission, and causing the shoulders almost to meet by the exertion. In bed the disorder was not so violent: but, in some cases at least, it continued even during sleep. Their pulse was moderate, the body costive, and the general health not much impaired. In general they had a hiccough; and, when the convulsions were most violent, giddiness came on, with the loss of hearing and recollection. During their convalescence, and they all recovered, the least fright or sudden alarm brought on a slight paroxysm.

“In 1796, at the estates of the Earl of Uxbridge and Holland Griffith, Esq., 23 females aged 10 to 25 and one boy about 17 years old, all of whom interacted with each other, experienced a strange kind of convulsions affecting only their upper limbs. It began with mild headaches and sometimes stomach and side pain, which were not very intense; after this, there were intense twitching or convulsions in the upper limbs, occurring with little break and causing the shoulders to almost touch due to the strain. In bed, the condition was less severe: however, in some cases at least, it persisted even during sleep. Their pulse was normal, they were constipated, and their overall health wasn't significantly affected. Generally, they had hiccups; and when the convulsions were at their worst, they also experienced dizziness, along with loss of hearing and memory. During their recovery, which all successfully achieved, even the slightest fright or sudden shock could trigger a mild episode.”

“Dr. Haygarth, who was consulted on the means of relieving these unfortunate people, successfully recommended the use of antispasmodics; that all girls and young women should be prevented from having any160 communication with persons affected with those convulsions; and that those who were ill should be kept separate as much as possible.”

“Dr. Haygarth, who was consulted on how to help these unfortunate people, successfully suggested using antispasmodics; that all girls and young women should be kept away from anyone experiencing those convulsions; and that those who were sick should be kept separate as much as possible.”

The same paper from which the above extracts have been taken, quotes a remarkable instance in which religious enthusiasm was the exciting cause of a convulsive disease analogous to those already noticed. The account is given by the Rev. Dr. Meik, at great length. It appears, that in January, 1742, about 90 persons in the parish of Cambuslang, in Lanarkshire, were induced to subscribe a petition to the minister, urging him to give them a weekly lecture, to which he readily assented. Nothing particular occurred at the first two lectures, but, at the third, to which the hearers had been very attentive, when the minister in his last prayer expressed himself thus, “Lord, who hath believed our report; and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed?—where are the fruits of my poor labours among this people?” several persons in the congregation cried out publicly, and about fifty men and women came to the minister’s house, expressing strong convictions of sin, and alarming fears of punishment. After this period, so many people from the neighbourhood resorted to Cambuslang, that the minister thought himself obliged to provide them with daily sermons or exhortations, and actually did so for seven or eight months. The way in which the converts were affected, for it seems they were affected much in the same way, though in very different degrees, is thus described. “They were seized, all at once, commonly by something said in the sermons or prayers, with the most dreadful apprehensions concerning the state of their souls, insomuch that many of them could not abstain from crying out, in the most public and frightful manner, ‘bewailing their lost and undone condition by nature; calling themselves enemies to God, and despisers of precious Christ; declaring that they were unworthy to live on the face of the earth; that they saw the mouth of hell open to receive them, and that they heard the shrieks of the damned;’ but the universal cry was, ‘What shall we do to be saved?’ The agony under which they laboured was expressed, not only by words, but also by violent agitations of body; by clapping their hands and beating their breasts; by shaking and trembling; by faintings and convulsions; and sometimes by excessive bleeding at the nose. While they were in this distress, the minister often called out to them, not to stifle or smother their convictions, but to encourage them: and, after sermon was ended, he retired with them to the manse, and frequently spent the best part of the night with them in exhortations and prayers. Next day, before sermon began, they were brought out, and, having napkins tied round their heads, were placed all together on seats before the tents, where they remained sobbing, weeping, and often crying aloud, till the service was over. Some of those who fell under conviction were never converted; but most of those who fell under it were converted in a few days, and161 sometimes in a few hours. In most cases their conversion was as sudden and unexpected as their conviction. They were raised all at once from the lowest depth of sorrow and distress, to the highest pitch of joy and happiness; crying out with triumph and exultation, ‘that they had overcome the wicked one; that they had gotten hold of Christ, and would never let him go; that the black cloud which had hitherto concealed him from their view was now dispelled; and that they saw him, with a pen in his hand, blotting out their sins.’ Under these delightful impressions, some began to pray, and exhort publicly, and others desired the congregation to join with them in singing a particular psalm, which they said God had commanded them to sing. From the time of their conviction to their conversion, many had no appetite for food, or inclination to sleep, and all complained of their sufferings during that interval.”

The same paper that contains the above excerpts highlights a remarkable case where religious fervor led to a convulsive illness similar to those previously mentioned. The account is extensively detailed by Rev. Dr. Meik. In January 1742, around 90 people in the parish of Cambuslang, Lanarkshire, were prompted to petition the minister, asking for a weekly lecture, which he gladly agreed to. Nothing unusual happened during the first two lectures, but during the third, where the audience was particularly engaged, the minister prayed, "Lord, who has believed our report; and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed?—where are the results of my efforts among this people?” At this moment, several people in the congregation shouted out, and about fifty men and women visited the minister's house, sharing intense feelings of guilt and fears of punishment. Afterward, so many people from the surrounding areas flocked to Cambuslang that the minister felt he had to provide daily sermons or exhortations, which he did for seven or eight months. The way in which the converts were affected, it appears they experienced similar feelings to varying degrees, is described as follows: “They were suddenly struck, usually by something said in the sermons or prayers, with terrifying concerns about the state of their souls, to the point that many could not help but cry out in a very public and alarming manner, lamenting their lost and wretched condition by nature; calling themselves enemies of God and rejecters of Christ; declaring that they were unworthy to live; that they could see hell's mouth ready to devour them, and could hear the screams of the damned;” but the common plea was, “What shall we do to be saved?” Their agony was shown not just in words, but through violent physical movements; clapping their hands and beating their chests; shaking and trembling; fainting and experiencing convulsions; and sometimes excessive nosebleeds. While they were in this distress, the minister frequently urged them not to suppress their feelings but to embrace them. After each sermon, he went back with them to the manse, often spending most of the night with them in encouragement and prayer. The next day, before the sermon began, they were brought out, with cloths tied around their heads, and seated together in front of the tents, where they sobbed, wept, and often cried out until the service ended. Some who felt convicted never found conversion, but most who did were converted in just a few days, sometimes within hours. In most cases, their conversion was as sudden and unexpected as their conviction. They were lifted all at once from the deepest sorrow and distress to the highest joy and happiness; shouting triumphantly that they had overcome evil, that they had grasped Christ and would never let go, that the dark cloud obscuring Him from their view had lifted, and that they saw Him, pen in hand, erasing their sins. With these joyous feelings, some began to pray and publicly exhort, while others invited the congregation to join them in singing a particular psalm, claiming it was God’s command. From the moment of their conviction to their conversion, many lost their appetite for food and didn’t feel like sleeping, and all reported suffering during that period.

The following account, which closes the paper whence the above quotations have been extracted, is taken from an Inaugural Essay on Chorea Sancti Viti, by Felix Robertson of Tennessee, 8vo. Philadelph. 1805.

The following account, which concludes the paper from which the above quotes were taken, is from an Inaugural Essay on Chorea Sancti Viti, by Felix Robertson of Tennessee, 8vo. Philadelphia. 1805.

“The Chorea, which is more particularly the subject of this dissertation, made its appearance during the summer of 1803, in the neighbourhood of Maryville, (Tennessee,) in the form of an epidemic. Previously to entering on its history, I think it necessary to premise a few cursory remarks on the mode of life of those amongst whom it originated, for some time before the appearance of the disease.

“The Chorea, which is mainly what this dissertation is about, first showed up in the summer of 1803 around Maryville, Tennessee, as an epidemic. Before diving into its history, I feel it’s important to make a few brief comments on the lifestyle of the people in that area leading up to the outbreak of the disease.”

“I suppose there are but few individuals in the United States, who have not at least heard of the unparalleled blaze of enthusiastic religion which burst forth in the western country, about the year 1800; but it is, perhaps, impossible to have a competent idea of its effects, without personal observation. This religious enthusiasm travelled like electricity, with astonishing velocity, and was felt, almost instantaneously, in every part of the states of Tennessee and Kentucky. It often proved so powerful a stimulus, that every other entirely lost its effect, or was but feebly felt. Hence that general neglect of earthly things, which was observed, and the almost perpetual attendance at places of public worship. Their churches are, in general, small and every way uncomfortable; the concourse of people, on days of worship, particularly of extraordinary meetings, was very numerous, and hundreds who lived at too great a distance to return home every evening, came supplied with provisions, tents, &c., for their sustenance and accommodation, during the continuance of the meeting, which commonly lasted from three to five days. They, as well as many others, remained on the spot day and night, the whole or greater part of this time, worshipping their Maker almost incessantly. The outward expressions of their worship consisted chiefly in alternate crying, laughing, singing, and shouting, and, at the same time, performing that variety of gesticulation, which the muscular162 system is capable of producing. It was under these circumstances that some found themselves unable, by voluntary efforts, to suppress the contraction of their muscles; and, to their own astonishment, and the diversion of many of the spectators, they continued to act from necessity, the curious character which they had commenced from choice.

“I guess there are only a few people in the United States who haven't at least heard of the amazing surge of religious enthusiasm that erupted in the western region around the year 1800. However, it’s probably impossible to fully grasp its impact without witnessing it firsthand. This religious fervor spread like wildfire, with incredible speed, and was felt, almost immediately, in every part of Tennessee and Kentucky. It often proved so overwhelmingly stimulating that everything else lost its effect or was barely noticeable. This led to a general neglect of earthly matters, as well as nearly constant attendance at places of public worship. Their churches are generally small and quite uncomfortable; the crowds on worship days, especially for special gatherings, were huge, and many who lived too far away to go home every night came prepared with food, tents, etc., for their sustenance and accommodations during the meeting, which typically lasted from three to five days. They, along with many others, stayed on site day and night for most of that time, worshipping their Creator almost nonstop. The outward expressions of their worship primarily involved alternating crying, laughing, singing, and shouting, along with a variety of gestures that the muscular162 system is capable of producing. Under these circumstances, some found themselves unable to voluntarily suppress the contraction of their muscles; to their own surprise and the amusement of many viewers, they continued to act out of necessity the unique behavior they had initially chosen.”

“The disease no sooner appeared, than it spread with rapidity through the medium of the principle of imitation; thus it was not uncommon for an affected person to communicate it to the greater part of a crowd, who, from curiosity or other motives, had collected around him. It is at this time, in almost every part of Tennessee and Kentucky, and in various parts of Virginia, but is said not to be contagious (or readily communicated) as at its commencement. It attacks both sexes, and every constitution, but evidently more readily those who are enthusiasts in religion, such as those above described, and females; children of six years of age, and adults of sixty, have been known to have it, but a great majority of those affected are from fifteen to twenty-five. The muscles generally affected are those of the trunk, particularly of the neck, sometimes those of the superior extremities, but very rarely, if ever, those of the inferior. The contractions are sudden and violent, such as are denominated convulsive, being sometimes so powerful, when in the muscles of the back, that the patient is thrown on the ground, where, for some time, his motions more resemble those of a live fish, when thrown on land, than any thing else to which I can compare them.

“The disease appeared and quickly spread through the power of imitation; it wasn’t unusual for an infected person to pass it on to most of a crowd that gathered around them out of curiosity or for other reasons. At this time, it can be found in nearly every part of Tennessee and Kentucky, and in various areas of Virginia, but it’s said to be less contagious than it was at the start. It affects both genders and all body types, but seems to target those who are enthusiastic about religion, like those mentioned earlier, as well as females. Children as young as six and adults as old as sixty have been known to have it, but most of those affected are between fifteen and twenty-five. The muscles that are usually affected are in the torso, especially the neck, and sometimes the upper limbs, but very rarely the lower limbs. The contractions are sudden and intense, described as convulsive, sometimes so strong that when they occur in the back muscles, the patient is thrown to the ground, where their movements resemble those of a live fish out of water more than anything else I can compare them to.”

“This, however, does not often occur, and never, I believe, except at the commencement of the disease. The patients, in general, are capable of standing and walking, and many, after it has continued a short time, can attend to their business, provided it is not of a nature requiring much steadiness of body. They are incapable of conversing with any degree of satisfaction to themselves or company, being continually interrupted by those irregular contractions of their muscles, each causing a grunt, or forcible expiration; but the organs of speech do not appear to be affected, nor has it the least influence on the mind. They have no command over their actions by any effort of volition, nor does their lying in bed prevent them, but they always cease during sleep. This disease has remissions and exacerbations, which, however, observe no regularity in their occurrence or duration. During the intermission a paroxysm is often excited at the sight of a person affected, but more frequently by the common salute of shaking hands. The sensations of the patients in a paroxysm are generally agreeable, which the enthusiastic class often endeavour to express, by laughing, shouting, dancing, &c.

"This, however, doesn’t happen often, and never, I think, except at the beginning of the disease. Generally, patients are able to stand and walk, and many, after it has lasted a short while, can take care of their business, as long as it doesn’t require too much physical steadiness. They struggle to have satisfying conversations with themselves or others because they’re constantly interrupted by those irregular muscle contractions, each one causing a grunt or a forceful exhale; however, their speech organs don’t seem to be affected, nor does it impact their mind at all. They have no control over their actions through any conscious effort, and lying in bed doesn’t change that, but it always stops during sleep. This disease has periods of improvement and flare-ups, which, however, don’t follow any regular pattern in when they occur or how long they last. During the breaks, seeing someone else affected often triggers a fit, but more frequently it happens with the usual greeting of shaking hands. The sensations that patients experience during an episode are generally pleasant, which the enthusiastic group often tries to show by laughing, shouting, dancing, etc."

“Fatigue is almost always complained of after violent paroxysms, and sometimes a general soreness is experienced. The heart and arteries appear to be no further affected by the disease, than what arises from the exercise of the body; nor does any change take place in any163 of the secretions or excretions. It has not proved mortal in a single instance within my knowledge, but becomes lighter by degrees, and finally disappears. In some cases, however, of long continuance, it is attended with some degree of melancholia, which seems to arise entirely from the patient’s reflections, and not directly from the disease.

“Fatigue is almost always reported after intense episodes, and sometimes there's a general feeling of soreness. The heart and arteries seem to be affected by the disease only to the extent that comes from physical activity; there aren't any noticeable changes in any163 of the secretions or excretions. To my knowledge, it has never been fatal, but it tends to lessen over time and eventually goes away. However, in some cases that last a long time, it is accompanied by some degree of melancholy, which appears to stem entirely from the patient’s thoughts, rather than directly from the disease.

“The state of the atmosphere has no influence over it, as it rages with equal violence in summer and in winter; in moist and in dry air.”

“The condition of the atmosphere doesn’t affect it, as it storms with the same intensity in summer and winter, in both humid and dry air.”

In the above examples, nervous disorders bearing a strong resemblance to those of the middle ages, are shown to exist in an epidemic form, both in Europe and America, at the present time; but in these instances some general cause of mental excitement—and none is more powerful than religious enthusiasm—seems to have been requisite for their propagation. Their appearance, however, in single cases, is occasionally independent of any such origin, which leads to a belief, not without support in the experiments of modern physiologists, that they occasionally proceed from physical causes, and that it is therefore not necessary to consider them in all cases as the offspring of a disordered imagination.

In the examples above, nervous disorders that closely resemble those from the Middle Ages are seen to exist in an epidemic form, both in Europe and America, today; however, in these cases, some common cause of mental excitement—and none is more powerful than religious enthusiasm—seems necessary for their spread. Their occurrence, though, in single cases, can sometimes happen without any such origin, which suggests, supported by modern physiologists' experiments, that they can occasionally come from physical causes, and it's not always necessary to view them as products of a disordered mind.

A well marked case of a disease approximating to the original Dancing Mania, is related by Mr. Kinder Wood, in the 7th volume of the Medico-Chirurgical Transactions, p. 237. The patient, a young married woman, is described to have suffered from headache and sickness, together with involuntary motions of the eyelids, and most extraordinary contortions of the trunk and extremities, for several days, when the more remarkable symptoms began to manifest themselves, which are thus recorded:—

A clear example of a disease similar to the original Dancing Mania is described by Mr. Kinder Wood in the 7th volume of the Medico-Chirurgical Transactions, p. 237. The patient, a young married woman, is noted to have experienced headaches and nausea, along with involuntary movements of her eyelids and extremely unusual twisting of her body and limbs for several days, after which the more striking symptoms started to appear, as recorded:—

“February 26. Slight motions of the limbs came on in bed. She arose at nine o’clock, after which they increased, and became unusually severe. She was hurled from side to side of the couch-chair upon which she sat, for a considerable time, without intermission; was sometimes instantaneously and forcibly thrown upon her feet, when she jumped and stamped violently. She had headache; the eyelids were frequently affected, and she had often a sudden propensity to spring or leap upwards. The affection ceased about eleven o’clock in the forenoon, the patient being very much fatigued; but it returned about noon, and a third time in the afternoon, when she was impelled into every corner of the room, and began to strike the furniture and doors violently with the hand, as she passed near them, the sound of which afforded her great satisfaction. The fourth attack was at night; was very violent, and ended with sickness and vomiting. She went to bed at half-past eleven. Her nights were invariably good. The last three attacks were more violent than the former ones, but they continued only half an hour each.

“February 26. She started experiencing slight movements in her limbs while in bed. She got up at nine o’clock, and after that, the movements increased and became unusually severe. She was tossed from side to side of the couch-chair she sat in for quite a while, without a break; at times, she was suddenly and forcefully thrown onto her feet, making her jump and stomp around. She had a headache, her eyelids were often affected, and she frequently had the sudden urge to leap upward. The episode stopped around eleven o’clock in the morning, leaving her very tired; however, it came back around noon and a third time in the afternoon, when she was pushed into every corner of the room and began hitting the furniture and doors violently as she passed by, which made a satisfying sound for her. The fourth attack occurred at night; it was very intense and ended with nausea and vomiting. She went to bed at half-past eleven. Her nights were always good. The last three attacks were more intense than the earlier ones, but they only lasted half an hour each.”

“February 27. The attack commenced in bed, and was violent, but of short duration. When she arose about ten, she had a second attack,164 continuing an hour, except an interval of five minutes. She now struck the furniture more violently and more repeatedly. Kneeling on one knee, with the hands upon the back, she often sprang up suddenly and struck the top of the room with the palm of the hand. To do this, she rose fifteen inches from the floor, so that the family were under the necessity of drawing all the nails and hooks from the ceiling. She frequently danced upon one leg, holding the other with the hand, and occasionally changing the legs. In the evening, the family observed the blows upon the furniture to be more continuous, and to assume the regular time and measure of a musical air. As a strain or series of strokes was concluded, she ended with a more violent stroke or a more violent spring or jump. Several of her friends also at this time noticed the regular measure of the strokes, and the greater regularity the disease was assuming; the motions being evidently affected, or in some measure modified by the strokes upon the surrounding bodies. She chiefly struck a small slender door, the top of a chest of drawers, the clock, a table, or a wooden screen placed near the door. The affection ceased about nine o’clock, when the patient went to bed.

“February 27. The attack started in bed, and it was intense but brief. When she got up around ten, she had a second attack, lasting an hour with a five-minute break. During this time, she hit the furniture more forcefully and frequently. Kneeling on one knee with her hands on her back, she often jumped up suddenly and struck the ceiling with her palm. To do this, she lifted herself fifteen inches off the floor, which forced the family to remove all the nails and hooks from the ceiling. She frequently danced on one leg while holding the other and sometimes switched legs. In the evening, the family noticed that the impacts on the furniture became more rhythmic, resembling a musical beat. As a pattern of strikes finished, she would conclude with a more powerful hit or a bigger jump. Several of her friends also commented on the consistent rhythm of the strikes and how the condition seemed to be becoming more regular; the movements were clearly influenced, or somewhat modified, by the impacts on the surrounding objects. She primarily hit a narrow door, the top of a dresser, the clock, a table, or a wooden screen near the door. The episodes stopped around nine o’clock when the patient went to bed.”

“February 28. She arose very well at eight. At half-past nine the motions recommenced; they were now of a more pleasant nature; the involuntary actions, instead of possessing their former irregularity and violence, being changed into a measured step over the room, connected with an air, or series of strokes, and she beat upon the adjacent bodies as she passed them. In the commencement of the attack, the lips moved as if words were articulated, but no sound could be distinguished at this period. It was curious indeed to observe the patient at this time, moving around the room with all the vivacity of the country dance, or the graver step of the minuet, the arms frequently carried, not merely with ease, but with elegance. Occasionally all the steps were so directed as to place the foot constantly where the stone flags joined to form the floor, particularly when she looked downwards. When she looked upwards, there was an irresistible impulse to spring up to touch little spots or holes in the top of the ceiling; when she looked around, she had a similar propensity to dart the forefinger into little holes in the furniture, &c. One hole in the wooden screen received the point of the forefinger many hundred times, which was suddenly and involuntarily darted into it with an amazing rapidity and precision. There was one particular part of the wall to which she frequently danced, and there placing herself with the back to it, stood two or three minutes. This by the family was called ‘the measuring place.’

“February 28. She got up quite well at eight. At nine-thirty, the movements started again; this time they were more pleasant. The involuntary actions, instead of being irregular and violent like before, had transformed into a measured step around the room, accompanied by an air or series of beats, and she tapped on the nearby surfaces as she passed. At the beginning of the episode, her lips moved as if she was forming words, but no sound was discernible at that moment. It was truly fascinating to watch the patient at this time, moving around the room with all the liveliness of a country dance or the more serious step of a minuet, her arms carried not just with ease, but with grace. Occasionally, all her steps seemed directed to place her foot exactly where the stone flags met to form the floor, especially when she looked down. When she looked up, there was a strong urge to jump up and touch small spots or holes in the ceiling; when she looked around, she had a similar impulse to poke her finger into small holes in the furniture, etc. One hole in the wooden screen received the tip of her forefinger hundreds of times, suddenly and involuntarily driven into it with astonishing speed and accuracy. There was one specific spot on the wall where she often danced, and there, facing away from it, she would stand for two or three minutes. The family referred to this spot as ‘the measuring place.’”

“In the afternoon the motions returned, and proceeded much as in the morning. At this time a person present, surprised at the manner in which she beat upon the doors, &c., and thinking he recognised the air, without further ceremony began to sing the tune; the moment this165 struck her ears, she turned suddenly to the man, and dancing directly up to him, continued doing so till he was out of breath. The man now ceased a short time, when commencing again, he continued till the attack stopped. The night before this, her father had mentioned his wish to procure a drum, associating this dance of his daughter with some ideas of music. The avidity with which she danced to the tune when sung as above stated, confirmed this wish, and accordingly a drum and fife were procured in the evening. After two hours of rest, the motions again reappeared, when the drum and fife began to play the air to which she had danced before, viz. the ‘Protestant Boys,’ a favourite popular air in this neighbourhood. In whatever part of the room she happened to be, she immediately turned and danced up to the drum, and as close as possible to it, and there she danced till she missed the step, when the involuntary motions instantly ceased. The first time she missed the step in five minutes; but again rose, and danced to the drum two minutes and a half by her father’s watch, when, missing the step, the motions instantly ceased. She rose a third time, and missing the step in half a minute, the motions immediately ceased. After this, the drum and fife commenced as the involuntary actions were coming on, and before she rose from her seat; and four times they completely checked the progress of the attack, so that she did not rise upon the floor to dance. At this period the affection ceased for the evening.

“In the afternoon, the motions returned and unfolded much like they did in the morning. At that time, someone present, surprised by the way she pounded on the doors, and thinking he recognized the tune, without any hesitation, began to sing it. The moment she heard this, she suddenly turned to the man and danced right up to him, continuing until he was out of breath. He stopped for a short while, but then started again, continuing until the behavior stopped. The night before, her father had expressed his desire to get a drum, linking this dance of his daughter's with some thoughts of music. The enthusiasm with which she danced to the song when it was sung confirmed this wish, and a drum and fife were obtained that evening. After two hours of rest, the motions reappeared again when the drum and fife played the song to which she had previously danced, namely the ‘Protestant Boys,’ a favorite local tune. No matter where she was in the room, she would immediately turn and dance toward the drum, getting as close as possible, and she danced there until she lost the beat, at which point the involuntary motions stopped instantly. The first time she missed the beat was after five minutes; she got up again and danced to the drum for two and a half minutes, by her father’s watch, before she lost the beat again and the motions stopped. She got up a third time, but missed the beat after half a minute, which caused the motions to stop right away. After this, the drum and fife started playing just as the involuntary actions were beginning, even before she got up from her seat, and four times they completely interrupted the progress of the attack, so she didn't get up to dance. At that point, the episode ended for the evening.”

“March 1. She arose very well at half-past seven. Upon my visit this morning, the circumstances of the preceding afternoon being stated, it appeared clear to me, that the attacks had been shortened. Slow as I had seen the effects of medicine in the comparatively trifling disease of young females, I was very willing that the family should pursue the experiment, whilst the medical means were continued.

“March 1. She got up nicely at seven-thirty. During my visit this morning, after discussing what happened yesterday afternoon, it seemed obvious to me that the episodes had become less frequent. Even though I had observed slow results from medicine in the relatively minor illnesses of young women, I was quite open to the family trying out the experiment while still pursuing medical treatment."

“As I wished to see the effect of the instrument over the disease, I was sent for at noon, when I found her dancing to the drum, which she continued to do for half an hour without missing the step, owing to the slowness of the movement. As I sat counting the pulse, which I found to be 120, in the short intervals of an attack, I noticed motions of the lips, previous to the commencement of the dance, and placing my ear near the mouth I distinguished a tune. After the attack of which this was the beginning, she informed me, in answer to my inquiry, that there always was a tune dwelling upon her mind, which at times becoming more pressing, irresistibly impelled her to commence the involuntary motions. The motions ceased at four o’clock.

“As I wanted to see how the instrument affected the disease, I was called in at noon, where I found her dancing to the drum. She kept up the dance for half an hour without missing a step because of the slow tempo. While I counted her pulse, which was 120 during the brief pauses between the attacks, I noticed her lips moving before the dance started. When I leaned in closer, I could hear a tune. After the attack that this dance marked the start of, she told me, in response to my question, that there was always a tune in her head, which sometimes became so strong that it compelled her to begin the involuntary movements. The movements stopped at four o’clock.”

“At half-past seven the motions commenced again, when I was sent for. There were two drummers present, and an unbraced drum was beaten till the other was braced. She danced regularly to the unbraced drum, but the moment the other commenced she instantly ceased. As missing the time stopped the affections, I wished the measure to be166 changed during the dance, which stopped the attack. It also ceased upon increasing the rapidity of the beat, till she could no longer keep time; and it was truly surprising to see the rapidity and violence of the muscular exertion, in order to keep time with the increasing movement of the instrument. Five times I saw her sit down the same evening, at the instant that she was unable to keep the measure; and in consequence of this I desired the drummers to beat one continued roll, instead of a regular movement. She arose and danced five minutes, when both drums beat a continued roll: the motions instantly stopped, and the patient sat down. In a few minutes the motions commencing again, she was suffered to dance five minutes, when the drums again began to roll, the effect of which was instantaneous; the motions ceased, and the patient sat down. In a few minutes the same was repeated with the same effect. It appeared certain that the attacks could now be stopped in an instant, and I was desirous of arresting them entirely, and breaking the chain of irregular associations which constituted the disease. As the motions at this period always commenced in the fingers, and propagated themselves along the upper extremities to the trunk, I desired the drummers, when the patient arose to dance, to watch the commencement of the attack, and roll the drums before she arose from the chair. Six times successively the patient was hindered from rising, by attending to the commencement of the affection; and before leaving the house, I desired the family to attend to the commencement of the attacks, and use the drum early.

“At half-past seven, the movements started again, and I was called for. There were two drummers present, and one unbraced drum was played until the other was ready. She danced normally to the unbraced drum, but the moment the other one started, she immediately stopped. Since losing the beat halted the movements, I wanted the rhythm to be changed during the dance, which interrupted the episode. It also stopped when the tempo increased, until she couldn't keep up; it was truly surprising to see how rapidly and forcefully she moved in order to stay in sync with the increasingly fast beat of the drum. I saw her sit down five times that evening the moment she could no longer keep time; because of this, I instructed the drummers to play a continuous roll instead of a steady rhythm. She got up and danced for five minutes while both drums rolled: the movements immediately stopped, and the patient sat down. After a few minutes, when the movements started again, she was allowed to dance for five minutes, then the drums rolled again, and the effect was instantaneous; the movements stopped, and the patient sat down. A few minutes later, the same thing happened with the same result. It was clear that the episodes could now be halted instantly, and I wanted to completely stop them and break the chain of irregular associations that caused the condition. Since the movements always began in the fingers and spread through the arms to the torso, I asked the drummers to watch for the beginning of the episode and roll the drums before she stood up. Six times in a row, the patient was prevented from getting up by addressing the onset of the issue; and before leaving, I asked the family to notice the start of the episodes and to use the drums early."

“March 2. She arose at seven o’clock, and the motions commenced at ten; she danced twice before the drummer was prepared, after which she attempted to dance again four several times; but one roll of a well-braced drum hindered the patient from leaving her seat, after which the attacks did not recur. She was left weakly and fatigued by the disease, but with a good appetite. In the evening of this day an eruption appeared, particularly about the elbows, in diffused patches of a bright red colour, which went off on the third day.”

“March 2. She got up at seven o’clock, and the movements started at ten; she danced twice before the drummer was ready. After that, she tried to dance again four times, but one roll of a well-tuned drum prevented her from getting up from her seat, after which the episodes didn’t happen again. She felt weak and tired from the illness but had a good appetite. In the evening of this day, a rash appeared, especially around the elbows, in spread-out patches of bright red, which cleared up on the third day.”

Other cases might be adduced, (see 23d vol. of the Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, p. 261; 31st vol. of ditto, p. 299; 5th vol. of the Medico-Chirurgical Transactions, pp. 1 to 23, &c.,) but as there is none more striking than this, they would unnecessarily swell this number of the Appendix, which has already extended to an undue length.

Other examples could be cited, (see 23rd volume of the Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, page 261; 31st volume of the same, page 299; 5th volume of the Medico-Chirurgical Transactions, pages 1 to 23, etc.), but since there’s none more compelling than this, they would just make this Appendix unnecessarily longer, which has already grown too lengthy.

167

167


VI.

MUSIC FOR THE DANCE OF THE TARANTATI,
FROM
ATHAN. KIRCHER.

Magness. de Arte magnetica. Rom. 1654. fol. p. 591.—Repeated in Sam. Hafenreffer, Nosodochium, in quo cutis affectus traduntur. Ulm. 1660. 8vo. p. 485.

Magness. de Arte magnetica. Rom. 1654. fol. p. 591.—Repeated in Sam. Hafenreffer, Nosodochium, in quo cutis affectus traduntur. Ulm. 1660. 8vo. p. 485.

I. Primus modus Tarantella.

I. Primus modus Tarantella.

168

168

II. Secundus modus.

II. Second method.

III. Tertius modus.

III. Tertius modus.

169

169

IV. Antidotum Tarantulæ.

IV. Antidote for Tarantula.

170

170

V.

V.

Stu pettu è fattu Cimbalu d’Amuri:
Tasti li sensi mobili, e accorti:
Cordi li chianti, sospiri, e duluri:
Rosa è lu Cori miu feritu à morti:
Strali è lu ferru, chiai so li miei arduri:
Marteddu è lu pensieri, e la mia sorti:
Mastra è la Donna mia, ch’à tutti l’huri
Cantando canta leta la mia morti.

Some strophes, which are no longer extant, were usually sung between these and the following lines:—

Some stanzas, which no longer exist, were typically sung between these and the next lines:—

Allu mari mi portati,
Se voleti che mi sanati.
Allu mari, alla via:
Cosi m’ama la Donna mia.
Allu mari, allu mari:
Mentre campo, t’aggio amari.

171

171

VI. Tarantella.

VI. Tarantella.

Ritornello.

Ritornello.

172

172

VII. Tono hypodorio.

VII. Tono hypodorio.

173

173

174

174

VIII. Alia clausula.

VIII. Another clause.


FOOTNOTES:
[1] By this term the reader is now to understand the “Epidemics of the Middle Ages.” This work not having been published, as a whole, in the original, there is no general preface by the Author. His Address to the Physicians of Germany is therefore prefixed as an appropriate substitute.
[2] Odor. Raynald. Annal. Ecclesiastic. A. 1374. Lucæ, 1752. fol. Tom. VII. p. 252.
[3] Joh. Wier’s ample Catalogue of Spirits gives no information on this point. Pseudomonarchia dæmonum. Opera omnia, Amstelod. 1660. 4to. p. 649.—Raynald mentions the word Frisckes as the name of a spirit; but this mistake is easily accounted for by his ignorance of the language; for, according to the Chronicle of Cologne, the St. John’s dancers sang during their paroxysm: “Here Sent Johan. so so, vrisch ind vro, here Sent Johan.” St. John so, so, brisk and cheerful, St. John. Die Cronica van der hilliger Stat van Coellen, fol. 277. Coellen, 1499. fol.
[4] Cyr. Spangenberg, Adels-Spiegel—Mirror of Nobility, a detailed historical account of what nobility is, &c. Schmalkalden, 1591. fol. Fol. 403. b.
[5] Petr. de Herentals, Appendix, No. I.
[6] Jo. Trithem. Chronic. Sponheimense, A. 1374. Opera historic. Francof. 1601. fol. p. 332. Also: Abrah. Bzovii Annal. Ecclesiastic. Tom. XIV. Colon. Agripp. 1625. fol. Ann. 1374. (Maniaca passio. S. Johannis chorea.)
[7] Jo. Pistorii Rerum Familiarumque Belgicarum Chronicon magnum. Francof. 1654. fol. p. 319. Here the persons affected are called dansatores, chorisantes. See the whole passage in the Appendix, No. II. Compare Incerti auctoris vetus chronicon Belgicum, Matthæi veteris ævi Analecta. Hag. com. 1738. 4to. Tom. I. p. 51. “Anno MCCCLXXIV. the dansers appeared. Gens impacata cadit, dudum cruciata salvat.” This should be salivat; a quotation from a Latin poem not now extant.
[8] The Limburg Chronicle, published by C. D. Vogel, Marburg, 1828. 8vo. p. 27. This singular phenomenon cannot but remind us of the “Demon of Fashion,” of the middle ages. Extravagant as the love of dress was after the middle of the fourteenth century, the opposition of the enemies of fashion was equally great, and they let slip no opportunity of crying down every change or innovation as the work of the devil. Hence it is extremely probable that the fanatic penitential sermons of zealous priests excited this singular aversion of the St. Vitus dancers. In later times also, signs and wonders took place, on account of things equally insignificant, and the fury of the possessed was directed against the fashions. Compare Möhsen’s History of the Sciences in the Mark of Brandenburg, p. 498. f.
[9] Petr. de Herentals. Appendix, No. I.
[10] Respecting the exorcisms used, see E. G. Förstemann, the Christian Societies of Flagellants. Halle, 1828. 8vo. p. 232.
[11] Limburg Chronicle, p. 71. Cologne Chronicle, loc. cit. See Appendix, Nos. III. and IV.
[12] Dans la ville y eut des dansans, tant grands que petits, onze cents. Journal de Paris, 1785.
[13] Schenk. v. Grafenberg. loc. cit.
[14] “Chorus Sancti Viti, or St. Vitus’ Dance; the lascivious dance, Paracelsus calls it, because they that are taken with it, can do nothing but dance till they be dead, or cured. It is so called for that the parties so troubled were wont to go to St. Vitus for help; and, after they had danced there awhile, they were certainly freed. ’Tis strange to hear how long they will dance, and in what manner, over stools, forms, tables; even great bellied women sometimes (and yet never hurt their children) will dance so long that they can stir neither hand nor foot, but seem to be quite dead. One in red clothes they cannot abide. Musick above all things they love; and therefore magistrates in Germany will hire musicians to play to them, and some lusty, sturdy companions to dance with them. This disease hath been very common in Germany, as appears by those relations of Schenkius, and Paracelsus in his book of madness, who brags how many several persons he hath cured of it. Felix Platerus (de Mentis Alienat. cap. 3.) reports of a woman in Basle whom he saw, that danced a whole month together. The Arabians call it a kind of palsie. Bodine, in his fifth book, de Repub. cap. 1. speaks of this infirmity; Monavius, in his last epistle to Scoltizius, and in another to Dudithus, where you may read more of it.”—Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy, Vol. I. p. 15.—Transl. note.
[15]

J. of Köningshoven, the oldest German Chronicle in existence. The contents are general, but devoted more exclusively to Alsace and Strasburg, published by Schiltern, Strasburg, 1698. 4to. Observat. 21, of St. Vitus’s Dance, p. 1085. f.

J. of Köningshoven, the oldest German Chronicle still around. The content is broad but focuses primarily on Alsace and Strasbourg, published by Schiltern, Strasbourg, 1698. 4to. Observat. 21, of St. Vitus’s Dance, p. 1085. f.

Viel hundert fingen zu Strassburg an
Zu tanzen und springen Frau und Mann,
Am offnen Markt, Gassen und Strassen
Tag und Nacht ihrer viel nicht assen.
Bis ihn das Wüthen wieder gelag.
St. Vits Tanz ward genannt die Plag.”

“Many hundreds of men and women began to dance and jump in the public market-place, the lanes, and the streets of Strasburg. Many of them ate nothing for days and nights, until their mania again subsided. The plague was called St. Vitus’s Dance.”

“Many hundreds of men and women started to dance and jump in the public market, the alleyways, and the streets of Strasbourg. Many of them went days and nights without eating until their frenzy finally calmed down. The plague was known as St. Vitus’s Dance.”

[16] Cæs. Baron. Annales ecclesiastic. Tom. II. p. 819. Colon. Agripp. 1609. fol. See the more ample Acta Sanctorum Junii (The 15th of June is St. Vitus’s day) Tom. II. p. 1013. Antwerp. 1698. fol. From which we shall merely add that Mazara, in Sicily, is supposed to have been the birth-place of our Saint, and that his father’s name was Hylas; that he went from thence with Crescentia (probably his nurse) and Modestus to Lucania, with both of whom he suffered martyrdom under Diocletian. They are all said to have been buried at Florence, and it was not long before the miraculous powers of St. Vitus, which had already manifested themselves in his life-time, were acknowledged throughout Italy. The most celebrated of his chapels were situated on the Promontory of Sicily (called by his name), in Rome and in Polignano, whither many pilgrimages were made by the sick. Persons who had been bitten by mad dogs believed that they would find an infallible cure at his altars, though the power of the Saint in curing wounds of this kind was afterwards disputed by the followers of St. Hubertus, the Saint of the Chase. In 672, his body was with much pomp moved to Apulia, but soon after the priests of many churches and chapels in Italy, gave out that they were in possession of portions of the saint’s body which worked miracles. In the eighth century the veneration of this youthful martyr extended itself to France, and the honour of possessing his body was conferred on the church of St. Denys. By command of the Pope it was solemnly delivered on the 19th of March, 836, by the Abbot Hilduwinus, of St. Denys, to the Abbot Warinus, of Corvey, (founded in 822). On its way thither, which occupied three months (to the 13th of June), many miracles were performed, and the subsequent Abbots of Corvey were able for centuries to maintain the popular belief in the miraculous healing power of their relics, which had indiscriminate influence on all diseases, more especially on those of a demoniacal kind. See Monachi anonymi Historia translationis S. Viti. In G. H. Pertz, Monumenta Germaniæ Historica. Tom. II. Hannov. 1828. fol. p. 576. As a proof of the great veneration for St. Vitus in the fourteenth century, we may further mention that Charles IV. dedicated to him the Cathedral of Prague, of which he had laid the foundation, and caused him to be proclaimed Patron Saint of Bohemia, and a nominal body of the holy martyr was, for this purpose, brought from Parma. Act. Sanctor. loc. cit.
[17] Probably a corruption of Apotropæi. The expression is constantly met with; for example, in Agricola, Proverbs, No. 497. These are the divine protectors, the dii averrunci of the antients. The fourteen saints, to whose churches (between Bamberg and Coburg) thousands still annually make pilgrimages, are the following: 1. Georgius. 2. Blasius. 3. Erasmus. 4. Vitus. 5. Pantaleon. 6. Christophorus. 7. Dionysius. 8. Cyriacus. 9. Achatius. 10. Eustachius. 11. Ægidius. 12. Margaretha. 13. Catharina. 14. Barbara.
[18] J. Agricola. Sybenhundert und fünffzig Teutscher Sprichwörter. No. 497. Seven hundred and fifty German Proverbs. Hagenau, 1537. 8vo. fol. 248.
[19] St. Augustine had already warned the people against committing excesses and singing profane songs at the festival of St. John: “Nec permittamus solemnitatem sanctam cantica luxuriosa proferendo polluere.”—St. Augusti Denkwürdigkeiten aus der Christlichen Archäologie. Vol. III. p. 166. Leipzig. 1820. 8vo. Memorabilia of Christian Archæology.
[20] Wirthwein. Series chronologic. Epistolarum S. Bonifacii ab ann. 716–755. LVII. Concil. Liptinens. p. 131. XV. De igne fricato de ligno, id est, Nodfyr. See Joh. Reiskii. Untersuchung des bei den Alten Teutschen gebräuchlichen heidnischen Nodfyrs, imgleichen des Oster-und Johannis-Feuers. Enquiry respecting the heathen Nodfyrs customary among the ancient Germans, and also the Easter and St. John’s fires. Frankfort, 1696. 8vo.
[21] The Bishop Theodoret of Cyrus in Syria, states, that at the festival of St. John, large fires were annually kindled in several towns, through which men, women and children jumped; and that young children were carried through by their mothers. He considered this custom as an ancient Asiatic ceremony of purification, similar to that recorded of Ahaz, in 2 Kings, xvi. 3. (Quæstiones in IV. Libr. Regum. Interrogat. 47, p. 352. Beati Theodoreti, Episcop. Cyri Opera omnia, Ed. Jac. Sirmondi, Lùt. Paris. 1642. fol. T. I.) Zonaras, Balsamon and Photius speak of the St. John’s fires in Constantinople, and the first looks upon it as the remains of an old Grecian custom. See Reiske, loc. cit. p. 81. That such different nations should have had the same idea of fixing the purification by fire on St. John’s day, is a remarkable coincidence, which perhaps can be accounted for only by its analogy to baptism.
[22] The Life and Adventures of Nathaniel Pearce, written by himself, during a residence in Abyssinia from the year 1810 to 1819. Edited by J. J. Halls. 2 Vols. 8vo. London, 1831. chap. ix. p. 290.
[23] Joann. Trithem. Annal. Hirsaugiens. Oper. Tom. II. Hirsaug. 1690. fol. p. 263. A. 1374. See the before-mentioned Chronicle of Cologne, fol. 276. b., wherein it is said that the people passed in boats and rafts over the city walls.
[24] What took place at the St. John’s fires in the middle ages (about 1280) we learn by a communication from the Bishop Guil. Durantes of Aquitania (Rationale divinorum officiorum. L. VII. c. 26. In Reiske, loc. cit. p. 77.) Bones, horns, and other rubbish, were heaped together to be consumed in smoke, while persons of all ages danced round the flames as if they had been possessed, in the same way as at the Palilia, an ancient Roman lustration by fire, whereat those who took part in them, sprang through a fire made of straw. (Ovid. Met. XIV. 774. Fast. IV. 721.) Others seized burning flambeaux, and made a circuit of the fields, in the supposition that they thereby screened them from danger, while others, again, turned a cart wheel, to represent the retrograde movement of the sun.
[25] J. Chr. Beckmann, Historia des Fürstenthums Anhalt. Zerbst. History of the Principality of Anhalt. Zerbst. 1710. fol. Part III. book 4. chap. 4. § 3. p. 467.
[26] Martini Minoritæ Flores temporum, in Jo. Georg. Eccard, Corpus historiæ medii ævi. Lips. 1723. fol. Tom. I. p. 1632.
[27] Beckmann, loc. cit. § 1. f. p. 465, where many other observations are made on this well known circumstance. The priest named, is the same who is still known in the nursery tales of children as the Knecht Ruprecht.
[28] “Das dich Sanct Veitstanz ankomme.” May you be seized with St. Vitus’s Dance. Joh. Agricola, Sybenhundert und fünffzig Teutscher Sprichwörter. Hagenau, 1537, 8. No. 497. p. 268.
[29] Spangenberg (Adels-Spiegel. Mirror of Nobility, loc. cit.) in his own forcible manner, thus expresses himself on this subject: “It was afterwards pointed out by some, that these people could not have been properly baptized, or at all events, that their baptism was ineffectual, because they had received it from priests who shamelessly lived in open cohabitation with unchaste harlots. Upon this the lower classes rose in rebellion, and would have killed all the priests.” Compare Appendix, No. I.
[30] Bzovii Annal. ecclesiastic. loc. cit. 1468.
[31] See Appendix, Nos. III. and IV.
[32] Theophrasti Bombast von Hohenheym, 7 Buch in der Artzney. Von den Krankheiten, die der Vernunft berauben. 7th Book on Medicine. Of the diseases which produce insanity. Tract I. chap. 3, p. 491. Tract II. chap. 3, p. 501. Opera. Strassburg, 1616. fol. Tom. I.
[33] Chorea procursiva of the moderns. Bernt, Monographia Choreæ Sti. Viti. Prag. 1810. p. 25.
[34]

This proceeding was, however, no invention of his, but an imitation of a usual mode of enchantment by means of wax figures (peri cunculas). The witches made a wax image of the person who was to be bewitched; and in order to torment him, they stuck it full of pins, or melted it before the fire. The books on magic, of the middle ages, are full of such things; though the reader who may wish to obtain information on this subject, need not go so far back. Only eighty years since, the learned and celebrated Storch, of the school of Stahl, published a treatise on witchcraft, worthy of the fourteenth century. “Abhandlung von Kinderkrankheiten.” Treatise on the Diseases of Children. Vol. IV. p. 228. Eisenach, 1751–8.

This process wasn't his invention; instead, it was a copy of a common way to cast spells using wax figures. The witches would create a wax image of the person they wanted to curse and would torture it by sticking it with pins or melting it over a fire. Medieval magic books are full of such practices, but anyone looking for more information doesn't need to look that far back. Just eighty years ago, the renowned Storch, from the Stahl school, published a notable treatise on witchcraft that was worthy of the fourteenth century. “Abhandlung von Kinderkrankheiten.” Treatise on the Diseases of Children. Vol. IV. p. 228. Eisenach, 1751–8.

The ancients were in the habit of employing wax in incantations.

The ancients used wax in their rituals.

Thus Simoetha in Theocritus:

Thus Simoetha in Theocritus:

Ὡς τοῦτον τὸν καρὸν ἐγὼ σὺν δαίμονι τάκω,
Ὡς τάκοιθ’ ὑπ’ ἔρωτος ὁ Μύνδιος αὐτίκα Δέλφις.
See Potter’s Antiquities, Vol. II. p. 251.

and Horace—

and Horace—

“Lanea et effigies erat, altera cerea.”
Lib. 1. Sat. 8. l. 30.
Transl. note.
[35] See Agricola, loc. cit. p. 269. No. 498.
[36] Johann Schenck von Graffenberg, born 1530, took his degree at Tübingen, in 1554. He passed the greater part of his life as physician to the corporation of Freiburg in the Breisgau, and died in 1598.
[37] J. Schenkii a Graffenberg Observationum medicarum, rariarum, &c. Libri VII. Lugdun. 1643. fol. L. I. Obs. VIII. p. 136.
[38] It is related by Felix Plater (born 1536, died 1614) that he remembered in his youth the authorities of Basle having commissioned several powerful men to dance with a girl who had the dancing mania, till she recovered from her disorder. They successively relieved each other; and this singular mode of cure lasted above four weeks, when the patient fell down exhausted, and being quite unable to stand, was carried to an hospital, where she recovered. She had remained in her clothes all the time, and, entirely regardless of the pain of her lacerated feet, she had merely sat down occasionally to take some nourishment, or to slumber, during which the hopping movement of her body continued. Felic. Plateri Praxeos medicæ opus. L. I. ch. 3. p. 88. Tom. I. Basil. 1656. 4to. Ejusd. Observation. Basil. 1641. 8. p. 92.
[39] The 15th of June. Here therefore they did not wait till the Festival of St. John.
[40] Gregor. Horstii Observationum medicinalium singularium Libri IV. priores. His accessit Epistolarum et Consultationum medicar. Lib. I. Ulm. 1628. 4to. Epistol. p. 374.
[41] Jo. Bodin. Method. historic. Amstelod. 1650. 12mo, Ch. V. p. 99.—Idem, de Republica. Francofurt. 1591. 8vo. Lib. V. Ch. I. p. 789.
[42]

A very remarkable case, illustrative in part of this observation, where, however, not the person who was supposed to be the subject of the demoniacal malady, but its alleged authors, were punished, is thus reported by Dr. Watt of Glasgow:—“It occurred at Bargarran, in Renfrewshire, in 1696. The patient’s name was Christian Shaw, a girl of eleven years of age. She is described as having had violent fits of leaping, dancing, running, crying, fainting, &c., but the whole narrative is mixed up with so much credulity and superstition, that it is impossible to separate truth from fiction. These strange fits continued from August, 1696, till the end of March in the year following, when the patient recovered.” An account of the whole was published at Edinburgh, in 1698, entitled, “A true Narrative of the Sufferings of a Young Girl, who was strangely molested by evil spirits, and their instruments, in the West, collected from authentic testimonies.”

A very remarkable case that partially illustrates this observation, where the individuals believed to be responsible for the supposed demonic affliction were punished instead of the person thought to be affected, is reported by Dr. Watt of Glasgow:—“It occurred at Bargarran, in Renfrewshire, in 1696. The patient's name was Christian Shaw, an eleven-year-old girl. She is described as having experienced violent episodes of jumping, dancing, running, crying, fainting, etc., but the entire account is so infused with credulity and superstition that it's impossible to separate fact from fiction. These strange episodes continued from August 1696 until the end of March the following year when the patient recovered.” A complete account was published in Edinburgh in 1698, titled, “A true Narrative of the Sufferings of a Young Girl, who was strangely molested by evil spirits and their instruments, in the West, collected from authentic testimonies.”

The whole being ascribed to witchcraft, the clergy were most active on the occasion. Besides occasional days of humiliation, two solemn fasts were observed throughout the whole bounds of the Presbytery, and a number of clergymen and elders were appointed in rotation, to be constantly on the spot. So far the matter was well enough. But such was the superstition of the age, that a memorial was presented to his Majesty’s most honourable Privy Council, and on the 19th of January, 1697, a warrant was issued, setting forth “that there were pregnant grounds of suspicion of witchcraft in Renfrewshire, especially from the afflicted and extraordinary condition of Christian Shaw, daughter of John Shaw, of Bargarran.” A commission was therefore granted to Alexander Lord Blantyre, Sir John Maxwell, Sir John Shaw, and five others, together with the sheriff of the county, to inquire into the matter, and report. This commission is signed by eleven privy councillors, consisting of some of the first noblemen and gentlemen in the kingdom.

The entire situation was attributed to witchcraft, and the clergy were very active during this time. In addition to a few days of public humiliation, two formal fasts were observed throughout the Presbytery, and several clergymen and elders were assigned in rotation to be present at all times. So far, everything seemed fine. However, due to the superstitions of the time, a memorial was submitted to His Majesty’s esteemed Privy Council, and on January 19, 1697, a warrant was issued stating "that there were strong grounds for suspicion of witchcraft in Renfrewshire, particularly because of the disturbing and unusual condition of Christian Shaw, daughter of John Shaw of Bargarran." Therefore, a commission was established, consisting of Alexander Lord Blantyre, Sir John Maxwell, Sir John Shaw, and five others, along with the county sheriff, to investigate the issue and report back. This commission is signed by eleven privy councillors, including some of the most prominent nobles and gentlemen in the kingdom.

The report of the commissioners having fully confirmed the suspicions respecting the existence of witchcraft, another warrant was issued on the 5th of April, 1697, to Lord Hallcraig, Sir John Houston, and four others, “to try the persons accused of witchcraft, and to sentence the guilty to be burned, or otherwise executed to death, as the commission should incline.”

The commissioners' report completely verified the suspicions about witchcraft, leading to another warrant being issued on April 5, 1697, to Lord Hallcraig, Sir John Houston, and four others, “to try the people accused of witchcraft and to sentence the guilty to be burned or otherwise executed, as the commission saw fit.”

The commissioners, thus empowered, were not remiss in the discharge of their duty. After twenty hours were spent in the examination of witnesses, and counsel heard on both sides, the counsel for the prosecution “exhorted the jury to beware of condemning the innocent; but at the same time, should they acquit the prisoners in opposition to legal evidence, they would be accessory to all the blasphemies, apostacies, murders, tortures, and seductions, whereof these enemies of heaven and earth should hereafter be guilty.” After the jury had spent six hours in deliberation, seven of the miserable wretches, three men and four women, were condemned to the flames, and the sentence faithfully executed at Paisley, on the 10th of June, 1697.—Medico-Chirurg. Trans. Vol. V. p. 20, et seq.—Transl. note.

The commissioners, having been given authority, were diligent in fulfilling their responsibility. After spending twenty hours examining witnesses and hearing arguments from both sides, the prosecutor urged the jury to be careful not to condemn the innocent; however, he also warned that if they acquitted the defendants against the overwhelming evidence, they would be complicit in all the blasphemy, betrayals, murders, tortures, and seductions that these enemies of heaven and earth might commit in the future. After the jury deliberated for six hours, they condemned seven of the unfortunate individuals—three men and four women—to be burned at the stake, and the sentence was carried out in Paisley on June 10, 1697.—Medico-Chirurg. Trans. Vol. V. p. 20, et seq.—Transl. note.

[43] Compare Olaus Magnus, de gentibus septentrionalibus. Lib. XVIII. Ch. 45–47. p. 642, seq. Rom. 1555. fol.
[44]

Burton, in his Anatomy of Melancholy, has the following observations, which, with the ample references by which they are accompanied, will furnish materials for such a history.

Burton, in his Anatomy of Melancholy, makes some observations that, along with the many references that accompany them, will provide material for such a history.

Lycanthropia, which Avicenna calls cucubuth, others lupinam insaniam, or wolf-madness, when men run howling about graves and fields in the night, and will not be persuaded but that they are wolves, or some such beasts. Aëtius (Lib. 6. cap. 11.) and Paulus (Lib. 3. cap. 16.) call it a kind of melancholy; but I should rather refer it to madness, as most do. Some make a doubt of it, whether there be any such disease. Donat. ab Altomari (Cap. 9. Art. Med.) saith, that he saw two of them in his time: Wierus (De Præstig. Demonum, 1. 3. cap. 21.) tells a story of such a one at Padua, 1541, that would not believe to the contrary, but that he was a wolf. He hath another instance of a Spaniard, who thought himself a bear. Forestus (Observat. lib. 10. de Morbis Cerebri, c. 15.) confirms as much by many examples; one, among the rest, of which he was an eye-witness, at Alcmaer in Holland.—A poor husbandman that still hunted about graves, and kept in churchyards, of a pale, black, ugly, and fearful look. Such, belike, or little better, were king Prœtus’ daughters, (Hippocrates lib. de insaniâ,) that thought themselves kine: and Nebuchadnezzar, in Daniel, as some interpreters hold, was only troubled with this kind of madness. This disease, perhaps, gave occasion to that bold assertion of Pliny, (Lib. 8. cap. 22. homines interdum lupos fieri; et contra,) some men were turned into wolves in his time, and from wolves to men again; and to that fable of Pausanias, of a man that was ten years a wolf, and afterwards turned to his former shape; to Ovid’s (Met. lib. 1.) tale of Lycaon, &c. He that is desirous to hear of this disease, or more examples, let him read Austin in his eighteenth book, de Civitate Dei, cap. 5; Mizaldus, cent. 5. 77; Schenkius, lib. 1. Hildesheim, Spicil. 2. de maniâ; Forestus, lib. 10. de morbis cerebri; Olaus Magnus; Vicentius Bellavicensis, spec. met. lib. 31. c. 122; Pierius, Bodine, Zuinger, Zeilgur, Peucer, Wierus, Spranger, &c. This malady, saith Avicenna, troubleth men most in February, and is now-a-days frequent in Bohemia and Hungary, according to Heurnius. (Cap. de Man.) Schernitzius will have it common in Livonia. They lie hid, most part, all day, and go abroad in the night, barking, howling, at graves and deserts; they have usually hollow eyes, scabbed legs and thighs, very dry and pale, (Ulcerata crura; sitis ipsis adest immodica; pallidi; lingua sicca,) saith Altomarus: he gives a reason there of all the symptoms, and sets down a brief cure of them.”—Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy. Tenth Edit.: 8vo. 1804. Vol. 1. Page 13, et seq.

Lycanthropia, which Avicenna refers to as cucubuth, and others call lupinam insaniam, or wolf-madness, describes a condition where people run around graveyards and fields at night, convinced they are wolves or some other beasts. Aëtius (Lib. 6. cap. 11.) and Paulus (Lib. 3. cap. 16.) categorize it as a type of melancholy; however, I would classify it more as madness, which is the view of most. Some question whether this disease truly exists. Donat. ab Altomari (Cap. 9. Art. Med.) claims he saw two cases in his time: Wierus (De Præstig. Demonum, 1. 3. cap. 21.) recounts an incident in Padua in 1541 involving a man who firmly believed he was a wolf. He also mentions a Spaniard who thought he was a bear. Forestus (Observat. lib. 10. de Morbis Cerebri, c. 15.) supports this with several examples, including one he witnessed himself in Alcmaer, Holland—a poor farmer who wandered around graveyards, looking pale, black, ugly, and frightening. Such individuals might resemble the daughters of King Prœtus, as described by Hippocrates lib. de insaniâ, who believed they were cows; and Nebuchadnezzar, as interpreted by some in the Book of Daniel, suffered from a similar form of madness. This condition may have inspired Pliny’s bold statement (Lib. 8. cap. 22. homines interdum lupos fieri; et contra) that some men were turned into wolves in his time, and then back into men; and Pausanias’s tale of a man who was a wolf for ten years before returning to his original form; as well as Ovid’s (Met. lib. 1.) story of Lycaon, etc. For anyone wanting to learn more about this disorder or see additional examples, they can check Austin in his eighteenth book, de Civitate Dei, cap. 5; Mizaldus, cent. 5. 77; Schenkius, lib. 1. Hildesheim, Spicil. 2. de maniâ; Forestus, lib. 10. de morbis cerebri; Olaus Magnus; Vicentius Bellavicensis, spec. met. lib. 31. c. 122; Pierius, Bodine, Zuinger, Zeilgur, Peucer, Wierus, Spranger, etc. According to Avicenna, this illness tends to affect people the most in February and is currently prevalent in Bohemia and Hungary, according to Heurnius. (Cap. de Man.) Schernitzius states it is common in Livonia. They usually hide during the day and only come out at night, barking and howling at graves and wastelands; they typically have sunken eyes, scabby legs and thighs, and appear very dry and pale (Ulcerata crura; sitis ipsis adest immodica; pallidi; lingua sicca), says Altomarus; he explains all their symptoms and provides a brief treatment method for them.”—Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy. Tenth Edit.: 8vo. 1804. Vol. 1. Page 13, et seq.

It is surprising that so learned a writer as Burton should not have alluded to Oribasius, who flourished 140 years before Aëtius, and of whom Freind says, “In auctore hoc miri cujusdam morbi prima mentio est; is Λυκάνθρωπος sive Λυκανθρωπία dicitur, estque melancholiæ, aut insaniæ, species quænam ita ab illo descripta: ‘Quos hoc malum infestos habet, nocturno tempore domo egressi, Lupos in omnibus rebus imitantur, et ad diem usque circa tumulos vagantur mortuorum. Hos ita cognosce: pallidi sunt, oculos hebetes et siccos, non illachrymantes, eosque concavos habent: lingua siccissima est, nulla penitus in ore saliva conspicitur, siti enecti; crura vero, quia noctu sæpe offendunt, sine remedio exulcerata.’—‘Quod ad morbum ipsum attinet, si peregrinantibus fides adhibenda est, fuit olim in quibusdam regionibus, ut in Livonia, Hibernia, et aliis locis visi non infrequens,’” &c.—J. Freind. Opera omnia Med. fol. London. 1733.

It’s surprising that such a knowledgeable writer as Burton didn’t mention Oribasius, who lived 140 years before Aëtius, and about whom Freind says, “In this author, there is a remarkable first mention of a certain disease; it is called Werewolf or Werewolf and is a form of melancholy or madness that he describes as follows: ‘Those afflicted by this condition, when they leave their homes at night, imitate wolves in everything and wander around the graves of the dead until dawn. Here’s how to recognize them: they are pale, with dull and dry eyes that are not tearing, and they have sunken eyes; their tongues are extremely dry, and there’s no saliva visible in their mouths, as they are overwhelmed by thirst; their legs, often injured at night, are ulcerated without remedy.’—‘As for the disease itself, if we can trust the accounts of travelers, it was once not uncommon in certain regions, such as Livonia, Ireland, and other places,’” &c.—J. Freind. Opera omnia Med. fol. London. 1733.

De hujus morbi antiquitatibus vide elegantem Böttigeri disputationem in Sprengelii Beitr. z. Gesch. d. Med. 11. p. 1–45. Blancard. Lexic. Med. Edit. noviss. 8vo. Lipsiæ, 1822.—Transl. note.

De hujus morbi antiquitatibus, see the elegant Böttiger’s discussion in Sprengel's Contributions to the History of Medicine 11, pages 1–45. Blancard’s Lexicon of Medicine, latest edition, 8vo, Leipzig, 1822.—Transl. note.

[45] Born 1430, died 1480. Cornucopiæ latinæ linguæ. Basil. 1536. fol. Comment. in primum Martialis Epigramma, p. 51, 52. “Est et alius stellio ex araneorum genere, qui, simili modo, ascalabotes a Græcis dicitur, et colotes et galeotes, lentiginosus in cavernulis dehiscentibus, per æstum terræ habitans. Hic majorum nostrorum temporibus in Italia visus non fuit, nunc frequens in Apulia visitur. Aliquando etiam in Tarquinensi et Corniculano agro, et vulgo similiter tarantula vocatur. Morsus ejus perraro interemit hominem, semistupidum tamen facit, et varie afficit, tarantulam vulgo appellant. Quidam cantu audito, aut sono, ita excitantur, ut pleni lætitia et semper ridentes saltent, nec nisi defatigati et semineces desistant. Alii semper flentes, quasi desiderio suorum miserabilem vitam agant. Alii visa muliere, libidinis statim ardore incensi, veluti furentes in eam prosiliant. Quidam ridendo, quidam flendo moriantur.”
[46] Lycosa Tarantula.
[47]

The Aranea Tarantula of Linnæus, who, after the technical description, says, “Habitat in Europa australi, potissimum Apulia, in Barbaria, in Tauria, Russiæque, australis desertis, in Astracania ad montes Sibiriæ Altaicos usque, in Persia et reliquo Oriente, in solo præsertim argillaceo in antris, morsu quamvis interdum dolente, olimque famosum tarantismum musica sanandum excitare credito, vix unquam periculoso, cinerascens, oculis duobus prioribus rubris, thorace in areas nigras diviso in centrum concurrentes, abdomine supra fasciis maxillisque nigris.”—Systema Naturæ. Tom. I. pars v. p. 2956.

The Aranea Tarantula of Linnæus states after the technical description, “It is found in southern Europe, especially in Apulia, in Barbary, in Tauria, and in the southern deserts of Russia, in Astrakhan up to the Altai Mountains of Siberia, in Persia and the rest of the East, particularly in clay soil in caves. Its bite, although sometimes painful, is rarely dangerous, and it was once believed to cause ‘tarantism,’ which was cured through music. It has a grayish appearance, with two prominent red eyes, a black divided thorax with areas converging at the center, and an abdomen above featuring black stripes and jaws.” — Systema Naturæ. Tom. I. pars v. p. 2956.

For particulars regarding the habits of the Lycosæ, see Griffith’s Transl. of Cuvier’s Animal Kingdom. Vol. XIII. p. 427 and p. 480. et seq. The author states that M. Chabrier has published (Soc. Acad. de Lille 4e cahier) some curious observations on the Lycosa tarantula of the south of France.—Transl. note.

For details about the habits of the Lycosæ, see Griffith’s translation of Cuvier’s Animal Kingdom, Vol. XIII, p. 427 and p. 480, and following pages. The author mentions that M. Chabrier has published some interesting observations on the Lycosa tarantula from the south of France (Soc. Acad. de Lille 4e cahier). —Transl. note.

[48] Matthiol. Commentar. in Dioscorid. L. II. ch. 59. p. 363. Ed. Venet. 1565. fol.
[49] Perotti, loc. cit.
[50] Probably Lacerto Gecko, as also the synonymes, κωλώτης and γαλεώτης quoted by him.
[51] Lacerta Stellio. It need scarcely be observed that the venomous nature of this harmless creature was a pure invention of Roman superstition.
[52] See Athan. Kircher. loc. cit.
[53] From 1451–1458. Tiraboschi. VI. 11. p. 356.
[54] See p. 12. et seq.
[55] Aëtius, who wrote at the end of the sixth century, mentions six which occur in the older works. 1. ῥάγιον, 2. wolf, 3. μυρμήκειον 4. κρανοκολάπτης, by others, head crusher, 5. stubborn, and 6. σκωλήκιον. Tetrabl. IV. Serm. I. ch. 18. in Hen. Steph. Compare Dioscorid. Lib. VI. ch. 42. Matthiol. Commentar. in Dioscorid. p. 1447. Nicand. Theriac. V. 8. 715. 755. 654.
[56] Aranearum multæ species sunt. Quæ ubi mordent, faciunt multum dolorem, ruborem, frigidum sudorem, et citrinum colorem. Aliquando quasi stranguriæ in urina duritiem, et virgæ extensionem, intra inguina, et genua, tetinositatem in stomacho. Linguæ extensionem, ut eorum sermo non possit discerni. Vomunt humiditatem quasi araneæ telam, et ventris emollitionem similiter, &c. De communibus medico cognitu necessariis locis. Lib. VIII. cap. 22. p. 235. Basil. 1539. fol.
[57] He lived in the middle of the eleventh century, and was a junior contemporary with Constantine of Africa. J. Chr. Gottl. Ackermann, Regimen sanitatis Salerni sive Scholæ Salernitanæ de conservanda bona valetudine præcepta. Stendal. 1790. 8vo. p. 38.
[58] The passage is as follows: “Anteneasmon est species maniæ periculosa nimium. Irritantur tanquam maniaci, et in se manus injiciunt. Hi subito arripiuntur, cum saltatione manuum et pedum, quia intra aurium cavernas quasi voces diversas sonare falso audiunt, ut sunt diversorum instrumentorum musicæ soni; quibus delectantur, ut statim saltent, aut cursum velocem arripiant; subito arripientes gladium percutiunt se aut alios: morsibus se et alios attrectare non dubitant. Hos Latini percussores, alii dicunt dæmonis legiones esse, ut dum eos arripiunt, vexent et vulnerent. Diligentia eis imponenda est, quando istos sonos audierint, includantur, et post accessionis horas phlebotomentur, et venter eis moveatur. Cibos leves accipiant cum calida aqua, ut omnis ventositas, quæ in cerebro sonum facit, egeratur. In ipsa accessione silentium habeant. Quod si spumam per os ejecerint, vel ex canis rabidi morsu causa fuerit, intra septem dies moriuntur.” Garioponti, medici vetustissimi, de morborum causis, accidentibus et curationibus. Libri VIII. Basil. 1536. 8vo. L. I. ch. 2. p. 27.
[59] J. P. Papon. De la peste, ou les époques mémorables de ce fléau. Paris, an 8. 8vo. Tome II. page 270. (1119. 1126. 1135. 1193. 1225. 1227. 1231. 1234. 1243. 1254. 1288. 1301. 1311. 1316. 1335. 1340.)
[60] 1347 to 1350.
[61] Athanasius Kircher gives a full account of the instruments then in use, which differed very slightly from those of our days. Musurgia universalis, sive Ars magna consoni et dissoni. Romæ, 1650, fol. Tom. I. p. 477.
[62] Genialium dierum Libri VI. Lugdun. Bat. 1673. 8vo. Lib. II. ch. 17. p. 398. Alex. ab Alexandro, a distinguished Neapolitan lawyer, lived from 1461 to 1523. The historian Gaudentius Merula, who became celebrated about 1536, makes only a very slight mention of the Tarantism. Memorabilium Gaud. Merulæ Novariensis opus, &c. Lugdun. 1656. 8vo. L. III. ch. 69. p. 251.
[63] Petr. And. Matthioli Commentarii in Dioscorid. Venet. 1565. fol. Lib. II ch. 57. p. 362.
[64] Athanas. Kircher. Magnes sive de Arte magnetica Opus. Rom. 1654. fol. p. 589.
[65] Joann. Juvenis de antiquitate et varia Tarentinorum fortuna Lib. VIII. Neapol. 1589. fol. Lib. II. ch. 17. p. 107. With the exception of the statement quoted, Juvenis has borrowed almost every thing from Matthioli.
[66] Simon. Alloys. Tudecius, physician to Queen Christine, saw a case of this kind in July, 1656. Bonet. Medicina septentrionalis collatit. Genev. 1684. fol.
[67] Epiphan. Ferdinand. Centum historiæ seu observationes et casus medici. Venet. 1621. fol. Hist. LXXXI. p. 259. Ferdinando, a physician in Messapia at the commencement of the seventeenth century, has collected, with much diligence, the various statements respecting the Tarantism of his time. He “was himself an eye witness of it,” (p. 265.) and is by far the most copious of all the old writers on this subject.
[68] Kircher, loc. cit. pp. 588, 589.
[69] Ferdinand. p. 259.
[70]

For example:—

Understood! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.

“Allu mari mi portati
Se voleti che mi sanati.
Allu mari, alla via:
Cosi m’ama la donna mia.
Allu mari allu mari:
Mentre campo, t’aggio amari.”
Kircher, loc. cit. p. 592.—Appendix, No. V.
[71] Ferdinand. loc. cit. p. 257.
[72] Kircher, p. 589.
[73] Plin. Hist. Nat. Lib. XXVIII. ch. 2. p. 447. Ed. Hard.
[74] Cael. Aurelian. Chron. Lib. I. ch. 5. p. 335. Ed. Amman.
[75] Democritus and Theophrastus made mention of it. See Gell. Noct. Attic. Lib. IV. ch. 13.
[76] Ferdinand. p. 260.
[77] Bagliv. loc. cit. p. 618. From more decided statements, however, we learn, that of those who had been bitten only one or two in a thousand died. Ferdinand. p. 255.
[78] Il carnevaletto delle donne. Bagliv. p. 617.
[79] Ferdinand. pp. 254. 260.
[80] Ferdinand. p. 259. Slow music made the Tarantel dancers feel as if they were crushed: spezzati, minuzzati, p. 260.
[81] A. Kircher, loc. cit.
[82] See Appendix, No. V.
[83] Bagliv. loc. cit. p. 623.
[84] A. Kircher, loc. cit.
[85] Ferdinand. p. 262.
[86] This is said of an old man of Avetrano, who was ninety-four years of age. pp. 254. 257.
[87] Idem, p. 261.
[88] Ferdinando saw a man who was hard of hearing listen with great eagerness during the dance, and endeavour to approach the drums and fifes as nearly as possible. p. 258.
[89] Idem, p. 260.
[90] Idem, p. 256.
[91] Idem, p. 260.
[92] Idem, p. 261.
[93] Ferdinand. p. 256.
[94] Idem, p. 258.
[95] Idem, p. 257.
[96] Idem, p. 256.
[97] De Contag. Lib. III. ch. 2. p. 212. Opera Lugdun. 1591. 8vo.
[98] De Contag. p. 254.
[99] Idem, ibid.
[100] Idem, p. 262.
[101] Idem, p. 261.
[102]

“The imaginations of women are always more excitable than those of men, and they are therefore susceptible of every folly when they lead a life of strict seclusion, and their thoughts are constantly turned inwards upon themselves. Hence in orphan asylums, hospitals, and convents, the nervous disorder of one female so easily and quickly becomes the disorder of all. I have read in a good medical work that a nun, in a very large convent in France, began to mew like a cat; shortly afterwards other nuns also mewed. At last all the nuns mewed together every day at a certain time for several hours together. The whole surrounding Christian neighbourhood heard, with equal chagrin and astonishment, this daily cat-concert, which did not cease until all the nuns were informed that a company of soldiers were placed by the police before the entrance of the convent, and that they were provided with rods, and would continue whipping them until they promised not to mew any more.

“The imaginations of women are always more easily stirred than those of men, making them prone to every kind of foolishness when they live in strict seclusion and constantly focus on themselves. This is why in orphanages, hospitals, and convents, the nervous issues of one woman can easily and quickly spread to all. I once read in a reputable medical book about a nun in a large convent in France who started to meow like a cat; soon after, other nuns began to meow too. Eventually, all the nuns meowed together every day at a specific time for several hours. The entire surrounding Christian community listened in both chagrin and amazement to this daily cat concert, which didn’t stop until the nuns were told that a group of soldiers had been stationed by the police at the convent entrance and that they were armed with rods that they would use to whip them if they didn't promise to stop meowing.”

“But of all the epidemics of females which I myself have seen in Germany, or of which the history is known to me, the most remarkable is the celebrated Convent-epidemic of the fifteenth century, which Cardan describes, and which peculiarly proves what I would here enforce. A nun in a German nunnery fell to biting all her companions. In the course of a short time all the nuns of this convent began biting each other. The news of this infatuation among the nuns soon spread, and it now passed from convent to convent, throughout a great part of Germany, principally Saxony and Brandenburg. It afterwards visited the nunneries of Holland, and at last the nuns had the biting mania even as far as Rome.”—Zimmermann on Solitude, Vol. II. Leipsig. 1784.—Transl. note.

“But of all the outbreaks of behavior I’ve witnessed among women in Germany, or those I know about, the most notable is the famous convent outbreak from the fifteenth century that Cardan talks about, which particularly illustrates what I want to emphasize here. A nun in a German convent started biting all her fellow nuns. Before long, all the nuns in this convent began to bite each other. News of this bizarre behavior among the nuns quickly spread, moving from convent to convent across much of Germany, mainly in Saxony and Brandenburg. It later reached the nunneries in Holland, and eventually, the nuns even developed this biting craze as far away as Rome.”—Zimmermann on Solitude, Vol. II. Leipsig. 1784.—Transl. note.

[103] Georg. Baglivi, Diss. de Anatome, morsu et effectibus Tarantulæ. pp. 616, 617. Opp. Lugdun. 1710. 4to.
[104] Ferdinando, p. 257.
[105] Idem, pp. 256, 257, 258.
[106] Ferdinando, p. 258.
[107] Adam Olearius. Vermehrte Moscowitische und Persianische Reisebeschreibung. Travels in Muscovy and Persia. Schleswig, 1663. fol. Book IV. p. 496.
[108] Geor. Baglivi, Dissertatio VI. de Anatome, morsu et effectibus Tarantulæ. (written in 1595.) Opera omnia, Lugdun. 1710. 4to. p. 599.
[109] This physician once saw three patients, who were evidently suffering from a malignant fever, and whose illness was attributed by the bystanders to the bite of the tarantula, forced to dance by having music played to them. One of them died on the spot, and the two others very shortly after. Ch. 7. p. 616.
[110]

Among the instances in which imposture successfully taxes popular credulity, perhaps there is none more remarkable at the present day than that afforded by the Psylli of Egypt, a country which furnishes another illustration of our author’s remark at the commencement of the next chapter. This sect, according to the testimony of modern writers, continues to exhibit the same strange spectacles as the ancient serpent-eaters of Cyrene, described by Strabo, 17 Dio. 51. c. 14. Lucan, 9. v. 894. 937. Herodot. 4. c. 173. Paus. 9. c. 28. Savary states that he witnessed a procession at Rosetta, where a band of these seeming madmen, with bare arms and wild demeanour, held enormous serpents in their hands which writhed round their bodies and endeavoured to make their escape. These Psylli, grasping them by the neck, tore them with their teeth and ate them up alive, the blood streaming down from their polluted mouths. Others of the Psylli were striving to wrest their prey from them, so that it seemed a struggle among them who should devour a serpent. The populace followed them with amazement, and believed their performance to be miraculous. Accordingly they pass for persons inspired, and possessed by a spirit who destroys the effect of the serpent.

Among the examples where deception successfully tests people's gullibility, there's probably none more striking today than the Psylli of Egypt, a place that provides another example of what our author mentions at the start of the next chapter. This group, according to modern writers, still puts on the same bizarre displays as the ancient serpent-eaters of Cyrene, described by Strabo, 17 Dio. 51. c. 14. Lucan, 9. v. 894. 937. Herodot. 4. c. 173. Paus. 9. c. 28. Savary reports that he saw a parade in Rosetta, where a group of these seemingly crazed individuals, with bare arms and wild behavior, held massive snakes that twisted around their bodies and tried to escape. These Psylli, gripping the snakes by the neck, bit into them and devoured them alive, blood streaming from their tainted mouths. Others among the Psylli were trying to grab the snakes from them, creating a competition to see who could eat a serpent. The crowd watched in awe and believed their act to be miraculous. As a result, they are regarded as people who are inspired and possessed by a spirit that nullifies the effects of the serpent.

Sonnini, though not so fortunate as to witness a public exhibition of such performances, yet gives the following interesting account of what he justly calls a remarkable specimen of the extravagance of man. After adverting to the superstitious origin of the sect, he goes on to say that a Saadi, or serpent-eater, came to his apartment accompanied by a priest of his sect. The priest carried in his bosom a large serpent of a dusky green and copper colour, which he was continually handling; and after having recited a prayer, he delivered it to the Saadi. The narrative proceeds:—“With a vigorous hand the Saadi seized the serpent, which twisted itself round his naked arm. He began to appear agitated; his countenance was discomposed; his eyes rolled; he uttered terrible cries, bit the animal in the head, and tore off a morsel, which we saw him chew and swallow. On this his agitation became convulsive; his howlings were redoubled, his limbs writhed, his countenance assumed the features of madness, and his mouth, extended by terrible grimaces, was all in a foam. Every now and then he devoured a fresh morsel of the reptile. Three men endeavoured to hold him, but he dragged them all three round the chamber. His arms were thrown about with violence on all sides, and struck every thing within their reach. Eager to avoid him, M. Forneti and I were obliged sometimes to cling to the wall, to let him pass and escape his blows. We could have wished the madman far away. At length the priest took the serpent from him, but his madness and convulsions did not cease immediately; he bit his hands, and his fury continued. The priest then grasped him in his arms, passed his hand gently down his back, lifted him from the ground, and recited some prayers. By degrees his agitation diminished, and subsided into a state of complete lassitude, in which he remained a few moments.

Sonnini, although he wasn’t lucky enough to see a public display of such performances, provides this fascinating account of what he rightly describes as a remarkable example of human extravagance. After mentioning the superstitious roots of the sect, he continues by saying that a Saadi, or serpent-eater, visited him, accompanied by a priest of his sect. The priest had a large serpent, with a dark green and copper color, tucked away in his bosom, which he was constantly handling. After reciting a prayer, he handed it over to the Saadi. The narrative goes on: “With a strong grip, the Saadi grabbed the serpent, which wrapped itself around his bare arm. He began to show signs of agitation; his face twisted in discomfort, his eyes rolled back; he let out terrifying screams, bit the creature on the head, and tore off a piece, which we saw him chew and swallow. Upon this, his agitation turned convulsive; his howling intensified, his limbs writhed, his face took on a mad expression, and his mouth, twisted by awful grimaces, was covered in foam. Every so often, he devoured another piece of the reptile. Three men tried to restrain him, but he managed to drag all three around the room. His arms flailed violently in all directions, striking everything within reach. Trying to stay out of his way, M. Forneti and I sometimes had to press against the wall to let him pass and dodge his blows. We wished for the madman to be far away. Finally, the priest took the serpent from him, but his madness and convulsions didn’t stop right away; he bit his hands, and his rage went on. The priest then embraced him, gently ran his hand down his back, lifted him off the ground, and recited some prayers. Gradually, his agitation lessened and faded into a state of complete exhaustion, where he remained for a few moments.

“The Turks who were present at this ridiculous and disgusting ceremony were firmly persuaded of the reality of this religious fury; and it is very certain that, whether it were reality or imposture, it is impossible to see the transports of rage and madness exhibited in a more striking manner, or have before your eyes a man more calculated to inspire terror.”—Hunter’s Translation of Sonnini’s Travels, 8vo. 1799.—Transl. note.

“The Turks who were there at this ridiculous and disgusting ceremony were completely convinced of the authenticity of this religious frenzy; and it’s clear that, whether it was real or fake, it’s hard to find a more vivid display of rage and madness, or to encounter a man more capable of instilling fear.”—Hunter’s Translation of Sonnini’s Travels, 8vo. 1799.—Transl. note.

[111] Franc. Serao, della Tarantola o vero Falangio di Puglia. Napol. 1742.—See Thom. Fasani, De vita, muniis et scriptis Franc. Serai, &c. Commentarius. Neapol. 1784. 8vo. p. 76. et seq.
[112] Thom. Fasani, De vita, muniis et scriptis Franc. Serai, &c. Commentarius, p. 88.
[113] Idem, p. 89.
[114] H. Mercurialis, de Venenis et Morbis Venenosis, (Venet. 1601. 4to. Lib. II. ch. 6. p. 39.) repeats the silly tale, that those who were bitten continued, during their paroxysm, to be occupied with whatever they had been engaged in at the time they received the bite, and proves, by a fact which had been communicated to him, that already, in the sixteenth century, they were able to distinguish impostors from those who had been really bitten. H. Cardani, de Subtilitate Libri XXI. Basil. 1560. 8vo. Lib. IX. p. 635. The baneful effect of the venom of the tarantula was obviated, not so much by music as by the great exertion used in dancing. Compare J. Cæs. Scaliger. Exoteric. Exercitt. Libri XV. de Subtilitate, Francof. 1612. 8vo. Ex. 185. p. 610.—J. M. Fehr, Anchora sacra vel Scorzonera. Jen. 1666. 8vo. p. 127. From Alexander ab Alexandro, and several later writers.—Stalpart van der Wiel, Observatt. rarior. Lugdun. Bat. 1687. 8vo. Cent. 1. Obs. C. p. 424. According to Kircher.—Rod. a Castro, Medicus politicus. Hamburg, 1614. 4to. Lib. IV. ch. 16. p. 275. According to Matthioli.—D. Cirillo, Some account of the Tarantula, Philosoph. Trans. Vol. LX. 1770, describes Tarantism as a common imposture. So also does J. A. Unzer, The Physician, Vol. II. pp. 473. 640, Vol. III. pp. 466, 526, 528, 529, 530, 533, 553; likewise A. F. Büsching, Eigene Gedanken und gesammelte Nachrichten von der Tarantel, welche zur gänzlichen Vertilgung des Vorurtheils von der Schädlichkeit ihres Bisses, und der Heilung desselben durch Musik, dienlich und hinlänglich sind. Observations and statements respecting the Tarantula, which suffice entirely to set aside the prejudice respecting the venom of its bite, as also its cure by music. Berlin, 1772. 8vo. A very shallow criticism.—P. Forest. Observatt. et Curatt. medicinal. Libri 30, 31 et 32. Francof. 1509. fol. Ob. XII. p. 41. diligently compiled from his predecessors.—Phil. Camerar. Operæ horarum subcisivarum. Francof. 1658. 4to. Cent. II. cap. 81. p. 317.—R. Mead, a mechanical account of poisons: London, 1747. 8vo. p. 99. contends for the reality of Tarantism with R. Boyle. An essay of the great effects of even languid and unheeded motion, &c. London, 1685. ch. VI.—So also J. F. Cartheuser, Fundamenta pathologiæ et therapiæ. Francof. a. V. 1758. 8vo. Tom. I. p. 334. Th. Willis de morbis convulsivis. cap. VII. p. 492. Opp. Lugdun. 1681. 4to. According to Gassendi, Ferdinando, Kircher and others.—L. Valetta, de Phalangio Apulo opusculum. Neapol. 1706.—Thom. Cornelio (professor at Naples in the middle of the seventeenth century). Letter to J. Dodington concerning some observations made of persons pretending to be stung by Tarantulas. Phil. Transactions, No. 83. p. 4066. 1672. considers Tarantism to be St. Vitus’s dance.—Jos. Lanzoni, de Venenis, cap. 57. p. 140. Opp. Lausann. 1738. 4to. Tom. I. mostly from Baglivi.—J. Schenk, a Grafenberg. Observatt. Medicar. Lib. VII. Obs. 122. p. 792. Tom. II. Ed. Francof. 1600. 8vo. was himself an eye-witness.—Wolfg. Senguerd, Tractatus physicus de Tarantula. Ludg. Bat. 1668. 12mo.—Herm. Grube, De ictu Tarantulæ et vi musices in eius curatione conjecturæ physico-medicæ. Francof. 1679. 8vo—Athan. Kircher, Musurgia universalis. Rom. 1650. fol. Tom. II. IX. ch. 4. p. 218.—M. Köhler, in den Svenska Vetenskaps Academiens Handlingar. 1758. p. 29. Transactions of the Swedish Academy of Sciences—Berlin Collection for the Furtherance of the Science of Medicine. Vol. V. Pt. I. p. 53. 1772.—Burserii Institutiones medic. pract. tom. III. p. 1. cap. 7. § 219. p. 159. ed. Hecker.—J. S. Halle, Gifthistorie. History of Poisons, Berlin, 1786. 8vo.—Blumenbach, Naturgeschichte, Natural History, p. 412.—E. F. Leonhardt, Diss. de Tarantismo, Berol. 1827. 8vo. and many others.
[115] This may, however, be considered merely as a conjecture, founded upon the following passage in Ludolf’s Lexicon Æthiopic. Ed. 2da. Francof. 1699. fol. p. 142. Astarāgaza, de vexatione quadam diabolica accipitur. Marc. i. 26. ix. 18. Luc. ix. 39. Græcus habet σπαράττειν, vellicare, discerpere. Sed Æthiopes, teste Gregorio, pro morbo quodam accipiunt, quo quis perpetuo pedes agitare et quasi calcitrare cogitur. Fortassis est Saltatio S. Viti, vulgo St. Veitstanz.
[116] The Life and Adventures of Nathaniel Pearce, written by himself, during a residence in Abyssinia, from the year 1810 to 1819. London, 1831. 8vo. Vol. I. ch. ix. p. 290.
[117] The Evangelist and St. John the Baptist have been at all times, and among all nations, confounded with each other, so that the relation of the latter to one and the same phenomenon in such different ages and climates is very probable.
[118] She was a native Greek.
[119] Pearce, p. 289. Compare p. 34.—E. G. Förstemann, Die christlichen Geisslergesellschaften. The Christian Societies of Flagellants. Halle, 1828. 8vo.
[120] Idem, loc. cit.
[121] Among the ancient Greeks βασκήσις. This superstition is more or less developed among all the nations of the earth, and has not yet entirely disappeared from Europe.
[122] Paracelsus.
[123] Gentleman’s Magazine, 1787, March, p. 268.—F. B. Osiander, Ueber die Entwickelungskrankheiten in den Blüthenjahren des weiblichen Geschlechts. On the disorders of young women, &c. Tübingen, 1820, Vol. I. p. 10.
[124] This account is given by Fritze. Hufeland’s Journal der practischen Heilkunde, Vol. XII. 1801. Part I. p. 110. Hufeland’s Journal of Practical Medicine.
[125] Compare J. G. Zimmermann, Ueber die Einsamkeit. Leipsig, 1784. 8vo. Vol. II. ch. 6. p. 77. On Solitude.—J. P. Falret, De l’hypochondrie et du suicide. Paris, 1822. 8vo. and others.
[126] This statement is made by J. Cornish. See Fothergill and Want’s Medical and Physical Journal, vol. xxxi. 1814. pp. 373–379.
[127] Samuel Hibbert, Description of the Shetland Islands, comprising an account of their geology, scenery, antiquities, and superstitions. Edinburgh, 1822. 4to. p. 399.
[128]

About this time the following couplet was circulated:—

About this time, the following couplet was shared:—

“De par le Roi, défense à Dieu
De faire miracle dans ce lieu.”
[129] This kind of assistance was called the “Grands Secours.” Boursier, Mémoire Théologique sur ce qu’on appelle les Secours violens dans les Convulsions. Paris, 1788. 12mo. Many Convulsionnaires were seized with illness in consequence of this singularly erroneous mode of cure. A Dominican friar died from the effects of it—though accidents of this kind were kept carefully concealed. See Renault (parish priest at Vaux, near Auxerre; obiit, 1796), Le Secourisme détruit dans ses fondemens, 1759. 12mo. and Le Mystère d’Iniquité, 1788. 8vo.
[130] Arouet, the father of Voltaire, visited, in Nantes, a celebrated Convulsionnaire, Gabrielle Mollet, whom he found occupied in pulling the bells off a child’s coral, to designate the rejection of the unbelievers. Sometimes she jumped into the water, and barked like a dog. She died in 1748.
[131] J. Phil. Hecquet (obiit 1737). La Naturalisme des Convulsions. Soleure, 1733. 8vo.
[132] De Melancholia et Morbis Melancholicis. Paris, 1765. 2 vols. 8vo.
[133] Especially from 1784 to 1788.
[134] See Grégoire, Histoire des Sectes Religieuses, tome ii. ch. 13. p. 127. Paris, 1828. 8vo. The following words of this meritorious author, on the mental state of his countrymen, are very well worthy of attention. “L’esprit public est dans un état de fluctuation persévérante: des âmes flétries par l’égoïsme n’ont que le caractère de la servitude; l’education viciée ne forme guère que des êtres dégradés; la religion est méconnue ou mal enseignée; la nation présente des symptômes alarmans de sa décrépitude, et présage des malheurs dont on ne peut calculer l’étendue ni la durée.” P. 161.
[135]

“I had occasion to witness at Cairo another species of religious fanaticism. I heard one day, at a short distance from my residence, for several hours together, singing, or more properly crying, so uniform and fatiguing, that I inquired the cause of this singularity. I was told that it was some dervise or monk, who repeated, while dancing on his heels, the name of Allah, till, completely exhausted, he sank down insensible. These unhappy visionaries, in fact, often expire at the end of this holy dance; and the cries of the one whom I heard, having commenced in the afternoon, and continued during the whole of the night, and part of the following morning, I doubt not that his pious enthusiasm cost him his life.”—Recollections of Egypt, by the Baroness Von Minutoli. London, 1827.

"I witnessed a different kind of religious fanaticism in Cairo. One day, not far from my home, I heard singing—or more accurately, wailing—that was so repetitive and exhausting that I asked what was happening. I was told it was a dervish or monk, who while dancing on his heels, kept repeating the name of Allah until he collapsed, completely spent. These unfortunate visionaries often die after this holy dance; and since the cries I heard began in the afternoon and went on through the night and part of the next morning, I have no doubt that his fervent devotion cost him his life."—Recollections of Egypt, by the Baroness Von Minutoli. London, 1827.

In Arabia the same fanatical zeal exists, as we find from the following passage of an anonymous history of the Wahabis, published in Paris, in 1810: “La prière la plus méritoire consiste à crier le nom de Dieu, pendant des heures entières, et le plus saint est celui qui répète ce nom le plus long temps et le plus vite. Rien de plus curieux que le spectacle des Schekhs, qui, dans les fêtes publiques, s’essayent à l’envi, et hurlent le nom d’Allah d’une manière effrayante. La plupart enroués sont forcés de se taire, et abandonnent la palme au sainte à forte poitrine, qui, pour jouir de sa victoire, s’efforce et jette encore quelque cris devant ses rivaux réduits au silence. Epuisé de fatigue, baigné de sueur, il tombe enfin au milieu du peuple dévot, qui s’empresse à le relever et le porte en triomphe. Les principales mosquées retentissent, tous les Vendredis, des cris dictés par cette singulière émulation. Le Schekh, que ses poumons ont sanctifié, conserve son odeur de sainteté par des extases et des transports, souvent dangereux pour les Chrétiens que le hazard en rend témoins malgré cux.”—Transl. note.

In Arabia, the same intense passion is found, as shown in the following excerpt from an anonymous history of the Wahabis, published in Paris in 1810: “The most rewarding prayer is to shout the name of God for hours on end, and the holiest is the one who repeats this name the longest and the fastest. There's nothing more fascinating than the sight of the Sheikhs, who, at public celebrations, compete with each other, shouting the name of Allah in a terrifying way. Most are hoarse and forced to be quiet, leaving the prize to the loudest, who, to enjoy their victory, pushes themselves and shouts even more before their rivals, now silenced. Exhausted and drenched in sweat, they finally collapse among the devoted crowd, who rush to lift them up and carry them in triumph. The main mosques echo every Friday with the shouts driven by this peculiar competition. The Sheikh, who is sanctified by his lungs, maintains his holy scent through ecstasies and frenzied states, which are often dangerous for Christians who happen to witness them, despite them.” —Transl. note.

[136] For examples see Osiander, Entwickelungskrankheiten. Loc. cit. p. 45.
[137] Among 108 cases of insanity, Perfect mentions eleven of mania and methodistical enthusiasm, in nine of which suicide was committed. Annals of Insanity. London, 1808. 8vo.
[138] Harris Rowland and William Williams.
[139] John Evans, Sketch of the Denominations of the Christian World. 13th edition. London, 1814. 12mo. p. 236.—See Grégoire, loc. cit. tome iv. chap. xiii. p. 483.
[140] Mrs. Trollope’s Domestic Manners of the Americans. A Revival, pp. 108–112. Shaking Quakers, pp. 195–196. Camp Meeting, p. 233. London, 2 vols. 1832.—Transl. note.
[141] In Kentucky, assemblies of from ten to twelve thousand have frequently taken place. Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and New York, are also the theatres of these meetings.—Grégoire, tome iv. p. 496.
[142] At one of these camp-meetings a traveller saw above eight hundred persons faint away. Idem. He nowhere met with more frequent instances of suicide in consequence of Demonomania, than in North America.
[143] Idem. p. 498. These are the Barkers. Numerous other convulsive Methodistical sects abound in North America. The Shakers, who are inimical to marriage, would also have been mentioned, were not their contortions much less violent than those of the Jumpers.—See Grégoire, tome v. p. 195. Evans, p. 267.
[144] See Perrin du Lac, Voyage dans les deux Louisianes. Paris, 1805. 8vo. chap. ix. pp. 64, 65. chap. xvii. pp. 128, 129.—Michaud, Voyage à l’ouest des Monts Alleghanys. Paris, 1804. 8vo. p. 212.—John Melish, Travels in the United States of America. Philadelphia, 1812. 8vo. vol. i. p. 26.—Lambert, Travels through Canada and the United States. London, 1810. 8vo. vol. iii. p. 44.—John Howison, Sketches of Upper Canada. Edinburgh, 1822. 8vo. p. 150.—Edward Allen Talbot, Cinq Années de Résidence au Canada. Paris, 1825. 8vo. tome ii. p. 147.
[145] The substance of Nos. III. and IV. having been embodied in the text, it seems only necessary to insert here the original old German, which is couched in language too coarse to admit of translation.—Transl. note.

175

175

THE SWEATING SICKNESS.


177

PREFACE.


The present work is a continuation of my treatises on collateral subjects, and, like them, maintains the opinion, that great epidemics are epochs of development, wherein the mental energies of mankind are exerted in every direction. The history of the world bears indisputable testimony to this fact. The tendencies of the mind, the turn of thought of whole ages, have frequently depended on prevailing diseases; for nothing exercises a more potent influence over man, either in disposing him to calmness and submission, or in kindling in him the wildest passions, than the proximity of inevitable and universal danger. Often have infatuation and fanaticism, hatred and revenge, engendered by an overwhelming fear of death, spread fire and flames throughout the world. Famine and diseases, among which may be instanced the fiery plague of St. Anthony, were no less powerful in calling forth the chivalrous spirit of the crusades than the enthusiastic eloquence of Peter the Hermit—the Black Death brought thousands to the stake, and aroused the fearful penances of the Flagellants—while the oriental leprosy cast a gloomy shade over society throughout the whole course of the middle ages.

The present work is a continuation of my writings on related topics, and, like them, argues that major epidemics are periods of evolution, during which humanity’s mental energies are directed in various ways. The history of the world clearly supports this idea. The mindset and thought patterns of entire eras have often been influenced by prevalent diseases; for nothing has a stronger effect on people, either calming them or igniting their most intense emotions, than the presence of unavoidable and widespread danger. Time and again, obsession and fanaticism, hatred and revenge, fueled by an overwhelming fear of death, have spread chaos across the globe. Famines and diseases, such as the fiery plague of St. Anthony, were just as influential in inspiring the chivalric spirit of the crusades as the passionate speeches of Peter the Hermit—the Black Death led thousands to execution and prompted the intense penitence of the Flagellants—while the eastern leprosy cast a dark shadow over society throughout the Middle Ages.

With all such commotions, the most striking events of the world are in intimate relation, and unquestionably, amid the changing forms of existence in the human race, more has always depended on the prevailing tone of thought than on the rude powers by which those events were produced. The historian, therefore, who would investigate the hidden influence of mind, cannot dispense with medical research. The facts themselves convince him of the organic union of the corporeal and the spiritual in all human affairs, and consequently of the innate vital connexion of all human knowledge. Hence, in a medical point of view, how vast is the field for observation178 presented by the history of popular diseases. Present bodily sufferings[1], are, collectively, but a step in the development,—but one phase of morbid life amid a long series of phenomena, and hence are not fully understood without a previous knowledge of the past, and historical research. How can we recognise the ring of Saturn as such, so long as our axis of vision is in its plane, and we see it only as a line. Great pestilences have vanished or been dispersed; from causes apparently the most insignificant, the most important consequences have resulted, and throughout the vicissitudes of danger and devastation, the operations of mighty laws of nature are everywhere manifested in the social tendencies of entire centuries.

With all this chaos, the most significant events in the world are closely connected, and undoubtedly, amid the changing realities of human existence, more has always relied on the dominant mindset than on the crude forces that brought those events about. Therefore, any historian looking to explore the hidden impact of thought must also consider medical research. The facts themselves demonstrate the organic link between the physical and the spiritual in all human matters, and thus the inherent vital connection of all human knowledge. Consequently, from a medical perspective, the history of common diseases presents an enormous opportunity for observation178. Current physical ailments[1], are collectively just a step in development—merely one aspect of unhealthy life among a long series of phenomena, and therefore are not fully understood without prior knowledge of the past and thorough historical research. How can we recognize the rings of Saturn as such while our line of sight is in its plane, seeing it only as a line? Great plagues have disappeared or been controlled; from seemingly insignificant causes, crucial consequences have emerged, and throughout the ups and downs of danger and destruction, the workings of powerful natural laws are evident in the social trends of entire centuries.

This is no aërial realm of transitory conjectures—facts themselves speak in a thousand reminiscences. If we do but investigate the past with unprejudiced assiduity—if we do but consider even the few successful researches which have hitherto been made in historical pathology, (perhaps those who are kindly disposed will recognise even mine,) we shall not fail to arrive at a centre of reality, which the healing art, to its great detriment, has hitherto been far from reaching, whilst it has occasionally penetrated into a less fertile soil, or even encumbered itself with the accumulated rubbish of the pedantic dogmas of the schools.

This isn't a lofty realm of fleeting ideas—facts themselves resonate in countless memories. If we investigate the past with unbiased diligence—if we take into account even the few successful studies that have been done in historical pathology, (perhaps those who are sympathetic will recognize even my work), we won't fail to find a center of truth, which the healing profession, to its great disadvantage, has yet to reach, while sometimes getting caught up in less fruitful areas or even burdening itself with the accumulated nonsense of outdated theories from academic institutions.

The state, which founds its legislation on a knowledge of realities, which expects from the physical sciences information respecting human life collectively, considered in all its relations, has a right to demand from its physicians a general insight into the nature and causes of popular diseases. Such an insight, however, as is worthy the dignity of a science, cannot be obtained by the observation of isolated epidemics, because nature never in any one of them displays herself in all her bearings, nor brings into action, at one time, more than a few of the laws of general disease. One generation, however rich it may be in stores of important knowledge, is never adequate to establish, on the foundation of actually observed phenomena, a doctrine of popular diseases worthy of the name. The experience of all ages is the source whence we must in this case draw, and medical 179investigation is the only road which leads to this source, unless, indeed, we would be unprepared to meet new epidemics, and would maintain the unfounded opinion that medical science, as it now exists, is the full result of all preceding efforts.

The state, which bases its laws on an understanding of real-world situations, expecting information about human life as a whole from the physical sciences, has the right to require its doctors to have a general understanding of the nature and causes of common diseases. However, a true insight worthy of science can't come from observing individual epidemics, because nature never reveals itself fully in any single case and only shows a few laws of general disease at a time. No generation, no matter how knowledgeable, can create a doctrine of common diseases based solely on observed phenomena that’s worthy of the name. We must draw from the experience of all ages in this case, and medical investigation is the only way to access this source, unless we want to be unprepared for new epidemics and hold the unfounded belief that current medical science encapsulates all past efforts.

An insight, not only into general visitations of disease, which in the course of ages have appeared in divers forms, but also into every single disease, whether it occurs in intimate connexion with others or not, is rendered more distinct by a knowledge of the contemporary circumstances which attend its development. I would fain hope, therefore, that the future research and diligence of physicians devoted to the pursuit of truth and science, will be more generally directed to historical investigation; and that universities and academies will concede to it that prominent place, which, from its high importance, as an extensive branch of natural philosophy, it justly demands.

An understanding of not just general occurrences of diseases that have appeared in various forms over the ages, but also of each specific disease, whether it is linked to others or not, becomes clearer with knowledge of the current circumstances surrounding its development. I hope that in the future, the research and efforts of doctors committed to discovering truth and advancing science will increasingly focus on historical investigation; and that universities and academies will give it the significant recognition it deserves, considering its importance as a major field of natural philosophy.

Whether the following inquiry into one of the most remarkable diseases on record corresponds with these views, I must leave my readers to judge. The historian will discern what social feelings are produced among nations by great events, and to the physician a picture of suffering will be unveiled, to which the diseases of the present time afford no parallel. I have throughout kept in view the spirit and the dignity of the sixteenth century, which was as remarkable for military triumphs as for tragic events; and I look with confidence for the same indulgence and goodwill now, which, through the kindness of friends, I have already enjoyed both at home and abroad, in a higher degree than my sincere gratitude can find words to express.

Whether the following exploration of one of the most extraordinary diseases in history aligns with these views, I'll leave it to my readers to decide. Historians will recognize how major events shape societal feelings among nations, and for physicians, a depiction of suffering will be revealed that today's diseases can't compare to. I've always kept in mind the spirit and dignity of the sixteenth century, a time notable for military victories as well as tragic occurrences; and I hope for the same understanding and goodwill now, which I have already received, thanks to the kindness of friends, both at home and abroad, in a way that exceeds what words of gratitude can convey.


181

181

THE SWEATING SICKNESS.

CHAPTER I.
THE FIRST OUTBREAK OF THE DISEASE—1485.


“Sound drums and trumpets, boldly and cheerfully,
God and Saint George! Richmond and victory!”—Shakespeare.

Sect. 1.—Eruption.

After the fate of England had been decided by the battle of Bosworth, on the 22d of August, 1485[2], the joy of the nation was clouded by a mortal disease which thinned the ranks of the warriors, and following in the rear of Henry’s victorious army, spread in a few weeks from the distant mountains of Wales to the metropolis of the empire. It was a violent inflammatory fever, which, after a short rigor, prostrated the powers as with a blow; and amidst painful oppression at the stomach, headache and lethargic stupor, suffused the whole body with a fetid perspiration. All this took place in the course of a few hours, and the crisis was always over within the space of a day and night[3]. The internal heat which the patient suffered was intolerable, yet every refrigerant was certain death. The people were seized with consternation when they saw that scarcely one in a hundred escaped[4], and their first impression was that 182a reign commencing with such horrors would doubtless prove most inauspicious[5].

After the fate of England was determined by the battle of Bosworth, on August 22, 1485[2], the nation's joy was overshadowed by a deadly disease that weakened the ranks of the soldiers. Following Henry's victorious army, it spread within weeks from the remote mountains of Wales to the capital of the empire. It was a severe inflammatory fever that, after a brief chill, knocked people out as if they had been hit; along with painful stomach issues, headaches, and drowsy stupor, it filled the entire body with a foul sweat. All this happened within a few hours, and the crisis would typically pass within a day and night[3]. The internal heat that patients experienced was unbearable, yet any cooling remedy meant certain death. The people were struck with fear when they saw that barely one in a hundred survived[4], and their initial thought was that a reign beginning with such horrors would surely be very unfortunate[5].

At first the new foe was scarcely heeded; citizens and peasants went in joyful processions to meet the victorious army. Henry’s march from Bosworth towards London resembled a triumph, which was everywhere celebrated by festivals; for the nation, after its many years of civil war, looked forward to happier days than they had enjoyed under the blood-thirsty Richard.

At first, the new enemy was hardly noticed; townspeople and farmers happily gathered to greet the victorious army. Henry’s march from Bosworth to London felt like a celebration, marked by festivals everywhere, as the country, after years of civil war, anticipated better times than those they had under the ruthless Richard.

Very shortly, however, after the king’s entry into the capital on the 28th of August[6], the Sweating Sickness[7], as the disease was called, began to spread its ravages among the densely peopled streets of the city. Two lord mayors and six aldermen died within one week[8], having scarcely laid aside their festive robes; many who had been in perfect health at night, were on the following morning numbered among the dead. The disease for the most part marked for its victims robust and vigorous men; and as many noble families lost their chiefs, extensive commercial houses their principals, and wards their guardians, the festivities were soon converted into grief and mourning. The coronation of the king, which was expected to overcome the scruples that many entertained of his right to the throne, was of necessity postponed in this general distress[9], and the disease, in the mean time, spread without interruption and over the whole kingdom from east to west[10].

Very soon after the king arrived in the capital on August 28[6], the Sweating Sickness[7], as it was known, started to wreak havoc among the crowded streets of the city. Two lord mayors and six aldermen died within a week[8], having barely put their festive clothes aside; many who had been perfectly healthy at night were found among the dead by the next morning. The disease primarily targeted strong and healthy men, and as many noble families lost their leaders, major businesses their heads, and wards their guardians, celebrations quickly turned into sorrow and mourning. The king's coronation, which was expected to silence the doubts about his claim to the throne, had to be postponed due to this widespread crisis[9], while the illness continued to spread uninterrupted throughout the entire kingdom from east to west[10].

It is agreed that the pestilence did not commence till the very beginning of August, 1485, and was in obvious connexion with the circumstances of the times. To return to their native country had long been the ardent desire of the Earl of Richmond and his faithful followers. At the age of 15, (1471,) having escaped the vengeance of the House of York, and the assassins of Edward, he was overtaken by a storm, and fell into the hands of Francis II., Duke of Bretagne, who long detained him prisoner, but on the death of Edward, in 1483, supplied him with means to enforce his claims to the English throne, as the last descendant of the House of Lancaster. This first undertaking miscarried. A storm drove back the bold adventurer 183to Dieppe, and compelled him once more to throw himself, with his five hundred English followers, on the hospitality of Duke Francis. Richard’s influence with the Duke, however, rendered his stay there somewhat dangerous. Richmond withdrew privately, and endeavoured to gain over to his cause Charles VIII., who was yet a minor. A small subsidy of French troops, some pieces of artillery, and an adequate supply of money, were finally granted to his repeated solicitations. This little band was quickly augmented to 2000 men, who were all embarked, and on the 25th of July, 1485, they weighed anchor at Havre, and seven days after, the standard of Richmond was raised in Milford Haven[11].

It is agreed that the plague didn’t start until the very beginning of August, 1485, and was clearly linked to the events of the time. The Earl of Richmond and his loyal followers had longed to return to their homeland. At 15, in 1471, after escaping the wrath of the House of York and the assassins of Edward, he was caught in a storm and captured by Francis II, Duke of Brittany, who kept him imprisoned for a while. However, after Edward's death in 1483, he provided Richmond with resources to pursue his claim to the English throne as the last descendant of the House of Lancaster. This initial attempt failed. A storm forced the bold adventurer 183 back to Dieppe, where he had to rely again on Duke Francis’s hospitality. Nevertheless, Richard's influence with the Duke made his stay there a bit risky. Richmond left quietly and sought to win over Charles VIII, who was still a minor. After many requests, he was granted a small troop of French soldiers, some artillery, and enough funding. This small group quickly grew to 2,000 men, all of whom were boarded, and on July 25, 1485, they set sail from Havre, raising Richmond's banner in Milford Haven seven days later.[11].

They landed at the village of Dale, on the west side of the harbour, and on the evening of their arrival, or very early on the following morning, Richmond hastened to Haverfordwest, where no messenger had yet announced the renewal of the civil war. It appears that he reached Cardigan, on the northern shore, on the 3d of August, and for the first time granted to his small but increasing army the repose of an encampment.

They arrived at the village of Dale, on the west side of the harbor, and on the evening of their arrival, or very early the next morning, Richmond hurried to Haverfordwest, where no messenger had yet reported the start of the civil war again. It seems that he got to Cardigan, on the northern shore, on August 3rd, and for the first time allowed his small but growing army some rest in a camp.

After a short halt, he set forward with confidence, crossed the Severn at Shrewsbury[12], turned from thence to Newport and Stafford, and pitched his camp at Litchfield, probably before the 18th of August[13]. The distance to this place from Milford Haven is 170 miles, and the road leads over wooded mountains and cultivated fields, without touching upon any swampy lands. Litchfield, however, lies low, and it was here that the army encamped in a damp situation, till it broke up for the neighbouring field of Bosworth. Thither Richmond, with scarcely 5000 men, and having his right wing covered by a morass, went to meet his deadly foe, whose army doubled his own. The combat was at first furious, but in two hours Lord Stanley crowned the conqueror with Richard’s diadem[14].

After a brief stop, he moved forward confidently, crossed the Severn at Shrewsbury[12], then headed to Newport and Stafford, and set up camp at Litchfield, likely before August 18th[13]. The distance from Milford Haven to this spot is 170 miles, and the route goes over forested mountains and cultivated fields, without passing through any marshy areas. Litchfield, however, is situated low, and it was here that the army camped in a damp place until they left for the nearby field of Bosworth. There, Richmond, with barely 5,000 men and his right flank protected by a swamp, went to face his formidable enemy, whose army was twice as large. The battle started off fiercely, but in two hours, Lord Stanley placed Richard’s crown on the head of the victor[14].

All these events so rapidly succeeded each other in the course of three weeks, that the knights and soldiers of Richmond, 184more and more excited every day by fear and hope, were scarcely equal to such exertions. Yet the very rapidity of the movements of the army was the cause why the disease could not spread so quickly, nor obstruct the final decision of Bosworth, although the report of it had already, before this event, spread universal terror; so that Lord Stanley, when authoritatively summoned by Richard to repair to his standard, sought to gain time, and, by way of excuse, alleged the prevalence of the new disease[15].

All these events happened so quickly over the course of three weeks that the knights and soldiers of Richmond, 184 growing more anxious each day because of fear and hope, were barely able to keep up with the demands. Yet, the speed of the army's movements was the reason why the disease couldn't spread as fast or hinder the final outcome at Bosworth, even though news of it had already spread widespread fear beforehand. Lord Stanley, when summoned by Richard to join his side, tried to buy time and used the excuse of the outbreak of the new disease[15].

After the victory of Bosworth, King Henry remained two days in Leicester, and then without further delay hastened to London, which he reached in less than four days, unaccompanied by military parade, and attended only by a select body of followers. The remainder of his army, which stood greatly in need of repose after its severe toils, were not in a condition for marching, they therefore halted in the neighbouring towns, and were probably disbanded, according to the custom of the age[16].

After the victory at Bosworth, King Henry stayed in Leicester for two days and then quickly made his way to London, arriving in less than four days. He didn't have a military display with him and was only accompanied by a small group of followers. The rest of his army, needing rest after their hard efforts, wasn't ready to march, so they stopped in the nearby towns and were likely disbanded, as was customary at the time.[16]

The Sweating Sickness is said not to have made its appearance in London till the 21st of September[17], but historians have most likely intended by that day to mark the commencement of its virulence, which continued to the end of the following month, and lasted, therefore, in all, about five weeks.

The Sweating Sickness is believed to have first appeared in London on September 21[17], but historians probably use that date to indicate when it started being particularly severe, which lasted until the end of the following month, totaling about five weeks.

During this short period a large portion of the population[18] fell victims to the new epidemic, and the lamentation was without bounds so long as the people were ignorant that this fearful disease, unable to establish its dominion, would only pass through the country like a flash of lightning, and then again give place to the active intercourse of society and the cheering hope of life.

During this brief time, a significant part of the population[18] succumbed to the new epidemic, and the mourning was overwhelming as long as people remained unaware that this terrifying disease, unable to take hold, would only sweep through the country like a flash of lightning, and then make way for the lively interactions of society and the uplifting hope of life.

There was no security against a second attack; for many who 185had recovered were seized by it, with equal violence, a second, and sometimes a third time, so that they had not even the slender consolation enjoyed by sufferers in the plague[19] and small-pox, of entire immunity after having once surmounted the danger[20].

There was no protection against a second attack; many who 185 had recovered were hit by it again, just as violently, a second, and sometimes a third time, so they didn’t even have the small comfort that those suffering from the plague[19] and smallpox experienced, of being completely immune after surviving the danger[20].

Thus by the end of the year the disease had spread over the whole of England, and visited every place with the same severity as the metropolis. Many persons of rank, of the ecclesiastical and the civil classes, became its victims; and great was the consternation when, in the month of August, it broke out in Oxford. Professors and students fled in all directions: but death overtook many of them, and this celebrated university was deserted for six weeks[21]. Three months later it appeared at Croyland, and on the 14th of November, carried off Lambert Fossedyke, abbot of the monastery[22]. No authentic accounts from other quarters have been handed down to our times, but we may infer, from the general grief and anxiety which prevailed, that the loss of human life was very considerable.

By the end of the year, the disease had spread all over England, affecting every place with the same intensity as the capital. Many high-ranking individuals from both the church and government became its victims; there was great panic when it broke out in Oxford in August. Professors and students fled in all directions, but many of them were caught by death, leaving this famous university empty for six weeks[21]. Three months later, it showed up in Croyland, and on November 14th, it claimed the life of Lambert Fossedyke, the abbot of the monastery[22]. There are no verified accounts from other areas that have been passed down, but we can assume, based on the widespread grief and worry, that the loss of life was quite significant.

Sect. 2.—The Physicians.

The physicians could do little or nothing for the people in this extremity[23]. They are nowhere alluded to throughout this epidemic, and even those who might have come forward to succour their fellow citizens, had fallen into the errors of Galen, and their dialectic minds sank under this appalling phenomenon. This holds good even of the famous Thomas Linacre, subsequently physician in ordinary to two monarchs[24], and founder of the College of Physicians, in 1518. In the prime of his youth he had been an eye-witness of the events at Oxford, and survived even the second and third eruption of the Sweating Sickness; but in none of his writings do we find a single word respecting this disease, which is of such permanent importance. In fact, the restorers of the medical science of ancient 186Greece, who were followed by all the most enlightened men in Europe, with the single exception of Linacre, occupied themselves rather with the ancient terms of art than with actual observation, and in their critical researches overlooked the important events that were passing before their eyes[25]. This reminds us of the later Greek physicians, who for four hundred years paid no attention to the small-pox, because they could find no description of it in the immortal works of Galen[26].

The doctors could do very little for the people in this situation[23]. They are not mentioned at all during this epidemic, and even those who might have stepped up to help their fellow citizens had fallen into the mistakes of Galen, and their logical minds were overwhelmed by this horrifying phenomenon. This was also true for the well-known Thomas Linacre, who later became the physician for two monarchs[24] and founded the College of Physicians in 1518. In his youth, he witnessed the events at Oxford and even survived both the second and third outbreaks of the Sweating Sickness; however, there is not a single mention of this disease in any of his writings, which is quite significant. In fact, the revivers of the medical science of ancient 186 Greece, who were followed by all the most educated men in Europe, except for Linacre, focused more on ancient technical terms than on real observation, and in their critical studies, they ignored the significant events happening right in front of them[25]. This is reminiscent of the later Greek doctors, who for four hundred years ignored smallpox because they couldn't find any description of it in the enduring works of Galen[26].

No resource was therefore left to the terrified people of England but their own good sense, and this led them to the adoption of a plan of treatment, than which no physician in the world could have given them a better; namely, not to resort to any violent medicines, but to apply moderate heat, to abstain from food, taking only a small quantity of mild drink, and quietly to wait for four-and-twenty hours the crisis of this formidable malady. Those who were attacked during the day, in order to avoid any chill, immediately went to bed in their clothes, and those who sickened by night did not rise from their beds in the morning; while all carefully avoided exposing to the air even a hand or foot. Thus they anxiously guarded against heat or cold, so as not to excite perspiration by the former, nor to check it by the latter—for they well knew that either was certain death[27].

No resource was left to the frightened people of England except their own good judgment, which led them to adopt a treatment plan that no doctor in the world could have improved upon. They decided not to use any harsh medicines, but instead to use moderate warmth, refrain from eating, consume only a small amount of mild drinks, and patiently wait for twenty-four hours for the crisis of this serious illness to pass. Those who fell ill during the day immediately went to bed in their clothes to avoid getting cold, while those who got sick at night stayed in bed in the morning. Everyone took care not to expose even a hand or foot to the air. They worriedly guarded against both heat and cold to avoid causing sweating from the former or stopping it from the latter, knowing that either could lead to certain death[27].

The report of the infallibility of this method soon spread over the whole kingdom, and thus towards the commencement of 1486, many were rescued from death. On New Year’s Day, a violent tempest arose in the south-east, and by purifying the atmosphere relieved the oppression under which the people laboured, and thus, to the joy of the whole nation, the epidemic was swept away without leaving a trace behind[28].

The news about how effective this method was quickly spread throughout the entire kingdom, and by the beginning of 1486, many people were saved from death. On New Year’s Day, a fierce storm hit the southeast, and it cleared the air, easing the burden that people had been feeling. As a result, the epidemic was completely eliminated, bringing joy to the whole nation without a trace left behind[28].

187

187

Sect. 3.—Causes.

It was thought remarkable, even at that time, that the Sweating Sickness did not extend beyond the limits of England, and that, remaining the unenviable property of that nation, it did not even spread to Scotland, Ireland, or Calais which belonged to Britain. Much, doubtless, was owing to the peculiarity of the climate, more still to atmospherical changes, and something also to the habits of the people and the circumstances of the times. It plainly appeared in the sequel that the English Sweating Sickness was a spirit of the mist, which hovered amid the dark clouds. Even in ordinary years, the atmosphere of England is loaded with these clouds during considerable periods, and in damp seasons they would prove the more injurious to health, as the English of those times were not accustomed to cleanliness, moderation in their diet, or even comfortable refinements. Gluttony was common among the nobility as well as among the lower classes; all were immoderately addicted to drinking[29], and the manners of the age sanctioned this excess at their banquets and their festivities. If we consider that the disease mostly attacked strong and robust men—that portion of the people who abandoned themselves without restraint to all the pleasures of the table—while women, old men, and children, almost entirely escaped, it is obvious that a gross indulgence of the appetite must have had a considerable share in the production of this unparalleled plague.

It was considered remarkable, even at that time, that the Sweating Sickness didn't spread beyond the borders of England, and that, remaining the unfortunate issue of that nation, it didn't even reach Scotland, Ireland, or Calais, which were part of Britain. Much of this was likely due to the unique climate, even more so to atmospheric changes, and also to the habits of the people and the circumstances of the times. It became clear later that the English Sweating Sickness was like a spirit in the mist, floating among the dark clouds. Even in normal years, the air in England is filled with these clouds for long periods, and during damp seasons, they would be more harmful to health, especially since the English of that time weren’t used to cleanliness, moderation in their diets, or even comfortable living standards. Gluttony was common among both the nobility and the lower classes; everyone excessively indulged in drinking, and the social norms of the time accepted this excess at their feasts and celebrations. If we note that the disease mainly targeted strong and healthy men—those who freely indulged in all the pleasures of the table—while women, older men, and children were largely unaffected, it’s clear that excess in appetites must have played a significant role in causing this unmatched plague.

To this may be added, the humidity of the year 1485, which is represented by most chronicles as very remarkable[30]. Throughout the whole of Europe the rain fell in torrents, and inundations were frequent. Damp weather is not prejudicial to health if it be merely temporary, but if the rain be excessive for a series of years, so that the ground is completely saturated, and the mists attract baneful exhalations out of the earth, man must necessarily suffer from the noxious state of the soil and atmosphere. Under these circumstances epidemics must inevitably follow. The five preceding years had been unusually wet[31], 1485 proved equally so; the last hot and droughty summer was that of 1479[32]. Extensive inundations of the Tiber, the Po, the Danube, 188the Rhine, and most of the other great rivers, took place in 1480, and were attended with the usual consequences, the deterioration of the air, misery and disease[33]. The greatest inundation ever remembered in England was that of the Severn, in October, 1483. It was long afterwards called the Duke of Buckingham’s Great Water[34], because it frustrated the rebellion of this powerful subject against Richard III., whom he had been instrumental in placing upon the throne; and consequently defeated also the first enterprise of Henry VII. It lasted full ten days, and the tremendous ravages occasioned by the overwhelming torrent dwelt long in the memory of the people.

To this, we can add the humidity of the year 1485, which most records highlight as quite remarkable[30]. Across Europe, rain fell heavily, and flooding was common. Damp weather isn't harmful to health if it's just temporary, but if it rains excessively for several years, saturating the ground completely, and the mists draw harmful vapors from the earth, people will inevitably suffer from the toxic conditions of the soil and air. In these situations, epidemics are bound to follow. The five years leading up to this had been unusually wet[31], and 1485 was no different; the last hot and dry summer was in 1479[32]. In 1480, there were extensive floods of the Tiber, the Po, the Danube, 188, the Rhine, and many other major rivers, which resulted in the usual consequences: a decline in air quality, suffering, and disease[33]. The worst flood ever recorded in England occurred on the Severn in October 1483. It was long afterward referred to as the Duke of Buckingham’s Great Water[34], because it thwarted this powerful noble's rebellion against Richard III., the king he had helped to bring to power, and thus also defeated the initial efforts of Henry VII. The flooding lasted a full ten days, and the severe damage caused by the overwhelming torrent stayed in the public's memory for a long time.

Sect. 4.—Other Epidemics.

During the whole of this period the nations of Europe were visited with various and destructive plagues. In 1477, the Bubo-plague broke out in Italy, and raged without interruption till 1485[35]. It was accompanied by striking natural phenomena, among which we may reckon an enormous flight of locusts in 1478[36] and 1482, and remarkable inter-current diseases, such as inflammatory pain in the side, throughout the whole of Italy in 1482[37]. In Switzerland and Southern Germany malignant epidemics[38] appeared in the train of drought and famine in 1480 and 1481, while putrid fever accompanied by phrenites[39], prevailed in Westphalia, Hesse and Friesland. There had never been in the memory of the inhabitants of these districts so many ignes fatui as during this period. There too the people suffered from the failure of the harvest, so that it was necessary to obtain supplies from Thuringen[40]. France, where, under the fearful reign of Louis XI., oppression and misery seemed to mock the gifts of heaven, became in 1482, after a two 189years’ scarcity, the scene of a devastating plague. It was an inflammatory fever with delirium, accompanied by such intense pain in the head, that many dashed out their brains against the wall, or rushed into the water; while others, after incessantly running to and fro, died in a state of the greatest agony. According to the notion of the age, this disease was attributed to astral influences, for it could not have been brought on only by famine, which left to the poor peasantry, south of the Loire, nothing but the roots of wild herbs to support their miserable existence[41], since the higher classes were also frequently attacked[42]. This fever was without doubt accompanied by inflammation of the meninges, or even of the brain itself, and was, perhaps, identical with that which at the same period desolated the north-west of Germany as far as the shores of the North Sea, only that it was heightened by the greater natural vivacity and miserable situation of the French people, who were kept in a state of perpetual dread by the cruel executions of Louis[43]. This pestilence occasioned the king to follow the advice of his morose physician[44] in ordinary, and to keep himself closely confined within the town of Plessis des Tours. It was prohibited under a heavy penalty to speak in his presence of death which was carrying off its victims in all directions, and forty crossbowmen kept guard in the fosse of the castle to put to death every living thing which might approach[45]. Two years after, in 1484, virulent 190diseases[46] again visited Germany and Switzerland; and thus it seemed as if the nations were everywhere threatened with death and destruction.

During this entire period, the nations of Europe faced various and devastating plagues. In 1477, the bubo plague erupted in Italy and raged without interruption until 1485[35]. It was accompanied by alarming natural events, including a massive locust swarm in 1478[36] and 1482, as well as notable concurrent illnesses, like severe side pain, which spread throughout Italy in 1482[37]. In Switzerland and southern Germany, deadly epidemics[38] followed drought and famine in 1480 and 1481, while putrid fever, accompanied by inflammation of the brain[39], was prevalent in Westphalia, Hesse, and Friesland. The people in these regions had never witnessed as many ignes fatui as during this time. The harvests failed, necessitating the need for supplies from Thuringen[40]. In France, under the oppressive rule of Louis XI, where suffering and hardship seemed to mock the blessings of nature, a devastating plague struck in 1482 after two years of shortages. It was an inflammatory fever with delirium, causing such unbearable head pain that many people bashed their heads against walls or jumped into water; others, after running around frantically, died in extreme agony. People at the time believed this illness was caused by astrological influences, as it couldn't have been solely due to famine, which left poor peasants south of the Loire with nothing but the roots of wild plants to sustain their miserable lives[41], as the upper classes were also often affected[42]. This fever undoubtedly involved inflammation of the meninges or even the brain itself, and was possibly the same illness that devastated north-western Germany up to the North Sea, but was perhaps intensified by the more intense conditions and desperate situation of the French people, who lived in constant fear of the brutal executions by Louis[43]. This plague led the king to heed the advice of his gloomy personal physician[44] and remain closely confined within the town of Plessis des Tours. Anyone mentioning death, which was claiming victims everywhere, faced heavy penalties, and forty crossbowmen guarded the castle ditch to kill any living thing that got too close[45]. Two years later, in 1484, virulent diseases[46] struck Germany and Switzerland again; it seemed like the nations were universally faced with death and destruction.

Sect. 5.—Richmond’s Army.

From these data, which might easily be extended[47], it is evident that the Sweating Sickness of 1485 did not make its appearance without great and general premisory events, which for a series of years imparted to the people of England a susceptibility to dangerous and unusual diseases. If, besides this, we take into account the gloomy temperament of the English, and the general depression of their spirits, in consequence of the sanguinary wars of the red and white roses, a series of events which seems to have shaken their faith in an overruling Providence, we may readily conceive that it would require but a very slight impulse to excite a powerful commotion in the mysterious mechanism of the human body. This impulse was evidently given by the landing of Richmond’s army in the very year when great and portentous evils were anticipated; for on the 16th of March, the same day when Queen Ann, the unfortunate wife of Richard III., expired, a total eclipse of the sun enveloped all Europe in darkness, and gave rise to gloomy prognostications[48]. Even under ordinary circumstances, wars beget pestilential disorders—how much more inevitably must these have arisen in the then existing state of affairs! Richmond’s army consisted not of brave men animated by zeal to avenge their dishonoured country or to serve a good cause. It was composed of wandering freebooters, “vile landskneckte,” as they were called in Germany, who assembled under his banner at Havre,—sharpshooters formed under Louis XI., who recklessly pillaged Normandy, and whom Charles VIII. gladly made over to Henry, in order to free his own peaceful territories from so great a scourge[49]. This army may not have been worse than 191others of the same period[50]; but cooped up as they were for a whole week in dirty ships, they doubtless carried about with them all the material for germinating the seeds of a pestilential disorder, which broke out soon after on the banks of the Severn and in the camp at Litchfield.

From this data, which could easily be expanded[47], it's clear that the Sweating Sickness of 1485 didn't appear without significant and widespread warning signs, which for several years made the people of England more susceptible to dangerous and unusual diseases. Additionally, if we consider the dark mood of the English and the overall decline in their spirits due to the brutal Wars of the Roses, a series of events that seemed to shake their faith in a higher power, it's easy to understand that it would take just a small trigger to cause a strong reaction in the body's mysterious workings. This trigger was clearly provided by Richmond’s army landing in the very year when dire and ominous events were expected; for on March 16, the same day that Queen Ann, the unfortunate wife of Richard III, died, a total eclipse of the sun cast darkness over all of Europe and sparked gloomy predictions[48]. Normally, wars lead to outbreaks of disease—just imagine how much more inevitable this must have been in the circumstances of that time! Richmond's army wasn't made up of courageous men eager to avenge their dishonored country or to fight for a noble cause. Instead, it was composed of wandering mercenaries, “vile landskneckte,” as they were referred to in Germany, who gathered under his banner at Havre—sharpshooters trained under Louis XI, who recklessly plundered Normandy, and whom Charles VIII happily handed over to Henry to rid his own peaceful territories of such a scourge[49]. This army may not have been worse than 191others of the same time[50]; but confined as they were for an entire week in filthy ships, they undoubtedly carried with them all the potential to spread the germs of a pestilential disease, which soon broke out along the banks of the Severn and in the camp at Lichfield.

Sect. 6.—Nature of the Sweating Sickness.

PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION.

Before we proceed further, some account is here required of the nature of this disease. It was an inflammatory rheumatic fever, with great disorder of the nervous system. This assumption is supported by the manner of its origin and its especial characteristic of being accompanied by a profuse and injurious perspiration. From the judgment that we are now capable of forming of the pernicious influences which prevailed in the year 1485, it may, without hesitation, be admitted that the humidity of that and of the preceding years affected the functions of the lungs and of the skin, and disturbed the relation of this very important tissue to the internal organs of life. This is the usual commencement of rheumatic fevers, which bear the same relation to the Sweating Sickness as slight symptoms bear to severe ones of the same kind. The predominance of affections of the brain and of the nerves, however, gave to the English epidemic a peculiar character. The functions of the eighth pair of nerves were violently disordered in this disease, as was shewn by oppressed respiration and extreme anxiety with nausea and vomiting, symptoms to which the moderns attach much importance[51]. The stupor and profound lethargy shew that there was injury of the brain, to which, in all probability, was added a stagnation of black blood in the torpid veins. We must also take into the account a previous corruption and decomposition of the blood, which, even if we should be disinclined to infer their existence from the offensive perspiration of the disease itself, were proved by striking phenomena of a similar nature that occurred in Central Europe about the same time; for the scurvy prevailed as an epidemic, more especially 192in Germany, in the year 1486, and with such severe and unusual symptoms, that people were inclined to regard it as a totally new malady[52]. Now such is the vital connexion of different functions that every impediment to respiration, whether in consequence of pressure from without, or through spasm and irritation of the nerves from within, or even from a morbid condition of the circulating fluid, infallibly calls forth the compensating activity of the skin, and the body becomes suffused with an alleviating perspiration.

Before we go any further, we need to discuss the nature of this disease. It was an inflammatory rheumatic fever, which caused significant disruption to the nervous system. This conclusion is backed by how it originated and its defining feature of causing excessive and harmful sweating. Based on what we now understand about the harmful influences in 1485, we can confidently say that the humidity of that year and the one before affected lung and skin functions and upset the relationship of this vital tissue with the internal organs. This is the typical onset of rheumatic fevers, which relate to the Sweating Sickness in the same way that mild symptoms relate to more severe ones of the same type. However, the prominence of brain and nerve issues gave this English epidemic a unique character. The functions of the eighth pair of nerves were seriously disrupted in this disease, as indicated by troubled breathing and severe anxiety accompanied by nausea and vomiting—symptoms that modern medicine considers quite significant[51]. The stupor and deep lethargy indicate that there was damage to the brain, likely compounded by a stagnation of dark blood in the sluggish veins. We also need to consider a previous deterioration and breakdown of the blood, which, even if we’re hesitant to infer from the foul sweating associated with the disease itself, is evidenced by strikingly similar phenomena that occurred in Central Europe around the same time; for instance, scurvy was rampant, particularly 192in Germany in 1486, showing such severe and unusual symptoms that people thought it was an entirely new disease[52]. Now, because of the vital connection between different bodily functions, any obstruction to breathing—whether due to external pressure, spasm and irritation of the nerves from inside, or even from an abnormal condition of the circulating blood—inevitably triggers a compensating reaction from the skin, leading to a relieving perspiration across the body.

Thus it plainly appears that the profuse perspiration in the disease of which we are treating, notwithstanding its apparently injurious tendency, was the result of a commotion excited on the part of the lungs, which was critical with respect to the disease itself; and this is in accordance with all the causes of which we still have any knowledge. Noxious and even stinking fogs penetrated into the organs of respiration, and as the blood was thus so much affected in its composition and in its vitality that its corrupt state was only to be obviated by profuse perspiration, the inevitable consequence was an interference with the extensive functions of the eighth pair of nerves, which interference, as later writers relate, extended in many cases to the spinal marrow, and brought on violent convulsions[53]. We have here only one essential cause, out of many, for this gigantic disease, and one too which accounts for its advance and spread. It is highly probable, for the reasons stated, and as according with all human experience, that it first broke out in the army of Henry the VIIth, and beyond all doubt that it spread from west to east, and afterwards in a retrograde course from east to west. With the perfectly equable operation of the predisposing causes, from which the disease ought indubitably to have broken out all over England at the same time, had the condition of the atmosphere been its sole occasion, we must additionally presume a special cause for its progress through towns and villages. This, according to all appearance, was to be found in the air, impregnated with foul odours, which surrounded the sick, and abounded in the tents and dwellings in 193which Henry the VIIth’s soldiers, after various privations and hard service, amid storms and rain, were closely crowded together. Of both causes modern observation furnishes analogous examples. Intermittent fevers spread more easily in air which is contaminated by sick people, and bands of soldiers, themselves in perfect health, have not unfrequently conveyed camp fever to remote places. It signifies very little by what expressions of the schools these occurrences are designated; it is best perhaps to abstain from them altogether, for they are all inadequate, and occasion misconceptions. Contemporaries, however, were certainly justified in not admitting the notion of contagion in the same sense as when the term is applied to the plague, with which they were well acquainted[54]. For very frequently cases which were not to be explained on the principle of contagion communicated by persons diseased, occurred among people of rank, and manifestly arose independently of the usual causes. In these cases the fear of death, which everywhere was the harbinger of the disease, and threw the nerves of the chest into spasmodic commotion, gave an impulse to the malady for which the quality of the atmosphere and luxury had long made preparation. Had this view of contemporaries been even less impartial than it really was, it would have found the most striking confirmation in the sudden cessation of the pestilence throughout the whole country. For the destructive spirits of air, which would not have been discerned even by the proud naturalists of the nineteenth century, dispersed and vanished for half an age in the fury of the tempest which raged on the 1st of January, 1486.

Thus it clearly shows that the excessive sweating in the illness we're discussing, despite its seemingly harmful effects, was a reaction from the lungs, which was crucial to the disease itself; and this aligns with all the causes we still understand. Toxic and even foul-smelling fogs infiltrated the respiratory organs, and since the blood was greatly impacted in both its makeup and vitality, its deteriorated state could only be mitigated by heavy sweating. The unavoidable result was an interference with the broad functions of the eighth pair of nerves, which, as later writers note, often affected the spinal cord and led to severe convulsions[53]. We have here just one key cause, among many, for this massive disease, and one that explains its spread and escalation. It's highly likely, for the reasons mentioned, and consistent with all human experience, that it first emerged in the army of Henry VII, and without a doubt, it spread from west to east, and then in reverse from east to west. With the uniform influence of the predisposing factors, from which the disease should undoubtedly have erupted all over England simultaneously if the atmospheric condition was its only cause, we must also consider a particular reason for its progression through towns and villages. This, seemingly, was rooted in the air, tainted with foul odors, surrounding the sick and prevalent in the tents and homes where Henry VII's soldiers, after enduring various hardships and battling through storms and rain, were closely packed together. Modern observations provide similar examples of both causes. Intermittent fevers spread more easily in environments polluted by the ill, and groups of soldiers, themselves perfectly healthy, have often transmitted camp fever to distant locations. It matters little what terminology the scholars use to describe these events; it might be better to avoid them altogether, as they are all insufficient and lead to misunderstandings. However, the people of that time were justified in not accepting the idea of contagion in the same manner it’s applied to the plague, with which they were familiar[54]. For often, cases that couldn't be explained by the principle of contagion from sick individuals appeared among the upper class and clearly arose independently of the typical causes. In these instances, the fear of death, which foreshadowed the disease everywhere and caused the chest nerves to go into spasmodic distress, gave rise to the illness for which the conditions of the atmosphere and luxury had long prepared. Even if the perspective of that era had been less impartial than it was, it would have found the most striking evidence in the sudden halt of the plague across the entire country. For the destructive elements in the air, which even the proud naturalists of the nineteenth century would not have recognized, dispersed and disappeared for half a century in the chaos of the storm that raged on January 1, 1486.


CHAPTER II.
THE SECOND OUTBREAK OF THE DISEASE.—1506.


“The times were rough and full of mutations and rare incidents.”—Bacon.

Sect. 1.—Mercenary Troops.

At the commencement of the sixteenth century, society was very differently constituted from what it was at the period when 194 Henry the VIIth unfurled his banner for victory. The darkness of the middle ages had receded, as at the approach of a sun still hidden behind a cloud. The mind unconsciously expanded in the unwonted light of day—the whole earth was on the eve of renovation—new energies were to be called into action—events more stupendous had never occurred, nor had more creative ideas ever aroused the spirit of man. The invention of Gutenberg burst through the bonds of mental darkness, and gave to freedom of thought imperishable wings; unsuspected powers successively developed themselves; and, while in Western Europe an ardent desire arose boldly to overstep the ancient limits of human activity, the hopes of the more enlightened fell far short of the actual result of such unexpected events. The discovery of the New World, and the circumnavigation of Africa, laid the foundation for great improvements; yet the events in Central Europe, though less striking to contemporaries, were in their consequences, infinitely more important and beneficial. The establishment of civil order among all the nations of the West took place at this period, which forms so important a boundary between the middle ages and modern times. Regal power was fixed on a firm basis, and when the castles had fallen before the artillery of the princes and imperial cities, so that the petty feudal barons were compelled to swear obedience to the laws, an end was put to the incessant predatory feuds which had so long desolated Europe, and the establishment of internal peace was followed by the security of life and property—the first essential of refinement in manners and of the free development of human society.

At the start of the sixteenth century, society was very different from what it had been when 194 Henry VII raised his banner for victory. The darkness of the Middle Ages had faded, like the approach of a sun still hidden behind a cloud. The mind unconsciously expanded in the new light of day—the whole world was on the brink of renewal—new energies were about to be unleashed—never before had such monumental events occurred, nor had more innovative ideas ever inspired the human spirit. Gutenberg's invention broke through the chains of mental darkness, granting freedom of thought unending wings; previously unnoticed powers began to emerge; and, while in Western Europe there was a strong desire to push past the old limits of human activity, the hopes of the more enlightened fell short of the actual outcomes of such surprising events. The discovery of the New World and the circumnavigation of Africa laid the groundwork for significant improvements; yet the happenings in Central Europe, though less impressive to those at the time, were ultimately much more significant and beneficial. The establishment of civil order among all the nations of the West occurred during this time, which marks an important boundary between the Middle Ages and modern times. Regal power was firmly established, and when the castles fell to the artillery of princes and imperial cities, forcing the small feudal barons to pledge obedience to the laws, it brought an end to the endless predatory feuds that had long ravaged Europe, leading to internal peace and the security of life and property—the first essential of civilized behavior and the free development of human society.

This great result of a concatenation of circumstances was not, however, brought about without violent struggles and innovations, the effects of which were felt for centuries; but it was probably the establishment of standing armies which had the greatest influence on European civilization. They became indeed the pillars of civil order, but having proceeded immediately from the pernicious mercenary system, they long nourished the seeds of unrestrained depravity, and transmitted to later generations the corruptions of the middle ages. The Lansquenets[55] (Landsknechte) of the emperor, and the mercenaries of the kings 195of France and England, who, during the war, had joined the smaller branches of the standing army, were homeless adventurers from every country in Europe, and were allured, not by military ambition, but solely by the prospect of booty[56]. In whatever country the drum beat to arms, they flocked together like swarms of locusts—no one knew from whence—and defying the feeble restraints of military discipline, indulged, during the continuance of the war, in all the unbridled licence of a predatory life.

This significant result of a series of circumstances didn't happen without intense struggles and changes, the effects of which were felt for centuries; but it was probably the establishment of standing armies that had the most impact on European civilization. They truly became the foundations of civil order, but since they emerged directly from the harmful mercenary system, they long sustained the seeds of uncontrolled depravity and passed on to later generations the corruptions of the Middle Ages. The Lansquenets[55] (Landsknechte) of the emperor, and the mercenaries of the kings 195 of France and England, who during the war had joined the smaller units of the standing army, were homeless adventurers from all over Europe, lured not by military ambition, but purely by the prospect of loot[56]. Wherever the drum sounded for battle, they gathered like swarms of locusts—no one knew where they came from—and disregarding the weak constraints of military discipline, indulged in all the unchecked freedom of a predatory lifestyle during the war.

Hence the unbounded barbarity of their mode of warfare, which was restrained only by the individual exertions of more humane commanders. There was, however, a decided contrariety between this system and the moral condition of the people of Western Europe: a contrariety which was never entirely removed by the subsequent introduction of a more strict military discipline, and which has been done away only in modern times, by the establishment of regular armies on a system more congenial to the feelings of the people. Hence the consequences were the more pernicious, for when the armies were disbanded on the conclusion of peace, the Landsknechts dispersed in all directions, not to follow the plough again, or to resume their former occupations, but to pass their time in idleness and dissipation, if enriched by booty, and if reduced to poverty by intemperance and gambling, to infest the country as mendicants or robbers, till a new war again summoned them from their dishonourable mode of life[57]. Probably but very few were ever able to rise from such deep degradation, and many fell early victims to their vices[58], while the infection of their example brought fresh accessions from every town and village to the mercenary legions.

Thus, the extreme brutality of their way of fighting was only kept in check by the individual efforts of more compassionate leaders. However, there was a clear contradiction between this approach and the moral state of the people in Western Europe: a contradiction that was never fully resolved by the later introduction of stricter military discipline and has only recently been addressed with the formation of regular armies that better align with the people's values. As a result, the consequences were even more damaging, because when the armies disbanded after peace was achieved, the Landsknechts scattered in all directions, not to return to farming or their previous jobs, but to spend their time in idleness and excess. If they were enriched by loot, they indulged themselves; if they fell into poverty due to excess and gambling, they roamed the countryside as beggars or thieves until a new war called them back to their dishonorable lives[57]. Probably very few were ever able to escape such deep degradation, and many quickly became victims of their own vices[58], while the corruption of their behavior attracted new recruits from every town and village to the mercenary armies.

196

196

Sect. 2.—New Circumstances.

It is evident that in such a condition of affairs, the effect which the plague produced on civil society must have been different from that of former times. Pernicious influences which, during the middle ages, had endangered the health of the inhabitants of towns, and had often rendered disorders, naturally slight, in the highest degree malignant, were for ever removed. Under this head may be mentioned more particularly the ill-contrived construction of the houses and streets, which even yet, in large cities, destroys the comfort of the inhabitants of whole districts, and those not of the poorest class only. As people acquired confidence in the security of peace, it ceased to be necessary to protect every country town by fortifications. The walls were thrown down, the stagnant moats were filled up, and as people were no longer limited to a narrow space, they built more convenient houses in airy streets; the dark alleys and damp dwellings under ground were gradually abandoned, and a more comfortable mode of living superseded the former misery. By this means the mortality was considerably diminished, and the power of epidemics was checked; nor can it be doubted, that the better administration of the laws greatly obviated the dissolution of social ties in times of plague, and the effects of superstition and religious animosity, which had formerly been so frightful. These inestimable national improvements, however, took place but gradually, and were not a little retarded for a time by the new evil of the employment of mercenaries. For as the germs of vice were scattered in all directions by the wandering Lansquenets, so also the infection of noxious diseases found easier entrance into the towns and villages through the medium of this dissolute and widely spread class of men. The Lansquenets of the sixteenth century, as spreaders of contagion, supplied the place of the former Romish pilgrims and flagellants; they even proved a more permanent scourge than those wanderers of the middle ages, who only made their appearance on extraordinary occasions. We need here only call to mind the malignant and beyond measure noisome lues which at the end of the fifteenth century spread with the rapidity of lightning over all Europe. It was not an importation from the innocent197 inhabitants of the New World, nor was it bred by the ill-treated Marrani[59], the victims of the Spanish Inquisition. It was the mercenary army of Charles the VIIIth in Naples (1495), whose excesses gave to the already existing poison a malignity till then unknown, and prepared for the deeply rooted depravity, a scourge at which all the world shuddered with horror. It is, moreover, in place here to observe that, in the larger armies which the new military system now brought into the field, the ordinary camp diseases, to which another very fatal one was added[60], were of course much more extensively propagated than in the less numerous forces of preceding centuries, and consequently that the peaceful inhabitants of the towns and of the country at large were thereby exposed to much danger.

It's clear that in this situation, the impact of the plague on society must have been different from earlier times. Harmful factors that, during the Middle Ages, had threatened the health of city dwellers and often turned minor illnesses into serious ones, were permanently eliminated. One major issue was the poorly designed buildings and streets, which still, in large cities, disrupt the comfort of entire neighborhoods, affecting not just the poorest residents. As people became more confident in their safety, it was no longer necessary to fortify every small town. The walls were torn down, the stagnant moats were filled in, and as people were no longer confined to a small area, they built more comfortable homes in open streets. The dark alleys and damp underground dwellings were gradually left behind, replaced by a more pleasant way of living. This led to a significant drop in mortality rates and helped control epidemics. It’s also undeniable that better law enforcement played a major role in maintaining social bonds during times of plague and mitigating the effects of superstition and religious hostility that had once been terrifying. However, these invaluable national improvements took time to develop and were initially slowed down by the new problem of using mercenaries. As the seeds of vice spread by the wandering Lansquenets, so too did the infection of harmful diseases find easier access to towns and villages through this dissolute group. The Lansquenets of the sixteenth century, spreading contagion, took the place of former Roman pilgrims and flagellants; they even turned out to be a more lasting scourge than those medieval wanderers, who only appeared during extraordinary times. We should recall the highly infectious and repulsive diseases that spread like wildfire across Europe at the end of the fifteenth century. It wasn’t brought in by the innocent inhabitants of the New World, nor was it caused by the mistreated Marrani, who were victims of the Spanish Inquisition. It was the mercenary army of Charles VIII in Naples (1495), whose excesses intensified the already existing poison to an unprecedented level, creating a widespread disaster that terrified everyone. Furthermore, it's worth noting that in the larger armies brought into action by the new military system, ordinary camp diseases—along with an even deadlier one—were much more widely spread than in the smaller forces of previous centuries, thus exposing the peaceful residents of towns and the countryside to greater risks.

Sect. 3.—Sweating Sickness.

Meantime Europe was frequently and very severely visited by the epidemics of the middle ages, the terrors of the constantly recurring plague being borne with gloomy resignation to the inevitable evil with which, as a merited chastisement, the anger of God, according to the notion of the times, afflicted the human race. Even the English were not exempt from this fearful visitation, which, in the year 1499, carried off 30,000 people in London alone, so that the king found it advisable to retire with all his court to Calais[61]. Thus the recollection of the Sweating Sickness of 1485 was gradually obliterated. No one thought of its possible return, and all the world was occupied with other matters, when the old enemy unexpectedly again raised his head in the summer of 1506, and scared away this comfortable state of false security. The renewed eruption of the epidemic was not, on this occasion, connected with any important occurrence, so that contemporaries have not even mentioned the month in which it began to rage. Towards the autumn it had again disappeared, and as no new symptoms were added to the disease, the form of which was identified by a reference to the old descriptions, it was immediately treated by the same means, the efficacy of which those who had witnessed 198the epidemic of 1485 lauded with so much reason[62]. Every exposure to heat or cold was, as at that time, avoided, and the malignant fever was left to the curative powers of nature, the patient being kept moderately warm in bed; and no powerful medicines being administered. The result was beyond all expectation favourable, for in few houses did any fatal cases occur. The victory over this dreaded enemy was now, by a pardonable error, attributed more to human skill than to the mildness of the malady on this occasion, which, even under a less judicious treatment of the sick, would certainly not have been marked by any considerable degree of severity.

Meanwhile, Europe was often and severely hit by the epidemics of the Middle Ages, with the fears of the recurring plague being met with a gloomy acceptance of the inevitable suffering that was seen as a deserved punishment for humanity due to God's wrath, according to the beliefs of the time. Even the English were not spared from this terrifying outbreak, which in the year 1499 claimed 30,000 lives in London alone, prompting the king to retreat with his entire court to Calais[61]. Thus, memories of the Sweating Sickness from 1485 gradually faded. No one considered its possible return, and everyone was focused on other issues, when the old foe unexpectedly resurfaced in the summer of 1506, disrupting this false sense of security. The resurgence of the epidemic was not linked to any significant event, so contemporaries didn’t even note the month it began. By autumn, it had vanished again, and since no new symptoms were added to the illness, which was recognized from previous descriptions, it was treated with the same methods as before, praised for their effectiveness by those who had witnessed 198 the epidemic of 1485[62]. People avoided exposure to heat or cold as before, allowing nature to heal the malignant fever, while the patient was kept comfortably warm in bed and no strong medicines were given. The outcome exceeded all expectations, as few households experienced any fatalities. The triumph over this feared enemy was, by a understandable mistake, credited more to human skill than to the mildness of the illness this time, which, even with less careful treatment, would likely not have been very severe.

The disease broke out in London, but whether it penetrated to the west or not, contemporary writers, being soon convinced of its slight character, have left us no intelligence. However widely it may have spread, it certainly was confined to England, and nowhere occasioned any great mortality.

The disease broke out in London, but whether it spread to the west or not, contemporary writers, soon convinced it was mild, have left us with no information. No matter how widely it may have spread, it definitely stayed within England and didn’t cause significant deaths anywhere.

Sect. 4.—Accompanying Phenomena.

As the epidemic was on this occasion so very mild, it was not accompanied by any remarkable phenomena in England, but the case was otherwise in the rest of Europe, as will be proved by the following details. After a wet summer, in the year 1505, a severe winter set in[63]. Comets were seen in this as in the following year. An eruption of Vesuvius also took place in 1506[64], which may be mentioned, although it is well established that volcanic commotions are to be taken into account only in great pestilences, not in less extensive epidemics. In England there blew a violent storm from the south-west, from the 15th till the 26th of January, 1506, which drove the king of Castille, Philip of Austria, with his consort Johanna, from the Netherlands to Weymouth; and as, some days before, a golden eagle falling from St. Paul’s church, in London, had crushed a black eagle which ornamented some lower building, evil predictions were promulgated among the people respecting the fate of this son of the emperor[65]. This event, however, could not be considered as at all connected with the pestilence which broke out about 199half a year afterwards. More consideration is due to the gloom and anxiety which at that time depressed the spirit of the English nation. The reckless avarice of Henry the VIIth, named the English Solomon[66], gave just ground for doubts regarding the security of property; and the pious foundations—those accustomed means of softening the dreaded wrath of heaven, which the king, who became gradually more and more broken down by disease, established, could not efface the recollection of the arbitrary violence and extortions of his corrupt servants[67]. Although these extortions principally affected the wealthy nobility, who were much in need of restraint, yet dark mistrust was general, and all cheerfulness was banished from the minds of the people. This state of feeling might have been favourable to the propagation of the returning disease, but the genius of the year 1506 would not suffer it to be more than a slight and transient reminiscence of a mystically hidden danger, the import of which was not apparent to any medical inquirer of the 16th century.

As the epidemic was quite mild this time, it didn't bring about any significant events in England, but the situation was different elsewhere in Europe, as the following details will show. After a wet summer in 1505, a harsh winter began[63]. Comets were seen that year and the next. An eruption of Vesuvius occurred in 1506[64], which is worth mentioning, although it's well established that volcanic eruptions are only linked to major plagues, not minor outbreaks. In England, a fierce storm came from the southwest, lasting from January 15th to 26th, 1506, which forced Philip of Austria, the king of Castile, and his wife Johanna to flee from the Netherlands to Weymouth. Just days earlier, a golden eagle had fallen from St. Paul's Church in London and crushed a black eagle that decorated a lower building, leading to ominous predictions among the people about the future of this son of the emperor[65]. However, this incident couldn't be connected to the outbreak of disease that occurred about half a year later, around 199. More attention should be given to the gloom and anxiety that weighed on the English nation at that time. The reckless greed of Henry VII, known as the English Solomon[66], raised serious doubts about property security; and the religious institutions—those traditional means of appeasing the feared wrath of heaven, which the increasingly ill king established—couldn't erase the memories of the arbitrary violence and extortion carried out by his corrupt officials[67]. Although these abuses mainly affected the wealthy nobility, who desperately needed restraint, a pervasive sense of mistrust prevailed, and joy was driven from the minds of the people. This feeling could have contributed to the spread of the returning disease, but the circumstances of 1506 meant it remained just a minor and brief reminder of a danger that was mystically concealed, the significance of which was not recognized by any medical expert of the 16th century.

Sect. 5.—Petechial Fever in Italy, 1505.

Thus, if we paid attention, as usual, only to the palpable occurrences which take place on the earth and beneath its surface, the Sweating Sickness of the above-mentioned year might appear to be unconnected with more considerable commotions of organic life. The powers of nature, however, are in their operations too subtle to be comprehended by our dull senses and by the coarse mechanism of our organs; nay, precisely at a time when neither the one nor the other indicate any alteration around us, those operations bring to light the most extraordinary phenomena in the human frame—that most sensitive index of secret influences on life. This observation was fully confirmed at the time of the first return of the sweating fever. For whilst this disease remained confined to England, there appeared in the southern and central parts of Europe a new and fatal epidemic, which thenceforth visited these nations almost continually with intense malignity. This was the petechial fever, a disease unknown to the older physicians, which was 200first observed in 1490, in Granada, where it threatened to annihilate the army of Ferdinand the Catholic, and made great havoc also among the Saracens[68]. The bubo plague had immediately preceded it, (1483, 1485, 1486, 1488, 1489, and 1490[69],) and it may with no small probability be assumed that the petechial fever had resulted from this as a peculiar variety, since in other countries also, fifteen years later, the bubo plague degenerated in various ways, and examples are not wanting in which particular forms or constituent parts of great epidemics thus branch off from them, in the same manner as, under favourable circumstances, these will combine together, and united into one destructive whole, multiply the sources of danger.

So, if we only focus on the visible events happening on earth and beneath its surface, the Sweating Sickness from the year we mentioned might seem unrelated to larger disturbances in living organisms. However, the forces of nature are too subtle in their workings for our dull senses and the basic functions of our organs to fully grasp; indeed, at times when neither our senses nor our organs show any signs of change around us, these forces reveal the most astonishing phenomena in the human body—our most sensitive indicator of hidden influences on life. This was clearly confirmed during the first resurgence of the sweating fever. While this disease remained contained within England, a new and deadly epidemic emerged in southern and central Europe, which then frequently afflicted these nations with intense severity. This was the petechial fever, a disease unknown to older physicians, first noted in 1490 in Granada, where it threatened to wipe out Ferdinand the Catholic's army and caused significant damage among the Saracens. The bubo plague had directly preceded it (1483, 1485, 1486, 1488, 1489, and 1490), and it’s quite likely that the petechial fever developed as a specific variation of this since, in other countries, fifteen years later, the bubo plague evolved in various ways, and there are many instances where specific forms or components of large epidemics branch off in the same way that, under favorable conditions, they can combine and form a unified destructive force, increasing the sources of danger.

Yet some contemporaries were of opinion that the petechial fever had been brought over to Granada[70] by Venetian mercenaries from Cyprus, where they had fought against the Turks, and where this disorder was said to have been indigenous. Notwithstanding some good works[71] already existing, this matter has need of a more thorough examination, which might bring to light important and instructive results, respecting the rise and spread of the petechial fever, and especially respecting its relation to other plagues. Whatever may be held with regard to the true origin of this fever, thus much is established, that it was at first an independent European disease, and that, at the commencement, having occupied the southern part of this quarter of the world, it then became connected, in a manner as extraordinary as it was worthy of observation, with the sweating sickness of the north; since the nearly simultaneous eruption of the sweating fever in England, with the great epidemic petechial fever in the year 1505, may be justly attributed to an influence common to both, although unquestionably of greater power in the latter.

Yet some people at the time believed that the petechial fever was brought to Granada by Venetian mercenaries from Cyprus, where they had fought against the Turks, and where this illness was said to be native. Despite some valuable research already being available, this topic needs a deeper examination, which could reveal important and insightful findings about the origins and spread of the petechial fever, and especially its connection to other epidemics. Regardless of the true source of this fever, it is clear that it initially emerged as an independent disease in Europe, and at the beginning, after spreading through the southern part of this region, it became linked, in a way that was both remarkable and worthy of notice, to the sweating sickness in the north; the almost simultaneous outbreak of the sweating fever in England and the major epidemic of petechial fever in 1505 can rightly be attributed to a common influence on both, though it undoubtedly had a stronger impact in the latter.

The epidemic petechial fever, of which we are now treating, prevailed principally in Italy, and is described by Fracastoro 201as the first plague of this kind which ever appeared in that country. Of this new disease[72], which was placed by this great physician midway between the bubo plague and the non-pestilential fever, the contagious quality showed itself from the beginning; yet it was plainly perceived, that the contagion did not take effect so quickly as in the bubo plague, that it was not conveyed so easily by means of clothing and other articles, and that physicians and attendants on the sick were the only persons who incurred much danger of infection. The fever began insidiously, and with very slight symptoms, so that the sick in general did not so much as seek medical aid. Many persons, and even physicians among the number, suffered themselves to be deceived by this circumstance, and thus, not being aware of the danger, they hoped to effect an easy cure, and were not a little astonished at the sudden development of malignant phenomena. The heat was inconsiderable, in proportion to the fever, yet those affected felt a certain inward indisposition, a general depression of all the vital powers, and a weariness as if after great exertion. They lay upon their backs with an oppressed brain, their senses were blunted, and in most cases delirium and gloomy muttering, with bloodshot eyes, commenced from the fourth to the seventh day. The urine was usually clear and copious at the beginning, it then became red and turbid, or resembling pomegranate wine, (granatwein,) the pulse was slow and small, the evacuations putrid and offensive, and either on the fourth or seventh day red or purple spots, like flea-bites, or larger, or resembling lentils, (lenticulæ,) which also gave a name to the disorder, broke out on the arms, the back, and the breast. There was either no thirst at all, or very little; the tongue was loaded, and in many cases a lethargic state came on. Others, on the contrary, suffered from sleeplessness, or from both these symptoms alternately. The disease reached its height on the seventh or on the fourteenth day, and in some cases still later. In many there existed a retention of urine with very unfavourable prognosis. Women seldom died of this fever, elderly people still more rarely, and Jews scarcely ever. Young people, on the other hand, and children died in great numbers, and especially from among the higher ranks, while the plague, on the contrary, used generally to commit its ravages only 202among the poorer classes. An inordinate loss of power in the commencement betokened death, as also a too violent effect from mild aperient means, and a failure in alleviation after a complete crisis. Patients were seen to die who had lost to the extent of three pounds of blood from the nose. It was also a very bad sign when the spots disappeared, or broke out tardily, or were of a blackish-blue colour. Phenomena of an opposite character, on the contrary, afforded hope of recovery.

The epidemic petechial fever we are currently treating primarily spread in Italy and is described by Fracastoro 201 as the first plague of this kind to appear in that country. This new disease[72], which this renowned physician placed between the bubo plague and the non-pestilential fever, showed its contagious nature right from the start. However, it was clear that the contagion didn't take effect as quickly as in the bubo plague, that it wasn't transmitted as easily through clothing and other items, and that only physicians and caregivers faced a significant risk of infection. The fever started subtly with very mild symptoms, so most sick people didn't even seek medical help. Many individuals, including some physicians, were misled by this, thinking they could achieve an easy cure, and were surprised by the sudden onset of severe symptoms. The fever's heat was mild compared to the severity of the illness, yet those affected experienced some internal discomfort, general fatigue, and an exhaustion as if after intense effort. They lay flat on their backs with a heavy head, their senses dulled, and in most cases, delirium and murky mutterings, along with bloodshot eyes, began by the fourth to seventh day. Initially, the urine was usually clear and abundant, but then it turned red and cloudy, resembling pomegranate wine (granatwein); the pulse was slow and weak, the bowel movements were foul-smelling, and either on the fourth or seventh day, red or purple spots, like flea bites or larger, resembling lentils (lenticulæ), which also gave the disease its name, appeared on the arms, back, and chest. There was either no thirst or very little; the tongue was coated, and in many cases, a lethargic state set in. Others, conversely, experienced sleeplessness or alternated between these symptoms. The disease peaked on the seventh or fourteenth day, and in some cases even later. In many cases, there was urine retention with a very unfavorable prognosis. Women rarely died from this fever, elderly people even less frequently, and Jews almost never. In contrast, young people and children, especially from the higher classes, died in large numbers, while the plague typically affected the poorer classes. An excessive loss of strength at the beginning indicated death, as did a severe reaction to mild laxatives and a failure to improve after a full crisis. Patients were seen to die after losing up to three pounds of blood from their noses. It was also a bad sign if the spots disappeared, broke out slowly, or appeared a blackish-blue color. Conversely, symptoms of the opposite kind offered hope for recovery.

The best physicians were agreed on the importance of the petechiæ as an indication of the nature of the crisis; for those cases in which they were abundant and of a good quality were cured much more easily than those in which the eruption was suppressed. An abundant perspiration also was particularly conducive to recovery, whereas all other evacuations, especially a flux from the bowels, proved to be injurious and even fatal.

The best doctors agreed on the importance of petechiae as a sign of the crisis's nature; cases where they were plentiful and of good quality were much easier to cure than those where the rash was suppressed. Heavy sweating also greatly contributed to recovery, while other types of evacuations, especially diarrhea, were harmful and could even be deadly.

If we keep these phenomena in view, and consider, moreover, that in the widely extending lues venerea of those times cutaneous eruptions predominated over the other symptoms, the English sweating sickness in the north of Europe will appear, as in connexion with this circumstance, of a very important character; and the supposition, that the morbid activity of the system during the whole of this age, maintained a decided determination to the skin, may thence be fairly considered as something more than a mere conjecture.

If we keep these phenomena in mind, and also consider that during that time, skin eruptions were the most common symptoms of the widespread venereal diseases, the English sweating sickness in northern Europe will seem, in relation to this fact, quite significant; and the idea that the body's disease activity during this entire period was strongly directed towards the skin can reasonably be seen as more than just a guess.

This fact speaks for itself, but the causes of this altered temperament of the body it is not an easy matter to discover. Fracastoro, who knew much better than his modern followers how to manage his sagacious doctrine of contagion, looked for these causes in the quality of the air, which was manifest by much more evident phenomena in the epidemic petechial fever of 1528 than in that of 1505, and he traced an active connexion between this quality, which he called “infection of the atmosphere,”[73] and the condition of the blood; thus indicating unknown influences by an obscure notion. He considered the altered quality of the blood according to the established views of that period, which the petechial spotted fever seemed clearly to confirm, 203as a putrefaction; and he even assumed that, in the non-epidemic petechial fevers, which, from the year 1505 forward, frequently occurred, isolated causes must have given rise to changes in the blood, as well as that quality of the air, to which this great physician attributed the general and continued alterations which take place in the nature of diseases.

This fact is clear on its own, but figuring out the reasons behind this change in the body's temperament is not straightforward. Fracastoro, who understood his insightful theory of contagion far better than many today, sought these reasons in the quality of the air, which was evident through clearer phenomena in the epidemic petechial fever of 1528 compared to that of 1505. He identified a connection between this quality, which he referred to as “infection of the atmosphere,”[73] and the condition of the blood, suggesting unknown influences through a vague concept. He viewed the altered quality of the blood in line with the accepted beliefs of his time, which the petechial spotted fever seemed to clearly support, 203as a form of putrefaction. He even suggested that in the non-epidemic petechial fevers, which had been occurring regularly since 1505, specific causes must have led to changes in the blood, along with the air quality that this prominent physician believed was responsible for the ongoing changes in the nature of diseases.

The petechial fever made the same impression on the physicians of Italy as new disorders have ever made; for although they were the best in Europe, their view was bounded by the horizon of Galen, within the limits of which the novel phenomenon was not to be found. They were therefore soon perplexed, and whilst they sought to entrammel the dreaded enemy with scholastic doctrines of repletion and acrimony and occult qualities, and betook themselves first to one remedy and then to another, they exposed themselves to the derision of the people, who soon perceived their disagreement and indecision, and, as usual, charged on the whole medical profession the well merited blame of individuals[74].

The petechial fever made the same impression on the doctors of Italy as new diseases always have; even though they were the best in Europe, their understanding was limited by the teachings of Galen, within which this new phenomenon couldn't be classified. They quickly became confused, and while they tried to trap the feared enemy with complex theories about excess and irritation and hidden qualities, they bounced from one treatment to another. This left them open to mockery from the public, who quickly noticed their disagreements and indecision, and as usual, they blamed the entire medical profession for the failings of a few individuals__.A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.

Sect. 6.—Other Diseases.

About the same period, in October, 1505, a very fatal disease broke out in Lisbon, the further progress of which was marked by the terror, the flight, and the confusion of the inhabitants[75]. Of what kind it was, whether a petechial fever or a bubo plague, and what connexion it had with a pestilence in Spain which had just preceded it, it would perhaps be difficult now to ascertain. This latter pestilence had spread from Seville, following an earthquake, and violent storms of wind and rain in 1504, and may very likely have been a bubo plague. Similar notices are met with of pestilences occurring in that country in 1506, the year of the English Sweating Sickness, in 1507 and 1508, in which years mention is made of swarms of locusts in the neighbourhood of Seville, and finally in 1510, the year of a great influenza[76], and 1515. Exact descriptions, however, of these disorders are entirely wanting[77].

About the same time, in October 1505, a deadly disease broke out in Lisbon, which was marked by fear, panic, and confusion among the residents[75]. It's hard to determine what kind it was—whether it was a petechial fever or bubonic plague—and how it was related to a recent outbreak in Spain. This latter outbreak had spread from Seville after an earthquake and severe storms in 1504, and it was likely bubonic plague. Similar reports of epidemics in that country occurred in 1506, during the year of the English Sweating Sickness, as well as in 1507 and 1508, when locust swarms were reported near Seville, and again in 1510, the year of a major influenza[76], and in 1515. However, precise descriptions of these illnesses are completely lacking[77].

204

204

With all the above phenomena, the epidemics which took place in Germany and France at the commencement of the sixteenth century, evidently unite to form a connected whole. Varying in intensity and extent, they continued without intermission for full five years, and moreover were accompanied by unusual circumstances, such as occur only in the time of great pestilences. The century was ushered in by the appearance of a comet[78], which, on this occasion, seemed to confirm the long cherished belief that the appearance of these heavenly bodies was prognostic of evil. For mankind are in the habit of concluding that phenomena which are simultaneous must have some internal connexion, and many examples were called to mind in which great pestilences affecting the whole world had been either preceded or accompanied by comets[79]. Immediately afterwards a great murrain among cattle took place, which may have proceeded from some injurious quality in their food. A notion immediately arose that the pastures were poisoned, and of this there was so firm a conviction, that the most violent resentment, as of old, in the time of the Black Death, prevailed against the supposed poisoners, and in the neighbourhood of Meissen some “böse Buben” (wicked knaves) who had fallen under suspicion, were actually executed[80].

With all the above phenomena, the epidemics that occurred in Germany and France at the start of the sixteenth century clearly come together to form a connected whole. Varying in intensity and scope, they lasted continuously for a full five years, and were also accompanied by unusual circumstances that typically happen only during major pandemics. The century began with the appearance of a comet[78], which seemed to reinforce the long-held belief that the appearance of these celestial bodies signaled impending doom. People often assume that simultaneous events must be related, and many examples were recalled where major pandemics affecting the entire world were either preceded or accompanied by comets[79]. Soon after, there was a significant outbreak of disease among cattle, possibly caused by something harmful in their food. A belief quickly emerged that the pastures had been poisoned, and there was such a strong conviction of this that the same violent resentment, reminiscent of the Black Death, arose against the alleged poisoners, leading to the execution of some “böse Buben” (wicked knaves) in the vicinity of Meissen who had come under suspicion[80].

A very considerable blight of caterpillars which, in the north of Germany, stripped the gardens and woods far and wide of their foliage, deserves to be here mentioned as a phenomenon appertaining to the lower grades of the animal kingdom[81]. Natural history has shewn that occurrences of this kind are by no means occasioned by new and wonderful influences, but rather by unusual combinations of circumstances, appearing to occur together almost accidentally, at a given time; especially by the simultaneous union of warmth and humidity in the atmosphere, whereby sometimes one and sometimes another of the lower grades of animal existences becomes extraordinarily developed. It is on this account that unusual phenomena in the insect world, whether it be the appearance or the disappearance of particular kinds, take place much more frequently when the order of succession 205in the seasons and the condition of the atmosphere are in a greater degree than usual and more permanently disturbed; and thus those phenomena have, with much reason, ever been considered as forerunners of pestilences, whenever the human frame has become, through atmospherical causes, generally susceptible of disease. Swarms of locusts have appeared before and during most great pestilences, and indeed the exuberant production of this insect appears, at least in Europe, to require the most unusual combination of causes.

A significant outbreak of caterpillars that, in northern Germany, stripped gardens and woods of their leaves, merits mention as a phenomenon related to the lower levels of the animal kingdom[81]. Natural history has shown that such occurrences are not caused by new and extraordinary influences, but rather by unusual combinations of circumstances that seem to happen together almost by chance at a specific time; particularly by the simultaneous presence of warmth and humidity in the atmosphere, which sometimes allows one type or another of lower-level animal life to develop extraordinarily. For this reason, unusual phenomena in the insect world, whether it’s the emergence or disappearance of certain species, occur much more frequently when the seasonal order and atmospheric conditions are more disturbed than usual and remain so for extended periods; thus, these phenomena have often been viewed as harbingers of diseases whenever people become, due to atmospheric factors, generally more vulnerable to illness. Swarms of locusts have emerged before and during most major epidemics, and indeed, the excessive reproduction of this insect seems, at least in Europe, to depend on the most unusual combination of factors.

Sect. 7.—Blood Spots.

Of rarer occurrence, but quite as important in reference to the general tendencies of life, are the luxuriant growths of the minutest cryptogamic plants in the water, and on damp things of all kinds, which, from their spots of various forms and colours, produced the utmost horror both before and during great pestilences, and excited superstitious fears, as appearing to be something miraculous. These spots (signacula), and especially the blood-spots, were seen at a very early period, as for instance during the great general plague in the sixth century[82], and again, during the plague of the years 786[83] and 959, when it is said to have been remarked, that those on whose clothes they frequently appeared, and seemingly imparted to them a peculiar odour, were more susceptible than other people of attack from leprosy, on which account this spotted appearance was inconsiderately called the clothes leprosy[84], (Lepra vestium;) not to mention other examples[85] in which plagues affecting the human species did not take place. The same signs also, in the years from 1500 to 1503, threw the faithful into great consternation, because, as on former occasions, they fancied they recognised in them the form of the cross[86]. The phenomenon on this occasion 206spread throughout Germany and France, and from its great extent and long duration, may be reckoned among the most remarkable of the kind. The spots were of different colours, principally red, but also white, yellow, grey, and black, and arose, often in a very short time on the roofs of houses, on clothes, on the veils and neck handkerchiefs of women, on various household utensils, on the meat in larders, &c. A historian, who speaks also of blood-rain[87], recounts that they could not be got rid of in less than ten or twelve days, and that they frequently occurred in closed chests, on linen and on articles of clothing[88]. Much information is not to be expected from the researches of the naturalists of those times, but there is no doubt that what is described was some one or more kinds of mould[89], inasmuch as the whole phenomenon evidently corresponds with modern observations[90]. Scientific physicians of the sixteenth century, among whom the naturalist George Agricola, who was born in 1494, and died in 1555, ought especially to be mentioned, recognised, even then, these spots as lichens, and without seeking to account for them by supernatural agencies, or lending credence to popular superstition, they gave them their just interpretation as indications of extensive disease[91]. Should the too bold notion of Nees v. Esenbeck, that fungi of the most minute forms have their origin in the higher regions of the firmament, and descending to the surface of the earth, produce spots and stains, be confirmed, which is not yet the case, these “signacula” would have a much more important connexion with epidemics than can be otherwise conceded to them; for though it be highly probable that they have their origin only in the dissemination of 207germs in the lower strata of the atmosphere, it must yet be granted, that if they appear over a considerable space, and during a long time, as at the commencement of the sixteenth century, the causes favouring their generation and spread, must be ranked among those of an extraordinary kind, and on this very account may exercise an influence over human organism, as was then evident.

Of rarer occurrence, but just as important in relation to the general trends of life, are the lush growths of the tiniest cryptogamic plants in the water and on damp surfaces of all kinds, which, due to their various shapes and colors, caused immense fear both before and during major plagues, and sparked superstitious anxieties, as they appeared to be something miraculous. These spots (signacula), especially the blood-spots, were noted quite early on, such as during the major plague in the sixth century [82], and again during the plagues of 786 [83] and 959, when it was observed that people whose clothes were often marked by them, which seemed to give off a peculiar odor, were more likely than others to be affected by leprosy. This spotted appearance was carelessly labeled as the clothes leprosy [84], (Lepra vestium); not to mention other instances [85] when plagues affecting humans did not occur. The same signs also caused considerable alarm among the faithful from 1500 to 1503, as they, like before, believed they saw the shape of the cross [86]. This phenomenon at this time 206spread across Germany and France, and due to its vast reach and lengthy duration, can be regarded as one of the most notable of its kind. The spots appeared in different colors, mainly red, but also white, yellow, gray, and black, emerging often in a very short amount of time on rooftops, clothing, women’s veils and neck handkerchiefs, various household items, on meat in larders, etc. A historian, discussing blood-rain [87], notes that they could not be removed in less than ten or twelve days, and that they often appeared in closed chests, on linens, and on clothing [88]. We can't expect much insight from the studies of naturalists of that time, but it’s clear that what was described involved some kind of mold [89], as the whole phenomenon clearly aligns with modern observations [90]. Scientific physicians of the sixteenth century, particularly the naturalist George Agricola, who was born in 1494 and died in 1555, recognized even then that these spots were lichens, and without trying to explain them through supernatural means or buying into popular superstition, they rightly interpreted them as signs of widespread disease [91]. If the daring theory of Nees v. Esenbeck—that fungi of the tiniest forms originate in higher atmospheric regions, descending to the earth’s surface and causing spots and stains—were confirmed, which it hasn't been yet, these “signacula” would have a much more significant connection to epidemics than currently acknowledged; for while it’s highly probable that they arise solely from germ dissemination in the lower levels of the atmosphere, it must be recognized that if they appear over a large area and for an extended period, as was the case at the start of the sixteenth century, the conditions that favor their formation and spread must be considered extraordinary, potentially impacting the human body, as was evident at that time.

For so early as the fruitful year 1503, the plague, which had already appeared partially, made great advances, and France in particular was visited by so fatal a pestilence, that the inhabitants of towns and villages, in order to escape the infection, fled in bodies to the woods, and even the house-dogs became wild, which never happens, unless a country be extensively depopulated[92]. They were obliged to establish great hunts, in order to free the country from these new beasts of prey, and from wolves which appeared in great multitudes[93]. The dry and continued heat of the following year, 1504, having given rise to still more extensive sickness, and caused a failure in the crops, the bubo plague raged in Germany with such violence, that in some places a third part, and in others as many as half the inhabitants perished. Various kinds of fevers accompanied this overwhelming disease, among which there was one distinguished by headache and phrensy similar to that which appeared in France, in 1482[94]. Various putrid fevers and putrid inflammations of the lungs with bloody expectoration, are also no less plainly discernible from the accounts[95]. This diversified and general sickness throughout the whole of Germany, terminated 208in the cold winter of 1504–5 and the following summer, during which there was a continued murrain among cattle. It is certain, that at that time the petechial fever in Italy, had not yet passed the Alps.

As early as the fruitful year 1503, the plague, which had already partially appeared, spread significantly, with France in particular experiencing such a deadly outbreak that people in towns and villages fled to the woods to avoid the infection. Even the house dogs became wild, which typically only happens when a region becomes severely depopulated[92]. They had to organize large hunts to rid the country of these new predators and the wolves that appeared in large numbers[93]. The dry and prolonged heat of the following year, 1504, led to even more widespread illness and crop failures. The bubo plague raged in Germany with such intensity that in some areas a third of the population, and in others as much as half, perished. Various types of fevers accompanied this devastating disease, including one characterized by headaches and insanity similar to what appeared in France in 1482[94]. Different putrid fevers and lung inflammations with bloody coughs were also clearly noted in the reports[95]. This diverse and widespread illness throughout Germany came to an end during the cold winter of 1504–5 and the following summer, during which there was an ongoing disease among cattle. It is certain that at that time, the petechial fever in Italy had not yet crossed the Alps.

From all these facts it is a probable conjecture, that the Sweating Sickness which visited England in the year 1506, although accompanied in that country itself by no prominent circumstances, was not without connexion with the morbid commotion of human and animal life in the south and middle of Europe, and may perhaps be regarded as having been the last feeble effort of mysterious agencies in the domain of organized being.

Based on all these facts, it's likely that the Sweating Sickness that hit England in 1506, even though it didn’t have any major events associated with it in that country, was still connected to the disease outbreaks affecting both humans and animals in southern and central Europe. It could possibly be seen as the last weak attempt of unknown forces in the realm of living organisms.


CHAPTER III.
THE THIRD OUTBREAK OF THE DISEASE.—1517.


“This learned Lord, this Lord of wit and art,
This metaphysick Lord, holds forth a Glasse,
Through which we may behold in every part
This boisterous prince.”—Howell[96].

Sect. 1.—Poverty.

The ordinances of Henry the VIIth, which, although adapted to the times, bore hard upon the people, soon produced their fruits. The great diminished the number of their servants, and as, moreover, many of the peasantry were thrown out of employment in consequence of a conversion of large tracts of arable land into pasture[97], the population of towns increased even to an overflow, and the consequent activity of trade gradually rendered the towns flourishing. But this change took place too rapidly. Wealth and luxury engendered, it is true, numerous wants which were a source of gain, so that the English were at this time considered luxurious and effeminate[98], but there was a general 209scarcity of workmen and artists, and hence it happened, that from Genoa, Lombardy, France, Germany and Holland, innumerable foreigners immigrated and took possession of the most lucrative branches of employment. This was a peculiar hardship on the natives, who from their imperfect knowledge of the arts, could not compete with the more skilful foreigners, and were besides treated by them with insolence and contempt. The distresses of the poor thus increased yearly, and their indignation at length broke out. A great insurrection of the English artisans arose throughout London, and might have proved destructive to the foreigners, had affairs been in a less orderly state. The popular commotion was, however, suppressed without any considerable sacrifice, and Henry the VIIIth on a solemn day, appointed at Westminster, for passing judgment upon the prisoners, bestowed a pardon on them; for he saw into the causes of their discontent, and very soon after caused restrictive alien laws to be enacted[99].

The rules of Henry the VIIth, which were adapted to the times but were hard on the people, quickly led to consequences. The wealthy reduced the number of their servants, and since many of the peasants lost their jobs due to large areas of farmland being turned into pasture[97], the population of towns surged, causing a booming trade that made the towns thrive. However, this change happened too quickly. The wealth and luxury created many new desires that became profitable, making the English seem luxurious and soft[98], but there was a widespread shortage of workers and craftsmen. As a result, countless foreigners from Genoa, Lombardy, France, Germany, and Holland immigrated and took over the most profitable jobs. This was a significant hardship for the locals, who struggled to compete with the more skilled foreigners due to their lack of knowledge in the arts and were treated with arrogance and disdain. The suffering of the poor grew each year, and their anger eventually erupted. A massive uprising of English artisans broke out across London, which could have been disastrous for the foreigners if things had been less organized. However, the unrest was quelled without major loss, and on a formal day set at Westminster to pass judgment on the prisoners, Henry the VIIIth granted them a pardon. He understood the reasons for their discontent and soon after pushed for laws to limit immigration[99].

Sect. 2.—Sweating Sickness.

All this took place in April and May of the ever memorable year 1517, and London was again indulging in hopes of better days, when the Sweating Sickness once more broke out quite unexpectedly in July, and in spite of all former experience, and the most sedulous attention, inexorably demanded its victims. On this occasion it was so violent and so rapid in its course, that it carried off those who were attacked in two or three hours, so that the first shivering fit was regarded as the announcement of certain death. It was not ushered in by any precursory symptoms. Many who were in good health at noon, were numbered among the dead by the evening, and thus as great a dread was created at this new peril as ever was felt during the prevalence of the most suddenly destructive epidemic: for the thought of being snatched away from the full enjoyment of existence without any preparation, without any hope of recovery, is appalling even to the bravest, and excites secret trepidation and anguish. Among the lower classes the deaths were innumerable[100]. The city was moreover crowded with poor; but even the ranks of the higher classes were thinned, and no precaution averted 210death from their palaces. Ammonius of Lucca, a scholar of some celebrity, and in this capacity private secretary to the king, was cut off in the flower of his age, after having boasted to Sir Thomas More, only a few hours before his death, that by moderation and good management he had secured both himself and his family from the disease[101]. Also of those immediately about the king, Lords Grey and Clinton were carried off, besides many knights, officers and courtiers. Mourning supplanted the hilarity and brilliancy of the festivals, and the king, while in miserable solitude, into which he had retired with a few followers, received message after message from different towns and villages, announcing, that in some a third, in others even half the inhabitants were swept off by this pestilence. It had never before raged with so much fatality. The minds of men had never before been so frightfully appalled. The festival of Michaelmas, (29th September,) which in England was always kept with much religious pomp, was of necessity postponed; nor was the solemnity of Christmas observed, for there was a dread of collecting together large assemblies of people[102], on account of the contagion; and just about this time, when the Sweating Sickness had abated, the plague, according to the account of some historians, began, which, although probably not very virulent, prevailed during the whole winter in most English towns, and continued to keep up the distress of the people. The king on this occasion also quitted his capital, and retreated, in company with a few attendants, before the contagion, frequently shifting his court from place to place. It was during this period of trouble (11th of February, 1518) that the Princess Mary, afterwards Queen, was born[103].

All this happened in April and May of the unforgettable year 1517, and London was once again hopeful for better days when the Sweating Sickness unexpectedly broke out again in July. Despite all past experiences and careful precautions, it brutally claimed its victims. This time, it was so severe and quick that those who fell ill were gone within two or three hours, with the first shivering fit seen as a sure sign of imminent death. It didn't come with any warning symptoms. Many who were perfectly healthy at noon were counted among the dead by evening, creating as much fear about this new danger as had ever been felt during the most rapidly deadly epidemics. The idea of being taken away from life’s full enjoyment without warning or hope of recovery is terrifying even for the strongest and stirs hidden fear and anguish. Among the lower classes, the deaths were countless[100]. The city was also overflowing with the poor; yet even the upper classes faced losses, and no precautions spared them from death within their palaces. Ammonius of Lucca, a well-known scholar and private secretary to the king, was taken in the prime of life, having just boasted to Sir Thomas More only hours before his death that he had kept himself and his family safe from the disease[101]. Lords Grey and Clinton, along with many knights, officers, and courtiers, also succumbed. Grief replaced the joy and brilliance of the celebrations, and the king, in his sorrowful solitude with a few followers, received message after message from different towns and villages, reporting that in some, a third, and in others even half the population had been taken by this plague. It had never before been so deadly. People's minds had never been as horrifyingly terrified. The celebration of Michaelmas (29th September), traditionally observed in England with much religious ceremony, had to be postponed; and Christmas was not celebrated due to fear of gathering large crowds[102], because of the contagion. Just around this time, as the Sweating Sickness started to subside, the plague began, according to some historians. Although it likely wasn't very contagious, it persisted throughout the winter in most English towns, continuing to cause distress among the population. The king also left his capital during this crisis, retreating with a few attendants to escape the contagion, frequently moving his court from place to place. It was during this time of trouble (11th of February, 1518) that Princess Mary, who would later become queen, was born[103].

211

211

Thus the Sweating Sickness lasted full six months, reached its greatest height[104] about six weeks after its appearance, and probably spread from London over the whole of England. In Oxford and Cambridge it raged with no less violence than in the capital. Most of the inhabitants of those places were, in the course of a few days, confined to their beds, and the sciences, which then flourished, for they were never more zealously cultivated in England than at that time, suffered severe losses by the death of many able and distinguished scholars[105]. Scotland, Ireland and all other countries beyond sea, were on this occasion spared. The neighbouring town of Calais alone was reached[106] by the pestilence; and according to later observations, it may be considered as certain, that only the English who resided there, and not the French inhabitants, were affected, as it is also ascertained that the rest of France continued throughout free from the disease. Had this not been the case, contemporary writers would undoubtedly not have omitted to make mention of so important an occurrence.

The Sweating Sickness lasted a full six months, reached its peak about six weeks after it first appeared, and likely spread from London throughout England. In Oxford and Cambridge, it was just as intense as in the capital. Most of the people in those areas were confined to their beds within a few days, and the sciences, which were flourishing at that time—never more passionately pursued in England—suffered serious losses with the deaths of many talented and prominent scholars. Scotland, Ireland, and all other countries beyond the sea were spared during this outbreak. Only the nearby town of Calais was affected by the disease; later observations confirm that it was primarily the English residents there, not the French locals, who were struck down, and it is also confirmed that the rest of France remained free from the illness. Had this not been the case, contemporary writers would surely have noted such a significant event.

Sect. 3.—Causes.

The influences which gave rise to this third eruption of the disorder among the English nation are obscure, and do not altogether correspond with those of the years 1485 and 1506. Thus it is especially remarkable, that, on this occasion, there is no express mention of the humidity which had so decided a share in the origin of the two former visitations of the Sweating Sickness, and the year 1517 was in most respects one of an ordinary kind. The English Chronicles state nothing remarkable on the subject, and from those of Germany we only learn that the winter of 1516 was very mild, and that a fruitful summer with an abundant vintage[107] and a cold winter followed. The summer of 1517 was unfruitful, although not on account of wet 212weather, so that in some parts, especially in Swabia, provision was made against a scarcity[108]. A great comet appeared in 1516[109], and in 1517 an earthquake was felt at Tübingen, Nördlingen, and Calw, during a violent storm, whereupon the “Haupt Krankheit”[110] (encephalitis), accompanied by fever, became more prevalent, although not remarkably fatal[111]. This phenomenon (the earthquake) was by no means unimportant[112] in its effects, and there is reason to suppose that it was followed by subterraneous commotions of still greater extent, for earthquakes occurred also in Spain[113]. As the date of this event is specified as the 16th of June, and as earthquakes occurring in unusual localities, that is to say, in districts not volcanic, are frequently cited as prognostics of great diseases, although in volcanic districts they evidently betoken nothing of the kind, we may hence with some reason assume a telluric influence, which perhaps reached the locality of the pestilence that broke out at the beginning of July, if not earlier. Besides, we cannot find any greater phenomenon, which, according to human conception, could have had a more immediate connexion with the English Sweating Sickness; and in this instance too, inquiry the most circumspect does not penetrate through the thick veil which envelopes the inscrutable causes of epidemics.

The reasons behind this third outbreak of the illness among the English people are unclear and don’t fully match those from 1485 and 1506. It’s especially notable that, this time, there’s no mention of the humidity that played a significant role in the earlier waves of Sweating Sickness, and the year 1517 was mostly typical. The English Chronicles don’t highlight anything unusual regarding this matter, and from German accounts, we only learn that the winter of 1516 was quite mild, leading to a bountiful summer with a plentiful harvest and a cold winter that followed. The summer of 1517 was poor in crops, but not due to wet weather, prompting some areas, especially in Swabia, to prepare for a shortage. A significant comet appeared in 1516, and in 1517, an earthquake shook Tübingen, Nördlingen, and Calw during a severe storm, after which the "Haupt Krankheit" (encephalitis), along with fever, became more common, though it was not particularly deadly. This earthquake was certainly not insignificant in its effects, and it’s reasonable to think it was followed by even greater underground disturbances, as earthquakes were also reported in Spain. Since this event took place on June 16, and considering that earthquakes in unusual areas—meaning non-volcanic regions—are often cited as signs of serious diseases (while in volcanic areas they generally don’t indicate anything of the sort), we can reasonably assume a geological influence that may have even reached the area where the outbreak began in early July, if not sooner. Furthermore, we can’t find any larger event that could plausibly be more closely linked to the English Sweating Sickness; in this case, even the most careful inquiries don’t penetrate the thick veil hiding the mysterious causes of epidemics.

Sect. 4.—Habits of the English.

That next to the peculiar constitution which England imparts to her inhabitants, the predisposing causes of the Sweating 213Sickness lay in the habits of the English of those times, no one can possibly doubt. The limitation of the pestilence to England plainly indicates this. Not a single ship conveyed it to the French, or to the Dutch, who breathed a much moister atmosphere; and yet the intercourse between the English seaports and these immediately neighbouring nations was very frequent. Of intemperance, which most generally lays the foundation for disorders, both high and low were at this time accused. This vice of the English was proverbial in foreign countries[114]. Flesh meats highly seasoned with spices were indulged in to excess; noisy nocturnal carousings were become customary, and it was also the practice to drink strong wine[115] immediately after rising in the morning. Cyder, which in some parts, as for instance in Devonshire, is the common beverage[116], was, even in those times, considered by medical men as injurious, for it was observed that its use caused debility with paleness, and sapped the vigour of youth in both sexes[117]. Other similar facts respecting the mode of living at that time might perhaps be adduced, from which it would appear that, owing to the total want of refinement in diet, much that was improper was employed in English cookery, and that on this account the constitution was much injured. Horticulture, which the French had already brought to a state of great improvement[118], was still quite in its infancy in England. It is even said that Queen Catherine had pot-herbs brought from Holland for the preparation of salads, as they were not procurable in England[119]. Allowing that this account may not be strictly true, since it admits of other explanations, still it proves in itself what we would here enforce, and leaves us to draw conclusions from it beyond the mere fact of there being a scarcity of culinary vegetables. Much more important, however, as respects our subject, was the custom of wearing immoderately warm clothing, of which we have accounts worthy of credence. From youth upwards the head was 214covered with thick caps, in order to secure it from every chance of cold, and from the least draught of air; and as, by this injurious practice, the brain was subjected to a continual determination of blood, and a tenderness of the skin was induced, there was no disorder more frequent among the English in this century than catarrh[120], which was constantly reproduced by relaxing perspirations and heating medicines. If this malady be complicated with a scorbutic habit, or if it befall persons of debauched habits, whose vessels contain nourishment not properly concocted, the preservative vital power seeks a vent through the relaxed skin, and that which in itself is a needful and alleviating excitement of this tissue becomes a disease; the wholesome excretion degenerates into a colliquative drain, which forcibly carries off with it unusual animal matters that ought not to pass away through such an outlet, and the body yields to an attack to which it has been thus long predisposed. When we consider this debilitated state of the skin as the general complaint in England, taking into account the prejudicial influence of hot baths[121], which were much in use, and the diaphoretic medicines employed in most disorders; when we bear in mind the rare use of soap at that time, and the high price of linen, as also the extreme indigence of the lower classes, which almost always breeds pestilences, the utterly miserable condition and truly Scythian filth of the English habitations[122], and finally, the crowded state of London in the year 1517, we shall, as far as human research can penetrate, find the origin of the Sweating Sickness in this very year 215explicable from causes which have long been known to be capable of producing such effects. Something remains in the background, of which hereafter.

That next to the strange way of life that England gave to its people, the main reasons for the Sweating Sickness come from the habits of the English at that time, and no one can really argue with that. The fact that the epidemic was limited to England clearly shows this. Not a single ship carried it to the French or Dutch, who lived in a much more humid environment; yet, the trade between the English ports and these nearby countries was quite frequent. Both the upper and lower classes were accused of excesses that generally lead to health issues. This reputation for intemperance was well-known abroad. Richly spiced meats were overindulged, wild late-night parties became normal, and it was also common to drink strong wine right after waking up in the morning. Cider, which in some areas, like Devonshire, was the usual drink, was already seen by doctors at the time as harmful, as it was noted that its consumption led to weakness and paleness, draining the vitality of youth in both genders. Other similar examples of living habits from that time could be brought up, showing that due to a complete lack of refinement in diet, many improper ingredients were used in English cooking, harming the overall health. Horticulture, which the French had already advanced significantly, was still very basic in England. It’s even said that Queen Catherine had to import leafy greens from Holland for salads because they weren’t available in England. Even if this story isn’t entirely accurate, since it could be explained in other ways, it still indicates what we’re emphasizing here and encourages us to draw conclusions beyond just the lack of vegetables. However, what's more relevant to our topic is the habit of wearing excessively warm clothing, which we have reliable accounts of. From a young age, people covered their heads with thick caps to protect against cold and drafts; this harmful practice resulted in a constant increase of blood flow to the brain and created sensitivity in the skin, leading to frequent cases of the common cold among the English during this century. This was constantly exacerbated by excessive sweating and warm medications. If this illness combined with a scurvy condition, or affected people with poor habits whose bodies had improperly processed nutrients, then the body's defense mechanisms would attempt to escape through the relaxed skin, turning what should be a necessary bodily function into a disease. Healthy excretion would transform into a draining condition that removed unusual substances that shouldn't leave the body this way, making the body vulnerable to an attack it had long been predisposed to. When we consider this weakened condition of the skin as a widespread issue in England, alongside the harmful effects of hot baths which were commonly used, the sweating medicines used for most ailments, the rare use of soap then, and the high cost of linen, as well as the extreme poverty of the lower classes—almost always breeding disease—the dreadful state and true filth of English living conditions, and finally, the crowded nature of London in the year 1517, we will find, as far as human research can determine, the origins of the Sweating Sickness in that very year can be explained by well-known causes that have long been understood to produce such effects. More will be revealed on this later.

Sect. 5.—Contagion.

The rapid spread of the Sweating Sickness all over England as far as the Scottish borders, and across to Calais, now demands a more especial consideration. Most fevers which are produced by general causes, as well transient (epidemic) as constant and peculiar to the country (endemic), or a union of both, which almost always takes place, and was here evidently the case, propagate themselves for a time spontaneously. The exhalations of the affected become the germs of a similar decomposition in those bodies which receive them, and produce in these a like attack upon the internal organs; and thus a merely morbid phenomenon of life shews that it possesses the fundamental property of all life, that of propagating itself in an appropriate soil. On this point there is no doubt,—the phenomena which prove it have been observed from time immemorial, in an endless variety of circumstances, but always with a uniform manifestation of the fundamental law. All nations too, and from the most ancient times, have invented ingenious designations for these occurrences, which, however, seldom represent the general notion, but commonly only the peculiar propagation of individual diseases. Certainly one of the best and the most ingenious is that which is conveyed by the German word “Ansteckung,” “setting on fire,” which compares the exciting a disease in the appropriate body, with the inflammation of combustible matter by the application of fire, or with the kindling of powder by a spark. But how various are these “Ansteckungen!”, from the purely mental, on the one hand, which, through the mere sight of a disagreeable nervous malady—through an excitement of the senses that shakes the mind, penetrates into the nerves, those channels of its will and of its feelings, and produces the same disorder in the beholder, to those, on the other hand, which propagate diseases that principally operate only upon matter, and are distinguishable but little, if at all, from animal poisons. The reader must not here expect all the features of a doctrine which extends through the whole immeasurable domain of life. They216 are clearly derived from the confirmed and well applied experience of the past, and have been delineated by men[123] who had not forgotten, like their modern successors, to take a comprehensive view of epidemic diseases. It may, however, be permitted me just to call to mind the difference between those infectious diseases which are permanent and for centuries together unchangeable, and those which are temporary and transient. The infecting matter of the former may aptly be called the perfect or unchangeable in contradistinction to the imperfect or mutable character of the latter. The former, when once formed, whether in diseased persons or inanimate substances (fomites), are always in existence, and are but called into activity by those causes of general disease (epidemic constitutions) which are favourable to their propagation; and it is to be remarked that under all circumstances, and at all times, they excite the same unchangeable diseases, and, varying only in particular ramifications or degenerations and mild forms, never lose their proper essence. Examples are furnished in the small-pox, the plague, the measles, and, if we may include diseases not febrile, the leprosy, the itch, and the venereal disease. The latter, on the other hand, are not always in existence, they are called forth from nonentity by the causes of general diseases or epidemic constitutions, and they disappear again after the extinction of the epidemic diseases by which they were bred; they likewise vary in their development and their course in each particular epidemic. Examples are found in the yellow fever, in catarrh or influenza, in nervous and putrid fever, and, among many other disorders, in miliary fever, a disease which first grew to a national pestilence in the 17th century, and which, in the kind and manner of its infecting power, approaches nearest to the sweating fever. To this latter category the English Sweating Sickness likewise belongs; a disease altogether of a temporary character, which, after its cessation, left no infecting material behind, and consequently was incapable of propagating itself after the manner of those diseases which are completely contagious. The animal matters, which were expelled along with the profuse perspiration, and spread so horrible a stench around the sick, contained amid their alkaline salts, (probably ammonia in various states of combination,) and their superabundant 217acid, the ferment of the disease; and this penetrated into the lungs of the bystanders as they breathed, and provided they were but predisposed for its reception, as above stated, continually produced it. It may be considered as certain that mere manual contact was not sufficient to communicate the infection, and that this was propagated, either by the pestilential atmosphere which surrounded the beds of the sick, or by exhalations generated in unclean situations where there was no vent for their escape. On this account it was that the residence at common inns and public-houses was looked upon as dangerous[124].

The quick spread of the Sweating Sickness throughout England, as far as the Scottish borders and across to Calais, now requires more careful consideration. Most fevers that arise from general causes, whether temporary (epidemic) or persistent and unique to the area (endemic), or a mix of both—which, in this case, was clearly the situation—tend to spread on their own for a while. The exhalations from the infected become the sources of similar decay in those who come into contact with them, causing the same attack on their internal organs. Thus, a simple abnormal condition in life shows that it has the fundamental property of all life: the ability to reproduce itself in a suitable environment. There’s no doubt about this—the evidence has been observed throughout history in countless situations, always demonstrating the same fundamental principle. All nations, too, from ancient times, have come up with creative terms for these occurrences, which usually don’t capture the general idea but often reflect the specific spread of individual diseases. One of the most clever and fitting terms is the German word “Ansteckung,” meaning “setting on fire,” which likens the triggering of a disease in a susceptible body to igniting combustible material with fire or igniting gunpowder with a spark. But how varied these “Ansteckungen!” are—from purely mental ones, which can spark a disorder through merely seeing an unpleasant nervous illness that shocks the senses, invades the nerves (the pathways of will and feelings), and causes the same disorder in the observer, to others that spread diseases primarily affecting the physical body and are hardly distinguishable from animal poisons. The reader shouldn’t expect all the features of a concept that encompasses the vast realm of life here. They are clearly based on well-established and properly applied experiences of the past and have been outlined by people who didn’t forget, like their modern counterparts, to take a broad view of epidemic diseases. However, I should remind you of the difference between infectious diseases that are permanent and unchanging over centuries and those that are temporary and fleeting. The infectious matter of the former can be aptly referred to as perfect or unchangeable, in contrast to the imperfect or mutable nature of the latter. Once formed, whether in infected individuals or inanimate objects (fomites), the former always exist and are activated by general disease factors (epidemic conditions) that promote their spread; and it should be noted that under all circumstances and at all times, they invoke the same unchanging diseases, varying only in specific branches or milder forms without losing their essential nature. Examples include smallpox, the plague, measles, and, if we consider non-febrile diseases, leprosy, scabies, and sexually transmitted diseases. On the other hand, the latter don’t always exist; they are triggered from nothingness by general disease causes or epidemic conditions and disappear again after the epidemic diseases that produced them have ended; they also vary in their presentation and progression during each epidemic. Examples include yellow fever, colds or influenza, nervous and putrid fever, and, among many other disorders, miliary fever, a disease that became a national plague in the 17th century and, in terms of its infectious nature, is most similar to the sweating fever. The English Sweating Sickness also falls into this latter category; it is a completely temporary disease that, after it ended, left no infectious material behind and therefore could not spread like fully contagious diseases. The animal matter expelled with the heavy sweating and giving off a horrible odor around the sick contained alkaline salts (probably ammonia in various forms) and their excess acidity, which acted as the disease's ferment; this permeated the lungs of bystanders as they breathed, continually causing the disease provided they were predisposed to receive it, as stated above. It is likely that mere physical contact was not enough to transmit the infection and that it spread either through the toxic atmosphere surrounding the sick or through exhalations produced in filthy places where there was no way for them to disperse. Because of this, staying at common inns and pubs was considered dangerous.

I would not, however, be understood to maintain that, during the three epidemics with which, up to the present stage of our inquiry, we have become acquainted, the spread of the sweating fever alone was occasioned by infection; for if the general epidemic causes were powerful enough to excite the disease, without any previously existing poison, why might they not produce the same effect still more independently throughout the course of the pestilence, since, as is the case in all epidemics, those causes in all probability continued to increase in intensity? That the plague grew worse on the occasion of any great assemblages of the people, was at that time known, and the notion of contagion thence very naturally arose. Yet, must it here be taken into account, that even without this notion, and merely from the assemblage itself of many people in whom the like malady was germinating, and already had shewn tokens of its approach, that approach might easily be accelerated, and the disease increased among those merely slightly indisposed, by the reciprocal communication of morbid exhalations. For as the predisposition to any malady, which is an intermediate condition between that malady and the previous state of good health[125], plainly displays the properties of the disease in those whom it threatens to attack, so these exhalations (or epidemic causes which give rise to Sweating Sickness in the first instance) certainly differ from those which occur in a sweating sickness which has already broken out, only in unessential respects, and might consequently stimulate the mere disposition to the disease more and more, 218even to the actual eruption of the disease itself. Yet a contagion was likewise in operation at the same time which was destructive even to the temperate, and to those who were apparently in health, nay, even to foreigners, who were living in an English atmosphere and on English food, as the example of the Italian Ammonius plainly proves[126].

I wouldn't, however, want anyone to think that, during the three epidemics we've studied so far, the spread of the sweating fever was solely caused by infection. If the general causes of the epidemic were strong enough to trigger the disease without any existing poison, why couldn't they cause the same effect even more independently throughout the course of the outbreak? Since those causes likely kept intensifying, it’s known that the plague worsened during large gatherings of people, which naturally led to the idea of contagion. However, it should be noted that even without this notion, simply from many people gathering, where some were already showing signs of the illness, the onset might be sped up, and the disease could spread among those who were only slightly unwell due to the exchange of unhealthy exhalations. Just as the predisposition to any illness, which exists between good health and the illness itself, clearly shows the characteristics of the disease in those it threatens, these exhalations (or the epidemic causes that first triggered Sweating Sickness) only differ from those present in an already active sweating sickness in minor ways. They might therefore increase the susceptibility to the disease even further, 218leading to an actual outbreak of the disease. At the same time, there was also a contagion at work that was harmful even to the healthy and temperate, as well as to foreigners living in England and consuming English food, as illustrated by the case of the Italian Ammonius.

In all epidemics which increase to such a degree as to become contagious, it is of importance to distinguish which of these causes are the more powerful, the predisposing or epidemic causes, which originate the proneness to the disease, or the proximate causes, among which, in the generality of cases, contagion is the most prominent. The predisposing were here evidently the more operative; contagion was not added till the disease was at its height, and although it contributed not a little to its spread, yet it always remained subordinate to the other sources of the disease, and all the matter of infection vanished without a trace, on the cessation of the disorder, so that the subsequent eruptions of it were always produced by the renewal of those general causes which are in operation upon and under the earth. It is, however, as little within the compass of human knowledge to discover the essential foundation of this renewal, as the proximate causes of the appearance of the mould spots at the commencement of the sixteenth century, or any other of those processes which are prepared and brought into activity by the hidden powers of nature.

In all epidemics that grow to the point of becoming contagious, it's important to identify which causes are more influential: the predisposing factors that create a tendency for the disease or the direct causes, among which contagion is usually the most significant. In this case, the predisposing factors were clearly more effective; contagion only became a factor when the disease was at its peak. While it did contribute to its spread, it always played a secondary role to the other sources of the disease, and all traces of infection disappeared when the disorder ended. Subsequent outbreaks were always caused by the re-emergence of those underlying factors affecting the Earth. However, it remains beyond human understanding to uncover the essential basis for this re-emergence, just as it is to determine the immediate causes of the mold spots that appeared at the start of the sixteenth century or any other processes triggered by the hidden forces of nature.

Sect. 6.—Influenzas.

Several epidemics thus originating in causes beyond human comprehension appeared in the 16th century. Among the most remarkable was a violent and extensive catarrhal fever in 1510, of that kind which the Italians call Influenza, thus recognising an inscrutable influence which affects numberless persons at the same time. It prevailed principally in France, but probably also over the rest of Europe, of which, however, the accounts do not inform us, for in those times they took little pains to record the particulars of epidemics which were not of a character to affect life. According to recent experience we should be warranted even in supposing that this malady had its origin in the remotest parts of the East. During the whole of the winter, 219which was very cold, violent storms of wind prevailed, and the north and middle of Italy were shaken by frequent earthquakes; whereupon there followed so general a sickness in France, that we are assured by the historians that few of the inhabitants escaped it. The catarrhal symptoms, which on the appearance of disorders of this kind usually form their commencement, seem to have been quite thrown into the background by those of violent rheumatism and inflammation. The patient was first seized with giddiness and severe headache; then came on a shooting pain through the shoulders, and extending to the thighs. The loins too were affected with intolerably painful dartings, during which an inflammatory fever set in with delirium and violent excitement. In some the parotid glands became inflamed, and even the digestive organs participated in the deep-rooted malady; for those affected had, together with constant oppression at the stomach, a great loathing for all animal food, and a dislike even to wine. Among the poor as well as the rich many died, and some quite suddenly, of this strange disease, in the treatment of which the physicians shortened life not a little by their purgative treatment and phlebotomy, seeking an excuse for their ignorance in the influence of the constellations, and alleging that astral diseases were beyond the reach of human art[127].

Several epidemics that originated from causes beyond human understanding appeared in the 16th century. Among the most notable was a severe and widespread cold-like fever in 1510, which Italians called Influenza, acknowledging an mysterious influence that affects countless people at once. It primarily spread in France, but likely also throughout the rest of Europe, although records from that time are sparse because they paid little attention to documenting epidemics that didn’t threaten life. Based on recent findings, we might even suggest that this disease originated in the far reaches of the East. Throughout the winter, 219which was extremely cold, strong winds were rampant, and the northern and central parts of Italy experienced frequent earthquakes; subsequently, this resulted in such a widespread illness in France that historians claim few residents escaped it. The cold symptoms, which typically mark the onset of such disorders, seemed to be overshadowed by intense rheumatism and inflammation. Initially, patients suffered from dizziness and severe headaches; then they experienced sharp pains radiating from the shoulders down to the thighs. The lower back was also affected by excruciating dart-like pains, during which an inflammatory fever ensued, accompanied by delirium and extreme agitation. In some cases, the parotid glands became inflamed, and even the digestive system was impacted by this deeply rooted illness; those affected experienced constant nausea, a strong aversion to all animal products, and even a dislike for wine. Many people, both poor and rich, died from this peculiar disease, some quite unexpectedly. The treatments offered by physicians often hastened death due to their purging practices and bloodletting, as they sought to explain their ignorance by blaming the positions of the stars, claiming that astral illnesses were beyond human intervention.[127].

From this prejudicial effect of our chief antiphlogistic remedy, bleeding, as well as of evacuations from the bowels, we may conclude that the disease, though in its commencement rheumatic, yet had an essential tendency to produce relaxation and debility of the nerves, and in this respect, as well as in its extension to all classes, accorded with the modern influenzas, in which the same phenomena have manifested themselves only much less vividly and plainly. The French, who, from the levity of their character, have always called serious things by jocose names, designate this disease “Coqueluche” (the monk’s hood), because, owing to the extreme sensibility of the skin to cold and currents of air, this kind of hood was generally necessary, and was a protection against an attack of the malady, as well as against its increase. That in the accounts, which are, to be sure, very incomplete, there should be no express mention of any affection of the air-passages, is remarkable, since this could not in 220all likelihood have failed to exist; although it might perhaps have been only slightly manifested. Nearly a century before (1414), this affection appeared far more prominently on the occurrence of a no less general disorder of the same kind; so that all those who had the complaint, suffered from a considerable hoarseness, and all public business in Paris was interrupted on this account[128]. It was on that very occasion that the name Coqueluche was first employed, and this having, as is well known, been transferred to the whooping-cough, it is easier to suppose, with respect to the influenza of 1510, which was similarly named, an omission in the account, than the real absence of a symptom so very generally prevalent; for in these kinds of comparisons and denominations, the common sense of the people errs much less than the learned profundity of political historians.

From the harmful effects of our main anti-inflammatory treatment, bleeding, as well as bowel evacuations, we can conclude that the disease, although it starts off as rheumatic, definitely leads to relaxation and weakness of the nerves. In this way, just like modern flu outbreaks, it affects all demographics, showing similar but less intense symptoms. The French, known for their playful approach, call this illness “Coqueluche” (the monk’s hood), because the extreme sensitivity of the skin to cold and drafts made wearing this type of hood necessary for protection against both the sickness and its worsening. It's interesting that the reports, though quite incomplete, don’t specifically mention any issues with the air passages, as it’s likely that such issues existed but perhaps were only mildly noticeable. Nearly a century earlier (in 1414), a similar widespread disorder presented itself with much more noticeable symptoms, leading everyone affected to experience significant hoarseness, which even halted public affairs in Paris at that time. It was during this event that the term Coqueluche was first used. Given that this name has famously been associated with whooping cough, it seems more plausible that the accounts of the 1510 influenza, which had a similar name, might have omitted symptoms rather than truly lacked a widely prevalent symptom; after all, in these sorts of comparisons and naming, the common knowledge of the public is often more accurate than the complex analyses of scholarly political historians.

We must not omit here to remark that three years before (1411), and thirteen years afterwards, two diseases entirely similar and equally general, made their appearance in France, of which we nowhere find that any notice has been taken up to the present time. The first was called Tac, the second Ladendo, which designations have since entirely gone out of use. Both were accompanied by very severe cough, so that in the former, ruptures not unfrequently occurred, and pregnant women were in consequence prematurely confined, and by the latter, from its universality, the public worship was disturbed. In the ladendo, there seems to have been an affection of the kidney of an inflammatory character, and much more severe than in the coqueluche of 1510, a memorable example of epidemic influence, and without a parallel in modern times. This pain in the kidneys, which was as severe as a fit of the stone, was followed by fever with loss of appetite, and an incessant cough that terminated in disagreeable eruptions about the mouth and nose. The disorder ran a course of about fifteen days, and was generally prevalent throughout October, being unattended with danger, notwithstanding the severity of its symptoms. One might almost be tempted to regard the tac of 1411 as the coqueluche of 1414, which is only slightly alluded to by 221Mezeray, and whereof the author from whom we are now quoting, has made no mention; for a false date might easily occur here. Yet this must remain undecided until we can obtain fuller information, for we have experienced, even in the most recent times, an example of influenzas (1831 and 1833) following each other in quick succession. Gastric symptoms and an inordinate degree of irritability accompanied the spasmodic cough, and the complaint terminated with evacuations of blood. However, the disease was unattended with danger, and lasted upon the whole only three weeks[129].

We should point out that three years earlier (1411), and thirteen years later, two diseases that were very similar and equally widespread appeared in France, yet we find no record of them to this day. The first was called Tac, the second Ladendo, terms that have since fallen out of use. Both were marked by a severe cough, causing ruptures in some cases, and pregnant women often delivered prematurely due to the first disease. The second disease, due to its widespread nature, disrupted public worship. In the ladendo, there appeared to be a kidney inflammation far more severe than the coqueluche of 1510, a notable example of an epidemic that has no parallel in modern times. This kidney pain, as intense as a kidney stone attack, was followed by fever and loss of appetite, along with an unrelenting cough that led to unpleasant rashes around the mouth and nose. The illness lasted about fifteen days and was commonly seen throughout October, not posing any real danger despite its severe symptoms. One might almost think of the tac of 1411 as being the same as the coqueluche of 1414, which is only briefly mentioned by 221Mezeray, and the author we are quoting now does not mention it; a mistaken date could easily have been noted here. However, this remains uncertain until we can gather more information, as we have seen, even in recent times, examples of influenzas (1831 and 1833) following closely one after the other. Gastric symptoms and extreme irritability accompanied the spasmodic cough, which ended with blood expulsions. Still, the disease wasn’t dangerous, lasting only about three weeks.[129].

Four other epidemics similar to that of 1510 appeared in the sixteenth century, two which were quite general in the years 1557 and 1580, and two less extensively prevalent in the years 1551 and 1564[130]. Of the two former we possess accurate descriptions; it will therefore aid us in forming a correct judgment respecting the influenza of 1510, if we here take a review of these also, since the most experienced contemporaries classed all these disorders together as of a similar kind. During the dry unfavourable summer of 1557, invalids 222were suddenly seized with hoarseness and oppression at the chest, accompanied with a pressure on the head, and followed by shivering and such a violent cough, that they thought they should be suffocated, especially during the night. This cough was dry at first, but about the seventh day, or even later, an abundant secretion took place either of thick mucus or of thin frothy fluid. Upon this the cough somewhat abated, and the breathing became freer. During the whole course of the disorder, however, patients complained of insufferable languor, loss of strength, want of appetite and even nausea at the sight of food, restlessness and want of sleep. The malady ended in most cases in abundant perspiration, but occasionally in diarrhœa. Rich and poor, people of every occupation and of all ages, were seized with this disease in whole crowds simultaneously, and it passed easily from a single case to a whole household. On this occasion death rarely occurred, except in children who had not power to endure the severity of the cough, and medicine was of little avail, either in alleviating the disorder or arresting its destructive course. The already established name of this disease was immediately called to mind again in France. It was not, however, confined to that kingdom, but prevailed as generally, with some considerable varieties of form, in Italy, Germany, Holland, and doubtless over a still wider range of country[131]. The same was the case with the influenza of 1580, which spread over the whole of Europe, and seems to have been less severe; thus bearing a closer resemblance[132] to that of 1831 and 1833, which is still in the recollection of most of our readers from their own experience. A more elaborate research into this very important subject would far surpass the limits of this treatise, for phenomena deeply affecting 223the whole system of human collective life are here to be considered, which can only become apparent when received as a connected whole, yet we must at least point out the relation which the influenzas bear to the greater epidemics. This is quite apparent; for as catarrhs are not unfrequently the forerunners, accompaniments or sequelæ of important diseases in individual cases[133], excitement of the mucous membrane being often merely an outward sign of more deeply seated commotion, so also are influenzas usually only the first manifestations, but sometimes also the last remains of extensive epidemics. The most recent example is still fresh in our memories. The influenza of 1831 was immediately followed by the Indian cholera, and scarcely had this, after its revival in Eastern and central Europe, vanished, when the influenza of 1833 appeared, as if to announce a general peace. After the influenza of 1510, a plague followed in the north of Europe, which in Denmark carried off the son of King John[134]; 1551 was the year of the fifth epidemic sweating sickness. In 1557, the influenza in Holland, was followed by a bubo plague, which lasted the following year, and carried off 5000 of the inhabitants at Delft[135]. In 1564, a very destructive plague raged in Spain, of which 10,000 people died at Barcelona, and finally, in 1580, the last year of influenza in that century, a plague of which 40,000 died in Paris, appeared over the greater part of Europe and in Egypt[136].

Four other epidemics similar to the one in 1510 appeared in the sixteenth century, two that were quite widespread in the years 1557 and 1580, and two that were less prevalent in the years 1551 and 1564[130]. We have detailed descriptions of the two earlier ones; reviewing these will help us form a clearer judgment about the influenza of 1510, since experienced contemporaries grouped all these illnesses together as similar. During the dry and unfavorable summer of 1557, patients suddenly experienced hoarseness and chest pressure, accompanied by headaches, shivering, and a severe cough that made them feel like they were suffocating, especially at night. This cough started dry, but around the seventh day, or even later, it produced either thick mucus or thin frothy fluid. Following this, the cough calmed down a bit, and breathing became easier. Throughout the illness, however, patients reported extreme fatigue, weakness, a lack of appetite, and even nausea at the sight of food, along with restlessness and insomnia. The illness typically ended in heavy sweating, but sometimes resulted in diarrhea. People from all walks of life, regardless of age, were affected by this disease in large numbers, and it readily spread from one person to an entire household. Death was uncommon except for children who couldn't withstand the severity of the cough, and medicine offered little relief in alleviating the condition or stopping its effects. The already known name for this disease quickly came to mind in France. However, it wasn't restricted to that country; it also spread widely, with some notable variations, in Italy, Germany, Holland, and likely across an even broader area[131]. The same was true for the influenza of 1580, which spread throughout Europe and seemed to be less severe; it resembled more closely[132] the influenza outbreaks of 1831 and 1833, which many of our readers likely remember from personal experience. A more detailed investigation into this significant topic would exceed the scope of this treatise, as we would have to consider phenomena that deeply impact 223 the entirety of human collective life, which can only be understood as a connected whole. Nonetheless, we must highlight the connection between influenza and larger epidemics. This is quite clear; just as catarrhs often precede, accompany, or follow major diseases in individual cases[133], with irritation of the mucous membrane often just an outward sign of deeper unrest, so are influenzas typically only the initial signs, but sometimes also the last remnants of major epidemics. The most recent example is still fresh in our memories. The influenza of 1831 was immediately followed by Indian cholera, and scarcely had this subsided after its resurgence in Eastern and Central Europe than the influenza of 1833 appeared, almost as if to herald a general peace. After the influenza of 1510, a plague followed in Northern Europe, which, in Denmark, claimed the life of King John's son[134]; 1551 was the year of the fifth epidemic of sweating sickness. In 1557, the influenza in Holland was followed by a bubo plague, which continued into the next year and claimed 5,000 lives in Delft[135]. In 1564, a devastating plague swept through Spain, resulting in the deaths of 10,000 people in Barcelona, and finally, in 1580, the last year of influenza in that century, a plague that killed 40,000 in Paris spread across much of Europe and Egypt[136].

Sect. 7.—Epidemics of 1517.

We now revert to the year 1517, and shall consider the epidemics which accompanied the English sweating sickness. First of all, the Hauptkrankheit, that brain fever which so often recurred in the central parts of Europe, appeared extensively throughout Germany. Many died of this dangerous disease, and we are assured by contemporaries that other inter-current inflammatory fevers were also very fatal[137]. Such was the 224case in Germany, the heart of Europe. Another disease, however, much more important, and till that time wholly unknown to medical men, appeared in Holland, which broke out in January, 1517, and from its dangerous and quite inexplicable symptoms, spread fear and horror around. It was a malignant, and, according to the assurance of a very respectable medical eye-witness, an infectious inflammation of the throat, so rapid in its course that, unless assistance were procured within the first eight hours, the patient was past all hope of recovery before the close of the day. Sudden pains in the throat, and violent oppression of the chest, especially in the region of the heart, threatened suffocation, and at length actually produced it. During the paroxysms the muscles of the throat and chest were seized with violent spasm, and there were but short intervals of alleviation before a repetition of such seizures terminated in death. Unattended by any premonitory symptoms, the disease began with a severe catarrhal affection of the chest, which speedily advanced to inflammation of the air passages, and where death did not occur on the day of the attack, ran on to a dangerous inflammation of the lungs, which followed the usual course, but was accompanied by a very high fever. Occasionally a less perilous transition into intermittent fever was observed, but in no case did a sudden recovery take place; for even when the fever subsided, the patient continued to suffer, for at least a month, from pain in the stomach and great debility, which symptoms admit of easy explanation to a medical man of the present day, from the fissures and small ulcers of the tongue, which appeared when the fever was at its height, and obstinately resisted the usual treatment.

We now go back to the year 1517 and will look at the epidemics that came with the English sweating sickness. First off, the Hauptkrankheit, the brain fever that frequently occurred in central Europe, spread widely across Germany. Many people died from this dangerous illness, and contemporary sources tell us that other inflammatory fevers also caused numerous fatalities[137]. Such was the situation in Germany, the heart of Europe. However, another disease, much more significant and previously unknown to doctors, emerged in Holland, breaking out in January 1517. Its severe and inexplicable symptoms instilled fear and horror. It was a malignant throat inflammation, infectious and, according to a credible medical eyewitness, so swift that if help wasn’t received within the first eight hours, the patient lost all hope of recovery by the end of the day. Patients experienced sudden throat pain and intense pressure in the chest, especially near the heart, which led to suffocation and eventually caused it. During the episodes, the throat and chest muscles went into violent spasms, with only brief moments of relief before another seizure that often ended in death. The illness started abruptly without warning symptoms, beginning as a severe cold in the chest that quickly progressed to inflammation of the airways. If death didn’t occur on the day of the attack, it turned into a serious lung inflammation, following the typical progression but accompanied by a very high fever. Sometimes, a less serious shift to intermittent fever was seen, but in no instance did a sudden recovery happen; even when the fever went down, the patient remained in pain and greatly weakened for at least a month. These symptoms can be easily explained by today's medical standards as they relate to the fissures and small ulcers on the tongue that developed when the fever peaked, resisting standard treatments.

The remedies employed shew the circumspection and ability of the Dutch physicians. They had recourse, as soon as possible, at the latest within six hours, to venesection, and followed this up immediately by purgatives, of which, however, some eminent men disapproved, and this to the great detriment of their patients, for without the combined effect of both these means, the sudden suffocation could not be averted. Moreover, the employment of detergent gargles, whereby the extension of the affection to the lungs was prevented, as also of demulcent pectoral remedies, was decidedly beneficial, and it is affirmed that all who were thus treated were easily restored[138].

The treatments used show the caution and skill of the Dutch doctors. They quickly resorted to bloodletting, usually within six hours, and immediately followed this with laxatives, although some prominent figures disapproved of this approach, which significantly harmed their patients because without the combined effects of both methods, sudden suffocation couldn't be avoided. Additionally, using soothing gargles helped prevent the spread of the illness to the lungs, as well as using soothing chest remedies, which was definitely beneficial. It's claimed that everyone treated this way made a quick recovery.[138].

225

225

Extraordinary and peculiar as this disease, for which contemporaries found no name, was, its rapid onset and its sudden disappearance were still more so. Most of those affected were taken ill at the same time, and eleven days of suffering and misery had scarcely elapsed when not another case occurred; the numbers who had fallen victims were buried; and but for the journal of the worthy Tyengius[139], no distinct record would have existed of this remarkable epidemic, which however, it is certain, spread further than merely over the misty territory of Holland, and apparently with still greater malignity; for in the same year we find it in Basle, where, within the space of eight months, it destroyed about 2000 people, and its symptoms would seem to have been still more strongly marked. Respecting the intermediate countries, which it is highly probable that the disease passed through from Holland before it reached Basle, we unfortunately have no information. The tongue and gullet were white as if covered with mould, the patient had an aversion to food and drink, and suffered from malignant fever, accompanied with continued headache and delirium. Here also, in addition to an internal method of cure which has not been particularly detailed, the cleansing of the mouth was perceived to be an essential part of the treatment: the viscous white coating was removed every two hours, and the tongue and fauces were afterwards smeared with honey of roses[140], whereby patients were restored more easily than when this precaution was omitted[141].

Extraordinary and unusual as this disease, which people of the time couldn't name, was, its quick onset and sudden disappearance were even more surprising. Most of those affected got sick at the same time, and after just eleven days of suffering and misery, not another case was reported; those who had died were buried; and if not for the journal of the honorable Tyengius[139], there would be no clear record of this remarkable epidemic. However, it’s certain that it spread beyond the foggy lands of Holland, apparently with even greater severity; in the same year, it appeared in Basel, where, in the span of eight months, it claimed about 2000 lives, and its symptoms seemed to be even more pronounced. Unfortunately, we don’t have any information about the countries in between, through which the disease likely passed from Holland before reaching Basel. The tongue and throat were white as if covered in mold, the patients had a strong aversion to food and drink, and they suffered from a severe fever, accompanied by constant headaches and delirium. Additionally, besides an internal treatment that hasn't been described in detail, it was recognized that cleaning the mouth was a key part of the treatment: the thick white coating was removed every two hours, and then the tongue and throat were coated with rose honey[140], which helped patients recover more easily than when this precaution was skipped[141].

It appears, according to modern experience, to admit of no doubt that this disease consisted of an inflammation of the mucous membrane which, accompanied by a secretion of lymph, spread from the œsophagus to the stomach, and likewise through the air passages to the lungs, being thus identical 226with pharyngeal croup, which was represented a few years ago as a new disease, and has in consequence been designated by a special name[142]. Its subsequent appearance in the memorable year 1557, respecting which we have a still more complete account, gives additional weight to this supposition. In that year it broke out in October, and was observed by Forest, who was himself the subject of it, at Alkmaar, where it attacked whole families, and in the course of a few weeks destroyed more than 200 people. It was not, however, so excessively rapid in its course as in 1517, but began with a slight fever like a common catarrh, and shewed its great malignity only by degrees. Sudden fits of suffocation then came on, and the pain of the chest was so dreadfully distressing that the sufferers imagined they must die in the paroxysm. The complaint was increased still more by a tight convulsive cough, and until this was relieved by a secretion of mucus, proved dangerous, especially to pregnant women, sixteen of whom died within the space of eight days, whilst those who survived were all prematurely brought to bed. The fever which accompanied the inflammation was very various in its course. It was rarely observed to continue without intermission, but where this was the case, was attended with the greatest peril. Yet death did not take place on this visitation until the ninth or fourteenth day, whereas in the year 1517 as many hours would have sufficed to produce a fatal termination. After this period the danger diminished, and those patients were most secure from suffocation, provided they had good medical attendance, whose complaint had been accompanied throughout its course by fever of only an intermittent character. So marked was the influence of the Dutch soil, that until this intermittent passed into continued fever of different gradations, it appeared of the purest and most unmixed type. In these cases the inflammation was less completely formed, so that even bleeding, a remedy otherwise indispensable, was sometimes unnecessary. Those affected all suffered most at night and in the morning, the latter generally bringing with it the inflammation of the larynx and trachea, which, however, they had not at that time experience enough to recognise as such, perceiving as they did only a slight redness in the fauces. The painful affection of the stomach was also in this epidemic very distinctly 227marked, so that a sense of pressure at the præcordia, accompanied by continual acid eructations, continued to exist even after a succession of six or seven fits of fever; and convalescents were troubled for a long time with dyspepsia, debility and hypochondriasis. The inflammation of the mucous membrane, no doubt, affected the nervous plexuses of the abdomen, as is usually the case, and totally changed the secretion. This was proved by the treatment, for, by administering the necessary purgative remedies, a vast quantity of offensive mucus, mixed with bile, was evacuated.

It seems, based on modern experience, there is no doubt that this disease was an inflammation of the mucous membrane that, accompanied by lymph secretion, spread from the esophagus to the stomach and also through the airways to the lungs, making it the same as pharyngeal croup. A few years ago, this condition was described as a new disease and has since been given a special name[142]. Its later occurrence in the notable year 1557, for which we have a more detailed account, adds weight to this belief. That year, it broke out in October and was observed by Forest, who was personally affected by it, in Alkmaar, where it attacked entire families and resulted in the deaths of over 200 people in just a few weeks. However, it wasn’t as rapidly spread as in 1517, initially presenting with a mild fever similar to a common cold, revealing its severe nature only gradually. Sudden suffocation episodes occurred, and the chest pain was so excruciating that the victims thought they would die during the attacks. The condition worsened with a tight, convulsive cough that became dangerous, especially for pregnant women; sixteen of whom died within eight days, while the survivors all gave birth prematurely. The fever accompanying the inflammation varied widely in its progression. It was rarely observed to be continuous, and when it was, it posed the greatest danger. Still, death didn’t usually occur until the ninth or fourteenth day, while in 1517, fatal outcomes could happen within mere hours. After this point, the danger decreased, and patients were safer from suffocation, especially if they had good medical care and their illness featured only intermittent fever throughout its course. The Dutch environment had such a significant effect that until this intermittent fever turned into a continued fever of different levels, it seemed to be of the purest and most untainted type. In these cases, the inflammation was less severe, meaning that even bleeding, typically an essential remedy, was sometimes unnecessary. Those affected experienced the most discomfort at night and in the morning, with the latter often introducing laryngeal and tracheal inflammation, which they didn’t yet have the knowledge to recognize, only noting a slight redness in the throat. The painful stomach condition was also notably evident in this epidemic, causing a sensation of pressure in the chest, along with continuous acid burps, persisting even after several episodes of fever; convalescents dealt with dyspepsia, weakness, and anxiety for a long time afterward. The inflammation of the mucous membrane likely affected the abdominal nerve networks, as usually happens, completely altering secretion. This was confirmed through treatment, as using necessary purgative remedies expelled a large amount of foul mucus mixed with bile.

Our excellent eye-witness assures us that the people sickened as suddenly as if they had inhaled a poisonous blast, so that more than a thousand people in Alkmaar betook themselves to their beds in a single day, a thick stinking mist having previously for several days spread over the land. This pestilence did not terminate so speedily as that of the year 1517; on the contrary, it delayed until the winter, and seems to have formed the conclusion of a whole series of morbid phenomena, particularly of the already mentioned influenza throughout Europe, and of the bubo plague in Holland, which had occurred in the middle of the summer,—phenomena that were accompanied by the usual attendants of epidemics, namely great scarcity, and unusual occurrences in the atmosphere, such, for instance, as electric illuminations of prominent objects, and so forth[143].

Our reliable eyewitness tells us that people got sick just as suddenly as if they had breathed in a toxic cloud, causing more than a thousand people in Alkmaar to go to bed in one day, after a thick, foul mist had settled over the area for several days. This outbreak didn't end as quickly as the one in 1517; instead, it dragged on until winter and seemed to wrap up a whole series of health issues, particularly the flu outbreak that had been affecting Europe and the bubo plague in Holland that happened in the middle of summer. These events were accompanied by the usual signs of epidemics, such as widespread scarcity and strange atmospheric occurrences, like electric lights appearing around prominent objects, and so on[143].

The close connexion between this inflammation of the air-passages and gullet and the epidemic catarrh is quite apparent; for these are but gradations and gradual transitions in the affection of the mucous membrane, as also in the power of atmospherical causes, which especially influence the organs of respiration. We believe, therefore, that we are fully justified in classing the epidemic described to have taken place in Holland and Germany in 1517, with the influenzas; and in declaring the morbid commotion in human collective life which thus manifested itself, to have been a forerunner of the English pestilence, which was simultaneously prepared by the altered condition of the atmosphere, and broke out a few months later.

The close connection between this inflammation of the airways and throat and the outbreak of catarrh is quite clear; these are just different stages and transitions in the condition of the mucous membrane, as well as in the effect of atmospheric factors, which particularly impact the respiratory organs. We believe, therefore, that we are completely justified in classifying the epidemic that occurred in Holland and Germany in 1517 alongside the influenzas; and in stating that the widespread disturbance in human life that manifested itself was a precursor to the English plague, which was simultaneously triggered by the altered state of the atmosphere and broke out a few months later.

We ought not to omit here to mention that, in this same year, 1517, the small-pox, and with it, as field-poppies among corn, the measles, was conveyed by Europeans to Hispaniola, and 228committed dreadful ravages at that time, as afterwards, among the unfortunate inhabitants. Whether the eruption of these infectious diseases in the new world was favoured by an epidemic influence or not, can no longer be ascertained; yet the affirmative seems probable from the fact, that the small-pox did not commit its greatest ravages in Hispaniola[144] until the following year, and, according to recent experience, those epidemic influences which extend from Europe westward, always require some time to reach the eastern coasts of America.

We shouldn't fail to mention that, in the same year, 1517, smallpox, along with measles, was brought by Europeans to Hispaniola, causing terrible devastation at that time, as well as later, among the unfortunate inhabitants. Whether the outbreak of these infectious diseases in the New World was influenced by an epidemic factor or not can no longer be determined; however, it's likely, considering that smallpox didn't inflict its worst damage in Hispaniola until the following year, and recent experience shows that epidemic influences from Europe moving west typically take some time to reach the eastern coasts of America.

But even without this phenomenon in the New World, which is now for the first time placed within the pale of observations on epidemics, we have facts at hand sufficiently numerous and worthy of credit to prove—that the English Sweating Sickness of 1517, made its appearance, not alone, but surrounded by a whole group of epidemics, and that these were called forth by general morbific influences of an unknown nature.

But even without this phenomenon in the New World, which is now for the first time considered within the scope of epidemic observations, we have enough credible facts to demonstrate—that the English Sweating Sickness of 1517 appeared not in isolation, but amidst a whole range of epidemics, and that these were triggered by widespread harmful influences of an unknown nature.


CHAPTER IV.
THE FOURTH OUTBREAK OF THE DISEASE.—1528, 1529.


“Und wenn die Welt voll Teufel wär’,
Und wollten uns verschlingen;
So fürchten wir uns nicht so sehr,
Es soll uns doch gelingen!”—Luther.

Sect. 1.—Destruction of the French Army before Naples, 1528.

The events to which we are now about to allude, demonstrate, by their surprising course, that the fate of nations is at times far more dependent on the laws of physical life than on the will of potentates or the collective efforts of human action, and that these prove utterly impotent when opposed to the unfettered powers of nature. These powers, inscrutable in their dominion, destructive in their effects, stay the course of events, baffle the grandest plans, paralyse the boldest flights of the mind, and 229when victory seemed within their grasp, have often annihilated embattled hosts with the flaming sword of the angel of death.

The events we are about to discuss show, through their unexpected outcomes, that the fate of nations sometimes relies more on the laws of nature than on the desires of leaders or the combined efforts of people. When faced with the unchecked forces of nature, all human plans can prove completely powerless. These forces, mysterious in their control and devastating in their results, can change the course of events, thwart even the grandest ambitions, stifle the most daring ideas, and 229 when victory seemed within reach, have frequently wiped out entire armies with the swift strike of death.

To obliterate the disgrace of Pavia[145], Francis I. in league with England, Switzerland, Rome, Genoa and Venice against the too powerful Emperor of Germany, sent a fine army into Italy. The emperor’s troops gave way wherever the French plumes appeared, and victory seemed faithful only to the banners of France and to the military experience of a tried leader[146]. Every thing promised a glorious issue; Naples alone, weakly defended by German lansquenets and Spaniards[147], remained still to be vanquished. The siege was opened on the 1st of May, 1528, and the general confidently pledged his honour for the conquest of this strong city, which had once been so destructive to the French[148]. It was easy with an army of 30,000 veteran warriors[149] to overpower the imperialists; and a small body of English[150] seemed to have come merely to partake in the festivals after the expected victory. The city too suffered from a scarcity, for it was blockaded by Doria, with his Genoese galleys; and water, fit to drink, failed after Lautrec had turned off the aqueducts of Poggio reale; so that the plague, which had never entirely ceased among the Germans since the sacking of Rome[151], began to spread.

To erase the shame of Pavia[145], Francis I, teaming up with England, Switzerland, Rome, Genoa, and Venice against the overly powerful Emperor of Germany, sent a strong army into Italy. The emperor's troops retreated wherever the French plumes appeared, and victory seemed loyal only to the banners of France and the military experience of a seasoned leader[146]. Everything promised a glorious outcome; Naples alone, poorly defended by German landsknechts and Spaniards[147], remained to be conquered. The siege began on May 1, 1528, and the general confidently promised his honor for the capture of this strong city, which had once been so damaging to the French[148]. It was easy with an army of 30,000 seasoned warriors[149] to overpower the imperialists; and a small group of English[150] seemed to have come just to join in the celebrations after the expected victory. The city also faced a shortage, as it was blockaded by Doria and his Genoese galleys; and drinkable water ran out after Lautrec had cut off the aqueducts of Poggio reale, so the plague, which had never fully disappeared among the Germans since the sacking of Rome[151], began to spread.

But amidst this confidence in the success of the French arms, the means for ensuring it were gradually neglected. The valour of the intrepid and prudent commander was doubtless equal to the minor vicissitudes of war, but whilst the length of the delay paralysed his activity, nature herself suddenly proved fatal to this hitherto victorious army: pestilences began to rage among the troops, and human courage could no longer withstand the “far-shooting arrows of the god of day.” The consequence was, that within the space of seven weeks, out of the whole host which up to that period had been eager for combat, a mere handful remained, consisting of a few thousands of cadaverous figures, who were almost incapable of bearing arms or of following the commands of their sick leaders. On the 29th of August the 230siege was raised, fifteen days after the heroic Lautrec, bowed down by chagrin and disease, had resigned his breath; the wreck of the army retreated amid thunder and heavy rain[152], and were soon captured by the imperialists, so that but few of them ever saw their native land again.

But in the midst of their confidence in the success of the French forces, the means to ensure it were gradually ignored. The bravery of the bold and cautious commander was certainly enough to handle the smaller ups and downs of war, but as the lengthy delay limited his actions, nature itself suddenly became deadly for this previously victorious army: diseases started to spread among the troops, and human courage could no longer resist the "long-range arrows of the sun." As a result, within just seven weeks, out of the entire group that had previously been eager to fight, only a small handful remained, made up of a few thousand emaciated figures who were barely capable of wielding weapons or following the orders of their ill leaders. On August 29th, the 230 siege was lifted, fifteen days after the heroic Lautrec, weighed down by disappointment and illness, had taken his last breath; the remnants of the army retreated amid thunder and heavy rain[152], and were soon captured by the imperial forces, with only a few ever seeing their homeland again.

This siege brought still greater misery upon France than even the fatal battle of Pavia, for about 5000 of the French nobility, some from the most distinguished families, had perished under the walls of Naples; its remoter consequences too were humiliating to the king, and the people; since owing to its failure all those hitherto feasible schemes were blighted, which had for their object the establishment of French dominion beyond the Alps. It behoves us, therefore, to pay so much the more attention to those essential causes of this event, which fall within the province of medical research.

This siege brought even greater suffering to France than the disastrous battle of Pavia, as around 5,000 French nobles, including many from prominent families, died at the walls of Naples. The long-term effects were also humiliating for the king and the people, since the failure of this siege dashed all the previously viable plans aimed at establishing French control beyond the Alps. Therefore, we must pay even more attention to the key causes of this event that fall under the realm of medical research.

The mortality which occurred in the camp, began probably as early as June, after the usual calamities which surround an army in an enemy’s country. The French and Swiss were insatiable in their indulgence in fruit, which the gardens and fields furnished them in abundance, whilst there was a scarcity of bread and of other proper food[153]. Hence fevers soon broke out, which increased in malignity the longer they existed, accompanied no doubt by debilitating diarrhœas, which never fail to make their appearance under circumstances of this kind, and are in themselves among the most pernicious of camp diseases, since they not only destroy in the individual case by the exhaustion which they occasion, but likewise by infecting the air, prepare the way for the worst pestilences.

The deaths that happened in the camp probably started as early as June, following the usual misfortunes that an army faces in enemy territory. The French and Swiss became excessive in their consumption of fruit, which was plentiful in the gardens and fields, while there was a shortage of bread and other proper food[153]. As a result, fevers quickly emerged, growing more severe the longer they lasted, likely coupled with debilitating diarrhea, which always seems to occur in these situations and is one of the most harmful camp diseases. Not only does it weaken individuals through exhaustion, but it also contaminates the air, paving the way for potentially deadly epidemics.

These diseases were, however, little noticed, and there was consequently no attempt made to diminish their causes. It became daily more and more apparent, that the cutting off of the sources near Poggio reale, which Lautrec had commanded, in order to compel the besieged to a more speedy surrender, was in the highest degree injurious to the besiegers themselves; for the water, having now no outlet, spread over the plain where the camp was situated, which it converted into a swamp, whence it rose, morning and evening, in the form of thick fogs. From this cause, and while a southerly wind continued to prevail, the sickness soon became general. Those soldiers, who were 231not already confined to bed in their tents, were seen with pallid visages, swelled legs, and bloated bellies, scarcely able to crawl; so that, weary of nightly watching, they were often plundered by the marauding Neapolitans. The great mortality did not commence until about the 15th of July, but so dreadful was its ravages, that about three weeks were sufficient to complete the almost entire destruction of the army[154]. Around and within the tents vacated by the death of their inmates, noxious weeds sprang up. Thousands perished without help, either in a state of stupor, or in the raving delirium of fever[155]. In the entrenchments, in the tents, and wherever death had overtaken his victims, there unburied corpses lay, and the dead that were interred, swollen with putridity, burst their shallow graves, and spread a poisonous stench far and wide over the camp. There was no longer any thought of order or military discipline, and many of the commanders and captains were either sick themselves, or had fled to the neighbouring towns, in order to avoid the contagion[156].

These diseases were barely noticed, and as a result, no effort was made to reduce their causes. It became increasingly clear that cutting off the water sources near Poggio Reale, as Lautrec had ordered, to force the besieged to surrender sooner, was causing serious harm to the besiegers themselves. With no outlet, the water flooded the plain where the camp was located, turning it into a swamp, which created thick fogs every morning and evening. Because of this, and while a southerly wind persisted, the sickness quickly spread among the troops. Those soldiers who weren’t already bedridden in their tents were seen with pale faces, swollen legs, and bloated abdomens, barely able to move; exhausted from staying up all night, they were frequently robbed by the marauding Neapolitans. The high death toll didn't really start until around July 15th, but it was so devastating that within about three weeks, it nearly wiped out the entire army[154]. Around and within the tents abandoned by the deceased, harmful weeds began to grow. Thousands died without any assistance, either in a daze or caught in the feverish delirium[155]. In the trenches, in the tents, and wherever death found its victims, unburied bodies lay, and the dead that were buried, swollen with decay, burst from their shallow graves, spreading a noxious smell all over the camp. There was no longer any sense of order or military discipline, and many of the leaders and captains were either sick themselves or had fled to nearby towns to escape the contagion[156].

The glory of the French arms was departed, and her proud banners cowered beneath an unhallowed spectre. Meanwhile the pestilence broke out among the Venetian galleys under Pietro Lando. Doria had already gone over to the Emperor[157], and thus was this expedition, begun under the most favourable auspices, frustrated on every side by the malignant influence of the season.

The glory of the French army was gone, and their proud banners shrank beneath a dark omen. Meanwhile, a plague broke out among the Venetian galleys under Pietro Lando. Doria had already joined the Emperor[157], and so this mission, which started with the best prospects, was thwarted on all sides by the harmful effects of the season.

No medical contemporary has described the nature of this violent disease, and historians have on this point preserved only general outlines, which do not afford sufficient materials to ground an investigation. Certain it is, that in the year 1528, a very malignant petechial fever extended throughout Italy, and in the proper sense of the word prevailed so decidedly, that it even followed the Italians abroad in the same way as the Sweating Sickness did the English, as is proved by the case of the 232learned Venetian Naugerio, who, being dispatched on an embassy to Francis the 1st, died at Blois on the Loire, of this very disease, with which the French had yet no acquaintance[158]. Contemporaries assure us, that this epidemic committed great ravages in the country, already distracted by wars and feuds, and it is therefore hardly to be doubted, that, occurring as it did in those same years, it was the disease of which we have been treating, the malignity of which was increased on extraordinary occasions. A pestilence which, just before the siege of Naples, destroyed one-third of the inhabitants of Cremona, was in all probability the petechial fever[159]. Yet, here and there, the old bubo plague made its appearance. This it was which in the year 1524 carried off 50,000 people in Milan[160], and this appears likewise to have been the disease which, after the sacking of Rome, broke out among the German lansquenets, and in a short time annihilated two-thirds of these troops. Contemporaries saw therein God’s just punishment of their desecration of the Holy See, for in the succeeding years, all the remaining participators in the storming of the eternal city, also met with an end worthy of their crimes[161]. They did not take into account, however, the beastly intemperance and excesses of the soldiery, whose eagerness after plunder led them to encounter the plague poison in the most secret holes and corners; nor did they reflect, that the plague penetrated the Castle of St. Angelo itself, and destroyed some of the courtiers almost under the eyes of the Pope[162]. Of these lansquenets, many went to Naples in the following year under the Prince of Orange, and it may with good ground be supposed, that they took with them to that city fresh germs of plague; to which may be added, the by no means incredible story, that the besieged sent infected and sick soldiers to the French, in order to cause poisonous pestilences to break out among them[163]. This very circumstance tells in favour of bubo plague, for the decided certainty of its contagious nature was known, and seemed beyond all comparison greater than the more conditional communicability of the new disease[164]. Moreover, 233the same attempt at impestation had been already often made in earlier times.

No modern doctor has explained the nature of this violent disease, and historians have only maintained vague outlines that don’t provide enough material for a serious investigation. It is clear that in 1528, a very severe petechial fever spread throughout Italy, and it was so widespread that it even followed Italians abroad, much like the Sweating Sickness followed the English, as shown by the case of the learned Venetian Naugerio, who, while on a mission to Francis the 1st, died in Blois on the Loire from this disease, which the French were not yet familiar with[158]. Contemporaries tell us that this epidemic caused great devastation in a country already torn apart by wars and conflicts, and it’s hardly in doubt that it was the same disease we've been discussing, the severity of which intensifies under extraordinary circumstances. A plague that, just before the siege of Naples, wiped out one-third of Cremona's population, was probably the petechial fever[159]. However, here and there, the old bubo plague showed up. This was the plague that in 1524 killed 50,000 people in Milan[160], and it also seems to have been the disease that broke out among the German lansquenets after the sacking of Rome, quickly decimating two-thirds of these troops. Contemporaries regarded this as God’s punishment for their desecration of the Holy See, as in the following years, all the remaining participants in the attack on the eternal city met ends fitting their crimes[161]. They overlooked, however, the excessive and brutal behavior of the soldiers, whose greed for plunder led them to expose themselves to the plague in the most hidden places; nor did they consider that the plague infiltrated the Castle of St. Angelo itself, killing some courtiers almost in the Pope’s presence[162]. Many of these lansquenets went to Naples the following year under the Prince of Orange, and it’s reasonable to assume they brought fresh plague germs to that city; to which could be added the quite believable story that the besieged sent infected and sick soldiers to the French, hoping to unleash deadly plagues among them[163]. This very situation supports the notion of the bubo plague, since its contagious nature was well known, and appeared significantly more certain than the more conditional communicability of the new disease[164]. Furthermore, 233 there had been numerous similar attempts at spreading disease in earlier times.

It is, however, also to be considered, on the other side, that the French army was more exposed to the epidemic influence of the air, the water, and the general powers of nature, than any other assemblage of men, and, that this influence was probably more powerful in the year 1529, than at any other time during the sixteenth century. The formation of fog in the heat of summer is at all times an extraordinary phenomenon[165], which decidedly indicates a disproportion in the mutual action of the components and powers of the lower strata of the atmosphere. This was not dependent merely on the local peculiarities of Naples, for during the summer of 1528, grey fogs were observed throughout Italy, which rendered the unwholesome quality of the air visible to the eye[166]. This was increased by the prevalence of southerly winds, which are always, in Italy, prejudicial to health, as also by the thousand privations of a camp, so that a disease which was already prevalent all over Italy,—we allude to the petechial fever,—might well break out on the damp soil of Poggio reale. In the history of national diseases, we find a moral proof of the predominance of epidemic influence which plainly and intelligibly manifests itself under the greatest variety of circumstances. This is a belief, that the water, and even the air is poisoned[167]. Nor is this proof wanting in the deplorable history of the French army before Naples, for it was generally believed, that some Spaniards of Moorish descent, to whom was attributed an especial degree of skill in the management of poison, and some Jews from Germany, who, for the sake of gain, had followed the lansquenets to truckle for their booty, had stolen out of the city under cover of the night, in order to poison the water in the neighbourhood of the camp[168]. It was also surmised, that an Italian apothecary had administered to the French knights poison in their medicine[169]. We will not anticipate on this occasion the researches of naturalists, whose experiments on air and water, during important epidemics, have not yet led to any results; it is, however, not improbable that pond and spring water, under such circumstances as are here described 234to have occurred, might become impregnated with a noxious quality not inherent in it, which would very naturally give rise to the belief that a poison had been thrown into it. On the whole, this accusation may certainly be judged according to the same views which have been stated in our treatise on the Black Death.

It should also be noted, however, that the French army was more vulnerable to the epidemic effects of the air, water, and the natural elements than any other group of people, and this influence was likely stronger in 1529 than at any other time during the sixteenth century. The formation of fog in the summer heat is always an unusual phenomenon[165], indicating a mismatch in the interactions of the components and forces in the lower layers of the atmosphere. This was not just due to the specific conditions in Naples, as gray fogs were reported all over Italy during the summer of 1528, making the unhealthy quality of the air visibly apparent[166]. This situation was worsened by the prevalence of southerly winds, which are always harmful to health in Italy, as well as the numerous hardships faced in a camp. As a result, a disease already widespread across Italy—the petechial fever—could easily break out on the damp ground of Poggio Reale. In the records of national diseases, we find clear evidence of the dominance of epidemic influences, which manifest dramatically under various circumstances. There was a widespread belief that the water and even the air were poisoned[167]. This belief was supported by the tragic history of the French army before Naples, as many thought that some Spaniards of Moorish descent, known for their particular skill in handling poison, along with some Jews from Germany who had come for profit, sneaked out of the city at night to poison the water near the camp[168]. It was also suspected that an Italian apothecary had given poison to the French knights in their medicine[169]. We won't preempt the investigations of naturalists, whose studies on air and water during major epidemics have yet to yield results, but it is quite possible that pond and spring water, under the mentioned conditions 234, could become contaminated with a harmful quality not originally present, which would understandably lead to the belief that poison had been added to it. Overall, this accusation can certainly be evaluated based on the same perspectives we've discussed in our examination of the Black Death.

From all these circumstances, the notion is highly probable that it was the petechial fever which raged in the French camp; and if we may attach any importance to the incidental accounts of historians, it may perhaps be to the purpose to state that Prudencio de Sandoval, who has written from authentic materials, calls the disease “las bubas.”[170] This name, it is true, presupposes a rather strange confusion of petechial fever with lues; and, indeed, the diseases among the French troops from 1495 to 1528, have been oddly jumbled together by Sandoval. It shews, however, that there still existed a recollection of the prevalent eruptions which occurred in the pestilence of 1528; and, therefore, this whole account might perhaps be the more justly applied to petechial fever, as this same historian states, that the French called the disease after the village of Poggio reale “les Poches,”[171] by which name the well known bubo plague would hardly have been designated. If, however, we choose to suppose that at one and the same time different diseases prevailed in the French army, this notion is not only supported by the express testimony of a contemporary[172], but also by many observations ancient and modern[173], that have been made in cases where the circumstances have been similar to those which then prevailed. It is ever to be regretted that there was no intelligent Machaon to be found in the camp before Naples; such a one would undoubtedly have left us some pithy observations on the combination and affinity of petechial fever and bubo plague.

Given all these circumstances, it's quite likely that the petechial fever was what spread through the French camp. If we can give any weight to the accounts of historians, it might be relevant to mention that Prudencio de Sandoval, who wrote based on reliable sources, refers to the disease as “las bubas.” This name does suggest an odd confusion between petechial fever and lues; indeed, Sandoval has mixed up the diseases affecting the French troops from 1495 to 1528. However, it shows that there was still some memory of the eruptions that appeared during the 1528 outbreak, which means this whole account might be more accurately related to petechial fever, especially since the same historian notes that the French called the disease after the village of Poggio Reale “les Poches,” a name that would hardly apply to the well-known bubo plague. If we consider the possibility that different diseases were affecting the French army at the same time, this idea is backed not only by the clear statements of a contemporary but also by many observations, both old and modern, in scenarios similar to what was happening then. It’s always unfortunate that there wasn’t an intelligent Machaon in the camp before Naples; a person like that would certainly have given us some insightful observations on the relationship between petechial fever and bubo plague.

235

235

Sect. 2.—Trousse-Galant in France.—1528, and the following years.

Deeply as the irreparable loss of such an army was felt by the French, yet were they destined to suffer still greater misfortunes at home. The dark power which threatened all Europe regarded neither distance nor limits. It seized on the French nation in their own country whilst their military youth were destroyed before Naples. The cold spring and wet summer of 1528 destroyed the growing corn[174], and a famine was thus produced throughout France, even more grievous, on account of its duration, than the period of scarcity in the time of Louis the XIth[175], for the failure of the harvest continued for five years in succession, during which all order of the seasons seemed to have ceased. A damp summer heat prevailed in autumn and winter, a frost of a single day only occasionally intervening. The summer, on the other hand, was cloudy, damp, and ungenial. The length of the days alone distinguished one month from another. It appears plainly from detached accounts how much the usual course of vegetation was disturbed. Scarcely had the fruit trees shed their leaves in the autumn when they began to bud again, and to bear fruitless blossoms. No returns rewarded the toil of the husbandman, and the longed-for harvest again and again deceived the hopes of the people. Thus, even during the first of these calamitous years, the distress became general, and the increasing indigence was no longer to be checked by human aid. Bands of beggars wandered over the country in lamentable procession. The bonds of civil order became more and more relaxed, and people soon had to fear not only robbery and plunder on the part of these unfortunate beings, but the contagion of a pestilence, the offspring of their distress, which followed in their train.

The French felt the deep loss of their army, but they were about to face even worse troubles at home. The dark force that threatened all of Europe paid no attention to distance or boundaries. It struck the French nation right in their own land while their young soldiers were being wiped out in Naples. The cold spring and wet summer of 1528 ruined the growing crops[174], leading to a famine throughout France that was even more severe, due to its length, than the food shortages during the time of Louis XI[175]. The harvest failures lasted for five consecutive years, during which it seemed like the seasons had lost all their normal order. A damp warmth hung over the summer, autumn, and winter, with frost only appearing for a single day now and then. Conversely, the summer was cloudy, wet, and uninviting. The only thing that differentiated one month from another was the length of the days. It's clear from various accounts how much the usual growth of plants was disrupted. Hardly had the fruit trees dropped their leaves in the fall when they started budding again, producing blossoms that bore no fruit. The farmers did not see any rewards for their hard work, and the hoped-for harvest repeatedly let the people down. Thus, even in the first of these disastrous years, the suffering became widespread, and the growing poverty could no longer be eased by any human effort. Groups of beggars wandered through the countryside in a tragic procession. The fabric of civil order continued to unravel, and people began to fear not just theft and violence from these desperate individuals but also the spread of a plague that emerged from their misery, which followed in their wake.

This disease was a new production of the French soil, and when it spread generally throughout the country, was the more sensibly felt, as it especially carried off young and robust men; on which account it was designated by the very significant name of Trousse-Galant[176]. It consisted of a highly inflammatory fever, which destroyed its victims in a very short time, even within the space of a few hours; or, if they escaped with their 236lives, deprived them of their hair and nails, and from a long-continued disinclination for all animal food, left behind it, as sequelæ, a protracted debility and diseases which endangered the recovery of the sick, whose constitutions were already so much shaken. Hence it appears that this fever was combined with a great decomposition of the fluids, and a very morbid condition of the functions of the bowels, not to mention the effects produced by continued hunger, which contemporaries paint in the most dreadful colours.

This disease was a new creation of the French land, and when it spread widely across the country, it was felt even more acutely, especially because it primarily claimed the lives of young and strong men. For this reason, it was given the very telling name of Trousse-Galant[176]. It involved a highly inflammatory fever that quickly killed its victims, sometimes within just a few hours; or, if they survived, it left them without their hair and nails and, due to a long-lasting aversion to all animal food, caused lasting weakness and illnesses that jeopardized the recovery of the patients, whose bodies were already so weakened. Thus, it seems that this fever was linked with significant breakdown of bodily fluids and a severely unhealthy state of digestive functions, not to mention the effects of prolonged hunger, which people of that time described in the most horrific terms.

The stock of provisions was already so far consumed in the first year that people made bread of acorns, and sought with avidity all kinds of harmless roots, merely to appease hunger. These miserable sufferers wandered about, houseless and more like corpses than living beings, and finally, failing even to excite commiseration, perished on dunghills or in out-houses. The larger towns shut their gates against them, and the various charitable institutions proved, of necessity, insufficient to afford relief in this frightful extremity! It was the lot of very few to obtain the tender care and attendance of the Sisters of Charity. In most of those affected their livid swollen countenances, and the dropsical swelling of their limbs, betrayed the sickly condition in which they dragged on their languishing existence. Every one fled from these pestiferous spectres, for they were saturated with the poison of this deadly disease, and the remark was no doubt made a thousand times over, that this poison might be conveyed to persons in health without affecting the carrier, since want and ill health occasionally afford a miserable protection against disease of this kind[177].

The stock of supplies was mostly used up in the first year, so people made bread from acorns and eagerly searched for any kind of safe roots just to satisfy their hunger. These unfortunate individuals wandered around, homeless and more like corpses than living people, and eventually, unable to even get sympathy, they died in garbage or in sheds. The bigger towns closed their gates to them, and the various charities were, necessarily, unable to provide enough help in this terrible crisis! Very few were fortunate enough to receive the care and attention of the Sisters of Charity. For most of those affected, their pale, swollen faces and the swelling of their limbs showed the sickly state in which they dragged on their miserable lives. Everyone avoided these disease-ridden figures, as they were soaked in the poison of this deadly illness, and it was probably said countless times that this poison could be passed on to healthy individuals without affecting the carrier since hunger and poor health sometimes offered a miserable form of protection against this kind of disease[177].

The necessary data for furnishing a complete account of the Trousse-galant of 1528 do not exist, for physicians passed over this epidemic with the same coolness and indifference which unfortunately they may be justly accused of having shewn with respect to other important phenomena. But it returned once again in 1545–46, appearing in Savoy and over a great part of France; and we possess from Paré[178], and from Sander, a Flemish physician[179], though still a defective, yet a more 237satisfactory description of its symptoms on this occasion. Its course was, as before, very rapid, so that it destroyed the patient in two or three days; again it attacked the strong rather than the weak, as if in justification of its old name, and those who recovered remained for a long time distinguishable by the loss of their hair and their wretched appearance. Patients felt at the commencement an insufferable weight in the body, with extremely violent headache, which soon deprived them of all consciousness and passed into a profound stupor, even the sphincter muscles losing their power. In other cases a continued state of sleeplessness was followed by feverish delirium, so violent that it was necessary to have recourse to means of restraint. Such opposite states are usual in all typhous fevers. Sander expressly mentions that in most of those affected, eruptions made their appearance. He does not, however, state their nature or describe the course and crisis of the disease otherwise than that it terminated about the fourth or the eleventh day. Even the eruptions that did appear, which were probably petechiæ, and perhaps also (rother friesel) red miliary vesicles, came at an indefinite period; either at the commencement, when they afforded an unfavourable prognosis, or later, when they betokened a favourable crisis. Thread-worms, in great numbers, were evacuated alive under great torment, and generally increased the sufferings of the patient. The disease was scarcely less contagious than plague, and with respect to its treatment, bleeding, copious and even ad deliquium, was decidedly successful, which coupled with the attacks on the head just described[180], leads to the conclusion that there existed a fulness of blood and an inflammatory state of circulation, together, perhaps, with inflammation of the brain. We must not omit to observe that, during the pestilence of 1546, the bubo plague made its appearance here and there, especially in the Netherlands[181]; and in the following year, broke out and spread to a greater extent in France[182], whence it seems to follow, with respect to the malady of which we are now 238treating, that its nature resembled the petechial fever, since that disease usually precedes the occurrence of pestilences[183].

The complete data needed to provide a thorough account of the Trousse-galant of 1528 isn't available, as doctors approached this epidemic with the same indifference they have unfortunately shown towards other significant phenomena. However, it returned once more in 1545-46, appearing in Savoy and much of France; and we have a somewhat better, though still incomplete, description of its symptoms from Paré[178], and Sander, a Flemish physician[179]. Its progression was, as before, very rapid, often leading to death within two or three days; it targeted the strong rather than the weak, almost affirming its old name, and those who recovered could be easily recognized for a long time due to hair loss and their poor appearance. At the start, patients experienced an unbearable weight in their bodies along with severe headaches, leading quickly to unconsciousness and deep stupor, with even the sphincter muscles losing their function. In other cases, a constant lack of sleep was followed by feverish delirium that was so intense that restraints were often needed. Such contrasting conditions are typical in all typhoid fevers. Sander specifically notes that most affected individuals developed eruptions. However, he does not describe their nature or the disease's course and resolution, only mentioning that it generally ended around the fourth to eleventh day. Even the eruptions that did show up, likely petechiae and possibly (rother friesel) red miliary vesicles, appeared at various times: either early, indicating a poor prognosis, or later, signifying a positive resolution. Alive thread-worms were expelled in large numbers, adding to the patient's suffering. The disease was nearly as contagious as the plague, and for treatment, bleeding—sometimes excessive to the point of collapse—proved to be very effective. This, combined with the head symptoms just mentioned[180], suggests that there was an excess of blood and an inflammatory state in circulation, possibly including brain inflammation. It’s also worth noting that during the plague of 1546, bubonic plague emerged sporadically, especially in the Netherlands[181]; and the following year, it intensified and spread more widely in France[182]. This seems to indicate that the illness we are currently discussing was closely related to petechial fever, as that illness typically precedes outbreaks of plagues[183].

The assertion of historians, that in 1528, and the following years, France lost a fourth part of her inhabitants by famine and pestilence, seems, according to our representation, not to be by any means exaggerated. The consequences, as regarded the future destinies of that country, were likewise very important. For Francis the 1st saw that no new sacrifices could be borne by his people, who were already so sorely afflicted; and therefore abandoned his schemes of greatness and foreign power, consenting, on the 5th of August, 1529, to the disadvantageous treaty of Cambray.

The claim by historians that in 1528 and the following years, France lost a quarter of its population to famine and disease seems, based on our understanding, to be far from an exaggeration. The consequences for the future of that country were also significant. Francis I realized that his people, already suffering so much, could not bear any new sacrifices. As a result, he gave up his ambitions for greatness and foreign power, agreeing to the unfavorable Treaty of Cambrai on August 5, 1529.

Sect. 3.—Sweating Sickness in England, 1528.

Whoever, following the above facts, will represent to himself the state of Europe in 1528, will readily believe, that a poisonous atmosphere enveloped this quarter of the globe, and continually brought destruction and death over its nations. Ruin broke in upon them in a thousand forms, destroying their bodies and benighting their minds, and if to this we add the discord and the deadly party hatred which at that time prevailed in the world, it seems as if every circumstance that could affect mankind was implicated in this gigantic conflict, which threatened in its fatal result to annihilate all traces of the times that were past.

Whoever pictures the state of Europe in 1528 based on the facts above will easily believe that a toxic atmosphere surrounded this part of the world, continually bringing destruction and death to its nations. Ruin came upon them in countless ways, destroying their bodies and darkening their minds. If we also consider the discord and deadly party hatred prevalent at that time, it seems like every circumstance affecting humanity was involved in this massive conflict, which threatened to erase all traces of the past.

A heavier affliction than has yet been described was in store for England: for in the latter end of May, the Sweating Fever broke out there in the midst of the most populous part of the capital, spreading rapidly over the whole kingdom; and fourteen months later, brought a scene of horror upon all the nations of northern Europe, scarcely equalled during any other epidemic. It appeared at once with the same intensity as it had shewn eleven years before, was ushered in by no previous indications, and between health and death there lay but a brief term of five or six hours. Public business was postponed: the courts were closed, and four weeks after the pestilence broke out, the festival of St. John[184] was stopped, to the great sorrow of the people, who certainly would not have dispensed with its celebration 239had they recovered from the consternation arising from the great mortality. The king’s court was again deserted, and to the various passions and mental emotions which had been clashing there since the year 1517, as, for instance, those arising from the theological zeal which had been excited by Henry VIIIth’s defence of the faith, was added once more the old alarm and distress, which seemed to be justified by the death of some favoured courtiers; particularly of two chamberlains[185], and of Sir Francis Poynes, who had just returned from an embassy to Spain. The king left London immediately, and endeavoured to avoid the epidemic by continually travelling, until at last he grew tired of so unsettled a life, and determined to await his destiny at Tytynhangar. Here, with his first wife and a few confidents, he resided quietly, apart from the world, surrounded by fires for the purification of the air, and guarded by the precautions of his physician, who had the satisfaction to find that the pestilence kept aloof from this lonely residence[186].

A more severe plague than anyone had seen before was on its way for England: in late May, the Sweating Fever erupted in the busiest part of the capital, quickly spreading across the entire kingdom; and fourteen months later, it brought a horrifying scene to all the nations of northern Europe, unlike anything experienced in previous outbreaks. It appeared suddenly with the same force it had shown eleven years earlier, with no prior warning, and the time between health and death was a mere five or six hours. Public affairs were put on hold: the courts were shut down, and four weeks after the outbreak began, the festival of St. John[184] was canceled, much to the disappointment of the people, who certainly wouldn’t have missed celebrating it had they not been reeling from the devastation of the high death toll. The king’s court was again abandoned, and to the mix of emotions that had been clashing there since 1517, such as those driven by the theological fervor stirred by Henry VIII’s defense of the faith, was added the return of old fears and distress, particularly justified by the deaths of some favored courtiers; notably, two chamberlains[185], and Sir Francis Poynes, who had just come back from an embassy to Spain. The king left London right away and tried to escape the epidemic by constantly traveling, until he eventually grew weary of such an unstable life and decided to wait out his fate at Tytynhangar. There, with his first wife and a few confidants, he lived quietly, isolated from the world, surrounded by fires to purify the air, and safeguarded by measures from his physician, who was pleased to see that the plague stayed away from this secluded residence[186].

How many lives were lost in this, which some historians have called the great mortality, can be estimated only by the facts which have been stated, and which betoken an uncommonly violent degree of agitation in men’s minds. Accurate data are altogether wanting, yet it is quite evident that the whole English nation, from the monarch to the meanest peasant, was impressed with a feeling of alarm at the uncertainty of life, to which neither the rude state of society, nor a constant familiarity with the effects of laws written in blood[187], had blunted their sensibility. Such a state does not exist without very numerous cases of mortality which bring the danger home to every individual, so that it is to be presumed that the churchyards were everywhere abundantly filled. Nor did this destructive epidemic come alone. Provisions were scarce and dear, and whilst hundreds of thousands lay stretched upon the bed of death, many perished with hunger[188], and the same scenes would 240have been experienced as in France, had not the corn trade afforded some relief[189].

How many lives were lost in what some historians have called the great mortality can only be estimated based on the facts that have been presented, which indicate an unusually intense level of agitation in people's minds. Accurate data is completely lacking, yet it is clear that the entire English nation, from the king to the lowest peasant, felt a deep sense of fear about the uncertainty of life, which neither the rough state of society nor a constant exposure to the harsh realities dictated by brutal laws had dulled. Such a situation does not exist without a significant number of deaths bringing the threat home to everyone, so it's reasonable to assume that churchyards were overflowing. This devastating epidemic didn't come alone. Food was scarce and expensive, and while hundreds of thousands lay dying, many also starved [188], and the same scenes would 240have occurred as in France, if the grain trade hadn't provided some relief [189].

As soon as the occurrences of this unfortunate year could be more closely surveyed, a conviction was at once felt, that it was one and the same general cause of disease which called forth the poisonous pestilence in the French camp before Naples, the putrid fever among the youth in France, and the sweating sickness in England, and that the varying nature of these diseases depended only on the conditions of the soil and the qualities of the atmosphere in the countries which were visited[190]. If, in opposition to these notions, a narrow view of human life in the aggregate should raise a doubt, this would be strikingly refuted by the wonderful coincidence, in point of time, of all these phenomena, occurring in such various parts of Europe; for while the French army, after an exposure of four weeks to the miseries and poisonous vapours of its camp before Naples, perceived the first forebodings of its destruction, the great famine with the Trousse-galant in its train was in full advance on the other side the Alps, and almost on the same day the Sweating Sickness broke out upon the Thames.

As soon as the events of this unfortunate year could be reviewed in more detail, it became clear that there was one main cause of disease responsible for the deadly plague in the French camp before Naples, the toxic fever among the youth in France, and the sweating sickness in England, and that the different forms of these diseases were simply due to the soil conditions and the quality of the atmosphere in the affected countries[190]. If, against these ideas, a limited perspective on human life as a whole raised any doubts, these would be strongly countered by the remarkable coincidence in timing of all these events happening in such diverse parts of Europe; for while the French army, after enduring four weeks of the harsh conditions and toxic fumes of its camp before Naples, started to sense the first signs of its downfall, the significant famine with the Trousse-galant was advancing on the other side of the Alps, and almost simultaneously, the Sweating Sickness erupted along the Thames.

Sect. 4.—Natural Occurrences.—Prognostics.

The chronicles of all the nations of Europe are full of remarkable notices respecting the commotions of nature in these particular years, which were so utterly hostile to the animal and vegetable kingdoms. In England the period of distress was already approaching; towards the end of the year 1527. Throughout the whole winter, (November and December, 1527, and January, 1528,) heavy rains deluged the country, the rivers overflowed their banks, and the winter seed was thus rotted. The weather then remained dry until April; but scarcely was the summer seed sown, when the rain again set in, and continued day and night for full eight weeks, so that the last hope of a harvest was now destroyed[191], and the soaked earth, in the thick mists that arose from its surface, hatched the well known demon of the Sweating 241Disease. It was now of no avail that the torrents of rain ceased, for the softened soil gave the pestilence constant nourishment, and the damp warmth which, alternating with unseasonable cold, remained prevalent during the following years all over Europe, rendered men’s bodies more and more susceptible to severe diseases.

The histories of all the nations in Europe are filled with extraordinary accounts of natural disturbances during these specific years, which were incredibly damaging to both animal and plant life. In England, the time of hardship was just around the corner, toward the end of 1527. Throughout that winter (November and December 1527, and January 1528), heavy rains flooded the country, causing rivers to overflow and ruining the winter crops. The weather stayed dry until April; but as soon as summer crops were planted, the rain returned and continued day and night for a full eight weeks, wiping out any hope for a harvest. The saturated ground, with thick mists rising from its surface, welcomed the infamous demon of the Sweating Disease. Even when the torrential rains finally stopped, the softened soil provided a constant source of sustenance for the plague, and the damp warmth, mixed with unusual cold, persisted throughout the following years across Europe, making people increasingly vulnerable to serious illnesses.

The historians of that time were too much occupied with the intricate affairs of the court and of the church to devote any attention to nature, and on this account they have left us no satisfactory information of the state of the weather and the course of the seasons of those years in England, yet there is no reason to suppose that they were essentially different from those of the rest of Europe. This may be proved by the following collection of important natural occurrences, when taken in conjunction with the circumstances already stated respecting France and Italy.

The historians of that time were too caught up in the complex matters of the court and the church to pay any attention to nature, which is why they didn’t provide us with satisfactory information about the weather and the seasons during those years in England. However, there's no reason to believe they were significantly different from the rest of Europe. This can be shown by the following collection of significant natural events, when considered alongside the details already mentioned about France and Italy.

In Upper Italy such considerable floods occurred in all the river districts, in the year 1527, that the astrologers announced a new Deluge. There was a repetition of them to an equal extent, and with equal damage, in the following year, so that it may have been concluded, not without some ground, that there was an accumulation of snow on the highest mountain ranges of Europe. On the 3rd of July, 1529, there followed a violent earthquake in Upper Italy, and immediately afterwards a blood-rain, as it was called, in Cremona[192].

In Northern Italy, there were significant floods across all river areas in 1527, prompting astrologers to predict a new flood like the Deluge. The same extreme flooding happened again the following year, causing similar damage, leading some to believe there was a buildup of snow on Europe’s highest mountains. On July 3, 1529, a powerful earthquake struck Northern Italy, immediately followed by what was referred to as a blood rain in Cremona[192].

In October, 1530, the Tiber rose so much above its banks that in Rome and its neighbourhood about 12,000 people were drowned. A month later, in the Netherlands, the sea broke through the dykes, and Holland, Zealand, and Brabant suffered very considerably from the overflow of the waters, which again took place two years afterwards[193].

In October 1530, the Tiber rose so high that it overflowed its banks, causing around 12,000 people to drown in Rome and the surrounding areas. A month later, in the Netherlands, the sea broke through the dikes, and Holland, Zealand, and Brabant were significantly affected by the flooding, which happened again two years later[193].

In 1528 there appeared in the March of Brandenburg, during the prevalence of a south-east wind and a great drought[194], (the rains did not commence in Germany before 1529,) swarms of locusts[195], as if this prognostic too of great epidemics was not to be wanting. Of fiery meteors, which also frequently appeared in the following years, and in the aggregate plainly indicated an unusual condition of the atmosphere, much notice, after the 242manner of the times, is occasionally taken[196]. Particular attention was excited by a long fiery train which was seen on the 7th of January, 1529, at seven o’clock in the morning, throughout Mecklenburg and Pomerania[197]. Another fiery sign (chasma) was seen in the March on the 9th of January, at ten o’clock at night[198], as likewise similar atmospherical phenomena in other localities.

In 1528, in the March of Brandenburg, during a southeast wind and a severe drought (the rains didn’t start in Germany until 1529), there were swarms of locusts, which seemed to indicate that more serious epidemics were on the way. There was considerable attention given to fiery meteors that frequently appeared in the following years, clearly showing an unusual state of the atmosphere, as was typical for that time. A long fiery trail was particularly noted on January 7, 1529, at seven o’clock in the morning, seen across Mecklenburg and Pomerania. Another fiery event (chasma) was observed in the March on January 9, at ten o’clock at night, along with similar atmospheric phenomena in other areas.

Comets appeared in the course of this year in unusual number[199]. The first on the 11th of August, 1527, before daybreak; it was seen throughout Europe, and it has often been confounded by more recent writers with an atmospherical phenomenon resembling a comet which appeared on the 11th of October[200]. The second was seen in July and August, 1529, in Germany, France, and Italy. Four other comets are also said to have made their appearance this year at the same time; but it is probable that these were only fiery meteors of an unknown kind[201]. The third was in 1531, and was visible in Europe from the 1st of August till the 3rd of September. This was the great comet of Halley, which returned in the year 1835[202]. The fourth was in 1532, visible from the 2nd of October to the 8th of November; it appeared again in 1661[203]. Lastly, the fifth, in 1533, seen from the middle of June till August[204].

Comets showed up this year in an unusual number[199]. The first one appeared on August 11, 1527, before dawn; it was visible across Europe and has often been confused by more recent writers with an atmospheric phenomenon that looked like a comet, which appeared on October 11[200]. The second was seen in July and August 1529, in Germany, France, and Italy. Four other comets are also said to have appeared this year at the same time, but it’s likely that these were just fiery meteors of some unknown type[201]. The third was in 1531 and was visible in Europe from August 1 to September 3. This was the great comet of Halley, which returned in 1835[202]. The fourth was in 1532, visible from October 2 to November 8; it appeared again in 1661[203]. Lastly, the fifth, in 1533, was seen from mid-June until August[204].

Contemporaries agree remarkably in their accounts of the insufferable state of the weather in the eventful year 1529. The winter was particularly mild, and the vegetation was far too early, so that all the world was rejoicing at the mildness and beauty of the spring. The people wore violets, at Erfurt, on St. Matthew’s day, (the 24th of February,) little expecting 243that this friendly omen was to precede so severe a calamity[205]. Throughout the spring and summer wet weather continued to prevail. Constant torrents of rain overflowed the fields, the rivers passed their banks; all hopes of the cultivation were entirely frustrated[206], and misery and famine spread in all directions. A heavy rain of four days’ continuance, which took place in the south of Germany in the middle of June, and was called the St. Vitus’s Torrent, is still remembered in modern times as an unheard-of event. Whole districts of country were completely laid under water, and many persons perished who had not time to save their lives[207]. A similar, very widely extended, and perhaps universal, storm again occurred on the 10th of August, and occasioned great floods, especially in Thuringia and Saxony[208]. Upon the whole, the sun rarely broke through the heavy dark clouds. The latter part of the summer and the whole of the autumn, with the exception of a series of hot days which commenced the 24th of August[209], remained gloomy, cold, and wet. People fancied they were breathing the foggy air of Britain[210].

Contemporaries unanimously agree on the unbearable weather conditions in the significant year of 1529. The winter was particularly mild, with vegetation blooming too early, leading everyone to celebrate the pleasantness and beauty of spring. People wore violets in Erfurt on St. Matthew’s Day (February 24), not realizing that this cheerful sign would precede such a harsh disaster[205]. Throughout spring and summer, wet weather persisted. Constant downpours flooded the fields, and rivers overflowed; all hopes of cultivation were completely dashed[206], leading to widespread misery and famine. A heavy four-day rain in mid-June in southern Germany, known as the St. Vitus’s Torrent, is still recalled today as an unprecedented occurrence. Entire regions were submerged, and many people died without having time to escape[207]. A similar, widespread, and possibly universal storm struck again on August 10, causing severe flooding, particularly in Thuringia and Saxony[208]. Overall, the sun rarely pierced through the thick dark clouds. The latter part of summer and all of autumn, except for a stretch of hot days starting on August 24[209], remained dreary, cold, and wet. People felt as if they were inhaling the foggy air of Britain[210].

We ought not to omit here to notice that in the north of Germany, and especially in the March of Brandenburg, eating fish, which were caught in great abundance, was generally esteemed detrimental. Malignant and contagious diseases were said to have been traced to this cause, and it was a matter of surprise that the only food which nature bounteously bestowed was so decidedly injurious[211]. It might be difficult now to discover the cause of this phenomenon, of which we possess only isolated notices, yet, passing over all other conjectures, it is quite credible either that an actual fish poison was developed[212], or, if 244this notion be rejected, that a disordered condition of life, such as must be supposed to have existed in a great famine, rendered fish prejudicial to health, in the same way as sometimes occurs after protracted intermittent fevers, when the functions of the bowels are disturbed in a manner peculiar to this disease.

We should not overlook the fact that in northern Germany, especially in the March of Brandenburg, eating fish, which were caught in large quantities, was generally considered harmful. People claimed that serious and contagious diseases could be traced back to this practice, and it was surprising that such a bountiful food source from nature was viewed as so harmful[211]. It might be challenging now to determine the cause of this situation, of which we have only scattered reports, yet, putting aside all other theories, it is quite plausible that either a specific fish poison was present[212], or, if we dismiss this idea, that a troubled state of life, like that which must have occurred during a severe famine, made fish unhealthy, similar to instances following prolonged intermittent fevers when the digestive system is disturbed in a way unique to this illness.

But it was not the inhabitants of the water alone which were affected by hidden causes of excitement in collective organic life; the fowls of the air likewise sickened, who, in their delicate and irritable organs of respiration, feel the injurious influence of the atmosphere much earlier and more sensitively than any of the unfeathered tribes, and have often been the harbingers of great danger, ere man was aware of its approach. In the neighbourhood of Freyburg in the Breisgau, dead birds were found scattered under the trees, with boils as large as peas under their wings, which indicated among them a disease, that in all probability extended far beyond the southern districts of the Rhine[213].

But it wasn't just the creatures in the water that were affected by the hidden causes of excitement in collective organic life; the birds in the air also fell ill. Their delicate and sensitive respiratory systems react to harmful changes in the atmosphere much sooner and more acutely than those of featherless creatures, often serving as early warning signs of serious danger before humans are even aware of it. In the area around Freyburg in the Breisgau, dead birds were found scattered beneath the trees, with swellings the size of peas under their wings, indicating a disease that likely spread far beyond the southern regions of the Rhine[213].

The famine in Germany, during this year, is described by respectable authorities in a tone of deep sympathy. Swabia, Lorraine, Alsace, and the other southern countries bordering on the Rhine, were especially visited, so that misery there reached the same frightful height as in France. The poor emigrated and roved over the country, solely to prolong their wretched existence. Above a thousand of these half-starved mendicants came to Strasburg out of Swabia. They obtained shelter in a monastery, and attempts were made to revive them, yet many were unable to bear the food that was placed before them. Attention and nourishment did but hasten their death. Another body of more than eight hundred came in the autumn from Lorraine. These unfortunate people were kept in the city, and fed during the whole winter[214], yet it is easy to conceive that this benevolence, which was no doubt likewise exercised in other cities[215]—for when was humanity ever found wanting in Germany?—could only occasionally alleviate this deeply rooted calamity. In the Venetian territories, many hundreds are said to have perished with hunger, and a like distress probably prevailed all over Upper Italy.

The famine in Germany this year is described by reputable authorities with deep sympathy. Swabia, Lorraine, Alsace, and other southern regions near the Rhine faced extreme suffering, reaching the same horrifying level as in France. Many poor souls emigrated and wandered around just to extend their miserable lives. Over a thousand of these starving beggars arrived in Strasbourg from Swabia. They found shelter in a monastery, but efforts to restore their health were futile, as many couldn't handle the food given to them. Care and nutrition only seemed to speed up their death. Another group of more than eight hundred arrived in the autumn from Lorraine. These unfortunate individuals were housed in the city and fed throughout the winter[214], but it's easy to understand that this kindness, which was likely shown in other cities[215]—for when has humanity ever been lacking in Germany?—could only sometimes ease this deeply entrenched crisis. In the Venetian territories, it's reported that many hundreds perished from hunger, and similar suffering likely spread throughout Upper Italy.

In the north of Germany, including the extensive sandy 245plains, on which wet weather is not so injurious in its effect as on a heavy clayey soil, the state of the country was upon the whole more tolerable[216]; yet, independently of the innumerable evils to which a scarcity gives rise, suicide was more frequent[217], which was certainly a rarity in the sixteenth century, and only explicable by supposing, that the powers of the mind became exhausted by the many and various passions, which in every individual locality, excited a spirit of hatred and party feeling. The consequence of such a state of turmoil is a cold disgust of life, which finds, in the first adverse event that may occur, a pretext for self-destruction, that want alone would seldom if ever occasion: for man, if his spirit be unbroken, runs the chance of starvation in times of famine, and trusts to the faintest gleam of hope, rather than, of his own accord, abandon the enjoyment of life.

In northern Germany, including the vast sandy 245plains, where wet weather doesn't have as harmful an impact as on heavy clay soil, the overall condition of the country was somewhat better[216]; however, aside from the countless problems that arise from scarcity, suicide was more common[217], which was definitely rare in the sixteenth century. This could only be explained by the idea that people's minds became drained by the numerous and varied passions that stirred up hatred and division in each local area. The result of such chaos is a deep disillusionment with life, which finds justification for self-destruction in the first negative event that occurs—something that lack alone would rarely cause: for a person, if their spirit remains unbroken, faces the risk of starvation during famines and holds on to even the faintest glimmer of hope rather than willingly give up the joy of living.

It is no less in point here to notice a kind of faint lassitude, which, to the great astonishment of the people, was felt, especially in Pomerania, in June and July[218], up to the very period when the Sweating Sickness broke out. In the midst of their work, and without any conceivable cause, people became palsied in their hands and feet, so that even if their lives had depended upon it, they were incapable of the slightest exertion[219]. The treatment which was found successful, was to cover the patients warmly, and to supply them with nourishing food, of which they ate plentifully, and thus recovered again, in three or four days. Phenomena of this kind, which in the present instance evidently depended on atmospherical influence, are but the extreme gradations of a generally morbid dullness of vital feeling, which might easily pass into an actual disgust of life, such as would lead to suicide.

It’s important to note a kind of faint tiredness that, to the great surprise of everyone, was felt especially in Pomerania during June and July[218], right up to the time when the Sweating Sickness began. In the middle of their work, and for no clear reason, people experienced paralysis in their hands and feet, so that even if their lives depended on it, they couldn't muster the slightest effort[219]. The treatment that worked was to keep the patients warm and provide them with nourishing food, which they consumed in large quantities, allowing them to recover in three or four days. These kinds of phenomena, which in this case clearly resulted from atmospheric factors, are merely extreme variations of a generally low sense of well-being, which could easily shift into actual despair, potentially leading to suicide.

The following years were by no means all marked by a complete failure in produce. The year 1530 was, on the contrary, plentiful, there being only some partial failures, as, for example, that which arose from a great flood in the district of the Saal, 246which occurred in the midst of the harvest time[220]. A very cold spring and a wet cold summer followed in 1531, with only occasional fine days; yet the ground was not altogether unproductive, and the great distress which would otherwise have been felt in Thuringia and Saxony, was checked by the establishment of granaries, so that the people were not obliged, as they often were in Swabia, to mow the green corn that they might dry the ears in ovens, and support life upon the yet unripe grain.

The years that followed were not completely marked by failure in production. The year 1530, on the contrary, was abundant, with only a few partial failures, such as a significant flood in the Saal region, 246 which happened right in the middle of harvest time[220]. A very cold spring and a wet, chilly summer followed in 1531, with only a few nice days; however, the land was not entirely unproductive, and the severe hardship that could have been felt in Thuringia and Saxony was alleviated by the creation of granaries. This meant the people didn’t have to do what they often did in Swabia, which was to cut the green corn to dry the ears in ovens and survive on the still-immature grain.

The years 1532 and 1533, were again very sterile, as also 1534, in consequence of the great heat and dryness of the summer. Finally, in the year 1535, the regular change of the seasons, and with it a prosperous state of cultivation, seemed to be restored, and the scarcity ceased[221]. The reports from different localities in Germany vary much, but the scarcity prevailed for full seven years[222], (from 1528 to 1534,) and since its causes were not discoverable, because it was only seen by each observer in his own narrow circle, the old German adage was often called to mind: “If there is to be a scarcity, it is of no avail even should all the mountains be made of flour.”[223]

The years 1532 and 1533 were also very barren, as was 1534, due to the intense heat and dryness of the summer. Finally, in 1535, the usual change of seasons, along with a fruitful state of farming, seemed to return, and the scarcity ended[221]. Reports from different regions in Germany varied greatly, but the shortage lasted a full seven years[222], (from 1528 to 1534), and since its causes weren't identifiable, as it was only evident to each observer within their limited view, the old German saying was often recalled: “If there's going to be a scarcity, it doesn't help even if all the mountains are made of flour.”[223]

Sect. 5.—Sweating Sickness in Germany, 1529.

These facts are sufficient for a preliminary sketch of the background on which moved the spectre of England, to which we now return. How long the sweating sickness may have raged there after Henry the VIIIth quitted his secluded place of refuge in order to return to his capital, no one has left any written account to show. That it spread very rapidly over the whole kingdom is decidedly to be presumed, and might probably still be easily ascertainable from the written records of different places. The notion that it did not rage violently in any town more than a few weeks, is justified by corresponding phenomena of more recent occurrence, yet no doubt it continued to exist among the people, though in a mitigated degree, till the mild winter season. But there are not even the slightest data 247by which it can be made out that it was still in England during the summer of 1529. As an epidemic it certainly existed no longer, yet on a consideration of the state of the air in that year, it is not to be denied that isolated cases of Sweating Fever may have appeared; for in pestilences of this kind, provided their original causes continue, there always occur some straggling cases[224]. The Sweating Sickness did not advance westward to Ireland, nor did it pass the Scottish border; the historians, who would certainly have recorded so calamitous an event, are entirely silent respecting such an occurrence. The tragedy was, however, destined to be enacted elsewhere; other nations were to play their part in it.

These facts are enough for a basic overview of the background involving the specter of England, which we will revisit. No one has documented how long the sweating sickness continued to spread after Henry VIII left his secluded refuge to return to his capital. It's certainly presumed to have spread rapidly across the kingdom and could likely still be traced through written records from various locations. The idea that it didn't hit any town too hard for more than a few weeks is supported by similar recent events. Still, it likely persisted among the population, albeit to a lesser extent, until the mild winter season. However, there is no evidence 247 to confirm that it was still in England during the summer of 1529. As an epidemic, it certainly didn't exist anymore, but given the atmospheric conditions that year, it wouldn't be surprising if isolated cases of Sweating Fever appeared; in epidemics like this, as long as the original causes persist, there are always a few lingering cases[224]. The Sweating Sickness didn’t spread west to Ireland nor did it cross into Scotland; historians, who would have certainly noted such a disastrous event, remain completely silent on the matter. However, the tragedy was destined to unfold elsewhere; other nations were to take their turn in it.

Hamburgh was the first place on the continent in which the Sweating Sickness broke out. Men’s minds were still in great excitement there in consequence of the events of the few preceding months. The Protestants had, after long and stormy contests, at length vanquished the Papists. Under the wise direction of Bugenhagen the great work of Reformation was just completed. The monasteries were abolished, the monks dismissed, schools were established, and peace again returned with the enjoyment of ecclesiastical freedom. Just at this moment[225] the dreaded pestilence, of which wonderful accounts had been so long and so often heard, unexpectedly made its appearance. It immediately excited, as it had ever done in England, general dismay, and before any instructions as to its treatment could be obtained, either from the English or from Germans who had been in England, it destroyed daily from forty to sixty, and altogether, within the space of twenty-two days[226], about 1100 inhabitants, for such was the number of coffins which were at this time manufactured by the undertakers. The duration of the great mortality, for thus we would designate the more violent raging of this pestilence, was, however, much shorter, and may be roughly estimated at about 248nine days, for from the fragment of a letter received from Hamburgh, which was dispatched to Wittenberg on the 8th of August, by a person who was at that time burgomaster, it appears that, for some days past, no one had died of the Sweating Fever, excepting one or two drunkards, and that the citizens were then beginning to take breath again. We may thus judge, from the unauthenticated account here mentioned, that the disease lasted about a fortnight longer, and that the loss of lives amounted to 2000. At all events, however, the pestilence manifested itself on the continent with the same malignity which was peculiar to it from the first, and if the assertion made at a distance respecting the mortality in Hamburgh, were overcharged[227], yet there certainly existed sufficient foundation for exaggerations of this sort, which are never wanting in times of such great danger. The historians of this, even at that time, powerful and civilized commercial town, have on the whole said but little regarding this important event—a circumstance easily explicable from the constant occupation of men’s minds in religious affairs, and from the well known short visitation of the epidemic, which, like a transient meteor, needed quick and cautious observation if any valuable information respecting the occurrence was to be transmitted to posterity. Some particulars of its first origin have, however, been preserved amid a mass of general assertions which convey no information. Thus it appears that the Sweating Sickness did not show itself in the town until a Captain Hermann Evers, just about the time mentioned, (the 25th of July,) returned from England, bringing on board with him a number of young people, (probably travellers as well as sailors,) of whom at least twelve died of this disease within two days[228]. 249According to another account, those who died were not taken ill in England, but on the voyage, and the pestilence broke out after the rest of the crew had disembarked. On this point we have further a most respectable testimony to the fact, that in the night after the landing of Hermann Evers, four men died in Hamburgh of the Sweating Sickness[229].

Hamburg was the first place on the continent where the Sweating Sickness broke out. People were still very agitated there because of the events of the past few months. The Protestants had, after long and fierce battles, finally defeated the Papists. Under the wise guidance of Bugenhagen, the great work of Reformation was just finished. The monasteries were dissolved, the monks sent away, schools were set up, and peace returned along with the enjoyment of religious freedom. Just at this moment[225] the dreaded disease, which had been talked about for so long, unexpectedly appeared. It immediately caused, as it had always done in England, widespread panic, and before any advice on how to treat it could be obtained from the English or from Germans who had been in England, it killed daily between forty and sixty people, totaling about 1100 inhabitants within just twenty-two days[226], as indicated by the number of coffins made by the undertakers at that time. The duration of the great mortality, as we would call the more intense outbreak of this disease, was much shorter, roughly estimated to be about 248nine days. From a fragment of a letter received from Hamburg, which was sent to Wittenberg on August 8th by someone who was the mayor at that time, it appears that for some days prior, no one had died from the Sweating Fever except for one or two drunkards, and that the citizens were beginning to catch their breath again. We can therefore conclude from this unverified account that the disease lasted about a fortnight longer and that the death toll reached 2000. In any case, the disease showed itself on the continent with the same severity that was characteristic of it from the beginning, and while reports about the death toll in Hamburg might have been exaggerated[227], there was certainly enough reason for such exaggerations, which are common in times of great danger. Historians from this powerful and civilized trading town have generally said little about this significant event—a fact easily explained by people's constant focus on religious matters, and the well-known short duration of the epidemic, which, like a fleeting meteor, needed quick and careful observation if any valuable information about the event was to be passed on to future generations. Some details about its initial outbreak have, however, been preserved amidst a multitude of general claims that provide no real information. It seems that the Sweating Sickness did not appear in the town until Captain Hermann Evers, around the mentioned time (July 25th), returned from England, bringing with him a number of young people (likely travelers and sailors), of whom at least twelve died from this disease within two days[228]. 249 According to another account, those who died weren't taken ill in England but on the voyage, and the disease broke out after the rest of the crew had disembarked. We have credible testimony that after Hermann Evers landed, four men died in Hamburg from the Sweating Sickness[229].

If we examine a little more closely these very valuable accounts, the credibility of which there is no reason to doubt, it must especially be taken into account, that at this time the Sweating Sickness had ceased to exist as an epidemic in England for at least half a year, that its appearance in single cases, although not contradictory to general views, is nevertheless by no means borne out by proof from historical evidence, and that thus it is a gratuitous and unsupported assumption that the return of Hermann Evers’ crew was connected with any Sweating Sickness at all in England. If we consider, on the other hand, that the North Sea, even in ordinary years, is very foggy, so that, owing to the prevalence of north-west winds, it precipitates very heavy rain clouds over Germany; and if we bear in mind, that in the year 1529 it produced far heavier fogs than usual, we shall perceive in its waters the principal cause why the English Sweating Sickness was then developed in its greatest violence, and we may thence assume, with a greater degree of probability, that this pestilence broke out among the crew of Hermann Evers spontaneously, and without any connexion with England, in the same way, perhaps, as it did formerly on board Henry the VIIth’s fleet. This supposition is strengthened by the circumstance that the ships of those times were excessively filthy, and the kind of life spent on board them was, independently of the wretched provision, uncomfortable in the highest degree, nay, almost insupportable, so that even in short voyages, the scurvy, which was the dread of sailors in those days, was of very common occurrence. Finally, we still possess the most distinct accounts, that unusual occurrences took place in the North Seas. Thus during Lent it was observed with 250astonishment at Stettin, that porpoises came in numbers up the frische Haff as far as the bridge, and that the Baltic cast on its shores many dead animals of this kind[230], so that we are fully justified in concluding that there existed at that time a more intense development than usual of morbific influences in the marine atmosphere.

If we take a closer look at these highly valuable accounts, whose credibility we have no reason to doubt, we must especially remember that by this time, the Sweating Sickness had not been an epidemic in England for at least six months. Although single cases did appear, this does not contradict general views, but we lack historical proof to support the idea that the return of Hermann Evers’ crew was linked to any Sweating Sickness in England. On the other hand, if we consider that the North Sea, even in typical years, is very foggy and that due to prevailing north-west winds, it generates heavy rain clouds over Germany, and if we keep in mind that in 1529 it produced even heavier fogs than usual, we can see that the waters there likely caused the English Sweating Sickness to develop in its most severe form. It’s reasonable to assume that this outbreak occurred among Hermann Evers’ crew spontaneously, without any connection to England, possibly similar to what happened on Henry VII’s fleet in the past. This theory is supported by the fact that ships of that time were extremely filthy, and life on board was not just uncomfortable due to bad provisions but almost unbearable. Consequently, even on short voyages, scurvy, which sailors dreaded back then, was quite common. Finally, we still have clear accounts indicating that unusual events occurred in the North Seas. For example, during Lent, it was noted with astonishment in Stettin that porpoises came up the frische Haff in large numbers as far as the bridge, and the Baltic washed ashore many dead animals of this kind, so we are justified in concluding that there was a stronger than usual development of harmful influences in the marine atmosphere at that time.

With respect, however, to the influence which the companions of Hermann Evers, impregnated as they were with the odour of the Sweating Sickness, had on the inhabitants of Hamburgh, it cannot be denied, that their intercourse with those inhabitants, in the filthy and narrow lanes of that commercial city, may have given an impulse to the eruption of the pestilence, so far as to make the already existing fuel more inflammable, or to furnish the first sparks for its ignition: yet it is equally undeniable that, under the existing circumstances, the epidemic Sweating Sickness would have broken out in Germany even without the presence of Captain Evers, although it might, perhaps, have been some weeks later, and not have made its first appearance in Hamburgh, whose inhabitants, owing to the constant prevalence of the North Sea fog, were, to all appearance, already prepared for the first reception of this fatal disease.

However, regarding the influence that Hermann Evers's companions, who carried the odor of the Sweating Sickness, had on the people of Hamburg, it's undeniable that their interactions with those residents in the filthy and narrow streets of that commercial city may have triggered the outbreak of the plague, making the already combustible conditions even more volatile or providing the initial sparks for it to ignite. Yet, it's also true that given the circumstances, the epidemic Sweating Sickness would have still emerged in Germany even without Captain Evers being there, though it might have happened a few weeks later and not have first appeared in Hamburg, where the residents, due to the constant presence of North Sea fog, seemed already prepared for the arrival of this deadly disease.

To determine to a day when epidemics which have been long in preparation have broken out, is, even for an observer who is present, exceedingly difficult, nay, sometimes, under the most favourable circumstances, impossible; for there occur in these visitations, certain transitions into the epidemic form, of diseases which are allied to it, as well as a gradual conversion into it of morbid phenomena, which have usually begun some time before. Unless we are greatly mistaken, such was the case in the pestilence of which we are now treating; although it must be confessed, that we can obtain no precise information on this point from the physicians of those times. The following statements, for the absolute precision of which we cannot pledge ourselves after a lapse of 300 years, must therefore be judged according to this general experience; and though singly they may prove little, yet taken altogether, they are capable of demonstrating the peculiar and almost wonderful manner in which the Sweating Fever spread over Germany.

Determining the exact day when long-prepared epidemics break out is extremely difficult, even for someone who is there to witness it. Sometimes, under the best circumstances, it's impossible; these outbreaks involve certain shifts into the epidemic form from related diseases, as well as a gradual transition of unhealthy phenomena that often started some time earlier. If we’re not mistaken, this was the case with the plague we are discussing; although we must admit that we can't get precise information on this from the doctors of that time. Therefore, the following statements, which we can't guarantee for accuracy after 300 years, should be evaluated based on this general experience. While each statement may seem insignificant on its own, together they can illustrate the unique and almost remarkable way the Sweating Fever spread across Germany.

In Lübeck, the next city in the Baltic, the Sweating Sickness 251appeared about the same time; for so early as the Friday before St. Peter in vinculis (30th of July), it was known, that on the preceding night a woman had died of it[231]. On the following days cases of death fearfully increased, and the disorder soon raged so violently, that people were again reminded of the Black Death of 1349. The inhabitants died without number, as well in the city as in the environs, and the consternation was equal to that felt in Hamburgh[232]. In general, as was everywhere the case, robust young people of the better classes were affected, while, on the other hand, children and poor people living in cellars and garrets almost all of them escaped[233].

In Lübeck, the next city along the Baltic, the Sweating Sickness 251 appeared around the same time; as early as the Friday before St. Peter in vinculis (30th of July), it was reported that a woman had died from it[231]. In the days that followed, the number of deaths skyrocketed, and the illness spread so violently that people were once again reminded of the Black Death of 1349. Countless inhabitants perished, both in the city and the surrounding areas, and the panic was just as severe as that experienced in Hamburg[232]. Generally, as was seen everywhere else, strong young individuals from the upper classes were most affected, while children and poor people living in basements and attics mostly escaped[233].

Now one might, either on the supposition of a progressive alteration in the atmosphere, such as occurs in the influenza, or on that of a communication of the disease from man to man, which, however, cannot be considered as a principal cause of this epidemic, have expected a gradual extension of the Sweating Sickness from Hamburgh and Lübeck to the surrounding country. This did not, however, in fact, take place; for the disease next broke out at Twickau, at the foot of the Erzgebirge, distant from Hamburgh fifty German miles, and without having previously visited the rich commercial city of Leipzig. By the 14th of August, nineteen persons who had died of it, were buried at Twickau; and on one of the following nights above a hundred[234] sickened, whence it is to be deduced that the pestilence was severe at that place.

Now, one might think that either due to a change in the atmosphere, like what happens during the flu, or because the disease spreads from person to person, which can't really be seen as the main cause of this epidemic, it would gradually spread the Sweating Sickness from Hamburg and Lübeck to the surrounding areas. However, that didn't actually happen; instead, the disease broke out next in Zwickau, at the foot of the Erzgebirge, which is fifty German miles away from Hamburg, without first affecting the wealthy trading city of Leipzig. By August 14th, nineteen people who had died from it were buried in Zwickau; and on one of the following nights, over a hundred people became ill, indicating that the sickness was serious in that location.

Possibly the great storm on the 10th of August may have given an impulse to the development of this very remarkable epidemic; for an highly electrical state of the atmosphere increases the susceptibility for diseases. It is likewise not to be overlooked, that on the 24th of August, while the sky was overcast, there came on an insufferable heat[235], which must have debilitated the body after such long-continued cold wet weather. At all events, in the beginning of September, we find that the Sweating Fever broke out at the same time at Stettin, Dantzig, and other Prussian cities; at Augsburg, far to the south on the 252other side of the Danube, at Cologne on the Rhine, at Strasbourg, at Frankfort on the Maine, at Marburg[236], at Göttingen, and at Hanover[237]. The position of these cities gives an impressive notion of the extent of country of which the English Sweating Sickness took possession, as it were by a magic stroke. It was like a violent conflagration, which spread in all directions; the flames, however, did not issue from one focus, but rose up everywhere, as if self-ignited; and whilst all this occurred in Germany and Prussia, the inhabitants of the other northern countries, Denmark, Norway and Sweden, perhaps also Lithuania, Poland and Russia, were likewise visited by this violent disease.

It's possible that the massive storm on August 10th sparked the emergence of this very unusual epidemic, as a highly charged atmosphere makes people more susceptible to illness. It's also important to note that on August 24th, during an overcast sky, there was an unbearable heat wave[235], which likely weakened the body after a long period of cold, wet weather. In any case, by early September, we see that the Sweating Fever broke out simultaneously in Stettin, Dantzig, and other Prussian cities; in Augsburg, far to the south on the 252other side of the Danube, in Cologne on the Rhine, in Strasbourg, in Frankfort on the Maine, in Marburg[236], in Göttingen, and in Hanover[237]. The locations of these cities illustrate the vast area that the English Sweating Sickness invaded, as if by some magical force. It spread like a fierce wildfire, igniting in all directions; the flames didn’t originate from a single source but flared up everywhere, as if spontaneously ignited. Meanwhile, as all this unfolded in Germany and Prussia, people in other northern countries—Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and possibly Lithuania, Poland, and Russia—were also affected by this severe disease.

The malady appeared in Stettin on the 31st of August, among the servants of the Duke[238]. On the 1st of September, the Duchess herself sickened, in common with many people about the court, and burgesses in the city. A few days afterwards several thousands were affected by the disease, so that there was not a street from which some corpses were not daily carried out. This dreadful period of terror, however, did not last much longer than a week, for about the 8th of September the pestilence abated in its violence, so as no longer to be regarded with terror; and after this time only a few isolated cases occurred[239].

The illness showed up in Stettin on August 31st, affecting the servants of the Duke[238]. By September 1st, the Duchess fell ill, along with many people at the court and residents of the city. A few days later, thousands were impacted by the disease, with corpses being carried out from every street daily. However, this terrible period of fear didn’t last much longer than a week, as the outbreak started to lessen around September 8th, no longer causing panic; after that, only a few isolated cases were reported[239].

On the same day, namely, the 1st of September, the disease appeared in Dantzig, fifty German miles further to the eastward, and was here also so destructive, that it carried off in a short time 3000 inhabitants[240], some say even 6000—but this seems certainly too high an estimate for Dantzig, and probably includes the greater part of Prussia. If we were to give credence to an anonymous reporter[241], this plague abated in five days, and relieved the inhabitants from the mortal anxiety which, until they recovered their senses, led them everywhere to commit acts of injustice and injury to avert the danger.

On the same day, September 1st, the disease showed up in Dantzig, fifty German miles further east, and it was just as deadly here, taking away around 3,000 residents—some say even 6,000—but that seems way too high for Dantzig and probably includes most of Prussia. If we trust an anonymous reporter, this plague eased up in five days, freeing the residents from the intense fear that led them to act unjustly and harmfully in an effort to avoid the threat.

In Augsburg we find the Sweating Sickness on the 6th of September. It lasted there also only six days, affected about 2531500 of the inhabitants, and destroyed more than half that number, or, as it is said, about 800[242].

In Augsburg, the Sweating Sickness appeared on September 6th. It lasted there for only six days, impacted around 2531500 residents, and killed more than half of them, or, as it's reported, about 800[242].

At Cologne it appeared precisely at the same time, as we learn from the expressions of the Count von Newenar, a prelate of that place, who finished his account of this disorder on the 7th of September[243]. At Strasburg it broke out some ten or twelve days earlier, namely, on the 24th of August. In this place about 3000 people sickened in one week, but very few of them died[244]. At Frankfort on the Maine they were holding the autumn fair (which began on the 7th of September) just at the time when the Sweating Sickness prevailed[245], whence arose the opinion, which has been broached again in more modern times[246], that the traders on their return carried the disease thence throughout the whole of Germany, and that in the intercourse by means of this fair, the main cause of the spread of the epidemic was to be found. After the facts which have been brought forward, such a narrow view needs no refutation. The Sweating Sickness was fleeter than the conveyances of goods and people, which at that time made their way along the pathless and unbeaten roads; for “no sooner did a rumour of the approach of the disease reach anyplace than the disease itself accompanied it.”[247]

At Cologne, it showed up at the exact same time, as noted by Count von Newenar, a local church leader, who wrapped up his account of this outbreak on September 7[243]. In Strasburg, it started about ten or twelve days earlier, specifically on August 24. In that city, around 3,000 people fell ill in just one week, but very few of them died[244]. In Frankfort on the Main, they were having their autumn fair (which started on September 7) right when the Sweating Sickness was spreading[245], leading to the belief, which has resurfaced in more recent times[246], that traders returning from the fair spread the disease throughout Germany, and that this fair was the primary cause of the epidemic's spread. Given the evidence presented, such a limited perspective doesn't need any defense. The Sweating Sickness was more rapid than the transportation of goods and people, which at that time traveled along rugged and unmarked roads; for “as soon as a rumor of the disease's approach reached any place, the disease itself was right behind it.”[247]

Between the boundaries which have been indicated, only a few isolated towns and villages escaped, and there are probably few of the chronicles of that age, so prolific of great events, in which the dreadful scourge of the year 1529 is not expressly mentioned; yet the sweating fever, like other great epidemics, spread, doubtless, very unequally, and it is ascertained that the further south it extended, the milder it was upon the whole; and also that all those places where it broke out late suffered beyond comparison less than those which were visited early in September and in the latter part of August; for not to lay much stress on the sultry heat from the 24th of August, which probably did not last long, the chief cause of its great malignity at first was the violent method resorted to in the treatment of the sick, the inapplicability of which was fortunately soon perceived. Only one citizen was affected with the Sweating Sickness 254in Marburg, and even he recovered[248], whilst at Leipzig, the pestilence either never broke out at all, or very much later, perhaps in October or November; for the physicians of that place gave it clearly to be understood in their pamphlets, that they knew nothing of the disease from their own observations[249], and no sooner did the report get abroad that the dreaded enemy had not penetrated within the walls of this commercial city, than crowds of fugitives came thither from far and near in order to seek protection and security, although the place in itself was by no means fitted for a place of refuge, for the swampy atmosphere which rose from the city ditches begot, even in those days, in the narrow and dark streets, many lingering diseases[250].

Between the boundaries mentioned, only a few isolated towns and villages escaped, and there are probably few chronicles from that time, so filled with significant events, in which the terrible epidemic of 1529 isn't specifically noted; however, the sweating fever, like other major epidemics, clearly spread very unevenly, and it's been determined that the further south it spread, the milder it generally was; also, all places where it broke out later suffered significantly less than those hit early in September and late in August; for, not to emphasize too much the sultry heat from August 24, which likely didn't last long, the main reason for its severe impact initially was the aggressive treatment methods used on the sick, the flaws of which were fortunately noticed soon enough. Only one citizen was affected by the Sweating Sickness 254 in Marburg, and he recovered[248], while in Leipzig, the plague either never broke out at all or occurred much later, perhaps in October or November; for the doctors there clearly stated in their pamphlets that they had no firsthand knowledge of the disease[249], and as soon as word spread that the feared enemy had not entered the walls of this trading city, crowds of refugees came from near and far seeking safety and protection, even though the city itself was hardly suited as a refuge, as the swampy air from the city ditches caused, even back then, many lingering illnesses in the narrow and dark streets[250].

Sect. 6.—In the Netherlands.

It is remarkable that the Netherlands were visited by the Sweating Fever[251] full four weeks later, although the commercial intercourse with England, if we were to attach any especial importance to this circumstance, was far more considerable than that of the German cities in the North Sea. It appeared for the first time in Amsterdam on the 27th of September in the forenoon, whilst the city was enveloped in a thick fog[252], and just at the same time, perhaps a day earlier, in Antwerp, where, on the 29th of September, they made a solemn procession in order by prayer to avert greater harm from the city; for in the last days of September 400 to 500 people died of the English Sweating Sickness at that place[253]. It might have been supposed that the damp soil of Holland, and its impenetrable fogs, would invite the pestilence much earlier than the high and serene country between the Alps and the Danube, or the far distant land of Prussia, but the development of epidemics follows no human calculation or medical views! In the towns around Amsterdam the Sweating Fever appears not to have broken out until the 255mortality had ceased in that city, that is to say, five days after the 27th of September, so that we cannot be far wrong in assuming that in the latter end of that month, and the commencement of October, it had spread over the whole territory of the Netherlands including Belgium[254]. Alkmaar and Waterland remained free[255], as doubtless had been the case with particular places both in England and Germany.

It’s striking that the Netherlands were hit by the Sweating Fever a full four weeks later, even though their trade with England was much greater than that of the German cities along the North Sea. It first appeared in Amsterdam on the morning of September 27th, while the city was shrouded in thick fog, and around the same time, possibly a day earlier, in Antwerp, where they held a solemn procession on September 29th to pray for protection against greater harm, as 400 to 500 people died from the English Sweating Sickness there in the last days of September. One might think that the damp soil of Holland and its dense fogs would allow the disease to strike much sooner than in the high and clear regions between the Alps and the Danube, or the faraway land of Prussia, but the spread of epidemics defies all human predictions and medical theories! In the towns surrounding Amsterdam, the Sweating Fever seems not to have broken out until after the death toll in that city had declined, specifically five days after September 27th. This suggests that by the end of September and the start of October, it likely spread throughout the entire Netherlands, including Belgium. Alkmaar and Waterland remained unaffected, as did some specific locations in both England and Germany.

The exceedingly short time that the Sweating Sickness lasted in the different places that it visited, was as astonishing as its original appearance. For since it raged in Amsterdam for only five days, and not much longer, as we have shewn, in Antwerp and many German towns, it could hardly have continued more than fifteen days in any other places; thus displaying the same peculiarity on this occasion by which it had already been marked in its former visitations. This short period, however, must not be understood to include the sporadic occurrence of the disease, otherwise, as a contemporary of credit assures us, that the sweating fever attacked some persons twice and others three or even four times[256], we might thence conclude, that, although perhaps in some places the pestilence did, after raging for a certain number of days, suddenly cease, so that no isolated cases afterwards occurred, yet that the general duration of its prevalence was longer than has been stated.

The incredibly brief time that the Sweating Sickness lasted in the different places it reached was as surprising as its sudden appearance. Since it only lasted five days in Amsterdam and not much longer, as we've shown, in Antwerp and many German towns, it likely couldn't have gone on for more than fifteen days anywhere else; this shows the same pattern it had in previous outbreaks. However, this short duration shouldn't be taken to mean that sporadic cases of the disease didn't happen; otherwise, as a trustworthy contemporary tells us, some individuals were struck by the sweating fever two, three, or even four times[256]. We might conclude that although the sickness might have suddenly stopped after a certain number of days in some places, with no further isolated cases afterward, the overall duration of its occurrence was longer than what has been noted.

Sect. 7.—Denmark, Sweden, and Norway.

The eruption of the Sweating Fever in Denmark[257], took place at the latter end of September, for on the 29th of that month, four hundred of the inhabitants died of it at Copenhagen[258]. Elsinore was likewise severely visited[259], and probably, about the same time, most of the towns and villages in that kingdom. But the accounts on this subject in the Danish Chronicles are extremely 256defective[260], as owing to the extraordinary rapidity of this mortal malady, contemporary writers neglected to record, for the information of posterity, the details of a phenomenon, which there, as in other countries, must certainly have been striking from its general prevalence. Even from the imperfect notices that were given respecting it, thus much, however, is clearly perceptible, that it was the same well-known disease as elsewhere, which was now observed to pass through Denmark. In proof of this, it was principally young and strong people, as had been originally the case in England, who sickened, the old and infirm being less affected, and in the course of four and twenty hours, or at most, within two days (?) the life or death of the patient was decided.

The outbreak of the Sweating Fever in Denmark[257] occurred at the end of September, when on the 29th of that month, four hundred people died from it in Copenhagen[258]. Elsinore was also hit hard[259], and likely, around the same time, most towns and villages in that kingdom faced similar issues. However, the accounts of this event in the Danish Chronicles are incredibly 256incomplete[260], as the rapid spread of this deadly illness led contemporary writers to overlook recording the details for future generations about a phenomenon that, like in other countries, must have been noteworthy due to its widespread impact. Even from the limited information available, it's clear that this was the same well-known disease seen elsewhere, which was now making its way through Denmark. Evidence of this is that primarily young and healthy individuals, as was initially the case in England, fell ill; the elderly and weak were less affected, and within twenty-four hours, or at most, within two days (?), the fate of the patient would be determined.

At the same period as in Denmark, the Sweating Sickness spread over the Scandinavian Peninsula, and was productive of the same violent symptoms in the sick, the same terror, and the same mortal anguish in those who were affected by it, not only in the capital of Sweden, where Magnus Erikson, brother of king Gustavus Wasa, died of it, but also over the whole kingdom, and in Norway. The northern historians gave graphic accounts of it, which, on a careful examination of manuscript documents, might perhaps gain still more in colouring and spirit[261]. That the Sweating Sickness likewise penetrated into Lithuania, Poland, and Livonia, if not into a part of Russia, we know only in a general way[262], but doubtless there are written 257documents still in existence in these countries, which only need some careful enquirer to bring them to light. In the mean time, however, it is to be presumed, from the early appearance of the disorder in Prussia, that it prevailed in those countries at the same time as in Germany, Denmark, and the Scandinavian Peninsula. No certain trace is anywhere to be discovered that the Sweating Sickness appeared so late as December, 1529, or in January of the following year, so that, after having lasted upon the whole a quarter of a year, it disappeared everywhere without leaving behind it any sign of its existence, or giving rise to the development of any other diseases. Among these, it pursued its course as a comet among planets, without interfering either with the French Hunger Fever, or the Italian Petechial Fever, proving a striking example to all succeeding ages of those general shocks to which the lives of the human race are subject, and a fearful scourge to the generation which it visited.

During the same time as in Denmark, the Sweating Sickness spread across the Scandinavian Peninsula, causing the same intense symptoms in the sick, the same fear, and the same terrible suffering in those affected. This was true not only in Sweden's capital, where Magnus Erikson, the brother of King Gustavus Wasa, died from it, but also throughout the entire kingdom and in Norway. Northern historians provided vivid accounts of the illness, which, upon reviewing manuscript records, might reveal even more details and intensity[261]. We only know in general terms that the Sweating Sickness also reached Lithuania, Poland, and Livonia, and possibly parts of Russia[262], but there are undoubtedly written 257records still existing in these regions that just need a diligent researcher to uncover them. Meanwhile, it can be presumed from the early onset of the disease in Prussia that it was present in those countries at the same time as in Germany, Denmark, and the Scandinavian Peninsula. There is no reliable evidence that the Sweating Sickness appeared as late as December 1529 or in January of the following year, indicating that after lasting roughly a quarter of a year, it vanished completely without leaving any signs of its presence or leading to any other diseases. It moved through history like a comet among planets, not interfering with the French Hunger Fever or the Italian Petechial Fever, serving as a striking example to future generations of the general shocks to which human life is prone and as a frightening scourge to the population it afflicted.

Sect. 8.—Terror.

The alarm which prevailed in Germany surpasses all description, and bordered upon maniacal despair. As soon as the pestilence appeared on the continent, horrifying accounts of the unheard-of sufferings of those affected, and the certainty of their death, passed like wild-fire from mouth to mouth. Men’s minds were paralysed with terror, and the imagination exaggerated the calamity, which seemed to have come upon them like a last judgment. The English Sweating Sickness was the theme of discourse everywhere, and if any one happened to be taken ill of fever, no matter of what kind, it was immediately converted into this demon, whose spectre form continually haunted the oppressed spirit. At the same time, the unfortunate delusion existed, that whoever wished to escape death when seized with the English pestilence, must perspire for twenty-four hours without intermission[263]. So they put the patients, whether they had the Sweating Sickness or not, (for who had calmness enough to distinguish it?) instantly to bed, covered them with feather-beds and furs, and whilst the stove was heated to the utmost, closed the doors and windows with the greatest 258care to prevent all access of cool air. In order, moreover, to prevent the sufferer, should he be somewhat impatient, from throwing off his hot load, some persons in health likewise lay upon him, and thus oppressed him to such a degree, that he could neither stir hand nor foot, and finally, in this rehearsal of hell, being bathed in an agonizing sweat, gave up the ghost, when, perhaps, if his too officious relatives had manifested a little discretion, he might have been saved without difficulty[264].

The panic in Germany was beyond description and veered into mad despair. As soon as the plague hit the continent, shocking stories of the unimaginable suffering of those affected and the certainty of their death spread like wildfire. People's minds were frozen with fear, and the imagination worsened the crisis, which felt like a final judgment. The English Sweating Sickness became the topic of conversation everywhere, and if anyone showed signs of fever, no matter what kind, it was immediately labeled as this monster, whose haunting presence constantly tormented the distraught. At the same time, there was a misguided belief that anyone wanting to escape death from the English plague must sweat continuously for twenty-four hours[263]. So they put the patients, whether they had the Sweating Sickness or not (since no one was calm enough to tell the difference), straight to bed, piled on feather-beds and furs, and with the stove cranked up to the max, closed the doors and windows tightly to keep out any cool air. Additionally, to prevent the sufferer from tossing aside his heavy coverings, some healthy people would lie on him, which weighed him down to the point where he couldn't move at all, and ultimately, in this hellish ordeal, drenched in agonizing sweat, he died, when perhaps, if his overly eager relatives had shown a bit of caution, he could have easily been saved[264].

There dwelt a physician in Zwickau—we no longer know the name of this estimable man—who, full of zeal for the good of mankind, opposed this destructive folly. He went from house to house, and wherever he found a patient buried in a hot bed, dragged him out with his own hands, everywhere forbad that the sick should thus be tortured with heat, and saved by his decisive conduct, many, who but for him, must have been smothered like the rest[265]. It often happened, at this time, that amidst a circle of friends, if the Sweating Sickness was only brought to mind by a single word, first one, and then another was seized with a tormenting anguish, their blood curdled, and certain of their destruction, they quietly slunk away home, and there actually became a prey to death[266]. This mortal fear is a heavy addition to the scourge of rapidly fatal epidemics, and is, properly speaking, an inflammatory disease of the mind, which, in its proximate effects upon the spirits, bears some resemblance to the nightmare. It confuses the understanding, so as to render it incapable of estimating external circumstances according to their true relations to each other; it magnifies a gnat into a monster, a distant improbable danger into a horrible spectre which takes a firm hold of the imagination; all actions are perverted, and if during this state of distraction, any other disease break out, the patient conceives that he is the devoted 259victim of the much dreaded epidemic, like those unfortunate persons, who, having been bitten by a harmless animal, nevertheless become the subjects of an imaginary hydrophobia. Thus, during the calamitous autumn of 1529, many may have been seized with only an imaginary Sweating Sickness, and under the towering heap of clothing on their loaded beds have met with their graves[267]. Others among these brain-sick people who had the good fortune to remain exempt from bodily ailments, many of them even boasting of their firmness, fell, through the violent commotions in their nerves, into a state of chronic hypochondriasis, which, under circumstances of this sort, is marked by shuddering, and a feeling of uneasiness and dread at the bare mention of the original cause of terror, even when there is no longer any trace of its existence[268]. A person thus disordered in his mind, was recently seen to destroy himself[269] on receiving false intelligence of the return of the late epidemic; thus betraying conduct even more dastardly than those cowardly soldiers, who, when the cannon begin to roar, inflict on themselves slight wounds that they may avoid sharing the dangers of the battle.

There was a doctor in Zwickau—we no longer know the name of this respected man—who, eager to help others, opposed this destructive madness. He went door to door, and wherever he found someone suffering in a hot bed, he pulled them out himself, everywhere forbidding the sick to be tortured by heat. Thanks to his decisive actions, many people, who otherwise would have suffocated like the others, were saved[265]. It often happened at this time that, in a group of friends, if the Sweating Sickness was mentioned even once, one person after another would be gripped by an overwhelming fear, their blood would run cold, and convinced of their inevitable doom, they would slip away home, ultimately falling victim to death[266]. This mortal fear is a heavy burden on the scourge of rapidly fatal epidemics and is, in essence, a psychological condition that bears some resemblance to a nightmare. It confuses the mind, making it unable to accurately assess external circumstances and their true relationships; it blows a gnat out of proportion into a monster, transforms a distant, unlikely danger into a terrifying specter that firmly grips the imagination; all actions become distorted, and if, during this state of distraction, another illness arises, the patient believes they are a doomed victim of the dreaded epidemic, much like those unfortunate souls who, after being bitten by a harmless animal, become convinced they have rabies. Thus, during the disastrous autumn of 1529, many may have only experienced an imagined Sweating Sickness, and under the heavy layers of clothing on their overloaded beds, they met their end[267]. Others among these troubled individuals who were fortunate enough to avoid physical ailments—many even boasting of their strength—fell into a state of chronic hypochondria due to the intense strain on their nerves, which, in such situations, is characterized by shivering and a sense of unease and dread at the mere mention of the original source of their fear, even when there is no longer any sign of its existence[268]. A person in such a disturbed state of mind was recently seen to take their own life[269] after receiving false news about the return of the past epidemic; thus displaying behavior even more cowardly than those soldiers who, when the cannons start firing, inflict minor wounds on themselves to avoid facing the dangers of battle.

To have a full notion how men’s minds were previously prepared for this state, we have but to think on the monstrous events which took place in Germany. Twelve years earlier the gigantic work of the reformation had been begun by the greatest German of that age, and, with the Divine power of the gospel, triumphantly carried through up to that period. The excitement was beyond all bounds. The new doctrine took root in towns and villages, but nevertheless the most mortal party hatred raged on all sides, and as usually happens in times of such empassioned commotion, selfishness was the animating spirit which ruled on both sides, and seized the torch of faith, in order, for her unholy purposes, to envelop the world in fire and flames.

To fully understand how people's minds were shaped for this situation, we just need to consider the drastic events that happened in Germany. Twelve years earlier, the monumental work of the Reformation had been started by the greatest German of that time, and, with the divine power of the gospel, it was successfully carried through up to that point. The excitement was overwhelming. The new doctrine took root in towns and villages, yet fierce party hatred raged all around. As often happens during such intense turmoil, selfishness was the driving force that influenced both sides, capturing the light of faith to use for its own corrupt ends, spreading chaos throughout the world.

So early as the year 1521, during Luther’s concealment 260within the walls of Wartburg, false prophets[270] arose, and desired, without the aid of their great Master, who was the soul of that age, to complete a work with the spirit of which they were not imbued. They brought the wildest passions into action, but, destitute of innate firmness, and incapable of curbing themselves, they became incendiaries and iconoclasts. Immediately upon this the unhappy peasant-war broke out—a consequence of the arbitrary conduct and oppression practised from times of old, for which the abettors of Dr. Eck’s sentiments would charge Luther himself as answerable; not perceiving that it was the excitement of the times and of the false prophets which had given occasion to the rebellion. Events occurred, from the recollection of which human feeling still recoils. Never was the fair soil of Germany the scene of more atrocious cruelties; and after vengeance had played her insane part without opposition, the melancholy result was, that hundreds of thousands of once peaceful, and for the most part misled peasants, fell by the sword of the Lansquenets and of the executioner, while their numerous survivors became a prey to the dearth which visited the country in the following years. The battle of Frankenhausen on the 15th of May, 1525, and Münzer’s subsequent execution, closed this bloody scene. The consequences of such intestine commotions continued however to be felt long after, and considered apart from their highly prejudicial influence on the prosperity of the people, conduced not a little to break the spirit of mankind, signs of which the wise men of those times have plainly pointed out[271].

So early as 1521, while Luther was hidden away in Wartburg, false prophets arose, hoping to continue the work of their great Master, who was the heart of that era, without his guidance. They stirred up wild passions, and lacking any inner strength to control themselves, they became instigators and destroyers. This led to the unfortunate peasant war—a result of long-standing oppression, for which supporters of Dr. Eck would blame Luther himself, not realizing it was the tumult of the times and the false prophets that sparked the rebellion. Events unfolded that still provoke a strong emotional response. Germany never witnessed such horrific cruelty; after vengeance wreaked havoc unopposed, the tragic outcome was that hundreds of thousands of once-peaceful, mostly misguided peasants fell to the swords of the Landsknechts and executioners, while many survivors suffered due to the famine that struck the country in the following years. The battle of Frankenhausen on May 15, 1525, and Münzer's subsequent execution marked the end of this bloody chapter. However, the effects of such internal strife were felt long afterward, and aside from their severely damaging impact on the people’s welfare, they contributed significantly to breaking the spirit of mankind, as highlighted by the wise men of that time.

261

261

Sect. 9.—Moral Consequences.

The dejection was increased by the universally active spirit of persecution with which it was still hoped to eradicate the new doctrine. Even whilst the English pestilence was raging, two Protestants were burnt at Cologne[272]. In the same year faggots blazed at Mecklin, Verden, and Paris, by the flames of which the ancient faith was to be protected against the pestilence of freedom of thought. Sentences of death were also quite commonly pronounced against the Anabaptists in Protestant countries. The University of Leipzig pronounced a condemnation of this sort in the year 1529, and in Freistadt eleven women were drowned after a nominal trial and sentence, because they acknowledged that they were of this sect[273]. Amidst these dissensions, and when the empire was in this helpless condition, came the fear of the barbarians of the south, who had already conquered Hungary under their Sultan Soliman, and, whilst the English Sweat was raging in the countries of the Danube, threatened to overwhelm Germany. It was a time of distress and lamentations, in which even the most undaunted could scarcely sustain their courage[274]; but to the everlasting honour of the Germans it must be acknowledged that they withstood this purifying fire with unsullied honour, and in a manner worthy of themselves. For their noble spirits were aroused to unheard-of exertions of energy, and whilst the pusillanimous gave themselves up to despair, they impressed on the gigantic work of their age the stamp of imperishable truth.

The disappointment was heightened by the widespread mindset of persecution aimed at eliminating the new belief. Even while the English disease was spreading, two Protestants were burned at the stake in Cologne[272]. That same year, fires were lit in Mecklin, Verden, and Paris, where the flames aimed to protect the old faith against the threat of freedom of thought. Death sentences were also commonly handed out to Anabaptists in Protestant regions. The University of Leipzig issued one such condemnation in 1529, and in Freistadt, eleven women were drowned after a brief trial simply for admitting they belonged to this sect[273]. Among these conflicts, as the empire found itself in dire straits, the fear of the southern barbarians emerged, having already conquered Hungary under their Sultan Soliman, and while the English Sweat swept through the Danube regions, they threatened to overrun Germany. It was a time of hardship and mourning, where even the bravest struggled to maintain their courage[274]; yet, to the enduring credit of the Germans, it must be recognized that they faced this purifying fire with unblemished honor, demonstrating their true character. Their noble spirits sparked unprecedented efforts, and while the fearful succumbed to despair, they left an indelible mark on the monumental work of their time, infused with lasting truth.

The siege of Vienna began on the 22d of September, after the English pestilence had broken out in this capital of Austria, yet nobody regarded this internal danger. The repeated attempts made by the Turks to storm the town were repulsed with great courage, and, on the 15th of October, Soliman raised the siege, after the Sweating Sickness had raged with as much violence among his troops as among the besieged[275]. There is 262no accurate intelligence extant upon this subject, because the pestilence was less regarded here than elsewhere, in consequence of the great distress of the country from other causes, yet the mortality in Austria under such unfavourable circumstances, was doubtless more considerable than in the neighbouring states[276].

The siege of Vienna started on September 22nd, after an outbreak of the English plague hit this capital of Austria, but nobody took this internal threat seriously. The Turks made several attempts to storm the city but were pushed back bravely. On October 15th, Soliman lifted the siege after the Sweating Sickness spread as violently among his troops as it did among those inside the city[275]. There is 262no accurate information available on this topic because the plague was less emphasized here than in other places, due to the country's significant distress from other issues. Nevertheless, the death toll in Austria under such dire circumstances was certainly higher than in neighboring states[276].

In the north of Germany another struggle was to be decided. The evangelical party wished to declare their faith before the empire and its ruler, to reveal the object of their efforts, and to defend the purity of their creed against danger and assault. For this purpose they prepared themselves with wise discretion, and in the measures taken by the reformers for the fortification of the great work, not the slightest trace was to be observed of the anxiety which at that time agitated the people. In the midst of a country whose inhabitants trembled at the new disease, and were perhaps already severely afflicted with it, did Luther, whilst at Marburg[277], sketch the first outlines of a profession of faith, which, as filled up by Melancthon, has become the foundation-stone of the evangelical church; and in the following spring, during his stay at Cobourg, he composed his sublime hymn, “Eine feste burg ist unser Gott,” a strong fortress is our God.

In northern Germany, another struggle was about to unfold. The evangelical group wanted to publicly declare their beliefs to the empire and its leader, to show the purpose of their efforts, and to protect the integrity of their faith from threats and attacks. For this, they prepared thoughtfully, and in the steps taken by the reformers to strengthen their major work, there was no sign of the anxiety that was stirring in the people at that time. In a land where the residents were fearful of the new disease and possibly already suffering from it, Luther, while in Marburg[277], outlined the initial framework of a statement of faith, which, once completed by Melancthon, became the cornerstone of the evangelical church. The following spring, during his time in Cobourg, he wrote his powerful hymn, "Eine feste burg ist unser Gott," which means "A strong fortress is our God."

It could not but happen that, in the religious struggles which took place in these years, especial importance would be attributed to the English pestilence. Epidemics readily appear to man, in the narrow circle of his view, as scourges of God; and, indeed, this representation of them has ever been the prevailing one in all religions. For it is easier to estimate the ever-existing sins of humanity than the grand commotions comprehending both mind and body, of a terrestrial organism, which can only be perceived by a superior insight into things; and the mean selfishness of mankind and their delusions respecting their own qualities induce them to adopt the more easily the partial view, that the Supreme Being allows pestilences to exist only to destroy their enemies of another faith. On this account, not only do most contemporary writers speak of the just wrath of God, and of the chastisement thus prepared for the sins of the world[278], but the papal party took every possible 263pains to represent the English pestilence as a punishment for heresy and an evident warning against the triumphant doctrines of Luther. The cases in Hamburgh, where the eruption of the Sweating Sickness almost immediately followed the abolition of the monasteries, may certainly have obtained credit for such representations among the wavering and short-sighted, and, in a hundred other towns also, the Papists may have taken advantage of a similar occurrence of circumstances, for 1529 was a year when great and important questions were decided. At Lübeck, the monks in general preached that the English sweating fever was but a punishment which heaven inflicted on the Martineans, for so they called the followers of Luther, and the people were not undeceived until they saw with astonishment that Catholics also fell sick and died[279]. They went, however, much further, and did not hesitate to employ even falsehood and cruel revenge to gain their ends. Thus it was asserted that the meeting of the reformers at Marburg, on the 2d of October, had led to no union among them, because a panic at the new disease had seized the heretics[280]. Never did a dastardly fear of death enter the heart of Luther, who, when the plague broke out at Wittenburg in 1527, cheerfully and courageously remained at his post whilst all around him fled, and the high school was removed to Jena. Moreover, as we have seen, the Sweating Sickness never once came near Marburg, and the union of the two evangelical churches failed on totally different grounds.

It was inevitable that during the religious conflicts of these years, significant importance would be placed on the English plague. Epidemics often appear to people, in their limited perspective, as punishments from God; and indeed, this view has always been prevalent in all religions. It’s easier to acknowledge the ongoing sins of humanity than to understand the vast upheavals affecting both mind and body, which can only be grasped through a deeper insight. The selfishness of humankind and their misunderstandings about their own qualities lead them to adopt the simpler view that the Supreme Being permits plagues to exist solely to punish their enemies of a different faith. For this reason, most contemporary writers discuss God's righteous anger and the punishment prepared for the sins of the world[278]. Additionally, the papal faction worked tirelessly to portray the English plague as a punishment for heresy and a clear warning against the victorious doctrines of Luther. The outbreak of the Sweating Sickness in Hamburg, which almost immediately followed the dissolution of the monasteries, may have lent credence to such portrayals among the indecisive and short-sighted, and in many other towns, the Papists likely exploited similar circumstances, as 1529 was a year when significant questions were resolved. In Lübeck, the monks generally preached that the English sweating fever was merely a punishment inflicted by heaven on the followers of Luther, whom they called Martineans, and the people weren’t disillusioned until they were shocked to see Catholics also falling sick and dying[279]. However, they went much further and didn't hesitate to use falsehood and cruel revenge to achieve their goals. It was claimed that the meeting of the reformers in Marburg on October 2nd had not resulted in any unity among them because the heretics were gripped by panic over the new disease[280]. Never did fear of death cowardly enter Luther’s heart, who, when the plague hit Wittenburg in 1527, stayed at his post cheerfully and courageously while everyone else fled and the high school was moved to Jena. Moreover, as we have seen, the Sweating Sickness never once approached Marburg, and the unification of the two evangelical churches failed for entirely different reasons.

In Cologne the zealots were of opinion that they ought to endeavour to appease the visible wrath of God by the punishment of the heretics, and it was this sanguinary delusion, worthy of savage barbarians, which hastened the burning of Flistedt and Clarenbach[281]. To the completion of this picture of the times, many other minor touches might be added, of which the following may be taken as an example. In the March of Brandenburg 264the evangelical faith, notwithstanding great obstacles, spread every day more and more, and the Catholic priests soon found themselves deserted. Just as the Sweating Sickness broke out at Friedeberg, in the Newmark, a curate there delivered a sermon full of enthusiasm and passion, and endeavoured to convince his apostate congregation that God had invented a new plague in order to chastise the new heresy. A solemn procession, according to ancient usage and orthodox prescription, was to be held on the following day, and thus the congregation was to be led back into the bosom of the only true church. But behold, in the course of the night, the zealous curate died of some sudden disease; and as mankind are ever ready to interpret even the thunders of the Eternal according to their own wishes and narrow notions, the Protestants, it seems, did not fail in their turn to represent this event as a miracle[282].

In Cologne, the zealots believed they should try to calm God's visible anger by punishing heretics, and it was this bloody delusion, fitting for savage barbarians, that sped up the burning of Flistedt and Clarenbach[281]. To finish painting this picture of the times, many other small details could be added, of which the following serves as an example. In the March of Brandenburg 264, the evangelical faith, despite significant challenges, spread more and more each day, and Catholic priests soon found themselves abandoned. Just as the Sweating Sickness erupted in Friedeberg, in the Newmark, a curate there gave a sermon full of enthusiasm and passion, trying to convince his converted congregation that God had created a new plague to punish the new heresy. A solemn procession, following ancient customs and orthodox practices, was scheduled for the next day, meant to lead the congregation back into the embrace of the one true church. But lo and behold, during the night, the zealous curate died from some sudden illness; and since people are always ready to interpret the thunders of the Eternal according to their own desires and narrow views, the Protestants seemed to take this event as a miracle[282].

Sect. 10.—The Physicians.

Under these circumstances, the faculty had a very difficult problem before them, for the very imperfect solution of which they cannot justly be reproached. A learned and active physician is certainly one of the noblest of the diversified forms of humanity; for he unites in himself the power arising from an insight into the works of nature, with the exercise of a pure philanthropy inseparable from his office. Few men, however, of this ideal perfection lived in those times, and their mitigating influence over the violence of the epidemic, which was generally past before they could closely examine their new enemy and give any deliberate advice, was doubtless but very inconsiderable. By so much the more busy were the ignorant and covetous, who, from time immemorial, the more numerous body in the profession, have always injured it in its moral dignity. They attacked the disease with bold assertions, alarmed the people with inconsiderate representations, lauded the infallibility of their remedies, and were the promulgators of injurious prejudices. In the Netherlands, as we are assured by Tyengius, a physician whom we reckon among the learned and benevolent, a vast number of patients died of the effects produced by the distribution of pernicious pamphlets, with which the 265Sweating Sickness was to be combated by those ignorant interlopers, who many of them gave it out that they had been in England, boasting to the inhabitants of their experience and skill, and with their pills and their “hellish electuaries,” flitting about from place to place[283], especially where rich merchants were to be found, from whom, should they be restored, they obtained the promise of mines of gold[284]. The like occurred in Germany, where, at the commencement, the sound sense of the people was overcome by this officiousness, and violent remedies were recommended as certain means of cure, in a deluge of pamphlets, some of which were written by persons not in the profession.

Under these circumstances, the faculty faced a tough problem, for which they can’t justly be blamed for the imperfect solution. A knowledgeable and active physician is definitely one of the noblest forms of humanity; he combines understanding of nature’s workings with a commitment to pure philanthropy that comes with his profession. However, few men of such ideal character existed during those times, and their impact on easing the severity of the epidemic, which had generally passed before they could thoroughly investigate this new threat and give any considered advice, was likely quite minor. Meanwhile, the ignorant and greedy, who throughout history have made up the larger group in this profession, were much more active, detracting from its moral integrity. They approached the disease with confident claims, frightened the public with reckless statements, praised the infallibility of their treatments, and spread harmful misconceptions. In the Netherlands, as confirmed by Tyengius, a physician we regard as learned and kind, many patients died from the consequences of harmful pamphlets distributed by those ignorant interlopers, who often claimed they had been to England, boasting about their experience and expertise. They traveled from place to place, especially where wealthy merchants could be found, promising them riches if they could be cured with their pills and “dangerous concoctions”[283]. A similar situation occurred in Germany, where, at the start, the common sense of the people was overwhelmed by this overzealousness, and extreme remedies were promoted as guaranteed cures in a flood of pamphlets, some written by individuals not even in the profession.

From this impure source was derived the prescription of the compulsory[285] perspiration for twenty-four hours, which, in the districts of the Rhine, was called the Netherlands regimen[286]; and it is unpardonable, that the physicians, either with blind pride disregarded, or were totally unacquainted with the prior experience of the English, which advocated discretion and the most appropriate line of treatment. This neglect, which was not compensated until thousands had already fallen, may possibly have arisen from the blameable silence of the English physicians, of whom, as if England had not yet been enlightened by the dawn of science, not an individual had written on the Sweating Sickness, or proposed a reasonable line of treatment, since the year 1485. Between England and Germany there existed, nevertheless, a constant intercourse; and it is incredible that that mode of procedure, which did not originate from a formal medical school, but from the sound sense of the people, should not have become earlier known on this side of the North Sea.

From this impure source came the recommendation for mandatory perspiration for twenty-four hours, which was known as the Netherlands regimen in the Rhine regions; and it is unacceptable that the doctors, whether out of blind arrogance or complete ignorance of the English's earlier experiences that promoted caution and the most suitable treatment approaches, overlooked this. This neglect, which wasn’t addressed until thousands had already suffered, may have stemmed from the unacceptable silence of English physicians, of whom, as if England had yet to awaken to the light of science, not one had written about the Sweating Sickness or suggested a sensible treatment plan since the year 1485. Despite the ongoing communication between England and Germany, it is astonishing that a method of treatment that didn’t come from an official medical school but rather from common sense among the people didn’t become known on this side of the North Sea sooner.

266

266

We must not here overlook the habits and domestic manners of the Germans, for these favoured not a little the baneful prejudice with regard to heat, for which we would not altogether make the physicians responsible. Housewives, even at that time, set far too much store by high beds, which annually received the feathers of the geese consumed at the table. The comforts of a warm feather bed were highly appreciated, and least of all were they disposed to deny them to the sick. Thus all inflammatory disorders were stimulated to much greater malignity, because such a bed either caused a dry heat, even to the extent of burning fever, or a useless debilitating perspiration. To this effect the very extensive misuse of hot baths conduced; and no less so the custom of clothing much too warmly. Upon the whole the notion was prevalent, as well with the people as with medical men, that diseases were to be combated by warmth and sudorifics. To new epidemics, however, the prevailing notions and customs are always applied; for the great mass of mankind, among whom may be included medical men, are entirely ruled by them; so that in this instance, the Sweating Sickness fell upon a country in which its utmost malignity would be called forth.

We shouldn’t overlook the habits and home life of the Germans, as these contributed significantly to the harmful belief about heat, which we can't completely blame on the doctors. Even back then, housewives placed too much value on high beds, which were annually filled with the feathers from the geese eaten at their tables. The comfort of a warm feather bed was highly valued, and they were least likely to deny this comfort to the sick. As a result, all inflammatory conditions became much worse because such a bed either created a dry heat, even leading to a burning fever, or caused a pointless draining sweat. This issue was further aggravated by the excessive use of hot baths and the habit of dressing far too warmly. Overall, the idea that diseases should be treated with warmth and sweating was widespread among both the public and medical professionals. However, prevailing beliefs and customs were always applied to new epidemics, as the majority of people, including doctors, were entirely influenced by them. So in this case, the Sweating Sickness hit a country where it would reach its peak severity.

Yet after the first few days, in which many unfortunate cases occurred, people became aware of the error they had committed. An advocate of the twenty-four hours’ sudation, who, though not a medical man, had lauded this practice in a pamphlet on the subject[287], died in Zwickau on the 5th of September, the victim of his own imprudence. A few days after him died an apothecary, likewise treated with the heated bed. Upon this the physicians immediately abandoned the practice, directed that their patients should be sweated only for five or six hours, and in a more moderate degree: and the estimable anonymous writer to whom we have already alluded, thus seemed to meet with converts to his belief. In Hamburgh also, men became convinced of the pernicious effects of feather beds, and gave the preference to coverings of blankets[288]; for the English plan of treatment was presently known, and intelligent philanthropists, who saw its curative powers, made it public[289] in all quarters, through the medium of their correspondence. In Lübeck there lived at the time of the Sweating 267Fever a learned Protestant Englishman, Dr. Anthony Barns, who, with great kindness, made known everywhere the English treatment of the disease. He was, however, after the cessation of the pestilence, banished from the city, because he had petitioned the bigoted Catholic senate to tolerate his Protestant brethren. Many were saved by him; for it was the practice in this city also, to stew to death[290] those affected with the disease. In Stettin the English treatment was promulgated in good time, and two travelling artisans who had come thither from Hamburgh, were of the greatest assistance to the inhabitants of this city, by advising them to take the feathers out of their upper beds; they made known likewise how the sickness had been treated with success. They had seen cases themselves, and could therefore distinguish by their odour those who were suffering from the true sweating epidemic, from those who were seized with fever arising from panic. They were constantly besieged by persons asking questions and seeking assistance; and when the disease was at its greatest height, the streets were quite illuminated at night by the lights of the relatives of the patients[291], who were running in all directions in a state of distraction. The abhorrence of feather beds, and the hot plan, now followed so quickly the blind recommendation of the twenty-four hours’ sweat, that by the middle of September, and in many places still earlier, more correct views were generally adopted, and some intelligent men, after the sad experience which had been gained, seized the opportunity of doing more good to the public than their noisy predecessors, who had by this time so abundantly supplied the churchyards with bodies. Among these literally and truly beneficent physicians may be reckoned Peter Wild, at Worms[292], who warned his countrymen against the Netherlands practice[293]; as also an anonymous person, (the names of the best often remain unknown in times of confusion,) who, in popular language, strenuously dissuaded the people against the use of feather beds[294]. It also 268soon became a common saying, ”the Sweating Sickness will bear no medicine.”[295]

Yet after the first few days, during which many unfortunate cases occurred, people began to realize the mistake they had made. An advocate of the twenty-four-hour sweating method, who, although not a medical professional, had praised this practice in a pamphlet on the subject[287], died in Zwickau on September 5th, a victim of his own recklessness. A few days later, an apothecary who was also treated with the heated bed died as well. Following this, the physicians immediately abandoned the practice, instructing that their patients should undergo sweating only for five or six hours and at a more moderate level. The respected anonymous writer we’ve mentioned before seemed to gain followers for his beliefs. In Hamburg, people became convinced of the harmful effects of feather beds and preferred to use blankets[288]; the English treatment plan quickly became known, and thoughtful philanthropists, recognizing its healing benefits, spread the word[289] through their correspondence. At the time of the Sweating Fever, a learned Protestant Englishman, Dr. Anthony Barns, lived in Lübeck, who kindly publicized the English treatment for the disease everywhere. However, after the plague subsided, he was banished from the city for petitioning the bigoted Catholic senate to show tolerance toward his Protestant brethren. Many were saved by him; for in this city, it was also common practice, to stew to death[290] those affected by the disease. In Stettin, the English treatment was promoted in good time, and two traveling craftsmen who had come from Hamburg greatly assisted the local residents by advising them to remove the feathers from their top beds; they also shared how the sickness had been successfully treated. They had seen cases themselves, allowing them to identify by smell those suffering from the actual sweating epidemic versus those who were fevered from panic. They were constantly approached by people asking questions and seeking help; when the illness peaked, the streets were lit up at night by the lights of relatives of the patients[291], who were running around in a state of panic. The disdain for feather beds and the hot treatment quickly followed the blind recommendation of the twenty-four-hour sweat, so that by the middle of September, and in many places even earlier, more accurate views were generally adopted. Some insightful individuals, learning from the sad experiences, took the opportunity to do more good for the public than their loud predecessors, who had by now filled the churchyards with bodies. Among these genuinely beneficent physicians was Peter Wild in Worms[292], who warned his fellow countrymen against the practices in the Netherlands[293]; as well as an anonymous person, (the names of the best often remain unknown in times of chaos,) who passionately urged the public against using feather beds[294]. It soon became a common saying, “the Sweating Sickness will bear no medicine.”[295]

269

269

There is no ground for supposing that the influence of the faculty was much greater in the country where the Sweating Sickness originated than it was in Germany, for the number of learned physicians there was still fewer, and the knowledge of medicine not nearly so extended as it was in Italy, Germany, and France. The learned Linacre had already died in the year 1524. John Chambre[296], Edward Wotton[297], and George Owen[298], were the King’s body physicians about the time of the fourth epidemic visitation of the Sweating Sickness. William Butts[299] of whom Shakespeare[300] has made honourable mention, in all probability likewise held a similar office. These were certainly distinguished and worthy men[301], but posterity has gained nothing from them on the subject of the English Sweating Sickness. All these physicians were well informed, zealous, and doubtless also cautious followers of the ancient Greek school of medicine, but their merits were of no advantage to the people, who, when they departed from the dictates of their own understanding, and did not content themselves with domestic remedies, to which they had been accustomed, fell into the hands of a set of surgeons so rude and ignorant that they could only exist in the state of society which then prevailed[302].

There’s no reason to believe that the influence of the faculty was any greater in the country where the Sweating Sickness began than it was in Germany, since there were even fewer learned physicians there, and medical knowledge was not nearly as widespread as it was in Italy, Germany, and France. The educated Linacre had already passed away in 1524. John Chambre[296], Edward Wotton[297], and George Owen[298] were the King’s personal physicians around the time of the fourth outbreak of the Sweating Sickness. William Butts[299], who Shakespeare[300] mentioned with respect, likely held a similar position. They were certainly distinguished and worthy men[301], but posterity has learned nothing from them about the English Sweating Sickness. These physicians were knowledgeable, eager, and probably careful followers of the ancient Greek medical school, but their contributions were of no benefit to the people, who, when they ignored their own instincts and didn't stick to the home remedies they were used to, ended up in the hands of a group of surgeons who were so crude and uneducated that they could only exist in the society of that time[302].

270

270

Sect. 11.—Pamphlets.

Inexplicable as the silence of the learned physicians of England, on the Sweating Sickness, appears at first view, (for where is the use of learning if it fail to throw any light on the stormy phenomena of life?) we may yet find, perhaps, its cause in a perfectly simple external circumstance. The reformation had not yet begun in England, the Catholic Church still stood on its ancient foundations, and an intellectual intercourse between the learned and the people was not by any means among the acknowledged desiderata. The faculty would hence have been able to treat of the new disorder only in ponderous Latin works, for they wrote unwillingly in their own language, and the subject could not seem to them an appropriate one for this purpose, because they found it unnoticed and uninvestigated by their highly revered masters the Greeks. They were ignorant that a sweating fever had ever appeared among the ancients, which, otherwise, might have incited them to make researches of their own on the subject; for Aurelian, who describes it to the life, was either unknown to them, or, what at that time was a valid ground, was despised by them, on account of his bad (unclassical) language.

As puzzling as the silence of England's learned physicians regarding the Sweating Sickness may seem at first glance (after all, what's the point of education if it doesn't help us understand the chaotic events of life?), we might find that the reason is actually quite straightforward and linked to external factors. The Reformation hadn't started in England yet, the Catholic Church was still firmly established, and there wasn't a significant interaction between scholars and the general public. Consequently, the doctors could only discuss the new disease in heavy Latin texts, as they were reluctant to write in their own language, and they likely didn't see the topic as suitable for such discourse since it was overlooked and unexplored by their esteemed Greek predecessors. They were unaware that a sweating fever had ever existed in ancient times, which might have inspired them to conduct their own investigations; Aurelian, who accurately described it, was either unknown to them or, given the standards of the time, looked down upon for his poor (non-classical) language.

In Germany, on the contrary, the intellectual wants of the people and of the educated classes had already manifested themselves very differently. Twelve years before, the age of pamphlets had there commenced. The thoughts of Luther and of his disciples, as also of his opposers were winged by the rapid press, and the people took an impassioned part in the endeavours of the learned to affect their conviction, and by this 271altogether novel and authoritative mode of religious instruction, became gradually educated and guided. Hence it is not to be wondered at that people began to investigate, in pamphlets, other important subjects likewise, and thus we see this weighty branch of intellectual commerce, with all its advantages and defects, also turned towards the discussion of popular diseases, and for the first time unfolding its numerous leaves on the subject of the English epidemic. In the maritime cities nothing of this kind happened, because the eruption of the pestilence took them by surprise, and as it was over again in the course of a few weeks, it seemed no longer worth while to instruct the people respecting it.

In Germany, on the other hand, the intellectual needs of the people and the educated classes had already shown themselves very differently. Twelve years earlier, the era of pamphlets had begun there. The ideas of Luther and his followers, as well as those of his opponents, spread rapidly through the press, and the public passionately engaged in the efforts of scholars to influence their beliefs. Through this entirely new and authoritative way of religious teaching, they gradually became educated and guided. Therefore, it's not surprising that people began to explore other important topics in pamphlets as well, leading to this significant area of intellectual exchange, with all its pros and cons, also focusing on discussions about popular diseases, and for the first time revealing a lot about the English epidemic. In the coastal cities, nothing like this occurred because they were caught off guard by the outbreak of the plague, and since it ended within a few weeks, it no longer seemed necessary to inform the public about it.

This surprise was very plainly shewn in the answer of the doctors and licentiates who were assembled together at the bedside of the Duchess, at Stettin: “the disease was new and unknown to them: they were at a loss what to advise, excepting strengthening medicines.”[303] In the central parts of Germany, on the contrary, where, as early as the month of August, the report of the new plague had excited the utmost alarm, and where an eruption of the pestilence in Zwickau had caused a general flight, publications on the Sweating Sickness were even within that month, and still more numerously in September, disseminated in all directions. As scientific productions, they are almost all of them worthless. Many of them, indeed, did harm, and but very few promulgated correct views. Most of them are now lost, as, for example, that which was published by the printer Frantz, at Zwickau, on the 3rd of September: but in what vast numbers they were published appears from the circumstance that Dr. Bayer, at Leipzig, who brought out his own on the 4th of September, states that he has read many of them, and expresses his indignation against these “new unfounded little books,” by which the people were misled to their own sorrow and suffering[304]. This same Dr. Bayer writes in the style of an intelligent practical physician, inveighs boldly against the prejudices of mankind, and the ignorance of medical journeymen, and against their senseless bleedings whenever they see the barber’s basin and his pole. Some of his advice too is not bad, especially where he is speaking of the Arabian use of harmless syrups. He, however, religiously preserves all the rubbish of his age, and has a great opinion of preventive 272bleedings, purgatives, and powerful medicines, of which he prescribes so many that his reader is necessarily confused by their multiplicity. His precepts respecting the sweat are very appropriate, for he gives a caution against forcing perspiration, prescribes according to the circumstances, and even commences the treatment with an emetic, if the state of the stomach seems to indicate its employment. In order to guard against contagion, he recommends, at the approaching autumnal fair, that foreigners from “dying landsshould be accommodated in distinct inns, that fumigation should be carefully employed, and that before each booth at the fair a fire should be kept up.

This surprise was clearly evident in the responses of the doctors and licensed practitioners gathered at the Duchess's bedside in Stettin: “the disease was new and unfamiliar to them; they were unsure what to recommend, aside from strengthening remedies.”[303] In contrast, in central Germany, where reports of the new plague had sparked significant alarm as early as August, and where an outbreak of the disease in Zwickau had triggered widespread panic, publications on the Sweating Sickness were circulated extensively that month and even more so in September. Most of these scientific writings were nearly worthless, with many causing harm and only a few offering correct insights. Many have now been lost, such as the one published by printer Frantz in Zwickau on September 3rd. However, it is clear there were many publications, as Dr. Bayer in Leipzig, who released his own on September 4th, noted that he had read several and expressed his frustration with these “new unfounded little books” that misled people to their own detriment[304]. This same Dr. Bayer writes like a knowledgeable, practical physician, boldly criticizing the biases of society and the ignorance of medical apprentices, as well as their mindless bloodletting whenever they see the barber's basin and pole. Some of his advice is quite good, especially regarding the harmless syrups used in Arabian medicine. Nevertheless, he clings to many outdated practices and puts great stock in preventive bloodletting, purgatives, and strong medicines, prescribing so many that his readers become bewildered by the sheer number. His guidelines about sweating are particularly apt, as he warns against forcing perspiration, customizes his recommendations based on circumstances, and even begins treatment with an emetic if the state of the stomach suggests it. To prevent contagion, he recommends that during the upcoming autumn fair, foreigners from “dying landsshould stay in separate inns, that fumigation should be diligently practiced, and that a fire should be kept burning in front of each stall at the fair.

Another pamphlet by Caspar Kegeler, of Leipzig, is a melancholy monument of the credulity which, from Herophilus to the present day, has pervaded the whole medical art. It is a regular pharmacopœia for the Sweating Sickness, thrown together at a venture, without any insight into the nature of the disease. A mine of wonderful pills and electuaries composed of numberless ingredients wherewith this “mysterious worthy” undertakes to raise a commotion in the bodies of his patients. If he had but seen even a single case of the disease he would at least have known how impossible it would be to administer, within the space of four-and-twenty hours, the hundredth part of his pills and draughts. With what approbation this little pharmacopœia was received by physicians of equal penetration and understanding as himself, is shewn by the eight editions which it passed through[305], and the melancholy reflection is therefore forced upon us, that possibly thousands of sick persons were maltreated and sacrificed from the employment of Kegeler’s medicines.

Another pamphlet by Caspar Kegeler, from Leipzig, is a sad reminder of the gullibility that has plagued medicine from Herophilus to today. It’s basically a recipe book for treating the Sweating Sickness, thrown together without any real understanding of the disease. It’s filled with fantastic pills and mixtures made from countless ingredients, where this “mysterious expert” tries to create a stir in his patients' bodies. If he had even seen one case of the illness, he would at least have realized how impossible it would be to give even a tiny fraction of his pills and mixtures within twenty-four hours. The fact that this little collection was so well-received by doctors as clueless as him is shown by the eight editions it went through[305], and it’s a sad thought that perhaps thousands of sick people were mistreated and lost because of Kegeler’s remedies.

A third physician at Leipzig, Dr. John Hellwetter, states in his pamphlet, that he has become acquainted with the Sweating Fever in foreign countries, and on the subject of perspiration gives some very good advice, evidently the result of his own experience, which reminds us of the original English mode of treatment. His notion that fish is injurious seems to have originated in the fact that the continued employment of fish as an article of diet gives rise to offensive perspirations, and his admonition to his medical brethren not to flee from the sick, but to visit them sedulously and give them consolation, furnishes ground for supposing that some of them had been pusillanimous 273and dishonourable enough to withdraw themselves or to refuse their assistance to the poor.

A third doctor in Leipzig, Dr. John Hellwetter, mentions in his pamphlet that he has encountered the Sweating Fever in other countries and offers some solid advice on perspiration, clearly based on his own experiences, which brings to mind the original English treatment methods. His belief that fish is harmful seems to stem from the idea that a diet high in fish leads to unpleasant body odors, and his warning to fellow doctors not to shy away from the sick, but to visit them diligently and offer comfort, suggests that some of them may have cowardly and dishonorably chosen to withdraw or refuse help to those in need. 273

Almost all the medical men of those times were in possession of arcana which they employed either in all or at least in most diseases, in a very unprofessional manner, and the efficacy of which the sweet delusions of self-interest did not permit them to call in question. The severe metallic remedies of the Spagyric school, which was then in its infancy, were not yet introduced, but there were not wanting strong heating medicines from the ancient stores of the empyrics, which almost universally obtained the preference over the mild potions and syrups of the Arabians. Hellwetter sold a powder of unknown composition, and a number of distilled waters, which Dr. Magnus Hundt, of Leipzig, notices with much approbation. The pamphlet of this physician is in every respect of the most ordinary kind; it affords no proof that the author had any sound comprehension of the disease, and belongs to that class of low medical compositions which, in times of danger, is so easily derided by the public, and so much diminishes the estimation of the profession, to the material injury of the general welfare.

Almost all the doctors of that time had secret knowledge that they used in a very unprofessional way for nearly all diseases, and their personal interests kept them from questioning its effectiveness. The strong metal-based remedies from the Spagyric school, which was just starting out, hadn’t been introduced yet, but there were plenty of strong heating medicines from the older traditional methods that were preferred over the milder potions and syrups from Arab sources. Hellwetter sold a powder of unknown ingredients and several distilled waters, which Dr. Magnus Hundt from Leipzig praised highly. This physician’s pamphlet is quite ordinary in every way; it doesn't show that the author had a solid understanding of the disease and falls into that category of inferior medical writings that the public easily mocks during times of crisis, which seriously undermines the reputation of the profession and harms public well-being.

It must not, however, be supposed that the people, who in such times of commotion often confound together the good and the bad, listened everywhere so readily to these pamphleteers. The composition of one Dr. Klump, at Ueberlingen, who, on the breaking out of the disease, attacked his patients with theriac and all kinds of heating plague powders, excited great derision[306], and it cannot be denied that the people had on their side, at least occasionally, the advantage of sound sense, as opposed to the endless prescriptions of the physicians, and it is gratifying to observe how this sound sense, which doubtless was guided by respectable medical men, operated in a great many towns to the advantage of those affected.

It shouldn't be assumed that during such chaotic times, people who often confuse good and bad were so quick to listen to these pamphleteers. The work of Dr. Klump in Ueberlingen, who, when the disease broke out, treated his patients with theriac and various aggressively heating plague powders, was met with a lot of mockery[306]. It's undeniable that the public occasionally had the upper hand with common sense compared to the endless prescriptions from physicians. It's encouraging to see how this common sense, likely guided by respected medical professionals, helped many towns benefit those affected.

This is proved by a pamphlet, written in popular language, by a physician in Wittenberg[307], which contains such correct medical views, that our highest approbation is, even now, justly due to its unknown author, as shewing, throughout, great judgment and a very competent knowledge of the Sweating Fever. His 274whole treatment is mild and cautious; he forbids the use of feather beds, but strongly inculcates the necessity of avoiding every kind of chill, and therefore recommends a practice in use at that time, called, “the sewing of the sick,” that is to say, fastening the edge of the bed clothes to the bed with a needle and thread. He orders his patients a moderate quantity of warm but not heating beverage[308], refreshes them with syrup of roses, and impresses upon his readers that the majority of those affected will recover without medicine. In order to guard against the stupor which was so exceedingly fatal, in addition to continual conversation, refreshing odours of rose water and aromatic vinegar were held before the patient’s nose, in a moderately damp cloth, or their temples were cautiously bathed with them. Convalescents were watched with great care, and it is not the least excellence of this very sterling pamphlet that it likewise combated the timidity of the sick with the inculcation of mild, but manly, religious principles, such as corresponded with the spirit of that age. The rules here laid down are, in essentials, the original English precepts which had already broken the force of the epidemic Sweating Sickness in the year 1485, and the author does not conceal his having in this matter received information from Hamburgh, so far back as the 7th of August. That by this mode of treatment not only individual patients[309] were saved, but also that whole cities were protected against any very great mortality, we are willing with the author to believe, and on this account we cannot but lament the more, that the medical science of the rigid schools of those days so completely mistook its office as the guardian of life, and that it caused greater sacrifices by its hazardous remedies than the pestilence would otherwise have occasioned.

This is demonstrated by a pamphlet written in straightforward language by a physician in Wittenberg[307], which contains such accurate medical insights that our highest praise is still deserved by its unknown author, showcasing throughout great judgment and a solid understanding of the Sweating Fever. His 274entire treatment approach is mild and careful; he advises against using feather beds and emphasizes the importance of avoiding any chills, recommending a practice popular at the time called “the sewing of the sick,” meaning securing the edges of the bed covers to the bed with a needle and thread. He prescribes a moderate amount of warm but not overly hot beverages[308], refreshes them with rose syrup, and stresses to his readers that most patients will recover without medication. To prevent the stupor that was so deadly, he suggested maintaining constant conversation and using fresh scents of rose water and aromatic vinegar, held before the patient's nose with a lightly damp cloth, or gently applying them to their temples. Convalescents were monitored closely, and a notable strength of this valuable pamphlet is its encouragement of calm yet forthright religious principles that aligned with the spirit of the time to help combat the fears of the sick. The guidelines here are fundamentally the original English principles that had already diminished the impact of the epidemic Sweating Sickness in 1485, and the author doesn't hide that he received this information from Hamburg as far back as August 7th. We are willing to believe, alongside the author, that this method of treatment not only saved individual patients[309] but also shielded entire cities from significant mortality, which makes it all the more regrettable that the rigid medical schools of that time so completely misunderstood their role as protectors of life, causing more harm with their risky remedies than the plague would have otherwise brought about.

How soon the English treatment met with the recognition which it deserved may be gathered from a Latin composition nearly of the same tenour as the above, and which appears to be an extract from some German pamphlets[310]. Besides aromatic odoriferous waters, the very harmless and only remedies 275therein recommended are pearls and corals given internally by tablespoonfuls in warm rose water. As a prophylactic, treacle, which was in very common use, was recommended to be taken in the juice of roasted onions, but only in very small doses. Similar just views with respect to the excitement of perspiration were also subscribed to by other physicians[311], and finally the great council at Berne, on the 18th of December, published an exhortation to patience and unshaken courage, in which the use of feather beds, and of all medicines, except cinnamon water, was earnestly deprecated[312] during the disease. The court of Holland also recommended a method of cure[313] apparently English, these two documents being the only traces, on the part of any governments, of a paternal solicitude for their subjects.

How quickly the English treatment received the recognition it deserved can be seen from a Latin piece that is quite similar to the one above, which seems to be an excerpt from some German pamphlets[310]. In addition to fragrant herbal waters, the only very safe remedies 275 recommended are pearls and corals taken internally by the tablespoon in warm rose water. As a preventive measure, treacle, which was commonly used, was advised to be taken with the juice of roasted onions, but only in very small amounts. Other physicians[311] also shared similar ideas regarding stimulating perspiration, and finally, the great council at Berne, on December 18th, issued an appeal for patience and steadfast courage, strongly advising against the use of feather beds and all medicines, except for cinnamon water, during the illness. The court of Holland also recommended a method of treatment[313] that appears to be English, with these two documents being the only signs from any governments showing care for their citizens.

The learned and accomplished Euricius Cordus[314], of Marburg, had, when he wrote[315], no information respecting the successful English mode of treatment, and, with all his celebrity, only followed in the ranks of ordinary advisers. He could not free himself from the medical precepts which he brought from Italy and gave to the only patient at Marburg, who was the subject of the Sweating Sickness, the very disagreeable, though much employed potion of “Benedetto.”[316] His prophylactic ordinances were very burthensome, though with respect to the frequent employment of purgatives, which at that time almost all physicians recommended, it must be taken into account, that the intemperance so prevalent in those days, rendered them in general more necessary, perhaps, than they are at the present time. Bishop Ditmar of Merseburg, has betrayed to posterity, that this celebrated man had a great dread of the new disorder, and did not conceal his anxiety[317].

The knowledgeable and accomplished Euricius Cordus[314], from Marburg, when he wrote[315], had no information about the effective English treatment methods and, despite his fame, only followed the usual advice. He couldn't shake off the medical principles he learned in Italy and applied them to the sole patient in Marburg suffering from the Sweating Sickness, using the unpleasant yet commonly used remedy of “Benedetto.”[316] His preventive measures were quite burdensome, though it's important to note that during that time, nearly all physicians recommended frequent purgatives, which were likely more necessary back then due to the rampant intemperance than they are today. Bishop Ditmar of Merseburg has revealed to future generations that this notable man was greatly fearful of the new illness and did not hide his concern[317].

There is still extant a very complicated prescription of Achilles Gasser[318], the learned physician of Augsburg, which he employed with childish confidence[319] during the prevalence of 276the sweating pestilence. We might class this with a thousand others of a similar character, were it not evident how little medical art, at that time in its ancient Greek garb, was suited to the exigency of the age, being dull, inefficient, and long since robbed of its original spirit; for thus alone was it taught in the universities.

There is still a very complicated prescription from Achilles Gasser[318], the knowledgeable doctor from Augsburg, which he used with naive confidence[319] during the outbreak of the sweating sickness. We could group this with a thousand other similar remedies if it weren't clear how inadequate medical practices were at that time, dressed in their ancient Greek form, being slow, ineffective, and long stripped of their original vitality; this was how they were taught in the universities.

In the copious epistle of Simon Riquinus to the Count of Newenar at Cologne[320], traces of better principles are indeed observable, which were soon disseminated from Hamburgh all over Germany, yet the prophylactic measures recommended are not much better than those in use in the time of the Emperor Antoninus, when the Theriaca of Andromachus was among the necessaries at the Roman court. Riquinus incidentally tells a story of a peasant in the neighbourhood of Cleve, who, having become affected by the English Sweating Sickness, crept as quickly as he could into a baker’s oven that was still hot, and after some time, again made his appearance in an exhausted state[321]. This very circumstance proves that the man laboured under only an imaginary and not a real sweating fever, but the belief that the bread which was afterwards baked in this oven was infected with the poison, can only be attributed to the credulity of the learned physician.

In the lengthy letter from Simon Riquinus to the Count of Newenar in Cologne[320], signs of improved ideas are indeed noticeable, which soon spread from Hamburg throughout Germany. However, the preventive measures suggested are not much better than those used during the time of Emperor Antoninus, when the Theriaca of Andromachus was among the essentials at the Roman court. Riquinus casually shares a story about a peasant near Cleve who, after contracting the English Sweating Sickness, quickly crawled into a still-hot baker’s oven. After some time, he emerged in a weakened state[321]. This situation clearly shows that the man only suffered from an imagined rather than an actual sweating fever, but the belief that the bread subsequently baked in that oven was tainted with poison can only be ascribed to the gullibility of the knowledgeable physician.

The Count of Newenar[322] expresses himself on the subject of the sweating fever, like a person well informed, and not unacquainted with medical subjects, and endeavours to prove the critical nature of the sweat by the frequent practice of the empyrics, to throw persons afflicted with the plague, at the very beginning of the attack, into a profuse perspiration[323]. He takes the opportunity to relate of an unprincipled physician, that he freed himself in this manner from the plague, in a public bath, while those who came after him became every one of them affected with the disease and died. According to his account, 277the English Sweating Sickness was by no means fatal in and about Cologne[324], yet we find it with all its original malignity on the banks of the Scheldt, and in the maritime towns of the Netherlands.

The Count of Newenar[322] talks about the sweating fever as someone knowledgeable about the topic and familiar with medical matters. He tries to show how critical the sweat is by mentioning the common practice of using empyrics to induce heavy sweating in people struck by the plague right at the onset of the illness[323]. He takes the chance to share a story about a shady doctor who supposedly cured himself of the plague in a public bath, while everyone who followed him ended up catching the disease and dying. According to his account, 277 the English Sweating Sickness was not particularly deadly in and around Cologne[324], but it was still present with all its original severity along the banks of the Scheldt and in the coastal towns of the Netherlands.

This plainly appears from the pamphlet of a physician in great practice at Ghent, Tertius Damianus, from Vissenaecken, near Tirlemont[325], whose own wife fell sick of the sweating fever, and fortunately was again restored[326]. The cases whereof Damianus gives an account, are among the most marked of which any mention is made, and it also seems, that the disease, contrary to the opinion of many, arose from fear alone, and manifested in the Netherlands a much greater power of contagion than in Germany, to which the hot treatment may have contributed[327]. The manner in which Damianus restrained his patients from indulging in their propensity to sleep, is worthy of notice. When the usual means failed, he directed that their hair should be torn out, that their limbs should be tied together in painful positions, and that vinegar should be dropped into their eyes[328]: the danger justified these means, but violence does not easily attain its end. For the rest, the views of this physician do not differ from those commonly entertained, and if he complains[329] of the great extortions of the apothecaries, this was a natural effect of the customary prescriptions, whereof he himself recommends many that are very objectionable.

This is clearly shown in the pamphlet of a well-known physician in Ghent, Tertius Damianus, from Vissenaecken, near Tirlemont[325], whose own wife got sick with the sweating fever but fortunately recovered[326]. The cases that Damianus describes are some of the most notable mentioned, and it seems that the disease, contrary to what many believe, originated from fear alone, showing a much higher level of contagion in the Netherlands than in Germany, possibly influenced by the aggressive treatment[327]. The way Damianus kept his patients from giving in to their urge to sleep is worth noting. When typical methods failed, he ordered their hair to be pulled out, their limbs to be tied up in painful positions, and vinegar to be dripped into their eyes[328]: the danger justified these actions, but violence doesn't easily achieve its goal. Otherwise, this physician's views are similar to those commonly held, and if he complains[329] about the excessive charges from the apothecaries, it’s a natural result of the usual prescriptions, many of which he himself recommends and are quite questionable.

Whatever the science of medicine of the sixteenth century could oppose to so fearful an enemy, is set forth in the very excellent treatise of Joachim Schiller[330] of Freiburg, which, however, did not appear until two years later, and unfortunately does not give the wished-for information on the development of the pestilence in the Briesgau. Schiller is moderate in his views, and shews throughout, that he is a very well informed physician, and well versed in Greek literature: and although he cannot steer clear of the rubbish of clumsy remedies, yet the 278fault should not be charged on him, but on the age in which he lived. This, like every other, had its evils, and enveloped in clouds and darkness the genius of medicine, which, free, great, and elevated above human short-sightedness, is respected only by the intellectual servants of nature.

Whatever the science of medicine in the sixteenth century could offer against such a terrifying enemy is detailed in the excellent treatise by Joachim Schiller[330] of Freiburg, which, however, was not published until two years later and unfortunately does not provide the desired information on the progression of the plague in the Briesgau. Schiller is moderate in his views and consistently demonstrates that he is a well-informed physician with a solid understanding of Greek literature. Although he cannot completely avoid the ineffective remedies of his time, that fault should not be attributed to him, but rather to the era he lived in. Like any other period, his had its shortcomings, and it obscured the brilliance of medicine, which, when liberated, is great and elevated above human limitations, respected only by the thoughtful advocates of nature.

Sect. 12.—Form of the Disease.

The notions of contemporary writers respecting the phenomena and the course of the sweating epidemic are, it is true, individually unsatisfactory and defective[331]; yet collectively, we may gather from them a lively and complete picture of its effect on the human frame; especially from the German observers, who reported truly and honestly their own, as well as the general experience of their age; for the English had up to that period described little more than the external appearances of this epidemic, which had already attacked them for the fourth time.

The ideas of modern writers about the sweating epidemic and its effects are, admittedly, lacking and flawed[331]; however, when we put them together, they provide a vivid and comprehensive view of its impact on the human body. This is especially true for the German observers, who accurately and honestly reported both their own experiences and those of their time. In contrast, the English had mainly only described the outward signs of this epidemic, which had already struck them for the fourth time.

It is ascertained that the Sweating Fever was in general very inflammatory; and, leaving out of the account its sequel, came to a crisis at most in four and twenty hours; yet, within this narrow limit as to time, very various symptoms occurred[332], so that by a more exact observation than could be expected from the physicians of those days, several gradations of its development and violence might have been distinguished from each other. Thus one form of this disease appeared that was wanting in precisely that symptom which was the most essential, namely, the colliquative sweating[333], (as in the most dangerous form of cholera, neither vomiting nor purging takes place,) and which, by its overpowering attack, either destroyed life within a few hours, or perhaps took some other turn of a nature unknown to us.

It is clear that the Sweating Fever was generally very inflammatory; and excluding its aftermath, it reached a peak in usually no more than twenty-four hours; yet, within this short time frame, a wide range of symptoms occurred[332], so that with more precise observation than what could be expected from the physicians of that time, several stages of its progression and severity could have been identified. Thus, one form of this disease appeared that lacked exactly that symptom which was the most crucial, namely, the colliquative sweating[333], (similar to the most severe form of cholera, where neither vomiting nor diarrhea occurs,) and which, through its overwhelming onset, either caused death within a few hours or perhaps took some other turn that we do not fully understand.

Premonitory symptoms were wanting altogether, unless we may reckon as such, first, an anguish, combined with palpitation of the heart, which may not have been of corporeal origin, but may 279have proceeded from the general alarm; or secondly, an irresistible sinking of the powers resembling a swoon, which, perhaps, preceded the disorder, in the same manner as it had preceded the general eruption of the plague in northern Germany[334]: or thirdly, rheumatic pains of various kinds, which were frequently felt in the summer of 1529[335]; or finally, a disagreeable taste in the mouth and foul breath, which were very commonly the subject of complaint at that time[336].

Premonitory symptoms were completely absent, unless we consider first, a sense of dread combined with a racing heart, which might not have been physical but could have come from the overall anxiety; or second, an overwhelming weakness that felt similar to fainting, which maybe occurred before the illness, just like it had occurred before the widespread outbreak of the plague in northern Germany[334]: or third, various kinds of rheumatic pain that were often experienced during the summer of 1529[335]; or finally, an unpleasant taste in the mouth and bad breath, which were very common complaints at that time[336].

In most instances the disease set in like the generality of fevers, with a short shivering fit[337] and trembling, which in very malignant cases even passed into convulsions of the extremities[338]; in many it began with a moderate and constantly increasing heat[339] either without any evident occasion, even in the midst of sleep, so that the patients on waking lay in a state of perspiration, or from a state of intoxication, and during hard work[340], especially in the morning at sunrise[341]. Many patients experienced at the commencement a disagreeable creeping sensation or formication on their hands and feet[342], which passed into pricking pains, and an exceedingly painful sensation under the nails. At times likewise it was combined with rheumatic cramps, and with such a weariness in the upper part of the body, that the sufferers were totally incapable of raising their arms[343]. Some were seen during these attacks, especially women and those who were weak, with their hands and feet swollen[344].

In most cases, the disease started like typical fevers, with a brief shivering spell[337] and trembling, which in very severe cases even turned into convulsions in the limbs[338]; for many, it began with a moderate and steadily increasing fever[339] without any obvious reason, even during sleep, causing patients to wake up drenched in sweat, or due to intoxication and strenuous work[340], especially in the early morning at sunrise[341]. Many patients initially felt an unpleasant tingling sensation or pins and needles in their hands and feet[342], which developed into sharp pains and a very painful feeling under the nails. Sometimes it was also accompanied by rheumatic cramps and such extreme fatigue in the upper body that the sufferers couldn't raise their arms[343]. Some were observed during these episodes, particularly women and those who were weak, with swollen hands and feet[344].

Serious affections of the brain quickly followed; many fell into a state of violent feverish delirium[345], and these generally died[346]. All complained of obscure pain in the head[347]; and it was not 280long before an alarming lethargy supervened[348], which, if it was not firmly resisted, led to inevitable death by apoplexy. Thus the unconscious sufferers were, at least, relieved from the pain of separation from their friends, which would have been much more distressing to them in this than in any other complaint, since they lay, as it were, in a stinking swamp, tortured with suffering.

Serious brain issues quickly followed; many fell into a state of violent feverish delirium[345], and most of them died[346]. All complained of vague pain in the head[347]; and it wasn't long before an alarming lethargy set in[348], which, if not firmly resisted, led to certain death by apoplexy. Therefore, the unconscious sufferers were, at least, spared the pain of being separated from their friends, which would have been much more distressing for them in this condition than in any other, as they lay, so to speak, in a foul swamp, tortured with suffering.

This mortal anguish accompanied them so long as they were in possession of their senses, throughout the whole disease[349]. In many the countenance was bloated and livid, or at least the lips and cavities of the eyes were of a leaden tint; whence it evidently appears, that the passage of the blood through the lungs was obstructed in the same way as in violent asthma[350]; hence they breathed with great difficulty, as if their lungs were seized with a violent spasm or incipient paralysis; at the same time, the heart trembled and palpitated constantly under the oppressive feeling of inward burning, which, in the most malignant cases, flew to the head, and excited fatal delirium[351]. In the course of a short time, and in many cases at the very commencement, the stinking sweat broke out in streams over the whole body, either proving salutary when life was able to obtain the mastery over the disease, or prejudicial when it was subdued by it—as is the case in every ineffectual effort of nature to produce a cure. And in this respect, as in diseases of less importance, great differences appeared according to the constitution of the patient; for some perspired very easily, others, on the contrary, with great difficulty, especially the phlegmatic, who, in consequence, were threatened with the greatest danger[352].

This intense suffering stayed with them as long as they were aware, throughout the entire illness[349]. In many, the face was swollen and discolored, or at least the lips and eye sockets had a grayish hue; from this, it was clear that blood flow through the lungs was blocked similarly to severe asthma[350]; as a result, they struggled to breathe, as if their lungs were experiencing a powerful spasm or early paralysis; at the same time, the heart shook and raced continuously under the heavy feeling of internal burning, which, in the worst cases, reached the head and caused deadly delirium[351]. Shortly afterward, and in many instances right from the start, foul sweat poured out in streams all over the body, either being beneficial when life managed to overcome the illness, or harmful when it was defeated by the disease—as seen in every unsuccessful attempt by nature to achieve a cure. In this regard, as in less severe illnesses, significant differences emerged based on the patient's constitution; some sweated very easily, while others, especially the phlegmatic, struggled greatly to perspire, and as a result, faced the greatest danger[352].

In this severe struggle the spinal marrow was sometimes, at a later stage, so much affected, that even convulsions came on; and it happened not unfrequently, that, in consequence of the 281constriction of the chest, the stomach indicated its excited condition by nausea and vomiting[353]. These symptoms, however, manifested themselves principally in those who were attacked with the disease upon a full stomach.

In this severe struggle, the spinal cord was sometimes, at a later stage, so affected that even convulsions occurred; and it often happened that, due to the 281constriction of the chest, the stomach showed its irritated state through nausea and vomiting[353]. These symptoms primarily appeared in those who faced the illness on a full stomach.

Such is the testimony of the contemporary writers of 1529, to whose accounts but little is added by Kaye, an English eye-witness of the epidemic Sweating Sickness of 1551. The observations of this perfectly trustworthy physician, so far as they relate to the form of the disorder, may be here annexed, since no essential differences between the diseases on these two occasions can be discovered. At the first onset the disease in some attacked the neck or shoulders, and in others one leg or one arm, with dragging pains[354]; others felt at the same time a warm glow that spread itself over the limbs, immediately after which, without any visible cause, the perspiration broke out, accompanied by constant and increasing heat of the inward parts, gradually extending towards the surface. The patients suffered from a very quick and irritable pulse[355] and great thirst, and threw themselves about in the utmost restlessness. Under the violent headache which they suffered, they frequently fell into a talkative state of wandering, yet this did not generally happen before the ninth hour, and in very various gradations of mental aberration[356], after which the drowsiness commenced. In others the sweating was longer delayed, while, in the mean time, a slight rigor of the limbs existed: it then broke out profusely, but did not always trickle down the skin in equal abundance, but alternately, sometimes more, sometimes less. It was thick and of various colours, but in all cases of a very disagreeable odour[357], which, when it broke out again, after any interruption to its flow, was still more penetrating[358].

Such is the account from contemporary writers of 1529, with little additional insight provided by Kaye, an English eyewitness of the epidemic Sweating Sickness in 1551. The observations of this reliable physician, particularly regarding the nature of the illness, can be included here since no significant differences between the two outbreaks can be found. At the onset, the illness affected some individuals in the neck or shoulders, while others experienced pain in one leg or arm. Some felt a warm sensation spreading through their limbs, followed by sweat breaking out without any apparent cause, accompanied by constant and increasing heat from within, gradually moving to the surface. Patients had a very quick and irritable pulse and intense thirst, and they tossed and turned in extreme restlessness. Under the severe headache they experienced, they often entered a talkative yet confused state, although this typically didn't happen until around the ninth hour, presenting various degrees of mental disorientation, after which drowsiness set in. In some cases, the sweating was delayed, while a slight chill affected the limbs; then it would break out profusely, but not always uniformly on the skin—sometimes less and sometimes more. It was thick and of different colors, but in every case had a very unpleasant smell, which became even more intense if it started again after pausing.

282

282

Kaye adds to what we already know of the oppression of the chest, the very important statement that those affected were observed to have a whining, sighing voice, whence we have every reason to conclude that there was a serious affection of the eighth pair of nerves. He, moreover, describes a very mild form of the disease, such as was prevalent in the south of Germany in 1529. It passed off under proper care, without any danger, in the very short period of fifteen hours, and was brought to a termination by moderate heat through the medium of a very gentle perspiration[359].

Kaye adds to what we already know about the oppression of the chest with the important observation that those affected were noted to have a whining, sighing voice, leading us to reasonably conclude that there was a serious issue with the eighth pair of nerves. He also describes a very mild form of the disease that was common in southern Germany in 1529. It resolved quickly with proper care, without any danger, in just fifteen hours, and was brought to an end by moderate heat through gentle sweating[359].

It is remarkable that during this violent disorder neither the activity of the kidneys nor the evacuation by stool was entirely interrupted, for there passed continually turbid and dark urine, although, as may be conceived, in small quantity and with great uncertainty as to the prognosis; whereupon those physicians who judged by the urine were not a little perplexed[360]. It was observed, too, sometimes in the more easily curable cases, that patients at the moment when the perspiration broke out upon them passed urine in great quantity[361], on which account a French physician proposed to draw off the water in those who suffered from this disease[362]; yet this practice has no higher therapeutical worth than the excitement of perspiration in diabetes or in cholera, and is, moreover, much less practicable. That occasionally diarrhœa supervened, and even to a degree which was not to be restrained, may be gathered from the frequent medical directions as to how it ought to be arrested, which Kaye also repeats[363]. In some patients, likewise, nature appears to have effected a simultaneous crisis by the skin, the kidneys, and the bowels.

It's impressive that during this chaotic period, neither the function of the kidneys nor the ability to have bowel movements was completely stopped. There was a continuous output of cloudy and dark urine, although, as you can imagine, it was in small amounts and very unpredictable regarding the outcome; this left those doctors who relied on urine analysis quite confused[360]. It was also noted that, in some of the easier cases, patients would often urinate a lot just as they began to sweat[361], which led a French doctor to suggest draining the excess fluid from those suffering from this illness[362]; however, this approach has no greater therapeutic value than stimulating sweating in diabetes or cholera, and is also much less feasible. The occurrence of diarrhea, sometimes to a level that couldn't be controlled, is evident from the frequent medical advice on how to manage it, which Kaye also mentions[363]. In some patients, it seems that nature was able to initiate a simultaneous resolution through the skin, kidneys, and intestines.

Much more important, however, is the observation of a respectable Dutch physician, that after the perspiration was over there appeared on the limbs small vesicles[364], which were not confluent, 283but rendered the skin uneven, and these were not noticed by any other medical observer, but are spoken of by the author of an old Hamburgh chronicle, and, with this addition, that they had been seen on the dead[365]. By these it is very likely that a miliary eruption, and perhaps spots also, are to be understood; yet every thing militates against the supposition that this phenomenon was constant, or that the Sweating Fever was an eruptive disorder[366]. For in that case, some mention would have been made of it in the numerous accounts of historians, many of whom, doubtless, had themselves seen the disease, and the eruptions would have been more evidently and decidedly formed in the numerous relapses of those who recovered. They certainly indicate a relationship with the miliary fever, but only in so far as that both diseases are of rheumatic origin, and this slight participation in the nature of an eruptive disease would seem to have been observed in the English Sweating Sickness only in perfectly isolated cases. What would have taken place under such an indication had the Sweating Sickness run a longer course, whether, in fact, it might not possibly have passed into a regular miliary fever, is a question unsolved by the past, since even later transitions of this kind have never been observed. The two diseases are, both in their course and their nature, perfectly distinct from each other, and the miliary fever was not developed as an independent epidemic until the following century, under circumstances altogether different, and its more decided precursors are not to be discovered until a period posterior to the five eruptions of the Sweating Sickness.

However, what’s even more significant is the observation from a respectable Dutch physician that after the sweating ended, small blisters[364] appeared on the limbs, which were not connected, 283 but made the skin uneven. These were not noticed by any other medical observer but were mentioned by the author of an old Hamburg chronicle, with the added note that they had been seen on the dead[365]. It’s very likely that this refers to a miliary rash, and possibly spots as well; however, everything points against the idea that this was a common occurrence or that the Sweating Fever was a rash-related illness[366]. If it were, it would have likely been mentioned in the many accounts by historians, many of whom surely witnessed the disease themselves, and the rashes would have appeared more clearly and consistently during the many relapses of those who recovered. They do indicate a connection to the miliary fever, but only to the extent that both diseases have a rheumatic origin, and this slight resemblance to a rash-related illness seems to have only been observed in completely isolated cases of the English Sweating Sickness. What might have happened if the Sweating Sickness had lasted longer, whether it could have developed into a typical miliary fever, remains unanswered by history, since later transitions of this kind have never been seen again. The two illnesses are entirely distinct in both their progression and nature, and miliary fever did not emerge as an independent epidemic until the following century, under completely different circumstances, with its more definite precursors not appearing until after the five outbreaks of the Sweating Sickness.

The powers of the constitution were much shaken by the Sweating Sickness, so that a rapid recovery was observed to take place only in the mildest form of this disease. Those, however, whom it attacked more severely, remained very feeble and powerless for at least a week, and their restoration was but gradual, 284and effected only by great care and strengthening diet. After the perspiration had passed off, the patient was taken carefully from his bed, cautiously dried in a warm chamber, placed by the fireside, and, as a first restorative, usually fed with egg soup, yet the generality could not entirely get over the effects of the fever for a long time. Those who had recovered could seldom go out so early as the second or third day[367].

The constitution's powers were heavily impacted by the Sweating Sickness, so recovery was only seen in the mildest cases of the disease. Those who experienced more severe symptoms remained very weak and powerless for at least a week, with their recovery being slow, 284and achieved only through careful treatment and a nutritious diet. After the excessive sweating had subsided, the patient was gently taken from their bed, carefully dried in a warm room, positioned by the fire, and as a first step toward recovery, usually given egg soup. However, most could not fully overcome the effects of the fever for a long time. Those who had recovered rarely felt well enough to go out as early as the second or third day[367].

Those patients were placed in still greater danger in whom the perspiration was in any way suppressed: most of them were consigned to inevitable death, (the popular voice ever since the year 1485 confirms this.) Over those, however, in whom the powers of life were roused to a renewed effort, there broke out, after a short period, a new perspiration far more offensive than the first; so that the body dripped as it were with a foul fluid, and it seemed as if the inward parts wanted to disburthen themselves at once of their putridity by an immoderate effort[368]. It is clear that this repetition of the attack must have been destructive to many who, had it not been for an obstruction of the crisis, would have been saved; for nothing is more dangerous in inflammatory diseases than when those secretions are interrupted which Nature has ordained as the only means of relief.

Those patients were put in even greater danger when their sweating was in any way stopped: most of them were doomed to die, (the common belief has supported this since 1485.) However, for those whose vital signs were stimulated to make a renewed effort, a new, much worse sweat broke out after a short time; it caused the body to drip with a foul fluid, as if the internal parts wanted to rid themselves of their rot through an excessive effort[368]. It's obvious that this repeated attack must have been lethal for many who, if not for an obstruction of the crisis, could have been saved; because nothing is more dangerous in inflammatory diseases than when those secretions are interrupted that Nature has designated as the only means of relief.

Relapses were frequent, because convalescents, after the disease was subdued, remained for a long time very excitable. These were seen for the third and fourth time seized with the Sweating Sickness[369], nay, later writers notice a repetition of the disease even to the twelfth time[370], whereby at least the health was completely shattered, for dropsy or some other destructive sequelæ supervened, until death put a period to incurable sufferings, and it is important to observe that even the bowels participated in the great excitability of the system, for too early an exposure to the air easily brought on diarrhœa[371].

Relapses were common because, after the illness was brought under control, patients remained very agitated for a long time. They were observed having the third and fourth episodes of the Sweating Sickness[369], and later writers noted recurrences of the illness even up to the twelfth time[370], which completely undermined their health, as conditions like dropsy or other severe complications set in until death finally ended their unbearable suffering. It’s also important to note that even the digestive system showed signs of this heightened excitability, as exposing themselves to the air too soon easily triggered diarrhœa[371].

How great the decomposition of the organic matter was is convincingly proved from all the testimony hitherto adduced, 285but it might have been inferred from the very rapid putrefaction of the body, which rendered it necessary everywhere to use the greatest despatch in the performance of burials[372]; and fortunately did away with all fear of being buried alive. Of post mortem examinations we have no information, and even if they could have been instituted, they would, from the manner of conducting researches in those times, scarcely have thrown any important light on the disease. Hardly any physicians but those who had studied in Italy knew the inward structure of the body from their own observation, superficial as it was; the rest learned it only from Galenic manuals; how could they with such slender knowledge have distinguished between healthy and diseased parts? Moreover, the Sweating Sickness could not in so short a period cause such a palpable and substantial destruction of the viscera as they would alone have sought for. Details respecting the condition of the blood in the dead body, which after such an enormous loss of watery fluid, such severe oppression at the chest, and so great an impediment to the function of respiration, would in all probability be thickened and darkened in colour, as well as respecting the condition of the lungs and of the heart, it would be highly desirable to obtain; but these likewise are wanting altogether, and after the lapse of so long a period there only remains room for conjectures.

The extent of the decomposition of organic matter is convincingly supported by all the evidence presented so far, 285 but it could have been inferred from the very rapid decay of the body, which made it crucial to carry out burials quickly everywhere, A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__; and fortunately eliminated all fear of being buried alive. We have no information about post-mortem examinations, and even if they could have been conducted, the way research was done back then wouldn't have shed much light on the disease. Barely any physicians besides those who studied in Italy had firsthand knowledge of the body's internal structure, which was only superficial; the rest learned it only from Galenic textbooks; how could they distinguish between healthy and diseased parts with such limited knowledge? Furthermore, the Sweating Sickness couldn't cause such noticeable and severe damage to the organs in such a short time. It would have been very useful to know the condition of the blood in the deceased, which, after such a significant loss of fluid, along with severe pressure in the chest and major difficulty breathing, would likely have been thickened and dark in color, as well as details about the state of the lungs and heart; unfortunately, this information is completely missing, and after such a long time, only speculation remains.

The observation was repeated in Germany which had been so frequently made since the year 1485, that the middle period of life was especially exposed to the Sweating Fever. Children, on the contrary, remained almost entirely exempt from this disease, and when the aged were affected by it, it was as individual exceptions to a general rule[373], and this as it would appear, only during the height of the epidemic; as for example at Zwickau, where a woman of 112 years of age was carried off by it[374]. We have already in part discovered the cause of this perfectly constant phenomenon in the luxurious mode of living of robust young men, and if we look back to the moral condition of the Germans in the 16th century, we find among 286them the same immoderate luxury as among the English, the same drunkenness, the same intemperance at their frequent banquets, where the wine-cups and beer-jugs were emptied with but too eager draughts; finally, also, the same relaxation of skin consequent upon the use of warm baths and warm clothing. All contemporary writers mention these circumstances[375], and our bold forefathers, with respect to these matters, were not in the best repute with their southern neighbours.

The observation that has been often noted in Germany since 1485 is that middle-aged people were particularly vulnerable to the Sweating Fever. Children, on the other hand, were almost completely unaffected by this disease, and when older individuals did contract it, they were rare exceptions to a general trend[373], and usually only during the peak of the epidemic; for instance, in Zwickau, a 112-year-old woman succumbed to it[374]. We have partially identified the cause of this consistently observed phenomenon in the extravagant lifestyles of strong young men. If we look at the moral state of the Germans in the 16th century, we see the same excessive luxury as in the English, the same level of drunkenness, and the same indulgence at their frequent feasts, where wine and beer were consumed in large amounts; finally, there was also the same loosening of the skin due to warm baths and heavy clothing. All contemporary writers mention these factors[375], and our bold ancestors, with regard to these behaviors, were not held in high regard by their southern neighbors.

But we have, moreover, to survey the disease in another point of view, namely, in relation to its peculiar character. In the outset we designated the Sweating Sickness as a rheumatic fever, and if we take the notion of a rheumatic affection, as in propriety we ought, in its widest acceptation, weighty and convincing grounds have been adduced in the course of our whole inquiry in confirmation of this view. When we observe that those very nations were visited by the Sweating Fever, which are characterized by a fair skin, blue eyes, and light hair—the marks of the German race, it may with justice be assumed, that even this peculiarity in the structure of the body rendered it susceptible of this extraordinary disease. It is this which causes the proneness to fluxes of all kinds, and which makes these diseases endemic in the north of Europe, whilst the dark-haired southern nations and the blacks in the tropical climates remain, under similar circumstances[376], more free from them. If it be remembered further how overcharged with water were the lower strata of the atmosphere in which the pestilent Sweating Fevers existed, what thick and even offensive mists prepared the way for the disease and indicated its approach, what rapid alternations of freezing cold and excessive heat took place in the summer of 1529; and, moreover, how frequent all kinds of fluxes were in this very year, the complete form of the rheumatic constitution will be recognised in every individual feature.

But we also need to look at the disease from another perspective, specifically regarding its unique characteristics. At the beginning, we called the Sweating Sickness a rheumatic fever, and if we consider the idea of a rheumatic condition, as we rightly should, there have been significant and compelling arguments made throughout our research to support this idea. When we see that the nations affected by the Sweating Fever share traits like fair skin, blue eyes, and light hair—typical of the German race—it’s reasonable to suggest that this physical characteristic made them more vulnerable to this unusual disease. This vulnerability contributes to the tendency toward various ailments, leading to these diseases being common in northern Europe, while darker-haired southern nations and black populations in tropical regions remain, under similar conditions, less affected. If we also recall how saturated with moisture the lower layers of the atmosphere were during the time of the deadly Sweating Fevers, how dense and even foul mists signaled the disease's arrival, and how there were rapid shifts between freezing cold and intense heat in the summer of 1529, along with the frequency of all types of illnesses that year, the complete picture of the rheumatic condition will become clear in every detail.

Did we possess in the showy systems of modern times a maturer knowledge of the electricity of living bodies, much light would of necessity hence be thrown on the great object of our research. We should not then be compelled to rest satisfied 287with the fact that a cloudy atmosphere abstracts electricity from the body, robs the skin and lungs of their electrical atmosphere, disturbs their mutual electrical relation with the external world, and by this disturbance prepares the body for rheumatic indisposition, with all that peculiar decomposition of the fluids, irritable tension of the nerves, fever, and painful affection of particular parts, with which it is accompanied. If this disturbance be represented according to certain new and inviting hypotheses, supported by some important facts[377], as being perhaps an accumulation of electricity in the interior of the body, owing to a morbid, isolating activity of the skin, we may expect a more perfect knowledge of the nature of rheumatism through the medium of future diligent researches; and until these be made, some evident signs of connexion between rheumatic affections and the English Sweating Sickness will perhaps be sufficient to demonstrate the rheumatic nature of this latter disease.

If we had a deeper understanding of the electricity in living bodies in today's advanced systems, it would shed a lot of light on our main research objective. We wouldn’t have to be content with the idea that a cloudy atmosphere takes electricity away from the body, strips the skin and lungs of their electrical aura, disrupts their electrical connection with the outside world, and makes the body more prone to rheumatic issues, along with all the specific breakdown of fluids, nerve sensitivity, fever, and pain in certain areas that comes with it. If this disruption is explained through some new and intriguing theories, backed by significant facts, as potentially being an accumulation of electricity inside the body due to a harmful isolating action of the skin, we might anticipate a clearer understanding of rheumatism through future in-depth studies. Until then, some clear links between rheumatic issues and the English Sweating Sickness might be enough to prove the rheumatic nature of this latter illness.

In the first place, the very great susceptibility of those affected with the Sweating Fever to every change of temperature—the decidedly great danger of chill. In no known disease does this irritability of the skin shew itself in so prominent a degree as in rheumatic fevers and in those non-febrile fluxes in which there even exists a very evident sensitiveness to metallic action.

In the first place, the extreme sensitivity of those suffering from the Sweating Fever to any change in temperature—the significantly high risk of getting chilled. No other known illness shows this skin irritability as prominently as rheumatic fevers and those non-febrile conditions where there is a clear sensitivity to metallic influence.

Secondly, The tendency of the rheumatic diathesis to come to a crisis through the medium of a profuse, sour and offensive perspiration without any assistance from art[378]. The English Sweating Sickness manifests this commotion of the organism in the most exquisite form hitherto known; for it admits of no kind of doubt that the sweat in this disease was of itself, and in itself, critical, in the fullest acceptation of the term.

Secondly, The tendency of the rheumatic condition to hit a breaking point through excessive, sour, and foul-smelling sweat without any medical help[378]. The English Sweating Sickness shows this disturbance in the body in the most remarkable way known so far; because there’s no doubt that the sweat in this illness was, on its own, and in itself, critical, in every sense of the word.

288

288

Thirdly, The peculiar alteration in the fundamental composition of organic matter in rheumatic diseases, in consequence of which volatile acids of a strange odour are prevalent in the sweat, and urine, and animal excretions. The English Sweating Sickness exhibits also this result of morbid activity in a greater and more striking manner than any other disease. Nor can we regard the tendency to putridity, which has been observed, as any thing but an increased degree of this condition.

Thirdly, The unusual change in the basic makeup of organic matter in rheumatic diseases leads to the presence of volatile acids with a strange smell in sweat, urine, and animal waste. The English Sweating Sickness shows this effect of illness more clearly and dramatically than any other disease. We cannot see the tendency toward decay that has been observed as anything other than a heightened state of this condition.

Fourthly, The shooting pains in the limbs, the most decided sign of rheumatism, were not wanting in the English Sweating Sickness; nay, they became developed even to the extent of an incipient paralysis, and even the convulsions of those affected with this disease may not unjustly be attributed to the same source.

Fourthly, The shooting pains in the limbs, the most obvious sign of rheumatism, were present in the English Sweating Sickness; in fact, they even progressed to the point of early paralysis, and the convulsions experienced by those affected by this disease can rightly be linked to the same cause.

Fifthly, The tendency of rheumatism when it takes an unfavourable course to pass into regular dropsy, which is a consequence of the peculiar decomposition, manifested itself in the Sweating Fever in so marked a manner that the dropsy itself gradually destroyed the patient.

Fifthly, The tendency of rheumatism, when it takes a bad turn, to develop into full-blown dropsy, which results from the unique breakdown of the body, was clearly evident in the Sweating Fever, to the point where the dropsy itself slowly led to the patient's demise.

Should the sceptical still need another link in the comparison, we may adduce the miliary fever, a disease of decidedly rheumatic character. We must not, however, take as our standard the degenerate forms of miliary fever existing in modern times, but those grand and fully developed forms of the disease which occurred in the 17th and 18th centuries, and in which we find a similar odour in the perspiration, the same oppression, and the same inexpressible anguish, with palpitation and restlessness. The arms became enfeebled as if seized with paralysis, violent pains of the limbs set in, and unpleasant pricking sensations in the fingers and toes, resembling in all these particulars the Sweating Sickness, only pursuing a more lengthened and irregular course, and becoming developed altogether in a different manner.

If skeptics still need another comparison, we can bring up miliary fever, a disease that has a distinctly rheumatic nature. However, we shouldn't use the degenerated forms of miliary fever seen today as our benchmark, but rather the classic, fully developed versions of the disease that appeared in the 17th and 18th centuries. These forms exhibited a similar smell in the sweat, the same sense of oppression, and the same indescribable pain, along with palpitations and restlessness. The arms became weak as if paralyzed, intense pain radiated through the limbs, and there were uncomfortable tingling sensations in the fingers and toes, resembling the Sweating Sickness in many ways, but following a longer and more irregular course, developing in a completely different manner.

According to this representation, the English Sweating Sickness appears as a rheumatic fever in the most exquisite form that has ever yet been seen in the world, violently affecting the vitality of the brain and spinal marrow with their nerves, without, however, at all molesting the plexuses of the abdomen. The immoderate excretion of watery fluid, which in the mild cases alone took place, through a spontaneous curative power, while in the malignant forms it betokened paralysis of the vessels 289and an actual colliquation, directs our attention further to the consequent state of inanition, which very probably passed into a stagnation of the circulation, in the same manner as takes place after every other sudden loss of the fluids, whether from sanguineous effusion or evacuations by vomit and stool. Hence the uncommonly rapid course of the disease, and partly, too, the fatal stupor[379]; hence, likewise, the very pardonable misconception with respect to the nature of the Sweating Fever existing even in more modern times. The sequela was more important and more fatal than the original rheumatic affection itself, which in its minor forms was mild and easily managed.

According to this representation, the English Sweating Sickness looks like a severe form of rheumatic fever like no other in the world, severely impacting the health of the brain and spinal cord along with their nerves, without bothering the abdominal plexuses at all. The excessive loss of watery fluid, which only happened in milder cases due to a natural healing power, while in severe cases indicated paralysis of the vessels 289 and actual breakdown, draws our attention to the resulting state of weakness, which likely led to a stagnation of blood flow, similar to what happens after any sudden loss of fluids, whether from bleeding or through vomiting and diarrhea. This explains the unusually rapid progression of the disease, and also contributes to the deadly stupor. This also accounts for the understandable misconceptions about the nature of the Sweating Fever that persisted even in more modern times. The aftereffects were more significant and more deadly than the initial rheumatic symptoms, which in their milder forms were manageable and not severe.

And thus is explained the wonderfully fortunate result of the old English treatment, which prevented this sequela, and avoided increasing the already too powerful efforts of nature to effect a cure. We have, therefore, nothing further to add to this judicious and truly scientific practice but our unqualified approbation; for it is the part of the physician, in diseases which have a spontaneous power of curing themselves, to leave this power free scope to act, and merely by fostering care to remove all obstacles to its exercise. Should it be the destiny of mankind to be again visited by the disease of the sixteenth century, (and it is by no means impossible that at some time or other similar events may recur,) we would recommend our posterity to bear in mind this eternal truth, and to treasure up the golden words of the Wittenberg pamphlet, namely, to guard the healing art from strange and unnatural farragos, for it is only when it is subordinate to nature that it bears the stamp of reason—the mistress of all earthly things.

And so we explain the incredibly fortunate outcome of the traditional English treatment, which prevented this aftereffect and avoided pushing the already strong natural efforts to achieve a cure. Therefore, we have nothing more to add to this wise and genuinely scientific practice other than our full approval; because it’s the doctor’s role, in diseases that can heal on their own, to allow that power the freedom to operate, and simply by providing supportive care to remove any barriers to its function. If humanity is destined to face the disease of the sixteenth century again (and it's certainly possible that similar events may happen in the future), we would advise our descendants to remember this timeless truth and to value the important words of the Wittenberg pamphlet, namely, to protect the healing profession from strange and unnatural mixtures, because it is only when it is in line with nature that it carries the mark of reason—the master of all earthly matters.


290

CHAPTER V.
Fifth Outbreak of the Disease—1551.


“Ubique lugubris erat lamentatio, fletus mœrens, acerbus luctus.”
Kaye.

Sect. 1.—Eruption.

Full three and twenty years had now elapsed; no trace of the Sweating Sickness had shewn itself anywhere in this long interval, and England had by its rapid advancement assumed quite another aspect[380] when the old enemy of that people again, and for the last time, burst forth in Shrewsbury, the capital of Shropshire[381]. Here, during the spring, there arose impenetrable fogs from the banks of the Severn, which, from their unusually bad odour, led to a fear of their injurious consequences[382]. It was not long before the Sweating Sickness suddenly broke out on the 15th of April. To many it was entirely unknown or but obscurely recollected; for, amidst the commotions of Henry’s reign, the old malady had long since been forgotten.

Full twenty-three years had passed; no sign of the Sweating Sickness had appeared during this long time, and England had changed significantly with its rapid progress[380] when the old foe of the people reemerged in Shrewsbury, the capital of Shropshire[381]. Here, during the spring, thick fogs rose from the banks of the Severn, which, due to their unusually bad smell, caused fear of their harmful effects[382]. It wasn’t long before the Sweating Sickness unexpectedly broke out on April 15th. For many, it was completely unfamiliar or only vaguely remembered; amid the turmoil of Henry’s reign, the old disease had been long forgotten.

The visitation was so very general in Shrewsbury and the places in its neighbourhood, that every one must have believed that the atmosphere was poisoned, for no caution availed, no closing of the doors and windows, every individual dwelling became an hospital, and the aged and the young, who could contribute nothing towards the care of their relatives, alone remained unaffected by the pestilence[383]. The disease came as unexpectedly and as completely without all warning as it had ever done on former occasions; at table, during sleep, on journeys, in the midst of amusement, and at all times of the day; and so little had it lost of its old malignity, that in a few hours it 291summoned some of its victims from the ranks of the living, and even destroyed others in less than one[384]. Four and twenty hours, neither more nor less, were decisive as to the event; the disease had thus undergone no change.

The outbreak was so widespread in Shrewsbury and the nearby areas that everyone must have thought the air was toxic, as no precautions helped. Closing doors and windows didn't work; every home turned into a hospital, and only the elderly and young, who couldn’t help take care of their family, were unaffected by the plague[383]. The disease arrived as suddenly and completely as it had in the past; at dinner, during sleep, while traveling, in the middle of fun, and at all times of day. It hadn’t lost any of its old viciousness, as in just a few hours it 291took some victims from among the living and even killed others in less than an hour[384]. Twenty-four hours, no more, no less, were decisive for the outcome; the disease had not changed at all.

In proportion as the pestilence increased in its baneful violence, the condition of the people became more and more miserable and forlorn; the townspeople fled to the country, the peasants to the towns; some sought lonely places of refuge, others shut themselves up in their houses. Ireland and Scotland received crowds of the fugitives. Others embarked for France or the Netherlands; but security was nowhere to be found; so that people at last resigned themselves to that fate which had so long and heavily oppressed the country. Women ran about negligently clad, as if they had lost their senses, and filled the streets with lamentations and loud prayers; all business was at a stand; no one thought of his daily occupations, and the funeral bells tolled day and night, as if all the living ought to be reminded of their near and inevitable end[385]. There died, within a few days, nine hundred and sixty of the inhabitants of Shrewsbury, the greater part of them robust men and heads of families; from which circumstance we may judge of the profound sorrow that was felt in this city.

As the plague grew more violent, the people's situation became increasingly miserable and hopeless; townspeople fled to the countryside, while peasants moved to the towns. Some sought out remote places to hide, while others locked themselves in their homes. Ireland and Scotland took in many of the refugees. Others set sail for France or the Netherlands, but safety was nowhere to be found, and eventually, people resigned themselves to the fate that had long weighed heavily on the country. Women ran through the streets dressed carelessly, as if they had lost their minds, filling the air with cries and frantic prayers. Business ground to a halt; no one attended to their daily tasks, and funeral bells rang day and night, as if it were a reminder to all the living of their impending end[385]. In just a few days, nine hundred sixty residents of Shrewsbury died, most of them strong men and heads of families, which gives us an idea of the deep sorrow felt in this city.

Sect. 2.—Extension and Duration.

The epidemic spread itself rapidly over all England, as far as the Scottish borders, and on all sides to the sea coasts, under more extraordinary and memorable phenomena than had been observed in almost any other epidemic. In fact, it seemed that the banks of the Severn were the focus of the malady, and that from hence, a true impestation of the atmosphere was diffused in every direction. Whithersoever the winds wafted the stinking mist, the inhabitants became infected with the Sweating Sickness, and, more or less, the same scenes of horror and of affliction which had occurred in Shrewsbury were repeated. These poisonous clouds of mist were observed moving from place to place, with the disease in their train, affecting one town after another, and morning and evening 292spreading their nauseating insufferable stench[386]. At greater distances, these clouds being dispersed by the wind, became gradually attenuated, yet their dispersion set no bounds to the pestilence, and it was as if they had imparted to the lower strata of the atmosphere a kind of ferment which went on engendering itself, even without the presence of the thick misty vapour, and being received into men’s lungs, produced the frightful disease everywhere[387]. Noxious exhalations from dung-pits, stagnant waters, swamps, impure canals, and the odour of foul rushes, which were in general use in the dwellings in England, together with all kinds of offensive rubbish, seemed not a little to contribute to it; and it was remarked universally, that wherever such offensive odours prevailed, the Sweating Sickness appeared more malignant[388]. It is a known fact, that in a certain state of the atmosphere, which is perhaps principally dependent on electrical conditions and the degree of heat, mephitic odours exhale more easily and powerfully. To the quality of the air at that time prevalent in England, this peculiarity may certainly be attributed, although it must be confessed, that upon this point there are no accurate data to be discovered.

The epidemic spread quickly all over England, reaching as far as the Scottish borders and extending to the coastlines, under more extraordinary and memorable conditions than seen in almost any other epidemic. It truly seemed that the banks of the Severn were the center of the disease, from which a genuine contamination of the air spread in all directions. Wherever the winds carried the foul mist, people became infected with the Sweating Sickness, and more or less, the same horrifying and distressing scenes that occurred in Shrewsbury were repeated. These toxic clouds of mist were seen moving from place to place, carrying the disease with them, affecting one town after another, and each morning and evening 292spreading their unbearable stench[386]. At greater distances, these clouds, dispersed by the wind, thinned out gradually, yet their spread didn’t stop the plague, and it seemed as if they had given the lower layers of the atmosphere a kind of ferment that continued to breed, even without the dense mist, and when inhaled by people, it caused the terrible disease everywhere[387]. Harmful fumes from manure pits, stagnant waters, swamps, dirty canals, and the scent of foul rushes, commonly used in English homes, along with various kinds of offensive waste, appeared to contribute significantly to the situation; it was widely noted that wherever such unpleasant smells were present, the Sweating Sickness seemed more severe[388]. It’s well-known that in a certain state of the atmosphere, which likely depends mainly on electrical conditions and heat levels, foul odors can be released more easily and intensely. This peculiarity can certainly be attributed to the air quality prevalent in England at that time, although it must be admitted that there is no precise data available on this point.

The disease lasted upon the whole almost half a year, namely, from the 15th of April to the 30th of September[389]; it thus passed but gradually from place to place, and we do not observe here, that it spread with that rapidity, which, in the autumn of 1529, had excited such great wonder in Germany. It is much to be regretted, that contemporary writers either gave no intelligence respecting the irruption or course of the epidemic Sweating Sickness in individual towns, or, if they did so, that this has not been made use of by subsequent writers. Doubtless, a very considerable diversity of circumstances would here present themselves, and the very peculiar manner in which the corruption of the atmosphere spread on this occasion, 293might perhaps have been estimated from certain facts, and not from mere suppositions. Thus the only fact that has been handed down is very remarkable; namely, that the Sweating Sickness required a whole quarter of a year to traverse the short distance from Shrewsbury to London; for it did not break out there until the 9th of July, and in a few days, according to its former mode, reached its height, so that the rapid increase of deaths excited terror throughout the whole city[390]. Yet the mortality was considerably less than at Shrewsbury, for there died in the whole of the first week only eight hundred inhabitants[391], and we may consider it decided, although all the contemporaries are silent on this very essential question, that the pestilence nowhere lasted longer than fifteen days, and perhaps in most places, as formerly, only five or six.

The disease lasted almost half a year, specifically, from April 15th to September 30th[389]; it spread gradually from place to place, and we don't see here that it propagated with the same speed that had amazed people in Germany during the autumn of 1529. It's unfortunate that contemporary writers either didn't provide any information about the outbreak or spread of the epidemic Sweating Sickness in specific towns, or if they did, that later writers have not utilized this information. Certainly, there would have been a significant variety of circumstances, and the very unique way in which the corrupt atmosphere spread this time, 293could possibly have been assessed based on certain facts rather than mere assumptions. The only notable fact that has been recorded is quite striking; namely, that the Sweating Sickness took a full quarter of a year to travel the short distance from Shrewsbury to London, as it didn't break out there until July 9th, and in just a few days, like before, reached its peak, causing a rapid increase in deaths that created panic throughout the city[390]. However, the death toll was significantly lower than in Shrewsbury, as only eight hundred residents died in the entire first week[391], and we can conclude, even though all contemporaries remain silent on this crucial issue, that the plague did not last more than fifteen days anywhere, and likely in most places, as before, only five or six.

The deaths throughout the kingdom were very numerous, so that one historian actually calls it a depopulation[392]. No rank of life remained exempt, but the Sweating Sickness raged with equal violence in the foul huts of the poor and in the palaces of the nobility[393]. The piety which, in the general dejection, was displayed by the whole nation, giving birth to innumerable works of Christian benevolence and philanthropy, whereby undoubtedly many tears were dried up—many orphans and widows protected from distress and want, is hence explained: for this phenomenon, highly delightful as it is in itself, occurs only under great afflictions and a general fear of death, as we are taught by the universal history of epidemics. We are willing to believe, to the honour of the English, that the religious impulse which they derived from their ecclesiastical reformation, may have had no small share in its production; yet, unfortunately, such is the nature of human society, that no sooner is the calamity over, than virtue relaxes. Scarcely were the funeral obsequies performed, when every thing returned to the usual routine[394]; in like manner, the Byzantines once, during a great earthquake, were seized with a fear of God, such as they had never before felt; day and night they flocked to 294the churches; nothing was to be seen but Christian virtue, self-denial, and works of benevolence, but these only lasted until the earth again became firm[395].

The deaths across the kingdom were extremely high, so much so that one historian actually referred to it as a depopulation[392]. No social class was spared; the Sweating Sickness spread with equal intensity in the rundown shacks of the poor and the luxurious palaces of the wealthy[393]. The devotion shown by the entire nation during this widespread despair resulted in countless acts of Christian kindness and charity, which undoubtedly eased many sorrows—protecting many orphans and widows from hardship and need. This phenomenon, while commendable in itself, typically arises only during times of great suffering and widespread fear of death, as we learn from the history of epidemics. We want to believe, in honor of the English, that the religious passion stemming from their church reforms contributed significantly to this outpouring of compassion; yet, unfortunately, such is the nature of human society that as soon as the crisis passes, virtue tends to fade. Hardly had the funeral rites concluded when everything went back to normal[394]; similarly, during a massive earthquake, the Byzantines experienced a fear of God like never before; they flocked to 294 the churches day and night, displaying nothing but Christian virtue, selflessness, and acts of kindness, but this lasted only until the ground stabilized again[395].

The very remarkable observation was made in this year, that the Sweating Sickness uniformly spared foreigners in England, and, on the other hand, followed the English into foreign countries, so that those who were in the Netherlands and France, and even in Spain, were carried off in no inconsiderable numbers by their indigenous pestilence, which was nowhere caught by the natives.

The very notable observation was made this year, that the Sweating Sickness consistently spared foreigners in England, while it affected the English when they traveled abroad, leading to significant numbers of them being taken down by local diseases in the Netherlands, France, and even Spain, which the locals never caught.

Not a single French inhabitant[396] of the neighbouring town of Calais was affected, and neither the Scotch inhabitants of the same island, nor the Irish, were visited by the Sweating Sickness, so that we cannot get rid of the notion, that there was some peculiarity in the whole constitution of the English which rendered them exclusively susceptible of this disease. To make this out accurately would be so much the more difficult, because, in the original year of the Sweating Sickness, foreigners were the very persons among whom the English disease broke out; and again, because English persons who had lived a year in France, on their return home in the summer of 1551, became the subjects of Sweating Sickness[397]. Contemporaries, indeed, find a cause in the gluttony and rude mode of life of the English. In short, in all those remote causes with which we have already become acquainted, and which, doubtless, also had their part in preparing the same scourge for the Germans and Flemings in 1529. Kaye, the most efficient eye-witness, even brings in proof of this view, that the temperate in England remained exempt from the Sweating Sickness, and on the contrary, that some Frenchmen at Calais, who were too much devoted to English manners, were seized with it[398]. To this alone, however, this susceptibility cannot be attributed, unless we would 295be content with the antiquated system of giving too much weight to remote causes, opposed to which we are met by the striking fact, that the Germans and Netherlanders, who had scarcely much improved in their manners since 1529, were not again visited by their old enemy.

Not a single French resident of the nearby town of Calais was affected, and neither the Scottish inhabitants of the same island nor the Irish were struck by the Sweating Sickness. This leads us to consider the possibility that there was something unique about the overall constitution of the English that made them particularly vulnerable to this disease. It becomes even more challenging to pinpoint this accurately because, in the initial outbreak of the Sweating Sickness, it was actually foreigners among whom the English disease first spread. Additionally, English people who had lived for a year in France, upon returning home in the summer of 1551, fell victim to the Sweating Sickness. Contemporary accounts suggest that the cause lies in the indulgent and rough lifestyle of the English. Overall, there are many remote factors we've already discussed that likely also contributed to the same plague affecting the Germans and Flemings in 1529. Kaye, a key eyewitness, even supports this viewpoint by noting that the more moderate individuals in England remained unaffected by the Sweating Sickness, while some Frenchmen in Calais, who had adopted English ways, were struck by it. However, we can't attribute this susceptibility solely to that unless we want to rely on the outdated approach of overemphasizing remote causes. This is further contradicted by the notable fact that the Germans and Netherlanders, who hadn't significantly changed their ways since 1529, were not hit by their old foe again.

Sect. 3.—Causes.—Natural Phenomena.

It is easy to perceive, or rather we have no alternative but to suppose, an unknown something in the English atmosphere, which imparted to the inhabitants the rheumatic diathesis, or, if we will, so penetrated their bodies, overcharged as they were with crude juices[399], that their constitutions had the so-called opportunity, that is, were changed in such a manner as to fit them for the reception of the Sweating Sickness. Under such a condition, the common and more peculiar causes of this disease were not absolutely necessary, in order to induce its attack in a constitution thus long prepared for it, but the general causes of disease were sufficient of themselves to give it its last stimulus, although this should be in an entirely different climate, as in the present instance was the case with the English who were living in Spain, and with the Venetian ambassador Naugerio, who, in the year 1528, fell ill of the petechial fever, when far from Italy, and living in France[400].

It’s easy to notice, or rather we have no choice but to assume, there’s something unknown in the English atmosphere that gave people a tendency to rheumatism, or, if you prefer, so deeply affected their bodies, which were overloaded with unhealthy substances[399], that their constitutions had the so-called opportunity, meaning they were changed in a way that made them susceptible to the Sweating Sickness. In this state, the usual and more specific causes of this disease weren’t strictly necessary to trigger an outbreak in a body that had been prepared for it for so long; the general causes of illness were enough by themselves to provide the final push, even if that happened in a completely different climate, as happened with the English living in Spain and with the Venetian ambassador Naugerio, who fell ill with petechial fever in 1528, far from Italy while living in France[400].

It has, no doubt, struck the reader that each of the five eruptions in England lasted much longer than the single one which occurred in Germany and the north of Europe. This, too, might well depend upon peculiarities in the English soil. But let us now endeavour to render manifest, by means of phenomena actually observed, that unknown something in the atmosphere of 1551, the θεῖον of the great Hippocrates, which announces its presence by the sickening of the people; for beyond this it is not granted that human researches should penetrate. The winter of 1550–51 was dry and warm in England; the spring dry and cold; the summer and autumn hot and moist[401]. The weather of the whole year was uncommon in many particulars, without, however, influencing 296the lives of plants and animals so much or through so great a range as at the time of the fourth epidemic of Sweating Sickness. It was even in some places praised as fruitful[402]. On the 10th of January a violent tempest occurred, which in Germany left no small traces[403] of its effects on houses and towers. The same day brought considerable floods in the river district of the Lahn, which must be noticed on account of the very unusual season of the year[404]. On the 13th of January, again at an unusual season, there followed a great storm with heavy rains[405], which spread over the north of Germany; and on the 28th of January there occurred a considerable earthquake in Lisbon, whereby about two hundred houses were overthrown, and nearly a thousand people were destroyed; whilst a fiery meteor appeared, which, according to the unsatisfactory descriptions of the time, resembled most a northern light, and therefore was, in all probability, of electrical origin[406]. This was succeeded in Germany by a great frost in February[407]. On the 21st of March, at seven o’clock in the morning, two mock suns, with three rainbows, were seen at Magdeburg and in its vicinity, and in the evening two mock moons[408]. The same mock suns were also observed at Wittenberg, but without the rainbows. A similar phenomenon with two rainbows was again seen on the 27th of March[409]; and mock suns had been observed at Antwerp as early as the 28th of February[410]. About the same time (21st of March) the Oder overflowed its banks[411], and floods followed after continued rains during the month of May in Thuringia and Franconia[412]. Great tempests were not wanting[413], and, after considerable heat, there occurred, on the 26th of June, a thick summer fog in the districts of the Elbe which deprived the besiegers of Magdeburg of the sight of that city. It may, therefore, be supposed that this phenomenon took place throughout a greater extent of country[414]. On the 22nd of September a meteor, like a northern light, was again seen, and on the 29th 297of that month, after some clear weather, a heavy fall of snow was followed by continued cold[415].

It's likely that readers have noticed that each of the five outbreaks in England lasted much longer than the single one that took place in Germany and northern Europe. This difference might also be due to specific qualities of the English soil. Now, let’s try to clarify, through observed phenomena, that unknown factor in the atmosphere of 1551, the divine of the great Hippocrates, which shows its presence by making people ill; beyond this point, human inquiry isn't meant to go. The winter of 1550–51 was dry and warm in England; spring was dry and cold; summer and autumn were hot and moist[401]. The overall weather of the year was unusual in many ways, yet it didn't affect the lives of plants and animals as significantly or broadly as during the fourth epidemic of Sweating Sickness. In fact, some areas even praised it as fruitful[402]. On January 10th, a severe storm struck, causing significant damage in Germany to houses and towers. The same day brought heavy floods in the river region of the Lahn, noteworthy due to the unusual season[403]. On January 13th, again at an unusual time of year, a major storm with heavy rains swept across northern Germany; and on January 28th, a significant earthquake hit Lisbon, destroying about two hundred houses and nearly a thousand lives were lost; during this time, a fiery meteor was seen, which, based on the vague descriptions of the era, seemed most like a northern light, likely having an electrical origin[406]. This was followed in Germany by a severe frost in February[407]. On March 21st, at seven o’clock in the morning, two mock suns with three rainbows were sighted in Magdeburg and nearby, and in the evening, two mock moons appeared[408]. The same mock suns were also seen at Wittenberg, but without the rainbows. A similar event with two rainbows was observed again on March 27th[409]; and mock suns had been noted at Antwerp as early as February 28th[410]. Around the same time (March 21st), the Oder overflowed its banks[411], with floods occurring after persistent rains in May in Thuringia and Franconia[412]. There were significant tempests as well[413], and after considerable heat, on June 26th, a thick summer fog in the Elbe region obstructed the besiegers' view of Magdeburg. Thus, it could be assumed that this phenomenon extended over a wider area[414]. On September 22nd, a meteor resembling a northern light was observed again, and on the 29th 297 of that month, following some clear weather, a heavy snowfall was succeeded by ongoing cold[415].

These facts are sufficient plainly to prove that the course of the year 1551 was unusual, that the atmosphere was overcharged with water, and that the electrical conditions of it were considerably disturbed; nor must we omit to notice that, for the first time since 1547, mould spots again appeared in Germany on clothes, and red discolorations of water, as likewise an exuberance of the lowest cryptogamic species of vegetation[416].

These facts clearly prove that the year 1551 was unusual, that the atmosphere was saturated with moisture, and that the electrical conditions were significantly disrupted. We should also point out that, for the first time since 1547, mold spots reappeared on clothing in Germany, along with red discolorations in water, as well as an abundance of the lowest types of cryptogamic vegetation[416].

Sect. 4.—Diseases.

During the years of scarcity, from 1528 to 1534, it excited general surprise that malignant fevers, more especially the plague, petechial fever, and encephalitis, which in the individual accounts we can seldom sufficiently distinguish from each other, were constantly recurring, and, creeping slowly as they did from place to place, had no sooner finished their wandering visitations of whole districts of country, than they again made their appearance where they had broken out in former years[417]. It was a century of putrid malignant affections, in which typhous diseases were continually prevailing—a century replete with grand phenomena affecting human life in general, and continuing so, long after the period to which our researches refer.

During the years of scarcity, from 1528 to 1534, it was widely surprising that serious fevers, especially the plague, petechial fever, and encephalitis, which are difficult to differentiate in individual accounts, kept coming back. They crept slowly from place to place and, as soon as they had finished their wandering visitations of entire regions, they would reappear in the same places as in previous years[417]. It was a century of putrid malignant affections, where typhus diseases were constantly prevalent—a century filled with significant events impacting human life overall, continuing long after the period our research covers.

There existed also an epidemic flux which, during a cold summer[418] in 1538, spread over a great part of Europe, and especially over France, so that, according to the assurance of an eminent physician, there was scarcely any town exempt from it[419]. Of this flux we have unfortunately but very defective reports, 298among which we find a statement, not without importance, that there were no extraordinary forerunners, such as are observed in phenomena of this kind, to account for this epidemic[420]. Two years earlier, however, (12th of July 1536,) Erasmus died of the flux[421]. This disease seldom occurs sporadically, but usually as an epidemic, and thus, perhaps slighter visitations of this rheumatic malady may be assumed to have preceded that greater one which took place in 1538.

There was also an epidemic wave that, during a cold summer in 1538, spread across a large part of Europe, especially France, so that, according to a respected doctor, almost no town was free from it. Unfortunately, we have very incomplete reports about this outbreak, among which we find a noteworthy statement that there were no unusual signs, like those seen in similar situations, to explain this epidemic. However, two years earlier, on July 12, 1536, Erasmus died from this illness. This disease rarely appears in isolated cases but usually as an epidemic, and so it’s possible that milder instances of this rheumatic illness may have occurred before the larger outbreak that happened in 1538.

A period remarkable for plague followed in the year 1540, and ended about 1543. The summer of the first named year is especially mentioned in the chronicles as having been hot, and throughout the whole century it continued to be in great repute on account of the excellent wine it produced[422]. A spontaneous conflagration of the woods was frequent, and an earthquake was felt in Germany on the 14th of December[423]. Thereupon, in 1541, there followed in Constantinople a great plague[424] which, in the year 1542, spread by means of a Turkish invasion into Hungary, its superior importance being indicated by the presence of accompanying phenomena, among which the swarms of locusts that appeared this year are especially worthy of note. They came from the interior of Asia, and travelled in dense masses over Europe, passing northward over the Elbe[425], and southward as far as Spain[426]. Kaye saw a cloud of locusts of this description in Padua; their passage lasted full two hours, and they extended further than the eye could reach[427]. The plague quickly spread in Hungary and caused a similar destruction to the imperial army, which was fighting against the Turks under Joachim the Second, Elector of Brandenburg, as it had formerly caused the French before Naples[428]. Whether this pestilence may have been the original oriental glandular plague, or whether we may assume that it had already degenerated into the Hungarian Petechial Fever, such as likewise broke out in the year 1566, in the camp near Komorn, during the campaign of 299Maximilian the Second, and thence, by means of the disbanded lansquenets, spread in all directions[429], cannot now well be determined for want of ascertained facts. In the following year, 1543, however, this plague broke out in Germany, namely, in the Harz districts in the provinces of the Saale[430], and still more malignantly at Metz[431], yet upon the whole it did not cause any considerable loss of life.

A notable period marked by plague occurred in 1540 and lasted until around 1543. The summer of 1540 is especially mentioned in the chronicles for being hot, and throughout the century, it was highly regarded for the excellent wine it produced[422]. There were frequent wildfires, and an earthquake was felt in Germany on December 14[423]. Then, in 1541, a significant plague struck Constantinople[424], which in 1542 spread into Hungary due to a Turkish invasion. This outbreak was significant, evidenced by accompanying events, notably the swarms of locusts that appeared that year. These locusts came from central Asia and traveled in dense clouds across Europe, moving north over the Elbe[425] and south as far as Spain[426]. Kaye observed a cloud of locusts in Padua; their passage lasted two full hours and extended beyond what the eye could see[427]. The plague quickly spread in Hungary, causing similar destruction to the imperial army, which was fighting against the Turks under Joachim II, Elector of Brandenburg, just as it had previously affected the French near Naples[428]. It remains unclear whether this plague was the original oriental glandular plague or if it had already evolved into the Hungarian Petechial Fever, which also broke out in 1566 in the camp near Komorn during the campaign of 299Maximilian II, and then spread in all directions through the disbanded lansquenets[429]. However, in 1543, this plague broke out in Germany, specifically in the Harz region in the Saale provinces[430], and was particularly severe in Metz[431], though overall it did not result in significant loss of life.

In the years 1545 and 1546 we again find the Trousse-galant in France[432]. It proved fatal to the Duke of Orleans, second son of Francis the First, in the neighbourhood of Boulogne, and, according to the testimony of French historians, to ten thousand English in that fort, so that the garrison was obliged to pitch a camp outside the town, and the reluctant reinforcements felt that they were encountering certain death[433]. The disease spread itself also among the French troops, and we have seen that it extended its dominion beyond the Alps of Savoy[434].

In 1545 and 1546, we see the Trousse-galant reappearing in France[432]. It was deadly for the Duke of Orleans, the second son of Francis the First, near Boulogne, and according to French historians, also claimed the lives of ten thousand English soldiers stationed in that fort. As a result, the garrison had to set up camp outside the town, and the hesitant reinforcements felt they were facing certain death[433]. The disease also spread among the French troops, and we have noted that it extended its reach beyond the Alps of Savoy[434].

It thus appears, that, up to the period of which we have been speaking, the year 1544 alone was free from great visitations of disease, but it would be difficult from thenceforth satisfactorily to define the individual groups of epidemics, if the connexion of the epidemic Sweating Sickness of the year 1551 with them is to be made out; for there was, to use an expression of the schools, a continued typhous constitution, which extended throughout this whole period, manifesting itself on the slightest causes by malignant diseases; so that the visitations of sickness which we have hitherto been describing do but appear as exacerbations of them, with a predominance sometimes of one and sometimes of another set of symptoms.

It seems that up until the time we've been discussing, the year 1544 was the only one without major outbreaks of disease. However, it would be challenging to clearly define the specific groups of epidemics from that point on, especially when trying to connect the epidemic Sweating Sickness of 1551 to them. There was, as the schools would say, a persistent typhous constitution that lasted throughout this entire period, showing up in response to even minor triggers with severe illnesses. Therefore, the outbreaks of sickness we've described so far appear to be just flare-ups, sometimes showing one set of symptoms more prominently and other times another.

The camp fever, which prevailed in the spring of 1547 among the imperial troops, there is good ground for considering to have been petechial. A great many soldiers fell sick of it, and it was so much the more malignant because the imperial army was composed of a variety of soldiery, Spaniards, Germans, Hungarians, and Bohemians. Those who were seized complained, as in encephalitis, of insufferable heat of the head, their eyes were swollen and started glistening from their sockets, 300their offensive breath poisoned the atmosphere around them, their tongues were covered with a brown crust, they vomited bile, their skin was of a leaden hue, and a deep purple eruption broke forth upon it. The disease, the fresh seeds of which the imperial hussars had brought with them out of Hungary, proved fatal as early as the second or third day, and it may be taken for granted, that both before and after the battle of Muhlberg (24th of April) it made no small ravages in Saxony[435]; yet it did not become general.

The camp fever that affected the imperial troops in the spring of 1547 is believed to have been petechial. Many soldiers fell ill, and it was particularly severe because the imperial army consisted of various nationalities, including Spaniards, Germans, Hungarians, and Bohemians. Those who were infected experienced symptoms similar to encephalitis, such as unbearable heat in the head, swollen eyes that seemed to glisten from their sockets, and breath that polluted the air around them. Their tongues were coated with a brown crust, they vomited bile, their skin turned a leaden color, and a deep purple rash appeared. The illness, which the imperial hussars had brought from Hungary, proved fatal within just a couple of days, and it’s reasonable to assume that it caused significant devastation in Saxony both before and after the battle of Muhlberg (April 24th); however, it didn't spread widely.

After a short interval the unusual phenomena of 1549 again increased; the chronicles of central Germany record blights and murrains in that year. They speak likewise of a northern light seen on the 21st of September, and of a malignant disease which, till the winter set in, carried off young people in no small numbers[436]. According to all appearance this disease was a petechial fever, which in the following year, 1550, likewise visited the March of Brandenburg, Thuringia and Saxony[437]. The mortality was particularly great at Eisleben, where, in less than four weeks from the 14th September, 257 fell a sacrifice to it, and after this period it happened often that from twenty to twenty-four bodies were buried in one day; so that the loss in this little town may be reckoned at least at 500[438]. From this slight example the great malignity of the plagues of the sixteenth century will be perceived, and it would be still more evident if the physicians of those times had made more careful observations, and historians had more accurately recorded facts of this kind.

After a brief period, the strange events of 1549 increased again; the records from central Germany note crop failures and livestock diseases in that year. They also mention a northern light seen on September 21st and a deadly illness that took many young lives until winter arrived. This illness appears to have been a petechial fever, which also impacted the March of Brandenburg, Thuringia, and Saxony the following year, 1550. The death toll was especially high in Eisleben, where, in less than four weeks from September 14th, 257 people died from it, and during this time it was common for twenty to twenty-four bodies to be buried in a single day; therefore, the loss in this small town can be estimated at least at 500. This small example illustrates the severity of the plagues in the sixteenth century, and it would be even clearer if the doctors of that time had made more thorough observations, and historians had accurately recorded such facts.

In 1551 there prevailed in Swabia a disease of the nature of plague, which determined the Duke Christoph, of Würtemburg, to withdraw himself from Stuttgard. It did not spread, and seems to have remained unknown to the rest of Germany[439]. In Spain, too, the plague[440] shewed itself, and if to this be added the influenza of the same year[441], as well as the numerous cases of malignant fevers in Germany and Switzerland, which were spoken of as still existing in the two following years[442], it will again be seen quite evidently that the fifth epidemic Sweating Sickness 301appeared, accompanied by a group of various epidemic diseases, which might be considered as resulting from general influences. The disease which is the subject of our research thus took its departure from Europe similarly accompanied as when it originally sprang up there, while in the interval it thrice repeated its deadly attacks.

In 1551, a plague-like disease broke out in Swabia, prompting Duke Christoph of Würtemburg to leave Stuttgart. It didn't spread widely and seemed to go unnoticed by the rest of Germany[439]. In Spain, the plague[440] also made an appearance, and if we consider the influenza of the same year[441], along with the many cases of severe fevers in Germany and Switzerland, which were reported to still be present in the following two years[442], it's clear that the fifth epidemic Sweating Sickness 301emerged alongside a variety of other epidemic diseases, likely due to widespread influences. The disease we're studying thus began in Europe similarly to how it first appeared there, while in between, it struck deadly three times.

Sect. 5.—John Kaye.

Let us dedicate a few moments to the observer of the fifth sweating pestilence, whose life presents a lively image of the peculiarities and tendencies of his age. He was born at Norwich on the 6th of October, 1510, and received his education at Gonville Hall, Cambridge. He had early evinced by some productions his great knowledge of the Greek language, and his zeal for theological investigations. At a maturer age he went to Italy, at that time the seat of scientific learning, where Baptista Montanus and Vesalius, at Padua, initiated him in the healing art. He took his Doctor’s degree at Bologna, and in 1542 he lectured on Aristotle in conjunction with Realdus Columbus, with great approbation. The following year he travelled throughout Italy, and with much diligence collated manuscripts for the emendation of Galen and Celsus, attended the prælections of Matthæus Curtius at Pisa, and then returned through France and Germany to his own country.

Let’s take a moment to focus on the observer of the fifth sweating plague, whose life reflects the unique features and trends of his time. He was born in Norwich on October 6, 1510, and educated at Gonville Hall, Cambridge. He had already shown his extensive knowledge of the Greek language and passion for theological studies with some early works. As he grew older, he traveled to Italy, which was then a center of scientific knowledge, where Baptista Montanus and Vesalius at Padua introduced him to medicine. He earned his Doctor’s degree at Bologna, and in 1542, he lectured on Aristotle alongside Realdus Columbus, receiving much praise. The following year, he traveled across Italy, diligently collecting manuscripts to improve the works of Galen and Celsus, attended lectures by Matthæus Curtius at Pisa, and then made his way back through France and Germany to his homeland.

After being admitted as a doctor of medicine at Cambridge, he practised with great distinction at Shrewsbury and Norwich, but was soon summoned by Henry the Eighth to deliver anatomical lectures to the surgeons in London. He was much honoured at the court of Edward the Sixth, and the appointment of body physician, which this monarch bestowed on him, he retained also under Queen Mary and Elizabeth. In 1547, he became a Fellow of the College of Physicians, over which, at a later period, he presided for seven years. He constantly supported the honour of this body with great zeal, compiled its Annals from the period of its foundation by Linacre to the end of his own presidentship, and originated an establishment, the first of the kind in England[443], for annually performing two public dissections of human bodies.

After graduating as a doctor of medicine at Cambridge, he practiced with great distinction in Shrewsbury and Norwich, but was soon called by Henry the Eighth to give anatomical lectures to the surgeons in London. He was highly respected at the court of Edward the Sixth, and he held the position of body physician, which this monarch awarded him, also during the reigns of Queen Mary and Elizabeth. In 1547, he became a Fellow of the College of Physicians, which he later presided over for seven years. He consistently upheld the honor of this organization with great enthusiasm, compiled its Annals from the time of its founding by Linacre to the end of his own presidency, and initiated an establishment, the first of its kind in England[443], to conduct two public dissections of human bodies each year.

That he was thus established in London before the year 1551 is certain, yet he was present in Shrewsbury, during the 302Sweating Sickness. His pamphlet[444] upon this disease, the first and last published in England, did not, however, appear before 1552, after all was over. It is written in strong language and a popular style, and with a laudable frankness; for Kaye blames in it, without any reserve, the gross mode of living of his countrymen, and does not fatigue his reader with too much book learning, which neither he nor his contemporaries could refrain from displaying on other occasions. He reserved this for the Latin version of his pamphlet, which was published four years later[445], and although, judged according to a modern standard, it is far from being satisfactory, yet it contains an abundance of valuable matter, and proves its author to be a good observer; and in this we can nowhere mistake that he is an Englishman of the sixteenth century, however numerous the terms he may borrow from Celsus. His doctrines are of the old Greek school throughout, of which the physicians of those times were staunch supporters; hence the term ephemera[446] pestilens, his comparison of the disease with the similar fevers of the ancients[447], and his accurate appreciation of the important doctrine of æthereal spirits, to which he refers its chief causes, and, according to which, the corrupted atmosphere (spiritus corrupti) becomes mixed in the lungs with the spirits of blood, (spiritus sanguinis,) whence it at once appears explicable to him, why many persons may be attacked with the Sweating Sickness at the same time, and even in different places, and why the parts of the body in which, according to the ancient Greek notion, the æthereal spirits developed themselves, were most violently affected with this disease[448]. From the relationship of the infected air to the æthereal spirits in the body, polluted by intemperance, it also appears explicable to him, why foreigners in England, in whom this pollution took place in a less degree, were, only in cases of individual exception, attacked by the Sweating Sickness[449], not to mention other theoretical notions.

That he was established in London before 1551 is certain, yet he was in Shrewsbury during the Sweating Sickness. His pamphlet on this disease, the first and last published in England, didn’t come out until 1552, after it had all ended. It’s written in strong language and a popular style, with a commendable honesty; Kaye openly criticizes the poor lifestyle choices of his countrymen and doesn’t bore his readers with too much academic jargon, which neither he nor his contemporaries could resist using on other occasions. He saved that for the Latin version of his pamphlet, published four years later, and although it wouldn’t satisfy modern standards, it contains plenty of valuable information and shows that he was a keen observer; it’s clear he was an Englishman of the sixteenth century, no matter how many terms he borrowed from Celsus. His ideas are rooted in the old Greek school, which the physicians of that era strongly supported; hence his use of the term *ephemera pestilens*, his comparison of the disease to similar fevers from ancient times, and his accurate understanding of the important theory of æthereal spirits, which he associates with its main causes. According to this, the tainted atmosphere (spiritus corrupti) mixes in the lungs with the spirits of blood (spiritus sanguinis), so it makes sense to him why many people can be struck by the Sweating Sickness simultaneously, even in different locations, and why the parts of the body where, according to ancient Greek beliefs, the æthereal spirits manifest, were most severely affected by this illness. From the link between the contaminated air and the æthereal spirits in the body, harmed by excess, it also explains to him why foreigners in England, who suffered less pollution, were only rarely struck down by the Sweating Sickness, not to mention other theoretical ideas.

On malaria in general, as he was an observant naturalist, he was enabled to turn to good account his experience in Italy and his knowledge of the ancients, and his estimation of the 303subordinate causes, with regard to which he takes up the same position as Agricola, who was also a good naturalist, is likewise on the whole worthy of approbation[450]. The immoderate use of beer, amongst the English, was considered by many as the principal reason why the Sweating Sickness was confined to this nation. On this subject he enlarges even to prolixity, with evident English predilection for this beverage which manifestly contributed to the morbid repletion of the people; and he himself acknowledged this as a principal cause of the Sweating Sickness. The injurious quality of salt-fish, as alleged by Erasmus and the German physician Hellwetter[451], he would not altogether have ventured to reject[452], for it caused constant and abundant fetid perspirations, and might thus have contributed to pave the way for the Sweating Sickness. A similar source was to be found in the dirty rush floors in the English houses[453], and other subordinate causes of the disease of which mention has been made in the course of this treatise.

On malaria in general, since he was an observant naturalist, he was able to effectively utilize his experiences in Italy and his knowledge of ancient texts, and his assessment of the 303secondary causes, with which he aligns himself similarly to Agricola, who was also a keen naturalist, is overall worthy of approval[450]. The excessive consumption of beer among the English was seen by many as the main reason why the Sweating Sickness was limited to this nation. He discusses this topic at length, showing a clear English preference for this drink, which clearly contributed to the unhealthy excess of the population; he himself acknowledged this as a key factor in the Sweating Sickness. The harmful nature of salt fish, as claimed by Erasmus and the German physician Hellwetter[451], he would not completely dismiss[452], as it caused persistent and foul-smelling sweating, which could have helped set the stage for the Sweating Sickness. A similar issue was found in the dirty rush floors in English homes[453], along with other secondary causes of the illness that have been mentioned throughout this treatise.

As a zealous advocate of temperance, it were to be wished that he had met with more attention; but the words of a good physician are given to the winds, when they are directed against vices and habits of sensual indulgence; people require from him an infallible preservative, and not a lecture on morality. His precepts on food and beverage are circumstantial, after the manner of the ancients, and he recommends such a variety, that it is difficult to make a choice; while nothing but the greatest simplicity can be of any avail. Purifying fires, which were kindled everywhere in times of plague, are also much lauded by him, and we here learn incidentally, that the smiths and cooks remained free[454] from the Sweating Sickness. Fumigations with odoriferous substances of all kinds, even the most costly Indian spices, were everywhere employed in the houses of the rich, and no one stirred out without having with him some one of the thousand scents recommended from time immemorial during the plague. The medicines which he recommends are those that were then in vogue; among which Theriaca, Armenian Bole, and Pearls, occur in various combinations, yet most of the prophylactics which he advises for obviating any defect in the constitution are not very violent.

As a passionate supporter of temperance, it would have been nice if he had received more attention; however, the advice of a good doctor often falls on deaf ears when it challenges vices and habits of indulgence. People want an infallible solution from him, not a morality lesson. His guidance on food and drink is detailed, in the style of the ancients, and he suggests such a range that it's hard to make a choice; yet, only the simplest options are truly effective. He also praises the "purifying fires" that were lit everywhere during outbreaks, and we learn that blacksmiths and cooks stayed safe from the Sweating Sickness. Fumigations with pleasant scents of all kinds, even the most expensive Indian spices, were commonly used in wealthy households, and no one went outside without carrying one of the many fragrances recommended throughout history during the plague. The medicines he suggests were popular at the time, including Theriaca, Armenian Bole, and Pearls, in various combinations, but most of the preventive measures he recommends for avoiding any health issues are not very harsh.

304

304

Kaye’s treatment of the Sweating Sickness is according to the mild old English plan, which is very judiciously and perspicuously laid down. He kept himself, on the whole, free from the influence of the schools in this instance, and the only remedy which he approved in case of necessity, was a harmless and very favourite preparation of pearls and odoriferous substances, which was called Manus Christi[455], or, in Germany, sugar of pearls. It had its origin in the fifteenth century, and was the invention of Guainerus[456], and there were various receipts for compounding it[457]. He also sometimes prescribed, at the commencement of the attack[458], bole or terra sigillata, for how could a physician of the sixteenth century doubt the antipoisonous effect of this overrated remedy? Restlessness in the patient, debility, a too thick skin, and thick blood, are set forth by him as the chief impediments to the critical sweat, and in order to remove them, he sets to work with great and laudable caution, ordering, according to circumstances, even mulled wine and greater warmth. Sometimes, too, he could not refrain from employing Theriac and Mithridate, but he did not use these remedies to any great extent. For dropsical and rheumatic patients who became the subjects of the Sweating Sickness, he prescribed a beverage of Guaiacum; he also recommended as a sudorific, the China root, which was at that time much in use. When the perspiration broke out, he positively prohibited the urging it beyond the proper point; all medicines were thence laid aside, and he trusted to aromatic vinegar and gentle succussion alone for keeping off the lethargy, without considering, with Damianus, that more severe measures were essential[459].

Kaye’s approach to the Sweating Sickness follows the traditional English method, which is clearly and wisely outlined. He generally kept himself independent from the influence of medical schools in this case, and the only remedy he approved, when necessary, was a harmless and popular mix of pearls and fragrant substances, known as Manus Christi[455], or, in Germany, sugar of pearls. This remedy originated in the fifteenth century and was created by Guainerus[456], with various recipes for making it[457]. He also occasionally recommended, at the start of the illness[458], bole or terra sigillata, as how could a physician in the sixteenth century doubt the anti-poison properties of this overrated treatment? He identified restlessness in the patient, weakness, thick skin, and thick blood as the main obstacles to the critical sweat, and to address these, he proceeded with great caution, prescribing, depending on the situation, mulled wine and added warmth. Sometimes, he also couldn’t help but use Theriac and Mithridate, although he didn’t rely on these remedies heavily. For dropsical and rheumatic patients who were affected by the Sweating Sickness, he recommended a drink made from Guaiacum; he also suggested China root as a sudorific, which was widely used at that time. When sweating began, he firmly advised against pushing it too far; all medications were then set aside, and he relied solely on aromatic vinegar and gentle movement to prevent lethargy, without considering, like Damianus, that more aggressive measures were necessary[459].

As a learned patron of the sciences, Kaye ranks amongst the most distinguished men of his country. Through his interest, Gonville Hall was, in the reign of Queen Mary, elevated to the rank of a college, better established, and more richly endowed. To the end of his life, he continued to preside[460] over this his favourite institution, and passed his old age[461] there, not in 305Monkish contemplation, like Linacre, but zealously devoted to study, as the great number of his writings testifies. He was accused of having changed his faith according to circumstances. This pliability served, it is true, to retain him in favour with sovereigns of very opposite modes of thinking: it is not, however, a sign of elevation of mind, and can only be explained in part by the spirit of the English Reformation. Kaye was a reformer in fact, inasmuch as he was a promoter of instruction, and, perhaps, laid no stress on outward profession. His versatility as a scholar is extraordinary, and would be worthy of the highest admiration, had he entirely avoided the reproach of credulity, had he not been too prolix in subordinate matters, and had he shown more decided signs of genius. At one time he translated and illustrated the writings of Galen; at another, he wrote on philology or the medical art—it must be confessed, without much originality, for he took Galen and Montanus as his patterns[462]. But where could physicians be found at that time who did not follow established doctrines? Some essays on History and English Archæology are found among his writings[463]; and his works on Natural History[464], dedicated to Conrad Gesner, are among the best of his age, because he imparted his observations in them quite plainly and naturally, free from the trammels of any school. He died at Cambridge on the 29th of July, 1573, and ordered for himself the following epitaph-“Fui Caius.”

As a knowledgeable supporter of the sciences, Kaye is among the most distinguished men in his country. Thanks to his interest, Gonville Hall was, during the reign of Queen Mary, upgraded to a college, better established, and more generously funded. Until the end of his life, he continued to oversee[460] this favorite institution and spent his old age[461] there, not in 305monkish contemplation like Linacre, but actively engaged in study, as the numerous writings he produced show. He was accused of changing his faith based on circumstances. While this flexibility did help him stay in favor with rulers who had very different beliefs, it is not a sign of a lofty mind and can only partially be understood in the context of the English Reformation. Kaye was a true reformer, as he promoted education and perhaps placed less importance on outward professions of faith. His range as a scholar is remarkable and would deserve great admiration if he had avoided the criticism of being gullible, had not been too wordy on minor issues, and had shown more clear signs of genius. At one point, he translated and annotated the works of Galen; at another, he wrote about philology or the medical field—though it must be admitted, without much originality, as he borrowed from Galen and Montanus as his examples[462]. But where could you find physicians at that time who didn’t adhere to established beliefs? Some essays on history and English archaeology can be found among his writings[463]; and his works on natural history[464], dedicated to Conrad Gesner, are among the best of his time because he expressed his observations in them very clearly and naturally, free from the constraints of any particular school. He died in Cambridge on July 29, 1573, and requested the following epitaph for himself: “Fui Caius.”


306

CHAPTER VI.
Fever and chills.


For passion is the release of the bonds of the power towards life.
Aretæus.

Sect. 1.—The Cardiac Disease of the Ancients.

(Morbus Cardiacus.)

Thus by the autumn of 1551, the Sweating Sickness had vanished from the earth: it has never since appeared as it did then and at earlier periods; and it is not to be supposed, that it will ever again break forth as a great epidemic in the same form, and limited to a four-and-twenty hours’ course; for it is manifest, that the mode of living of the people had a great share in its origin; and this will never again be the same as in those days. Yet nature is not wanting in similar phenomena, which have appeared in ancient and modern times; and if we take into the account the great frequency of cognate rheumatic maladies, it is possible that isolated cases may have sometimes occurred, in which repletion of impure fluids, and violently inflammatory treatment have augmented a rheumatic fever, even to the destruction of nervous vitality, by means of profuse perspiration—only, perhaps, that they ran a longer course, (which does not constitute an essential difference,) and under totally different names, whereby attention is misled. Of all the diseases that have ever appeared which can in any way be compared to the English Sweating Sickness, we have principally three to look back upon—the cardiac disease of the ancients, the Picardy sweat, and the sweating fever of Rötingen. The first was, for reasons which have been already mentioned[465], almost unknown to the learned of the sixteenth century; and it is matter of surprise, that Kaye himself, who had chosen for his favourite the best Roman physician, we mean Celsus, could have so entirely overlooked 307his by no means unimportant statements respecting this disease. Houlier is the only author who ventures a comparison of the English Sweating Sickness with the ancient cardiac disease; his few, and almost lost words[466], remained however unheeded; nor are the differences between the two diseases small: but to return.

So by the fall of 1551, the Sweating Sickness had disappeared from the earth: it has never returned in the same way it did then or in earlier times; and it's unlikely that it will ever emerge again as a major epidemic in the same form, limited to a course of just twenty-four hours; because it's clear that the lifestyle of people played a significant role in its origin, and that will never again be the same as it was back then. However, nature is not lacking in similar phenomena that have appeared in both ancient and modern times; and if we consider the frequent occurrence of related rheumatic illnesses, it's possible that isolated cases may have appeared, where an overload of harmful fluids and extreme inflammatory treatment have intensified a rheumatic fever, potentially damaging nervous vitality through excessive sweating—though perhaps these cases had longer durations (which isn't a fundamental difference) and went by entirely different names, causing confusion. Of all the diseases that have emerged which can be compared to the English Sweating Sickness, we mainly recall three—the cardiac disease of the ancients, the Picardy sweat, and the sweating fever of Rötingen. The first was, for reasons already mentioned[465], nearly unknown to scholars of the sixteenth century; and it's surprising that Kaye, who favored the best Roman physician, Celsus, could have completely overlooked 307his important remarks about this disease. Houlier is the only author who attempts to compare the English Sweating Sickness with the ancient cardiac disease; his few and nearly forgotten words[466], however, went unacknowledged; and the differences between the two diseases are notable: but to go back.

The disease of which we are speaking appeared for a period of 500 years, (from 300 b.c. to 200 after Christ,) and was a common, almost every day occurrence, which is often mentioned even by non-medical writers. It was exceedingly dangerous, and even esteemed fatal; and as it was far above the reach of Greek physiology, there were not wanting extraordinary opinions respecting its nature, and bold and singular modes of treatment, to which those who were attacked were subjected. The name Cardiac disease (morbus cardiacus, νόσος καρδιακὴ and probably also νόσος καρδίτις,) was not bestowed by medical men, but by the people; who, in the fourth century before Christ, for the name is as ancient as that period, could not know that the learned would dispute on that subject. Some affirmed, and among them men of great authority, such as Erasistratus, Asclepiades, and Aretæus, that the people were in the right so to call the disease; that the heart was actually the part affected, and that their knowledge of the heart’s functions was by no means small[467]. Others, on the contrary, would only acknowledge in that name an expression indicative, not of the particular seat of the disease, but only of its importance, inasmuch as the heart is well adapted, as the centre and source of life, to indicate this[468]. Others again, who attempted more refined conjectures, wished to represent the pericardium as the seat of the malady, because darting pains were sometimes felt[469] in the region of the heart, or the diaphragm, or the lungs, or even the liver. The opinions were numerous; the actual knowledge was small[470].

The disease we're discussing lasted for about 500 years (from 300 B.C. to 200 A.D.) and was a common occurrence, often mentioned even by non-medical writers. It was extremely dangerous and often considered fatal; since it was way beyond the understanding of Greek medicine, there were many unusual theories about its nature and a variety of bold and unique treatments that people underwent when they were affected. The term Cardiac disease (morbus cardiacus, heart disease, and probably also heart disease) wasn't coined by doctors but by the general public, who in the fourth century B.C.—a term that dates back that far—couldn't have known that scholars would debate it later. Some, including highly respected figures like Erasistratus, Asclepiades, and Aretæus, argued that the public was correct in naming the disease this way; the heart was truly the affected organ, and their understanding of the heart's functions was quite significant[467]. Others, however, believed that the name only indicated the disease's importance, as the heart, being the center and source of life, was suitable for this designation[468]. Yet others, who proposed more complex theories, suggested that the pericardium was the real source of the illness, since sharp pains were sometimes felt[469] in the area of the heart, diaphragm, lungs, or even liver. There were many opinions; however, actual knowledge was limited[470].

308

308

The cardiac disease began with rigors and a numbness in the limbs[471], and sometimes even throughout the whole body. The pulse then took on the worst condition, was small, weak, frequent, empty, and as if dissolving; in a more advanced stage, unequal and fluttering, until it became completely extinct. Patients were affected with hallucinations[472]; they were sleepless, despaired of their recovery, and were usually covered suddenly with an ill-savoured perspiration over the whole body, whence the disorder was likewise called Diaphoresis. Sometimes, however, a washy sweat broke out, first on the face and neck. This then spread itself over the whole body; assumed a very disagreeable odour, became clammy and like water in which flesh had been macerated, and ran through the bed-clothes in streams, so that the patient seemed to be melting away[473]. The breath was short and panting almost to annihilation (insustentabilis). Those affected were in continual fear of suffocation[474]; tossed to and fro in the greatest anguish, and with a very thin and trembling voice uttered forth only broken words. They constantly felt an insufferable oppression in the left side, or even over the whole chest[475]; and in the paroxysms which were ushered in with a fainting fit, or were followed by one, the heart was tumultuous and palpitated, without any alteration in the smallness of the pulse[476]. The countenance was pale as death, the eyes sunk in their sockets, and when the disease took a fatal turn, all was darkness around them. The hands and feet turned blue; and whilst the heart, notwithstanding the universal coldness of the body, still beat violently, they for the most part retained possession of their senses. A few only wandered a short time before death, while others were even seized with convulsions and endowed with the power of prophecy[477]. Finally, the nails became curved on their cold hands, the skin was wrinkled, and thus the sufferers resigned their spirit without any mitigation of their miserable condition[478].

The heart disease began with chills and numbness in the limbs[471], and sometimes even spread throughout the entire body. The pulse then became very weak, small, fast, and felt like it was fading away; in a more advanced stage, it was uneven and fluttering, until it completely stopped. Patients experienced hallucinations[472]; they couldn't sleep, lost hope for recovery, and were often suddenly drenched in a foul-smelling sweat all over their bodies, leading to the disorder also being called Diaphoresis. Sometimes, however, a watery sweat would start on the face and neck, then spread across the entire body; it had a very unpleasant odor, became sticky and resembled water where meat had been soaked, and flowed through the bedclothes in streams, making the patient seem like they were melting away[473]. Breathing was short and gasping, almost to the point of suffocation (insustentabilis). Those affected constantly feared they would choke[474]; they tossed and turned in great distress and, with a very thin and trembling voice, managed to utter only fragmented words. They always felt an unbearable pressure in the left side or even across their whole chest[475]; and during the episodes that were preceded by a fainting fit or followed one, the heart was tumultuous and palpitated, without any change in the weakness of the pulse[476]. Their faces were , their eyes sunk in their sockets, and when the disease took a fatal turn, everything around them went dark. The hands and feet turned blue; and although the heart continued to beat violently despite the universal coldness of the body, they mostly remained aware of their surroundings. A few would wander off briefly before dying, while others experienced convulsions and had prophetic abilities[477]. Finally, the nails became curved on their cold hands, their skin wrinkled, and thus the sufferers passed away without any relief from their agonizing condition[478].

A striking resemblance is plainly perceived, from this description, between the ancient cardiac disease and the English Sweating Sickness in the most exquisite cases of each. In both the same palpitation of the heart, the same alteration of the voice, the same anxiety, the same impediment to respiration, and 309thence the same affection of the nerves of the chest, the same ill-scented sweat, and, by means of this sweat, the same fatal evacuation; in short, all the essential symptoms arising from the same circle of functions. For in the sweating pestilences of the ancients[479], as well as the moderns, the nerves of the abdomen remained unaffected; the liver, intestines, and kidneys, took no part in the primary affection; the diaphragm, as in the English Sweating Sickness, formed the partition. Hence the acute Aretæus did not hesitate to call the cardiac disease fainting (syncope), with certainly an unusual extension of the notion implied by this term, which in its common acceptation excludes the turbulent commotion of the heart. In the affection of the brain some difference occurs, for though the hallucination afforded an unfavourable prognostic in both diseases, yet the fatal stupor was peculiar to the English Sweating Sickness, no observer having made mention of it in the cardiac disease.

A striking similarity can be clearly seen in this description between the ancient heart disease and the English Sweating Sickness in their most severe cases. In both, there is the same heart palpitations, the same changes in voice, the same anxiety, the same difficulty in breathing, and 309 consequently the same impact on the chest's nerves, the same unpleasant sweat, and, through this sweat, the same deadly outcome; in short, all the key symptoms arise from the same set of functions. For in the sweating plagues of both the ancients[479] and the moderns, the nerves of the abdomen remained unharmed; the liver, intestines, and kidneys did not play a role in the main condition; the diaphragm, much like in the English Sweating Sickness, acted as the dividing line. Thus, the acute Aretæus did not hesitate to refer to the heart disease as fainting (syncope), although this represents a rather unusual expansion of the concept typically associated with this term, which usually excludes the chaotic beating of the heart. There are some differences in brain involvement, as while hallucinations signaled a poor prognosis in both diseases, the fatal stupor was unique to the English Sweating Sickness, with no observer mentioning it in the heart disease.

Greater and altogether essential differences between this affection and the English Sweating Sickness appear in another respect. There is every reason to suppose that the cardiac disease first appeared in the time of Alexander the Great, that is to say, at the end of the fourth century before Christ; for the Hippocratic physicians were unacquainted with it, Erasistratus, who was body physician to Seleucus Nicator, and was a universally celebrated professor at Alexandria under the first Ptolemy, being the first to mention it. If that age be compared even superficially with that of Henry the VIIth and Henry the VIIIth; and Africa, Asia Minor, and the South of Europe with England, we shall easily be convinced that the two diseases, notwithstanding the agreement in their main symptoms, could not be the same; moreover, much was comprehended by the ancients under the name of morbus cardiacus, which, on a nearer examination, proves not to be one and the same definite form of morbid action: for sometimes this affection is spoken of as an independent disease; sometimes it is mentioned only as a symptom superadded to others—as a kind of transition from other very various diseases, such as has occurred in modern times. Soranus mentions, as such diseases, continued fevers, accompanied by much heat[480]; and reckons among them the “Causus,” that is, an inflammatory bilious fever, to which Aretæus also 310saw the cardiac disease superadded. These fevers passed, on the fifth or sixth day, into the cardiac disease, and such a transition occurred chiefly on the critical days[481]. In a similar sense Celsus speaks even of Phrenitis, under which name we are here to understand all inflammatory fevers accompanied by violent delirium, with the exception of actual inflammation of the brain. Thus we see that the cardiac disease arose and increased on a very different soil from other diseases, and was, to furnish an ancient example, as far from being independent under these circumstances as lethargy was in similar cases.

Greater and very important differences between this condition and the English Sweating Sickness emerge in another way. There's every reason to believe that the heart disease first appeared during the time of Alexander the Great, which means at the end of the fourth century BC; because the Hippocratic doctors were unaware of it, with Erasistratus, who was the personal physician to Seleucus Nicator and a widely renowned professor in Alexandria under the first Ptolemy, being the first to mention it. If we compare that era, even briefly, with the times of Henry the VII and Henry the VIII, and look at Africa, Asia Minor, and Southern Europe alongside England, it becomes clear that the two diseases, despite the similarities in their main symptoms, could not be the same; moreover, much was included by the ancients under the name of morbus cardiacus, which, upon closer examination, turns out not to be one unified form of disease: sometimes this condition is described as a standalone illness; other times, it is referred to merely as a symptom added to others—like a transition from various other diseases, as has been seen in modern times. Soranus mentions, among such diseases, ongoing fevers marked by intense heat[480]; and includes the “Causus,” which is an inflammatory bilious fever, to which Aretæus also 310 observed the heart disease occurring as an addition. These fevers would transition into heart disease on the fifth or sixth day, mainly on critical days[481]. In a similar vein, Celsus even speaks of Phrenitis, under which we should understand all inflammatory fevers with severe delirium, except for actual brain inflammation. Thus, we see that heart disease developed and intensified in a very different context compared to other diseases and was, to provide an ancient example, as far from being independent in these cases as lethargy was in similar situations.

But there was doubtless an independent idiopathic form of the cardiac disease. Whether this was febrile or not, the most celebrated physicians of ancient times were not agreed. Now, how could they ever have differed upon the subject, if the cardiac disease had always appeared only as a sequela on the fifth or sixth day of inflammatory fevers? Apollophanes, a disciple of Erasistratus, and physician to Antiochus the First, considered it, with his master, as constantly febrile, and his opinion prevailed for a long time: perhaps he was in the right, for it is probable that in the first half of the third century, the disorder was much more violent than at a subsequent period. His celebrated contemporary, Demetrius of Apamea, disciple of Herophilus, affirmed, that he had recognised fever only in the beginning of the disease, and that it disappeared in its further progress. Very soon, most physicians decided that it was not febrile, but Asclepiades distinguished a febrile and a non-febrile form of the cardiac disease, and it is certain that this physician was a very accurate observer. Themison and Thessalus also agreed with him. Aretæus described, in a cursory manner, the febrile form only, and perhaps was not acquainted with any other. Soranus followed, in the essential points, Asclepiades, the founder of his school; and later writers generally regarded the inward heat, the hot breath, and the burning thirst—symptoms which were occasionally less marked, as proofs of the febrile nature of the disease. Numerous theoretical views, belonging to particular schools, of which we do not here treat, were intermingled with these, and upon the whole, that form seems to have been esteemed as non-febrile, in which the signs of feverish excitement appeared less marked. In all cases the cardiac 311disease set in with external coldness, and with a small contracted quick pulse, symptoms which with certainty indicate fever[482].

But there was definitely an independent idiopathic form of cardiac disease. Whether this was fever-related or not, the most renowned physicians of ancient times could not agree. Now, how could they have disagreed on this topic if cardiac disease always showed up only as a consequence on the fifth or sixth day of inflammatory fevers? Apollophanes, a student of Erasistratus and physician to Antiochus the First, thought, along with his master, that it was always fever-related, and his view was widely accepted for a long time. He might have been right, as it's likely that in the first half of the third century, the disorder was much more severe than later on. His famous contemporary, Demetrius of Apamea, a student of Herophilus, claimed that he recognized fever only at the onset of the disease and that it faded as it progressed. Soon enough, most physicians concluded that it wasn't fever-related, but Asclepiades differentiated between a fever-related and a non-fever-related form of cardiac disease, and it's clear that he was a very keen observer. Themison and Thessalus also agreed with him. Aretæus briefly described only the fever-related form, and he might not have been familiar with any other. Soranus generally followed, in key aspects, Asclepiades, the founder of his school; and later writers typically viewed the internal heat, hot breath, and burning thirst—symptoms that were sometimes less pronounced—as evidence of the disease's feverish nature. Numerous theoretical perspectives from specific schools, which we won't delve into here, were mixed in with these, and overall, that form seemed to be regarded as non-fever-related, where signs of feverish excitement appeared less obvious. In any case, cardiac disease began with external coldness and a small, rapid pulse, symptoms that definitely indicate fever. 311

Respecting the course of the cardiac disease, we are not furnished with sufficient information. It was no doubt very rapid, for the frame could not long endure symptoms of so violent a kind, and the disorder must of necessity soon have come to a crisis; yet from the ample directions for treatment, we may conclude that it lasted at least some days. If the perspiration was well surmounted, patients seemed to recover rapidly, and their sufferings appeared to them, according to the expressions of Aretæus, like a dream, out of which they awoke to a consciousness of the increased acumen of their senses[483]. But the termination was not always so fortunate. The disease was very dangerous, and in many, after the occurrence of an incomplete crisis, an insidious fever remained behind, which ended in a consumption[484]. The whole phenomenon was altogether peculiar, and among existing diseases there are none which bear any comparison with it.

We don’t have enough information about the progression of the heart disease. It was likely very quick, as the body couldn’t sustain such intense symptoms for long, and the condition must have reached a critical point soon. However, from the detailed treatment instructions, we can infer that it lasted at least a few days. If the sweating was effectively managed, patients seemed to recover quickly, and their suffering felt to them, as described by Aretæus, like a dream, from which they woke up with heightened awareness of their senses[483]. But the outcome wasn’t always so lucky. The disease was quite severe, and many experienced an incomplete recovery, followed by a persistent, subtle fever that ultimately led to a wasting illness[484]. The entire situation was unique, and there are no other known diseases that compare to it.

There must therefore have been something in the whole state of existence among the ancients which favoured the formation of the cardiac disease. That it arose oftener in summer than in winter, that it attacked men more frequently than women, and especially young people full of life, and hot-blooded plethoric persons, who used much bodily exercise, we learn from credible observers[485]. In this respect, therefore, it bore a resemblance to the English Sweating Sickness. We may also add, that indigestion, repletion, drunkenness, as likewise grief and fear, but especially vomiting and the employment of the bath after dinner, occasioned an attack of the malady[486]. Let us call to mind the habits of the ancients. It was in the time of Alexander that oriental luxury was first introduced. Gluttony became a part of the enjoyment of life, and warm baths a necessary refinement in sensuality, which just at this time were philosophically established by Epicurus; nor was this the last instance in which philosophers encouraged the errors and infirmities of human society.

There must have been something about life in ancient times that contributed to the development of heart disease. It occurred more often in summer than in winter, affected men more than women, and especially targeted young, lively, and hot-blooded individuals who engaged in a lot of physical activity, as noted by credible observers[485]. In this way, it was similar to the English Sweating Sickness. Additionally, we can mention that issues like indigestion, overeating, heavy drinking, along with grief and fear, especially vomiting and taking baths after meals, triggered episodes of the illness[486]. Let's think about the habits of the ancients. It was during the time of Alexander that lavish Eastern luxury began to take hold. Gluttony became part of life's pleasures, and warm baths were seen as a necessary indulgence for sensuality, which at that time was philosophically supported by Epicurus; this wasn't the last time philosophers promoted the flaws and weaknesses of human society.

312

312

Here, again, therefore, as in the English Sweating Sickness, we meet with the relaxed state of skin, and the foul repletion engendered by the same indulgence in sensuality which we have found to exist in the sixteenth century. How this corruption of morals increased, and to what a frightful height it was carried among the Romans, it is not necessary here further to elucidate; and we may take it for a fact, that in consequence of it, the general constitution of the ancients underwent a peculiar modification; that this relaxation of skin and gross repletion were propagated from generation to generation; and that, as among chronic diseases, those of a gouty character were its more frequent results, so among the inflammatory, the cardiac disease made its appearance as the general effect of this kind of life.

Here, once again, just like in the English Sweating Sickness, we encounter the relaxed condition of the skin, and the excessive fullness caused by the same indulgence in sensuality that we noted in the sixteenth century. It's not necessary to explain further how this moral decay grew and reached frightening extremes among the Romans; it’s enough to acknowledge that, as a result, the overall health of the ancients underwent a distinct change. This relaxation of the skin and physical excess were passed down through generations, and, just as with chronic conditions, those of a gouty nature were more common outcomes, while among the inflammatory conditions, heart disease emerged as the general result of this lifestyle.

Where, however, such a system of life existed among whole communities, the original and peculiar occasion was not needed in every individual case to bring the predisposition for a disease which propagated itself by hereditary taint, to an actual eruption. Shocks to the constitution of quite a different kind were often sufficient for the purpose. Thus, among the Romans, it was by no means always the case, that gluttony and relaxation of the skin immediately gave rise to the cardiac disease; while, on the other hand, the usual faintness, induced by too copious blood-letting, passed into this impetuous agitation of the heart, accompanied by colliquative sweats[487]; and all overviolent perspirations in other diseases were apt to take the same dangerous course[488]. We must here also take into account a practice among the Romans, which was very injurious, and yet rendered sacred by the laws; namely, visiting the public baths late in the evening, just after the principal meal, and awaiting the digestion of their food in these places of soft indulgence[489]. How much must the tendency of sweating disorders have been favoured by these means!

Where such a lifestyle existed among entire communities, the specific original cause wasn't necessary in every individual case to trigger the hereditary predisposition for a disease. Different types of shocks to the body were often enough. For instance, among the Romans, it wasn't always the case that overeating and skin relaxation immediately led to heart disease; conversely, the usual weakness caused by excessive bloodletting could lead to intense heart agitation, accompanied by severe sweating[487]; and extreme sweating in other illnesses could follow the same dangerous path[488]. We also need to consider a harmful practice among the Romans, which, despite being dangerous, was deemed sacred by their laws; namely, going to the public baths late in the evening right after their main meal and waiting for their food to digest in those places of comfort[489]. This practice likely contributed significantly to the prevalence of sweating disorders!

Surmises founded on the facts already stated, can alone be 313offered respecting the nature of the ancient cardiac disease. The ancients give us no certain intelligence upon it; for their mode of observing did not lead to that object at which modern medicine aims. That the cardiac disease was not of a rheumatic character seems deducible from several circumstances—from the quality of the atmosphere in southern climates, which is not so favourable to rheumatic maladies, as to give rise to a distinctly defined form of that complaint throughout a period of five hundred years; from the nature of the so-called inflammatory fever, which exhibited no rheumatic symptoms in its course; and lastly, from the treatment of the cardiac disease, for it was a common practice to cool down the “diaphoretic” patients in the midst of their perspiration, by sponging them with cold water, to expose them to the air, and some physicians went so far as to advise cold baths and affusions[490]. How could they have ventured upon such remedies if the cardiac disease had been of a rheumatic nature?

Surmises based on the facts already mentioned can only be 313 presented regarding the nature of the ancient heart disease. The ancients don’t provide us with certain information about it; their way of observing didn’t aim at the objectives that modern medicine pursues. It seems clear that the heart disease was not rheumatic based on several factors: the climate in southern regions, which is not as conducive to rheumatic conditions, would not lead to a clearly defined form of that illness over five hundred years; the nature of the so-called inflammatory fever, which showed no rheumatic symptoms throughout its progression; and finally, the treatment of the heart disease, where it was common to cool “diaphoretic” patients in the middle of their sweating with cold water, expose them to air, and some doctors even recommended cold baths and dousing[490]. How could they have used such treatments if the heart disease had been rheumatic?

In the sweating fevers of the sixteenth century, every abrupt refrigeration, every exposure of the skin, was fatal. It is thence to be inferred, that the English Sweating Sickness differed from the ancient cardiac disease in its rheumatic character; even although both diseases were founded in common on an impure gross repletion and relaxation of skin, and the essential phenomena of both went through the same course: not to advert to other differences which are manifest from what has been stated.

In the intense fevers of the sixteenth century, any sudden cooling or exposure of the skin was deadly. This suggests that the English Sweating Sickness was different from the ancient heart disease due to its rheumatic nature; even though both conditions shared a common foundation in an excess and relaxation of the skin, and their main symptoms followed the same pattern: not to mention other differences that are clear from what has been said.

The remaining treatment of the cardiac disorder should not be altogether passed over in this place, because it shews very clearly the general style of thinking of the medical profession, as also certain metaphysical excitations which are innate in that profession, and of which there is therefore a repetition in all ages. For whilst some proceeded with commendable care and caution, and Aræteus feared[491] a fatal result from the slightest error, others again, would fain render excited nature obedient to their rough command by means of the most violent remedies. It, therefore, occasionally happened that in their over hasty activity they were unable to distinguish between a salutary perspiration 314and a dangerous “diaphoresis.” This they suppressed at all hazards, and thus sent their patients to the shades of their fathers. Others forthwith flew to Chrysippic bandaging, the great means of suppressing profuse evacuations, and even violent spasms[492]. Others were for obviating the debility as quickly as possible by means of nourishing diet; and overloaded the stomach, as if the recovery of strength depended entirely upon eating. Others allowed as much wine as possible to be drunk for twenty-four hours together, even to the extent of producing intoxication[493]; and Asclepiades selected for this extraordinary death-bed carousal the Greek salt wine[494], for the sake of bringing on a diarrhœa, whereby the opened pores of the skin might again close, and the too mobile atoms might be carried towards the bowels. With the same object he ordered active clysters[495], for if they succeeded in causing a full evacuation, he maintained that the perspiration must necessarily be arrested! Endemus, of the Methodic sect, recommended even clysters of cold water[496], and whatever else the rashness of medical men had fool-hardily contrived; acting on the ancient notion, that severe diseases always required violent remedies. Aretæus recommended blood-letting, which others pronounced to be nothing short of certain death[497]. He had, however, a notion that the Causus was the foundation of the cardiac disease, and perhaps he was right.

The remaining treatment for the heart condition shouldn't be overlooked here because it clearly shows the general mindset of the medical profession, along with some inherent philosophical tensions that have repeated through the ages. While some practitioners approached it with admirable caution and care, fearing fatal consequences from the slightest mistake, others attempted to assert control over nature with harsh treatments. This sometimes led to confusion between beneficial sweating and dangerous "diaphoresis." They suppressed the latter at all costs, often leading to their patients' demise. Some rushed to use Chrysippic bandaging, a widely used method to stop excessive discharges and even severe spasms. Others tried to combat weakness as quickly as possible with rich food, overloading the stomach as if recovery depended solely on eating. Some permitted their patients to consume as much wine as they could for twenty-four hours, even to the point of intoxication, while Asclepiades chose Greek salt wine for its ability to induce diarrhea, hoping to close open skin pores and redirect the restless elements toward the intestines. He also prescribed strong enemas, believing that a thorough evacuation would inevitably stop sweating! Endemus from the Methodic school even recommended cold water enemas and whatever else the recklessness of physicians had foolishly devised, clinging to the old belief that serious illnesses required extreme treatments. Aretæus suggested bloodletting, which some believed was a certain path to death. He seemed to think that the fever was the root cause of the heart disease, and he might have been right.

A cautious employment of wine was apparently of great use[498], and what may excite surprise, physicians gave detailed and frivolous precepts on the choice and enjoyment of food. If the irritable stomach rejected this repeatedly, they even went so far, according to the Roman method, as to make the patient vomit both before and after his meals, in order that the organ might thus bear the repeated use of nourishment. It was also asserted that the stomach retained food and wine better if the 315body were previously rubbed all over with bruised onions[499]. All this affords us an insight into the nature of this remarkable disease, which has now so completely vanished from the world. Finally, when astringent decoctions proved fruitless, particular confidence was placed in the application of various powders[500] to the surface of the body, conjointly with the use of light bed-clothes and the avoidance of feather-beds, which the effeminacy of the ancients had already introduced[501]. As astringents they selected pomegranate bark, the leaves of roses, blackberries, and myrtles, as also fullers’ earth, gypsum, alum, litharge, slaked lime[502], and, when nothing else was at hand, even common road dust[503]! The efficacy of some of these extraordinary remedies cannot be denied. At least it has been proved in modern times with respect to alkalies, which are of a somewhat similar nature, that they are of great service where there is an abundant determination of acid towards the skin, and it is very probable that the perspiration of these diaphoretic patients contained much acid.

A careful use of wine seemed to be very helpful[498], and surprisingly, doctors gave detailed and trivial advice on choosing and enjoying food. If a sensitive stomach rejected food multiple times, they even went as far as to make the patient vomit both before and after meals, following the Roman method, so that the stomach could handle the repeated intake of food. They also claimed that the stomach retained food and wine better if the 315 body was first rubbed all over with crushed onions[499]. All this provides insight into the nature of this strange disease, which has now completely disappeared from the world. Lastly, when astringent herbal mixtures didn’t work, there was a strong belief in applying various powders[500] to the skin, along with using light bedclothes and avoiding featherbeds, which the luxury of the ancients had already introduced[501]. For astringents, they chose pomegranate bark, rose leaves, blackberries, myrtle, as well as fuller's earth, gypsum, alum, litharge, slaked lime[502], and, when nothing else was available, even plain road dust[503]! The effectiveness of some of these unusual remedies cannot be denied. At least, it has been shown in modern times that alkalies, which are somewhat similar, are very beneficial when there is excess acid on the skin, and it is likely that the sweat of these sweating patients contained a lot of acid.

Sect. 2.—The Picardy Sweat.

(Suette des Picards—Suette Miliaire.)

The Picardy Sweat is a decided miliary fever, which has often prevailed, not only in Picardy, but also in other provinces of France, for more than a hundred years, and even at the present time exists in some places as an endemic disease[504]. We have pointed out the affinity between the English Sweating Sickness and miliary fever. Both are rheumatic fevers—the former of twenty-four hours’ duration, the latter running a course of at least seven days. In the former there was no eruption, or if in isolated cases an eruption made its appearance, it was doubtless subordinate, not essential. In the miliary fever, on the contrary, the eruption is so essential, that this disease may be considered as a completely exanthematous form of rheumatic fever.

The Picardy Sweat is a specific type of miliary fever that has been common not just in Picardy, but also in other regions of France, for over a hundred years, and it still occurs as an endemic disease in some areas today[504]. We've noted the connection between the English Sweating Sickness and miliary fever. Both are types of rheumatic fevers—the former lasts about twenty-four hours, while the latter lasts for at least seven days. In the former, there was no rash, or if there was a rash in rare cases, it was likely minor and not crucial. In contrast, the rash in miliary fever is so important that this disease can be seen as a fully exanthematous form of rheumatic fever.

The history of miliary fever is full of important facts, and the sweating fever of Picardy forms but a variety of it. The eruption in itself is of very ancient occurrence, and was most probably, as at 316present, observed time immemorial in conjunction with petechiæ, occurring as a critical metastasis in the oriental glandular plague, perhaps even in the ancient plague recorded by Thucydides. It also occasionally accompanied petechial fever, as unquestionably it did small-pox and many other diseases, in the same manner as we now see; for the miliary eruption is a very common symptom, which is easily induced, and increases the danger of various other accidental complications. This is different, however, from the idiopathic miliary fever, which did not exist either before, or even at the period of the English Sweating Sickness, but occurred as an epidemic, frequently mentioned in Saxony, a hundred years later[505], (1652.)

The history of miliary fever is packed with significant information, and the sweating fever of Picardy is just one variation of it. The rash itself is very old, likely observed since ancient times, often seen alongside petechiae as a key symptom in the oriental glandular plague, and maybe even in the ancient plague described by Thucydides. It also sometimes appeared with petechial fever, as it clearly did with smallpox and many other illnesses, just like we see today; because the miliary rash is a common symptom, easily triggered, and can increase the risk of other complications. However, this is distinct from the idiopathic miliary fever, which didn't exist either before or during the time of the English Sweating Sickness. It emerged as an epidemic, frequently noted in Saxony a hundred years later[505], (1652.)

We cannot, therefore, consider this eruptive disease as having proceeded from the English Sweating Sickness, in the same manner as the petechial fever had its probable origin in the glandular plague, even supposing a more decided inclination of the Sweating Sickness to the eruptive character could be proved than is possible from the facts afforded. A whole century intervened, and what vast national revolutions!

We can't, therefore, view this eruptive disease as having come from the English Sweating Sickness, in the same way that petechial fever likely originated from the glandular plague, even if we could prove a stronger tendency of the Sweating Sickness to have an eruptive nature than what the available facts show. A whole century passed, and what significant national changes occurred!

This same separation of so long a period makes also against the supposition, that the English Sweating Sickness was an interrupted miliary fever, which exhausted its power by a too luxuriant activity of the skin on the first day, before the eruption made its appearance. Moreover, the similarity and isolation of all the five epidemic sweating fevers, as regards the brevity of the course of the disease, and the absence of all transition forms of any duration, which certainly would have existed had nature intended gradually to form a miliary fever out of the English Sweating Sickness, lead to the same conclusion.

This long separation period also argues against the idea that the English Sweating Sickness was a type of interrupted miliary fever, which drained its energy too quickly due to excessive skin activity on the first day before the rash showed up. Additionally, the similarities and uniqueness of all five epidemic sweating fevers, in terms of the short duration of the illness and the lack of any transitional forms lasting a significant time— which would definitely have appeared if nature had intended to gradually develop a miliary fever out of the English Sweating Sickness—support the same conclusion.

But to return to the miliary fever. Some forms of this disease have been observed, in which a profuse perspiration, in combination with nervous symptoms, has endangered life on the first day of the attack; equally often, too, the eruption has appeared fully formed on the very first day; and if we duly consider, as we ought, the regular course of miliary fever whenever it has assumed an epidemic character, we shall always find, even in that case, a development of symptoms differing fundamentally 317from those of the English Sweating Sickness. If, occasionally, instances of miliary fever occurred, in which no eruption came out, as was the case recently (in 1821), they were to be considered in the same light as other acute eruptive diseases, as, for example, scarlet fever, in which nature indulges in a like irregularity, without, however, altering the essence of those diseases. And since, finally, it has been observed in many cases[506], that the miliary eruption could be prevented by the application of cold at the commencement, a distinguished modern physician has attached great consequence to this circumstance, as showing that miliary fever and the English Sweating Sickness were the same disease[507]; but a check of this kind is, at all events, impossible in those miliary fevers where the eruption breaks forth on the first or second day; and moreover, experience tells us, that many other diseases also, such as inflammations, rheumatisms, gastric fevers, and even abdominal typhus, may be arrested in their course, and confined within narrower bounds, so as not to manifest all their symptoms.

But to get back to miliary fever. Some forms of this disease have been seen where heavy sweating, along with nervous symptoms, has threatened life on the very first day of the illness; just as frequently, the rash has shown up fully developed right from day one. If we carefully consider, as we should, the typical progression of miliary fever whenever it has appeared as an epidemic, we will always notice, even then, symptoms that are fundamentally different from those of the English Sweating Sickness. Occasionally, there have been cases of miliary fever where no rash appeared, like what happened recently (in 1821). These should be viewed similarly to other acute eruptive diseases, such as scarlet fever, where nature behaves inconsistently without changing the essence of those diseases. Finally, it's been noted in many cases that the miliary rash could be prevented by applying cold at the onset. A prominent modern physician has given significant importance to this fact, suggesting that miliary fever and the English Sweating Sickness are the same illness; however, such intervention is definitely impossible in those cases of miliary fever where the rash appears on the first or second day. Moreover, experience shows us that numerous other diseases, such as inflammations, rheumatism, gastric fevers, and even abdominal typhus, can also be halted in their progression and remain more contained, so they don't show all their symptoms.

We are, therefore, completely entitled to consider the appearance of the miliary sweating fevers as altogether a novelty, originating in the middle of the 17th century, and having no discoverable connexion with the English Sweating Sickness. There have been in Germany, since the year 1652, many visitations of miliary fever; but this disease did not increase much in extent until about the year 1715, when it spread into France and the neighbouring countries, particularly Piedmont[508], whilst England remained almost entirely free from it. The French 318epidemics were, upon the whole, much more severe than the German; and on this account we select one of the most ancient, and also the most recent of them, in order to give a general view of miliary fever, as compared with the English Sweating Sickness.

We are, therefore, fully justified in viewing the emergence of miliary sweating fevers as a completely new phenomenon that began in the mid-17th century, with no known connection to the English Sweating Sickness. Since 1652, Germany has experienced several outbreaks of miliary fever; however, this illness didn’t significantly spread until around 1715, when it reached France and nearby regions, especially Piedmont[508], while England remained largely unaffected. The French 318epidemics were generally much more severe than the German ones; for this reason, we have chosen one of the oldest and one of the most recent outbreaks to provide an overview of miliary fever in comparison to the English Sweating Sickness.

The miliary fever first appeared in Picardy, in the year 1718, in le Vimeux (Vinnemacus pagus), a district on the north of the Somme and on the south of the Bresle and the department of the Lower Seine. It increased annually in extent; most places in Picardy were visited by it, and it was not long before it was seen in Flanders[509].

The military fever first showed up in Picardy in 1718, in le Vimeux (Vinnemacus pagus), a region north of the Somme and south of the Bresle and the Lower Seine department. It grew each year in scope; most areas in Picardy experienced it, and it didn't take long before it was also seen in Flanders[509].

We are still in possession of a very distinct account, which we will here detail, of an epidemic at Abbeville in the year 1733, where the miliary fever had existed fifteen years previously. There were scarcely any premonitory symptoms, but the disease commenced at once with pinching pains in the stomach, extreme prostration of strength, dull headache, and difficulty of breathing, interrupted by sighing. Patients complained of violent heat, and were bathed in a pungent sweat of foul odour, while nausea was occasionally felt. Sparks appeared before the eyes, and the countenance became flushed. Patients were tormented with burning thirst; and yet the tongue was as moist as in perfect health. The pulse was frequent and undulating, without hardness; and in the course of a few hours, an insufferable itching came on over the whole body, accompanied by distressing jactitation: upon this, thickly studded, red, round pustules, not bigger than mustard-seeds, broke out, wherefrom patients emitted an extremely disagreeable urinous odour, which was imparted to those who were about their persons. Sometimes they had evacuations, at other times they suffered from constipation, but all complained of want of sleep; and when they felt an inclination to doze, they were again aroused by fresh chilliness. Many bled at the nose till they fainted; and with women, the menstrual discharge often appeared, though not at the proper time. The urine was at times deficient in quantity, at others discharged in abundance, and without any critical signs; if pale and plentiful, it betokened delirium; then the eyelids twitched convulsively, a humming noise commenced in the ears, and the patient tossed about 319restlessly. The pulse became strong, irregular, and, like the breathing, very quick. The countenance grew redder and redder; and soon after, the sufferers, as though struck by lightning, were seized with lethargy, and expired, generally in the act of coughing and spitting blood.

We still have a very clear account, which we will detail here, about an outbreak in Abbeville in 1733, where a miliary fever had been present fifteen years earlier. There were hardly any warning signs, and the disease started suddenly with sharp pains in the stomach, extreme exhaustion, dull headaches, and trouble breathing, interrupted by sighing. Patients reported feeling extremely hot and were drenched in a foul-smelling sweat, while they occasionally felt nauseous. Sparks appeared in their vision, and their faces became flushed. They suffered from intense thirst, yet their tongues were as moist as if they were perfectly healthy. Their pulse was rapid and undulating, without hardness; and within a few hours, an unbearable itching spread across their entire bodies, accompanied by restless movements: shortly after, they developed thickly studded, red, round pustules, no larger than mustard seeds, from which they emitted a very unpleasant urinous odor that affected those around them. Sometimes, they had bowel movements, while at other times, they experienced constipation, but all complained of sleeplessness; and when they felt drowsy, they would be jolted awake by fresh chills. Many bled from the nose until they fainted; and for women, menstrual bleeding often occurred, although not at the expected time. The urine was sometimes scant, while at other times it was produced in large amounts, without any critical signs; if it was pale and plentiful, it indicated delirium; then the eyelids would twitch uncontrollably, a buzzing noise would begin in the ears, and the patient would toss about 319restlessly. The pulse became strong, irregular, and, like the breathing, very rapid. Their faces turned redder and redder; and soon after, the sufferers, as if struck by lightning, would fall into lethargy and die, often while coughing and spitting up blood.

Such was the nature of the disease when it attacked many at once: there were, however, several varieties. With some the miliary vesicles broke out on the second day, with others not before the third; and if all went on favourably, they lost their redness on the seventh day, and the skin all over the body scaled off like bran. The fever was sometimes extremely violent; at others, without apparent cause, very mild; at least one might be deceived at the commencement of the attack, by the apparently favourable symptoms; for those who in the morning had scarcely any notable degree of fever, who neither suffered from any anxious sensation nor violent heat, in whom no subsultus tendinum was perceptible, no want of perspiration, nor any retrocession of the eruption, were sometimes towards evening seized with phrenzy, and died in a state of lethargy. Evacuations, which alleviate other diseases, made this miliary fever worse. Favourable symptoms could never be depended on. In the midst of profuse perspiration the patient died, either from constipation or diarrhœa. A copious discharge of urine was a bad sign; composure was succeeded by delirium, cheerfulness by lethargy: the disease was throughout treacherous and disguised. It was particularly necessary for those suffering from pleurisy or any inflammatory fevers to be guarded against its approach. Many fell sacrifices to this epidemic who thought themselves in a state of convalescence; and with such it was easier to foretell than to prevent the consequences. In cases of this kind the miliary vesicles were less red and grew pale sooner; but if the disease attacked a healthy person, then they were redder, and continued longer. Of those who recovered, not a few suffered for many months, nay, even for a whole year, from night perspirations, without fever or sleeplessness, but with an eruption of little miliary vesicles, which disappeared[510] again on the slightest exposure to cold. The later miliary epidemic fevers in France, which are distinguished by the name of the Picardy 320Sweating Sickness, are generally very well described[511]; so much so, that we have few epidemics of modern times whose course and succession we can trace so well. But the epidemic of 1821, which raged in the departments of the Oise, and of the Seine and Oise, from March to October, has been observed by all with the greatest care, including men of distinguished talent[512].

The disease had a particular nature when it struck many people at once: however, there were several kinds. For some, the small spots appeared on the second day, while for others, not until the third; and if everything went well, they lost their redness by the seventh day, and the skin all over the body peeled off like bran. The fever was sometimes extremely intense; at other times, without any clear reason, it was quite mild; at least one could be misled at the beginning of the attack, by the seemingly positive signs; because those who in the morning had barely any notable fever, felt no anxiety or intense heat, showed no twitching of the tendons, had no lack of sweating, nor any retraction of the rash, were sometimes in the evening suddenly overtaken by madness and died in a state of lethargy. Treatments that usually help with other illnesses made this miliary fever worse. Positive signs could never be relied upon. Even in the midst of heavy sweating, the patient could die from either constipation or diarrhea. A large amount of urine was a bad sign; calmness would turn into delirium, happiness into lethargy: the disease was deceitful and hidden throughout. It was particularly important for those suffering from pleurisy or any inflammatory fevers to be cautious of its onset. Many fell victim to this epidemic who believed they were recovering; and with them, it was easier to predict the outcome than to prevent it. In these cases, the small spots were less red and faded sooner; but if the disease attacked a healthy person, then they appeared redder and lasted longer. Among those who recovered, many suffered for many months, even up to a whole year, from night sweats, without fever or sleeplessness, but with an outbreak of tiny miliary spots, which would disappear[510] again with the slightest exposure to cold. The later miliary epidemic fevers in France, known as the Picardy 320Sweating Sickness, are generally well documented[511]; so much so that we have few epidemics in modern times whose progression and pattern we can trace as clearly. However, the epidemic of 1821, which swept through the departments of Oise and Seine and Oise from March to October, has been closely observed by everyone, including many distinguished individuals[512].

We shall give the description of this disease. There were no constant premonitory symptoms; it often broke out quite suddenly, but many complained some days before of debility, despondency, want of appetite, nausea, headache; sometimes also of giddiness and slight chilliness. Many retired to rest in health, and awoke during the night with the disease, covered with a perspiration, which ceased only with death or recovery. With some the sweating was preceded for some hours, or even only for some moments, by a scarcely perceptible feverish commotion, accompanied with burning heat, or with a sensation of pain which ran through every limb, and nearly always with spasms in the stomach. With others the disease announced itself by lacerating rheumatic pains, which gradually increasing, they became bed-ridden. The mouth was foul, the taste at times bitter, the tongue white, more rarely tinged with yellow, and thus it remained till the patient was restored. The sufferer was shortly covered with a thick, peculiarly fetid sweat, that certainly produced alleviation, but became very intolerable to him from its unpleasant stench, which was even communicated to the clothes of the bystanders. In the mean time it was discovered by the pulse, that the fever had considerably abated; but, on the third day, the patient was seized with convulsive spasms in the stomach, great oppression at the chest, and a sensation of suffocation—symptoms which caused him insupportable anguish. These attacks accompanied by hiccup and eructation, continued for several hours, and returned from time to time, an eruption, partly papular, simultaneously breaking out first on the neck, then on the shoulders down to the hands and breast, less frequently on the thighs and face. The little pimples were of a pale red colour and conical, with glistening heads, and between them appeared innumerable small miliary pustules, 321filled with transparent serous fluid, which soon thickened and assumed a whiter hue. At the time and previous to the breaking out of the exanthem, the patient experienced a very severe burning and pricking sensation in the skin, which nevertheless sometimes occurred on the second or fourth day, and which increased sometimes in one part, sometimes in another, when the sweating declined.

We will describe this disease. There were no consistent warning signs; it often appeared suddenly, but many people complained a few days beforehand of weakness, sadness, lack of appetite, nausea, headaches; sometimes also feeling dizzy and slightly chilled. Many went to bed healthy and woke up during the night with the disease, covered in sweat that only stopped with either death or recovery. For some, the sweating was preceded by a barely noticeable feverish sensation, accompanied by a burning heat, or a painful feeling running through every limb, and almost always with stomach cramps. For others, the disease started with severe rheumatic pains, which gradually worsened, leading them to bed rest. The mouth was foul, the taste was sometimes bitter, the tongue was white, and less frequently yellow-tinged, and it stayed that way until the patient recovered. The sufferer was soon covered with a thick, particularly foul-smelling sweat, which definitely provided some relief but became unbearable due to its unpleasant odor, which even clung to the clothes of those nearby. Meanwhile, it was observed by the pulse that the fever had significantly lessened; however, on the third day, the patient experienced convulsive stomach cramps, severe chest tightness, and a feeling of suffocation—symptoms that caused tremendous suffering. These episodes, accompanied by hiccups and burping, lasted for several hours and recurred intermittently, while a rash, partly raised, emerged first on the neck, then on the shoulders to the hands and chest, and less frequently on the thighs and face. The small bumps were pale red and conical, with shiny tops, and in between them, there appeared countless tiny blisters filled with clear fluid that soon thickened and became whiter. At that time, and before the rash broke out, the patient felt a very intense burning and prickling sensation on the skin, which sometimes occurred on the second or fourth day, and which would intensify in one area or another as the sweating subsided.

Towards the fifth day, however, after the sweating had entirely ceased, the complaint grew worse again. The spasms and paroxysms of suffocation returned, and they were succeeded by renewed eruptions of the exanthem; a decided improvement, however, shortly took place; the little pimples lost their redness, the miliary vesicles dried away, and at a period from the seventh to the tenth day recovery commenced under a general exfoliation of the cuticle. Sometimes the eruption did not appear, whether the patients were under medical treatment, or left to their own guidance, but with those few in whom there was an absence of miliary vesicles, that peculiar pricking and itching of the skin did not take place.

Towards the fifth day, however, after the sweating had completely stopped, the symptoms worsened again. The spasms and bouts of suffocation returned, followed by new eruptions of the rash; however, a clear improvement soon occurred. The little pimples lost their redness, the tiny blisters dried up, and between the seventh and tenth day, recovery began with a general shedding of the skin. Sometimes the rash didn't show up, whether the patients were receiving medical treatment or managing on their own, but in those few cases where there were no tiny blisters, that distinct pricking and itching of the skin didn't happen.

Between the fifth and seventh day the patients usually complained of great weakness, and had a desire to eat. A few tablespoonfuls of wine then agreed with them very well; for the rest, neither thirst nor lethargy was observable, but it was particularly remarkable that the urine was clear and abundant. Up to the seventh day a confined state of bowels was usual, and, with the exception of the already mentioned attacks of tightness and oppression, the breathing remained free, though with great sleeplessness, during the whole malady. Nothing morbid was to be observed in the chest, and the patients lay stretched out at full length, so that there was no occasion at any time to raise their heads.

Between the fifth and seventh day, the patients usually reported feeling very weak and had an urge to eat. A few tablespoons of wine seemed to go down well with them; besides that, neither thirst nor lethargy was noticeable, but it was especially remarkable that the urine was clear and plentiful. Until the seventh day, constipation was common, and except for the previously mentioned feelings of tightness and pressure, their breathing was easy, although they experienced significant sleeplessness throughout the illness. Nothing abnormal was found in the chest, and the patients lay flat, so there was no need to lift their heads at any time.

Such was the regular course of this miliary fever, but its progress was often accelerated by very dangerous symptoms, and occasionally it proved fatal within a very few hours. If at the time of the attack the patients were very restless and talkative, the eyes glistening, the pulse, without being hard, tumultuous, and the edges of the tongue reddened, delirium soon succeeded and then convulsions and death. Great depression of the spirits was a very bad symptom; bleeding was never of any avail, yet the menstrual discharge did not interrupt the course of the disease. There was in general a great degree of malignancy perceptible in the malady, as was also rendered apparent322 by the course of the epidemic. If the miliary Sweating Fever broke out in a fresh place, two or three persons only were thereupon attacked, and that favourably, which led to a supposition that the evil had all passed away, for during the next fifteen or twenty days, not any fresh attacks were heard of. Suddenly, however, the epidemic reappeared with increased virulence. The great number of the sufferers spread consternation and terror amongst the inhabitants, and the cases of death became frequent. After this first burst of fury, the epidemic grew more mild again, so that many patients were not confined to their beds at all. This mitigation of the miliary fever was likewise manifested[513] by the prolongation of its course beyond the seventh day.

Such was the typical course of this miliary fever, but its progression was often sped up by very dangerous symptoms, and sometimes it turned fatal within just a few hours. If the patients were very restless and talkative during the attack, with shiny eyes, a tumultuous but not hard pulse, and a reddened tongue, delirium soon followed, leading to convulsions and death. A significant drop in spirits was a very bad sign; bleeding never helped, yet menstrual discharge did not interrupt the disease's course. Overall, there was a notable level of malignancy present in the illness, which was also evident by the way the epidemic progressed. When the miliary Sweating Fever broke out in a new location, only two or three people were initially affected, and they seemed to recover well, leading to the assumption that the danger had passed; for the next fifteen or twenty days, no new cases were reported. However, the epidemic suddenly returned with increased severity. The large number of sufferers caused panic and fear among the residents, and deaths became frequent. After this initial wave of intensity, the epidemic became milder again, with many patients not needing to stay in bed at all. This easing of the miliary fever was also shown by its duration extending beyond the seventh day.

If we compare this epidemic with the one observed at Abbeville in 1773, we shall find between them but very trifling differences, which would appear still more clearly in some of the intermediate visitations, thus conforming to what has been observed in other eruptive maladies. It is consequently evident that the miliary fevers[514] which have appeared in France in recent times, do not differ in any essential point from those of more ancient date. The surest proof of their identity is, their persistence for nearly two centuries; and from the manner in which they have presented themselves to observation, they are to be considered as distinct from the English Sweating Sickness, though certainly allied to it. It would exceed our limits to pursue this inquiry further, but it may be as well to give the following short catalogue[515] of the most important miliary epidemics.

If we compare this epidemic to the one that happened in Abbeville in 1773, we'll find that the differences between them are minimal. These differences become even clearer when looking at some of the intermediate outbreaks, which aligns with what has been seen in other eruptive diseases. Therefore, it’s clear that the miliary fevers[514] that have appeared in France recently are not fundamentally different from those in the past. The strongest evidence of their similarity is their persistence over nearly two centuries; and based on how they've been observed, they should be regarded as distinct from the English Sweating Sickness, even though they are definitely related. We can't go into further detail on this topic here, but it might be useful to provide the following brief list[515] of the most significant miliary epidemics.

1652. Leipzig.
1660. Augsburg.
1666. Bavaria.
1672. Hungary.
1675. Hamburgh.
1680. Germany to a great extent.
1689. Philippsburg.
1690. Stuttgard.
Düsseldorf.
Erfurt.
Jena.
1694. Berlin.
3231700. Breslau.
1709. Dantzic, Marienburg.
1712. Mümpelgart.
1713. Saint Valery. (Somme.)
1714, 15. Laybach.
1715. Breslau.
Turin.
1718. Tübingen.
Abbeville. (Somme.)
1720. Canton de Bray. (Lower Seine.)
1723. Francfort on the Maine.
1724. Turin.
Vercelli.
1726. Acqui.
Guise. (Aisne.)
1728. Chambéry, Annecy, St. Jean de Maurienne. (Savoy.)
Carmagnola.
Vercelli.
Ivrea.
Biella.
1729. Vienna. (Austria.)
1730. Pignerol.
1731. Fossano.
1732. Nizza.
Rivoli.
1733. Fossano.
Asti.
Lanti.
Acqui.
Basle.
Silesia.
1734. Strasburg. (Lower Rhine.)
Acqui.
Lanti.
1735. Trino.
Lanti.
Fresneuse. (Lower Seine.)
Vimeux. (Seine et Oise.)
Orleans. (Loiret.)
Pluviers. (Loiret.)
Meaux. Villeneuve.
Saint George. (Seine et Marne.)
Bohemia.
Denmark.
Sweden.
Russia.
1738. Luzarches, Royaumont. (Seine et Oise.)
Susa.
Crescentino.
1740. Caen. (Calvados.)
Provins. (Seine et Marne.)
Vire. (Calvados.)
Berthonville. (Eure.)
Falaise. (Calvados.)
1741. Rouen. (Lower Seine.)
Tartana.
Valencia.
Alexandria.
London.
1742. Caudebec. (Lower Seine.)
Ceva.
Turin.
Sorillano.
Alba.
Ivrea.
Cherasco.
Fossano.
1743. Villafranca.
1744. Acqui.
1746. Zurich.
1747. Paris. (Seine.)
Beaumont. (Seine et Oise.)
Chambly. (Oise.)
Modena.
Lodi.
Mantua.
Piacenza.
1750. Schaffhausen.
Bern.
Geneva.
Beauvais. (Oise.)
1751. Villafranca.
3241752. Fernaise. (Seine et Oise.)
1753. Susa.
1754. Valepuiseux. (Seine et Oise.)
1755. Novara.
1756. Cusset. (Allier.)
Boulogne. (Pas de Calais.)
1757. Montaigu les Combrailles. (Puy de Dôme.)
1758. Amiens, environs. (Somme.)
1759. Paris. (Seine.)
Guise. (Aisne.)
Caudebec. (Lower Seine.)
1760. Alençon. (Orne.)
1763. Vire. (Calvados.)
1763, 64. Bayeux. (Calvados.)
1765. Balleroy, Basoques. (Calvados.)
Saint-George, Saint-Quentin. (Calvados.)
1766. Campagny. (Calvados.)
1767. Thinchebray, Truttemer. (Orne.)
1768, 69. St. Quentin. (Aisne.)
1770. Louviers. (Eure.)
1771. Montargis. (Loiret.)
1772. Hardivilliers, environs.
1773. Hardivilliers. (Oise.)
1776. Laigle. (Orne.)
1777. Jouy. (Seine et Oise.)
1782. Castelnaudary. (Aude.)
Boissy Saint-Léger. (Seine et Oise.)
1783. Beaumont. (Seine et Oise.)
1791. Méru. (Oise.)
1810. Nourare, Villotran. (Oise.)
1812. Rosheim, and many other places. (Lower Rhine.)
1821. La Chapelle, Saint-Pierre and sixty places around. (Oise; Seine et Oise.)

Sect. 3.—The Roettingen Sweating Sickness.

We now come to a phenomenon which, notwithstanding its short duration and very limited extension, is one of the most memorable of this century. Up to the present time, its real importance has not been recognised, because the clouds of self-sufficient ignorance have prevented our taking a survey of the formation of diseases, throughout long periods of time. It has been sunk for an age in the sea of oblivion, from whence we will now draw it forth to the light of day.

We now turn to a phenomenon that, despite its brief existence and narrow scope, is one of the most memorable of this century. Until now, its true significance hasn't been acknowledged, as the clouds of unwarranted ignorance have kept us from examining the development of diseases over long periods. It has been lost in the sea of forgetfulness for ages, but now we will bring it back to light.

In November, 1802, a very hot and dry summer had been succeeded by incessant rain. Thick fogs spread over the country, and enveloped such places in central Germany as were inaccessible to ventilation. Amongst others, the small Franconian town of Roettingen, situated on the river Tauber, and surrounded by mountains[516]. Scarcely had a few weeks elapsed, 325when unexpectedly, towards the 25th of November, an extremely fatal disease broke out in the town, which was without example in the memory of its inhabitants, and totally unknown to the physicians of the country.

In November 1802, a very hot and dry summer had been followed by nonstop rain. Thick fogs spread across the country and shrouded places in central Germany that lacked proper ventilation. Among these was the small Franconian town of Roettingen, situated on the river Tauber and surrounded by mountains[516]. Just a few weeks later, around November 25th, a highly lethal disease unexpectedly broke out in the town, one that was unprecedented in the memories of its residents and completely unknown to the local doctors.

Strong vigorous young men were suddenly seized with unspeakable dread; the heart became agitated and beat violently against the ribs, a profuse, sour, ill-smelling perspiration broke out over the whole body, and at the same time, they experienced a lacerating pain in the nape of the neck, as if a violent rheumatic fever had taken possession of the tendinous tissues. This pain ceased sometimes very quickly, and if it then shifted to the chest, the distressing palpitation of the heart recommenced; a spasmodic trembling of the whole body ensued; the sufferers fainted, their limbs became rigid, and thus they breathed their last. In most cases, all this occurred within four and twenty hours. They did not all, however, succumb under the first attack, but as soon as the accelerated pulse had sunk to the lowest ebb of smallness and feebleness, a corresponding effect being observable in the respiration, the violent pain would in some cases return to the outward parts. The patient then felt a benumbing pressure and stiffness in the nape of the neck; and the pulse and respiration became restored again as in health, but the perspiration continued to pour incessantly down the skin.

Strong, robust young men were suddenly hit with an indescribable fear; their hearts became agitated and pounded violently against their ribs, and a profuse, sour, foul-smelling sweat covered their entire bodies. At the same time, they felt a sharp pain in the back of their necks, as if a severe rheumatic fever had taken hold of their tendons. This pain sometimes faded quickly, but if it then moved to the chest, the troubling palpitation of the heart would start again; the body would tremble spasmodically, and those affected would faint, their limbs becoming rigid, and thus they would draw their last breath. In most cases, all this happened within twenty-four hours. However, not everyone succumbed to the first attack, but as soon as the rapid heartbeat fell to a weak and barely noticeable level, a similar effect could be seen in their breathing, and in some cases, the intense pain would return to the outer parts. The patient would then feel a numbing pressure and stiffness in the back of their neck; the pulse and breathing would return to normal like in a healthy state, but the sweat would keep pouring down their skin nonstop.

This apparent safety was, however, very deceptive, for a renewed palpitation of the heart unexpectedly commenced, accompanied by a feeble pulse; and then death was often inevitable. It was remarkable, that the patients, though bathed in perspiration, had very little thirst, and the tongue was not dry, nor ever even foul, but retained its natural moisture. With most, however, the urine was scanty; as the skin, under the increasing debility, permitted too much fluid to stream forth through its pores. If the disease passed off without heating sudorifics, then in general no eruption made its appearance. The malady then continued till the sixth day, but on the first only, did it display its malignant symptoms, for by the second, the sweating diminished and lost every unfavourable quality, so that increased transpiration of the skin, without any other symptoms of importance, alone remained, and on the sixth day the patient was perfectly restored.

This apparent safety was, however, very misleading, as a renewed heart palpitation unexpectedly started, along with a weak pulse; and often, death was unavoidable. It was noteworthy that the patients, despite being drenched in sweat, had very little thirst, and their tongues were neither dry nor dirty, but maintained their natural moisture. For most, however, the urine was scarce; as the skin, under increasing weakness, allowed too much fluid to escape through its pores. If the illness resolved without heating sweat-inducing treatments, then usually no rash appeared. The sickness continued until the sixth day, but on the first day only, did it show its severe symptoms, as by the second, the sweating decreased and lost any negative qualities, so that only increased perspiration of the skin remained, without any other significant symptoms, and by the sixth day, the patient was fully recovered.

326

326

Had there been in Roettingen a physician at hand from the commencement, well skilled in medical history, and who would have adopted the old English treatment of the Sweating Sickness, this new fever would have appeared but as a perfectly mild disease, and would certainly have carried off but few of the inhabitants of this peaceful little town. As it was, however, the scenes of Lübeck and Zwickau were renewed, and it seemed as if the innumerable victims to the hot treatment, and to Kegeler’s truculent medical work, had descended to the grave in vain. The sufferers were, as in the sixteenth century, literally stewed to death! for the moment the people imagined that they knew how nature meant to escape, they ordered feather-beds to be heaped on the perspiring patient, so that the mouth and nose alone remained uncovered. Doors and windows were tightly closed, and the stove emitted a glowing heat, whilst a most intolerable odour of perspiration streamed forth from beneath the broad and lofty beds; added to which, that two and even more patients were often lying in the same room; nay, even stowed together under the same mountain of feathers, and in order that inward heat might not be wanting, pots of theriaca were swallowed, and the patient was incessantly plied with elder electuary. Thus the bad humours were expelled together with the perspiration; and whether the sufferers were suffocated, or surmounted, as by a miracle, this mal-treatment of nature, a conviction was felt, that the most salutary remedies had been employed, and when at last, eruptions of various colours broke out, it was considered as certain, that the poison had been carried off in them. The citizens of Roettingen, therefore, fell into the same erroneous opinion, which, upheld by medical schools, had, time immemorial, increased inflammatory diseases, particularly the exanthematous, and caused them to become malignant. The above-mentioned eruptions were of various sorts; miliary vesicles of every form and colour, filled with an acrid fluid; actual blistery eruptions, (pemphigus,) and even petechiæ; and it is to be observed, that the patients, during the first days of the sweating fever, never suffered from that peculiar pricking sensation over the whole body, which precedes the eruption of miliaria, but complained only, and that not always, of a local itching, where the eruption had broken out. It was equally rare to observe a regular desquamation of the skin,327 and it is therefore to be assumed, that the eruptions were only symptomatic, and not by any means necessarily connected with the disease, as in the decidedly miliary fevers.

Had there been a doctor in Roettingen from the beginning, well-versed in medical history, who would have used the traditional English treatment for the Sweating Sickness, this new fever would have seemed like a mild illness and would likely have claimed few lives in this peaceful little town. However, instead, the horrific scenes from Lübeck and Zwickau were repeated, and it felt as though the countless victims of the harsh treatments and Kegeler’s cruel medical practices had met their end in vain. The sufferers were, as in the sixteenth century, literally cooked to death! The moment people thought they understood how nature intended to heal, they piled feather beds on the sweating patients, leaving only their mouths and noses uncovered. Doors and windows were tightly shut, and the stove blasted heat, while an unbearable stench of sweat filled the air from beneath the broad, high beds. Often, two or more patients shared the same room, even crammed together under the same mountain of feathers. To generate even more internal heat, they swallowed pots of theriaca and were constantly fed elder electuary. Thus, the harmful humors were expelled along with the sweat; whether the patients suffocated or miraculously survived, there was a belief that the most effective remedies had been used. When various-colored eruptions finally appeared, it was thought to be certain that the poison had been expelled with them. The citizens of Roettingen, therefore, fell into the same misguided belief, which, supported by medical institutions, had long perpetuated inflammatory diseases, especially the exanthematous ones, causing them to turn malignant. The aforementioned eruptions varied in type; miliary vesicles of every shape and color filled with an irritating fluid; actual blistering eruptions (pemphigus); and even petechiae. It is worth noting that during the first days of the sweating fever, patients did not experience that specific prickling sensation all over their bodies that usually precedes the eruptions of miliaria; instead, they only complained—sometimes—of local itching where the eruptions had appeared. Likewise, a regular shedding of the skin was rarely observed, 327 and it should be assumed that the eruptions were merely symptomatic and not necessarily connected to the disease, as is the case in clearly miliary fevers.

The disease excited, from its very commencement, the greatest consternation; and as it was increased, even from the first days of its appearance, by the sudorific system of treatment, deaths were multiplied; the continual peal of funeral bells struck mortal terror, as of old at Shrewsbury, into the hearts of both sick and healthy; and this oppressed little town was shunned as a pesthole by the inhabitants of the surrounding neighbourhood. At the commencement of the disease, they were entirely without medical advice, till a skilful physician arrived from the vicinity[517], and as most of the inhabitants were already attacked with the sweating fever, he immediately prescribed the proper treatment. But the powers of one man are not sufficient, amid such confusion, to contend with the deeply rooted prejudices of the people, and so they continued in most houses to expel by heat and theriaca both perspiration and life together; till at last, on the third of December, Dr. Sinner of Würzburg arrived, without whom the remembrance of this remarkable disease would have been obliterated, and conjointly with his gallant colleague, like the anonymous physician formerly in Zwickau, subdued the destructive prejudices of the people. He found eighty-four patients[518] under piles of feather-beds, who, when pure air was admitted, breathed once more freely, and by a prudent cooling system, all recovered easily, and without danger, one only excepted. His method reminds us of the old English treatment[519]. The disease was confined entirely to Roettingen, it did not make its appearance anywhere beyond the gates of this little town. On the fifth of December, however, clear, frosty weather set in; from that time no new cases occurred, and all traces of this Roettingen sweating fever, which was never either 328preceded or followed by miliary fever in any part of Franconia, have from that time disappeared.

The disease caused a lot of panic from the very start; and as it worsened, especially in the first days, the treatment involving sweating only made things worse, leading to more deaths. The constant sound of funeral bells created a real sense of dread, much like it did in Shrewsbury, causing both the sick and healthy to feel terror. This small town was avoided like a plague by people from the surrounding area. At the beginning of the outbreak, they had no medical help until a skilled doctor arrived from nearby [517]. Since most of the inhabitants were already suffering from the sweating fever, he quickly recommended the right treatment. However, the efforts of one person couldn’t break through the deep-seated beliefs of the townspeople, who continued to use heat and theriac to try to drive out both sweat and life. Eventually, on December 3rd, Dr. Sinner from Würzburg arrived, and without him, the memory of this remarkable disease would have been forgotten. Along with his brave colleague, he overcame the harmful beliefs held by the people, similar to a previous anonymous physician in Zwickau. He found eighty-four patients [518] piled under feather beds, who began to breathe more easily once fresh air was let in, and with a careful cooling approach, everyone recovered without complications, except for one person. His method is reminiscent of old English treatments [519]. The disease was confined entirely to Roettingen; it didn’t appear anywhere outside the gates of this small town. However, on December 5th, clear, frosty weather began, and from that point on, no new cases emerged. All signs of this Roettingen sweating fever, which was never preceded or followed by miliary fever in any part of Franconia, have since disappeared.

The resemblance of this fever to the English Sweating Sickness is manifest, and is proved even by the short (only ten days’) duration of the visitation, which, as we have stated, is a most essential characteristic of the English sweating epidemic, at least as it appeared in Germany, the miliary epidemics always having lasted a much longer period. But if we confine ourselves merely to the symptoms of the disease, we shall find, that in the Roettingen sweating fever, there are, throughout, none that can be considered essential, except the palpitation of the heart, accompanied with anguish, the profuse perspiration, and the rheumatic pains in the nape of the neck, which never were wanting in any case; and the very same symptoms are clearly and perceptibly to be discerned in like proportion as compared with others, in the representation of the English Sweating Sickness; whereas, the eruptions were altogether as unessential as in the epidemic of the sixteenth century. The irritability of the skin, and tendency to dangerous metastases, were less marked in the Roettingen fever than in the English Sweating Sickness; for the patients could, without injury, change their linen in the midst of the perspiration, which, in the English Sweating Sickness, could not have been done without fatal consequences; but this difference can easily be accounted for, from the greater degree of suffering in the latter disease than in the former. It only now remains to examine the duration of the disease, and here we plainly perceive that the principal paroxysm was over in the Roettingen epidemic within the first four and twenty hours, at least when it was undisturbed by treatment; and the sole symptom which continued until the sixth day—the increased perspiration, (we speak here only of perfectly pure cases,) could only reasonably be regarded as a sequela. The crisis did not occur all on a sudden, as in the English Sweating Sickness, but this cannot constitute any essential difference.

The similarity between this fever and the English Sweating Sickness is clear, especially considering the brief (only ten days’) duration of the illness, which, as we've pointed out, is a key characteristic of the English sweating epidemic, at least as it manifested in Germany, while other miliary epidemics typically lasted much longer. However, if we focus solely on the symptoms of the disease, we will find that in the Roettingen sweating fever, there are none that can be seen as essential except for the palpitations of the heart, accompanied by distress, the excessive sweating, and the rheumatic pain in the neck, which were consistently present in every case; and these same symptoms can be clearly and noticeably compared to those in the English Sweating Sickness; meanwhile, the rashes were just as unimportant as they were in the sixteenth-century epidemic. The sensitivity of the skin and the risk of dangerous complications were less evident in the Roettingen fever than in the English Sweating Sickness; patients could safely change their linens even while sweating, which could not have been done without deadly consequences in the English Sweating Sickness; this difference can easily be explained by the greater level of suffering in the latter disease compared to the former. It remains to look at the duration of the illness, and here we can clearly see that the main phase of the Roettingen epidemic was over within the first twenty-four hours, at least when untreated; the only symptom that lingered until the sixth day—the increased sweating, (we are talking about perfectly clear cases here)—could only reasonably be seen as a consequence. The crisis did not happen suddenly, as it did in the English Sweating Sickness, but this does not create any significant difference.

We do not hesitate, therefore, to pronounce the Roettingen fever to have been the same disease as the English Sweating Sickness. To give, however, this phenomenon its proper interpretation—to have a clear conception of the causes which again drew down from the clouds, into the midst of Germany, this mist-born spectre of 1529, and allowed it to expend its brief fury upon329 a single place, is beyond the power of human wisdom. Science is not comprehensive enough to discover, in the crossings of these unknown comet-paths, the moving causes of this visitation of disease. But as all insight into the works of nature must be preceded by a strict investigation and search after phenomena in all countries, at all times, and under all circumstances of development, so an improved knowledge of diseases and of the whole human system, will not fail to follow, when the investigations of epidemics throughout extensive periods have increased in number and success.

We don't hesitate to say that the Roettingen fever was the same illness as the English Sweating Sickness. However, to properly interpret this phenomenon—to clearly understand the reasons why this mist-born specter reemerged in 1529 and unleashed its brief fury on329 a single location—is beyond human understanding. Science isn't advanced enough to uncover, in the complexities of these unknown comet-paths, the underlying causes of this disease outbreak. But just as any understanding of nature's workings requires a thorough investigation and exploration of phenomena across all countries, times, and developmental circumstances, a better understanding of diseases and the entire human body will surely follow as studies on epidemics become more numerous and successful over extended periods.

The present age demands such a knowledge of medical men, whose vocation it is to investigate life minutely in all its bearings. It demands of them an historical pathology, and to this branch of the study of nature is the present work intended to contribute.

The current era requires medical professionals to have a deep understanding of life in all its aspects. It expects them to have historical knowledge of diseases, and this work aims to contribute to that field of nature study.


329

329

CHRONOLOGICAL SURVEY.


Political Events.

1461–1483. Louis XI.

1461–1483. Louis XI.

1485–1509. Henry VII.

1485–1509. Henry VII.

1493–1519. Maximilian I.
Mercenary troops are introduced.

1493–1519. Maximilian I.
Mercenary soldiers are brought in.

1483–1498. Charles VIII.

1483–1498. King Charles VIII.

1483–1485. Richard III.

1483–1485. King Richard III.

1483, October. First abortive attempt of the Earl of Richmond, (who had fled to France in 1471,) against Richard III.
The Duke of Buckingham executed.

1483, October. The Earl of Richmond, who had escaped to France in 1471, made his first unsuccessful attempt against Richard III.
The Duke of Buckingham was executed.

1485. Richmond obtains support from Charles VIII.

1485. Richmond gets support from Charles VIII.

1485, 25th July. Richmond’s departure from Havre.

1485, July 25. Richmond leaves Havre.

1485, 1st August. Landing at Milford Haven.

1485, August 1st. Arriving at Milford Haven.

1485. From the 1st to the 22d of August, march from Milford Haven to Lichfield and Bosworth.

1485. From August 1st to 22nd, march from Milford Haven to Lichfield and Bosworth.

1485, 22d August. The battle of Bosworth. Richard III.falls. The Earl of Richmond becomes king, under the name of Henry VII.

1485, August 22. The battle of Bosworth. Richard III falls. The Earl of Richmond becomes king, taking the name Henry VII.

3311485, 28th August. Henry’s entry into London.

3311485, August 28th. Henry’s arrival in London.

1485, 30th October. Henry’s coronation.

1485, October 30. Henry's coronation.

1481–1492. The wars of Ferdinand the Catholic, against the Saracens.

1481–1492. The wars of Ferdinand the Catholic against the Saracens.

1495. Useless war for the succession of Charles VIII. against Alfonso II., (who died in 1495,) and Ferdinand II. of Naples. The conquest of the kingdom was again immediately relinquished.

1495. Worthless war for the succession of Charles VIII against Alfonso II, (who died in 1495), and Ferdinand II of Naples. The conquest of the kingdom was again promptly abandoned.

First Visitation of the Sweating Sickness.

1472–1482. Swarms of locusts in the south of Europe.

1472–1482. Swarms of locusts in southern Europe.

1480–1485. Wet years.

1480–1485. Rainy years.

1483. Overflow of the Severn, (the great water of the Duke of Buckingham.)

1483. Flood of the Severn, (the great water of the Duke of Buckingham.)

1480 and 1481. Famine in Germany and France.

1480 and 1481. Food shortage in Germany and France.

1477–1485. Glandular plague in Italy.

1477–1485. Glandular plague in Italy.

1480, 1481. Encephalitis in Germany.

1480, 1481. Encephalitis in Germany.

1482. Febrile cerebritis in France, and epidemic pleuritis in Italy.

1482. Febrile encephalitis in France, and an epidemic of pleurisy in Italy.

1483. Glandular plague in Spain.

1483. Glandular plague in Spain.

1484 and 1485. Malignant fever in Germany and Switzerland.
Plague in Spain.

1484 and 1485. Severe fever in Germany and Switzerland.
Plague in Spain.

1485. In the beginning of August: eruption of the English Sweating Sickness, probably amongst Richmond’s mercenary troops. It spread from west to east, and then in a contrary direction.

1485. At the start of August: outbreak of the English Sweating Sickness, likely among Richmond's hired soldiers. It spread from west to east, and then in the opposite direction.

1485. The end of August, in Oxford.

1485. The end of August, in Oxford.

1485. 21st September till the early part of October, in London.

1485. 21st September to the beginning of October, in London.

1485. The middle of November, in Croyland.

1485. The middle of November, in Croyland.

1486. 1st January. Termination of the first epidemic Sweating Sickness.

1486. 1st January. End of the first outbreak of Sweating Sickness.

1486. Epidemic scurvy in Germany. Plague in Spain.

1486. Outbreak of scurvy in Germany. Plague in Spain.

1488–1490. Plague in Spain.

1488–1490. Pestilence in Spain.

1490. First eruption of petechial fever in Granada, in the army of Ferdinand the Catholic.

1490. First outbreak of petechial fever in Granada, in Ferdinand the Catholic's army.

1495. Eruption of the syphilitic pestilence at Naples, among the mercenary army of Charles VIII.

1495. Outbreak of syphilis in Naples, among the mercenary army of Charles VIII.

1499. Great plague in London.

1499. Major plague in London.

Political Events.

1485–1509. Henry VII.

1485–1509. King Henry VII.

1501. His eldest son, Arthur, marries Catherine of Arragon, daughter of Ferdinand the Catholic.

1501. His oldest son, Arthur, marries Catherine of Aragon, daughter of Ferdinand the Catholic.

1502. Prince Arthur dies. Prince Henry (VIII.), second son of Henry VII., is affianced to Catherine of Arragon.

1502. Prince Arthur dies. Prince Henry (VIII), the second son of Henry VII, is engaged to Catherine of Aragon.

The internal condition of England is altered by Henry VII.The towns begin to rise importance, and the sciences to become diffused. A rigorous and unjust financial system.

The internal situation in England changes under Henry VII. The towns start to gain importance, and knowledge begins to spread. There is a strict and unfair financial system.

3321498–1515. Louis XII.

1498–1515. Louis XII.

1501. conquers Naples in conjunction with the Spaniards, and is by the

1501. conquers Naples together with the Spaniards, and is by the

1504. expelled thence. He establishes his power in Upper Italy.

1504. expelled from there. He establishes his power in Northern Italy.

1511. Pope Julius II. (1503–1513) forms the sacred league against France, into which enters likewise, in 1512, Henry VIII. The French lose their power in Italy.

1511. Pope Julius II. (1503–1513) creates the Holy League against France, which also includes Henry VIII in 1512. The French lose their influence in Italy.

1504. Isabella of Castile dies. Philip I. of Austria, her daughter Johanna’s husband, succeeds her, his son, Charles V., having been born in 1500.

1504. Isabella of Castile dies. Philip I of Austria, her daughter Johanna’s husband, takes over, his son, Charles V, having been born in 1500.

1506. Philip I. dies.

1506. Philip I dies.

1516. Ferdinand the Catholic dies.

1516. Ferdinand the Catholic passes away.

Second Visitation.

1500–1503. Mould-spots (signacula) in Germany and France.

1500–1503. Mould spots (signacula) in Germany and France.

1500. Comet.

1500. Comet.

1500. Mortality among cattle in Germany.

1500. Death rates among cattle in Germany.

1502. Very extensive destruction of cultivation in Germany by blights of caterpillars.

1502. Significant destruction of crops in Germany due to caterpillar plagues.

1503. Glandular plague, and destructive epidemics in Germany and France.

1503. Glandular plague and devastating epidemics in Germany and France.

1504. Plague in Spain.

1504. Plague in Spain.

1504 and 1505. Encephalitis, putrid fever, and malignant pneumonia in Germany.

1504 and 1505. Encephalitis, severe fever, and serious pneumonia in Germany.

1505. Plague in Portugal.

1505. Plague in Portugal.

1505. First epidemic petechial fever in Italy. The morbid activity of the organism shewed a decided determination towards the skin during all this period.

1505. First epidemic petechial fever in Italy. The disease showed a clear focus on the skin throughout this entire period.

1505. Moist summer. Lamentable moral state of England.

1505. Humid summer. Sad moral condition of England.

1506. The summer: the Sweating Sickness breaks out in London, and continues to a moderate extent, being confined to England, until the autumn. This second visitation is the mildest of all, and the old English method of treatment proves effectual everywhere.

1506. In the summer, the Sweating Sickness breaks out in London and continues at a moderate level, staying within England until autumn. This second wave is the mildest of all, and the traditional English treatment method proves effective everywhere.

1506–1508. Pestilential epidemics in Spain.

1506–1508. Disease outbreaks in Spain.

1508. Swarms of locusts in Spain.

1508. Swarms of locusts in Spain.

Political Events.

1509–1547. Henry VIII.

1509–1547. King Henry VIII.

1515–1547. Francis I. immediately attacks Milan again, and conquers.

1515–1547. Francis I. quickly strikes at Milan once more and takes control.

1515. the Swiss, in the battle of Marignano. Keeps possession of Milan, and establishes the French dominion in Italy until the year 1522.

1515. The Swiss, in the Battle of Marignano, maintain control of Milan and establish French dominance in Italy until the year 1522.

1516. Cardinal Wolsey changes the policy of England in favour of Francis I.,

1516. Cardinal Wolsey shifts England’s policy to support Francis I.

1520. then of Charles V.

1520, then of Charles V.

1513–1522. Leo X., against France. Promotes, by a new333 bull of indulgences, the outbreak of the Reformation.

1513–1522. Leo X., against France. Promotes, through a new333 bull of indulgences, the start of the Reformation.

1517. 31st of October, Luther commences the Reformation.

1517. October 31st, Luther begins the Reformation.

1519. 12th January, the Emperor Maximilian I. dies.

1519. January 12th, Emperor Maximilian I passes away.

1519–1556. Charles V.

1519–1556. Charles V.

1521. Imperial diet at Worms.

1521. Imperial Diet at Worms.

1517. May: Insurrections of the operatives in London.

1517. May: Uprisings by the workers in London.

1517. In the autumn and winter, Henry VIII. frequently changes the residence of his Court in consequence of the Sweating Sickness and the Plague.

1517. In the fall and winter, Henry VIII often moves the location of his Court because of the Sweating Sickness and the Plague.

1518. 11th February, Queen Mary is born.

1518. 11th February, Queen Mary is born.

1518. The College of Physicians in London is founded by Linacre.

1518. The College of Physicians in London is established by Linacre.

1521. Henry VIII. opposes Luther, and obtains the title of “Defender of the Faith.” (Thomas More.)

1521. Henry VIII opposes Luther and earns the title of “Defender of the Faith.” (Thomas More.)

Third Visitation.

1515. Pestilential epidemics in Spain.

1515. Disease outbreaks in Spain.

1516. Comet.

1516. Comet.

1517. Unproductive, but not moist summer.

1517. A dry summer that wasn't very effective.

1510. Great influenza (Coqueluche) throughout France, and probably to a still further extent. Plague in the north of Europe.

1510. Major influenza outbreak (whooping cough) across France, and likely even more widespread. Plague in northern Europe.

1517. In the early months epidemic trachæitis and œsophagitis (diphtheritis) in Holland, lasting only eleven days. This epidemic extends towards the south, and appears in the same summer at Bâsle.

1517. In the early months, an outbreak of tracheitis and esophagitis (diphtheritis) occurred in Holland, lasting only eleven days. This outbreak spread south and appeared in the same summer in Basel.

1517. On the 16th June, earthquake in Swabia (and Spain).

1517. On June 16th, an earthquake occurred in Swabia (and Spain).

1517. Encephalitis and other inflammatory fevers in Germany.

1517. Encephalitis and other inflammatory fevers in Germany.

1517 In July, outbreak in London of the third visitation of epidemic sweating sickness; it spreads with great malignity all over England, and among the English at Calais; in the sixth week it attains its greatest violence, and terminates in December. Ammonius, of Lucca, and many distinguished and learned persons in Oxford and Cambridge are carriedoff by it.

1517 In July, there was an outbreak in London of the third wave of epidemic sweating sickness; it spread aggressively throughout England and among the English in Calais. In the sixth week, it became most intense and ended in December. Ammonius from Lucca and many prominent and educated individuals from Oxford and Cambridge were taken by it.

1517. In December, immediately after the Sweating Sickness, a plague occurs in England and lasts all the winter.

1517. In December, right after the Sweating Sickness, a plague breaks out in England and lasts throughout the winter.

1517. Small-pox breaks out in Hispaniola.

1517. Smallpox breaks out in Hispaniola.

Political Events.

1524. October, Francis I. passes Mont Cenis, and is

1524. October, Francis I. crosses Mont Cenis, and is

1525. beaten at Pavia and captured.

1525. defeated at Pavia and taken prisoner.

1526. 14th January. Peace of Madrid.

1526. January 14. Peace of Madrid.

1526. Clement VII. (1523–1534) becomes the head of334 the Holy League against the Emperor.

1526. Clement VII. (1523–1534) becomes the leader of334 the Holy League against the Emperor.

1527. 6th May. Rome is vanquished by the imperial army and sacked.

1527. 6th May. Rome is conquered by the imperial army and plundered.

1528. A French army, under Lautrec, conquers the greatest part of Italy, and commences

1528. A French army, led by Lautrec, takes control of most of Italy and begins

1528. 1st May, the siege of Naples. Lautrec dies in August.

1528. May 1st, the siege of Naples. Lautrec dies in August.

1528. 29th August, the siege of Naples is raised. The remains of the French army are made prisoners.

1528. 29th August, the siege of Naples is lifted. The remaining French soldiers are taken as prisoners.

1528. Charles V. challenges Francis I. to single combat.

1528. Charles V. challenges Francis I. to a duel.

1529. 5th August, Francis I. concludes the unfavourable peace of Cambray. Termination of the French dominion in Italy. The Reformation in England is retarded.

1529. August 5th, Francis I. signs the unfavorable peace of Cambray. This marks the end of French control in Italy. The Reformation in England is delayed.

1527. Scruples of Henry VIII. respecting his marriage with Catherine of Arragon. Various negotiations on the subject in the following years. Cardinal Wolsey falls into disgrace. Thomas More becomes chancellor.

1527. Concerns of Henry VIII about his marriage to Catherine of Aragon. Various discussions on the topic in the following years. Cardinal Wolsey loses favor. Thomas More becomes chancellor.

1528. Henry VIII. retires to Tytynhangar in consequence of the Sweating Sickness.

1528. Henry VIII. retreats to Tytynhangar due to the Sweating Sickness.

1532. Separation of the king from Catherine. Mary is excluded from the government.

1532. The king separates from Catherine. Mary is left out of the government.

3351533. January, Anna Boleyn becomes queen. The Reformation is introduced.

3351533. January, Anna Boleyn becomes queen. The Reformation begins.

1535. Thomas More and Fisher are executed.

1535. Thomas More and Fisher are executed.

1536. Anna Boleyn is executed. Jane Seymour becomes queen. Dies 1537.

1536. Anne Boleyn is executed. Jane Seymour becomes queen. Dies 1537.

1537. Anne of Cleves becomes queen. Separation after six months.

1537. Anne of Cleves becomes queen. They separate after six months.

1541. Catherine Howard, queen, and executed one year and six months afterwards.

1541. Catherine Howard, queen, was executed one year and six months later.

1544. Catherine, queen.

1544. Queen Catherine.

1547. 13th December, Henry VIII. dies.

1547. December 13th, Henry VIII dies.

1521. Plots of the Iconoclasts in Zwickau and Wittenberg.

1521. Plots of the Iconoclasts in Zwickau and Wittenberg.

1523–1525. Peasant war. On the 15th May, battle ofFrankenhausen.

1523–1525. Peasant war. On May 15th, battle of Frankenhausen.

1529. Imperial Diet at Spires.

1529. Imperial Diet in Speyer.

1529. 22d September-16th October, the Turks before Vienna.

1529. September 22 - October 16, the Turks at Vienna.

1529. 2d October, assemblage of the Reformers in Marburg.

1529. 2nd October, gathering of the Reformers in Marburg.

1530. 25th June, surrender of the Augsburg confession. Severe decrees against the Protestants.

1530. June 25th, surrender of the Augsburg Confession. Harsh laws against the Protestants.

1531. League of the Protestant princes at Schmalkalden. Continued danger from the Turks.

1531. League of the Protestant princes at Schmalkalden. Ongoing threat from the Turks.

1532. Imperial Diet at Nuremberg. The Protestants obtain security.

1532. Imperial Diet at Nuremberg. The Protestants gain protection.

3361333–1535. Excesses of the Anabaptists at Münster.

3361333–1535. The Anabaptists' extremes at Münster.

1536. The Schmalkaldic league is strengthened.

1536. The Schmalkaldic League grows stronger.

1538. The Catholic States establish the sacred league at Nuremberg

1538. The Catholic States form the Holy League in Nuremberg.

1540. Paul III. (1534–1550) confirms the order of the Jesuits, founded in 1534 by Ignatius Loyola.

1540. Paul III. (1534–1550) confirms the Jesuit order, which was founded in 1534 by Ignatius Loyola.

1519–1541. Conquest of Mexico, Peru, Chili, &c.

1519–1541. Conquest of Mexico, Peru, Chile, etc.

Fourth Visitation.

1524. Great plague at Milan,

1524. Major outbreak in Milan,

1527. Inundations in Upper Italy.

1527. Floods in Northern Italy.

1527. 11th August, a comet.

August 11, 1527, a comet.

1527. Plague in the imperial army in Italy, after the sacking of Rome; and in Wittenberg.

1527. The plague hit the imperial army in Italy following the sacking of Rome, and it also spread to Wittenberg.

1528–1534. Years of famine, with a prevalence of moisture and heat.

1528–1534. A time of famine, marked by excessive moisture and heat.

1528. Repeated inundations. Continual south winds and summer fogs in Italy. Second great epidemic petechial fever there.

1528. Ongoing floods. Constant south winds and summer fogs in Italy. The second major outbreak of petechial fever there.

1528. Destruction of the French army before Naples by a pestilential Spotted Fever.

1528. The French army facing destruction near Naples due to a deadly outbreak of Spotted Fever.

1528. Cold spring and moist summer in France.

1528. Cold spring and humid summer in France.

1528–1532. Warm winters, moist summers. Repeated failures of harvest, and great famines in that country.

1528–1532. Mild winters, wet summers. Continuous crop failures and severe famines in that region.

1528. The Trousse-galant carries off a fourth part of the inhabitants of France in this and the following years.

1528. The Trousse-galant takes away a quarter of the population of France in this year and the years that follow.

1528. Wet and mild winter. Moist summer with fogs. Failure in crops, and famine in England.

1528. A wet and mild winter. A humid summer with fog. Crop failures and famine in England.

1528. At the end of May: outbreak in London of the Fourth epidemic Sweating Sickness. It spreads with great malignity, and with much disturbance of social life, all over England; carries off many distinguished persons, and terminates in the winter. This year it remains confined to England, and does not return in the following year.

1528. At the end of May: outbreak in London of the Fourth epidemic Sweating Sickness. It spreads quickly and disrupts social life across England; it claims the lives of many notable individuals and ends in the winter. This year it stays limited to England and doesn't come back the following year.

1528. Continual south-east winds. Great drought. Swarms of locusts and fiery meteors in the north of Germany.

1528. Ongoing southeast winds. Severe drought. Swarms of locusts and fiery meteors in northern Germany.

1529. Earthquake in Upper Italy. Sanguineous rain at Cremona. A comet in July and August.

1529. Earthquake in Northern Italy. Blood rain in Cremona. A comet appeared in July and August.

1529. Mild winter in Germany. The spring begins in February. Great moisture throughout the summer. General dearth in March. Disease among the porpoises in the Baltic. Unwholesomeness of the river fish in the north of Germany. Disease among birds. Languor resembling syncope in Pomerania. Frequent suicides in the March. In the middle of June a flood of rain lasting four days (torrent of St. Vitus) in the south of Germany. On the 10th of August, a universal tempest. 24th of August, and the following days great heat.

1529. Mild winter in Germany. Spring starts in February. A lot of moisture throughout the summer. General shortage in March. Disease among the porpoises in the Baltic Sea. Unhealthy river fish in northern Germany. Illness in birds. Weakness similar to fainting in Pomerania. Frequent suicides in March. In mid-June, a heavy rain lasted four days (torrent of St. Vitus) in southern Germany. On August 10th, a widespread storm. August 24th and the following days brought intense heat.

1529. 25th July, outbreak of the epidemic Sweating Sickness in Hamburgh. Termination on the 5th August. On the 29th July in Lübeck. On the 14th August in Zwickau. About the 1st September the English Sweating Sickness appears to spread universally all over Germany. On the 31st August in Stettin; termination on the 8th September. On the 1st September in Dantzic; termination on the 6th September. On the 24th August in Strasburg. On the 5th, 6th and 7th September in Cologne, Augsburg and Francfort on the Maine. About the 20th September in Vienna and among the besieging Turks. On the 27th September in Amsterdam. Termination on the 1st October in Antwerp and the rest of the Netherlands; simultaneously, at the end of September, in Denmark, Sweden and Noway. At the commencement of November a universal cessation of the epidemic Sweating Sickness.

1529. July 25th, outbreak of the Sweating Sickness epidemic in Hamburg. It ended on August 5th. On July 29th, it appeared in Lübeck. On August 14th, it was in Zwickau. Around September 1st, the English Sweating Sickness started spreading widely across Germany. On August 31st, it hit Stettin; ended on September 8th. On September 1st, it was in Danzig; ended on September 6th. On August 24th, it reached Strasbourg. On September 5th, 6th, and 7th, it was in Cologne, Augsburg, and Frankfurt on the Main. Around September 20th, it appeared in Vienna and among the besieging Turks. On September 27th, it reached Amsterdam. It ended on October 1st in Antwerp and the rest of the Netherlands; at the same time, at the end of September, it was in Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. By the beginning of November, the epidemic of Sweating Sickness had universally ceased.

1530. In October, overflow of the Tiber. Bursting of the dykes, and sudden inundations in Holland, which were repeated in 1532.

1530. In October, the Tiber overflowed. The dikes broke, causing sudden floods in Holland, which happened again in 1532.

1531. 1st of August to 3d September, the comet of Halley.

1531. August 1st to September 3rd, Halley's comet.

1532. From 2d October to 8th November, and

1532. From October 2nd to November 8th, and

1533. From the middle of June to August, comets.

1533. From mid-June to August, comets.

1534. Termination of the years of scarcity, during which malignant fevers prevailed in circumscribed localitiesthroughout Europe.

1534. End of the years of hardship, when serious fevers were widespread in specific areas across Europe.

337

337

Political Events.

1542. Maurice Duke of Saxony renounces the league of Schmalkalden.

1542. Maurice, Duke of Saxony, leaves the Schmalkaldic League.

1542. The imperial army which opposes the Turks in Hungary, under Joachim II. of Brandenburg, is destroyed by sickness.

1542. The imperial army fighting the Turks in Hungary, led by Joachim II of Brandenburg, is decimated by illness.

1546. The 18th of February, Luther dies.

1546. February 18th, Luther passes away.

1546. Charles V. takes the field against the Protestants, proclaimsthe Elector, John Frederick, and Landgrave Philip of Hesse, outlaws. Gains

1546. Charles V. goes to battle against the Protestants, declares the Elector, John Frederick, and Landgrave Philip of Hesse, outlaws. Gains

1547. 24th April, the battle of Muhlberg. Raises

1547. 24th April, the battle of Muhlberg. Raises

1548. Duke Maurice to the electorate of Saxony, and prescribes the interim, which is not accepted by Magdeburg.

1548. Duke Maurice to the electorate of Saxony, and prescribes the interim, which is not accepted by Magdeburg.

1551. Magdeburg declared to be under the imperial ban, and besieged in vain by the Saxons.

1551. Magdeburg was placed under the imperial ban and was unsuccessfully besieged by the Saxons.

1552. Henry II. of France (1547–1559), in alliance with the Protestant princes, takes Metz, Toul, and Verdun.

1552. Henry II of France (1547–1559), in alliance with the Protestant princes, captures Metz, Toul, and Verdun.

1552. The treaty of Passau secures to the Protestants equal rights with the Catholics.

1552. The Treaty of Passau gives Protestants the same rights as Catholics.

1547–1553. Edward VI. nine years old. The Duke of Somerset governs the kingdom as Protector. The Reformation338 is favoured, and makes progress.

1547–1553. Edward VI. nine years old. The Duke of Somerset rules the kingdom as Protector. The Reformation338 is supported and advances.

1553. Mary persecutes the Protestants, and in 1558 loses Calais.

1553. Mary persecutes the Protestants, and in 1558 loses Calais.

1556. Charles V. abdicates, and dies on the 11th of September, 1558, in Spain.

1556. Charles V. steps down from the throne and passes away on September 11, 1558, in Spain.

Fifth Visitation.

1538. Epidemic dysentery in France.

1538. Dysentery outbreak in France.

1540. The hot summer. The forests take fire spontaneously.

1540. The hot summer. The forests catch fire spontaneously.

1541. Plague in Constantinople.

1541. Plague in Istanbul.

1542. Swarms of locusts in the south of Europe, and plague in Hungary during the war of the Turks in that kingdom.

1542. Swarms of locusts in southern Europe, and a plague in Hungary during the war with the Turks in that region.

1543. Plague and petechial fever in Germany. Metz.

1543. Plague and petechial fever in Germany. Metz.

1545 and 1546. Trousse-galant in France, of which 10,000 English die at Boulogne.

1545 and 1546. Trousse-galant in France, where 10,000 English die at Boulogne.

1546. Plague in the Netherlands and France.

1546. Plague in the Netherlands and France.

1547. Petechial fever in the imperial army.

1547. Petechial fever in the imperial army.

1547–1551. Mould spots and red water in the north of Germany.

1547–1551. Mold spots and red water in northern Germany.

1549. Caterpillars destroy the herbage, and a mortality occurs among cattle in Germany. The 21st of September an aurora borealis.

1549. Caterpillars are destroying the vegetation, and there's a cattle die-off happening in Germany. On September 21st, there was an aurora borealis.

1549 and 1550. Malignant fever (petechial fever?) in the north of Germany.

1549 and 1550. Severe fever (petechial fever?) in northern Germany.

1551. Dry and cold spring; hot and wet summer. Inundations, earthquakes, meteors, mock suns, great tempests, summer fogs.

1551. Dry and cold spring; hot and wet summer. Flooding, earthquakes, meteors, false suns, huge storms, summer fogs.

1551. Malignant fever in Swabia: plague in Spain. Influenza.

1551. Severe fever in Swabia: plague in Spain. Flu.

1551. In the spring, stinking mists on the banks of the Severn.

1551. In the spring, foul mists around the banks of the Severn.

1551. On the 15th of April outbreak of the fifth epidemic Sweating Fever in Shrewsbury on the Severn. It gradually spreads with stinking mists all over England, and on the 9th of July reaches London. The mortality is very considerable. Foreigners are unaffected, but Englishmen in foreign countries sicken with the English Sweating Sickness. The epidemic terminates on the 30th of September.

1551. On April 15th, the fifth outbreak of the Sweating Fever started in Shrewsbury on the Severn. It slowly spreads with foul mists all over England, and by July 9th, it reaches London. The death toll is quite high. Foreigners are not affected, but Englishmen abroad fall ill with the English Sweating Sickness. The epidemic ends on September 30th.

1552 and 1553. Malignant fever in Germany and Switzerland.

1552 and 1553. Severe fever in Germany and Switzerland.


339

339

CATALOGUE OF WORKS[520]

REFERRED TO BY THE AUTHOR.

Adelung (Wolffgang Heinrich) Kurtze historische Beschreibung der uralten u. s. w. Stadt Hamburg. Hamburg, 1696, 4to.

Adelung (Wolfgang Heinrich) Short Historical Description of the ancient city of Hamburg. Hamburg, 1696, 4to.

Agricolæ; (Georgii) De peste Libri tres. Basileæ, 1554, 8vo.

Agricolæ; (Georgii) On the Plague, Three Books. Basel, 1554, 8vo.

Aikin (John) Biographical Memoirs of Medicine in Great Britain, from the revival of literature to the time of Harvey. London, 1780, 8vo.

Aikin (John) Biographical Memoirs of Medicine in Great Britain, from the revival of literature to the time of Harvey. London, 1780, 8vo.

Allionii (Caroli) Tractatio de miliarium origine, progressu, natura et curatione. Augustæ Taurinorum, 1758, 8vo.

Allionii (Caroli) Treatise on the Origin, Development, Nature, and Treatment of Mildew. Turin, 1758, 8vo.

Angelus (Andreas, Struthiomontanus) Annales Marchiæ Brandenburgicæ, das ist: Ordentliches Verzeichniss und Beschreibung der fürnemsten und gedenckwirdigsten Märckischen Jahrgeschichten u. s. w.  Franckfurt a. O. 1598, fol.

Angelus (Andreas, Struthiomontanus) Annales Marchiæ Brandenburgicæ, that is: An organized listing and description of the most notable and memorable historical events in Märkisch and so on. Frankfurt a. O. 1598, fol.

Annales Berolino Marchici, ab anno 965 ad annum 1740. Deutsche Handschrift. Berliner Königl. Bibl. MS. boruss. fol. 29.

Annales Berolino Marchici, from the year 965 to the year 1740. German manuscript. Berlin Royal Library. MS. boruss. fol. 29.

Antwerpsch Chronykje, sedert den jare 1500 tot het jaar 1574, door F. G. V. Te Leyden, 1743, 4to.

Antwerp Chronicle, from the year 1500 to the year 1574, by F. G. V. Te Leyden, 1743, 4to.

Aretæi Cappadocis Ætiologica, Simeiotica et Therapeutica morborum acutorum et diuturnorum, etc. Ed. Georg. Henisch. Augustæ Vindelicorum, 1603, fol.

Aretæi Cappadocis Ætiologica, Simeiotica et Therapeutica of acute and chronic illnesses, etc. Ed. Georg. Henisch. Augsburg, 1603, fol.

Astruc (Johann.) De morbis venereis Libri novem. 2 Tomi. Lutetiæ Parisiorum, 1740, 4to.

Astruc (Johann.) On Venereal Diseases Nine Books. 2 Volumes. Paris, 1740, 4to.

Autenrieth (Hermann Friedrich) Ueber das Gift der Fische, mit vergleichender Berücksichtigung des Giftes von Muscheln, Käse, Gehirn, Fleisch, Fett und Würsten, so wie der sogenannten mechanischen Gifte. Tübingen, 1833, 8vo.

Autenrieth (Hermann Friedrich) On the Poison of Fish, with a Comparative Consideration of the Poison from Shellfish, Cheese, Brain, Meat, Fat, and Sausages, as well as the so-called Mechanical Poisons. Tübingen, 1833, 8vo.

Baccii (Andreæ) De Thermis Libri VII. Patavii, 1711, 4to.

Baccii (Andreæ) On the Baths, 7 Books. Padua, 1711, 4to.

Bacon, see Verulam.

Bacon, see Verulam.

Baker (Sir Richard) A Chronicle of the Kings of England, 340 from the time of the Romans Government unto the death of King James. London, 1665, fol.

Baker (Sir Richard) A Chronicle of the Kings of England, 340 from the time of Roman rule to the death of King James. London, 1665, fol.

Balæi (Joannis, Sudovolcæ) Illustrium maioris Britanniæ scriptorum, hoc est Angliæ, Cambriæ et Scotiæ Summarium, ad annum d. 1548. Londini, 1548, 4to.

Balæi (Joannis, Sudovolcæ) Summary of the prominent writers of Great Britain, that is, England, Wales, and Scotland, to the year 1548. London, 1548, 4to.

Bayer (Wencesslaus—von Elbogen, genannt Cubito) Richtiger rathschlag und bericht der ytzt regierenden Pestilentz, so man den Engelischen Schweyss nennet. Leyptzigk, d. 4. September, 1829, 8vo. (Im Besitz des Verf.)

Bayer (Wencesslaus—von Elbogen, known as Cubito) Proper advice and report of the currently ruling plague, which is called the English sweat. Leipzig, September 4, 1829, 8vo. (In the possession of the author.)

Bell (George Hamilton) A Treatise on the diseases of the liver, and on bilious complaints, etc. Edinburgh and London, 1833, 8vo.

Bell (George Hamilton) A Treatise on the Diseases of the Liver, and on Bilious Complaints, etc. Edinburgh and London, 1833, 8vo.

Bonn (M. Hermann) Lübecksche Chronica. s. 1. 1634, 8vo.

Bonn (M. Hermann) Lübeck Chronicle. see 1. 1634, 8vo.

Brown (Robert) Vermischte botanische Schriften. Ins Deutsche übersetzt und mit Anmerkungen versehen von C. G. Nees von Esenbeck. Schmalkalden, 1825, 2 Bde. 8vo.

Brown (Robert) Miscellaneous Botanical Writings. Translated into German and annotated by C. G. Nees von Esenbeck. Schmalkalden, 1825, 2 Volumes. 8vo.

Burserii de Kanilfeld (Joann. Baptist.) Institutionum medicinæ practicæ, quas auditoribus suis prælegebat, Voll. IV. Recudi cur. J. F. C. Hecker. Lipsiæ, 1826, 8vo.

Burserii de Kanilfeld (Joann. Baptist.) Institutionum medicinæ practicæ, quas auditoribus suis prælegebat, Voll. IV. Recudi cur. J. F. C. Hecker. Leipzig, 1826, 8vo.

Cælii Aureliani Siccensis, De morbis acutis et chronicis Libri VIII. Ed. Jo. Conrad. Amman. Amstelædami, 1755, 4to.

Cælii Aureliani Siccensis, On Acute and Chronic Diseases Books VIII. Ed. Jo. Conrad. Amman. Amsterdam, 1755, 4to.

Caii (Johannis, Britanni) De Ephemera Britannica Liber. Recudi cur. J. F. C. Hecker. Berolini, 1833, 12mo.

Caii (Johannis, Britanni) De Ephemera Britannica Liber. Published by J. F. C. Hecker. Berlin, 1833, 12mo.

Joannis Caii Britanni, De canibus Britannicis Liber unus; De rariorum animalium et stirpium historia Liber unus; De libris propriis Liber unus; De pronunciatione Græcæ et Latinæ linguæ, cum scriptione nova, Libellus. Ad optimorum exemplarium fidem recogniti a S. Jebb, M.D. Londini, 1729, 8vo.

Joannis Caii Britanni, One Book on British Dogs; One Book on the History of Rare Animals and Plants; One Book on His Own Writings; A Pamphlet on the Pronunciation of Greek and Latin, with New Writing. Revised by S. Jebb, M.D. London, 1729, 8vo.

Caius (John) A Boke or Counseill against the Disease commonly called the Sweate or Sweatyng Sicknesse. Imprinted at London, A. D. 1552, 12mo. (Ist in Deutschland nicht vorhanden. Einen Abdruck des grössten Theiles dieser merkwürdigen Schrift hat Babington in seiner Englischen Uebersetzung vom “schwarzen Tode” des Verf. geliefert.) See Appendix.

Caius (John) A Book or Counsel Against the Disease Commonly Known as the Sweat or Sweating Sickness. Printed in London, A.D. 1552, 12mo. (Not available in Germany. A print of most of this remarkable work has been provided by Babington in his English translation of the author's "Black Death.") See Appendix.

Campo (Antonio) Cremona, fedelissima citta et nobilissima colonia de Romani, rappresentata in disegno col suo contato et illustrata d’una breve historia, etc. Milano, 1645, 4to.

Campo (Antonio) Cremona, a loyal city and a noble colony of the Romans, illustrated in a layout with its surrounding area and accompanied by a brief history, etc. Milan, 1645, 4to.

Auli Cornelii Celsi, Medicinæ Libri octo. Ex recensione Leonardi Targæ. Patavii, 1769, 4to.341

Auli Cornelii Celsi, Eight Books of Medicine. Edited by Leonardo Targa. Padua, 1769, 4to.341

Du Chesne (André) Histoire générale d’Angleterre d’Ecosse et d’Irlande. Paris, 1614, fol.

Du Chesne (André) General History of England, Scotland, and Ireland. Paris, 1614, fol.

Kurzgefasste Hamburgische Chronica, u. s. w. Hamburg, 1725, 8vo.

Kurzgefasste Hamburgische Chronica, etc. Hamburg, 1725, 8vo.

Chronici chronicorum politici Libri duo. Francoforti, 1614, 8vo.

Chronicles of Political Chronicles, Two Books. Frankfurt, 1614, 8vo.

Chronik von Erfurt, bis 1574. Handschrift, 4to. Ohne Seitenzahlen. Durch die Güte des Herrn Regierungs- und Medicinalraths Dr. Fischer in Erfurt im Besitz des Verfassers.

Chronicle of Erfurt, up to 1574. Manuscript, 4to. No page numbers. Thanks to the kindness of Mr. Government and Medical Councilor Dr. Fischer in Erfurt, in the possession of the author.

Mémoires de Messire Philippe de Comines, où l’on trouve l’histoire des Rois de France Louis XI. et Charles VIII. 4 Volumes. Paris, 1747, 4to.

Mémoires de Messire Philippe de Comines, où l’on trouve l’histoire des Rois de France Louis XI. et Charles VIII. 4 Volumes. Paris, 1747, 4to.

Cordus (Euricius) Eyn Regiment, wie man sich vor der newen Plage, der Englisch schweiss genannt, bewaren, und so man damit ergriffen wird, darinn halten soll. Marburg, 1529, 4to. Die zweite Auflage ist bald nach der ersten erschienen, und dieser in dem Exemplar der Königl. Bibl. zu Berlin angebunden.

Cordus (Euricius) Eyn Regiment, how one can protect themselves from the new plague known as the English sweat, and what to do if one is affected by it. Marburg, 1529, 4to. The second edition was published soon after the first and is bound in the copy at the Royal Library in Berlin.

Cramer (D. Daniel) Das grosse Pomrische Kirchen-Chronicon, u. s. w. Alt-Stettin, 1676, fol.

Cramer (D. Daniel) The Great Pommeranian Church Chronicle, etc. Old Stettin, 1676, fol.

Curicke (Reinhold) Der Stadt Dantzigk historische Beschreibung. Amsterdam und Dantzigk, 1688, fol.

Curicke (Reinhold) A Historical Description of the City of Danzig. Amsterdam and Danzig, 1688, fol.

Dalin (Olof) Svea Rikes Historia. 3 Delen. Stockholm, 1747–60, 4to.

Dalin (Olof) History of the Swedish Kingdom. Volume 3. Stockholm, 1747–60, 4to.

Damiani (Tertii—Vissenaci Decicopolitani) Theoricæ medicinæ, totam rem miro compendio complectentes, non modo medicis aut chirurgis, verum et omnibus, quibus sanitatis divitiæ cordi sunt, accommodæ, atque adeo necessariæ. His accessit Libellus περὶ τοῦ ἱδρωνούσου, tempore, quo hoc malum sæviret ab eodem concinnatus. Antwerpiæ, 1541, 4to. (Bibliothek der Universität Jena.)

Damiani (Tertii—Vissenaci Decicopolitani) Theoricæ medicinæ provides a remarkable summary of the entire subject, not only for doctors or surgeons but for anyone concerned with health and well-being. Additionally, it includes the booklet about the sweating, created during the time when this affliction was rampant. Antwerp, 1541, 4to. (University Library Jena.)

Ditmari (Episcopi Mersepurgii) Chronici Libri VII. nunc primum in lucem editi. Francofurti, 1580, fol.

Ditmari (Bishop of Merseburg) Chronicles Book VII. now published for the first time. Frankfurt, 1580, fol.

Erasmi (Desiderii, Roterodami) Epistolarum Libri XXXI. et Melanchthonis Libri IV. etc. Londini, 1642, fol.

Erasmus (Desiderius of Rotterdam) Letters in 31 Books and Melanchthon's 4 Books, London, 1642, fol.

Erasmi (Desiderii) Roterodamensis Μωρίας ἐγκώμιον sive Stultitiæ laus. Ed. Guil. Gottl. Becker. Basil. 1780, 8vo.

Erasmus (Desiderius) of Rotterdam Praise of Folly or The Praise of Stupidity. Ed. Guil. Gottl. Becker. Basel. 1780, 8vo.

Fabyan (Robert) The new Chronicles of England and France, named by himself the Concordance of Histories. London, 1811, 4to.

Fabyan (Robert) The New Chronicles of England and France, which he called the Concordance of Histories. London, 1811, 4to.

Fallopii (Gabrielis) Opera quæ adhuc extant omnia. Francofurti, 1584, fol.342

Fallopii (Gabrielis) All of the Works That Still Exist. Frankfurt, 1584, fol.342

Fell (Joannes) Rerum Anglicarum Scriptores veteres, Oxon. 1684, fol.

Fell (Joannes) Ancient English Writings, Oxford, 1684, fol.

Fernelii (Joannis, Ambiani) Universa medicina, tribus et viginti Libris absoluta. Lutetiæ Parisiorum, 1567, fol.

Fernelii (Joannis, Ambiani) Complete Medicine, in twenty-three books. Paris, 1567, fol.

Foderé (Fr. Emm.) Leçons sur les épidémies et l’hygiène publique, faites à la faculté de médecine de Strasbourg. 4 Voll. Paris, 1822–24, 8vo.

Foderé (Fr. Emm.) Lessons on Epidemics and Public Health, given at the Faculty of Medicine of Strasbourg. 4 Volumes. Paris, 1822–24, 8vo.

Foresti (Petri, Alcmariani) Observationum et curationum medicinalium, sive Medicinæ theoricæ et practicæ Libri XXVIII. Francofurti, a. M. 1614, fol.

Foresti (Petri, Alcmariani) Observations and Medical Treatments, or Books XXVIII of Theoretical and Practical Medicine. Frankfurt, 1614, fol.

Fracastorii (Hieronymi) Veronensis, Opera II. partt. Lugdun. 1591, 8vo.

Fracastorii (Hieronymi) Veronensis, Opera II. partt. Lyon, 1591, 8vo.

Franck von Wörd, Chronica, Zeytbuch und Geschychtbibel von anbegyn biss inn diss gegenwertig 1531. jar. Strassburg, 1531, fol.

Franck von Wörd, Chronicles, Timebook, and History Bible from the beginning until this present year of 1531. Strasbourg, 1531, fol.

Konning Friderich den Forstis, Danmarckis, Norgis, Wendis oc Gothis Konning, etc. Histori. Kiobenhaffn, 1597, 4to.

Konning Friderich den Forstis, Danmarckis, Norgis, Wendis oc Gothis Konning, etc. Histori. København, 1597, 4to.

Fuhrmann (Matthias) Alt -und neues Wien, oder dieser Kayserl. und Ertz-Lands-fürstlichen Residentz-Stadt chronologisch- und historische Beschreibung. 2 Theile. Wien, 1739, 8vo.

Fuhrmann (Matthias) Old and New Vienna, or this Imperial and Archducal Residence City: A Chronological and Historical Description. 2 Parts. Vienna, 1739, 8vo.

Gemma (Cornelius) De Naturæ divinis characterismis, seu raris et admirandis spectaculis, causis, indiciis, proprietatibus rerum in partibus singulis universi. Libri II. Antverpiæ, 1575, 8vo.

Gemma (Cornelius) On the divine characteristics of nature, or the rare and wonderful spectacles, causes, signs, and properties of things in each part of the universe. Two volumes. Antwerp, 1575, 8vo.

(Godwin) Rerum Anglicarum Henrico VIII. Eduardo VI. et Maria regnantibus Annales, nunc primum editi. Ex officina Nortoniana, 1616, fol.

(Godwin) Rerum Anglicarum Henrico VIII. Eduardo VI. et Maria regnantibus Annales, now published for the first time. From the Norton press, 1616, fol.

Godwyn (Francis, Bishop of Hereford) Annals of England, containing the reigns of Henry VIII., Edward VI., Queen Maria. Englished, corrected and enlarged by Morgan Godwyn. London, 1675, fol.

Godwyn (Francis, Bishop of Hereford) Annals of England, covering the reigns of Henry VIII, Edward VI, and Queen Mary. Translated, revised, and expanded by Morgan Godwyn. London, 1675, fol.

Grafton’s Chronicle, or History of England, from the year 1189 to 1558. In two volumes. London, 1809, 4to.

Grafton’s Chronicle, or History of England, from the year 1189 to 1558. In two volumes. London, 1809, 4to.

Le Grand d’Aussy, Histoire de la vie privée des Français, depuis l’origine de la nation jusqu’à nos jours. 3 Voll. Paris, 1782, 8vo.

Le Grand d’Aussy, History of the Private Life of the French, from the Origins of the Nation to Today. 3 Vols. Paris, 1782, 8vo.

Gratiolo (Andrea—di Salò) Discorso di peste, nel quale si contengono utilissime speculazioni intorno alla natura, cagioni, curazione della peste, con un catologo di tutte le pesti piu notabili dei tempi passati. Venezia, 1546, 4to.

Gratiolo (Andrea—di Salò) Discourse on the Plague, which contains very useful discussions about the nature, causes, and treatment of the plague, along with a catalog of all the most notable plagues from past times. Venice, 1546, 4to.

Gratoroli (Guilielmi) Collectio. Der vollständige Titel dieser sonderbar zusammengewürfelten Sammlung ist: Clarissimi343 philosophi et medici Petri de Abano de Venenis corumque remediis. Item Consilium de præservatione a venenis D. Guilielmi Gratoroli. Item generosi Hermanni a Nuenare Comitis περὶ τοῦ ἱδροπυρετοῦ, id est sudatoria febri. Item Curatio sudoris Anglici in Germania experta. Item Joachimi Schilleri de Peste Britanica Commentariolus aureus. Omnia opera D. Guilielmi Gratoroli ex manu scriptis exemplaribus collata, aucta atque illustrata, 8vo. Sine loco et anno.

Gratoroli (Guilielmi) Collection. The full title of this oddly assembled collection is: The Most Distinguished Philosopher and Physician Peter of Abano on Poisons and their Remedies. Also, Advice on Prevention from Poisons by D. Guilielmi Gratoroli. Also, Noble Hermann von Nuenare's work about the sweat fever, which means on the sweating fever. Also, Treatment of English Sweat Experienced in Germany. Also, Joachim Schiller's Brief Golden Commentary on the British Plague. All of D. Guilielmi Gratoroli's works compiled, enhanced, and illustrated from manuscript copies, 8vo. No place or date.

Gruner (Christianus Gottfridus) Itinerarium Sudoris Anglici ex actis designatum. Jenæ, 1805, 8vo.

Gruner (Christianus Gottfridus) Itinerarium Sudoris Anglici ex actis designatum. Jenæ, 1805, 8vo.

Gruner (Christianus Gottfridus) Scriptorum de Sudore Anglico superstitum editio hactenus desiderata et adornata. Jenæ, (1805,) 8vo.

Gruner (Christianus Gottfridus) Writings on English Sweat A long-awaited and well-edited edition. Jena, (1805,) 8vo.

Practica celeberrimi viri Antonii Guainerii Papiensis medicinæ Doctoris, etc. Lugduni, 1517, 4to.

Practica of the very renowned man, Antonius Guainerius of Pavia, Doctor of Medicine, etc. Lyon, 1517, 4to.

Guicciardini (Francesco) Della Istoria d’Italia Libri XX. Venez. 1738, fol.

Guicciardini (Francesco) History of Italy in 20 Books. Venice, 1738, fol.

Haftitz (Peter) Microchronologicum Marchicum, das ist ein kurtz Zeitbüchlein u. s. w. Handschrift. Berliner Königl. Bibl. Ms. boruss. Fol. 23.

Haftitz (Peter) Microchronologicum Marchicum, which is a short little book, etc. Manuscript. Berlin Royal Library Ms. boruss. Fol. 23.

Hall’s Chronicle, containing the History of England, during the reign of Henry IV. and the succeeding monarchs, to the end of the reign of Henry VIII. London, 1809, 4to.

Hall’s Chronicle, which includes the History of England, covering the reign of Henry IV and the following monarchs, up to the end of Henry VIII's reign. London, 1809, 4to.

Haræi (Francisci) Annales ducum seu principum Brabantiæ totiusque Belgii. Tomi III. Antverpiæ, 1623, fol.

Haræi (Francisci) Annals of the Dukes or Princes of Brabant and all of Belgium. Volume III. Antwerp, 1623, fol.

Hartmann (Petrus Immanuel) De sudore unius lateris. Diss. Halæ, 1751, 4to.

Hartmann (Petrus Immanuel) On the Sweat from One Side. Dissertation, Halle, 1751, 4to.

Hecker (Justus Friedrich Karl) Geschichte der Heilkunde, nach den Quellen bearbeitet. 2 Bände. Berlin, 1822–29, 8vo.

Hecker (Justus Friedrich Karl) History of Medicine, edited from the sources. 2 volumes. Berlin, 1822–29, 8vo.

Hecker (Just. Fred. Ch.) The Black Death in the fourteenth century. Translated by B. G. Babington. London, 1833, 8vo.

Hecker (Just. Fred. Ch.) The Black Death in the 14th century. Translated by B. G. Babington. London, 1833, 8vo.

Hellwetter (Johann) Vor die Engelische kranckheyt, die Schweifssucht genandt, ein Regiment. Leiptzick. (Im Besitz des Verf.)

Hellwetter (Johann) On the English illness, known as the tail obsession, a regimen. Leipzig. (In the possession of the author.)

Herbert of Cherbury (Lord Edward) The life and raigne of King Henry the eighth. London, 1649, fol.

Herbert of Cherbury (Lord Edward) The Life and Reign of King Henry VIII. London, 1649, fol.

Hermanni Contracti Chronicon, ex inedito hucusque codice Augiensi, etc. Ed. Æmilian. Ussermann. 1790, 4to. s. 1.344

Hermanni Contracti Chronicon, from an unpublished manuscript in the Augiensi, etc. Ed. Æmilian. Ussermann. 1790, 4to. s. 1.344

Magni Hippocratis Coaca præsagia, etc. Cum interpretatione et commentariis Jacobi Hollerii Stempani, nunc primum Desiderii Jacotii Vandoperani opera in lucem editis. Lugduni, 1576, fol.

Magni Hippocratis Coaca predictions, etc. With interpretation and commentaries by Jacob Hollerii Stempani, now first published through the works of Desiderius Jacotii Vandoperani. Lyon, 1576, fol.

Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland. In six volumes. London, 1808, 4to.

Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland. In six volumes. London, 1808, 4to.

Hollerii (Jacobi, Stempani) medici Parisiensis cel. De Morbis internis Libri II. Lugduni, 1578, 8vo.

Hollerii (Jacobi, Stempani) doctor from Paris, renowned. On Internal Diseases Volume II. Lyon, 1578, 8vo.

Hosack (David) Essays on various subjects of medical science. 3 Voll. New York, 1824–30, 8vo.

Hosack (David) Essays on various subjects of medical science. 3 Volumes. New York, 1824–30, 8vo.

Huitfeld (Arrild) Danmarckis Rigis Kronicke, fra Kong Dan den forste oc indtil Kong Knud den 6. Kiobenhaffn, T. I. 1650, T. II. 1652, fol.

Huitfeld (Arrild) Danmarckis Rigis Kronicke, from King Dan the first and up to King Knud the 6th. Copenhagen, T. I. 1650, T. II. 1652, fol.

V. Humboldt (Friedrich Alexander) Versuche über die gereizte Muskel- und Nervenfaser, nebst Vermuthungen über den chemischen Process des Lebens in der Thier- und Pflanzenwelt, 2 Bde. Berlin, 1797, 8vo.

V. Humboldt (Friedrich Alexander) Experiments on Excited Muscle and Nerve Fibers, along with Speculations on the Chemical Processes of Life in the Animal and Plant Worlds, 2 Volumes. Berlin, 1797, 8vo.

Hume (David) The History of England, from the invasion of Julius Cæsar to the revolution in 1688. In 8 Voll. London, 1782, 8vo.

Hume (David) The History of England, from the invasion of Julius Cæsar to the revolution in 1688. In 8 Volumes. London, 1782, 8vo.

Hundt (Magnus, von Magdeburgk) Eyn kurtzes und sehr nutzbarlichs Regiment wider dye schwynde und erschreckliche kranckheit der Pestilentz auss bewerten und geübten Ertzten tzusamen getragen, sampt einem kurtzen bericht der schweysskranckheit. Meher eyn nutzlichs Regiment wider die weltleuftige und unsauber kranckheit der Frantzosen, u. s. w. Leyptzigk, am 7. October, 1529, 8vo. (Im Besitz des Verf.)

Hundt (Magnus, of Magdeburg) A brief and very useful guide against the swift and terrifying disease of the plague, compiled from the writings of experienced physicians, along with a short report on the sweating sickness. More useful guidance against the widespread and filthy disease of the French, etc. Leipzig, on October 7, 1529, 8vo. (In the possession of the author.)

Jordani (Thomæ) Pestis phænomena, seu de iis, quæ circa febrem pestilentem apparent, exercitatio. Francofurti, 1576, 8vo.

Jordani (Thomæ) Pestis phenomena, or on those things that appear concerning the pestilent fever, a treatise. Frankfurt, 1576, 8vo.

Jovii (Pauli, Novocomensis, Episcopi Nucerini) Historiarum sui temporis Tomi II. Basil. 1567. 3 Voll. 8vo.

Jovii (Pauli, Novocomensis, Episcopi Nucerini) Historiarum of his time Volume II. Basel, 1567. 3 volumes. 8vo.

Kegler (Casparus) Eyn nutzlichs und trostlichs Regiment wider dy Pestilentz und gifftigk pestilentzisch Feber die Schweyssucht genant, und sust mancherley gifftig und tödtlich kranckheit, u. s. w. Leyptzigk, 1529, 8vo. (Im Besitz des Verf. Ist die zweite Auflage. Eine andere ist von Kegler’s Sohn, Melchior, vermehrt in Breslau, 1568, erschienen, und im Besitz des Hrn. Reg. R. Lorinser in Oppeln.)345

Kegler (Casparus) A useful and comforting guide against the plague and the deadly, toxic fever known as the sweating sickness, along with various other toxic and fatal diseases, etc. Leipzig, 1529, 8vo. (The author holds the second edition. Another edition, expanded by Kegler's son, Melchior, was published in Breslau in 1568 and is held by Mr. Reg. R. Lorinser in Opole.)345

Kircheri (Athanasii) Scrutinium physico-medicum contagiosæ luis quæ dicitur Pestis. Ed. Chr. Lange. Lipsiæ, 1671, 4to.

Kircheri (Athanasii) Physical-Medical Inquiry into the Contagious Disease Known as the Plague. Edited by Chr. Lange. Leipzig, 1671, 4to.

Kirchring (Gottschalck) und Müller (Gottschalck) Compendium Chronicæ Lubecensis, oder Auszug und historischer Kern Lübischer Chronicken; aus verschiedenen Authoribus, als Alb. Crantio, Herm. Bonno, Chytreo, Reimaro Kock, Reckmann, Helmoldo, Rehbeen, Angelo, Petersen u. s. w. zusammengetragen. Hamburg, 1678, 8vo.

Kirchring (Gottschalck) and Müller (Gottschalck) Compendium of the Lübeck Chronicle, or Summary and Historical Core of Lübeck Chronicles; compiled from various authors, such as Alb. Crantio, Herm. Bonno, Chytreo, Reimaro Kock, Reckmann, Helmoldo, Rehbeen, Angelo, Petersen, and others. Hamburg, 1678, 8vo.

Klemzen (Nicolaus) Vom Pommer-Lande und dessen Fürsten Geschlecht-Beschreibung, in vier Büchern, nach einer alten Handschrift herausgegeben. Stralsund, 1771, 4to.

Klemzen (Nicolaus) From Pomerania and its Princes Family Description, in four volumes, published from an old manuscript. Stralsund, 1771, 4to.

Kronica der Preussen, 1553, fol. Handschrift der K. Bibl. zu Berlin. Ms. boruss. Fol. 176.

Kronica der Preussen, 1553, fol. Manuscript of the K. Bibl. in Berlin. Ms. boruss. Fol. 176.

Lemnii (Levini, medici Zirizæi) De habitu et constitutione corporis, quam Græci κρᾶσιν, triviales complexionem vocant, Libri II. Jenæ, 1587, 8vo.

Lemnii (Levini, doctor of Zirizæi) On the Habit and Constitution of the Body, which the Greeks call κρᾶσιν, Two Books. Jena, 1587, 8vo.

Lilie (George) Chronicon, sive brevis enumeratio regum et principum, in quos variante fortuna Britanniæ imperium diversis temporibus translatum. Francofurti, 1565, 4to. Abgedruckt bei Jo. Gualterus, Chronicon chronicorum politicum. Francofurti, 1614, 8vo, welche Ausgabe hier benutzt ist.

Lilie (George) Chronicon, or a brief list of kings and princes, to whom the varying fortune of Britain’s rule has been transferred at different times. Frankfurt, 1565, 4to. Printed by Jo. Gualterus, Chronicon chronicorum politicum. Frankfurt, 1614, 8vo, which edition is used here.

Marsolier (de) Histoire de Henry VII., Roy d’Angleterre, surnommé le Sage, et le Salomon d’Angleterre. Paris, 1700, 8vo.

Marsolier (de) Histoire de Henry VII., Roy d’Angleterre, surnommé le Sage, et le Salomon d’Angleterre. Paris, 1700, 8vo.

Massæ (Nicolai, Veneti) Liber de Febre pestilentiali, ac de pestichiis, morbillis, variolis et apostematibus pestilentialibus, ac eorundem omnium curatione, etc. Venetiis, 1556, 4to.

Massæ (Nicolai, Veneti) Book on Pestilential Fever, including Pestilences, Measles, Smallpox, and Pestilent Abscesses, and Treatments for All of Them, etc. Venice, 1556, 4to.

Menckenii (Joannis Burchardi) Scriptores rerum Germanicarum, præsertim Saxonicarum. 3 Voll. Lipsiæ, 1728–30. fol.

Menckenii (Joannis Burchardi) Writers of German Affairs, especially Saxon Matters. 3 Volumes. Leipzig, 1728–30. fol.

Mezeray (Comte de) Histoire de France. 3 Voll. Paris, 1685, fol.

Mezeray (Count of) History of France. 3 Volumes. Paris, 1685, fol.

Moore (James) The History of the Small Pox. London, 1815, 8 vo.

Moore (James) The History of Small Pox. London, 1815, 8vo.

Mori (Thomæ) Opera omnia. Francofurti a. M. et Lipsiæ, 1689, fol.

Mori (Thomæ) Complete Works. Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1689, fol.

Omodei (Annibale) Del governo politico medico del morbo petechiale, etc. Milano, 1822, 8vo.

Omodei (Annibale) On the Political Medical Management of Petechial Disease, etc. Milan, 1822, 8vo.

Osorii (Hieronymi, Lusitani Silvensis, in Algarbiis Episcopi) 346De Rebus Emmanuelis, regis Lusitaniæ gestis Libri XII. Coloniæ Agrippinæ, 1576, 8vo.

Osorii (Hieronymi, Lusitani Silvensis, in Algarbiis Episcopi) 346De Rebus Emmanuelis, king of Lusitania's deeds, 12 Books. Cologne, 1576, 8vo.

Ozanam (J. A. F.) Histoire médicale générale et particulière des maladies épidémiques, contagieuses et epizootiques, etc. 5 Voll. Paris, 1817–23, 8vo.

Ozanam (J. A. F.) General and Specific Medical History of Epidemic, Contagious, and Epizootic Diseases, etc. 5 Volumes. Paris, 1817–23, 8vo.

Paré (Ambroise) Œuvres. 7ème édition. Paris, 1614, fol.

Paré (Ambroise) Works. 7th edition. Paris, 1614, fol.

Pasquier (Estienne) Les Recherches de la France. Paris, 1565, fol.

Pasquier (Estienne) The Investigations of France. Paris, 1565, fol.

Le Petit (Jean François) La grande Chronique ancienne et moderne de Hollande, Zelande, West-Frise, Utrecht, Frise, Overyssel et Groeningue, jusqu’à la fin de l’an 1600. Dordrecht, 1601. 2 Voll. fol.

Le Petit (Jean François) The Great Ancient and Modern Chronicle of Holland, Zeeland, West Friesland, Utrecht, Friesland, Overijssel, and Groningen, up to the end of the year 1600. Dordrecht, 1601. 2 Vols. fol.

Petri Martyris Anglerii Mediolanensis, De orbe novo Decades octo. Labore et industria Rich. Hakluyti, Oxoniens. Paris, 1587, 8vo.

Petri Martyris Anglerii Mediolanensis, De orbe novo Decades octo. Edited and compiled by Richard Hakluyt, Oxford, 1587, 8vo.

Pez (Hieronymus) Scriptores rerum Austriacarum veteres et genuini. 2 Voll. Lipsiæ, 1721–25, fol.

Pez (Hieronymus) Writers of Austrian History, ancient and authentic. 2 Volumes. Leipzig, 1721–25, fol.

Pfeufer (Karl) Beiträge zur Geschichte des Petechial-typhus. (Diss.) Bamberg, 1831, 8vo.

Pfeufer (Karl) Contributions to the History of Petechial Typhus. (Thesis) Bamberg, 1831, 8vo.

Pilgram (Antonii) Calendarium chronologicum medii potissimum ævi monumentis accommodatum. Viennæ, 1781, 4to.

Pilgram (Antonii) Chronological Calendar Adapted to the Monuments of the Middle Ages. Vienna, 1781, 4to.

Pingré, Cométographie ou Traité historique et théorique des Comètes. 2 Voll. Paris, 1783, 84, 4to.

Pingré, Cométographie or Historical and Theoretical Treatise on Comets. 2 Vols. Paris, 1783, 84, 4to.

Pomarius (M. Johannes) Chronika der Sachsen und Nidersachsen. Wittenberg, 1589, fol.

Pomarius (M. Johannes) Chronicle of Saxony and Lower Saxony. Wittenberg, 1589, fol.

Pontani (Johannis Isaci) Historiæ Gelricæ Libri XIV. Hardervici Gelrorum, 1639, fol.

Pontani (Johannis Isaci) Historiæ Gelricæ Books XIV. Hardervici Gelrorum, 1639, fol.

De Rapin (Thoyras) Histoire d’Angleterre. 4 Tom. Basle, 1746, fol.

De Rapin (Thoyras) History of England. 4 Vols. Basel, 1746, fol.

Rayer (P.) Traité théorique et pratique des maladies de la peau, fondé sur de nouvelles recherches d’anatomie et de physiologie pathologiques. 2 Voll. Paris, 1826, 27, 8vo.

Rayer (P.) Theoretical and Practical Treatise on Skin Diseases, based on new research in anatomy and pathological physiology. 2 Vols. Paris, 1826, 27, 8vo.

Rayer (P.) Histoire de l’épidémie de suette-miliaire, qui a regné en 1821 dans les Départemens de l’Oise et de Seine-et-Oise. Paris, 1822, 8vo.

Rayer (P.) History of the sweating sickness epidemic that occurred in 1821 in the departments of Oise and Seine-et-Oise. Paris, 1822, 8vo.

Ein Regiment der ihenen, so durch Gottes vorhengung inn die newe Schwitzende seuche plotzlich fallen. Wittemberg, 1529, 8vo. (Im Besitz des Verf.)

Ein Regiment der ihenen, so durch Gottes vorhengung inn die newe Schwitzende seuche plotzlich fallen. Wittemberg, 1529, 8vo. (Im Besitz des Verf.)

Regkman (Hans) Lübeckishe Chronik. s. 1. 1619, fol.347

Regkman (Hans) Lübeckishe Chronik. s. 1. 1619, fol.347

Reusner (Hieronym., Nordlingens. Poliatr.) Diexodicarum exercitationum Liber de Scorbuto. Francofurti, 1600, 8vo.

Reusner (Hieronym., Nordlingens. Poliatr.) Exercise on the Causes of Scurvy Book on Scurvy. Frankfurt, 1600, 8vo.

Richter (Georg August) Medicinische Geschichte der Belagerung und Einnahme der Festung Torgau, und Beschreibung der Epidemie, welche 1813 und 14 daselbst herrschte. Berlin, 1814, 8vo.

Richter (Georg August) Medical History of the Siege and Capture of the Fortress Torgau, and Description of the Epidemic that Affected the Area in 1813 and 1814. Berlin, 1814, 8vo.

Rondeletii (Guilelmi) Methodus curandorum omnium morborum corporis humani, in tres Libros distincta. Eiusdem de dignoscendis morbis. De Febribus. De Morbo gallico. De Internis et Externis. De Pharmacopolarum officina. De Fucis. Francofurti a. M. 1592, 8vo.

Rondeletii (Guilelmi) Method for Treating All Diseases of the Human Body, divided into three books. Also on Diagnosing Diseases. On Fevers. On the French Disease. On Internal and External Conditions. On the Pharmacists' Workshop. On Dyes. Frankfurt, 1592, 8vo.

Sandoval (Don Fray Prudencio de) Historia de la vida y hechos del Emperador Carlos V. 2 Part. En Pamplona, 1618, 1614, fol.

Sandoval (Don Fray Prudencio de) History of the Life and Deeds of Emperor Charles V. 2 Parts. In Pamplona, 1618, 1614, fol.

Sauvages (Francisc. Boissier de) Nosologia methodica sistens morborum classes juxta Sydenhami mentem et botanicorum ordinem. Amstelodami, 1768. 2 Voll. 4to.

Sauvages (Francisc. Boissier de) Methodical Nosology listing the classes of diseases according to Sydenham's ideas and the order of botanists. Amsterdam, 1768. 2 Volumes. 4to.

Schenck a Grafenberg (Joannis) Observationum medicarum, rararum, novarum, admirabilium et monstrosarum Libri VII. Francofurti, 1600, 8vo.

Schenck and Grafenberg (Joannis) Medical Observations, Rare, New, Amazing, and Strange, Book VII. Frankfurt, 1600, 8vo.

DD. Schilleri (Joachimi—ab Herderen) physici, De peste Brittannica Commentariolus vere aureus. Ad hæc Alexandri Benedicti Veronensis, etc. De observatione in pestilentia Libellus, etc. Basileæ, 1531, 8vo. (Im Besitz des Verfassers.)

DD. Schilleri (Joachimi—ab Herderen) physicist, On the British Plague A truly golden commentary. Also, Alexander Benedicti of Verona, etc. On Observations in the Plague, etc. Basel, 1531, 8vo. (In the author's possession.)

Schmidt (Tobias) Chronica Cygnea, oder Beschreibung der Stadt Zwickau u. s. w. Zwickau, 1656, 4to.

Schmidt (Tobias) Chronica Cygnea, or Description of the City of Zwickau etc. Zwickau, 1656, 4to.

Schneideri (Conradi Victoris) Libri de Catarrhis quinque et specialissimus. Wittebergæ, 1660–74, 4to.

Schneideri (Conradi Victoris) Five Books on Catarrhs and the Most Specific. Wittenberg, 1660–74, 4to.

Schnurrer (Friedrich) Chronik der Seuchen. 2 Thle. Tübingen, 1823–25, 8vo.

Schnurrer (Friedrich) Chronik der Seuchen. 2 Vols. Tübingen, 1823–25, 8vo.

Schwelin (Narcissus) Würtembergische kleine Chronica. Stuttgart, 1660, 8vo.

Schwelin (Narcissus) Würtembergische kleine Chronica. Stuttgart, 1660, 8vo.

Scriptorum de rebus Marchiæ Brandenburgensis maxime celebrium, Nicolai Leuthingeri nec non Zachariæ Garcæi, etc., in unum volumen Collectio. Præfat. est Joh. Gottl. Krause. Francofurti et Lipsiæ, 1729, 4to.

Scriptorum on the notable events of Brandenburg March, including works by Nicolaus Leuthinger and Zacharias Garca, compiled into one volume. Preface by Johann Gottlieb Krause. Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1729, 4to.

Sennert (Danielis) De Scorbuto Tractatus. Cui accesserunt eiusdem argumenti tractatus et epistolæ: Bald. Ronssei, Jo. Echthii, Jo. Wieri, Jo. Langii, Sall. Alberti, Matth. Martini. Wittebergæ, 1624, 8vo.348

Sennert (Danielis) On Scurvy: A Treatise. To which are added treatises and letters on the same topic by Bald. Ronssei, Jo. Echthii, Jo. Wieri, Jo. Langii, Sall. Alberti, Matth. Martini. Wittenberg, 1624, 8vo.348

Sette (Vincenzo) Memoria storico naturale sull’ Arrossimento straordinario di alcune sostanze alimentose, osservato nella provincia di Padova l’anno 1819. Venezia, 1814, 8vo.

Sette (Vincenzo) Historical and Natural Memoir on the Extraordinary Reddish Appearance of Certain Food Substances, Observed in the Province of Padua in the Year 1819. Venice, 1814, 8vo.

Short (Thomas) A general chronological History of the air, weather, seasons, meteors, etc., in sundry places and different times; more particularly for the space of 250 years. In two voll. London, 1749, 8vo.

Short (Thomas) A general chronological history of the air, weather, seasons, meteors, etc., in various places and different times; especially covering a period of 250 years. In two volumes. London, 1749, 8vo.

Sigeberti Gemblacensis cŒnobitæ Chronicon, ab anno, 381 ad 1113. Paris, ap. H. Stephan. 1513, 4to.

Sigeberti Gemblacensis Cœnobitæ Chronicon, from the year 381 to 1113. Paris, ap. H. Stephan. 1513, 4to.

Sinner (Joseph Michael) Darstellung eines rhevmatischen Schweissfiebers, welches zu Ende des Novembers 1802, in dem churfürstlich-würzburgischen Städtchen Röttingen an der Tauber endemisch herrschte. Würzburg, 1803, 8vo. (Im Besitz des Hrn. Professor Fuchs in Würzburg.)

Sinner (Joseph Michael) Presentation of a rheumatic sweat fever, which was endemic in the princely town of Röttingen on the Tauber at the end of November 1802. Würzburg, 1803, 8vo. (In the possession of Mr. Professor Fuchs in Würzburg.)

Sleidani (Joannnis) De statu religionis et reipublicæ Carolo quinto Cæsare Commentarii. Ed. Jo. Gotti. Boehme et Christ. Carol. Am Ende. 3 Partt. Francofurti a. M. 1785, 86, 8vo.

Sleidani (Joannnis) On the State of Religion and the Republic under Charles V Cæsar Commentary. Ed. Jo. Gotti. Boehme et Christ. Carol. At the End. 3 Parts. Frankfurt am Main 1785, 86, 8vo.

Spangenberg (Cyriacus) Mansfeldische Chronica. Eisleben, 1572, fol.

Spangenberg (Cyriacus) Mansfeld Chronicles. Eisleben, 1572, fol.

Spangenberg (Cyriacus) Historia von der flechtenden Kranckheit der Pestilentz, wie die von anfang her umb unser Sünde willen inn der Welt gewütet hat, das ist, alle schwinde Pestilentzische sterben derer inn Historien und Chroniken gedacht wird. 1552, 4to. (Ohne Druckort und Seitenzahlen.)

Spangenberg (Cyriacus) History of the Fleeting Illness of the Plague, detailing how it has ravaged the world since the beginning due to our sins, including all the various deadly plagues mentioned in history and chronicles. 1552, 4to. (No place of printing and page numbers.)

Staphorst (Nicolaus) Historia ecclesiæ Hamburgensis diplomatica, d. i. Hamburgische Kirchengeschichte aus glaubwürdigen und mehrentheils noch ungedruckten Urkunden gesammlet. 2 Theile in 5 Bänden. Hamburg, 1723–29, 4to.

Staphorst (Nicolaus) History of the Church in Hamburg, diplomatic documents, i. Hamburg Church History collected from credible and mostly still unpublished records. 2 Parts in 5 Volumes. Hamburg, 1723–29, 4to.

Stelzner (Michael Gottlieb) Versuch einer zuverlässigen Nachricht von dem kirchlichen und politischen Zustande der Stadt Hamburg. 4 Bände. Hamburg, 1731, 8vo.

Stelzner (Michael Gottlieb) An Attempt at a Reliable Account of the Church and Political Condition of the City of Hamburg. 4 Volumes. Hamburg, 1731, 8vo.

Stettler (Michael) Annales oder gründliche Beschreibung der fürnembsten geschichten und Thaten, welche sich in gantzer Helvetia u. s. w. verlauffen. 2 Theile. Bern, 1627, fol.

Stettler (Michael) Annals or Detailed Description of the Most Important Histories and Events That Occurred Throughout All of Switzerland, etc. 2 Parts. Bern, 1627, fol.

Stow (John) The Annales of England, faithfully collected out of the most autenticall Authors, Records, and other Monuments of Antiquitie, from the first inhabitation untill this present yeere 1592. London, 1592, 4to.349

Stow (John) The Annals of England, accurately gathered from the most authentic sources, records, and other historical artifacts, from the earliest settlement up to this present year, 1592. London, 1592, 4to.349

Stumpff (Johann) Schweytzer Chronick, d. i. Beschreybunge Gemeiner löblicher Eydgenoschafft Stetten, Landen, Völcker und dero Chronickwirdigen Thaaten. Zürich, 1606, fol.

Stumpff (Johann) Schweytzer Chronicle, or Description of the Common and Honorable Confederation of States, Lands, Peoples, and Their Noteworthy Actions. Zurich, 1606, fol.

Thuani (Jacobi Augusti—de Thou) Historiarum sui temporis Volumina IV. Offenbachii et Ysemburgi, 1609, fol.

Thuani (Jacobi Augusti—de Thou) Historiarum sui temporis Volumina IV. Offenbach and Ysemburg, 1609, fol.

Valesii (Caroli) du Bourgdieu, Physici patria Burdegalensis, Commentarii de Peste et Exanthematibus[521] ad Alexandrum VII. Pontificem O. M. Romæ, 1656, 4to.

Valesii (Caroli) du Bourgdieu, Physician from Bordeaux, Commentaries on Plague and Exanthematous Diseases[521] to Alexander VII. Pope O.M. in Rome, 1656, 4to.

Valleriolæ (Francisci) Loci medicinæ communes, tribus Libris digesti. Lugduni, 1562, fol.

Valleriolæ (Francisci) Common Places of Medicine, organized in three books. Lyon, 1562, fol.

Velschii (Georgii Hieronymi) Sylloge curationum et observationum medicinalium. Augustæ Vindelicorum, 1668, 4to.

Velschii (Georgii Hieronymi) Collection of Medical Treatments and Observations Augsburg, 1668, 4to.

Vergilii (Polydori) Urbinatis Anglicæ Historiæ Libri XXVII. Basil. 1556, fol.

Vergilii (Polydori) Urbinatis Anglicæ Historiæ Books XXVII. Basil. 1556, fol.

Verulam (Lord Francis) Viscount St. Alban, The Historie of the Raigne of King Henry the seventh. London, 1622, fol.

Verulam (Lord Francis) Viscount St. Alban, The History of the Reign of King Henry VII. London, 1622, fol.

Villalba (Don Joaquin de) Epidemiologia Española ó Historia cronológica de las pestes, contagios, epidemias y epizootias que han acaecido en España desde la venida de los Cartagineses hasta el año 1801, etc. 2 Tom. Madrid, 1803, 8vo.

Villalba (Don Joaquin de) Spanish Epidemiology or Chronological History of the Plagues, Contagions, Epidemics, and Epizootics that have occurred in Spain from the arrival of the Carthaginians until the year 1801, etc. 2 Vols. Madrid, 1803, 8vo.

Wagenaar (Jan) Amsterdam in zyne opkomst, aanwas, geschiedenissen, voorregten, koophandel, etc., beschreeven. Amsterdam, 1760–65. 8 Bände, 8vo.

Wagenaar (Jan) Amsterdam in its rise, growth, histories, privileges, trade, etc., described. Amsterdam, 1760–65. 8 volumes, 8vo.

Webster (Noah) A brief History of epidemic and pestilential diseases, with the principal phenomena of the physical world, which precede and accompany them, and observations deduced from the facts stated. 2 Voll. Hartford, 1799, 8vo.

Webster (Noah) A Brief History of Epidemic and Pestilential Diseases, along with the main phenomena of the physical world that come before and accompany them, and observations derived from the facts presented. 2 Vols. Hartford, 1799, 8vo.

Werlich (Engelbert) Chronica der weitberuempten Keyserlichen freyen und dess H. Reichs Statt Augspurg. (Nach Marx Welser.) Franckfurt a. M. 1595, fol.

Werlich (Engelbert) Chronicle of the Highly Renowned Imperial Free City of Augsburg. (According to Marx Welser.) Frankfurt a. M. 1595, fol.

Wintzenberger (Daniel, von Grim) Warhafftige Geschichte, und gedenckwirdiger Händel, so von dem 1500. Jar an, bis auff dis 1583. Jar ergangen, kurtz und richtig nach der Ordnung der Jare. Dresden, 1583, 4to.

Wintzenberger (Daniel, von Grim) True History and Memorable Events from the Year 1500 to 1583, briefly and accurately arranged by year. Dresden, 1583, 4to.

Wild (Doktor Peters—von Ysni) tröstlicher Bericht, vonn der newen erstanden Kranckheyt, die schweyfssucht genant. An eyn Ersamen Rath und gemeyn diser löblichen Statt Wormbs. Getrukt zu Wormbs durch Hans Mechel, 1529, 3508vo. (Im wörtlichen Auszuge in Baldinger’s neuem Magazin für Aerzte, Bd. IV. St. 3. 1782. S. 277.)

Wild (Doctor Peters—of Ysni) comforting report on the new illness known as syphilis. Presented to the esteemed council and citizens of this honorable city of Worms. Printed in Worms by Hans Mechel, 1529, 3508vo. (In a literal excerpt in Baldinger’s new magazine for doctors, Vol. IV. No. 3. 1782. p. 277.)

Witichindi (monachi Corbeiensis) Annales. Ed. Reiner. Reineccii, Steinhemii. Francofurti a. M. 1577, fol.

Witichindi (monachi Corbeiensis) Annals. Ed. Reiner. Reineccii, Steinhemii. Frankfurt a. M. 1577, fol.

Wood (Anton.) Historia et Antiquitates Universitatis Oxoniensis. 2 Tom. Oxon. 1674, fol.

Wood (Anton.) History and Antiquities of the University of Oxford. 2 Vols. Oxford, 1674, fol.

Wurstisen (Christian) Bassler Chronicle. Basel, 1580, fol.

Wurstisen (Christian) Bassler Chronicle. Basel, 1580, fol.


351

351

APPENDIX.

353

A BOKE, OR COUNSEILL
AGAINST
THE DISEASE
COMMONLY CALLED
THE SWEATER,
OR
SWEATYNG SICKNESSE.
MADE BY JOHN CAIUS
Doctor in Physics.
UERY NECESSARY FOR EUERYE PERSONNE, AND MUCHE
REQUISITE TO BE HAD IN THE HANDES OF AL
SORTES, FOR THEIR BETTER INSTRUCTION,
PREPARACION AND DEFENCE, AGAINST
THE SOUBDEIN COMYNG, AND FEARFUL
ASSAULTING OF THE SAME
DISEASE.
1552.

355

355

TO THE RIGHTE HONOURABLE
WILLIAM EARL OF PENBROKE,
LORDE HARBERT OF CARDIFE, KNIGHT OF THE
HONOURABLE ORDRE OF THE GARTER, AND
PRESIDENT OF THE KYNGES HIGHNES
COUNSEILL IN THE MARCHES
OF WALES:
Jhon Caius
WISHETH HELTH AND HONOUR.

In the fereful tyme of the sweate (ryghte honourable) many resorted vnto me for counseil, among whōe some beinge my frendes & aquaintance, desired me to write vnto them some litle counseil howe to gouerne themselues therin: saiyng also that I should do a greate pleasure to all my frendes and contrimen, if I would deuise at my laisure some thīg, whiche from tyme to tyme might remaine, wherto men might in such cases haue a recourse & present refuge at all nedes, as thē they had none. At whose requeste, at that tyme I wrate diuerse counseiles so shortly as I could for the present necessite, whiche they bothe vsed and dyd geue abrode to many others, & further appoynted in my self to fulfill (for so much as laye in me) the other parte of their honest request for the time to come. The whiche the better to execute and brynge to passe, I spared not to go to all those that sente for me, bothe poore, and riche, day and night. And that not only to do thē that ease that I could, & to instructe thē for their recouery: but to note also throughly, the cases and circumstaunces of the disease in diuerse persons, and to vnderstande the nature and causes of the same fully, for so much as might be. Therefore as I noted, so I wrate as laisure then serued, and finished one boke in Englishe, onely for Englishe mē not lerned, one other in latine for men of lerninge more at large, and generally for the help of thē which hereafter should haue nede, either in this or other coūtreis, that they may lerne by our harmes. This I had thoughte to haue set furth before christmas, & to haue geuē to your lordshippe at new-yeres tide, but that356 diuerse other businesses letted me. Neuertheles that which then coulde not be done cometh not now out of season, although it be neuer so simple, so it may do ease hereafter, which as I trust this shal, so for good wil I geue and dedicate it vnto your good Lordshippe, trustyng the same will take this with as good a mind, as I geue it to your honour, whiche our Lorde preserue and graunt long to continue.

In the fearful time of the sweat (extremely honorable), many came to me for advice, including some friends and acquaintances who asked me to write them a little guidance on how to manage themselves during this time. They also said it would be a huge favor to all my friends and countrymen if I could come up with something that they could refer to whenever they needed support, as they had none at that moment. At their request, I wrote various pieces of advice as quickly as I could for the urgent need, which they used and shared with many others. I also committed to fulfill the other part of their sincere request for the future. To better carry this out, I didn’t hesitate to visit everyone who called for me, both the poor and the rich, day and night. Not only to help them find relief and guide them towards recovery, but also to thoroughly observe the cases and circumstances of the illness in different people and to fully understand its nature and causes as much as I could. So, as I took notes, I wrote as I had time and completed one book in English, specifically for English-speaking people who are not learned, and another in Latin for educated individuals in more depth, generally for the benefit of those who might need it in the future, either in this country or elsewhere, so they could learn from our misfortunes. I had intended to release this before Christmas and to present it to your lordship at New Year's, but various other responsibilities prevented me. Nevertheless, what couldn’t be done then is still timely now, no matter how simple, as it may provide comfort in the future, which I hope it will. Therefore, I dedicate it sincerely to your good lordship, trusting that you will accept it with as much goodwill as I offer it to your honor, which may our Lord preserve and grant to continue for a long time.

At London the first of Aprill.
1552.

357
THE
BOKE OF JHON CAIUS
AGAINST
THE SWEATING SICKNESS.

Man beyng borne not for his owne vse and cōmoditie alone, but also for the commō benefite of many, (as reason wil and al good authoures write) he whiche in this world is worthy to lyue, ought al wayes to haue his hole minde and intente geuen to profite others. Whiche thynge to shewe in effecte in my selfe, although by fortune some waies I haue ben letted, yet by that whiche fortune cannot debarre some waies again I haue declared. For after certein yeres beyng at cambrige, I of the age of xx. yeres, partly for mine exercise and profe what I coulde do, but chefely for certein of my very frēdes, dyd translate out of Latine into Englishe certein workes, hauyng nothynge els so good to gratifie theim wt. Wherof one of S. Chrysostome de modo orandi deum, that is, of ye manner to praye to god, I sent to one my frende then beyng in the courte. One other, a woorke of Erasmus de vera theologia, the true and redy waye to reade the scripture, I dyd geue to Maister Augustine Stiwarde Alderman of Norwiche, not in the ful as the authore made it, but abbreuiate for his only purpose to whome I sent it, Leuyng out many subtile thinges, made rather for great & learned diuines, thē for others. The thirde was the paraphrase of the same Erasmus vpon the Epistle of S. Jude, whiche I translated at the requeste of one other my deare frende.

Man is not born just for his own use and benefit, but also for the common good of many, as reason dictates and all good authorities say. Anyone who deserves to live in this world should always focus their mind and efforts on helping others. I’ve tried to embody this principle in my own life. Although I've faced some obstacles due to circumstances, there are ways fortune cannot hinder, and I've shown that too. After spending several years at Cambridge, at the age of 20, I translated certain works from Latin into English, partly to challenge myself and see what I could accomplish, but mainly for a few of my close friends, having nothing better to offer them. One of the works was by S. Chrysostome de modo orandi deum, which is about how to pray to God; I sent that to a friend of mine who was at court. Another was a piece by Erasmus de vera theologia, outlining the true and straightforward way to read the scripture, which I gave to Master Augustine Stiwarde, Alderman of Norwich. I didn’t provide the full text as the author wrote it, but summarized it specifically for him, leaving out many subtle points that were more suited for great and learned theologians than for others. The third was Erasmus's paraphrase on the Epistle of S. Jude, which I translated at the request of another dear friend of mine.

These I did in Englishe the rather because at that tyme men ware not so geuen all to Englishe, but that they dyd fauoure & maȳteine good learning conteined in tongues & sciences, and did also study and apply diligently the same thē selues. Therfore I thought no hurte done. Sence yt tyme diuerse other thynges I haue written, but with entente neuer more to write in the Englishe tongue, partly because the cōmoditie of that which is so written, passeth not the compasse of Englande, but remaineth enclosed within the seas, and partly because I thought that labours so taken should be halfe loste among them whiche sette not by learnyng. Thirdly for that I thought it beste to auoide the iudgement of the358 multitude, from whome in maters of learnyng a man shalbe forced to dissente, in disprouyng that whiche they most approue, & approuyng that whiche they moste disalowe. Fourthly for that the common settyng furthe and printīg of euery foolishe thyng in englishe, both of phisicke vnperfectly, and other matters vndiscretly diminishe the grace of thynges learned set furth in thesame. But chiefely, because I wolde geue none example or comforte to my countrie men, (whō I wolde to be now, as here tofore they haue bene, comparable in learnyng to men of other countries) to stonde onely in the Englishe tongue, but to leaue the simplicite of thesame, and to procede further in many and diuerse knoweleges bothe in tongues and sciences at home and in vniuersities, to the adournyng of the cōmon welthe, better seruice of their kyng, & great pleasure and commodite of their owne selues, to what kinde of life so euer they shold applie them. Therfore whatsoeuer sence that tyme I minded to write, I wrate ye same either in greke or latine. As firste of all certein commentaries vpon certein bokes of William framinghā, maister of art in Cambrige, a man of great witte, memorie, diligence and learnyng, brought vp in thesame scholes in Englande that I was, euer frō his beginnyng vntil his death. Of the which bokes, ij. of cōtinētia (or cōtinence) wer in prose, ye reste in metre or verse of diuerse kindes. One a comforte for a blinde mā, entitled ad Aemilianum cæcum consolatio, one other Ecpyrosis, seu incendiū sodomorū, the burnyng of Sodome. The thirde Laurentius, expressyng the tormentes of Saincte Laurence. The fourthe, Idololatria, Idolatrie, not after the trade and veine of scripture (wherein he was also very well exercised) but conformable to scripture and after the ciuile and humane learnyng, declaryng them to worshippe Mars, that warre, or fight: Venus, that lyue incontinently: Pluto, that folowe riches couetousely; and so forth through all vices vsed in his time. The fineth boke Arete, vertue: the sixth, Epigrāmes, conteined in two bokes, whiche by an epistle of his owne hand before ye boke yet remainyng, he dedicated vnto me, purposyng to haue done many more prety thynges, but that cruell death preuēted, and toke him away wher he and I was borne at Norwiche, in the yere of our Lord M.d.xxxvij. the xxix. daie of September, beynge then of the age of xxv. yeres, vij. Monethes, and vj. daies, a greate losse of so notable a yonge man. These workes at his death he willed to comme to my handes, by which occasion after I had viewed thē, and perceiued them ful of al kyndes of learnyng, thinkyng thē no workes for all mē to vnderstande with out helpe, but such as were wel sene in all sortes of authours: I endeuoured my selfe partely for the helpe of others, & partly for mine owne exercise, to declare vpon theim the profite of my studie in ciuile and humane learnynge, and to haue before mine eyes as in a worke (which was alwaies my delyght) how muche I had profited in the same.359 Thys so done, I ioyned euery of my commentaries to euery of hys saied bokes, faier written by Nicolas Pergate puple to the saied Maister Framyngham, myndyng after the iudgement of learned men had in thesame, to haue set theim furthe in prynte, if it had ben so thought good to theim. For whyche cause, at my departynge into Italie, I put an Epistle before theym dedicatorye to the right Reuerend father in God Thomas Thirlbye, now Bishoppe of Norwiche, because thesame maister Framyngham loued hym aboue others. He after my departure deliuered the bokes to the reuerende father in god Jhō Skippe, late bishop of Hereforde, then to D. Thirtle, tutor to the sayd maister framynhā, frō him to syr Richard Morisine, now ambassadoure for ye kinges maiestie with thēperour, then to D. Tailour Deane of Lincolne, and syr Thomas Smithe, secretarie after to ye kynges Maiestie, all great learned men. Frō these to others they wente, among whome the bokes died, (as I suppose,) or els be closely kept, that after my death they may be setfurthe in the names of them which now haue thē, as their workes. Howe soeuer it be, wel I knowe that at my returne out of Italie (after vj. yeres continuance ther) into Englād, I coulde neuer vnderstand wher they wer, although I bothe diligently and desirousely sought thē. After these I translated out of Greke into Latine a litle boke of Nicephorus, declarynge howe a man maye in praiynge confesse hym selfe, which after I dyd geue vnto Jhō Grome bacheler in arte, a yong man in yeres, but in witte & learnyng for his tyme, of great expectatiō. That done I beganne a chronicle of the citie of Norwiche, of the beginninge therof & thinges done ther frō time to time. The matere wherof yet rude and vndigested lyeth by me, which at laisure I minde to polishe, and to make an end of that I haue begunne. And to be shorte, in phisicke diuerse thynges I haue made & settefurth in print bothe in Greke and Latine, not mindyng to do other wise, as I haue before said, al my life: For which cause al these thinges I haue rehersed, els superfluous in this place. Yet see, meaning now to counseill a litle agaynst the sweatyng sickenes for helpe also of others, notwithstandyng my former purpose, two thynges compell me, in writynge therof, to returne agayne to Englishe, Necessite of the matter, & good wyl to my countrie, frendes, & acquaintance, whiche here to haue required me, to whome I thinke my selfe borne.

I did these in English mainly because at that time people weren't fully invested in English; they still appreciated and supported good learning found in different languages and fields, and they diligently studied and applied the same themselves. Therefore, I thought it wouldn’t cause any harm. Since then, I have written various other things, but I intended never to write again in English, partly because the value of what is written this way doesn’t go beyond England, remaining confined within the seas, and partly because I believed such efforts would be half wasted among those who don’t appreciate learning. Thirdly, I thought it best to avoid the judgment of the 358 crowd, from whom one is forced to disagree, rejecting what they most approve and endorsing what they most disapprove. Fourthly, because the widespread dissemination and printing of every foolish thing in English, both of imperfect physics and other matters foolishly, diminishes the value of learned works published in the same. But chiefly because I didn’t want to set an example or encourage my countrymen, whom I want to be, as they once were, comparable in learning to men of other countries, to rely solely on the English language, but to leave its simplicity and advance further in diverse knowledge in both languages and sciences at home and in universities, enhancing the common good, serving their king better, and bringing great pleasure and benefit to themselves, regardless of the kind of life they choose to pursue. Therefore, whatever meaning I intended to convey at that time, I wrote it in either Greek or Latin. First of all, certain commentaries on certain books by William Framlingham, a master of arts at Cambridge, a man of great wit, memory, diligence, and learning, raised in the same schools in England where I was, from his beginning to his death. Of these books, two on continente were in prose, the rest in various kinds of verse. One was a comfort for a blind man, entitled ad Aemilianum cæcum consolatio, another Ecpyrosis, seu incendiū sodomorū, the burning of Sodom. The third was Laurentius, expressing the torments of Saint Laurence. The fourth, Idololatria, Idolatry, not following the style and vein of scripture (in which he was also very well practiced) but consistent with scripture and according to civil and human learning, declaring them to worship Mars, the god of war; Venus, the goddess of promiscuity; Pluto, who pursues riches greedily; and so forth through all the vices of his time. The finest book is Arete, virtue; the sixth, Epigrams, contained in two books, which by a letter of his own hand before the book still remaining, he dedicated to me, intending to create many more delightful things, but cruel death intervened and took him away where he and I were born in Norwich, in the year of our Lord 1537, on the 29th day of September, being then 25 years, 7 months, and 6 days old, a great loss of such a notable young man. At his death, he willed these works to come into my hands, an occasion which after I had reviewed them and found them full of all kinds of learning, I thought them not simple enough for everyone to understand without help, but only for those who were well-versed in various authors: I endeavored partly for the benefit of others, and partly for my own practice, to explain upon them the profit of my study in civil and humane learning, and to keep before my eyes, as in a work (which has always delighted me), how much I had progressed in the same.359 Having done this, I joined each of my commentaries to each of his aforementioned books, nicely written by Nicholas Pergate, student of the said Master Framlingham, intending, after the judgment of learned men had been taken on them, to publish them, if it were deemed good to do so. For this reason, at my departure to Italy, I placed a dedicatory Epistle before them to the Right Reverend Father in God Thomas Thirlbye, now Bishop of Norwich, because the said Master Framlingham loved him above others. After my departure, he delivered the books to the Reverend Father in God John Skippe, late Bishop of Hereford, then to Dr. Thirtle, tutor to the said Master Framlingham, from him to Sir Richard Morisine, now ambassador for the King’s Majesty with the Emperor, then to Dr. Tailour Dean of Lincoln, and Sir Thomas Smith, secretary afterward to the King’s Majesty, all great learned men. From these, they passed to others among whom the books presumably died, or else were kept closely, so that after my death they might be published in the names of those who now have them, as their works. However it may be, I know well that at my return from Italy (after six years there) to England, I could never find out where they were, even though I diligently and desirously sought them. After these, I translated a little book of Nicephorus from Greek into Latin, explaining how a man may confess himself in prayer, which I later gave to John Grome, a bachelor in arts, a young man in years, but in wit and learning, for his time, of great expectation. That done, I began a chronicle of the city of Norwich, detailing its beginnings and things done there from time to time. The matter thereof, still rough and unpolished, lies by me, which I intend to refine and finish what I have begun. And to be brief, in physics I have made and published various things in both Greek and Latin, never intending to do otherwise, as I mentioned before, all my life. For this reason, I have recounted all these things, else they would be superfluous in this place. Yet now, intending to advise a little against the sweating sickness for the help of others, nevertheless contrary to my former purpose, two things compel me to return again to English: the necessity of the matter and goodwill to my countrymen, friends, and acquaintances who here have asked me, to whom I consider myself born.

Necessite, for that this disease is almoste peculiar vnto vs Englishe men, and not common to all men, folowyng vs, as the shadowe the body, in all countries, albeit not at al times. Therfore compelled I am to vse this our Englishe tongue as best to be vnderstande, and moste nedeful to whome it most foloweth, most behoueth to haue spedy remedie, and often tymes leaste nyghe to places of succource and comforte at lerned mennes handes: and leaste nedefull to be setfurthe in other tongues to be vnderstand generally of all persons, whome it either haunteth not360 at all, or els very seldome, as ones in an age. Thinkynge it also better to write this in Englishe after mine own meanyng, then to haue it translated out of my Latine by other after their misunderstandyng.

This disease seems to be almost unique to us English men and isn’t common to everyone else, following us like a shadow follows the body, in various countries, though not all the time. Therefore, I’m compelled to use our English language as it is most understandable and necessary for those it primarily affects, who urgently need a remedy, often being closest to places of help and comfort provided by learned individuals. It is less essential to present this in other languages for general understanding by all, especially those it does not affect at all or only very rarely, like once in a lifetime. I also believe it’s better to write this in English according to my own meaning than to have it translated from my Latin by others who might misunderstand it.

Good wyll to my countrie frendes and acquaintance, seynge them wyth out defence yelde vnto it, and it ferefully to inuade thē, furiousely handle them, spedily oppresse them, vnmercyfully choke them, and that in no small numbers, and such persons so notably noble in birthe, goodly conditions, graue sobrietie, singular wisedōe, and great learnynge, as Henry Duke of Suffolke, and the lorde Charles his brother, as fewe hath bene sene lyke of their age: an heuy & pitifull thyng to here or see. So that if by onely learned men in phisicke & not this waye also it should be holpen, it were nedeful almost halfe so many learned men to be redy in euery toune and citie, as their should be sweatynge sicke folkes. Yet this notwithstandynge, I wyll euery man not to refuse the counseill of the present or nighe physicen learned, who maie, accordyng to the place, persone, cause, & other circūstances, geue more particular counseil at nede, but in any wise exhorte him to seke it with all diligence. To this enterprise also amonge so many learned men, not a litle stirreth me the gentilnes and good willes of al sortes of men, which I haue well proued heretofore by my other former bokes. Mindynge therefore with as good a will to geue my counseil in this, and trusting for no lesse gentlenes in the same, I wyll plainly and in English for their better vnderstandynge to whome I write, firste declare the beginnynge, name, nature, and signes of the sweatynge sickenes. Next, the causes of the same. And thirdly, how to preserue men frō it, and remedy them whē they haue it.

Goodwill to my country friends and acquaintances, seeing them defenseless, yielding to it, and it fiercely invading them, handling them violently, rapidly oppressing them, mercilessly choking them, and this happens to no small number of like notably noble people in birth, good character, serious demeanor, unique wisdom, and great learning, such as Henry Duke of Suffolk and his brother Lord Charles, like few have been seen of their age: a heavy and pitiful thing to hear or see. So if only learned men in medicine should help without this way, it would almost need to require half as many learned men to be ready in every town and city as there should be sick people sweating. Yet despite this, I will urge everyone not to refuse the advice of the present or nearby learned physician, who can, according to the place, person, cause, and other circumstances, give more specific advice as needed, but in any case, I encourage him to seek it with all diligence. To this endeavor, among so many learned men, I’m greatly motivated by the kindness and goodwill of all sorts of people, which I have well proven before through my other previous books. Therefore, aiming with as good a will to give my advice on this, and trusting for no less kindness in the same, I will plainly and in English, for their better understanding of whom I write, first declare the beginning, name, nature, and signs of the sweating sickness. Next, the causes of it. And thirdly, how to preserve men from it, and remedy them when they have it.

The beginnyng of the disease.—In the yere of our Lorde God M.CCCC.lxxxv. shortly after the vij. daye of august, at whiche tyme kynge Henry the seuenth arriued at Milford in walles, out of Fraunce, and in the firste yere of his reigne, ther chaunced a disease among the people, lastyng the reste of that monethe & all september, which for the soubdeine sharpenes and vnwont cruelnes passed the pestilence. For this commonly geueth iij. or iiij. often vij. sumtyme ix. as that firste at Athenes whiche Thucidides describeth in his seconde boke, sumtyme xj. and sumtyme xiiij. dayes respecte, to whome it vexeth. But that immediatly killed some in opening theire windowes, some in plaieng with children in their strete dores, some in one hour, many in two it destroyed, & at the longest, to thē that merilye dined, it gaue a sorowful Supper. As it founde them so it toke them, some in sleape some in wake, some in mirthe some in care, some fasting & some ful, some busy and some idle, and in one house sometyme three sometime fiue, sometyme seuen sometyme eyght, sometyme more some tyme all, of the whyche, if the haulfe in euerye Towne escaped, it was thoughte great fauour. How, or wyth what maner it361 toke them, with what grieffe, and accidentes it helde theym, herafter thē I wil declare, whē I shal come to shewe the signes therof. In the mene space, know that this disease (because it most did stand in sweating from the beginning vntil the endyng) was called here, the Sweating sickenesse: and because it firste beganne in Englande, it was named in other countries, the englishe sweate. Yet some coniecture that it, or the like, hath bene before seene among the Grekes in the siege of Troie. In thēperor Octauius warres at Cantabria, called nowe Biscaie, in Hispaine: and in the Turkes, at the Rhodes. How true that is, let the aucthours loke: how true thys is, the best of our Chronicles shewith, & of the late begonne disease the freshe memorie yet confirmeth. But if the name wer now to be geuen, and at my libertie to make the same: I would of the maner and space of the disease (by cause the same is no sweat only, as herafter I will declare, & in the spirites) make the name Ephemera, which is to sai, a feuer of one natural dai. A feuer, for the feruor or burning, drieth & sweating feure like. Of one naturall day, for that it lasteth but the time of xxiiij. houres. And for a distinction from the commune Ephemera, that Galene writeth of, comming both of other causes, and wyth vnlike paines, I wold putte to it either Englishe, for that it followeth somoche English menne, to whō it is almoste proper, and also began here: or els pestilent, for that it cōmeth by infection & putrefaction, otherwise then doth the other Ephemera. Whiche thing I suppose may the better be done, because I se straunge and no english names both in Latine and Greke by commune vsage taken for Englishe. As in Latin, Feure, Quotidiā, Tertian, Quartane, Aier, Infection, Pestilence, Uomite, Person, Reines, Ueines, Peines, Chamere, Numbre, &c. a litle altered by the commune pronunciation. In Greke, Pleuresie, Ischiada, Hydrops, Apostema, Phlegma, and Chole: called by the vulgare pronunciatiō, Schiatica, Dropsie, Impostume, Phleume, & Choler: Gyne also, and Boutyre, Sciourel, Mouse, Rophe, Phrase, Paraphrase, & cephe, wherof cometh Chaucers couercephe, in the romant of the Rose, writtē and pronoūced comōly, kerchief in ye south, & courchief in the north. Thereof euery head or principall thing, is comonlye called cephe, pronoūced & writtē, chief. Uery many other there be in our commune tongue, whiche here to rehearse were to long. These for an example shortelye I haue here noted. But for the name of this disease it maketh now no matter, the name of Sweat beyng cōmōly vsed. Let vs therfore returne to the thing, which as occasiō & cause serued, came againe in the M.D.vi. the xxii. yeare of the said Kyng Henry the seuenth. Aftre that, in the yeare M.D.xvii. the ix. yeare of Kyng Henry the viii, and endured from July, vnto ye middest of Decēbre. The iiii tyme, in the yeare M.D.xxviii. the xx. yeare of thesaied Kyng, beginning in thende of May, & continuing June and362 July. The fifth tyme of this fearful Ephemera of Englande, and pestilent sweat, is this in the yeare M.D.LI. of oure Lorde GOD, and the fifth yeare of oure Souereigne Lorde king Edwarde the sixth, beginning at Shrewesbury in the middest of April, proceadinge with greate mortalitie to Ludlowe, Prestene, and other places in Wales, then to Westchestre, Couentre, Drenfoorde, and other tounes in the Southe, and suche as were in and aboute the way to London, whether it came notablie the seuenth of July, and there continuing sore, with the losse of vii. C. lxi. from the ix. day vntil the xvi. daye, besides those that died in the vii. and viii. dayes, of whō no registre was kept, frō that it abated vntil the xxx. day of the same, with the losse of C. xlii. more. Then ceassing there, it wente from thence throughe al the east partes of England into the Northe vntill the ende of Auguste, at whiche tyme it diminished, and in the ende of Septembre fully ceassed.

The beginning of the disease.—In the year of our Lord 1485, shortly after the 7th day of August, when King Henry the Seventh arrived at Milford in Wales from France, a disease broke out among the people. It lasted for the remainder of that month and all of September, and due to its sudden sharpness and unusual cruelty, it surpassed the plague. Typically, the plague would last 3 or 4 days, often 7, sometimes 9, as described by Thucydides in his second book, sometimes 11, and at times 14 days for those it afflicted. But this disease abruptly killed some while they were opening their windows, some while playing with children at their doorsteps, some in just one hour, many in two, and at most, those who happily dined were left with a sorrowful supper. It took them as it found them—some in sleep, some awake, some in joy, some in distress, some fasting and some full, some busy and some idle, and in one house sometimes three, sometimes five, sometimes seven, sometimes eight, and sometimes more—at times, even all. If half the people in any town escaped, it was regarded as a great favor. How or in what manner it affected them, the grief and accidents it brought will be explained later when I discuss its signs. In the meantime, know that this disease (because it primarily involved sweating from beginning to end) was called the Sweating Sickness; and since it first began in England, it was referred to in other countries as the English Sweat. However, some speculate that it, or something similar, has been seen before among the Greeks during the siege of Troy, in the wars of Emperor Octavius in Cantabria, now known as Biscay, in Spain, and among the Turks at Rhodes. How true that is, let the authors look into, yet the best of our chronicles show how true this is, and the recent memory of the disease confirms it. But if I were to give it a name now, based on its nature and duration (since it is not just a sweat, as I will explain later, and in its impact), I would call it Ephemera, meaning a fever of one natural day. A fever, due to the heat or burning, resembles excessive sweating. Of one natural day, as it lasts only the time of 24 hours. And to distinguish it from the common Ephemera that Galen wrote about, which comes from other causes and has different pains, I would either add English to it, since it predominantly affects English people, to whom it is almost indigenous and began here, or else call it pestilent, because it comes from infection and putrefaction, unlike the other Ephemera. I believe this can be better accomplished because I see strange and non-English names both in Latin and Greek commonly used for English. For instance, in Latin, Fever, Quotidian, Tertian, Quartan, Air, Infection, Pestilence, Vomiting, Person, Kidneys, Veins, Pains, Chamber, Number, etc., slightly altered by common pronunciation. In Greek, Pleurisy, Sciatica, Dropsy, Abscess, Phlegm, and Bile, which are referred to by popular pronunciation as Sciatica, Dropsy, Abscess, Phlegm, and Bile; Gyne as well, and Butyre, Squirrel, Mouse, Physician, Phrase, Paraphrase, and chief, from which comes Chaucer's couercephe, in the Romance of the Rose, written and commonly pronounced as kerchief in the south, and courchief in the north. Therefore, every main thing is commonly referred to as chief. There are many other examples in our common tongue, but it would be too lengthy to list them all here. These are just a few noted briefly. But for the name of this disease, it matters not, as the name of Sweat is commonly used. Let us then return to the matter, which, as occasion and cause served, appeared again in 1506, the 22nd year of King Henry the Seventh. After that, in the year 1517, the 9th year of King Henry the Eighth, it lasted from July until the middle of December. The fourth occurrence was in the year 1528, the 20th year of the same King, starting at the end of May and continuing through June and362 July. The fifth instance of this dreadful Ephemera of England and pestilent sweat occurred in the year 1551, in the fifth year of our Sovereign Lord King Edward the Sixth, beginning in Shrewsbury in mid-April, spreading with great mortality to Ludlow, Presteigne, and other places in Wales, then to Chester, Coventry, Drenford, and other towns in the south, and notably reaching London on the 7th of July, where it continued severely, resulting in the loss of 761 lives from the 9th day until the 16th, besides those who died on the 7th and 8th days, for whom no record was kept. It lessened after that until the 30th day of the same month, with the loss of 142 more. Then ceasing there, it spread through all the eastern parts of England to the north until the end of August, at which time it subsided, and by the end of September, it completely ceased.

This disease is not a Sweat onely, (as it is thought & called) but a feuer, as I saied, in the spirites by putrefaction venemous, with a fight, trauaile, and laboure of nature againste the infection receyued in the spirites, whervpon by chaunce foloweth a Sweate, or issueth an humour compelled by nature, as also chanceth in other sicknesses whiche consiste in humours, when they be in their state, and at the worste in certein dayes iudicial, aswel by vomites, bledinges, & fluxes, as by sweates. That this is true, the self sweates do shewe. For as in vtter businesses, bodies yˆt sore do labour, by trauail of the same are forced to sweat, so in inner diseases, the bodies traueiled & labored by thē, are moued to the like. In which labors, if nature be strōg & able to thrust out the poisō by sweat (not otherwise letted) yˆe persō escapeth: if not, it dieth. That it is a feuer, thus I haue partly declared, and more wil streight by the notes of the disease, vnder one shewing also by thesame notes, signes, and short tariance of the same, that it consisteth in the spirites. First by the peine in the backe, or shoulder, peine in the extreme partes, as arme, or legge, with a flusshing, or wind, as it semeth to certeine of the pacientes, flieng in the same. Secondly by the grief in the liuer and the nigh stomacke. Thirdely, by the peine in the head, & madnes of the same. Fourthly by the passion of the hart. For the flusshing or wynde comming in the vtter and extreame partes, is nothing els but the spirites of those same gathered together, at the first entring of the euell aire, agaynste the infection therof, and flyeng thesame from place to place, for theire owne sauegarde. But at the last infected, they make a grief where thei be forced, whiche cōmonly is in tharme or legge (the fartheste partes of theire refuge) the backe or shulder: trieng ther first a brūt as good souldiers, before they wil let their enemye come further into theire dominion. The other grefes be therefore in thother partes aforsaid & sorer, because the spirites be there most plētuous as in their founteines, whether alwaies thinfection desireth 363to go. For frō the liuer, the nigh stomack, braine, and harte, come all the iij. sortes, and kyndes of spirites, the gouernoures of oure bodies, as firste spronge there. But from the hart, the liuish spirites. In putrifieng wherof by the euel aier in bodies fit for it, the harte is oppressed. Wherupon also foloweth a marueilous heauinesse, (the fifthe token of this disease,) and a desire to sleape, neuer contented, the senses in al partes beynge as they were bounde or closed vp, the partes therfore left heuy, vnliuishe, and dulle. Laste foloweth the shorte abidinge, a certeine Token of the disease to be in the spirites, as wel may be proued by the Ephemera that Galene writethe of, whiche because it consistethe in the Spirites, lasteth but one natural day. For as fire in hardes or straw, is sone in flambe & sone oute, euen so heate in the spirites, either by simple distemperature, or by infection and putrefaction therin conceyued, is sone in flambe & sone out, and soner for the vehemencye or greatnes of the same, whiche without lingering, consumeth sone the light matter, contrary to al other diseases restyng in humoures, wherin a fire ones kindeled, is not so sone put out, no more then is the same in moiste woode, or fat Sea coles, as well by the particular Example of the pestilence, (of al others most lyke vnto this) may be declared, whyche by that it stādeth in euel humors, tarieth as I said, sometyme, from iiij. vii. ix. & xj. vntill xiiij. dayes, differentlie from this, by reason therof, albeit by infection most lyke to this same. Thus vnder one laboure shortelie I haue declared—both what this disease is, wherein it consisteth, howe and with what accidentes it grieueth and is differente from the Pestilence, and the propre signes, and tokens of the same, without the whiche, if any do sweate, I take theym not to Sweate by this Sickenesse, but rather by feare, heate of the yeare, many clothes, greate exercise, affection, excesse in diete, or at the worst, by a smal cause of infection, and less disposition of the bodi to this sicknes. So that, insomoche as the body was nat al voide of matter, sweate it did when infection came: but in that the mattere was not greate, the same coulde neyther be perilous nor paineful as in others, in whom was greater cause.

This illness is not just a sweat, as people think and call it, but a fever, as I mentioned, caused by toxic decay in the spirits, with a struggle, effort, and strain of nature against the infection received in the spirits, which results in sweating or the release of humors prompted by nature, similar to what happens in other diseases that involve humors, when they are at their worst during certain critical days, manifesting through vomiting, bleeding, and discharges, as well as sweating. The sweating itself proves this point. Just as in visible ailments, the body that is in distress is compelled to sweat, so in internal diseases, the afflicted bodies are similarly triggered. In these struggles, if nature is strong enough to expel the poison through sweat (and not otherwise hindered), the person survives; if not, they die. I have partially explained that this is a fever, and I will provide further clarity through the indicators of the disease, showing that it is related to the spirits. First, there is pain in the back or shoulders, pain in the extremities, such as arms or legs, along with a sensation of heat or air, as described by some patients claiming it feels like something is flying within them. Secondly, there is discomfort in the liver and just below the stomach. Third, there is pain in the head, often accompanied by madness. Fourth, there is distress in the heart. The heat or air felt in the outermost and extremities is simply the spirits gathering at the initial encounter with the bad air, defending against its infection and fleeing from place to place for their survival. But eventually, once infected, they cause pain where they are trapped, which is usually in the arms or legs (the furthermost areas of their refuge) or in the back or shoulders, initially trying to act bravely as good soldiers before allowing their enemy to advance further into their domain. The other pains occur in those previously mentioned areas and are more severe because the spirits there are most abundant, as if in their source, where the infection always seeks to go. From the liver, near the stomach, brain, and heart arise all three kinds of spirits that govern our bodies, originating from there. But from the heart come the life-sustaining spirits. When these are corrupted by the bad air in bodies susceptible to it, the heart becomes oppressed. This leads to a remarkable heaviness (the fifth symptom of this disease) and an unquenchable desire to sleep, with the senses feeling as if they are bound or closed off, leaving the body feeling heavy, lifeless, and dull. Lastly, there’s a brief duration, a defining sign that the disease resides in the spirits, as evidenced by the ephemeral nature described by Galen, which lasts only one natural day because it is comprised of the spirits. Just as fire quickly ignites and extinguishes in dry straw, so too does heat in the spirits—whether from simple imbalance or from infection and decay—quickly flare up and fade away, especially due to its intensity, which consumes the lighter matter without lingering, unlike other diseases rooted in humors, where once a fire is kindled, it is not so easily extinguished, much like dry wood or fat coal from the sea. This can be illustrated through the example of the plague, which, being based in bad humors, can linger from four to fourteen days, differing from this because, despite being similar in infection. Thus, in one brief effort, I have outlined what this disease is, what it consists of, how it manifests and differs from the Plague, and its specific signs and symptoms. Without these signs, if anyone sweats, I do not consider it a sweat caused by this sickness but rather due to fear, heat of the season, too many clothes, excessive exercise, emotion, overeating, or, at worst, due to a minor infectious cause, and less vulnerability of the body to this illness. Therefore, although the body was not entirely free of matter, it sweated when the infection occurred; however, since the matter was not significant, it could not be dangerous or painful like in others with more substantial causes.

The causes.—Hetherto I haue shewed the beginning, name, nature, & signes of this disease: nowe I will declare the causes, which be ij.: infectiō, & impure spirites in bodies corrupt by repletiō. Infection, by thaire receiuing euel qualities, distēpring not only ye hete, but the hole substāce therof, in putrifieng thesame, and that generally ij. waies. By the time of the yere vnnatural, & by the nature & site of the soile & region—wherunto maye be put the particular accidentes of this same. By the time of the yeare vnnaturall, as if winter be hot & drie, somer hot and moist: (a fit time for sweates) the spring colde and drye, the fall hot & moist. To this mai be ioyned the euel disposition by constellation, whiche hath a great power & dominion in al erthly thinges. By the site & nature of the soile & regiō, many wayes. First &364 specially by euel mistes & exhalatiōs drawen out of the grounde by the sūne in the heate of the yeare, as chanced amōg the Grekes in the siege of Troy, wherby died firste dogges & mules, after, mē in great numbre: & here also in Englād in this m.d.lj. yeare, the cause of this pestilent sweate, but of dyuers nature. Whiche miste in the countrie wher it began, was sene flie frō toune to toune, with suche a stincke in morninges & eueninges, that mē could scarcely abide it. Thē by dampes out of the earth, as out of Galenes Barathrū, or the poetes auernū, or aornū, the dampes wherof be such, that thei kil ye birdes fliēg ouer them. Of like dampes, I heard in the north coūtry in cole pits, wherby the laboring mē be straight killed, except before the houre of coming therof (which thei know by ye flame of their cādle) thei auoid the groūd. Thirdly by putrefactiō or rot in groūdes aftre great flouddes, in carions, & in dead men. After great fluddes, as happened in ye time of Gallien thēperor at rome, in Achaia & Libia, wher the seas sodeinly did ouerflow ye cities nigh to yt same. And in the xi. yeare of Pelagius, when al the flouddes throughe al Italye didde rage, but chieflye Tibris at Rome, whiche in many places was as highe as the walles of the citie.

The causes.—So far, I've covered the beginning, name, nature, and signs of this disease: now I will explain the causes, which are two: infection and harmful spirits in bodies corrupted by excess. Infection, through the introduction of negative qualities, disrupts not only the heat but the entire substance, causing it to putrefy, and this occurs generally in two ways. One is through the unnatural changes of the year, and the other is from the nature and location of the soil and region—which can also include specific incidents related to these. The unnatural changes of the year occur when winter is hot and dry, summer is hot and humid (a suitable time for sweats), spring is cold and dry, and autumn is hot and humid. Additionally, bad influences by constellation have significant power over all earthly matters. Regarding the soil and region's characteristics, there are many factors. Firstly and especially, harmful mists and exhalations drawn from the ground by the sun during the hot part of the year, as happened among the Greeks during the siege of Troy, where dogs and mules initially died, followed by many men in large numbers; and here in England in this year 1551, this was also the cause of the deadly sweat, though of a different nature. The mist in the area where it started was seen to fly from town to town, with such a stench in the mornings and evenings that people could barely tolerate it. Then, there are the vapors rising from the earth, like those from Galen's Barathrum, or the poets' auernum, or aornum, whose vapors are so deadly that they kill the birds flying over them. I've heard of similar vapors in the northern country in coal pits, where laborers are immediately killed unless they leave the ground before the time they know to exit (which they can tell by the flame of their candle). Thirdly, there's putrefaction or decay in the land after significant floods, in carrion, and in dead bodies. Following major floods, as occurred during the time of the Emperor Gallienus in Rome, in Achaia and Libya, where the seas suddenly overflowed the cities nearby. And in the eleventh year of Pelagius, when all the floods throughout Italy raged, especially the Tiber in Rome, which in many places rose as high as the city walls.

In cariōs or dead bodies, as fortuned here in Englande vpon the sea banckes in the tyme of King Alured, or Alfrede; (as some Chroniclers write) but in the time of king Ethelred after Sabellicus, by occasion of drowned Locustes cast vp by the Sea, which by a wynde were driuen oute of Fraunce thether. This locust is a flie in bignes of a mānes thumbe, in colour broune, in shape somewhat like a greshopper, hauing vi. fiete, so many wynges, two tiethe, & an hedde like a horse, and therfore called in Italy Caualleto, where ouer ye city of Padoa, in the yeare m.d.xiij. (as I remembre,) I, with manye more did see a swarme of theim, whose passage ouer the citie, did laste two hours, in breadth inestimable to euery man there. Here by example to note infection by deadde menne in Warres, either in rotting aboue the ground, as chaunced in Athenes by theim of Ethiopia, or els in beyng buried ouerly as happened at Bulloigne, in the yere M.D.xlv. the yeare aftre king Henrye theight had conquered the same, or by long continuance of an hoste in one place, it is more playne by dayly experience, then it neadeth to be shewed. Therefore I wil now go to the fourth especial cause of infectiō, the pent aier, breaking out of the ground in yearthquakes, as chaunced at Uenice in the first yeare of Andrea Dandulo, then Duke, the xxiiij. day of Januarye, and xx. hour after their computacion. By which infectiō mani died, & many were borne before their time. The v. cause is close, & vnstirred aire, & therfore putrified or corrupt, out of old welles, holes in ye groūd made for grain, wherof many I did se in & about Pesaro in Italy, by openīg thē aftre a great space, as both those coūtrimē do cōfesse, & 365also by exāple is declared, for ye manye in openīg thē vnwarely be killed. Out of caues, & tōbes also, as chaūced first in the country of Babilonia, proceding aftre into Grece, and so to Rome, by occasion that ye souldiers of themperour Marcus Antoninus, vpon hope of money, brake up a golden coffine of Auidius Cassius, spiēg a litle hole therin, in the tēple of Apollo in Seleucia, as Ammianus Marcellinus writeth. To these mai be ioyned the particular causes of infectiō, which I cal the accidentes of the place, augmenting thesame. As nigh to dwelling places, merishe & muddy groundes, puddles or donghilles, sinkes or canales, easing places or carions, deadde ditches or rotten groundes, close aier in houses or ualleis, with suche like. Thus muche for the firste cause.

In corpses or dead bodies, as happened here in England on the sea coasts during the time of King Alfred; (as some chroniclers note) but during King Ethelred's time after Sabellicus, due to drowned locusts washed up by the sea, which were driven over from France by wind. This locust is about the size of a man's thumb, brown in color, and somewhat resembles a grasshopper, having six legs, as many wings, two teeth, and a head like a horse, and that's why it's called in Italy Caualleto. Over the city of Padoa in the year 1513 (as I remember), many saw a swarm of them whose passage over the city lasted two hours and was unmeasurable in width to everyone there. Here, as an example, we can note the infection caused by dead men in wars, either from decomposing above ground, as happened in Athens with the Ethiopians, or being buried incorrectly as occurred at Boulogne in the year 1545, the year after King Henry VIII had conquered it. It’s clear from daily experience that long-standing armies in one place contribute to this. Therefore, I will now move to the fourth main cause of infection, the pent-up air, which breaks out of the ground during earthquakes, like what happened in Venice in the first year of Andrea Dandulo, then Duke, on January 24th, at 20 hours after their calculations. From this infection, many died, and many were born prematurely. The fifth cause is stagnant and undisturbed air, which becomes putrid or corrupt, coming from old wells, holes in the ground made for grains, which I saw many of in and around Pesaro in Italy after they were opened long after, as both regions admit, and 365 also by example is shown, for many were carelessly killed when they opened them. From caves and tombs as well, which first happened in the land of Babilonia, later spreading to Greece and then to Rome, because the soldiers of Emperor Marcus Antoninus, hoping for money, broke open a golden coffin of Auidius Cassius, by making a small hole in it, in the temple of Apollo in Seleucia, as Ammianus Marcellinus writes. To these, we can add the particular causes of infection, which I call the accidents of the place that exacerbate it. For example, being near dwelling places, marshy and muddy grounds, puddles or dung hills, sinks or drains, places for waste, dead ditches or rotten grounds, stagnant air in houses or valleys, and similar conditions. Thus much for the first cause.

The second cause of this Englyshe Ephemera, I said were thimpure spirites in bodies corupt by repletiō. Repletion I cal here, abundance of humores euel & maliciouse, from long time by litle & litle gathered by euel diete, remaining in the bodye, coming either by to moche meate, or by euel meate in qualitie, as infected frutes, meates of euel iuse or nutrimēt; or both ioyntly. To such spirites when the aire infectiue cometh cōsonant, thē be thei distēpered, corrupted, sore handled; & oppressed, thē nature is forced, & the disease engendred. But while I doe declare these impure spirites to be one cause, I must remoue your myndes frō spirites to humours, for that the spirites be fedde of the finest partes therof, & aftre bringe you againe to spirites where I toke you. And forsomuche as I haue not yet forgotten to whome I write, in this declaration I will leaue a part al learned & subtil reasōs, as here void & vnmiete, & only vse suche as be most euident to whom I write, & easiest to be vnderstanden of the same: and at ones therwith shew also why it haūteth vs English men more thē other nations. Therfore I passe ouer the vngētle sauoure or smell of the sweate, grosenes, colour, and other qualities of the same, the quantitie, the daunger in stopping, the maner in coming furthe redily, or hardly, hot or cold, the notes in the excremētes, the state longer or sorer, with suche others, which mai be tokēs of corrupt humours & spirites, & onli wil stād upō iii. reasōs declaring ye same swet by gret repletiō to be in vs not otherwise for al the euel aire apt to this disease, more thē other natiōs. For as hereaftre I wil shew, & Galē cōfirmeth, our bodies cā not suffre any thīg or hurt by corrupt & infectiue causes, except ther be in thē a certeī mater prepared apt & like to receiue it, els if one were sick, al shuld be sick, if in this countri, in al coūtres wher the infection came, which thīg we se doth not chāce. For touching the first reasō, we se this sweting sicknes or pestilēt Ephemera, to be oft in Englād, but neuer entreth Scotland, (except the borders) albeit thei both be ioinctly within the cōpas of on sea. The same begining here, hath assailed Brabant & the costes nigh to it, but neuer, passed Germany, where ones it was in like faciō as here, with great366 mortalitie, in the yere m.d.xxix. Cause wherof none other there is naturall, then the euell diet of these thre contries whiche destroy more meates and drynckes withoute al ordre, cōueniēt time, reasō, or necessite, thē either Scotlande, or all other countries vnder the sunne, to the greate annoiance of their owne bodies and wittes, hinderance of theim which have nede, and great dearth and scarcitie in their cōmon welthes. Wherfore if Esculapius the inuentour of phisike, ye sauer of mē from death, and restorer to life, should returne again īto this world, he could not saue these sortes of men, hauing so moche sweatyng stuffe, so many euill humoures laid vp in store, frō this displeasante, feareful, & pestilent disease: except thei would learne a new lesson, & folowe a new trade. For other wise, neither the auoidyng of this countrie (the seconde reason) nor fleyng into others, (a commune refuge in other diseases) wyll preserue vs Englishe men, as in this laste sweate is by experience well proued in Cales, Antwerpe, and other places of Brabant, wher only our contrimen ware sicke, & none others, except one or ii. others of thenglishe diete, which is also to be noted. The cause hereof natural is onely this, that they caried ouer with thē, & by lyke diete ther incresed that whiche was the cause of their disease. Wherefore lette vs asserteine our selues, that in what soeuer contrie lyke cause and matter is, there commyng like aier and cause efficient, wil make lyke effecte and disease in persōs of agreable complexions, age, and diete, if the tyme also doe serue to these same, and in none others. These I putte, for that the tyme of the yere hote, makethe moche to the malice of the disease, in openynge the pores of the body, lettynge in the euill aier, resoluynge the humores and makynge them flowable, and disposing therfore the spirites accordyngly, besyde, that (as I shewed in the first cause of this pestilente sweate) it stirreth and draweth out of the erthe euill exhalations and mistes, to thinfection of the aier and displeasure of vs. Diet I put, for that they of the contrarie diete be not troubled with it at all. Age and complexion, for this, that although it spareth nō age of bothe kyndes, nor no complexion but some it touchethe, yet for the most parte (wherby rules and reasones be alwayes to be made) it vexed theim of the middle age, beste luste, and theim not moch vnder that, and of complexions hote & moiste, as fitteste by their naughty & moche subtiltie of blode to fede the spirites: or nigh and lyke to thesame in some one of the qualities, as cholerike in hete, phlegmatike in moister, excepte thother their qualities, as drinesse in cholerike, & cold in phlegmatike, by great dominion ouer thother, did lette. For the clene contrarie complexiōs to the infected aier, alwaies remaine helthful, saulfe and better then tofore, the corrupte and infected aier notwithstandyng. Therfore cold and drie persones either it touched not at all, or very fewe, and that wyth no danger: such I say as beside their complexion, (whiche367 is so harde to finde in any man exacte and simple, as exacte helthes) were annoied with some corrupt humoures & spirites, and therfore mete by so moch to receiue it, & that by good reasō. For nothing can naturally haue power to do ought against any thing, excepte the same haue in it selfe a disposicion by like qualities to receiue it. As the cause in the fote cānot trouble the flanke and leue the knee (the mean betwixte) except there were a greater consent and likenes of nature in sufferance (whiche we call sympathian) betwixte those then thother. Nor fire refusynge stones, canne burne hardes, strawe, stickes and charcole, oile, waxe, fatte, and seacole, except these same first of al wer apte, and by conuenient qualities disposed to be enflamed and burned. Nor any man goeth about to burne water, because the qualities thereof be contrary, and the body vndisposed to the like of fire. By whiche reason it may also be perceiued, that ye venemouse qualitie of this corrupt aire is hote and moiste, for it redily enfectethe the lyke complexions, and those nigh vnto theim, and the contrary not at all, or hardly: & easely doth putrify, as doe the Southe wyndes. Therfore next vnto those colde and drie cōplexions, olde men escaped free, as like to theim by age: and children, as voide of replecion consumed by their great hete, and therefore alwaies redy to eate. But in this disease the subtile humour euill and abundant in full bodies fedyng ye spirites, is more to be noted then the humour complexional, whiche notwithstanding, as an helper or hinderer to ye same, is not to be neglected. For els it should be in all contries and persones indifferently, wher all complexiones be. The thirde and laste reason is, yt they which had thys sweat sore with perille or death, were either men of welthe, ease, & welfare, or of the poorer sorte such as wer idle persones, good ale drinkers, and Tauerne haunters. For these, by ye great welfare of the one sorte, and large drinkyng of thother, heped vp in their bodies moche euill matter: by their ease and idlenes, coulde not waste and consume it. A comfirmacion of this is, that the laborouse and thinne dieted people, either had it not, because they dyd eate but litle to make the matter: or with no greate grefe and danger, because they laboured out moche thereof. Wherefore vpon small cause, necessarily must folowe a smal effecte. All these reasones go to this ende, that persones of all contries of moderate and good diete, escape thys Englishe Ephemera, and those be onely vexed therewith, whiche be of immoderate and euill diete. But why? for the euill humores and corrupte aier alone? No, for thē the pestilence and not the swet should rise. For what then? For ye impure spirites corrupte in theim selues and by the infectiue aier. Why so? for that of impure and corrupte humores, whether thei be blode or others, can rise none other then impure spirites. For euery thynge is suche as that whereof it commeth. Now, that of the beste and fineste of the blode, yea in corrupte bodies (whyche beste is nought) these spirites be ingendred and fedde, I before expressed. Therfor who wyl haue them pure and cleane,368 and him selfe free from sweat, muste kepe a pure and cleane diete, and then he shalbe sure.

The second reason for this English Ephemera, as I mentioned, is the impure spirits in bodies corrupted by excess. By excess, I mean an abundance of harmful and malicious fluids that accumulate over time due to a poor diet, remaining in the body, either from too much food or bad quality food, such as contaminated fruits and meats or both together. When such spirits encounter infectious air, they become disturbed, corrupted, severely affected, and oppressed. Nature is then forced into illness. While I identify these impure spirits as a cause, I must shift your focus from spirits to fluids, since the spirits are nourished by the finest parts of these fluids before returning to the spirits I started with. And since I have not forgotten my audience, in this explanation, I will set aside learned and subtle reasons as irrelevant and instead focus on those most evident and easy to understand for you: and at the same time, I will show why this affects us English more than other nations. Thus, I will skip over the unpleasant odor or smell of sweat, the coarseness, color, and other qualities, the quantity, the danger of blockage, the manner of expulsion being easy or difficult, hot or cold, the characteristics in the excretions, the duration or severity, and such others that may be signs of corrupt fluids and spirits, and only focus on three reasons that explain why this excessive sweat is found in us and not otherwise, despite the bad air conducive to this disease affecting us more than other nations. For, as I will show later, and as Galen confirms, our bodies cannot suffer any harm due to corrupt and infectious causes unless there is a certain material in them prepared to receive it; otherwise, if one were sick, all should be sick in this country, and in all countries from which the infection comes, which we see does not happen. Regarding the first reason, we see this sweating sickness or pestilent Ephemera occurring often in England, but it never enters Scotland (except the borders), even though both are jointly within the confines of one sea. The same origin here has attacked Brabant and the nearby coast but has never passed Germany, where at one time it was prevalent, similar to here, with high mortality in the year 1529. The only natural cause for this is the poor diet in these three countries, which waste more food and drinks without any order, appropriate timing, reason, or necessity than in Scotland or all other countries under the sun, to the great detriment of their own bodies and minds, hindering those in need, and causing significant drought and scarcity in their commonwealths. Therefore, if Esculapius, the inventor of medicine, the savior of men from death and restorer to life, were to return to this world, he could not save these types of people, who have so much accumulated sweat and so many bad fluids stored up, from this unpleasant, fearful, and pestilent disease, unless they learned a new lesson and followed a new practice. Otherwise, neither leaving this country (the second reason) nor fleeing to others (a common refuge in other illnesses) will save us English, as has been well-proven in experience during this last sweating sickness in Calais, Antwerp, and other places in Brabant, where only our countrymen were sick, and no others, except for one or two others with an English diet, which is also noteworthy. The natural cause for this is solely that they carried over with them, and by like diet, they increased that which was the cause of their disease. Therefore, let us assure ourselves that in any country with a like cause and material, where the air and effective cause is similar, will produce a like effect and disease in individuals of compatible complexions, age, and diet, if the timing also suits these same conditions, and in none others. I suggest these reasons because the hot time of year greatly contributes to the malice of the disease by opening the pores of the body, allowing the bad air to enter, dissolving the fluids, making them flowable, and consequently affecting the spirits accordingly. Additionally, as I stated in the first cause of this pestilent sweat, it stirs and draws out bad exhalations and mists from the earth, infecting the air and causing us distress. I mention diet because those on opposing diets are not troubled by it at all. Age and complexion enter into it because, although it spares none of either kind or any complexion, it tends to affect some more than others; yet, for the most part (from which rules and reasoning are always drawn), it troubled those of middle age, the most vigorous, and those slightly younger, and those with hot and moist complexions, as they are more likely due to their troubled and subtle blood to feed the spirits. Or those similar in some quality, such as choleric in heat, phlegmatic in moisture, unless the others' qualities, such as dryness in choleric and coldness in phlegmatic, exercised great dominance over the others. For persons with opposite complexions to the infected air remain healthy, safe, and better than before, regardless of the corrupt and infected air. Therefore, cold and dry individuals are either not affected at all or very few, and that with no danger: such as I describe who, besides their complexion (which is so hard to find in any man precisely and purely, as are exact healths), were troubled with some corrupt fluids and spirits, and are thus more susceptible to it, and this is reasonable. For nothing can naturally have the power to do anything against anything unless it has within itself a disposition by similar qualities to receive it. Just as a problem in the foot cannot trouble the flank and leave the knee (the middle point) unless there is a greater consent and likeness of nature in suffering (which we call sympathy) between those than the others. Nor can fire refusing stones burn hard objects, straw, sticks, charcoal, oil, wax, fat, and coal, unless these are first suitable and disposed by appropriate qualities to be inflamed and burned. Nor does anyone try to burn water because its qualities are contrary, and the body is unprepared for the likeness of fire. By this reasoning, it can also be observed that the poisonous quality of this corrupt air is hot and moist as it readily infects like complexions and those close to them, while the opposite is not affected at all or with difficulty: and it easily spoils, as do the southern winds. Therefore, next to those cold and dry complexions, old men escaped unharmed, as they are similar in age: and children, being devoid of excess, consumed by their high heat and therefore always ready to eat. But in this disease, the subtle, harmful fluid abundant in full bodies feeding the spirits is more noteworthy than the complexional fluid, which nonetheless, as a helper or hinderer to the same, is not to be overlooked. For otherwise, it would manifest in all countries and people equally, where all complexions are found. The third and final reason is that those who suffered from this sweat with peril or death were either wealthy, comfortable, and well-off individuals or poorer ones, such as idle people, heavy drinkers, and tavern dwellers. For these, by the great comfort of one class and the excessive drinking of the other, accumulated a lot of bad matter in their bodies. Due to their ease and idleness, they could not waste or burn it off. A confirmation of this is that the laborious and lightly fed people either did not have it at all because they eat little to create the matter, or they experienced no significant grief or danger, as they worked off much of it. Therefore, on minor causes, small effects necessarily follow. All these reasons point to this conclusion: that people from all countries with moderate and good diets escape this English Ephemera, and only those with immoderate and poor diets are troubled by it. But why? Is it just because of the bad fluids and corrupt air? No, for then the plague and not the sweat should arise. So what then? For the impure spirits corrupted within them by the infectious air. Why is that? Because from impure and corrupt fluids, whether they be blood or others, can arise nothing but impure spirits. For everything is of the nature of that from which it comes. Now, that the best and finest of the blood, even in corrupt bodies (which best is nothing), these spirits are generated and nourished, I have previously expressed. Therefore, whoever wants them pure and clean, and themselves free from sweat, must maintain a pure and clean diet, and then they will be sure.

The preseruacion.—Infection by the aier, and impure spirites by repletion thus founde and declared to be the causes of this pestilente sweate or Englishe ephemera, lette vs nowe see howe we maye preserue our selues from it, and howe it may be remedied, if it chaunce, wyth lesse mortalitie. I wyll begynne wyth preseruation. That most of all dothe stande in auoidyng the causes to come of the disease, the thinges helping forward the same, and remouyng that whiche is alredy had & gotten. Al be done by the good order of thynges perteynyng to the state of the body. Therfore I will begin with diete where I lefte, & then go furth with aier where I beganne in treatyng the causes, and declare the waie to auoide infection, and so furthe to the reste in order. Who that lustethe to lyue in quiete suretie, out of the sodaine danger of this Englishe ephemera, he aboue all thynges, of litle and good muste eate & spare not, the laste parte wherof wyl please well (I doubt not) vs Englishe men: the firste I thinke neuer a deale. Yet it must please theim that entende to lyue without the reche of this disease. So doyng, they shall easely escape it. For of that is good, can be engendred no euill: of that is litle, can be gathered no great store. Therfore helthful must he nedes be and free from this disease, that vsethe this kinde of liuynge and maner in dietynge. An example hereof may the wise man Socrates be, which by this sorte of diete escaped a sore pestilence in Athenes, neuer fleynge ne kepyng close him selfe from the same. Truly who will lyue accordynge to nature and not to lust, may with this diete be well contented. For nature is pleased with a litle, nor seketh other then that the mind voide of cares and feares may be in quiete merily, and the body voide of grefe, maye be in life swetly, as Lucretius writeth. Here at large to ronne out vntill my breth wer spent, as vpon a common place, against ye intemperāce or excessiue diete of Englande, thincommodities & displeasures of the same many waies: and contrarie, in commēdation of meane diete and temperance (called of Plato sophrosyne, for that it cōserneth wisdome) and the thousande commodities therof, both for helthe, welthe, witte, and longe life, well I might, & lose my laboure: such be our Englishe facions rather then reasones. But for that I purpose neither to wright a longe work but a shorte counseill, nor to wery the reders with that they luste not to here, I will lette that passe, and moue thē that desire further to knowe my mynde therin, to remember that I sayd before, of litle & good eate and spare not, wherby they shall easely perceiue my meanyng. I therefore go furth with my diete, wherin my counseill is, that the meates be helthfull, and holsomly kylled, swetly saued, and wel prepared in rostyng, sethyng, baking, & so furth. The bred, of swet corne, well leuened, and so baked. The drinke of swete malte and good water kyndly brued,369 without other drosse nowe a daies vsed. No wine in all the tyme of sweatyng, excepte to suche whose sickenes require it for medicin, for fere of inflamynge & openynge, nor except ye halfe be wel soden water. In other tymes, old, pure, & smal. Wishīg for the better executiō hereof & ouersight of good and helthsome victalles, ther wer appointed certein masters of helth in euery citie and toune, as there is in Italie, whiche for the good order in all thynges, maye be in al places an example. The meates I would to be veale, muttone, kidde, olde lambe, chikyn, capone, henne, cocke, pertriche, phesane, felfare, smal birdes, pigeon, yong pecockes, whose fleshe by a certeine natural & secrete propertie neuer putrefie, as hath bene proued. Conies, porke of meane age, neither fatte nor leane, the skynne takē awaye, roste, & eatē colde: Tartes of prunes, gelies of veale & capone. Yong befe in this case a litle poudered is not to be dispraised, nor new egges & good milke. Butter in a mornyng with sage and rewe fastynge in the sweatynge tyme, is a good preseruatiue, beside that it nourisheth. Crabbes, crauesses, picrel, perche, ruffe, gogion, lampreis out of grauelly riuers, smeltes, dace, barbell, gornerd, whityng, soles, flunders, plaice, millers thumbes, minues, wt such others, sodde in water & vinegre wt rosemary, time, sage, & hole maces, & serued hote. Yea swete salte fishe and linge, for the saltes sake wastynge ye humores therof, which in many freshe fishes remaine, maye be allowed well watered to thē that haue none other, & wel lyke it. Nor all fishes, no more then al fleshes be so euil as they be takē for: as is wel declared in physik, & approued by the olde and wise romaines moche in their fisshes, lusty chartusianes neuer in fleshes, & helthful poore people more in fishe then fleshe. But we are nowe a daies so vnwisely fine, and womanly delicate, that we may in no wise touch a fisshe. The olde manly hardnes, stoute courage, & peinfulnes of Englande is vtterly driuen awaye, in the stede wherof, men now a daies receive womanlines, & become nice, not able to withstande a blaste of wynde, or resiste a poore fishe. And children be so brought vp, that if they be not all daie by the fire with a toste and butire, and in their furres, they be streight sicke.

The preservation.—Infection from the air and impurities in the environment have been identified as the causes of this pestilent sweat or English ephemera. Now, let’s explore how we can protect ourselves from it and how it can be treated, if it occurs, with less risk of mortality. I will start with preservation. The most important thing is to avoid the causes of the disease, anything that can worsen it, and to remove what is already present. This can all be accomplished by maintaining a proper regimen concerning the health of the body. Therefore, I will begin with diet, where I previously left off, then continue with the air, as I started discussing the causes, and elaborate on how to avoid infection, and then proceed in order to the rest. Anyone who wants to live in safety and peace, free from the sudden danger of this English ephemera, must, above all, eat little and well, the latter of which I have no doubt will please us Englishmen: the former, I think, will not. Yet, it must be appealing to those who aim to live without falling victim to this disease. By doing so, they will easily escape it. For from what is good, no evil can arise; from what is little, no great store can be gathered. Therefore, he who lives according to this type of diet must necessarily be healthy and free from this disease. A wise example of this can be Socrates, who escaped a severe pestilence in Athens by adhering to this kind of diet, never fleeing or isolating himself from it. Truly, those who wish to live according to nature and not by desire may find this diet thoroughly satisfying. For nature is content with little and seeks nothing more than a mind free of worries and fears to be joyful and a body free of discomfort to live sweetly, as Lucretius writes. Here, I could go on until my breath runs out, discussing the excesses and drawbacks of England's indulgent and excessive diet, and the virtues of moderate eating and temperance (called by Plato sophrosyne, as it pertains to wisdom) and the countless benefits it provides for health, wealth, intellect, and longevity, but I would likely lose my effort: such are our English ways rather than rationalities. But since I do not aim to write a lengthy work but rather a short counsel, nor do I want to bore the readers with what they do not wish to hear, I will let that pass and direct those who wish to delve deeper into my thoughts to remember that I previously mentioned eating little and well, which will help them easily understand my meaning. Therefore, I continue with my recommendations for diet, where my advice is that foods should be wholesome, well cooked, sweetly flavored, and properly prepared through roasting, boiling, baking, and so forth. The bread should be made from sweet corn, well-leavened, and properly baked. The drink should be sweet malt and good water, brewed naturally, without other impurities commonly used nowadays. No wine during sweating, except for those whose sickness requires it for medicinal reasons, to avoid inflammation and opening, nor except that half is well-boiled water. At other times, old, pure, and light wine is preferable. To ensure the better implementation of this and oversight of good and healthy provisions, certain health masters should be appointed in every city and town, as they are in Italy, which can serve as an example for good order in all things. The meats I would recommend are veal, mutton, kid, old lamb, chicken, capon, hen, cock, partridge, pheasant, quail, small birds, pigeon, young peacocks, whose flesh has a unique natural property that prevents it from spoiling, as it has been proven. Rabbits, pork of moderate age, neither fat nor lean, with the skin removed, roasted, and eaten cold: tarts of prunes, jellies of veal and capon. Young beef in this case, slightly salted, is not to be dismissed, nor are new eggs and good milk. Butter in the morning with sage and rue while fasting during the sweating time is a good preservative, aside from nourishing. Crabs, crawfish, perch, ruffe, mullet, lampreys from gravelly rivers, smelts, dace, barbel, whiting, soles, flounders, plaice, miller's thumbs, minnows, and such, should be boiled in water and vinegar with rosemary, thyme, sage, and whole mace, and served hot. Yes, sweet salted fish and eel, due to losing their humors through salting, which many fresh fish retain, can be allowed well watered for those who have no other, and will be well accepted. Nor are all fish, just as not all meats, as bad as they are considered: as is well demonstrated in medicine and confirmed by ancient wise Romans, who often preferred fish over meat for their health, while robust Carthusian monks never relied on meat, and poor people benefitted more from fish than flesh. But nowadays, we are so unwisely refined and overly delicate that we cannot touch fish at all. The old manly strength, steadfast courage, and endurance of England have completely faded away, and instead, people today have adopted femininity and become delicate, unable to withstand a blast of wind or resist a common fish. Children are raised in such a way that if they are not by the fire all day with toast and butter, wrapped in their furs, they quickly fall ill.

Sauces to metes I appoint firste aboue all thynges good appetite, and next Oliues, capers, iuse of lemones, Barberies, Pomegranetes, Orenges and Sorel, veriuse, & vineigre, iuse of vnripe Grapes, thepes or Goseberies. After mete, quinces, or marmalade, Pomegranates, Orenges sliced eaten with Suger, Succate of the pilles or barkes therof, and of pomecitres, olde apples and peres, Prunes, Reisons, Dates & Nuttes. Figges also, so they be taken before diner, els no frutes of that yere, nor rawe herbes or rotes in sallattes, for that in suche times they be suspected to be partakers also of the enfected aire.

I suggest starting with a good appetite above all else, then move on to olives, capers, lemon juice, barberries, pomegranates, oranges, and sorrel, along with various spices and vinegar, and juice from unripe grapes, currants, or gooseberries. After the meal, have quinces or marmalade, pomegranates, sliced oranges with sugar, candied peels, and varieties of apples and pears, prunes, raisins, dates, and nuts. Figs should also be eaten before dinner; otherwise, avoid fruits from that year, as well as raw herbs or roots in salads, since they might be affected by the contaminated air during such times.

Of aire so much I haue spoken before, as apperteinethe to the declaration of enfection therby. Nowe I wyl aduise and counseill howe to370 kepe the same pure, for somoche as may be, or lesse enfected, and correcte the same corrupte. The first is done in takynge a way ye causes of enfectiō. The seconde, by doynge in all pointes the contrary thereto. Take awaye the causes we maye, in damnyng diches, auoidynge cariōs, lettyng in open aire, shunning suche euil mistes as before I spake of, not openynge or sturrynge euill brethynge places, landynge muddy and rottē groundes, burieng dede bodyes, kepyng canelles cleane, sinkes & easyng places sweat, remouynge dongehilles, boxe and euil sauouryng thynges, enhabitynge high & open places, close towarde the sowthe, shutte toward the winde, as reason wil & thexperience of M. varro in the pestilēce at Corcyra confirmethe. Correcte in doyng the contrary we shall, in dryenge the moiste with fyres, either in houses or chambers, or on that side the cities, townes, & houses, that lieth toward the infection and wynde commyng together, chefely in mornynges & eueninges, either by burnyng the stubble in the felde, or windfallynges in the woodes, or other wise at pleasure. By which policie skilful Acron deliuered Athenes in Gretia, and diuine Hippocrates abderā in Thratia frō ye pestilēce, & preserued frō the same other the cities in Grece, at diuerse times cōyng with the wynde frō æethiopia, illyria & pŒonia, by putting to the fires wel smelling garlādes, floures & odoures, as Galene and Soranus write. Of like pollicie for purgyng the aier were the bonfires made (as I suppose) frō long time hetherto vsed in ye middes of sommer, and not onely for vigiles. In cōfortyng the spirites also, and by alterynge the aier with swete odoures of roses, swet perfumes of the same, rosemary leaues, baies, and white sanders cutte, afewe cloues steped in rose water and vinegre rosate, the infection shalbe lesse noious. With the same you maye also make you a swete house in castynge it abrode therin, if firste by auoidynge the russhes and duste, you make the house clene. Haue alwaies in your handcercher for your nose and mouth, bothe with in your house and without, either the perfume before saide, or vinegre rosate: and in your mouth a pece either of setwel, or of the rote of enula campana wel steped before in vinegre rosate, a mace, or berie of Juniper. In wante of suche perfumes as is beforesaide, take of mirrhe & drie rose leues of eche a lyke quantite, with a little franke encense, for the like purpose, and caste it vpon the coles: or burne Juniper & their beries. And for so moche as clenelines is a great help to helthe, mine aduise is, that all your clothes be swete smellynge and clene, and that you wasshe your handes and face not in warme water, but with rose water and vinegre rosate colde, or elles with the faire water and vinegre wherein the pilles or barkes of orenges and pomegranates are sodden: or the pilles of pomecitres & sorel is boiled: for so you shalle close the pores ayenst the ayre, that it redily entre not, and cole and tempre those partes so wasshed, accordynge to the right entente in curynge this disease. For in al the discurse, preseruatiō, 371and cure of thys disease, the chefe marke & purpose is, to minister suche thynges as of their nature haue the facultie by colyng dryenge and closyng, to resiste putrefaction, strength and defende the spirites, comforte the harte, and kepe all the body ayenst the displeasure of the corrupte aire. Wherfor it shal be wel done, if you take of this cōposition folowyng euery mornyng the weight of ij. d. in vi. sponefulles of water or iuleppe of Sorel, & cast it vpon your meate as pepper. ℞ seīs citri. acetos. ros. rub. sādal. citrin. ān. ʒ i boli armeni oriētal. ʒ i. s, terr. sigil. ʒ s, margarit. ʒ i, fol. auri puri. no. iiij, misce. & f. pul. diuidatur ad pōd. ʒ s. Or in the stede of this, take fasting the quantitie of a small bene of Mithridatum or Uenice triacle in a sponeful of Sorel, or Scabious water, or by the selfe alone. And in goyng abrode, haue in youre hande either an handekercher with vinegre and rose water, or a litle muske balle of nutmegges, maces, cloues, saffrō, & cinamome, of eche the weight of ij. d. finely beatē; of mastike the weight of ij. d. ob. of storax, v. d. of ladane x. d. of Ambre grise vi. graines, of Muske iii. graines dissolued in ryght Muscadel: temper al together, & make a balle. In want of Mithridatum or suche other as I haue before mencioned, vse dayly the Sirupes of Pomegranates, Lemones, and Sorell, of eche half an vnce, with asmuche of the watres of Tormentille, Sorell, and Dragones, fasting in the morning, and one houre before supper. A toste in vinegre or veriuse of Grapes, with a litle poulder of Cinamome and Settewelle caste vppon it. Or two figges with one nutte carnelle, and tenne leaues of rue in eche, and a litle salt. Or boutire, rue, and sage, with breade in a morning eaten nexte your harte, be as good preseruatiues, as theie be easye to be hadde. These preseruatiues I here appoincte the more willingly among many others further to be fetched, because these maye easelier be hadde, as at hande in niede, which now to finde is my most endeuour, as moste fruictfulle to whome I write. And this to be done I counsaille in the sickenesse tyme, when firste you heare it to be comming and begonne, but not in the fitte. Alwayes remembryng, not to go out fastinge. For as Cornelius Celsus wrytethe, Uenime or infection taketh holde muche soner in a bodye yet fasting, then in the same not fastinge. Yet this is not so to be vnderstande, that in the mornynge we shal streight as our clothes be on, stuffe our bellies as fulle as Englishe menne, (as the Frenche man saieth to our shames,) but to be contente with oure preseruatiues, or with a little meate bothe at breakefaste (if custome and nede so require) dynner and supper. For other wise nature, if the disease shoulde take vs. shoulde haue more a doe againste the full bealy and fearce disease, then it were able to susteyne.

Of air, I have spoken so much before as pertains to the declaration of infection therefrom. Now I will advise and counsel how to370 keep it as pure as possible or less infected, and correct what is corrupted. The first is done by removing the causes of infection. The second, by doing the opposite of those causes. We can eliminate causes by filling in ditches, avoiding carrion, allowing fresh air in, avoiding the bad mists I mentioned before, not opening or stirring foul-smelling places, landing on muddy and rotten grounds, burying dead bodies, keeping canals clean, managing cesspools, moving dung heaps, removing foul-smelling things, living in high and open places, sheltered to the south and closed towards the wind, as reason dictates and the experience of M. Varro during the plague at Corcyra confirms. To correct, we should do the opposite by drying out moisture with fires, either in houses or chambers, or on the side of the cities, towns, and houses facing the infection and incoming wind, especially in the mornings and evenings, either by burning stubble in the fields or fallen trees in the woods, or otherwise as seems fit. With this method, the skilled Acron saved Athens in Greece, and the divine Hippocrates of Abdera in Thrace from the plague, preserving other cities in Greece from the same, during various times coming with the wind from Aethiopia, Illyria, and Paeonia, by adding well-scented garlands, flowers, and perfumes to the fires, as Galene and Soranus write. A similar method for purifying the air is the bonfires that have been used for a long time in the middle of summer, and not only for vigils. By comforting the spirits and changing the air with sweet scents from roses, delightful perfumes of the same, rosemary leaves, bay leaves, and white sandalwood, cut, along with a few cloves soaked in rose water and vinegar, the infection will be less harmful. With these, you can also create a sweet-smelling home by scattering it around if, first, you clean it by avoiding rushes and dust. Always have a handkerchief for your nose and mouth, both inside and outside your house, either with the aforementioned perfume or vinegar rosewater; and keep a piece in your mouth either of sweet flag or the root of enula campana, well-soaked beforehand in vinegar rosewater, a mace, or berry of juniper. In the absence of such perfumes as mentioned above, take equal quantities of myrrh and dried rose leaves, along with a little frankincense, for the same purpose, and toss it on the coals; or burn juniper and their berries. Since cleanliness is a great aid to health, my advice is that all your clothes smell pleasant and are clean, and that you wash your hands and face not in warm water, but with rose water and cold vinegar, or with clear water and vinegar in which the peels or barks of oranges and pomegranates are boiled; or the peels of apples and sorrel are simmered: for so you will close the pores against the air, so that it does not enter easily, and cool and temper those parts so washed, according to the right intention in curing this disease. For in all the discourse, preservation, 371 and cure of this disease, the main goal is to provide such things that by their nature have the ability through cooling, drying, and closing to resist putrefaction, strengthen and defend the spirits, comfort the heart, and protect the body against the displeasure of the corrupt air. Therefore, it would be wise to take this composition every morning, weighing two drachms in six spoonfuls of water or sorrel juice, and sprinkle it on your food like pepper. ℞ Seīs citri. acetos. ros. rub. sādal. citrin. ān. ʒ i boli armeni oriētal. ʒ i. s, terr. sigil. ʒ s, margarit. ʒ i, fol. auri puri. no. iiij, misce. & f. pul. diuidatur ad pōd. ʒ s. Or instead of this, take fasting the quantity of a small bean of Mithridatum or Venice treacle in a spoonful of sorrel, or scabious water, or by itself. And when going outside, have either a handkerchief with vinegar and rose water, or a little musk ball made of nutmeg, mace, cloves, saffron, & cinnamon, each weighing two drachms finely beaten; of mastic weighing two drachms, of storax five drachms, of ladanum ten drachms, of ambergris six grains, and of musk three grains dissolved in right Muscadel: mix all together and make a ball. In the absence of Mithridatum or similar, as I mentioned before, use daily syrups of pomegranates, lemons, and sorrel, each half an ounce, with as much of the waters of tormentil, sorrel, and dragon's blood, fasting in the morning and one hour before supper. A toast in vinegar or verjuice of grapes, with a little cinnamon powder and sweet flag sprinkled on it. Or two figs with one nut kernel, and ten leaves of rue in each, with a little salt. Or butter, rue, and sage, with bread eaten in the morning close to your heart, are as good preservatives as they are easy to obtain. I offer these preservatives particularly among many others to be sought further, because these may be more easily found and at hand in need, which is now my main endeavor, as most fruitful to those I write to. And this should be done in the sickness time when you first hear it coming and begun, but not in the fit. Always remembering not to go out fasting. For as Cornelius Celsus writes, venom or infection takes hold much sooner in a body still fasting than in one that is not fasting. Yet this is not to be understood to mean that in the morning we should immediately stuff our bellies full as Englishmen do (as the Frenchman says to our shame), but to be content with our preservatives, or with a little food both at breakfast (if custom and need require) lunch and supper. For otherwise nature, if the disease should take us, would have more trouble against a full belly and a fierce disease than it is able to sustain.

Aftre diete and ayer followethe filling or emptieng. Of filling in the name of repletiō I spake before. Of ēptieng, I will now shortely write as of a thing very necessary for the conseruation of mannes healthe.372 For if that whiche is euel within, be not by good meanes & wayes wel fet oute, it often times destroyeth the lyfe. Good meanes to fet out the euelle stuffe of the body be two, abstinence, & auoydance.

After diet, filling or emptying follows. I previously spoke about filling in the context of replenishment. Now, I will briefly discuss emptying, as it is essential for maintaining human health.372 If what is harmful inside is not properly removed through good methods, it can often destroy life. The two effective methods for expelling the harmful substances from the body are abstinence and avoidance.

Abstinence, in eatynge and drinckynge litle, as a lytle before I sayed, and seldome. For so, more goeth awaie then comethe, and by litle and litle it wasteth the humours & drieth. Therfore (as I wiene) throughe the counseil of Phisike, & by the good ciuile, & politique ordres, tēdring the wealth of many so much geuē to their bellies to their own hurtes & damages, not able for wāt of reasō to rule thē selues, & therby enclined to al vices and diseases: for thauoiding of these same, increase of vertue, witte and health, sauing victualles, making plenty, auoyding lothesomenesse or wearinesse, by chaunge, in taking sometime of that in the sea, and not alwaies destroieng yt of the lande, an ordre (without the whiche nothing can stand) and comon wealth, dayes of abstinence, and fasting were firste made, and not for religion onely.

Abstinence, in eating and drinking little, as I mentioned earlier, and rarely. Because, in that way, more goes away than comes in, and little by little it depletes the humors and dries them out. Therefore, as I believe, through the counsel of medicine, and by good civil and political orders, much wealth is wasted when people consume too much, leading to their own harm and inability to manage themselves, causing them to fall into all sorts of vices and illnesses. To avoid these issues, we should aim for an increase in virtue, wisdom, and health, saving resources and creating abundance, avoiding unappealingness or tiredness through variety, sometimes taking from the sea and not always depleting the land's resources. This order, without which nothing can thrive, and the common good, established days of abstinence and fasting, were created, not solely for religious reasons.

Auoidance, because it cānot be safely done withoute the healpe of a good Phisicien, I let passe here, expressing howe it shoulde bee done duelye accordinge to the nature of the disease and the estate of the personne, in an other booke made by me in Latine, vppon this same matter and disease. Who therfore lusteth to see more, let him loke vpon that boke. Yet here thus much wil I say, that if after euacuation or auoiding of humors, the pores of the skinne remaine close, and ye sweating excrement in the fleshe continueth grosse (whiche thinge howe to know, hereafter I will declare) then rubbe you the person meanly at home, & bathe him in faire water sodden with Fenel, Chamemil, Rosemarye, Mallowes, & Lauendre, & last of al, powre water half colde ouer al his body, and so dry him, & clothe him. Al these be to be don a litle before ye end of ye spring, that the humours may be seatled, and at rest, before the time of the sweting, whiche cometh comonly in somer, if it cometh at al. For the tormoiling of the body in that time when it ought to be most quiete, at rest, and armed against his enemy, liketh me not beste here, no more then in the pestilence. Yet for the presente nede, if it be so thoughte good to a learned and discrete Phisicien, I condescend the rather. For as in thys, so in alle others before rehearsed, I remytte you to the discretion of a learned manne in phisike, who maye iudge what is to be done, and how, according to the present estate of youre bodies, nature, custome, and proprety, age, strength, delyghte and qualitie, tyme of the yeare, with other circumstaunces, and thereafter to geue the quantitie, and make diuersitie of hys medicine. Other wise loke not to receiue by this boke that good which I entend, but that euel which by your owne foly you vndiscretelye bring. For good counseil may be abused. And for me to write of euery particular estate and case, whiche be so manye as there be menne, were so great almost a busines, as to numbre the sandes in the sea.373 Therfore seke you out a good Phisicien, and knowen to haue skille, and at the leaste be so good to your bodies, as you are to your hosen or shoes, for the wel making or mending wherof, I doubt not but you wil diligently searche out who is knowē to be the best hosier or shoemaker in the place where you dwelle: and flie the vnlearned as a pestilence in a comune wealth. As simple women, carpenters, pewterers, brasiers, sopeballesellers, pulters, hostellers, painters, apotecaries (otherwise then for their drogges,) auaunters thē selues to come from Pole, Constantinople, Italie, Almaine, Spaine, Fraunce, Grece and Turkie, Inde, Egipt or Jury: from ye seruice of Emperoures, kinges & quienes, promising helpe of al diseases, yea vncurable, with one or twoo drinckes, by waters sixe monethes in continualle distillinge, by Aurum potabile, or quintessence, by drynckes of great and hygh prices, as though thei were made of the sūne, moone, or sterres, by blessynges and Blowinges, Hipocriticalle prayenges, and foolysh smokynges of shirtes Smockes and kerchieffes, wyth suche others theire phantasies, and mockeryes, meaninge nothinge els but to abuse your light belieue, and scorne you behind your backes with their medicines (so filthie, that I am ashamed to name theim) for your single wit and simple belief, in trusting thē most, whiche you know not at al, and vnderstād least: like to them whiche thinke, farre foules haue faire fethers, althoughe thei be neuer so euel fauoured & foule: as thoughe there coulde not be so conning an Englishman, as a foolish running stranger, (of others I speake not) or so perfect helth by honest learning, as by deceiptfull ignorance. For in the erroure of these vnlerned, reasteth the losse of your honest estimation, diere bloudde, precious spirites, and swiete lyfe, the thyng of most estimation and price in this worlde, next vnto the immortal soule.

Avoidance, because it can't be safely done without the help of a good physician, I will leave out here, expressing how it should be done properly according to the nature of the disease and the state of the person, in another book I wrote in Latin about this same topic. So, for those who want to learn more, let them look at that book. However, I will say this much: if after the evacuation or getting rid of humors, the pores of the skin remain closed and the sweating remains thick (which I will explain how to identify later), then rub the person gently at home, and bathe them in warm water boiled with fennel, chamomile, rosemary, mallows, and lavender, and finally pour water half-cold over their entire body, then dry them off and dress them. All these should be done a little before the end of spring, so that the humors can settle and be at rest before the sweating time, which usually comes in summer, if it comes at all. For the disturbance of the body at a time when it should be most calm, at rest, and ready against its enemy doesn't sit well with me, just like during a plague. Yet for immediate needs, if a learned and sensible physician thinks it good, I am more agreeable. For, as in this case, so in all others previously mentioned, I defer to the judgment of a knowledgeable man in medicine, who can decide what should be done and how, based on the current state of your bodies, their nature, habits, personal characteristics, age, strength, preferences, quality, time of year, and other circumstances, and then provide the correct dosage and variation of his medicine. Otherwise, don’t expect to gain from this book the benefits I intend, but only the harm that your own folly may bring. Good advice can be misused. And for me to write about every specific condition and case, of which there are as many as there are people, would be such a vast undertaking, it would be like counting the sands in the sea.373 Therefore, seek out a good physician known to have skill, and at least show as much care for your health as you do for your clothes or shoes, for which I have no doubt you will diligently look for the best shoemaker or tailor in your area: and avoid the unlearned like a plague in a community. Simple women, carpenters, pewterers, braziers, soap sellers, butchers, innkeepers, painters, apothecaries (other than for their drugs) often claim to come from Poland, Constantinople, Italy, Germany, Spain, France, Greece, Turkey, India, Egypt, or Judea: from the service of emperors, kings, and queens, promising cures for all diseases, even those deemed incurable, with one or two drinks, by waters distilled for six months, by Aurum potabile, or quintessence, by drinks of high price, as if they were made from the sun, moon, or stars, by blessings and puffing, hypocritical prayers, and foolish smokings of shirts, smocks, and handkerchiefs, with other such fantasies and mockeries, intending nothing but to deceive your gullible trust and mock you behind your backs with their medicines (so filthy I am ashamed to name them) for your simple-mindedness and naivete in trusting those you do not know at all and understand the least: like those who think that distant birds have beautiful feathers, even if they are ever so ugly and foul: as if there couldn’t be a more cunning Englishman than a foolish wandering stranger (I speak not of others) or better health through honest learning than through deceitful ignorance. For in the errors of these unlearned ones lies the loss of your good reputation, dear blood, precious spirits, and sweet life, the most valued and precious things in this world, next to the immortal soul.

For consuming of euel matter within, and for making our bodies lustye, galiard, & helthful, I do not a litle cōmende exercise, whiche in vs Englishe men I allowe quick, and liuishe: as to runne after houndes and haukes, to shote, wrastle, play at Tēnes and weapons, tosse the winde balle, skirmishe at base (an exercise for a gentlemanne, muche vsed among the Italianes,) and vaughting vpon an horse. Bowling, a good excercise for women: castinge of the barre and camping, I accompt rather a laming of legges, then an exercise. Yet I vtterly reproue theim not, if the hurt may be auoyded. For these a conueniente tyme is, before meate: due measure, reasonable sweatinge, in al times of the yeare, sauing in the sweatinge tyme. In the whiche I allow rather quietnesse then exercise, for opening the body, in suche persons specially as be liberally & freely brought vp. Others, except sitting artificers, haue theire exercises by daily labours in their occupatiōs, to whom nothing niedeth but solace onely, a thing conuenient for euery bodye that lusteth to liue in helth. For els as nō other thing, so not healthe canne be longe durable. Thus I speake of solace, that I meane374 not Idlenesse, wisshing alwayes no man to be idle, but to be occupied in some honest kinde of thing necessary in a cōmon welth. For I accompt thē not worthi meate & drink in a cōmō welth, yt be not good for some purpose or seruice therin, but take thē rather as burdennes vnprofitable and heauye to the yearth, men borne to fille a numbre only, and wast the frutes whiche therthe doeth grue, willing soner to fiede the Lacedemonians old & croked asse, whiche labored for the liuing so long as it coulde for age, then suche an idle Englisshe manne. If the honestye and profite of honeste labour and exercise, conseruation of healthe, preseruation from sickenesse, maintenaunce of lyfe, aduancement, safety from shamefull deathes, defence from beggerye, dyspleasures by idlenesse, shamefulle diseases by the same, hatefulle vices, and punishemente of the immortalle soule, canne not moue vs to reasonable laboure and excercise, and to be profitable membres of the commune welthe, let at the least shame moue vs, seyng that other country menne, of nought, by their owne witte, diligence, labour and actiuitie, can picke oute of a cast bone, a wrethen strawe, a lyghte fether, or an hard stone, an honeste lyuinge: Nor ye shal euer heare theym say, alas master, I haue nō occupaciō, I must either begge or steale. For they can finde other meanes betwene these two. And forsomuche as in the case that nowe is, miserable persons are to be relieued in a cōmon welth, I would wisshe for not fauouring the idle, the discretion of Marc. Cicero the romaine were vsed in healping them: Who wolde compassion should be shewed vpon them, whome necessitie compelled to do or make a faute: & no cōpassion vpon them, in whome a faulte made necessitie. A faulte maketh necessitie, in this case of begging, in them, whyche might laboure and serue, & wil not for idlenes: and therfore not to be pitied, but rather to be punished. Necessitie maketh a fault in thē, whiche wold labor and serue, but cānot for age, īpotēcy, or sickenes, and therfore to be pitied & relieued. But to auoyde punishmente & to shew the waye to amendmente, I would again wishe, yt forsomuch as we be so euel disposed of our selfes to our own profites and comodities with out help, this old law were renued, which forbiddeth the nedy & impotent parentes, to be releued of those their welthi chyldren, that by theym or theire meanes were not broughte vppe, eyther in good learning and Science, or honeste occupation. For so is a man withoute science, as a realme withoute a kyng. Thus muche of exercise, and for exercise. To the which I wolde now ioyne honeste companye betwene man and woman, as a parte of natural exercise, and healpe to ye emptieng & lightning the bodye in other tymes allowed, in this sweating tyme for helthes sake, & for feare of opening the bodye, and resoluing the spirites, not approued, but for dout, that wt lengthing the boke, I shold wery ye reader. Therfore I let yt passe & come to sleping & waking, whiche without good ordre, be gretly hurtful to the bodie. For auoiding 375the whiche, I take the meane to be best, and against this sweat moste commendable. But if by excesse a man must in eyther part offend, I permit rather to watch to muche, then to lie in bedde to longe: so that in watchinge, there be no way to surfetting. Al these thinges duely obserued, and well executed, whiche before I haue for preseruation mencioned, if more ouer we can sette a parte al affections, as fretting cares & thoughtes, dolefull or sorowfull imaginations, vaine feares, folysh loues, gnawing hates, and geue oure selues to lyue quietly, frendlie, & merily one with an outher, as men were wont to do in the old world, whē this countrie was called merye Englande, and euery man to medle in his own matters, thinking theim sufficient, as thei do in Italye, and auoyde malyce and dissencion, the destruction of commune wealthes, and priuate houses: I doubte not but we shall preserue oure selues, bothe from this sweatinge syckenesse, and other diseases also not here purposed to be spoken of.

For consuming the unhealthy matter inside us and for making our bodies lively, strong, and healthy, I highly recommend exercise, which I consider quick and lively for us Englishmen: such as running after hounds and hawks, shooting, wrestling, playing tennis and various weapons games, tossing a windball, skirmishing in base (a gentleman's exercise much used among the Italians), and vaulting on a horse. Bowling is a good exercise for women. Throwing the bar and camping I consider more of a strain on the legs than a true exercise. However, I do not completely disapprove of them if the risk of injury can be avoided. The ideal time for these activities is before meals, with reasonable effort and moderate sweating throughout the year, except during hot weather. During that time, I recommend rest over exercise, especially for those raised in a more privileged way. Others, except for those who sit for their jobs, get their exercise through daily work. They need only leisure, which is suitable for everyone who wants to live healthily. Otherwise, just like anything else, health cannot last indefinitely. So, when I mention leisure, I do not mean idleness; I always wish that no one remains idle but instead stays engaged in some honest endeavor that benefits the community. I deem those unworthy of food and drink in a commonwealth who provide no benefit or service, but rather see them as burdensome and heavy on the earth, men born only to take up space and waste the fruits that the earth produces, preferring to feed a haggard old Lacedemonian donkey, which worked for a living as long as it could, than such an idle Englishman. If the dignity and benefits of honest labor and exercise—preservation of health, protection from illness, maintenance of life, advancement, safety from shameful deaths, protection from poverty, unpleasantness brought by idleness, shameful diseases from it, hateful vices, and punishment of the immortal soul—cannot motivate us to reasonable work and exercise and to be useful members of the commonwealth, then at least let shame influence us, seeing that other countries can, through their own intelligence, diligence, labor, and activity, scrape a decent living from little more than a discarded bone, a bent straw, a light feather, or a hard stone. You will never hear them say, "Oh master, I have no job; I must either beg or steal." For they can always find alternatives beyond those two options. And as miserable individuals need to be helped in a commonwealth, I wish that the discretion of Marcus Cicero of Rome were used in aiding them: he would have believed that compassion should be shown to those compelled by necessity to take action or make a mistake, but not to those making excuses out of laziness. A fault creates necessity in those who could labor and serve but choose not to due to idleness; therefore, they are not to be pitied but rather punished. Necessity creates a fault in those who would work and serve but cannot due to age, disability, or illness, and they should be pitied and helped. To avoid punishment and provide a path toward betterment, I would again suggest that since we are so poorly disposed toward our own benefits and comforts without aid, this ancient law be renewed, prohibiting needy and incapable parents from being supported by their wealthy children if they have not been raised either in good learning and science or in honest work. For a man without knowledge is like a realm without a king. Thus much for exercise, and for the role of exercise. I would now like to add the aspect of honest companionship between men and women as a part of natural exercise, helping to relieve and lighten the body during times when such activities are allowed, particularly during this hot season for health's sake, and out of fear of opening the body and weakening the spirits—though I do not approve of this with any certainty, but I fear that by prolonging my writing, I may tire the reader. Therefore, I shall move on to sleeping and waking, which, without proper order, can greatly harm the body. To avoid this, I find moderation to be best and most commendable against this sweat. However, if one must err due to excess in either direction, I would prefer one to stay awake too much than to lie in bed for too long, provided that in wakefulness there is no chance of overindulgence. If all these things are duly observed and well executed, which I have previously mentioned for preservation, and if we can further set aside all affections such as worrying cares and thoughts, sorrowful imaginations, vain fears, foolish loves, gnawing hates, and give ourselves to live quietly, friendly, and merrily with one another, as people used to do in the old world when this country was called merry England and everyone minded their own business, considering it sufficient like they do in Italy, avoiding malice and discord, the destruction of commonwealths and private households, I have no doubt we will preserve ourselves from this sweating sickness and other diseases not mentioned here.

The cure or remedy.—But if in leauinge a parte these or some of them, or negligently executing them, it chaunceth the disease of sweating to trouble our bodies, then passinge the bondes and compasse of preseruation, we must come to curation, the way to remedie the disease, & the third and last parte (as I first sayed) to be entreated in this boke. The principalle entente herof, is to let out the venime by sweate accordinge to the course of nature. This is brought to passe safely two waies, by suffring and seruing handsomly nature, if it thruste it oute readily and kindely: and helping nature, if it be letted, or be weake in expellinge. Serue nature we shall, if in what time so euer it taketh vs, or what so euer estate, we streyghte lay vs downe vppon oure bedde, yf we be vp and in oure clothes, not takyinge them of: or lie stille, if we be in bed out of our clothes, laiyng on clothes both wayes, if we wante, reasonably, and not loadinge vs therewith vnmeasurably. Thus layed and couered, we must endeuoure our selues so to continue wyth al quietnes, & for so much as may be without feare, distruste, or faintehartednesse, an euel thinge in al diseases. For suche surrendre and geue ouer to the disease without resistence. By whiche occasion manye more died in the fyrste pestilence at Athenes, that I spake of in the beginnynge of thys boke, then other wyse should. Oure kepers, friendes and louers, muste also endeuoure theym selues to be handesome and dilygente aboute vs, to serue vs redilye at al turnes, and neuer to leaue vs duringe foure and twentie houres, but to loke welle vnto vs, that neyther we caste of oure clothes, nor thruste out hande or foote, duryng the space of the saide foure and twenty houres. For albeit the greate daungere be paste after twelue houres, or fourtene, the laste of trial, yet many die aftre by to muche boldenes, when thei thinke theim selues most in suretye, or negligence in attendaunce, when they thinke no necessitie. Wherby it is proued that without dout, the handsome diligence, or carelesse negligence, 376is the sauing, or casting awaye of many. If ij. be taken in one bed, let theym so continue, althoughe it be to their vnquietnesse. For feare wherof, & for the more quietnesse & safetye, very good it is duryng all the sweating time, that two persones lye not in one bed. If with this quietnes, diligēce, and ordre, the sicke do kindelye sweate, suffre them so to continue, without meate all the xxiiij. houres: withoute drincke, vntil the fifth houre, if it maie be. Alwayes taking hede to theim in the fourth, seuenth, nineth, & eleuenth houres speciallye, and fourteenth also, as the laste of triall and daungier, but of lesse in bothe. For these be most perilous, as I haue obserued this yere in this disease, hauing ye houres iudicial, as others haue theire dayes, and therfore worse to geue anye thinge in, for troublyng nature standyng in trialle. Yet wher more daunger is in forbearyng then in takyng, I counseill not to spare in these howres to do as the case requireth with wisdome & discretion, but lesse then in other howres. In the fifthe howre geue theim to drinke clarified ale made only doulcet with a litle suger, out of a cruet, or glasse made in cruet facion, with a nebbe, for feare of raisynge theim selues to receiue the drinke offered, & so to let the sweat, by the ayer strikyng in. But if the sicke on this wise beforesaid cānot sweate kyndly, then nature must be holpen, as I sayd before. And for so moch as sweat is letted in this disease fower waies, by disorder, wekenes of nature, closenes of the pores in the skinne, & grosnes of the humoures: my counseil is to auoide disorder by suche meanes as hetherto I haue taught, and next to open the pores if they be close, and make thinne the matter, if it be grosse, and prouoke sweat, if nature be weke. Those you shal doe by gentle rubbynges, this by warme drinckes as hereafter streight I will declare. And for that euery man hath not the knowlege to discerne which of these is the cause of let in sweatyng, I wil shewe you plainly howe to do with moste suretie and leste offense. I wyll beginne with wekenes of nature. Therefore remember well that in treatynge the causes of this disease, I sayed that this sweate chauncethe cōmonly in theim of the mydde age and beste luste, the infection hauyng a certein concordance, or conuenience with the corrupte spirites of theim more then others. Knowe agayne that nature is weke, ij. waies, either in the selfe, or by the annoiance of an other. In the selfe, by wante of strength consumed by sicknes or other wise. By annoiaunce of an other, when nature is so ouerlaid with the quantitie of euill humours that it can not stirre. Betwene thes two set youre witte, and se whether the persō be lustye or sickly. If he be lustye, vnderstande that the sweat doth not stoppe for wekenes of nature in it selfe. Then of necessitie it must be for some of thother causes. But for whiche, thus knowe. Consider whether the lusty person were in foretyme geuen to moche drynkyng, eatyng and rauenyng, to moch ease, to no exercise or bathinges in his helth, or no. If all these you finde in377 him, knowe that bothe nature is wekened by the annoiance of the humoures, and that the skinne is stopped, and the humoure grosse, and that for thys the sweate is letted. If you finde onely some of these, and that rauenynge, annoiance is the cause. If want of exercise or bathinges, stoppinges of the pores and closenesse, or grosenes of humours, or bothe, be the cause of not sweatying. On the othersyde, if the persō be sickely, it is easely knowē that his wekenes consisteth in nature the self. And for so moche as weke folkes and sicke shal also by other causes not sweate, consider if in his sickenes he hath swette moche or no, or hath bē disposed to it and coulde not. If he neither hath swette, nor coulde sweat disposed, knowe that closenes of the skinne, and grosenes of the humour is the cause. Therfore euery thing in his kynde muste be remedied, Wekenes of nature, by drinkes prouokyng sweate: closenes, & grosenes, by rubbynge, as I said. But be ware neither to rubbe or geue drinkes, excepte you see cause as beforesayd. For other wise, the one hindrethe nature, and thother letteth out the spirites & wasteth ye strength. Therefore accordyngly, if rubbe you must, geue to the sicke in to their beddes a newe and somewhat harde kerchefe, well warmed but not hote, and bydde theim rubbe all their bodies ouer therewith vnder the clothes, neither to moche neither to litle, nor to harde or to softe, but meanely betwene, takyng you hede whiche be aboute them, that by stirrynge their armes they raise not the clothes to let in the ayer. This done, if case so require, geue thē a good draught of hote possette ale made of swiete milke turned with vinegre, in a quarte wherof percely, and sage, of eche haulfe one litle handfull hath been sodden, wyth iii. sliftes of rosemary, ii. fenel rootes cutte, and a fewe hole maces. Alwaies remembrynge here, as in other places of this boke, to heate the herbes in a peuter dishe before the fyre, or washe theim in hote water, before you putte them in to the posset ale, and that you putte their to no colde herbes at any tyme durynge the hole fitte. Or geue theim posset ale hote with rosemary, dittane, & germander. Or baie beries, anise seades, & calamintes with claret wine sodden and dronke warme. Or white wine with hore and wilde tansy growen in medes sodden therin, and ii. d. weight of good triacle, dronke hote, or in ye stede of that, wilde tanesy, mogwort or feuerfue. These prouoke sweat, may easely be hadde, & be metest for thē which haue al ye causes beforesayde of lettyng thesame. But specially if for colde and grose humoures, or for closenes of the skinne, the sweate commethe not furthe. If with one draught they sweate not, geue theim one other, or ij. successiuely, after halfe one houre betwene, and encrease the clothes, first a litle aboue the meane, after, more or lesse as the cause requireth, & make a litle fire in the chamber of clene woode, as ashe & oke, with the perfume of bdellium: or swiet woode, as Juniper, fyrre, or pine, by theimselues: remembrynge to withdrawe the378 fire, when they sweat fully, and the clothes aboue the meane, by litle and litle as you laide theim on, when they firste complaine of faintyng. And after xii. or xiiii. houres, some also of the meane, but one after an other by halfe one houre successiuely with discrecion, alwaies not lokyng so moche to the quantitie of the sweat, as what the sicke may saufely beare. And in suche case of faintynge, suffer competent open aier to come into the chamber, if the same and the wether be hote, for smoderynge the pacient, by suche windowes as the wynde liethe not in, nor openeth to the south. Put to their noses to smell vinegre and rose water in an handkercher, not touchynge theim there with so nighe as maye be. Cause theim to lie on their right side, and bowe theim selues forward, call theim by their names, and beate theim with a rosemary braunche, or some other swete like thynge. In the stede of posset ale, they whiche be troubled with gowtes, dropsies, reumes, or suche other moiste euill diseases, chauncing to sweat, may drinke a good draught of the stronger drinke of Guaiacum so hote as they can, for the lyke effecte, as also others may, not hauynge these deseases, if it be so redy to theim as the other. After they ones sweat fully, myne aduise is not to geue any more posset ale, but clarified ale with suger, duryng the hole fitte, neither vnreasonably, nor so ofte as they call for it, neither yet pinchyng theym to moche when they haue nede, alwayes takynge hede not to putte any colde thynge in their mouthe to cole and moiste them with, nor any colde water, rose water, or colde vinegre to their face duryng the sweat and one daie after at the leaste, but alwaies vse warmeth accordynge to nature, neuer contrariyng thesame so nighe as may be. If they raue or be phrenetike, putte to their nose thesame odour of rose water & vinegre, to lette the vapoures from the headde. If they slepe, vse theim as in the case of faintyng I said, with betyng theim and callynge theim, pullyng theim by the eares, nose, or here, suffering them in no wise to slepe vntil suche tyme as they haue no luste to slepe, except to a learned mā in phisicke the case appere to beare the contrary. For otherwise the venime in slepe continually runneth inward to ye hart. The contrary hereof we muste alwaies intende, in prouokyng it outwarde by all meanes duryng the fitte, whyche so longe lasteth in burnynge and sweatyng, as the matter thereof hath any fyrie or apte partes therfore. For as great & strong wine, ale, or bere, so longe do burne as there is matter in theim apte to be burned, and then cesse when that whiche remainethe is come againe to hys firste nature: that is, to suche water clere & vnsauery, as either the bruer receiued of the riuer, or vine of the earth: euen so the body so longe continuethe burnynge and sweatynge, as their is matter apte therefore in the spirites, and then leaueth, when the corrupcion taken of the finest of the euill blode is consumed, and the spirites lefte pure and cleane as they were before the tyme of their corruption.

The cure or remedy.—But if we neglect any part of these steps or fail to carry them out properly, and we find ourselves suffering from the sweating sickness, we must go beyond mere prevention and seek a cure, which is the focus of this book. The main goal here is to release the toxins through sweating, in line with nature's course. We can achieve this safely in two ways: by allowing nature to naturally expel what it needs to if it's able, and by assisting nature if it is hindered or struggles to expel it. We should support nature by immediately lying down on our bed whenever we are taken ill, whether we are still dressed or not. If we're in bed without clothes, we should lie still and cover ourselves comfortably without overloading ourselves with too many blankets. Once settled and covered, we must strive to remain calm and not let fear, doubt, or anxiety overtake us—these feelings can worsen any illness. Surrendering to the sickness without fighting back has often led to more deaths during past plagues, like the first one at Athens, which I mentioned at the start of this book, than would otherwise have occurred. Our caretakers, friends, and loved ones must also remain attentive and diligent in caring for us, staying close during the 24-hour period and making sure we're not removing our clothes or exposing any parts of our body during that time. Even though the greatest danger usually passes after 12 or 14 hours, many still suffer from harsh consequences due to overconfidence or negligence when they believe themselves to be out of danger. This shows that careful diligence or careless negligence can be the difference between life and death for many. If two people are sharing a bed, they should stay close together despite any discomfort; however, to ensure safety and peace during the sweating period, it is best that two individuals do not sleep in the same bed. If the sick individual sweats profusely, they should be allowed to continue without food all 24 hours and without drink until at least the fifth hour if possible. Always keep a close check on them, especially during the fourth, seventh, ninth, eleventh, and fourteenth hours, as these are critical and more dangerous. I've noticed this year that these hours are particularly perilous during this disease, which is why care should be taken about what is given to them during these times, as too much intervention can disturb nature's recovery process. If there is more danger in forbearance rather than in taking, I advise to not hesitate to respond as the situation demands, using wisdom and discretion, but less aggressively compared to other times. In the fifth hour, give them to drink clarified ale sweetened with a little sugar, served from a jug or glass designed for easy pouring, to avoid them needing to sit up and risk losing the sweat by air exposure. But if they can't sweat sufficiently in this way, then nature must be aided as I previously mentioned. Sweating may be obstructed in this disease for four reasons: disorder, weakness of nature, closeness of the skin pores, and the thickening of bodily humors. My advice is to avoid disorder by means I have already described, then to open the pores if they are closed, to thin out the thick humors, and to encourage sweating if nature is weak. These can be achieved through gentle rubbing and warm drinks, as I will elaborate on shortly. Since not everyone knows how to discern which of these factors is obstructing sweating, I will plainly explain how to handle each situation with utmost care and minimal discomfort. I will start with natural weakness. It’s important to remember that this sweating sickness usually occurs in those of middle age and best health, as the infection aligns well with their corrupt humors more than in others. Know that weakness in nature can occur in two ways: either from internal depletion due to illness or otherwise, or by the influence of external factors, when the body is so overwhelmed by excessive harmful humors that it cannot function. You should assess whether the person is vigorous or frail. If they appear robust, understand that their inability to sweat isn’t due to internal weakness. Therefore, it must stem from one of the other factors. Determine which by examining whether the healthy individual has a history of excessive drinking, eating, indulgence, lack of exercise, or bathing while in good health. If all these factors are evident, know that both nature is weakened by the excess of humors, the skin is blocked, the humidities thickened, which leads to sweating being obstructed. If you find only a few of these factors, then disturbances due to indulgence are likely the cause. Lack of exercise or bathing can lead to blockages of skin pores and thickened humors as well. Conversely, if the person appears frail, then it’s easy to see that their weakness lies within their own nature. And since weak individuals and the sick may not sweat due to other causes, consider whether, during their illness, they’ve been sweating profusely, or whether they’ve had the disposition to sweat but couldn’t. If neither sweating nor the ability to sweat is present, know that blockage of the skin and thickness of the humors are the culprits. Therefore, all conditions must be addressed accordingly: weakness must be remedied with drinks that promote sweating; blockages and thickness must be remedied through rubbing, as I explained earlier. However, be cautious not to rub or administer drinks unless there is clear cause as mentioned before. Otherwise, one may hinder nature while the other depletes the strength. If you must rub, provide the sick one with a new, somewhat firm, warm cloth, but not hot, and have them rub their entire body with it under the blankets, neither too gently nor too harshly, just moderately, while ensuring those around them do not lift the blankets to let in the air. Once that is done, if needed, give them a generous draught of hot posset ale made with sweetened milk and vinegar, boiled with a handful each of parsley and sage, three sprigs of rosemary, two fennel roots, and a few whole maces. Always remember to heat the herbs in a pewter dish over the fire, or wash them in hot water before adding them to the posset ale, and never add cold herbs at any time during the process. Alternatively, you can offer them hot posset ale infused with rosemary, dittany, and germander, or with bay berries, anise seeds, and calamint, simmered with claret wine and drunk warm. You can also use white wine with horehound and wild tansy, cooked together with a certain weight of good treacle, served hot, or, instead of that, wild tansey, mugwort, or feverfew. These drinks promote sweating, are easily obtainable, and are suited for those who have all the mentioned causes of obstruction. Especially if the sweating is hindered by cold or thick humors or by closures in the skin. If one drink does not induce sweating, offer them another or two, one after the other, after a half hour in between, and increase the number of blankets, slowly at first, then adding more or less as necessary, and create a small fire in the room using clean wood, like ash and oak, along with the scent of bdellium, or sweet woods like juniper, fir, or pine, but remember to remove the fire when they begin to sweat profusely, and gradually reduce the number of blankets as necessary when they first complain of feeling faint. After 12 or 14 hours, you may also remove some blankets, but one at a time, spaced by half an hour, and always prioritize how much sweat the sick person can safely endure over sheer quantity. And in instances of faintness, allow some fresh air into the chamber, if the weather is warm, to avoid suffocating the patient, opening windows that don’t let in wind or face south. Let them smell vinegar and rose water in a cloth without coming too close. Have them lie on their right side and lean forward; call them by name and lightly beat them with a rosemary branch or some sweet-smelling object. Instead of posset ale, those suffering from gout, dropsy, colds, or similar moist illnesses that cause sweating can take a good drink of hot Guaiacum alcohol for the same effect, as others can too, provided it is ready for them. Once they begin to sweat thoroughly, I advise against giving any more posset ale, and instead, provide clarified ale with sugar throughout the entire infectious period, neither in unreasonable quantities nor as often as they crave it, and not to withhold it from them if they truly need it, always avoiding cold items being placed in their mouths to cool and moisten them, nor should cold water, rose water, or cold vinegar touch their face during sweating and for at least a day afterwards, using warmth in accordance to nature and never opposing that natural warmth unless absolutely necessary. If they show signs of delirium or madness, apply the same scents of rose water and vinegar to disperse any vapors from their head. If they fall asleep, treat them as if they are fainting, as previously described, by nudging them awake and gently calling their names, pulling their ears, nose, or hair, ensuring they do not sleep until they lose the desire to sleep unless a knowledgeable physician contradicts this advice. Otherwise, the toxins will continuously seep into the heart during sleep. Our goal, then, is to persistently provoke it outward by every means possible throughout the fit, which lasts as long as the bodily humors have anything fiery or appropriate for burning. Just like strong wines and ales burn as long as there is suitable content to be burned, and then cease once what remains returns to its original nature—that is to a pure and unsavory water as either taken from the river or from the earth—so too will the body continue burning and sweating as long as there are humors suitable for doing so, and it will stop once the corruption from the worst blood is consumed, leaving the spirits purified and clear as they were before the time of their corruption.

379

379

This done, and the body by sufficient sweate discharged of the venime, the persone is saulfe. But if he by vnrulines & brekyng his sweate, sweateth not sufficiently, thē he is in daunger of death by yt venime that doth remaine, or at the leaste to sweat ones againe or oftener, as many hath done, fallynge in thrise, sixe tymes, yea, xii. tymes some. If sufficiently the sweate be come, you shal know by the lightnes & cherefulnes of the body, & lanckenes in all partes, by the continuall sweatyng the hole daie and out of all partes, whyche be the beste and holsome sweates. The other which come but by tymes and onely in certein partes, or broken, be not sufficient nor good, but very euill, of whose insufficiency, ij. notes learne: a swellyng in ye partes with a blackenes, & a tinglyng or prickyng in the same. Suche I aduise to appointe theim selues to sweat againe to ridde their bodies of that remaineth, & abide it out vntill they fele their bodies lanke & light, and to moue the sweat as before I said, if thesame come not kyndly by the selfe. If they cānot forbeare meate during ye space of their fitte, and faste out their xxiiij. houres, without danger, geue theim a litle of an alebrie onely, or of a thinne caudel of an egge sodden with one hole mace or ij. If they be forced by nature to ease them selues in the meane time, let them do it rather in warme shetes put into them closely, then to arise. After they haue thus fully swette, conuey closely warme clothes into theyre beddes, and bid them wipe themselues there with in al partes curiouslye: and be ware that no ayer entre into theire open bodies (and speciallye their arme holes, the openest & rarest parte therof) to let the issue of that whych doeth remaine. The lyke may be done in the reste of their fitte, with lyke warenes, for that clenlinesse comfortethe nature, and relieueth the pacient. If in duringe oute the foure and twentye houres there be thought daungiere of death without remouing, rather warme well the other side of the bedde, and wil hym to remoue himself into it, thē to take him vp & remoue hym to an other bed, which in no case mai be done. For better is a doubtful ware hope, then a certeine auentured death. The foure and twenty houres passed duly, they may putte on theire clothes warme, aryse, and refresshe theym selues with a cawdle of an egge swietelye made, or such other meates and sauces reasonably and smally taken, as before I mencioned. And if their strength be sore wasted, let theym smelle to an old swiet apple (as Aristotle did by his reporte in the boke de pomo) or hotte new bread, as Democritus did, by the record of Laertius in his life, either by it self alone, or dipped in wel smelling wyne, as Maluesey or Muscadelle, & sprinckled with the pouder of mintes. Orenges also and Lemones, or suche muske balles as I before described, be thinges mete for this purpose. For as I saied in my ij. litle bokes in Latine de medendi methodo, of deuise to cure diseases, there is no thinge more comfortable to the spirites then good and swiet odoures. On this wise aduised how to380 order your selues in al the time of the fitte, now this remaineth, to exhorte you not to go out of your houses for iij. dayes, or ij. at the least after the fitte passed, and then wiselye, warely, and not except in a faire bright daye, for feare of swouning after great emptinesse, and vnwont ayer, or for forcyng nature by soubdaine strikyng in of thesame aier, colde, or euil, in to the open body. For nature so forced, maketh often tymes a sore and soubdaine fluxe, as wel after auoidaunce of these humores by sweate, (as was this yere well sene in many persones in diuerse contries of Englande for none other cause) as of others by purgation.

Once this is done, and the body has discharged the toxins through enough sweating, the person is safe. But if they sweat inadequately due to restlessness and interrupting their sweat, then they risk death from the remaining toxins, or at the very least need to sweat again or more often, as many people have done, falling into sweats three, six, even twelve times. If the sweating has been sufficient, you'll know by the lightness and cheerfulness of the body and the looseness in all parts, with continuous sweating all day and from all areas, which is the best and healthiest kind of sweat. Sweats that only occur sometimes and in certain areas, or are interrupted, are insufficient and not good, but rather harmful, and you can recognize this insufficiency by two signs: swelling in the areas with a darkness and a tingling or prickling sensation in the same spots. I advise such individuals to prepare themselves to sweat again to rid their bodies of what remains and to endure it until they feel their bodies light and loose, moving the sweat as I mentioned before if the sweat does not come naturally. If they can't refrain from food during the course of their fit and fast for twenty-four hours without danger, give them a little bit of ale or a thin caudle made from an egg boiled with one or two whole mace. If they are compelled by nature to relieve themselves in the meantime, they should do so rather in warm sheets pressed closely against them than getting up. After they have sweated fully, bring warm clothes close to their beds and instruct them to wipe themselves thoroughly in all parts there: and be careful that no air enters their open bodies (especially their armpits, the most open and vulnerable part) to hinder the release of what remains. The same care should be taken for the rest of their fit, as cleanliness comforts nature and relieves the patient. If during the twenty-four hours there is a perceived danger of death without movement, it is better to warm the other side of the bed well and encourage them to shift into it rather than to lift them up and move them to another bed, which must not be done at all. For it is better to take a chance on uncertain hope than to risk certain death. Once the twenty-four hours have passed, they may put on warm clothes, rise, and refresh themselves with a quickly made egg caudle or other gently flavored dishes in small amounts as previously mentioned. If their strength is greatly diminished, let them be given a sniff of a sweet old apple (as Aristotle reportedly did in the book de pomo) or hot fresh bread, as Democritus did, according to Laertius in his life, either alone or dipped in fragrant wine, like Malvasia or Muscadelle, and sprinkled with mint powder. Oranges and lemons, or such musk balls as I previously described, are good for this purpose. For as I mentioned in my two small books in Latin de medendi methodo, which discuss methods for curing diseases, nothing is more comforting to the spirits than good and sweet scents. Having advised you on how to 380 conduct yourselves during the fit, it remains to urge you not to leave your homes for three days, or at least two, after the fit has passed, and then to do so wisely and cautiously, and not except on a bright sunny day, for fear of fainting after great emptiness and unfamiliar air or from forcing nature by suddenly taking in cold or harmful air into the open body. For when nature is forced, it often causes a severe and sudden flux, both after expelling these humors through sweat (as was seen this year in many people in various areas of England for no other cause) and from others through purging.

Thus I haue declared the begynning, name, nature, accidentes, signes, causes, preseruations, and cures naturall of this disease the sweatynge sickenes, English Ephemera, or pestilent sweate, so shortly & plainly as I could for ye cōmune saufty of my good countrimen, help, relieue, & defence of thesame against ye soubdaine assaultes of the disease, & to satisfie the honeste requeste of my louynge frendes and gentleὣ acquaintance. If other causes ther be supernatural, theim I leue to the diuines to serche, and the diseases thereof to cure, as a matter with out the compasse of my facultie.

I've explained the start, name, nature, symptoms, signs, causes, prevention, and natural remedies for this disease known as the sweating sickness, English Ephemera, or pestilential sweat, as clearly and briefly as I could for the common safety of my fellow countrymen, to help, relieve, and protect them against the sudden attacks of this disease, and to satisfy the honorable request of my loving friends and gentle acquaintances. If there are other supernatural causes, I leave those for the theologians to investigate and the diseases resulting from them to treat, as those matters are outside my expertise.


FOOTNOTES:
[1] The author seems to me here to allude to what Sydenham calls the “constitutio epidemica,” as if he would say, “The epidemic constitution as it exists at any one time, is but a step,” &c.
[2] Grafton, Vol. II. pp. 147. 155.
[3] Hall, p. 425.
[4] For suddenlie a deadlie burning sweat so assailed their bodies and distempered their blood with a most ardent heat, that scarce one amongst an hundred that sickened did escape with life; for all in maner as soone as the sweat tooke them, or within a short time after, yeelded the ghost. Holinshed, Vol. III. p. 482. Godwin, p. 98. Polydor. Vergilius, L. XXVI. p. 567. Wood, T. I. A. 1485. p. 233. Wood takes his testimony respecting the symptoms of the disease at third hand from Carol. Valesius, (Cap. XIV. p. 226,) a French physician at Rome, about 1650, who employs P. Foreest’s words. This last author, however, did not himself observe the English sweating sickness.
[5] Bacon, p. 36.
[6] Fabian, p. 673.
[7] Swetynge sykenesse in the Chronicles.
[8] The Mayors’ names were Thomas Hylle and William Stocker. Fabian, loc. cit.
[9] Until the 30th of October. Grafton, p. 158.
[10] Wood, loc. cit.
[11] Phil. de Comines, Tom. I. p. 344. Compare the English chronicles quoted. The history of Croyland Abbey states that the 1st of August was the day of Richmond’s arrival at Milford Haven. There exists no reason for departing from this statement with some modern writers, namely, Kay, du Chesne, p. 1192; Lilie, p. 382, and Marsolier, who assert the landing of the army to have taken place on the 7th of August. Historia Croylandensis, p. 573, in Jo. Fell.
[12] Grafton, p. 147.
[13] Stow, p. 779.
[14] According to the unanimous statements of the chroniclers.
[15] Histor. Croylandens, p. 573. Fell.
[16] Bacon, p. 7. Marsolier, p. 142. Yet in the autumn of that same year Henry established, what no prior king of England ever had, a body-guard. It consisted of only 50 “Yomen of the Crowne,” to each of whom there were appointed two men on foot—an archer and a demi-lance, and a groom to attend to his three horses. The first commander of this body-guard, which formed the most ancient stock whence sprang the English standing army, was Henry Bourchier, Earl of Essex. Herbert of Cherbury, p. 9. Grafton, and the other chroniclers, loc. cit. Baker, p. 254.
[17] Bacon, Stow, Baker, loc. cit. Rapin considered the middle of September as the period of the outbreak. T. IV. p. 386.
[18] “Infinite persons.” Bacon. “A wonderful number.” Stow. “Many thousands.” Baker, loc. cit.
[19] The plague can scarcely be said to furnish this immunity, for though a second attack is an exception to a pretty general rule, it is one of by no means unfrequent occurrence.—Transl. note.
[20] Holinshed, Vol. III. p. 482.
[21] Wood, p. 233.
[22] Histor. Croyland. p. 569. Fell.
[23] No physick afforded any cure. Baker, p. 254.
[24] Henry VII., and Henry VIII. Compare the excellent biographical account of this learned man by Aikin.
[25] Erasmus expresses himself on this subject in his usual manner. He was on terms of strict friendship with Linacre, whom on other occasions he greatly lauds. This, however, does not prevent him from lashing him with his satire as a philological pedant. “Novi quendam most advanced, græcum, latinum, mathematicum, philosophum, medicum, and these are royal, jam sexagenarium, (he was born in 1460, and died in 1524,) qui ceteris rebus omissis, annis plus viginti se torquet ac discruciat in grammatica, prorsus felicem se fore ratus, si tamdiu liceat vivere, donec certo statuat, quomodo distinguendæ sint octo partes orationis, quod hactenus nemo Græcorum aut Latinorum ad plenum præstare valuit.” Laus Stultitiæ, p. 200. That Linacre is here meant is quite plain; the passage applies to no other contemporary.
[26] See the author’s History of Medicine, Book II. p. 311.
[27] Grafton, p. 161, and the other chroniclers.
[28] Wood, loc. cit.
[29] The luscious Greek wines were at this time the most in vogue, especially Cretan wine, Malmsey, and Muschat. Lemnius, de compl. L. II. fol. 111. b. Reusner, p. 70.
[30] Werlich, p. 248.
[31] Spangenberg, Mansf. Chr. fol. 395. f.
[32] Werlich, p. 236. Spangenberg, loc. cit. Overflow of the Lech, 1484. Werlich, p. 239.
[33] Frank von Wörd. fol. 211. a.
[34] Grafton, p. 133, and all the other chroniclers. Short, Vol. I. p. 201, and several others, even Schnurrer, erroneously asserted this inundation to have taken place in the year 1485.
[35] Campo, p. 132. Pfeufer, p. 32.
[36] Frank v. Wörd, fol. 211. a. In the plague which followed, about 20,000 people died in Brixen, and 30,000 in Venice.
[37] Fracastor, p. 182. Morb. Contag. L. II.
[38] Wurstisen, p. 474. cap. 15. Fracastor, p. 136. Spangenberg (Pestilentz) calls this Epidemic of 1482, which spread all over Germany, Switzerland and France, “das phrenitische, schwerhitzig Pestilentzfieber”, the phrenitic, intensely ardent, plague-fever. Compare Stumpff. fol. 742. b.
[39] The so called Hauptkrankheit.
[40] Spangenberg, Mansfeld. Chr. fol. 396. a.
[41] In many places women and children were obliged to draw the plough, from the want of draught cattle; they were obliged too to carry on the cultivation by night, that they might not be observed by the king’s inhuman revenue officers.—Mezeray, Tom. II. p. 750.
[42] “Il couroit alors (1482) dans la France une dangereuse et mortelle maladie, qui affligeoit indifferemment les grands et les petits, bien qu’elle ne fut pas contagieuse. C’étoit une espèce de fièvre chaude et frenetique, qui s’allumoit tout d’un coup dans le cerveau, et le brûloit avec de si cruelles douleurs, que les uns s’en cassoient la teste contre les murailles, les autres se précipitoient dans les puits, ou se tuoient à force de courir çà et là. On en attribu la cause à quelque maligne influence des astres et à la corruption, que la mauvaise nourriture de l’année précédente avoit formé dans le corps; d’autant que les vins et les bleds n’étant point venus à maturité, la disette avoit été si grande, principalement dans les provinces de delà la Loire, que les peuples n’avoient vécu que de racines et d’herbes.” Mezeray, Tom. II. p. 746.
[43] It is expressly affirmed by the historians that many of the higher classes were sleepless from the constant alarm and fear of Tristan’s sword. How greatly must such a condition have predisposed the mind to receive this destructive fever!
[44] Jacques Cotier. He extorted from his patients 10,000 dollars a month, but, after his master’s death, was obliged to refund to Charles VIII., 100,000 dollars. Comines, L. VI. c. 12. p. 400.
[45] Mezeray, loc. cit.
[46] Spangenberg, Mansfeld. Chron. fol. 379. a. Pestilentz, 1485.
[47] Compare Webster, T. I. p. 147.
[48] Spangenberg, Mansfeld. Chron. fol. 398. a., and many other chroniclers. The reader will have the goodness to observe, here and in similar places, that the text is not stating the opinion of the author, but the way in which these events were viewed in that age.
[49] —Il y avoit seulement en Normandie quelque troupes de franc-archers, de ceux, que Louis XI. avoit licenciez, qui couroit la campagne: et plusieurs faineants s’étant joints avec eux, ils detruisoient tout le païs, et on devoit même craindre, que ce mal ne se communiquât aux provinces voisines. Mais il se présenta alors une belle occasion de delivrer la France de ces pillards ... et lui donna (Charles VIII.) tout ces francs-archers et brigands de Normandie jusqu’au nombre de 3000. Mezeray, T. II. p. 762.
[50] “La milice estoit plus cruelle et plus desordonnée que jamais.” So says Mezeray of the French soldiers in general. T. II. p. 750.
[51] Schiller, Sect. II. c. 1. p. 131. b.
[52] Angelus, p. 253. Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 398. b. The scurvy affected society far more in the 15th and 16th centuries than it does at present, and made its appearance on several occasions as an epidemic. Compare, in particular, Reusner, whose work on the history of epidemics is one of general importance. Sennert, Wier, and others.
[53] Schiller, loc. cit.
[54] It was conceived not to bee an epidemicke disease, but to proceed from a malignity in the constitution of the aire, gathered by the predispositions of seasons: and the speedie cessation declared as much. Bacon, p. 9.
[55] The name passed into the French, English, and Italian languages—Lansquenet, Lancichinecho.
[56] ——“flock together like flies in summer, so that any one would wonder where all these swarms have sprung from, and how they are maintained during the winter; and truly they are such a miserable crew, that one ought rather to pity than envy the kind of life they lead and their precarious fortune.” Franck’s Chronicle. “On the destructive Lansquenets,” fol. 217. b.
[57] 1518. “This year there was a great gathering of the Landsknechts, who, as soon as they had assembled, went forth from Friesland, committed great ravages and made an incursion into the country at Gellern, and were beaten by Vernlow.” Wintzenberger, fol. 23. a.
[58] “Not to mention too the curtailment of life, for one seldom meets with an old Landsknecht.” Franck, loc. cit.
[59] Those Moors were so called who, in order to remain in Spain after the conquest of Granada, embraced Christianity.—Transl. note.
[60] The petechial fever which will be spoken of further on.
[61] Grafton, p. 220. Webster, Vol. I. p. 149.
[62] Stow, p. 809. Fabian, p. 689. Hall, p. 502. Grafton, p. 230. Holinshed, p. 536. Bacon, p. 225.
[63] Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 403. a. Pestilenz, A. 1505.
[64] Webster, Vol. I. p. 151. Franck, fol. 219. a. Pingré, T. I. p. 481.
[65] Bacon, p. 225. Stow, p. 809. Compare the other chroniclers, who most of them notice this event in great detail.
[66] Bacon, p. 231.
[67] Empson and Dudley, ministers of Henry VII., who left behind him treasure to the amount of £1,800,000 sterling. Compare Hume, Hist. of Eng. Vol. III., Bacon, and almost all the chroniclers. Both ministers were executed in the following reign, in the year 1509. Grafton, p. 236.
[68] Villalba, T. I. pp. 69. 99.—Ferdinand’s conflicts with the Saracens began in 1481, and ended with the fall of Granada in 1492. The disease is called in Spanish Tabardillo, which name, however, Villalba has not quoted at so early a period as 1490.
[69] Villalba, loc. cit. p. 66.
[70] Ibid. p. 69—Fracastor, de morbis contagios. L. II. c. 6. p. 155.—Schenck von Grafenberg, L. VI. p. 553. T. II.
[71] Besides those already named, the writings of Omodei and Pfeufer. Compare Schnurrer, Book II. p. 27.
[72] It was called Puncticula or Peticulæ, also Febris stigmatica, Pestis petechiosa. Reusner, p. 11. For later synonimes, see Burserius, Vol. II. p. 293.
[73] Consimilem ergo infectionem in aëre primum fuisse censendum est, quæ mox in nos ingesta tale febrium genus attulerit, quæ tametsi pestilentes veræ non sunt, in limine tamen earum videntur esse. Analogia vero ejus contagionis ad sanguinem præcipue esse constat, quod et maculæ illæ, quæ expelli consuevere, demonstrant, etc. p. 161.
[74] Compare the whole of the sixth and seventh chapters of Fracastor. loc. cit. What was the general judgment of the Italian physicians respecting the spotted fever, may be gathered from Nic. Massa, whose confused work, however, contributes nothing to the history of the disease. Cap. IV. fol. 67, seq. Compare Schenck von Grafenberg’s excellent and very copious treatise, de febre stigmatica. L. VI. p. 553, Tom. II.
[75] Osorio, fol. 113. b., 114. a.
[76] See further on.
[77] Villalba, p. 78, et seq.
[78] Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 402. a. Angelus, p. 261. Pingré, T. I. p. 479.
[79] Compare Webster, who has collected together whatever could be found on this subject. Vol. II. p. 82.
[80] Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 402. a.
[81] The same. Franck, fol. 219. a.
[82] Author’s History of Medicine. Book II. p. 146.
[83] Sigebert. Gembl. fol. 58. a. Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 66. b.
[84] Sigebert. Gembl. fol. 82. a. Hermann. Contract, p. 186. Witichind. p. 34.
[85] Compare on this subject Nees v. Esenbeck’s Supplement to R. Brown’s Miscellaneous Botanical Writings, Book I. p. 571; and Ehrenberg’s New Observations on Blood-like Appearances in Egypt, Arabia, and Siberia, together with a review and critique on what was earlier known, in Poggendorff’s Annalen, 1830; the two best works on this subject; wherein is also contained a criticism on Chladni’s Hypermeteorological Views.
[86] Crusius is the most circumstantial on this point, for he gives the names of many persons on whose clothes crosses were visible. On a maiden’s shawl the instruments of Christ’s martyrdom were supposed to have been seen marked. In the vicinity of Biberach, a miller’s lad made rude sport of the painting of crosses, but he was seized and burned. Book II. p. 156.
[87] Mezeray, T. II. p. 819.
[88] Angelus, p. 261.
[89] Perhaps Sporotrichum vesicarum, or a kind of Mycoderma.
[90] Vincenzo Sette describes a kind of red mould, which in the year 1819 coloured vegetable and animal substances in the province of Padua, and excited superstitious apprehensions among the people. See his work on this subject.
[91] “Autumnali vero tempore, cum jam vestes, lintea, culcitræ, panes, omnis generis obsonia, sub dio, vel in conclavibus patentibus locata talem situ mucorem contraxerunt, qualis oritur in penore, in opacis domus cellis collocato, aut etiam in ipsis cellis diu non repurgatis, pestis præsentes ad nocendum vires habet.” L. I. p. 45. Agricola’s Treatise on the Plague is among the cleverest which the sixteenth century produced.
[92] For example, at the time of the Justinian Plague, and of the Black Death.
[93] Mezeray, T. II. p. 828.
[94] See above, p. 189.
[95] The former mortality was so far from having ceased, yea, rather in the great heat (of summer) was still more vehement, that in some places a third part, and in some even the half of the people were snatched away by death, and that not by one only, but by various and hitherto unheard of diseases. Men caught the burning fever so rapidly and violently, that they thought they must be totally consumed. Some were seized with such severe and insupportable headache that they were deprived of their senses, some with such a violent cough that they expectorated blood incessantly—some with such a very rapid flux, that it broke their hearts: the bodies of some putrefied, and were so offensive that no one could remain near them. And by reason of such extraordinary diseases, it was a most sorrowful and troublous year, and there followed a hard winter, in the which, the cold lasted for three months. Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 402. b. Compare Angelus, p. 263, who, following some contemporaries, mentions a comet (doubted by Pingré, I. 479) as having appeared in the year 1504.
[96] From a Poem on Henry VIII. in Herbert of Cherbury.
[97] They found grazing more profitable, and converted large tracts of arable land into pasture. Hume, T. IV. p. 277.
[98] Lemnius, fol. III. b.
[99] Grafton, p. 294. This insurrection is called by the Chroniclers, “Insurrection of Evill May-day.”—Hume, T. IV. 274.
[100] “Of the common sort they were numberless, that perished by it.” Godwyn, p. 23.
[101] Is valde sibi videbatur adversus contagionem victus moderatione munitus: qua factum putavit, ut quum in nullum pene incideret, cujus non tota familia laboraverat, neminem adhuc e suis id malum attigerit, id quod et mihi et multis præterea jactavit, non admodum multis horis antequam extinctus est.“-Erasm. Epist. L. VII. ep. 4. col. 386. The date of the year of this letter from Sir Thomas More to Erasmus, 1520, is clearly erroneous, as is that of many other letters in this collection, for at that time the Sweating Sickness did not prevail in London; it is also sufficiently well known from other researches (Biographie Universelle—General Biographical Dictionary), that Ammonius died in 1517. The date of the month, however, 19th August, seems to be correct. Sprengel has, in consequence of this false date of the year, been misled to assume a specific epidemic Sweating Sickness as having taken place in the year 1520, (Book II. p. 686,) which is wholly unconfirmed.
[102] Grafton, p. 294, is very detailed. Compare Holinshed, p. 626. Baker, p. 286. Hall, p. 592.
[103] Godwyn, p. 23. Stow, p. 849.
[104] This, from the foregoing remark upon the death of Ammonius, may be concluded with the greatest probability.
[105] —“omnibus fere intra paucos dies decumbentibus, amissis plurimis, optimis atque honestissimis amicis.” Th. More in Erasmus’s Epist. L. VII. ep. 4. col. 386.
[106] Ibid. The only place where the disease is spoken of as having spread across the channel.
[107] Spangenberg. M. Chr. fol. 408. a.
[108] Crusius. T. II. p. 187.
[109] Wintzenberger, fol. 21. a. Angelus, p. 282. Spangenberg, loc. cit. Pingré, T. I. p. 483.
[110] Such was the name given in Germany to the already oft-mentioned pernicious fever with inflammation of the brain. We recognise it for the first time, as an epidemic, in France, in the year 1482. (See above, p. 189.) It frequently made its appearance throughout the whole of the sixteenth century.
[111] Crusius, T. II. p. 187.
[112] On the 16th of June, 1517, there was a great earthquake, and a tremendous storm of wind at Nördlingen, so that the parish church at St. Emeran was completely forced out of the ground and thrown down, and it was reckoned that there were 2000 houses and stables in that place which, for a space of two miles long, were overthrown and rent, and there were few houses there which were not, like the church, damaged and shaken to pieces. Wintzenberger, fol. 21. b.
[113] In Xativa. Villalba, T. I. p. 83.
[114]Il est saoul comme un Angloys.”—Rondelet, de dign. morb. fol. 35. b.
[115] Elyot, in his “Castell of Health,” quoted by Aikin, p. 64. Rondelet, loc. cit.
[116] In 1724, which was a great fruit year, there arose in this very county, from the immoderate use of cyder, an epidemic cholic; the Colica Damnoniorum. Vide Huxham, Opera. (Lips. 1764.) Tom. III. p. 54.
[117] Elyot, in Aikin, p. 63.
[118] Le Grand d’Aussy, T. I. p. 143.
[119] Hume, T. IV. p. 273. Aikin, p. 59.
[120] “Now-a-days, if a boy of seven years of age, or a young man of twenty years, have not two caps on his head, he and his friends will think that he may not continue in health; and yet, if the inner cap be not of velvet or satin, a serving-man feareth to lose his credence.” Elyot, in Aikin, p. 64.
[121] ——“ubi homines perpetuo in hypocaustis degunt, multoque carnium esu se ingurgitant, et alimentis piperatis continuo utuntur. Quare factum est, ut continua hypocaustorum æstuatione meatuum cutis relaxatio consequeretur, quæ sudoris promptissima et potentissima causa esse solet, cuius materia in humorum exsuperantia consistebat, quam frequens alimentorum multum nutrientium et piperatorum usus colligerat.” Rondelet, loc. cit.
[122] The floors of the houses generally are made of nothing but loam, and are strewed with rushes, which being constantly put on fresh, without a removal of the old, remain lying there, in some cases for twenty years, with fish-bones, broken victuals and other filth underneath, and impregnated with the urine of dogs and men. Erasm. Epist. L. xxii. ep. 12. col. 1140. This description is in all probability overdrawn, and applicable only to the poorest huts. It is, however, certainly not fictitious, and is not refuted by Kaye.
[123] Fracastoro, Fernel, Valleriola, Houlier, and most of the other learned physicians of the sixteenth century.
[124] ——“quod, vulgaria diversoria parum tuta sunt a contagio sceleratæ pestis, quæ nuper ab Anglis—in nostras regiones demigravit,” speaking of the English Sweating Sickness in Germany (1529). Erasm. Epist. L. xxvii. ep. 16. col. 1519. c.
[125] Brown’s “Opportunity.”
[126] Erasm. Epist. L. vii. ep. 4. col. 386.
[127] Mezeray, T. II. p. 853. Paré, p. 823. Holler, Comm. II. in secund. sect. Coac. Hippocrat. p. 323.
[128] “Un étrange rhûme qu’on nomma coqueluche, lequel tourmenta toute sorte de personnes, et leur rendit la voix si enrouée, que le barreau et les collèges en furent muets.”—Mezeray. Compare Diderot et d’Alembert, Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des Sciences, etc. T. IV. p. 182.
[129] Pasquier, Livr. IV. Ch. 28, pp. 375, 376. The following is the passage. “En l’an 1411, y eut une autre sorte de maladie, dont une infinité de personnes furent touchez, par laquelle on perdoit le boire, le manger et le dormir, et toutefois et quantes que le malade mangeoit, il auoit une forte fievre; ce qu’il mangeoit luy sembloit amer ou puant, tousiours trembloit, et auec ce estoit si las et rompu de ses membres, que l’on ne l’osoit toucher en quelque part que ce fust: Aussi estoit ce mal accompagné d’une forte toux, qui tourmentoit son homme iour et nuit, laquelle maladie dura trois semaines entieres, sans qu’une personne en mourust. Bien est vray que par la vehemence de la toux plusieurs hommes se rompirent par les genitoires, et plusieurs femmes accoucherent avant le terme. Et quand venoit au guerir, ils iettoient grande effusion de sang par la bouche, le nez et le fondement, sans qu’aucun médecin peust iuger dont procedoit ce mal, sinon d’une generale contagion de l’air, dont la cause leur estoit cachée. Cette maladie fut appellée le Tac: et tel autrefois a souhaité par risée ou imprecation le mal du Tac à son compagnon, qui ne sçavoit pas que c’estoit.—L’an 1427, vers la S. Remy (1. Oct.) cheut un autre air corrompu qui engendra une très mauvaise maladie, que l’on appelloit Ladendo (dit un auteur de ce temps là) e n’y auoit homme ou femme, qui presque ne s’en sentist durant le temps qu’elle dura. Elle commençoit aux reins, comme si on eust eu une forte gravelle, en après venoient les frissons, et estoit en bien huict ou dix iours qu’on ne pouvoit bonnement boire, ne manger, ne dormir. Après ce venoit une toux si mauvaise, que quand on estoit au Sermon, on ne pouvoit entendre ce que le Sermonateur disoit par la grande noise des tousseurs. Item elle eust une très forte durée jusques après la Toussaincts (1. Nov.) bien quinze iours ou plus. Et n’eussiez gueres veu homme ou femme qui n’eust la bouche ou le nez tout esseué de grosse rongne, et s’entre-mocquoit le peuple l’un de l’autre, disant: As tu point eu Ladendo?”
[130] Reusner, p. 75.
[131] Valleriola, Loc. med. Comm. Append. p. 45. Schenck a Grafenberg, Lib. VI. p. 552. Compare Short, T. I. p. 221.
[132] Reusner, p. 72. Some of the synonymes here adduced will shew the medical views of the period respecting these diseases: Catarrhus febrilis. Febris catarrhosa. Ardores suffocantes. Febris suffocativa. Catarrhus epidemicus. Tussis popularis. Cephalæa catarrhosa. Cephalalgia contagiosa. Gravedo anhelosa, Fernel. Der böhmische Ziep (the Bohemian pip). Der Schafhusten (the sheep-cough). Die Schafkrankheit (the sheep disease). Die Lungensucht (phthisis). Das Hühnerweh (the poultry cough, or chicken contracted to chin-cough), and many others. In the influenza of 1580, violent perspiration was occasionally observed, so that some physicians thought that the English sweating sickness was about to return, just as in the Gröninger intermittent (1826), and in the cholera of 1831, without any knowledge on the subject, they talked of the Black Death.—Schneider, L. IV. c. 6. p. 203.
[133] That the physicians of the sixteenth century were familiar with this observation, is proved by the following quotation from Houlier. “Nulla fere corporis humani ægritudo est, quæ non defluxione humoris alicuius e capite aut excitari aut incrementum accipere possit.” Morb. int. L. I. fol. 68. b.
[134] Hvitfeldt, Danmarks Riges Kronike.
[135] Forest, Lib. VI. Obs. IX. p. 159.
[136] Webster, vol. I. p. 157. 165. Villalba, T. I. p. 102. 117., and Schnurrer.
[137] Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 408. b.
[138] Tyengius, in Forest: Lib. VI. Obs. II. Schol. p. 152.
[139] Forest availed himself of the unprinted and probably lost works of this distinguished physician, of whom, but for him, we should have known nothing.
[140] The moderns, who prefer powerful remedies, employ for this purpose, without any better effect, the lunar caustic.
[141] Wurstisen, p. 707. In this seventeenth year there arose an unknown epidemic. The patients’ tongues and gullets were white, as if coated with mould; they could neither eat nor drink, but suffered from headache together with a pestilential fever which rendered them delirious. By this disease 2000 persons perished in Basle within the space of eight months. Besides other means, it was found very efficacious to cleanse the mouth and gullet every two hours, even to the extent of making the surface bleed, and then to soften them with honey of roses.
[142] Bretonneau’s Diphtheritis. Compare Naumann’s treatise on the subject in the author’s Wissenschaftlichen Annalen der ges. Heilkunde, Vol. XXV. II. 3. p. 271.
[143] Forest. Lib. VI. obs. ix. p. 159.
[144] Petr. Martyr. Dec. IV. cap. 10. p. 321. Compare Moore, p. 106.
[145] 24th of Feb. 1525.
[146] Lautrec.
[147] At first under Hugo de Moncada; afterwards under the Prince of Orange.
[148] 1495, the year of the epidemic Lues.
[149] Among them some regiments of Swiss.
[150] Two hundred knights under Sir Robert Jerningham, and afterwards under Carew: both died of the Camp Fever. Herbert of Cherbury, p. 212. seq.
[151] The 6th of May, 1527.
[152] Jovius, L. XXVI. Tom. II. p. 129.
[153] Ibid. p. 114.
[154] According to Mezeray, the pestilence was at its height at the end of July. This is in accordance with Jovius, who fixes the termination of the great mortality, with rather too much precision perhaps, on the 7th of August.
[155] With reference to this seemingly inflammatory state of excitement, it is, perhaps, worthy of notice, that the commander in chief himself is stated to have been twice bled. Jovius, loc. cit. p. 125.
[156] Jovius, loc. cit. p. 116–118.
[157] Mezeray, T. II. p. 963.
[158] Fracastor. Morb. Contag. L. II. c. 6. p. 155, 156.
[159] It broke out in the beginning of February, and prevailed throughout the following month. Campo, p. 151.
[160] Guicciardini, p. 1054.
[161] Mezeray, T. II. p. 957.
[162] Guicciardini, p. 1276.
[163] Ibid. p. 1315.
[164] See above, p. 201.
[165] It was also observed, as is well known, in the summer of 1831, before the breaking out of the cholera.
[166] Gratiol. p. 129, 130.
[167] See above, p. 204.
[168] Jovius, loc. cit. p. 115.
[169] Mezeray, p. 963.
[170] The Spanish name for the lues venerea, which it obtained in consequence of the prevailing eruptions. It corresponds with the French “la vérole,” and with the German “französische Pocken.” We must not, therefore, think that it means “buboes.” Sandoval, Part II. pp. 12. 14. Compare Astruc, T. I. p. 4.
[171] In the Madrid edition of the same work, 1675. fol. L. XVII. p. 232. b.
[172] “Auster namque ventus per eos dies perflare et mortiferum crassioris nebulæ vaporem ex palustri ortum uligine, per castra dissipare et circumferre ita cœperat, ut aliis ex causis conceptæ febres in contagiosum morbum verterentur.” Jovius, L. XXVI. p. 127.
[173] In Torgau where, in 1813 and 1814, 30,000 Frenchmen found their graves, there prevailed two diseases, typhus and diarrhœa, altogether distinct from one another. See Richter.
[174] Schwelin, p. 143.
[175] See page 189.
[176] Trousser, in an obsolete sense, signifies to cause speedy death.
[177] Mezeray, T. II. p. 965, where the best notices of it are to be found.
[178] His account applies to the town of Puy in the Auvergne, where he seems himself to have seen the disease. Livr. XXII. c. 5. p. 823.
[179] Forest. L. VI. obs. 7. p. 156. Sander writes from numerous observations which he made in and about Cambray.
[180] Sauvages, T. I. p. 487, hence calls the Trousse-galant “Cephalitis verminosa,” although neither inflammation of the brain nor worms existed in all cases, and takes his description from Sander, as again Ozanam has taken it from Sauvages, T. III. p. 27.
[181] Forest. p. 157. Schol.
[182] Paré, loc. cit.
[183] So small-pox and measles, it is well known, are the forerunners of plague.
[184] Fabian, p. 699.
[185] Sir William Compton, and William Carew, besides many other distinguished persons who are not named.
[186] Grafton, p. 412, the principal passage. Compare Holinshed, p. 735. Baker, p. 293. Hall, p. 750. Herbert of Cherbury, p. 215.
[187] During Henry the Eighth’s reign (1509 to 1547), 72,000 malefactors were, according to Harrison, executed for theft and robbery, making nearly 2000 for each year. Hume, T. IV. p. 275.
[188] Stow, p. 885.
[189] Fabian, loc. cit.
[190] ——“it seeming to be but the same contagion of the aire, varied according to the clime.” Herbert of Cherbury, loc. cit.
[191] Stow, loc. cit.
[192] Campo, pp. 150, 151.
[193] Grafton, p. 431. Wagenaar, Vol. II. p. 516.
[194] Haftitz, p. 130.
[195] Annales Berolino-Marchici, (no numbers to the pages.)
[196] Magnus Hundt, fol. 4. b., and many others.
[197] Bonn, p. 143. A girl in Lübeck died of fright at this meteor.
[198] Haftitz. p. 131. Angelus, p. 317.
[199] It must not be thought that the author, because he has brought forward these notices, has any pre-formed opinions whatever respecting the import of these heavenly bodies. The historian cannot pass over contemporaneous occurrences, whatever may be the conclusion which the limited extent of our knowledge enables us to draw from them.
[200] Pingré, T. I. p. 485. Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 410. a.
[201] Pingré, p. 486. Angelus, p. 318. Crusius, Vol. II. p. 223.
[202] Pingré, p. 487. Campo, p. 154. Angelus, p. 320, and numerous other accounts. It performs its revolution in 76 years, and was observed in 1456, 1531, 1607, 1682, and 1759.
[203] Pingré, p. 491. Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 433. b.
[204] Pingré, p. 496. Angelus, p. 322. Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 435. a.
[205] Erfurt Chronicle. Spangenberg, who has availed himself frequently of this chronicle, makes use of the same words, M. Chr. fol. 431. b.
[206] They called the sour wine of this year den Wiedertäufer-Wein; the Anabaptist wine. Schwelin, p. 144.
[207] Crusius, Vol. II. p. 323. St. Vitus’s day is on the 15th of June. On the river Neckar, at Heidelberg, they took out a child which had floated down the stream in its cradle unharmed for a distance of six (German) miles. Franck, fol. 252. b.
[208] Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 432. a.
[209] Klemzen, p. 254.
[210] Schwelin, p. 144. Newenar, fol. 69. a. “fecit tamen huius anni, ac fortasse etiam præcedentium intemperies, fluminum exundationes, frigora cum humiditate perpetuo coniuncta, ut jam in Germania Britannicus quidam aër suscitatus videri possit.” Similar accounts are met with in almost all the chronicles.
[211] Leuthinger, p. 90. see “Scriptorum,” etc.
[212] Compare Autenrieth’s excellent work on this subject.
[213] Schiller, sect. I. cap. 2. fol. 3. b.
[214] Franck, fol. 243. b.
[215] Basle among others was particularly distinguished. Stettler, part II. p. 34.
[216] Spangenberg, loc. cit.
[217] Leuthinger, p. 89.
[218] From Whitsuntide till towards St. James’s day, the 25th of July. Klemzen, p. 254.
[219] Two masters of vessels, who had quitted the helm from a sudden attack of this kind, were in danger of grounding upon the Mole. Their situation was, however, noticed, and they were saved. Klemzen.
[220] Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 432. a.
[221] Ibid. fol. 433. a. 435. b. Schwelin, pp. 149, 150.
[222] A Chronicler of the Marches even assures us that it lasted until 1546. Annales Berol. Marchic: but the other contemporary writers contradict this.
[223] Spangenberg, fol. 432. a.
[224] Newenar indeed maintains that the Sweating Fever used to break out in England every year, fol. 68. b., but such general and unsupported assertions coming from foreigners (the Graf Hermann von Newenar was provost of Cologne) are wholly unworthy of credence.
[225] About the 25th of July.
[226] From St. James’s day, the 25th of July, until the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary on the 15th of August. Staphorst.
[227] It appears, for instance, somewhere in the second volume of Leibnitz, Scriptores rerum Brunsvicensium, that 8000 people had died of the Sweating Fever in Hamburgh. An unknown Chronicler in Staphorst, Part II vol. I. p. 85, states 2000.
[228] “Moreover in the year 1529, about St. James’s day, Almighty God sent a terrible disease upon the city of Hamburgh; it was the Sweating Sickness, which showed itself in a different manner, and began when Captain Hermann Evers came from England on St. James’s day with many young companions, of whom, in the course of two days, twelve died of this disease, which was unknown as well in Hamburgh as in other countries, so that the oldest person did not recollect to have seen a similar disease.” An unknown eye-witness, quoted in Staphorst, Part II. Vol. I. p. 83. Another person expresses himself to the same effect, p. 85. “The disease had its origin in England, for the people were there attacked in the street when they came on shore, and those who came in contact with them, many of whom were of the lower class, took it.” Notices of uncertain date to be found in Adelung, at p. 77. Steltzner, Part II. p. 219. In the abbrev. Hamb. Chron. p. 45, and elsewhere.
[229] “As soon as the ship arrived in Hamburgh people began to die throughout the city, and in the morning it was rumoured that four persons had died of it.” From Reimar Koch’s MS. Chron. of Lübeck. For the extract from it the author is indebted to the kindness of Professor Ackermann of Lübeck.
[230] Klemzen, p. 254. It was thought that the waters of the Baltic were poisoned.
[231] Reimar Kock’s Chronicle of Lübeck.
[232] “In the year 1529, this violent disease passed in a very short time all over Germany, and in Lübeck many of its most distinguished citizens died on the vigil of St. Peter in Vinculis.” Regkman, p. 135. Compare Kirchring, p. 143. Bonn, p. 144.
[233] Reimar Kock.
[234] Schmidt, p. 307.
[235] See above, p. 243; and Klemzen, p. 254.
[236] Euric. Cordus.
[237] Gruner, It. p. 23.
[238] Namely, on the Tuesday after the Beheading of John the Baptist (29th Aug.), which fell on a Sunday, for S. Ægidius was on the Wednesday. The dates are given throughout according to Pilgrim’s Calendarium chronologicum.
[239] Klemzen, p. 255.
[240] Curicke, p. 271.
[241] Kronica der Preussen, fol. 191. b.
[242] Stettler, II. p. 33.
[243] In Gratorol. fol. 74. b.
[244] Gruner, It. p. 25, according to MS. Chronicles.
[245] Franck, fol. 253. a.
[246] By Joseph Franck, in the latest edition of his Praxeos Medicæ Universæ Præcepta. Compare Gruner, It. p. 28.
[247] Klemzen, p. 254.
[248] This appears from a letter of Euricius Cordus to the Hessian private secretary, Joh. Rau von Nordeck, at the end of the 2d edition of his Regimen.
[249] Magnus Hundt closed his on the 7th October.
[250] Bayer von Elbogen, cap. 7.
[251] It was called there the Ingelsche Sweetsieckte, or the Sweating Sickness.
[252] Forest. L. VI. Obs. VII. Schol. p. 157. Obs. VIII. c. Schol. p. 158. Wagenaar, T. II. p. 508.
[253] Pontan. p. 762. Haraeus, T. I. p. 581. Antwerpsch Chronykje, p. 31. Ditmar, p. 473.
[254] “Laquelle (sa suette) s’estendit par le pays d’Oostlande, de Hollande, Zeelande, et autres des pays bas, on en étoit endedens vingt et quatre heures mort ou guarry, elle ne dura in Zeelande pour le plus que 15 jours, dont plusieurs en moururent.” Le Petit, T. I. Livr. VII. p. 81.
[255] Forest, loc. cit.
[256] Erasm. Epist. Lib. XXVI. ep. 58. col. 1477. b. At Zerbst the Sweating Fever lasted, in like manner, only five days. Gruner, It. p. 29.
[257] It was called there “den engelske Sved.”
[258] Frederick I. Histor. p. 181. The same words in Huitfeld, T. II. p. 1315.
[259] Boesens Beskrivelse over Helsingöer. For this statement the author has to thank Dr. Mansa, regimental physician at Copenhagen.
[260] Dr. Baden, D. C. L., took much pains, at the request of Gruner, in making researches, but has elicited nothing more than Huitfeld has given. A copy of his Latin letter to Gruner on this subject, has likewise reached the author through Dr. Mansa.
[261] Dalin, D. III. p. 221. Engelske Svetten. In Tegel’s History of king Gustavus I. Part I. p. 267, general notices only are to be found respecting the English Sweating Sickness in Sweden, without any exact date (autumn of 1529) or description of the disease, such as are met with without number in the German Chronicles. Sven Hedin clearly estimates the mortality in the epidemic sweating fever too highly, when he compares it, p. 27, with the depopulation caused by the Black Death. He gives (p. 47) a striking passage on the Sweating Sickness from Linneus’s pathological prælections. The great naturalist has, however, allowed free scope to his imagination, and, like all the physicians of modern times who have delivered their sentiments on the English Sweating Sickness, knows far too little of the facts to be able to form a right judgment on the subject. (Supplement till Handboken för Praktiska Läkare-vetenskapen, rörande epidemiska och smittosamma sjukdomar i allmänhet, och särdeles de Pestilentialiska. 1 sta St. Stockholm, 1805. 8vo.)
[262] From Reimar Kock’s MS. Chronicle of Lübeck, and Forest, loc. cit. Compare Gruner’s Itinerarium, which is prepared throughout with laudable and even tedious diligence, but which met with so little acknowledgment in the Brunonian age, that it has already become a rare work.
[263] “According to which it was given out by some, that a sweat must be kept up for twenty-four hours in succession, and in the mean time, that no air should be admitted to the patient. This treatment sent many to their graves.”—Erfurt Chronicle.
[264] Erfurt Chronicle, and in the same strain Spangenberg, M. Chr. fol. 402. b. Pomarius, p. 617. and Schmidt, p. 305. Gemma writes of the Netherlands, L. I. c. 8. p. 189, having received his account from his father, who was himself the subject of the Sweating Sickness: “Consuti (sewn up) et violenter operti clamitabant misere, obtestabantur Deum atque hominum fidem, sese dimitterent, se suffocari iniectis molibus, sese vitam in summis angustiis exhalare, sed assistentes has querelas ex rabie proficisci, medicorum opinione persuasi, urgebant continue usque ad 24 horas,” etc.
[265] Schmidt, loc. cit.
[266] ——“Animos omnium terrore perculit adeo ut multis metus et imaginatio morbum conciliarit.Erasm. Epist. L. XXVI. ep. 56. c. 1476. a. Spangenberg, loc. cit.
[267] “Many an one sweats for fear and thinks he has the English sweat, and when he afterwards hath slept it off, acknowledges that it was all nonsense.” Bayer v. Elbogen, cap. 8.
[268] The author could adduce some extraordinary instances of this kind which have occurred in his own practice.
[269] It was a greengrocer in Paris. Berliner Vossische Zeitung, Sept. 2, 1833.
[270] Carlstadt, Nic. Storch, Marcus Thomii, Marus Stubner, Marlin Cellarius and Thomas Münzer.
[271] “For all love hath grown cold in all nations; the axe lieth at the root of the tree, the rope is already applied, no one observeth it. For the world is stricken with thick blindness, faith is extinguished. All singleness and Godly fear hath withdrawn from the land for ever, and nothing but false hypocritical make-believe work is to be found among the Baptists, and at most a false, fictitious, fruitless, dead, tottering faith in the other sects, and yet the world thinks, notwithstanding, that she sees and sits in light. In short, for the one devil of the Baptists whom she has driven out, she is beset with seven more subtle and wickeder spirits, though she think that she be freed, and that they all be gone forth.” Franck, fol. 248, a. This same Chronicle contains a very lively description of the Peasant-war.
[272] Ad. Clarenbach and Peter Flistedt.
[273] Schmidt, p. 308.
[274] Nusquam pax, nullum iter tutum est, rerum charitate, penuria, fame, pestilenti laboratur ubique, sectis dissecta sunt omnia: ad tantam malorum lernam accessit letali sudor, multos intra horas octo tolleus e medio, etc. Erasm. Epist. L. XXVI. ep. 58. c. 1477. b.
[275] Fuhrmann, Part II. p. 745.
[276] Chronicon Monasterii Mellicensis. In Pez, T. I. col. 285.
[277] The Assembly of the Reformers began there on the 2nd of October.
[278] The pamphlet written by Magnus Hundt is ornamented with a wood-cut, where, under the throne of God, and seated on lions who are spitting forth fire, a great host of angels, armed with swords, are hovering round men, whom they treat worse than Herod’s soldiers treated the children of Bethlehem.
[279] Reimar Kock’s Chronicle of Lübeck.
[280] Kersenbroick in Sprengel, II. p. 687. Compare Sleidan, L. VI. Tom. I. p. 380, who plainly and simply states the fact.
[281] Culpam eius rei plerique conferebant in theologos concionatores, qui suppliciis impiorum placandam esse clamabant iram Dei, novo morbi genere nos verberantis. Sleidan, loc. cit. p. 380.
[282] Haftitz, p. 131. Angelus, p. 319. Cramer, Book III. p. 76, and many others.
[283] “Verum quamplurimi, tam nobiles quam populares viri ac mulieres, hoc morbo misere suffocati sunt, ob libellos erroneos, ab indoctissimis hominibus in vulgus emissos, qui in eiusmodi lue curanda peritiam et experientiam jactabant, multosque in Angliâ aliisque regionibus sese curasse dicebant, cum omnia falsa essent. Tales inquam minima pietate fulti erga ægrotos, illorum loculos tantum expilabant, ac in sui commodum convertebant, nullam de aliorum damnis nec morte ipsa curam gerentes, sed quæ sua sunt tantum curantes, nulla arte instructi miseros ægros, passim sua ignorantia trucidabant.” Forest. L. VI. obs. 8. p. 158. a.
[284] “Ditissimi negociatores, lectis adfixi medicos ad se vocabant, montes auri promittentes, si curarentur.” Ditmar, p. 473.
[285] “Nam occlusis rimis omnibus, et excitato igne copioso, opertisque stragulis, quo magis tutiusque suderent, æstu præfocati sunt.” Forest. loc. cit. p. 157. b.
[286] Wild, in Baldinger, p. 278.
[287] The printer Frantz. Schmidt, p. 307.
[288] Stelzner, Part II. p. 219.
[289] This appears from the Wittenberg regimen.
[290] Reimar Kock’s Chronicle of Lübeck.
[291] Klemzen, p. 255.
[292] In Gratoroli: Petrus, proto medicus, fol. 90.
[293] See his pamphlet.
[294]

I here give the whole pamphlet, which only occupies five pages. It is entitled, “The Remedy, Advice, Succour and Consolation against the dreadful, and as yet by us Germans unheard-of, speedy, and mortal Disease, called the English Sweating Sickness, from which may Almighty God mercifully protect us.”

I’m sharing the entire pamphlet, which only takes up five pages. It’s titled, “The Remedy, Advice, Support, and Comfort Against the Terrible and, as of yet, Unheard-of Speedy and Deadly Disease, Known as the English Sweating Sickness, From Which Almighty God May Mercifully Protect Us.”

“When the disease and sweating sets in, ask what o’clock it is, and note it. “If any one be afflicted with this pestilence (may God protect us from it!) it attacks him either with heat or with cold, and he will sweat violently; and this will take place all over his body. Some take the disease with sudden eructations, and do not sweat; and to those who do not sweat, a flower of mace with warm beer is given, and then they sweat.

“When the disease and sweating starts, ask what time it is and take note of it. “If anyone is affected by this plague (may God protect us from it!), it will hit them either with heat or cold, and they will sweat profusely; this will happen all over their body. Some people get the illness with sudden burps and do not sweat; for those who don’t sweat, a flower of mace mixed with warm beer is given, and then they start to sweat.

“But if the pestilence and disease, from which may God preserve us! attack any one after he has lain down in bed, he must be left there; but if he has a feather bed, though a thin one, over him, cut it open and take the feathers out, that it may consist only of the ticking or covering. If it be too thin, add a cool coverlet, and let the patient lie under that, covered up to the neck, and take care that the air do not touch or strike upon his breast, or under his arms, and the soles of his feet, and let him not toss about.

“But if the plague and disease, may God protect us from it! attack someone after they’ve gone to bed, they must be left there; but if they have a feather bed, even if it’s thin, cut it open and take the feathers out so that it’s just the ticking or covering. If it’s too thin, add a cool blanket, and let the patient lie under that, covered up to the neck, making sure that the air doesn’t touch their chest, under their arms, or the soles of their feet, and make sure they don’t toss and turn.”

“Item. Two men should attend the patient, to prevent him from uncovering himself, and from going to sleep.

“Item. Two men should watch over the patient to keep him from exposing himself and from falling asleep.”

“Item. The same two men must watch the patient, and guard him against sleeping: if they neglect this, and do not so prevent him, and the patient sleep, he will lose his senses, and go raving mad.

“Item. The same two men must keep an eye on the patient and make sure he doesn't fall asleep: if they ignore this and let him sleep, he will lose his sanity and go completely mad."

“In order, however, that he may be prevented from sleeping, take a little rosewater, and by means of a sponge or clean napkin, bathe his temples with it between the eyes and the ears, and by means of a sponge or napkin, apply pungent wine or beer vinegar to his nose, and talk constantly to him so that he fall not asleep.

“In order to keep him from falling asleep, take some rosewater and, using a sponge or clean cloth, wipe his temples between his eyes and ears. Then, with the sponge or cloth, apply some strong wine or beer vinegar to his nose, and keep talking to him so he doesn't drift off.”

“If he would drink, give him a thin beverage, which should be a little warm; and he ought not to be given more than two spoonfuls at a time.

“If he wants to drink, give him a light beverage that's slightly warm; and he shouldn't be given more than two spoonfuls at a time."

“Item. On the patient’s head should be placed a linen night-cap, and a woollen one over it.

“Item. A linen nightcap should be placed on the patient's head, and a woolen one over it."

“Item. A warm towel should be taken, and with it the sweat wiped from the face.

“Item. A warm towel should be taken, and with it the sweat wiped from the face.”

“Item. Whoever is attacked in the day-time must be put to bed: if it be a man, in his stockings and breeches; if a woman, in her clothes; and let them be covered over with not more than two thin coverings; and, above all things, no feather bed; and then treat them as above written.

“Item. Anyone who is attacked during the day must be put to bed: if it's a man, in his socks and trousers; if it's a woman, in her clothes; and they should be covered with no more than two light blankets; and, above all, no feather bed; and then treat them as previously mentioned.”

“Item. The disease attacks most people from great dread and from irregular living, from which a man should guard himself with great pains.

“Item. The disease affects many people due to overwhelming fear and unhealthy habits, which one should protect oneself from with great effort.”

“Once for all, the patient must not have his own way; what he would have you do for him, that must not be done.

“Once and for all, the patient should not get his way; what he wants you to do for him, that must not be done."

“Item. With respect to those whom it attacks in the night, and who lie naked, if they will not lie still, let them be sewn up in the sheets, and let the sheets be sewn to the bed, so that no air can come from beneath; and then cover them as before.

“Item. Regarding those it attacks at night, and who are lying exposed, if they will not stay still, let them be sewn up in the sheets, and let the sheets be sewn to the bed, so that no air can come from underneath; and then cover them as before.”

“Summa. Whoever can thus endure for twenty-four hours, by the blessing of God, will be cured of the sickness, and get well.

“Summa. Whoever can endure this for twenty-four hours, with God's blessing, will be cured of the illness and will recover.”

“If a man has held out for twenty-four hours, let him be taken up, and wrapped in a warm sheet lest he become cold, and throw something over his feet, and bring him to the fire; and above all things, let him not go into the air for four days, and let him avoid much and cold drink.

“If a man has held out for twenty-four hours, have him lifted up, wrapped in a warm blanket to prevent him from getting cold, cover his feet, and bring him to the fire; and above all, he should not go outside for four days, and he should avoid drinking too much and anything cold.”

“If he would sleep, provided twenty-four hours have been passed, let him sleep freely; and may God preserve him!

“If he wants to sleep, as long as twenty-four hours have passed, let him sleep freely; and may God protect him!

“The Lord is Almighty over us! Amen.”

“The Lord is all-powerful over us! Amen.”

The place of publication is wanting. It was, probably, either Leipzig or Wittenberg.

The place of publication is missing. It was likely either Leipzig or Wittenberg.

[295] Magnus Hundt, fol. 27. a. “Nullis vero aliis medicamentis utuntur adversus ipsam, quam expectatione sudoris, nam quibus advenit, omnes fere evadunt, quibus autem retinctur, maxima pars perit.” Forest. loc. cit. p. 159. a. Schol.
[296] Born about 1483; died 1549.
[297] Born 1492; died 1555.
[298] Died 1558.
[299] Died 1545. “Vir gravis; eximia litterarum cognitione, singulari judicio, summa experientia, et prudenti consilio Doctor.” Aikin, p. 47.
[300] In Henry VIII.
[301] See their biography, in Aikin.
[302]

Thomas Gale’s description of this class of medical practitioners gives the best notion of their abilities. “I remember,” says he, “when I was in the wars at Montreuil, (1544,) in the time of that most famous Prince, Henry VIII., there was a great rabblement there, that took upon them to be surgeons. Some were sow gelders, and some horse gelders, with tinkers and cobblers. This noble sect did such great cures, that they got themselves a perpetual name; for like as Thessalus’ sect were called Thessalions, so was this noble rabblement, for their notorious cures, called dog-leaches; for in two dressings they did commonly make their cures whole and sound for ever, so that they neither felt heat nor cold, nor no manner of pain after. But when the Duke of Norfolk, who was then general, understood how the people did die, and that of small wounds, he sent for me and certain other surgeons, commanding us to make search how these men came to their death, whether it were by the grievousness of their wounds, or by the lack of knowledge of the surgeons, and we, according to our commandment, made search through all the camp, and found many of the same good fellows which took upon them the names of surgeons, not only the names, but the wages also. We asking of them whether they were surgeons or no, they said they were; we demanded with whom they were brought up, and they, with shameless faces, would answer, either with one cunning man, or another, which was dead. Then we demanded of them what chirurgery stuff they had to cure men withal; and they would show us a pot or a box, which they had in a budget, wherein was such trumpery as they did use to grease horses’ heels withal, and laid upon scabbed horses’ backs, with verval and such like. And others that were cobblers and tinkers, they used shoemakers’ wax, with the rust of old pans, and made therewithal a noble salve, as they did term it. But in the end this worthy rabblement was committed to the Marshalsea, and threatened by the Duke’s Grace to be hanged for their worthy deeds, except they would declare the truth, what they were and of what occupations, and in the end they did confess, as I have declared to you before.”

Thomas Gale’s description of this group of medical practitioners gives the best idea of their skills. “I remember,” he says, “when I was at war in Montreuil (1544), during the time of the famous Prince, Henry VIII., there was a huge crowd there that claimed to be surgeons. Some were animal castrators, and some were horse castrators, along with tinkers and cobblers. This noble group performed such impressive cures that they earned themselves a lasting reputation; just as Thessalus' followers were called Thessalions, this remarkable crowd was known for their notorious cures as dog-leaches; for in just two treatments they commonly made their patients completely healthy, so that they felt neither heat nor cold, nor any pain afterward. But when the Duke of Norfolk, who was the general at that time, learned how people were dying, even from minor wounds, he called for me and several other surgeons, commanding us to investigate how these men met their deaths, whether it was due to the severity of their wounds or the lack of knowledge of the surgeons. Following our orders, we searched through the entire camp and found many of those same good fellows who took upon themselves the title of surgeons, not just the title but the pay as well. When we asked them if they were surgeons, they claimed they were; we then asked who they had trained with, and they would shamelessly respond, either naming some skilled person who was already dead. We then asked them what surgical tools they had to treat people, and they would show us a pot or a box they carried with them, containing such junk that they used to grease horse hooves and to treat scabbed horse backs, with verval and similar substances. The others, who were cobblers and tinkers, used shoemakers' wax mixed with the rust from old pans, claiming that they made a noble salve. In the end, this worthy group was sent to the Marshalsea and threatened by the Duke’s Grace with hanging for their remarkable deeds, unless they revealed the truth about who they were and what their occupations were, and in the end, they did confess, as I have already told you.”

In another place Gale says, “I have, myself, in the time of King Henry VIII., holpe to furnish out of London, in one year, which served by sea and land, three score and twelve surgeons, which were good workmen, and well able to serve, and all English men. At this present day there are not thirty-four, of all the whole company, of Englishmen, and yet the most part of them be in noblemen’s service, so that if we should have need, I do not know where to find twelve sufficient men. What do I say? sufficient men: nay, I would there were ten amongst all the company, worthy to be called surgeons.”

In another place, Gale says, “Back in the time of King Henry VIII, I helped supply London with, in one year, seventy-two skilled surgeons who were competent and capable, and all were English. These days, there aren't even thirty-four Englishmen in the entire group, and most of them are serving noblemen, so if we needed help, I wouldn't know where to find twelve qualified men. What am I saying? Qualified men? I wish there were even ten in the whole group worthy of being called surgeons.”

[303] Klemzen, p. 255.
[304] Part I. cap. 8.
[305] Gruner, Script, p. 11.
[306] “Vix malevolorum cachinnos morsusque præteriit.” Schiller, Epist. nuncupator. the title which Gruner, Script. p. 12, gives to the original work, still existing in the library at Strasburg, and a Latin extract from it. Gratoroli, fol. 39.
[307] See the Catalogue in the Appendix, “Ein Regiment,” &c.
[308] Any kind of weak beer with the chill off. Warm beer was a beverage in general use in the north of Germany. The beer of Eimbeck and Bernau was stronger, and was recommended by medical men during the convalescence.
[309] “I had in my house seven lying ill with the same disease, of which, thank God, none died.” From the letter of an inhabitant of Hamburgh, given in the same pamphlet, “Ein Regiment,” &c.
[310] Gratorol. fol. 87. b.
[311] Gratorol. fol. 90.
[312] Stettler, Part II. p. 33.
[313] Wagenaar, op. cit. p. 509.
[314] His proper name was Henry Spaten, (German Spät, in English late,) whereof Cordus (the last born or late-born) seems to have been a translation.
[315] The second of September.
[316] ℞ Pulveris cardiaci, (very complex, containing precious stones and many other ingredients,) Ʒij; Pulveris cornu cervi Ʒj; Seminis Santonici, Myrrhæ, aā Ʒſs ♏️. ft. Pulv. Sumt. Ʒj; in warm wine-vinegar.
[317] Chronicle, p. 473.
[318] Born 1505; died 1577.
[319] It is the Electuarium liberans Gasseri:—℞ Spec. liberant. Galen, Spec. de gemm. aā Ʒj, Pulveris Dictamn., Tormentill, Serpentinæ, aā ℈iv, Pimpinell. Zedoariæ. aā Ʒſs, Bol. Armen, lot.; Terr. sigillat. aā ℈ij Rasur. Cornu cervin. ℈j, Zingiber. Ʒſs, Conserv. Rosar, rec. ℥ſs, Theriac. veteris ℥j, Syrup. acetositatis citri. q. s. ut ft. electuar. spiss.—Velsch, p. 19.—Gasser states in his Augsburg Chronicle, that there were more than 3000 cases of the disease there, but that not more than 600 died. See Mencken, Scriptores rerum Germanicarum.
[320] Gratorol. fol. 74. b.
[321] Gratorol. fol. 85. Probably this epistle does not differ essentially from the Latin work of this author on the sweating fever which appeared separately. (De hydrant fever Your sweat-inducing fever treatment Book. Cologne, 1529. 4.)
[322] Gratorol. fol. 64.
[323] Gratorol. fol. 69. b.
[324] Videmus, quam multi de sudore convalescant, fol. 66. a.
[325] This town is called in Flemish Tienen, (Thenæ in Montibus,) translated by Damianus Decicopolis.
[326] Fol. 117. a.
[327] Fol. 109. a.
[328] Fol. 116. b.
[329] Fol. 118. a. Damianus wrote his, by no means unimportant, treatise, during the prevalence of the epidemic sweating fever in Ghent.
[330] He styles himself Schiller von Herderen, from an estate in the village of that name close to Freiburg.
[331] Schiller says with great naïveté, “that the symptoms of the disease are evident, and that those which he has not indicated must be imagined.” Sect. II. c. 1. fol. 206.
[332] "Illness has inconsistent symptoms." Schiller. “Various approaches are taken.” Damian. fol. 115. b.
[333] See above, the remedium, p. 267, note e. Sudoris absentia plurimum nocebat.—Forest. p. 158. Schol.
[334] See above, p. 245. Klemzen, p. 254.
[335] Bayer, cap. 6. M. Hundt, fol. 5. a.
[336] Bayer, loc. cit.
[337] Angelus, p. 319. Schiller, Stettler, locis cit.: and many others.
[338] Damian. fol. 115. b.
[339] Schiller, loc. cit.
[340] The Regimen of Wittenberg.
[341] Damian. fol. 115. b.
[342] Klemzen, p. 255.
[343] “Ungues potissimum excruciat, alas ita comprimit, ut etiam si velis, non posses attollere.” Forest. p. 157. Schol. “In extremitatibus puncturis retorquentur dolorosis—extremitates obstupefiunt, dolet orificium ventriculi, nervorum contractiones nascuntur, plantarum pedumque dolores.”—Damian. fol. 116. a.
[344] Damian. loc. cit.
[345] Klemzen, loc. cit.
[346] “Nec quenquam vidimus ita delirantem restitutum incolumitati.”—Damian. fol. 116. a.
[347] Schiller, Stettler.
[348] Somnolentia et inevitabilis sopor, Schiller; a deep sleep, in almost all the chroniclers.
[349] Schiller.
[350] “Aliis mox tument manus et pedes, aliis facies, quæ et in pluribus livet; nonnullis sola labia et superciliorum loca: mulieribus etiam inguina inflantur.”—Damian. fol. 116. a.
[351] “Maximus denique calor haud procul a corde sentitur, qui ad cerebrum devolans delirium adducit, internecionis nuncium.”—Damian. loc. cit.
[352] Damian. loc. cit.
[353] Schiller, loc. cit.
[354] “Primo insultu aliis cervices aut scapulas, aliis crus aut brachium occupavit,” p. 15. Kaye does not state what he precisely means by this “occupare.” From an analogous more modern observation, it appears, however, that by it are meant tearing rheumatic pains. “Add to this, that the patients complained one and all, some more some less, of a tearing pain in the neck.” Sinner, p. 10.
[355] Pulsus concitatior, frequentior. The only remark upon the pulse which is to be found in all the writers. Caius, p. 16. Probably most of the physicians were afraid of contagion, and, on this account, omitted to examine the pulse.
[356] Page 252.
[357] Odoris teterrimi. Tyengius in Forest., p. 158.
[358] Newenar, fol. 72. b.
[359] Page 190.
[360] Schiller, Kaye, loc. cit.
[361] —— “cum alvi solutione ac lotii haud modica eiectione, in ea morbi specie, quæ curatum itura est.” Damian. fol. 116. a.
[362] Rondelet, de dignosc. morbis, loc. cit.
[363] To avoid exposure to cold, they preferred allowing the patient to pass his evacuations in bed. Bed-pans were unknown. Kaye, p. 110, and most of the other writers.
[364] Tyengius in Forest., p. 158. b. “Febrem sudor finiebat, post se relinquens in extremitatibus corporis, pustulas parvas, admodum exasperantes diversas et malignas secundum humorum malignitatem.”
[365] When care was not taken that the hands and feet were kept under the clothes they died, and their bodies became as black as a coal all over, and were covered with vesicles, and stunk so, that it was necessary to bury them deep in the earth by reason of the stench. Staphorst, Part II. Vol. I. p. 83.
[366] Spots, (maculæ quas ronchas (?) vocant,) which were on other occasions considered as signs of approaching death, or which did not come out until death had occurred, broke out, after a return of sweating which had been repressed, all over the body of the learned Margaretha Roper, the eldest daughter of Thomas More, who was the subject of sweating fever in 1517 or 1528, and recovered. Th. Stapleton, Vita et obitus Thomæ Mori, c. 6, p. 26. See Mori Opera.
[367] And certainly only after very appropriate and careful treatment. See the Wittenberg Regimen, Kaye, loc. cit. Schmidt, p. 307, and Klemzer, p. 256.
[368] Newenar, fol. 72. b.
[369] Erasm. Epist. L. XXVI. Ep. 58. p. 1477. b. “Et crebro quos reliquit brevi intervallo repetens, nec id semel, sed bis, ter, quater, donec in hydropem aut aliud morbi genus versus, tandem extinguat miseris excarnificatum modis.”
[370] Kaye, p. 110.
[371] Idem. p. 113.
[372] Staphorst, Part II. vol. I. p. 83.
[373] “Immunes erant pueri et senes ab hoc malo.” Ditmar, p. 473. “Pueri infra decem annos rarissime hac febre corripiuntur.” Newenar, fol. 72. a. “Senibus solis quandoque pepercit,—præternavigavit etiam magna ex parte atrabilarios et emaciatos corpore, quoniam et horum corpora putris succi expertia erant.” Schiller, fol. 4. a.
[374] Schmidt, p. 307.
[375] As for instance, Schiller, to name but one among thousands. “Juvit etiam auxitque malum frequens multaque crapula, et in potationibus otiosa vita nostra,” fol. 3. b.
[376] Let it be observed under similar circumstances. It ought not to be affirmed that they are free from rheumatic diseases, but only that they are less disposed to be affected by them.
[377] That a rheumatic state makes the body an isolator, A. von Humboldt discovered as early as 1793, and he found that the observation was confirmed by subsequent experiments. “I have observed in myself that, when labouring under a severe attack of catarrhal fever, I was unable, by the most powerful metals, to excite the galvanic flash before my eyes; that I interrupted every connecting link between the muscular and nervous apparatus. As the rheumatic malady lessens the irritability of organs, so also it seems to diminish their conducting power. How is this? As yet nothing is known about it. I have every now and then met with isolating persons who were in perfect health, but can we not yet, amidst such an ocean of uncertainty, discover a condition by which we may determine every case?” Versuche in Vol. I. p. 159. Pfaff believes that, during the existence of rheumatic diseases, the proper electricity of the body sinks down to nothing. See his Essay on the peculiar Electricity of the Human Body in Mechel’s Archiv. Vol. III. No. 2. p. 161.
[378] The author has at times made extraordinary experiments of this kind upon himself.
[379] This phenomenon may justly be compared with the very similar but more enduring morbid sequelæ of cholera. Paralysis and a repletion of the returning vessels must be regarded in the same light in both.
[380] After Henry VIIIth’s death in 1547, Edward VI., who was only nine years old, came to the throne. He died in 1553.
[381] Caius, p. 2.
[382] Ibid. p. 28.
[383] Godwyn, p. 142. Stow, p. 1023.
[384] Caius, p. 3.
[385] Ibid. p. 7.
[386] “Which miste in the countrie wher it began, was sene flie from toune to toune, with suche a stincke in morninges and evenings, that men could scarcely abide it.”—Kaye. See Appendix, also Lat. edit. pp. 28, 29. It is to be remarked here, that in the year 1529, Damianus observed in Ghent, that more people sickened in the morning at sunrise than at any other time. p. 115. b.
[387] Hosack admits in cases of this kind, a “fermentative or assimilating process” in the atmosphere. T. I. p. 312. Laws of Contagion. Lucretius had already expressed the same thought in poetry. L. VI. v. 1118. to 1123.
[388] Caius, p. 29.
[389] Ibid. pp. 2–8.
[390] Holinshed, p. 1031, and others.
[391] Stow, p. 1023. Baker, p. 332.
[392] Godwyn, p. 142.
[393] Among others, the Duke of Suffolk and his brother. Godwyn, loc. cit.
[394] “And the same being whote and terrible, inforced the people greatly to call upon God and to do many deedes of charity: but as the disease ceased, so the devotion quickly decayed.” Grafton, p. 525.
[395] History of Medicine, Vol. II. p. 136.
[396] Caius, p. 30, and at other places quoted. “And it so folowed the Englishmen, that such marchants of England, as were in Flaunders and Spaine, and other countries beyond the sea, were visited therewithall, and none other nation infected therewith.” Grafton, loc. cit. Compare Baker, p. 332. Holinshed, p. 1031.
[397] Caius, p. 48.
[398] See Appendix, “these thre contryes (England, the Netherlands, and Germany) whiche destroy more meates and drynckes without al order, convenient time, reason, or necessitie then either Scotlande, or all other countries under the sunne, to the great annoiance of their owne bodies and wittes,” &c. Compare p. 46 of the Lat. edit.
[399] Godwyn, loc. cit., expressly assures us, that gluttons who were taken with the disease when their stomachs were full, fell victims to it; and Kaye states, that besides aged persons and children, the poor, who from necessity lived frugally, and endured hardships, either remained free, or bore the disease more easily, p. 51.
[400] See above, pp. 231, 232.
[401] Caius. See Appendix.
[402] Schwelin, p. 177.
[403] Spangenberg, fol. 463. a.
[404] Chron. Chron. p. 401.
[405] Ibid, and Spangenberg, loc. cit.
[406] Chron. Chron. loc. cit.
[407] Spangenberg, fol. 463. b.
[408] Angelus, p. 344. Spangenberg, fol. 464. a. Chron. Chron. p. 401.
[409] Spangenberg, fol. 464. a.
[410] Chron. Chron. p. 402.
[411] Haftitz, p. 167. Angelus, p. 344.
[412] Chron. Chron. p. 403. Leuthinger, p. 248.
[413] Angelus, loc. cit.
[414] Spangenberg, fol. 465. a. Magdeburg was besieged at this time for having refused to accept the “Interim.”
[415] Wurstisen, p. 624. Spangenberg, fol. 466. a.
[416] In the March of Brandenburg, crosses, as they were called, were seen upon clothes in the year 1547 (Leuthinger, p. 216); red water was seen at Zörbig, in the year 1549, (Ibid. p. 231,) and frequently likewise in the year 1551. (Chron. Chron. p. 402.) Agricola seems to point to these connected phenomena in the passage already quoted; see p. 206, note e.
[417] “Pestis insuper in certis sæviebat Germaniæ provinciis (1533,) præsertim Nurenbergæ et Babenbergæ, et villis oppidisque per girum. Et est stupenda res, quod hæc plaga nunquam totaliter cessat, sed omni anno regnat, jam hic, nunc alibi, de loco in locum, de provincia in provinciam migrando, et si recedit aliquamdiu, tamen post paucos annos et circuitum revertitur, et juventutem interim natam in ipso flore pro parte majore amputat.”—Jo. Lange, Chron. Nuremburgens. eccles., in Mencken, T. II. col. 88.
[418] Spangenberg, fol. 369. b.
[419] Fernel, de abditis rerum causis, L. II. p. 107.
[420] See Fernel. Wurstisen, (p. 613,) however, states that the preceding winter had been very warm. Thus Aph. 12. sect. III. would hold good.
[421] Wurstisen, loc. cit.
[422] L’année des vins rostis, of the French. Stettler, p. 119.
[423] Spangenberg, fol. 439. a. Chron. Chron. p. 375.
[424] Kircher, p. 147.
[425] Spangenberg, fol. 439. b.
[426] Villalba, T. I. p. 93. They committed great ravages in Spain.
[427] See Appendix, and p. 25. of the Latin edition.—Compare Haftitz, p. 149, and others.
[428] Spangenberg, fol. 439. b.
[429] Jordan, Tr. I. c. 19. p. 220.
[430] Spangenberg, fol. 440. b.
[431] Villaba, T. I. p. 94. The author has not been able to obtain the work of Sixtus Kepser, an observer of this disease. (Consultatio saluberrima de causis et remediis epidemiæ sive pestiferi morbi Bambergensium civitatem tum infestantis.) Bambergæ, 1544. 4to.
[432] See p. 236.
[433] Mezeray, p. 1036.
[434] See p. 236.
[435] Thuan. L. IV. p. 73.
[436] Spangenberg, fol. 458. a. b. 459. a.
[437] Leuthinger, p. 241.
[438] Spangenberg, fol. 460. a.
[439] Crusius, p. 280.
[440] Villalba, T. I. p. 95.
[441] See above, p. 221.
[442] Wurstisen, (1552, pestilential epidemic in Basle,) p. 627.—Spangenberg, fol. 467. b., 468. a. (Pestilence and Phrenitis.)
[443] Aikin, p. 103, et seq.
[444] See Appendix.
[445] 1556.—This edition is very rare, and is probably not to be found in Germany. The edition brought out by the author, (1833,) is taken from a very good London reprint of 1721.
[446] In the German, sometimes called “eines Tags pestilentziches Fieber.”
[447] P. 15. Lat. edit.—II. muddy, stormy, sweaty.
[448] Ibid. p. 17. seq.
[449] Ibid. p. 49.
[450] P. 31. Lat. edit.
[451] See above, p. 272.
[452] P. 43. Lat. edit.
[453] P. 44. Lat. edit. See above, p. 214.
[454] Ibid. p. 74.
[455] P. 94. Lat. edit.
[456] Practica, fol. 43. a. 263. a.
[457] Fallop. de compos. medic. cap. 41. p. 208.
[458] P. 102. Lat. edit.
[459] P. 106, 7. Ibid.
[460] Shortly before his death he resigned the Mastership, but continued to reside in the College as a fellow-commoner. See Aikin, p. 109.—Transl. note.
[461] He gave for a new building to this establishment, more than 1,800l., a very considerable sum for those times.
[462] De medendi methodo, ex Cl. Galeni Pergameni, et Joh. Bapt. Montani, Veronensis, principum medicorum, sententia, Libri duo. Basil. 1554. 8. He dedicated this frivolous book to the court-physician in ordinary, Butts. See Balæus, fol. 232. b.
[463] Compare his own work, “De Libris Propriis,” in Jebb, which is a similar imitation of Galen, and is written in nearly the same spirit.
[464] De canibus Britannicis et de rariorum animalium et stirpium historia, in Jebb.
[465] See p. 270.
[466] “Sudor anglicus fere similis ei sudori, quem cardiacum dicebamus.” De morb. int. L. II. fol. 60. a.
[467] “Est autem cor præstans atque salutaris corpori particula, præministrans omnibus sanguinem membris, atque spiritum.” Cæl. Aurel. Acut. L. II. c. 34. p. 154. Compare the Author’s “Doctrine of the circulation, before Harvey,” Berlin, 1831. 8.
[468] Cæl. Aurel. cap. 30. p. 146.
[469] Ibid. cap. 34. p. 156.
[470] The whole 34th chapter, loc. cit. Aurelian gives, from the 30th to the 40th cap., the fullest information respecting the Morbus cardiacus.
[471] Torpor frigidus, C. 35. p. 157.
[472] Hallucinatio.
[473] Cæl. Aurel. p. 157.
[474] Spiratio præfocabilis.
[475] C. 34. p. 154. Thoracis gravedo.
[476] C. 35. p. 156.
[477] Aretæus, L. II. c. 3. p. 30.
[478] Cæl. Aurel. loc. cit.
[479] Diaphoretici, cardiaci.
[480] Febres continuæ flaminatæ. Cæl. Aurel. c. 31. p. 147.
[481] Aretæus, Cur. ac. L. II. c. 3. p. 188.
[482] Cæl. Aurel. c. 33. p. 150.
[483] L. II. c. 3. p. 30.
[484] Aret. Cur. ac. L. II. c. 3. p. 193.
[485] Cæl. Aurel. c. 31. p. 146.
[486] Cæl. Aurel. c. 31. p. 146.
[487] Cæl. Aurel. c. 33. p. 153. A perfectly similar observation is made in the present day, on the increasing frequency of liver complaints in England. Parents who have been a long time in the East Indies, entail the predisposition to these diseases, which are altogether foreign to the temperate zones, on their posterity, among whom there is no need of a tropical heat, but merely common causes acting in their own country, to call forth various liver complaints. See Bell (George Hamilton).
[488] Cæl. Aurel. c. 36. p. 159.
[489] On this subject, read the classical work of Baccius.
[490] Celsus, L. III. c. 19. p. 140. Cæl. Aurel. from c. 37. on.
[491]For if one stumbles and sins just a little in a moment of passion, it easily leads them to hell. Cur. ac. L. II. c. 3. p. 188.
[492] Cæl. Aurel. c. 37. p. 169.
[493] Cæl. Aurel. c. 38. p. 171.
[494] Græcum salsum, wine with seawater, a mixture of wine and sea-water which was very much in use.
[495] Cæl. Aurel. c. 39. pp. 174, 175.
[496] Cæl. Aurel. c. 38. p. 171.
[497] “nihil jugulatione differre.” Ibid.
[498] Celsus recommended a sextarium and a half a-day, which is about 42 cubic inches, loc. cit. Cardiacorum morbo unicam spem in vino esse, certum est. Plin. Hist. Nat. L. xxiii. c. 2. T. II. p. 303. Bibere et sudare vita cardiaci est. Senec. Epist. 15. T. II. p. 68. Ed. Ruhkopf. Cardiaco cyathum nunquam mixturus amico. Juvenal. Sat. v. 32.
[499] Celsus.
[500] Aspergines, sympasmata, diapasmata. Cæl. Aurel. c. 38. p. 171.
[501] Cæl. Aurel. c. 37. p. 161.
[502] Aretæus, p. 192.
[503] Celsus, loc. cit.
[504] For instance, in the villages of Rue-Saint-Pierre and Neuville-en-Hez, between Beauvais and Clermont. Rayer, Suette, p. 74.
[505] Godofredi Welschii Historia medica novum puerperarum morbum continens. Disp. d. 20. April. 1655. Lipsiæ, 4to. The principal work upon the first visitation of miliary fever in Germany.
[506] For example, in the epidemic of 1782, which, during the course of a few months, carried off in Languedoc upwards of 30,000 people. Pujol observed in that epidemic four forms of exanthem. 1. A Purpura urticata—elevated rose-like spots, or papulæ of smaller circumference: it was very favourable, and sometimes passed off without fever. 2. Spots consisting of very small miliary vesicles and pustules which ran into each other: less favourable. 3. Small hemispherical pimples, from the size of a mustard seed to that of a corn of maize. They were surmounted by a white point before they died away, and the large kind became converted into pustules, filled with matter or greyish semitransparent phlyctænæ, with red inflamed bases. This form was the commonest, and extended, mixed with the others, over the whole surface, especially the trunk. 4. An exanthem resembling flea-bites, of a bright red, with a small grey miliary vesicle in the middle, almost invisible, except through a lens: this form was the worst. Pujol, Œuvres diverses de Médecine Pratique, 4 vols. Castres, 1801. 8vo.
[507] Foderé, III. p. 222.
[508] On this point see Allioni, who drew his classical description of miliary fever from the Piedmont epidemics.
[509] Bellot, An febri putridæ, Picardis Suette dictæ sudorifera? Diss. præs. Ott. Cas. Barfeknecht. Paris, 1733. 4to.
[510] Rayer, Suette, p. 426, where the principal passage of Bellot’s dissertation is reprinted word for word.
[511] Best in Rayer, p. 421. Not so well in Ozanam, T. iii. p. 105. The writers are very numerous.
[512] Rayer, Mazet, Bally, François, Pariset, and many others.
[513] Bally and François, in the Journal Général de Médecine, T. LXXVII. p. 204. Compare Foderé, T. III. p. 227. Ozanam, T. III. p. 116. Rayer, Suette, p. 148. Mal. d. l. p. T. I. p. 320.
[514] We may add to them also those observed in the south of Germany, in the œtiology of which Schönlein lays much stress on the contamination of the air in the process of steeping hemp. Vorlesungen, II. p. 324.
[515] It is not complete, but may render apparent the power and extent of the disease. See Rayer, Suette, p. 465.
[516] At that time inhabited by about two hundred and fifty country people. Sinner, p. 7.
[517] Dr. Thein, government physician of the town of Aub.
[518] The whole number of cases and of deaths is not stated. Dr. Sinner found nine bodies, none of which had been opened, shortly before the cessation of the disease.
[519] Everything heating was avoided; the air was cautiously purified, cooling beverage was given, and contrary to the method of Brown, at that time in vogue, few medicines, such as valerian, spirits of hartshorn, Hoffman’s drops, &c., were employed. Blisters were of service, and likewise, under some circumstances, camphor. The convalescents were well nourished.
[520] Those works only which have been consulted by the author himself are here enumerated.
[521] He treats only of petechial fevers, and that very superficially.
Transcriber’s Notes:
  • The source for the cover image is public domain per Wikimedia.
  • Blank pages have been removed.
  • Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected, otherwise spelling has been left as is.



        
        
    
Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!